Redding City Council
December 3, 2024

Reference:

ProposaltoProvideEnvironmentalServicesfortheCityofRedding'sStillwaterBusinessParkPhaseIIRoadwayProjectI I I
technicalstudiesthatmaybe necessarytosupportprojectapprovalandissuanceof regulatorypermits. A staged approach will be used to ensure the current proposed project is compliant with CEQA and NEPA, as described below:

II
Step 1: Preliminary Environmental Review
Reviewthe 2006EIR/EIS, supportingtechnicalstudies, associatedmapping, andanyotherpertinent documentation that is available in the City's project file. i
Determine if the scope of the current project falls within the scope of the program EIR/EIS, if substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances, and if new information of substantial importance has become available since the EIR/ EIS was adopted.

I
Determine if new or updated technical studies would be needed to support the environmental compliance and permitting effort for the Phase II Roadway Project.

Providea memorandumsummarizingthe resultsof the preliminaryenvironmentalreview.

Step 2: Supplemental Studies Documentation and Regulatory Agency Permitting Performanysupplementalsurveys, technicalstudies, andprepareor updatereportsandmapping.

Prepare a CEQA Initial Study/Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Phase II Roadway Project.

Prepare a NEPA re-evaluation/revalidation memorandum or report that documents the new studies and findings.

Prepare regulatory agency permits on behalf of the City.

I
Providepermittingsupportto the Cityin responseto regulatoryagencycomments. i
TheCity is requestinga proposalonlyforthe Step1tasksatthistime. Uponcompletionof Step1, theCity may request a proposal for completion of the Step 2 tasks. j Assumptions
This scope of work and cost estimate is based on the following assumptions.

TheCitywill provideto Stantecall availableenvironmentalcompliancedocumentation, supporting technical studies, and mapping upon execution of this scope of work.

TheCitywill provideda comprehensiveprojectdescriptionof the updatedprojectandidentifyanyareas where the project differs from the one analyzed in the previous EIS/ EIR, as applicable.

I
I
IJv; I C; t, li l`i CrsfY? tt?! 1'• q`: ...,_..,, Ali I

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) ii
12 August 2021
Ms.Amber Kelley, EnvironmentalComplianceManager

Reference:

ProposaltoProvideEnvironmentalServicesfortheCityofRedding'sStillwaterBusinessParkPhaseIIRoadwayProject The City will contract separately with a traffic engineering firm to review available documentation and to make recommendations on any updated traffic studies.
i
Step 2 tasks are excluded from this scope of work.

Scope of Work
BasedonourexpertiseandunderstandingoftheproposedprojectandguidanceprovidedbytheCity, we propose the following scope of work.

Task 1; Preliminary Environmental Review
Upon receipt from the City, Stantec will review the 2006 EIR/EIS, supporting technical studies, associated mapping, regulatory permits, and any other pertinent documentation that are available in the City's project file. Wewill reviewcurrentplansandprojectdescriptionfor the PhaseII RoadwayProjectandcompare with the 2006 EIR/ EIS and any previously issued permits to determine if the scope of the current project falls within the scope of the original EIR/EIS. We will assess each resource topic area— except traffic, whichwill be addressedby GHDunderseparatecontractwiththe City— to verifyif substantialchanges have occurred with respect to environmental circumstances, including site conditions or regulation updates.

We will also identify any new information of substantial importance that has become available since the EIR/EISwasadopted. A Stantecbiologistwill conductan initialsitereconnaissanceof the projectstudy limitsto determineiftherehavebeensubstantivechangesto biologicalconditions(e.g., limitsof jurisdictionalwaters, newelderberryshrubs, etc.)andwill recordobservationsof anychange.

Following a comprehensive review of the available documentation and current project information and regulatory conditions, Stantec will determine if new or updated technical studies will be needed to support theenvironmentalcomplianceandpermittingeffortforthe PhaseII RoadwayProject. Thisinformationwill be compiled and summarized in a preliminary environmental review memorandum, which will be submitted to the Cityfor reviewandcomment. If necessary,wewill revisethe memorandumto incorporateCity comments and submit a final memorandum.
j Underthistask, Stantecwill alsomaintainan openlineof communicationwiththe City(as appropriate) throughoutthedurationof the project. Thiswill beaccomplishedthrougha combinationof upto two(2) one-hour conference calls, as well as informal communications( e.g., e-mails).

Deliverables: Meeting notes; emails summarizing conversations; recommendations memorandum.

Meeting( s): Attendance at up to two( 2) one- hour team calls.

Completion Schedule
Stantec will complete the tasks described herein as described in Table 1. ixtisl rr,•,. ... s nrr; u ii in+ Tnrc
i I
I
I„

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) 12 August 2021
Ms. Amber Kelley, EnvironmentalComplianceManager

Reference:

Proposalto ProvideEnvironmentalServicesfortheCityofRedding'sStillwaterBusinessParkPhase11RoadwayProject Table 1. Completion Schedule
Deliverable Completion Schedule
Task 1. Preliminary Environmental Review Beginning after receipt of fully executed contract and notice to proceed( NTP); draft recommendation memorandum to be
provided 4- 6 weeks after NTP.

Cost Estimate
The estimated cost to complete the work described in this proposal is detailed below in Table 2. Our detailed cost spreadsheet and rate schedule are attached.

Table 2. Cost Estimate
I
Tasks Cast_..__
I
I
Task 1. Preliminary Environmental Review 23, 145. 00
TOTAL 23, 145. 00
Please let us know if you have any questions or comments concerning this proposal. We look forward to i assisting the City in completing this project.

I
Regards,
Stantec Consulting Services Inc. I
I
Wirt Lanning Connie MacGregor
Principal Project Manager
Phone: 530 280- 8375 Phone: ( 530) 530- 280- 8376
Fax: ( 530) 222- 4958 Fax: ( 530) 222- 4958
wirt. lanning@stantec. com connie. macgregor@stantec. com it
I
Attachment: StillwaterBusinessParkPhase2AProjectEnvironmentalStudyLimitsMap Cost Spreadsheet and Stantec Rate Schedule
I
I
I
III

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) 1 Mfr r Ei ' lR "•. i t. ..
s
y3
ti' Xh
un"
j',`
S li: f l , •
Yg9 2
r
r`
k
a
tbiA®
I
MIS
BM
VOW
aw
O
faW
4a
1,
r'•
nC.
9A
p
0g4T:
i`
fi,
r» lsa3t- as'
rig 3
d

1.1444Y!
a
F 2

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) i
I
0 we O y
9';
Q z m II;
I I
z G Flo
D> D
n z N
0 mcn
1 z mx n off
y
ia1d_
3 O
o
p
n
z
N
n m
r I m 5 n
M o0
D y O am a
N
N D A
c m
9 ul
ml..
077C r c r '"
z
a
N
A n
y i a
a
w
y < v° O o°r-
Mm o I
N
mCA
ti tiA H
y r " " y a op Ulm
o w_ pla'
U
I
n
o
C
Z
I
Z I I
mQ
O W
H y
i ( 0 3
oloo olo
I
z z I 0
n
o
y
N
H
alal' o'' b' oOplolo ' b' p olo o
I
pip
S I I
I
r I
m
II
H N
l o
I to pyoIn
I
i I c
0 I mt
I I
of N
y y
OIo oIo
I i
a
I

I -
n
0 w 0
i
I
m
Z
y I
0 II
0 n y
ti
u
0 71
I I
I81
G
Slaioo
a
p' o
00 T
A
r
W
DO
c' c
n
0 0
a
lom
O D
u
r
0p'
m-
A
I

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) i
Table 4-1. Schedule of Hourly Labor Rates

CITY OF REDDING
2020 MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Stant@C
Charges for all professional, technical, and administrative staff directly charging time to the project will be calculated and billed on the basis of the followinq schedule. u.
civ' +' .•
4 r''
J#
3 92
Junior Level Position
Works under the supervision of a senior professional
4 103
Independently carries out assignmentsof limited scope using standard procedures, methods5 111 and techniques j Assists senior staff in carrying out more advanced procedures Completed work is reviewed for feasibility and soundness of judgment j Graduate from an appropriate post- secondary program or equivalent Generally, less than four ears' experience
Fully Qualified Professional Position
6 1 15 .

Carries out assignments requiring general familiarity within a broad field of the respective 122 profession
8 127 •
Makes decisions by using a combination of standard methods and techniques Actively participates in planning to ensure the achievement of objectives Works independently to interpret information and resolve difficulties Graduate from an appropriate post- secondary program, with credentials or equivalent Generally, three to six ears' experience
First Level Supervisor or First Complete Level of Specialization j
9 137 •
Providesappliedprofessionalknowledgeand initiativeinplanningand coordinatingwork10 $ 143 programs 1 1 154 .

Adapts established guidelines as necessary to address unusual issues Decisionsaccepted as technically accurate, however may on occasion be reviewed for soundness of judgment
Graduate from an appropriate post- secondary program, with credentials or equivalent Generally, five to nine ears' experience
Highly Specialized Technical Professional or Supervisor of Groups of Professionals 3 $
158 .

Provides multi- discipline knowledge to deliver innovative solutions in related field of expertise167 • Participates in short and long range planning to ensure the achievement of objectives14 $ 173 • Makes responsible decisions on all matters, including policy recommendations, work methods, and financial controls associated with large expenditures Reviews and evaluates technical work
Graduate from an appropriate post- secondary program, with credentials or equivalent Generally, ten to fifteen ears' experience with extensive, broad experience Senior Level Consultant or Management
15 $ 191
Recognized as an authority in a specific field with qualifications of significant value 16 $ 219
Provides multidiscipline knowledge to deliver innovative solutions in related field of expertise17 $ 229 Independently conceives programs and problems for investigation Participates in discussions to ensure the achievement of program and/ or project objectives Makes responsible decisions on expenditures, including large sums or implementation of major programs and/ or projects
Graduate from an appropriate post- secondary program, with credentials or equivalent Generally, more than twelve ears' experience with extensive experience 18 $ 234 Senior Level Management Under Review by Vice President or Higher 19 $ 242 •
Recognized as an authority in a specific field with qualifications of significant value 20 $ 253 •
Responsible for long range planning within a specific area of practice or region Makes decisions which are for reaching and limited only by objectives and policies of the21 263 organization
Plans/ approves projects requiring significant human resources or capital investment Graduate from an appropriate post- secondary program, with credentials or equivalent Generally, fifteen year' s experience with extensive professional and management experience
ExpertWitnessServicescarrya 50%premiumonlabor. Overtimewillbe chargedat 1.5 timesthestandardbillingrote. Alllaborrateswill be subject to annual increase.

Note: We propose a 3. 5% annual increase.

I
City of Redding!/ Statement of Qualifications On- Call Professional Engineeringand Architectural Related Services 13 I„

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) II
II
Table 4-2. Other Direct Casts

CITY OF REDDING
2020 MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
S$ dI"TtOC
I
Other Direct Disbursements:

Vehicle Mileage
Prevailing
IRS Rate
Subcontract Services Actual Cost+ 10%
Travel/ Per Diem Actual Cost+ 10%
Capital Purchases and Expendable Materials Actual Cost+ 10%n III Postage and Shipping Actual Cost+ 10%
Standard Field Equipment fSP.e Attached Schedule
Standard Field Equipment:

Air Sampling Equipment 75/ do
Bailer- Disposable 10/ each
Bailer- Disposable wet hted 20/ each
Bailer- Quick E- Bailer System 95/ day
Bailer- Reusable 25/ da
Drum- 55 Gallons 75/ each
Digital Camera 30/ do
Drae er Sampler tubes not included 35/ da
Field Communication- Two- Way Radio 25/ da
Field Computer 60/ da
FieldTestKit- Groundwater60/ each
Field Test Kit- Soil 60/ each
Field Test Kit- SVE 60/ each
Field Vehicle- Mileage Prevailing IRS rate
Field Vehicle 150/ da
Field Vehicle- Sampling Truck 305/ day
Field Vehicle- Truck/ Van 175/ day
Flame Ionization Detector FID 160/ da
Generator 80/ da
Gloves- Colored Cloth 5/ air
Gloves- Colored Leather 20/ air
Gloves- Colored Nitrile0. 30/ air
Gloves- Kevlar Under Glove 10/ air
H& S- Level B Safety Equipment 205/ da
H& S- Level C Safety Equipment 105/ da
H& S- Level D Safety Equipment 65/ da
H& S- Traffic Control Equipment 75/ da
Hand Auger 35/ da
Low Flow Purge/ Sampling System 95/ da
Meter- Oil/ Water Interface 65/ da
Meter- Anemometer 30/ da
Meter- CO 75/ da
Meter- Data Logger 155/ da
Meter- Dissolved Oxygen 75/ da
Meter- DO/ ORP/ Temp/ Conductivity Y.

Meter- Dosimeter 50/ da
Meter- Ferrous Iron 10/ da
Meter- Flow 35/ da
Meter- H2S Detector 90/ da
Meter- LEL/ 02 90/ da
Meter- Ma nehelic( Gouge) 40/ da
I
14 Stantec
P.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services)

CITY OF REDDING
2020 MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
StaC' 6tOC
Standard Field Equipment( continued):

Meter- Magnetometer 55/ da
Meter- Manometer 30/ da
Meter- Measurin Wheel 10/ da
Meter- Metal Detector 50/ da
Meter- Multimeter 120/ da
Meter- 02/ CO2 120/ da
Meter- ORP
30/ day
Meter- Other
quote/ day
Meter- Ozone 30/ da
Meter- pH/ Temp/Conductivity 35/ da
Meter- Turbidity 80/ da
Meter- Dust Monitor 130/ da
Meter- Velocity 30/ da
Meter- Water Level Indicator 40/ da
Photoionization Detector PID 120/ da
Pressure Washer SOJda
Pum - Air Sampling 50/ da
Pum - Centrifu al 55/ da
Pum - Groundwater Sampling. 120/ da
Pum - Peristaltic
55/ d2
Pum - Trash
40/ day
Pum - WellSam-Piing30/ da
Pum - Well Sam lin / Puree 50/ da
Reproduction- 11x17 Color Plot/ Print/ Co 2/ co py
Reproduction- 2436 Color Plot/ Print 10/ co py
Reproduction- 8. 5x1 1 B& W Copies 0. 15/ co py
Reproduction- 8. 5x1 1 Color Copies 1.25/ co py
Reproduction- Oversized B& W Plot/ Print 11/ copy
Reproduction- Oversized Color Plot/ Print 15lco py
Soil Sample Rin / Sleeve 11/ each
Survey Equipment- Laser Plane Level& Receiver 220/ da
Transducer 35/ each
Tedlar Ba 20/ each
NOTE: Other equipment needs will be priced on a per project basis. j I
I
II
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
City of Redding(/ statement of Qualifications On- Call Professional Engineeringand Architectural Related Services 15 I
I

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5215 ( Job No. 2669) Stillwater Business Park Phase 1C Street Lighting Project:
1) Award to Eddie Axner Construction in the amount of $85,224; 2) Approve an additional $ 31,000 to cover the cost of construction administration and inspection fees; and $20,000 for project development costs; 3) Approve $ 10,000 to provide construction contingency funding; 4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $ 10,000; and 5) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 4thAmendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2021- 078 appropriating $ 150,000 for said purpose.

Fiscal Impact
The Stillwater Business Park Phase 1C Street Lighting Project is being funded by the General Fund. On February 10, 2021, the City Council ( Council) approved and budgeted funds for project development including but not limited to environmental and preliminary engineering services. The attached budget resolution for $ 150,000 will cover the remaining costs of construction including contract administration, inspections, and contingencies for this project.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $ 20,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $ 95,224
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $ 31,000
Additional City Manager Authority $ 10,000
Total Project Costs $ 156, 224
MEETING DATE: August 3, 2021
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:

APPROVED BY***
caukland@ci. redding. ca.us btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Award Bid ScheduleNo. 5215, Stillwater BusinessPark Phase1C Street Lighting Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) Report to Redding City Council July 23, 2021
Re: 4.11(c)--Stillwater BusinessPark Phase1C Street Lighing Project Page 2 Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose to not award the bid for the Stillwater Business Park Phase1C Street Lighting Project and provide staff with alternative direction. Without this project, there will be no streetlighting from the entranceof the BusinessPark to the northerly bridge.

Background/ Analysis
Attached is a tabulation of bids received and openedon July 15, 2021, for the Stillwater Business Park Phase 1C Street Lighting Project. The low bid in the amount of $ 85,224 was received from Axner Construction Company of Redding, California. The engineer's estimate was $ 74,685.

Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $20,000. Project development costsinclude engineering, surveying, right- of-way, environmental, and consultant services.

The project includes street lighting of Venture Parkway at the Stillwater Business Park entrance from Old Oregon Trail to the east side of the northerly Stillwater Creek Bridge. This project will install sevenstreetlights and all the componentsassociatedwith street lighting to include but not limited to street lights, foundations, trenching, conduits, and conductors.

A Final Environmental Impact Report ( FEIR) for the Stillwater Business Park was certified on April 18, 2006. The FEIR has been reviewed and considered in connection with this project.

Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines Section 15168 it was determined that all effects were examined in the previously approved FEIR, and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report would be required.

Council Priority/ City Manager Goals
Public Safety – “ Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Economic Development – “ Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businessesand attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Resolution
Bid Tabulation
Location Map
Notice of Determination ( available online)
Previous Staff Report 02-10-21 (available online)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) IIIIllllllli n,mH „„
y q ' CITY OF REDDING
w °'
µ
m ' REPORTTO THE CITY
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November16, 2021 FROM: Chuck Aukland, Public ITEM NO. 4. 11( g) Works
Director APPROVED
BY***
d
mf A fIf311C,. L1 1 C7fl CS}IT" CC . j`
Q7]. tYW..u Gqi, wi, n, v> aw,ar ce. wf;i nl5tierrgru'nt' hsri c s77ir ctl¢ ir 11113refY2 [email protected]. us btippin@cityofredding. org SUBJECT: 4. 11( g)-- Stillwater BusinessPark Phase2 Infrastructure Improvement Project
RecommendationAuthorizestaffto developa Requestfor Proposalfor the designof infrastructure improvementsfor the Stillwater BusinessPark Phase2 Project; and adopt Resolution approvingand adoptingthe 19' Amendmentto City of Redding Budget ResolutionNo. 2021-078 appropriating1, 500, 000 for said
purpose. Fiscal
ImpactThe StillwaterBusinessPark Phase2 Projectis being fundedby the GeneralFund. The attachedbudget resolutionin the amountof $1, 500,000 will fund ongoingproject developmentcosts for this projectto ensure delivery timelinesfor prospectivetenants. The GeneralFundhas previous propertysalesto cover $650,000of the projectedcost, whilethe remainingamountis expected to be realized throughnear term propertysales. The fundingsourceof the constructionof the necessary improvementshasnot yet been
determined. Alternative
ActionThe City Council ( Council) may chooseto not authorizefundingfor the designof Stillwater BusinessPark Phase2 Projectand providestaff with alternative direction. Withoutthis project,the Cityof Redding (City) will not fulfillits obligationof providinga completedbusinesspark to its tenants. As developer, the Cityis responsiblefor providing adequate roadways, utilities, and various other infrastructure improvementsto ensurethe businessparkis useablefor current and future

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) Report to Redding City Council November 12, 2021
Re: 4. 11( g)-- Stillwater Business Park Phase 2 Infrastructure Improvement Project Page 2 Background/ Analysis
The City is responsible for infrastructure improvements at Stillwater Business Park, including street lights, paving, landscaping, and utility installation. At the mid-year budget review in February 2021, the Council approved an allocation of $ 500, 000 out of the proceeds from land sales to fund the design of the infrastructure improvements at the Park.

In August 2021, the Council approved the appropriation of$ 150, 000 for the construction bid for Phase1C of this project that included the installation of streetlighting on Venture Parkway from the Stillwater Business Park entrance at Old Oregon Trail through the east side of the northerly Stillwater Creek Bridge.

To continue the necessary road extension and utility work, staff is recommending an increase in project budget funds from the General Fund Capital Project Fund in the amount of $ 1, 500, 000.

This additional allocation is needed for staff and consultant costs related to project development including but not limited to surveys, design, environmental clearance, and right of way acquisitions with appraisals for the remainder of the improvements. The design work will include road construction, wet and dry utility installation, storm drains, street lights and other miscellaneous items to complete improvements to Venture Parkway from Rancho Road through the south end of the park to Fig Tree Lane concluding at the intersection of Fig Tree Lane and Airport Road. The work will include widening projects along Rancho Road and Fig Tree Lane and intersection improvements that may include Rancho Road/Airport Road and also Fig Tree Lane/ Airport Road.

With the sale of additional lots, the improvements which were halted need to resume in order to adhere to what was intended with the development of the park This additional allocation will be funded with property sales receipts. Property sales in this fiscal year are in excess of$ 900, 000, and it is anticipated that this fiscal year will see an additional $ 3 million in proceeds from additional land transactions. Additional work on the park will be budgeted for completion in the coming months.

