Rancho Cordova City Council
September 18, 2023

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Based on projections included in the Table 11 above, the City is not projected to experience larger increase in the size of these storm events and, therefore, not likely experience widespread flooding impacts from frequent but smaller storm events in the future. The small increases in the frequency and maximum duration of storm events are also not likely to have an impact on the City’s stormwater management system.

Large Storm Events and Flood Protection
For this analysis the FEMA floodplain for the 100-year storm event is used as the sensitivity threshold for large storm events. Specifically, for future scenarios in which the intensity of the 100-year storm events is exceeded, parcels and roadways within these floodplains are seen to be at increased risk from large storm events. Based on information in Table 11, the City is not projected to experience increases in the intensity of the 100-year storm event and, therefore would likely not experience widespread flooding impacts from less frequent but larger storm events based on the Cal-Adapt data. However, as discussed above, California does experiment Atmospheric River events The presence of that contribute to the frequency of “wet years” in the state. While research indicates that the frequency of large storms events does increase in these wet years, the largest flooding impacts are caused by persistent storm sequences on sub-seasonal timescales (i.e., short time periods, typically 2 weeks to 3 months), which bring a significant fraction of annual average precipitation over a brief period (Swain et al. 2018). As noted in the Fourth Climate Change Assessment Sacramento Valley Report, climate change is projected to increase the intensity of “wet years” when they do occur and would likely have significant impacts on the County as well as the City.

Levee System Impacts
Increases in precipitation and particularly in the intensity and frequency of extreme precipitations due to climate change will have impacts on the integrity of levee systems (Jasim et al. 2017). Shifts in the IDF curve, particularly during multi-day events, can increase the risk of levee failure. A study which modeled the impacts of projected changes in IDF curves on the Elkhorn Levee in the County found that the probability of levee failure could increase between 3 and 12 percent during projected extreme precipitation events under the high emissions scenario when compared to the baseline scenario. Levee systems, particularly systems not maintained through the Federally protected levee system, are subject to other factors which can comprise their structural integrity including land subsidence and climatic conditions, which will be exacerbated by climate change (Jasim et al. 2017). The combination of land subsidence and specific climatic conditions including drought and severe flooding can further threaten the structural integrity of these aging levees (Robinson and Vahedifard 2016). There are currently two levees in the City which protect residential neighborhoods: Cordova Meadows Levee and Sunriver Levee. Based on the research referenced above, these levee systems will be at increased risk of failure due to increasingly intense storm events as well as increases in the frequency of these events.

Potential Impact Score
Based on this analysis, the potential impact score for Precipitation and Flooding is High.

2.4 DROUGHT AND WATER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
Existing and Future Drought Conditions
Long-term drought can have environmental, agricultural, health, economic, and social consequences. The County, along with larger areas of California, experiences periods of long-term drought that stress the ecosystem and water supplies; and subsequently, impact agriculture, public health, and the economy. The City relies on regional water supplies with the three primary water purveyors providing services within the City’s planning area: Sacramento County Water Agency; Golden State Water Company; and California-American Water Company. The City’s water supply is currently provided by a combination of ground and surface water resources. As discussed in the Natural Resources Chapter of the City’s General Plan, future water supplies will be provided from a variety of sources, including: water from the Central Valley Project; appropriate water supplies; water transfer supplies; groundwater; ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

recycled water; surface water from the American River; SMUD transfer water; and Aerojet replacement water due contamination of the portion of the City’s groundwater resources (City of Rancho Cordova 2006).

As noted in Appendix C – Water Supply Evaluation of the City’s General Plan (City of Rancho Cordova 2006), it is likely that adequate water supplies would be available to meet the City’s water demands associated with buildout of its current corporate limits. However, based on total known future supplies there would be a supply shortfall of approximately 51,089 acre feet per year to meet the City’s total planning area demands. This shortfall would occur if development exceeded the total amount associated with buildout of the City’s corporate boundaries. If water supplies are not available to meet buildout water demands, the City would either need to stop approving new growth within its jurisdiction, or collaborate with regional water purveyors to investigate potential future water supply options within the context of the regional water supply planning environment (City of Rancho Cordova 2006). Additionally, the Water Supply Evaluation conducted as part of the City’s General Plan does not consider future changes in water supply due to climate change. This analysis does not include a comprehensive assessment of the City’s water demand and available supply but rather focuses on how future changes in precipitation, temperature, and drought conditions in the County are likely to affect the City overall.

Future Changes in Precipitation Patterns and Flooding
The City and larger Sacramento region are expected to experience slight overall increases in average annual precipitation in the long-term. However, projections show the Sacramento region will experience increased variability and volatility in precipitation events, such as droughts. California has a highly variable climate that is susceptible to prolonged periods of drought, and recent research suggests that extended drought occurrence (a “mega-drought”) could become more pervasive in future decades (CEC 2021c). As discussed above in Section 2.3, precipitation patterns in California oscillate between extremely dry and wet periods. Climate change is anticipated to exacerbate these seasonal extremes with dry periods becoming dryer and wet periods becoming wetter (OPR et al. 2018). With the increased severity of oscillation between wet and dry periods and precipitation occurring over more intense but shorter periods in the year, this will reduce opportunities for groundwater recharge which ideally occurs during prolonged wet periods allowing for soil infiltration, deeper percolation, and the resulting groundwater recharge.

While a unique long-term drought scenario would likely affect the City’s overall water supply management practices, there is the potential for there still to be above average wet years within a long-term drought, as shown in Figure 8.

These above average wet years have the potential to replenish water supplies in the City’s reservoirs and help mitigate the impacts of long-term drought.

A substantial portion of the water resources supplied to the Sacramento region originates as rainfall and runoff from snowpack in the northern Sierra Nevada mountains and the surrounding foothills. Cal-Adapt uses data to model an extended drought scenario for all of California from 2051 to 2070. For this analysis, the extended drought scenario for El Dorado County rather than just the boundaries of the City, with tributaries in El Dorado County (i.e., the north fork and south fork of the American River) providing key water resources (e.g., Folsom Lake) to the Sacramento region.

Due to increases in climate variability and rising temperatures, the state has already seen signs of decreased snowmelt in Northern California. Annual snowpack in the Sierra Nevada is expected to decline by as much as 33 percent by mid-century and 66 percent by the end of the century, relative to historic baseline snowpack (OPR et al. 2018). Further, rising temperatures have caused snowpack to melt faster and earlier in the year. These changes in snowmelt timing and streamflow availability will challenge local and regional water supply availability (OPR et al. 2018). Inadequate rainfall and reduced snowpack will result in decreased runoff to the reservoirs that supply water to the City, which will lead to less available water and more frequent water shortages.

As shown in Figure 8, El Dorado County’s observed historical (1961-1990) average annual precipitation accumulation (i.e., rainfall and snowpack runoff) is 43.6 inches. Under the anticipated drought scenario between 2051 and 2070, the County’s average annual rainfall accumulation would decrease to 37 inches (CEC 2021c), resulting in an approximately 15 percent decrease in annual average rainfall over a 20-year period.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Figure 8 El Dorado County Long-Term Drought Scenario (2051-2070) Source: CEC 2021c.

Drought Impacts
In the event of a severe and sustained drought lasting multiple years, water supplies provided to the City could be severely affected and result in the need for increased water conservation efforts to be implemented by jurisdictions in the Sacramento region. City residents may be encouraged to reduce household water demand, which may limit certain activities such as landscape irrigation. Each water purveyor that provides water resources to the City has an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), which includes a Drought Contingency Plan with specific actions to reduce overall water use by customers. The California Public Utilities Commission sets the rates and service terms for water utilities every three years after an exhaustive review, as required by state law. As a result, a long-term drought scenario would likely not result in rapid or unforeseen increases water costs for residents and businesses.

Droughts create cascading effects on community functions that may worsen in the future. The associated risks include adverse impacts on timber harvesting, reduction in native habitat and overall ecological function, increased forest fuels for wildfire, and economic consequences associated with decreases in tourism and recreation. More intense future droughts affecting the region could result in decreasing recreation opportunities on and surrounding Folsom Lake. Decreased recreation could have a direct impact on City business revenue from pass through visitors.

Increased episodes of drought and increased water demand could result in water shortages for the region, endangering residents and ecological systems (e.g., flood control or sensitive habitat, recreational areas). Drought, as slow-moving disaster, can affect mental health if occurring over many years (Vins et al. 2015). While increasingly frequent and prolonged droughts directly affect residents, the built environment will not experience substantial direct impacts associated with this climate-related hazard.

A lack of soil moisture during long-term droughts can increase dust particle concentration, which can include harmful fungal spores and viruses, including Valley Fever (coccidioidomycosis) (OPR et al. 2018). The California Department of Public Health has highlighted the Sacramento Valley as a high-risk area for valley fever (OPR et a. 2018). Valley fever is found in disturbed, dry soil particles that must be inhaled. Symptoms of Valley Fever include chest pain, exhaustion, fever, coughing, joint and muscle pain, and difficulty breathing. Certain populations including pregnant women, the elderly, African, and Filipino Americans are particularly vulnerable to the severe cases of the disease (Brown et al. 2013).

Potential Impact Score
Based on this analysis, the potential impact score for Drought and Water Supply is Medium.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

2.5 WILDFIRE ANALYSIS
Existing and Future Wildfire Conditions
Wildfire behavior is dependent on several factors that, when identified and assessed, can help determine future wildfire characteristics. The three factors listed below contribute significantly to wildfire behavior and can be used to identify wildfire hazard areas:
 Topography: An area’s terrain and land slopes affect its susceptibility to wildfire spread. Both fire intensity and rate of spread increase as slope increases because heat from a fire tends to rise through convection. The arrangement of vegetation throughout a hillside can also contribute to increased fire activity on slopes.  Fuel: Fuel is the material that feeds a fire and is a key factor in wildfire behavior. Fuel is generally classified by type and by volume. Fuel sources are diverse and can include dead tree leaves, twigs, and branches of dead, standing trees; live trees; brush; and cured grasses. Buildings and other structures, such as homes and other associated combustibles, are also considered a fuel source.  Weather: Components such as temperature, relative humidity, wind, and occurrence of lightning affect the potential for wildfire. High temperatures and low relative humidity dry out fuels that feed wildfires, creating a situation where fuel will ignite more readily and burn more intensely. Thus, during periods of drought, the threat of wildfire increases. Wind is one of the most significant weather factors in the spread of wildfires. The greater a wind, the faster a fire will spread and the more intense it will be.

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) maps areas of significant fire hazards based on fuels, terrain, weather, and other relevant factors. These zones, referred to as Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ), are represented as Very High, High, or Moderate. The classification of a zone as a Moderate, High, or Very High FHSZ is based on a combination of how a fire would behave and the probability that flames and embers would threaten buildings. Wildfire risk is also determined by several factors, such as wind speeds, drought conditions, available wildfire fuel (i.e., dry vegetation), past wildfire suppression activity, and expanding wildland-urban interface (WUI) (i.e., places in and around forests, grasslands, shrub lands, and other natural areas) (Westerling 2018). Impacts from grass and brushfires in the City could result in evacuations of portions of the City as well as loss of property and impacts to critical facilities.

Based on data included in the City’s LHMP Annex shown in Figure 9, large portions of the eastern and southern portions of the City are located in areas designated as Moderate FHSZ. Given the City’s location and urban setting, there is relatively low risk of impacts from wildfires relative to areas northeast of the City in El Dorado and Amador County; however, the City is at increased threat of grass and brushfires. Although the majority of the City’s developed areas are at lower fire risk, the City does include a few key areas with increase fires risk in undeveloped recreation areas along the American River. As a recreation area, there are limited roadways within these areas, making fire equipment access difficult. While threatened by fire risk along the American River, residents are also at risk from health impacts from poor air quality associated with wildfire smoke. Poor air quality can be generated in the City from wildfires occurring throughout northern California as has been experienced in recent years.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Source: Sacramento County 2021 and data provided by City staff.

Figure 9 Fire Hazard Severity Zones and Critical Facilities in the City of Rancho Cordova ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Future Wildfire Risk
Increased Wildfire Risk in the Sacramento Valley
Climate change effects, including increased temperatures and changes to precipitation patterns, will exacerbate many of the factors that contribute to wildfire risk. Increased variability in precipitation may lead to wetter winters and increased vegetative growth in the spring, and longer and hotter summer periods will lead to the drying of vegetative growth and ultimately result in a greater amount of fuel for fires. This has already been seen across the state in recent years, with the area burned by wildfires increasing in parallel with rising air temperatures (OEHHA 2018). These factors, combined with intense wind conditions, cause fires to spread rapidly and irregularly, making it difficult to predict fires’ paths and effectively deploy fire suppression forces.

Relative humidity is also an important fire-related weather factor; as humidity levels drop, the dry air causes vegetation moisture levels to decrease, which consequently increases the likelihood that plant material will ignite and burn. With an increase in hotter and drier landscapes, humidity levels may continue to drop and result in higher fuel levels, increasing the risk of wildfire (Schwartz et al., 2015).

Cal-Adapt provides projections for future annual mean hectares burned within the Sacramento Valley region, as defined in the California Fourth Assessment Report, when wildfires do occur. Because the City is not directly threatened by large-scale wildfires but is likely to be impacted by regional effects such as wildfire smoke, this analysis focuses on the Sacramento Valley region. As shown in Table 12, the total area burned annually by wildfire within the Sacramento Valley region is expected increase from the historic (1961-1990) annual average of 20,956 hectares to 23,942 hectares in the near-term and increase further in the midterm to 28,759 hectares. In the long-term, average annual area burned in the region is projected to increase to 31,670 hectares and to 41,784 hectares under the low and high emissions scenarios, respectively (CEC 2021e).

Table 12 Changes in Annual Average Area Burned in the Sacramento Valley Region Average Annual Area Burned
Historic
Modeled
(1961-1990)
Near-Term
(2021-2050)
Midterm
(2035-2064)
Long-Term (2070-2099)
Low Emissions High Emissions
Average Annual Area Burned (hectares) 20,956 23,942 28,759 31,670 41,784 Notes: Observed historical average annual area burned data was not available from Cal-Adapt; the modeled historical average annual area burned data under the low emissions scenario was available and used as proxy data.

Source: CEC 2021e.

Wildfire Impact Analysis
Increased temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns associated with climate change will lead to reduced moisture content in vegetation and soils during dry years. These conditions are expected to increase the amount of area burned by wildfires that will occur predominantly outside of the City boundaries but may have secondary impacts on the City from wildfire smoke, disruptions to transportation behavior, or the increased prevalence of Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS).

Regional wildfires threaten energy generation and transmission infrastructure and have the capacity to damage facilities, create maintenance costs, and reduce transmission line efficiency (CAL FIRE 2020). Grid-supplied as well as locally generated electricity, which is the primary source of power for residences in the City, is provided by the Sacramento Municipal Utilities District (SMUD). Regional communications infrastructure can also be affected by wildfires, which is often located in remote locations, such as mountaintops, resulting in significant threat from wildfire.

