Agenda packet — Paso Robles City Council, June 20, 2023 (part 5 of 6)

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
4 __ )
c;c Cf--
/ 4
-1\IICf-/.l_
/
1 '~-:-y"lll-R) r;-c. -TY 1 ,._11o_E
I I
t- I 1 _ _: I
I
A I_OIJ-;:c IJ.AU!IJA
I, I
- I
1 "n ~"ilS _ LJ f' •-E
\
/
I
I
I
l-1=
I :.:
~
~
- - -----+ ~
I • -<o
I
I ;""',\
cl
I
I
' 0 ' I
I /
_I'--+ / - f-
_,
I
- I
II
r
-, -'< -
I
'
L •" -
i '·'.
c":,~
('._)
C·
I
c;
II - :r;,----,. I
·4
i:,:i_-
1> c __ ·
~~~~-\-----\-----__________________ _,__f-~-
I

SOUTH/NORTH ELEVATION (FULL SIGN)
er
I
r
-

PLAN VIEW
i :.;
,1~~=r.

C!TJ!.Ll'
•,;J
I
,_.__

SECTION A-A
SEE DETAIL 01 SHEET SD-1

DEFERRED SUBMITTALS
O'
c-·1
'
'
'
'
- _}--
'
'
'
' ',
'
'
'
'
'
I
-+--'k->--1 j / I '_,I/I
PEO'C
1-2
~ IC>' :),:_!'
D CilT.A_ .-=::ii~JPLA.'1
l ATTA1:1H--I T
i'n( OTHrl?:J)

1. DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN WHICH ARE NOT SUBMITTED AT THE

TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION AND WHICH ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE PERMITTING AGENCY FOR

ACCEPTANCE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THAT PORTION OF THE WORK OR ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ONLY BY THE ENGINEER.

2. WHERE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS INCLUDE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, INSTALLATION, ANCHORAGE, OR

CERTIFICATION OF COMPONEN

TS THAT REQU IRE SPECIAL INSPECTION AND/OR STRUCTURAL

OBSERVATION TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS, THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE SPECIFIC

LINE ITEMS TO BE ADDED TO THE APPROPRIATE TABLES

IN THE PROJECT'S STATEMENT OF SPECIAL

INSPECTIONS PLAN IF THEY ARE NOT ALREADY IDENTIFIED

3. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF DEFERRED SUBMITTALS THAT ARE EXPECTED TO CONTAIN

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS OR SAFETY RELATED SYSTEM INFORMATION FOR REVIEW TO MEET BUILDING PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGNED SYSTEMS. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE

INDICATED STRUCTURAL ELEMENT, EQUIPMENT, DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, OR COMPONENT OR ITS

ANCHORAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE REQUIRED CALCULATIONS AND SUPPORTING DATA AND DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEER.

3.1. DIGITAL PANEL ATTACHMENT METHOD

3.2. DIGITAL PANEL FRAMING
NOTE: ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED
BY AN AWS CERTIFIED WELDER. SUBMIT

CERTIFICATE TO TH E BU
ILDING INSPECTOR.

I) ll1ll~'l1
-
0 M
>< -
0 I I
I
z
l9
I I
V)
IS) N
ffi ~ wui
lf) {i
I- w
D 'i'i
z C) ::) C) ,I:

D~
_J 'i'i
~~ u
I:
u ■
z OJ
ct)
(1')
01 ~
(1')
~ -s;jOJ
z lfl
lfl
rt. ill
IJ
w \L
w \L
()
z ■ - ~
~ F
(1')
z OJ
w ~
D c5 z
z U)
w
<( el
\L
z ■
ct)
~ Cl
~
- w
U) I-
::J
w U)
D w
~ D _J
w ill
~~ - ()
u el
0~
U) :D
U) 3
<( ~
.1~i6(-E~Sto;ji; .. -- ~ /--- --- < ieff~'-L DJc,'~ /'-i;/ --, Q\ /~/~ 4<:,\.,.-\ ;~/~ ,A\-.&\
(~I NO,S3396 IE \ *\ EXP. 9-30-23 ;*;
\_&\_ ,SJ- #'"!~/
• ..-::;,· ·····---~c,~./ flc~
·(rQ;;-c~1.f9-·

REVISIONS
Ii I.R. REVISION )8/30/2;
I/!\
1i\
If
Is 1 1 UJ
UJ
J:
en
-
JOB NO. E23002
DATE 3/27/2023
Attachment 9

Page 516 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
(APPLY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PERMIT DRAWING)
CODE · 2022 CBC
WIND DESIGN· SIGN STRUCTURE WIND LOADS ARE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASCE 7-16 SECTION 29.3.1.

BASIC WIND SPEED: 94 MPH (3 SECOND GUST)
RISKCATEGORY: II
EXPOSURE: C
DESIGN WIND PRESSURE (SERVICE LEVEL): 33 PSF (AVERAGE), 41.4 PSF (MAXIMUM) REFER TO ASCE 7-16 FIGURE 29.3-1.

ANY SIGN COMPONENTS NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAILED ON THESE DRAWINGS BUT ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INFORMATION ABOVE.

SEISMIC DESIGN • SIGN STRUCTURE SEISMIC LOADS ARE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASCE 7-16 CHAPTER 15 USING DATA FOR SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS FROM TABLE 15.4-2.:

RISK CATEGORY: II
MAPPED SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS: Ss = 0.583 S1 = 0.227 SITE CLASS: D
SPECTRAL RESPONSE COEFFICIENTS: SDs = 0.518, SD1 = •NULL SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY: "D"
FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM : CANTILEVERED COLUMN
DESIGN BASE SHEAR: 4.9 KIPS
SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT (Cs): 0.173
RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTOR (R): 3
Fq=1.334 Fv=2.146
SEISMIC BASE SHEAR IS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12.8 "EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE P ROCEDURE" USING THE DESIGN DATA ABOVE
LIVE LOAD- CATWALKS: 40 PSF OR 300 POUNDS AT ANY POINT
DEAD LOADLED DISPLAY: 2500 LBS EACH
OTHER STRUCTURAL MEMBERS: AS NOTED IN CALCULATIONS
STEEL- WIDE FLANGES - ASTM A-992, OTHER SHAPES & PLATES - ASTM A-36.

PIPE SECTIONS - ASTM A-53 BORA 252 GR 2, OR API - LX WITH MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS.

EXPANDED METAL GRATING - EXPANDED METAL GRATING SHALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM

CARBON STEEL IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE EXPANDED METAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (EMMA) STANDARD NO. 557-99, 'STANDARDS FOR EXPANDED METAL.' EMMA IS A DIVISION OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ARCHITECTURAL METAL MANUFACTURERS (NAAMM).

ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE FABRICATED AND ERECTED ACCORDING TO LATEST AISC SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD PRACTICE.

PAINTING - ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL, EXPOSED TO WEATHER, SHALL BE SHOP PRIMED AND PA INTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISC 335 (SPECIFICATION) AND AISC 303 (STANDARD PRACTICE).

CONCRETE· CONCRETE SHALL BE PROPORTIONED WITH TYPE II CEMENT AND HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. CONCRETE TO BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318 WITH A MAXIMUM SLUMP OF 4".

WELDING -ALL WELDING MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH AWS

01.1. BOLTS - ALL REGULAR SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-307. HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-325. ALL BOLTS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO A SNUG T IGHT CONDITION UNLESS NOTED TO BE PRE-TENSIONED (PT). PT BOLTS SHALL BE FULLY TENSIONED PER AISC TURN OF THE NUT METHOD (1/3 OF A TURN PAST A SNUG TIGHT CONDITION) OR OTHER AISC APPROVED TENSIONING METHOD.

FOUNDATION: ROUND COLUMN FOOTING - EMBEDMENT DEPTH FOR FOOT ING DOES NOT APPLY

TO LOCATIONS WHERE WALLS OF THE HOLE WILL NOT STAND WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPORT, OR WHERE UNCOMPACTED FILL OR ORGANIC FILL EXISTS. FOUNDATION IS DESIGNED UTILIZING LATERAL BEARING PER IBC SECTION 1806.3. ALLOWABLE LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE PER IBC TABLE 1806.2 IS 100 PSF/FT (CLASS 5 - TYPE: CLAY, SANDY CLAY, SILTY CLAY, CLAYEY SILT, SILT AND SANDY SILT). DESIGNED LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE HAS BEEN MULTIPLIED BY 2 PER SECTION 1806.3.4. VERIFY SOI L TYPE DURING EXCAVATION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCY.

EXTEND COLUMN PIPE TO BOTTOM OF FOOTING (3" CONCRETE COVER REQUIRED) SPECIAL INSPECTIONS - SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 17 FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
•• HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS: PERIODIC INSPECTION TO REVIEW BOLT TYPE AND TENSION •• FOUNDATION: VERIFY PROPER DIAMETER AND DEPTH.
•• FIELD WELDING: INSPECTION OF ALL FIELD WELDS PER AISC AND AWS 01 .1

STRUCTURAL WELDING SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED ABOVE SHALL BE COMPLETED DURING

FABRICATION OF MATERIALS WHETHER IN SHOP OR FIELD

STEEL FABRICATOR -ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE SHOP FABRICATED BY THE FOLLOWING CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY APPROVED FABRICATOR:

PAGE STEEL
2040 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
PAGE, ARIZONA 86040

THE ERECTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD BEFORE ERECTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ..

THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER WILL NOT SUPERVISE THE FABRICATION OR ERECTION OF THIS STRUCTURE.
/
l'-8'
,,.~.
.'I\
~ I'
!,'-"'j"
--,~----- _)O.
'~~==¥=~~
l,P=i ~ --•- C'.('Ll..lv·1
·-1n:

I -:,,
C~lJ'j'.jC I
1··
1-::, :=C)_
-..i
,_ C:Fl·.=F
r~~ LI_/
I '
!k
( '"'
\ ~, r rl
L
IJj() IC),9
.I.CJ li"'c
'.PT) ·-2, ·:r,
nt)I Tc'--
lll3()/.ICU
• C
I, -
I;~ -
Sl.cl'I
I-
[ 11
C.
- I
;;
CJ]
.,
r
I I •
i 2 -
r
'J
I
n /~-c::... -'
·-)
'
R()_ TS U.h.

PL Ii
·--'JII:

CF IIC,
UI-_ 1-D
-"· '1 p:;' - Ii J Luc=
LI.ALI/LI.A
:; l
/ ~ 1,:'. -
--'--.
'.\ /I \
G
I
U C_J c_, = k:

CA 11_/c. .. l f;
/
T"P
I
.. Jl),k L "-'FIC,1 IT
I
,r'
I F l<
_c+,_1 _,_:: __ _/ .1 i --41-~--- = __ _
~ ~/

L - - - -
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
/
I" L Ii
- I /·:)•'xi' '01
r
L" qu
/
+ -B-
+ --8-
t /
·2,
- /
Ul-'f·'=k
1· A I J A. I <
I'-].
'
·)/"c ?-.,lS''-t::;('.

Ls I ()·,,;'.'jl:Jl--1 1--'l -'C
LC:lli=·c c:,. I lll,\LI'
'iEE .-E,:JL -
2"
IJE \ I e_·_;3
/
r
·- :::i l"o > .:?; IS"-S:_-)
ks1 T()F?'::IC.IN :::J[F:=_
([:;;, ?: -4' ,t _A,j:J~,
[1 () I I •~ ,:_,. . .z:.. :!,, .c
® ~~~G~-~ ~
1 ~~READER CONN. SECTION
c:. c-, 2 '-"' :=;:, 3
(_)_(:
04 COLUMN SPLICE DETAIL
SCAI F- //" = l'-C''
l==1=p ,-· I I.WI!
rir- _ ::,
C; :,, ':T::1= 1) ks1:1
I 1--:i \IC1
1°_/ IE
I :~•lllrF CCJLLl'll·I
f-'l~i= cjQ't I
C).?, l'.)','.f-1_-~2 ks11
IS) N
ffi Ci\ ~
(1) lf)
(1) ~ IS)
ll) lf) N z .::
-
0 M
>< -
0 I I
I
\J
ui ui z ll) {i -<( I- w D 'i'i ul
z C) > ::) C) w
,I: D
D~ z
w
_J 'iY_ I:
~w 'i'i
I I- -<(
\J
I:
z lfl
l9 ~ I I ~ CTI -~
CJ) :::J [: lfl +- - I.) L \.)
(\) (\)(\) lfl
+-
, "s:. [: ~ VJ\JO"IL
UJ~~~
_J
ca
~
0 CJ)
~
"
_/~RO(-E~Sto;ji; .. "~ /--- --- < !eff~:ol DJ,/~ /'-i;/ -,, Q\ /~/~ 4<:,\.,.-\ ;~/~ ,A\-.&\
(~I N0.S3396 IE
'- *\ EXP. 9-30-23 ;*;
\. &·\' ,SJ- # /!~/
• ..-::;,· ··--.... ~c,~_/ fl,.~
· ,,.f(J;; c~,~~~

REVISIONS
1/\ I.R. REVISION 38/30/2;
'./
Ii',/
I /
lit
ISD-1 UJ
UJ
J:
en
JOB NO. E23002
DATE 3/27/2023
Attachment 9

Page 517 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT REPORT

PASO ROBLES PETERBILT PROJECT
2805 THEATRE DRIVE

PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA
Project No. 2202-1101
Prepared for:

Craig Archer
Coast Counties Peterbilt
1740 4th Street
San Jose, California 95112
Prepared by:

Padre Associates, Inc.
369 Pacific Street
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
APRIL 2022
nadre
l(";'ssoc i ates, inc.

ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS &
~ ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
Attachment 9

Page 518 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- ii -
Authenticity and Signature Page
Padre Associates, Inc.
369 Pacific Street
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
Padre Associates, Inc. hereby certifies that all statements furnished in the following Biological Resources Assessment Report and all supporting information acquired for this biological assessment are true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. Further, we certify that the field survey associated with this report was performed by Padre and that the report accurately represents all information retained from the field visit. ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Christina Santala Shannon Gonzalez
Project Biologist Project Biologist
____________________________________
Alyssa Berry
Senior Biologist
Attachment 9

Page 519 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- iii -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1-1

2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK....................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 FEDERAL REGULATIONS ......................................................................................... 2-1

2.1.1 Endangered Species Act of 1972. ........................................................................ 2-1

2.1.2 Migratory Bird Treaty Act ...................................................................................... 2-1

2.2 STATE REGULATIONS .............................................................................................. 2-2

2.2.1 California Fish and Game Code. .......................................................................... 2-2

2.3 LOCAL REGULATIONS.............................................................................................. 2-2

3.0 METHODS....................................................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 DESKTOP REVIEW .................................................................................................... 3-1

3.2 FIELD SURVEYS........................................................................................................ 3-1

4.0 FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................... 4-1

4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..................................................................................... 4-1

4.2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 4-1

4.2.1 Botanical .............................................................................................................. 4-1

4.2.2 Wildlife ................................................................................................................. 4-2

4.2.3 Aquatic Resources ............................................................................................... 4-2

4.3 SPECIAL-STATUS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ........................................................ 4-2

4.3.1 Special-Status Habitats ........................................................................................ 4-6

4.3.2 Special-Status Botanical....................................................................................... 4-6

4.3.3 Special-Status Wildlife .......................................................................................... 4-7

5.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS.................................................................................................... 5-1

6.0 RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES ................................................................. 6-1

7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 7-1

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1. Project Location .....................................................................................................1-2 Figure 4-1. Biological Assessment Survey Results ..................................................................4-4 Figure 4-2. Regional Special-Status Biological Resources .......................................................4-5

APPENDICES
Appendix A Site Photographs
Appendix B Vascular Plant List
Appendix C Wildlife List
Appendix D CNDDB Results
Attachment 9

Page 520 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 1-1 -

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) has prepared this Biological Resources Assessment Report (Report) on behalf of Craig Archer of Coast Counties Peterbilt (Client) to document the results of a biological resources assessment completed in support of the environmental review process for the proposed Paso Robles Peterbilt Dealership Development Project (Project) at 2805 Theatre Drive, Paso Robles, San Luis Obispo County, California (Project Site) (Figure 1-1 – Project Location); Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 009-851-022. This Report documents the results of a desktop review and field survey, and includes a discussion of existing biological resources, special-status biological resources that have the potential to occur within the proposed Project Site, potential Project impacts to these resources, and recommendations for impact avoidance and minimization measures.

Attachment 9

Page 521 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

PROJECT LOCATION
Source: Esri Online Topo Basemap, County of San Luis Obispo Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet Notes: This map was created for informational and display purposes only.

LEGEND:

Project Boundary
2202-1101 April 2022
FIGURE
1-1
2805 THEATRE DRIVE
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CA PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:

PROJECT NAME:
0 1,000 2,000
FEET
MAP EXTENT:

SAN LUIS
OBISPO
COUNTY
Z:\GIS Projects\GIS Maps\Map Project\2805 Theatre Drive\Project Location.mxd 4/13/2022 CJ
.,.
~~ ,, //
Attachment 9

Page 522 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 2-1 -

2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
The regulatory framework identifies policies and plans administered by resource agencies pertaining to biological resources that are known to exist and/or have the potential to occur within the Project region.

2.1 FEDERAL REGULATIONS

2.1.1 Endangered Species Act of 1972.

The Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), provides protection to species listed as Threatened or Endangered, and critical habitat designated for the protection of such species. The FESA prohibits “take” of Threatened and Endangered species (including plants) except under certain circumstances and only with authorization from the USFWS through a permit under sections 4(d), 7, or 10(a) of the FESA. Under the FESA, take is defined as to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.

Critical Habitat is defined in Section 3(5)(A) of the FESA as: (1) specific areas within the geographical area occupied by the species at the time of listing, on which are found those physical or biological features that are essential to the conservation of the listed species and that may require special management considerations or protection; and (2) specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species at the time of listing that are essential for the conservation of a listed species.

The FESA also provides protection to those species proposed to be listed under FESA or critical habitats proposed to be designated for such species. In addition to the listed species, the federal government also maintains lists of species that are neither formally listed nor proposed but could potentially be listed in the future. These federal candidate species include taxa for which substantial information on biological vulnerability and potential threats exist and are maintained to support the appropriateness of proposing to list the taxa as an Endangered or Threatened species.

2.1.2 Migratory Bird Treaty Act
The USFWS also administers the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16 USC 703-711). Under the MBTA, it is unlawful to take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in 50 CFR 10, including feathers or other parts of birds, nests, eggs or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations (50 CFR 21). In 2017, Solicitor of the Department of the Interior issued a legal opinion (M-37050 or M-Opinion) stating that “The Migratory Bird Treaty Act Does Not Prohibit Incidental Take” which in effect revoked take protections under the MBTA. On January 5, 2021, the USFWS published a final rule that defined the scope of the MBTA stating that incidental take of birds resulting from an activity is not prohibited when the underlying purpose of that activity is not to take birds. On May 6, 2021, the USFWS announced a proposed rule to revoke the January 7 final regulation that limited the scope of the MBTA, in an effort to reinstate federal MBTA protections. The proposed rule is pending as of June 2021.

Attachment 9

Page 523 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 2-2 -
In the interim, migratory birds are protected (for take) through AB 454 California Migratory Bird Protection Act (California Fish and Game Code 3513).

2.2 STATE REGULATIONS

2.2.1 California Fish and Game Code.

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) administers a number of laws and programs designed to protect plants, fish, and wildlife resources. Principal of these is the California Endangered Species Act of 1984 (CESA - Fish and Game Code Section 2050) that regulates the listing and take of State Endangered and Threatened species. CDFW also maintains lists of Candidate-Endangered species and Candidate-Threatened species. California candidate species are afforded the same level of protection as listed species. CDFW manages the California Native Plant Protection Act of 1977 (Fish and Game Code Section 1900, et seq.), which was enacted to identify, designate, and protect rare plants. The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) operates under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the CDFW which outlines broad cooperation in rare plant assessment and protection and formalizes cooperative ventures such as data sharing and production of complementary information sources for rare plants.

2.3 LOCAL REGULATIONS
San Luis Obispo County (County) incorporates all USFWS, CDFW, Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) standards when assessing project impacts to vegetation, wildlife, and wetland habitats, as well as the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) evaluation process, when applicable. The County has developed a framework of land use policies and recommendations intended to reduce impacts to sensitive biological resources.

Oak trees are protected under San Luis Obispo County Land Use Ordinance, Title 22; Chapters 22.56 (Tree Preservation) and 22.58 (Oak Woodland Ordinance) (San Luis Obispo County 2021).

Attachment 9

Page 524 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 3-1 -

3.0 METHODS
Methods to collect biological resources information included a desktop review and field survey of the Biological Study Area (BSA), which encompassed the entire Project Site.

3.1 DESKTOP REVIEW
Prior to conducting the field survey, a query of the CDFW California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) was conducted to identify documented occurrences of special-status plant and wildlife species, and sensitive habitats within the vicinity of the BSA. The CNDDB is a continually refined and updated computerized inventory of rare animals, plants, and natural community location information in California, including species that are listed as federally and/or State endangered/threatened. All wildlife taxa listed with the CNDDB are considered “special animals” in which the CDFW is interested in tracking, regardless of their legal protection status.

The Project Site is located within the Templeton 7.5-minute United States Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle, and the CNDDB search was focused on this and eight adjacent quadrangles within approximately ten miles of the BSA, including Paso Robles, Estrella, Creston, Santa Margarita, Atascadero, Morro Bay North, York Mountain, and Adelaida. The USFWS Critical Habitat database was also investigated to identify critical habitat for federally listed species within the BSA or surrounding region. In addition, the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) was accessed to identify previously documented wetlands within the BSA or surrounding area.

3.2 FIELD SURVEYS
On March 31, 2022, Padre Biologists, Christina Santala and Shannon Gonzalez completed a field survey within the BSA focused on the existing biological resources, presence/absence of special-status plant and wildlife species and habitats, as well as the suitability of habitat to support these species within the BSA.

Field survey methods consisted of walking paths of opportunity throughout the BSA and recording wildlife species observed by visual observation using binoculars, indirect signs (e.g., tracks, scat, skeletal remains, and burrows), and/or auditory cues (i.e., calls and songs). Field notes on botanical resources and vegetation communities/habitats were also recorded. Field surveys were conducted in March, within the typical blooming period for most special-status plant species know to occur in the proposed Project region.

Vegetation within the BSA was divided and classified into vegetation types based on A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition (MCV2) (Sawyer, et. al., 2009), or described as site-specific vegetation and/or land use cover types not treated in the MCV2 (i.e., ruderal). All identifiable plant species observed within the BSA were documented. Plant specimens that were not positively identified in the field were further examined using appropriate botanical keys, including The Jepson Manual Vascular Plants of California (Baldwin et. al., 2012).

Attachment 9

Page 525 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 4-1 -

4.0 FINDINGS
The following discussion of biological resources includes those that were observed within the BSA, those identified in the desktop review, and resources that have the potential to occur based on the presence of suitable habitat. Supporting documentation includes Figure 4-1 – Biological Resources Assessment Results, Figure 4-2 – Regional Special-Status Biological Resources, Appendix A – Site Photographs, Appendix B – Plant List, Appendix C – Wildlife List, and Appendix D – CNDDB Results.

4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The Project Site is located on the corner of Nutwood Circle and Theatre Drive, just west of Highway 101 in the City of Paso Robles, San Luis Obispo County, California. The Project Site is a vacant lot surrounded by residential and commercial development, with areas of previous disturbance (e.g., tilling, stockpiling, grading, etc.) and old infrastructure throughout the property.

The topography of the area is level to moderately sloping and is situated on the eastern edge of the Santa Lucia Range.

4.2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

4.2.1 Botanical
A list of plant species identified in the BSA during the March 2022 field survey is provided in Appendix B – Plant List. Vegetation communities documented to occur within the Project Site are described in the following paragraphs.

Wild oats and annual brome grassland (Avena spp. – Bromus spp. Herbaceous Semi-Natural Alliance). The Wild oats and annual brome grassland alliance occurs in all topographic settings in foothills, waste places, rangelands, and openings in woodlands. This alliance is characterized by presence of slender wild oats (Avena barbata), wild oats (Avena fatua), false brome (Brachypodium distachyon), rattlesnake grass (Briza maxima), ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), soft chess (Bromus hordeaceus) and/or foxtail barley (Hordeum murinum) as dominant or co-dominant with other non-natives in the herbaceous layer; cover is open to continuous (Sawyer et. al., 2009). As observed during the field survey, this alliance occurred throughout the BSA. Dominant to co-dominant species included ripgut brome, wild oats, Mediterranean vetch (Vicia benghalensis), tocalote (Centaurea melitensis), red brome (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens), redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium), with sparse to moderate occurrences of common fiddleneck (Amsinckia intermedia), telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandiflora) and wild radish (Raphanus sativus). There were several sapling and mature valley oak (Quercus lobata) trees scattered throughout this vegetation alliance within the BSA. This alliance is not considered sensitive by the CDFW and is not protected under CEQA.

Attachment 9

Page 526 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 4-2 -
Ornamental. Within this Report, Ornamental is a site-specific vegetation classification that describes the planted landscape trees and shrubs within the BSA. As observed during the field survey, tree species included blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus), pine (Pinus sp.) and Coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia). Ornamental trees may provide suitable foraging and nesting habitat for fauna.

This vegetation community is not considered sensitive by the CDFW and is not protected under CEQA.

Ruderal. Within this Report, Ruderal is a term used to describe the unpaved parking area within the BSA. This disturbed area can support vegetative cover consisting primarily of disturbance adapted plant species (ruderal species). As observed during the field survey, the Ruderal area consisted of bare ground with patches of non-native species including cheeseweed (Malva parviflora), redstem filaree, and barley. This vegetation community is not considered sensitive by the CDFW and is not protected under CEQA.

4.2.2 Wildlife
Wildlife was identified during the survey through indirect sign and direct observations of individuals. Species observed and detected included western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), California scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica), acorn woodpecker (Melanerpes formicivorus), house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), and Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae). A complete list of observed wildlife species can be found in Appendix C – Wildlife Species Observed within the BSA.

4.2.3 Aquatic Resources
Based on the results of the desktop review and field observations, no aquatic resources were identified within the Project Site; however, several aquatic features were identified within one mile of the BSA. The NWI recorded features include a Riverine unnamed drainage approximately 0.07 miles south, the Salinas River approximately 0.8 miles east, a Freshwater Emergent Wetland approximately 0.3 miles northwest, and two Freshwater Ponds approximately

0.4 miles west of the BSA (USFWS, 2022b). In addition, an unrecorded drainage basin approximately 0.01 miles west of the Project Site was observed within the BSA during the March 2022 survey. This man-made basin appeared to collect water run-off from the street drain off Nutwood Circle and was vegetated with plant species similar to the surrounding grassland including tocalote, redstem filaree, and annual grasses. A fenced drainage basin was also present within the Project Site and supported vegetation similar to the surrounding grassland. No water was present in these aquatic features.

4.2.4 Oak Trees
Six valley oak trees of varying diameter at breast height (DBH) were observed throughout the Project Site (Figure 4-1). DBH for the six oak trees were as follows: 54 inches, 48 inches, 48 inches, 8 inches, 4 inches, and 4 inches.

4.3 SPECIAL-STATUS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Results of the nine-quadrangle (approximately ten miles surrounding the Project Site) CNDDB query for regional occurrences of special-status plant and wildlife species, and sensitive vegetation communities can be found in Appendix D (CDFW, 2022a). This Report focuses on the special-status plants and wildlife biological resources within five miles of the BSA (Project region) Attachment 9

Page 527 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 4-3 -
that have a greater potential to occur within the Project Site based on proximity of documented occurrences. Figure 4-2 depicts CNDDB occurrences and USFWS Critical Habitat within five miles of the Project Site.