Council Priority/ City Manager Goals
Public Safety — " Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safewhere they live, work, and play in the City of Redding." Economic Development — " Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community."
Attachments
Resolution
Vicinity Map Exhibit 1
Previous Staff Reports - 08- 03- 21 and 02- 16- 21 ( available online)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) RESOLUTION NO. 2021-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 19TH
AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 078
APPROPRIATING $ 1, 500, 000 FOR STILLWATER BUSINESS PARK PHASE TWO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021- 22

BE IT RESOL VED B Y THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be andis hereby amendedasfollows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION 1NCREASE DECREASE
178 437 General Fund Capital Projects 1, 500, 000
THAT accounttitles and numbersrequiring adjustmentsby this Resolution areasfollows:

USE SOURCE

OF FLINDS OF FLINDS
Decrease(Increase)Beginning Balance
111- 427- 01- 0001- 01 General Fund Beginning Balance 850, 000 178- 437- 01- 0001- 01 General Fund Capital Projects Beg Balance 650, 000 Increase( Decrease) Revenue
111- 427- 5- 5040- 01 Fund Transfer To Capital Project 850, 000) 178- 437- 5- 5041- 01 Fund Transfer from General Fund 850, 000 Increase Expenditures
178- 437- 4588- 02 Stillwater Completion 1,500, 000
Total $ 1,500, 000 $ 1,500, 000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $ 1, 500, 000 for Stillwater Business Park phase two infrastructure improvement project for fiscal year 2021- 22.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 16' day of November, 2021, andwas duly adoptedat said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ERIN D. RESNER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) 9 n i
i
i
c NTS
o
RANCHO
I
ROAD :

Z
i;
II
D- i y , iI--.
i j
r i_
G
i f

TILL ATER

BUS NESS ARK
y
I J

INF TURE

I R OVEMENTS I ''
i - r I
I
I i
i I
7 F-
lo
I
T I
i-'
i '
iI
i
I
i il j
j f I

J C VI REDDING
f , t MUNICIPAL
tir A RPORT I
iy I
R A,
IIi i'
a e i i
u
d
S I
00;
i
I
TIL W 1TER

US PIFSS PARK
i ; I IF S RUCTURE

P EMENTS
i E I
I I
i

PROJECT VICINTY MAP
NOVEMBER/ 2021

CITY OF REDDING
oF RE°
o
2 ti c

PUBLIC WORKS
oQ ' , ATTAC H M E NT 1DEPARTMENT L/ ppQ
1 of 1

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) titi„
w
iii i CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCILu
MEETING DATE: August 3, 2021 FROM: Chuck Aukland, Public ITEM NO. 4. 11( c) Works Director
APPROVED BY***
e
im"""
a ru.
w+'
4 ; a" W
1kl ta7d,` umli VVcark i c J 3f2EY? 1 n-y ipp n, C a n 71? f/ Z Y?1 caulcland@ci. redding. ca. us ' btippin@cityofredding. org SUBJECT: 4. 11( c)=- Award Bid Schedu[ le No. 5215, Stillwater Business Park Phase 1C Street Lighting Project
Recommendation
A uthorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5215 ( Job No. 2669) Stillwater Business Park Phase 1C Street Lighting Project:
1) Award to Eddie Axner Construction in the amoun c f$ 85, 224; 2) Approve an additional $ 31, 0 0 fio over th cost c f construction administration and inspection fees; and $ 20, 000 for project deuelopment costs; 3) Approve $ 10,000 to provide construction contingency funding; 4) A uthorize the City Manager to appr u additional increases in either the construction managementor constructioncontingencyamountsupt4 atotal of$ 10,000; and 5) Adopt Resolutionapprovingandadoptingthe4thAmendmentto City of ReddingBudget Resolution No. 2021- 078 appropriating $ 150, 000 for said purpose.

Fiscal Impact
The Stillwater Business Park Phase 1C Street Lighting T'roject is being funded by the General Fund. On February 10, 2021, the City Council ( Council) approved and budgeted funds for project development including but not limited to environmental and prelimina ry engineering services. The attached budget resol ution for $ 150,000 will cover the remaining costs of construction including contract administration, inspections, and contingencies for this project.

Cost Summa
Item Estimated
Pro' ect Develo ment Costs 20, 000
Construction Contract+ Contin enc 95, 224
Contract Administration, Ins ection, Testin 31, 000
Additional Cit 1Vlana er Authorit 10, 000
Total Pro' ect Costs 156, 224

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) Report to Redding City Council July 23, 2021
Re: 4. 11( c)-- Stillwater Business Park Phase 1 C Street Lighing Project Page 2 Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessaryto balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose to not award the bid for the Stillwater Business Park Phase 1C Street Lighting Project and provide staff with alternative direction. Without this project, there will be no street lighting from the entrance of the Business Park to the northerly bridge.

Background/ Analysis
Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on July 15, 2021, for the Stillwater Business Park Phase1C Street Li hting Project. The low bid in the amount of$ 85,224 was received from Axner Construction Company of Redding, California. The engineer' s estimate was $ 74, 685.

Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $ 20, 000. Project development costs incl ude engineering, surveying, right- of- way, environmental, and consultant services.

The project includes street lightin of Venture Parkway at the Stillwater Business Park entrance from Old Oregon Trail to th; eastside of the no'therly Stillwater Creek Bridge. This project will install seven street lights and al1 the components associated with street lighting to incl ude but not limited to streetlights, foundations, trenching, conduits, and conductors.

A Final Environmental Impact Report ( FEIR) for the Still ater Business Park was certified on April 18, 2006. The FEIR has been reui wed and considered in connection with this project.

Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act( CEQA) Guidelines Section 15168 it was determinedthat all effecs were examinedin the previously approvedFEIR, and pursuantto CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subseguent Environtnental Inr, pact Report would be re9uired.

Council Priority/ City Manager Goals
Public Safety — " Work to improve a11aspectsof public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the ity of Redding." Economic Development — " Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to createjobs, retain current businessesand attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community."
Attachments
Resolution
Bid Tabulation
Location Map
Notice of Determination ( available online)
Previous Staff Report 02- 10- 21 ( available online)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) RESOLUTION NO. 2021-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 4Tx AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 078 APPROPRIATING 150, 000 FOR COMPLETION OF PHASE 1C STREET LIGHTING PROJECT AT STILLWATER BUSINESS PARK FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021- 22

BE IT RESOL TED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amendedasfollows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
178 437 Capital Projects— General Fund 150, 000
THAT accounttitles and numbers requiring adjustmentsby this Resolution areasfollows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease( Increase) Beginning Balance
178- 437- 1- 0001- 01 Beginning Balance 150, 000
Increase Expenditures
178- 437- 4588- 02 Stillwater Completion 2021 150, 000
Total $ 150, 000 $ 150, 000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $ 150,000 for cornpletio a of phase 1C street lighting project at Stillwater Business Park for fiscai year 2021- 22.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 3rd day of August, 2021, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEIVIBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEIVIBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ERIN D. RESNER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o
J
W Q O O O N l O O
F O O 6> f- ln d' N
s- E- } EH N EH N
d
C
d
O O O O O O ( fl O O
V o 0 o ci o 0
y
Z O N ln EF} EH f I
y ( j r Ln CO
o a
L
U
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J O O O O O O . f) O O J O O O O O O O O O O
Q o o ch o r n o o d- Q o o 0 0 0 00 0 o c
OO N o0 N I O Ln I- N M CO O N d O o0
N d' d' 00 N 00 GO t, 1 0 N CD 00 CD N Cfl
F Ef} E! 3 Ef} M Ef} E! 3 Ef} N Ef} F Ef} Ef} Ef} Ef} Ef} E} Ef} .

N-
d

O O O O O O O O W O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O N O O tA O O O Q f O O O O
0 W O O O M O ct' O O G1 F W O O O O O O 00 O O
L V o o . n rr co c o o c V o . n o co oc c c o 0
Z O N EH Ef} EfT ln O Z ln N M Efl f 3 4fl ln
N d' d' j N I Ln
J a EH cfJ EH EH EH d ER EH EH f} EH
C w

O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C Q Ct: O O O
O J O O O ln O d- O O d' J Q O O O O lC? LC? O O O
Q o c n o r n r n o c Q o o . n r o rn rn o o
C> - O N Cfl M CO f N N - . t) N f O d ln W O 00 N N N ln N CO C>
i'
O CO I`+ O d' CO N I fi 0
y
F EH EF} M EF} b4 ER 64 Ef! d4 N 64 64 M EH O W
O U'
Vo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0
o 0 0 0 0 o rn o o ag 00000 ncv o 0
W O C> O O f> N O O C Q O' O I- N d- M O O
C H O d' d' CO EH O F C3 d' (' 6 E!-} O O
Q Z V O d- co EF} p Z V 4c) d- I tf} t d- d
EH
a c d
Y'
Fn
a O
w
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J O O O O C3` O O O tC J O O O O O O O O O O
W Q o n c . n m o o ca ,,,; Q o 0 0 0 o cv ao 0 0 0 F O f ln r c- Cfl M ln f.D D N F lC) O f M CO M Y Ln O Y 0 N N N = e- N O d' = O ln •- d' M .- CO N O CO F Ef} ER Ef}' K3 .- M T- f O F Ef} E!? E!? N E!? E!? .- M a
c c c t V c c c c c
g W
z
o 0 0 0 o c o o ca ' o000000 0 0
1= o 0 0 0 0 00 : o o tL o000000 0 0
W W O O O lf> i. ci lf> ti? O O F W O O O O o0 CV 00 O O 7 W C) O lf) Ef} „ Q' O C) O O O c'") ct •- Ef} O O J z Z O i.f) ln ER E! 3 ER M M Z Lf O f 64 E! 3 E! 3 L[) O c (
j CO ln G> > Cfl ln
a Q a
w z o
w w
N lf) N
U
Q
c Q Q ti ti ti ti Q Q c Q Q tL ti ti ti Q Qz J W W - - - - W W z J W W - - - - W W y y
Ca
W W
F H
a U z U
o
co Q
v d " F I— F d d I— HW Z W W : _ ° tS 2 ° tS Z Z — W W _ _ ° 2 Z
N N OJ X X `
O O

J W C W O
JXX '
0 0 c

W C W O
o o m m ~ o ¢ W o ¢
a
m m o Q W o Q '
j Z N C) ~ J J W Z Z
Q
Z Z

Q V W F J J W Z Z Z Z
QJ W .
a
1l') V Z J J Z Z Z Z Q Q I V ~ Z J J Z Z Z Z Q Q I p W O O O O OI- j j O W Q> O 0000 I- j O m m t U d U U U U ( n J m J U a. d U U U U ( n .. J m J H W .- N M d' CO f 00 N M ct ( fl f 00 6>
F
m f

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) i J
i i I
i I
I j I.

I 1 ' J
i I a i
R ANC 0 0
NTS -
p
I C
i
j , G i
fl

PROJECT
y
G
L
o SITE
A
o y
3 v 4
5 i
I s
s l
o
a
O i
i 9 i
I
i
O i j
J
i
il
a
1 i
j o
j
I i
i
Ii
I—~
r
c
r .,
r±
I ' , i
j
1 I ; i I
i I
C "-, i I
i i EDDINGii Nl lPM C AL
y PORT
o I\/ i\
JULY/ 2021
CITY OF REDDING o
R
p STILLWATER BUSINESS PARK PHASE
c 1C STREET LIGHTING PROJECT
PUBLIC WORKS f '
DEPARTMENT c, Foa
P

LOCATION MAP

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) rmPrint Fo
Notice of Determination Appendix D
To: From:

Office of Planning and Research Public Agency: City of Redding U. S. Mail: StreetAddress: Address: 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, CA 960P. O. Box 3044 1400 Tenth St., Rm 113
Sacramento, CA 95812- 3044 Sacramento, CA 95814
ontact: Amber Kelley
Phone: ( 530) 225- 4046
County Clerk
County of: Shasta County Lead Agency( if different from above):

Address: 1643 Market Street
Redding, CA 96001 Address:

Contact:

Phone:

SUBJECT: Filing of No#ice af Determination in campliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.

State Clearinghouse N'umber ( if submitted# caState Clearinghouse): 2001032106 Project Title: Stillwater Business Park Phase 1C Street Lighting Project ProjectApplicant: City of Reddinq
ProjectLocation (include county): Fiedding, Galifnrnia- Shasta County Project Description:

Install new streetlightsalong the south side of VentureParkwaybeginningat the intersectionaf Old OregonTrail and extendingeast to#he Phase 1 Briclge. Constructionwill involveminor earthwork, trenching, and the installation of concrete foundatic ns, conduit, transformers, pull boxes, and lights.

This is to advise that the City of Redding has approved the abave Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
described projec# on April 18, 2006 and has madethe fa#lowing determinationsregardingthe above date)
described project.

1. The praject[ will will not) have a significant effect on the environment.

2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this prt ject pursu nt to the provisions of CEQA.

A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant fiothe provisions of CEQA.

3. Mitigation measures [ were were not] made a condition of the approval of the project.

4. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan [ was was not] adopted for this project.

5. A statement of Overriding Considerations [ was was not] adopted for this project.

6. Findings [ were were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval, or the negative Declaration, is available to the General Public at:

City of Redding, PublicWorks Department, 777 CypressAvenue Redding, CA 96001 Signature ( Public Agency): Title: Env. Compliance Manager Date: uly 20, 2021 Date Received for filing at OPR:

Authority cited: Sections 21083, Public Resources Code.

Reference Section 21 000- 21 1 74, Public Resources Code. Revised 2Q11

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) titi„
w
iii i CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCILu
MEETING DATE: February 16, 2021 FROM: Allyn Feci Clark, Director of ITEM NO. 9. 10( a)
Finance/ City Treasurer
APPROVED BY***
e ,»..""
Md . . 4. ;
I i ec C1t rk, iec[ vr s[ '" u 74ul Li; y T' r:... tr r ', 2r`tS 2021 d"` Il"y IppSli," fl lri Y C aclark@cityofredding. org btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 9. 10 a)-- Consider City of Redding Mid- Year Budget Review for Fiscal Year 2020-21; andResolutionapprovingMid- earBudgetAdjustments.

Recommendation
Accept the Fiscal Year 2020- 21 Mid- Year Budget Report ( Report); and adopt Resoiution approvingandadoptingthe 75hArnendmentto City BudgetResolution2019-050 to adjustthe budget in accordance with the Report.

Fiscallmpact
The recommended changes to he General Fund will meet the City Council directive to maintain a ten percent reserve in the General Fu d. The other recommended changes wi11 not reduce reserve levels below those required in the respective funds.

Alternative Action
The City Council ( Council) could choose to reject the report and request additional or different information.

Background/ Analysis
The City of Redding ( City) has expended$ 47, 481, 893 from the General Fund through December 31, 2020. This level of expenditure represents 47. 2 percent of total appropriations, and is 3, 450, 264 or 6. 8 percent below staff' s cash flow estimate of$ 50, 932, 156 through December 31, 2020.

General Fund revenue as of December 31, 2020, totals $ 35, 311, 003 which is $ 1, 518, 782 or 4. 4 percent above staff' s cash flow projection. Staff is recommending an adjustment of$ 900, 000 to Cannabis Tax revenues for a total of$ 1. 6 million. The original budget projection was $ 250, 000 for Fiscal Year 2020- 21 and was adjusted as part of the last mid- year Report to $' 700, 000. The original budget and subsequent adjustment were based on limited information due o the lack of historical information relative to the tax. This adjustment is sti11 based on the same limited

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) Report to Redding Ciry Council February 10, 2021
Re: 9. 10( a)-- City of Redding Mid- Year Budget Review and Adjustments Page 2 information but is estimated based on the results of the first six months of the fiscal year when Cannabis Tax received was $ 977, 228.

Below is a summary of the recommended General Fund changes to appropriations:

Increase ( Decrease) in Appropriations - General Fund: FYE 2021 Police - Other Contracts 12, 000
Police - Vehicle 20, 000
Fire- Special Eq uipment 20, 010
Animal Control- Contract 19, 000
Code Enforcement- Vehicle 30, 000
Parks - Security Conti- acts 8, 000
Total increase ( decrease) in General Fund appropriafions 109, 010 In addition to this change,staff is recornmending an increaseto expendituresin the General Fund Capital Project Fund, The General Fund Capital Projects Fund is requesting $ 500, 000. The City of Redding is responsible for infrastrucxureimprovements at Stillwater Business Park, including street lights, paving,; landscaping, and utility installation. With the sale of additional lots, the improvements which vere halted need to resume in order to adhere to what was intended with the development of th park, The $ SOO,QQO would be allocated to fund the full design of the remainingimprovementto he park. This allocationwi11be fundedby moneyreceivedfrom propertysalesthis fiscal year. Prop rty salesin this.fiscal yeararein excessof$ 700, 000sofar.

Additional work on the park will be budgeted for cptnpletion upon the sale of additional parcels.

GeneraZ Fund Rese^ ves
Due to the completion of the annual audit, staff is recommending a changeto the cashbalance as of July 1, 2020. Staff is recommending an increas of$ 5.9 million for a total of$ 16.5 million for the beginning cash for Fiscal Year 2020-21. As a result the current projected ending cash in Fiscal Year 2020- 21 is $ 15. 1 million or 17. 7 percent, , Through December 31, 2020, the General Fund Cash Balance was$ 5,385,406, or equal to a 6.4 percent reserve.

General Fund Overtime
The City of Reddin General Fund overtime expense totals $ 3, 968, 885 through December 31, 2020. This is $ 2, 165, 570 above staff' s cash flow estimate of$ 1, 803, 315.

The expenditures year to date compared to year to date budget are listed below, of which, the four largest overtime budgets are Fire, Police, Parks, and Streets:

The Fire Department had overtime expenses through December 31, 2020 of$ 2, 926, 817 compared to a total overtime budget of$ 1, 031, 215;
The Police Department had overtime expenses through December 31, 2020 of$ 955, 943 compared to a total overtime budget of$' 729, 250;
The Parks division had overtime expenses through December 31, 2020 of $ 33, 51' 7 compared to a total overtime budget of$ 2, 500.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services) Report to Redding Ciry Council February 10, 2021
Re: 9. 10( a)-- City of Redding Mid- Year Budget Review and Adjustments Page 3 The Streets division had overtime expenses through December 31, 2020 of $ 34, 218 compared to a total overtime budget of$ 30, 000; and
All other General Fund Departments had overtime expenses through December 31, 2020 of$ 18, 390 compared to an overtime budget of$ 10, 350.

Although some of the aforementioned expenses are over budget or nearly over budget, there are no additional budget requests at this time. Each department has adequate savings in areas such as personnel charges and additional cross charges to other City departments, to offset the excess cost.

Other Funds
The attachedreport recommendsthe following changesto other (enterprise and internal service) City funds. Below is a listing of th„ request (all requests comply with the City Council reserve requirements):

Increase ( Decrease) in Appropriations - Enterprise Funds: FYE 2021 Electric - Various ( see report) 3, 023, 500
Total increase ( decrease) in Enterprise Funds appropriations $ 3, 023, 500 Increase ( Decrease) in Appropriations - In ernal Service Funds: FYE 2021.

Building Maintenance - Specialized Services 5, 000
Information Tecl nology- Va ious ( see report) 7, 000 Totai increase ( decrease) in Internal Service Fund appropriations 92, 000 Council Prio ity/ City Manager Goals
Budget and Financial Management— " Achieve balanced and stable Ten Year Financial Plans for all funds."
Communication and Transparency- " IrnprQe the quality of communicationwith the public andCity employeesto enhanceknowledgeandincreasetransparencyto improve public trust."
Attachments
Resolution
Mid Year Budget Update incl uding charts and graphs for FY 20- 21

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-18-2023 (4.11(c)--Approve the Fifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the Public Works Director to request a change of scope from CalRecycle for the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation project (Project), eliminating the originally proposed biogas pipeli ne injection station and constructing renewable energy generators at the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant; (2) Direct staff to solicit request for proposals to select and pre -purchase equipment to construct this project; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager or designee to approve and sign all pre-purchased equipment agreements and contracts, not to exceed the previously authorized budget.

Fiscal Impact

This Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project (Project) has been funded by a $10 million CalRecycle Co-Digestion Grant with $2 .6 million from City of Redding (City) Wastewater Utility Funds for a total project estimate of $12.6 million. These funds were previously authorized and budgeted.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choos e not to authorize this change of scope and provide an alternative direction to staff.

MEETING DATE: December 3, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 303
Report to Redding City Council November 26, 2024
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation ProjectPage 2

Background/Analysis

On February 6, 2024, Council authorized the acceptance of a $10,000,000 CalRecycle grant for the design and construction of the project, a food waste receiving and biogas production facility at the City’s Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.

As part of the project, a gas pipeline injection station is required to inject conditioned methane gas into a Pacific Gas & Electric ( PG&E) pipeline. The station would be designed and operated by PG&E. There are a series of six separate agreements from PG&E required for interconnection. These agreements include an Interconnection Screening Study with Confidentiality Agreement, Preliminary Engineering St udy, Detailed Engineering Study, Balancing Agreement, Takeaway Agreements, and the Standard Renewable Gas Interconnection Agreement. During the course of the contracts review, staff , including the City Attorney , reviewed the PG&E required agreements and co ncluded that they were not in the best interest of the City and have recommended not to execute the agreements, therefore, not to construct the biogas pipeline injection station.

Staff has explored alternatives that meet the project and grant deliverables and have found that the same goal of the grant can be met with the installation of on -site biogas generators. This alternative will provide renewable energy by harnessing the biogas from the anaerobic digestion process and producing electricity, which cou ld be connected directly to the Redding Electric Utility grid without involving any outside agency or contracts that could be unfavorable to the City.

Staff is requesting that Council authorize the Public Works Director to request a change of scope with C alRecycle to construct an alternative to the initially proposed project, achieving the intended scope, meeting the required timelines and funding projections.

Environmental Review

This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no action is required at this time. As the grant funded project moves forward the technical environmental studies will be conducted to support a CEQA compliance document.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 304

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Accept grant funding in the amount of $10,000,000 from CalRecycle for the design and construction of the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation project, a food waste receiving and biogas production facility at the City of Redding (City) Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant;
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 26th Amendment to Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $10,000,000 in state grant funds and $2,600,000 in City Wastewater Department funds for the project; and
(3) Authorize the Public Works Director to sign the required documents with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the design and construction of a biogas Pipeline Injection Station.

Fiscal Impact

The Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation ( RODEO) project's total cost is estimated to be $12,600,000 and will be funded by CalRecycle CoDigestion grant funding and the City of Redding’s (City) Wastewater Utility fund . The CalRecycle grant will provide $10,000,000 towards the project while Wastewater Utility provides $2, 600,000 from their reserve cash balance. Though funding for the construction of this facility was not previously budgeted, the Wastewater Utility has adequate reserve funding to cover costs exceeding the amount provided by grant funding.

