Agenda packet — Port Hueneme City Council, June 1, 2026 (part 7 of 7)

Scenario 18: 18 Opening Year With Project PM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 361 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.066
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 7.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 262 0 87 196 0 0
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 66 0 22 49 0 0
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 236 0 78 176 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 78 30 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 231 0 0 143 0 0
Name
Volumes
16 11/19/2025
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Scenario 18: 18 Opening Year With Project PM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 362 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 1.27
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 2.44 11.61
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 5.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 7.93 0.00 13.61 9.61 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
17 11/19/2025
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Scenario 18: 18 Opening Year With Project PM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 363 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Turning Movement Volume: Summary
Report File: C:\...\Opening Year With Project PM.pdf 11/19/2025 Vistro File: C:\...\250 S Surfside Dr - 11.19.2025 Second Scenario 18 Opening Year With Project PM Scenario.vistro
250 S Surfside Dr
490
Total
Volume
0 Right
0 Left
Westbound
176
Thru
78 Left
Southbound
0 Right
236
Thru
Northbound
5 Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
ID Intersection Name
561
Total
Volume
71 Right
30 Left
Westbound
224
Thru
0 Left
Southbound
0 Right
236
Thru
Northbound
4 Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1
ID Intersection Name
1748
Total
Volume
474
Right
142
Thru
52 Left
Westbound
11 Right
59 Thru
59 Left
Eastbound
66 Right
157
Thru
602
Left
Southbound
21 Right
95 Thru
10 Left
Northbound
3 Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura Rd
ID Intersection Name
1423
Total
Volume
5 Right
672
Thru
14 Left
Westbound
20 Right
652
Thru
8 Left
Eastbound
13 Right
0 Thru
19 Left
Southbound
13 Right
0 Thru
7 Left
Northbound
Port Hueneme Rd/Moranda
Pkwy-Willowbrook Dr 2
ID Intersection Name
1744
Total
Volume
6 Right
588
Thru
153
Left
Westbound
71 Right
602
Thru
7 Left
Eastbound
5 Right
0 Thru
5 Left
Southbound
153
Right
4 Thru
150
Left
Northbound
1 Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside Dr
ID Intersection Name
18 11/19/2025
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Scenario 18: 18 Opening Year With Project PM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 364 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 ILWU 46 Dispatch Hall
Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX E – CUMULATIVE PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 365 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 ILWU 46 Dispatch Hall
Traffic Impact Analysis
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 366 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 ILWU 46 Dispatch Hall
Traffic Impact Analysis
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 367 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 ILWU 46 Dispatch Hall
59 Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX F – TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 368 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 2: Port Hueneme Rd/Moranda Pkwy-Willowbrook Dr Hour Major Streets Minor Streets

E W N S
1 697 702 21 21
2 676 681 20 20
3 662 667 20 20
4 620 625 19 19
5 551 555 17 17
6 544 548 16 16
7 537 541 16 16
8 488 491 15 15
9 481 484 14 14
10 474 477 14 14
11 411 414 12 12
12 383 386 12 12
13 376 379 11 11
14 279 281 8 8
15 279 281 8 8
16 195 197 6 6
17 112 112 3 3
18 112 112 3 3
19 63 63 2 2
20 35 35 1 1
21 21 21 1 1
22 7 7 0 0
23 7 7 0 0
24 7 7 0 0
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Major Approaches E, W
Minor Approaches N, S
Speed > 40mph No
Population < 10,000 No
Warrant Factor 100%
Intersection Warrants Parameters
Warrant Name Met?
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume No
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume No
#3 Peak Hour No
Warrants Summary
1 12/3/2025
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Scenario 13: 13 Existing With Project AM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 369 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Orientation N S
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 29.3 16.1 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 1 1
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:10 0:05 Delay Condition Met No No
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 21 21
High Minor Volume Condition Met No No
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 1441 1441 Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant 3 Condition A
Hour Major Streets Minor Street Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Condition B
1 4 1399 1 21 No No No No No No No No No No
2 4 1357 1 20 No No No No No No No No No No
3 4 1329 1 20 No No No No No No No No No No
4 4 1245 1 19 No No No No No No No No No No
5 4 1106 1 17 No No No No No No No No No No
6 4 1092 1 16 No No No No No No No No No No
7 4 1078 1 16 No No No No No No No No No No
8 4 979 1 15 No No No No No No No No No No
9 4 965 1 14 No No No No No No No No No No
10 4 951 1 14 No No No No No No No No No No
11 4 825 1 12 No No No No No No No No No No
12 4 769 1 12 No No No No No No No No No No
13 4 755 1 11 No No No No No No No No No No
14 4 560 1 8 No No No No No No No No No No
15 4 560 1 8 No No No No No No No No No No
16 4 392 1 6 No No No No No No No No No No
17 4 224 1 3 No No No No No No No No No No
18 4 224 1 3 No No No No No No No No No No
19 4 126 1 2 No No No No No No No No No No
20 4 70 1 1 No No No No No No No No No No
21 4 42 1 1 No No No No No No No No No No
22 4 14 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
23 4 14 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
24 4 14 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
Hours
Met 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Warrant Analysis by Hour
2 12/3/2025
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Scenario 13: 13 Existing With Project AM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 370 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 2: Port Hueneme Rd/Moranda Pkwy-Willowbrook Dr Hour Major Streets Minor Streets

E W N S
1 637 663 19 20
2 618 643 18 19
3 605 630 18 19
4 567 590 17 18
5 503 524 15 16
6 497 517 15 16
7 490 511 15 15
8 446 464 13 14
9 440 457 13 14
10 433 451 13 14
11 376 391 11 12
12 350 365 10 11
13 344 358 10 11
14 255 265 8 8
15 255 265 8 8
16 178 186 5 6
17 102 106 3 3
18 102 106 3 3
19 57 60 2 2
20 32 33 1 1
21 19 20 1 1
22 6 7 0 0
23 6 7 0 0
24 6 7 0 0
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Major Approaches E, W
Minor Approaches N, S
Speed > 40mph No
Population < 10,000 No
Warrant Factor 100%
Intersection Warrants Parameters
Warrant Name Met?
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume No
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume No
#3 Peak Hour No
Warrants Summary
1 12/3/2025
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Scenario 14: 14 Existing With Project PM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 371 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Orientation N S
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 18 16.6 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 1 1
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:05 0:05 Delay Condition Met No No
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 19 20
High Minor Volume Condition Met No No
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 1339 1339 Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant 3 Condition A
Hour Major Streets Minor Street Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Condition B
1 4 1300 1 20 No No No No No No No No No No
2 4 1261 1 19 No No No No No No No No No No
3 4 1235 1 19 No No No No No No No No No No
4 4 1157 1 18 No No No No No No No No No No
5 4 1027 1 16 No No No No No No No No No No
6 4 1014 1 16 No No No No No No No No No No
7 4 1001 1 15 No No No No No No No No No No
8 4 910 1 14 No No No No No No No No No No
9 4 897 1 14 No No No No No No No No No No
10 4 884 1 14 No No No No No No No No No No
11 4 767 1 12 No No No No No No No No No No
12 4 715 1 11 No No No No No No No No No No
13 4 702 1 11 No No No No No No No No No No
14 4 520 1 8 No No No No No No No No No No
15 4 520 1 8 No No No No No No No No No No
16 4 364 1 6 No No No No No No No No No No
17 4 208 1 3 No No No No No No No No No No
18 4 208 1 3 No No No No No No No No No No
19 4 117 1 2 No No No No No No No No No No
20 4 65 1 1 No No No No No No No No No No
21 4 39 1 1 No No No No No No No No No No
22 4 13 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
23 4 13 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
24 4 13 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
Hours
Met 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Warrant Analysis by Hour
2 12/3/2025
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Scenario 14: 14 Existing With Project PM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 372 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 2: Port Hueneme Rd/Moranda Pkwy-Willowbrook Dr Hour Major Streets Minor Streets

Scenario 13: 13 Existing With Project AM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 373 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Orientation N S
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 29.3 16.1 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 1 1
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:10 0:05 Delay Condition Met No No
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 21 21
High Minor Volume Condition Met No No
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 1441 1441 Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant 3 Condition A
Hour Major Streets Minor Street Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Condition B
1 4 1399 1 21 No No No No No No No No No No
2 4 1357 1 20 No No No No No No No No No No
3 4 1329 1 20 No No No No No No No No No No
4 4 1245 1 19 No No No No No No No No No No
5 4 1106 1 17 No No No No No No No No No No
6 4 1092 1 16 No No No No No No No No No No
7 4 1078 1 16 No No No No No No No No No No
8 4 979 1 15 No No No No No No No No No No
9 4 965 1 14 No No No No No No No No No No
10 4 951 1 14 No No No No No No No No No No
11 4 825 1 12 No No No No No No No No No No
12 4 769 1 12 No No No No No No No No No No
13 4 755 1 11 No No No No No No No No No No
14 4 560 1 8 No No No No No No No No No No
15 4 560 1 8 No No No No No No No No No No
16 4 392 1 6 No No No No No No No No No No
17 4 224 1 3 No No No No No No No No No No
18 4 224 1 3 No No No No No No No No No No
19 4 126 1 2 No No No No No No No No No No
20 4 70 1 1 No No No No No No No No No No
21 4 42 1 1 No No No No No No No No No No
22 4 14 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
23 4 14 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
24 4 14 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
Hours
Met 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Warrant Analysis by Hour
2 12/3/2025
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Scenario 13: 13 Existing With Project AM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 374 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 2: Port Hueneme Rd/Moranda Pkwy-Willowbrook Dr Hour Major Streets Minor Streets

