CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, July 21, 2026
7:00 PM
City Council Chamber
200 Old Bernal Avenue
Pleasanton, CA 94566
The meeting will be held in-person, broadcast live on Channel 29 and streamed live for viewing at the following links TV30 https://www.tri-valleytv.org, the City's website in the Meetings portal (a red dot will indicate a live meeting) https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/, and the City's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheCityofPleasanton.
To submit written public comment regarding an open session item on this meeting agenda visit https://onlineforms.cityofpleasantonca.gov/260426338382054. Written comments will be accepted by the City Clerk’s Office until 12:00 p.m. on the day of the Council meeting and distributed to the City Council. After 12:00 p.m., comments must be provided at the meeting.
Public participation
Speak In Person: It is requested that members of the public wishing to address the City Council submit a speaker card to the City Clerk at the meeting. When public comment is opened on an agenda item, individuals may speak once per agenda item. When your name is called, please provide comment at the podium.
Speak Remotely:
• Join the meeting using this URL: https://cityofpleasanton.zoom.us/j/85145185146 • Join by phone: +1 669 444 9171
• Webinar ID: 851 4518 5146
Use the "raise hand" function once public comment is opened on an item. You will be unmuted when your name is called and you will be re-muted after the allotted time. To raise your hand, click the "raise your hand" button or *9 on your telephone. To unmute your phone, press *6.
CALL TO ORDER
• Welcome and Pledge of Allegiance - Cm. Testa
• Roll Call
Resolution No. 2026-058
Ordinance No. 2308
AGENDA AMENDMENTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
Items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine in nature and may be enacted by one motion. If discussion is required, that particular item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered separately.
City Council
City Council Agenda Page 2 of 4 July 21, 2026
1. Approve the First Amendment to Employment Contract for Interim City Manager Services with Joseph Calabrigo
City Manager
2. Approve designation of voting delegates for the 2026 California Cities Annual Conference
3. Adopt a resolution accepting the agreement for participation in the Alameda County Operational Area Emergency Management Organization
4. Approve meeting minutes of June 2, 2026 and June 16, 2026 Community and Economic Development
5. Adopt resolutions of local support and authorize staff to submit applications to the Alameda County Transportation Commission for a total of $14,637,500 in funding from the 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan for the following four projects: 1) the West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction Project - Construction Phase 2 (CIP No. 11514) ($7,050,000); 2) the I-680/Sunol Boulevard Interchange Modernization Project - Construction Phase 1 (CIP No. 15551) ($2,000,000); 3) the I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project - Construction Phase (CIP No. 22570) ($4,462,500); and 4) the City of Pleasanton Transportation Technology Upgrade Project ($1,125,000)
Finance
6. Accept the monthly disbursements and investment report for May 2026 Public Works
7. Adopt a resolution authorizing the Director of Public Works, or designee, to apply for and execute documents related to California State Water Resources Control Board funding and financial opportunities for the Groundwater Supply Project
8. Approve plans and special provisions, authorize the City Manager to enter into a construction contract with Westside Landscape and Concrete, Inc. in the amount of $429,845 with a 10 percent contingency of $43,000 for the Nonfunctional Turf Conversion for AB 1572 Project, CIP No. 26787, and approve a budget amendment to the Parks CIP General Fund
9. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with West Yost for the development of Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Standards in an amount not to exceed $349,693
10. Accept public improvements performed by DPI, Inc., for the Annual Storm Drain Repair/Replacement (Puri Court) Project, CIP 24415 and 25415, and approve a budget amendment to the Storm Drain Replacement Fund
City Council Agenda Page 3 of 4 July 21, 2026
11. Accept the final Sewer Rate Study report and authorize Proposition 218 noticing for sewer rate changes
12. Approve the purchase of seven Ford Police Interceptor Utility Hybrids from National Auto Fleet Group for $502,381.18, inclusive of a 15 percent contingency, in the Police Vehicle Internal Service Fund (Fund 511)
MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
13. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing the Pleasanton Community of Character
14. Public Comment regarding items not listed on the agenda – Speakers are limited to 3 minutes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS
If necessary to ensure completion of the following items, the Mayor may alter time limits.
15. Public Hearing: Tabulate Proposition 218 assessment ballots, adopt resolutions approving the Engineer's Reports, confirming the diagrams and assessments, and ordering the levy of assessments for the Ponderosa-Del Prado Landscape Maintenance District 2026-1 and Bonde Ranch Landscape Maintenance District 2026-2 for FY 2026/27
16. Take the following actions associated with the approval of the Arroyo Lago Residential Project: 1) Adopt a resolution to adopt an Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH2023050339) in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164; 2) Introduce an ordinance to a) initiate the proceedings for Annexation (P25-0115) of totaling approximately 30 acres from unincorporated Alameda County to the City of Pleasanton; and to approve (b) General Plan Amendments (P25-0116) to designate land uses Medium Density Residential; (c) Pre/Rezoning (P25-0118) of said parcels in Alameda County to PUD–MDR (Planned Unit Development - Medium Density Residential) District; (d) a Planned Unit Development and rezoning (PUD-154) to construct 189 detached single-family residences with 48 deed-restricted Junior Accessory Dwelling Units, and install related on- and off-site improvements and infrastructure; and (e) a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8423 to subdivide said parcels totaling approximately 30 acres into single-family lots, private open space and private access easements; and 3) Introduce an Ordinance approving a Pre-Annexation and Development Agreement for the Project
17. Public Hearing: Adopt resolutions approving the fiscal year 2026/27 annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts 1984-1 (Ponderosa-Del Prado), 1993-1 (Windsor), 1993-2 (Bonde Ranch), 1994-1 (Oak Tree Farm), and 1995-1 (Moller Ranch)
City Council Agenda Page 4 of 4 July 21, 2026
MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL
COUNCIL REPORTS
Brief reports on conferences, seminars, and meetings attended by the Council
CITY MANAGER UPDATES
ADJOURNMENT
Notice
Under Government Code §54957.5, any writings/documents regarding an open session item on this agenda and items received by the City Clerk’s Office by 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting provided to a majority of the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet will be available for public inspection on the City’s website https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/ and also at the Pleasanton Library located at 400 Old Bernal Ave., Pleasanton, CA 94566.
There is a 90-day limit for the filing of a challenge in the Superior Court to certain City administrative decisions and orders, which require a hearing by law, the receipt of evidence, and the exercise of discretion. The 90-day limit begins on the date the decision is final (Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.6). Further, if you challenge an action taken by the City Council in court, you may be limited, by California law, including but not limited to Government Code §65009, to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council prior to or at the public hearing. The City Council may be requested to reconsider a decision if the request is made prior to the next City Council meeting, regardless of whether it is a regular or special meeting.
Accessible Public Meetings
The City of Pleasanton provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities to participate in public meetings. To make a request for a disability-related modification or accommodation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 123 Main Street, Pleasanton, CA 94566 or (925) 931-5027 at least two business days prior to the meeting date.
ATTACHMENT 1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT INTERIM CITY MANAGER
This First Amendment to Employment Contract Interim City Manager is Agreement ("First Amendment") is made on July 21, 2026, between the City of Pleasanton ("City") and Joseph Calabrigo ("Calabrigo”).
A. On June 2, 2026, the City entered into an Employment Contract for Interim City Manager services with Joseph Calabrigo (“Employment Contract”).
B. The City wishes to clarify the Employment Contract by specifying how the City will comply with Federal legal requirements regarding Social Security participation or replacement.
Now, therefore, in exchange for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Section 3 of the Employment Contract is amended to read as follows:
3. Compensation. The salary for the position of Interim City Manager shall be $25,000 a month to be paid every two weeks on the same schedule as pay is provided to regular full-time employees. Calabrigo shall receive the same CalPERS retirement benefits as management and confidential employees as set forth in the Management/ Confidential Employee Performance Compensation Plan. Calabrigo shall receive no other employment benefits (including, but not limited to, vacation leave, sick leave (except as required by law), floating holiday pay, administrative leave, health, dental, or any other benefits given to regular, full-time employees) except that City shall provide workers’ compensation benefits as required by State law, and shall pay the employer’s share of the Medicare tax.
2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
In witness whereof, authorized representatives of the parties have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement as of the date first above written.
CITY OF PLEASANTON
_________________________ ____________________________
Jack Balch, Mayor Joseph Calabrigo
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
Item #2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
July 21, 2026
City Clerk
TITLE: APPROVE DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES FOR THE 2026
CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE
SUMMARY
The League of California Cities (Cal Cities) is hosting the Annual Conference of the General Assembly on September 23-25, 2026. At this meeting, membership considers and acts on resolutions that establish policy. To cast a vote during the General Assembly, the City Council must designate a voting delegate and alternate in advance of the conference.
RECOMMENDATION
Designate Councilmember Craig Eicher as the City’s voting delegate and Councilmember Jeff Nibert as the alternate for the 2026 Cal Cities conference.
BACKGROUND
The League of California Cities (Cal Cities) engages in advocacy efforts to support local control in the state legislature and other forums, and through strategic outreach to the public, policymakers, and opinion leaders. Every year, Cal Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy.
DISCUSSION
The General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. To cast a vote during the General Assembly, the City Council must designate a voting delegate and alternate in advance of the conference.
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Not applicable, as this item is an administrative matter of City business
OUTREACH
Not applicable, as this item is an administrative matter of City business.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Not applicable, as this item is an administrative matter of City business.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk Alexa Jeffress, Assistant City Manager Joe Calabrigo, Interim City Manager
Attachments:
None
Item #3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
July 21, 2026
City Manager
TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION
IN THE ALAMEDA COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
SUMMARY
On January 27, 2026, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors approved an agreement in recognition of and participation in an Operational Area Emergency Management Organization.
An Operational Area is defined in the California Emergency Services Act (California Government Code § 8550) as an intermediate level of organization, cooperation, and planning between public entities within a county’s boundaries. The agreement establishes a unified framework for disaster preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation through December 31, 2035.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution accepting the agreement for participation in the Alameda County Operational Area Emergency Management Organization.
BACKGROUND
On May 10, 2016, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors approved an agreement that allowed the County of Alameda and other local public entities to work together by sharing resources and information to protect the public. The Operational Area agreement is renewed on a 10-year cycle. The County adopted the current agreement on January 27, 2026, and has requested that each participating jurisdiction adopt it by resolution.
The protection of life, property, and the environment is a shared responsibility of local, state, and federal governments. To support this responsibility, Alameda County, in collaboration with the cities, special districts, and nonprofit corporations within its boundaries, has elected to enter into this agreement to promote a unified and coordinated approach among state and local agencies, facilitate mutual aid, and ensure the efficient and effective use of regional and local resources during a catastrophic event.
The City's participation in the Operational Area is a routine, recurring commitment rather than a new undertaking. Approval of this agreement continues that established practice and does not change the City's existing obligations under the Operational Area structure.
DISCUSSION
The agreement integrates and coordinates the County’s available resources into an efficient and effective organizational structure by defining roles, policies, and procedures in accordance with California’s Standardized Emergency Management System. This approach ensures the most effective and cost-efficient allocation of resources. This provides a framework for collaboration in essential areas including communications, equipment, medical services,
financial matters, and environmental and economic resources.
Staff also note the timing of this approval, which comes during the current fire season. Wildfire activity typically increases regional demand for mutual aid, shared resources, and coordinated emergency communications among Alameda County's cities, special districts, and other agencies. Approving this agreement now, without a lapse in the City's Operational Area participation, helps ensure the City can continue to draw on and contribute to countywide mutual aid resources should a wildfire or other disaster affect the region during this period.
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Not applicable, as this item is a routine matter of City business.
OUTREACH
No outreach was conducted, as this item is a routine matter of City business.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Approval of this action advances the ONE Pleasanton strategic goal of Safeguarding Our City:
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Strategy D.1. Assess the City's overall emergency preparedness capabilities, resources, and tools and implement changes as needed to ensure the City is properly positioned to respond to disasters.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact from adopting this agreement except for reimbursement of direct costs under mutual aid agreements.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Leonard Lopez, Emergency
Services Manager
Alexa Jeffress, Assistant City Manager Joe Calabrigo, Interim City Manager
Attachments:
1. Attachment 1 - Resolution - Alameda County Operational Area Agreement
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON TO
ACCEPT THE AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE ALAMEDA COUNTY
OPERATIONAL AREA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
WHEREAS, the potential for a major catastrophe due to natural or manmade disaster requires all government entities within Alameda County to be prepared to share resources and information among themselves as well as with the State of California to protect public welfare; and
WHEREAS, greater efficiency and disaster preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation can be achieved by joining the efforts of the County of Alameda, the Cities, Special Districts, and other public benefit non-profit corporations together in pre-disaster agreements; and WHEREAS, the California Emergency Services Act makes reference to the “operational area” and defines it as “an intermediate level of the state emergency services organization” created to perform extraordinary functions for local governments within a county area such as strengthening mutual coordination, providing a focal point and conduit for disaster information, and assisting in the efficient management of resources
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Agreement for Participation in the Alameda County Operational Area Emergency Management Organization, attached as Exhibit A, and authorizes the City’s participation in the Alameda County Operational Area Emergency Management Organization.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the Agreement, and any related documents, on behalf of the City.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on July 21, 2026.
I, Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of July 2026, by the following vote:
Resolution No.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
Resolution No.
EXHIBIT A
Agreement for Participation in the Alameda County Operational Area Emergency Management Organization
10. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
Each of the parties agree to indemnify and hold the other parties harmless and waives all claims for compensation for any loss, damage, personal injury, or death incurred in consequences of the acts or omissions of the indemnifying parties' own employees and agents in the performance of this Agreement.
It is the intent of the parties that, where negligence is determined to have been contributory, principles of comparative fault will be followed, and each party shall bear the proportionate costs of any loss, damage, expense, and liability attributable to the party's negligence.
11. SALARIES, EMPLOYMENT AND WORKERS COMPENSATION BENEFITS The salaries, employment and workers compensation benefits of each employee participating in the Operational Area Emergency Management Organization shall be the responsibility of the party employing the individual. It is understood that each party's employees have no rights, benefits, or special employment status conferred by reason of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,
a political subdivision of the
::•re;r;;,ro.�
DAVID HAUBERT, President
Board of Supervisors
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the President of the Board of Supervisors was duly authorized to e ecut this document on behalf of the County of Alameda by a majority vote of the .
Board on / 1 '.) ; and that a copy has been delivered to the President as provided by Gover ment Code section 25103.
ATTEST: BRITNEY DAVIS
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Alameda Count , California
By�J�-'-ir--'-..........,'4-'-f----'---!�
Cler
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:
DONNA ZIEGLER
County Counsel
By rc;�(M��
Clay Christianson
Deputy County Counsel
Alameda County Operational Area Agreement Page 5
City Council Minutes Page 1 of 7 June 2, 2026
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Tuesday, June 2, 2026
7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Balch called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at the hour of 7:00 p.m. from the Council Chamber located at 200 Old Bernal Avenue.
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch
Absent: None.
AGENDA AMENDMENTS
Vice Mayor Gaidos pulled item 4 from the consent calendar for discussion.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Balch stated the consent calendar item 1.a. is to approve an employment contract for Interim City Manager Joe Calabrigo.
Mayor Balch opened public comment. There being no speakers, Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
MOTION: It was m/s by Councilmembers Nibert/Testa to approve the consent calendar as recommended with the exception of item 4 which was removed from the consent calendar. Motion passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch Noes: None
Absent: None
City Council and City Manager
1. a. Approve Employment Contract for Interim City Manager with Joseph Calabrigo Recommendation: Approve Employment Contract for Interim City Manager with Joseph Calabrigo which provides for a monthly salary of $25,000.
Item #4
City Council Minutes Page 2 of 7 June 2, 2026
b. Approve meeting minutes of May 5, 2026
Recommendation: Approve meeting minutes of May 5, 2026.
2. Adopt a resolution calling a General Municipal Election to be held Tuesday, November 3, 2026; a resolution requesting consolidation with the Statewide General Election; and a resolution pertaining to the submission of candidate statements
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-040 calling a General Municipal Election to be held Tuesday, November 3, 2026; Resolution No. 2026-041 requesting consolidation with the Statewide General Election; and Resolution No. 2026-042 pertaining to the submission of candidate statements.
Community and Economic Development
3. A) Adopt Ordinance No. 2306 approving: (1) Annexations (P18-0078) of parcels totaling 130.98 acres from unincorporated Alameda County to the City of Pleasanton; (2) General Plan Amendments (P18-0079) redesignating residential areas from Open Space–Public Health and Safety to Low Density Residential and open space areas from Low Density Residential to either Open Space–Public Health and Safety or Open Space–Parks and Recreation; (3) Rezoning (P18-0081) parcels from Pre-Zoned PUD–OS-A&G/OS-PH&S/LDR/HOZ (Planned Unit Development–Open Space–Agriculture and Grazing/Open Space–Public Health and Safety/Low Density Residential/Housing Opportunity Zone) Districts to PUD– OS-A&G/OS-PH&S/LDR (Planned Unit Development–Open Space–Agriculture and Grazing/Open Space–Public Health and Safety/Low Density Residential) Districts; (4) A Planned Unit Development (PUD-130) to construct 28 detached single-family residences, demolish and reconstruct two existing single-family residences, and install related on- and off-site improvements and infrastructure; and (5) A Vesting Tentative Tract Map (Tract 8569) to subdivide parcels totaling 128.5 acres into either single-family lots or private and public open space; and B) Adopt Ordinance No. 2307 approving a Pre-Annexation and Development Agreement
Recommendation: A) Adopt Ordinance No. 2306 approving: (1) Annexations (P18- 0078) of parcels totaling 130.98 acres from unincorporated Alameda County to the City of Pleasanton; (2) General Plan Amendments (P18-0079) redesignating residential areas from Open Space–Public Health and Safety to Low Density Residential and open space areas from Low Density Residential to either Open Space–Public Health and Safety or Open Space–Parks and Recreation; (3) Rezoning (P18-0081) parcels from Pre-Zoned PUD–OS-A&G/OS-PH&S/LDR/HOZ
City Council Minutes Page 3 of 7 June 2, 2026
(Planned Unit Development–Open Space–Agriculture and Grazing/Open Space– Public Health and Safety/Low Density Residential/Housing Opportunity Zone) Districts to PUD–OS-A&G/OS-PH&S/LDR (Planned Unit Development–Open Space–Agriculture and Grazing/Open Space–Public Health and Safety/Low Density Residential) Districts; (4) A Planned Unit Development (PUD-130) to construct 28 detached single-family residences, demolish and reconstruct two existing single-family residences, and install related on- and off-site improvements and infrastructure; and (5) A Vesting Tentative Tract Map (Tract 8569) to subdivide parcels totaling 128.5 acres into either single-family lots or private and public open space; and
B) Adopt Ordinance No. 2307 approving a Pre-Annexation and Development Agreement.
Library and Recreation
Item 4 was pulled for additional discussion.
Public Works
5. Adopt resolutions preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Reports for Landscape Maintenance Districts 1984-1 (Ponderosa-Del Prado), 1993-1 (Windsor), 1993-2 (Bonde Ranch), 1994-1 (Oak Tree Farm), and 1995-1 (Moller Ranch), declaring the City’s intention to assess the properties for the cost to operate and maintain the districts; and setting July 21, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. as the date and time for the public hearing
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution Nos. 2026-043, 2026-044, 2026-045, 2026- 046 and 2026-047:
1. Preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Reports for Landscape Maintenance Districts 1984-1 (Ponderosa-Del Prado), 1993-1 (Windsor), 1993-2 (Bonde Ranch), 1994-1 (Oak Tree Farm), and 1995-1 (Moller Ranch);
2. Declaring the City’s intention to assess properties for the cost of operating and maintaining the districts; and
3. Setting July 21, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. as the date and time for the public hearing and authorizing the City Clerk to publish a notice of annual hearing in accordance with California Streets and Highways Code section 22626(a).
6. Accept public improvements performed by Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc., for the Hopyard Road at Owens Drive Intersection Improvements Project, CIP No.15525 and approve budget amendments
Recommendation:
1. Accept the Hopyard Road at Owens Drive intersection improvements project
City Council Minutes Page 4 of 7 June 2, 2026
as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion pursuant to California Civil Code section 9204;
2. Authorize the release of the retention in the amount of approximately $210,342 to Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc., 30 calendar days after recordation of the Notice of Completion;
3. Approve a budget amendment to return $950,348 of remaining project funding to the fund balance in the Street CIP General Fund (Fund 211) for future eligible projects; and
4. Approve a budget amendment to return $152,354 of the remaining project funding to the fund balance in Transportation Development Fees (Fund 212) for future eligible projects.
7. Accept public improvements performed by Integra Construction Services, Inc. for the Lions Wayside and Delucchi Park Renovations, CIP No. 06716, and approve a budget amendment in the Park Development Impact Fee Fund Recommendation:
1. Accept public improvements performed by Integra Construction Services, Inc. for the Lions Wayside and Delucchi Parks Renovations project, CIP No. 06716, as complete.
2. Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
3. Approve a budget amendment to reduce the project's remaining budget, $36,834, to $0 in the Park Development Impact Fee Fund (Fund 222).
8. Authorize the City Manager to enter into Professional Services Agreements with Bennett Engineering Services, CSG Consultants, Inc., Sanbell-Bay Area, and Wilsey Ham for On-Call Civil Engineering Services, each in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for a three-year term, with options for two one-year extensions Recommendation:
1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into Professional Services Agreements with Bennett Engineering Services, CSG Consultants, Inc., Sanbell-Bay Area, and Wilsey Ham for on-call civil engineering services, each in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for a three-year term, with options for two one-year extensions.
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the attached Professional Services Agreements.
3. Authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to approve individual task authorizations up to $100,000, and authorize the City Manager to approve individual task authorizations up to $200,000. Task authorizations exceeding $200,000 shall be presented to the City Council for consideration.
MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
City Council Minutes Page 5 of 7 June 2, 2026
9. Presentation of a proclamation declaring June 2026 as Pride Month Presentation by Cm. Eicher to recipient PFLAG Tri-Valley.
10. Public Comment regarding items not listed on the agenda – Speakers are limited to 3 minutes.
Mayor Balch opened public comment. The following individuals provided comment:
Valerie Arkin and Kelly Cousins.
Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS
11. Approve the proposed Sewer Rate Structure, Sewer Rate, and updated Sewer Connection Fees to support implementation of the Sewer Rate Study's Financial Plan Scenario 1 - Maintain
Recommendation: Approve the proposed sewer rate structure, sewer rates, and updated sewer connection fees needed to implement the Rate Study Financial Plan’s Scenario 1 – Maintain, including:
1. Update the sewer rates for condominium and multifamily homes to be the same, consistent with DSRSD methodology;
2. Revise the sewer rate methodology for commercial and industrial customers to align with DSRSD by providing one collection rate regardless of business classification; and
3. Continue differentiating between non-submetered and submetered Pleasanton Unified School District customers.
Presentation by Siew-Chin Yeong, Director of Public Works and Nancy Phan (WRE).
Mayor Balch opened public comment. There being no speakers, Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
MOTION: It was m/s by Councilmembers Gaidos/Nibert to approve the item as recommended. Motion passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch Noes: None
Absent: None
12. Provide direction on a draft resolution and draft ordinance for a potential local transient
City Council Minutes Page 6 of 7 June 2, 2026
occupancy tax ballot measure for the November 3, 2026, general municipal election Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council provide direction on a draft resolution and draft ordinance for a potential local transient occupancy tax ballot measure for the November 3, 2026, general municipal election.
Presentation by Aaron Zavala, Assistant to the City Manager.
Mayor Balch opened public comment. The following individuals provided comment:
Kelly Cousins, Valerie Arkin.
Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
MOTION: It was m/s by Councilmembers Nibert/Testa to proceed with placement of a local transient occupancy tax ballot measure on the November 3, 2026 election. Motion passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch Noes: None
Absent: None
MOTION: It was m/s by Nibert/Testa to approve a single rate implementation at 12% beginning in 2027. Mayor Balch requested an amendment to implement the rate in a phased approach beginning at 10% in 2027 and 12% in 2028.
AMENDED MOTION: It was m/s by Nibert/Balch to approve the rate with the phased implementation beginning at 10% in 2027 and 12% in 2028. Motion passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Mayor Balch Noes: Councilmember Testa
Absent: None
Mayor Balch called a recess at 9:09 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:19 p.m.
13. Adopt a resolution approving the City of Pleasanton 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-048 approving the City of Pleasanton 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan.
Presentation by Siew-Chin Young, Public Works Director, and Colin Dixon (EKI Consulting).
Mayor Balch opened public comment. The following individuals provided comment:
Jamie Yee.
City Council Minutes Page 7 of 7 June 2, 2026
Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
4. Approve annual street closures for 2026
Recommendation: Approve annual street closures for 2026.
Vice Mayor Gaidos made a motion to add the closure of Second Street (north to south) on Halloween 2026 to the list.
Mayor Balch opened public comment. The following individuals provided comment:
Jamie Yee.
Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
MOTION: It was m/s by Councilmembers Gaidos/Nibert to approve the street closures list as presented. Motion passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch Noes: None
Absent: None
MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL
Vice Mayor Gaidos requested a cost analysis for a Second Street closure on Halloween for consideration at a future City Council agenda item. The matter was approved by majority consensus.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmembers reported on regional and local meetings attended.
CITY MANAGER UPDATES
City Manager Beaudin provided remarks.
The City Council provided remarks.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Balch adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m.
______________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
City Council Minutes Page 1 of 7 June 16, 2026
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Balch called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at the hour of 7:00 p.m. from the Council Chamber located at 200 Old Bernal Avenue.
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch
Absent: Councilmember Eicher
AGENDA AMENDMENTS
City Manager Calabrigo recommended that the City Council remove item 15 from the consent calendar for discussion and any questions for the consultant, and subsequently consider continuation of the item to the July 7 City Council meeting. Mayor Balch removed item 15 from the consent calendar for discussion as recommended by the City Manager.
Vice Mayor Gaidos requested to continue item 20 to the July 7 City Council meeting to request additional images of the gas station signage.
Councilmember Testa requested to remove item 5 from the consent calendar for further discussion. Cm. Testa requested to continue item 2 to the July 7 City Council meeting due to Councilmember Eicher being absent from the meeting and serves as the other member on the ad-hoc subcommittee.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Balch opened public comment. There being no speakers, public comment was closed. M
MOTION: It was m/s by Councilmember Nibert/Councilmember Gaidos to approve the consent calendar with the exception of items 2, 5, and 15. Motion passed by the following vote:
Noes:
Absent:
Councilmembers Nibert, Gaidos, Testa, Mayor Balch
None
Councilmember Eicher
Ayes:
City Council Minutes Page 2 of 7 June 16, 2026
1. Approve meeting minutes of May 19, 2026
Recommendation: Approve meeting minutes of May 19, 2026.
2. Introduce an ordinance updating the Pleasanton Municipal Code Title 2 to modify the duties, frequency of meetings, and maintenance of membership for the Civic Arts, Human Services, Library, and Parks and Recreation Commissions, and modify the membership and meeting frequency for the Youth Commission Item continued.
3. Adopt a resolution amending the local Conflict of Interest Code and updating the list of designated positions required to file Statements of Economic Interests Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-049 amending the local Conflict of Interest Code and updating the list of designated positions required to file Statements of Economic Interests.