Alternative Action

The City Council may decline to accept this grant funding. By doing so, this project will not be constructed and CalRecycle may allocate these funds to a nother agency. The Solid Waste Utility will continue to find alternatives for disposing of food waste and other organics, as required by California Senate Bill 1383 and other legislative requirements, mandating the diversion of organics from landfills.

MEETING DATE: February 6, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(h)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(h)--Accept CalRecycle grant funding for the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project and adopt a Budget Resolution.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project) Report to Redding City Council January 31, 2024
Re: 4.11(h)--Accept CalRecycle Grant Funding for the (RODEO) and adopt Budget Reso Page 2

Background/Analysis

Recent State legislative changes regarding greenhouse gas emissions and the disposal of organic waste (California Senate Bill (SB) 1383, California Assembly Bill (AB) 32, AB 1826, AB 876, AB 341, and AB 1594) mandate that landfills no longer accept organic wastes. SB 1383 codified California's commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution statewide .

Methane gas emissions from landfills are being targeted to reduce California’s Greenhouse Gas emissions. Currently, staff has secured the capacity for disposal of source-separated organic food waste material at the closest commercial organics processing facility in Oroville, CA. This material is planned to be trucked to the facility by City Solid Waste staff and processed at a current rate of $84/ton increasing to $95/ton in 2025 with an estimated annual cost of $ 74,000.

This cost doesn’t include staff or trucking costs. This ongoing cost will continue to increase annually as capacity becomes less available. As a result, staff has identified the RODEO project that leverages existing City infrastructure and will eliminate the need for Solid Waste to transport organics out of the area and reduce its processing fees.

The RODEO project would construct a food waste receiving statio n at the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to accept organics into the existing anaerobic digestion process and biogas conditioning system to produce methane gas which will be sold to Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) via a Pipeline Injection Station. This Project helps meet the requirements of SB 1383 by diverting food waste from landfills, and will also produce methane gas, which will be captured and used for other beneficial purposes. In addition, it is anticipated that the project will generate renewable energy credits for the City.

A feasibility study was conducted with PG&E to determine if current PG&E infrastructure would be adequate to accept the methane gas produced by the RODEO project. PG&E determined that the project is feasible and it has b een cleared by PG&E for further design. A contract with PG&E for preliminary engineering of a methane gas Pipeline Injection Station would need to be executed for an initial amount of $50,000. As the project development process continues, the contract with PG&E will need to be amended to provide additional funding for the construction of the Pipeline Injection Station, estimated at approximately $3,500,000.

On January 18, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -001 authorizing the submission of applications for all California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) grants for which the City is eligible through January 18, 2027. The Resolution also authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute in the name of the City all grant documents, applications, agreements, amendments, and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project.

In May 2023, the Solid Waste and Wastewater utilities hired a consultant to apply for a competitive grant from CalRecycle’s Organics Grant Program. The RODEO project was submitted for grant funding. These grant funds would cover project design and construction costs. On December 14, 2023, CalRecycle notified the City that the grant request was approved for the maximum award amount of $10,000,000.

Staff recommends the addition of $2,600,000 of wastewater reserve funds to the FY2023 -24 capital budget to complete the Project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project) Report to Redding City Council January 31, 2024
Re: 4.11(h)--Accept CalRecycle Grant Funding for the (RODEO) and adopt Budget Reso Page 3

Environmental Review

Funding acceptance is not a project as defined by the C alifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. Acceptance of the grant funding will allow the design and environmental technical studies to proceed for the Food Waste Receiving and Biogas Production Facility Project. CEQA compliance documentation would be presented to Council at, or prior to, award of the project.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map_
^ORG7 Award RFA
^Attachment I - ORG7 Project Summaries
^PG&E Agreement and Attachment A1
^Reso 2022-001 - Authorizing Submittal of Application(s) For All CalRecycle Grants CalRecycle December 2023 Monthly Public Meeting Agenda Revised

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project) RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 26th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060 APPROPRIATING $12,600,000 FOR THE REDDING ORGANICS DIVERSION TO

ENERGY OPERATION PROJECT AND THE ASSOCIATED FUNDIN G SOURCES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
231

6392

Wastewater Treatment Capital
Outlay

$12,600,000

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
231-6392-2910000-00000 Fund Balance 2,600,000$
Increase (Decrease) Revenue
231-6392-3631401-00000 State Grant Capital - Wastewater 10,000,000$ Increase Expenditures
231-6392-7800042-00000
Wastewater - Structures &
Improvements 12,600,000$
Total 12,600,000$ 12,600,000$
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $12,600,000 for the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation project and the associated funding sources for fiscal year 2023-24.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 6th day of February, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Request for Approval
To: Zoe Heller
Deputy Director, Division of Circular Economy

From: Michelle Martin
Branch Chief, Financial Resources Management Branch

Request Date: December 6, 2023

Decision Subject: Awards for the Organics Grant Program, Cycle 7 (Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, Fiscal Years 2021‒22 and 2022‒23, and General Fund, Fiscal Year 2022‒23)

Action By: December 13, 2023

Summary of Request
Staff requests approval of 23 grant awards in the amount of $130,620,128 for the competitive Organics Grant Program (Program) for fiscal years (FYs) 2021‒22 and 2022‒23. This Program was oversubscribed by $58,292,627 as $188,912,755 in funding was requested from 32 eligible applications received. The remaining passing applications, reflected in rank order in Table 3, could be funded if additional funds are allocated to this program in the future.

Funding
The FY 2021–22 proposed Budget, as amended by Senate Bill (SB 170) (Chapter 240, Statutes of 2021), allocated $70,000,000 to CalRecycle from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, with $3,500,000 reserved to cover administrative costs, as authorized in the Budget and shall be used to provide grants for the purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), or (5) of subdivision (b) of Section 42999 of the Public Resources Code. CalRecycle allocated $4,240,000 for a regional cycle of the Community Composting for Green Spaces Grant Program and $510,000 for a separate grant cycle for community composting projects, available only to Qualifying Tribal Entities. The remaining funding in the amount of $61,750,000 is recommended for award in this RFA.

The FY 2022–23 Budget, as amended by Assembly Bill (AB) 179 (Chapter 249, Statutes of 2022), allocated $15,000,000 to CalRecycle from the General Fund, with $750,000 reserved to cover administrative costs, as authorized in the Budget. CalRecycle has awarded $12,338,802 of the FY 2022–23 money in the cycle of the Organics Grant Program. The remaining $1,911,198 allocation for the purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), or (5) of subdivision (b) of Section 42999 of the Public Resources Code is recommended for award in this RFA.

The FY 2022–23 Budget, as amended by AB 179, allocated $10,000,000 to CalRecycle from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, with $500,000 reserved to cover administrative costs, as authorized in the Budget. CalRecycle awarded $3,950,527 of the FY 2022–23 money to an unfunded applicant from the Co-Digestion Grant Program, resulting in $5,549,473 being recommended for award for purposes of paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) of Section 42999 of the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Public Resources Code. In addition, AB 179 allocated $180,000,000 to provide grants to local jurisdictions to assist in the implementation of SB 1383 (Lara, Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016).

Of that allocation, $81,000,000 was allocated to the Organics Grant Program to fund the immediate, critical infrastructure needed to process organic waste as required by SB 1383.

Eligible entities for this funding include cities, counties, cities and counties, Joint Powers Authorities, and special districts directly responsible for solid waste collection services.

CalRecycle recommends utilizing $61,409,457 of this funding to award all local jurisdiction applications with a passing score. The remaining amount of $19,590,543 will be redirected to the SB1383 Local Assistance Grant Program.

Table 1. Funding
Fund Source Amount
Available
Amount to
Fund Item
Amount
Remaining Line Item
Greenhouse Gas
Reduction Fund (FY
2021–22)
$61,750,000 $61,750,000 $0 Local Assistance
/Organic
Infrastructure
Grants
General Fund (FY
2022–23)
$1,911,198 $1,911,198 $0 Local Assistance
/Organic
Infrastructure
Grants
Greenhouse Gas
Reduction Fund (FY
2022–23
$5,549,473 $5,549,473 $0 Local Assistance
/Co-Digestion
Grants
Greenhouse Gas
Reduction Fund (FY
2022–23
$81,000,000 $61,409,457 $19,590,543 Local Assistance
/SB 1383 Grants
Total

$150,210,671 $130,620,128 $19,590,543

Background and Findings
Statutory Authority
Public Resources Code section 42995 et seq., added to statute by the enactment of SB 862 (Statutes of 2014, Chapter 36) and amended by SB 155 (Statutes of 2021, Chapter 258), authorizes CalRecycle to administer a grant program to provide financial assistance to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) by promoting in-state development of infrastructure, food waste prevention, or other projects to reduce organic waste or process organic and other recyclable materials into new, value-added products.

Program Background
This Program is part of California Climate Investments, a statewide program that puts billions of Cap-and-Trade dollars to work reducing GHG emissions, strengthening the economy, and improving public health and the environment. At least 35 percent of California Climate Investments must benefit disadvantaged communities, low-income communities, and low- income households, collectively known as priority populations.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

This Program provides funds to support expansion of the waste management infrastructure, particularly for new or expanded organics infrastructure such as composting and digestion facilities, to achieve greenhouse gas reductions. These investments will result in reduced methane emissions from landfills; benefit priority populations by upgrading existing facilities and, where warranted, establish new facilities; result in air and water quality benefits in addition to greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions; and create jobs.

Criteria and Process
The Eligibility Criteria and Evaluation Process was discussed at the December 20, 2022, CalRecycle Public meeting and subsequently approved by the Deputy Director. The Notice of Funds Available was published on CalRecycle’s website on February 9, 2023, and a notice was sent to interested parties.

Applications were due to CalRecycle on May 2, 2023, with a secondary due date of May 11, 2023, for authorizing documentation submission. CalRecycle received 69 applications requesting a total of $387,845,869.30. After the close of the application period, staff reviewed the applications for completeness and eligibility. As a result, 20 applications were disqualified for either submitting an incomplete application or having an ineligible project. Staff reviewed the remaining applications in accordance with the approved evaluation and scoring criteria.

Subsequently, 17 applications did not receive a passing score. The maximum grant award is $500,000 for in-vessel projects, $3,000,000 for stand-alone pre-processing projects, $10,000,000 for anaerobic/co-digestion and compost projects, and $13,000,000 for anaerobic/co-digestion and compost projects with a pre-processing project. Staff proposes to fund 23 of the 32 eligible applicants. If additional monies become available, staff recommends funding the remaining eligible applicants in rank order, as listed in Table 3. As a result of the projects recommended for award, 7.7 million tons of green and food material will be diverted from landfills, a reduction of over 2 million MTCO
2e in greenhouse gas emissions, and 114 jobs
will be created.

Attachments
See Attachment I – Project Summaries for a description of each project recommended for award.

Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of 23 grant awards as listed below for a total of $130,620,128.

Table 2. Recommended Awards
Applicant Project Type Award
Amount
Humboldt Waste Management
Authority*
Standalone Pre-Processing $2,710,081
Kochergen Farms Composting,
Inc. dba Green Valley
Recycling
Standalone Pre-Processing $3,000,000

* SB 1383 Funding Recipient

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Applicant Project Type Award
Amount
Republic Services of Sonoma
County, Inc.

Standalone Pre-Processing $2,461,423
Sacramento County* Standalone Pre-Processing $3,000,000 Subtotal $11,171,504
California Grinding, Inc. Anaerobic Digestion $6,625,956† City of Napa* Anaerobic Digestion $10,000,000
City of Riverside* Co-Digestion $10,000,000
City of Redding* Co-Digestion $10,000,000
Los Angeles County Sanitation
Districts*
Co-Digestion $10,000,000
SANCO Services LP Anaerobic Digestion $10,000,000
University of California, Davis Anaerobic Digestion $4,769,324 Subtotal $61,395,280
Anderson Landfill, Inc. Compost $10,000,000
California Wood Recycling dba
Agromin
Compost $10,000,000
Forward, Inc. Compost $5,167,510
Kern County* Compost $10,000,000
Northern Recycling, LLC Compost $10,000,000
Riverside County* Compost $1,288,470
Western Placer Waste
Management Authority*
Compost $9,960,379
Subtotal $56,416,359
California State University,
Sacramento
In-Vessel $179,618
DSM Group, LLC In-Vessel $341,367
Foodbank of Santa Barbara -
Goleta
In-Vessel $500,000
Foodbank of Santa Barbara -
Santa Maria
In-Vessel $500,000
University of Southern
California
In-Vessel $116,000
Subtotal $1,636,985
Grand Total $130,620,128

† Recommending partial award due to limited funds. Remaining amount included in Table 3.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Table 3. Recommended Awards if Additional Funds Become
Available - B- List

Applicant Project Type Approved
Amount
California Grinding, Inc. Anaerobic Digestion $3,236,544‡ Arakelian Enterprises, Inc. DBA
Crown Recycling Services
Standalone Pre-Processing $3,000,000
Recology Ostrom Road Compost $10,000,000
Engel & Gray, Inc. Compost $2,799,620
Arakelian Enterprises, Inc., dba
American Organics
Compost $9,636,000
Universal Waste Systems, Inc. Standalone Pre-Processing $3,000,000 Mid-Valley Recycling, LLC Anaerobic Digestion $10,000,000 North State Renewables LLC Anaerobic Digestion $10,000,000 Paso Robles Waste Disposal
Inc. dba Paso Robles Waste &
Recycle
Anaerobic Digestion $2,643,200
Lost Hills Environmental LLC Compost $3,977,263
Total $58,292,267

Deputy Director Action
On the basis of the information and analysis in this Request for Approval and the findings set out herein, I hereby conditionally approve the grant awards for the Organics Grant Program as listed in Table 2. Each proposed grantee’s award is subject to two conditions:

1. The recommended grantee must pay all outstanding debts due to CalRecycle, or bring current any outstanding payments owed to CalRecycle, within 60 days of the date of the award email.

2. The recommended grantee’s Signature Authority (or where delegation is authorized, his or her Designee) must sign and return the Grant Agreement to CalRecycle. The signed Grant Agreement must be received by CalRecycle within 60 days of the date of the award email.

___________________________ ____________________________ Zoe Heller Dated
Deputy Director

‡ Remaining recommended award amount from Table 2.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
Attachment I
Organics Grant Program, Fiscal Year 2021–22
and 2022–23 Project Summaries

The projects with proposed grant awards are briefly summarized below. Note that in some instances, CalRecycle modified GHG emission reductions and tons diverted estimates contained within the application documents due to factors such as ineligible feedstock and tonnages reported outside of the grant term.

Standalone Pre-Processing
• Applicant: Humboldt Waste Management Authority
• County: Humboldt
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $2,710,081
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 47,298
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 237,823

Humboldt Waste Management Authority proposes a Stand-Alone Pre-Processing project to convert an existing 19,000-square-foot building at the Hawthorne Street Transfer Station located in Eureka, CA into an Organics Waste Processing Operation. The renovated facility will be used to receive, sort and process new residential co-collected and commercial source-separated food and green material currently disposed of at the Dry Creek Landfill. Commercial food material will be cleaned and processed into an organic slurry that will be transported to a composting facility. The project will result in 237,823 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 47,298 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will provide an estimated five full-time jobs targeted for priority populations and supports Humboldt County’s edible food recovery program.

• Applicant: Kochergen Farms Composting, Inc. dba Green Valley Recycling • County: Fresno
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $3,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 99,447
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 461,137

Kochergen Farms Composting, Inc. (KFC), DBA Green Valley Recycling (GVR) proposes a Stand- Alone Pre-Processing project to install a food waste depackaging system, at the Green Valley Recycling Transfer and Processing Facility. Source separated food and green material (SSO) will be cleaned and processed into an organic slurry that will be transferred to KFC for composting. The SSO and residential food material is currently disposed of at the American Avenue Landfill in Fresno County, CA, located in a low-income community. The project will result in 461,137 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 90,447 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will provide up to 15 jobs targeted for priority populations.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
• Applicant: Republic Services of Sonoma County, Inc.
• County: Sonoma
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $2,461,423
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 163,020
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 452,833

Republic Services of Sonoma County, Inc. proposes a Stand-Alone Pre-Processing project at their Sonoma County Central Transfer/Processing Facility in Petaluma, CA. This project will install a depackaging system to remove contamination from source-separated commercial food material currently disposed of at the Republic Services of Sonoma County, Inc. Central Disposal Site. Food and green material will be sent to Republic Services of Sonoma County’s composting facility in Richmond. The project will result in 452,833 tons of newly diverted food and green material from a landfill located in a low-income community and a reduction of 163,020 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas
emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will provide an estimated two full-time permanent jobs targeted for priority populations.

• Applicant: Sacramento County
• County: Sacramento
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $3,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 94,357
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 452,760

Sacramento County Department of Waste Management and Recycling proposes a Stand-Alone Pre- Processing project to construct a dedicated building at its North Area Recovery Station for the pre- processing of food and green material currently disposed of at Kiefer Landfill. Commingled food and green material generated from residential curbside collection will be delivered to the new facility and pre-processed to remove contaminants. Once food and green material are pre-processed into one of four top load-out ports within the new transfer building, it is transferred to a permitted composting facility. The project will result in 452,760 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 94,357 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. The project will provide job training to members of priority populations that will lead to industry recognized licenses/certifications.

Anaerobic Digestion/Co-Digestion
• Applicant: California Grinding, Inc.
• County: Fresno
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $6,625,956
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 150,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 390,000

California Grinding Inc (CGI) proposes to build an anaerobic digestion facility that will include installation of pre-processing equipment, anaerobic digesters, a biogas upgrading system, and a pre- digestion system. The food and green material are currently landfilled at American Avenue Disposal Site, Visalia Disposal Site, and Woodville Landfill. The project will result in 390,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfills located in disadvantaged and low-income communities

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
and a reduction of 150,000 MTCO2e over ten years. The facility will produce renewable natural gas that will be injected into the adjacent PG&E pipeline and provide an estimated 26 permanent jobs targeting priority populations.
• Applicant: City of Napa
• County: Napa
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 120,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 300,000

The City of Napa proposes to add an anaerobic digestion operation at its material diversion facility.

The project will include installation of food waste pre-processing and polishing equipment, an anaerobic digester, and a biogas upgrading system. The biogas will be used to produce compressed natural gas for on-site fueling of City trucks and Napa Recycling and Waste Services solid waste collection vehicles and renewable electricity to power facility operations. The digestate will typically be composted on-site in the covered aerated static pile unit or sent to another composting facility, if needed, but can also be dried and sold as fertilizer. The food and green material are currently landfilled at Vasco Road, Potrero Hills, Ox Mountain, and Clover Flat Landfills. The project will result in 300,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 120,000 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. The project will provide five permanent, full- time jobs targeting priority populations.
• Applicant: City of Riverside
• County: Riverside
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 81,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 200,000

The City of Riverside proposes the installation of food waste receiving, pre-processing, polishing, and storage infrastructure, as part of the Riverside Water Quality Control Plant co-digestion project. The project will significantly expand the facility’s food waste receiving and anaerobic co-digestion capacity. Food waste cake will be received via dump trucks, polished to a slurry to remove plastic and grit contaminants, and then co-digested with wastewater sludge. The biogas produced will be upgraded to renewable natural gas and injected into the SoCalGas utility pipeline. The commingled food and green material are currently landfilled at Badlands and Lamb Canyon Landfills. The project will result in 200,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material partially from a landfill located in a low-income community and a reduction of 81,000 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten
years. Benefits to priority populations include energy rate stabilization, air pollution reduction, and reduced impact to freshwater resources; as well as a wastewater treatment operator-in-training program targeted to local workers.
• Applicant: City of Redding
• County: Shasta
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO
2e) over ten years: 9,000

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 40,000

The City of Redding proposes to design and construct infrastructure that will enable the City to utilize excess anaerobic digestion capacity at the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to divert food material from landfills for co-digestion. The project will include the construction of food waste slurry receiving equipment and storage tanks, a polishing process for intake of feedstock into the existing anaerobic digesters, and a two-stage biogas conditioning system to meet the increased output of biogas before injecting this renewable natural gas into the PG&E gas transmission main. The source- separated food and green material is currently landfilled at West Central Landfill. The project will result in 40,000 tons of newly diverted food material from a landfill located in a low-income community, a reduction of over 9,000 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years, and will create one full-time permanent job.
• Applicant: Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts
• County: Los Angeles
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 160,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 600,000

Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) proposes to expand its Food Waste Recycling Program with the construction of the Biogas Conditioning System 2 (BCS-2), which will include equipment such as biogas compression, dehydration, and treatment systems. BCS-2 will allow the co-digestion facility to operate at full capacity. BCS-2 will upgrade biogas generated from the co- digestion of food material at LACSD’s Joint Water Pollution Control Plant into renewable natural gas for vehicle use at LACSD's compressed natural gas fueling station or injection into the SoCalGas utility pipeline. The source-separated food material is currently being landfilled at Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill, Lost Hills Environmental Waste Facility, and Salton City Solid Waste Site. The project will result in 600,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfills located in disadvantaged and low-income communities and a reduction of 160,000 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas
emissions over ten years. Benefits to priority populations include air and water pollution reduction and energy from renewable natural gas.
• Applicant: SANCO Services LP
• County: San Diego
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO
2e) over ten years: 300,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 775,000

SANCO Services LP proposes to expand its anaerobic digestion operation located at the Escondido Resource Recovery facility. The project will include the installation of two new digesters and a biogas upgrading system. The facility will also produce high-quality compost that will be sent to farms in San Diego and Imperial Counties. The project will add renewable gas injected into the San Diego Gas and Electric pipeline and be used to fuel waste collection fleets. The commingled and source-separated food and green material is currently landfilled at Sycamore and Otay Landfills. The project will result in 775,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of over

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
300,000 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years, and create an estimated eight permanent jobs targeting priority populations.
• Applicant: University of California, Davis
• County: Yolo
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $4,769,324
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 18,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 75,000

UC Davis proposes to expand its Renewable Energy Anaerobic Digester facility. The facility improvements will consist of upgraded feedstock processing equipment and the installation of a gas engine generator. The food and green material are currently landfilled at Yolo County Landfill. The project will result in 75,000 tons of newly diverted food material from landfill and a reduction of 18,000 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. The project will also produce green, carbon- negative electricity for use in campus electric vehicles and electric buses, which serves the campus and surrounding community, including grade-school students, low-income residents, disabled persons, and older adults.

