Agenda — Pittsburg City Council, October 2, 2023 (part 2 of 7)

October 2022
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
SYSTEMS.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No Impact
a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or
storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
   
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry, and multiple dry
years?
   
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
   
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
   
e. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
   
Discussion
a-c. Brief discussions of water, sewer, stormwater, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities that would serve the proposed project are included below.

Water
The proposed project would include construction of new on-site water lines, which would connect to the existing water lines located within Buchanan Road. Water supply for the project site would be provided by the CCWD through the Central Valley Project (CVP).

The CCWD obtains water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and provides treated and raw water to approximately 500,000 people in Contra Costa County. Other water supply sources used within the service area include the San Joaquin River, Mallard Slough, recycled water, and water transfers. Additionally, the City supplements CCWD water supplies with groundwater from two wells, which yield approximately 1,353 to 1,480 acre-feet per year. The City also operates a citywide water treatment plant and associated infrastructure facilities. According to the Pittsburg 2020 UWMP, the City’s water use for 2020 was 9,232 acre-feet per year.

According to the CCWD UWMP, CCWD’s water supplies will meet the City’s demand and will be able to accommodate buildout of the City under normal year, single year, and multiple-dry year demand scenarios.51 Due to the anticipated surplus, the CCWD’s existing supplies would be adequate to meet increased water demand on the project site associated with the proposed project. Therefore, the City would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years.
51 Contra Costa Water District. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan [pg. 7-8]. June 2021. 101
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Initial Study

Page 84 ends

October 2022
Furthermore, the project would comply with Section 18.84.310 of the City’s Municipal Code, which contains the City’s water-efficient landscape standards. Compliance with Section 18.84.310 of the City’s Municipal Code would ensure that landscaping water demand from project operations would be minimized. Furthermore, a reasonable assumption can be made that a portion of the water used by the proposed car wash would be recirculated. As such, the proposed project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new water infrastructure, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects, and sufficient water supplies exist to serve the proposed project.

Sewer Service
Within the City of Pittsburg, sewer service is provided by Delta Diablo. The City maintains and owns the local sewage collection system. The Delta Diablo Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) has the capacity to treat approximately 19.5 million gallons of sewage per day.52
Delta Diablo created a Sewer System Management Plan in 2009, and updated the Management Plan in 2018. The Management Plan accounts for the Delta Diablo service population to reach 269,000 by 2040 and provides a five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) which would include capacity enhancement projects for sewage systems in the County.53
The project would include construction of a new on-site sewer lines which would connect to an existing sanitary sewer main along Buchanan Road. Wastewater would be directed through the City’s existing conveyance infrastructure to the WWTP. Based on the wastewater generation rate from the City of Pittsburg General Plan of 1,000 gallons per day (gpd) per acre for commercial developments, the proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 2,710 gpd (2.71-acre disturbance area X 1,000 gpd/acre = 2,710 gpd) of wastewater flows.
54 The WWTP currently treats approximately 13 MGD of
wastewater.55 The addition of 2,710 gpd of influent to the WWTP would not exceed the permitted capacity of the WWTP of 19.5 MGD. As such, the proposed project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new wastewater treatment infrastructure. Therefore, the wastewater treatment provider which serves the project would have adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.

Stormwater Systems
As discussed in Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this IS/MND, the proposed project would divide the project site into 21 DMAs that would convey stormwater runoff from the project site into two new bioretention facilities prior to ultimate discharge into the City’s stormwater system, which would be centrally located north of the proposed parking lot. The on-site storm drain system would also include a retention pond, which would be located near the bioretention facilities. In addition, approximately 80 percent of the project site would remain as pervious area, or would be developed into landscaped areas 52 Delta Diablo Sanitation District. Transforming Wastewater to Resources. Available at:
https://www.deltadiablo.org/about-us. Accessed March 2022. 53 Delta Diablo Sanitation District. Sewer System Management Plan. October 10, 2018. 54 City of Pittsburg. General Plan Pittsburg 2020: A Vision for the 21st Century [pg. 11-9]. November 16, 2001. 55 Delta Diablo Sanitation District. Transforming Wastewater to Resources. Available at:
https://www.deltadiablo.org/about-us. Accessed March 2022. 102
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Initial Study

Page 85 ends

October 2022
following development of the proposed project, which would further provide opportunities for stormwater capture throughout the site. Therefore, the proposed stormwater control plan would be adequate to capture and treat the on-site runoff generated by the proposed project, and the project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded storm water drainage facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects.

Other Utilities
Electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications utilities would be provided by way of connections to existing infrastructure located within the immediate project vicinity. PG&E would provide electricity and natural gas services to the project site. The proposed project would not require major upgrades to, or extension of, existing infrastructure. Thus, impacts to electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure would be less than significant.

Conclusions
Given that the proposed project would include standard utility improvements, the existing utility infrastructure would meet increased demand associated with the proposed project.

Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. d,e. Solid waste, recyclable materials, and compostable material collection within the City of Pittsburg is provided by Mt. Diablo Resource Recovery. Solid waste from the City is ultimately disposed of at the Keller Canyon Landfill, located at 901 Bailey Road in Pittsburg. Keller Canyon Landfill has a daily permitted throughput, of 3,500 tons per day.

As of 2004, the remaining capacity was 63,408,410 cubic yards. The maximum permitted capacity of the facility is 75,018,280 cubic yards. The landfill is expected to cease operation in the year 2050.56 While the proposed project would generate solid waste, the waste could be accommodated by the existing landfill facilities used by the City. Due to the nature and relatively small scale of the proposed project, substantial amounts of solid waste would not be generated during operations, such that the landfill could not be capable of adequately handling the additional solid waste generated by the proposed project.

In addition, pursuant to the CALGreen Code, at least a 65 percent diversion of construction waste is required for all projects. Because the landfill is not operating at maximum capacity and the project would only create a temporary increase in the amount of waste during construction activities, the proposed project construction would not result in a significant impact related to solid waste.

Therefore, the proposed project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals and would comply with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Thus, a lessthan-significant impact related to solid waste would occur as a result of the proposed project.
56 CalRecycle. SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details. Keller Canyon Landfill (07-AA-0032). Available at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/4407?siteID=228. Accessed July 2022. 103
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Initial Study

Page 86 ends

October 2022
XX. WILDFIRE.

If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No Impact
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?    
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
   
c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
   
d. Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
   
Discussion
a-d. According to the CAL FIRE Fire and Resource Assessment Program, the project site is not located within or near a State Responsibility Area or lands classified as a VHFHSZ.57 In addition, the site is generally surrounded by existing development. The developed nature of the area surrounding the project site precludes the spread of wildfire to the site.

Furthermore, while not located in an area of high wildfire risk, the proposed development on the project site would be required to include adequate fire protection features, such as fire alarms/smoke detectors, as required by State law. Therefore, the proposed project would not be subject to or result in substantial adverse effects related to wildfire, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
57 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. FHSZ Viewer. Available at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/.

Accessed March 2022.
104
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Initial Study

Page 87 ends

March 2022
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
   
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
   
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
   
Discussion
a. As discussed in Section IV, Biological Resources, of this IS/MND, while the potential exists for ECCCHCP/NCCP covered plants and wildlife, as well as other migratory birds protected by the MBTA to occur on-site, compliance with the ECCCHCP/NCCP would ensure that impacts to special-status species would be less-than-significant. The project site is disturbed and does not contain any known historical resources. However, given that unknown cultural resources have the potential to exist on-site, Mitigation Measures V-1 and V-2 would ensure that impacts to cultural resources would be less-than-significant.

Considering the above, the proposed project would not result in impacts associated with the following: 1) degrade the quality of the environment; 2) substantially reduce or impact the habitat of fish or wildlife species; 3) cause fish or wildlife populations to drop below self-sustaining levels; 4) threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; 5) reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; or 6) eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Therefore, with mitigation incorporated, a less-than-significant impact would occur. b. The proposed project in conjunction with other development within the City of Pittsburg could incrementally contribute to cumulative impacts in the project area. However, as demonstrated in this IS/MND, all potential environmental impacts that could occur as a result of project implementation would be reduced to a less-than-significant level through compliance with the mitigation measures included in this IS/MND, as well as applicable General Plan policies, Municipal Code standards, and other applicable local and State regulations.

Therefore, when viewed in conjunction with other closely related past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future projects, development of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to cumulative impacts in the City of Pittsburg, and the project’s incremental contribution to cumulative impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
105
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Initial Study

Page 88 ends

March 2022
c. As described in this IS/MND, the proposed project would comply with all applicable General Plan policies, Municipal Code standards, other applicable local and State regulations, in addition to the mitigation measures included herein. Additionally, as discussed in Section III, Air Quality, Section IX, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Section XIII, Noise, of this IS/MND, the proposed project would not cause substantial effects to human beings, including effects related to exposure to air pollutants, and hazardous materials. Therefore, with mitigation incorporated, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact.
106

APPENDIX A
CALEEMOD, AERMOD, AND HARP 2 RAST MODELING RESULTS
107
LMK Gas Station Project
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot Acreage and square footage adjusted based on the site plan for the proposed project.

Construction Phase - Construction phase timing based on applicant provided AQ Questionnaire.

Demolition -
Grading - Based on AQ Questionnaire.

Vehicle Trips - Based on Traffic Impact Analysis and AQ Questionnaire prepared for the proposed project.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Based on AQ Questionnaire.

Area Mitigation - Compliant with BAAQMD requirements.

Energy Mitigation - Based on AQ Questionnaire
Water Mitigation - Compliant with MWELO.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 22.00 Space 0.73 8,800.00 0
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 8.00 Pump 1.98 10,903.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 64

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied l------------------------------1------------------------------~-------------------------t------------~-------------~---------------I 108

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 220.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 7,171.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 7,171.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,129.40 10,903.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.20 0.73
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.03 1.98
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 322.50 183.57
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 322.50 183.57
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 322.50 183.57
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I . . ---------------------------••y••----------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y••----------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•-------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•--------.------------------------------ 109

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1711 1.3259 1.1690 2.5200e0030.0634 0.0587 0.1221 0.0233 0.0559 0.0792 0.0000 220.3654 220.3654 0.0379 7.6900e003223.6041 2023 0.1514 0.9110 0.9839 1.7600e0035.0100e0030.0415 0.0465 1.3600e0030.0400 0.0413 0.0000 147.7741 147.7741 0.0247 6.1000e004148.5733 Maximum 0.1711 1.3259 1.1690 2.5200e0030.0634 0.0587 0.1221 0.0233 0.0559 0.0792 0.0000 220.3654 220.3654 0.0379 7.6900e003223.6041 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1711 1.3259 1.1690 2.5200e0030.0634 0.0587 0.1221 0.0233 0.0559 0.0792 0.0000 220.3652 220.3652 0.0379 7.6900e003223.6039 2023 0.1514 0.9110 0.9839 1.7600e0035.0100e0030.0415 0.0465 1.3600e0030.0400 0.0413 0.0000 147.7739 147.7739 0.0247 6.1000e004148.5731 Maximum 0.1711 1.3259 1.1690 2.5200e0030.0634 0.0587 0.1221 0.0233 0.0559 0.0792 0.0000 220.3652 220.3652 0.0379 7.6900e003223.6039 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- I I
I
I
I •• I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,- - - - - - - - .,
., I
I
I
I
110
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 0.6660 0.6660
2 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 0.6117 0.6117
3 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 0.5781 0.5781
4 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.5762 0.5762
5 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.1103 0.1103
Highest 0.6660 0.6660

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0490 0.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Energy 1.4000e0041.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0040.0000 12.1277 12.1277 1.7700e0032.4000e00412.2423 Mobile 0.4036 0.2925 2.4690 2.9900e0030.2903 2.8100e0030.2932 0.0776 2.6100e0030.0802 0.0000 281.0481 281.0481 0.0402 0.0233 288.9917 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0265 0.0585 0.0850 2.7400e0037.0000e0050.1729 Total 0.4528 0.2937 2.4703 3.0000e0030.2903 2.9100e0030.2933 0.0776 2.7100e0030.0803 0.0265 293.2348 293.2614 0.0447 0.0236 301.4075 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ' 111

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0490 0.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Energy 1.4000e0041.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0040.0000 11.2025 11.2025 1.6200e0032.2000e00411.3079 Mobile 0.3961 0.2784 2.3546 2.6900e0030.2561 2.6000e0030.2587 0.0684 2.4200e0030.0708 0.0000 252.0242 252.0242 0.0391 0.0222 259.6223 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0265 0.0552 0.0817 2.7300e0037.0000e0050.1696 Total 0.4453 0.2797 2.3559 2.7000e0030.2561 2.7000e0030.2588 0.0684 2.5200e0030.0709 0.0265 263.2824 263.3090 0.0434 0.0225 271.1003 Mitigated Operational

1.64 4.78 4.63 10.00 11.80 7.22 11.75 11.81 7.01 11.65 0.00 10.21 10.21 2.95 4.58 10.06 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I ■ ■ I -------~------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- ■ ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------~------------------------~----------------------+-------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- 112
4 Paving Paving 7/26/2022 8/15/2022 5 15
5 Building Construction Building Construction 8/15/2022 6/16/2023 5 220 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/29/2022 6/30/2023 5 220 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 16,355; Non-Residential Outdoor: 5,452; Striped Parking Area: 528 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10
Acres of Paving: 0.73
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : :
-------•------------------------•-----------------------+------------+------------+--------+--------•------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------J------------------------~----------------------..... ------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- . .

I
. .

I
I
I
I I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I I I
----------------------------~---------------------------1----------------- ~ ------------1--------------~-------------- . . 113

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.1800e0030.0000 1.1800e0031.8000e0040.0000 1.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e0048.3800e0038.3800e0037.8300e0037.8300e0030.0000 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e0030.0000 21.2120 Total 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e0041.1800e0038.3800e0039.5600e0031.8000e0047.8300e0038.0100e0030.0000 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e0030.0000 21.2120 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 11.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 1,418.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 7.00 3.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied :
----------------------------•--------------------------+------------------------------------~-------------- • I I I I • I I I I
----------------------------~--------------------------+-----------------+------------+--------------~-------------- . . • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------~---------------l-----------~---------+---------~-----------l-----------~---------~----------------------1----------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ••••••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I
114

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.0000e0059.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 9.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0043.0000e0051.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 0.3448 0.3448 1.0000e0055.0000e0050.3613 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.6000e0042.6000e0043.1100e0031.0000e0051.0300e0031.0000e0051.0300e0032.7000e0041.0000e0052.8000e0040.0000 0.8262 0.8262 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.8339 Total 3.9000e0041.2100e0033.3100e0031.0000e0051.1200e0032.0000e0051.1300e0033.0000e0042.0000e0053.1000e0040.0000 1.1709 1.1709 4.0000e0057.0000e0051.1952 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.1800e0030.0000 1.1800e0031.8000e0040.0000 1.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e0048.3800e0038.3800e0037.8300e0037.8300e0030.0000 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e0030.0000 21.2119 Total 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e0041.1800e0038.3800e0039.5600e0031.8000e0047.8300e0038.0100e0030.0000 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e0030.0000 21.2119 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.1000e0048.0000e0059.6000e0040.0000 3.2000e0040.0000 3.2000e0048.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0050.0000 0.2542 0.2542 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2566 Total 1.1000e0048.0000e0059.6000e0040.0000 3.2000e0040.0000 3.2000e0048.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0050.0000 0.2542 0.2542 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2566 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 7.9500e0030.0000 7.9500e0038.6000e0040.0000 8.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.8900e0030.0783 0.0503 1.2000e0042.9800e0032.9800e0032.7400e0032.7400e0030.0000 10.7735 10.7735 3.4800e0030.0000 10.8606 Total 6.8900e0030.0783 0.0503 1.2000e0047.9500e0032.9800e0030.0109 8.6000e0042.7400e0033.6000e0030.0000 10.7735 10.7735 3.4800e0030.0000 10.8606 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0354 0.0000 0.0354 0.0171 0.0000 0.0171 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.7000e0030.0849 0.0461 1.0000e0043.7100e0033.7100e0033.4100e0033.4100e0030.0000 9.0514 9.0514 2.9300e0030.0000 9.1245 Total 7.7000e0030.0849 0.0461 1.0000e0040.0354 3.7100e0030.0391 0.0171 3.4100e0030.0205 0.0000 9.0514 9.0514 2.9300e0030.0000 9.1245 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.3100e0030.1221 0.0260 4.5000e0040.0120 1.0900e0030.0131 3.3000e0031.0500e0034.3500e0030.0000 44.4432 44.4432 1.4600e0037.0400e00346.5775 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4000e0041.0000e0041.2000e0030.0000 4.0000e0040.0000 4.0000e0041.1000e0040.0000 1.1000e0040.0000 0.3178 0.3178 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3207 Total 3.4500e0030.1222 0.0272 4.5000e0040.0124 1.0900e0030.0135 3.4100e0031.0500e0034.4600e0030.0000 44.7609 44.7609 1.4700e0037.0500e00346.8982 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0354 0.0000 0.0354 0.0171 0.0000 0.0171 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.7000e0030.0849 0.0461 1.0000e0043.7100e0033.7100e0033.4100e0033.4100e0030.0000 9.0514 9.0514 2.9300e0030.0000 9.1245 Total 7.7000e0030.0849 0.0461 1.0000e0040.0354 3.7100e0030.0391 0.0171 3.4100e0030.0205 0.0000 9.0514 9.0514 2.9300e0030.0000 9.1245 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.0600e0030.0700 0.0877 1.3000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.3700e0033.3700e0030.0000 11.6325 11.6325 3.6900e0030.0000 11.7247 Paving 9.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.0200e0030.0700 0.0877 1.3000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.3700e0033.3700e0030.0000 11.6325 11.6325 3.6900e0030.0000 11.7247 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.1000e0042.2000e0042.6900e0031.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 8.9000e0042.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 0.7150 0.7150 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.7217 Total 3.1000e0042.2000e0042.6900e0031.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 8.9000e0042.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 0.7150 0.7150 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.7217 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.0600e0030.0700 0.0877 1.3000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.3700e0033.3700e0030.0000 11.6325 11.6325 3.6900e0030.0000 11.7247 Paving 9.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.0200e0030.0700 0.0877 1.3000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.3700e0033.3700e0030.0000 11.6325 11.6325 3.6900e0030.0000 11.7247 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0928 0.7302 0.7177 1.2500e0030.0351 0.0351 0.0337 0.0337 0.0000 103.8401 103.8401 0.0200 0.0000 104.3409 Total 0.0928 0.7302 0.7177 1.2500e0030.0351 0.0351 0.0337 0.0337 0.0000 103.8401 103.8401 0.0200 0.0000 104.3409 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.2000e0048.3800e0032.4400e0033.0000e0059.8000e0049.0000e0051.0700e0032.8000e0048.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 3.0893 3.0893 7.0000e0054.6000e0043.2275 Worker 9.6000e0046.9000e0048.3700e0032.0000e0052.7700e0032.0000e0052.7800e0037.4000e0041.0000e0057.5000e0040.0000 2.2243 2.2243 7.0000e0056.0000e0052.2452 Total 1.2800e0039.0700e0030.0108 5.0000e0053.7500e0031.1000e0043.8500e0031.0200e0039.0000e0051.1200e0030.0000 5.3136 5.3136 1.4000e0045.2000e0045.4726 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0928 0.7302 0.7177 1.2500e0030.0351 0.0351 0.0337 0.0337 0.0000 103.8399 103.8399 0.0200 0.0000 104.3408 Total 0.0928 0.7302 0.7177 1.2500e0030.0351 0.0351 0.0337 0.0337 0.0000 103.8399 103.8399 0.0200 0.0000 104.3408 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1028 0.8174 0.8529 1.5000e0030.0368 0.0368 0.0353 0.0353 0.0000 124.6212 124.6212 0.0236 0.0000 125.2104 Total 0.1028 0.8174 0.8529 1.5000e0030.0368 0.0368 0.0353 0.0353 0.0000 124.6212 124.6212 0.0236 0.0000 125.2104 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.9000e0048.0000e0032.5000e0034.0000e0051.1800e0035.0000e0051.2300e0033.4000e0044.0000e0053.9000e0040.0000 3.5531 3.5531 7.0000e0055.3000e0043.7116 Worker 1.0700e0037.4000e0049.3100e0033.0000e0053.3200e0032.0000e0053.3400e0038.8000e0042.0000e0059.0000e0040.0000 2.6011 2.6011 7.0000e0057.0000e0052.6242 Total 1.2600e0038.7400e0030.0118 7.0000e0054.5000e0037.0000e0054.5700e0031.2200e0036.0000e0051.2900e0030.0000 6.1542 6.1542 1.4000e0046.0000e0046.3358 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1028 0.8174 0.8529 1.5000e0030.0368 0.0368 0.0353 0.0353 0.0000 124.6211 124.6211 0.0236 0.0000 125.2103 Total 0.1028 0.8174 0.8529 1.5000e0030.0368 0.0368 0.0353 0.0353 0.0000 124.6211 124.6211 0.0236 0.0000 125.2103 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2000e0049.0000e0051.0800e0030.0000 3.6000e0040.0000 3.6000e0049.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 0.2860 0.2860 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2887 Total 1.2000e0049.0000e0051.0800e0030.0000 3.6000e0040.0000 3.6000e0049.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 0.2860 0.2860 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2887 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0240 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.2000e0030.0634 0.0816 1.3000e0043.6800e0033.6800e0033.6800e0033.6800e0030.0000 11.4896 11.4896 7.5000e0040.0000 11.5083 Total 0.0332 0.0634 0.0816 1.3000e0043.6800e0033.6800e0033.6800e0033.6800e0030.0000 11.4896 11.4896 7.5000e0040.0000 11.5083 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.7000e0041.1000e0041.4400e0030.0000 5.1000e0040.0000 5.2000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.4025 0.4025 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4061 Total 1.7000e0041.1000e0041.4400e0030.0000 5.1000e0040.0000 5.2000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.4025 0.4025 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4061 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0347 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0125 0.0847 0.1177 1.9000e0044.6000e0034.6000e0034.6000e0034.6000e0030.0000 16.5961 16.5961 9.9000e0040.0000 16.6210 Total 0.0471 0.0847 0.1177 1.9000e0044.6000e0034.6000e0034.6000e0034.6000e0030.0000 16.5961 16.5961 9.9000e0040.0000 16.6210 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- I I
I
I
130
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3961 0.2784 2.3546 2.6900e0030.2561 2.6000e0030.2587 0.0684 2.4200e0030.0708 0.0000 252.0242 252.0242 0.0391 0.0222 259.6223 Unmitigated 0.4036 0.2925 2.4690 2.9900e0030.2903 2.8100e0030.2932 0.0776 2.6100e0030.0802 0.0000 281.0481 281.0481 0.0402 0.0233 288.9917

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,468.56 1,468.56 1468.56 787,742 694,788 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,468.56 1,468.56 1,468.56 787,742 694,788
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

9.50 7.30 7.30 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

0.553342 0.058522 0.188738 0.121080 0.023016 0.005623 0.010412 0.007562 0.000987 0.000568 0.026444 0.000834 0.002871 Parking Lot 0.553342 0.058522 0.188738 0.121080 0.023016 0.005623 0.010412 0.007562 0.000987 0.000568 0.026444 0.000834 0.002871 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--------. --.,..-------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------• ., -. -----,--------.--------,--------.-------.... -----. - ., .,
.,
I I
I I
~·····································=--------------~-----------+-----------~------------------------1-------------------------- : I I ■ ■ I I
I I I I I I ■ I I ■ ■ • • I I • I I ■ ••
~ ■ ■ • • • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • • •
. ., • • • • • • • • • • ,. • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • • • ,r • • • • • • • • ·r • • • • • • • • ·r • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I ------------------------•--------•--------4--------4--------4--------4--------4--------4--------4--------4--------4--------4--------4-------- 131

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.8410 9.8410 1.5900e0031.9000e0049.9383 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.7663 10.7663 1.7400e0032.1000e00410.8727 NaturalGas
Mitigated

1.4000e0041.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0040.0000 1.3615 1.3615 3.0000e0052.0000e0051.3696 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

1.4000e0041.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0040.0000 1.3615 1.3615 3.0000e0052.0000e0051.3696

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I

I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -.. -. - -. -.. sr-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------• -.... --~-------,--------,--------,--------,, -.... - - 132

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
MT/yr tons/yr kBTU/yr Land Use
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

1.4000e- 25513
004

1.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0043.0000e- 1.3615 1.3615 0.0000 005

2.0000e0051.3696

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

1.4000e- Total
004

1.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0043.0000e- 1.3615 1.3615 0.0000 005

2.0000e0051.3696
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
MT/yr tons/yr kBTU/yr Land Use
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

1.4000e- 25513
004

1.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0043.0000e- 1.3615 1.3615 0.0000 005

2.0000e0051.3696

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

1.4000e- Total
004

1.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0043.0000e- 1.3615 1.3615 0.0000 005

2.0000e0051.3696
Mitigated
Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM Page 26 of 34 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ,,
,, r ,, r ,,
-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------~-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1--------------~----------- I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
' ,, ' I I I I I I I I I If
1 I I I I I I I I I •t I I I I I I I I I I I I I •t
-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------~-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------•------~----------- I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
133

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
113282 10.4813 1.7000e0032.1000e00410.5849
Parking Lot 3080 0.2850 5.0000e0051.0000e0050.2878
Total 10.7663 1.7500e0032.2000e00410.8727
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
108282 10.0187 1.6200e0032.0000e00410.1177
Parking Lot -1920 -0.1777 0.0000 0.0000 -0.1794
Total 9.8410 1.5900e0032.0000e0049.9383
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied • I • I • I I I I -----------~------•-------1-------1-------•------- L L
L
L
• I • I • I •• I I I -----------~------•-------1-------1-------•------- L L
L
L
134
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0490 0.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Unmitigated 0.0490 0.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-----------~-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· -------r--------,--------,--------,--------r ------- ., .,
.,
.,
135

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

5.8700e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0432 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 3.0000e0050.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Total 0.0491 0.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
136
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

5.8700e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0432 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 3.0000e0050.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Total 0.0491 0.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
137
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0817 2.7300e0037.0000e0050.1696
Unmitigated 0.0850 2.7400e0037.0000e0050.1729

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

0.0836574
/

0.0512739

0.0850 2.7400e0037.0000e0050.1729
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0850 2.7400e0037.0000e0050.1729
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied .,
.,
I I I

I I I I
. -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------r --. ---- .,
.,
• I • I • I •• I I I -----------~--------------1-------1-------•------- ,, ,.
,.
,.
138

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

0.0836574
/

0.0410191

0.0817 2.7300e0037.0000e0050.1696
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0817 2.7300e0037.0000e0050.1696
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied • I • I • I I I I
-----------~--------------1-------1-------•-------
.,
.,
1,
1,
I,
I,

I I I I
-----------.,..------"'T"-------r--------r ------- .,
.,
139

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr tons Land Use

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr tons Land Use

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Fuel Type Load Factor Horse Power Days/Year Hours/Day Number Equipment Type Date: 3/25/2022 12:56 PM Page 33 of 34 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ,,
,, ' ., '
'
' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ,, '
140

11.0 Vegetation

Construction Phase - Construction phase timing based on applicant provided AQ Questionnaire.

