Cities Index.
Agenda

Pittsburg City Council
October 2, 2023

Document
Agenda
Meeting
October 2, 2023
Body
Pittsburg City Council
Pages
88
Original file
180.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pittsburgca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 04/28/2021. OBSERVATION: Inventory is not at or above reportable quantities.
inventory information for all reportable hazardous materials on site Violation Description: Failure to complete and electronically submit hazardous material

6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(3)
Citation: HSC 6.95 25508(a)(3) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter Violation Date: 04-23-2021
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Violation Source: CERS,
Violation Program: HW
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department and all applicable regulations wil apply.
generates hazardous waste. The facility is a hazardous waste generator business activities page. You must check yes to the statement facility hazardous waste generator program. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Resubmit form. Facility is a hazardous waste generator and must be in the checked that they generate hazardous waste on the business activities Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 04/27/2018. OBSERVATION: Facility has not Violation Description: Failure to report program data electronically.

6.11, Section(s) 25404(e)(4)
Citation: HSC 6.11 25404(e)(4) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter Violation Date: 04-20-2018
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Violation Source: CERS,
Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department electronically.
emergency response plan to reflect new owner information. Submit response plan has old owners information. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Update Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 04/24/2018. OBSERVATION: Current emergency hazardous material.
response plan and procedures for a release or threatened release of a Violation Description: Failure to establish and electronically submit an adequate emergency

6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1)
Citation: HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter Violation Date: 04-20-2018
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Violations:

G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 190
698
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 04/30/2008.

General
Violation Description: RCRA Large Quantity Generator Program - Administration/Documentation - Chapter 6.67, Section(s) Multiple Sections
Citation: HSC 6.67 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Violation Date: 03-27-2008
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Violation Source: CERS,
Violation Program: HWLQG
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 07/31/2008.

General
Violation Description: RCRA Large Quantity Generator Program - Administration/Documentation - Chapter 6.67, Section(s) Multiple Sections
Citation: HSC 6.67 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Violation Date: 04-30-2008
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Violation Source: CERS,
Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 03/20/2017.

Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Section(s) Multiple
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Violation Date: 03-03-2017
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Violation Source: CERS,
Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 11/12/2014.

Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Section(s) Multiple
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Violation Date: 10-09-2014
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Violation Source: CERS,
Violation Program: CE
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department to notify the CUPA about closure of treatment unit.

Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 03/20/2017. TP24 25201.56(d)(8)(B) - Failure Violation Description: Tiered Permitting - Administration/Documentation - General Section(s) Multiple
Citation: HSC 6.5 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5, Violation Date: 03-03-2017
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Violation Source: CERS,
Violation Program: HW
G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 191
699
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Eval Program: HWLQG
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Inspector Name: Kaufmann
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 03-27-2008
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HWLQG
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Inspector Name: Matt Kaufmann Adam Springer; No violations observed Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 02-08-2011
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Evaluation:

Violation Source: CERS,
Violation Program: HW
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department waste manifests to CCHSHMP
cleaned and closed. Submit tank closure certificate and hazardous hauler dispose of the sulfuric acid. Have sulfuric acid tank properly Acid tank is partially full. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Have a registered Violation Notes: OBSERVATION: Sulfuric Acid is no longer used in the facility. Sulfuric greater than one kilogram for more than 90 days.
hold acutely hazardous waste or extremely hazardous waste in an amount Regulations section 262.34(d), (e) and (f). (3) The generator does not The generator complies with the requirements of 40 Code of Federal hazardous waste accumulated onsite never exceeds 6,000 kilograms. (2) if all of the following conditions are met: (1) The quantity of miles) for a generator who generates less than 1000 kilogram per month disposal within 180 days (or 270 days if waste is transported over 200 Violation Description: Failure to send hazardous waste offsite for treatment, storage, or

6.5, Section(s) 25123.3(h)(1)
Citation: HSC 6.5 25123.3(h)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter Violation Date: 04-23-2021
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Violation Source: CERS,
Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 04/27/2018.
quantities.
storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Violation Description: Failure to complete and electronically submit a business plan when

6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1)
Citation: HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter Violation Date: 03-27-2018
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Violation Source: CERS,
Violation Program: HWLQG
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 192
700
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: CE
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 03-03-2017
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: APSA
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 10-09-2014
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 06-23-2021
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HWLQG
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Inspector Name: Kaufmann
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 04-30-2008
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 04-20-2018
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 04-07-2017
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Source: CERS,
G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 193
701
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 11-12-2014
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 11-12-2014
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HW
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 10-09-2014
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 10-09-2014
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HW
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 04-23-2021
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 03-27-2018
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 03-03-2017
G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 194
702
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 07-27-2018
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HWLQG
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Inspector Name: Sonny Khoo & Matt Kaufman; No violations observed Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 07-03-2008
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 04-23-2021
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HW
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Date: 04-20-2018
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HW
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 03-27-2018
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HW
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 03-03-2017
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HW
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 195
703
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 04-20-2018
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: UNSPEC
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 03-27-2018
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: HWLQG
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 04-30-2008
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enforcement Action:

Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: CE
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 10-09-2014
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Source: CERS,
Eval Program: HW
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Notes: Not reported
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Violations Found: No
Eval Date: 05-01-2018
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Source: CERS,
G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 196
704
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 04-23-2021
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: CE
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 03-03-2017
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 03-27-2018
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 10-09-2014
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: HMRRP
G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 197
705
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 04-23-2021
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: HWLQG
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 03-27-2008
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 04-20-2018
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 10-09-2014
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Site Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Date: 03-03-2017
Site Zip: 94565
Site City: PITTSBURG
Site Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 198
706
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Affiliation Phone: (513) 459-1200,
Affiliation Zip: 94565
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation City: PITTSBURG
Affiliation Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Entity Title: Not reported
Entity Name: CINTAS CORPORATION
Affiliation Type Desc: Legal Owner
Affiliation Phone: (513) 459-1200,
Affiliation Zip: 94565
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation City: PITTSBURG
Affiliation Address: 1229 CALIFORNIA AVE
Entity Title: Not reported
Entity Name: CINTAS CORPORATION
Affiliation Type Desc: Property Owner
Affiliation Phone: ,
Affiliation Zip: 45150
Affiliation Country: Not reported
Affiliation State: OH
Affiliation City: Milford
Affiliation Address: 27 Whitney Dr
Entity Title: Not reported
Entity Name: Stephen Koehler
Affiliation Type Desc: Environmental Contact
Affiliation Phone: (925) 655-3200,
Affiliation Zip: 94553
Affiliation Country: Not reported
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation City: Martinez
Affiliation Address: 4585 Pacheco BlvdSuite 100
Entity Title: Not reported
Entity Name: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Affiliation Type Desc: CUPA District
Affiliation:

Longitude: -121.866420
Latitude: 38.015910
Ref Point Type Desc: Center of a facility or station.,
Coord Name: Not reported
Program ID: 10152485
Env Int Type Code: HMBP
Facility Name: CINTAS
Site ID: 393624
Coordinates:

Enf Action Source: CERS,
Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Notes: Not reported
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 199
707
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Affiliation Country: Not reported
Affiliation State: Not reported
Affiliation City: Not reported
Affiliation Address: Not reported
Entity Title: Not reported
Entity Name: Cintas #464
Affiliation Type Desc: Parent Corporation
Affiliation Phone: ,
Affiliation Zip: Not reported
Affiliation Country: Not reported
Affiliation State: Not reported
Affiliation City: Not reported
Affiliation Address: Not reported
Entity Title: Plant Manager
Entity Name: Colton Sisler
Affiliation Type Desc: Identification Signer
Affiliation Phone: ,
Affiliation Zip: 94565
Affiliation Country: Not reported
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation City: Pittsburg
Affiliation Address: 1229 California Ave
Entity Title: Not reported
Entity Name: Mailing Address
Affiliation Type Desc: Facility Mailing Address
Affiliation Phone: ,
Affiliation Zip: Not reported
Affiliation Country: Not reported
Affiliation State: Not reported
Affiliation City: Not reported
Affiliation Address: Not reported
Entity Title: Not reported
Entity Name: Colton Peshek
Affiliation Type Desc: Document Preparer
Affiliation Phone: ,
Affiliation Zip: Not reported
Affiliation Country: Not reported
Affiliation State: Not reported
Affiliation City: Not reported
Affiliation Address: Not reported
Entity Title: Senior Cooporate Compliance Engineer
Entity Name: Jaspreet Narr
Affiliation Type Desc: Onsite Treatment Unit Owner Operator Affiliation Phone: (925) 427-4401,
Affiliation Zip: Not reported
Affiliation Country: Not reported
Affiliation State: Not reported
Affiliation City: Not reported
Affiliation Address: Not reported
Entity Title: Not reported
Entity Name: CINTAS
Affiliation Type Desc: Operator
G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 200
708
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Affiliation Phone: ,
Affiliation Zip: Not reported
G & K SERVICES, INC (Continued) 1000309414
TC6838041.2s Page 201
709

ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)Count: 3 records.ANTIOCH S106230282 PG&E FORMER CORPORATION YARD, ANTI SOMERSVILLE AND BUCHANAN RDS CPS-SLICANTIOCH S100833470 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC - JWP SOMERSVILLE AND BUCHANAN ROADS 94509 CA BOND EXP. PLANPITTSBURG S126982903 US STEEL-POSCO INDUSTRIES-PITTSBUR 900 LOVERIDGE RD SPC & 94565 SWF/LF TC6838041.2s Page 202
710
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.

Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:

EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246
EPA Region 10
Telephone 206-553-8665
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
711
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4267
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.

Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-8704
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).

This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC6838041.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
712
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6838041.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
713
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties.

Date of Government Version: 07/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: 843-820-7326
Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health.

Date of Government Version: 08/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-0695
Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls.

Date of Government Version: 08/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-0695
Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
714
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE: State Response Sites
Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity.

These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk.

Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database
The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites.

Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System
Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites.

Date of Government Version: 08/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Telephone: 916-341-6320
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
TC6838041.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
715
LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report
Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.

Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List
Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710
Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties.

Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008
Number of Days to Update: 9
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties.

Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.

Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: see region list
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6838041.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
716
LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.

Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties.

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation
Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.

Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties.

Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties.

Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786
Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.

Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: 206-553-2857
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.

Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: 312-886-7439
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
717
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 415-972-3372
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.

Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: 303-312-6271
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: 913-551-7003
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.

Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: 617-918-1313
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.

Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: 404-562-8677
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.

Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: 214-665-6597
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER)
Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
718
SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003
Number of Days to Update: 18
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147
Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 47
Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6838041.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
719
SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 7: SLIC List
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980
Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.

Date of Government Version: 01/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: FEMA
Telephone: 202-646-5797
Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Military ust sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
720
UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders.

Date of Government Version: 08/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-327-7844
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Active UST Facilities
Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: SWRCB
Telephone: 916-341-5851
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations.

Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-327-5092
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: 404-562-9424
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: 913-551-7003
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).

Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: 214-665-7591
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
721
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: 415-972-3368
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: 617-918-1313
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: 206-553-2857
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: 312-886-6136
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: 303-312-6137
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs.

Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6838041.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
722
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.

Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: 617-918-1102
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.

Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: 913-551-7365
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing
A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process.

Date of Government Version: 09/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-323-7905
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.

Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.

Date of Government Version: 06/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 68
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-566-2777
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database
Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
723
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-227-4448
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SWRCY: Recycler Database
A listing of recycling facilities in California.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-323-3836
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
A listing of registered waste tire haulers.

Date of Government Version: 09/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 12
Source: Integrated Waste Management Board
Telephone: 916-341-6422
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-308-8245
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California.

Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: 415-947-4219
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.

Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
724
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register.

Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: 202-307-1000
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database
The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR.

Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SCH: School Property Evaluation Program
This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose.

Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-255-6504
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS HAZ WASTE
List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs.

Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: CalEPA
Telephone: 916-323-2514
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
725
Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-227-4364
Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.

In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.

Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: 202-307-1000
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AQUEOUS FOAM: Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing Airports shown on this list are those believed to use Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), and certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 139 (14 CFR Part 139). This list was created by SWRCB using information available from the FAA. Location points shown are from the latitude and longitude listed on the FAA airport master record.

Date of Government Version: 12/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5455
Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
A listing of PFAS contaminated sites included in the GeoTracker database.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing
Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained.

The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list.

Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data.

Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991
Number of Days to Update: 18
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5851
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6838041.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
726
SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896
Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs.

Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-323-2514
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database
The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data.

Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-341-5851
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Local Land Records
LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing
A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder.

Date of Government Version: 08/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.

CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-6023
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
DEED: Deed Restriction Listing
TC6838041.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
727
Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners.

Date of Government Version: 08/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: DTSC and SWRCB
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.

Date of Government Version: 09/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: 202-366-4555
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills).

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Office of Emergency Services
Telephone: 916-845-8400
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER)
Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER)
Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6838041.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
728
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.

Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.

Date of Government Version: 08/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: 202-528-4285
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: 888-275-8747
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.

Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: 888-275-8747
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
729
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 615-532-8599
Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-566-1917
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.

Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 617-520-3000
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.

Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-308-4044
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-260-5521
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
730
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-0250
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.

Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4203
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-416-0223
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-8600
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.

Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4104
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6838041.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
731
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-6023
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.

Date of Government Version: 11/19/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-0500
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program.

Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2501
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.

Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.

Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-1667
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.

Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: 301-415-7169
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6838041.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
732
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 202-586-8719
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.

Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-566-0517
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.

Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-343-9775
Last EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.

Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2501
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
733
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2501
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.

Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: 202-208-3710
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.

Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 202-586-3559
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
734
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 505-845-0011
Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-8787
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: 703-305-6451
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.

Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: 202-693-9424
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
735
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.

Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-648-7709
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS.

Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-648-7709
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed.

Date of Government Version: 09/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 91
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: 202-208-2609
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).

Date of Government Version: 05/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 91
Source: EPA
Telephone: (415) 947-8000
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.

Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-0527
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
736
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2280
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: 703-704-1564
Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.

Date of Government Version: 08/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-385-6164
Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan
Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 916-255-2118
Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites).

Date of Government Version: 09/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing
list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 05/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2019
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department
Telephone: 925-454-2361
Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities
A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes:
power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
737
Date of Government Version: 08/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control
Telephone: 916-327-4498
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 08/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Telephone: 909-396-3211
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District.

Date of Government Version: 08/24/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/25/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EMI: Emissions Inventory Data
Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: California Air Resources Board
Telephone: 916-322-2990
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ENF: Enforcement Action Listing
A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter.

Date of Government Version: 04/16/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board
Telephone: 916-445-9379
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information
Date of Government Version: 10/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-255-3628
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.

Date of Government Version: 08/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board
Telephone: 916-341-6066
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-28

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
738
HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data
Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/02/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-255-1136
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICE: ICE
Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor.

Date of Government Version: 08/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control
Telephone: 877-786-9427
Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List
The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency.

Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing
Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor.

Date of Government Version: 08/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number.

Date of Government Version: 10/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-440-7145
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MINES: Mines Site Location Listing
A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-322-1080
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6838041.2s Page GR-29

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
739
MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing
The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters.

Date of Government Version: 08/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-558-1784
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing
A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater.

Date of Government Version: 11/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-445-9379
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing
A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications.

Date of Government Version: 08/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation
Telephone: 916-445-4038
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PROC: Certified Processors Database
A listing of certified processors.

Date of Government Version: 06/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-323-3836
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records
Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency.

Date of Government Version: 03/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-445-3846
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UIC: UIC Listing
A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database.

Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Deaprtment of Conservation
Telephone: 916-445-2408
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-30

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
740
UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resource Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing
Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission.

Date of Government Version: 02/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region
Telephone: 559-445-5577
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WDS: Waste Discharge System
Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements.

Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007
Number of Days to Update: 9
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5227
Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List
Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area.

Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board
Telephone: 213-576-6726
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Projects sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WDR: Waste Discharge Requirements Listing
In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter 15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-31

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
741
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5810
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System
The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities.

Date of Government Version: 08/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-794-4977
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data
The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California.

These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials
Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-323-2514
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Non-Case Information sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites
TC6838041.2s Page GR-32

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
742
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER)
Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.

Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities.

Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2497
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HWTS: Hazardous Waste Tracking System
DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility.

Date of Government Version: 07/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-324-2444
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
TC6838041.2s Page GR-33

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
743
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-648-6533
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
TC6838041.2s Page GR-34

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
744
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.

Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013
Number of Days to Update: 182
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies

COUNTY RECORDS
ALAMEDA COUNTY:

CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites
A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs).

Date of Government Version: 01/09/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 510-567-6700
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county.

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 510-567-6700
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
AMADOR COUNTY:

CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List
Date of Government Version: 11/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Amador County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-223-6439
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BUTTE COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-35

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
745
CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017
Number of Days to Update: 106
Source: Public Health Department
Telephone: 530-538-7149
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
CALVERAS COUNTY:

CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa Facility Listing
Date of Government Version: 09/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Calveras County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-754-6399
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COLUSA COUNTY:

CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 04/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Health & Human Services
Telephone: 530-458-0396
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY:

SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List
List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs.

Date of Government Version: 10/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department
Telephone: 925-646-2286
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
DEL NORTE COUNTY:

CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility list
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 707-465-0426
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EL DORADO COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-36

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
746
CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FRESNO COUNTY:

CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List
Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks.

Date of Government Version: 04/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Dept. of Community Health
Telephone: 559-445-3271
Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
GLENN COUNTY:

CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District
Telephone: 830-934-6500
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HUMBOLDT COUNTY:

CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 08/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
IMPERIAL COUNTY:

CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: San Diego Border Field Office
Telephone: 760-339-2777
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INYO COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-37

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
747
CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 760-878-0238
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
KERN COUNTY:

CUPA KERN: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the Kern County Hazardous Material Business Plan.

Date of Government Version: 07/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Kern County Public Health
Telephone: 661-321-3000
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing.

Date of Government Version: 07/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
KINGS COUNTY:

CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.

Date of Government Version: 12/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Kings County Department of Public Health
Telephone: 559-584-1411
Last EDR Contact: 12/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LAKE COUNTY:

CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Lake County Environmental Health
Telephone: 707-263-1164
Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LASSEN COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-38

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
748
CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Lassen County Environmental Health
Telephone: 530-251-8528
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES COUNTY:

AOCONCERN: Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County
San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of lead-impacted soil surrounding the former Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government Version: 7/17/2017 Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009
Number of Days to Update: 206
Source: N/A
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List
Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites.

Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Public Works
Telephone: 626-458-3517
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County.

Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: La County Department of Public Works
Telephone: 818-458-5185
Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills
Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Engineering & Construction Division
Telephone: 213-473-7869
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES AST: Active & Inactive AST Inventory
A listing of active & inactive above ground petroleum storage tank site locations, located in the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019
Number of Days to Update: 58
Source: Los Angeles Fire Department
Telephone: 213-978-3800
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-39

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
749
LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: Methane Producing Landfills
This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles County that may produce and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles County that once accepted degradable refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from a landfill survey performed by County Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
Telephone: 626-458-6973
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LOS ANGELES HM: Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory A listing of active & inactive hazardous materials facility locations, located in the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: Los Angeles Fire Department
Telephone: 213-978-3800
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES UST: Active & Inactive UST Inventory
A listing of active & inactive underground storage tank site locations and underground storage tank historical sites, located in the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Los Angeles Fire Department
Telephone: 213-978-3800
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SITE MIT LOS ANGELES: Site Mitigation List
Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint.

Date of Government Version: 05/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Community Health Services
Telephone: 323-890-7806
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city.

Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department
Telephone: 310-524-2236
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach.

Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2019
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department
Telephone: 562-570-2563
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6838041.2s Page GR-40

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
750
UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance.

Date of Government Version: 02/02/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: City of Torrance Fire Department
Telephone: 310-618-2973
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MADERA COUNTY:

CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.

Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Madera County Environmental Health
Telephone: 559-675-7823
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MARIN COUNTY:

UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites
Currently permitted USTs in Marin County.

Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: Public Works Department Waste Management
Telephone: 415-473-6647
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MENDOCINO COUNTY:

UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database
A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County.

Date of Government Version: 09/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 4
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 707-463-4466
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MERCED COUNTY:

CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 08/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Merced County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-381-1094
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MONO COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-41

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
751
CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List
CUPA Facility List
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Mono County Health Department
Telephone: 760-932-5580
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MONTEREY COUNTY:

CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing
CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division.

Date of Government Version: 10/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Monterey County Health Department
Telephone: 831-796-1297
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NAPA COUNTY:

LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county.

Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county.

Date of Government Version: 09/05/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/31/2019
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NEVADA COUNTY:

CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Community Development Agency
Telephone: 530-265-1467
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ORANGE COUNTY:

IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups
Petroleum and non-petroleum spills.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-42

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
752
Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups
Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST).

Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST).

Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PLACER COUNTY:

MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities
List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Placer County Health and Human Services
Telephone: 530-745-2363
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PLUMAS COUNTY:

CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List
Plumas County CUPA Program facilities.

Date of Government Version: 03/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2019
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Plumas County Environmental Health
Telephone: 530-283-6355
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RIVERSIDE COUNTY:

LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST).

Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 951-358-5055
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6838041.2s Page GR-43

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
753
UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List
Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county.

Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 951-358-5055
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SACRAMENTO COUNTY:

CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List
List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred.

Date of Government Version: 06/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management
Telephone: 916-875-8406
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators.

Date of Government Version: 08/02/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management
Telephone: 916-875-8406
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN BENITO COUNTY:

CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: San Benito County Environmental Health
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY:

PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits
This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers.

Date of Government Version: 08/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN DIEGO COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-44

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
754
HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.)
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division
Telephone: 619-338-2268
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities
San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities.

Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 619-338-2209
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing
A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases.

Date of Government Version: 07/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 858-505-6874
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN DIEGO CO SAM: Environmental Case Listing
The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program.

Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY:

CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa facilities
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-45

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
755
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county.

Date of Government Version: 08/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 415-252-3920
Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY:

UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST
A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county.

Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Health Department
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY:

CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List.

Date of Government Version: 08/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN MATEO COUNTY:

BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory
List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks.

Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2020
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921
Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county.

Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019
Number of Days to Update: 61
Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-46

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
756
CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing
CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division.

Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department
Telephone: 805-686-8167
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SANTA CLARA COUNTY:

CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 08/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 408-918-1973
Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county.

Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health.

Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District
Telephone: 408-265-2600
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing
A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county.

Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 408-918-3417
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities
Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites.

Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: City of San Jose Fire Department
Telephone: 408-535-7694
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY:

CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility listing.

Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health
Telephone: 831-464-2761
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SHASTA COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-47

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
757
CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List.

Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017
Number of Days to Update: 51
Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SOLANO COUNTY:

LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county.

Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2019
Number of Days to Update: 68
Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county.

Date of Government Version: 09/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SONOMA COUNTY:

CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List
Cupa Facility list
Date of Government Version: 07/02/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 8
Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 707-565-6565
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
STANISLAUS COUNTY:

CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 05/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751
Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SUTTER COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-48

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
758
UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county.

Date of Government Version: 08/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/25/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Sutter County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 530-822-7500
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TEHAMA COUNTY:

CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facilities
Date of Government Version: 01/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TRINITY COUNTY:

CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 760-352-0381
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TULARE COUNTY:

CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa program facilities
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TUOLUMNE COUNTY:

CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018
Number of Days to Update: 61
Source: Divison of Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-533-5633
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VENTURA COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-49

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
759
BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information.

Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites.

Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST).

Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List
To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County.

Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List
Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List.

Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
YOLO COUNTY:

UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county.

Date of Government Version: 09/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Yolo County Department of Health
Telephone: 530-666-8646
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
YUBA COUNTY:

TC6838041.2s Page GR-50

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
760
CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility listing for Yuba County.

Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department
Telephone: 530-749-7523
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies

OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.

CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility.

Date of Government Version: 07/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375
Last EDR Contact: 11/12/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: 518-402-8651
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: 717-783-8990
Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 401-222-2797
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6838041.2s Page GR-51

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
761
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.

Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.

Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.

AHA Hospitals:

Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.

Telephone: 312-280-5991
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.

Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: 410-786-3000
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: 301-594-6248
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.

Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states.

Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.

Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities
Source: Department of Social Services
Telephone: 916-657-4041
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.

Source: FEMA
Telephone: 877-336-2627
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
TC6838041.2s Page GR-52

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
762
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife
Telephone: 916-445-0411
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey

STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC6838041.2s Page GR-53

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
763
TC6838041.2s Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics

2. Groundwater flow velocity.

1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.

EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in Version Date: 2018
Northwest Map: 12021611 HONKER BAY, CA
Version Date: 2018
Southwest Map: 12008696 CLAYTON, CA
Version Date: 2018
Northeast Map: 12021565 ANTIOCH NORTH, CA
Version Date: 2018
Target Property Map: 12008686 ANTIOCH SOUTH, CA

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Elevation: 101 ft. above sea level
UTM Y (Meters): 4206041.0
UTM X (Meters): 599528.3
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 10
Longitude (West): 121.866456 - 121ˆ 51’ 59.24’’
Latitude (North): 37.998428 - 37ˆ 59’ 54.34’’

TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
PITTSBURG, CA 94565
1625 BUCHANAN ROAD

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL PROPERTY

TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM ®
764
TC6838041.2s Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft) Elevation (ft) TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles ✩Target Property Elevation: 101 ft.

North South
West East 340 396328 307 198 186 173148 152111 10183 95586265655146 158 138 131 123 125 130 135 139 13710198 112 105 114 123 122 122 114 103 General Topographic Gradient: General NNE

TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to

TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional

GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
765
TC6838041.2s Page A-3
For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. 2G 1/4 - 1/2 Mile West NW
1G 1/2 - 1 Mile NE NW
2 1/2 - 1 Mile NE NW
1 1/4 - 1/2 Mile West NW

LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION

MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.

Status: Not found
Search Radius: 1.25 miles
Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*:
* ©1996 Site−specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
ANTIOCH SOUTH YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map

NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage
06013C0307F FEMA FIRM Flood data
06013C0138G FEMA FIRM Flood data
06013C0119G FEMA FIRM Flood data
Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type
06013C0326F FEMA FIRM Flood data
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type

FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).

Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
766
TC6838041.2s Page A-4
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology

ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Tertiary
Series: Miocene
Code: Tm (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.

Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional

GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
767
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 2
3 1
0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles
768
TC6838041.2s Page A-6
Min: 7.9
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
3 29 inches 59 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay
Min: 7.9
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 11 inches 29 inches clay Silt-Clay
Min: 7.9
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 11 inches clay loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.

Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward Soil Surface Texture: clay loam
Soil Component Name: RINCON
Soil Map ID: 1
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil

DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
769
TC6838041.2s Page A-7
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.

Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high Soil Surface Texture: clay
Soil Component Name: CAPAY
Soil Map ID: 3
Min: 7.9
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
Clayey sand.

Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,

COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
3 29 inches 59 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay
Min: 7.9
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
Clayey sand.

Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,

COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 11 inches 29 inches clay Silt-Clay
Min: 7.9
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
Clayey sand.

Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,

COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 11 inches clay loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.

Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward Soil Surface Texture: clay loam
Soil Component Name: RINCON
Soil Map ID: 2
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
770
TC6838041.2s Page A-8

FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
State Database 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
Federal USGS 1.000

WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
3 51 inches 72 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 35 inches 51 inches clay Silt-Clay
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 35 inches clay Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
771
TC6838041.2s Page A-9
No Wells Found

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.

No PWS System Found

FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found

FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
772
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 8 0
8 0
80 1 2 0 1 2 0
1 2 0
40 8 0
1 20
1 2 0
80 8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
4 0
40 4 0
1 2 0
2 80
1 6 0
1 16 0 6 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
4 8 0
5 2 8
0 0
4 80
2 4 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
4 4 0
4 4 0
6 0 0 5 6 0
5 6 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
6 40
6 0 0 5 6 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
800
3 6 0
7 6 0
7 2 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
6 0 0
5 6 0
5 2 0
5 2 0
4 4 0 0
40 4 4 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
4 8 0
4 8 0
4 4 0
4 4 0
4 4 0
4 4 0
4 8 0
4 8
4 8 0
4 8 0
4 8 0
5 2 0
5 2 0
5 2 0
5 2 0
5 6 0
5 6 0
6 0 0
6 0 0
6 4 0
6 4 06 8 0 720 7 6 0
8 0
3 20
1 6 0
1 2
4 40
2 40
8 2 0 0
4 80
4 4 0
600
4 0 0 3 6 0 3 2 0
5 20
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0 1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
5 2 0
0 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
7 2 0
2 00
2 0 0 2 0 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
2 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
0 3 60
3 6
3 0
6 0
3 6 0
6 8 0
0 6 0 0
5 6 0
5 6 0
5 2 0
5 2 0
4 8 0
4 8 0
4 8 0
4 4 0
4 0
4 4 0
4 4 0
4 0 0
0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
CA
773
TC6838041.2s Page A-11
Date: 10/13/1985
Average Water Depth: Not Reported
Deep Water Depth: Not Reported
Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported
Groundwater Flow: NW
2G Site ID: 60614
West
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
AQUIFLOW 64743
Date: 01/29/1988
Average Water Depth: Not Reported
Deep Water Depth: 26.16
Shallow Water Depth: 24.12
Groundwater Flow: NW
1G Site ID: 12263
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
AQUIFLOW 64771
Date: 01/29/1988
Average Water Depth: Not Reported
Deep Water Depth: 26.16
Shallow Water Depth: 24.12
Groundwater Flow: NW
2 Site ID: 12263
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
AQUIFLOW 64771
Date: 10/13/1985
Average Water Depth: Not Reported
Deep Water Depth: Not Reported
Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported
Groundwater Flow: NW
1 Site ID: 60614
West
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
AQUIFLOW 64743
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ®
774
TC6838041.2s Page A-12
Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Living Area - 1st Floor 1.375 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L Number of sites tested: 4
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 94565
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.

Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.

Federal EPA Radon Zone for CONTRA COSTA County: 2
94565 29 2
______ ________ ________
Zipcode Num Tests > 4 pCi/L
Radon Test Results
State Database: CA Radon

AREA RADON INFORMATION

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
775

TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection.

Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.

Source: FEMA
Telephone: 877-336-2627
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife
Telephone: 916-445-0411

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information System R
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information.

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).

STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.

SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management.

TC6838041.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
776

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS

FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202-564-3750
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.

PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202-564-3750
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).

USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.

OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
Groundwater Ambient Monitoring & Assessment Program
State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5577
The GAMA Program is Californias comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring program. GAMA collects data by testing the untreated, raw water in different types of wells for naturally-occurring and man-made chemicals. The GAMA data includes Domestic, Monitoring and Municipal well types from the following sources, Department of Water Resources, Department of Heath Services, EDF, Agricultural Lands, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Pesticide Regulation, United States Geological Survey, Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program and Local Groundwater Projects.

Water Well Database
Source: Department of Water Resources
Telephone: 916-651-9648
California Drinking Water Quality Database
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-324-2319
The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information.

California Oil and Gas Well Locations
Source: Dept of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division Telephone: 916-323-1779
Oil and Gas well locations in the state.

California Earthquake Fault Lines
Source: California Division of Mines and Geology
The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology.

RADON
State Database: CA Radon
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-210-8558
Radon Database for California
TC6838041.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
777
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-356-4020
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.

The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions.

EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-356-4020
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels.

OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology.

STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC6838041.2s Page PSGR-3

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
778

APPENDIX E

PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN
779
780

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Project Data ..................................................................................................................1 II. Setting ..........................................................................................................................1 II.A. Project Location and Description ............................................................................................................. 1 II.B. Existing Site Features and Conditions ...................................................................................................... 2 II.C. Opportunities and Constraints for Stormwater Control ........................................................................ 2 III. Low Impact Development Design Strategies ..............................................................2 III.A. Optimization of Site Layout ....................................................................................................................... 2 III.A.1. Limitation of development envelope 2
III.A.2. Preservation of natural drainage features 2
III.A.3. Setbacks from creeks, wetlands, and riparian habitats 2 III.A.4. Minimization of imperviousness 2
III.A.5. Use of drainage as a design element 2
III.B. Use of Permeable Pavements ..................................................................................................................... 3 III.C. Dispersal of Runoff to Pervious Areas ..................................................................................................... 3 III.D. Bioretention or other Integrated Management Practices ....................................................................... 3 IV. Documentation of Drainage Design .............................................................................4 IV.A. Descriptions of each Drainage Management Area ................................................................................. 4 IV.A.1. Table of Drainage Management Areas for LID Facilities 4 IV.A.2. Drainage Management Area Descriptions 5
IV.B. Integrated Management Practice Descriptions ........................................................................................ 6 IV.B.1. Information Summary for IMP Design 6
IV.B.2. Self-Treating Areas 6
IV.B.3. Areas Not Treated 6
IV.B.4. Areas Draining to IMPs 7
V. Source Control Measures .............................................................................................9 V.A. Site activities and potential sources of pollutants .................................................................................... 9 V.B. Source Control Table .................................................................................................................................. 9 VI. Stormwater Facility Maintenance ..............................................................................11 VI.A. Ownership and Responsibility for Maintenance in Perpetuity ........................................................... 11 VI.B. Summary of Maintenance Requirements for Each Stormwater Facility ........................................... 11 VII. Construction Plan C.3 Checklist ................................................................................12 VIII.Certifications ..............................................................................................................13 781
Tables
Table 1. Project Data .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Table 2. Table of Drainage Management Areas for LID Facilities .......................................................... 4-5 Table 3. Information Summary for IMP Design ............................................................................................ 6 Table 4. Self-Treating Areas .............................................................................................................................. 6 Table 5. Areas Not Treated ............................................................................................................................... 6 Table 6. Areas Draining to IMP 1 .................................................................................................................... 7 Table 7. Areas Draining to IMP 2 .................................................................................................................... 8 Table 8. Source Control Table .................................................................................................................... 9-10 Table 9. Construction Plan C.3 Checklist ................................................................................................ 12-13 Attachments
Stormwater Control Plan Exhibit
IMP Sizing Calculator Output
782
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 1 of 13 December 20, 2018 I. PROJECT DATA
Table 1. Project Data
Project Name/Number C-Store/Gas Station Car Wash
Application Submittal Date To be submitted by applicant Project Location 1625 Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565 (088-030-021) Name of Developer TBD
Project Phase No. NA
Project Type and Description Gas station, car wash, and convenience store with parking lot
Project Watershed Willow and Kirker Creek
Total Project Site Area (acres) ± 4.8 acres
Total Area of Land Disturbed (acres) ± 2.71 acres
Total New Impervious Surface Area (sq. ft.) 22,259 sf (0.51 acres) Total Replaced Impervious Surface Area 20,421 sf (0.47 acres) Total Pre-Project Impervious Surface Area 29,470 sf (0.68 acres) Total Post-Project Impervious Surface Area 43,516 sf (1 acre) 50% Rule Applies
Project Density Per Applicant
Applicable Special Project Categories None
Percent LID and non-LID treatment 100% LID
HM Compliance Applies
II. SETTING
II.A. Project Location and Description
This project is located on the northwest corner of Buchanan Road and Meadows Avenue intersection within the City of Pittsburg, Contra Costa County, California. Residential units and Norine Drive are to the west of the project. To the north of the project is Contra Costa Canal. Open space is to the east of the project. The proposed development will consist of a convenience store, gas station, car wash, and parking lot. Two existing structures, a cell tower and building, will remain in their original locations.
783
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 2 of 13 December 20, 2018 II.B. Existing Site Features and Conditions
The property is approximately 4.8 acres and has elevations ranging from 134’ to 95’. The slopes within the site vary, as high as 60% and as little as 3%. Most of the surface runoff drains north offsite. Another portion of the surface runoff is collected by an existing storm drain inlet before outfalling into the existing storm drain system east of the property along Buchanan Road.

Half of the property is undeveloped and consists of brush and trees. The rest of the property includes an auto repair service, parking lot, cell tower, and several structures. The soil type is hydrologic soil group C based on United States Department of Agriculture National Resources Conservation Service.

II.C. Opportunities and Constraints for Stormwater Control Primary stormwater control constraints for this project consist of:
 Potential oil spills, preventing the use of pervious pavement;  Heavy vehicular traffic; and
 Steep slopes in several areas, preventing treatment areas in those locations During the planning stages, stormwater treatment and hydromodification have been integrated within the project site. Two bioretention facilities, for stormwater treatment, and one retention pond, for hydromodification, have been designed across the site, centrally located north of the parking lot.

Approximately 80% of the site will remain as either existing pervious area or proposed landscaped areas, which helps to reduce the amount of C.3 treatment required.

The minor areas throughout the site that are not treated consist of less than 160 square feet and are limited within the frontage area along Buchanan Road.

III. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STRATEGIES
III.A. Optimization of Site Layout
III.A.1. Limitation of development envelope
The proposed development is centrally located within the site and utilizes mostly the existing flat areas. Proposed site minimizes the disturbance of existing vegetation and soils.

III.A.2. Preservation of natural drainage features
There are no natural drainage features within the project boundary.

III.A.3. Setbacks from creeks, wetlands, and riparian habitats There are no creeks, wetlands, and riparian habitats within the project site.

III.A.4. Minimization of imperviousness
The proposed development limits potential impervious areas. Approximately 80% of the site will remain as existing pervious area or proposed landscaped areas.

III.A.5. Use of drainage as a design element
The buildings and parking lot, within the site, drain north to the bioretention facilities, resulting in the preservation of the site’s natural drainage patterns and the enhancement of the site’s natural character.
784
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 3 of 13 December 20, 2018 III.B. Use of Permeable Pavements
Since the proposed development includes a car wash and gas station, there may be potential oil spills, preventing the use of pervious pavement.

III.C. Dispersal of Runoff to Pervious Areas
Runoff from the buildings and parking lot will be directed to bioretention basins prior to entering the large retention pond.

III.D. Bioretention or other Integrated Management Practices Bioretention Facilities
Bioretention facilities will be designed and constructed in accordance with the criteria included within the Guidebook. A cross section of the bioretention area is included on the preliminary Stormwater Control Plan Exhibit. Bioretention facilities have the following characteristics:
 Ponding depth will be 10” min.
 18” depth “loamy sand” soil mix with minimum long-term percolation rate of 5”/hour.  Area of soil mix meets or exceeds minimum.
 Perforated pipe (PVC SDR 35 or approved equivalent) underdrain bedded in “Class 2 perm” with connection and sufficient head to storm drain or discharge point.  No filter fabric between sandy loam and class 2 perm layer.  Underdrain has a clean-out port consisting of a vertical, rigid, non-perforated PVC pipe, with a minimum diameter of 4 inches and a watertight cap.
 Location and footprint of facility are shown on site plan, landscaping, and grading plan.  Bioretention area is designed as a basin (level edges), and final grading plan will be consistent with these elevations.
 Curb inlets are 12” wide, have a 4”-6” reveal and an apron or other provision to prevent blockage when vegetation grows in, and energy dissipation as needed.  Overflow connected to a downstream storm drain or approved discharge point.  Emergency spillage will be safely conveyed overland.
 Plantings are suitable to the climate, exposure, and a well-drained soil, and occasional inundation during large storm events.
 Irrigation system with connection to water supply, on a separate zone.  Vaults, utility boxes, and light standards are located outside the minimum soil mix surface area.  When excavating, avoid smearing of the soils on bottom and side slopes. Minimize compaction of native soils and “rip” soils if clayey and/or compacted. Protect the area from construction site runoff.
 Volume of subsurface storage meets or exceeds minimum.  Underdrain is connected to discharge through an appropriately sized orifice or other flowlimiting device. 785
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 4 of 13 December 20, 2018 IV. DOCUMENTATION OF DRAINAGE DESIGN
IV.A. Descriptions of each Drainage Management Area
IV.A.1. Table of Drainage Management Areas for LID Facilities Table 2
DMA Name Area (SF) Surface Type/Description DMA Type/Drains to DMA 1 32,524 Landscape IMP 1
DMA 2 13,251 Entry Drive/Parking Lot IMP 1
DMA 3 5,991 Landscape IMP 1
DMA 4 2,656 Landscape IMP 1
DMA 5 2,800 Roof IMP 1
DMA 6 77 Landscape IMP 1
DMA 7 5,024 Landscape IMP 1
DMA 8 977 Sidewalk IMP 1
DMA 9 15,529 Entry Drive/Parking Lot IMP 2
DMA 10 4,322 Landscape IMP 2
DMA 11 4,254 Roof IMP 2
DMA 12 951 Landscape IMP 2
DMA 13 1,580 Sidewalk IMP 2
DMA 14 3,850 Roof IMP 2
DMA 15 2,400 Landscape IMP 2
DMA 16 297 Landscape IMP 2
DMA 17 307 Existing Concrete Pad IMP 2
DMA 18 1,535 Landscape IMP 2
DMA 19 529 Existing Roof/Sidewalk IMP 2
DMA 20 207 Wall IMP 2
786
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 5 of 13 December 20, 2018 DMA 21 232 Wall IMP 1
IV.A.2. Drainage Management Area Descriptions
DMA 1, totaling 32,524 square feet, drains a portion of the existing pervious area/landscaping. DMA 1 drains to bioretention facility IMP 1.

DMA 2, totaling 13,251 square feet, drains a portion of the entry drive/parking lot. DMA 2 drains to bioretention facility IMP 1.

DMA 3, totaling 5,991 square feet, drains a portion of the landscaping. DMA 3 drains to bioretention facility IMP 1.

DMA 4, totaling 2,656 square feet, drains a portion of the landscaping. DMA 4 drains to bioretention facility IMP 1.

DMA 5, totaling 2,800 square feet, drains the roof. DMA 5 drains to bioretention facility IMP 1.

DMA 6, totaling 77 square feet, drains a portion of the landscaping. DMA 6 drains to bioretention facility IMP 1.

DMA 7, totaling 5,024 square feet, drains a portion of the landscaping. DMA 7 drains to bioretention facility IMP 1.

DMA 8, totaling 977 square feet, drains a portion of the sidewalk. DMA 8 drains to bioretention facility IMP 1.

DMA 9, totaling 15,529 square feet, drains a portion of the entry drive/parking lot. DMA 9 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 10, totaling 4,322 square feet, drains a portion of the landscaping. DMA 10 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 11, totaling 4,254 square feet, drains the roof. DMA 11 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 12, totaling 951 square feet, drains a portion of the landscaping. DMA 12 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 13, totaling 1,580 square feet, drains a portion of the sidewalk. DMA 13 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 14, totaling 3,850 square feet, drains the roof. DMA 14 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 15, totaling 2,400 square feet, drains a portion of the landscaping. DMA 15 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 16, totaling 297 square feet, drains a portion of the landscaping. DMA 16 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 17, totaling 307 square feet, drains the existing concrete pad. DMA 17 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 18, totaling 1,535 square feet, drains a portion of the landscaping. DMA 18 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 19, totaling 529 square feet, drains the existing roof/sidewalk. DMA 19 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 20, totaling 207 square feet, drains the wall. DMA 20 drains to bioretention facility IMP 2.

DMA 21, totaling 232 square feet, drains the wall. DMA 21 drains to bioretention facility IMP 1. 787
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 6 of 13 December 20, 2018 IV.B. Integrated Management Practice Descriptions
IV.B.1. Information Summary for IMP Design
Table 3
Total Project Area Requiring Treatment (Square Feet) 104,499 Mean Annual Precipitation 14.5
IMPs Designed For: Treatment Plus Flow Control
IV.B.2. Self-Treating Areas
Table 4
DMA Name Area (square feet)
ST 1 93,417
ST 2 12,280
Total 105,697
IV.B.3. Areas Not Treated
Table 5
Area Name Area (square feet) Post-project Surface Type
NT 1 77 Frontage
NT 2 76 Frontage
Total 153
788
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 7 of 13 December 20, 2018 IV.B.4. Areas Draining to IMPs
Table 6
IMP Name: IMP1 (Soil Type: C)
IMP Type: Bioretention Facility
Soil Type: C
DMA
Name
DMA
Area
(sq ft)
PostProject
Surface
Type
DMA
Runoff
Factor
DMA
Area
x
Runoff
Factor

IMP Sizing
DMA1 32,524 Landscape 0.50 16,262
IMP
Sizing
Factor
Rain
Adjustment
Factor
Minimum
Area or Volume
Proposed
Area or
Volume
DMA2 13,251 Concrete or
Asphalt 1.00 13,251
DMA3 5,991 Landscape 0.50 2,996
DMA4 2,656 Landscape 0.50 1,328
DMA5 2,800 Conventional
Roof 1.00 2,800
DMA6 77 Landscape 0.50 39
DMA7 5,024 Landscape 0.50 2,512
DMA8 977 Concrete or
Asphalt 1.00 977
DMA21 232 Concrete or
Asphalt 1.00 232
Total 40,396
Area 0.060 1.209 2,930 2,945
Surface Volume 0.050 1.209 2,442 2,454
Subsurface Volume 0.066 1.209 3,223 3,240
Maximum
Underdrain Flow
(cfs)

0.06 Orifice Diameter (in) 1.54
789
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 8 of 13 December 20, 2018 Table 7
IMP Name: IMP2 (Soil Type: C)
IMP Type: Bioretention Facility
Soil Type: C
DMA
Name
DMA
Area
(sq ft)
PostProject
Surface
Type
DMA
Runoff
Factor
DMA
Area
x
Runoff
Factor

IMP Sizing
DMA9 15,529 Concrete or
Asphalt 1.00 15,529
IMP
Sizing
Factor
Rain
Adjustment
Factor
Minimum
Area or Volume
Proposed
Area or
Volume
DMA10 4,322 Landscape 0.50 2,161
DMA11 4,254 Conventional
Roof 1.00 4,254
DMA12 951 Landscape 0.50 476
DMA13 1,580 Concrete or
Asphalt 1.00 1,580
DMA14 3,850 Conventional
Roof 1.00 3,850
DMA15 2,400 Landscape 0.50 1,200
DMA16 297 Landscape 0.50 149
DMA17 307 Conventional
Roof 1.00 307
DMA18 1,535 Landscape 0.50 768
DMA19 529 Conventional
Roof 1.00 529
DMA20 207 Concrete or
Asphalt 1.00 207
Total 31,009
Area 0.060 1.209 2,249 2,257
Surface Volume 0.050 1.209 1,874 1,881
Subsurface Volume 0.066 1.209 2,474 2,483
Maximum
Underdrain Flow
(cfs)

0.03 Orifice Diameter (in) 1.15
790
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 9 of 13 December 20, 2018 V. SOURCE CONTROL MEASURES
V.A.Site activities and potential sources of pollutants The project will create potential sources of stormwater pollutants. Sources to be controlled include:
 Potential dumping of wash-water or other liquids into storm drains inlets.  Oil spills
 Need for future indoor or structural pest control.
 Fertilizers and pesticides used in yard maintenance.
 Fire sprinkler test water
 Miscellaneous drain or wash water
 Refuse will be handled by owner. Owner will be required to store their cans in a covered area.
 Convenience store
V.B.Source Control Table
Table 8
Potential source of
runoff pollutants
Permanent
source control BMPs
Operational
source control BMPs
On-site dumping into
storm drain inlets
All accessible on-site inlets will
be marked with the words “No
Dumping! Flows to Creek”
Markings will be periodically repainted
or replaced.

Inlets and pipes conveying stormwater
to BMPs will be inspected and
maintained as part of BMP Operation
and Maintenance Plan.

Need for future
indoor or structural
pest control
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
information will be provided to property
owners.

Landscape/outdoor
pesticide use
Final landscape plans will:

Be designed to minimize
irrigation and runoff and to
minimize use of fertilizers and
pesticides that can contribute to
stormwater pollution.

Specific plantings within
bioretention areas and swales
that are tolerant of the sandy
loam soil and periodic
inundation.

Include pest-resistant plants.

Landscape will be maintained using
minimum or no pesticides.

IPM information will be provided to
property owners.
791
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 10 of 13 December 20, 2018 Include plantings appropriate to
site soils, slopes, climate, sun,
wind, rain, land use, air
movement, ecological
consistency and plant
interactions.

Fire sprinkler test
water
Fire sprinkler test valves will be
equipped with a means to divert
test water to the sanitary sewer.

See Plumbing plan sheets, P2.01A-C
Convenience store,
sidewalks, and parking
lots
Sweep store, sidewalks, and parking lots
to prevent accumulation of litter and
debris. Collect debris from pressure
washing to prevent entry into the storm
drain system. Collect wash water
containing any cleaning agent or
degreaser and discharge to the sanitary
sewer, not to the storm drain.

Miscellaneous drain or
wash water
Boiler drain lines shall be
directly or indirectly connected
to the sanitary sewer system and
will not drain to the storm drain
system.

Condensate drain lines will
discharge to the sanitary sewer
system or to landscape areas.

Rooftop mounted equipment
will be roofed or covered to
prevent pollutants from
entering runoff.

Drainage sumps shall feature a
sediment sump to reduce the
quantity of sediment in pumped
water.

Roofing, gutters, and trim shall
not be copper or other
unprotected metal that could
leach into runoff.
792
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 11 of 13 December 20, 2018 VI. STORMWATER FACILITY MAINTENANCE
VI.A. Ownership and Responsibility for Maintenance in Perpetuity The owner agrees to operate and maintain the stormwater treatment facilities (bioretention facilities) constructed in connection with the project. Also, the applicant will be responsible for paying for maintenance of treatment facilities and executing a Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement and Right of Entry in the form provided by the City of Pittsburg.

A Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Plan will be prepared as a separate document.

This plan includes detailed maintenance requirements and a maintenance schedule.

VI.B. Summary of Maintenance Requirements for Each Stormwater Facility Bioretention facilities receive runoff from proposed storm drain system. The runoff briefly floods the surface of the treatment area and then percolates through an active soil layer to drain rock below.

Typical routine maintenance consists of the following:
 Examine storm drain inlets or sheet flow from paving and landscaped areas to ensure that flow to the bioretention facility is unimpeded. Remove any debris and repair any damaged pipes. Check splash blocks or rocks and repair, replace, or replenish as necessary.  Examine the overflow pipe to make sure that it can safely convey excess flows to a storm drain. Repair or replace any damaged or disconnected piping.  Check the underdrain piping to make sure it is intact and unobstructed.  Observe the structure of the box and fix any holes, cracks, rotting, or failure.  Check that the soil is at the appropriate depth to allow a reservoir above the soil surface, and is sufficient to effectively filter stormwater. Remove any accumulations of sediment, litter, and debris. Till or replace soil as necessary. Confirm that soil is not clogging and that the planter will drain 3-4 hours after a storm event.
 Determine whether the vegetation is dense and healthy. Replace dead plants. Prune or remove any overgrown plants or shrubs that may interfere with planter operation. Clean up fallen leaves or debris and replenish mulch. Remove any nuisance or invasive vegetation.  Abate any potential vectors by filling holes in the ground in and around the swale and by insuring that there are no areas where water stands longer than 48 hours following a storm.

If mosquito larvae are present and persistent, contact the Contra Costa Mosquito and Vector Control District for information and advice. Mosquito larvicides should be applied only when necessary and then only by a licensed individual or contractor. 793
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 12 of 13 December 20, 2018 VII. CONSTRUCTION PLAN C.3 CHECKLIST
Table 9
Stormwater
Control
Plan
Page # BMP Description See Plan Sheet #s
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 1 is directed
to IMP 1.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 2 is directed
to IMP 1.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 3 is directed
to IMP 1.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 4 is directed
to IMP 1.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 5 is directed
to IMP 1.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 6 is directed
to IMP 1.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 7 is directed
to IMP 1.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 8 is directed
to IMP 1.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 9 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 10 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 11 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 12 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 13 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
794
C-Store/Gas Station Gar Wash Page 13 of 13 December 20, 2018 Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 14 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 15 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 16 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 17 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 18 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 19 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 20 is directed
to IMP 2.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
Section
IV
Runoff from DMA 21 is directed
to IMP 1.
1 (C.3 Exhibit)
VIII.CERTIFICATIONS
The selection, sizing, and preliminary design of stormwater treatment and other control measures in this plan meet the requirements of Regional Water Quality Control Board Order R2-2015-0049.

795

ATTACHMENT A

STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN EXHIBIT
796
x x x x
x
x x
x x
x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
xx
x x x
x x
x x x x x x
x x x x x
x
x
x x
x x
x x x x
x x x x
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD

85.00 90.00

95.00 95.00

95.00 95.00

95.00 100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
105.00
105.00
105.00
105.00
105.00
105.00
105.00
105.00
105.00
105.00
105.00
105.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
115.00
115.00
115.00
115.00
115.00
115.00
115.00
115.00
115.00
115.00
120.00
120.00
120.00
120.00
120.00
120.00
120.00
125.00
125.00
125.00
125.00
130.00
130.00 130.00
SHEET 1 OF 1
1931 SAN MIGUEL DRIVE, SUITE 100, WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596, (925) 932-6868

C-STORE
C.3 EXHIBIT
DECEMBER 20, 2018
797

ATTACHMENT B

CONTRA COSTA IMP CALCULATOR

SUMMARY REPORT
798
Project Name: C-Store
Project Type: Treatment and Flow Control
APN: 088030021
Drainage Area: 104,828
Mean Annual Precipitation: 14.5
IV. Areas Draining to IMPs
IMP Name: IMP1
IMP Type: Bioretention Facility
Soil Group: IMP1
DMA Name Area (sq ft) Post Project
Surface Type
DMA Runoff
Factor
DMA Area x
Runoff Factor IMP Sizing
DMA1 32,933 Landscape 0.50 16,467 IMP Sizing
Factor
Rain
Adjustment
Factor
Minimum
Area or
Volume
Proposed
Area or
Volume
DMA2 13,177 Concrete or
Asphalt

1.00 13,177
DMA3 5,991 Landscape 0.50 2,996
DMA4 2,656 Landscape 0.50 1,328
DMA5 2,800 Conventional
Roof

1.00 2,800
DMA6 77 Landscape 0.50 39
DMA7 5,045 Landscape 0.50 2,523
DMA8 977 Concrete or
Asphalt

1.00 977
DMA21 232 Concrete or
Asphalt

1.00 232
Total 40,537
Area 0.060 1.209 2,941 2,945
Surface Volume 0.050 1.209 2,450 2,454
Subsurface Volume 0.066 1.209 3,235 3,240
Maximum
Underdrain
Flow (cfs)

0.06 Orifice
Diameter (in)

1.54 IMP Name: IMP2
IMP Type: Bioretention Facility
Soil Group: IMP2
DMA Name Area (sq ft) Post Project
Surface Type
DMA Runoff
Factor
DMA Area x
Runoff Factor IMP Sizing
DMA9 15,529 Concrete or
Asphalt

1.00 15,529 IMP Sizing
Factor
Rain
Adjustment
Minimum
Area or
Proposed
Area or
799
DMA10 4,322 Landscape 0.50 2,161 Factor Volume Volume
DMA11 4,254 Conventional
Roof

1.00 4,254
DMA12 951 Landscape 0.50 476
DMA13 1,580 Concrete or
Asphalt

1.00 1,580
DMA14 3,850 Conventional
Roof

1.00 3,850
DMA15 2,400 Landscape 0.50 1,200
DMA16 297 Landscape 0.50 149
DMA17 307 Conventional
Roof

1.00 307
DMA18 1,506 Landscape 0.50 753
DMA19 529 Conventional
Roof

1.00 529
DMA20 207 Concrete or
Asphalt

1.00 207
Total 30,994
Area 0.060 1.209 2,248 2,257
Surface Volume 0.050 1.209 1,874 1,881
Subsurface Volume 0.066 1.209 2,473 2,483
Maximum
Underdrain
Flow (cfs)

0.03 Orifice
Diameter (in)

1.15 Report generated on 11/28/2018 12:00:00 AM by the Contra Costa Clean Water Program IMP Sizing Tool software (version 1.3.1.0). 800

APPENDIX F

SPECTRAL SOUND MEASUREMENTS SUMMARY REPORT
801
August 11, 2016
Ms. Cheryl Dobie
Aerodry Systems, LLC
P.O. Box 907
Broomfield, Colorado 80038
Re: Aerodry – Spectral Sound Measurements (DLAA #16-131) Summary Report Dear Cheryl,
The following is a summary of the blower sound level measurements taken at the site on August 4, 2016. Attached is Table 1 which is a summary of the 1/3 octave band sound measurements taken at the site.

We measured a variety of configurations with various model numbers that correspond to different groupings of dryers. The system sizes ranging from 45 HP to 120 HP consisted of configurations utilizing 1 and 2 overhead towers and 1 set of 6-outlet side columns..

Measurements were taken in ANSI-standard 1/3-octave bands between 25 Hertz (Hz) and 20,000 Hz. The blowers were located as shown in Figure 1. Sound measurements were taken outside the building at four distances: 1m, 20’, 50’, and 90’ from the exterior edge of the building at centerline of the opening as shown in Figure 1.

Table 1 (enclosed) summarizes the measurements taken at the four measurement locations under six different operating conditions as described below Table 1.

Measurements were taken with a Larson Davis Model 831 Type 1 sound level meter and a PCB Piezotronics Model 377B02 condensing microphone. Immediately prior to measuring, the sound level meter’s calibration was checked and recorded. Calibration was again verified at the conclusion of the measurements. All of our equipment has been calibrated within the recommended time period set by the manufacturer. Documentation verifying measurement calibration compliance is available upon request,
If you have any questions, please call me.

Sincerely,
Mick Barnhardt
Senior Consultant Encl: Figure 1; Table 1
802
Figure
Dryer Configuration
Aerodry
8-11-16 Project No.
16-161 Drawn by
MBB
scale: 1/4” = 1’ - 0” 1
1536 Ogden Street Denver, Colorado 80218
303/455-1900 FAX 303/455-9187
acoustics | performing arts | technology
D. L. ADAMS

A S S O C I A T E S
A
B
C
D
1 m
20’
50’
90’

INTERIOR

EXTERIOR
Measurement Positions
803
TABLE 1: Sound Measurement Summary (in dB)
1/3 Octave Band Frequency
Location Condition 25.0 31.5 40.0 50.0 63.0 80.0 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1000 1250 1600 2000 2500 3150 4000 5000 6300 8000 10000 12500 16000 20000 dBA A Condition 1 75 75 76 79 79 78 73 72 76 73 67 75 83 81 66 65 66 65 66 65 65 62 60 59 57 56 55 52 47 39 82 B Condition 1 63 67 69 70 74 67 66 61 64 62 60 64 76 71 55 57 55 56 54 56 54 51 51 50 48 46 45 42 36 29 74C Condition 1 60 61 60 64 68 65 62 61 59 57 54 59 68 64 50 50 48 50 49 49 48 45 44 43 40 37 34 30 24 16 67 D Condition 1 57 55 57 61 62 63 64 56 53 52 49 55 64 58 45 46 45 45 45 44 43 40 39 37 34 30 27 22 16 10 62 A Condition 2 69 73 74 76 79 80 80 74 74 77 73 68 73 81 81 74 66 69 67 67 66 66 63 62 61 59 58 56 53 49 81 B Condition 2 65 65 68 70 74 70 66 64 65 63 58 66 73 71 60 57 57 57 57 56 57 53 52 51 49 47 46 43 38 30 73C Condition 2 60 60 62 64 69 66 61 61 59 58 53 60 67 65 59 52 51 52 51 50 50 47 45 44 41 39 36 32 26 17 67 D Condition 2 61 57 59 64 64 62 59 58 54 54 49 55 62 59 46 48 47 47 47 46 46 41 41 39 36 32 29 23 16 9 62 A Condition 3 76 76 77 78 80 82 74 76 78 73 71 75 84 80 68 67 69 68 69 67 68 64 63 63 60 59 57 54 51 44 83 B Condition 3 65 67 68 70 74 73 66 64 66 63 59 67 77 72 59 58 57 56 57 56 56 54 53 52 49 47 46 42 37 29 75C Condition 3 61 62 63 64 69 68 61 60 61 59 55 62 70 65 51 52 51 52 51 50 50 47 46 45 42 39 36 32 26 17 68 D Condition 3 59 58 58 60 63 65 58 58 55 53 51 56 65 60 45 47 46 46 47 45 45 43 41 39 35 32 28 23 16 9 63 A Condition 4 74 75 76 80 81 80 75 76 78 75 69 72 80 84 73 67 71 69 69 68 68 65 64 62 61 59 57 55 50 42 84 B Condition 4 65 65 68 72 75 73 68 66 66 65 59 63 72 74 63 59 58 59 59 59 58 56 54 53 51 49 48 45 39 31 74C Condition 4 61 62 62 66 70 67 63 61 61 60 55 59 65 67 58 52 51 53 53 52 51 49 47 46 43 41 38 34 28 19 68 D Condition 4 58 57 59 63 64 64 60 58 56 55 52 54 60 62 58 49 47 48 49 48 46 44 42 41 37 34 30 25 18 11 63 A Condition 5 77 77 79 80 84 84 77 79 81 76 73 74 81 83 73 69 73 71 72 71 71 67 66 66 63 62 60 58 54 46 85 B Condition 5 68 69 71 72 77 75 69 67 68 65 61 67 75 75 64 61 60 60 61 61 60 57 56 56 53 51 50 47 42 34 76C Condition 5 63 63 63 66 72 70 63 62 63 61 57 61 67 68 60 54 54 55 54 54 53 50 49 48 45 42 40 36 30 21 69 D Condition 5 59 59 60 62 64 66 61 61 58 56 51 56 62 63 54 49 49 49 50 49 48 45 44 42 38 35 32 26 19 11 64 A Condition 6 76 76 78 79 82 82 75 77 79 74 72 76 83 81 75 68 70 69 69 68 69 65 64 63 61 59 58 55 51 43 84 B Condition 6 66 68 69 71 76 74 67 65 67 64 60 68 76 72 63 59 57 58 59 58 58 55 54 53 50 49 47 44 39 31 75C Condition 6 62 62 62 64 71 69 62 60 61 59 56 61 68 64 55 53 52 52 52 51 51 48 47 46 42 39 37 33 27 18 68 D Condition 6 58 58 58 62 63 65 60 59 58 55 51 55 63 60 50 48 46 47 48 47 46 44 41 40 36 32 29 24 17 10 63 Location A: 1 meter from exterior door opening Condition 1: Model A45 Location B: 20 feet from exterior door opening Condition 2: Model A60Location C: 50 feet from exterior door opening Condition 3: Model A60+ Location D: 90 feet from exterior door opening Condition 4: Model A90 Condition 5: Model A120Condition 6: Model A75
Results are exclusive to the Advantage Drying System manufactured by Aerodry Systems, LLC. Use and interpretation for other equipment models or brands is expressly prohibited. Aerodry Systems, LLC is an independent, certified WBE. 804

APPENDIX G

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT
805
Final Traffic Impact Analysis Report
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
August 18, 2017
City of Pittsburg, California
806
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
Page | i
Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1

1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4

1.1 Project Description .................................................................................................................................................................. 4

1.2 Study Intersections .................................................................................................................................................................. 4

1.3 Intersection Analysis Scenarios ........................................................................................................................................... 5

1.4 Study Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................ 8

1.5 Significant Impact Criteria/Level of Service Standards ...........................................................................................10

2.0 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 13

2.1 Existing Setting and Roadway System ...........................................................................................................................13

2.2 Existing Pedestrian Facilities ..............................................................................................................................................15

2.3 Existing Bicycle Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................15

2.4 Existing Transit Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................16

2.5 Existing Intersection Volumes and Lane Configurations ........................................................................................21

2.6 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions .................................................................................21

3.0 Existing plus Project Conditions .......................................................................................................... 24

3.1 Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................................................24

3.2 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ....................................................................................................................24

3.3 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Plus Project Conditions ........................................................27

3.4 Queuing Analysis At The Selected Study Intersections – Existing Plus Project Conditions ......................30

3.5 Queuing and Level of Service Analysis at Project Driveway .................................................................................31

4.0 Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions ..................................................................................................... 32

4.1 Intersections Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions ...............................................32

5.0 Cumulative plus Project Conditions .................................................................................................... 35

5.1 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative Plus Project Conditions ................................................35

5.2 Project Fair Share Calculation ...........................................................................................................................................36

6.0 Site Access and On-Site Circulation and other impacts .................................................................... 39

6.1 On-Site Circulation ................................................................................................................................................................39

6.2 Pedestrian Access ...................................................................................................................................................................39 807
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
Page | ii

6.3 Bicycle Access ..........................................................................................................................................................................40

6.4 Transit .........................................................................................................................................................................................40

6.5 Sight Distance Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................40

6.6 Parking........................................................................................................................................................................................40

7.0 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 42 Tables
Table 1: Level of Service for Signalized Intersections ............................................................................................................ 9 Table 2: Level of Service for Unsignalized Intersections ....................................................................................................... 9 Table 3: Intersection Level of Service Significance Criteria ............................................................................................... 11 Table 4: Existing Transit Services ................................................................................................................................................. 17 Table 5: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions ........................................................................... 21 Table 6: Proposed Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................. 25 Table 7: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Conditions .................................................. 27 Table 8: 95th Percentile Queues – Existing plus Project Conditions ............................................................................. 30 Table 9: 95th Percentile Queues and Level of Service at Project Driveways ............................................................... 31 Table 10: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions ......................................... 33 Table 11: Intersection Level of Service Analysis - Cumulative plus Project Conditions ......................................... 35 Table 12: Fair Share Analysis – Cumulative plus Project Conditions ............................................................................. 37 Figures
Figure 1: Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2: Project Site Plan ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 3: Existing Pedestrian Facilities ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 4: Existing Bicycle Facilities .............................................................................................................................................. 19 Figure 5: Existing Transit Facilities .............................................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 6: Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls ...................................................................................................... 22 Figure 7: Existing Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................. 23 Figure 8: Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ............................................................................................................. 26 Figure 9: Existing plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........................................................................ 29 808
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
Page | iii
Figure 10: Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................... 34 Figure 11: Cumulative plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................................................. 38 Appendices
Appendix A – Existing Traffic Counts and Traffic Signal Timing Sheets Appendix B – Existing Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix C – Existing plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix D – Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E – Cumulative plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix F – CCTA Methodology Traffix Software Intersections Level of Service Worksheets 809
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report summarizes the results of the Traffic Impact Analysis conducted for the proposed LMK Petro development (the project) on 1625 Buchanan Road in the City of Pittsburg, CA. The purpose of this traffic impact study is to evaluate the potential traffic impacts resulting from the development of the proposed project on the surrounding transportation system.

