vascular clinic center with over 10 cardiac and vascular labs and 100 exam rooms. The Project also includes the removal of 135 of the existing 136 parking spaces and the development of 378 new parking spaces and other site improvements. The new building(s) will be located near the center of the Eisenhower Health campus (“EMC Campus” or “Campus”), and will include cardiology, cardiothoracic, and cardiovascular surgery.
The second component of the expansion is the $71 million inpatient cardiovascular pavilion, which will replace obsolete infrastructure. This portion will include seven new procedure labs; two electrophysiology labs; two cardiovascular labs; and 32 preoperative, post-anesthesia care units, recover units, and non-invasive procedural suites. This portion of the Project will require state approval given that it is an inpatient hospital reconstruction project—therefore, construction will likely begin in 2025 or 2026.
Another portion of the Project, the Renker Wellness Center, involved a $6 million expansion that added 10,000 square feet of space, and was completed and opened in the beginning of 2023. All of these components, along with seven items in the hospital’s Centers of Excellence, comprise a $256 million capital campaign that launched in November 2021.
SWMSRCC is a labor union representing over 63,000 union carpenters in 10 states, including California, and has a strong interest in well-ordered land use planning and in addressing the environmental impacts of development projects. Individual members of SWMSRCC live, work, and recreate in the City and the surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project’s environmental and social impacts.
SWMSRCC expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearing and proceeding related to this Project.
Gov. Code, § 65009, subd. (b); Pub. Res. Code, § 21177, subd. (a); see Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1199-1203; see also Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Water Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1121.
SWMSRCC incorporates by reference all comments raising issues regarding the Project and its environmental review and associated documents and reports. See California Clean Energy Committee v. City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 191 (citing Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 865, 875) (finding that any party who has objected to a project’s environmental documentation 6-96
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
may assert any issue timely raised by other parties); see also Santa Teresa Citizen Action Group v. City of San Jose (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 689, 701 (citing Pub. Res. Code, § 21177, subds. (a)-(b)) (to attack a decision that is subject to CEQA, the alleged grounds for noncompliance must have been presented to the public agency, and the person attacking the decision must have raised some objection during the administrative proceedings).
Moreover, SWMSRCC requests that the City provide notice for any and all notices referring or related to the Project issued under CEQA (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seq.), and the California Planning and Zoning Law (“Planning and Zoning Law”) (Gov. Code, §§ 65000–65010). California Public Resources Code, sections 21092.2 and 21167, subsection (f) and California Government Code, section 65092 require agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency’s governing body.
I. THE CITY SHOULD REQUIRE THE USE OF A LOCAL SKILLED
AND TRAINED WORKFORCE TO BENEFIT THE CITY’S
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT.
The City should require that the Project be built using local workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor-Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the State of California, have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a program, or are registered apprentices in such a program.
Community benefits such as local hire can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impacts of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note:
[A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.
6-97
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
March 8, 2021, SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling.
Workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded:
[L]abor should be considered an investment rather than a cost—and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California’s workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well-trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.1
Furthermore, workforce policies have significant environmental benefits given that they improve an area’s jobs-housing balance, decreasing the amount and length of job commutes and the associated greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. In fact, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that the “[u]se of a local state-certified apprenticeship program” can result in air pollutant reductions.2 Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits.
As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008:
People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.3
1 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ Putting-California-on- the- High-Road.pdf.
2 South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 – Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve Supporting Budget Actions, available at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2021/2021-May7-027.pdf?sfvrsn=10. 3 California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance at p. 6, available at https://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cpr-jobs- housing.pdf.
6-98
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
Moreover, local hire mandates and skill-training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”). As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan have noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions given that the skill requirements of available local jobs must match those held by local residents.4 Some municipalities have even tied local hire and other workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. Cervero and Duncan note that:
In nearly built-out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing. The city’s First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate-level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment-ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits.
Recently, the State of California verified its commitment towards workforce development through the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, otherwise known as Assembly Bill No. 2011 (“AB2011”). AB2011 amended the Planning and Zoning Law to allow ministerial, by-right approval for projects being built alongside commercial corridors that meet affordability and labor requirements.
The City should consider utilizing local workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and to mitigate GHG emissions, improve air quality, and reduce transportation impacts.
II. THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
A. Background Concerning Environmental Impacts Reports.
The California Environmental Quality Act is a California statute designed to inform decision-makers and the public about the potential significant environmental effects
4 Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs- Housing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), 475-490, 482, available at http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT- 825.pdf.
6-99
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
of a project. CEQA Guidelines, § 15002, subd. (a)(1).5 At its core, its purpose is to “inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made.” Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564.
CEQA directs public agencies to avoid or reduce environmental damage, when possible, by requiring alternatives or mitigation measures. CEQA Guidelines, § 15002, subds. (a)(2)-(3); see also Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay Committee v. Board of Port Commissioners of the City of Oakland (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1354; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 400. The Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) serves to provide public agencies and the public in general with information about the effect that a proposed project is likely to have on the environment and to “identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced.” CEQA Guidelines, § 15002, subd. (a)(2). If the project has a significant effect on the environment, the agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has “eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible” and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are “acceptable due to overriding concerns” specified in Public Resources Code section 21081. See CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15092, subds. (b)(2)(A)-(B).
While the courts review an EIR using an ‘abuse of discretion’ standard, the reviewing court is not to uncritically rely on every study or analysis presented by a project proponent in support of its position. Berkeley Keep Jets, supra, 91 Cal.App.4th at p. 1355 (quoting Laurel Heights, supra, 47 Cal.3d at pp. 391, 409 fn. 12) (internal quotations omitted). A clearly inadequate or unsupported study is entitled to no judicial deference. Id. Drawing this line and determining whether the EIR complies with CEQA’s information disclosure requirements presents a question of law subject to independent review by the courts. Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, 515; Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of Madera (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 48, 102, 131. As the First District Court of Appeal has previously stated, prejudicial abuse of discretion occurs if the failure to include relevant information precludes informed
5 The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq., are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the implementation of CEQA. Pub. Res. Code, § 21083. The CEQA Guidelines are given “great weight in interpreting CEQA except when . . . clearly unauthorized or erroneous.” Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204, 217. 6-100
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
decision-making and informed public participation, thereby thwarting the statutory goals of the EIR process. Berkeley Keep Jets, supra, 91 Cal.App.4th at p. 1355 (internal quotations omitted).
The preparation and circulation of an EIR is more than a set of technical hurdles for agencies and developers to overcome. Communities for a Better Environment v. Richmond (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 70, 80 (quoting Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 449-450). The EIR’s function is to ensure that government officials who decide to build or approve a project do so with a full understanding of the environmental consequences and, equally important, that the public is assured those consequences have been considered. Id. For the EIR to serve these goals it must present information so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed, and the public must be given an adequate opportunity to comment on that presentation before the decision to go forward is made. Id.
A strong presumption in favor of requiring preparation of an EIR is built into CEQA.
This presumption is reflected in what is known as the “fair argument” standard under which an EIR must be prepared whenever substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1597, 1602; Friends of “B” St. v. City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal.3d 988, 1002.
The fair argument test stems from the statutory mandate that an EIR be prepared for any project that “may have a significant effect on the environment.” Pub. Res. Code, § 21151; see No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.App.3d 68, 75 (hereafter, “No Oil”); accord Jensen v. City of Santa Rosa (2018) 23 Cal.App.5th 877, 884 (hereafter, “Jensen”). Under this test, if a proposed project is not exempt and may cause a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency must prepare an EIR. Pub. Res.
Code, §§ 21100, subd. (a), 21151; CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15064, subds. (a)(1), (f)(1). An EIR may be dispensed with only if the lead agency finds no substantial evidence in the initial study or elsewhere in the record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. Berkeley City Council (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 768, 785. In such a situation, the lead agency must adopt a negative declaration. Pub. Res. Code, § 21080, subd. (c)(1); CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15063, subd. (b)(2), 15064, subd. (f)(3).
6-101
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
“Significant effect upon the environment” is defined as “a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in the environment.” Pub. Res. Code, § 21068; CEQA Guidelines, § 15382. A project may have a significant effect on the environment if there is a reasonable probability that it will result in a significant impact. No Oil, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at p. 83 fn. 16; see Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 309 (hereafter, “Sundstrom”). If any aspect of the project may result in a significant impact on the environment, an EIR must be prepared even if the overall effect of the project is beneficial. CEQA Guidelines, § 15063, subd. (b)(1); see County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. County of Kern (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1580.
This standard sets a “low threshold” for preparation of an EIR. Consolidated Irrigation Dist. v. City of Selma (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 187, 207; Nelson v. County of Kern (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 252; Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 928; Bowman v. City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 572, 580; Citizen Action to Serve All Students v. Thornley (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 748, 754; Sundstrom, supra, 202 Cal.App.3d at p. 310. If substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the project may have a significant environmental effect, the lead agency must prepare an EIR even if other substantial evidence before it indicates the project will have no significant effect. See Jensen, supra, 23 Cal.App.5th at p. 886; Clews Land & Livestock v. City of San Diego (2017) 19 Cal.App.5th 161, 183; Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. v. County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 150; Brentwood Assn. for No Drilling, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 491; Friends of “B” St., 106 Cal.App.3d 988; CEQA Guidelines, § 15064, subd. (f)(1).
B. Background Concerning Initial Studies, Negative Declarations, and Mitigated Negative Declarations.
CEQA and CEQA Guidelines are strict and unambiguous about when an MND may be used. A public agency must prepare an EIR whenever substantial evidence supports a “fair argument” that a proposed project “may have a significant effect on the environment.” Pub. Res. Code, §§ 21100, 21151; CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15002, subds. (f)(1)-(2), 15063; No Oil, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at p. 75; Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 111-112.
Essentially, should a lead agency be presented with a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall prepare an EIR even though it may also be presented with other substantial evidence that the project will not have a significant effect. CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15064(f)(1)-(2); see No Oil, 6-102
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at p. 75 (internal citations and quotations omitted). Substantial evidence includes “enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from this information that a fair argument can be made to support a conclusion, even though other conclusions might also be reached.” CEQA Guidelines, § 15384, subd. (a).
The fair argument standard is a “low threshold” test for requiring the preparation of an EIR. No Oil, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at p. 84; County Sanitation, supra, 127 Cal.App.4th at p. 1579. It “requires the preparation of an EIR where there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial[.]” County Sanitation, supra, 127 Cal.App.4th at p. 1580 (quoting CEQA Guidelines, § 15063, subd. (b)(1)). A lead agency may adopt an MND only if “there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.” CEQA Guidelines, § 15074, subd. (b).
Evidence supporting a fair argument of a significant environmental impact triggers preparation of an EIR regardless of whether the record contains contrary evidence.
League for Protection of Oakland’s Architectural and Historical Resources v. City of Oakland (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 896, 904-905. “Where the question is the sufficiency of the evidence to support a fair argument, deference to the agency’s determination is not appropriate[.]” County Sanitation, supra, 127 Cal.App.4th at p. 1579 (quoting Sierra Club v. County of Sonoma (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1307, 1317-1318).