Demolition -
Grading - Based on AQ Questionnaire.

Vehicle Trips - Based on Traffic Impact Analysis and AQ Questionnaire prepared for the proposed project.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Based on AQ Questionnaire.

Area Mitigation - Compliant with BAAQMD requirements.

Energy Mitigation - Based on AQ Questionnaire
Water Mitigation - Compliant with MWELO.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 22.00 Space 0.73 8,800.00 0
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 8.00 Pump 1.98 10,903.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 64

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2030
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied l------------------------------1------------------------------~-------------------------t------------~-------------~---------------I 142

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 220.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 10.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 7,171.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 7,171.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,129.40 10,903.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.20 0.73
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.03 1.98
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 322.50 183.57
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 322.50 183.57
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 322.50 183.57
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I . . ---------------------------••y••----------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y••----------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•-------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•--------.------------------------------ 143

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1711 1.3259 1.1690 2.5200e0030.0634 0.0587 0.1221 0.0233 0.0559 0.0792 0.0000 220.3654 220.3654 0.0379 7.6900e003223.6041 2023 0.1514 0.9110 0.9839 1.7600e0035.0100e0030.0415 0.0465 1.3600e0030.0400 0.0413 0.0000 147.7741 147.7741 0.0247 6.1000e004148.5733 Maximum 0.1711 1.3259 1.1690 2.5200e0030.0634 0.0587 0.1221 0.0233 0.0559 0.0792 0.0000 220.3654 220.3654 0.0379 7.6900e003223.6041 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1711 1.3259 1.1690 2.5200e0030.0634 0.0587 0.1221 0.0233 0.0559 0.0792 0.0000 220.3652 220.3652 0.0379 7.6900e003223.6039 2023 0.1514 0.9110 0.9839 1.7600e0035.0100e0030.0415 0.0465 1.3600e0030.0400 0.0413 0.0000 147.7739 147.7739 0.0247 6.1000e004148.5731 Maximum 0.1711 1.3259 1.1690 2.5200e0030.0634 0.0587 0.1221 0.0233 0.0559 0.0792 0.0000 220.3652 220.3652 0.0379 7.6900e003223.6039 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- I I
I
I
I •• I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,- - - - - - - - .,
., I
I
I
I
144
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0490 0.0000 2.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Energy 1.4000e0041.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0040.0000 12.1277 12.1277 1.7700e0032.4000e00412.2423 Mobile 0.3080 0.2292 2.0624 2.5500e0030.2904 2.1500e0030.2926 0.0776 2.0000e0030.0796 0.0000 248.5146 248.5146 0.0297 0.0191 254.9520 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0265 0.0585 0.0850 2.7400e0037.0000e0050.1729 Total 0.3572 0.2304 2.0638 2.5600e0030.2904 2.2500e0030.2927 0.0776 2.1000e0030.0797 0.0265 260.7014 260.7279 0.0342 0.0194 267.3678 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0490 0.0000 2.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Energy 1.4000e0041.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0040.0000 11.2025 11.2025 1.6200e0032.2000e00411.3079 Mobile 0.3014 0.2184 1.9678 2.2800e0030.2561 1.9900e0030.2581 0.0684 1.8500e0030.0703 0.0000 222.8290 222.8290 0.0287 0.0182 228.9710 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0265 0.0552 0.0817 2.7300e0037.0000e0050.1696 Total 0.3506 0.2197 1.9691 2.2900e0030.2561 2.0900e0030.2582 0.0684 1.9500e0030.0704 0.0265 234.0872 234.1138 0.0330 0.0185 240.4491 Mitigated Operational

1.85 4.68 4.59 10.55 11.80 7.11 11.76 11.79 7.14 11.67 0.00 10.21 10.21 3.48 4.79 10.07 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I ■ ■ I -------~------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- ■ ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------~------------------------~----------------------+-------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- 146
4 Paving Paving 7/26/2022 8/15/2022 5 15
5 Building Construction Building Construction 8/15/2022 6/16/2023 5 220 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/29/2022 6/30/2023 5 220 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 16,355; Non-Residential Outdoor: 5,452; Striped Parking Area: 528 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10
Acres of Paving: 0.73
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : :
-------•------------------------•-----------------------+------------+------------+--------+--------•------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------J------------------------~----------------------..... ------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- . .

I
. .

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 11.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 1,418.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 7.00 3.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied :
----------------------------•--------------------------+------------------------------------~-------------- • I I I I • I I I I
----------------------------~--------------------------+-----------------+------------+--------------~-------------- . . • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------~---------------l-----------~---------+---------~-----------l-----------~---------~----------------------1----------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ••••••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I
148

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.0000e0059.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 9.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0043.0000e0051.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 0.3448 0.3448 1.0000e0055.0000e0050.3613 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.6000e0042.6000e0043.1100e0031.0000e0051.0300e0031.0000e0051.0300e0032.7000e0041.0000e0052.8000e0040.0000 0.8262 0.8262 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.8339 Total 3.9000e0041.2100e0033.3100e0031.0000e0051.1200e0032.0000e0051.1300e0033.0000e0042.0000e0053.1000e0040.0000 1.1709 1.1709 4.0000e0057.0000e0051.1952 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.1800e0030.0000 1.1800e0031.8000e0040.0000 1.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e0048.3800e0038.3800e0037.8300e0037.8300e0030.0000 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e0030.0000 21.2119 Total 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e0041.1800e0038.3800e0039.5600e0031.8000e0047.8300e0038.0100e0030.0000 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e0030.0000 21.2119 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.1000e0048.0000e0059.6000e0040.0000 3.2000e0040.0000 3.2000e0048.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0050.0000 0.2542 0.2542 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2566 Total 1.1000e0048.0000e0059.6000e0040.0000 3.2000e0040.0000 3.2000e0048.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0050.0000 0.2542 0.2542 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2566 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 7.9500e0030.0000 7.9500e0038.6000e0040.0000 8.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.8900e0030.0783 0.0503 1.2000e0042.9800e0032.9800e0032.7400e0032.7400e0030.0000 10.7735 10.7735 3.4800e0030.0000 10.8606 Total 6.8900e0030.0783 0.0503 1.2000e0047.9500e0032.9800e0030.0109 8.6000e0042.7400e0033.6000e0030.0000 10.7735 10.7735 3.4800e0030.0000 10.8606 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0354 0.0000 0.0354 0.0171 0.0000 0.0171 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.7000e0030.0849 0.0461 1.0000e0043.7100e0033.7100e0033.4100e0033.4100e0030.0000 9.0514 9.0514 2.9300e0030.0000 9.1245 Total 7.7000e0030.0849 0.0461 1.0000e0040.0354 3.7100e0030.0391 0.0171 3.4100e0030.0205 0.0000 9.0514 9.0514 2.9300e0030.0000 9.1245 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.3100e0030.1221 0.0260 4.5000e0040.0120 1.0900e0030.0131 3.3000e0031.0500e0034.3500e0030.0000 44.4432 44.4432 1.4600e0037.0400e00346.5775 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4000e0041.0000e0041.2000e0030.0000 4.0000e0040.0000 4.0000e0041.1000e0040.0000 1.1000e0040.0000 0.3178 0.3178 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3207 Total 3.4500e0030.1222 0.0272 4.5000e0040.0124 1.0900e0030.0135 3.4100e0031.0500e0034.4600e0030.0000 44.7609 44.7609 1.4700e0037.0500e00346.8982 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0354 0.0000 0.0354 0.0171 0.0000 0.0171 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.7000e0030.0849 0.0461 1.0000e0043.7100e0033.7100e0033.4100e0033.4100e0030.0000 9.0514 9.0514 2.9300e0030.0000 9.1245 Total 7.7000e0030.0849 0.0461 1.0000e0040.0354 3.7100e0030.0391 0.0171 3.4100e0030.0205 0.0000 9.0514 9.0514 2.9300e0030.0000 9.1245 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.0600e0030.0700 0.0877 1.3000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.3700e0033.3700e0030.0000 11.6325 11.6325 3.6900e0030.0000 11.7247 Paving 9.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.0200e0030.0700 0.0877 1.3000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.3700e0033.3700e0030.0000 11.6325 11.6325 3.6900e0030.0000 11.7247 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.1000e0042.2000e0042.6900e0031.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 8.9000e0042.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 0.7150 0.7150 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.7217 Total 3.1000e0042.2000e0042.6900e0031.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 8.9000e0042.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 0.7150 0.7150 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.7217 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.0600e0030.0700 0.0877 1.3000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.3700e0033.3700e0030.0000 11.6325 11.6325 3.6900e0030.0000 11.7247 Paving 9.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.0200e0030.0700 0.0877 1.3000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.3700e0033.3700e0030.0000 11.6325 11.6325 3.6900e0030.0000 11.7247 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0928 0.7302 0.7177 1.2500e0030.0351 0.0351 0.0337 0.0337 0.0000 103.8401 103.8401 0.0200 0.0000 104.3409 Total 0.0928 0.7302 0.7177 1.2500e0030.0351 0.0351 0.0337 0.0337 0.0000 103.8401 103.8401 0.0200 0.0000 104.3409 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.2000e0048.3800e0032.4400e0033.0000e0059.8000e0049.0000e0051.0700e0032.8000e0048.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 3.0893 3.0893 7.0000e0054.6000e0043.2275 Worker 9.6000e0046.9000e0048.3700e0032.0000e0052.7700e0032.0000e0052.7800e0037.4000e0041.0000e0057.5000e0040.0000 2.2243 2.2243 7.0000e0056.0000e0052.2452 Total 1.2800e0039.0700e0030.0108 5.0000e0053.7500e0031.1000e0043.8500e0031.0200e0039.0000e0051.1200e0030.0000 5.3136 5.3136 1.4000e0045.2000e0045.4726 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0928 0.7302 0.7177 1.2500e0030.0351 0.0351 0.0337 0.0337 0.0000 103.8399 103.8399 0.0200 0.0000 104.3408 Total 0.0928 0.7302 0.7177 1.2500e0030.0351 0.0351 0.0337 0.0337 0.0000 103.8399 103.8399 0.0200 0.0000 104.3408 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1028 0.8174 0.8529 1.5000e0030.0368 0.0368 0.0353 0.0353 0.0000 124.6212 124.6212 0.0236 0.0000 125.2104 Total 0.1028 0.8174 0.8529 1.5000e0030.0368 0.0368 0.0353 0.0353 0.0000 124.6212 124.6212 0.0236 0.0000 125.2104 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.9000e0048.0000e0032.5000e0034.0000e0051.1800e0035.0000e0051.2300e0033.4000e0044.0000e0053.9000e0040.0000 3.5531 3.5531 7.0000e0055.3000e0043.7116 Worker 1.0700e0037.4000e0049.3100e0033.0000e0053.3200e0032.0000e0053.3400e0038.8000e0042.0000e0059.0000e0040.0000 2.6011 2.6011 7.0000e0057.0000e0052.6242 Total 1.2600e0038.7400e0030.0118 7.0000e0054.5000e0037.0000e0054.5700e0031.2200e0036.0000e0051.2900e0030.0000 6.1542 6.1542 1.4000e0046.0000e0046.3358 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1028 0.8174 0.8529 1.5000e0030.0368 0.0368 0.0353 0.0353 0.0000 124.6211 124.6211 0.0236 0.0000 125.2103 Total 0.1028 0.8174 0.8529 1.5000e0030.0368 0.0368 0.0353 0.0353 0.0000 124.6211 124.6211 0.0236 0.0000 125.2103 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2000e0049.0000e0051.0800e0030.0000 3.6000e0040.0000 3.6000e0049.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 0.2860 0.2860 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2887 Total 1.2000e0049.0000e0051.0800e0030.0000 3.6000e0040.0000 3.6000e0049.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 0.2860 0.2860 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2887 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0240 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.2000e0030.0634 0.0816 1.3000e0043.6800e0033.6800e0033.6800e0033.6800e0030.0000 11.4896 11.4896 7.5000e0040.0000 11.5083 Total 0.0332 0.0634 0.0816 1.3000e0043.6800e0033.6800e0033.6800e0033.6800e0030.0000 11.4896 11.4896 7.5000e0040.0000 11.5083 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.7000e0041.1000e0041.4400e0030.0000 5.1000e0040.0000 5.2000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.4025 0.4025 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4061 Total 1.7000e0041.1000e0041.4400e0030.0000 5.1000e0040.0000 5.2000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.4025 0.4025 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4061 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0347 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0125 0.0847 0.1177 1.9000e0044.6000e0034.6000e0034.6000e0034.6000e0030.0000 16.5961 16.5961 9.9000e0040.0000 16.6210 Total 0.0471 0.0847 0.1177 1.9000e0044.6000e0034.6000e0034.6000e0034.6000e0030.0000 16.5961 16.5961 9.9000e0040.0000 16.6210 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- I I
I
I
164
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3014 0.2184 1.9678 2.2800e0030.2561 1.9900e0030.2581 0.0684 1.8500e0030.0703 0.0000 222.8290 222.8290 0.0287 0.0182 228.9710 Unmitigated 0.3080 0.2292 2.0624 2.5500e0030.2904 2.1500e0030.2926 0.0776 2.0000e0030.0796 0.0000 248.5146 248.5146 0.0297 0.0191 254.9520

4.2 Trip Summary Information

9.50 7.30 7.30 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

0.555148 0.059467 0.187500 0.120419 0.022094 0.005825 0.011277 0.007430 0.000952 0.000505 0.025870 0.000875 0.002638 Parking Lot 0.555148 0.059467 0.187500 0.120419 0.022094 0.005825 0.011277 0.007430 0.000952 0.000505 0.025870 0.000875 0.002638 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.8410 9.8410 1.5900e0031.9000e0049.9383 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.7663 10.7663 1.7400e0032.1000e00410.8727 NaturalGas
Mitigated

1.4000e0041.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0040.0000 1.3615 1.3615 3.0000e0052.0000e0051.3696 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

1.4000e0041.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0040.0000 1.3615 1.3615 3.0000e0052.0000e0051.3696

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I

1.4000e- 25513
004

1.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0043.0000e- 1.3615 1.3615 0.0000 005

2.0000e0051.3696

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

1.4000e- Total
004

1.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0043.0000e- 1.3615 1.3615 0.0000 005

1.4000e- 25513
004

1.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0043.0000e- 1.3615 1.3615 0.0000 005

2.0000e0051.3696

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

1.4000e- Total
004

1.2500e0031.0500e0031.0000e0051.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0043.0000e- 1.3615 1.3615 0.0000 005

2.0000e0051.3696
Mitigated
Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM Page 26 of 34 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ,,
,, r ,, r ,,
-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------~-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1--------------~----------- I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
' ,, ' I I I I I I I I I If
1 I I I I I I I I I •t I I I I I I I I I I I I I •t
-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------~-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------•------~----------- I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
167

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
113282 10.4813 1.7000e0032.1000e00410.5849
Parking Lot 3080 0.2850 5.0000e0051.0000e0050.2878
Total 10.7663 1.7500e0032.2000e00410.8727
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
108282 10.0187 1.6200e0032.0000e00410.1177
Parking Lot -1920 -0.1777 0.0000 0.0000 -0.1794
Total 9.8410 1.5900e0032.0000e0049.9383
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied • I • I • I I I I -----------~------•-------1-------1-------•------- L L
L
L
• I • I • I •• I I I -----------~------•-------1-------1-------•------- L L
L
L
168
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0490 0.0000 2.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Unmitigated 0.0490 0.0000 2.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

5.8700e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0432 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 3.0000e0050.0000 2.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Total 0.0491 0.0000 2.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
170
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

5.8700e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0432 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 3.0000e0050.0000 2.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Total 0.0491 0.0000 2.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4000e0045.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 5.7000e004 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
171
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0817 2.7300e0037.0000e0050.1696
Unmitigated 0.0850 2.7400e0037.0000e0050.1729

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

0.0836574
/

0.0512739

0.0850 2.7400e0037.0000e0050.1729
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0850 2.7400e0037.0000e0050.1729
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied .,
.,
I I I

I I I I
. -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------r --. ---- .,
.,
• I • I • I •• I I I -----------~--------------1-------1-------•------- ,, ,.
,.
,.
172

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

0.0836574
/

0.0410191

0.0817 2.7300e0037.0000e0050.1696
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0817 2.7300e0037.0000e0050.1696
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 34 Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied • I • I • I I I I
-----------~--------------1-------1-------•-------
.,
.,
1,
1,
I,
I,

I I I I
-----------.,..------"'T"-------r--------r ------- .,
.,
173

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr tons Land Use

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr tons Land Use

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Fuel Type Load Factor Horse Power Days/Year Hours/Day Number Equipment Type Date: 3/25/2022 1:35 PM Page 33 of 34 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ,,
,, ' ., '
'
' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ,, '
174

11.0 Vegetation

Construction Phase - Construction phase timing based on applicant provided AQ Questionnaire.

Demolition -
Grading - Based on AQ Questionnaire.

Vehicle Trips - Based on Traffic Impact Analysis and AQ Questionnaire prepared for the proposed project.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Based on AQ Questionnaire.

Area Mitigation - Compliant with BAAQMD requirements.

Energy Mitigation - Based on AQ Questionnaire
Water Mitigation - Compliant with MWELO.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 22.00 Space 0.73 8,800.00 0
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 8.00 Pump 1.98 10,903.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 64

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied l------------------------------1------------------------------~-------------------------t------------~-------------~---------------I 176

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 220.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 7,171.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 7,171.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,129.40 10,903.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.20 0.73
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.03 1.98
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 322.50 183.57
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 322.50 183.57
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 322.50 183.57
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I . . ---------------------------••y••----------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y••----------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•-------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•--------.------------------------------ 177

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.3495 49.9004 26.7231 0.1303 9.7679 1.4501 11.2180 4.1589 1.3432 5.5022 0.0000 13,688.89 43 13,688.89
43 1.5155 1.5563 14,190.55
61 2023 2.4637 15.0680 16.2579 0.0292 0.0860 0.6856 0.7716 0.0233 0.6599 0.6832 0.0000 2,694.517 3 2,694.517
3 0.4526 0.0110 2,709.119
2 Maximum 3.3495 49.9004 26.7231 0.1303 9.7679 1.4501 11.2180 4.1589 1.3432 5.5022 0.0000 13,688.89 43 13,688.89
43 1.5155 1.5563 14,190.55
61 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.3495 49.9004 26.7231 0.1303 9.7679 1.4501 11.2180 4.1589 1.3432 5.5022 0.0000 13,688.89 43 13,688.89
43 1.5155 1.5563 14,190.55
61 2023 2.4637 15.0680 16.2579 0.0292 0.0860 0.6856 0.7716 0.0233 0.6599 0.6832 0.0000 2,694.517 3 2,694.517
3 0.4526 0.0110 2,709.119
2 Maximum 3.3495 49.9004 26.7231 0.1303 9.7679 1.4501 11.2180 4.1589 1.3432 5.5022 0.0000 13,688.89 43 13,688.89
43 1.5155 1.5563 14,190.55
61 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- I I
I
I
I •• I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,- - - - - - - - .,
., I
I
I
I
178
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
179

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Energy 7.5000e0046.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0048.2234 8.2234 1.6000e0041.5000e0048.2722 Mobile 2.6222 1.4732 12.2178 0.0172 1.6580 0.0155 1.6735 0.4416 0.0144 0.4559 1,782.805 7 1,782.805
7 0.2140 0.1319 1,827.473
7 Total 2.8918 1.4801 12.2266 0.0173 1.6580 0.0160 1.6740 0.4416 0.0149 0.4565 1,791.035 6 1,791.035
6 0.2142 0.1321 1,835.752
9 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Energy 7.5000e0046.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0048.2234 8.2234 1.6000e0041.5000e0048.2722 Mobile 2.5821 1.4021 11.5462 0.0154 1.4624 0.0143 1.4767 0.3895 0.0133 0.4028 1,597.114 3 1,597.114
3 0.2069 0.1258 1,639.767
7 Total 2.8518 1.4089 11.5550 0.0155 1.4624 0.0148 1.4772 0.3895 0.0138 0.4033 1,605.344 2 1,605.344
2 0.2071 0.1259 1,648.047
0 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
I •• I •• I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I •• I •• I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., ., I
I
I
I
180

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 6/1/2022 6/28/2022 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/29/2022 7/12/2022 5 10 3 Grading Grading 7/13/2022 7/26/2022 5 10
4 Paving Paving 7/26/2022 8/15/2022 5 15
5 Building Construction Building Construction 8/15/2022 6/16/2023 5 220 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/29/2022 6/30/2023 5 220 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