Regional wildfires may also generate impacts on transportation behavior in the City during emergency evacuation events. This could include potential route diversion and increases in traffic congestion due to road closures from wildfire impacts or post-wildfire runoff or landslide affected roadways. While fire causes relatively insignificant direct impact on roads and highways, cracking and degradation of pavement is not uncommon.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Although the City is not at a high risk from the direct impacts of wildfires, the City’s location within the Sacramento Valley makes it susceptible to impacts of smoke from wildfires in the Sierra Nevada mountains and the coastal mountain ranges of northern California. Community public health factors that can increase the impacts of wildfire smoke include the prevalence of asthma in children and adults; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; hypertension; diabetes; obesity; and percent of population 65 years of age and older. Additionally, socioeconomic characteristics such as poverty rates, educational achievement, and unemployment rates have all been linked to the increased prevalence of underlying health conditions including depression, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes, making populations in the City with these characteristics more vulnerable to wildfire smoke impacts (Kivimäki et al. 2020).

Exposure to wildfire smoke, particularly exposure by vulnerable populations, can result in worsening of respiratory symptoms, increased rates of cardiorespiratory emergency visits, hospitalizations, and even death (Rappold et al. 2017). Increased annual average temperatures and the subsequent increase in the frequency and severity of wildfires in northern California are anticipated to result in impacts from wildfire smoke on the City’s population and vulnerable populations in particular (OPR et al. 2018).

Specific populations including linguistically isolated households, senior citizens, and individuals with disabilities or those experiencing homelessness are particularly vulnerable during evacuation events, if wildfire evacuations were to occur in the City. Impacts affecting these populations include inability to access or receive and/or understand warning messages and evacuation notices, limited ability to evacuate due to lack of mobility, limited situational understanding from cognitive conditions, and reliance on medication or treatment devices. Wildfires in the larger Sacramento region can also result in secondary impacts affecting populations. A major consequence of wildfires is post-fire flooding and debris flow. The risk of floods and debris flows after fires increases due to vegetation loss and soil exposure. These flows are a risk to life because they can occur with little warning and can exert great force on objects in their path.

Public Safety Power Shutoffs
Due to a number of recent large-scale wildfires in Northern California caused by electricity infrastructure exposed to extreme heat and high-winds, utilities have begun to implement PSPS to avoid wildfire risk. PSPS events can result in communities experiencing no electricity for multiple days and prevent individuals from using prescribed medications and treatments that rely on electricity or refrigeration. PSPS events can also result in impacts to commerce and economic losses, particularly for businesses that rely on refrigeration such as grocery stores. Hazards such as landslides, wildfires, and flooding can also affect underground natural gas pipelines, exposing and/or damaging these pipelines. The damage resulting from climate change-related hazards on electricity and natural gas infrastructure can have a greater impact on disadvantaged populations, particularly communities that are low-income or individuals who have limited mobility or lack the financial means to make repairs to their property.

Major wildfires often result in the damage to transportation infrastructure and/or closure of roadways. Combined with reduced visibility from wildfire smoke, this leads to a disruption in normal transportation networks and accessibility. Congestion that starts during a mass evacuation can lead to additional traffic management problems, which can result in delays to emergency response, evacuation, and logistical support.

Potential Impact Score
Based on this analysis, the potential impact score for Wildfire is Medium.

2.6 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
This section analyzes the City’s current capacity to address and adapt projected increase in severity and frequency of climate-related hazards. The City and regional agencies have established plans, policies, and programs that address climate change impacts. These efforts, however, do not comprehensively identify strategies that will be taken by local and regional governments to address the full scope and magnitude of potential climate impacts. Climate change will increase the frequency and severity of climate-related hazards in the future, requiring updates to emergency response, land use planning, and strategic partnerships. A summary of the regional and local planning efforts to adapt to climate change and climate-related hazards are presented below.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Existing State and Regional Planning Efforts
California Department of Transportation
The Climate Change Branch in the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Transportation Planning is responsible for overseeing the development, coordination, and implementation of climate change policies in all aspects of the Department’s decision making. In 2013, Caltrans completed its first report intended to help reduce GHG emissions and adapt the State’s transportation system to prepare for the impacts of climate change (Caltrans 2013), which includes a series of strategies to reduce the risk from various climate change impacts, including increasingly intense precipitation events.

Strategies outlined in the report include using vegetation to prevent erosion along roadways, assessing and resizing culverts to accommodate increased precipitation, coordinating with local jurisdictions regarding route closures as well as pursing individual projects included in the Caltrans District Vulnerability Assessments. In 2019, Caltrans completed the District 3 Vulnerability Assessment which provides an overview of potential climate impacts to the district’s portion of the State Highway System. The District 3 Vulnerability Assessment is part of a larger adaptation process undertaken by Caltrans to assess risk to Caltrans assets in the district and prioritize adaptation strategies from various climate impacts. The District 3 Vulnerability Assessment includes projected climate change exposure from precipitation change, flooding, temperature change, wildfire, storm surge, and sea level rise.

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the six-county Sacramento region including the 22 cities within El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba Counties.

SACOG develops the region’s long-range transportation plan which guides transportation and land use planning in the region. In 2015, SACOG adopted the Sacramento Region Transportation Climate Adaptation Plan to address how potential climate change impacts affect the region’s transportation infrastructure. The plan highlights key impacts from climate change that could occur on the Sacramento region’s transportation system in the future as well as a guiding action plan for future adaptation planning and implementation.

Sacramento County
The County completed a vulnerability assessment in 2015 that assessed the projected changes associated with climate change in the County (including the City of Rancho Cordova), including impacts from changes in precipitation patterns and increased flooding. The assessment highlighted the unique vulnerabilities of the County to climate change including projected increases in the frequency, intensity, and duration of extreme storm events as well as projected regional temperature increases leading to earlier and more rapid melting of the Sierra Nevada snowpack and subsequent increases in flow rate of surface waters in the County (Sacramento County 2021).

The County is currently working to conduct a study looking at current and future precipitation trends in the County under the influence of climate change. This work will inform an update to the County’s Drainage Manual better prepare for future changes in precipitation. The County Drainage Manual is used by incorporated cities in the County to design and build drainage and stormwater infrastructure and inform development standards.

Sacramento Public Department of Health Services
As a division of the Sacramento County Department of Health Services, Sacramento County Public Health works to promote, protect, and ensure conditions for optimal health and public safety for residents and communities in the County. As part of its work in helping prevent health impacts from extreme heat, Sacramento County Public Health conducts community education related to public health and emergency preparedness. It also has developed plans with the Sacramento Office of Emergency Services on wildfire smoke and response plans. Sacramento County Public Health has also begun to research the impacts of climate change using available tools specific to extreme heat and public health.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Sacramento Office of Emergency Services
The Sacramento County Office of Emergency Services (Sacramento OES) provides support and resources for emergency preparedness through its Sacramento Ready Program and operates the county’s Emergency Alerts Notification System. Sacramento, Yolo, and Placer County residents can use the Citizen Opt-In portal to receive critical and time-sensitive alerts regarding flooding, levee failures, severe weather, disaster events, unexpected road closures, missing persons, and evacuations of buildings or neighborhoods in specific geographic locations.

Sacramento OES coordinates with police and fire departments in the incorporated cities in the county for emergency planning and responses purposes. In regard to heat-related events, Sacramento OES focuses on the immediate effects of events; near-term risks from these events, particularly fires, droughts, and air pollution. Sacramento OES also maintains the County’s Emergency Operation Plan, which includes protocols for emergency operations during extreme heat events. Sacramento OES also develops and updates planning documents, including the County’s Evacuation Plan, Emergency Operations Plan, Mass Care and Shelter Plan, and the County’s LHMP and Annexes including the City. The City’s Annex in the LHMP includes climate change as a hazard and discusses how climate change will impact other hazards in the City, rating the likelihood of occurrence high and vulnerability to climate change as high.

Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District
The Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District (SMFD) provides fire protection services, fire suppression, inspection, plan checking, emergency transportation and medical services, public education, advanced life support, and rescue services to the City as well as the unincorporated portions of the Planning Area and southern the County. SMFD encompasses approximately 417 square miles in the southern portion of the County and includes both urban and rural areas. SMFD is the largest district in the County and the seventh largest local fire agency in the State of California. SMFD has 42 fire stations with approximately 673 paid personnel on its staff. The District includes 39 engine companies, 5 truck companies, 12 medic transportation units, 8 historical fire apparatus, 5 crash/rescue units, and various watercraft response units. In the City’s General Plan Planning Area, SMFD currently has seven fire stations.

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District The Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) is the agency responsible for monitoring air pollution in the Sacramento Valley Air Basin and for developing and administering programs to reduce air pollution levels below the health-based standards established by the State and Federal governments. SMAQMD is working to develop a UHI model to help identify sensitivities in the district to extreme heat and climate change, as well as develop and model the effects of mitigation strategies (e.g., green roofs, cool pavements). SMAQMD is also working to develop an update to the California Emissions Estimator Model and hopes to include an element to the tool that provides quantification of the benefits of climate adaptation strategies. The agency also works to provide funding from Assembly Bill 617 for the Clean Cars for All program, which provides increased access to electric vehicles for low-income residents. As part of the Plan development process, representatives from SMAQMD participated in the Heat Working Group and provided input on the development of this white paper.

Sacramento Municipal Utility District
SMUD is a publicly owned utility that provides electricity to the County and small portions of Placer County. In regard to climate change, SMUD has developed a sustainable communities program focusing on disadvantaged communities, as well as its Climate Readiness Assessment and Action Plan (SMUD 2016), which is intended to help the utility to adapt to and address climate change through community engagement, enterprise programs, capital projects, and operational initiatives. SMUD also works with the Sacramento Tree Foundation to operate the Sacramento Shade Program, which provides landscape assessments and free shade trees to SMUD customers. SMUD also operates Living Future Project Accelerator, which emphasizes sustainable commercial and residential building practices, and is beginning to work toward a land-based carbon storage program.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Sacramento Tree Foundation
The Sacramento Tree Foundation is a nonprofit organization that empowers people to plant, protect, and learn about trees in the Sacramento region. The organization has several programs that support its mission and provide services to cities and residents in the Sacramento region:
 Sacramento Shade Program – This program, in partnership with SMUD, provides free landscape assessments and up to 10 free shade trees that provide a host of benefits to the residents and the surrounding neighborhoods. The organization’s work with SMUD emphasizes planting locations and tree varieties that reflect SMUD’s goals for carbon sequestration.
 NeighborWoods Program – This program provides support to communities throughout the Sacramento region by offering expertise, training, tools, and advice to plant and protect trees in their neighborhoods.  Urban Wood Rescue Program - This program works to preserve useful life of the trees by providing logging and milling services for trees which have reached the end of their life. This lumber is then sold, providing a second life for the trees while capturing carbon sequestered during their lifetime.

The organization also conducts community outreach campaigns, utilizing door to door canvassing and community meetings to promote the benefits of the urban forest.

Existing Local Planning Efforts
City of Rancho Cordova
In 2006, the City adopted its first General Plan. The General Plan includes a Safety Element which includes goals, policies, and actions to address a set of safety issues in the City including traffic hazards, airport safety, neighborhood policing, and flooding. The following list of Goals and corresponding policies in the Safety Element help address and mitigate impacts from climate-related hazards.

GOAL S.2: Reduce the possibility of a flooding or drainage issue causing loss of life or damage to property.  Policy S.2.1: Support and encourage efforts to limit and reduce the potential for community flooding from the Cosumnes or American Rivers.
 Policy S.2.2: Manage the risk of flooding by discouraging new development located in an area that is likely to flood.
 Policy S.2.3: Discourage the creation of new parcels when the presence of easements, floodplain, marsh, or riparian habitat, and/or other features would leave insufficient land to build and operate structures. This policy shall not apply to open space lots specifically created for dedication to the City or another appropriate party for habitat protection, flood control, drainage, or wetland maintenance.  Policy S.2.4: Ensure that adequate drainage exists for both existing and new development.

GOAL S.9: Reduce the probability of fire damage to all the City’s structures.  Policy S.9.1: Cooperate with the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District (SMFD) to reduce fire hazards, assist in fire suppression, and ensure efficient emergency medical response.  Policy S.9.2: Provide infill development with adequate off-site improvements to meet onsite fire flow requirements.
 Policy S.9.3: Consider establishing mitigation fees to fund adequate fire protection and emergency medical response facilities, if such fees are critical and necessary to meet the facility funding needs of SMFD and existing methods of financing are inadequate.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

The City also has regulations within the Municipal Code, specifically, Chapter 23.716 “Landscaping,” that provides guidance for landscaping and tree planting requirements for new development in the City. Title 19, “Trees,” of the Municipal Code provides regulations regarding the preservation of public trees of local importance and mitigation of tree loss.

The City adopted their Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) in 2018. The EOP describes how the jurisdiction will manage and coordinate resources and personnel responding to emergency situations. It detailed information covering Emergency Operations Center procedures, documentation and reference and support information and includes response protocols for a comprehensive set of emergency situations including climate-related hazard events including flooding, wildland fire, and extreme heat. The document is continually evolving as the City grows with recommendations for improvement solicited and carefully considered for future revisions.

City of Rancho Cordova Public Works Department
The City’s Public Works Department supports important activities and functions within the City, which have an impact on UHI, including designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining the City’s road network and drainage systems.

The Public Works Department is also responsible for the maintenance of roadways in the City as well as the the City’s Capital Improvements Program, which includes developing, upgrading and implementing the City’s Capital Improvements Program 5-Year Plan – a list of improvement projects for various components of City operations.

City of Rancho Cordova Police Department
The Rancho Cordova Police Department is contracted through the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department to provide patrol, traffic enforcement, investigations, and administrative services to the City. Portions of the General Plan Planning Area outside the current City limits are within the Sacramento County Sheriff Department’s jurisdictional boundaries.

Summary of Adaptive Capacity
Table 13 evaluates the specific climate change effects covered under each of the plans and reports discussed above.

As shown in Table 13, multiple planning efforts have been made to address the climate change-related impacts that are expected to impact the City. Mitigation and adaptation measures for hazards including flooding, storms and extreme weather events, and wildfires and severe wind have been relatively well documented in assessments prepared previously. Other climate change hazards including impacts on human health, drought and available water supply, extreme heat and heat waves, landslides, and sea-level rise are noted in various regional planning efforts. However, these efforts do not analyze regional climate change effects consistently while developing adaptation strategies. Most of the policies provided in existing plans are broad-based strategies to reduce risk from climate change. Thus, it is important to note that specific and targeted policies should be developed to address the resilience of the most vulnerable populations and assets in the City.

Table 13 Adaptive Capacity in Existing Plans and Reports Plan or Report
Climate Change Hazard
Extreme Heat
Events
Extreme Precipitation
and Flooding
Drought and Water
Supply Wildfires
Sacramento County LHMP Annex    
City’s General Plan   
California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment Sacramento Valley Regional Report
   
Caltrans Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment District 3    City Water Purveyor’s Urban Water Management Plans 
City’s Emergency Operations Plan   
Source: Data compiled by Ascent Environmental in 2021.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Adaptive Capacity Scoring by Hazard
Based on a combination of the adaptation initiatives outlined in these documents and additional adaptive efforts that have been pursued, the City’s adaptive capacity for each climate change effect can be rated Low, Medium, or High.

High adaptive capacity indicates that sufficient measures are already in place to address the points of sensitivity and impacts associated with climate change, while a low rating indicates a community is unprepared and requires major changes to address hazards (CalOES 2020).

Increased Temperatures and Extreme Heat
Adaptive Capacity Rating: Low
The City does not generate its own electricity and may not be in a position to protect vulnerable populations from the impacts that will be caused by rising temperatures and a drastic increase in the number of extreme heat events.