Compost
• Applicant: Anderson Landfill, Inc.
• County: Shasta
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 30,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 122,000

Anderson Landfill, Inc. proposes to construct and operate a new windrow composting operation at Anderson Landfill. The newly constructed facility will have an initial throughput capacity of approximately 68,000 tons per year. The food and yard material are currently landfilled at Anderson Landfill which is located in a low-income community. The project will result in 122,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 30,000 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas
emissions over ten years. In addition, the facility will dedicate part of their landfill as wildlife habitat, provide financial support for various community centers, and provide an estimated eight new full-time jobs targeting a priority population.

• Applicant: California Wood Recycling dba Agromin
• County: Ventura
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO
2e) over ten years: 147,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 681,000

California Wood Recycling dba Agromin proposes to expand its existing composting facility in Santa Paula. The Limoneira site will utilize a covered aerated static pile composting system to divert an additional 68,125 tons per year of food and green material from landfill. The green and food material is currently landfilled at Simi Valley Landfill, Toland Road Landfill, or Lost Hills Landfill. The project will result in 681,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
147,000 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will provide 26 jobs targeting a priority population, support community projects with free compost, and provide funds for the Santa Paula Sports Park rehabilitation project.

• Applicant: Forward, Inc.
• County: San Joaquin
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $5,167,510
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 102,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 467,000

Forward, Inc. proposes to expand their existing composting facility by adding an aerated static pile composting system that can process an additional 200 tons of organics per day. The green and food material is currently landfilled at Forward, Inc. Landfill or Austin Road Landfill, with Forward, Inc.

Landfill located in a disadvantaged community. The project will result in 467,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 102,000 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas
emissions over ten years. The project will provide free compost to the community, support the Edible Schoolyard Community Farm Project, and provide three full time permanent jobs targeting a priority population.

• Applicant: Kern County
• County: Kern
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO
2e) over ten years: 247,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 831,000

Kern County Public Works proposes to construct a covered aerated static pile composting system at its facility located at the Shafter Wasco Sanitary Landfill. Grant-funded equipment includes an excavator, conveyer, shredder, screen and other pre-processing equipment, and a covered aerated static pile bunker system. The green and food material is currently landfilled at Shafter-Wasco Landfill, Mojave-Rosamond Sanitary Landfill, Bena Sanitary Landfill, or Ridgecrest Recycling and Sanitary Landfill, with Shafter-Wasco Landfill located in a disadvantaged community. The project will increase composting capacity by 100,000 tons per year and result in 831,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 247,000 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas
emissions over ten years. It will also provide free compost for expanding tree and green zones in Kern County, and hire an estimated six new full-time permanent jobs targeting a priority population.

• Applicant: Northern Recycling, LLC
• County: Yolo
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 114,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 330,000

Northern Recycling, LLC proposes to expand a covered aerated static pile composting facility located at Yolo County Central Landfill. Grant funds will be used for a composting aeration system, working pads, and equipment to screen and sort food and green material. The green and food material is currently landfilled at Forward Landfill, Kiefer Road Landfill, Lockwood Landfill, Potrero Hills Landfill,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
Neal Road Landfill, or Keller Canyon. The project will divert an additional 32,970 tons per year of food and local communities’ green material from landfills. The project will result in 330,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 114,000 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will reduce pesticide and groundwater use in the surrounding agriculture community, support edible food recovery, and provide an estimated seven new full-time permanent jobs targeting a priority population.

• Applicant: Riverside County
• County: Riverside
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $1,288,470
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 9,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 59,000

Riverside County proposes to construct a new windrow composting facility and purchase a loader and a water tank, for the newly operational Badlands Compost Facility. The source-separated food and green material is currently landfilled at the Badlands Landfill which is located in a disadvantaged community. The project will result in 59,000 tons of newly diverted green material from landfill and a reduction of 9,000 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will provide free compost for use in the local community, and an estimated two jobs targeting a priority population.

• Applicant: Western Placer Waste Management Authority
• County: Placer
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: No
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $9,960,379
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 296,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 1,259,000

Western Placer Waste Management Authority proposes to construct a new aerated static pile composting facility and increase capacity to process food and green material. Additionally, grant funds will purchase equipment, including a grinder, stacker, conveyer, magnet, screens, and blowers.

The green and food material is currently landfilled at the Western Regional Sanitary Landfill. The project will result in 1,259,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 296,000 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years.

In-Vessel

• Applicant: California State University, Sacramento
• County: Sacramento
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: No
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $179,618
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 345
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 958

Sacramento State University proposes to replace an organics compactor located at the Dining Commons with an in-vessel composting system. This will eliminate the need for the waste hauler to provide service for the compactor, which will reduce emissions associated with waste transportation.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
In addition, the food material will be composted on-site instead of being sent to Yolo County Landfill.

The compost will be used to fertilize campus lawns at Sacramento State by Grounds and Landscape Services and donated to Sacramento City Unified School District school gardens. The project will result in 958 tons of newly diverted food material from landfill and a reduction of 345 MTCO 2e of
greenhouse gas emissions over ten years.

• Applicant: DSM Group, LLC
• County: Sacramento
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $341,367
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 41
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 260

DSM Group proposes to purchase an in-vessel composter to divert green material from cannabis production. Grant funds will also be used to purchase a bobcat skid steer loader with compost mixer, a compost bagger, and a woodchipper. The project will divert green material from the L and D Landfill located in a disadvantaged community. The project will result in 260 tons of newly diverted green material from landfill and a reduction of 41 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years.

• Applicant: Foodbank of Santa Barbara - Goleta
• County: Santa Barbara
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: No
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $500,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 109
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 301

The Foodbank of Santa Barbara County proposes to install an in-vessel composter at their Goleta warehouse. The project will divert pre-consumer inedible food material from the Tajiguas Landfill located in Goleta. The composter will transform food material into compost that can be shared with the community. The project will result in 301 tons of newly diverted food material from landfill and a reduction of 109 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years.

• Applicant: Foodbank of Santa Barbara - Santa Maria
• County: Santa Barbara
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $500,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 116
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 321

The Foodbank of Santa Barbara County proposes to install an in-vessel composter at their Santa Maria warehouse. The project will divert pre-consumer inedible food material from the Santa Maria Regional Landfill located in a low-income community. The composter will transform the food material into compost that can be shared with the community. The project will result in 321 tons of newly diverted food material from landfill and a reduction of 116 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas emissions over
ten years. In addition, the project will provide free compost for use in the local community.

• Applicant: University of Southern California
• County: Los Angeles
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $116,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 168
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 530

University of Southern California proposes to purchase an in-vessel composting system and hydraulic lift to be added to the LA Memorial Coliseum grounds by the University of Southern California. The in- vessel composter will be used for non-event days to capture food and green material produced on- site, diverting this material from the Sunshine Canyon Landfill. The project is located in a disadvantaged community and will reduce the environmental and health impacts of transportation the food and green material. The compost produced will be used to improve and expand landscaping and support other compost projects on site and the University of Southern California. The project will result in 530 tons of food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 168 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

SERVICES AGREEMENT

† Information collecte d on t his form is used in accorda nce wit h PG&E’s Privacy Policy. Page 1 of 7 The Privacy Policy is available at pge.com/privacy. Form No. 79-1209 Advice 4366-G
Automated Documents, Preliminary Statement, Part A January 2021 This SERVICES AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the latest signature date in the signature block of this Agreement ("Effective Date") by and between Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation ("Utility"), and ___________________________________________________________ (the "Company").

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Utility is a public utility regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") providing gas service to end-use customers within California.

WHEREAS, the Company is a sponsor of a renewable gas project and/or has an interest in Utility's ability to receive and redeliver additional renewable gas supplies on its gas utility system.

WHEREAS, the Company desires to explore a Utility interconnection, and the Utility agrees to perform services with respect thereto (the "Services"), all upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein the parties agree as follows:

SECTION 1 - SERVICES

1.1. Retention. Company hereby retains Utility to provide the Services, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

1.2. Scope of Services. The Services to be performed by Utility shall consist of the following tasks to this Agreement, including (check all that apply), as detailed in the applicable Attachment:
• Attachment A - Interconnection Screening Study ( ), • Attachment A1 - Preliminary Engineering Study ( ), • Attachment A2 - Detailed Engineering Study with Optional Long Lead Material Procurement ( ),
• Attachment - A3 Pipeline Blending Exception Study ( )

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

SERVICES AGREEMENT

Automated Documents, Preliminary Statement, Part A Page 2 of 7 Form No. 79-1209
Advice 4366-G
January 2021
Unless Company has in place as of the Effective Date a valid and effective Interconnection Screening Study, the parties must (a) execute, and each party must satisfy its obligations with respect to Attachment A before Company can contract for Attachment A1, and (b) execute Attachment A1 before or concurrent with Company's contracting for Attachment A2. Further, (x) Company may execute Attachment A3 at any time after the parties have executed an Attachment A providing Company funding for an Interconnector Screening Study consistent with Attachment A3 Services, and (y) the parties must enter into a Confidentiality Agreement, the form of which is attached hereto as Attachment B, prior to Utility performing any Services pursuant to this Agreement. Each Attachment only becomes effective upon execution by both Company and Utility. No construction work shall be included or done pursuant to this Agreement.

1.3. Term. This Agreement shall be effective on the Effective Date and shall continue in full force and effect until the completion of the all Services selected under Section 1.2 above.

SECTION 2 - COMPENSATION AND EXPENSES

2.1. Compensation. An estimate of Utility's fees and all other applicable costs to be billed by Utility to Company under this Agreement are set forth in each applicable Attachment to this Agreement. In any event, Company shall be liable for the actual costs of the Services, which may be higher than the estimated costs. Actual costs shall include the actual Services rendered and all related costs incurred, and shall include permit or other fees or charges, procurement, indirect costs and overheads, carrying costs, and any related income or other tax liability thereon.

2.2. Payment. Upon execution of this Agreement, Attachment A, and Attachment B (Confidentiality Agreement), Company shall make payment to Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Services in the amount specified in Attachment A within thirty (30) days. Upon execution of any additional Attachment (as further described in Section

1.2), Company shall make payment to Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Services in the amount specified in such Attachment(s) within thirty (30) days. Any amount billed by Utility to Company subsequent to the initial payment shall be paid by Company within twenty (20) days after receipt of Utility's invoice to the address set forth in Section 8 below.

2.3. Change Orders. Any change to the Services shall be in writing (a "Change Order") and signed by Company and Utility. If Company issues any request for a change in the Scope of the Services or the time of completion of the Services beyond those tasks described in the Services and not identified as a Change Order, but which Utility considers to be a Change Order, then Utility shall notify Company in writing and the parties shall mutually decide whether such a change in the Services or the time of completion of the Services constitutes a Change Order, which increases or decreases the Scope of the Services and increases or decreases the cost to Utility of performing the Services. If Utility issues a Change Order that results in an increase or decrease in the cost of the Services, then an adjustment shall be made to the total compensation

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

SERVICES AGREEMENT

Automated Documents, Preliminary Statement, Part A Page 3 of 7 Form No. 79-1209
Advice 4366-G
January 2021
and/or the time of completion of the Services. All written Change Orders shall become a part of this Agreement. Utility may refrain from any additional work until Company has paid such additional amount as set forth above.

2.4. Payroll Taxes. Social security, federal, and other applicable taxes shall not be withheld from payments made to Utility.

SECTION 3 - INFORMATION AND OWNERSHIP

3.1. Confidential Information. During the term of this Agreement, either party may have access to and become acquainted with confidential information and trade and business secrets of the other. Treatment of this information by both parties is set forth in the Confidentiality Agreement, the form of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment B of this Agreement (the "Confidentiality Agreement").

3.2. Ownership and Use; Limits on Liability. Notwithstanding the above, any and all material and information prepared, accumulated or developed by Utility, any subcontractor or their respective employees, including, without limitation, documents, drawings, designs, calculations, maps, plans, workplans, text, filings, estimates, manifests, certificates, books, specifications, sketches , notes, reports, summaries, analyses, data models and samples (hereinafter, collectively "Work Product"), shall remain the property of Utility when prepared or in process, whether or not delivered to Company. Utility hereby grants to Company an unrestricted royalty-free license to use, copy, and distribute any Work Product furnished by Utility to Company under this Agreement, subject to the terms specified in the Confidentiality Agreement. The Work Product provided by Utility hereunder is intended to meet or exceed all generally accepted industry standards for this type of work; however, except as may otherwise be set forth in the applicable Attachment(s), Utility makes no warranty or representation about the fitness, suitability, reliability, availability, timeliness or accuracy of Work Product or Services for any purpose. The Work Product will be done using information and assumptions at one point of time and which are subject to change at any time that could change the results or analysis reflected in Work Product. Estimates of costs may not cover all environmental costs or other unforeseen costs, or costs resulting f rom changes to laws, rules and regulations governing the Services herein. Therefore, except as may otherwise be set forth in the applicable Attachment(s), Utility does not warrant the Services or Work Product for any use and specifically disclaims any liability for any subsequent use of the Work Product, or any part thereof, by Company. Except as may otherwise be set forth in the applicable Attachment(s), no warranty of any kind is or will be included as part of the Services and all express and implied warranties, including any warranties of merchantability, and/or fitness for a particular purpose are specifically disclaimed. With the exception of claims solely arising from the gross negligence or intentional misconduct by Utility that occurs while performing the Services, Company will not hold Utility liable or responsible in any way for any losses, damages, claims, costs, expenses or other obligations it incurs, or may incur, arising out of or related to Company's use of, or reliance on, any part of the Services, Work Product or other information provided by Utility hereunder.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

SERVICES AGREEMENT
Automated Documents, Preliminary Statement, Part A Page 4 of 7 Form No. 79-1209
Advice 4366-G
January 2021
SECTION 4 - STATUS
The relationship between Utility and Company hereunder is and at all times during the term of this Agreement shall be that of independent entities. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to create a relationship of principal and agent, employer and employee, partnership or joint venture between the parties.

SECTION 5 - ATTORNEYS' FEES
Should any dispute arise regarding any term or provision of this Agreement or enforcement of any rights hereunder, or to collect any portion of the amount payable under this Agreement, then all litigation and collection expenses, witness fees, court costs and attorneys' fees shall be paid by the losing party to the prevailing party.

SECTION 6 - SUPERVISION AND COORDINATION
During the term of this Agreement, each party shall appoint a representative who will be authorized, empowered and available to act for and on behalf of each to implement the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

SECTION 7 - DISPUTES
Any dispute or need for interpretation arising out of this Agreement which cannot be resolved after a reasonable period of time of good faith negotiation may be submitted to the CPUC for resolution.

SECTION 8 - NOTICES
Any notice, demand, or request required or authorized in connection with this Agreement shall be deemed properly and duly given when sent by electronic mail as specified below:

If to Company:

E-mail Address:

If to Utility:

E-mail Address:

In addition to the notice specified above, notice may also be provided by telephone or e-mail to the telephone numbers and e-mail addresses for the representative appointed pursuant to

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

SERVICES AGREEMENT
Automated Documents, Preliminary Statement, Part A Page 5 of 7 Form No. 79-1209
Advice 4366-G
January 2021
Section 6 above set out below, but must be immediately followed up by a written notice sent pursuant to the first paragraph of this Section 8:

If to Company:

Tel
ephone Numbers:

E-mail Address:

If to Utility:

Telephone Numbers:

E-mail Address:

Either party may change the notice information in this Section 8 by giving notice within five (5) business days prior to the effective date of the change.

SECTION 9 - SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
This Agreement may be not be assigned by either party without the written consent of the other party. Consent to assignment will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.

Company shall have the right to assign this Agreement, without the consent of Utility, for collateral security purposes to aid in providing financing its renewable gas project. Company will promptly notify Utility of any such assignment for collateral security purposes. Any assignment for collateral purposes entered into by Company shall require that upon any exercise of remedies by the financing party, the entity substituted for Company shall have an equal or greater credit rating as Company and have the legal authority and operational ability to satisfy the obligations of Company under this Agreement.

Either party shall have the right to assign this Agreement, without the consent of the other Party, when the assignment is to a successor, representative, or assignee which shall succeed by purchase, merger, corporate reorganization/restructuring or consolidation to all or substantially all of the assets of the assigning party.

Assignment shall not relieve the assignor of its obligations under this Agreement for the period before the assignment becomes effective, nor shall the non-assigning party's obligations be enlarged, in whole or in part, by reason of the assignment. At the time the assignment becomes effective, the assignee shall become a party to this Agreement and shall undertake all rights and responsibilities under this Agreement.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

SERVICES AGREEMENT
Automated Documents, Preliminary Statement, Part A Page 6 of 7 Form No. 79-1209
Advice 4366-G
January 2021
Any attempted assignment that violates any of the requirements of this Section 9 is void and ineffective.

SECTION 10 - APPLICABLE LAW
The provisions of this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to its choice of law provisions.

SECTION 11 - WAIVERS
The failure or delay of either party to exercise or enforce at any time any of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute or be deemed a waiver of that party's right thereafter to enforce each and every provision of the Agreement and shall not otherwise affect the validity of this Agreement.

SECTION 12 - SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement is finally determined to be contrary to, prohibited by, or invalid under applicable laws or regulations, such provision shall become inapplicable and shall be deemed omitted from this Agreement. Such determination shall not, however, in any way invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

SECTION 13 - ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENTS
This Agreement and its Attachments constitute the entire understanding and agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any prior written or oral understanding or agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.

This Agreement shall not be amended, altered, or supplemented in any way except by an instrument in writing, signed by the duly authorized representative of the parties that expressly references this Agreement.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

SERVICES AGREEMENT
Automated Documents, Preliminary Statement, Part A Page 7 of 7 Form No. 79-1209
Advice 4366-G
January 2021
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of Effective Date.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Company Name
Signature Signature
Print Name Print Name
Title Title
Date Date

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY -
ATTACHMENT A-1
† Information collected on this form is used in accordance with PG&E’s Privacy Policy. Page 1 of 2 The Privacy Policy is available at pge.com/privacy. Form No. 79-1209A-1, Attachment A-1 Advice 4366-G
Automated Documents, Preliminary Statement, Part A January 2021 Utility will provide the Company with a report that provides a Preliminary Engineering Study ("PES") requested by the Company for construction of necessary facilities as described below (the "Services") following completion of an Interconnection Screening Study for the same location and less than or equal to the maximum volume / flow rate that will be the basis for this PES.

Utility proposes to analyze the impact on its gas transmission system of receiving

minimum, average and maximum,
respectively, thousand Standard cubic feet per day (MScfd) on a 1/24th ratable hourly
basis of new supply at ____________________________________________________, California, on a ( ) Displacement and/or an ( ) Expansion Receipt Point Capacity basis and identify any system improvements necessary to accept this new supply.

The cost estimate calculated by Utility will include, but not be limited to, land acquisition, site development, right-of-way, metering, gas quality, permitting, regulatory, environmental, unusual construction costs, and, if applicable, operating and maintenance costs for any facility improvements, accurate to +100% / -50% based on a site visit and route evaluation for the Company's project. The findings and estimate will not constitute a proposal by Utility. Utility will not have performed a specific site or route evaluation for the Company's project in the development of this estimate. Other service costs associated with construction of the Interconnector's Facility that are not part of already offered services could include, but not be limited to, engineering, consulting, contracting, construction costs, and environmental studies.

Utility's construction costs continue to rise with increasing costs of labor and materials.

Since the PES is developed using average historical project cost data, it is highly likely that the actual construction costs for the Company's particular project will vary significantly from the PES. Utility urges the Company to retain the services of a third- party engineering construction firm or enter into a Detailed Engineering Study with Utility to develop a more accurate construction cost estimate for this specific project.

Because of the exclusions and limitations of this initial review, Utility does not recommend that the Company use the PES for any other purpose, including any substantive planning or other decisions regarding the cost or viability of its project, except to further evaluate Company's project via a Utility Detailed Engineering Study.

Any use by the Company is solely at its own risk and should factor in the above risks and limitations.

A report that summarizes the results of Utility's analyses, identifies the study parameters, assumptions, limitations and the estimated construction costs of any facility improvements, evaluates whether the Interconnection Screening Study identified

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY -
ATTACHMENT A-1
Automated Documents, Preliminary Statement, Part A Page 2 of 2 Form No. 79-1209A-1, Attachment A-1
Advice 4366-G
January 2021
pipeline system has sufficient physical Takeaway Capacity to safely accommodate Company's specified maximum volume/flow rate on a ratable 1/24th h ourly basis, Utility pipeline routing recommendation using Utility's rights-of -way, identification of the then current maximum allowable operating pressure and, if available, the operating pressures of
the Utility's receiving pipeline system and potential pipeline route obstructions as determined by the Utility's physical observations will be provided to the Company.

T
he estimated cost to perform the Services is $ ________________________________.

Utility will complete the analysis within ____________________________ business days after receipt and Utility posting of payment.

Payment
in full of the estimated cost of the Services is required upon execution of an Attachment A1 to proceed with the analysis. The Company will be responsible for the actual
costs of the Services; to this end, an invoice or refund will be issued to the Company
at the completion for any difference between the actual costs and this estimate.

Capitalized term s used but not defined in this Attachment have the meaning ascribed to them in Utility's Tariff Rule No. 29.

