Redlands City Council
January 18, 2022

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 743 of 1274 DRAFT Appendix 2-A. Annual Precipitation and Water Year-Type at San Bernardino County Flood Control District Climate Stations in the Yucaipa Subbasin 2915
(2235')
3099
(2140')
3356
(2125')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
3126A
(2813')
3132
(2710')
3386
(2620')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
2890
(2606')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
3126
(2815')
3128B
(2860')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
Water Year
Ending
Western Heights Calimesa Crafton Wilson Creek
1994 11.26 82% Below Normal 12.95 11.35 15.80 80% Below Normal 1995 27.22 199% Wet 31.84 28.54 38.36 197% Wet
1996 9.13 67% Dry 12.12 10.19 14.06 73% Dry 6.12 55% Dry 1997 16.67 122% Above Normal 20.13 16.93 19.81 114% Above Normal 13.12 118% Above Normal 1998 25.55 187% Wet 32.10 28.60 33.27 188% Wet 21.04 189% Wet 1999 7.29 53% Dry 11.02 9.87 8.66 59% Dry 9.20 83% Below Normal 2000 6.40 47% Critically Dry 12.42 9.63 2.45 49% Critically Dry 7.12 64% Dry 2001 10.49 77% Below Normal 5.11 9.65 1.61 33% Critically Dry 4.56 41% Critically Dry 2002 2.46 18% Critically Dry 5.26 5.27 5.18 31% Critically Dry 3.32 30% Critically Dry 2003 17.57 129% Above Normal 21.32 19.50 16.92 115% Above Normal 13.76 123% Above Normal 2004 9.47 69% Dry 9.50 11.10 6.61 54% Dry 9.16 82% Below Normal 2005 29.04 31.39 221% Wet 41.67 32.73 31.70 212% Wet 17.80 160% Wet 2006 9.08 11.45 75% Below Normal 12.52 12.89 76% Below Normal 10.92 98% Normal 2007 4.48 3.34 29% Critically Dry 6.42 5.53 36% Critically Dry 5.53 50% Critically Dry 2008 11.64 13.34 91% Normal 17.94 14.79 98% Normal 12.20 109% Normal 2009 8.80 9.90 68% Dry 14.08 10.47 74% Dry 13.04 117% Above Normal 2010 15.45 17.80 122% Above Normal 16.40 17.68 102% Normal 15.49 139% Above Normal 2011 14.35 24.52 142% Above Normal 27.90 22.74 152% Wet 20.91 188% Wet 2012 8.73 9.57 67% Dry 10.85 10.80 65% Dry 9.37 84% Below Normal 2013 9.96 9.69 72% Dry 10.06 9.60 59% Dry 10.36 93% Normal 2014 15.00 6.55 79% Below Normal 7.55 7.58 45% Critically Dry 6.92 62% Dry 2015 10.88 13.06 88% Below Normal 14.78 12.39 81% Below Normal 12.72 114% Above Normal 2016 9.64 10.56 74% Dry 12.71 10.31 69% Dry 10.42 93% Normal 2017 17.76 19.12 135% Above Normal 21.49 18.38 120% Above Normal 16.94 152% Wet 2018 6.08 6.27 45% Critically Dry 7.52 6.48 42% Critically Dry 6.44 58% Dry AVERAGE 13.65 16.68 11.15 15.31

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 744 of 1274 DRAFT Appendix 2-A. Annual Precipitation and Water Year-Type at San Bernardino County Flood Control District Climate Stations in the Yucaipa Subbasin 1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
Water Year
Ending 3129
(2660')
3129A
(2660')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
3239
(2080')
3239A
(2281')
3023
(1285')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
3015
(4680')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
3121
(3695')
2800
(2946')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type

12.71 84% Below Normal 10.52 43% Critically Dry

16.54 110% Normal 20.04 82% Below Normal

12.74 84% Below Normal 21.89 89% Below Normal

10.82 72% Dry 18.60 76% Below Normal

14.34 95% Normal 19.04 78% Below Normal

28.13 186% Wet 43.92 179% Wet

7.57 50% Dry 13.85 57% Dry

13.17 87% Below Normal 20.88 85% Below Normal

5.48 36% Critically Dry 11.33 46% Critically Dry

20.06 133% Above Normal 27.10 111% Above Normal

10.31 68% Dry 17.48 71% Dry

11.41 76% Below Normal 7.66 66% Dry 21.71 89% Below Normal

14.92 99% Normal 10.60 9.59 86% Below Normal 22.47 92% Normal

19.14 127% Above Normal 13.34 13.47 115% Above Normal 31.05 127% Above Normal

23.80 158% Wet 17.11 17.52 148% Above Normal 40.75 166% Wet

15.77 105% Normal 9.72 9.71 83% Below Normal 20.20 82% Below Normal

28.50 189% Wet 24.72 24.30 210% Wet 49.90 204% Wet

9.51 63% Dry 7.59 7.42 64% Dry 17.15 70% Dry

12.19 81% Below Normal 8.99 9.05 77% Below Normal 19.16 78% Below Normal

8.04 53% Dry 5.98 5.67 50% Critically Dry 14.33 58% Dry

18.16 120% Above Normal 14.96 14.76 127% Above Normal 33.31 136% Above Normal

11.41 76% Below Normal 11.27 10.28 92% Normal 20.54 84% Below Normal

16.84 112% Above Normal 10.36 9.29 84% Below Normal 22.73 93% Normal

17.44 116% Above Normal 13.17 12.15 108% Normal 26.73 109% Normal

13.31 88% Below Normal 11.73 9.74 92% Normal 20.81 85% Below Normal

32.91 218% Wet 24.46 21.67 197% Wet 52.09 213% Wet

20.40 135% Above Normal 18.67 16.77 152% Wet 33.77 138% Above Normal

19.28 128% Above Normal 22.14 22.90 193% Wet 46.38 189% Wet

9.43 62% Dry 7.41 6.89 61% Dry 14.90 61% Dry 14.68 81% Below Normal

19.21 127% Above Normal 14.90 14.46 126% Above Normal 33.37 136% Above Normal 28.00 154% Wet

31.48 209% Wet 25.39 24.16 212% Wet 50.38 206% Wet 42.51 234% Wet

9.56 63% Dry 5.97 4.99 47% Critically Dry 18.80 77% Below Normal 15.90 88% Below Normal

13.70 91% Normal 9.02 8.72 76% Below Normal 22.02 90% Below Normal 20.70 114% Above Normal

15.33 102% Normal 11.24 9.25 88% Below Normal 26.00 106% Normal 19.00 105% Normal

12.52 83% Below Normal 7.90 7.79 67% Dry 19.29 79% Below Normal 5.75 32% Critically Dry

14.04 93% Normal 12.49 11.18 101% Normal 21.46 88% Below Normal 10.07 55% Dry

10.76 71% Dry 9.38 8.08 75% Dry 17.82 73% Dry 16.40 90% Normal

9.71 64% Dry 7.19 7.21 62% Dry 17.71 72% Dry 15.80 87% Below Normal

17.52 116% Above Normal 13.95 13.34 117% Above Normal 26.92 110% Normal 26.55 146% Above Normal

19.37 128% Above Normal 14.58 14.96 126% Above Normal 30.78 126% Above Normal 27.72 153% Wet

34.60 229% Wet 26.96 25.57 225% Wet 57.96 237% Wet 47.23 260% Wet Gateway Live Oak Triple Falls Creek Oak Glen

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 745 of 1274 DRAFT Appendix 2-A. Annual Precipitation and Water Year-Type at San Bernardino County Flood Control District Climate Stations in the Yucaipa Subbasin Water Year
Ending
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018

AVERAGE
3129
(2660')
3129A
(2660')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
3239
(2080')
3239A
(2281')
3023
(1285')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
3015
(4680')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
3121
(3695')
2800
(2946')
% of
Mean
Water Year
Type
Gateway Live Oak Triple Falls Creek Oak Glen

10.00 66% Dry 11.90 10.06 94% Normal 18.76 77% Below Normal 18.19 100% Normal

14.70 97% Normal 15.76 20.49 155% Wet 57.92 236% Wet 46.83 258% Wet

10.89 72% Dry 0.65 8.08 37% Critically Dry 20.04 82% Below Normal 16.40 90% Normal

16.06 106% Normal 9.03 10.77 85% Below Normal 30.39 124% Above Normal 22.92 126% Above Normal

24.70 164% Wet 17.22 22.29 169% Wet 49.46 202% Wet 44.58 246% Wet

7.63 51% Dry 6.30 6.46 55% Dry 11.32 46% Critically Dry 14.61 6.76 59% Dry

11.10 74% Dry 5.68 7.41 56% Dry 17.12 70% Dry 14.64 12.20 74% Dry

9.92 66% Dry 9.96 10.38 87% Below Normal 11.24 46% Critically Dry 17.23 12.12 81% Below Normal

5.66 38% Critically Dry 3.97 3.35 31% Critically Dry 6.72 27% Critically Dry 8.60 4.52 36% Critically Dry

19.47 129% Above Normal 16.45 12.18 122% Above Normal 14.28 58% Dry 29.20 14.36 120% Above Normal

11.84 78% Below Normal 11.58 9.16 89% Below Normal 18.39 75% Below Normal 9.57 10.08 54% Dry

32.70 217% Wet 24.43 209% Wet 34.14 139% Above Normal 38.28 211% Wet

13.14 87% Below Normal 10.30 9.52 85% Below Normal 22.58 92% Normal 13.72 76% Below Normal

6.56 43% Critically Dry 4.13 3.31 32% Critically Dry 9.71 40% Critically Dry 5.48 30% Critically Dry

14.67 97% Normal 11.93 9.46 91% Normal 27.54 112% Above Normal 16.20 89% Below Normal

12.11 80% Below Normal 11.35 8.91 87% Below Normal 18.11 74% Dry 11.52 63% Dry

18.79 125% Above Normal 17.25 15.12 138% Above Normal 29.72 121% Above Normal 18.15 100% Normal

25.09 166% Wet 22.33 17.38 170% Wet 36.82 150% Wet 24.96 138% Above Normal

11.80 78% Below Normal 8.84 4.34 56% Dry 15.13 62% Dry 11.68 64% Dry

5.25 35% Critically Dry 8.82 1.54 44% Critically Dry 15.69 64% Dry 9.56 53% Dry

4.45 29% Critically Dry 6.92 2.08 38% Critically Dry 14.07 57% Dry 7.80 43% Critically Dry

12.49 83% Below Normal 10.37 2.72 56% Dry 20.54 84% Below Normal 11.56 64% Dry

11.11 74% Dry 8.61 1.70 44% Critically Dry 18.80 77% Below Normal 11.51 63% Dry

17.18 114% Above Normal 16.90 14.42 134% Above Normal 16.04 65% Dry 17.56 97% Normal

6.47 43% Critically Dry 5.53 5.43 47% Critically Dry 7.44 30% Critically Dry 7.36 41% Critically Dry

15.09 11.69 24.50 18.15

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 746 of 1274 DRAFT Appendix 2-A. Annual Precipitation and Water Year-Type at San Bernardino County Flood Control District Climate Stations in the Yucaipa Subbasin 1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
Water Year
Ending % of
Mean
Avg.