Attachment 9

Page 528 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
!(
!(
§¨¦101

NUTWOOD CIR

RAMADA DR

NUTWOOD
CIR

THEATRE DR

EASY ST

RANCHO PASO DR

VIA SAN CARLOS

VIA SANTA BARBARA

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT RESULTS MAP
Source: Esri Online Imagery Basemap, County of San Luis Obispo Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet Notes: This map was created for informational and display purposes only.

LEGEND:

Project Boundary
BSA Boundary
!( Culvert
Drainage Basin
Remnant soil/gravel stockpile feature
Tree
Valley Oak
Vegetation Communities
Ornamental
Ruderal
Wild oats and annual brome grassland
0 125 250
Feet
2202-1101 April 2022
FIGURE
4-1
2805 THEATRE DRIVE

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CA
PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:

PROJECT NAME:

SAN LUIS
OBISPO
COUNTY
MAP EXTENT:

Z:\GIS Projects\GIS Maps\Map Project\2805 Theatre Drive\Biological Resources Assessment Results Map.mxd 4/14/2022 □ D
•
• • •
,--------, ( . .
\
.

I
.
\
\
. ' I
I ' . J '----------
Attachment 9

Page 529 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Project Location
shining
navarretia
Lemmon's
jewelflower
mesa horkelia
least
Bell's vireo
Lompoc
grasshopper
tricolored
blackbird
Santa
Lucia
dwarf rush
San Joaquin
kit fox
California
red-legged
frog
western
spadefoot
western pond
turtle
American
badger

REGIONAL SPECIAL-STATUS

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MAP
Source: Esri Online Topo Basemap, County of San Luis Obispo, CNDDB Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet Notes: CNDDB = California Natural Diveristy Database,
This map was created for informational and display purposes only.

LEGEND:

Project Boundary
Buffer - 5 miles
CNDDB Occurrences
Plant (specific)
Plant (non-specific)
Plant (circular)
Animal (80m)
Animal (specific)
Animal (non-specific)
Animal (circular)
Multiple (circular)
0 5,000 10,000
Feet
2202-1101 April 2022
FIGURE
4-2
2805 THEATRE DRIVE

SAN LUIS COUNTY, CA
PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:

PROJECT NAME:

SAN LUIS
OBISPO
COUNTY
MAP EXTENT:

Z:\GIS Projects\GIS Maps\Map Project\2805 Theatre Drive\Regional Special-Status Biological Resources.mxd 4/14/2022 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY;

NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
/
I
I
I
I •
I
I
\
I
I
\
,
,
\
D
• 0
'
(7J
D
D
------ -- - ...
-----
" ...
0 '
•. . '
I" •! ~ __.> '
, '
• '
/
\
,
,
I
I
I
Attachment 9

Page 530 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 4-6 -

4.3.1 Special-Status Habitats
No USFWS-Designated Critical Habitat overlaps the BSA. The nearest occurrence is vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) USFWS-Designated Critical Habitat approximately

5.4 miles northeast of the BSA (USFWS, 2022a).

Valley Oak Woodland, a sensitive natural community defined by CDFW, is documented within five miles of the BSA; however, this natural community is not present within the Project Site (CDFW, 2022a).

4.3.2 Special-Status Botanical
Special-status plants are either listed as Endangered or Threatened under FESA or CESA, considered Rare under the California Native Plant Protection Act, or considered rare (but not legally listed) by resources agencies, professional organizations, and the scientific community under the following categories:

1. Plants listed or proposed for listing as Threatened or Endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (50 CFR 17.12 for listed plants and various notices in the Federal Register for proposed species,).

2. Plants that are candidates for possible future listing as Threatened or Endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (Federal Register October 10, 2019).

3. Plants that meet the definitions of rare or endangered species under the CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15380).

4. Plants considered by the CNPS to be "Rare, Threatened, or Endangered" in California (Ranks 1B and 2 in CNPS, 2020).

5. Plants listed by CNPS as plants about which we need more information and plants of limited distribution (Ranks 3 and 4 in CNPS, 2020).

6. Plants listed or proposed for listing by the State of California as Threatened or Endangered under the California Endangered Species Act (14 CCR 670.5).

7. Plants listed under the California Native Plant Protection Act (California Fish and Game Code 1900 et seq.).

8. Plants considered sensitive by other Federal agencies (i.e., U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management), state and local agencies or jurisdictions.

9. Plants considered sensitive or unique by the scientific community or occurring at the limits of their natural range (State CEQA Guidelines).

Based on the CNDDB query completed as part of the desktop review, there were 43 special-status plant species documented within approximately ten miles of the BSA (Appendix D).

Of these species, one species, Lemmon's jewelflower (Caulanthus lemmonii), had a greater potential to occur within the Project Site based on proximity of documented occurrences (less than five miles) and presence of generally suitable habitat (grassland) within the BSA.

Attachment 9

Page 531 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 4-7 -
No special-status plant species were observed during the March 2022 field survey. The survey was conducted within the typical blooming period for potentially occurring special-status plant species of the region and would be identifiable in March. Based on the field survey observations and habitat conditions (dominance of disturbance-adapted plant species) no special-status plant species are likely to occur within the Project Site.

4.3.3 Special-Status Wildlife
Special-status wildlife species are either listed as Endangered or Threatened under FESA or CESA, or considered rare (but not formally listed) by resources agencies, professional organizations, and the scientific community under the following categories:
x Animals listed or proposed for listing as Threatened or Endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (50 CFR 17.11 for listed animals and various notices in the Federal Register for proposed species).
x Animals that are candidates for possible future listing as Threatened or Endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (Federal Register October 10, 2019). x Animals that meet the definitions of rare or endangered species under the CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15380)
x Animal considered Species of Special Concern (SSC) by CDFW (Shuford and Gardali, 2008 for birds; Williams, 1986 for mammals; Moyle et al., 2015 for fish; and Thomson et al., 2016 for amphibians and reptiles).
x Animals listed or proposed for listing by the State of California as Threatened and Endangered under the California Endangered Species Act (14 CCR 670.5). x Animal species that are fully protected in California (California Fish and Game Code, Section 3511 [birds], 4700 [mammals], and 5050 [reptiles and amphibians]). x Animal species protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (as amended in 1994).
x Birds of Conservation Concern. Migratory and nonmigratory bird species (beyond those already designated as federally Threatened or Endangered) that represent the USFWS highest conservation priorities in effort to draw attention to species in need of conservation action (Shuford and Gardali, 2008).
x Birds on the CDFW Watch List include “Taxa to Watch” (Shuford and Gardali, 2008) 1) not on the current Special Concern list but were on previous lists and they have not been state listed under CESA; 2) were previously state or federally listed and now are on neither list; or 3) are on the list of “Fully Protected” species.

Based on the CNDDB query completed as part of the desktop review, there were 38 special-status wildlife species documented within approximately ten miles of the BSA. Of those 38, there are three special-status wildlife species with the potential to occur within the Project Site based on suitable habitat and regional (less than five miles) documented occurrences. These species include Northern California legless lizard (Anniella pulchra), American badger (Taxidea taxus), and San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica).

Attachment 9

Page 532 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 4-8 -
No special-status wildlife species were observed during the March 2022 field survey.

However, the Project Site may provide suitable habitat to support the special-status wildlife species listed above. The following sections provide an overview of the general habitat requirements for these species and further detail on the potential for each of these species to occur in the Project Site.

4.3.3.1 Reptiles
Northern legless lizard is a predominantly subterranean lizard that occupies moist, warm, and loose soils with vegetative cover (Stebbins, 2003). It has the potential to utilize areas of the Project Site that have dense leaf litter. Refer to Section 6.0 for recommended mitigation measures for protection of Northern legless lizard during Project activities.

4.3.3.2 Mammals
American badger is a CDFW Species of Special Concern and San Joaquin kit fox is listed as Federally Endangered and State Threatened. The annual grassland habitat, and presence of small mammal (ground squirrel) burrows indicate that general conditions within the Project Site are suitable for both species. No large burrows or sign (i.e., scat, tracks, prey remains, etc.) were identified during the March 2022 survey. Further, the Project Site is situated adjacent to Highway 101 and is surrounded by residential and commercial development that creates significant dispersal barriers for these species. However, because there are documented occurrences within five miles, and generally suitable grassland habitat is, there is a low potential for American badger and San Joaquin kit fox to occur within the Project Site. Refer to Section 6.0 for recommended mitigation measures for protection of these species during Project activities.

4.3.3.3 Nesting Birds
No nesting bird activity was observed within the BSA during the March 2022 field survey; however, trees and vegetation present within or adjacent to the Project Site provide suitable nesting habitat for a variety of bird species. Nesting birds and their nests/eggs are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 and California Fish and Game Code. Nesting bird season generally occurs between February 1 and August 31. Refer to Section 6.0 for recommended mitigation measures for protection of potentially nesting birds during Project activities.

Attachment 9

Page 533 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 5-1 -

5.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS
The proposed Project would include development of most of the Project Site. Grading and construction activities have the potential to impact special-status biological resources that have the potential to occur within the Project Site.

Potential impacts to special-status biological resources are construction-related, including mortality or injury from equipment operations, vehicle traffic, and loss of habitat. Project-related noise also has the potential to negatively affect nesting bird activity within or adjacent to the Project Site. Refer to Section 6.0 for recommended mitigation measures to avoid and/or minimize impacts to special-status biological resources.

Attachment 9

Page 534 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 6-1 -

6.0 RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
Implementation of the following avoidance and minimization measures are recommended to protect sensitive biological resources to the greatest extent feasible during proposed Project activities:

1. Work Timing. All work activities shall be completed during daylight hours (between sunrise and sunset) and outside of rain events;

2. Work Limits. The Project impact area shall be clearly marked or delineated with stakes, flagging, tape, or signage prior to work. Areas outside of work limits shall be considered environmentally sensitive and shall not be disturbed;

3. Vehicles and Equipment. All equipment and vehicles shall be checked and maintained daily to prevent spills of fuel, oil, and other hazardous materials. A designated staging area shall be established for vehicle/equipment parking and storage of fuel, lubricants, and solvents. All fueling and maintenance activities shall take place in the staging area;

4. Pre-Activity Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal (i.e., tree trimming/removal activities) is scheduled between February 1 and August 31 (general nesting bird season), nesting bird surveys shall be completed by a qualified biologist within 48 hours prior to start of work. If any active nests are discovered within or adjacent to work limits, an appropriate buffer (i.e., 500 feet for raptors and 250 feet for other birds, or at the discretion of a qualified biologist based on biological or ecological reasons) shall be established to protect the nest until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active and/or the young have fledged;

5. Pre-Activity Special-Status Species Survey. Within 30 days of the start of construction, a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-activity survey of the Project Site for signs of San Joaquin kit fox and American badger, including tracks, scat, or suitable burrows (burrows four inches or greater in diameter). Potential dens shall be tracked for a minimum of four nights with motion-activated cameras to determine if the burrow is actively being used by San Joaquin kit fox or badger. All potential dens shall be avoided by a minimum of 50 feet until they have been determined to be inactive. In the event San Joaquin kit fox is identified within the Project Site, the USFWS, CDFW, and all other appropriate agencies/government entities shall be contacted for further consultation.

In conjunction with the badger and kit fox survey, the qualified biologist will conduct a survey for Northern legless lizard. Hand search methods, including raking, will be used during the survey in areas where legless lizards are expected to be found (e.g., sandy/loose soils, under shrubs/leaf litter, other vegetation, or debris). If observed, the qualified biologist will relocate the lizard to nearby suitable habitat. The qualified biologist will prepare a completion letter-report to document the pre-activity survey results.

6. Oak Tree Removal. If oak tree removal and/or damage is unavoidable due to Project implementation, the County may require mitigation for impacts to mature oak trees.

Attachment 9

Page 535 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 6-2 -
Mitigation may require preparation of an oak tree protection and replacement plan that would provide guidance for onsite and/or offsite oak tree replacement planting.

Attachment 9

Page 536 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
- 7-1 -

7.0 REFERENCES
Baldwin, Bruce G., Goldman, Douglas H., Keil, David J., Rosatti, Thomas J. 2012. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition. University of California Press.

Berkeley, California.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2022a. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Rare Find Paso Robles, Estrella, Creston, Santa Margarita, Atascadero, Morro Bay North, York Mountain, and Adelaida.7.5-minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangles.
------ 2022b. Special Animals List. State of California Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Wildlife Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). October 2021.

Calflora. 2022. Information on California plants for education, research and conservation. [web application]. 2022. Berkeley, California: The Calflora Database [a non-profit organization].

Available: https://www.calflora.org/ (Accessed March 2022).

California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program. 2022. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (online edition, v8-03 0.39). Website http://www.rareplants.cnps.org [accessed March 2022].

San Luis Obispo County. San Luis Obispo County Municipal Code; Title 22 –Land Use Ordinance; Article 5 – Site Development Standards; Title 22; Chapter 22.56 Tree Preservation and Chapter 22.58 Oak Woodland Ordinance.

Sawyer, John O., Keeler-Wolf, Todd, Evens, Julie. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation Second Edition. California Native Plant Society. Berkeley, California.

Stebbins, Robert C. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, Third Edition.

Houghton Mifflin Company. New York, NY.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022a. Critical Habitat Portal. Retrieved from https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/table/critical-habitat.html. ------ 2022b. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Wetlands Mapper. Retrieved from https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/Mapper.html.

Attachment 9

Page 537 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

APPENDIX A
Site Photographs
Attachment 9

Page 538 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
Site Photographs
Photo 1. Representative view of Wild oats and annual brome grassland vegetation within the BSA.

Photo 2. Representative view of valley oak tree and Ornamental vegetation within the BSA.

Attachment 9

Page 539 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
Site Photographs
Photo 3. Ruderal area adjacent to Theater Drive.

Photo 4. Representative view of vegetated soil/gravel stockpile feature within the BSA.
~•1r SW .1,0 ~ .,J NW :no ~ J:J
I • I • I • I I I • I • I • I • I · I • I • I • I • I • I ·• I • I • I • I •· B · : 302 NW (T) POS· 35. 819u 120.697738 13
N NE Fjl 'SE; s
0 lO eo ;1 I~ 150 fl,O
l•l•l•l•l•l•l•l•l•i•!•l•l · l "l• [•l• l•I•
Attachment 9

Page 540 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Paso Robles Peterbilt Project
Biological Resources Assessment Report
April 2022 (2202-1101)
Site Photographs
Photo 5. Fenced drainage basin within the BSA.

Photo 6. View of storm drain and culvert to direct flow from Nutwood Circle into shallow drainage basin located off-site (north) of the Project Site. 150 ,~ .'lol SW I 211.0 ':'! 300 NW l:
• l•t • l• l •l •l 1 l 1 l • l • l•l • l•l • l •J •l • l • l • I B G: 236 { ) PDS~ 3 . · 78- 04"', -120.1698 6 · 119
E SE I s SW
IIO IIO IZO I J tSD 210 2ol0
•l • l•l • l•t • l•l•J•l•· t • l • l .. l•t•1•1~1•l•I
BR : 1499S , ( 1 POS: 35. 78570"'. -120.70 39 13 l
Attachment 9

Page 541 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

APPENDIX B
Plant List
Attachment 9

Page 542 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
List of Plant Species Observed
Paso Robles Peterbilt Biological Resources Assessment, Paso Robles, CA FAMILY Scientific Name Common Name Habit
Wetland
Indicator
Status
Native
Status
Cal-IPC
Rating
Listing
Status
ARALIACEAE Hedera helix English ivy PV FACU High
ASTERACEAE Baccharis pilularis Coyote brush S - N
Centaurea melitensis Tocalote AH - ModerateHeterotheca grandiflora Telegraph weed AH -Hypocharus glabra Smooth cat's ear AH - LimitedSilybum marianum Milk thistle A/PH - Limited Uropappus lindleyi Silverpuffs AH - N
BORAGINACEAE Amsinckia intermedia Common fiddleneck AH - N BRASSICACEAE Brassica nigra Black mustard AH - Moderate Raphanus sativus Wild radish AH - Limited
CONVOLVULACEAE Convolvulus arvensis Bindweed PH -CUPRESSACEAE Hesperocyparis macrocarpa* Monterey cypress T - N 1B.2 FABACEAE Vicia benghalensis Mediterranean vetch AH/V -
FAGACEAE Quercus agrifolia* Coast live oak T - N
Quercus lobata Valley oak T FACU N
GERANIACEAE Erodium cicutarium Redstem filaree AH - Limited MALVACEAE Malva parviflora Cheese-weed AH -POACEAE Avena barbata Slender wild oats AG - Moderate Avena fatua Wild oats AG - ModerateBromus diandrus Ripgut grass AG - ModerateBromus hordeaceus Soft chess AG FACU LimitedBromus madritensis ssp. rubens Red brome AG - HighFestuca myuros Rattail fescue AG FACU ModerateHordeum murinum ssp. leporinum Barley AG FACU POLYGONACEAE Rumex crispus Curly dock PH FAC Limited
PINACEAE Pinus radiata* Monterey pine T - N
Larix sp.* Larch T -
RUBIACEAE Galium aparine Bedstraw AH FACU N
Notes: Scientific nomenclature follows Baldwin (2012).* Planted as landscape treeN - Native speciesHabit definitions:AG - Annual grass.AH - Annual herb.F - FernPG - Perennial grass.

Updated April 2022
Attachment
9

Page 543 of 692 ends

List of Plant Species Observed
Paso Robles Peterbilt Biological Resources Assessment, Paso Robles, CA PH - Perennial herb.PV - Perennial vine.S - ShrubT - TreeOBL (Obligate Wetland Plants) - Almost always occur in wetlands.FACW (Facultative Wetland Plants) - Usually occur in wetland, but may occur in non-wetlands.FAC (Facultative Wetland Plants) - Occur in wetlands and non-wetlands.FACU (Facultative Upland Plants) - Usually occur in non-wetlands, but may occur in wetlands.UPL (Upland Plants) - Almost always occur in non-wetlands.

Listing Status:FE - Federally endangeredFT - Federally threatenedSE - State endangeredST - State threatenedCNPS (California Native Plant Society) Ranking System; CRPR (California Rare Plant Rank):1A - Plants presumed extirpated in California and either rare or extinct elsewhere1B - Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere2A - Plants presumed extirpated in California, but common elsewhere2B - Plants, rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere3 - Plants about which more information is needed – a review list4 - Plant of limited distribution – a watch listCRPR Threat Ranks:0.1 - Seriously threatened in California0.2 - Moderately threatened in California0.3 - Not very threatened in California Limited - These species are invasive but their ecological impacts are minor on a statewide level or there was not enough information to justify a higher score.Wetland indicator status (Lichvar and Kartesz, 2016): Cal-IPC (California Invasive Plant Council) Ratings:High - These species have severe ecological impacts on physical processes, plant and animal communities, and vegetation structure. Most are widely distributed ecologically.Moderate - These species have substantial and apparent-but generally not severe-ecological impacts on physical processes, plant and animal communities, and vegetation Updated April 2022
Attachment
9

Page 544 of 692 ends

APPENDIX C
Wildlife List
Attachment 9

Page 545 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Wildlife Species Observed within the BSA
2805 Theatre Drive, Paso Robles, California
Common Name Scientific Name Residence Status Protected Status Habitat Western fence lizard Sceloporus occidentalis R -- G, D, P, S, M Acorn woodpecker Melanerpes formicivorus R M P
California scrub-jay Aphelocoma californica R M R, G, P House finch Haemorhous mexicanus R M P, D, M
Mourning dove Zenaida macroura R M P, D, M
Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos R M S, G, D, M
Red-tailed hawk Buteo jamaicensis R M G, P, M
Turkey vulture Cathartes aura R M P, M
Yellow-rumped warbler Setophaga coronata R M P
Botta's pocket gopher Thomomys bottae R -- R, G, P
California ground squirrel Otospermophilus beecheyi R -- G, M, P Notes:

Fauna observed by visualizations, indirect signs (tracks, scat, skeletal remains, burros, etc.), and/or auditory cues.

Protected Status Typical Habitat
Residence Status A - Aquatic
R - Permanent resident D - Developed areas
W - Winter resident G - Grassland
B - Summer resident M - Multiple habitats
P - Woodland
R - Riparian
CS - Candidate species for CESA W - Wetland
C - Coastal lagoons, shores, oceans
O - Rock outcrops
S - Scrub
CSC - California Species of Special Concern
CFP - California Fully Protected Species
BCC - Bird of Conservation Concern (USFWS)
FE - Federal
FT - Federal threatened species
FC - Federal candidate species
M - Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Mammals
Birds
SE - State endangered species
ST - State threatened species
Reptiles
Updated November 2021 Page 1
Attachment 9

Page 546 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

APPENDIX D
CNDDB Results
Attachment 9

Page 547 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Elev. Element Occ. Ranks Population Status Presence
Name (Scientific/Common)
CNDDB
Ranks
Listing Status
(Fed/State) Other Lists
Range
(ft.)
Total
EO's A B C D X U
Historic
> 20 yr
Recent
<= 20 yr Extant
Poss.

Extirp. Extirp.

Abies bracteata
bristlecone fir
G2G3
S2S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.3
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
80 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Agelaius tricolor
tricolored blackbird
G1G2
S1S2
None
Threatened
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_EN-Endangered
NABCI_RWL-Red
Watch List
USFWS_BCC-Birds of
Conservation Concern
684
1,036
955
S:3
0 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 3 0 0
Agrostis hooveri
Hoover's bent grass
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,000
1,000
31 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Ammodramus savannarum
grasshopper sparrow
G5
S3
None
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
984
984
27 S:1
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Anniella pulchra
Northern California legless lizard
G3
S3
None
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
USFS_S-Sensitive
80 1,263
383
S:10
0 1 0 0 0 9 9 1 10 0 0
Antirrhinum ovatum
oval-leaved snapdragon
G3
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 4.2 720
720
16 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Query Criteria: Quad IS (Templeton (3512056) OR Paso Robles (3512066) OR Estrella (3512065) OR Creston (3512055) OR Santa Margarita (3512045) OR Atascadero (3512046) OR Morro Bay North (3512047) OR York Mountain (3512057) OR Adelaida (3512067)) AND Taxonomic Group IS (Dune OR Scrub OR Herbaceous OR Marsh OR Riparian OR Woodland OR Forest OR Alpine OR Inland Waters OR Marine OR Estuarine OR Riverine OR Palustrine OR Fish OR Amphibians OR Reptiles OR Birds OR Mammals OR Mollusks OR Arachnids OR Crustaceans OR Insects OR Ferns OR Gymnosperms OR Monocots OR Dicots OR Lichens OR Bryophytes OR Fungi) Report Printed on Friday, March 25, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 1 of 10 Information Expires 8/27/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Attachment 9

Page 548 of 692 ends

Extirp. Extirp.

Antrozous pallidus
pallid bat
G4
S3
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
USFS_S-Sensitive
WBWG_H-High
Priority
175
1,050
420
S:2
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0
Aquila chrysaetos
golden eagle
G5
S3
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDF_S-Sensitive
CDFW_FP-Fully
Protected
CDFW_WL-Watch List
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
USFWS_BCC-Birds of
Conservation Concern
720
1,340
324
S:2
1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0
Arctostaphylos luciana
Santa Lucia manzanita
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
SB_UCSC-UC Santa
Cruz
USFS_S-Sensitive
2,700
2,700
10 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Arctostaphylos pilosula
Santa Margarita manzanita
G2?
S2?
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
955
1,400
58 S:4
1 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 4 0 0
Ardea herodias
great blue heron
G5
S4
None
None
CDF_S-Sensitive
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
996
996
156
S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Astragalus didymocarpus var. milesianus
Miles' milk-vetch
G5T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2 1,250
1,250
16 S:3
0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0
Atractelmis wawona
Wawona riffle beetle
G3
S1S2
None
None
231
231
80 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Batrachoseps minor
lesser slender salamander
G1
S1
None
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_DD-Data
Deficient
USFS_S-Sensitive
895
1,376
8 S:7
0 0 0 0 0 7 1 6 7 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, March 25, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 2 of 10 Information Expires 8/27/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
r, = .. ~
::~ I:~- Attachment 9

Page 549 of 692 ends

Extirp. Extirp.

Bombus caliginosus
obscure bumble bee
G4?
S1S2
None
None
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable 1,200
1,200
181
S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Bombus crotchii
Crotch bumble bee
G3G4
S1S2
None
None
900
1,300
437
S:3
0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0
Branchinecta lynchi
vernal pool fairy shrimp
G3
S3
Threatened
None
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable 725
1,125
795
S:6
0 2 3 1 0 0 4 2 6 0 0
Buteo regalis
ferruginous hawk
G4
S3S4
None
None
CDFW_WL-Watch List
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
USFWS_BCC-Birds of
Conservation Concern
995
995
107
S:1
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Calochortus obispoensis
San Luis mariposa-lily
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,300
1,700
46 S:3
0 1 0 0 0 2 0 3 3 0 0
Calochortus simulans
La Panza mariposa-lily
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.3
SB_CRES-San Diego
Zoo CRES Native
Gene Seed Bank
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,000
1,600
109
S:14
0 5 2 3 0 4 4 10 14 0 0
Calycadenia villosa
dwarf calycadenia
G3
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
984
1,130
59 S:4
0 2 0 0 0 2 4 0 4 0 0
Camissoniopsis hardhamiae
Hardham's evening-primrose
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,100
1,600
22 S:7
3 3 0 0 0 1 6 1 7 0 0
Carex obispoensis
San Luis Obispo sedge
G3?
S3?
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,600
2,500
29 S:3
1 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 3 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, March 25, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 3 of 10 Information Expires 8/27/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
r, = .. ~
::~ I:~- Attachment 9

Page 550 of 692 ends

Extirp. Extirp.

Castilleja densiflora var. obispoensis
San Luis Obispo owl's-clover
G5T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2 75
1,580
69 S:7
0 1 2 0 0 4 3 4 7 0 0
Caulanthus lemmonii
Lemmon's jewelflower
G3
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,000
1,000
91 S:4
0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0
Charadrius nivosus nivosus
western snowy plover
G3T3
S2
Threatened
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
NABCI_RWL-Red
Watch List
USFWS_BCC-Birds of
Conservation Concern
10 10
138
S:2
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
Chorizanthe breweri
Brewer's spineflower
G3
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.3
BLM_S-Sensitive
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,000
2,500
45 S:7
2 0 0 0 0 5 4 3 7 0 0
Chorizanthe rectispina
straight-awned spineflower
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,000
1,900
38 S:10
2 1 1 0 0 6 7 3 10 0 0
Cicindela hirticollis gravida
sandy beach tiger beetle
G5T2
S2
None
None
10 10
34 S:2
0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1
Cirsium fontinale var. obispoense
Chorro Creek bog thistle
G2T2
S2
Endangered
Endangered
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
1,000
1,000
22 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Cirsium occidentale var. lucianum
Cuesta Ridge thistle
G3G4T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2 9
S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Coelus globosus
globose dune beetle
G1G2
S1S2
None
None
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable 10
10 50
S:2
0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Report Printed on Friday, March 25, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 4 of 10 Information Expires 8/27/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
r, = .. ~
::~ I:~- Attachment 9

Page 551 of 692 ends

Extirp. Extirp.