Further, it is the duty of the lead agency, not the public, to conduct the proper environmental studies. “The agency should not be allowed to hide behind its own failure to gather relevant data.” Sundstrom, supra, 202 Cal.App.3d at p. 311. “Deficiencies in the record may actually enlarge the scope of fair argument by lending a logical plausibility to a wider range of inferences.” Ibid; see also Gentry v. City of Murrieta (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1359, 1382 (lack of study enlarges the scope of the fair argument which may be made based on the limited facts in the record).
Thus, refusal to complete recommended studies lowers the already low threshold to establish a fair argument. The court may not exercise its independent judgment on the omitted material by determining whether the ultimate decision of the lead agency would have been affected had the law been followed. Environmental Protection Information Center v. Cal. Dept. of Forestry (2008) 44 Cal.4th 459, 486 (internal citations and quotations omitted). The remedy for this deficiency would be for the trial court to issue a writ of mandate. Id.
6-103
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
Both the review for failure to follow CEQA’s procedures and the fair argument test are questions of law, thus, the de novo standard of review applies. Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 435. “Whether the agency’s record contains substantial evidence that would support a fair argument that the project may have a significant effect on the environment is treated as a question of law. Consolidated Irrigation Dist., supra, 204 Cal.App.4th at p. 207; Kostka and Zischke, Practice Under the Environmental Quality Act (2017, 2d ed.) at § 6.76.
In the MND context, courts give no deference to the agency. The agency or the court should not weigh expert testimony or decide on the credibility of such evidence—this is the EIR’s responsibility. As stated in Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento:
Unlike the situation where an EIR has been prepared, neither the lead agency nor a court may “weigh” conflicting substantial evidence to determine whether an EIR must be prepared in the first instance.
Guidelines section 15064, subdivision (f)(1) provides in pertinent part: if a lead agency is presented with a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall prepare an EIR even though it may also be presented with other substantial evidence that the project will not have a significant effect. Thus, as Claremont itself recognized, [c]onsideration is not to be given contrary evidence supporting the preparation of a negative declaration.
(2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 935 (internal citations and quotations omitted).
In cases where it is not clear whether there is substantial evidence of significant environmental impacts, CEQA mandates erring on the side of a “preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review.” Mejia v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322, 332 “The foremost principle under CEQA is that the Legislature intended the act to be interpreted in such manner as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language. Friends of Mammoth v. Bd. of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259.
As explained further below, the IS/MND here fails to make certain essential findings.
Further, for a number of findings which the IS/MND does make, it fails to offer support with sufficient analysis and substantial evidence, or it fails to incorporate adequate mitigation measures. Therefore, there is a fair argument that the Project will 6-104
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
have a significant effect on the environment, triggering the “low threshold” standard for preparation of an EIR.
C. Background Concerning CEQA Exemptions.
Where a lead agency chooses to dispose of CEQA by asserting a CEQA exemption, it has a duty to support its CEQA exemption findings by substantial evidence, including evidence that there are no applicable exceptions to exemptions. This duty is imposed by CEQA and related case law. CEQA Guidelines, § 15020 (lead agency shall not knowingly release a deficient document hoping that public comments will correct the defects); see Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. State ex rel. 14th Dist. Agriculture Assn. (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 555, 568 (lead agency has the burden of demonstrating that a project falls within a categorical exemption and must support the determination with substantial evidence); accord Assn. for Protection etc. Values v. City of Ukiah (1991) 2 Cal.App.4th 720, 732 (lead agency is required to consider exemption exceptions where there is evidence in the record that the project might have a significant impact.) The duty to support CEQA and exemption findings with substantial evidence is also required by the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and case law on administrative or traditional writs. Under the CCP, an abuse of discretion is established if the decision is unsupported by the findings, or the findings are unsupported by the evidence. CCP, § 1094.5, subd. (b). In Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. County of Los Angeles, our Supreme Court held that implicit in CCP section 1094.5 is a requirement that the agency which renders the challenged decision must set forth findings to bridge the analytic gap between the raw evidence and ultimate decision or order. (1977) 11 Cal.3d 506, 515 (internal citations and quotations omitted) (hereafter, “Topanga”). The lead agency’s findings may be determined to be sufficient if a court has no trouble under the circumstances discerning the analytic route the administrative agency traveled from evidence to action. West Chandler Blvd. Neighborhood Assn. vs. City of Los Angeles (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 1506, 1521-1522 (internal citations and quotations omitted). However, “mere conclusory findings without reference to the record are inadequate.” Ibid. at p. 1521 (finding city council findings conclusory in violation of Topanga).
Further, CEQA exemptions must be narrowly construed to accomplish CEQA’s environmental objectives. Cal. Farm Bureau Federation v. Cal. Wildlife Conservation Bd. (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 173, 187; accord Save Our Carmel River v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management Dist. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 677, 697 (“These rules ensure that in 6-105
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
all but the clearest cases of categorical exemptions, a project will be subject to some level of environmental review.”)
Finally, CEQA procedures reflect a preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review. See Pub. Res. Code, § 21080, subd. (c) (an EIR may be disposed of only if there is no substantial evidence, in light of the entire record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment or revisions in the project); CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15061, subd. (b)(3) (common sense exemption only where it can be seen with certainty); 15063, subd. (b)(1) (prepare an EIR if the agency determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial]; 15064, subd. (h) (the agency must consider cumulative impacts of past, current, and probable future projects); 15070 (a negative declaration may be prepared only if there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, or project revisions would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment); No Oil, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at pp. 83-84 (significant impacts are to be interpreted so as to afford the fullest possible protection).
III. THE PROJECT IS IMPERMISSIBLY PIECEMEALED IN
VIOLATION OF CEQA.
CEQA forbids “piecemeal” review of the significant environmental impacts of a project and mandates that “the lead agency must consider the whole of an action, not simply its constituent parts, when determining whether it will have a significant environmental effect.” CEQA Guidelines §§ 15003, subd. (h), 15378, subd. (a); see Lighthouse Field Beach Rescue v. City of Santa Cruz (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 1170, 1208. (“The prohibition against piecemeal review is the flip side of the requirement that the whole of a project be reviewed under CEQA. (See Guidelines, § 15378, subd. (a).)”).
Rather, CEQA mandates ‘that environmental considerations do not become submerged by chopping a large project into many little ones—each with a minimal potential impact on the environment—which cumulatively may have disastrous consequences. McCann v. City of San Diego (2021) 70 Cal.App.5th 51 (internal citation and quotations omitted). Different projects “may properly undergo separate 6-106
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
environmental review (i.e., no piecemealing) when the projects . . . can be implemented independently.” Ibid. at 85 (quoting Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1209). Additionally, the question of whether and which actions constitute the ‘whole of an action’ for purposes of CEQA is one of law, which the courts review de novo based on the undisputed facts in the record.” Communities for a Better Environment v. City of Richmond (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 70, 98.
The California Supreme Court has concluded that to avoid piecemealing, an agency’s environmental review of a project under CEQA must address all aspects of a project that are a “reasonably foreseeable consequence” of the project and would be “significant” such that “it will likely change the scope or nature of the initial project or its environmental effects.” Laurel Heights Improvement Association v. Regents of the University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 396. Furthermore, some courts have concluded that a proposed project is part of a larger project for CEQA purposes if the proposed project is a “crucial functional element of the larger project such that, without it, the larger project could not proceed.” Communities for a Better Environment v. City of Richmond (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 98, 99.
CEQA’s piecemealing prohibition stems from two sources—a public agency’s duty to define the project being evaluated by the whole of an action, and its duty to consider the effects, both individual and collective, of all activities involved in the project. Pub.
Res. Code, § 21002.1(d); CEQA Guidelines, § 15378, subds. (a) & (c). Moreover, CEQA’s piecemealing prohibition stems from its requirement to consider the cumulative impacts of all phased or multiple projects which are part of the same general undertaking. CEQA Guidelines, § 15165. For purposes of cumulative impacts analysis, CEQA mandates to consider the impacts of the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15063, subd. (b)(1) (prepare an EIR “if the agency determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial”); 15064, subd. (h) (lead agencies must consider cumulative impacts of past, other current and “probable future” projects). Even if the Project’s impacts are significant, its incremental effects, when added to other past, present, and probable future projects, can be cumulatively significant. CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15065, subd. (a)(3), 15130, subd. (b)(1)(A), 15355, subd. (b).
6-107
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
The California Supreme Court has defined piecemealing as chopping a large project into many little ones, each with a minimal potential impact on the environment – which cumulatively may have disastrous consequences. Bozung v. Local Agency Formation Comm. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 263, 283-284 (quotations omitted). Thus, identifying and studying the “whole of the project” is crucial to attainment of CEQA’s goals of properly disclosing and mitigating environmental impacts. ‘Project’ is given a broad interpretation in order to maximize protection of the environment. San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 713, 730.
Even when a developer obtains a right to construct or has completed one or more pieces of a larger project that has so far evaded full environmental review, the City and the courts have the right, indeed the duty, to remedy the wrong. This includes stopping the challenged incomplete parts and ordering a comprehensive environmental review of the entire project using a corrected project description and baseline. See Arviv Enterprises, Inc. v. South Valley Area Planning Comm. (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 1333 is on point. There, a Los Angeles developer had an overall plan to build 21 homes in the Mulholland community along Woodstock Road. Ibid. at 1336.
Rather than present the “whole” of its action as part of an EIR or other comprehensive review, the developer chopped the larger project into pieces—one of five homes, another of two homes, and another of 14 homes. Ibid. at 1338, 1343. The developer then separately processed each via CEQA exemptions or MNDs.
The City recognized the developer’s attempted circumvention of CEQA and required developer to obtain an EIR for a 21-house development rather than proceed in a piecemeal manner. The developer sued the City, arguing against preparation of an EIR. Ibid. at 1343. The trial court rejected the developer’s position, and the Court of Appeal affirmed, holding that the significance of an accurate project description is manifest, where, as here, cumulative environmental impacts may be disguised or minimized by filing numerous, serial applications. Ibid. at 1346 (quotations omitted). “One way to evaluate which acts are part of a project is to examine how closely related the acts are to the overall objective of the project.” Tuolumne County Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Sonora (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 1214, 1226. “Another way to phrase the question of whether a particular act is a step taken towards the achievement of the proponent’s objective is to ask whether the act is part of a coordinated endeavor. POET, LLC v. State Air Resources Bd. (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 52, 75, fn. 15 (quotations omitted).
