Agenda — Pittsburg City Council, October 2, 2023 (part 5 of 7)

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=17]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1259] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 1
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 8 10 494 0 0 724 14
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1242
Minor Approach Volume: 17
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 162
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 965
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:09:28 2017 Page 3-9
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project A.M.

Intersection #7: Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 2
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 12 0 13
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
10 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 9

1 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 499 0 Critical V/C: 0.068 0 725
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 0 0
LOS: C

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Street Name: Project Driveway 2 Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 499 0 0 725 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 499 0 0 725 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 13 0 12 10 0 0 0 0 9
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 13 0 12 10 499 0 0 725 9
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 13 0 12 10 499 0 0 725 9
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 13 0 12 10 499 0 0 725 9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1249 1249 730 734 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 193 175 426 880 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 191 173 426 880 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 260 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 20.3 xxxxx 9.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * C * A * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 20.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * C * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 2
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
966
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:09:28 2017 Page 3-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0 13 0 12 10 499 0 0 725 9
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 20.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=25]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1268] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 2
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0 13 0 12 10 499 0 0 725 9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1243
Minor Approach Volume: 25
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 161
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 967
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:11:40 2017 Page 3-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project P.M.

Intersection #1: Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 307 0 241***
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
186 1
Cycle Time (sec): 95
1 189

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 786*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.639 1 372
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 10.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 13.0 0 0***
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Loveridge Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 0 0 8 8
Y+R: 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0
xxxxx-------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 5:00-6:00 P.M.

Base Vol: 0 0 0 235 0 307 186 773 0 0 359 183
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 235 0 307 186 773 0 0 359 183
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 6
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 241 0 307 186 786 0 0 372 189
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 263 0 335 198 836 0 0 415 211
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 263 0 335 198 836 0 0 415 211
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 211
RTOR Vol: 0 0 0 263 0 137 198 836 0 0 415 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 263 0 137 198 836 0 0 415 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1720 0 1720 1720 1720 0 0 1720 1720
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.08 0.12 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 263 836 0
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
968
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:11:40 2017 Page 3-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project P.M.

Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 8 0 23
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 1013 0 Critical V/C: 0.647 0 557
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 3.9 1
11 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 3.9 0 2
LOS: F

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Initial Vol: 6 0 2
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Street Name: Woodborough Place Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 5:00-6:00 P.M.

Base Vol: 6 0 2 23 0 8 0 994 11 2 538 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 6 0 2 23 0 8 0 994 11 2 538 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 19 0
Initial Fut: 6 0 2 23 0 8 0 1013 11 2 557 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 12 0 4 50 0 18 0 1040 11 2 602 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 12 0 4 50 0 18 0 1040 11 2 602 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1660 1652 1046 1654 1657 602 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1051 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 78 100 280 79 99 504 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 670 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 76 99 280 78 99 504 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 670 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.16 0.00 0.01 0.65 0.00 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.4 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B * * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 92 xxxxx 78 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx 3.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 52.0 xxxxx 112.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.4 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * F * F * * * * * B * *
ApproachDel: 52.0 86.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
969
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:11:40 2017 Page 3-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 6 0 2 23 0 8 0 1013 11 2 557 0
ApproachDel: 52.0 86.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=8]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1622] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.7]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=31]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 6 0 2 23 0 8 0 1013 11 2 557 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1583
Minor Approach Volume: 31
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 148 [less than minimum of 150] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 970
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:11:40 2017 Page 3-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project P.M.

Intersection #3: Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 24 37*** 46
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
12 1
Cycle Time (sec): 132
0 22

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 909*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.657 0 460
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 14.6 0
134 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 14.4 1 29***
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 84*** 13 43
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Ventura Drive Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 5:00-6:00 P.M.

Base Vol: 84 13 40 43 37 24 12 890 134 27 441 19
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 84 13 40 43 37 24 12 890 134 27 441 19
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 19 0 2 19 3
Initial Fut: 84 13 43 46 37 24 12 909 134 29 460 22
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 101 16 51 57 46 30 12 923 136 32 514 25
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 101 16 51 57 46 30 12 923 136 32 514 25
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 101 16 51 57 46 30 12 923 35 32 514 25
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 101 16 51 57 46 30 12 923 35 32 514 25
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.23 0.77 1.00 0.61 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.05 Final Sat.: 1720 399 1321 1720 1043 677 1720 1720 1720 1720 1641 79 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.54 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.31 Crit Volume: 101 75 923 32
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
971
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:11:40 2017 Page 3-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project P.M.

Intersection #4: Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 38 2*** 34
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
35 1
Cycle Time (sec): 88
0 29

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 921*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.654 0 424
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 10.4 0
49 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 9.2 1 61***
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 37*** 0 43
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Meadows Avenue Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Y+R: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.0 6.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 5:00-6:00 P.M.

Base Vol: 35 0 43 34 2 34 31 901 47 61 404 29
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 35 0 43 34 2 34 31 901 47 61 404 29
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 20 2 0 20 0
Initial Fut: 37 0 43 34 2 38 35 921 49 61 424 29
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 44 0 51 51 3 56 36 955 51 66 456 31
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 44 0 51 51 3 56 36 955 51 66 456 31
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 44 0 51 51 3 56 36 955 7 66 456 31
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 44 0 51 51 3 56 36 955 7 66 456 31
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.06 Final Sat.: 1720 0 1720 1720 86 1634 1720 1720 1720 1720 1610 110 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.56 0.00 0.04 0.28 0.28 Crit Volume: 44 59 955 66
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
972
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:11:40 2017 Page 3-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project P.M.

Intersection #5: Somersville Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 273 436*** 145
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
321*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 179
1 86

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 323 2 Critical V/C: 0.562 1 149***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 44.8 0
429 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 39.4 1 30
LOS: A

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Initial Vol: 173*** 215 12
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Somersville Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Y+R: 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 5:00-6:00 P.M.

Base Vol: 168 215 12 145 436 263 311 318 424 30 144 86
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 168 215 12 145 436 263 311 318 424 30 144 86 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 5 0 0 0 0 10 10 5 5 0 5 0
Initial Fut: 173 215 12 145 436 273 321 323 429 30 149 86 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 191 237 13 157 471 295 334 336 446 34 167 97 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 191 237 13 157 471 295 334 336 446 34 167 97 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 295 0 0 191 0 0 97
RTOR Vol: 191 237 13 157 471 0 334 336 255 34 167 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 191 237 13 157 471 0 334 336 255 34 167 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1650 3126 174 1650 3300 1650 1650 3300 1650 1650 1650 1650 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.00 0.20 0.10 0.15 0.02 0.10 0.00 Crit Volume: 191 236 334 167
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
973
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:11:40 2017 Page 3-7
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project P.M.

Intersection #6: Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 1
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 10 0 10
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
10 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 16

1 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 983 0 Critical V/C: 0.074 0 483
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.4 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 0 0
LOS: C

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Street Name: Project Driveway 1 Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 983 0 0 483 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 983 0 0 483 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 10 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 16
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 10 0 10 10 983 0 0 483 16
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 10 10 983 0 0 483 16
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 10 0 10 10 983 0 0 483 16
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1494 1494 491 499 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 137 124 582 1075 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 136 123 582 1075 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 220 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 23.0 xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * C * A * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 23.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * C * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 1
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
974
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:11:40 2017 Page 3-8
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 10 10 983 0 0 483 16
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 23.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=20]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1512] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 1
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 10 10 983 0 0 483 16
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1492
Minor Approach Volume: 20
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 113
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 975
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:11:40 2017 Page 3-9
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project P.M.

Intersection #7: Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 2
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 14 0 16
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
15 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 10

1 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 989 0 Critical V/C: 0.120 0 483
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 0 0
LOS: D

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 989 0 0 483 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 989 0 0 483 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 16 0 14 15 0 0 0 0 10
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 16 0 14 15 989 0 0 483 10
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 16 0 14 15 989 0 0 483 10
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 16 0 14 15 989 0 0 483 10
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1507 1507 488 493 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 134 122 584 1081 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 133 120 584 1081 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 208 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.5 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 25.2 xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * D * A * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 25.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * D * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 2
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
976
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:11:40 2017 Page 3-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0 16 0 14 15 989 0 0 483 10
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 25.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=30]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1527] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 2
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0 16 0 14 15 989 0 0 483 10
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1497
Minor Approach Volume: 30
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 112
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 977
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:12:47 2017 Page 3-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative (Year 2035) A.M.

Intersection #1: Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 208 0 203***
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
295*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 110
1 336

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 313 1 Critical V/C: 0.794 1 868***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 24.3 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 19.0 0 0
LOS: C

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Loveridge Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 0 0 8 8
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 203 0 208 295 313 0 0 868 336
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 203 0 208 295 313 0 0 868 336
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 203 0 208 295 313 0 0 868 336
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 203 0 208 295 313 0 0 868 336
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 203 0 208 295 313 0 0 868 336
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 0 0 203
RTOR Vol: 0 0 0 203 0 0 295 313 0 0 868 133
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 203 0 0 295 313 0 0 868 133
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 Crit Volume: 0 203 295 868
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
978
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:12:47 2017 Page 3-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative (Year 2035) A.M.

Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 4 0 5
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 506 0 Critical V/C: 0.221 0 1184
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.9 1
10 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.9 0 1
LOS: F

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Initial Vol: 16 0 5
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Street Name: Woodborough Place Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 506 10 1 1184 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 506 10 1 1184 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 506 10 1 1184 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 506 10 1 1184 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 506 10 1 1184 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1699 1697 511 1700 1702 1184 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 516 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 74 93 567 74 93 233 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1060 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 72 93 567 73 93 233 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1060 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 20.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * C * * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 91 xxxxx 73 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.8 xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 55.8 xxxxx 58.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * F * F * * * * * A * *
ApproachDel: 55.8 41.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F E * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
979
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:12:47 2017 Page 3-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 506 10 1 1184 0
ApproachDel: 55.8 41.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.3]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=21]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1731] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=9]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 506 10 1 1184 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1701
Minor Approach Volume: 21
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 78 [less than minimum of 100] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 980
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:12:47 2017 Page 3-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative (Year 2035) A.M.

Intersection #3: Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 19 11 15***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
10*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 12***

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 444 1 Critical V/C: 0.727 0 1037
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 96.0 0
73 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 18.8 1 31
LOS: C

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 156 118 59***
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Ventura Drive Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 156 118 59 15 11 19 10 444 73 31 1037 12
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 156 118 59 15 11 19 10 444 73 31 1037 12
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 156 118 59 15 11 19 10 444 73 31 1037 12
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 156 118 59 15 11 19 10 444 73 31 1037 12
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 156 118 59 15 11 19 10 444 73 31 1037 12
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 156 118 59 15 11 19 10 444 0 31 1037 12
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 156 118 59 15 11 19 10 444 0 31 1037 12
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.67 0.33 1.00 0.37 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1720 1147 573 1720 631 1089 1720 1720 1720 1720 1700 20 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.26 0.00 0.02 0.61 0.61 Crit Volume: 177 15 10 1049
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
981
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:12:47 2017 Page 3-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative (Year 2035) A.M.

Intersection #4: Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 24 4 27***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
18*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 150
0 25

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 443 1 Critical V/C: 0.659 0 1000***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 19.8 0
57 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 11.7 1 35
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 56 1*** 63
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Meadows Avenue Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Y+R: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.0 6.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 56 1 63 27 4 24 18 443 57 35 1000 25
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 56 1 63 27 4 24 18 443 57 35 1000 25
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 56 1 63 27 4 24 18 443 57 35 1000 25
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 56 1 63 27 4 24 18 443 57 35 1000 25
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 56 1 63 27 4 24 18 443 57 35 1000 25
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 56 1 63 27 4 24 18 443 1 35 1000 25
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 56 1 63 27 4 24 18 443 1 35 1000 25
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.02 0.98 1.00 0.14 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.02 Final Sat.: 1720 27 1693 1720 246 1474 1720 1720 1720 1720 1678 42 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.26 0.00 0.02 0.60 0.60 Crit Volume: 64 27 18 1025
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
982
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:12:47 2017 Page 3-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative (Year 2035) A.M.

Intersection #5: Somersville Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 148 197*** 43
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
425*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 135
1 433***

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 244 2 Critical V/C: 0.806 1 384
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 42.2 0
37 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 37.4 1 27
LOS: D

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Initial Vol: 416*** 699 58
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Somersville Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Y+R: 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 416 699 58 43 197 148 425 244 37 27 384 433
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 416 699 58 43 197 148 425 244 37 27 384 433 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 416 699 58 43 197 148 425 244 37 27 384 433 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 416 699 58 43 197 148 425 244 37 27 384 433 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 416 699 58 43 197 148 425 244 37 27 384 433 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 148 0 0 37 0 0 43
RTOR Vol: 416 699 58 43 197 0 425 244 0 27 384 390
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 416 699 58 43 197 0 425 244 0 27 384 390
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1650 3047 253 1650 3300 1650 1650 3300 1650 1650 1650 1650 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.26 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.23 0.24 Crit Volume: 416 99 425 390
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
983
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:13:41 2017 Page 3-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative (Year 2035) P.M.

Intersection #1: Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 291 0 427***
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
151 1
Cycle Time (sec): 75
1 255

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 846*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.740 1 350
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 12.3 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 12.9 0 0***
LOS: C

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Loveridge Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 0 0 8 8
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 427 0 291 151 846 0 0 350 255
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 427 0 291 151 846 0 0 350 255
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 427 0 291 151 846 0 0 350 255
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 427 0 291 151 846 0 0 350 255
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 427 0 291 151 846 0 0 350 255
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 151 0 0 0 0 0 255
RTOR Vol: 0 0 0 427 0 140 151 846 0 0 350 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 427 0 140 151 846 0 0 350 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.08 0.09 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 427 846 0
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
984
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:13:41 2017 Page 3-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative (Year 2035) P.M.

Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 10 0 28
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 1260 0 Critical V/C: 0.499 0 588
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 2.2 1
13 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 2.2 0 2
LOS: F

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Initial Vol: 7 0 2
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Street Name: Woodborough Place Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1260 13 2 588 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1260 13 2 588 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1260 13 2 588 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1260 13 2 588 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1260 13 2 588 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1864 1859 1267 1860 1865 588 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1273 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 56 74 208 57 74 513 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 552 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 55 74 208 56 73 513 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 552 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.50 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B * * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 66 xxxxx 56 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx 1.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 68.0 xxxxx 121.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.5 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * F * F * * * * * B * *
ApproachDel: 68.0 92.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
985
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:13:41 2017 Page 3-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1260 13 2 588 0
ApproachDel: 68.0 92.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=9]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1910] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=1.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=38]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1260 13 2 588 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1863
Minor Approach Volume: 38
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 97 [less than minimum of 150] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 986
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:13:41 2017 Page 3-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative (Year 2035) P.M.

Intersection #3: Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 18 104 199***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
7 1
Cycle Time (sec): 120
0 12

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 1153*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.871 0 524
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 29.1 0
147 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 24.5 1 55***
LOS: D

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 105 23*** 68
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Ventura Drive Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 105 23 68 199 104 18 7 1153 147 55 524 12
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 105 23 68 199 104 18 7 1153 147 55 524 12
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 105 23 68 199 104 18 7 1153 147 55 524 12
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 105 23 68 199 104 18 7 1153 147 55 524 12
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 105 23 68 199 104 18 7 1153 147 55 524 12
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 105 23 68 199 104 18 7 1153 42 55 524 12
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 105 23 68 199 104 18 7 1153 42 55 524 12
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.25 0.75 1.00 0.85 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.02 Final Sat.: 1720 435 1285 1720 1466 254 1720 1720 1720 1720 1681 39 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.67 0.02 0.03 0.31 0.31 Crit Volume: 91 199 1153 55
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
987
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:13:41 2017 Page 3-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative (Year 2035) P.M.

Intersection #4: Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 41 2 41***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
37 1
Cycle Time (sec): 150
0 35

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 1326*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.868 0 508
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 17.3 0
57 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 16.1 1 74***
LOS: D

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 42 0 52***
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Meadows Avenue Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Y+R: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.0 6.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 42 0 52 41 2 41 37 1326 57 74 508 35
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 42 0 52 41 2 41 37 1326 57 74 508 35
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 42 0 52 41 2 41 37 1326 57 74 508 35
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 42 0 52 41 2 41 37 1326 57 74 508 35
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 42 0 52 41 2 41 37 1326 57 74 508 35
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 42 0 52 41 2 41 37 1326 15 74 508 35
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 42 0 52 41 2 41 37 1326 15 74 508 35
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.06 Final Sat.: 1720 0 1720 1720 80 1640 1720 1720 1720 1720 1609 111 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.77 0.01 0.04 0.32 0.32 Crit Volume: 52 41 1326 74
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
988
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:13:41 2017 Page 3-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative (Year 2035) P.M.

Intersection #5: Somersville Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 408 603*** 264
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
407*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 115
1 129

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 504 2 Critical V/C: 0.737 1 247***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 33.9 0
697 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 28.8 1 54
LOS: C

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Initial Vol: 260*** 409 36
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Somersville Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Y+R: 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 260 409 36 264 603 408 407 504 697 54 247 129 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 260 409 36 264 603 408 407 504 697 54 247 129 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 260 409 36 264 603 408 407 504 697 54 247 129 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 260 409 36 264 603 408 407 504 697 54 247 129 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 260 409 36 264 603 408 407 504 697 54 247 129 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 407 0 0 260 0 0 129
RTOR Vol: 260 409 36 264 603 1 407 504 437 54 247 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 260 409 36 264 603 1 407 504 437 54 247 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.84 0.16 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1650 3033 267 1650 3300 1650 1650 3300 1650 1650 1650 1650 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.18 0.00 0.25 0.15 0.26 0.03 0.15 0.00 Crit Volume: 260 302 407 247
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
989
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:14:53 2017 Page 3-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative plus Project A.M.