Community and Economic Development
4. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute second amendments to extend the term of the agreements with Hexagon, TJKM, and Fehr and Peers for on-call transportation consultant services, and approve an increase of $200,000 to the aggregate contract authorization, to a new total aggregate of $700,000 through June 30, 2027
Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendments to the professional services agreements with Hexagon, TJKM, and Fehr and Peers for on-call transportation consultant services, to extend the term of the agreements until June 30, 2027, and increase the aggregate not-to-exceed total across all three contracts by $200,000, to a new total aggregate not-to-exceed amount of $700,000.
Finance
6. Accept the monthly disbursements and investment report for April 2026 Recommendation: Accept claim disbursements in the amount of $18,502,999 and the investment report for the month of April 2026.
7. Adopt a resolution approving Fiscal Year 2026/27 Investment Policy and Guidelines
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-050 approving the Investment Policy and Guidelines for FY 2026/27.
City Manager
City Council Minutes Page 3 of 7 June 16, 2026
8. Adopt a resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Appropriations Limit Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-051 approving the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Appropriations Limit.
9. Approve Fiscal Year 2026/27 recurring purchase order agreements Recommendation: Authorize the issuance of recurring purchase order agreements to vendors for FY 2026/27.
Human Resources
10. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Innovative Claim Solutions, Inc., to provide third-party administration of the City's workers' compensation program, for a three-year term through June 30, 2029, with the option to renew for two successive one-year terms, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $1,399,579 over five years
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Innovative Claim Solutions, Inc., to provide third-party administration of the City's workers' compensation program, for a three-year term through June 30, 2029, with the option to renew for two successive one-year terms, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $1,399,579 over five years. Renewals will be mutually agreed upon by both parties.
Library and Recreation
11. Authorize the City Manager to enter into the second amendment to the joint use agreement with Pleasanton Unified School District for the middle school gymnasiums
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into the second amendment to the joint use agreement with Pleasanton Unified School District for the middle school gymnasiums.
Public Works
12. Adopt a resolution approving rates for solid waste, recyclable materials, and organic materials collection for fiscal year 2026/27 as required by the Franchise Agreement between the City and Pleasanton Garbage Service, Inc.
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-052 approving rates for solid waste, recyclable materials, and organic materials collection for FY 2026/27, as required by the Franchise Agreement between the City and PGS, and approve the FY 2026/27 garbage rate adjustment of 2.23 percent.
City Council Minutes Page 4 of 7 June 16, 2026
13. Approve plans and special provisions, and authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Villalobos and Associates in the amount of $127,490 for the 2026 Miscellaneous Sidewalk and Pathway Replacement Project, CIP No. 26511, and approve a budget amendment to fund the project
Recommendation:
1. Approve plans and special provisions for the 2026 Miscellaneous Sidewalk and Pathway Replacement Project, CIP No. 26511;
2. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a construction contract with Villalobos and Associates for the low bid amount of $127,490;
3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to approve and execute contract change orders from a project contingency not-to-exceed $25,500, approximately 20 percent of the contract; and
4. Approve a budget amendment transferring $168,133 from the Deferred Maintenance – Asset Management Plan, CIP No. 26489 (Fund 201), to the 2026 Miscellaneous Sidewalk and Pathway Replacement Project, CIP No. 26511.
14. Approve plans and special provisions, and authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Frontline General Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $284,951 for the Sassafras Court Storm Drain Interceptor Project, CIP No. 22484; and authorize the Director of Public Works to approve and execute contract change orders from a project contingency not to exceed $44,843 Recommendation:
1. Approve plans and special provisions for the Sassafras Court Storm Drain Interceptor Project, CIP No. 22484;
2. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a construction contract with Frontline Engineering, Inc., for the low bid amount of $284,951; and
3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to approve and execute contract change orders from a project contingency not-to-exceed $44,843 or approximately 15 percent of the contract amount.
MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
16. Presentation of a proclamation recognizing Juneteenth 2026 Vice Mayor Gaidos presented the proclamation to recipient Cheza Nami Foundation.
17. Presentation of a proclamation recognizing the 250th Anniversary of the United States
City Council Minutes Page 5 of 7 June 16, 2026
Vice Mayor Gaidos presented the proclamation to recipient American Legion Post 237.
18. Public Comment regarding items not listed on the agenda – Speakers are limited to 3 minutes.
Mayor Balch opened public comment. The following individuals provided comment:
Anne Matarrese Everton, Jan Coleman Knight, Laurie Herbert, Tony Shuga, Jan Kuchinsky, Vicki LaBarge, Kelly Cousins, Anika Nicolas, Aurora Nicolas, Austin Nicolas, and Linda Kelly.
Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS
19. Adopt a resolution approving a policy establishing a process for public meeting disruptions under Senate Bill 707
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-053 approving a policy establishing a process for public meeting disruptions under Senate Bill 707.
Presentation by Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk.
Mayor Balch opened public comment. There being no speakers, Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
MOTION: It was m/s by None/None to approve the item as recommended. Motion passed by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Councilmembers Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch
None
Councilmember Eicher
20. Review an application for Sign Design Review to rebrand an existing 76 Gas Station and Circle K Market to Shell Gasoline and FastFill Market located at 4191 First Street, filed as Case No. P25-0300
Item continued.
15. Authorize the City Manager to enter into agreements with Core & Main LP for the water meter Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Capital Expenditure Project in an amount not to exceed $10,262,257 and the AMI Operation Expenditure Services in an amount not to exceed $2,514,096, and authorize a five percent aggregate contingency for the Water Meter and Advanced Metering Infrastructure Replacement Project, CIP No. 26137
City Council Minutes Page 6 of 7 June 16, 2026
Recommendation:
1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into an AMI CPX Agreement for Goods and Services with Core & Main LP for the Water Meter and AMI Replacement Project in an amount not to exceed $10,262,257;
2. Authorize the City Manager to enter into an AMI OPX Agreement for Goods and Services with Core & Main LP, for the software services, network services, and future water meters purchases in an amount not to exceed $2,514,096; and
3. Authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to approve and execute change orders for the awarded agreements, subject to a total aggregate contingency amount not to exceed $513,113, which is equal to five percent of the total awarded contract amount.
Presentation by Siew-Chin Yeong, Public Works Director.
Mayor Balch opened public comment. The following individuals provided comment:
Valerie Pryor.
Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
MOTION: It was m/s by Nibert/Gaidos to continue the item to the July 7, 2026 City Council meeting. Motion passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch Noes: None
Absent: Councilmember Eicher
5. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Design Professional Services Agreement with Kier and Wright Civil Engineers and Surveyors, Inc., in the amount of $925,411 for the development, evaluation, and creation of a precise roadway alignment for El Charro Road (CIP 27501), and approve the related budget amendments
Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Design Professional Services Agreement with Kier and Wright Civil Engineers and Surveyors, Inc., in the amount of $927,618, and approve budget amendments to transfer $925,411 from the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee Reserve, CIP No. 01541, to the El Charro Road Precise Roadway Alignment Project, CIP No. 27501 (21430124-440108-27501) in the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fund (Fund 214).
Presentation by Mike Tassano, Traffic Engineer.
Mayor Balch opened public comment. There being no speakers, Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
City Council Minutes Page 7 of 7 June 16, 2026
Ayes: Councilmembers Gaidos, Nibert, Mayor Balch
Noes: Councilmember Testa
Absent: Councilmember Eicher
MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL
Councilmember Testa requested further discussion to increase the number of Main Street closures on first Wednesdays. Matter failed for lack of majority consensus.
Councilmember Nibert requested a draft resolution of support at a future City Council meeting on the FCI facility. Matter failed for lack of majority consensus.
Councilmember Gaidos requested discussion on barrier locations of street closures during Weekends on Main on the south side to permit parking options by Vic's. Matter failed for lack of majority consensus.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Brief reports on conferences, seminars, and meetings attended by the Council Councilmembers reported on regional and local meetings attended.
CITY MANAGER UPDATES
Interim City Manager Calabrigo provided informational updates on the community and organization.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Balch adjourned the meeting at 9:40 p.m.
______________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
MOTION: It was m/s by Nibert/Gaidos to approve the item as recommended. Motion passed by the following vote:
Item #5
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
July 21, 2026
Community and Economic Development
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS OF LOCAL SUPPORT AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO
SUBMIT APPLICATIONS TO THE ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR A TOTAL OF $14,637,500 IN FUNDING FROM THE 2028
COMPREHENSIVE INVESTMENT PLAN FOR THE FOLLOWING FOUR
PROJECTS: 1) THE WEST LAS POSITAS BOULEVARD MULTIMODAL
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT - CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2 (CIP NO. 11514) ($7,050,000); 2) THE I-680/SUNOL BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE
MODERNIZATION PROJECT - CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1 (CIP NO. 15551) ($2,000,000); 3) THE I-580 OVERCROSSING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT - CONSTRUCTION PHASE (CIP NO. 22570) ($4,462,500); AND 4) THE CITY OF PLEASANTON TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE PROJECT ($1,125,000)
SUMMARY
The Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) to solicit applications for the 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan. The 2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan includes a total of $200 million in combined Alameda CTC-administered discretionary local funding sources, including Measure B and BB, Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF), and Transportation Fund for Clear Air (TFCA).
Applications are due at 5:00 PM on July 27, 2026.
Staff recommends submitting funding applications to the Alameda CTC for the following four projects: 1) the West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction Project (construction phase 2 between Stoneridge Drive and Santa Rita Road; CIP No. 11514) in the amount of $7,050,000; 2) the I-680/Sunol Boulevard Interchange Modernization Project (construction phase 1; CIP No. 15551), in the amount of $2,000,000; 3) the I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project (construction phase; CIP No. 22570), in the amount of $4,462,500; and 4)and the Pleasanton Transportation Technology Upgrade project in the amount of $1,125,000. The applications would represent a total of $14,637,500 in funding requests.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize staff to submit four applications to the Alameda CTC for the 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan and authorize the City Manager to execute Resolutions of Local Support for:
1. West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction Project (construction phase 2 between Stoneridge Drive and Santa Rita Road, CIP No. 11514), in the amount of $7,050,000
2. I-680/Sunol Boulevard Interchange Modernization Project, (construction phase 1, CIP
No. 15551), in the amount of $2,000,000
3. I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements (construction phase, CIP No. 22570), in the amount of $4,462,500
4. Pleasanton Transportation Technology Upgrade in the amount of $1,125,000
BACKGROUND
Alameda CTC’s Comprehensive Investment Plan is a near-term strategic planning document that consolidates funding sources administered by Alameda CTC and programs them through a single programming cycle. Alameda CTC’s funding sources for the 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan are: Measure B, Measure BB, Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF), Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA), I-580 Toll Revenues, federal One Bay Area Grant Cycle 4 (OBAG 4), and Community Action Resource and Empowerment (CARE).
The Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan’s purpose is to strategically program available funds toward transportation investments that support the vision and goals of the Alameda CTC’s Countywide Transportation Plan, multi-modal plans, and voter-approved transportation expenditure plans.
In the 2026 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan Cycle, $100 million in funding was available. The City was awarded $750,000 in project design funding for the West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction Project for the section between Stoneridge Drive and Santa Rita Road and $525,000 in project design funding for the I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project.
DISCUSSION
In the 2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan, $200 million is available. The minimum request for Capital Improvement projects is $500,000, the maximum is $10,000,000, and a minimum 25 percent local match is required for each requested phase of the project.
The 2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan funding programming spans fiscal years 2027/28 through 2031/32, with funding allocations in fiscal years 27/28 and 28/29.
Agencies are limited to four applications, with a resolution of local support required for each application. The City of Pleasanton recommends submitting applications for the following four projects:
1) West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction Project (Construction Phase 2), CIP No. 11514 - $7,050,000
Phase 2 of the West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction project will complete the eastern segment of West Las Positas Boulevard (Owens Drive to Fairlands Drive), creating protected intersections at Owens Drive and West Las Positas Boulevard, elevated bike lanes, reconstructed medians, and new sidewalks on the south side of the roadway. The projected construction cost for Phase 2 is $9,400,000. The total request for 2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan funds for this project is $7,050,000, exclusive of the local match. Should funds be awarded, the City will provide a total local match of $2,350,000 from Traffic Impact Fee, Measure BB, and/or Miscellaneous Capital Improvement Project funds to fully fund the project. Authorization to allocate the local match funding would be brought to the City Council at a future meeting.
Phase 1 of the project is partially funded by the 2024 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan ($9,000,000). Phase 2 design is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2026 and is funded through the 2026 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan ($750,000).
2) I-680/Sunol Interchange Modernization Project (Construction Phase 1) - CIP No. 15551 The City, with Caltrans oversight, is in the design phase of the I-680/Sunol Interchange Modernization Project. This project must follow Caltrans’ project development procedures, as the interchange is owned by the State. The City has completed two prior project phases:
Project Study Report – Project Development Support and Project Approval & Environmental Document. Project Design, the current phase, began in late 2024.
The overall project would modernize and improve the operations and safety of the interchange by adding traffic signals at the I-680 northbound and southbound on/off ramps at Sunol Boulevard, adding a multipurpose lane and a high-occupancy toll lane for the southbound I680 on-ramp, widening a portion of the Sunol Boulevard bridge, and improving bicycle facilities between Arlington Drive and the interchange. The estimated total cost for these improvements is $21,100,000. In 2024, the City was awarded $6,000,000 in State Transportation Improvement Funds for construction. Obligation of these funds will occur when the project is ready for bidding. No other construction funds have been identified for this project.
The northbound and southbound on/off ramp intersections with Sunol Boulevard are currently identified as a focused high-injury corridor and intersection in the Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan. Staff proposes splitting the I-680/Sunol Interchange Modernization Project into two phases to expedite safety improvements at the two on- and off-ramp intersections.
Phase 1 will construct two traffic signals at the I-680 northbound and southbound on/off ramps, widening a portion of eastbound Sunol Boulevard, and install striping improvements and bicycle facility improvements at the interchange. The estimated construction cost for Phase 1 is $8,000,000. Completion of the Phase 1 design is anticipated in the first quarter of 2027.
Staff recommends requesting $2,000,000 in 2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan funds and matching it with the already-awarded 2024 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds to address the entire Phase 1 construction cost. The City will continue to progress the design for Phase 2 and identify future construction funding opportunities. 3) I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project (Construction Phase), CIP 22570
This project, which ranks as priority #3 in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, aims to create safer bicycle and pedestrian facilities for traveling to and from Pleasanton and Dublin on the I-580 overcrossings at Hopyard Road, Hacienda Drive, and Santa Rita Road. Construction will include bicycle and pedestrian improvements with protected bicycle lanes, rectangular flashing beacons at each unsignalized crosswalk, upgraded accessible curb ramps, highvisibility crosswalks, and pedestrian hybrid beacons at the multi-lane uncontrolled crossing on Santa Rita Road. The estimated construction cost is $2,580,000.
The 2026 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan allocated $525,000 for project design, with completion anticipated at the end of 2026, after which the project will proceed to the construction phase.
Pleasanton’s proposed improvements terminate at the City of Dublin limits on the northern end of each overcrossing. Dublin separately proposes to improve pavement conditions and address bicycle facility gaps north of each overcrossing at Dougherty Road, Hacienda Drive, and Tassajara Road between the Dublin City limit and Dublin Boulevard through their Local Street Resurfacing at I-580 Interchanges Project.
In consultation with Alameda CTC, staff determined that a joint application between the Cities of Pleasanton and Dublin would elevate the project, as it would represent a regional partnership that provides cross-jurisdictional connections. Dublin’s estimated construction cost for resurfacing and bicycle improvements in their jurisdiction is $3,370,000.
Under this approach, the City of Pleasanton would serve as the lead agency, with the City of Dublin participating as a partner and remaining closely involved to ensure integration with their planned improvements. Dublin would provide a Letter of Commitment to support the application.
The combined estimated construction cost is $5,950,000. For the City of Pleasanton’s portion of the project, staff recommends using future Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article III funds for the $645,000 required local match. Dublin’s local match is $842,500, which will be provided through their Measure BB Local Sales Tax. The total request for 2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan funds for both projects is $4,462,500.
If awarded, staff will return to the City Council with a Memorandum of Understanding, and a cost-sharing agreement with the City of Dublin, and will update the project description for CIP 22570 to include the work in Dublin.
4) Pleasanton Transportation Technology Upgrade
The fourth project addresses a series of investments to upgrade and improve the City's transportation technology:
• Fiber Optic Upgrades. During the 1980s and 1990s, approximately 17.5 miles of copper traffic signal interconnect line was installed throughout the city, primarily in the Hacienda Business Park, and along Foothill Road and Santa Rita Road. As traffic and transportation technology have expanded, the performance of the traffic signal interconnect decreased with additions to the traffic network, such as cameras, video detection, and intersection analysis devices, resulting in communication delays between the City’s traffic operations center and field devices. The decrease in performance also limits the City's ability to add new technology to the network. Staff proposes replacing
7.5 miles of copper interconnect in key corridors with fiber-optic interconnect, which provides superior bandwidth, zero electromagnetic interference, and longer reach than copper.
• Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades. Along with the fiber optic upgrades, the City will replace aging traffic signal controllers at 15 intersections on Foothill Road, Stoneridge Drive, Bernal Avenue, Hopyard Road, Owens Drive, and West Las Positas Boulevard.
The traffic signal controllers are nearing the end of their useful life, and staff recommends proactively upgrading these devices before they fail.
• Enhanced Collision Dashboard. During the development of the Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan (PTSAP), a collision dashboard was created as an analysis tool to track various collision-related attributes. The dashboard also identified a focused high-injury network across all modes of transportation and a network specific to bicycle and pedestrian collisions. This dashboard was essential in identifying where the City should focus its transportation safety work.
The next evolution of this dashboard is to expand it to create new analytical tools that match safety countermeasures to address collisions, track implementation costs, and measure effectiveness. These tools would improve staff's ability to track, visualize, report, and analyze collision data, both for internal use and for inclusion in public-facing reports and documents.
The estimated project cost for the fiber optic, traffic controller, and dashboard upgrade is $1,500,000. Staff recommends using future Fund 201 – Miscellaneous Capital Improvement Project funds to complete the $375,000 required local match. The total request for 2028 Alameda Comprehensive Investment Plan funds is $1,125,000. If awarded, a Pleasanton capital improvement project number will be established as part of an item to request funding acceptance and allocate local matching funds at a future City Council meeting.
Project Eligibility
Each of the City’s proposed projects for the 2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan meets one or more key eligibility requirements for project submission:
• Projects must be included in the 2020 Countywide Transportation Plan project listings (10-year priority, 30-year priority, or Programmatic Projects). • Bike projects must demonstrate a direct benefit to the Countywide Bikeways Network and meet Alameda CTC’s All Ages and Abilities Policy.
• Projects must demonstrate a public benefit towards enhancing, building, and maintaining the multimodal transportation infrastructure in Alameda County. • Projects may include new or upgraded bicycle/pedestrian facilities, bicycle lane striping, designated pedestrian path markings, signage/signals, bicycle parking, street reconfigurations, street closures, and bicycle/pedestrian safety improvements. • Projects that improve transportation safety.
• Technology projects that facilitate safety through operations, controller upgrades, and traffic signal interconnection.
The Alameda CTC anticipates issuing grant award recommendations in May 2027.
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
This grant, if received, advances Climate Action Plan (CAP 2.0) Strategy TLU-2 E3, Implement Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan, Strategy TLU-2 E5. Implement Complete Streets Program.
The proposed projects in the grant include safety improvements that will benefit youth, seniors, pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. Having a convenient, safe, and comfortable multimodal transportation network is critical to supporting users of all ages and abilities, improving transportation options, and benefiting the environment.
OUTREACH
2018 Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan
The grant funding requests are consistent with the priorities established through the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan, including bicycle and pedestrian improvements for both the West Las Positas Boulevard (priority #1) and the I-580 overcrossings (priority #3) in the 2018 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Extensive outreach was conducted for the Master Plan, including Bicycle-Pedestrian Trails Committee meetings, community meetings, and field walks.
Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan
The grant funding requests are also consistent with the priorities in the recently-adopted 2026 PTSAP. The intersection of I-680 on and off-ramps with Sunol Boulevard is identified in the high-injury network in the 2026 PTSAP due to the concentration of injury-related collisions over a five-year span. The dashboard was created as an analysis tool to track various collisionrelated attributes and was instrumental in presenting data and analysis during PTSAP community meetings. A total of 16 outreach meetings were held, including stakeholder, community, and citywide meetings with civic organizations. The PTSAP was approved by the City Council on May 19, 2026.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Approval of this action advances the ONE Pleasanton citywide Strategic Plan Goal Funding Our Future A.2. to “identify expanded and new revenue sources to address significant infrastructure needs” and Investing in Our Environment, C.1. to “implement the four-year CIP to complete design and construction of budgeted capital projects.” This action will allow the opportunity for the City to receive significant new grant funding in support of planned capital improvement projects.
FISCAL IMPACT
Upon Council authorization, the City will submit four 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan applications to the Alameda CTC requesting (if awarded, grant funds will be placed in Fund 162):
• $7,050,000 for West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction Project (construction phase 2 between Stoneridge Drive and Santa Rita Road), CIP No. 11514 • $2,000,000 for I-680/Sunol Boulevard Interchange Modernization Project (construction phase 1), CIP No. 15551
• $4,462,500 for the I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project (construction phase), CIP No. 22570
• $1,500,000 for the Pleasanton Transportation Technology Upgrade Project A 25 percent local match is required for each project phase (e.g., design or construction).
Awarded projects will be allocated funds across fiscal years 2027/28-2031/2032. Staff are requesting an allocation starting in FY27/28, although Alameda CTC reserves the right to assign a different year depending on funding and project submissions. Below is a breakdown of the proposed project funding and allocation by year.
The total project cost for construction of the West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction Project (Phase 2 Stoneridge Drive to Santa Rita Road), CIP No. 11514 is
$9,400,000.
Construction FY27/28
2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan Request $7,050,000 Local Match – Future Measure BB, TIF $2,350,000
Total $9,400,000 (Construction)
The total project cost for construction of the I-680/Sunol Boulevard Interchange Modernization Project (Phase 1), CIP No. 15551 is $8,000,000 of which $6,000,000 has already been secured.
Construction FY27/28
2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan Request $2,000,000 Local Match – State Transportation Improvement Program FY24 $6,000,000 Total $8,000,000 (Construction)
The total project cost for design and construction of the I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project (Construction Phase), CIP No. 22570 is $5,950,000.
Construction FY27/28
2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan Request $4,462,500 Pleasanton Local Match – Future TDA Article III $645,000 Dublin Local Match - Future Measure BB Local Sales Tax $842,500 Total $5,950,000 (Construction)
The total project cost for the Pleasanton Transportation Technology Update Project is $1,500,000.
Construction FY27/28
2028 Alameda CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan Request $1,125,000
Local Match – Fund 201 Miscellaneous Capital Improvement Projects
$375,000
Total $1,500,000 (Construction)
Should the Alameda CTC award 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan funds to the City, staff will return to Council with funding agreements and seek authorization for any necessary budget adjustments, including appropriation of funds necessary for local match, a project description update to include Dublin's participation in CIP 22570, a request to establish a new Capital Improvement Project for the Transportation Technology Upgrade Project, and amendments to revenue and expenditure budgets to account for the grant funding.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Cedric Novenario, Senior
Transportation Engineer
Ellen Clark, Director of Community and
Economic Development
Joe Calabrigo, Interim
City Manager
Attachments:
1. Resolution of Local Support – West Las Positas Multimodal Reconstruction Project (Stoneridge Drive to Santa Rita Road), CIP 11514
2. Resolution of Local Support – I-680/Sunol Boulevard Interchange Modernization Project, CIP 15551
3. Resolution of Local Support – I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project, CIP 22570
4. Resolution of Local Support – Pleasanton Transportation Technology Upgrade Project
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR ALAMEDA COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADMINISTERED FUNDING FOR THE
WEST LAS POSITAS MULTIMODAL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT –
PHASE 2 (IRON HORSE TRAIL TO SANTA RITA ROAD), CIP 11514 AND
COMMITTING ANY NECESSARY MATCHING FUNDS AND STATING
ASSURANCES TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (“Alameda CTC”) administers funding programs for projects and programs that benefit the Alameda County transportation system, consisting of 2000 Measure B, 2010 Vehicle Registration Fee (“VRF”), 2014 Measure BB, I-580 Toll Revenues, Congestion Management Agency Transportation Improvement Program (CMA-TIP), and Transportation Fund for Clean Air Programs, and such funding is collectively defined as and shall be referenced herein as the “Alameda CTC Administered Funds”; and
WHEREAS, the Alameda CTC adopted 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan (“CIP”) Guidelines at its Commission meeting on May 28, 2026 which includes procedures governing the 2028 CIP application process, programming guidelines, and eligible uses of Alameda CTC Administered Funds;
WHEREAS, City of Pleasanton (“Applicant”) is the project sponsor for West Las Positas Multimodal Reconstruction Project- Phase 2 (Iron Horse Trail to Santa Rita Road), CIP 11514 (“Project”).
WHEREAS, the Project will implement a protected intersection at Owens Drive and West Las Positas Boulevard, elevated bike lanes, reconstructed medians, and new sidewalk on the south side of the roadway; and
WHEREAS, as the Project Sponsor, Applicant has the legal authority to apply for funding for Project and plans to submit a 2028 CIP application (“Application”) to Alameda CTC for $7,050,000.
WHEREAS, there are no legal impediments to Applicant applying for funding and there is no active, pending or threatened litigation that may adversely affect the proposed Project or the ability of Applicant to deliver such Project; and WHEREAS, Applicant authorizes its interim City Manager or designee to execute and file an application with Alameda CTC for discretionary Alameda CTC Administered Funds for the Project as referenced in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, as part of the requirements to apply and receive Alameda CTC
ATTACHMENT 1
Administered Funds, Alameda CTC requires a resolution adopted by the responsible implementing agency stating the following:
1. Applicant will implement the Project as described in the Application; and
2. Applicant will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the Project within the time period identified in the Application; and
3. Applicant understands it will enter into a Project Funding Agreement (“Agreement”) with Alameda CTC, and will comply with the Agreement ’s requirements, including adherence to the agreed upon project scope, project delivery milestones, funding deadlines, project reporting and deliverable deadlines; and
4. Applicant is committed to deliver the Project consistently with the Commission approved CIP Programming Guidelines and CIP policies, as they may change, for the funds awarded by the Commission to the Project; and
5. Applicant is committed to secure matching funds as proposed in the Application required for awarded Alameda CTC Administered Funds, by phase; and
6. Applicant is committed to provide any additional funding that may be required beyond the original proposed Application match amount to deliver the phase of the Project that is awarded with Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
7. Applicant understands that Alameda CTC Administered Funds awarded to the Project is limited to the Commission approved programmed amount by phase, and therefore any cost increases or unexpected funding shortfalls cannot be expected to be funded by shifting funds between phases, or by requesting additional Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
8. Applicant understands that any cost savings in the Alameda CTC-funded phase(s) will be shared proportionally between Applicant and Alameda CTC; and
9. Applicant is committed to comply with the applicable requirements set forth in Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (“LBCE”) Program and related exhibits, as applicable, for professional services and construction contracts funded with Measure B, Measure BB, and/or VRF funds, such as including LBCE Program goal(s) and provisions in applicable solicitations and resulting contracts, providing timely notification to Alameda CTC of applicable solicitations prior to advertisement, and adhering to reporting requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Applicant is authorized to file an Application to Alameda CTC for funding for the Project; and be it further RESOLVED that Applicant hereby confirms that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect Applicant’s ability to implement and deliver the proposed Project; and be it further RESOLVED that Applicant authorizes its interim City Manager designee to execute the funding Agreement with Alameda CTC; and be it further
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLVED that Applicant shall provide Alameda CTC with a fully-executed copy of this Resolution concurrently with submittal of the Application; and be it further RESOLVED that the City of Pleasanton, Applicant, by adopting this resolution, hereby confirms that:
1. Applicant will commit to implementing the Project as described in the Application; and
2. Applicant will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the Project within the time period identified in the application; and
3. Applicant understands it will enter into an Agreement with Alameda CTC, and will comply with the Agreement ’s requirements, including adherence to the completion of the agreed upon project scope, project delivery milestones, funding deadlines, project reporting and deliverable deadlines; and
4. Applicant commits to delivering the Project consistently with the Commission approved CIP Programming Guidelines and CIP policies, as they may change, for the funds awarded by the Commission to the Project; and
5. Applicant will commit matching funds as proposed in the Application against the awarded Alameda CTC Administered Funds by phase in the amount(s) of $2,35,000 for the construction phase anticipated to be from City Traffic Impact Fees, Measure BB and local source(s); and
6. Applicant will provide any additional funding that may be required beyond the original proposed Application match amount to deliver the phase of the Project that is awarded with Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
7. Applicant understands that Alameda CTC Administered Funds awarded to the Project are limited to the Commission approved programmed amount by phase, and therefore any cost increases or unexpected funding shortfalls cannot be expected to be funded by shifting funds between phases, or by requesting additional Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
8. Applicant understands that any cost savings in the Alameda CTC-funded phase(s) will be shared proportionally between Applicant and Alameda CTC; and
9. Applicant will comply with the applicable requirements set forth in Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (“LBCE”) Program and related exhibits, as applicable, for professional services and construction contracts funded with Measure B, Measure BB, and/or VRF funds, such as including LBCE Program goal(s) and provisions in applicable solicitations and resulting contracts, providing timely notification to Alameda CTC of applicable solicitations prior to advertisement, and adhering to reporting requirements.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on July 21, 2026.