Rainfall
(inches)
Water Year Type
62% 11.24 Dry
103% 17.36 Normal
88% 14.09 Below Normal
74% 11.51 Dry
87% 14.07 Below Normal
178% 26.82 Wet
56% 8.43 Dry
92% 14.11 Normal
41% 5.92 Critically Dry
121% 18.59 Above Normal
86% 13.51 Below Normal
78% 10.90 Below Normal
91% 12.39 Normal
122% 16.93 Above Normal
165% 22.94 Wet
96% 13.79 Normal
207% 30.04 Wet
64% 9.04 Dry
78% 11.29 Below Normal
52% 7.24 Dry
127% 18.16 Above Normal
81% 11.66 Below Normal
98% 14.06 Normal
105% 15.00 Normal
87% 12.47 Below Normal
206% 29.36 Wet
143% 21.15 Above Normal
167% 23.99 Wet
64% 9.70 Dry
130% 18.98 Above Normal
213% 31.75 Wet
64% 8.96 Dry
88% 12.76 Below Normal
98% 14.18 Normal
65% 9.26 Dry
86% 12.93 Below Normal
75% 11.36 Below Normal
66% 9.31 Dry
120% 18.32 Above Normal
127% 19.12 Above Normal
231% 34.51 Wet
Basin Wide

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 747 of 1274 DRAFT Appendix 2-A. Annual Precipitation and Water Year-Type at San Bernardino County Flood Control District Climate Stations in the Yucaipa Subbasin Water Year
Ending
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018

AVERAGE
% of
Mean
Avg.

Rainfall
(inches)
Water Year Type
Basin Wide
83% 12.69 Below Normal
191% 27.97 Wet
68% 9.74 Dry
114% 16.16 Above Normal
192% 27.71 Wet
58% 8.78 Dry
62% 8.91 Dry
61% 9.10 Dry
30% 4.76 Critically Dry
114% 18.07 Above Normal
72% 9.81 Dry
196% 31.08 Wet
84% 11.50 Below Normal
37% 4.98 Critically Dry
98% 13.57 Normal
80% 11.13 Below Normal
121% 16.90 Above Normal
158% 22.24 Wet
68% 9.55 Dry
60% 8.32 Dry
51% 7.21 Dry
81% 11.22 Below Normal
71% 9.62 Dry
117% 17.75 Above Normal
44% 6.40 Critically Dry