Intersection #1: Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 208 0 208***
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
295*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 110
1 341

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 324 1 Critical V/C: 0.803 1 879***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 24.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 19.2 0 0
LOS: D

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Loveridge Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 0 0 8 8
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 203 0 208 295 313 0 0 868 336
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 203 0 208 295 313 0 0 868 336
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 5
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 208 0 208 295 324 0 0 879 341
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 208 0 208 295 324 0 0 879 341
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 208 0 208 295 324 0 0 879 341
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 0 0 208
RTOR Vol: 0 0 0 208 0 0 295 324 0 0 879 133
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 208 0 0 295 324 0 0 879 133
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.08 Crit Volume: 0 208 295 879
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
990
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:14:53 2017 Page 3-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative plus Project A.M.

Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 4 0 5
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 522 0 Critical V/C: 0.233 0 1200
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.9 1
10 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.9 0 1
LOS: F

Base Vol: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 506 10 1 1184 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 506 10 1 1184 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 16 0
Initial Fut: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 522 10 1 1200 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 522 10 1 1200 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 522 10 1 1200 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1731 1729 527 1732 1734 1200 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 532 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 70 89 555 70 89 228 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1046 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 69 89 555 69 89 228 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1046 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.23 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 21.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * C * * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 87 xxxxx 69 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.9 xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 59.2 xxxxx 61.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * F * F * * * * * A * *
ApproachDel: 59.2 43.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F E * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
991
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:14:53 2017 Page 3-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 522 10 1 1200 0
ApproachDel: 59.2 43.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.3]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=21]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1763] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=9]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 16 0 5 5 0 4 0 522 10 1 1200 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1733
Minor Approach Volume: 21
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 73 [less than minimum of 100] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 992
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:14:53 2017 Page 3-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative plus Project A.M.

Intersection #3: Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 19 11 17***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
10*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 14

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 460 1 Critical V/C: 0.740 0 1053***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 19.7 0
73 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 19.3 1 33
LOS: C

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 156 118 61***
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Ventura Drive Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 156 118 59 15 11 19 10 444 73 31 1037 12
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 156 118 59 15 11 19 10 444 73 31 1037 12
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 16 0 2 16 2
Initial Fut: 156 118 61 17 11 19 10 460 73 33 1053 14
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 156 118 61 17 11 19 10 460 73 33 1053 14
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 156 118 61 17 11 19 10 460 73 33 1053 14
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 156 118 61 17 11 19 10 460 0 33 1053 14
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 156 118 61 17 11 19 10 460 0 33 1053 14
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.66 0.34 1.00 0.37 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1720 1134 586 1720 631 1089 1720 1720 1720 1720 1697 23 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.02 0.62 0.62 Crit Volume: 179 17 10 1067
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
993
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:14:53 2017 Page 3-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative plus Project A.M.

Intersection #4: Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 28 4 27***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
22*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 150
0 25***

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 459 1 Critical V/C: 0.672 0 1017
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 45.0 0
59 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 12.0 1 35
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 58 1*** 63
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Meadows Avenue Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Y+R: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.0 6.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 56 1 63 27 4 24 18 443 57 35 1000 25
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 56 1 63 27 4 24 18 443 57 35 1000 25
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 16 2 0 17 0
Initial Fut: 58 1 63 27 4 28 22 459 59 35 1017 25
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 58 1 63 27 4 28 22 459 59 35 1017 25
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 58 1 63 27 4 28 22 459 59 35 1017 25
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 58 1 63 27 4 28 22 459 1 35 1017 25
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 58 1 63 27 4 28 22 459 1 35 1017 25
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.02 0.98 1.00 0.12 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.02 Final Sat.: 1720 27 1693 1720 215 1505 1720 1720 1720 1720 1679 41 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.02 0.61 0.61 Crit Volume: 64 27 22 1042
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
994
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:14:53 2017 Page 3-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative plus Project A.M.

Intersection #5: Somersville Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 157 197*** 43
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
433*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 135
1 433***

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 248 2 Critical V/C: 0.813 1 388
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 42.6 0
41 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 37.8 1 27
LOS: D

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Initial Vol: 420*** 699 58
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Somersville Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Y+R: 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 416 699 58 43 197 148 425 244 37 27 384 433
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 416 699 58 43 197 148 425 244 37 27 384 433 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 4 0 0 0 0 9 8 4 4 0 4 0
Initial Fut: 420 699 58 43 197 157 433 248 41 27 388 433 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 420 699 58 43 197 157 433 248 41 27 388 433 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 420 699 58 43 197 157 433 248 41 27 388 433 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 157 0 0 41 0 0 43
RTOR Vol: 420 699 58 43 197 0 433 248 0 27 388 390
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 420 699 58 43 197 0 433 248 0 27 388 390
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.26 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.24 0.24 Crit Volume: 420 99 433 390
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
995
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:15:43 2017 Page 3-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative plus Project P.M.

Intersection #1: Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 291 0 433***
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
151 1
Cycle Time (sec): 75
1 261

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 859*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.751 1 363
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 12.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 13.1 0 0***
LOS: C

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Loveridge Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 0 0 8 8
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 427 0 291 151 846 0 0 350 255
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 427 0 291 151 846 0 0 350 255
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 6
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 433 0 291 151 859 0 0 363 261
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 433 0 291 151 859 0 0 363 261
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 433 0 291 151 859 0 0 363 261
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 151 0 0 0 0 0 261
RTOR Vol: 0 0 0 433 0 140 151 859 0 0 363 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 433 0 140 151 859 0 0 363 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.08 0.09 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 433 859 0
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
996
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:15:43 2017 Page 3-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative plus Project P.M.

Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 10 0 28
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 1279 0 Critical V/C: 0.531 0 607
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 2.3 1
13 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 2.3 0 2
LOS: F

Base Vol: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1260 13 2 588 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1260 13 2 588 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 19 0
Initial Fut: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1279 13 2 607 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1279 13 2 607 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1279 13 2 607 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1902 1897 1286 1898 1903 607 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1292 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 53 70 203 53 70 500 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 543 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 52 70 203 53 69 500 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 543 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.53 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.7 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B * * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 62 xxxxx 53 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.5 xxxxx 2.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 72.5 xxxxx 133.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.7 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * F * F * * * * * B * *
ApproachDel: 72.5 101.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
997
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:15:43 2017 Page 3-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1279 13 2 607 0
ApproachDel: 72.5 101.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=9]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1948] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=1.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=38]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 7 0 2 28 0 10 0 1279 13 2 607 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1901
Minor Approach Volume: 38
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 90 [less than minimum of 150] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 998
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:15:43 2017 Page 3-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative plus Project P.M.

Intersection #3: Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 18 104 202***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
7 1
Cycle Time (sec): 120
0 15

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 1172*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.887 0 543
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 31.0 0
147 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 25.4 1 57***
LOS: D

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 105 23*** 71
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Ventura Drive Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 105 23 68 199 104 18 7 1153 147 55 524 12
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 105 23 68 199 104 18 7 1153 147 55 524 12
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 19 0 2 19 3
Initial Fut: 105 23 71 202 104 18 7 1172 147 57 543 15
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 105 23 71 202 104 18 7 1172 147 57 543 15
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 105 23 71 202 104 18 7 1172 147 57 543 15
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 105 23 71 202 104 18 7 1172 42 57 543 15
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 105 23 71 202 104 18 7 1172 42 57 543 15
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.24 0.76 1.00 0.85 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 1720 421 1299 1720 1466 254 1720 1720 1720 1720 1674 46 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.68 0.02 0.03 0.32 0.32 Crit Volume: 94 202 1172 57
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
999
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:15:43 2017 Page 3-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative plus Project P.M.

Intersection #4: Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 45 2*** 41
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
41 1
Cycle Time (sec): 150
0 35

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 1346*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.878 0 528
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 21.4 0
59 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 16.9 1 74***
LOS: D

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 44*** 0 52
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Meadows Avenue Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Y+R: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.0 6.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 42 0 52 41 2 41 37 1326 57 74 508 35
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 42 0 52 41 2 41 37 1326 57 74 508 35
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 20 2 0 20 0
Initial Fut: 44 0 52 41 2 45 41 1346 59 74 528 35
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 44 0 52 41 2 45 41 1346 59 74 528 35
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 44 0 52 41 2 45 41 1346 59 74 528 35
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 44 0 52 41 2 45 41 1346 15 74 528 35
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 44 0 52 41 2 45 41 1346 15 74 528 35
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.06 Final Sat.: 1720 0 1720 1720 73 1647 1720 1720 1720 1720 1613 107 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.78 0.01 0.04 0.33 0.33 Crit Volume: 44 47 1346 74
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
1000
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:15:43 2017 Page 3-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Cumulative plus Project P.M.

Intersection #5: Somersville Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 418 603*** 264
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
417*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 115
1 129

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 509 2 Critical V/C: 0.749 1 252***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 34.4 0
702 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 29.1 1 54
LOS: C

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Initial Vol: 265*** 409 36
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Somersville Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Y+R: 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 260 409 36 264 603 408 407 504 697 54 247 129 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 260 409 36 264 603 408 407 504 697 54 247 129 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 5 0 0 0 0 10 10 5 5 0 5 0
Initial Fut: 265 409 36 264 603 418 417 509 702 54 252 129 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 265 409 36 264 603 418 417 509 702 54 252 129 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 265 409 36 264 603 418 417 509 702 54 252 129 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 417 0 0 265 0 0 129
RTOR Vol: 265 409 36 264 603 1 417 509 437 54 252 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 265 409 36 264 603 1 417 509 437 54 252 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.18 0.00 0.25 0.15 0.26 0.03 0.15 0.00 Crit Volume: 265 302 417 252
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
1001

APPENDIX H

MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND REPORTING PROGRAM
1002
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program October 2022
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
– October 2022
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines require Lead Agencies to adopt a program for monitoring the mitigation measures required to avoid significant environmental impacts of a project. The Mitigation Monitoring Program ensures that mitigation measures imposed by the City are completed at the appropriate time in the development process.

The mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project are listed below along with the party responsible for implementation of the mitigation measure, the party responsible for monitoring implementation of the mitigation measure, the milestones for implementation and monitoring, and a sign off that the mitigation measure has been implemented.
1003
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project 2 Mitigation Monitoring Program October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
Biological Resources
IV(e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
IV-1. Prior to the removal of any on-site protected
tree(s), a tree removal permit application shall be
prepared consistent with Section 18.84.845 of the
City’s Municipal Code, subject to review and
approval by the City of Pittsburg Planning Division.

For all protected trees proposed for removal, the
project applicant shall comply with all tree
replacement standards or pay any in-lieu fees
pursuant to Section 18.84.855 of the Municipal
Code.

City of Pittsburg
Planning Division
Prior to the removal
of any on-site
protected tree
Cultural Resources
V(a), V(b),
V(c)
Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a
historical resource pursuant to
Section 15064.5; cause a
substantial adverse change in the
significance of a unique
archaeological resource pursuant
to Section 15064.5; or disturb any
human remains, including those
interred outside of dedicated
cemeteries?
V-1. Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, plans
shall be reviewed by the Pittsburg Community
Development Department to ensure the following
note is included:

If any prehistoric or historic artifacts, or other
indications of cultural deposits are found once
ground disturbing activities are underway, all work
within the vicinity of the find(s) shall cease, the
Community Development Department shall be
notified, and the find(s) shall be immediately
evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If the find is
determined to be a historical or unique
paleontological or archaeological resource,
contingency funding and a time allotment to allow
for implementation of avoidance measures or
appropriate mitigation shall be made available
(CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5). Work may
continue on other parts of the project site while
historical or unique archaeological resource
mitigation takes place (Public Resources Code
Sections 21083 and 21087).

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Noted prior to
approval of
Improvement Plans,
and implemented
during ground
disturbing activities
1004
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project 3 Mitigation Monitoring Program October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
V-2. Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, plans
shall be reviewed by the Pittsburg Community
Development Department to ensure the following
note is included:

In the event of the accidental discovery or
recognition of any human remains, further
excavation or disturbance of the find or any nearby
area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent
human remains shall not occur until compliance
with the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section
15064.5(e)(1) and (2) has occurred. The
Guidelines specify that in the event of the
discovery of human remains other than in a
dedicated cemetery, no further excavation at the
site or any nearby area suspected to contain
human remains shall occur until the County
Coroner has been notified to determine if an
investigation into the cause of death is required. If
the coroner determines that the remains are
Native American, then, within 24 hours, the
Coroner must notify the Native American Heritage
Commission, which in turn will notify the most
likely descendants who may recommend
treatment of the remains and any grave goods. If
the Native American Heritage Commission is
unable to identify a most likely descendant or most
likely descendant fails to make a recommendation
within 48 hours after notification by the Native
American Heritage Commission, or the landowner
or his authorized agent rejects the
recommendation by the most likely descendant
and mediation by the Native American Heritage
Commission fails to provide a measure acceptable
to the landowner, then the landowner or his
authorized representative shall rebury the human
remains and grave goods with appropriate dignity
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Noted prior to
approval of
Improvement Plans,
and implemented
during ground
disturbing activities
1005
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project 4 Mitigation Monitoring Program October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
at a location on the property not subject to further
disturbances. Should human remains be
encountered, a copy of the resulting County
Coroner report noting any written consultation with
the Native American Heritage Commission shall
be submitted as proof of compliance to the City’s
Community Development Department.

Geology and Soils
VII(c), VII(d) Be located on a geologic unit or
soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse; or be
located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct or
indirect risks to life or property?
VII-1. Prior to approval of any improvement plans, all
engineering recommendations provided in the
site-specific Geotechnical Engineering Report
Investigation prepared for the proposed project by
Krazan & Associates, Inc. shall be incorporated
into project improvement plans, prepared by a
licensed civil engineer. The recommendations
shall include, but not necessarily be limited to,
slabs on grade supported by a uniform layer of
imported non-expansive engineered fill, applicable
compaction of near surface soils, applicable
stabilization of the bottom of excavations, and site
demolition activities, which shall include removal
of all surface obstructions not intended to be
incorporated into final site design. The site
demolition activities shall also specify that
undocumented fill, and/or utility lines encountered
during demolition and construction shall be
properly removed and the resulting excavations
backfilled with imported non-expansive
engineered fill. Compliance with all
recommendations specified in the Geotechnical
Engineering Investigation shall be verified by a
licensed geotechnical engineer; and proof of
compliance shall be provided to the City Engineer
for review and approval.

City Engineer Prior to approval of
any improvement
plans
VII(f) Directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geologic feature?
VII-4. Implement Mitigation Measure V-I. See Mitigation Measure V-I
See Mitigation
Measure V-I
1006
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project 5 Mitigation Monitoring Program October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
IX(b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
likely release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
IX-1. During grading and construction activities, if
underground storage tanks (USTs) are
encountered, the applicant shall obtain a permit
from the Contra Costa County Environmental
Health Department and hire a licensed contractor
to properly remove the UST, subject to review and
approval by the Contra Costa County
Environmental Health Department. If soils
suspected of being contaminated are encountered
in association with the USTs, the soils shall be
removed in accordance with RWQCB guidelines.

Further remediation, if necessary, and disposal of
the soils shall be conducted in accordance with
State and federal guidelines, subject to verification
by the City of Pittsburg Community Development
Department.

IX-2. If indicators of apparent soil contamination (soil staining, odors, debris fill material, etc.) are
encountered at the debris pile located within the
project site, the impacted area(s) should be
isolated from surrounding, non-impacted areas.

The project environmental professional shall
obtain samples of the potentially impacted soil for
analysis of the contaminants of concern and
comparison with applicable regulatory residential
screening levels (i.e., Environmental Screening
Levels, California Human Health Screening
Levels, Regional Screening Levels, etc.). Where
the soil contaminant concentrations exceed the
applicable regulatory residential screening levels,
the impacted soil shall be excavated and disposed
of offsite at a licensed landfill facility to the
satisfaction of the City of Pittsburg Community
Development Department.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Contra Costa
County
Environmental
Health
Department
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
During grading and
construction
activities, if USTs
are encountered
If indicators of
apparent soil
contamination are
encountered at the
debris pile located
within the project
site
1007
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project 6 Mitigation Monitoring Program October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
IX-3. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit for on-site structures, the project applicant shall consult with
certified Asbestos and/or Lead Risk Assessors to
complete and submit for review to the Building
Department an asbestos and lead survey. If
asbestos-containing materials or lead-containing
materials are not discovered during the survey,
further mitigation related to asbestos-containing
materials or lead-containing materials shall not be
required. If asbestos-containing materials and/or
lead-containing materials are discovered by the
survey, the project applicant shall prepare a work
plan to demonstrate how the on-site asbestoscontaining materials and/or lead-containing materials shall be removed in accordance with
current California Occupational Health and Safety
(Cal-OSHA) Administration regulations and
disposed of in accordance with all CalEPA
regulations, prior to the demolition and/or removal
of the on-site structures. The plan shall include the
requirement that work shall be conducted by a CalOSHA registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor in accordance with Title 8 CCR 1529
and Title 8 CCR 1532.1 regarding asbestos and
lead training, engineering controls, and
certifications. The applicant shall submit the work
plan to the City of Pittsburg for review and
approval. The City has the right to defer the work
plan to the Contra Costa County Department of
Environmental Health for additional review.

Materials containing more than one (1) percent
asbestos that is friable are also subject to
BAAQMD regulations. Removal of materials
containing more than one (1) percent friable
asbestos shall be completed in accordance with
BAAQMD Section 11-2-303.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Contra Costa
County
Department of
Environmental
Health
Prior to issuance of
a demolition permit
for on-site
structures
1008
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project 7 Mitigation Monitoring Program October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
Hydrology and Water Quality
X(a), X(ci),
X(cii), X(ciii)
Violate any water quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or
ground water quality; or
substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the
alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through the
addition of impervious surfaces, in
a manner which would: result in
substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or offsite; or
create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity
of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
X-1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP). The developer shall file the Notice
of Intent (NOI) and associated fee to the SWRCB.