ATTACHMENT 1
I, Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of July 2026, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR ALAMEDA COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADMINISTERED FUNDING FOR
I-680/SUNOL BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE MODERNIZATION PROJECT (PHASE 1), CIP 15551 AND COMMITTING ANY NECESSARY MATCHING
FUNDS AND STATING ASSURANCES TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (“ALAMEDA CTC”) administers funding programs for projects and programs that benefit the Alameda County transportation system, consisting of 2000 Measure B, 2010 Vehicle Registration Fee (“VRF”), 2014 Measure BB, I-580 Toll Revenues, Congestion Management Agency Transportation Improvement Program (CMA-TIP), and Transportation Fund for Clean Air Programs, and such funding is collectively defined as and shall be referenced herein as the “Alameda CTC Administered Funds”; and
WHEREAS, the Alameda CTC adopted 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan (“CIP”) Guidelines at its Commission meeting on May 28, 2026 which includes procedures governing the 2028 CIP application process, programming guidelines, and eligible uses of Alameda CTC Administered Funds;
WHEREAS, Pleasanton (“Applicant”) is the project sponsor for I-680/Sunol Boulevard Interchange Modernization (Phase 1), CIP 15551 (“Project”).
WHEREAS, the Project will construct two traffic signals at the I-680 northbound and southbound on/off ramps, widening a portion of eastbound Sunol Boulevard, striping improvements and bicycle facility improvements at the interchange; and WHEREAS, as the Project Sponsor, Applicant has the legal authority to apply for funding for Project and plans to submit a 2028 CIP application (“Application”) to Alameda CTC for $2,000,000.
WHEREAS, there are no legal impediments to Applicant applying for funding and there is no active, pending or threatened litigation that may adversely affect the proposed Project or the ability of Applicant to deliver such Project; and WHEREAS, Applicant authorizes its interim City Manager or designee to execute and file an application with Alameda CTC for discretionary Alameda CTC Administered Funds for the Project as referenced in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, as part of the requirements to apply and receive Alameda CTC Administered Funds, Alameda CTC requires a resolution adopted by the responsible implementing agency stating the following:
ATTACHMENT 2
1. Applicant will implement the Project as described in the Application; and
2. Applicant will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the Project within the time period identified in the Application; and
3. Applicant understands it will enter into a Project Funding Agreement (“Agreement”) with Alameda CTC, and will comply with the Agreement ’s requirements, including adherence to the agreed upon project scope, project delivery milestones, funding deadlines, project reporting and deliverable deadlines; and
4. Applicant is committed to deliver the Project consistently with the Commission approved CIP Programming Guidelines and CIP policies, as they may change, for the funds awarded by the Commission to the Project; and
5. Applicant is committed to secure matching funds as proposed in the Application required for awarded Alameda CTC Administered Funds, by phase; and
6. Applicant is committed to provide any additional funding that may be required beyond the original proposed Application match amount to deliver the phase of the Project that is awarded with Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
7. Applicant understands that Alameda CTC Administered Funds awarded to the Project is limited to the Commission approved programmed amount by phase, and therefore any cost increases or unexpected funding shortfalls cannot be expected to be funded by shifting funds between phases, or by requesting additional Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
8. Applicant understands that any cost savings in the Alameda CTC-funded phase(s) will be shared proportionally between Applicant and Alameda CTC; and
9. Applicant is committed to comply with the applicable requirements set forth in Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (“LBCE”) Program and related exhibits, as applicable, for professional services and construction contracts funded with Measure B, Measure BB, and/or VRF funds, such as including LBCE Program goal(s) and provisions in applicable solicitations and resulting contracts, providing timely notification to Alameda CTC of applicable solicitations prior to advertisement, and adhering to reporting requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Applicant is authorized to file an Application to Alameda CTC for funding for the Project; and be it further RESOLVED that Applicant hereby confirms that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect Applicant’s ability to implement and deliver the proposed Project; and be it further RESOLVED that Applicant authorizes its interim City Manager designee to execute the funding Agreement with Alameda CTC; and be it further RESOLVED that Applicant shall provide Alameda CTC with a fully-executed
ATTACHMENT 2
copy of this Resolution concurrently with submittal of the Application; and be it further RESOLVED that the City of Pleasanton, Applicant, by adopting this resolution, hereby confirms that:
1. Applicant will commit to implementing the Project as described in the Application; and
2. Applicant will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the Project within the time period identified in the application; and
3. Applicant understands it will enter into an Agreement with Alameda CTC, and will comply with the Agreement ’s requirements, including adherence to the completion of the agreed upon project scope, project delivery milestones, funding deadlines, project reporting and deliverable deadlines; and
4. Applicant commits to delivering the Project consistently with the Commission approved CIP Programming Guidelines and CIP policies, as they may change, for the funds awarded by the Commission to the Project; and
5. Applicant will commit matching funds as proposed in the Application against the awarded Alameda CTC Administered Funds by phase in the amount(s) of $6,000,000 for the construction phase anticipated to be State Transportation Improvement Program funds; and
6. Applicant will provide any additional funding that may be required beyond the original proposed Application match amount to deliver the phase of the Project that is awarded with Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
7. Applicant understands that Alameda CTC Administered Funds awarded to the Project are limited to the Commission approved programmed amount by phase, and therefore any cost increases or unexpected funding shortfalls cannot be expected to be funded by shifting funds between phases, or by requesting additional Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
8. Applicant understands that any cost savings in the Alameda CTC-funded phase(s) will be shared proportionally between Applicant and Alameda CTC; and
9. Applicant will comply with the applicable requirements set forth in Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (“LBCE”) Program and related exhibits, as applicable, for professional services and construction contracts funded with Measure B, Measure BB, and/or VRF funds, such as including LBCE Program goal(s) and provisions in applicable solicitations and resulting contracts, providing timely notification to Alameda CTC of applicable solicitations prior to advertisement, and adhering to reporting requirements.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on July 21, 2026.
ATTACHMENT 2
I, Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of July 2026, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADMINISTERED FUNDING FOR I-580
OVERCROSSING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS
(CONSTRUCTION PHASE), CIP 22570 AND COMMITTING ANY NECESSARY
MATCHING FUNDS AND STATING ASSURANCES TO COMPLETE THE
PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (“Alameda CTC”) administers funding programs for projects and programs that benefit the Alameda County transportation system, consisting of 2000 Measure B, 2010 Vehicle Registration Fee (“VRF”), 2014 Measure BB, I-580 Toll Revenues, Congestion Management Agency Transportation Improvement Program (CMA-TIP), and Transportation Fund for Clean Air Programs, and such funding is collectively defined as and shall be referenced herein as the “Alameda CTC Administered Funds”; and
WHEREAS, the Alameda CTC adopted 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan (“CIP”) Guidelines at its Commission meeting on May 28, 2026 which includes procedures governing the 2028 CIP application process, programming guidelines, and eligible uses of Alameda CTC Administered Funds;
WHEREAS, Pleasanton (“Applicant”) is the project sponsor for the I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements (Construction Phase), CIP 22570 (“Project”).
WHEREAS, the in the City of Pleasanton, the Project will construct protected bicycle lanes, travel lane restriping, rectangular flashing beacons, upgraded accessible curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and pedestrian hybrid beacon at the multilane uncontrolled crossing on Santa Rita Road; in the City of Dublin, the Project will resurface Dougherty Road, Hacienda Drive, and Tassajara Road between I-580 and Dublin Boulevard, implement travel lane restriping, and add protected bicycle lanes; and WHEREAS, as the Project Sponsor, Applicant has the legal authority to apply for funding for Project and plans to submit a 2028 CIP application (“Application”) to Alameda CTC for $4,462,500.
WHEREAS, there are no legal impediments to Applicant applying for funding and there is no active, pending or threatened litigation that may adversely affect the proposed Project or the ability of Applicant to deliver such Project; and WHEREAS, Applicant authorizes its interim City Manager or designee to execute and file an application with Alameda CTC for discretionary Alameda CTC Administered
ATTACHMENT 3
Funds for the Project as referenced in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, as part of the requirements to apply and receive Alameda CTC Administered Funds, Alameda CTC requires a resolution adopted by the responsible implementing agency stating the following:
1. Applicant will implement the Project as described in the Application; and
2. Applicant will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the Project within the time period identified in the Application; and
3. Applicant understands it will enter into a Project Funding Agreement (“Agreement”) with Alameda CTC, and will comply with the Agreement ’s requirements, including adherence to the agreed upon project scope, project delivery milestones, funding deadlines, project reporting and deliverable deadlines; and
4. Applicant is committed to deliver the Project consistently with the Commission approved CIP Programming Guidelines and CIP policies, as they may change, for the funds awarded by the Commission to the Project; and
5. Applicant is committed to secure matching funds as proposed in the Application required for awarded Alameda CTC Administered Funds, by phase; and
6. Applicant is committed to provide any additional funding that may be required beyond the original proposed Application match amount to deliver the phase of the Project that is awarded with Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
7. Applicant understands that Alameda CTC Administered Funds awarded to the Project is limited to the Commission approved programmed amount by phase, and therefore any cost increases or unexpected funding shortfalls cannot be expected to be funded by shifting funds between phases, or by requesting additional Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
8. Applicant understands that any cost savings in the Alameda CTC-funded phase(s) will be shared proportionally between Applicant and Alameda CTC; and
9. Applicant is committed to comply with the applicable requirements set forth in Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (“LBCE”) Program and related exhibits, as applicable, for professional services and construction contracts funded with Measure B, Measure BB, and/or VRF funds, such as including LBCE Program goal(s) and provisions in applicable solicitations and resulting contracts, providing timely notification to Alameda CTC of applicable solicitations prior to advertisement, and adhering to reporting requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Applicant is authorized to file an Application to Alameda CTC for funding for the Project; and be it further RESOLVED that Applicant hereby confirms that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect Applicant’s ability to implement and deliver the proposed Project; and be it further
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLVED that Applicant authorizes its interim City Manager designee to execute the funding Agreement with Alameda CTC; and be it further RESOLVED that Applicant shall provide Alameda CTC with a fully-executed copy of this Resolution concurrently with submittal of the Application; and be it further RESOLVED that the City of Pleasanton, Applicant, by adopting this resolution, hereby confirms that:
1. Applicant will commit to implementing the Project as described in the Application; and
2. Applicant will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the Project within the time period identified in the application; and
3. Applicant understands it will enter into an Agreement with Alameda CTC, and will comply with the Agreement ’s requirements, including adherence to the completion of the agreed upon project scope, project delivery milestones, funding deadlines, project reporting and deliverable deadlines; and
4. Applicant commits to delivering the Project consistently with the Commission approved CIP Programming Guidelines and CIP policies, as they may change, for the funds awarded by the Commission to the Project; and
5. Applicant will commit matching funds as proposed in the Application against the awarded Alameda CTC Administered Funds by phase in the amount of $645,000 for the construction phase anticipated to be from City TDA Article III for the City of Pleasanton, and $842,500 for the construction phase anticipated to be from Measure BB Local Sales Tax from the City of Dublin; and
6. Applicant will provide any additional funding that may be required beyond the original proposed Application match amount to deliver the phase of the Project that is awarded with Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
7. Applicant understands that Alameda CTC Administered Funds awarded to the Project are limited to the Commission approved programmed amount by phase, and therefore any cost increases or unexpected funding shortfalls cannot be expected to be funded by shifting funds between phases, or by requesting additional Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
8. Applicant understands that any cost savings in the Alameda CTC-funded phase(s) will be shared proportionally between Applicant and Alameda CTC; and
9. Applicant will comply with the applicable requirements set forth in Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (“LBCE”) Program and related exhibits, as applicable, for professional services and construction contracts funded with Measure B, Measure BB, and/or VRF funds, such as including LBCE Program goal(s) and provisions in applicable solicitations and resulting contracts, providing timely notification to Alameda CTC of applicable
ATTACHMENT 3
solicitations prior to advertisement, and adhering to reporting requirements.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on July 21, 2026.
I, Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of July 2026, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT 4
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR ALAMEDA COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADMINISTERED FUNDING PLEASANTON
TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE PROJECT AND COMMITTING
ANY NECESSARY MATCHING FUNDS AND STATING ASSURANCES TO
COMPLETE THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (“Alameda CTC”) administers funding programs for projects and programs that benefit the Alameda County transportation system, consisting of 2000 Measure B, 2010 Vehicle Registration Fee (“VRF”), 2014 Measure BB, I-580 Toll Revenues, Congestion Management Agency Transportation Improvement Program (CMA-TIP), and Transportation Fund for Clean Air Programs, and such funding is collectively defined as and shall be referenced herein as the “Alameda CTC Administered Funds”; and
WHEREAS, the Alameda CTC adopted 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan (“CIP”) Guidelines at its Commission meeting on May 28, 2026 which includes procedures governing the 2028 CIP application process, programming guidelines, and eligible uses of Alameda CTC Administered Funds;
WHEREAS, Pleasanton (“Applicant”) is the project sponsor for the Pleasanton Transportation Technology Upgrade (“Project”).
WHEREAS, the Project will replace copper interconnect with new fiber optic interconnect, upgrade traffic signal controllers and upgrade the Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan collision dashboard; and WHEREAS, as the Project Sponsor, Applicant has the legal authority to apply for funding for Project and plans to submit a 2028 CIP application (“Application”) to Alameda CTC for $1,125,000.
WHEREAS, there are no legal impediments to Applicant applying for funding and there is no active, pending or threatened litigation that may adversely affect the proposed Project or the ability of Applicant to deliver such Project; and WHEREAS, Applicant authorizes its interim City Manager or designee to execute and file an application with Alameda CTC for discretionary Alameda CTC Administered Funds for the Project as referenced in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, as part of the requirements to apply and receive Alameda CTC Administered Funds, Alameda CTC requires a resolution adopted by the responsible implementing agency stating the following:
ATTACHMENT 4
1. Applicant will implement the Project as described in the Application; and
2. Applicant will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the Project within the time period identified in the Application; and
3. Applicant understands it will enter into a Project Funding Agreement (“Agreement”) with Alameda CTC, and will comply with the Agreement ’s requirements, including adherence to the agreed upon project scope, project delivery milestones, funding deadlines, project reporting and deliverable deadlines; and
4. Applicant is committed to deliver the Project consistently with the Commission approved CIP Programming Guidelines and CIP policies, as they may change, for the funds awarded by the Commission to the Project; and
5. Applicant is committed to secure matching funds as proposed in the Application required for awarded Alameda CTC Administered Funds, by phase; and
6. Applicant is committed to provide any additional funding that may be required beyond the original proposed Application match amount to deliver the phase of the Project that is awarded with Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
7. Applicant understands that Alameda CTC Administered Funds awarded to the Project is limited to the Commission approved programmed amount by phase, and therefore any cost increases or unexpected funding shortfalls cannot be expected to be funded by shifting funds between phases, or by requesting additional Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
8. Applicant understands that any cost savings in the Alameda CTC-funded phase(s) will be shared proportionally between Applicant and Alameda CTC; and
9. Applicant is committed to comply with the applicable requirements set forth in Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (“LBCE”) Program and related exhibits, as applicable, for professional services and construction contracts funded with Measure B, Measure BB, and/or VRF funds, such as including LBCE Program goal(s) and provisions in applicable solicitations and resulting contracts, providing timely notification to Alameda CTC of applicable solicitations prior to advertisement, and adhering to reporting requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Applicant is authorized to file an Application to Alameda CTC for funding for the Project; and be it further RESOLVED that Applicant hereby confirms that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect Applicant’s ability to implement and deliver the proposed Project; and be it further RESOLVED that Applicant authorizes its interim City Manager designee to execute the funding Agreement with Alameda CTC; and be it further RESOLVED that Applicant shall provide Alameda CTC with a fully-executed
ATTACHMENT 4
copy of this Resolution concurrently with submittal of the Application; and be it further RESOLVED that the City of Pleasanton, Applicant, by adopting this resolution, hereby confirms that:
1. Applicant will commit to implementing the Project as described in the Application; and
2. Applicant will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the Project within the time period identified in the application; and
3. Applicant understands it will enter into an Agreement with Alameda CTC, and will comply with the Agreement ’s requirements, including adherence to the completion of the agreed upon project scope, project delivery milestones, funding deadlines, project reporting and deliverable deadlines; and
4. Applicant commits to delivering the Project consistently with the Commission approved CIP Programming Guidelines and CIP policies, as they may change, for the funds awarded by the Commission to the Project; and
5. Applicant will commit matching funds as proposed in the Application against the awarded Alameda CTC Administered Funds by phase in the amount of $375,000 for the construction phase anticipated to be from local miscellaneous capital improvement sources; and
6. Applicant will provide any additional funding that may be required beyond the original proposed Application match amount to deliver the phase of the Project that is awarded with Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
7. Applicant understands that Alameda CTC Administered Funds awarded to the Project are limited to the Commission approved programmed amount by phase, and therefore any cost increases or unexpected funding shortfalls cannot be expected to be funded by shifting funds between phases, or by requesting additional Alameda CTC Administered Funds; and
8. Applicant understands that any cost savings in the Alameda CTC-funded phase(s) will be shared proportionally between Applicant and Alameda CTC; and
9. Applicant will comply with the applicable requirements set forth in Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (“LBCE”) Program and related exhibits, as applicable, for professional services and construction contracts funded with Measure B, Measure BB, and/or VRF funds, such as including LBCE Program goal(s) and provisions in applicable solicitations and resulting contracts, providing timely notification to Alameda CTC of applicable solicitations prior to advertisement, and adhering to reporting requirements.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on July 21, 2026.
ATTACHMENT 4
I, Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of July 2026, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
Item #6
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
July 21, 2026
Finance
TITLE: ACCEPT THE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR MAY 2026
SUMMARY
Attached is the City of Pleasanton monthly disbursements and investment report for May 2026.
RECOMMENDATION
Accept claim disbursements in the amount of $21,743,265 and the investment report for the month of May 2026.
BACKGROUND
The City's Investment Policy requires the Director of Finance to submit a monthly transaction report to the City Council within 60 days of the end of the reporting period in accordance with California Government Code Section 53607.
The Investment Policy also requires the Director of Finance to submit a quarterly report to the City Council on the status of the City's investment portfolio no later than 45 days after the end of each month. This report shall include the types of investments, the amount of money invested with various institutions, purchase and maturity dates, and yield on investments. The Director of Finance affirms that the investment portfolio complies with the investment policy and will meet cash flow needs for the next six months.
This report also includes check and electronic payment information for May 2026.
DISCUSSION
The monthly disbursements and investment report provides transparency of the City’s financial transactions and payments for review by the City Council.
The City has transitioned to a new reporting format that incorporates Chandler Asset Management's Investment Report, beginning with the report for the month ended April 2026.
The average purchase yield (also known as book yield) indicates the annual rate at which the City is currently earning income. The average market yield indicates the average rate at which new and maturing funds are reinvested. The City uses total return to demonstrate how the portfolio has grown over time. Total return includes growth from income (including accrual), realized gains and losses as a result of a sale before maturity, and unrealized gains and losses (gains and losses on paper) as a result of changes in market value. Total return is compared to the City’s risk and performance measuring benchmark that is similar in duration to the City’s portfolio duration: ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index.
The total investment portfolio (market value) consists of $205,293,358 managed by Chandler Asset Management, and $74,479,912 invested by the City in Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and Certificates of Deposit. The average market yield of the Chandler portfolio and the City Managed Investments were 4.11% and 3.81% respectively. These figures reflect the rate at which new and maturing funds are being reinvested.
The City’s investment portfolio for this period totaled $279,773,271 (market value) with a weighted average market yield of 4.02%. The total investment portfolio balance fluctuates throughout the year due to normal cash flow needs and includes both discretionary and restricted funds.
Table 1. Asset Composition
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Not applicable, as this item is a routine administrative matter of City business.
OUTREACH
No outreach was conducted, as this item is a routine administrative matter of City business.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Not applicable, as this item is a routine administrative matter.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with acceptance of this report.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Dawn DeMarcus, Senior
Budget and Finance Analyst
Susan Hsieh, Director of Finance Joe Calabrigo, Interim City Manager
Attachments:
1. Disbursements & Investments Report
Attachment 1
May 2026 DISBURSEMENTS
CHECK REGISTER*
DATE CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT
5/1/2026 87078-87226 $ 962,070
5/7/2026 87233-87365 4,075,080
5/14/2026 87381-87525 2,119,295
5/22/2026 87534-87682 1,244,334
5/28/2026 87703-87830 3,501,893
$ 11,902,672
ACH PAYMENTS
DATE CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT
5/1/2026 87065-87077 453,598 $
5/7/2026 87227-87232 622,688
5/14/2026 87366, 87368-87380 2,273,345
5/22/2026 87526-87528, 87530-87531, 87533 57,271
5/28/2026 87683-87702 1,927,648
Payroll & Tax Related ACH Payments 928,706
$ 6,263,256
WIRE TRANSFERS
DATE AMOUNT
$ -
PAYROLL TRANSFERS
DATE AMOUNT
5/13/2026 1,816,058 $
5/28/2026 1,761,279
$ 3,577,337
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $ 21,743,265
* Detailed registers available upon request.
