Agenda packet — Paso Robles City Council, October 1, 2024 (part 7 of 8)

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
water quality?
Discussion: The site is an urban infill lot previously developed as a gas station. There are no water courses existing on the property. The project will be subject to stormwater management requirements both during construction and operation. Proposed uses include residential units, hotel units, and retail spaces. Commercial uses would be subject to the City’s Industrial Waste Permitting programs including the Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) Program and the Small Winery and Brewery Program, which regulate discharges from the project to enable the City to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit. The project will not have a significant negative impact on water quality or significantly increase industrial waste discharged to the City sewer.
b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
Discussion: The project site is within City limits and was previously developed as a gas station. The site is not suitable, nor is it currently used for groundwater recharge due to compacted soils.

The 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)6 states, “the City of Paso Robles has relied on groundwater, Salinas River water, and Nacimiento Water Project water for its municipal water supply”… “Recycled water is expected to be available within the next five years.” The UWMP plans for the water needs of the City through build out and accounts for residential and commercial uses allowed by zoning in the City including the subject site.

The Paso Robles Area Basin was identified by the California Department of Water Resources as a high priority groundwater basin subject to critical conditions of overdraft19. The City is a party to the Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin. The plan will bring the groundwater basin into sustainability and City water management includes planning for future development.

The City will have adequate water supply available to serve the site, and will not further deplete or significantly affect, change or increase water demands planned for use in the basin.

The impact of the project would be less than significant. c. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in a substantial erosion or siltation
on- or off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or offsite;
iii) create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
Exhibit A

Page 663 of 959 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project:
a. Physically divide an established
community?
Discussion: The project is an infill site in the historic downtown of Paso Robles, which is served by a gridded and well-connected street network. The project would not divide an established community. b. Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
Discussion: The property is in the T3-F zoning district, a mixed-use zone intended to “to preserve the existing character [of the neighborhood], while allowing for higher residential densities and a more diverse use mix than the T‐3N zone.”5
In the T3-F, residential uses are permitted, winetasting rooms are conditionally permitted, and hotels are not permitted. The applicant has requested the application of the Resort/Lodging overlay district to the site to allow development of a hotel. The purpose of the overlay is “ to provide a means through which the city council (and, through the development review process, the planning commission) can consider and selectively provide appropriate locations [for] resort hotels, motels, bed and breakfast inns, and Discussion: The site was previously developed with a gas station and is graded flat with no water features or drainage channels. The site is currently used as an impromptu parking lot; soils are compacted.

Development of the site will require the applicant to prepare and follow an erosion control plan and a stormwater management plan, which will prevent significant erosion and stormwater concentration from the site. The property and most of the west side of Paso Robles is in a 500-year flood plain, but the project is consistent with the style of development in the vicinity. The project would have a less than significant impact.
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
Discussion: The project site is in the 500-year floodplain as is most of the west side of Paso Robles. The site is about 70 feet above the Salinas River. The risk of flood is less than significant. e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan
Discussion: The 2011 Central Coast Basin Water Quality Control Plan adopted by the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board18 provides water quality regulations in the region through controls including waste discharge restrictions and stormwater management. Industrial waste discharges from the project will be managed through the City’s Industrial Waste program. The City’s Urban Water Master Plan6 is designed to serve all uses anticipated at full buildout. The City is a Groundwater Sustainability Agency for a portion of the Paso Robles Groundwater Subbasin. The commercial uses proposed by the project are consistent with the Paso Robles Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan21. The project does not conflict with the applicable water quality control plan not the sustainable groundwater management plan; impacts would be less than significant.
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Exhibit A

Page 664 of 959 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
similar forms of visitor-serving lodging (along with related accessory/ancillary land uses)” based on the “adequacy of streets and highways to handle the anticipated traffic, and compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses”. With application of the Resort/Lodging Overlay, the project will be consistent with land use plans of the City.

XII. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locallyimportant mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
Discussion (a-b): The only valuable mineral resources identified in the General Plan Conservation Element within City limit are aggregate, sand, and gravel sourced from the Salinas River and Huer Huero Creek. No mineral resources are known to occur on the site.

XIII. NOISE: Would the project result in:
a. Exposure of persons to or generation of
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
Discussion: Operation of the project is subject to the standards of the City Noise Ordinance, which limits sound received by nearby residential uses to 80 dB Lmax (highest measured sound level per hour) in the daytime and 70 dB Lmax at night. The project includes an outdoor courtyard and rooftop patio, which the applicant has described as intended for guests of the hotel. Residential uses to the west and east of the site are screened from noise generated in the courtyard by the towers of the building, however the rooftop patio is not screened to the same extent. The noise impact of the project would be less than significant with application of the following mitigation measures:

Mitigation Measure N-1: The outdoor courtyard and rooftop patio shall be open to tenants of the residential units and hotel units on the property only. Ongoing, amplified music and other nightclub activities shall be prohibited in the outdoor areas of the project unless a noise study is conducted and adequate mitigation is provided to preclude violations of the noise ordinance. b. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Discussion: Groundborne noise and vibration is expected only during construction of the project, however it will be short-lived and only during allowed construction hours (7am and 7pm, Monday-Saturday). The expected impact is less than significant.
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Exhibit A

Page 665 of 959 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
Discussion: The project site is not within the Airport Land Use Plan area. No significant noise impact from the airport is expected.

XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project:
a. Induce substantial population growth in an
area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Discussion (a-b): The project is on an infill site near the downtown of the City, where additional housing is encouraged and planned for. The site is currently vacant and the project will not displace existing housing.

The project will not have an unintended or negative impact to population or housing.

XV. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the project:
a. Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental
facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times, or other
performance objectives for any of the public
services?
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Discussion: Due to its relative small size and the nature of the project (mixed-use with residential, hotel, and retail uses), the project is not expected to significant increase demands on the fire and police departments. No significant increase in demand on schools, parks, and other public facilities is expected. The proposed project is subject to development impact fees and school fees, which address and pay for the incremental increase in demand on public services caused by the project.
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
Exhibit A

Page 666 of 959 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVI. RECREATION
a. Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Discussion (a-b): At one time, the applicant proposed a public park on the project site. This plan has been abandoned. The proposed project includes 8 residential units and 16 hotel units, which will generate an insignificant increase in demand on existing parks, especially the Downtown City Park. No new parks are proposed as a part of the project.

XVII. TRANSPORTATION: Would the project:
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
Discussion: The project is located in the downtown area of the City, which is served by a gridded circulation system. The project will include upgrades to the curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, street trees, and alley surrounding the project in conformance with adopted engineering standards for the downtown area. Transit routes travel north and south on Spring Street and the project will support transit ridership by locating additional residents, workers, and guests to the City near transit stops.

The project is expected to add 281 daily trips, 17 in the peak morning hour and 33 in the peak PM hour, which is a less than significant impact consistent with the City’s 2022 Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines.
b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Discussion: A transportation analysis was completed for the project (Attachment 4), which concluded the project will not have a negative impact on regional vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Utilizing the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) Travel Demand Model, the analysis indicates operation of the project reduces regional VMT from 8,991,742 to 8, 991,496, a net decrease of 246 VMT. c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Discussion: The project is located on a Spring Street, a straight road within a gridded circulation system.

Between 2018 and 2022, 4 traffic collisions were reported to the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the Spring Street/18th Street intersection. The area experiences a relatively significant amount □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Exhibit A

Page 667 of 959 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
of pedestrian traffic due to nearby businesses and the proximity of the Bauer-Speck Elementary school campus, which will be increased with the project. With the following mitigation measures applied, the project will not have a less than significant impact on transportation hazards:

Mitigation Measure T-1: The applicant shall install a bulb-out on the southwest corner of Spring Street and 18th Street.

Mitigation Measure T-2: The applicant shall remove and restrict parking on the southern side of 18th Street adjacent to the access alley.

Mitigation Measure T-3: The applicant shall replace the existing school warning sign.

Mitigation Measure T-4: The applicant shall install pedestrian warning signs on the southeast corner of Spring Street and 18th Street.
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Discussion: The project has been reviewed by the City’s Department of Emergency Services. The project will not impede emergency access, and is designed in compliance with all emergency access safety features and to City emergency access standards.

XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
a. Would the project cause a substantial
adverse change in the significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined in Public
Resources Code § 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of the size
and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or
object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical Resources,
or in a local register of historical resources
as defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
ii) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision
(c) of Public Resources Code § 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in subdivision
(c) of Public Resource Code § 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the significance
of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.

Discussion: The site is vacant, but was previously developed as a gas station constructed in the 1960’s with no undisturbed areas remaining. There are no historical resources or known tribal cultural resources on the site nor is construction likely to uncover resources due to the history of development and disturbance of the □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Exhibit A

Page 668 of 959 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
site. It is possible a historical or cultural resource may be uncovered during construction of the project. With the following mitigation measure, the impact of the project will be less than significant:

Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Should any cultural resources or human remains be identified on the site during construction, the applicant shall stop all work and retain a qualified professional to evaluate the resource and determine appropriate action.

XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project:
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
Discussion: The project will have an incremental but individually insignificant impact on listed utilities.

Local planning for sewer and water utilities has anticipated a buildout for Paso Robles that includes the potential for a mixed-use development on this site.
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
Discussion: The project site is within the City limits and it is zoned to allow for mixed -use development. Local planning for water supplies for buildout of the City include mixed-use development on the site. The proposed use is relatively modest in size, and will not be a substantial user of water.

The City’s municipal water supply is composed of groundwater from the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin, an allocation of the Salinas River underflow, and a surface water allocation from the Nacimiento Lake pipeline project. The 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)6 indicates there is adequate capacity to serve all households and commercial users at build out. Water use for this project has been accounted for and therefore impacts to groundwater supplies are less than significant. The applicant will be subject to water connection fees commensurate with the water demand of the project. The fees will account for the incremental increase in citywide water demand created by the project, so the impact will be less than significant c. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may
serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s
existing commitments?
Discussion: The project is not a significant water user or wastewater producer; no significant increase in wastewater production is expected. The City’s Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP)7 identifies system upgrades needed to accommodate buildout of the city. Development impact fees and sewer rates are adopted to address the proportionate share of impact of each development project on the sewer system. d. Generate solid waste in excess of state or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity
of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair
the attainment of solid waste reduction
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Exhibit A

Page 669 of 959 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
goals?
Discussion: The City’s Landfill Master Plan24 indicates the City’s landfill has adequate capacity for all projected waste generated within the city until at least 2051. Both construction and residential wastes are subject to diversion requirements for recyclable and compostable materials. The project will be required to provide storage for garbage, recycling, and green waste bins and will not impair the city’s ability to attain solid waste reduction goals.
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
Discussion: The proposed project will be required to comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations.

XX. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
Discussion: The project is located on an arterial street and will not impair emergency response or evacuation.

The General Plan Safety Element identifies the site as urbanized, indicating a low wildfire severity risk. The City’s Hazard Mitigation Plan notes there are no very high fire severity zones in the City, but the Salinas River is an area of high concern due to the large number of fires originating there. The project is about 2,000 feet from the Salinas River and will not block or impede access to the river nor to the very-high fire severity zones west of the City.
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Discussion: The project is located on a flat, urban infill site. It will not exacerbate wildfire risks. There is no anticipated impact.
c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power
lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the environment?
Discussion: No new wildfire related infrastructure will be installed or need maintenance as a result of the project, which is located on an infill lot near the downtown of the City. No impact is anticipated. d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Exhibit A

Page 670 of 959 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Discussion: The project is located on a flat and stable site. Standard erosion control and stormwater management requirements will prevent the project from creating significant runoff. A soils report will be required before a grading permit is issued for the project to address any limitations of the existing soil on the site, which is not is not located in an area with high risk of landslide. No significant impact is anticipated.

XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
Discussion: The project is located on an infill site. The project would continue the development pattern established on adjacent properties to the north and south. The site is fully disturbed and does not include habitat or contribute to a migration corridor. The site does not contain significant historical resources or known tribal resources. No impact is anticipated.
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)?
Discussion: The project is located within the City’s limits, on a vacant but previously disturbed site where development has the least potential for significant impacts to the environment. The project will not induce additional development or future projects that would have a significant impact on the environment. c. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
Discussion: As mitigated, the project will not have environmental impacts that will cause a substantial adverse impact on human beings. The project is in keeping with both the existing and planned character of the neighborhood in which it is located
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Exhibit A

Page 671 of 959 ends

FOOTNOTES / EARLIER ANALYSIS AND BACKGROUND MATERIALS.

Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D).

Documents utilized in this analysis and background / explanatory materials:

Reference
#
Document Title Available for Review at:
1 City of Paso Robles General Plan City of Paso Robles Community Development Department
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA 93446
https://www.prcity.com/313/General-Plan
2 City of Paso Robles Environmental Impact Report
for General Plan Update
City of Paso Robles
3 2007 Airport Land Use Plan https://www.prcity.com/354/Airport-LandUse-Plan 4 City of Paso Robles Municipal Code https://library.municode.com/ca/el_paso_de_r obles/codes/code_of_ordinances
5 City of Paso Roble Uptown/Town Centre Specific
Plan
https://www.prcity.com/362/Uptown-TownCentre-Specific-Plan 6 City of Paso Robles Urban Water Management Plan
2020
https://www.prcity.com/DocumentCenter/Vie
w/32094/Paso-Robles-2020-UWMP-andWSCP-PDF
7 City of Paso Robles Sewer System Management Plan https://www.prcity.com/DocumentCenter/Vie w/15356/Sewer-System-Management-PlanPDF?bidId=
8 City of Paso Robles Standard Conditions of
Approval for New Development
City of Paso Robles
9 City of Paso Robles Gateway Plan: Design
Standards, 2008
https://www.prcity.com/DocumentCenter/Vie
w/14730/Gateway-Plan-Design-StandardsPDF?bidId=
10 City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan https://www.prcity.com/DocumentCenter/Vie w/14729/Climate-Action-Plan-PDF
11 San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control
District CEQA Handbook 2023 GHG Guidance
https://storage.googleapis.com/slocleanairorg/images/cms/upload/files/2023UpdatedSL OCountyAPCDCEQAGHG_Guidance%26Thresholds-FINALStandAloneVersion.pdf Exhibit A

Page 672 of 959 ends

12 San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control
District Clean Air Plan
https://www.slocleanair.org/rulesregulations/clean-air-plan.php 13 USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Soil Survey of San Luis Obispo County,
Paso Robles Area, 1983
https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebS
oilSurvey.aspx
14 Regional Transportation Plan,
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, 2019 https://slocog.org/2019RTP 15 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
California Resources Agency
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp
16 Siting, Design, Operation and Maintenance of Onsite
Wastewater Treatments Systems (OWTS) Policy
California Water Boards
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/
programs/owts/
17 Underground Storage Tank Program
California Water Boards
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/
programs/ust/
18 Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coast
Basin
Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralcoast/p
ublications_forms/publications/basin_plan/#:~
:text=The%20Water%20Quality%20Control%
20Plan,including%20surface%20waters%20an
d%20groundwater.
19 Post-Construction Stormwater Management
Requirements for Development Projects in the
Central Coast
Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralcoast/
water_issues/programs/stormwater/docs/lid/lid
_hydromod_charette_index.html
20 Cortese List
California Department of Toxic Substance Control
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map
/
21 Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Management Plan
City of Paso Robles
https://www.prcity.com/DocumentCenter/Vie
w/15348/Groundwater-Basin-ManagementPlan-PDF?bidId=
22 Purple Belt Plan
City of Paso Robles
https://www.prcity.com/DocumentCenter/Vie
w/31945/Purple-Belt-Plan-PDF
23 Busch, Lawrence L. and Miller, Russell V. 2011.

Updated Mineral Land Classification Map for the
Concrete-Grade Aggregates in the San Luis ObispoSanta Barbara Production-Consumption Region, California – North Half.

Copy on file with the City of Paso Robles
24 Master Plan of Sustainable Opportunities at the Paso Robles Landfill
https://www.prcity.com/DocumentCenter/Vie
w/15350/Landfill-Master-Plan-PDF?bidId=
25 Parking Lot Lighting with Improved Uniformity
LRC at Rensselaer
https://www.lrc.rpi.edu/programs/solidstate/pa
rkingLotUniformity.asp
Exhibit A

Page 673 of 959 ends

Attachments:

1. Vicinity Map

2. Project Plans

3. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Report for the Tobin James Mixed Use Project

4. Transportation Analysis for 1745 Spring Street, Paso Robles

5. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Exhibit A

Page 674 of 959 ends

Attachment 1
Vicinity Map
a
~ --- . - . ·7-~~~...,:1~ ..... - ---
tdl
r ~-;. •· ~~ • •
• " <
..•• . .
i,_.._~t,..
:..a.: '
. TS
.·L111
..,. --~~
I ~ i.,Jii;d'I~ •
·- i~ ~ ., ,
.f";I ~··.'t _.._... .., , --/1 ..,____
Exhibit A

Page 675 of 959 ends

Development Pl an & Conditional Use Permit Drawings For PRIN
1745 Spring Street,
Symbols Legend

GRID LINE REFERENCE
(t_(------GRID LINETO CENTER OF WALL Qrns "(�)< GRIO NUMBER OR LETTER

GRID LINE TO EDGE

OF CONCRETE AND STEEL
DETAR_REFERENCE

DETAIL NUMBER
-----SHEET ONWl-ia--JDETAIL

IS DRAWN
BUILDING SECTlON REFERENCE

SECTION NUMBER
---- SHEET ON WHCH SECTION

IS DRAWN

WALL SEGTIONDETAL
------ DETAIL NUMBER

REVISION REFERENCE

ELEVATION DETAIL
A
o��

SHEET ONW'HICH
DETAIL IS DRAl/vll

REVISION REFERENCE NUMBER

INTERIOR

ELEVATION NUMBER
Deferred Submittals / Separate Permits
1 A SEPARATE ENCROACHMENT PER.MIT IS REOURED FOR ANY WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGl-fT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN QTY EASEMENTS FOR GONNECTlONS TO PI.JBLIC UTLITIES. WORK REQUIRING AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT

INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO DEMOLITIONS, UTILITIES, WATER, SEWER, FIRE SERVICE LATERALS, UJRB, GUillR, AND SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY /\PP ROACHES, SIDEWALK UNDER-DRAINS, STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS,

STREET TREE PLANTING OR PRUNING, CURB RAMPS, STREET PAVING, AND PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION OR CONSTRUCTION STAGING IN lliE RIGHT-CF-WAY
Plumbing Fixture and Fittings Schedule

RXTURE TYPE MAX FLOW RATE NOTES
Sl-(JWERHEAIJS 2GPM@BOPSI
LAVATORY FAL.UTS 1.2GPM@60PSI LAVATORY FAUCETS SHALL NOT HAVE A FLOW RATE LESS THAN 0.8 GPM AT 20 PSI
KITCHEN F/IJJCETS 1.BGPM@60 PSI
TANK-TYPE WATER CLOSETS 1.28 GAL10NS/FWSH SINGLE+ DUAL FLUSH WATER CLOSETS Willi EFFECTM.

FLUSH OF 1.28 G OR LESS
PLUMBING FIXTURE AND RTTINGS NOTES: PLUMBING RXTURES AND FITTlNG.5 SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS .AJIJD LJMITS FOR INDOOR WATER USE IN CAI.GREEN 4.303.1
t\pplicable Governing Codes:
2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, VOLUMES 1+2 (BASED ON 2018 IBCj 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE (2017 NEG)
201 g CALIFORNIA MECH/\NICAL COOE (2018 UMC"j
2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (2015 UPG)
2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE
CALIFORNIA FIRE COOE (2015 IFC')

CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE

CITY OF PASO ROBLES MUNICIPAL GODE
CALIFORNIA GOVERMENT CODE SECTIONS 65915-65918
Paso Robles, California 93446
Calgreen Mandatory Measures

1. PRW:CTS WHICH DISTURB LESS TI,AN ONE ACRE OF SOIL SHALL MANAGE STORMWATER DURING CONSTRUCTlON. WHERE STORM WATER IS CONVEYED TO A PUBLIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM, COLLECTION POINT,

GUTTER OR SIMILAR DISPOSAL METHOD, WATER SHALL BE FILTERED BY USE OF A BARRIER SYSTEM, WATTLE OR OTHER METI-WD APPROVED BY THE ENFORCING AGENCY, CAI.GREEN 4,106,2,2

2. WATER CONSERVING PLUMBING RXTURES AND FITTING.5 SHALl BE INSTALLED AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PLUMBING FIXTURE AND FITTINGS SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET. CALGREEN 4.303.3.1

3. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTROLLERS FOR LANDSCAPING PROVIDED BY THE BULDER AND IN.STALLED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION SHALL COMPLY Willi TI-IE FOLiOWING:
1 - CONTROl.l..ERS SHPJ...L BE WEATI,ER- 00 SOIL MOISTURE-BASED CONTROLLERS THAT AUTOMATICALLY ADJJST IRPJGATION IN RESPONSE TO CHANGES IN PLANT WATEPJNG NEEDS /lS WEAlliER OR SOIL CONDITIONS CHANGE
2 - WEATHER-BASED CONTROl.l..ERS WITHOIJT INTEGRAL RAIN SENSORS OR COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS THAT ACCOUNT FOR RAINFPJ...L SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE WIRED OR WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR WHICH CONNECTS OR COMMUNICATES WITT-, THE CONTROLLER(S). CAL.GREEN 4.304.1

4. ANNULAR SPACES AROUND PIPES, ELECTRIC CABLES, CONIJJITS, OR OTHER OPENINGS IN SOLE/BOTTOM PLATES AT EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE QOSED WlTH CEMENT MORTAR, CONCRETE Mi\SONRY OR A SIMILAR METHOD ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENFORCING AGENCY TO PREVENT PASSAGE OF RODENTS. CAI.GREEN 4.406.1

5. RECYCLE AND/OR SALVAGE FOR REUSE A MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE NONHAZARDOUS CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOI..ITlON WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EITHER SECTK)N 4.408.2, 4.408.3 OR 4.408.4: OR MEET A MORE STRINGENT LOCAL CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT ORDIN.AJIJCE. CALGREEN 4.408.1

6. [MJCT OPENINGS AND OTHER RELATED AIR DISTRIBUTlON COMPONENT OPENINGS SHALl BE COVERED DURING CONSTRUCTlON PER CAL.GREEN 4.504.1.

7. ADHESIVES, SEALANTS AND CAULKS SHALL BE COMPLIANT WITH VOC AND OTHER TOXIC COMPOUND LIMITS PER CALGREEN4.504.2.1

8. PAINTS, STAINS AND OTHER COATINGS SHALL BE COMPLIANT WITH voe LIMITS PER CAL.GREEN 4.504.2.2.

9. AEROSOL PAINTS AND GOATING.5 SHALL BE COMPLIANT WITH PROIXJCT WEIGHTED MIR LJMfTS FOR AOC AND OTHER TOXIC COMPOUNDS PER CALGREEN 4.5042,3

10. DOOJMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO VEPJFY THAT COMPLIANT VOC LJMIT RNISH MATERIALS HAVE BEEN USED PER CALGREEN 4.504.2.4

11. CARPET AND CARPET SYSTEMS SHALL BE COMPLIANT WITH voe LIMITS PER CAL.GREEN 4.504.3.

12. EK3HTY (80) PERCENT OF FLOOR AREA RECEIVING RESILIENT FLOORING SHALL COMPLYWfTH THE voe EMISSION LIMITS DEFINED IN THE COLLABORATIVE FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE sa--lOOLS (CHPS) LOW-EMITTlNG MATERIALS

LIST OR BE CERTIFIED UNDER HE RESILIENT FLOOR COVERINGINSTTTUTE (RFCI) FLOORSCORE PROGRAM PER CALGREEN 4.504.4.

13. PARTICl..fBOARD, MEDIUM FIBERBOARD (MDF) AND HARDWOOD PLYINOOD USED IN INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR FINISH SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH LOW FORMALDEHYDE EMISSION STANDAADS PER CAL.GREEN 4.504.5.

14. VAPOR RETARDER AND GI\PLLARY BREAK OF 4" THICK BASE OF½" OR LAAGER CLEAN AGGPJ:GATE SHAil.. BE INSTAUED AT SI.AB ON GRADE FOUNDATIONS PER CAL.GREEN 4,505.2.

15. MOISTURE CONTENT OF BUILDING MATERIALS USED IN WALL AND FLOOR FRAMING SHALL BE CHECKED BEFORE ENCLOSURE PER CALGREEN 4.505.3

16. BATI-IROOM EXHAUST FANS SHALL BE DIETED TO TERMINATE OUTSIDE .AJIJD BE PROVIDED IN EVERY BATHROOM PER CALGREEN4.506.1.

17. WHOLE HOUSE EXt-WJST FANS SHALl HAVE INSULATED LOI.NE.RS OR COVERS WHICH CLOSE WHEN THE FAN IS OFF. COVERS OR LOI.MRS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM INSL.lATION VALUE OF R-4.2 PER CAL.GREEN 4.507.1.

18. PER CALGREEN 4.507.2 DUCT SYSTEMS ARE SIZED, DESIGNED, ANO EQUIPMENT LS SELECTED USING THE

FOLLOWING METI-IODS

1. ESTABLISH HEAT LOSS AND HEAT GAINVALL£S ACCORDING TO ACCA (MANLW.. J) OR EQUWALENT

2. SIZE DUCT SYSTEMS ACCORDING TO ACr.A 26-0 (MANLW.. D) OR EOOIVALENT.

3. SELECT HEAllNG ANO COOLING EQUIPMENT ACCORDING TO ACCA 36-S (MAMJAL S) OR EQIJWALENT.

19. OPERATKJN + MAINTENANCE MANUAL TO BE SLffilED AT FINAL INSPECTKJN

20. MANAGE STORMWATER PER CALGREEN COOE REQUIREMENTS. 4106.2 Parking Analysis
VEHICLE PARKING REQUIRED (PER T-3F ZONE DISTRICT & GAI..FORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65915 65918 •) COMMERCIAL/ RETAIL: 3,346 SF@ 1SP/400 SF
RESIDENTIAL: 8 X 1-BEDFtOOM UNITS@ 1 SPACE/ UNIT
HOTEL ROOMS: 1 SPACE/ROOM X 16 ROOMS+ 1 SP /EMPLOYEE/SHIFT = 8.37 SPACES
= 8.00 SPACES
= 18.00 SPACES
SUB-TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: = 34.37 SPACES
PARKING REDUCTION: 66% OF REOORED COMMERCIAL SPACES MAY BE USED FOR RESIDENTW... USES, f,S FOLLOWS:
26 COM MERICAL SPACES X 66% REDUCTION = 17.33 SPACE RmJCTION AVM..ABLE ACML MAXIMUM REDUCTION AL.LOWED =< 8.00> SPACES
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED:

PARKING PROVIDED

STANDARD SPACES

CARPORT SPACES
ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACE (9'x18' + 8' VAN OFFLOAD AREA)
ADDITIONAL 2 SPACES FOR PROVIDING 10 BICYCl..f SPACES
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED:
• PlRSLWITT0TABLEH5-6SUl3.CflfECITY'SHOJSINGELEMENT
= 26.37 SPACES REQUIRED
e 8SPACES
= 12 SPACES
e 1 SPACE
e 2SPACES*
= 23 SPACES PROVIDED ••
-AOOIIDNAI..PAAl(JNG f!EID:IDNP\JlSUI\NTTOCALFORNIAGOVERNMENTaff&:CTIONS65915 -65918 Occupancy Loading Calculation
OCCUPANT LOADING SHALL BE BASED ON TABLE 1004.1.2. OF THE CBC.

COMMERCIAL/RETAIL M
RESIDENTIAL R-3
HOTEL R-3
3,346 SQ.FT 60 SF/ □Ca.FANT 56 OCCUPANTS
4,488 SQ. FT 200 SF/ OCCUPANT 23 OCCUPANTS
11,252 SQ. FT 200 SF I OCaJPANT 57 OCCUPANTS
TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD 136 OCCUPANTS
Project Data
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

APPLICANT:

SITE/ZONING INFORMATION:

JURISDICTION
STREET AOORESS:

A.P.N:

ZONING:

DENSITY:

LOT SIZE:

CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW MIXED USE PRO..EGT CONSISTING OF GRCXJND

FLOOR COMMERCIAL LEASE SPACE INCLUDING A WINE TASTING ROOM, A 16-ROOM BOIJTIQIJE HOTEL, AND (8) ONE-BEDROOM RESIDENTIAL. UNITS CONSISTING OF A MIX OF MARKET-RATE AND AFFORDABLE RATE UNITS.