The SWPPP shall serve as the framework for
identification, assignment, and implementation of
BMPs. The SWPPP shall be submitted to the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer for review
and approval and shall remain on the project site
during all phases of construction. Following
implementation of the SWPPP, the contractor shall
subsequently demonstrate the SWPPP’s
effectiveness and provide for necessary and
appropriate revisions, modifications, and
improvements to reduce pollutants in stormwater
discharges to the maximum extent practicable.

The contractor shall implement BMPs to reduce
pollutants in stormwater discharges to the
maximum extent practicable.

X-2. In addition to a SWPPP, prior to issuance of
grading permits, the project applicant shall create
an interim and final erosion and sediment control
plan which shall include a delineation and brief
description of the measures to be undertaken to
retain sediment on the site, including but not
limited to, the design and specifications of berms
and sediment detention basins and a schedule for
maintenance. The plan shall also contain a
delineation and brief description of the surface
runoff and erosion control measures, including but
not limited to, types and method of applying
mulches, and designs and specifications for
diverters, dikes, and drains. The plan shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Community
Development Department.

City of Pittsburg
Director of Public
Works
City Engineer
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
1009
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project 8 Mitigation Monitoring Program October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
X-3. The project applicant shall submit a final
Stormwater Control Plan and Report compliant
with the requirements set forth in the City’s most
current NPDES permit. The C.3 treatment facilities
shall be adequately sized to treat the stormwater
runoff from the associated drainage management
areas. The grading and/or building plans shall
include drawings and specifications necessary to
implement all measures in the approved
Stormwater Control Plan. Design features shall
incorporate low impact development design
standards as outlined in the most current edition of
the Contra Costa Clean Water Program’s C.3
Guidebook. All plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the City’s Community Development
Department.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
Noise
XIII(a) Generation of a substantial
temporary or permanent increase
in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other
agencies?
XIII-1. To the maximum extent practical, as determined
by the City of Pittsburg Planning Division, the
following measures shall be implemented during
project construction:
• All noise-producing project equipment and
vehicles using internal-combustion
engines shall be equipped with
manufacturers-recommended mufflers
and be maintained in good working
condition;
• All mobile or fixed noise-producing
equipment used on the project site that
are regulated for noise output by a federal,
State, or local agency shall comply with
such regulations while in the course of
project construction;
• Electrically powered equipment shall be
used instead of pneumatic or internalCity of Pittsburg Planning Division
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Noted prior to
approval of project
grading plans, and
implemented during
project construction
1010
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project 9 Mitigation Monitoring Program October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
combustion-powered equipment, where
feasible;
• Material stockpiles and mobile equipment
staging, parking, and maintenance areas
shall be located as far as practicable from
noise-sensitive receptors;
• Project area and site access road speed
limits shall be established and enforced
during the construction period; and
• Nearby residences shall be notified of
construction schedules so that
arrangements can be made, if desired, to
limit their exposure to short-term
increases in ambient noise levels.

The above requirements shall be included via
notation on project grading plans, subject to review
and approval by the City of Pittsburg Community
Development Department.

Tribal Cultural Resources
XVIII(a),
XVIII(b)
Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public
Resources Code section 21074
as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of
the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object
with cultural value to a California
Native American Tribe, and that
is: listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section
XVIII-1. Implement Mitigation Measures V-1 and V-2. See Mitigation Measures V-1 and
V-2
See Mitigation
Measures V-1 and
V-2
1011
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project 10 Mitigation Monitoring Program October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
5020.1(k); or A resource
determined by the lead agency, in
its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1.

In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1,
the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.
1012
Resolution No. _____ Page 1 of 29 October 2, 2023

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Upholding an Appeal and Adoption )
of an Initial Study and Mitigated )
Negative Declaration for a )
General Plan Map and Zoning )
Map Amendment, as Proposed, )
and Approval of the LMK Petro Use ) RESOLUTION NO. 23-
Permit and Design Review )
Applications for an Automobile )
Service Station with an Automated )
Car Wash, and Convenience Store )
with Beer and Wine Sales for )
“LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, )
UP, DR).”_________________________)
The Pittsburg City Council DOES RESOLVE as follows:

WHEREAS, on September 15, 2016, Shashi Sharma, on behalf of LMK Petro, filed Planning Application No. 16-1189, requesting approval of: 1.) General Plan Amendment (GP) to change the site’s land use designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Community Commercial (CC); 2.) Rezone from Residential Single-Family 6,000 Square Foot (sq. ft.) Minimum Lot Size (RS-6) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN); 3.) Use Permit pursuant to CN zoning regulations to allow for the operation of a gas station with a convenience store with ABC license to sell beer and wine, and car wash, as accessory uses on the project site; and 4.) Design Review for new construction. The project has undergone several reviews by staff and was also presented to the Planning Commission at a study session on August 8, 2017; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is governed by the applicable goals and policies of the Pittsburg General Plan and the Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC); and WHEREAS, pursuant to PMC section 17.16.100, an applicant may request that two or more applications for separate discretionary approvals, including zoning amendments under Title 18 of this Code, requested, or required in conjunction with a project be consolidated; and
WHEREAS, under Government Code section 65358, the legislative body of a local government agency may amend its general plan, in whole or in part, if it finds that the amendment would be in the public interest. No more than four general plan amendments to each required element may be adopted within one calendar year. In this calendar year so far, the City Council has adopted one amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element; and
1013
Resolution No.___________ Page 2 of 29 October 2, 2023
WHEREAS, the California Government Code and Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) identify the Planning Commission as the advisory body to the City Council on amendments to the general plan. Government Code section 65353(a) requires that the Commission conduct at least one public hearing prior to making its recommendation on a proposed general plan amendment; and WHEREAS, the project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Public Resources Code 21000-21189) and the State CEQA guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000- 15387); and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the State CEQA Guidelines (Public Resources Code section 21080). Pursuant to the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared for the project. Based on the analysis in the study, the City Planner determined that potentially significant effects of the project could be lessened through specified mitigations, and subsequently, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared; and
WHEREAS, on October 24, 2022, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) was distributed to the public for a 30-day review, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15105(b). Public distribution of the NOI consisted of delivery to the County Clerk’s Office, posting on the City’s website, and on November 10, 2022, direct mailing to all interested parties and owners/occupants of the properties directly contiguous with the project, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15072; and
WHEREAS, on or prior to December 2, 2022, in accordance with Government Code section 65091 and Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) section 18.14.020, a “Notice of Public Hearing” for the December 13, 2022, public hearing on this item was posted at City Hall and at and near the project site; was delivered to the Pittsburg Library; was mailed via first class mail to the applicant and property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the project site, and to local service agencies anticipated to provide services to the business; and was mailed via first class mail or email to individuals and organizations who had previously filed written request for such notice. A copy of the notice was also placed on the “Public Notices” page of the city website on December 2, 2022. The notice was also posted on www.nextdoor.com (“Nextdoor”); and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022, the Planning Commission considered the Initial Study prepared for the project and held a public hearing on Planning Application No. AP 16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR), at which time oral and/or written testimony was considered; and
1014
Resolution No.___________ Page 3 of 29 October 2, 2023
WHEREAS, on December 22, 2022, Shashi Sharma, on behalf of LMK Petro, pursuant to PMC 18.18.969 filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s determination; and
WHEREAS, on or prior to September 22, 2023, in accordance with Government Code section 65091 and Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) section 18.14.020, a “Notice of Public Hearing” for the October 2, 2023, public hearing on this item was posted at City Hall and at and near the project site; was delivered to the Pittsburg Library; was mailed via first class mail to the applicant and property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the project site, and to local service agencies anticipated to provide services to the business; and was mailed via first class mail or email to individuals and organizations who had previously filed written request for such notice. A copy of the notice was also placed on the “Public Notices” page of the city website on September 22, 2023. The notice was also posted on www.nextdoor.com (“Nextdoor”); and
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission’s recommendation not to recommend the adoption of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for a General Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment and Use Permit and Design Review Applications for an Automobile Service Station with an Automated Car Wash, and Convenience Store with Beer and Wine Sales for, LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR).

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council finds and determines as follows:

Section 1. Recitals
The recitals set forth above are true and correct statements and are incorporated herein.

Section 2. Findings
A. Based on the City Council Staff Report dated October 2, 2023, and entitled, “Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Decision not to Recommend City Council Adoption of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for a General Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment, as Proposed, and Approval of the LMK Petro Use Permit and Design Review Applications for an Automobile Service Station with an Automated Car Wash, and Convenience Store with Alcoholic Beverage Sales for LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)”, and based on all written and oral testimony presented at the meeting, the City Council finds that:

1. The Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for this project was prepared in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.

General Plan Map Amendment
1015
Resolution No.___________ Page 4 of 29 October 2, 2023

2. The requested General Plan map amendment is in the public interest, in that it will facilitate the use of the underutilized parcel and help the City achieve its economic development objectives while reducing blight.

Use Permit for Service Station with Convenience Store and Car Wash

3. The use is in accord with the objective of the Zoning Ordinance, the purposes of the land-use district in which it is located and is appropriate to the specific location, in that the service station is a conditionally permitted use in the CC District and would provide retail of convenience items and automobile and service uses to residents in the vicinity, where such services are currently limited.

4. The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the city, provided that the business operator is required to comply with county and state permitting requirements intended to ensure safety, reduce vapor emissions from gasoline dispensing on the property, and maximize opportunities for recycling and minimization of waste diverted to landfills. The proposed use will enhance access of the immediate community by eliminating some of the longer vehicle trips (and thereby, vehicle emissions and air pollutants) associated with longer drives to gas stations located further away for refueling and purchases of convenience items.

5. The use will not adversely affect the orderly development of property within the city, but rather would offer a convenient commercial amenity in proximity to the surrounding residential communities.

6. The use will not adversely affect property values, but rather, it will increase the assessed value of the property, and thereby, property tax revenue from its development. Additionally, would introduce a small commercial component that would provide a convenience store for the immediate area and employ about 25 – 30 local people.

7. The use is consistent with the General Plan, in that service stations with convenience store uses are specifically identified as uses consistent with the Community Commercial General Plan land use designation for the site. There is no specific plan applicable to this property.

8. The use will not create a nuisance or enforcement problem, provided that alcohol sales from the site are controlled and the business operator maintains order on the premises and the overall cleanliness of the site.

9. The use will not encourage marginal development within the neighborhood, but rather has been architecturally designed and 1016
Resolution No.___________ Page 5 of 29 October 2, 2023
landscaped to visually integrate it into surroundings and the Buchanan Road corridor.

10. The use will not create a demand for public services within the city beyond that of the ability of the city to meet in the light of taxation and spending restraints, provided that alcohol sales from the site are controlled and the business operator maintains order on the premises and the overall cleanliness of the site.

11. The use is consistent with the city’s approved funding priorities in that the proposed improvements will be privately financed, and the use will generate ongoing business and sales tax revenue for the city, as residents who currently drive to service stations and stores in surrounding cities to buy gas and make other convenience purchases would have an additional alternative within city limits.

Design Review

12. The proposed structures conform with good taste, good design and will in general contribute to the character and image of the city as a place of beauty, spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality. The proposed new structures will be composed of high-quality materials and earth-tone finishes such as CMU blocks finished with stucco and reveals, stone veneer, wood brackets, clay tiles, designed to complement and blend in with the surroundings. The proposed site improvements also incorporate native, non-invasive, and drought-tolerant landscaping appropriate for the site’s location.

13. The structures will be protected against exterior and interior noise, vibrations and other factors that may tend to make the environment less desirable, in that the buildings that would be occupied by customers and employees of the business would be completely enclosed and built to current building standards.

14. The exterior design and appearance of the structures is not of inferior quality as to cause the nature of the existing neighborhood to materially depreciate in appearance and value; rather, the proposed structures have been designed so as to incorporate architectural elements that complement and visually integrate into the surroundings.

15. There are no other prominent developments in the general area at the moment, although the proposed gas station, convenience store and car wash buildings incorporate similar architectural features and building materials and colors as other structures in the vicinity. 1017
Resolution No.___________ Page 6 of 29 October 2, 2023

16. The application conforms with the criteria set forth in the city’s adopted Development Review and Design Guidelines (DRDG, Planning Commission Resolution No. 8927). More specifically, the landscaping and site layout proposed as part of this project include 15-gallon or larger sized trees and sufficiently wide landscaped planters and the majority of plants selected for the landscaping are drought-tolerant or are otherwise wellsuited to the climate of the area (DRDG sections IV.c, IV.e, IV.f, IV.g and IV.m). The buildings have also been designed to create visual connections between the service station buildings and existing development in the vicinity (DRDG sections IV.n, IV.o, IV.v and IV.x).

B. The staff report entitled “Resolution Recommending Approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Use Permit for an Automobile Service Station with Convenience Store with Beer and Wine Sales, Automated Car Wash, and Approving Design Review of Site Improvement and Architectural Plans for the Construction of a Fueling Station with Three Buildings and a Canopy, for “LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR).” dated December 13, 2022, is referenced hereto as additional support for the findings.

Section 3. Decision
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby:

A. Upholds the Appeal for Application No. AP 16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR); B. Adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program contained in Exhibits A and B of this resolution; C. Amends the General Plan, Figure 2-2 (Land Use Diagram) and Figure 2-4g (Buchanan Subarea) to change the land use designation of the properties described in section 1.A above, from a ‘Low Density Residential’ to ‘Community Commercial’ as substantially presented in Exhibit C of this resolution; D. Authorizes staff to modify other Land Use Element tables and charts as necessary to reflect the change in land use acreages and maintain internal consistency with the General Plan document;
E. Approves a Use Permit and Design Review of architectural and landscape plans, subject to the conditions as substantially presented below:

General Use Conditions

1. Conformity with Project Plans: The proposed project shall be constructed in substantial conformity with the project plans dated December 28, 2019, except as may be hereinafter modified. Any major changes to the project 1018
Resolution No.___________ Page 7 of 29 October 2, 2023
plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission at the City Planner’s discretion.

2. The approved use shall be operated substantially as presented to the City Council in the staff report identified in Section 2 above, except as may be modified by the conditions below. Operation of the approved business in a manner inconsistent with this use permit shall be grounds for revocation of the use permit.

3. Landscape Plans: The applicant shall submit a final landscape plan which identifies the total landscaped area, plant species and quantities in conformance with Pittsburg Municipal Code section 18.84.308. A minimum of 10% of the site must be landscaped.

4. Landscape Maintenance: The applicant or subsequent business owner or operator shall be responsible for maintaining landscaping in accordance with the approved landscape plan. Amendments or modifications to the approved landscape plan shall be submitted to the city planner for approval.

5. Bicycle Parking. The applicant shall maintain permanent, fixed bicycle racks or lockers for a minimum of 6 bicycles. The final design and location of any new bicycle rack(s) shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division.

6. Photometric Plan: The developer shall provide a lighting and photometric plan showing the location, type, and design of all outdoor lighting. Final location and design shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation.

7. Lighting: All lighting shall be arranged to reflect light away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. In general, lighting fixtures shall be shielded to prevent glare on adjoining properties and public rights-of-way.

8. Sign Permits: Building signage is not approved with this resolution. The applicant or business operator(s) shall submit proposed signs as part of separate sign permit applications, which shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to installation.

9. Trash Enclosure. The trash enclosure on site shall be consistent with the City of Pittsburg Trash Enclosure Design Standards and accommodate for refuse recycling and organics. The final design, materials and location of the trash enclosure shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division

10. Peace and Order: The business operators shall be responsible for maintaining the peace and order on the premises. All necessary steps 1019
Resolution No.___________ Page 8 of 29 October 2, 2023
shall be taken to ensure that the customers refrain from incidents of violence that adversely impact the safety of the community. Should the business operators fail to control loitering, noise, public disturbances or incidents of violence, and in the event that the business necessitates an increased police presence, the Chief of Police may require the business owners to provide additional public safety measures, including but not limited to, video cameras, additional exterior lighting, hiring licensed and bonded security guards approved by the Police Department, or such other measures as determined necessary by the Chief of Police. Any such required additional measures shall be at the business owner’s/operator’s sole expense.

11. Site Maintenance: The site shall be kept clean and free of all graffiti, litter, debris and refuse at all times. All landscaping on site shall be kept weed free and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition. Outdoor storage shall be prohibited.

12. EV Spaces and EVSE: At least 1 (one) Electric Vehicle (EV) spaces with rapid Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) shall be installed, consistent with Guideline IV.D.4 of the City of Pittsburg Development Review Design Guidelines (Planning Commission Resolution No. 9864).

The installed EVSE shall be ‘Level 2’, capable of charging at 30 amperes or higher at 208 or 240 volts. The appropriate permissive and regulatory signage shall be provided immediately adjacent to each EV space in accordance with California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Title 24 of the California Building Code. Compliance with this condition shall be shown on the construction drawings and improvement plans submitted for building and engineering permits. The applicant may incorporate more conduit for additional EVSE in the future.

Or
Battery switching station, and sufficient solar photovoltaic panels to fully charge a number of electric vehicles equivalent to 25% of the estimated average daily trips, should be installed.

13. Interior Noise: The building design shall implement the following measures in order to reduce interior noise impacts in compliance with State noise standards:
a. in order for windows and doors to remain closed, mechanical ventilation such as air conditioning shall be provided for all buildings; b. all windows and glass doors shall be rated STC 24 or higher such that the noise reduction provided will satisfy the interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL; and
1020
Resolution No.___________ Page 9 of 29 October 2, 2023
c. all vent ducts connecting interior spaces to the exterior (i.e., bathroom exhaust, etc.) shall have at least two 90 degree turns in the duct.