E W N S
1 678 663 19 20
2 658 643 18 19
3 644 630 18 19
4 603 590 17 18
5 536 524 15 16
6 529 517 15 16
7 522 511 15 15
8 475 464 13 14
9 468 457 13 14
10 461 451 13 14
11 400 391 11 12
12 373 365 10 11
13 366 358 10 11
14 271 265 8 8
15 271 265 8 8
16 190 186 5 6
17 108 106 3 3
18 108 106 3 3
19 61 60 2 2
20 34 33 1 1
21 20 20 1 1
22 7 7 0 0
23 7 7 0 0
24 7 7 0 0
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Major Approaches E, W
Minor Approaches N, S
Speed > 40mph No
Population < 10,000 No
Warrant Factor 100%
Intersection Warrants Parameters
Warrant Name Met?
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume No
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume No
#3 Peak Hour No
Warrants Summary
1 12/3/2025
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Scenario 14: 14 Existing With Project PM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 375 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Orientation N S
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 18.9 16.9 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 1 1
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:05 0:05 Delay Condition Met No No
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 19 20
High Minor Volume Condition Met No No
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 1380 1380 Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant 3 Condition A
Hour Major Streets Minor Street Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Condition B
1 4 1341 1 20 No No No No No No No No No No
2 4 1301 1 19 No No No No No No No No No No
3 4 1274 1 19 No No No No No No No No No No
4 4 1193 1 18 No No No No No No No No No No
5 4 1060 1 16 No No No No No No No No No No
6 4 1046 1 16 No No No No No No No No No No
7 4 1033 1 15 No No No No No No No No No No
8 4 939 1 14 No No No No No No No No No No
9 4 925 1 14 No No No No No No No No No No
10 4 912 1 14 No No No No No No No No No No
11 4 791 1 12 No No No No No No No No No No
12 4 738 1 11 No No No No No No No No No No
13 4 724 1 11 No No No No No No No No No No
14 4 536 1 8 No No No No No No No No No No
15 4 536 1 8 No No No No No No No No No No
16 4 376 1 6 No No No No No No No No No No
17 4 214 1 3 No No No No No No No No No No
18 4 214 1 3 No No No No No No No No No No
19 4 121 1 2 No No No No No No No No No No
20 4 67 1 1 No No No No No No No No No No
21 4 40 1 1 No No No No No No No No No No
22 4 14 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
23 4 14 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
24 4 14 1 0 No No No No No No No No No No
Hours
Met 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Warrant Analysis by Hour
2 12/3/2025
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Scenario 14: 14 Existing With Project PM
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 376 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 ILWU 46 Dispatch Hall
60 Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX G – 5-YEAR TRAFFIC COLLISION DATA
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 377 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Intersection: Port Hueneme/Surfside
CASE_ID ACCIDENT_YEARPROC_DATE JURIS COLLISION_DATECOLLISION_TIMEOFFICER_ID REPORTING_DISTRICT DAY_OF_WEEKCHP_SHIFT POPULATION CNTY_CITY_LOCSPECIAL_CONDBEAT_TYPE CHP_BEAT_TYPECITY_DIVISION_LAPD CH_BEAT_CLASS BEAT_NUMBERPRIMARY_RD SECONDARY_RDDISTANCE DIRECTION INTERSECTIONWEATHER_1 WEATHER_2 STATE_HWY_INDCALTRANS_COUNTY CALTRANS_DISTRICT STATE_ROUTE ROUTE_SUFFIXPOSTMILE_PREFIX POSTMILE LOCATION_TYPERAMP_INTERSECTION SIDE_OF_HWY TOW_AWAY COLLISION_SEVERITY NUMBER_KILLEDNUMBER_INJURED PARTY_COUNTPRIMARY_COLL_FACTOR PCF_CODE_OF_VIOL PCF_VIOL_CATEGORY PCF_VIOLATIONPCF_VIOL_SUBSECTION HIT_AND_RUN TYPE_OF_COLLISION MVIW PED_ACTION ROAD_SURFACEROAD_COND_1ROAD_COND_2LIGHTING CONTROL_DEVICE CHP_ROAD_TYPEDESTRIAN_ACCIDENT BICYCLE_ACCIDENT MOTORCYCLE_ACCIDENT TRUCK_ACCIDENT NOT_PRIVATE_PROPERTY ALCOHOL_INVOLVED STWD_VEHTYPE_AT_FAULT CHP_VEHTYPE_AT_FAULT COUNT_SEVERE_INJ COUNT_VISIBLE_INJ COUNT_COMPLAINT_PAIN COUNT_PED_KILLED COUNT_PED_INJURED COUNT_BICYCLIST_KILLED COUNT_BICYCLIST_INJURED COUNT_MC_KILLED COUNT_MC_INJURED PRIMARY_RAMPSECONDARY_RAMP LATITUDE LONGITUDE COUNTY CITY POINT_X POINT_Y 9265617 2020 6/2/2021 5605 9/6/2020 1736 218 PATRO 7 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 3 EAST PORT HUENEME RD NORTH SURFSIDE RD 0 Y A - N Y 3 0 1 2 A - 9 21801 A N D C A A H - A A 0 Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - VENTURA PORT HUENEME -119.19046 34.147598279307402 2021 10/27/2021 5605 8/2/2021 1252 24 PATRO 1 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 3 E SURFSIDE DRN SURFSIDE DR 40 W N A - N Y 3 0 2 2 A - 3 22350 N C E A A H - A D 0 Y Y C 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 - - VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.190453 34.14755249 9509859 2022 12/15/2022 5605 11/17/2022 1423 100 PATRO 4 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 3 SURFSIDE DR PORT HUENEME RD 21 S N A - N N 3 0 1 2 A - 9 21801 A N D G A A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - 34.14722824 -119.190666 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.190491 34.147598279593856 2023 7/18/2023 5605 6/21/2023 1004 119 PATRO 3 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 3 PORT HUENEME RD SURFSIDE DR 50 E N A - N Y 4 0 1 2 A - 8 22107 N C C A A H - A A 0 Y A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 34.14355087 -119.195534 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.190323 34.147598279620797 2023 10/23/2023 5605 9/26/2023 724 227 PATRO 2 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 4 PORT HUENEME RD SURFSIDE DR 0 Y A - N Y 3 0 2 2 D - 0 N D C A A H - A A 0 Y - - 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 34.14722824 -119.190666 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.190491 34.147602089675225 2024 4/11/2024 5605 2/28/2024 903 230 PATRO 3 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 2 PORT HUENEME RD SURFSIDE DR 10 W N A - N 3 0 1 2 A - 17 21451 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y D 22 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - 34.14355087 -119.195534 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.190521 34.147602089685709 2023 6/19/2024 5605 3/16/2023 1252 147 PATRO 4 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 3 PORT HUENEME RD SURFSIDE DR 0 Y A - N Y 2 0 1 2 A - 9 21801 A N D C A A H - A A 0 Y Y D 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 34.14722824 -119.190666 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.190491 34.147602089755859 2024 11/26/2024 5605 5/6/2024 1221 230 PATRO 1 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 3 PORT HUENEME RD SURFSIDE DR 0 Y A - N Y 2 0 1 2 A - 3 22350 N D C A A H - A A 0 Y Y C 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - - 34.14300156 -119.195 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.190491 34.147602089767217 2025 4/10/2025 5605 2/8/2025 1724 246 PATRO 6 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 4 PORT HUENEME RD SURFSIDE DR 0 Y A - N Y 4 0 1 2 A - 17 21451 A N A C A A H - A A 0 Y D 22 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 34.14355087 -119.195534 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.190491 34.147602089824357 2024 1/3/2025 5605 12/3/2024 746 224 PATRO 2 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 4 PORT HUENEME RD SURFSIDE DR 0 Y B - N Y 4 0 1 2 A - 17 21451 A N D C A A H - A A 0 Y A 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 34.14355087 -119.195534 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.190491 34.14760208 Intersection: Port Hueneme/WillowbrookCASE_ID ACCIDENT_YEARPROC_DATE JURIS COLLISION_DATECOLLISION_TIMEOFFICER_ID REPORTING_DISTRICT DAY_OF_WEEKCHP_SHIFT POPULATION CNTY_CITY_LOCSPECIAL_CONDBEAT_TYPE CHP_BEAT_TYPECITY_DIVISION_LAPD CH_BEAT_CLASS BEAT_NUMBERPRIMARY_RD SECONDARY_RDDISTANCE DIRECTION INTERSECTIONWEATHER_1 WEATHER_2 STATE_HWY_INDCALTRANS_COUNTY CALTRANS_DISTRICT STATE_ROUTE ROUTE_SUFFIXPOSTMILE_PREFIX POSTMILE LOCATION_TYPERAMP_INTERSECTION SIDE_OF_HWY TOW_AWAY COLLISION_SEVERITY NUMBER_KILLEDNUMBER_INJURED PARTY_COUNTPRIMARY_COLL_FACTOR PCF_CODE_OF_VIOL PCF_VIOL_CATEGORY PCF_VIOLATIONPCF_VIOL_SUBSECTION HIT_AND_RUN TYPE_OF_COLLISION MVIW PED_ACTION ROAD_SURFACEROAD_COND_1ROAD_COND_2LIGHTING CONTROL_DEVICE CHP_ROAD_TYPEDESTRIAN_ACCIDENT BICYCLE_ACCIDENT MOTORCYCLE_ACCIDENT TRUCK_ACCIDENT NOT_PRIVATE_PROPERTY ALCOHOL_INVOLVED STWD_VEHTYPE_AT_FAULT CHP_VEHTYPE_AT_FAULT COUNT_SEVERE_INJ COUNT_VISIBLE_INJ COUNT_COMPLAINT_PAIN COUNT_PED_KILLED COUNT_PED_INJURED COUNT_BICYCLIST_KILLED COUNT_BICYCLIST_INJURED COUNT_MC_KILLED COUNT_MC_INJURED PRIMARY_RAMPSECONDARY_RAMP LATITUDE LONGITUDE COUNTY CITY POINT_X POINT_Y 9265355 2020 5/25/2021 5605 10/12/2020 720 147 1 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 PORT HUENEME RD MORANDA PKWY 0 Y A - N N 3 0 2 2 A - 9 21802 A N D C A A H - A A 0 Y A 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 34.1436615 -119.19738 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.192329 34.14770126 9395545 2022 1/28/2022 5605 1/15/2022 347 220 PATRO 6 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 3 PORT HUENEME RD WILLOWBROOK DR 0 Y A - N 4 0 1 1 A - 8 22107 N E I A A H - C D 0 Y A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.192329 34.14770126 Intersection: Port Hueneme/VenturaCASE_ID ACCIDENT_YEARPROC_DATE JURIS COLLISION_DATECOLLISION_TIMEOFFICER_ID REPORTING_DISTRICT DAY_OF_WEEKCHP_SHIFT POPULATION CNTY_CITY_LOCSPECIAL_CONDBEAT_TYPE CHP_BEAT_TYPECITY_DIVISION_LAPD CH_BEAT_CLASS BEAT_NUMBERPRIMARY_RD SECONDARY_RDDISTANCE DIRECTION INTERSECTIONWEATHER_1 WEATHER_2 STATE_HWY_INDCALTRANS_COUNTY CALTRANS_DISTRICT STATE_ROUTE ROUTE_SUFFIXPOSTMILE_PREFIX POSTMILE LOCATION_TYPERAMP_INTERSECTION SIDE_OF_HWY TOW_AWAY COLLISION_SEVERITY NUMBER_KILLEDNUMBER_INJURED PARTY_COUNTPRIMARY_COLL_FACTOR PCF_CODE_OF_VIOL PCF_VIOL_CATEGORY PCF_VIOLATIONPCF_VIOL_SUBSECTION HIT_AND_RUN TYPE_OF_COLLISION MVIW PED_ACTION ROAD_SURFACEROAD_COND_1ROAD_COND_2LIGHTING CONTROL_DEVICE CHP_ROAD_TYPEDESTRIAN_ACCIDENT BICYCLE_ACCIDENT MOTORCYCLE_ACCIDENT TRUCK_ACCIDENT NOT_PRIVATE_PROPERTY ALCOHOL_INVOLVED STWD_VEHTYPE_AT_FAULT CHP_VEHTYPE_AT_FAULT COUNT_SEVERE_INJ COUNT_VISIBLE_INJ COUNT_COMPLAINT_PAIN COUNT_PED_KILLED COUNT_PED_INJURED COUNT_BICYCLIST_KILLED COUNT_BICYCLIST_INJURED COUNT_MC_KILLED COUNT_MC_INJURED PRIMARY_RAMPSECONDARY_RAMP LATITUDE LONGITUDE COUNTY CITY POINT_X POINT_Y 9268006 2021 5/26/2021 5605 2/21/2021 1835 218 PATRO 7 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 3 PORT HUENEME RD VENTURA RD 0 Y A - Y 4 0 1 2 A - 12 21453 A N D C A A H - C A 0 Y A 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 34.14780045 -119.195473 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.195587 34.14777374 9274891 2021 7/9/2021 5605 6/12/2021 703 220 PATRO 6 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 3 VENTURA RD PORT HUENEME RD 10 N N A - N 4 0 1 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - 34.14780045 -119.195473 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.195587 34.147769939473684 2022 8/18/2022 5605 7/26/2022 1640 231 PATRO 2 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 3 VENTURA RD PORT HUENEME RD 223 N N A - N N 4 0 1 2 A - 5 21650 1 N D G A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - 34.14780045 -119.195473 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.195587 34.147769939620795 2023 10/23/2023 5605 9/17/2023 2208 239 PATRO 7 5 3 5605 0 0 0 0 1 PORT HUENEME RD VENTURA RD 0 Y A - N Y 3 0 2 2 A - 17 21451 A N A C A A H - C A 0 Y A 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 34.14780045 -119.195473 VENTURA PORT HUENEME-119.195587 34.14777374 Agenda Item No. 07 Page 378 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 ILWU 46 Dispatch Hall
61 Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX H – VISTRO SOFTWARE METHODOLOGY
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 379 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 ILWU 46 Dispatch Hall
62 Traffic Impact Analysis
The PTV Vistro program is a traffic operations and analysis software developed by PTV Group that is widely used for intersection capacity analysis, signal optimization, and level of service (LOS) evaluation. Its methodology is built around the analytical procedures defined by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)— primarily the HCM 6th Edition (2016) and updates from HCM 7th Edition (2022). In general, Vistro provides an integrated, data-driven environment where users can model intersection performance, evaluate congestion levels, and test geometric or control improvements.

LOS is determined in Vistro as follows:

1. Analytical Foundation
Vistro’s computations are based on deterministic analytical models from the HCM for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. This means that for each movement or approach, the software uses equations that relate traffic volume, capacity, and delay to determine operational performance measures such as average control delay, queue length, and volume-to-capacity ratio (v/c).

For signalized intersections, Vistro applies the HCM signalized intersection analysis method, which estimates average control delay per vehicle by considering factors like:
• Arrival type and progression (coordination effects)
• Cycle length and green splits
• Saturation flow rates and lane geometry
• Start-up lost time and clearance lost time
• The resulting delay is converted to a Level of Service (A–F) using the standard HCM delay thresholds.

For unsignalized intersections (two-way stop-controlled or all-way stop-controlled), Vistro uses gapacceptance models to determine movement capacities and average delays. It evaluates the interactions between conflicting traffic streams, the availability of acceptable gaps, and driver behavior to estimate LOS for each minor movement and the overall intersection.

2. Input Data and Model Setup
• Traffic volumes (turning movements)
• Lane geometry (number and width of lanes, storage lengths, etc.) • Signal timing plans (phasing, cycle length, offsets)
• Control types (signalized, TWSC, AWSC, or roundabout) • Peak hour factors and heavy vehicle percentages
Vistro then uses this data to create a network model of intersections and links, allowing simultaneous analysis of multiple connected intersections rather than isolated nodes.

3. Capacity, Delay, and LOS Calculations
Vistro follows a step-by-step computational process:

1. Determine saturation flow rate for each movement based on geometry and adjustment factors.

Agenda Item No. 07 Page 380 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 ILWU 46 Dispatch Hall
63 Traffic Impact Analysis

2. Calculate capacity using the effective green time and cycle length (for signals) or gap acceptance (for unsignalized).

3. Estimate control delay using the HCM delay equations, incorporating random arrivals, queue spillback effects, and residual queues.

4. Compute LOS by comparing the calculated delay to the HCM LOS thresholds:
o A: ≤10 sec/veh
o B: >10–20 sec/veh
o C: >20–35 sec/veh
o D: >35–55 sec/veh
o E: >55–80 sec/veh
o F: >80 sec/veh
Vistro also computes queue lengths, volume-to-capacity ratios, and 95th percentile delays, giving engineers a complete picture of intersection performance.

4. Optimization and Scenario Testing
Vistro’s model includes optimization tools that can automatically adjust signal timing, cycle length, and offsets to improve overall network performance. Engineers can create multiple scenarios (existing, no-build, build alternatives) and directly compare LOS, delays, and queue metrics to evaluate improvement options.

5. Integration and Output
Vistro integrates with other PTV tools—such as Vissim (microsimulation) and Visum (macroscopic modeling)— for a seamless transition from planning-level analysis to detailed simulation. It produces reports and graphics showing intersection diagrams, LOS summaries, and time-space diagrams that align with HCM reporting standards.