The proposed project proposes to replace the two existing 1,200 square feet buildings of on the project site with the construction of a 24-hour gas station consisting of 12 fueling positions with a convenience store and a self-service car wash. The convenience store will also have a restaurant with a drive through window. The type of restaurant will be determined by the project applicant at a later date. Proposed access to the site will be via two full access driveways on Buchanan Road.

The report also includes evaluations and recommendations concerning project site access and on-site circulation for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians; evaluation of on-site vehicle parking supply, passenger and commercial loading spaces and garbage/trash facilities, and queuing analysis at the driveway and at the study intersections.

To evaluate the impacts on the transportation infrastructure due to the addition of traffic from the proposed project, seven study intersections are evaluated during the weekday a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour under four study scenarios. The study intersections were evaluated under No Project and Plus Project scenarios for Existing and Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions.

Project Trip Generation
The proposed LMK Petro project is expected to generate 1,834 daily vehicular trips in which 84 vehicle trips are generated during the a.m. peak hour and 101 vehicle trips are generated during the p.m. peak hour.

Existing Conditions
Under this scenario, all the intersections operate within City of Pittsburg standards of mid-Level of Service (LOS) D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours except for the unsignalized intersection of Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road, which operates at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour.

Existing plus Project Conditions
Under this scenario, all the intersections operate within City of Pittsburg standards except for the intersection of Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Two-Way Stop Control), which operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour and LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. TJKM have conducted MUTCD Warrant 3, Peak Hour and Warrant 7, Crash Experience signal warrants, neither of which are satisfied for Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions. Therefore, this impact is considered insignificant.

Based on the City of Pittsburg LOS impact criteria, the proposed project will have a less-than-significant impact at the study intersections during both a.m. and p.m. peak hour. 810
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 2
Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions
Under this scenario, all the intersections operate within City of Pittsburg standards except the following intersections:
 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2) operates at LOS F during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
 Somersville Road and Buchanan Road (Intersection 5) operates at LOS E during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours.

Cumulative plus Project Conditions
Under this scenario, the same two intersections continue to operate at unacceptable levels of service.

The intersection of Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road, does not meet warrant for a traffic signal; therefore, this impact is considered insignificant.

Somersville Road and Buchanan Road (Intersection # 5) - The project is adding 33 trips during a.m. peak hour and 40 trips during p.m. peak hour. Therefore, this impact is insignificant as the project is adding less than 50 peak hour trips.

Based on the City of Pittsburg LOS impact criteria, the proposed project will have a less-than-significant impact at the study intersections during both a.m. and p.m. peak hour.

Queuing Analysis
The proposed project does not create a significant impact on the expected left-turn or right-turn queues at the selected study intersection under the Existing plus Project Conditions.

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Impacts
The proposed project does not conflict with existing and planned pedestrian or bicycle facilities. The transit service within the immediate vicinity of the project site operates well below capacity, and additional trips generated by the proposed project could be accommodated by existing bus services. Therefore the impacts, to pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities is less-than-significant. However, to accommodate all users of the street system and provide a complete and connected pedestrian facility between the project site and adjacent neighborhoods sidewalk should be provided on the project frontage.

On-Site Circulation
TJKM examined the project site plan in order to evaluate the adequacy of on-site vehicle circulation including refueling trucks, delivery trucks, and emergency vehicles. The proposed project’s access will be via two full access driveways on Buchanan Road. Based on the evaluation, the proposed on-site vehicle circulation is adequate and should not result in any significant traffic operations issues.

811
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 3
Parking
Based on the project site plan dated July 15, 2016 (Figure 2), a total of 29 parking spaces are provided for the LMK Petro project. Based on the City of Pittsburg Municipal Code the total parking required for the project is 15 parking stalls. Therefore, no parking impacts are projected on City streets. 812
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 4

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the traffic impact analysis for the proposed LMK Petro development (the project) on 1625 Buchanan Road in the City of Pittsburg, California. The analysis was conducted to evaluate the impacts of the project on the surrounding roadway system; to determine the project’s influence on the adjacent bicycle, pedestrian, and transit network; and to identify measures to mitigate any significant impacts. The study traffic impact analysis is prepared in accordance with the requirements and methodologies set forth by the City of Pittsburg, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), Caltrans, and the applicable provisions of CEQA. This chapter discusses the TIA purpose, the project study area, analysis scenarios and methods, and criteria used to identify significant impacts.

1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed LMK Petro project is located at 1625 Buchanan Road in the City of Pittsburg, CA. The project is located between the intersections of Buchanan Road/Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road/Meadows Avenue. The proposed project consists of a convenient store, gas station and a car wash.

The gas station will have twelve fueling positions. The car wash is self-serve. The convenience store will also house a restaurant with a drive through window. The type of restaurant will be determined by the owner at a later date. The project information was provided to TJKM by the City of Pittsburg staff. There are two existing 1,200 square feet buildings on the project site, which will be removed and replaced by the proposed project. Proposed access to the site will be via two full access driveways on Buchanan Road.

1.2 STUDY INTERSECTIONS
The TIA was conducted by evaluating the operations of the study intersections within the City of Pittsburg that the proposed project might potentially impact during the morning and evening commute periods, when traffic volumes on the surrounding streets are highest. TJKM evaluated traffic conditions at seven study intersections during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours on a typical weekday. The peak periods observed were between 7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m. The highest single one-hour period recorded for each peak period was used in the analysis. Study intersections were selected in consultation with the City of Pittsburg staff.

The following study intersections were analyzed (associated traffic controls in parentheses):

1. Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road (Signalized)

2. Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Un-Signalized)

3. Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road (Signalized)

4. Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road (Signalized)

5. Somersville Road and Buchanan Road (Signalized)

6. Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 1 (Un-Signalized)

7. Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 2 (Un-Signalized) Project impacts to pedestrian facilities, bicycle facilities, and transit service and facilities within the vicinity of project site were also addressed
813
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 5

1.3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
The study intersections were evaluated during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours for the following scenarios:

Scenario 1: Existing Conditions – This scenario evaluates all the study intersections based on existing traffic volumes, lane geometry and traffic controls.

Scenario 2: Existing plus Project Conditions – This scenario is identical to Existing Conditions, but with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed project.

Scenario 3: Cumulative No Project Conditions – This scenario includes year 2035 cumulative volumes obtained from the Tuscany Meadows final Environmental Impact Report dated July 2015 prepared by Raney Planning and Management, Inc. This scenario assumes completion of the James Donlon Boulevard Extension also.

Scenario 4: Cumulative plus Project Conditions – This scenario is identical to Cumulative Conditions, but with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed project.

Figure 1 shows the location of the project site, the surrounding transportation network, and study intersections. Figure 2 presents the proposed site plan. 814
Highlands
Ranch
Park
1 2 3 4 5
VENTURA DR.

VENTURA DR.

M
AE
OD . EVAS W

WOTYRTNEG D
N . R
E. LELAND RD.

N. PARK BLVD.

E. LELAND RD.

DELTA FAIR BLVD.

BUCHANAN RD. BUCHANAN RD.

WOODBOROUGH PL.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

LOVERIDGE RD.

X
Figure 1 057-054 - T2
Vicinity Map
LEGEND
Study Intersection
N
Project
Site

CAL FI ORNIA
4 6 7
SUZANNE DR.
815
Source: CVEAS Figure 2 057-054
Project Site Plan
N
816
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 8

1.4 STUDY METHODOLOGY
Existing operational conditions at the seven study intersections were evaluated according to the requirements set forth by the Contra Costa County Transportation Authority (CCTA) using the methodology set forth in the Technical Procedures (dated January 16, 2013). Analysis of traffic operations was conducted using the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Level of Service (LOS) methodology with Synchro 9.0 software. Level of service is an expression, in the form of a scale, of the relationship between the capacity of an intersection (or roadway segment) to accommodate the volume of traffic moving through it at any given time. The level of service scale describes traffic flow with six ratings ranging from A to F, with “A” indicating relatively free flow of traffic and “F” indicating stop-and go traffic characterized by traffic jams.

As the amount of traffic moving through a given intersection or roadway segment increases, the traffic flow conditions that motorists experience rapidly deteriorate as the capacity of the intersection or roadway segment is reached. Under such conditions, there is general instability in the traffic flow, which means that relatively small incidents (e.g., momentary engine stall) can cause considerable fluctuations in speeds and delays that lead to traffic congestion. This near-capacity situation is labeled level of service (LOS) E. Beyond LOS E, the intersection or roadway segment capacity has been exceeded, and arriving traffic will exceed the ability of the intersection to accommodate it.

It should be noted that the appendix includes a complete set of LOS calculations using the previous CCTA LOS methodology to allow a direct comparison of the results to the volume to capacity ratio (V/C) thresholds that are established in the City’s General Plan. The General Plan specifies a goal of maintaining a volume to capacity ratio less than or equal to 0.85 (with 0.95 permissible at intersections along Kirker Pass Road). The CCTA LOS results are included in the technical appendix to allow verification that the conclusions do not change when CCTALOS methodology is used instead of the HCM methodology adopted by the CCTA in January of 2013.

Signalized Intersections Analysis
The HCM methodology determines the capacity of each lane group approaching the intersection. The LOS is then based on average control delay (in seconds per vehicle) for the various movements within the intersection. A combined weighted average control delay and LOS are presented for the intersection.

Table 1 summarizes the relationship between Level of Service (LOS), average control delay, and the volume to capacity ratio at signalized intersections.

Unsignalized Intersections Analysis
The average control delay and LOS operating conditions are calculated by approach (e.g. northbound) and movement (e.g., northbound left-turn) for those movements that are subject to delay. In general, the operating conditions for unsignalized intersections are presented for the worst approach. Table 2 summarizes the relationship between LOS and average control delay at unsignalized intersections. 817
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 9
Table 1: Level of Service for Signalized Intersections
Level of
Service Description Average Delay (Sec/Veh)
Volume to Capacity
Ratio
A Insignificant Delays: No approach phase is fully used and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication.
<10 <0.60
B Minimal Delays: An occasional approach phase is fully used. Drivers begin to feel restricted.
>10 to 20 >0.61 to 0.70
C Acceptable Delays: Major approach phase may become
fully used. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted.
>20 to 35 >0.71 to 0.80
D
Tolerable Delays: Drivers may wait through no more than one red indication. Queues may develop but dissipate
rapidly without excessive delays.
>35 to 55 >0.81 to 0.90
E
Significant Delays: Volumes approaching capacity. Vehicles may wait through several signal cycles and long vehicle queues from upstream.
>55 to 80 >0.91 to 1.00
F
Excessive Delays: Represents conditions at capacity, with extremely long delays. Queues may block upstream
intersections.
>80 >1.00
Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2011. Technical Procedures Update, Contra Costa Transportation Authority, January 16, 2013.

Table 2: Level of Service for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Description of Operations Average Delay (seconds/vehicle)
A No delay for stop-controlled approaches 0 to 10
B Operations with minor delays >10 to 15
C Operations with moderate delays >15 to 25
D Operations with some delays >25 to 35
E Operations with high delays and long queues >35 to 50 F Operation with extreme congestion, with very high delays and long queues unacceptable to most drivers
>50
Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2011.

Traffic Signal Warrant Evaluation Methods
In order to determine whether traffic signals should be installed at currently unsignalized intersections, a supplemental traffic signal warrant analysis was also completed. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), dated November 2014 was used for this analysis. The term “signal warrants” refers to the list of established criteria used by Caltrans and other public agencies to quantitatively justify or ascertain the need for installation of a traffic signal at an unsignalized intersection location. The CAMUTCD signal warrant criteria are based upon several factors including volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, frequency and type of collisions, etc. CA-MUTCD indicates that “the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.” This 818
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 10
TIS evaluated CA-MUTCD based Peak-Hour-Volume-based Warrant 3 (Urban Areas) and Warrant 7 (Crash Experience) as a representative types of warrant analysis.

1.5 SIGNIFICANT IMPACT CRITERIA/LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS Existing policies, laws and regulations that apply to the proposed project are summarized below.

Contra Costa Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update (2009) - The transportation policies that are currently applicable within Contra Costa County are based on the Contra Costa County Comprehensive Transportation Plan. This document identifies the criteria for analyzing transportation impacts and sets forth plans for future roadway improvements in the county.

East County Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance (2009) – The Routes of Regional Significance system includes all portions of the Interstate and State highway systems, as well as major arterial roadways that serve the following function:
 The road connects two or more “regions” of the County  The road crosses county boundaries
 The road carries a significant amount of through-traffic (a threshold might be specified by the Regional Committee)
 The road provides access to a regional highway or transit facility (e.g. a BART station or freeway interchange)
Buchannan Road has been designated as a Route of Regional Significance.

City of Pittsburg General Plan - The Transportation and Circulation Element included in the City of Pittsburg General Plan was prepared pursuant to Section 65302(b) of the California Government Code.

The Transportation and Circulation Element addresses the location and extent of existing and planned transportation routes, terminals, and other local public utilities and facilities. The General Plan identifies roadway and transit goals and policies that have been adopted to ensure that the transportation system of the City will have adequate capacity to serve planned growth. These goals and policies are intended to provide a plan and implementation measures for an integrated, multi-modal transportation system that will safely and efficiently meet the transportation needs of all economic and social segments of the City.

Significance Criteria
The goal of the City of Pittsburg is to maintain a mid-Level of Service (LOS) D during the peak hours (volume to capacity ratio less than or equal to 0.85) with mid LOS E permissible at intersections along Kirker Pass Road, according to the General Plan. However, this analysis also includes the intersection of Somersville Road and Buchanan Road under the jurisdiction of the City of Antioch.

Table 3 summarizes the applicable LOS standards at each of the project study intersections. 819
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 11
Table 3: Intersection Level of Service Significance Criteria # Intersection Control

CCTALOS
Standards*
HCM Standards** MTSO
Standards***
V/C
Ratio LOS
V/C Ratio

LOS LOS
1 Loveridge Road and
Buchanan Road Signalized <0.85 Mid D <45 sec Mid D
2 Woodborough Place and
Buchanan Road
Two-Way
Stop
>0.90 D >35 sec D
3 Ventura Drive and
Buchanan Road Signalized <0.85 Mid D <45 sec Mid D
4 Meadows Avenue and
Buchanan Road Signalized Mid D
5 Somersville Road and
Buchanan Road Signalized <0.85 Mid D <45 sec Mid D
Notes:
* Previously adopted CCTA standards based on the CCTALOS Methodology. ** Currently adopted CCTA standards based on the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual Methodology. *** MTSO standards based on the East County Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance Note that both the older CCTALOS, currently adopted HCM standards and MTSO Standards are provided in Table 3. This is because the CCTA Technical Procedures specify that the HCM methodology shall be used unless it is being compared to a standard that was established using the previously adopted methodology, in which the CCTALOS method may be used. As the designated Congestion Management Agency (CMA) representing the jurisdictions of Contra Costa County, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (the Authority) is responsible for preparing and adopting a Congestion Management Program (CMP). Consistent with the CMP legislation, the Authority has established a level-of-service standard of LOS E for all parts of the CMP network except those that were already operating at worse levels of service in 1991. Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road (Intersection #4) under Traffic Management Program (TMP) and MTSO Level of Service Standards is designated as a TMP site as per East County Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance.

Signalized Intersections Project-related operational impacts on the City of Pittsburg’s signalized study intersections are considered significant, if project-related traffic causes the Level of Service (LOS) to deteriorate from Level of Service (LOS) mid D (V/C of 0.85) or better to high LOS D, LOS E, or F, or from LOS E to LOS F.

Unsignalized Intersections Project-related operational impacts on unsignalized intersections in Pittsburg are considered significant if project generated traffic causes the worst-case movement (or average of all movements for all-way stop-controlled intersections and roundabouts) to deteriorate from LOS D or better to LOS E or F.
820
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 12
CEQA Guidelines
According to CEQA guidelines, a project would have a significant impact if it would:
 Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including, but not limited to, intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit.
 Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, levelof-service standards, and travel demand measures, or other standards established by a county congestion management agency for designated roadways.
 Result in inadequate emergency vehicle access.
 Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities.  Result in a projected future over-capacity freeway condition where current long-range planning studies show an under-capacity condition.
 Result in an internal circulation system design that does not meet City standards. 821
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 13

2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section describes existing conditions in the immediate project site vicinity, including roadway facilities, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and available transit service. In addition, existing traffic volumes and operations are presented for all the study intersections, including the results of LOS calculations.

2.1 EXISTING SETTING AND ROADWAY SYSTEM
Routes of Regional Significance – Routes of Regional Significance (RRS) are major roadway and freeway corridors that serve regional traffic. These are identified in Action Plans adopted by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority under the countywide Measure J program. State Route 4, Kirker Pass Road, Railroad Avenue, E. Leland Road, Delta Fair Boulevard, Buchanan Road, Somersville Boulevard, Auto Center Drive, James Donlon Boulevard, Lone Tree Way, and Ygnacio Valley Road are all identified as Routes of Regional Significance (RRS) in the East County Action Plan.

As discussed previously, the project location and the surrounding roadway network are illustrated in Figure 1. The following is a more detailed description of the Routes of Regional Significance within the project vicinity.

State Route 4 (SR 4)/SR Bypass is the primary east-west corridor in Contra Costa County. It connects Interstate 80 in the city of Hercules to the west with SR 160 and the cities of Oakley and Brentwood to the east. SR 4 is currently a two-lane roadway through Brentwood and is a divided freeway from Interstate 680 east through Concord, Pittsburg, and Antioch. It should be noted that the State Route 4 Bypass has been completed in Antioch and Brentwood providing an alternative to SR 4 in these cities. Interchanges along SR 4 within the study area include Railroad Avenue, Loveridge Road, and Somersville Road.

Kirker Pass Road/Ygnacio Valley Road is a north-south roadway that runs between Buchanan Road in Pittsburg and Clayton Road in Concord. In the Pittsburg 2020 General Plan, Kirker Pass Road is identified as a major arterial. It has four lanes with a 55 mph speed limit and is divided by medians and barriers along most of its length. In the City of Concord, it transitions into a six-lane roadway with a 45 mph speed limit and turns into Ygnacio Valley Road at Clayton Road.

Buchanan Road is an east-west roadway that runs between Contra Loma Boulevard and Railroad Avenue.

Within the project vicinity, Buchanan Road has two lanes with a center turning lane with additional capacity at intersections to accommodate high volumes of turning vehicles. Class II bike lanes and sidewalks are present along both sides of Buchanan Road. In the City of Pittsburg 2020 General Plan, Buchanan Road is identified as a major arterial. The posted speed limit of 35 to 45 mph within the project vicinity. This roadway provides access to residential and commercial/retail areas. Buchanan Road is directly accessible to the project site. As per the Draft final East County Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance dated March 2014, Buchanan Road will no longer be designated as a Route of Regional Significance once the James Donlon Boulevard extension is constructed.

Railroad Avenue is a north-south roadway with a 20 to 35 mph speed limit that starts at 3rd Street and ends at Buchanan Road where it turns into Kirker Pass Road. Railroad Avenue has two lanes north of W. 822
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 14
10th Street and becomes a four-lane major arterial south of W. 10th St, as identified in the Pittsburg 2020 General Plan.

Somersville Road is a north-south roadway that runs from Century Boulevard to Oil Canyon Road. In Pittsburg 2020 General Plan, Somersville Road is identified as a major arterial from Century Boulevard to James Donlon Boulevard, with four lanes and this roadway has two lanes from James Donlon Boulevard to Contra Costa Canal. This two-lane section is planned to be expanded to four lanes in future. South of James Donlon Boulevard, Somersville Road provides access to the Black Diamond Mines Regional Park.

This roadway is located entirely outside the Pittsburg City Limits. Sidewalks are provided on both the sides of roadway where land uses have been developed adjacent to the roadway. It has posted speed limit of 35 to 45 mph within the vicinity of project site. This roadway provides access to residential and commercial/retail areas. Somersville Road is accessible to the project site via Buchanan Road.

Local Roadways – There are also a number of local roadways that were included in the analysis including the following:

James Donlon Boulevard is an east-west roadway with a 40 mph speed limit that begins west of Somersville Road and ends at Lone Tree Way. This roadway is a four-lane arterial divided by raised medians. It is currently planned to be extended west to Kirker Pass Road under cumulative build-out conditions.

Loveridge Road is a north-south roadway that runs between Pittsburg Waterfront Road and Buchanan Road. Within the vicinity of project site, Loveridge Road is a four lane major arterial roadway with raised medians, bike lanes, and sidewalks on both the sides of roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 mph within the project vicinity. This roadway provides access to residential and commercial/retail areas. Loveridge Road is accessible to the project site via Buchanan Road.

Ventura Drive is a two-lane north-south roadway that runs between Harbor Street and Canyon Oaks Circle. Within the vicinity of project site, Ventura Drive has two lanes with one travel lane in each direction.

Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 mph within the project vicinity. This roadway provides access to residential areas. Ventura Drive is accessible to the project site via Buchanan Road.

Meadows Avenue is a two-lane north-south residential roadway that runs between Heatherwood Drive and Ventura Drive. Within the vicinity of project site, Meadows Avenue has two lanes with one travel lane in each direction. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 mph within the project vicinity. This roadway provides access to residential areas. Meadows Avenue is accessible to the project site via Buchanan Road.

Woodborough Place is a two-lane residential roadway and has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. This roadway provides access to residential areas.

Woodborough Place is accessible to the project site via Buchanan Road. 823
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 15

2.2 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Walkability is defined as the ability to travel easily and safely between various origins and destinations without having to rely on automobiles or other motorized travel. The ideal “walkable” community includes wide sidewalks, a mix of land uses such as residential, employment, and shopping opportunities, a limited number of conflict points with vehicle traffic, and easy access to transit facilities and services.

Pedestrian facilities consist of crosswalks, sidewalks, pedestrian signals, and off-street paths, which provide safe and convenient routes for pedestrians to access the destinations such as institutions, businesses, public transportation, and recreation facilities.

Within the vicinity of the project site, most of the intersections are signalized and equipped with countdown pedestrian signal heads. Sidewalks are provided along most of the roadways, where land uses have been developed adjacent to the roadway. Sidewalks and crosswalks are found along virtually all previously-described local roadways in the study area. All the existing sidewalks are approximately 5 to 10 feet wide varying within the vicinity of project site. Sidewalks are proposed on the east side of Buchanan Road along the project frontage.

There are two bus stops within 500 feet walking distance of the project site. There is one transit stop located east of the intersection of Buchanan Road and Meadows Avenue and another transit stop located west of the intersection of Buchanan Road and Ventura Drive. All the bus stops are located on Buchanan Road. All the bus stops are accessible to and from the project site via existing sidewalks and crosswalks along Buchanan Road.

The existing pedestrian facilities in the study area are shown in Figure 3.

2.3 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES
Bicycle paths, lanes and routes are typical examples of bicycle transportation facilities, which are defined by Caltrans as being in one of the following three classes:

Class I – Provides a completely separated facility designed for the exclusive use of bicyclists and pedestrians with crossing points minimized.

Class II – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated lane for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and cross-flows by pedestrians and motorists permitted.

Class III – Provides a route designated by signs or pavement markings and shared with pedestrians and motorists.

As per City of Pittsburg General Plan, the existing bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the project area are described below:
 Delta De Anza multi-use trail (i.e. Class I trails) run within the City of Pittsburg.  Buchanan Road - Existing Class II bike lanes that run from Somersville Road to Rail Road Avenue along both the sides of roadway.
824
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 16
 Somersville Road - Existing Class II bike lanes that run from Creek Side Drive to James Donlon Boulevard along both the sides of roadway.
 Loveridge Road - Existing Class II bike lanes that run from E. Leland Road to Buchanan Road and along both the sides of roadway.

As per Pittsburg General Plan, the proposed bicycle network in the city of Pittsburg:
 Multi-use trails (i.e. Class I trails) are proposed parallel to Ventura Drive within the City of Pittsburg.
 Multi-use trails (i.e. Class I trails) are proposed parallel to Buchanan Road within the City of Pittsburg.
 Class II bicycle lanes are proposed on Somersville Road between Buchanan Road to Creekside Drive.

The Bicycle facilities in the study area are shown in Figure 4.

2.4 EXISTING TRANSIT FACILITIES
Three major public mass transit operators provide service within the City of Pittsburg. These include BART, the Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority (or Tri Delta Transit), and the County Connection. These operators are described below.

Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) – BART is a rapid mass transit system which provides regional transportation connections to much of the Bay Area. It runs from the North Bay Area in Richmond to the South Bay Area in Fremont. In the east-west direction, it runs from Pittsburg to the San Francisco Airport and Millbrae with several connections in Oakland. The Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station serves Pittsburg, Bay Point, Antioch, and all other surrounding cities and runs from 4:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. daily, with a weekday frequency of 15 minutes. A future E-BART extension to Hillcrest Avenue in Antioch is currently under construction. This service will connect with BART at the Bay Point BART station.

Tri Delta Transit - Tri Delta Transit serves the East County including Brentwood, Oakley, Pittsburg, Antioch, Bay Point and distinct areas of East County. Tri Delta Transit operates 14 local bus routes from Monday to Friday, including three express services, and three local bus routes during weekends and Holidays. The Tri Delta Transit runs within the vicinity of project area are Route #380, Route #390, and Route #393. Route #390 has bus stops along Buchanan Road, approximately 500 feet from the project site.

County Connection Transit – The County Connection currently operates a total of 31 fixed route bus routes on weekdays throughout Central Contra Costa County with limited service to the East County area.

The route that serves the East County area is Route #93X. This is an express route that runs from the Hillcrest Park ‘N’ Ride in Antioch, along Kirker Pass Road, along Ygnacio Valley Road, and ends at the Walnut Creek BART station. This route has a frequency of 30 minutes and runs from 4:35 a.m. to 7:45 p.m. during the weekdays. Currently, the bus stop for Route #93X on Buchanan Road within the vicinity of project site is approximately 500 feet from the site.
825
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 17
The existing transit facilities are shown in Figure 5, and Table 4 describes the services, and frequency of the transit services during the week and weekend.

Table 4: Existing Transit Services
Route
#
From To
Weekdays Weekend
Operating
Hours1
Headway
(minutes)2
Operating
Hours1
Headway
(minutes)2
380 Pittsburg/Bay Point
BART Tri Delta Transit
3:05 a.m. –
11:35 p.m.
30-60 … …
390 Pittsburg/Bay Point
BART
Hillcrest Park and
Ride
3:50 a.m. –
8:30 p.m.
25 - 60 … …
393 Mariners
Cove/Pacifica
Brentwood Park and
Ride 5:20 a.m. -1:40 a.m.
60 93X
BART Walnut Creek Hillcrest Park and
Ride
4:35 a.m. –
8:25 a.m. 30 … …
Hillcrest Park and
Ride BART Walnut Creek 3:05 p.m. – 7:45 p.m.
60 … …
Source: www.trideltatransit.com 1
. Operating hours rounded to the nearest 5-minute interval. 2 . Headways are defined as the time interval between two transit vehicles travelling in the same direction over the same route. 826
Highlands
Ranch
Park
1 2 3 4 5
VENTURA DR.

VENTURA DR.

M
AE
OD . EVAS W

WOTYRTNEG D
N . R
E. LELAND RD.

N. PARK BLVD.

E. LELAND RD.

DELTA FAIR BLVD.

BUCHANAN RD. BUCHANAN RD.

WOODBOROUGH PL.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

LOVERIDGE RD.

X
Figure 3 057-054 - T2
Existing Pedestrian Facilities
LEGEND
Study Intersection
Existing Crosswalk
Existing Sidewalk
N
Project
Site

CAL FI ORNIA
4 6 7
SUZANNE DR.
827
Highlands
Ranch
Park
1 2 3 4 5
VENTURA DR.

VENTURA DR.

M
AE
OD . EVAS W

WOTYRTNEG D
N . R
E. LELAND RD.

N. PARK BLVD.

E. LELAND RD.

DELTA FAIR BLVD.

BUCHANAN RD.

WOODBOROUGH PL.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

LOVERIDGE RD.

X
Figure 4 057-054 - T2
Bicycle Facilities
LEGEND
Study Intersection
Class II Bike Lane
Class I Bike Trail
Proposed Class II Bike Lane
Proposed Class I Bike Trail
N
Project
Site

CAL FI ORNIA
4 6 7
OR Path
n 1
Optio
Path
Option 2 BUCHANAN RD.

SUZANNE DR.
828
Highlands
Ranch
Park
1 2 3 4 5
VENTURA DR.

VENTURA DR.

M
AE
OD . EVAS W

WOTYRTNEG D
N . R
E. LELAND RD.

N. PARK BLVD.

E. LELAND RD.

DELTA FAIR BLVD.

BUCHANAN RD.

WOODBOROUGH PL.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

LOVERIDGE RD.

X
Figure 5 057-054 - T2
Existing Transit Facilities
LEGEND
Study Intersection
Bus Stop
390
380
393
Route 93 X
N
Project
Site

CAL FI ORNIA
4 6 7
SUZANNE DR.
829
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 21

2.5 EXISTING INTERSECTION VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS The existing operations of the study intersections were evaluated for the highest one-hour volume during the weekday morning and evening peak periods. Turning movement counts for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians were collected during weekday a.m. and p.m. peak periods at the study intersections on Tuesday, November 15th, 2016. Appendix A includes all the data sheets for the collected vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian counts. Figure 6 illustrates the existing lane geometry and traffic control at the study intersections. Figure 7 illustrates the existing conditions peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections.

2.6 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing intersection lane configurations and peak hour turning movement volumes were used to calculate the levels of service for the study intersections during each peak hour. The City of Pittsburg provided signal timings for the study intersections. The peak hour factor based on the counts was used for all study intersections for the existing conditions analysis.

The study intersections were analyzed using the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) methodology by using Synchro 9.0 software program. The results of the Level of Service (LOS) analysis using the Synchro 9.0 software program for Existing Conditions are summarized in Table 5. Appendix B contains the corresponding calculation sheets. Under this scenario, all the intersections operate within City of Pittsburg standards mid- Level of Service (LOS) D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour except the unsignalized intersection of Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2) operates at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour.