TOBIN JAMES
5033 VINEYAAD DRIVE, PASO ROBLES, r.A 93446

CITY OF PASO ROBLES
1745 SPRING STREET, PASO ROBLES, CAI.JFORNIA 93446
008-283-012
T-3F FLEX ZONE
8-12 UNfTS/ACRE
21,000 S.F

SETBACKS

PRIMARY STREET

SIDE STREET

SIDE YARD

REQUIRED
15'

PROPOSED
15'
12' 12'
8' 8'
REAR YARD 10' 10'

PROPOSED BUILDING AREA NAME UNITTYPE
COMMERCIAL/RETAIL C1 LEASE SPACE
COMMERCIAL/FtETAIL C2 LEASE SPACE
HOTEL H1-H16 HOTEL ROOMS
RESIDENTIAL R1 1-BEDR.OOM
RESIDENTIAL R2 1-BEDR.OOM
RESIDENTIAL R3 1-BEDROOM
RESIDENTIAL R4 1-BEDR.OOM
RESIDENTIAL RS 1-BEDR.OOM
RESIDENTIAL R6 1-BEDR.OOM
RESIDENTIAL R7 1-BEDROOM
RESIDENTIAL RB 1-BEDR.OOM
r.ARPORT PARKING CARPORT PARKING
STORAGE/ HOIBEKEEPING S1-S8 RES STORAGE/ HOUSEKEEPING
CIRCULATION 2ND & 3RD FLA WAL'r<YIAYS
TOTAL PROJECT BUILDING AREA:

COVERAGE:

LOT COVERAGE:

FLOOR-AREA-RATIO (FAR):

MINIMUM SITE LANDSCAPING:

BUH...DING INFORMATION

NUMBER OF STORIES

OCCU'ANCYGROUP
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:

SPRINKLERED:

PROPOSED
10,921 SQ. FT,(49%)

0.49 10%
3+ROOFDECK

COMMERCIAL/ RETAIL/ RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL = TYPE V-B
YES

SIZE/AREA
2,011 SF
1,335 SF
11,252 SF
558 SF
558 SF
558 SF
555 SF
554 SF
553 SF
576 SF
576 SF
2,925 SF
791 SF
2,034 SF
24,836 SF
HEIGHT:

BULDINGAIEA'i:
36' ALLOWED (N.I.C. ARCH TOWER/ MECHANICAL APPLfflANCENS) 35'-6' PROPOSED (39' TO MECH SCREEN; 46'-2' TO ELEV TOWER)

SEE TABLE ABOVE

UTILITY INFORMATION
ELECTRICITY:

NATURAL GAS:

WATER
SE'NER:

TELEPHONE:

PLANNING ENTITLEMENTS:

PACIFIC G/\S & ELECTRIC

THE GAS COMPANY

CITY OF PASO ROBLES

CITY OF PASO ROBLES
AT&T

CUP REQUIRED FOR WINE-TASTING ROOM
Project Directory

OWNER TOBIN JAMES MECHANICAL IBO
5033 VINEYARD DRIVE
Pt,SO ROBLES,CA93446
PH:805.674.0791
CONTACT: TOBIN .IAMES
ARCHITECT GARCIA ARCHITECTUiE + DESIGN PLUMBING IBO
1308 MONTEREY STREET, filTE 230
SAN LUIS OBISPO, r.A 93401
PH: 805.783.1880
CONTACT: GEORGE F. GARCIA, AIA
STRUCTURAL TB□

CML IBO
IBO

ELECTRICAL IBO
LANDSCAPE TB□
SOILS TB□
Project Notes

1. All WORK SHALl BE IN CONFORMANCE WlTH lliE 2019 EDITIONS OF THE C'AIJFORNIABUILDING COOES BASED ON THE 2018 IBC, 2018 UMC & 2018 UPC & THE 2019 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE BASED ON THE 2018 NEC, TI,E 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (N3 AMENDED BY THE STATE OF CAIJFORNIAAND THE LOCAL JURISDICTION) .AJIJD THE 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS COOE. 2 ANY/ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER PRIOR TO SU3MISSION TO THE fl.llLDING DEPARTMENT FOR REVEW AND APPROVAL.
3 All WORK LOCATED WITHIN THE PLOOC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN THE J.JRISIJIGTION OF THE UTI..ITES AND

PUBLJC WORKS DEPARTMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND STANDARD SPECIFICATION. THE CURRENT PDOPTED STANDARDS ARE DATED JANUARY 2016. 4 A SEPARATE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK IN THE PLBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN CITY EASEMENTS FOR CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC UTILITIES. WORK REQUIRING AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT

INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO DEMOLITIONS, IJTILITTES, WATER, SEWER, AND FIRE SERVICE LATERALS, CURB, GUTTER, .AJIJD SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY APPROACHES, SIDEWALK LINDERDRAINS, STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS,

STREET TREE PLANTING OR PRUNING, CURB RAMPS, STREET PAVING, AND PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION OR CONSTRUCTION STAGING IN lliE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
5 THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLJC WORKS DIRECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS .AJIJD/OR OCCUPANCY OF Nff BUILDING. 6 Nff SECTIONS OF DAMAGED OR DISPLACED CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK OR DRIVEWAY APPROACH SHALl BE

REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 7 CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION HOTLINE WITH AT LWT A48 HOUR NOTICE FOROOREClUIRED ENCROACHMENT PERMIT INSPECTION OR FINAL INSPECTION.
8 A TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ISSU.AJIJCE 9 THE ADJOINING STREET SHAI...L BE CLEANED BY SWEEPING TO REMOVE DIRT, DUST, MLD AND CON.STRUCTION DEBRIS AT THE END OF EACH DAY.
10 EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED DURING ALL CONSTRUCTION AND

GROUND DISTURBING AGTMTES PER THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH
11 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHAl..l BE REMOVED WHEN PERM.AJIJENT IMPROVEMENTS, PLANTINGS AND FACILITIES ARE IN PLACE. TEMPORARY MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO RNAL

INSPECTION APPROVALS
12 THE EXISTING SEWER LATERAL SHALL BE TELEVISED AND APPROVED FOR REUSE OR SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED. THE INSPECTION SHALL BE SUBMIITTD Willi THE BUILDING PERMIT .APPLJCATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTtE IJTLITTES DEPAATMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. 13 All DISTIJRBED SURFACES SLOPED FOUR HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL AND GREATER AND AREAS USED TO CON\IEY CONCENTRATED DRAINAGE SHALl BE PREPARED AND MAINTAINED TO CONTROL EROSION BY EFFECTM Pl.ANTING TO BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS PRIOR TO A REOO:ST FOR FINAL INSPECTION APPROVPJ.... 14 PRIOR TO 00 DEMOLITION OR GRADING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT AfN TREES ADJACENT TO THE

WORK ZONE
15 THE MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF CALGREEN CI-W'TER 4 SHALL BE APPi.JED TO ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS OF

EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WHERE THE ADDITION OR ALTERATION INCREASES THE BUILDING'S CONDITIONED AREA, VOWME, OR SIZE. THE REQI.JREMENTS SIW.L APPLY ONLY TO .AJIJD/OR Willi IN THE SPECIFIC AREA OF THE ADDITION OR ALTERATION. CALGREEN 301.1.1 16 OWNER SHALL PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF PROPERTY CORNERS TO THE SATISFACTkJN OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR AT THE TIME OF FOUNDATION INSPECTION.
17 A LICENSED SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER SHALL VERIFY PAD ELEVATIONS, RNISH FLOOR ELEVATION, AND SETBACKS

PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION, AND ROOF ELEVATIONS, PRIOR TO ROOF SHEETING INSPECTION, SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION AND OBTAIN APPROVAL PRIOR TO SUBMITTING REQUEST FOR INSPECTION. 18 PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDLlE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WlTH ALL PARTIES INVOLVED AT THE PROJECT SITE TO REVIEW lliE SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS, PROCEDURES, AND INDMDUAL SPECIAL it,5PECTORS THAT WILL BE /lSSIGNED TO THE PROJECT, f,S WELL PS REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL OB.5ERVATION. CONTRACTOR SHAI...L CONTACT THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH fl.llLDING DIVISION TO CONFIRM AN ACCEPTABLE MEETING DATE .AJIJD TIME. 19 AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE WORK INCLUDED IN THE PERMIT, THE STRIXTURAL OBSERVER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE BULDING OFFICIAL A STATEMENT THAT THE SITE VISITS HAVE BEEN MADE+ UENTFY ANY REPORTED DEFICIENCIES THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE STRUClURAI... OBSERVER'S KNOWLEDGE, HAVE NOT BEEN RESOLVED.

Vicinity Map
Drawing Log

DESCRIPTION
100% CONCEPTUAL/CLIENT REVIEW SET
1ST PLANNING ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL

OWNER PLAN REVISIONS/ REVIEW SET
OWNER PLAN REVISION.S / REVIEW SET

OWNER DESIGN REVISIONS/REVIEW SET
2ND PLANNING ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET
3RD PLANNING ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET

ISSUE DATE
22,0418

22.0504
22,0906

22.0923

22.1103
22,1118

23.0407
4TH PLANNING ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET 23,0811
5TH PLANNING ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET/ ENGINEERING REVISIONS 23.0908 +

REVISION
OPTION B.4
Sheet Index
Sill
T1.1
t,S1.1
L1.1
C1.1
A1.1
A1.2
A1.3
A1.4
A1.5
A2.1
A2.2
A2.3
A2.4
A3.1
A3.2
A4.1

DESCRIPTION
TITlE SHEET/ SHEET INDEX/ PROJECT DATA/ GENERAL NOTES

SITE PLAN/ UTILITY PLAN

LANDSCAPE PLAN
PRELJMINflRY GFIMJING & DRAINAGE PLAN

RRST FLOOR PLAN
SECOMJ FLOOR Pl.AN

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN

BUILDING SECTION

EXTERIOR RENDERINGS

EXTERIOR RENDERINGS
EXTERIOR PJ:NDERINGS

EXTERIOR RENDERINGS

ELEVATIONS

AERIAL RENDERING
Affordable Housing Density Analysis
PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65915 65918 ALLOWED DENSITY PER T-3F ZONING 6-12 UNITS/ ACRE
EXISTING PARCEL SIZE 21,000 SF/ 0.4821 AG
BASED DENSITY UNITS ALLOWED: 12 UNITS X 0.4821 AC= 5.78 UNITS ('ROUNDS TO) 6 DENSITY UNITS (DU'S) AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS CALGl..lATION
BA.SEO DENSITY AL.LOWED PER T-3F ZONING

PROPOSED AFFORDABLE UNITS
% OF AFFORDABILJTY: 1 DU /6 DlJ = 16.67% AFFORDABLE (ROUNDS TO,,.) APPLY 50% DENSITY BONUS FOR (MIN) 15% AFFORDABILJTY@VERY LOW LEVEL TOTAL ALiOWED DEN-5ITY: 6 BASE DU'S+ 3 DENSITY BONUS DU'S • DEVELOPER INCENTIVES/ CONCESSIONS
AI..LOWED DEVELOPER INCENTIVES FOR (MIN) 15% AFFORDABILITY@VERY LOW

PROPOSED PROJECT INCENTIVES/ EXCEPTIONS
6DENSITY UNITS
1 DENSITYUNIT
17% AFFORDABIUTY
3AIJDITIONALDU'S•
9 DENSITY UNITS
3INCENTIVES
(1)HEIGHTEXCEPTION
(2) PARKING REDOCTION
(3)T.B.D.

El
II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05.783.1B80
fx: 805.783.1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Title Sheet
Project Data
General Notes
revision:
""descriptioo issuedateby
'
legal stuff:

Th1useofth1sepla1"1Sand speclflcatlonssha!
be restricted to the use oltheDn!Jiria l s�efor
which lheywereprepared&ndpublic&tion thereof
isexpressly lim itadtosuch uHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhila rt:hilect. n1eto th11seplans
and .,p11<:ifi<:ation,, ,..,main,.with i;iarc;a archi!io<:tl.n +d!lsignwilhoutprejudicft. Visua lconta ctwith
theseplans and specificationssha llconslllul&
p�mefaceevlder.ceoftheeccept!lnceofthese
ri,slriciions. (0:2023garciaarchit.cture+dosign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

T1 .1
Attachment 2
TO , _ _, I KING
~\-
' , 4 STATEI-IWf46 TO_
•-j BAKERSFIB..D/ __ _
FRESNO
- ; PROJECT SITE EB
NORTH

I I I I M
----+---------+
~\f~tl ~ dn::11m by: plot dale:

Exhibit A

Page 676 of 959 ends

"1llli
@
20'
:

ALLEYWIDTHI
I I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
@I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
®I
I
I
I
I I
I I
�w-,-� -,,-r-r-r-,c-•, -,--,--r- - ->r-r-r-»-»-,--r-r-r-r-•, ->'->'-<>- - \\ 18th Street
', CD
CD
0 - __________ ! -------
I
@ I
----- I
I
------- ----1, ____ LJ __ _
L _J
"'
C
L ____ P1 --------
□
re
0 � / 9'-0"
I@
P.l.=140'
R
B
@
/
/
/
/
@
0 F
UNIT C1
COMMERClAL/RETAIL
1,971 S.F
LI
@
�� --l +- f----� ✓ -iYP r TYPICAL
I :

Site Plan/ Utility Plan
SC&E:1/8"=1'-0"

PRIVATE ON-SITE PARKING
9'-o�

TYPICAL
@
-------------_r __ ----
UNIT C2

B COMMERCIAL/RETAIL
1,138S.F
0 • 11 111 II'
1 0
@
®
I
'iii
I�
I
I
® I
I !
0 @
0 I
@ I
.I
®
CD
;
g
�
Sheet Reference Notes
(j) REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER PER CITY PAAl(j/AY STMIIDARDS (D REPI.ACE EXISTING AfJA O.JRB RAMP WITH CITY STANDARD C-11 CUP.B EXTENSION

CD NEW AC PAVING AREA
0 NEW CONffiETE FLAlWORK AREA
® 4' WIDE WHITE PAVEMENT STRIPING AND/OR PAVEMENT MARKING ® NEW 6" CONCRETE CURB
0 NEW CONCRETE FLAlWORK PER CITY STANDARDS
® ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM SEE ARO-lITECTIJRAL PLANS

Q) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE WITH VAN OFFLOAD AREA
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ® ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC R.0.W.
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PER CBC 11B-206.1, 11B-402.1 @ 3' DEEP TACTLE WARNING, TYPICAL. PER CBC 11 B-247.1
@ INDICATES LINE OF SOFRT ABOVE
@) REPLACE EXISTING ALLEY DRIVEWAY APRON PER CITY STANDARD C-5 ALLEY APPROACH @ INDICATES LJNE OF ROOF ABOVE
@ PARKING FOR (5) BICYCLE SPACES VIA 5 SPACE "PEAK" RACK @ NEW LANDSC',APING AREA
@ PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN
@) NEW PG&E PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER AND PAD. LOCATION PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. REFER TO PG&E HANDOUT

PACKAGE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
® EXISTlNG BUS STOP SHELTER
@ GA-5 LJNE STUB TO SITE PER CIVIL Pl.ANS, LOCATION TO BE VERIRED IN FELD @ NEW 4" FIRE LINE
@ NEW FIRE DITTCTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY (DCA); SCREEN WITH LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. @ NEW 1" WATER METER PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES STANDARDS
@ CITY STREET TREES TO REMAIN
@ P.0,C. FOR NEW BUILDING GAS SERVICE; CONNECT TO G.A.S MITTR MANIFOLD ARRAY @ NEW GAS METER MANIFOLD LOCATION
@ 2' WATER SERVICE, REFER TO PLUMBING Pl.ANS FOR CONTINUATION OF WATER INSIDE BULDING @) 6'TAll PIWAGYWALL
(D INDICATES LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUT AND/OR STORM DRAIN LJNE TO U.G, STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER @ INSTALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AT ENTRA.NCE TO PARKING LOT, REFER TO ADA/IDLE 22 FOR ADDITIONAL

INFORMATION
@) UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER
@ NEW STORMWATER DRAINAGE BIOSWAl.f
@) NEW 6' TAl.l CMLI OR CONCRETE TRASH ENQOSURE W/METAL GATES @) SECURITY/ SAFETY 80ll.AP,[)S
@ INDICATES ROUED / MOUNTABLE QJRB
@) EXISTING UTILITIES LOCAlED IN ALLPf
@) INDICATES PERMEABLE PAVER/ STORMWATER OFFSET AREA
@ NEW SEWER LINE
(D REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY WITH STANDMJ CITY SIDEWALK @ UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER; SEE C1 .1 GIWJING & DRAINAGE PLAN @ NEW STREET TREE; SPACING AND SPECIES PER CITY STANDAIIJS @ INSTALL NEW COBRA-HEAD LJGHT STANDARD PER CITY AND PG&E STANDARDS @ INSTALL NEW DECORATIVE STREET LIGHTS AS SHOWN; FIXTIJRE TO MATQ-1 FIXTIJRE AT 'PASO WALK' FRONTAGES @ EXISTlNG Al.lEY TO BE REPAVED TO THE SATISFACTION OFTI-IE CITY ENGINEERING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Legend

PL PROPERTYLJNE

R RAOIUS
s SEWER
w WATER
F ARE
u LJTILITIES (WIRE UTILITTES: PG&E, AT&T, CABLE)
El
II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05 . 7B3 . 18B0
fx: 805 . 783 . 1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Site Plan
Utility Plan
revision:
"" descriptioo
legal stuff:
issuedateby
'
Th1useofthesepla1"1Sandspeclflcatlonsshe!
be restrict ed to the use oltheDn!Jirial s�efor
whi ch lheywereprepared &ndpublic&lion thereof
is expressly limitad tosuchuHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhila rt:hilect. n1eto th11seplans
and -'Pfl<:ili<:ation,, ,..,main .. with i;iarc;a al'l'.:hitii<:tl +d..,signwilhoutprejudicft. Visual contactwith
the1M1plans andspecifications shallconslllute
p�mefaceevlder.ceoltheeccepti,nceolthese
ri,slriciions. (0:2023garciaarchitacturi,+dosign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

AS1 .1
Attachment 2
'i ii
I ffi ' "' is ;1 1' ~: b 1) ~~
TRASH

ENCLOSURE
®
15'-2''
D
0 \ ' I
----------/- ---------pl=140
I
/
/
0 15'

FRONT SETBACK
®
0 ® ©
~\f~tl ~ dn::11m by: plot dale:

Exhibit A

Page 677 of 959 ends

20'Alley
Landscape Plan
SC&E:1/8"=1'-0"
"1llli
TRASH

ENCLOSURE
0 /
/
□-
/
/
0 B
"
0 I
,11 111 UP
�.�eeee
eeeeee0 0
...... e:�e'1-ee:e�eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee,e:ee:e:e:�e-�
Preliminary Plant List

WUCOLS BOTANICALNAME/COMMONNAME
48" BOX VL OLEA EUROPEA WILSONU / MULTI-TRUNK FFUTLESS OUVE TREE LARGESHRUB.5(5
'P-"·5· • ,,_-,_ • <:�::_
• :{C
00 •0
,'ir..�•
,_,_,,n\
;· . !. ,,
�.,J
24"BOX L
15GAl) WUCOLS
BL
VL
VL
SHRUB.5 (1 - 5 GAL) WUCOLS
oe
*o
.,e,
eo
00 GROUNOCOVf.R(1 GAL) WUCOLS
0 .,ff} •
0 OLEA EUROPEA WILSONR / FRUITLESS OLM MULTI-TRUNK

BOTANICAL NAME/ COMMON NAME

AGAVE HARVARDIANA
C'.ANDELABRA ALOE/ ALOE ARBOP.ESCENS

PITOSPORUM TENUFOLIUM / PITOSPORUM SILVER SHEEN

ANIGOZANTHOS ORANGE CROSS/ ORANGE KANGAROO PAW

BOTANICAL NAME/ COMMON NAME

OLEA EUROPEA MONTRA / OLIVE BUSH
AGAl/f. SHAwa XATTENIJATA/ AGA\/f. BLUE FLAME
ALOE STRATIATA/ CORAi.ALOE

ROSEMARINUS OFFICIANALIS TUSCAN BLUE/ ROSEMARY

CRASSIFOLIUM COMPACTUM NANA COMPACT A/ PITOSPORUM

BOTANICAL NAME/ COMMON NAME
ROSEMARY OFFICIALALIS "PROSTRATUS" / ROSEMARY
ECHEVERIA "IMBICATA" / I-ENS &CHICKENS

ARCTPSTA PHYLOS ITOOKERI / MONTEREY CARPET MANZAITTA
SENECIO TALINOIOES VAR. MARORALISCAE / CHALKSTICKS
SENECIO TALINOIOES VAR. MARORAUSCAE/ CHALl<STICKS

BIO/ INRLTRATION GARDEN WUCOLS BOTANICAL NAME/ COMMON NAME SENECIO TALINOIDES VAR. MARORALISCAE/ CHALKSTICKS
SENECIO TALINOIOES VAR. MARORALISCAE / CHALKSTICKS
Sheet Reference Notes
CD OlJTLINE OF BUILDING OR ROOF ABOVE
(D NEW AC PAVING OR CONCRETE FLATWORK AREA

G) NEW PEIMDUS PAVERS
(D NEW STREET TREE; SPACING ANO SPECIES PER aTY STANDARDS ® NEW TRASH ENQOSURE
General Notes

1. PLANT FACTOR.S ARE BASED ON WUCOLS LATEST EDITION, ADJJSTED FOR LOCAL QIMATEAND SOIL TYPE.

2. All AIEAS \NITHOUT PLANTED GROUNDCOl/f.R SHALL RECEIVE 2" MIN. OF must-ED GRAVEL OR D.G.

3. IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTROLLERS SHALL BE WEATHER BASED.

4. SPRAY HEADS SHALL BE ADJJSTED TO ELIMINATE MN OVER-SPRAY AND RUNOFF FROM ADJACENT IMPERVK!US SURFACES.

Legend

GAL GALLON (CONTAINER SIZE)
WOCOLS WATER USE CIJ\SSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE SPECIES

L LOW WATER USAGE PER WUCOLS
VL VERYLOW WATERLJSl\GE PER WUCOLS

NCN NO COMMON NAME
El
II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05.7B3.18B0
fx: 805.783.1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Landscape Plan
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
'
legal stuff:

Th1use ofthesepla1"1Sandspeclflcatlons she!
be restricted to the use oltheDn!Jirial s�efor
whichlheywereprepared&ndpublic&lionlhereof
is expressly lirnitadto suchuHC11less otherwise
approv,idbylhila rt:hilect. n1eto th11seplans
and -'Pfl<:ili<:ation,, ...,main,.with i;iarc;a archi!io<:tl.n +d!lsignwilhoutprejudicft. Visual conta ctwith
theseplans andspecifications shallconslllute
p�mefaceevlder.ceoflhe eccepti,nceoflhese
ri,slriciions. (0:2023garcia archit.cturi,+dosign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet
L 1.1
Attachment 2
I
I -- + ----------------
t,.,:..,;r-~ - ""' ...... '7Yl \
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Street
_ _j__ --
t.

I
•
•
/fj
•
~\f~tl ~ dn::11m by: plot dale:

Exhibit A

Page 678 of 959 ends

i /
/
//
: I /////
: T //
I I ,,,,.
,,,
I I //
I /
I r
/
I /
I /
I /
I \
18th Street
-<C-f.--""-f.--fc -1.--<e-·a - -r•- c-+- ---"0-,------\1.--C-fJC-<C -flO-•.--,.--•c-lJC-<C -·a--r-,.-->S -1.--·.c-·ac-""-flO-f-- --·.C-fJC-·.C -·-,C-•.--flo-f--lJL-·.C -·-,c-1--fl'- --,.'->C -;c .. .c:.::_.-,_,,----,._._ flO-'C -NC-C -·-,C-•.S-fl0-
"1llli
1 \
I \
®
�--------
744.8 FS 743.9FS
� • ----. • • --------------------,-- � --- -�----� llli___fL_/ : 2:::; OUTLET ". BIOSWAL[

COORTYARD
FF=744.6
744.2FS
®
"
B10SWALE
<-"4--+t-+-- UP
FF=744.1
FF=744.35
(MATCH) � I
i
a�
J
®
45 rn
'
I 45 �
743.JFL �7
�=====:.L ____________________ _:_}----------�---�----·---�--_-_------ -�------_-. -_-_- .-_ -_- .-_-_ -�_-._ -�_-_-� Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan
SC&E: 1'=10'-D'
/ :

I I I '
I '
: I
10 20
Sheet Reference Notes
(j) REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER PER CITY PAAl(j/AY STMIIDARDS (D REPI.ACE EXISTING AfJA O.JRB RAMP WITH CITY STANDARD C-11 CUP.B EXTENSION

Q) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE WITH VAN OFFLOAD AREA
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ® ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC R.0.W.
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PER CBC 11B-206.1, 11B-402.1 @ 3' DEEP TACTLE WARNING, TYPICAL. PER CBC 11 B-247.1
@ INDICATES LINE OF SOFRT ABOVE
@) REPLACE EXISTING ALLEY DRIVEWAY APRON PER CITY STANDARD C-5 ALLEY APPROACH @ INDICATES LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
@ PARKING FOR (5) BICYCLE SPACES VIA 5 SPACE "PEAK" RACK @ NEW LANDSC',APING AREA
@ PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN
@) NEW PG&E PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER AND PAD. LOCATION PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. REFER TO PG&E HANDOUT

PACKAGE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
® EXISTlNG BUS STOP SHELTER
@ GA-5 UNE STUB TO SITE PER CIVIL Pl.ANS, LOCATION TO BE VERIRED IN FELD @ NEW 4" FIRE LINE
@ NEW FIRE DITTCTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY (DCA); SCREEN WITH LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. @ NEW 1" WATER METER PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES STANDARDS
@ CITY STREET TREES TO REMAIN
@ P.0,C. FOR NEW BUILDING GAS SERVICE; CONNECT TO G.A.S MITTR MANIFOLD ARRAY @ NEW GAS METER MANIFOLD LOCATION
@ 2' WATER SERVICE, REFER TO PLUMBING Pl.ANS FOR CONTINUATION OF WATER INSIDE BULDING @) 6'TAll PIWAGYWALL
(D INDICATES LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUT AND/OR STORM DRAIN LINE TO U.G, STORM WATER STORA.GE CHAMBER @ INSTALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AT ENTRA.NCE TO PARKING LOT, REFER TO ADA/IDLE 22 FOR ADDITIONAL

INFORMATION
@) UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER
@ NEW STORMWATER DRAINAGE BIOSWAl.f
@) NEW 6' TAl.l CMU OR CONCRETE TRASH ENQOSURE W/METAL GATES @) SECURITY/ SAFETY BOLLAP,OS
@ INDICATES ROUED / MOUNTABLE QJRB
@) EXISTlNG UTILITIES LOCAlED IN ALLPf
@) INDICATES PERMEABLE PAVER/ STORMWATER OFFSET AREA
@ NEW SEWER LINE
(D REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY WITH STMDMJ CITY SIDEWALK
@ UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER; SEE C1 .1 GIWJING & DRAINAGE PLAN @ NEW STREET TREE; SPACING MD SPECIES PER CITY STANDAIIJS @ INSTALL NEW COBRA-HEAD LIGHT STANDARD PER CITY AND PG&E STANDARDS @ INSTALL NEW DECORATIVE STREET LIGHTS AS SHOWN; FIXTIJRE TO MATQ-1 FIXTIJRE AT 'PASO WALK' FRONTAGES @ EXISTlNG Al.lEY TO BE REPAVED TO THE SATISFACTION OFTI-IE CITY ENGINEERING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Stormwater Requirements
EXISTING PROJECT SITE AREA: 21,(XX] S,F. / 0.48 ACRES
WMZ: 4
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS /\REA: 0 S.F. /0 ArnES
EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA: 21,000 S.F. / 0.48 ACP.ES
NEW ON-SITE PERVIOLtS AREA: 10,366 S.F.

