Paso Robles City Council
October 1, 2024

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
16 / 71
Area 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.16 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 377 Water — — — — — — — — — — — — 8.64
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.7
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — 28.8 28.8
Total 1.20 1.88 0.79 4.51 0.01 0.02 0.52 0.54 0.02 0.13 0.16 28.8 1,097 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.17 1.12 0.56 4.19 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 1.02 653 Area 0.22 0.94 0.01 1.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.38 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.16 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 377 Water — — — — — — — — — — — — 8.64
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.7
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — 28.8 28.8
Total 1.41 2.08 0.79 5.79 0.01 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.03 0.13 0.16 29.8 1,106 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.21 0.20 0.10 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 0.17 108 Area 0.04 0.17 < 0.005 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.89 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 62.3 Water — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.43
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.58
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — 4.76 4.76
Total 0.26 0.38 0.14 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 4.93 183

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
17 / 71
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.41 1.19 11.4 10.7 0.02 0.53 — 0.53 0.49 — 0.49 — 1,719 Dust From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 5.31 5.31 — 2.57 2.57 — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.66 0.62 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 98.9 Dust From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.31 0.31 — 0.15 0.15 — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 16.4 Dust From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.03 0.03 — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
18 / 71
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.21 47.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.64 350 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.63 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 20.1 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.44 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.33

3.2. Grading (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.29 0.29 7.68 9.79 0.02 0.32 — 0.32 0.28 — 0.28 — 1,719 Dust From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.07 2.07 — 1.00 1.00 — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
19 / 71
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.44 0.56 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 98.9 Dust From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.12 0.12 — 0.06 0.06 — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 16.4 Dust From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.21 47.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.64 350 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.63 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 20.1 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.44 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
20 / 71
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.33

3.3. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,309 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,309 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.17 1.68 2.09 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 392 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.03 0.31 0.38 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 64.9 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.46 104 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
21 / 71
Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.18 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.31 124 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 99.8 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.19 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 124 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.06 30.1 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 37.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.99 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.13 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.4. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.22 6.37 8.10 0.01 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,309 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
22 / 71
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.22 6.37 8.10 0.01 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,309 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.07 1.91 2.43 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 392 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.35 0.44 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 64.9 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.46 104 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.18 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.31 124 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 99.8 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.19 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 124 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.06 30.1 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 37.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
23 / 71
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.99 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.13 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.62 0.52 5.14 6.94 0.01 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 1,309 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.62 0.52 5.14 6.94 0.01 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 1,309 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.33 0.28 2.75 3.71 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 699
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.50 0.68 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 116 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
24 / 71
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.42 103 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.17 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.30 122 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 97.9 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.18 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 122 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.10 52.8 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 65.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.73 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.22 6.37 8.10 0.01 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,309 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
25 / 71
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.22 6.37 8.10 0.01 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,309 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.12 3.40 4.33 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.12 — 0.12 — 699
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.62 0.79 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 116 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.42 103 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.17 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.30 122 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 97.9 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.18 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 122 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.10 52.8 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 65.0 Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
26 / 71
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.73 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 0.51 4.37 5.31 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.18 — 0.18 — 826
Paving — 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.11 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 20.4 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.37 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
27 / 71
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.45 109 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.58 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.43 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Paving (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.34 0.30 4.97 5.55 0.01 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 826
Paving — 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
28 / 71
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 20.4 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.37 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.45 109 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.58 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.43 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
29 / 71
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 Architectural
Coatings
— 4.43 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 Architectural
Coatings
— 4.43 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.48 0.62 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 72.7 Architectural
Coatings
— 2.41 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.09 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.0 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
30 / 71
Architectural
Coatings
— 0.44 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 20.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 19.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 10.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.77 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.10. Architectural Coating (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
31 / 71
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 134 Architectural
Coatings
— 0.89 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 134 Architectural
Coatings
— 0.89 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.59 0.52 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 72.7 Architectural
Coatings
— 0.48 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.11 0.10 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 12.0 Architectural
Coatings
— 0.09 — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 20.5 Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
32 / 71
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 19.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 10.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.77 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise

0.23 0.22 0.10 0.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 0.44 125 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
33 / 71
Hotel 0.55 0.53 0.24 1.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 1.08 306 Strip Mall 0.42 0.41 0.18 1.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 0.19 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 0.84 237 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.20 1.16 0.52 3.96 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 2.37 668 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise

0.23 0.22 0.11 0.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 0.01 122 Hotel 0.54 0.51 0.26 1.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 0.03 297 Strip Mall 0.41 0.40 0.20 1.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 0.19 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 0.02 230 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.18 1.13 0.57 4.35 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.06 649 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise

0.04 0.04 0.02 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 20.3 Hotel 0.10 0.09 0.05 0.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.08 49.5 Strip Mall 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.06 38.3 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.21 0.20 0.10 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 0.17 108

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise

0.23 0.22 0.10 0.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 0.44 125 Hotel 0.55 0.53 0.24 1.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 1.08 306 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
34 / 71
Strip Mall 0.42 0.41 0.18 1.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 0.19 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 0.84 237 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.20 1.16 0.52 3.96 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 2.37 668 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise

0.23 0.22 0.11 0.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 0.01 122 Hotel 0.54 0.51 0.26 1.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 0.03 297 Strip Mall 0.41 0.40 0.20 1.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 0.19 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 0.02 230 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.18 1.13 0.57 4.35 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.06 649 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise

0.04 0.04 0.02 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 20.3 Hotel 0.10 0.09 0.05 0.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.08 49.5 Strip Mall 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.06 38.3 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.21 0.20 0.10 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 0.17 108

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 14.2
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 81.0
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
35 / 71
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 14.5
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.15
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 112
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 14.2
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 81.0
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 14.5
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.15
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 112
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.36
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.4
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.40
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.36
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 13.4
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 78.9
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 14.4
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
36 / 71
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.15
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 109
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 13.4
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 78.9
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 14.4
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.15
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 109
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.21
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.1
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.38
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.36
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 18.0

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 68.9 Hotel 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 193 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.97 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
37 / 71
Total 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.16 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 268 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 68.9 Hotel 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 193 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.97 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.16 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 268 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.4 Hotel < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 31.9 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.99 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 44.3

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 68.9 Hotel 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 193 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.97 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.16 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 268 Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
38 / 71
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 68.9 Hotel 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 193 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.97 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.16 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 268 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.4 Hotel < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 31.9 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.99 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 44.3

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Consumer
Products
— 0.75 — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectural
Coatings
— 0.24 — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
39 / 71
Landscape 0.25 0.23 0.01 1.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.95 Equipment
Total 0.25 1.21 0.01 1.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.95 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Consumer
Products
— 0.75 — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectural
Coatings
— 0.24 — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Consumer
Products
— 0.14 — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectural
Coatings
— 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscape
Equipment

0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.89 Total 0.04 0.22 < 0.005 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.89

4.3.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Consumer
Products
— 0.69 — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
40 / 71
Architectural — 0.05 — — — — — — — — — — —
Coatings
Landscape
Equipment

0.25 0.23 0.01 1.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.95 Total 0.25 0.97 0.01 1.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.95 Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Consumer
Products
— 0.69 — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectural
Coatings
— 0.05 — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 Consumer
Products
— 0.13 — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectural
Coatings
— 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscape
Equipment

0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.89 Total 0.04 0.17 < 0.005 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.89

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
41 / 71
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.73
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.58
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.60
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 9.90
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.73
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.58
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.60
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 9.90
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.45
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.76
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.43
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.64

4.4.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.25
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
42 / 71
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.04
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.36
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 8.64
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.25
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.04
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.36
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 8.64
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.67
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.39
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.43

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 11.0
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
43 / 71
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 16.5
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.16
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.7
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 11.0
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 16.5
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.16
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.7
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1.83
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.73
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.02
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.58

4.5.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 11.0
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 16.5
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
44 / 71
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.16
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.7
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 11.0
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 16.5
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.16
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.7
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1.83
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.73
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.02
Parking Lot — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.58

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.06
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 36.3 36.3
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
45 / 71
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 36.4 36.4
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.06
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 36.3 36.3
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 36.4 36.4
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 6.01 6.01
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 6.03 6.03

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.06
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 28.7 28.7
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 28.8 28.8
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
46 / 71
Apartments — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.06
Low Rise
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 28.7 28.7
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 28.8 28.8
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartments
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 4.75 4.75
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4.76 4.76

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
47 / 71
Equipment
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
48 / 71
Equipment
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
49 / 71
Equipment
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Attachment 3
--------------
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
50 / 71
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
51 / 71
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Attachment 3
--------------
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
52 / 71
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
53 / 71
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Grading Grading 7/2/2024 7/30/2024 5.00 21.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 8/1/2024 9/30/2025 5.00 304 — Paving Paving 6/3/2025 6/13/2025 5.00 9.00 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/1/2025 10/3/2025 5.00 198 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
54 / 71
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Grading Graders Diesel Tier 3 1.00 6.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 3 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 3 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 3 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 3 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 3 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 3 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 3 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 3 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 3 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
55 / 71

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 7.50 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 4.48 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 16.5 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 5.17 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 17.5 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 3.30 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
56 / 71
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 7.50 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 4.48 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 16.5 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 5.17 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 17.5 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 3.30 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
57 / 71
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated Parking Area Coated (sq ft) (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 17,172 5,724 39,512 13,171 261

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Yards) Material Exported (Cubic Yards) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Grading — 750 15.8 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Apartments Low Rise — 0%
Hotel 0.00 0%
Strip Mall 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 0.10 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
58 / 71

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Low
Rise

54.0 54.0 54.0 19,710 137 137 137 50,019
Hotel 128 128 128 46,720 335 335 335 122,349
Strip Mall 99.0 99.0 99.0 36,132 259 259 259 94,620
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Low
Rise

54.0 54.0 54.0 19,710 137 137 137 50,019
Hotel 128 128 128 46,720 335 335 335 122,349
Strip Mall 99.0 99.0 99.0 36,132 259 259 259 94,620
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Low Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 0
Propane Fireplaces 0
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
59 / 71
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 8
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.1.2. Mitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Low Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 0
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 8
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
17172 5,724 39,512 13,171 261

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
60 / 71
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 330

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 330

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Low Rise 25,237 204 0.0330 0.0040 214,348
Hotel 143,468 204 0.0330 0.0040 600,007
Strip Mall 25,734 204 0.0330 0.0040 18,570
Parking Lot 3,816 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Low Rise 23,699 204 0.0330 0.0040 214,348
Hotel 139,821 204 0.0330 0.0040 600,007
Strip Mall 25,491 204 0.0330 0.0040 18,570
Parking Lot 3,816 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
61 / 71

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Low Rise 241,776 0.00
Hotel 405,868 0.00
Strip Mall 230,291 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Low Rise 199,514 0.00
Hotel 357,935 0.00
Strip Mall 208,966 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Low Rise 5.85 —
Hotel 8.76 —
Strip Mall 3.26 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.13.2. Mitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
62 / 71
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Low Rise 5.85 —
Hotel 8.76 —
Strip Mall 3.26 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Hotel Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 0.00 1.00
Hotel Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 4.00 18.0
Hotel Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
63 / 71
Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.00 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 — 1.00
Hotel Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 — 1.00
Hotel Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 2.00 18.0
Hotel Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
User Defined 2,200 < 0.005 7.50 2.00 20.0
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 2.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 — 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
User Defined 2,200 < 0.005 7.50 2.00 20.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
64 / 71

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
65 / 71

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 21.3 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 5.00 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 25.5 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
66 / 71

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought 0 0 0 N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought 1 1 1 2
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
67 / 71
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 40.0
AQ-PM 8.24
AQ-DPM 52.8
Drinking Water 47.7
Lead Risk Housing 86.0
Pesticides 46.2
Toxic Releases 17.4
Traffic 37.8
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 25.6
Groundwater 14.3
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 69.4
Impaired Water Bodies 33.2
Solid Waste 63.7
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 50.5
Cardio-vascular 23.5
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
68 / 71
Low Birth Weights 32.3
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 78.1
Housing 10.8
Linguistic 76.9
Poverty 81.2
Unemployment 33.6

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 21.48081612
Employed 45.27139741
Median HI 32.13139997
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 20.73655845
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 1.873476197
Transportation —
Auto Access 60.64416784
Active commuting 10.09880662
Social —
2-parent households 15.21878609
Voting 57.33350443
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 12.44706788
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
69 / 71
Park access 20.78788656
Retail density 59.5534454
Supermarket access 39.30450404
Tree canopy 77.28730912
Housing—
Homeownership 11.13820095
Housing habitability 58.64237136
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 86.83433851 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 93.750802
Uncrowded housing 28.08931092
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 9.765173874
Arthritis 0.0
Asthma ER Admissions 45.7
High Blood Pressure 0.0
Cancer (excluding skin) 0.0
Asthma 0.0
Coronary Heart Disease 0.0
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 7.0
Cognitively Disabled 70.6
Physically Disabled 90.7
Heart Attack ER Admissions 67.5
Mental Health Not Good 0.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.0
Obesity 0.0
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
70 / 71
Pedestrian Injuries 66.3
Physical Health Not Good 0.0
Stroke 0.0
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 0.0
Current Smoker 0.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 0.0
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 36.4
Elderly 74.7
English Speaking 21.9
Foreign-born 64.2
Outdoor Workers 22.1
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 75.0
Traffic Density 28.9
Traffic Access 0.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 72.7
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 61.8

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 47.0 Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/28/2023
71 / 71
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 23.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Total site acreage ~0.5 acres
Construction: Construction Phases Site previously developed. No site prep or demo required. Estimated 14-mo const period. Grading will require ~750 cy export. All other assumptions based on model defaults.

Construction: Architectural Coatings Includes use of low-VOC int/ext paints Operations: Vehicle Data Based on a total of 281 trips/day derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project.

Operations: Water and Waste Water Based on defaults
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Quarterly Report, 7/28/2023
1 / 5
SPRING ST MIXED USE Quarterly Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions

2.1.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.1.2. Construction Quarters

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Quarterly Report, 7/28/2023
2 / 5

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name SPRING ST MIXED USE
Construction Start Date 7/2/2024
Operational Year 2026
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.00
Precipitation (days) 0.20
Location 35.63277458508328, -120.69238810999781
County San Luis Obispo
City Paso Robles
Air District San Luis Obispo County APCD
Air Basin South Central Coast
TAZ 3305
EDFZ 6
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.14

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Quarterly Report, 7/28/2023
3 / 5
Apartments Low
Rise

8.00 Dwelling Unit 0.10 8,480 — — 19.0 —
Hotel 16.0 Room 0.20 23,232 — — — —
Strip Mall 3.11 1000sqft 0.01 3,109 — — — —
Parking Lot 21.0 Space 0.10 0.00 — — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-2* Limit Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Construction C-5 Use Advanced Engine Tiers
Construction C-10-A Water Exposed Surfaces
Construction C-10-C Water Unpaved Construction Roads
Construction C-11 Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Construction C-12 Sweep Paved Roads
Construction C-13 Use Low-VOC Paints for Construction
Energy E-2 Require Energy Efficient Appliances
Water W-4 Require Low-Flow Water Fixtures
Refrigerants R-1 Use Alternative Refrigerants Instead of High-GWP Refrigerants Refrigerants R-5 Reduce Service Leak Emissions
Area Sources AS-1 Use Low-VOC Cleaning Supplies
Area Sources AS-2 Use Low-VOC Paints
* Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions

2.1.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Quarterly Report, 7/28/2023
4 / 5
Criteria Pollutants (ton/quarter) and GHGs (MT/quarter) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Q1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.08 0.07 0.65 0.85 < 0.005 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 145 Mit. 0.03 0.03 0.78 0.99 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.04 145 % Reduced 65% 59% -19% -16% — -7% 61% 53% -5% 61% 23% — — Q2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.12 0.10 0.98 1.27 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.06 216 Mit. 0.04 0.04 1.16 1.47 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.06 216 % Reduced 65% 59% -19% -16% — -7% — -7% -5% — -5% — —
Q3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.12 0.40 0.98 1.27 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.06 216 Mit. 0.04 0.08 1.16 1.47 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.06 216 % Reduced 65% 80% -19% -16% — -7% — -7% -5% — -5% — —
Q4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.12 0.40 0.98 1.27 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.06 216 Mit. 0.04 0.08 1.16 1.47 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.06 216 % Reduced 65% 80% -19% -16% — -7% — -7% -5% — -5% — —
Q5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.12 0.40 0.98 1.27 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.06 216 Mit. 0.04 0.08 1.16 1.47 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.06 216 % Reduced 65% 80% -19% -16% — -7% — -7% -5% — -5% — —
Q6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. < 0.005 0.02 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.38 Mit. < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.38 % Reduced 65% 80% -19% -16% — -7% — -7% -5% — -5% — —
Quarterly
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Quarterly Report, 7/28/2023
5 / 5
Unmit. 0.12 0.40 0.98 1.27 < 0.005 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.06 216 Mit. 0.04 0.08 1.16 1.47 < 0.005 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.06 216 % Reduced 65% 80% -19% -16% — -7% 61% 30% -5% 61% -5% — —

2.1.2. Construction Quarters
Quarter Start Date End Date Length (days)
Q1 7/2/2024 9/30/2024 91
Q2 10/1/2024 12/30/2024 91
Q3 12/31/2024 3/31/2025 91
Q4 4/1/2025 6/30/2025 91
Q5 7/1/2025 9/29/2025 91
Q6 9/30/2025 10/3/2025 4

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (ton/quarter) and GHGs (MT/quarter) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T R CO2e Quarterly — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.87 11.3 Mit. 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.87 11.3 % Reduced — 7% — — — — — — — — — < 0.5% —
Attachment 3
--------------
Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/30/2023
1 / 6
SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