15.86 = weighted average

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 748 of 1274 Appendix 2-B
Information from CalGEM
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 749 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 750 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 751 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 752 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 753 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 754 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 755 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 756 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 757 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 758 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 759 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 760 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 761 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 762 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 763 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 764 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 765 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 766 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 767 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 768 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 769 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 770 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 771 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 772 of 1274 Appendix 2-C
Water Budget Analysis
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 773 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 774 of 1274 DRAFT
Low-elevation Mid-elevation High-elevaation Low-elevation Mid-elevation High-elevation January -0.000267 -0.009122 -0.001069 0.375161 0.949365 0.254554 -0.006274 0.986521 February -0.002090 -0.008838 -0.002369 0.410287 0.951706 0.254554 -0.006286 0.986626 March -0.002894 -0.008079 -0.002473 0.607330 0.944339 0.618303 -0.005846 0.981146 April -0.003499 -0.007159 -0.002392 0.728538 0.935666 0.555306 -0.005798 0.965877 May -0.004425 -0.006001 -0.001270 0.831409 0.937605 0.225797 -0.004960 0.906887 June -0.002725 -0.004569 -0.000979 0.636168 0.804955 0.104089 -0.004187 0.784555 July -0.000511 -0.004723 -0.000030 0.038804 0.789060 0.000088 -0.004783 0.795607 August -0.000715 -0.005240 -0.000809 0.079302 0.789060 0.071081 -0.005111 0.839502 September -0.000432 -0.007149 -0.001582 0.019373 0.890501 0.205146 -0.005646 0.904514 October -0.001161 -0.008536 -0.000633 0.134185 0.940326 0.049203 -0.005988 0.937825 November -0.000545 -0.008684 -0.001768 0.028359 0.942844 0.341591 -0.006120 0.978148 December 0.000048 -0.008963 -0.001861 0.000249 0.946138 0.375161 -0.005976 0.986968 Data provided by the USGS
Table 2C-1: Temperature Lapse Rates used in the YIHM
Month
Maximum temperature (Tmax)
Temperature
lapse rate
(degrees C/ft.)
Linear
regression
coefficient of
determination
Temperature lapse rate (degrees C/ft.) Linear regression coefficient of determination Minimum temperature (Tmin)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 775 of 1274 DRAFT
From
Beaumont
Basin
From San
Timoteo
Basin
From
SBBA
From
Crafton
Hills
From
Yucaipa Hills
From San
Bernardino
Mountains
Subtotal To Beaumont
Basin
To San
Timoteo
Basin
To SBBA To Crafton
Hills
To Yucaipa
Hills
To San
Bernardino
Mountains
Subtotal Annual Cumulative
1965 Normal 9,416 2,101 2,209 2,023 6,511 269 47 2,732 1,455 13,036 0 26,761 2,340 740 8,980 3,281 0 1,925 13 14,940 2,199 9,899 0 7 29,385 -2,624 -2,624 1966 Above Normal 10,441 2,101 5,153 2,115 6,449 248 46 2,791 1,596 13,243 0 30,938 2,697 741 8,954 3,464 0 1,958 14 15,132 2,629 11,609 31 9 32,108 -1,169 -3,794 1967 Wet 10,656 2,101 4,957 2,212 6,382 234 44 2,832 1,705 13,409 0 31,122 2,399 760 8,944 3,516 0 1,954 13 15,187 2,792 11,057 36 10 31,481 -359 -4,153 1968 Normal 9,688 2,107 3,166 2,232 6,379 229 43 2,861 1,837 13,581 0 28,541 2,611 774 8,974 3,356 0 1,945 13 15,063 2,422 11,106 16 8 31,225 -2,684 -6,837 1969 Wet 12,421 2,101 11,878 2,251 6,300 209 43 3,016 2,374 14,193 0 40,593 2,821 766 8,872 3,650 0 2,072 15 15,375 3,967 9,658 127 11 31,959 8,634 1,796 1970 Dry 10,341 2,515 4,557 2,148 6,313 185 41 3,187 2,298 14,172 0 31,585 2,925 737 8,958 3,490 0 2,072 17 15,275 3,018 9,861 111 11 31,200 385 2,181 1971 Below Normal 10,382 2,439 4,088 2,204 6,327 174 41 3,075 2,453 14,275 0 31,184 2,774 733 8,981 3,512 0 2,059 18 15,303 3,038 9,849 142 10 31,117 67 2,248 1972 Dry 10,002 2,446 3,302 2,223 6,356 169 41 3,016 2,295 14,100 0 29,850 3,004 747 9,018 3,494 0 2,019 21 15,299 2,783 10,818 156 8 32,068 -2,218 29 1973 Above Normal 10,912 2,439 5,141 2,197 6,286 165 41 2,951 2,241 13,881 0 32,373 2,478 746 9,003 3,665 0 2,019 20 15,452 3,391 10,411 217 10 31,960 413 442 1974 Below Normal 10,663 2,392 4,457 2,128 6,267 161 40 3,036 2,070 13,701 0 31,214 2,888 736 9,001 3,688 0 2,007 20 15,453 3,109 11,484 206 10 33,150 -1,936 -1,494 1975 Normal 10,059 2,571 3,316 1,975 6,263 157 39 3,005 2,021 13,459 0 29,405 2,546 718 9,009 3,640 0 1,977 19 15,362 2,748 10,501 133 9 31,299 -1,894 -3,388 1976 Normal 10,530 2,641 4,050 1,820 6,282 156 39 2,958 2,077 13,334 0 30,556 2,662 701 9,020 3,709 0 1,961 18 15,410 2,747 10,366 88 8 31,282 -726 -4,114 1977 Below Normal 10,098 2,634 4,238 1,720 6,246 160 39 2,929 2,093 13,187 0 30,158 2,753 687 9,020 3,632 0 1,956 19 15,313 2,716 9,906 100 9 30,798 -640 -4,754 1978 Wet 13,296 2,634 16,145 1,883 6,210 158 38 3,311 2,517 14,118 0 46,193 3,137 695 8,931 3,896 0 2,205 19 15,747 4,909 10,002 220 14 34,030 12,163 7,409 1979 Above Normal 12,654 2,634 9,423 1,845 6,251 139 35 3,642 2,618 14,530 0 39,242 3,072 698 9,016 3,967 0 2,296 23 16,001 4,675 9,764 267 18 33,797 5,445 12,854 1980 Wet 15,176 3,278 15,677 1,580 6,351 126 34 3,958 3,033 15,081 0 49,212 3,550 654 9,010 4,017 0 2,485 25 16,191 6,449 10,075 332 20 36,616 12,596 25,450 1981 Dry 12,933 3,483 6,838 1,187 6,413 119 32 4,029 2,842 14,623 0 37,877 3,860 612 9,083 3,853 0 2,419 27 15,993 4,774 10,198 286 17 35,129 2,748 28,198 1982 Above Normal 13,988 3,483 8,545 927 6,452 119 33 3,823 2,987 14,340 0 40,355 3,152 592 9,079 4,104 0 2,370 30 16,176 5,490 8,880 299 19 34,017 6,338 34,536 1983 Wet 14,684 3,483 11,157 788 6,457 116 31 3,857 2,913 14,163 0 43,486 3,110 598 9,100 4,248 0 2,427 29 16,402 6,184 8,353 332 22 34,405 9,081 43,617 1984 Dry 12,179 3,492 6,583 684 6,475 108 29 3,978 2,581 13,855 0 36,110 4,117 597 9,184 4,005 0 2,429 27 16,243 4,257 10,278 279 18 35,191 918 44,535 1985 Below Normal 12,335 5,337 6,275 652 6,467 102 29 3,861 2,555 13,668 0 37,615 3,874 601 9,162 4,081 0 2,402 27 16,274 4,297 10,533 268 18 35,264 2,351 46,886 1986 Normal 12,023 5,961 5,568 513 6,459 98 29 3,741 2,505 13,346 0 36,898 3,857 685 9,176 4,042 0 2,343 26 16,272 4,106 9,823 257 19 34,333 2,564 49,450 1987 Dry 11,289 5,961 4,170 438 6,430 96 30 3,640 2,385 13,020 0 34,439 3,878 698 9,179 4,037 0 2,299 24 16,237 3,593 9,987 230 19 33,945 494 49,944 1988 Below Normal 11,108 5,978 3,721 400 6,411 99 30 3,533 2,304 12,778 0 33,584 3,738 762 9,198 4,057 0 2,260 23 16,300 3,459 10,857 218 21 34,593 -1,008 48,936 1989 Below Normal 10,602 5,961 3,336 382 6,375 106 30 3,433 2,122 12,448 0 32,347 3,885 818 9,166 4,004 0 2,215 22 16,225 3,142 11,266 194 20 34,733 -2,385 46,551 1990 Dry 10,285 2,208 2,023 442 6,391 114 31 3,349 1,953 12,280 0 26,796 3,689 822 9,156 3,914 0 2,170 21 16,082 2,891 11,626 172 19 34,479 -7,683 38,868 1991 Above Normal 11,275 942 5,677 654 6,429 124 31 3,334 1,959 12,531 0 30,426 3,628 683 9,084 4,031 0 2,186 19 16,003 3,403 11,657 198 16 34,906 -4,480 34,387 1992 Above Normal 11,389 945 5,911 832 6,464 127 31 3,430 1,986 12,871 0 31,116 3,662 656 9,131 4,083 0 2,243 18 16,131 3,596 11,743 235 16 35,383 -4,267 30,120 1993 Wet 14,133 1,173 17,007 954 6,483 128 29 3,879 2,434 13,907 0 46,221 3,989 683 9,037 4,126 0 2,487 22 16,355 5,707 11,481 302 21 37,854 8,367 38,488 1994 Below Normal 12,201 1,195 5,643 964 6,561 109 28 4,023 2,454 14,139 0 33,177 3,815 697 9,147 4,145 0 2,490 19 16,499 4,233 11,947 279 20 36,794 -3,617 34,871 1995 Wet 15,315 1,489 12,358 936 6,618 111 27 4,046 2,873 14,612 0 43,774 3,876 724 9,088 4,227 0 2,566 22 16,627 6,814 11,870 354 22 39,562 4,212 39,083 1996 Dry 13,062 1,592 5,069 975 6,722 97 25 4,114 2,530 14,464 0 34,188 4,352 700 9,211 4,195 0 2,531 21 16,658 5,069 12,841 330 17 39,268 -5,080 34,002 1997 Above Normal 12,896 1,588 5,442 1,086 6,768 88 25 3,966 2,470 14,404 0 34,329 4,141 709 9,183 4,231 0 2,489 22 16,634 4,894 13,184 305 16 39,174 -4,845 29,157 1998 Wet 15,355 1,588 12,254 1,227 6,777 85 25 4,036 2,743 14,893 0 44,089 3,465 696 9,137 4,464 0 2,568 23 16,888 6,870 12,511 347 22 40,102 3,987 33,144 1999 Dry 12,540 1,588 4,722 1,275 6,784 79 24 4,131 2,404 14,696 0 33,546 3,976 699 9,227 4,338 0 2,537 21 16,823 4,719 14,065 315 18 39,917 -6,371 26,774 2000 Dry 12,304 1,868 4,044 1,409 6,867 79 26 4,011 2,425 14,817 0 33,032 4,176 727 9,260 4,276 0 2,505 21 16,790 4,279 14,988 299 15 40,546 -7,514 19,259 2001 Dry 12,246 1,955 3,666 1,241 6,840 84 27 3,836 2,417 14,445 0 32,312 3,699 800 9,221 4,358 0 2,437 20 16,838 4,338 14,330 297 15 39,516 -7,204 12,055 2002 Critically Dry 10,896 1,955 2,245 1,135 6,864 90 29 3,747 2,206 14,071 36 29,202 3,864 955 9,234 4,126 0 2,373 21 16,710 3,400 15,346 235 12 39,566 -10,364 1,691 2003 Above Normal 11,589 1,955 3,589 1,219 6,847 98 29 3,606 2,133 13,932 691 31,757 3,435 946 9,206 4,294 0 2,344 20 16,809 3,722 14,513 242 19 38,740 -6,983 -5,292 2004 Dry 10,939 1,961 2,926 1,212 6,849 106 30 3,581 1,988 13,767 624 30,216 3,649 1,224 9,233 4,155 0 2,323 17 16,952 3,316 14,215 215 19 38,367 -8,151 -13,443 2005 Wet 13,561 2,831 11,620 1,205 6,795 106 30 3,757 2,257 14,150 135 42,297 3,483 1,173 9,112 4,413 0 2,442 19 17,159 5,250 13,561 276 19 39,747 2,550 -10,894 2006 Below Normal 11,309 3,126 4,449 1,193 6,807 90 29 3,894 2,152 14,164 17 33,065 3,685 1,290 9,203 4,248 0 2,435 17 17,193 3,628 13,478 239 13 38,237 -5,172 -16,065 2007 Critically Dry 10,581 3,126 2,745 1,218 6,866 84 29 3,741 2,284 14,221 4 30,677 3,823 1,604 9,220 4,102 0 2,382 17 17,326 3,132 13,166 199 10 37,656 -6,979 -23,044 2008 Normal 11,284 3,135 4,099 1,234 6,877 85 29 3,580 2,292 14,098 551 33,166 3,664 1,148 9,226 4,276 0 2,343 17 17,010 3,554 11,395 218 17 35,858 -2,693 -25,737 2009 Below Normal 11,112 3,126 4,005 1,251 6,825 84 29 3,482 2,096 13,768 1,337 33,349 3,769 831 9,200 4,214 0 2,284 17 16,547 3,503 10,171 215 38 34,243 -895 -26,632 2010 Above Normal 12,416 3,787 6,687 1,222 6,752 79 28 3,465 1,985 13,532 3,549 39,971 3,635 810 9,165 4,322 0 2,274 18 16,591 4,528 10,400 236 112 35,502 4,470 -22,162 2011 Wet 12,924 4,009 8,383 1,161 6,708 66 27 3,523 2,000 13,487 3,071 41,875 3,740 791 9,145 4,482 0 2,304 17 16,738 4,892 9,839 254 128 35,591 6,283 -15,879 2012 Dry 11,403 4,020 4,835 1,101 6,720 52 26 3,584 1,886 13,369 2,936 36,564 4,066 812 9,227 4,356 1 2,301 16 16,712 3,864 10,174 209 98 35,123 1,441 -14,438 2013 Dry 11,089 4,009 4,164 1,051 6,724 44 25 3,491 2,030 13,366 2,170 34,799 3,806 900 9,190 4,441 1 2,263 16 16,810 3,562 10,341 182 79 34,781 18 -14,420 2014 Dry 10,633 4,009 3,544 1,013 6,731 41 25 3,398 2,005 13,212 521 31,920 3,767 1,068 9,199 4,340 1 2,222 16 16,846 3,127 11,897 176 29 35,840 -3,920 -18,340 11,812 2,829 6,101 1,315 6,544 123 32 3,524 2,277 13,815 313 34,870 3,460 795 9,109 4,011 0 2,272 20 16,207 3,984 11,346 217 23 35,237 -367 10,738 2,541 2,495 1,177 6,865 87 29 3,744 2,245 14,146 20 29,940 3,844 1,280 9,227 4,114 0 2,378 19 17,018 3,266 14,256 217 11 38,611 -8,671 11,518 2,936 4,317 1,171 6,615 98 29 3,668 2,289 13,870 447 33,088 3,783 796 9,168 4,089 0 2,323 20 16,397 3,828 11,830 233 27 36,098 -3,010 11,090 3,576 4,468 1,211 6,476 121 33 3,474 2,255 13,570 150 32,855 3,465 795 9,120 3,954 0 2,234 20 16,123 3,458 11,055 207 18 34,325 -1,471 10,500 3,086 3,734 1,633 6,462 165 38 3,146 2,031 13,475 92 30,888 2,947 794 9,064 3,717 0 2,083 18 15,676 2,963 10,515 119 11 32,230 -1,343 11,951 2,208 6,174 1,344 6,522 132 33 3,445 2,219 13,696 471 34,501 3,322 731 9,091 4,018 0 2,242 20 16,103 4,036 11,351 226 26 35,065 -564 13,752 2,469 12,144 1,420 6,508 134 33 3,622 2,485 14,201 321 42,886 3,357 754 9,037 4,104 0 2,351 20 16,267 5,383 10,841 258 29 36,135 6,751 A Water Year corresponds to October 1 of the previous year, through September 30th of the current year.

B
Return flows consist of water that recharges the Subbasin via municipal distribution network leaks, septic system discharges, and infiltration of irrigation water C
Groundwater Extractions are broken down by Usage Sector in Table 2C-7 D
Represents surface water diversions through the operation of YVWD-25 E
The YIHM calculates groundwater discharges to land surface when groundwater elevations in a given cell are higher than the top elevation of the cell Total Basin
Outflows ET GW Discharges to Streams GW ExtractionsC Groundwater Discharge to SurfaceE
Subsurface Outflows
Surface Water
DiversionsD
Return
FlowsB
Precipitation
Recharge
Surface Water
Spreading
Total Basin
Inflows
Subsurface Inflows Change in Storage
Wet Water Year Average
Table 2C-2: Historical Water Budget for the Yucaipa Subbasin Historical Average
Critically Dry Wate Year Average
Dry Water Year Average
Below Normal Water Year Average
Normal Water Year Average
Above Normal Water Year Average
Water
YearA Water Year Type
Individual Components of the Basin Water Budget Reported in Units of Acre-Feet (AF) Inflows to Groundwater System (AF) Outflows from Groundwater System Stream
Leakage
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 776 of 1274 DRAFT
South Mesa YVWD Total
1965 - - -
1966 - 0 -
1967 - 0 -
1968 - 0 -
1969 - 0 -
1970 - 0 -
1971 - 0 -
1972 - 0 -
1973 - 0 -
1974 - 0 -
1975 - 0 -
1976 - 0 -
1977 - 0 -
1978 - 0 -
1979 - 0 -
1980 - 0 -
1981 0 20 20
1982 0 104 104
1983 0 43 43
1984 0 18 18
1985 0 13 13
1986 0 6 6
1987 0 14 14
1988 263 19 282
1989 373 45 418
1990 469 41 509
1991 403 14 417
1992 353 2 355
1993 417 2 419
1994 488 14 502
1995 523 6 529
1996 582 7 589
1997 609 7 615
1998 504 3 507
1999 560 3 563
2000 577 25 602
2001 553 886 1,439
2002 537 1,518 2,055
2003 382 1,693 2,075
2004 474 1,657 2,131
2005 610 1,279 1,890
2006 643 1,709 2,352
2007 662 1,609 2,271
2008 509 777 1,286
2009 399 551 951
2010 422 665 1,087
2011 415 587 1,002
2012 441 694 1,135
2013 338 1,010 1,349
2014 417 1,198 1,615
Average 380 331 858
AF = acre-feet
Water Year Imported Groundwater (AF)
Ending
Table 2C-3: Imported Groundwater to the Yucaipa Subbasin Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 777 of 1274 DRAFT
Delivered to