NEW OFF-SITE (REPLACEMEN'T) IMPERVIOUS AREA: 4,270 S.F.

PR1 - SITE DESIGN+RUNOFF REDUCTION
PR2 - WATER QUAUTYTREATMENT

LID RETENTION
85TH PERCENTILE:=0.9'
TOTAL ON+OFF SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA= 14,636 S.F . ... PCR-2 LEVEL REQUIRED REOD, VOLUME= 14,636 S.F. X 0.9' = 1,098 C.F.

General Site Notes

1. GRADE SHALL SLOPE A MINIMUM OF 5% FOR A DISTANCE OF 10' AWAY FROM NEW BUILDING FOOTPPJNT OR 2% WHEN SURFACE IS IMPEFMOUS
El
II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05.7B3.18B0
fx: 805.783.1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Prelim Grading &
Drainage Plan
revision:
""descriptioo issuedateby
'
legal stuff:

Th1 useofth1seplar1Sandspeclflcatlons sha!
be restricted to the use oltheDn!Jirial s�efor
whichlheywere prepared&ndpublic&lionlhereof
is expressly lirnitadtosuch uHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhilart:hilect. n1eto th11seplans
and .,p11<:ifi<:ation,, ...,main .. with i;iarc;a archi!io<:tl.n +d!lsignwilhout prejudicft. Visual contactwith
thlS!lplans andspecifications shallconslllull
p�mefaceevlder.ceof lheeccept!lnceoflhese
ri,slriciions. (0:2023garciaarchit.cturi,+dosign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

C1 .1
Attachment 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
745.4 FS
(MAT~~)- I
L ______ _ I
I
I
I
@i
I
I
7 i
i
i
[
[
[
i
i@
~
: @ FF=744.6 I
I
I
I
I
20':Alley
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I ~ ® 1
: - \ I

FLUSH CURB
I ! ~=~ T, I i • • , r i i
l_ ( ' ~.;cs \,~ Jt:~:--:~:~-:~:~:~:~:~:~:J:~~:~:--:~:~J:~ ·±•~ • : I~ ® STORAGECHAMBER 7liN : : CD UNDERGROu~g:zi~ ~Ar~, CJ.) : I ! ~~ I ' : I : I : I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' l
_ .. _
. .

I
. .
! ~l I
:
!
I
.

I
I
!
I
. .
l !
i
~
ELEV I ELEVATOR EOOIP ®
. ----"----- I
CJ ~." I :

I
D
0 ..

M
"'
~
::;
~\f~tl ~ dn::11m by: ,:iot dale:

Exhibit A

Page 679 of 959 ends

"1llli
18th Street
0 ' N
'
"'
0 '
;,.
·
-o

0.H
24'-0"
\-..ro � ��+--+ �-----------
0 '
,_
0 '
;,.
'
"'
10·-o·
'
'
' I®:

L___: ' '
TRASH

ENCLOSURE
®
18'-6 1/2"
11s·-o·
r
L _J

COURTYARD
19'-5 1/2''

PRIVATE ON-SITE PARKING
CD
�===;::;;:_j_ -----------------------------
PL
=
140
'
First Floor Plan
SC&E:1/8"=1'-0"
P.l.=140'
24'-Q"
-...• --<·>,,
;.,'
H1
-if°700M
I
; ,µ
,lJ7
I Pl I
c
=
R
-==1)--_l_J
H2
HOTELROOM f [ "�
�:/ L
/
/
/
/
CD
-::t @ _j_ _ -----------------
24'-o"
[7
'
'
!
@
32'- '
UNIT C1

COMMERCIAL/RETAIL
1,971 S.F.

F
ELEV
EQUIP
ELECT
ROOM
B
56'-0"
l
)
l
j
LI
UNIT C2

COMMERCIAL/RETAIL
1,138S,F.
1 1 111 UP
32'-o"
--------------7
1s'-o"

FRONT SETBACK
"'
s
"'
0 2 4
\-..
·ro
16 Sheet Reference Notes
(j) REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER PER CITY PAAl(j/AY STMIIDARDS (D REPI.ACE EXISTING AfJA O.JRB RAMP WITH CITY STANDARD C-11 CUPiB EXTENSION

CD NEW AC PAVING AREA
0 NEW CONffiETE FLATWORK AREA
® 4' WIDE WHITE PAVEMENT STRIPING AND/OR PAVEMENT MARKING ® NEW 6" CONffiETE CURB
0 NEW CONCRETE FLAlWORK PER CITY STANDARDS
® ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM SEE ARO-lITECTIJRAL PLANS

Q) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE WITH VAN OFFLOAD AREA
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ® ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC R.0.W.
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PER CBC 11B-206.1, 11B-402.1 @ 3' DEEP TACTLE WARNING, TYPICAL. PER CBC 11 B-247.1
@ INDICATES LINE OF SOFRT ABOVE
@) REPLACE EXISTING ALLEY DRIVEWAY APRON PER CITY STANDAAD C-5 ALLEY APPROACH @ INDICATES LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
@ PARKING FOR (5) BICYCLE SPACES VIA 5 SPACE "PEAK" RACK @ NEW LANDSC',APING AREA
@ PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN
@) NEW PG&E PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER AND PAD. LOCATION PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. REFER TO PG&E HANDOUT

PACKAGE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
® EXISTlNG BUS STOP SHELTER
@ GA-5 UNE STUB TO SITE PER CIVIL Pl.ANS, LOCATION TO BE VERIRED IN FELD @ NEW 4" FIRE LINE
@ NEW FIRE DITTCTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY (DCA); SCREEN WITH LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. @ NEW 1" WATER METER PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES STANDAADS
@ CITY STREET TREES TO REMAIN
@ P.0,C. FOR NEW BUILDING GAS SERVICE; CONNECT TO G.A.S MITTR MANIFOLD ARRAY @ NEW GAS METER MANIFOLD LOCATION
@ 2' WATER SERVICE, REFER TO PLUMBING Pl.ANS FOR CONTINUATION OF WATER INSIDE BULDING @) 6'TAll PIWAGYWALL
(D INDICATES LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUT AND/OR STORM DRAIN UNE TO U.G, STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER @ INSTALL ACCESSIBLE PAAKING SIGN AT ENTRANCE TO PARKING LOT, REFER TO MJA/IDLE 22 FOR MJDITIONAL

INFORMATION
@) UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER
@ NEW STORMWATER DRAINAGE BIOSWAl.f
@) NEW 6' TAl.l CMU OR CONCRETE TRASH ENQOSURE W/METAL GATES @) SECURITY/ SAFETY BOLLAP,OS
@ INDICATES ROUED / MOUNTABLE QJRB
@_) EXISTING UTILITIES LOCAlED IN ALLPf
@) INDICATES PERMEABLE PAVER/ STORMWATER OFFSET AREA
@ NEW SEWER LINE
(D REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY WITH STMDMJ CITY SIDEWALK
@ UNDERGR.OIJND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER; SEE C1 .1 GIWJING & DRAINAGE Pl.AN @ NEW STREET TREE; SPACING MD SPECIES PER CITY STANDAIIJS @ INSTALL NEW COBRA-HEAD UGHT STANDARD PER CITY AND PG&E STANDARDS @ INSTALL NEW DECORATIVE STREET LIGHTS AS SHOWN; FIXTIJRE TO MATQ-1 FIXTIJRE AT 'PASO WALK' FRONTAGES @ EXISTlNG Al.lEY TO BE REPAVED TO THE SATISFACTION OFTI-IE aTY ENGINEERING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Legend

PL PROPERTYLJNE

R RADIUS

S SEWER

W WATER
F RRE
U LJTILITIES (WIRE UTILITTES: PG&E, AT&T, CABLE)
El
II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05 . 783 . 18B0
fx: 805 .783 .1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:
1 st Floor Plan
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
'
legal stuff:

Th1useofthasepla1"1Sand speclflcatlons sha!
be restricted to the use oltheDn!Jirial s�efor
which lheywereprepared&ndpublic&lionlhereof
isexpressly lirnitadto suchuHC11lessotherwise
appro v,idbylhila rt:hilact. n1eto th11seplans
and .,p11<:ifi<:ation,, ,..,main .. with i;iarc;a al'l'.:hi!ii<:tl +d..,signwilhoutprejudicft. Visual contactwith
the1M1plansand s?ftcifications shallconslllute
p�mefaceevlder.ceof theeccept!lnceollhese
ri,slriciions. (0:2023garciaarchit.cturi,+dosign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A1 .1
Attachment 2
-+--
0 c-'
b
"'
b
.,
~
~
\,
~ I ·..,
S1
S2
' ' ' ' '
L_7 '
,iil I 1'j'j I
~
"'
I :-" I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ ® j
--1 - 1-
. I
I
f All.Pf SETBACK
,-------
' ' ' ' '
,fi~ I~ j
[Q :;;;J
0 I
·:g
18]] $
[C,
-
20·-o~ 40'-531./&I'
ll
=r
·,q 111 UP
J i
_J
n i='
11 0
' ';,'
rn
---1
~\f~tl ~ dn::11m by: plot dale:

Exhibit A

Page 680 of 959 ends

"1llli
I
N
I
Ci
,-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 0 I
24'-0"
=--:::i
5'-Q" 30'-0"
I
117'-o" 1s'-o" I
19'-6" 32'-o"
"'Cl--_j__ ____ 11'-c___---',,8..�
I
<D
0 I
$+---+----
I
I
<D
0 I
;,,
UNIT R1
1-BEDROOM ��ii�
_JJ
UNITR3
· .· 1-BEDROOM �
I UNIT R4
1 :�ROOM
L_JJ
13'-1 9/16"
s
0 I
0 �
I
-:2 "'

COURTYARD
BELOW
12'-1 3/16" 11'-7 11/16" 3'-7 1/16"
LJn==LJ
H8
�□=
7C:l
19'-6� 32'-o"
'b
I
"'
"'
$
ro
I
0 I
$
-ro
$
0 -�
0 I
ro I
___ 1,·-, 1/2" _____________ 40•-s 1;r __________________________ 56'-o" _______________ / ---� -:----"�
11s·-o�
/ 15-□ I
Second Floor Plan
SC&E:1/8"=1'-0" 0 2 4
A1.5
16 Sheet Reference Notes
(j) REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER PER CITY PAAl(j/AY STMIIDARDS (D REPI.ACE EXISTING AfJA O.JRB RAMP WITH CITY STANDARD C-11 CUP.B EXTENSION

Q) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE WITH VAN OFFLOAD AREA
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ® ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC R.0.W.
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PER CBC 11B-206.1, 11B-402.1 @ 3' DEEP TACTLE WARNING, TYPICAL. PER CBC 11 B-247.1
@ INDICATES LINE OF SOFRT ABOVE
@) REPLACE EXISTING ALLEY DRIVEWAY APRON PER CITY STANDARD C-5 ALLEY APPROACH @ INDICATES LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
@ PARKING FOR (5) BICYCLE SPACES VIA 5 SPACE "PEAK" RACK @ NEW LANDSC'NING AREA
@ PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN
@) NEW PG&E PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER AND PAD. LOCATION PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. REFER TO PG&E HANDOUT

INFORMATION
@) UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER
@ NEW STORMWATER DRAINAGE BIOSWAl.f
@) NEW 6' TAl.l CMLI OR CONCRETE TRASH ENQOSURE W/METAL GATES @) SECURITY/ SAFETY BOLLARDS
@ INDICATES ROLLED / MOUNTABLE QJRB
@) EXISTlNG UTILITIES LOCATED IN ALLPf
@) INDICATES PERMEABLE PAVER / STORMWATER OFFSET AREA
@ NEW SEWER LINE
(D REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY WITH STMDMJ CITY SIDEWALK
@ UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER; SEE C1 .1 GIWJING & DRAINAGE PLAN @ NEW STREET TREE; SPACING MD SPECIES PER CITY STANDAIIJS @ INSTALL NEW COBRA-HEAD LJGHT STANDARD PER CITY AND PG&E STANDARDS @ INSTALL NEW DECORATIVE STREET LIGHTS AS SHOWN; FIXTIJRE TO MATQ-1 FIXTIJRE AT 'PASO WALK' FRONTAGES @ EXISTING Al.lEY TO BE REPAVED TO THE SATISFACTION OFTI-IE CITY ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Legend

PL PROPERTYLJNE

R RADIUS

S SEWER

W WATER
F RRE
U LJTILITIES (WIRE UTILITTES: PG&E, AT&T, CABLE)
El
II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05.7B3.18B0
fx: 805.783.1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:
2nd Floor Plan
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
'
legal stuff:

Th1use ofthesepla1"1Sand speclflcatlonsshe!
be restricted to the use oltheDn!Jirial s�efor
which lheywereprepared &ndpublic& lionlhereof
is expressly limitad to suchuHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhila rt:hilect. n1eto th11seplans
and -'Pfl<:ili<:ation,, ,..,main .. with i;iarc;a al'l'.:hitii<:tl +d..,signwilhoutprejudicft. Visual conta ctwith
the1M1plansand sp ecifications shallconslllute
p�mefaceevlder.ceollhe eccepti,nce ollhese
ri,slriciions. (0:2023garciaarchit.cturi,+dosign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A1 .2
Attachment 2
6 6
6 b
I a rn I
$~ - , I
"'
~
I I
~ I
I ---+- I
I
!
I
--,□'-□"-"
,-.
: - \ (::
=
H9 HOTELRCXW
I
~
e) --------------~ -
~\f~tl ~ dn::11m by: plot dale:

Exhibit A

Page 681 of 959 ends

Third Floor Plan
SC&E:1/8"=1'-0"
"1llli
,------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 117' o" 15-0 .-.. --7 l jo=I
,.=
O
"
A1.5
35· o
·
5'-6"
0 b I
'
in
19'-6"
19'-6"
32'-o"
D
[]
32'-o"
'b
I
'
"'
s
'j'
"'
$
ro
I
N
I
0 I
ro I
-------------------------------------------------- ss'-o" _______________ / ___ .
-
..
-
"�
1,s·-0� / 15-□ I
0 2 4 16
Sheet Reference Notes
(j) REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER PER CITY PAAl(j/AY STMIIDARDS (D REPI.ACE EXISTING AfJA O.JRB RAMP WITH CITY STANDARD C-11 CUP.B EXTENSION

Q) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE WITH VAN OFFLOAD AREA
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ® ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC R.0.W.
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PER CBC 11B-206.1, 11B-402.1 @ 3' DEEP TACTLE WARNING, TYPICAL. PER CBC 11 B-247.1
@ INDICATES LINE OF SOFRT ABOVE
@) REPLACE EXISTING ALLEY DRIVEWAY APRON PER CITY STANDARD C-5 ALLEY APPROACH @ INDICATES LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
@ PARKING FOR (5) BICYCLE SPACES VIA 5 SPACE "PEAK" RACK @ NEW LANDSC'NING AREA
@ PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN
@) NEW PG&E PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER AND PAD. LOCATION PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. REFER TO PG&E HANDOUT

PACKAGE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
® EXISTlNG BUS STOP SHELTER
@ GA-5 UNE STUB TO SITE PER CIVIL Pl.ANS, LOCATION TO BE VERIRED IN FELD @ NEW 4" FIRE LINE
@ NEW FIRE DITTCTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY (DCA); SCREEN WITH LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. @ NEW 1" WATER METER PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES STANDARDS
@ CITY STREET TREES TO REMAIN
@ P.0,C. FOR NEW BUILDING GAS SERVICE; CONNECT TO G.A.S MITTR MANIFOLD ARRAY @ NEW GAS METER MANIFOLD LOCATION
@ 2' WATER SERVICE, REFER TO PLUMBING Pl.ANS FOR CONTINUATION OF WATER INSIDE BULDING @) 6'TAll PIWAGYWALL
(D INDICATES LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUT AND/OR STORM DRAIN UNE TO U.G, STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER @ INSTALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AT ENTRA.NCE TO PARl<JNG LOT, REFER TO ADA/IDLE 22 FOR ADDITIONAL

INFORMATION
@) UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER
@ NEW STORMWATER DRAINAGE BIOSWAl.f
@) NEW 6' TAl.l CMLI OR CONCRETE TRASH ENQOSURE W/METAL GATES @) SECURITY/ SAFETY BOLLARDS
@ INDICATES ROUED I MOUNTABLE QJRB
@) EXISTlNG UTILITIES LOCAlED IN ALLPf
@) INDICATES PERMEABLE PAVER/ STORMWATER OFFSET AREA
@ NEW SEWER LINE
(D REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY WITH STANDMJ CITY SIDEWALK @ UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER; SEE C1 .1 GIWJING & DRAINAGE PLAN @ NEW STREET TREE; SPACING AND SPECIES PER CITY STANDAIIJS @ INSTALL NEW COBRA-HEAD UGHT STANDARD PER CITY AND PG&E STANDARDS @ INSTALL NEW DECORATIVE STREET LIGHTS AS SHOWN; FIXTIJRE TO MATQ-1 FIXTIJRE AT 'PASO WALK' FRONTAGES @ EXISTING Al.lEY TO BE REPAVED TO THE SATISFACTION OFTI-IE CITY ENGINEERING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Legend

PL PROPERTY LINE

R RADIUS

S SEWER

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:
3rd Floor Plan
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
legal stuff:

Th1useofthesepla1"1Sand speclflcatlons sha!
be restrict ed to the use olthe""ll1rial s�efor
whi ch lheywereprepared &ndpublic&tion thereof
is expressly limitadtosuch uHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhilart:hilect. n1eto th11seplans
and .. p11<:ifi<:ation,,,..,main,.withi;iarcia•� +d..,signwilhoutprejudicft. Visual contactw,th theseplans and specifications shallconslllul&
p�mefaceevlder.ceoftheeccept!lnceofthese
ri,slriciions. (0:2023garciaarchit.cture+dosign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A1 .3
Attachment 2
L~~=---ir
4 ~·-•· 1 ---===ic:::::::=:=r~ 7r'i' f
1 1 T11 r1, 7l-
-t= HOH ~ ""=="' H12
> -. ___.c_---c=fll HOTEL ROOM ---~ -
atp 1; I
1 Snn I] 7
H13 ......... ""i"""~ -=::a HOTELROOM ··•
~ , uil
J;LW
4'-6"
I
+--
10·-o·
~\f~tl ~ dn::11m by: ,:iot dale:

Exhibit A

Page 682 of 959 ends

Roof Plan
SC&E:1/8"=1'-0"
"1llli
,------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -
EE8
I!!!!
EEE!
===
aE
�
�
�
�
�
�
� �
11111
�
0 2 4
A1.5
16 Sheet Reference Notes
(j) REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER PER CITY PAAl(j/AY STMIIDARDS (D REPI.ACE EXISTING AfJA O.JRB RAMP WITH CITY STANDARD C-11 CUP.B EXTENSION

Q) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE WITH VAN OFFLOAD AREA
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ® ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC R.0.W.
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PER CBC 11B-206.1, 11B-402.1 @ 3' DEEP TACTLE WARNING, TYPICAL. PER CBC 11 B-247.1
@ INDICATES LINE OF SOFRT ABOVE
@) REPLACE EXISTING ALLEY DRIVEWAY APRON PER CITY STANDARD C-5 ALLEY APPROACH @ INDICATES LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
@ PARKING FOR (5) BICYCLE SPACES VIA 5 SPACE "PEAK" RACK @ NEW LANDSC'NING AREA
@ PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN
@) NEW PG&E PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER AND PAD. LOCATION PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. REFER TO PG&E HANDOUT

PACKAGE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
® EXISTlNG BUS STOP SHELTER
@ GA-5 UNE STUB TO SITE PER CIVIL Pl.ANS, LOCATION TO BE VERIRED IN FELD @ NEW 4" FIRE LINE
@ NEW FIRE DITTCTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY (DCA); SCREEN WITH LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. @ NEW 1" WATER METER PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES STANDARDS
@ CITY STREET TREES TO REMAIN
@ P.0,C. FOR NEW BUILDING GAS SERVICE; CONNECT TO G.A.S MITTR MANIFOLD ARRAY @ NEW GAS METER MANIFOLD LOCATION
@ 2' WATER SERVICE, REFER TO PLUMBING Pl.ANS FOR CONTINUATION OF WATER INSIDE BULDING @) 6'TAll PIWAGYWALL
(D INDICATES LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUT AND/OR STORM DRAIN UNE TO U.G, STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER @ INSTALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AT ENTRA.NCE TO PARl<JNG LOT, REFER TO ADA/IDLE 22 FOR ADDITIONAL

INFORMATION
@) UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER
@ NEW STORMWATER DRAINAGE BIOSWAl.f
@) NEW 6' TAl.l CMLI OR CONCRETE TRASH ENQOSURE W/METAL GATES @) SECURITY/ SAFETY BOLLARDS
@ INDICATES ROUED / MOUNTABLE QJRB
@) EXISTlNG UTILITIES LOCAlED IN ALLPf
@) INDICATES PERMEABLE PAVER/ STORMWATER OFFSET AREA
@ NEW SEWER LINE
(D REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY WITH STMDMJ CITY SIDEWALK
@ UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER.; SEE C1 .1 GIWJING & DRAINAGE Pl.AN @ NEW STREET TREE; SPACING MD SPECIES PER CITY STANDAIIJS @ INSTALL NEW COBRA-HEAD UGHT STANDARD PER CITY AND PG&E STANDARDS @ INSTALL NEW DECORATIVE STREET LIGHTS AS SHOWN; FIXTIJRE TO MATQ-1 FIXTIJRE AT 'PASO WALK' FRONTAGES @ EXISTlNG Al.lEY TO BE REPAVED TO THE SATISFACTION OFTI-IE CITY ENGINEERING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Legend

PL PROPERTY LINE

R RADIUS

S SEWER

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Roof Plan
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
'
legal stuff:

Th1use ofthesepla1"1Sand speclflcatlonssha!
be restricted to the use oltheDn!Jiria l s�efo r
whichlheywereprepared&ndpublic&lion lhereof
is expressly limitadto such uHC11lessotherwise
appro v,idbylhilart:hilect. n1eto th11seplans
and .. p11<:ifi<:ation,,remain .. withi;iarci••�
+d..,signwilhoutprejudicft. Visual contactwith
thlseplans and specifications sha llconslllut&
p�mefaceevlder.ceof lheeccepti,nceoflhese
ri,slriciions. (0:2023garcia architecturi,+dosign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A1 .4
Attachment 2
4 0
' -:2
~
' N
0 ';/ '
3'-o"
;.-, '
56'-o"
56'-o"