7. Health and Equity Details

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/30/2023
2 / 6

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name SPRING ST MIXED USE
Operational Year 2030
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.00
Precipitation (days) 0.20
Location 35.63277458508328, -120.69238810999781
County San Luis Obispo
City Paso Robles
Air District San Luis Obispo County APCD
Air Basin South Central Coast
TAZ 3305
EDFZ 6
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.14

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Apartments Low
Rise

8.00 Dwelling Unit 0.10 8,480 — — 19.0 —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/30/2023
3 / 6
Hotel 16.0 Room 0.20 23,232 — — — —
Strip Mall 3.11 1000sqft 0.01 3,109 — — — —
Parking Lot 21.0 Space 0.10 0.00 — — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-2* Limit Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Construction C-5 Use Advanced Engine Tiers
Construction C-10-A Water Exposed Surfaces
Construction C-10-C Water Unpaved Construction Roads
Construction C-11 Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Construction C-12 Sweep Paved Roads
Construction C-13 Use Low-VOC Paints for Construction
Energy E-2 Require Energy Efficient Appliances
Water W-4 Require Low-Flow Water Fixtures
Refrigerants R-1 Use Alternative Refrigerants Instead of High-GWP Refrigerants Refrigerants R-5 Reduce Service Leak Emissions
Area Sources AS-1 Use Low-VOC Cleaning Supplies
Area Sources AS-2 Use Low-VOC Paints
* Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/30/2023
4 / 6
Unmit. 995 1.23 0.04 37.9 1,077
Mit. 992 1.20 0.04 22.2 1,057
% Reduced < 0.5% 2% — 41% 2%
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 973 1.23 0.05 36.4 1,054
Mit. 969 1.21 0.05 20.7 1,034
% Reduced < 0.5% 2% — 43% 2%
Average Daily (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 981 1.23 0.05 37.1 1,062
Mit. 977 1.21 0.05 21.4 1,042
% Reduced < 0.5% 2% — 42% 2%
Annual (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 162 0.20 0.01 6.14 176
Mit. 162 0.20 0.01 3.54 173
% Reduced < 0.5% 2% 1% 42% 2%

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought 0 0 0 N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/30/2023
5 / 6
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought 1 1 1 2
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

7. Health and Equity Details

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 47.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 23.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Summary Report, 7/30/2023
6 / 6
Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
1 / 43
SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
2 / 43

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.3.1. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.4.1. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.5.1. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
3 / 43

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
4 / 43

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
5 / 43

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
6 / 43

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
7 / 43

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name SPRING ST MIXED USE
Operational Year 2030
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.00
Precipitation (days) 0.20
Location 35.63277458508328, -120.69238810999781
County San Luis Obispo
City Paso Robles
Air District San Luis Obispo County APCD
Air Basin South Central Coast
TAZ 3305
EDFZ 6
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.14

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Apartments Low
Rise

8.00 Dwelling Unit 0.10 8,480 — — 19.0 —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
8 / 43
Hotel 16.0 Room 0.20 23,232 — — — —
Strip Mall 3.11 1000sqft 0.01 3,109 — — — —
Parking Lot 21.0 Space 0.10 0.00 — — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-2* Limit Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Construction C-5 Use Advanced Engine Tiers
Construction C-10-A Water Exposed Surfaces
Construction C-10-C Water Unpaved Construction Roads
Construction C-11 Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Construction C-12 Sweep Paved Roads
Construction C-13 Use Low-VOC Paints for Construction
Energy E-2 Require Energy Efficient Appliances
Water W-4 Require Low-Flow Water Fixtures
Refrigerants R-1 Use Alternative Refrigerants Instead of High-GWP Refrigerants Refrigerants R-5 Reduce Service Leak Emissions
Area Sources AS-1 Use Low-VOC Cleaning Supplies
Area Sources AS-2 Use Low-VOC Paints
* Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
9 / 43
Unmit. 995 1.23 0.04 37.9 1,077
Mit. 992 1.20 0.04 22.2 1,057
% Reduced < 0.5% 2% — 41% 2%
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 973 1.23 0.05 36.4 1,054
Mit. 969 1.21 0.05 20.7 1,034
% Reduced < 0.5% 2% — 43% 2%
Average Daily (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 981 1.23 0.05 37.1 1,062
Mit. 977 1.21 0.05 21.4 1,042
% Reduced < 0.5% 2% — 42% 2%
Annual (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 162 0.20 0.01 6.14 176
Mit. 162 0.20 0.01 3.54 173
% Reduced < 0.5% 2% 1% 42% 2%

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Mobile 598 0.05 0.04 1.54 612
Area 5.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.95
Energy 378 0.04 < 0.005 — 380
Water 4.34 0.17 < 0.005 — 9.90
Waste 9.64 0.96 0.00 — 33.7
Refrig. — — — 36.4 36.4
Total 995 1.23 0.04 37.9 1,077
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
10 / 43
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Mobile 581 0.06 0.04 0.04 594
Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Energy 378 0.04 < 0.005 — 380
Water 4.34 0.17 < 0.005 — 9.90
Waste 9.64 0.96 0.00 — 33.7
Refrig. — — — 36.4 36.4
Total 973 1.23 0.05 36.4 1,054
Average Daily — — — — —
Mobile 584 0.05 0.04 0.66 597
Area 5.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.38
Energy 378 0.04 < 0.005 — 380
Water 4.34 0.17 < 0.005 — 9.90
Waste 9.64 0.96 0.00 — 33.7
Refrig. — — — 36.4 36.4
Total 981 1.23 0.05 37.1 1,062
Annual — — — — —
Mobile 96.6 0.01 0.01 0.11 98.9
Area 0.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.89
Energy 62.5 0.01 < 0.005 — 62.8
Water 0.72 0.03 < 0.005 — 1.64
Waste 1.60 0.16 0.00 — 5.58
Refrig. — — — 6.03 6.03
Total 162 0.20 0.01 6.14 176

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
11 / 43
Sector CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Mobile 598 0.05 0.04 1.54 612
Area 5.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.95
Energy 375 0.04 < 0.005 — 377
Water 3.79 0.15 < 0.005 — 8.64
Waste 9.64 0.96 0.00 — 33.7
Refrig. — — — 20.7 20.7
Total 992 1.20 0.04 22.2 1,057
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Mobile 581 0.06 0.04 0.04 594
Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Energy 375 0.04 < 0.005 — 377
Water 3.79 0.15 < 0.005 — 8.64
Waste 9.64 0.96 0.00 — 33.7
Refrig. — — — 20.7 20.7
Total 969 1.21 0.05 20.7 1,034
Average Daily — — — — —
Mobile 584 0.05 0.04 0.66 597
Area 5.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.38
Energy 375 0.04 < 0.005 — 377
Water 3.79 0.15 < 0.005 — 8.64
Waste 9.64 0.96 0.00 — 33.7
Refrig. — — — 20.7 20.7
Total 977 1.21 0.05 21.4 1,042
Annual — — — — —
Mobile 96.6 0.01 0.01 0.11 98.9
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
12 / 43
Area 0.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.89
Energy 62.0 0.01 < 0.005 — 62.3
Water 0.63 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.43
Waste 1.60 0.16 0.00 — 5.58
Refrig. — — — 3.43 3.43
Total 162 0.20 0.01 3.54 173

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 112 0.01 0.01 0.29 115
Hotel 274 0.02 0.02 0.70 280
Strip Mall 212 0.02 0.01 0.54 217
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 598 0.05 0.04 1.54 612
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 109 0.01 0.01 0.01 112
Hotel 266 0.03 0.02 0.02 272
Strip Mall 206 0.02 0.01 0.01 211
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 581 0.06 0.04 0.04 594
Annual — — — — —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
13 / 43
Apartments Low Rise 18.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 18.6
Hotel 44.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 45.3
Strip Mall 34.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 35.0
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 96.6 0.01 0.01 0.11 98.9

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 112 0.01 0.01 0.29 115
Hotel 274 0.02 0.02 0.70 280
Strip Mall 212 0.02 0.01 0.54 217
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 598 0.05 0.04 1.54 612
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 109 0.01 0.01 0.01 112
Hotel 266 0.03 0.02 0.02 272
Strip Mall 206 0.02 0.01 0.01 211
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 581 0.06 0.04 0.04 594
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 18.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 18.6
Hotel 44.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 45.3
Strip Mall 34.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 35.0
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 96.6 0.01 0.01 0.11 98.9
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
14 / 43

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 14.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.2
Hotel 80.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 81.0
Strip Mall 14.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.5
Parking Lot 2.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.15
Total 111 0.02 < 0.005 — 112
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 14.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.2
Hotel 80.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 81.0
Strip Mall 14.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.5
Parking Lot 2.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.15
Total 111 0.02 < 0.005 — 112
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 2.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.36
Hotel 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4
Strip Mall 2.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.40
Parking Lot 0.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.36
Total 18.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.5

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
15 / 43
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 13.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4
Hotel 78.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 78.9
Strip Mall 14.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.4
Parking Lot 2.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.15
Total 108 0.02 < 0.005 — 109
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 13.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4
Hotel 78.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 78.9
Strip Mall 14.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.4
Parking Lot 2.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.15
Total 108 0.02 < 0.005 — 109
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 2.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.21
Hotel 12.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.1
Strip Mall 2.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.38
Parking Lot 0.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.36
Total 17.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.0

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 68.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 68.9
Hotel 192 0.02 < 0.005 — 193
Strip Mall 5.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.97
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
16 / 43
Total 267 0.02 < 0.005 — 268
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 68.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 68.9
Hotel 192 0.02 < 0.005 — 193
Strip Mall 5.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.97
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 267 0.02 < 0.005 — 268
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 11.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.4
Hotel 31.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.9
Strip Mall 0.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.99
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 44.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 44.3

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 68.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 68.9
Hotel 192 0.02 < 0.005 — 193
Strip Mall 5.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.97
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 267 0.02 < 0.005 — 268
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 68.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 68.9
Hotel 192 0.02 < 0.005 — 193
Strip Mall 5.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.97
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
17 / 43
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 267 0.02 < 0.005 — 268
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 11.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.4
Hotel 31.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.9
Strip Mall 0.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.99
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 44.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 44.3

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Consumer Products — — — — —
Architectural Coatings — — — — —
Landscape Equipment 5.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.95
Total 5.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.95
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Consumer Products — — — — —
Architectural Coatings — — — — —
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
18 / 43
Consumer Products — — — — —
Architectural Coatings — — — — —
Landscape Equipment 0.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.89
Total 0.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.89

4.3.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Consumer Products — — — — —
Architectural Coatings — — — — —
Landscape Equipment 5.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.95
Total 5.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.95
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Consumer Products — — — — —
Architectural Coatings — — — — —
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Consumer Products — — — — —
Architectural Coatings — — — — —
Landscape Equipment 0.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.89
Total 0.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.89

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
19 / 43

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 1.19 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.73
Hotel 2.00 0.08 < 0.005 — 4.58
Strip Mall 1.14 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.60
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 4.34 0.17 < 0.005 — 9.90
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 1.19 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.73
Hotel 2.00 0.08 < 0.005 — 4.58
Strip Mall 1.14 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.60
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 4.34 0.17 < 0.005 — 9.90
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 0.20 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.45
Hotel 0.33 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.76
Strip Mall 0.19 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.43
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 0.72 0.03 < 0.005 — 1.64

4.4.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 0.99 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.25
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
20 / 43
Hotel 1.77 0.07 < 0.005 — 4.04
Strip Mall 1.03 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.36
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 3.79 0.15 < 0.005 — 8.64
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 0.99 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.25
Hotel 1.77 0.07 < 0.005 — 4.04
Strip Mall 1.03 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.36
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 3.79 0.15 < 0.005 — 8.64
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 0.16 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.37
Hotel 0.29 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.67
Strip Mall 0.17 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.39
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 0.63 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.43

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 3.16 0.32 0.00 — 11.0
Hotel 4.72 0.47 0.00 — 16.5
Strip Mall 1.76 0.18 0.00 — 6.16
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
21 / 43
Total 9.64 0.96 0.00 — 33.7
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 3.16 0.32 0.00 — 11.0
Hotel 4.72 0.47 0.00 — 16.5
Strip Mall 1.76 0.18 0.00 — 6.16
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 9.64 0.96 0.00 — 33.7
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 0.52 0.05 0.00 — 1.83
Hotel 0.78 0.08 0.00 — 2.73
Strip Mall 0.29 0.03 0.00 — 1.02
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 1.60 0.16 0.00 — 5.58

4.5.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 3.16 0.32 0.00 — 11.0
Hotel 4.72 0.47 0.00 — 16.5
Strip Mall 1.76 0.18 0.00 — 6.16
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 9.64 0.96 0.00 — 33.7
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 3.16 0.32 0.00 — 11.0
Hotel 4.72 0.47 0.00 — 16.5
Strip Mall 1.76 0.18 0.00 — 6.16
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
22 / 43
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 9.64 0.96 0.00 — 33.7
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise 0.52 0.05 0.00 — 1.83
Hotel 0.78 0.08 0.00 — 2.73
Strip Mall 0.29 0.03 0.00 — 1.02
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 1.60 0.16 0.00 — 5.58

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise — — — 0.06 0.06
Hotel — — — 36.3 36.3
Strip Mall — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — 36.4 36.4
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise — — — 0.06 0.06
Hotel — — — 36.3 36.3
Strip Mall — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — 36.4 36.4
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise — — — 0.01 0.01
Hotel — — — 6.01 6.01
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
23 / 43
Strip Mall — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — 6.03 6.03

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise — — — 0.06 0.06
Hotel — — — 20.6 20.6
Strip Mall — — — 0.01 0.01
Total — — — 20.7 20.7
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise — — — 0.06 0.06
Hotel — — — 20.6 20.6
Strip Mall — — — 0.01 0.01
Total — — — 20.7 20.7
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Low Rise — — — 0.01 0.01
Hotel — — — 3.41 3.41
Strip Mall — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — 3.43 3.43

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
24 / 43
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
25 / 43
Total — — — — —

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
26 / 43
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
27 / 43
Total — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Avoided — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Removed — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
— — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Avoided — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Removed — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
— — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Avoided — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Removed — — — — —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
28 / 43
Subtotal — — — — —
— — — — — —

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
29 / 43
Avoided — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Removed — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
— — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Avoided — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Removed — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
— — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Avoided — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Removed — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
— — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
30 / 43

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Low
Rise

54.0 54.0 54.0 19,710 137 137 137 50,019
Hotel 128 128 128 46,720 335 335 335 122,349
Strip Mall 99.0 99.0 99.0 36,132 259 259 259 94,620
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Low
Rise

54.0 54.0 54.0 19,710 137 137 137 50,019
Hotel 128 128 128 46,720 335 335 335 122,349
Strip Mall 99.0 99.0 99.0 36,132 259 259 259 94,620
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Low Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 0
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
31 / 43
No Fireplaces 8
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.1.2. Mitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Low Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 0
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 8
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
17172 5,724 39,512 13,171 261

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
32 / 43
Summer Days day/yr 330

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 330

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Low Rise 25,237 204 0.0330 0.0040 214,348
Hotel 143,468 204 0.0330 0.0040 600,007
Strip Mall 25,734 204 0.0330 0.0040 18,570
Parking Lot 3,816 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Low Rise 23,699 204 0.0330 0.0040 214,348
Hotel 139,821 204 0.0330 0.0040 600,007
Strip Mall 25,491 204 0.0330 0.0040 18,570
Parking Lot 3,816 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
33 / 43

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Low Rise 241,776 0.00
Hotel 405,868 0.00
Strip Mall 230,291 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Low Rise 199,514 0.00
Hotel 357,935 0.00
Strip Mall 208,966 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Low Rise 5.85 —
Hotel 8.76 —
Strip Mall 3.26 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Low Rise 5.85 —
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
34 / 43
Hotel 8.76 —
Strip Mall 3.26 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Hotel Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 0.00 1.00
Hotel Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 4.00 18.0
Hotel Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
35 / 43
Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C & User Defined 1,500 < 0.005 2.50 2.00 10.0 Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 — 1.00
Hotel Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 — 1.00
Hotel Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
User Defined 1,500 1.80 4.00 2.00 18.0
Hotel Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
User Defined 1,500 < 0.005 7.50 2.00 20.0
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
User Defined 1,500 < 0.005 4.00 2.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 — 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
User Defined 1,500 < 0.005 7.50 2.00 20.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
36 / 43

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
37 / 43

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 21.3 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 5.00 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 25.5 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
38 / 43

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought 0 0 0 N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought 1 1 1 2
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
39 / 43
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 40.0
AQ-PM 8.24
AQ-DPM 52.8
Drinking Water 47.7
Lead Risk Housing 86.0
Pesticides 46.2
Toxic Releases 17.4
Traffic 37.8
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 25.6
Groundwater 14.3
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 69.4
Impaired Water Bodies 33.2
Solid Waste 63.7
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 50.5
Cardio-vascular 23.5
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
40 / 43
Low Birth Weights 32.3
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 78.1
Housing 10.8
Linguistic 76.9
Poverty 81.2
Unemployment 33.6

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 21.48081612
Employed 45.27139741
Median HI 32.13139997
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 20.73655845
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 1.873476197
Transportation —
Auto Access 60.64416784
Active commuting 10.09880662
Social —
2-parent households 15.21878609
Voting 57.33350443
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 12.44706788
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
41 / 43
Park access 20.78788656
Retail density 59.5534454
Supermarket access 39.30450404
Tree canopy 77.28730912
Housing—
Homeownership 11.13820095
Housing habitability 58.64237136
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 86.83433851 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 93.750802
Uncrowded housing 28.08931092
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 9.765173874
Arthritis 0.0
Asthma ER Admissions 45.7
High Blood Pressure 0.0
Cancer (excluding skin) 0.0
Asthma 0.0
Coronary Heart Disease 0.0
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 7.0
Cognitively Disabled 70.6
Physically Disabled 90.7
Heart Attack ER Admissions 67.5
Mental Health Not Good 0.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.0
Obesity 0.0
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
42 / 43
Pedestrian Injuries 66.3
Physical Health Not Good 0.0
Stroke 0.0
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 0.0
Current Smoker 0.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 0.0
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 36.4
Elderly 74.7
English Speaking 21.9
Foreign-born 64.2
Outdoor Workers 22.1
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 75.0
Traffic Density 28.9
Traffic Access 0.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 72.7
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 61.8

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 47.0 Attachment 3 Exhibit A

SPRING ST MIXED USE Detailed Report, 7/30/2023
43 / 43
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 23.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Total site acreage ~0.5 acres
Construction: Construction Phases Site previously developed. No site prep or demo required. Estimated 14-mo const period. Grading will require ~750 cy export. All other assumptions based on model defaults.