6-108
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
The failure to analyze the whole of the project, and thereby allow the true impacts, including cumulative impacts of the various parts added together, to escape review, is potentially “disastrous,” and should not be allowed. Bozung, supra, 13 Cal.3d at 283- 284. Consistent with Arviv, an EIR is also required on piecemealing grounds to properly analyze regulatory threshold exceedances caused by a project applicant’s coordinated endeavor. For example, under CEQA Guidelines, § 15206, subd. (b)(2)(D), a proposed hotel with more than 500 rooms shall be deemed regionally/area wide significant. This determination may not be possible where a project is piecemealed. Similarly, under Public Resources Code, § 21155.1, there are numerous limitations and requirements that the project must meet, including a cap of maximum 200 units, which cannot be properly assessed where a project is piecemealed.
CEQA’s piecemealing prohibition—particularly for later phases or last act project components—is also critical as it results in an improperly inflated and inaccurate baseline and fundamentally inaccurate “no project” alternatives designation, which, in turn, taints the entire CEQA review. POET, LLC v. State Air Resources Bd. (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 52, 83 (use of an inflated baseline had the effect of understating the increase of impacts, requiring reversal); see also CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15126.6, subd. (e)(2), 15125, subd. (a)(1) (both the “no project” alternative and the baseline consider the existing environmental conditions). It is well-settled that, without an adequate baseline, the “analysis of impacts, mitigation measures and project alternatives becomes impossible.” County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water Agency (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 931, 953.
Alternatively, even if various parts of the project are sufficiently separate and do not constitute a whole of an action, CEQA requires that the environmental review of the project include impacts of the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. See CEQA Guidelines, §§15065, subd. (a)(3), 15130, subd. (b)(1)(A), 15355, subd. (b). In fact, courts treat piecemealing and failure to study cumulative impacts of related approvals as alternative theories. San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v.
County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 713, 733 (“even assuming the sewer expansion was severable from the development project, the FEIR still did not comply with CEQA” for failure to consider their cumulative impacts). Thus, in analyzing a Project’s cumulative impacts, it’s important to analyze not just the impacts of the Project itself but also consider impacts from all other related projects as well. 6-109
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
Evidence of Applicant’s “coordinated endeavor” to avoid proper CEQA review is manifest in this case. According to the City, the original Eisenhower Medical Center Specific Plan Amendment #3 (“EMC SP”) and 2003 EIR remain valid documents.
That the EMC SP mandates that all future site plan applications require public hearings be held and that the Development Plan review process is discretionary does not save the Project from its piecemealing CEQA violation. The SR claims that “[c]ircumstances on the EMC Campus, build out assumptions in the Specific Plan and its related EIR have not changed and remain valid.” SR, p. 2. For any lead agency, applicant, project application document, or environmental review document to accurately analyze circumstances 20 years into the future is a feat of untold foretelling.
The 2003 EIR could not have mentioned several conditions, circumstances, and characteristics of the Project, Site, or environmental conditions currently in place— though to remain valid, it should have.
As a reminder, the original EIR was certified in 2003. Now, Applicant comes before the PC to request approval for a two-phase development to first demolish an existing one-story, 34,416-square-foot Desert Cardiology Center; second to construct a four- story building; third to demolish the north and center buildings of the Desert Cardiology Center; and finally, to construct a three-story building. Additionally, according to some sources, the Project includes another building the construction of which is anticipated to begin in 2025 or 2026. This building has not been included in the application materials before the PC nor is it analyzed in the Staff Report. Lastly, the Renker Wellness Center added 10,000 square feet and was completed in the beginning of 2023.
As a result of piecemealing or alternatively failure to review the cumulative impacts of the project’s related parts or components, there is informational deficiency and overall impossibility to meaningfully assess the Project’s impacts or entitlement to a CEQA exemption and the proposed CEQA clearance is legally and factually unsupported.
IV. THE PROJECT REQUIRES A REVISED AND RECIRCULATED,
PROJECT-SPECIFIC EIR AS IT DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR
EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15162.
A. The 2003 EIR Requires Substantial Revisions.
The CEQA Guidelines provide that an EIR must be revised and recirculated whenever circumstances involving a project have changed. A substantial revision 6-110
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
includes the identification of new, avoidable significant effects requiring mitigation measures or project revisions to be added to reduce the effect to less than significant levels or upon the lead agency determining that a proposed mitigation measure or project change would not reduce a potential impact to insignificance. See Jensen, supra, 23 Cal.App.5th at p. 886.
Additionally, when new information is brought to light showing that an impact previously discussed in an environmental report or document—which was found to be insignificant with or without mitigation in the prior analysis—now has the potential for a significant environmental impact as supported by substantial evidence, the environmental document must consider and resolve the conflict in the evidence.
See Visalia Retail, L.P. v. City of Visalia (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 1, 13, 17; accord Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 1099, 1109.
Here, considering the 2003 EIR’s failure to substantiate all of its findings, provide adequate mitigation measures, fully assess all relevant factors, and consider the circumstances surrounding and involving the Project 20 years after its certification, the City must draft and circulate a revised and renewed Project-specific EIR. The CEQA exemption pursuant to § 15162 does not apply where, as here, new information of substantial importance has come to light that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence in 2003. See CEQA Guidelines, § 15152, subd. (a)(3). The Project’s impacts will have significant impacts which were not and could not have been addressed in the 2003 EIR, or those impacts will be substantially more severe than shown in the 2003 EIR.
The 2003 EIR failed to adequately analyze cumulative impacts and could not have reasonably foreseen the currently planned expansions and therefore did not address the Project’s potential impacts. Considering the nature of the proposed Project, though, it may be argued that it is, in fact, reasonable to assume that Applicant and the City could have anticipated and assessed the potential impacts, forecasted the actual or potential effects that the Project would have on the environment, and whether those potential future effects required analysis under CEQA—with sufficient detail to afford the public then (and now) to have reviewed and commented on the impacts and mitigation measures. Population increase figures and diagrams were available in 2003 and could have guided the 2003 EIR’s assessment of future expansions and developments.
6-111
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
In any EIR, environmental impacts should be examined in light of the environment as it exists when a project is approved. See Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1209. Such is not the case here given that the 2003 EIR was prepared and certified roughly two decades ago and when the environment of and surrounding the Site was vastly different.
The 2003 EIR did not analyze the Eisenhower Medical Center Specific Plan impacts under the assumption that the current Project would be built, and therefore did not address cumulative or potential impacts of the Project. For this reason alone, a Project-specific EIR must be prepared. The SR’s claim that the Project “is in substantial compliance with the Eisenhower Medical Center Specific Plan (Amendment #3)” is unsupported and unsubstantiated. The SR states, in essence, that this Project is in substantial compliance with the Specific Plan because it is consistent with the Specific Plan and therefore, no further documentation or further analysis are required. See SR, p. 9. Conclusory statements without evidence or analysis fail to rise to the level of credibility required to constitute a project as exempt from CEQA pursuant to § 15162.
To state that the mitigation measures required by the 2003 EIR are incorporated here also misses the point and fails to afford CEQA the environmental protection it intends. It is reasonable to assume that mitigation measures developed in 2003 fail to grasp the severity or magnitude of environmental and human health issues which plague us today. Measures involving such concepts as renewable energy are necessary to protect environmental and human health and could not have and were in fact not given the proper weight and focus in the 2003 EIR. Similarly, to mandate that “[a]ll applicable conditions of approval and mitigation measures set forth in the Eisenhower Medical Center Specific Plan and the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Third Amendment shall be complied with as part of this project” does little to ensure the Project’s compliance with CEQA or to offer the public the opportunity to comment on the Project, especially given the inaccessibility of the 2003 EIR and supporting documents and analyses. See SR, p. 15. In fact, this Office, on or about March 20, 2023, submitted a California Public Records Act (PRA) request to the City requesting any and all documents—including reports, analyses, studies, and the 2003 EIR. That request was responded to with little more than what can be gathered on the City’s website. The PRA production was substantially out of compliance with the Act, thus preventing this Office from the opportunity to offer thorough and reasoned 6-112
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
comments on the Project. For this reason, the PC should not recommend the Project for approval to the CC and instead defer any ruling or recommendation until the 2003 EIR and supporting reports, analyses, and studies are made available to the public.
Nevertheless, despite the City’s deficient production and unwillingness to provide the public with the opportunity to study and comment upon the Project, the Project does not qualify for the § 15162 CEQA exemption and a new EIR must be prepared.
B. The EIR Fails to Include an Adequate Project Description.
The EIR must be recirculated because it also lacks an adequate Project description. “[A]n accurate, stable and finite project description is the sine qua non of an informative and legally sufficient” environmental document. County of Inyo v. City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, 200. “A curtailed or distorted project description may stultify the objectives of the reporting process” as an accurate, stable, and finite project description is necessary to allow “affected outsiders and public decision- makers balance the proposal’s benefit against its environmental cost, consider mitigation measures, assess the advantage of terminating the proposal (i.e., the “no project” alternative) and weigh other alternatives in the balance. Ibid. at pp. 192-93.
CEQA Guidelines, section 15124 requires a project describe in enough detail to allow for evaluation of its potential environmental impacts: (a) the project’s precise location and boundaries; (b) a clearly written statement of objectives sought by the proposed project; (c) a description of the project’s technical, economic, and environmental characteristics; and (d) a statement describing a list of agencies, permits, and approval which the project expects to use.
The EIR’s Project description does not satisfy this requirement by failing to clearly include a statement of objectives or a description of the Project’s technical, economic, and environmental characteristics. For these reasons too, the EIR must be revised and recirculated.
V. THE PROJECT DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR THE CLASS 32
“INFILL” CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION.
CEQA exemptions must be construed narrowly. County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water Agency (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 931, 966. With respect to Class 32 exemptions for in-fill development projects, in addition to not being subject to the six exemption exceptions identified in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2, the Project must also meet all of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines section 15332, including:
6-113
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations;
b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species;
d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
The Project here fails to comply with all of the required conditions, and thus, does not qualify for the Class 32 “Infill” Exemption. The SR fails to address the Project’s qualifications which would grant it a CEQA exemption pursuant to § 15332.
Additionally, the City lacks substantial evidence to support its determination that the project is consistent with the applicable plans and regulations.
A. The City Lacks Substantial Evidence to Support Its Determinations Regarding the Project’s Significant Impacts.
In order to qualify for the Class 32 Exemption, project approval cannot result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. CEQA Guidelines, § 15332. Lead agencies are required to present substantial evidence to support findings under CEQA. The CEQA Guidelines note that substantial evidence means “enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from this information that a fair argument can be made to support a conclusion.” CEQA Guidelines, § 15384, subd. (a).
CEQA exemptions are reserved for projects without potential to have significant environmental effects. See Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. County of Marin (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 1098, 1107 (if a project may have a significant effect on the environment, CEQA review must occur). The Project at hand has the potential to cause a number of significant environmental effects, rendering the Class 32 CEQA exemption inapplicable.