Accepted and agreed to by their respective authorized representatives:

Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Company Name
Signature Signature
Print Name Print Name
Title Title
Date Date

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project) aEsoLUTzo v No. Za22- aol
A RESOLUTION C}F THE CITY COUNCIL F T IE CITY OF REDDING AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL 4F APPLICATIC? N( S) Ft3R ALL
CALRECYCLE + GRANTS F4R WHICH THE CITY OF REDDING IS

ELIGIBLE
WHEREAS, PublicResourcesCodesections4$000et seq. authorizetheDepartmentof ResourcesRecyeling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant programs {grants) in furtherance of the State of CaLifornia's {State} effarts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generatedin theStatetherebypreservinglandfillcapaeityandprotectingpublichealthandsafety, and the environment; and
WHEREAS, in furtheranceof thisauthorityCalRecycleisrequiredta establishprocedures governing the applieation, awarding, and management of the grants; and WHEREAS, CalRecyelegrant applicatianproceduresrequire, amangother tl ings, an applicant' s governing body to deelare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle grants;
NOW, THEREFQRE, the City Council RESC}LVES asfollows:

1. Toauthorizethesubmittalflf applicationo CalRecycleforall grantsfarwhichtheCityof Redding is eligible; and

2. ToauthorizetheCityManager, ordesignee, to executeinthenameoftheCityof Redding al1grant documents, including but not limited ta, applications, agreements, amendments and requestsfor payment, necessaryto secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project; and

3. To adopt these autharizations as effective for 5 years from the date of adoption of this resolution, until January 18, 2027.

I HEREBYCERTIFYthattheforegoingresolutionwasintroducedataregularmeeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the
18th
dayaf January, 2022, andwasduly adopted
at saidmeeting by the fallowing vote:

AYES: Councii Members - Dacquista, Mezzano, Resner, Winter, and Schreder NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: ouncii Members - None
ABSENT. Council Members— None
Y~
rF _.

R`ISTENSC EDER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPR{ JVED AS Tt? FORM:

PAMELA MIZE, Ci Clerk BARRY E. e ALT, ity A torney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Monthly Public Meeting

10:00 A.M., December 19, 2023
Cal/EPA Building – Byron Sher Auditorium
Via Webcast

A. DIRECTOR’S REPORT
Presentations or discussions by the Director and/or Executive Offices regarding department matters, legislative updates, public affairs, or initiatives.

B. POLICY & PROGRAM UPDATE

Action Items

1. SB 1383 Implementation
Consideration of a Technology Determination for H Cycle Pursuant to Article 2 of the SB 1383 Regulations
Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

C. GRANT AND LOAN PROGRAMS

Action Items

1. Awards for the Organics Grant Program (Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23) Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

2. Eligibility Criteria and Evaluation Process for the Redemption Innovation Grant Program (California Beverage Container Recycling Fund, Fiscal Year 2022-23) Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

3. Eligibility Criteria and Evaluation Process for the Local Conservation Corps SB 1013 Grant Program (SB1013, Fiscal Year 2022-23)
Department Staff Contact: [email protected]
Public Notice

4. Eligibility Criteria and Evaluation Process for the Workforce Development Grant Program (AB 179, Fiscal Year 2022‒23)
Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

Information Item

1. Award for the Beverage Container Redemption Pilot Project Grant Program (California Beverage Container Recycling Fund Fiscal Year 2022-23) Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

2. Awards for the Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Grant Program (Farm and Ranch Cleanup Account, Fiscal Year 2023-24) Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

3. Awards and Distribution of Payments for the Used Oil Payment Program (Used Oil Recycling Fund, Fiscal Year 2023-24)
Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

4. Awards for the Household Hazardous Waste Grant Program (Integrated Waste Management Account, Fiscal Year 2023-24)
Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

5. Awards for the Rubberized Pavement Grant Program (Tire Recycling Management Fund, Fiscal Year 2023-24)
Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

6. Approval of a Recycling Market Development Zone (RMDZ) Loan in the amount of $3,500,000 for Pinnpack Capital Holdings, a Delaware LLC (Recycling Market Development Revolving Loan Subaccount, Fiscal Year 2023–24).

Department Staff contact: [email protected] Public Notice

Open Applications:

Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Grant Program Application Due Dates: January 9, 2024 (Cycle 81); April 2, 2024 (Cycle 82) Beverage Container Recycling City/County Payment Program Application Due Date: January 17, 2024

Community Composting for Green Spaces Grant Program
Application Due Date: January 23, 2024

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

D. POLICY MANDATES/WORKSHOPS/RULEMAKING PROCEEDINGS

Extended Producer Responsibility Program Updates

1. SB 54 Implementation
Department Staff Contact: [email protected]

2. Review of the Drug Takeback Solutions Foundation’s Revised 2022 Annual Report for Covered Drugs
Department Staff Contact: [email protected]
Information Items

1. Consideration of Carpet America Recovery Effort’s Contingency Plan Amendment
Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

2. Overview of the 2022 California Waste Tire Market Report Department Staff contact: [email protected] Public Notice

Action Items

1. AB 1201 Bifurcated Collection Determination
Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

E. ELECTRONIC WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAM

Information Items

1. 2023 Covered Electronic Waste Net Cost Reporting Requirement Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

F. LOCAL ASSISTANCE

Action Items

1. Five-Year Review Report for the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan for the County of Alameda
Department Staff Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

G. SOLID WASTE AND TIRE FACILITIES

Action Items

1. City of Claremont Community Services Department, located at 1616 Monte Vista Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711, San Bernardino County, New Solid Waste Facilities Permit, Action Needed January 8, 2024
Department Contact: [email protected]
Public Notice

2. Bee Canyon Greenery, located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road, Irvine, CA 92602, Orange County, Revised Compostable Materials Handling Facility Permit, Action Needed December 31, 2023
Department Contact: [email protected]
Public Notice

3. Yolo County Central Landfill, located at 44090 CR 28H, Woodland, CA 95776, Yolo County, Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit, Action Needed January 19, 2024
Department Contact: [email protected]
Public Notice

4. Otay Mesa Compost Facility, located at 434 Alta Road, San Diego, CA 92154 San Diego County, New Compostable Materials Handling Facility Permit, Action Needed January 20, 2024
Department Contact: [email protected]
Public Notice

5. Mountain View Organic Waste Processing Facility, located at 1641 Mountain View Avenue, Oxnard, CA 93030, Ventura County, Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit, Action Needed February 3, 2024
Department Contact: [email protected] Public Notice

6. Madison Materials, Inc., located at 1035 East Fourth Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701, Orange County, Modified Solid Waste Facilities Permit, Action Needed February 3, 2024
Department Contact: [email protected]
Public Notice

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

H. PUBLIC COMMENT

Get involved in CalRecycle’s decision-making process. To more fully engage with Californians on monthly public meeting agenda items, CalRecycle accepts welcomes live public comments in-person or over-the-phone.
_____________________________________________________________________ CalRecycle has a public noticing site to provide interested parties with information about programs, activities, and departmental decisions.
• To review final CalRecycle decisions and other department activities, please go to: CalRecycle.ca.gov/PublicInfo/ or CalRecycle.ca.gov/BevContainer/Notices. • For public meeting participation, listserv, and feedback information, please go to:

CalRecycle.ca.gov/PublicMeeting/
People may speak on any matter concerning CalRecycle with the exception of items related to pending adjudicative (certification or enforcement) proceedings.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 338
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve Alternative for Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve and adopt the following:
(1) Adopt Resolution authorizing the submission of all California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery grant application(s) for which the City of Redding is eligible for a five-year period from December 3, 2024 through December 3, 2029 . This authorization includes applying for the Beverage Container Quality Infrastructure Grant program in the amount of $4,091,013 to upgrade and replace various sorting equipment in the City of Redding’s Material Recovery Facility on Abernathy Lane; and (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all grant documents necessary to complete the application process.

Fiscal Impact

There is n o fiscal impact in approving the resolution. If the City of Redding (City) submits a successful application for the Beverage Container Quality Infrastructure Grant (BCQIG) Program it would receive a $4,091,013 allocation from California Department of Resou rces Recycling and Recovery ( CalRecycle) with no required matching funds. This resolution allows the submission of subsequent grant applications through December 3, 2029.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could decline to authorize the resolution for grants to CalRecycle which would result in the City not applying or receiving any funding through the B CQIG Program. Further, a grant specific Council resolution would be required for each CalRecycle grant opportunity going forward.

MEETING DATE: December 3, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e) Adopt Resolution Authorizing Submission of Applications for all California Departmen t of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) Grants for Five Years
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 339
Report to Redding City Council November 26, 2024
Re: 4.11(e) Authorize CalRecycle Resolution Page 2

Background/Analysis

Each year, CalRecycle presents several opportunities to apply for grants. CalRecycle has developed a process for jurisdictions to streamline the submittals of grant applications whereby the governing body of the jurisdiction may pass a multi -year grant application resolution. The City previously adopted a multi -year Resolution, No. 2016-107, on December 14, 2016, and No. 2022-001, on January 18, 2022. The prior resolution expires during the grant term of the B CQIG Program, requiring a new resolution to be approved in order to complete the application process.

Pursuant to the City’s Grant Administration Policy Directives and Procedures Manual (Grant Administration Policy), all grant applications over $50,000 require Council approval. If the grant is awarded and the sum is over $25,000, staff will obtain Council approval. All CalRecycle grant applications and awards will comply with the City’s Grant Administration Policy. During the proposed five -year grant resolution term, a new resolution for ap plications will not be necessary.

The Public Works Department plans to submit and appl y for funding through the CalRecycle BCQIG Program. This is a competi tive grant program that will provide one -time funding to assist with infrastructure cost s in impro ving the quality of material sorting to create cleaner streams of recycled beverage containers substantially free from contaminates.

The City is requesting funding to support replacing and upgrading equipment on the material recovery sorting line, including adding robotic arms and AI software to help sort material.

Environmental Review

This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
^Resolution
Packet Pg. 340
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION(S) FOR ALL

CALRECYCLE GRANTS FOR WHICH THE CITY OF REDDING IS

ELIGIBLE

WHEREAS, Public Resources Code sections 48000 et seq. authorize the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant programs (grants) in furtherance of the State of California’s ( State) efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated in the State thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting public health and safety, and the environment; and

WHEREAS, in furtherance of this authority CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the application, awarding, and management of the grants; and

WHEREAS, CalRecycle grant application procedures require, among other things, an applicant’s governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle grants;

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council RESOLVES as follows:

1. To authorize the submittal of application to CalRecycle for all grants for which the City of Redding is eligible;

2. To authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute in the name of the City of Redding all grant documents, including but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project; and

3. To adopt these authorizations as effective for five (5) years from the date of adoption of this Resolution, until December 3, 2029.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 3rd day of December, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

__________________________________
, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 341
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(e) Authorize CalRecycle Resolution)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt a City of Redd ing (City) Personnel Policy - Password Policy providing guidance for administering passwords for the City as part of its efforts to maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the City’s information, systems, and networks.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact associated with approving the proposed City of Redding (City) Personnel Policy - Password Policy.

Alternative Action

The City Council could decline to approve the proposed Password Policy or provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

The City does not currently have a formal password policy and wishes to adopt a formal policy to improve the City’s cybersecurity protections as well as establish a baseline for administering passwords across applications.

Currently, our password procedure requires an 8 -character password with complexity requirements (e.g. special characters, numbers, capitalized and lower -case letters). The proposed policy would establish a 16 -character password with no complexity requirement s. Additionally, the current procedure requires passwords to expire every 90 days. With the change to a 16 - character password, passwords would expire every 365 days.

MEETING DATE: December 3, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.15(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(a)--Approval of new Personnel Password Policy Kari Kibler, Personnel
Director
Packet Pg. 342
Report to Redding City Council November 25, 2024
Re: 4.15(a)-- Approval of New Personnel Password Policy Page 2

In addition, the policy would establish cybersecurity hygiene practices related to passwords, such as not sharing or writing down passwords.

The proposed policy has been shared with each of the City’s Bargaining Units and no concerns were identified.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quali ty Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
^Final Personnel Policy - Password Policy
Packet Pg. 343

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

Password Policy

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE

12/3/2024

1 Personnel Director ____________________________ City Manager ________________________________

Purpose

The purpose of this policy is to establish a baseline for administering passwords for the City of Redding (City) as part of its effort to maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the City’s information, systems, and networks.

Scope

This policy applies to all City employees, contractors, and anyone who has a responsibility for an account or any form of access to the City’s information systems.

Individual departments or divisions may set their own password standards or procedures based on their requirements. However, standards or procedures must adhere at minimum to this policy and may not be less stringent.

Responsibility

The Cyber Security Officer (CSO) will be responsible for maintaining and updating this policy with the approval of the Chief Information Officer (CIO). The City’s Network Operations Center (NOC) Systems Administrators will be responsible for administering technical controls in the City’s Active Directory domain and all supported City applications. The City’s Integrated Public Safety (IPS) Systems Administrators will be responsible for administering technical controls in all supported IPS applications. Redding Electric Utility (REU) Operation Technology Engineers (OTEs) will be responsible for administering technical controls in all supported REU domains and applications. Redding Municipal Utility (RMU) will be responsible for the technical controls in all supported RMU domains and applications.

Policy

I) Individual Responsibilities
a. Passwords must be changed immediately upon issuance for the first-use. Initial passwords must be transmitted securely to individuals.
b. An individual’s passwords must never be shared for any reason. IT will never ask end-users for their password.
c. Passwords must be secured – Do not write passwords down or save them in a file on your computer. Passwords may be stored in a secure manner utilizing IT approved password manager solutions.
d. Users must log off or lock their workstations when not present. e. City passwords should not be the same as personal account passwords. f. Passwords must meet the requirements outlined in this policy in Section III.

Packet Pg. 344
Attachment: ^Final Personnel Policy - Password Policy (4.15(a)-- Approval of New Personnel Password Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

Password Policy

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE

12/3/2024

2 g. Compromised passwords shall be immediately changed and reported to the CSO or delegates.

II) Responsibilities of Systems Processing Passwords
a. Passwords must not be displayed while entering the password into the system. b. Passwords must be stored and transmitted in an encrypted format and not in clear-text.
c. Passwords must not be stored in clear-text as part of a script or scheduled task. d. Systems available to the Internet that allow access to the inside network or confidential information must be protected using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).
e. Systems must not store or allow ‘hints’ for remembering a password.

III) Password Requirements – Passwords must:
a. Contain at least 16 characters.
b. Not be the same as the User ID.
c. Not be a single dictionary word or proper name.
d. Expire within 365 days.
e. Not be the same as the previous 10 passwords.
f. Not be transmitted or stored in clear-text.
g. Systems or applications that cannot support the above requirements will be set to the highest level of password complexity supported by the system.

IV) Advanced Authentication
a. Advanced authentication (AA) can be used in place of passwords. b. AA includes the following methods:
i. Biometric.
ii. User-based digital certificates (Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)). iii. Smart-cards.
iv. Hardware tokens.
c. AA must:
i. Be specific to an individual user.
ii. Prohibit users from sharing a certificate.
iii. Require the user to activate or provision a certificate with a passphrase or PIN.
d. Identifier Management
i. Each user must be uniquely identified and verified.
ii. Identifier must be issued to the intended party.
iii. User identifiers will be disabled after 90 days of inactivity. e. Authentication Management
i. Authenticators will be distributed to end-users by IT.

Packet Pg. 345
Attachment: ^Final Personnel Policy - Password Policy (4.15(a)-- Approval of New Personnel Password Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

Password Policy

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE

12/3/2024

3 ii. Lost/stolen/compromised authenticators will be reported immediately and disabled by IT upon notice of compromise.
iii. Authenticators will be refreshed on a 3-year cycle. iv. Authenticators shall not be loaned or shared with other users.

V) Privileged Accounts
a. Privileged accounts should be stored in a Privileged Access Management (PAM) system and have their password rotated upon each use whenever possible. b. Privileged accounts that cannot be stored in a PAM system, or that cannot rotate passwords upon use, must change their password every 90 days. c. At least 4 characters must change with each password iteration. d. Passwords must meet the following complexity requirement:
i. Minimum of 20 characters long.
ii. Capital, lower-case, numbers, and special characters.

VI) Service Accounts
a. Service accounts should utilize a PAM or password managed service accounts (i.e. Group Managed Service Accounts (gSMAs)) to rotate passwords once per year.
b. Service account passwords should be generated from a PAM system and should utilize the following complexity requirements:
i. Minimum of 20 characters long.
ii. Capital, lower-case, numbers, and special characters. c. Service Account passwords must be changed when the Service Account administrator leaves the organization or changes roles within the organization.

VII) Account Lockout
a. Accounts will be locked out after 5 invalid attempts for 90 minutes. b. The account will remain locked for the lockout duration of 90 minutes or; until the end-user utilizes the AD Self Service tool or; the end-user contacts the Service Desk and verifies their identity to have the Service Desk unlock their account.
i. Note: Thin client users must call the Service Desk or use a PC to unlock accounts. AD Self-Service is not available on thin clients.

Password Self Service for Active Directory

• Passwords can be reset using the AD Self-Service tool at https://coradssp.ci.redding.ca.us:9251/

Packet Pg. 346
Attachment: ^Final Personnel Policy - Password Policy (4.15(a)-- Approval of New Personnel Password Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

Password Policy

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE

12/3/2024

4 • End-users can also access the AD Self-Service tool from their computer’s logon screen using the “Reset Password/Unlock Account” button in the lower-left corner of the screen.

Reporting a Suspected Compromised Password or Security Incident

If you believe your password has been compromised or if you have been asked to provide your password to another individual including IT Support, a supervisor, or a coworker, promptly notify the CSO using one the following methods:
• Phone: (530) 339-7209
• Email: [email protected]
Reporting a cybersecurity incident can be done without fear or concern for retaliation.

Definitions

Active Directory – Microsoft’s proprietary directory service. A centralized database of user and computer accounts used for logging into computer systems.

Systems Processing Passwords – The computers or applications that will be accepting passwords from end-users. This includes workstations, servers, and computer programs.

Privileged Accounts – Accounts used for escalated rights on systems or applications. For example, administrator accounts or domain admin accounts.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) – Software that manages privileged access in a centralized database and monitors, detects, and helps prevent unauthorized privileged access to critical resources.

Service Accounts – Non-user accounts that are utilized to run a specific service, task, or function on a computer.

Recommendations for Creating Compliant Passwords

Use a passphrase rather than a password
• Choose a sentence, phrase, or series of random and unrelated words. • Use a passphrase that is easy to remember and has meaning to you.

Example Passphrases:
• Phrase: Heart filled with joy  Meets complexity requirements because it has more than 16 characters.

Packet Pg. 347
Attachment: ^Final Personnel Policy - Password Policy (4.15(a)-- Approval of New Personnel Password Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

Password Policy

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE

12/3/2024

5 • Series of random words: stack process overbid press  Meets complexity requirements because it has more than 16 characters.
• Sentence: When I was 5, I learned to ride a bike. Meets complexity requirements because it has more than 16 characters. The capital, lowercase, number “5”, and the special characters “,” and “.” help make this even more secure.

Packet Pg. 348
Attachment: ^Final Personnel Policy - Password Policy (4.15(a)-- Approval of New Personnel Password Policy)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Adopt Resolution terminating the Public Agency Retirement S ervices (PARS) Defined Contribution Retirement Enhancement Plan for Redding Peace Officers Association; and (2) Authorize the Personnel Director to complete the Notice of Termination informing PARS and U.S. Bank of the termination as Plan Administrator.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Redding Peace Officer s Association (RPOA) requested the creation of the Public Agency Retirement Services ( PARS) 401(a) deferred compensation plan in 2021; however, in 2023, this benefit was bargain ed away at the request of the unit and ratified by City Council (Council). This benefit was paid in totality by the enrolled RPOA members.

Alternative Action

The Council could decline to approve the resolution. This is not recommended as the Council previously agreed to terminate the plan during 2023 n egotiations with RPOA and PARS requires the City to terminate the plan via resolution of the Council.

Background/Analysis

In 2021, the City and RPOA agreed to the creation of a PARS 401(a) deferred compensation plan and to have employees in Tier 3 of the CalPERS retirement benefit contribute the difference between the CalPERS required contribution amount and 50 percent of the normal cost of retirement into the plan. The City was responsible to open and manage the account, but did not make any contributions into the plan.

MEETING DATE: December 3, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.15(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(b)--Resolution terminating the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) Defined Contr ibution Retirement Enhancement Plan for Redding Peace Officers Association (RPOA)
Kari Kibler, Personnel
Director
Packet Pg. 349
Report to Redding City Council November 26, 2024
Re: 4.15(b)--RPOA PARS Contract Amendment Page 2

In 2023, RPOA and the City agreed to terminate the PARS 401(a) deferred compensation plan during negotiations . The last employee contributions to the plan occurred through payroll on October 15, 2023. In order to officially terminate the plan, PARS requires the City Council to adopt a resolution terminating the plan as well as official written notice from the Plan Administrator, the City’s Personnel Director, informing PARS and U.S. Bank of the termination.

If the City Council takes the r ecommended actions, the Personnel Director will execute the PARS amendment ceasing the employee contributions pursuant to the agreement reached during 2023 negotiations and provide official written notice to PARS and U.S. Bank of the intent to terminate the agreement.

Once the plan is terminated, PARS will contact the affected employees and provide options for either receiving an immediate distribution of their account balance minus any taxes and penalties or rolling the funds into another qualifying account of their choice.