Construction: Architectural Coatings Includes use of low-VOC int/ext paints Operations: Vehicle Data Based on a total of 281 trips/day derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project.

Operations: Water and Waste Water Based on defaults
Attachment 3 Exhibit A

(805) 316-0101
895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6, Morro Bay, CA 93442

MEMORANDUM
Date: July 8, 2023
To: Katie Banister and Brian Cowen, City of Paso Robles From: Michelle Matson and Joe Fernandez, CCTC
Subject: 1745 Spring Street, Paso Robles – Transportation Analysis This memorandum summarizes the transportation impact analysis of the proposed wine tasting, boutique hotel, and residential facility on Spring Street in the City of Paso Robles. The project would construct a 24,836 square foot building including 16 hotel rooms, eight one-bedroom units, and 3,109 square feet of retail.

The proposed project is expected to have a less-than-significant impact on VMT. We recommend the following:
 Install a bulb-out on the southwest corner of Spring Street/18th Street.  Restrict parking on the southern side of 18th Street east of the access alley.  Install no parking signs for vehicles over six feet high in the two angled parking spaces west of and closest to the access alley.
 Modify no parking zone for bus stop as needed.
 Replace existing school warning sign.
 Install pedestrian warning signs on the southeast corner of Spring Street/18th Street.

The project site plan and recommendations are attached.

CEQA ANALYSIS
Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and safety were analyzed consistent with recently mandated changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and state Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidance.

The City’s 2022 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines Supplement provides VMT and safety thresholds consistent with OPR guidance. The Supplement notes that projects resulting in a net decrease in regional VMT would have a less than significant impact, and that retail and hotel projects may have a significant impact if they cause a net increase in regional VMT. Individual components of mixed-use projects can be analyzed individually or combined.

Projects may have a significant impact if they exacerbate an existing high-priority or similar safety location, introduce a design feature that substantially increases hazards, or propose features that do not meet City design standards.

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
The project impact on VMT was estimated using the SLOCOG TDM. Table 1 presents regional VMT with and without the project.

Attachment 4
- Central Coast Transportation ~'Consulting ~
Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning
. ·-......~.,,...-._.:., .. --- .,...,, .,,--_ ___. ------ ./~ Exhibit A

1745 Spring Street, Paso Robles – Transportation Analysis 2 Central Coast Transportation Consulting July 8, 2023
Table 1: Vehicle Miles Traveled
The addition of the project lowers regional VMT, so no further VMT analysis is warranted. The project would not have a VMT impact.

PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
The Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition was used to estimate the project trip generation as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Project Trip Generation
The proposed project would generate 281 net new vehicle trips per weekday, including 17 AM peak hour trips and 33 PM peak hour trips. This is below the threshold triggering traffic capacity analysis.

COLLISION HISTORY
Collision data was obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for Spring Street, and 18th Street in the vicinity of the project between 2018 and 2022. Four collisions were reported at the Spring Street/18th Street intersection as summarized below.
 Two rear-end collisions involving three northbound vehicles.  One broadside collision involving two southbound vehicles.  One head-on collision involving a southbound left turning vehicle and a northbound through vehicle.

No collisions reported near the intersection involved drivers entering or exiting 18th Street west of Spring Street and there are no recommendations.

Scenario Regional VMT
Baseline No Project 8,991,742
Baseline With Project 8,991,496
Change -246
Source: SLOCOG Travel Demand Model, CCTC, 2023
Vehicle Miles Traveled
Daily
Land Use Size Total In Out Total In Out Total
Multifamily Housing1 8 DU 54 1 2 3 3 1 4
Hotel2 16 Rooms 128 4 3 7 5 4 9
Retail3 3.109 KSF 169 4 3 7 17 17 34
-70 0 0 0 -7 -7 -14
281 9 8 17 18 15 33

3. Assumed 40% PM peak hour pass-by consistent with Shopping Plaza. Peak hour pass-by trips multiplied by a factor of 5 to determine daily pass-by trips. No internal capture was assumed.

2. ITE Land Use Code #822 Strip Retail Plaza. Average rates used for Daily and AM. Fitted curve equation used for PM.

Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total New Vehicle Trips
Pass-by Trips (Retail)
4 DU = Dwelling Unit; SF = Square Feet; ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers.

Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed. and Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Ed.

1. ITE Land Use Code #220, Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise). Average rates used based on data cluster.

2. ITE Land Use Code #310, Hotel. Average rates used based on data cluster.

Attachment 4 Exhibit A

1745 Spring Street, Paso Robles – Transportation Analysis 3 Central Coast Transportation Consulting July 8, 2023

SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE CIRCULATION
The current site is vacant. The project proposes all access via the alley between Spring Street and Oak Street south of 18th Street. All other existing driveways on the project frontage will be removed. At the intersection of Spring Street/18th Street, there are four existing ladder crosswalks with a pedestrian bulb-out on the northwest corner. We recommend the project construct a bulb-out on the southwest corner to reduce the crosswalk distances and improve pedestrian access.

Street features including landscaping, utility poles, street furniture, signs, and parked vehicles can inhibit sight distance in urban areas. The stopping sight distance is met along 18th Street and the City of Paso Robles does not have corner sight distance standards at driveways. Per California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) guidance, “At all intersections, one stall length on each side measured from the crosswalk or end of curb return should have parking prohibited. A clearance of six feet measured from the curb return should be provided at alleys and driveways.” There is currently six feet or more of no parking west of the alley. We recommend six feet of no parking be installed east of the alley on the south side of 18th Street.

We also recommend installing no parking signs restricting vehicles over six feet high for the two eastern angled parking spaces west of the alley on the south side of 18th Street and that the no parking zone for the bus stop on Spring Street be modified as needed.

In addition, we recommend the project install pedestrian warning signs on the southeast corner of Spring Street/18th Street for northbound traffic and replace the existing school warning sign for southbound traffic just south of the project site.

The project site plan and recommendations are attached.

ATTACHMENTS
Project Site Plan and Recommendations

REFERENCES
California Department of Transportation. May 2020. Vehicle Miles Traveled-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide.
_____. 2014, Revision 6. California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

City of El Paso De Robles. 2017. Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. _____. 2018. General Plan Circulation Element.
_____. 2013. Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. _____. 2022. Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines Supplement.

Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). 2021. Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. _____. 2017. Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition.

The Natelson Company, Inc. 2001. Employment Density Study Summary Report.

Attachment 4 Exhibit A

July 2023
1745 Spring Street, Paso Robles Project Site Plan and Recommendations Spring Street 18th StreetPROJECT
SITE
Install pedestrian warning
signs (W11-2 & W16-7P)
Install bulb-out
Existing pedestrian warning
signs and bulbout
Install 6' no
parking zone.

Install modified
R28D (CA) signs.

Replace existing school
sign with SW24-3 (CA)
Oak Street
Existing school warning sign
LEGEND

SIGN (EXISTING)

SIGN (PROPOSED)
N
Not to Scale
Modify bus no
parking zone
as needed.

Attachment 4
PARKING•

VEHICLES
OYER 6' HIGH
- Central Coast T ransportation~ o'ffiltmg
Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning
··--~·--....
~~ --- ---- /~
AHEAD
Exhibit A

Attachment 5
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 1 of 9
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Project File No./Name: P22-0076 / Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed Use Approving Resolution No.: by: Planning Commission City Council Date:

The following environmental mitigation measures were either incorporated into the approved plans or will be incorporated into the conditions of approval. Each and every mitigation measure listed below has been found by the approving body indicated above to lessen the level of environmental impact of the project to a level of non-significance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that it has been completed.

Explanation of Headings:

Type: ............................................................ Project, ongoing, cumulative Monitoring Department or Agency: ........ Department or Agency responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure Shown on Plans: .........................................When a mitigation measure is shown on the plans, this column will be initialed and dated.

Verified Implementation: ..........................When a mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated.

Remarks: ...................................................... Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information.

Mitigation Measure
PD22-11 / CUP23-07 / RZN23-01 / P22-0076
(Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed Use)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AES-1. Exterior light fixtures installed by the applicant for the project shall be downcast light with shielding
included so the light source is at least 2 inches above the bottom of the shield.

Project City of Paso
Robles
Community
Development
Department
(CDD)
AES-2. The applicant shall limit parking lot illumination to no more than 0.5 foot-candles in a uniform pattern
(no more than 3:1 (max/min) ratio).

Project CDD
AQ-1. The applicant shall reduce the amount of
disturbed area where possible.

Project CDD
□
Exhibit A

Attachment 5
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 2 of 9
Mitigation Measure
PD22-11 / CUP23-07 / RZN23-01 / P22-0076
(Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed Use)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AQ-2. During construction activities, the applicant shall use water trucks, SLOAPCD-approved dust
suppressants, or sprinkler systems in sufficient
quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the
site and from exceeding 20 percent opacity for greater
than 3 minutes in any 60-minute period. The applicant
shall increase watering frequency whenever wind
speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water
should be used whenever possible. The applicant shall
use an APCD-approved dust suppressant where possible
to reduce the amount of water used for dust control.

For a list of suppressants, see Section 4.3 of the CEQA Air Quality Handbook.

Project CDD
AQ-3. The applicant shall spray all dirt stockpile areas daily or cover with tarps or other dust barriers as
needed.

Project CDD
AQ-4. The applicant shall pave all roadways, driveways, and frontage improvements as soon as possible. The
building pad shall be laid as soon as possible after
grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.

Project CDD
AQ-5. The applicant shall cover all dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials hauled by truck or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical
distance between the top of load and top of truck or
Project CDD
Exhibit A

Attachment 5
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 3 of 9
Mitigation Measure
PD22-11 / CUP23-07 / RZN23-01 / P22-0076
(Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed Use)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
trailer) in accordance with California Vehicle Code
Section 23114.

AQ-6. During construction the applicant shall install and operate track-out prevention devices (any device or
combination of devices that are effective at preventing sand or soil that adheres to and/or agglomerates on the exterior surfaces of motor vehicles and/or equipment
(including tires) that may then fall onto any highway or street as described in California Vehicle Code Section
23113 and California Water Code 13304) at all
designated access points so that tracked out soils do
not accumulate on paved roadways. The applicant shall
require all employees, subcontractors, and others
exiting the project site to use designated access points.

Rumble strips, steel plates, and other track out
prevention devices shall be periodically cleaned.

Project CDD
AQ-7. The applicant shall identify permanent dust
control measures in the landscape plan, which shall be
implemented as soon as possible following completion
of any soil disturbing activities.

Project CDD
AQ-8. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be
reworked at dates greater than one month after initial
grading should be sown with a fast germinating, noninvasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established.

Project CDD
Exhibit A

Attachment 5
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 4 of 9
Mitigation Measure
PD22-11 / CUP23-07 / RZN23-01 / P22-0076
(Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed Use)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AQ-9. The applicant shall stabilize all disturbed soil
areas not subject to revegetation using approved
chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods
approved in advance by the San Luis Obispo Air
Pollution Control District.

Project CDD
AQ-10. The applicant shall limit vehicle speed for all
construction vehicles to 15 mph on any unpaved
surface on the construction site.

Project CDD
AQ-11. The applicant shall sweep streets at the end of
each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water
shall be used where possible. Roads shall be prewetted prior to sweeping.

Project CDD
AQ-12. The applicant shall not burn vegetative
material.

Project CDD
AQ-13. The contractor or builder shall designate a
person or persons to monitor the fugitive dust
emissions and enhance the implementation of the
measures as necessary to minimize dust complaints,
reduce visible emissions below 20 percent opacity, and
to prevent the transport of dust off-site. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work
may not be in progress. The name and telephone
number of such persons shall be provided to the City of Paso Robles Engineering Department and the San Luis
Project CDD
Exhibit A

Attachment 5
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 5 of 9
Mitigation Measure
PD22-11 / CUP23-07 / RZN23-01 / P22-0076
(Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed Use)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
Obispo Air Pollution Control District Compliance
Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork, or demolition.

AQ-14. All contractors or builders working on the site
shall maintain all construction equipment in proper
tune according to manufacturer’s specifications.

Project CDD
AQ-15. Any heavy-duty (50 horsepower or greater)
diesel-fueled construction equipment used by all
contractors or builders working on the site shall exceed, at a minimum, Air Resources Board Tier 2 certified
engines, or cleaner, off-road heavy-duty diesel engines and comply with State Off-Road Regulations.

Project CDD
AQ-16. All contractors or builders working on the site
shall not idle any diesel equipment when not in use.

The applicant shall post signs in the designated queuing areas and/or job sites to remind drivers and operators
of the idling prohibition.

Project CDD
AQ-17. To the extent locally available, all contractors or builders working on the site shall use electrified or
alternatively powered construction equipment.

Project CDD
AQ-18. The applicant shall use low volatile organic
compound (VOC) content paints (i.e., 50 grams VOC per
liter, or less).

Project CDD
Exhibit A

Attachment 5
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 6 of 9
Mitigation Measure
PD22-11 / CUP23-07 / RZN23-01 / P22-0076
(Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed Use)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AQ-19. To the extent locally available, the applicant
shall use prefinished building materials or materials
that do not require the onsite application of
architectural coatings.

Project CDD
AQ-20. The applicant shall meet or exceed California
Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) Tier 2
standards for reducing cement use in concrete mix as
allowed by local ordinance and conditions.

Project CDD
AQ-21. The applicant shall notify the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District and The Christian Life Center of the potential for increased emissions associated with
the project at least 30 days before the start of grading.

Project CDD
AQ-22. Ongoing, the project shall not include any
backup electrical generation that would exceed San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District air quality
thresholds.

Project CDD
AQ-23. Ongoing, if any land use with the potential to
create noxious odors is proposed on the site, the
applicant shall obtain approval from the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District for proximity to sensitive receptors.

Project San Luis
Obispo Air
Pollution
Control
District
(SLOAPCD)
CUL-1. In the event that buried or otherwise unknown
cultural resources are discovered during construction
work in the area of the find shall be suspended and the Project CDD
Exhibit A

Attachment 5
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 7 of 9
Mitigation Measure
PD22-11 / CUP23-07 / RZN23-01 / P22-0076
(Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed Use)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
City of Paso Robles shall be contacted immediately, and appropriate mitigations measures shall be developed by
qualified archeologist or historian if necessary, at the developers expense.

CUL-2. In the event human remains are found on the
project site during construction or during archaeological work, the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, shall immediately
notify the San Luis Obispo County Coroner’s office by
telephone. No further excavation or disturbance of the
discovery or any nearby area reasonably suspected to
overlie adjacent remains (as determined by the
qualified archaeologist and/or the Native American
monitor) shall occur until the coroner has made the
necessary findings as to origin and disposition. If the coroner recognizes the remains to be Native American,
he or she shall contact the Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC would
make a determination as to the Most Likely
Descendent.

Project SLO County
Coroner,
Native
American
Heritage
Commission
GHG-1. The applicant shall construct the project with
adequate electrical panel capacity to support an allelectric retrofit of the development Project CDD
GHG-2. The applicant shall construct the project with
appropriate conduit necessary to support the retrofit of Project CDD
Exhibit A

Attachment 5
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 8 of 9
Mitigation Measure
PD22-11 / CUP23-07 / RZN23-01 / P22-0076
(Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed Use)
Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
the development to meet battery charging needs when
transportation is all-electric.

HAZ-1. Before issuance of a grading permit, the
applicant shall prepare a soils management plan subject to approval by the City and the Central Coast Regional
Water Quality Control Board. Construction activity shall be subject to the requirements of the soils
management plan.

Project Central Coast
Regional
Water Quality
Control Board
(RWQCB) and
CDD
HAZ-2. Before issuance of a grading permit, the
applicant shall notify the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board and the San Luis Obispo County
Environmental Health Services Division of the project
including a statement that residual soil and
groundwater pollution underlie the property and
nearby properties. The applicant shall apply for and
receive permission from the listed agencies before
grading or other construction activities shall be
permitted to commence.

Project CDD, RWQCB,
SLO County
Environmental
Health
N-1. The outdoor courtyard and rooftop patio shall be
open to tenants of the residential units and hotel units on the property only. Ongoing, amplified music and
other nightclub activities shall be prohibited in the
outdoor areas of the project unless a noise study is
conducted and adequate mitigation is provided to
preclude violations of the noise ordinance.

Ongoing CDD
Exhibit A

Attachment 5
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 9 of 9
(add additional measures as necessary)
Explanation of Headings:

Type: ............................................................ Project, ongoing, cumulative Monitoring Department or Agency: ........ Department or Agency responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure Shown on Plans: .........................................When a mitigation measure is shown on the plans, this column will be initialed and dated.

Verified Implementation: ..........................When a mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated.

Remarks: ...................................................... Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information.

Exhibit A

Friday, August 2, 2024
City of El Paso De Robles
Community Development Department
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA 93446
Att.: Katie Banister, Associate Planner
Re: Spring Street Affordable Housing - 1745 Spring Street Dear Ms. Banister:

Thank you for contacting the Tribal Elders’ Council for the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians.