YVWRFF (AF)
Delivered to Wilson
Creek spreading
Basins (AF)
Delivered to Oak
Glen Creek
spreading Basins
(AF)
Total SBVMWD
Imports (AF)
Delivered to

YVWRFF (AF)
Delivered to Wilson
Creek spreading
Basins (AF)
Delivered to Oak
Glen Creek
spreading Basins
(AF)
Total SGPWA
Imports (AF)
2003 855 0 0 855 855
2004 1,246 0 0 1,246 0 0 0 0 1,246
2005 1,357 0 0 1,357 0 0 0 0 1,357
2006 2,213 0 0 2,213 0 0 0 0 2,213
2007 3,539 0 0 3,539 0 0 0 0 3,539
2008 7,263 0 0 7,263 0 0 0 0 7,263
2009 7,428 0 48 7,476 0 0 0 0 7,476
2010 5,530 0 0 5,530 0 0 0 0 5,530
2011 5,581 1,542 141 7,264 0 0 0 0 7,264
2012 6,008 3,119 267 9,394 0 0 0 0 9,394
2013 5,846 2,824 220 8,890 0 0 0 0 8,890
2014 5,133 0 159 5,292 0 0 0 0 5,292
2015 3,845 0 0 3,845 0 0 0 0 3,845
2016 7,145 0 0 7,145 0 0 0 0 7,145
2017 8,764 6,579 0 15,343 0 0 0 0 15,343
2018 8,455 1,180 558 10,192 0 0 0 0 10,192
Total 80,210 15,244 1,393 96,846 0 0 0 0 96,846
AF = acre-feet
Table 2C-4: Imported Surface Water Supplies to the Subbasin From SBVMWD
Water Year
Ending
From SGWPA
Total SWP Water
Imported to the
Subbasin (AF)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 778 of 1274 DRAFT
to Wilson
Creek
Spreading
Basins
to Oak Glen
Creek
Spreading
Basins
Total SWP
Water Used
for Spreading
2001 0 0
2002 0 0 36
2003 0 0 0 0 0 691
2004 0 0 0 0 0 624
2005 0 0 0 0 0 135
2006 0 0 0 0 0 17
2007 0 0 0 0 0 4
2008 0 0 0 0 0 551
2009 0 48 48 0 48 1,337
2010 0 0 0 0 0 3,549
2011 1,542 141 1,683 0 1,683 3,071
2012 3,119 267 3,386 0 3,386 2,936
2013 2,824 220 3,044 0 3,044 2,170
2014 0 159 159 0 159 521
2015 0 0 0 133 133 313
2016 0 0 0 8 8 N/Aa
2017 6,579 0 6,579 3 6,582 N/Aa
2018 1,180 558 1,737 20 1,757 N/Aa
Total 15,244 1,393 16,637 164 16,801 15,955
AF = acre-feet
Table 2C-5: Spreading at the Oak Glen Creek and Wilson Creek Spreading Basins Water Year
Ending
a
The YIHM was designed to simulate groundwater conditions through water year 2014, and therefore does not contain estimates of recharge at the Spreading Basins between 2015 and 2019.

YVWRFF Water
Diverted to
Spreading Basins
(AF)
Total Water Delivered
for Spreading at the
Wilson Creek and Oak
Glen Creek Spreading
Basins (AF)
Simulated Spreading
at the Oak Glen Creek
and Wilson Creek
Spreading Basins (AF)
Imported Water Delivered (AF)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 779 of 1274 DRAFT
Water Year Ending Well 25 Production (AF)
Surface Water
Diversion from Oak
Glen Creek (AF)
Surface Water
Diversion from Birch
Creek (AF)
Total Surface Water
Diversions (AF)
2001 312 29 56 396
2002 303 65 81 449
2003 330 67 105 502
2004 288 24 48 360
2005 322 107 99 527
2006 327 46 148 520
2007 313 57 47 418
2008 278 95 9 382
2009 287 50 19 356
2010 302 61 0 363
2011 342 36 0 378
2012 267 8 0 275
2013 215 20 0 235
2014 230 13 0 243
2015 217 12 0 229
2016 210 13 0 223
2017 205 4 0 209
2018 192 0 0 192
Total 4,938 707 611 6,257
AF = acre-feet
Table 2C-6:

Historical and Current surface water diversion points and diversions in the Subbasin Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 780 of 1274 DRAFT
Irrigation (AF)
YVWD South Mesa WHWC South Mountain Subtotal
1965 Normal 2,996 1,602 1,499 115 6,211 3,688 9,899
1966 Above Normal 3,189 2,732 1,436 376 7,734 3,876 11,609 1967 Wet 3,296 3,035 1,266 337 7,933 3,124 11,057
1968 Normal 3,252 2,869 1,278 456 7,855 3,251 11,106
1969 Wet 3,362 2,174 936 226 6,698 2,959 9,658
1970 Dry 3,433 2,195 1,085 405 7,117 2,743 9,861
1971 Below Normal 3,341 2,088 1,187 506 7,122 2,728 9,849 1972 Dry 3,489 2,098 1,498 467 7,551 3,267 10,818
1973 Above Normal 3,280 2,289 1,334 780 7,683 2,728 10,411 1974 Below Normal 3,990 2,518 1,428 815 8,751 2,734 11,484 1975 Normal 3,347 2,346 1,430 812 7,936 2,565 10,501
1976 Normal 3,403 2,260 1,391 779 7,832 2,534 10,366
1977 Below Normal 3,527 2,277 1,327 474 7,605 2,301 9,906 1978 Wet 3,204 2,297 1,373 567 7,441 2,561 10,002
1979 Above Normal 2,908 2,394 1,510 514 7,325 2,439 9,764 1980 Wet 3,140 2,530 1,445 426 7,541 2,534 10,075
1981 Dry 3,375 2,660 1,556 80 7,672 2,526 10,198
1982 Above Normal 2,635 1,960 1,399 579 6,573 2,307 8,880 1983 Wet 2,359 1,731 1,384 795 6,269 2,084 8,353
1984 Dry 3,288 2,243 1,670 900 8,100 2,178 10,278
1985 Below Normal 3,602 2,261 1,771 956 8,590 1,943 10,533 1986 Normal 3,883 1,309 1,864 867 7,924 1,899 9,823
1987 Dry 3,945 1,650 1,625 935 8,155 1,833 9,987
1988 Below Normal 4,547 1,756 1,838 1,000 9,142 1,715 10,857 1989 Below Normal 5,131 1,716 2,042 825 9,713 1,553 11,266 1990 Dry 5,323 1,755 2,130 687 9,895 1,731 11,626
1991 Above Normal 5,569 1,607 2,052 899 10,127 1,530 11,657 1992 Above Normal 5,628 1,596 2,065 1,063 10,352 1,391 11,743 1993 Wet 5,261 1,712 2,113 791 9,877 1,604 11,481
1994 Below Normal 5,509 1,694 2,181 793 10,177 1,770 11,947 1995 Wet 5,567 1,637 2,139 888 10,230 1,640 11,870
1996 Dry 6,243 1,781 2,353 1,016 11,392 1,450 12,841
1997 Above Normal 6,512 1,799 2,331 1,091 11,733 1,451 13,184 1998 Wet 5,929 1,685 3,038 744 11,396 1,116 12,511
1999 Dry 7,438 1,904 2,450 1,144 12,936 1,129 14,065
2000 Dry 8,519 1,991 2,418 913 13,841 1,147 14,988
2001 Dry 8,382 2,029 2,365 832 13,607 723 14,330
2002 Critically Dry 9,121 2,176 2,473 946 14,716 629 15,346 2003 Above Normal 8,506 2,282 2,346 743 13,877 636 14,513 2004 Dry 8,841 2,196 2,392 208 13,637 578 14,215
2005 Wet 8,555 1,965 2,383 69 12,972 588 13,561
2006 Below Normal 8,362 2,037 2,542 12 12,953 525 13,478 2007 Critically Dry 7,821 2,151 2,765 - 12,738 428 13,166 2008 Normal 6,350 2,198 2,460 - 11,008 387 11,395
2009 Below Normal 5,692 2,148 1,964 - 9,805 366 10,171
2010 Above Normal 6,205 1,934 1,873 - 10,012 388 10,400 2011 Wet 5,685 1,826 1,946 - 9,458 381 9,839
2012 Dry 5,824 1,905 2,093 - 9,822 352 10,174
2013 Dry 5,837 2,086 2,081 - 10,004 338 10,341
2014 Dry 7,227 2,023 2,114 210 11,574 323 11,897
5,116 2,062 1,873 652 9,612 1,733 11,346
8,471 2,164 2,619 946 13,727 529 14,256
5,797 2,037 1,988 650 10,379 1,451 11,830
4,856 2,055 1,809 673 9,317 1,737 11,055
3,872 2,097 1,654 606 8,128 2,387 10,515
4,937 2,066 1,816 756 9,491 1,861 11,351
4,636 2,059 1,802 538 8,981 1,859 10,841
AF = acre-feet
Normal Water Year Average
Above Normal Water Year Average
Wet Water Year Average
Historical Average
Critically Dry Wate Year Average
Dry Water Year Average
Below Normal Water Year Average
Table 2C-7: Historical Groundwater Extractions by Usage Type in the Subbasin Water Year TypeB Water YearA
Municipal Groundwater Extractions (AF)
Private Well
Extractions (AF)
Total Groundwater
Extractions (AF)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 781 of 1274 DRAFT
Historical Sustainable Yield
Estimated from the YIHM
YIHM Water Budget Zero-Net Draft Hill Hydrologic Water Balance Triple Falls Creek 394 215 310 -
Oak Glen 473 415 600 -
Gateway 1,947 1,775 1,440 -
Crafton 427 200 370 -
Wilson Creek 696 1,520 1,245 -
Western Heights 1,764 2,270 2,100 -
Calimesa 4,354 3,195 3,580 -
Live Oak 962 - - -
Singletona 0 - - -
Yucaipa Subbasin 10,981 9,590 9,645 9,683
Estimates of safe yield have not previously been calculated for the Singleton and Live Oak Hydrogeologic Subareas Table 2C-8: Estimates of Safe Yield in the Yucaipa Subbasin and Subareas (AFY) Subarea
GSSI (2014) Estimates of Safe Yield
a
Results from the YIHM indicate that groundwater in storage declined by approximately 36 AFY; this was subtractred from the total Subbasin sustainable yield, and represented as a zero for the Singelton Subarea sustainable yield Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 782 of 1274 DRAFT
Water Year Type
Number of occurences
between 1965 and 2014 Water Years
Critically Dry 2 2002, 2007
Dry 14 1970, 1972, 1981, 1984, 1987, 1990,
1996, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2012, 2013, 2014
Below Normal 9 1971, 1974, 1977, 1985, 1988, 1994,
2006, 2009
Normal 6 1965, 1968, 1975, 1976, 1986, 2008
Above Normal 9 1966, 1973, 1979, 1982, 1991, 1992,
1997, 2003, 2010
Wet 10 1967, 1969, 1978, 1980, 1983, 1993,
1995, 1998, 2005, 2011
Table 2C-9:

Historical Water Year Type Distribution in the Subbasin Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 783 of 1274 DRAFT
Water Year Ending Water Year Type
SWP water
imported from
SBVMWD
SWP water
imported from
SGPWA
Surface water
diversions from
Oak Glen Creek,
Birch Creek, and
Well 25
Total Surface
Water
Availability
2001 Dry --- --- 396 396
2002 Critically Dry --- --- 449 449
2003 Above Normal 855 --- 502 1,357
2004 Dry 1,246 --- 360 1,606
2005 Wet 1,357 --- 527 1,885
2006 Below Normal 2,213 --- 520 2,734
2007 Critically Dry 3,539 --- 418 3,957
2008 Normal 7,263 --- 382 7,645
2009 Below Normal 7,476 --- 356 7,832
2010 Above Normal 5,530 --- 363 5,893
2011 Wet 7,264 --- 378 7,642
2012 Dry 9,394 --- 275 9,670
2013 Dry 8,890 --- 235 9,125
2014 Dry 5,292 --- 243 5,536
5,027 --- 380 4,695
3,539 --- 434 2,203
6,206 --- 302 5,267
4,844 --- 438 5,283
7,263 --- 382 7,645
3,193 --- 432 3,625
4,311 --- 452 4,763
--- = Blank cells indicate that YVWD had not contracted with SWP providers during this period Wet Water Year Average
Average
Table 2C-10: Historical Surface Water Availability in the Subbasin Critically Dry Wate Year Average
Dry Water Year Average
Below Normal Water Year Average
Normal Water Year Average
Above Normal Water Year Average
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 784 of 1274 DRAFT
From Beaumont
Basin
From San
Timoteo Basin From SBBA From Crafton
Hills
From Yucaipa
Hills
From San
Bernardino
Mountains
Subtotal To Beaumont
Basin
To San Timoteo
Basin To SBBA To Crafton Hills To Yucaipa Hills
To San
Bernardino
Mountains
Subtotal Annual Cumulative
2015 Below Normal 10,571 4,009 2,903 1,006 6,721 39 25 3,292 1,887 12,970 115 30,568 3,426 1,066 9,186 4,372 1 2,180 17 16,821 3,073 10,461 188 9 33,978 -3,410 -3,410 2016 Dry 10,576 4,020 3,647 996 6,700 39 26 3,223 1,751 12,735 6 30,985 3,443 916 9,199 4,437 1 2,138 17 16,708 3,026 7,915 189 10 31,292 -307 -3,717 2017 Above Normal 14,433 4,009 10,073 949 6,614 38 25 3,251 1,815 12,692 6,582 47,790 3,719 944 9,127 4,550 1 2,176 21 16,818 6,557 7,223 205 320 34,842 12,947 9,230 2018 Critically Dry 11,349 4,009 5,339 889 6,581 32 22 3,298 1,577 12,399 1,757 34,854 3,965 1,003 9,163 4,454 1 2,154 20 16,795 3,852 9,073 182 191 34,058 796 10,026 11,732 4,012 5,491 960 6,654 37 24 3,266 1,758 12,699 2,115 36,049 3,638 982 9,169 4,453 1 2,162 19 16,786 4,127 8,668 191 133 33,542 2,506 - A
Water Year corresponds to October 1 of the previous year, through September 30th of the current year.