Corynorhinus townsendii
Townsend's big-eared bat
G4
S2
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
USFS_S-Sensitive
WBWG_H-High
Priority
1,000
1,000
635
S:1
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Danaus plexippus pop. 1
monarch - California overwintering population
G4T2T3
S2S3
Candidate
None
USFS_S-Sensitive 15
40 383
S:2
0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0
Delphinium parryi ssp. blochmaniae
dune larkspur
G4T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2 27
S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Delphinium parryi ssp. eastwoodiae
Eastwood's larkspur
G4T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2 900
900
15 S:2
0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0
Delphinium umbraculorum
umbrella larkspur
G3
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.3
BLM_S-Sensitive
USFS_S-Sensitive
95 S:3
0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0
Dudleya abramsii ssp. bettinae
Betty's dudleya
G4T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
170
820
14 S:7
0 3 1 1 0 2 4 3 7 0 0
Dudleya abramsii ssp. murina
mouse-gray dudleya
G4T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.3
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
330
1,600
36 S:3
0 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 3 0 0
Dudleya blochmaniae ssp. blochmaniae
Blochman's dudleya
G3T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
30 562
81 S:8
0 1 0 0 0 7 3 5 8 0 0
Elanus leucurus
white-tailed kite
G5
S3S4
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_FP-Fully
Protected
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
1,165
1,240
180
S:2
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, March 25, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 5 of 10 Information Expires 8/27/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
r, = .. ~
::~ I:~- Attachment 9

Page 552 of 692 ends

Extirp. Extirp.

Emys marmorata
western pond turtle
G3G4
S3
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable
USFS_S-Sensitive
10 1,464
1404
S:27
2 14 4 0 0 7 10 17 27 0 0
Eriastrum luteum
yellow-flowered eriastrum
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
USFS_S-Sensitive
860
1,900
34 S:12
3 1 1 0 0 7 6 6 12 0 0
Erigeron blochmaniae
Blochman's leafy daisy
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
15 15
36 S:1
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Eucyclogobius newberryi
tidewater goby
G3
S3
Endangered
None
AFS_EN-Endangered
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable
20 20
127
S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Extriplex joaquinana
San Joaquin spearscale
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
127
S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Fritillaria ojaiensis
Ojai fritillary
G3
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,200
1,200
49 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Helminthoglypta walkeriana
Morro shoulderband (=banded dune) snail
G1
S1S2
Threatened
None
IUCN_CR-Critically
Endangered
10 10
14 S:1
0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Horkelia cuneata var. puberula
mesa horkelia
G4T1
S1
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1
USFS_S-Sensitive
820
875
103
S:3
0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0
Horkelia cuneata var. sericea
Kellogg's horkelia
G4T1?
S1?
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1
SB_UCSC-UC Santa
Cruz
USFS_S-Sensitive
600
1,140
58 S:3
0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0
Icaricia icarioides moroensis
Morro Bay blue butterfly
G5T2
S2
None
None
25 80
12 S:2
0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0
Juncus luciensis
Santa Lucia dwarf rush
G3
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
USFS_S-Sensitive
984
984
37 S:3
0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, March 25, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 6 of 10 Information Expires 8/27/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
r, = .. ~
::~ I:~- Attachment 9

Page 553 of 692 ends

Extirp. Extirp.

Layia jonesii
Jones' layia
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
USFS_S-Sensitive
200
522
25 S:8
0 0 0 0 0 8 3 5 8 0 0
Lepidium jaredii ssp. jaredii
Jared's pepper-grass
G2G3T1T2
S1S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
12 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Linderiella occidentalis
California linderiella
G2G3
S2S3
None
None
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened
968
1,076
508
S:5
0 4 0 0 0 1 0 5 5 0 0
Malacothamnus palmeri var. palmeri
Santa Lucia bush-mallow
G3T2Q
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
850
1,000
10 S:2
0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0
Meconella oregana
Oregon meconella
G2G3
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1 1,200
1,200
9 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Monardella palmeri
Palmer's monardella
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,600
1,600
24 S:2
0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0
Monolopia gracilens
woodland woollythreads
G3
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2 68
S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Navarretia fossalis
spreading navarretia
G2
S2
Threatened
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
SB_CRES-San Diego
Zoo CRES Native
Gene Seed Bank
1,100
1,100
82 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Navarretia nigelliformis ssp. radians
shining navarretia
G4T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
700
1,571
102
S:12
0 0 5 0 0 7 6 6 12 0 0
Neotoma macrotis luciana
Monterey dusky-footed woodrat
G5T3
S3
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_DD-Data
Deficient
988
1,700
8 S:3
2 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 3 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, March 25, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 7 of 10 Information Expires 8/27/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
r, = .. ~
::~ I:~- Attachment 9

Page 554 of 692 ends

Extirp. Extirp.

Northern Interior Cypress Forest
Northern Interior Cypress Forest
G2
S2.2
None
None
2,400
2,400
22 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus pop. 9
steelhead - south-central California coast
DPS
G5T2Q
S2
Threatened
None
AFS_TH-Threatened 200
400
41 S:3
0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 3 0 0
Perognathus inornatus psammophilus
Salinas pocket mouse
G2G3T2?
S1
None
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
1,220
1,225
9 S:3
2 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 3 0 0
Phrynosoma blainvillii
coast horned lizard
G3G4
S3S4
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
25 25
784
S:1
0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Plagiobothrys uncinatus
hooked popcornflower
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,780
1,780
14 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Polyphylla nubila
Atascadero June beetle
G1
S1
None
None
800
900
4 S:3
0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0
Progne subis
purple martin
G5
S3
None
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
915
915
71 S:1
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Pyrgulopsis taylori
San Luis Obispo pyrg
G1
S1
None
None
880
880
5 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Rana boylii
foothill yellow-legged frog
G3
S3
None
Endangered
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,010
1,010
2476
S:1
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
Rana draytonii
California red-legged frog
G2G3
S2S3
Threatened
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable
10 1,684
1671
S:21
4 10 1 3 1 2 11 10 20 1 0
Senecio aphanactis
chaparral ragwort
G3
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 2B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
SB_CRES-San Diego
Zoo CRES Native
Gene Seed Bank
536
536
98 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, March 25, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 8 of 10 Information Expires 8/27/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
r, = .. ~
::~ I:~- Attachment 9

Page 555 of 692 ends

Extirp. Extirp.

Sidalcea hickmanii ssp. anomala
Cuesta Pass checkerbloom
G3T1
S1
None
Rare
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
2,500
2,500
4 S:1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Spea hammondii
western spadefoot
G2G3
S3
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened
764
1,591
1422
S:21
2 4 9 2 0 4 9 12 21 0 0
Streptanthus albidus ssp. peramoenus
most beautiful jewelflower
G2T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
SB_UCBG-UC
Botanical Garden at
Berkeley
USFS_S-Sensitive
103
S:2
0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0
Suaeda californica
California seablite
G1
S1
Endangered
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1 18
S:1
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Taricha torosa
Coast Range newt
G4
S4
None
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
965
1,700
88 S:9
1 3 0 1 0 4 3 6 9 0 0
Taxidea taxus
American badger
G5
S3
None
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
670
1,055
594
S:16
14 2 0 0 0 0 14 2 16 0 0
Trimerotropis occulens
Lompoc grasshopper
G1G2
S1S2
None
None
IUCN_EN-Endangered 900
900
8 S:1
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
Valley Oak Woodland
Valley Oak Woodland
G3
S2.1
None
None
1,060
2,000
91 S:6
0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0
Vireo bellii pusillus
least Bell's vireo
G5T2
S2
Endangered
Endangered
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened
NABCI_YWL-Yellow
Watch List
660
710
503
S:2
1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, March 25, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 9 of 10 Information Expires 8/27/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
r, = .. ~
::~ I:~- Attachment 9

Page 556 of 692 ends

Extirp. Extirp.

Vulpes macrotis mutica
San Joaquin kit fox
G4T2
S2
Endangered
Threatened
658
1,049
1020
S:17
2 0 0 1 0 14 16 1 17 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, March 25, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 10 of 10 Information Expires 8/27/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Attachment 9

Page 557 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY SURVEY
AT 2805 THEATRE DRIVE, PASO ROBLES,

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
[APN: 009-851-022]
Prepared for:

Coast Counties Peterbilt
1740 No. 4th Street
San Jose, CA 95116
Prepared by:

Nancy Farrell
Cultural Resource Management Services
829 Paso Robles Street
Paso Robles, California 93446
Templeton 7.5' Quadrangle
May, 2022
CRMS Project No. 56-2027
Attachment 9

Page 558 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

INTRODUCTION
At the request of Craig Archer, Cultural Resource Management Services (CRMS) has conducted a literature and records search and intensive archaeological survey of a parcel at 2805 Theatre Drive, Paso Robles. This will be the new business location of the Central Coast Peterbilt dealership. The purpose of this investigation is to identify any cultural resources present on the parcel that may be affected by the proposed construction. This work was completed in order to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the County of San Luis Obispo (Figure 1, 2, and 3).

CEQA requires lead agencies to evaluate proposed projects for their potential to impact archaeological resources (Public Resources Code Section 21082, 21083.2, and 21084.1, and California Code of Regulations 15064.5). According to the CEQA Guidelines, “historical resources” include buildings, structures, objects, districts, or sites that may possess prehistoric or historical archaeological, architectural, cultural, or scientific importance. CEQA states that if a project will have a significant effect on important cultural resources, then alternative plans or mitigation measures need to be developed. were conducted to identify and evaluate any significant prehistoric or historic cultural resources that might be impacted by the proposed construction (Exhibit A).

In addition, as part of an early participation notice, letters were sent to Native American tribes, organizations and individuals. The list of recipients was provided by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and is comprised of those groups and individuals thought to have a cultural interest in this area, notifying them of the proposed project, inviting them to consult, and requesting information or concerns regarding the proposed project. A Sacred Lands Search was conducted at the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Concurrent with that search, Native Americans and Native American groups cited by the NAHC were contacted. There was one responses to the letters written, noted specifically in Exhibit B. -1-
Attachment 9

Page 559 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Figure 1: Vicinity Map (No Scale)
-2-
Attachment 9

Page 560 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Figure 2: Portion of USGS 7.5' Quadrangle-Templeton, CA -3-
Attachment 9

Page 561 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Figure 3: Assessor’s Parcel Map-Parcel Shown In Red Outline -4-
Attachment 9

Page 562 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT
The project area consists of a ± 7 acre property at the southern corporate limit of of the City of El Paso de Robles, California, west of Highway 101 (Figure 1). Paso Robles lies on a terrace above the western bank of the Salinas River that grades into the hilly flanks of the Santa Lucia Range.

Climate
The weather pattern is characterized by hot, dry summers and cool, moist winters. Every several years, extreme frosts occur during winter months, but generally the area experiences 300 to 325 frost-free days per year. Such a setting is eminently suitable for human habitation.

Geology and Pedology
The Paso Robles area presents a complex geologic picture, underlain by the 4.3 million year old Paso Robles Formation. Sandstones, siltstone, diatomite and conglomerates are characteristic rocks. Beds of fossil pecten and oyster shells from the 5-7 million year old Santa Margarita Formation are also present in some locations (Chipping 1987:VIII-7). The grey-brown soil of the project area is Lockwood shaly loam (Lindsey 1983: 45), deep well-drained soils that formed in material weathered from sedimentary rocks.

Water Sources
Annual rainfall ranges from 12 to 20 inches. Today, the Salinas River, a half-mile to the east, flows at the surface only during seasons of heavy rainfall, but the river flow was more abundant and regular during the time of prehistoric human occupation of the area. The surface flow has been reduced to a minimum in recent years by the many municipal and private wells which draw water from the river for residential and agricultural use, as well as the construction of the Santa Margarita Dam in the early 1940s. There are natural springs in the area, both warm sulphur springs and fresh water (Chapman et al. 1980: 15).

Vegetation
The regional vegetation is melange of oak savanna, oak woodland and chaparral plant communities with a riparian component. Commonly occurring species are: Valley -5-
Attachment 9

Page 563 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
oak (Quercus lobata), interior live oak (Quercus wizlizenii), chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), California lilac (Ceanothus spp.) and coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis).

Along the creeks is a riparian community where western sycamore (Platanus racemosa), willow (Salix sp.), cottonwood (Populus fremontii), White alder (Alnus Rhombifolia), Poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum), Blackberry (Rubus ursinus), Poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), and elderberry (Sambucus mexicana) are common. On the project property, vegetation now consists primarily of a few specimens of valley oak, California poppies and a variety of weedy forbs and grasses.

Fauna
Fauna commonly occurring in the surrounding area include black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus), coyote (Canis latrans), black-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus californicus), cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagus spp.), black bear (Ursus americanus) and historically, grizzly bear (Ursus horribilis) and tule elk (Cervus elaphus nannoides). A number of ground squirrels (Spermophilus spp.), the western gray squirrel (Sciurus griseus), gophers (Thomomys spp.), mice (Microtus spp. and Peromyscus spp.), and a variety of reptiles and amphibians are also present.

Common birds in the area include red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), California scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), western meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta), mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) and turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), acorn woodpecker (Melanerpes formicuvorus), and valley quail (Lophortyx californicus).

CULTURAL BACKGROUND
Archaeological Background
Archaeological evidence indicates that the San Luis Obispo County region was occupied as early as 8000-9000 years ago, as indicated by radiocarbon dates from excavations at Diablo Canyon (Greenwood 1972), Edna Valley (Fitzgerald 2000), Cambria (Gibson 1979) and Paso Robles (Stevens et al. 2004). The cultural history of this region has until recently been placed within the sequence that has been defined for the Santa Barbara region, where far more archaeological investigations had taken place.

The first regional chronology was proposed by D.B. Rogers (1929) and was based on his -6-
Attachment 9

Page 564 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
excavation of coastal sites around Santa Barbara. This three-part sequence of Early Oak Grove or Millingstone Culture, Intermediate or Hunting People and a late Canaliño Culture is still considered generally valid in terms of broad cultural patterns (Fitzgerald and Jones 1998).

Researchers on the Central Coast have continued to refine the chronological framework and several alternative schemes have been proposed, primarily based on sites in the Central Valley, Central Coast and Channel Islands (cf. Moratto 1984: 125; King 1990; Erlandson and Jones, 2002; Jones et al. 2007). The following chronology for the San Luis Obispo area builds on this work and incorporates extensive investigations carried out on the Pecho Coast, south of San Luis Obispo (Jones and Codding 2019). All dates are radiocarbon calibrated dates:
. Paleoindian 10,000 BCE - 8350 BCE
Millingstone/ Lower Archaic 8350 BCE - 3500 BCE
Early 3500 BCE - 600 BCE
Middle 600 BCE - 1000 CE
Middle/Late Transition 1000 CE- 1230 CE
Late 1230 CE - 1769 CE
Mission Period 1769 CE - 1830 CE
These periods are based upon shifts in technology that relate to the type and variety of foods consumed, methods of procurement, and social structure. The earliest periods were a time of hunting and gathering, with an emphasis on seed collecting and processing. The tool kit for these periods shows an emphasis on milling equipment and crude cores yielding flaked stone tools. An increased reliance on fishing (evidenced by fishhooks), and on acorns as a dietary staple (mortars and pestles), was indicated later by the addition of new tools.

Paleoindian (10,000 BCE - 8350 BCE)
Excavations on the northern Channel Islands have yielded radiocarbon dates as early as 12,500 years ago (Erlandson and Braje 2011). There is still very limited information for the Paleoindian period in the Central Coast mainland region.

Millingstone Period (8350 BC–3500 BC)
-7-
Attachment 9

Page 565 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
More substantive archaeological evidence exists for the Millingstone Period, as evidenced by radiocarbon dates from excavations conducted at Diablo Canyon (Greenwood 1972), Cambria (Gibson 1979) Edna Valley (Fitzgerald et. al 1998) and Paso Robles (Stevens et.al 2004). It was during this period that permanent settlements with associated cemeteries were established. This basic adaptation persisted until about 3500 BC and was characterized by milling slabs, manos (handstones), rather crude cobble tools and a high density of marine shellfish remains on the coast. Collection of seeds appears to have been important for diet.

Early Period (3500 BCE – 600 BCE)
Along the coast and in interior areas, the Early period is marked by the appearance of mortars and pestles and contracting-stemmed projectile points (Jones 1993). Other artifacts found with Early period occupations are also found in Millingstone period sites, including Olivella (Callianax biplicata) class L beads, large side-notched projectile points, and milling slabs and handstones. Large projectile points and stone knives are indicative of hunting activity. Milling implements consisting of manos and metates were evidence of the processing of seeds, and possibly vegetable foods, dried meats, and fish. Greater numbers of sites are known from the Early period, possibly signaling a population increase. The end of this period is marked by changes in technology with the decrease of manos and metates, a shift in the settlement pattern, and alterations in ornamental style.

Middle Period (600 BCE – 1000 CE)
Mortars and pestles become larger and more common during this period and small seeds become less important as a staple. Exotic products are adopted. This period heralds the advent of social and political alliances and economic networks to regulate food supplies and their distribution in order to alleviate conditions resulting from regional fluctuations in the harvest. Some villages grew larger and less defensive in nature as populations were integrated into larger political units. The end of this period is marked by dramatic changes in economic, social, and political conditions, evidenced by new habitation sites and larger coastal fishing communities.

The Middle period is well represented at recorded sites along the central coast and increasingly in interior regions as well. The types of artifacts found in Middle period occupations are similar to those from the Early period although a larger number -8-
Attachment 9

Page 566 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
of bone implements and bead types are known and projectile points tend to be contracting-stemmed types instead of side-notched and square-stemmed (Olsen and Payen 1969; Bennyhoff and Hughes 1987; Jones and Waugh 1995). Excavations at Fort Hunter-Liggett have shown that Middle period occupations in that area resemble those found along the coast (Jones and Haney 1997).

Middle/Late Transition Period (1000 CE – 1230 CE)
Around 1,000 AD a 300-year period of warmer temperatures and drier climate, the Medieval Climatic Anomaly, caused adverse environmental conditions, particularly intermittent droughts (Raab and Larson 1997). During the Late Period, terrestrial resource production is thought to have decreased significantly, while adaptive responses involving technology and social complexity evolved. Characteristic artifacts include curved shell fishhooks, mortars with attached basket hopper, contractingstemmed and double side-notched projectile points. The bow and arrow was introduced.

Late Period (1230 CE - 1769 CE)
This period is marked by a more mobile, dispersed settlement pattern than earlier periods (Jones et al. 2015: 15), an increasing dependence on acorns and other storable commodities, and a general diversification of the marine and terrestrial foods consumed. Late period assemblages from the interior south coast ranges are distinguished by a suite of new bead types, small side-notched and triangular arrow points, and hopper mortars as well as many artifact types found in earlier periods (Olsen and Payen 1969). At Fort Hunter Liggett, Late period occupations also included small arrow points, new bead types, as well as bedrock mortars and unshaped pestles (Jones 2000; Haney et al. 2002). The Late period assemblages from a wide area of the central coast and interior regions appear superficially similar, but this was probably a time of continued cultural differentiation due to higher population densities.

Mission Period (1769 CE - 1830 CE )
Glass trade beads, square nails and bottle glass begin to appear in the archaeological matrix (Meighan 1979; Moratto 1984: 273). -9-
Attachment 9

Page 567 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Ethnographic Overview
At the time of European contact, the Paso Robles region was primarily occupied by a branch of the northern-most Chumash, the Obispeño (Kroeber 1925). This group inhabited coastal and inland areas between Malibu and the vicinity of San Simeon (Kroeber 1925; Gibson 1983). Also present in the region historically were the Migueleño Salinan (Greenwood 1978). The Salinan were bordered by the Esselen and Costanoan to the north, Yokuts to the east and the Chumash to the south. Examination of mission records reveals that members of the Salinan Nation inter-married into the northern portion of San Luis Obispo County, including the Paso Robles area. The exact boundary of these two groups has not been well established and is the subject of continuing research on the part of ethno-historians, archaeologists, and some Salinan and Chumash descendants.

The economies of the Salinan and the Chumash, as observed at the time of European contact, were based upon an annual cycle of gathering and hunting (Geiger and Meighan 1976). Vegetal foods, especially acorns, provided the bulk of the diet.

Acorns were stored in large willow-twig granaries until needed, then ground in a stone mortar. The tannic acid present in the acorn meal was leached out with water, and the result was cooked into a gruel. Other important plant foods included wild grass and other hard seeds, roots and corms, and various fruits and berries. Major animal foods included an assortment of terrestrial mammals, marine and freshwater fish, shellfish, birds, as well as reptiles and insects. It is unclear to what extent people living inland ventured to the coast and vice versa, but it is likely that people were mobile enough to take advantage of plant and animal foods when and where they occurred. Diets would have varied from season to season, and from year to year, depending on what was available and accessible.

Stone, bone, wood, plant fibers and shell all provided materials for the production of tools. Hunting of animals and birds was accomplished with snares, traps, spears, darts, and the during the Late Period, bow and arrow. Stone work included projectile points, knives, scrapers, choppers and awls. Pecked and ground stone objects included bowl mortars, pestles, metates, basket mortars, stone bowls, notched pebble net sinkers, and steatite arrow shaft straighteners. Ornaments were made of steatite and serpentine. Bone and shell tools were also manufactured; especially bone awls and C- -10-
Attachment 9

Page 568 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
shaped fishhooks. Shell beads of mussel and abalone were the basis of the Salinan "currency", with value being assigned based on the color or the shell (Hester 1978: 502).

Historic Overview
European contact in the San Luis Obispo County region may have begun as early as 1587 with the visit of Pedro de Unamuno to Morro Bay, although some scholars have questioned this based on the ambiguity of Unamuno's descriptions (Mathes 1968). A visit in 1595 by Sebastian Rodriguez Cermeño is better documented (Wagner 1924). The earliest well-documented descriptions come from accounts by members of Gaspar de Portola's land expedition, which passed through the region in 1769 (Squibb 1984).

No large villages, such as those seen along the Santa Barbara channel, were reported by early travelers in the San Luis Obispo region.

Permanent Spanish settlement of the region began with the founding of Mission San Antonia de Padua (near King City) in 1771 and San Luis Obispo de Tolosa (in San Luis Obispo) in 1772. Twenty-five years later, Mission San Miguel Archangel was founded in the heart of southern Salinan territory. The mission properties of San Miguel mission were extensive and included an outlying rancho station, Las Gallinas, near present day Paso Robles (Ohles 1997).

As elsewhere, induction into the mission system had a devastating effect on the local inhabitants, requiring them to live and work at the mission and to a great extent abandon their former lifeways. The inadvertent introduction of European diseases, the consequent high mortality rate, and the pressure of overwhelming social change decimated the population. By 1805, most native villages had been abandoned, and the populace had either fled or moved into the mission system (Gibson 1983). The natives who had survived the Spanish colonization period, went on to build and staff the rancheros of the Mexican and American periods which followed. By the beginning of the 20th Century, the Chumash and Salinan had been integrated into American society (Gibson 1983; King 1984, 1990).

In 1822, Mexico attained independence of Spain and California became a Mexican territory. The Secularization Act, passed by the Mexican congress in 1833, provided for the immediate break-up of the missions and the transfer of mission lands to settlers and Indians. Work toward this end began in 1834 under Governor Figueroa. -11-
Attachment 9

Page 569 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Grants were made to individuals by the governor on the recommendation of the local alcalde of the Mission (Shumway 2007). During the years from 1840 to 1846, a series of land grants were made from the lands of Mission San Miguel by the governors of Mexican California. Most of these were used for grazing huge cattle herds. Even after the acquisition of California by the United States the ranchos continued to thrive until the drought of 1863 - 1864. This drought was ruinous to many of the ranchos. Tens of thousands of acres changes hands as lands sold for less than their assessed value (Angel 1883; Morrison & Haydon 1917). The new owners were most often North Americans who arrived on the heels of the drought as land prices plummeted.

The project area was a portion of the 26,000 acre rancho El Paso de los Robles, granted May 12, 1844 to Pedro Navarez by Mexican Governor Manuel Micheltorena. In 1848 the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo marked an end to the Mexican American war and California became a territory of the United States. Statehood was attained in 1850 and in 1851 the Land Act, passed by Congress, meant that the rancheros now had to prove ownership of their land. A patent on the El Paso de los Robles was obtained July 20, 1866 by Petronillo Rios. Prior to the patent, however, the parcel had been sold in two separate transactions, first to Daniel and James Blackburn on September 21, 1858.

The second portion was sold July 9, 1861 to Lazarus Godchaux. They immediately began making improvements to the hot sulphur springs which had been used by local inhabitants for generations. The location had long been a rest stop for travelers on the El Camino Real. In 1864 the El Paso de Robles Hotel with attendant mineral hot spring bathhouse, was built. By the 1870s, the Paso Robles Hot Springs was a well known destination for people seeking the famous curative powers of the springs (Sawyer 1915).

The West Coast Land Co. was incorporated on March 27, 1886. The immediate objective was to develop 64,000 acres of land, comprised of the ranchos Santa Ysabel, El Paso de Robles, Eureka, and the unsold portion of Huer Huero that had been purchase over the preceding decade. The purchases were based upon the expectation that the Southern Pacific Railroad coastal line between San Francisco and Los Angeles through San Luis Obispo County would bring prosperity to the region (Nicholson 1980). A town plan for Paso Robles, on the western side of the Salinas River, was commissioned, and on November 17, 1886, two weeks after the first train arrived in “town” a Grand Auction was held, resulting in the sale of 228 lots. The town plan was completed by 1887 and the town was incorporated as a city in 1889. The trickle of settlers became a -12-
Attachment 9

Page 570 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
flood and Paso Robles became a major export center for cattle, grain, dairy products, stone fruit, walnuts, and almonds. Throughout the later part of the nineteenth and the twentieth century, the economy of the Paso Robles region was largely agricultural.

Cattle ranches, dairies, almond and other fruit orchards, and large tracts devoted to dry land grain production comprised the rural landscape. This resulted in the clearing of much of the Oak woodland, including the present project area ( Rossi 1979: 258). During the mid twentieth century, Paso Robles was known as "The Almond Capital of the World." Much of the region around Paso Robles
In 1882, York Mountain Vineyard opened, eventually becoming one of the first bonded wineries on the Central Coast. Agriculture has continued to be the mainstay of the region up to the present, with increasing emphasis on viticulture and wine-making.

The proliferation of wineries in the last 30 years has also lead to tourism once again becoming a major component of the local economy.

MAP AND RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS
Prior to the field survey, a records and literature search was conducted at the Central Coast Information Center, Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, which is the regional clearinghouse for archaeological site information for San Luis Obispo County under agreement with the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP).

The search also included inventories for the State Historic Property Data Files, National Register of Historic Places, National Register of Determined Eligible Properties, California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historic Interest, California OHP Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, and the CalTrans State and Local Bridge Surveys.

Seven cultural resource studies have been conducted within a 1/4 mile radius of the project area (Bonner 2004; Clift and Farrell 2001; Farrell 1998; Gibson 1973; Girado and Orfila 2008; Singer 2004, 2006). No prehistoric archaeological sites or historic properties have been identified within the same radius. -13-
Attachment 9

Page 571 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

SUMMARY OF NATIVE AMERICAN OUTREACH
A letter was sent on March 6, 2022, to the Project Analyst at the Native American Heritage Commission. The letter explained the proposed project and asked him to conduct a Sacred Lands Search and forward to CRMS any names and addresses of those who may have knowledge of cultural resources within the study area, or who would like to comment on the project.

On April 24, 2022 a letter dated the same day, was received from Cody Campagne, Project Analyst, indicating that the Sacred Lands Search conducted at the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) yielded no evidence of Sacred Lands with the project. A list of interested Native American individuals and groups was included. Letters, explaining the project and soliciting comments were sent to each of the Native Americans and groups listed (Exhibit B). On Aril 25, 2022, letters were written to the Native Americans and groups listed by the NAHC explaining the project, and asking for their comments.

RESULTS OF FIELD INVESTIGATION
A field reconnaissance of the project area was made on April 20, 2022 by Nancy Farrell and Ron Rose of CRMS. The entire surface was inspected by walking parallel transects at two meter intervals. Mineral soil visibility was variable but generally good (50%). Additionally, the abundant ground burrow spoil piles provided additional visibility No evidence of prehistoric or historic artifacts, features, or other indications of significant cultural resources were found during the survey. (Figure 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8).