14. Utility Screening: All air conditioning units, utility boxes, transformers, backflow preventers, meters, and junction boxes shall be substantially screened from public view using a block or retaining wall screen, wood/architectural screen, or dense landscaping screen consistent with Appendix 1 of the City of Pittsburg Development Review Design Guidelines (Planning Commission Resolution No. 9864). Compliance with this condition shall be shown on the construction drawings and improvement plans submitted for building and engineering permits, and the final design shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of said permits.

15. Gutters & Downspouts: All gutters and downspouts shall be placed behind exterior walls, consistent with Guideline IV.m of the City of Pittsburg Development Review Design Guidelines (Planning Commission Resolution No. 9864). Final gutter and/or downspout placement shall be identified on the construction drawings and shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a building permit.

16. Solar Panels: The roofs of the proposed structures shall be pre-wired to create a solar-ready surface, consistent with Guideline IV.D.1 of the City of Pittsburg Development Review Design Guidelines (Planning Commission Resolution No. 9864). Wiring details shall be included on the construction drawings and shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a building permit.

17. Cool Roof: The buildings shall incorporate a cool roof for reduction of heat island effect, consistent with Guideline IV.D.1.c of the City of Pittsburg Development Review Design Guidelines. Cool roofs shall meet the minimum solar reflectance requirements discussed under CalGreen Nonresidential Voluntary Measure A5.106.11 (see 2016 California Green Building Standards Code, Part 11). Compliance with this condition shall be shown on the construction drawings submitted for building permits.

18. Site Hardscapes: At least fifty percent of all outdoor hardscapes within the project shall use light colored materials with an initial solar reflectance value of at least 30 as determined in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standards E1918 or C1549. Compliance with this condition shall be shown on the construction drawings and improvement plans submitted for building and engineering permits. 1021
Resolution No.___________ Page 10 of 29 October 2, 2023

19. Green Building Features: The project shall meet the Nonresidential Mandatory Measures specified under the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code, Part II. In addition to those measures, the project shall implement the following Nonresidential Voluntary Measures:

A5.106.5.1 Designated parking for clean air vehicles
A5.106.11.2 Cool roof for reduction of heat island effect A5.203.1 Energy efficiency. (Tier 1)
A5.303.2.3.1 Indoor water use – Tier 1 – 12-percent savings.

A5.303.4.1 Non-water supplied urinals.

A5.405.5 Cement and concrete.

A5.507.1 Lighting and thermal comfort controls.

A5.508.1.3 Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), or
A5.508.1.4 Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs).

Compliance with this condition shall be shown on the construction drawings submitted for building permits.

20. At all times during operation of the business, the business operator shall maintain a city business license, permit approval from the Contra Costa Department of Environmental Health, permit approval from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and other permits as required for the sale of food and dispensing of gasoline on the site.

21. No palettes, shipping or storage containers, drums, scrap materials, recyclable or otherwise, shall be stored outdoors on the premises, except as otherwise approved by the Planning Division.

22. The site shall be kept clean and free of all litter, debris and refuse, and all landscaping on site shall be kept weed free and maintained in a healthy condition.

23. The retail sale of tobacco and smoking paraphernalia (hookahs, mouthpieces, bongs, and pipes) is prohibited.

Use Conditions Related to Stormwater Quality

24. The business operator shall ensure that the dumpster/trash enclosure area is swept daily, and that the debris is disposed of properly.

25. The business operator shall ensure that all employees and personnel are educated about pollution prevention and Best Management Practices.

26. The business operator shall ensure that employees bag and seal food waste prior to placing it into the dumpsters.
1022
Resolution No.___________ Page 11 of 29 October 2, 2023

27. The business operator shall ensure that lids are kept closed on all tallow bins, and that they are maintained so as to avoid spillage, leaking, and/or overflowing.

28. The business operator shall have all floor drains inside the restaurant connected to the sanitary sewer.

29. The business operator shall ensure the employees use dry cleanup methods where applicable.

30. The business operator shall ensure that employees clean equipment, collect water and cleaning liquids, and dispose of water and cleaning liquids to the sanitary sewer, not to the exterior storm drain system or to any storm drain inlets/catch basins.

31. The business operator shall not allow floor mats to be cleaned or rinsed outdoors unless in a mop sink or bermed area draining to the sanitary sewer.

32. The business operator shall ensure that detergents/degreasers are never used in the process of outdoor cleaning.

33. All paved surfaces on site shall be maintained in good condition and cleaned at least once a year, between July 15 and October 15 (just prior to the rainy season). Cleaning of paved surfaces shall incorporate Best Management Practices that capture and clean the dirty water prior to discharging it to the storm drain. The business operator shall hire only mobile surface cleaners that have been trained and are recognized by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), for cleaning of the parking and paved areas.

34. Employees shall be trained on how to implement and use current Best Management Practices related to chemical storage and vehicle washing, including those activities' potential for storm water and ground pollution and how to minimize those potentials.

Use Conditions Related to Alcohol Off-Sale

35. The business operator shall obtain state Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) approval of an alcohol off-sale license, prior to the sale of any alcoholic beverages from the convenience store or storage of any alcoholic beverages on-site.

36. The facility operator shall post signage advising customers that consumption of alcoholic beverages and loitering on-site are prohibited.

The signage shall be placed in a prominent location near the main 1023
Resolution No.___________ Page 12 of 29 October 2, 2023 entrance of the building and shall be at least one square foot in size, or larger as necessary to ensure that the text of the sign is legible at a minimum distance of five feet.

37. The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around the premise.

38. Upon approval of a liquor license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), the following conditions shall be applicable:
a. Signage advertising the availability of alcohol for purchase from the store, including display of corporate logos of alcohol vendors, shall not be posted so as to be visible to any individual positioned outside of the store.
b. No alcoholic beverage sales shall occur before 9:00 a.m. and after 11:00 p.m.
c. The sale of single containers of beer or malt liquor shall be prohibited. Beer shall only be sold in manufacturer-assembled multi-packs consisting of four or more containers.
d. Fortified wine shall not be sold from the store. Wine that is sold from the store shall be limited to manufacturer standard-sized containers holding 750 or more milliliters (mL) of product. Singleserving bottles of wine or wine coolers may be sold, provided that each single-serving bottle contains at least 187 mL of alcohol and provided that they are sold in manufacturer-assembled multi-packs of four or more bottles.
e. At no time shall there be more than 25 linear feet of shelving within the store that is devoted to the sale and/or display of alcoholic beverages. The shelf area on which alcohol is displayed for purchase shall not be located within 20 feet of the customer entrance to the store.

39. Transfer of ABC License. In accordance with Business and Professions Code subsection 23800(E), and upon application for transfer of ownership of the ABC license, the Pittsburg Police Department shall reserve the right to amend the conditions of the ABC license.

40. Peace and Order. The business operator shall be responsible for maintaining the peace and order on the premises. All necessary steps shall be taken to ensure that the customers refrain from incidents of violence and/or intoxication that adversely impact the safety of the 1024
Resolution No.___________ Page 13 of 29 October 2, 2023 community. Should the business experience loitering, noise, public disturbances or incidents of violence, and in the event that the business necessitates an increased police presence, the Chief of Police may require the business operator to provide additional public safety measures, including but not limited to, video cameras, additional exterior lighting, hiring licensed and bonded security guards approved by the Police Department, or such other measures as determined necessary by the Chief of Police. Additionally, the Chief of Police at their sole discretion and for any reason may, upon 90 days’ notice, further restrict the hours of operation for the establishment for the hours of sale and sale of alcohol and distilled spirits as outlined under the applicants Type 21 ABC license.

Any such required additional measures shall be at the business operator’s sole expense.

General Design Review Conditions

41. The site improvements associated with this project shall be constructed and installed in substantial conformance with the project plans entitled, “CStore, Gas Station, Car Wash” date stamped December 28, 2019, except as modified by the conditions below.

42. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the developer shall install bicycle racks to accommodate a minimum of six bicycles on-site. The bicycle rack may be covered by a shelter. The design, color and proposed location of the racks shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to issuance of a building permit. The bicycle rack design shall conform to adopted City of Pittsburg standard details.

43. New signage is not approved at this time. No signs shall be installed until their plans have been reviewed and approved by the city under a separate sign permit application.

44. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the developer shall install minimum four-inch-high block style numbers on the building that contrast with the building façade for address identification. The numbers shall be in a color that is contrasting to the background surface to which they are adhered and shall be readily visible from the street (or in the case of shopping centers, visible from the closest parking lot aisle).

45. The trash enclosure shall be sized so as to sufficiently accommodate all of the trash, grease disposal and recycling needs of both the restaurant and convenience store uses. The dimensions of the enclosure and the enclosure access gates shall be subject to approval by the City Planning Division, the City Public Works Division, and Pittsburg Disposal Services, prior to issuance of a building permit. In order to ensure adequate access into the enlarged enclosure for Pittsburg Disposal trucks, the landscaped 1025
Resolution No.___________ Page 14 of 29 October 2, 2023 island just east of the enclosure may need to be shortened, subject to approval by the Planning Division.

46. The landing at the entry into the enclosure shall be paved with cement concrete.

47. The trash enclosure shall be constructed with at least one door or gate or secondary access measuring between three and four feet in width, in order to provide a secondary pedestrian entrance into and exit from the enclosure.

48. If required by the Contra Costa Environmental Health Department, the interior of the trash enclosure shall be constructed with hot and cold running water lines.

The enclosure shall be equipped with a floor drain that is connected to the sanitary sewer, and if a hot water connection is required inside the enclosure, then the floor drain shall be fitted with a grease interceptor or grease trap, subject to approval by the City Building Division. The developer shall demonstrate compliance with this requirement by incorporating design details in the civil plans. Said plans shall be submitted to the Development Services Department for review and approval prior to construction of the trash enclosure.

49. The trash enclosure shall be constructed with a low berm at its entrance, or its interior floor shall be sloped slightly so as to prohibit waste liquids from discharging out of the enclosure and entering a storm drain. Storm drains shall not be located within the drainage area of the enclosure.

50. Marked recycling bins for glass, aluminum and plastic containers shall be provided adjacent to each garbage can placed on the property. At a minimum, recycling bins shall be placed adjacent to the customer entrance into the convenience store; adjacent to the customer entrance into the self-service restaurant; in the outdoor seating area identified on the plans; and under the fueling station canopy at each set of four fueling stations.

51. The developer shall label all onsite storm drains with "No Dumping Drains to River" stencils or other medium and similar message approved by the Planning Division.

52. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan (which shall include drought tolerant planting around the perimeter slope), and other documentation as required by the state model water efficient landscaping ordinance or other local water efficient landscaping ordinance in effect at the time the developer 1026
Resolution No.___________ Page 15 of 29 October 2, 2023 applies for a building permit. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the developer shall complete and submit all certifications confirming that the landscaping and irrigation were installed in compliance with the approved detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, as required pursuant to the applicable ordinance in effect at the time the developer applies for a building permit.

Engineering Conditions

53. Improvement and Grading Plan Review fees. The applicant shall provide an initial payment for review of the grading and improvement plans with the first submittal. These fees are based on the engineer’s estimated costs for site improvements and grading, which shall be submitted with the plans. The improvement plan check fee is 7% of the cost of the improvements. The grading plan check fee is 2.5% of the cost for grading, or it may be based upon cubic yards of earth disturbance as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. Fifty percent (50%) of these total fees are to be paid with the initial submittal of plans and engineer’s cost estimate.

These initial payments will be credited towards the final fees as determined at engineering permit. The remainder of the fees shall be due payable prior to issuance of an engineering permit.

54. Improvement and Grading Inspection fees. The applicant shall pay the improvement and/or grading inspection fee(s) to the Engineering Division prior to the issuance of a single parcel development permit. The current improvement inspection fee is 6.75% of the engineer’s estimated cost for improvements. The grading inspection fee is 3% of the engineer’s estimated cost of grading. The grading inspection fee may also be based upon an approved engineer’s estimate of total cubic yards, according to the current schedule of grading fee charges as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule.

55. Facility Reserve Charge. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the City of Pittsburg Facilities Reserve Charge (PMC Chapters 13.08, 13.12 and 13.24) (the “FRC”) to the Engineering Division for water and sewer service in the amounts in effect at the time of building permit issuance. The applicant understands that the current FRC on file, effective August 20, 2005, shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule approved by Resolution No. 05-10290, and amended by Resolution No. 12-11778, on February 21, 2012, a copy of which is available at the City.

56. Local Traffic Mitigation Fee. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the Local Transportation Mitigation Fee (PMC Chapter

15.90) (the “LTMF”) amount in effect at the time of building permit issuance. The applicant understands that the LTMF is reviewed and 1027
Resolution No.___________ Page 16 of 29 October 2, 2023 adjusted annually to the current Construction Cost Index (CCI) and may be increased at the City Council’s discretion based on revised cost estimates for roadway and transit facilities and other factors that demonstrate an increase is needed to offset traffic impacts caused by new development. The LTMF is calculated by dividing the total fee share of improvement costs by the total number of Dwelling Unit Equivalencies (“DUE”) in the City, as described in PMC Chapter 15.90 and the Pittsburg Local Transportation Mitigation Fee Program Update, copies of which are available from the City.

57. Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the Regional Transportation-Development Impact Mitigation Fee (PMC Chapter 15.103) (the “RTDIM”) amount in effect at the time of building permit issuance. The RTDIM will be automatically increased or decreased on January 1 of each year based on the percent change in the Engineering News-Record Construction Costs Index – San Francisco Bay Area, between September 1 and September 1 of the preceding two calendar years.

58. GIS Update. Prior to the issuance of an engineering permit, the applicant shall pay the Geographic Information System (GIS) fee as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. The current fee is $119 plus $0.06/sf of parcel improvements for non-residential uses.

59. Supplemental Studies. If additional engineering studies are deemed necessary by the City Engineer, i.e., geotechnical, structural, hydraulic, etc., or expedited reviews are requested by the applicant, the applicant shall pay for all costs related to the extra work. The costs shall be paid at the time of first plan check submittal, and they may include all costs associated with the preparation of special studies, additional staff time, and/or reviews of the special studies if studies are prepared by the applicant’s engineer.

ENGINEERING SUBMITTALS:

60. Improvement Plans. The applicant shall submit electronic, pdf. files of the engineering plans to the Engineering Division for review and approval through the Accela permitting portal. The plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer, to include but not be limited to the following:
 A Site Plan
 A Grading and Drainage Plan
 A Utilities Plan
 A Landscaping and Irrigation Plan
 A Stormwater Control Plan and Report
 An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
1028
Resolution No.___________ Page 17 of 29 October 2, 2023  Offsite Improvements due to Project Impacts

61.Geotechnical Report. The applicant shall submit a current geotechnical report that supports the design features incorporated into this project including, but not limited to, grading activities, compaction requirements, utility construction, slopes, retaining walls, and roadway sections. The geotechnical report shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review prior to the approval of any civil plans and/or the issuance of a site development permit.

62.Stormwater Pollutants. The applicant shall incorporate long-term best management practices (BMP’s) for the reduction or elimination of storm water pollutants. The project design shall incorporate wherever feasible, the following long term BMPs to limit pollutant generation, discharge, and runoff.

Such source control design measures may include:
 Incorporating landscaping that minimizes irrigation and runoff, promotes surface infiltration where possible, minimizes the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and incorporates appropriate sustainable landscaping practices.  Providing covered trash, food waste, and compactor enclosures.  Using pavers for walkways and other appropriate hardscape surfaces to minimize impervious areas.
 Minimizing the amount of directly connected impervious surface area.  Marking all storm drains with “No Dumping, Drains to Delta” messages.  Constructing concrete driveway weakened plane joins at angles to assist in directing run-off to landscaped/pervious areas prior to entering the street curb and gutter.
 Plumbing of the following discharges to the sanitary sewer, subject to Delta Diablo’s authority and standards.
 Discharges from indoor floor mat/equipment/hood filter wash racks or covered outdoor wash racks for restaurant.
 Dumpster drips from covered trash and food compactor enclosures.  Discharges from outdoor covered wash areas for vehicles, equipment, and accessories.
 Fire sprinkler test water if discharge to onsite vegetated areas is not a feasible option.

63.Stormwater Pollution Protection During Construction. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan or Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (if the project requires a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board under the provisions of the General Construction Permit) to the Engineering Division for review. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan measures shall also include measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system, in 1029
Resolution No.___________ Page 18 of 29 October 2, 2023 accordance with California Stormwater Quality Association’s (CASQA’s) construction handbook.

64.Stormwater Control Plan. The applicant shall submit a complete Stormwater Control Plan and narrative report compliant with the requirements set forth in the City’s most current NPDES permit. The C.3 treatment facilities shall be adequately sized to treat the stormwater runoff from the associated drainage management areas and incorporate adequate designs to comply with current hydrograph modification requirements. The grading, improvement, and landscaping plans shall include drawings and specifications necessary to implement all measures in the Stormwater Control Plan. Design features should incorporate low impact development design standards as outlined in the most current edition of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program’s C.3 Guidebook. These features include limiting directly connected impervious area, and incorporating pervious pavements, self-retaining areas, treatment BMPs, permanent stormwater control BMPs, and other features that control stormwater flow and potential for stormwater pollutants. Grading and/ or building permits shall not be issued until this condition is met to the satisfaction of the Engineering and Planning Divisions.

65.Operations and Maintenance Plan. The applicant shall submit a Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan for the continuous maintenance of all C.3 facilities constructed to meet the C.3 requirements of the project. The final plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to the certificate of occupancy.

66.Operation and Maintenance Agreement and Right of Entry. The applicant shall execute the Operations and Maintenance Agreement and Right of Entry, which pertain to the transfer of ownership and / or long-term maintenance of stormwater treatment BMPs or hydrograph modification BMPs prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The Guidelines for the preparation of Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plans are found on the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program website (www.cccleanwater.org) or the Stormwater C.3 Guidebook, most current edition.