6-114
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
B. Water Impacts.
The Applicant should be required to state whether it will be relying on groundwater, and if so, the amount of groundwater it will be relying on in order to supply the Project. Without a detailed assessment of the Project’s water demands, it is unclear whether it will be able to meet or significantly impact the goals of the City, County, and State to reliably meet current and future water demands in a sustainable yet cost- effective manner. Additionally, the SR mandates that Applicant submit hydrology studies prior to approval of the Grading Plan. SR, p. 16. Unfortunately, this does not afford the public the opportunity to comment on the Project or its potential water impacts. Such studies must be presented to the public prior to any approvals in order for the Project to substantially comply with CEQA.
C. Geologic and Seismic Impacts.
The Site is located at 39000 Bob Hope Drive in a relatively developed section of Rancho Mirage, California, and is roughly equidistant from the Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway, otherwise known as Interstate 10, and State Route 111. On the opposite sides of each rest the undeveloped Coachella Valley National Wildlife Refuge and Coachella Valley Preserve, and the Mike Dunn Desert Riders Oasis.
According to a Geologic and Seismic Hazards Report6 (“ES Report”) prepared by Earth Systems Pacific in 2018 for a project located one mile north of the Site, the area, though not located within a currently designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or Riverside County designated fault zone, is just four miles southwest of the San Andreas fault system and 5.7 miles southwest of the Mission Creek branch of the San Andreas fault system. Additionally, the Site is underlain predominantly by Holocene dune sand and younger alluvium and is seismically characterized with an ASCE 7-02 and ASCE 7-05 Site Class D soil profile (i.e., stiff soil), meaning it has a high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Additionally, in comparison to Site Classes A through C, Site Class D is weak at smoothly propagating shear waves and will shake and liquefy to a greater extent with shear and surface waves.7 This is alarming considering that the ES Report predicted that there exists a 22% chance that, within the next seven years, a magnitude 7.1 to 7.9 earthquake (major earthquake, serious damage) will hit the
6 Geologic and Seismic Hazards Report Eagle Property, Earth Systems Pacific, March 2018, available at https://ranchomirageca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/eApx_F_Geo.pdf . 7 See Napa Seismic Site Classifications, available at
https://www.napaseismic.org/education/ibc-site-classifications/ . 6-115
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
Coachella segments of the San Andreas fault. For context, a magnitude 7.0 earthquake can cause damage up to 150 miles away.8 In fact, the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake that occurred in Gilroy, California was felt 284 miles away in Reno, Nevada.
The Site also sits within the currently designated “Moderate” liquefaction Susceptibility zone for deep groundwater susceptible sediments per the Riverside County Environmental Hazards Map, though liquefaction potentials are considered “very low.” Nevertheless, the Site sits within or near a “high susceptibility” area for seismically induced settlement per the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan Safety Element.
The Project requires that the potential geologic and seismic impacts be adequately studied and mitigated against. The 2003 EIR could not, and in fact did not, anticipate that a magnitude 7.1 to 7.9 earthquake would occur at or near the Site at some point between 2016 and 2030. Consequently, the EIR must be revised and recirculated to reflect and analyze current and potential environmental conditions in order to comply with CEQA.
Additionally, the SR mandates that Applicant submit a soils report and geological study prior to approval of the Grading Plan. SR, p. 16. Unfortunately, this does not afford the public the opportunity to comment on the Project or its potential impacts. Such studies must be presented to the public prior to any approvals in order for the Project to substantially comply with CEQA.
D. Air Quality and Noise Impacts
The City contends that the Project will not have a significant impact, or no more significant impact than previously studied in the 2003 EIR. SR, p. 24. Specifically, the City claims that the “proposed project will not have any adverse impact on the public health, safety, or welfare; as proposed the project will not create any negative impacts to health[.]” Ibid. The SR fails to provide any proof or substantiation of these claims.
In this regard, the City has failed to support such finding with substantial evidence.
The City relies solely upon Applicant’s compliance with regulatory measures and the 2003 EIR in concluding that the Project will not have significant impacts in this
8 A Word of Weather, Red Flag is Flying . . . And How Far Away Does a 7.0 Earthquake Impact You? (Pt. 2), June 2016, available at https://mikealger.net/2016/06/08/red-flag-is- flying-and-how-far-away-does-a-7-0-earthquake-impact-you-pt- 2/#:~:text=But%20a%207.0%20quake%20can,rapidly%20as%20the%20magnitude%20dro ps.
6-116
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
context. However, determinations that regulatory compliance will be sufficient to prevent significant adverse impacts must be based on a project-specific analysis of potential impacts and the effect of regulatory compliance. See Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Dept. of Food & Agric. (2005) 136 Cal.App.4th 1; accord Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. Department of Forestry & Fire Protection (2008) 43 Cal.App.4th 936, 956. Fatally, the City relies upon regulatory compliance in making its less-than- significant impact determination without offering and assessing Project-specific data on air quality impacts—which is particularly concerning considering the number of sensitive receptors which will remain in very close proximity to the Site. Sensitive receptors are children, the elderly, asthmatics, and people with illnesses or others who are particularly sensitive to environmental impacts or who are at a heightened risk of negative health outcomes due to exposure to air pollution. See California Health and Safety Code, § 42705.5, subd. (a)(5) (the locations where children, the elderly, asthmatics, and others at heightened risk of negative health outcomes due to exposure to air pollution, congregate are considered sensitive receptor locations. Sensitive Receptor locations may also include hospitals) Given that sensitive receptor locations for a project must be identified during the CEQA review process and mitigated against, the Project requires its own environmental review and cannot rely on the outdated 2003 EIR.
As shown in the Campus map here, there exist dozens of buildings within 300 feet of the Desert Cardiology Center building (No. 19). Among the closest and potentially most affected Campus buildings housing and treating sensitive receptors include the Desert Orthopedic Center
(No. 20), Mike and Jan
Salta Health Center (No.
21), Grainger Family
Wound Care Center (No.
22), Larson Foundation
Trauma Center (No. 7),
Tennity Emergency Center
(No. 8), Barbara Sinatra
Children’s Center (No.
24), and Betty Ford Center
(No. 25). The Mike and
Jan Salta Health Center
6-117
I i.-
•
~======'------,
[\ E IS EN HOWER HEALTH * 39000Bo0Hc,peDft,;e Ral'ICflO M~CA922707II0-340-3911
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
offers sensitive receptors comprehensive primary care and internal medicine services, the Grainger Family Wound Care Center houses two hyperbaric chambers which offer oxygen therapy to patients undergoing wound healing, and the Betty Ford Center—comprised of eight buildings—is a rehab center. Each of these buildings houses and treats the most susceptible individuals of the population, yet their health has not been shown to be as valuable as Applicant claims it is.
The SR similarly fails to address the housing development which abuts the Site to the north and south. The closest single-family homes in the development to the north rest no more than 300 feet from the Site, yet the health of these individual—many of them potentially children and the elderly—have not been considered.
The SR glosses over the issue of air quality impacts and sensitive receptors where it mandates that Applicant prepare a Local Air Quality Plan (LAQMP) pursuant to Ordinance No. 855, Municipal Code Chapter 7.01. Although the LAQMP may reasonably detail the Project’s potential impacts upon the air quality of and surrounding the Site and any necessary mitigation measures, such analysis is required at this stage in the process in order to afford the public a reasoned opportunity to comment. To submit the LAQMP at some later point defeats the purpose of allowing projects an environmental and impact review period. Additionally, as previously stated, regulatory compliance does not prove no significant impacts nor does it prove CEQA compliance. The SR also fails to mention the impacts that demolition of the buildings will have on the nearby sensitive receptors—alarming considering the amount of demolition to take place and the nature of the building to be demolished.
Applicant is one of the nation’s top hospitals (and one of the Riverside County-San Bernardino’s top five)—as such, surely the City can expend the energy and resources needed to undertake a Project-specific environmental analysis of air quality and noise impacts in order to afford Applicant’s patrons and patients additional protective measures. And according to Applicant’s website, Applicant is committed to supporting a “healing environment” where a “supportive setting is developed and maintained that embraces the physical, emotional, and spiritual aspects of health and healing.”9 Surely an analysis of Project-specific impacts and mitigation measures is in line with Applicant’s commitment to a healing environment. Fatally, the City has failed to account for the sensitive receptors—namely children, the elderly, and other
9 About Eisenhower Health, Vision Mission, Commitments, Eisenhower Health, available at https://eisenhowerhealth.org/about/eisenhower-health/ . 6-118
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
ill patients utilizing the Campus—occupying the very buildings surrounding the Project Site and just yards away. For these reasons, the Planning Commission should mandate that the City prepare a revised EIR.
E. Due to the COVID-19 Crisis, the City Must Adopt a Mandatory Finding of Significance that the Project May Cause a Substantial Adverse Effect on Human Beings and Mitigate COVID-19 Impacts.
First, CEQA requires that an agency make a finding of significance when a Project may cause a significant adverse effect on human beings. Pub. Res. Code, § 21083, subd. (b)(3); CEQA Guidelines, § 15065, subd. (a)(4).
Public health risks related to construction work require a mandatory finding of significance under CEQA. Construction work has been defined as a lower- to high- risk activity for COVID-19 spread by the Occupations Safety and Health Administration. Recently, several construction sites have been identified as sources of community-wide spreads of COVID-19.
SWMSRCC recommends that the City adopt additional CEQA mitigation measures to mitigate public health risks from the Project’s construction activities. SWMSRCC also requests that the City require safe on-site construction work practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the Project site.
In particular, and based upon its experience with safe construction site work practices, SWMSRCC recommends that the City require that while construction activities are being conducted at the Project Site:
Construction Site Design:
• The Project Site be limited to two controlled entry points. • Entry points have temperature screening technicians taking temperature readings when the entry point is open.
• The Temperature Screening Site Plan shows details regarding access to the Project Site and Project Site logistics for conducting temperature screening. • A 48-hour advance notice be provided to all trades prior to the first day of temperature screening.
• The perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6-foot social distancing position for when you 6-119
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
approach the screening area. Please reference the Apex temperature screening site map for additional details.
• There be clear signage posted at the project site directing you through temperature screening.
• Provide hand washing stations throughout the construction site.
Testing Procedures:
• The temperature screenings used are non-contact devices. • Temperature readings are not to be recorded.
• Personnel be screened upon entering the testing center and should only take one to two seconds per individual.
• Hard hats, head coverings, sweat, dirt, sunscreen, or any other cosmetics must be removed on the forehead before temperature screening. • Anyone who refuses to submit to a temperature screening or does not answer the health screening questions be refused access to the Project Site. • Screenings be performed at both entrances from 5:30 am to 7:30 am at the main gate and personnel gate.
• After 7:30 am, only the main gate entrance continues to be used for temperature testing for anybody gaining entry to the project site such as returning personnel, deliveries, and visitors.
• If the digital thermometer displays a temperature reading above 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit, a second reading will be taken to verify an accurate reading. • If the second reading confirms an elevated temperature, DHS will instruct the individual that he/she will not be allowed to enter the Project Site. DHS will also instruct the individual to promptly notify his/her supervisor and human resources representative and provide them with a copy of Annex A.