As rising temperatures and extreme heat lead to more frequent electricity outages, the lack of backup power sources for residents and business will expose more residents to risk of health impacts associated with extreme heat. While the LHMP does include extreme heat as a hazard, relevant information is limited. Impacts associated with increases in temperatures and extreme heat events are the largest potential impact for the City. This means that although the City may be adequately prepared to address extreme heat events currently, the vulnerabilities faced by the City including impacts to youth, seniors, and homeless populations as well as impacts on energy demand and services are likely to exceed to City’s current capacity.

For these reasons, the adaptive capacity ranking for increased temperatures and extreme heat is Low.

Increased Wildfire Risk
Adaptive Capacity Rating: High
The County, State and regional agencies, and other partners are implementing a diverse array of policies and programs that address the design of structures, fire safety, community preparedness, and emergency response, decreasing the City’s overall vulnerability to the threat of wildfire. However, as the threat of wildfire increases both locally and regionally, the City, in coordination with federal, state, and local agencies, will need to continue to adapt to projected impacts from wildfire. While the City is at relatively low risk from direct wildfire impacts, the affects from regional wildfires on the City through secondary impacts such as wildfire smoke and regional transportation route disruptions will continue to affect the City. Because these impacts have been increasing in intensity and severity in recent years and are somewhat novel, the City will need to make moderate changes to expand its capacity to address these types of impacts.

For these reasons, the adaptive capacity associated with wildfire is high.

Increased Extreme Precipitation and Flooding
Adaptive Capacity Rating: Medium
The City has adequately assessed its flood risk through the LHMP and other planning documents. The City and stakeholders have developed, adopted, and enforced several policies and programs that will serve to mitigate impacts from increasingly frequent floods in the future. While the City’s populations and assets are not severely threatened by floods as identified in the LHMP, the City, the County and other regional and local agencies can continue to implement policies and programs that reduce the risks associated with significant flooding events. As noted in Section 2.3, the risk of a large-scale storm event similar to the Great Flood events of 1861–1862 is more likely than not occur at least once by 2060. This means that although the City is adequately prepared to address flooding events currently, an event such as this would result in widescale impacts on the City and potentially affect Folsom Dam.

Therefore, the adaptive capacity associated with increased extreme precipitation and flooding is medium.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Drought and Water Supply
Adaptive Capacity Rating: Medium
The City understands that a reliable water supply is essential. Each water purveyors that provide water resource so the City have UWMPs and Drought Contingency Plans, which will assist in building resilience to future drought conditions. The City is still somewhat vulnerable to these climate-related hazards, particularly in terms of the economic and related impacts (irrigation of recreation fields, constraints on future housing development) of generally dryer conditions, interannual precipitation variability, and reduced snowpack. These climate change effects will pose risks to tourism-related businesses that rely on pass-by visitors to Folsom Lake and the surrounding recreation areas when long-term droughts do occur.

Based on the reasons stated above, the adaptive capacity ranking for drought, water supply, and reduced snowpack is medium.

2.7 VULNERABILITY SCORING
The City’s vulnerability to each identified climate change impact is assessed based on the magnitude of risk posed to populations and assets, and any existing measures in place to mitigate these impacts. Potential impacts and adaptive capacity are rated on a qualitative scale from Low to High based on guidance from the APG. A description of each qualitative rating for both factors is provided in Table 14.

Table 14 Potential Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scoring Score Potential Impact Adaptive Capacity
Low Impact is unlikely based on projected exposure; would result in minor consequences to public health, safety, and/or other metrics of concern.

The population or asset lacks capability to manage climate impact; major changes would be required.

Medium Impact is somewhat likely based on projected exposure; would result in some consequences to public health, safety, and/or other metrics of concern.

The population or asset has some capacity to manage
climate impact; some changes would be required.

High Impact is highly likely based on projected exposure; would result in substantial consequences to public health, safety, and/or other metrics of concern.

The population or asset has high capacity to manage climate impact; minimal to no changes are required.

Source: CalOES 2020
After rating potential impacts and adaptive capacity, an overall vulnerability score is determined for each climate change impact. This scoring can help the City understand which effects pose the greatest threats and should be prioritized in future planning efforts. Table 15 presents the rubric used to determine the overall vulnerability scores based on the ratings for potential impacts and adaptive capacity.

Table 15 Vulnerability Scoring
Vulnerability Score
Potential Impacts
High 3 4 5
Medium 2 3 4
Low 1 2 3
High Medium Low
Adaptive Capacity
Source: CalOES 2020.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Vulnerability scoring for each climate change effect identified and evaluated in Sections 2.2 through 2.6 is included in Table 16 below. The table shows that increased temperatures and extreme heat is assigned a vulnerability rating of 5 and therefore should be a high priority for the City. Impacts from increased precipitation and flooding was scored as a 4 while drought and water supply risks was assigned a vulnerability score of 3. These climate change effects are likely to have significant impacts on the City’s populations, built environment, and community functions in the nearterm, and although a variety of adaptive efforts related to both climate change effects are in place and underway, the magnitude of the risks posed by these hazards contributes to high vulnerability in the City. Increased wildfire risk is characterized as having a vulnerability rating of 2. This climate change effect will likely have lower priority impacts on the City and is currently being addressed adequately based on existing conditions, but additional adaptation and resilience planning will be required in the future to mitigate impacts and protect the City.

Table 16 Vulnerability Scoring Summary
Vulnerability Score
Climate Change Effect Vulnerability Score
Adaptive Capacity Potential Impact Vulnerability
Temperature and Extreme Heat Low High 5
Precipitation and Flooding Medium High 4
Drought and Water Supply Medium Medium 3
Wildfire High Medium 2
Source: CalOES 2020; adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2021.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

3 REFERENCES
Brown, C. J., Saunders, M. I., Possingham, H. P., and Richardson, A. J. 2013. Managing for interactions between local and global stressors of ecosystems. PloS one, 8(6), e65765.

California Environmental Protection Agency. 2019. Urban Heat Island Interactive Maps, Sacramento County.

CAL FIRE. See California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2020. 2020 Strategic Fire Plan. Accessed February 21, 2021.

California Department of Transportation. 2013 (February). Addressing Climate Change Adaptation in Regional Transportation Plans: A Guide for California MPOs and RTPAs.

California Energy Commission. 2018a. California Heat Assessment Tool. Available: https://www.cal-heat.org/explore.

Accessed October 18, 2019.
———. 2018b. Projected Changes in California’s Precipitation Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves. ———. 2021a. Cal-Adapt Annual Averages Tool. Available: https://cal-adapt.org/tools/annual-averages/ Accessed December 28, 2020.
———. 2021b. Cal-Adapt Extreme Heat Tool. Available: https://cal-adapt.org/tools/extreme-heat/ Accessed December 28, 2020.
———. 2021c. Cal-Adapt Extended Drought Scenario Tool. Available: https://cal-adapt.org/tools/extended-drought/ Accessed December 28, 2020.
———. 2021d. Cal-Adapt Snowpack Tool. Available: https://caladapt.org/tools/snowpack/#climatevar=swe&scenario=rcp45&lat=38.90625&lng=- 120.03125&boundary=locagrid&units=inch Accessed December 28, 2020 ———. 2021e. Cal-Adapt Wildfire Tool. Availablehttps://cal-adapt.org/tools/wildfire/ Accessed December 28, 2020.

Cal OES. See California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services.

California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services. 2020. California Adaptation Planning Guide. Available:
https://www.caloes.ca.gov/HazardMitigationSite/Documents/APG2-FINAL-PR-DRAFTAccessible.pdf.

Accessed February 12, 2021.

California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, California Energy Commission, and California Natural Resources Agency. 2018. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment Report: Sacramento Valley Region Report. Available: https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Reg_Report-SUM-CCCA4-2018- 002_SacramentoValley_ADA.pdf. Accessed January 29, 2021.

California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2018. Indicators of Climate Change in California.

Cambridge Systematics. 2015. Central Texas Extreme Weather and Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment of Regional Transportation Infrastructure. Available:
https://austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/CAMPO_Extreme_Weather_Vulnerability_Assessment_FINAL.pd f. Accessed February 11, 2021.

Calkins, M. M., T. B. Isaksen, B. A. Stubbs, M. G. Yost, and R. A. Fenske. 2016. Impacts of Extreme Heat on Emergency Medical Service Calls in King County, Washington, 2007–2012: Relative Risk and Time Series Analyses of Basic and Advanced Life Support. Environmental Health.

Caltrans. See California Department of Transportation.

CDPH. See California Department of Public Health.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

CDC. See Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

CEC. See California Energy Commission.

CEC and CNRA. See California Energy Commission and California Natural Resources Agency.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. Protecting Vulnerable Groups from Extreme Heat [website].

Available: https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/specificgroups.html. Accessed December 2, 2019.

City of Rancho Cordova. 2006. City of Rancho Cordova General Plan.

CNRA. See California Natural Resources Agency.

DWR. See California Department of Water Resources.

Federal Highway Administration. 2015 (August). Climate Change Adaptation for Pavements ———. 2017. Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Framework. Third edition.

FHWA. See Federal Highway Administration.

Goosse, H., P. Y. Barriet, M. F. Loutre, and V. Zunz. 2010. Introduction to Climate Dynamics and Climate Modeling.

Centre de Recherche sur la Terre et le Climat Georges Lemaître-UCLouvain.

Harvey, J., A. Chong, and J. Roesler. 2000. Climate Regions for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design in California and Expected Effects on Performance. University of California, Berkeley. Prepared for California Department of Transportation.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. Available:
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full.pdf. Accessed February 11, 2021. ———. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5 Degrees Celsius: An IPCC Special Report. Available:
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_High_Res.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2021.
———. 2021. Climate Change Six Assessment: Summary Report for Policy Makers. Available:
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM.pdf Accessed September 5, 2021.

IPCC. See Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Jasim, F. H., F. Vehedifard, E. Ragno., A. AghaKouchak, and G. Ellithy. 2017. Effects of Climate Change on Fragility Curves of Earthen Levees Subjected to Extreme Precipitations. Geo-Risk 2017 Conference Paper.

Kivimäki, M., Batty, G. D., Pentti, J., Shipley, M. J., Sipilä, P. N., Nyberg, S. T., & Vahtera, J. 2020. Association between socioeconomic status and the development of mental and physical health conditions in adulthood: a multicohort study. The Lancet Public Health, 5(3), e140-e149.

Knowlton, K., J. E. Rosenthal, C. Hogrefe, B. Lynn, S. Gaffin, R. Goldberg, C. Rosenzweig, K. Civerolo, J.-Y. Ku, and P. L.

Kinney. 2004. Assessing Ozone-Related Health Impacts under a Changing Climate. Environmental Health Perspectives 112(15):1557–1563.

Kovats, R. S., and S. Hajat. 2008. Heat Stress and Public Health: A Critical Review. Annual Review of Public Health 29:41–

55. Li, Q., L. Mills, and S. McNeil. 2011 (September 25). The Implications of Climate Change on Pavement Performance and Design. Submitted to the University of Delaware University Transportation Center.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2018. What’s the Difference Between Weather and Climate? Available: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/news/weather-vs-climate. Accessed February 8, 2020.

NOAA. See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research. 2002. Weather Information for Surface Transportation: National Needs Assessment Report. FCM-R18-2002.

OPR, CEC, and CNRA. See California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, California Energy Commission, and California Natural Resources Agency.

OPR. See California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research.

Paterson, J., P. Berry, K. Ebi, and L. Varangu. 2014. Health Care Facilities Resilient to Climate Change Impacts.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11(12):13097–13116.

Pierce, D., J. F. Kalansky, and D. R. Cayan. 2018. Climate, Drought, and Sea Level Rise Scenarios for California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment.

Ramin, B., and Svoboda, T. 2009. Health of the homeless and climate change. Journal of Urban Health, 86(4), 654- 664.

Rappold, A. G., J. Reyes, G. Pouliot, W. E. Cascio, and D. Diaz-Sanchez. 2017. Community Vulnerability to Health Impacts of Wildland Fire Smoke Exposure. Environmental Science & Technology 51(12):6674-6682.

Rinner, C., and M. Hussain. 2011. Toronto’s Urban Heat Island—Exploring the Relationship between Land Use and Surface Temperature. Remote Sensing 3(6):1251–1265.

Robinson, J. D., and F. Vahedifard. 2016. Weakening Mechanisms Imposed on California’s Levees under Multiyear Extreme Drought. Climatic Change 137(1–2):1–14.

Sacramento County. 2016. Standard Construction Specifications. Available:
https://saccountyspecs.saccounty.net/Documents/PDF%20Documents%202016/2016CompleteSpec.pdf Accessed September 14, 2021.
———. 2021. Draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Available: https://waterresources.saccounty.net/Pages/Drainage-- Draft-Local-Hazard-Mitigation-Plan-Report.aspx. Accessed September 14, 2021.

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District. 2017. Air Quality Pollutants and Standards – Ozone.

Available: http://www.airquality.org/air-quality-health/air-quality-pollutants-and-standards. Accessed November 6, 2019.

Sacramento Municipal Utility District. 2016 (November). Climate Readiness Assessment and Action Plan.

Sailor, D. J. 2011. A Review of Methods for Estimating Anthropogenic Heat and Moisture Emissions in the Urban Environment. International Journal of Climatology 31:189–199.

SMAQMD. See Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District.

SMUD. See Sacramento Municipal Utility District.

Schwartz, M. W., N. Butt, C. R. Dolanc, A. Holguin, M. A. Moritz, M. P. North, H. D. Safford, N. L. Stephenson, J. H.

Thorne, and P. J. van Mantgem. 2015. Increasing elevation of fire in the Sierra Nevada and implications for forest change. Available: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1890/ES15-00003.1. Accessed February 5, 2021.

Solecki, W. D., C. Rosenzweig, L. Parshall, G. Pope, M. Clark, J. Cox, and M. Wiencke. 2005. Mitigation of the Heat Island Effect in Urban New Jersey. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards 6(1):39–49.

Stone, B., Jr., and M. O. Rodgers. 2001. Urban Form and Thermal Efficiency: How the Design of Cities Influences the Urban Heat Island Effect. Journal of the American Planning Association 67(2):186–198.

Swain, D. L., D. E. Horton, D. Singh, and N. S. Diffenbaugh. 2016. Trends in Atmospheric Patterns Conducive to Seasonal Precipitation and Temperature Extremes in California. Science Advances 2(4): e1501344.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

City of Rancho Cordova Vulnerability Assessment

Swain, D. L., B. Langenbrunner, J. D. Neelin, and A. Hall. 2018. Increasing Precipitation Volatility in Twenty-FirstCentury California. Nature Climate Change 8:427–433.

Transportation Research Board and National Research Council. 2008. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on U.S.

Transportation. Special Report 290. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

U.S. Census. 2021. Quickfacts: Rancho Cordova City, California. Available:
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/ranchocordovacitycalifornia. Accessed September 11, 2021.

Planning.

U.S. Department of Energy. 2016. Climate Change and the Electricity Sector: Guide for Climate Change Resilience Planning.

U.S. Department of Transportation. 2014. Transportation Climate Change Sensitivity Matrix.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies Vins, H., Bell, J., Saha, S., and Hess, J. J. 2015. The mental health outcomes of drought: a systematic review and causal process diagram. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12(10), 13251-13275.