UTILITIES:

67.Applicant shall locate and cap the existing service line to the property and install a new service line in accordance with City standard specifications.

68.Off-Site Capacity Evaluation. The applicant shall evaluate the existing, receiving storm, sewer, and water facilities for adequate capacity and provide the results to the City to identify any service or supply problems. The cost for installation of additional facilities required to be constructed to accommodate the project shall be borne by the applicant.
1030
Resolution No.___________ Page 19 of 29 October 2, 2023

69.The applicant shall replace trees that are removed at a 1:1 ratio, with at least 15-gallon size trees. If room does not permit for the installation of these trees on site, then applicant shall coordinate the re-planting of trees at an alternate location acceptable to the City Engineer or pay an in-lieu fee of $80 per tree towards future planting of trees. Applicant shall not plant the following tree species: large oaks, pines/redwoods, or eucalyptus trees along any public sidewalk or roadway.

70.The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the US Bureau of Reclamation for the corrective grading work within their property.

71.The applicant shall provide frontage improvements, sidewalk, and driveway approach in accordance with current City standard specifications and provisions.

ENGINEERING EXACTIONS (CFD inclusion):

72.Annexation Documentation for CFD 2005-1. The applicant shall agree to annex into the Community Facilities District 2005-1, which is for public safety services. The fees collected will provide funding for an increase of police coverage in the area. The rate of the CFD 2005-1 fee is subject to City Council Resolution No. 05-10342. The applicant shall deliver written approval in a manner acceptable to the Community and Economic Development Director, that the owner of the parcel is electing to annex the subject property into the 2005-1 Public Safety Services Community Facilities District (CFD 2005-1), prior to the issuance of any building or engineering permits.

73.Annexation Documentation for CFD 2017-1. The applicant shall agree to annex into the Community Facilities District 2017-1, which is for fire facilities and fire safety and emergency services. The rate of the CFD 2017-1 fee is subject to City Council Resolution No. 17-13311. The applicant shall deliver written approval in a manner acceptable to the Community and Economic Development Director, that the owner of the parcel is electing to annex the subject property into the 21017-1 Fire Facilities and Fire Safety and Emergency Services Community Facilities District (CFD 2017-1), prior to the issuance of any building or engineering permits.

Public Works

74. The trees being removed need to be replaced at a 1:1 ratio with at least a 15-gal size. If there is not enough room on the property to replace all of the trees removed, then 15 gal trees need to be discussed with City staff and donated for planting nearby or a fund needs to be set aside so that we can plant the remaining number of trees somewhere else within the city. 1031
Resolution No.___________ Page 20 of 29 October 2, 2023 This is to keep within our Tree City USA requirements. 15 gal trees are approximately $80 each depending on the species.

75. Trees in plans need to be planted at least 4 feet from sidewalk and/or roadway. No large oaks, pines/redwoods, or eucalyptus trees should be planted along sidewalk/roadway.

CEQA Mitigation Measures

76. The project shall incorporate all the Mitigation Measures as outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting (MMRP) Program attached to the Resolution as Exhibit B and as follows:

77. Prior to the removal of any on-site protected tree(s), a tree removal permit application shall be prepared consistent with Section 18.84.845 of the City’s Municipal Code, subject to review and approval by the City of Pittsburg Planning Division. For all protected trees proposed for removal, the project applicant shall comply with all tree replacement standards or pay any in-lieu fees pursuant to Section 18.84.855 of the Municipal Code.

78. Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, plans shall be reviewed by the Pittsburg Community and Economic Development Department to ensure the following note is included: If any prehistoric or historic artifacts, or other indications of cultural deposits are found once ground disturbing activities are underway, all work within the vicinity of the find(s) shall cease, the Community Development Department shall be notified, and the find(s) shall be immediately evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If the find is determined to be a historical or unique paleontological or archaeological resource, contingency funding, and a time allotment to allow for implementation of avoidance measures or appropriate mitigation shall be made available (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5). Work may continue on other parts of the project site while historical or unique archaeological resource mitigation takes place (Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087).

79. Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, plans shall be reviewed by the Pittsburg Community and Economic Development Department to ensure the following note is included:

If the coroner determines that the remains are Native American, then, within 24 hours, the Coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which in turn will notify the most likely descendants who may recommend treatment of the remains and any grave goods. If the Native American Heritage Commission is unable to identify a most likely descendant or most likely descendant fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after notification by the Native American Heritage Commission, or the landowner or his authorized agent rejects the recommendation by the most likely descendant and mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission fails to provide a measure acceptable to the landowner, then the landowner or his authorized representative shall rebury the human remains and grave goods with appropriate dignity at a location on the property not subject to further disturbances. Should human remains be encountered, a copy of the resulting County Coroner report noting any written consultation with the Native American Heritage Commission shall be submitted as proof of compliance to the City’s Community Development Department.

80. Prior to approval of any improvement plans, all engineering recommendations provided in the site-specific Geotechnical Engineering Report Investigation prepared for the proposed project by Krazan & Associates, Inc. shall be incorporated into project improvement plans, prepared by a licensed civil engineer. The recommendations shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, slabs on grade supported by a uniform layer of imported non-expansive engineered fill, applicable compaction of near surface soils, applicable stabilization of the bottom of excavations, and site demolition activities, which shall include removal of all surface obstructions not intended to be incorporated into final site design. The site demolition activities shall also specify that undocumented fill, and/or utility lines encountered during demolition and construction shall be properly removed and the resulting excavations backfilled with imported nonexpansive engineered fill. Compliance with all recommendations specified in the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation shall be verified by a licensed geotechnical engineer; and proof of compliance shall be provided to the City Engineer for review and approval.

81. During grading and construction activities, if underground storage tanks (USTs) are encountered, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the Contra Costa County Environmental Health Department and hire a licensed contractor to properly remove the UST, subject to review and approval by the Contra Costa County Environmental Health Department. If soils suspected of being contaminated are encountered in association with the USTs, the soils shall be removed in accordance with RWQCB 1033
Resolution No.___________ Page 22 of 29 October 2, 2023 guidelines. Further remediation, if necessary, and disposal of the soils shall be conducted in accordance with State and federal guidelines, subject to verification by the City of Pittsburg Community Development Department.

82. If indicators of apparent soil contamination (soil staining, odors, debris fill material, etc.) are encountered at the debris pile located within the project site, the impacted area(s) should be isolated from surrounding, nonimpacted areas. The project environmental professional shall obtain samples of the potentially impacted soil for analysis of the contaminants of concern and comparison with applicable regulatory residential screening levels (i.e., Environmental Screening Levels, California Human Health Screening Levels, Regional Screening Levels, etc.). Where the soil contaminant concentrations exceed the applicable regulatory residential screening levels, the impacted soil shall be excavated and disposed of offsite at a licensed landfill facility to the satisfaction of the City of Pittsburg Community Development Department.

83. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit for on-site structures, the project applicant shall consult with certified Asbestos and/or Lead Risk Assessors to complete and submit for review to the Building Department an asbestos and lead survey. If asbestos-containing materials or lead-containing materials are not discovered during the survey, further mitigation related to asbestos-containing materials or lead-containing materials shall not be required. If asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-containing materials are discovered by the survey, the project applicant shall prepare a work plan to demonstrate how the on-site asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-containing materials shall be removed in accordance with current California Occupational Health and Safety (Cal-OSHA) Administration regulations and disposed of in accordance with all CalEPA regulations, prior to the demolition and/or removal of the on-site structures. The plan shall include the requirement that work shall be conducted by a Cal-OSHA registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor in accordance with Title 8 CCR 1529 and Title 8 CCR 1532.1 regarding asbestos and lead training, engineering controls, and certifications. The applicant shall submit the work plan to the City of Pittsburg for review and approval. The City has the right to defer the work plan to the Contra Costa County Department of Environmental Health for additional review. Materials containing more than one (1) percent asbestos that is friable are also subject to BAAQMD regulations. Removal of materials containing more than one (1) percent friable asbestos shall be completed in accordance with BAAQMD Section 11-2-303.

84. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The developer shall file the Notice of Intent (NOI) and associated fee to the SWRCB. The SWPPP 1034
Resolution No.___________ Page 23 of 29 October 2, 2023 shall serve as the framework for identification, assignment, and implementation of BMPs. The SWPPP shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works/City Engineer for review and approval and shall remain on the project site during all phases of construction. Following implementation of the SWPPP, the contractor shall subsequently demonstrate the SWPPP’s effectiveness and provide for necessary and appropriate revisions, modifications, and improvements to reduce pollutants in stormwater discharges to the maximum extent practicable. The contractor shall implement BMPs to reduce pollutants in stormwater discharges to the maximum extent practicable.

85. In addition to a SWPPP, prior to issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall create an interim and final erosion and sediment control plan which shall include a delineation and brief description of the measures to be undertaken to retain sediment on the site, including but not limited to, the design and specifications of berms and sediment detention basins and a schedule for maintenance. The plan shall also contain a delineation and brief description of the surface runoff and erosion control measures, including but not limited to, types and method of applying mulches, and designs and specifications for diverters, dikes, and drains. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Community Development Department.

86. The project applicant shall submit a final Stormwater Control Plan and Report compliant with the requirements set forth in the City’s most current NPDES permit. The C.3 treatment facilities shall be adequately sized to treat the stormwater runoff from the associated drainage management areas. The grading and/or building plans shall include drawings and specifications necessary to implement all measures in the approved Stormwater Control Plan. Design features shall incorporate low impact development design standards as outlined in the most current edition of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program’s C.3 Guidebook. All plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City’s Community Development Department.

87. To the maximum extent practical, as determined by the City of Pittsburg Planning Division, the following measures shall be implemented during project construction:
 All noise-producing project equipment and vehicles using internalcombustion engines shall be equipped with manufacturersrecommended mufflers and be maintained in good working condition;
 All mobile or fixed noise-producing equipment used on the project site that are regulated for noise output by a federal, State, or local 1035
Resolution No.___________ Page 24 of 29 October 2, 2023 agency shall comply with such regulations while in the course of project construction;
 Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal- combustion-powered equipment, where feasible;  Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking, and maintenance areas shall be located as far as practicable from noise-sensitive receptors;
 Project area and site access road speed limits shall be established and enforced during the construction period; and
 Nearby residences shall be notified of construction schedules so that arrangements can be made, if desired, to limit their exposure to short-term increases in ambient noise levels.

The above requirements shall be included via notation on project grading plans, subject to review and approval by the City of Pittsburg Community and Economic Development Department.

Contra Costa Health Services Hazardous Materials Programs (CCHSHMP)

88. If hazardous materials and/or hazardous waste (as defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 25501) will be on-site or generated onsite during construction activities, the responsible person(s) for these hazardous materials and/or hazardous waste shall contact CCHSHMP by calling (925) 655-3200. Depending upon the materials/waste, the quantities, and the day(s) on-site, the responsible person(s) may be required to file a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) in accordance with Chapter 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code and Title 19 of the California Code of Regulations. Permit fees may be billed to the responsible person(s).
a. Should construction activities generate hazardous waste in accordance with Chapter 11, Division 4.5, Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations, the responsible person(s) shall immediately notify CCHSHMP by calling (925) 655-3200. The responsible person(s) will be required to obtain an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identification number in order to properly dispose of hazardous waste(s).
b. Should an underground storage tank (UST) be discovered during construction activities that contains or may have previously contained a hazardous substance (as defined by Section 25281(h) of the California Health and Safety Code), the responsible person(s) shall immediately cease work in the area and contact CCHSHMP at (925) 655-3200. An UST permit to close will be required.
1036
Resolution No.___________ Page 25 of 29 October 2, 2023 c. The business must submit an UST Permit Application for new tank installation to CCHSHMP. No UST construction works shall be conducted before the business receives the approved UST Permit Application. Please contact CCHSHMP at (925) 655-3200 for more information.
d. If business that stores greater than 1,320 gallons of petroleum products (new or used) in aboveground tanks and/or containers 55 gal or more, it is required to develop and implement a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan. Legislation (AB 1130) transfers the authority for inspecting the business that requires a SPCC Plan from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to the local Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA) effective January 1, 2008. Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act (APSA), adopted in chapter 6.67 of the Health and Safety Code requires the CUPA's to ensure that businesses that are required to have a SPCC Plan are implementing that plan. Effective January 1, 2010, the local CUPA's will be charging the businesses that must implement a SPCC Plan according to the APSA, a fee as part of the annual CUPA fee. e. Once the construction project is completed, the business must submit the HMBP including Facility Information, Hazardous Materials Inventory, Site Map(s), Emergency Response and Training Plans, UST, Hazardous Waste and/or APSA submittal elements (if applicable) in the California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) within 30 days when one of the following occurs: a 100 percent or more increase in the quantity of a previously disclosed material; any handling of a previously undisclosed hazardous material; a change of business address, business ownership, or business name; or a substantial change in the handler's operations that requires modification to any portion of the business plan.

PG&E Easement

89. PG&E operates a high-voltage electric transmission line on this property within an easement. Said easement was recorded in Volume 559 at Page 461 of Contra Costa County records. PG&E’s easement prohibits the erection or construction of any buildings or other structures within the easement area. Buildings and structures, including canopies must remain completely outside of the easement area. The applicant shall address the following requests and relocate any of features identified by PG&E out of the easement area to the satisfaction of PG&E, subject to review and approval by the Zoning Administrator prior to application for building permits:
1037
Resolution No.___________ Page 26 of 29 October 2, 2023 a. PG&E requests planting only low-growing shrubs under the wire zone and only grasses within the easement area. Along the border of the transmission line right-of-way, plant only small trees no taller than 10 feet. Short term parking of movable passenger vehicles and light trucks (pickups, vans, etc.) is allowed. The lighting within these parking areas will need to be reviewed by PG&E; approval will be on a case-by-case basis. The Company requests the applicant provide lighting specifications for PG&E’s review. Heavy equipment access to PG&E facilities is to be maintained at all times.
b. Parking is to clear PG&E structures by at least 10 feet. Reservoirs, Sumps, Drainage Basins, and Ponds are prohibited within PG&E’s easements for electric transmission lines.
c. Storage of Flammable, Explosive or Corrosive Materials: There shall be no storage of fuel or combustibles and no fueling of vehicles within PG&E’s easement. No trash bins or incinerators are allowed. d. The proposed trash enclosure, bio-retention facility, propane tank, air and water dispenser are in conflict and impact the PG&E easement area.

Standard Conditions of Approval

90. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements of the Development Services Department, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, Delta Diablo Sanitation District, Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and all other applicable local, state, and federal agencies.

91. Sales Tax Payments. Any purchase, acquisition, and/or supply of goods and materials, as well as any new or replacement equipment and supplies purchased by the Applicant or its contractors, subcontractors, agents or affiliates, subject to the limitation set forth below, in connection with this Project shall be apportioned and paid to and at the applicable sales tax rate in effect for the City as administrated by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (“CDTFA”); provided, however, that Applicant shall only be required to use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure compliance with this subsection from its contractors, subcontractors, agents, or affiliates. At no point may Applicant or its contractors, subcontractors, agents, or affiliates contractually agree to waive or share sales and use taxes from this Project with any other city, county or other entity in the State of California, regardless of agreement they might have with another jurisdiction where they have offices or conduct business. The City of Pittsburg will be the sole jurisdiction of record to the transfer of title.

Applicant and its contractors, subcontractors, agents, and affiliates shall 1038
Resolution No.___________ Page 27 of 29 October 2, 2023 comply with the Sales and Use Tax Requirements (“Requirements”) set forth below and all CDTFA requirements. If the City becomes aware of modifications necessary to such Requirements, City may propose to incorporate new or revised requirements, subject to Applicant’s agreement which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.

92. Applicant, its contractors, subcontractors, agents or affiliates, and/or future project owners and/or operators, as applicable, shall adhere to the following steps in effort to maximize the City’s allocation of sales and use taxes associated with project construction and operations by taking the following steps:
 Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit or within 60 days of the effective date of this approval, whichever comes first, the developer shall register with the CDTFA and keep such registration current throughout the operational life of the project.  Apply for a Use Tax Direct Pay Permit. Upon receipt of registration, provide a copy to the City and/or their consultant for verification.  Self-accrue and pay use taxes in accordance CDFTA requirements.  Report local and district use taxes to CDFTA on applicable use tax returns.
 Applicant shall use commercially reasonable efforts to endeavor to require all contractors, subcontractors, agents, and affiliates providing building materials and fixtures, such as but not limited to, bulk lumber, concrete, structural steel, and prefabricated building components to be used in connection with the construction and development of, or incorporated into, the Project, to:
o obtain a Seller’s Permit;
o issue a resale certificate to any supplier of material that will allow it to buy property without payment of tax:
o file timely Sales and Use tax returns and report local tax on materials consumed and fixtures sold by the contractor, subcontractor, agent or affiliate based on the sole jobsite location located in the City of Pittsburg;
o elect to obtain a sub permit for the job site of any contract valued at Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) or more enabling the contractor, subcontractor, agent or affiliate to make a direct allocation of the tax based on the jobsite located in the City of Pittsburg; and
o otherwise designate the Property as the place of use of materials used in the construction of the Project in order to 1039
Resolution No.___________ Page 28 of 29 October 2, 2023 have the full local use tax portion of the sales and use tax distributed directly to the City of Pittsburg.
 Applicant shall use commercially reasonable efforts to endeavor to require and instruct each of its contractors, subcontractors, agents, and affiliates to cooperate with the City to ensure the local use tax is allocated to City of Pittsburg.
 To assist City in its efforts to ensure that the full amount of such local sales/use tax is allocated to the City, Applicant or its General Contractor shall provide City with a quarterly spreadsheet, which includes a list of all subcontractors, agents or affiliates with contracts in excess of the amount set forth above, a description of all applicable work, and the dollar value of such subcontracts or agreements. City or City’s consultant may use the information provided it to contact each contractor, subcontractor, agent or affiliate to determine which may qualify to register the jobsite for allocation of the local use tax to the City of Pittsburg.