Table 5: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions # Intersection Control Peak
Hour1
Existing Conditions
Average
Delay2 LOS3
1 Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 29.9 C PM 18.5 B
2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road Two-Way Stop AM 34.7 D PM 80.3 F
3 Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 11.8 B
PM 13.4 B
4 Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 11.3 B PM 16.1 B
5 Somersville Road and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 39.2 D PM 32.1 C
Notes:
1 AM – morning peak hour (between 7 and 9 a.m.), PM – evening peak hour (between 4 and 6 p.m.) 2 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections. 3 LOS – Level of Service calculations conducted using the Synchro 9.0 level of service analysis software package, which applies the methodology described in the HCM 2010.

Bold text indicates intersection operates at a deficient Level of Service.

830
VENTURA DR.

VENTURA DR.

MEADOWS AVE.

GENTRYTOWN DR.

E. LELAND RD.

N. PARK BLVD.

E. LELAND RD.

DELTA FAIR BLVD.

BUCHANAN RD. BUCHANAN RD.

WOODBOROUGH PL.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

LOVERIDGE RD.

Highlands
Ranch
Park
X
1 2 3 4 5
Intersection #1
Loveridge Rd./
Buchanan Rd
Intersection #2
Woodborough Pl./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #3
Ventura Dr./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #4
Meadows Ave./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #5
Somersville Rd./
Buchanan Rd.

Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls
057-054 - T2 Figure 6
N
LEGEND
Study Intersection
Traffic Signal
Stop Sign
Buchanan Rd.

Loveridge Rd.

Buchanan Rd.

Woodborough Pl.

Buchanan Rd.

Ventura Dr.

Buchanan Rd.

Meadows Ave.

Buchanan Rd.

Somersville Rd.

Project
Site

CALIFORNIA
4 6 7
SUZANNE DR.
831
VENTURA DR.

VENTURA DR.

MEADOWS AVE.

GENTRYTOWN DR.

E. LELAND RD.

N. PARK BLVD.

E. LELAND RD.

DELTA FAIR BLVD.

BUCHANAN RD. BUCHANAN RD.

WOODBOROUGH PL.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

LOVERIDGE RD.

Highlands
Ranch
Park
X
1 2 3 4 5
Intersection #1
Loveridge Rd./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #2
Woodborough Pl./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #3
Ventura Dr./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #4
Meadows Ave./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #5
Somersville Rd./
Buchanan Rd.

Existing Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
057-054 - T2 Figure 7
N
LEGEND
Study Intersection
AM Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
XX
(XX)
3 (8)4 (23)9 (24)4 (37)12 (43)
20 (34)3 (2)22 (34)
164 (263)155 (436)49 (145)
285 (307)160 (235)
7 (19)
697 (441)
22 (27)
21 (29)
650 (404)
29 (61)
118 (86)
257 (144)
803 (538) 28 (30)
1 (2)
194 (183)
587 (359)
103 (84)
47 (13)38 (40)
46 (35)
1 (0)
52 (43)
321 (168)398 (215)
11 (12)
13 (6)
4 (2)
8 (12)
436 (890)
82 (134)
15 (31)
441 (901)
47 (47)
241 (311)
148 (318)
178 (424)
511 (994)
8 (11)
287 (186)
399 (773)
Buchanan Rd.

Loveridge Rd.

Buchanan Rd.

Woodborough Pl.

Buchanan Rd.

Ventura Dr.

Buchanan Rd.

Meadows Ave.

Buchanan Rd.

Somersville Rd.

Project
Site

CALIFORNIA
4 6 7
SUZANNE DR.
832
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 24

3.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
The impacts of the proposed project on the transportation system are discussed in this chapter. First, the method used to estimate the amount of traffic generated by the project is described. Then, the results of the level of service calculations for Existing plus Project Conditions are presented. (Existing plus Project Conditions is defined as Existing Conditions plus traffic generated by the proposed project). A comparison of intersections under Existing plus Project Conditions and Existing Conditions is presented and the impacts of the project on the study intersections are discussed.

The amount of traffic added to the roadway system by the proposed development is estimated using a three-step process.
 Trip Generation – Estimates the amount of traffic added to the roadway network,  Trip Distribution – Estimates the direction of travel to and from the project site,  Trip Assignment – The new trips are assigned to specific street segments and intersection turning movements.

3.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
TJKM developed estimated project trip generation for the proposed project based on published trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation (9th Edition).TJKM used trip rates for the ITE land use Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash (ITE Code 946) for this project. For purposes of forecasting net peak hour trips, TJKM applied 40 percent pass-by trip reduction for conservative analysis, as the type of restaurant that will be in the convenience store is not known at this time.

Pass-by trips are made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination without a route diversion. Pass by trips account for trips that are already on the roadway but will stop/divert to the new development on their way to their final destinations. Pass by trips are attracted from traffic passing the site on an adjacent street or roadway that offers direct access to the generator.

Pass by trips are not diverted from another roadway.

Table 6 shows the trip generation expected to be generated by the proposed project. The proposed project is expected to generate 1,834 daily vehicular trips in which 84 vehicle trips (43 inbound and 42 outbound) are generated during the a.m. peak hour and 101 vehicle trips (51 inbound and 50 outbound) are generated during the p.m. peak hour.

3.2 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
Trip distribution is a process that determines in what proportion vehicles would be expected to travel between the project site and various destinations outside the project study area. Assignment determines the various routes that vehicles would take from the project site to each destination using the calculated trip distribution. Trip distribution assumptions for the proposed project were developed based on the existing travel patterns, knowledge of the study area and consultation with the City of Pittsburg staff. The trip distribution patterns are shown on Figure 8.
833
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 25
Table 6: Proposed Project Trip Generation
Land Use (ITE Code) Size Unit
Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Rate Trips Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Gasoline/Service
Station with
Convenience Market
and Carwash (946)
12 FP 152.84 1,834 11.84 51:49 72 70 142 13.86 51:49 85 82 167 Pass-by Trip Discount
for Gasoline/Service
Station with
Convenience Market1
-40% -29 -28 -57 -40% -34 -32 -66
Net Trips 1,834 43 42 85 51 50 101
Notes: Source - Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012; ¹For a conservative approach 40 percent Pass-by trip discount is applied The distribution assumptions are as follows:
 5 percent to/from Ventura Drive north of Buchanan Road  5 percent to/from Ventura Drive south of Buchanan Road  5 percent to/from Meadows Avenue south of Buchanan Road  8 percent to/from Meadows Avenue north of Buchanan Road  10 percent to/from Somersville Road south of Buchanan Road  10 percent to/from east of Buchanan Road
 12 percent to/from Loveridge Road north of Buchanan Road  20 percent to/from Somersville Road north of Buchanan Road  25 percent to/from west of Buchanan Road
Project trips were assigned to the roadway network based on the trip distribution patterns discussed above. Figure 8 illustrates the a.m. and p.m. peak hour project trips assigned to each turning movement at the study intersections. The assigned project trips were then added to traffic volumes under Existing Conditions to generate Existing plus project Conditions traffic volumes. 834
VENTURA DR.

VENTURA DR.

MEADOWS AVE.

GENTRYTOWN DR.

E. LELAND RD.

N. PARK BLVD.

E. LELAND RD.

DELTA FAIR BLVD.

BUCHANAN RD. BUCHANAN RD.

WOODBOROUGH PL.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

LOVERIDGE RD.

Highlands
Ranch
Park
X
1 2 3 4 5
6 7
Intersection #1
Loveridge Rd./
Buchanan Rd
Intersection #2
Woodborough Pl./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #6
Buchanan Rd./
Driveway 1
Intersection #7
Buchanan Rd./
Driveway 2
Intersection #3
Ventura Dr./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #4
Meadows Ave./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #5
Somersville Rd./
Buchanan Rd.

Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
057-054 - T2 Figure 8
N
LEGEND
Study Intersection
AM Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
Trip Distribution
XX
(XX)
XX%
8 (10)9 (10)
2 (3)
4 (4)
9 (10)
5 (6)
2 (3)
16 (19)
2 (2) 16 (19) 17 (20) 4 (5)
5 (6)
11 (13)
2 (3)
2 (2)
4 (5)
16 (19) 4 (4)
16 (20)
2 (2)
8 (10)
4 (5)
4 (5)
16 (19)
11 (13)
14 (16)
8 (10)
12 (14)13 (16)
9 (10)
12 (15)
Lorem ipsum
12%
5%
5%
8%
5%
20%
10%
25%
10%
Buchanan Rd.

Loveridge Rd.

Buchanan Rd.

Driveway 1
Buchanan Rd.

Driveway 2
Buchanan Rd.

Woodborough Pl.

Buchanan Rd.

Ventura Dr.

Buchanan Rd.

Meadows Ave.

Buchanan Rd.

Somersville Rd.

Project
Site

CALIFORNIA
4 SUZANNE DR.
835
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 27

3.3 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Intersection levels of service were calculated with the new traffic added by the proposed project to existing volumes to evaluate the operating conditions of the intersections and identify potential impacts to the roadway system. The results of the intersection level of service calculations for Existing plus Project Conditions are presented in Table 7. Appendix C contains the corresponding calculation sheets. The results for Existing Conditions are included for comparison purpose, along with the projected increases in delay. The changes in delay between Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions are used to identify significant impacts. Figure 9 shows projected turning movement volumes at the study intersections for Existing plus Project Conditions.

Under this scenario, all the intersections operate within City of Pittsburg standards or better during the both a.m. and p.m. peak hours except the unsignalized intersection of Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2) which operates at LOS E during a.m. peak hour and LOS F during p.m. peak hour.

Table 7: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Conditions # Intersection Control Peak
Hour1
Existing
Conditions
Existing with
Project
Conditions
Change
in
Delay4
Delay (Sec) 2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3
1 Loveridge Road and Buchanan
Road Signalized AM 29.9 C 30.4 C 0.50
PM 18.5 B 18.9 B 0.40
2 Woodborough Place and
Buchanan Road
Two-Way
Stop
AM 34.7 D 36.5 E 1.80
PM 80.3 F 87.7 F 7.40
3 Ventura Drive and Buchanan
Road Signalized AM 11.8 B 12.0 B 0.20
PM 13.4 B 13.7 B 0.30
4 Meadows Avenue and Buchanan
Road Signalized
AM 11.3 B 11.6 B 0.30
PM 16.1 B 17.0 B 0.90
5 Somersville Road and Buchanan
Road Signalized AM 39.2 D 41.3 D 2.10
PM 32.1 C 33.4 C 1.30
6 Buchanan Road and Project
Driveway 1
One-Way
Stop

AM N/A N/A

22.7 C …
PM 27.7 D …
7 Buchanan Road and Project
Driveway 2
One-Way
Stop

AM N/A N/A

23.3 C …
PM 30.9 D …
Notes:
1 AM – morning peak hour (between 7 and 9 a.m.), PM – evening peak hour (between 4 and 6 p.m.) 2 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections. ³ LOS – Level of Service calculations conducted using the Synchro 9.0 level of service analysis software package, which applies the methodology described in the HCM 2010. 4
Change in delay between Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions.

Bold text indicates intersection operates at a deficient Level of Service.

The peak-hour signal warrant from the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) was evaluated for the unsignalized intersection Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2), which operates at unacceptable LOS under Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions to determine if a traffic signal is warranted. The unsignalized intersection does not meet CA MUTCD peak hour signal warrant in either the a.m. or p.m. peak hours under Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions. MUTCD peak hour signal warrants sheets for Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions are contained in 836
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 28
Appendix C. It should be noted that for the unsignalized intersection of Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2), the major street (Buchanan Road) volumes are very high on both approaches, so on the minor street (Woodborough Place) there are insufficient gaps. In particular, the left turn movement experience long wait times at this intersection. Hence, the minor street approaches experience higher delays. Thus, the LOS F operations only apply to the Woodborough Place southbound approach, which has very low volumes in both a.m. and p.m. peak hours.

The reported vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian collisions at the unsignalized intersection of Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2) were obtained from the City of Pittsburg staff. There have been two collisions for the two year period from January 1st, 2014 to December 31st, 2015 with one being broadside and other one rear end collision. MUTCD Warrant 7, Crash Experience requires five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal, to have occurred within a 12-month period, for this warrant to be satisfied. Based on the review of the collisions, this warrant is not satisfied. Collision data is attached in Appendix C.

Therefore, at Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road with available data, TJKM has conducted analysis of MUTCD Warrant 3, Peak Hour and Warrant 7, Crash Experience. Signal warrants are not satisfied.

Therefore, this impact is considered insignificant.

Based on the City of Pittsburg impact criteria the project is expected to have a less-than-significant impact at all the study intersections.
837
VENTURA DR.

VENTURA DR.

MEADOWS AVE.

GENTRYTOWN DR.

E. LELAND RD.

N. PARK BLVD.

E. LELAND RD.

DELTA FAIR BLVD.

BUCHANAN RD. BUCHANAN RD.

WOODBOROUGH PL.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

LOVERIDGE RD.

Highlands
Ranch
Park
X
1 2 3 4 5
6 7
Intersection #1
Loveridge Rd./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #2
Woodborough Pl./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #3
Ventura Dr./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #4
Meadows Ave./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #5
Somersville Rd./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #6
Driveway 1/
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #7
Driveway 2/
Buchanan Rd.

Existing plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 057-054 - T2 Figure 9

N LEGEND
Study Intersection
AM Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
XX
(XX)
3 (8)4 (23)9 (24)4 (37)14 (46)
24 (38)3 (2)22 (34)
173 (273)155 (436)49 (145)
285 (307)165 (241)
9 (22)
713 (460)
24 (29)
21 (29)
667 (424)
29 (61)
118 (86)
261 (149)
819 (557) 28 (30)
1 (2)
199 (189)
598 (372)
103 (84)
47 (13)40 (43)
48 (37)
1 (0)
52 (43)
325 (173)398 (215)
11 (12)
13 (6)
4 (2)
8 (12)
452 (909)
82 (134)
19 (35)
457 (921)
49 (49)
249 (321)
152 (323)
182 (429)
527 (1,013)
8 (11)
287 (186)
410 (786) 8 (10) 9 (10)
14 (16)
725 (483)
8 (10)
499 (989)
12 (14)13 (16)
9 (10)
724 (483)
12 (15)
494 (983)
Buchanan Rd.

Loveridge Rd.

Buchanan Rd.

Driveway 1
Buchanan Rd.

Driveway 2
Buchanan Rd.

Woodborough Pl.

Buchanan Rd.

Ventura Dr.

Buchanan Rd.

Meadows Ave.

Buchanan Rd.

Somersville Rd.

Project
Site

CALIFORNIA
4 SUZANNE DR.
838
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 30

3.4 QUEUING ANALYSIS AT THE SELECTED STUDY INTERSECTIONS – EXISTING PLUS PROJECT

CONDITIONS
TJKM conducted a vehicle queuing and storage analysis for all exclusive left and right turn pockets at study intersections where project traffic is added under Existing plus Project Conditions. The 95th percentile (maximum) queues were analyzed using the HCM 2010 Queue methodology contained in Synchro 9.0 software for the exclusive left turn/right turn pockets at the study intersections. Detailed calculations are included in the LOS appendices corresponding to each analysis scenario. Table 8 summarizes the 95th percentile queue lengths at the study intersections under Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions scenarios. It should be noted that queue lengths at some locations exceed capacity creating a deficient condition, however, the project would add less than two vehicles to the average queue length. The proposed project does not create a significant impact by itself on the expected leftturn or right-turn queues at the study intersections.

Table 8: 95th Percentile Queues – Existing plus Project Conditions # Intersection Lane
Group
Storage
Length per
lane
Existing
Conditions
Existing plus
Project
Conditions
Change

AM PM AM PM AM PM
1 Loveridge Road and
Buchanan Road
EBL 220 340 170 340 170 0 0
WBR 70 100 80 100 90 0 10
SBL 250 160 210 170 220 10 10
SBR 250 70 70 70 70 0 0
2 Woodborough Place
and Buchanan Road
WBL 120 0 0 0 0 0 0
NBLTR 115 30 30 30 30 0 0
SBL 30 30 80 30 80 0 0
SBR 30 30 30 30 30 0 0
3 Ventura Drive and
Buchanan Road
EBL 150 30 30 30 30 0 0
EBR 45 40 50 40 50 0 0
WBL 160 40 60 50 60 10 0
NBL 85 110 130 120 130 10 0
SBL 90 30 70 30 80 0 10
4 Meadows Avenue
and Buchanan Road
EBL 155 30 40 40 50 10 10
EBR 75 10 10 10 10 0 0
WBL 210 50 70 50 70 0 0
NBL 100 50 50 50 50 0 0
SBL 105 30 50 30 50 0 0
5 Somersville Road and
Buchanan Road
EBL 525 340 400 360 440 20 40
EBR 260 50 80 50 80 0 0
WBL 120 70 70 70 70 0 0
WBR 185 60 30 60 30 0 0
NBL 455 440 240 450 250 10 10
SBL 165 100 220 100 220 0 0
Notes: Storage length and 95th percentile queue is expressed in feet per lane Queue length is rounded to nearest ten feet.
839
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 31

3.5 QUEUING AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS AT PROJECT DRIVEWAY TJKM conducted a vehicle queuing and LOS analysis at the proposed project driveway on Buchanan Road.

The 95th percentile (maximum) queues were analyzed using the HCM 2010 Queue methodology contained in Synchro 9.0 software for the project driveway. As shown in Table 9, under Existing plus Project Conditions, the project driveway is expected to operate at an acceptable level of service. In addition, the 95th percentile queueing at the outbound approach of the project driveway is expected to be minimal.

Table 9: 95th Percentile Queues and Level of Service at Project Driveways Intersection
Existing Plus Project Conditions
#
AM PM
Delay1 LOS2
95th
percentile
Queue3
(feet)
Delay1 LOS2
95th
percentile
Queue3
(feet)
6 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 1 22.7 C 0.3 27.7 D 0.4 7 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 2 23.3 C 0.4 30.9 D 0.7 Notes:
1 Delay = Average control delay in seconds per vehicle
2 LOS = Level of Service
³ Reported values of 95th percentile Queues are for the outbound movements at the project driveways 840
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 32

4.0 CUMULATIVE (YEAR 2035) CONDITIONS
This chapter presents the results of the level of service calculations under Cumulative Conditions without the project. Cumulative No Project Conditions are defined as conditions that occurs within the next 19 years (Year 2035). Level of service analysis at the study intersections was conducted for this scenario to establish a base to evaluate the impacts due to the addition of traffic from the proposed project. The Cumulative Conditions volumes were obtained from the Tuscany Meadows final Environmental Impact Report dated July 2015 prepared by Raney Planning and Management, Inc. It was observed in the report that the cumulative plus project conditions include year 2035 cumulative volumes based on the most recent release of the Countywide Travel Demand Model plus the trips from the proposed Tuscan Meadows residential project and also assumes completion of the James Donlon Boulevard Extension.

Figure 10 shows turning movement volumes at all the study intersections for Cumulative Conditions.

Optimized signal timings and a peak hour factor of 1.0 was used for all the study intersections for Cumulative Conditions analysis. Lane geometries and traffic controls are assumed to be identical to those under Existing Conditions except for the intersection of Somersville Road and Buchanan Road (Intersection #5) where an exclusive southbound right turn lane is added in future.

4.1 INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – CUMULATIVE (YEAR 2035) CONDITIONS The intersection LOS analysis results for Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions are summarized in Table 10.

Detailed calculation sheets for Cumulative Conditions are contained in Appendix D. Under this scenario, all the intersections operate within City of Pittsburg during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours except for the following intersections.
 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2) operates at LOS F during the both a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hours.
 Somersville Road and Buchanan Road (Intersection 5) operates at LOS E during the both a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hours.
841
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 33
Table 10: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions # Intersection Control Peak
Hour1
Cumulative
(Year 2035)
Conditions
Average
Delay2 LOS3
1 Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 34.1 C PM 19.6 B
2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road Two-Way Stop AM 56.8 F PM 95.2 F
3 Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 20.1 C
PM 37.0 D
4 Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 12.0 B PM 27.1 C
5 Somersville Road and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 57.9 E PM 61.5 E
Notes:
1 AM – morning peak hour (between 7 and 9 a.m.), PM – evening peak hour (between 4 and 6 p.m.) 2 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections. ³ LOS – Level of Service calculations conducted using the Synchro 9.0 level of service analysis software package, which applies the methodology described in the HCM 2010.

Bold text indicates intersection operates at a deficient Level of Service.

842
VENTURA DR.

VENTURA DR.

MEADOWS AVE.

GENTRYTOWN DR.

E. LELAND RD.

N. PARK BLVD.

E. LELAND RD.

DELTA FAIR BLVD.

BUCHANAN RD. BUCHANAN RD.

WOODBOROUGH PL.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

LOVERIDGE RD.

Highlands
Ranch
Park
X
1 2 3 4 5
Intersection #1
Loveridge Rd./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #2
Woodborough Pl./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #3
Ventura Dr./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #4
Meadows Ave./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #5
Somersville Rd./
Buchanan Rd.

Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 057-054 - T2 Figure 10

N LEGEND
Study Intersection
AM Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
XX
(XX)
4 (10)5 (28)19 (18)11 (104)15 (199)
24 (41)4 (2)27 (41)
148 (408)197 (603)43 (264)
208 (291)203 (427)
12 (12)
1,037 (524)
31 (55)
25 (35)
1,000 (508)
35 (74)
433 (129)
384 (247)
1,184 (588) 27 (54)
1 (2)
336 (255)
868 (350)
156 (105)
118 (23)
59 (68)
56 (42)
1 (0)
63 (52)
416 (260)699 (409)
58 (36)
16 (7)
5 (2)
10 (7)
444 (1,153)
73 (147)
18 (37)
443 (1,326)
57 (57)
425 (407)
244 (504)
37 (697)
506 (1,260)
10 (13)
295 (151)
313 (846)
Buchanan Rd.

Loveridge Rd.

Buchanan Rd.

Woodborough Pl.

Buchanan Rd.

Ventura Dr.

Buchanan Rd.

Meadows Ave.

Buchanan Rd.

Somersville Rd.

Project
Site

CALIFORNIA
4 6 7
SUZANNE DR.
843
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 35

5.0 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
This scenario is identical to Cumulative Conditions, with the addition of projected traffic from the proposed development of the project. Trip generation, distribution, and assignment for the proposed project are identical to that assumed under Existing plus Project Conditions. Figure 11 shows projected turning movement volumes at all the study intersections for Cumulative plus Project Conditions.

5.1 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS The intersection LOS analysis results for Cumulative (Year 2035) plus Project Conditions are summarized in Table 11. Detailed calculation sheets for Cumulative plus Project Conditions are contained in Appendix E.

Under this scenario, all the intersections operate within City of Pittsburg standards except for the following intersections.
 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2) operates at LOS F during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
 Somersville Road and Buchanan Road (Intersection 5) operates at LOS E during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 1 (Intersection 6) operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour.
 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 2 (Intersection 7) operates at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour.

Table 11: Intersection Level of Service Analysis - Cumulative plus Project Conditions # Intersection Control Peak
Hour1
Cumulative
Conditions
Cumulative
with Project
Conditions
Change
in
Delay4
Delay (Sec) 2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3
1 Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 34.1 C 34.9 C 0.8 PM 19.6 B 20.4 C 0.8
2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan
Road
Two-Way
Stop
AM 56.8 F 60.7 F 3.9
PM 95.2 F 103.8 F 8.6
3 Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 20.1 C 21.1 C 1.0 PM 37.0 D 39.4 D 2.4
4 Meadows Avenue and Buchanan
Road Signalized AM 12.0 B 12.5 B 0.5
PM 27.1 C 29.0 C 1.9
5 Somersville Road and Buchanan Road Signalized AM 57.9 E 60.2 E 2.3 PM 61.5 E 64.5 E 3.0
6 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway
1 One-Way
Stop
AM N/A N/A 32.5 D …
PM 48.7 E …
7 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway
2 One-Way
Stop
AM N/A N/A 34.0 D …
PM 60.3 F …
Notes:
1 AM – morning peak hour (between 7 and 9 a.m.), PM – evening peak hour (between 4 and 6 p.m.) 2 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections. ³LOS – Level of Service calculations conducted using the Synchro 9.0 level of service analysis software package, which applies the methodology described in the HCM 2010.
844
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 36
4 . Change in delay between Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions.

Bold text indicates intersection operates at a deficient Level of Service.

The peak-hour signal warrant from the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) was evaluated for the unsignalized intersection Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2), which operates at unacceptable LOS under Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions to determine if a traffic signal is warranted. The unsignalized intersection does not meet CA MUTCD peak hour signal warrant in either the a.m. or p.m. peak hour for Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions. MUTCD peak hour signal warrants sheets for Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions are contained in Appendix E.

At this intersection the major street (Buchanan Road) volumes are high on both approaches, so on the minor street (Woodborough Place) there are few gaps. In particular, the left turns experience long wait times at this intersection. Hence, the minor street approaches experience higher delays. Thus, the LOS F operations only apply to the Woodborough Place southbound approach, which have very low volumes in both a.m. and p.m. peak hours.

At the two Project Driveways on Buchanan Road (Intersection 6 & 7), the major street volumes are high on both approaches, so on the minor street (Project Driveway) there are few gaps. Hence, the minor street approaches experience higher delays. Thus, the LOS E/F operations only apply to the southbound approaches on the Project Driveways, which have very low volumes in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.

Somersville Road and Buchanan Road (Intersection # 5) - With the addition of project traffic, the increase in average delay at Somersville Road and Buchanan Road is expected to be 2.3 seconds in the a.m. peak hour and 3.0 seconds in the p.m. peak hour with levels of service of E during the both a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The project is adding 33 trips during a.m. peak hour and 40 trips during p.m. peak hour. Therefore, since the project is adding less than 50 peak hour trips, the impact is considered insignificant.

According to Tuscany Meadows EIR, improvements at Somersville Road and Buchanan Road (Intersection# 5) – consist of constructing an additional eastbound left turn lane to allow for a dual left turn movement onto northbound Somersville Road and an additional northbound lane to allow for a dual left turn movement onto westbound Buchanan Road. The Alternative Mitigation is implementation of PM peak hour metering of southbound Kirker Pass Road at Pheasant Drive. (Ref: Tuscany Meadows Transportation Impact Analysis Report, Page 52)

5.2 PROJECT FAIR SHARE CALCULATION
The fair share is calculated from the Traffic Impact Study guidelines. Based on the projected additional trips from the proposed project, the fair share contribution is approximately 3 percent during the a.m. peak hour and 2.7 percent during the p.m. peak. The Fair Share Analysis results for Cumulative plus Project Conditions are summarized in Table 12. The combined a.m. plus p.m. contribution of the project is 2.83 percent.
845
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 37
Table 12: Fair Share Analysis – Cumulative plus Project Conditions # Intersection Scenario Peak Hour¹
AM PM
5 Somersville Road and Buchanan
Road
Existing Volume (vph) 2068 2552
Project Trips 33 40
Cumulative plus project
Volume (vph) 3144 4058
Fair Share (%)² 3.06 2.65
Notes:
¹AM – morning peak hour (between 7 and 9 a.m.), PM – evening peak hour (between 4 and 6 p.m.) ²Fair Share (%) = Total project trips divided by the increase in the total trips from Existing to Cumulative plus Project Based on Table 12, the fair share contribution is an average of both the peaks which arises to be 2.83 percent.
846
VENTURA DR.

VENTURA DR.

MEADOWS AVE.

GENTRYTOWN DR.

E. LELAND RD.

N. PARK BLVD.

E. LELAND RD.

DELTA FAIR BLVD.

BUCHANAN RD. BUCHANAN RD.

WOODBOROUGH PL.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

SOMERSVILLE RD.

LOVERIDGE RD.

Highlands
Ranch
Park
X
1 2 3 4 5
6 7
Intersection #1
Loveridge Rd./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #2
Woodborough Pl./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #3
Ventura Dr./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #4
Meadows Ave./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #5
Somersville Rd./
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #6
Driveway 1/
Buchanan Rd.

Intersection #7
Driveway 2/
Buchanan Rd.

Cumulative (Year 2035) plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 057-054 - T2 Figure 11

N LEGEND
Study Intersection
AM Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
XX
(XX)
4 (10)5 (28)19 (18)11 (104)17 (202)
28 (45)4 (2)27 (41)
157 (418)197 (603)43 (264)
208 (291)208 (433)
14 (15)
1,053 (543)
33 (57)
25 (35)
1,017 (528)
35 (74)
433 (129)
388 (252)
1,200 (607) 27 (54)
1 (2)
341 (261)
879 (363)
156 (105)
118 (23)
61 (71)
58 (44)
1 (0)
63 (52)
420 (265)699 (409)
58 (36)
16 (7)
5 (2)
10 (7)
460 (1,172)
73 (147)
22 (41)
459 (1,346)
59 (59)
433 (417)
248 (509)
41 (702)
522 (1,279)
10 (13)
295 (151)
324 (859) 8 (10) 9 (10)
14 (16)
1,103 (631)
8 (10)
499 (1,446)
12 (14)13 (16)
9 (10)
1,103 (617)
10 (15)
540 (1,446)
Buchanan Rd.

Loveridge Rd.

Buchanan Rd.

Driveway 1
Buchanan Rd.

Driveway 2
Buchanan Rd.

Woodborough Pl.

Buchanan Rd.

Ventura Dr.

Buchanan Rd.

Meadows Ave.

Buchanan Rd.

Somersville Rd.

Project
Site

CALIFORNIA
4 SUZANNE DR.
847
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 39

6.0 SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE CIRCULATION AND OTHER IMPACTS This section analyzes site access and internal circulation based on the site plan presented in Figure 2.

TJKM reviewed internal and external access for the project site for passenger vehicles, trucks, pedestrians, and bicycles.

6.1 ON-SITE CIRCULATION
TJKM reviewed the proposed project site plan to evaluate on-site access to the project. Figure 2 shows the proposed site plan for the project indicating the location of the project driveways and the internal circulation system. The proposed project’s access will be via two 35 foot wide driveways on Buchanan Road as shown in the project site plan Figure 2. Near the project, Buchannan Road has a two-way left turn lane that will facilitate left turn ingress and egress for both driveway. As noted in Table 9, there is expected to be queuing of one or fewer cars during both peak hours. Left turning vehicles will be able to utilize the center turn lane for safe access. Right turning entering vehicles will be able to utilize the existing bicycle lane for deceleration during time periods where deceleration in the through lanes is inappropriate. Based on a preliminary review of the project conceptual plans (Figure 2), the two project driveways are well spaced and provide adequate distance from public intersections.

The internal circulation for the proposed project was reviewed for issues related to queuing, safety, dead end aisles, and parking spaces that may be difficult to maneuver in and out of project site. All circulation aisles accommodate two-way travel and all of the proposed parking spaces are perpendicular to the drive aisle centerline. Service and emergency vehicles have access to the proposed project via two proposed driveways. Based on this evaluation, the access driveways are expected to be adequate for passenger vehicles and trucks accessing the site. TJKM finds that the proposed configurations would be adequate for the proposed project.

In the site plan provided, a restaurant with a drive through lane is not shown, even though the traffic is included in the intersection analysis. The site plan should be reviewed when the drive through restaurant is added.

6.2 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
Pedestrian access to the project site will be facilitated by existing sidewalks on Buchanan Road, Loveridge Road, Ventura Drive and Meadows Avenue. All the study intersections have crosswalks except the intersection of Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road. All the existing sidewalks are approximately 6 to 10 feet wide varying within the project vicinity. There is adequate street lighting within the vicinity of project site.

A significant impact occurs if the proposed project conflicts with applicable or adopted policies, plans or programs related to pedestrians facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of pedestrian facilities. The proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to existing or planned pedestrian facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project because of the absence of such conflicts. However, the project is expected to generate demand for sidewalks to allow pedestrians to access nearby bus stops, 848
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 40
and adjacent land uses. To accommodate all users of the street system and provide a complete and connected pedestrian facility between the project site and transit service, it is recommended that sidewalks be provided along the project frontage as per the City of Pittsburg standards and the design should meet ADA requirements for a comfortable walking environment.

6.3 BICYCLE ACCESS
In terms of bicycle access to the project site, there are existing Class II bike lanes provided on Buchanan Road, Loveridge Road and on portions of Somersville Road. There are adequate signage/markings for the bicyclists to maneuver without confusion. Overall, existing bicycle facilities provide adequate connectivity between the proposed project site and the adjacent neighborhoods. An impact to bicyclists occurs if the proposed project disrupt existing bicycle facilities; or conflict or create inconsistencies with adopted bicycle system plans, guidelines, and policies. A significant impact occurs if the proposed project conflicts with applicable or adopted policies, plans or programs related to bicycle facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of bicycle facilities. The proposed project does not conflict with existing and planned bicycle facilities, therefore, the impact to bicycle facilities is less-than-significant.