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Account Summary Credit Quality* Total Rate of Return** 1M 3M YTD 1YR 2YRS 3YRS 5YRS 10YRS (07/01/25) City of Pleasanton Mgd Account 0.12% Benchmark Return 0.03% 0.16% 2.19 AA+ End Values as of 04/30/2026 End Values as of 05/31/2026 Market Value Accrued Interest Total Market Value 195,049,594.84 205,293,358.33 Par Book Value Cost Value United States Money Market Fund JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.21% Farm Credit System 1.23% 1.16%
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance Status Notes AGENCY MORTGAGE SECURITIES 100.0 30.0 3.3 20.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CAMP 30.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 COMMERCIAL PAPER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CORPORATE MEDIUM TERM NOTES 30.0 2.2 0.0 0.0
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance Status Notes 30.0 0.0 0.0 FEDERAL AGENCIES 100.0 30.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MUTUAL FUNDS 20.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance Status Notes 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 10.0 1.0 2 0.0 0.0 U.S. TREASURIES 100.0
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 RECONCILIATION SUMMARY Month to Date Fiscal Year to Date (07/01/2025) Beginning Book Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 Purchases Sales Month to Date Fiscal Year to Date (07/01/2025) Beginning Market Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 Purchases Sales Month to Date 0.00 Fiscal Year to Date (26,585,000.00) Month to Date 0.00 Fiscal Year to Date 0.00 Purchases Month to Date 27,909,280.20 Fiscal Year to Date 203,800,209.34 Sales Month to Date (17,736,391.33) Fiscal Year to Date (159,605,049.37) Month to Date 203,114.69 Fiscal Year to Date 3,895,229.94 Purchased / Sold Interest Month to Date (30,678.57) Fiscal Year to Date (709,165.38)
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 HOLDINGS REPORT Cusip Par Value/ Units Purchase Date Purchase Yield Cost Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss S&P/ Fitch Maturity 129.21 0.09% NA/AAA AAA 0.39% Aaa/NA AAA 01/12/2026 0.29% NA/AAA AAA 01/22/2029 02/03/2026 NA/AAA AAA 03/20/2029 100.01 0.31% NA/AAA AAA 0.61% NA/AAA AAA 1,260,000.00 0.62% NA/AAA AAA Aaa/NA AAA 100.19 0.13% NA/AAA AAA 1.19 01/13/2026 0.26% Aaa/NA AAA 3.63 03/10/2026 0.32% Aaa/NA AAA 1.69 01/13/2026 99.19 Aaa/AAA NA 09/23/2030 930,000.00 02/10/2026 3.03% 99.00 920,660.01 Aaa/NA AAA 100.03 0.69% NA/AAA AAA 2.11 10/21/2030 690,000.00 03/12/2026 Aaa/NA AAA 3.02% Aaa/AAA NA 2.16 12/16/2030 Aaa/AAA NA 2.21
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 HOLDINGS REPORT Cusip Par Value/ Units Purchase Date Purchase Yield Cost Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss S&P/ Fitch Maturity 02/10/2026 1,239,916.30 1,239,921.02 0.60% NA/AAA AAA 2.09 15,265,000.00 4.13% 15,262,907.11 15,263,062.81 99.57 4.34% 15,199,213.89 23,897.23 7.46% (63,848.92) 3.66 1.81 AGENCY 3,000,000.00 0.92% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 12/09/2021 3.92% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 12/09/2021 3.92% 0.26% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 3130APVC6 3,000,000.00 12/09/2021 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 3,000,000.00 12/22/2021 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 6,000,000.00 2.90% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 3,000,000.00 12/30/2021 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3.91% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 3,000,000.00 12/30/2021 1.39% 3.91% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 3,000,000.00 1.93% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 0.66 3,000,000.00 2.11% 2,999,333.06 3.91% Aa1/AA+ AA+ Total Agency 29,370,000.00 1.48% 29,288,015.89 29,360,706.51 98.77 3.91% 29,009,123.61 155,432.83 14.24% (351,582.90) 0.53 0.52 03/26/2026 Aaa/AA+ AA+ 2,000,000.00 0.93% Aa1/AA+ AAA 3.32 3,795,000.00 4.34% 3,657,976.76 3,660,164.33 96.59 4.31% 3,664,448.77 9,974.63 1.80% 4,284.43 3.00 2.75
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 HOLDINGS REPORT Cusip Par Value/ Units Purchase Date Purchase Yield Cost Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss S&P/ Fitch Maturity CASH 1.00 0.00 0.22% 0.00 Aaa/AAA AAA 0.00 0.00 Total Cash 452,661.81 452,661.81 452,661.81 1.00 452,661.81 0.00 0.22% 0.00 0.00 0.00 CORPORATE 1.1 06/22/2026 3,000,000.00 06/22/2021 0.00% 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 AA 0.06 0.06 A1/A A+ 1.31 1,000,000.00 1.30 NA 100.60 Aa3/A A1/A 1.92 0.61% A1/A NA 2.12 1.99 99.00 0.36% A+ 1.09 0.61% A2/A NA 2.29 3.91% 1,102.29 A1/AA 2.33 0.36% 2.62 01/16/2029 100.63 A1/A A+ 2.63
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 HOLDINGS REPORT Cusip Par Value/ Units Purchase Date Purchase Yield Cost Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss S&P/ Fitch Maturity A1/A 01/31/2029 101.29 A1/A+ NA 100.33 0.62% Aa3/A 100.30 A3/A A+ A3/A NA 2.69 1,000,000.00 NA 02/26/2029 2,000,000.00 1.00% NA 99.92 03/19/2026 100.20 0.21% A2/A+ NA 101.13 NA 1,000,000.00 1,029,130.00 2.62 A2/A+ A 2.96 1,000,000.00 A1/A NA 2.96 A+ 1.96 99.69 A 1.99 2.00 A1/A
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 HOLDINGS REPORT Cusip Par Value/ Units Purchase Date Purchase Yield Cost Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss S&P/ Fitch Maturity 100.11 2,931.26 NA 3.21 2.93 A2/A A 3.21 12/03/2029 Aa3/A 2.31 A1/A+ A+ 3.61 3.21 2,000,000.00 100.60 2,011,900.00 0.99% Aa2/A+ 3.96 1,000,000.00 03/19/2026 1,006,290.00 A1/A A+ 2,000,000.00 A3/A NA 1,000,000.00 NA 03/13/2031 1,000,000.00 A1/AA 0.60% NA Total Corporate 42,300,000.00 4.03% 42,354,131.55 42,354,190.43 99.92 4.49% 42,256,952.83 474,877.75 20.74% (97,237.60) 2.80 2.32 FUND 1.00 0.00 0.00 NA/NA NA 0.00 0.00 Total Money Market Fund 10,431,400.02 3.27% 10,431,400.02 10,431,400.02 1.00 3.27% 10,431,400.02 0.00 5.12% 0.00 0.00 0.00 SUPRANATIONAL 1,000,000.00 3.91% Aaa/AAA NA 0.63 0.60 2,000,000.00 Aaa/AAA NA 2.11 1.99
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 HOLDINGS REPORT Cusip Par Value/ Units Purchase Date Purchase Yield Cost Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss S&P/ Fitch Maturity Total 3,000,000.00 3.95% 2,980,010.00 2,984,160.41 99.37 4.00% 2,981,049.00 43,555.56 1.46% (3,111.41) 1.61 1.52 US TREASURY 06/11/2026 03/31/2026 99.90 0.00 F1+ 0.03 0.03 3,000,000.00 100.13 3,126.33 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 0.63 0.60 100.21 1.33% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 100.03 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 1,000,000.00 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 0.91 1,000,000.00 3.90% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 0.99 3,000,000.00 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 1.21 1.16 2,000,000.00 99.36 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 1.36 100.20 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 100.39 12,063.19 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 1.63 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 1,000,000.00 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 1,200,000.00 99.26 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 2.00 1.91 3.90% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 1.91 3,000,000.00 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 2.12 1.99 3,000,000.00 33,169.16 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 2.10
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 HOLDINGS REPORT Cusip Par Value/ Units Purchase Date Purchase Yield Cost Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss S&P/ Fitch Maturity 3,000,000.00 3.63% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 2.29 2.16 2,000,000.00 101.32 0.99% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 2.33 3,000,000.00 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 3.63% 1.09% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 2.36 01/31/2029 3,000,000.00 3.91% 2,996,016.00 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 03/31/2029 3,000,000.00 20,963.11 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 2.63 3,000,000.00 3.90% 101.22 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 3.00 3,000,000.00 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 2.91 11/30/2029 3,000,000.00 100.13 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 3.23 01/31/2030 3,000,000.00 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 3.32 3,000,000.00 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 3.91 3.60 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 06/30/2030 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 99.09 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 09/30/2030 Aa1/AA+ AA+ 11/30/2030 3.90% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 01/31/2031 106,961.33 3.90% Aa1/AA+ AA+ 03/31/2031 Aa1/AA+ AA+
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 HOLDINGS REPORT Cusip Par Value/ Units Purchase Date Purchase Yield Cost Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss S&P/ Fitch Maturity Total US Treasury 100,405,000.00 3.83% 100,567,476.63 100,510,895.64 99.37 4.05% 99,761,033.99 829,736.43 48.96% (749,861.65) 3.18 2.91 205,019,061.83 3.54% 204,994,579.77 205,017,241.96 94.11 4.11% 203,755,883.91 1,537,474.42 100.00% (1,261,358.05) 2.57 2.19 Total Market Value + Accrued 205,293,358.33
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 TRANSACTION LEDGER Date CUSIP Price Acq/ Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/ Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase 3.02% 0.00 0.00 Purchase 03/20/2029 0.00 0.00 Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase 110,266.06 Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase 0.00 0.00 Purchase 0.00 0.00 Purchase 0.00 0.00 Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 TRANSACTION LEDGER Date CUSIP Price Acq/ Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/ Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss Purchase 2,000,000.00 0.00 Purchase Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Purchase 11/30/2030 0.00 Total Purchase 28,086,527.81 (27,909,280.20) (47,130.23) (27,956,410.43) 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 28,086,527.81 (27,909,280.20) (47,130.23) (27,956,410.43) 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Sale 1.03% Sale Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Sale 3130AP2P9 09/30/2026 1.03% Sale Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Sale 1.09% Sale Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Sale Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Sale Management 1.000 0.00 0.00 Total Sale (17,815,951.33) 17,736,391.33 (16,451.66) 17,752,842.99 (78,097.79)
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 TRANSACTION LEDGER Date CUSIP Price Acq/ Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/ Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss TOTAL DISPOSITIONS (17,815,951.33) 17,736,391.33 (16,451.66) 17,752,842.99 (78,097.79) OTHER TRANSACTIONS Cash 0.00% 0.00 0.00 10,000,000.00 Cash 0.00% 10,000,000.00 0.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 Total Cash Transfer 10,000,452.75 10,000,452.75 0.00 10,000,452.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,916.33 0.00 3,916.33 0.00 0.00 16,000.00 0.00 16,000.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 TRANSACTION LEDGER Date CUSIP Price Acq/ Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/ Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss 0.00 12/16/2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10/21/2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/22/2029 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.91% 0.00 0.00 0.00 09/23/2030 3.03% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,960.00 0.00 11,960.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 TRANSACTION LEDGER Date CUSIP Price Acq/ Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/ Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss 0.00 3.90% 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/30/2030 3.90% 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/30/2029 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Coupon 0.00 642,402.63 0.00 642,402.63 0.00 06/02/2026 0.00 Management 0.00 0.00 Total Dividend 0.00 10,911.81 0.00 10,911.81 0.00 TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 10,000,452.75 10,653,767.19 0.00 10,653,767.19 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income CASH & EQUIVALENTS 06/11/2026 03/31/2026 03/31/2026 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Management 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Cash & Equivalents 11,644,061.83 1,115,167.57 18,891,527.81 (8,815,951.33) 11,643,301.33 0.00 2,462.06 0.00 2,462.06 2,357.54 0.00 2,357.54 4,819.60 4,819.60 FIXED INCOME 0.00 0.00 9,200.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,102.29 0.00 3,012.01 3,012.01 03/13/2031 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 0.00 0.00 21,362.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,331.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 129.21 129.21 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 2,933.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02/26/2029 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 0.00 0.00 0.00 03/19/2026 03/20/2026 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.29 0.00 63.29 0.00 2,999,969.61 0.00 0.00 9,690.00 0.00 0.00 3130AP2P9 0.92 09/30/2026 09/30/2021 09/30/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 996.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/09/2021 12/09/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/09/2021 12/09/2021 0.00 0.00 11,960.00 1,993.33 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 3130APVC6 12/09/2021 12/09/2021 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/30/2021 12/30/2021 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/30/2021 12/30/2021 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/22/2021 12/22/2021 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,999,333.06 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,200.00 0.00 0.00 03/26/2026 03/31/2026 0.00 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03/06/2026 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/22/2029 02/03/2026 02/12/2026 0.00 0.00 3.96 0.00 3.96 03/20/2029 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.19 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09/23/2030 02/10/2026 930,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/12/2026 01/21/2026 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02/10/2026 1,239,919.60 0.00 0.00 1,239,921.02 3,916.33 3,916.33 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,003,320.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N.A. 1.1 06/22/2026 06/22/2021 06/22/2021 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03/10/2026 0.00 0.00 2.22 0.00 2.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.92 0.00 66.92 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,260,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/13/2026 01/21/2026 0.00 0.00 2.26 0.00 2.26 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,613.19 2,613.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 01/31/2029 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 16,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,010.32 0.00 1,010.32 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,012.10 2,012.10 03/19/2026 03/20/2026 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03/06/2026 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/03/2029 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 0.00 0.00 3,969.00 0.00 0.00 10/21/2030 03/12/2026 03/20/2026 690,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,100.00 0.00 0.00 01/13/2026 01/21/2026 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/16/2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 02/01/2029 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,169.16 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/31/2029 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/31/2031 0.00 0.00 0.00 106,961.33 26,699.90 26,699.90 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,963.11 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,320.31 3,320.31 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,063.19 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 999,026.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 101.90 0.00 0.00 3,366.21 3,366.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 12,931.39 0.00 611.63 0.00 611.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of May 31, 2026 INCOME EARNED Cusip Trade Date Units Prior Accrued Inc. Received Ending Accrued Total Interest Accr. Of Discount Amort. Of Premium Net Accret/Amort Income Earned Total Income 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 190.22 0.00 0.00 11/30/2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,222.22 10,000.00 0.00 Total Fixed Income 193,375,000.00 193,359,713.66 9,017,752.39 (8,998,537.79) 193,373,940.63 1,581,953.77 169,974.06 1,537,474.42 125,494.71 14,585.11 (19,572.75) (4,987.64) 120,507.07 120,507.07 TOTAL PORTFOLIO 205,019,061.83 194,474,881.23 27,909,280.20 (17,814,489.12) 205,017,241.96 1,581,953.77 172,436.12 1,537,474.42 127,956.77 16,942.65 (19,572.75) (2,630.10) 125,326.67 125,326.67
Item #7
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
July 21, 2026
Public Works - Utilities Division
TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS,
OR DESIGNEE, TO APPLY FOR AND EXECUTE DOCUMENTS RELATED TO
CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD FUNDING AND
FINANCIAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE GROUNDWATER SUPPLY PROJECT
SUMMARY
The City is pursuing funding and financing opportunities through the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for the City’s Groundwater Supply Project. The proposed resolution authorizes the Director of Public Works, or his or her designee, to submit financing applications, execute related agreements and certifications, and take other actions necessary to secure financing and funding opportunities for the project.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution authorizing the Director of Public Works, or his or her designee, to apply for and execute documents related to SWRCB funding opportunities for the Groundwater Supply Project.
BACKGROUND
The City has historically met its water demands through a combination of treated water purchases from Zone 7 Water Agency (Zone 7) and use of its local groundwater production quota (GPQ) of 3,500 acre-feet per year through City-owned Wells 5, 6, and 8, which supplied approximately 20 to 30 percent of the City’s annual water demand.
In June 2019, Well 8 was taken out of service after PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) were detected above advisory levels. In November 2022, Wells 5 and 6 were taken out of service after PFAS was detected at levels above the revised advisory levels. As a result, the City lost the ability to utilize its GPQ and was required to purchase 100 percent of its water supply from Zone 7. This led to higher water supply costs, reduced diversification of local water supplies, and concerns about long-term reliability, particularly during drought conditions.
To address these concerns, the City conducted a Water Supply Alternatives Study to assess multiple strategies, including rehabilitating the City’s existing wells with PFAS treatment, developing new groundwater wells, and continuing to rely entirely on purchased water from Zone 7. In October 2023, the City Council approved the study's recommendation to pursue development of new groundwater wells in the Bernal groundwater subbasin through establishment of the City Groundwater Supply Project, CIP No. 24174. Additional engineering studies completed with Zone 7 found that developing the wells in partnership would be beneficial to both agencies.
In April 2026, the City Council approved the implementation of the City Groundwater Supply project. Groundwater supply improvements would be implemented in partnership with Zone 7
and would include the development of two new groundwater production wells at Tennis and Community Park and Hansen Park, a new transmission pipeline connecting the wells to the Zone 7 Hopyard Chloramination Facility, and upgrades to the Zone 7 Hopyard Chloramination Facility. Zone 7 would deliver the City’s GPQ to the City’s distribution system via its existing transmission system and turnouts. In order to receive the groundwater from Zone 7, improvements to the City’s distribution system would also be required, including pipe upsizing and construction of a new turnout. Improvements to the City’s distribution systems would be the sole responsibility of the City.
The cost of the Groundwater Supply Project, including the City's share of the groundwater supply improvements to be jointly constructed with Zone 7 and the City’s distribution improvements, is currently estimated at approximately $27.5 million, in 2026 dollars. The City seeks to actively pursue state and federal funding opportunities to offset project costs, leverage outside resources, and reduce financial impacts on ratepayers.
Staff has initiated the preliminary application process with the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to pursue available funding and financing opportunities for the project, including the Emerging Contaminants Program, which may provide principal forgiveness and other financial assistance for projects that address PFAS impacts to drinking water supplies.
DISCUSSION
Staff have initiated an application with the SWRCB for State Revolving Fund financing opportunities and inclusion on the State’s Intended Use Plan. The general application requires a City Council resolution authorizing a City representative to sign and file documents on behalf of the City. Because the Public Works Department oversees the City’s water system, the proposed resolution designates the Director of Public Works, or his or her designee, to apply for and execute documents related to SWRCB funding opportunities for the City’s Groundwater Supply Project.
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
The project supports the City's goal of providing safe, reliable drinking water while enhancing long-term water supply reliability, improving local water resiliency, and reducing dependence on imported water supplies.
OUTREACH
Not applicable, as this item is a routine matter of City business.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Approval of this action advances the citywide ONE Pleasanton Strategic Plan goal of Investing in Our Environment, Strategy 3 – Identify funding and implement the recommendations from the Water Supply Alternative Study to resolve PFAS-related water quality issues
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this item will authorize the City to pursue SWRCB funding and financing opportunities for the City’s Groundwater Supply Project, which is currently estimated to cost approximately $27.5 million. Approval of this resolution does not obligate the City to accept any funding or financing, authorize construction of the project, or commit City funds. Additional City
Council actions may be required before acceptance of funding, execution of financing agreements, and implementation of the project.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Siew-Chin Yeong, Director
of Public Works
Siew-Chin Yeong, Director of Public
Works
Joe Calabrigo, Interim
City Manager
Attachments:
1. Resolution for Groundwater Supply Project
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 26-X
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON
APPROVING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OR DESIGNEE TO APPLY FOR
CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD FUNDS FOR THE
GROUNDWATER SUPPLY PROJECT
WHEREAS, historically, the City’s groundwater production quota of 3,500 acre-feet per year has supplied 20 to 30 percent of the City of Pleasanton’s annual water demand; and WHEREAS, in 2019 and 2022, the City’s groundwater wells were placed out of service after per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were detected above advisory levels; and WHEREAS, in October 2023, the City completed the Water Supply Alternatives Study that assessed multiple strategies to regain the use of City’s groundwater production quota and recommended to pursue development of new groundwater wells in the Bernal groundwater subbasin through establishment of the Groundwater Supply Project; and WHEREAS, in April 2026, the City Council approved moving forward with the implementation of the Groundwater Supply Project in partnership with Zone 7; and WHEREAS, the Groundwater Supply Project will also require improvements to the City’s water distribution system that are the sole responsibility of the City; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost of the Groundwater Supply Project, including the City’s share of the groundwater supply improvements to be jointly constructed with Zone 7 and the City’s sole cost for distribution improvements, is estimated at approximately $27.5 million in 2026 dollars; and
WHEREAS, the City desires and intends to apply for financing and/or financial assistance related to the Groundwater Supply Project from the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING:
SECTION 1. The Director of Public Works (the “Authorized Representative”) or designee is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of the Entity, a Financial Assistance Application for a financing agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board for the planning, design, and construction of the Groundwater Supply Project.
SECTION 2. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide for assurance, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water Resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.
SECTION 3. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the City in carrying out the City's responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on July 21, 2026.
I, Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of June 2026 by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
Item #8
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
July 21, 2026
Public Works - Engineering Division
TITLE: APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AUTHORIZE THE CITY
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH WESTSIDE LANDSCAPE AND CONCRETE, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $429,845 WITH A 10 PERCENT CONTINGENCY OF $43,000 FOR THE NONFUNCTIONAL TURF CONVERSION FOR AB 1572 PROJECT, CIP NO. 26787, AND APPROVE A
BUDGET AMENDMENT TO THE PARKS CIP GENERAL FUND
SUMMARY
The Nonfunctional Turf Conversion project was developed in response to the State of California’s Assembly Bill 1572 (AB1572), which mandates the removal of non-functional turf from non-residential properties. The compliance deadline for City properties is January 1, 2027. This project will bring the City into compliance.
A competitive bidding process was conducted for the project in accordance with the City’s Procurement and Contracting procedures. Eight bids were received on June 24, 2026. Staff recommends the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a construction contract with Westside Landscape and Concrete, Inc. (Westside), the lowest responsive bidder, in the amount of $429,845.00 for the base bid amount. Staff also recommends authorizing a construction contingency of $43,000, or approximately 10 percent, for related work, for a total authorized construction budget of $472,845. Construction is anticipated to begin in September and be completed by the end of 2026.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve plans and specifications for the Nonfunctional Turf Conversion for AB 1572 Project, CIP No. 26787;
2. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a construction contract with Westside for the low bid amount of $429,845;
3. Authorize the Director of Public Works, or authorized staff, to approve and execute contract change orders from a project contingency not-to-exceed $43,000 or approximately 10 percent of the contract amount; and
4. Approve a budget amendment returning $497,224 of the remaining project funding to the fund balance in the Parks CIP General Fund (Fund 221) for future eligible projects.
BACKGROUND
The City of Pleasanton has actively worked to reduce water use since the early 2000s, beginning with the conversion of a portion of the City’s potable water infrastructure to recycled water. These proactive efforts placed the City in a strong position to more easily respond to Assembly Bill 1572, a State of California mandate enacted in October 2023 that prohibits the use of potable water to irrigate turf that does not serve a functional purpose on non-residential
properties. The bill requires the removal of non-functional turf from all government properties by January 1, 2027.
In 2024, the City conducted a citywide study to identify turf areas on City properties that do not serve a functional purpose. The study included both underutilized recreational turf and nonfunctional or ‘aesthetic’ turf. Staff used the study findings to develop bid documents for the replacement of identified non-functional turf.
DISCUSSION
The bid opening for the Nonfunctional Turf Conversion for AB1572 project, CIP No. 26787, was held on June 24, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. Eight base bids, ranging from $429,845 to $982,000, were received (Attachment 2). The lowest base bid, submitted by Westside in the amount of $429,845, is approximately 48 percent of the Engineer’s Estimate of $889,000. Although Westside’s total for the bid alternates was $397,382.50, approximately 43 percent of the Engineer’s Estimate of $936,707, staff does not recommend approval of the bid alternate work, considering the City's current budget situation. Staff reviewed the bids, found the low bid to be responsive, and recommends awarding the construction contract to Westside in the amount of $429,845.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
A Notice of Exemption (NOE) was filed for the turf reduction implementation under Categorical Exemption Class 2, replacement or reconstruction.
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Approval of this action advances the Climate Action Plan (CAP 2.0) in Water Use by decreasing water use and demand, and Natural Systems by fostering resilient landscapes that improve habitats, ecosystems, and public health.
OUTREACH
No outreach was conducted, as this item is a routine matter of City business.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Approval of this action advances the citywide ONE Pleasanton Strategic Plan goal of Investing in Our Environment, Strategy 1 – Implement the four-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to complete design and construction of budgeted capital projects, and Strategy 7 – Continue to invest in parks, bicycle, and pedestrian infrastructure, and public art to improve traffic safety, promote climate resilience, and increase equitable access to cultural and recreational opportunities.
FISCAL IMPACT
The total allocated budget of $1,100,000 for the Nonfunctional Turf Conversion for AB1572 Project, CIP No. 26787, includes funding from Park CIP General Fund (Fund 221) in the amount of $850,000 and from Park Development Impact Fees (Fund 222) in the total amount of $250,000. Referring to Attachment 3, expenditures to date for this project total $67,566, including consultant costs. Anticipated expenditures in the amount of $535,211 for the construction contract, construction support, contingencies, and landscape improvements by Public Works staff, leave a project balance of $497,224 to return to the Parks CIP General
Fund (Fund 221) for future eligible projects.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Michael Stella, City
Engineer
Siew-Chin Yeong, Director of Public
Works
Joe Calabrigo, Interim
City Manager
Attachments:
1. Project Location Map
2. Bid Comparison Matrix
3. Financial Expenditure Summary
Fire Station No. 2
Nielsen Park
Bicentennial Park
Orloff Park
Amador Valley
Community Park
Fire Station No. 1
Kottinger
Community Park
Centennial Park
Pleasanton Police Station
Civic
Center
NONFUNCTIONAL TURF CONVERSION FOR AB1572
CIP NO. 26787
Attachment 1
1 Amador Valley Community Park 1 LS $20,840.00 $20,840.00 $13,090.00 $13,090.00 $31,350.00 $31,350.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 2 Bicentennial Park 1 LS $24,268.00 $24,268.00 $6,582.00 $6,582.00 $26,450.25 $26,450.25 $17,000.00 $17,000.003 Centennial Park 1 LS $348,021.00 $348,021.00 $168,702.00 $168,702.00 $132,850.00 $132,850.00 $292,000.00 $292,000.004 Civic Center 1 LS $47,570.00 $47,570.00 $24,084.00 $24,084.00 $27,350.00 $27,350.00 $47,000.00 $47,000.005 Pleasanton Police Department 1 LS $70,178.00 $70,178.00 $35,832.00 $35,832.00 $55,950.50 $55,950.50 $59,000.00 $59,000.006 Fire Station No. 11 LS $37,483.00 $37,483.00 $19,055.00 $19,055.00 $38,550.00 $38,550.00 $32,000.00 $32,000.007 Fire Station No. 21 LS $39,315.00 $39,315.00 $20,660.00 $20,660.00 $25,750.00 $25,750.00 $32,000.00 $32,000.008 Kottinger Community Park 1 LS $109,854.00 $109,854.00 $52,400.00 $52,400.00 $88,350.00 $88,350.00 $72,000.00 $72,000.009 Nielsen Park 1 LS $90,802.00 $90,802.00 $40,068.00 $40,068.00 $88,350.00 $88,350.00 $77,000.00 $77,000.00 10 Orloff Park 1 LS $100,540.00 $100,540.00 $49,372.00 $49,372.00 $82,550.00 $82,550.00 $130,000.00 $130,000.00 Bid Alternates
B‐1 Centennial Park 1 LS $135,782.00 $135,782.00 $55,363.50 $55,363.50 $52,550.00 $52,550.00 $195,000.00 $195,000.00 B‐2 Fairlands Park 1 LS $224,044.00 $224,044.00 $75,456.00 $75,456.00 $82,000.00 $82,000.00 $291,000.00 $291,000.00B‐3 Harvest Park 1 LS $26,808.00 $26,808.00 $12,207.00 $12,207.00 $29,350.00 $29,350.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00B‐4 Medowlark Park 1 LS $115,848.00 $115,848.00 $52,881.00 $52,881.00 $36,000.00 $36,000.00 $133,000.00 $133,000.00 B‐5 Mission Hills Park 1 LS $119,290.00 $119,290.00 $103,125.00 $103,125.00 $39,850.00 $39,850.00 $176,000.00 $176,000.00 B‐6 Oak Hill Park 1 LS $89,108.00 $89,108.00 $31,284.00 $31,284.00 $32,150.00 $32,150.00 $89,000.00 $89,000.00 B‐7 Tawny Park 1 LS $117,399.00 $117,399.00 $32,896.00 $32,896.00 $35,350.00 $35,350.00 $122,000.00 $122,000.00 B‐8 Valley Trails Park 1 LS $108,428.00 $108,428.00 $34,170.00 $34,170.00 $42,000.00 $42,000.00 $138,000.00 $138,000.00 Citywide Turf Reduction Implementation, CIP No. 26787
Bid Comparison Matrix
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT
CLS
SUBTOTAL
Total Base Bid + Bid Alternatives
$597,500.75
$349,250.00 $1,166,000.00
$1,825,578.00 $827,227.50 $946,750.75 $1,948,000.00
Marina
Total Bid Alternatives $936,707.00 $397,382.50
UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL
$429,845.00 $782,000.00
UNIT PRICE
Total Base Bid $888,871.00
UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL
Engineers Estimate Westside
ITEM NO. UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL
Attachment 2
$11,000.00 $11,000.00 $15,104.00 $15,104.00 $32,845.14 $32,845.14 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $34,987.00 $34,987.00 $34,576.33 $34,576.33 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $385,000.00 $385,000.00 $393,692.00 $393,692.00 $292,228.74 $292,228.74 $361,000.00 $361,000.00 $280,000.00 $280,000.00 $23,000.00 $23,000.00 $35,851.00 $35,851.00 $57,742.87 $57,742.87 $58,000.00 $58,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00$38,000.00 $38,000.00 $75,014.00 $75,014.00 $116,777.89 $116,777.89 $95,000.00 $95,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00$27,000.00 $27,000.00 $42,680.00 $42,680.00 $63,431.81 $63,431.81 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $62,000.00 $62,000.00$14,000.00 $14,000.00 $34,804.00 $34,804.00 $55,160.55 $55,160.55 $47,000.00 $47,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00$96,000.00 $96,000.00 $114,956.00 $114,956.00 $96,898.95 $96,898.95 $92,000.00 $92,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00$64,000.00 $64,000.00 $82,613.00 $82,613.00 $78,791.50 $78,791.50 $104,000.00 $104,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $137,000.00 $137,000.00 $88,497.00 $88,497.00 $91,693.77 $91,693.77 $97,000.00 $97,000.00 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $144,000.00 $144,000.00 $85,616.00 $85,616.00 $175,623.06 $175,623.06 $160,000.00 $160,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00$165,000.00 $165,000.00 $237,682.00 $237,682.00 $264,166.54 $264,166.54 $293,000.00 $293,000.00 $270,000.00 $270,000.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $25,548.00 $25,548.00 $33,998.40 $33,998.40 $43,000.00 $43,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $167,563.00 $167,563.00 $102,812.56 $102,812.56 $130,000.00 $130,000.00 $130,000.00 $130,000.00$135,000.00 $135,000.00 $106,704.00 $106,704.00 $135,160.34 $135,160.34 $149,000.00 $149,000.00 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 $79,000.00 $79,000.00 $76,373.00 $76,373.00 $67,176.88 $67,176.88 $92,000.00 $92,000.00 $98,000.00 $98,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $98,060.00 $98,060.00 $109,627.10 $109,627.10 $122,000.00 $122,000.00 $120,000.00 $120,000.00 $96,000.00 $96,000.00 $109,185.00 $109,185.00 $105,327.04 $105,327.04 $113,000.00 $113,000.00 $140,000.00 $140,000.00
UNIT PRICE
QLM
$982,000.00
$832,000.00 $993,891.92 $906,731.00 $1,102,000.00
$1,657,000.00 $1,824,929.00 $1,914,039.47 $2,044,000.00 $2,165,000.00 Landscape Pros
UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL
$942,000.00
Bay Construction Los Loza
UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL
$825,000.00 $918,198.00
UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL
$1,183,000.00
Frontline
UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL
$920,147.55
ATTACHMENT 3
Project Funding to Date Amount Totals
2025-26 CIP Allocation (Fund 222 - Park Development Impact Fee) $150,000 2026-27 CIP Allocation (Fund 222 - Park Development Impact Fee) 100,000 2026-27 CIP Allocation (Fund 221 - Park CIP - General Fund) 850,000
TOTAL FUNDING TO DATE
Project Expenditures to Date
Advertising $210
Landscape Architectural Services (Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc., On-Call Contractor, Contract No. 2026177) 67,064 Plan production cost 292
Total Project Expenditures to Date $67,566
Anticipated Project Expenditures
Westside Landscape and Concrete, Inc. - Construction Contract $827,228 Project Contingency (Approximately 10%) 83,000
Landscape Architectural Services (Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc., On-Call Contractor, Contract No. 2026177) 12,366 Additional landscape improvements by Parks 50,000
Total Anticipated Project Expenditures $972,593
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Funding Balance/ (Shortfall)
Current Balance 59,841
$1,040,159
$1,100,000
NONFUNCTIONAL TURF CONVERSION FOR AB1572
CIP NO. 26787
07/21/26
Item #9
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
July 21, 2026
Public Works - Utilities Division
TITLE: AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH WEST
YOST FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA
ACQUISITION (SCADA) STANDARDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $349,693
SUMMARY
The City uses its Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system to monitor and control critical water, recycled water, sewer, and storm drainage infrastructure in real time. The proposed agreement with West Yost would implement a key recommendation from the City’s 2024 SCADA Management Plan to develop formal SCADA standards that promote consistency, security, and reliability across the system.