RPOA supports the termination of the plan as it aligns with the agreement reached during 2023 negotiations.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
^Resolution_Plan Termination
Draft Notice of Termination
PARS EE Contribution Ceasation Amendment
Packet Pg. 350

RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING AUTHORIZING

THE TERMINATION OF THE CITY OF REDDING PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT

SERVICES (PARS) DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT ENHANCEMENT PLAN

WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “Employer”) previously adopted the City of Redding PARS Defined Contribution Retirement Enhancement Plan (the “Plan”), amended and restated effective June 1, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the Employer has decided that it is in the best interest of the Employer and the Plan to terminate the Plan, and
WHEREAS, as of the date of Plan termination, all amounts credited to the Account of any affected Participant shall become one hundred percent (100%) vested; and WHEREAS, all Plan assets s hall be distributed to eligible Participants, as soon as administratively feasible following the Plan termination; and WHEREAS, the Plan shall be amended to include recent legislation and regulations applicable to qualified 401(a) defined contribution plans through the date of Plan termination; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 7.3 of the Plan, the Employer has the right to amend and terminate the Plan.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING:
(1) The Plan is hereby terminated effective December 3, 2024. (2) As of the effective date of the Plan termination , all amounts credited to the Account of any affected Participant shall become one hundred percent (100%) vested. (3) All Plan assets shall be distributed to Participants having an undistributed ba lance in the Plan, as soon as administratively feasible following the Plan termination. (4) The Personnel Director is hereby authorized to execute Plan amendments and documents, if any, and to do any and all acts that may be necessary in connection with the termination of the Plan. (5) Once all Plan assets have been distributed, PARS is removed as Trust Administrator, U.S. Bank N .A. is removed as Trustee, and John Hancock Retirement Services is removed as Custodian/Recordkeeper, and any and all agreements associated with the Plan shall be terminated.

I, Sharlene Tipton, Clerk of the City of Redding, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the council of said City held on the 3rd day of December, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

__________________________________

SHARLENE TIPTON , CITY CLERK
Packet Pg. 351
Attachment: ^Resolution_Plan Termination (4.15(b)--RPOA PARS Contract Amendment)

December 4, 2024
Mr. Daniel Johnson
President
Public Agency Retirement Services, PARS
4350 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 100
Newport Beach, CA 92660

Ms. Susan M. Hughes-Hill
Vice President/Regional Client Services Manager
U.S. Bank Institutional Trust & Custody
18300 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 500
Irvine, CA 92612

RE: City of Redding – Notice of the intent to Terminate the City of Redding PARS Defined Contribution Retirement Enhancement Plan

Dear Mr. Johnson and Ms. Hughes-Hill:

This letter shall serve as notification of the City of Redding’s (“Employer”) intent to terminate the City of Redding PARS Defined Contribution Retirement Enhancement Plan (“Plan”) adopted effective October 2, 2001. The Employer has decided that it is in the best interests of the Employer and the Plan to terminate the Plan and does not intend to use the Plan in the future.

In accordance with IRS rules and regulations, the above-referenced Plan is current for all legislation applicable to governmental defined contribution plans through the date of plan termination.

Once all Plan assets have been distributed, PARS is removed as Trust Administrator, U.S. Bank N.A. is removed as Trustee, and John Hancock Retirement Services is removed as Custodian/Recordkeeper, and any and all agreements associated with the Plan shall be terminated.

As Plan Administrator, I am authorized pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Trust Agreement and Section

7.3 of the Plan Document to ca rry out the tasks necessary to terminate the Employer’s Plan. PARS and U.S. Bank may rely on my authority and the statements in this letter with respect to the termination of the Plan.

Sincerely,

Kari Kibler
Personnel Director
[email protected]
(530) 225-4509
Packet Pg. 352
Attachment: Draft Notice of Termination (4.15(b)--RPOA PARS Contract Amendment)

AMENDMENT TO THE

CITY OF REDDING

PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT SERVICES (PARS)

RETIREMENT ENHANCEMENT PLAN

WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “Employer”) has adopted the City of Redding Public Agency Retirement S ervices (PARS) Retirement Enhancement Plan, a mended, and restated effective Ju ne 1, 20 21 (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Employer has reserved the rig ht to amend the Plan from time to t ime in accordance with Section 7.3 of the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Employer and the Redding Peace Officers Association (“RPOA”) Employee group have entered into agreement amending the terms and conditions of the contract an d memorandum of understanding to no longer require Employee contributions to be made to the Plan; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Plan is hereby amended effective December 3, 2024 as follows:

1. Article II, Section 2.2, Amount of Employee Contributions, is hereby amended in its entirety to read:

2.2 Amount of Employee Contributions
There is hereby created and established and shall be maintained by the Plan Administrator the Employee Contribution Account.

Effective in the pay period beginning on Ju ne 13, 2021, for each day that an Employee remains a Participant under this Plan, the Employee will make a mandatory contribution of one -quarter of one percent (0.25%) of Compensation to the Plan. Such amount shall be contributed to the Plan through bi-weekly payroll deductions.

Effective in the pay period beginning on September 5, 2021, for each day that an Employee remains a Participant under this Plan, the Employee will make a mandatory contribution of two and one - quarter percent (2.25%) of Compensation to the Plan. Such amount shall be contributed to the Plan through bi-weekly payroll deductions.

Effective in the pay period beginning on December 11, 2022, for each day that an Employee remains a Participant under this Plan, the Employee will make a mandat ory contribution of four and one - quarter percent (4.25%) of Compensation to the Plan. Such amount shall be contributed to the Plan through bi-weekly payroll deductions.

Effective in the pay period beginning on July 1 , 2023, for each day that an Employee re mains a Participant under this Plan, the Employee will make a mandatory contribution of three percent (3.00%) of Compensation to the Plan. Such amount shall be contributed to the Plan through bi - weekly payroll deductions.

Such contributions shall be made b efore the close of the Plan Year, or as soon as administratively practicable thereafter, and are subject to the limitation provisions of Section 2.7 of the Plan.

Employee contribution amounts shall be credited to the Employee Contribution Account and are subject to change at the discretion of the Employer.

Effective October 15, 2023, all mandatory Employee contributions shall cease.

2. All other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby adopted as of the date executed below.

City of Redding

By:

Kari Kibler
Packet Pg. 353
Attachment: PARS EE Contribution Ceasation Amendment (4.15(b)--RPOA PARS Contract Amendment)

AMENDMENT TO THE

CITY OF REDDING

PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT SERVICES (PARS)

RETIREMENT ENHANCEMENT PLAN

Its: Personnel Director

Dated:

Packet Pg. 354
Attachment: PARS EE Contribution Ceasation Amendment (4.15(b)--RPOA PARS Contract Amendment)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve and authorize the following:
(1) Authorize staff to publish a Request for Proposals for interim shelter services for unsheltered persons associated with Linden/Mercy Canyon and Progress/Technology/Breslaur encampments in an amount not to exceed $1,463,960 utilizing grant funds from the City of Redding’s Encampment Resolution Funding Program Round 3-Lookback funds;
(2) Find that publishing a Request for Proposals is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Fiscal Impact

The State of California Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency (BCSH) awarded Encampment Resolution Funding Program Round 3 Lookback (ERF-3-L) grant funds in the amount of $8,354,955 to the City of Redding (City) . The fund s are to assist persons associated with the Linden /Mercy Canyon area and the Technology/Progress/Breslauer area (Encampments) into interim shelter housing and supportive services.

Of the total award, $1,764,000 was specifically earmarked for i nterim housing in the BCSH Standard Agreement. Of that total, $1,4 63,960 is remaining and available for continued Interim Shelter services. Since ERF-3-L are grant funds, there is no impact to the City’s General Fund.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could choose not to provide approval for continued interim shelter services or may provide staff alternate direction . Alternative direction may require Council and BCSH approval, and could result in ERF-3-L funds being lost or reduced by the BCSH.

MEETING DATE: December 3, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.2(c)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(c)--Consider Authorizing Staff to Publish a Request for Proposals for Interim Shelter Services
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 355
Report to Redding City Council November 27, 2024
Re: 9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals Page 2

Background/Analysis

California Government Code Section 8698 (GC 8698) allows the governing body of a city to declare a Shelter Crisis when a significant number of persons are without the ability to obtain shelter, resulting in a threat to their health and sa fety. On June 15, 2021, Council adopted a resolution declaring that the City ha d a shelter crisis. Following this declaration, the Council approved two Ordinances (2637 and 2638), thereby amending Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Chapter 18.17.020 (Temporary U ses Exempt from Permits) and RMC Chapter 16.02.010 and Chapter 16.03.010 relating to establish ment of criteria for permitting and operating emergency housing sites during a declared Shelter Crisis. Each January 1st, pursuant to GC 8698, the City must report its actions and results of its efforts to alleviate the shelter crisis as described in its Shelter Crisis Action Plan (Action Plan).

The Action Plan provides guidance to staff in addressing homeless issues in our community.

Pursuant to the Action Plan , the City has assisted local nonprofits to set up three microshelter sites; Mark Street ( in operation since March 2023 ); Goodwater Crossing (enrolled guests in November 2024); and Veda Street Village (under construction and opening by the end of 2024).

In addition to the microshelters and by direction of Council , the City provides street outreach through the Redding Police Department’s Crisis Intervention Response Team, interim housing at motels, various Good News Rescue Mission rehabilitation and buildin g projects, a motel conversion, and other assistance to the unsheltered and at -risk community members through local nonprofits.

On November 21, 2023 and April 2, 2024 , Council appropriated ERF-3-grant funds for interim shelter and case management services. In addition, funding for a motel purchase was set-aside, in the event additional grant funding through the ERF program was received at a later date. On November 5, 2024, Council also approved the appropriation of a grant to Good News Rescue Mission for case management services.

On November 6, 2024, the City terminated its agreement with the vendor providing interim shelter beds at a local motel. In order to minimize the disruption to the interim shelter occupants, on November 12, 2024, the City Manage r signed a short-term agreement with Shasta Community Health Center to provide interim shelter assistance while also using Good News Rescue Mission case management services for those displaced from the motel. The short -term agreement ends in March 31, 2025 and an associated item increasing funding and duration of the agreement is an item on this Council Meeting’s Consent Calendar for consideration.

Should Council wish to continue providing interim shelter assistance to those associated with the encampments, longer-term provider /partnerships need to be obtained, utilizing the City’s Request for Proposals (RFP) process. If Council is supportive of staff publishing an RFP, staff will work with the BCSH to reallocate m otel purchase funds back into the interim shelter line item. As such, staff recommends utilizing the remaining $1,463,960 towards interim housing for the RFP. Funding these projects will assist staff to meet the metrics for the grant ; specifically, to provide 90 people with interim shelter opportunities.

Environmental Review

This is not a project as defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Packet Pg. 356
Report to Redding City Council November 27, 2024
Re: 9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals Page 3

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the oppor tunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and a ttract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”

Attachments
^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft
April 2, 2024 Staff Report - Appropriate Encampment 3-L Funding Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report
Shelter Crisis Action Plan
Packet Pg. 357

0 Housing Division

December 4, 2024

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

ENCAMPMENT EMERGENCY SHELTER PROGRAM

HOUSING DIVISION OF THE CITY OF REDDING,

CALIFORNIA

On behalf of the Housing Division of the City of Redding and in accordance with the provisions of the City of Redding’s Procurement Manual and the City of Redding Municipal Code, sealed proposals must be submitted to Laura McDuffey in care of the City of Redding Housing Division, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, First Floor, Redding, California 96001 prior to 3:00 p.m. PDT on Friday December 20 2024.

THE HOUSING DIVISION OF THE CITY OF REDDING RESERVES THE RIGHT TO

REJECT, AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION, PROPOSALS RECEIVED AFTER THIS TIME AND DATE.

The proposals will be opened at 8:30 a.m. PDT on Monday December 23, 2024 in the Redding City Hall , Garden Tract Conference Room as posted in the main lobby of Redding City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.

The proposer shall provide the original (unbound) proposal, along with two copies.

The cut-off date and time for receiving questions regarding this proposal is 2:00 p.m. PDT, on Wednesday December 11, 2024. All inquiries must be made in writing and may be submitted to the email address shown below.

THE CITY OF REDDING
Purchasing Division

Name
Email

Packet Pg. 358
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals)

NOTE
If a potential bidder/proposer received this solicitation document through some means other than surface mail from the City of Redding (such as from the City of Redding Internet web site, or from another prospective bidder/proposer), it is the responsibility of the potential bidder/proposer to advise the assigned City of Redding Purchasing contact of its intention to submit a bid/proposal so that any addenda or other correspondence related to this solicitation will be sent to the potential bidder/proposer. When contacting the Purchasing Division, the bidder/proposer shall provide the solicitation number located on the cover page of this document. Transmittal of this information must be in writing, by U.S. Mail, fax, or e-mail. Transmittal of this information via telephone is not acceptable.

Please submit bid/proposal as directed in the RFP package. Forward to:

Housing
c/o City of Redding City Clerk
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001

Proposals must be received by the City Clerk’s office prior to 3:00 p.m.

PDT on the date indicated below. Mailing envelope is to be clearly marked on the outside with the following notation:

“Proposal for Housing Division Schedule No. XX; opening at 3:00 P.M., on Friday, December 20, 2024”

Note: Signatures must be legible, indicating full first and last name.

The City of
Redding
Purchasing
Division

Packet Pg. 359
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals)

HOUSING DIVISION OF THE CITY OF REDDING
777 CYPRESS AVENUE
REDDING, CA 96001

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Encampment Emergency Shelter Program

HOUSING DIVISION SCHEDULE NUMBER:X
ISSUED:

PROPOSAL DUE: DECEMBER 20, 2024

Project Manager: Laura McDuffey, Senior Housing Specialist, Housing email : [email protected]

Purchasing Officer: Michelle Kempley, Purchasing Officer, City of Redding email: [email protected]
Packet Pg. 360
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) 4 Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 4

1.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 4

1.2 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 4

1.3 Overall Project Objectives ............................................................................................ 5

2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ..................................................................................................... 5

2.1 Project Scope of Work .................................................................................................. 5

2.2 Administration .............................................................................................................. 5

2.3 Expectations of Contracted Provider ............................................................................ 6

2.4 Performance Measurement ........................................................................................... 6

3.0 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL AND FORMAT REQUIREMENTS................................. 7

3.1 Proposal Submittal ........................................................................................................ 7

3.2 Proposal Format ............................................................................................................ 7 A. Transmittal Letter ............................................................................................................ 7 B. Statement of Team Qualifications ................................................................................... 8 C. Project Approach ............................................................................................................. 8 D. Project Schedule and Milestones..................................................................................... 9 E. Project Budget ................................................................................................................. 9

4.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION ............................................................................................ 9

5.0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ................................................................................... 10

5.1 RFP Schedule (Subject to Change) ............................................................................ 10

5.2 Contract Term ............................................................................................................. 10

5.3 Clarifications .............................................................................................................. 10

5.4 Proposal Public Information ....................................................................................... 11

5.5 RFP Addenda .............................................................................................................. 11

5.6 Proposal Preparation Costs ......................................................................................... 11

5.7 Withdrawal of Proposals ............................................................................................ 11

5.8 Selection, Negotiation, and Award ............................................................................. 11

5.9 Right to Reject Proposals ........................................................................................... 12

5.10 Equal Employment Opportunity Requirements ......................................................... 12

Packet Pg. 361
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Redding’s (City) Housing Division is pleased to request proposals from qualified Provider organizations to work in conjunction with the Crisis Intervention Response Team (CIRT) to help shelter people who are homeless and have lived in the Linden Canyon or Progress/Technology Way encampments.

The successful Provider is expected to be awarded at the January 7, 2025 Redding City Council meeting. Submitted proposals must include a proposed budget, timeline, and a detailed plan to meet Project expectations. Providers responding to the Request for Proposals (RFP) must provide all necessary resources to ensure the Project is established and open for operation within an agreed-upon Project delivery schedule.

Interested Providers are required to su bmit qualifications in accordance with the requirements of the RFP.

The Redding Housing Division reserves the right to request that Providers submit additional information to Housing Division staff at any time . The Housing Division also reserves the right to suspend, amend, or modify this RFP's provisions, reject any and all proposals, negotiate modifications of proposals, or award less than the available or requested funding.

1.1 Background
The Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF) Program (Program) was established to increase collaboration between the California InterProvider Council on Homelessness (Cal ICH), local jurisdictions, and Continuums of Care. Projects must focus on improving the experience of unsheltered people residing in encampments by addressing safety and wellness issues of people within encampments and transitioning individuals into interim shelter with clear pathways to permanent housing or directly into permanent housing. Projects must use data-informed, non-punitive, low-barrier, person-centered, Housing First philosophies, and coordinated approaches. The City of Redding was awarded Encampment Resolution Funding ( ERF 3 -L) funds to complete this Project. More information about the ERF 3 -L program is available on Cal ICH’s website: Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF) Program | California Department of Housing and Community Development

Summary
The Housing Division is seeking a qualified Provider to provide emergency shelter to homeless persons associated with the Linden Canyon or Progress/Technology Way encampments. The Project will work in conjunction with the City’s CIRT and The Good News Res cue Mission’s (GNRM) Encampment 3 -L (ERF-3-L) Case Management Project.

Overall Project Objectives
The overall goal of the Project is to provide immediate shelter for people who are literally homeless (per HUD definition here:
https://www.hudexchange.info/homelessness-assistance/coc-esg-virtual-binders/coc- Packet Pg. 362
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) 6 esg-homeless-eligibility/four-categories/category-1/ ) and to assist with the overall ERF 3-L goal to connect 50 people to permanent housing over 24 months.

2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

2.1 Project Scope of Work
The Encampment 3-L Project will provide funding for the cost of shelter beds located at motels within the City of Redding. In conjunction with Case Mangement Services Provided by the GNRM, the Provider will o perate the Project including providing emergency shelter for eligible individuals . I ndividuals will be connected to the GNRM Case Management Project to obtain resources and options for transitional or permanent housing. Provider will be required to master lease motel rooms with the motel owner. The motel owner will operate the motel as if the participants are motel guests, providing all of the normal and customary motel services . The motel owner will be responsible for maintenance and normal motel operations such as room cleaning, linens, pest control and overall health and safety of the motel. Components of this program should include:

a. Accept referrals first through the CIRT Outreach Team and ERF Case Managers; if no referrals are contemplated from these two sources, the Provider may receive referrals from other community providers and focus on clients associated with the Linden Canyon or Progress/Technology Way encampments. b. Coordinate with other funding sources that could provide additional emergency shelter and other support.
c. Develop a motel room program, wherin arrangements would be made in advance with a motel provider in exchange for providing rooms at a reasonable rate for households participating in this program . Rooms should be negoti ated for a fixed time stay such as weekly or monthly.
d. Motel rooms will have a maximum stay of ten (10) months. e. Build relationships with motel owners to resolve potential conflicts with program households as they arise.
f. The motel shall furnish normal and standard motel operations such as:
i. Sewer, trash disposal, and water service both hot and cold ii. Electricity and/or gas necessary to provider power for heating, ventilating and air conditioning
iii. Linen/terry cloth and laundry services
iv. Standard motel housekeeping/janitorial services weekly v. Toiletries including shampoo, conditioner, soap, toilet paper and tissues vi. Pest control for any pests that may negatively affect the health, safety and peaceful enjoyment of the Project by participants.
g. Collaborate with exisiting Encampment Case Management provider s for housing case management services; including direct assistance to participants. h. Collect data and information as required by the City including enrolling clients into the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS). i. The City will not consider costs for motel damage claims Packet Pg. 363
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) 7 2.2 Administration
Up to 5 percent of ERF Program costs throughout the grant period may be used for indirect costs. Indirect costs may include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Executive director salary and benefits
b. General organization insurance
c. Organization-wide audits
d. HMIS data expenses
e. General Provider facilities costs (including those associated with executive positions) such as rent, depreciation expenses, and operations and maintenance.

All amounts billed to administration must be supported by actual cost s. Backup documentation will be required with monthly invoicing.

2.3 Expectations of Contracted Provider
The successful Provider’s Project will exhibit the following attributes:
a. Collaborative Approach - the provider(s) must have the ability to build and maintain strong and effective working partnerships with homeless service providers, housing providers, and landlords.
b. Communication – staff must have the ability to communicate with people experiencing homelessness, service providers, and the public. c. Objectivity – successful operation requires that the provider use consistency and fairness when applying all policies, procedures, and tools. d. Problem-Solving – the program provider must embrace a problem -solving approach to ending homelessness. To be effective, the provider must employ staff who ar e skilled at problem -solving and understand how to adopt a trauma - informed, strengths-based, and client-centered approach to all aspects of service delivery.
e. Housing First – the organizational mission and philosophy of the provider must be aligned with Hou sing First principles: everyone is housing ready , and there should be minimal barriers or service participation requirements imposed on homeless people as a condition for entering housing.
f. Voluntary Services - Programs must not terminate or deny services to households based on a refusal to participate in supportive services. Supportive services are helping or educational resources that include support groups, mental health services, alcohol and substance abuse services, life skills or independent living skills services, vocational services, and social activities. These services will be provided by the GNRM Case Management Project unless otherwise coordinated. g. Data-informed – the data collected will be used for ongoing and continuous system improvement. The provider must be firmly committed to data quality and willing to make data-informed decisions. Data must be entered in to the HMIS accurately, and on an ongoing basis.

2.4 Performance Measurement
The Project will be monitored frequently using internal evaluations, data verification Packet Pg. 364
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) 8 and field monitoring.

The successful Provider will:
a. Utilize an HMIS Emergency Shelter program for participants. b. Provide adequate records of placements into the motel including room numbers, entry and exit dates, destinations of clients when they exit the hotel, and any incident reports.
c. Submit monthly data reports to the City of Redding with additional reports and data as requested by Housing.
d. Receive periodic monitoring and evaluation by Housing.

3.0 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL AND FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Proposal Submittal
City of Redding Housing Division will accept proposals until Friday December 20, at 2:00 p.m. (PDT). Housing Division reserves the right to reject, at its sole discretion, proposals received after this date and time.

The proposer shall provide the original (unbound) proposal, along with two copies. Proposals will be submitted to t he Housing Division Office located at 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The Housing office is open Monday – Friday from 9:00 am – 2:00 pm.

3.2 Proposal Format
The following information constitutes the “Proposal”. Respondents must provide proposal information (e.g., organize their proposals) using the same lettered sequence as below, with labeled/lettered tabs to separate sections. A review committee will evaluate the completeness of the response to the RFP.