Voelkel, J., D. Hellman, R. Sakuma, and V. Shandas. 2018. Assessing Vulnerability to Urban Heat: A Study of Disproportionate Heat Exposure and Access to Refuge by Socio-Demographic Status in Portland, Oregon.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(4):10.3390/ijerph15040640.

Westerling, A. L. 2018. Wildfire Simulations for the Fourth California Climate Assessment: Projecting Changes in Extreme Wildfire Events with a Warming Climate. University of California, Merced, California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment, California Energy Commission. Available:
https://climateassessment.ca.gov/events/docs/20181210-Slides_Westerling.pdf. Accessed February 11, 2021.

Zhu, R., M. S. Wong, É. Guilbert, and P. W. Chan. 2017. Understanding Heat Patterns Produced by Vehicular Flows in Urban Areas. Scientific Reports 7:article number 16309.

Zhu, P., and Y. Zhang. 2008. Demand for Urban Forests in United States Cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 84(3– 4):293–300.

Zimmerman, R. 1996. Global Warming, Infrastructure, and Land Use in the Metropolitan New York Area: Prevention and Response. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 790(1):57–83.

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

Appendix G
List of Potential Funding Options
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

Rancho Cordova
Climate Action & Adaptation Plan Page G-1
List of Potential Funding Options for CAAP Implementation Funding Option Description Potential CAAP
Implementation
Sacramento Municipal
Utility District (SMUD)
Residential Rebates
SMUD provides residential rebates and special promotions for energy efficient appliances and products including induction cooktops/ranges, heat pump water heater upgrades, ENERGY STAR® clothes washers and refrigerators, smart thermostats, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) replacement with a heat pump, smart lighting starter kits, energy savings kits, power strips, LED bulbs, faucet aerators, showerheads, water conservation kits, smart sprinkler controllers, and drip irrigation retrofit kits. SMUD also offers residents a discounted electric rate to support EV charging, funding for home EV charging equipment and installation, and a managed EV charging program to support vehicle charging when demand is low.

Building Energy
Sector; Water Sector;
On-Road
Transportation Sector
Sacramento Municipal
Utility District (SMUD)
Business Rebates
SMUD provides business rebates for lighting, refrigeration, and heating or cooling (HVAC) systems through several different rebate programs, including a program specific to multifamily residential properties. It also provides electric vehicle (EV) programs for commercial vehicles and EV charging, an electric forklift incentive pilot program, and SMUD eFuelSM Services to assess, design, construct and maintain electric vehicle chargers for commercial customers interested in business/fleet electric vehicles and charging, workplace employee charging or multi-family tenant charging.

Building Energy
Sector; On-Road
Transportation
Sector; Off Road
Vehicles and
Equipment Sector
DOE Energy Efficiency
and Conservation
Block Grant (EECBG)
Program
Part of the DOE’s State and Community Energy Program (SCEP), the EECBG program provides formula grants to local governments to implement strategies to reduce fossil fuel emissions, decrease total energy use, and improve energy efficiency. The funds will consist a twoyear budget period for local governments. Rancho Cordova’s allocation is $138,900.

Building Energy
Sector
California Energy
Commission 1 Percent
Interest Rate Loans
The California Energy Commission offers 1 percent loans for local jurisdictions to conduct projects with proven energy savings at municipal facilities.

Building Energy
Sector
California Lending for
Energy and
Environmental Needs
(CLEEN)
This funding source, as a program of California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, provides direct public financing to municipalities, universities, schools, and hospitals to help meet the state’s goals for GHG reductions, water conservation, and environmental preservation.

Building Energy
Sector
California Energy
Commission Electric
Program Investment
Charge Program (EPIC)
The EPIC program provides more than $130 million annually in grants to both public agencies and private entities for the development and deployment of renewable energy, clean electric building and transportation, energy resilience, and advanced grid technologies in to accelerate the transformation of the electricity sector.

Building Energy
Sector
GRID Alternatives
GRID Alternatives is a nonprofit organization that provides no-cost solar installations to low-income residents and provides assistance for communities in developing multifamily and community-scale solar installations. The organization also provides hands-on job training for volunteers interested in employment in the solar industry.

Building Energy
Sector
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

Rancho Cordova
Page G-2 Climate Action & Adaptation Plan
List of Potential Funding Options for CAAP Implementation Funding Option Description Potential CAAP
Implementation
California Department
of Community Services
and Development,
Low-Income
Weatherization
Program
Administered by the California Department of Community Services and Development, the Low-Income Weatherization Program provides lowincome households with solar photovoltaic (PV) systems and energy efficiency upgrades at no cost to residents. The program is designed with the primary goal of reducing GHG emissions by saving energy and generating clean renewable energy while reducing energy costs for lowincome single-family households and multi-family affordable housing.

Building Energy
Sector
Building Initiative for
Low-Emissions
Development (BUILD)
Program
The CA Energy Commission’s Building Initiative for Low-Emissions Development (BUILD) Program is designed to provide technical assistance and incentives for new all-electric low-income residential buildings that reduce GHG emissions.

Building Energy
Sector
Federal Inflation
Reduction Act (IRA) of
2022
The IRA invests nearly $400 billion in Energy Security and Climate Change programs over the next ten years. This includes rebates and tax credits for energy efficiency, renewable energy, and clean vehicle purchases, as well as funding for clean power infrastructure and climate resiliency.

Building Energy
Sector
HUD Community
Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Program
The HUD CDBG Program supports community development activities to build stronger and more resilient communities. Activities may address needs such as infrastructure, economic development projects, public facilities installation, community centers, housing rehabilitation, public services, clearance/acquisition, microenterprise assistance, code enforcement, and homeowner assistance.

Building Energy
Sector
Federal Infrastructure
Investment and
Jobs Act, aka
Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law
(BIL) or “Building a
Better America”
The U.S. Department of Transportation announced the availability of nearly $3 billion in competitive grant funding for surface transportation projects that were included in the infrastructure law. The grants can fund projects too large or complex for traditional funding programs like multijurisdictional and multimodal projects. The BIL also invests in clean energy by modernizing the power grid, weatherize and upgrade homes, schools, and businesses to make them cleaner and more affordable, and in the creation of new programs to support the development of clean energy technology. It will also invest in broadband infrastructure development to provide access to reliable high-speed internet.

On-road
Transportation
Sector; Building
Energy Sector
Rebuilding American
Infrastructure with
Sustainability and
Equity (RAISE) Grants
The U.S. Department of Transportation is offering $1.5 billion in grant funding through the RAISE discretionary grant program. The program uses a merit-based process to select projects that will build and repair critical pieces of freight and passenger transportation networks.

On-road
Transportation Sector
Caltrans Active
Transportation
Planning Program
This program provides competitive planning grants for jurisdictions working on planning projects to increase the proportion of trips accomplished by biking and walking and reduce community-wide vehicle miles traveled.

On-road
Transportation Sector
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

Rancho Cordova
Climate Action & Adaptation Plan Page G-3
List of Potential Funding Options for CAAP Implementation Funding Option Description Potential CAAP
Implementation
Caltrans
Transportation
Planning Grant
Program
The Transportation Planning Grant Program provides competitive planning grants to help local jurisdictions in a variety of transportation planning efforts including development and implementation of regional transportation plans. The program also helps address multimodal transportation deficiencies with a focus on transit and support planning actions that advance climate adaptation efforts for local transportation systems.

On-road
Transportation Sector
Caltrans Clean
California Local Grant
Program
The Clean California Local Grant Program provides competitive grants to projects that beautify and improve local roads, parks, pathways, and transit centers. Cycle 2 of grants includes up to $100 million in funding.

On-road
Transportation
Sector; Natural and
Urban landscapes
California Clean
Vehicle Rebate Project
(CVRP)
This California Air Resources Board program provides rebates for the purchase or lease of a new, eligible zero-emission or plug-in hybrid vehicle. As of February 28, 2023, increased rebate amounts have been updated to $7,500 for battery electric and fuel cell electric vehicles and $6,500 for plug-in hybrid vehicles.

On-road
Transportation Sector
Strategic Growth
Council Affordable
Housing and
Sustainable
Communities Program
This program, administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development, funds land use, housing, transportation, and land preservation projects that support infill and compact development and reduce GHG emissions. Funds are available in the form of loans and/or grants in two kinds of project areas: TransitOriented Development Project Areas and Integrated Connectivity Project Areas.

On-road
Transportation Sector
SB 2 Planning Grant
Program
This planning grant program provides financial and technical assistance to local governments to update planning documents and zoning ordinances, including general plans, community plans, specific plans, sustainable communities strategies, and local coastal programs, to streamline housing production. The program does not use a competitive process to award funds. All localities that meet the eligibility requirements outlined in the grant application receive funding.

On-road
Transportation Sector
Volkswagen (VW)
Environmental
Mitigation Trust
The VW Environmental Mitigation Trust provides about $423 million for California to mitigate the excess nitrogen oxide emissions by funding specified eligible actions focused mostly on “scrap and replace” projects for the heavy-duty sector, including on-road freight trucks, transit and shuttle buses, school buses, forklifts and port cargo handling equipment, commercial marine vessels, and freight switcher locomotives.

On-road
Transportation
Sector; Off-Road
Vehicles and
Equipment Sector
California Air
Resources Board Carl
Moyer Memorial Air
Quality Standards
Attainment Program
The Carl Moyer Program provides grant funds towards the replacement of old, high-polluting vehicles, engines, and equipment, with new technologies that are cleaner than required or earlier than required by rules and regulations. The Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District implements this program in the Sacramento region.

On-road
Transportation
Sector; Off-Road
Vehicles and
Equipment Sector
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

Rancho Cordova
Page G-4 Climate Action & Adaptation Plan
List of Potential Funding Options for CAAP Implementation Funding Option Description Potential CAAP
Implementation
CalRecycle Food
Waste Prevention and
Rescue Grant Program
The purpose of this competitive grant program is to reduce overall GHG emissions by establishing new or expanding existing food waste prevention projects (source reduction or food rescue for people) in California to reduce the amount of food being disposed of in landfills.

Solid Waste Sector
CalRecycle Local
Enforcement Agency
Grant Program
CalRecycle administers a non-competitive grant program to assist local enforcement agencies with their solid waste facilities permit and inspection program.

Solid Waste Sector
California Department
of Water Resources
Water Grant and
Loans
The California Department of Water Resources provides a number of grant and loan programs that support integrated watershed management. These funds can be used to address issues such as groundwater sustainability, drought, and water supply reliability.

Programs include the Small Communities Drought Relief Program, the Riverine Stewardship Program, Delta Levees Special Flood Control Projects Program, and the LandFlex Program.

Water Sector
CivicSpark Program
The CivicSpark Program supports sustainability-focused research, planning, and implementation projects throughout California by providing public agencies and other organizations with high-quality capacity-building support. This 11-month AmeriCorps program employs highly motivated emerging sustainability professionals.

Green Economy;
Public Participation &
Engagement
Regional Early Action
Planning (REAP)
REAP allows councils of governments and other regional entities to collaborate on projects that have a broader regional impact on housing.

The grant funding helps regional entities and governments facilitate local housing production that will assist local governments in meeting their Regional Housing Need Allocation.

On-road
Transportation Sector
Sustainable
Transportation Equity
Project (STEP)
STEP is a new transportation equity pilot that aims to address community residents’ transportation needs, increase access to key destinations, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by funding planning, clean transportation, and supporting projects.

STEP’s overarching purpose is to increase transportation equity in disadvantaged and low-income communities throughout California via two types of grants: Planning and Capacity Building Grants and Implementation Grants. Within these two grant types, CARB currently has up to $22 million available.

On-road
Transportation Sector
Infrastructure State
Revolving Fund (ISRF)
The California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank provides loans to local governments for infrastructure and economic development. ISRF has financed projects that are vital to communities throughout the state such as city and county street highway improvements, wastewater treatment plant construction and upgrades, and educational and cultural facilities.

On-road
Transportation
Sector; Buildings and
Energy sector; Water
and Wastewater
Sector; Solid Waste
Sector
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

Rancho Cordova
Climate Action & Adaptation Plan Page G-5
List of Potential Funding Options for CAAP Implementation Funding Option Description Potential CAAP
Implementation
CAL FIRE’s Grant
Programs
CAL FIRE provides a number of grant programs such as the wildfire prevention grant program, the business and workforce development through wood products and bioenergy program, the California forest improvement program, the forest health program, the forest health research program, forest legacy program, and the urban and community forestry program. Funding and application dates can be found on their website https://www.fire.ca.gov/grants/. .

Adaptation
OPR Regional
Resilience Planning
and Implementation
Grant Program (RRGP)
The ICARP Regional Resilience Planning and Implementation Grant Program (Regional Resilience Grant Program, or RRGP) will fund local public entities, California Native American Tribes, and Community-Based Organizations that are planning and implementing projects that advance climate resilience and respond to the greatest climate risks in their regions. Over multiple funding rounds, the RRGP will invest $125 million into regions advancing resilience and responding to their regions’ greatest climate risks through three major activities: capacity building, planning (including identifying climate resilience priorities), and project implementation.

The first grant cycle will invest $21.3 million. At least $12.5 million of that total will be for regions planning for climate adaptation and developing action plans that prioritize projects or actions addressing the greatest climate risks facing a region, particularly in the most vulnerable communities. Grants will be made available both competitively and on a formula basis. Application period begins in Spring 2023.

Adaptation
SGC Transformative
Climate Communities
(TCC)
The Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) Program funds development and infrastructure projects that achieve major environmental, health, and economic benefits in California’s most disadvantaged communities. More info here: Transformative Climate Communities: Community-led transformation for a sustainable California
All sectors
SGC Community
Assistance for Climate
Equity (CACE)
The SGC’s CACE Program provides technical assistance and capacity building services to help under-resourced communities foster successful climate projects. Within CACE, the Boost Program supports underresourced local governments in building capacity, optimizing existing resources, strengthening community partnerships, and transforming their approach to address and fund climate activities.

All sectors
SGC Community
Resilience Centers
(CRC) Grants Program
SGC’s CRC program will fund new construction and upgrades of neighborhood-level resilience centers to provide shelter and resources during climate and other emergencies. The program will also fund yearround services and ongoing programming that build overall community resilience. More info here: Community Resilience Centers Program:

Strengthening community resilience in neighborhoods across California Adaptation
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

Rancho Cordova
Page G-6 Climate Action & Adaptation Plan
List of Potential Funding Options for CAAP Implementation Funding Option Description Potential CAAP
Implementation
Climate Resilience
Districts Act (Senate
Bill 852)
Senate Bill 852 (Dodd, 2022) established the “Climate Resilience District”. This is a new public financing tool available to cities, counties, and special districts to undertake projects and programs to address climate change including wildfire, sea level rise, extreme heat and cold, drought, flooding, and related issues. The districts can be formed by one or public agencies and, once created, can raise revenue through tax increment funding, voter-approved supplemental property taxes, property benefit assessments, or fees.

Adaptation
CA Climate & Energy
Collaborative (CCEC)
Funding Resources
The CCEC provides several helpful resources to support funding for implementation of local climate and energy initiatives. These include a “How to Guide: Ways to Get Funded” resource that outlines both internal and external funding best practices (see Ways to get Funded – California Climate and Energy Collaborative (eecoordinator.info), as well as a regularly-updated list of current and upcoming funding opportunities with links (see Funding Resources – California Climate and Energy Collaborative (eecoordinator.info).