B
Return flows consist of water that recharges the Subbasin via municipal distribution network leaks, septic system discharges, and infiltration of irrigation water C
Represents surface water diversions through the operation of YVWD-25 D
The YIHM calculates groundwater discharges to land surface when groundwater elevations in a given cell are higher than the top elevation of the cell Individual Components of the Basin Water Budget Reported in Units of Acre-Feet (AF) Individual Components of the Basin Water Budget Reported in Units of Acre-Feet (AF) Table 2C-11
Current Condition Water Budget for the Yucaipa Subbasin Water Year
Type
Table 2C11
ET
Change in Groundwater in Storage
GW Discharge to
SurfaceD
Total Basin
Outflows
Total
Basin
Inflows
Average
Inflows to Groundwater System Outflows from Groundwater System Stream
Leakage
Return
FlowsB
Precipitation
Recharge
Subsurface Inflows Subsurface Outflows
GW Discharges to
Streams GW Extractions
Surface Water
DiversionsC
Surface Water
Spreading
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 785 of 1274 DRAFT
Management Area
Sustainable Yield
(AFY)
Calimesa 4,955
North Bench 3,940
San Timoteo 325
Western Heights 1,760
Total 10,980
Table 2C-12: Sustainable Yield for each
Management Area in the Yucaipa Subbasin
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 786 of 1274 DRAFT
From
Beaumont
Basin
From San
Timoteo
Basin
From SBBA From
Crafton Hills
From
Yucaipa Hills
From San
Bernardino
Mtns
Subtotal To Beaumont
Basin
To San
Timoteo
Basin
To SBBA To Crafton
Hills
To Yucaipa
Hills
To San
Bernardino
Mtns
Subtotal
2019 11,119 4,009 3,705 891 6,574 27 21 3,200 1,574 12,287 2,139 33,260 3,429 1,068 9,160 4,488 1 2,114 16 16,846 3,534 10,563 139 106 34,617 -1,357 -1,357 2020 11,256 4,020 4,161 893 6,573 26 21 3,127 1,721 12,362 2,139 33,939 3,457 1,088 9,186 4,559 1 2,099 16 16,949 3,679 10,555 153 120 34,912 -973 -2,330 2021 11,381 4,009 4,687 889 6,540 24 22 3,069 1,682 12,226 2,139 34,443 3,337 1,102 9,154 4,576 1 2,080 17 16,929 3,760 10,557 150 118 34,852 -409 -2,739 2022 12,253 4,009 8,268 897 6,527 22 21 3,155 1,757 12,380 2,139 39,050 3,894 1,120 9,110 4,698 1 2,126 19 17,074 4,319 10,586 188 119 36,180 2,869 131 2023 12,601 4,009 8,223 877 6,500 18 20 3,233 1,797 12,446 2,139 39,418 3,532 1,142 9,110 4,798 1 2,154 19 17,224 4,602 10,600 192 123 36,273 3,145 3,276 2024 11,731 4,020 5,605 864 6,531 16 20 3,287 1,852 12,570 2,139 36,065 3,911 1,179 9,178 4,659 1 2,167 17 17,201 4,097 10,580 191 119 36,101 -36 3,240 2025 14,806 4,009 15,922 864 6,521 14 18 3,494 2,405 13,317 2,139 50,193 4,268 1,204 9,072 4,788 1 2,313 20 17,398 6,641 10,632 191 126 39,256 10,936 14,177 2026 12,928 4,009 6,836 818 6,502 10 17 3,691 2,308 13,346 2,139 39,258 4,552 1,212 9,165 4,835 2 2,332 20 17,565 5,294 10,619 192 123 38,345 913 15,090 2027 13,302 4,009 6,429 807 6,527 9 18 3,566 2,394 13,321 2,139 39,200 4,373 1,297 9,190 4,889 1 2,287 22 17,687 5,505 10,614 192 124 38,495 705 15,795 2028 12,384 4,020 4,901 800 6,575 10 19 3,498 2,267 13,169 2,139 36,614 4,589 1,368 9,227 4,809 1 2,255 22 17,682 4,762 10,603 192 118 37,946 -1,332 14,463 2029 13,775 4,009 7,923 796 6,526 11 20 3,440 2,337 13,129 2,139 40,975 3,888 1,427 9,181 5,024 1 2,262 23 17,918 5,942 10,630 192 126 38,696 2,279 16,742 2030 13,039 4,009 6,948 793 6,514 11 20 3,509 2,112 12,959 2,139 39,094 4,476 1,466 9,178 4,914 1 2,266 23 17,849 5,345 10,633 192 123 38,618 475 17,217 2031 12,531 4,009 5,242 782 6,488 10 21 3,480 2,058 12,839 2,139 36,760 3,932 1,515 9,201 4,976 1 2,253 21 17,968 4,863 10,617 192 124 37,695 -935 16,282 2032 12,807 4,020 5,934 777 6,532 11 22 3,426 2,087 12,854 2,139 37,755 4,044 1,539 9,213 4,922 1 2,236 21 17,933 4,857 10,612 192 122 37,760 -5 16,277 2033 12,687 4,009 6,488 780 6,497 11 22 3,399 2,146 12,855 2,139 38,178 4,390 1,558 9,198 4,935 1 2,233 22 17,947 4,934 10,616 192 125 38,204 -26 16,250 2034 16,306 4,009 20,771 793 6,500 10 19 3,829 2,645 13,796 2,139 57,022 4,944 1,562 9,109 4,944 2 2,478 24 18,120 8,567 10,656 192 133 42,612 14,410 30,661 2035 16,645 4,009 13,198 732 6,439 6 15 4,143 2,638 13,974 2,139 49,965 5,061 1,561 9,170 5,144 4 2,598 23 18,500 8,965 10,657 192 139 43,513 6,452 37,112 2036 18,647 4,020 18,833 733 6,530 6 15 4,425 3,042 14,750 2,139 58,389 5,916 1,668 9,184 5,217 5 2,749 23 18,845 11,184 10,659 192 143 46,939 11,450 48,562 2037 17,040 4,009 7,761 678 6,554 6 15 4,441 2,818 14,511 2,139 45,461 6,310 1,716 9,234 5,315 3 2,674 22 18,965 9,150 10,630 192 135 45,381 79 48,642 2038 17,748 4,009 9,711 668 6,583 6 18 4,221 3,000 14,496 2,139 48,104 5,089 1,839 9,227 5,290 2 2,598 24 18,980 10,011 10,647 192 141 45,059 3,044 51,686 2039 18,164 4,009 13,277 672 6,640 6 18 4,272 3,007 14,614 2,139 52,204 5,181 1,924 9,178 5,299 2 2,663 25 19,092 11,186 10,663 192 150 46,465 5,739 57,425 2040 15,910 4,020 7,992 649 6,640 6 17 4,341 2,619 14,272 2,139 44,333 6,392 1,990 9,275 5,307 2 2,657 22 19,254 8,643 10,644 192 137 45,262 -928 56,497 2041 15,544 4,009 6,661 640 6,628 7 20 4,193 2,581 14,069 2,139 42,423 5,568 2,048 9,310 5,248 2 2,583 24 19,214 7,880 10,636 192 131 43,621 -1,198 55,299 2042 15,227 4,009 5,659 645 6,635 6 23 4,063 2,563 13,936 2,139 40,970 5,383 2,065 9,355 5,346 2 2,522 23 19,313 7,276 10,624 192 127 42,916 -1,946 53,353 2043 14,169 4,009 4,511 647 6,623 6 24 3,925 2,435 13,661 2,139 38,489 5,130 2,079 9,371 5,291 2 2,461 24 19,227 6,320 10,612 192 125 41,607 -3,118 50,235 2044 13,612 4,020 4,634 657 6,630 6 25 3,813 2,369 13,501 2,139 37,907 4,824 2,065 9,386 5,285 2 2,422 24 19,183 5,805 10,609 192 124 40,738 -2,831 47,404 2045 12,613 4,009 4,203 666 6,608 6 26 3,712 2,167 13,186 2,139 36,150 4,877 2,044 9,354 5,116 2 2,385 23 18,924 5,032 10,605 192 120 39,749 -3,600 43,804 2046 12,063 4,009 3,357 679 6,620 7 27 3,617 1,994 12,944 2,139 34,513 4,586 2,027 9,344 5,113 2 2,338 22 18,846 4,440 10,597 192 120 38,781 -4,268 39,536 2047 13,045 4,009 7,889 703 6,645 9 27 3,579 2,012 12,976 2,139 40,058 4,639 1,985 9,272 5,094 2 2,348 20 18,721 5,171 10,620 192 122 39,465 593 40,129 2048 13,469 4,020 8,722 717 6,644 9 25 3,677 2,056 13,129 2,139 41,479 4,804 1,950 9,299 5,094 2 2,400 20 18,765 5,652 10,638 192 124 40,176 1,303 41,432 2049 16,117 4,009 20,186 719 6,662 7 21 4,121 2,504 14,034 2,139 56,486 5,544 1,910 9,211 5,120 2 2,640 24 18,908 8,621 10,655 192 133 44,053 12,433 53,865 2050 15,057 4,009 7,825 676 6,661 6 18 4,200 2,555 14,117 2,139 43,147 5,298 1,870 9,296 5,345 2 2,609 19 19,139 7,296 10,640 192 134 42,699 448 54,313 2051 17,364 4,009 15,080 688 6,699 6 19 4,225 2,980 14,617 2,139 53,209 5,404 1,952 9,237 5,310 2 2,656 23 19,180 10,033 10,657 192 141 45,607 7,602 61,914 2052 15,428 4,020 7,471 652 6,730 6 19 4,257 2,613 14,277 2,139 43,336 6,107 1,984 9,336 5,305 2 2,613 20 19,259 7,838 10,629 192 130 44,157 -821 61,093 2053 15,118 4,009 7,625 655 6,732 7 21 4,103 2,545 14,062 2,139 42,954 5,758 2,075 9,330 5,246 2 2,556 22 19,231 7,493 10,633 192 127 43,434 -480 60,614 2054 17,239 4,009 14,971 668 6,755 6 21 4,174 2,862 14,485 2,139 52,843 4,955 2,110 9,260 5,312 2 2,639 24 19,347 10,078 10,656 192 144 45,371 7,472 68,085 2055 15,011 4,009 6,458 645 6,734 6 20 4,253 2,465 14,122 2,139 41,740 5,644 2,124 9,323 5,388 2 2,605 21 19,462 7,692 10,626 192 137 43,753 -2,014 66,072 2056 14,730 4,020 6,041 647 6,789 7 23 4,115 2,466 14,046 2,139 40,976 5,846 2,166 9,407 5,387 2 2,548 21 19,531 6,783 10,614 192 126 43,093 -2,116 63,955 2057 14,518 4,009 5,559 647 6,748 6 25 3,940 2,483 13,849 2,139 40,074 5,131 2,187 9,372 5,344 2 2,477 21 19,403 6,730 10,625 192 127 42,209 -2,135 61,821 2058 12,801 4,009 3,545 657 6,745 6 26 3,841 2,237 13,512 2,139 36,006 5,290 2,183 9,406 5,251 2 2,414 22 19,278 5,168 10,606 192 120 40,654 -4,648 57,173 2059 13,513 4,009 5,957 672 6,732 6 27 3,706 2,218 13,361 2,139 38,979 4,735 2,157 9,345 5,282 2 2,397 22 19,204 5,677 10,618 192 125 40,551 -1,572 55,601 2060 12,683 4,020 4,733 691 6,742 7 27 3,684 2,052 13,203 2,139 36,778 4,978 2,138 9,393 5,200 2 2,373 21 19,126 4,968 10,614 192 120 39,998 -3,220 52,381 2061 15,279 4,009 14,869 706 6,711 7 25 3,853 2,383 13,685 2,139 49,982 4,890 2,099 9,249 5,149 2 2,496 22 19,017 7,701 10,653 192 133 42,586 7,396 59,777 2062 13,283 4,009 5,883 668 6,689 6 23 3,971 2,199 13,555 2,139 38,870 5,162 2,046 9,354 5,354 2 2,485 19 19,260 5,555 10,618 192 127 40,914 -2,044 57,733 2063 12,297 4,009 4,024 679 6,746 6 25 3,831 2,281 13,569 2,139 36,039 5,202 2,057 9,382 5,184 1 2,420 19 19,063 4,659 10,601 192 118 39,835 -3,796 53,936 2064 12,631 4,020 4,594 686 6,783 6 27 3,668 2,294 13,466 2,139 36,851 4,824 2,069 9,373 5,110 1 2,365 19 18,937 4,976 10,597 192 120 39,646 -2,796 51,140 2065 12,281 4,009 4,197 703 6,777 8 28 3,571 2,113 13,199 2,139 35,825 4,800 2,058 9,347 5,096 1 2,311 21 18,834 4,624 10,600 192 118 39,168 -3,343 47,798 2066 12,952 4,009 7,026 723 6,751 9 28 3,536 2,002 13,049 2,139 39,175 4,418 2,043 9,299 5,103 1 2,301 21 18,768 5,122 10,633 192 122 39,256 -81 47,717 2067 13,458 4,009 8,366 721 6,729 9 26 3,592 2,022 13,100 2,139 41,072 4,488 2,036 9,274 5,105 1 2,326 21 18,762 5,597 10,646 192 127 39,812 1,259 48,976 2068 12,170 4,020 4,298 717 6,741 8 26 3,655 1,918 13,065 2,139 35,692 4,734 2,019 9,355 5,181 1 2,320 19 18,895 4,460 10,609 192 120 39,010 -3,318 45,658 2069 11,722 4,009 3,765 729 6,770 8 27 3,551 2,060 13,145 2,139 34,779 4,394 2,001 9,313 5,054 1 2,279 18 18,665 4,150 10,596 190 117 38,112 -3,333 42,326 Average 14,009 4,012 7,861 729 6,633 9 22 3,778 2,308 13,478 2,139 41,500 4,831 1,786 9,264 5,094 2 2,409 21 18,576 6,326 10,620 189 127 40,670 830 - a