1.38 4.81 5.49 10.42 11.80 7.25 11.76 11.80 7.19 11.65 0.00 10.37 10.37 3.29 4.67 10.23 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 16,355; Non-Residential Outdoor: 5,452; Striped Parking Area: 528 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10
Acres of Paving: 0.73
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
■ ■ I
-------J------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------4--------~------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------J------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------4--------~------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------J------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------4--------~------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------J------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------4--------~------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------J------------------------~----------------------..... ------------~------------~--------~--------~-------------------------

I I I I I
I I ····························1---------------------------~--------------- ········-·····~--------+·············· I I I I ····························1---------------------------~---------------- ·············~--------+·············· I I ····························1---------------------------~---------------- ·······-·····~--------+·············· I I I I
-••--•••••••••••••••••••••••~--------------------------..,_ ________________ ~ -----------~-------------r•••••••••••••• 181

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 11.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 1,418.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 7.00 3.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied :
----------------------------•--------------------------+-----------------------~-------------~-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- 1 -------------t---------T-------------- I ----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- 1 -------------~--------T-------------- I ----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- 1 -------------t---------T-------------- I ----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- 1 -------------~--------T-------------- I ----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- 1 -------------t---------T-------------- I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~---------------- ~ -----------~-------------~-------------- . . • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------~---------------l-----------~---------+---------~-----------l-----------~---------~----------------------1----------- 182

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1181 0.0000 0.1181 0.0179 0.0000 0.0179 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.1181 0.8379 0.9560 0.0179 0.7829 0.8008 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.5900e0030.0913 0.0200 3.5000e0049.6200e0038.5000e0040.0105 2.6400e0038.1000e0043.4500e00337.9985 37.9985 1.2500e0036.0200e00339.8233 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0378 0.0228 0.3361 9.6000e0040.1068 5.6000e0040.1074 0.0283 5.1000e0040.0288 97.2482 97.2482 2.6500e0032.4200e00398.0371 Total 0.0404 0.1141 0.3561 1.3100e0030.1164 1.4100e0030.1178 0.0310 1.3200e0030.0323 135.2467 135.2467 3.9000e0038.4400e003137.8604 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
183

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1181 0.0000 0.1181 0.0179 0.0000 0.0179 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 0.0000 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.1181 0.8379 0.9560 0.0179 0.7829 0.8008 0.0000 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.5900e0030.0913 0.0200 3.5000e0049.6200e0038.5000e0040.0105 2.6400e0038.1000e0043.4500e00337.9985 37.9985 1.2500e0036.0200e00339.8233 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0378 0.0228 0.3361 9.6000e0040.1068 5.6000e0040.1074 0.0283 5.1000e0040.0288 97.2482 97.2482 2.6500e0032.4200e00398.0371 Total 0.0404 0.1141 0.3561 1.3100e0030.1164 1.4100e0030.1178 0.0310 1.3200e0030.0323 135.2467 135.2467 3.9000e0038.4400e003137.8604 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
184

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 0.5952 0.5952 0.5476 0.5476 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Total 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 1.5908 0.5952 2.1859 0.1718 0.5476 0.7193 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0233 0.0140 0.2068 5.9000e0040.0657 3.4000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.2000e0040.0178 59.8450 59.8450 1.6300e0031.4900e00360.3305 Total 0.0233 0.0140 0.2068 5.9000e0040.0657 3.4000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.2000e0040.0178 59.8450 59.8450 1.6300e0031.4900e00360.3305 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
185

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 0.5952 0.5952 0.5476 0.5476 0.0000 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Total 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 1.5908 0.5952 2.1859 0.1718 0.5476 0.7193 0.0000 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0233 0.0140 0.2068 5.9000e0040.0657 3.4000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.2000e0040.0178 59.8450 59.8450 1.6300e0031.4900e00360.3305 Total 0.0233 0.0140 0.2068 5.9000e0040.0657 3.4000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.2000e0040.0178 59.8450 59.8450 1.6300e0031.4900e00360.3305 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
186

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.0826 0.7423 7.8249 3.4247 0.6829 4.1076 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.6678 23.5408 5.1597 0.0900 2.4799 0.2189 2.6988 0.6797 0.2094 0.8891 9,796.706 9 9,796.706
9 0.3232 1.5516 10,267.17
08 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0291 0.0175 0.2585 7.4000e0040.0822 4.3000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.0000e0040.0222 74.8063 74.8063 2.0400e0031.8700e00375.4131 Total 0.6969 23.5584 5.4182 0.0907 2.5621 0.2193 2.7814 0.7015 0.2098 0.9113 9,871.513 2 9,871.513
2 0.3252 1.5535 10,342.58
39 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
187

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.0826 0.7423 7.8249 3.4247 0.6829 4.1076 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.6678 23.5408 5.1597 0.0900 2.4799 0.2189 2.6988 0.6797 0.2094 0.8891 9,796.706 9 9,796.706
9 0.3232 1.5516 10,267.17
08 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0291 0.0175 0.2585 7.4000e0040.0822 4.3000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.0000e0040.0222 74.8063 74.8063 2.0400e0031.8700e00375.4131 Total 0.6969 23.5584 5.4182 0.0907 2.5621 0.2193 2.7814 0.7015 0.2098 0.9113 9,871.513 2 9,871.513
2 0.3252 1.5535 10,342.58
39 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
188

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9412 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 1,709.689
2 0.5419 1,723.235
6 Paving 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0687 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 1,709.689
2 0.5419 1,723.235
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0436 0.0263 0.3878 1.1000e0030.1232 6.4000e0040.1239 0.0327 5.9000e0040.0333 112.2095 112.2095 3.0600e0032.8000e003113.1197 Total 0.0436 0.0263 0.3878 1.1000e0030.1232 6.4000e0040.1239 0.0327 5.9000e0040.0333 112.2095 112.2095 3.0600e0032.8000e003113.1197 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
189

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9412 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 0.0000 1,709.689 2 1,709.689
2 0.5419 1,723.235
6 Paving 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0687 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 0.0000 1,709.689 2 1,709.689
2 0.5419 1,723.235
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0436 0.0263 0.3878 1.1000e0030.1232 6.4000e0040.1239 0.0327 5.9000e0040.0333 112.2095 112.2095 3.0600e0032.8000e003113.1197 Total 0.0436 0.0263 0.3878 1.1000e0030.1232 6.4000e0040.1239 0.0327 5.9000e0040.0333 112.2095 112.2095 3.0600e0032.8000e003113.1197 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
190

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Total 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.4700e0030.1618 0.0481 6.4000e0040.0203 1.7200e0030.0220 5.8500e0031.6500e0037.5000e00368.0958 68.0958 1.4800e0030.0101 71.1396 Worker 0.0204 0.0123 0.1810 5.1000e0040.0575 3.0000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.8000e0040.0155 52.3644 52.3644 1.4300e0031.3100e00352.7892 Total 0.0268 0.1741 0.2290 1.1500e0030.0778 2.0200e0030.0798 0.0211 1.9300e0030.0230 120.4602 120.4602 2.9100e0030.0114 123.9288 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I
I
I
191

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 0.0000 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Total 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 0.0000 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.4700e0030.1618 0.0481 6.4000e0040.0203 1.7200e0030.0220 5.8500e0031.6500e0037.5000e00368.0958 68.0958 1.4800e0030.0101 71.1396 Worker 0.0204 0.0123 0.1810 5.1000e0040.0575 3.0000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.8000e0040.0155 52.3644 52.3644 1.4300e0031.3100e00352.7892 Total 0.0268 0.1741 0.2290 1.1500e0030.0778 2.0200e0030.0798 0.0211 1.9300e0030.0230 120.4602 120.4602 2.9100e0030.0114 123.9288 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.2600e0030.1287 0.0411 6.1000e0040.0203 7.8000e0040.0211 5.8500e0037.5000e0046.5900e00365.2383 65.2383 1.3400e0039.6400e00368.1457 Worker 0.0189 0.0109 0.1673 5.0000e0040.0575 2.9000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.6000e0040.0155 51.0192 51.0192 1.2900e0031.2100e00351.4120 Total 0.0222 0.1396 0.2084 1.1100e0030.0778 1.0700e0030.0789 0.0211 1.0100e0030.0221 116.2575 116.2575 2.6300e0030.0109 119.5577 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.2600e0030.1287 0.0411 6.1000e0040.0203 7.8000e0040.0211 5.8500e0037.5000e0046.5900e00365.2383 65.2383 1.3400e0039.6400e00368.1457 Worker 0.0189 0.0109 0.1673 5.0000e0040.0575 2.9000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.6000e0040.0155 51.0192 51.0192 1.2900e0031.2100e00351.4120 Total 0.0222 0.1396 0.2084 1.1100e0030.0778 1.0700e0030.0789 0.0211 1.0100e0030.0221 116.2575 116.2575 2.6300e0030.0109 119.5577 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.5336 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 0.7381 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9100e0031.7500e0030.0259 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0037.4806 7.4806 2.0000e0041.9000e0047.5413 Total 2.9100e0031.7500e0030.0259 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0037.4806 7.4806 2.0000e0041.9000e0047.5413 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
195

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.5336 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 0.7381 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9100e0031.7500e0030.0259 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0037.4806 7.4806 2.0000e0041.9000e0047.5413 Total 2.9100e0031.7500e0030.0259 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0037.4806 7.4806 2.0000e0041.9000e0047.5413 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
196

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.5336 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 0.7252 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.7000e0031.5500e0030.0239 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0037.2885 7.2885 1.8000e0041.7000e0047.3446 Total 2.7000e0031.5500e0030.0239 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0037.2885 7.2885 1.8000e0041.7000e0047.3446 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
197

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.5336 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 0.7252 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.7000e0031.5500e0030.0239 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0037.2885 7.2885 1.8000e0041.7000e0047.3446 Total 2.7000e0031.5500e0030.0239 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0037.2885 7.2885 1.8000e0041.7000e0047.3446 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
198

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.5821 1.4021 11.5462 0.0154 1.4624 0.0143 1.4767 0.3895 0.0133 0.4028 1,597.114 3 1,597.114
3 0.2069 0.1258 1,639.767
7 Unmitigated 2.6222 1.4732 12.2178 0.0172 1.6580 0.0155 1.6735 0.4416 0.0144 0.4559 1,782.805 7 1,782.805
7 0.2140 0.1319 1,827.473
7 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

9.50 7.30 7.30 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-----------•r--------,--------.--------,--------,--------.--------,-------..,..-------,--------.--------• -------r--------.--------,--------.-------.... ------- I I
I I ~--···································•--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------1-------------------------- : I I • • I I
I I I I I I • I I ■ ■ ■
• I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
~ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ • ■ ■ • ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ir • • - • • • - • • • T • - - - • • - - • T • • • • • • • • • - T - • • - - - • • ·r - - • • - - • • ·r • • • • • • • - • • • ~ - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • - • • • • - • • • . •
199

4.4 Fleet Mix
MH SBUS MCY UBUS OBUS HHD MHD LHD2 LHD1 MDV LDT2 LDT1 LDA Land Use Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

0.002871 0.000834 0.026444 0.000568 0.000987 0.007562 0.010412 0.005623 0.023016 0.121080 0.188738 0.058522 0.553342

0.002871 0.000834 0.026444 0.000568 0.000987 0.007562 0.010412 0.005623 0.023016 0.121080 0.188738 0.058522 0.553342 Parking Lot

5.0 Energy Detail
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day Category
NaturalGas
Mitigated

7.5000e0046.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

7.5000e0046.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated
Historical Energy Use: N
Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM Page 25 of 30 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied . .. . .. . .. . .. -------.,_, ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ ..,_ ------,.. _______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ ..,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ ..,. ----------- I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I f I I I I I I I I I ■
' .. ' ..
········r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------•········t················· . .

I I I I I I I I I I I I I
200

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day kBTU/yr Land Use
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

7.5000e- 69.8987
004

6.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

7.5000e- Total
004

6.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day kBTU/yr Land Use
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

7.5000e- 0.0698987
004

6.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

7.5000e- Total
004

6.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722
Mitigated
Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM Page 26 of 30 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ,,
,, r ,, r ,,
-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------~-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1--------------~----------- I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
' ,, ' I I I I I I I I I If
1 I I I I I I I I I •t I I 'I
-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------~-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------•------~----------- I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
201
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Unmitigated 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0322 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.2364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.8000e0043.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Total 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
203
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0322 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.2364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.8000e0043.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Total 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:57 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
204

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

Construction Phase - Construction phase timing based on applicant provided AQ Questionnaire.

Demolition -
Grading - Based on AQ Questionnaire.

Vehicle Trips - Based on Traffic Impact Analysis and AQ Questionnaire prepared for the proposed project.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Based on AQ Questionnaire.

Area Mitigation - Compliant with BAAQMD requirements.

Energy Mitigation - Based on AQ Questionnaire
Water Mitigation - Compliant with MWELO.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 22.00 Space 0.73 8,800.00 0
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 8.00 Pump 1.98 10,903.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 64

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied l------------------------------1------------------------------~-------------------------t------------~-------------~---------------I 206

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 220.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 7,171.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 7,171.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,129.40 10,903.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.20 0.73
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.03 1.98
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 322.50 183.57
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 322.50 183.57
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 322.50 183.57
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I . . ---------------------------••y••----------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y••----------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•-------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------------------------T-----------------------------..------------------------------ . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•--------.------------------------------ 207

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.3359 51.2088 26.7761 0.1302 9.7679 1.4504 11.2183 4.1589 1.3435 5.5025 0.0000 13,678.78 97 13,678.78
97 1.5153 1.5576 14,180.83
49 2023 2.4642 15.0784 16.2512 0.0291 0.0860 0.6856 0.7716 0.0233 0.6599 0.6832 0.0000 2,690.477 6 2,690.477
6 0.4528 0.0113 2,705.153
9 Maximum 3.3359 51.2088 26.7761 0.1302 9.7679 1.4504 11.2183 4.1589 1.3435 5.5025 0.0000 13,678.78 97 13,678.78
97 1.5153 1.5576 14,180.83
49 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.3359 51.2088 26.7761 0.1302 9.7679 1.4504 11.2183 4.1589 1.3435 5.5025 0.0000 13,678.78 97 13,678.78
97 1.5153 1.5576 14,180.83
49 2023 2.4642 15.0784 16.2512 0.0291 0.0860 0.6856 0.7716 0.0233 0.6599 0.6832 0.0000 2,690.477 6 2,690.477
6 0.4528 0.0113 2,705.153
9 Maximum 3.3359 51.2088 26.7761 0.1302 9.7679 1.4504 11.2183 4.1589 1.3435 5.5025 0.0000 13,678.78 97 13,678.78
97 1.5153 1.5576 14,180.83
49 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- I I
I
I
I •• I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,- - - - - - - - .,
., I
I
I
I
208
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
209

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Energy 7.5000e0046.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0048.2234 8.2234 1.6000e0041.5000e0048.2722 Mobile 2.1890 1.7093 15.1021 0.0164 1.6580 0.0155 1.6735 0.4416 0.0144 0.4560 1,697.480 2 1,697.480
2 0.2667 0.1478 1,748.188
1 Total 2.4586 1.7162 15.1110 0.0165 1.6580 0.0160 1.6740 0.4416 0.0149 0.4565 1,705.710 1 1,705.710
1 0.2669 0.1479 1,756.467
3 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Energy 7.5000e0046.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0048.2234 8.2234 1.6000e0041.5000e0048.2722 Mobile 2.1469 1.6279 14.4537 0.0147 1.4624 0.0143 1.4767 0.3895 0.0133 0.4028 1,522.631 8 1,522.631
8 0.2595 0.1411 1,571.177
6 Total 2.4165 1.6348 14.4625 0.0148 1.4624 0.0149 1.4772 0.3895 0.0138 0.4033 1,530.861 7 1,530.861
7 0.2597 0.1413 1,579.456
8 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
I •• I •• I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I •• I •• I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., ., I
I
I
I
210

1.71 4.74 4.29 10.27 11.80 7.18 11.76 11.80 7.24 11.65 0.00 10.25 10.25 2.68 4.50 10.08 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 16,355; Non-Residential Outdoor: 5,452; Striped Parking Area: 528 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10
Acres of Paving: 0.73
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 11.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 1,418.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 7.00 3.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied :
----------------------------•--------------------------+-----------------------~-------------~-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- 1 -------------t---------T-------------- I ----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- 1 -------------~--------T-------------- I ----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- 1 -------------t---------T-------------- I ----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+-------------- ' I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- 1 -------------~--------T-------------- I ----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- 1 -------------t---------T-------------- I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~---------------- ~ -----------~-------------~-------------- . . • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------~---------------l-----------~---------+---------~-----------l-----------~---------~----------------------1----------- 212

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1181 0.0000 0.1181 0.0179 0.0000 0.0179 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.1181 0.8379 0.9560 0.0179 0.7829 0.8008 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.5300e0030.0963 0.0203 3.5000e0049.6200e0038.5000e0040.0105 2.6400e0038.1000e0043.4500e00338.0109 38.0109 1.2500e0036.0200e00339.8363 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0386 0.0282 0.3206 8.9000e0040.1068 5.6000e0040.1074 0.0283 5.1000e0040.0288 90.3377 90.3377 3.0000e0032.7900e00391.2450 Total 0.0412 0.1245 0.3409 1.2400e0030.1164 1.4100e0030.1178 0.0310 1.3200e0030.0323 128.3486 128.3486 4.2500e0038.8100e003131.0812 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
213

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1181 0.0000 0.1181 0.0179 0.0000 0.0179 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 0.0000 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.1181 0.8379 0.9560 0.0179 0.7829 0.8008 0.0000 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.5300e0030.0963 0.0203 3.5000e0049.6200e0038.5000e0040.0105 2.6400e0038.1000e0043.4500e00338.0109 38.0109 1.2500e0036.0200e00339.8363 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0386 0.0282 0.3206 8.9000e0040.1068 5.6000e0040.1074 0.0283 5.1000e0040.0288 90.3377 90.3377 3.0000e0032.7900e00391.2450 Total 0.0412 0.1245 0.3409 1.2400e0030.1164 1.4100e0030.1178 0.0310 1.3200e0030.0323 128.3486 128.3486 4.2500e0038.8100e003131.0812 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
214

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 0.5952 0.5952 0.5476 0.5476 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Total 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 1.5908 0.5952 2.1859 0.1718 0.5476 0.7193 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0238 0.0173 0.1973 5.5000e0040.0657 3.4000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.2000e0040.0178 55.5924 55.5924 1.8500e0031.7200e00356.1508 Total 0.0238 0.0173 0.1973 5.5000e0040.0657 3.4000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.2000e0040.0178 55.5924 55.5924 1.8500e0031.7200e00356.1508 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
215

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 0.5952 0.5952 0.5476 0.5476 0.0000 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Total 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 1.5908 0.5952 2.1859 0.1718 0.5476 0.7193 0.0000 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0238 0.0173 0.1973 5.5000e0040.0657 3.4000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.2000e0040.0178 55.5924 55.5924 1.8500e0031.7200e00356.1508 Total 0.0238 0.0173 0.1973 5.5000e0040.0657 3.4000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.2000e0040.0178 55.5924 55.5924 1.8500e0031.7200e00356.1508 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
216

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.0826 0.7423 7.8249 3.4247 0.6829 4.1076 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.6526 24.8389 5.2426 0.0900 2.4799 0.2192 2.6991 0.6797 0.2097 0.8894 9,799.891 7 9,799.891
7 0.3223 1.5522 10,270.51
12 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0297 0.0217 0.2466 6.8000e0040.0822 4.3000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.0000e0040.0222 69.4905 69.4905 2.3100e0032.1500e00370.1885 Total 0.6823 24.8606 5.4891 0.0907 2.5621 0.2196 2.7817 0.7015 0.2101 0.9116 9,869.382 2 9,869.382
2 0.3246 1.5544 10,340.69
97 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
217

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.0826 0.7423 7.8249 3.4247 0.6829 4.1076 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.6526 24.8389 5.2426 0.0900 2.4799 0.2192 2.6991 0.6797 0.2097 0.8894 9,799.891 7 9,799.891
7 0.3223 1.5522 10,270.51
12 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0297 0.0217 0.2466 6.8000e0040.0822 4.3000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.0000e0040.0222 69.4905 69.4905 2.3100e0032.1500e00370.1885 Total 0.6823 24.8606 5.4891 0.0907 2.5621 0.2196 2.7817 0.7015 0.2101 0.9116 9,869.382 2 9,869.382
2 0.3246 1.5544 10,340.69
97 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
218

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9412 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 1,709.689
2 0.5419 1,723.235
6 Paving 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0687 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 1,709.689
2 0.5419 1,723.235
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0446 0.0325 0.3699 1.0200e0030.1232 6.4000e0040.1239 0.0327 5.9000e0040.0333 104.2358 104.2358 3.4600e0033.2200e003105.2827 Total 0.0446 0.0325 0.3699 1.0200e0030.1232 6.4000e0040.1239 0.0327 5.9000e0040.0333 104.2358 104.2358 3.4600e0033.2200e003105.2827 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
219

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9412 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 0.0000 1,709.689 2 1,709.689
2 0.5419 1,723.235
6 Paving 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0687 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 0.0000 1,709.689 2 1,709.689
2 0.5419 1,723.235
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0446 0.0325 0.3699 1.0200e0030.1232 6.4000e0040.1239 0.0327 5.9000e0040.0333 104.2358 104.2358 3.4600e0033.2200e003105.2827 Total 0.0446 0.0325 0.3699 1.0200e0030.1232 6.4000e0040.1239 0.0327 5.9000e0040.0333 104.2358 104.2358 3.4600e0033.2200e003105.2827 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
220

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Total 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.4000e0030.1707 0.0497 6.4000e0040.0203 1.7300e0030.0221 5.8500e0031.6500e0037.5000e00368.1233 68.1233 1.4800e0030.0101 71.1716 Worker 0.0208 0.0152 0.1726 4.8000e0040.0575 3.0000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.8000e0040.0155 48.6434 48.6434 1.6200e0031.5000e00349.1319 Total 0.0272 0.1858 0.2223 1.1200e0030.0778 2.0300e0030.0799 0.0211 1.9300e0030.0230 116.7667 116.7667 3.1000e0030.0116 120.3035 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 0.0000 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Total 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 0.0000 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.4000e0030.1707 0.0497 6.4000e0040.0203 1.7300e0030.0221 5.8500e0031.6500e0037.5000e00368.1233 68.1233 1.4800e0030.0101 71.1716 Worker 0.0208 0.0152 0.1726 4.8000e0040.0575 3.0000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.8000e0040.0155 48.6434 48.6434 1.6200e0031.5000e00349.1319 Total 0.0272 0.1858 0.2223 1.1200e0030.0778 2.0300e0030.0799 0.0211 1.9300e0030.0230 116.7667 116.7667 3.1000e0030.0116 120.3035 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.1500e0030.1362 0.0425 6.1000e0040.0203 7.8000e0040.0211 5.8500e0037.5000e0046.6000e00365.3316 65.3316 1.3300e0039.6700e00368.2461 Worker 0.0194 0.0134 0.1603 4.6000e0040.0575 2.9000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.6000e0040.0155 47.4028 47.4028 1.4600e0031.3900e00347.8546 Total 0.0226 0.1496 0.2028 1.0700e0030.0778 1.0700e0030.0789 0.0211 1.0100e0030.0221 112.7344 112.7344 2.7900e0030.0111 116.1007 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.1500e0030.1362 0.0425 6.1000e0040.0203 7.8000e0040.0211 5.8500e0037.5000e0046.6000e00365.3316 65.3316 1.3300e0039.6700e00368.2461 Worker 0.0194 0.0134 0.1603 4.6000e0040.0575 2.9000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.6000e0040.0155 47.4028 47.4028 1.4600e0031.3900e00347.8546 Total 0.0226 0.1496 0.2028 1.0700e0030.0778 1.0700e0030.0789 0.0211 1.0100e0030.0221 112.7344 112.7344 2.7900e0030.0111 116.1007 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.5336 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 0.7381 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9700e0032.1700e0030.0247 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0036.9491 6.9491 2.3000e0042.1000e0047.0188 Total 2.9700e0032.1700e0030.0247 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0036.9491 6.9491 2.3000e0042.1000e0047.0188 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
225

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.5336 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 0.7381 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9700e0032.1700e0030.0247 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0036.9491 6.9491 2.3000e0042.1000e0047.0188 Total 2.9700e0032.1700e0030.0247 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0036.9491 6.9491 2.3000e0042.1000e0047.0188 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
226

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.5336 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 0.7252 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.7700e0031.9200e0030.0229 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0036.7718 6.7718 2.1000e0042.0000e0046.8364 Total 2.7700e0031.9200e0030.0229 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0036.7718 6.7718 2.1000e0042.0000e0046.8364 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
227

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.5336 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 0.7252 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.7700e0031.9200e0030.0229 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0036.7718 6.7718 2.1000e0042.0000e0046.8364 Total 2.7700e0031.9200e0030.0229 7.0000e0058.2100e0034.0000e0058.2600e0032.1800e0034.0000e0052.2200e0036.7718 6.7718 2.1000e0042.0000e0046.8364 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - .,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - - I I
I
I
228

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.1469 1.6279 14.4537 0.0147 1.4624 0.0143 1.4767 0.3895 0.0133 0.4028 1,522.631 8 1,522.631
8 0.2595 0.1411 1,571.177
6 Unmitigated 2.1890 1.7093 15.1021 0.0164 1.6580 0.0155 1.6735 0.4416 0.0144 0.4560 1,697.480 2 1,697.480
2 0.2667 0.1478 1,748.188
1 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

9.50 7.30 7.30 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I

4.4 Fleet Mix
MH SBUS MCY UBUS OBUS HHD MHD LHD2 LHD1 MDV LDT2 LDT1 LDA Land Use Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

0.002871 0.000834 0.026444 0.000568 0.000987 0.007562 0.010412 0.005623 0.023016 0.121080 0.188738 0.058522 0.553342

0.002871 0.000834 0.026444 0.000568 0.000987 0.007562 0.010412 0.005623 0.023016 0.121080 0.188738 0.058522 0.553342 Parking Lot

5.0 Energy Detail
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day Category
NaturalGas
Mitigated

7.5000e0046.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

7.5000e0046.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated
Historical Energy Use: N
Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM Page 25 of 30 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied . .. . .. . .. . .. -------.,_, ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ ..,_ ------,.. _______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ ..,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ ..,. ----------- I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I f I I I I I I I I I ■
' .. ' ..
········r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------•········t················· . .