93. Grounds for Revocation: Operation in a manner inconsistent with that described in the report, violation of a zoning regulation or condition of this resolution, existence of a public nuisance, or conviction of a federal or state law or city ordinance in connection with the operation of the use shall be grounds for revocation of the use permit (PMC section 18.28.100).

94. Standard Conditions of Development: The Standard Conditions of Development as adopted by the Pittsburg Planning Commission by Resolution No. 8931 shall apply as conditions of approval for this project as applicable. Where there is a conflict between the Standard Conditions of Development and the project-specific conditions identified in this resolution, the specific conditions of this resolution shall govern.

95. Other Agency Requirements: The applicant shall comply with all the requirements of the City’s Community Development Department, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, and all other applicable local, state, and federal agencies. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact each local, state, or federal agency for requirements that may pertain to this project.

96. Indemnification: The applicant agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and consultants from any and all administrative, legal or equitable actions or other proceedings instituted by any person challenging the validity of this project approval, subsequent project approval, or other action arising out of, or in connection with, this project approval. The parties shall cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. The parties shall use reasonable 1040
Resolution No.___________ Page 29 of 29 October 2, 2023 efforts to select mutually agreeable defense counsel but, if the parties cannot reach agreement, City may select its own legal counsel at applicant’s sole cost and expense. The applicant may select its own legal counsel to represent the applicant’s interests at the applicant’s sole cost and expense. The applicant shall pay for City's costs of defense, whether directly or by timely reimbursement to City on a monthly basis. Such costs shall include, but not be limited to, all court costs and attorneys' fees expended by City in defense of any such action or other proceeding, plus staff and City Attorney time spent responding to and defending the claim, action or proceeding.

97. Expiration of Approval: Use permit and Design Review approval will expire on October 2, 2026, unless a building permit or grading permit has been issued or a written request for extension is filed with the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and subsequently approved by the Planning Commission. The approval shall be valid for no more than six months from the date of building or grading permit issuance unless work is commenced and diligently pursued prior to the expiration of the building or grading permit. The term of the use permit approval shall be co-terminus with the design review approval for this project.

Section 4: Effective Date
This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg on the 2nd day of October 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:
__________________________
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
1041

APPENDIX H

MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND REPORTING PROGRAM
1042
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
1 October 2022
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
– October 2022
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines require Lead Agencies to adopt a program for monitoring the mitigation measures required to avoid significant environmental impacts of a project. The Mitigation Monitoring Program ensures that mitigation measures imposed by the City are completed at the appropriate time in the development process.

The mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project are listed below along with the party responsible for implementation of the mitigation measure, the party responsible for monitoring implementation of the mitigation measure, the milestones for implementation and monitoring, and a sign off that the mitigation measure has been implemented.
1043
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
2 October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
Biological Resources
IV(e) Conflict with any local policies or IV-1. Prior to the removal of any on-site protected tree(s), a tree removal permit application shall be
prepared consistent with Section 18.84.845 of the
City’s Municipal Code, subject to review and
approval by the City of Pittsburg Planning Division.

For all protected trees proposed for removal, the
project applicant shall comply with all tree
replacement standards or pay any in-lieu fees
pursuant to Section 18.84.855 of the Municipal
Code.

City of Pittsburg Prior to the removal
ordinances protecting biological Planning Division of any on-site resources, such as a tree protected tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Cultural Resources
V(a), V(b),
V(c)
Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a
historical resource pursuant to
Section 15064.5; cause a
substantial adverse change in the
significance of a unique
archaeological resource pursuant
to Section 15064.5; or disturb any
human remains, including those
interred outside of dedicated
cemeteries?
V-1. Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, plans
shall be reviewed by the Pittsburg Community
Development Department to ensure the following
note is included:

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Noted prior to
approval of
Improvement Plans,
and implemented
during ground
disturbing activities
1044
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
3 October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
V-2. Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, plans
shall be reviewed by the Pittsburg Community
Development Department to ensure the following
note is included:

In the event of the accidental discovery or
recognition of any human remains, further
excavation or disturbance of the find or any nearby
area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent
human remains shall not occur until compliance
with the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section
15064.5(e)(1) and (2) has occurred. The
Guidelines specify that in the event of the
discovery of human remains other than in a
dedicated cemetery, no further excavation at the
site or any nearby area suspected to contain
human remains shall occur until the County
Coroner has been notified to determine if an
investigation into the cause of death is required. If
the coroner determines that the remains are
Native American, then, within 24 hours, the
Coroner must notify the Native American Heritage
Commission, which in turn will notify the most
likely descendants who may recommend
treatment of the remains and any grave goods. If
the Native American Heritage Commission is
unable to identify a most likely descendant or most
likely descendant fails to make a recommendation
within 48 hours after notification by the Native
American Heritage Commission, or the landowner
or his authorized agent rejects the
recommendation by the most likely descendant
and mediation by the Native American Heritage
Commission fails to provide a measure acceptable
to the landowner, then the landowner or his
authorized representative shall rebury the human
remains and grave goods with appropriate dignity
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Noted prior to
approval of
Improvement Plans,
and implemented
during ground
disturbing activities
1045
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
4 October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
at a location on the property not subject to further
disturbances. Should human remains be
encountered, a copy of the resulting County
Coroner report noting any written consultation with
the Native American Heritage Commission shall
be submitted as proof of compliance to the City’s
Community Development Department.

City Engineer Prior to approval of
any improvement
plans
VII(f) Directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geologic feature?
VII-4. Implement Mitigation Measure V-I. See Mitigation Measure V-I
See Mitigation
Measure V-I
1046
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
5 October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
IX(b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
likely release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
IX-1. During grading and construction activities, if
underground storage tanks (USTs) are
encountered, the applicant shall obtain a permit
from the Contra Costa County Environmental
Health Department and hire a licensed contractor
to properly remove the UST, subject to review and
approval by the Contra Costa County
Environmental Health Department. If soils
suspected of being contaminated are encountered
in association with the USTs, the soils shall be
removed in accordance with RWQCB guidelines.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Contra Costa
County
Environmental
Health
Department
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
During grading and
construction
activities, if USTs
are encountered
If indicators of
apparent soil
contamination are
encountered at the
debris pile located
within the project
site
1047
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
6 October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
IX-3. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit for on-site structures, the project applicant shall consult with
certified Asbestos and/or Lead Risk Assessors to
complete and submit for review to the Building
Department an asbestos and lead survey. If
asbestos-containing materials or lead-containing
materials are not discovered during the survey,
further mitigation related to asbestos-containing
materials or lead-containing materials shall not be
required. If asbestos-containing materials and/or
lead-containing materials are discovered by the
survey, the project applicant shall prepare a work
plan to demonstrate how the on-site asbestoscontaining materials and/or lead-containing materials shall be removed in accordance with
current California Occupational Health and Safety
(Cal-OSHA) Administration regulations and
disposed of in accordance with all CalEPA
regulations, prior to the demolition and/or removal
of the on-site structures. The plan shall include the
requirement that work shall be conducted by a CalOSHA registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor in accordance with Title 8 CCR 1529
and Title 8 CCR 1532.1 regarding asbestos and
lead training, engineering controls, and
certifications. The applicant shall submit the work
plan to the City of Pittsburg for review and
approval. The City has the right to defer the work
plan to the Contra Costa County Department of
Environmental Health for additional review.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Contra Costa
County
Department of
Environmental
Health
Prior to issuance of
a demolition permit
for on-site
structures
1048
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
7 October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
Hydrology and Water Quality
X(a), X(ci),
X(cii), X(ciii)
Violate any water quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or
ground water quality; or
substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the
alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through the
addition of impervious surfaces, in
a manner which would: result in
substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or offsite; or
create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity
of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
X-1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP). The developer shall file the Notice
of Intent (NOI) and associated fee to the SWRCB.

The contractor shall implement BMPs to reduce
pollutants in stormwater discharges to the
maximum extent practicable.

City of Pittsburg
Director of Public
Works
City Engineer
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
1049
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
8 October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
X-3. The project applicant shall submit a final
Stormwater Control Plan and Report compliant
with the requirements set forth in the City’s most
current NPDES permit. The C.3 treatment facilities
shall be adequately sized to treat the stormwater
runoff from the associated drainage management
areas. The grading and/or building plans shall
include drawings and specifications necessary to
implement all measures in the approved
Stormwater Control Plan. Design features shall
incorporate low impact development design
standards as outlined in the most current edition of
the Contra Costa Clean Water Program’s C.3
Guidebook. All plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the City’s Community Development
Department.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
Noise
XIII(a) Generation of a substantial
temporary or permanent increase
in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other
agencies?
XIII-1. To the maximum extent practical, as determined
by the City of Pittsburg Planning Division, the
following measures shall be implemented during
project construction:
• All noise-producing project equipment and
vehicles using internal-combustion
engines shall be equipped with
manufacturers-recommended mufflers
and be maintained in good working
condition;
• All mobile or fixed noise-producing
equipment used on the project site that
are regulated for noise output by a federal,
State, or local agency shall comply with
such regulations while in the course of
project construction;
• Electrically powered equipment shall be
used instead of pneumatic or internalCity of Pittsburg Planning Division
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Noted prior to
approval of project
grading plans, and
implemented during
project construction
1050
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
9 October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
combustion-powered equipment, where
feasible;
• Material stockpiles and mobile equipment
staging, parking, and maintenance areas
shall be located as far as practicable from
noise-sensitive receptors;
• Project area and site access road speed
limits shall be established and enforced
during the construction period; and
• Nearby residences shall be notified of
construction schedules so that
arrangements can be made, if desired, to
limit their exposure to short-term
increases in ambient noise levels.

The above requirements shall be included via
notation on project grading plans, subject to review
and approval by the City of Pittsburg Community
Development Department.

Tribal Cultural Resources
XVIII(a),
XVIII(b)
Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public
Resources Code section 21074
as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of
the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object
with cultural value to a California
Native American Tribe, and that
is: listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section
XVIII-1. Implement Mitigation Measures V-1 and V-2. See Mitigation Measures V-1 and
V-2
See Mitigation
Measures V-1 and
V-2
1051
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Mitigation Monitoring Program
10 October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
LMK Petro Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Car Wash Project Impact
Number Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
Signoff
5020.1(k); or A resource
determined by the lead agency, in
its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1.

In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1,
the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.
1052
Exhibit C
General Plan Map Amendment
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)

Page 1 of 3 ends

Community Commercial Public/Institutional Industrial
High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Fig. 1: Existing General Plan Designation
Project Site
1053
Exhibit C
General Plan Map Amendment
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)

Page 2 of 3 ends

Community Commercial Public/Institutional Industrial
High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Fig. 2: Proposed General Plan Designation
Project Site
1054
Exhibit C
General Plan Map Amendment
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)

Page 3 of 3 ends

Fig. 2.4g: Proposed General Plan Map Amendment
1055
Ordinance No._________ Page 1 of 5 October 2, 2023

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Amending the Zoning Map to Change )
Zoning Designations from RS-6 to CC )
and adopting specific land use and ) ORDINANCE NO. 23-
development regulations for the )
“LMK Petro Project”________________ )
The City Council of the City of Pittsburg DOES ORDAIN as follows:

WHEREAS, on September 15, 2016, Shashi Sharma, on behalf of LMK Petro, filed Planning Application No. 16-1189, requesting approval of: 1) General Plan Amendment (GP) to change the site’s land use designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Community Commercial (CC); 2) Rezone from Residential Single-Family 6,000 Square Foot (sq. ft.) Minimum Lot Size (RS-6) to Community Commercial (CC); 3) Use Permit pursuant to CC zoning regulations to allow for the operation of a gas station with a convenience store with ABC license to sell beer and wine, and car wash, as accessory uses on the project site; and 4) Design Review for new construction. The project has undergone several reviews by staff and was also presented to the Planning Commission at a study session on August 8, 2017; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is governed by the applicable goals and policies of the Pittsburg General Plan and the Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC); and WHEREAS, pursuant to PMC section 17.16.100, an applicant may request that two or more applications for separate discretionary approvals, including zoning amendments under Title 18 of this Code, requested, or required in conjunction with a project be consolidated; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared for the project. Based on the analysis in the study, the City Planner determined that potentially significant effects of the project could be lessened through specified mitigations, and subsequently, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared; and
WHEREAS, on October 24, 2022, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) was distributed to the public for a 30-day review, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15105(b). Public distribution of the NOI consisted of delivery to the County Clerk’s Office, posting on the City’s website, and on November 10, 2022, direct mailing to all interested parties and owners/occupants of the properties directly contiguous with the project, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15072; and 1056
Ordinance No.___________ Page 2 of 5 October 2, 2023
WHEREAS, on or prior to December 2, 2022, in accordance with Government Code section 65091 and Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) section 18.14.020, a “Notice of Public Hearing” for the December 13, 2022, public hearing on this item was posted at City Hall and at and near the project site; was delivered to the Pittsburg Library; was mailed via first class mail to the applicant and property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the project site, and to local service agencies anticipated to provide services to the business; and was mailed via first class mail or email to individuals and organizations who had previously filed written request for such notice. A copy of the notice was also placed on the “Public Notices” page of the city website on December 2, 2022. The notice was also posted on www.nextdoor.com (“Nextdoor”); and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022, the Planning Commission considered the Initial Study prepared for the project and held a public hearing on Planning Application No. AP 16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR), at which time oral and/or written testimony was considered; and
WHEREAS, On December 13, 2022, the Planning Commission voted 4-1-1 to adopt Resolution No. 10214 and not recommend to the City Council the adoption of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for a General Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment, as proposed, and approval of the LMK Petro Use Permit and Design Review applications for an Automobile Service Station with an Automated Car Wash, and Convenience Store with alcoholic beverage sales for “LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR).”
WHEREAS, on December 22, 2022, Shashi Sharma, on behalf of LMK Petro, pursuant to PMC 18.18.969 filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s determination; and
WHEREAS, on or prior to September 22, 2023, in accordance with Government Code section 65091 and Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) section 18.14.020, a “Notice of Public Hearing” for the October 2, 2023, public hearing on this item was posted at City Hall and at and near the project site; was delivered to the Pittsburg Library; was mailed via first class mail to the applicant and property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the project site, and to local service agencies anticipated to provide services to the business; and was mailed via first class mail or email to individuals and organizations who had previously filed written request for such notice. A copy of the notice was also placed on the “Public Notices” page of the city website on September 22, 2023. The notice was also posted on www.nextdoor.com (“Nextdoor”); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with PMC section 18.48.050, before adoption of an ordinance, the City Council shall make findings that the proposed regulation or map amendment is consistent with the policies of the General Plan and notice and hearing provisions of this title; and
1057
Ordinance No.___________ Page 3 of 5 October 2, 2023
WHEREAS, documents and other materials constituting the record of the proceedings upon which the City’s decision and its findings are based, are located at the City of Pittsburg Planning Division; and
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2023, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing on the appeal by Shashi Sharma of the Planning Commission's Determination to Not Recommend for City Council Approval of the LMK Petro Project; AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR).

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council finds and determines as follows:

Section 1. Findings
A. Based on the City Council Staff Report dated October 2, 2023, and entitled, “Public Hearing on Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Decision to Not Recommend City Council Adoption of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for a General Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment, as Proposed, and Approval of the LMK Petro Use Permit and Design Review Applications for an Automobile Service Station with an Automated Car Wash, and Convenience Store with Alcoholic Beverage Sales for LMK Petro; Adoption of Three City Council Resolutions for: 1) Adoption of a Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act 2) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and 3) General Plan Amendment; and Introduction and Waive First reading of One City Council Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map for the LMK Petro Project, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)”, and based on all written and oral testimony presented at the meeting, the City Council finds that:

1. The Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for this project was prepared in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.

2. A Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program was prepared in compliance with CEQA.

Zoning Map Amendment

3. The requested zoning map amendment is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan, in that:
a. It will facilitate development on an infill site, thereby helping the City maintain a compact urban form (Goal 2-G-1).
b. It will incentivise the use of infill land and revitalize an underutilized site (Goal 2-G-6).
1058
Ordinance No.___________ Page 4 of 5 October 2, 2023
c. It will maintain views of the southern hills (2-P-70). d. It will allow development in an area where public facilities and infrastructure are already available (Policy 3-P-1).
e. It meets Goals 2-G-1, 2-G-6, 3-G-4, 3-P-1, 4-P-3, and 12-G-1, as it is an infill development located on an underutilized site, on a site that is currently served by public facilities and infrastructure, that complies will all required development standards and expected to serve communities in the Buchanan Planning Subarea.

4. Attracting more businesses to further economic development in the City directly addresses a major community need.

5. The requested zoning map amendment will be in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, in that it will facilitate improvement of an underutilized site and provide automobile servicing, cleaning and convenience sales and services to the surrounding community.

Section 2. Decision
Based on the findings and the authority set forth above, the City Council hereby:
1) Amends the Zoning Map, as referenced in Pittsburg Municipal Code, Title 18 (Zoning Ordinance) section 18.04.020, to change the zoning of the property for the LMK Petro Project from RS-6 to CC and adopting specific land use and development regulations, as substantially presented in “Exhibit D” of this ordinance.

Section 3. Severability
If any section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions.

Section 4. Publication
The ordinance shall be posted and published in accordance with the California Government Code.
1059
Ordinance No.___________ Page 5 of 5 October 2, 2023
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Pittsburg held on October 2, 2023, and was adopted and ordered published at a meeting of the City Council held on _________, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
1060
Exhibit D
Zoning Map Amendment
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)

Page 1 of 2 ends

Community Commercial Government & Quasi Public General Industrial High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Fig. 1: Existing Zoning Districts
Project Site
1061
Exhibit D
Zoning Map Amendment
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)

Page 2 of 2 ends

CC - Community Commercial GQ – Government & Quasi Public IG - General Industrial RH- High Density Residential RM - Medium Density Residential RS - Low Density Residential Fig. 2: Proposed Zoning Change
Project Site
1062

ATTACHMENT 4 – Existing Conditions Photos
1094
1095
1096
ATTACHMENT 5 – SURROUNDING LAND USES
Project Site
1097
Attachment 6: General Plan Consistency Table
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR).