The agreement would also provide planning-level technical support to the City’s Information Technology (IT) Department to advance recommended near-term system resilience projects, including relocation of the backup core SCADA server, improvements to remote access, and operational technology (OT) system monitoring. West Yost is familiar with the City's existing SCADA system based on its prior work on the City’s SCADA Management Plan, and the sensitive nature of the operational technology and cybersecurity issues involved warrants continuity in consultant services.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with West Yost for the development of SCADA standards in an amount not to exceed $349,693.
BACKGROUND
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems are used to monitor and control critical infrastructure processes. The City uses its SCADA system to monitor and control its water, recycled water, sewer, and storm drainage systems, including pump stations, storage tanks, and other remote facilities. SCADA provides operators with real-time system data, alarms, and remote operational control, supporting reliable service delivery, timely response to system issues, and more efficient day-to-day operation of the City’s utility systems.
In 2024, West Yost prepared a SCADA Management Plan for the City that established a baseline assessment of the existing SCADA system, identified key gaps and vulnerabilities, recommended improvements, and outlined a phased implementation plan. The first project recommended in the management plan is the development of formal SCADA standards to provide consistency across the City’s system. The management plan also recommended nearterm projects critical to improving system resilience, including relocation of the backup core SCADA server, improvements to remote access, and implementation of OT system monitoring.
This agreement with West Yost would assist the City in implementing these recommendations.
DISCUSSION
The agreement with West Yost includes the following tasks:
• AWIA Cybersecurity Assessment Crosswalk and Gap Analysis: This task will evaluate cybersecurity findings from the City’s 2025 America’s Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) Cyber Risk and Resilience Assessment and 2024 SCADA Management Plan. This effort will identify gaps and establish an updated cybersecurity baseline to inform and prioritize the subsequent development of standards.
• SCADA Standards Development: This task will develop formal SCADA standards addressing instrumentation, hardware, programming, tagging, and database conventions, graphics, alarm management, reporting, and version control. • Basis of Design for Near-Term System Resilience Projects: This task will investigate and define the scope, level of effort, and planning-level cost required to implement the near-term system resilience projects. This task will not include actual execution of the projects by West Yost; rather, it will establish the technical framework, design criteria, and budgetary estimates for subsequent execution by the City.
The agreement with West Yost includes a $55,000 allowance for additional services related to the tasks described above, upon written authorization from the City’s project manager.
Staff has determined that West Yost is the only firm capable of performing this work without introducing unacceptable operational and security risks. As the author of the City’s SCADA Master Plan and related system assessments, West Yost possesses exclusive institutional knowledge of the City’s specific SCADA architecture and control logic. Because this scope involves highly sensitive operational technology and critical utility control systems, engaging a firm unfamiliar with the City’s proprietary configurations would necessitate a redundant, highrisk period of reverse engineering and vulnerability assessment.
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Implementation of the SCADA standards project supports long-term protection of community water resources. The project contributes to improved water quality, enhanced system reliability, and increased resilience.
OUTREACH
Not applicable, as this item is a routine matter of City business.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Not applicable, as this item is a routine matter of City business.
FISCAL IMPACT
This project is funded and has been budgeted for FY by the Water Enterprise Operating Fund – Professional Services (42040602-430101).
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Siew-Chin Yeong, Director
of Public Works
Siew-Chin Yeong, Director of Public
Works
Joe Calabrigo, Interim
City Manager
Attachments:
1. Professional Services Agreement with West Yost
Attachment 1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into this ____ day of June 2026, between the CITY OF PLEASANTON, a municipal corporation (“City”), and West Yost Associates, a corporation, whose address is 2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100, Davis, CA 95618, and telephone number is 530-756-5905, (“Consultant”).
RECITALS
A. Consultant is qualified to and experienced in providing professional services to support the City in establishing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) standards as specified in this Agreement.
B. City finds it necessary and advisable to use the services of the Consultant for the purposes provided in this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions in this Agreement, City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. Consultant’s Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A. Consultant shall provide said services at that time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.
2. City Assistance, Facilities, Equipment and Clerical Support. Except as set forth in Exhibit A, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment that may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall furnish to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed in Exhibit A according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A.
3. Term. This contract shall commence on the date written above and shall expire on December 31, 2027.
4. Compensation. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement on a time and materials basis as described more particularly in Exhibit A. The payments shall be made on a monthly basis upon receipt and approval of Consultant’s invoice. Total compensation for services and reimbursement for costs shall not exceed $349,693. a. Invoices submitted to City must contain a brief description of work performed, time used and City reference number. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant’s invoice and approved by City.
b. Upon completion of work and acceptance by City, Consultant shall have sixty (60) days in which to submit final invoicing for payment. An extension may be granted by City upon receiving a written request thirty (30) days in advance of said time limitation. The City shall have no obligation or liability to pay any invoice for work performed which the Consultant fails or neglects to submit within sixty (60) days, or any extension thereof granted by the City, after the work is accepted by the City.
5. Sufficiency of Consultant’s Work. All work product and all other documents prepared by Consultant shall be adequate and sufficient to meet the purposes for which they are prepared. In providing services under this Agreement, the Consultant shall perform in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same or similar locality (“Standard of Care”).
6. Ownership of Work. All work product and all other documents completed or partially completed by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall become the property of the City, provided that the City substantially performs its obligations under this Agreement, including prompt payment of all sums due and owing to Consultant. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Consultant shall replace them at its own expense. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Consultant agrees to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. Consultant shall keep materials confidential.
Materials shall not be used for purposes other than performance of services under this Agreement and shall not be disclosed to anyone not connected with these services, unless the City provides prior written consent. Client shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.
7. Changes. City may request changes in the scope of services to be provided by Consultant.
Any changes and related fees shall be mutually agreed upon between the parties and subject to a written amendment to this Agreement.
8. Consultant’s Status. In performing the obligations set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall have the status of an independent contractor and Consultant shall not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or under the direction of Consultant are its agents and employees and are not agents or employees of City.
9. Termination for Convenience of City. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Consultant. The Agreement shall then be deemed terminated, and no further work shall be performed by Consultant. If the Agreement is so terminated, the Consultant shall be paid for that percentage of the work actually completed at the time the notice of termination is received.
10. Non-Assignability. The Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any interest or obligation in the Agreement without the prior written consent of the City, and then only upon such terms and conditions as City may set forth in writing. Consultant shall be solely responsible for reimbursing subcontractors.
11. Indemnity and Hold Harmless. Consultant shall indemnify, and hold harmless, the City and its officers, and employees from and against all claims, losses, damage, injury, and liability for damages to the extent caused by the negligent errors, omissions, or wrongful acts of the Consultant in the performance of its services under this Agreement, regardless of whether the City has reviewed or approved the work or services which has given rise to the claim, loss, damage, injury or liability for damages. This indemnification shall extend for a reasonable
period of time after completion of the project as well as during the period of actual performance of services under this Agreement. The City’s acceptance of the insurance certificates required under this Agreement does not relieve the Consultant from its obligation under this paragraph.
Consultant shall only be required to reimburse City for defense fees and costs (including reasonable attorney's fees), in proportion to Consultant’s proven acts of negligence and further, only to the extent such fees and costs were directly attributable to the City’s defense of a suit based on Consultant’s proven negligence. The Parties also acknowledge that this Agreement is subject to California Civil Code 2782.8 as amended and effective January 1, 2018.
12. Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect, at its own cost and expense, insurance coverages with insurers with an A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII. Contractor shall have the obligation to furnish City, as additional insured, the minimum coverages identified below, or such greater or broader coverage for City, if available in the Contractor’s policies:
a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CG 00 01 or carrier equivalent, with limits of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate, and $2,000,000 products and completed operations aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. The policy shall include a per project or per location general aggregate endorsement. If a per project/location endorsement is not available, the limit for the general aggregate shall be doubled. The policy shall provide that the City, its officials, officers, employees, designated agents, and volunteers are named as additional insureds using ISO form CG 20 10 (or carrier equivalent) for ongoing operations, and, for construction or service agreements, ISO form CG 20 37 (or carrier equivalent) for completed operations and satisfactory to the City Attorney. The policy shall allow and be endorsed primary insurance for work performed by Consultant and its subconsultants, and that no other insurance or self-insurance effected by City or other additional insured will be contribute to or be called on to cover a loss.
b. Automobile Liability Insurance. Automobile liability insurance coverage for owned, nonowned, and hired autos using ISO Business Automobile Coverage form CA 00 01 (or equivalent) with limits not less than $2,000,000 each accident. If the Consultant’s business/company does not own any automobiles, coverage for hired and non-owned autos shall be provided. The policy shall provide and be endorsed that the City, its officials, officers, employees, designated agents, and volunteers are included or named as additional insureds. The policy shall provide and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. c. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance. Statutory Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be provided for all persons employed directly or indirectly by Contractor. The Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of not less than $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 by disease-policy limit, and $1,000,000 by disease-each employee. The coverage shall provide and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, designated agents, and volunteers. The requirement to maintain Statutory Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance may be waived by the City upon written verification that Contractor does not have any employees.
d. Professional Liability Insurance. Professional liability insurance that insures against professional errors and omissions that may be made in performing professional services in the amount of $2,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of the start of work, and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the work.
e. Certificate of Insurance and Endorsements. Consultant shall file a certificate of insurance and all required endorsements with the City prior to the City’s execution of this Agreement, and prior to engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Agreement.
The Certificate of Insurance shall provide in writing that the insurance afforded by this Certificate shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits without providing notice to the City in accordance with California Insurance Code section 677.2 which requires the notice of cancellation to: 1) include the effective date of the cancellation; 2) include the reasons for the cancellation; and 3) be given at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the cancellation, except that in the case of cancellation for nonpayment of premiums or for fraud, the notice shall be given no less than 10 days prior to the effective date of the cancellation. Notice shall be sent by mail. In addition, the insured shall provide thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City of any policy cancellation, suspension, reduction of coverage or in limits, or voiding of the insurance coverage required by this agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete certified copies of policies.
f. Defense Costs. General Liability coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf of” basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusions. These provisions do not apply to Professional Liability. g. Adequacy of Coverage. City reserves the right to modify these insurance requirements/coverages based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, or other special circumstances.
h. Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated in this Agreement, including but not limited naming additional insureds.
13. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
To Consultant: Daniel Groves To City: City Manager
West Yost Associates City of Pleasanton
2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100 P.O. Box 520
Davis, CA 95618 Pleasanton, CA 94566
14. Conformance to Applicable Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Municipal laws, rules, and ordinances in a manner consistent with the Standard of Care. Consultant shall not discriminate in the employment of persons or in the provision of
services under this Agreement on the basis of any legally protected classification, including race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or religion of such person.
15. Licenses, Certifications and Permits. Prior to the City’s execution of this Agreement and prior to the Consultant’s engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain a City of Pleasanton business license, which must be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement. Consultant covenants that it has obtained all certificates, licenses, permits and the like required to perform the services under this Agreement.
16. Records and Audits. Consultant shall maintain all records regarding this Agreement and the services performed for a period of three years from the date that final payment is made. At any time during normal business hours, the records shall be made available to the City to inspect and audit.
17. Confidentiality. Consultant shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.
18. Conflicts of Interest. Consultant covenants that other than this Agreement, Consultant has no financial interest with any official, employee or other representative of the City. Consultant and its principals do not have any financial interest in real property, sources of income or investment that would be affected in any manner of degree by the performance of Consultant’s services under this Agreement. If such an interest arises, Consultant will immediately notify the City.
19. Campaign Contribution Disclosure. Consultant has complied with the campaign contribution disclosure provisions of the California Levine Act (Govt. Code § 84308) and has completed the Levine Act Disclosure Statement attached hereto as Exhibit B.
20. Waiver. In the event either City or Consultant at any time waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Agreement, whether of the same or of any other covenant, condition or obligation.
21. Governing Law. California law shall govern any legal action pursuant to this Agreement with venue in the applicable court or forum for Alameda County.
22. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Consultant.
23. Exhibits. All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference incorporated herein.
24. Counterparts and Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement. Counterparts may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including pdf or any electronic signature complying with U.S. federal E-Sign Act of 2000 (15 U.S. Code §7001 et seq.), California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Cal. Civil Code §1633.1 et seq.), or other applicable law) or other transmission method, and any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes.
25. Scope of Agreement. This writing constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties.
Any modification to the Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties.
THIS AGREEMENT executed the date and year first above written.
CITY OF PLEASANTON CONSULTANT
__________________________ By:
Joseph Calabrigo, Interim City Manager
ATTEST:
___________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk Its:
Approved as to form:
_____________________________ By: __________________________ Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney Signature
__________________________
Print name
Its: __________________________
Title
[If Consultant is a corporation, signatures must comply with California Corporations Code §313] Rev. 11/23
__________________________
Signature
__________________________
Print name
__________________________
Title
2020 Research Park Drive
Suite 100
Davis CA 95618
530.756.5905 phone
530.756.5991 fax
westyost.com
May 26, 2026 SENT VIA: EMAIL
Todd Yamello
Utilities Planning Manager
City of Pleasanton
P.O. Box 520
Pleasanton, CA 94566
SUBJECT: Proposal for Engineering Services for West Yost to Perform Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Standards Development
Dear Todd:
The purpose of this letter proposal is to provide the City of Pleasanton (City) with a proposed scope of services, budget, and schedule for the development of SCADA Standards.
In 2023, West Yost prepared a SCADA Management Plan (SCADA MP) for the City that established a baseline assessment of the existing SCADA system, identified key gaps and vulnerabilities, and outlined a phased SCADA Program Implementation Plan (Appendix E). A primary finding of that effort was the need for improved and standardized documentation governing instrumentation, SCADA hardware and software, control strategies, and cybersecurity practices. The SCADA MP also identified several foundational near-term projects critical to system resilience, including the relocation of the backup core SCADA server, improvements to remote access, and implementation of Operational Technology (OT) system monitoring.
This project will implement those recommendations by evaluating updated cybersecurity risks and gaps, developing formal SCADA and Instrumentation Standards, and preparing a structured project plan to guide consistent implementation. In addition to the standards development effort, this scope includes preparation of Bases of Design and planning-level cost estimates for the additional SCADA resilience projects to support future budgeting and execution. The objective is to provide the City with practical standards documentation and defined next-step project frameworks that promote consistency, reliability, and cybersecurity across the SCADA environment, regardless of the entity performing the work.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following is a list of the key tasks necessary to perform this proposed scope of services, each further described below:
• Task 1. Project Management
• Task 2. AWIA Cybersecurity Assessment Crosswalk and Gap Analysis • Task 3. SCADA Standards Development
Exhibit A
Todd Yamello
May 26, 2026
• Task 4. Backup Core SCADA Server Relocation Basis of Design and Cost Estimate • Task 5. Remote Access Improvements Basis of Design and Cost Estimate • Task 6. OT System Monitoring Implementation Basis of Design and Cost Estimate • Task 7. As-Needed Services
Task 1. Project Management
The objective of this task is to track work progress and expenditures by using proactive communications, quality assurance, and quality control (QA/QC) to keep the project on schedule and budget. Project Management activities include the following:
• Kickoff Meeting – West Yost will prepare and coordinate a kickoff meeting to initiate the project. This meeting will be conducted virtually through Microsoft Teams and will include review of the project approach, scope, and project schedule with key City leadership. • Progress Meetings – Progress meetings will be held monthly via Teams to review project status, including work completed during the latest reporting period, work anticipated to be completed during the next reporting period, identified problems/issues that could affect project budget/expenditures and/or schedule, outstanding issues to be resolved, and outstanding action items.
• Invoices and Progress Reports – Monthly invoices and progress reports will be provided. • Quality Control – Internal QA/QC will be performed for each of the project deliverables prior to final submission to the City and final project closeout activities. • Project Closeout – West Yost will conduct final project closeout activities, including final document delivery and final progress report.
Task 1 Assumptions
• Project update meetings will be held monthly with key project team members. These meetings will be virtual using Microsoft Teams.
• Key City staff will be available to attend meetings and workshops.
Task 1 Deliverables
• West Yost will provide kickoff meeting facilitation materials. • West Yost will provide monthly update meeting facilitation materials. • West Yost will provide monthly project status reports and invoices.
Task 2. AWIA Cybersecurity Assessment Crosswalk and Gap Analysis The objective of this task is to evaluate and reconcile cybersecurity findings from the City’s latest America’s Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) Cyber Risk and Resilience Assessment (Cyber-RRA) against the 2023 SCADA Management Plan and the 2020 AWIA assessment. This effort will identify addressed, outstanding, and newly identified gaps and establish an updated cybersecurity baseline to inform and prioritize subsequent standards development and planning efforts. Work activities under this task include:
• AWIA Assessment Review – West Yost will review the City’s latest AWIA Cyber-RRA results, including control status summaries, identified vulnerabilities, and recommended actions based on the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Cybersecurity Guidance and Assessment
Todd Yamello
May 26, 2026
Tool. West Yost will then compare findings to the 2020 AWIA cybersecurity assessment to identify progress made on previous controls, and persistent or unresolved gaps. • SCADA Management Plan Crosswalk – West Yost will perform a crosswalk between AWIA assessment findings and the cybersecurity-related gaps, recommendations, and projects identified in the SCADA Management Plan. This includes alignment with previously identified deficiencies such as access control, remote access security, monitoring, and policy development. • Prioritization and Planning Alignment – West Yost will evaluate the relative priority of identified gaps (e.g., AWIA Priority 1 and 2 controls) and map them to relevant standards development efforts and planned projects (e.g., P1-3 Remote Access, P1-4 OT Monitoring) to promote alignment with the broader SCADA program.
• Technical Memorandum Preparation – West Yost will prepare a concise technical memorandum summarizing the crosswalk results, key findings, and recommended focus areas for subsequent tasks in this scope.
Task 2 Assumptions
• The City will provide the latest AWIA Cyber-RRA results and documentation from the 2020 assessment.
• The SCADA Management Plan will be used as the baseline reference for previously identified cybersecurity gaps and recommendations.
• This task is limited to evaluation and planning alignment and does not include implementation of cybersecurity improvements.
Task 2 Deliverables
• Technical Memorandum summarizing crosswalk between AWIA assessments, status of previously identified gaps and newly identified cybersecurity gaps Task 3. SCADA Standards Development
The objective of this task is to review existing SCADA and control system documentation and develop formal Instrumentation and SCADA Standards to provide consistency and standardization across the City’s water, wastewater, storm drain, and recycled water systems. The standards will address instrumentation, SCADA hardware, PLC programming practices and standard objects, tagging conventions, graphical standards, alarm management, HMI database conventions, reporting, and version control. Work activities under this task include:
• As-Built Documentation Review – West Yost will review existing control strategies, panel drawings, I/O lists, PLC programs, and related documentation to identify gaps and inconsistencies. Limited site verification will be conducted as needed. • Instrumentation Standards Development – West Yost will develop formal Instrumentation Standards to provide consistency in the selection, procurement, installation, and maintenance of field instrumentation. This will include review of representative existing field instrumentation, coordination with City staff to establish preferred manufacturers and acceptable alternatives for commonly used instrumentation (analyzers, flowmeters, level
Todd Yamello
May 26, 2026
transmitters, pressure transmitters and switches, and VFDs), and development of installation and integration guidelines to facilitate compatibility with PLC and SCADA systems.
• SCADA Hardware Standards Development – West Yost will develop SCADA hardware standards that define City standards for PLCs, OITs, remote site network equipment, control panel components, and associated power and communication hardware. Standards will identify approved manufacturers, minimum technical requirements, cybersecurity features, and hardware lifecycle expectations, including refresh cycles. Control panel design standards will also be established, including panel sizing, layout, voltage segregation, labeling, and wire management requirements.
• PLC Programming Standards Development – West Yost will develop custom standard programming objects for the City. This process will include defining the overall function of each object and the parameters used within each. This also includes documenting how standard SCADA graphical objects are to be used with each object. Finally, this sub-task will entail documenting overall standard practices for developing PLC logic. • Tagging Standards Development – West Yost will work with the City to develop standard tag conventions based on the existing SCADA and PLC tags in use. This includes defining the various portions of a standard SCADA tag to facilitate a better understanding of associated plants, process areas, instrument types, equipment types, and loop numbers. • SCADA Graphical Standards Development – West Yost will document graphical standards based on the objects used within the existing City SCADA system. This includes capturing screenshots of major equipment and instrumentation used throughout the existing SCADA system and defining the various parameters and color schemes associated with each of those components.
• Alarming Philosophy and Management Standards Development – West Yost will work with the City to develop alarm standards based on existing SCADA and PLC alarms. This includes documenting alarm tags, alarm severities, alarm descriptions, graphical representation of alarms within the SCADA system (e.g., equipment alarms, transmitter alarms, alarm colors, alarm banners, alarm summary screens), and operator responses. • HMI Database Conventions Standards Development – West Yost will work with the City to document existing HMI database conventions. This includes the documentation of trend and alarm database conventions.
• Report Standards Development – West Yost will work with the City to develop report standards. This includes conducting workshops with the City to gather feedback on report templates and content.
• Version Control Standards Development – West Yost will work with the City to develop version control standards for SCADA and PLC applications. This includes recommended practices regarding managing and tracking changes, maintaining the integrity and reliability of applications, and reverting to previous versions if needed.
Todd Yamello
May 26, 2026
Task 3 Assumptions
• City will provide existing instrumentation asset inventories, record drawings, PLC backups, O&M manuals, and related documentation at the start of the task to support review and recommendations.
• SCADA Graphical Standards Development is limited to documenting existing AVEVA InTouch standards as currently used within the SCADA environment. Modifications and additions to graphical templates are not included.
• HMI Database Conventions Standards Development is limited to documenting existing database conventions as currently implemented.
• Control strategy development will focus on major facilities and representative remote sites; minor facilities may be documented at a higher level unless otherwise directed. • Field verification will be limited to targeted site visits (up to 16 hours) and will not include forensic validation of wiring or PLC logic.
• City staff will be available to participate in workshops and will provide applicable SCADA and PLC backup files prior to beginning the task.
Task 3 Deliverables
• West Yost will provide a Draft & Final SCADA Standards document that includes components as outlined above.
Task 4. Backup Core SCADA Server Relocation Basis of Design and Cost Estimate The objective of this task is to investigate and define the scope, level of effort, and planning-level cost required to implement Project P1-2 – Backup Core SCADA Server Relocation. This task will not include implementation of the relocation project, but will instead establish the technical framework, design criteria, and budgetary estimate necessary for future execution. Work activities under this task include:
• Core SCADA Server Relocation Basis of Design – West Yost will develop a Basis of Design for relocating the core SCADA server environment. Work will include reviewing existing server, virtualization, network, storage/backup, power, and room layout conditions based on available documentation and coordination with City IT and Utilities staff. West Yost will define relocation objectives and design criteria, including redundancy, cybersecurity, physical security, environmental controls, power resiliency, operational continuity, and potential backup server locations. West Yost will also develop a high-level implementation approach addressing sequencing, outages, testing, cutover, rollback, and coordination requirements to reduce operational risk during future implementation.
• Planning-Level Cost Estimate Development – West Yost will prepare a planning-level cost estimate consistent with an AACE Class 5 estimate. The estimate will include anticipated costs for hardware procurement, software licensing (if applicable), network modifications, electrical upgrades, environmental improvements, professional services, testing, commissioning, and contingency.
Todd Yamello
May 26, 2026
Task 4 Assumptions
• This task is limited to development of a Basis of Design and planning-level cost estimate and does not include final design, procurement, configuration, or implementation services. • The City will provide available network diagrams, server inventories, backup architecture documentation, and facility information necessary for evaluation. • The cost estimate will be developed at a planning level and is intended for budgeting purposes only. • West Yost’s role will be advisory only and will not include server migration, system configuration, procurement, construction, installation, or implementation of the relocation project.
Task 4 Deliverables
• Basis of Design memorandum for P1-2 Backup Core SCADA Server Relocation. • Planning-level (AACE Class 5) opinion of probable cost.
Task 5. Remote Access Improvements Basis of Design and Cost Estimate The objective of this task is to investigate and define the scope, level of effort, and planning-level cost required to implement Project P1-3 – Remote Access Improvements. This task will not include procurement or deployment of a remote access solution, but will establish the technical framework, cybersecurity requirements, and budget necessary for future execution. Work activities under this task include:
• Existing Status Review – West Yost will review the City’s current remote access architecture, including VPN configuration, firewall rules, authentication methods, remote desktop services, mobile device access, and third-party access pathways into the SCADA environment. This review will include coordination with both Utilities and IT staff. • Cybersecurity and Operational Requirements Definition – In coordination with City staff, West Yost will define remote access objectives including multi-factor authentication requirements, role-based access control, session monitoring expectations, encryption standards, vendor access controls, audit logging, and operational usability requirements. An evaluation of available remote access solutions will be conducted, and options will be presented to the City to assist in selection.
• Implementation Approach and Governance Framework – West Yost will outline a high-level implementation strategy including user onboarding, vendor access management, testing procedures, cutover sequencing, and policy updates. This will include identification of required updates to SCADA access control standards and roles and responsibilities documentation. • Planning-Level Cost Estimate Development – West Yost will prepare a planning-level cost estimate consistent with an AACE Class 5 estimate. The estimate will include anticipated licensing costs, hardware (if required), configuration services, integration support, training, and contingency.
Task 5 Assumptions
• This task is limited to development of a Basis of Design and planning-level cost estimate and does not include procurement or deployment of remote access software or hardware. • The City will provide existing firewall, VPN, and network architecture documentation for review.
Todd Yamello
May 26, 2026
• The cost estimate will be developed for budgeting purposes and will not represent a final construction or procurement estimate.