Summary
In short, PTV Vistro’s LOS analysis methodology is a deterministic, HCM-based analytical model that estimates intersection performance using capacity, control delay, and LOS relationships. It allows transportation engineers to evaluate existing operations, test improvement alternatives, and optimize signal timing plans efficiently. By adhering closely to HCM principles, Vistro ensures that its LOS results are consistent with accepted U.S. traffic engineering standards and are suitable for use in traffic impact studies, corridor planning, and safety improvement evaluations.

Agenda Item No. 07 Page 381 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 ILWU 46 Dispatch Hall
64 Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX I – EXISTING SITE GENERATED/REMOVED TRIPS AND SITE

RELOCATION NET GENERATED TRIPS
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 382 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Existing Site Trips AM (1st Scenario)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 383 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Existing Site Removed Trips AM (1st Sn)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 384 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Relocation Net Trips AM (1st Sn)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 385 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Existing Site Trips PM (1st Scenario)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 386 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Existing Site Removed Trips PM (1st Sn)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 387 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Relocation Net Trips PM (1st Sn)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 388 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Existing Site Trips AM (2nd Scenario)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 389 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Existing Site Removed Trips AM (2nd Sn)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 390 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Relocation Net Trips AM (2nd Sn)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 391 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Existing Site Trips PM (2nd Scenario)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 392 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Existing Site Removed Trips PM (2nd Sn)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 393 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 2
Port Hueneme Rd/Surfside DPort Hueneme Rd/Moranda P Port Hueneme Rd/Ventura R Surfside Dr/Project Dwy 1 1 1/13/2026
EPD Solutions, Inc.

Relocation Net Trips PM (2nd Sn)
250 S Surfside Dr
Version 2024 (SP 0-4)
Generated with
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 394 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

CITY OF PORT HUENEME NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Port Hueneme on Monday, June 1, 2026, at 6:30 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 250 North Ventura Road, Port Hueneme, California, 93041, to consider an application submitted by the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA), on behalf of International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Local 46, for a Development Permit No.

PHPD-25-2 and Coastal Development Permit for the redevelopment and adaptive reuse of the property located at 250 South Surfside Drive, Port Hueneme, California (APN No. 207-0-260- 425), within the Coastal Zone and California Coastal Commission appeal jurisdiction.

The proposed project would establish a maritime dispatch hall and staffing office to support longshore operations, including administrative offices and periodic workforce training, through the relocation of the existing ILWU Local 46 Dispatch Hall from the secured Port of Hueneme facility at 341 West Port Hueneme Road to the subject property, approximately 0.9 roadway miles east.

The Project consists of improvements to an existing developed industrial site, including demolition of four small accessory structures, interior and exterior remodeling of three existing buildings, parking lot reconfiguration, landscaping, fencing, and lighting upgrades. Peak activity would occur during shift changes and training sessions, with adequate on-site parking provided.

Any action taken by the City on the Coastal Development Permit is subject to appeal to the California Coastal Commission in accordance with the provisions of the California Coastal Act and the City’s Local Coastal Program.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The proposed Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit have been evaluated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined to be categorically exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development Projects). The Project involves the redevelopment of an existing developed industrial site within an urbanized area and is consistent with the applicable General Plan and zoning regulations. The Project site is adequately served by existing utilities and public services, and supporting technical studies demonstrate that the Project would not result in significant impacts related to traffic, circulation, or Vehicle Miles Traveled. The Project site is not located on a designated scenic highway, is not listed as a hazardous waste site, and does not contain known historic resources.

Furthermore, the Project does not involve unusual circumstances, would not contribute to cumulative impacts, and will not result in significant environmental effects. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for a Class 32 categorical exemption, and none of the exceptions outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply.

If approved, the Coastal Development Permit action is not final until the expiration of the Coastal Commission appeal period. Any aggrieved person or two members of the Coastal Commission may appeal the City’s decision to the California Coastal Commission within the applicable appeal period following the City’s final action.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION on this project may be obtained from the Department of Community Development, City of Port Hueneme, 250 N. Ventura Road, Port Hueneme, California 93041, telephone (805) 986-6548.

If you challenge this action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.

For ADA accommodations, contact the City Clerk’s Office at (805) 986-6503 or the California TDD Relay Service at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
/s/Georgianna Nicole Alvarez, City Clerk
Published: May 22, 2026
Attachment E
Agenda Item No. 07 Page 395 of 395 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 DATE: June 1, 2026
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: James Vega, City Manager
Fred Camarillo, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-1, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1, AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-3
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Port Hueneme, California, Declaring its Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments for the Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 87-1 for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2026, and Ending June 30, 2027;

2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Port Hueneme, California, Declaring its Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments for the Parkway and Median Assessment District No. 91-1 for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2026, and Ending June 30, 2027; and

3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Port Hueneme, California, Declaring its Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments for the Port Hueneme Drainage Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-3 for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2026, and Ending June 30, 2027.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:

The City of Port Hueneme (City) formed its Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 87-1 (District 87-1) in 1988 for the purpose of maintaining and servicing public lighting facilities located within the public right-of-way boundaries of the City. The Parkway and Median Assessment District No. 91-1 (District 91-1) was formed by the City in 1991 for the purpose of installing and maintaining public landscaping in the parkways and medians in the public rights-of-way within the City. In 1995, the City formed the Port Hueneme Drainage Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-3 (District 95-3) for the purpose of maintaining City parks. In 1997, this latter District was renamed the Port Hueneme Drainage Maintenance Assessment District and the description of maintenance and improvements was modified to conform to the requirements of Proposition (Prop.) 218.

Agenda Item No. 08 Page 1 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
Annual Assessments
June 1, 2026

Page 2 ends

The Resolutions presented for consideration initiate the proceedings for levying the assessments, defining the work to be completed, and preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Reports for District 87-1, District 91-1, and District 95-3 (Districts). The Resolutions set the time and place for the required public hearings as June 15, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. The public hearings provide an opportunity to review the Districts’ capital, maintenance, and operational costs as presented in the Engineer’s Reports; to receive and consider any protests to the work or assessments; and to set the annual assessments on properties within the Districts.

The Engineer’s Reports describe the improvements, maintenance, and assessment methodology relating to each District. Due to the requirements of Prop. 218 relative to increased assessments, the 2026-2027 Engineer’s Reports have been prepared using the same assessment calculation methodology since 1995. The contemplated work for 2026-2027 relates exclusively to improvements and maintenance thereof that are intended to qualify for the capital costs, maintenance, and operations exemption (one of the grandfather exemptions) set forth in Proposition 218.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funding for the proposed maintenance and improvement expenses will be provided by the assessment charges proposed in the Engineer’s Reports and will be levied against those properties receiving a special benefit from the services provided.

The estimated revenue for Drainage Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-3 is $185,050, with an estimated expense of $223,606. This district will have an estimated deficit of $38,556 that will decrease the Drainage Maintenance Assessment District fund balance. This district has an estimated accumulated beginning fund balance of $647,357; however, work to clear the Bubbling Spring Channel remains active and will continue to draw on the accumulated fund balance through multiple years. The funds will cover environmental studies, permitting fees and monitoring of the contract for the reed removal in the Bubbling Springs drainage canal (Bubbling Springs Lake and Streambed Alteration Project). The estimated ending fund balance for FY 2026-2027 for District No. 95-3 is estimated to be $608,801.

The estimated revenue for Parkway and Median Maintenance Assessment District No. 91-1 is $176,060, with an estimated expense of $388,724. This district will have an estimated deficit of $212,664 that will be funded through the Parkway and Median Maintenance Assessment District fund balance. This district has an estimated accumulative beginning fund balance of $383,267. The estimated ending fund balance for FY 2026-2027 for District No. 91-1 is estimated to be $170,603.

The estimated revenue for Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 87-1 is $122,244, with an estimated expense of $185,000, requiring a $62,756 transfer from the General Fund due to increasing electricity costs subsidizes this district to cover the deficit.

Therefore, the estimated ending fund balance for FY 2026-2027 for District No. 87-1 is estimated to be $0.

Agenda Item No. 08 Page 2 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
Annual Assessments
June 1, 2026

Page 3 ends

Over the last year, the City has prioritized reviewing and analyzing utility rates which have not been adjusted in many years. As that is completed in coming months, staff will then analyze and make recommendations regarding options to address the deficit and/or subsidy in both the Lighting and Parkway/Median Maintenance District as costs continue to increase to perform the work and/or provide electrical services. For example, Staff has identified a potential adjustment in the Lighting District that may reduce this expense, and will be working with SCE in coming months to investigate.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Primary Strategic Pillar(s) and Initiative(s):

Optimal Levels of Service for Residents and Businesses
• Promote operational excellence in all City functions and embody best practices as a municipality
• Establish desired service levels for all City functions Safe, Secure, & Beautiful Community
• Upgrade our beach, parks, City-owned facilities and structures to provide a better experience for our residents, employees, commuters, and visitors ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution District No. 87-1
B. Resolution District No. 91-1
C. Resolution District No. 95-3
D. Engineer’s Report District No. 87-1
E. Engineer’s Report District No. 91-1
F. Engineer’s Report District No. 95-3
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 3 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 4 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT HUENEME,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR AND DECLARING ITS

INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2026, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2027 WHEREAS, on June 15, 1988, the City Council (Council) of the City of Port Hueneme (City) adopted Resolution No. 2396 ordering the formation of the Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 87-1 (District) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Act), being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience require the city to initiate proceedings for the levy of annual assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 for the purposes provided thereon in the Act and in Resolution No. 2396; and WHEREAS, Section 22622 of the Act requires the City to adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements or any substantial changes in the existing improvements and ordering the Engineer to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 of the Act; and
WHERAS, a draft Engineer’s Report has been prepared and filed with the City Clerk in accordance with Article 4 of the Act and all interested persons are referred to the Engineer’s Report for a full and detailed description of the boundaries of the District, the work and the proposed assessments upon the assessable lots and parcels of land within the District; and WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Report has been presented to the Council and the Council has duly considered each and every part of the Engineer’s Report.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT HUENEME, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2: The public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the Council of the City to levy and collect assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year 2026-27.

SECTION 3: The land within the District will be benefited by the work described in the Engineer’s Report. The District includes all of the lands so benefited and the amount to be assessed is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the reasonable costs among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefit to be received from the work.

SECTION 4: The foregoing described work is to be located within streets and easements within the City of Port Hueneme particularly described on a map on file in the office of the City Clerk entitled “Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 87-1.” SECTION 5: The proposed assessment of the Fiscal Year 2026-27 shall not be increased from the previous year but shall remain at the same level as the assessments for the Fiscal Year 2025-

26. The proposed assessments are the same or lower than the assessment levied within the District in any previous year.

Agenda Item No. 08 Page 5 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT A
CC Resolution No. ___, Page 2 of 3
SECTION 6: The contemplated work, in the opinion of the Council, is of benefit to all the land within the District and the Council hereby makes the expense of said work chargeable upon the District.

SECTION 7: The Council hereby finds that each and every part of the Engineer’s Report is sufficient and the Council hereby preliminarily approves, passes on and adopts the Engineer’s Report as submitted to the Council and filed with the City Clerk. The report shall stand as the Engineer’s Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings pursuant to this Resolution of Intention.

SECTION 8: Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 15 th day of June 2026,
at the hour of 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, 250 North Ventura Road, Port Hueneme, California, any and all persons having objections to the proposed work may appear and show cause why said levy or assessment should not be approved in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. The Council shall consider all oral and written protests. Written protests must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing and shall state all grounds of objection and a description sufficient to identify the property.

SECTION 9: The City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of such public hearing by causing to be published a copy of this Resolution once in a newspaper of general circulation for the City of Port Hueneme at least 10 days prior to the date set for public hearing.

SECTION 10: All Work proposed shall be done in accordance with the Act.

SECTION 11: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

SECTION 12: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this 1
st day of June, 2026.

Martha McQueen-Legohn, Mayor
ATTEST:

Georgianna Nicole Alvarez
City Clerk
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 6 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT A
CC Resolution No. ___, Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.

CITY OF PORT HUENEME )
I, Georgianna Nicole Alvarez, City Clerk of the City of Port Hueneme, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ____ was duly adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of ____, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Dated:

Georgianna Nicole Alvarez
City Clerk
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 7 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 8 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT B
RESOLUTION NO. ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT HUENEME,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR AND DECLARING ITS

INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE PARKWAY AND MEDIAN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2026, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2027 WHEREAS, on July 17, 1991, the City Council (Council) of the City of Port Hueneme (City) adopted Resolution No. 2590 ordering the formation of the Parkway and Median Maintenance Assessment District No. 91-1 (District) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Act) being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience require the City to initiate proceedings for the levy of annual assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for the purposes provided thereon in the Act and in Resolution No. 2590; and WHEREAS, Section 22622 of the Act requires the City to adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements or any substantial changes in the existing improvements and ordering the Engineer to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, a draft Engineer’s Report has been prepared and filed with the City Clerk in accordance with Article 4 of the Act and all interested persons are referred to the Engineer’s Report for a full and detailed description of the boundaries of the District, the work and the proposed assessments upon the assessable lots and parcels of land within the District; and WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Report has been presented to the Council and the Council has duly considered each and every part of the Engineer’s Report.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT HUENEME, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS;
SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2: The public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the Council of the City to levy and collect assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year 2026-27.