General Plan Goal/Policy Analysis
Land Use Element
2-G-1: Maintain a compact urban form within the
City’s projected municipal boundary. Ensure that
hillside lands not environmentally suitable for
development are maintained as open space.

Consistent. The proposed new gas station would
be infill development surrounded by existing
public and residential land uses.
2-G-6: Maintain programs and provide incentives
for use of vacant infill land and reuse and
revitalization of underutilized sites
Consistent. The proposed new gas station would
redevelop an underutilized site.

Growth Management
3-G-4: Maintain programs and provide incentives
for use of vacant infill land and reuse and
revitalization of underutilized sites.

Consistent. The proposed new gas station would
redevelop an underutilized site.
3-P-1: Allow urban and suburban development
only in areas where public facilities and
infrastructure (police, fire, parks, water, sewer,
storm drainage, and community facilities) are
available or can be provided.

Consistent. The proposed new gas station would
be located on a site that is currently served by
public facilities and infrastructure.

Urban Design
4-P-3: As part of the development review process,
limit building heights and massing where views of
the hills from adjacent properties and public
spaces could be preserved.

Consistent. The proposed project is compliant
with the maximum building height established for
the proposed CC zoning district and would not
obscure views from any adjacent properties or
public spaces.

Noise Element
12-G-1: Protect public health and welfare by
eliminating or minimizing the effects of existing
noise problems, and by preventing increased
noise levels in the future.

Consistent. The proposed mitigation monitoring
and reporting program includes mitigation
measures to address potential impacts of noise
generated in the construction phase of the
project. With these mitigation measure in place,
noise impacts would be minimized for adjacent
properties.
1098
Attachment 7
Development Review Design Guidelines (DRDG) Table
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)
DRDG No. Meets Guideline?
IV.a: Parking areas should be screened from
view from any public right-of-way. Parking
areas should be broken up to eliminate vast
areas of parking especially along street
frontages.

Yes. The proposed project would include
landscaping along the Buchanan Road
frontage, screening parking spaces from the
public view. Parking for the project is located
along the side and rear of the proposed gas
station, and not along the street frontage.

IV.b: Provisions should be made for
permanent shopping cart corrals in retail
shopping centers.

Not applicable. The project is not intended
as a shopping center. No shopping carts
would be used.

IV.c: Existing trees on site should be
incorporated into the project site design,
unless waived by the City Planner or
Planning Commission.

Yes. The project will remove some trees but
others will remain at the site.

IV.d: Developer should elect, at least, one of
the schemes provided in Appendix #1 for
screening all utility box transformers,
backflow preventers, meters, and junction
boxes.

Conditionally. A condition of approval states
that all air conditioning units, utility boxes,
transformers, backflow preventers, meters,
and junction boxes shall be substantially
screened from public view using a block or
retaining wall screen, wood/architectural
screen, or dense landscaping screen. Final
utility screening methods shall be included on
the construction drawings and shall be
subject to review and approval by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of a
building permit.

IV.e: Projects with many buildings (greater
than three) should have a variety of building
sizes and masses.

Yes. Although three structures are proposed
for the gas station, they vary in sizes and
masses.

IV.f: Continuous horizontal roof lines should
be broken up whenever possible. An
expanse should not exceed 50 feet in length
unless architecture or size dictate a greater
expanse.

Yes. The project is designed to have
modestly scaled structures with varied
rooflines to minimize perceive bulk.

IV.g: Building entries should be designed as
a focal point. They should be designed to set
the theme or be the primary feature of the
building or commercial center.

Yes. The project’s front entry into the minimart is designed as a focal point of the building. This is accomplished by the
centering the main entrance within a
storefront system of glazing framed by stone
pediments and centered within a tower
element.
1099

Page 2 of 4 ends

IV.h: Building elevations visible from public
right-of-ways should be addressed in design
review and treated appropriately.

Yes. The proposed building has been
designed with consistent design elements,
materials, colors, along all elevations visible
from the public right-of-way.

IV.i: A free-standing structure within an
existing commercial or industrial center
should be architecturally compatible with the
center, including but not limited to materials,
colors, and architectural elements.

Not applicable. This guideline does not
apply because the project would not be
proposed as part of an existing commercial
or industrial center. All proposed structures
for the gas station are architecturally
compatible.

IV.j: All roof mounted equipment should be
screened completely from view from all
public rights-of-way. A site line study may be
necessary to determine appropriate
screening method.

Conditionally. A proposed condition of
approval would require the developer ensure
all roof-mounted equipment on the new
buildings are adequately screened from view.

IV.k: All structures including, but not limited
to, ‘tilt-up’ type structures, should have
structural reliefs and articulated entries.

Yes. The proposed buildings design include
a variety of contrasting materials with
different textures to create architectural
interest on each of the buildings. The design
articulate the walls with pilasters and break
up the roof lines to create additional
structural relief.

IV.l: Exterior fire escapes, stairs and other
appurtenances should be designed or
treated as integral parts of the building
façade.

Yes. Any stairways would be internal to the
building.

IV.m: Downspouts should be designed into
the façade of the building unless
architecturally treated.

Conditionally. A condition of approval
states, all gutters and downspouts shall be
placed behind exterior walls. Final gutter
and/or downspout placement shall be
identified on the construction drawings and
shall be subject to review and approval by
the Planning Division prior to issuance of a
building permit.

IV.n: Add murals, lattice or some other
space-frame type treatment to blank walls
visible from public view.

Yes. The carwash facility has blank wall that
are mitigated with pilasters to minimize visual
impacts. The proposed landscaping will
further provide some screening.

IV.o: Prototype or ‘theme’ architecture is
discouraged.

Yes. The project would not include ‘theme’
architecture.
1100

Page 3 of 4 ends

IV.p: New or remodeled buildings should be
designed to be compatible in design, color
and materials with adjacent development.

Yes. The proposed building designs are
eclectic with hints of Mediterranean,
Craftsman and Contemporary elements. The
building materials include stucco siding,
stone accent pilasters, and tile roofs. A
palette of earthtone colors would be applied
to exterior fines. The building design,
materials, and color scheme would be
compatible with the surroundings.

IV.q: The street-oriented elevations shall be
designed so as not to present the
appearance of a rear elevation.

Yes. The proposed buildings has been
designed with consistent design elements,
materials, colors, along all elevations visible
from the public right-of-way.

IV.r: Trash enclosures should include area
for collection of recyclables (i.e. space for
two 90-gallon containers minimum).

Conditionally. A proposed condition of
approval requires the proposed project
construct of a trash enclosure on site,
consistent with the City of Pittsburg Trash
Enclosure Design Standards.

DRDG No. Meets Guideline?
VI.D.1: Roofs should be designed to
integrate renewable energy systems and
provide a cool urban environment.

Conditionally. To satisfy this guideline, staff
recommends the Commission adopt a
condition of approval requiring installation of
cool roofs with pre-wired, solar-ready
surfaces.

VI.D.2: Urban heat island impacts should be
minimized through shading or paving
material design choices.

Conditionally. The proposed plans show
trees proposed at various locations for
screening and shading. In addition, a
landscape plan is required as a condition of
approval to provide at a minimum 10% site
coverage. Together this would help to reduce
the urban heat island effect.

VI.D.3: Hardscapes should be constructed
with permeable surfaces. Impermeable
surfaces may be used if they direct all runoff
toward an appropriate permanent infiltration
feature.

Yes. The proposed project is designed with
concrete and asphalt surfaces that will drain
to landscape swales areas to comply with C3 requirements.

VI.D.4: Design choices should incorporate or
prepare for electric vehicle charging or used
vegetable oil fueling infrastructure.

Conditionally. To satisfy this guideline, staff
recommends the Commission adopt a
condition of approval requiring installation of
electric vehicle parking spaces with full
electric vehicle supply equipment.
1101

Page 4 of 4 ends

VI.D.5: Fuel cell technology should be
considered where other renewables are
infeasible.

Not applicable. See comment under DRDG
VI.D.1.

VI.D.6: Reclaimed water should be used for
as much non-potable water uses as feasible
and practical.

Not Applicable.

VI.D.7: Large commercial and institutional
facilities that are anticipated to employ more
than 50 employees should consider providing
on-site shops and services for those
employees.

Not applicable. The proposed project does
not include a commercial or institutional use
anticipated to employ more than 50 people.

VI.D.8: Street side building faces should
encourage walking.

Yes. The project’s main entrance would be
oriented towards the gas pumps, and
pedestrian paths would lead to the mini-mart
and the sidewalk from the main entrance.

VI.D.9: Secure bicycle parking facilities
should be provided for at least 10 percent of
expected peak hour trips.

Conditional: A condition has been added to
require the project to provide bicycle racks to
accommodate up to 6 bicycles in compliance
with PMC section 18.78.045.
1102
Attachment 8: Development Standards Consistency Table
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR).

Development Regulations:

Proposed CC District Requirement: Proposed Project:

Minimum Lot Area: 5,000 sq. ft. 5 acres (217,800s.f.)
Minimum Lot Width: 50 feet 83 feet
Minimum Yards: - -
Front: 15 ft Approximately 20 ft
Side: - Approximately 8 feet
Rear (adjacent to an R or residential
PD district):
10 >10 feet
Maximum Height of Structures: 60 feet 33 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% 4.9%
Maximum FAR: 0.05
Minimum Site Landscaping: 10%
Conditioned to meet this
requirement with full
landscape plans
Required Parking (Service station &
Automobile Washing: 4 plus 1 per 500 sq.
ft.)
26 stalls 33 stalls
1103
ATTACHMENT 9

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City of Pittsburg City Council will hold a public hearing on:

Date: October 2, 2023
Time: 5:30 p.m.

Place: CITY OF PITTSBURG MARINA CENTER
340 MARINA BOULEVARD, PITTSBURG, CA 94565
Concerning the following matter:

LMK Petro: AP-16-1189 (GPA, RZ, UP, DR)
Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Decision not to Recommend City Council Adoption of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for a General Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment, as proposed, and Approval of the LMK Petro Use Permit and Design Review Applications for an Automobile Service Station with an Automated Car Wash, and Convenience Store with Alcoholic Beverage Sales.

The proposed development would require the following land use applications:
• General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the site’s land use designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Community Commercial (CC). • Rezone from Residential Single-Family 6,000 Square Foot (sq. ft.) Minimum Lot Size (RS-6) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN).
• Use Permit pursuant to CN zoning regulations to allow for the operation of a gas station with a convenience store, and car wash as accessory uses on the project site.
• Design Review for new construction of the proposed facility.

The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the State CEQA Guidelines (Public Resources Code Section 21080). Pursuant to the provisions in the State CEQA Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared for the Project.

Based on the analysis in the study, it was determined that potentially significant impacts of the project could be lessened through specified mitigations, and subsequently, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. On October 24, 2022, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) was distributed for a 30-day public review, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15105(b). Public distribution of the NOI consisted of delivery to the County Clerk’s Office, the State Clearing House, and posting at the subject site as well as on the City’s website.
1104
The minimum 30-day public review and comment period for this environmental determination which began on Monday, October 24, 2022, was extended on November 10, 2022, with direct mailings of the NOI to all interested parties and owners/occupants of the properties directly contiguous with the project with an extended Comment Deadline that closed on Monday, December 12, 2022, 8:00 a.m. in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15072.

You are invited to submit comments regarding any aspect of this matter in writing or verbally at the October 2, 2023, public hearing. If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Anyone who wishes to comment on the findings of this environmental analysis must submit these comments in writing to Maurice Brenyah-Addow, Senior Planner, via mail at 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA, by telephone at (925) 252-4261, through e-mail at [email protected], or by fax at (925) 252-4814. ___________________________________

JOHN FUNDERBURG III

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
1105

Page 1 of 6 ends

CITY OF PITTSBURG

PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT
December 13, 2022
ITEM: Resolution Recommending City Council adoption of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for a General Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment, as proposed, and approval of the LMK Petro Use Permit and Design Review applications for an Automobile Service Station with an Automated Car Wash, and Convenience Store with Beer and Wine Sales for “LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR).” ORIGINATED BY: Shashi Sharma, on behalf of LMK Petro, 1346 S. Blaney Avenue, San Jose, CA 95129
SUBJECT: This is a request for recommendation of City Council approval of a General Plan amendment, Zoning Map amendment, Use Permit and Design Review to construct a new gas station with ancillary uses including a Convenience Store, and a Car Wash on a five-acre parcel located at 1625 Buchanan Road. The gas station is proposed to have a 4,253 sq. ft. fuel canopy over a four-island gas pumps serving eight cars, a 3,850 sq. ft. convenience store with a deli and ABC license to sell beer and wine, and a 2,800 sq. ft. car wash facility. The proposed development would require the following land use applications: 1) General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the site’s land use designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Community Commercial (CC); 2) Rezone from Residential Single-Family 6,000 Square Foot (sq. ft.) Minimum Lot Size (RS-6) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN); 3) Use Permit pursuant to CN zoning regulations to allow for the operation of a gas station with a convenience store with ABC license to sell beer and wine, and car wash as accessory uses on the project site; and

4.) Design Review for new construction. An Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) to address California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements has been prepared for the proposed project and has been circulated for public review and comments. Assessor’s Parcel No. 088-030-021.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Commission: 1) review the initial study and proposed mitigated negative declaration for the project, and then: 2) adopt a Resolution recommending City Council approval of a General Plan map amendment, Zoning Map amendment, Use Permit and Design Review application.

BACKGROUND:

The project site was originally developed in 1970 as the Burgess Nursery and Garden Center, which included rezoning of the 5-acre parcel to Neighborhood Commercial. As part of the City’s 1990 Comprehensive Zoning Update the site was rezoned to its current zoning of RS-6.
1106
Planning Commission Staff Report
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)
December 13, 2022

Page 2 of 10 ends

On September 15, 2016, Shashi Sharma, on behalf of LMK Petro, filed Planning Application No. 16-1189, requesting approval of: 1) a General Plan amendment; 2) a zoning map amendment; 3) use permit to establish a convenience market and drivethrough car wash; and 4) design review to construct the new development. The project has undergone several reviews by staff and was also presented to the Planning Commission at a study session on August 8, 2017.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Existing Conditions: The project consists of a flat area along Buchanan Road with the 2 original Burgess Nursery buildings that are planned to be removed. A 50’-wide PG&E easement with high power lines crosses the project site from east to west, just north of the Burgess Nursery buildings. Immediately north of the PG&E easement, the site topography drops by approximately 20 feet into a small valley area that was previously used for landscape material storage in connection with the nursery business. The northernmost property boundary is bordered by Norine Drive and the Contra Costa Canal.

Proposed Project: Removal of two existing buildings, site grading, and construction of three new structures, consisting of a mini-mart, an automotive fueling station with canopy, and a car wash.

GENERAL PLAN/CODE COMPLIANCE:

General Plan Amendment: The project site is located in the Buchanan Planning Subarea of the General Plan and is designated Low Density Residential; however, a general plan amendment has been requested to reclassify the site as Community Commercial.

Rezoning Request: The site is currently located within the RS-6 Zoning District; however, the applicant has also requested a rezoning to the CN (Neighborhood Commercial) District.

With the new General Plan classification and zoning proposed, the development would require a use permit and design review approval prior to establishment of the use on site.

Pursuant to Pittsburg Municipal Code section 18.48.030, the Planning Commission shall include written findings to support any recommendation it makes to the City Council to amend the Zoning Ordinance.

Environmental: The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the State CEQA Guidelines (Public Resources Code section 21080).

Pursuant to the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared 1107
Planning Commission Staff Report
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)
December 13, 2022

Page 3 of 10 ends

for the Project. Based on the analysis in the study, the Planning Manager determined that potentially significant effects of the project could be lessened through specified mitigations, and subsequently, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared. On October 24, 2022, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) was distributed to the public for a 30-day review, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15105(b). Public distribution of the NOI consisted of delivery to the County Clerk’s Office, posting on the City’s website, and (also on November 10, 2022) direct mailing to all interested parties and owners/occupants of the properties directly contiguous with the Project, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15072.

Required Findings – General Plan Map Amendment: Under Government Code section 65358, the legislative body (City Council) of a local government agency may amend its general plan, in whole or in part, if it finds that the amendment would be in the public interest. No more than four general plan amendments to each required element may be adopted within one calendar year. For calendar year 2022, the City Council has adopted one amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element.

California Government Code and Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) identify the Planning Commission as the advisory body to the City Council on amendments to the general plan. Government Code section 65353(a) requires that the Commission conduct at least one public hearing prior to making its recommendation on a proposed general plan amendment.

Required Findings – Zoning Map Amendment: PMC section 18.16.020 identifies the Planning Commission as the advisory body to the City Council on proposed changes to the zoning map, and PMC 18.48.030 requires that the Commission determine, prior to making its recommendation, whether or not:

A. the change proposed is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and applicable specific plan; B. a community need is demonstrated for the change proposed; and C. its adoption would be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice.

Required Findings - Use Permit: In accordance with PMC section 18.16.040, a use permit may be granted only if the Planning Commission can make findings that the proposed use:

A. is in accord with the objective of the Zoning Ordinance, the purposes of the land use district in which it is located and is appropriate to the specific location; 1108
Planning Commission Staff Report
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)
December 13, 2022

Page 4 of 10 ends

B. is not detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the City; C. will not adversely affect the orderly development of property within the City; D. will not adversely affect the preservation of property values and the protection of the tax base and other substantial revenue sources within the City; E. is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the general plan and applicable specific plan; F. will not create a nuisance or enforcement problem within the neighborhood; G. will not encourage marginal development within the neighborhood; H. will not create a demand for public services within the City beyond that of the ability of the City to meet in light of taxation and spending restraints imposed by law; and
I. is consistent with the City’s approved funding priorities.