Planning:
• Require the development of an Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response Plan that will include basic infection prevention measures (requiring the use of personal protection equipment), policies and procedures for prompt 6-120
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
identification and isolation of sick individuals, social distancing (prohibiting gatherings of no more than 10 people including all-hands meetings and all- hands lunches) communication and training and workplace controls that meet standards that may be promulgated by the Center for Disease Control, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Cal/OSHA, California Department of Public Health or applicable local public health agencies.
The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Carpenters International Training Fund has developed COVID-19 Training and Certification to ensure that Carpenter union members and apprentices conduct safe work practices. The City should require that all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site.
SWMSRCC has also developed a rigorous Infection Control Risk Assessment (ICRA) training program to ensure it delivers a workforce that understands how to identify and control infection risks by implementing protocols to protect themselves and all others during renovation and construction projects in healthcare environments.
The ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect patients during the construction, maintenance, and renovation of healthcare facilities.
These protocols prevent cross-contamination, minimizing the risk of secondary infections in patients at hospital facilities. The City should require that the Project be built using a workforce trained in ICRA protocols.
VI. CONCLUSION
The City’s reliance on the 2003 EIR and on Applicant’s presumed regulatory compliance cannot rectify its failure to draft and circulate a Project-specific EIR. A detailed and thorough review of the Project’s impacts must be studied, supported by substantial evidence, and mitigated against where necessary. Without this in-depth analysis and a higher standard for the quantity and quality of evidence supporting it, it is impossible to determine, with a high degree of certainty, the magnitude and extent of the Project’s environmental impacts.
In light of the aforementioned concerns, SWMSRCC respectfully requests that the City: (1) require a local and skilled workforce for the Project; (2) prepare and circulate a thorough, Project-specific EIR; (3) deem the Project not exempt from CEQA; and, (4) order Applicant to revise the Project to ensure its consistency with all applicable laws and regulations especially those addressing the Project’s potential impacts on 6-121
City of Rancho Mirage – Eisenhower Medical Center Expansion April 13, 2023
human and environmental health. Should the City have any questions or concerns, it should feel free to contact my Office.
Sincerely,
___________________________________
Reza Bonachea Mohamadzadeh
Attorney for Southwest Mountain
States Regional Council of Carpenters
Attached:
March 8, 2021, SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A); Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); and, Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C). 6-122
~(}
EXHIBIT A
6-123
1 2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
March 8, 2021
Mitchell M. Tsai
155 South El Molino, Suite 104
Pasadena, CA 91101
Subject: Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling Dear Mr. Tsai,
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (“SWAPE”) is pleased to provide the following draft technical report explaining the significance of worker trips required for construction of land use development projects with respect to the estimation of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. The report will also discuss the potential for local hire requirements to reduce the length of worker trips, and consequently, reduced or mitigate the potential GHG impacts.
Worker Trips and Greenhouse Gas Calculations
The California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) is a “statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects.”1 CalEEMod quantifies construction-related emissions associated with land use projects resulting from off-road construction equipment; on-road mobile equipment associated with workers, vendors, and hauling; fugitive dust associated with grading, demolition, truck loading, and on-road vehicles traveling along paved and unpaved roads; and architectural coating activities; and paving.2
The number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CalEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on-road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.3
1 “California Emissions Estimator Model.” CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home . 2 “California Emissions Estimator Model.” CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home . 3 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 6-124
Technical Consultation , Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment
2 Specifically, the number and length of vehicle trips is utilized to estimate the vehicle miles travelled (“VMT”) associated with construction. Then, utilizing vehicle-class specific EMFAC 2014 emission factors, CalEEMod calculates the vehicle exhaust, evaporative, and dust emissions resulting from construction-related VMT, including personal vehicles for worker commuting.4
Specifically, in order to calculate VMT, CalEEMod multiplies the average daily trip rate by the average overall trip length (see excerpt below):
“VMTd = Σ(Average Daily Trip Rate i * Average Overall Trip Length i) n Where:
n = Number of land uses being modeled.”5
Furthermore, to calculate the on-road emissions associated with worker trips, CalEEMod utilizes the following equation (see excerpt below):
“Emissionspollutant = VMT * EFrunning,pollutant
Where:
Emissionspollutant = emissions from vehicle running for each pollutant VMT = vehicle miles traveled
EFrunning,pollutant = emission factor for running emissions.”6 Thus, there is a direct relationship between trip length and VMT, as well as a direct relationship between VMT and vehicle running emissions. In other words, when the trip length is increased, the VMT and vehicle running emissions increase as a result. Thus, vehicle running emissions can be reduced by decreasing the average overall trip length, by way of a local hire requirement or otherwise.
Default Worker Trip Parameters and Potential Local Hire Requirements As previously discussed, the number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CalEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on-road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.7 In order to understand how local hire requirements and associated worker trip length reductions impact GHG emissions calculations, it is important to consider the CalEEMod default worker trip parameters. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project- specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.8 The default number of construction-related worker trips is calculated by multiplying the
4 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14-15. 5 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 23. 6 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 7 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 8 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/ , p. 1, 9. 6-125
3 number of pieces of equipment for all phases by 1.25, with the exception of worker trips required for the building construction and architectural coating phases.9 Furthermore, the worker trip vehicle class is a 50/25/25 percent mix of light duty autos, light duty truck class 1 and light duty truck class 2, respectively.”10 Finally, the default worker trip length is consistent with the length of the operational home-to-work vehicle trips.11 The operational home-to-work vehicle trip lengths are:
“[B]ased on the location and urbanization selected on the project characteristic screen. These values were supplied by the air districts or use a default average for the state. Each district (or county) also assigns trip lengths for urban and rural settings” (emphasis added). 12 Thus, the default worker trip length is based on the location and urbanization level selected by the User when modeling emissions. The below table shows the CalEEMod default rural and urban worker trip lengths by air basin (see excerpt below and Attachment A).13
Worker Trip Length by Air Basin
Air Basin Rural (miles) Urban (miles)
Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8
Lake County 16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8
North Central Coast 17.1 12.3
North Coast 16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8
Salton Sea 14.6 11
San Diego 16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8
South Central Coast 16.8 10.8
South Coast 19.8 14.7
Average 16.47 11.17
Minimum 10.80 10.80
Maximum 19.80 14.70
Range 9.00 3.90
9 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 10 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6 , p. 15. 11 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6 , p. 14. 12 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6 , p. 21. 13 “Appendix D Default Data Tables.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05_appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-84 – D-86. 6-126
4 As demonstrated above, default rural worker trip lengths for air basins in California vary from 10.8- to 19.8- miles, with an average of 16.47 miles. Furthermore, default urban worker trip lengths vary from 10.8- to 14.7- miles, with an average of 11.17 miles. Thus, while default worker trip lengths vary by location, default urban worker trip lengths tend to be shorter in length. Based on these trends evident in the CalEEMod default worker trip lengths, we can reasonably assume that the efficacy of a local hire requirement is especially dependent upon the urbanization of the project site, as well as the project location.
Practical Application of a Local Hire Requirement and Associated Impact To provide an example of the potential impact of a local hire provision on construction-related GHG emissions, we estimated the significance of a local hire provision for the Village South Specific Plan (“Project”) located in the City of Claremont (“City”). The Project proposed to construct 1,000 residential units, 100,000-SF of retail space, 45,000-SF of office space, as well as a 50-room hotel, on the 24-acre site. The Project location is classified as Urban and lies within the Los Angeles-South Coast County. As a result, the Project has a default worker trip length of 14.7 miles.14 In an effort to evaluate the potential for a local hire provision to reduce the Project’s construction-related GHG emissions, we prepared an updated model, reducing all worker trip lengths to 10 miles (see Attachment B). Our analysis estimates that if a local hire provision with a 10-mile radius were to be implemented, the GHG emissions associated with Project construction would decrease by approximately 17% (see table below and Attachment C).
Local Hire Provision Net Change
Without Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,623
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 120.77 With Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 100.80 % Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions 17%
As demonstrated above, by implementing a local hire provision requiring 10 mile worker trip lengths, the Project could reduce potential GHG emissions associated with construction worker trips. More broadly, any local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.
This serves as an example of the potential impacts of local hire requirements on estimated project-level GHG emissions, though it does not indicate that local hire requirements would result in reduced construction-related GHG emission for all projects. As previously described, the significance of a local hire requirement depends on the worker trip length enforced and the default worker trip length for the project’s urbanization level and location.
14 “Appendix D Default Data Tables.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05_appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-85. 6-127
5 Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.
Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
6-128
Location Type Location Name Rural H-W
(miles)
Urban H-W
(miles)
Air Basin Great Basin 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Lake County 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Mountain 16.8 10.8
Air Basin North Central 17.1 12.3
Air Basin North Coast 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Northeast 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Sacramento 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Salton Sea 14.6 11
Air Basin San Diego 16.8 10.8
Air Basin San Francisco
10.8 10.8
Air Basin San Joaquin 16.8 10.8
Air Basin South Central 16.8 10.8
Air Basin South Coast 19.8 14.7
Air District Amador County 16.8 10.8
Air District Antelope Valley 16.8 10.8
Air District Bay Area AQMD 10.8 10.8
Air District Butte County 12.54 12.54
Air District Calaveras
16.8 10.8
Air District Colusa County 16.8 10.8
Air District El Dorado
16.8 10.8
Air District Feather River 16.8 10.8
Air District Glenn County 16.8 10.8
Air District Great Basin 16.8 10.8
Air District Imperial County 10.2 7.3
Air District Kern County 16.8 10.8
Air District Lake County 16.8 10.8
Air District Lassen County 16.8 10.8
Air District Mariposa
16.8 10.8
Air District Mendocino
16.8 10.8
Air District Modoc County 16.8 10.8
Air District Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Air District Monterey Bay
16.8 10.8
Air District North Coast
16.8 10.8
Air District Northern Sierra 16.8 10.8
Air District Northern
16.8 10.8
Air District Placer County 16.8 10.8
Air District Sacramento 15 10
Attachment A
6-129
Air District San Diego
16.8 10.8
Air District San Joaquin
16.8 10.8
Air District San Luis Obispo
13 13
Air District Santa Barbara
8.3 8.3
Air District Shasta County 16.8 10.8
Air District Siskiyou County
16.8 10.8
Air District South Coast 19.8 14.7
Air District Tehama County 16.8 10.8
Air District Tuolumne 16.8 10.8
Air District Ventura County 16.8 10.8
Air District Yolo/Solano 15 10
County Alameda 10.8 10.8
County Alpine 16.8 10.8
County Amador 16.8 10.8
County Butte 12.54 12.54
County Calaveras 16.8 10.8
County Colusa 16.8 10.8
County Contra Costa 10.8 10.8
County Del Norte 16.8 10.8
County El Dorado-Lake 16.8 10.8
County El Dorado-16.8 10.8
County Fresno 16.8 10.8
County Glenn 16.8 10.8
County Humboldt 16.8 10.8
County Imperial 10.2 7.3
County Inyo 16.8 10.8
County Kern-Mojave 16.8 10.8
County Kern-San 16.8 10.8
County Kings 16.8 10.8
County Lake 16.8 10.8
County Lassen 16.8 10.8
County Los Angeles-16.8 10.8
County Los Angeles-19.8 14.7
County Madera 16.8 10.8
County Marin 10.8 10.8
County Mariposa 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino-16.8 10.8
County Mendocino-16.8 10.8
County Mendocino-16.8 10.8
County Mendocino-16.8 10.8
County Merced 16.8 10.8
County Modoc 16.8 10.8
County Mono 16.8 10.8
County Monterey 16.8 10.8
County Napa 10.8 10.8
6-130
County Nevada 16.8 10.8
County Orange 19.8 14.7
County Placer-Lake 16.8 10.8
County Placer-Mountain 16.8 10.8
County Placer-16.8 10.8
County Plumas 16.8 10.8
County Riverside-16.8 10.8
County Riverside-
19.8 14.7
County Riverside-Salton 14.6 11
County Riverside-South 19.8 14.7
County Sacramento 15 10
County San Benito 16.8 10.8
County San Bernardino-
16.8 10.8
County San Bernardino-
19.8 14.7
County San Diego 16.8 10.8
County San Francisco 10.8 10.8
County San Joaquin 16.8 10.8
County San Luis Obispo 13 13
County San Mateo 10.8 10.8
County Santa Barbara-
8.3 8.3
County Santa Barbara-
8.3 8.3
County Santa Clara 10.8 10.8
County Santa Cruz 16.8 10.8
County Shasta 16.8 10.8
County Sierra 16.8 10.8
County Siskiyou 16.8 10.8
County Solano-15 10
County Solano-San 16.8 10.8
County Sonoma-North 16.8 10.8
County Sonoma-San 10.8 10.8
County Stanislaus 16.8 10.8
County Sutter 16.8 10.8
County Tehama 16.8 10.8
County Trinity 16.8 10.8
County Tulare 16.8 10.8
County Tuolumne 16.8 10.8
County Ventura 16.8 10.8
County Yolo 15 10
County Yuba 16.8 10.8
Statewide Statewide 16.8 10.8
6-131
Air Basin Rural (miles)Urban (miles)
Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8
Lake County 16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8
North Central Coast 17.1 12.3
North Coast 16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8
Salton Sea 14.6 11
San Diego 16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8
South Central Coast 16.8 10.8
South Coast 19.8 14.7
Average 16.47 11.17
Mininum 10.80 10.80
Maximum 19.80 14.70
Range 9.00 3.90
Worker Trip Length by Air Basin
6-132
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2028Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 1 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Attachment B
6-
1 3
3 --
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
..
.
,
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~--·
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 2 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 3
4 -
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
.
.
-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
I
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 3 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 3
5 -
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
'
~
-
-
•
·
·
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~--
■
~
■■
..
.
■■
■
ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
I
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1713 1.8242 1.1662 2.4000e-
003
0.4169 0.0817 0.4986 0.1795 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 213.1969 213.1969 0.0601 0.0000 214.6993 2022 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 6 1,721.682
6 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
7 2023 0.6148 3.3649 5.6747 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 1.2959 0.3203 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 1,627.529 5 1,627.529
5 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492
5 2024 4.1619 0.1335 0.2810 5.9000e-
004
0.0325 6.4700e-
003
0.0390 8.6300e-
003
6.0400e-
003
0.0147 0.0000 52.9078 52.9078 8.0200e-
003
0.0000 53.1082
Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 6 1,721.682
6 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
7 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 4 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 3
6 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1713 1.8242 1.1662 2.4000e-
003
0.4169 0.0817 0.4986 0.1795 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 213.1967 213.1967 0.0601 0.0000 214.6991 2022 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 3 1,721.682
3 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
3 2023 0.6148 3.3648 5.6747 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 1.2959 0.3203 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 1,627.529 1 1,627.529
1 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492
1 2024 4.1619 0.1335 0.2810 5.9000e-
004
0.0325 6.4700e-
003
0.0390 8.6300e-
003
6.0400e-
003
0.0147 0.0000 52.9077 52.9077 8.0200e-
003
0.0000 53.1082
Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 3 1,721.682
3 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
3 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4103 1.4103
2 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3613 1.3613
3 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1985 1.1985
4 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1921 1.1921
5 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1918 1.1918
6 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0774 1.0774
7 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 1.0320 1.0320
8 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 1.0260 1.0260
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 5 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 3
7 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003
0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003
0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073
2 3,896.073
2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283
3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Unmitigated Operational
9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 1.0265 1.0265
10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8857 2.8857
11 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6207 1.6207
Highest 2.8857 2.8857
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 6 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 3
8 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003
0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003
0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073
2 3,896.073
2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283
3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 7 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 3
9 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
I
I
I
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 8 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 4
0 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
·
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
L
..
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
-
-
+
•
•
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
L
■■
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
■
■
■II
■
■
■II
■
■
■II
■
■
■II
■
■
■II
■
■
■
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 9 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 4
1 --
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
...
-
-
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-+
-
-
.
i
-
-
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.
L
.
-+
-
-
-
-
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■
■
■
•
■
■
■
I.■■
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e-
003
0.0000 7.5100e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004
0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004
0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e-
003
0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 10 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 4
2 1
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
►--
-
►--
-
►--
-
►--
-
t
-
-
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
i-
-
-
-
•
-
-
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
--
-
1 -
__
i
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
I
-
-
I
-
-
I
-
-
I
--
t
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
-
-
-
...
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
L
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
:
-
-
:
-
-
:
-
-
:
--
t
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
l
__
.
l
_
_
.
l
_
_
.
l
_
__
L
__
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
1-
-
-
-
...
---
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
-
-
.
L
-
-
.
L
-
-
.
L
-
-
.
L
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
--
-
-
►
--
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-~
--
-
-1
-
-
-
-
1 _
_
_
_
.
.
_
_
_
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
,
.
,
_
_
_
.
.
.
-----
I I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e-
003
0.0634 0.0148 1.8000e-
004
3.9400e-
003
1.9000e-
004
4.1300e-
003
1.0800e-
003
1.8000e-
004
1.2600e-
003
0.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e-
003
0.0000 17.4869
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.7000e-
004
7.5000e-
004
8.5100e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.4700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.4900e-
003
6.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
6.7000e-
004
0.0000 2.2251 2.2251 7.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.2267
Total 2.9000e-
003
0.0641 0.0233 2.0000e-
004
6.4100e-
003
2.1000e-
004
6.6200e-
003
1.7300e-
003
2.0000e-
004
1.9300e-
003
0.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e-
003
0.0000 19.7136
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e-
003
0.0000 7.5100e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004
0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004
0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e-
003
0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 11 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 4
3 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e-
003
0.0634 0.0148 1.8000e-
004
3.9400e-
003
1.9000e-
004
4.1300e-
003
1.0800e-
003
1.8000e-
004
1.2600e-
003
0.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e-
003
0.0000 17.4869
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.7000e-
004
7.5000e-
004
8.5100e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.4700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.4900e-
003
6.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
6.7000e-
004
0.0000 2.2251 2.2251 7.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.2267
Total 2.9000e-
003
0.0641 0.0233 2.0000e-
004
6.4100e-
003
2.1000e-
004
6.6200e-
003
1.7300e-
003
2.0000e-
004
1.9300e-
003
0.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e-
003
0.0000 19.7136
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004
0.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004
0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 12 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 4
4 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.7000e-
004
6.0000e-
004
6.8100e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.9700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.9900e-
003
5.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
5.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.7814
Total 7.7000e-
004
6.0000e-
004
6.8100e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.9700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.9900e-
003
5.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
5.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.7814
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004
0.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004
0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 13 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 4
5 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.7000e-
004
6.0000e-
004
6.8100e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.9700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.9900e-
003
5.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
5.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.7814
Total 7.7000e-
004
6.0000e-
004
6.8100e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.9700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.9900e-
003
5.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
5.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.7814
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003
0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003
0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 14 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 4
6 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6400e-
003
1.2700e-
003
0.0144 4.0000e-
005
4.1600e-
003
3.0000e-
005
4.2000e-
003
1.1100e-
003
3.0000e-
005
1.1400e-
003
0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e-
004
0.0000 3.7607
Total 1.6400e-
003
1.2700e-
003
0.0144 4.0000e-
005
4.1600e-
003
3.0000e-
005
4.2000e-
003
1.1100e-
003
3.0000e-
005
1.1400e-
003
0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e-
004
0.0000 3.7607
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003
0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003
0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 15 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 4
7 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6400e-
003
1.2700e-
003
0.0144 4.0000e-
005
4.1600e-
003
3.0000e-
005
4.2000e-
003
1.1100e-
003
3.0000e-
005
1.1400e-
003
0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e-
004
0.0000 3.7607
Total 1.6400e-
003
1.2700e-
003
0.0144 4.0000e-
005
4.1600e-
003
3.0000e-
005
4.2000e-
003
1.1100e-
003
3.0000e-
005
1.1400e-
003
0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e-
004
0.0000 3.7607
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004
5.7200e-
003
5.7200e-
003
5.2600e-
003
5.2600e-
003
0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003
0.0000 19.2414
Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004
0.0807 5.7200e-
003
0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e-
003
0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003
0.0000 19.2414
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 16 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 4
8 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e-
004
2.1000e-
004
2.4400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.7000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.7000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.6684
Total 2.8000e-
004
2.1000e-
004
2.4400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.7000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.7000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.6684
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004
5.7200e-
003
5.7200e-
003
5.2600e-
003
5.2600e-
003
0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003
0.0000 19.2414
Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004
0.0807 5.7200e-
003
0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e-
003
0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003
0.0000 19.2414
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 17 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 4
9 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e-
004
2.1000e-
004
2.4400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.7000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.7000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.6684
Total 2.8000e-
004
2.1000e-
004
2.4400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.7000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.7000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.6684
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003
0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003
0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 18 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 5
0 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e-
003
0.1140 3.1800e-
003
0.1171 0.0329 3.0400e-
003
0.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435
Worker 0.4088 0.3066 3.5305 0.0107 1.1103 8.8700e-
003
1.1192 0.2949 8.1700e-
003
0.3031 0.0000 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 0.0000 967.4773
Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 0.3390 0.0000 1,408.795 2 1,408.795
2 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003
0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003
0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 19 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 5
1 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e-
003
0.1140 3.1800e-
003
0.1171 0.0329 3.0400e-
003
0.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435
Worker 0.4088 0.3066 3.5305 0.0107 1.1103 8.8700e-
003
1.1192 0.2949 8.1700e-
003
0.3031 0.0000 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 0.0000 967.4773
Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 0.3390 0.0000 1,408.795 2 1,408.795
2 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003
0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003
0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 20 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 5
2 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e-
003
0.1113 1.4600e-
003
0.1127 0.0321 1.4000e-
003
0.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624
Worker 0.3753 0.2708 3.1696 0.0101 1.0840 8.4100e-
003
1.0924 0.2879 7.7400e-
003
0.2957 0.0000 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 0.0000 909.9291
Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e-
003
1.2051 0.3200 9.1400e-
003
0.3292 0.0000 1,327.336
9 1,327.336
9 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003
0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003
0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 21 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 5
3 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e-
003
0.1113 1.4600e-
003
0.1127 0.0321 1.4000e-