There was evidence of a previous water hookup and a telephone pole, no evidence of a building structure was found. An examination of aerial photos from the 1970s yielded no additional information. There was a sewer manhole. A check with the City Wastewater Treatment Department showed no sewer hookup in that location. Further examination with the cover removed showed that the manhole was never developed, but abandoned. Apparently a previous property owner had some plans for future development. Also on the property is a fenced detention basin approximately 80 feet square. This detention may be used for the present development or abandoned. -14-
Attachment 9

Page 572 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Figure 4: Portion of Templeton USGS Quadrangle. Red Dot Is Location of Abandoned Manhole. Black Polygon Is Location of Existing Detention Basin. 1979 Quadrangle Shows A Structure of Some Kind Indicated In Black Next To Abandoned Manhole.
-15-
-- ■
·. .· ·RTY
rr
I
- - ABA- DO- ED S:EW1
Attachment 9

Page 573 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Figure 5: Overview of Subject Parcel-View To East
Figure 6: Overview of Subject Parcel-View Northeast
-16-
Attachment 9

Page 574 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Figure 7: Overview of Subject Parcel-View To South
Figure 8: Overview of Subject Property-View To West
-17-
Attachment 9

Page 575 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Since no evidence of significant cultural resources was located on the subject property, no further archaeological investigations are recommended at this time. While it is unlikely that subsurface remains are present, the nature of surface survey does not preclude the possible existence of such remains. If prehistoric or historic cultural materials are encountered during any phase of property grading or development the work should be halted until a qualified archaeologist can make an assessment of the resources and proper mitigation measures be formulated, if necessary. -18-
Attachment 9

Page 576 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

REFERENCES CITED
Angel, Myron
1883 History of San Luis Obispo County, California. Thompson & West, Oakland. Facsimile Reproduction, Valley Publishers, Fresno. 1979.

Bennyhoff, J. A., and R. E. Hughes
1987 Shell Beads and Ornament Exchange Networks Between California and the Western Great Basin. American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers 64 (2).

Bonner, W.
2004 Cultural Resource Records Search and Site Visit for Cingulat Telecommunications Facility Candidate VY-553-01 (Hwy 101 and 46). Michael Brandman Associates Brown, A. K.
1967 The Aboriginal Population of the Santa Barbara Channel. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports 69: 1-99. Berkeley.

Chapman, Rodger, Gordon W. Chase, and Les G. Youngs
1980 Geophysical Survey, Paso Robles Geothermal Area, California Part of the Resource Assessment of Low-and Moderate-Temperature Geothermal Resource Areas in California. Submitted to U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Geothermal Energy.

California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Conservation.

Chipping, David
1987 The Geology of San Luis Obispo County: A Brief Description and Field Guide.

Clift, Gregory and Nancy Farrell
2001 Phase 1 Archaeological Inventory for the Graff Groundwater well site near Ramada Drive, Templeton, San Luis Obispo county, California. Cultural Resource Management Services.

Dart, Louisiana Clayton
1978 Vignettes of History in San Luis Obispo County. Mission Federal Savings. San Luis Obispo, California.

Erlandson, Jon and Todd Braje
2011 From Asia to the Americas by Boat? Paleogeography, paleoecology, and stemmed points of the Northwest Pacific. Quaternary International 239: 28-37.

Erlandson Jon M. and Terry L. Jones, editors
2002 Catalysts to Complexity, Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Volume 6. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, UCLA.

Farrell, Nancy
1998 Phase 1 Cultural Resources Survey of the Boatman Property (APN 009-851-007 & 009) Paso Robles, California. Cultural Resources Management Services -19-
Attachment 9

Page 577 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Fitzgerald, Richard T.
2000 Cross Creek: An Early Holocene/Millingstone Site. California State Water Project, Coastal Branch Series Paper No. 12. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society.

Fitzgerald, Richard T. and Terry L. Jones
1998 Interpretive Synthesis of Subsurface Archaeological Investigations for the Coastal Branch Phase II Project. Appendix G in Archaeological Data Recovery at CA-SLO-1797, the Cross Creek Site, San Luis Obispo County, California, Coastal Branch, Phase II Project.

Submitted to California Department of Water Resources. Garcia and Associates, San Anselmo.

Geiger, M. and Clement Meighan
1976 As the Padres Saw Them: California Indian Life and Customs as Reported by the Franciscan Missionaries, 1813 -1815. Santa Barbara Mission Archive Library. Santa Barbara.

Gibson, Robert O.
1973 Archaeological Element of Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Development of the Durand Property, San Luis Obispo County, California. 1979 Preliminary Inventory and Assessment of Indian Cultural Resources at Lodge Hill, Cambria, San Luis Obispo County, California. On file at the Central Coastal Information Center.
1981 Archaeological Element of Environmental Impact Report for the Holsted Subdivision, Parcel Map CO-80-24 Paso Robles, CA.
1983 Ethnogeography of the Salinan People: A Systems Approach. Master's Thesis, California State University, Hayward.
1990 Results of Phase One Archaeological Surface Survey on Tract 1865, Paso Robles.

Girado, Amy and Rebecca Orfila
2008 Archaeological and Historical Investigations of the CAL FIRE Paso Robles Fire Station, San Luis Obispo, California. Center for Archeological Research.

Greenwood, Roberta S.
1972 9000 Years of Prehistory at Diablo Canyon, San Luis Obispo County, California. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society Occasional Paper 2, San Luis Obispo. 1978 Obispeño and Purismeño Chumash. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, California. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

Haney, Jefferson W, Terry L. Jones, and Jennifer M. Farquar 2002 Phase II Archaeological Investigation of CA-MNT-879 Fort Hunter Liggett, Monterey County, California. Report submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District.

Hester, Thomas Roy
1978 Salinan. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, California. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC.

Jones, Deborah, Terry Jones, Kacey Hadick, William Hildebrandt & Patricia Mikkelsen 2015 Archaeological Investigations for the Los Osos Wastewater Project, San Luis Obispo County, California.
-20-
Attachment 9

Page 578 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Jones, Terry L.
1993 Big Sur: A Keystone in Central California Cultural History. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 29(1):1-78.
2000 Archaeological Evaluations at CA-MNT-237 and CA-MNT-519, Fort Hunter- Liggett, Monterey County, California. Report submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District.

Jones Terry L. and Brian Codding
2019 Foragers on America’s Western Edge, The Archaeology of California’s Pecho Coast. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

Jones, Terry L., and Jefferson W. Haney
1997 Archaeological Evaluation of CA-MNT-521, Fort Hunter Liggett, Monterey County, California. Report submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District.

Jones, Terry, Nathan Stevens, Debbie Jones, Richard Fitzgerald, and Mark Hylkema. 2007 The Central Coast: A Midlatitude Milieu. In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by Terry Jones and Kathryn Klar. AltaMira Press in cooperation with the Society for California Archaeology, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

Jones, Terry L. and Georgie Waugh
1995 Central California Prehistory: A View from Little Pico Creek. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Vol. 3. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Jones, Terry, Nathan Stevens, Deborah A. Jones, Richard T. Fitzgerald and Mark Hylkema 2007 The Central Coast: A Midlatitude Milieu , in California Prehistory, Colonization, Culture and Complexity, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, pp 125-146. Altamira Press, Lanhma, MD.

King, Chester
1984 Appendix I: Ethnohistoric Background. In Archaeological Investigations on the San Antonio Terrace, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. Report on file at Central Coastal Information Center, University of California, Santa Barbara. 1990 The Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used in Social System maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region Before A.D. 1804. Garland Publishing, New York.

Krieger, Daniel E.
1988 San Luis Obispo County. Windsor Publications Inc., Northridge, California.

Kroeber, Alfred
1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Facsimile edition, California Book Company, 1953.

Lindsey, Wesley C.
1983 Soil Survey of San Luis Obispo County, California. Paso Robles Area. United States Department of Agriculture.
-21-
Attachment 9

Page 579 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Mathes, W. M.
1968 Sebastián Vizcaino and Spanish Expansion in the Pacific Ocean, 1580-1630. California Historical Society, San Francisco.

Meighan, Clement
1979 Glass Trade Beads in California. Ms. on file at Lowie Museum of Anthropology.

University of California, Berkeley.

Moratto, Michael
1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, Inc. New York.

Morrison, Annie L and John H. Haydon
1917 History of San Luis Obispo County and Environs, California. Historic Record Company, Los Angeles.

Nicholson, Loren
1980 Rails Across the Ranchos. Valley Publishers. Fresno, California.

Ohles, Wallace V.
1997 The Lands of Mission San Miguel. Lord Dancer Press, Clovis California.

Olsen, W. H., and L. A. Payen
1969 Archaeology of the Grayson Site. California Department of Parks and Recreation Archaeological Report No. 12. Sacramento.

Rabb, L. Mark, and Daniel O. Larson
1997 Medieval Climatic Anomaly and Punctuated Cultural Evolution in Coastal Southern California. American Antiquity 62: 319-336.

Rogers, David B.
1929 Prehistoric Man of the Santa Barbara Coast, California. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Special Publication 1, Santa Barbara.

Rossi, Randall Steven
1979 Land Use and Vegetation Change in the Oak Woodland-Savanna of Northern San Luis Obispo County, California (174-1978). PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Sawyer, Frank W.
1915 Paso Robles Hot Springs California. Sunset Publishing House, San Francisco.

Shumway, Burgess McK.
2007 California Ranchos, Patented Private Land Grants Listed by County. 2nd Edition, edited by Michael Burgess and Mary Wickizer Burgess. The Borgo Press.

Singer, Clay A.
2004 Cultural Resources Survey and Impact Assessment for a 40 +/- Acre Property Located on Theater Drive in the City of Paso Robles, San Luis Obispo County, California. C.A. Singer & Associates, Inc.
2006 Cultural resources survey and impact assessment for a 5 acre property on Ramada Drive near the Town of Templeton in San Luis Obispo [APN 040-151-013]. C.A. Singer & Associates, Inc.
-22-
Attachment 9

Page 580 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Stevens, Nathan, Richard T. Fitzgerald, Nancy Farrell, Mark A. Giambastiani, Jennifer M. Farquar, and Dayna Tinsley
2004 Archaeological Test Excavations at Santa Ysabel Ranch, Paso Robles, San Luis Obispo County, California. Report submitted to Weyrich Development Company, LLC.

Cultural Resource Management Services, Paso Robles.

Squibb, Paul
1984 Captain Portola in San Luis Obispo County in 1769. Tabula Rasa Press. Morro Bay, California.

Wagner, H.R.
1924 The Voyage to California of Sebastian Rodriguez Cermeño in 1595. California Historical Society Quarterly 3 (1): 3-24.
-23-
Attachment 9

Page 581 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

EXHIBIT A
Records and Literature Search
Central Coast Information Center
Museum of Natural History
Santa Barbara. CA
-24-
Attachment 9

Page 582 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
-25-
Centrnl Const lnformntion Center
Sunl:i H-,1,an, \11Lsc11111 ul''l:ilmal H1"hll)
2559 Pv.::~ta d.;:I Sol
Sim In R>rh•rn. C \?:!I 0.5
Pll<)XF. (>105) t,ill-•1711 e,t I Rl
r.\.-X (&05) 6&2-3110
EMAIL c .. idhb11am,.:-2 org
3/l2/21Jll.
:-1011.:~ hm:IJ
rulllJTlll Resource \l•naJlL·nR-nl Sen ic""
829 !'11.~u RoblQS SI. 1-'a«, Robles, C \ Q1-1.ul
lu:: Co•sl Collnlics 1'.1...-b,!1
rhc Cenoral C"o.t•I L,,fnrmsti1111 Centrer n,c:e~c,l ~""' re::t1rrl ,e.m:h ""I"""' for the pr~icct area rclerena,11 abo,-c. lo.),;ted on th¢ Tcit}!lletou LISGS 75 quad(•). The foU011 mg rdlocts the resull:i of the records . corch lur ti.: proJ,-cl tin.:l and• one qwutt.1' nul .. rutltus:

As inrlicalcd on the rbla ""I"""' form, lhc kK:atirms of n.1"•1• anrl n.'Soun:.:ii •re pnwidal in th~ following format: • cu.<tom GIS m.•p• D .hap~lc. D l=d-dr•"" m•p• D none Rcsoun.:~ "1Lhm flr~ccl Jn:l: ()
Reoow-ce< ,1 i!hm ', mile radu1c•· 0
RL1>oru w1~un nrorect an::i. 2. Sl,,00022. SL-05188
l{enoris wr!hm l , nulo nidiur. 5:SL4JJ6-II.SL-ITT3S3.SL-057S7.SL-OS~08. SL-06 1JU Ruourc• Dat3ba"'! P rintout jliSl i: D cnclo~cd D not rcq11e-dcd ■ nothing listed R .. uurc'l' J>abl,,...., Printout jd.tiul~): D L'tlc lus,--d D nut n.'qUL-..1ul • nuUung li•ll:J lttaior[!: Pi£!!~1 l!.l•abi!,~£ Htcord~: D enclosed ■ not requested 0 nothing hstcd Re[!url Dutubic,c Printout {li•t}: • ~ncl01cd 0 not n:qucstcd 0 no~1111g li,;ll.'li Re12nrl llatnho<l' l'nntnm {<lt'lail•J: D mcln,ed ■ rll'I reque<t«I 0 nnlhing li•lffl Rtt~urt Di~it:11 Dne alut).e ReL-orJi.;: D 1.:nclu.s~tl • not "·"'l""'•h,d D nud111~ fated Ke.,,nrce Rernrted OHP U.1storrc Prol!£rhr~ Dtrertorv· m~IO!!ed D not roqltes1ed ■ notl1ini: li&ted ~\rd1at!1.Jlo~kal Deter111iualio11-1' uf Eli~ihilit Y: D t:t1du,e<.I D nut n.-.1ut:,;l<:tl a 1wd1lll!/ fo,1.:d 111\: f ullo,\ mg l!UUJC1.:S or mJOnrual.aun UI~ U\ u1lablt: Ill 1111 p;//ul1 IJ· purkx.c.1,1..gm, r.r-nu:e iJ- 28065.. SutnC or these r~our::es used to 1,-., available tlrroll!•h the rHRIS hut,._~., 11,ev m,c """ onlinc; thcv can be acco«cd dir.:ctly The Office orl·li•lmic ii.-c.crv,linn m,~.,. on gu:iranl~l>< ,hnol lht: a\'•il,J,ility. cninr letcnC'<~, nr ~t>e:ur.icy nft~ infnnnJllon rro,,ded lhrnugh lhe •n~ h<t;:d belnw Attachment 9

Page 583 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
-26-
Cul!fuJ f/i<I S1,11,. LJnrJ., C'.A'll/nL»io•I SIU[••• look Du1t.J..1.1, 1<1/tJu1u 1/otu,k Bili.I/:.• /llh./ll:11).

I s I ;Ml~r,1/ .~\1rw1· 1/m,,n· I ,'1p0f{rt1pli11: A,.,,,, //,me/,,> l'lar \ lt>f'f .Y11r/,11111l P.11 I Sf'rm.., .\'alt<Jiilll Regurer uf ff,,10, 1<' Yu1,,1x,/ lb.:u.,;i,u L-aroer,utu;-,,1 ~.n.•u.:e f'/u;;q., !liommuiw11.~ Soil ::,,111~rJJ,,p.1
I.JS &n:uu ufl.:md,\ f .11UJg,.rn.-111 Gctk.rul L,or.J Offu.• O.t/Jjum1<1 Howricul L.u:d111trrL U,iing lk.:nr.l, tin· cr11Jn~1·I
F/\'e 1 ·~1,•s. An Etlmfc 1//srorlc Sfrt-Sttn\'.l' fvl' Coflfomla 11 /,IOI /nil Soll St11wr.\Japs (IY/lS/
Pt.,a~c fun,arJ d ""Pl' vf .1111 r¢>ulli11i rcpvru. fiurll tlu, prvJL"I w the ..fli~e a• soon :i,, puo.~ibl~. lluc tv lit" si:milh c n•lun: ur m.:haeolo~u.:ail ,lLc lucllliu11 wta. "" usk U1uL ,uu tlu nul in<.:luik ,_,.uurcc: l<><.:aliuu m.1ps and ~onccc loc;,tion d~;.::,riptiOll5 in yo1I1 ,q>ort if the report ~ fur pnbUc distril,ntion ff yo11 ll.1,-c a ll) 4Uc.otion, ro~JrJmg U11, re.ults pNM;nt..:l h~1t,111. pk••~ contad U,u offi.;,i at Ui<; phunc number listed abo,c.

The pTQ\ iJion of C..lifomfa Ilisloric11l R<.:tio•= buonn~lion Sysl\:111 <C'IIRlSl d~I• ,;~ this ~CJ•ml, se.irch rusponsc do~ nol in 3ny \\JY consll(ulc public duc!oslll'C oi'rD:onls olh~-n~ac .:xcmpt from di~closure node,·~ Ca ~torn ,a Public Recor~ :\ct nr any other 1.nv, 111dud111g. hen 001 Ju11i1ed 10. ~rdl; n:bt.:d 111 an:11<:ulogi""I ,it~ i11fC1nnalion moint•in.:,1 hy ,rr "" h.:h,1[ of ,rr in lhc !"''""'''""" of. Iha Si•lc nfC'alifom1.1, l)cp;lrtm.ml or P~rl« .,nfl Recre.1tit>0 Slale lli•1r.ric Pret<en.111nn Officer. c >tlico c,f I li<tonc JJ1'escrvat10n. or th<! Sule lil~toncnl Rcsou..- COllllfu~s,on. flue ~, rn=ssing dd:iy• •nd oth1,T foclnn. nnl all nflhc hi,tmical n;.nun:.: rcr orL• and'"''"""' ru:,1rd• th.11 have t-eet1 •ullmiTted In 1he c ltlice llf llt<tnrir:. Pl'e;>.eF'\'J1i<111 ~•e ;n·~11;1Me ,'i., lhi• recnrd• •earch .-l.dd~,on11l 1nfonn1atron 1\13)" t>c an1labt.: ilirou~ Ute icder.il. ~tote. t1Jld local agencies lhAt p.-1)1)1~ or l"'id l'rrr lmloric.11 ,...nurcc: mu»ec:m<:nl work in lhe ,c::m:h on:a. \cWilinna.11)'. N.:alivi: ,\mc::ri:.,.n lnnc:« h~ve hi<tnnilJI reY'lll\)CI inform:>1inn nnf in lhe emus lnv-.ntnry and y,1u ~hnuln QOOI~ the (';ijjfnmia )blmo,\.mc, i= H.cril.1!!0 ~01wni""'-110 for infoanntivo oo Wb<>@looGI lrib:tl couJnct..

Shnuld you r•11uin, an) 11ddi1,nnal infnnn•linn fnr lhe ""°"" referenced rrctie<L reference lhe n,c,,rd sear.:l, ,wmhei li,tc<l ahin,e " '""' making inqui, i1.."<. R..Tuot, made oft.er initial ur.uicin~ will ,.._,ull in lbc J11'C1l31"3li<m of a M.-p.1r.,lc im·oicc.

Than!; )~1u for us,ng the C'HRlS.

Sincerely
llrbn R.,rhier
Col>C(liw,tor
Attachment 9

Page 584 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

EXHIBIT B
Letter to NAHC
Response From NAHC
Letter To Native Americans and Groups
Response From Native Americans and Groups
-27-
Attachment 9

Page 585 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Cultural Resource Management Services
829 Paso Robles Street
Paso Robles, CA 93446
Phone 805-237-3838
March 16, 2022
Mr. Steven Quinn
Associate Governmental Program Analyst
California Native American Heritage Commission
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100
West Sacramento, CA 95691
RE: Phase I Inventory Survey, Commercial Building
2805 Theatre Drive, Paso Robles, CA, APN: 009-851-022
Dear Mr. Quinn:

The owners of the property described above intends to construct a new commercial building on the identified parcel.

Cultural Resource Management Services (CRMS) has been retained, to prepare a Phase I surface survey as well as provide an early participation notice to interested Native Americans and Native American groups relative to the proposed construction project.

Please review the sacred lands files for any Native American Sacred resources or sites that may be within or adjacent to the area of potential effect (APE). Please verify that any sacred sites in the vicinity are not in the APE. The project area is within the corporate limits of the city of Paso Robles, San Luis Obispo county, and is identified on the attached portion of the USGS Templeton 7.5' Quadrangle. The study area falls within,, Township 27 South and Range 12 East MDM. The project location is depicted as a salmon colored polygon. As the area was part of a Rancho, there are no section lines. -28-
Attachment 9

Page 586 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Page Two
March 16, 2022
Steven Quinn
Also provide a list, including names and addresses, of Native American individuals and organizations who may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area; or who may have a concern or wish to comment on the project.

If you have any questions contact me at the phone number or address shown, or by email [email protected]. We look forward to your reply.

Best regards,
Ron Rose
Vice President
Encl: Portion of USGS 7.5' Quadrangle , Templeton, CA

-29-
Attachment 9

Page 587 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Portion of USGS 7.5' Quadrangle, Templeton, CA
-30-
Attachment 9

Page 588 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
-31-
' . • ,.,.u11,i,,,., ,,. '
c.; :I
. ._,,,. .. ~
,,,....,,. . .,, "'""'
-
NAtlC H.IADQIAfflll
l>ll,l•~ w, ... t, .! ._., I U
Wl,..t t,,,i -.,,mno
t ul1 ,..,,ai;1
rvi,-, "'"'" ,, o•s:fo1c IUlltY
Hitikit"°"'".,.

Ut lf At Ct !G»NI&

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
Alli" 2l 2022
Runikr'.AJ
Cuill,(Qj lt10<.0'et ~-•I s«vl:tl
"10 (IT\Ol 10. (9!1?,'lf 9i'Dt ;aa,
Re, ri..w I """7 Camm,....l luldong 280.I l>oabu Drive Pa,o l ubi.. CA Pmi<rd San lun Otlifl)O Co,.,nty
Dear l.o ~o .. ·
ArtcCl'd MCten 01 IM Nat .-. ~m111ccrHllllogt Cemm .~ il Al'C J SCCl'l<I LOndl Flot ISLIJ 'AO\ t 0"'1f~li.1 Jfl JrW)--ilfllYW)tOl l'l)lj hrrwt '11)1:'t?u'l,..,.f lfl ltw. ,n.,w.1 r,i r,1t:lf'W').lf11 1·0j,'rt I '""''" ...,,. ~ Ho""8"3f II"' OD<MOO Ol ,poGi&:. llJG ,n100,,a1,on ,n IM Stf clo8o not ""1,cole Iha ob•= cl cull-,o• re,o,,c,,. I, <ml' cro,ed owo. Olher 101Tce1 ol rot..ol ,_,.... •-o,o 1>w c.onl<>C.W la r,k,n,c,t,on1~ lnown a>d 1"""'"16'1"1.,.

At!o:.ho.J 8 0 !hi ul Nulm'IA~1tlf'le.u\ llin 'H'lC>trto(Ol!I.O llO'tO -~ OI Clft.1u1m11.)t.ff".ih In lt,.~telcrto. lnilbl 1110\10d~o 1•cr,1n9p1cKe w,10c01ngort01ol pc,11111101 <JdveiY' l,moci ,,;ii-., IIY.' propo,ed P'olecl '""° I '"ll'T-'I YoUc:ooiocl ol ollh<,,e rd:o'r.<1; I th61 OOMCI wpQI'/ Wll<lffl\OllOn I~ 11\lgnl (<!C01'11111,,M CIPl«I ~•'II ll)!!Clie I~ av co• <Jt1ngo411,,,.., Ille(! • .....,'"""'°'""'_. l""bell'I ot,il, to1e,p,ro 10 '""11 o! "''"' lo L~IA MU lhuoµp-Of,utdhllu •u~'k!Jhu,nut lJuut1tete.:•w.dWllllw1IYAJIMJIOl,ul noll!lco1ion Int Commhllon 1eq11tdt lhol ~ fol..-p..th o lelt!,ho,t col o, t mallo f:'IM.re ~ Jh,., J-•nt- I("! ...,IYmofM hot bf' >n rer.e1w,dll YoU .,,,._ onlllcnlm ol ""1...,.. ol ,vklrn,--p"°"" """""' mn k i.. ,-..,,,, me. Wlfh 'fOll Cl.bd.lonc-a, Wtl con o.wse that O\.f 11,b r.onlain c1.171lfl• ntama1t00. fl fflJ tirh'fJll!l"f ,_,1i1 lk""' '' 1"'1(1 oitd •••JJI lilc11,n.1llt'1f\ ,_..,... c t1ok• I tMut '"" po1111 «stttu: C@ CO"'P9il?•"'n<ms:'¥2x
e,7 ea,"l"r
Cody C<mwllt1e
r..,tf\nrl l ~.n.,., .. ,.., Am~t
Allodl,,_I
Po;t I ct I
Attachment 9

Page 589 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Cultural Resource Management
Service
829 Paso Robles Street
Paso Robles, CA 93446
Phone 805-237-3838
Fax 805-237-3849
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX April 25, 2022

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
RE: Phase I Archaeological Inventory Survey, APN: 009-851-022 2805 Theatre Drive, Paso Robles, CA
XXXXXXXXXXX:

The owners of the property described above intend to construct a new commercial building on the property described above.

The project area is within the corporate limits of the city of Paso Robles, San Luis Obispo county, and is identified on the attached portion of the USGS Templeton 7.5' Quadrangle. The study area falls within,, Township 27 South and Range 12 East MDM. The project location is depicted as a salmon colored polygon. As the area was part of a Rancho, there are no section lines.

The Native American Heritage Commission has indicated that no Sacred Sites exist either on the property or in the near vicinity. If you have knowledge of the area, please share that information with me in your comments. If you have any questions contact me at the phone number or address shown, or by email [email protected]. We look forward to your reply.

Best regards,
Ron Rose
Vice President
Encl: Portion of USGS 7.5' Quadrangle, Templeton, CA
-32-
Attachment 9

Page 590 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
The letter on the previous page was sent to the following individuals and groups. XXXX substituted for address and salutation.
-33-
Dllrbamnol V,nu,n,no S.nd c,t
MisSA>n /1..-/1.Jt>s
tfn.,.1'11,1 Gw.n-llfl
51> N Ann Saeet. • B
Vern..-• CA. 9l001
F'norn, (209) 601 467a
~etlJdlr~w.nw,,r;.~ty,,u .wo1
Barb11rcnol Veowrc,no B.tnd c,t
M,uion Jndwu1$
AnMU& Ayala

18.8 S S..ru> R<l6a Slreel
Ventllr~ CA 93001
Pho'1r. (1105) S 1 S • 91).!.4 Amll!IUMyal!t 71l@>yAh0o a,m Barbarenal V,nrun,no S.•nd c,t
/lfiss/tv, l1>dl.>ns
~'ldlJ -..II. f \.llllcl~lcf I
9!;2 El CBIT'IOO COltO
~ CA 93023
n,- (l!0S) 216 12Sl
8arbff,•no/Vcnt1J1c1N Bund ol
Mi&.•iorr lndllfn11
Ju l<e Tuma om!\· SteM!le
cro,pe,son
36-5 Norlh Pc• -\ve
Oj.aJ CA !0023
F'no- e· (805) 046 &2U
µumamaot""h«n,a I rom
(.;f11111N>l1 C.:OU,.,;i/ of
Bakanl111/d
Jul., Qua r Cnalll)eN>n
72 q T el<&S S11..-,1
t!J~_,,,i,:1(1 CA, ~JSOI
P111ir11,: {661) 322 -0121
chumashlnbe(;l>stx:qlobal.net
Norlhtlrn Cltumt1sh Tn/JJII
Coun,;j/
Vlooel Wallo.el Cha!!pe!>OO
PO ~ a533
Lill O!!<l.,, CA. ;J,11,
F'none (760) 549 JSH
vl0ic1s.:igeW1>1le1""gma,1 Cllm
N~11ve l\men,;,,n He,rnage Commt$Sl<>n
Native AmenCiJ•l Contact l.Jst
ChlJmnh
ci-.,ma,;n
Cfwma!/1
San Luis Obispo Counly
41,4/,0'"'
Sltlman Tnbe of Monte.ray, san
Luis 00/spo Co,11>1ks
l'1o1u, Ourtu,1, 1,,w, Mrr1,~,..i1,:,,
7070 Morro Road Su,18 A
11,,,.ciulerc CA 93U2
Phonr.· (80~} 4&4 · 2650
,,,1u~...-1ltfldlltJIUl: u,m
Son 1.tns Obispo Coutr1y
C/1Ut1111sh Council
1030 R11Ch1io Ro!ld
G•o,,er Bea<;ti. Cl\ 934 JJ
s,,,g,, Y11,u llaf,J ul C.11U1Jlil>,/1
lndian5
Kenneth Ka'1n, Ctwrper,cn
P OBo,,17
~11!.J y,.,L CA, i.J~oU
Pmne (805) 688 . 7S97
rax· (90S) 686-951B
kk.im'"'"-"'"'yr,:-tthJn\.1sh o,g
Tu/e Rf'le, lnd!an Tnbe
Sa8n.on
en,,,..,.i,
Cl·oO\J!.h
Jney Garfelr1 Tnbilt Archaeoln<J s,
P.0.&A.: ts9 Yu~Ul
PDrlBMllo CA !>32~8
Chumo"1
F'hM6 (559) 783 · 8892
Fa• (S59) 783 8932 ,._.,Y -ll"' ,.,1r.1 ,.,,.,"" r,,,ru ,i,.,- run qov
T utc Rwe, /11dion T11be
KemVlfl'8 t:.,f'l 1ut1n1."f-.WJ
Dej>a!UTl!I nl
P O B<>• 569 YokUI
C"41 "'""' Ptine<v,lle. CA qnsa
l'h<.11"' (>>~J l~S · ijl!\12
fax: (559) 783-8932
k&m V9111•"'wlenVenril>o-Mn QOV
T11H! RM"J In/Mn Tn/'w!