6.4 TRANSIT
The proposed project will generate very few trips via transit services, which can be accommodated by the existing transit capacity and hence the project is anticipated to have a less-than-significant impact on transit facilities.

6.5 SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS
Sight distance is evaluated to determine if a driver will have adequate visibility to enter a roadway safely without resulting in a conflict with traffic already on the roadway. The project access points should be free and clear of any obstructions that would materially and adversely affect sight distance, thereby ensuring that exiting vehicles can see pedestrians on the sidewalk and other vehicles traveling on adjacent roadways. Landscaping and parking should not conflict with a driver’s ability to locate a gap in traffic and see oncoming pedestrians and bicyclists. Adequate corner sight distance (sight distance triangles) should be provided at all site access points in accordance with the City’s standards. Sight distance triangles should be measured approximately 15 feet back from the traveled way. Sight distance requirements vary depending on the roadway speeds. The speed limit on Buchanan Road is 35 mph. According to the Highway Design Manual (HDM), Chapter 200, 2014, the required minimum stopping sight distance for design speed of 35 mph is 250 feet. The line of sight for vehicles exiting the driveways and vehicles travelling eastbound and westbound on Buchanan Road are clear and visible. The project does not substantially increase hazards due to any design features.

6.6 PARKING
Based on the project site plan dated July 15, 2016 (Figure 2), a total of 29 parking spaces are provided for the LMK Petro project, which includes auto parking and ADA parking. As per the site plan, 12 parking spaces would be provided under canopy and one separate space for loading/ unloading. According to the City of Pittsburg Municipal Code, Schedule A (18.78.040) service station requires parking spaces of 4 plus 1 849
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 41
per 500 square feet. Based on the City of Pittsburg Municipal Code the total parking required for the project is 15 parking stalls. Therefore, no parking impacts are projected on City streets. 850
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 42

7.0 CONCLUSION
 The proposed LMK Petro project is expected to generate 1,834 daily vehicular trips in which 84 vehicle trips are generated during the a.m. peak hour and 101 vehicle trips are generated during the p.m. peak hour.
 Under Existing Conditions, all the intersections operate within City of Pittsburg standards during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours except for the intersection of Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road, which operates at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour.  Under Existing plus Project Conditions, Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road continues to operate unacceptable. Based on the peak-hour signal warrant from the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), a traffic signal is not warranted.  Under Cumulative Conditions, all the intersections continue to operate acceptable except: 1.) Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2), which operates at LOS F during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours, and 2.) Somersville Road and Buchanan Road (Intersection 5), which operates at LOS E during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours.  Under Cumulative plus Project Conditions, the same two intersections continue to operate unacceptably. Traffic signals are not warranted at Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road (Intersection 2). At Somersville Road and Buchanan Road (Intersection 5), the increase in average delay under Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions is less than 5 seconds during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. Therefore, the impact is considered insignificant. The Fair Share contribution for the proposed project under Cumulative plus Project Conditions is approximately

2.83 percent.
 The proposed project does not conflict with existing and planned pedestrian or bicycle facilities.

There are two bus stops within 500 feet walking distance of the project site. There is one transit stop located at the east of the intersection of Buchanan Road and Meadows Avenue and other transit stop located at the west of the intersection of Buchanan Road and Ventura Drive. The transit service within the immediate vicinity of the project site operates well below capacity, and additional trips generated by the proposed project could be accommodated by existing bus services. Therefore the impacts to pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities are less-than-significant.

However, to accommodate all users of the street system and provide a complete and connected pedestrian facility between the project site and adjacent neighborhoods sidewalks should be provided on the project frontage.
 The proposed project’s access will be via two full access driveways on Buchanan Road. Based on the evaluation, the proposed on-site vehicle circulation is adequate and should not result in any significant traffic operations issues. The current site plan does not show a drive through restaurant.
 The two project driveways operate at unacceptable conditions due to delays to traffic leaving the site during peak periods. However, the delay only affects a small amount of site traffic and does not result in the satisfaction of traffic signal warrants. Queuing of vehicles entering the site will be minimal. The center two way left turn lane will facilitate left turn movements in and out of the site. 851
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 43
Motorists will be able to utilize the existing bicycle lanes along the site frontage to facilitate right turn movements in and out of the site. Therefore, no changes are recommended. The entrance/exit does not create a significant impact to the operation of Buchannan Road.  TJKM further recommends that all circulation aisles and curb returns be sized so that all vehicles can safely negotiate the site.
 As per the City of Pittsburg requirements, the total parking required by the project is 15 stalls. The project provides a total of 29 parking stalls, plus 12 parking spaces would be provided under canopy and one separate space for loading/ unloading. Therefore, no parking impacts are projected on City streets.
852
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 44
Appendix A –Traffic Counts Sheets

853
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturns Total 7:00 14 0 41 3 58 0 105 37 0 142 0 0 0 0 0 46 40 0 0 86 286 3 7:15 25 0 58 4 87 0 124 38 0 162 0 0 0 0 0 52 72 0 0 124 373 4 7:30 25 0 95 1 121 0 141 51 0 192 0 0 0 0 0 83 93 0 0 176 489 1 7:45 43 0 70 2 115 0 139 57 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 86 109 0 0 195 506 2 Total 107 0 264 10 381 0 509 183 0 692 0 0 0 0 0 267 314 0 0 581 1654 10 8:00 48 0 60 4 112 0 150 41 0 191 0 0 0 0 0 66 93 0 0 159 462 4 8:15 34 0 60 3 97 0 157 45 0 202 0 0 0 0 0 52 104 0 0 156 455 3 8:30 30 0 50 3 83 0 116 61 0 177 0 0 0 0 0 49 103 0 0 152 412 3 8:45 31 0 34 8 73 0 105 54 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 37 62 0 0 99 331 8 Total 143 0 204 18 365 0 528 201 0 729 0 0 0 0 0 204 362 0 0 566 1660 18 16:00 64 0 78 2 144 0 106 47 0 153 0 0 0 0 0 56 176 0 0 232 529 2 16:15 58 0 60 2 120 0 79 56 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 41 188 0 0 229 484 2 16:30 57 0 73 0 130 0 79 57 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 54 180 0 0 234 500 0 16:45 48 0 78 3 129 0 92 45 0 137 0 0 0 0 0 40 198 0 0 238 504 3 Total 227 0 289 7 523 0 356 205 0 561 0 0 0 0 0 191 742 0 0 933 2017 7 17:00 49 0 71 3 123 0 89 39 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 45 210 0 0 255 506 3 17:15 52 0 85 2 139 0 95 56 0 151 0 0 0 0 0 39 196 0 0 235 525 2 17:30 66 0 82 0 148 0 85 44 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 50 181 0 0 231 508 0 17:45 62 0 69 1 132 0 90 44 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 52 186 0 0 238 504 1 Total 229 0 307 6 542 0 359 183 0 542 0 0 0 0 0 186 773 0 0 959 2043 6 Grand Total 706 0 1064 41 1811 0 1752 772 0 2524 0 0 0 0 0 848 2191 0 0 3039 7374 41 Apprch % 39.0% 0.0% 58.8% 2.3% 0.0% 69.4% 30.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 27.9% 72.1% 0.0% 0.0% Total % 9.6% 0.0% 14.4% 0.6% 24.6% 0.0% 23.8% 10.5% 0.0% 34.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.5% 29.7% 0.0% 0.0% 41.2% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 25 0 95 1 121 0 141 51 0 192 0 0 0 0 0 83 93 0 0 176 489 7:45 43 0 70 2 115 0 139 57 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 86 109 0 0 195 506 8:00 48 0 60 4 112 0 150 41 0 191 0 0 0 0 0 66 93 0 0 159 462 8:15 34 0 60 3 97 0 157 45 0 202 0 0 0 0 0 52 104 0 0 156 455 Total Volume 150 0 285 10 445 0 587 194 0 781 0 0 0 0 0 287 399 0 0 686 1912 % App Total 33.7% 0.0% 64.0% 2.2% 0.0% 75.2% 24.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 41.8% 58.2% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .781 .000 .750 .625 .919 .000 .935 .851 .000 .967 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .834 .915 .000 .000 .879 .945 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 49 0 71 3 123 0 89 39 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 45 210 0 0 255 506 17:15 52 0 85 2 139 0 95 56 0 151 0 0 0 0 0 39 196 0 0 235 525 17:30 66 0 82 0 148 0 85 44 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 50 181 0 0 231 508 17:45 62 0 69 1 132 0 90 44 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 52 186 0 0 238 504 Total Volume 229 0 307 6 542 0 359 183 0 542 0 0 0 0 0 186 773 0 0 959 2043 % App Total 42.3% 0.0% 56.6% 1.1% 0.0% 66.2% 33.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.4% 80.6% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .867 .000 .903 .500 .916 .000 .945 .817 .000 .897 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .894 .920 .000 .000 .940 .973 Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Loveridge Rd
Southbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
Loveridge Rd
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
16-7844-001 Loveridge Rd & Buchanan Rd
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles & Uturns
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Loveridge Rd
Northbound
Loveridge Rd
Southbound
11/15/2016
Loveridge Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Loveridge Rd
Northbound
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted
Bikes On Bank 1
(323) 782-0090
[email protected]
854
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 3 0
16:45 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Total 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 4 0
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
Grand Total 2 0 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 12 0 Apprch % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Total % 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 16.7% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250

PM PEAK
HOUR
Loveridge Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Loveridge Rd
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Loveridge Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Loveridge Rd
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Loveridge Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Loveridge Rd
Northbound
Bank 1 Count = Bikes
11/15/2016
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg (323) 782-0090
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7844-001 Loveridge Rd & Buchanan Rd Bikes On Bank 1
855
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4
7:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
7:30 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 17
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 15
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 10
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
17:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4
Grand Total 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 46 Apprch % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

PM PEAK
HOUR
Loveridge Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Loveridge Rd
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Loveridge Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Loveridge Rd
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Loveridge Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Loveridge Rd
Northbound
Bank 2 Count = Peds
11/15/2016
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg (323) 782-0090
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7844-001 Loveridge Rd & Buchanan Rd Bikes On Bank 1
856
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturns Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 152 4 0 0 0 4 0 47 0 0 47 203 0 7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 4 0 167 4 0 2 0 6 0 92 2 0 94 267 0 7:30 1 0 0 0 1 0 207 2 0 209 4 0 1 0 5 0 106 3 1 110 325 1 7:45 2 0 0 0 2 0 207 2 0 209 3 0 1 0 4 0 144 2 0 146 361 0 Total 3 0 0 0 3 0 729 8 0 737 15 0 4 0 19 0 389 7 1 397 1156 1 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 196 4 0 201 3 0 1 0 4 0 128 2 0 130 335 0 8:15 1 0 3 0 4 0 193 3 0 196 3 0 1 0 4 0 133 1 0 134 338 0 8:30 9 0 3 0 12 1 181 1 0 183 1 0 3 0 4 0 122 0 0 122 321 0 8:45 6 1 4 0 11 0 146 5 0 151 2 0 1 0 3 0 90 0 0 90 255 0 Total 16 1 10 0 27 2 716 13 0 731 9 0 6 0 15 0 473 3 0 476 1249 0 16:00 5 0 8 0 13 1 136 1 0 138 2 0 0 0 2 0 242 1 0 243 396 0 16:15 11 0 4 0 15 0 120 1 0 121 2 0 1 0 3 0 238 5 0 243 382 0 16:30 8 0 7 0 15 0 128 0 0 128 3 0 0 0 3 0 237 4 0 241 387 0 16:45 6 0 5 0 11 1 127 1 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 231 5 0 236 376 0 Total 30 0 24 0 54 2 511 3 0 516 7 0 1 0 8 0 948 15 0 963 1541 0 17:00 13 0 4 0 17 1 126 0 0 127 1 0 0 0 1 0 248 3 0 251 396 0 17:15 5 0 1 0 6 1 145 0 0 146 1 0 0 0 1 0 243 0 0 243 396 0 17:30 2 0 3 0 5 0 125 1 0 126 1 0 1 0 2 0 250 3 0 253 386 0 17:45 3 0 0 0 3 0 142 0 0 142 3 0 1 0 4 0 253 5 0 258 407 0 Total 23 0 8 0 31 2 538 1 0 541 6 0 2 0 8 0 994 11 0 1005 1585 0 Grand Total 72 1 42 0 115 6 2494 25 0 2525 37 0 13 0 50 0 2804 36 1 2841 5531 1 Apprch % 62.6% 0.9% 36.5% 0.0% 0.2% 98.8% 1.0% 0.0% 74.0% 0.0% 26.0% 0.0% 0.0% 98.7% 1.3% 0.0% Total % 1.3% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 2.1% 0.1% 45.1% 0.5% 0.0% 45.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 50.7% 0.7% 0.0% 51.4% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 1 0 0 0 1 0 207 2 0 209 4 0 1 0 5 0 106 3 1 110 325 7:45 2 0 0 0 2 0 207 2 0 209 3 0 1 0 4 0 144 2 0 146 361 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 196 4 0 201 3 0 1 0 4 0 128 2 0 130 335 8:15 1 0 3 0 4 0 193 3 0 196 3 0 1 0 4 0 133 1 0 134 338 Total Volume 4 0 3 0 7 1 803 11 0 815 13 0 4 0 17 0 511 8 1 520 1359 % App Total 57.1% 0.0% 42.9% 0.0% 0.1% 98.5% 1.3% 0.0% 76.5% 0.0% 23.5% 0.0% 0.0% 98.3% 1.5% 0.2% PHF .500 .000 .250 .000 .438 .250 .970 .688 .000 .975 .813 .000 1.000 .000 .850 .000 .887 .667 .250 .890 .941 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 13 0 4 0 17 1 126 0 0 127 1 0 0 0 1 0 248 3 0 251 396 17:15 5 0 1 0 6 1 145 0 0 146 1 0 0 0 1 0 243 0 0 243 396 17:30 2 0 3 0 5 0 125 1 0 126 1 0 1 0 2 0 250 3 0 253 386 17:45 3 0 0 0 3 0 142 0 0 142 3 0 1 0 4 0 253 5 0 258 407 Total Volume 23 0 8 0 31 2 538 1 0 541 6 0 2 0 8 0 994 11 0 1005 1585 % App Total 74.2% 0.0% 25.8% 0.0% 0.4% 99.4% 0.2% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 98.9% 1.1% 0.0% PHF .442 .000 .500 .000 .456 .500 .928 .250 .000 .926 .500 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .982 .550 .000 .974 .974 Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Woodborough Pl
Southbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
Woodborough Pl
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
16-7844-002 Woodborough Pl & Buchanan Rd
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles & Uturns
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Woodborough Pl
Northbound
Woodborough Pl
Southbound
11/15/2016
Woodborough Pl
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Woodborough Pl
Northbound
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted
Bikes On Bank 1
(323) 782-0090
[email protected]
857
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 4 0
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 5 0
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 0
Grand Total 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 15 0 Apprch % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Total % 13.3% 0.0% 0.0% 13.3% 0.0% 26.7% 26.7% 53.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .375 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .333

PM PEAK
HOUR
Woodborough Pl
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Woodborough Pl
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Woodborough Pl
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Woodborough Pl
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Woodborough Pl
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Woodborough Pl
Northbound
Bank 1 Count = Bikes
11/15/2016
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg (323) 782-0090
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7844-002 Woodborough Pl & Buchanan Rd Bikes On Bank 1
858
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
16:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
17:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Grand Total 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 15 Apprch % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

PM PEAK
HOUR
Woodborough Pl
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Woodborough Pl
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Woodborough Pl
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Woodborough Pl
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Woodborough Pl
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Woodborough Pl
Northbound
Bank 2 Count = Peds
11/15/2016
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg (323) 782-0090
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7844-002 Woodborough Pl & Buchanan Rd Bikes On Bank 1
859
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturns Total 7:00 3 1 3 0 7 1 112 2 0 115 31 12 7 0 50 0 41 7 0 48 220 0 7:15 1 3 1 0 5 3 142 5 0 150 25 16 4 0 45 0 85 8 0 93 293 0 7:30 2 1 3 0 6 5 167 1 0 173 34 20 11 0 65 2 94 15 0 111 355 0 7:45 3 1 2 0 6 1 184 1 0 186 25 12 12 0 49 0 117 25 0 142 383 0 Total 9 6 9 0 24 10 605 9 0 624 115 60 34 0 209 2 337 55 0 394 1251 0 8:00 4 0 1 0 5 6 187 3 0 196 28 8 9 0 45 0 104 24 0 128 374 0 8:15 3 2 3 0 8 10 159 2 0 171 16 7 6 0 29 6 121 18 0 145 353 0 8:30 2 0 4 0 6 5 154 3 0 162 27 1 6 0 34 2 116 17 0 135 337 0 8:45 5 0 3 0 8 5 128 1 0 134 18 3 10 0 31 3 79 17 0 99 272 0 Total 14 2 11 0 27 26 628 9 0 663 89 19 31 0 139 11 420 76 0 507 1336 0 16:00 13 11 5 0 29 11 117 3 0 131 14 4 11 0 29 4 201 24 0 229 418 0 16:15 6 5 4 0 15 4 109 8 0 121 13 2 6 1 22 6 228 28 0 262 420 1 16:30 11 6 2 0 19 6 107 6 0 119 19 1 8 0 28 6 202 28 0 236 402 0 16:45 5 6 4 0 15 9 102 0 0 111 23 2 9 0 34 6 214 29 0 249 409 0 Total 35 28 15 0 78 30 435 17 0 482 69 9 34 1 113 22 845 109 0 976 1649 1 17:00 11 12 9 0 32 5 104 4 0 113 18 3 9 0 30 4 231 26 0 261 436 0 17:15 9 10 4 0 23 11 124 1 0 136 21 1 8 0 30 3 220 28 0 251 440 0 17:30 12 5 4 1 22 8 100 9 0 117 24 4 13 0 41 3 220 38 0 261 441 1 17:45 10 10 7 0 27 3 113 5 0 121 21 5 10 0 36 2 219 42 0 263 447 0 Total 42 37 24 1 104 27 441 19 0 487 84 13 40 0 137 12 890 134 0 1036 1764 1 Grand Total 100 73 59 1 233 93 2109 54 0 2256 357 101 139 1 598 47 2492 374 0 2913 6000 2 Apprch % 42.9% 31.3% 25.3% 0.4% 4.1% 93.5% 2.4% 0.0% 59.7% 16.9% 23.2% 0.2% 1.6% 85.5% 12.8% 0.0% Total % 1.7% 1.2% 1.0% 0.0% 3.9% 1.6% 35.2% 0.9% 0.0% 37.6% 6.0% 1.7% 2.3% 0.0% 10.0% 0.8% 41.5% 6.2% 0.0% 48.6% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 2 1 3 0 6 5 167 1 0 173 34 20 11 0 65 2 94 15 0 111 355 7:45 3 1 2 0 6 1 184 1 0 186 25 12 12 0 49 0 117 25 0 142 383 8:00 4 0 1 0 5 6 187 3 0 196 28 8 9 0 45 0 104 24 0 128 374 8:15 3 2 3 0 8 10 159 2 0 171 16 7 6 0 29 6 121 18 0 145 353 Total Volume 12 4 9 0 25 22 697 7 0 726 103 47 38 0 188 8 436 82 0 526 1465 % App Total 48.0% 16.0% 36.0% 0.0% 3.0% 96.0% 1.0% 0.0% 54.8% 25.0% 20.2% 0.0% 1.5% 82.9% 15.6% 0.0% PHF .750 .500 .750 .000 .781 .550 .932 .583 .000 .926 .757 .588 .792 .000 .723 .333 .901 .820 .000 .907 .956 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 11 12 9 0 32 5 104 4 0 113 18 3 9 0 30 4 231 26 0 261 436 17:15 9 10 4 0 23 11 124 1 0 136 21 1 8 0 30 3 220 28 0 251 440 17:30 12 5 4 1 22 8 100 9 0 117 24 4 13 0 41 3 220 38 0 261 441 17:45 10 10 7 0 27 3 113 5 0 121 21 5 10 0 36 2 219 42 0 263 447 Total Volume 42 37 24 1 104 27 441 19 0 487 84 13 40 0 137 12 890 134 0 1036 1764 % App Total 40.4% 35.6% 23.1% 1.0% 5.5% 90.6% 3.9% 0.0% 61.3% 9.5% 29.2% 0.0% 1.2% 85.9% 12.9% 0.0% PHF .875 .771 .667 .250 .813 .614 .889 .528 .000 .895 .875 .650 .769 .000 .835 .750 .963 .798 .000 .985 .987 Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Ventura Dr
Southbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
Ventura Dr
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
16-7844-003 Ventura Dr & Buchanan Rd
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles & Uturns
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Ventura Dr
Northbound
Ventura Dr
Southbound
11/15/2016
Ventura Dr
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Ventura Dr
Northbound
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted
Bikes On Bank 1
(323) 782-0090
[email protected]
860
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 4 0
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 3 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 5 0
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:15 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0
Grand Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 4 3 0 0 7 0 6 1 0 7 18 0 Apprch % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 57.1% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3% Total % 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 16.7% 22.2% 16.7% 0.0% 38.9% 0.0% 33.3% 5.6% 38.9% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .333 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:15 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Total Volume 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
% App Total 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% PHF .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .500

PM PEAK
HOUR
Ventura Dr
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Ventura Dr
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Ventura Dr
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Ventura Dr
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Ventura Dr
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Ventura Dr
Northbound
Bank 1 Count = Bikes
11/15/2016
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg (323) 782-0090
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7844-003 Ventura Dr & Buchanan Rd Bikes On Bank 1
861
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 6
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 14
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 11
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 6
Grand Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 36 Apprch % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

PM PEAK
HOUR
Ventura Dr
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Ventura Dr
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Ventura Dr
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Ventura Dr
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Ventura Dr
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Ventura Dr
Northbound
Bank 2 Count = Peds
11/15/2016
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg (323) 782-0090
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7844-003 Ventura Dr & Buchanan Rd Bikes On Bank 1
862
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturns Total 7:00 4 1 4 0 9 5 105 4 0 114 10 0 6 0 16 1 43 4 0 48 187 0 7:15 10 0 2 0 12 7 135 1 0 143 9 1 14 0 24 3 74 4 0 81 260 0 7:30 10 1 5 0 16 13 154 1 0 168 14 0 13 0 27 2 102 8 0 112 323 0 7:45 5 2 4 0 11 6 161 2 0 169 22 0 14 0 36 2 120 7 0 129 345 0 Total 29 4 15 0 48 31 555 8 0 594 55 1 47 0 103 8 339 23 0 370 1115 0 8:00 2 0 7 0 9 6 190 6 0 202 9 0 14 0 23 6 104 18 0 128 362 0 8:15 5 0 3 0 8 6 149 6 0 161 7 0 10 0 17 4 108 13 0 125 311 0 8:30 10 1 6 0 17 11 150 7 0 168 8 1 14 0 23 3 109 9 0 121 329 0 8:45 4 0 7 0 11 5 128 3 0 136 4 0 6 0 10 3 91 6 0 100 257 0 Total 21 1 23 0 45 28 617 22 0 667 28 1 44 0 73 16 412 46 0 474 1259 0 16:00 9 0 8 0 17 15 110 9 0 134 10 0 15 0 25 5 196 24 0 225 401 0 16:15 7 0 2 0 9 15 122 9 0 146 5 0 8 0 13 7 225 14 0 246 414 0 16:30 8 0 7 0 15 14 90 6 0 110 16 0 14 0 30 8 201 7 0 216 371 0 16:45 6 0 9 0 15 14 101 6 0 121 5 1 14 0 20 6 208 9 0 223 379 0 Total 30 0 26 0 56 58 423 30 0 511 36 1 51 0 88 26 830 54 0 910 1565 0 17:00 5 0 4 0 9 11 94 9 0 114 8 0 15 0 23 7 230 17 0 254 400 0 17:15 14 0 12 0 26 17 108 8 0 133 9 0 8 0 17 7 222 9 0 238 414 0 17:30 8 1 10 0 19 14 100 4 0 118 6 0 10 0 16 11 221 11 0 243 396 0 17:45 7 1 8 0 16 19 102 8 0 129 12 0 10 0 22 6 228 10 0 244 411 0 Total 34 2 34 0 70 61 404 29 0 494 35 0 43 0 78 31 901 47 0 979 1621 0 Grand Total 114 7 98 0 219 178 1999 89 0 2266 154 3 185 0 342 81 2482 170 0 2733 5560 0 Apprch % 52.1% 3.2% 44.7% 0.0% 7.9% 88.2% 3.9% 0.0% 45.0% 0.9% 54.1% 0.0% 3.0% 90.8% 6.2% 0.0% Total % 2.1% 0.1% 1.8% 0.0% 3.9% 3.2% 36.0% 1.6% 0.0% 40.8% 2.8% 0.1% 3.3% 0.0% 6.2% 1.5% 44.6% 3.1% 0.0% 49.2% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 to 08:45
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
7:45 5 2 4 0 11 6 161 2 0 169 22 0 14 0 36 2 120 7 0 129 345 8:00 2 0 7 0 9 6 190 6 0 202 9 0 14 0 23 6 104 18 0 128 362 8:15 5 0 3 0 8 6 149 6 0 161 7 0 10 0 17 4 108 13 0 125 311 8:30 10 1 6 0 17 11 150 7 0 168 8 1 14 0 23 3 109 9 0 121 329 Total Volume 22 3 20 0 45 29 650 21 0 700 46 1 52 0 99 15 441 47 0 503 1347 % App Total 48.9% 6.7% 44.4% 0.0% 4.1% 92.9% 3.0% 0.0% 46.5% 1.0% 52.5% 0.0% 3.0% 87.7% 9.3% 0.0% PHF .550 .375 .714 .000 .662 .659 .855 .750 .000 .866 .523 .250 .929 .000 .688 .625 .919 .653 .000 .975 .930 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 5 0 4 0 9 11 94 9 0 114 8 0 15 0 23 7 230 17 0 254 400 17:15 14 0 12 0 26 17 108 8 0 133 9 0 8 0 17 7 222 9 0 238 414 17:30 8 1 10 0 19 14 100 4 0 118 6 0 10 0 16 11 221 11 0 243 396 17:45 7 1 8 0 16 19 102 8 0 129 12 0 10 0 22 6 228 10 0 244 411 Total Volume 34 2 34 0 70 61 404 29 0 494 35 0 43 0 78 31 901 47 0 979 1621 % App Total 48.6% 2.9% 48.6% 0.0% 12.3% 81.8% 5.9% 0.0% 44.9% 0.0% 55.1% 0.0% 3.2% 92.0% 4.8% 0.0% PHF .607 .500 .708 .000 .673 .803 .935 .806 .000 .929 .729 .000 .717 .000 .848 .705 .979 .691 .000 .964 .979 Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Meadows Ave
Southbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
Meadows Ave
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
16-7844-004 Meadows Ave & Buchanan Rd
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles & Uturns
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Meadows Ave
Northbound
Meadows Ave
Southbound
11/15/2016
Meadows Ave
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Meadows Ave
Northbound
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted
Bikes On Bank 1
(323) 782-0090
[email protected]
863
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
8:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 0
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 3 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 5 5 0
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Grand Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 6 10 0 Apprch % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 50.0% 33.3% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 30.0% 0.0% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 30.0% 20.0% 60.0% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 to 08:45
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Total Volume 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .500 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250

PM PEAK
HOUR
Meadows Ave
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Meadows Ave
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Meadows Ave
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Meadows Ave
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Meadows Ave
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Meadows Ave
Northbound
Bank 1 Count = Bikes
11/15/2016
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg (323) 782-0090
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7844-004 Meadows Ave & Buchanan Rd Bikes On Bank 1
864
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 Apprch % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 to 08:45
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

PM PEAK
HOUR
Meadows Ave
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Meadows Ave
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Meadows Ave
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Meadows Ave
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Meadows Ave
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Meadows Ave
Northbound
Bank 2 Count = Peds
11/15/2016
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg (323) 782-0090
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7844-004 Meadows Ave & Buchanan Rd Bikes On Bank 1
865
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturns Total 7:00 8 23 21 0 52 0 48 13 0 61 61 106 0 0 167 30 13 18 1 62 342 1 7:15 9 23 16 0 48 3 45 16 1 65 81 110 8 0 199 41 19 36 0 96 408 1 7:30 12 25 30 0 67 2 67 33 1 103 79 112 4 0 195 58 40 50 3 151 516 4 7:45 10 45 43 0 98 2 57 32 3 94 97 130 2 0 229 70 34 37 1 142 563 4 Total 39 116 110 0 265 7 217 94 5 323 318 458 14 0 790 199 106 141 5 451 1829 10 8:00 13 45 50 0 108 4 76 34 5 119 77 79 1 0 157 55 41 53 1 150 534 6 8:15 14 40 41 0 95 7 57 19 4 87 68 77 4 0 149 52 33 38 1 124 455 5 8:30 12 43 37 0 92 6 43 15 2 66 75 57 6 0 138 51 39 43 3 136 432 5 8:45 22 36 36 0 94 3 33 20 0 56 66 98 5 0 169 52 42 27 2 123 442 2 Total 61 164 164 0 389 20 209 88 11 328 286 311 16 0 613 210 155 161 7 533 1863 18 16:00 36 114 65 1 216 8 40 20 0 68 46 73 7 0 126 76 83 91 3 253 663 4 16:15 34 90 58 0 182 5 46 15 3 69 43 64 3 0 110 64 75 84 1 224 585 4 16:30 29 98 51 0 178 8 33 19 0 60 42 74 7 0 123 71 98 82 6 257 618 6 16:45 27 108 59 0 194 4 25 21 0 50 43 69 1 0 113 68 82 94 4 248 605 4 Total 126 410 233 1 770 25 144 75 3 247 174 280 18 0 472 279 338 351 14 982 2471 18 17:00 49 115 63 1 228 4 30 20 1 55 43 55 5 0 103 67 86 105 3 261 647 5 17:15 38 109 80 0 227 10 40 19 2 71 43 48 1 0 92 75 89 109 1 274 664 3 17:30 26 112 55 0 193 5 32 24 0 61 40 65 4 0 109 80 72 100 0 252 615 0 17:45 31 100 65 0 196 7 42 23 1 73 42 47 2 0 91 82 71 110 3 266 626 4 Total 144 436 263 1 844 26 144 86 4 260 168 215 12 0 395 304 318 424 7 1053 2552 12 Grand Total 370 1126 770 2 2268 78 714 343 23 1158 946 1264 60 0 2270 992 917 1077 33 3019 8715 58 Apprch % 16.3% 49.6% 34.0% 0.1% 6.7% 61.7% 29.6% 2.0% 41.7% 55.7% 2.6% 0.0% 32.9% 30.4% 35.7% 1.1% Total % 4.2% 12.9% 8.8% 0.0% 26.0% 0.9% 8.2% 3.9% 0.3% 13.3% 10.9% 14.5% 0.7% 0.0% 26.0% 11.4% 10.5% 12.4% 0.4% 34.6% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 12 25 30 0 67 2 67 33 1 103 79 112 4 0 195 58 40 50 3 151 516 7:45 10 45 43 0 98 2 57 32 3 94 97 130 2 0 229 70 34 37 1 142 563 8:00 13 45 50 0 108 4 76 34 5 119 77 79 1 0 157 55 41 53 1 150 534 8:15 14 40 41 0 95 7 57 19 4 87 68 77 4 0 149 52 33 38 1 124 455 Total Volume 49 155 164 0 368 15 257 118 13 403 321 398 11 0 730 235 148 178 6 567 2068 % App Total 13.3% 42.1% 44.6% 0.0% 3.7% 63.8% 29.3% 3.2% 44.0% 54.5% 1.5% 0.0% 41.4% 26.1% 31.4% 1.1% PHF .875 .861 .820 .000 .852 .536 .845 .868 .650 .847 .827 .765 .688 .000 .797 .839 .902 .840 .500 .939 .918 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 49 115 63 1 228 4 30 20 1 55 43 55 5 0 103 67 86 105 3 261 647 17:15 38 109 80 0 227 10 40 19 2 71 43 48 1 0 92 75 89 109 1 274 664 17:30 26 112 55 0 193 5 32 24 0 61 40 65 4 0 109 80 72 100 0 252 615 17:45 31 100 65 0 196 7 42 23 1 73 42 47 2 0 91 82 71 110 3 266 626 Total Volume 144 436 263 1 844 26 144 86 4 260 168 215 12 0 395 304 318 424 7 1053 2552 % App Total 17.1% 51.7% 31.2% 0.1% 10.0% 55.4% 33.1% 1.5% 42.5% 54.4% 3.0% 0.0% 28.9% 30.2% 40.3% 0.7% PHF .735 .948 .822 .250 .925 .650 .857 .896 .500 .890 .977 .827 .600 .000 .906 .927 .893 .964 .583 .961 .961 Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Somersville Rd
Southbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
Somersville Rd
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
16-7844-005 Somersville Rd & Buchanan Rd
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles & Uturns
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Somersville Rd
Northbound
Somersville Rd
Southbound
11/15/2016
Somersville Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Somersville Rd
Northbound
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted
Bikes On Bank 1
(323) 782-0090
[email protected]
866
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
17:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 4 0
Grand Total 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 4 1 1 1 0 3 1 2 0 0 3 12 0 Apprch % 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0% Total % 8.3% 8.3% 0.0% 16.7% 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 33.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 25.0% 8.3% 16.7% 0.0% 25.0% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
% App Total 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .375 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
17:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Total Volume 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 4
% App Total 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .250 .000 .500 1.000