SECTION 5: The proposed assessment for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 shall not be increased from the previous year but shall remain at the same level as the assessments for the Fiscal Year 2025-

26. The proposed assessments are the same or lower than the assessment levied within the District in any previous year.

Agenda Item No. 08 Page 9 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT B
CC Resolution No. ___, Page 2 of 3
SECTION 6: The contemplated work, in the opinion of the Council, is of benefit to all the land within the District and the Council hereby makes the expense of said work chargeable upon the District.

SECTION 9: The Council is hereby directed to give notice of such public hearing by causing to be published a copy of this Resolution once in a newspaper of general circulation for the City at least 10 days prior to the date set for public hearing.

SECTION 10: All Work proposed shall be done in accordance with the Act.

SECTION 11: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

SECTION 12: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this 1
st day of June, 2026.

Martha McQueen-Legohn, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Georgianna Nicole Alvarez
City Clerk
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 10 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT B
CC Resolution No. ___, Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Dated:

Georgianna Nicole Alvarez
City Clerk
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 11 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 12 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT C
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT HUENEME,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR AND DECLARING ITS

INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE PORT HUENEME DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 95-3 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2026, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2027
WHEREAS, on March 15, 1995, the City Council of the City of Port Hueneme (City) adopted Resolution No. 2865 initiating proceedings for the formation of the Port Hueneme Park Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-3 (District) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Act), being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, which District was renamed on May 7, 1997, pursuant to Resolution No. 3020, the Port Hueneme Drainage Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-3; and WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience require the City to initiate proceedings for the levy of annual assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 for the purposes provided thereon in the Act and in Resolution No. 2865; and WHEREAS, Section 22622 of the Act requires the City to adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements or any substantial changes in the existing improvements and ordering the Engineer to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, a draft Engineer’s Report has been prepared and filed with the City Clerk in accordance with Article 4 of the Act (Engineer’s Report) and all interested persons are referred to the Engineer’s Report for a full and detailed description of the boundaries of the District, the work and the proposed assessments upon the assessable lots and parcels of land within the District; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Report has been presented to the City Council and the City Council has duly considered each and every part of the Engineer’s Report.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT HUENEME, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2: The public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Council of the City to levy and collect assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year 2026-27.

SECTION 5: The proposed assessment of the Fiscal Year 2026-27 shall not be increased from the previous year but shall remain at the same level as the assessments for the Fiscal Year 2025- Agenda Item No. 08 Page 13 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT C
CC Resolution No. ___, Page 2 of 3

26. The proposed assessments are the same or lower than the assessment levied within the District in any previous year.

SECTION 6: The contemplated work, in the opinion of the City Council, is of benefit to all the land within the District and the City Council hereby makes the expense of said work chargeable upon the District.

SECTION 7: The City Council hereby finds that each and every part of the Engineer’s Report is sufficient and the City Council hereby preliminarily approves, passes on and adopts the Engineer’s Report as submitted to the City Council and filed with the City Clerk. The report shall stand as the Engineer’s Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings pursuant to this Resolution of Intention.

SECTION 8: Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 15th day of June 2026, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, 250 North Ventura Road, Port Hueneme, California, any and all persons having objections to the proposed work, may appear and show cause why said levy or assessment should not be approved in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. The City Council shall consider all oral and written protests. Written protests must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing and shall state all grounds of objection and a description sufficient to identify the property.

SECTION 10: All Work proposed shall be done in accordance with the Act.

SECTION 11: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

SECTION 12: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the bool of original Resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this 1
st day of June, 2026
Martha McQueen-Legohn, Mayor
ATTEST:

Georgianna Nicole Alvarez
City Clerk
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 14 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT C
CC Resolution No. ___, Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Dated:

Georgianna Nicole Alvarez
City Clerk
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 15 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 16 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT D

CITY OF PORT HUENEME
Engineer's Report

LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-1
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
For Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 17 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Preface.......................................................................................................1 Description of Improvements......................................................................1 Assessment Roll ........................................................................................2 Method and Formula of Assessment..........................................................2 Cost and Revenue Estimates.....................................................................4 Appendix A - Apportionment Formula .................................................... A-1 Appendix B - Budget 2026-27 ................................................................ B-1 Appendix C - Assessment Diagram ....................................................... C-1 Appendix D - Assessment Roll............................................................... D-1 Appendix E - Resolutions ....................................................................... E-1 Agenda Item No. 08 Page 18 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
1 CITY OF PORT HUENEME
Engineer's Report
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-1
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
For Fiscal Year 2026-2027

PREFACE
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Proposition 218 as stated in Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution, and Chapters 1 and 4 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

This Assessment District, by special benefit assessments, will provide funding for the electrical energy for and the operation and maintenance of public lighting facilities within street right-of-way within the City of Port Hueneme. The items funded by the District are exempt from the procedural and approval requirements set forth in Section 5(a) of Article XIIID that states:
... assessments existing on the effective date of this Article shall be exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 [if they were] imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control. " As discussed herein, the improvements funded by the Assessment District for fiscal year 2026-27 are pre-existing and the assessments are used to fund the maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks and streets. Therefore, the Assessment District is exempt from the procedural and approval requirements of Article XIIID.

DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS
This report covers the levy of assessments for the period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. An updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs, future improvements, and changes in parcelization.

Since formation of the Lighting Maintenance Assessment District in 1987, assessments have been used exclusively for maintenance and servicing of public lighting facilities owned by either the City or Southern California Edison (S.C.E.) and located within public right-of-way within the boundaries of the City.

Lighting maintenance for FY 2026-27 includes removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances to public lighting facilities within street right-ofway. Servicing of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the California Streets and Highways Code to include the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agents to public street lighting facilities, furnished by the Southern California Edison Company or its successors or this servicing shall be as authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California. Plans and specifications concerning the street lighting provided for in this district are on file in the City Engineer's Office and at Southern California Edison offices.

Agenda Item No. 08 Page 19 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
2 For the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2026, the scope of improvements will encompass the following:

Maintenance and Servicing.

1. Street ROW Lighting. Maintenance/servicing of all public lighting facilities within the public street right-of-way, including but not limited to streetlights and traffic signal safety lighting.

2. lncidental Expenses. Administrative costs and expenses incidental to maintenance, servicing, construction, and installation of public lighting facilities, including but not limited to lighting surveys, engineering costs, and general overhead.

Replacement, Installation, and Construction.

3. Street Lights. Installation/construction of new streetlights at locations so designated by the City Council on the basis of lighting surveys conducted during the fiscal year.

The improvements listed above represent a rank ordering of priorities relative to the expenditure of assessments collected for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2026. These priorities are subject to change by subsequent action of the City Council; in particular, the completion of Item No. 3 depends upon the results of lighting surveys, environmental and traffic studies, and the balance of reserve/surplus funds remaining after completing Item Nos. 1 and 2. Maintenance, servicing, installation, and construction of these improvements will be accomplished by a combination of force account labor and private contracts. Plans and specifications concerning these improvements are on file in the City Engineer's Office.

ASSESSMENT ROLL
All assessed lots or parcels of real property located within City boundaries are listed on the Assessment Roll (see Appendix D) on file in the office of the City Clerk, which is made a part of this Report. These lots and parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code and are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and are made a part of this Report.

METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT
Introduction
The exemptions from the procedural and approval requirements are set forth in Section 5 of Article XIIID of Proposition 218 and include the following:
"(a) any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control "
The City of Port Hueneme Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 87-1 qualifies as an existing assessment with the district funding items in FY 2026-27 that are considered exempt under the provision (a) quoted above, specifically: "sidewalk" and "streets" improvements.

Agenda Item No. 08 Page 20 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
3 Sidewalk is defined by the City of Port Hueneme General Plan as the construction, operation, or maintenance of facilities within the public right-of-way used for the general conveyance of pedestrians, bicycles, and skaters. Such facilities shall include necessary safety appurtenances such as lighting and lane delineations.

Street Improvement is defined based on the definitions provided by the Office of the Controller for the State of California in the Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures published by the Division of Local Government Fiscal Affairs. The State's gas tax program is administered in city agencies, but audited by the Office of the State Controller. The proceeds of the gas tax are statutorily limited to expenditures for streets and roads. Because the funds are restricted to street and road costs, the State Controller has developed "Street Purpose Definitions and Guidelines" based on the Manual of Uniform Highway Accounting and Financial Management Procedures developed by the American Association of State Highway Officials. Street improvement is defined as the construction, operation, or maintenance of facilities within the right-of-way used for street or road purposes including, but not limited to, the following:
• Installation or expansion of the street lighting system including replacement of old equipment with superior equipment, installation of traffic signals at intersections and railroad crossings, replacement of equipment as required for relocations for street purposes, and purchase and installation of traffic signal control equipment. • Expansion or installation of fences, raised medians or barriers for traffic safety; installation or addition to landscape treatment such as sod, shrubs, trees, irrigation, etc; installation or extension of curb, gutter, or sidewalks; and replacement of retaining walls to a higher standard.
• Servicing lighting systems and street or road traffic control devices including repainting and repairing traffic signals and lighting standards; furnishing of power for street and road lighting and traffic control devices.
• Mowing, tree trimming, and watering within the street right-of-way; replacing top soil, sod, shrubs, trees, irrigation facilities, etc. on the street and roadside; reseeding, resodding, and repairing of shoulders and approaches; reshaping or restoration of drainage channels and side slopes; cleaning or repairing of culverts and drains, or curb and gutter.

Moreover, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District, in Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. City of Riverside (1999) 73 Cal.App.4th 679, has held that pre-existing street lighting assessments are exempt from Proposition 218.

Formula
The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The net amount to be assessed upon lands within the Assessment District in accordance with this Report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the Agenda Item No. 08 Page 21 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
4 improvements, namely the maintenance and servicing of public lighting facilities within such District. The maintenance and servicing of public lighting facilities installed and constructed in public places provides a special benefit that is received by each and every assessed lot or parcel within the District, tending to enhance their value. The streets within the District improve access to all lots or parcels assessed. Street lighting also provides advertising visibility for business and commercial establishments. The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a bearing on the benefits of street lighting. Thus, the primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety, security, and protection of people. Secondary benefits are security or protection to property, property improvements and goods as set forth below.

1. Improvement to traffic circulation.

2. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human misery and economic loss.

3. Less vulnerability to criminal assault at night.

4. Promotion of business during night time hours for commercial properties.

5. Increased night time safety on roads and highways.

6. Improved ingress and egress to lots and parcels.

7. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts.

8. Reduction in burglaries.

9. The enhancement to the value of property that results from the foregoing benefits.

Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies with the type of street, date of installation and the use of the property adjacent thereto.

The majority of parcels within the Lighting District are residential properties. A value of one (1) unit has been assigned to the single-family homes. Parcels in other land use categories were then evaluated and rated by comparison with the basic unit (Appendix A).

Each land use evaluation takes into consideration - foot traffic, vehicular traffic, and hours of occupancy.

Commercial and industrial properties have been assigned additional units based on the comparative benefits of the security and intensity of the lights provided as measured by land use intensity compared to single-family residential properties. The average light intensifies and energy consumption for commercial areas is greater than that required for residential areas.

COST AND REVENUE ESTIMATES
The estimated costs of operating the District and revenue sources are shown in Appendix B of this Report.

In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments within Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 87-1 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that are received.

ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTED BY:

CHARLES CABLE, P.E. 80020 (DATE)

DISTRICT ENGINEER

PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 22 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT D

APPENDIX A

CITY OF PORT HUENEME
Apportionment Formula
The following are typical site use codes as described by the Ventura County Assessors Office and their proposed Lighting Units. This list includes the majority of parcel uses within the City.

The 2014-15 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2015-16 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2016-17 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2017-18 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2018-19 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2019-20 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2020-21 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2021-22 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2022-23 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2023-24 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2024-25 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The 2025-26 Lighting Assessment was $16.66 per residential parcel.

The estimated 2026-27 Lighting Assessment is $16.66 per Assessment Unit.

A-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 23 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

APPENDIX B

LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-1
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972

ESTIMATED BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance - July 1, 2026 $ 0
UNRESTRICTED FUND BALANCE - JULY 1, 2026 $ 0

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Assessment ............................................................................. $ 122,244 TOTAL REVENUES $ 122,244

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
SCE Utility Bills $185,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $185,000

ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE
June 30, 2027 $ 0
B-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 24 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 25 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

APPENDIX D
Assessment Roll
The Assessment Roll shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel within this Assessment District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and in the office of the County Assessor and is made a part of this report.

D-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 26 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

APPENDIX E

RESOLUTION
(To be inserted at the conclusion of the public hearing.) E-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 27 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 28 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT E

CITY OF PORT HUENEME
Engineer's Report

PARKWAY AND MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
For Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 29 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Preface.......................................................................................................1 Description of Improvements......................................................................1 Assessment Roll ........................................................................................2 Method and Formula of Assessment..........................................................2 Cost and Revenue Estimates.....................................................................3 Appendix A - Apportionment Formula .................................................... A-1 Appendix B - Budget 2026-27 ................................................................ B-1 Appendix C - Assessment Diagram ....................................................... C-1 Appendix D - Assessment Roll............................................................... D-1 Appendix E - Resolutions ....................................................................... E-1 Agenda Item No. 08 Page 30 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
1 CITY OF PORT HUENEME
Engineer's Report

PARKWAY AND MEDIAN
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
For Fiscal Year 2026-2027

This Assessment District, by special benefit assessments, will provide funding for installation and maintenance of the public landscaping in parkways and medians in the street right-of-way within the City of Port Hueneme. The items funded by the District are exempt from the procedural and approval requirements set forth in Section 5(a) of Article XIIID that states:
“...assessments existing on the effective date of this Article shall be exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 [if they were] imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control " As discussed herein, the improvements funded by the Assessment District for fiscal year 2026-27 are pre-existing and the assessments are used to fund the maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

Therefore, the Assessment District is exempt from the procedural and approval requirements of Article XIIID.

DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS
This report covers the levy of assessments for the period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. An updated report must be prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs, future improvements, and changes in parcelization.

Since formation of the Parkway and Median Maintenance Assessment District in 1991, assessments have been used exclusively for the maintenance and servicing of medians and parkways along arterial and collector streets within the boundaries of the City.

Parkway and median maintenance for FY 2026-27 includes maintenance of landscape, including but not limited to watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, pruning, and removal and replacement of dead growth; maintenance of supporting irrigation facilities; maintenance of hardscape, including but not limited to wood signage and bollards, decorative stamped concrete, and wood sign lighting; and ancillary work necessary to support these improvements. Reference is made to the plans and specifications Agenda Item No. 08 Page 31 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
2 currently on file at the City Engineer's Office relating to the design, recommended materials and level of maintenance concerning the medians and street parkways.

ASSESSMENT ROLL
All assessed lots or parcels of real property located within City boundaries are listed on the Assessment Roll (Appendix D) on file in the office of the City Clerk, which is made a part of this Report. These lots and parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code and are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California, 93009 and are made a part of this Report.

METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT
Introduction
The exemptions from the procedural and approval requirements are set forth in Section 5 of Article XIIID of Proposition 218 and include the following:
"(a) any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control."
The City of Port Hueneme Parkway and Median Maintenance Assessment District No. 91-1 qualifies as an existing assessment with the district funding items in FY 2026-27 that are considered exempt under the provision (a) quoted above, specifically: "streets" improvements.

Street Improvement is defined based on the definitions provided by the Office of the Controller for the State of California in the Guidelines Relating to GasTax Expenditures published by the Division of Local Government Fiscal Affairs. The State's gas tax program is administered in city agencies, but audited by the Office of the State Controller. The proceeds of the gas tax are statutorily limited to expenditures for streets and roads. Because the funds are restricted to street and road costs, the State Controller has developed "Street Purpose Definitions and Guidelines" based on the Manual of Uniform Highway Accounting and Financial Management Procedures developed by the American Association of State Highway Officials. Street improvement is defined as the construction, operation, or maintenance of facilities within the right-of-way used for street or road purposes including, but not limited to, the following:
• Installation or expansion of the street lighting system including replacement of old equipment with superior equipment, installation of traffic signals at intersections and railroad crossings, replacement of equipment as required for relocations for street purposes, and purchase and installation of traffic signal control equipment. • Expansion or installation of fences, raised medians or barriers for traffic safety; installation or addition to landscape treatment such as sod, shrubs, trees, irrigation, etc; installation or extension of curb, gutter, or sidewalks; and replacement of retaining walls to a higher standard.

Agenda Item No. 08 Page 32 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
3 • Servicing lighting systems and street or road traffic control devices including repainting and repairing traffic signals and lighting standards; furnishing of power for street and road lighting and traffic control devices.
• Mowing, tree trimming, and watering within the street right-of-way; replacing top soil, sod, shrubs, trees, irrigation facilities, etc. on the street and roadside; reseeding, resodding, and repairing of shoulders and approaches; reshaping or restoration of drainage channels and side slopes; cleaning or repairing of culverts and drains, or curb and gutter.

Moreover, the California court of Appeal for the Fourth District, in Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. City of Riverside (1999) 73 Cal.App.4th679, has held that pre-existing street lighting assessments are exempt from Proposition 218.

Formula
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The landscaping element of the assessment formula recognizes that all properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of landscaping within the public right-of-way. The benefits are shared by all land uses within the City, and includes such benefits as aesthetic enjoyment, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming schedule and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from trimming trees which may otherwise interfere with street sweeping operations. The majority of parcels with the Parkway and Median Maintenance Assessment District are residential parcels. A value of one (1) unit has been assigned to single family homes. Parcels in other land use categories were then evaluated and rated by comparison with the basic unit. The assignment of unit values is based primarily on the intensity of land use (Appendix A).

COST AND REVENUE ESTIMATES
The estimated costs of operating the District and revenue sources are shown in Appendix B of this report.

In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments within the Parkway and Median Maintenance Assessment District No. 91-1 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that are received.

ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTED BY:

CHARLES CABLE, P.E. 80020 (DATE)

DISTRICT ENGINEER

PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 33 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

APPENDIX A

CITY OF PORT HUENEME
Apportionment Formula
The apportionment element of the assessment formula is calculated in accordance with the method described in a proceeding portion of this report. The following are typical site use codes as described by the Ventura County Assessors Office and their proposed Assessment Units. This list includes the majority of parcel uses within the City.

Land Use Code Assessment Units
Residential
Single Family Residential 1111 1 Unit per parcel
Condominium/Townhome 1129 1 Unit per parcel
Open Space/Common Area 4000 Exempt
Apartments/Duplex 1150 0.75 per Unit
Commercial
Small, Single Tenant 5000 2 Units per parcel
Vacant 50,000 SF + 5011 2 Units per parcel
Neighborhood Centers 5030 4 Units per parcel
Major Shopping Centers 5310 7 Units per parcel
Trade/Services
Small Offices (1 or 2) 6000 2 Units per parcel
Mid-Size Office Bldgs. 6020 4 Units per parcel
Major Office Bldgs 6590 7 Units per parcel
Hospital/Lg. Medical Offices 6516 7 Units per parcel
Industrial
Vacant Lots > 50,000 SF 2011 2 Units per parcel
Mid-Size Industrial 2000 4 Units per parcel
Multi-Tenant Industrial 2030 4 Units per parcel
Major Industry 2020 6 Units per parcel
Public Facilities 6711 Exempt
Parks 6712 Exempt
Public Schools 6812 Exempt
Redevelopment Agency 6535 Exempt
The 2014-15 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit The 2015-16 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit The 2016-17 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit The 2017-18 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit The 2018-19 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit The 2019-20 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit The 2020-21 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit The 2021-22 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit.

The 2022-23 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit.

The 2023-24 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit.

The 2024-25 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit The 2025-26 Parkway and Median Assessment was $24.32 per Assessment Unit The estimated 2026-27 Parkway and Median Assessment is $24.32 per Assessment Unit.

A-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 34 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

APPENDIX B
PARKWAY AND MEDIAN MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972

ESTIMATED BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
July 1, 2026 $ 383,267

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Assessment $ 176,060
TOTAL REVENUES $ 176,060

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Parkway and Median Maintenance $ 156,223.80
Tree Expense Contract Services $ 230,000.00
Utilities $ 2,500.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 388,723.80

ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE
June 30, 2027 $ 170,603.20
B-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 35 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 36 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

D-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 37 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

APPENDIX E

RESOLUTION
(To be inserted at the conclusion of the public hearing.) E-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 38 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

ATTACHMENT F

CITY OF PORT HUENEME
Engineer's Report

PORT HUENEME DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-3
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
For Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 39 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

Appendix C - Assessment Diagram ....................................................... C-1 Appendix D - Assessment Roll............................................................... D-1 Appendix E - Resolutions ....................................................................... E-1 Agenda Item No. 08 Page 40 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

CITY OF PORT HUENEME
Engineer's Report

PORT HUENEME DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-3
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
For Fiscal Year 2026-27

PREFACE
This report is prepared in recognition of the requirements of Proposition 218 as stated in Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution, and Chapters 1 and 4 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

This Assessment District, by special benefit assessments, will provide funding for drainage facilities within public right-of-way within the City of Port Hueneme. The items funded by the District are exempt from the procedural and approval requirements set forth in Section 5(a) of Article XIIID that states:
“... assessments existing on the effective date of this Article shall be exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 [if they were] imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control "

As discussed herein, the improvements funded by the Assessment District for fiscal year 2026-27 are preexisting and the assessments are used to fund the maintenance and operation expenses for a drainage system. Therefore, the Assessment District is exempt from the procedural and approval requirements of Article XIIID.

DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS

This report covers the levy of assessments for the period of July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027. An updated report must be prepared each year to reflect the updated annual costs, future improvements and changes in parcelization.

Since formation of the District in 1995, a portion of the assessments has been used exclusively for maintenance and servicing of drainage system facilities owned by the City and located within public rightof-way within the boundaries of the City. Drainage system maintenance for FY 2026-27 includes all activities related to ensuring that the design storm-carrying capacity of the Hueneme Drain (Bubbling Springs Channel) is maintained. Reference is made to the plans and specifications currently on file at the City Engineer's Office relating to this system.

ASSESSMENT ROLL
All assessed lots or parcels of real property located within City boundaries are listed on the Assessment Roll (Appendix D) on file in the office of the City Clerk, which is made a part of this Report. These lots and 1 Agenda Item No. 08 Page 41 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code and are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California, 93009 and are made a part of this Report.

METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT
Introduction
The exemptions from the procedural and approval requirements are set forth in Section 5 of Article XIIID of Proposition 218 and include the following:
"(a) any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control "
The Port Hueneme Drainage Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-3 qualifies as an existing assessment with the district funding items in FY 2026-27 that are considered exempt under the provision (a) quoted above, specifically: "drainage systems" improvements.

Drainage System is defined by the Federal-Aid Highway Program Manual prepared by the U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration as the construction, operation, or maintenance of facilities within the public right-of-way that "encourage a broad and unified effort to prevent uneconomic, hazardous, or incompatible use and development of the Nation's flood plains" and "to restore and preserve the natural and beneficial flood-plain values."
The City provides services for drainage purposes including, but not limited to, the following:
• Installation, expansion, operation, maintenance or servicing of vegetation to mitigate erosion and improve flood control.
• Channel clearing and debris removal.
• Reshoring and repairing of slopes to maintain the integrity of the drainage facility and to repair erosion.

Formula
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573 of the Streets and Highways Code states that "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements." The apportionment formula recognizes that residential properties within the drainage area of the facilities being maintained through this District benefit from the maintenance of this drainage facility. This District assesses the residential properties within the drainage area of the Hueneme Drain (Bubbling Springs Channel) for the residential share of the cost to maintain this facility. Non-residential properties are not assessed in this District, and Port Hueneme Drainage Maintenance Assessment District No. 97-1 2 Agenda Item No. 08 Page 42 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026 (proposed in FY 1997-98) would have assessed non-residential properties in Zones 2, 3, and 4, but received a majority protest and was not adopted.

The portion of the City north of Sunkist Street does not benefit from the facilities funded by this District because that area's drainage is provided through the Ventura County Flood Control District through separate channels. The Naval Base also does not benefit from these improvements because drainage facilities that exist on the Base drain west to the ocean, away from the facilities funded by this District.

Finally, the Harbor District properties do not benefit from these improvements because their drainage flows directly into the harbor. The parcels within these areas are therefore not assessed for the drainage facilities funded by this District.

The assessment formula for District No. 95-3 recognizes that residential properties within the boundaries of Zones 2, 3, and 4 shown on the boundary map attached as Appendix C, drain into the drainage facility funded through the District; and therefore, benefit from the maintenance of this drainage facility and assessed in the District. The formula recognizes that residential properties have different levels of benefit depending upon the type of dwelling and household size. The formula takes these differences into consideration and fairly distributes the net amount among all residential parcels and lots within Zones 2, 3, and 4 as shown in Appendix A.

The spread of the benefit from the maintenance that is being provided through the District is shown on Appendix B-1. The level of service that will be funded by the FY 2026-27 assessment is expected to be approximately equal to that provided in FY 2025-26. Because the items funded are limited to drainage maintenance, all benefit accrues exclusively to Zones 2, 3, and 4. The assessment rates for each Zone are shown on Appendix B-1.

COST AND REVENUE ESTIMATES
The estimated costs of operating the District and revenue sources are shown in Appendix B-2 of this report.

In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments within the Drainage Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-3 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that are received.

ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTED BY:

CHARLES CABLE, P.E. 80020 (DATE)

DISTRICT ENGINEER

PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
3 Agenda Item No. 08 Page 43 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

APPENDIX A

CITY OF PORT HUENEME
Apportionment Formula
The apportionment element of the spread formula is calculated in accordance with the method described in a preceding portion of this report. The following are typical site use codes as described by the Ventura County Assessors Office and their proposed Assessment Units. This list includes the majority of parcel uses within the City.

The 2015-16 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The 2016-17 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The 2017-18 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The 2018-19 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The 2019-20 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The 2020-21 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The 2021-22 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The 2022-23 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The 2023-24 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The 2024-25 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The 2025-26 Drainage Maintenance Assessment was $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

The estimated 2026-27 Drainage Maintenance Assessment is $43.84 per Assessment Unit.

A-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 44 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
APPENDIX B-1

PROPOSED PORT HUENEME DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT RATES FOR FY 2026-27
ASSESSMENT BREAKDOWN BY ZONE (1)
Zone Total A.U. (2) Total Assessment
Sunkist to Beach (2-4) 4,221 $185,049
4,221 $185,049

ASSESSMENT BREAKDOWN BY PARCEL
LAND USE A.U. ASSESSMENT PER UNIT
Single Family Residential 1.0 $ 43.84
Condominium/Townhome 1.0 $ 43.84
Apartments/Duplex Unit .75 $ 32.88
Mobile Home .75 $ 32.88
Footnotes:
(1) The Engineer's Report and Resolution Nos. 2882 and 2892 adopted by the City Council for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, states that, the total assessment may be increased up to five percent annually. No increase is requested for FY 2026-27. (2) A.U. stands for Assessment Units. Assessment Units are computed as the number of dwellings located within each zone times the corresponding Assessment Unit values shown in Appendix A.