003
0.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624
Worker 0.3753 0.2708 3.1696 0.0101 1.0840 8.4100e-
003
1.0924 0.2879 7.7400e-
003
0.2957 0.0000 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 0.0000 909.9291
Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e-
003
1.2051 0.3200 9.1400e-
003
0.3292 0.0000 1,327.336
9 1,327.336
9 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e-
003
0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003
0.0000 13.1227
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e-
003
0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003
0.0000 13.1227
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 22 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 5
4 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e-
004
2.7000e-
004
3.1200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0800e-
003
2.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.9000e-
004
0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8968
Total 3.7000e-
004
2.7000e-
004
3.1200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0800e-
003
2.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.9000e-
004
0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8968
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e-
003
0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003
0.0000 13.1227
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e-
003
0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003
0.0000 13.1227
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 23 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 5
5 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e-
004
2.7000e-
004
3.1200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0800e-
003
2.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.9000e-
004
0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8968
Total 3.7000e-
004
2.7000e-
004
3.1200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0800e-
003
2.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.9000e-
004
0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8968
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003
0.0000 22.2073
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003
0.0000 22.2073
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 24 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 5
6 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.9000e-
004
4.1000e-
004
4.9200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.8100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.8200e-
003
4.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.9000e-
004
0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.4706
Total 5.9000e-
004
4.1000e-
004
4.9200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.8100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.8200e-
003
4.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.9000e-
004
0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.4706
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003
0.0000 22.2073
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003
0.0000 22.2073
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 25 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 5
7 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.9000e-
004
4.1000e-
004
4.9200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.8100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.8200e-
003
4.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.9000e-
004
0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.4706
Total 5.9000e-
004
4.1000e-
004
4.9200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.8100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.8200e-
003
4.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.9000e-
004
0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.4706
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e-
003
0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004
0.0000 4.4745
Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004
0.0000 4.4745
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 26 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 5
8 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0101 6.9900e-
003
0.0835 2.8000e-
004
0.0307 2.3000e-
004
0.0309 8.1500e-
003
2.2000e-
004
8.3700e-
003
0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e-
004
0.0000 24.9558
Total 0.0101 6.9900e-
003
0.0835 2.8000e-
004
0.0307 2.3000e-
004
0.0309 8.1500e-
003
2.2000e-
004
8.3700e-
003
0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e-
004
0.0000 24.9558
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e-
003
0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004
0.0000 4.4745
Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004
0.0000 4.4745
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 27 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 5
9 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0101 6.9900e-
003
0.0835 2.8000e-
004
0.0307 2.3000e-
004
0.0309 8.1500e-
003
2.2000e-
004
8.3700e-
003
0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e-
004
0.0000 24.9558
Total 0.0101 6.9900e-
003
0.0835 2.8000e-
004
0.0307 2.3000e-
004
0.0309 8.1500e-
003
2.2000e-
004
8.3700e-
003
0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e-
004
0.0000 24.9558
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 28 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 6
0 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
1 __
_
_
.. __
_
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
, .. --
...
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 29 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 6
1 -----
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
'
-
-
-
-
.
.
--
-
•
-
-
•
■44
.
■ ■ ■ ■
I
---------
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
. .
. ..
. .
. .
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
■ ■111 ■ ■111 ■ ■1111 ■ ■1111 ■ ■11 ■ ■1111 ■ I
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
■ •
•
■ •
•
■ •
•
■ •
•
■ •
•
■ •
•
■ I
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
..
L
-
..
L
-
..
L
-
.
.
L
-.
.
L
-.
.
L
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
·
. -:
. -:
. ·:
. ·:
. ·:
. -:
..
-
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11
5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 30 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 6
2 I
I
I
I
I
I
~
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
1 -
-
.
.
.
-
•
·
·
~
·
·
~
·
·
~
·
·
~
·
·
~
·
·
~
·
·
~
--
•
-
-
•
-
-
•
-
-
•
-
-
•
-
-
•
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,_
_
--
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
•
-
-
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 i
-
-
.
.
.
-•
·
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
•
!
•
•
.
.
.
.
.
.
--
.
' ' ' ' ' ' '
-
-
-
-
-
.
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
~ ..
~ ..
,
■
■
■
I ~---
~
-
-
-
~
·
·
·
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
■ ■ •
·
■ ■ •
·
■ ■ •
·
■ ■ ■•
■ ■ •
·
■ ■ •
·
■■
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
.
.
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003
0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003
0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 31 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 6
3 -----
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 -
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 -
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 -
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 .
.
.
.
l
.
.
.
.
l
.
.
.
.
L
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
--
-
-
..
--
-
•
-
-
-
-
4 4
..
.
.
.
.
44 ..
.
.
.
.
44 .
■ ■ ■ ■
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 -
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 -
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 -
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 -
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 -
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 -
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 -
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 I
I
1 .
.
.
.
l
.
.
.
.
l
.
.
.
.
L
•
•
•
•
---------
. .
. ..
. .
. ..
. .
. ..
. .
. .
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e-
003
0.0188 8.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e-
003
0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e-
003
0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e-
004
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
0.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e-
004
4.6000e-
004
25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e-
003
0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e- 003
8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel 1.74095e
+006
9.3900e-
003
0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e-
004
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
0.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e-
003
1.7000e-
003
93.4557
Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e-
003
0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e-
004
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e-
003
1.8100e-
003
99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e-
004
4.5000e-
003
3.7800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
0.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
4.9301
Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003
0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 32 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 6
4 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e-
003
0.0188 8.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e-
003
0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e-
003
0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e-
004
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
0.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e-
004
4.6000e-
004
25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e-
003
0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e- 003
8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel 1.74095e
+006
9.3900e-
003
0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e-
004
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
0.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e-
003
1.7000e-
003
93.4557
Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e-
003
0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e-
004
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e-
003
1.8100e-
003
99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e-
004
4.5000e-
003
3.7800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
0.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
4.9301
Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003
0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 33 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 6
5 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e-
003
1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e-
003
1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e-
003
9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e-
003
2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 34 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 6
6 -
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
•
•
•
-
L
.
.
.
.
L .
.
.
.
L .
.
.
.
L .
.
.
.
L .
.
.
.
L
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
~
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e-
003
1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e-
003
1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e-
003
9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e-
003
2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 35 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 6
7 -
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
•
•
•
-
L
.
.
.
.
L .
.
.
.
L .
.
.
.
L .
.
.
.
L .
.
.
.
L
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
~
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003
0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003
0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e-
003
0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e- 003
3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e-
004
0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e-
003
0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 36 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 6
8 -----
-
-
-
-t
-
-
-
-
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
'
--
-
-
.. --
-
•
-
-
-
-
·
·
·
·
·
I
---------
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
-
--
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
. .
. ..
. .
. .
--------------
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e-
003
0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e- 003
3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e-
004
0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e-
003
0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 37 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 6
9 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
__
_
_
_
_
,.
__
_
_
_
_
,.
__
_
_
_
_
,.
__
_
_
_
_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 38 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 7
0 ---
-
-
-
-t
-
-
-
-
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
. .
. ..
. .
. .
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e-
003
12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e-
003
61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e-
003
62.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e-
003
7.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e-
003
13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e-
003
31.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 39 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 7
1 -
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
-
L
•
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L .
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
~
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e-
003
12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e-
003
61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e-
003
62.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e-
003
7.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e-
003
13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e-
003
31.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 40 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 7
2 -
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
-
L
•
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L .
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
~
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 41 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 7
3 ---
-
-
-
-t
-
-
-
-
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
. .
. ..
. .
. .
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 42 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 7
4 -
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
-
L
•
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L .
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
~
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 43 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 7
5 -
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 -
~
~
~
4 I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
-
L
•
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L •
•
•
.
L .
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
~
11.0 Vegetation
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 44 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 6-
1 7
6 1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2028Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 7
7 --
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
..
.
,
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~--·
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 7
8 -
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
.
.
-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
I
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 3 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 7
9 -
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
'
~
-
-
•
·
·
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~--
■
~
■■
..
.
■■
■
ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
I
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2769 46.4588 31.6840 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,234.797 4 6,234.797
4 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535
2 2022 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 2023 4.8957 26.3317 46.7567 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 10.6482 2.6381 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 14,807.52 69 14,807.52
69 1.0250 0.0000 14,833.15
21 2024 237.1630 9.5575 15.1043 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,361.398 9 2,361.398
9 0.7177 0.0000 2,379.342
1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 4 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 8
0 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2769 46.4588 31.6840 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,234.797 4 6,234.797
4 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535
2 2022 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 2023 4.8957 26.3317 46.7567 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 10.6482 2.6381 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 14,807.52 69 14,807.52
69 1.0250 0.0000 14,833.15
20 2024 237.1630 9.5575 15.1043 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,361.398 9 2,361.398
9 0.7177 0.0000 2,379.342
1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 5 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 8
1 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 16 76,811.18
16 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87
86 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 16 76,811.18
16 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87
86 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 8
2 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-:
-
-
-
-:
-
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
-:
-
-
-
-:
-
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
·
·
-
-
-
-
·
-·
-
-
-
·
-
·
-
-
-
·
-
·
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 8
3 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
·
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
L
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
•
-
-
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
•
-
-
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
-
-
-
I
,
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
L
■ ■
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 8 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 8
4 --
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
...
-
-
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-+
-
-
.
i
-
-
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.
L
.
-+
-
-
-
-
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■
■
■
•
■
■
■
I.■■
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 8
5 1
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
►--
-
►--
-
►--
-
►--
-
t
-
-
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
i-
-
-
-
•
-
-
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
--
-
1 -
__
i
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
I
-
-
I
-
-
I
-
-
I
--
t
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
-
-
-
...
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
L
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
:
-
-
:
-
-
:
-
-
:
--
t
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
l
__
.
l
_
_
.
l
_
_
.
l
_
__
L
__
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
1-
-
-
-
...
---
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
-
-
.
L
-
-
.
L
-
-
.
L
-
-
.
L
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
--
-
-
►
--
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-~
--
-
-1
-
-
-
-
1 _
_
_
_
.
.
_
_
_
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
,
.
,
_
_
_
.
.
.