Neil Peyron, Ciairp,,r-.on
F' 0 Bo• Sl!'l VolitUI.

Chumosn 1'01\ervdle. Cl\ ~1258
P1100e: (559) 781 • U71
r a, · (SS9J 781-~s10
ne~ pPyrcn• ,1u1<;m.ennt,e-n,;n gov
N:I ... Clll'S1..., 11 Ill A-(J in,o,o.,,.,a. ~~ ctr'ttl■ -llltt .WW J'!t='fl t,t1,liAa")'"'"P'ftC•~U~ ft~ ,W,; ). llettea1 •U~ Cu1e. ~ 1 5091..ff llbel"I..Mi~~--sa..a.1.1C"179olh.!:~ n-uoe.O.... ,..
1111.~.,
.. _. .. ~
... ,
lhi.111,.,n,...,
......... l""''''
P..v!A,J"'.-. ~....-•,l'C.r.A
1l .... flwrJ • 6{!'N.....W• "-r1hr.ntae,r .. •l\.•.-t
On-, .. ~~~"ll .. P,•~P!°.OOIS....,. ~
~0>-2022.·
002195
lo/2
Attachment 9

Page 591 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
-34-
Native Amencan I ksitage COffTil1HJOn
NatNe American Cont.ac'l List
X,,lon-Salln.,n Trib<,
Donna Haro. Tnbal HeacJwoman
P. o. eo. 704S S<ll,n-,n
Sp1e,:ke1>, CA. ~3962
Plllll•>: (~2S) 470 · S019
(IJUOI01iaak.Jetse(wgll(JII.COfll
l/t>Jon-Sa/inan Trib,,
KDren WIiie. Charper50n
P. 0. Bo• 704S S'1lr1t1n
Spreekels. CA 9~2
PllOI"': (831) 23$ - 1488
xoio,,.ai,nan.llentage@g,na,1,cvrn
yak tity,1 riryu y.:,k tilhini -
NMth,Jm C'hlNnash TriblJ
Mona Tucker, Chairperson
G60 Cam,no Doi Rey Chumash
/lncyo Grande CA, 93420
l'l'IOne· (805) H8 2121
Oltva.s ~mail com
San Lurs Obispo County
4/24/2022
~IQ._ ___ ,_...,. ... (lll~O:lil.?t,llt"'4.iwllill._a....t.dtQ,Ulli15WOi-.Di r~•'r'iliil'S...~CA~~-!:W•-,dal5actlf'IIO!iO..Jtl .,,_,i--...t~,t..-pbDi'! ,.,.._. f#l1Q.•nl •P'l.ttie~u.i~'la"A1i0ifl1ib!Pl&~ffi'"'i('a► llHIIC Qi_,..,~ Kll«dKW'qk,..til N'ftf•,.,,_.._. ~ ~lg, nAstlhtWl"n •1"1Wll,<'ll ka 11'1 fl!"~ 11.-.. I $1,1r,-,, C'~(,111 Pblilf11J280fi: l l..:w9D:,,... P.'K(I~ C:APh .,.:;l~li~OJliPi!O:.ufJ PROJ·20l2·
001195
Q,1/24/2022 01:"6 PM lot 2
Attachment 9

Page 592 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

RESPONSE TO LETTER WRITTEN
April 2, 2022 response from Julie Tumamait-Stenslie
Ron
I will defer any comments to Mona Tucker
Thanks
Julie
-35-
Attachment 9

Page 593 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Attachment 9

Page 594 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center
Paso Robles, California
BAC Job # 2022-088
Prepared For:

City of Paso Robles
Prepared By:

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc.

Dario Gotchet, Principal Consultant
September 15, 2022
Attn: Katie Banister
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA 93446
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. ● P.O. Box 7968, Auburn, CA. 95604 ● Phone: (530) 537-2328 ● bacnoise.com

BOLLARD
Acoustical Consultants
Attachment 9

Page 595 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 1 ends

Introduction
The proposed Peterbilt Service and Sales Center (project) is located at 2805 Theatre Drive in Paso Robles, California (APN: 009-851-022). The project proposes the development of a service center for semi-trucks, a retail parts department, and a dealership. The site amenities would include offices for employees, a lounge area for customers, an outdoor display area, and customer parking. The project area with aerial imagery is shown in Figure 1. The project site plan is presented in Figure 2.

Due to the proximity of the proposed project to existing residential uses, Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC) was retained by the City of Paso Robles to prepare an assessment of potential noise impacts associated with the project. Specifically, the purposes of this assessment are to quantify noise levels associated with proposed on-site operations, to assess state of compliance of those noise levels with applicable City of Paso Robles noise standards, and if necessary, to recommend measures to reduce noise levels to acceptable limits at the nearest existing residential uses.

Noise Fundamentals and Terminology
Noise is often described as unwanted sound. Sound is defined as any pressure variation in air that the human ear can detect. If the pressure variations occur frequently enough (at least 20 times per second), they can be heard, and thus are called sound. Measuring sound directly in terms of pressure would require a very large and awkward range of numbers. To avoid this, the decibel scale was devised. The decibel scale allows a million-fold increase in pressure to be expressed as 120 dB. Another useful aspect of the decibel scale is that changes in levels (dB) correspond closely to human perception of relative loudness. Appendix A contains definitions of Acoustical Terminology. Figure 3 shows common noise levels associated with various sources.

The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent upon many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the usual range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable, and can be approximated by weighing the frequency response of a sound level meter by means of the standardized A-weighing network.

There is a strong correlation between A-weighted sound levels (expressed as dBA) and community response to noise. All noise levels reported in this section are in terms of A-weighted levels in decibels.

Community noise is commonly described in terms of the “ambient” noise level, which is defined as the all-encompassing noise level associated with a given noise environment. A common statistical tool to measure the ambient noise level is the average, or equivalent, sound level (Leq) over a given time period (usually one hour). The Leq is the foundation of the Day-Night Average Level noise descriptor (DNL or Ldn), and shows very good correlation with community response to noise.

Attachment 9

Page 596 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Legend
Figure 1
Peterbilt Service & Sales Center
Paso Robles, California
Project Area
Project Border (Approximate)
Residential Parcel Boundaries
0 75 150
Scale (Feet)
Residential
(Mobile Home Park)
Nutwood Cir
RV
Storage
Long-Term Ambient Noise Survey Location
040-133-024 040-133-022 040-133-020
N
A
Attachment 9

Page 597 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Legend
CNG Vehicle Repair Station (Covered Outdoor Bay)
Peterbilt Service & Sales Center
Paso Robles, California
Project Site Plan
0 50 100 Figure 2
Scale (Feet)
Primary On-Site Truck Circulation
Service Department (Within Building)
Building
RV
Storage
040-133-024 040-133-022 040-133-020
J-·-------- ---·--- 1
( ---" l
0 N
A
Attachment 9

Page 598 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 4 ends

Figure 3
Common Noise Levels Associated with Various Sources
The Day-Night Average Level (DNL or Ldn) is based upon the average noise level over a 24-hour day, with a +10-decibel weighting applied to noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours. The nighttime penalty is based upon the assumption that people react to nighttime noise exposures as though they were twice as loud as daytime exposures. Because DNL represents a 24-hour average, it tends to disguise short-term variations in the noise environment.

DNL-based noise standards are commonly used to assess noise impacts associated with traffic, railroad, and aircraft noise sources.
12-Gauge Shotgun 160
Chainsaw 110
Motorcycle 100
Lawn Mower 90
Vacuum Cleaner 80
ii Conversation 65
floor FM !>O
I
Rustling Leaves 30
Pin Falling 15
Decibel Scale (dBA)*
►
◄ --t ..
◄ di
► : ✓ : ◄ ....

Hammer Drill 114
--==- ◄
►
City Traffic 78
Electrical Transformer 45
'Sources:
www.cdc.gt:11/nlosMOl)ics/noise/nolsemeter.html
httl)://e-a-r.com/hearingoonservalion/laq_main.cfm
Attachment 9

Page 599 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 5 ends

Existing Ambient Noise Environment in the Project Vicinity The existing ambient noise environment in the immediate project vicinity is defined primarily by traffic on U.S. Highway 101 and Theatre Avenue, and to a lesser extent by nearby commercial operations. To generally quantify the existing ambient noise environment in the immediate project vicinity, BAC conducted long-term (24-hour) noise level measurements on the project site from Monday, June 6, 2022, to Tuesday, June 7, 2022. The noise survey location, identified on Figure 1, was selected to be generally representative of the ambient noise level environment at the nearest residential uses located immediately south of the project site. Photographs of the noise level survey location are provided in Appendix B.

A Larson-Davis Laboratories (LDL) Model LxT precision integrating sound level meter was used to complete the ambient noise level survey. The meter was calibrated immediately before and after use with an LDL Model CAL200 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accuracy off the measurements. The equipment used meets all pertinent specifications of the American National Standards Institute for Type 1 sound level meters (ANSI S1.4). The results of the long-term ambient noise survey are shown numerically and graphically in Appendices C and D (respectively) and are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
Summary of Long-Term Ambient Noise Measurement Results1 Site Description2 Date
DNL
(dB)
Average Measured Hourly Noise Levels (dB)
Daytime3 Evening4 Nighttime5
Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax
South end of project parcel
near residential uses 6/6/22 – 6/7/22 59 54 64 53 64 52 62 1 Detailed summaries of the noise monitoring results are provided in Appendices C and D. 2 Long-term ambient noise monitoring location is identified on Figure 1. 3 Daytime: 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
4 Evening: 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
5 Nighttime: 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. 2022.

Criteria for Acceptable Noise Exposure
City of Paso Robles Municipal Code
Section 21.60.060 of the City of Paso Robles Municipal Code establishes exterior and interior noise standards that would be applicable to project on-site operations. That code section has been reproduced below.

21.60.060 – Exterior and interior noise standards:

A. The noise standards contained in Table 2 (below), unless otherwise specifically indicated in this chapter, shall apply to all noise-sensitive exterior and interior areas within Paso Robles.

Attachment 9

Page 600 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 6 ends

B. It is unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noise which causes the noise levels on an affected property, when measured in the designated sensitive exterior or interior location, to exceed the noise standards specified below in Table 2.

Table 2
Exterior Noise Standards for Locally Regulated (Non-Transportation) Noise Sources Receiving Land Use Period3
Exterior Areas1Interior Spaces2
Leq
4 Lmax5 Leq4 Lmax5
Residential
Day
Evening
Night
55 50
45 75
70 65
45 40
35 60
55 45
Mixed Use Residential
Day
Evening
Night
---
---
---
---
---
---
45 40
35 60
55 45
Transient Lodging Hospitals6 & Nursing
Homes
Day
Evening
Night
60 55
50 75
75 70
45 40
35 60
55 45
Uptown Town Center S.P. Area
(UTCSP) Residential
Day
Evening
Night
60 55
50 80
75 70
45 40
35 60
55 45
Theaters & Auditoriums
Day
Evening
Night
55 50
---
75 70
---
35 35
35 40
40 40
Churches, Meeting Halls, Libraries Day
Evening
55 50
75 70
45 40
55 55
Schools7 Day
Evening
---
---
---
---
40 40
55 55
Office/Professional Day
Evening
60 55
80 75
45 45
60 60
Commercial/Retail Buildings Day
Evening
60 55
80 75
50 50
60 60
Playgrounds, Parks, etc. Day
Evening
55 55
75 75
---
---
---
---
Industrial Day
Evening
60 55
80 75
50 50
60 60
Specific Notes:

1. Noise sensitive areas are defined acoustic terminology section.

2. Interior noise level standards are applied within noise-sensitive areas of the various land uses, as defined in the acoustic terminology section, with windows and doors closed.

3. Daytime hours = 7 am – 7 pm, Evening hours = 7 pm – 10 pm, Nighttime hours = 10 pm – 7 am.

4. Leq = Average or “Equivalent” noise level during the worst-case hour in which the building is in use.

5. Lmax = Highest measured sound level occurring during a given interval of time (Typically 1 hour).

6. Hospitals are often noise-generating uses. The exterior noise level standards for hospitals are applicable only at clearly identified areas designated for outdoor relaxation by either hospital staff or patients.

7. Exterior areas of school uses are not typically noise-sensitive. As a result, the standards for schools are focused on the interior office and classroom spaces.

General Notes Applicable to All Noise Standards and Land Uses:
a. Where the noise source in question consists of speech or music, or is impulsive in nature, or contains a pure tone, the noise standards of this table are reduced by 5 dB.
b. Where ambient noise levels exceed the noise level standards shown above, the noise standards shall be increased in 5 dB increments to encompass the ambient.
c. Reductions in the noise standards for noise sources identified in general note “A” above shall be applied after any increases warranted by elevated ambient conditions prescribed in general note “B”, subject to verification through a noise study.

Source: City of Paso Robles Municipal Code, Section 21.60.060.

Attachment 9

Page 601 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 7 ends

Noise Level Criteria Applied to the Project
The nearest noise-sensitive receptors to the project site have been identified as residences to the south within the Los Robles Mobile Home Estates. These residential uses are shown on Figure

1. Based on the proposed uses of the project (i.e., commercial services and sales), it is reasonably assumed that hours of operation for the business would be limited to daytime and evening hours only. Based on the information above, the City’s exterior and interior daytime and evening noise level limits for residential uses shown in Table 2 would be applicable to the project.

However, pursuant to the footnote “b” contained in Table 2, where ambient noise levels exceed the exterior noise level standards shown in Table 2, the exterior noise standards shall be increased in 5 dB increments to encompass the ambient.

Based on the results from the BAC ambient noise level survey at the nearest residential uses to the south (Table 1), and pursuant to the adjustment criteria contained in Table 2, the following exterior noise level limits shown in Table 3 were applied to project on-site operations and assessed at the nearest residential uses to the south of the project. Satisfaction of the City’s noise level standards at the closest residential uses would ensure compliance with the City’s noise level limits at residential uses located farther away.

Table 3
Municipal Code Exterior Noise Level Standards Applied to the Project Average Measured Hourly
Noise Levels (dB)1
Unadjusted Noise
Standards (dB)2
Ambient Exceed
Standards?3
City Standards Applied to
Project (dB)4
Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax 54 64 53 64 55 75 50 70 No No Yes No 55 75 55 70
1 Average measured hourly noise levels at the nearest residential uses to south (Table 1). 2 Unadjusted City of Paso Robles Municipal Code exterior noise level limits for residential uses (Table 2). 3 Determination based on a comparison of measured ambient noise level data and the City’s noise standards. 4 Adjusted noise standards in red pursuant to footnote b of Table 2.

Source: City of Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.60.060 and BAC.

The exterior noise level limits shown in Table 3 were applied at the outdoor areas (i.e., backyards) of the nearest residential uses to the south. Additionally, the City’s (unadjusted) interior noise level limits for residential uses presented in Table 2 were also applied to the project.

Evaluation of Project-Generated Operations Noise
As mentioned previously, the project proposes the development of a service center for semitrucks, a retail parts department, and a dealership. The site amenities would include offices for employees, a lounge area for customers, an outdoor display area, and customer parking.

The most significant noise sources associated with normal project operations will likely consist of air compressors and pneumatic tools associated with the service department (within the building), and on-site truck circulation. In addition, activities occurring within a covered outdoor Attachment 9

Page 602 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 8 ends

maintenance area for compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles have also been identified as a primary noise source. The locations of the on-site truck circulation route, service department and CNG maintenance area are shown on Figure 2. Analyses of noise exposure associated with the above-identified on-site activities at the nearest residential uses to the south are presented in the following section.

On-Site Truck Circulation Noise
It is expected that most of the on-site truck circulation will be associated with the service department. The project site plan indicates that the trucks will enter and exit the property via one access point on Theatre Drive. Once on the project property, the trucks will head west towards the service department near the rear of the building. The location of the on-site circulation route, which include truck turnaround areas indicated in the site plan, is illustrated on Figure 2.

Heavy truck arrivals and departures, and on-site truck circulation, will occur at low speeds. To quantify the noise generation of slow moving trucks, BAC utilized single-event passby noise test results for slow-moving heavy trucks conducted at the West El Camino truck stop in Sacramento, California. The passby measurements were conducted at a reference distance of 50 feet at a location suitable for isolation of individual passby events. According to BAC file data, single-event heavy truck passby noise levels are approximately 74 dB Lmax and 83 dB SEL at a reference distance of 50 feet.

Because the City of Paso Robles Municipal Code noise standards are provided in terms of both hourly average (Leq) noise levels and individual maximum (Lmax) noise levels, it is necessary to identify the number of truck movements occurring during a typical busy hour of operations to assess compliance with the Leq-based standards. Based on the project site plan, the truck service department has approximately 10 bays (8 work bench areas, 2 having double bay capacity).

Conservatively assuming that all 10 truck bays could both fill and empty during a worst-case busy hour, the project would generate 20 truck passbys during that hour. Based on a conservative estimate of 20 truck passbys during a given worst-case hour and an SEL of 83 per passby, the hourly average noise level generated by heavy truck passbys computes to 60 dB Leq at a reference distance of 50 feet during a worst-case busy hour of service operations.

Based on the assumptions and equation provided above, and assuming standard sound wave spreading loss (-6 dB per doubling of distance), worst-case on-site truck circulation noise exposure at the nearest residential uses to the south was calculated and the results of those calculations are presented in Table 4.

Attachment 9

Page 603 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 9 ends

Table 4
Predicted Worst-Case On-Site Truck Circulation Noise Levels at Nearest Residential Uses Residential APN1 Distance (ft)2
Predicted Noise Levels (dB)
Leq Lmax
040-133-020 200 51 62
040-133-022 215 51 61
040-133-024 280 49 59
Applied Daytime Noise Standards (dB)3 55 75
Applied Evening Noise Standards (dB)3 55 70
1 Residential parcels are shown on Figures 1 and 2.
2 Distances scaled from nearest on-site truck circulation to backyard of residences using the provided site plan. 3 Applied noise standards based on BAC noise survey and City adjustment criteria.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. 2022.

As indicated in Table 4, worst-case project on-site truck circulation noise level exposure is predicted to satisfy the applied City of Paso Robles Municipal Code exterior daytime and evening noise level limits at the nearest residential uses. In addition, standard residential construction (e.g., stucco siding, STC-27 windows, door weather-stripping, exterior wall insulation, composition plywood roof), typically results in an exterior to interior noise reduction of approximately 25 dB with windows and doors closed. Given this exterior-to-interior noise reduction typically achieved from standard residential construction, and based on the predicted exterior noise levels in Table 4, project on-site truck circulation noise level exposure is expected to be well below the Municipal Code interior daytime and evening noise level standards within the interior areas of the nearest residences.

Based on the analysis provided above, project on-site truck circulation noise level exposure is expected to satisfy the applied City of Paso Robles Municipal Code exterior and interior noise level criteria provided the following specific measure is implemented by the project:

1. All on-site truck circulation should be limited to daytime and/or evening hours only (i.e., no operations during nighttime hours).

Service Department Equipment Noise
The project site plans indicate the truck service/repair department will be located within the west end of the proposed building. The site plans further indicate that the service portion of the building will have a total of 10 bay doors, distributed evenly between the north and south sides of the building. The proposed building and service department are shown in Figure 2.

To quantify noise levels associated with service department equipment, BAC utilized file data collected for an automobile repair facility (Red Rocket Automotive Repair Facility in Sacramento, California – 2013). Specific noise sources quantified in the noise level data included an air compressor, air hammer, impact wrench, hydraulic lift, and an oil pump. The results of the reference noise level measurements are contained below in Table 5.

Attachment 9

Page 604 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 10 ends

Table 5
Reference Noise Levels Collected at the Red Rocket Repair Facility in Sacramento, CA (2013) Equipment
Measurement
Distance (ft)
Leq While in
Use (dB)
Minutes Per
Hour Used
(est.)1
Computed
Hourly Leq
(dB)
Measured
Lmax (dB)
Compressor 30 73 15 67 75
Air hammer 30 92 5 81 95
Impact wrench 30 75 10 67 82
Hydraulic lift 30 81 10 73 84
Oil pump 15 70 10 62 71
1 The number of minutes in any given hour each noise source would be in operation was estimated from previous BAC observations at automobile repair facilities, as noise-producing equipment is not in constant use.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. 2013.

Based on the reference noise measurements for the equipment in Table 5, and assuming standard sound wave spreading loss (-6 dB per doubling of distance), equipment noise exposure at the nearest residential uses to the south was calculated and the results of those calculations are presented below in Tables 6 and 7. The data shown in Table 6 reflect predicted equipment noise levels at the nearest residential uses to the south with service department bay doors on the south and west sides of the building in the open position. Predicted equipment noise levels presented in Table 7 include consideration of the sound transmission loss that would be provided by the bay doors on the south and west sides of the building in the closed position during operations and have been adjusted by -15 dB.

According to the provided site plans, the air compressor for the service department is proposed to be located above the covered outdoor CNG vehicle maintenance area on the west side of the building (i.e., equipment will not be located within the building). As a result, no adjustment for service department bay door or building facade transmission loss was applied to air compressor noise level exposure at the nearest residential uses in Table 7.

Attachment 9

Page 605 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 11 ends

Table 6
Predicted Service Department Equipment Noise Levels at Nearest Residential Uses – Bay Doors Open Residential APN1 Distance (ft)2
Predicted Equipment Noise Levels (dB)
Compressor3 Air Hammer Impact Wrench Hydraulic Lift Oil Pump Combined3 Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax
040-133-020 280 48 56 62 76 48 63 54 65 37 46 63 76
040-133-022 330 46 54 60 74 46 61 52 63 35 44 61 74
040-133-024 415 44 52 58 72 44 59 50 61 33 42 59 72
Applied Daytime Noise Standards (dB)4 55 75
Applied Evening Noise Standards (dB)4 55 70
1 Residential parcels are shown on Figures 1 and 2.
2 Distances scaled from the nearest work area within service department to backyard of residences using the provided site plan. 3 Calculated combined Leq and highest predicted Lmax noise levels from all equipment. 4 Applied noise standards based on BAC noise survey and City adjustment criteria.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. 2022.

Table 7
Predicted Service Department Equipment Noise Levels at Nearest Residential Uses – Bay Doors Closed Residential APN1 Distance (ft)2
Predicted Equipment Noise Levels (dB)3
Compressor Air Hammer Impact Wrench Hydraulic Lift Oil Pump Combined4 Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax
040-133-020 280 48 56 47 61 33 48 39 50 22 31 51 61
040-133-022 330 46 54 45 59 31 46 37 48 20 29 49 59
040-133-024 415 44 52 43 57 29 44 35 46 <20 27 47 57
Applied Daytime Noise Standards (dB)5 55 75
Applied Evening Noise Standards (dB)5 55 70
1 Residential parcels are shown on Figures 1 and 2.
2 Distances scaled from the nearest work area within service department to backyard of residences using the provided site plan. 3 Predicted equipment noise levels with consideration of bay doors on south and west sides of service department in the closed position during equipment operations. No sound transmission loss adjustment for bay doors/building facade applied to predicted air compressor noise levels. 4 Calculated combined Leq and highest predicted Lmax noise levels from all equipment. 5 Applied noise standards based on BAC noise survey and City adjustment criteria.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. 2022.

Attachment 9

Page 606 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 12 ends

As indicated in Table 6, noise levels associated with air hammer equipment operations with bay doors in the open position could exceed the applied City of Paso Robles Municipal Code exterior daytime and evening noise level limits at the nearest residential uses. Noise from all other sources is predicted to be satisfactory with the City standards. With service department bay doors in the closed position, all equipment noise levels are predicted to satisfy the applied Municipal Code exterior daytime and evening noise level limits at the nearest residential uses to the south.

Additionally, given the exterior to interior noise reduction typically achieved from standard residential construction (approximately 25 dB with windows and doors closed), service department equipment noise level exposure is expected to satisfy the Municipal Code interior daytime and evening noise level standards within the interior areas of the nearest residences – both with building bay doors in the open and closed positions.

Based on the analysis provided above, project service department equipment noise level exposure is expected to satisfy the applied City of Paso Robles Municipal Code exterior and interior noise level criteria provided the following specific measures are implemented by the project:

1. All service department operations should be limited to daytime and/or evening hours only (i.e., no operations during nighttime hours).

2. Operations within the service department area of the building should occur with south and west side bay doors in the closed position while air hammer usage is occurring.

Additionally, service technicians and management should be aware of equipment use during the brief periods in which air hammer usage is occurring to reduce to the potential for an exceedance of the applied Municipal Code noise level criteria at the closest residential uses.

CNG Vehicle Maintenance Area Equipment Noise
An analysis of service department equipment noise level exposure was presented in the previous section. Based on the reference noise measurements in Table 5, and assuming standard sound wave spreading loss (-6 dB per doubling of distance), CNG vehicle maintenance area equipment noise exposure at the nearest residential uses to the south was calculated and the results of those calculations are presented in Table 8. It should be noted that not all of the equipment identified in Table 5 was utilized in the analysis of CNG vehicle maintenance area noise exposure. Rather, this analysis focuses on assumed equipment usage within the outdoor CNG vehicle maintenance area.

Attachment 9

Page 607 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 13 ends

Table 8
Predicted CNG Vehicle Maintenance Area Equipment Noise Levels at Nearest Residential Uses Residential
APN1 Distance (ft)2
Predicted Equipment Noise Levels (dB)
Compressor Impact Wrench Oil Pump Combined3
Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax
040-133-020 260 48 56 48 63 37 46 51 63
040-133-022 300 47 55 47 62 36 45 50 62
040-133-024 385 45 53 45 60 34 43 48 60
Applied Daytime Noise Standards (dB)4 55 75
Applied Evening Noise Standards (dB)4 55 70
1 Residential parcels are shown on Figures 1 and 2.
2 Distances scaled from CNG vehicle maintenance area to backyard of residences using the provided site plan. 3 Calculated combined Leq and highest predicted Lmax noise levels from all equipment. 4 Applied noise standards based on BAC noise survey and City adjustment criteria.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. 2022.