California Grants
Portal
The California Grants Portal (a project by the California State Library) is a one-stop destination to find all grants and loans offered on a competitive or first-come basis by California state agencies. See: Home - California Grants Portal
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 5

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 3

ITEM 11.1.

DATE: September 18, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Stacy Leitner, City Clerk
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT BOUNDARY MAPS OF COUNCIL

DISTRICTS AND FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING

FOR THE ELECTION OF COUNCIL MEMBERS BY FIVE DISTRICTS

AND ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARIES AND ELECTION ORDER

OF EACH DISTRICT

RECOMMENDATION

1. Open the public hearing, receive public comments, close the public hearing, provide feedback to the demographic consultant and staff regarding the draft Council District boundary maps.

2. Vote to designate a preferred map, designate the sequence and preferred election years for each district to be included in the proposed Ordinance.

3. Waive the first reading and introduce the proposed Ordinance, as revised by the Council direction in Step 2 above, establishing five districts for election of five City Council Members, which would continue the practice of the City Council annually appointing a member of the City Council to serve for one year as Mayor of the City and amending and adding new sections to Chapter 2.42 Elections of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code to provide for City Council Election Districts.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Consultant will present the draft Council District boundary maps received for Council to consider and designate a preferred map establishing five districts for election of five City Council Members. The City Council will also designate the sequence and preferred election years for each district, and vote to introduce the proposed ordinance establishing five districts for election of five City Council Members. Designating five districts would continue the practice of the City Council annually appointing a member of the City Council to serve for one year as Mayor of the City. This action would also amend and add sections to Chapter 2.42 Elections of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code to provide for City Council Election Districts.

BACKGROUND
The City Council was elected under an at-large election system, whereby Council Members are elected by voters of the entire City. On June 7, 2023, the City received a letter from attorney Scott J. Rafferty asserting that the at-large election system violates the California Voting Rights

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 3

Act (CVRA) and threatened litigation if the City declines to voluntarily convert to district-based elections. District-based elections is a method of electing the members to the City Council in which the candidate must reside within an election district and is elected only by voters residing within that election district.

On July 17, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 108-2023 initiating the process to consider changing to a district-based election system. To assist with the transition from an atlarge to a district-based election system, the City entered into an agreement with National Demographics Corporation (NDC). Since that time, the City has engaged in an extensive public engagement process to identify communities of interest and to encourage the community to provide input on the transition and on the specific election district maps.

The public engagement process included messaging through the City’s website, newspapers, flyers, a postcard mailed to residences, social media, a website dedicated to district-based elections, and outreach to organizations in the City. Language translation was also available in Spanish and Russian. As a result of the extensive public outreach, the City initially received a total of thirty-two (32) maps submitted by members of the public, including twenty (20) fivedistrict maps, seven (7) six-district maps, and five (5) seven-district maps. One (1) seven-district map was prepared by the City’s consultant based on the public comments, applicable legal standards, and other relevant factors. Thirteen (13) of the submitted maps were either duplicates, not population balanced, or raised concerns around the Fair and Inclusive Redistricting for Municipalities and Political Subdivisions (FAIR MAPS) Act, resulting in twenty (20) unique, contiguous, population-balanced draft maps.

The City held community forums to solicit public comment on this transition on August 10, 2023, and August 30, 2023. City Council public hearings were held on August 7, 2023, and August 14, 2023, to receive input regarding the composition of the City’s voting districts before any draft maps were drawn. At the City Council public hearing held on August 29, 2023, and this evening on September 18, 2023, the public has been invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps released at least seven (7) days before each meeting, and the proposed sequence of elections.

After receiving public input at the August 29, 2023, public hearing, the Council narrowed the list of draft maps under consideration from the initial twenty (20) unique, contiguous, populationbalanced draft maps to three (3) focus maps: Map 508b (revised version of Map 508 drawn to incorporate Council direction at the public hearing), Map 511, and Map 516b (revised version of Map 516 drawn to incorporate Council direction at the public hearing). Furthermore, Map 508c (revised version of Map 508) and Map 516c (revised version of Map 516) were subsequently created by NDC because the City Council's original direction at the August 29, 2023, public hearing created a map that NDC later determined was not population-balanced. Each of these five (5) focus maps, Map 508b, Map 508c, Map 511, Map 516b, and Map 516c have five districts. By selecting a five-district map, the City would continue the practice of the City Council annually appointing a member of the City Council to serve for one year as Mayor of the City.

The proposed sequencing, which is the timeline for implementing the district-based election system, is as follows, depending on which map the Council selects:

Year Maps 508b & 508c Map 511 Maps 516b & 516c
1 st election in 2024 1 and 5 with (3 or 4) 1 and 5 with (2 or 3) 1 and 4 with (2 or 3) 1 st election in 2026 2 with (3 or 4) 4 with (2 or 3) 5 with (2 or 3)

City Council Staff Report - Page 3 of 3

The City also received three (3) additional maps from the public on or before the September 7, 2023, deadline to submit new or revised public maps. These maps are Map 511b, Map 521 (not population-balanced, not contiguous), and Map 522. All maps received or revised at the direction of the City Council and demographic profiles for each map have been posted on the City website, included in this report as Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Attachment 3 and can be accessed at the following url: https://drawranchocordova.org/draft-maps/ After selecting its preferred map, the City Council must decide which districts are up for election in 2024, with the others thus being up for election in 2026. Under Section 10010(b) of the California Elections Code:

In determining the final sequence of the district elections conducted in a political subdivision in which members of the governing body will be elected at different times to provide for staggered terms of office, the governing body shall give special consideration to the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 14025) of Division 14 of this code), and it shall take into account the preferences expressed by members of the districts.

Given the statutory timing requirements, in order to avoid litigation and significant exposure to attorney’s fees, by the end of the City Council meeting on September 18, the Council needs to have completed this fourth public hearing, and have introduced the attached Ordinance for adoption at the City Council meeting on October 2, 2023.

At this time, staff recommends the City Council select its preferred map, designate their preferred election years for each district, and vote to waive the first reading and introduce the proposed Ordinance, as revised by Council direction, establishing five districts for election of five City Council Members and adding new sections to Chapter 2.42 Elections, of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code to provide for City Council Election Districts.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
Neighborhood Elections Now will receive a partial reimbursement, capped at approximately $37,000 if the City complies with the process to transition from at-large to district-based elections.

The City is working with a professional demographer at an estimated cost of $60,000- $80,000 to assist the City with the process of transitioning from at-large to district-based elections.

The City will also incur additional fees for City Attorney time, community meetings, assistance from consultants for public outreach, and staff time.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Draft Focus Maps and Demographic Profiles

2. Additional Draft Maps and Demographic Profiles Submitted on or Before September 7, 2023

3. Original Draft Maps and Demographic Profiles Submitted on or Before August 18, 2023

4. PowerPoint Presentation

5. Ordinance

From: James Garcia
To: districts
Subject: New 5 District Map submission with a rotating Mayor Date: Monday, September 4, 2023 10:11:26 AM
I wanted to provide justification for the map submitted:
https://davesredistricting.org/join/88f666e6-058f-4588-8e26-94814b52146b

1. The city council wanted to have a map that would provide neighborhoods with a way to stick together and not be broken up. This map keeps neighborhoods together. Cordova Meadows and Cordova Gardens have a slight overflow between them as their blocks are not set to their neighborhood boundaries. Cordova Gardens is kept intact with only a small unavoidable portion of Cordova Meadows being added to District 3. All other neighborhoods are kept together that contain any population.

2. I also wanted to keep communities of interest together and as such, kept the western part of the city together into District 1 as they share a common zip code. They also share a common education need for the Afghani population in that the children travel south over Routier Rd.

3. There was also a lot of talking that Folsom Blvd and the freeway were not borders we needed to follow as many neighborhoods frequently traveled back and forth over the freeway to join others. As such, keeping both White Rock’s together and linking to Cordova Gardens in District 3. District 4 utilizes the middle school as a means for a shared interest for those living in the south of the freeway part to join with those in Walnut Wood.

4. I also wanted to keep the area East of Sunrise Blvd. intact as that was another concern of the council, and I did such in District 2.

5. For District 5, they kept the distinction of being North of Coloma Rd. and along the river’s edge. I also kept Cordova Vineyards and Cordova Lane together as many maps had portions broken up splitting them apart.

6. I would also like to have the election sequences be Districts 1, 3, and 5 in 2024. Districts 2 and 4 be in 2026. The CVRA is designed to have the lower turnout districts run in Presidential election years while the more affluent districts run in Non-Presidential years.

From: Fayzah Mughal
To: City Clerk Mailbox; districts
Subject: General Public Comment for Regular Mtg 09/05/23 re:Item 13 + Districts email submission Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 9:06:30 AM
Attachments: Author-Revised 511(b) Justifications (2).pdf map-image (3).png
RanchoNeighborhoods.png
511(b)SupportPg.1.png
511(b)SupportPg.2.png
Hello,
Please attach all of the following documents to the agenda as my general public comment for tonight's Regular Mtg, including the signatures of support (with emails redacted).

I am also submitting all the attached items to the Districts email:Author-Revised Map 511(b)'s proposed Election Sequencing is explicity stated in my Map Justifications and should be displayed on/with my map ( D1, D3, D5 in 2024, then D2, D4 in 2026). I am also submitting signatures of support, and will re-submit them if the numbers increase by Public Hearing #4. The map URL is located inside of the pdf and the map is 'publised' on Dave's mapping tool.

Thank you,
Fayzah Mughal

By: Fayzah Mughal, Lincoln Village
AUTHOR-REVISED Map 511(b): Map Justifications
Map 511(b) URL:
https://davesredistricting.org/join/6410400f-93fa-4b65-a11e-2cff2a48ec8e After Public Hearing #3 on 08/29 I took note of some of the Council’s feedback that adhering to the City’s map of neighborhood boundaries was more important to them than keeping the Communities of Interest (CoI) on Map #511 together.

Although the LAW PRIORITIZES keeping CoI together before the preservation of boundaries, I’ve attempted to marry the two criteria, respecting existing neighborhood boundaries while still preserving as much diversity as possible to guard against dilution.

The law requires that we base district size on the 2020 Census population data and MUST NOT earmark districts in anticipation of future growth; we must redistrict at the appropriate time after population growth actually takes place. For this reason I opted to adjust the shape of the district to the east of Sunrise to keep my map LAWFUL and contiguous. I grouped the whole of D4 together to meet population balance, which is the #1 PRIORITY of the Fair Maps Act law.

Drawing D4 this way allowed me to meet the #2 PRIORITY of the law, which is to preserve COI, as well as meet maximum compliance with the #3 PRIORITY of the law, which is to respect existing boundaries (i.e.city/neighborhood boundaries).

Author-Revised Map 511(b) has a 96.2% rate of neighborhood boundary preservation as depicted on the city’s neighborhood map handout. Unlabeled on the neighborhood map is the Mobil Country Park, which I have treated as a distinct neighborhood (bringing the total to 27) and kept whole.

PROPOSED ELECTION SEQUENCE: D1, D3, D5 in 2024 (filling empty seats/giving more under-represented CoI a voice), then D2, D4 in 2026.

Author-Revised Map 511(b)’s Neigborhood Preservation rate is 96.2%* *includes several Biz Parks + Mobil Country Club as distinct ‘neighborhoods’, as depicted on city’s neighborhood map District D1 D2 D3 D4 D5
Neighborhoods
Lincoln
Village
Countryside
Brookside
Cordova
Meadows
Mather
Business Park
South White
Rock
Stone Creek
Capital Village
Prospect Park
Cordova
Gardens
Mills Ranch
Sunriver
½ Walnut
Wood
Mobil Country Club
Sunrise Industrial
Aerojet Business Park
Sunrise Industrial South
Rio Del Oro
Somerset Ranch
Sunridge Anatolia
Sunridge Park
Sunridge East
Kavala Ranch
Sunrise/Jackson
White Rock
Cordova
Vineyards
Cordova Lane
½ Walnut
Wood

By: Fayzah Mughal, Lincoln Village
AUTHOR-REVISED Map 511(b): Map Justifications
Residents may sign their support for Map 511(b) by scanning this QR Code:

From: Scott Rafferty
To: districts
Subject: Failed Attempt to maintain Folsom Blvd.

Date: Thursday, September 7, 2023 10:25:49 PM
Attachments: image.png
image.png
Dont cross Folsom Blvd.csv
The Pico decision requires CVRA remedies to improve the minority's ability to elect or to influence elections. Ms. Mughal's map creates a strong minority district with a near majority of Latinos and Blacks.

Most of the city's Afghan refugees live in this district, and many are just becoming citizens. It preserves neighborhoods to an extraordinary degree, and avoids combining disparate neighborhoods. The result is distinct districts that provide greatly improved representation for voters of all races.

Several members suggested that it was desirable to maintain Folsom Blvd as a boundary. This simply doesn't work. It requires underpopulating the districts North of Folsom and East of Sunrise, while overp0pulating the historically underrepresented areas of the city that have socio-economic needs that impair their political influence. Maintaining high concentrations of the protected groups, combined with irregular census blocks, is not consistent with a natural division between the two remedial districts south of Folsom. The attached map demonstrates these incurable defects.

Ms. Mughal's scores high on all the FAIRMAPS Act criteria and is an effective remedy for the groups protected by the CVRA. It is widely supported by the community, for good reason.