Task 5 Deliverables
• Basis of Design memorandum for P1-3 Remote Access Improvements. • Planning-level (AACE Class 5) opinion of probable cost. • High-level project schedule framework.
Task 6. OT System Monitoring Implementation Basis of Design and Cost Estimate The objective of this task is to investigate and define the scope, level of effort, and planning-level cost required to implement Project P1-4 – OT System Monitoring Implementation. This task will not include procurement or deployment of monitoring tools, but will establish the technical framework, functional requirements, and budget necessary for future execution. Work activities under this task include:
• OT System Monitoring Basis of Design – West Yost will review existing SCADA/OT monitoring tools, logging, cybersecurity, alerting, and related IT/Utilities workflows; define functional requirements for OT asset visibility, vulnerability management, threat detection, log aggregation, forensic analysis, and IT security integration; evaluate potential OT monitoring solutions; and develop a phased implementation and operational strategy. The work will culminate in an OT System Monitoring Basis of Design documenting the recommended monitoring approach, key requirements, implementation plan, and ongoing support model. • Planning-Level Cost Estimate Development – West Yost will prepare a planning-level cost estimate consistent with an AACE Class 5 estimate. The estimate will include anticipated software licensing, hardware appliances (if required), configuration services, integration support, training, and contingency.
Task 6 Assumptions
• This task is limited to development of a Basis of Design and planning-level cost estimate and does not include procurement, configuration, or deployment of monitoring systems. • The City will provide documentation of existing monitoring tools and network architecture. • The cost estimate will be prepared for budgeting purposes only and will not represent a final implementation estimate.
Task 6 Deliverables
• Basis of Design memorandum for P1-4 OT System Monitoring Implementation. • Planning-level (AACE Class 5) opinion of probable cost.
Task 7. As-Needed Services
The objective of this task is to provide additional services related to the previous tasks as requested by the City up to the budget amount shown in Table 1. Some potential additional services may include:
• As-Needed Owner’s Advisor/Technical Support – West Yost will provide as-needed owner’s advisor/technical advisory support to City IT and Utilities staff with the Backup Core SCADA
Todd Yamello
May 26, 2026
Server Relocation (Task 4) and OT System Monitoring Implementation (Task 6) to confirm that the implementation of these projects are consistent with the Basis of Design, operational continuity needs, cybersecurity objectives, and SCADA resilience goals. Support may include participation in coordination meetings; review of relocation concepts, implementation plans, vendor materials and proposals, equipment selections, proposed architectures, network and virtualization approaches, backup and recovery strategies, integration approaches, testing/cutover procedures, and procurement-related technical information; and recommendations related to OT asset visibility, vulnerability management, threat detection, log aggregation, alerting, forensic capability, and IT security integration. • On-Call SCADA Integration RFQ Development – West Yost will support the City in developing an RFQ to establish a pool of qualified SCADA system integrators for on-call services. This includes preparing the RFQ, defining evaluation criteria, reviewing submittals, and supporting the City through the selection process.
Task 7 Assumptions
• West Yost will perform additional, as-needed services up the amount allocated to this task only after receiving a request and written authorization from the City. • West Yost will provide a separate estimate for each request on a time-and-materials basis up to the level of effort shown in Table 1.
Task 7 Deliverables
• Deliverables are TBD based on services requested by the City.
Todd Yamello
May 26, 2026
PROJECT BUDGET
West Yost’s proposed level of effort and budget for each of the tasks described above is shown in Table 1.
West Yost will perform the scope of services described above on a time-and-expenses basis, at the billing rates set forth in West Yost’s attached 2026 Billing Rate Schedule, with a not-to-exceed budget of $349,693. Additional services not included in this scope of services will be performed only after receiving written authorization and a corresponding budget augmentation.
Table 1. Estimated Project Hours and Budget
Task
Level of
Effort, hours
Estimated Budget,
dollars
Task 1. Project Management 100 $25,209
Task 2. AWIA Cybersecurity Assessment Crosswalk and Gap Analysis 48 $11,608 Task 3. SCADA Standards Development 772 $182,470
Task 4. Backup Core SCADA Server Relocation Basis of Design and Cost Estimate
80 $18,020
Task 5. Remote Access Improvements Basis of Design and Cost Estimate
160 $38,506
Task 6. OT System Monitoring Implementation Basis of Design and Cost Estimate
80 $18,880
Task 7. As-Needed Services 200 $55,000
Total Project Hours and Budget 1,440 $349,693
SCHEDULE
West Yost anticipates providing deliverables based on the schedule shown in Attachment A.
Project Schedule.
Todd Yamello
May 26, 2026
Thank you for providing West Yost with the opportunity to be of continued service to the City. We look forward to working with you on this important project. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
WEST YOST
Daniel Groves, PE
Engineering Manager
RCSE #7454
cc: Michael Gruenbaum
Attachment(s): A. Project Schedule
B. West Yost’s 2026 Billing Rate Schedule
Project Schedule
Attachment A
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish PredecessorsWork Cost 1 Pleasanton - SCADA Standards Development 240.5 days Mon 7/27/26 Mon 6/28/27 1,240 hrs $349,693.97 2 Key Milestones 0 days Mon 7/27/26 Mon 7/27/26 0 hrs $0.003 Notice to Proceed 0 days Mon 7/27/26 Mon 7/27/26 0 hrs $0.004 Task 1 - Project Management 221.5 days Mon 8/17/26 Tue 6/22/27 100 hrs $25,209.465 Kickoff Meeting 4 hrs Mon 8/17/26 Mon 8/17/26 3FS+3 wks 8 hrs $2,208.166 Project Closeout 1 wk Tue 6/15/27 Tue 6/22/27 21 2 hrs $577.037 Task 2 - AWIA Crosswalk 55 days Mon 8/17/26 Mon 11/2/26 48 hrs $11,608.568 2025 Assessment Review 2 wks Mon 8/17/26 Mon 8/31/26 5 8 hrs $2,088.329 SCADA Management Plan Crosswalk 3 wks Mon 8/31/26 Mon 9/21/26 8 16 hrs $3,796.08 10 Summary TM Development 6 wks Mon 9/21/26 Mon 11/2/26 9 24 hrs $5,724.1611 Task 3 - SCADA Standards Development 170 days Mon 11/2/26 Mon 6/28/27 772 hrs $182,469.5912 As-Built Documentation Review 1 mon Mon 11/2/26 Mon 11/30/26 7 32 hrs $7,472.3213 Instrumentation Standards 2 mons Mon 11/30/26 Mon 1/25/27 12 96 hrs $22,314.7614 SCADA Hardware Standards 2 mons Mon 1/25/27 Mon 3/22/27 13 100 hrs $24,161.1815 Controller Programming Standards 1 mon Mon 3/22/27 Mon 4/19/27 14 144 hrs $33,793.6516 Tagging Standards 2 wks Mon 3/22/27 Mon 4/5/27 14 78 hrs $17,963.6317 Graphical Standards 3 mons Mon 4/5/27 Mon 6/28/27 16 164 hrs $39,380.1118 Alarming Philosophy and Management 2 wks Mon 4/5/27 Mon 4/19/27 16 70 hrs $16,464.2319 HMI Database Conventions 1 wk Mon 4/19/27 Mon 4/26/27 18 20 hrs $4,585.9320 Reporting Standards 1 mon Tue 5/11/27 Tue 6/8/27 19FS+11 days48 hrs $11,747.8521 Version Control Standards 1 wk Tue 6/8/27 Tue 6/15/27 20 20 hrs $4,585.9322 Task 4 - Backup Core SCADA Relocation Basis of Design & Cost Estimate
30 days Mon 11/2/26 Mon 12/14/26 7 80 hrs $18,020.64
23 Basis of Design Development 4 wks Mon 11/2/26 Mon 11/30/26 60 hrs $13,460.3224 Cost Estimate Development 10 days Mon 11/30/26 Mon 12/14/26 23 20 hrs $4,560.3225 Task 5 - Remote Access Improvements Basis of Design & Cost Estimate
60 days Mon 12/14/26 Mon 3/8/27 22SS+30
days
160 hrs $38,505.82
26 Existing Status Review 4 wks Mon 12/14/26 Mon 1/11/27 40 hrs $9,261.7427 Objectives and Design Criteria Development 20 days Mon 1/11/27 Mon 2/8/27 26 32 hrs $7,804.5128 Implementation Approach and Cost Estimate Development
4 wks Mon 2/8/27 Mon 3/8/27 27 88 hrs $21,439.58
29 Task 6 - OT System Monitoring Basis of Design & Cost Estimate
30 days Mon 1/25/27 Mon 3/8/27 25SS+30
days
80 hrs $18,879.91
30 Existing Status Review 4 wks Mon 1/25/27 Mon 2/22/27 60 hrs $14,112.4531 Objectives and Design Criteria Development 10 days Mon 2/22/27 Mon 3/8/27 30 20 hrs $4,767.4532 Task 7 - As-needed Services 3 mons Mon 3/8/27 Mon 5/31/27 29 0 hrs $55,000.00 7/27
7/27
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Qtr 3, 2026 Qtr 4, 2026 Qtr 1, 2027 Qtr 2, 2027 Qtr 3, 2027 TaskSplitMilestone
SummaryProject SummaryInactive Task
Inactive MilestoneInactive SummaryManual Task
Duration-onlyManual Summary RollupManual Summary
Start-onlyFinish-onlyExternal Tasks
External MilestoneDeadlineProgress
Manual Progress
Project: Pleasanton - SCADA StDate: Tue 5/26/26
West Yost’s 2026 Billing Rate Schedule
Attachment B
(Effective January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026)*
POSITIONS
ENGINEERING
Principal/Vice President $392
Engineer/Scientist/Geologist Manager I / II $370 / $387 Principal Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $333 / $355 Senior Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $297 / $312
Associate Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $246 / $265 Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II / III $191 / $221 / $231 Engineering Aide $117
Field Monitoring Services $145
Administrative I / II / III / IV $107 / $133 / $160 / $176
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
Engineering Tech Manager I / II $384 / $387
Principal Tech Specialist I / II $353 / $365
Senior Tech Specialist I / II $320 / $334
Senior GIS Analyst $292
GIS Analyst $277
Technical Specialist I / II / III / IV $206 / $231 / $261 / $291 Technical Analyst I / II $148 / $176
Technical Analyst Intern $119
Cross-Connection Control Specialist I / II / III / IV $154 / $167 / $188 / $208 CAD Manager $233
CAD Designer I / II $181 / $204
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Senior Construction Manager $373
Construction Manager I / II / III / IV $222 / $237 / $251 / $318 Resident Inspector (Prevailing Wage Groups 4 / 3 / 2 / 1) $200 / $222 / $247 / $256 Apprentice Inspector $181
CM Administrative I / II $96 / $130
Field Services $256
2026 Billing Rate Schedule
LABOR CHARGES (DOLLARS PER HOUR)
■ Hourly rates include charges for technology and communication, such as general and CAD computer software, telephone calls, routine in-house copies/prints, postage, miscellaneous supplies, and other incidental project expenses. ■ Outside services, such as vendor reproductions, prints, and shipping; major West Yost reproduction efforts; as well as engineering supplies, etc., will be billed at the actual cost plus 15%. ■ The Federal Mileage Rate will be used for mileage charges and will be based on the Federal Mileage Rate applicable to when the mileage costs were incurred. Travel other than mileage will be billed at cost. ■ Subconsultants will be billed at actual cost plus 10%. ■ Expert witness services, research, technical review, analysis, preparation, and meetings will be billed at 150% of standard hourly rates. Expert witness testimony and depositions will be billed at 200% of standard hourly rates. ■ A finance charge of 1.5% per month (an annual rate of 18%) on the unpaid balance will be added to invoice amounts if not paid within 45 days from the date of the invoice. * This schedule is updated annually Page 1 of 2
(Effective January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026)* Equipment Charges
EQUIPMENT
2" Purge Pump & Control Box $300 / day
Aquacalc / Pygmy or AA Flow Meter $28 / day
Emergency SCADA System $35 / day
Field Vehicles (Groundwater) $200 / day
Gas Detector $80 / day
Generator $60 / day
Hydrant Pressure Gauge $10 / day
Hydrant Pressure Recorder, Impulse (Transient) $55 / day Hydrant Pressure Recorder, Standard $40 / day
Low Flow Pump Back Pack $135 / day
Low Flow Pump Controller $200 / day
Powers Water Level Meter $32 / day
Precision Water Level Meter 300ft $30 / day
Precision Water Level Meter 500ft $40 / day
Precision Water Level Meter 700ft $45 / day
QED Sample Pro Bladder Pump $65 / day
Skydio 2+ Drone (2 hour minimum) $100 / hour
Storage Tank $20 / day
Sump Pump $24 / day
Transducer Communications Cable $10 / day
Transducer Components (per installation) $23 / day
Trimble GPS – Geo 7x $220 / day
Tube Length Counter $22 / day
Turbidity Meter $30 / day
Turbidity Meter (2100Q Portable) $35 / day
Vehicle (Construction Management) $18.75 / hour
Water Flow Probe Meter $20 / day
Water Quality Meter $50 / day
Water Quality Multimeter $185 / day
Well Sounder $30 / day
BILLING RATES
2026 Billing Rate Schedule
* This schedule is updated annually Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT B
LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
California Government Code § 84308, commonly referred to as the “Levine Act,” prohibits any officer of a local government agency from participating in the consideration or action related to a proceeding, including the award of a contract, if he or she receives political contribution(s) totaling more than $500 within the preceding 12 months while the proceeding is pending, and for 12 months following the date of the final decision in a proceeding or award of a contract. This prohibition applies when an officer accepts, solicits, or directs contributions on the officer’s own behalf, on behalf of another officer, on behalf of any candidate for office, or on behalf of any committee.
A list of the members of the City Council can be located at:
https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/our-government/mayor-city-council/
1. Have you or your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions of more than $500 to any City officer in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposals or the anticipated date of any Council action related to this contract?
□ YES □ NO
If YES, please identify the person(s) or agent(s) making the contribution:
____________________________________________________________ If YES, please identify the officer receiving the contribution:
____________________________________________________________
2. Do you, or your company, or any agent on behalf of you or you company, anticipate or plan to make any political contributions of more than $500 to any City officer in the 12 months following any Council action related to this contract? □ YES □ NO
If YES, please identify the person(s) or agent(s) making the contribution:
____________________________________________________________ If YES, please identify the officer receiving the contribution:
____________________________________________________________
Answering YES does not preclude the City of Pleasanton from awarding a contract or taking subsequent action related to the item. It does, however, preclude the identified City officer from participating in any actions related to such an item.
By signing below, you certify you also agree to disclose to the City any future contributions made to a City officer by you or your agent(s) after the date of signing this disclosure form, and within 12 months following the approval, renewal, or extension of the requested contract.
I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
Signed: __________________________ Date: ________________ Print Name: __________________________ Title: ________________ Company: __________________________
Item #10
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
July 21, 2026
Public Works - Engineering Division
TITLE: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PERFORMED BY DPI, INC., FOR THE
ANNUAL STORM DRAIN REPAIR/REPLACEMENT (PURI COURT) PROJECT, CIP 24415 AND 25415, AND APPROVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO THE
STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT FUND
SUMMARY
The project includes storm drain improvements on Puri Court, including replacement of existing buried pipes with new, larger pipes and installation of a new box culvert to improve flow capacity and reduce future flood risk. The project was initiated in response to storm events during the winter of late 2022 through early 2023 when runoff from the hillside west of Foothill Road overwhelmed the storm drain network serving Foothill Road and Puri Court.
On April 15, 2025, the City Council awarded a construction contract to DPI, Inc., for CIP Nos. 24415 and 25415, with total project expenditures anticipated at $1,827,201. The work has been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director and in accordance with the approved plans and special provisions. Staff recommends that the City Council accept the project as complete.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Accept the Annual Storm Drain Repair/Replacement (Puri Court) project, CIP 25415, as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion pursuant to California Civil Code section 9204;
2. Authorize the release of retention in the amount of $57,504.29 to DPI, Inc., 30 calendar days after recordation of the Notice of Completion; and
3. Approve a budget amendment returning $558,382 in remaining project funding to the Annual Storm Drain Repair/Replacement Fund (Fund 441) for future eligible projects.
BACKGROUND
The project was advertised, and sealed bids were opened on March 25, 2025. A total of nine bids were received, ranging from $1,084,777 to $1,834,000. DPI, Inc., submitted the lowest responsive bid in the amount of $1,084,777, which was 19 percent lower than the Engineer’s Estimate. The Public Works Director was authorized to approve change orders up to the project contingency amount of $157,317. The project also required expenditures for consultant contracts and related services, as detailed in Attachment 2.
DISCUSSION
The project included replacement of 415 lineal feet of storm drain pipe and 52 lineal feet of box culvert, installation of a storm manhole, a headwall, and minor concrete and landscape restoration in areas where excavation affected front yards within the residential neighborhood.
Four contract change orders were issued during construction, resulting in a net cost increase of $101,309, or 9.7 percent above the original contract amount. All work has been completed and is ready for final acceptance by the City Council. Acceptance of the public improvements will marginally increase the City’s inventory of infrastructure requiring long-term maintenance, however, the improvements correct an existing system deficiency and reduce the City's overall maintenance burden.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
The project was determined to be categorically exempt from CEQA, as documented in a Notice of Exemption filed pursuant to Section 15302, “Replacement or Reconstruction”.
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Not applicable, as this item is a routine matter of City business.
OUTREACH
City staff conducted neighborhood outreach meetings with residents to explain constructionrelated project impacts. In addition, the contractor distributed notices to residents immediately before work began.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Approval of this action advances the citywide ONE Pleasanton Strategic Plan goals of Safeguarding Our City, Strategy 4 - Identify funding sources and implement the hazard mitigation plan to address response to natural disasters, and Investing in Our Environment, Strategy 1 - Implement the Four-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
FISCAL IMPACT
Total funding for this project was $1,827,201. Total expenditures were $1,268,819, leaving a remaining balance of $558,382, as shown in Attachment 2. Staff recommends returning the remaining balance to the Annual Storm Drain Repair/Replacement Fund (Fund 441) for future eligible projects through the CIP prioritization process.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Michael Stella, City
Engineer
Siew-Chin Yeong, Director of Public
Works
Joe Calabrigo, Interim
City Manager
Attachments:
1. Project Location Map
2. Financial Expenditure Summary
BLACK AVE
BERNAL AVE
INTERSTATE CALIFORNIA 680
CASE AVE
HOPYARD RD
SUNOL BLVD
STONERIDGE DR
BERNAL COMMUNITY
PARK
W LAS POSITAS BLVD
FOOTHILL RD
VAL VISTA
COMMUNITY
PARK
STONERIDGE MALL
LIBRARY
INTERSTATE CALIFORNIA 680
OLD BERNAL
AVE
HOPYARD ROAD
VALLEY AVE JUNIPERO ST
THERMO FISHER
SCIENTIFIC
FOOTHILL RD
FOOTHILL RD
SANTOS RANCH RD FOOTHILL KNOLS DR PURI CT
FOOTHILLS HIGH
SCHOOL VALLEY AVE
ALAMEDA
COUNTY
FAIRGROUNDS
BERNAL AVE
EQUUS CT
VALLEY AVE W LAS POSITAS BLVD
PROJECT SITE
STONERIDGE DR
PLEASANTON
RIDGE REGIONAL PARK
AUGUSTIN
BERNAL PARK
KEN MERCER
SPORTS
PARK
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
CITY OF PLEASANTON
PURI COURT STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
CIP NO. 25415
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
LOCATION MAP
NTS
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Project Funding to Date Amount Totals
Annual Storm Repair/ Replacement (Puri Court) CIP No.
25415
2024-25 CIP Allocation (Storm Drain Replacement & Renovation - Fund 441) $1,750,000
CIP No. 25415 Sub-Total $1,750,000
Annual Storm Repair/ Replacement CIP No. 24415
2023-24 CIP Allocation (Storm Drain Replacement & Renovation - Fund 441) $125,000
2024-25 CIP Reduction at Carryforward (Storm Drain Replacement & Renovation -Fund 441) (47,799)
CIP No. 24415 Sub-Total $77,201
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING TO DATE
Project Expenditures to Date
Alameda County Clerk (Paid under CIP 24415) $50
Pakpour Consulting (Design) (Paid under CIP 24415) 68,526 George Bianchi Construction (Concrete Repairs) (Paid under CIP 24415) 8,625
Advertising (Paid under CIP 25415) 747
DPI, Inc. - Construction Contract (Contract No. 2025548) (Paid under CIP 25415) 1,048,777
DPI, Inc. - Contract Change Order No. 1 46,407
DPI, Inc. - Contract Change Order No. 2 16,598
DPI, Inc. - Contract Change Order No. 3 & 4 38,304
Pakpour Consulting (Construction and Design Support) (Paid under CIP 25415) 12,290
Geocon Consultants (Material Testing) (Paid under CIP 25415) 17,615 Miscellaneous (Paid under CIP 25415) 10,880
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Funding Balance/ (Shortfall)
Project Balance $ 558,382
$1,268,819
$1,827,201
ANNUAL STORM REPAIR / REPLACEMENT (PURI COURT)
CIP NO. 24415 & 25415
07/21/26
Item #11
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
July 21, 2026
Public Works - Utilities Division
TITLE: ACCEPT THE FINAL SEWER RATE STUDY REPORT AND AUTHORIZE PROPOSITION 218 NOTICING FOR SEWER RATE CHANGES
SUMMARY
In September 2024, the City contracted with Water Resources Economics, LLC (WRE) to perform a comprehensive sewer rate study to establish cost-based, fair, and legally defensible rates and connection fees that support the long-term financial sustainability of the City's sewer program. The study evaluates a four-year financial plan for fiscal year (FY) 2026/27 through 2029/30 to determine revenue needs, conduct a cost-of-service analysis, develop four-year sewer rate schedules for calendar years 2027 through 2030, and update sewer connection fees for 2027 that will be adjusted annually by the consumer price index (CPI). The 2026 Sewer Rate Study report presented here documents the proposed rate development process and demonstrates the nexus between the City's costs and the rates charged to customers. The proposed four-year sewer rate and connection fee schedules are included in the 2026 Sewer Rate Study report.
Under Proposition 218, the City must notify all property owners or customers of record of proposed changes to sewer rates and hold a public hearing before adopting those rates. If a majority of customers submit written protests, the proposed rate changes cannot be adopted. If a majority protest is not received, the City Council may adopt the proposed changes, but is not obligated to do so. Attached to this staff report is the proposed Proposition 218 notice, with rates effective January 2027. Although changes to connection fees are not subject to Proposition 218 requirements, the attached notice includes these proposed fees for informational purposes. Approval of this item will initiate the public review process required under Proposition 218.
The next steps include issuing the Proposition 218 notice in September 2026, followed by a public review period from September through November 2026, with a public hearing scheduled for November 17, 2026 to consider adoption of the proposed rates and connection fees. If approved, the updated rates and connection fees will take effect on January 1, 2027.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Accept the 2026 Sewer Rate Study Report; and
2. Authorize Proposition 218 noticing for sewer rate changes.
BACKGROUND
The City of Pleasanton owns and operates a sewer collection system comprising approximately 253 miles of gravity sewers, approximately 4.9 miles of force mains, eight siphons, 11 active pump stations, and approximately 21,000 service connections. The average
dry weather flow is approximately 6 million gallons per day (MGD). The City has agreements with the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) and the City of Livermore (for the Ruby Hill service area) for wastewater treatment and is a member of the Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency (LAVWMA) for treated wastewater disposal. The City also has agreements with Alameda County that allow sewage flows from the Castlewood Service Area to be transported through the City’s collection system for treatment at DSRSD. The City’s sewer system operation and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are guided by the Sewer System Management Plan approved by the City Council in July 2025.
On June 17, 2025, the City Council adopted the Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP). On November 4, 2025, the City Council approved the long-term sewer CIP to guide sewer program management, support infrastructure sustainability, and reduce the risk of sewer overflows. To maintain financial sustainability as the SSMP is implemented, the City is conducting the 2026 Sewer Rate Study (Rate Study) to evaluate the sewer enterprise’s financial condition and develop cost-based, equitable rates that recover the cost of service across customer classes.
On February 17, 2026, the City Council received the financial plan analysis for the 2026 Sewer Rate Study and approved implementation of Scenario 1 - Maintain.
On April 21, 2026, staff conducted a workshop with the City Council to present the proposed sewer rate structure and preliminary findings of the Sewer Rate Study, including an overview of the sewer rates needed to implement the Maintain scenario.
On June 2, 2026, the City Council approved the proposed sewer rate structure, sewer rates, and updated sewer connection fees to support implementation of the Sewer Rate Study’s Maintain scenario. Although connection fees are not subject to the Proposition 218 process, City Council approval of the updated connection fees concurrently with the sewer rate adjustments, effective January 2027, is essential to support the long-term financial sustainability of the sewer enterprise program.
Following City Council direction on the sewer rate structure, sewer rates, and updated sewer connection fees, staff finalized the Sewer Rate Study report and prepared the Proposition 218 notice based on the approved data. Staff is now seeking City Council acceptance of the final Sewer Rate Study report and authorization to initiate the Proposition 218 process.
DISCUSSION
The City of Pleasanton periodically evaluates its sewer rates to ensure they generate sufficient revenue to operate, maintain, rehabilitate, and replace the City's wastewater collection system in a financially sustainable and legally compliant manner. A comprehensive sewer rate study is necessary to determine the true cost of providing sewer service, evaluate long-term infrastructure needs, and establish equitable, cost-based rates that comply with California law.
Sewer service is a continuous 24-hour public utility that protects public health and the environment by safely collecting, transporting, treating, and disposing of wastewater. In Pleasanton, customers pay two separate sewer charges. The City's sewer rate funds the local collection system, while wastewater treatment costs are established by DSRSD, or the City of Livermore for the Ruby Hill service area, and are passed directly through to customers.
The City's sewer rate supports the operation, maintenance, inspection, cleaning, repair, and replacement of the local wastewater collection system. Sewer revenues also fund routine cleaning, closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspections, root control, emergency response to sewer blockages and overflows, regulatory compliance under the State's Sewer System Management Plan and capital improvements needed to rehabilitate aging infrastructure and reduce the risk of sewer spills and system failures.
Regional treatment charges collected on behalf of DSRSD and the City of Livermore fund the transportation, treatment, and disposal of wastewater after it leaves the City's collection system. These charges support regional interceptor pipelines, wastewater treatment facilities, biosolids management, facility maintenance, and compliance with state and federal environmental regulations.
Much of Pleasanton's sewer infrastructure was installed decades ago and is reaching the point where significant rehabilitation or replacement is needed. Maintaining a reliable sewer system requires ongoing investment to reduce the risk of pipe failures, sanitary sewer overflows, service disruptions, and costly emergency repairs while protecting public health and the environment.
Historically, the City has relied primarily on annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments to increase sewer rates. Although these adjustments helped address inflationary operating costs, they did not evaluate whether revenues were sufficient to support long-term capital rehabilitation, regulatory compliance, or the full cost of providing service. As a result, deferred maintenance needs have increased, and the cost of maintaining the aging system has continued to grow.
This comprehensive sewer rate study is the first cost-of-service analysis undertaken by the City to evaluate whether sewer rates accurately reflect the cost of serving each customer class. The study incorporates updated operating costs, regional treatment charges, capital improvement needs identified through the recently updated SSMP and Long-Term CIP, and long-term financial projections.