PM PEAK
HOUR
Somersville Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Somersville Rd
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Somersville Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Somersville Rd
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Somersville Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Somersville Rd
Northbound
Bank 1 Count = Bikes
11/15/2016
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg (323) 782-0090
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7844-005 Somersville Rd & Buchanan Rd Bikes On Bank 1
867
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4
7:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 9
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3
16:45 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6
Total 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 14
17:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
17:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7
Grand Total 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 34 Apprch % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 to 08:30
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
17:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

PM PEAK
HOUR
Somersville Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Somersville Rd
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Somersville Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Somersville Rd
Northbound
Buchanan Rd
Eastbound
Peds On Bank 2
Somersville Rd
Southbound
Buchanan Rd
Westbound
Somersville Rd
Northbound
Bank 2 Count = Peds
11/15/2016
National Data and Surveying Services
City of Pittsburg (323) 782-0090
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7844-005 Somersville Rd & Buchanan Rd Bikes On Bank 1
868
869
870
871
872
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 45
Appendix B – Existing Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
873
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 287 399 587 194 160 285
Future Volume (veh/h) 287 399 587 194 160 285
Number 5 2 6 16 7 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 326 453 605 200 174 310
Adj No. of Lanes 111111
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 364 1223 729 603 386 345
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.66 0.39 0.39 0.22 0.22
Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1863 1541 1774 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 326 453 605 200 174 310
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1863 1541 1774 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 14.9 9.2 24.4 7.6 7.1 15.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.9 9.2 24.4 7.6 7.1 15.9
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 364 1223 729 603 386 345
V/C Ratio(X) 0.90 0.37 0.83 0.33 0.45 0.90
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 425 1450 893 738 425 379
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.3 6.5 22.9 17.8 28.3 31.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.0 0.2 5.5 0.3 0.4 21.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.2 4.7 13.6 3.3 3.5 14.8
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.3 6.7 28.4 18.1 28.8 53.2
LnGrp LOS D A C B C D
Approach Vol, veh/h 779 805 484
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.0 25.9 44.4
Approach LOS C C D
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 59.8 23.7 22.1 37.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 20.0 20.0 40.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.2 17.9 16.9 26.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 9.7 0.3 0.2 6.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 29.9
HCM 2010 LOS C
Notes
874
HCM 2010 TWSC
2: Woodborough Place/Driveway & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 511 8 1 803 0 13 0 4 4 0 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 511 8 1 803 0 13 0 4 4 0 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 98 98 98 85 85 85 44 44 44
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 574 9 1 819 0 15 0 5 9 0 7
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 819 0 0 583 0 0 1400 1400 579 1402 1404 821 Stage 1 - - - - - - 579 579 - 821 821 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 821 821 - 581 583 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 810 - - 991 - - 118 140 515 117 140 374 Stage 1 - - - - - - 501 501 - 369 389 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 369 389 - 499 499 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 808 - - 991 - - 115 140 515 116 140 373 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 115 140 - 116 140 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 501 501 - 369 388 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 361 388 - 494 499 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 34.7 28.5

HCM LOS D D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 141 808 - - 991 - - 116 373
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.142 - - - 0.001 - - 0.078 0.018
HCM Control Delay (s) 34.7 0 - - 8.6 0 - 38.7 14.8
HCM Lane LOS D A - - A A - E B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 0.1
875
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 436 82 22 697 7 103 47 38 12 4 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 436 82 22 697 7 103 47 38 12 4 9 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 479 90 24 749 8 143 65 53 15 5 12 Adj No. of Lanes 111110110110
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.78 0.78 0.78 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 29 904 768 71 936 10 354 152 124 270 78 186
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.51 0.51 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1582 1774 1839 20 1370 943 769 1255 482 1156 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 479 90 24 0 757 143 0 118 15 0 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1582 1774 0 1859 1370 0 1713 1255 0 1637 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 8.8 1.5 0.7 0.0 16.7 4.9 0.0 3.1 0.5 0.0 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 8.8 1.5 0.7 0.0 16.7 5.3 0.0 3.1 3.6 0.0 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.71
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 29 904 768 71 0 946 354 0 276 270 0 264 V/C Ratio(X) 0.31 0.53 0.12 0.34 0.00 0.80 0.40 0.00 0.43 0.06 0.00 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 538 2978 2529 538 0 2972 771 0 797 652 0 762 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.0 8.8 6.9 23.1 0.0 10.1 19.8 0.0 18.7 20.3 0.0 17.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 4.4 0.7 0.3 0.0 8.6 1.9 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.2 9.0 7.0 24.1 0.0 10.7 20.1 0.0 19.1 20.3 0.0 17.6 LnGrp LOS C A A C B C B C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 578 781 261 32
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.9 11.1 19.6 18.9
Approach LOS ABBB
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.0 29.5 13.0 5.8 30.6 13.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 79.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 10.8 5.6 2.2 18.7 7.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.5 0.6 0.0 6.5 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.8
HCM 2010 LOS B
876
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 441 47 29 650 21 46 1 52 22 3 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 441 47 29 650 21 46 1 52 22 3 20 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 450 48 33 747 24 67 1 75 33 5 30 Adj No. of Lanes 1 11110110110
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.66 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 40 905 753 79 911 29 295 3 191 257 28 170
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.51 0.51 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1550 1774 1795 58 1363 21 1560 1314 230 1382 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 15 450 48 33 0 771 67 0 76 33 0 35 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1863 1550 1774 0 1853 1363 0 1580 1314 0 1612 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 7.7 0.8 0.8 0.0 16.4 2.2 0.0 2.1 1.1 0.0 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 7.7 0.8 0.8 0.0 16.4 3.1 0.0 2.1 3.2 0.0 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.86
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 40 905 753 79 0 940 295 0 194 257 0 198 V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.50 0.06 0.42 0.00 0.82 0.23 0.00 0.39 0.13 0.00 0.18 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 570 1675 1394 570 0 1666 565 0 508 518 0 518 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.5 8.1 6.4 21.7 0.0 9.7 19.7 0.0 18.9 20.3 0.0 18.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 0.2 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.2 3.9 0.3 0.4 0.0 8.3 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.6 8.3 6.4 23.0 0.0 10.4 19.9 0.0 19.4 20.4 0.0 18.5 LnGrp LOS C A A C B B B C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 513 804 143 68
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.6 10.9 19.6 19.4
Approach LOS ABBB
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.2 28.7 10.8 6.2 29.7 10.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.1 6.0 5.1 5.1 6.0 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s15.0 42.0 15.0 15.0 42.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.8 9.7 5.2 2.4 18.4 5.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.6 0.3 0.0 5.3 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.3
HCM 2010 LOS B
Notes
877
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 241 148 178 28 257 118 321 398 11 49 155 164 Future Volume (veh/h) 241 148 178 28 257 118 321 398 11 49 155 164 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 256 157 0 33 302 0 401 498 14 58 182 193 Adj No. of Lanes 1 21111120121
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 291 1302 582 52 434 369 447 1335 37 76 604 270 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.37 0.00 0.03 0.23 0.00 0.25 0.38 0.38 0.04 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3515 99 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 256 157 0 33 302 0 401 250 262 58 182 193 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1844 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.9 3.1 0.0 1.9 15.6 0.0 23.0 10.8 10.8 3.4 4.7 12.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.9 3.1 0.0 1.9 15.6 0.0 23.0 10.8 10.8 3.4 4.7 12.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 291 1302 582 52 434 369 447 672 701 76 604 270 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.12 0.00 0.63 0.70 0.00 0.90 0.37 0.37 0.77 0.30 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 589 1847 826 337 707 601 757 923 962 505 1343 601 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.0 22.0 0.0 50.6 37.0 0.0 38.1 23.6 23.6 49.9 38.2 41.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.4 0.2 0.0 9.0 8.9 0.0 9.0 0.3 0.2 11.4 0.2 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln7.8 1.5 0.0 1.1 9.1 0.0 12.4 5.3 5.6 1.9 2.3 5.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.4 22.2 0.0 59.6 45.9 0.0 47.1 23.9 23.9 61.3 38.4 43.9 LnGrp LOS D C E D D C C E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 413 335 913 433
Approach Delay, s/veh 39.1 47.3 34.1 43.9
Approach LOS DDCD
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.0 45.0 7.6 43.8 31.0 23.0 21.8 29.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s30.0 55.0 20.0 55.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.4 12.8 3.9 5.1 25.0 14.1 16.9 17.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.9 0.0 9.2 1.5 3.7 0.5 6.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 39.2
HCM 2010 LOS D
878
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 186 773 359 183 235 307
Future Volume (veh/h) 186 773 359 183 235 307
Number 5 2 6 16 7 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 198 822 399 203 255 334
Adj No. of Lanes 111111
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 247 1099 693 575 433 387
Arrive On Green 0.14 0.59 0.37 0.37 0.24 0.24
Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1863 1545 1774 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 198 822 399 203 255 334
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1863 1545 1774 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.8 20.5 10.8 6.0 8.0 12.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.8 20.5 10.8 6.0 8.0 12.8
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 247 1099 693 575 433 387
V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.75 0.58 0.35 0.59 0.86
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 560 1912 1177 976 560 500
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.4 9.5 15.9 14.4 21.1 22.9
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.3 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.7 10.4
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.6 10.6 5.7 2.6 4.0 11.4
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.7 10.6 16.6 14.7 21.8 33.3
LnGrp LOS C B B B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1020 602 589
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.3 16.0 28.4
Approach LOS B B C
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 42.4 21.0 13.8 28.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 20.0 20.0 40.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.5 14.8 8.8 12.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 12.3 0.7 0.2 10.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.5
HCM 2010 LOS B
Notes
879
HCM 2010 TWSC
2: Woodborough Place/Driveway & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 994 11 2 538 0 6 0 2 23 0 8
Future Vol, veh/h 0 994 11 2 538 0 6 0 2 23 0 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 93 93 93 50 50 50 46 46 46
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 1025 11 2 578 0 12 0 4 50 0 17
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 578 0 0 1036 0 0 1613 1613 1031 1615 1619 580 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1030 1030 - 583 583 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 583 583 - 1032 1036 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 996 - - 671 - - 84 104 283 83 103 514 Stage 1 - - - - - - 282 311 - 498 499 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 498 499 - 281 309 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 994 - - 670 - - 81 104 283 81 103 513 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 81 104 - 81 103 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 282 311 - 498 497 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 478 497 - 277 309 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 48.2 80.3

HCM LOS E F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 99 994 - - 670 - - 81 513
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.162 - - - 0.003 - - 0.617 0.034
HCM Control Delay (s) 48.2 0 - - 10.4 0 - 103.9 12.3
HCM Lane LOS E A - - B A - F B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 - - 2.8 0.1
880
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 12 890 134 27 441 19 84 13 40 43 37 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 12 890 134 27 441 19 84 13 40 43 37 24 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 899 135 30 490 21 100 15 48 53 46 30 Adj No. of Lanes 111110110110
Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.81 0.81 0.81 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 37 1053 893 80 1045 45 258 59 187 266 159 103 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.57 0.57 0.05 0.59 0.59 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1579 1774 1773 76 1308 388 1241 1323 1049 684 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 899 135 30 0 511 100 0 63 53 0 76 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1579 1774 0 1849 1308 0 1629 1323 0 1734 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 26.3 2.6 1.1 0.0 10.2 4.8 0.0 2.2 2.4 0.0 2.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 26.3 2.6 1.1 0.0 10.2 7.3 0.0 2.2 4.6 0.0 2.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.39
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 37 1053 893 80 0 1090 258 0 246 266 0 262 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.85 0.15 0.38 0.00 0.47 0.39 0.00 0.26 0.20 0.00 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 410 2266 1921 410 0 2250 523 0 577 534 0 614 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.3 11.9 6.7 30.1 0.0 7.6 27.7 0.0 24.3 26.4 0.0 24.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.8 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 13.5 1.1 0.5 0.0 5.1 1.7 0.0 1.0 0.9 0.0 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.2 12.7 6.7 31.2 0.0 7.7 28.1 0.0 24.5 26.5 0.0 24.7 LnGrp LOS C B A C A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1046 541 163 129
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.1 9.0 26.7 25.4
Approach LOS B A C C
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.9 42.2 14.8 6.4 43.8 14.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 79.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 28.3 6.6 2.4 12.2 9.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.4 0.6 0.0 8.4 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 13.4
HCM 2010 LOS B
881
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 31 901 47 61 404 29 35 0 43 34 2 34 Future Volume (veh/h) 31 901 47 61 404 29 35 0 43 34 2 34 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 32 939 49 66 434 31 41 0 51 51 3 51 Adj No. of Lanes 1 11110110110
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.67 0.67 0.67 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 73 1054 895 118 1014 72 212 0 159 214 9 152
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.57 0.57 0.07 0.59 0.59 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1582 1774 1716 123 1345 0 1583 1348 89 1508 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 32 939 49 66 0 465 41 0 51 51 0 54 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1863 1582 1774 0 1838 1345 0 1583 1348 0 1597 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 26.8 0.8 2.2 0.0 8.4 1.8 0.0 1.8 2.2 0.0 1.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 26.8 0.8 2.2 0.0 8.4 3.7 0.0 1.8 4.0 0.0 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 73 1054 895 118 0 1086 212 0 159 214 0 161 V/C Ratio(X) 0.44 0.89 0.05 0.56 0.00 0.43 0.19 0.00 0.32 0.24 0.00 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 439 1290 1096 439 0 1273 409 0 392 412 0 395 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.4 11.5 5.9 27.5 0.0 6.8 27.1 0.0 25.3 27.2 0.0 25.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 6.2 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 15.4 0.4 1.1 0.0 4.2 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.9 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.9 17.7 5.9 29.0 0.0 6.9 27.3 0.0 25.8 27.4 0.0 25.8 LnGrp LOS C B A C A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1020 531 92 105
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.5 9.6 26.4 26.6
Approach LOS B A C C
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.1 40.3 11.2 7.6 41.8 11.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.1 6.0 5.1 5.1 6.0 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s15.0 42.0 15.0 15.0 42.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.2 28.8 6.0 3.1 10.4 5.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.6 0.3 0.0 7.5 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 16.1
HCM 2010 LOS B
Notes
882
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 311 318 424 30 144 86 168 215 12 145 436 263 Future Volume (veh/h) 311 318 424 30 144 86 168 215 12 145 436 263 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 324 331 0 34 162 0 185 236 13 156 469 283 Adj No. of Lanes 1 21111120121
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 367 1328 594 57 373 317 231 905 50 194 865 381 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.38 0.00 0.03 0.20 0.00 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3412 187 1774 3539 1557 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 324 331 0 34 162 0 185 122 127 156 469 283 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1829 1774 1770 1557 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.5 5.6 0.0 1.6 6.6 0.0 8.8 4.7 4.8 7.5 10.1 14.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.5 5.6 0.0 1.6 6.6 0.0 8.8 4.7 4.8 7.5 10.1 14.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 367 1328 594 57 373 317 231 470 485 194 865 381 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.25 0.00 0.60 0.43 0.00 0.80 0.26 0.26 0.80 0.54 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 712 2232 998 407 854 726 915 1116 1154 610 1623 714 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.6 18.8 0.0 41.6 30.5 0.0 36.8 25.3 25.3 37.9 28.7 30.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.4 0.4 0.0 7.2 3.6 0.0 7.5 0.2 0.2 5.7 0.4 2.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln8.1 2.8 0.0 0.9 3.8 0.0 4.8 2.3 2.4 4.0 4.9 6.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.9 19.2 0.0 48.8 34.2 0.0 44.3 25.5 25.5 43.6 29.1 32.6 LnGrp LOS D B D C DCCDCC
Approach Vol, veh/h 655 196 434 908
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.0 36.7 33.5 32.7
Approach LOS CDCC
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s14.0 28.1 7.3 37.7 15.9 26.3 22.6 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s30.0 55.0 20.0 55.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s9.5 6.8 3.6 7.6 10.8 16.6 17.5 8.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.8 0.0 9.7 0.7 4.4 0.6 8.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 32.1
HCM 2010 LOS C
883
Queues
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 326 453 605 200 174 310
v/c Ratio 0.79 0.35 0.83 0.30 0.59 0.60
Control Delay 46.9 6.1 33.1 11.6 40.8 9.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.9 6.1 33.1 11.6 40.8 9.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 152 72 263 38 83 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #338 152 457 95 158 68
Internal Link Dist (ft) 250 340 542
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 70
Base Capacity (vph) 473 1541 997 870 477 641
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.69 0.29 0.61 0.23 0.36 0.48
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
884
Queues
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 2
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 479 90 24 757 143 118 15 17
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.52 0.11 0.09 0.76 0.47 0.29 0.05 0.05
Control Delay 33.9 13.3 5.3 33.3 16.8 29.5 20.7 24.4 16.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 33.9 13.3 5.3 33.3 16.8 29.5 20.7 24.4 16.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 68 4 6 136 34 20 3 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 21 262 32 41 504 108 73 21 16
Internal Link Dist (ft) 900 1182 394 340
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 45 160 85
Base Capacity (vph) 550 1781 1482 550 1778 653 843 605 781 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.27 0.06 0.04 0.43 0.22 0.14 0.02 0.02 Intersection Summary
885
Queues
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 15 450 48 33 771 67 76 33 35
v/c Ratio 0.05 0.41 0.05 0.10 0.66 0.22 0.18 0.11 0.09
Control Delay 27.9 11.7 0.9 27.1 13.9 22.3 7.9 21.5 11.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 27.9 11.7 0.9 27.1 13.9 22.3 7.9 21.5 11.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 50 0 7 111 14 0 7 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 26 245 6 43 #505 47 18 27 15
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1182 815 519 242
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 75 210 100 105
Base Capacity (vph) 771 1623 1362 771 1615 613 754 592 732 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.28 0.04 0.04 0.48 0.11 0.10 0.06 0.05 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
886
Queues
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 4
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 256 157 189 33 302 139 401 512 58 182 193 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.11 0.25 0.30 0.66 0.29 0.76 0.42 0.43 0.52 0.59 Control Delay 62.4 24.6 4.5 70.7 52.2 9.9 51.8 35.2 71.0 62.7 15.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.4 24.6 4.5 70.7 52.2 9.9 51.8 35.2 71.0 62.7 15.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 198 43 0 26 222 5 291 170 46 75 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 340 76 49 67 355 52 434 242 100 128 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 827 1040 742 1086
Turn Bay Length (ft) 525 255 120 450 165 100
Base Capacity (vph) 527 1704 849 301 634 617 678 1650 452 1205 666 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.09 0.22 0.11 0.48 0.23 0.59 0.31 0.13 0.15 0.29 Intersection Summary
887
Queues
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 822 399 203 255 334
v/c Ratio 0.57 0.73 0.67 0.35 0.65 0.56
Control Delay 33.0 13.8 25.7 9.6 33.8 7.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 33.0 13.8 25.7 9.6 33.8 7.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 189 125 20 86 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 167 390 270 77 211 67
Internal Link Dist (ft) 250 340 542
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 70
Base Capacity (vph) 593 1715 1248 1087 597 742
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.48 0.32 0.19 0.43 0.45
Intersection Summary
888
Queues
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 2
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 899 135 30 511 100 63 53 76
v/c Ratio 0.05 0.72 0.13 0.12 0.38 0.39 0.18 0.20 0.21
Control Delay 47.5 17.1 5.5 46.1 7.3 41.3 17.4 38.1 29.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 47.5 17.1 5.5 46.1 7.3 41.3 17.4 38.1 29.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 334 16 13 76 44 6 23 23
Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 686 50 56 266 122 45 69 74
Internal Link Dist (ft) 900 1182 394 340
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 45 160 85
Base Capacity (vph) 523 1676 1388 523 1672 594 775 605 798 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.54 0.10 0.06 0.31 0.17 0.08 0.09 0.10 Intersection Summary
889
Queues
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 939 49 66 465 41 51 51 54
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.77 0.05 0.35 0.34 0.28 0.11 0.35 0.25
Control Delay 34.9 19.4 0.8 36.4 7.1 35.8 0.4 37.8 13.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 34.9 19.4 0.8 36.4 7.1 35.8 0.4 37.8 13.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 313 0 28 51 17 0 22 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 #678 5 66 188 44 0 41 18
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1182 815 519 242
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 75 210 100 105
Base Capacity (vph) 399 1222 1046 399 1349 303 624 304 399 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.77 0.05 0.17 0.34 0.14 0.08 0.17 0.14 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
890
Queues
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 4
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 324 331 442 34 162 97 185 249 156 469 283 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.22 0.48 0.29 0.49 0.26 0.62 0.30 0.62 0.63 0.64 Control Delay 48.2 24.3 4.6 62.6 50.3 6.0 55.3 36.9 59.4 45.5 27.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.2 24.3 4.6 62.6 50.3 6.0 55.3 36.9 59.4 45.5 27.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 204 83 0 23 105 0 123 75 106 160 86 Queue Length 95th (ft) 397 154 75 67 209 28 239 135 211 262 211 Internal Link Dist (ft) 827 1040 742 1086
Turn Bay Length (ft) 525 255 120 450 165 100
Base Capacity (vph) 585 1838 1024 334 703 663 752 1823 501 1336 678 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.18 0.43 0.10 0.23 0.15 0.25 0.14 0.31 0.35 0.42 Intersection Summary
891
PM peak hour

Minor Street Volume = 31 VPH
Major Street Volume = 1545 VPH
A signal is not warranted
Source: CA MUTCD 2014, Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies, Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals, Figure 4C-3
Peak Hour Warrant (Urban Areas)
Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Scenario: Existing Conditions
892
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 46
Appendix C – Existing plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
893
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 287 410 598 199 165 285
Future Volume (veh/h) 287 410 598 199 165 285
Number 5 2 6 16 7 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 326 466 616 205 179 310
Adj No. of Lanes 111111
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 363 1227 736 609 385 344
Arrive On Green 0.20 0.66 0.40 0.40 0.22 0.22
Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1863 1541 1774 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 326 466 616 205 179 310
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1863 1541 1774 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 15.2 9.6 25.3 7.9 7.4 16.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.2 9.6 25.3 7.9 7.4 16.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 363 1227 736 609 385 344
V/C Ratio(X) 0.90 0.38 0.84 0.34 0.46 0.90
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 419 1430 880 728 419 374
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.8 6.6 23.1 17.9 28.9 32.3
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.7 0.2 6.1 0.3 0.5 22.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.3 5.0 14.3 3.4 3.7 15.1
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.5 6.8 29.3 18.2 29.3 54.6
LnGrp LOS D A C B C D
Approach Vol, veh/h 792 821 489
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.2 26.5 45.3
Approach LOS C C D
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 60.8 23.9 22.3 38.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 20.0 20.0 40.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.6 18.1 17.2 27.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 10.1 0.2 0.2 6.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 30.4
HCM 2010 LOS C
Notes
894
HCM 2010 TWSC
2: Woodborough Place/Driveway & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 527 8 1 819 0 13 0 4 4 0 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 527 8 1 819 0 13 0 4 4 0 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 98 98 98 85 85 85 44 44 44
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 592 9 1 836 0 15 0 5 9 0 7
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 836 0 0 601 0 0 1435 1435 597 1437 1439 838 Stage 1 - - - - - - 597 597 - 838 838 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 838 838 - 599 601 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 798 - - 976 - - 111 134 503 111 133 366 Stage 1 - - - - - - 490 491 - 361 382 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 361 382 - 488 489 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 796 - - 976 - - 109 134 503 110 133 365 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 109 134 - 110 133 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 490 491 - 361 381 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 353 381 - 483 489 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 36.5 29.7

HCM LOS E D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 134 796 - - 976 - - 110 365
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149 - - - 0.001 - - 0.083 0.019
HCM Control Delay (s) 36.5 0 - - 8.7 0 - 40.7 15.1
HCM Lane LOS E A - - A A - E C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 0.1
895
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 452 82 24 713 9 103 47 40 14 4 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 452 82 24 713 9 103 47 40 14 4 9 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 497 90 26 767 10 143 65 56 18 5 12 Adj No. of Lanes 111110110110
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.78 0.78 0.78 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 29 919 780 75 952 12 347 145 125 260 76 183
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.52 0.52 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1582 1774 1834 24 1369 918 791 1252 481 1156 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 497 90 26 0 777 143 0 121 18 0 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1582 1774 0 1858 1369 0 1708 1252 0 1637 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 9.3 1.5 0.7 0.0 17.5 5.0 0.0 3.2 0.7 0.0 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 9.3 1.5 0.7 0.0 17.5 5.5 0.0 3.2 3.9 0.0 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.71
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 29 919 780 75 0 965 347 0 270 260 0 259 V/C Ratio(X) 0.31 0.54 0.12 0.35 0.00 0.81 0.41 0.00 0.45 0.07 0.00 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 526 2907 2468 526 0 2899 752 0 776 631 0 744 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 8.9 6.9 23.6 0.0 10.1 20.5 0.0 19.3 21.1 0.0 18.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 4.7 0.7 0.4 0.0 9.0 1.9 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.8 9.0 6.9 24.6 0.0 10.7 20.7 0.0 19.7 21.1 0.0 18.2 LnGrp LOS C A A C B C B C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 596 803 264 35
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.0 11.1 20.3 19.7
Approach LOS A B C B
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 30.5 13.0 5.8 31.8 13.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 79.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 11.3 5.9 2.3 19.5 7.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.8 0.6 0.0 6.8 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.0
HCM 2010 LOS B
896
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 19 457 49 29 667 21 48 1 52 22 3 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 19 457 49 29 667 21 48 1 52 22 3 24 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 19 466 50 33 767 24 70 1 75 33 5 36 Adj No. of Lanes 1 11110110110
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.66 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 50 930 774 79 927 29 281 3 188 249 24 170
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.52 0.52 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1550 1774 1797 56 1356 21 1559 1314 196 1411 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 19 466 50 33 0 791 70 0 76 33 0 41 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1863 1550 1774 0 1853 1356 0 1580 1314 0 1607 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 8.1 0.8 0.9 0.0 17.4 2.4 0.0 2.1 1.1 0.0 1.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 8.1 0.8 0.9 0.0 17.4 3.5 0.0 2.1 3.3 0.0 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.88
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 50 930 774 79 0 956 281 0 190 249 0 194 V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.50 0.06 0.42 0.00 0.83 0.25 0.00 0.40 0.13 0.00 0.21 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 551 1621 1349 551 0 1612 539 0 491 499 0 499 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.0 8.1 6.2 22.5 0.0 9.9 20.7 0.0 19.6 21.1 0.0 19.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.2 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 4.1 0.3 0.5 0.0 9.0 0.9 0.0 1.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.8 8.2 6.3 23.8 0.0 10.6 20.9 0.0 20.1 21.2 0.0 19.4 LnGrp LOS C A A C B C C C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 535 824 146 74
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.6 11.1 20.5 20.2
Approach LOS A B C C
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.2 30.1 10.9 6.4 30.9 10.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.1 6.0 5.1 5.1 6.0 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s15.0 42.0 15.0 15.0 42.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.9 10.1 5.3 2.5 19.4 5.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.8 0.4 0.0 5.5 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.6
HCM 2010 LOS B
Notes
897
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 249 152 182 28 261 118 325 398 11 49 155 173 Future Volume (veh/h) 249 152 182 28 261 118 325 398 11 49 155 173 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 265 162 0 33 307 0 406 498 14 58 182 204 Adj No. of Lanes 1 21111120121
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 299 1314 588 51 432 367 449 1355 38 76 619 277 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.37 0.00 0.03 0.23 0.00 0.25 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3515 99 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 265 162 0 33 307 0 406 250 262 58 182 204 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1844 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.2 3.3 0.0 2.0 16.8 0.0 24.5 11.2 11.2 3.6 4.9 13.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.2 3.3 0.0 2.0 16.8 0.0 24.5 11.2 11.2 3.6 4.9 13.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 299 1314 588 51 432 367 449 682 711 76 619 277 V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.12 0.00 0.65 0.71 0.00 0.90 0.37 0.37 0.77 0.29 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 561 1760 787 321 674 573 722 880 917 481 1280 573 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.0 22.9 0.0 53.1 39.1 0.0 40.0 24.3 24.3 52.4 39.7 43.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.7 0.2 0.0 9.7 9.6 0.0 10.7 0.2 0.2 11.4 0.2 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln8.4 1.7 0.0 1.1 9.8 0.0 13.3 5.5 5.8 2.0 2.4 6.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.7 23.1 0.0 62.8 48.7 0.0 50.6 24.6 24.6 63.8 39.9 46.1 LnGrp LOS D C E D D C C E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 427 340 918 444
Approach Delay, s/veh 40.8 50.0 36.1 45.8
Approach LOS DDDD
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.2 47.6 7.7 46.1 32.5 24.3 23.1 30.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s30.0 55.0 20.0 55.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.6 13.2 4.0 5.3 26.5 15.5 18.2 18.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.9 0.0 9.4 1.5 3.7 0.5 6.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 41.3
HCM 2010 LOS D
898
HCM 2010 TWSC
6: Buchanan Rd. & Driveway 1 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 496 728 14 9 8
Future Vol, veh/h 10 496 728 14 9 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 539 791 15 10 9
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 807 0 - 0 1360 799
Stage 1 - - - - 799 -
Stage 2 - - - - 561 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 818 - - - 164 386
Stage 1 - - - - 443 -
Stage 2 - - - - 571 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 818 - - - 161 386
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 161 -
Stage 1 - - - - 443 -
Stage 2 - - - - 560 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 22.7

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 818 - - - 222
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.083
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 0 - - 22.7
HCM Lane LOS A A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.3
899
HCM 2010 TWSC
7: Buchanan Rd. & Driveway 2 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 495 730 9 13 12
Future Vol, veh/h 10 495 730 9 13 12
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 538 793 10 14 13
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 803 0 - 0 1358 798
Stage 1 - - - - 798 -
Stage 2 - - - - 560 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 821 - - - 164 386
Stage 1 - - - - 443 -
Stage 2 - - - - 572 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 821 - - - 161 386
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 161 -
Stage 1 - - - - 443 -
Stage 2 - - - - 561 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 23.3