The Table 8 data indicate noise levels associated with outdoor CNG vehicle maintenance area equipment are predicted to satisfy the applied City of Paso Robles Municipal Code exterior daytime and evening noise level limits at the nearest residential uses. In addition, given the exterior to interior noise reduction typically achieved from standard residential construction (approximately 25 dB with windows and doors closed), CNG vehicle maintenance equipment noise level exposure is expected to satisfy the Municipal Code interior daytime and evening noise level standards within the interior areas of the nearest residences.

Based on the analysis provided above, project CNG vehicle repair equipment noise level exposure is expected to satisfy the applied City of Paso Robles Municipal Code exterior and interior noise level criteria provided the following specific measures are implemented by the project:

1. All operations within the outdoor CNG vehicle maintenance area should be limited to daytime and/or evening hours only (i.e., no operations during nighttime hours).

2. To reduce the potential for an exceedance of the applied City of Paso Robles Municipal Code noise criteria at the nearest residential uses, air hammers or hydraulic lifts should not be used or installed in the outdoor CNG vehicle maintenance area.

Public Address System
It is unclear at the time of writing this report whether the project will include a public address (PA) system. However, the loudness of a PA system is highly dependent on variables that include system power output, speaker distance and directionality relative to receiver, and volume level.

Thus, it is difficult to quantify project PA system noise exposure with reasonable levels of precision.

Based on the experience of BAC with PA systems, the loudness of the system is typically set above ambient conditions to be clearly heard by its recipients. However, because the Municipal Attachment 9

Page 608 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 14 ends

Code noise level criteria applicable to this project are based on measured ambient conditions, such a configuration would likely exceed acceptable Municipal Code noise level limits.

For BAC to quantify noise associated with a PA system with a high level of precision (should one be proposed), a specific analysis prepared by a sound system designer would be required.

Specifically, specifications for the system including overall noise level exposure at certain distances with consideration of speaker directionality would be needed. In absence of such specifications from a sound designer, it is the recommendation of BAC that the professional installer of the PA system (should one be proposed), ensure through analysis and testing that the equipment does not exceed 65 dB Lmax at the nearest residential property lines. An overall PA system noise level of 65 dB Lmax at the nearest residential property lines would avoid the potential for an exceedance of the Municipal Code’s daytime and evening maximum noise level standards at those locations.

Conclusions and Recommendations
This analysis concludes that noise generated by on-site truck circulation is expected to satisfy the applied City of Paso Robles daytime and evening exterior and interior noise level limits at the nearest residential uses to the south of the project. This analysis further concludes that equipment noise levels from service department and CNG vehicle maintenance activities are expected to satisfy the applied City of Paso Robles daytime and evening exterior and interior noise level limits at the nearest residential uses to the south of the project provided that the following specific measures are implemented by the project:

1. On-site truck circulation, service department operations, and outdoor CNG vehicle maintenance area activities should be limited to daytime and/or evening hours only (i.e., no operations during nighttime hours).

2. Operations within the service department area of the building should occur with south and west side bay doors in the closed position at all times while air hammer usage is occurring.

3. To reduce the potential for an exceedance of the applied Municipal Code noise level criteria at the nearest residential uses, air hammers or hydraulic lifts should not be used or installed in the outdoor CNG vehicle maintenance area.

Finally, it is unclear at the time of writing this report whether the project will include a public address (PA) system. Should one be proposed, it is the recommendation of BAC that the professional installer of the PA system ensure through analysis and testing that the equipment does not exceed 65 dB Lmax at the nearest residential property lines. An overall PA system noise level of 65 dB Lmax at the nearest residential property lines would avoid the potential for an exceedance of the Municipal Code’s daytime and evening maximum noise level standards at those locations.

Attachment 9

Page 609 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center – Paso Robles, California

Page 15 ends

These conclusions are based on the data and assumptions cited herein and on the site plan shown in Figure 2. Any substantive revisions to the project site plan or proposed operations could cause actual noise levels to vary relative to those predicted herein. BAC is not responsible for such revisions.

This concludes BAC’s environmental noise assessment for the proposed Peterbilt Service and Sales Center in Paso Robles, California. Please contact BAC at (530) 537-2328 or [email protected] with any questions regarding this assessment.

Attachment 9

Page 610 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Appendix A
Acoustical Terminology
Acoustics The science of sound.

Ambient Noise The distinctive acoustical characteristics of a given space consisting of all noise sources audible at that location. In many cases, the term ambient is used to describe an existing or pre-project condition such as the setting in an environmental noise study.

Attenuation The reduction of an acoustic signal.

A-Weighting A frequency-response adjustment of a sound level meter that conditions the output signal to approximate human response.

Decibel or dB Fundamental unit of sound. A Bell is defined as the logarithm of the ratio of the sound pressure squared over the reference pressure squared. A Decibel is one-tenth of a Bell.

CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level. Defined as the 24-hour average noise level with noise occurring during evening hours (7 - 10 p.m.) weighted by a factor of three and nighttime hours weighted by a factor of 10 prior to averaging.

Frequency The measure of the rapidity of alterations of a periodic signal, expressed in cycles per second or hertz.

IIC Impact Insulation Class (IIC): A single-number representation of a floor/ceiling partition’s impact generated noise insulation performance. The field-measured version of this number is the FIIC.

Ldn Day/Night Average Sound Level. Similar to CNEL but with no evening weighting.

Leq Equivalent or energy-averaged sound level.

Lmax The highest root-mean-square (RMS) sound level measured over a given period of time.

Loudness A subjective term for the sensation of the magnitude of sound.

Masking The amount (or the process) by which the threshold of audibility is for one sound is raised by the presence of another (masking) sound.

Noise Unwanted sound.

Peak Noise The level corresponding to the highest (not RMS) sound pressure measured over a given period of time. This term is often confused with the “Maximum” level, which is the highest RMS level.

RT60 The time it takes reverberant sound to decay by 60 dB once the source has been removed.

STC Sound Transmission Class (STC): A single-number representation of a partition’s noise insulation performance. This number is based on laboratory-measured, 16-band (1/3- octave) transmission loss (TL) data of the subject partition. The field-measured version of this number is the FSTC.
.-/]\\\\ BOLLARD ""J J)} Acoustical Consultants
Attachment 9

Page 611 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Legend
A Noise survey location facing north towards project site B Looking towards noise survey location near residential uses (equipment outlined in red) A
B
C
C Noise survey location facing east towards Theatre Drive and U.S. 101 Peterbilt Service & Sales Center
Paso Robles, California
Noise Survey Photographs
Appendix B
□
□
□
Attachment 9

Page 612 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
2:00 PM 52 68 50 48
3:00 PM 49 61 49 47 High Low Average High Low Average High Low Average 4:00 PM 50 63 49 48 Leq (Average) 57 49 54 54 52 53 56 45 52 5:00 PM 49 62 48 46 Lmax (Maximum) 69 58 64 66 62 64 70 58 62 6:00 PM 53 66 53 49 L50 (Median) 57 48 52 53 51 52 55 43 48 7:00 PM 54 65 53 50 L90 (Background) 54 46 50 50 48 48 53 39 44 8:00 PM 52 62 51 48
9:00 PM 53 66 52 48
10:00 PM 51 60 50 46 Computed CNEL, dB 59
11:00 PM 50 70 47 41 % Daytime Energy 59%
12:00 AM 47 58 45 41 % Evening Energy 13%
1:00 AM 48 60 45 41 % Nighttime Energy 28%
2:00 AM 45 59 43 39
3:00 AM 48 62 45 39
4:00 AM 52 64 50 44
5:00 AM 56 64 55 53
6:00 AM 55 64 55 52
7:00 AM 57 64 57 54
8:00 AM 56 63 55 53
9:00 AM 55 62 54 52
10:00 AM 55 65 54 51
11:00 AM 51 58 51 48
12:00 PM 55 69 52 49
1:00 PM 53 67 53 50
GPS Coordinates 35°34'38.28"N
120°41'56.68"W
Daytime (7 a.m. - 7 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.)
Statistical Summary
Evening (7 p.m. - 10 p.m.)
Monday, June 6, 2022 - Tuesday, June 7, 2022
Appendix C
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center - Paso Robles, California I I

BOLLARD
Acoustical Consultants
Attachment 9

Page 613 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Computed CNEL = 59 dB
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results
Peterbilt Service and Sales Center - Paso Robles, California Monday, June 6, 2022 - Tuesday, June 7, 2022
Appendix D
25 35
45 55
65 75
85 95
105
2:00 PM 6:00 PM 10:00 PM 2:00 AM 6:00 AM 10:00 AM 1:00 PM Sound Level, dBA
Hour of Day
- Average (Leq) - Maximum (Lmax) - L50 - L90

BOLLARD
Acoustical Consultants
Attachment 9

Page 614 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
(805) 316-0101
895 Napa Avenue Suite A-6, Morro Bay, CA 93442

MEMORANDUM
Date: July 22, 2022
To: David Athey and Kristin Ferravanti, City of Paso Robles From: Joe Fernandez and Korinne Tarien, CCTC
Subject: 2805 Theatre Drive Peterbilt Dealership Transportation Analysis This memorandum summarizes the trip generation, safety, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) evaluation of the 34,552 square foot building proposed at 2805 Theatre Drive in the City of Paso Robles. The building would be used for retail and services for semi-trucks and includes an on-site dealership. The site plan is shown on Figure

1. The proposed project is expected to have a less-than-significant impact to VMT.

We recommend the driveway widths be reduced to meet City standards and that the Theatre Drive improvements are constructed to accommodate two travel lanes, bike lanes, and a center left turn lane. We also recommend parking on Nutwood Circle be restricted on both sides of the road from the curb return to 20 feet west.

TRIP GENERATION
The proposed project does not conform to standard uses in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ Trip Generation Manual. Accordingly, new traffic counts were conducted at a similar facility operated by the applicant in Salinas. Like the proposed project, the Salinas facility is located near US 101 and offers similar services in a similar sized building. Table 1 below summarizes the trip counts collected at the Salinas facility, with detailed count sheets attached.

Table 1: Peterbilt Trip Generation (Elvee Drive, Salinas) The collected data shows that the Salinas facility generates approximately 178 daily, 41 AM, and 45 PM peak hour trips. It is assumed that the proposed project would generate a similar number of trips with fewer than 50 peak hour trips. These trips are likely to be roughly evenly split between the north and the south, gaining access to US 101 via the SR 46W and Main Street interchanges.

CEQA ANALYSIS
Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) were analyzed consistent with recently mandated changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and state Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidance. The City’s 2022 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines Supplement provide VMT and safety thresholds consistent with OPR guidance. Office and industrial projects may have a significant impact if the work VMT per employee exceeds 85 percent of the regional average. Work VMT captures home-based-work attractions (trips from homes to workplaces).

Daily
Land Use Total In Out Total In Out Total
Peterbilt - Salinas 178 28 13 41 19 26 45
Elvee Drive Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Source: Metro Traffic Data, CCTC, 2022.
- Central Coast Transportation ~'Consulting ~
Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning ,•·~-~....,,,,.1-r---.,.:,_;, .. - --- ·-·~ I""~ r--_ _,__,. __.,-- /...- Attachment 9

Page 615 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
2805 Theatre Drive Peterbilt Dealership Transportation Analysis 2 Central Coast Transportation Consulting July 22, 2022
The SLOCOG Travel Demand Model was applied to estimate VMT. Project employees were estimated using typical square footage per employee from industry standard sources, then were added to the model. Table 2 summarizes the VMT results.

Table 2: Regional VMT Analysis
The regional average work VMT per employee is 13.60 (1,595,867/117,335). A threshold of 85% of this level corresponds to 11.56 work VMT per employee. The project is forecast to have a work VMT per employee of

3.3, well below the threshold. This is due to the provision of jobs in a housing-rich area. Therefore, the project would have a less-than-significant impact to VMT.

Projects may also have a significant impact if they exacerbate an existing high-priority or similar safety location, introduce a design feature that substantially increases hazards, or propose features that do not meet City design standards.

Collision data was obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for Templeton CHP and City police on Theatre Drive in the vicinity of the project between 2017 and 2021. One injury collision occurred near Ranch Paso Road when a bicycle was traveling the wrong way. No collisions occurred at or near Nutwood Circle. There are no observed collision patterns and no recommendations.

SITE ACCESS AND ON SITE CIRCULATION
The project proposes two driveways one on Theater Drive and one on Nutwood Circle. The proposed driveway on Theatre Drive is 50 feet wide, larger than a standard commercial driveway. City Standard Drawing C-9 specifies a maximum driveway width of 30 feet. We recommend both driveways meet City Standards.

The project will be required to complete frontage improvements on Theatre Drive as currently shown on the site plan in Figure 1. The City and County Bike Plans include future Class II bike lanes on Theatre Drive. We recommend the Theatre Drive frontage improvements be designed to accommodate two travel lanes, bike lanes, and a center left turn lane. Parking is not recommended on Theatre Drive. We also recommend parking on Nutwood Circle be restricted on both sides of the road from the curb return to 20 feet west consistent with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD).

Please let us know if you have any questions.

ATTACHMENTS
Site Plan Figure
Salinas Peterbilt Counts
Scenario
Regional
Employees
Regional
Work VMT
2020 No Project 117,335 1,595,867
2020 With Project 117,373 1,596,553
Change from No Project 38 686
Source: SLOCOG TDM, CCTC, 2022

1. Work VMT is attracted to workplaces (sum of home-based-work attractions). Threshold calculated as 85% of regional average.

Regional VMT Analysis
Attachment 9

Page 616 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
July 2022 Peterbilt Paso Robles Figure 1 - Site Plan Theater Dr Nutwood Circle
Source: studio 2G Architects, LLP N
NTS
t
~ --~--- -~O
~}) INVENTORY PARKING [JO SPACES)
SERVICE PAR:Kl'NG (IS SPACES)
EMPLOYEE PA, <JNC 127 SPACES) () CUSTOMER PARKING (20 SPACES) PARKJJ,,IG lANDSCAPlr-,o (26,268 SFJ
- Central Coast T ransportatioriCoffiiltmg
Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning _. _
~ r--;;-
Attachment 9

Page 617 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Morro Bay, CA 93442
www.metrotrafficdata.com

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 6
8:00 AM 1 1 3 1 6 0 1 0 2 3 9
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 1 1 2 2 6 1 0 0 4 5 11
4:00 PM 2 4 0 1 7 3 1 5 2 11 18
5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 23
AM% 33.3% AM Peak 14 8:00 am to 9:00 am AM P.H.F. 0.70
PM% 66.7% PM Peak 32 4:30 pm to 5:30 pm PM P.H.F. 0.67

Page 1 of 2 ends

Hourly
Totals
Inbound Outbound
Total 48.9% 51.1%
45 24 Hour Count Report
Clear
Elvee Dr @ Peterbilt Western Driveway
Monterey
Thursday, June 2, 2022
2 36.6673123
-121.6312846
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 # of vehicles
Time Period
Inbound
Outbound
Metro]affic
~
Data Inc. ----------
----- ---- -- - - - - -- - -- -
--
Attachment 9

Page 618 of 692 ends

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 2 5 6 13 26 0 2 5 2 9 35
8:00 AM 5 2 6 2 15 2 2 4 3 11 26
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 5 3 2 10 5 1 6 2 14 24
4:00 PM 4 7 0 1 12 5 4 4 2 15 27
5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 12 7 0 1 20 21
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
64 69
AM% 45.9% AM Peak 98 5:30 am to 6:30 am AM P.H.F. 0.58
PM% 54.1% PM Peak 37 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm PM P.H.F. 0.93

Page 2 of 2 ends

2 24 Hour Count Report

36.666952
-121.6301178
Clear
Elvee Dr @ Peterbilt Eastern Driveway
Monterey
Thursday, June 2, 2022
Inbound Outbound Hourly
Totals
Total 48.1% 51.9%
133
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 # of vehicles
Time Period
Inbound
Outbound
Metro]affic
~
Data Inc. ----------
----- ---- -- - - - - -- - -- -
--
Attachment 9

Page 619 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 1 of 18
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Project File No./Name: Peterbilt Sales and Service Center Approving Resolution No.: by: Planning Commission City Council Date: June 20, 2023 The following environmental mitigation measures were either incorporated into the approved plans or will be incorporated into the conditions of approval. Each and every mitigation measure listed below has been found by the approving body indicated above to lessen the level of environmental impact of the project to a level of non-significance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that it has been completed.

Explanation of Headings:

Type: ............................................................ Project, ongoing, cumulative Monitoring Department or Agency: ........ Department or Agency responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure Shown on Plans: .........................................When a mitigation measure is shown on the plans, this column will be initialed and dated.

Verified Implementation: ..........................When a mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated.

Remarks: ...................................................... Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information.

Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AES-1. Any lights installed to illuminate the billboard shall be external and shielded so that the light source is not visible from roadways or properties zoned for
residential use. The applicant shall use the least amount of light practicable for the purpose of illuminating the sign. The applicant shall provide a photometric plan
before issuance of a building permit to demonstrate the proposed lighting will not spill onto any residentially zoned property.

Project City of Paso
Robles
Community
Development
Department
(CDD)
X Field inspection. Prior to final building
inspection / occupancy of the
building
AES-2. The freeway-oriented sign shall not exceed 30
feet in height.

Project CDD X Field inspection. Prior to final building inspection / occupancy of the
building

Page 620 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 2 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AES-3. Any future freeway-oriented sign for a business
developed on the southern portion of the lot shall be
collocated on the same sign structure as the freewayoriented sign for the Peterbilt project.

Cumula
tive
CDD X Before planning submittal for
undeveloped area
AES-4. The applicant shall provide and maintain
landscaping and street trees along the entire length of both street frontages to the satisfaction of the Director of the Community Development Department. Street
trees are not required on the remainder portion of the
lot.

Project CDD X Landscaping plan.

Field Inspection.

Prior to final building
inspection / occupancy of the
building
AQ-1. Maintain all construction equipment in proper
tune according to manufacturer’s specifications.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-2. Fuel all off-road and portable diesel-powered
equipment with California Air Resources Board (CARB)
certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version
suitable for use off-road.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-3. Use diesel construction equipment meeting
CARB's Tier 2 certified engines or cleaner off-road
heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State
off-Road Regulation.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit

Page 621 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 3 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AQ-4. Use on-road heavy-duty trucks that meet the
CARB’s 2010 or cleaner certification standard for
on-road heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the
State On-Road Regulation.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-5. All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. Signs shall be posted in the
designated queuing areas and or job sites to remind
drivers and operators of the 5-minute idling limit.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents. Site
inspection of signs.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit Prior to issuance of
grading permit
AQ-6. All projects with diesel-powered construction
activity shall comply with Section 2485 of Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations and the 5-minute idling
restriction identified in Section 2449(d)(2) of the
California Air Resources Board’s In-Use Off-Road Diesel regulation to minimize toxic air pollution impacts from idling diesel engines. The specific requirements and
exceptions for the on-road and off-road regulations can be reviewed at the following web sites:
arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/msprog/truckidling and arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/ordiesl07/frooal.pdf Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents. Site
inspection of signs.

Prior to issuance of a grading
permit
AQ-7. Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive
receptors is not permitted.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit

Page 622 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 4 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AQ-8. Staging and queuing areas shall not be located
within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-9. The applicant shall post and enforce no idling
areas at the site.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of a grading
permit
AQ-10. Electrify equipment when feasible. Project CDD X Notes shown on construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-11. Substitute gasoline-powered in place of dieselpowered equipment, where feasible. Project CDD X Notes shown on construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-12. Use alternatively fueled construction equipment
on-site where feasible, such as compressed natural gas
(CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), propane or biodiesel.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-13. Diesel equipment used to construct the site shall install California Verified Diesel Emission Control
Strategies listed at:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/verdev/vt/cvt.htm.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-14. 15% of construction fleet vehicles shall be zero emission vehicles.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-15. The project shall include alternative fuel fleet vehicle(s).

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit

Page 623 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 5 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AQ-16. The project shall reduce the amount of
disturbed area where possible.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-17. The project shall use water trucks or sprinkler
systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site and from exceeding the APCD’s
limit of 20% opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any
60-minute period. Increased watering frequency is
required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph.

Reclaimed (non-potable) water shall be used whenever
possible. When drought conditions exist and water use
is a concern, the contractor or builder shall consider use of a dust suppressant that is effective for the specific site conditions to reduce the amount of water used for
dust control. Refer to
http://www.valleyair.org/busind/comply/PM10/Product
s%20Available%20for%20Controlling%20PM10%20Emis
sions.htm for a list of potential dust suppressants.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents. Site
inspections.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-18. All dirt stock-pile areas shall be sprayed daily and covered with tarps or other barriers as needed.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents. Site
inspections.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-19. Permanent dust control measures identified in
the approved project revegetation and landscape plans
shall be implemented as soon as possible following
completion of any soil disturbing activities.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit

Page 624 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 6 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AQ-20. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be
reworked at dates greater than one month after initial
grading shall be sown with a fast germinating, noninvasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-21. All disturbed soil areas not subject to
revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-22. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be
paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In
addition, building pads should be laid as soon as
possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-23. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the
construction site.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-24. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials shall be covered or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between
top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC
Section 23114.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit

Page 625 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 7 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AQ-25. The applicant shall sweep streets at the end of
each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water
shall be used where feasible. Roads shall be pre-wetted prior to sweeping when feasible.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents. Site
Inspections.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-26. The applicant shall install wheel washers where
vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets or
wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents. Site
inspections.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-27. The contractor or builder shall designate a
person or persons whose responsibility is to ensure any to monitor the fugitive dust emissions do not result in a nuisance and to enhance the implementation of the
mitigation measures as necessary to minimize dust
complaints, and reduce visible emissions below the
APCD’s limit of 20% opacity for greater than 3 minutes
in any 60-minute period, and to prevent transport of
dust offsite. Their duties shall include holidays and
weekend periods when work may not be in progress (for
example, wind-blown dust could be generated on an
open dirt lot). The name and telephone number of such
persons shall be provided to the APCD Compliance
Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork, or Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit

Page 626 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 8 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
demolition (Contact the Compliance Division at 805-
781-5912).

AQ-28. The applicant shall take additional measures as
needed to ensure dust from the project site does not
impact areas outside the project boundary.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-29. To prevent ‘track out’ (sand or soil that adheres to and/or agglomerates on the exterior surfaces of
motor vehicles and/or equipment (including tires) that
may then fall onto any highway or street as described in CVC Section 23113 and California Water Code 13304),
the applicant shall designate access points and require all employees, subcontractors, and others to use them.

The applicant shall install and operate a ‘track-out
prevention device’ where vehicles enter and exit
unpaved roads onto paved streets. The ‘track-out
prevention device’ can be any device or combination of
devices that are effective at preventing track out,
located at the point of intersection of an unpaved area and a paved road. Rumble strips or steel plate devices
need periodic cleaning to be effective. If paved
roadways accumulate tracked out soils, the track-out
prevention device may need to be modified.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-30. All fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be
shown on grading and building plans.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit

Page 627 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 9 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AQ-31. The applicant shall acquire all required APCD
permits for portable equipment greater than 50 hp used
during construction activities.

Project CDD and
APCD
X Submittal with
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-32. The applicant shall acquire all required APCD
permits for operational stationary diesel engines greater than 50 hp.

Project CDD and
APCD
X Submittal with
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
AQ-33. Before issuance of a building permit, the
applicant shall prepare a screening-level health risk
assessment with risk screening inputs including:
• Daily operational phase trips to the project site;
• % of daily trips that are diesel trucks and their
anticipated make up (i.e. heavy-heavy duty, mediumheavy duty, light-heavy duty); • Total daily diesel trips to site;
• Number of days per year project location will be open; • Total annual diesel trips; and
• Distance from midpoint of truck service center to lot of nearest sensitive receptor.

Project CDD and
APCD
X Submittal with
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit

Page 628 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 10 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
If the screening assessment is above 10 in a million, a more comprehensive health risk analysis shall be
required. Results of the screening and/or the refined
health risk assessment shall be provided to the APCD for review and approval.

AQ-34. Developmental burning of vegetative material is
prohibited.

Project CDD X Ongoing
BIO-1. All construction work activities shall be
completed during daylight hours (between sunrise and
sunset) and outside of rain events.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit
BIO-2. The Project impact area shall be clearly marked
or delineated with stakes, flagging, tape, or signage
prior to work. Areas outside of work limits shall be
considered environmentally sensitive and shall not be
disturbed.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents. Site
inspection.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit.

BIO-3. All equipment and vehicles shall be checked and
maintained daily to prevent spills of fuel, oil, and other hazardous materials. A designated staging area shall be established for vehicle/equipment parking and storage
of fuel, lubricants, and solvents. All fueling and
Project CDD x Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Site Inspection.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit

Page 629 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 11 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
maintenance activities shall take place in the staging
area.

BIO-4. If vegetation removal (i.e., tree
trimming/removal activities) is scheduled between
February 1 and August 31 (general nesting bird season), nesting bird surveys shall be completed by a qualified
biologist within 48 hours prior to start of work. If any active nests are discovered within or adjacent to work
limits, an appropriate buffer (i.e., 500 feet for raptors and 250 feet for other birds, or at the discretion of a qualified biologist based on biological or ecological
reasons) shall be established to protect the nest until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest is no
longer active and/or the young have fledged.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents. Site
inspection
Prior to issuance of grading
permit
BIO-5. Within 30 days of the start of construction, a
qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-activity survey of the Project Site for signs of San Joaquin kit fox and
American badger, including tracks, scat, or suitable
burrows (burrows four inches or greater in diameter).

Potential dens shall be tracked for a minimum of four
nights with motion-activated cameras to determine if
the burrow is actively being used by San Joaquin kit fox or badger. All potential dens shall be avoided by a
minimum of 50 feet until they have been determined to
be inactive. In the event San Joaquin kit fox is identified Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit

Page 630 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 12 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
within the Project Site, the USFWS, CDFW, and all other appropriate agencies/government entities shall be
contacted for further consultation.

In conjunction with the badger and kit fox survey, the
qualified biologist will conduct a survey for Northern
legless lizard. Hand search methods, including raking,
will be used during the survey in areas where legless
lizards are expected to be found (e.g., sandy/loose soils, under shrubs/leaf litter, other vegetation, or debris). If observed, the qualified biologist will relocate the lizard to nearby suitable habitat. The qualified biologist will prepare a completion letter-report to document the
pre-activity survey results.

BIO-6. If oak tree removal and/or damage is
unavoidable due to Project implementation, 25% of the
diameter of trees removed shall be replanted on the
site.

Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction
documents. Site
inspection.

Prior to issuance of grading
permit and building permit
and ongoing during the
duration of construction.

CUL-1. In the event that buried or otherwise unknown
cultural resources are discovered during construction
work in the area of the find shall be suspended and the City of Paso Robles shall be contacted immediately, and appropriate mitigations measures shall be developed by
qualified archeologist or historian if necessary, at the developers expense.

Project CDD X Notes on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuance of grading
and building permits.

Page 631 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 13 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
CUL-2. In the event human remains are found on the
project site during construction or during archaeological work, the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, shall immediately
notify the San Luis Obispo County Coroner’s office by
telephone. No further excavation or disturbance of the
discovery or any nearby area reasonably suspected to
overlie adjacent remains (as determined by the qualified archaeologist and/or the Native American monitor) shall occur until the Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition. If the Coroner recognizes the remains to be Native American, he or she shall
contact the Native American Heritage Commission
(NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC would make a
determination as to the Most Likely Descendent.

Project SLO County
Coroner,
Native
American
Heritage
Commission
X As needed Ongoing during grading and
construction.

GEO-1. The applicant shall provide a soils report for the project.

Project CDD X Shown on building
plans.

Before building permit
issuance.

GEO-2. The applicant shall provide a stormwater
pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for the project.