B-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 45 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
APPENDIX B-2

PORT HUENEME DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-3
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972

ESTIMATED BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
July 1, 2026 $ 647,357

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Assessment $185,050

TOTAL REVENUES $185,050

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Maintenance Services $ 74,789.76
Lake & Streambed Alteration Project $ 148,816.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 223,605.76

ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE
June 30, 2027 $ 608,801.24
B-2
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 46 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

Agenda Item No. 08 Page 47 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

D-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 48 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

APPENDIX E

RESOLUTION
(To be inserted at the conclusion of the public hearing.) E-1
Agenda Item No. 08 Page 49 of 49 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
DATE: June 1, 2026
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: James Vega, City Manager
Fred Camarillo, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: BOLKER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PARKING LAYOUT
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to prepare a detailed design and proceed with implementation of the proposed parking layout using angled parking along the east side of Bolker Drive between Sharon Lane and Hemlock Street to continue to address parking needs in the Bolker Park Neighborhood.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:

On November 18, 2024, the City Council authorized staff to conduct an analysis of citywide parking concerns and to identify potential solutions. The analysis evaluated impacts on neighboring streets and prioritized strategies to improve parking conditions while minimizing potential adverse effects.

On June 16, 2025, the Public Works Department presented the Citywide Neighborhood Parking Analysis and Alternatives Study to the City Council. Multiple neighborhoods were evaluated, and the City Council subsequently directed staff to implement select citywide solutions that are cost-effective and easily achievable. These measures include removing red curb restrictions at select drainage inlets, installing stop signs at targeted intersections, enforcing parking restrictions in front of private driveways on a complaintonly basis, prohibiting oversized vehicles, and other similar actions.

Residents in the Bolker Park neighborhood have continued to express concerns regarding the lack of available parking. In response, the City Council requested additional information on potential improvements specific to this area. Based on the previously completed analysis, several strategies were identified to increase parking capacity within the Bolker Park neighborhood.

Some long-term measures were proposed that would require partnerships and/or coordination with HOA’s and others to increase private parking related items. However, staff reviewed the analysis for an option that relates to public parking that the City would have the ability to implement more quickly and has identified a potential option: adding Agenda Item No. 09 Page 1 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
Bolker Park Parking
June 1, 2026

Page 2 ends

angled parking along the east side of Bolker Drive between Sharon Lane and Hemlock Street.

Private parking is inherently more difficult to regulate, as it is controlled by private entities.

In contrast, the City has authority over public property and rights-of-way, making it easier to implement and enforce regulations in these areas. Based on the analysis, adding angled parking appears to be the most effective and beneficial option for increasing parking capacity in the Bolker Park neighborhood. The study includes schematics illustrating the proposed angled parking configurations, as shown in Figures 1 through 3 below.

It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to prepare a detailed design and proceed with implementation of the proposed parking layout, or provide direction on any additional actions the Council would like staff to pursue.

Figure 1. Plan view of Bolker Drive between Sharon Lane and Bolker Way Figure 2. Plan view of Bolker Drive between Bolker Way and Hemlock Agenda Item No. 09 Page 2 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
Bolker Park Parking
June 1, 2026

Page 3 ends

Fig 3. Cross Section of Bolker Drive.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Sufficient funds for the preparation or review of a striping plan by a licensed traffic engineer are available in Account No. 101-550-5204; However, approval of this action would require an additional appropriation of $8,000 for the construction materials in Account No. 101-551-5524.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Primary Strategic Pillar(s) and Initiative(s):

A. 2025 Neighborhood Parking Evaluation Technical Memorandum Agenda Item No. 09 Page 3 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Agenda Item No. 09 Page 4 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
1 TECHNICAL

MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 11, 2025
TO: Charles Cable, PE
City Engineer
City of Port Hueneme
FROM: Thomas Mericle, PE, TE
Principal
TKM Engineering
SUBJECT: Neighborhood Parking Evaluation – Data and Alternatives The City has contracted with TKM Engineering and their subconsultant, AllianceJB, to gather field data, evaluate alternatives, and prepare recommendations for addressing concerns about the lack of parking for residents in their neighborhood at various locations across the City. As a part of this effort, we have focused on seven evaluation areas shown in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1 – Parking Evaluation Areas
Attachment A
Agenda Item No. 09 Page 5 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
2 The Parking Evaluation Areas in residential neighborhoods were named for ease of comprehension and are used in the report, including HOAs as follows:

A1: “Victoria-Marina” – Hemlock/Victoria and Marina/Victoria HOAs A2: “Pacific Collection” – Pacific Collection HOA
B: “Yankee Landing” – Yankee Landing HOA
C: “Bolker Park” – Sandpiper I and II HOAs
D: “Ponoma-Clara” – Seaside Walk, Anacapa Walk, Harbor Walk, Port Harbor Homes, and Mar Vista HOAs
Data Collection
This parking study analyzed supply and utilization across eight areas shown in Figure 1, examining both weekday and weekend parking patterns. The study collected data from both public and private parking spaces. Parking data was collected over the course of several weeks from January through March. The data collection goal was to determine peak parking utilization within the evaluation areas being studied. Parking counts were conducted during the middle of the day and the middle of the night on typical weekdays and weekend days. Parking counts were also conducted on days that would not be impacted by the City's street sweeping schedule.

Parking Observations
A summary of the most significant parking observations, related to both public and private parking, within Areas A, B, C, D, E, F, and Seaview, for both day and night, is provided as follows:

Area A1 (Victoria-Marina)
• On street public parking is approaching 100% at night and on street sweeping days.
• Some private driveway parking spaces are available in front of garage doors. • Private driveway areas at Laundromat doors could be signed to provide parking spaces at night.
• Area A1 parking appears to overflow into Area A2 and onto adjacent arterial roads.
• Catch basin curbs are painted red.
• Vehicles were observed to park at red curbs, curb returns, crosswalks, and fire hydrants.

Agenda Item No. 09 Page 6 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
3 Area A2 (Pacific Collection)
• Close Driveway Spacing leaves many sets of curb lengths that are not usable for parking.
• Catch basin curbs that were red have been painted gray.

Area B (Yankee Landing)
• On street parking is approaching 100% at night and on street sweeping days. • Vehicles are prohibited from parking in shared driveways, except during street sweeping hours,
• Vehicles were observed to park at red curbs, curb returns, crosswalks, and fire hydrants.

Area C (Bolker Park)
• On street parking is approaching 100% at night and on street sweeping days. • Prohibited parking at the Bolker Park parking lots is 100% utilized at night. • Parking is prohibited at northern garages due to fire access, and garages are difficult to enter.
• Private parking spaces on Sharon Lane are numbered and likely assigned to residents.
• Parking is prohibited at private garage areas on Sharon Lane, and garages are difficult to enter.
• Some driveway parking spaces in front of the single family residence garages are available.
• Catch basins are painted red.
• Vehicles were observed to park at red curbs, curb returns, crosswalks, and fire hydrants.

Area D (Ponoma-Clara)
• On street parking is approaching 100% at night and on street sweeping days on internal streets.
• Driveways at the front of the residential properties are near 100% occupied at night.
• Catch basin curbs are painted red,
• Some vehicles were observed to park in lawns.
• Vehicles were observed to park at red curbs, curb returns, crosswalks, and fire hydrants.

Parking Lots E & F
• Lots were essentially empty at night.
• Lots were less than 50% occupied during day.

Agenda Item No. 09 Page 7 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
4 Seaview Street
• Parking is approaching 80 to 90% occupancy at night and during street sweeping days.
• Adjacent on-site private property residential parking is nearly 100% occupied at night.

Overall Observations Applicable to All Areas
• About 20% of open garage doors were observed to have space for vehicle parking. About 80% of open garage doors were observed to include storage of materials, man caves, and children play areas. The freeing up of garage parking could free up on street parking.
• Implementation of AB 413 enforcement could cause parking disbursement to other areas of the city or the adjacent city.
• Warnings and/or enforcement of 72-hour parking restrictions could be implemented.
• Some streets in some neighborhoods could potentially be designated one way with installation of diagonal parking.
• Removal of some red carb areas could potentially add parking spaces.

Parking Data Summary
Peak residential neighborhood parking utilization for Areas A, B, C, D, and G (Seaview) occurred during weekdays and weekend nights. Peak parking utilization within lots E and F occurred during the day. Weekday and Weekend Peak Parking Supply and Demand Data are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2 below:

Table 1 – Peak Weekday Parking Supply and Demand
Agenda Item No. 09 Page 8 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
5 Table 2 – Peak Weekend Parking Supply and Demand
The supply and demand data in the two tables above include adjacent streets such as Hemlock, Pleasant Valley, and Ventura, as well as the private parking lot areas off Seaview. Peak parking is during the night for residential area street and private parking, while peak parking is during the day for lots E and F.

Analysis
When looking at parking utilization, the industry standard is that the maximum desirable parking utilization is 85%, which provides for some available parking, but does not waste public resources to provide more parking. Many parking districts (such as the City of Ventura and the City of Pasadena) manage their parking program and pricing based on this 85% target. The data shows that Areas A1, B, and C, along with several streets in Area D, exceed 85% for public parking spaces, and are close to or over that amount for the private parking spaces. These are the primary areas within the City’s residential neighborhoods that will be evaluated.

Increasing parking supply by increasing the number of parking spaces within proximity to the residential areas with the highest demand will reduce or eliminate the issues associated with high parking utilization, illegal parking, spillover parking, increased traffic by drivers seeking a space, and driver stress. Parking supply can be increased by adding public parking, adding private parking, or adjusting parking regulations.

Adding Public Parking
There are several general techniques that should be considered to increase the public parking supply as follows:

Agenda Item No. 09 Page 9 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
6 1. Remove red curb at drainage inlets. There are a few drainage inlets (catch basins) around the City that are painted red to prohibit parking adjacent to the inlet. This may have been done to improve drainage flow into the inlet and to make the basin available for intermittent cleaning. Because there is infrequent drainage flow that such parking would impact, and intermittent maintenance can be achieved through prohibiting parking with 72-hour notice, it is recommended that the red curb at these locations be removed. This would add a few spaces in Areas A1, B, C, D, and on Seaview, and could be prioritized for the highest utilization areas.

2. Install all way stop signs at key intersections in heavily parked neighborhoods to provide more parking where existing red curb has been installed to create intersection sight distance. When the all way stop is installed the full red curb for sight distance is no longer needed. The City could consider a pilot program for a few intersections and then monitor the impact and stop compliance to make sure the stop signs are being respected.

3. Marking crosswalks to be slightly narrower or closer in the intersection, while complying with Assembly Bill 413 (AB 413) provisions that require a 20-foot clear zone at the approach to marked and unmarked crosswalks. The configuration of existing access ramps would need to be considered, but this could add some curb parking area on a case by case basis.

4. Add angled parking along certain streets within the impacted areas where the street is wide enough to provide angled parking, or where a set of parallel oneway streets (couplets) could be implemented. Specifics on this technique are discussed in the specific area of alternative recommendations:

Adding Private Parking
Parking could be increased by allowing wider driveways and by allowing additional parking areas that are not directly in front of garages. Current Municipal Code Section 10226(C) addresses front yard parking restrictions. This section prohibits certain activities in front yards, including the parking of inoperable vehicles. Also, while not explicitly prohibiting all types of front yard parking, the code imposes limitations on the amount of hardscaping in front yard areas. For example, Ordinance No. 795 specifies that fixed concrete, asphalt, or similar monolithic landscaping shall not cover more than 50% of the required front yard area. This limitation indirectly restricts the amount of space available Agenda Item No. 09 Page 10 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
7 for parking in front yards. In order to implement this alternative, a change would need to be made to the Municipal Code.

Parking Regulations
There are some general parking regulations could be used to potentially free up parking spaces in neighborhoods that are being used for the parking of commercial vehicles, storage of personal vehicles, or storage of trailers. These regulations are discussed as follows:

1. Allow parking in front of their driveway. It is currently illegal for property owners or residents to park in front of their own driveway per California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22507.2. If allowed, through permitting. This would increase the number of available spaces by one per driveway. Implementing this would require the City to adopt an ordinance to create a permit system to allow the parking to comply with CVC requirements. This could have a significant increase to parking supply in the highest utilization neighborhoods such as area A2, C, and D.

Because implementing this would create a new permitting program with additional effort by the City and permit costs to the residents, the City could move to a complaint-based enforcement policy. This would allow residents to park adjacent to their own driveway, but they would be able to request enforcement if someone else parked in their driveway.

2. Prohibit commercial vehicle parking in residential neighborhoods. Currently, Sections 3265 and 3267 of the City Municipal Code prohibits the parking of truck tractors and tractor trailers on City streets. However, it does not specifically prohibit commercial vehicle parking. This prohibition could potentially open up a few parking spaces where there are commercial trucks taking up parking spaces.

Observations from the field data collection indicate that this is currently occurring only at a couple locations; and therefore, the number of parking spaces gained by implementing this type of prohibition would be minimal. Implementing this would require an Ordinance and the placement of signage at all entrances to the City.