A. Transmittal Letter
The letter shall highlight the proposer’s understanding of the pr oject and include the following general information:

• Proposer name, address, telephone number, contact person, email, and reason your organization should be selected for this work.
• Specify the type of organization (individual, partnership, or corporation) and, if applicable, indicate if the proposer is a:

1. Small Business

2. Minority and/or Women-Owned Business
• Team composition:

1. Identify members of the team who will work on the project and indicate who will be the project manager with their contact information. • Provide an organizational chart of the team composition. • Acknowledgement of receipt of any addenda issued to the RFP.

Packet Pg. 365
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) 9 If any Provider’s key personnel change during the project, the Provider shall notify the Housing Division immediately.

The letter must contain a statement certifying that the proposer has the capacity and available staff to complete the project. The statement shall also indicate that the proposal is valid for 90 days and shall be signed by an official authorized to both bind the proposer to the statement and enter into contracts on behalf of the proposer. Any additional proposers shall sign additional statements if a partnership submits the proposal.

B. Statement of Team Qualifications
Summarize the skills and experience directly related to the Project's scope of work.

Resumes should not substitute for a written outline of relevant experience and can be included in an appendix if desired.

1. Staff Qualifications
This section should demonstrate the qualifications of all personnel to be assigned to this project by describing their education, credentials, experience relevant to street outreach and homeless services, and proposed roles for this contract.

2. Related Experience

Include descriptive information concerning the experience of the Provider, especially the identified project manager. Include information about previous projects that might be comparable, including the size (budget or other indicators) , types of emergency shelter projects, the scope of services provided (as they compare to this Project), and relevant data and statistics highlighting similar projects over the past three years.

List the projects in reverse chronological order and provide the following information for each project:

• Project name and location
• Nature of work performed
• Level of responsibility for project manager, task leader, or subcontractor • Name of the contact person and telephone number at the time the project was completed
• Time span (start and end of project assignment)

C. Project Approach
Summarize your approach to designing, implementing, and operating an emergency shelter programs and any special considerations the Housing Division should be aware of. Proposals should respond with specific details about how each of the listed elements of the Project will be addressed.

The description must indicate:

Packet Pg. 366
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) 10 • Program philosophy and methodology
• Program management
• Staffing levels, including job descriptions of personnel planned for the programs • Anticipated partnerships with other community providers. • HMIS experience and history
• Program evaluation methods

D. Project Schedule and Milestones
Include a document with the start and end months. The Provider should develop the optimal sequencing and timing of the various tasks in the written proposal.

E. Project Budget
The Housing Division may award to up to three (3) providers for this project with the award averaging $500,000.

Funding for this contract is available for motel rooms including standard motel services such as laundry services (including personal laundry), bedding, linens, and hygiene items. One motel room must be included in the contract for an on -site staff office. Funding is not available for food or room damage.

• Proposers should review the requirements of this RFP and address all services that might reasonably be expected to support the Project. • The Project budget should be itemized by the cost per room and per person; Express how many people can receive shelter at a given time; and provide a breakdown of overhead costs by item.

4.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION
The Housing Division will determine the selected Project based on information provided in the proposals and any subsequent interviews that may be conducted. Housing Division does not guarantee that interviews will take place; as such, proposals should include all required information, be clear, be concise, and stand on their own for evaluation.

Upon receipt of the proposals, the Housing Division shall review and evaluate the proposals for responsiveness to the RFP to determine whether proposers possess the qualifications necessary to provide the required services. The Housing Division may request clarifications of proposals directly from the proposers.

In reviewing the proposals and negotiating with selected proposers, the Housing Division reserves the right to reject all proposals. The Housing Division may negotiate directly with qualified proposers and may request a final best offer from one or more proposers.

A review committee of three City Staff will evaluate the proposals based on scoring criteria, to include the following:

• The applicant’s approach, the scope of work, recommended schedules, suggested Packet Pg. 367
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) 11 responsibility assignments, and staffing levels.
• Qualifications and experience in providing services in street outreach with the homeless and similar assistance with emergency shelter, as exemplified by past projects. • Knowledge of and experience in implementing and operating homeless programs. • Experience and ability to form partnerships with other providers serving homeless clients. • Project total budget.

Submitted proposals will be evaluated using the criteria established below.

CATEGORY MAX
POINTS
Project Approach 20
Emergency Shelter Qualifications 20
Experience Implementing Homeless Programs 20
Partnerships 20
Pricing 20

The Housing Division shall make the final determination of the most qualified applicant with which to negotiate a contract. The review committee will evaluate and score proposals in accordance with the scoring criteria outlined in the RFP. Before the final selection, the review committee may select a shortlist and interview prospective applicants and/or may require the submittal of further documentation regarding the applicant’s capabilities and qualifications. Dates and times for those interviews are to be determined. The City of Redding will issue the agreement. Successful applicants may be subject to a background check to include a credit check and/or professional references.

5.0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

5.1 RFP Schedule (Subject to Change)

EVENT DATE
Release of RFP December 4, 2024
RFP Questions Due December 11, 2024
RFP Answers Provided December 13, 2024
Proposals Due December 20, 2024, 2:00 p.m.

Proposals Evaluated and Interviews (If Needed) December 2024 Announcement of awarded proposals January 2025
Contract Begins January 2025
The Housing Division reserves the right to award contracts solely based on proposal content.

5.2 Contract Term
The duration of the contract will be a minimum of six (6) months from the date of execution. Based on performance of contract, an extension may be considered.

Packet Pg. 368
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) 12 5.3 Clarifications
Any questions, requests for additional information, or requests for clarification regarding this request for proposals will be accepted via e -mail by Laura McDuffey at [email protected] until 2:00 p.m. May 21, 2024. Answers to any questions recei ved will be posted as an FAQ Document by December 3, 2024.

5.4 Proposal Public Information
All responses become the property of the Housing Division . All responses, including the accepted proposal and any subsequent contract, become public records per the requirements of state public records laws. Proprietary material must be clearly marked as such. Pricing and service elements of the successful proposal are not considered proprietary information.

The Housing Division will treat all information submitted in a proposal as available for public inspection including City Council once the Housing Division has selected a n Provider. If you believe that you have a legally justifiable basis for protecting the confidentiality of any information contained within the proposal, you must identify any such information, together with the legal basis of your claim in the proposal, and present such information separately as part of your response package. This portion of the submittal must be clearly marked “Confidential.”

The final determination as to whether the Housing Division will assert the claim of confidentiality on your behalf shall be at the sole discretion of the Housing Division . If the Housing Division decides that the information does not meet the criteria for confidentiality, you will be notified. Any information deemed to be non-confidential shall be considered a public record.

5.5 RFP Addenda
The Housing Division reserves the right to amend, alter, or revoke this RFP in any manner at any time.

At its sole discretion, the Housing Division will distribute modifications, clarifications, or additions to this RFP as an addendum to all known prospective proposers. Proposers shall be responsible for acquiring and acknowledging all addenda, should any be issued. Failure to do so shall not relieve any proposer from any obligation under its proposal, as submitted or under the RFP, as clarified, interpreted, or modified. All addenda issued shall become part of this RFP.

5.6 Proposal Preparation Costs
The proposer shall wholly absorb all costs incurred in the preparation and presentation of this proposal.

5.7 Withdrawal of Proposals
Any proposer may withdraw their proposal, either personally or by written request, at any time prior to the proposal's due date/time. Such requests are to be directed to the Housing Division office.

5.8 Selection, Negotiation, and Award
The Housing Division shall award a contract to the responsible proposer whose proposal is most advantageous to the Housing Division, i.e., the “best value.” The Housing Division reserves its right to award to other than the lowest price proposal.

Packet Pg. 369
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) 13 Through the proposal evaluation, the Housing Division will select an Provider. The selected Provider shall execute a contract with the Housing Division within 30 calendar days after notification of selection unless the time for execution has been extended for good cause at the sole discretion of the Housing Division. Failure of the selected Provider to meet contract submission requirements (e.g., insurance), negotiate, or timely execute a contract with the Housing Division may result, at the sole discretion of the Housing Division, in a decision to select from the remaining proposers or to call for new proposals. The selected Provider will be presented at a City Council meeting (anticipated date of January 7, 2025), and authorization to award the contract will be requested.

If the Housing Division and the selected Provider fail to finalize the scope of work and cost or fail to negotiate a contract, the Housing Division will reject the selected proposer’s proposal. In the event of rejection, the proposer shall have no right to reimbursement for costs incurred by the proposer in connection with any work and negotiations. The Housing Division will then select another proposer the staff believes will provide the best value, qualifications, and work and negotiate with that proposer.

The Housing Division will negotiate and execute a contract with the selected Provider. The Housing Division reserves the right to award the project to any Provider whose proposal is most advantageous to the Housing Division, in accordance with the scoring criteria set forth in the RFP, and to reject any and all proposals.

The Housing Division reserves the right to award any number of contracts it deems necessary to achieve success. This RFP does not commit the Housing Division to award a contract. The Housing Division reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals. If the Housing Division decides to award, the contract will be sent to the proposer for signature. No proposal shal l be binding upon the Housing Division until after a contract is executed by duly authorized representatives of the Housing Division and the selected Provider. No minimum amount of work is implied or guaranteed under the contract.

The Housing Division reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice. The Housing Division makes no representations that any contract will be awarded to any proposer responding to this RFP.

5.9 Right to Reject Proposals
The Housing Division reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to waive any non -material irregularities or information in any proposal, and to accept or reject any combination of items.

5.10 Equal Employment Opportunity Requirements
Each Provider must agree that it will not discriminate in hiring, promotion, treatment, or other terms and conditions of employment based on race, sex, gender identity, national origin, age, disability, or in any way violate Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and a mendments, except as permitted by said laws.

Packet Pg. 370
Attachment: ^Interim Shelter Project RFP - Draft (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve and authorize the following actions concerning the Encampment Resolution Funding Lookback Disbursement 3-L Program:
(1) Authorize the City Manager, or designee , to appropriate $30,000 for intermittent motel stays that assist the Crisis Intervention Response Team; (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to appropriate up to $725,000 to No Boundaries Transitional Housing, Inc.; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to negotiate and execute a funding agreement through June 2025;
(3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to appropriate $45,000 to support the Good News Rescue Mission’s temporary day resource center;
(4) Receive results from a case management survey completed by local community organizations; and direct staff to prepare and publish a Requ est for Proposals for case management services that assist the Crisis Intervention Response Team; (5) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to apply for grant funds from the Encampment Resolution Funding Round 3, Rolling Application; and
(6) Find that appropri ating grant funds is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.

Fiscal Impact

The Encampment Resolution Lookback Disbursement Funding (ERF -3-L) provides $8,354,955 in grant funds to the City of Redding (City) as detailed in the California Department General Services – Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency (BCSH) Standard Agreement.

Any future funds received from the Encampment Resolution Funding Program Round 3, Rolling Application (ERF-3-R) are also grant funds and do not require matching funds.

There is no impact to the General Fund.

MEETING DATE: April 2, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.2(c)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(c)--Consider appropriation of Encampment Resolution Funding 3-L Award.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 371
Attachment: April 2, 2024 Staff Report - Appropriate Encampment 3-L Funding (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Report to Redding City Council March 28, 2024
Re: 9.2(c)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF) 3-L Award Page 2

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could choose not to provide approval of the appropriation requests or provide staff alternate direction. Any alternative direction with regard to funding allocations would require Council and BCSH approval, an d may result in ERF -3-L funds being lost or reduced by the BCSH.

Background/Analysis

On February 21, 2023, Council authorized and approved staff to submit a grant a pplication through the BCSH for the ERF -3-L Program . On September 21, 2023, a Standard Agreement detailing the budget, scope of work, and terms and conditions of the $8,354,955 funding award was executed. The ERF -3-L grant’s intent is to provide outreach, supportive services and connection to shelter for those living in the Linden/Mercy Canyon, Progress/Technology Way Encampments (Encampments).

On November 21, 2023, Council approved the appropriation of the grant award and provided direction on various line items of the ERF 3-L budget that included: Crisis Intervention Response Team (CIRT) officers; case managers; street outreach; housing; day resource center; Good News Rescue Mission rehabilitation project; and City staff costs. Of those categories, staff was directed to research housing case management and motel purchases and return to the Council with additional information.

Housing staff conducted a case management survey , with the results attached, to determine the capacity of case management organiza tions to assist persons residing in encampments . The survey was sent out to the NorCal Continuum of Care – Shasta Advisory Board. Responses were received from nine organizations. Four organizations indicated they do not provide services to persons living i n encampments. Three of the nine serve special populations. One organization noted they have a waitlist of over 100 people waiting for case management services. Others note that they do not keep a waitlist, but use Coordinated Entry for any new openings in their programs. Of the nine, two stated they have capacity to provide case management for encampments, and two others indicated no capacity, but were willing to expand.

Based on information received from the survey, staff recommends releasing a request for proposals for case management services to assist CIRT with meeting its goals of serving 200 homeless persons, including transitioning 90 persons into emergency shelter and 50 persons into permanent housing by March 2027.

With regard to motel purchase s, staff communicated with three motel owners who expressed interest in selling their motels. All respondents favored a full cash sale over possible owner -will- carry scenarios . Staff believes that although purchasing a motel is a better long -term goal, funding shelter rooms right now is the best choice, at least until capital can be raised to purchase a motel outright . As a way to obtain additional funding for a motel purchase, staff intends to pursue ERF-3-R funds through the current notice of funding avai lability application due April 30, 2024.

In the meantime, staff recommends u tilizing $755,000 of the $1,764,000 in ERF-3-L Interim Housing line item funds , to partially fund CIRT’s intermittent motel stays for specific encampment residents in emergency s ituations ($30,000), as well as to provide $725,000 of funding toward the No Boundaries project through June 202 5. Currently the No Boundaries Packet Pg. 372
Attachment: April 2, 2024 Staff Report - Appropriate Encampment 3-L Funding (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Report to Redding City Council March 28, 2024
Re: 9.2(c)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF) 3-L Award Page 3

subsidy provides funding for approximately 66 rooms through June 2024. If Council approves the $725,000 funding r equest, the funding will allow approximately 40 rooms to be occupied from June 2024 through June 2025 for ERF -3-L participants. F unding these projects will assist staff to meet the metrics for the grant ; specifically, to provide 90 people with emergency s helter rooms.

In November 2023, the Good News Rescue Mission (GNRM) requested $157,000 to fund two case managers to support a temporary Day Resource Center in the GNRM’s current chapel/cafeteria building. Council funded $112,000 of the request through th e Housing and Homelessness Incentive Program (HHIP) . Staff is requesting that the $45,000 difference between the cost of the project and the appropriated HHIP funds be funded with ERF -3-L funds re-directed from the ERF -3-L Sanitation Support line item app roved at the December 19, 2023 Council meeting. The appropriation of the ERF -3-L funds will fully support the GNRM’s total temporary Day Resource Center request.

Environmental Review

This is not a project as defined under California Environmental Quali ty Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

• Public Safety – “Work to improve all asp ects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”

Attachments
^Case Management Survey Results
Packet Pg. 373
Attachment: April 2, 2024 Staff Report - Appropriate Encampment 3-L Funding (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 23rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023 -060 appropriating $8,354,960 of Encampment Resolution Funding Lookback Disbursement Round 3 (ERF-3-L) funds and adding a fu ll-time, Housing Specialist I/II position to the Housing Division;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate a Development Funding Agreement with the Good News Rescue Mission for maintenance improvements in an amount not to exceed $500,000;
(3) Direct staff to prepare a request for proposals for eligible scope of work items as identified on the attached Grant Expenditure S ummary which includes housing case managers; interim housing/motel room partnerships; day resource center purchase; and day resource center di rector and case manager; and prioritize the release of each request for proposal; and
(4) Determine that allocating grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Fiscal Impact

The Encampment Resolution Lookback Disbursement Funding (ERF-3-L) provides $8,354,955 in grant funds to the City of Redding (City) as detailed in the California Department General Services – Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency (BCSH) Standard Agreement .

Administration and activity delivery costs of $ 473,455 will assist in funding associated staff contract administration costs and an additional staff person . There is no impact to the General Fund, and the ERF-3-L grant does not require matching funds.

MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 9.2(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF) 3-L Award Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 174Packet Pg. 374
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Report to Redding City Council November 15, 2023
Re: 9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award Page 2

Alternative Action

The Cit y Council (Council) could choose not to give staff direction to prepare Request for Proposals (RFPs) and staff would work within the Standard Agreement and funding guidelines to implement the ERF-3-L funds. Or, Council could provide alternate direction to staff. If Council redirects funds within categories or changes a category, ERF -3-L funds may be lost or reduced by the BCSH.

Background/Analysis

On February 21, 2023, Council authorized and approved Housing Division staff to submit a grant application through the BCSH for the ERF -3-L Program. The City’s initial application was denied. However, staff revised the application with a focus on a cohesive project that provided support services to specific encampments connected to a day resource center and was awarded $8,354,955 in ERF-3-L grant funds.

On September 21, 2023 , a Standard Agreement detailing the budget, scope of work , and terms and conditions of the funding was executed. The ERF-3-L grant’s intent is to provide outreach, supportive services and connection to shelter for those living i n the Linden/Mercy Canyon , Progress/Technology Way Encampments (Encampments) or the Good News Rescue Mission area.

As proposed in the grant application, t he City’s primary means of providing outreach and services is through the Crisis Intervention Response Team (CIRT) officers, coupled with housing case manage r services. The case managers will assist CIRT in their efforts and provide more intensive services by connecting unsheltered persons to shelter and housing options along with other community resources such as employment options, public benefits, medical or dental care or drug and alcohol abuse rehabilitation. In addition, the grant will fund sanitation support for the encampments and case managers with housi ng placement support assistance that includes:
deposits, application fees, and furnishings for no more than 50 people.

ERF-3-L funding also specifically provides for maintenance improvements to the Good News Rescue Mission (GNRM) . These maintenance needs include a new roof, kitchen upgrade and remodel, laundry and privacy screening improvements , if the budget allows . The City Manager and s taff will work with the GNRM to determine the full scope of the maintenance improvements and will negotiate a deve lopment funding agreement to set forth the terms and conditions of the grant funding and GNRM project.

Lastly, t he ERF-3-L award includes funding for specific categories that include: interim housing/motel room partnerships; day resource center purchase and rehabilitation ; and a day resource center director and case manager to support the center for the first three years of operation. At the Council’s discretion, each one of these categories can be the subject of a request for proposal that can be draft ed by staff and reviewed and approved by the Council and/or the City Manager – ERF-3-L funding allows either path for selection.

Over the last year, the City has strived to provide leadership surrounding the unsheltered crisis in our community. As such, staff has diligiently competed for grants to help the community assist this vulnerable population, but with more grants, comes more workload and responsibility. The Housing Division’s goal is to continue its level of service to the community while also p roviding Packet Pg. 175Packet Pg. 375
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Report to Redding City Council November 15, 2023
Re: 9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award Page 3

succession planning for three possible staff retirements within the next two years . As such, additional staff is needed to support the Housing Division’s projects, programs, and goals . Staff requests the addition of one, full-time Housing Speciali st position to assist with the day -to-day administration of the Encampment grant award. With the addition of this position, the Housing Division will have 20 positions, consisting of 19.5 full-time and one ½ time employees.

Environmental Review

This is n ot a project as defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. A National Environmental Policy Act review is not necessary as these are State of California and not Federal funds.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
^Budget Resolution
^Grant Expenditure Summary
Standard Agreement (C-10048)
Packet Pg. 176Packet Pg. 376
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 377
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 378
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 379
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 380
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 381
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 382
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 383
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 384
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 385
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 386
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 387
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 388
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 389
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 390
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 391
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 392
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 393
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 394
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 395
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 396
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 397
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 398
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 399
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 400
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 401
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 402
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 403
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) Packet Pg. 404
Attachment: Nov. 21, 2023 Staff Report (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) CITY OF REDDING
SHELTER CRISIS ACTION PLAN

California Government Code Section 8698, et seq., allows the governing body of a city to declare a Shelter Crisis when a significant number of persons are without the ability to obtain shelter, resulting in a threat to their health and safety.

The  2020  Shasta  County  Point‐in‐Time  Report  provided that  four  hundred  fifty‐four  (454)
individuals within the City of Redding “(“City”), including veterans, women, children, individuals with  disabilities,  senior  citizens,  and  other  vulnerable  groups,  are  experiencing  unsheltered homelessness within the City. Many of those unable to obtain shelter reside on the streets, in alleys  and  doorways,  along  the  Sacramento  River  and  its  tributaries,  and  in  unlawful encampments throughout the City. These individuals lack adequate sanitary facilities and are at risk from theft, crime, and extreme weather conditions, these conditions threaten the health and safety of the unsheltered population and likewise threaten the public health and safety of the public at large, contribute to a draw on public resources, and threaten the environmental health of the City’s waterways.

In  June  2021,  the  City  Council  adopted  a  resolution  declaring  that  the  City  of  Redding  has  a shelter crisis.  A shelter crisis proclaims that a significant number of people are without the ability to obtain shelter.   Following this declaration, the Council approved two Ordinances (2637 and 2638)  thereby  amending  Redding  Municipal  Code  (RMC)  Title  18  (Zoning),  Chapter  18.17, subsection 18.17.020 (Temporary Uses Exempt from Permits) and RMC Title 16, Chapter 16.02, subsection  16.02.010  and  Chapter  16.03,  subsection  16.03.010  relating  to  establishing  the criteria for permitting emergency housing sites and the operation of the same during a declared Shelter Crisis.

With  the  declaration  of  a  shelter  crisis  and  the  City  enacting  the  provisions  of  RMC  Section

18.17.020 and portions of Title 16, these actions allow organizations within the City to request permits issued by the City Council to set up and operate an Emergency Housing Site as defined in the RMC and in Appendix O of the California Building Code.   The Emergency Housing Sites will provide low barrier, sanitary shelter for up to 10 months, for those experiencing homelessness.