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
Fl - R
Fl R
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~ iiB~
======
~~~
~~~
~~~

ELEVATOR

PENTHOUSE
0 ~ '
4'-o"
" s
'j'
'"
' .._
0 ' 12
$
-ro
0 ';/ '
' ' "'-------~~+.-~---- ----~- ~~~------~-~--~-~ ----·~n'tr -------------------------------------- 3'-0" -------------- 56'-o" _______________ 3'-0" ----- ~\f~tl ~ dn::11m by: plot dale:

Exhibit A

Page 683 of 959 ends

+28'-6" � TCf'OFROJFPA.RAPET
+24'-6"
TCf' OF ROOF FRA\.11NG
+14'-0" ;fJ 2� FtJSH FLOOR
+7'-0" � Q_EARANCE@CA9FIBT
'� +0'-0'
1STFl�SHFLDa'l
P.L

MECH EQUIP
RESIDENllAL UNlf"R3"
□
CJ\RPORTPARKING
(D
�
�!.:,�est Building Section Looking North

EQUIPMENT HOTEL ROOF DECK

CORRIDOR HOTEL ROOM
-- D (STAIRWELJ,BEYOND)
RE8UJENTIAL UNIT'R8' �'-��________,,
c-----C
, RESIDENTIAL UNIT 'R7'
(STAIRWITnep'OND)

PARKING

CORRIDOR HOTEL ROOM

RETAIL SPACE
0 2 4
PL

SPRING STREET
16 +48'-0'
TOPOF ELEVATOR PENTHCllSE�
+39'-6"
TOP OF EQUPMENT SCREEN �
+36'-6",
TOPOFRCX:fCORNICE *
+35'-0"
TOP OF ROOF FPAMl'.G ,._.
+26'-6"
3RDFIN�Fl..(X]'.!
+14'-0"
2ND FIN�FLCX11. ,._.
+0'-0"
Sheet Reference Notes
(j) EXISTlNG CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND/OR PARKWAY TO REMAIN (D EXISTlNG ACCESSIBLE UJRB FIAMP TO REMAIN
CD NEW AC PAVING AREA 0 NEW CONffiETE FLAlWORK AREA ® 4' WIDE WHITE PAVEMENT STRIPING AND/OR PAVEMENT MARKING ® NEW 6" CONCRETE CURB 0 NEW 4" THICK CONCRETE FLATWORK ® ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM SEE ARO-lITECTIJRAL PLANS

Q) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE WITH VAN OFFLOAD AREA
@ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ® ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC R.0.W. @ ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PER CBC 11B-206.1, 11B-402.1 @ 3' DEEP TACTLE WARNING, TYPICAL. PER CBC 11 B-247.1
@ INDICATES LINE OF SOFRT ABOVE ® REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRON aTY NEW .APRON PER aTY STANDARDS @ INDICATES LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
@ PARKING FOR (5) BICYCLE SPACES VIA 5 SPACE "PEAK" RACK @ NEW LANDSC'NING AREA
@ PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN
@) NEW PG&E PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER AND PAD. LOCATION PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. REFER TO PG&E HANO OUT

PACKAGE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
® EXISTlNG BUS STOP SHELTER
@ GA-5 UNE STUB TO SITE PER CIVIL Pl.ANS, LOCATION TO BE VERIRED IN FELD @ NEW 4" FIRE LINE
@ NEW FIRE DITTCTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY (DCA); SCREEN WITH LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. @ NEW 1" WATER METER PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES STANDARDS
@ CITY STREET TREES TO REMAIN
@ P.0,C. FOR NEW BUILDING GAS SERVICE; CONNECT TO G.A.S MITTR MANIFOLD ARRAY @ NEW GAS METER MANIFOLD LOCATION
@ 2' WATER SERVICE, REFER TO PLUMBING Pl.ANS FOR CONTINUATION OF WATER INSIDE BULDING @) 6'TAll PIWAGYWALL
(D INDICATES LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUT AND/OR STORM DRAIN UNE TO U.G, STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER @ INSTALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AT ENTRA.NCE TO PARl<JNG LOT, REFER TO ADA /IDLE 22 FOR ADDITIONAL

INFORMATION
@) UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER
@ NEW STORMWATER DRAINAGE BIOSWAl.f
@) NEW 6' TAl.l CMLI OR CONCRETE TRASH ENQOSURE W/METAL GATES @) SECURITY/ SAFETY BOLLARDS
@ INDICATES ROUED I MOUNTABLE QJRB
@) EXISTlNG UTILITIES LOCATED IN ALLPf
@) INDICATES PERMEABLE PAVER / STORMWATER OFFSET AREA
@ NEW SEWER LINE
(D REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY WITH STANDMJ CITY SIDEWALK @ UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE CHAMBER; SEE C1 .1 GIWJING & DRAINAGE PLAN @ NEW STREET TREE; SPACING AND SPECIES PER CITY STANDAIIJS El II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05.7B3.18B0
fx: 805.783.1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Building Section
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
'
legal stuff:

Th1useofth1sepla1"1Sandspeclflcatlons sha!
be restricted to the use oltheDn!Jirial s�efor
whichlheywereprepared&ndpublic&lionlhereof
isexpressly limitadtosuch uHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhilart:hilect. n1etoth11seplans
and -'Pfl<:ili<:ation,, ,..main .. with i;iarc;a al'l'.:hitii<:tl +d..,signwilhout prejudicft. Visual contactwith
thl1M1plans andspecifications shallconslllull
p�mefaceevlder.ceollheeccepti,nceollhese
ri,slriciions. (0:2022garciaarchitacturi,+design
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A1 .5
Attachment 2
I
' _rci; ALITT !
I
I -
I e
Ml:tll<NICAl.i~ -------n:=~
~~ --
--,-----,-" ;=---=-~- ~~___}~L--=: LJ
Ill 11 1111 1 l[I....Jl_ ~ _.. . ____j_ l
~ Ir---: =======iFil =====;;:::=~
I ,-
~\f~tl ~ dn::11m by: plot dale:

Exhibit A

Page 684 of 959 ends

Rendering / View from Intersection of Spring Street & 18th Street Looking Southwest MJSG\LE
El
II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05 . 783 . 1B80
fx: 805 . 783 . 1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Renderings
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
legal stuff:

The use oftheseplar1Sandspeclflcatlonssha!
be reslricied to theusa olthe""ll1rialsnefor
whichlheywereprepamd&ndpublic&tionthereof
isexp re"61y limitadtosuchuHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhilart:hilact. nle to thaseplani;
and .. p11<:ifi<:ationsramain,.with i;iarci••�
+dasignwilhoutprejudica . Visu a lcontactw,th
the&eplans andspecificationsshallconslllul&
p�mafsceevlderoceoftheecceptanceofthese
"'•lriciions. (0:2022garciaarchi1"cture+d9osign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A2.1
Attachment 2
~\l~t>no.:
drmm by:
ptot dole:

Exhibit A

Page 685 of 959 ends

Rendering / View from 18th Street Looking Southeast
MJSG\LE
El II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05. 783. 1B80
fx: 805. 783. 1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Renderings
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
legal stuff:

The use oftheseplar1Sandspeclflcatlonssha!
be reslricied to theusa olthe""ll1rialsnefor
whichlheywereprepamd&ndpublic&tionthereof
isexp re"61y limitadtosuchuHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhilart:hilact. nle to thaseplani;
and .. p11<:ifi<:ationsramain,.with i;iarci••�
+dasignwilhoutprejudica . Visua lcontactw,th
the&eplans andspecificationsshallconslllul&
p�mafsceevlderoceoftheecceptanceofthese
"'•lriciions. (0:2022garciaarchi1"cture+d9osign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A2.2
Attachment 2
~\l~t>no.:
drmm by:
ptot dole:

Exhibit A

Page 686 of 959 ends

Rendering/ View from Alley Looking Northeast
MJSG\LE
El II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05. 783. 1B80
fx: 805. 783. 1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Renderings
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
legal stuff:

The use oftheseplar1Sandspeclflcatlonssha!
be reslricied to theusa olthe""ll1rialsnefor
whichlheywereprepamd&ndpublic&tionthereof
isexp re"61y limitadtosuchuHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhilart:hilact. nle to thaseplani;
and .. p11<:ifi<:ationsramain,.with i;iarci••�
+dasignwilhoutprejudica . Visua lcontactw,th
the&eplans andspecificationsshallconslllul&
p�mafsceevlderoceoftheecceptanceofthese
"'•lriciions. (0:2022garciaarchi1"cture+d9osign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A2.3
Attachment 2
~\l~t>no.:
drmm by:
ptot dole:

Exhibit A

Page 687 of 959 ends

Rendering / Spring Street Looking Northwest
MJSG\LE
El II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05. 783. 1B80
fx: 805. 783. 1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Renderings
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
legal stuff:

The use oftheseplar1Sandspeclflcatlonssha!
be reslricied to theusa olthe""ll1rialsnefor
whichlheywereprepamd&ndpublic&tionthereof
isexp re"61y limitadtosuchuHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhilart:hilact. nle to thaseplani;
and .. p11<:ifi<:ationsramain,.with i;iarci••�
+dasignwilhoutprejudica . Visua lcontactw,th
the&eplans andspecificationsshallconslllul&
p�mafsceevlderoceoftheecceptanceofthese
"'•lriciions. (0:2022garciaarchi1"cture+d9osign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A2.4
Attachment 2
~\l~t>no.:
drmm by:
ptot dole:

Exhibit A

Page 688 of 959 ends

SPRI�
East Elevation / Spring Street
SGALE: 1/8"-1'-0"
• •
ir •
ID ID
•••
North Elevation / 18th Street
SC&E:1/8"-1'-0"
0 2 4
0 2 4
+48'-0'
TOP OF EUVATOO fThlTl-0...GE
+39'-6' ,

TOP OF EQUIPMENT SCREEN
+36'-6'
TOP OF ROOF CORNU.
+35'-0'
TOP OF ROOF FRtiMm r�
+14'-0'
2NDFlr-JSHFLOOR
+0'-0'
1STFINISHFLOOR
16 +28'-6'
Ti OF RCCf PAPAPET $
. +24'-6'
T(J> OF ROOF FRAMI�
16 +14'-D'
2NDFl�FLOOR 1;
Exterior Color + Materials Reference Notes
Material Specifications:

G) McELROY "MEDALLION-LOK" 12" WIDE STANDING SEAA-1 METAL PANELS 2 METAL BAL.CO

NY RAIUNGSAND DECKING

WHITE OAK COMMERCIAL DOORS AND WINDOW STOREFRONTS

SMOOTH STEEL-TROWELED VENETIAN PLASTER

ALUMINUM QAD WINDOWS & DOORS

ARCHITECTURAL/ STRLCTURAL STEEL

ARCHITECTURAL SHEET METAL/ DECORATIVE COPING
2X2 VERTICAL WHITE OAK WOOD FENCING
9 STEEL CORNICE ELEMENT
10 "NEUTRA STYLE' AOORESS NUMBERS' 12' TALL
Color Specifications:
@ �AA
:R��R 500® (P\IDF) FINISH
@ �:��N��2�:

R
��N
��Y; MTIN FINISH
® �:��i��I-3□ IRON MOIJNTAJN; SATIN FINISH
CD ��i�
0�:��26 �� !�N��
RNIS/1
® ��:�!��gv:��!NW�i��
Exterior Color + Materials Samples
El II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05. 7B3. 18B0
fx: 805. 783. 1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Elevations
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
'
legal stuff:

The useofthesepla1"1Sandspeclflcatlonssha!
bereslricied totheuseoltheoritJirialsnefor
which lheywereprepamd &ndpublic&lionlhereof
is expre"61y limitadtosuch uHC11less otherwise
approv,idbylhilart:hila ct. Tnle tothaseplani;
and -'Pfl<:ili<:ations ramain .. with i;iaraa anc:hi!acu.n +dasign wilhoutpreju dice . Visua lcontaclwith
theseplans andspeci ficationssha llconslllute
p�mafsceevlderoceoflheecceptanceoflhese
"'•lriciions. (0:2022garciaarchi1"ctu"'+d9,sig n
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A3.1
Attachment 2
• II' •
+26'-6'
3RDFl~RDJR
+0'-0'
1STRNISHFLOOR
(if:£)
~
GXs>
GXD
~\l~t>no.:
drmm by: ptot dole:

Exhibit A

Page 689 of 959 ends

18THS
West Elevation / Alley
SGALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
+28'-6' �HPOF RCXJFP/iRA.FfT
+24'-6'
TOP OF ROOF FRAi\'1I�
+14'-D" './' 2ND FJIJISH FLOOR
+7-0"
CLEAR ANCE@
South Elevation
SC&E:1/8"=1'-0"
0 2 4
+48'-0'
TOP OF ELEVATOO fThlTl-0...GE
+39'-6' ,

TOP OF EQUIPMENT SCREEN
+36'-6'
TOP OF ROOF CORNU.
+35'-0'
TOP OF RCOF FRtiMm '.'�
16 +26'-6'
3RD Fl� FLOOR $
+14'-0' ,
2NDFlr-JSHFLOOR
+0'-0'
1STFINISHFLOOR
+48'-0'
TOP OF ELEVATOO FfNHO..BE
+39'-6'
TOP OF EQUIPMENT 9:REEN
+36'-6'
TCf' OF ROOF COR.NO:
+35'-D'
T DFRCX.fFR/iMI� $
+26'-6'
3RDFl�FLOOR
+14'-D'
2NDFl�FLOOR 1;
--.ll.--...P""'lU.l;..illl.""-1 1STFl�SH �� $
0 2 4
1m"3 ET
16 Exterior Color + Materials Reference Notes
Material Specifications:

G) McELROY "MEDALLION-LOK" 12" WIDE STANDING SEAA-1 METAL PANELS 2 METAL BAL.CO

NY RAIUNGSAND DECKING

WHITE OAK COMMERCIAL DOORS AND WINDOW STOREFRONTS

SMOOTH STEEL-TROWELED VENETIAN PLASTER

ALUMINUM QAD WINDOWS & DOORS

ARCHITECTURAL/ STRLCTURAL STEEL

R
��N
��Y; MTIN FINISH
® �:��i��I-3□ IRON MOIJNTAJN; SATIN FINISH
CD ��i�
0�:��26 �� !�N��
RNIS/1
® ��:�!��gv:��!NW�i��
Exterior Color + Materials Samples
(if:£)
�
GXD
GXD
�
El II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05. 7B3. 18B0
fx: 805. 783. 1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Elevations
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
'
legal stuff:

The useofthesepla1"1Sandspeclflcatlonssha!
bereslricied totheuseoltheoritJirialsnefor
whichlheywereprep amd&ndpublic&lionlhereof
isexp re"61y limitadtosuchuHC11lessotherwise
approv,idbylhilart:hilact. Tnle tothaseplani;
and -'Pfl<:ili<:ations ramain .. with i;iaraa anc:hi!acu.n +dasign wilhoutprejudice . Visualcontaclwith
theseplans andspaci ficationsshallconslllute
p�mafsceevlderoceoflheecceptanceoflhese
"'•lriciions. (0:2022garcia archi1"ctu"'+d9,sign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A3.2
Attachment 2
,,
+0'-0"
~\l~t>no.:
drmm by:
ptot dole:

Exhibit A

Page 690 of 959 ends

Aerial Rendering
El II■
garcia architecture + design
1308 monterey street,# 230
san luis obispo
california 93401
ph: B05. 783. 1B80
fx: 805. 783. 1881
www.garciaarchdesign.com
George Garcia, AIA C-24540
seal:
consultant:
project:

Tobin James Mixed Use
17 45 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA
93446
applicant/ owner:

Tobin James
5033 Vineyard Drive
Paso Robles, CA
93446
sheet title:

Aerial Rendering
revision:
"" descriptioo issuedateby
'
legal stuff:

The useoftheseplar1Sandspeclflcatlonssha!
be reslriciedto theusaoltheoritJirialsnefor
whic hlheywereprepamd&ndpublic&tionthereof
is expre"61ylimitadtosuc huHC11iessotherwise
approv,idbylhilart:hilact. nle ot t haseplani;
and .. p11<:ifi<:ationsramain,.with i;iarci••�
+dasign wilhoutprejudic a. Visua lcontactwith
the&eplans andspecificationsshallconslllul&
p�mafsceevlderoceoftheecceptance ofthese
"'•lriciions. (0:2022garciaarchi1"cture+d9osign
sheet data:
20220747
sheet:

A4.1
Attachment 2
~\l~t>no.:
drmm by:
pro,t dole:

Exhibit A

Page 691 of 959 ends

AI R QU AL IT Y &

GR E E N H O U S E GAS

I M P A C T AS S ES SM E N T
F O R

T O B I N J A M E S M I X E D U S E

P R O J E C T

P ASO R O B L E S , CA
AUGUST 2023
PREPARED BY:
75 HIGUERA STREET, SUITE 105
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
Attachment 3
AIR QUALllY & NOISE CONSUlJING
Exhibit A

Page 692 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction..................................................................................................................................................................1 Proposed Project Summary ........................................................................................................................................1 Air Quality .....................................................................................................................................................................1 Existing Setting..........................................................................................................................................................1 Regulatory Framework..........................................................................................................................................10 Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................................................13 Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change..............................................................................................................25 Existing Setting........................................................................................................................................................25 Regulatory Framework..........................................................................................................................................29 Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................................................34 References .................................................................................................................................................................42

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Common Pollutants & Adverse Effects .......................................................................................................5 Table 2. Summary of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data ....................................................................................7 Table 3. Air Quality Index Summary for Ozone & Related Health Effects .............................................................8 Table 4. Air Quality Index Summary for Fine Particulate Matter & Related Health Effects.................................9 Table 5. Air Quality Index Annual Historical Summary..............................................................................................9 Table 6. Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standards & Attainment Designations..............................................12 Table 7. SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Project-Level Construction Impacts......................................14 Table 8. SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Project-Level Operational Impacts.......................................15 Table 9. Daily Construction Emissions without Mitigation.......................................................................................18 Table 10. Quarterly Construction Emissions without Mitigation .............................................................................19 Table 11. Summary of Construction Emissions without Mitigation.........................................................................19 Table 12. Operational Emissions without Mitigation ...............................................................................................21 Table 13. Global Warming Potential for Greenhouse Gases ................................................................................26 Table 14. City of Paso Robles GHG Emissions Inventories ......................................................................................28 Table 15. Project-Level GHG Efficiency Threshold Calculation.............................................................................35 Table 16. Construction-Generated GHG Emissions without Mitigation................................................................36 Table 17. Operational GHG Emissions without Mitigation......................................................................................36 Table 18. Project Consistency with the City’s Climate Action Plan ......................................................................41

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Proposed Site Plan........................................................................................................................................2 Figure 2. Paso Robles Municipal Airport Wind Rose Plot ..........................................................................................4 Figure 3. California GHG Emissions Inventory by Sector & Subsector (2019) .......................................................27 Figure 4. California Black Carbon Emissions Inventory (Year 2013) ......................................................................28

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Emissions Modeling
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 693 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
ii

LIST OF COMMON TERMS & ACRONYMS
AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards
AB Assembly Bill
APS Alternative Planning Strategy
AQI Air Quality Index
ARB California Air Resources Board
ATCM Air Toxics Control Measure
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BACT Best Available Control Technology
BSC Building Standards Commission
C2F6 Perfluoroethane
C3F8 Perfluoropropane
C4F10 Perfluorobutane
C4F8 Perfluorocyclobutane
C5F12 Perfluoropentane
C6F14 Perfluorohexane
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CAMP Construction Activity Management Plan
CBC California Building Code
CCAA California Clean Air Act
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CF4 Perfluoromethane
CH4 Methane
City City of Paso Robles
CO Carbon Monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
CUP Conditional Use Permit
DP Development Plan
DPM Diesel-Exhaust Particulate Matter or Diesel-Exhaust PM EV Electric Vehicle
FCAA Federal Clean Air Act
GHG Greenhouse Gases
GWP Global Warming Potential
HAP Hazardous Air Pollutant
HFC Hydrofluorocarbons
LOS Level of Service
MMT Million Metric Tons
mph Miles per Hour
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
MT Metric Tons
N2O Nitrous Oxide
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NESHAPs National Emission Standards for HAPs
NF3 Nitrogen Trifluoride
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
NOA Naturally-Occurring Asbestos
NOX Oxides of Nitrogen
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 694 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
iii
O3 Ozone
OPR Office of Planning and Research
Pb Lead
PFC Perfluorocarbons
PM Particulate Matter
PM10 Fugitive Particulate Matter (less than 10 micrometers) PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter (less than 2.5 micrometers) ppb Parts per Billion
ppm Parts per Million
project Paso Robles Tobin James Mixed Use
PV Photovoltaic
ROG Reactive Organic Gases
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SB Senate Bill
SCCAB South Central Coast Air Basin
SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy
SF6 Sulfur Hexafluoride
SLCP Short-lived Climate Pollutant
SLOAPCD San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District
SLOCOG San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
SMAQMD Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
SP Service Population
TAC Toxic Air Contaminant
U.S. EPA United State Environmental Protection Agency
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
VOC Volatile Organic Compounds
μg/m3 Micrograms per cubic meter
μm Micrometer
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 695 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
1 INTRODUCTION
This report provides an analysis of air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts associated with the proposed development of the proposed project. This report also provides a summary of existing conditions in the project area and the applicable regulatory framework pertaining to air quality and climate change.

PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY
The proposed project is located at 1745 Spring Street, at the southwest corner of 18th and Spring Streets, in the City of Paso Robles, California. The applicant Tobin James is seeking Planning Commission approval of a new mixed use project. The project includes two commercial suites eight one‐bedroom residential units, as well as a sixteen-room boutique hotel. Additional site improvements will include on‐site commercial, residential, and hotel shared parking via open carport and surface parking spaces, along with requisite site landscaping, trash enclosure, lighting, and other typical commercial site improvements. The proposed project’s site plan is depicted in Figure 1.

AIR QUALITY
Existing Setting
The project is located in the City of Paso Robles (City), within the South Central Coast Air Basin (SCCAB) and within the jurisdiction of the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). Air quality in the SCCAB is influenced by a variety of factors, including topography, local and regional meteorology.

Topography
The City sits on the rolling hills of the eastern side of the Santa Lucia Mountain Range. It is bounded from the northwest by the Santa Lucia Mountain Range, which extends almost the entire length of the county. Rising sharply to about 3,000 feet at its northern boundary, the Santa Lucia Range gradually winds southward away from the coast, finally merging into a mass of rugged features on the north side of Cuyama Canyon. Point Buchon juts into the Pacific just south of Morro Bay to form the protective harbor of San Luis Obispo Bay. The Irish Hills are the dominant feature on this knob of land, rising abruptly from the shore to form steep cliffs and generally complex terrain from the Los Osos/Montana de Oro State Park area to Pismo Beach. These headlands have a pronounced influence on local wind flow patterns.

Estuaries are also a notable feature of the coastal areas, occurring wherever flowing streams meet the ocean. Morro Bay contains the region's largest estuary, with a saltwater marsh located on the east side where Chorro and Los Osos creeks enter the bay. This is one of the most significant wetlands remaining on the California coast and has been designated part of the National Estuary Program. It provides nesting habitat for blue herons, cranes and other important types of woodland birds and wildlife. Smaller coastal lagoons and marshes are also scattered along the county's shoreline.

Local and Regional Meteorology
The climate of the county can be generally characterized as Mediterranean, with warm, dry summers and cooler, relatively damp winters. Along the coast, mild temperatures are the rule throughout the year due to the moderating influence of the Pacific Ocean. This effect is diminished inland in proportion to the distance from the ocean or by major intervening terrain features, such as the coastal mountain ranges. As a result, inland areas are characterized by a considerably wider range of temperature conditions. Maximum summer temperatures average about 70 degrees Fahrenheit near the coast, while inland valleys are often in the high 90s. Minimum winter temperatures average from the low 30s along the coast to the low 20s inland (SLOAPCD 2001).

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 696 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
2 Figure 1. Proposed Site Plan
Source: Garcia Architecture + Design
Attachment 3
---------;,--1--~----1io------------------------· I : I \, (D fluU· .. , :- \ ·.··. r _ . .(!) _· .•
. .. -. . . - ------~--~ -------------------------
)
(
I
\
\
l ' \ I , . \
ffi Site Plan/ utility Plan w ~~---------------
0 Sheet Reference Notes
(!) -~-.a.TD,-.--n-
© mM-.tlllll_,,_.
(J)...,,t._
©aaa1111m~
(!) .. -...oat~~ ..... - .............
(D D f'«-"IQII
© •Jll r l'lp~~
0)-..i..-... NOIU--~
@-•-N:>..-•--
®-roo,:irr-.-
® -.t,.-,.,;,,,__,_ • ..,0/AA.
@~fln.S~-•-•nl-d~
® fll!PIIQC -i-t".M,~ans.i,a-,
®-•--
@----"""'lffl-"""'"'°"'11111110G!;
®~ --- ®-ra&
®••,_,,,..- i:s:i~---!U,
® ==--== .. l'ICI-•-... -----_ .. __
(II MU..a nt!llM IM.. nt wrn:tflllll-
@ ' .l.t.fJl'lllllllMllf. _____ ~-
@ -""Uill&:lll~WII-
® r"""•~-•1~~-M ... M•·n11--nar,o:
® "--
® Nfllft.-- r,_,-11D-llfl"IIW..--..-?1,__
@=..:i,._.._, _,.,..,ll._11-...,.0, .... 11a.1,t)f•,..- - ®-Dll-.flfll'.--
®11t111---. ® .... .... _ .. _____ _
® Dll""t ,-U-,-
® 1$.11:iJ:...-~-""'
(II« lffmill:l,ll) " UII"
® © --~-
n-... ·--- ® __ _..,..,._;t"!"__.,
Legerid -~
i "'" '"'.._"""'_
■
a
. . .. , . .. ... i:'t' •• .,
"" =,• • e . , • e~: r>-11 0
_, ......... ,,~ ,., ... ,
Tct.ir"1Jarne!1iMim:IUse --·
1745Splng Sllvet Pa90Rdile5,CA
9JA S
~,-:

TobinJamn
~~=~iriY9
IIJA4&
-·"' S~e Plan util ity Plan
I
AS1 .1
Exhibit A

Page 697 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
3 Regional meteorology is largely dominated by a persistent high-pressure area which commonly resides over the eastern Pacific Ocean. Seasonal variations in the strength and position of this pressure cell cause seasonal changes in the weather patterns of the area. The Pacific High remains generally fixed several hundred miles offshore from May through September, enhancing onshore winds and opposing offshore winds.

During spring and early summer, as the onshore breezes pass over the cool water of the ocean, fog and low clouds often form in the marine air layer along the coast. Surface heating in the interior valleys dissipates the marine layer as it moves inland (SLOAPCD 2001).

From November through April the Pacific High tends to migrate southward, allowing northern storms to move across the county. About 90 percent of the total annual rainfall is received during this period. Winter conditions are usually mild, with intermittent periods of precipitation followed by mostly clear days. Rainfall amounts can vary considerably among different regions in the county. In the Coastal Plain, annual rainfall averages 16 to 28 inches, while the Upper Salinas River Valley generally receives about 12 to 20 inches of rain. The Carrizo Plain is the driest area of the county with less than 12 inches of rain in a typical year (SLOAPCD 2001).

Airflow around the county plays an important role in the movement and dispersion of pollutants. The speed and direction of local winds are controlled by the location and strength of the Pacific High-pressure system and other global patterns, by topographical factors, and by circulation patterns resulting from temperature differences between the land and sea. In spring and summer months, when the Pacific High attains its greatest strength, onshore winds from the northwest generally prevail during the day. At night, as the sea breeze dies, weak drainage winds flow down the coastal mountains and valleys to form a light, easterly land breeze (SLOAPCD 2001).

In the Fall, onshore surface winds decline, and the marine layer grows shallow, allowing an occasional reversal to a weak offshore flow. This, along with the diurnal alternation of land-sea breeze circulation, can sometimes produce a "sloshing" effect. Under these conditions, pollutants may accumulate over the ocean for a period of one or more days and are subsequently carried back onshore with the return of the sea breeze. Strong inversions can form at this time, "trapping" pollutants near the surface (SLOAPCD 2001).

This effect is intensified when the Pacific High weakens or moves inland to the east. This may produce a "Santa Ana" condition in which air, often pollutant-laden, is transported into the county from the east and southeast.

This can occur over a period of several days until the high-pressure system returns to its normal location, breaking the pattern. The breakup of Santa Ana conditions may result in relatively stagnant conditions and a buildup of pollutants offshore. The onset of the typical daytime sea breeze can bring these pollutants back onshore, where they combine with local emissions to cause high pollutant concentrations. Not all occurrences of the "post-Santa Ana" conditions lead to high ambient pollutant levels, but it does play an important role in the air pollution meteorology of the county (SLOAPCD 2001).

Predominant wind flow in the project area, based on historical meteorological data from the Paso Robles Municipal Airport, is depicted in Figure 2. As depicted, wind flow in the project area is predominantly from the northwest, averaging approximately 6.7 miles per hour (mph). Calm winds are present an average of approximately 26.8 percent of the time.

Atmospheric Stability and Dispersion
Air pollutant concentrations are primarily determined by the amount of pollutant emissions in an area and the degree to which these pollutants are dispersed into the atmosphere. The stability of the atmosphere is one of the key factors affecting pollutant dispersion. Atmospheric stability regulates the amount of vertical and horizontal air exchange or mixing that can occur within a given air basin. Restricted mixing and low wind speeds are generally associated with a high degree of stability in the atmosphere. These conditions are characteristic of temperature inversions (SLOAPCD 2001).

In the atmosphere, air temperatures normally decrease as altitude increases. At varying distances above the earth's surface, however, a reversal of this gradient can occur. This condition termed an inversion, is simply a warm layer of air above a layer of cooler air, and it has the effect of limiting the vertical dispersion of pollutants. The height of the inversion determines the size of the mixing volume trapped below. Inversion strength or intensity is measured by the thickness of the layer and the difference in temperature between the Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 698 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
4 base and the top of the inversion. The strength of the inversion determines how easily it can be broken by wind or solar heating (SLOAPCD 2001).

Figure 2. Paso Robles Municipal Airport Wind Rose Plot
Source: Iowa Environmental Mesonet 2023
Several types of inversions are common to this area. Weak, surface inversions are caused by radiational cooling of air in contact with the cold surface of the earth at night. In valleys and low-lying areas, this condition is intensified by the addition of cold air flowing downslope from the hills and pooling on the valley floor. Surface inversions are a common occurrence throughout the county during the winter, particularly on cold mornings when the inversion is strongest. As the morning sun warms the earth and the air near the ground, the inversion lifts, gradually dissipating as the day progresses. During the late spring and early summer months, cool air over the ocean can intrude under the relatively warmer air over land, causing a marine inversion. These inversions can restrict dispersion along the coast, but they are typically shallow and will dissipate with surface heating (SLOAPCD 2001).

In contrast, in the summertime, the presence of the Pacific high-pressure cell can cause the air mass aloft to sink. As the air descends, compressional heating warms it to a temperature higher than the air below. This Attachment 3
C
~
~ Windrose Plot for [PRB] Paso Robles
Obs Between: 31 Dec 1972 04 :00 PM - 23 Mar 2023 12:53 AM America/Los_Angeles w
Calm values are < 2.0 mph
Bar Convention: Meteorology
Flow arrows relative to plot center.

Generated: 23 Mar 2023
- 2 - 4.9 - 5 - 6.9
N
s

5.0%

4.0%

3.0%

2.0%
Wind Speed [mph]
E
Summary
Obs Used: 428156
bs Without Wind : 15338
Avg Speed: 6. 7 mph
7 - 9.9 10 - 14.9 - 15 - 19.9 - 20+
Exhibit A

Page 699 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
5 highly stable atmospheric condition, termed a subsidence inversion, is common to all of coastal California and can act as a nearly impenetrable lid to the vertical mixing of pollutants. The base of the inversion typically ranges from 1000 to 2500 feet above sea level; however, levels as low as 250 feet, among the lowest anywhere in the state, have been recorded on the coastal plateau in San Luis Obispo County. The strength of these inversions makes them difficult to disrupt. Consequently, they can persist for one or more days, causing air stagnation and the buildup of pollutants. Highest or worst-case ozone levels are often associated with the presence of this type of inversion (SLOAPCD 2001).

Criteria Air Pollutants
For the protection of public health and welfare, the Clean Air Act (CAA) required that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for various pollutants. These pollutants are referred to as "criteria" pollutants because the U.S. EPA publishes criteria documents to justify the choice of standards. These standards define the maximum amount of an air pollutant that can be present in ambient air without harm to the public’s health. An ambient air quality standard is generally specified as a concentration averaged over a specific time period, such as one hour, eight hours, 24 hours, or one year. The different averaging times and concentrations are meant to protect against different exposure effects. The CAA allows states to adopt additional or more health-protective standards. The air quality regulatory framework and ambient air quality standards are discussed in greater detail later in this report.

Human Health & Welfare Effects
Common air pollutants and associated adverse health and welfare effects are summarized in Table 1. Within the SCCAB, the air pollutants of primary concern, with regard to human health, include ozone, particulate matter (PM) and carbon monoxide (CO). As depicted in Table 1, exposure to increased pollutant concentrations of ozone, PM and CO can result in various heart and lung ailments, cardiovascular and nervous system impairment, and death.

Table 1. Common Pollutants & Adverse Effects
Pollutant Human Health & Welfare Effects
Particulate Matter
(PM10 & PM2.5)
Increased respiratory symptoms, such as irritation of the airways, coughing, or difficulty breathing; aggravated asthma; development of chronic bronchitis; irregular heartbeat; nonfatal heart attacks; and premature death in people with heart or lung disease. Impairs visibility (haze).

Ozone
(O3)
Irritates and causes inflammation of the mucous membranes and lung airways; causes wheezing, coughing and pain when inhaling deeply; decreases lung capacity; aggravates lung and heart problems. Damages plants; reduces crop yield. Damages rubber, some textiles, and dyes.

Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2)
Respiratory irritant. Aggravates lung and heart problems. In the presence of moisture and oxygen, sulfur dioxide converts to sulfuric acid which can damage marble, iron and steel; damage crops and natural vegetation. Impairs visibility. A precursor to acid rain.

Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