Project CDD X Shown on building
plans.

Before building permit
issuance.

GHG-1. The applicant shall submit a plan to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions to below the applicable GHG
significance threshold (1.9 MTCO2e/service
population/year or other adopted GHG significance
threshold). The plan shall incorporate GHG-reduction
Project CDD X Ongoing Plan submitted before
building permit issuance.

Monitoring ongoing.

Page 632 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 14 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
measures that may include, but are not limited to the
following list.

Onsite mitigation measures shall be the first priority of the GHG Reduction Plan, including but not limited to:
a. Receive electricity from onsite solar, Central
Coast Community Energy (3CE) 3Cprime Service,
or a combination thereof.
b. Design roof structural members to handle dead
weight loads of solar-heated water and
photovoltaic panels.
c. Install only Energy Star certified or equivalent
and electrically powered mechanical equipment
and appliances (not natural gas).
d. Implement on-site circulation design elements in
parking lots to reduce vehicle queuing and
improve the pedestrian environment.
e. Exceed Cal Green standards by 25% for providing
on-site bicycle parking: both short-term racks
and long-term lockers, or a locked room with
standard racks and access limited to bicyclists
only.
f. Provide improved public transit amenities (e.g.:
covered transit turnouts, direct pedestrian
access, bicycle racks, covered bench, smart

Page 633 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 15 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
signage, route information displays, lighting,
etc.).
g. Require 15% of fleet vehicles to be zero emission
vehicles.
h. Require fleet vehicle(s) to include alternative fuel vehicles.
i. Provide dedicated parking for carpools,
vanpools, and/or high-efficiency vehicles to meet
or exceed Cal Green Tier 2.
j. Provide vanpool, shuttle, mini bus service
(alternative fueled preferred).
k. Work with SLO Regional Rideshare to educate
occupants with alternative transportation and
smart commute information (e.g. transportation
board, electronic kiosk, new hire packets, web
portal, newsletters, social media, etc.).
l. Implement programs to reduce employee
vehicle miles traveled (e.g. incentives, SLO
Regional Rideshare trip reduction program,
vanpools, onsite employee housing, alternative
schedules (e.g. 9-80s, 4-10s, telecommuting,
satellite work sites, etc.).
m. Provide a lunchtime shuttle to reduce single
occupant vehicle trips and/or coordinate regular
food truck visits.
n. Provide delivery service in clean fueled vehicles.

Page 634 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 16 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
o. Implement a “No Idling” vehicle program which
includes signage, enforcement, etc.
p. Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for
providing EV charging infrastructure.
q. Install 1 or more level 2 or better EV charging
stations.
r. Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for
building energy efficiency.
s. Use battery powered or electric landscape
maintenance equipment.
t. Use paints and cleaning products that are lowVOC content (e.g., 50 grams/liter VOC content, or less).

Offsite measures within San Luis Obispo County shall be the second priority of the GHG Reduction Plan, including but not limited to:
u. Work with SLOCOG to create, improve, or
expand a nearby 'Park and Ride' lot with car
parking and bike lockers in proportion to the size
of the project.
v. Implement SLO County generated offsets
compliant with a protocol approved by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).

Page 635 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 17 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
Offsite measures within California shall be the third
priority of the GHG Reduction Plan, including but not
limited to:
w. Implement California generated offsets
compliant with a protocol approved by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).

Offsite measures within North America shall be the
fourth priority of the GHG Reduction Plan, including but not limited to:
x. Implement North American generated offsets
compliant with a protocol approved by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).

HAZ-1. Operation of the project shall not include diesel or other vehicle fuel dispensing or the painting of
vehicles.

Ongoin
g
CDD X Shown on building
plans.

Before building permit
issuance.

HAZ-2. The project shall acquire and maintain all
required permits and approvals from the SLO County
Department of Environmental Health for the handling
and storage of hazardous materials.

Ongoin
g
SLO County
Environmenta
l Health
Department
X Required before
building permit
issuance
Before final building
inspection.

N-1. On-site truck circulation, service department
operations, and outdoor CNG vehicle maintenance area
Ongoin
g
CDD Ongoing enforcement.

Page 636 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 18 of 18
Mitigation Measure
PD22-02 / CUP22-16 / RZN22-03 / P22-0017 and
CUP23-03 / P23-0019
(Peterbilt and Outfront Media)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown
on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
activities shall be limited to daytime hours only (7am – 7pm).

N-2. South and west service bay doors shall be in the
closed position at all times while air hammer equipment is in use.

Ongoin
g
CDD Ongoing enforcement.

N-3. No air hammers or hydraulic lifts shall be used or installed outside the indoor service area including the outdoor CNG vehicle maintenance area.

Ongoin
g
CDD Shown on building
plans.

Before building permit
issuance and ongoing
enforcement.

N-4. Any amplified public address system shall be
designed to not exceed 65dB Lmax at the nearest
residential property line.

Project
/
Ongoin
g
CDD Results of noise
analysis and
testing of system
submitted to City.

Before building permit
issuance.
(add additional measures as necessary)
Explanation of Headings:

Verified Implementation: ..........................When a mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated.

Remarks: ...................................................... Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information.

Page 637 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
GSA Board Agenda
From: Christopher Alakel, Utilities Director
Subject: Receive and file a proposed Statement of Equity and consider incorporating principles stated therein, in coordination with the other GSAs, into the next update of the Paso Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP)
CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Date: June 20, 2023
Facts

1. In 2014, the California State Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) which required local management of groundwater resources in California through the formation of Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) and through preparation and implementation of Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs).

2. The City of Paso Robles and three other local agencies (County of San Luis Obispo, the Shandon-San Juan Water District, and the San Miguel Community Services District) within the Paso Groundwater Subbasin (Basin), voted to form a GSA within their respective jurisdiction, such that the service areas of the GSAs collectively cover the entire Basin. These agencies are collectively referred to as the “Paso Basin GSAs.”

3. Consistent with the options identified in Water Code Section 10727, the Paso Basin GSAs entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the purpose of preparing a single GSP for the Basin and establishing the Paso Basin Cooperative Committee (PBCC) to conduct activities related to GSP development and SGMA implementation.

4. On June 21, 2022, the Paso Robles GSA Board adopted a revised Groundwater Sustainability Plan that was submitted to DWR on July 19, 2022 to comply with SGMA requirements. The next update of the GSP will be completed by January of 2025.

5. PBCC members voted unanimously at their April 26, 2023 regular meeting to have their GSAs consider adopting the Statement of Equity (attached) or otherwise incorporate the principles stated therein, in coordination with the other GSAs, into the next update of the GSP.

6. If incorporated into the GSP, the principles outlined in the Statement of Equity will be used to evaluate and rank future management actions and projects.

Options

1. Do nothing;

2. Receive and file with direction to staff to work in cooperation with other GSA’s to incorporate the Statement of Equity into the next update of the GSP;

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Page 638 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Analysis and Conclusions
With the approval of the GSP, the GSAs are now focused on implementation of the projects and management actions that are identified in the GSP. Implementation measures will include bringing supplemental water into the Basin, which can be used in lieu of groundwater pumping. Potential supplemental sources of water that are being considered include the use of recycled wastewater from the City of Paso Robles and San Miguel Community Services District. Other supplemental water supply sources under consideration include the potential use of turn-back-pool water from the Nacimiento Pipeline Project partners, water from The State Water Project and expansion of the Salinas Dam. In conjunction with supplemental water supply projects under consideration, the GSAs are in the preliminary phases of developing management actions and programs that will be designed to reduce groundwater pumping across the Basin. Special consideration will be given to improving groundwater conditions in areas of the Basin where rural residents rely on domestic wells for their sole supply of drinking water.

With GSP implementation efforts underway, the PBCC members agreed that groundwater in the Basin is a shared resource that the GSAs seek to manage for the benefit of all Basin users, consistent with their rights under the California Constitution and state statutes. Sustainable management of a reliable groundwater supply is crucial to the ongoing health and wellbeing of our communities’ residents and their economic interests.

To ensure that the commitment to fairness, among all those dependent on groundwater in the Basin, is considered as part of the implementation of the GSP and subsequent management of the Basin, the PBCC members voted unanimously at their April 26, 2023 to consider incorporating the concept of fairness with the proposed Statement of Equity into the next GSP update. Specifically, this means management actions and projects undertaken to balance the Basin will be evaluated against the Statement of Equity.

Fiscal Impact
None
CEQA
The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (b)(2)-(3), 15378.

Recommendation
Staff has no recommendation for this item.

Attachments

1. Statement of Equity

Page 639 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

PASO BASIN COORDINATING COMMITTEE

PROPOSED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
April 28, 2023
Groundwater in the Paso Robles Subbasin is a shared resource that the GSAs that are party to this GSP seek to manage for the benefit of all Subbasin users, consistent with their rights under the California Constitution and state statutes. The management framework established by SGMA and this GSP is inherently focused on assuring both sustainable and equitable access to and use of this shared resource.

Sustainable management of a reliable groundwater supply is crucial to the ongoing health and wellbeing of our communities’ residents and their economic interests, especially our valued agricultural economy – and also crucial to the natural environment upon which that economy depends.

The concept of equity is explicit in state statute. As noted on the State Water Resources Control Board website, in Water Code Section 106.3 “the state statutorily recognizes that ‘every human being has the right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water adequate for human consumption, cooking, and sanitary purposes.’ The human right to water extends to all Californians, including disadvantaged individuals and groups and communities in rural and urban areas.”
Achieving equitable access to Subbasin groundwater faces several challenges:
• Users are located in diverse settings relative to the Subbasin’s hydrogeology. • Users’ water supplies are managed in diverse jurisdictional settings (a city, a community services district, a county service area, small mutual water supply systems and individual wells in unincorporated rural areas).
• The Subbasin includes diverse land use patterns, including highly urbanized areas, rural residential lots, and both small and large irrigated agricultural operations, some of which include commercial facilities such as wineries, tasting rooms and lodging. • Within irrigated agricultural operations – which collectively use the vast majority of groundwater – there is currently wide variation in the amount of irrigation water applied (acreft/acre), depending on crop type and cultural practice. • The economic resources of individual Subbasin users vary widely. • As stated in Water Code Section 10720.5, no action under SGMA can alter groundwater rights as determined under California common law or statute.

The central premise of SGMA is that the Subbasin’s groundwater is sustainably managed and reasonably accessible to all users. Management actions in this GSP will be developed to seek equity in light of the diverse conditions noted.

Equity in achieving these goals requires that no user is precluded from maintaining reasonable access to groundwater because they lack financial resources. For example, the management ATTACHMENT 1

Page 640 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
objectives and minimum thresholds outlined in this GSP (Chapter 8) admit the possibility of shallow wells going dry. Such wells often serve disadvantaged residential communities and users who may be challenged to pay for improvements like deepening the well or drilling a new one.

Issues of equity should also be addressed in the distribution of water used for irrigation on different crop production sites. All GSP management efforts (supply enhancement, demand reduction, use allocations) should provide equitable opportunity for all land owners to participate and provide equitable allocation of costs and incentives.

All GSAs responsible for the development and administration of this GSP agree that the management actions established for the Paso Robles Subbasin will uphold the principles of equity outlined above.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 641 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Council Agenda Report
From: Ryan Cornell, Administrative Services Director
Subject: Approval of Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendments, General Fund Appropriations Limit (Gann Limit), and Master Pay Schedule
CEQA Determination: The City find that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (b)(2)-(3), 15378.

Date: June 20, 2023
Facts

1. The City Council is required to adopt a comprehensive operating and capital expenditure budget in order to authorize the receipt of revenues and to authorize, guide and direct City activities no later than July 1, each year. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 and 2023-24 Operating and Capital Budget for all funds was approved by City Council on June 21, 2022.

2. As the City approaches the beginning of FY 2023-24, each department assessed their budget to see if any changes in appropriations were necessary for the upcoming fiscal year due to unanticipated items that have arisen since the adoption of the original budget. Additionally, some Council approved actions taken in FY 2022-23 also impacted budget appropriations for the upcoming year.

3. The FY 2023-24 Budget Update Report contains all projected revenues, appropriations and transfers, and shall be implemented by the City Manager per Council policies and direction.

4. The FY 2023-24 staffing authorization includes 296.44 full-time equivalent positions, an increase of

1.06 full-time equivalents from previously authorized.

5. Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, added in November 1979 when voters approved Proposition 4, created a restriction on the amount of government revenue which may be appropriated in any fiscal year (commonly known as the “Gann Initiative”), and requires state and local governments to annually approve an appropriations limit.

6. The appropriations limit may be adjusted annually by a factor comprising the percentage change in population within the city or in the county, combined with either the change in California per capita personal income or the change in the local property tax roll due to the addition of new non-residential construction. The data required to complete the calculation is provided by the State of California, Department of Finance.

7. CalPERS requires governing bodies of local agency of local agencies that contract with CalPERS for retirement benefits to approve and adopt a publicly available pay schedule in accordance with public meeting laws. The pay schedule (Exhibit A of Attachment 3) must identify each position by title, the individual pay rate amount or range for the position, and the time base upon which the pay amounts are calculated, and must be posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer’s website (pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5).

Page 642 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Options

1. Take no action;

2. Amend the FY 2023-24 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget, as originally adopted on June 21, 2022, in order to reflect changes in revenues and expenditures anticipated over the coming fiscal year; approve the appropriations limit of $63,225,845 for FY 2023-24, as required by Proposition 4; and approve the Master Pay Schedule;

3. Amend or modify the above options.

Analysis and Conclusions
The purpose of this report is to update the FY 2023-24 budget appropriations based on updated information; this is not a full budget report but rather an update to the report approved by City Council in June 2022. This update includes both estimated revenues and appropriated expenses for the General, Landscape and Lighting District, and Enterprise Funds (Water, Sewer, and Airport). See Attachment No. 3 for further detail.

Fiscal Impact
The total appropriations for FY 2023-24 are $173,050,200, an increase of approximately $7,422,800 when compared to the originally adopted budget. There is no fiscal impact regarding the appropriations limit; the City’s proceeds from taxes and expenditures continue to be below the allowable limit. The appropriations limit is $63,225,845 while the total City appropriations subject to the limit is $61,999,600, which is approximately 98% of the limit.

CEQA
The City find that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (b)(2)-(3), 15378.

Recommendation

1. Approve Resolution 23-XXX(A), amending the Operating and Capital Improvement Budget, Authorized Position Listing and Revised Master Pay Schedule for fiscal year 2023-24, as presented, and direct the City Manager to implement the budget.

2. Approve Resolution 23-XXX(B), approving the appropriations limit of $63,225,845 for fiscal year 2023-

24. Attachments

1. Draft Resolution 23-XXX(A)

2. Draft Resolution 23-XXX(B)

3. FY 2023-24 Budget Report Update

Page 643 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 23-XXXA

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASO ROBLES AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR

MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZED POSITION LISTING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt a comprehensive operating and capital expenditure budget in order to authorize the receipt of revenues and to authorize, guide, and direct the City’s activities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a biannual budget for Fiscal Years 2022-23 and 2023-24 on June 21, 2022; and
WHEREAS, that budget contained all projected revenues, appropriations, and transfers, as well as the number and classification of all approved positions, to be implemented by the City Manager; and WHEREAS, budgets are plans, and plans change as new information comes to light and the environment in which the City operates changes; and
WHEREAS, one year later, it is appropriate to update the FY 2023-24 budget, as necessary.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles does hereby approve and/or direct the following budgetary actions:

1. The proposed amendments to the FY 2023-24 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget in the amount of $7,422,800, as summarized below:

Fund Amendment
General Fund $ 2,612,000
Measure J-20 Fund 590,300
IT Central Service Fund 31,100
Fleet Central Service Fund 64,600
Risk Management CSF (215,800)
Downtown Parking Fund (2,200)
Landscape and Lighting District Fund 219,300
Water Fund 3,561,100
Wastewater Fund 31,161,400
Airport Fund (4,015,700)
Solid Waste Fund 92,800
Capital Improvement Fund (26,789,600)
Economic Vitality Fund (84,300)
Law Enforcement Fund (2,200)
Total $ 7,422,800

2. The proposed amendment to the FY 2023-24 Authorized Position Listing as follows: one additional Records Supervisor; one additional Fire Prevention Specialist II; one additional Community Service Officer; the removal of one Police Officer; and the removal of two part-time Community Services Officers.

Page 644 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Attachment 1

3. The Master Pay Schedule contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby adopted in accordance with CalPERS requirements (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5)
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Paso Robles this 20th day of June 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Steven W. Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk
Exhibit A: Master Pay Schedule

Page 645 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: June 20, 2023
Effective Date: June 20, 2023
Full-Time Biweekly Rates
Job Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Group
Administrative Assistant I $1,726.19 $1,831.40 $1,944.13 $2,063.24 $2,190.37 SEIU Maintenance Specialist I $1,726.19 $1,831.40 $1,944.13 $2,063.24 $2,190.37 SEIU Administrative Assistant II $1,944.13 $2,063.24 $2,189.29 $2,324.43 $2,467.06 SEIU Maintenance Specialist II $1,944.13 $2,063.24 $2,189.29 $2,324.43 $2,467.06 SEIU Maintenance Specialist I (W/WW) $1,983.39 $2,104.38 $2,234.02 $2,370.99 $2,517.20 SEIU Administrative Assistant III $2,200.50 $2,335.66 $2,478.82 $2,629.98 $2,792.37 SEIU/MGMT Maintenance Specialist III $2,200.50 $2,335.66 $2,478.82 $2,629.98 $2,792.37 SEIU Technician I $2,200.50 $2,335.66 $2,478.82 $2,629.98 $2,792.37 SEIU Equipment Mechanic I
Technician I (W/WW) $2,243.78 $2,381.61 $2,527.96 $2,682.32 $2,847.39 SEIU Laboratory Technician I
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator I
Water Treatment Operator I
Water Quality Technician I
Maintenance Specialist II (W/WW) $2,278.24 $2,417.69 $2,565.71 $2,724.20 $2,891.28 SEIU Technician II $2,370.93 $2,516.19 $2,670.58 $2,834.02 $3,008.17 SEIU Community Services Officer
Crime Analyst
Engineering Technician II
Equipment Mechanic II
Planning Technician
Police Officer Recruit
Technician II (W/WW) $2,484.76 $2,636.84 $2,798.24 $2,969.52 $3,151.78 SEIU Laboratory Technician II
Water Treatment Operator II
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator II
Water Quality Technician II
Dispatcher $2,503.60 $2,656.42 $2,818.66 $2,990.93 $3,173.75 POA Maintenance Specialist III (W/WW) $2,507.31 $2,661.41 $2,825.04 $2,997.63 $3,182.18 SEIU

Page 1 ends

Exhibit A

Page 646 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: June 20, 2023
Effective Date: June 20, 2023
Technician III $2,737.35 $2,905.60 $3,082.95 $3,273.08 $3,473.94 SEIU Assistant Planner
Building Inspector
Development Services Technician
Engineering Inspector
Engineering Technician III
Fire Prevention Specialist I
Information Systems Technician III
Supervisor/Professional/Coordinator I $2,737.35 $2,905.60 $3,082.95 $3,273.08 $3,473.94 SEIU/MGMT Administrative Services Coordinator
Adult Services Librarian
Aquatics Coordinator
Civic Engagement Coordinator
Executive Assistant/Deputy City Clerk
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor
Fleet Supervisor
Human Resources Specialist
Landscape Supervisor
Librarian
Outreach Services Librarian
Parking Coordinator
Parks and Trails Supervisor
Payroll/Risk Coordinator
Records Supervisor
Recreation Marketing Coordinator
Senior Accountant
Streets Maintenance Supervisor
Technical Services Librarian
Utility Billing Supervisor
Volunteer Coordinator
Technician III (W/WW) $2,791.31 $2,962.76 $3,144.37 $3,337.73 $3,542.86 SEIU Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator III
Water Treatment Operator III

Page 2 ends

Exhibit A

Page 647 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: June 20, 2023
Effective Date: June 20, 2023
Firefighter* $2,785.44 $2,957.92 $3,140.48 $3,334.24 $3,539.20 IAFF Dispatch Supervisor $2,999.70 $3,183.08 $3,377.78 $3,584.49 $3,803.87 POA Technician IV $3,008.17 $3,192.98 $3,389.02 $3,596.26 $3,817.40 SEIU Fire Prevention Specialist II
Information Systems Technician IV
Senior Building Inspector
Senior Engineering Inspector
Senior Water Quality Inspector
City Clerk $3,064.99 $3,253.56 $3,453.34 $3,665.38 $3,890.80 MGMT Technical Supervisor I (W/WW) $3,066.91 $3,255.48 $3,455.26 $3,667.31 $3,892.72 SEIU Wastewater Collections Supervisor
Wastewater Laboratory Supervisor
Water Quality Supervisor
Professional Manager I $3,145.11 $3,336.86 $3,542.52 $3,759.95 $3,991.21 MGMT Associate Development Review Engineer
Associate Planner
Development Services Manager
Firefighter/Paramedic* $3,123.68 $3,316.32 $3,521.28 $3,738.56 $3,969.28 IAFF Fire Engineer* $3,217.76 $3,417.12 $3,627.68 $3,850.56 $4,088.00 IAFF Police Officer $3,318.35 $3,519.89 $3,736.00 $3,964.48 $4,207.57 POA Technical Supervisor II (W/WW) $3,387.41 $3,595.73 $3,815.81 $4,051.39 $4,300.28 SEIU Wastewater Chief Plant Operator
Water Distribution Supervisor
Water Chief Plant Operator
Fire Engineer/Paramedic $3,605.28 $3,828.16 $4,064.48 $4,314.24 $4,580.80 IAFF Professional Manager II $3,731.08 $3,961.85 $4,205.43 $4,464.46 $4,739.58 MGMT Airport Manager
Assistant Capital Projects Engineer
Deputy Building Official
GIS Analyst
Industrial Waste Manager
Maintenance Services Superintendent
Recreation Services Manager

Page 3 ends

Exhibit A

Page 648 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: June 20, 2023
Effective Date: June 20, 2023
Senior Development Review Engineer
Senior Planner
Solid Waste Manager
Support Services Manager
Stormwater Manager
Water Utility Engineer
Fire Captain* $3,861.76 $4,099.20 $4,352.32 $4,621.12 $4,905.60 IAFF Sergeant $4,175.22 $4,430.63 $4,702.83 $4,992.33 $5,298.62 POA Fire Captain/Paramedic* $4,352.32 $4,621.12 $4,905.60 $5,209.12 $5,530.56 IAFF Professional Manager III $4,762.53 $5,056.89 $5,368.31 $5,698.40 $6,049.34 MGMT Building Official
Capital Projects Engineer
City Engineer
City Librarian
City Planner
Finance Manager
Human Resources/Risk Manager
Information Technology Manager
Public Works Operations Manager
Recycled Water Manager
Utilities Planning and Engineering Manager
Wastewater Manager
Water Resources Manager
Fire Battalion Chief * $5,255.04 $5,578.72 $5,922.56 $6,287.68 $6,675.20 MGMT Police Commander $5,623.04 $5,969.49 $6,336.83 $6,726.72 $7,141.35 MGMT Deputy Fire Chief $5,887.55 $6,251.98 $6,639.01 $7,050.04 $7,486.54 MGMT Executive Manager $5,958.00 $6,326.03 $6,715.41 $7,129.37 $7,568.45 MGMT Administrative Services Director
Assistant City Manager
Community Development Director
Community Services Director
Public Works Director
Utilities Director

Page 4 ends

Exhibit A

Page 649 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: June 20, 2023
Effective Date: June 20, 2023
Safety Executive Manager $6,574.40 $6,980.22 $7,410.24 $7,867.22 $8,351.14 MGMT Fire Chief
Police Chief
City Manager $8,797.50 $8,797.50 Contract
*Bi-weekly and annual totals are based on the average number of hours worked over a 3 year period.

Page 5 ends

Exhibit A

Page 650 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: June 20, 2023
Effective Date: June 20, 2023
Part-Time Hourly Rates
Job Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Group
Staff Aide $16.20 $16.74 $17.28 $17.82 Part-Time
Clerical/Customer Service Aide
Maintenance Aide
Recreation Aide
Aquatics Office Assistant $16.74 $17.28 $17.82 $18.36 Part-Time Staff Assistant I $17.82 $18.36 $18.90 $19.44 Part-Time Library Assistant I
Recreation Leader I
Entry-Level Labor/Maintenance
Lifeguard/Swim Instructor $17.28 $18.36 $19.44 $20.52 Part-Time Staff Assistant II $20.25 $20.79 $21.33 $21.87 Part-Time Journey-Level Labor/Maintenance
Library Assistant II
Police Records Cadet
Recreation Leader II
Staff Assistant III $22.95 $23.49 $24.03 $24.57 Part-Time Advanced-Level Labor/Maintenance
Assistant Police Dispatcher
Community Services Officer
Engineering Intern
Library Assistant III
Planning Intern
Water Conservation Assistant
Assistant Pool Manager $22.14 $23.22 $24.30 $25.38 Part-Time Staff Assistant IV $26.73 $27.54 $28.35 $29.16 Part-Time Level II Police Officer
Library Coordinator
Pool Manager
Recreation Coordinator

Page 6 ends

Exhibit A

Page 651 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Attachment 2
RESOLUTION 23-XXXB

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES APPROVING AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 WHEREAS, the City of El Paso de Robles must annually approve an appropriation limit; and WHEREAS, the State of California has provided the necessary data for the City of El Paso de Robles to calculate its appropriation limit.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the following appropriation limitation for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024:

FY 2022-23 Appropriation
Limit $61,164,598
Change in Population -0.0102
Change in Income 0.0444
Total Change 0.0342
FY 2023-24 Appropriation
Limit $63,225,845
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles this 20th day of June, 2023 by the following roll call vote.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Steven W. Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk

Page 652 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Mid-Cycle Budget Update
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Attachment 3

Page 653 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Mid-Cycle Budget Update
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Budget Message......................................................................................................................................................... 1

FINANCIAL SUMMARIES AND FUND OVERVIEWS
General Fund ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Measure J-20 Supplemental Sales Tax Fund ..................................................................................................... 13 Information Technology Central Service Fund.................................................................................................. 14 Fleet Maintenance Central Service Fund .......................................................................................................... 15 Risk Management Central Service Fund............................................................................................................ 16 Downtown Parking Fund ................................................................................................................................... 17 Landscape and Lighting District Fund................................................................................................................ 18 Water Fund........................................................................................................................................................ 19 Wastewater Fund .............................................................................................................................................. 21 Airport Fund ...................................................................................................................................................... 23 Solid Waste Fund............................................................................................................................................... 24

AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
Summary of Positions by Department .............................................................................................................. 25

DEPARTMENT AND PROGRAM OVERVIEWS
City Manager’s Office/City Council.................................................................................................................... 26 Administrative Services..................................................................................................................................... 27 Police Services................................................................................................................................................... 29 Fire and Emergency Services............................................................................................................................. 31 Public Works...................................................................................................................................................... 32 Community Services .......................................................................................................................................... 34 Community Development ................................................................................................................................. 36 Utilities............................................................................................................................................................... 37 Attachment 3

Page 654 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
“The Pass of the Oaks”
1000 SPRING STREET • PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA 93446
June 20, 2023
Honorable Mayor and City Council,
I am pleased to present the mid-budget cycle update for your review and consideration. As part of the goal setting session in April 2022, the City Council directed staff to return to a two-year budget cycle beginning Fiscal Year 2022-23. The Operating and Capital Budgets for Fiscal Years 2022-23 and 2023-24 were approved by the City Council on June 21, 2022. This marks the midway point in our two-year budget cycle.