I I I I I I I I I I I I I
230

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day kBTU/yr Land Use
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

7.5000e- 69.8987
004

6.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

7.5000e- Total
004

6.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

7.5000e- 0.0698987
004

6.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 Parking Lot

7.5000e- Total
004

6.8500e0035.7600e0034.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0041.6000e- 8.2234 8.2234 004

1.5000e0048.2722
Mitigated
Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM Page 26 of 30 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ,,
,, r ,, r ,,
-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------~-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1--------------~----------- I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
' ,, ' I I I I I I I I I If
1 I I I I I I I I I •t I I 'I
-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------~-------t-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------•------~----------- I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ■
231
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Unmitigated 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

0.0322 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.2364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.8000e0043.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Total 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
233
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0322 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.2364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.8000e0043.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Total 0.2689 3.0000e0053.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0056.5700e0036.5700e0032.0000e0056.9900e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
234

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 30 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM LMK Gas Station Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 235
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Mitigation Report
Construction Mitigation Summary
Phase ROG NOx CO SO2
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5 Bio- CO2
NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Percent Reduction
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OFFROAD Equipment Mitigation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 11 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
---------------------------~------------------~------r------~------•------,-------~------r------~------T------ '
---------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------•------~------~------~------~------~------ ' ---------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------•------~------~------~------~------~------ ' ---------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------•------~------~------~------~------~------ ' ---------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------•------~------~------~------~------~------ ' ---------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------•------~------~------~------~------~------ 236
Equipment Type Fuel Type Tier Number Mitigated Total Number of Equipment DPF Oxidation Catalyst Air Compressors Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Cement and Mortar Mixers Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Cranes Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Forklifts Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
Generator Sets Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Graders Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
Pavers Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Paving Equipment Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Rollers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00 Scrapers Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel No Change 0 8 No Change 0.00 Welders Diesel No Change 0 3 No Change 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 11 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
I I I I I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ • ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ • ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ ■ ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ ■ ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ • ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ • ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ • ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ • ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ • ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ • ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ • ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~-----------------~--------------------~--------------1----------------------1------------ • ■ I I I ■ ■ I I I
------------------------~------------------=---------------------1---------------1----------------------~----------- 237
Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated tons/yr Unmitigated mt/yr
Air Compressors 2.16600E-002 1.48080E-001 1.99330E-001 3.30000E-004 8.28000E-003 8.28000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.80858E+001 2.80858E+001 1.74000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.81293E+001 Cement and
Mortar Mixers

4.40000E-004 2.76000E-003 2.31000E-003 1.00000E-005 1.10000E-004 1.10000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.43710E-001 3.43710E-001 4.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 3.44600E-001 Concrete/Industria
l Saws

3.58000E-003 2.80100E-002 3.66500E-002 6.00000E-005 1.50000E-003 1.50000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.37656E+000 5.37656E+000 2.90000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.38390E+000 Cranes 3.97300E-002 4.38140E-001 2.04680E-001 6.30000E-004 1.82500E-002 1.67900E-002 0.00000E+000 5.57653E+001 5.57653E+001 1.80400E-002 0.00000E+000 5.62162E+001 Forklifts 2.07100E-002 1.93070E-001 2.21160E-001 2.90000E-004 1.23400E-002 1.13500E-002 0.00000E+000 2.58511E+001 2.58511E+001 8.36000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.60601E+001 Generator Sets 3.48500E-002 3.09350E-001 4.03960E-001 7.20000E-004 1.50400E-002 1.50400E-002 0.00000E+000 6.21728E+001 6.21728E+001 2.83000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.22437E+001 Graders 4.15000E-003 5.25800E-002 1.72200E-002 7.00000E-005 1.67000E-003 1.54000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.81758E+000 5.81758E+000 1.88000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.86462E+000 Pavers 1.55000E-003 1.57400E-002 2.16300E-002 4.00000E-005 7.50000E-004 6.90000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.09752E+000 3.09752E+000 1.00000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.12257E+000 Paving Equipment 1.34000E-003 1.30300E-002 1.90900E-002 3.00000E-005 6.40000E-004 5.80000E-004 0.00000E+000 2.68392E+000 2.68392E+000 8.70000E-004 0.00000E+000 2.70562E+000 Rollers 2.49000E-003 2.58900E-002 2.79100E-002 4.00000E-005 1.49000E-003 1.37000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.45779E+000 3.45779E+000 1.12000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.48574E+000 Rubber Tired
Dozers

1.25600E-002 1.31900E-001 5.37300E-002 1.30000E-004 6.26000E-003 5.76000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.12541E+001 1.12541E+001 3.64000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.13451E+001 Scrapers 4.10000E-003 4.47200E-002 3.18800E-002 8.00000E-005 1.75000E-003 1.61000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.66914E+000 6.66914E+000 2.16000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.72306E+000 Tractors/Loaders/
Backhoes

2.13300E-002 2.16770E-001 2.97630E-001 4.10000E-004 1.13500E-002 1.04500E-002 0.00000E+000 3.63941E+001 3.63941E+001 1.17700E-002 0.00000E+000 3.66884E+001 Welders 8.73100E-002 4.75130E-001 5.56400E-001 8.40000E-004 1.95100E-002 1.95100E-002 0.00000E+000 6.21128E+001 6.21128E+001 7.07000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.22897E+001 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 11 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••,----------~----------,----------~----------~••••••••••,---------- ••••••••••~---------~••••••••••~••••••••••,----------T•••••••••• I I I I I & I I I I I I I I I & I I I I -----------~---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------- ' I I I I I , ----------~---------+---------+---------+---------~---------- ' I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I , I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - ... - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - - - - - ,. - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - - ' I I I I I , ' I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -----------,----------"'T'"----------r----------"'T'"---------"'T'"---------"'T'"--------------------~---------"'T'"---------"'T'"----------r----------~---------- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - -:- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -:- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - -i - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------~---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------~----------~---------+---------+---------+---------{---------- • I I I I I 9 1 I I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 I I I I I 9 1 I I I I -----------~---------"'T'" _________ "'T'" _________ "'T'" _________ "'T'" _________ "'T'" _________ , __________ ~---------"'T'"---------"'T'"---------"'T'"---------~---------- 1 I I I I & I I I I I I I I I & I I I I -----------~---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------- • I I I I I 9 ----------~---------+---------+---------+---------{---------- ' I I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 I I I I I 9 1 I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -• - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - - ■
■
238
Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Mitigated tons/yr Mitigated mt/yr
Air Compressors 2.16600E-002 1.48080E-001 1.99330E-001 3.30000E-004 8.28000E-003 8.28000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.80858E+001 2.80858E+001 1.74000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.81293E+001 Cement and Mortar
Mixers

4.40000E-004 2.76000E-003 2.31000E-003 1.00000E-005 1.10000E-004 1.10000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.43710E-001 3.43710E-001 4.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 3.44600E-001 Concrete/Industrial
Saws

3.58000E-003 2.80100E-002 3.66500E-002 6.00000E-005 1.50000E-003 1.50000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.37656E+000 5.37656E+000 2.90000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.38389E+000 Cranes 3.97300E-002 4.38140E-001 2.04680E-001 6.30000E-004 1.82500E-002 1.67900E-002 0.00000E+000 5.57652E+001 5.57652E+001 1.80400E-002 0.00000E+000 5.62161E+001 Forklifts 2.07100E-002 1.93070E-001 2.21160E-001 2.90000E-004 1.23400E-002 1.13500E-002 0.00000E+000 2.58511E+001 2.58511E+001 8.36000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.60601E+001 Generator Sets 3.48500E-002 3.09350E-001 4.03960E-001 7.20000E-004 1.50400E-002 1.50400E-002 0.00000E+000 6.21728E+001 6.21728E+001 2.83000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.22436E+001 Graders 4.15000E-003 5.25800E-002 1.72200E-002 7.00000E-005 1.67000E-003 1.54000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.81758E+000 5.81758E+000 1.88000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.86462E+000 Pavers 1.55000E-003 1.57400E-002 2.16300E-002 4.00000E-005 7.50000E-004 6.90000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.09752E+000 3.09752E+000 1.00000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.12256E+000 Paving Equipment 1.34000E-003 1.30300E-002 1.90900E-002 3.00000E-005 6.40000E-004 5.80000E-004 0.00000E+000 2.68391E+000 2.68391E+000 8.70000E-004 0.00000E+000 2.70562E+000 Rollers 2.49000E-003 2.58900E-002 2.79100E-002 4.00000E-005 1.49000E-003 1.37000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.45778E+000 3.45778E+000 1.12000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.48574E+000 Rubber Tired Dozers 1.25600E-002 1.31900E-001 5.37300E-002 1.30000E-004 6.26000E-003 5.76000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.12541E+001 1.12541E+001 3.64000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.13451E+001 Scrapers 4.10000E-003 4.47200E-002 3.18800E-002 8.00000E-005 1.75000E-003 1.61000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.66913E+000 6.66913E+000 2.16000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.72306E+000 Tractors/Loaders/Ba
ckhoes

2.13300E-002 2.16770E-001 2.97630E-001 4.10000E-004 1.13500E-002 1.04500E-002 0.00000E+000 3.63941E+001 3.63941E+001 1.17700E-002 0.00000E+000 3.66883E+001 Welders 8.73100E-002 4.75130E-001 5.56400E-001 8.40000E-004 1.95100E-002 1.95100E-002 0.00000E+000 6.21127E+001 6.21127E+001 7.07000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.22896E+001 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 11 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
I I I I I I I I I I I -------------~---------~----------~----------~---------- 1 I I I -------· . I ----------~---------~----------~----------~----------~---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------~---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------- ' I I I I I I ----------~---------+---------+---------+---------~---------- ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,. - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - - - - - ,. - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - - ' I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------~---------"'T'"---------"'T'"---------"'T'"---------"'T'"---------"'T'"--------------------~---------"'T'"---------"'T'"---------"'T'"---------~---------- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---- - ----- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l - --------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---- ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------~---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------~----------~---------+---------+---------+---------{---------- • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • - • • • r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -• - • • • • - • • • • r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - • • • • - • • • 239
Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percent Reduction
Air Compressors 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.06816E-006 1.06816E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.42200E-006 Cement and Mortar
Mixers

0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Concrete/Industrial
Saws

0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.85739E-006 Cranes 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.25526E-006 1.25526E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.24519E-006 Forklifts 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.16049E-006 1.16049E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.15119E-006 Generator Sets 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.12589E-006 1.12589E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.12461E-006 Graders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Pavers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 3.20249E-006 Paving Equipment 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 3.72589E-006 3.72589E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Rollers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 2.89202E-006 2.89202E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.77713E-006 1.77713E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 8.81438E-007 Scrapers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.49944E-006 1.49944E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Tractors/Loaders/Ba
ckhoes

0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.37385E-006 1.37385E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.09026E-006 Welders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.28798E-006 1.28798E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.28432E-006 Fugitive Dust Mitigation
Yes/No Mitigation Measure Mitigation Input Mitigation Input Mitigation Input CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 11 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
- - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - - - - 'I- - - - - - - - - - 'I- - - - - - - - - - 'I- - - - - - - - - - 'I- - - - - - - - - - 'I- - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - - - - 'I- - - - - - - - - - 'I- - - - - - - - - - 'I- - - - - - - - - - "P - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------~---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------- ' I I I I I I ----------~---------+---------+---------+---------{---------- ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -,. - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - - - - -,. - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - - ' I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I ' I I I I I
-------------~---------...... I ---------...... I ---------...... I ---------...... I ---------...... I --------------------~---------...... I ---------...... I ---------...... I ---------~---------- I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l - - - - --- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l ---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - l - --- --- --- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------~---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------~----------~---------+---------+---------+---------{---------- • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -• • • • • • • • • • • r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - -r • • • • • • • • • • 240
No Soil Stabilizer for unpaved
Roads
PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
No Replace Ground Cover of Area
Disturbed
PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
No Water Exposed Area PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Frequency (per day)
No Unpaved Road Mitigation Moisture Content
%
Vehicle Speed
(mph)

0.00 No Clean Paved Road % PM Reduction 0.00
Unmitigated Mitigated Percent Reduction
Phase Source PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5
Architectural Coating Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Architectural Coating Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction Roads 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Demolition Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grading Fugitive Dust 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
Grading Roads 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paving Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paving Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Site Preparation Fugitive Dust 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 11 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
----------~----------------------------1----------------~---------------~---------------~---------------~---------------;--------------- . . ----------~----------------------------:----------------~---------------L----------------~---------------1----------------•--------------- ----------~----------------------------:----------------~---------------r----------------~---------------1----------------•--------------- ----------.------------------➔----------+-----------1-----------+----------+-----------+---------------

I I I I I

I I I I
-------------------------~---------------------• --------------l----------------~-------------------1-------------4------------- i I I I

I I I I I
-------------------------~---------------------• --------------l----------------~-------------------1-------------4------------- ' I I I I I I -------------------------~---------------------• --------------l----------------~-------------------1-------------4------------- ' I I I I I I -------------------------~---------------------• --------------l----------------~-------------------1-------------4------------- ' I I I I I I -------------------------~---------------------• --------------l----------------~-------------------1-------------4------------- i I I I

I I I I I
-------------------------~---------------------• --------------l----------------~-------------------1-------------4------------- ' I I I I I I I I I -------------------------~---------------------~-------------l---------------~----------------1-------------------~------------ ------------- 241
Operational Percent Reduction Summary
Category ROG NOx CO SO2
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5 Bio- CO2
NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Percent Reduction
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hearth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile 1.84 4.80 4.63 10.03 7.47 7.28 0.00 10.33 10.33 2.88 4.55 10.16 Natural Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water Indoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.68 3.90 0.36 0.00 1.94 Water Outdoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Operational Mobile Mitigation
Mitigation
Selected
No
No
No
No
Yes
Category
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
% Reduction

0.00 0.24

0.00 0.00

0.10 Input Value 1

0.31 0.01
Measure Input Value 2 Input Value 3
Increase Diversity
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Destination Accessibility
Improve Walkability Design
Increase Density
Project Setting: Suburban Center
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 11 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
----------------------------------------~------r-----------·-------~------~------•------------------~------~------r------ '
----------------------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------=------~------~------~------~------~------ ' ----------------------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------=------~------~------~------~------~------ ' ----------------------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------=------~------~------~------~------~------ ' ----------------------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------=------~------~------~------~------~------ ' ----------------------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------=------~------~------~------~------~------ ' ----------------------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------=------~------~------~------~------~------ ' ----------------------------------------~------~------~------~------~------~------=------~------~------~------~------~------ I I I
I
I
I
-----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- -----------------1----------------+----------------------- -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- -----------·-----------------------------·---------------------------------------- I
I
-----------------1----------------+--------------.----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+--------------.----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+----------------------- I ________________ J I _______________ _ 242
No
Yes
No
No Neighborhood Enhancements
Neighborhood Enhancements
Neighborhood Enhancements
Land Use
Land Use

0.00 2.00

0.10 0.00
Project Site and
Connecting OffSite
Implement NEV Network
Provide Traffic Calming Measures
Improve Pedestrian Network
Land Use SubTotal
Integrate Below Market Rate Housing
No
No
No
No
No
No
Parking Policy Pricing
Transit Improvements
Transit Improvements
Transit Improvements
Transit Improvements
Parking Policy Pricing
Parking Policy Pricing
Parking Policy Pricing
Neighborhood Enhancements 0.02

0.12 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Limit Parking Supply 0.00
Land Use and Site Enhancement Subtotal
Transit Improvements Subtotal
Increase Transit Frequency
Expand Transit Network
Provide BRT System
Parking Policy Pricing Subtotal
On-street Market Pricing
Unbundle Parking Costs
Neighborhood Enhancements Subtotal
No
No
No
No
No
Commute
Commute
Commute
Commute
Commute

0.00 4.50
Transit Subsidy
Encourage Telecommuting and Alternative
Work Schedules
Workplace Parking Charge
Implement Employee Parking "Cash Out"
Implement Trip Reduction Program
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 11 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
- - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -t----------------r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -l------------------r - - - - - - - - - - - 1 I I I
1 I I I
1 I I I -----------~----------------------------·---------------------------------------- ________________ "T""_______________ ----------- -----------L----------------------------i----------------------------------------· ............... l ________________ -------------------~----------- • I 11 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I -----------~----------------------------i----------------------------------------~----------------~-------------- • I . ------------------+----------- I I ' I -----------~----------------------------1----------------------------------------J-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I I I I ' I -----------~----------------------------1----------------------------------------J-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I I , I I -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.J.----------------+------------➔----------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ' -----------~----------------------------1---------------------------------------- ~
I ----------------4-----------------+------------+----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I I -----------------1----------------+------------+----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I I -----------------1----------------+------------+----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I I
-----------------1----------------+-------------+----------- I , I I -----------:-----------------------------;----------------------------------------+-----------~·---------------- 1 - ■----------------~----------- I I
I

I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1111 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _1, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - 243
No
No
No
No
School Trip
Commute
Commute
Commute
Commute

0.00 0.00

10.00 0.00

0.00 2.00
Implement School Bus Program
Commute Subtotal
Provide Ride Sharing Program
Employee Vanpool/Shuttle
Market Commute Trip Reduction Option

0.12 Total VMT Reduction
Area Mitigation
Measure Implemented
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
% Electric Chainsaw
% Electric Leafblower
% Electric Lawnmower
Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Exterior)
Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Interior)
Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Exterior)
Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Interior)
Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies
No Hearth
Only Natural Gas Hearth
Mitigation Measure Input Value

0.00 0.00

0.00 150.00
100.00
150.00
100.00
Energy Mitigation Measures
Yes Use Low VOC Paint (Parking) 150.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM Page 9 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
'
I- •• , ' ••• ' ~- - - ~-
. - 1--
-- +---~--..;..--~--~--~--..;..--..;..--~---I- ----
' I I I I I I
.. , ... , ... , ... , ... , ... ,
• • ,• • • 1• • • 1• • • 1• • • I
.. i
' '
--~---1---1---1---1---~
'
!
---'
.,
244
Measure Implemented
Yes
No
No
Mitigation Measure
Install High Efficiency Lighting
On-site Renewable
Exceed Title 24
Input Value 1

0.00 10,000.00

0.00 0.00
Input Value 2
Appliance Type Land Use Subtype % Improvement
ClothWasher 30.00
DishWasher 15.00
Fan 50.00
Refrigerator 15.00
Water Mitigation Measures
Measure Implemented
No
No
Yes
Mitigation Measure
Use Reclaimed Water
Use Grey Water
Apply Water Conservation on Strategy
Input Value 1

0.00 0.00

0.00 20.00

0.00 Input Value 2
No
No
No
No
Install low-flow bathroom faucet
Install low-flow Toilet
Install low-flow Shower
Install low-flow Kitchen faucet

32.00 18.00

20.00 20.00
No
No
Turf Reduction
Use Water Efficient Irrigation Systems

0.00 6.10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 11 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
I I
I
I
I
------------------------1-------------------------------------------I---------------~-------------- ' I I I ' ------------------------~------------------------------------------+---------------~-------------- I
------------------------~------------------------
------------------------~------------------------
------------------------~------------------------
I I
I
I
I
-----------------------1-------------------------------------------I---------------~-------------- ' I I I -----------------------1-------------------------------------------I---------------~-------------- ' I I I -----------------------1-------------------------------------------I---------------~-------------- ' I I I -----------------------1-------------------------------------------I---------------~-------------- ' I I I -----------------------1-------------------------------------------I---------------~-------------- ' I I I -----------------------1-------------------------------------------I---------------~-------------- ' I I I -----------------------1-------------------------------------------I---------------~-------------- ' I I I -----------------------1-------------------------------------------I---------------~-------------- ' I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .!. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •- - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 245
Solid Waste Mitigation
Mitigation Measures
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Percent Reduction in Waste Disposed
Input Value
No Water Efficient Landscape 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 11 Date: 3/25/2022 12:58 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied LMK Gas Station Project
,-----------------------r- -----------------------------------------1- -------------r--------------, I
246
HARP2 ‐ HRACalc (dated 19044) 10/12/2020 9:54:22 AM ‐ Output Log GLCs loaded successfully
Pollutants loaded successfully
**********************************

RISK SCENARIO SETTINGS
Receptor Type: Resident
Scenario: All
Calculation Method: HighEnd
**********************************

EXPOSURE DURATION PARAMETERS FOR CANCER
Start Age: ‐0.25
Total Exposure Duration: 30
Exposure Duration Bin Distribution
3rd Trimester Bin: 0.25
0<2 Years Bin: 2
2<9 Years Bin: 0
2<16 Years Bin: 14
16<30 Years Bin: 14
16 to 70 Years Bin: 0
**********************************

PATHWAYS ENABLED
NOTE: Inhalation is always enabled and used for all assessments. The remaining pathways are only used for cancer and noncancer chronic assessments.

Inhalation: True
Soil: False
Dermal: False
Mother's milk: False
Water: False
Fish: False
Homegrown crops: False
Beef: False
Dairy: False
Pig: False
Chicken: False
Egg: False
**********************************

INHALATION
Daily breathing rate: LongTerm24HR
**Worker Adjustment Factors**
247
Worker adjustment factors enabled: NO
**Fraction at time at home**
3rd Trimester to 16 years: OFF
16 years to 70 years: ON
**********************************
TIER 2 SETTINGS
Tier2 adjustments were used in this assessment. Please see the input file for details.