Reduces the ability of blood to deliver oxygen to vital tissues, effecting the cardiovascular and nervous system. Impairs vision, causes dizziness, and can lead to unconsciousness or death.

Nitrogen Dioxide
(NO2)
Respiratory irritant; aggravates lung and heart problems. A precursor to ozone and acid rain.

Contributes to global warming, and nutrient overloading which deteriorates water quality.

Causes brown discoloration of the atmosphere.

Lead
(Pb)
Anemia, high blood pressure, brain and kidney damage, neurological disorders, cancer, lowered IQ. Affects animals, plants, and aquatic ecosystems.

Source: ARB 2018
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 700 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
6 Odors
Typically, odors are generally regarded as an annoyance rather than a health hazard. However, manifestations of a person’s reaction to foul odors can range from psychological (i.e. irritation, anger, or anxiety) to physiological, including circulatory and respiratory effects, nausea, vomiting, and headache.

Neither the state nor the federal governments have adopted rules or regulations for the control of odor sources. The SLOAPCD does not have an individual rule or regulation that specifically addresses odors; however, odors would be applicable to SLOAPCD’s Rule 402, Nuisance. Any actions related to odors would be based on citizen complaints to local governments and the SLOAPCD. The SLOAPCD recommends that odor impacts be addressed in a qualitative manner. Such analysis shall determine if the project results in excessive nuisance odors, as defined under the California Code of Regulations, Health & Safety Code Section 41700, air quality public nuisance.

Toxic Air Contaminants
Toxic air contaminants (TACs) are air pollutants that may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or serious illness, or which may pose a hazard to human health. TACs are usually present in minute quantities in the ambient air, but due to their high toxicity, they may pose a threat to public health even at very low concentrations. Because there is no threshold level below which adverse health impacts are not expected to occur, TACs differ from criteria pollutants for which acceptable levels of exposure can be determined and for which state and federal governments have set ambient air quality standards. TACs, therefore, are not considered “criteria pollutants” under either the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) or the California Clean Air Act (CCAA) and are thus not subject to National or State ambient air quality standards (AAQS). TACs are not considered criteria pollutants in that the FCAA and CCAA do not address them specifically through the setting of National or State AAQS. Instead, the U.S. EPA and California Air Resources Board (ARB) regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) and TACs, respectively, through statutes and regulations that generally require the use of the maximum or best available control technology to limit emissions. In conjunction with District rules, these federal and state statutes and regulations establish the regulatory framework for TACs. At the national levels, the U.S. EPA has established National Emission Standards for HAPs (NESHAPs), in accordance with the requirements of the FCAA and subsequent amendments. These are technology-based source-specific regulations that limit allowable emissions of HAPs.

Within California, TACs are regulated primarily through the Tanner Air Toxics Act [Assembly Bill (AB) 1807] and the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588). The Tanner Act sets forth a formal procedure for ARB to designate substances as TACs. This includes research, public participation, and scientific peer review before ARB designates a substance as a TAC. Existing sources of TACs that are subject to the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act are required to: (1) prepare a toxic emissions inventory; (2) prepare a risk assessment if emissions are significant; (3) notify the public of significant risk levels; and (4) prepare and implement risk reduction measures.

At the state level, the ARB has authority for the regulation of emissions from motor vehicles, fuels, and consumer products. Most recently, Diesel-exhaust particulate matter (DPM) was added to the ARB list of TACs. DPM is the primary TACs of concern for mobile sources. Of all controlled TACs, emissions of DPM are estimated to be responsible for about 70 percent of the total ambient TAC risk. The ARB has made the reduction of the public’s exposure to DPM one of its highest priorities, with an aggressive plan to require cleaner diesel fuel and cleaner diesel engines and vehicles (ARB 2005).

At the local level, air districts have authority over stationary or industrial sources. All projects that require air quality permits from the SLOAPCD are evaluated for TAC emissions. The SLOAPCD limits emissions and public exposure to TACs through a number of programs. The SLOAPCD prioritizes TAC-emitting stationary sources, based on the quantity and toxicity of the TAC emissions and the proximity of the facilities to sensitive receptors. The SLOAPCD requires a comprehensive health risk assessment for facilities that are classified in the significant-risk category, pursuant to AB 2588. No major existing sources of TACs have been identified in the project area.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 701 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
7 Asbestos
Asbestos is the common name for a group of naturally-occurring fibrous silicate minerals that can separate into thin but strong and durable fibers. Naturally-occurring asbestos (NOA), which was identified as a TAC in 1986 by ARB, is located in many parts of California and is commonly associated with ultramafic rock. The project site is not located within an area identified as having a potential for naturally-occurring ultramafic rock and serpentine soils.

Ambient Air Quality
Air pollutant concentrations are measured at several monitoring stations in the SCCAB. The Paso RoblesSanta Fe Avenue is the closest representative monitoring station with sufficient data to meet U.S. EPA and/or ARB criteria for quality assurance. Ambient monitoring data was obtained for the last three years of available measurement data (i.e., 2019 through 2021) and is summarized in Table 2. As depicted, the state and federal fine PM (PM2.5) standards were exceeded for 11 days in 2020. The state standard for fugitive PM (PM10) was exceeded for 4 days in 2020. The national standard for 8-hour ozone concentration was exceeded for 2 days in 2020. Measured 1-hour ozone and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations did not exceed the state and federal ambient air quality standards in the last three years of monitoring.

Table 2. Summary of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Pollutant
Monitoring Year
2019 2020 2021
Ozone (O3)
(1)
Maximum concentration (1-hour/8-hour average; ppm) 0.077/0.064 0.092/0.073 0.070/0.064 Number of days state/national 1-hour standard exceeded 0/0 0/0 0/0 Number of days state/national 8-hour standard exceeded NA/0 NA/2 NA/0 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
(2)
Maximum concentration (1-hour average; ppb) 34.0 33.0 44.0 Number of days state/national standard exceeded 0/0 0/0 0/0 Suspended Particulate Matter (PM2.5)
(2)
Maximum 24-hour concentration (national/state; μg/m3) 17.3/17.3 242.1/242.1 19.1/19.1 Number of days national standard exceeded
(measured/calculated)(3) 0/0 11/11.1 0/0
Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10)
(1)
Maximum concentration (national/state; μg/m3) 134.4/138.0 367.8/357.2 74.4/74.7 Number of days state standard exceeded
(measured/calculated)(3) 9/NA 35/36 3/3.1
Number of days national standard exceeded
(measured/calculated)(3) 0/0 4/4 0/0
ppm = parts per million by volume, μg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter, NA=Not Available

1. Based on ambient concentrations obtained from the Paso Robles-Santa Fe Avenue. Monitoring Station.

2. Based on ambient concentrations obtained from the Atascadero-Lift Station #5 Monitoring Station.

3. Measured days are those days that an actual measurement was greater than the standard. Calculated days are estimated days that measurement would have exceeded the standard had measurements been collected every day.

Source: ARB 2023
Air Quality Index
The health effects of ambient air pollutant concentrations can be evaluated and presented in various ways.

The most common method is the use of the Air Quality Index (AQI). The U.S. EPA developed the AQI as an easy-to-understand measure of health impacts based on measured ambient air quality in comparison to Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 702 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
8 established ambient air quality standards. Tables 3 and 4 present a summary of the health impacts for ozone and PM2.5, respectively, based on the U.S. EPA’s AQI.

A summary of the annual air quality index for the project area, based on monitoring data obtained from the Paso Robles monitoring station for the last three years of available data, is provided in Table 5. As depicted in Table 5, the project area typically experiences "good” air quality with the total number of days ranging from 178 to 211 days per year. Days classified as “moderate” AQI ranged from 124 to 184 days per year. Over the last three years of available data, the area has experienced a total of 32 days classified as “Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups”, 8 days classified as “Unhealthy”, and 2 days classified as “Very Unhealthy”. Over the past three years, the area has not experienced air quality conditions within the “Hazardous” range (U.S. EPA 2022).

Table 3. Air Quality Index Summary for Ozone & Related Health Effects Air Quality Index / 8-hour Ozone
Concentration Health Effects Description
AQI 51-100: Moderate
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 55-70 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.

Health Effects Statements: Unusually sensitive individuals may experience respiratory symptoms.

Cautionary Statements: Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting prolonged outdoor exertion.

AQI 101-150: Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 71-85 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.

Health Effects Statements: Increasing likelihood of respiratory symptoms and breathing discomfort in active children and adults and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma.

Cautionary Statements: Active children and adults, and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma, should limit prolonged outdoor exertion.

AQI 151–200: Unhealthy
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 86-105 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.

Health Effects Statements: Greater likelihood of respiratory symptoms and breathing difficulty in active children and adults and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma; possible respiratory effects in general population.

Cautionary Statements: Active children and adults, and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma, should limit prolonged outdoor exertion; everyone else, especially children, should limit prolonged outdoor exertion.

AQI 201-300: Very Unhealthy
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 106-200 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.

Health Effects Statements: Increasingly severe symptoms and impaired breathing likely in active children and adults and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma; increasing likelihood of respiratory effects in general population.

Cautionary Statements: Active children and adults, and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma, should avoid outdoor exertion; everyone else, especially children, should limit outdoor exertion.

An AQI of 50 and below is categorized as “Good” and air quality is satisfactory, and poses little or no risk. An AQI of 301 or higher is categorized as “Hazardous” having a health warning of emergency conditions: everyone is more likely to be affected. Outdoor activities should be avoided for all individuals.

AQI = Air quality index, ppb = parts per billion
Source: U.S. EPA 2022
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 703 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
9 Table 4. Air Quality Index Summary for Fine Particulate Matter & Related Health Effects
AIR QUALITY INDEX / 8-HOUR OZONE

CONCENTRATION
Health Effects Description
AQI 51-100: Moderate
Ambient Concentrations: 12.1-35.4 µg/m3
Sensitive Groups: Some people who may be unusually sensitive to particulate.

Health Effects Statements: Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.

Cautionary Statements: Unusually sensitive people: Consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion. Watch for symptoms such as coughing or shortness of breath. These are signs to take it easier.

AQI 101-150: Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
Ambient Concentrations: 35.5-55.4 µg/m3
Sensitive Groups: People with heart or lung disease, older adults, children, and teenagers.

Health Effects Statements: Increasing likelihood of respiratory symptoms for sensitive individuals, aggravation of heart or lung disease and premature mortality in persons with cardiopulmonary disease, and the elderly.

Cautionary Statements: If you have heart disease: Symptoms such as palpations, shortness of breath, or unusual fatigue may indicate a serious problem. If you have any of these, contact a health care provider.

AQI 151–200: Unhealthy
Ambient Concentrations: 55.5-150.4 µg/m3
Sensitive Groups: Everyone.

Health Effects Statements: Increased aggravation of heart or lung disease and premature mortality in persons with cardiopulmonary disease, and the elderly; increased respiratory effects in general population.

Cautionary Statements: Sensitive groups: Avoid prolonged or heavy exertion. Consider moving activities indoors or rescheduling. Everyone else: Reduce prolonged or heavy exertion. Take more breaks during outdoor activities.

AQI 201-300: Very Unhealthy
Ambient Concentrations: 150.5-250.4 µg/m3
Sensitive Groups: Everyone.

Health Effects Statements: Significant aggravation of heart or lung disease and premature mortality in persons with cardiopulmonary disease, and the elderly; significant increase in respiratory effects in general population.

Cautionary Statements: Sensitive groups: Avoid all physical activity outdoors. Move activities indoors or reschedule to a time when air quality is better. Everyone else: Avoid prolonged or heavy exertion. Consider moving activities indoors or reschedule to a time when air quality is better.

An AQI of 50 and below is categorized as “Good” and air quality is satisfactory and poses little or no risk. An AQI of 301 or higher is categorized as “Hazardous” having a health warning of emergency conditions: everyone is more likely to be affected. Outdoor activities should be avoided for all individuals.

AQI = Air quality index, µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter Source: U.S. EPA 2022a
Table 5. Air Quality Index Annual Historical Summary
Year
Air Quality Index (AQI) - Number of Days
Good Moderate
Unhealthy for
Sensitive Groups Unhealthy
Very
Unhealthy Hazardous
2022 178 184 3 0 0 0
2021 209 148 8 0 0 0
2020 211 124 21 8 2 0
Represents overall air quality taking into account all criteria pollutants measured.

Source: U.S, EPA 2022b
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 704 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
10 Regulatory Framework
Air quality within the SCCAB is regulated by several jurisdictions including the U.S. EPA, ARB, and the SLOAPCD.

Each of these jurisdictions develops rules, regulations, and policies to attain the goals or directives imposed upon them through legislation.

Federal
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
At the federal level, the U.S. EPA has been charged with implementing national air quality programs. The U.S.

EPA’s air quality mandates are drawn primarily from the FCAA, which was signed into law in 1970. Congress substantially amended the FCAA in 1977 and again in 1990.

FEDERAL CLEAN AIR ACT
The FCAA required the U.S. EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or National AAQS), and also set deadlines for their attainment. Two types of NAAQS have been established: primary standards, which protect public health, and secondary standards, which protect public welfare from nonhealth-related adverse effects, such as visibility restrictions. NAAQS are summarized in Table 6.

State

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
The ARB is the agency responsible for coordination and oversight of state and local air pollution control programs in California and for implementing the CCAA of 1988. Other ARB duties include monitoring air quality (in conjunction with air monitoring networks maintained by air pollution control districts and air quality management districts, establishing California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), which in many cases are more stringent than the NAAQS, and setting emissions standards for new motor vehicles. The CAAQS are summarized in Table 6. The emission standards established for motor vehicles differ depending on various factors including the model year, and the type of vehicle, fuel, and engine used.

CALIFORNIA CLEAN AIR ACT
The CCAA requires that all air districts in the state endeavor to achieve and maintain CAAQS for Ozone, CO, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) by the earliest practicable date. The CCAA specifies that districts focus particular attention on reducing the emissions from transportation and area-wide emission sources, and the act provides districts with authority to regulate indirect sources. Each district plan is required to either (1) achieve a five percent annual reduction, averaged over consecutive 3-year periods, in districtwide emissions of each non-attainment pollutant or its precursors, or (2) to provide for the implementation of all feasible measures to reduce emissions. Any planning effort for air quality attainment would thus need to consider both state and federal planning requirements.

ASSEMBLY BILLS 1807 & 2588 - TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS
Within California, TACs are regulated primarily through AB 1807 (Tanner Air Toxics Act) and AB 2588 (Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987). The Tanner Air Toxics Act sets forth a formal procedure for ARB to designate substances as TACs. This includes research, public participation, and scientific peer review before ARB designates a substance as a TAC. Existing sources of TACs that are subject to the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act are required to: (1) prepare a toxic emissions inventory; (2) prepare a risk assessment if emissions are significant; (3) notify the public of significant risk levels; and (4) prepare and implement risk reduction measures.

IN-USE OFF-ROAD DIESEL VEHICLE REGULATION
On July 26, 2007, the ARB adopted a regulation to reduce DPM and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) emissions from in-use (existing) off-road heavy-duty diesel vehicles in California. The regulation applies to self-propelled diesel-fueled vehicles that cannot be registered and licensed to drive on-road, as well as two-engine vehicles Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 705 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
11 that drive on road, with the limited exception of two-engine sweepers. Examples include loaders, crawler tractors, skid steers, backhoes, forklifts, airport ground support equipment, water well drilling rigs, and twoengine cranes. Such vehicles are used in construction, mining, and industrial operations. The regulation does not apply to stationary equipment or portable equipment such as generators. The off-road vehicle regulation establishes emissions performance requirements, reporting, disclosure, and labeling requirements for off-road vehicles, and limits unnecessary idling.

CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
The California Building Code (CBC) contains standards that regulate the method of use, properties, performance, or types of materials used in the construction, alteration, improvement, repair, or rehabilitation of a building or other improvement to real property. The California Building Code is adopted every three years by the Building Standards Commission (BSC). In the interim, the BSC also adopts annual updates to make necessary mid-term corrections. The CBC standards apply statewide; however, a local jurisdiction may amend a CBC standard if it makes a finding that the amendment is reasonably necessary due to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions.

GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
In essence, green buildings standards are indistinguishable from any other building standards. Both standards are contained in the CBC and regulate the construction of new buildings and improvements. The only practical distinction between the two is that whereas the focus of traditional building standards has been protecting public health and safety, the focus of green building standards is to improve environmental performance.

AB 32, which mandates the reduction of GHG emissions in California to 1990 levels by 2020, increased the urgency around the adoption of green building standards. In its scoping plan for the implementation of AB 32, ARB identified energy use as the second largest contributor to California’s GHG emissions, constituting roughly 25 percent of all such emissions. In recommending a green building strategy as one element of the scoping plan, ARB estimated that green building standards would reduce GHG emissions by approximately 26 million metric tons (MMT) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) by 2020.

The May 2018 green buildings standards referred to as the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, focuses on four key areas: smart residential photovoltaic systems, updated thermal envelope standards (preventing heat transfer from the interior to the exterior and vice versa), residential and nonresidential ventilation requirements, and nonresidential lighting requirements. The ventilation measures improve indoor air quality, protecting homeowners from air pollution originating from outdoor and indoor sources. Under the standards, nonresidential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy due mainly to lighting upgrades. The recently updated 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards also require new homes built after January 1, 2020 to be equipped with solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. The solar PV systems are to be sized based on the buildings annual electricity demand, the building square footage, and the climate zone within which the home is located. However, under the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, homes may still rely on other energy sources, such as natural gas. Compliance with the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, including the solar PV system mandate, residential dwellings will use approximately 50 to 53 percent less energy than those under the 2016 standards. Actual reduction will vary depending on various factors (e.g., building orientation, sun exposure). Non-residential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy due mainly to lighting upgrades (CEC 2019).

The recently updated 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (2022 Standards), which were approved in December 2021, encourages efficient electric heat pumps, establishes electric-ready requirements when natural gas is installed and to support the future installation of battery storage, and further expands solar photovoltaic and battery storage standards. The 2022 Standards extend solar PV system requirements, as well as battery storage capabilities for select land uses, including high-rise multi-family and non-residential land uses, such as office buildings, schools, restaurants, warehouses, theaters, grocery stores, and more.

Depending on the land use and other factors, solar systems should be sized to meet targets of up to 60 percent of the structure’s loads. These new solar requirements will become effective January 1, 2023 and contribute to California’s goal of reaching net-zero carbon footprint by 2045 (CEC 2022).

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 706 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
12 Table 6. Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standards & Attainment Designations Source: SLOAPCD 2019
Attachment 3
,callfom!a Standards ...... Federal Standards ......

Pollu1ant Avaraglngi Time AttaJ11ment At1alnme11t Conce11tratton, Statu~ C:oncentratlon Status 1 Hour 0.09 p,pm (180 ~/ml) - Non-Mainment
Eastern SLO
Ozon:e ,(Oa) Non-Attainment 0.070 ppm
County8 Hour 0.070 APm (137 ~ml) Attainment
(1 37 l,lg/m3 ),-·• West.emSLO
County+ ..

Rnplrable 24 Hour 50~,rw 150 1-1glm3 Unclassified·/ Partlculam, Annual Non-Atta"rtment Atta·nment Matter ,(PM10) Arittrmetiic Mean 20~/irn-"l - F[ne, Pal'ilculate 24 Hour No State S1aindard 35119fm3
Unclassified·/ Atta inment Matter (P,Mi2.S) Annual 12 ~m3 12_o~m3 - Attainment Arith.metiic Mean
8 Hour g,_o ppm (10 mg/ml) 9 ppm (1 O mg/ml)
Carbon Attainmenl Unclassifioo• Mo11oxlda (CO,) 1 Hour 20 ppm (23 ~ /,rw), 35 ppm (40 mg/ml) Annual 0.030 ppm ,s1 ~ Jiml) 0.053 ppm (1 00 1-1gfm3) Nitrogen Arith.metic Mean Attainment Unc1assifioo• DI.oxide (NO2} 1 Hour 0.18 ~pm f.330 ~ Jiml) 100 ~pb rrn6 mglm3 ), Annual 0.030 ppm (80 11gfm3} Arithmetic Mean -
Sulfur Dioxide 24 Hour 0.04 p,pm (105 ~ Jiml) 0.14 ppm (365 11gfm3} (S°'2) Atta inment Unclassifioo•
3 Hour - 0.5 ppm (1300 l)g/mlr
1 Hour 0.25 ~pm (655 ~ /ml) 75 ppb (Hl6 ~m3)
30 Day Average 1.5 11gl'rn3 -
Lead* Calendar Quarter - Atta inment rn11g1rw No Attainment Information Rolling 3-Month
Averaae-· - 0.151,Jg/m3
ie:Jllil'ICUM COl!!rtitiH>I d 0.23
i:,er lomel:8 - •i•illii'I' or IHI
mile-s «more (0.07,30 mies
Vl:Slblllty « mo,e kif Latle Tahoe) due
Reducing 8 Hour lo ~- IM wlW!n rela e, Atta inment IMJmldlty le-s• lll" n ro No Particles percem. Mi!1hod: Silts.

Mtel'AJ,.Uon aind
T,..,.,,,~ oe lhmugh Filter
Tai)!; Federal .

Sulfatn 24 Hour 25 ~ /m3 Atta inment
Hydrogen Standards
S1111f1de 1 Hour 0.03 ppm (42 ~/ml) Atta inment
Vlny Chlorld'.e'* 24 Hour 0.01 ppm {26 ~ /ml) No Alitainment lnfoimation
Uncta .. ified (El'NFoomol ddi o>ilioo}: Afll an.~~ tlt0t cor,o>oo be ,:,I· ifi "'' tl"' ba ;:, of a,,ai bl\? mfo1mat.ioo a. me..'ti.ng o, 1>00 me.'tio>g ti.., 1>a1ioo· prim· or sc-evnda,y aa,'liiictit air qua lity ;.iandatd for· 1hat po111Rarn. •• Soooliila~• S1a:ndatd ••• San Ltti Ollisp0Coon1y bas b=,&,.ig_aa100 nOB- a1mai:nmcnt ,c-.1S1 of the -120. deg Lu1>gi1ooe li:lre, im a.c-as ofSlO C<»1.n1)' that are somb ofll!!~ru.tl? 3S.45 d~;:., aod ,cas, of1hi: - 120..3 d cgn:: ' l..img_imde 6ni:. in att,H of LO , ourn lha1 n:: ,,,o,it, of rat.im~ 35.45 dtg,,ci,,',l_ -11!,p of Mti-auaimtll!nl ;1:1ta. is a~.,,aa • i: 11po,; tt:q,u.:sa fi'= it,~ APCO. ..,. • fof 1ttC11t i11furma1ioo oo >.1at111atds vt.it:!mp//ww o&,e,1 'i:s>Y "'""'®II o;ws/;l,1Q•' pdf Attliln11 111 (EP A!Fctk"'I &f,ni1i.m): Any a,,ea d ial me.'1,1 !hi: natiott0I primary o, ""con ry a,r,bi,im ait quality stoi><brd fur that pol!Ulant. (CA de fin i1ioo): tote stfll:ld!ird w..s m11 ootc.:ioooo lh:u:ing a lhi:te ~•= p.rioo. ..., . .. f.,,kral PM2.S Soc.:md· Stamdilid is ISµ ·rJn,1 . o tt~lllnM!mt (El'A/Fe-Jl?tal dcfinitio.,; , N,y at'(!; that d oe. 1>00.1nooi, or Clllftll'ib11t 10 a,; ;1:1ta llta.t doc not all!l<"l tbe na1iwial ptiimry or seco.nd.!.t)' ambio!:!tl ai:t quality stfll:ld!ird fot di.1.1 pollu.1or,1. ( 'A d fitiitian), Swe st:l:ild· ~"'• e~oo a1 le.is.1 oo~ dutiitg a 1hn::@ I ar j!Oln;OO. • • .. • .. The 200 NAAQS fM !!Ii . uzooc i, 0,.0,S ppm. Tue- 2015 AAQS fo, hr ozut1e- is 0.070 P1it111. Th~ anai1> n"'1l.t 51aru;; . .lw~'n i,; !lti talik- n;.lam to die 100S or,d 2015 AAQS. St.O Courny hli 1,,,;,dc-sigliatcd ruln-aJtoinmc, u of1hi:20IS AAQS. NAAQS . .a1ioo0 A.,.,,i.,.,, AirQ-ualiry tond!ird, ,.ol!Tot.AClrA-- R"'•ised.laima,y 29. 20!9 Exhibit A

Page 707 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
13 Local

COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT The SLOAPCD is the agency primarily responsible for ensuring that NAAQS and CAAQS are not exceeded and that air quality conditions within the region are maintained. Responsibilities of the SLOAPCD include, but are not limited to, preparing plans for the attainment of ambient air quality standards, adopting and enforcing rules and regulations concerning sources of air pollution, issuing permits for stationary sources of air pollution, inspecting stationary sources of air pollution and responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, and implementing programs and regulations required by the FCAA and the CCAA.

CITY OF PASO ROBLES
The City’s General Plan includes numerous policies related to air quality. These policies address emissions generated by mobile and non-mobile sources and land use compatibility. The General Plan includes the following policies related to air quality:
• Circulation Element - Policy CE-1A. Circulation Master Plan. Revise/update the City’s Circulation Master Plan to address the mobility needs of all users of the streets, roads and highways including motorists, movers of commercial goods, seniors, children, pedestrians, disabled persons, users of public transportation, and bicyclists.
• Circulation Element - Policy CE-1B. Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). The City shall strive to reduce VMT generated per household per weekday by making efficient use of existing transportation facilities and by providing direct routes for pedestrians and bicyclists through the implementation of sustainable planning principles.
• Circulation Element - Policy CE-1C. Airport. Improve/expand transportation to and from the Paso Robles Municipal Airport as set forth in the Airport Master Plan • Circulation Element - Policy CE-1D. Transit. Improve and expand transit services. • Circulation Element - Policy CE-1E. Rail. Promote regional, interstate and intra-state rail service. • Circulation Element - Policy CE-1F. Pedestrian and Bicycle Access. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access to all areas of the City. • Conservation Element - Policy C-2A. Traffic Congestion Reduction. Implement circulation systems improvements to reduce congestion and associated air contaminant emissions. • Conservation Element - Policy C-2B. VMT Reduction. Implement programs to reduce the number of VMT, especially by single occupant vehicles, including providing opportunities for mixed-use projects.
• Conservation Element - Policy C-2C. Emissions Reduction. Take steps to reduce creation of air contaminant emissions.

Impact Analysis
Thresholds of Significance
In accordance with Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, air quality impacts associated with the proposed project would be considered significant if it would:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

To assist in the evaluation of air quality impacts, the SLOAPCD has developed recommended significance thresholds, which are contained in the SLOAPCD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (2012). For the purposes of this analysis, project emissions are considered potentially significant impacts if any of the following SLOAPCD thresholds are exceeded:

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 708 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
14 Construction Impacts
The threshold criteria established by the SLOAPCD to determine the significance and appropriate mitigation level for a project’s short-term construction emissions are presented in Table 7 and discussed, as follows (SLOAPCD 2012):

Table 7. SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Project-Level Construction Impacts Pollutant
Threshold(1)
Daily (lbs/day) Quarterly Tier 1
(tons)
Quarterly Tier 2
(tons)
Ozone Precursors (ROG + NOX) 137 2.5 6.3
Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) 7 0.13 0.32
Fugitive Particulate Matter (PM10), Dust(2)-- 2.5 --

1. Daily and quarterly emissions thresholds are based on the California Health & Safety Code and the ARB Carl Moyer Guidelines.

2. Any project with a grading area greater than 4.0 acres of a worked area can exceed the 2.5 tons PM10 quarterly threshold.

Source: SLOAPCD 2012
ROG and NOx Emissions
Daily: For construction projects exceeding the 137 lbs/day threshold requires Standard Mitigation Measures.

Quarterly – Tier 1: For construction projects exceeding the 2.5 tons/quarter threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures and Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for construction equipment. Off-site mitigation may be required if feasible mitigation measures are not implemented, or if no mitigation measures are feasible for the project.

Quarterly – Tier 2: For construction projects exceeding the 6.3 tons/quarter threshold, Standard Mitigation Measures, BACT, implementation of a Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP) and off-site mitigation are required.

DPM Emissions
Daily: For construction projects exceeding the 7 lbs/day threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures.

Quarterly - Tier 1: For construction projects lasting more than one quarter, exceedance of the 0.13 tons/quarter threshold requires Standard Mitigation Measures, BACT for construction equipment; and, Quarterly - Tier 2: For construction projects exceeding the 0.32 tons/quarter threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures, BACT, implementation of a CAMP, and off-site mitigation.

Fugitive Particulate Matter (PM10), Dust Emissions
Quarterly- Tier 1: For construction projects exceeding the 2.5 tons/quarter threshold requires Fugitive PM10 dust Mitigation Measures and may require the implementation of a CAMP.

Operational Impacts
Criteria Air Pollutants
The threshold criteria established by the SLOAPCD to determine the significance and appropriate mitigation level for long-term operational emissions from a project are presented in Table 8.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 709 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
15 Table 8. SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Project-Level Operational Impacts Pollutant
Threshold(1)
Daily (lbs/day) Annual (tons/year)
Ozone Precursors [reactive organic gas (ROG) + oxides
of nitrogen (NOX)]
25 25
Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM)(2) 1.25 --
Fugitive Particulate Matter (PM10), Dust 25 25
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550 --

1. Daily and annual emissions thresholds are based on the California Health & Safety Code Division 26, Part 3, Chapter 10, Section 40918 and the ARB Carl Moyer Guidelines for DPM.

2. Applies to on-site emissions. DPM is seldom emitted from individual projects in quantities which lead to local or regional air quality attainment violations.

Source: SLOAPCD 2012
For projects exceeding the 25 lbs/day operational ozone precursor threshold but not the corresponding 25 tons/year annual threshold, the project shall implement all applicable SLOAPCD-recommended mitigation measures. Off-site mitigation may be required for projects (exceeding the 25 lbs/day threshold) if all applicable SLOAPCD-recommended mitigation measures are not implemented, or if no mitigation measures are feasible for the project (SLOAPCD 2017).

Toxic Air Contaminants
If a project has the potential to emit toxic or hazardous air pollutants, or is located in close proximity to sensitive receptors, impacts may be considered significant due to increased cancer risk for the affected population, even at a very low level of emissions. For the evaluation of new proposed land use projects that generate TACs, such as diesel-fueled engines, the SLOAPCD has defined the excess cancer risk significance threshold at 10 in a million.

Localized CO Concentrations
Localized CO concentrations associated with the proposed project would be considered a less-thansignificant impact if: (1) Traffic generated by the proposed project would not result in deterioration of signalized intersection level of service (LOS) to LOS E or F; or (2) the project would not contribute additional traffic to a signalized intersection that already operates at LOS of E or F (Caltrans 1996).

Odors
Screening of potential odor impacts is typically recommended for the following two situations:
• Projects that would potentially generate odorous emissions proposed to locate near existing sensitive receptors or other land uses where people may congregate; and • Residential or other sensitive receptor projects or other projects that may attract people locating near existing odor sources.

If the proposed project would locate receptors and known odor sources within one mile of each other, a full analysis of odor impacts is recommended. Known odor sources of primary concern, as identified by the SLOAPCD include landfills, transfer stations, asphalt batch plants, rendering plants, petroleum refineries, and painting/coating operations, as well as, composting, food processing, wastewater treatment, chemical manufacturing, and feedlot/dairy facilities.

Methodology
Emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), version 2022.1.1.12, computer program. Project construction is anticipated to occur over an approximately 14-to-16-month period beginning in July 2024. Construction phase durations were based provided information. No existing structure would be demolished. Based on information provided by the project proponent approximately 750 cubic yards of fill would be exported.

Additional construction information such as off-road equipment use, worker vehicle trips, and equipment Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 710 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
16 load factors were based on default parameters contained in the model. Modeling assumptions and output files are included in Appendix A of this report.

Long-term operational emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod, version 2022.1.1.12 based, in part, on vehicle trip-generation rates derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project (CCTC 2023). Vehicle travel distribution/distances were not available and were based on model defaults for San Luis Obispo County. Emission modeling files are provided in Appendix A.

Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Impact AQ-A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? SLOAPCD Clean Air Plan
As part of the CCAA, the SLOAPCD is required to develop a plan to achieve and maintain the state ozone standard by the earliest practicable date. The SLOAPCD’s 2001 Clean Air Plan addresses the attainment and maintenance of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The Clean Air Plan was adopted by SLOAPCD’s on March 26, 2002.

The SLOAPCD’s Clean Air Plan outlines the District's strategies to reduce ozone-precursor pollutants [i.e., reactive organic gas (ROG) and NOX] from a wide variety of sources. The SLOAPCD’s Clean Air Plan includes a stationary-source control program, which includes control measures for permitted stationary sources; as well as transportation and land use management strategies to reduce motor vehicle emissions and use. The stationary-source control program is administered by SLOAPCD. Transportation and land use control measures are implemented at the local or regional level, by promoting and facilitating the use of alternative transportation options, increased pedestrian access and accessibility to community services and local destinations, reductions in VMT, and promotion of congestion management efforts. In addition, local jurisdictions also prepare population forecasts, which are used by SLOAPCD to forecast population-related emissions and air quality attainment, including those contained in the SLOAPCD’s Clean Air Plan. As a result, consistency with the SLOAPCD’s Clean Air Plan has been evaluated based on the proposed project’s consistency with the land use management strategies and transportation control measures identified in the Clean Air Plan. This analysis also provides an analysis of regional VMT and consistency with regional VMTreduction efforts. Regional VMT estimates are relied upon for regional air quality planning purposes. Regional VMT and growth projections are used to determine the strategies to be implemented sufficient to reach the emission reduction targets set by the ARB through Senate Bill (SB) 375 which is transportation legislation that supports the broader 2030 emission reduction targets required in SB 32.

Transportation and Land Use Control Measures
The SLOAPCD’s Clean Air Plan includes multiple transportation and land use control measures intended to reduce emissions through reductions in VMT and the promotion of alternative forms of transportation. The project would comply with current building standards pertaining to the promotion of alternative means of transportation, including onsite bicycle parking requirements, as well as measures related to the promotion of alternatively-fueled/electric vehicles. In addition, based on the traffic analysis prepared for this project, implementation of the proposed project would result in overall reductions in regional VMT (CCTC 2023).

Projected Population, Employment & VMT Growth
According to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, the City has about 27 percent more jobs than housing units, indicative of a “jobs-rich” community. The City’s jobs to housing ratio is estimated to improve from a year 2015 ratio of 1.27 jobs/housing to a ratio of 1.19 jobs/housing by year 2030. The proposed project would result in increased employment which could further exacerbate this imbalance. However, as noted above, implementation of the proposed project would result in overall reductions in regional VMT (CCTC 2023). As a result, the proposed project would not conflict with regional VMT-reduction efforts and associated reductions in mobile-source emissions accounted for in the SLOAPCD’s Clean Air Plan. As a result, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 711 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
17 Particulate Matter Report – Implementation of SB 656 Requirements In July 2005, SLOAPCD adopted the Particulate Matter Report (PM Report). The PM Report identifies various measures and strategies to reduce public exposure to PM emitted from a wide variety of sources, including emissions from permitted stationary sources and fugitive sources, such as construction activities. As discussed in Impact AQ-B, particulate emissions generated during construction would not exceed applicable SLOAPCD significance thresholds. SLOAPCD-recommended standard mitigation measures have also been incorporated to reduce construction-generated emissions of fugitive dust. As a result, the proposed project would not conflict with PM-reduction planning efforts. This impact would be considered less than significant.

Impact AQ-B. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Short-term Construction Emissions
Construction-generated emissions are of temporary duration, lasting only as long as construction activities occur, but have the potential to represent a significant air quality impact. Construction of the proposed project would result in the temporary generation of emissions associated with clearing, site prep, grading, building construction, paving, motor vehicle exhaust associated with construction equipment and worker trips, as well as the movement of construction equipment on unpaved surfaces. Short-term construction emissions would result in increased emissions of ozone-precursor pollutants (i.e., ROG and NOX) and emissions of PM. Emissions of ozone-precursors would result from the operation of on- and off-road motorized vehicles and equipment. Emissions of airborne PM are largely dependent on the amount of ground disturbance associated with site preparation activities and can result in increased concentrations of PM that can adversely affect nearby sensitive land uses.

Estimated maximum daily and quarterly emissions associated with construction of the proposed project are presented in Table 9 and Table 10, respectively. Construction generated emissions were compared to SLOAPCD’s recommended significance thresholds (Daily, Quarterly Tier 1, and Quarterly Tier 2). As depicted in Table 9, maximum daily emissions associated with project construction would total approximately 19 lbs/day of ROG+NOX and <1 lbs/day of PM2.5 exhaust. As depicted in Table 10, maximum quarterly construction-generated emissions would total approximately 1.4 tons/quarter of ROG+NOX, <0.1 tons/quarter of fugitive PM10 dust, and <0.1 tons/quarter of PM2.5 exhaust.

Maximum daily and quarterly construction emissions would not exceed SLOAPCD’s daily or quarterly significance threshold. For this reason, construction-generated emissions would be considered to have a lessthan-significant impact.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 712 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
18 Table 9. Daily Construction Emissions without Mitigation Construction
Activity Year
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)(1)
ROG NOX ROG+NOX CO
PM10 PM2.5
Exhaust Dust Total Exhaust Dust Total
Grading 2024 1.19 11.4 12.59 10.7 0.53 5.31 5.84 0.49 2.57 3.06 Building Construction 2024 0.56 5.6 6.16 6.98 0.26 0 0.26 0.23 0 0.23 Building Construction 2025 0.52 5.14 5.66 6.94 0.22 0 0.22 0.2 0 0.2 Paving 2025 0.54 4.37 4.91 5.31 0.19 0 0.19 0.18 0 0.18 Architectural Coating 2025 4.56 0.88 5.44 1.14 0.03 0 0.03 0.03 0 0.03 SLOAPCD Daily Thresholds
(pounds/day) -- -- 137 -- -- -- -- 7 -- --
Maximum Daily Emissions-Year 2024(2) 1.75 17 18.75 17.68 0.79 5.31 6.1 0.72 2.57 3.29 Exceed SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No -- -- -- -- No -- -- Maximum Daily Emissions-Year 2025(2) 5.62 10.39 16.01 13.39 0.44 0 0.44 0.41 0 0.41 Exceed SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No -- -- -- -- No -- --

1. Emissions were quantified using the CalEEMod, v2022.1.1.12., computer program.

2. Maximum daily emissions assumes all activities could potentially occur simultaneously on any given day. lbs/day = pounds per day; ROG =Reactive Organic Gases; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide.

PM10 = respirable particulate matter (10 micrometers or less); PM2.5 = respirable particulate matter (2.5 micrometers or less) Refer to Appendix A for emissions modeling assumptions and results.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 713 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
19 Table 10. Quarterly Construction Emissions without Mitigation Quarter
Maximum Quarterly Emissions (tons)(1)
ROG NOx ROG+NOX
PM102 PM2.5
Exhaust Dust Total Exhaust Dust Total
Quarter 1 0.07 0.65 0.72 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.04
Quarter 2 0.1 0.98 1.08 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04
Quarter 3 0.4 0.98 1.38 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04
Quarter 4 0.4 0.98 1.38 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04
Quarter 5 0.4 0.98 1.38 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04
Quarter 6 0.02 0.01 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 SLOAPCD Quarterly Tier 1/Tier 2
Thresholds (tons/quarter) -- -- 2.5/6.3 -- 2.5/None -- 0.13/None -- -- Maximum Quarterly Emissions: 0.4 0.98 1.38 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 Exceed SLOAPCD Tier 1/Tier 2
Thresholds? -- -- No/No -- No/-- -- No/-- -- --
Maximum Quarterly Emissions: Based on construction schedule information provided and default assumptions contained in the CalEEMod computer model. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Refer to Appendix A for modeling assumptions and results.

1. Maximum quarterly emissions include on-site and off-site emissions Table 11. Summary of Construction Emissions without Mitigation Criteria Project Emissions
(lbs/day) SLOAPCD Significance Threshold Exceeds Significance Threshold?
Maximum Daily Emissions of ROG+NOX 18.8 137 lbs/day No
Maximum Daily Emissions of PM2.5 Exhaust 0.7 7 lbs/day No (tons/quarter) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 2
Maximum Quarterly Emissions of ROG+NOX 1.4 2.5 tons/quarter 6.3 tons/quarter No No Maximum Quarterly Emissions of PM10 Dust 0.07 2.5 tons/quarter None No No Maximum Quarterly Emissions of PM2.5 Exhaust 0.04 0.13 tons/quarter 0.32 tons/quarter No No Refer to Appendix A for modeling assumptions and results.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 714 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
20 Long-term Operational Emissions
Long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed project would be predominantly associated with mobile sources and area sources, such as landscape maintenance activities. To a lesser extent, emissions associated with the use of electricity and natural gas would also contribute to increased operational emissions.

Unmitigated operational emissions associated with the proposed project are summarized in Table 12. As depicted, daily operational emission from non-permitted sources would total approximately 3 lbs/day of ROG+NOx, 6 lbs/day of CO, <1 lbs/day of fugitive PM10 dust, and <0.1 lbs/day of PM2.5 exhaust. Annual operational emissions would total approximately 1 ton/year of ROG+NOx and 0.1 tons/year of fugitive PM10 dust. Predicted operational emissions would exceed SLOAPCD’s recommended ROG+NOx threshold. As a result, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Health Effects of Project-Generated Regional Emissions
Project-generated emissions are evaluated based on the pollutants potential to affect local or regional air quality. As noted earlier in this report, regional pollutants of concern typically include ozone and particulate matter. Whereas, for development projects, localized pollutants of primary concern often include carbon monoxide, TACs, as well as airborne particulates. The health effects of these pollutants are discussed earlier in this report and summarized in Table 1.

For localized pollutants, health impacts can be evaluated using screening criteria or through dispersion modeling. However, for regional pollutants such as ozone, the change in health effects associated with an individual project is a secondary pollutant created by NOX and ROG [also commonly referred to as volatile organic compounds (VOCs)]. As previously discussed earlier in this report, ozone is not a directly emitted pollutant. NOX and ROG are not criteria air pollutants but, when in the presence of sunlight, they can form ozone and also contribute to the formation of secondary PM2.5. Because ozone is not a directly emitted pollutant and is created under specific meteorological conditions over a wide transport area, ozone concentrations are typically evaluated at a regional level using complex photochemical models. These models are capable of predicting concentrations that take into account variations amounts of precursor emissions (e.g., ROG, NOX), temperature, inversions, sunlight, hourly variations, ambient conditions, and wind flow over long distances (e.g., miles). At the project level of analysis, evaluation of ozone concentrations is “not practicable and not likely [to] yield valid information” (SJVAPCD 2015).

Of the criteria pollutants identified, ozone and PM2.5 have the most critical health effects. As a result, concentrations of these pollutants are typically relied upon for determining public health effects. In comparison to modeled regional emissions, the emissions associated with most individual projects would be negligible and too small to produce a measurable change in regional ozone or PM2.5 concentrations or associated public health effects. In addition, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) has recently conducted regional emissions modeling analyses using a chemical transport model to evaluate changes in emissions and associated health effects associated with an individual project. The modeling was based on very conservative assumptions representative of the largest projects, which assumed up to approximately eight times the threshold of significance (up to 656 lbs/day) of NOX, ROG and PM. This level of emissions would be more representative of large community plan projects. Based on the modeling conducted by SMAQMD, even these large projects would have “low overall health effects” (SMAQMD 2020).

It is important to reiterate that the health effects of criteria air pollutants are taken into consideration when the U.S, EPA establishes the NAAQS for individual pollutants. The health effects of a particular pollutant are analyzed on a regional basis based on the area’s attainment of the NAAQS. As previously discussed in this report, the AQI is one common method of evaluating public health impacts for criteria air pollutants of primary concern. Local air districts establish significance thresholds that are based on evaluation of an individual project’s contribution to reginal air quality conditions and associated health effects. Based on the above discussion and given that project-generated criteria pollutants would exceed applicable significance thresholds, project-generated emissions of regional criteria pollutants (e.g., ROG, NOX, PM) could have an effect on public health. Refer to Impact AQ-C for a discussion of localized air quality impacts.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 715 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
21 Table 12. Operational Emissions without Mitigation
Operational Source
Emissions(1)
ROG NOX ROG+NOX CO
PM10 PM2.5
Exhaust Dust Total Exhaust Dust Total
Daily Emissions (lbs/day)
Mobile(2) 1.16 0.52 1.68 3.96 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 Area 1.21 0.01 1.22 1.6 < 0.005 0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0 < 0.005 Energy(3) 0.01 0.22 0.23 0.16 0.02 0 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
Water 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Waste 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Refrigerant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds -- -- 25 550 -- 25 -- 1.25 -- -- Total Daily Emissions: 2.38 0.75 3.13 5.73 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 Exceeds SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No No -- No -- No -- -- Annual Emissions (tons/year)
Total Annual Emissions: 0.42 0.14 0.56 1.06 < 0.005 0.09 0.1 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds -- -- 25 -- -- 25 -- -- -- -- Exceeds SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No -- No -- -- -- -- -- Note: Based on operational year of 2024. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Refer to Appendix A for modeling output files and assumptions.

1. Daily emissions are based on the worst case between summer and winter buildout operational condition.

2. Mobile emissions were based on trip-generation rates derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project and CalEEMod default fleet mix and trip distances.

3. Includes consistency with current building standards related to the use of energy-efficient mechanical equipment/appliances.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 716 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
22 Impact AQ-C. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? The proposed project would not result in the installation of any equipment or processes that would be considered a major emission source. However, the proposed project would result in localized increases of pollutant concentrations during project construction. The proposed project’s potential contribution to localized air pollutants is discussed, as follows:

Short-Term Construction Activities
Naturally-Occurring Asbestos
NOA has been identified as a TAC by the ARB. In accordance with ARB’s Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM), prior to any grading activities, a geologic evaluation should be conducted to determine if NOA is present within the area that will be disturbed. If NOA is not present, an exemption request form, along with a copy of the geologic report, must be filed with the SLOAPCD. If NOA is found at the site, the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM.

Based on a review of the SLOAPCD’s map depicting potential areas of NOA, the project site is not located in or near an area that has been identified as having a potential for NOA. As a result, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Localized Construction PM Concentrations
Fugitive dust emissions would be primarily associated with site preparation, grading, and vehicle travel on unpaved and paved surfaces. On-site off-road equipment and trucks would also result in short-term emissions of DPM, which could contribute to elevated localized concentration at nearby receptors. Uncontrolled emissions of fugitive dust may also contribute to potential increases in nuisance impacts to nearby receptors.

Short-term exposure to airborne particulates can result in irritation of eyes and the respiratory system and may affect sensitive individuals, including those suffering from asthma and other medical conditions. Because the project site is located within 1,000 feet of sensitive land uses, localized uncontrolled concentrations of construction-generated PM would be considered to have a potentially-significant impact.

Mitigation Measures
AQ-1: The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce construction generated fugitive dust. These measures shall be shown on grading and building plans. a. Reduce the amount of disturbed area where possible.
b. Use water trucks, SLOAPCD-approved dust suppressants (see Section 4.3 in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook), or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site and from exceeding the District’s limit of 20 percent opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any 60-minute period. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible. Please note that since water use is a concern due to drought conditions, the contractor or builder shall consider the use of an APCD-approved dust suppressant where possible to reduce the amount of water used for dust control. For a list of suppressants, see Section 4.3 of the CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
c. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily or covered with tarps or other dust barriers as needed.
d. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible.

In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
e. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between the top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 23114. f. “Track-Out” is defined as sand or soil that adheres to and/or agglomerates on the exterior surfaces of motor vehicles and/or equipment (including tires) that may then fall onto any highway or street as described in CVC Section 23113 and California Water Code 13304. To Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 717 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
23 prevent ‘track out’, designate access points and require all employees, subcontractors, and others to use them. Install and operate a ‘track-out prevention device’ where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved streets. The ‘track-out prevention device’ can be any device or combination of devices that are effective at preventing track out, located at the point of intersection of an unpaved area and a paved road. Rumble strips or steel plate devices need periodic cleaning to be effective. If paved roadways accumulate tracked out soils, the trackout prevention device may need to be modified. g. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities.
h. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established.
i. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the SLOAPCD. j. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site.
k. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads.

Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where possible. Roads shall be pre-wetted prior to sweeping when possible.
l. The burning of vegetative material shall be prohibited. Effective February 25, 2000, SLOAPCD prohibited developmental burning of vegetative material within San Luis Obispo County. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, contact the SLOAPCD Engineering & Compliance Division at (805) 781-5912.
m. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the fugitive dust emissions and enhance the implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize dust complaints, reduce visible emissions below 20 percent opacity, and to prevent the transport of dust off-site. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the SLOAPCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork or demolition.

AQ-2: The following measures shall be implemented to reduce construction emissions from on and off-road construction equipment (NOx, ROG, and DPM) and area sources. These measures shall be shown on grading and building plans:
a. Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer’s specifications. b. Heavy-duty (50 horsepower or greater) diesel-fueled construction equipment shall exceed, at a minimum, ARB's Tier 2 certified engines, or cleaner, off-road heavy-duty diesel engines and comply with State Off-Road Regulations.
c. All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle when not in use. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5-minute idling limit.
d. To the extent locally available, electrified or alternatively powered construction equipment shall be used.
e. Construction of the proposed project shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) content paints (e.g., 50 grams VOC per liter, or less).
f. To the extent locally available, use prefinished building materials or materials that do not require the application of architectural coatings.
g. Exceed California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) Tier 2 standards for reducing cement use in concrete mix as allowed by local ordinance and conditions.

Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 include SLOAPCD-recommended standard measures to reduce construction-generated emissions of fugitive dust, mobile-source emissions associated with construction vehicles and equipment, as well as, evaporative emissions from architectural coasting (e.g. low VOC-emission paint). With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 718 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
24 Impact AQ-D. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
The occurrence and severity of odor impacts depend on numerous factors, including the nature, frequency, and intensity of the source; wind speed and direction; and the sensitivity of the receptors. While offensive odors rarely cause any physical harm, they still can be very unpleasant, leading to considerable distress among the public and often generating citizen complaints to local governments and regulatory agencies.

Projects with the potential to frequently expose members of the public to objectionable odors would be deemed to have a significant impact.

The proposed project would not result in the installation of any equipment or processes that would be considered major odor-emission sources. In addition, no known odor sources are within one mile of the project site. However, construction of the proposed project would involve the use of a variety of gasoline or diesel-powered equipment that would emit exhaust fumes. Exhaust fumes, particularly diesel-exhaust, may be considered objectionable by some people. In addition, pavement coatings and architectural coatings used during project construction would also emit temporary odors. However, construction-generated emissions would occur intermittently throughout the workday and would dissipate rapidly with increasing distance from the source. Mitigation measures, such as implementation of idling restrictions for construction equipment and vehicles and use of newer, cleaner equipment and vehicles would further reduce construction-generated emissions. For these reasons, short-term construction activities would not expose a substantial number of people to frequent odorous emissions. For these reasons, potential exposure of sensitive receptors to odorous emissions would be considered less than significant.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 719 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
25 GREENHOUSE GASES AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Existing Setting
To fully understand global climate change, it is important to recognize the naturally occurring “greenhouse effect” and to define the GHGs that contribute to this phenomenon. Various gases in the earth’s atmosphere, classified as atmospheric GHGs, play a critical role in determining the earth’s surface temperature. Solar radiation enters the earth’s atmosphere from space and a portion of the radiation is absorbed by the earth’s surface. The earth emits this radiation back toward space, but the properties of the radiation change from high-frequency solar radiation to lower-frequency infrared radiation. GHGs, which are transparent to solar radiation, are effective in absorbing infrared radiation. As a result, this radiation that otherwise would have escaped back into space is now retained, resulting in a warming of the atmosphere. This phenomenon is known as the greenhouse effect. Among the prominent GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride.

Primary GHGs attributed to global climate change, are discussed, as follows:
• Carbon Dioxide. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a colorless, odorless gas. CO2 is emitted in a number of ways, both naturally and through human activities. The largest source of CO2 emissions globally is the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and gas in power plants, automobiles, industrial facilities, and other sources. A number of specialized industrial production processes and product uses such as mineral production, metal production, and the use of petroleum-based products can also lead to CO2 emissions. The atmospheric lifetime of CO2 is variable because it is so readily exchanged in the atmosphere (U.S. EPA 2018).
• Methane. Methane (CH4) is a colorless, odorless gas that is not flammable under most circumstances.

CH4 is the major component of natural gas, about 87 percent by volume. It is also formed and released to the atmosphere by biological processes occurring in anaerobic environments. Methane is emitted from a variety of both human-related and natural sources. Human-related sources include fossil fuel production, animal husbandry (enteric fermentation in livestock and manure management), rice cultivation, biomass burning, and waste management. These activities release significant quantities of CH4 into the atmosphere. Natural sources of methane include wetlands, gas hydrates, permafrost, termites, oceans, freshwater bodies, non-wetland soils, and other sources such as wildfires. Methane’s atmospheric lifetime is about 12 years (U.S. EPA 2018). • Nitrous Oxide. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a clear, colorless gas with a slightly sweet odor. N2O is produced by both natural and human-related sources. Primary human-related sources of N2O are agricultural soil management, animal manure management, sewage treatment, mobile and stationary combustion of fossil fuels, acid production, and nitric acid production. N2O is also produced naturally from a wide variety of biological sources in soil and water, particularly microbial action in wet tropical forests. The atmospheric lifetime of N2O is approximately 114 years (U.S. EPA 2018). • Hydrofluorocarbons. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are man-made chemicals, many of which have been developed as alternatives to ozone-depleting substances for industrial, commercial, and consumer products. The only significant emissions of HFCs before 1990 were of the chemical HFC-23, which is generated as a byproduct of the production of HCFC-22 (or Freon 22, used in air conditioning applications). The atmospheric lifetime for HFCs varies from just over a year for HFC152a to 270 years for HFC-23. Most of the commercially used HFCs have atmospheric lifetimes of less than 15 years (e.g., HFC-134a, which is used in automobile air conditioning and refrigeration, has an atmospheric life of 14 years) (U.S. EPA 2018).
• Perfluorocarbons. Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) are colorless, highly dense, chemically inert, and nontoxic. There are seven PFC gases: perfluoromethane (CF4), perfluoroethane (C2F6), perfluoropropane (C3F8), perfluorobutane (C4F10), perfluorocyclobutane (C4F8), perfluoropentane (C5F12), and perfluorohexane (C6F14). Natural geological emissions have been responsible for the PFCs that have accumulated in the atmosphere in the past; however, the largest current source is aluminum production, which releases CF4 and C2F6 as byproducts. The estimated atmospheric lifetimes for PFCs ranges from 2,600 to 50,000 years (U.S. EPA 2018).

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 720 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
26 • Nitrogen Trifluoride. Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) is an inorganic, colorless, odorless, toxic, nonflammable gas used as an etchant in microelectronics. NF3 is predominantly employed in the cleaning of the plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition chambers in the production of liquid crystal displays and silicon-based thin-film solar cells. It has a global warming potential of 16,100 CO2e. While NF3 may have a lower global warming potential than other chemical etchants, it is still a potent GHG. In 2009, NF3 was listed by California as a high (global warming potential) GWP GHG to be listed and regulated under AB 32 (Section 38505 Health and Safety Code). • Sulfur Hexafluoride. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is an inorganic compound that is colorless, odorless, nontoxic, and generally non-flammable. SF6 is primarily used as an electrical insulator in high voltage equipment. The electric power industry uses roughly 80 percent of all SF6 produced worldwide. Leaks of SF6 occur from aging equipment and during equipment maintenance and servicing. SF6 has an atmospheric life of 3,200 years (U.S. EPA 2018).
• Black Carbon. Black carbon is the strongest light-absorbing component of PM emitted from burning fuels such as coal, diesel, and biomass. Black carbon contributes to climate change both directly by absorbing sunlight and indirectly by depositing on snow and by interacting with clouds and affecting cloud formation. Black carbon is considered a short-lived species, which can vary spatially and, consequently, it is very difficult to quantify associated global-warming potentials. The main sources of black carbon in California are wildfires, off-road vehicles (locomotives, marine vessels, tractors, excavators, dozers, etc.), on-road vehicles (cars, trucks, and buses), fireplaces, agricultural waste burning, and prescribed burning (planned burns of forest or wildlands) (U.S. EPA 2018).

Each GHG differs in its ability to absorb heat in the atmosphere based on the lifetime, or persistence, of the gas molecule in the atmosphere. Often, estimates of GHG emissions are presented in CO2e, which weighs each gas by its GWP. Expressing GHG emissions in CO2e takes the contribution of all GHG emissions to the greenhouse effect and converts them to a single unit equivalent to the effect that would occur if only CO2 were being emitted. Table 13 provides a summary of the GWP for GHG emissions of typical concern with regard to community development projects, based on a 100-year time horizon. As indicated, Methane traps over 25 times more heat per molecule than CO2, and N2O absorbs roughly 298 times more heat per molecule than CO2. Additional GHG with high GWP includes NF3, SF6, PFCs, and black carbon.

Table 13. Global Warming Potential for Greenhouse Gases Greenhouse Gas Global Warming Potential (100-year)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 1
Methane (CH4) 25
Nitrous Dioxide (N2O) 298
Based on IPCC GWP values for 100-year time horizon.

Source: IPCC 2007
Statewide GHG Emissions
In 2019, GHG emissions within California totaled 418.1 MMT of CO2e. GHG emissions, by sector, are summarized in Figure 3. Within California, the transportation sector is the largest contributor, accounting for approximately 39.7 percent of the total state-wide GHG emissions. Emissions associated with industrial uses are the second-largest contributor, totaling roughly 21.1 percent. Electricity generation totaled roughly 14.1 percent. Other major emission sources included commercial uses, residential uses, agriculture, refrigerants, and waste (ARB 2022).

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 721 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
27 Figure 3. California GHG Emissions Inventory by Sector & Subsector (2019) Source: ARB 2022
City of Paso Robles GHG Emissions Inventories