Wrap‐around supportive services will be provided to the occupants of the Emergency Housing Sites with the goal of moving those individuals into permanent housing.

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 8698 and RMC Chapter 18.17.020, subsection M., 14, the City Manager shall, not later than July 1st of the year following the declaration of any  shelter  crisis,  develop  a  plan  to  address  the  shelter  crisis  which  shall  include  the development  of  homeless  shelters  and  permanent  supportive  housing  as  well  as  onsite supportive services.

The implementation of Emergency Housing Sites within the City of Redding provides a resource to address the crisis of the unsheltered by
creating housing facilities offering short‐term shelter bridging the gap to transitional or permanent housing.   Considering Emergency Housing Sites Packet Pg. 405
Attachment: Shelter Crisis Action Plan (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) will  play  an  important  role  in  addressing  unsheltered  needs  within  our  community,  staff developed the following Action Plan:

I. DEVELOP CITY INTERNAL PROCESS
a. City Manager’s Office – Program Administration
i. Application Process
ii. City Property Analysis
iii. Emergency Housing Site Permit Approval
iv. Communicate Progress to City Council and Community

b. Emergency Sleeping Cabin Approval
i. Building Official
ii. Fire Marshal
iii. Pallet
iv. CHYBA
c. Site Development
i. Permit Process Checklist
ii. Internal Team (Development Services, Fire, Public Works, REU, Housing and RPD)
d. Operations and Services Plan
i. Administrative Guidelines
ii. Guide, Advise and Monitor Operations and Services Plans iii. Collect Annual Report from each Emergency Housing Site

II. BUILD CAPACITY AND PARTNERSHIPS
a. Identify Funding Resources
b. Establish Partnerships
i. Non‐Profits (St. James, GNRM, United Way)
ii. CIRT
iii. Support Services
iv. Continuum of Care
c. Collect Data
d. Seek new capital and service funding opportunities

III. HOUSING RESOURCES
a. Emergency
i. City Property
ii. Private Property
b. Transitional
i. Participate with the Housing Inventory Count and identify available bed within our community.
ii. Facilitate partnerships that improve the number of beds available in our community.

Packet Pg. 406
Attachment: Shelter Crisis Action Plan (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals) c. Permanent
i. Tax Credit Developments
ii. CDBG‐DR‐MHP
iii. Pursue other federal and state funding sources.

IV.   REGULATORY/LEGISLATIVE
a. Annual Report
i. The  total  number  of  residents  in  homeless  shelters  within  the  city, county, or city and county.
ii. The total number of residents who have moved from a homeless shelter into permanent supportive housing within the city, county, or city and county.
iii. The estimated number of permanent supportive housing units. iv. The number of residents who have exited the system and are no longer in need of a homeless shelter or permanent supportive housing within the city, county, or city and county.
v. The number and bed capacity of new homeless shelters built pursuant to this section within the city, county, or city and county. The information regarding the bed capacity shall be included in reports due by January 1, 2022, and by January 1 of each year thereafter. Bed capacity shall not include the parking vehicle capacity of a homeless shelter on a parking lot  owned  or  leased  by  a  city,  county,  or  city  and  county  specifically identified  as  one  allowed  for  safe  parking  by  homeless  and  unstably housed individuals.
vi. New  actions  the  city,  county,  or  city  and  county  is  taking  under  the declared  shelter  crisis  to  better  serve  the  homeless  population  and  to reduce the number of people experiencing homelessness.
vii. The ordinance and any associated findings adopted by the city, county, or city and county pursuant to paragraph (2).
b. Monitor federal and state legislative actions, laws and resources.

Packet Pg. 407
Attachment: Shelter Crisis Action Plan (9.2(c)-- Consider Emergency Shelter Request for Proposals)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Accept oral report providing an update regarding the status of the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan.

Background/Analysis

In 2021, the City of Redding (City) received an unsolicited proposal by private parties to explore the design, feasibility, master planning, a nd eventual development of the approximate 45 -acre riverfront area consisting of the Civic Auditorium, Rodeo Grounds, and related facilities.

Eventual redevelopment of the Civic Auditorium and Redding Rodeo Grounds as well as planning for development/redevelopment of private property would have been addressed in that effort. However, after five public meetings, the City Council (Council) directed that the City- owned property not be declared surplus and that instead the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan (RRSP) be updated. Council decided to allocate $1,250,000 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds toward the RRSP update . I n early 2023, consulting firm MIG was awarded the contract and work began in earnest in late summer and fall of 2023.

A Community Open House was held in August of 2023 to introduce community members to the RRSP update project and hear their concerns and their vision for the future of the riverfront.

Also, in August 2023 the Council accepted a report regarding the community engagement strategy for the project and formed a Community Coalitio n Group to advance the effort of the RRSP update. The Community Coalition Group met four times throughout October and November 2023. U sing the input and resulting key themes from the Community Open Ho use discussions, staff develop the draft Vision and Guiding Principles Framework. This framework document was presented to and accepted by Council in January, 2024.

MEETING DATE: December 3, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.4(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.4(a)--Oral report - City of Redding Riverfront Specific Plan.

Jeremy Pagan, Development
Services Director/Bldg
Official
Packet Pg. 408
Report to Redding City Council November 26, 2024
Re: 9.4(a)--Oral report regarding Redding Riverfront Specific Plan update Page 2

Throughout early 2024, the project team completed an analysis of the existing condition s of the specific plan area, and began developing concepts and alternatives in alignment with the Vision and Guiding Principles Framework. By mid -May 2024, these preliminary concepts and alternatives were presented to the community in the form of two in -person workshops held at the Civic Auditorium. For those community members unable to attend these in -person workshops, in August 2024, an online survey was published presenting the same material. Participation for the in -person workshops and online survey was strong, with over one thousand community members providing responses.

The survey data has been compiled and will be presented to Council as part of this oral report.

The purpose of this oral report is to provide a brief background and overview of t he project , provide the Council with a status update regarding community feedback received to -date, and to discuss next steps in the process.

Environmental Review

This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no fur ther action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 409

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve and authorize the following:
(1) Offer Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code Title 11 (Vehicles and Traffic), Chapter 11. 12 (Speed Limits) by amending Section 11.12.010 (Established on Certain Streets) for first reading by title only and waive the full reading; (2) Direct the City Attorney to prepare a summary ordinance , if needed, and authorize the City Clerk to publish the summary ordinance according to law; and (3) Find that the action is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption.

Fiscal Impact

There is no direct fiscal impact with amending the Speed Limits Ordinance. Sufficient funds for the staff time to implement the requisite Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) changes are included in the adopted Public Works’ Streets Division’s Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the attached ordinance an d retain the zones as they were last adopted. The City of Redding Police Department (RPD) would be restricted on where it could use radar or other electronic devices, and citations would be vulnerable to overturning by the courts based on speed trap laws in accordance with Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

MEETING DATE: December 3, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.11(f)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(f)--Consider Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits, in the City of Redding
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 410
Report to Redding City Council November 26, 2024
Re: 9.11(f)--Ordinance amending RMC Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits Vol. 1 Page 2

Background/Analysis

In November 2024, Council reviewed and approved an amendment to Volume 3 of the City of Redding’s (City) E&TS. Staff has currently prepared an updated E&TS Volume 1 for review.

Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Section 11.12.010 sets forth the various streets, broken into four volumes, where speed limits other than prima facie apply within the City. The Council may amend this chapter to establish reasonable and prudent speed limits.

The process for preparing an E&TS , and the constraints on setting speed limits , is specified in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CaMUTCD). This process has resulted in staff's recommendation to revise Volume 1 of Chapter 11.12 of the RMC to set intermediate speed limits that reflect the results of the recently prepared E&TS.

Section 22349 of t he CVC establishes maximum speed limits of 65 mph on highways and 55 mph on two -lane undivided highways. CVC Sectio n 22352 establishes prima facie speed limits of 15 mph for rail crossings, sight -obstructed intersections, and alleys, and 25 mph for business and residential districts and school zones. Additionally, CVC Section 22358.8 enables the retaining of a current speed limit, if after completing an E&TS , the local authority finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe.

CVC Sections 22357 and 22358 also allow local authorities to declare intermediate speed limits between 55 mph and 25 mph on the basis of an E&TS. Speed zones that are justified by an E&TS allow RPD to enforce the limits using radar or laser technology in accordance with CVC Section 40802. This section also requires that the E&TS be reevaluated every seven years if local law enforcement officers are trained in the use of radar or laser equipment. This may be extended to every 1 4 years if, in addition to the radar training requirements, there are no significant changes in the roadway or traffic conditions.

The methodology for an E&TS is provided in CVC Section 627 and CaMUTCD Section 2B.13.

These sections require local authorities to consider the following when setting speed limits:

• Prevailing speeds;
• Accident records;
• Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to a driver; • Residential density; and
• Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

The CaMUTCD and CVC Section 21400(b) require that speed limits n ormally be set at the nearest five mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as the speed at which 85 percent of the traffic travels, or slower. This is the speed traveled by a majority of drivers and it is considered to be reasonable and prudent. The posted speed limit may be reduced by five miles per hour with justification based on a limited set of c onditions by a registered professional traffic or civil engineer. A larger reduction would constitute a speed trap. Consequently, some increases in speed limits are being recommended with this update. The CaMUTCD goes on to state that speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low because they:

• Create violators of the majority of drivers;
• Require constant enforcement;
• Would not command the respect of the public; and
Packet Pg. 411
Report to Redding City Council November 26, 2024
Re: 9.11(f)--Ordinance amending RMC Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits Vol. 1 Page 3

• Generally, result in an increase in collision rates.

The attached E&TS provides a list of the current and proposed speed limits for each of the street segments included in Volume 1 to be updated with this recommended action. In summary, staff is recommending decreasing the speed limit of fourteen street segments and adjusting the boundaries of seven street segments . The remaining street segments , including posted speed limits and boundaries, will remain unchanged. The attached draft ordinance for the Council’s consideration incorporates the recommendations as described above.

Environmental Review

Staff has determined that the action is Categorically Exempt from review un der the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Section 15061(b)(3). CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on t he environment. The action has been reviewed and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the action will have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Engineering & Traffic Surveys 2024 Update Summary - Volume 1 ^Clean Ordinance 2024
^Strikeout Ordinance 2024
^NOE Amending RMC Title 11
Packet Pg. 412
Street Existing
Speed Limit
Critical
Speed
(85th%)
Nearest
5 mph
Increment
Proposed
Speed Limit
Conditions justifying additional 5 mph
reduction

1.Airport Road
City Limits to Fig Tree Lane 50 49 50 45 -5 Rounded down per CVC 22358.6(c)

2.Bechelli Lane
S. Bonnyview Rd. to Cheryl Dr. (south) 45 48 50 45
Cheryl Dr. (south) to Third St. 40 45 45 40
Third St. to E. Cypress Ave. 35 43 40 35

3.Browning Street
Hilltop Dr. to Churn Creek Rd. 35 37 35 30 -5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Churn Creek Rd. to Old Alturas Rd. 40 42 40 35 -5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety

4.Canby Road
Dana Dr. to 170 ft. south of Jamieson Ct. 25 34 35 25 Remains same per CVC 22358.8 170 ft. south of Jamieson Ct. to 1,000 ft. 35 41 40 35
south of Tanglewood Dr.
1,000 ft. south of Tanglewood Dr. to Churn 30 33 35 30
Creek Rd.

5.Churn Creek Road
S. Bonnyview Rd. to Denton Wy. 45 49 50 45
Denton Wy. to Hartnell Ave. 40 43 45 40
Hartnell Ave. to E. Cypress Ave. 40 42 40 35 -5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety E. Cypress Ave. to Old Alturas Rd. 35 37 35 35
Old Alturas Rd. to Bodenhamer Blvd. 40 45 45 40
Bodenhamer Blvd. to SR 299 EB Ramps 45 49 50 45

6.Cypress Avenue
Pine St. to Hartnell Ave. 40 43 45 40
Hartnell Ave. to Bechelli Ln. 35 40 40 35
Bechelli Ln. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 35 35 30
Churn Creek Rd. to Victor Ave. 35 41 40 35

7.Hilltop Drive
E. Cypress Ave. to Dana Dr. 35 39 40 35
Dana Dr. to Palisades Ave. 35 39 40 35
Palisades Ave. to Peppertree Ln. 45 47 45 40 -5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Peppertree Ln. to Lake Blvd. 45 42 40 35 -10 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety

8.Keswick Dam Road
City Limits to Nash Rd. 40 43 45 40
100 ft. west of Lyons Rd. to Lake Blvd. 40 43 45 40

9.Knighton Road
City Limits to Lockheed Dr. 50 52 50 45 -5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Lockheed Dr. to Airport Rd. 40 42 40 35 -5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety

10.Mountain Lakes Boulevard
Beltline Rd. to George Dr. 45 42 40 40 -5

11.Oasis Road
Lake Blvd. to City Limits 45 44 45 40 -5 Bicycle Safety Woggon Ln. to Oak Leaf Ln. 50 56 55 50
Baier Rd. to Gold Hills Dr. 45 47 45 40 -5 Bicycle Safety Gold Hills Dr. to Old Oregon Trl. 55 56 55 50 -5 Bicycle Safety

12.Old Oregon Trail
Airport Rd. to Harley Leighton Rd. 40 46 45 40
Oasis Rd. to Midland Dr. 50 55 55 50
Midland Dr. to City Limits 45 46 45 40 -5 Bicycle Safety

13.South Bonnyview Road
SR 273 to E. Bonnyview Rd. 40 45 45 40
E. Bonnyview Rd. to Bechelli Ln. 50 54 55 50
Bechelli Ln. to Churn Creek Rd. 35 37 35 30 -5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety

14.Tarmac Road
Shasta View Dr. to Abernathy Ln. 35 42 40 35
Underscore - Denotes change from existing speed limit.

Engineering & Traffic Surveys
2024 Update Summary - Volume 1
11/19/2024Packet Pg. 413
Attachment: ^Engineering & Traffic Surveys 2024 Update Summary - Volume 1 (9.11(f)--Ordinance amending RMC Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits

NEW CLEAN ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO. _____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 11
(VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) CHAPTER 11.12 (SPEED LIMITS) BY
AMENDING SECTION 11.12.010 TO UPDATE VOLUME I, RELATIVE

TO SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Title 11 (Vehicles and Traffic), Chapter 11.12 (Speed Limits), Volume I of Section 11.12.010 is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.12.010 - Established on certain streets.

SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS STREETS

VOLUME I

1 Airport Road
City Limits to Fig Tree Ln. 45 MPH
2 Bechelli Lane
S. Bonnyview Rd. to Cheryl Dr. (south) 45 MPH
Cheryl Dr. (south) to Third St. 40 MPH
Third St. to E. Cypress Ave. 35 MPH
3 Browning Street
Hilltop Dr. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 MPH
Churn Creek Rd. to Old Alturas Rd. 35 MPH
4 Canby Road
Dana Dr. to 170 ft. south of Jamieson Ct. 25 MPH
170 ft. south of Jamieson Ct. to 1,000 ft. south of Tanglewood Dr.
35 MPH
1,000 ft. south of Tanglewood Dr. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 MPH 5 Churn Creek Road
S. Bonnyview Rd. to Denton Wy. 45 MPH
Denton Wy. to Hartnell Ave. 40 MPH
Hartnell Ave. to E. Cypress Ave. 35 MPH
E. Cypress Ave. to Old Alturas Rd. 35 MPH
Old Alturas Rd. to Bodenhamer Blvd. 40 MPH
Bodenhamer Blvd. to SR 299 eastbound ramps 45 MPH
6 Cypress Avenue
Pine St. to Hartnell Ave. 40 MPH
Packet Pg. 414
Attachment: ^Clean Ordinance 2024 (9.11(f)--Ordinance amending RMC Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits Vol. 1)

Hartnell Ave. to Bechelli Ln. 35 MPH
Bechelli Ln. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 MPH
Churn Creek Rd. to Victor Ave. 35 MPH
7 Hilltop Drive
E. Cypress Ave. to Dana Dr. 35 MPH
Dana Dr. to Palisades Ave. 35 MPH
Palisades Ave. to Peppertree Ln. 40 MPH
Peppertree Ln. to Lake Blvd. 35 MPH
8 Keswick Dam Road
City Limits to Nash Rd. 40 MPH
100 ft. west of Lyons Rd. to Lake Blvd. 40 MPH
9 Knighton Road
City Limits to Lockheed Dr. 45 MPH
Lockheed Dr. to Airport Rd. 35 MPH
10 Mountain Lakes Boulevard
Beltline Rd. to George Dr. 40 MPH
11 Oasis Road
Lake Blvd. to City Limits 40 MPH
Woggon Ln. to Oak Leaf Ln. 50 MPH
Baier Rd. to Gold Hills Dr. 40 MPH
Gold Hills Dr. to Old Oregon Tr. 50 MPH
12 Old Oregon Trail
Airport Rd. to Harley Leighton Dr. 40 MPH
Oasis Rd. to Midland Dr. 50 MPH
Midland Dr. to City Limits 40 MPH
13 South Bonnyview Road
SR 273 to E. Bonnyview Rd. 40 MPH
E. Bonnyview Rd. to Bechelli Ln. 50 MPH
Bechelli Ln. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 MPH
14 Tarmac Road
Shasta View Dr. to Abernathy Ln. 35 MPH

Section 2. The passage of this ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provision will remain in effect to the extent permitted by law.

Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption thereof and cause its publication according to law.

Packet Pg. 415
Attachment: ^Clean Ordinance 2024 (9.11(f)--Ordinance amending RMC Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits Vol. 1)

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 3rd day of December, 2024; and was duly read and adopt ed at a regular meeting on the _____ day of __________, 20 24, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

____________________________________
, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

DATE ATTESTED: _______________, 2024

Packet Pg. 416
Attachment: ^Clean Ordinance 2024 (9.11(f)--Ordinance amending RMC Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits Vol. 1)

STRIKEOUT ORDINANCE

OLD LANGUAGE: STRIKEOUT
NEW LANGUAGE: UNDERLINE

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 11
(VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) CHAPTER 11.12 (SPEED LIMITS) BY
AMENDING SECTION 11.12.010 TO UPDATE VOLUME I, RELATIVE

TO SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS

11.12.010 - Established on certain streets.

SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS STREETS

VOLUME I

1 Airport Road
City Limits to Fig Tree Ln. 50 45 MPH
2 Bechelli Lane
S. Bonnyview Rd. to 550 ft. south of Cheryl Dr. (south) 45 MPH 550 ft. south of Cheryl Dr. (south) to Third St. 40 MPH Third St. to E. Cypress Ave. 35 MPH
3 Browning Street
Hilltop Dr. to Churn Creek Rd. 35 30 MPH
Churn Creek Rd. to Old Alturas Rd. 40 35 MPH
4 Canby Road
Browning St. Dana Dr. to 170 ft. south of Jamieson Ct. 25 MPH 170 ft. south of Jamieson Ct. to 1,000 ft. south of Tanglewood Dr.
35 MPH
1,000 ft. south of Tanglewood Dr. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 MPH 5 Churn Creek Road
S. Bonnyview Rd. to Denton Wy. 45 MPH
Denton Wy. to E. Cypress Ave. Hartnell Ave. 40 MPH
E. Cypress Ave. Hartnell Ave. to Old Alturas Rd. E. Cypress Ave.
40 35 MPH
E. Cypress Ave. to Old Alturas Rd. 35 MPH
Old Alturas Rd. to Bodenhamer Blvd. 40 MPH
Bodenhamer Blvd. to 450 ft. south of College View Dr. SR 299 eastbound ramps
45 MPH
450 ft. south of College View Dr. to SR 299 eastbound ramps 40 MPH 6 Cypress Avenue
Pine St. to Hartnell Ave. 40 MPH
Hartnell Ave. to Bechelli Ln. 35 MPH
Packet Pg. 417
Attachment: ^Strikeout Ordinance 2024 (9.11(f)--Ordinance amending RMC Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits Vol. 1)

Bechelli Ln. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 MPH
Churn Creek Rd. to Victor Ave. 35 MPH
7 Hilltop Drive
E. Cypress Ave. to Palisades Ave. Dana Dr. 35 MPH
Palisades Ave. Dana Dr. to Palisades Ave. 35 MPH
Palisades Ave. to Lake Blvd. Peppertree Ln. 45 40 MPH
Peppertree Ln. to Lake Blvd. 45 35 MPH
8 Keswick Dam Road
City Limits to Nash Rd. 40 MPH
100 ft. west of Lyons Rd. to Lake Blvd. 40 MPH
9 Knighton Road
City Limits to Lockheed Dr. 50 45 MPH
Lockheed Dr. to Airport Rd. 40 35 MPH
10 Mountain Lakes Boulevard
Beltline Rd. to George Dr. 45 40 MPH
11 Oasis Road
Lake Blvd. to City Limits 45 40 MPH
Woggon Ln. to Oak Leaf Ln. 50 MPH
Baier Rd. to 250 ft. east of Gold Hills Dr. 45 40 MPH
250 ft. east of Gold Hills Dr. to Old Oregon Tr. 55 50 MPH 12 Old Oregon Trail
Airport Rd. to Harley Leighton Dr. 40 MPH
Oasis Rd. to Midland Dr. 50 MPH
Midland Dr. to City Limits 45 40 MPH
13 South Bonnyview Road
SR 273 to E. Bonnyview Rd. 40 MPH
E. Bonnyview Rd. to Bechelli Ln. 50 MPH
Bechelli Ln. to Churn Creek Rd. 35 30 MPH
14 Tarmac Road
Shasta View Dr. to Abernathy Ln. 35 MPH

Packet Pg. 418
Attachment: ^Strikeout Ordinance 2024 (9.11(f)--Ordinance amending RMC Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits Vol. 1) Packet Pg. 419
Attachment: ^NOE Amending RMC Title 11 (9.11(f)--Ordinance amending RMC Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits Vol. 1)