Required Findings – Design Review: In order to recommend design review approval to the City Council (pursuant to the direction of PMC 18.36.230), the Commission must determine, in accordance with PMC section 18.36.220.B, that:

A. the structure conforms with good taste, good design and in general contributes to the character and image of the City as a place of beauty, spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality;
B. the structure would be protected against exterior and interior noise, vibrations and other factors that may tend to make the environment less desirable; C. the exterior design and appearance of the structure is not of inferior quality as to cause the nature of the neighborhood to materially depreciate in appearance and value;
D. the structure is in harmony with proposed developments on land in the general area; and
E. the application conforms with the criteria set forth in any applicable City adopted Design Guidelines.

Public Notice: On or prior to December 2, 2022 (and also on November 10, 2022), in accordance with Government Code sections 65090 and 65091, and PMC section 1109
Planning Commission Staff Report
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)
December 13, 2022

Page 5 of 10 ends

18.14.020, a “Notice of Public Hearing,” for the December 13, 2022, public hearing on this item was posted at City Hall; and was mailed via first class or electronic mail to the applicant, to the property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the proposed project site, to local service agencies whose services might be affected by this project, and to individuals who had previously filed written request for such notice. On November 21, 2022, the notice was published in the East County Times; The notice was also posted on www.nextdoor.com (“Nextdoor”) and was sent directly to all subscribed residents in the “Diamond Hillside”, “Los Medanos”, “Mosic Apartments” and the “Ventura” neighborhoods.

ANALYSIS:

To recommend approval of a General Plan amendment, the Planning Commission must find that the amendment proposed would be in the public interest. Staff believes this finding can be made because the proposed land use change would facilitate the adaptive reuse of an existing underutilized parcel, to provide for an automotive service station and other related convenience services to the local community. The amendment will also aid the City in achieving its economic development objectives, by enhancing the assessed value of the land and bringing in new businesses to increase sales tax and business tax revenue for the City.

To recommend approval of a zoning change, the Planning Commission must find that the amendment proposed is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan; The proposed project would be consistent with General Plan Land Use Element Goals 2-G-1, 2-G-6, 3-G-4, 3-P-1, 4-P-3, and 12- G-1, as it is an infill development located on an underutilized site, on a site that is currently served by public facilities and infrastructure, that complies will all required development standards and expected to serve communities in the Buchanan Planning Subarea. Staff believes the proposed amendment would be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan.

To recommend approval of a zoning change the Planning Commission must find that a community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. Attracting more businesses to further economic development in the City directly addresses a major community need for jobs and services. The project intends to hire 25 to 30 employees from the community. The surrounding community is mostly residential with the closest gas station about 1.2 miles from the subject site. Therefore, the proposed automotive and convenience services at the subject site will serve the needs of the surrounding community.

Also to recommend approval of the zoning change, the Planning Commission must find that its adoption would be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. The proposed project would provide a public convenience and necessity for the surrounding residents in the form of easier access to automobile 1110
Planning Commission Staff Report
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)
December 13, 2022

Page 6 of 10 ends

refueling and cleaning services and retail for convenience items which would result in their general welfare.

The project complies with all Use Permit and Design Review findings. Redevelopment and related improvements include a 4,260 square-foot new fuel canopy to accommodate 4 dispensing islands and 8 cars at a time, a 3,850 square-foot new convenience store with ABC 21 license for beer and wine; a 2,800 square-foot new car wash facility, and associated infrastructure and site improvements of the underutilized site would also enhance the appearance of neighborhood, improve property values, and attract additional investment in the area.

The new establishment is planned to operate 24-hours a day (Sunday through Saturday), with 25 to 30 employees and anticipated to generate 60 to 100 customers throughout the day. Security cameras will be mounted at both interior and exterior points and on designated hooded light poles throughout the premises. The gas canopy will have 4 total dispensing islands to accommodate 8 vehicles at a time. There will be three on-site access driveways 21 Standard and 2 Accessible parking spaces. Outdoor Lighting will include hooded parking light(s) to minimize glare and exterior building wall sconces(s) and/or wall-packet mounted LED light(s).

Of the 26 parking stalls required for the project, at least 1 (one) Electric Vehicle (EV) spaces with Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) shall be required to be installed, consistent with Guideline IV.D.4 of the City of Pittsburg Development Review Design Guidelines (Planning Commission Resolution No. 9864). The installed EVSE shall be ‘Level 2’, capable of charging at 30 amperes or higher at 208 or 240 volts. The appropriate permissive and regulatory signage shall be required to be provided immediately adjacent to each EV space in accordance with California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Title 24 of the California Building Code.

Alternatively, a battery switching station, and sufficient solar photovoltaic panels to fully charge a number of electric vehicles equivalent to 25% of the estimated average daily trips, should be installed.

The site will have a trash enclosure planned for 3-4 trash pick-ups per week. One monument sign facility is planned for the site but will be submitted for review under a separate permit application. The new landscaping along the Buchanan Road frontage would enhance the appearance of the site and help soften the visual impact of any grading at the site.

CEQA Analysis: The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the State CEQA Guidelines (Public Resources Code section 21080). Pursuant to the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared for the Project and based on the analysis in the study, the Planning Manager determined that potentially significant effects of the project could be lessened through 1111
Planning Commission Staff Report
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)
December 13, 2022

Page 7 of 10 ends

specified mitigations, and subsequently, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared.

The following is a summary of the potential environmental impacts identified in the initial study and the Mitigation Measures proposed to address those impacts:

An Arborist Report was prepared to evaluate the health and structural condition of the trees within the project area to determine which trees could be preserved and removed, and provide guidelines for tree preservation during the design, construction, and maintenance phases of development. The Arborist Report concluded that 17 trees would require removal during development of the proposed project, including all 10 protected trees identified on-site. However, five of the 10 protected trees were determined to require removal due to poor health, structure, and/or form, and, therefore, were not suitable for preservation. A mitigation measure requiring that prior to the removal of any on-site protected tree(s), a tree removal permit application shall be prepared consistent with Section 18.84.845 of the City’s Municipal Code, subject to review and approval by the City of Pittsburg Planning Division has been proposed for the project. Further, all protected trees proposed for removal, shall comply with all tree replacement standards or payment of in-lieu fees pursuant to Section 18.84.855 of the Municipal Code.

Cultural and Historical Resources: The proposed project would include demolition of the existing on-site structures, which were constructed in 1970. The Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) has determined that structures in excess of 45 years of age could be important historical resources, and former building and structure locations could be important archaeological sites; however, the onsite structures are not associated with any important events or people who would have contributed to local, California, or United States history. Therefore, the structures are not eligible for Criterion 1 or Criterion 2 of the California Register. The structures are of simple design and do not embody distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; therefore, the structures are not eligible for Criterion 3 of the California Register.

Criterion 4 is typically utilized for determining the importance of archaeological sites; therefore, the on-site structures would be ineligible for such a classification under Criterion 4. Furthermore, a records search by the NAHC of the Sacred Lands File resulted in negative findings of cultural resources on the project site.

However, considering that unknown archaeological resources, including human remains, and/or historic resources have the potential to exist on-site, ground-disturbing activity related to project construction could encounter such resources. Therefore, the proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic or archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 and/or disturb human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries during construction.
1112
Planning Commission Staff Report
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)
December 13, 2022

Page 8 of 10 ends

Thus, impacts could be considered potentially significant and as a mitigation, prior to approval of Improvement Plans, plans shall be reviewed by the Pittsburg Community Development Department to ensure if any prehistoric or historic artifacts, or other indications of cultural deposits are found once ground disturbing activities are underway, all work within the vicinity of the find(s) shall cease, the Community Development Department shall be notified, and the find(s) shall be immediately evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If the find is determined to be a historical or unique paleontological or archaeological resource, contingency funding and a time allotment to allow for implementation of avoidance measures or appropriate mitigation shall be made available (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5). Work may continue on other parts of the project site while historical or unique archaeological resource mitigation takes place (Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087).

Also, the mitigation measures direct that in the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, further excavation or disturbance of the find or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains shall not occur until compliance with the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e)(1) and (2) has occurred. The Guidelines specify that in the event of the discovery of human remains other than in a dedicated cemetery, no further excavation at the site or any nearby area suspected to contain human remains shall occur until the County Coroner has been notified to determine if an investigation into the cause of death is required. If the coroner determines that the remains are Native American, then, within 24 hours, the Coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which in turn will notify the most likely descendants who may recommend treatment of the remains and any grave goods. If the Native American Heritage Commission is unable to identify a most likely descendant or most likely descendant fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after notification by the Native American Heritage Commission, or the landowner or his authorized agent rejects the recommendation by the most likely descendant and mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission fails to provide a measure acceptable to the landowner, then the landowner or his authorized representative shall rebury the human remains and grave goods with appropriate dignity at a location on the property not subject to further disturbances. Should human remains be encountered, a copy of the resulting County Coroner report noting any written consultation with the Native American Heritage Commission shall be submitted as proof of compliance to the City’s Community Development Department.

Tribal Cultural Resource: A search of the NAHC Sacred Lands File did not yield any information regarding the presence of Tribal Cultural Resources within the project site or the immediate area. In compliance with AB 52 (Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1), project notification letters were distributed to the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista, Confederated Villages of Lisjan, Guidiville Indian Rancheria, Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan, Muwekma Ohlo North Valley Yokuts Tribene Indian Tribe of the San Francisco Bay Area, Ohlone Indian Tribe, and Wilton Rancheria on May 12, 2021. On May 26, 2021, the Confederated Villages of 1113
Planning Commission Staff Report
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)
December 13, 2022

Page 9 of 10 ends

Lisjan requested the NWIC cultural resource records search results and NAHC Sacred Lands File results, which were provided to the Tribe. Requests to consult were not received within the required response period. Based on the location and lack of identified cultural resources at the site, known Tribal Cultural Resources do not exist within the project site. Nevertheless, the possibility exists that construction of the proposed project could result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource if previously unknown cultural resources are uncovered during grading or other ground-disturbing activities. Thus, a potentially significant impact to tribal cultural resources could occur.

The same Mitigation Measure(s) Implementation for Cultural Resources above would reduce the above impact to a less-than-significant level.

Noise: Based on the operation of the proposed project it was determined that it would not result in the generation of a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code. However, given the noise levels generated by standard construction equipment, the proposed project could result in a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code during project construction.

Thus, a potentially significant impact could occur.

Implementation of the following mitigation measures would reduce the above potential impact to a less-than-significant level. To the maximum extent practical, as determined by the City of Pittsburg Planning Division, the following measures shall be implemented during project construction:
 All noise-producing project equipment and vehicles using internal-combustion engines shall be equipped with manufacturers-recommended mufflers and be maintained in good working condition;
 All mobile or fixed noise-producing equipment used on the project site that are regulated for noise output by a federal, State, or local agency shall comply with such regulations while in the course of project construction;  Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internalcombustion-powered equipment, where feasible;  Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking, and maintenance areas shall be located as far as practicable from noise-sensitive receptors;  Project area and site access road speed limits shall be established and enforced during the construction period; and
 Nearby residences shall be notified of construction schedules so that arrangements can be made, if desired, to limit their exposure to short-term increases in ambient noise levels.
1114
Planning Commission Staff Report
LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR)
December 13, 2022

Page 10 of 10 ends

The above requirements shall be included via notation on project grading plans, subject to review and approval by the City of Pittsburg Community Development Department As described in the IS/MND, the proposed project would comply with all applicable General Plan policies, Municipal Code standards, other applicable local and State regulations, in addition to the mitigation measures included herein. Therefore, with mitigation incorporated, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact.

Development Review Design Guidelines (DRDG): The City’s DRDG provide additional framework for the Design Review of development projects. These Guidelines were adopted on November 9, 2010, with Planning Commission Resolution Number 9864. As shown in Attachment 6 of this Report, the proposed project complies or conditionally complies with the City’s DRDGs.

ACTION REQUIRED:

Move to adopt a Resolution recommending City Council adoption of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for a General Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment, as proposed, and approval of the LMK Petro Use Permit and Design Review applications for an Automobile Service Station with an Automated Car Wash, Convenience Store with Beer and Wine Sales subject to the proposed Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring Program.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Proposed Resolution
a. Exhibit A – Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration b. Exhibit B – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program c. Exhibit C – General Plan Map Amendment
d. Exhibit D – Zoning Map Amendment

2. Project Plans

3. Existing Conditions Photos

4. Map of Surrounding Land Uses

5. General Plan Consistency Table

6. DRDG Consistency Table

7. Development Standard Consistency Table

8. Notice of Public Hearing/Vicinity Map
Prepared by: Maurice Brenyah-Addow, Senior Planner
1115

Page 1 of 21 ends

BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG In the Matter of:

Resolution not recommending City Council
Adoption of an Initial Study and Mitigated
Negative Declaration for a General Plan
Map and Zoning Map Amendment, as
Proposed, and City Council Approval of the
LMK Petro Use Permit and Design Review
Applications for an Automobile Service
Station with an Automated Car Wash, and
Convenience Store with Alcoholic
Beverage Sales for “LMK Petro, AP-16-
1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR).”
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Resolution No. 10214
The Planning Commission DOES RESOLVE as follows:

Section 1. Background
A. On September 15, 2016, Shashi Sharma, on behalf of LMK Petro, filed Planning Application No. 16-1189, requesting approval of: 1.) General Plan Amendment (GP) to change the site’s land use designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Community Commercial (CC); 2.) Rezone from Residential Single-Family 6,000 Square Foot (sq. ft.) Minimum Lot Size (RS-6) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN);

3.) Use Permit pursuant to CN zoning regulations to allow for the operation of a gas station with a convenience store with ABC license to sell beer and wine, and car wash, as accessory uses on the project site; and 4.) Design Review for new construction. The project has undergone several reviews by staff and was also presented to the Planning Commission at a study session on August 8, 2017.

B. The proposed project is governed by the applicable goals and policies of the Pittsburg General Plan and the Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC).

C. Pursuant to PMC section 17.16.100, an applicant may request that two or more applications for separate discretionary approvals, including zoning amendments under Title 18 of this Code, requested or required in conjunction with a project be consolidated.

D. Under Government Code section 65358, the legislative body of a local government agency may amend its general plan, in whole or in part, if it finds that the amendment would be in the public interest. No more than four general plan amendments to each required element may be adopted within one calendar year. In this calendar year so far, the City Council has adopted one amendment(s) to the General Plan Land Use Element.
1116

Page 2 of 4 ends

E. The California Government Code and Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) identify the Planning Commission as the advisory body to the City Council on amendments to the general plan. Government Code section 65353(a) requires that the Commission conduct at least one public hearing prior to making its recommendation on a proposed general plan amendment.

F. Pittsburg Municipal Code (“PMC”) section 18.16.020 identifies the Planning Commission as the advisory body to the City Council on proposed changes to the zoning map. Prior to making a recommendation, the Planning Commission must find, in accordance with PMC 18.48.030, that:

1. The change proposed is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan and applicable specific plan;

2. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed; and

3. Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice.

G. The project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Public Resources Code 21000-21189) and the State CEQA guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387).

H. The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the State CEQA Guidelines (Public Resources Code section 21080). Pursuant to the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared for the project. Based on the analysis in the study, the Planning Manager determined that potentially significant effects of the project could be lessened through specified mitigations, and subsequently, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.

I. On October 24, 2022, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) was distributed to the public for a 30-day review, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15105(b). Public distribution of the NOI consisted of delivery to the County Clerk’s Office, posting on the City’s website, and on November 10, 2022, direct mailing to all interested parties and owners/occupants of the properties directly contiguous with the project, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15072.

J. On or prior to December 2, 2022, in accordance with Government Code section 65091 and Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) section 18.14.020, a “Notice of Public Hearing” for the December 13, 2022, public hearing on this item was posted at City Hall and at and near the project site; was delivered to the Pittsburg Library; was mailed via first class mail to the applicant and property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the project site, and to local service agencies anticipated to provide services to the business; and was mailed via first class mail or email to individuals and organizations who had previously filed written request for such notice. A copy of the notice was also placed on the “Public Notices” page of the city 1117

Page 3 of 4 ends

website on December 2, 2022. The notice was also posted on www.nextdoor.com (“Nextdoor”).

Section 2. Findings
Based on the Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 13, 2022, and entitled, “Resolution Recommending Approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Use Permit for an Automobile Service Station with Convenience Store with Beer and Wine Sales, Automated Car Wash, and Approving Design Review of Site Improvement and Architectural Plans for the Construction of a Fueling Station with Three Buildings and a Canopy, for “LMK Petro, AP-16-1189 (GP, RZ, UP, DR).” and based on all the information contained in the Planning Division files on the project, incorporated here by reference and available for review in the Planning Division located at 65 Civic Avenue in Pittsburg, in the custody of the Planning Manager, and based on all written and oral testimony presented at the meeting, the Planning Commission finds that:

1. All recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The Planning Commission cannot make the following Findings below to recommend adoption of the resolution.

Zoning Map Amendment
A. and B. The change proposed is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and applicable specific plan and a community need is demonstrated for the project.

This finding cannot be made because the project area is predominantly developed with residential uses and the proposed project would be incompatible with the surrounding land uses. Rezoning the site from residential to commercial would not be consistent with the character of the existing community.

Use Permit
B. Is not detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the City.

This finding cannot be made because the project sites historical land uses are of a concern and the proposed projects proximity to the canal and not having a large enough buffer is a health and safety concern.
1118

Page 4 of 4 ends

Pittsburg City CouncilOctober 2, 2023

Pittsburg City Council
October 2, 2023