At this time, the Elders’ Council requests no further consultation on this project; however, if supplementary literature reveals additional information, or if the scope of the work changes, we kindly ask to be notified.

If you decide to have the presence of a Native American monitor in place during ground disturbance to assure that any cultural items unearthed be identified as quickly as possible, please contact our office or Chumash of the project area.

Thank you for remembering that at one time our ancestors walked this sacred land.

Sincerely Yours,
Crystal Mendoza
Administrative Assistant | Cultural Resources
Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians | Tribal Hall
(805) 325-5537
Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians
Tribal Elders’ Council
P.O. Box 517◆ Santa Ynez ◆ CA ◆ 93460
Phone: (805)688-7997 ◆ Fax: (805)688-9578
Exhibit B

[email protected]
Exhibit B

Printed on Recycled Paper

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
August 1, 2024
Katie Banister
Associate Planner
City of Paso Robles
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA 93446
[email protected]
RE: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SPRING STREET AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND MIXED-USE PROJECT, DATED JULY 10, 2024 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER 2024070401
Dear Katie Banister,
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) received a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Springs Street Affordable Housing and Mixed-Use Project (Project). The proposed Project is a planned development of a vacant infill site in downtown Paso Robles with a mixed-use building including 3,346 square feet of commercial space, 16 hotel rooms, and 8 residential apartments After review of the MND, DTSC has the following comments for consideration:

1. The Project and future CEQA documents should acknowledge the potential for historic or future activities on or near the Project site to result in the release of hazardous wastes/substances on the Project site. In instances in which releases have occurred or may occur, further studies should be carried out to delineate the nature and extent of the contamination, and the potential threat to public health and/or the environment should be evaluated.

Exhibit C

Katie Banister
August 1, 2024

2. DTSC recommends the City of Paso Robles enter into DTSC’s Standard Voluntary Agreement (SVA) program so a proper evaluation of the Project is completed. If entering into an SVA with DTSC, the FLUXX portal link is provided and the page also has a link to the FLUXX User Guide that can help you navigate the system. You will need to create a new profile and once in the system, click “Start a Request for Lead Agency Oversight Application.” DTSC recommends that once the SVA is signed, a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report (PEA Report) be submitted for DTSC review. The PEA Report shall summarize all existing data and provide an evaluation of the possible risk to current and future users of the site. If you have any questions about the application portal, please contact the DTSC Brownfield Coordinator Gregory Shaffer or contact the Application Portal Inbox

3. DTSC recommends that all imported soil and fill material should be tested to assess any contaminants of concern meet screening levels as outlined in DTSC's Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) Guidance Manual.

Additionally, DTSC advises referencing the DTSC Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material Fact Sheet if importing fill is necessary. To minimize the possibility of introducing contaminated soil and fill material there should be documentation of the origins of the soil or fill material and, if applicable, sampling be conducted to ensure that the imported soil and fill material are suitable for the intended land use. The soil sampling should include analysis based on the source of the fill and knowledge of the prior land use. Additional information can be found by visiting DTSC’s Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) webpage.

DTSC believes the City of Paso Robles must address these comments to determine if any significant impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) will occur and, if necessary, avoid significant impacts under CEQA.

DTSC appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND for the Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed-Use Project. Thank you for your assistance in protecting Exhibit C

Katie Banister
August 1, 2024

California’s people and environment from the harmful effects of toxic substances. If you have any questions or would like any clarification on DTSC’s comments, please respond to this letter or via email for additional guidance.

Sincerely,
Tamara Purvis
Associate Environmental Planner
CEQA Unit-Permitting – HWMP
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
Exhibit C

Katie Banister
August 1, 2024

cc: (via email)
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse
[email protected]
George Garcia
Architect
Garcia Architecture and Design
[email protected]
Scott Wiley
Associate Governmental Program Analyst
CEQA Unit-Permitting/HWMP
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
Dave Kereazis
Associate Environmental Planner
CEQA Unit-Permitting/HWMP
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
Exhibit C

08/06/2024
City: Paso Robles - Community Development
Katie Banister
1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446, USA
[email protected]
Construction Site Well Review (CSWR) ID: 1013069
Assessor Parcel Number(s): 008283012
Property Owner(s): George Garcia
Project Location Address: 1745 Spring Street Paso Robles, California 93446 Project Title: Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed Use Project (P22-0076) Public Resources Code (PRC) § 3208.1 establishes well reabandonment responsibility when a previously plugged and abandoned well will be impacted by planned property development or construction activities. Local permitting agencies, property owners, and/or developers should be aware of, and fully understand, that significant and potentially dangerous issues may be associated with development near oil, gas, and geothermal wells.

The California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) has received and reviewed the above referenced project dated 8/6/2024. To assist local permitting agencies, property owners, and developers in making wise land use decisions regarding potential development near oil, gas, or geothermal wells, the Division provides the following well evaluation.

The project is located in Monterey County, within the boundaries of the following fields:

N/A
There are approximately one hundred-sixty or more plugged and abandoned oil and gas prospect wells located throughout the Paso Robles Area. These wells, most of which are labeled as “Dry Hole” in

Exhibit D

CalGEM records, have the potential to be impacted by development activities. The approximate locations and records for these wells can be viewed at:
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/calgem/Pages/WellFinder.aspx Our records indicate there are no known oil or gas wells located within the project boundary as identified in the application.
• Number of wells Not Abandoned to Current Division Requirements as Prescribed by Law and Projected to Be Built Over or Have Future Access Impeded by this project: 0 • Number of wells Not Abandoned to Current Division Requirements as Prescribed by Law and Not Projected to Be Built Over or Have Future Access Impeded by this project: 0 • Number of wells Abandoned to Current Division Requirements as Prescribed by Law and Projected to Be Built Over or Have Future Access Impeded by this project: 0 • Number of wells Abandoned to Current Division Requirements as Prescribed by Law and Not Projected to Be Built Over or Have Future Access Impeded by this project: 0 The Division categorically advises against building over, or in any way impeding access to, oil, gas, or geothermal wells. Impeding access to a well could result in the need to remove any structure or obstacle that prevents or impedes access including, but not limited to, buildings, housing, fencing, landscaping, trees, pools, patios, sidewalks, roadways, and decking. Maintaining sufficient access is considered the ability for a well servicing unit and associated necessary equipment to reach a well from a public street or access way, solely over the parcel on which the well is located. A well servicing unit, and any necessary equipment, should be able to pass unimpeded along and over the route, and should be able to access the well without disturbing the integrity of surrounding infrastructure.

There are no guarantees a well abandoned in compliance with current Division requirements as prescribed by law will not start leaking in the future. It always remains a possibility that any well may start to leak oil, gas, and/or water after abandonment, no matter how thoroughly the well was plugged and abandoned. The Division acknowledges wells plugged and abandoned to the most current Division requirements as prescribed by law have a lower probability of leaking in the future, however there is no guarantees that such abandonments will not leak.

The Division advises that all wells identified on the development parcel prior to, or during, development activities be tested for liquid and gas leakage. Surveyed locations should be provided to the Division in Latitude and Longitude, NAD 83 decimal format. The Division expects any wells found leaking to be reported to it immediately.

Exhibit D

Failure to plug and reabandon the well may result in enforcement action, including an order to perform reabandonment well work, pursuant to PRC § 3208.1, and 3224.

PRC § 3208.1 give the Division the authority to order or permit the re-abandonment of any well where it has reason to question the integrity of the previous abandonment, or if the well is not accessible or visible. Responsibility for re-abandonment costs may be affected by the choices made by the local permitting agency, property owner, and/or developer in considering the general advice set forth in this letter. The PRC continues to define the person or entity responsible for reabandonment as:

1. The property owner - If the well was plugged and abandoned in conformance with Division requirements at the time of abandonment, and in its current condition does not pose an immediate danger to life, health, and property, but requires additional work solely because the owner of the property on which the well is located proposes construction on the property that would prevent or impede access to the well for purposes of remedying a currently perceived future problem, then the owner of the property on which the well is located shall obtain all rights necessary to reabandon the well and be responsible for the reabandonment.

2. The person or entity causing construction over or near the well - If the well was plugged and abandoned in conformance with Division requirements at the time of plugging and abandonment, and the property owner, developer, or local agency permitting the construction failed either to obtain an opinion from the supervisor or district deputy as to whether the previously abandoned well is required to be reabandoned, or to follow the advice of the supervisor or district deputy not to undertake the construction, then the person or entity causing the construction over or near the well shall obtain all rights necessary to reabandon the well and be responsible for the reabandonment.

3. The party or parties responsible for disturbing the integrity of the abandonment - If the well was plugged and abandoned in conformance with Division requirements at the time of plugging and abandonment, and after that time someone other than the operator or an affiliate of the operator disturbed the integrity of the abandonment in the course of developing the property, then the party or parties responsible for disturbing the integrity of the abandonment shall be responsible for the reabandonment.

No well work may be performed on any oil, gas, or geothermal well without written approval from the Division. Well work requiring approval includes, but is not limited to, mitigating leaking gas or other fluids from abandoned wells, modifications to well casings, and/or any other re-abandonment work. The Division also regulates the top of a plugged and abandoned well's minimum and maximum depth below final grade. CCR §1723.5 states well casings shall be cut off at least 5 feet but no more than 10 feet below grade. If any well needs to be lowered or raised (i.e. casing cut down or casing riser added) to meet this regulation, a permit from the Division is required before work can start.

Exhibit D

The Division makes the following additional recommendations to the local permitting agency, property owner, and developer:

1. To ensure that present and future property owners are aware of (a) the existence of all wells located on the property, and (b) potentially significant issues associated with any improvements near oil or gas wells, the Division recommends that information regarding the above identified well(s), and any other pertinent information obtained after the issuance of this letter, be communicated to the appropriate county recorder for inclusion in the title information of the subject real property.

2. The Division recommends that any soil containing hydrocarbons be disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal laws. Please notify the appropriate authorities if soil containing significant amounts of hydrocarbons is discovered during development.

As indicated in PRC § 3106, the Division has statutory authority over the drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of oil, gas, and geothermal wells, and attendant facilities, to prevent, as far as possible, damage to life, health, property, and natural resources; damage to underground oil, gas, and geothermal deposits; and damage to underground and surface waters suitable for irrigation or domestic purposes. In addition to the Division's authority to order work on wells pursuant to PRC §§ 3208.1 and 3224, it has authority to issue civil and criminal penalties under PRC §§ 3236, 3236.5, and 3359 for violations within the Division's jurisdictional authority. The Division does not regulate grading, excavations, or other land use issues.

If during development activities, any wells are encountered that were not part of this review, the property owner is expected to immediately notify the Division's construction site well review engineer in the Northern district office, and file for Division review an amended site plan with well casing diagrams.

The District office will send a follow-up well evaluation letter to the property owner and local permitting agency.

Should you have any questions, please contact me at (805) 937-7246 or via email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Trey Powell
Northern District Deputy
cc: Katie Banister - Plan Checker

Exhibit D

Attachment 3
CC Ordinance XXXX N.S. Page 1 of 4
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX N.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

AMENDING THE CITY ZONING MAP TO ADD A RESORT/LODGING OVERLAY DISTRICT TO 1745 SPRING STREET, APN 008-283-012
WHEREAS, Tobin James, represented by George Garcia, has applied for Rezone 23-01 to extend the Resort/Lodging Overlay District to allow Development Plan 22-11 and Conditional Use Permit 23-07 to construct a mixed-use building with 3,346 square feet of commercial space including a winetasting room, 16 hotels rooms, and 8 residential units (P22-0076) (collectively, the “project”); and WHEREAS, the project is located at 1745 Spring Street; and WHEREAS, the site has a General Plan land use designation of Mixed Use (MU-8) and is in the T3-F (Flex) zoning district where residential units are an allowed use, winetasting rooms are a conditionally allowed use when located on Spring Street, and hotels are not an allowed use; and WHEREAS, the maximum density allowed in the T3-F zoning district is 12 density units/acre, or 6 density units for the 0.48-acre site; and
WHEREAS, the project includes 1 residential unit restricted to a very-low-income household (17% of the total allowed density units), which qualifies the project to a 50% density bonus and up to 3 concessions consistent with California Government Code Section 65915; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a 33% density bonus and an exception from the City’s height standards and an exception to its parking requirements both as concessions; and WHEREAS, the applicant has separately requested the City Council rezone the property to include the Resort/Lodging Overlay District to allow a hotel where it would otherwise be prohibited; and WHEREAS, the City Council is the review authority for all projects involving rezoning; and WHEREAS, the project was first reviewed by the Development Review Committee on January 30, 2023.

At that time, staff described the architecture of the project as in the International Style. The Development Review Committee determined the design of the project was not compatible with the vision of the downtown and requested the applicant work with staff to prepare a more compatible project; and WHEREAS, the project was redesigned and presented to the Development Review Committee for the second time on September 18, 2023. The majority of Development Review Committee members preferred the redesigned project, which is more similar to the Downtown Commercial architectural style included in the Architectural Guidelines of the Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan. The Development Review Committee requested staff provide more information about the State’s requirements for affordable housing density bonuses especially as it relates to parking concessions and whether additional angled parking can be placed on 18th Street adjacent to the project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Statutes and Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq., and the City’s Procedures for Implementing CEQA, an

Attachment 3
CC Ordinance XXXX N.S. Page 2 of 4
initial study and mitigated negative declaration (SCH 2024070401) were prepared for the project and were circulated between July 11, 2024 and August 9, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 10, 2024, considered the facts as presented in the staff report prepared for this project, accepted public testimony regarding the project, and on a vote of 6-0, adopted Resolution PC 24-023, recommended the City adopt Ordinance XXXX to approve Rezone 23-01; and
WHEREAS, the City Council introduced this ordinance for first reading on October 1, 2024, and considered the facts as presented in the staff report prepared for this project, and accepted public testimony regarding the ordinance.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Based on the facts and analysis presented to it, including all written and oral testimony, the City Council hereby finds and determines:
a. The rezone is consistent with the following General Plan policies:
(1) Land Use Policy 1A, Action Item 2, which is to “allow projects in the Mixed Use land use category and/or in Specific Plan areas to be developed with more than one land use” because the rezone facilitates mixed-use development that combines hotel accommodations, residential units, and commercial space within a single project. (2) Land Use Policy 2B, Action Item 4, which is to “Continue to enhance the downtown as a priority.” The rezone directly contributes to this policy by enabling a development that adds new hospitality and commercial services to the Downtown area, thus further enhancing its appeal as a destination for visitors and residents alike. (3) Land Use Policy 2C, which is to “Preserve/enhance downtown and the historic Vine Street neighborhood through adherence to established guidelines.” This project aligns with this policy by integrating the new development within the established character of the Downtown area.
(4) Land Use Policy 2H, which is “Continue to revitalize the historic Downtown. Focus efforts on developing Downtown Paso Robles as the specialty retail, government, office, cultural, conference, and entertainment center of the City and North County region.” The rezone supports this policy by facilitating a mixed-use development that includes hospitality components, which in turn contributes to the vibrancy and economic vitality of the Downtown area.
(5) Land Use Policy 2H, Action Item 2, which is “Promote a vibrant Downtown using the following methods: Implement the City’s Economic Development Strategy . . . ”.“ This rezone promotes Downtown vibrancy by enabling the development of a mixed-use project that aligns with the City’s Economic Development Strategy and encouraging economic growth through new business opportunities and enhanced tourist accommodations.
(6) Land Use Policy 2I, which is “Encourage infill development as a means of accommodating growth, while preserving open space areas, reducing vehicle miles

Attachment 3
CC Ordinance XXXX N.S. Page 3 of 4
traveled, and enhancing livability/quality of life. Infill includes: Mixed use development in the Downtown and/or in areas within walking distance to transit, employment centers, and commercial services where the environmental impacts of the development would be minimized . . .”. The proposed rezone furthers this policy by facilitating a mixed-use development within the Downtown area. b. The rezone is consistent with the intent of the Resort/Lodging overlay district, which is “to provide a means through which the city can consider and selectively provide appropriate locations for resort hotels, motels, bed and breakfast inns, and similar forms of visitorserving lodging (along with related accessory/ancillary land uses). This overlay would assist the City in achieving the goal in the adopted economic development strategy to develop El Paso de Robles into an “end destination” tourist attraction by encouraging consideration of appropriate locations for resorts, lodging and related/ancillary land uses (without providing the broader range of permitted and conditionally permitted land uses and the accompanying neighborhood and environmental impacts that are associated with a commercial or industrial general plan or zoning designation). The R/L land use overlay can be established on any property.”
c. The rezone is supported by adequate street and highway infrastructure that can handle the anticipated increase in traffic, especially considering that certain amenities within the development will be exclusively used by hotel guests and residential tenants, thereby minimizing the impact on local traffic. The Resort/Lodging Overlay rezone will further introduce visitor-serving lodging uses, such as hotels, that are compatible with existing land uses in the T-3F zone, such as bed and breakfast inns established through issuance of a CUP.
d. The rezone is consistent with the Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan as it supports the Plan’s goal of promoting pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use neighborhoods by integrating hotel, residential, and commercial uses in a single project. This mixed-use approach aligns with Goals 1 and 4 of this Specific Plan by introducing a variety of building forms and uses that enhance the area’s character, support a pedestrian-friendly street network, and foster a balanced community where residents can live, work, and enjoy amenities within a single neighborhood. The inclusion of hotel rooms and a winetasting room also supports Goal 5 of the Specific Plan by expanding economic opportunities within the hospitality sector for residents.
e. The rezone will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, or be injurious or detrimental to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City because the project introduces a carefully planned mixed-use development that aligns with the established character of the neighborhood. The inclusion of hotel rooms and residential units under the Resort/Lodging Overlay provides a balanced mix of uses that complement existing properties and enhance local amenities without overwhelming the neighborhood or deviating from its current zoning intent. The design and operation will adhere to all relevant regulations and conditions to further ensure it fits harmoniously within the neighborhood while supporting its economic and social vitality.