Scott Rafferty

GEOID20 District

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 2

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 3

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 1

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 4

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

6.07E+13 5

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1

Map 508b
District 1
Total Pop 15,373
Deviation from ideal -556
% Deviation -3.49%
% Hisp 13.5%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 8%
% Asian-American 34%
Total 9,149
% Hisp 15%
% NH White 44%
% NH Black 10%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 30%
Total 9,145
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 12%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 9%
Total 7,798
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 9%
Total 4,572
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black est. 9%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 13,821
age0-19 31%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 15%
immigrants 26%
naturalized 85%
english 68%
spanish 3%
asian-lang 17%
other lang 12%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 13%
hs-grad 48%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 15%
Child in Household child-under18 47%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 73%
income 0-25k 4%
income 25-50k 3%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 55%
income 200k-plus 25%
single family 99%
multi-family 1%
rented 13%
owned 87%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 16,776
847

5.32%
21%
41%
11%
22%
11,455
13%
49%
15%
19%
8,574
15%
14%
9%
3%
59%
14%
6,761
13%
13%
9%
3%
60%
13%
4,248
12%
12%
7%
3%
63%
13%
17,572
27%
57%
16%
25%
58%
62%
13%
12%
13%
18%
59%
20%
9%
36%
69%
10%
15%
19%
49%
7%
66%
34%
50%
50%
3 16,316
387

2.43%
24%
43%
14%
12%
9,754
19%
45%
21%
13%
8,049
17%
16%
5%
1%
55%
22%
5,969
15%
14%
5%
1%
56%
22%
3,687
14%
13%
5%
2%
56%
21%
14,814
27%
56%
17%
24%
62%
63%
17%
7%
14%
18%
65%
13%
4%
35%
65%
21%
25%
17%
34%
3%
68%
32%
52%
48%
4 15,297
-632
-3.97%
24%
52%
9%
9%
10,782
15%
67%
9%
8%
8,419
14%
13%
3%
1%
74%
8%
6,655
13%
12%
2%
2%
75%
8%
4,782
10%
10%
2%
1%
78%
7%
15,761
24%
55%
20%
23%
52%
71%
11%
5%
13%
14%
68%
15%
6%
32%
64%
17%
17%
19%
43%
4%
74%
26%
47%
53%
5 15,881
-48
-0.30%
25%
49%
10%
10%
10,365
18%
63%
7%
9%
8,625
14%
13%
3%
1%
77%
5%
6,768
13%
12%
3%
1%
78%
5%
4,783
10%
10%
2%
2%
80%
4%
16,534
29%
53%
18%
22%
47%
63%
16%
4%
17%
17%
63%
18%
7%
37%
63%
13%
20%
21%
43%
3%
69%
31%
48%
52%
Total
79,643
1,479

9.28%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/30/2023 11:12 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1

Map 508c
District 1
Total Pop 15,373
Deviation from ideal -556
% Deviation -3.49%
% Hisp 13.5%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 8%
% Asian-American 34%
Total 9,149
% Hisp 15%
% NH White 44%
% NH Black 10%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 30%
Total 9,145
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 12%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 9%
Total 7,798
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 9%
Total 4,572
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black est. 9%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 13,821
age0-19 31%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 15%
immigrants 26%
naturalized 85%
english 68%
spanish 3%
asian-lang 17%
other lang 12%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 13%
hs-grad 48%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 15%
Child in Household child-under18 47%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 73%
income 0-25k 4%
income 25-50k 3%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 55%
income 200k-plus 25%
single family 99%
multi-family 1%
rented 13%
owned 87%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 16,859
930

5.84%
21%
41%
11%
22%
11,455
13%
49%
15%
19%
8,593
15%
14%
9%
3%
59%
14%
6,774
14%
13%
9%
3%
60%
13%
4,250
12%
12%
7%
3%
63%
13%
17,572
27%
57%
16%
25%
58%
62%
13%
12%
13%
18%
59%
20%
9%
36%
69%
10%
15%
19%
49%
7%
66%
34%
50%
50%
3 16,316
387

2.43%
24%
43%
14%
12%
9,754
19%
45%
21%
13%
8,049
17%
16%
5%
1%
55%
22%
5,969
15%
14%
5%
1%
56%
22%
3,687
14%
13%
5%
2%
56%
21%
14,814
27%
56%
17%
24%
62%
63%
17%
7%
14%
18%
65%
13%
4%
35%
65%
21%
25%
17%
34%
3%
68%
32%
52%
48%
4 15,488
-441
-2.77%
24%
52%
9%
9%
10,920
15%
66%
8%
8%
8,523
14%
13%
3%
1%
74%
8%
6,738
13%
12%
2%
2%
75%
7%
4,837
10%
10%
2%
1%
78%
7%
15,982
24%
55%
21%
23%
52%
71%
11%
5%
13%
14%
69%
15%
6%
32%
64%
17%
17%
19%
43%
4%
73%
27%
47%
53%
5 15,607
-322
-2.02%
25%
49%
11%
10%
10,227
18%
63%
7%
9%
8,502
14%
13%
3%
1%
77%
5%
6,672
12%
12%
3%
1%
78%
5%
4,726
10%
10%
2%
2%
80%
4%
16,313
29%
53%
18%
22%
47%
63%
16%
4%
17%
16%
63%
18%
7%
37%
63%
13%
20%
21%
43%
3%
70%
30%
48%
52%
Total
79,643
1,486

9.33%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/30/2023 11:14 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1

2 1
3 4
5 Chrysanthy Blvd
Douglas Rd
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Benita Dr
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 19, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 1 (Sander), 5 (Gatewood, Pulipati &Terry) and one of 2 (vacant) or 3 (vacant)2026: District 4 (Budge) and the other oneof 2 (vacant) or 3 (vacant) Map layers
Map 511
Census Block
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
1

Map 511
District 1
Total Pop 16,386
Deviation from ideal 457
% Deviation 2.87%
% Hisp 24.0%
% NH White 43%
% NH Black 14%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 10,370
% Hisp 18%
% NH White 47%
% NH Black 20%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 13%
Total 8,222
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 58%
% NH Black 19%
Total 6,163
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black 19%
Total 3,938
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 60%
% NH Black est. 18%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 16,196
age0-19 28%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 17%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 56%
english 62%
spanish 17%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 14%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 62%
bachelor 14%
graduatedegree 5%
Child in Household child-under18 35%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 20%
income 25-50k 23%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 35%
income 200k-plus 4%
single family 69%
multi-family 31%
rented 50%
owned 50%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 16,139
210

1.32%
23%
52%
10%
9%
10,359
16%
65%
7%
10%
8,891
13%
12%
3%
1%
76%
6%
7,034
12%
11%
3%
1%
78%
6%
5,032
10%
10%
2%
1%
79%
5%
16,146
28%
53%
19%
26%
50%
63%
12%
8%
17%
19%
66%
14%
6%
36%
65%
16%
17%
22%
43%
3%
75%
25%
43%
57%
3 15,670
-259
-1.63%
27%
48%
9%
9%
11,093
18%
64%
9%
7%
8,223
15%
14%
2%
2%
73%
8%
6,345
14%
13%
2%
2%
73%
8%
4,483
11%
11%
2%
2%
76%
7%
16,461
26%
55%
20%
21%
53%
69%
15%
3%
12%
13%
66%
16%
6%
35%
62%
16%
19%
20%
43%
2%
72%
28%
49%
51%
4 16,055
126

0.79%
19%
40%
12%
23%
10,534
13%
48%
16%
19%
8,324
14%
13%
9%
3%
58%
15%
6,607
13%
12%
9%
3%
59%
15%
4,047
12%
11%
7%
3%
62%
14%
15,877
26%
59%
15%
25%
61%
64%
12%
10%
13%
17%
61%
22%
9%
33%
72%
10%
18%
17%
48%
7%
62%
38%
55%
45%
5 15,393
-536
-3.36%
14%
39%
8%
34%
9,149
15%
44%
10%
30%
9,152
14%
13%
12%
4%
61%
9%
7,802
14%
13%
11%
3%
62%
9%
4,572
13%
12%
9%
3%
63%
9%
13,821
31%
54%
15%
26%
85%
68%
3%
17%
12%
13%
48%
32%
15%
47%
73%
4%
3%
13%
55%
25%
99%
1%
13%
87%
Total
79,643
993

6.23%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/19/2023 22:58 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1

Map 516b
District 1
Total Pop 15,454
Deviation from ideal -475
% Deviation -2.98%
% Hisp 21.1%
% NH White 52%
% NH Black 11%
% Asian-American 10%
Total 10,054
% Hisp 16%
% NH White 65%
% NH Black 7%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 10%
Total 8,804
% Latino est. 12%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black 5%
Total 7,067
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 80%
% NH Black 5%
Total 5,082
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 81%
% NH Black est. 4%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 15,834
age0-19 28%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 19%
immigrants 24%
naturalized 46%
english 64%
spanish 12%
asian-lang 6%
other lang 18%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 18%
hs-grad 66%
bachelor 17%
graduatedegree 7%
Child in Household child-under18 34%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 14%
income 25-50k 18%
income 50-75k 20%
income 75-200k 42%
income 200k-plus 5%
single family 70%
multi-family 30%
rented 46%
owned 54%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 15,724
-205
-1.29%
27%
48%
9%
9%
11,093
18%
64%
9%
7%
8,240
15%
14%
2%
2%
72%
8%
6,356
14%
13%
2%
2%
73%
8%
4,483
11%
11%
2%
2%
76%
7%
16,461
26%
55%
20%
21%
53%
69%
15%
3%
12%
13%
66%
16%
6%
35%
62%
16%
19%
20%
43%
2%
72%
28%
49%
51%
3 16,316
387

2.43%
24%
43%
14%
12%
9,754
19%
45%
21%
13%
8,049
17%
16%
5%
1%
55%
22%
5,969
15%
14%
5%
1%
56%
22%
3,687
14%
13%
5%
2%
56%
21%
14,814
27%
56%
17%
24%
62%
63%
17%
7%
14%
18%
65%
13%
4%
35%
65%
21%
25%
17%
34%
3%
68%
32%
52%
48%
4 15,373
-556
-3.49%
14%
39%
8%
34%
9,149
15%
44%
10%
30%
9,145
14%
13%
12%
4%
61%
9%
7,798
14%
13%
11%
3%
62%
9%
4,572
13%
12%
9%
3%
63%
9%
13,821
31%
54%
15%
26%
85%
68%
3%
17%
12%
13%
48%
32%
15%
47%
73%
4%
3%
13%
55%
25%
99%
1%
13%
87%
5 16,776
847

5.32%
21%
41%
11%
22%
11,455
13%
49%
15%
19%
8,574
15%
14%
9%
3%
59%
14%
6,761
13%
13%
9%
3%
60%
13%
4,248
12%
12%
7%
3%
63%
13%
17,572
27%
57%
16%
25%
58%
62%
13%
12%
13%
18%
59%
20%
9%
36%
69%
10%
15%
19%
49%
7%
66%
34%
50%
50%
Total
79,643
1,403

8.81%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/30/2023 11:15 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1

Map 516c
District 1
Total Pop 15,454
Deviation from ideal -475
% Deviation -2.98%
% Hisp 21.1%
% NH White 52%
% NH Black 11%
% Asian-American 10%
Total 10,054
% Hisp 16%
% NH White 65%
% NH Black 7%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 10%
Total 8,804
% Latino est. 12%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black 5%
Total 7,067
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 80%
% NH Black 5%
Total 5,082
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 81%
% NH Black est. 4%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 15,834
age0-19 28%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 19%
immigrants 24%
naturalized 46%
english 64%
spanish 12%
asian-lang 6%
other lang 18%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 18%
hs-grad 66%
bachelor 17%
graduatedegree 7%
Child in Household child-under18 34%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 14%
income 25-50k 18%
income 50-75k 20%
income 75-200k 42%
income 200k-plus 5%
single family 70%
multi-family 30%
rented 46%
owned 54%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 15,641
-288
-1.81%
27%
49%
9%
9%
11,093
18%
64%
9%
7%
8,221
15%
14%
2%
2%
73%
8%
6,343
14%
13%
2%
2%
73%
8%
4,481
11%
11%
2%
2%
76%
7%
16,461
26%
55%
20%
21%
53%
69%
15%
3%
12%
13%
66%
16%
6%
35%
62%
16%
19%
20%
43%
2%
72%
28%
49%
51%
3 16,316
387

2.43%
24%
43%
14%
12%
9,754
19%
45%
21%
13%
8,049
17%
16%
5%
1%
55%
22%
5,969
15%
14%
5%
1%
56%
22%
3,687
14%
13%
5%
2%
56%
21%
14,814
27%
56%
17%
24%
62%
63%
17%
7%
14%
18%
65%
13%
4%
35%
65%
21%
25%
17%
34%
3%
68%
32%
52%
48%
4 15,373
-556
-3.49%
14%
39%
8%
34%
9,149
15%
44%
10%
30%
9,145
14%
13%
12%
4%
61%
9%
7,798
14%
13%
11%
3%
62%
9%
4,572
13%
12%
9%
3%
63%
9%
13,821
31%
54%
15%
26%
85%
68%
3%
17%
12%
13%
48%
32%
15%
47%
73%
4%
3%
13%
55%
25%
99%
1%
13%
87%
5 16,859
930

5.84%
21%
41%
11%
22%
11,455
13%
49%
15%
19%
8,593
15%
14%
9%
3%
59%
14%
6,774
14%
13%
9%
3%
60%
13%
4,250
12%
12%
7%
3%
63%
13%
17,572
27%
57%
16%
25%
58%
62%
13%
12%
13%
18%
59%
20%
9%
36%
69%
10%
15%
19%
49%
7%
66%
34%
50%
50%
Total
79,643
1,486

9.33%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/30/2023 11:15 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1

5 1
3 2
4 American River Bike Trl
Chrysanthy Blvd
Kiefer Blvd
Douglas Rd
Jaeg
e
r
R
d
Sunrise Blvd
Folsom Blvd Mather Field Rd
Mc Gregor Dr
Mills Park Dr
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
P
ro
s
pe
ct
P
a
r
k
D
r
Chase Dr
Routier Rd
Old Placerville Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Zinfandel Dr
Benita Dr
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, September 11, 2023
Submitter's Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 1 (Sander), 3 (vacant) and 5 (vacant)2026: Districts 2 (Budge) and 4 (Gatewood, Pulipati & Terry) Map layers
Map 511b
Census Block
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
2

Map 511b
District 1
Total Pop 16,727
Deviation from ideal 798
% Deviation 5.01%
% Hisp 24.7%
% NH White 43%
% NH Black 13%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 10,571
% Hisp 18%
% NH White 48%
% NH Black 18%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 13%
Total 8,663
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black 18%
Total 6,532
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 60%
% NH Black 18%
Total 4,251
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black est. 17%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 16,716
age0-19 29%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 17%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 53%
english 62%
spanish 17%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 15%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 61%
bachelor 15%
graduatedegree 6%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 18%
income 25-50k 24%
income 50-75k 18%
income 75-200k 36%
income 200k-plus 4%
single family 73%
multi-family 27%
rented 48%
owned 52%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 15,388
-541
-3.40%
18%
40%
12%
23%
9,843
12%
47%
18%
20%
7,671
14%
13%
10%
3%
57%
16%
6,094
12%
12%
9%
3%
59%
15%
3,689
11%
11%
8%
3%
61%
15%
14,637
25%
60%
15%
25%
62%
66%
10%
10%
14%
16%
62%
22%
9%
33%
72%
12%
17%
16%
47%
7%
57%
43%
59%
41%
3 15,579
-350
-2.20%
21%
55%
10%
9%
10,804
14%
69%
6%
8%
8,772
13%
12%
2%
1%
78%
6%
7,048
12%
11%
2%
1%
79%
5%
5,023
10%
9%
2%
1%
81%
5%
16,463
26%
56%
18%
25%
53%
64%
10%
5%
21%
18%
68%
16%
6%
35%
64%
15%
18%
21%
43%
3%
70%
30%
48%
52%
4 16,385
456

2.86%
14%
40%
8%
32%
9,656
15%
46%
10%
28%
9,772
14%
13%
11%
3%
62%
9%
8,311
13%
13%
11%
3%
63%
9%
4,965
12%
12%
9%
3%
65%
9%
14,400
30%
53%
17%
26%
83%
68%
4%
17%
11%
13%
49%
31%
14%
43%
71%
6%
6%
13%
52%
23%
99%
1%
13%
87%
5 15,564
-365
-2.29%
30%
45%
9%
10%
10,631
20%
58%
10%
10%
7,934
17%
16%
3%
2%
69%
9%
5,966
15%
14%
3%
2%
71%
9%
4,144
12%
12%
3%
2%
73%
9%
16,286
28%
53%
19%
21%
50%
66%
19%
7%
8%
15%
63%
15%
6%
37%
64%
15%
16%
21%
46%
2%
76%
24%
45%
55%
Total
79,643
1,339

8.41%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
09/11/2023 13:26 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 2

2 3
1 5
4 American River Bike Trl
Chrysanthy Blvd
Kiefer Blvd
Douglas Rd
Jaeg
e
r
R
d
Sunrise Blvd
Folsom Blvd Mather Field Rd
Mc Gregor Dr
Mills Park Dr
Ambassador Dr
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
Chase Dr
Routier Rd
Old Placerville Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Zinfandel Dr
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, September 11, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:not applicable
Not Population Balanced.Not Contiguous.