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 821 - - - 224
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.121
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 0 - - 23.3
HCM Lane LOS A A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4
900
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 186 786 372 189 241 307
Future Volume (veh/h) 186 786 372 189 241 307
Number 5 2 6 16 7 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 198 836 413 210 262 334
Adj No. of Lanes 111111
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 246 1107 704 584 432 385
Arrive On Green 0.14 0.59 0.38 0.38 0.24 0.24
Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1863 1545 1774 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 198 836 413 210 262 334
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1863 1545 1774 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 21.3 11.4 6.3 8.5 13.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 21.3 11.4 6.3 8.5 13.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 246 1107 704 584 432 385
V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.76 0.59 0.36 0.61 0.87
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 549 1875 1154 957 549 490
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.0 9.7 16.1 14.5 21.7 23.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.4 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.7 11.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.6 11.0 6.0 2.7 4.2 11.7
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.3 10.7 16.8 14.8 22.4 34.6
LnGrp LOS C B B B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1034 623 596
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.5 16.2 29.3
Approach LOS B B C
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.4 21.2 14.0 29.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 20.0 20.0 40.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 23.3 15.1 9.0 13.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 12.7 0.7 0.2 10.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.9
HCM 2010 LOS B
Notes
901
HCM 2010 TWSC
2: Woodborough Place/Driveway & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1013 11 2 557 0 6 0 2 23 0 8
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1013 11 2 557 0 6 0 2 23 0 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 93 93 93 50 50 50 46 46 46
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 1044 11 2 599 0 12 0 4 50 0 17
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 599 0 0 1056 0 0 1653 1653 1051 1655 1659 601 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1050 1050 - 603 603 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 603 603 - 1052 1056 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 978 - - 659 - - 78 98 276 78 98 500
Stage 1 - - - - - - 275 304 - 486 488 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 486 488 - 274 302 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 976 - - 658 - - 75 98 276 77 98 499
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 75 98 - 77 98 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 275 304 - 486 486 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 466 486 - 270 302 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 52.2 87.7

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 92 976 - - 658 - - 77 499
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.174 - - - 0.003 - - 0.649 0.035
HCM Control Delay (s) 52.2 0 - - 10.5 0 - 113.9 12.5
HCM Lane LOS F A - - B A - F B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0 - - 3 0.1
902
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 12 909 134 29 460 22 84 13 43 46 37 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 12 909 134 29 460 22 84 13 43 46 37 24 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 918 135 32 511 24 100 15 51 57 46 30 Adj No. of Lanes 111110110110
Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.81 0.81 0.81 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 37 1069 906 83 1059 50 252 55 189 257 157 103 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.57 0.57 0.05 0.60 0.60 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1579 1774 1765 83 1308 370 1257 1319 1049 684 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 918 135 32 0 535 100 0 66 57 0 76 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1579 1774 0 1848 1308 0 1626 1319 0 1734 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 28.0 2.7 1.2 0.0 11.0 5.0 0.0 2.4 2.7 0.0 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 28.0 2.7 1.2 0.0 11.0 7.6 0.0 2.4 5.1 0.0 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.39
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 37 1069 906 83 0 1108 252 0 244 257 0 260 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.86 0.15 0.39 0.00 0.48 0.40 0.00 0.27 0.22 0.00 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 394 2177 1846 394 0 2160 501 0 553 508 0 590 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.6 12.1 6.7 31.3 0.0 7.6 28.9 0.0 25.4 27.7 0.0 25.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.8 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 14.5 1.2 0.6 0.0 5.5 1.8 0.0 1.1 1.0 0.0 1.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.5 12.9 6.7 32.4 0.0 7.7 29.3 0.0 25.7 27.9 0.0 25.8 LnGrp LOS C B A C A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1065 567 166 133
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.4 9.1 27.9 26.7
Approach LOS B A C C
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 44.3 15.1 6.4 46.0 15.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 79.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 30.0 7.1 2.5 13.0 9.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.8 0.6 0.0 8.9 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 13.7
HCM 2010 LOS B
903
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 35 921 49 61 424 29 37 0 43 34 2 38 Future Volume (veh/h) 35 921 49 61 424 29 37 0 43 34 2 38 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 36 959 51 66 456 31 44 0 51 51 3 57 Adj No. of Lanes 1 11110110110
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.67 0.67 0.67 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 79 1067 906 116 1022 69 204 0 160 212 8 153
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.57 0.57 0.07 0.59 0.59 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1582 1774 1722 117 1337 0 1583 1348 80 1516 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 36 959 51 66 0 487 44 0 51 51 0 60 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1863 1582 1774 0 1839 1337 0 1583 1348 0 1595 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 28.2 0.9 2.2 0.0 9.1 2.0 0.0 1.9 2.3 0.0 2.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 28.2 0.9 2.2 0.0 9.1 4.2 0.0 1.9 4.1 0.0 2.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 79 1067 906 116 0 1092 204 0 160 212 0 161 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.90 0.06 0.57 0.00 0.45 0.22 0.00 0.32 0.24 0.00 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 428 1258 1069 428 0 1242 391 0 382 401 0 385 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.0 11.7 5.9 28.2 0.0 7.0 28.0 0.0 26.0 27.9 0.0 26.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 7.3 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 16.3 0.4 1.2 0.0 4.6 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.0 1.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.5 19.0 5.9 29.8 0.0 7.1 28.2 0.0 26.4 28.1 0.0 26.6 LnGrp LOS C B A C A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1046 553 95 111
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.7 9.8 27.2 27.3
Approach LOS B A C C
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.2 41.6 11.4 7.9 42.9 11.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.1 6.0 5.1 5.1 6.0 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s15.0 42.0 15.0 15.0 42.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.2 30.2 6.1 3.2 11.1 6.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.4 0.3 0.0 7.9 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 17.0
HCM 2010 LOS B
Notes
904
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 321 323 429 30 149 86 173 215 12 145 436 273 Future Volume (veh/h) 321 323 429 30 149 86 173 215 12 145 436 273 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 334 336 0 34 167 0 190 236 13 156 469 294 Adj No. of Lanes 1 21111120121
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 375 1342 600 56 371 316 235 926 51 193 877 386 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.38 0.00 0.03 0.20 0.00 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3412 187 1774 3539 1557 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 334 336 0 34 167 0 190 122 127 156 469 294 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1830 1774 1770 1557 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.6 5.9 0.0 1.7 7.2 0.0 9.5 4.9 5.0 7.8 10.5 15.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.6 5.9 0.0 1.7 7.2 0.0 9.5 4.9 5.0 7.8 10.5 15.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 375 1342 600 56 371 316 235 480 497 193 877 386 V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.25 0.00 0.60 0.45 0.00 0.81 0.25 0.26 0.81 0.53 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 683 2140 957 390 819 696 878 1070 1106 585 1556 685 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.8 19.4 0.0 43.5 32.0 0.0 38.3 25.9 25.9 39.6 29.7 31.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.6 0.4 0.0 7.5 3.9 0.0 7.7 0.2 0.2 5.9 0.4 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln8.7 3.0 0.0 1.0 4.1 0.0 5.1 2.4 2.5 4.1 5.1 7.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.4 19.8 0.0 51.0 35.9 0.0 46.1 26.1 26.1 45.5 30.1 34.1 LnGrp LOS D B D D DCCDCC
Approach Vol, veh/h 670 201 439 919
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.1 38.5 34.8 34.0
Approach LOS CDCC
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s14.4 29.7 7.4 39.5 16.6 27.5 23.7 23.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s30.0 55.0 20.0 55.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s9.8 7.0 3.7 7.9 11.5 17.9 18.6 9.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.8 0.0 9.9 0.7 4.4 0.6 8.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 33.4
HCM 2010 LOS C
905
HCM 2010 TWSC
6: Buchanan Rd. & Driveway 1 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 988 487 16 10 10
Future Vol, veh/h 10 988 487 16 10 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 1074 529 17 11 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 547 0 - 0 1634 538
Stage 1 - - - - 538 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1096 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1022 - - - 111 543
Stage 1 - - - - 585 -
Stage 2 - - - - 320 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1022 - - - 108 543
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 108 -
Stage 1 - - - - 585 -
Stage 2 - - - - 311 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 27.7

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1022 - - - 180
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - - - 0.121
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 0 - - 27.7
HCM Lane LOS A A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4
906
HCM 2010 TWSC
7: Buchanan Rd. & Driveway 2 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 983 489 10 16 14
Future Vol, veh/h 15 983 489 10 16 14
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 16 1068 532 11 17 15
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 542 0 - 0 1638 537
Stage 1 - - - - 537 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1101 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1027 - - - 111 544
Stage 1 - - - - 586 -
Stage 2 - - - - 318 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1027 - - - 107 544
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 107 -
Stage 1 - - - - 586 -
Stage 2 - - - - 306 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 30.9

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1027 - - - 171
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - - 0.191
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 0 - - 30.9
HCM Lane LOS A A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.7
907
Queues
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 326 466 616 205 179 310
v/c Ratio 0.80 0.36 0.83 0.31 0.60 0.60
Control Delay 48.2 6.2 33.1 11.7 41.7 9.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 48.2 6.2 33.1 11.7 41.7 9.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 155 76 272 40 87 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #338 158 #477 98 162 68
Internal Link Dist (ft) 250 340 542
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 70
Base Capacity (vph) 463 1522 977 854 467 634
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.31 0.63 0.24 0.38 0.49
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
908
Queues
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 2
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 497 90 26 777 143 121 18 17
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.53 0.11 0.10 0.77 0.47 0.30 0.06 0.05
Control Delay 34.8 13.5 5.3 34.1 17.1 30.3 21.3 25.3 16.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 34.8 13.5 5.3 34.1 17.1 30.3 21.3 25.3 16.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 73 4 7 144 35 22 4 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 275 32 44 523 111 76 25 17
Internal Link Dist (ft) 900 528 394 340
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 45 160 85
Base Capacity (vph) 540 1775 1476 540 1771 641 827 592 767 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.28 0.06 0.05 0.44 0.22 0.15 0.03 0.02 Intersection Summary
909
Queues
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 466 50 33 791 70 76 33 41
v/c Ratio 0.07 0.41 0.05 0.11 0.65 0.24 0.19 0.12 0.11
Control Delay 30.3 11.1 1.0 29.6 13.8 24.7 8.4 23.6 11.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 30.3 11.1 1.0 29.6 13.8 24.7 8.4 23.6 11.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 4 53 0 8 118 16 0 7 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 257 7 43 #565 49 18 27 15
Internal Link Dist (ft) 344 815 519 242
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 75 210 100 105
Base Capacity (vph) 712 1542 1298 712 1533 565 705 549 681 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.30 0.04 0.05 0.52 0.12 0.11 0.06 0.06 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
910
Queues
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 4
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 265 162 194 33 307 139 406 512 58 182 204 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.11 0.25 0.31 0.67 0.29 0.77 0.42 0.43 0.53 0.61 Control Delay 63.3 24.7 4.4 71.7 53.4 10.3 52.8 35.7 72.3 63.8 16.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 63.3 24.7 4.4 71.7 53.4 10.3 52.8 35.7 72.3 63.8 16.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 211 45 0 27 234 6 303 174 47 77 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 352 78 50 67 361 54 441 242 100 128 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 827 1040 742 1086
Turn Bay Length (ft) 525 255 120 450 165 100
Base Capacity (vph) 515 1677 842 294 620 605 663 1614 441 1178 663 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.10 0.23 0.11 0.50 0.23 0.61 0.32 0.13 0.15 0.31 Intersection Summary
911
Queues
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 836 413 210 262 334
v/c Ratio 0.57 0.74 0.68 0.35 0.66 0.55
Control Delay 34.0 14.2 26.1 9.8 34.7 7.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 34.0 14.2 26.1 9.8 34.7 7.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 70 202 134 23 91 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 170 401 282 82 220 68
Internal Link Dist (ft) 250 340 542
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 70
Base Capacity (vph) 579 1703 1219 1064 583 732
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.49 0.34 0.20 0.45 0.46
Intersection Summary
912
Queues
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 2
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 918 135 32 535 100 66 57 76
v/c Ratio 0.05 0.73 0.13 0.13 0.39 0.40 0.18 0.22 0.22
Control Delay 48.2 17.5 5.5 46.8 7.4 42.1 17.3 39.0 29.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 48.2 17.5 5.5 46.8 7.4 42.1 17.3 39.0 29.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 350 16 15 82 46 6 25 24
Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 721 50 60 283 122 45 73 73
Internal Link Dist (ft) 900 508 394 340
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 45 160 85
Base Capacity (vph) 510 1665 1380 510 1660 578 756 587 777 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.55 0.10 0.06 0.32 0.17 0.09 0.10 0.10 Intersection Summary
913
Queues
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 36 959 51 66 487 44 51 51 60
v/c Ratio 0.21 0.78 0.05 0.35 0.36 0.30 0.11 0.35 0.27
Control Delay 35.1 20.2 0.9 36.4 7.4 36.5 0.4 37.8 13.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 35.1 20.2 0.9 36.4 7.4 36.5 0.4 37.8 13.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 327 0 28 54 19 0 22 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 #701 6 66 202 47 0 41 18
Internal Link Dist (ft) 354 815 519 242
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 75 210 100 105
Base Capacity (vph) 399 1222 1046 399 1347 301 621 304 403 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.78 0.05 0.17 0.36 0.15 0.08 0.17 0.15 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
914
Queues
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Existing plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 4
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 334 336 447 34 167 97 190 249 156 469 294 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.22 0.48 0.29 0.51 0.26 0.63 0.30 0.63 0.64 0.53 Control Delay 48.3 24.4 4.6 63.8 51.5 6.0 56.6 37.6 61.1 46.8 8.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.3 24.4 4.6 63.8 51.5 6.0 56.6 37.6 61.1 46.8 8.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 215 85 0 24 112 0 131 78 109 166 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #434 157 75 68 215 28 247 135 213 265 79 Internal Link Dist (ft) 827 1040 742 1086
Turn Bay Length (ft) 525 255 120 450 165
Base Capacity (vph) 567 1784 1009 324 682 647 730 1770 486 1297 755 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.19 0.44 0.10 0.24 0.15 0.26 0.14 0.32 0.36 0.39 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
915
AM peak hour
PM peak hour

Minor Street Volume = 17
(31) VPH
Major Street Volume = 1355 (1583) VPH
A signal is not warranted for
both A.M. & P.M. Peak Hour
Source: CA MUTCD 2014, Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies, Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals, Figure 4C-3
Peak Hour Warrant (Urban Areas)
Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Scenario: Existing plus Project Conditions
916
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 47
Appendix D – Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
917
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 295 313 868 336 203 208
Future Volume (veh/h) 295 313 868 336 203 208
Number 5 2 6 16 7 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 295 313 868 336 203 208
Adj No. of Lanes 111111
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 326 1381 944 782 271 242
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.74 0.51 0.51 0.15 0.15
Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1863 1543 1774 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 295 313 868 336 203 208
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1863 1543 1774 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 16.2 5.2 42.7 13.6 10.9 12.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.2 5.2 42.7 13.6 10.9 12.7
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 326 1381 944 782 271 242
V/C Ratio(X) 0.90 0.23 0.92 0.43 0.75 0.86
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 357 1472 1003 831 375 335
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.7 4.0 22.6 15.4 40.2 41.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.3 0.1 12.7 0.4 3.6 12.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.1 2.6 25.0 5.9 5.6 11.4
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 63.0 4.1 35.3 15.8 43.8 53.5
LnGrp LOS E A D B D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 608 1204 411
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.7 29.8 48.7
Approach LOS C C D
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 78.6 20.7 23.3 55.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 78.5 21.0 20.0 53.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.2 14.7 18.2 44.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 14.1 0.5 0.1 5.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 34.1
HCM 2010 LOS C
Notes
918
HCM 2010 TWSC
2: Woodborough Place/Driveway & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 506 10 1 1184 0 16 0 5 5 0 4
Future Vol, veh/h 0 506 10 1 1184 0 16 0 5 5 0 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 506 10 1 1184 0 16 0 5 5 0 4
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1184 0 0 516 0 0 1697 1697 511 1700 1702 1186 Stage 1 - - - - - - 511 511 - 1186 1186 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1186 1186 - 514 516 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 590 - - 1050 - - 73 92 563 73 92 230 Stage 1 - - - - - - 545 537 - 230 262 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 230 262 - 543 534 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 589 - - 1050 - - 71 92 563 72 92 230 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 71 92 - 72 92 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 545 537 - 230 261 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 225 261 - 538 534 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 56.8 41.9

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 90 589 - - 1050 - - 72 230
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.233 - - - 0.001 - - 0.069 0.017
HCM Control Delay (s) 56.8 0 - - 8.4 0 - 58.7 20.9
HCM Lane LOS F A - - A A - F C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 0.1
919
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 444 73 31 1037 12 156 118 59 15 11 19 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 444 73 31 1037 12 156 118 59 15 11 19 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 444 73 31 1037 12 156 118 59 15 11 19 Adj No. of Lanes 111110110110
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 31 1096 930 79 1130 13 295 190 95 177 99 171 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.59 0.59 0.04 0.61 0.61 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1582 1774 1837 21 1355 1166 583 1192 608 1050 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 10 444 73 31 0 1049 156 0 177 15 0 30 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1582 1774 0 1858 1355 0 1749 1192 0 1658 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 9.7 1.5 1.3 0.0 37.7 8.4 0.0 7.1 0.9 0.0 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 9.7 1.5 1.3 0.0 37.7 9.6 0.0 7.1 8.0 0.0 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.63
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 31 1096 930 79 0 1143 295 0 284 177 0 270 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.41 0.08 0.39 0.00 0.92 0.53 0.00 0.62 0.08 0.00 0.11 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 164 1342 1140 164 0 1339 486 0 532 345 0 504 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.7 8.4 6.7 35.1 0.0 12.9 31.1 0.0 29.5 33.2 0.0 27.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.0 8.6 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 5.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 21.7 3.2 0.0 3.5 0.3 0.0 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.9 8.5 6.7 36.3 0.0 21.5 31.6 0.0 30.3 33.3 0.0 27.1 LnGrp LOS D A A D C C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 527 1080 333 45
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.8 21.9 30.9 29.2
Approach LOS A C C C
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.3 50.0 17.3 6.3 52.0 17.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 54.5 23.0 7.0 54.5 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 11.7 10.0 2.4 39.7 11.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.6 0.8 0.0 6.8 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.1
HCM 2010 LOS C
920
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 18 443 57 35 1000 25 56 1 63 27 4 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 18 443 57 35 1000 25 56 1 63 27 4 24 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 18 443 57 35 1000 25 56 1 63 27 4 26 Adj No. of Lanes 1 11110110110
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 46 1133 943 77 1133 28 219 2 147 188 20 132
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.61 0.61 0.04 0.63 0.63 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1551 1774 1810 45 1368 25 1554 1327 214 1394 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 18 443 57 35 0 1025 56 0 64 27 0 30 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1863 1551 1774 0 1855 1368 0 1579 1327 0 1608 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 7.8 1.0 1.2 0.0 29.5 2.5 0.0 2.4 1.3 0.0 1.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 7.8 1.0 1.2 0.0 29.5 3.6 0.0 2.4 3.7 0.0 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.87
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 46 1133 943 77 0 1161 219 0 150 188 0 152 V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.39 0.06 0.45 0.00 0.88 0.26 0.00 0.43 0.14 0.00 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 169 3011 2506 258 0 3091 545 0 527 505 0 536 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 6.4 5.1 29.8 0.0 10.0 28.3 0.0 27.3 29.0 0.0 26.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 0.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 4.0 0.4 0.6 0.0 15.1 1.0 0.0 1.1 0.5 0.0 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.7 6.5 5.1 31.3 0.0 10.9 28.6 0.0 28.0 29.1 0.0 26.9 LnGrp LOS C A A C B C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 518 1060 120 57
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.3 11.6 28.3 28.0
Approach LOS A B C C
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.9 44.8 11.1 6.7 46.0 11.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.1 6.0 5.1 5.1 6.0 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s9.3 103.2 21.3 6.1 106.4 21.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.2 9.8 5.7 2.6 31.5 5.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.5 0.3 0.0 8.5 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.0
HCM 2010 LOS B
Notes
921
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 425 244 37 27 384 433 416 699 58 43 197 148 Future Volume (veh/h) 425 244 37 27 384 433 416 699 58 43 197 148 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 425 244 0 27 384 0 416 699 58 43 197 148 Adj No. of Lanes 1 21111120121
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 446 1561 698 43 398 338 437 1168 97 55 490 219 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.44 0.00 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.25 0.35 0.35 0.03 0.14 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3306 274 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 425 244 0 27 384 0 416 374 383 43 197 148 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1810 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 29.8 5.2 0.0 1.9 25.8 0.0 29.2 21.9 21.9 3.0 6.4 11.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 29.8 5.2 0.0 1.9 25.8 0.0 29.2 21.9 21.9 3.0 6.4 11.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 446 1561 698 43 398 338 437 625 639 55 490 219 V/C Ratio(X) 0.95 0.16 0.00 0.63 0.96 0.00 0.95 0.60 0.60 0.78 0.40 0.68 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 446 1561 698 88 398 338 437 676 692 125 731 327 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.5 21.2 0.0 61.1 49.2 0.0 46.9 33.5 33.5 60.8 49.7 51.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 30.5 0.2 0.0 10.7 37.1 0.0 31.3 1.1 1.0 15.8 0.4 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln18.4 2.6 0.0 1.1 17.3 0.0 18.1 10.9 11.1 1.7 3.2 5.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 77.1 21.4 0.0 71.8 86.4 0.0 78.3 34.6 34.6 76.6 50.1 54.4 LnGrp LOS E C E F E C C E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 669 411 1173 388
Approach Delay, s/veh 56.8 85.4 50.1 54.7
Approach LOS E F D D
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.4 49.6 7.6 60.7 35.6 22.5 36.3 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s8.9 48.3 6.3 52.5 31.1 26.1 31.8 27.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.0 23.9 3.9 7.2 31.2 13.2 31.8 27.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.1 0.0 13.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 57.9
HCM 2010 LOS E
922
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 151 846 350 255 427 291
Future Volume (veh/h) 151 846 350 255 427 291
Number 5 2 6 16 7 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 151 846 350 255 427 291
Adj No. of Lanes 111111
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 215 1023 644 534 493 440
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.55 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.28
Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1863 1544 1774 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 151 846 350 255 427 291
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1863 1544 1774 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 22.8 9.2 7.9 13.9 9.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 22.8 9.2 7.9 13.9 9.9
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 215 1023 644 534 493 440
V/C Ratio(X) 0.70 0.83 0.54 0.48 0.87 0.66
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 263 1281 852 707 663 591
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.6 11.3 16.0 15.6 20.9 19.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.7 3.7 0.7 0.7 7.8 0.9
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.7 12.6 4.8 3.4 7.8 8.5
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.3 15.0 16.7 16.2 28.7 20.3
LnGrp LOS C B B B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 997 605 718
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.4 16.5 25.3
Approach LOS B B C
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 38.4 22.4 12.4 26.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 41.8 22.7 9.0 27.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 24.8 15.9 7.0 11.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 8.6 1.0 0.0 8.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 19.6
HCM 2010 LOS B
Notes
923
HCM 2010 TWSC
2: Woodborough Place/Driveway & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1260 13 2 588 0 7 0 2 28 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1260 13 2 588 0 7 0 2 28 0 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 1260 13 2 588 0 7 0 2 28 0 10
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 588 0 0 1273 0 0 1859 1859 1268 1860 1865 590 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1267 1267 - 592 592 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 592 592 - 1268 1273 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 987 - - 546 - - 56 73 206 56 73 508
Stage 1 - - - - - - 207 240 - 493 494 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 493 494 - 207 238 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 985 - - 545 - - 55 73 206 55 73 507
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 55 73 - 55 73 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 207 240 - 493 492 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 480 492 - 205 238 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 68 95.2

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 66 985 - - 545 - - 55 507
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.136 - - - 0.004 - - 0.509 0.02
HCM Control Delay (s) 68 0 - - 11.6 0 - 124.9 12.2
HCM Lane LOS F A - - B A - F B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0 - - 2 0.1
924
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 7 1153 147 55 524 12 105 23 68 199 104 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 7 1153 147 55 524 12 105 23 68 199 104 18 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 7 1153 147 55 524 12 105 23 68 199 104 18 Adj No. of Lanes 111110110110
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 22 1167 989 88 1203 28 231 80 237 250 300 52 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.63 0.63 0.05 0.66 0.66 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1580 1774 1814 42 1257 413 1222 1292 1546 268 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 7 1153 147 55 0 536 105 0 91 199 0 122 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1580 1774 0 1855 1257 0 1636 1292 0 1813 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 72.1 4.6 3.6 0.0 16.2 9.3 0.0 5.6 17.4 0.0 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 72.1 4.6 3.6 0.0 16.2 16.3 0.0 5.6 23.0 0.0 6.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 22 1167 989 88 0 1231 231 0 317 250 0 351 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.99 0.15 0.63 0.00 0.44 0.45 0.00 0.29 0.80 0.00 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 105 1169 991 105 0 1231 231 0 317 250 0 351 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.1 21.8 9.1 55.3 0.0 9.5 48.4 0.0 40.8 51.1 0.0 41.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 23.4 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.2 15.2 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 44.1 2.0 1.9 0.0 8.2 3.3 0.0 2.6 7.5 0.0 3.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.3 45.1 9.2 59.7 0.0 9.5 48.9 0.0 41.0 66.3 0.0 41.6 LnGrp LOS E D A E A D D E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1307 591 196 321
Approach Delay, s/veh 41.2 14.2 45.2 56.9
Approach LOS D B D E
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.9 79.8 28.0 6.4 84.2 28.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 74.5 23.0 7.0 74.5 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 74.1 25.0 2.5 18.2 18.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 13.1 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 37.0
HCM 2010 LOS D
925
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 37 1326 57 74 508 35 42 0 52 41 2 41 Future Volume (veh/h) 37 1326 57 74 508 35 42 0 52 41 2 41 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 37 1326 57 74 508 35 42 0 52 41 2 41 Adj No. of Lanes 1 11110110110
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 61 1384 1175 94 1310 90 128 0 125 120 6 120
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.74 0.74 0.05 0.76 0.76 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1582 1774 1720 119 1358 0 1583 1347 74 1520 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 37 1326 57 74 0 543 42 0 52 41 0 43 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1863 1582 1774 0 1839 1358 0 1583 1347 0 1594 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 82.0 1.2 5.3 0.0 12.9 3.9 0.0 4.0 3.9 0.0 3.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 82.0 1.2 5.3 0.0 12.9 7.2 0.0 4.0 7.9 0.0 3.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 61 1384 1175 94 0 1400 128 0 125 120 0 126 V/C Ratio(X) 0.61 0.96 0.05 0.79 0.00 0.39 0.33 0.00 0.42 0.34 0.00 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 120 1528 1298 96 0 1484 242 0 258 233 0 260 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.5 14.8 4.4 60.4 0.0 5.2 59.7 0.0 56.6 60.4 0.0 56.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.6 13.3 0.0 31.4 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.4 46.3 0.5 3.4 0.0 6.5 1.5 0.0 1.8 1.5 0.0 1.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.1 28.1 4.4 91.8 0.0 5.3 60.2 0.0 57.4 61.0 0.0 56.8 LnGrp LOS E C A F A E E E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1420 617 94 84
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.1 15.6 58.7 58.9
Approach LOS C B E E
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.9 101.8 15.3 9.5 104.2 15.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.1 6.0 5.1 5.1 6.0 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s7.0 105.8 21.0 8.7 104.1 21.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s7.3 84.0 9.9 4.7 14.9 9.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 11.9 0.3 0.0 18.1 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 27.1
HCM 2010 LOS C
Notes
926
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report
TJKM Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 407 504 697 54 247 129 260 409 36 264 603 408 Future Volume (veh/h) 407 504 697 54 247 129 260 409 36 264 603 408 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 407 504 0 54 247 0 260 409 36 264 603 408 Adj No. of Lanes 1 21111120121
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 416 1399 626 69 372 316 279 782 69 279 840 370 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.40 0.00 0.04 0.20 0.00 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3292 289 1774 3539 1557 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 407 504 0 54 247 0 260 219 226 264 603 408 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1811 1774 1770 1557 Q Serve(g_s), s 25.3 11.2 0.0 3.4 13.6 0.0 16.1 12.0 12.1 16.4 17.4 26.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 25.3 11.2 0.0 3.4 13.6 0.0 16.1 12.0 12.1 16.4 17.4 26.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 416 1399 626 69 372 316 279 420 430 279 840 370 V/C Ratio(X) 0.98 0.36 0.00 0.78 0.66 0.00 0.93 0.52 0.53 0.95 0.72 1.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 416 1458 652 101 436 370 279 420 430 279 840 370 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.3 23.7 0.0 52.9 41.1 0.0 46.3 36.9 36.9 46.4 39.0 42.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 38.0 0.7 0.0 17.3 9.0 0.0 36.2 0.9 0.9 39.2 2.8 77.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln16.8 5.6 0.0 2.0 7.9 0.0 10.7 5.9 6.1 11.0 8.9 19.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 80.2 24.4 0.0 70.3 50.1 0.0 82.4 37.8 37.9 85.5 41.8 120.2 LnGrp LOS F C E D F D D F D F
Approach Vol, veh/h 911 301 705 1275
Approach Delay, s/veh 49.4 53.7 54.3 75.9
Approach LOS D D D E
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s22.0 31.4 8.8 48.9 22.0 31.4 30.6 27.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s17.5 26.4 6.3 45.8 17.5 26.4 26.1 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s18.4 14.1 5.4 13.2 18.1 28.4 27.3 15.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.3 0.0 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 61.5
HCM 2010 LOS E
927
AM peak hour
PM peak hour

Minor Street Volume = 21
(38) VPH
Major Street Volume = 1924 (2273) VPH
A signal is not warranted for
both A.M. & P.M. Peak Hour
Source: CA MUTCD 2014, Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies, Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals, Figure 4C-3
Peak Hour Warrant (Urban Areas)
Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Scenario: Cumulative (Year 2035) Conditions
928
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 48
Appendix E – Cumulative (2035) plus Project Conditions
Intersections
Level of Service Worksheets
929
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 295 324 879 341 208 208
Future Volume (veh/h) 295 324 879 341 208 208
Number 5 2 6 16 7 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 295 324 879 341 208 208
Adj No. of Lanes 111111
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 326 1383 948 786 271 242
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.74 0.51 0.51 0.15 0.15
Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1863 1543 1774 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 295 324 879 341 208 208
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1863 1543 1774 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 16.3 5.4 44.0 14.0 11.3 12.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.3 5.4 44.0 14.0 11.3 12.9
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 326 1383 948 786 271 242
V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.23 0.93 0.43 0.77 0.86
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 354 1458 993 823 371 331
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.1 4.0 22.9 15.5 40.8 41.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.9 0.1 13.9 0.4 4.7 12.9
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.2 2.8 26.1 6.0 5.9 11.6
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 64.0 4.1 36.8 15.9 45.4 54.4
LnGrp LOS E A D B D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 619 1220 416
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.6 31.0 49.9
Approach LOS C C D
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 79.5 20.8 23.4 56.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 78.5 21.0 20.0 53.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.4 14.9 18.3 46.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 14.6 0.5 0.1 5.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 34.9
HCM 2010 LOS C
Notes
930
HCM 2010 TWSC
2: Woodborough Place/Driveway & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 522 10 1 1200 0 16 0 5 5 0 4
Future Vol, veh/h 0 522 10 1 1200 0 16 0 5 5 0 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 522 10 1 1200 0 16 0 5 5 0 4
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1200 0 0 532 0 0 1729 1729 527 1732 1734 1202 Stage 1 - - - - - - 527 527 - 1202 1202 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1202 1202 - 530 532 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 582 - - 1036 - - 69 88 551 69 88 225 Stage 1 - - - - - - 535 528 - 225 258 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 225 258 - 533 526 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 581 - - 1036 - - 67 88 551 68 88 225 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 67 88 - 68 88 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 535 528 - 225 257 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 220 257 - 528 526 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 60.7 44