Attachment 3
CC Ordinance XXXX N.S. Page 4 of 4
Section 3. The City Council hereby ordains as follows: the Resort/Lodging Overlay District shall be expanded to include 1745 Spring Street (APN 008-283-012) as shown in attached Exhibit A of this Ordinance. All of the standards, regulations, and requirements of the Resort/Lodging Overlay District shall apply to this property.

Section 4. The project, as mitigated by Mitigated Negative Declaration SCH 2024070401, will not result in a significant impact on the environment. The City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles hereby finds and determines that all potential environmental impacts of the project have been fully analyzed in the MND. No new or additional mitigation measures are required. There is no substantial evidence in the administrative record to support a fair argument that the Project may result in any significant environmental impacts beyond those analyzed and mitigated in the proposed MND.

Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage and adoption as provided by Government Code section 36397.

Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published at least five (5) days prior to the meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted and shall post a certified copy of the proposed Ordinance in the Office of the City Clerk. Within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of the Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause a summary of the Ordinance to be published, including the vote for and against the same, in accordance with Government Code Section 36937.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on October 1, 2024, for first reading by the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles, and adopted on November 5, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk
Exhibit A. Resort/Lodging Zoning Overlay Map

City of El Paso de Robles
I -0
er \ ,.__
Cl)
>
�
�
I
4?�tard Creek
/, I l
er
,.__
Cl)
>
c::

V,
r- • � City Limits , ....
1:1 Area to be Added (APN 008-238-012)
� Resort Lodging Overlay (21.18B.)
Project Name: ResortlodgingBoundaryAmendment
Date Saved: 9/23/2024 12:06 PM
'
I
!2291
""CJ
er
C
E
Vl
�
u
Adobe Rd
,
I
.--, ""CJ
er
I J �-- I I QJ ,-••-••�r Rd•-••-•�
., ' I l .i,
•
•
I
•
I
-
-
·
•
•
.-- Paso Robles
Municipal
Airport
The Links Jt
Vista del
Hombre l
Bea�-R•••
I
•
•
I
•
Scott St
""CJ
a::
0 a,
;,;-
l/l
�
17th St
Meadowlark� - • •
I
•
·--
• -o �
1: �
Dry Creel<. Rd • -• �
... , Cl.
•
1:
�
"'
Cl)
Vl
Vl
::,
�
"'LL
.......:::===1
18th St
\ J
::J
lO
Vl
,...

Mill Rd
\
� Miles
0 0.38 0.75 1.5
Exhibit A

Attachment 4
RESOLUTION 24-XXX (B)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASO ROBLES APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN 22-11 FOR THE SPRING STREET AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND MIXED-USE PROJECT

INCLUDING BUILDING HEIGHT AND ON-SITE PARKING-RELATED CONCESSIONS FOR AN AFFORDABLE

HOUSING DENSITY BONUS AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 23-07 FOR A WINETASTING ROOM
1745 SPRING STREET / APN: 008-283-012
DEVELOPMENT PLAN 22-11
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 23-07
APPLICANT – TOBIN JAMES
WHEREAS, Tobin James, represented by George Garcia, has applied for Development Plan 22-11, Conditional Use Permit 23-07, and Rezone 23-01, a request for approval to construct a mixed-use building with 3,346 square feet of commercial space including a winetasting room, 16 hotels rooms, and 8 residential units (P22- 0076) (collectively, the “project”); and
WHEREAS, the project is located at 1745 Spring Street; and WHEREAS, the project site has a General Plan land use designation of Mixed Use (MU-8) and is in the T3-F (Flex) zoning district where residential units are an allowed use, winetasting rooms are a conditionally allowed use when located on Spring Street, and hotels are not an allowed use; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested the City Council rezone the property to extend the Resort/Lodging Overlay District to include the project site located at 1745 Spring Street (APN 008-283-012); and WHEREAS, the maximum density allowed in the T3-F zoning district is 12 density units/acre, or 6 density units for the 0.48-acre site; and
WHEREAS, the project includes 1 residential unit restricted to a very-low-income household (17% of the allowed density units), which entitles the project to a 50% density bonus and up to 3 concessions consistent with California Government Code Section 65915; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a 33% density bonus and an exception from the City’s height standards and an exception to its parking requirements both as concessions; and WHEREAS, the site was originally developed as a Chevron gas station in 1963. The station was demolished in 2003. Four leaking underground tanks were remediated on the property between 2003 and 2020; and WHEREAS, the project was first reviewed by the Development Review Committee on January 30, 2023. At that time, staff described the architecture of the project as in the International Style. The Development Review Committee determined the design of the project was not compatible with the vision of the downtown and requested the applicant work with staff to prepare a more compatible project; and

Attachment 4
WHEREAS, the project was redesigned and presented to the Development Review Committee for the second time on September 18, 2023. The majority of Development Review Committee members preferred the redesigned project, which is more similar to the Downtown Commercial architectural style included in the Architectural Guidelines of the Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan. The Development Review Committee requested staff provide more information about the State’s requirements for affordable housing density bonuses especially as it relates to parking concessions and whether additional angled parking can be placed on 18th Street adjacent to the project; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Statutes and Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq., and the City’s Procedures for Implementing CEQA, an initial study and mitigated negative declaration (SCH 2024070401) were prepared for the project and were circulated between July 11, 2024 and August 9, 2024; and WHEREAS, the project was scheduled for a public hearing at the Planning Commission on August 13, 2024, but was continued to August 27, 2024, and subsequently continued until September 10, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 10, 2024, and considered the facts as presented in the initial study and mitigated negative declaration and staff report prepared for this project, accepted public testimony regarding the project, and on a vote of 5-1 adopted Resolution PC 24- 024, recommending the City Council approve Development Plan 22-11 and Conditional Use Permit 23-07; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on October 1, 2024, and considered the facts as presented in the initial study and mitigated negative declaration and staff report prepared for this project and accepted public testimony regarding the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Based upon the facts and analysis presented in the staff report, public testimony received, and subject to the conditions listed below, the Planning Commission makes the following findings:

Development Plan Findings
a. The design and intensity of the proposed development plan is consistent with the goals and policies established by the general plan; the zoning code, particularly the purpose and intent of the zoning district in which the development project is located; and all other adopted codes, policies, standards, and plans of the city. The intent of the Resort/Lodging overlay district is to “provide a means through which the city council (and, through the development review process, the planning commission) can consider and selectively provide appropriate locations resort hotels, motels, bed and breakfast inns, and similar forms of visitor-serving lodging (along with related accessory/ancillary land uses).” With the application of the Resort/Lodging district, hotels are an allowed use. As such, upon approval of the request for a rezone to Resort/Lodging district, this property will be subject to the standards and regulations of the Resort/Lodging district.

The parking deficit is a product of an affordable housing density bonus concession. The

Attachment 4
parking deficit will be partially remedied by the elimination of several driveway approaches and striping for new angled parking on 18th Street adjacent to the project. b. The proposed development plan will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience and general welfare of the person residing or working in the neighborhood, or be injurious or detrimental to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the city because, as mitigated, air quality, noise, and hazardous materials impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. c. The proposed development plan accommodates the aesthetic quality of the city as a whole, especially where development will be visible from gateways to the city and scenic corridors because it is a well-designed project with adequate landscaping. As conditioned, the project is generally consistent with the design guidelines for a Main Street Commercial style building.
d. The proposed development plan is compatible with, and is not detrimental to, surrounding land uses and improvements, provides appropriate visual appearance, and contributes to the mitigation of any environmental and social (e.g., privacy) impact because as mitigated, no amplified music is permitted in the outdoor areas. The height of the building is similar to the new buildings of the Paso Market Walk to the north of the project and are appropriate on an arterial street.
e. The proposed development plan is compatible with existing scenic and environmental resources such as hillsides, stream courses, oak trees, vistas, historic buildings and structures because the site is flat and fully disturbed with no native oak trees or stream courses.
f. The proposed development plan contributes to the orderly development of the city as a whole because it put residences and tourist-serving uses near the downtown, transit lines, schools, restaurants, and stores.
g. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect the policies, spirit and intent of the general plan, applicable specific plans, the zoning code and all other adopted codes, policies and plans of the city because with the application of the Resort/Lodging district, hotels are an allowed use. The parking reduction concession that results in a parking deficit will be partially remedied by elimination of several driveway approached and striping of new angled parking on 18th Street adjacent to the project. h. The proposed project maintains and enhances significant natural resources on the site because there are no significant natural resources on the site, which was previously developed as a gas station.
i. The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to, and blend in with, the character of the site and surrounding area, and would not have an adverse effect on the public views from nearby roads and other public vantage points because the project includes an affordable housing density bonus concession for building height and the project is adjacent to the Paso Market Walk which includes buildings of similar height.

Attachment 4
j. The proposed project's design and density of the developed portion of the site is compatible with the established character and scale of surrounding development and would not be a disharmonious or disruptive element to the neighborhood because the intensity is allowed as a state affordable housing density bonus project. k. The development would be consistent with the purpose and intent of this chapter and would not be contrary to the public health, safety, and welfare because as mitigated, it will address all potential environmental impacts.
l. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the project will include 2 affordable housing density bonus concessions as follows and as further detailed in the corresponding staff report of this Resolution:
(1) Height exception for portions of the building exceeding 36 feet (“Height Concession”); and
(2) Parking reduction of 5 parking spaces to address the deficit of required onsite parking spaces for the project (“Parking Concession”).
m. No substantial evidence exists at this time to support written findings to the contrary, as required under Government Code Section 65915(d)(1), to deny the Height Concession and Parking Concession.
n. Granting the Height Concession and Parking Concession will not have a specific, adverse impact (a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions) upon public health and safety or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources.
o. Granting the Height Concession and Parking Concession would not be contrary to state or federal law.

Conditional Use Permit Findings
p. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the winetasting room will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood setting because the conditions of approval prohibit any outdoor seat to be at least 50 feet from the southern property line where a funeral home is located, and mitigation measures prohibit amplified sound outdoors unless a noise study and appropriate noise mitigation are provided.
q. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed winetasting room will not be injurious or detrimental to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City because conditions and mitigation measures prohibit amplified sound outdoors unless a noise study and appropriate noise mitigation are provided.
r. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed winetasting room will not be detrimental to the City’s efforts to revitalize the downtown because it is a touristoriented business located in the downtown area.

Attachment 4
s. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed winetasting room, under the circumstances of the particular case, would be compatible with the goals, policies, and intent of the Zoning Ordinance specifically for the Resort/Lodging overlay district, which is intended for lodging and other tourist-serving businesses.

Section 3: The project, as mitigated by Mitigated Negative Declaration SCH 2024070401, will not result in a significant impact on the environment. All potential environmental impacts of the project have been fully analyzed in the MND. There is no substantial evidence in the administrative record to support a fair argument that the project may result in any significant environmental impacts beyond those analyzed and mitigated in the proposed MND.

Section 4. The City Council approves Development Plan 22-11 and Conditional Use Permit 23-07, subject to the conditions of approval and standards set forth in the following Exhibits:

EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
A Site-Specific Conditions of Approval
B Standard Conditions of Approval
C Project Plans
Section 5. Development Plan 22-11 and Conditional Use Permit 23-07 shall be effective the same day Rezone 23-01 becomes effective.

APPROVED THIS 1
st day of October 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk

Exhibit A
Site Specific Conditions of Approval – PD22-11 and CUP23-07 Planning Division Conditions:

1. The applicant/developer shall comply with the checked standard Conditions of Approval, “Exhibit B”.

NOTE: In the event of conflict or duplication between standard conditions and site-specific conditions, the site-specific condition shall supersede the standard condition.

2. The project shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the conditions of approval, and it shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the following Exhibits:

EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
A Site-Specific Conditions of Approval
B Standard Conditions of Approval
C Project Plans

3. Approval of this project is valid for a period of two (2) years from date of approval. Unless construction permits have been issued and site work has begun, the approval of Planned Development 22-11 and Conditional Use Permit 23-07 shall expire on October 1, 2026. The Planning Commission may extend this expiration date if a time extension application has been filed with the City along with the required fee before the expiration date.

4. Any condition imposed by the City Council in approving this Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit may be modified or eliminated, or new conditions may be added by the City’s legislative bodies, provided that the City’s legislative bodies shall first conduct a public hearing in the same manner as required for the granting of the original permits, as necessary.

5. The applicant will ensure the continued affordability of all very low-income rental units that qualified the applicant for the award of the density bonus for a period of no less than 55 years, as required by Government Code section 65915 et seq. Before issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any part of the project, the applicant will execute and record whatever deed restriction, regulatory agreement, restrictive covenant, or other instrument the City Attorney deems appropriate to implement this requirement.”

6. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall enter into a density bonus housing agreement in conformance with the density bonus approved herein and Municipal Code Chapter

21.16L, in a form deemed appropriate and approved by the City Attorney. The agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding on all parcels.

7. The project includes the following 2 affordable housing desity bonus concessions:
a. Height exception for portions of the building exceeding 36 feet as shown in Exhibit C; and b. Parking reduction of 5 parking spaces to address the deficit of required onsite parking spaces for the project.

Exhibit A

8. Ongoing, the roof mounted mechanical equipment shall not exceed the height of its screening wall unless demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Development Review Committee that the equipment will not be seen from offsite.

9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall merge all underlying legal lots into one.

10. Prior to issuance of building permits for signage, final sign details shall be reviewed by the Development Review Committee.

11. Prior to issuance of building and/or encroachment permits, the street tree shall be changed to a species included on the City’s list of approved street trees as appropriate for tree wells and parkways.

12. Prior to the issuance of building permits the size, location, and design of the garbage enclosure shall be approved by the City Solid Waste and Recycling Manager.

13. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the fire service connection shall be screened to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.

14. Before issuance of a building permit and ongoing, the applicant shall inset the face of glass for all windows at least 2 inches from the face of the exterior wall in which it is installed as shown in Sheet A2.1 of Exhibit C.

15. Ongoing, the applicant shall use only clear and smooth glass in the storefront windows as shown on Sheet A2.1 of Exhibit C.

16. Ongoing, the applicant shall not include horizontally sliding windows in the project as shown on Sheets A3.1 and A3.2 of Exhibit C.

17. Ongoing, the general public, which is any person not a current resident or registered hotel guest, shall not enter or use the hotel accessory amenities, including but not limited to, the outdoor courtyard and rooftop patio.

18. Ongoing, no food service of any kind is permitted on the rooftop patio.

19. Ongoing, no bar or other alcohol service shall be located or occur on the rooftop patio.

20. Ongoing, the property owner shall notify in writing all new long-term residential tenants they will not have a designated on-site parking space before a lease is signed.

Engineering Division Conditions:

21. Before issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall provide a complete Stormwater Control Plan in conformance with the City Stormwater Technical Guide.

Exhibit A

22. Before occupancy of the building, the Applicant shall replace HMA pavement on 18th Street from edge of gutter to centerline of street across the 18th Street frontage.

23. Before occupancy of the building, the Applicant shall provide traffic striping for diagonal parking across the 18th Street frontage in conformance with City Standards and as directed by the City Engineer.

24. Before occupancy of the building, the Applicant shall construct street improvements to both 18th and Spring Streets as shown on the preliminary plans, including parkway landscaping.

25. Before occupancy of the building, the Applicant shall construct the alley across the project frontage to the City A-7 standard.

26. Before occupancy of the building, the Applicant shall provide upgrades to the City street infrastructure as determined in the project traffic study.

27. Before issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall provide water demands for the project to verify water meter and water service(s) sizing.

28. Before occupancy of the building, the Applicant shall upsize City water mains between 17th and 18th Streets, if required by estimated project water demands.

29. Before occupancy of the building, the Applicant shall replace the existing 6” vitrified clay sewer line in the alley from 17th Street to 18th Street with 8" PVC sewer main in conformance with City standards.

Mitigation Measures:

AES-1. Exterior light fixtures installed by the applicant for the project shall be downcast light with shielding included so the light source is at least 2 inches above the bottom of the shield.

AES-2. The applicant shall limit parking lot illumination to no more than 0.5 foot-candles in a uniform pattern (no more than 3:1 (max/min) ratio).

AQ-1. The applicant shall reduce the amount of disturbed area where possible.

AQ-2. During construction activities, the applicant shall use water trucks, SLO Air Pollution Control District-approved dust suppressants, or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site and from exceeding 20 percent opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any 60-minute period. The applicant shall increase watering frequency whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible. The applicant shall use an APCD-approved dust suppressant where possible to reduce the amount of water used for dust control. For a list of suppressants, see Section 4.3 of the CEQA Air Quality Handbook.

Exhibit A
AQ-3. The applicant shall spray all dirt stockpile areas daily or cover with tarps or other dust barriers as needed.

AQ-4. The applicant shall pave all roadways, driveways, and frontage improvements as soon as possible. The building pad shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.

AQ-5. The applicant shall cover all dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials hauled by truck or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between the top of load and top of truck or trailer) in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 23114.

AQ-6. During construction the applicant shall install and operate track-out prevention devices (any device or combination of devices that are effective at preventing sand or soil that adheres to and/or agglomerates on the exterior surfaces of motor vehicles and/or equipment (including tires) that may then fall onto any highway or street as described in California Vehicle Code Section 23113 and California Water Code 13304) at all designated access points so that tracked out soils do not accumulate on paved roadways. The applicant shall require all employees, subcontractors, and others exiting the project site to use designated access points. Rumble strips, steel plates, and other track out prevention devices shall be periodically cleaned.