Map layers
Map 521
Census Block
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
2

Map 521
District 1
Total Pop 20,506
Deviation from ideal 4,577
% Deviation 28.73%
% Hisp 24.5%
% NH White 44%
% NH Black 13%
% Asian-American 11%
Total 12,936
% Hisp 18%
% NH White 52%
% NH Black 16%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 12%
Total 10,773
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black 15%
Total 8,187
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 65%
% NH Black 15%
Total 5,434
% Latino est. 12%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 67%
% NH Black est. 14%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 20,226
age0-19 29%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 17%
immigrants 21%
naturalized 52%
english 64%
spanish 16%
asian-lang 6%
other lang 13%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 17%
hs-grad 61%
bachelor 16%
graduatedegree 6%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64%
income 0-25k 17%
income 25-50k 22%
income 50-75k 18%
income 75-200k 38%
income 200k-plus 4%
single family 74%
multi-family 26%
rented 46%
owned 54%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 16,311
382

2.40%
29%
38%
13%
13%
10,533
18%
48%
18%
13%
7,526
18%
16%
4%
1%
59%
18%
5,463
15%
14%
4%
2%
61%
18%
3,394
14%
13%
3%
2%
63%
17%
16,805
29%
56%
16%
22%
55%
63%
19%
7%
11%
18%
61%
17%
6%
36%
68%
15%
21%
22%
40%
2%
48%
52%
67%
33%
3 7,903
-8,026
-50.39%
18%
42%
9%
26%
5,375
10%
53%
13%
21%
3,974
13%
12%
11%
4%
62%
9%
3,278
12%
12%
11%
4%
62%
9%
2,034
11%
11%
8%
4%
65%
9%
7,779
23%
59%
17%
24%
61%
70%
8%
12%
10%
13%
63%
20%
9%
34%
69%
11%
10%
14%
52%
12%
83%
17%
36%
64%
4 17,250
1,321

8.29%
13%
41%
8%
33%
10,089
15%
44%
10%
29%
10,261
14%
13%
12%
3%
61%
9%
8,755
13%
13%
12%
3%
62%
9%
5,197
12%
12%
10%
3%
64%
9%
15,327
31%
54%
15%
27%
83%
66%
4%
17%
13%
13%
48%
32%
15%
46%
72%
4%
4%
12%
56%
23%
99%
1%
15%
85%
5 17,673
1,744

10.95%
21%
56%
8%
9%
12,573
15%
69%
7%
7%
10,278
13%
12%
3%
1%
76%
6%
8,268
12%
11%
2%
2%
77%
6%
6,013
10%
9%
2%
1%
79%
6%
18,365
24%
55%
21%
26%
53%
66%
11%
4%
19%
17%
70%
15%
6%
32%
63%
16%
18%
19%
43%
3%
75%
25%
44%
56%
Total
79,643
12,603

79.12%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
09/11/2023 14:47 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 2

3 5
1 4
2 American River Bike Trl
El Dorado Fwy
Chrysanthy Blvd
Kiefer Blvd
Douglas Rd
Jaeg
e
r
R
d
Sunrise Blvd
Folsom Blvd Mather Field Rd
Mc Gregor Dr
Mills Park Dr
Ambassador Dr
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
P
ro
s
pe
ct
P
a
r
k
D
r
Chase Dr
Old Placerville Rd
Zinfandel Dr
Benita Dr
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, September 11, 2023
Submitter's Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 1 (Sander), 3 (vacant) and 5 (vacant)2026: Districts 2 (Gatewood, Pulipati & Terry) and 4 (Budge) Map layers
Map 522
Census Block
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
2

Map 522
District 1
Total Pop 16,728
Deviation from ideal 799
% Deviation 5.02%
% Hisp 24.7%
% NH White 43%
% NH Black 13%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 10,571
% Hisp 18%
% NH White 48%
% NH Black 18%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 13%
Total 8,667
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black 18%
Total 6,533
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 60%
% NH Black 18%
Total 4,251
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black est. 17%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 16,717
age0-19 29%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 17%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 53%
english 62%
spanish 17%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 15%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 61%
bachelor 15%
graduatedegree 6%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 18%
income 25-50k 24%
income 50-75k 18%
income 75-200k 36%
income 200k-plus 4%
single family 73%
multi-family 27%
rented 48%
owned 52%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 15,631
-298
-1.87%
14%
39%
8%
33%
9,185
15%
44%
10%
30%
9,179
14%
13%
12%
4%
61%
9%
7,823
14%
13%
11%
3%
62%
9%
4,577
13%
12%
9%
3%
63%
9%
13,870
31%
54%
15%
26%
85%
68%
3%
17%
12%
13%
48%
32%
15%
47%
73%
4%
3%
13%
55%
25%
99%
1%
13%
87%
3 16,238
309

1.94%
27%
40%
14%
13%
10,478
17%
50%
17%
13%
7,751
17%
15%
4%
1%
62%
16%
5,736
14%
13%
4%
1%
64%
16%
3,636
12%
12%
3%
1%
67%
15%
16,421
29%
56%
15%
21%
52%
65%
17%
8%
10%
18%
61%
17%
6%
35%
69%
16%
20%
22%
41%
1%
52%
48%
63%
37%
4 15,338
-591
-3.71%
18%
47%
10%
19%
10,268
12%
59%
10%
16%
8,275
13%
12%
8%
3%
66%
9%
6,675
12%
12%
8%
3%
67%
9%
4,457
10%
10%
6%
2%
70%
8%
15,008
25%
56%
19%
26%
60%
66%
10%
8%
15%
14%
63%
19%
9%
34%
64%
14%
17%
16%
46%
8%
79%
21%
40%
60%
5 15,708
-221
-1.39%
24%
54%
7%
9%
11,003
17%
66%
7%
7%
8,940
13%
12%
3%
1%
77%
5%
7,184
12%
12%
2%
2%
78%
5%
5,151
10%
10%
2%
2%
80%
5%
16,485
25%
55%
20%
23%
53%
66%
12%
5%
17%
16%
69%
16%
6%
34%
65%
12%
16%
20%
48%
4%
75%
25%
45%
55%
Total
79,643
1,390

8.73%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
09/11/2023 15:16 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 2

2 1
3 4
5 Chrysanthy Blvd
Douglas Rd
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Benita Dr
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 19, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 1 (Sander), 5 (Gatewood, Pulipati &Terry) and one of 2 (vacant) or 3 (vacant)2026: District 4 (Budge) and the other oneof 2 (vacant) or 3 (vacant) Map layers
Map 501
Census BlockBlank 7 Dist
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
Not Population Balanced
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
3

Map 501
District 1
Total Pop 16,385
Deviation from ideal 456
% Deviation 2.86%
% Hisp 24.0%
% NH White 43%
% NH Black 14%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 10,369
% Hisp 18%
% NH White 47%
% NH Black 20%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 13%
Total 8,221
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 58%
% NH Black 19%
Total 6,162
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black 19%
Total 3,937
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 60%
% NH Black est. 18%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 16,196
age0-19 28%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 17%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 56%
english 62%
spanish 17%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 14%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 62%
bachelor 14%
graduatedegree 5%
Child in Household child-under18 35%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 20%
income 25-50k 23%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 35%
income 200k-plus 4%
single family 69%
multi-family 31%
rented 50%
owned 50%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 16,139
210

1.32%
23%
52%
10%
9%
10,359
16%
65%
7%
10%
8,891
13%
12%
3%
1%
76%
6%
7,034
12%
11%
3%
1%
78%
6%
5,032
10%
10%
2%
1%
79%
5%
16,146
28%
53%
19%
26%
50%
63%
12%
8%
17%
19%
66%
14%
6%
36%
65%
16%
17%
22%
43%
3%
75%
25%
43%
57%
3 17,136
1,207

7.58%
27%
48%
9%
9%
12,196
18%
64%
9%
8%
9,024
16%
15%
3%
2%
72%
8%
6,946
14%
13%
2%
2%
73%
8%
4,872
11%
11%
2%
2%
76%
8%
18,255
26%
55%
19%
21%
53%
69%
16%
4%
11%
14%
65%
16%
6%
35%
62%
15%
19%
19%
44%
2%
74%
26%
47%
53%
4 14,624
-1,305
-8.19%
18%
40%
12%
24%
9,433
12%
47%
17%
20%
7,539
14%
13%
10%
3%
57%
16%
6,015
13%
12%
10%
3%
58%
15%
3,661
12%
11%
8%
3%
61%
15%
14,085
25%
59%
15%
25%
62%
65%
10%
10%
14%
17%
61%
22%
9%
33%
72%
10%
18%
17%
48%
8%
58%
42%
58%
42%
5 15,359
-570
-3.58%
14%
39%
8%
34%
9,149
15%
44%
10%
30%
9,137
14%
13%
12%
4%
61%
9%
7,794
14%
13%
11%
3%
62%
9%
4,570
13%
12%
9%
3%
63%
9%
13,821
31%
54%
15%
26%
85%
68%
3%
17%
12%
13%
48%
32%
15%
47%
73%
4%
3%
13%
55%
25%
99%
1%
13%
87%
Total
79,643
2,512

15.77%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/19/2023 23:15 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

3 4
5 2
1 Chrysanthy Blvd
Douglas Rd
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 19, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 5 (Sander), 1 (Gatewood, Pulipati &Terry) and one of 3 (vacant) or 4 (vacant)2026: District 2 (Budge) and the other oneof 3 (vacant) or 4 (vacant) Map layers
Map 502
Census BlockBlank 7 Dist
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
3

Map 502
District 1
Total Pop 15,631
Deviation from ideal -298
% Deviation -1.87%
% Hisp 13.7%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 8%
% Asian-American 33%
Total 9,185
% Hisp 15%
% NH White 44%
% NH Black 10%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 30%
Total 9,179
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 12%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 9%
Total 7,823
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 9%
Total 4,577
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black est. 9%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 13,870
age0-19 31%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 15%
immigrants 26%
naturalized 85%
english 68%
spanish 3%
asian-lang 17%
other lang 12%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 13%
hs-grad 48%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 15%
Child in Household child-under18 47%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 73%
income 0-25k 4%
income 25-50k 3%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 55%
income 200k-plus 25%
single family 99%
multi-family 1%
rented 13%
owned 87%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 16,707
778

4.88%
19%
40%
12%
22%
10,832
13%
47%
17%
19%
8,440
14%
13%
9%
3%
58%
15%
6,671
13%
12%
9%
3%
59%
15%
4,074
12%
11%
7%
3%
62%
14%
16,293
26%
59%
15%
25%
61%
65%
12%
10%
13%
16%
61%
21%
8%
34%
71%
12%
17%
16%
48%
7%
60%
40%
56%
44%
3 16,385
456

2.86%
26%
44%
12%
12%
10,377
18%
48%
19%
14%
8,183
18%
16%
5%
1%
56%
20%
6,059
16%
15%
5%
1%
57%
20%
3,861
14%
14%
5%
2%
57%
20%
16,093
28%
54%
18%
24%
58%
60%
18%
9%
13%
20%
62%
12%
5%
37%
63%
20%
22%
20%
36%
2%
76%
24%
45%
55%
4 15,578
-351
-2.20%
24%
52%
9%
9%
11,054
15%
67%
8%
8%
8,723
14%
13%
3%
2%
74%
7%
6,901
13%
12%
2%
2%
75%
7%
4,957
10%
10%
2%
1%
78%
7%
16,147
24%
55%
21%
23%
52%
70%
11%
5%
13%
15%
69%
15%
6%
32%
64%
17%
17%
19%
43%
4%
73%
27%
48%
52%
5 15,342
-587
-3.69%
25%
48%
11%
10%
10,057
18%
62%
7%
9%
8,287
14%
13%
3%
1%
77%
5%
6,497
13%
12%
3%
1%
78%
5%
4,603
10%
10%
2%
1%
80%
4%
16,099
29%
53%
18%
21%
47%
63%
16%
4%
17%
16%
63%
18%
7%
37%
63%
13%
21%
20%
43%
3%
70%
30%
48%
52%
Total
79,643
1,365

8.57%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/19/2023 23:13 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

3 5
4 1
2 Chrysanthy Blvd
Douglas Rd
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 19, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 5 (Sander), 1 (Gatewood, Pulipati &Terry) and one of 3 (vacant) or 4 (vacant)2026: District 2 (Budge) and the other oneof 3 (vacant) or 4 (vacant) Map layers
Map 503
Census BlockBlank 7 Dist
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
3

Map 503
District 1
Total Pop 15,359
Deviation from ideal -570
% Deviation -3.58%
% Hisp 13.5%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 8%
% Asian-American 34%
Total 9,149
% Hisp 15%
% NH White 44%
% NH Black 10%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 30%
Total 9,137
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 12%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 9%
Total 7,794
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 9%
Total 4,570
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black est. 9%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 13,821
age0-19 31%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 15%
immigrants 26%
naturalized 85%
english 68%
spanish 3%
asian-lang 17%
other lang 12%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 13%
hs-grad 48%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 15%
Child in Household child-under18 47%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 73%
income 0-25k 4%
income 25-50k 3%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 55%
income 200k-plus 25%
single family 99%
multi-family 1%
rented 13%
owned 87%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 16,804
875

5.49%
19%
40%
12%
22%
10,832
13%
47%
17%
19%
8,467
14%
13%
9%
3%
58%
15%
6,688
13%
12%
9%
3%
59%
15%
4,078
12%
11%
7%
3%
62%
14%
16,293
26%
59%
15%
25%
61%
65%
12%
10%
13%
16%
61%
21%
8%
34%
71%
12%
17%
16%
48%
7%
60%
40%
56%
44%
3 16,385
456

2.86%
26%
44%
12%
12%
10,377
18%
48%
19%
14%
8,183
18%
16%
5%
1%
56%
20%
6,059
16%
15%
5%
1%
57%
20%
3,861
14%
14%
5%
2%
57%
20%
16,093
28%
54%
18%
24%
58%
60%
18%
9%
13%
20%
62%
12%
5%
37%
63%
20%
22%
20%
36%
2%
76%
24%
45%
55%
4 15,868
-61
-0.38%
21%
56%
9%
9%
11,025
14%
70%
6%
8%
9,106
13%
12%
3%
1%
77%
6%
7,294
12%
11%
2%
1%
78%
6%
5,254
10%
9%
2%
1%
80%
6%
16,417
24%
55%
21%
27%
53%
65%
10%
4%
20%
18%
70%
15%
6%
32%
63%
16%
19%
20%
42%
4%
73%
27%
45%
55%
5 15,227
-702
-4.41%
28%
44%
11%
11%
10,122
19%
59%
9%
9%
7,919
15%
14%
3%
1%
74%
7%
6,116
14%
13%
3%
1%
75%
6%
4,309
11%
10%
2%
2%
78%
6%
15,878
29%
53%
17%
18%
43%
68%
17%
5%
9%
13%
62%
18%
7%
37%
64%
14%
19%
20%
44%
3%
69%
31%
51%
49%
Total
79,643
1,577

9.90%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/19/2023 23:11 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