Tier2 ‐ What was changed: ED or start age changed|
Calculating cancer risk
Cancer risk saved to: C:\Users\bshea\Desktop\Baseline GDF\LMK_CancerRisk.csv Calculating chronic risk
Chronic risk saved to: C:\Users\bshea\Desktop\Baseline GDF\LMK_NCChronicRisk.csv Calculating acute risk
Acute risk saved to: C:\Users\bshea\Desktop\Baseline GDF\LMK_NCAcuteRisk.csv HRA ran successfully
248
*HARP ‐ HRACalc v19044 10/12/2020 9:54:22 AM ‐ Cancer Risk ‐ Input File: C:\Users\ INDEX GRP1 GRP2 POLID POLABBREV CONC RISK_SUM
1 Loading 0 71432 Benzene 0.000450563 3.54E‐08
2 Breathing 0 71432 Benzene 0.000134098 1.05E‐08
3 Refueling 0 71432 Benzene 0.002434342 1.91E‐07
4 Spillage 0 71432 Benzene 0.008347952 6.57E‐07
5 Loading 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.002403004 1.64E‐08
6 Breathing 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.000715188 4.89E‐09 7 Refueling 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.01298316 8.88E‐08
8 Spillage 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.01335672 9.14E‐08
9 Loading 0 108883 Toluene 0.01201502 0.00E+00
10 Breathing 0 108883 Toluene 0.00357594 0.00E+00
11 Refueling 0 108883 Toluene 0.06491579 0.00E+00
12 Spillage 0 108883 Toluene 0.06678361 0.00E+00
13 Loading 0 1330207 Xylenes 0.003604507 0.00E+00
14 Breathing 0 1330207 Xylenes 0.001072782 0.00E+00
15 Refueling 0 1330207 Xylenes 0.01947474 0.00E+00
16 Spillage 0 1330207 Xylenes 0.02003508 0.00E+00
249
\bshea\Desktop\Baseline GDF\LMK_HRAInput.hra
SCENARIO DETAILS INH_RISK SOIL_RISK DERMAL_RISK MMILK_RISK 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 3.54E‐08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 1.05E‐08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 1.91E‐07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 6.57E‐07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 1.64E‐08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 4.89E‐09 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 8.88E‐08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 9.14E‐08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 250
WATER_RISK FISH_RISK CROP_RISK BEEF_RISK DAIRY_RISK PIG_RISK CHICKEN_RISK EGG_RISK

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 251
1ST_DRIVER 2ND_DRIVER PASTURE_CONC FISH_CONC WATER_CONC NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
252
*HARP ‐ HRACalc v19044 10/12/2020 9:54:22 AM ‐ Chronic Risk ‐ Input File: C:\Users\bshea\Desktop\Baselin INDEX GRP1 GRP2 POLID POLABBREV CONC SCENARIO
1 Loading 0 71432 Benzene 0.000450563 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 2 Breathing 0 71432 Benzene 0.000134098 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 3 Refueling 0 71432 Benzene 0.002434342 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 4 Spillage 0 71432 Benzene 0.008347952 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 5 Loading 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.002403004 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 6 Breathing 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.000715188 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 7 Refueling 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.01298316 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 8 Spillage 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.01335672 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 9 Loading 0 108883 Toluene 0.01201502 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 10 Breathing 0 108883 Toluene 0.00357594 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 11 Refueling 0 108883 Toluene 0.06491579 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 12 Spillage 0 108883 Toluene 0.06678361 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 13 Loading 0 1330207 Xylenes 0.003604507 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 14 Breathing 0 1330207 Xylenes 0.001072782 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 15 Refueling 0 1330207 Xylenes 0.01947474 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 16 Spillage 0 1330207 Xylenes 0.02003508 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh 253
e GDF\LMK_HRAInput.hra

CV CNS IMMUN KIDNEY GILV REPRO/DEVEL RESP SKIN EYE

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.20E‐06 1.20E‐06 1.20E‐06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3.58E‐07 3.58E‐07 3.58E‐07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.49E‐06 6.49E‐06 6.49E‐06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.68E‐06 6.68E‐06 6.68E‐06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.86E‐05

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8.51E‐06

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.55E‐04

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.59E‐04

0.00E+00 5.15E‐06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5.15E‐06 0.00E+00 5.15E‐06

0.00E+00 1.53E‐06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.53E‐06 0.00E+00 1.53E‐06

0.00E+00 2.78E‐05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.78E‐05 0.00E+00 2.78E‐05

0.00E+00 2.86E‐05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.86E‐05 0.00E+00 2.86E‐05 254
BONE/TEETH ENDO BLOOD ODOR GENERAL DETAILS INH_CONC SOIL_DOSE DERMAL_DOSE

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.50E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 4.51E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.47E‐05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 1.34E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8.11E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 2.43E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.78E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 8.35E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 1.20E‐06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 2.40E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 3.58E‐07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 7.15E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 6.49E‐06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 1.30E‐02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 6.68E‐06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 1.34E‐02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 1.20E‐02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 3.58E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 6.49E‐02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 6.68E‐02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 3.60E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 1.07E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 1.95E‐02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * 2.00E‐02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 255
MMILK_DOSE WATER_DOSE FISH_DOSE CROP_DOSE BEEF_DOSE DAIRY_DOSE PIG_DOSE

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 256
CHICKEN_DOSE EGG_DOSE 1ST_DRIVER 2ND_DRIVER 3RD_DRIVER PASTURE_CONC FISH_CONC

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 INHALATION NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 INHALATION NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
257
WATER_CONC

0.00E+00

0.00E+00
258
*HARP ‐ HRACalc v19044 10/12/2020 9:54:22 AM ‐ Acute Risk ‐ Input File: C:\Users\bshea\Desktop\Baseline GDF\ INDEX GRP1 GRP2 POLID POLABBREV CONC SCENARIO CV CNS
1 Loading 0 71432 Benzene 0.01919451 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2 Breathing 0 71432 Benzene 0.005712883 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3 Refueling 0 71432 Benzene 0.1680244 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4 Spillage 0 71432 Benzene 0.7019553 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5 Loading 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.1023707 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6 Breathing 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.03046871 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 7 Refueling 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.89613 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8 Spillage 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 1.123128 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9 Loading 0 108883 Toluene 0.5118536 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 1.02E‐04 10 Breathing 0 108883 Toluene 0.1523435 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 3.05E‐05 11 Refueling 0 108883 Toluene 4.48065 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 8.96E‐04 12 Spillage 0 108883 Toluene 5.615643 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 1.12E‐03 13 Loading 0 1330207 Xylenes 0.1535561 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 6.98E‐06 14 Breathing 0 1330207 Xylenes 0.04570306 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 2.08E‐06 15 Refueling 0 1330207 Xylenes 1.344195 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 6.11E‐05 16 Spillage 0 1330207 Xylenes 1.684693 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 7.66E‐05 259
\LMK_HRAInput.hra

IMMUN KIDNEY GILV REPRO/DEVEL RESP SKIN EYE BONE/TEETH ENDO

7.11E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 7.11E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

2.12E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.12E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

6.22E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.22E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

2.60E‐02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.60E‐02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.02E‐04 0.00E+00 1.02E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3.05E‐05 0.00E+00 3.05E‐05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8.96E‐04 0.00E+00 8.96E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.12E‐03 0.00E+00 1.12E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.98E‐06 0.00E+00 6.98E‐06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.08E‐06 0.00E+00 2.08E‐06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.11E‐05 0.00E+00 6.11E‐05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 7.66E‐05 0.00E+00 7.66E‐05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 260

BLOOD ODOR GENERAL

7.11E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

2.12E‐04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

6.22E‐03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

2.60E‐02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
261
Gasoline Dispensing Operations VOC Calculator
Applicability
Author or updater Last Update
Facility:ID#:Project #: LMK Gas StationInputs gal/day gal/yr

3.29E+03 1,200,000
1,000 gal /hr 1,000 gal /yr
Gasoline Throughput 1.37E-01 1.20E+03Application Type Type # EVR Phase I and EVR Phase
II Installed Underground Tank
9 Vapor Tank Fillin
g Loss VOC 0.08 0.011506849 1.01E+02 0.27616
Vehicle Refuelin
g VOC 0.42 0.057534247 504 1.38082
Breathin
g Loss VOC 0.03 0.003424658 30 0.08219
Spilla
ge VOC 0.42 0.057534247 504 1.38082
Total VOC 0.95 1.30E-01 1.14E+03 3.12000
References:

Enter the change in gas station throughput in units of
gallons/day and gallons/yr. Select the Phase I and Phase II type using the drop down provided. VOC emissions are calculated by the multiplication of Throughput Rates and Emission Factors.

Use this spreadsheet to calculate VOC emissions from gasoline dispensing operations. Entries required in yellow areas, output in grey areas.

Brie Shea (Raney) August 25, 2020
Formula
Substances
lb VOC/
1,000 gal LB/HR LB/YR
* The emission factors are derived from Appendix A in the 1997 CAPCOA Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program document, Gasoline Service Station Industrywide Risk Asessment Guidelines .

LB/DAY
262
12345 6
7 Phase 1 and
Phase II
Exempt
Aboveground
tank
Non-EVR
Phase I and
Phase II
Exempt
Aboveground
tank
EVR Phase I
and Phase II
Exempt
Aboveground
tank
Non-EVR
Phase I and
Non-EVR
Phase II
Installed
Aboveground
tank
EVR Phase I
and Non-EVR
Phase II
Installed (or
Phase II
Exempt Due to
ORVR)
Aboveground
tank
EVR Phase I
and EVR Phase
II (VR-501 only)
Installed
Aboveground
tank
Phase I and
Phase II
Exempt
Underground
Tank
ProcessTank Filling Loss 8.4 0.42 0.17 0.42 0.17 0.17 8.4Vehicle Refueling 8.4 8.4 8.4 0.42 0.42 0.38 8.4Breathing Loss 2.1 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.84Vapor VOC EF 18.90 8.87 8.62 0.89 0.64 0.60 17.64 Spillage 0.61 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.61Total VOC 19.51 9.29 9.04 1.31 1.06 1.02 18.25 lb VOC/1,000 gal
263
8 9 10 11 12
EVR Phase I and Phase II
Exempt
Underground
Tank
EVR Phase I
and EVR
Phase II
Installed
Underground
Tank
EVR Phase I
and Non-EVR
Phase II
Installed (or
Phase II
Exempt Due
to ORVR/E85)
Underground
Tank
Non-EVR
Phase I and
Phase II
Exempt
Underground
Tank
Non-EVR
Phase I and
Non-EVR
Phase II
Installed
Underground
Tank

0.084 0.084 0.084 0.42 0.42

8.4 0.42 0.42 8.4 0.42

0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

8.51 0.53 0.53 8.85 0.87

0.61 0.42 0.42 0.61 0.42

9.12 0.95 0.95 9.46 1.29
264

APPENDIX B

ARBORIST REPORT
265

TREES, BUGS, DIRT

LANDSCAPE CONSULTING & TRAINING
DRAFT2

ARBORIST REPORT
625 Buchanan Road, Pittsburg CA - LMK Gas Station
October 4, 2022
Prepared For: Raney Planning & Management, Inc.
1501 Sports Drive, Suite A
Sacramento CA 95834
PO Box 311, Orinda CA 94563 [email protected] 266 - email 925.254.7950 – Phone Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY...............................................................3 INTRODUCTION ....................................................3 PURPOSE AND USE................................................3 ASSIGNMENT..........................................................3 LIMITS OF ASSIGNMENT.......................................3 BACKGROUND .......................................................3 LOCATION...............................................................3 OBSERVATIONS......................................................4 SETTING ................................................................4 METHODS.................................................................4 DATA.........................................................................5 RECOMMENDATIONS ...........................................5 APPENDIX A – DATA..........................................…6 APPENDIX B - TREE & PALM REMOVAL .............8
APPENDIX C - TREE & PALM PRESERVATION ...9
APPENDIX D - GLOSSARY....................................10 APPENDIX E – TREE LOCATION MAP ................11
APPENDIX F - DIGITAL IMAGES .........................12 APPENDIX G - CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE…19
@Trees, Bugs, Dirt 2022. All rights reserved. This report, dated Tuesday, October 4, 2022 is for the exclusive and confidential use of Trees, Bugs, Dirt clients and their representatives for this project only, and shall not be reproduced in whole or in part on other occasions without the written permission of Michael Baefsky.

Trees, Bugs, Dirt 2 Landscape Consulting & Training 267 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA

SUMMARY
I located twenty trees & palms on the proposed development site, ten of which are protected trees in the city of Pittsburg. Preservation of three and removal of seventeen trees and palms is recommended. Two of the palms are good candidates for transplanting. Eight different species of trees and palms were identified.

Trunk diameters range from seven to sixty six inches, averaging twenty point eight inches. Health ranges from poor to good, averaging fair. Structure and form range from very poor to good, averaging poor-fair.

For trees and palms to be preserved I recommend addressing basic health and safety by mowing weeds, maintaining 3” of wood chip mulch on all bare soil surfaces, removing lower branches and fronds for fire safety, and providing supplemental irrigation as needed. I recommend protection from construction impacts with early clearance pruning, hand or air spade trenching plus root pruning, and fencing along the outside perimeter of a tree protection zone (tpz) that is not accessed during all stages of construction.

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE AND USE
This report is intended to provide information for the Client and the City of Pittsburg as part of a development process.

ASSIGNMENT
I was hired by Raney Planning & Management(Client), to measure, map, tag, digitally image, inventory & evaluate trees at 1265 Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA, and to provide an Arborist Report that includes a summary of my observations, a tree location map, and other relevant information.

LIMITS OF ASSIGNMENT
•Trees were not evaluated below ground or aerially, nor were invasive or destructive methods used to assess tree health.
•Design recommendations to preserve trees are not part of this assignment. •Evaluation of construction impacts is not possible due to the current stage of development documents •Shrubs, defined as plants of low stature with multiple trunks are not evaluated in this report •Trees and palms less than 6.5 inches in diameter are not evaluated in this report •Trees with sprouting multiple stem diameters that do not include 2” diameter sprouts are not included

BACKGROUND
The City of Pittsburg requested from my Client that an arborist evaluate trees on this site to be removed, and provide a written report. My client noted that all of the trees in the “basin” will be removed.

City of Pittsburg Municipal Code protects all trees equal to or greater than 50 inches in circumference (15.6” diameter).

LOCATION
1265 Buchanan Road, Pittsburg CA; bounded by a Contra Costa Canal right of way, Ventura and Meadows Avenues.OBSERVATIONS
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 3 Landscape Consulting & Training 268 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA

SETTING
The site includes asphalt paved driveways and parking areas around three intersecting existing structures, two utility towers, and an unpaved access road. Buchanan Road, Ventura & Meadows Avenues mark approximate property boundaries, along with a seasonal creek or dry drainage at the bottom of a basin area. Dense dry weed growth covers most of the site outside of the basin. The hillside below the structures is a tangled mixture of discarded debris, weeds, falling trees and shrubs. Groves of shrubs line the hillside next to and below the structures, and also along hillsides above and within the basin. Many of the larger trees and shrubs have been topped, resulting in stump sprouted growth that is weak, failure prone, and with very small sprouts in several cases.

METHODS
On September 28, 2022 I visited the site, identified tree, palm & shrub species, measured and estimated trunk circumferences & diameters at four and a half feet above existing grade, tagged trunks of trees & palms, located trees & palms on Google EarthTM, digitally imaged the trees, and assessed their health, structural quality and form.

Document used:
•LMK Gas Station, 1625 Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA (APN 088-030-021), Project Vicinity Map, undated •City of Pittsburg Municipal Code, Article 19, Tree Preservation & Protection Measurements & Calculations
•Trunk circumferences measured at four and one half feet above existing grade •Trees and palms with trunks smaller than 6.5 inches in diameter were not inventoried, nor were shrubs •Multiple trunks combined and reported as cumulative diameter •Trunk circumferences divided by 3.14 to calculate diameter, rounded off to one significant digit Health Structure & Form Evaluation Standards
+numerical rating; zero (dead), one (very poor), two (poor), three (fair), four (good), five (excellent) + form assessed by rating specimens on their deviance from the norm for the species in this region, visual qualities such as attractiveness, and engineering functions such as screening, shading and creating views +qualitative descriptions and items assessed for health & structure include •rooting zone - bare, mulched, limited space, weeds, competing vegetation, moisture, debris •root crown region (trunk & root junction) - buried, clear, pests, diseases, wet, wounds, cavities •trunk - taper, lack of taper, wounds, lean, growth cracks, stress cracks, pests, diseases, wounds •scaffold (major) branches - taper, distribution branches, strength of branch connections, wounds, pests •smaller branches - distribution, size, amount, strength of connections, pests, diseases •twigs - annual growth, color, size, distribution, dead/live •foliage - color, size, distribution, pests, diseases, leaf fall Trees, Bugs, Dirt 4 Landscape Consulting & Training 269 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA
DATA - See Appendix A for complete data set
NUMBER OF TREES & PALMS - 20 trees & palms evaluated
NUMBER OF TREES PROTECTED IN CITY OF PITTSBURG - 10 including #426, 427, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 440, & 441

SPECIES
8 different species of trees were identified including almond (Prunus dulcis), blue gum eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus), CA fan palm (Washingtonia filifera), Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia), olive (Olea europaea), red willow (Salix laevigata), silk tree (Albizia julibrissin), yellow willow (Salix lasiandra).

SIZES
Trunk diameters range from 7 to 66 inches, averaging 20.8 inches

HEALTH, STRUCTURE, AND FORM
• Health ranges from poor to good, averaging fair
• Structure & form ranges from very poor to good, averaging fair to poor

RECOMMENDATIONS
SEVENTEEN REMOVALS - See Appendix B for more details
• Eight trees located in the basin, or along its edge including #429, 431, 432, 433, 434, 436, 437, & 438 • Nine trees are in poor health, structure, and/or form, and are thus not suitable for preservation, including #427, 426, 430, 435, , 439, 440, 441, 442, 443
THREE TREES & PALMS THAT MAY BE PRESERVED - See Appendix C for more details • Seven trees and palms in fair to good health including #424, 425, 428

PRESERVATION MEASURES

BASIC HEALTH & SAFETY
• prune up to ensure fire safety at least six feet for trees & all dead fronds for palms • prune up as needed to provide vehicle clearance
• ensure that root crown regions (trunk-root junction) is clear of soil and that water will drain away from it by performing root crown excavations where soil is burying trunks
• mow weeds to ground, and sheet mulch with three inches of wood chip mulch on top of corrugated cardboard

PROTECTION OF TREES THAT ARE PRESERVED
• establish tree protection zone (tpz) outside of tree driplines • if work will occur within tree driplines then designate the limits of work with paint on the ground, irrigate & airspade trench along the edge of the limits of work, and prune roots professionally where encountered • install six foot high chain link fencing around tpz, anchored in soil Trees, Bugs, Dirt 5 Landscape Consulting & Training 270 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA

APPENDIX A - DATA
# Locale name Genus
species
circumference diameter
(inches)
health structure form notes Protected
in City of
Pittsburg
424 power
tower,
Ventura
Ave.

CA fan
palm
Washingtonia
filifera

31.4 10.0 good good good NO
425 wall
Buchanan
Dr.

CA fan
palm
Washingtonia
filifera

40.8 13.0 good good good NO
426 fence,
Buchanan
Dr.
silk tree Albizia
julibrissin
11,12.6,12.6
, 12.6, 12.6,

12.6, 15.7,

20.4, 22
42 fair poor poor
stump sprout
YES
427 top of cut
for basin
road
almond Prunus
dulcis

12.6, 22, 22,

25.1, 25.1 34 poor poor poor
multi trunk,
included bark,
wilting
YES
428 fence,
Buchanan
Dr.
silk tree Albizia
julibrissin

35.0 11.1 fair fair fair
trunk leaning
NO
429 basin CA fan
palm
Washingtonia
filifera

44.0 14 good good good NO
430 fence,
Buchanan
Dr.
silk tree Albizia
julibrissin

28.3 9 poor very poor very
poor
stump sprout
NO
431 basin CA fan
palm
Washingto
nia filifera

34.5 11 fair good fair NO
432 basin yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra

3.1, 6.3, 7.9,

12.6 9.5 fair poor poor NO
433 basin red willow Salix
laevigata

28.3, 25.1,

25.1, 15.7 30 good fair good large scaffold broken YES
434 basin,
channel
yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra

7.9,6.3,6.3,6
.3, 3.14 X 8 16.5 good poor fair stump sprout YES
435 above
basin,
cccwd
fence
almond Prunus
dulcis

9.4,12.6,12.
6,12.6,6.3 17 poor poor poor YES
436 basin Chinese
elm
Ulmus
parvifolia

6.6,6.3,6.3,1

2.6,78.5 35 fair fair fair YES
#
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 6 Landscape Consulting & Training 271 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA
437 basin Chinese
elm
Ulmus
parvifolia

69.1 22 fair poor good
measured trunk
at 24”, multiple
trunks at 30”
YES
438 edge of
basin
blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus
207.2
66 fair fair fair multi trunk YES
439 hillside
above
basin
Chinese
elm
Ulmus
parvifolia
22,12.6,6.3
14 fair poor fair
multi trunk
falling, root
crown buried,
leaning trunks
NO
440 hillside
above
basin
almond Prunus
dulcis

15.7,15.7,12
.6,12.6,7.9,7
.9,7.9

23.5 poor poor poor
smothered by
wisteria vine,
stump sprout
YES
441 hillside
above
basin
almond Prunus
dulcis

15.7,15.7,15
.7,12.6,12.6 23 poor poor poor
smothered by
wisteria vine YES
442 hillside
above
basin
olive Olea
europaea

6.3,6.3,3.1 X
8 9 fair poor fair NO
443 hillside
above
basin
olive Olea
europaea

6.3,6.3,3.1
x3 7 fair poor fair NO
Locale name Genus
species
circumference diameter
(inches)
health structure form notes Protected
in City of
Pittsburg
#
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 7 Landscape Consulting & Training 272 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA

APPENDIX B - TREE REMOVAL RECOMMENDATIONS
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 8 Landscape Consulting & Training
# Locale name Genus species diameter
(inches) health structure form notes
426 fence, Buchanan
Dr.
silk tree Albizia
julibrissin 42 fair poor poor stump sprout
427 top of cut for
basin road
almond Prunus
amygdalus 34 poor poor poor
multi trunk, included bark,
wilting
429 basin CA fan palm Washingtonia
filifera 14 good good good
430 fence, Buchanan
Dr.
silk tree Albizia
julibrissin 9 poor very poor very poor
stump sprout
431 basin CA fan palm Washingtonia
filifera 11 fair good fair
432 basin yellow
willow
Salix lasiandra 9.5 fair poor poor
433 basin red willow Salix laevigata 30 good fair good large scaffold broken 434 basin, channel yellow
willow
Salix lasiandra 16.5 good poor fair stump sprout
435 above basin,
cccwd fence
almond Prunus
amygdalus 17 poor poor poor
436 basin Chinese elm Ulmus parvifolia 35 fair fair fair 437 basin Chinese elm Ulmus parvifolia 22 fair poor good measured trunk at 24”, multiple trunks at 30”
438 edge of basin blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus 66 fair fair fair multi trunk
439 hillside above
basin
Chinese elm Ulmus parvifolia 14 fair poor fair multi trunk falling, root crown buried, leaning trunks
440 hillside above
basin
almond Prunus
amygdalus 23.5 poor poor poor smothered by wisteria vine, stump sprout 441 hillside above
basin
almond Prunus
amygdalus 23 poor poor poor smothered by wisteria vine
442 hillside above
basin
olive Olea europaea 9 fair poor fair
443 hillside above
basin
olive Olea europaea 7 fair poor fair
273
Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA

APPENDIX C - TREE PRESERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 9 Landscape Consulting & Training
# Locale name Genus
species
diameter
(inches) health structure form notes
424 power tower,
Ventura Ave.

CA fan
palm
Washingtonia
filifera 10.0 good good good good candidate for transplanting 425 wall Buchanan
Dr.