Water Year corresponds to October 1 of the previous year, through September 30th of the current year. b
Return flows consist of water that recharges the Subbasin via municipal distribution network leaks, septic system discharges, and infiltration of irrigation water C
Represents surface water diversions through the operation of YVWD-25 D
The YIHM calculates groundwater discharges to land surface when groundwater elevations in a given cell are higher than the top elevation of the cell Cumulative
Table 2C-13: Projected Future Baseline Water Budget
Water YearA
Individual Components of the Basin Water Budget Reported in Units of Acre-Feet (AF) Inflows to Groundwater System Outflows from Groundwater System Change in Groundwater in Storage
Stream
Leakage
Return
FlowsB
Precipitation
Recharge
Surface Water
Spreading
Subsurface Inflows Subsurface Outflows
Surface Water
DiversionsC ET
Total
Basin
Inflows
GW Discharges
to Streams GW Extractions GW Discharge to SurfaceD
Total Basin
Outflows Annual
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 787 of 1274 DRAFT
Future Baseline
(AFY)
Future Baseline with
Climate Change I
(AFY)
Future Baseline with
Climate Change II
(AFY)
11,812 11,732 14,009 13,257 12,295
2,829 4,012 4,012 4,012 4,012
6,101 5,491 7,861 7,290 6,496
From Beaumont Basin 1,315 960 729 755 795
From San Timoteo Basin 6,544 6,654 6,633 6,591 6,558
From SBBA 123 37 9 11 13
From Crafton Hills 32 24 22 22 23
From Yucaipa Hills 3,524 3,266 3,778 3,612 3,393
From San Bernardino Mountains 2,277 1,758 2,308 2,200 2,053 Total Subsurface Inflows 13,815 12,699 13,478 13,191 12,834 313 2,115 2,139 2,139 2,139
34,870 36,049 41,500 39,888 37,776
3,460 3,638 4,831 4,825 4,731
To Beaumont Basin 795 982 1,786 1,736 1,659
To San Timoteo Basin 9,109 9,169 9,264 9,246 9,188
To SBBA 4,011 4,453 5,094 4,910 4,630
To Crafton Hills 0 1 2 1 1
To Yucaipa Hills 2,272 2,162 2,409 2,325 2,211
To San Bernardino Mountains 20 19 21 21 21
Total Subsurface Outflows 16,207 16,786 18,576 18,240 17,710 3,984 4,127 6,326 5,448 4,538
217 191 189 188 180
11,346 8,668 10,621 10,611 10,589
23 133 127 119 112
35,237 33,542 40,670 39,432 37,859
Average Annual Change in Storage -367 2,506 830 457 -83 AFY = acre-feet per year
Return Flows
Precipitation Recharge Subsurface Inflows
Table 2C-14
Comparison of Average Annual Water Budget Components for the Historical, Current, and Projected Conditions Water Budget Component
Simulation Period
Current (AFY) Historical
(AFY)
Projected
Stream Leakage
GW Discharges to Streams
GW Extractions
GW Discharge to Surface
Average Annual Outflows
Surface Water Spreading
Average Annual Inflows Subsurface Outflows
ET
Surface Water Diversions
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 788 of 1274 DRAFT
From
Beaumont
Basin
From San
Timoteo
Basin
From SBBA From
Crafton Hills
From
Yucaipa Hills
From San
Bernardino
Mtns
Subtotal
To
Beaumont
Basin
To San
Timoteo
Basin
To SBBA To Crafton
Hills
To Yucaipa
Hills
To San
Bernardino
Mtns
Subtotal Annual Cumulative
2019 11,333 4,009 3,902 891 6,581 27 21 3,204 1,569 12,292 2,139 33,676 3,684 1,068 9,161 4,451 1 2,114 16 16,811 3,497 10,563 136 103 34,794 -1,118 -1,118 2020 11,178 4,020 4,560 894 6,571 26 21 3,150 1,739 12,400 2,139 34,298 3,820 1,088 9,175 4,555 1 2,106 17 16,941 3,617 10,555 153 117 35,203 -905 -2,024 2021 11,168 4,009 4,559 888 6,547 24 22 3,091 1,678 12,250 2,139 34,125 3,645 1,103 9,161 4,460 1 2,089 16 16,830 3,596 10,555 145 114 34,884 -759 -2,783 2022 12,035 4,009 7,682 892 6,531 23 21 3,152 1,741 12,360 2,139 38,225 4,074 1,122 9,115 4,638 1 2,120 19 17,016 4,127 10,577 185 115 36,094 2,132 -651 2023 12,396 4,009 8,043 880 6,510 19 20 3,218 1,798 12,445 2,139 39,032 3,765 1,140 9,116 4,692 1 2,147 19 17,115 4,380 10,588 190 119 36,157 2,875 2,224 2024 11,481 4,020 5,447 867 6,541 17 20 3,271 1,840 12,555 2,139 35,642 4,137 1,174 9,181 4,531 1 2,155 17 17,058 3,887 10,575 189 115 35,962 -320 1,904 2025 14,291 4,009 15,055 867 6,526 15 19 3,453 2,324 13,203 2,139 48,698 4,467 1,205 9,070 4,693 1 2,290 20 17,278 6,120 10,621 188 121 38,794 9,904 11,808 2026 12,388 4,009 6,309 826 6,523 11 17 3,628 2,230 13,235 2,139 38,081 4,769 1,212 9,158 4,680 1 2,303 20 17,375 4,780 10,612 192 118 37,845 235 12,043 2027 12,422 4,009 6,143 817 6,558 10 18 3,505 2,381 13,289 2,139 38,003 4,570 1,281 9,179 4,712 1 2,259 22 17,454 4,783 10,605 192 118 37,722 281 12,324 2028 11,721 4,020 4,495 812 6,605 11 20 3,423 2,233 13,104 2,139 35,480 4,673 1,360 9,212 4,638 1 2,219 22 17,451 4,202 10,594 192 112 37,226 -1,746 10,578 2029 12,976 4,009 6,744 809 6,550 12 21 3,335 2,247 12,974 2,139 38,842 3,965 1,410 9,166 4,882 1 2,202 22 17,683 5,164 10,623 192 120 37,747 1,095 11,674 2030 12,378 4,009 6,510 813 6,549 13 21 3,370 2,005 12,770 2,139 37,807 4,535 1,448 9,158 4,759 1 2,205 23 17,594 4,683 10,616 192 117 37,738 69 11,742 2031 11,838 4,009 4,740 803 6,526 13 21 3,350 1,917 12,630 2,139 35,355 4,018 1,487 9,178 4,755 1 2,183 21 17,625 4,249 10,596 192 118 36,797 -1,441 10,301 2032 12,392 4,020 5,716 801 6,556 13 22 3,295 1,924 12,610 2,139 36,877 4,084 1,513 9,182 4,748 1 2,162 21 17,627 4,300 10,586 192 116 36,905 -28 10,273 2033 12,067 4,009 6,550 806 6,514 13 22 3,297 2,015 12,667 2,139 37,432 4,518 1,530 9,162 4,750 1 2,176 20 17,640 4,408 10,593 192 119 37,471 -38 10,235 2034 15,581 4,009 19,261 818 6,490 12 19 3,669 2,480 13,488 2,139 54,478 4,923 1,529 9,090 4,835 2 2,400 23 17,878 7,614 10,645 192 126 41,378 13,100 23,335 2035 15,451 4,009 11,336 758 6,406 6 16 3,959 2,586 13,731 2,139 46,666 4,994 1,520 9,165 5,022 3 2,494 22 18,227 7,599 10,652 192 130 41,794 4,873 28,207 2036 17,238 4,020 16,588 761 6,477 6 16 4,162 2,877 14,299 2,139 54,284 5,799 1,608 9,193 5,034 3 2,611 23 18,472 9,216 10,653 192 131 44,463 9,820 38,028 2037 15,688 4,009 7,170 702 6,473 6 16 4,192 2,629 14,017 2,139 43,024 6,136 1,674 9,268 5,016 2 2,547 22 18,528 7,572 10,624 192 124 43,176 -153 37,875 2038 16,632 4,009 8,361 694 6,503 6 19 3,997 2,804 14,023 2,139 45,165 5,001 1,775 9,255 5,159 2 2,488 24 18,702 8,383 10,640 192 129 43,047 2,118 39,993 2039 17,515 4,009 11,890 695 6,517 6 19 4,012 2,882 14,132 2,139 49,686 5,190 1,853 9,219 5,273 2 2,520 26 18,894 9,710 10,663 192 138 44,787 4,899 44,892 2040 15,094 4,020 7,564 677 6,522 7 18 4,090 2,527 13,841 2,139 42,658 6,294 1,887 9,349 5,125 2 2,529 23 18,916 7,351 10,639 192 126 43,517 -859 44,032 2041 14,462 4,009 6,271 667 6,518 6 21 3,961 2,449 13,623 2,139 40,504 5,422 1,947 9,335 5,098 2 2,475 24 18,880 6,556 10,626 192 122 41,797 -1,293 42,739 2042 13,927 4,009 5,091 667 6,553 6 23 3,841 2,454 13,545 2,139 38,711 5,315 1,974 9,348 5,095 2 2,413 23 18,854 5,989 10,616 192 119 41,084 -2,372 40,367 2043 13,097 4,009 4,330 678 6,578 6 24 3,737 2,361 13,385 2,139 36,960 5,122 1,979 9,346 5,070 2 2,361 23 18,780 5,291 10,608 192 118 40,111 -3,150 37,216 2044 12,632 4,020 4,092 688 6,603 7 25 3,628 2,267 13,219 2,139 36,102 4,860 1,985 9,362 5,031 2 2,335 23 18,737 4,860 10,603 192 117 39,369 -3,267 33,949 2045 11,934 4,009 3,890 701 6,608 9 26 3,526 2,045 12,915 2,139 34,887 4,779 1,974 9,318 4,928 2 2,290 22 18,534 4,324 10,599 192 114 38,542 -3,655 30,294 2046 11,415 4,009 3,314 719 6,616 11 27 3,433 1,857 12,662 2,139 33,540 4,548 1,942 9,301 4,844 2 2,241 21 18,351 3,844 10,587 189 114 37,632 -4,092 26,202 2047 12,356 4,009 7,271 739 6,617 12 27 3,391 1,852 12,637 2,139 38,413 4,562 1,926 9,228 4,867 2 2,247 20 18,290 4,467 10,592 184 115 38,210 202 26,404 2048 12,649 4,020 7,655 755 6,635 12 25 3,461 1,892 12,781 2,139 39,245 4,770 1,898 9,259 4,920 2 2,287 19 18,386 4,772 10,617 192 117 38,853 391 26,795 2049 15,508 4,009 19,111 765 6,611 10 21 3,874 2,287 13,568 2,139 54,336 