3. Prohibit oversized vehicles in the City. The ban on oversized vehicles, including motorhomes and camping trailers, is not ideal because these types of vehicles occupy multiple parking spaces and pose safety concerns. Prohibiting them could potentially free up some parking spaces. This ban would require the City to issue Agenda Item No. 09 Page 11 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
8 permits for short-term parking, allowing residents to prepare for or conclude a trip. Typically, these permits are valid for no more than 2-3 days. Observations from field data collection indicate that this is currently happening only at a couple of locations; therefore, the number of parking spaces gained from implementing this prohibition would be minimal. Implementing this measure would require an Ordinance and the installation of signage at all entrances to the City.

4. Enforce the 72-hour parking law. California Vehicle Code 22651(k) states that a vehicle is only allowed to park in the same spot on a public street for up to 72- hours (3 days). This CVC section provides the legal authority for law enforcement to remove vehicles that have been parked in the same location for more than 72 consecutive hours. Vehicles parked beyond this time may be issued a warning, cited and/or towed, even if they have a residential parking permit for that area. The enforcement is only allowed if a local ordinance has been adopted to implement the state law. The City’s Municipal Code section 3280 provides this approval; however, due to the City’s weekly street sweeping schedule, a 7-day version of this parking law is essentially already in place since vehicles have to be moved every 7 days due to the Street Sweeping No Parking regulations.

5. Prohibit the parking of unattached trailers in the City. Currently, Sections 3265 and 3267 of the City Municipal Code prohibits the parking of truck tractors and tractor trailers on City streets. However, there is no current provision for other types of trailers, such as work trailers, RV trailers, or boat trailers. Observations from the field data collection indicate that this is currently occurring only at a couple locations; and therefore, the number of parking spaces gained by implementing this type of prohibition would be minimal. Implementing this would require an Ordinance and the placement of signage at all entrances to the City.

Specific Study Area Parking Improvement Alternatives
This section will discuss potential parking improvement measures to be considered for implementation within each of the areas studied, and will focus on these primary impacted areas:
• Area A1 – Victoria-Marina
• Area B – Yankee Landing
• Area C – Bolker Park
• Parts of Area D – Ponoma-Clara
Agenda Item No. 09 Page 12 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
9 Area A1 – Victoria-Marina Parking Improvement Alternatives Parking Improvement Alternatives within the Victoria-Marina neighborhood are discussed as follows:

Adding public parking

1. Provide additional parking along the roadways adjacent to the area. The estimated additional parking spaces gained would be up to 26 spaces. a. Victoria Avenue is wide enough along the northbound side of the street to provide on-street parking while preserving the two northbound travel lanes and the northbound bike lane. Intersection sight distance would need to be provided near Marina Drive to provide visibility for vehicles entering onto Victoria Avenue from Marina Drive, but 20-25 spaces could be provided. Here is a sample cross-section (east half of Victoria):
b. Hemlock Street has one location just east of Victoria Ave. where there is about 31-feet of red curb at a drainage inlet. This can be removed to make space for at least one more vehicle.

2. Provide more interior street parking. The streets in the area are generally 40-feet wide with parallel parking on both sides and no driveways except for alley access driveways. We studied ways to add parking by converting one side to angled parking.

Consider adding angled parking along one side of four of the north-south streets within the area by implementing one-way couplets using Yardarm Ave, Spinnaker Ave, Sextant Ave, and Rudder Ave. These north–south roadways can be restriped to provide 30-degree parking along one side of each street. However, it will not Agenda Item No. 09 Page 13 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
10 allow for two-way vehicle travel if the parallel parking is left on the other side.

Therefore, we would have to consider a one-way street, which could be coupled with another adjacent street; for instance, designating Yardarm Ave-Spinnaker Ave and Sextant Ave-Rudder Ave as one-way pairs. However, If the angled parking were placed and the parallel parking remains on one side, there would only be 15-feet clear (see figure below). The Fire Code typically requires at least 20-feet clear to allow for a fire truck to pass another one while fighting a fire. It is possible that the 15-feet would be acceptable because the units in this area have access from the front and the back of the properties. If acceptable, the estimated additional parking spaces gained would be approximately 17 spaces total for these 4 streets.

Adding Private Parking

1. Provide an extra private parking space in front of the laundromat area (between the garages and between the driveway parking spaces) at each of the 183 multifamily dwelling units within the area. This may require a slight widening of the driveways to provide a wider parking space (instead of 8 feet wide) for parking a vehicle, and may require additional space for a pedestrian path of travel. The number of additional parking spaces gained would be 183 spaces.

2. Encourage the two HOAs (Hemlock/Victoria and Marina/Victoria) to allow (if currently not allowed), and encourage property owners to share unused parking between the units so that unused parking can be shared from one unit to another.

This could be in a free or paid arrangement. The additional parking supply provided by sharing the parking could add as many as 129 spaces during nighttime peak demand.

Agenda Item No. 09 Page 14 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
11 Other Considerations
The School Crossing across Hemlock St at Capstan Dr allows for parking all the way up to the crosswalk. State law now restricts parking within 20-feet of the crossing.

Constructing curb extensions would allow the 20-feet restriction to be reduced to a 15- feet restriction, and would provide better visibility and safety for pedestrians crossing.

Hemlock has an area of existing on-street parking along the north side of the street, and a no parking zone along the north side of the street that could be redesigned to provide additional parking, but the existing north side parking along Hemlock appears to be well utilized, and the north side of Hemlock is controlled by the City of Oxnard.

Area B – Yankee Landing Alternatives

Adding Private Parking

1. In this area, there are private areas adjacent to drive aisles and garages. Currently, parking is allowed occasionally when the street parking is prohibited for street sweeping. Current signs state:
“Parking is allowed for Yankee Landing Residents Only, & Only on Street Sweeping Days, between the hours of 6:00 AM – 7:00 PM.” This policy results in nearly 0% utilization of potential driveway parking spaces. We recommend that the HOA reevaluate their current policy and discuss with Fire and Code Enforcement to potentially allow parking in these areas more frequently, such as evenings and weekends, which would allow for greater use of this underutilized capacity.

Adding Public Parking
Additional street parking can be created by restriping roadways adjacent to the area.

1. Along Hemlock St., there is a long eastbound right turn pocket onto Patterson Rd. If this were to be redesigned to eliminate the gore area most of the right turn pocket adjacent to the fronting residential units, additional parallel curb parking along the south side of Hemlock could be provided (up to 14 spaces).

Agenda Item No. 09 Page 15 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
12 This alternative could be broken up into two phases. The first phase would be to add parking from it’s existing end point to the beginning of the right turn pocket where the pocket is narrowed to less than 18 feet. This would add an additional 10 spaces.

The second phase would be to remove the entire right turn pocket when the street is resurfaced in conjunction with a project with the City of Oxnard. This would add an additional 4 spaces.

Area C – Bolker Park Alternatives
Adding Private Parking

1. Private parking could be increased by allowing wider driveways and by allowing parking on areas that do not block access to adjacent residents’ garages, similar to what has been previously discussed. The estimated increase in available parking would be 102 parking spaces.

2. Implement a numbering system for driveway parking to improve organization and flexibility in those areas controlled by an HOA. The Sandpiper I and II HOAs could manage these spaces, which could be shared, traded, or subleased among residents depending on need.

Adding Public Parking

1. Modify the current parking restrictions within the Bolker Park parking lots to allow residential parking overnight from 5 pm to 8 am. This would be consistent with current usage and remove a potential parking enforcement issue.

2. Add angled parking along the east side of Bolker Dr. between Sharon Ln. and Hemlock St. This street, from curb to curb is wider than other streets in the area at 50-feet from curb-to-curb. This allows for 45-degree angled parking. The east side would be more efficient because there are no fire hydrants on that side.

Agenda Item No. 09 Page 16 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
13 Would add 2 spaces on the south section between Sharon Ln. and Bolker Way/Cir.

Would add 13 spaces on the northern section between Bolker Way/Cir. And Hemlock St. See the figures below:

The cross section would be as shown below and provides two way travel and fire clearance.

Area D – Ponoma-Clara Alternatives
Although parking within the entirety of this area is not near peak utilization (mostly due to a substantial amount of parking being available in the back portion of properties in the area, and also due to a substantial amount of parking being available on the southern-most and western-most streets within the area), there are several streets that are at high utilization. These streets are A Street, B Street, and C Street, which all exceed 85%. In addition, Ponoma and 3rd are close to 85%. We therefore have similar recommendations for increasing parking spaces along these streets and within the entirety of the area.

Agenda Item No. 09 Page 17 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
14 Adding Public Parking
Additional street parking can be created by restriping roadways adjacent to the area.

The guards at the gate stated that they need 2 inbound lanes all the way to Ventura Rd during peak periods because of gate queuing. This would need to be verified with field observations and further discussions with the Port District and Naval Base.

1. Pleasant Valley Road near Ponoma St is much wider than other parts of the roadway. This presents an opportunity to provide some angled parking to increase the parking supply for the residents to the south. There is an existing delineated area that is currently being used as a pedestrian path. We are not sure who is using this path and if it is required to be maintained. If it has to be maintained, one of the two westbound vehicle lanes might need to be removed depending on the angle of the angled parking area. Initial review indicates that either 30-degree or 45-degree angled parking might work. If the pedestrian area can be removed, both vehicle lanes may be able to remain or 60-degree angled parking may be able to be used.

Angled parking on the north side adds approximately 25 45-degree angled spaces in the configuration above and the cross section in the figure below.

Agenda Item No. 09 Page 18 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
15 However, the placement of angled parking on the north side is further away from the residents, and requires them to cross the street to get from and to their parked vehicles. It is suggested that a marked crosswalk be placed at the east side of the intersection of Pleasant Valley Rd and Ponoma St to facilitate safer crossing.

We also reviewed the placement of angled parking on the south side, but it is not as efficient due to intersections and driveways and would require much more roadway reconfiguration. See the cross section below.

2. Pleasant Valley Road east of the widened area may also be able to accommodate parallel parking along the north side, where there is a sidewalk. However, this would require the removal of a second vehicle lane. As discussed above, the traffic volumes and gate queuing would have to be further evaluated to determine if this is possible. The cross section below shows the potential configuration. This would add approximately 44 additional parking spaces.

If the two vehicle lanes are needed during the daytime for gate queuing and access, overnight parking could be provided through the use of time-of-day parking restrictions, which would allow parking along the north curbline for a set period of time overnight. For instance, from 5:00 pm to 7:00 am. The specific time frame would need to be set to correspond to gate peak periods and queuing.

Agenda Item No. 09 Page 19 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
16 3. We studied ways to add parking by converting one side of several of the internal streets to angled parking The streets can be restriped to provide 30-degree angled parking along one side of each street. However, it will not allow for twoway vehicle travel if parallel parking is left on the other side. Therefore, we would have to consider a series of one-way streets, which could be coupled with adjacent streets to form one-way couplets. However, similar to this suggestion within Area A1, If the angled parking were placed and the parallel parking remains on one side, there would only be 15-feet clear (see figure below). The Fire Code typically requires at least 20-feet clear to allow for a fire truck to pass another fire truck while fighting a fire; so for this reason, this interior street angled parking option is not considered to be a viable option.

Adding Private Parking
Private parking could be increased by providing extra parking spaces on driveways and in front of garage doors within the newer residential areas within Area D. It is estimated that the number of additional parking spaces gained could be approximately 78 spaces.

However, this may not be feasible because parking in front of garages in the alleyway would encroach within the fire access requirements and would require approval from the Fire Department.

Alternatives to Consider in the Future
Enforce Use of Garage for Parking of Vehicles

Garage parking spaces are being used for other purposes. It was visually estimated that approximately 80% of existing garages are not being used as vehicle parking spaces.

This was based on observed open garage doors where the contents of the garages could be visually observed (i.e., parking spaces available in the garages versus no parking spaces available in the garages), and by comparing the number of open garages that Agenda Item No. 09 Page 20 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
17 were filled with non-vehicle personal items to the total number of open garages observed.

This alternative involves increasing code enforcement so that garages are primarily used for storing parked vehicles. It is common for many garages to be utilized for personal item storage (such as bicycles, tools, exercise equipment, outdoor yard equipment, and home care equipment) and for additional living space. The Municipal Code does not permit either of these uses and currently requires that a garage be designated for parking vehicles. Since a complete transition of existing garage usages to solely parking could be practically challenging, the City could enforce the requirement by allowing a portion of the garage to remain used for personal item storage while continuing to prohibit its use as living space. This approach could be somewhat effective; however, property owners might choose to convert their garage space into an Auxiliary Dwelling Unit or Junior Auxiliary Dwelling Unit (ADU or JADU), thereby effectively reducing rather than increasing private parking.

Add Off-Street Public Parking near Areas A1 (Victoria-Marina) and A2 (Pacific Collection)
Acquire the rights to a vacant property to add public parking south of these areas near Victoria Ave. to provide more public parking in the vicinity. Along Victoria Ave near Crossjack St. there is a vacant lot. A portion of the lot could be conditioned, leased, or purchased to create off-street parking to serve the neighborhoods. The parking lot would not need to include the entire property, but possibly only a few aisles of parking along Crossjack St, Crossjack Alley, and Victoria Ave Service Road (See figure below).

This parking area could add 88 spaces.

Although this property has previously been entitled for a mixed-use development project, the project approvals are fairly old and may have expired. The parking could be achieved through a development agreement or a condition of future development to Agenda Item No. 09 Page 21 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
18 either provide additional parking for residents or allow the residents to park on the site in the evenings.