3 1
4 5
2 Chrysanthy Blvd
Douglas Rd
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 19, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 1 (Sander), 5 (Gatewood, Pulipati &Terry) and one of 3 (vacant) or 4 (vacant)2026: District 2 (Budge) and the other oneof 3 (vacant) or 4 (vacant) Map layers
Map 504
Census BlockBlank 7 Dist
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
Not Population Balanced
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
3

Map 504
District 1
Total Pop 17,546
Deviation from ideal 1,617
% Deviation 10.15%
% Hisp 29.5%
% NH White 41%
% NH Black 13%
% Asian-American 10%
Total 10,668
% Hisp 21%
% NH White 52%
% NH Black 13%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 11%
Total 8,486
% Latino est. 17%
% Spanish-Surnamed 16%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 68%
% NH Black 11%
Total 6,286
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 71%
% NH Black 10%
Total 4,246
% Latino est. 12%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 74%
% NH Black est. 9%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 17,506
age0-19 31%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 17%
immigrants 22%
naturalized 47%
english 64%
spanish 21%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 8%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 16%
hs-grad 58%
bachelor 15%
graduatedegree 7%
Child in Household child-under18 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 17%
income 25-50k 21%
income 50-75k 21%
income 75-200k 38%
income 200k-plus 3%
single family 66%
multi-family 34%
rented 49%
owned 51%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 15,752
-177
-1.11%
19%
45%
8%
22%
10,224
12%
56%
10%
18%
8,586
13%
13%
9%
3%
64%
10%
7,010
13%
12%
8%
3%
65%
10%
4,587
10%
10%
6%
3%
68%
10%
14,910
24%
57%
19%
24%
57%
67%
9%
10%
14%
16%
61%
22%
10%
30%
68%
11%
15%
15%
50%
8%
78%
22%
43%
57%
3 15,293
-636
-3.99%
24%
43%
15%
12%
9,676
18%
44%
24%
13%
7,560
17%
15%
6%
1%
54%
22%
5,604
15%
14%
5%
1%
55%
23%
3,468
14%
14%
5%
2%
55%
22%
14,997
29%
57%
15%
22%
61%
63%
17%
6%
13%
19%
66%
13%
3%
37%
67%
20%
24%
19%
35%
3%
60%
40%
60%
40%
4 15,693
-236
-1.48%
21%
56%
8%
9%
11,788
14%
69%
6%
8%
9,043
13%
12%
3%
1%
77%
6%
7,257
12%
11%
2%
1%
78%
6%
5,201
10%
10%
2%
1%
79%
6%
17,268
24%
55%
21%
26%
55%
65%
9%
4%
21%
17%
69%
16%
6%
35%
62%
13%
17%
19%
46%
4%
73%
27%
46%
54%
5 15,359
-570
-3.58%
14%
39%
8%
34%
9,149
15%
44%
10%
30%
9,137
14%
13%
12%
4%
61%
9%
7,794
14%
13%
11%
3%
62%
9%
4,570
13%
12%
9%
3%
63%
9%
13,821
31%
54%
15%
26%
85%
68%
3%
17%
12%
13%
48%
32%
15%
47%
73%
4%
3%
13%
55%
25%
99%
1%
13%
87%
Total
79,643
2,253

14.14%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/19/2023 23:10 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

4 3
5 1
2 Chrysanthy Blvd
Douglas Rd
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 19, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 3 (Sander), 2 (Gatewood, Pulipati &Terry) and one of 4 (vacant) or 5 (vacant)2026: District 1 (Budge) and the other oneof 4 (vacant) or 5 (vacant) Map layers
Map 505
Census Block
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
3

Map 505
District 1
Total Pop 15,913
Deviation from ideal -16
% Deviation -0.10%
% Hisp 19.4%
% NH White 42%
% NH Black 10%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 11,031
% Hisp 12%
% NH White 51%
% NH Black 16%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 17%
Total 8,236
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 13%
Total 6,634
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 13%
Total 4,172
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 7%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 64%
% NH Black est. 12%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 16,666
age0-19 26%
age20-60 59%
age60plus 15%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 58%
english 67%
spanish 10%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 13%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 16%
hs-grad 61%
bachelor 22%
graduatedegree 8%
Child in Household child-under18 34%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 70%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 14%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 50%
income 200k-plus 7%
single family 64%
multi-family 36%
rented 54%
owned 46%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 15,631
-298
-1.87%
14%
39%
8%
33%
9,185
15%
44%
10%
30%
9,179
14%
13%
12%
4%
61%
9%
7,823
14%
13%
11%
3%
62%
9%
4,577
13%
12%
9%
3%
63%
9%
13,870
31%
54%
15%
26%
85%
68%
3%
17%
12%
13%
48%
32%
15%
47%
73%
4%
3%
13%
55%
25%
99%
1%
13%
87%
3 15,700
-229
-1.44%
24%
43%
13%
13%
10,072
19%
47%
19%
13%
8,096
17%
15%
5%
1%
58%
19%
6,092
15%
14%
5%
1%
59%
19%
3,911
13%
13%
5%
2%
60%
18%
15,781
28%
55%
17%
23%
55%
61%
17%
7%
15%
19%
62%
14%
5%
35%
63%
18%
24%
18%
36%
4%
71%
29%
48%
52%
4 16,706
777

4.88%
29%
43%
12%
10%
10,228
20%
55%
11%
12%
8,210
16%
15%
3%
1%
69%
10%
6,120
14%
13%
3%
1%
71%
10%
4,161
12%
12%
2%
2%
73%
9%
15,817
29%
53%
18%
21%
52%
65%
20%
7%
8%
14%
62%
14%
6%
38%
65%
16%
20%
22%
41%
1%
68%
32%
50%
50%
5 15,693
-236
-1.48%
21%
56%
9%
9%
10,989
14%
70%
7%
8%
9,091
13%
12%
3%
1%
77%
6%
7,282
12%
11%
2%
1%
78%
6%
5,251
10%
9%
2%
1%
80%
6%
16,368
24%
55%
21%
27%
53%
65%
10%
4%
20%
18%
70%
15%
6%
32%
63%
16%
19%
20%
42%
4%
73%
27%
45%
55%
Total
79,643
1,075

6.75%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/19/2023 23:08 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

3 1
2 4
5 Chrysanthy Blvd
Douglas Rd
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 19, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 1 (Sander), 5 (Gatewood, Pulipati &Terry) and one of 2 (vacant) or 3 (vacant)2026: District 4 (Budge) and the other oneof 2 (vacant) or 3 (vacant) Map layers
Map 506
Census Block
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
3

Map 506
District 1
Total Pop 15,878
Deviation from ideal -51
% Deviation -0.32%
% Hisp 24.9%
% NH White 43%
% NH Black 13%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 9,976
% Hisp 18%
% NH White 49%
% NH Black 18%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 13%
Total 8,263
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black 18%
Total 6,201
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 60%
% NH Black 18%
Total 4,064
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black est. 17%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 15,896
age0-19 29%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 17%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 53%
english 62%
spanish 16%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 15%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 61%
bachelor 15%
graduatedegree 6%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 18%
income 25-50k 24%
income 50-75k 18%
income 75-200k 36%
income 200k-plus 4%
single family 72%
multi-family 28%
rented 48%
owned 52%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 15,912
-17
-0.11%
21%
56%
9%
9%
11,169
14%
70%
6%
8%
9,207
13%
12%
3%
1%
77%
6%
7,379
12%
11%
2%
1%
78%
6%
5,335
10%
9%
2%
1%
80%
6%
16,601
24%
55%
21%
27%
53%
65%
10%
4%
20%
18%
70%
15%
6%
32%
63%
16%
19%
20%
42%
4%
74%
26%
44%
56%
3 15,961
32 0.20%
30%
45%
10%
9%
10,717
20%
58%
10%
10%
8,075
16%
15%
3%
1%
71%
8%
6,107
15%
14%
3%
1%
73%
8%
4,217
12%
11%
2%
2%
75%
7%
16,654
29%
53%
18%
19%
50%
66%
19%
7%
8%
15%
61%
16%
5%
38%
64%
15%
17%
22%
45%
1%
73%
27%
47%
53%
4 16,035
106

0.67%
19%
40%
12%
23%
10,297
12%
46%
19%
19%
7,898
14%
13%
9%
3%
57%
16%
6,281
13%
12%
9%
3%
59%
16%
3,817
12%
11%
8%
3%
61%
15%
15,289
25%
60%
15%
25%
62%
66%
11%
10%
13%
16%
62%
21%
9%
34%
71%
12%
17%
16%
47%
7%
58%
42%
58%
42%
5 15,857
-72
-0.45%
14%
39%
8%
33%
9,345
15%
44%
10%
29%
9,369
14%
13%
12%
4%
60%
9%
7,983
14%
13%
12%
3%
61%
9%
4,639
13%
12%
9%
3%
63%
10%
14,061
31%
54%
15%
26%
85%
67%
3%
17%
12%
13%
48%
32%
15%
47%
73%
4%
3%
12%
55%
25%
99%
1%
14%
86%
Total
79,643
178

1.12%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/19/2023 23:07 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

3 1
2 4
5 Chrysanthy Blvd
Douglas Rd
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 19, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 1 (Sander), 5 (Gatewood, Pulipati &Terry) and one of 2 (vacant) or 3 (vacant)2026: District 4 (Budge) and the other oneof 2 (vacant) or 3 (vacant) Map layers
Map 507
Census Block
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
3

Map 507
District 1
Total Pop 15,878
Deviation from ideal -51
% Deviation -0.32%
% Hisp 24.9%
% NH White 43%
% NH Black 13%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 9,976
% Hisp 18%
% NH White 49%
% NH Black 18%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 13%
Total 8,263
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black 18%
Total 6,201
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 60%
% NH Black 18%
Total 4,064
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black est. 17%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 15,896
age0-19 29%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 17%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 53%
english 62%
spanish 16%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 15%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 61%
bachelor 15%
graduatedegree 6%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 18%
income 25-50k 24%
income 50-75k 18%
income 75-200k 36%
income 200k-plus 4%
single family 72%
multi-family 28%
rented 48%
owned 52%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 15,912
-17
-0.11%
21%
56%
9%
9%
11,169
14%
70%
6%
8%
9,207
13%
12%
3%
1%
77%
6%
7,379
12%
11%
2%
1%
78%
6%
5,335
10%
9%
2%
1%
80%
6%
16,601
24%
55%
21%
27%
53%
65%
10%
4%
20%
18%
70%
15%
6%
32%
63%
16%
19%
20%
42%
4%
74%
26%
44%
56%
3 15,961
32 0.20%
30%
45%
10%
9%
10,717
20%
58%
10%
10%
8,075
16%
15%
3%
1%
71%
8%
6,107
15%
14%
3%
1%
73%
8%
4,217
12%
11%
2%
2%
75%
7%
16,654
29%
53%
18%
19%
50%
66%
19%
7%
8%
15%
61%
16%
5%
38%
64%
15%
17%
22%
45%
1%
73%
27%
47%
53%
4 16,035
106

0.67%
19%
40%
12%
23%
10,297
12%
46%
19%
19%
7,898
14%
13%
9%
3%
57%
16%
6,281
13%
12%
9%
3%
59%
16%
3,817
12%
11%
8%
3%
61%
15%
15,289
25%
60%
15%
25%
62%
66%
11%
10%
13%
16%
62%
21%
9%
34%
71%
12%
17%
16%
47%
7%
58%
42%
58%
42%
5 15,857
-72
-0.45%
14%
39%
8%
33%
9,345
15%
44%
10%
29%
9,369
14%
13%
12%
4%
60%
9%
7,983
14%
13%
12%
3%
61%
9%
4,639
13%
12%
9%
3%
63%
10%
14,061
31%
54%
15%
26%
85%
67%
3%
17%
12%
13%
48%
32%
15%
47%
73%
4%
3%
12%
55%
25%
99%
1%
14%
86%
Total
79,643
178

1.12%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/19/2023 23:05 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

4 3
5 2
1 Chrysanthy Blvd
Douglas Rd
Coloma
Rd
White Rock Rd
S
W
h
i
t
e
R
o
c
k
R
d
Rancho Cordova2023 Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 19, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:2024: Districts 5 (Sander), 1 (Gatewood, Pulipati &Terry) and one of 3 (vacant) or 4 (vacant)2026: District 2 (Budge) and the other oneof 3 (vacant) or 4 (vacant) Map layers
Map 508
Census Block
Landmark Point
Water Area
Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT
3

Map 508
District 1
Total Pop 15,456
Deviation from ideal -473
% Deviation -2.97%
% Hisp 13.6%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 8%
% Asian-American 34%
Total 9,149
% Hisp 15%
% NH White 44%
% NH Black 10%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 30%
Total 9,164
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 12%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 9%
Total 7,811
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 9%
Total 4,574
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black est. 9%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 13,821
age0-19 31%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 15%
immigrants 26%
naturalized 85%
english 68%
spanish 3%
asian-lang 17%
other lang 12%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 13%
hs-grad 48%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 15%
Child in Household child-under18 47%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 73%
income 0-25k 4%
income 25-50k 3%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 55%
income 200k-plus 25%
single family 99%
multi-family 1%
rented 13%
owned 87%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 16,776
847

5.32%
21%
41%
11%
22%
11,455
13%
49%
15%
19%
8,574
15%
14%
9%
3%
59%
14%
6,761
13%
13%
9%
3%
60%
13%
4,248
12%
12%
7%
3%
63%
13%
17,572
27%
57%
16%
25%
58%
62%
13%
12%
13%
18%
59%
20%
9%
36%
69%
10%
15%
19%
49%
7%
66%
34%
50%
50%
3 16,316
387

2.43%
24%
43%
14%
12%
9,754
19%
45%
21%
13%
8,049
17%
16%
5%
1%
55%
22%
5,969
15%
14%
5%
1%
56%
22%
3,687
14%
13%
5%
2%
56%
21%
14,814
27%
56%
17%
24%
62%
63%
17%
7%
14%
18%
65%
13%
4%
35%
65%
21%
25%
17%
34%
3%
68%
32%
52%
48%
4 15,214
-715
-4.49%
24%
52%
9%
9%
10,782
15%
67%
9%
8%
8,400
14%
13%
3%
1%
74%
8%
6,642
13%
12%
2%
2%
75%
8%
4,780
10%
10%
2%
1%
78%
7%
15,761
24%
55%
20%
23%
52%
71%
11%
5%
13%
14%
68%
15%
6%
32%
64%
17%
17%
19%
43%
4%
73%
27%
47%
53%
5 15,881
-48
-0.30%
25%
49%
10%
10%
10,365
18%
63%
7%
9%
8,625
14%
13%
3%
1%
77%
5%
6,768
13%
12%
3%
1%
78%
5%
4,783
10%
10%
2%
2%
80%
4%
16,534
29%
53%
18%
22%
47%
63%
16%
4%
17%
17%
63%
18%
7%
37%
63%
13%
20%
21%
43%
3%
69%
31%
48%
52%
Total
79,643
1,562

9.81%
22%
45%
11%
17%
51,505
16%
54%
13%
15%
42,812
15%
14%
6%
2%
65%
11%
33,951
13%
13%
6%
2%
66%
11%
22,072
12%
11%
5%
2%
69%
11%
78,502
28%
55%
17%
24%
61%
65%
12%
9%
14%
16%
61%
19%
8%
37%
67%
14%
17%
18%
44%
7%
74%
26%
44%
56%
08/19/2023 23:03 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3