Completing this study also supports compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board's Sewer System Management Plan requirements, which require wastewater agencies to demonstrate adequate financial resources to properly operate, maintain, rehabilitate, and replace their sewer systems over time. Establishing rates through a comprehensive cost-ofservice analysis provides the City with a sustainable funding strategy to maintain regulatory compliance, protect public health, and ensure reliable wastewater service for the community.
The final Sewer Rate Study report is included as Attachment 1. The financial plan, sewer rate structure, sewer rate, and updated sewer connection fees are summarized below.
Financial Plan
The approved financial plan scenario includes four years of revenue adjustments to maintain financial sufficiency and resiliency, as well as three debt issuances in fiscal year (FY) 2028 through FY 2030 to fund $28.0 million of CIP. Under this scenario, the City will meet its operating reserve target by the end of the planning period in FY 2030.
Table 1. Revenue Adjustments FY 2027 - 2030
Sewer Rate Structure
Under the proposed sewer rate structure:
1. Residential customers, including single-family, single-family with accessory dwelling unit (ADU), condominium, and multi-family customers, will pay bimonthly fixed charges.
2. Condominium and multi-family bimonthly fixed charges are aligned to simplify the City's rate structure and better align with peer agency practices, including DSRSD.
3. Commercial and industrial customer categories with differing variable charges will be consolidated into a single variable charge applicable to all commercial and industrial customers, consistent with cost-of-service principles and DSRSD customer classifications. Sewer charges for commercial and industrial customers are based on bimonthly water usage in hundred cubic feet (ccf).
Sewer Rate
Residential customers are charged a fixed sewer rate regardless of how much wastewater an individual household generates. Pleasanton’s residential sewer charge is structured as a fixed charge because the City’s sewer collection system costs are largely independent of day-to-day water use. Unlike water rates, which are based on metered water consumption, residential sewer rates are based on average indoor water use assumptions informed by data from the American Community Survey and industry standards.
Commercial, industrial, and institutional customers are charged a variable sewer rate based on estimated wastewater flow, as determined by winter water usage and strength characteristics associated with the type of business or facility.
Regional wastewater treatment charges from DSRSD or the City of Livermore are also included as pass-through charges on customer bills and vary by customer classification and treatment requirements. These rates are not set or controlled by the City.
The proposed Pleasanton-only sewer rates, excluding DSRSD or Livermore treatment charges, are as follows:
Table 2. Proposed Pleasanton-Only Sewer Rates
Fiscal Year Effective Date Revenue Adjustments Debt Proceeds for CIP FY 2027 1/1/2027 100.0% $0
FY 2028 7/1/2027 10.0% $6,000,000
FY 2029 7/1/2028 10.0% $16,000,000
FY 2030 7/1/2029 10.0% $6,000,000
Total $28,000,000
Pleasanton Collection Sewer Rates Current Effective Effective Effective Effective
DSRSD and the City of Livermore treatment pass-through charges are shown in the table below. DSRSD and the City of Livermore may update the treatment charges annually. These are direct pass-through charges, meaning customers will pay the actual amount charged by the treatment agency.
Table 3. DSRSD and Livermore Treatment Pass-Through Charges 7/1/2026 1/1/2027 7/1/2027 7/1/2028 7/1/2029
Bimonthly Fixed Residential
Charges ($/ DU)
Single-Family $31.70 $57.03 $62.74 $69.02 $75.93
Single-Family w/ 2nd Residence $48.28 $96.53 $106.19 $116.81 $128.50 Condominium $21.77 $39.51 $43.47 $47.82 $52.61
Multi-Family $16.58 $39.51 $43.47 $47.82 $52.61
Commercial/Industrial Variable
Charges ($/ccf)
All Commercial/Industrial Customers N/A $4.08 $4.49 $4.94 $5.44 Minimum Charge $16.58 $39.51 $43.47 $47.82 $52.61
Institutional Variable Charges
($/ccf)
Schools, Submetered $1.46 $2.03 $2.24 $2.47 $2.72
Schools, Not Submetered $0.95 $0.88 $0.97 $1.07 $1.18
DSRSD and Livermore Treatment
Pass-Through Charges ($/ ccf)
Billed DSRSD / Livermore
Class
FY 2027 Treatment
Rate
Pleasanton / DSRSD
Single-Family Single-Family $65.58
Single-Family w/ 2nd Residence Single-Family w/ 2nd
Residence $131.17
For the first year, from January 1, 2027, through December 31, 2027, estimated sewer bills are shown in the table below. For non-residential customers, the proposed combined bill is based on estimated average bimonthly use, as shown in the table. Actual bills will vary based on customer usage.
Table 4. Estimated Sewer Bills 2027
Condominium Condominium $51.16
Multi-Family Multi-Family $51.16
Ruby Hill / Livermore
Single-Family Single-Family $155.98
Non-Residential
Auto Steam Cleaning Between 900 and 1,050
mg/L $9.06
Bakery Between 900 and 1,050
mg/L $9.06
Laundry Less than or equal to 300
mg/L $3.80
Grocery with Disposal Between 750 and 900 mg/L $8.01
Mortuary Between 750 and 900 mg/L $8.01
Restaurant, Fast Food Between 450 and 600 mg/L $5.92
Restaurant, Full Service Between 600 and 750 mg/L $6.98 All Other Less than or equal to 300
mg/L $3.80
Schools, Submetered Less than or equal to 300
mg/L $3.80
Schools, Not Submetered Less than or equal to 300
mg/L $3.80
Residential Customers Average Bi-Monthly Use
(ccf)
Proposed Combined
Bill
Pleasanton / DSRSD
Connection Fees
Connection fees are one-time capital fees assessed on new development in the City to recover a proportional share of capital facility investments to be constructed, or previously constructed, for the sewer system to accommodate new growth. Sewer connection fees are calculated for each customer class by multiplying the connection fee per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) by the EDU ratio for that class. Staff recommends updating the apartment and mobile home EDU ratio to match the condominium EDU ratio, consistent with the proposed sewer rate structure changes. The proposed connection fees are as follows:
Single-Family NA $122.61
Single-Family w/ 2nd Residence NA $227.70
Condominium NA $90.67
Multi-Family NA $90.67
Ruby Hill / Livermore
Single-Family NA $213.01
Non-Residential Customers Average Bi-Monthly Use
(ccf)
Proposed Combined
Bill
Auto Steam Cleaning 24 $315.36
Bakery 221 $2,903.94
Laundry 20 $157.60
Grocery with Disposal 171 $2,067.39
Mortuary 15 $181.35
Restaurant, Fast Food 97 $970.00
Restaurant, Full Service 154 $1,703.24
All Other 94 $740.72
Schools, Submetered 172 $1,002.76
Schools, Not Submetered 1,394 $6,523.92
Table 5. Sewer Connection Fees
Sewer Connection Fees EDU Ratio Factor Proposed
Fee
Single-Family Dwelling Unit 1.0000 per house/unit $2,250.00 Townhome, Townhouse, Duet, Duplex 1.0000 per unit $2,250.00 Auxiliary (Secondary) Dwelling Unit 0.0040 per square foot $9.00 Condominium 0.7000 per unit $1,575.00
Apartment, Mobile Home 0.7000 per unit $1,575.00
Regular (low)
Auditoriums 0.0091 per seat $20.48
Auto body shops/Auto dealers 0.0005 per square foot $1.13 Banks, Financial Offices 0.0003 per square foot $0.68
Barber shops / Beauty shops 0.0014 per square foot $3.15 Bars, Cocktail lounges, taverns (w/o dining) 0.0016 per square foot $3.60 Bowling alleys 0.0014 per square foot $3.15
Car washes 0.0077 per square foot $17.33
Churches 0.0227 per seat $51.08
Delicatessen 0.0032 per square foot $7.20
Dental Clinic 0.0041 per square foot $9.23
Dry Cleaners 0.0020 per square foot $4.50
Gas Stations 0.0021 per square foot $4.73
General Retail/ Commercial 0.0002 per square foot $0.45 Gyms, Health Clubs 0.0019 per square foot $4.28
Hospital 1.1364 per bed $2,556.90
Hotels, Motels (no dining facilities) 0.5909 per room $1,329.53 Institutional (Resident) 0.4545 per bed $1,022.63
Laundries, coin-operated 0.5909 per machine $1,329.53
Laundries, full service (commercial) 0.0045 per square foot $10.13 Market - Dry Goods 0.0009 per square foot $2.03
Medical Clinic 0.0017 per square foot $3.83
Medical/ Dental Complex 0.0010 per square foot $2.25
Office Buildings 0.0002 per square foot $0.45
Parks/ Rec
Country Club 0.3182 per person $715.95
Picnic Park 0.0455 per person $102.38
Pool 0.0455 per person $102.38
Tennis Courts, w/ toilet & shower 0.4545 per court $1,022.63 Plant Nursery 0.0004 per square foot $0.90
Printers 0.0006 per square foot $1.35
Public Agencies 0.0002 per square foot $0.45
Recreational vehicle R.V. Park 0.5454 per RV $1,227.15
Schools (excluding cafeteria)
W/o showers 0.0682 per student $153.45
With showers 0.0909 per student $204.53
Theaters 0.0091 per seat $20.48
Veterinary Hospital 0.0015 per square foot $3.38
Warehouse/distribution 0.0001 per square foot $0.23
Regular (medium)
Banquet Facilities - intermittent use 0.0012 per square foot $2.70 Business with cafeteria 0.0027 per square foot $6.08
Cafeteria 0.0025 per square foot $5.63
Hotels/Motels with dining facilities 0.0027 per square foot $6.08 Restaurant, Fast Food 0.0027 per square foot $6.08
Restaurant, Full Service 0.0025 per square foot $5.63
School with cafeteria 0.0027 per square foot $6.08
Regular (high)
Bakeries/ Donut Shops/ Ice Cream Shops 0.0028 per square foot $6.30 Car washes w/ steam cleaning 0.0018 per square foot $4.05 Markets with garbage disposals 0.0077 per square foot $17.33 Mortuaries 0.0009 per square foot $2.03
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Establishing reasonable and equitable sewer rates supports long-term fiscal sustainability of the Sewer Enterprise Fund, helps ensure the City can maintain, rehabilitate, and replace critical infrastructure, and aligns customer charges with the cost of providing service.
OUTREACH
The City has proactively shared information on sewer-related activities and the sewer rate process. Staff will continue communication through community events, flyers, webpages, social media, e-newsletter articles, targeted stakeholder outreach, bill messaging, and Proposition 218 notification mailers.
The City held an online Sewer Rate Study Webinar on July 9 to provide information about the sewer rate study. The following upcoming sessions are also scheduled:
July 23, 10:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. – Senior Center Sewer Rate Study Information Session July 25, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. – Farmers Market Sewer Rate Study Information Session Customers are encouraged to sign up for the City’s special edition Pleasanton Pipeline eNewsletter, which will be issued regularly to keep customers informed about Pleasanton’s 2026 Sewer Rate Update. Customers may also find regular updates on the City’s website at www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/sewer or by following the City on Facebook and Instagram.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This item supports the citywide ONE Pleasanton Strategic Plan goal of Funding our Future, Strategy 3 - Evaluate and update enterprise revenue sources, including utility rates, connection fees, and user fees, to address growth and meet current needs.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Maintain Scenario financial plan requires approximately $27.4 million in additional rate revenue and $28.0 million in debt financing over FY 2026 through FY 2030 to fund increased Operations & Maintenance (43041202), Repair and Replacement (43442201), planned capital improvements in Funds 431 and 432, and key financial performance metrics. Approval of the proposed sewer rate structure will establish the revenue and fee framework needed to implement the Maintain Scenario.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Siew-Chin Yeong, Director
of Public Works
Siew-Chin Yeong, Director of Public
Works
Joe Calabrigo, Interim
City Manager
Attachments:
1. WRE 2026 Sewer Rate Study Final Report
2. Proposed Proposition 218 Notice
City of Pleasanton
2026 Sewer Rate Study
Final Report – July 2026
Prepared by: Water Resources Economics, LLC
Attachment 1
This page intentionally left blank
July 2, 2026
Siew-Chin Yeong
Director of Public Works
City of Pleasanton
P.O. Box 520
Pleasanton, CA 94566
Subject: City of Pleasanton Sewer Rate Study
Dear Ms. Yeong,
Water Resources Economics, LLC (WRE) is pleased to submit this 2026 Sewer Rate Study to the City of Pleasanton (City). The goal of the study was to develop a four-year rate schedule of sewer rates that will sufficiently fund the City’s sewer system expenses, allow the City to meet its financial goals within the study period, and comply with cost-of-service principles.
This study utilized industry-standard rate-setting methodology in accordance with guidelines developed by the American Water Works Association (AWWA) and incorporates guidance provided by the City’s Council. Our project team has a proven track record of developing fair and equitable rates for numerous public utility agencies in California over the past 25 years. We are confident in our ability to develop sewer rates that satisfy the requirements of Proposition 218.
The City’s sewer connection fees, which are one-time fees charged to new customers connecting to the sewer system, were also updated in this study based on the most up-to-date asset valuations and capacity data. The proposed connection fees have been prepared using the buy-in methodology and in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 26.
It has been a pleasure assisting the City, and we appreciate the support provided by yourself, Mr.
Todd Yamello, the City Council, and other City staff during this study.
Sincerely,
Sanjay Gaur Nancy Phan
Founder / President Principal Consultant
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................1
1.1 System Overview ........................................................................................................1
1.2 Rate Study Overview ...................................................................................................1
1.3 Legal Requirements ....................................................................................................2
1.4 Rate-Setting Methodology ...........................................................................................3
1.5 Additional Information and Disclaimers .......................................................................3
1.6 Current Sewer Rates ...................................................................................................3
1.7 Financial Plan.............................................................................................................4
1.8 Status Quo Financial Plan ...........................................................................................6
1.9 Proposed Financial Plan..............................................................................................7
1.10 Cost-of-Service Analysis and Sewer Rates....................................................................9
1.11 Proposed Sewer Rates .............................................................................................. 10
1.12 Connection Fee Methodology .................................................................................... 16
1.13 Proposed Sewer Connection Fees ............................................................................. 17
2. Financial Plan ..........................................................................................................20
2.1 Financial Plan Overview ............................................................................................ 20
2.2 Revenues ................................................................................................................. 20
2.3 Operating Expenses.................................................................................................. 27
2.4 Debt Service............................................................................................................. 28
2.5 Capital Improvement Plan......................................................................................... 29
2.6 Financial Policies...................................................................................................... 30
2.7 Status Quo Financial Plan ......................................................................................... 30
2.8 Proposed Financial Plan............................................................................................ 36
3. Cost-of-Service Analysis and Sewer Rates ................................................................41
3.1 Cost-of-Service and Rate Overview ............................................................................ 41
3.2 Revenue Requirement............................................................................................... 42
3.3 Units of Service and Flow Estimates........................................................................... 43
3.4 Revenue Requirement Allocation............................................................................... 49
3.5 Unit Cost Derivation.................................................................................................. 50
3.6 Proposed Sewer Rate Schedule ................................................................................. 51
3.7 Customer Impacts and Rate Survey ........................................................................... 52
4. Connection Fees......................................................................................................58
4.1 Connection Fee Overview.......................................................................................... 58
4.2 Buy-In Method .......................................................................................................... 58
4.3 Proposed Sewer Connection Fees ............................................................................. 60
4.4 Connection Fee Survey ............................................................................................. 62
5. Appendices .............................................................................................................64
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
ii
5.1 Financial Plan........................................................................................................... 64
5.2 Connection Fees ...................................................................................................... 71
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: Current Pleasanton Collection Sewer Rates ............................................................4 Table 1-2: Adopted Reserve Policy and FY 2026 O&M and Replacement Fund Balance...............6 Table 1-3: Financial Plan Scenario (Status Quo) ......................................................................6 Table 1-4: Financial Plan Scenario (Proposed).........................................................................7 Table 1-5: Current and Proposed Pleasanton Collection Sewer Rates..................................... 11 Table 1-6: DSRSD and Livermore Treatment Pass-Through Charges........................................ 12 Table 1-7: Residential Customer Bi-Monthly Bill Impacts ....................................................... 13 Table 1-8: Non-Residential Customer Impacts ...................................................................... 13 Table 1-9: Sewer Connection Fee Calculation ....................................................................... 17 Table 1-10: Proposed Sewer Connection Fees....................................................................... 17 Table 2-1: Current Pleasanton Collection Sewer Rates .......................................................... 21 Table 2-2: Effective Pleasanton Collection Sewer Rates......................................................... 22 Table 2-3: Projected Customer Accounts (DU) ...................................................................... 23 Table 2-4: Projected Billed Consumption (ccf)....................................................................... 24 Table 2-5: Calculated Rate Revenues ................................................................................... 26 Table 2-6: Projected Revenues Excluding Treatment Pass-Throughs ....................................... 27 Table 2-7: Expense Inflationary Assumptions ........................................................................ 27 Table 2-8: Projected Expenses ............................................................................................. 28 Table 2-9: Proposed Debt Proceeds and Debt Service............................................................ 29 Table 2-10: Capital Improvement Plan and Expense Summary ............................................... 29 Table 2-11: Financial Plan Scenario (Status Quo)................................................................... 30 Table 2-12: Projected Combined Cash Flow (Status Quo) ...................................................... 32 Table 2-13: Projected O&M and Replacement Fund Balances (Status Quo) ............................. 33 Table 2-14: Projected CIP Fund Balances (Status Quo) .......................................................... 34 Table 2-15: Projected Financial Performance (Status Quo)..................................................... 34 Table 2-16: Financial Plan Scenario (Proposed)..................................................................... 36 Table 2-17: Projected Combined Cash Flow (Proposed)......................................................... 37 Table 2-18: Projected O&M and Replacement Fund Balances (Proposed) ............................... 38 Table 2-19: Projected CIP Fund Balances (Proposed)............................................................. 39 Table 2-20: Projected Financial Performance (Proposed) ....................................................... 39 Table 3-1: Revenue Requirement (FY 2027) ........................................................................... 43 Table 3-2: Residential Flow Estimates by Customer Class...................................................... 45 Table 3-3: Non-Residential Flow Estimates by Customer Class .............................................. 46 Table 3-4: Flow Estimates Summary by Customer Class ........................................................ 48 Table 3-5: Revenue Requirement Allocation by Customer Class............................................. 49 Table 3-6: Unit Cost Derivation............................................................................................. 51 Table 3-7: Revenue Adjustments (Proposed) ......................................................................... 51 Table 3-8: Current and Proposed Pleasanton Collection Sewer Rates..................................... 52
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
iii
Table 3-9: DSRSD and Livermore Treatment Pass-Through Charges........................................ 53 Table 3-10: Residential Customer Bi-Monthly Bill Impacts ..................................................... 54 Table 3-11: Non-Residential Customer Bi-Monthly Bill Impacts .............................................. 55 Table 4-1: Buy-In System Value ............................................................................................ 59 Table 4-2: EDU Calculation .................................................................................................. 60 Table 4-3: Sewer Connection Fee Calculation ....................................................................... 60 Table 4-4: Proposed Sewer Connection Fees ........................................................................ 61 Table 5-1: Revenue Detail .................................................................................................... 64 Table 5-2: Sewer O&M (Fund 430) Expense Detail.................................................................. 65 Table 5-3: Sewer Replacement (Fund 434) Expense Detail ..................................................... 68 Table 5-4: Capital Improvement Plan Detail .......................................................................... 69 Table 5-5: Asset Valuation Detail.......................................................................................... 71
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1: Projected O&M and Replacement Fund Balances (Status Quo)................................7 Figure 1-2: Projected O&M and Replacement Fund Balances (Proposed) ..................................8 Figure 1-3: Projected Debt Coverage (Proposed) .....................................................................9 Figure 1-4: Single Family Bi-Monthly Sewer Rate Survey ......................................................... 14 Figure 1-5: Full Service Restaurant Sewer Rate Survey ........................................................... 15 Figure 1-6: Schools Submetered Sewer Rate Survey .............................................................. 15 Figure 1-7: Single Family Sewer Multi-Year Rate Survey.......................................................... 16 Figure 1-8: Sewer Connection Fee Comparisons ................................................................... 19 Figure 2-1: Projected O&M and Replacement Fund Balances (Status Quo).............................. 35 Figure 2-2: Projected O&M and Replacement Fund Balances (Proposed) ................................ 40 Figure 2-3: Projected Debt Coverage (Proposed) ................................................................... 40 Figure 3-1: Single Family Bi-Monthly Sewer Rate Survey ......................................................... 56 Figure 3-2: Full Service Restaurant Sewer Rate Survey ........................................................... 56 Figure 3-3: Schools Submetered Sewer Rate Survey .............................................................. 57 Figure 3-4: Single Family Sewer Multi-Year Rate Survey.......................................................... 57 Figure 4-1: Sewer Connection Fee Comparisons ................................................................... 63
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
The City of Pleasanton (City) provides sewer collection services to over 21,000 Residential, Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional service connections. The City’s service area is in the Amador Valley and is a suburb in the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area, encompassing approximately 25 square miles.
The sewer collection system, which is owned and operated by the City, consists of 8 siphons, 11 lift stations, 6,500 manholes, 4.9 miles of force mains, and 260 miles of gravity pipelines to collect and transport wastewater to regional treatment facilities. The City’s wastewater is transported to Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility, except for wastewater from Ruby Hill area which is sent to the City of Livermore’s Water Reclamation Plant. The City also has agreements with Alameda County that allow wastewater flows from the Castlewood Service Area to be transported though the City’s collection system for DSRSD treatment.
Sewer charges and fees for each customer include both local sewer collection and regional wastewater treatment components. The City sets local collection charges and fees, while regional treatment charges and fees are set by DSRSD and the City of Livermore and are passed through directly to the City’s customers. This study will only evaluate the City’s local sewer collection charges and fees.
1.2 RATE STUDY OVERVIEW
Public retail utility agencies in California typically conduct a cost-of-service study every five years to ensure that customers are appropriately charged for sewer service and to reestablish the costof-service nexus that is required by Proposition 218. The City’s existing sewer rate structure was developed in 2022, and the City has historically only adjusted rates annually based on CPI (Consumer Price Index) to keep pace with inflation and routine O&M (Operations & Maintenance) changes. In 2025, the City updated its Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP), with the latest revision in 2026, and adopted a Long-Term Sewer Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to be reviewed every two years and updated every six years. These documents identify capital improvement, operation, and maintenance needs over the next 20 years and serve as the foundation for future rate-setting and financial planning.
The City engaged Water Resources Economics, LLC (WRE) in 2025 to conduct a comprehensive sewer rate study, with the following objectives:
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
2 • Evaluate financial plan scenarios to meet financial targets for Fiscal Year (FY) 20261 to FY 2030
• Conduct a cost-of-service analysis based on most recent data and customer use characteristics
• Develop a four-year sewer rate schedule for FY 2027 through FY 2030 • Calculate updated sewer connection fees based on most recent cost estimates
1.3 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS2
Legal considerations relating to retail sewer rates in California focus heavily on Proposition 218, which was enacted in 1996 and is now reflected in Article XIII C and Article XIII D of the California Constitution. Proposition 218 states that “property related fees and charges” (which include sewer rates) may not exceed the proportional cost of providing the service to the customer and may not be used for any purpose other than providing said service. The practical implication is that public retail utility agencies in California must demonstrate a sufficient nexus between the costs incurred by the agency to provide sewer service and the rates charged to customers. The primary means by which retail sewer agencies address this requirement is by conducting a “costof-service analysis.” Proposition 218 also affects the rate adoption process by requiring agencies to hold a public hearing to adopt rates. The agency must mail public hearing notices to all customers no fewer than 45 days prior to the public hearing. The public hearing notices must clearly show all proposed rate changes, provide information on the public hearing date/time/location, and provide instructions on how customers may protest the proposed rate changes. If a majority of customers submit a protest, the proposed rate changes cannot be adopted.
Sewer connection fees are regulated under Proposition 26, which was approved by voters in 2010 and amended provisions of Article XIII A and Article XIII C of the California Constitution.
Proposition 26 defines what types of charges are considered a “tax” (which is subject to a twothirds voter approval) and are not considered as such. Based on the definitions provided by Proposition 26, “a charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government conferring the benefit or granting the privilege” and “a charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product” are not considered “taxes.” As such, sewer connection fees are not taxes and do not require two-thirds voter approval. However, the calculation of connection fees must follow cost-of-service principles to prove that the fees 1 FY 2026 is the year starting July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026. 2 Although this section is named “Legal Requirements” and discusses Proposition 218 and 26, WRE is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
3 charged do not exceed the reasonable costs of connecting new customers to the City’s existing sewer system.
1.4 RATE-SETTING METHODOLOGY
This study was conducted using industry-standard methodology outlined by the American Water Works Association (AWWA) in its Manual of Water Supply Practices M1: Principles of Water Rates, Fees and Charges, Seventh Edition (M1 Manual). The rate study process includes the following steps:
The rate study process includes the following steps:
1. Financial Plan: Annual revenues and expenses are projected over the rate-setting period to determine the magnitude of rate increases needed to maintain financial sufficiency.
Financial policies, such as reserve targets, are also evaluated and updated if necessary.
2. Cost-of-Service Analysis: Costs are allocated to customers in proportion to the use of and burden on the sewer system. The overall goal is to establish a robust nexus between the costs incurred by an agency and the rates charged to customers, as required by Proposition 218.
3. Rate Design: The existing rate structure is evaluated, and potential changes are identified.
A multi-year proposed rate schedule is then calculated directly from the results of the financial plan and cost-of-service analysis.
4. Rate Study Documentation: A rate study report is developed to document the proposed rate development process. This provides transparency and enhances legal defensibility in light of Proposition 218 requirements. This document serves as the report for this rate study.
1.5 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLAIMERS
This report summarizes the data, analyses, processes, and results of the City’s sewer rate study.
Some important information to keep in mind when reading the report includes the following:
• All study projections are based on the best available data as of May 2026. • All table values are rounded to the nearest digit shown, unless stated otherwise. However, all calculations are based on precise values. Attempting to manually recreate the calculations described in this report from the values displayed in tables may therefore produce slightly different results.
• All current and proposed rates in this report are shown on a bi-monthly basis.
1.6 CURRENT SEWER RATES
Table 1-1 shows the City’s current sewer collection rates based on the rate structure devised in the most recent sewer rate study from 2022, with rates for following years annually adjusted based on CPI.
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
4 The City’s current sewer rates include bi-monthly fixed charges for Residential customers based on dwelling units (DUs) and consumption charges based on water use in hundred cubic feet (ccf) for Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional customers. Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional customers also have a minimum fixed charge equal to the Multi-Family charge. Note that some Residential customers are charged on the property tax roll and therefore receive one annual bill for sewer service (equal to six billing periods multiplied by the respective residential bi-monthly fixed charge) rather than bi-monthly bills under the utility’s billing system.
The City also has a discount program funded by the City’s General Fund for customers in the Ruby Hill Service Area that receive a 10% discount off all bi-monthly bills. Additionally, customers in the Castlewood Service Area are charged 7.785% of total Pleasanton charges in accordance with agreements with Alameda County to reflect use of the City’s collection system.