AQ-7. The applicant shall identify permanent dust control measures in the landscape plan, which shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities.

AQ-8. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established.

AQ-9. The applicant shall stabilize all disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District.

AQ-10. The applicant shall limit vehicle speed for all construction vehicles to 15 mph on any unpaved surface on the construction site.

AQ-11. The applicant shall sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water shall be used where possible. Roads shall be pre-wetted prior to sweeping.

AQ-12. The applicant shall not burn vegetative material.

AQ-13. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the fugitive dust emissions and enhance the implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize dust complaints, reduce visible emissions below 20 percent opacity, and to prevent the transport of dust off-site. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the City of Paso Robles Engineering Department and the San Luis Obispo Air

Exhibit A
Pollution Control District Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork, or demolition.

AQ-14. All contractors or builders working on the site shall maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer’s specifications.

AQ-15. Any heavy-duty (50 horsepower or greater) diesel-fueled construction equipment used by all contractors or builders working on the site shall exceed, at a minimum, Air Resources Board Tier 2 certified engines, or cleaner, off-road heavy-duty diesel engines and comply with State Off-Road Regulations.

AQ-16. All contractors or builders working on the site shall not idle any diesel equipment when not in use. The applicant shall post signs in the designated queuing areas and/or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the idling prohibition.

AQ-17. To the extent locally available, all contractors or builders working on the site shall use electrified or alternatively powered construction equipment.

AQ-18. The applicant shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) content paints (i.e., 50 grams VOC per liter, or less).

AQ-19. To the extent locally available, the applicant shall use prefinished building materials or materials that do not require the onsite application of architectural coatings.

AQ-20. The applicant shall meet or exceed California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) Tier 2 standards for reducing cement use in concrete mix as allowed by local ordinance and conditions.

AQ-21. The applicant shall notify the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District and The Christian Life Center of the potential for increased emissions associated with the project at least 30 days before the start of grading.

AQ-22. Ongoing, the project shall not include any backup electrical generation that would exceed San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District air quality thresholds.

AQ-23. Ongoing, if any land use with the potential to create noxious odors is proposed on the site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District for proximity to sensitive receptors.

CUL-1. In the event that buried or otherwise unknown cultural resources are discovered during construction work in the area of the find shall be suspended and the City of Paso Robles shall be contacted immediately, and appropriate mitigations measures shall be developed by qualified archeologist or historian if necessary, at the developers expense.

CUL-2. In the event human remains are found on the project site during construction or during archaeological work, the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, shall immediately notify the San Luis Obispo County Coroner’s office by telephone. No further excavation or disturbance of the discovery or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains (as determined by the qualified

Exhibit A
archaeologist and/or the Native American monitor) shall occur until the coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition. If the coroner recognizes the remains to be Native American, he or she shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC would make a determination as to the Most Likely Descendent.

GHG-1. The applicant shall construct the project with adequate electrical panel capacity to support an all-electric retrofit of the development
GHG-2. The applicant shall construct the project with appropriate conduit necessary to support the retrofit of the development to meet battery charging needs when transportation is allelectric.

HAZ-1. Before issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare a soils management plan subject to approval by the City and the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Construction activity shall be subject to the requirements of the soils management plan.

HAZ-2. Before issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall notify the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board and the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Services Division of the project including a statement that residual soil and groundwater pollution underlie the property and nearby properties. The applicant shall apply for and receive permission from the listed agencies before grading or other construction activities shall be permitted to commence.

N-1. The outdoor courtyard and rooftop patio shall be open to tenants of the residential units and hotel units on the property only. Ongoing, amplified music and other nightclub activities shall be prohibited in the outdoor areas of the project unless a noise study is conducted and adequate mitigation is provided to preclude violations of the noise ordinance.

T-1. Before occupancy of the building, the applicant shall install a bulb-out on the southwest corner of Spring Street and 18th Street.

T-2. Before occupancy of the building, the applicant shall remove and restrict parking on the southern side of 18th Street adjacent to the access alley to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

T-3: Before occupancy of the building, the applicant shall replace the existing school warning sign to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

T-4: Before occupancy of the building, the applicant shall install pedestrian warning signs on the southeast corner of Spring Street and 18th Street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Exhibit B

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

STANDARD DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
Planned Development 22-11 Conditional Use Permit 23-07
Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Tract Map
Approval Body: City Council Dateof Approval: October 1, 2024 Applicant: Tobin James Location: 1745 Spring Street
APN: 008-283-012
The following conditions that have been checked are standard conditions of approval for the above referenced project by the applicant/owner of the property in question. The checked conditions shall be complied with in their entirety before the project can be finalized, unless otherwise specifically indicated. In addition, there may be site specific conditions of approval that apply to this project in the resolution.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - The applicant shall contact the Community Development Department, (805) 237-3970, for compliance with the following conditions:

A. GENERAL CONDITIONS – PD/CUP:

1. This project approval shall expire on October 1, 2026 unless a time extension request is filed with the Community Development Department, or a State mandated automatic time extension is applied prior to expiration.

2. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans and unless specifically provided for through the Planned Development and/or Conditional Use Permit process shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Zoning Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Specific Plans.

3. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of El Paso de Robles and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of El Paso de Robles, its officers, employees, or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of El Paso de Robles concerning this project, including but not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, Development Review Committee, Community Development Director, or City Planner. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. Applicant understands and acknowledges that City is under no

Exhibit B
obligation to defend any legal actions challenging the City’s actions with respect to the project.

4. Any site-specific condition imposed by the City Council in approving this project (PD 22-11 and CUP23-07) may be modified or eliminated, or new conditions may be added, provided that the Planning Commission shall first conduct a public hearing in the same manner as required for the approval of this project. No such modification shall be made unless the Commission finds that such modification is necessary to protect the public interest and/or neighboring properties, or, in the case of deletion of an existing condition, that such action is necessary to permit reasonable operation and use for this approval.

5. The site shall be kept in a neat manner at all times and the landscaping shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition.

6. All signs shall be subject to review and approval as required by El Paso de Robles Municipal Code Chapter 21.19 and shall require a separate application and approval prior to installation of any sign.

7. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a landscape and irrigation plan consistent with Chapter 21.22B of the Municipal Code (Landscape and Irrigation Ordinance), shall be submitted for City review and approval. The plan needs to be designed in a manner that utilizes drought tolerant plants, trees and ground covers and minimizes, if not eliminates the use of turf. The irrigation plan shall utilize drip irrigation and limit the use of spray irrigation. All existing and/or new landscaping shall be installed with automatic irrigation systems.

8. A reciprocal parking and access easement and agreement for site access, parking, and maintenance of all project entrances, parking areas, landscaping, hardscape, common open space, areas and site lighting standards and fixtures, shall be recorded prior to or in conjunction with the Final Map. Said easement and agreement shall apply to all properties, and be referenced in the site Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs).

9. All outdoor storage shall be screened from public view by landscaping and walls or fences in accordance with Section 21.21.110 of the Municipal Code.

10. For commercial, industrial, office or multi-family projects, all refuse enclosures are required to provide adequate space for recycling bins. The enclosure shall be architecturally compatible with the primary building. Gates shall be view obscuring and constructed of durable materials. Check with Paso Robles Waste and Recycle to determine the adequate size of enclosure based on the number and size of containers to be stored in the enclosure.

11. For commercial, industrial, office or multi-family projects, all existing and/or new ground-mounted appurtenances such as air-conditioning condensers, electrical transformers, backflow devices etc., shall be screened from public view through the

Exhibit B
use of decorative walls and/or landscaping subject to approval by the Community Development Director or their designee. Details shall be included in the building plans.

12. All existing and/or new roof appurtenances such as air-conditioning units, grease hoods, etc. shall be screened from public view. The screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed of compatible materials to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or their designee. Details shall be included in the building plans.

13. All existing and/or new lighting shall be shielded so as to be directed downward in such a manner as to not create off-site glare or adversely impact adjacent properties.

The style, location and height of the lighting fixtures shall be submitted with the building plans and shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Director or their designee.

14. All walls/fences and exposed retaining walls shall be constructed of decorative materials which include but are not limited to splitface block, slumpstone, stuccoed block, brick, wood, crib walls or other similar materials as determined by the Development Review Committee, but specifically excluding precision block.

16. It is the property owner’s responsibility to ensure that all construction of private property improvements occur on private property. It is the owner’s responsibility to identify the property lines and ensure compliance by the owner’s agents.

17. Any existing Oak trees located on the project site shall be protected and preserved as required in City Ordinance No.835 N.S., Municipal Code No. 10.01 “Oak Tree Preservation”, unless specifically approved to be removed. An Oak tree inventory shall be prepared listing the Oak trees, their disposition, and the proposed location of any replacement trees required. In the event an Oak tree is designated for removal, an approved Oak Tree Removal Permit must be obtained from the City, prior to removal.

18. No storage of trash cans or recycling bins shall be permitted within the public rightof-way.

19. Prior to recordation of the map or prior to occupancy of a project, all conditions of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Developer Director or their designee.

20. Two sets of the revised Planning Commission approved plans incorporating all Conditions of Approval, standard and site specific, shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits.

21. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
Development Review Committee shall approve the following:

Planning Division Staff shall approve the following:

Exhibit B
a. A detailed site plan indicating the location of all structures, parking layout, outdoor storage areas, walls, fences, light fixtures and trash enclosures;
b. A detailed landscape plan;
c. Detailed building elevations of all structures indicating materials, colors, and architectural treatments;
d. Other:

B. GENERAL CONDITIONS – TRACT/PARCEL MAP:

1. In accordance with Government Section 66474.9, the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, or its agent, officers and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding brought within the time period provided for in Government Code section 66499.37, against the City, or its agents, officers, or employees, to attack, set aside, void, annul the City's approval of this subdivision.

The City will promptly notify subdivider of any such claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense thereof.

2. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and/or Articles Affecting Real Property Interests are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and/or the City Attorney.

They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the affected City Departments.

3. The owner shall petition to annex residential Tract (or Parcel Map)________ into the City of Paso Robles Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 for the purposes of mitigation of impacts on the City’s Police and Emergency Services Departments.

4. Street names shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission, prior to approval of the final map.

5. The following areas shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, Homeowners’ Association, or other means acceptable to the City:
________________________________________________________ ****************************************************************************** ENGINEERING DIVISION- The applicant shall contact the Engineering Division, (805) 237- 3860, for compliance with the following conditions:

All conditions marked are applicable to the above referenced project for the phase indicated.

C. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK:

1. The applicant shall enter into an Engineering Plan Check and Inspection Services Agreement with the City.

Exhibit B
D. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT:

1. Prior to approval of a grading plan, the developer shall apply through the City, to FEMA and receive a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) issued from FEMA. The developer's engineer shall provide the required supporting data to justify the application.

2. Any existing Oak trees located on the project site shall be protected and preserved as required in City Ordinance No. 553, Municipal Code No. 10.01 "Oak Tree Preservation" , unless specifically approved to be removed. An Oak tree inventory shall be prepared listing the Oak trees, their disposition, and the proposed location of any replacement trees required. In the event an Oak tree is designated for removal, an approved Oak Tree Removal Permit must be obtained from the City, prior to its removal.

3. A complete grading and drainage plan shall be prepared for the project by a registered civil engineer and subject to approval by the City Engineer. The project shall conform to the City’s Storm Water Discharge Ordinance.

4. A Soils and/or Geology Report providing technical specifications for grading of the site shall be prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer.

5. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan per the State General Permit for Strom Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity shall be provided for any site that disturbs greater than or equal to one acre, including projects that are less than one acre that are part of a larger plan of development or sale that would disturb more than one acre.

E. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT:

1. All off-site public improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and acceptance. The improvements shall be designed and constructed to the City Standard Details and Specifications or as approved by the City Engineer.

2. The applicant shall submit a composite utility plan signed as approved by a representative of each public utility.

3. Landscape and irrigation plans for the public right-of-way shall be incorporated into the improvement plans and shall require approval by the Parks/Facilities Maintenance Supervisor and the Community Development Department.

4. In a special Flood Hazard Area as indicated on a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) the owner shall provide an Elevation Certificate in accordance with the National Flood Insurance program. This form must be completed by a land surveyor or civil engineer licensed in the State of California.

Exhibit B
F. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:

The Planning Commission has made a finding that the fulfillment of the construction requirements listed below are a necessary prerequisite to the orderly development of the surrounding area.

1. The applicant shall pay any current and outstanding fees for Engineering Plan Checking and Construction Inspection services.

2. All public improvements are completed and approved by the City Engineer, and accepted by the City Council for maintenance.

3. The owner shall offer to dedicate and improve the following street(s) to the standard indicated:

Street Name City Standard Drawing No.

4. If, at the time of approval of the final map, any required public improvements have not been completed and accepted by the City the owner shall be required to enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.

Bonds required and the amount shall be as follows:

Performance Bond...............100% of improvement costs.

Labor and Materials Bond........50% of performance bond.

5. If the existing City street adjacent to the frontage of the project is inadequate for the traffic generated by the project, or will be severely damaged by the construction, the applicant shall excavate the entire structural section and replace it with a standard half-width street plus a 12' wide travel lane and 8' wide graded shoulder adequate to provide for two-way traffic.

6. If the existing pavement and structural section of the City street adjacent to the frontage of the project is inadequate, the applicant shall provide a new structural section from the proposed curb to the edge of pavement and shall overlay the existing paving to centerline for a smooth transition.

7. Due to the number of utility trenches required for this project, the City Council adopted Pavement Management Program requires a pavement overlay on _________________ along the frontage of the project.

8. The applicant shall install all utilities. Street lights shall be installed at locations as required by the City Engineer. All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or within the project shall be relocated underground except for electrical lines 77 kilovolts or greater. All utilities shall be extended to the boundaries of the project.

Exhibit B

9. The owner shall offer to dedicate to the City the following easement(s). The location and alignment of the easement(s) shall be to the description and satisfaction of the City Engineer:
a. Public Utilities Easement;
b. Water Line Easement;
c. Sewer Facilities Easement;
d. Landscape Easement;
e. Storm Drain Easement.

10. The developer shall annex to the City's Landscape and Lighting District for payment of the operating and maintenance costs of the following:
a. Street lights;
b. Parkway/open space landscaping;
c. Wall maintenance in conjunction with landscaping;
d. Graffiti abatement;
e. Maintenance of open space areas.

11. For a building with a Special Flood Hazard Area as indicated on a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), the developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program. This form must be completed by a lands surveyor or civil engineer licensed in the State of California.

12. All final property corners shall be installed prior to final occupancy.

13. All areas of the project shall be protected against erosion by hydro seeding or landscaping.

14. All construction refuse shall be separated (i.e. concrete, asphalt concrete, wood gypsum board, etc.) and removed from the project in accordance with the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element.

15. Electronic record drawings, signed by the engineer of record, shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to the final inspection. An electronic autocad drawing file registered to the California State Plane – Zone 5 / NAD83 projected coordinate system, units in survey feet, shall also be provided.
****************************************************************************** PASO ROBLES DEPARTMENT AND EMERGENCY SERVICES- The applicant shall contact the Department of Emergency Services, (805) 227-7560, for compliance with the following conditions:

G. GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. Prior to the start of construction:

Exhibit B
Plans shall be reviewed, approved and permits issued by Emergency Services for underground fire lines.

Applicant shall provide documentation to Emergency Services that required fire flows can be provided to meet project demands.

Prior to delivery of combustible materials, fire hydrants shall be installed and operative to current, adopted edition of the California Fire Code. (PRMC - A fire hydrant must be located within 150’ of the FDC and connection to it must not block collector or arterial roadways).

Prior to delivery of combustible materials, a based access road sufficient to support the department’s fire apparatus (Engines-43.5k lbs., Truck-69.5k lbs.) shall be constructed and maintained for the duration of the construction phase of the project.

Access roads shall be at least twenty (20) feet in width with at least thirteen (13) feet, six (6) inches of vertical clearance. All driveway and access roads shall be 10% or less in slope unless approved by PRFD.

Truck access road shall be at least twenty (26) feet in width with at least thirteen (13) feet, six (6) inches of vertical clearance. Minimum set-back 15’, maximum 30’.

Project shall provide a secondary access fire road approved by PRFD.

2. Provide central station monitored fire sprinkler system for all residential, commercial and industrial buildings that require fire sprinklers in current, adopted edition of the California Building Code, California Fire Code and El Paso de Robles Municipal Code.

Plans shall be reviewed, approved and permits issued by Emergency Services for the installation of fire sprinkler systems.

3. If required by the Fire Chief, provide on the address side of the building if applicable:

Fire alarm annunciator panel location to be approved by PRFD.

Provide a Knox box key entry box or system.

Fire department connection (FDC) location and access path must be approved by PRFD.

Address Numbers; size, location, and contrast shall be approved by PRFD.

4. Provide class 1 standpipe system(s) with 2 ½” hose connections to supply water for use by fire department personnel at each floor in accordance to NFPA 14 for all residential, commercial and industrial buildings that are or exceed three (3) stories in height or above 30 feet. Location shall be at the entrance/exit way of the stairway system. Travel distance greater than 200’ feet will compel additional standpipe system(s) in each stairwell.

5. Provide temporary turn-around to current City Engineering Standard for phased construction streets that exceed 150 feet in length.

Exhibit B

6. Motorized Gates blocking fire access require a separate PRFD and must include Knox Key Switch access.

7. Fire extinguisher placement shall be approved by PRFD.

8. Landscape plant selections shall be fire resistive within 30 feet of structures.

9. Landscape trees must not project into required vertical clearance of the fire access lanes.

10. Provide permanent turn-around to current City Engineering Standard for driveway/access roads that exceed 150 feet in length.

11. Project shall comply with all requirements in current, adopted edition of California Fire Code and Paso de Robles Municipal Code.

12. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy:

Final inspections shall be completed on all underground fire lines, fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems and chemical hood fire suppression systems.

A site pre-fire plan shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Marshal.

Contact the Paso Robles Fire Prevention Office for exact requirements.

A Final Fire Walkthrough inspection shall be completed on all buildings.

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

Exhibit C

1 From: Jeff Carr <>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 6:33 PM
To: Katie Banister
Subject: Re: Comments for DRC Sept 18, 2023, Item 2
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
OK. Thanks. I will look at this information. --- It just seemed to me that the DRC's "concerns" are not enough. They can be concerned all day--and that won't get more parking on that property. Why didn't city staff and DRC suggest changes be made to bring parking up to the requirements? Else--if the developer is asking for concessions, then detail them so people can understand exactly what they want. It all seemed vague and uncertain. You mention the low-income senior deed restriction on 1 unit--Yes, I remember that being mentioned but I didn't see the direct connection between that and the lack of parking. You mention on 1 chart that it 'entitles the project to 2 concessions/incentives--but not exactly what that would be.

Would it allow the developer to be short as much parking as they are now? Or maybe that entitles them to 2 less parking spaces ONLY. But they want the zoning change too. Nothing was made clear yesterday.

From my point of view--the meeting didn't really serve much of a purpose---when the requests (concessions) aren't clear AND the DRC doesn't address the problems other than expressing concerns.

At this point--I see this development needing significant change. Nothing presented yesterday at the DRC meeting told me otherwise.
-Jeff
On 9/19/2023 3:00 PM, Katie Banister wrote:

Mr. Carr,
Thank you for your comments; they will be included with the staff report to the Planning Commission and City Council, who will both review the project at upcoming meetings. Approval for this project will ultimately be up to the City Councill’s discretion.

We do not produce a staff report for any item under DRC consideration. We only provide the project plans and then a presentation of issues during the meeting. For complex items like the project at 1745 Spring Street, the DRC is a first look at the architecture and design of the project, which at times requires an overview of other issues that are relevant to a project. A full analysis of all issues will be included in the written staff report for Planning Commission and City Council.

For the Tobin James project yesterday, the DRC asked questions and made minor requests for more information to be provided at the future Planning Commission meeting. They did not request significant design changes (as they did for this project back in January). Like yourself, the DRC members are concerned about parking, for which the applicant has requested a concession due to the project including the dedication of a unit to a very low income household via a 55-year recorded deed restriction (12.5% of all residential units in the project). I would draw your attention to California GOV Attachment 5

2 Code Sections 65915-65918 (Density Bonuses and Other Incentives) for an understanding of the City’s obligation to approve concessions and incentives associated with projects that offer affordable units. This article is written in plain English and also includes a discussion of relevant case law, and may also be helpful: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/density_bonus_law_- _what_are_incentives_concessions_and_waivers.pdf?1667860893 The project is requesting the application of the Resort/Lodging Overlay District to only the subject property, which is not the larger effort to expand the Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan area (the HCOC recommendation). For more information about the Resort overlay, please see PRMC Chapter 21.18C.

I will include you in future notices for hearings for this project, which are tentatively scheduled for October and November. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or comments.

Sincerely,
KaƟe Banister
Associate Planner
City of Paso Robles
805-237-3970
805-227-7200 X7746 Direct
www.prcity.com
From: Jeff Carr <>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 7:41 AM
To: Planning <[email protected]>
Subject: Comments for DRC Sept 18, 2023, Item 2
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Hello,
I'm commenting on Item 2 of the DRC agenda for September 18, 2023; i.e., File #: P22-0076 / PD22-11 / CUP23-07 / RZN23-01 --- Tobin James project First--I request a copy of the city's presentation charts for this item. It's not clear to me why the information from those charts are not included early with agenda-- as they hold significant information related to the discussion item.

I was surprised by all the changes and concessions requested for this item. It's not clear how the requests are being defended, and that needs to be made more clear. The DRC all seemed to have concerns especially about parking, but I never heard any strong guidance regarding the items from the committee members.

From what I heard, the parking proposals for this development are unacceptable. I understand that parking requirements are minimal in the city, but not having at least 1 fixed 'on-property' parking space for each hotel room and residence seems irresponsible.

Even that might be inadequate, but it was my understanding that it is required as a minimum. If not, it should be. Anything less will only cause future conflict for tenants of this property, for the nearby neighborhood, and I expect for the city as well.

Attachment 5

3 And there are also staff parking requirements and also the needs of the commercial facilities that should be considered.

Then there is the requested zoning change. The only defense I heard is that it might be part of a proposal being worked for zoning changes in the area. That was unclear.

Perhaps this is in the HCOC effort. But the results of that effort, from my understanding, have not yet been fully vetted and reviewed. I understand they will be going to council-- but had hoped there would be another chance for a complete and comprehensive review with the Planning Commission and the public. I've yet to see public concerns of this effort addressed by the city; e.g., from the one and only workshop by HCOC. A draft of these proposed zoning changes should be on the website now for ongoing public review.

It's difficult to understand how a hotel with rooms and windows facing Spring Street, maybe the most traffic congested street in Paso Robles--is a good idea. Regardless, it's not clear that the request for a zoning waiver at this point has been adequately explained or defended.

Then there was discussion of the overall architecture. Of all in attendance, surprisingly it was the architect (from what I could tell) that seemed most critical of the current design.

I wanted to hear how the changes address the specific concerns regarding compatibility brought up by the DRC at the previous review--and as documented in those meeting minutes. It's not clear what if any modifications will be made in the design--but I didn't hear any strong guidance from the DRC on the matter.

Overall, at yesterday's meeting, it wasn't clear what recommendation or guidance was being offered by the DRC to the developers on this project. I feel it deserved more, and I will be watching for any subsequent review of this item at the DRC or the Planning Commission.

Jeff Carr--Paso Robles, CA
Attachment 5

1 From: Linda Colwell <>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 7:17 PM
To: Planning; Ty Lewis
Subject: 1745 Spring St.
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
I am confused.  Why would you consider rezoning for this project for a hotel?  Parking is inadequate .  Spring Street is now a steady stream of traffic.  Neighborhoods are close by. Isn’t there a  more appropriate place to build (another!!) hotel?   Why do we have regulations and then make exceptions so frequently on developments?   What happen to the intended park at this location.

Is there any section of our community that is safe from over developing?  The east side of town still has space yet you want to impact the west side by rezoning up to Olive Street.  What a waste of our historic side of town! Thank you for answering my concerns.

Linda Colwell
Sent from Mail for Windows
Attachment 6

COALITION PARTNERS:

Bike SLO County
Cal Poly State University
Caltrans District 5
City of San Luis Obispo
Community Action Partnership of SLO
First 5 of San Luis Obispo County
Los Osos Pickleball
Oceano Community Services District
SLO Council of Governments
SLO County Air Pollution Control District
SLO County Department Public Health
SLO County Parks and Recreation
SLO County YIMBY
SLO Legal Assistance Foundation
Smart Share Housing Solutions
RESOURCES:
www.slohealthcounts.org
Building Healthy Communities: Residential
Checklist
To enhance health with improvements to the built environment through collaboration, education, and policy guidance.
www.slohealthcounts.org/hcwg
August 9, 2024
To: [email protected]
ATTN: Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed-Use Project Dear Planning Commission members,
We are writing to you today, on behalf of the Healthy Communities Work Group, regarding the 1745 Spring Street Affordable Housing and Mixed-Use Project.

We are encouraged by the location of this project and the potential for alternative transportation options such as walking, biking, and transit, as the project is centrally located downtown, close to services, employment opportunities, and educational facilities, like the early HeadStart and Glen Speck Elementary School. As stated in the project’s 2023 Transportation Analysis, the report recommends measures to address the expected increase in pedestrian traffic in the area.i
The parcel was also identified in SLOCOG’s Housing Efficiency Analysis as an ‘efficient’ area for future development – the highest rating available.
ii The Housing Efficiency Analysis looks at three
factors: transportation access, water capacity, and wastewater capacity. These three factors were combined to identify areas that would best accommodate future housing based on current
conditions and readiness.

Beyond the location designated for this project, we also support it’s thoughtful multi-story, mixed-use design, which maximizes density and provides shared common space for residents. Research shows adults and youth are more likely to walk if they live in neighborhoods with high population density and mixed land use.
iii
Environments with shared common space can also promote wellbeing and feelings of social cohesion,iv combatting the harmful effects of social isolation.v We also support the inclusion of bicycle parking with the parcel, which may further promote physical activity among residents.vi
Given the site’s location and the inclusion of a hotel, there are concerns about whether the 1-bedroom units will be truly affordable.

All units are proposed to be less than 600 square feet, which may make the market-rate apartments more affordable by design. We are also pleased that the developer has included one deed-restricted 1- bedroom unit for very-low-income residents and hope that future projects will add more units that support residents at all income Attachment 7

To enhance health with improvements to the built environment through collaboration, education, and policy guidance.
www.slohealthcounts.org/hcwg
levels - in support of a vibrant community and Paso Robles’ larger Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) targets.
vii
Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Bob Jorgensen, Healthy Communities Work Group co-chair
Notes
i Tobin James, “CEQA Environmental Initial Study Checklist Form,” https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov
ii San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, “The Housing & Infrastructure Regional Framework,” https://slocog.org/programs/housing/housing-infrastructure-regionalframework iii
Healthy Communities Work Group, “Building Health Communities: Residential Checklist,” https://www.slohealthcounts.org/hcwg
iv Wan, et al. Underlying relationships between public urban green spaces and social cohesion: A systematic literature review - ScienceDirect v U.S. Surgeon General. Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-social-connectionadvisory.pdf. vi Healthy Communities Work Group, “Building Health Communities: Residential Checklist,”.
vii San Luis Obispo Council of Governments. Housing Dashboard. https://data-driveslocog.hub.arcgis.com/pages/housing.

Attachment 7

1010 Marsh St., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
(805) 546-8208 • FAX (805) 546-8641

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of San Luis Obispo,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident
of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of
eighteen years, and nor a party interested in rhe
above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk
of the printer of the New Times, a newspaper
of general circulation, printed and published
weekly in the City of San Luis Obispo, County
of San Luis Obispo, and which has been
adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by
the Superior Court of rhe County of San Luis
Obispo, State of California, under the date of
February 5, 1993, Case number CV72789: that
notice of which rhe annexed is a printed copy
(set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
°ll 11
in the year 2024.

I certify (or declare) under the the penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dared a
\ �
n Luis Obis? California, this day
---'-�+-- of �-err . 2024.

Kary Gray, New Times
AdrNn &. PrnoJU1/.N"I MG Admin/NTMG Offi,�/BUSINESS/Pl.hw Nonce./Ptod of Pub e

NOTICE OF

CITY COUNCIL

PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Paso Robles City Council will hold a Public Hearing to consider the following project Project Description: Development of a vacant lot m the downtown of Paso Robles with a mixed-use building including 3,346 square feet of commercial space including a winetasting room, 16 hotel rooms, and 8 residential apartments. The hearing will include introduction of an ordinance to rezone the property to include the Resorl/lodging Overlay District. The project includes a state affordable housing density bonus including concessions (RZN23·

01. PD22·11, CUP23•07, P22-0076)
Applicant George Garcia for Tobin James I '
location: 1745 Spring Street (APN 008·283-012)
CEQA Determination: In compliance w;th the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEOA), an initial study and mitigated negative declaration (SCH 2024070401) were prepared for the project and were circulated between July 11, 2024 and August 9, 2024. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures
Hearing Date: The City Council will hold a Public Hearing on October 1, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. at the Council Chamber/library Conference Center, 1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446.

The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on Tuesday, September 10, 2024 to consider the project and on a 6-0 vote recommended that the City Council adopt the mitigated negative declaration and approve RZN23·01, PD22·11, CUP23•07 (collectively P22•0076).

The public has the option to attend the meeting in person or to 1, panicipate remotely. To participate remotely, residents can livestream the meeting at www orcity comJyoutube and call (805)865-7276 to provide live public comment via telephone. The phone line will open just prior to the statt of the meeting.

Written
�
public comments can be submitted via email to�
or US Mail (submit early) to the City Clerk, 1000 Spring Street Paso Robles, CA 93446 provided that the comments are received prior to the time of the public hearing. Comments received prior to 12:00 noon on the day of the meeting will be posted as an addendum to the agenda. If submitting written comments, please note the agenda item by number or name.

Comments on the proposed application must be received prior to the time of the hearing to be considered by the City Council.

Challenge to the application in coutt will be limited to issues raised at the public hearings or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to, the public hearing.

Copies ol the project staff repott w,11 be available for review on the City's website �WWW orciJY com/meetings) on the Friday preceding the hearing. If you have any questions, please contact the Community Development Depattment at (805) 237-3970
September 19, 2024
,tember 19 - September 26, 2024 • New Times • 35
Attachment 8

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
“The Pass of the Oaks”
1000 SPRING STREET • PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA 93446 • www.prcity.com

AFFIDAVIT

OF MAIL NOTICES

PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICING
I, Marci Reynoso , employee of the City of El Paso de Robles, California, do hereby certify that the mail notices have been processed as required for the October 1, 2024, public hearing for P22-0076 / CUP23-07 / PD22-11 / RZN23-01 on this 20th of September, 2024.

City of El Paso de Robles
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Signed:

Marci Reynoso
Attachment 9

Council Agenda Report
From: Elizabeth Hull, City Attorney
Subject: Approval of Interim City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Paso Robles and Chris Huot and Amendment of the Master Pay Schedule CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Date: October 1, 2024
Facts

1. City Manager Ty Lewis is on an extended leave of absence.

2. Assistant City Manager, Chris Huot, has been performing the duties of the City Manager in addition to his own duties as Assistant City Manager since Mr. Lewis went on leave.

3. The City has determined it would be in the City’s best interests to formally appoint Mr. Huot as Interim City Manager for the duration of the City Manager’s leave of absence to allow him to exercise the authority of the City Manager as necessary.

4. City staff has prepared the attached Interim City Manager Employment Agreement and Resolution Approving the Interim City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Paso Robles and Chris Huot, as required by Government Code Section 36506.

5. The Salary Schedule is proposed to be updated to reflect this action.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Approve Resolution 24-XXX approving the Interim City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Paso Robles and Chris Huot and the amended Master Pay Schedule; or

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis
It is in the best interests of the City to appoint an Interim City Manager to ensure continuity and maintain the efficiency of City operations. Assistant City Manager Chris Huot has been performing the duties of City Manager to satisfaction of the City since Mr. Lewis went on leave, demonstrating that he is competent and qualified to continue performing those duties on an interim basis.

The attached Resolution and Interim City Manager Employment Agreement appoints Chris Huot as Interim City Manager and provides compensation as outlined in the Agreement.

Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact will be the additional compensation paid to Mr. Huot for his services as Interim City Manager as provided in the Interim City Manager Employment Agreement.

Recommendation (Option 2)
Approve Resolution 24-XXX, approving the Interim City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Paso Robles and Chris Huot effective August 12, 2024, the date upon which Mr. Huot began performing the duties of City Manager and amending the Master Pay Schedule.

Attachments

1. Resolution 24-XXX – Interim City Manager Appointment a. Exhibit A – Interim City Manager Employment Agreement – Chris Huot b. Exhibit B – Master Pay Schedule

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 24-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

APPROVING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH

CHRIS HUOT AND ADOPTING THE REVISED SALARY SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, City of Paso Robles (“City”) City Manager Ty Lewis is on an extended leave of absence; and WHEREAS, Chris Huot is currently employed by the City as Assistant City Manager; and WHEREAS, at the City Council has determined that it would be in the City’s best interests and that Mr.

Huot is qualified to serve as Interim City Manager while the City Manager is on leave; and WHEREAS, Mr. Huot shall continue to perform the duties of Assistant City Manager on an as needed basis while performing the duties of Interim City Manager; and WHEREAS, City staff has prepared the attached Interim City Manager Employment Agreement which sets forth the compensation, duties and other terms and conditions which shall apply to Mr. Huot’s services as Interim City Manager; and
WHEREAS, following completion of the interim City Manager assignment, Mr. Huot will return to the position of Assistant City Manager.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASO ROBLES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council approves the Interim City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Paso Robles and Chris Huot, attached hereto as Exhibit A, effective August 2024.

Section 2. The salary rate for the position of Interim City Manager shall be the same as the City Manager, effective August 12, 2024. The City’s Salary Schedule is amended accordingly, and the Salary Schedule is duly approved and adopted by the City Council.

Section 3. The Mayor is authorized to execute the Interim City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Paso Robles and Chris Huot.

APPROVED this 1
st day of October, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

82471.01000\42652123.3
DRAFT 09/24/24
John R. Hamon, Jr.

ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk
Exhibit A: Interim City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Paso Robles and Chris Huot Exhibit B: Master Salary Schedule

Exhibit A

INTERIM CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Employment Agreement (“Agreement”), made by and between the City of Paso Robles, a California municipal corporation (’’City”) and Chris Huot (“Employee”), an individual, both of whom agree as follows:

RECITALS

1. Employee is currently employed as the City’s Assistant City Manager;

2. The current City Manager is on an extended leave of absence of indefinite duration;

3. City is interested in employing Employee, on an interim basis, as the Interim City Manager, and Employee is willing to accept and perform that interim appointment;

4. For the duration of this Agreement, Employee will fill both the role of Assistant City Manager on an as needed basis, or assign the duties to other employees as necessary, and Interim City Manager;

5. Following completion of the interim assignment, Employee will return to the position of Assistant City Manager; and

6. The parties desire to set forth the terms and conditions of the interim assignment; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

Section 1. Appointment; Duties and Authority
City agrees to appoint Employee as Interim City Manager, effective August 12, 2024, to perform the functions and duties specified in the City Manager job description, the City’s Municipal Code, provisions of state law, and the directions of the City Council. Employee is subject to the direction and oversight of the City Council, and is appointed “at will,” meaning that the employee serves in the capacity of Interim City Manager at the pleasure of the City Council. During this time, Employee will continue to perform the duties of Assistant City Manager on an as needed basis or shall assign those duties to other employees as necessary. Subject to the oversight of the City Council, Employee has discretion to structure his time and prioritize tasks to ensure that necessary functions of each position are adequately fulfilled.