CA fan
palm
Washingtonia
filifera 13.0 good good good good candidate for transplanting 428 fence,
Buchanan Dr.
silk tree Albizia
julibrissin 11.1 fair fair fair trunk leaning
274
Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA

APPENDIX D - GLOSSARY
dripline - region underneath tree canopy
form - genetically determined appearance that includes spread, height & configuration health - tree growth as expressed by foliage, twigs, branches & trunks including resistance to pests root crown – region where trunk and root system meet, also called `buttress’ or `butt’ rooting zone – area where roots are likely to survive, beginning at the trunk and extending up to three times the radius of a tree’s dripline region
scaffold – large, structural branch
structure - physical and mechanical qualities of tree
trunk circumference – measurement of trunk, distance around trunk diameter - trunk circumference divided by 3.14
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 10 Landscape Consulting & Training 275 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA
APPENDIX E - TREE LOCATION MAP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>NORTH>>>>>>>>> Trees, Bugs, Dirt 11 Landscape Consulting & Training 276 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA

APPENDIX F - DIGITAL IMAGES
#424 CA fan palm #425 CA fan palm
#426 silk tree
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 12 Landscape Consulting & Training 277 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA
#427 almond
#428 silk tree #429 CA fan palm
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 13 Landscape Consulting & Training 278 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA
#430 silk tree
#431 fan palm #432 yellow willow
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 14 Landscape Consulting & Training 279 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA
#433 red willow
#434 yellow willow
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 15 Landscape Consulting & Training 280 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA
#435 almond #436 Chinese elm
#437 Chinese elm
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 16 Landscape Consulting & Training 281 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA
#438 blue gum eucalyptus
#439 Chinese elm
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 17 Landscape Consulting & Training 282 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA
#440 almond #441 almond
#442 olive #443 olive
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 18 Landscape Consulting & Training 283 Raney Planning & Management, Inc. DRAFT2 Arborist Report - LMK Gas Station October 4, 2022 Sacramento CA 1625 Buchanan Rd., Pittsburg CA

APPENDIX G - CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE
I, Michael Baefsky certify:
• That I have evaluated the subject trees and palms, and stated my findings accurately. The extent of the evaluation is stated in the attached report;
• That I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; • That the analysis, opinions, and conclusions stated herein are my own; • That my analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted professional practices;
• That no one provided significant professional assistance to the consultant, except as indicated within the report;
• That my compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party.

I certify that I am Registered Consulting Arborist #456, a member of the American Society of Consulting Arborists, and am Certified Arborist & Qualified Risk Assessor #WE0222A, Agricultural Pest Control Advisor #074617, Qualified Applicator #99864, Licensed Landscape Contractor (inactive) #931410, and have been involved in the practice of Arboriculture, Integrated Pest Management, Plant Health Care and Ecological Soils Management, and the study of soils and horticulture for over thirty years.

Trees, Bugs, Dirt 19 Landscape Consulting & Training 284

APPENDIX C

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION
285
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INvESTIGATION

PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE, GAS STATION

AND CAR WASH
1625 S. BUCHANAN

PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA
PROJECT NO. 042-17005
JUNE 5, 2017
Prepared for:

MR.SHASHISHARMA
LMK PETRO, INC.
82 N. MAIN STREET
MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA 95035
Prepared by:

KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DIVISION
1061 SERPENTINE LANE, SUITE F

PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA
(925) 307-1160
286
E~1<raza11& ASSOCIATES. I NC . GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING• ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION
June 5, 2017
Mr. ShashiSharma
LMK Petro, Inc.
82 N. Main Street
Milpitas, California 95035
RE: Geotechnical Engineering Investigation
KA Project. No. 042-17005
Proposed Convenience Store, Gas Station & Car Wash
1625 S. Buchanan Road
Pittsburg, California
Dear Mr. Shanna:

In accordance with your request, we have completed a Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for the above-referenced site. The results of our investigation are presented in the attached report.

If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (925) 307-1160.

DRJ:ht
Respectfully submitted,
KRAZAN & Assoc-1.-.A...,,,E~s-,, Jr,-:N"""c-:--
David R. Jarosz, II
Managing Engineer
RGE No. 2698/RC No. 60185
With Offices Serving The Western United States
1061 Serpentine Lane, Suite F • Pleasanton, CA 94566 • (925) 307-1160 • Fax: (925) 307-1 161 04217005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 287
~~l<razari& ASSOCIATES, I NC.

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING• ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE .......................................................................................................................... 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2 SITE LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 2 GEOLOGIC SETTING ........................................................................................................................... 2 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS ............................................................................. 4 SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ........................................................................ 4 GROUNDWATER .................................................................................................................................... 5 soa LIQUEFACTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 6 Achninistrative Summary ........................................................................................................................ 6 Groundwater Influence on Structures/Construction ............................................................................... 8 Site Preparation ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Slope Construction/Reconstruction ...................................................................................................... 10 Engineered Fill ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Drainage and Landscaping .................................................................................................................... 12 Utility Trench Backfill .......................................................................................................................... 13 Foundations - Conventional .................................................................................................................. 13 Foundations - Drilled Caissons ............................................................................................................. 14 Floor Slabs and Exterior Flatwork ........................................................................................................ 14 Lateral Earth Pressures and Retaining Walls ........................................................................................ 15 R-Value Test Results and Pavement Design ......................................................................................... 16 Seismic Parameters - 2016 CBC .......................................................................................................... 1 7 Soil Cement Reactivity ......................................................................................................................... 18 Compacted Material Acceptance .......................................................................................................... 18 Testing and Inspection .......................................................................................................................... 18 Lll\,fITATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 19 S11"E PLAN ............................................................................................................................................. 21 LOGS OF BORINGS (1 TO 5) .............................................................................................. Appendix A GENERAL EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................... Appendix B GENERAL PAVEMENT SPECIFICATIONS .................................................................... Appendix C With Offices Serving The Western United States
1061 Serpentine Lane, Suite F • Pleasanton, CA 94566 • (925) 307-1160 • Fax: (925) 307-1161 288 04217005 Report (Convenience Store).doc
~~l<razari& Assoc1Ans. 1Nc.

June 5, 2017
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING• ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION
KA Project No. 042-17005

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION

PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE, GAS STATION & CARWASH
1625 S. BUCHANAN ROAD

PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA

INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for the proposed Convenience Store, Gas Station and Car Wash to be located at 1625 S. Buchanan Road in Pittsburg, California. Discussions regarding site conditions are presented herein, together with conclusions and recommendations pertaining to site preparation, Engineered Fill, utility trench backfill, drainage and landscaping, foundations, concrete floor slabs and exterior flatwork, retaining walls, soil cement reactivity and pavement design.

A site plan showing the approximate boring locations is presented following the text of this report. A description of the field investigation, boring logs, and the boring log legend are presented in Appendix A. Appendix A contains a description of the laboratory testing phase of this study, along with the laboratory test results. Appendices B and C contain guides to earthwork and pavement specifications.

When conflicts in the text of the report occur with the general specifications in the appendices, the recommendations in the text of the report have precedence.

PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This investigation was conducted to evaluate the soil and groundwater conditions at the site, to make geotechnical engineering recommendations for use in design of specific construction elements, and to provide criteria for site preparation and Engineered Fill construction.

Our scope of services was outlined in our proposal dated March 20, 2017 (KA Proposal No. P252-17) and included the following:
• A site reconnaissance by a member of our engineering staff to evaluate the surface conditions at the project site.
• A field investigation consisting of drilling 5 borings to depths ranging from approximately 10 to 50 feet for evaluation of the subsurface conditions at the project site. • Performing laboratory tests on representative soil samples obtained from the borings to evaluate the physical and index properties of the subsurface soils.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
1061 Serpentine Lane, Suite F • Pleasanton, CA 94566 • (925) 307-1160 • Fax: (925) 307-11 61 042 I 7005 Repon (Convenience Store).doc
289
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 2
• Evaluation of the data obtained from the investigation and an engineering analysis to provide recommendations for use in the project design and preparation of construction specifications. • Preparation of this report summarizing the results, conclusions, recommendations, and findings of our investigation.

PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We understand that design of the proposed development is currently underway; structural load information and other final details pertaining to the structures are unavailable. On a preliminary basis, it is understood that development will include the construction of an approximately 5,372 square foot store, a 2,800 square foot car wash and a 6,240 square foot gas canopy. It is anticipated the buildings will be single-story structures utilizing concrete slab-on-grade. The gas canopy may be supported on drilled piers. Foundation loads are anticipated to be light to moderate. On-site parking and landscaping are also planned to be associated with the development.

In the event, these structural or grading details are inconsistent with the final design criteria, the Soils Engineer should be notified so that we may update this writing as applicable.

SITE LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION
The site is irregular in shape and encompasses approximately 6 acres. The site is located approximately 300 feet east of Ventura Drive, just north of Buchanan Road in Pittsburg, California. A park is located south of the site. An underground canal trends along the northern edge of the site. The remainder of the site is predominately surrounded by residential and commercial developments.

Presently, the site is occupied by remnants of a previous commercial development. A building is located in the south-central portion of the site. A cellular tower is located within the southern portion of the site. An approximately 18 to 22 foot deep excavation is located in the northern portion of the site.

Grading activities had been performed within the site and vicinity. Several piles of fill soil are located throughout the site. Portions of the site are covered by a moderate weed growth and the surface soils have a loose consistency. Portions of the site are covered with concrete and asphaltic concrete pavements. The proposed building areas are relatively level with no changes in grade. However, downward slopes are located along the northern edges of the proposed building areas. The downward slopes range from 14 to 56 degrees and approximately 18 to 22 feet deep.

GEOLOGIC SETTING
The project area is located in the northeastern portion of the San Francisco Bay Area, south of Suisun Bay adjacent to the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta along the eastern margin and within the northern portion of the Coast Ranges Geomorphic Province of California. The Coast Ranges generally consist of an alternating series of parallel mountains and valleys located adjacent to the Pacific Coast. The bedrock units that form the range have been disrupted by intense folding, faulting, and crushing that occurred when the range was formed by the processes of plate tectonics. During the Jurassic and Cretaceous Periods (about 150 to 80 million years ago), the Pacific Oceanic Plate, which was Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convenience Store).doc
290
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 3
progressively moving towards the east, collided with the North American Continental Plate, which was moving toward the west. This collision caused the less rigid Pacific Oceanic Plate to be subducted beneath the North American Continental Plate. The colliding motion of the two plates caused portions of the Pacific Oceanic Crust and overlying marine sediments to be piled onto the North American Continental Plate along the west coast of California. The resulting chaotic jumble of bedrock units scraped off onto the North American Plate, is known as the "Franciscan Assemblage" and comprises a large portion of the Coast Range Province. Subsequent development of a series of northwest-trending fault zones has further contributed to the deformation of the Coast Range.

The near-surface deposits in the vicinity of the subject site are indicated to be comprised of Quaternary alluvium consisting of sands, silt, and clays derived from erosion of local mountain ranges. Deposits encountered on the subject site during exploratory drilling are discussed in detail in this report.

Seven major faults are located near the site: the Great Valley fault, the Greenville fault, the Concord/Green Valley fault, the Mount Diablo fault, the Calaveras fault, the Hayward fault, and the West Napa fault. The Great Valley fault is located approximately 1.6 miles east of the site and is capable of producing an earthquake event of magnitude 6.5. The Mount Diablo Thrust fault is located approximately 13 miles southwest of the site and is considered capable of producing an earthquake of magnitude of 6.7. The Greenville fault is located approximately 8.1 miles south of the site and is considered capable of producing an earthquake of magnitude of 6. 7. The Concord/Green Valley fault is approximately 9.1 miles west of the site and is considered capable of producing an earthquake of magnitude 6. 7. The Calaveras fault is located approximately 15 miles southwest of the site and is capable of producing an earthquake of magnitude 6.9. The West Napa fault is located approximately 24 miles northwest of the site and is capable of producing an earthquake event of magnitude 6.5. The Hayward fault is located approximately 22 miles west of the site. The Hayward fault is considered capable of producing an earthquake event of magnitude 7 .0. The last recorded movement of the Hayward fault was in 1868. The San Andreas fault is located approximately 40 miles west of the site, and was the source of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake. Although the site is in close proximity to several faults, the site is not within a State of California Earthquake Fault Zone or Special Study Zone for faulting.

The probability of one or more earthquakes of magnitude 6. 7 or higher occurring in the San Francisco Bay Area within a 30-year period of time was evaluated by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities on a periodic basis. The result of the 2008 evaluation indicated a 63 percent likelihood that such an earthquake event will occur in the Bay Area between 2007 and 2036 (USGS 2008). The faults with the greater probability of a magnitude 6.7 or higher earthquake are the Hayward fault at 31 percent and the San Andreas fault at 21 percent.

The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act went into effect in March, 1973. Since that time, the act has been amended 11 times (Hart, 2007). The purpose of the Act, as provided in CGS Special Publication 42 (SP 42), is to prohibit the location of most structures for human occupancy across the traces of active faults and to mitigate thereby the hazard of fault-rupture." The act was renamed the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act in 1994, and at that time, the originally designated "Special Studies Zones" was renamed the "Earthquake Fault Zones." Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convenience Store).doc
291
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 4
The area of the subject site is not included on any Earthquake Fault Zones Map as of this report date. In addition, the site is not within a Fault-Rupture Hazard Zone. The nearest zoned faults are a portion of the Greenville fault located more than 8 miles south of the subject site.

In 1990, the California State Legislature passed the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act to protect public safety from the effects of strong shaking, liquefaction, landslides, or other ground failure, and other hazards caused by earthquakes. The Act requires that the State Geologist delineate various seismic hazards zones on Seismic Hazards Zones Maps. Specifically, the maps identify areas where soil liquefaction and earthquake-induced landslides are most likely to occur. A site-specific geotechnical evaluation is required prior to permitting most urban developments within the mapped zones. The Act also requires sellers of real property within the zones to disclose this fact to potential buyers. The area of the subject site is not included on any of the State designated Seismic Hazard Zone Maps as of this report date. In addition, the site is not included on the U.S. Geological Survey map entitled "Liquefaction Susceptibility, Central San Francisco Bay Region, California" (U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1037), dated 2006. However, the site is included on the U.S. Geological Survey map entitled "Preliminary Maps of Quaternary Deposits and Liquefaction Susceptibility, Nine-County San Francisco Bay Region, California" (U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2000-444), dated 2000. The site is located within an area identified as a low susceptibility to liquefaction.

FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
Subsurface soil conditions were explored by drilling 5 borings to depths ranging from approximately 10 to 50 feet below existing site grade, using a truck-mounted drill rig. In addition, 1 bulk subgrade sample was obtained from the site for laboratory R-value testing. The approximate boring and bulk sample locations are shown on the site plan. During drilling operations, samples were obtained at regular intervals to evaluate the soil consistency and to obtain information regarding the engineering properties of the subsoils. Soil samples were retained for laboratory testing. The soils encountered were continuously examined and visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. A more detailed description of the field investigation is presented in Appendix A.

Laboratory tests were performed on selected soil samples to evaluate their physical characteristics and engineering properties. The laboratory testing program was formulated with emphasis on the evaluation of natural moisture, density, gradation, expansion potential, R-value, consolidation potential, and moisture-density relationships of the materials encountered. In addition, chemical tests were performed to evaluate the corrosivity of the soils to buried concrete and metal. Details of the laboratory test program and results of the laboratory tests are summarized in Appendix A. This information, along with the field observations, was used to prepare the final boring logs in Appendix A.

SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Based on our findings, the subsurface conditions encountered appear typical of those found in the geologic region of the site. In general, the pavement section consisted of approximately 2 inches of asphaltic concrete underlain by 3 to 4 inches of aggregate base.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 R.eport (Convenience Store).doc 292
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 5
Within areas not covered by pavement, the surface soils consisted of approximately 6 to 12 inches of very loose gravelly silty sand or soft sandy clay. These soils are disturbed, have low strength characteristics, and are highly compressible when saturated.

Beneath the loose surface soils and pavement section, approximately 3 to 8 feet of fill material was encountered. The fill material predominately consisted of gravelly silty sand and sandy clay. Some of the sandy clay contained gravel. The thickness and extent of fill was determined based on limited test borings and visual observation. Thicker fill may be present at the site. Limited testing was performed on the fill soils during the time of our field and laboratory investigation. The limited testing indicates the fill soil had varying strength characteristics ranging from loosely placed to compacted.

Beneath the pavement section, loose surface soils and fill material, approximately 3 to 4 feet of very stiff to hard sandy clay was encountered. Field and laboratory tests suggest that these soils are moderately strong, slightly compressible and have a high swell potential. Penetration resistance ranged from 29 to 47 blows per foot. Dry densities ranged from 115 to 128 pcf. A representative soil sample consolidated approximately 1 percent under a 2 ksf load when saturated. A representative sample of the clayey soil had an expansion index of 102.

Below 6 to 12 feet, layers of sandy clay, sandy silt, clayey silt/silty clay with sand, sandy silt with clay or silty sand with gravel were encountered. Penetration resistance ranged from 29 to 54 blows per foot.

Dry densities ranged from 93 to 108 pcf. These soils had slightly stronger strength characteristics than the upper soils and extended to the termination depth of our borings.

For additional information about the soils encountered, please refer to the logs of borings in Appendix A.

GROUNDWATER
Test boring locations were checked for the presence of groundwater during and immediately following the drilling operations. Free groundwater was not encountered within the depths explored. However, a historic groundwater depth of 20 feet was determined for the project site and vicinity.

It should be recognized that water table elevations may fluctuate with time, being dependent upon seasonal precipitation, irrigation, land use and climatic conditions, as well as other factors. Therefore, water level observations at the time of the field investigation may vary from those encountered during the construction phase of the project. The evaluation of such factors is beyond the scope of this report.

SOIL LIQUEFACTION
Soil liquefaction is a state of soil particles suspension caused by a complete loss of strength when the effective stress drops to zero. Liquefaction normally occurs under saturated conditions in soils such as sand in which the strength is purely frictional. However, liquefaction has occurred in soils other than clean sand. Liquefaction usually occurs under vibratory conditions such as those induced by seismic event.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 293
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 6
To evaluate the liquefaction potential of the site, the following items were evaluated:
1) Soil type
2) Groundwater depth
3) Relative density
4) fuitial confining pressure
5) futensity and duration of groundshaking
The predominant soils within the project site consist of layers of gravelly silty sand, sandy clay, sandy clay with gravel, clayey silt/silty clay, sandy silt, silty sand and silty sand with gravel. Groundwater was not encountered within a depth of 50 feet during our exploratory drilling. However, groundwater has been historically encountered at depths as shallow as 20 feet below site grade within the project site and vicinity.

The potential for soil liquefaction during a seismic event was evaluated using the LIQUEFYPRO computer program (version 5.8h) developed by CivilTech Software. For the analysis, a maximum earthquake magnitude of 6.51 was used. A peak horizontal ground surface acceleration of 0.593g was considered conservative and appropriate for the liquefaction analysis within the area. A high groundwater depth of 20 feet was used for the analysis. The computer analysis indicates that soils above a depth of 20 feet are non-liquefiable due to the absence of groundwater. The soils below depths of 20 feet have a very low potential for liquefaction with factors of safety of 5.0. The analysis also indicates that the estimated total seismic induced settlement due to soil liquefaction is less than approximately ¼ inch. The estimated differential seismic settlements were less than ½ inch over the width of the structures. Due to the relative density of the granular soils encountered at the site, the moderate penetration resistance (N-values) measured, as well as the anticipated low to moderate seismicity of the area, warrant the conclusion that the potential for liquefaction and related settlement is low at this site and no liquefaction mitigation procedures are necessary for this project.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of our field and laboratory investigations, along with previous geotechnical experience in the project area, the following is a summary of our evaluations, conclusions, and recommendations.

Administrative Summarv
fu brief, the subject site and soil conditions, with the exception of the loose surface soils, fill material, slopes, and existing development, appear to be conducive to the development of the project. The surface soils are disturbed, have low strength characteristics, and are highly compressible when saturated. Accordingly, it is recommended that the surface soils be recompacted. This compaction effort should stabilize the upper soils and locate any unsuitable or pliant areas not found during our field investigation.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 294
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 7
Portions of the site are covered with approximately 2 inches of asphaltic concrete underlain by 3 to 4 inches of aggregate base. Beneath the pavement section, approximately 3 to 8 feet of fill material was encountered. The fill material predominately consisted of gravelly silty sand and sandy clay. The sandy clay soils were intermixed with varying amounts of gravel. The thickness and extent of fill material was determined based on limited test borings and visual observation. Thicker fill may be present at the site.

Limited testing was performed on the fill soils during the time of our field and laboratory investigation.

The limited testing indicates the fill soil had varying strength characteristics ranging from loosely placed to compacted. Therefore, it is recommended that the fill soils be excavated and stockpiled so that the native soils can be properly prepared. The fill material will be suitable for reuse as general Engineered Fill, provided it is cleansed of excessive organics, debris, and fragments larger than 4 inches in maximum dimension. The clayey soils will not be suitable for re-use as non-expansive Engineered Fill. Prior to backfilling the bottom of the excavation should be inspected by Krazan & Associates, Inc. to verify no additional removal is required.

The on-site clayey soils appear to have a high shrink/swell potential. To reduce potential soil movement related to shrink/swell potential of the clayey soils, it is recommended that slab-on-grade and exterior flatwork areas be supported by at least 30 inches of non-expansive Engineered Fill. The fill material should be a well-graded silty sand or sandy silt soil. A clean sand or very sandy soil is not acceptable for this purpose. A sandy soil will allow the surface water to drain into the expansive soils below, which may result in soil swelling. The replacement soils and/or upper 30 inches of Imported Fill soils should meet the specifications as described under the subheading Engineered Fill. The replacement soils should extend 5 feet beyond the perimeter of slab-on-grade areas. The non-expansive replacement soils should be compacted to at least 90 percent of relative compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557. The exposed native soils in the excavation should not be allowed to dry out and should be kept continually moist, prior to backfilling. In addition, it is recommended that slab-on-grade, continuous footings and slabs be nominally reinforced to reduce cracking and vertical off-set.

As an alternative to the use of non-expansive soils, the upper 30 inches of soil supporting slab-on-grade areas can consist of lime-treated clayey soils. The lime-treated soils should be recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density. Preliminary application rate of lime should be 5 percent by dry weight. The lime material should be calcium oxide, commonly known as quick-lime. The clayey soils should be at or above optimum moisture during the mixing operations.

Several structures are located within the site. In addition, several structures previously occupied the site. Associated with these developments are buried structures, such as utility lines that may extend into portions of the site. Demolition activities should include removal of any buried structures. Any buried structures, including utilities or loosely backfilled excavations encountered during construction should be properly removed and the resulting excavations backfilled. After demolition activities, it is recommended that these disturbed soils be removed and/or recompacted. This compaction effort should stabilize the upper soils and locate any unsuitable or pliant areas not found during our field investigation.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
295 04217005 Repon (Convenience Store).doc
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 8
Several trees and shrubs are located throughout the site. Tree and shrub removal operations should include roots greater than 1 inch in diameter. The resulting excavations should be backfilled with Engineered Fill compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method D1557.

The site is located on sloping ground. It is recommended that cut and fill slopes be constructed 2: 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. In lieu of these slopes, retaining walls may be used. Cut and fill slopes may be revised as recommended by the Soils Engineer upon review of a more definitive site plan.

After completion of the recommended site preparation, the site should be suitable for shallow footing support. The proposed structure footings may be designed utilizing an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf for dead-plus-live loads. Footings should have a minimum embedment of 18 inches.

Groundwater Influence on Structures/Construction
Although we did not encounter any groundwater during our recent field investigation, seasonal perched groundwater may possibly occur during seasonal precipitation. This perched water may likely result from the infiltration of water through the upper sandy soils and perching above the underlying less permeable clayey soils. If groundwater is encountered, our firm should be consulted prior to dewatering the site. Installation of a standpipe piezometer is suggested prior to construction should groundwater levels be a concern.

In addition to the groundwater level, if earthwork is performed during or soon after periods of precipitation, the subgrade soils may become saturated, pump, or not respond to densification techniques. Typical remedial measures include discing and aerating the soil during dry weather; mixing the soil with dryer materials; removing and replacing the soil with an approved fill material; or mixing the soil with an approved lime or cement product. Our firm should be consulted prior to implementing remedial measures to observe the unstable subgrade conditions and provide appropriate recommendations.