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 85 581 - - 1036 - - 68 225
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.247 - - - 0.001 - - 0.074 0.018
HCM Control Delay (s) 60.7 0 - - 8.5 0 - 62.1 21.3
HCM Lane LOS F A - - A A - F C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 0.1
931
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 460 73 33 1053 14 156 118 61 17 11 19 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 460 73 33 1053 14 156 118 61 17 11 19 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 460 73 33 1053 14 156 118 61 17 11 19 Adj No. of Lanes 111110110110
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 31 1103 937 81 1138 15 291 186 96 172 98 170 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.59 0.59 0.05 0.62 0.62 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1582 1774 1833 24 1355 1151 595 1190 608 1050 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 10 460 73 33 0 1067 156 0 179 17 0 30 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1582 1774 0 1858 1355 0 1747 1190 0 1658 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 10.4 1.5 1.4 0.0 39.7 8.6 0.0 7.4 1.0 0.0 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 10.4 1.5 1.4 0.0 39.7 9.8 0.0 7.4 8.5 0.0 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.63
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 31 1103 937 81 0 1153 291 0 283 172 0 268 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.42 0.08 0.40 0.00 0.93 0.54 0.00 0.63 0.10 0.00 0.11 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 160 1310 1113 160 0 1307 474 0 518 332 0 492 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.6 8.6 6.8 35.9 0.0 13.1 31.9 0.0 30.3 34.3 0.0 27.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.0 9.9 0.6 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 5.3 0.7 0.7 0.0 23.0 3.3 0.0 3.6 0.3 0.0 0.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.8 8.7 6.8 37.1 0.0 23.0 32.5 0.0 31.2 34.4 0.0 27.8 LnGrp LOS D A A D C C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 543 1100 335 47
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.0 23.4 31.8 30.2
Approach LOS A C C C
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.6 51.4 17.5 6.4 53.6 17.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 54.5 23.0 7.0 54.5 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 12.4 10.5 2.4 41.7 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.0 0.8 0.0 6.4 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 21.1
HCM 2010 LOS C
932
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 22 459 59 35 1017 25 58 1 63 27 4 28 Future Volume (veh/h) 22 459 59 35 1017 25 58 1 63 27 4 28 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 459 59 35 1017 25 58 1 63 27 4 30 Adj No. of Lanes 1 11110110110
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 53 1154 961 76 1145 28 212 2 150 185 18 137
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.62 0.62 0.04 0.63 0.63 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1551 1774 1810 45 1363 25 1554 1327 189 1416 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 459 59 35 0 1042 58 0 64 27 0 34 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1863 1551 1774 0 1855 1363 0 1579 1327 0 1604 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 8.4 1.0 1.3 0.0 31.7 2.8 0.0 2.6 1.3 0.0 1.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 8.4 1.0 1.3 0.0 31.7 4.1 0.0 2.6 3.9 0.0 1.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.88
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 53 1154 961 76 0 1173 212 0 153 185 0 155 V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.40 0.06 0.46 0.00 0.89 0.27 0.00 0.42 0.15 0.00 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 161 2859 2380 245 0 2935 512 0 500 477 0 508 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.0 6.5 5.1 31.4 0.0 10.4 29.9 0.0 28.6 30.4 0.0 28.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 0.1 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.4 4.2 0.4 0.7 0.0 16.2 1.0 0.0 1.1 0.5 0.0 0.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.9 6.5 5.1 33.0 0.0 11.3 30.2 0.0 29.3 30.6 0.0 28.3 LnGrp LOS C A A C B C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 540 1077 122 61
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.5 12.0 29.7 29.3
Approach LOS A B C C
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.0 47.7 11.6 7.1 48.5 11.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.1 6.0 5.1 5.1 6.0 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s9.3 103.2 21.3 6.1 106.4 21.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.3 10.4 5.9 2.8 33.7 6.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.9 0.4 0.0 8.8 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.5
HCM 2010 LOS B
Notes
933
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 433 248 41 27 388 433 420 699 58 43 197 157 Future Volume (veh/h) 433 248 41 27 388 433 420 699 58 43 197 157 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 433 248 0 27 388 0 420 699 58 43 197 157 Adj No. of Lanes 1 21111120121
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 444 1553 695 43 396 337 434 1178 98 55 505 226 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.44 0.00 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.24 0.36 0.36 0.03 0.14 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3306 274 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 433 248 0 27 388 0 420 374 383 43 197 157 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1810 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 30.8 5.4 0.0 1.9 26.3 0.0 29.8 21.9 21.9 3.1 6.4 12.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 30.8 5.4 0.0 1.9 26.3 0.0 29.8 21.9 21.9 3.1 6.4 12.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 444 1553 695 43 396 337 434 631 645 55 505 226 V/C Ratio(X) 0.98 0.16 0.00 0.63 0.98 0.00 0.97 0.59 0.59 0.78 0.39 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 444 1553 695 88 396 337 434 673 688 124 727 325 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.2 21.5 0.0 61.4 49.8 0.0 47.5 33.4 33.4 61.1 49.4 51.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 36.0 0.2 0.0 10.7 40.5 0.0 34.7 1.0 1.0 15.8 0.4 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln19.5 2.7 0.0 1.1 18.0 0.0 18.8 10.9 11.1 1.7 3.2 5.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 83.3 21.7 0.0 72.2 90.3 0.0 82.1 34.4 34.4 76.9 49.8 54.7 LnGrp LOS F C E F F C C E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 681 415 1177 397
Approach Delay, s/veh 60.9 89.1 51.4 54.7
Approach LOS E F D D
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.5 50.3 7.6 60.7 35.6 23.1 36.3 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s8.9 48.3 6.3 52.5 31.1 26.1 31.8 27.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.1 23.9 3.9 7.4 31.8 14.0 32.8 28.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.1 0.0 13.2 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 60.2
HCM 2010 LOS E
934
HCM 2010 TWSC
6: Buchanan Rd. & Driveway 1 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 528 1092 14 9 8
Future Vol, veh/h 10 528 1092 14 9 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 10 528 1092 14 9 8
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1106 0 - 0 1647 1099
Stage 1 - - - - 1099 -
Stage 2 - - - - 548 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 631 - - - 109 258
Stage 1 - - - - 319 -
Stage 2 - - - - 579 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 631 - - - 107 258
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 107 -
Stage 1 - - - - 319 -
Stage 2 - - - - 566 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 32.5

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 631 - - - 148
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - - 0.115
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.8 0 - - 32.5
HCM Lane LOS B A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4
935
HCM 2010 TWSC
7: Buchanan Rd. & Driveway 2 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions A.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 527 1094 9 13 12
Future Vol, veh/h 10 527 1094 9 13 12
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 10 527 1094 9 13 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1103 0 - 0 1646 1099
Stage 1 - - - - 1099 -
Stage 2 - - - - 547 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 633 - - - 109 258
Stage 1 - - - - 319 -
Stage 2 - - - - 580 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 633 - - - 107 258
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 107 -
Stage 1 - - - - 319 -
Stage 2 - - - - 567 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 34

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 633 - - - 149
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - - 0.168
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.8 0 - - 34
HCM Lane LOS B A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.6
936
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Buchanan Rd. & Loveridge Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 151 859 363 261 433 291
Future Volume (veh/h) 151 859 363 261 433 291
Number 5 2 6 16 7 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 151 859 363 261 433 291
Adj No. of Lanes 111111
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 211 1028 656 544 496 443
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.55 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.28
Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1863 1544 1774 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 151 859 363 261 433 291
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1863 1544 1774 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 23.9 9.8 8.2 14.5 10.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 23.9 9.8 8.2 14.5 10.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 1028 656 544 496 443
V/C Ratio(X) 0.72 0.84 0.55 0.48 0.87 0.66
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 256 1250 832 689 647 577
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.4 11.6 16.2 15.7 21.4 19.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.6 4.3 0.7 0.7 9.0 1.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 13.4 5.1 3.6 8.3 8.8
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.0 15.9 16.9 16.4 30.3 20.8
LnGrp LOS C B B B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1010 624 724
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.3 16.7 26.5
Approach LOS B B C
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 39.4 22.9 12.4 26.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 41.8 22.7 9.0 27.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 25.9 16.5 7.1 11.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 8.5 0.9 0.0 8.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.4
HCM 2010 LOS C
Notes
937
HCM 2010 TWSC
2: Woodborough Place/Driveway & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1279 13 2 607 0 7 0 2 28 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1279 13 2 607 0 7 0 2 28 0 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 1279 13 2 607 0 7 0 2 28 0 10
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 607 0 0 1292 0 0 1897 1897 1287 1898 1903 609 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1286 1286 - 611 611 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 611 611 - 1287 1292 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 971 - - 537 - - 53 69 201 53 69 495
Stage 1 - - - - - - 202 235 - 481 484 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 481 484 - 202 233 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 969 - - 536 - - 52 69 201 52 69 494
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 52 69 - 52 69 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 202 235 - 481 481 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 468 481 - 200 233 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 72.7 103.8

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 62 969 - - 536 - - 52 494
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.145 - - - 0.004 - - 0.538 0.02
HCM Control Delay (s) 72.7 0 - - 11.7 0 - 136.4 12.4
HCM Lane LOS F A - - B A - F B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 - - 2.1 0.1
938
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Ventura Dr. & Buchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 7 1172 147 57 543 15 105 23 71 202 104 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 7 1172 147 57 543 15 105 23 71 202 104 18 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 7 1172 147 57 543 15 105 23 71 202 104 18 Adj No. of Lanes 111110110110
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 22 1167 989 89 1198 33 230 77 239 246 299 52 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.63 0.63 0.05 0.66 0.66 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1580 1774 1804 50 1257 400 1234 1289 1546 268 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 7 1172 147 57 0 558 105 0 94 202 0 122 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1580 1774 0 1854 1257 0 1634 1289 0 1813 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 74.5 4.6 3.8 0.0 17.2 9.4 0.0 5.9 17.1 0.0 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 74.5 4.6 3.8 0.0 17.2 16.3 0.0 5.9 23.0 0.0 6.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 22 1167 989 89 0 1231 230 0 316 246 0 351 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 1.00 0.15 0.64 0.00 0.45 0.46 0.00 0.30 0.82 0.00 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 104 1167 989 104 0 1231 230 0 316 246 0 351 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.3 22.2 9.2 55.5 0.0 9.6 48.5 0.0 41.1 51.6 0.0 41.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 27.4 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.2 18.2 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 46.8 2.0 2.0 0.0 8.7 3.3 0.0 2.7 7.9 0.0 3.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.4 49.6 9.2 61.3 0.0 9.7 49.1 0.0 41.2 69.8 0.0 41.7 LnGrp LOS E F A E A D D E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1326 615 199 324
Approach Delay, s/veh 45.2 14.5 45.4 59.2
Approach LOS D B D E
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.9 80.0 28.0 6.4 84.5 28.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 74.5 23.0 7.0 74.5 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.8 76.5 25.0 2.5 19.2 18.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 39.4
HCM 2010 LOS D
939
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Meadows Ave. & Buchanan Rd./Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 41 1346 59 74 528 35 44 0 52 41 2 45 Future Volume (veh/h) 41 1346 59 74 528 35 44 0 52 41 2 45 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 41 1346 59 74 528 35 44 0 52 41 2 45 Adj No. of Lanes 1 11110110110
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 62 1393 1183 93 1320 88 122 0 124 117 5 120
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.75 0.75 0.05 0.77 0.77 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1582 1774 1725 114 1353 0 1583 1347 68 1526 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 41 1346 59 74 0 563 44 0 52 41 0 47 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1863 1582 1774 0 1840 1353 0 1583 1347 0 1594 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.0 87.7 1.3 5.5 0.0 13.8 4.3 0.0 4.2 4.0 0.0 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.0 87.7 1.3 5.5 0.0 13.8 8.0 0.0 4.2 8.2 0.0 3.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 62 1393 1183 93 0 1408 122 0 124 117 0 125 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.97 0.05 0.80 0.00 0.40 0.36 0.00 0.42 0.35 0.00 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 116 1477 1254 93 0 1435 229 0 249 224 0 251 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 63.6 15.3 4.4 62.5 0.0 5.3 62.2 0.0 58.6 62.5 0.0 58.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.3 15.4 0.0 34.2 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.7 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.6 50.1 0.6 3.6 0.0 6.9 1.6 0.0 1.9 1.5 0.0 1.7 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 67.9 30.7 4.4 96.7 0.0 5.4 62.9 0.0 59.4 63.2 0.0 59.1 LnGrp LOS E C A F A E E E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1446 637 96 88
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.7 16.0 61.0 61.0
Approach LOS C B E E
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.1 105.8 15.6 9.8 108.1 15.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.1 6.0 5.1 5.1 6.0 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s7.0 105.8 21.0 8.7 104.1 21.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s7.5 89.7 10.2 5.0 15.8 10.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.1 0.3 0.0 19.3 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 29.0
HCM 2010 LOS C
Notes
940
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Somersville Rd. & Bunchanan Rd. 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 417 509 702 54 252 129 265 409 36 264 603 418 Future Volume (veh/h) 417 509 702 54 252 129 265 409 36 264 603 418 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 417 509 0 54 252 0 265 409 36 264 603 418 Adj No. of Lanes 1 21111120121
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 416 1403 627 69 375 318 279 780 68 279 839 369 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.40 0.00 0.04 0.20 0.00 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3292 289 1774 3539 1557 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 417 509 0 54 252 0 265 219 226 264 603 418 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1811 1774 1770 1557 Q Serve(g_s), s 26.1 11.3 0.0 3.4 13.9 0.0 16.5 12.0 12.1 16.4 17.5 26.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 26.1 11.3 0.0 3.4 13.9 0.0 16.5 12.0 12.1 16.4 17.5 26.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 416 1403 627 69 375 318 279 419 429 279 839 369 V/C Ratio(X) 1.00 0.36 0.00 0.78 0.67 0.00 0.95 0.52 0.53 0.95 0.72 1.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 416 1455 651 100 435 370 279 419 429 279 839 369 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.7 23.7 0.0 53.0 41.1 0.0 46.5 37.0 37.1 46.5 39.1 42.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 45.0 0.7 0.0 17.4 9.3 0.0 40.8 0.9 1.0 39.6 2.8 88.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln17.9 5.7 0.0 2.0 8.1 0.0 11.3 5.9 6.2 11.1 8.9 20.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 87.6 24.4 0.0 70.5 50.4 0.0 87.3 37.9 38.0 86.1 41.9 130.6 LnGrp LOS F C E D F D D F D F
Approach Vol, veh/h 926 306 710 1285
Approach Delay, s/veh 52.9 53.9 56.4 79.8
Approach LOS D D E E
Timer 1 2345678
Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s22.0 31.4 8.9 49.2 22.0 31.4 30.6 27.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s17.5 26.4 6.3 45.8 17.5 26.4 26.1 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s18.4 14.1 5.4 13.3 18.5 28.4 28.1 15.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.3 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 64.5
HCM 2010 LOS E
941
HCM 2010 TWSC
6: Buchanan Rd. & Driveway 1 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 1435 605 16 10 10
Future Vol, veh/h 10 1435 605 16 10 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 10 1435 605 16 10 10
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 621 0 - 0 2068 613
Stage 1 - - - - 613 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1455 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 960 - - - 60 492
Stage 1 - - - - 541 -
Stage 2 - - - - 214 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 960 - - - 57 492
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 57 -
Stage 1 - - - - 541 -
Stage 2 - - - - 203 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 48.7

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 960 - - - 102
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - - 0.196
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 0 - - 48.7
HCM Lane LOS A A - - E
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.7
942
HCM 2010 TWSC
7: Buchanan Rd. & Driveway 2 1/11/2017
Cumulative plus Project Conditions P.M. Peak Synchro 9 Report TJKM Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 1430 607 10 16 14
Future Vol, veh/h 15 1430 607 10 16 14
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 15 1430 607 10 16 14
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 617 0 - 0 2072 612
Stage 1 - - - - 612 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1460 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 963 - - - 59 493
Stage 1 - - - - 541 -
Stage 2 - - - - 213 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 963 - - - 55 493
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 55 -
Stage 1 - - - - 541 -
Stage 2 - - - - 197 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 60.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 963 - - - 94
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - - 0.319
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 0 - - 60.3
HCM Lane LOS A A - - F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 1.2
943
AM peak hour
PM peak hour

Minor Street Volume = 21
(38) VPH
Major Street Volume = 1956(2011) VPH
Source: CA MUTCD 2014, Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies, Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals, Figure 4C-3
Peak Hour Warrant (Urban Areas)
Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Scenario: Cumulative plus Project Conditions
A signal is not warranted for
both A.M. & P.M. Peak Hour
944
LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road
P a g e | 49
Appendix F – CCTA Methodology Traffix Software Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
945
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:04:00 2017 Page 3-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Base Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #1: Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Base Vol: 285 0 160***
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Base Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Base Vol:
287*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 95
1 194

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 399 1 Critical V/C: 0.644 1 587***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 19.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 13.9 0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Base Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Loveridge Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 0 0 8 8
Y+R: 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 7:30-8:30 A.M.

Base Vol: 0 0 0 160 0 285 287 399 0 0 587 194
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 160 0 285 287 399 0 0 587 194
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 174 0 310 327 454 0 0 607 201
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 174 0 310 327 454 0 0 607 201
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 310 0 0 0 0 0 174
RTOR Vol: 0 0 0 174 0 0 327 454 0 0 607 27
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 174 0 0 327 454 0 0 607 27
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1720 0 1720 1720 1720 0 0 1720 1720
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.02 Crit Volume: 0 174 327 607
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
946
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:04:00 2017 Page 3-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Base Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Base Vol: 3 0 4
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Base Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Base Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 511 0 Critical V/C: 0.133 0 803
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.8 1
8 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.8 0 1
LOS: D

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Base Vol: 13 0 4
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Street Name: Woodborough Place Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 7:30-8:30 A.M.

Base Vol: 13 0 4 4 0 3 0 511 8 1 803 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 13 0 4 4 0 3 0 511 8 1 803 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 15 0 5 9 0 7 0 574 9 1 824 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 15 0 5 9 0 7 0 574 9 1 824 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1408 1404 579 1407 1409 824 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 583 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 118 141 519 118 140 376 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1001 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 115 141 519 117 140 376 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1001 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 14.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B * * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 141 xxxxx 117 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.5 xxxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 34.7 xxxxx 38.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * D * E * * * * * A * *
ApproachDel: 34.7 28.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: D D * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
947
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:04:00 2017 Page 3-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 13 0 4 4 0 3 0 511 8 1 803 0
ApproachDel: 34.7 28.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=17]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1347] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=7]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1347] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 13 0 4 4 0 3 0 511 8 1 803 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1323
Minor Approach Volume: 17
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 145
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 948
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:04:00 2017 Page 3-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Base Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #3: Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Base Vol: 9 4*** 12
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Base Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Base Vol:
8*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 132
0 7***

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 436 1 Critical V/C: 0.540 0 697
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 38.7 0
82 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 15.0 1 22
LOS: A

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Base Vol: 103*** 47 38
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Ventura Drive Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 7:30-8:30 A.M.

Base Vol: 103 47 38 12 4 9 8 436 82 22 697 7
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 103 47 38 12 4 9 8 436 82 22 697 7
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 142 65 53 15 5 12 9 481 90 24 753 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 142 65 53 15 5 12 9 481 90 24 753 8
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 142 65 53 15 5 12 9 481 0 24 753 8
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 142 65 53 15 5 12 9 481 0 24 753 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.55 0.45 1.00 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1720 951 769 1720 529 1191 1720 1720 1720 1720 1703 17 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.01 0.44 0.44 Crit Volume: 142 17 9 760
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
949
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:04:00 2017 Page 3-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Base Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #4: Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Base Vol: 20 3*** 22
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Base Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Base Vol:
15*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 88
0 21

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 441 1 Critical V/C: 0.518 0 650***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 7.1 0
47 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 9.1 1 29
LOS: A

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Base Vol: 46*** 1 52
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Meadows Avenue Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Y+R: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.0 6.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 7:45-8:45 A.M.

Base Vol: 46 1 52 22 3 20 15 441 47 29 650 21
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 1 52 22 3 20 15 441 47 29 650 21
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 67 1 76 33 5 30 15 452 48 33 751 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 67 1 76 33 5 30 15 452 48 33 751 24
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 67 1 76 33 5 30 15 452 0 33 751 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 67 1 76 33 5 30 15 452 0 33 751 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.02 0.98 1.00 0.13 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 1720 32 1688 1720 224 1496 1720 1720 1720 1720 1666 54 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.26 0.00 0.02 0.45 0.45 Crit Volume: 67 35 15 775
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
950
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:04:00 2017 Page 3-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Base Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #5: Somersville Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Base Vol: 164 155*** 49
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Base Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Base Vol:
241*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 179
1 118

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 148 2 Critical V/C: 0.639 1 257***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 45.9 0
178 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 41.1 1 28
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Base Vol: 321*** 398 11
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Somersville Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Y+R: 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 7:30-8:30 A.M.

Base Vol: 321 398 11 49 155 164 241 148 178 28 257 118
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 321 398 11 49 155 164 241 148 178 28 257 118 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 403 499 14 58 182 192 257 158 190 33 303 139 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 403 499 14 58 182 192 257 158 190 33 303 139 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 192 0 0 190 0 0 58
RTOR Vol: 403 499 14 58 182 0 257 158 0 33 303 82
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 403 499 14 58 182 0 257 158 0 33 303 82
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1650 3211 89 1650 3300 1650 1650 3300 1650 1650 1650 1650 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.16 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.18 0.05 Crit Volume: 403 91 257 303
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
951
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:08:27 2017 Page 3-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Base Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #1: Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Base Vol: 307 0 235***
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Base Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Base Vol:
186 1
Cycle Time (sec): 95
1 183

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 773*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.627 1 359
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 10.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 12.9 0 0***
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Base Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Loveridge Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 0 0 8 8
Y+R: 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 5:00-6:00 P.M.

Base Vol: 0 0 0 235 0 307 186 773 0 0 359 183
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 235 0 307 186 773 0 0 359 183
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 257 0 335 198 822 0 0 400 204
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 257 0 335 198 822 0 0 400 204
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 204
RTOR Vol: 0 0 0 257 0 137 198 822 0 0 400 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 257 0 137 198 822 0 0 400 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1720 0 1720 1720 1720 0 0 1720 1720
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.08 0.12 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 257 822 0
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
952
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:08:27 2017 Page 3-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Base Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Base Vol: 8 0 23
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Base Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Base Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 994 0 Critical V/C: 0.606 0 538
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 3.6 1
11 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 3.6 0 2
LOS: F

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Base Vol: 6 0 2
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Street Name: Woodborough Place Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 5:00-6:00 P.M.

Base Vol: 6 0 2 23 0 8 0 994 11 2 538 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 6 0 2 23 0 8 0 994 11 2 538 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 12 0 4 50 0 18 0 1021 11 2 581 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 12 0 4 50 0 18 0 1021 11 2 581 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1620 1611 1026 1613 1617 581 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1032 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 84 105 287 85 105 517 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 681 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 81 105 287 83 104 517 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 681 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.15 0.00 0.01 0.61 0.00 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.3 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B * * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 98 xxxxx 83 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx 2.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 48.6 xxxxx 99.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.3 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * E * F * * * * * B * *
ApproachDel: 48.6 77.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: E F * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
953
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:08:27 2017 Page 3-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 6 0 2 23 0 8 0 994 11 2 538 0
ApproachDel: 48.6 77.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=8]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1584] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.7]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=31]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1584] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 6 0 2 23 0 8 0 994 11 2 538 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1545
Minor Approach Volume: 31
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 156
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 954
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:08:27 2017 Page 3-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Base Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #3: Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Base Vol: 24 37*** 43
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Base Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Base Vol:
12 1
Cycle Time (sec): 132
0 19

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 890*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.645 0 441
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 14.5 0
134 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 14.2 1 27***
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Base Vol: 84*** 13 40
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Ventura Drive Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 5:00-6:00 P.M.

Base Vol: 84 13 40 43 37 24 12 890 134 27 441 19
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 84 13 40 43 37 24 12 890 134 27 441 19
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 101 16 48 53 46 30 12 904 136 30 493 21
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 101 16 48 53 46 30 12 904 136 30 493 21
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 101 16 48 53 46 30 12 904 35 30 493 21
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 101 16 48 53 46 30 12 904 35 30 493 21
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.25 0.75 1.00 0.61 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.04 Final Sat.: 1720 422 1298 1720 1043 677 1720 1720 1720 1720 1649 71 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.53 0.02 0.02 0.30 0.30 Crit Volume: 101 75 904 30
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
955
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:08:27 2017 Page 3-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Base Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #4: Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Base Vol: 34 2 34***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Base Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Base Vol:
31 1
Cycle Time (sec): 88
0 29

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 901*** 1 Critical V/C: 0.640 0 404
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 8.5 0
47 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 9.0 1 61***
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Base Vol: 35 0 43***
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Meadows Avenue Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Y+R: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.0 6.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 5:00-6:00 P.M.

Base Vol: 35 0 43 34 2 34 31 901 47 61 404 29
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 35 0 43 34 2 34 31 901 47 61 404 29
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 41 0 51 51 3 51 32 935 49 66 435 31
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 41 0 51 51 3 51 32 935 49 66 435 31
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 41 0 51 51 3 51 32 935 7 66 435 31
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 41 0 51 51 3 51 32 935 7 66 435 31
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.07 Final Sat.: 1720 0 1720 1720 96 1624 1720 1720 1720 1720 1605 115 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.54 0.00 0.04 0.27 0.27 Crit Volume: 51 51 935 66
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
956
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:08:27 2017 Page 3-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Base Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #5: Somersville Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Base Vol: 263 436*** 145
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Base Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Base Vol:
311*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 179
1 86

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 318 2 Critical V/C: 0.549 1 144***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 44.5 0
424 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 39.2 1 30
LOS: A

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Base Vol: 168*** 215 12
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Somersville Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Y+R: 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 5:00-6:00 P.M.

Base Vol: 168 215 12 145 436 263 311 318 424 30 144 86
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 168 215 12 145 436 263 311 318 424 30 144 86 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 185 237 13 157 471 284 324 331 441 34 162 97 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 185 237 13 157 471 284 324 331 441 34 162 97 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 284 0 0 185 0 0 97
RTOR Vol: 185 237 13 157 471 0 324 331 256 34 162 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 185 237 13 157 471 0 324 331 256 34 162 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1650 3126 174 1650 3300 1650 1650 3300 1650 1650 1650 1650 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.00 0.20 0.10 0.16 0.02 0.10 0.00 Crit Volume: 185 236 324 162
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
957
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:09:28 2017 Page 3-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project A.M.

Intersection #1: Loveridge Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 285 0 165***
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
287*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 95
1 199

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 410 1 Critical V/C: 0.654 1 598***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 19.4 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 14.0 0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Loveridge Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 0 0 8 8
Y+R: 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 7:30-8:30 A.M.

Base Vol: 0 0 0 160 0 285 287 399 0 0 587 194
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 160 0 285 287 399 0 0 587 194
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 5
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 165 0 285 287 410 0 0 598 199
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 180 0 310 327 466 0 0 618 206
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 180 0 310 327 466 0 0 618 206
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 310 0 0 0 0 0 180
RTOR Vol: 0 0 0 180 0 0 327 466 0 0 618 26
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 180 0 0 327 466 0 0 618 26
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1720 0 1720 1720 1720 0 0 1720 1720
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.02 Crit Volume: 0 180 327 618
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
958
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:09:28 2017 Page 3-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project A.M.

Intersection #2: Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 3 0 4
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 527 0 Critical V/C: 0.140 0 819
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.8 1
8 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.8 0 1
LOS: E

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Initial Vol: 13 0 4
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Street Name: Woodborough Place Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 7:30-8:30 A.M.

Base Vol: 13 0 4 4 0 3 0 511 8 1 803 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 13 0 4 4 0 3 0 511 8 1 803 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 16 0
Initial Fut: 13 0 4 4 0 3 0 527 8 1 819 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 15 0 5 9 0 7 0 592 9 1 840 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 15 0 5 9 0 7 0 592 9 1 840 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1442 1439 597 1441 1443 840 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 601 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 111 134 507 111 133 368 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 986 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 109 134 507 110 133 368 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 986 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 15.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.7 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B * * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 134 xxxxx 110 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.5 xxxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 36.6 xxxxx 40.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.7 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * E * E * * * * * A * *
ApproachDel: 36.6 29.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: E D * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
959
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:09:28 2017 Page 3-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 13 0 4 4 0 3 0 527 8 1 819 0
ApproachDel: 36.6 29.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=17]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1379] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=7]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=1379] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Woodborough Place and Buchanan Road
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 13 0 4 4 0 3 0 527 8 1 819 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1355
Minor Approach Volume: 17
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 138
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. 960
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:09:28 2017 Page 3-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project A.M.

Intersection #3: Ventura Drive and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 9 4*** 14
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
8*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 132
0 9

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 452 1 Critical V/C: 0.551 0 713***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 12.9 0
82 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 15.1 1 24
LOS: A

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 103*** 47 40
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Ventura Drive Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 7:30-8:30 A.M.

Base Vol: 103 47 38 12 4 9 8 436 82 22 697 7
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 103 47 38 12 4 9 8 436 82 22 697 7
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 16 0 2 16 2
Initial Fut: 103 47 40 14 4 9 8 452 82 24 713 9
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 142 65 55 18 5 12 9 498 90 26 770 10
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 142 65 55 18 5 12 9 498 90 26 770 10
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 142 65 55 18 5 12 9 498 0 26 770 10
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 142 65 55 18 5 12 9 498 0 26 770 10
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.54 0.46 1.00 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1720 929 791 1720 529 1191 1720 1720 1720 1720 1699 21 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.00 0.02 0.45 0.45 Crit Volume: 142 17 9 780
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
961
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:09:28 2017 Page 3-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project A.M.

Intersection #4: Meadows Avenue and Buchanan Road
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 24 3*** 22
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
19*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 88
0 21***

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 457 1 Critical V/C: 0.537 0 667
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 17.9 0
49 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 9.3 1 29
LOS: A

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 48*** 1 52
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Meadows Avenue Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Y+R: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.0 6.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 7:45-8:45 A.M.

Base Vol: 46 1 52 22 3 20 15 441 47 29 650 21
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 1 52 22 3 20 15 441 47 29 650 21
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 16 2 0 17 0
Initial Fut: 48 1 52 22 3 24 19 457 49 29 667 21
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 70 1 76 33 5 36 19 469 50 33 770 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 70 1 76 33 5 36 19 469 50 33 770 24
RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0
RTOR Vol: 70 1 76 33 5 36 19 469 0 33 770 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 70 1 76 33 5 36 19 469 0 33 770 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.02 0.98 1.00 0.11 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 1720 32 1688 1720 191 1529 1720 1720 1720 1720 1668 52 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.02 0.46 0.46 Crit Volume: 70 41 19 794
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
962
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:09:28 2017 Page 3-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
CCTALOS (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project A.M.

Intersection #5: Somersville Road and Buchanan Road
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 173 155*** 49
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect Signal=Protect

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 11/15/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
249*** 1
Cycle Time (sec): 179
1 118

0 Loss Time (sec): 0
0 152 2 Critical V/C: 0.650 1 261***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 46.2 0
182 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 41.3 1 28
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Initial Vol: 325*** 398 11
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Somersville Road Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Y+R: 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 15 Nov 2016 << 7:30-8:30 A.M.

Base Vol: 321 398 11 49 155 164 241 148 178 28 257 118
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 321 398 11 49 155 164 241 148 178 28 257 118 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 4 0 0 0 0 9 8 4 4 0 4 0
Initial Fut: 325 398 11 49 155 173 249 152 182 28 261 118 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 408 499 14 58 182 203 265 162 194 33 308 139 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 408 499 14 58 182 203 265 162 194 33 308 139 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 194 0 0 58
RTOR Vol: 408 499 14 58 182 0 265 162 0 33 308 82
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 408 499 14 58 182 0 265 162 0 33 308 82
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1650 3211 89 1650 3300 1650 1650 3300 1650 1650 1650 1650 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.16 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.19 0.05 Crit Volume: 408 91 265 308
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
963
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:09:28 2017 Page 3-7
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA LMK Petro at 1625 Buchanan Road,City of Pittsburg,CA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing plus Project A.M.

Intersection #6: Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 1
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Initial Vol: 8 0 9
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol Signal=Uncontrol

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:
10 0
Cycle Time (sec): 100
0 14

1 Loss Time (sec): 0
1 494 0 Critical V/C: 0.047 0 724
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.3 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.3 0 0
LOS: C

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Street Name: Project Driveway 1 Buchanan Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 494 0 0 724 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 494 0 0 724 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Tri: 0 0 0 9 0 8 10 0 0 0 0 14
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 9 0 8 10 494 0 0 724 14
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 9 0 8 10 494 0 0 724 14
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 9 0 8 10 494 0 0 724 14
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1245 1245 731 738 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 194 176 425 877 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 192 173 425 877 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 259 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 19.9 xxxxx 9.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * C * A * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 19.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * C * *
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Buchanan Road and Project Driveway 1
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
964
COMPARE Wed Jan 11 13:09:28 2017 Page 3-8
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Initial Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 8 10 494 0 0 724 14
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 19.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

← All documents from this meeting