Section 2. Hours of Work.

Employee is exempt under applicable wage and hour laws and is expected to engage in those hours of work necessary to fulfill the obligations of the position. Employee must be available to other staff and members of the public during City’s regular hours of business, and generally Employee is expected to be working during such regular hours of business. Employee’s position also requires frequent time worked outside of customary business hours (e.g. to attend City Council meetings or other functions on City’s behalf). As such, Employee’s daily and weekly work schedule will vary in accordance with the work to be performed, and in accordance with specific direction provided by the City Council. City recognizes that Employee may, from time to time, conduct business in a remote setting in compliance with the City’s approved telework policy.

Exhibit A
Section 3. Performance Evaluation
During this interim assignment, Employee is subject to the City Council’s evaluation of performance, at time(s) selected by the City Council.

Section 4. Compensation
A. Salary: Effective August 12, 2024, Employee will receive a gross base salary of $247,033.80.

Effective August 18, 2024, Employee will receive a gross base salary of $256,915.10 annually (which is within the payrate established in the City’s salary schedule for the City Manager position). Employee shall be paid at the same intervals and in the same manner as other management employees, and all wage payments are subject to applicable payroll taxes and withholdings. Salary changes approved for and applied to any other employees of City shall not be applied to Employee in this interim appointment unless the City Council expressly provides that they shall apply. All compensation to which he is entitled for the Interim City Manager assignment is incorporated into the annual salary listed above.

B. Retroactivity: It is recognized that Employee has been acting in the capacity of the Acting City Manager since August 12, 2024. City agrees to retroactively apply salary in section A back to that date and Employee will be paid any previous accrued earnings in one lump sum in the first pay period after the execution of this agreement.

C. Benefits:

Automobile. Employee’s duties require that he have the use of a personal automobile at all times during his employment with the City. In recognition of that fact, Employee shall receive a car allowance of $230.77 each completed pay period. The parties intend for this taxable allowance to be in lieu of reimbursement on an itemized basis for mileage, gas, insurance, maintenance of a vehicle, etc. Employee is not eligible for and shall not be separately reimbursed for mileage driven in his personal vehicle. Employee shall be responsible for maintaining liability, property and comprehensive insurance on his personal vehicle.

With the exception of the Automobile benefit, while serving in the capacity of Interim City Manager, Employee shall continue to receive the same benefits of employment provided to him in connection with his position as Assistant City Manager.

Professional Dues, Associations, and Related Activities: Employer agrees to budget for and to pay for professional dues and subscriptions of the Employee necessary for continuation and full participation in national, regional, state and local associations, and organizations necessary and desirable for the Employee’s continued professional participation, growth, and advancement, and for the good of the Employer.

Employer agrees to budget for and to pay for travel and subsistence expenses of Employee for professional and official travel, meetings, and occasions to adequately continue the professional development of Employee and to pursue necessary official functions for Employer, including but not limited to the ICMA Annual Conference, the League of California Cities, and such other national, regional, state and local governmental groups and committees in which Employee serves as a member.

Employer also agrees to budget for and to pay for travel and subsistence expenses of Employee for short courses, institutes and seminars that are necessary for the Employee’s professional development and for the good of the Employer.

Exhibit A
Section 5. Retirement
A. CalPERS: For the duration of the Interim City Manager assignment, Employee shall remain eligible for participation in CalPERS.

B. Deferred Compensation. Employee is eligible for participation in a deferred compensation plan if otherwise provided by the City.

Section 6. Term and Termination
Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Employee shall remain in the position of Interim City Manager for the duration of the current City Manager’s leave of absence. At the completion of the Interim City Manager assignment, Employee shall return to the position of Assistant City Manager.

Section 7. Termination
A. Termination by City. Employee understands and agrees that, in this interim assignment, Employee works at the will and pleasure of the City Council, and that Employee may be removed from the Interim City Manager position at any time, with or without cause, without any due process rights. Upon any such removal, or at the completion of the assignment, Employee will resume the position of Assistant City Manager. Notice of re-assignment shall be provided to Employee in writing.

B. Termination of Interim Assignment by Employee. Employee may voluntarily terminate this interim assignment at any time by giving not less than fourteen (14) days’ notice. Upon receipt by the City of Employee’s notice to voluntarily terminate pursuant to this provision, the City shall return Employee to the Assistant City Manager position at any date within that 14-day notice period. Employee will be paid for the Interim Assignment for the days it was performed, with the Assistant City Manager salary resuming upon the effective date of return to that position.

C. Termination of Employment by Employee. Employee may voluntarily terminate employment with the City at any time by giving not less than fourteen (14) days’ notice. Upon receipt of voluntary termination, the City may, at its option, relieve Employee of duty effective any date prior to the end of such period, provided that the City pays Employee all salary that would have been earned by the Employee through the balance of the notice period.

D. Return to Former Position. Employee currently holds the position of Assistant City Manager.

City agrees to keep the Assistant City Manager position available during the Term of this Agreement. Should Employee’s service as Interim City Manager be terminated, Employee may (at his discretion) resume his duties as the Assistant City Manager (“Reinstatement Right”) with all the rights and protections of that position.

Section 8. Indemnification
City shall indemnify and defend Employee in accordance with the California Government Claims Act. City’s obligation to defend and indemnify Employee shall extend only to the entry of a final judgment by the trial court and shall not extend to providing defense or indemnity in connection with an appeal of the judgment, except as otherwise specifically required by law. City will determine, in its sole discretion, whether to compromise and settle any such claim or suit against Employee, as well as the amount of any settlement or judgment rendered thereon.

Exhibit A
Section 9. Notices
Notice pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by personal service, by overnight delivery service (e.g.

Federal Express), or by depositing in the custody of the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

Employer: City of Paso Robles
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA 93446
Attn: Mayor John Hamon
Employee: Chris Huot
Mailing address last on file with City
Notice shall be deemed given as of the date of personal service or as of the date of deposit of such written notice in the course of transmission by overnight delivery or by the United States Postal Service.

Section 10. General Provisions
A. Integration. This Agreement sets forth and establishes the entire understanding between City and Employee with respect to the interim appointment. Any prior discussions or representations by or between the parties regarding this appointment are merged into and rendered null and void by this Agreement. The parties by mutual written Agreement may amend any provision of this Agreement during the life of the Agreement. Such amendments shall be incorporated and made a part of this Agreement.

B. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding on City and Employee and shall not be assignable or transferable, in whole or in part, by either party. Any such purported transfer or assignment shall be null and void.

C. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective, and Employee’s employment shall commence on August 12, 2024.

D. Severability. The invalidity or partial invalidity of any portion of this Agreement will not affect the validity of any other provision. In the event that any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall be deemed to be in full force and effect as if they have been executed by both parties subsequent to the expungement or judicial modification of the invalid provision.

E. Statutory Requirements. This Agreement shall be deemed to incorporate by reference the provisions of Sections 53243 et seq. of the Government Code, as it may be amended or renumbered.

F. Attorney's Fees. If any legal action or proceeding is brought to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the court, shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs and attorney's fees, including such fees and costs as may be incurred in enforcing any judgment or order entered in any such action. Nothing in this subsection shall be read to prevent the parties from agreeing to some alternative method of dispute resolution. If such a method is agreed to, any final determination shall include an award of attorney's fees and costs by the presiding officer.

G. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in

Exhibit A
accordance with the laws of the State of California. Employee and City agree that venue for any dispute shall be in San Luis Obispo County, California.

H. Representation by Counsel. The parties acknowledge and agree that they were, or had the opportunity to be, represented individually by legal counsel with respect to the matters that are the subject of this Agreement and that they are fully advised with respect to their respective rights and obligations resulting from signing this Agreement.

I. Waiver. Any failure of a party to insist upon strict compliance with any term, undertaking, or condition of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such term, undertaking, or condition.

To be effective, a waiver must be in writing, signed and dated by the parties.

J. Counterparts. The Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, including via facsimile or electronically-transmitted signature, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one-in-the-same document.

Exhibit A
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written.

EMPLOYER:

CITY OF PASO ROBLES
By: ____________________
Mayor John Hamon
____________________
Date
EMPLOYEE:

By: ________________________
Chris Huot
Interim City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
By: _____________________
Elizabeth Hull, City Attorney
____________________
Date
____________________
Date

City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: October 1, 2024
Effective Date: August 18, 2024
Full-Time Annual Rates
Job Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Group
Administrative Assistant I $46,676.24 $49,521.16 $52,569.40 $55,790.02 $59,227.48 SEIU Maintenance Specialist I $46,676.24 $49,521.16 $52,569.40 $55,790.02 $59,227.48 SEIU Administrative Assistant II $52,569.40 $55,790.02 $59,198.36 $62,852.66 $66,709.24 SEIU Maintenance Specialist II $52,569.40 $55,790.02 $59,198.36 $62,852.66 $66,709.24 SEIU Maintenance Specialist I (W/WW) $53,630.98 $56,902.56 $60,407.88 $64,111.58 $68,065.14 SEIU Administrative Assistant III $59,501.52 $63,156.34 $67,027.22 $71,114.68 $75,505.56 SEIU/MGMT Maintenance Specialist III $59,501.52 $63,156.34 $67,027.22 $71,114.68 $75,505.56 SEIU Technician I $59,501.52 $63,156.34 $67,027.22 $71,114.68 $75,505.56 SEIU Equipment Mechanic I
Technician I (W/WW) $60,671.78 $64,398.62 $68,356.08 $72,529.86 $76,993.54 SEIU Laboratory Technician I
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator I
Water Treatment Operator I
Water Quality Technician I
Maintenance Specialist II (W/WW) $61,603.62 $65,374.40 $69,376.84 $73,662.42 $78,180.18 SEIU Technician II $64,110.02 $68,037.84 $72,212.40 $76,631.88 $81,341.00 SEIU Community Services Officer
Crime Analyst
Engineering Technician II
Equipment Mechanic II
Planning Technician
Police Officer Recruit
Technician II (W/WW) $67,187.90 $71,300.06 $75,664.42 $80,295.80 $85,224.10 SEIU Laboratory Technician II
Water Treatment Operator II
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator II
Water Quality Technician II
Maintenance Specialist III (W/WW) $67,797.60 $71,964.62 $76,389.04 $81,056.04 $86,046.22 SEIU Dispatcher $69,650.10 $73,901.62 $78,415.22 $83,207.80 $88,293.66 POA

Attachment 1, Exhibit B

City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: October 1, 2024
Effective Date: August 18, 2024
Technician III $74,017.84 $78,567.32 $83,363.02 $88,504.00 $93,935.40 SEIU Assistant Planner
Building Inspector
Development Services Technician
Engineering Inspector
Engineering Technician III
Fire Prevention Specialist I
Information Systems Technician III
Supervisor/Professional/Coordinator I $74,017.84 $78,567.32 $83,363.02 $88,504.00 $93,935.40 SEIU/MGMT Administrative Services Coordinator
Adult Services Librarian
Aquatics Coordinator
Civic Engagement Coordinator
Executive Assistant/Deputy City Clerk
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor
Fleet Supervisor
Human Resources Specialist
Landscape Supervisor
Librarian
Outreach Services Librarian
Parking Coordinator
Parks and Trails Supervisor
Payroll/Risk Coordinator
Records Supervisor
Recreation Marketing Coordinator
Senior Accountant
Streets Maintenance Supervisor
Technical Services Librarian
Utility Billing Supervisor
Volunteer Coordinator

Attachment 1, Exhibit B

City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: October 1, 2024
Effective Date: August 18, 2024
Technician III (W/WW) $75,476.96 $80,113.02 $85,023.64 $90,252.24 $95,798.82 SEIU Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator III
Water Treatment Operator III
Water Distribution Chief Operator $75,476.96 $80,113.02 $85,023.64 $90,252.24 $95,798.82 SEIU Firefighter* $77,488.32 $82,293.12 $87,360.00 $92,747.20 $98,454.72 IAFF Technician IV $81,341.00 $86,338.20 $91,639.08 $97,242.86 $103,222.60 SEIU Fire Prevention Specialist II
Information Systems Technician IV
Senior Building Inspector
Senior Engineering Inspector
Senior Water Quality Inspector
City Clerk $82,877.34 $87,976.20 $93,378.22 $99,112.00 $105,207.18 MGMT Technical Supervisor I (W/WW) $82,929.34 $88,028.20 $93,430.22 $99,164.00 $105,259.18 SEIU Wastewater Collections Supervisor
Wastewater Laboratory Supervisor
Water Quality Supervisor
Dispatch Supervisor $83,451.68 $88,553.40 $93,969.72 $99,720.40 $105,823.64 POA Professional Manager I $85,043.66 $90,228.58 $95,789.72 $101,669.10 $107,922.36 MGMT Associate Development Review Engineer
Associate Planner
Development Services Manager
Firefighter/Paramedic* $86,894.08 $92,252.16 $97,959.68 $104,016.64 $110,423.04 IAFF Fire Engineer* $89,514.88 $95,076.80 $100,929.92 $107,132.48 $113,742.72 IAFF Technical Supervisor II (W/WW) $91,595.66 $97,228.56 $103,179.44 $109,549.70 $116,279.54 SEIU Wastewater Chief Plant Operator
Water Distribution Supervisor
Water Chief Plant Operator
Police Officer $92,316.38 $97,923.28 $103,935.52 $110,291.74 $117,054.60 POA Fire Engineer/Paramedic $100,289.28 $106,491.84 $113,072.96 $120,032.64 $127,429.12 IAFF

Attachment 1, Exhibit B

City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: October 1, 2024
Effective Date: August 18, 2024
Professional Manager II $100,888.32 $107,128.32 $113,714.90 $120,719.04 $128,158.16 MGMT Airport Manager
Assistant Capital Projects Engineer
Deputy Building Official
GIS Analyst
Industrial Waste Manager
Maintenance Services Superintendent
Recreation Services Manager
Senior Development Review Engineer
Senior Planner
Solid Waste Manager
Support Services Manager
Stormwater Manager
Water Utility Engineer
Fire Captain* $107,423.68 $114,033.92 $121,080.96 $128,564.80 $136,485.44 IAFF Sergeant $115,068.98 $122,108.22 $129,610.00 $137,588.62 $146,030.04 POA Fire Captain/Paramedic* $121,080.96 $128,564.80 $136,485.44 $144,930.24 $153,870.08 IAFF Professional Manager III $128,778.78 $136,738.42 $145,159.04 $154,084.84 $163,574.06 MGMT Building Official
Capital Projects Engineer
City Engineer
City Librarian
City Planner
Finance Manager
Human Resources/Risk Manager
Information Technology Manager
Public Works Operations Manager
Recycled Water Manager
Utilities Planning and Engineering Manager
Wastewater Manager
Water Resources Manager

Attachment 1, Exhibit B

City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: October 1, 2024
Effective Date: August 18, 2024
Operations Battalion Chief* $142,105.60 $150,841.60 $160,160.00 $170,031.68 $180,485.76 MGMT Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal* $142,100.40 $150,857.98 $160,151.42 $170,009.32 $180,492.52 MGMT Deputy Community Development Director/City Engineer $146,163.94 $155,198.16 $164,755.50 $174,886.40 $185,656.64 MGMT Police Commander $152,046.96 $161,415.02 $171,347.80 $181,890.54 $193,102.00 MGMT Deputy Fire Chief $159,199.30 $169,053.56 $179,518.82 $190,633.04 $202,436.00 MGMT Executive Manager $161,104.32 $171,055.82 $181,584.78 $192,778.04 $204,650.94 MGMT Administrative Services Director
Assistant City Manager
Community Development Director
Community Services Director
Public Works Director
Utilities Director
Safety Executive Manager $177,771.88 $188,745.18 $200,372.90 $212,729.66 $225,814.94 MGMT Fire Chief
Police Chief
City Manager $256,915.10 $256,915.10 Contract
*Totals are based on the average number of hours worked over a 3 year period

Attachment 1, Exhibit B

City of Paso Robles Wage Schedule
Adopted: October 1, 2024
Effective Date: August 18, 2024
Part-Time Hourly Rates
Job Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Group
Staff Aide $16.85 $17.41 $17.97 $18.53 Part-Time
Clerical/Customer Service Aide
Maintenance Aide
Recreation Aide
Aquatics Office Assistant $17.41 $17.97 $18.53 $19.09 Part-Time Staff Assistant I $18.53 $19.09 $19.66 $20.22 Part-Time Library Assistant I
Recreation Leader I
Entry-Level Labor/Maintenance
Lifeguard/Swim Instructor $17.97 $19.09 $20.22 $21.34 Part-Time Staff Assistant II $21.06 $21.62 $22.18 $22.74 Part-Time Journey-Level Labor/Maintenance
Library Assistant II
Police Records Cadet
Recreation Leader II
Staff Assistant III $23.87 $24.43 $24.99 $25.55 Part-Time Advanced-Level Labor/Maintenance
Assistant Police Dispatcher
Community Services Officer
Engineering Intern
Library Assistant III
Planning Intern
Water Conservation Assistant
Assistant Pool Manager $23.03 $24.15 $25.27 $26.40 Part-Time Staff Assistant IV $27.80 $28.64 $29.48 $30.33 Part-Time Level II Police Officer
Library Coordinator
Pool Manager
Recreation Coordinator

Attachment 1, Exhibit B