Site Preparation
General site clearing should include removal of vegetation; existing utilities; structures including foundations; basement walls and floors; existing stockpiled soil; trees and associated root systems; rubble; rubbish; and any loose and/or saturated materials. Site stripping should extend to a minimum depth of 2 to 4 inches, or until all organics in excess of 3 percent by volume are removed. Deeper stripping may be required in localized areas. These materials will not be suitable for use as Engineered Fill. However, stripped topsoil may be stockpiled and reuse in landscape or non-structural areas.

Approximately 3 to 8 feet of fill material was encountered within the borings drilled throughout the site.

The fill material predominately consisted of gravelly silty sand and sandy clay. The sandy clay soils contained varying amounts of gravel. The thickness and extent of fill material was determined based on limited test borings and visual observation. Thicker fill may be present at the site. Limited testing was performed on the fill soils during the time of our field and laboratory investigation. The limited testing indicates the fill soil had varying strength characteristics ranging from loosely placed to compacted.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convtnience Store).doc 296
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 9
Therefore, it is recommended that the fill soils be excavated and stockpiled so that the native soils can be properly prepared. The fill material will be suitable for reuse as general Engineered Fill, provided it is cleansed of excessive organics, debris, and fragments larger than 4 inches in maximum dimension.

The clayey soils will not be suitable for re-use as non-expansive Engineered Fill. Prior to backfilling the bottom of the excavation should be inspected by Krazan & Associates, Inc. to verify no additional removal is required.

Several structures are located within the site. In addition, several structures previously occupied the site. Associated with these developments are buried structures, such as utility lines. Demolition activities should include proper removal of any buried structures. Any buried utilities encountered during construction should be properly removed and/or relocated and the resulting excavation backfilled. Disturbed areas caused by demolition activities should be removed and recompacted.

Excavations, depressions, or soft and pliant areas extending below planned finished subgrade levels should be cleaned to firm, undisturbed soil and backfilled with Engineered Fill. In general, any septic tanks, debris pits, cesspools, or similar structures should be entirely removed. Concrete footings should be removed to an equivalent depth of at least 3 feet below proposed footing elevations or as recommended by the Soils Engineer. Any other buried structures should be removed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer. The resulting excavations should be backfilled with Engineered Fill.

Following stripping, fill removal operations, and demolition activities, the exposed subgrade in building pad areas should be excavated to a depth of at least 12 inches, worked until uniform and free from large clods, moisture-conditioned to a minimum of 2 percent above optimum moisture content, and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method Dl557.

Prior to backfilling, the exposed subgrade should be proofrolled and observed by Krazan & Associates, Inc. to verify stability. Soft and pliant areas should be excavated to firm native ground.

Following stripping, fill removal operations, demolition activities and prior to fill placement, the exposed subgrade in pavement and exterior flatwork areas should be excavated/scarified to a depth of at least 12 inches, worked until uniform and free from large clods, moisture-conditioned to a minimum of 2 percent above optimum moisture content, and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. This compaction effort should stabilize the surface soils and locate any unsuitable or pliant areas not found during our field investigation.

It is recommended that the upper 30 inches of soil within proposed slab-on-grade and exterior flatwork areas consist of non-expansive Engineered Fill or lime-treated Engineered Fill. The fill placement serves two functions: 1) it provides a uniform amount of soil which will more evenly distribute the soil pressures and 2) it reduces moisture content fluctuation in the clayey material beneath the building area.

The non-expansive fill material should be a well-graded silty sand or sandy silt soil. A clean sand or very sandy soil is not acceptable for this purpose. A sandy soil will allow the surface water to drain into the expansive clayey soil below, which may result in soil swelling. Imported Fill should be approved by the Soils Engineer prior to placement. The fill should be placed as specified as Engineered Fill.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 297
KA Project No. 042-17005
PageNo. 10
It is recommended that any uncertified fill material encountered within pavement areas, be removed and/or recompacted. The fill materials should be moisture-conditioned to near optimum moisture and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method Dl557.

As an alternative, the Owner may elect not to recompact the existing fill within paved areas. However, the Owner should be aware that the paved areas may settle which may require annual maintenance. At a minimum, it is recommended that the upper 12 inches of subgrade soil be moisture-conditioned as necessary and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method D1557.

The site is located adjacent to sloping ground. It is recommended that any cut and fill slopes be constructed 2: 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. In lieu of the recommended slopes, retaining walls may be used. In addition, structures should have a minimum setback of 20 feet from the top of the reconstructed slopes.

Where fills greater than 8 feet are to be constructed on original ground that slopes at inclinations exceeding 6: 1 (horizontal to vertical), benches should be cut into the natural slope as the filling operations proceed. Each bench should consist of a level terrace a minimum of 8 feet wide, with the rise to the next bench held for 4 feet or less. Where fills of comparable height will be constructed on ground that slopes at an inclination exceeding 4: 1 (horizontal to vertical), a keyway should be provided in addition to the benches. Each keyway should consist of a level trench at least 8 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, with side slopes not exceeding 1: 1 (horizontal to vertical), cut into the natural slope.

The upper soils, during wet winter months, become very moist due to the absorptive characteristics of the soil. Earthwork operations performed during winter months may encounter very moist unstable soils, which may require removal to grade a stable building foundation. Project site winterization consisting of placement of aggregate base and protecting exposed soils during the construction phase should be performed.

A representative of our firm should be present during all site clearing and grading operations to test and observe earthwork construction. This testing and observation is an integral part of our service as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction of the material and the stability of the material. The Soils Engineer may reject any material that does not meet compaction and stability requirements. Further recommendations of this report are predicated upon the assumption that earthwork construction will conform to recommendations set forth in this section and the Engineered Fill section.

Slope Construction/Reconstruction
Slopes can be reconstructed by placement of Engineered Fill utilizing a keying and benching procedure as described below. Reconstructed slopes should be constructed at an inclination not exceeding 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). Krazan and Associates, Inc. should be retained to review all slope reconstruction plans and specifications prior to initiating the repair work.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Roport (Convenience Store).doc 298
KA Project No. 042-17005
PageNo. 11
General site clearing should include removal of vegetation, any loose and/or saturated materials.

Excavations or depressions extending below subgrade levels should be cleaned to firm, undisturbed soil and backfilled with Engineered Fill, placed and recompacted in accordance with the recommendations stated herein.

Where fills greater than 8 feet are to be constructed on original ground that slopes at inclinations steeper than 6:1 (horizontal to vertical), benches should be cut into the existing slope as the filling operations proceed. Each bench should consist of a level terrace a minimum of 8 feet wide, with the rise to the next bench held to 4 feet or less. Where fills of comparable height will be constructed on ground that slopes at an inclination steeper than 4: 1 (horizontal to vertical), a keyway should be provided in addition to the benches. Each keyway should consist of a level trench at least 8 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, with side slopes not exceeding 1: 1 (horizontal to vertical), cut into the existing slope. Where fills of comparable height will be constructed on ground that slopes at an inclination steeper than 2: 1 (horizontal to vertical), geotextile fabric and retaining structures should be utilized in slope construction where subsequent specific building site investigations warrant.

Site grading near the crowns of the reconstructed slopes should be accomplished such that excessive sheet run-off is prevented.

The completed slopes should be seeded or otherwise vegetated to protect from future erosion. Well vegetated slopes at the recommended configuration should be reasonably protected from typical erosional effects. However, vegetated slopes may not be protected from unusual flow conditions, such as flood events or over-topping of the development's storm drainage system. If erosion control from unusual flow conditions is desired, more substantial erosion protection measures, such as grouted cobble slope facing or manufactured slope protection products should be considered.

Engineered Fill
The on-site, native soils are predominately gravelly silty sand, sandy clay and sandy clay with gravel.

The clayey soils will not be suitable for reuse as non-expansive Engineered Fill. The clayey soils will be suitable for reuse for fill placement within the upper 30 inches of slab-on-grade and exterior flatwork areas, provided they are lime-treated. The preliminary application rate of lime should be 5 percent by dry weight. The lime material should be calcium oxide, commonly known as quick-lime. The clayey soils should be at or near optimum moisture content during mixing operations. Additional testing is recommended to determine the appropriate application rate of lime prior to placement. These clayey soils will be suitable for reuse as General Engineered Fill, within pavement areas and below 30 inches from finished grade in slab-on-grade areas, provided they are cleansed of excessive organics, debris, and moisture-conditioned to at least 2 percent above optimum moisture. It is recommended that additional testing be performed on the on-site soils and fill material to evaluate the physical and index properties prior to reuse as Engineered Fill. The soils that do not contain clay will be suitable for reuse as non-expansive Engineered Fill provided they are cleansed of excessive organics and debris.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 299
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 12
The preferred materials specified for Engineered Fill are suitable for most applications with the exception of exposure to erosion. Project site winterization and protection of exposed soils during the construction phase should be the sole responsibility of the Contractor, since he has complete control of the project site at that time.

Imported non-expansive Fill should consist of a well-graded, slightly cohesive, fine silty sand or sandy silt soil, with relatively impervious characteristics when compacted. This material should be approved by the Soils Engineer prior to use and should typically possess the following characteristics:

Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve 20 to 50
Plasticity Index l0maximum
UBC Standard 29-2 Expansion Index 15 maximum
Fill soils should be placed in lifts approximately 6 inches thick, moisture-conditioned as necessary, and compacted to achieve at least 95 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method D1557.

Additional lifts should not be placed if the previous lift did not meet the required dry density or if soil conditions are not stable.

Drainage and Landscaping
The ground surface should slope away from building pad and pavement areas toward appropriate drop inlets or other surface drainage devices. In accordance with Section 1804 of the 2016 California Building Code, it is recommended that the ground surface adjacent to foundations be sloped a minimum of 5 percent for a minimum distance of 10 feet away from structures, or to an approved alternative means of drainage conveyance. Swales used for conveyance of drainage and located within 10 feet of foundations should be sloped a minimum of 2 percent. Impervious surfaces, such as pavement and exterior concrete flatwork, within 10 feet of building foundations should be sloped a minimum of 1 percent away from the structure. Drainage gradients should be maintained to carry all surface water to collection facilities and off-site. These grades should be maintained for the life of the project.

Grade the site to prevent water/run-off flow over the face of cut and fill slopes. To accomplish this, use asphalt berms, brow ditches, or other measures to intercept and slowly redirect flow. Plant all disturbed areas with erosion-resistant vegetation suited to the area. As an alternative, jute netting or geotextile erosion control mats may be considered for control of erosion. Slopes should be inspected periodically for erosion and repaired immediately if detected. Where only 1 drainage terrace is necessary, it should be located at mid-height of the slope. Brow ditches and drainage terraces should be cleaned before the start of each rainy season and, if necessary, after each rainstorm.

Slots or weep holes should be placed in drop inlets or other surface drainage devices in pavement areas to allow free drainage of adjoining base course materials. Cutoff walls should be installed at pavement edges adjacent to vehicular traffic areas; these walls should extend to a minimum depth of 12 inches below pavement subgrades to limit the amount of seepage water that can infiltrate the pavements.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
0421 7005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 300
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 13
Where cutoff walls are undesirable, subgrade drains can be constructed to transport excess water away from planters to drainage interceptors. If cutoff walls can be successfully used at the site, construction of subgrade drains is considered unnecessary.

Utility Trench Backfill
Utility trenches should be excavated according to accepted engineering practices following OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) standards by a Contractor experienced in such work.

The responsibility for the safety of open trenches should be borne by the Contractor. Traffic and vibration adjacent to trench walls should be reduced; cyclic wetting and drying of excavation side slopes should be avoided. Depending upon the location and depth of some utility trenches, groundwater flow into open excavations could be experienced, especially during or shortly following periods of precipitation.

Utility trench backfill placed in or adjacent to buildings and exterior slabs should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. The utility trench backfill placed in pavement areas should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Pipe bedding should be in accordance with pipe manufacturer's recommendations.

The Contractor is responsible for removing all water-sensitive soils from the trench regardless of the backfill location and compaction requirements. The Contractor should use appropriate equipment and methods to avoid damage to the utilities and/or structures during fill placement and compaction.

Foundations - Conventional
The proposed structures may be supported on a shallow foundation system bearing on the undisturbed native soil or on Engineered Fill. Structures should have a minimum setback of 20 feet from the existing slopes. Spread and continuous footings can be designed for the following maximum allowable soil bearing pressures:

Load Allowable Loading
Dead Load Only 1,875 psf
Dead-Plus-Live Load 2,500 psf
Total Load, including wind or seismic loads 3,325 psf
The footings should have a minimum embedment depth of 18 inches below pad subgrade (soil grade), adjacent exterior grade. The footings should have a minimum width of 12 inches, regardless ofload.

The total soil movement is not expected to exceed 1 inch. Differential soil movement should be less than ½ inch. Most of the settlement is expected to occur during construction as the loads are applied.

However, additional post-construction settlement may occur if the foundation soils are flooded or saturated.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
042 17005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 301
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 14
The footing excavations should not be allowed to dry out any time prior to pouring concrete. It is recommended that footings be reinforced by at least one No. 4 reinforcing bar in both top and bottom.

Resistance to lateral footing displacement can be computed using an allowable friction factor of 0.30 acting between the base of foundations and the supporting subgrade. Lateral resistance for footings can alternatively be developed using an allowable equivalent fluid passive pressure of 250 pounds per cubic foot acting against the appropriate vertical footing faces. The frictional and passive resistance of the soil may be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance. A½ increase in the above value may be used for short duration, wind, or seismic loads. All of the above earth pressures are unfactored and are, therefore, not inclusive of factors of safety.

Foundations - Drilled Caissons
The proposed gas canopy can be supported on drilled caissons using an allowable sidewall friction of 400 psf. This value is for dead-plus-live loads. This value may be increased ½ for short duration loads, such as wind or seismic. Uplift loads can be resisted by caissons using an allowable sidewall friction of 225 psf of the surface area and the weight of the pier. Caissons should have a minimum embedment depth of 6 feet below existing site grade or bottomed at least 3 feet into the firm native soil, whichever is greater. The upper 2 feet should be neglected from friction calculations. The total and differential settlement should be less than ½ inch. Most of the settlement is expected to occur during construction as the loads are applied. If drilled piers or caissons will be utilized, no over-excavation of the fill and native soils will be required.

Lateral loads for caissons may be designed using the 2016 CBC flagpole formula with a lateral bearing capacity of 150 psf/ft. This value can be doubled for allowable deflections of up to ½ inch. The lateral loading criteria is based on the assumption that the load application is applied at the ground level and flexible cap conditions apply.

Sandy and gravelly soils were encountered at the site. These sandy and gravelly soils may be subject to caving during drilling operations. Accordingly, cased caissons may be required.

Floor Slabs and Exterior Flatwork
If conventional slab-on-grade construction will be utilized, it is recommended that the upper 30 inches of soil beneath the concrete slabs should consist of non-expansive Engineered Fill or lime-treated Engineered Fill. The floor slab should be reinforced at a minimum with #3 reinforcing bars at 18 inches on-center each way. Thicker floor slabs with increased concrete strength and reinforcement should be designed wherever heavy concentrated loads, heavy equipment, or machinery is anticipated.

Concrete slab-on-grade floors should be underlain by a water vapor retarder. The water vapor retarder should be installed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. The water vapor retarder should consist of a vapor retarder sheeting underlain by a minimum of 3 inches of compacted, clean, gravel of ¾-inch maximum size. To aid in concrete curing an optional 2 to 4 inches of granular fill may be placed on top of the vapor retarder. The granular fill should consist of damp clean sand with at least 10 to 30 Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
042 17005 Report (Convenience Store).doc
302
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 15
percent of the sand passing the 100 sieve. The sand should be free of clay, silt or organic material.

Rock dust which is manufactured sand from rock crushing operations is typically suitable for the granular fill. This granular fill material should be compacted.

The exterior floors should be poured separately in order to act independently of the walls and foundation system. All fills required to bring the building pads to grade should be Engineered Fills.

Moisture within the structure may be derived from water vapors, which were transformed from the moisture within the soils. This moisture vapor can travel through the vapor membrane and penetrate the slab-on-grade. This moisture vapor penetration can affect floor coverings and produce mold and mildew in the structure. To reduce moisture vapor intrusion, it is recommended that a vapor retarder be installed. It is recommended that the utility trenches within the structure be compacted, as specified in our report, to reduce the transmission of moisture through the utility trench backfill. Special attention to the immediate drainage and irrigation around the building is recommended. Positive drainage should be established away from the structure and should be maintained throughout the life of the structure.

Ponding of water should not be allowed adjacent to the structure. Over-irrigation within landscaped areas adjacent to the structure should not be performed. In addition, ventilation of the structure (i.e. ventilation fans) is recommended to reduce the accumulation of interior moisture.

Lateral Earth Pressures and Retaining Walls
Walls retaining horizontal backfill and capable of deflecting a minimum of 0.1 percent of its height at the top may be designed using an equivalent fluid active pressure of 50 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. Walls that are incapable of this deflection or walls that are fully constrained against deflection may be designed for an equivalent fluid at-rest pressure of 70 pounds per square foot per foot per depth.

Expansive soils should not be used for backfill against walls. The wedge of non-expansive backfill material should extend from the bottom of each retaining wall outward and upward at a slope of 2: 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. The stated lateral earth pressures do not include the effects of hydrostatic water pressures generated by infiltrating surface water that may accumulate behind the retaining walls; or loads imposed by construction equipment, foundations, or roadways. All of the above earth pressures are unfactored and are, therefore, not inclusive of factors of safety.

During grading and backfilling operations adjacent to any walls, heavy equipment should not be allowed to operate within a lateral distance of 5 feet from the wall, or within a lateral distance equal to the wall height, whichever is greater, to avoid developing excessive lateral pressures. Within this zone, only hand-operated equipment ("whackers," vibratory plates, or pneumatic compactors) should be used to compact the backfill soils.

Retaining and/or below grade walls should be drained with either perforated pipe encased in freedraining gravel or a prefabricated drainage system. The gravel zone should have a minimum width of 12 inches wide and should extend upward to within 12 inches of the top of the wall. The upper 12 inches of backfill should consist of native soils, concrete, asphaltic concrete or other suitable backfill to reduce surface drainage into the wall drain system. The aggregate should conform to Class 2 permeable materials graded in accordance with Section 68-2.02F(3) of the CalTrans Standard Specifications Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
303 0421700S Report (Convenience Storc).doc
KA Project No. 042-17005
PageNo. 16
(2010). Prefabricated drainage systems, such as Miradrain®, Enkadrain®, or an equivalent substitute, are acceptable alternatives in lieu of gravel provided they are installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. If a prefabricated drainage system is proposed, our firm should review the system for final acceptance prior to installation.

Drainage pipes should be placed with perforations down and should discharge in a non-erosive manner away from foundations and other improvements. The pipes should be placed no higher than 6 inches above the heel of the wall in the centerline of the drainage blanket and should have a minimum diameter of 4 inches. Collector pipes may be either slotted or perforated. Slots should be no wider than ½ inch in diameter, while perforations should be no more than ¼ inch in diameter. If retaining walls are less than 6 feet in height, the perforated pipe may be omitted in lieu of weep holes on 4 feet maximum spacing. The weep holes should consist of 4-inch diameter holes (concrete walls) or unmortared head joints (masonry walls) and not be higher than 18 inches above the lowest adjacent grade. Two 8-inch square overlapping patches of geotextile fabric (conforming to Section 88-1.02 of the CalTrans Standard Specifications for "edge drains") should be affixed to the rear wall opening of each weep hole to retard soil piping.

R-Value Test Results and Pavement Design
One R-value sample was obtained from the project site at the location shown on the attached site plan.

The sample was tested in accordance with the State of California Materials Manual Test Designation 301. Results of the test are as follows:

Sample Depth Description R-Value at Equilibrium
1 12-24" Sandy Clay (CL) Less than 5
The test result is low and indicates poor subgrade support characteristics under dynamic traffic loads.

The following table shows the recommended pavement sections for various traffic indices.

Traffic Asphaltic Class II Class III Compacted
Index Concrete Aggre2ate Base* A22:re2ate Subbase Sube:rade**

4.0 2.0" 8.5" -- 12.0"

4.0 2.0" 4.5" 4.5" 12.0"

4.5 2.5" 9.0" -- 12.0"

4.5 2.5" 4.0" 5.5" 12.0"

5.0 2.5" 11.0" -- 12.0"

5.0 2.5" 5.0" 6.5" 12.0"

5.5 3.0" 11.5" -- 12.0"

5.5 3.0" 5.0" 7.0" 12.0"

6.0 3.0" 13.5" -- 12.0"
Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
042 17005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 304

6.0 6.5

6.5 7.0

7.0 7.5

7.5 3.0" 6.5" 8.0"

3.5" 14.0" --

3.5" 6.0" 9.0"

4.0" 15.5" --

4.0" 6.5" 10.0"

4.0" 17.0" --

4.0" 7.5" 10.5"
* 95% compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557 or CAL 216 ** 90% compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557 or CAL 216 KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 17

12.0"

12.0"
If traffic indices are not available, an estimated (typical value) index of 4.5 may be used for light automobile traffic, and an index of 7 .0 may be used for light truck traffic.

The following recommendations are for light-duty and heavy-duty Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Sections based on the design procedures developed by the Portland Cement Association.

Traffic Index

4.5 Traffic Index

7.0 PORTLAND CEMENT PAVEMENT

LIGHT DUTY
Portland Cement Concrete*** Class II Ag2}"egate Base* Compacted Subgrade**

6.0" 5.0" 12.0"

HEAVY DUTY
Portland Cement Concrete*** Class II Aggregate Base* Compacted Subgrade**

7.0" 6.0"
* 95% compaction based on ASTM Test Method Dl557 or CAL 216 ** 90% compaction based on ASTM Test Method DJ 557 or CAL 216 ***Minimum Compressive Strength of 3000 psi

12.0"
It is recommended that any uncertified fill material encountered within pavement areas, be removed and/or recompacted. The fill materials should be moisture-conditioned to near optimum moisture and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method D1557.

Seismic Parameters - 2016 California Building Code
The Site Class per Section 1613 of the 2016 California Building Code (2016 CBC) and Table 20.3-1 of ASCE 7-10 is based upon the site soil conditions. It is our opinion that a Site Class Dis most consistent with the subject site soil conditions. For seismic design of the structures based on the seismic provisions of the 2016 CBC, we recommend the following parameters:

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convenience Storc).doc 305
Seismic Item
Site Class
Site Coefficient Fa
Ss
SMs
Sos
Site Coefficient Fv
S1
SM!
Sm
Soil Cement Reactivity
Value
D

1.000

1.563

1.042

1.500

0.600

0.900

0.600
CBC Reference
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 18
Section 1613.3.2
Table 1613.3.3 (1)
Section 1613.3.1
Section 1613.3.3
Section 1613.3.4
Table 1613.3.3 (2)
Section 1613.3.1
Section 1613.3.3
Section 1613.3.4
Excessive sulfate in either the soil or native water may result in an adverse reaction between the cement in concrete ( or stucco) and the soil. HUD/FHA and CBC have developed criteria for evaluation of sulfate levels and how they relate to cement reactivity with soil and/or water.

Soil samples were obtained from the site and tested in accordance with State of California Materials Manual Test Designation 417. The sulfate concentrations detected in these soil samples were greater than 150 ppm and are above the maximum allowable values established by HUD/FHA and CBC.

Therefore, it is recommended that a Type II cement be used within the concrete to compensate for sulfate reactivity with the cement.