Add Off-Street Public Parking near Area C (Bolker Park) Patterson Rd is currently two lanes in each direction. The traffic volumes are approximately 3,500 per day in the southbound direction adjacent to residents. This relatively low traffic volume can be accommodated in one lane and parking could be provided along the western curb of Patterson Rd., while still keeping the bike lane. This could add an additional 15 parking spaces. The alternative would require restriping of the west side of the street to provide the parking and bike lanes, and coordination with the City of Oxnard for the lane transitioning. The existing location is shown in the first figure below and the cross section in the second figure. The should be considered the next time the street is resurfaced.

Active Transportation And Transit
Another way to decrease the demand for parking is to provide safe and reliable alternatives so that multiple-vehicle households can potentially reduce their need to keep or replace one or more of their vehicles. This would primarily require improving the connectivity and safety of bicycling and pedestrian facilities and adding transit routes with increased frequency. It is well documented that these techniques can reduce the demand for the public and private parking of vehicles; however, the focus of this Agenda Item No. 09 Page 22 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
19 memorandum is not on active transportation or transit, so these alternatives are merely mentioned within this study so they can be further evaluated if the City would choose to pursue other alternatives within an active transportation or transit study.

Permit Parking
Residential permit parking is a program used to manage parking in neighborhoods where demand from both internal and external sources exceeds supply. This is typically used in areas near commercial areas, schools, tourist destinations (such as the beach), or medical districts. The permit system prioritizes or restricts parking to the residents or property owners along a residential street or residential area. External parking demand is therefore restricted to a short time limit or prohibited altogether. The program aims to ensure residents can park near their homes while preventing long-term parking by employees or customers who would otherwise take up the limited neighborhood spaces.

Establishing a residential permit program would require the adoption of an ordinance to create the program and corresponding rules for implementation. Typically, they require a majority (or more) of the residents or property owners to agree to establishing the permit parking area. Once approved by the City Council, the City would post signs, and residents would be able to obtain permits, usually providing proof of residency like utility bills or lease agreements. The permits are typically physical permits to display in a car, or the City could use a license plate registration system.

One downside to a residential permit parking program is that the California Coastal Commission (CCC) is not supportive of its use in the coastal zone (coastal zone map attached). Although not currently prohibited by the City’s Coastal Program, it would require CCC support to implement. Implementing a permit parking program would increase pressure on enforcement to ensure non-permitted vehicles do not park illegally.

The results of the parking demand study indicate that, with the exception of some relatively minor spillover of parking from Area A1 into Area A2, there is not a lot of spillover into adjacent neighborhoods within the City of Port Hueneme. TKM Engineering is not recommending creating a permit parking program at this time. The primary parking utilization issues are not in areas of the City that are subject to external parking demands, which permit parking would address.

Paid Parking
Paid parking is where drivers pay fees to park in designated areas, commonly used in downtown commercial districts, beach areas, and other high-demand locations. Public Agenda Item No. 09 Page 23 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
20 Street parking uses meters, pay stations, or mobile apps where the driver would pay by the hour. In some cases, there is an initial period being free to allow for short term customer pickup or quick transactions. Parking lots typically charge hourly rates and use pay stations, mobile apps, or a gate system with pay booth. Some areas use dynamic pricing that adjusts rates based on demand. The City currently has paid parking in the beach parking lots.

A downside to an additional paid parking program is that the CCC would have to agree to its use in the coastal zone and may likely have to approve the rate structure.

Implementing an additional paid parking program would also increase pressure on enforcement.

Agenda Item No. 09 Page 24 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
Coastal Zone Boundary
• Surfside 1,2,3,4
• Surfside Village
• Pacific Collection
• Bungalows
• Pacific Collection
• Hemlock-Victoria
• Marina-Victoria
• Hueneme Shores
• Shell Harbor
• Harbor Villages
• Marlborough/Seaside
• Anacapa View Beach homes
• Anacapa View Condos
• Hideaway
• Beachport cottages
• Beachport Villas
• Portside Homes
• Willow brook area
• Areas west of Ventura Road &
South of Pleasant Valley
• Areas South of Hueneme Road
• Areas around Civic Center
City of Port Hueneme Communities within the Coastal Zone Agenda Item No. 09 Page 25 of 25 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
DATE: June 1, 2026
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: James Vega, City Manager
Georgianna N. Alvarez, City Clerk
SUBJECT: SENATE BILL (SB) 707 (DURAZO) OPEN MEETINGS: MEETING AND

TELECONFERENCE REQUIREMENTS
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that City Council:

1. Receive and file this SB 707 informational report; and

2. Adopt a Resolution, adopting a Technology Disruption Policy for the disruption of telephonic and internet service during public meetings.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:

On October 3, 2025, Governor Gavin Newsom signed California Senate Bill (SB) 707 into law making significant updates to the Ralph M. Brown Act which is intended to improve public participation and access to local government meetings.

Under SB 707, “eligible legislative bodies” will be subject to new requirements relating to the conduct of public meetings. The bill defines “eligible legislative bodies” as a City Council of a city with a population of 30,000 or more or a City Council of a city located in a county with a population of 600,000 or more. The City Council of the City of Port Hueneme qualifies as an “eligible legislative body” under this definition and is therefore subject to the requirements.

SB 707 established two key implementation dates. The first implementation date became effective on January 1, 2026, while the second implementation date will become effective on July 1, 2026. The corresponding requirements and the City’s compliance status for each implementation date are outlined below.

January 1, 2026:

The City is in compliance with requirements effective January 1, 2026. • Provide a copy of the Brown Act to any person elected or appointed to serve as a member of a legislative body of the local agency.

Agenda Item No. 10 Page 1 of 8 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
SB 707 Requirements
June 1, 2026

Page 2 ends

• Identify and make available to legislative bodies a list of one or more meeting locations that may be available for use by the legislative bodies to conduct their meetings.
• A member of the legislative body with a disability may participate remotely as a reasonable accommodation, including participation via audio only if their condition prevents participation on camera.
• Social media – The January 1, 2026, sunset date for AB 992’s social media restrictions has been removed indefinitely and clarifies that the legislative body can interact with the public on internet platforms without violating the Brown Act, as long as they do not discuss agency business among themselves. For example, Officials may engage with the public’s post on City matters to answer questions on a resident’s post; however, an Official cannot respond to, like, share, or repost other Councilmember’s content on the same topic to avoid “serial meetings.” • Legislative bodies are required to orally report a summary of recommendation for a final action on specified forms of compensation for a local agency executive including for a department head or other similar administrative officer of the local agency.

July 1, 2026:

The City will implement requirements by July 1, 2026.
• All open and public meetings shall include an opportunity for members of the public to attend via a two-way telephonic service or a two-way audiovisual platform. • Approve in open session a policy regarding disruption of telephonic or internet service occurring during meetings.
o The Policy is included as Attachment B for your review and approval. The Policy mirrors the meeting disruption guidelines that are outlined in SB707, which require the legislative body to take a recess and attempt to restore service for at least one hour. If service cannot be restored within one hour, the legislative body must conduct a roll call vote confirming that good faith efforts were made and that the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the need for remote access (Cal. Gov. Code § 54953.4(b)(1).) • Requires the Agenda for each meeting of an eligible legislative body to be translated into all “applicable languages” (any language spoken jointly by 20 percent or more of an applicable population that also speaks English less than “very well” according to the American Community Survey. • The accessible internet webpage shall be translated into all applicable languages and shall be accessible through a prominent direct link posted on the primary internet website home page of the eligible legislative body. • A physical location must be made available that is freely accessible to the public in reasonable proximity to the physical location in which the agenda and translations are posted, and shall allow members of the public to post additional translations of the agenda in that location.

Agenda Item No. 10 Page 2 of 8 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
SB 707 Requirements
June 1, 2026

Page 3 ends

As of January 1, 2026, SB 707 also authorizes remote teleconference meetings by “eligible subsidiary bodies” of local agencies, as long as the subsidiary bodies comply with certain requirements. An “eligible subsidiary body” included only advisory bodies that cannot take certain final action and do not have primary subject matter jurisdiction on elections, budgets, police oversight, privacy, library material restrictions, or taxing or spending proposals. The law requires at least one physical location for the meeting, that members attending remotely appear on camera and that the legislative body that created the subsidiary body make certain findings prior to authorizing fully remote meeting and at least every six months thereafter.

The full text of SB 707 can be found here:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB707 FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to receive this informational report or to adopt the Technology Disruption Policy.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Primary Strategic Pillar(s) and Initiative(s):

Optimal Levels of Service for Residents and Businesses
• Promote operational excellence in all City functions and embody best practices as a municipality
• Establish desired service levels for all City functions • Increase communication, outreach and proactive engagement of all members of our population
ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution including Exhibit A. Technology Disruption Policy Agenda Item No. 10 Page 3 of 8 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Agenda Item No. 10 Page 4 of 8 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT HUENEME,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTION POLICY FOR THE

DISRUPTION OF TELEPHONIC AND INTERNET SERVICE DURING PUBLIC

MEETINGS
WHEREAS, the Ralph M. Brown Act requires that meetings of legislative bodies be open and public; and
WHEREAS, on October 3, 2025, Governor Gavin Newsom signed California Senate Bill (SB) 707 into law making significant updates to the Ralph M. Brown Act; and WHEREAS, SB 707 requires eligible legislative bodies, on or before July 1, 2026, to adopt a policy addressing disruptions to telephonic or internet service occurring during meetings; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to ensure continued public access, transparency, and orderly conduct of meetings in the event of technological disruptions affecting remote participation.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT HUENEME, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The City Council adopts the Technology Disruption Policy (Exhibit A).

SECTION 2: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this ____ day of ________, 2026.

Martha R. McQueen-Legohn, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Georgianna Nicole Alvarez
City Clerk
Attachment A
Agenda Item No. 10 Page 5 of 8 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
Technology Disruption Policy
for the
Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service Occurring During Public Meetings

1. Background
Senate Bill 707 (2025) amended the Brown Act to require eligible legislative bodies to adopt, on or before July 1, 2026, a policy addressing how the agency will respond to disruptions in telephonic or internet service that prevent members of the public from attending or observing a meeting remotely. This policy is adopted to comply with that requirement and to ensure continuity of public participation during technical disruptions.

2. Purpose
This policy establishes procedures for responding to a disruption in the telephonic or internet services that provide two-way remote public access to meetings of the City of Port Hueneme City Council, as required by the Brown Act (Gov. Code § 54953.4). The policy ensures transparency, public participation, and continuity of government during technology disruptions.

3. Definitions
For purposes of this policy:
• “Disruption” means any failure, outage, or other interruption that prevents members of the public from attending or observing the meeting via these remote access services. • “Remote access services” means the two-way telephonic service and/or two-way audiovisual platform used to provide real-time remote public attendance and observation of meetings.

4. Applicability
This policy applies to all open and public meetings of the City Council at which remote public participation is offered or required under the Brown Act.

5. Procedures in the Event of a Service Disruption

5.1. Response to Service Disruption
If the Presiding Officer or Clerk becomes aware of a disruption to the agency’s remote access services that prevents members of the public from attending or observing the meeting remotely:

1. The Presiding Officer or Clerk shall immediately announce the disruption to the public.

2. The Presiding Officer may then call for a recess of the open session or convene the legislative body in closed session, consistent with the Brown Act.

3. Staff shall begin efforts to diagnose and restore the disrupted service.

4. The meeting shall remain in recess for at least one hour or until service is restored, whichever is sooner. The recess period may be extended if restoration efforts are ongoing.

5.2. Efforts to Restore Service
The agency shall make good faith efforts to restore remote access services, which may include:
• Troubleshooting platform or teleconferencing software Exhibit A
Agenda Item No. 10 Page 6 of 8 CC Agenda 06-01-2026
• Resetting or replacing audiovisual equipment
• Attempting alternative connection methods
• Contacting necessary support staff or service providers • Switching to back-up equipment or platforms, if available The Information Systems Technology staff on duty shall document the restoration efforts undertaken.

6. Reconvening the Open Session

6.1. Timing
The open session may be reconvened after at least one hour has elapsed from the time of disruption or as soon as service is restored, whichever occurs earlier.

6.2. If Service Is Restored
If the remote access service is restored before or at the time the meeting reconvenes, the meeting shall continue as normal.

6.3. If Service Is Not Restored
If service has not been restored after one hour, the City Council may reconvene and:

1. Adjourn the meeting; or

2. Continue the meeting in open session by adopting, by roll call vote, the following, or a substantially similar, finding:
“The City of Port Hueneme has made good faith efforts to restore telephonic or internet service in accordance with its adopted policy, and the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote public access.” Upon adoption of the finding, the legislative body may continue the open session despite the fact that remote access services have not been restored.

7. Recordkeeping
The Clerk shall enter a brief statement into the meeting minutes, including the following:
• The nature and time of the disruption
• The restoration efforts undertaken
• The time the meeting was reconvened (if applicable)
• Any finding adopted pursuant to Section 6.3

8. Review and Updates
This policy may be amended by the City Council at a noticed public meeting in open session, not on the consent calendar.

Agenda Item No. 10 Page 7 of 8 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Dated:

Georgianna Nicole Alvarez
City Clerk
Agenda Item No. 10 Page 8 of 8 CC Agenda 06-01-2026

Port Hueneme City CouncilJune 1, 2026

Port Hueneme City Council
June 1, 2026