-----
I I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0643 0.0442 0.6042 1.7100e-
003
0.1677 1.3500e-
003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e-
003
0.0457 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e-
003
170.9413
Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.1309 1,463.056 8 1,463.056
8 0.0927 1,465.375
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 8
6 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0643 0.0442 0.6042 1.7100e-
003
0.1677 1.3500e-
003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e-
003
0.0457 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e-
003
170.9413
Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.1309 1,463.056 8 1,463.056
8 0.0927 1,465.375
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 8
7 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e-
003
0.2012 1.6300e-
003
0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003
0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e-
003
205.1296
Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e-
003
0.2012 1.6300e-
003
0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003
0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e-
003
205.1296
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 8
8 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e-
003
0.2012 1.6300e-
003
0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003
0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e-
003
205.1296
Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e-
003
0.2012 1.6300e-
003
0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003
0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e-
003
205.1296
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 8
9 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e-
003
0.2236 1.8100e-
003
0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003
0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e-
003
227.9217
Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e-
003
0.2236 1.8100e-
003
0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003
0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e-
003
227.9217
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 9
0 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e-
003
0.2236 1.8100e-
003
0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003
0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e-
003
227.9217
Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e-
003
0.2236 1.8100e-
003
0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003
0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e-
003
227.9217
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 9
1 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e-
003
0.2236 1.7500e-
003
0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003
0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e-
003
219.8941
Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e-
003
0.2236 1.7500e-
003
0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003
0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e-
003
219.8941
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 9
2 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e-
003
0.2236 1.7500e-
003
0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003
0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e-
003
219.8941
Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e-
003
0.2236 1.7500e-
003
0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003
0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e-
003
219.8941
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 9
3 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 3.2162 2.1318 29.7654 0.0883 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,800.685 7 8,800.685
7 0.2429 8,806.758
2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 2.7263 12,697.23 39 12,697.23
39 0.4665 12,708.89
66 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 18 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 9
4 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 3.2162 2.1318 29.7654 0.0883 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,800.685 7 8,800.685
7 0.2429 8,806.758
2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 2.7263 12,697.23 39 12,697.23
39 0.4665 12,708.89
66 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 9
5 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 3.0203 1.9287 27.4113 0.0851 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8 8,478.440
8 0.2190 8,483.916
0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 70 12,252.31
70 0.4172 12,262.74
60 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 9
6 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 3.0203 1.9287 27.4113 0.0851 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8 8,478.440
8 0.2190 8,483.916
0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 70 12,252.31
70 0.4172 12,262.74
60 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 9
7 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e-
003
0.1677 1.2800e-
003
0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003
0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e-
003
158.8748
Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e-
003
0.1677 1.2800e-
003
0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003
0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e-
003
158.8748
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 22 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 9
8 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e-
003
0.1677 1.2800e-
003
0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003
0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e-
003
158.8748
Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e-
003
0.1677 1.2800e-
003
0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003
0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e-
003
158.8748
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
1 9
9 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e-
003
0.1677 1.2600e-
003
0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003
0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e-
003
153.9458
Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e-
003
0.1677 1.2600e-
003
0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003
0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e-
003
153.9458
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 0
0 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e-
003
0.1677 1.2600e-
003
0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003
0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e-
003
153.9458
Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e-
003
0.1677 1.2600e-
003
0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003
0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e-
003
153.9458
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 25 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 0
1 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 0
2 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 27 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 0
3 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
.
.
-
-
-
~
4 4
4 ~
.
4 4
4 ~
.
4 4
4 ~
,
.
.
-
-
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
I
_
_
_
_
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 28 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 0
4 -----
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
'
-
-
-
-
.
.
--
-
•
-
-
•
■44
.
■ ■ ■ ■
I
---------
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
. .
. ..
. .
. .
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
■ ■111 ■ ■111 ■ ■1111 ■ ■1111 ■ ■11 ■ ■1111 ■ I
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
■ •
•
■ •
•
■ •
•
■ •
•
■ •
•
■ •
•
■ I
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
..
L
-
..
L
-
..
L
-
.
.
L
-.
.
L
-.
.
L
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
·
. -:
. -:
. ·:
. ·:
. ·:
. -:
..
-
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11
5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 29 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 0
5 I
I
I
I
I
I
~
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
1 -
-
.
.
.
-
•
·
·
~
·
·
~
·
·
~
·
·
~
·
·
~
·
·
~
·
·
~
--
•
-
-
•
-
-
•
-
-
•
-
-
•
-
-
•
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,_
_
--
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
•
-
-
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 i
-
-
.
.
.
-•
·
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
•
!
•
•
.
.
.
.
.
.
--
.
' ' ' ' ' ' '
-
-
-
-
-
.
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
~-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
~ ..
~ ..
,
■
■
■
I ~---
~
-
-
-
~
·
·
·
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
■ ■ •
·
■ ■ •
·
■ ■ •
·
■ ■ ■•
■ ■ •
·
■ ■ •
·
■■
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
.
.
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 30 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 0
6 -----
-
-
-
-t
-
-
-
-
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
'
--
-
-
..
--
-
•
~
~
4 4
·
·
·
·
·
I
---------
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
. .
. ..
. .
. .
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003
0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003
0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e-
003
0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 31 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 0
7 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003
0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003
0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616 2.7100e-
003
0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 32 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 0
8 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-►
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003
0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 33 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 0
9 -----
-
-
-
-t
-
-
-
-
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
'
--
-
-
.. --
-
•
-
-
-
-
·
·
·
·
·
I
---------
I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
-
--
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
'
I I I I I
•
•
•
•
L
•
•
•
•
. .
. ..
. .
. .
--------------
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
·
r
•
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003
0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 34 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 1
0 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
--
-
-
-
.. --
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 35 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 6-
2 1
1 1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2028Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 1
2 --
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
..
.
,
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~--·
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 1
3 -
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
.
.
-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■a-
■
■
■ti
■
■
I
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 3 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 1
4 -
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
'
~
-
-
•
·
·
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
~--
■
~
■■
..
.
■■
■
ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
■ti
■■
I
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2865 46.4651 31.6150 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,221.493 7 6,221.493
7 1.9491 0.0000 6,270.221
4 2022 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 2023 5.2705 26.4914 44.5936 0.1413 9.8688 0.7800 10.6488 2.6381 0.7328 3.3708 0.0000 14,210.34 24 14,210.34
24 1.0230 0.0000 14,235.91
60 2024 237.2328 9.5610 15.0611 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,352.417 8 2,352.417
8 0.7175 0.0000 2,370.355
0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 4 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 1
5 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2865 46.4651 31.6150 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,221.493 7 6,221.493
7 1.9491 0.0000 6,270.221
4 2022 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 2023 5.2705 26.4914 44.5936 0.1413 9.8688 0.7800 10.6488 2.6381 0.7328 3.3708 0.0000 14,210.34 24 14,210.34
24 1.0230 0.0000 14,235.91
60 2024 237.2328 9.5610 15.0611 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,352.417 8 2,352.417
8 0.7175 0.0000 2,370.355
0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 5 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 1
6 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
·
·
·
·
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
·
-
r
·
·
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
--
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 1
7 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-:
-
-
-
-:
-
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
-:
-
-
-
-:
-
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
·
·
-
-
-
-
·
-·
-
-
-
·
-
·
-
-
-
·
-
·
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
_I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 1
8 '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
·
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
L
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
•
-
-
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
•
-
-
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
:
:
:
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
-
-
-
I
,
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
L
■ ■
I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 8 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 1
9 --
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
...
-
-
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-
..
-
-
--
-
-
·•
-
-
·•
-
-+
-
-
.
i
-
-
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.L
•
•
.
L
.
-+
-
-
-
-
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■ ■
■•
■
■
■
•
■
■
■
I.■■
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 2
0 1
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
►--
-
►--
-
►--
-
►--
-
t
-
-
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
i-
-
-
-
•
-
-
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
_
_
I
--
-
1 -
__
i
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
I
-
-
I
-
-
I
-
-
I
--
t
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
-
-
-
...
--
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
L
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
:
-
-
:
-
-
:
-
-
:
--
t
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
l
__
.
l
_
_
.
l
_
_
.
l
_
__
L
__
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
1-
-
-
-
...
---
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L
-
-
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
-
-
.
L
-
-
.
L
-
-
.
L
-
-
.
L
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
--
-
-
►
--
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-~
--
-
-1
-
-
-
-
1 _
_
_
_
.
.
_
_
_
.
4 4
4 4
.
4 4
4 4
,
.
,
_
_
_
.
.
.
-----
I I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 I I I I I
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
.
.
.
.
1 I I I I I I
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0715 0.0489 0.5524 1.6100e-
003
0.1677 1.3500e-
003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e-
003
0.0457 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e-
003
160.9560
Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 2 1,430.693
2 0.0955 1,433.081
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 2
1 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0715 0.0489 0.5524 1.6100e-
003
0.1677 1.3500e-
003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e-
003
0.0457 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e-
003
160.9560
Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 2 1,430.693
2 0.0955 1,433.081
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 2
2 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e-
003
0.2012 1.6300e-
003
0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003
0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e-
003
193.1472
Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e-
003
0.2012 1.6300e-
003
0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003
0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e-
003
193.1472
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 2
3 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e-
003
0.2012 1.6300e-
003
0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003
0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e-
003
193.1472
Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e-
003
0.2012 1.6300e-
003
0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003
0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e-
003
193.1472
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 2
4 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e-
003
0.2236 1.8100e-
003
0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003
0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e-
003
214.6080
Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e-
003
0.2236 1.8100e-
003
0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003
0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e-
003
214.6080
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 2
5 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e-
003
0.2236 1.8100e-
003
0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003
0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e-
003
214.6080
Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e-
003
0.2236 1.8100e-
003
0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003
0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e-
003
214.6080
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 2
6 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e-
003
0.2236 1.7500e-
003
0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003
0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e-
003
207.0563
Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e-
003
0.2236 1.7500e-
003
0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003
0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e-
003
207.0563
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 2
7 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e-
003
0.2236 1.7500e-
003
0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003
0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e-
003
207.0563
Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e-
003
0.2236 1.7500e-
003
0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003
0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e-
003
207.0563
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 2
8 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 3.5872 2.3593 27.1680 0.0832 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,286.901 3 8,286.901
3 0.2282 8,292.605
8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 2.7271 12,075.97 63 12,075.97
63 0.4663 12,087.63
41 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 18 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 2
9 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 3.5872 2.3593 27.1680 0.0832 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,286.901 3 8,286.901
3 0.2282 8,292.605
8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 2.7271 12,075.97 63 12,075.97
63 0.4663 12,087.63
41 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 3
0 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 3.3795 2.1338 24.9725 0.0801 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 8 7,983.731
8 0.2055 7,988.868
3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 25 11,655.13
25 0.4151 11,665.50
99 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 3
1 --
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
1 -
-
-
-
-
t
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
-1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
. .
.
..
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
. ..
.
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 3.3795 2.1338 24.9725 0.0801 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 8 7,983.731
8 0.2055 7,988.868
3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 25 11,655.13
25 0.4151 11,665.50
99 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 6-
2 3
2 --
-
-~
--
-
-~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
-
--
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
'
'
'
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
-
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
·
r
-
-
-
·
r