Table 1-1: Current Pleasanton Collection Sewer Rates
Line Current Pleasanton Collection
Sewer Rates
Effective
7/1/2024
Effective
1/1/2026
Effective
7/1/2026
1 Bi-Monthly Fixed Charges ($/ DU)
2 Residential
3 Single Family $29.96 $30.77 $31.70
4 Single Family w/ 2nd Residence $45.64 $46.87 $48.28
5 Condo $20.57 $21.13 $21.77
6 Multi-Family $15.67 $16.09 $16.58
7 8 Consumption Charges ($/ ccf)
9 Commercial/ Industrial
10 Auto Steam Cleaning $1.68 $1.73 $1.79
11 Bakery $1.67 $1.72 $1.78
12 Laundry $1.68 $1.73 $1.79
13 Grocery with Disposal $1.62 $1.66 $1.71
14 Mortuary $1.97 $2.02 $2.09
15 Restaurant, Fast Food $1.58 $1.62 $1.67
16 Restaurant, Full Service $1.58 $1.62 $1.67
17 All Other $1.42 $1.46 $1.51
18 Institutional
19 Schools, Submetered $1.37 $1.41 $1.46
20 Schools, Not Submetered $0.90 $0.92 $0.95
21 Minimum Consumption Charge $15.67 $16.09 $16.58
1.7 FINANCIAL PLAN
WRE worked closely with City staff and City Council to determine the financial plan scenario that best suits the City’s needs. The results and recommendations of the sewer rate study are driven
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
5 by the City’s financial performance, input from City staff, and feedback and direction from City Council.
FACTORS AFFECTING FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
The sewer system’s financial performance is driven by the ability of the current sewer rates to meet the City’s funding needs. To maintain financial sufficiency, sewer rates must fully fund O&M costs, CIP expenditures based on the City’s SSMP, and any relevant financial policies, which typically include reserve policy targets and debt coverage requirements.
The key factors affecting financial performance include:
• Substantial capital investment needs over the next four years: The cost of planned CIP expenditures from FY 2026 through FY 2030 totals approximately $39.3 million (M). Of the total cost of planned CIP expenditure, $28.0M will be funded with new debt. This CIP funding plan was designed to address high priority infrastructure needs while phasing other improvements over time to responsibly manage costs and long-term system risks.
The major projects include pipe bridge and siphon improvements as well as lift station, generator, and pipeline replacements intended to meet current sanitary sewer system regulatory requirements outlined by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City Council-approved SSMP on sewer inspection, maintenance, cleaning, repair, and replacement.
• New O&M expenses and cost increases: Implementation of the City’s planned CIP requires new O&M expenses, programs, and additional staffing costs in accordance with the City’s SSMP, totaling approximately $15.3M over the four-year rate setting period.
Additionally, the City’s existing O&M fund base expenses are projected to increase by 3.6% on average over the four-year rate setting period due to inflationary pressures. Based on current rates and projected expenses, the City is not expected to cover its existing O&M expenses in FY 2026.
• Debt coverage requirements: The City plans to issue approximately $28.6M in new debt to fund CIP. Annual debt service payments relating to new debt for CIP fluctuate between $444.8 thousand (K) in FY 2028 and $2.1M in FY 2030. The City must maintain a debt coverage ratio of 125% to meet proposed debt coverage requirements3 . This means that
the City’s net operating revenues (excluding CIP funding sources and expenditure) must be at least 125% greater than proposed annual debt service in each year. • Reserve policy targets: The City’s current operating reserve policy, which is shown in Table 1-2, allows the City to maintain cash on hand to meet short-term cash flow requirements. Sewer utility operations are organized amongst several funds; however, this study focuses on the unrestricted Sewer O&M Fund (Fund 430), Sewer Replacement Fund (Fund 434), and Sewer CIP Fund (Fund 431). The operating reserve policy only applies to 3 Debt coverage is calculated for the entire sewer utility (O&M, Replacement and CIP funds combined).
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
6 Sewer O&M and Replacement Funds (Funds 430 and 434)4. Prior to any revenue adjustments, the District projected O&M and Replacement Fund balances are below the operating reserve target in FY 2026.
Table 1-2: Adopted Reserve Policy and FY 2026 O&M and Replacement Fund Balance Line Adopted Reserve Policy Description FY 2026
1 Operating Reserve Target 35% of annual O&M expenses $7,367,794 2 Ending O&M and Replacement Fund
Balance (Before Rate Adjustments) $6,961,548
1.8 STATUS QUO FINANCIAL PLAN
The first step in evaluating the City’s financial performance is to develop a “status quo financial plan,” which is the scenario in which the City does not increase its sewer rate revenues. This exercise is to determine whether the City’s current sewer rates are sufficient to meet key financial performance metrics. This section shows Sewer O&M and Replacement fund balances.
Table 1-3 shows the revenue adjustments, debt issuance, and debt proceeds for CIP related to the status quo scenario. This scenario assumes no revenue adjustments above the City’s existing sewer rates and no new proposed debt.
Table 1-3: Financial Plan Scenario (Status Quo)
Line Fiscal Year Effective Date Revenue
Adjustments Debt Issuance Debt Proceeds for CIP
1 FY 2027 1/1/2027 0.0% $0 $0
2 FY 2028 7/1/2027 0.0% $0 $0
3 FY 2029 7/1/2028 0.0% $0 $0
4 FY 2030 7/1/2029 0.0% $0 $0
Figure 1-1 shows the projected fund balances under the status quo scenario. The green bars represent the ending fund balances for the O&M and Replacement reserves (Funds 430 and 434), and the dashed line represents the operating reserve policy target. In this scenario, the City will not meet its operating reserve target starting in FY 2026, indicated by the alert balance (red circles). Projected fund balances will be negative starting in FY 2028. 4 The Sewer O&M Fund (Fund 430) supports the utility’s ongoing O&M costs while the Sewer Replacement Fund (Fund 434) supports routine repair and replacement of existing sewer system infrastructure, excluding CIP.
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
7 Figure 1-1: Projected O&M and Replacement Fund Balances (Status Quo)
1.9 PROPOSED FINANCIAL PLAN
Overall annual increases in sewer rate revenues resulting from rate increases are referred to as “revenue adjustments.” WRE worked with City Council and City staff to determine the most appropriate financial plan scenario, which is shown in Table 1-4.
The proposed financial plan scenario includes four years of revenue adjustments, which are required to maintain financial sufficiency and resiliency, and three debt issuances in FY 2028 through FY 2030 to fund $28.0M worth of CIP. Significant projects include pipe bridge and siphon improvements as well as lift station, generator, and pipeline replacements intended to meet current sanitary sewer system regulatory requirements outlined by the SWRCB and City Councilapproved SSMP on sewer inspection, maintenance, cleaning, repair, and replacement.
Table 1-4: Financial Plan Scenario (Proposed)
Line Fiscal Year Effective Date Revenue
Adjustments Debt Issuance Debt Proceeds for CIP
1 FY 2027 1/1/2027 100.0% $0 $0
2 FY 2028 7/1/2027 10.0% $6,122,449 $6,000,000
3 FY 2029 7/1/2028 10.0% $16,326,531 $16,000,000
4 FY 2030 7/1/2029 10.0% $6,122,449 $6,000,000
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
8 PROPOSED FINANCIAL PLAN
The proposed financial plan applies the revenue adjustments and debt issuances, shown in Table 1-4, to reevaluate financial performance based on the Sewer O&M and Replacement fund balances and debt coverage for the newly proposed debt.
Figure 1-2 shows the projected O&M and Replacement fund balances under the proposed scenario. In this scenario, the City will meet its operating reserve target by the end of the planning period in FY 2030.
Figure 1-2: Projected O&M and Replacement Fund Balances (Proposed) Figure 1-3 shows the projected debt coverage under the proposed scenario. In this scenario, the City will meet its debt coverage requirements in all years for newly proposed debt starting in FY 2028.
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
9 Figure 1-3: Projected Debt Coverage (Proposed)
1.10 COST-OF-SERVICE ANALYSIS AND SEWER RATES
A cost-of-service analysis is a technical process used to determine the cost of providing sewer service to the City’s customers based on each customer’s use of and burden on the sewer system. The cost-of-service analysis is the basis of the nexus between the costs incurred by the utility to provide sewer service and the sewer rates charged to customers, which is a requirement of Proposition 218.
COST-OF-SERVICE AND RATES METHODOLOGY
The overall goal of the cost-of-service analysis is to develop “unit costs,” which provide the basis from which proposed rates are directly calculated. Note that although the study period spans multiple years, the cost-of-service analysis is limited to a single representative year referred to as the “test year.” The test year in this study is FY 2027.
The proposed sewer rate schedule was developed based on the results of the proposed financial plan and cost-of-service analysis. The key steps in conducting a cost-of-service analysis and developing the proposed rate schedule are outlined below:
• Revenue requirement determination: The revenue requirement for the test year is determined based on the results of the proposed financial plan and allocated to each customer class based on wastewater flow estimates.
• Unit cost development: Allocated revenue requirements are divided by the appropriate units of service for each customer class to establish unit costs for the test year (FY 2027).
Unit costs represent proposed rates for the first year of rates (FY 2027). Although total rate
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
10 revenues in the first year of adjustments (FY 2027) are designed to increase by the proposed revenue adjustment percentage (100% in FY 2027), the proposed percentage increase to each rate/charge varies due to the updated cost-of-service allocations. • Rate schedule development: Proposed rates for the full study period are calculated by increasing the FY 2027 rates by the proposed annual revenue adjustment percentages from the proposed financial plan.
1.11PROPOSED SEWER RATES
WRE worked with the City Council and City staff to determine the most appropriate sewer rate structure that meets the City’s needs.
PROPOSED RATE STRUCTURE CHANGES
Currently, the City charges different bi-monthly fixed residential charges to Condo and MultiFamily customers. WRE recommends aligning the Condo and Multi-Family bi-monthly fixed charges to simplify the City's rate structure and better align with peer agency practices, including DSRSD. Because Condo and Multi-Family customers have similar household densities and estimated wastewater generation characteristics, combining these customer classes into a single rate is appropriate.
The City also currently charges different Commercial and Industrial variable charges based on commercial class. WRE recommends consolidating these charges into one variable charge applicable to all Commercial and Industrial customers in line with cost-of-service principles and DSRSD’s customer classifications. Collection and transport costs associated with delivering wastewater to regional treatment facilities are primarily driven by wastewater flow and do not vary based on commercial class.
The proposed four-year sewer rate schedule in this section is based on the updated cost-ofservice analysis and the proposed revenue adjustments in the four-year period. The rate schedule shows the proposed sewer rates to be implemented starting in January 2027 and every July thereafter.
Table 1-5 shows the current5 and proposed bi-monthly fixed residential charges, commercial and industrial variable charges, and institutional variable charges. 5 Current rates are based on an assumed 3.0% CPI increase from rates effective in January 2026.
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
11 Table 1-5: Current and Proposed Pleasanton Collection Sewer Rates Line Pleasanton Collection Sewer Rates Current
7/1/2026
Effective
1/1/2027
Effective
7/1/2027
Effective
7/1/2028
Effective
7/1/2029
1 Bi-Monthly Fixed Residential Charges ($/ DU)
2 Single Family $31.70 $57.03 $62.74 $69.02 $75.93
3 Single Family w/ 2nd Residence $48.28 $96.53 $106.19 $116.81 $128.50 4 Condo $21.77 $39.51 $43.47 $47.82 $52.61
5 Multi-Family $16.58 $39.51 $43.47 $47.82 $52.61
6 7 Commercial/Industrial Variable Charges ($/ccf)
8 All Commercial/Industrial Customers N/A $4.08 $4.49 $4.94 $5.44 9 Minimum Charge $16.58 $39.51 $43.47 $47.82 $52.61
10 11 Institutional Variable Charges ($/ccf)
12 Schools, Submetered $1.46 $2.03 $2.24 $2.47 $2.72
13 Schools, Not Submetered $0.95 $0.88 $0.97 $1.07 $1.18
CUSTOMER IMPACTS
WRE evaluated the impacts to all of the City’s customer classes (Residential and NonResidential) based on the proposed sewer rates effective in January 2027 compared to CPIadjusted rates effective in July 2026. Total customer impacts include the effect of both Pleasanton collection charges (Table 1-5) and DSRSD and City of Livermore treatment passthrough charges.
Table 1-6 shows the FY 2027 (Effective 7/1/2026) DSRSD and City of Livermore treatment passthrough charges utilized to show the full customer impact to each customer class. All customer classes receive treatment services from DSRSD except for Ruby Hill customers which receive treatment services from the City of Livermore. To determine the DSRSD treatment rate for each Pleasanton Non-Residential customer class, the most closely associated DSRSD strength class is allocated to each commercial class based on review of account-level FY 2025 Pleasanton and DSRSD billing data.
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
12 Table 1-6: DSRSD and Livermore Treatment Pass-Through Charges Line DSRSD and Livermore Treatment
Pass-Through Charges ($/ ccf)
Billed DSRSD / Livermore
Class
FY 2027
Treatment
Rate
1 Pleasanton / DSRSD
2 Single Family Single Family $65.58
3 Single Family w/ 2nd Residence Single Family w/ 2nd Residence $131.17 4 Condo Condo $51.16
5 Multi-Family Multi-Family $51.16
6 Ruby Hill / Livermore
7 Single Family Single Family $155.98
8 Non-Residential
9 Auto Steam Cleaning Between 900 and 1,050 mg/L $9.06
10 Bakery Between 900 and 1,050 mg/L $9.06
11 Laundry Less than or equal to 300 mg/L $3.80
12 Grocery with Disposal Between 750 and 900 mg/L $8.01 13 Mortuary Between 750 and 900 mg/L $8.01
14 Restaurant, Fast Food Between 450 and 600 mg/L $5.92 15 Restaurant, Full Service Between 600 and 750 mg/L $6.98 16 All Other Less than or equal to 300 mg/L $3.80
17 Schools, Submetered Less than or equal to 300 mg/L $3.80 18 Schools, Not Submetered Less than or equal to 300 mg/L $3.80 Table 1-7 shows the proposed bi-monthly bill impacts for each Residential customer class.
Current and proposed collection bills include City of Pleasanton collection charges only (Table 1-5, Lines 2-5). Current and proposed combined bills include FY 2027 treatment costs in addition to Pleasanton collection bills. Based on current and proposed charges, the bi-monthly impact to Single Family customers will be $25.33.
Note that the City of Livermore currently offers a 10% discount on treatment charges and is currently evaluating a reduction of the Ruby Hill discount. Upon completion of the City of Livermore’s evaluation, City staff will coordinate with City Council on a recommendation for the Ruby Hill discount program. For customer impacts, current combined bills include the discount on treatment charges, and no discount is applied to collection charges nor proposed treatment charges. Based on the current proposed charges, the bi-monthly bill impact to Ruby Hill customers will be $25.33.
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
13 Table 1-7: Residential Customer Bi-Monthly Bill Impacts Line Residential Customers
Current
Collection
Bill
Proposed
Collection
Bill
Difference
($)
Current
Combined
Bill
Proposed
Combined
Bill
Difference
($)
1 Pleasanton / DSRSD
2 Single Family $31.70 $57.03 $25.33 $97.28 $122.61 $25.33 3 Single Family w/ 2nd Residence $48.28 $96.53 $48.25 $179.45 $227.70 $48.25 4 Condo $21.77 $39.51 $17.74 $72.93 $90.67 $17.74
5 Multi-Family $16.58 $39.51 $22.93 $67.74 $90.67 $22.93 6 Ruby Hill / Livermore
7 Single Family $31.70 $57.03 $25.33 $187.68 $213.01 $25.33 Table 1-8 shows the proposed bi-monthly bill impacts for each Non-Residential customer class (including current Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional customer classes) based on average bi-monthly usage in ccf for each class. Current and proposed collection bills include City of Pleasanton collection charges only (Table 1-1, Lines 10-21 and Table 1-5, Line 8). Current and proposed combined bills include FY 2027 treatment costs in addition to Pleasanton collection bills.
The most common Commercial and Industrial customer classifications are All Other and Full Service Restaurant. Based on current and proposed changes, the bi-monthly impact to a typical office or retail customer in the All Other classification using 94 ccf of water will be an increase of $241.58. Similarly, the bi-monthly impact to a Full Service Restaurant using 154 ccf of water will be an increase of $371.14.
For Institutional customers, the most common customer classification is Submetered Schools.
The bi-monthly impact to a Submetered School using 172 ccf of water will be an increase of $98.04.
Table 1-8: Non-Residential Customer Impacts
Line Non-Residential
Customers
Average
BiMonthly
Use (ccf)
Current
Collection
Bill
Proposed
Collection
Bill
Difference
($)
Current
Combined
Bill
Proposed
Combined
Bill
Difference
($)
1 Auto Steam Cleaning 24 $42.96 $97.92 $54.96 $260.40 $315.36 $54.96 2 Bakery 221 $393.38 $901.68 $508.30 $2,395.64 $2,903.94 $508.30 3 Laundry 20 $35.80 $81.60 $45.80 $111.80 $157.60 $45.80 4 Grocery with Disposal 171 $292.41 $697.68 $405.27 $1,662.12 $2,067.39 $405.27 5 Mortuary 15 $31.35 $61.20 $29.85 $151.50 $181.35 $29.85 6 Restaurant, Fast Food 97 $161.99 $395.76 $233.77 $736.23 $970.00 $233.77 7 Restaurant, Full Service 154 $257.18 $628.32 $371.14 $1,332.10 $1,703.24 $371.14 8 All Other 94 $141.94 $383.52 $241.58 $499.14 $740.72 $241.58 9 Schools, Submetered 172 $251.12 $349.16 $98.04 $904.72 $1,002.76 $98.04 10 Schools, Not Submetered 1,394 $1,324.30 $1,226.72 ($97.58) $6,621.50 $6,523.92 ($97.58)
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
14 RATE SURVEY
WRE compared the current and proposed combined bi-monthly sewer bills for Single Family, Full Service Restaurant, and Submetered School customers at average monthly usage relative to the current bills of nearby agencies serving the Tri-Valley Cities (Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton).
Figure 1-4 shows the current and proposed bi-monthly bills for Single Family customers relative to other nearby agencies. Currently Pleasanton bills are comparable to DSRSD and substantially below Livermore bills. After the proposed changes, Pleasanton bills are near the midpoint of the range, remaining higher than DSRSD bills and lower than Livermore bills.
Figure 1-4: Single Family Bi-Monthly Sewer Rate Survey
Figure 1-5 shows the current and proposed bi-monthly bills for Full Service Restaurant customers at average usage (154 ccf) relative to other nearby agencies. Currently Pleasanton bills are the lowest amongst all agencies surveyed. After the proposed changes, Pleasanton bills are near the midpoint of the range, falling higher than DSRSD bills and lower than Livermore bills.
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
15 Figure 1-5: Full Service Restaurant Sewer Rate Survey Figure 1-6 shows the current and proposed bi-monthly bills for Submetered School customers at average usage (172 ccf) relative to other nearby agencies. Currently Pleasanton bills are the lowest amongst all agencies surveyed. After the proposed changes, Pleasanton bills are comparable to Livermore bills, falling higher than DSRSD bills and slightly lower than Livermore bills.
Figure 1-6: Schools Submetered Sewer Rate Survey
Figure 1-7 shows historical and proposed bi-monthly bills for Single Family customers.
Historically (from FY 2023 to FY 2027 CPI adjustment), Pleasanton bills have been comparable to DSRSD. After the proposed changes (FY 2027 to FY 2030), Pleasanton bills are near the midpoint
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
16 of the range, ending substantially higher than DSRSD bills and closer to Livermore bills by FY 2030.
Figure 1-7: Single Family Sewer Multi-Year Rate Survey
1.12 CONNECTION FEE METHODOLOGY
New customer connections to the City’s sewer system are subject to a sewer connection fee, which is necessary to ensure that existing users are not unfairly burdened by costs incurred to provide capacity for new users. The overall purpose of a connection fee is to equitably recover capital costs incurred by the agency to provide system capacity to new users. Sewer connection fees in California are typically developed based on one of three common methodologies outlined by the American Water Works Association (AWWA) in its Manual of Water Supply Practices M1:
Principles of Water Rates, Fees and Charges, Seventh Edition. The three methodologies include:
1. Buy-In Method: The Buy-In Method establishes connection based on the value of the system’s existing capital assets and is typically most appropriate when a system’s current capacity is sufficient to serve both short-term and long-term projected demands. The rationale underlying the Buy-In Method is that new customers should pay to “buy-in” to existing system capacity funded by past and current users.
2. Incremental Cost Method: The Incremental Cost Method establishes connection fees based on the cost of planned capital expenditures required to expand system capacity and is typically most appropriate when a system’s current capacity is already fully utilized by existing users. The rationale underlying the Incremental Cost Method is that new users should fund planned capital projects that are necessary to accommodate growth.
3. Hybrid Method: The Hybrid Method6 establishes capacity charges based on a combination of the Buy-In Method and the Incremental Cost Method. The Hybrid Method is typically 6 The Hybrid Method is referred to by the AWWA as the “Combined Cost Approach.”
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
17 most appropriate when some existing capacity is available to new users, but capacity expansion is still necessary to accommodate long-term demands.
WRE recommends the Buy-In Method for the City’s sewer connection fees because the existing system has remaining capacity to serve new customers. Table 1-9 shows the sewer connection fee calculation based on the Buy-In Method. The proposed sewer connection fee per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) (Line 3) is calculated based on dividing the value of the existing system (Line 1) by existing EDUs (Line 2) and represents an increase of approximately 304.5% to the current sewer connection fees (Line 6).
Table 1-9: Sewer Connection Fee Calculation
Line Connection Fee Calculation Value
1 Existing System Value (Buy-In) $75,289,895
2 Existing EDUs 33,467
3 Proposed Connection Fee per EDU $2,250
4 Current Connection Fee per EDU $556.24
5 Difference ($) $1,693.76
6 Difference (%) 304.5%
1.13PROPOSED SEWER CONNECTION FEES
Table 1-10 shows the current and proposed sewer connection fees based on the results of the sewer connection fee study. Sewer connection fees are calculated for each customer by class by multiplying the connection fee per EDU (Table 1-9, Line 3) by the EDU ratio for each class. WRE recommends updating the Apartment and Mobile Home EDU ratio to match the Condominium EDU ratio in line with the proposed sewer rate structure changes.
Table 1-10: Proposed Sewer Connection Fees
Line Sewer Connection Fees EDU
Ratio Factor Current Fee
Proposed
Fee
Difference
($)
Difference
(%)
1 Single-Family Dwelling Unit 1.0000 per house/unit $556.24 $2,250.00 $1,693.76 304.5% 2 Townhome, Townhouse, Duet, Duplex 1.0000 per unit $556.24 $2,250.00 $1,693.76 304.5% 3 Auxiliary (Secondary) Dwelling Unit 0.0040 per square foot $2.22 $9.00 $6.78 305.4% 4 Condominium 0.7000 per unit $417.18 $1,575.00 $1,157.82 277.5% 5 Apartment, Mobile Home 0.7000 per unit $367.12 $1,575.00 $1,207.88 329.0% 6 Regular (low)
7 Auditoriums 0.0091 per seat $5.06 $20.48 $15.42 304.6% 8 Auto body shops/Auto dealers 0.0005 per square foot $0.28 $1.13 $0.85 301.8% 9 Banks, Financial Offices 0.0003 per square foot $0.16 $0.68 $0.52 321.9% 10 Barber shops / Beauty shops 0.0014 per square foot $0.76 $3.15 $2.39 314.5% 11 Bars, Cocktail lounges, taverns (w/o
dining) 0.0016 per square foot $0.89 $3.60 $2.71 304.5% 12 Bowling alleys 0.0014 per square foot $0.78 $3.15 $2.37 303.8% 13 Car washes 0.0077 per square foot $4.29 $17.33 $13.04 303.8%
City of Pleasanton
Sewer Rate Study Report
Water Resources Economics
18 Line Sewer Connection Fees EDU
Ratio Factor Current Fee
Proposed
Fee
Difference
($)
Difference
(%)
14 Churches 0.0227 per seat $12.64 $51.08 $38.44 304.1% 15 Delicatessen 0.0032 per square foot $1.79 $7.20 $5.41 302.2% 16 Dental Clinic 0.0041 per square foot $2.28 $9.23 $6.95 304.6% 17 Dry Cleaners 0.0020 per square foot $1.13 $4.50 $3.37 298.2% 18 Gas Stations 0.0021 per square foot $1.19 $4.73 $3.54 297.1% 19 General Retail/ Commercial 0.0002 per square foot $0.12 $0.45 $0.33 275.0% 20 Gyms, Health Clubs 0.0019 per square foot $1.06 $4.28 $3.22 303.3% 21 Hospital 1.1364 per bed $632.09 $2,556.90 $1,924.81 304.5% 22 Hotels, Motels (no dining facilities) 0.5909 per room $328.68 $1,329.53 $1,000.85 304.5% 23 Institutional (Resident) 0.4545 per bed $252.83 $1,022.63 $769.80 304.5% 24 Laundries, coin-operated 0.5909 per machine $328.68 $1,329.53 $1,000.85 304.5% 25 Laundries, full service (commercial) 0.0045 per square foot $2.53 $10.13 $7.60 300.2% 26 Market - Dry Goods 0.0009 per square foot $0.48 $2.03 $1.55 321.9% 27 Medical Clinic 0.0017 per square foot $0.93 $3.83 $2.90 311.3% 28 Medical/ Dental Complex 0.0010 per square foot $0.56 $2.25 $1.69 301.8% 29 Office Buildings 0.0002 per square foot $0.12 $0.45 $0.33 275.0% 30 Parks/ Rec
31 Country Club 0.3182 per person $176.98 $715.95 $538.97 304.5% 32 Picnic Park 0.0455 per person $25.29 $102.38 $77.09 304.8% 33 Pool 0.0455 per person $25.29 $102.38 $77.09 304.8%
34 Tennis Courts, w/ toilet & shower 0.4545 per court $252.83 $1,022.63 $769.80 304.5% 35 Plant Nursery 0.0004 per square foot $0.20 $0.90 $0.70 350.0% 36 Printers 0.0006 per square foot $0.36 $1.35 $0.99 275.0% 37 Public Agencies 0.0002 per square foot $0.12 $0.45 $0.33 275.0% 38 Recreational vehicle R.V. Park 0.5454 per RV $303.39 $1,227.15 $923.76 304.5% 39 Schools (excluding cafeteria)
40 W/o showers 0.0682 per student $37.92 $153.45 $115.53 304.7% 41 With showers 0.0909 per student $50.56 $204.53 $153.97 304.5% 42 Theaters 0.0091 per seat $5.06 $20.48 $15.42 304.6%
43 Veterinary Hospital 0.0015 per square foot $0.86 $3.38 $2.52 292.4% 44 Warehouse/distribution 0.0001 per square foot $0.08 $0.23 $0.15 181.3% 45 Regular (medium)
46 Banquet Facilities - intermittent use 0.0012 per square foot $0.68 $2.70 $2.02 297.1% 47 Business with cafeteria 0.0027 per square foot $1.51 $6.08 $4.57 302.3% 48 Cafeteria 0.0025 per square foot $1.37 $5.63 $4.26 310.6% 49 Hotels/Motels with dining facilities 0.0027 per square foot $1.51 $6.08 $4.57 302.3% 50 Restaurant, Fast Food 0.0027 per square foot $1.51 $6.08 $4.57 302.3% 51 Restaurant, Full Service 0.0025 per square foot $1.37 $5.63 $4.26 310.6% 52 School with cafeteria 0.0027 per square foot $1.51 $6.08 $4.57 302.3% 53 Regular (high)
54 Bakeries/ Donut Shops/ Ice Cream Shops 0.0028 per square foot $1.57 $6.30 $4.73 301.3% 55 Car washes w/ steam cleaning 0.0018 per square foot $1.01 $4.05 $3.04 301.0% 56 Markets with garbage disposals 0.0077 per square foot $4.29 $17.33 $13.04 303.8% 57 Mortuaries 0.0009 per square foot $0.48 $2.03 $1.55 321.9%