Although the budget is formally adopted at a point-in-time, it remains an evolving planning document that is amended throughout the year. Amendments are necessary to recognize changes to revenue streams, the regulatory environment, and the broader economic outlook. These factors are balanced against policy decisions made by City Council, shifting needs of departments to meet community needs, and unforeseen items that arise after the budget is adopted. This document provides a summary of proposed changes to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget as compared to the plan the City Council approved one year ago. Overall, the proposed changes are modest and reflective of a local economy that remains stable, but less growth-oriented than in recent years. Unanticipated events such as the winter rainstorms, and the ongoing reorganization of City departments have contributed to the need to make nominal adjustments at this juncture. Staff continue to recognize the need to maximize available taxpayer resources, while striving to provide the best customer service possible. The Fiscal Year 2023-24 proposed budget and recommended amendments aim to achieve this objective. As a result, this is not a full budget report but rather an update to the report approved by the City Council.

General Economic Outlook for Fiscal Year 2023-24
Notwithstanding broader concerns of an economic slowdown, the City remains on solid fiscal footing, with major general revenue sources meeting or exceeding projections. Inflation and the rising costs of borrowing has correlated with a reduction in local auto salestax revenue, although demand for real estate remains strong. Hospitality, leisure, and tourism-related industries remain relatively stable, with yearover-year sales growth in these areas. Development activity continues across all sectors, with new hotels, industrial and residential permitting remaining very strong. Major private development projects such as the Gateway, The Landing, and Paso Commons are hitting key milestones in the development process.

New projects such as the redevelopment of the Ennis Building by Barrelhouse Brewing have been announced. Infrastructure projects to support these and future developments are reflected in this capital improvement budget. Overall, the development outlook for Paso Robles remains bullish.

The local labor market remains very tight, with unemployment rates below the national average. The latest unemployment rate in the San Luis Obispo County was 3 percent as reported by the State. This is down from a revised 3.4 percent in March 2023, and above the year-ago estimate of 2.7 percent. This compares with an unadjusted unemployment rate of 4.3 percent for California and 3.1 percent for the nation during the same period.

Finally, the City has maintained its rainy-day fund above recommended levels set by the Government Finance Officers Association and is continuing to set aside funding into a Section 115 trust to buffer against future projected CalPERS employer cost increases. The City’s general obligation bond rating was

Page 1 ends

Page 655 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
reaffirmed at “AA” in spring 2023 and Fiscal Year 2022-23 marked the first time the City received the GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award.

Revenue Update
General Fund Update
At the time the budget was adopted, it was anticipated that General Fund revenues would total $54.3 million for the year. Updated revenue projections now predict General Fund revenues totaling $54.9 million, an increase of about $631,500, or an increase of 1.2%, when compared to the original estimates.

The variances of each revenue source are shown below:

Originally
Adopted
Mid-Year
Update Variance
Sales Tax $ 20,337,400 $ 20,410,200 $ 72,800
Property Tax 13,161,200 13,498,500 337,300
Transient Occupancy Tax 10,125,500 10,377,100 251,600
Other Taxes 4,213,800 4,233,500 19,700
All Other Revenue 6,421,500 6,371,600 (49,900)
Total $ 54,259,400 $ 54,890,900 $ 631,500
The majority of the adjustments related to property and transient occupancy tax (also known as TOT, or Hotel Tax). For property taxes, the City realized solid growth over the past couple of years (5% from FY 20-21 to FY 21-22, and another 6.4% is anticipated from FY 21-22 to FY 22-23), mainly due to sales of residential properties and property tax valuations being reset. This growth is more than what was originally anticipated, so the models now anticipate just under $13.5 million in property tax revenue for the upcoming fiscal year, an increase of approximately $337,000.

From a sales tax perspective, increased online sales from local big box retailer stock have attributed to an increase in revenues. This has counteracted a pattern of reduced sales activity for retail categories such as family apparel, auto sales, and winery purchases. Over the past year, there has been a notable shift in spending to travel, dining, leisure, and entertainment. That all being said, sales tax is anticipated to be relatively flat for the upcoming fiscal year. The good news is that we are not anticipating any backslide to pre-COVID revenue levels.

Moving forward, the forecasted revenue related to property tax remains positive due to the residential housing development occurring in the City. However, it should be noted that it generally takes a couple of years for the City to realize the full property tax generation when a development is occupied. For example, Arrive Paso, the 200-unit apartment complex on Creston Road, anticipates occupancy at the end of December this year. If that were to occur, the City could realize property tax revenue generation as early as FY 2024-25. But if the majority of occupancy doesn’t occur until 2024, those revenues won’t be seen by the City until FY 2025-26.

As previously mentioned, tourism activity in the City has been robust and appears positive moving forward. After realizing year over year loss in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City realized a 40% increase from FY 19-20 to FY 20-21, and another 37% from FY 20-21 to FY 21-22, where as previously, annual revenue growth was around 7% each year. As a result, growth at that pace was not sustainable, but revenues for FY 22-23 are projected to be $9.8 million, essentially the same as the previous fiscal year,

Page 2 ends

Page 656 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
but still significantly higher than it was prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Below is an accumulated month over month year over year analysis of the City’s TOT revenue.

Based on recent tourism data, occupancy rates (the percentage of hotel rooms occupied citywide) are falling back to historic norms, but the room rates (the actual cost of the room) have and continue to stay well above norms. Furthermore, the voters approved Measure F-22, increasing the transient occupancy tax from 10% to 11%. As a result, the model anticipates returning to historical year over year growth at about 7% over estimated FY 22-23 amounts.

Other Funds Revenue Adjustment
There are several additional funds with updates to the revenue estimate. The most significant adjustment is related to the City’s Recycled Water Distribution System. The City was recently awarded a low interest loan to construct this system and, in accordance with Government Accounting Standards, the City records proceeds from issuance of debt as income (and the repayment of debt as an expense). As a result, there is a $22.1 million revenue adjustment to the Sewer Fund revenue as well as a $10 million adjustment relating to grants that will be received for constructing the recycled water line. Likewise, there is also an increase in the Capital Improvement Budget to construct the line, so there is a corresponding increase in costs to account for this.

The City’s 24th Street Bridge project anticipated a $14 million grant award in FY 2023-24. The City was recently notified it did not get the award next year, so this grant has been postponed until future years when funding becomes available. Similar results occurred on one of the Airports CIP projects, where grant funds were not awarded and so the project is postponed until additional funding can be secured.

Lastly, the City had a sublease agreement with the “Sandbox”, the City’s economic meeting space hub.

The City was simply a pass-through agency of collecting rents from the current operator of the Sandbox and paying rents to the owner of the property. Negotiations directly between the landlord and the operator have been taking place over the past couple of months and beginning on July 1, 2023, the City has removed itself from this arrangement. As a result, both revenues (proceeds from the Sandbox) and expenses (lease payments to the landlord) will be removed. -
2 4
6 8
10 12

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
Millions
TOT Revenue History - Accumulated by Month
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Page 3 ends

Page 657 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Measure E-12 Sunset
Fiscal Year 2023-24 represents the last full fiscal year in which Measure E-12 is in place. The Measure generates over $6 million annually, of which 100 percent is invested locally. The half-cent supplemental sales tax provides most of the funding for local street repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation projects. By 2025, over $60 million in Measure E-12 will have been invested in local roadway repairs since the Measure was established in 2012. Nevertheless, the City continues to see cost increases, additional traffic volumes on local roadways and a high percentage of streets that need to be fully reconstructed. For Fiscal Year 2023-24, E-12 funds will be applied to several local road repair projects across the City, including Creston Road, Dallons Drive and neighborhood roads in west, southeast, central and northeast Paso Robles.

Absent the City Council placing the extension of the tax before the voters during the November 2024 general election, the Measure will sunset in early 2025. Without a locally controlled, reliable funding source, the street repair program will be significantly and negatively impacted beginning in 2025. If a measure is placed on the ballot and approved by voters, City staff is developing a new framework that is intended to repair more roadways more quickly, and implement a robust, comprehensive maintenance program to maximize life expectancy of local streets.

Employee Labor Contracts
On December 20, 2022, City Council approved Memorandums of Understanding with the Service Employees International Union, Paso Robles Police Association, and Paso Robles Professional Firefighters; Wage and Benefit Summaries with the Unrepresented Confidential, Professional, and Management Group, and Part-Time Employee Group, and an amendment to the City Manager Employment Agreement.

Wage increases vary by labor group and is based on a combination of a guaranteed amounts, plus additional amounts should the City’s revenues meet certain economic triggers. But because the budget was adopted prior to approval of the MOU’s, the economic factors in these agreements were not included in the adopted budget. The FY 2023-24 budget related to action totals $2.1 million, of which approximately $1.6 million impacting the General and Measure J-20 Funds (given that public safety increases more impactful to those funds).

California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS) The City is a member of CalPERS which provides defined pension benefits to City employees at retirement.

The system is heavily dependent not only on member and employee contributions, but also investment earnings on those contributions. When these assumptions are not made, an Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) is created, which is essentially the amount needed to fund past service credit earned. However, there are years where CalPERS may exceed its assumptions, thus lowering (or in some rare cases eliminating) the UAL. CalPERS assumes that the fund will earn 7% from its investments. In 2021 the system significantly exceeded the assumption and realized a 21.3% return, but it was followed in 2022 with a negative -7.5% return. This is not staggering given the volatility in the stock market in recent years. But it should also be noted that it takes a couple of years for these impacts to be realized by the City through its contributions. As an example, the required UAL payment for FY 2023-24 has actually decreased since the budget was adopted last year because the City is finally realizing the 21.3% gain from 2021. Overall, the 2021 gains actually decreased the City’s total UAL from $39.8 million to $23.5 million, and improved the City’s funding status to 86%. However, since we already known that 2022 assumptions have not been met, 2021 can be more viewed as an anomaly than a trend, and we can expect our contributions to increase

Page 4 ends

Page 658 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
more than anticipated in future years. The City has been proactive in addressing the City’s UAL and to minimize impacts to City contributions when CalPERS does not meet their assumed rate of return and/or changes their assumptions. In 2017, the City established a Section 115 Pension Trust Fund (on June 30, 2022, the Trust had a fair market value balance of $8.1 million) which is essentially a restricted savings account that can only be used towards pension contributions. The FY 2023-24 budget had assumed a $4.1 million contribution to CalPERS for its annual UAL payment, but given the 2021 returns, the required contribution is now $3.5 million, thus lowering the City’s required payment by $615,000. However, given what is known in 2022, and a 3.35% return anticipated in 2023 (which is still below assumptions), it is staff’s recommendation to redirect those dollars to the City’s Section 115 Trust Fund. It is likely the City will utilize the Trust fund in 2027 when the full impacts of the 2022 year are realized.

Recommended Personnel Changes
The originally adopted budget authorized 295.38 FTE positions for FY 2023-24, which is an additional 16.04 FTE from FY 2022-23. Nine of these new positions are located within the City’s public safety departments in the form of police officers and civilian staff to support additions. Other positions are due to the reorganization of the Public Works and Community Services Departments, as well as within the Community Development Department to prepare for the significant residential and commercial development on the immediate horizon. Finally, there are a small number of positions in the remainder of the departments that improve service levels, increase capacity or create efficiencies within the organization. However, since the budget was adopted, there are four recommended changes for the upcoming year:

Page 5 ends

Page 659 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

1. Reclassify the Fire Prevention Specialist I position to a Fire Prevention Specialist II: The Fire and Emergency Services currently staffs its Fire Prevention Bureau with a Fire Marshall, Administrative Captain, Fire Prevention Specialist II, and a Fire Prevention Specialist I. Staff recommends upgrading the one Fire Prevention Specialist I position to a Fire Prevention Specialist II position. The Fire Prevention Specialist II position performs the same duties as an entry-level Fire Prevention Specialist I, with additional experience, training, and education toward more complex systems. Large-scale commercial and residential development in the building process, and many more in the city's project pipeline, show a need for inspectors at the Fire Prevention Specialist II level. Currently, we utilize a contract to fill our experience and training gap. With the ability to have two Fire Prevention Specialist II’s, the department would rely less on the contract employee and will better serve our developers' needs by allowing for early morning, late afternoon, and concurrent level II inspections covered five days a week.

2. Reclassify one previously authorized Police Officer position to a Records Supervisor: The Police Department currently employs one Support Services Manager, who oversees the Records and Dispatch operations of the City. The City also employs a Dispatch Supervisor, but is solely dedicated to overseeing the day-to-day operations of the just the communications division; the City currently does not have a Records Supervisor. Previously, the City had one Records and Dispatch Supervisor, but the growth of the department created the need to reclassify that position to a Management position. The City has been recruiting for a new Support Services Manager for the past year, but to-date has been unsuccessful. Regardless, the long-term vision for the department would be symmetrical where there would be a supervisor over each division (both Records and Dispatch) with those supervisors reporting to the Support Services Manager. That being said, staff recommends reclassifying one of the authorized Police Officer positions to a Records Supervisor. This would decrease the authorized additional Police Officer positions in FY 2023-24 from seven to six (bringing to the total Police Officer positions funded with Measure J-20 from 21 to 20). The additional Police Officer position is still needed, but with the current challenges in recruiting for officers, it is not anticipated that this position would be filled in the year.

3. Consolidate two part-time Community Services Officers positions to one full-time position:

The Police Department currently employs two part-time Community Services Officer positions. One of the Community Services Officers is retiring from the City next year and the other is likely to enter the Police Academy in July. As such, the City has a unique opportunity to consolidate those two part-time positions into one full-time position. It is also envisioned that this consolidation will help rotate and cross-train additional staff on the downtown parking program.

4. Temporary Water Staff Assistants: The City’s Water Division is in need of some temporary work related to the City’s AMI (advanced metering infrastructure) and service line meter inventory. This change would bring on an additional four to five staff assistants for a 3-month period to inventory the type of materials going into and out of each water meter (as required by the State), as well as measure the water meter boxes in preparation for purchasing AMI compliant water meter lids.

Page 6 ends

Page 660 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
Organizational Restructure
As discussed throughout the budget preparation process, staff proposed a reorganization (hereinafter referred to as the “reorg”) impacting the City Manager’s Office, Administrative Services, Public Works, and Community Services Departments. The most significant portion of the reorganization separates the utilities functions of the City (i.e., sewer, refuse, water and utility billing) into a standalone Utilities Department and realigns specific functions under Public Works and Community Services Departments.

The reorganization added six total new positions to achieve the objectives outlined above.

The City has implemented a significant portion of the reorg, with only the Utility Billing division to be transferred to the new Utilities Department to occur (City staff is waiting for the construction of new office buildings at the Fire Station No. 3 location before moving over). However, the splitting of the landscaping crews (one to park and trail maintenance under Community Services and one to right-of-way maintenance under Public Works) has been more challenging than initially anticipated. Specifically, determining baseline budget amounts as some expenditures are staying within Community Services and some are moving to Public Works. That said, there is an increase of approximately $508,000 to Public Works operating expenses to account for this part of the reorg, and a corresponding decrease of $231,300 in Community Services, for a net increase of $276,700.

Community Events
There are three recommended changes to the City’s Community Events budget, two of which have already been approved by City Council, as follows:

1. On March 21, 2023, the City Council approved the July 4, 2023 Community Fireworks Celebration at Barney Schwartz Park. The total cost of the event is estimated to be $151,000, offset in part by sponsorship outreach program, with a minimum of $50,000 covered by Travel Paso.

2. On April 4, 2023, the City Council approved the Airport 50th Anniversary Celebration on September 23, 2023. The total cost of the event is $52,000, split equally between the General Fund and the Airport Fund.

The third change to the Community Events budget pertains to a “Light Up the Downtown” event this holiday season. Specifically, staff recommends an additional $90,000 appropriation to include a robust thematic lighting of the Carnegie Library as well as expanded lighting of City Park trees. This project seeks to substantially improve seasonal holiday lighting within downtown and City Park and create a unique and expanded holiday experience for the community.

Landscape and Lighting District
The Landscape and Lighting District was formed in 1989 for ongoing maintenance of streetlights, hardscapes, detention basins, parkways, median islands, open space, slopes, and other related appurtenant facilities. Each year, the City generates an Engineer’s Report, which is critical to estimating costs to maintain the District and is the basis for assessing properties within the District (each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements and expenses for which the parcel receives special benefit). The maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements associated with specific areas of the District that provide a special benefit to the properties within those areas are grouped into benefit zones that have historically been identified in this District as Sub-Areas. These Sub-Areas identify the properties within a particular commercial development or residential subdivision that benefit from improvements that were installed in connection with the development of those properties or directly benefit those properties. While many of the improvements maintained by the District provide special

Page 7 ends

Page 661 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
benefits to only the properties within a particular Sub-Area, some improvements installed as part of developing properties within one Sub-Area also provide a direct and special benefit to properties within nearby or adjacent Sub-Areas. In these cases, several Sub-Areas have been grouped into Zones based on these shared improvements and the cost of maintaining those shared improvements, are proportionately allocated to the properties within each of the individual benefiting Sub-Areas. However, not all Zones established within this District have improvements that are shared by each of the Sub-Areas within that Zone. Some of the District Zones represent geographical regions of the District, where the Sub-Areas may have similar improvements, but each Sub-Area is budgeted and assessed for only the improvements or that portion of an improvement that were installed and/or resulted from the development of the properties within that particular Sub-Area. In other words, the Landscape and Lighting District is quite complicated and accounting for costs by each Sub-Area level is challenging.

To help with this challenge, the City purchased a standalone database to account for all charges related to the Landscape and Lighting District; this database is an integral part of the Engineer’s Report but is separate and apart from the City’s Financial ERP system. Between 2019 and 2020, this database got corrupted and the reserve and expenditure amounts in the database are no longer accurate. Additionally, there is a “General Benefit” included in the Engineer’s Report to account for benefits of the Landscape and Lighting District to properties outside of District boundaries. Typically, this benefit has been charged by the General Fund by not charging associated overhead costs (e.g., Finance, Payroll, City Clerk) to the District. Unfortunately, since 2017 this accounting has not taken place.

City finance and public works staff have been working together over the past several months to transition the accounting and expenditure tracking within the City’s ERP system, and not the standalone database.

This will bridge any discrepancies between the Landscape and Lighting District and the Engineer’s Report sooner, as the City’s finances are audited each year. That all being said, in order to make the Landscape and Lighting District Fund whole, a one-time, $1.1 million transfer, from the General Fund to the Landscape and Lighting District Fund is needed (thisis not expending funds, but rather transferring monies from one fund to another). This would create a Landscape and Lighting reserve balance of $1.5 million.

Moving forward, the Landscape and Lighting District still faces fiscal challenges as the full costs to maintenance the District exceeds the assessments collected. As such, finance and public works staff will continue to evaluate the District, reduce costs as much as possible, properly account for and track the General Benefit within the District, and reduce the allocation of personnel being charged directly to the District from 1.6 FTE to 0.5 FTE.

Capital Improvement Program
The City completed two major road maintenance capital projects this past year: Dry Creek Road and the Rambouillet and Nicklaus Street neighborhood. Both projects came in under budget by approximately $1.5 million. These funds will go back to Measure E-12 fund reserves to be reprogrammed to another road maintenance project.

Additional CIP adjustments are as follows:

1. Creston Road: An additional $3 million is being added to the project to account for a State grant the City received from Senator Laird’s office.

2. 24th Street Bridge: Unfortunately, the City was not awarded a construction grant for this past grant cycle, so construction on the bridge will be delayed by at least one year. This reduced the project by $16 million, returning approximately $2 million of Transportation Impact Fees back to reserves

Page 8 ends

Page 662 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
(the remaining $14 million was anticipated to be funded by a federal grant). However, this is simply delayed, and appropriations will be reprogrammed once grant funding becomes available.

3. Huer Huero Creek Bridge: Preliminary strategy had anticipated that construction of this bridge would occur sometime in FY 2023-24. However, based on where the preliminary design is at today, construction will not occur until FY 2024-25, if not later. As such, the construction budget has been postponed to future years.

4. Railroad Crossing Water Line Replacements: The Water Master Plan calls for the replacement of water lines at the railroad crossings throughout the City. The budget already has appropriations for the design of the project and it is not anticipated to be completed until the end of the fiscal year. As such, appropriations for the construction phase have been pushed out by one year.

5. Water and Wastewater Line Replacements: The City’s road maintenance schedule calls for improvements to the segments at Sherwood, 17th Street, Sierra Bonita, and Sunset/Panoramaarea. However, prior to road construction, the water and wastewater line rehabilitation are necessary. These lines have been identified in the City’s Water and Wastewater Master plan, albeit ahead of schedule. As a result, additional appropriations are being made from Water and Wastewater reserves to cover the advanced work of the lines. It should be noted that if the City continues to be aggressive with road maintenance treatment, the enterprise funds will not be able to keep pace. As such, in the future, there is likely to be some interfund lending to occur as to be sure there are adequate fund reserves in the enterprise funds.

6. Recycled Water Line: The City was recently awarded a low-interest State Revolving Fund loan and a variety of grants pertaining to the City’s Recycled Water Distribution System. It was unknown what funding would be made available, so it was left out of the budget. But now that we have been awarded, the project budget is being updated accordingly.

7. Stormwater Basins: The adopted budget included six stormwater basin location in need of maintenance and rehabilitation for a total of $672,000. Design is currently underway, but preliminary engineer’s estimates indicate that the project is underfunded by $100,000.

8. Centennial Park Parking Lot Improvements: The originally adopted budget calls for the repavement of the parking lot at Centennial Park. After review of the condition, the lot will require a complete grind and overlay, and would also result in upgrading all curb ramps and sidewalks to ADA standards. This has added approximately $120,000 to the project.

There are two underfunded capital projects that are being deferred until either a funding solution becomes available, or determination of a permanent solution can be made. One of the capital projects is the stucco repair needed on the City Hall/Library building. An analysis of the stucco revealed that the entire stucco on the building is in need of replacement, and limiting the repairs to wear the cracks are visible will not remedy the issue. This is estimated to costs more than $225,000 (the original budget was for $65,000). The second project is related to the arbor and shade structure at Centennial Park. The project budget was approximately $40,000, with bid results coming in excess of $100,000.

Emergency Repairs in Response to the 2023 Storms
The City experienced two 100-year storms this winter. As a result, on January 12, 2023, the City Council declared a local state of emergency due to a severe storm even that resulted in sustained damage to

Page 9 ends

Page 663 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023
public and private infrastructure. The City is working with the California Office of Emergency Services and the Federal Emergency Management Agency in order to seek reimbursement for the damages caused by the storm. That being said, it is unknown how much each of these participating agencies will be contributing towards these damages, and as such, staff recommend appropriating from fund reserves to cover the cost of repair. Afterwards, should the City get reimbursement, those funds will be returned to fund reserves. Below are the location and budget pertaining to this event:

Damaged Facility General Water Wastewater
Sinkhole at Bolen Drive $ 300,000 $ - $ -
Larry Moore Park
Playground, Fence, Grading 30,700 - -
Riverwalk Trail Repair 31,000 - -
Police Shooting Range 20,500 - -
Fire Station No. 3 Sidewalk 18,200 - -
Dry Creek Trail 45,400 - -
Rambouillet/Snead Trail 14,600 - -
Water Treatment Plant and
Yard Rock Slope Protection - 168,000 -
Ronconi Well Repairs - 40,000 -
Wastewater Treatment
Plant Ponds - - 200,000
Total $ 460,400 $ 208,000 $ 200,000
Citywide Contingency
Beginning in the FY 2018-19 and 2019-20 Adopted Budget, the City included a “Citywide Contingency” line-item for $250,000, for the purpose of addressing unforeseen expenditures that arise throughout the fiscal year that wasn’t originally planned or expected. During the 2020-21 fiscal year, this amount was reduced to $125,000 to mitigate the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic but increased back to $250,000 during FY 2021-22. The FY 2022-23 and 2023-24 Adopted Budget erroneously left out this lineitem, so it is staff recommendation to reinstate this item.

Conclusion
Moving into Fiscal Year 2023-24, I remain optimistic about the trajectory of our organization and the vibrancy of our community. With a stable fiscal foundation, a strong vision set by the City Council, and the dedication of nearly 300 staff members, we are primed to see many achievements over the next 12 months. I greatly appreciate the leadership the City Council continues to provide, the input from the community, and the behind the scenes work of the City team to implement your direction.

In Partnership,
____________________
Ty Lewis, City Manager

Page 10 ends

Page 664 of 692 ends

City Council Agenda June 20, 2023

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

FUND OVERVIEW
General Fund
FY 2020‐21
Actual
FY 2021‐22
Actual
FY 2022‐23
Projected
FY 2023‐24
Adopted
FY 2023‐24
Updated

REVENUES
Taxes
## Sales and Use Tax $ 17,868,737 $ 20,398,804 $ 20,474,494 $ 20,337,400 $ 20,410,200 ## Property Taxes 11,723,491 12,317,408 13,109,794 13,161,200 13,498,500 ## Transient Occupancy Tax 7,132,691 9,803,368 9,684,219 10,125,500 10,377,100 ## All Other Taxes 4,928,369 5,125,133 4,406,823 4,213,800 4,233,500 Subtotal Taxes 41,653,288 47,644,713 47,675,330 47,837,900 48,519,300 ##Charges for Services 3,581,649 2,528,717 2,967,913 2,637,500 2,551,000 ## Licenses and Permits 561,801 786,474 1,104,064 800,000 850,000 ## Fines and Forfeitures 134,811 22,727 116,624 100,000 105,000 ## Intergovernmental Revenues 1,351,227 97,187 642,976 344,000 393,000 ##Use of Money and Property 2,932,242 737,707 1,560,934 1,505,000 1,539,000 ##Other Revenues 138,055 294,953 257,395 62,100 29,600 ## Interfund Transfers In 1,693,085 907,159 972,900 972,900 904,000 Total Revenues 52,046,158 53,019,637 55,298,136 54,259,400 54,890,900

EXPENDITURES
City Council/City Manager's Office
Personnel Services            1,022,041            1,062,765            1,323,004            1,368,800            1,459,400 Operating Expenses               772,111               913,118            1,294,601               933,500            1,220,100 Capital Outlay                        ‐                        ‐                 90,000                        ‐                        ‐ Transfers to Replacement Funds                    2,400                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐ Total City Manager's Office            1,796,552            1,975,883            2,707,605            2,302,300            2,679,500 Administrative Services
Personnel Services            1,880,565           1,256,094            1,369,809            1,464,800            1,524,000 Operating Expenses            2,951,962               934,509            1,074,587            1,053,000            1,089,000 Capital Outlay                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐                 30,000                 30,000 Transfers to Replacement Funds               112,500                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐ Total Administrative Services            4,945,027            2,190,603            2,444,396            2,547,800            2,643,000 Police
## Personnel Services            8,435,088            9,568,649          10,354,859          10,216,800          10,588,600 Operating Expenses            1,444,598            1,298,056            1,052,082            1,392,900            1,392,900 Capital Outlay                 24,800                        ‐                 16,364                        ‐                        ‐ Transfers to Replacement Funds               491,322                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐ Total Police          10,395,808          10,866,705          11,423,305          11,609,700          11,981,500 Fire and Emergency Services
## Personnel Services            6,903,397            7,066,867            6,176,837            6,766,700            7,198,900 Operating Expenses               687,063               350,169               642,106               631,400               631,400 Capital Outlay               164,687               143,662               237,000                    6,500                    6,500 Transfers to Replacement Funds               455,497                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐ Total Fire and Emergency Services 8,210,644                        7,560,698            7,055,943            7,404,600            7,836,800 Public Works
## Personnel Services            1,490,144            1,382,545            2,665,611            3,115,400            3,414,000 Operating Expenses            2,172,153            2,305,575            2,449,705            2,518,900            3,446,100 Debt Service               136,978               136,978               136,978               137,000               205,500 Capital Outlay                 30,358                        ‐               485,800                        ‐                    1,200 Transfers to Replacement Funds               204,855                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐ Total Public Works            4,034,488            3,825,098            5,738,094            5,771,300            7,066,800

Page 11 ends

Paso Robles City CouncilJune 20, 2023

Paso Robles City Council
June 20, 2023