Compacted Material Acceptance
Compaction specifications are not the only criteria for acceptance of the site grading or other such activities. However, the compaction test is the most universally recognized test method for assessing the performance of the Grading Contractor. The numerical test results from the compaction test cannot be used to predict the engineering performance of the compacted material. Therefore, the acceptance of compacted materials will also be dependent on the stability of that material. The Soils Engineer has the option of rejecting any compacted material regardless of the degree of compaction if that material is considered to be unstable or if future instability is suspected. A specific example of rejection of fill material passing the required percent compaction is a fill which has been compacted with an in situ moisture content significantly less than optimum moisture. This type of dry fill (brittle fill) is susceptible to future settlement if it becomes saturated or flooded.

Testing and Inspection
A representative of Krazan & Associates, me. should be present at the site during the earthwork activities to confirm that actual subsurface conditions are consistent with the exploratory fieldwork.

This activity is an integral part of our service, as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction testing and stability of the material. This representative can also verify that the intent Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
0421 7005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 306
KA Project No. 042-17005
PageNo. 19
of these recommendations is incorporated into the project design and construction. Krazan & Associates, Inc. will not be responsible for grades or staking, since this is the responsibility of the Prime Contractor.

LIMITATIONS
Soils Engineering is one of the newest divisions of Civil Engineering. This branch of Civil Engineering is constantly improving as new technologies and understanding of earth sciences advance. Although your site was analyzed using the most appropriate and most current techniques and methods, undoubtedly there will be substantial future improvements in this branch of engineering. In addition to advancements in the field of Soils Engineering, physical changes in the site, either due to excavation or fill placement, new agency regulations, or possible changes in the proposed structure after the soils report is completed may require the soils report to be professionally reviewed. In light of this, the Owner should be aware that there is a practical limit to the usefulness of this report without critical review. Although the time limit for this review is strictly arbitrary, it is suggested that 2 years be considered a reasonable time for the usefulness of this report.

Foundation and earthwork construction is characterized by the presence of a calculated risk that soil and groundwater conditions have been fully revealed by the original foundation investigation. This risk is derived from the practical necessity of basing interpretations and design conclusions on limited sampling of the earth. The recommendations made in this report are based on the assumption that soil conditions do not vary significantly from those disclosed during our field investigation. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, the Soils Engineer should be notified so that supplemental recommendations may be made.

The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed construction. If the proposed construction is relocated or redesigned, the conclusions in this report may not be valid. The Soils Engineer should be notified of any changes so the recommendations may be reviewed and re-evaluated.

This report is a Geotechnical Engineering Investigation with the purpose of evaluating the soil conditions in terms of foundation design. The scope of our services did not include any Environmental Site Assessment for the presence or absence of hazardous and/or toxic materials in the soil, groundwater, or atmosphere; or the presence of wetlands. Any statements, or absence of statements, in this report or on any boring log regarding odors, unusual or suspicious items, or conditions observed, are strictly for descriptive purposes and are not intended to convey engineering judgment regarding potential hazardous and/or toxic assessment.

The geotechnical engineering information presented herein is based upon professional interpretation utilizing standard engineering practices and a degree of conservatism deemed proper for this project. It is not warranted that such information and interpretation cannot be superseded by future geotechnical engineering developments. We emphasize that this report is valid for the project outlined above and should not be used for any other sites.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 307
KA Project No. 042-17005
Page No. 20
If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (925) 307-1160.

Respectfully submitted,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

SN/DRJ:ht
Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convenience Store).doc 308
/ /4· / ~-=,,,__.-- ~~ - ~ ~ '
--------
--- BUCHANAN ROAD
------------•--•--•---------------•--•--------------~--~--g--•--•- • APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION

A APPROXIMATE R-V ALUE LOCATION

SITE MAP
Convenience Store, Gas Station & Car Wash
1625 S. Buchanan Road
Pittsburg, California
Scale:

NTS
Drawn by:

HT
Project No.
042-17005
Date:

June2017
Approved by:

DJ ~:1Krazan
Figure No. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
1 309

APPENDIX A

FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
Field Investigation
Appendix A
Page A.I
The field investigation consisted of a surface reconnaissance and a subsurface exploratory program.

Five 4½-inch exploratory borings were advanced. The boring locations are shown on the site plan.

The soils encountered were logged in the field during the exploration, and with supplementary laboratory test data are described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System.

Modified standard penetration tests and standard penetration tests were performed at selected depths.

These tests represent the resistance to driving a 2½-inch and 1 ½-inch diameter split barrel sampler, respectively. The driving energy was provided by a hammer weighing 140 pounds falling 30 inches.

Relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained while performing this test. Bag samples of the disturbed soil were obtained from the auger cuttings. The modified standard penetration tests are identified in the sample type on the boring logs with a full shaded in block. The standard penetration tests are identified in the sample type on the boring logs with half of the block shaded. All samples were returned to our Clovis laboratory for evaluation.

Laboratory Investigation
The laboratory investigation was programmed to determine the physical and mechanical properties of the foundation soil underlying the site. Test results were used as criteria for determining the engineering suitability of the surface and subsurface materials encountered.

In-situ moisture content, dry density, consolidation, atterberg limits, and sieve analysis tests were completed for the undisturbed samples representative of the subsurface material. Expansion index and R-value tests were completed for select bag samples obtained from the auger cuttings. These tests, supplemented by visual observation, comprised the basis for our evaluation of the site material.

The logs of the exploratory borings and laboratory determinations are presented in this Appendix.

Krazan & Associates, Inc.

With Offices Serving The Western United States
04217005 Report (Convenience Store}.doc 310

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND SYMBOL CHART

COARSE-GRAINED SOILS
(more than 50% of material Is larger than No. 200 sieve size.) Clean Gravels (Less than 5% fines)
t•;~ GW Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand .... mixtures, little or no fines GRAVELS ii:•:,
More than 50% ~ GP Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand • !~ of coarse ~o:, mixtures, little or no fines fraction larger Gravels with fines (More than 12% fines) than No.4 sieve size GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures
~ GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay
mixtures
Clean Sands lless than 5% fines)
······ SW Well-graded sands, gravelly sands,
·.• .. •· little or no fines
SANDS :-:•:•
...... ·.:
50%ormore ....... ·. SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, •,• little or no fines of coarse :_.-::-.·· fraction smaller Sands with fines (More than 12% fines\ than No. 4 II' .. sieve size 11:::. SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures . . ~ SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures ~-. :·,

FINE-GRAINED SOILS
(50% or more of material Is smaller than No. 200 sieve size.) Inorganic sllts and very fine sands, rock
SILTS
ML flour, sllty of clayey fine sands or clayey
AND
silts with slight plasticity
CLAYS
~ Inorganic clays of low to medium
Liquid limit CL plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, less than silty clays, lean clays
50% - -
I- - - OL Organic slits and organic silty clays of - - - low plasticity I,, - - Inorganic silts, mlcaceous or
SILTS MH diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils,
elastic silts
AND
CLAYS CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat
Liquid limit clays
50%
or greater ~ Organic clays of medium to high OH plasticity, organic silts HIGHLY ~
ORGANIC ~ PT Peat and. other highly organic soils
SOILS ,"1

CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION
Description Blows per Foot
Granular Soils
Very Loose <5
Loose 5-15
Medium Dense 16-40
Dense 41-65
Very Dense >65
Cohesive Soils
Very Soft <3
Soft 3-5
Firm 6-10
Stiff 11-20
Very Stiff 21-40
Hard >40

GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION
Grain Type Standard Sieve Size Grain Size in
Millimeters
Boulders Above 12 inches Above 305
Cobbles 12 to 13 inches 305 to 76.2
Gravel 3 inches to No. 4 76.2 to4.76
Coarse-grained 3 to¾ inches 76.2 to 19.1
Fine-grained ¾ inches to No. 4 19.1 to 4.76
Sand No. 4 to No. 200 4.76 to 0.074
Coarse-grained No. 4 to No. 10 4.76 to2.00
Medium-grained No. 10 to No. 40 2.00 to 0.042
Fine-grained No. 40 to No. 200 0.042 to 0.074
Silt and Clay Below No. 200 Below0.074

PLASTICITY CHART
60 ! 50
~ ti 40
Cl
!: 30
~ ~ 20
~ 10 a. ......

CL
/ ..,_ .. . ~
,.V
CH /
V
1/i.,. ALINE:

Pl= 0·13{LL-20l
,.:/ MH&OH
V
0o 10 20 30 40 50 80 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (LL) (%)
.. ML&,OL
311
Log of Boring B1
Project: Convenience Store, Gas Station and Car Wash
Client: LMK Petro, Inc.

Location: 1625 S. Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA
Depth to Water> Initial: None

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
~
5 ,-.

Description z- ::,,e
e.....
g "iii
0 C
Q) ~ :::, ..c: .0 0 v5 - Q)
a. E c:' ·o a. Q) >, >,
0 Cl) 0 ~ I9 Ground Surface

GRAVELLY SILTY SAND (SM)
FILL, fine- to coarse-grained; light
,brown, damp, drills easily I
2 SANDY CLAY (CL)
FILL, fine-grained with GRAVEL; brown, 111.0 17.2
moist, drills easily
4 SANDY CLAY (CL)
FILL, fine- to medium-grained; light
, brown, damp, drills easily _,/
SANDY CLAY (CL) 14.9
6 FILL, fine- to coarse-grained with
GRAVEL; grayish-brown, damp, drills
easily
8 SANDY CLAY (CL)
Very stiff, fine-grained; brown, damp,
drills firmly
10 -

15.9 With GRAVEL below 14 feet
End of Borehole
16 -
18 -
20 ~ (/)
~ 0
ai
30 Drill Method: Solid Flight
Drill Rig: CME 45B
Driller: Brent Snyder
Krazan and Associates
Project No: 042-17005
Figure No.: A-1
Logged By: R. Alexander
At Completion: None
Penetration Test
blows/ft
20 40 60
Water Content(%)
10 20 30 40 I I
■
•
•
Drill Date: 4-27-17
Hole Size: 4½ Inches
Elevation: 15 Feet
312 Sheet: 1 of 1
Log of Boring 82
Project: Convenience Store, Gas Station and Car Wash
Client: LMK Petro, Inc.

Location: 1625 S. Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA
Depth to Water> Initial: None
0 .c
E
>,
Cl)

SUBSURFACE PROFILE
Description
Ground Surface
ASPHAL TIC CONCRETE = 2 inches
AGGREGATE BASE = 3 inches ./

GRAVELLY SILTY SAND (SM)
FILL, fine- to coarse-grained; brown,
damp, drills firmly

SANDY CLAY (CL)
FILL, fine-grained; light brown, damp,
drills easily

SANDY CLAY (CL)
Hard, fine- to medium-grained with trace
GRAVEL; light brown, damp, drills easily

CLAYEY SILT/SILTY CLAY (MUCL)
Dense, fine- to medium-grained with
fine-grained SAND; light brown, damp,
drills easily
Very dense and drills hard below 15 feet

SANDY SILT (ML)
Dense fine- to medium-grained with
CLAY; ligth brown, damp, drills firmly
SAMPLE
't3
s
i::- -
~
~ "in
C: ~ (I) ::, 0 "tii (I)
~ ·o a.
>,
0 ::ii: I-
, 102.7 25.3
111 .1 21.3
114.9 16.6
111.3 14.8
~ Cl)
~ 0
iD
29 50
Drill Method: Solid Flight
Drill Rig: CME 45B
Driller: Brent Snyder
Krazan and Associates
Project No: 042-17005
Figure No.: A-2
Logged By: R. Alexander
At Completion: None
Penetration Test
blows/ft
20 40 60
Water Content(%)
10 20 30 40
■
■
■
■
Drill Date: 4-27-17
Hole Size: 4½ Inches
Elevation: 50 Feet
313 Sheet: 1 of 3
Log of Boring B2
Project: Convenience Store, Gas Station and Car Wash
Client: LMK Petro, Inc.

Location: 1625 S. Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA
Depth to Water>

SUBSURFACE PROFILE
Initial: None
SAMPLE
g 0
Description
.r:.
a.

Q)
Cl
.0
E
>,
(J)

SILTY SAND (SM)
Dense, fine- to medium-grained; brown,
damp, drills easily
Very dense and drills hard below 29 feet

SANDY CLAY (CL)
Very stiff, fine-grained; light brown,
damp, drills firmly

SILTY SAND (SM)
Dense, fine- to coarse-grained with
GRAVEL; light brown, damp, drills firmly

SANDY SILT (ML)
Dense, fine-grained with trace CLAY;
light brown, damp, drills firmly
110.2 12.0
108.3 14.3
111.5 8.1

94.2 25.3
Q)
c..
~
30 Drill Method: Solid Flight
Drill Rig: CME 45B
Driller: Brent Snyder
Krazan and Associates
Project No: 042-17005
Figure No.: A-2
Logged By: R. Alexander
At Completion: None
Penetration Test
blows/ft
Water Content(%)
20 40 60 10 20 30 40
■
■
■
•
Drill Date: 4-27-17
Hole Size: 4½ Inches
Elevation: 50 Feet
Sheet: 2 of 3
I
314
Log of Boring B2
Project: Convenience Store, Gas Station and Car Wash
Client: LMK Petro, Inc.

Location: 1625 S. Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA
Depth to Water>

SUBSURFACE PROFILE
§: 0
.0
Description
.c
a.

Q)
0 E
>,
Cl)
Initial: None
SAMPLE
'§'
s
>, --::e.
'cii
- ~
C: ~ Q) ::J 0 -
Cl) Q)
~ ·15 Q.
>,
0 ~ I112.4 14.4
52 54
56 58
60 -

SILTY SAND (SM)
Dense, fine- to coarse-grained; light
brown, damp, drills firmly
End of Borehole

92.7 10.9
~ :s:
0 a5
Drill Method: Solid Flight
Drill Rig: CME 45B
Driller: Brent Snyder
Krazan and Associates
Project No: 042-17005
Figure No.: A-2
Logged By: R. Alexander
At Completion: None
Penetration Test
blows/ft
20 40 60
Water Content(%)
10 20 30 40
•
•
Drill Date: 4-27-17
Hole Size: 4½ Inches
Elevation: 50 Feet
315 Sheet: 3 of 3
Log of Boring B3
Project: Convenience Store, Gas Station and Car Wash
Client: LMK Petro, Inc.

Location: 1625 S. Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA
Depth to Water> Initial: None
g
'E.

Q)
0 16
18 20
0 .c
E
>,
Cf)

SUBSURFACE PROFILE
Description
Ground Surface

GRAVELLY SILTY SAND (SM)
FILL, fine- to coarse-grained; gray,
damp, drills easily

SANDY CLAY (CL)
FILL, fine-grained ; light brown, damp,
drills easily

SANDY CLAY (CL)
Hard, fine-grained; light brown, damp,
drills firmly

SILTY SAND (SM)
Dense, fine- to medium-grained; brown,
damp, drills firmly
End of Borehole
SAMPLE
<§'
-9:
z- -:,!'!
·u5 e.... C: ~ Q) :::J 0 -
U) Q)
~ ·5 a.
>,
0 ~ I114.5 16.8
116.9 16.1
110.3 20.0
~ rn
;\:
0 in
Drill Method: Solid Flight
Drill Rig: CME 45B
Driller: Brent Snyder
Krazan and Associates
Project No: 042-17005
Figure No.: A-3
Logged By: R. Alexander
At Completion: None
Penetration Test
blows/ft
20 40 60
Water Content{%)
10 20 30 40
•
•
■
Drill Date: 4-27-17
Hole Size: 4½ Inches
Elevation: 15 Feet
Sheet: 1 of 1 316
Log of Boring 84
Project: Convenience Store, Gas Station and Car Wash
Client: LMK Petro, Inc.

Location: 1625 S. Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA
Depth to Water> Initial: None

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
,:;::-
u
s .......

Description ~ 0 ~
'iii .._,,
g C Q)
0 ... (I) ::, .c .0 0 iii C. E Q)
c.':' ·5 a. Q) >- >- 0 en Cl ~ IGround Surface
ASPHAL TIC CONCRETE = 2 inches
AGGREGATE BASE = 4 inches ./

SANDY CLAY (CL)
FILL, fine- to medium-grained; light
brown, damp, drills easily 111.0 17.8

SANDY CLAY (CL)
Hard, fine-grained; light brown, damp,
drills firmly 116.6 18.4
End of Borehole
12 14
16 18 -
20 ~ ti)
3:
0 a:i
Drill Method: Solid Flight
Drill Rig: CME 45B
Driller: Brent Snyder
Krazan and Associates
Project No: 042-17005
Figure No.: A-4
Logged By: R. Alexander
At Completion: None
Penetration Test
blows/ft
20 40 60
Water Content (%)
10 20 30 40 t:======-=--=--=--=--=--=-----1 ....... .l . . ····-···-l ......... .. . .1. ...... ....... L. .. .. •
•
Drill Date: 4-27-17
Hole Size: 4½ Inches
Elevation: 10 Feet
Sheet: 1 of 1 317
Log of Boring B5
Project: Convenience Store, Gas Station and Car Wash
Client: LMK Petro, Inc.

Location: 1625 S. Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA
Depth to Water> Initial: None

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
13 .9; ....... z- ;,R.
~
g 0
.c
Description 'iii
C: e Q) :::, .c

15. Q)
0 E
>,
(/)
-- Ground Surface

GRAVELLY SILTY SAND (SM)
FILL, fine- to coarse-grained; light
brown, damp, drills easily
Brown below 2½ feet

SANDY CLAY (CL)
FILL, fine-grained; brown, damp, drills
easily

CLAYEY SILT/SILTY CLAY (MUCL)
Medium dense, fine-grained with finegrained SAND; light orangish-brown, damp, drills easily
Dense below 10 feet
With lenses of SAND and drills firmly
below 13½ feet
0 iii Q)
c:' ·5 a.
>,
0 ::".?: I- -
117.9 15.4
127.7 8.9
112.4 19.4
107.9 22.9
~ (/)
3:
0 iii
Drill Method: Sol id Flight
Drill Rig: CME 45B
Driller: Brent Snyder
Krazan and Associates
Project No: 042-17005
Figure No.: A-5
Logged By: R. Alexander
At Completion: None
Penetration Test
blows/ft
20 40 60
Water Content(%)
10 20 30 40
•
•
•
•
Drill Date: 4-27-17
Hole Size: 4½ Inches
Elevation: 25 Feet
318 Sheet: 1 of 2
Log of Boring 85
Project: Convenience Store, Gas Station and Car Wash
Client: LMK Petro, Inc.

Location: 1625 S. Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA
Depth to Water>
€
:5
C.

Q)
0 0
.c
E
>-
Cl)

SUBSURFACE PROFILE
Description
Initial: None
SAMPLE
C
u
s
;:. ~ ~ 'cii
C: ~ Q) ::::,
0 U) Q)
~ ·o C.
0 2 ~
110.5 20.9
End of Borehole
26 28 -
30 32
34 36
38 -
40 ~ ~
0 cc
55 Drill Method: Solid Flight
Drill Rig: CME 45B
Driller: Brent Snyder
Krazan and Associates
Project No: 042-17005
Figure No.: A-5
Logged By: R. Alexander
At Completion: None
Penetration Test
blows/ft
Water Content(%)
20 40 60 10 20 30 40
•
Drill Date: 4-27-17
Hole Size: 4½ Inches
Elevation: 25 Feet
Sheet: 2 of 2
I
319
Pro·ect No
042-17005

0.1 -1
0 .. ...
2 3
...... ...... .... ...... ...... ·, .... ... ...

Consolidation Test
Date Soil Classification
5/22/2017 CL
10 100
% Consolidation @ 2Ksf: 0.5 %
'\
\ I.
\ 1,
\ .. ... 1 ..
...... \ -... \ ... ... ...... ....
...... "", I'-, .... , .,.

Krazan Testing Laboratory
320
Sieve Openings in Inches
3 1 -1/2 3/4 - - L
I
I
100
1/2
Gravel
Coarse
Project Name
Project Number
Soil Classification
Sample Number
I
3/8 L L
10 Grain Size Analysis
Fine
U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers
#4 #8 #16
1 I
Coarse I
#30 #50 #100 #200
I I
,_ ..... ~~
~ \.
'\
\ ~

0.1 Grain Size in Millimeters
Sand
Medium I Fine
~
-.

I
I
(Unified Soils Classification)
Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash
042-17005
CL
83@5-6'
Hydrometer
I
I
I

0.01 Silt or Clay
100.0

90.0 80.0

70.0 60.0

50.0 40.0

30.0 20.0

10.0 0.0

0.001
C)
z
U)
ti)
<(

0..

Iz
w
~ w

0..

Krazan Testing Laboratory
321
Expansion Index Test
ASTM D -4829/ UBC Std. 18-2
Project Number : 042-17005
Project Name
Date
: Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash
: 5/22/2017
Sample location/ Depth
Sample Number
Soil Classification
Trial#
Weight of Soil & Mold, gms
Weight of Mold, gms
Weight of Soil, gms
Wet Density, Lbs/cu.ft.

Weight of Moisture Sample (Wet), gms
Weight of Moisture Sample (Dry), gms
Moisture Content,%
Dry Density, Lbs/cu.ft.

Specific Gravity of Soil
Degree of Saturation,%
Time lnital 30 min
Dial Reading 0 --
: 81 @3-4'
: X1
: CL
1 hr
--
Expansion Index measured = 101
Expansion Index = 1 ___ 1_0_1 ___ 1
1 2 3
616.1
206.5
409.6
123.5
300.0
275.2

9.0 113.3

2.7 50.0
6hrs 12 hrs 24 hrs
.-- -- 0.101
Expansion Potential Table
Exp. Index Potential Exp.
0- 20 Very Low
21 - 50 Low
51 - 90 Medium
91 - 130 High
>130 Very High
Krazan Testing Laboratory 322
Expansion Index Test
ASTM D -4829/ USC Std.18-2
Project Number : 042-17005
Project Name
Date
: Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash
: 5/22/2017
Sample location/ Depth
Sample Number
Soil Classification
Trial#
Weight of Soil & Mold, gms
Weight of Mold, gms
Weight of Soil, gms
Wet Density, Lbs/cu.ft.
: 3-4'
: X2
: CL
Weight of Moisture Sample (Wet), gms
Weight of Moisture Sample (Dry}, gms
Moisture Content,%
Dry Density, Lbs/cu. ft.

Specific Gravity of Soil
Degree of Saturation, %
Time lnital 30 min
Dial Reading 0 --
Expansion Index measured =
Expansion Index = 102
1 2 3
617.8
204.4
413.4
124.7
300.0
275.5

8.9 114.5

2.7 50.9
1 hr 6hrs 12 hrs 24 hrs
-- -- -- 0.102
Expansion Potential Table
102 Exp. Index Potential Exp.
0-20 Very Low
21 - 50 Low
51 - 90 Medium
91 - 130 High
>130 Very High
Krazan Testing Laboratory 323
Plasticity Index of Soils
ASTM D4318/AASHTO T89 T90/CT 204
Project: Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash
Project Number: 042-17005
Date Sampled: 4/27/2017
Sampled By: RA
Sample Number:

Sample Location: 82 @ 25-26'
Sample Description: ML w/ trace of clay
Plastic Limit
Trial Number 1 2
Weight of Wet Soil & Tare (g)
Weight of Dry Soil & Tare (Q)
Weight of Tare (g)
Weight of water (g)
WeiQht of Dry Soil (Q)
Water Content (% of dry wt.)
Number of Blows ·,
Plastic Limit : N/D
Plasticity Index : NON-PLASTIC
Date Tested: 5/19/2017
Tested By: J Dyer
Verified By: J Gruszczynski
Liquid Limit
3 1 2
·"
Liquid Limit : N/0
Unified Soil Classification : NON-PLASTIC Requirement:

Approx. % of Material Retained on # 40 Sieve:
60 50
40 I(
Cl)
"C 30 .E
b
'i3
.. 20 II)
RI
ii:
10 0
CL
/ V ., ---, ... I
.._ ML I/ Olor ML
0 20 40
CH
/
~v
60 Liquid Limit
I Departures from Outlined Procedure:

I Unusual Conditions, Other Notes:
/
/ V
OH
or
HU
80 100

Page 7 of 8 ends

Pittsburg City CouncilOctober 2, 2023

Pittsburg City Council
October 2, 2023