The City has completed a community-wide inventory of GHG emissions for years 2005 and 2020, which are summarized in Table 14. As shown, a majority of the City’s emissions are associated with mobile sources.

Remaining GHG emissions are predominantly associated with energy use and solid waste generation. In comparison to year 2005 community-wide emissions, year 2016 metric tons (MT)CO2e emissions decreased by a total of approximately 20 percent (City of Paso Robles 2013).

Attachment 3
Ot 0
Cement 1.9
Thermal Cogen 1.8%
Refineries 6.9%
,., ... t )
Passenger Ve hides 28.5'!4
Crops 1.6%
Other Fuel Use 0.6%
Refriger anl5 4.5~
Other D.59'
Waste 2 1%
Exhibit A

Page 722 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
28 Table 14. City of Paso Robles GHG Emissions Inventories Sector
Year 2005
(MTCO2e)
Year 2020
(MTCO2e)
Percent Change from
2005 to 2020
Residential 40,188 46,828 17%
Commercial/Industrial 33,536 30,551 -9%
Transportation 67,801 92,913 37%
Off-Road 13,205 15,878 20%
Solid Waste 13,343 16,653 17%
Wastewater 70 82 17%
Aircraft 1,324 1,543 17%
Total 169,557 203,448 20%
MTCO2e = Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
Source: City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan 2013
Short-Lived Climate Pollutants
Short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs), such as black carbon, fluorinated gases, and methane also have a dramatic effect on climate change. Though short-lived, these pollutants create a warming influence on the climate that is many times more potent than that of carbon dioxide.

As part of the ARB’s efforts to address SLCPs, the ARB has developed a statewide emission inventory for black carbon. The black carbon inventory will help support the implementation of the SLCP Strategy, but it is not part of the State’s GHG Inventory that tracks progress towards the State’s climate targets. The most recent inventory for year 2013 conditions is depicted in Figure 4. As depicted, off-road mobile sources account for a majority of black carbon emissions totaling roughly 36 percent of the inventory. Other major anthropogenic sources of black carbon include on-road transportation, residential wood burning, fuel combustion, and industrial processes (ARB 2020).

Figure 4. California Black Carbon Emissions Inventory (Year 2013) Source: ARB 2020
Effects of Global Climate Change
There are uncertainties as to exactly what the climate changes will be in various local areas of the earth.

There are also uncertainties associated with the magnitude and timing of other consequences of a warmer planet: sea-level rise, spread of certain diseases out of their usual geographic range, the effect on agricultural production, water supply, sustainability of ecosystems, increased strength and frequency of storms, extreme heat events, increased air pollution episodes, and the consequence of these effects on the economy.

Attachment 3
18% On-Road Diesel
' 36% Off-Road Mobile
115% Fireplaces & Woodstoves
14% Fuel Combust ion/Industrial
6% Miscelaneous
4% Commercial Cooking
% Agricultural Burning
o On-Road Bralce & Tire
4% On-Road Gasoline
Exhibit A

Page 723 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
29 Within California, climate changes would likely alter the ecological characteristics of many ecosystems throughout the state. Such alterations would likely include increases in surface temperatures and changes in the form, timing, and intensity of precipitation. For instance, historical records are depicting an increasing trend toward earlier snowmelt in the Sierra Nevada. This snowpack is a principal supply of water for the state, providing roughly 50 percent of the state’s annual runoff. If this trend continues, some areas of the state may experience an increased danger of floods during the winter months and possible exhaustion of the snowpack during spring and summer months. Earlier snowmelt would also impact the State’s energy resources.

Currently, approximately 20 percent of California's electricity comes from hydropower. Early exhaustion of the Sierra snowpack may force electricity producers to switch to more costly or non-renewable forms of electricity generation during spring and summer months. A changing climate may also impact agricultural crop yields, coastal structures, and biodiversity. As a result, changes in climate will likely have detrimental effects on some of California’s largest industries, including agriculture, wine, tourism, skiing, recreational and commercial fishing, and forestry.

Regulatory Framework
Federal
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13514
Executive Order 13514 is focused on reducing GHGs internally in federal agency missions, programs, and operations. In addition, the executive order directs federal agencies to participate in the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, which is engaged in developing a national strategy for adaptation to climate change.

On April 2, 2007, in Massachusetts v. U.S. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007), the Supreme Court found that GHGs are air pollutants covered by the FCAA and that the U.S. EPA has the authority to regulate GHG. The Court held that the U.S. EPA Administrator must determine whether or not emissions of GHGs from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, or whether the science is too uncertain to make a reasoned decision.

On December 7, 2009, the U.S. EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings regarding GHGs under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act:
• Endangerment Finding: The Administrator found that the current and projected concentrations of the six key well-mixed GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6) in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. • Cause or Contribute Finding: The Administrator found that the combined emissions of these wellmixed GHGs from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution which threatens public health and welfare.

Although these findings did not themselves impose any requirements on industry or other entities, this action was a prerequisite to finalizing the U.S. EPA’s Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Light-Duty Vehicles, which was published on September 15, 2009. On May 7, 2010, the final Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards was published in the Federal Register.

The U.S. EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are taking coordinated steps to enable the production of a new generation of clean vehicles with reduced GHG emissions and improved fuel efficiency from on-road vehicles and engines. These next steps include developing the first-ever GHG regulations for heavy-duty engines and vehicles, as well as additional light-duty vehicle GHG regulations.

These steps were outlined by President Obama in a Presidential Memorandum on May 21, 2010.

The final combined U.S. EPA and NHTSA standards that make up the first phase of this national program apply to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles, covering model years 2012 through 2016. The standards require these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of CO2 per mile (the equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon if the automobile industry were to meet this CO2 level solely through fuel economy improvements). Together, these standards will cut GHG emissions Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 724 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
30 by an estimated 960 MMT and 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program (model years 2012-2016). On August 28, 2012, U.S. EPA and NHTSA issued their joint rule to extend this national program of coordinated GHG and fuel economy standards to model years 2017 through 2025 passenger vehicles.

State
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. S-3-05
Executive Order S-3-05 (State of California) proclaims that California is vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. It declares that increased temperatures could reduce the Sierra’s snowpack, further exacerbate California’s air quality problems, and potentially cause a rise in sea levels. To combat those concerns, the Executive Order established total GHG emission targets. Specifically, emissions are to be reduced to the 2000 level by 2010, to the 1990 level by 2020, and to 80 percent below the 1990 level by 2050.

The Executive Order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to coordinate a multi-agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. The secretary will also submit biannual reports to the governor and state legislature describing (1) progress made toward reaching the emission targets, (2) impacts of global warming on California’s resources, and (3) mitigation and adaptation plans to combat these impacts. To comply with the Executive Order, the secretary of CalEPA created a Climate Action Team made up of members from various state agencies and commissions. The Climate Action Team released its first report in March 2006 and continues to release periodic reports on progress. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on voluntary actions of California businesses, local government, and community actions, as well as through state incentive and regulatory programs.

ASSEMBLY BILL 32 - CALIFORNIA GLOBAL WARMING SOLUTIONS ACT OF 2006 AB 32 (Health and Safety Code Sections 38500, 38501, 28510, 38530, 38550, 38560, 38561–38565, 38570, 38571, 38574, 38580, 38590, 38592–38599) requires that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. The gases that are regulated by AB 32 include CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, NF3, and SF6. The reduction to 1990 levels will be accomplished through an enforceable statewide cap on GHG emissions that will be phased in starting in 2012. To effectively implement the cap, AB 32 directs ARB to develop and implement regulations to reduce statewide GHG emissions from stationary sources. AB 32 specifies that regulations adopted in response to AB 1493 should be used to address GHG emissions from vehicles.

However, AB 32 also includes language stating that if the AB 1493 regulations cannot be implemented, then ARB should develop new regulations to control vehicle GHG emissions under the authorization of AB 32.

AB 32 requires that ARB adopt a quantified cap on GHG emissions representing 1990 emissions levels and disclose how it arrives at the cap, institute a schedule to meet the emissions cap, and develop tracking, reporting, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that the state achieves reductions in GHG emissions necessary to meet the cap. AB 32 also includes guidance to institute emissions reductions in an economically efficient manner and conditions to ensure that businesses and consumers are not unfairly affected by the reductions.

CLIMATE CHANGE SCOPING PLAN
In October 2008, ARB published its Climate Change Proposed Scoping Plan, which is the State’s plan to achieve GHG reductions in California required by AB 32. This initial Scoping Plan contained the main strategies to be implemented in order to achieve the target emission levels identified in AB 32. The Scoping Plan included ARB-recommended GHG reductions for each emissions sector of the state’s GHG inventory.

The largest proposed GHG reduction recommendations were associated with improving emissions standards for light-duty vehicles, implementing the Low Carbon Fuel Standard program, implementation of energy efficiency measures in buildings and appliances, and the widespread development of combined heat and power systems, and developing a renewable portfolio standard for electricity production.

The Scoping Plan states that land use planning and urban growth decisions will play important roles in the state’s GHG reductions because local governments have primary authority to plan, zone, approve, and permit how land is developed to accommodate population growth and the changing needs of their jurisdictions. ARB further acknowledges that decisions on how land is used will have large impacts on the GHG emissions that will result from the transportation, housing, industry, forestry, water, agriculture, electricity, Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 725 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
31 and natural gas emissions sectors. With regard to land use planning, the Scoping Plan expects approximately

5.0 MMTCO2e would be achieved with the implementation of SB 375, which is discussed further below.

The initial Scoping Plan was first approved by ARB on December 11, 2008, and is updated every five years.

The first update of the Scoping Plan was approved by the ARB on May 22, 2014, which looked past 2020 to set mid-term goals (2030-2035) on the road to reaching the 2050 goals., The most recent update released by ARB is the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, which was released on November 2017. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan incorporates strategies for achieving the 2030 GHG-reduction target established in SB 32 and Executive Order B-30-15. Most notably, the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan encourages zero net increases in GHG emissions. However, the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan recognizes that achieving net zero increases in GHG emissions may not be possible or appropriate for all projects and that the inability of a project to mitigate its GHG emissions to zero would not imply the project results in a substantial contribution to the cumulatively significant environmental impact of climate change under CEQA.

The 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan update is currently being prepared. The 2022 Scoping Plan Update will assess progress towards achieving the SB 32 year 2030 target and will lay out a path to achieve carbon neutrality by mid-century.

SENATE BILL 1078 AND GOVERNOR’S ORDER S-14-08
SB 1078 (Public Utilities Code Sections 387, 390.1, 399.25 and Article 16) addresses electricity supply and requires that retail sellers of electricity, including investor-owned utilities and community choice aggregators, provide a minimum 20 percent of their supply from renewable sources by 2017. This Senate Bill will affect statewide GHG emissions associated with electricity generation. In 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-14-08, which set the Renewables Portfolio Standard target to 33 percent by 2020. It directed state government agencies and retail sellers of electricity to take all appropriate actions to implement this target. Executive Order S-14-08 was later superseded by Executive Order S-21-09 on September 15, 2009. Executive Order S-21-09 directed the ARB to adopt regulations requiring 33 percent of electricity sold in the State come from renewable energy by 2020. Statute SB X1-2 superseded this Executive Order in 2011, which obligated all California electricity providers, including investor-owned utilities and publicly owned utilities, to obtain at least 33 percent of their energy from renewable electrical generation facilities by 2020.

ARB is required by current law, AB 32 of 2006, to regulate sources of GHGs to meet a state goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and an 80 percent reduction of 1990 levels by 2050. The California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission serve in advisory roles to help ARB develop the regulations to administer the 33 percent by 2020 requirement. ARB is also authorized to increase the target and accelerate and expand the time frame.

MANDATORY REPORTING OF GHG EMISSIONS
The California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32, 2006) requires the reporting of GHGs by major sources to the ARB. Major sources required to report GHG emissions include industrial facilities, suppliers of transportation fuels, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied petroleum gas, and carbon dioxide, operators of petroleum and natural gas systems, and electricity retail providers and marketers.

CAP-AND-TRADE REGULATION
The cap-and-trade regulation is a key element in California’s climate plan. It sets a statewide limit on sources responsible for 85 percent of California’s GHG emissions and establishes a price signal needed to drive longterm investment in cleaner fuels and more efficient use of energy. The cap-and-trade rules came into effect on January 1, 2013, and apply to large electric power plants and large industrial plants. In 2015, fuel distributors, including distributors of heating and transportation fuels, also became subject to the cap-andtrade rules. At that stage, the program will encompass around 360 businesses throughout California and nearly 85 percent of the state’s total GHG emissions.

Under the cap-and-trade regulation, companies must hold enough emission allowances to cover their emissions and are free to buy and sell allowances on the open market. California held its first auction of GHG allowances on November 14, 2012. California’s GHG cap-and-trade system is projected to reduce GHG Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 726 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
32 emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 and would achieve an approximate 80 percent reduction from 1990 levels by 2050.

SENATE BILL 32
SB 32 was signed by Governor Brown on September 8, 2016. SB 32 effectively extends California’s GHG emission-reduction goals from year 2020 to year 2030. This new emission-reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is intended to promote further GHG-reductions in support of the State’s ultimate goal of reducing GHG emissions by 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. SB 32 also directs the ARB to update the Climate Change Scoping Plan to address this interim 2030 emission-reduction target.

SENATE BILL 97
SB 97 was enacted in 2007. SB 97 required the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop, and the Natural Resources Agency to adopt, amendments to the CEQA Guidelines addressing the analysis and mitigation of GHG emissions. Those CEQA Guidelines amendments clarified several points, including the following:
• Lead agencies must analyze the GHG emissions of proposed projects and must reach a conclusion regarding the significance of those emissions.
• When a project’s GHG emissions may be significant, lead agencies must consider a range of potential mitigation measures to reduce those emissions. • Lead agencies must analyze potentially significant impacts associated with placing projects in hazardous locations, including locations potentially affected by climate change. • Lead agencies may significantly streamline the analysis of GHGs on a project level by using a programmatic GHG emissions reduction plan meeting certain criteria. • CEQA mandates analysis of a proposed project’s potential energy use (including transportationrelated energy), sources of energy supply and ways to reduce energy demand, including through the use of efficient transportation alternatives.

As part of the administrative rulemaking process, the California Natural Resources Agency developed a Final Statement of Reasons explaining the legal and factual bases, intent, and purpose of the CEQA Guidelines amendments. The amendments to the CEQA Guidelines implementing SB 97 became effective on March 18, 2010.

SENATE BILL 100
SB 100 was signed by Governor Jerry Brown on September 10, 2018. SB 100 sets a goal of phasing out all fossil fuels from the state’s electricity sector by 2045. SB 100 increases to 60 percent, from 50 percent, how much of California’s electricity portfolio must come from renewables by 2030. It establishes a further goal to have an electric grid that is entirely powered by clean energy by 2045, which could include other carbon-free sources, like nuclear power, that are not renewable.

SENATE BILL 375
SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) or alternative planning strategy (APS) that will address land-use allocation in that MPOs regional transportation plan. ARB, in consultation with MPOs, establishes regional reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. ARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO’s SCS or APS for consistency with its assigned targets. If MPOs do not meet the GHG reduction targets, funding for transportation projects may be withheld. In 2018, ARB adopted updated SB 375 targets.

SENATE BILLS 1383 & 1206
SB 1383 requires California to reduce HFC emissions associated with the use of refrigerants to 40 percent below 2013 levels by 2030. Starting in 2022, new facilities will be required to use refrigerants that can reduce their emissions by up to 90 percent. The intent of the new rules is to eliminate the use of very high-GWP refrigerants in every sector that uses non-residential refrigeration systems. Compliance begins for Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 727 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
33 most home air conditioning equipment in 2025. Senate Bill 1206, signed into law in September 2022, prohibits the sale or distribution of HFCs that exceed a specified GWP. Under this new law, refrigerants would not be allowed to exceed 2,200 GWP beginning January 1, 2025; 1,500 GWP beginning January 1, 2030; and, 750 GWP beginning January 1, 2030. California Building Code The CBC contains standards that regulate the method of use, properties, performance, or types of materials used in the construction, alteration, improvement, repair, or rehabilitation of a building or other improvement to real property. The California Building Code is adopted every three years by the Building Standards Commission (BSC). In the interim, the BSC also adopts annual updates to make necessary mid-term corrections. The CBC standards apply statewide; however, a local jurisdiction may amend a CBC standard if it makes a finding that the amendment is reasonably necessary due to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions.

CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
In essence, green buildings standards are indistinguishable from any other building standards, are contained in the CBC, and regulate the construction of new buildings and improvements. Whereas the focus of traditional building standards has been protecting public health and safety, the focus of green building standards is to improve environmental performance.

The 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (2019 Standards), adopted in May 2018, addressed four key areas: smart residential photovoltaic systems, updated thermal envelope standards (preventing heat transfer from the interior to the exterior and vice versa), residential and nonresidential ventilation requirements, and non-residential lighting requirements. The 2019 Standards required new residential and non-residential construction; as well as major alterations to existing structures, to include EV-capable parking spaces which have electrical panel capacity and conduit to accommodate future installation. In addition, the 2019 Standards also required the installation of PV systems for low-rise residential dwellings, defined as single-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings up to three-stories in height. These requirements are based on various factors, including the floor area of the home, sun exposure, and climate zone. Under the 2019 standards, nonresidential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy due mainly to lighting upgrades (CEC 2018).

Depending on the land use and other factors, solar systems should be sized to meet targets of up to 60 percent of the structure’s loads. These new solar requirements will become effective January 1, 2023, and contribute to California’s goal of reaching net-zero carbon footprint by 2045 (CEC 2022).

SHORT-LIVED CLIMATE POLLUTANT REDUCTION STRATEGY
In March 2017, the ARB adopted the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy (SLCP Strategy) establishing a path to decrease GHG emissions and displace fossil-based natural gas use. Strategies include avoiding landfill methane emissions by reducing the disposal of organics through edible food recovery, composting, in-vessel digestion, and other processes; and recovering methane from wastewater treatment facilities, and manure methane at dairies, and using the methane as a renewable source of natural gas to fuel vehicles or generate electricity. The SLCP Strategy also identifies steps to reduce natural gas leaks from oil and gas wells, pipelines, valves, and pumps to improve safety, avoid energy losses, and reduce methane emissions associated with natural gas use. Lastly, the SLCP Strategy also identifies measures that can reduce HFC emissions at national and international levels, in addition to State-level action that includes an incentive program to encourage the use of low-GWP refrigerants, and limitations on the use of high-GWP refrigerants in new refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment (ARB 2017).

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District
SLOAPCD is a local public agency with the primary mission of realizing and preserving clean air for all county residents and businesses. Responsibilities of the SLOAPCD include, but are not limited to, preparing plans for Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 728 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
34 the attainment of ambient air quality standards, adopting and enforcing rules and regulations concerning sources of air pollution, issuing permits for stationary sources of air pollution, inspecting stationary sources of air pollution and responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, and implementing programs and regulations required by federal and state regulatory requirements.

City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan
The City’s Climate Action Plan is a long-range plan to reduce GHG emissions from City government operations and community activities. The Climate Action Plan will also help achieve multiple community goals such as lowering energy costs, reducing air pollution, and supporting local economic development.

The Climate Action Plan includes measures to reduce community-wide GHG emissions by 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 (City of Paso Robles 2013).

County of San Luis Obispo 2019 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
The 2019 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) was adopted by the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) Board in June 2019. The RTP includes the region's SCS, which outlines how the region will exceed its GHG reduction targets as required by SB 375 through the promotion of a variety of transportation demand management & system management tools and techniques to maximize the efficiency of the transportation network. Consistency with the requirement of SB 375 ensures consistency with the GHG-reduction targets set by ARB. The 2019 SCS was found to be consistent with the requirement of SB 375 and is also consistent with the general plans of the region’s jurisdictions (SLOCOG 2019).

Impact Analysis
Thresholds of Significance
In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, increased GHG emissions associated with the implementation of the proposed project would be considered significant if it would:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.

The SLOAPCD’s currently recommended CEQA GHG significance thresholds are based on AB 32 year 2020 GHG-reduction goals. The SLOAPCD is currently in the process of updating their recommended CEQA GHG significance thresholds to reflect the State’s future year GHG-reduction goals, including year 2030 GHGreductions required by SB 32. Similarly, the City’s currently adopted Climate Action Plan is also based on year 2020 GHG-reduction goals and has not been updated to reflect the State’s future year GHG reduction goals.

This analysis provides a discussion of consistency with the currently adopted City Climate Action Plan; however, consistency with year 2030 GHG reductions, per SB 32, and the State’s Scoping Plan have been evaluated using an efficiency threshold, taking into account the City’s 2030 GHG-reduction target mandated by SB 32 and the City’s baseline GHG inventory, as identified in the City’s existing Climate Action Plan. The GHG-efficiency threshold was calculated by dividing the GHG emissions inventory goal (allowable emissions), by the City’s estimated service population (SP) for year 2030 conditions. The SP includes estimated population and employment for the City. Emissions sectors that do not apply to the proposed project (i.e., agriculture) were excluded from the calculation. The GHG emissions inventory for the land use sectors applicable to the proposed project were then divided by the projected SP for future year 2030. The methodology used for quantification of the target efficiency threshold applied to the proposed project is summarized in Table 15. Accordingly, project-generated GHG emissions that would exceed the efficiency threshold of 1.9 MT CO2e/SP/year in 2030 would be considered to have a potentially significant impact on the environment that could conflict with GHG-reduction planning efforts. To be conservative, amortized construction-generated GHG emissions were included in annual operational GHG emissions estimates for Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 729 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
35 comparison to this threshold, consistent with SLOAPCD-recommended methodologies. For informational purposes, opening year GHG emissions were also presented.

Table 15. Project-Level GHG Efficiency Threshold Calculation Operational Year 2030
Land Use Sectors GHG Emissions Target(1) 100,940
Population(2) 37,700
Employment(3) 16,017
Service Population (SP) 53,717
GHG Efficiency Threshold (MTCO2e/SP/year) 1.9
Note: Employment data for interim years are estimated based on proportionality with population trends based on historical data.

1. Based on Business-as-Usual (year 2005) emissions inventory and the State’s target reductions of 40% below BAU baseline GHG emissions inventory by 2030. Emissions inventory reflects locally-appropriate emissions sectors.

2. Based on population data derived from the City of Paso Robles Demographic website. Website url:
https://www.prcity.com/244/Demographics.

3. Based on employment data derived from the California Employment Development Department. Labor Force and Unemployment Rates for Cities and Census Designated Places. Website url: https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/labor-force-and-unemploymentfor-cities-and-census-areas.html.

Methodology
Emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project were calculated using the CalEEMod, version 2022.1.1.12, computer program. Project construction is anticipated to occur over an approximately 14-to-16-month period beginning in July 2024. Construction phase durations were based provided information. No existing structure would be demolished. Based on information provided by the project proponent approximately 750 cubic yards of fill would be exported. Additional construction information such as off-road equipment use, worker vehicle trips, and equipment load factors were based on default parameters contained in the model. Modeling assumptions and output files are included in Appendix A of this report.

Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Impact GHG-A. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of CO2 from mobile sources. To a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as CH4 and N2O, would also be generated. Short-term and long-term GHG emissions associated with the development of the proposed project are discussed in greater detail, as follows:

Short-term Construction GHG Emissions
Estimated increases in GHG emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project are summarized in Table 16. Based on the modeling conducted, construction-related GHG emissions would total approximately 249 MTCO2e. Amortized GHG emissions, when averaged over the assumed 30-year minimum life of the project, would total approximately 10 MTCO2e/year. There would also be a small amount of GHG emissions from waste generated during construction; however, this amount is speculative. Actual emissions may vary, depending on the final construction schedules, equipment required, and activities conducted.

Amortized construction-generated GHG emissions are included in the operational GHG emissions impact discussion provided below.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 730 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
36 Table 16. Construction-Generated GHG Emissions without Mitigation Construction Year
GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e/Year)
2024 96.2
2025 153
Total Construction Emissions: 249.2
Amortized Construction Emissions: 10.0
Amortized emissions are quantified based on a minimum 30-year project life. Refer to Appendix A for modeling assumptions and results.

Long-term Operational GHG Emissions
Estimated long-term increases in GHG emissions associated with the proposed project for future year 2030 conditions are summarized in Table 17. For informational purposes, opening year 2024 emissions were also calculated and included in Table 17. As depicted, operational GHG emissions for the proposed project, with the inclusion of amortized construction GHGs, would total approximately 186 MTCO2e /year under operational year 2030 conditions. A majority of the operational GHG emissions would be associated with motor vehicle use, energy use, and refrigerant. To a lesser extent, operational GHG emissions would also be associated with solid waste generation and water use. As depicted in Table 17, total emissions would equate to 7.8 MTCO2e/SP, which would exceed the significance threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP. As a result, this impact is considered potentially significant.

Table 17. Operational GHG Emissions without Mitigation
Operational Year/Source
GHG Emissions (MTCO2e/Year)
Opening
Year 2024
Future
Year 2030
Mobile(1) 108 98.9
Area Source(2) 0.89 0.89
Energy Source 62.8 62.8
Water(3) 1.64 1.64
Waste(4) 5.58 5.58
Refrigerants
(5) 6.03 6.03
Amortized Construction Emissions: 10.0 10.0
Total Emissions: 195 186
Total MTCO2e/SP(6): 7.8
GHG Efficiency Significance Threshold: 1.9
Exceeds Threshold? Yes

1. Based on default fleet mix and trip distances contained in CalEEMod for San Luis Obispo County.

2. Area source includes emissions associated primarily with the use of landscape maintenance equipment.

3. Includes use of low-flow water fixtures and water-efficient irrigation systems, per current building code requirements.

4. Based on an average annual waste diversion/recycling rate of 50% based on statewide averages.

5. Includes compliance with regulatory requirements for refrigerants (e.g., SB 1383 & 1206).

6. Based on the estimate of 10 employees and 12 residents.

Refer to Appendix A for modeling assumptions and results.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 731 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
37 Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation Measure GHG-1.

GHG-1: A GHG-Reduction Plan shall be prepared for the proposed project. The GHG-Reduction Plan shall include all possible on-site GHG reduction measures sufficient to reduce operational emissions to below the applicable annual operational GHG significance threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP or the GHG significance threshold adopted by either the SLOAPCD or the City at the time the GHG-Reduction Plan is prepared. The GHG-reduction plan shall be approved by the City prior to issuance of building construction permits. At a minimum, GHG-reduction plan shall include the following measures:
a. To the extent possible, install electrically powered appliances and building mechanical equipment in place of natural-gas fueled equipment. If natural gas equipment is to be installed, electrical service for the equipment location shall also be provided sufficient to allow for the future conversion from natural gas to electrical service. b. Exceed current CALGreen Tier 2 standards for EV parking spaces, to the extent applicable to the project, except that all EV parking spaces required by the code shall be “EV-capable” instead of “EV-ready”.
c. The Project shall provide organic waste pick up and shall provide the appropriate on-site enclosures consistent with the provisions of the City of Paso Robles Development Standards for Solid Waste Services.
d. Exceed CalGreen building standards at the time of development for water conservation (e.g. use of low flow water fixtures, water efficient irrigation systems, and draught tolerant landscaping.)
Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4, subdivisions (c)(3) and (c)(4), respectively, a project’s GHG emissions can be reduced by off-site measures, including offsets that are not otherwise required and measures that sequester GHGs. In the event that feasible on-site GHG-reduction measures are insufficient to reduce operational GHG emissions to below the GHG threshold of significance, offsite mitigation measures may be included. Off-site mitigation measures may include “Direct Reduction Activities” or the purchase of “Carbon Offset Credits” and discussed further, as follows:

Direct Reduction Activities
Directly undertake or fund activities that will reduce or sequester GHG emissions. GHG reduction credits shall achieve GHG emission reductions that are real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, enforceable, in accordance with the criteria set forth in the ARB’s most recent Process for the Review and Approval of Compliance Offset Protocols in Support of the Cap-and-Trade Regulation (2013). GHG reduction credits shall be undertaken for the specific purpose of reduction projectgenerated GHG emissions and shall not include reductions that would otherwise be required by law. All Direct Reduction Activities and associated reduction credits shall be confirmed by an independent, qualified third-party.

The “Direct Reduction Activity” shall be registered with an ARB-approved registry and in compliance with ARB-approved protocols. In accordance with the applicable Registry requirements, the Project applicant (or its designee) shall retain an independent, qualified thirdparty to confirm the GHG emissions reduction or sequestration achieved by the Direct GHG Reduction Activities against the applicable Registry protocol or methodology. The Project applicant (or its designee) will then apply for issuance of carbon credits in accordance with the applicable Registry rules.

Carbon Offsets
Obtain and retire “Carbon Offsets.” Carbon Offsets shall achieve GHG reductions that are real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, and enforceable. Carbon offsets shall be purchased from ARBapproved registries and shall comply with ARB-approved protocols to ensure that offset credits accurately and reliably represent actual emissions reductions. If the purchase of carbon offsets is Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 732 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
38 selected, offsets shall be purchased according to the City of Paso Robles’ preference, which is, in order of City preference: (1) within the City of Paso Robles; (2) within the County of San Luis Obispo; (3) within the State of California; then (4) elsewhere in the United States. In the event that a project or program providing offsets to the project applicant loses its accreditation, the project applicant shall comply with the rules and procedures of retiring offsets specific to the registry involved and shall purchase an equivalent number of credits to recoup the loss.

Significance After Mitigation
Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would require the preparation of a GHG-Reduction Plan which would include measures sufficient to reduce project-generated GHG emissions to below the applicable CEQA GHG significance thresholds. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Impact GHG-B Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
As noted in Table 21, operational GHG emissions attributable to the proposed project would be primarily associated with mobile sources. Applicable GHG-reduction plans related to reducing operational GHG emissions include the City’s Climate Action Plan, the County of San Luis Obispo’s RTP/SCS, and California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. The project’s consistency with these plans is discussed in greater detail, as follows:

City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan
The City’s Climate Action Plan is a long-range plan to reduce GHG emissions from City government operations and community activities within the community. The City’s Climate Action Plan includes numerous measures to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy use, motor vehicle use, water use, waste generation, and construction. It is important to note, however, that the City’s Climate Action Plan is based on year 2020 GHG-reduction targets and has not yet been updated to reflect year 2030 GHG-reduction targets, per SB 32. Nonetheless, a summary of the proposed Project’s consistency with the measures identified in the City’s Climate Action Plan are summarized in Table 18. As noted, and with implementation of proposed mitigation measures, the project would be consistent with the GHG-reduction measures identified in the City’s currently adopted Climate Action Plan (City of Paso Robles 2013).

County of San Luis Obispo 2019 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy The 2019 RTP was adopted by the SLOCOG Board in June 2019. The RTP includes the region's SCS, which outlines how the region will meet or exceed its GHG reduction targets as required by SB 375 through the promotion of a variety of transportation demand management & system management tools and techniques to maximize the efficiency of the transportation network. Consistency with the requirement of SB 375 ensures consistency with the GHG-reduction targets set by ARB. The 2019 SCS was found to be consistent with the requirement of SB 375 and is also consistent with the general plans of the region’s jurisdictions (SLOCOG 2019).

Based on the VMT analysis prepared for the project, project-generated VMT would not exceed the City’s VMT significance threshold. In addition, in comparison to no-project conditions, regional VMT is projected to decrease with project implementation. As a result, the project would not be considered to conflict with regional VMT-reduction efforts.

California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan
As previously noted, ARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan reflects the new statewide GHG emissions reductions of 40 percent below 1990 emissions levels by 2030, as mandated by SB 32. A significant part of achieving the SB 32 goals are strategies to promote sustainable communities, such as the promotion of zero net energy buildings, and improved transportation choices that result in reducing VMT. Other measures include the increased use of low-carbon fuels and cleaner vehicles.

To support the State’s GHG emissions reduction goals, including the goals mandated by SB 32, California established the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act (SB 375). SB 375 requires regional Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 733 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
39 metropolitan planning organizations, such as SLOCOG, to develop SCSs which align transportation, housing, and land use decisions toward achieving the State’s GHG emissions-reduction targets. Under SB 375, the development and implementation of SCSs, which link transportation, land use, housing, and climate policy at the regional level, are designed to reduce per capita mobile-source GHG emissions, which is accomplished through implementation of measures that would result in reductions in per capita VMT.

In 2018, ARB adopted more aggressive SB 375 targets as one measure to support progress toward the 2017 Scoping Plan goals. SB 375 aims to achieve a 19 percent reduction in statewide per capita GHG emissions from passenger vehicles by year 2035 (relative to year 2005). To achieve this reduction, ARB sets target reductions for various regions throughout the state to be included in the RTP and SCS prepared for these regions. As discussed above, the proposed project would not exceed applicable VMT thresholds. As a result, the proposed project would not conflict with regional VMT-reduction goals. However, as noted in Impact GHG-1, the proposed project would exceed the efficiency threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP/year, which is based on achieving SB 32 by year 2030 GHG-reduction targets, consistent with ARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. For these reasons, without mitigation, the proposed project could conflict with the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan.

It is also important to note that the ARB has recently released its Draft 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update (ARB 2022). Consistent with the current 2017 Scoping Plan, the Draft 2022 Scoping Plan assesses the State’s progress towards meeting its target of reducing statewide GHG emissions to 40 percent below the 1990 levels by 2030. The Draft 2022 Scoping Plan also lays out a path for achieving carbon neutrality no later than 2045, per the goal identified in Executive Order B-55-18. The draft Scoping Plan is anticipated to be approved in the fall of 2022.

For land use development projects, additional reductions in GHG emissions may be required in order to meet the project’s fair share of the statewide reductions required to achieve carbon neutrality, consistent with Executive Order B-55-18 and ARB’s Draft 2022 Scoping Plan Update. Neither the SLOAPCD nor the City have developed recommended thresholds of significance that are based on achieving carbon neutrality by year 2045. However, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has recently released recommended GHG significance thresholds that are based on a “fair share” approach for achieving carbon neutrality goals. Consistent with this approach, new land use development projects would be considered to be consistent with the State’s carbon neutrality goals and would be considered to have a less-thansignificant impact if: 1) the project is deemed consistent with regional VMT-reduction targets; 2) the project prohibits the installation of natural gas infrastructure (to the extent that alternative power sources are available); and 3) the project would not result in a wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary energy use as determined by the analysis required under CEQA Section 21100(b)(3) and Section 15126.2(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Similarly, the SMAQMD has also recently released Best Management Practices (BMPs), which also include the prohibited installation of natural gas infrastructure for development projects, as well as a requirement that project’s meet current CALGreen Tier 2 standards for electric vehicle (EV) spaces, except that EV-capable spaces shall instead be EV ready. This additional requirement requires the installation of electrical infrastructure sufficient to service the future installation of EV chargers. The BAAQMD and SMAQMD thresholds are based on an approach endorsed by the Supreme Court in Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife (2015). Although not located within these jurisdictions, development in San Luis Obispo County and associated GHG emissions are comparable to those generated by developments within other areas of the state, including the BAAQMD and SMAQMD jurisdictions. Given that climate change is inherently a cumulative impact that occurs on a global scale, these BMPs would, likewise, be considered representative of the project’s “fair share” of what would be required to meet the State’s long-term climate goals, including achieving carbon neutrality by 2045, as identified by the BAAQMD and the SMAQMD.

As noted above, the proposed project would be consistent with the regional VMT-reduction targets.

However, as noted in Impact GHG-1, the proposed project would exceed the efficiency threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP/year, which is based on achieving SB 32 by year 2030 GHG-reduction targets, consistent with ARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. For these reasons, without mitigation, the proposed project could conflict with the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. In addition, the proposed project does not include BMPs that would constitute its “fair share” of what would be required to meet the State’s long-term climate goals, including achieving carbon neutrality by 2045. Specifically, the project does not prohibit the installation of natural gas-fueled appliances/equipment, nor require that current CALGreen Tier 2 compliant EV spaces be EV Ready, as opposed to EV Capable. As a result, this impact would be considered potentially significant.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 734 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
40 Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation Measures GHG-1
Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would reduce project-generated GHG emissions to ensure consistency with future year 2030 GHG-reduction targets. With mitigation, the project would be considered consistent with the regional GHG-reduction planning efforts, which have been deemed consistent with Statewide GHG-reduction planning efforts.

Mitigation measures have been included to require the installation of EV-Ready parking spaces in support of the State’s carbon neutrality goals. With regard to CALGreen EV parking requirements, “EV Capable” is defined as including the installation of “raceway” (the enclosed conduit that forms the physical pathway for electrical wiring to protect it from damage) and adequate future installation of a dedicated branch circuit and charging station(s). “EV Ready” includes “EV Capable” requirements plus addition of dedicated branch circuit(s) (electrical pre-wiring), circuit breakers, and other electrical components, including a receptacle (240-volt outlet) or blank cover needed to support future installation of one or more charging stations.

Mitigation has also been included to promote the use of electrically powered appliances/equipment as opposed to natural gas fueled appliances/equipment. With mitigation, the project would be considered consistent with the local, regional, and state GHG-reduction planning efforts. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 735 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
41 Table 18. Project Consistency with the City’s Climate Action Plan Climate Action Plan Measures Project Consistency
Energy Measures
Does the Project exclusively include “All-electric
buildings”?
Consistent with Mitigation. A mitigation measure has been included to encourage the installation of electricallypowered appliances in place of natural gas to the extent possible. Where natural gas service for equipment is
required, electrical service to the equipment shall also be required to promote the future conversion from natural
gas to electrical service (refer to Mitigation Measure GHG1).

If the Project/Plan includes a new mixed-fuel building or buildings (plumbed for the use of natural gas as fuel for space heating, water heating, cooking or clothes drying appliances) does that building/those buildings exceed
the City’s Energy Reach code?
Transportation and Land Use Measures
Does the Project comply with requirements in the City’s Municipal Code with no exceptions, including bicycle
parking, bikeway design, and EV charging stations?
Consistent. The project would comply with municipal code and building standards related to bicycle parking/design and EV charging stations.

Is the estimated Project-generated VMT within the City’s adopted thresholds, as confirmed by the City’s
Transportation Division?
Consistent. Based on the traffic analysis prepared for this project, project-generated VMT is within the City’s
adopted thresholds.

If “No”, does the Project/Plan include VMT mitigation
strategies and/or a Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) Plan approved by the City’s Transportation Division? Does the Project demonstrate consistency with the City’s Bicycle Network Plan?
Consistent. The project would comply with municipal code and building standards related to bicycle parking/design and EV charging stations.

Off-Road Measure
Will the Project work to reduce GHG emissions by reducing off-road equipment and vehicle usage and idling?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to require the Project restrict idling and vehicle usage when feasible and to use alternatively-powered
equipment where possible (refer to Mitigation Measures
AQ-2).

Water Measure
Does the Project comply with water efficiency and
conservation requirements?
Consistent with Mitigation. A mitigation measure has been included to require the use of low-flow water fixtures, water-efficient irrigation systems, and drought-tolerant landscaping (refer to Mitigation Measure GHG-1).

Waste Measure
Does the Project include an operational commitment to
reduce the amount of trash and other waste and recycle
as many materials as possible?
Consistent. The Project will provide organic waste pick up and will provide the appropriate on-site enclosures
consistent with the provisions of the City of Paso Robles Development Standards for Solid Waste Services.

Tree Planting Measure
Does the Project include an operational commitment to
maintain a healthy urban forest and incorporate native
drought tolerant trees?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to require the installation drought tolerant
landscaping (refer to Mitigation Measure GHG-1).

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 736 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
42 REFERENCES
California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed January 20,2018. ARB Health-Related Fact Sheets. Website URL:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/health/fs/fs.htm.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed January 20, 2017. California Green Building Strategy. Website URL:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/greenbuildings/greenbuildings.htm.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed January 13, 2022. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory.

Website URL: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Website URL:
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed December 12, 2020. Short Lived Climate Pollutants. Website URL:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/slcp.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed May 3, 2023. iADAM: Air Quality Data Statistics. Website URL:
https://www.arb.ca.gov/adam.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). 2022. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory: 2000-2019. Available at website url: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/cc/ca_ghg_inventory_trends_2000-2019.pdf.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). April 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed: July 28, 2023. Consumer Products EICs 2020 Inventory Update June 26, 2020. Website url: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022- 08/Documentation%20of%202020%20Inventory%20and%20Profile%20Update%200626620.pdf California Energy Commission (CEC). 2019. 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Website url:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2019-buildingenergy-efficiency.

California Employment Development Department. Labor Force and Unemployment Rate for Cities and Census Designated Places. Website url: https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/labor-force-and-unemploymentfor-cities-and-census-areas.html Central Coast Transportation Consulting (CCTC). June 27, 2023. 1745 Spring Street, Paso Robles – Transportation Analysis.

City of Paso Robles. 2013. City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan. Available at Website url:
https://www.prcity.com/DocumentCenter/View/14729/Climate-Action-Plan-PDF.

City of Paso Robles. Accessed September 13, 2022. Demographics. Website URL: https://www.prcity.com/ 244/Demographics.

Garcia Architecture + Design. 2023. Tobin James Mixed Use Project.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Fourth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Available at website url: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/ 2018/03/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf.

Iowa Environmental Mesonet. Accessed July 2023. IEM Site Information. Website URL:
https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/sites/site.php?station=PRB&network=CA_ASOS San Luis Obispo County Council of Governments (SLOCOG). 2019. Regional Housing Needs Allocation Plan. Website url:
https://slocog.org/programs/housing/regional-housing-needs-allocation-rhna.

San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG). 2019. SLOCOG 2019 Regional Transportation Plan. Available at website url: https://slocog.org/2019RTP.

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). January 29, 2019. SLO County Attainment Status.

Available at website URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/slocleanairorg/images/cms/upload/files/AttainmentStatus29January2019.pdf.

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). December 2001. Clean Air Plan.

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). April 2012. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Available at website url: https://www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/land-use-ceqa.php.

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). 2017 Clarification Memo related to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Available at website url: https://www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/land-use-ceqa.php.

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). 2018. APCD Naturally Occurring Asbestos Map. Available at website url: https://www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/land-use-ceqa.php.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Accessed: August 20, 2018. Overview of Greenhouse Gases.

Website URL: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2022a. AirNow. Website url: https://www.airnow.gov/.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 737 of 959 ends

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Tobin James Mixed Use Project August 2023
43 United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2022b. Air Quality Index Report. Website url:
https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/air-quality-index-report United States Department of Energy. 2019 Commercial Building Inventory. Website url:
https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/city-and-county-commercial-building-inventories-010d2/resource/49b435d8-9943- 43b0-8c38-1d2e59e49d6f.

United States Census Bureau. California: 2020 Census Website url: https://www.census.gov/library/stories/state-bystate/california-population-change-between-census-decade.html.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 738 of 959 ends

APPENDIX A

EMISSIONS MODELING
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 739 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/28/2023
1 / 7
SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

7. Health and Equity Details

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 740 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/28/2023
2 / 7

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name SPRING ST MIXED USE
Construction Start Date 7/2/2024
Operational Year 2026
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.00
Precipitation (days) 0.20
Location 35.63277458508328, -120.69238810999781
County San Luis Obispo
City Paso Robles
Air District San Luis Obispo County APCD
Air Basin South Central Coast
TAZ 3305
EDFZ 6
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.14

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 741 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/28/2023
3 / 7
Apartments Low
Rise

8.00 Dwelling Unit 0.10 8,480 — — 19.0 —
Hotel 16.0 Room 0.20 23,232 — — — —
Strip Mall 3.11 1000sqft 0.01 3,109 — — — —
Parking Lot 21.0 Space 0.10 0.00 — — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-2* Limit Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Construction C-5 Use Advanced Engine Tiers
Construction C-10-A Water Exposed Surfaces
Construction C-10-C Water Unpaved Construction Roads
Construction C-11 Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Construction C-12 Sweep Paved Roads
Construction C-13 Use Low-VOC Paints for Construction
Energy E-2 Require Energy Efficient Appliances
Water W-4 Require Low-Flow Water Fixtures
Refrigerants R-1 Use Alternative Refrigerants Instead of High-GWP Refrigerants Refrigerants R-5 Reduce Service Leak Emissions
Area Sources AS-1 Use Low-VOC Cleaning Supplies
Area Sources AS-2 Use Low-VOC Paints
* Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 742 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/28/2023
4 / 7
Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.55 5.78 11.9 14.7 0.02 0.54 5.44 5.98 0.50 2.60 3.10 1.26 2,623 Mit. 0.78 1.65 12.7 15.9 0.02 0.54 2.20 2.52 0.49 1.03 1.32 1.26 2,623 % Reduced 50% 71% -7% -8% — < 0.5% 60% 58% 1% 60% 57% — — Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.87 5.17 6.25 8.78 0.01 0.26 0.14 0.39 0.24 0.03 0.27 0.02 1,682 Mit. 0.37 1.25 7.69 9.77 0.01 0.32 0.14 0.46 0.29 0.03 0.33 0.02 1,682 % Reduced 58% 76% -23% -11% — -25% — -19% -23% — -22% — — Average
Daily (Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.48 2.81 3.46 4.84 0.01 0.14 0.35 0.46 0.13 0.16 0.26 0.19 924 Mit. 0.21 0.69 4.24 5.37 0.01 0.18 0.16 0.26 0.16 0.07 0.18 0.19 924 % Reduced 57% 76% -23% -11% — -29% 53% 44% -28% 57% 30% — — Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.09 0.51 0.63 0.88 < 0.005 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.03 153 Mit. 0.04 0.13 0.77 0.98 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.03 153 % Reduced 57% 76% -23% -11% — -29% 53% 44% -28% 57% 30% — —

Page 743 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/28/2023
5 / 7
Mit. 1.47 2.14 0.75 5.73 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 31.1 1,122 % Reduced — 10% — — — — — — — — — 20% 1%
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.20 2.12 0.79 4.51 0.01 0.02 0.52 0.54 0.02 0.13 0.16 36.5 1,109 Mit. 1.20 1.88 0.79 4.51 0.01 0.02 0.52 0.54 0.02 0.13 0.16 28.8 1,097 % Reduced — 12% — — — — — — — — — 21% 1%
Average
Daily (Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.41 2.32 0.79 5.79 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 37.4 1,118 Mit. 1.41 2.08 0.79 5.79 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 29.8 1,106 % Reduced — 11% — — — — — — — — — 20% 1%
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.26 0.42 0.14 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 6.20 185 Mit. 0.26 0.38 0.14 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 4.93 183 % Reduced — 11% — — — — — — — — — 20% 1%

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought 0 0 0 N/A
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 744 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/28/2023
6 / 7
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought 1 1 1 2
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

7. Health and Equity Details

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 47.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 23.0 Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 745 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/28/2023
7 / 7
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 746 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
1 / 71
SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.2. Grading (2024) - Mitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 747 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
2 / 71

3.3. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.4. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.6. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated

3.7. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated

3.8. Paving (2025) - Mitigated

3.9. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

3.10. Architectural Coating (2025) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 748 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
3 / 71

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.3.1. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.4.1. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.5.1. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 749 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
4 / 71

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 750 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
5 / 71

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 751 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
6 / 71

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 752 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
7 / 71

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 753 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
8 / 71

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 754 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
9 / 71

1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 755 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
10 / 71
Apartments Low
Rise

8.00 Dwelling Unit 0.10 8,480 — — 19.0 —
Hotel 16.0 Room 0.20 23,232 — — — —
Strip Mall 3.11 1000sqft 0.01 3,109 — — — —
Parking Lot 21.0 Space 0.10 0.00 — — — —

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Attachment 3 Exhibit A

Page 756 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
11 / 71
Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.55 5.78 11.9 14.7 0.02 0.54 5.44 5.98 0.50 2.60 3.10 1.26 2,623 Mit. 0.78 1.65 12.7 15.9 0.02 0.54 2.20 2.52 0.49 1.03 1.32 1.26 2,623 % Reduced 50% 71% -7% -8% — < 0.5% 60% 58% 1% 60% 57% — — Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.87 5.17 6.25 8.78 0.01 0.26 0.14 0.39 0.24 0.03 0.27 0.02 1,682 Mit. 0.37 1.25 7.69 9.77 0.01 0.32 0.14 0.46 0.29 0.03 0.33 0.02 1,682 % Reduced 58% 76% -23% -11% — -25% — -19% -23% — -22% — — Average
Daily (Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.48 2.81 3.46 4.84 0.01 0.14 0.35 0.46 0.13 0.16 0.26 0.19 924 Mit. 0.21 0.69 4.24 5.37 0.01 0.18 0.16 0.26 0.16 0.07 0.18 0.19 924 % Reduced 57% 76% -23% -11% — -29% 53% 44% -28% 57% 30% — — Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.09 0.51 0.63 0.88 < 0.005 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.03 153 Mit. 0.04 0.13 0.77 0.98 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.03 153 % Reduced 57% 76% -23% -11% — -29% 53% 44% -28% 57% 30% — —

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 1.47 1.22 11.9 11.1 0.02 0.54 5.44 5.98 0.50 2.60 3.10 0.85 2,117 Attachment 3
--------------
--------------
Exhibit A

Page 757 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
12 / 71
2025 1.55 5.78 10.7 14.7 0.02 0.44 0.24 0.68 0.41 0.06 0.46 1.26 2,623 Daily -
Winter (Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.75 0.63 5.83 7.61 0.01 0.26 0.12 0.38 0.24 0.03 0.27 0.02 1,533 2025 0.87 5.17 6.25 8.78 0.01 0.25 0.14 0.39 0.23 0.03 0.26 0.02 1,682 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.31 0.26 2.43 2.92 < 0.005 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.10 0.16 0.26 0.12 581 2025 0.48 2.81 3.46 4.84 0.01 0.14 0.08 0.22 0.13 0.02 0.15 0.19 924 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.06 0.05 0.44 0.53 < 0.005 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 96.2 2025 0.09 0.51 0.63 0.88 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 153

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.35 0.33 8.18 10.2 0.02 0.32 2.20 2.52 0.29 1.03 1.32 0.85 2,117 2025 0.78 1.65 12.7 15.9 0.02 0.54 0.24 0.78 0.49 0.06 0.55 1.26 2,623 Daily -
Winter (Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.31 0.30 6.61 8.74 0.01 0.25 0.12 0.38 0.23 0.03 0.26 0.02 1,533 2025 0.37 1.25 7.69 9.77 0.01 0.32 0.14 0.46 0.29 0.03 0.33 0.02 1,682 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.11 0.11 2.45 3.20 < 0.005 0.09 0.16 0.26 0.09 0.07 0.15 0.12 581 2025 0.21 0.69 4.24 5.37 0.01 0.18 0.08 0.26 0.16 0.02 0.18 0.19 924 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

Page 758 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
13 / 71
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.02 0.02 0.45 0.58 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 96.2 2025 0.04 0.13 0.77 0.98 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 153

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.47 2.38 0.75 5.73 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 38.8 1,134 Mit. 1.47 2.14 0.75 5.73 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 31.1 1,122 % Reduced — 10% — — — — — — — — — 20% 1%
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.20 2.12 0.79 4.51 0.01 0.02 0.52 0.54 0.02 0.13 0.16 36.5 1,109 Mit. 1.20 1.88 0.79 4.51 0.01 0.02 0.52 0.54 0.02 0.13 0.16 28.8 1,097 % Reduced — 12% — — — — — — — — — 21% 1%
Average
Daily (Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.41 2.32 0.79 5.79 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 37.4 1,118 Mit. 1.41 2.08 0.79 5.79 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 29.8 1,106 % Reduced — 11% — — — — — — — — — 20% 1%
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.26 0.42 0.14 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 6.20 185 Mit. 0.26 0.38 0.14 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 4.93 183 % Reduced — 11% — — — — — — — — — 20% 1%
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

Page 759 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
14 / 71

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.20 1.16 0.52 3.96 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 2.37 668 Area 0.25 1.21 0.01 1.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.95 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.16 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 380 Water — — — — — — — — — — — — 9.90
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.7
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — 36.4 36.4
Total 1.47 2.38 0.75 5.73 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 38.8 1,134 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.18 1.13 0.57 4.35 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.06 649 Area 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.16 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 380 Water — — — — — — — — — — — — 9.90
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.7
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — 36.4 36.4
Total 1.20 2.12 0.79 4.51 0.01 0.02 0.52 0.54 0.02 0.13 0.16 36.5 1,109 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.17 1.12 0.56 4.19 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 1.02 653 Area 0.22 1.19 0.01 1.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.38 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.16 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 380 Water — — — — — — — — — — — — 9.90
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

Page 760 of 959 ends

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
15 / 71
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.7
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — 36.4 36.4
Total 1.41 2.32 0.79 5.79 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 37.4 1,118 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.21 0.20 0.10 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 0.17 108 Area 0.04 0.22 < 0.005 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.89 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 62.8 Water — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.64
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.58
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — 6.03 6.03
Total 0.26 0.42 0.14 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 6.20 185

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.20 1.16 0.52 3.96 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 2.37 668 Area 0.25 0.97 0.01 1.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.95 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.16 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 377 Water — — — — — — — — — — — — 8.64
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.7
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — 28.8 28.8
Total 1.47 2.14 0.75 5.73 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 31.1 1,122 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.18 1.13 0.57 4.35 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.06 649 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

Page 761 of 959 ends

Paso Robles City CouncilOctober 1, 2024

Paso Robles City Council
October 1, 2024