5,359 1,853 9,166 4,980 2 2,508 23 18,532 7,532 10,651 192 125 42,391 11,944 38,740 2050 13,764 4,009 7,509 715 6,578 6 19 3,994 2,428 13,739 2,139 41,161 5,220 1,821 9,273 5,094 2 2,499 19 18,708 5,950 10,630 192 125 40,825 336 39,076 2051 16,138 4,009 12,230 719 6,607 6 20 3,964 2,766 14,083 2,139 48,599 5,344 1,897 9,226 5,084 2 2,530 22 18,760 8,208 10,651 192 129 43,284 5,315 44,390 2052 14,323 4,020 6,511 691 6,621 6 20 3,967 2,511 13,816 2,139 40,809 5,766 1,922 9,340 5,078 2 2,484 20 18,846 6,454 10,623 192 120 42,002 -1,193 43,198 2053 14,116 4,009 7,486 695 6,627 6 22 3,859 2,479 13,688 2,139 41,438 5,504 1,970 9,312 5,052 2 2,444 22 18,801 6,305 10,629 192 118 41,550 -112 43,086 2054 16,470 4,009 14,193 703 6,629 6 21 3,930 2,749 14,039 2,139 50,851 4,917 2,015 9,254 5,185 2 2,521 23 19,000 8,658 10,654 192 133 43,555 7,295 50,381 2055 14,034 4,009 6,353 672 6,597 6 20 4,031 2,408 13,735 2,139 40,270 5,650 2,035 9,366 5,216 2 2,493 21 19,132 6,295 10,624 192 126 42,019 -1,749 48,632 2056 13,639 4,020 5,679 676 6,660 7 23 3,900 2,357 13,623 2,139 39,101 5,622 2,083 9,389 5,116 2 2,455 21 19,066 5,683 10,611 192 118 41,292 -2,191 46,441 2057 13,602 4,009 5,450 677 6,647 6 24 3,756 2,400 13,511 2,139 38,711 5,047 2,104 9,346 5,139 2 2,396 21 19,008 5,783 10,616 192 120 40,767 -2,056 44,385 2058 11,997 4,009 3,529 690 6,674 7 26 3,675 2,167 13,239 2,139 34,913 5,325 2,100 9,371 4,958 2 2,337 22 18,790 4,448 10,605 192 113 39,473 -4,560 39,825 2059 12,722 4,009 5,333 703 6,678 8 27 3,538 2,084 13,038 2,139 37,242 4,803 2,085 9,325 5,070 1 2,310 21 18,812 4,766 10,605 192 117 39,295 -2,054 37,772 2060 11,973 4,020 4,511 726 6,704 10 27 3,506 1,942 12,915 2,139 35,558 4,947 2,063 9,352 4,945 1 2,286 21 18,668 4,258 10,603 192 113 38,781 -3,223 34,548 2061 14,564 4,009 13,127 745 6,642 10 25 3,620 2,220 13,262 2,139 47,102 4,835 2,049 9,237 5,093 1 2,378 22 18,781 6,465 10,645 192 124 41,042 6,060 40,608 2062 12,461 4,009 5,412 710 6,624 7 24 3,748 2,008 13,121 2,139 37,142 5,123 2,006 9,315 5,021 1 2,370 19 18,732 4,733 10,615 192 118 39,514 -2,371 38,236 2063 11,391 4,009 3,727 718 6,693 7 25 3,618 2,101 13,161 2,139 34,427 5,104 2,015 9,319 4,816 1 2,310 19 18,481 3,881 10,599 188 111 38,364 -3,936 34,300 2064 11,866 4,020 4,276 733 6,743 9 27 3,483 2,179 13,174 2,139 35,475 4,662 2,012 9,307 4,950 1 2,272 19 18,562 4,142 10,595 191 113 38,264 -2,790 31,510 2065 11,604 4,009 3,969 743 6,734 11 27 3,387 1,983 12,885 2,139 34,607 4,637 2,003 9,279 4,860 1 2,216 20 18,380 3,934 10,589 191 111 37,843 -3,237 28,274 2066 12,372 4,009 6,476 756 6,693 12 27 3,344 1,899 12,732 2,139 37,727 4,321 1,993 9,235 4,879 1 2,200 22 18,330 4,458 10,605 191 116 38,021 -294 27,980 2067 12,985 4,009 8,252 761 6,674 12 26 3,407 1,912 12,791 2,139 40,177 4,494 1,965 9,216 4,940 1 2,226 22 18,370 4,935 10,629 192 120 38,741 1,436 29,416 2068 11,494 4,020 4,308 758 6,692 11 25 3,463 1,772 12,721 2,139 34,684 4,711 1,957 9,291 4,827 1 2,218 19 18,313 3,891 10,594 190 113 37,812 -3,128 26,287 2069 11,340 4,009 3,784 764 6,710 11 27 3,373 1,934 12,818 2,139 34,089 4,256 1,951 9,241 4,860 1 2,178 17 18,248 3,718 10,576 173 112 37,083 -2,993 23,294 Average 13,257 4,012 7,290 755 6,591 11 22 3,612 2,200 13,191 2,139 39,888 4,825 1,736 9,246 4,910 1 2,325 21 18,240 5,448 10,611 188 119 39,432 457 27,632 a
Water Year corresponds to October 1 of the previous year, through September 30th of the current year. b
Return flows consist of water that recharges the Subbasin via municipal distribution network leaks, septic system discharges, and infiltration of irrigation water C
Represents surface water diversions through the operation of YVWD-25 D
The YIHM calculates groundwater discharges to land surface when groundwater elevations in a given cell are higher than the top elevation of the cell Table 2C-15: Projected Future Baseline with Climate Change I Water Budget Water YearA
Individual Components of the Basin Water Budget Reported in Units of Acre-Feet (AF) Inflows to Groundwater System Outflows from Groundwater System Stream
Leakage
Return
FlowsB
Precipitation
Recharge
GW
Discharge to
SurfaceD
Total Basin
Outflows
Surface
Water
Spreading
GW
Discharges
to Streams
Total Basin
Inflows ET
Subsurface Inflows Change in Groundwater in
Storage Surface
Water
DiversionsC
Subsurface Outflows
GW
Extractions
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 789 of 1274 DRAFT
From
Beaumont
Basin
From San
Timoteo
Basin
From SBBA From
Crafton Hills
From
Yucaipa Hills
From San
Bernardino
Mtns
Subtotals To Beaumont
Basin
To San
Timoteo
Basin
To SBBA To Crafton
Hills
To Yucaipa
Hills
To San
Bernardino
Mtns
2019 11,195 4,009 3,839 891 6,592 27 21 3,209 1,558 11,407 2,139 33,480 3,984 1,070 9,164 4,363 1 2,114 16 3,367 10,562 131 100 34,871 -1,390 -1,390 2020 10,994 4,020 4,494 894 6,577 26 21 3,151 1,729 11,504 2,139 34,045 4,101 1,090 9,178 4,461 1 2,106 16 3,466 10,551 145 112 35,227 -1,181 -2,572 2021 10,823 4,009 3,982 888 6,560 25 22 3,090 1,650 11,347 2,139 33,189 3,936 1,099 9,162 4,326 1 2,082 16 3,341 10,549 132 109 34,753 -1,564 -4,135 2022 11,708 4,009 6,983 893 6,536 24 22 3,111 1,703 11,396 2,139 37,129 4,221 1,116 9,118 4,533 1 2,092 19 3,834 10,563 173 110 35,780 1,349 -2,786 2023 11,996 4,009 7,106 883 6,512 21 22 3,148 1,727 11,429 2,139 37,562 3,979 1,141 9,117 4,555 1 2,105 20 4,027 10,574 181 113 35,813 1,750 -1,037 2024 11,050 4,020 4,928 874 6,538 19 21 3,188 1,719 11,485 2,139 34,497 4,280 1,168 9,176 4,377 1 2,104 17 3,521 10,565 168 109 35,486 -989 -2,025 2025 13,393 4,009 13,363 878 6,525 17 20 3,322 2,116 12,000 2,139 45,783 4,522 1,190 9,061 4,568 1 2,215 20 5,226 10,602 172 114 37,692 8,091 6,066 2026 11,545 4,009 5,755 847 6,547 14 19 3,483 2,048 12,111 2,139 36,407 4,815 1,188 9,142 4,469 1 2,230 19 4,018 10,592 192 110 36,776 -368 5,697 2027 11,458 4,009 5,504 840 6,585 13 20 3,372 2,207 12,196 2,139 36,147 4,544 1,255 9,154 4,500 1 2,193 20 3,967 10,587 192 111 36,523 -376 5,321 2028 10,959 4,020 3,891 840 6,623 14 21 3,290 2,081 12,030 2,139 33,878 4,566 1,319 9,186 4,417 1 2,150 21 3,559 10,578 188 106 36,091 -2,213 3,108 2029 12,036 4,009 5,549 839 6,565 15 22 3,184 2,097 11,884 2,139 36,456 3,910 1,355 9,145 4,632 1 2,121 20 4,292 10,590 191 114 36,371 85 3,194 2030 11,669 4,009 5,687 841 6,554 16 22 3,202 1,849 11,644 2,139 35,990 4,480 1,404 9,128 4,562 1 2,109 22 3,992 10,587 192 110 36,588 -598 2,595 2031 10,989 4,009 3,950 846 6,535 16 23 3,169 1,725 11,467 2,139 33,400 4,051 1,416 9,150 4,449 1 2,079 20 3,537 10,565 184 111 35,562 -2,162 433 2032 11,754 4,020 5,077 839 6,534 16 24 3,109 1,709 11,392 2,139 35,221 4,056 1,449 9,141 4,531 1 2,061 20 3,674 10,555 164 109 35,761 -540 -106 2033 11,235 4,009 6,183 845 6,500 17 23 3,111 1,818 11,469 2,139 35,880 4,445 1,462 9,119 4,505 1 2,073 19 3,691 10,561 184 113 36,172 -292 -398 2034 14,384 4,009 16,767 857 6,449 15 21 3,401 2,228 12,114 2,139 50,270 4,737 1,456 9,060 4,679 1 2,274 20 6,226 10,621 188 118 39,380 10,890 10,492 2035 13,938 4,009 9,525 801 6,380 10 18 3,652 2,333 12,392 2,139 42,803 4,802 1,450 9,125 4,797 2 2,336 21 6,037 10,645 192 121 39,528 3,275 13,767 2036 15,500 4,020 14,073 814 6,458 8 17 3,822 2,737 13,042 2,139 49,589 5,568 1,517 9,145 4,781 2 2,435 26 7,308 10,646 192 120 41,741 7,848 21,615 2037 13,841 4,009 7,058 762 6,452 6 17 3,876 2,469 12,821 2,139 40,630 5,835 1,560 9,199 4,669 2 2,404 23 5,941 10,614 192 114 40,553 77 21,692 2038 15,276 4,009 7,815 749 6,501 6 19 3,717 2,633 12,876 2,139 42,863 5,003 1,650 9,185 4,860 1 2,358 24 6,883 10,621 192 119 40,899 1,964 23,656 2039 16,655 4,009 11,322 751 6,473 7 19 3,745 2,794 13,038 2,139 47,915 5,135 1,730 9,188 5,068 2 2,384 27 8,401 10,654 192 128 42,909 5,006 28,662 2040 13,859 4,020 7,046 725 6,470 6 19 3,839 2,476 12,810 2,139 40,599 6,048 1,766 9,308 4,773 2 2,397 25 6,161 10,620 192 116 41,408 -809 27,853 2041 13,120 4,009 5,546 718 6,483 6 21 3,716 2,396 12,622 2,139 38,154 5,316 1,819 9,274 4,826 2 2,347 23 5,339 10,606 192 113 39,857 -1,703 26,150 2042 12,695 4,009 4,747 717 6,541 7 23 3,611 2,388 12,569 2,139 36,876 5,222 1,860 9,274 4,746 2 2,296 23 4,938 10,598 192 112 39,262 -2,386 23,764 2043 11,973 4,009 3,964 726 6,578 9 24 3,507 2,304 12,422 2,139 35,233 5,078 1,866 9,267 4,701 2 2,252 24 4,367 10,592 192 111 38,450 -3,217 20,547 2044 11,685 4,020 3,687 741 6,607 11 25 3,426 2,133 12,202 2,139 34,475 4,750 1,878 9,285 4,653 2 2,222 23 4,053 10,587 192 110 37,754 -3,280 17,267 2045 11,172 4,009 3,435 757 6,594 12 26 3,315 1,895 11,842 2,139 33,354 4,643 1,873 9,241 4,617 2 2,173 21 3,654 10,574 188 107 37,094 -3,740 13,527 2046 10,811 4,009 3,111 768 6,594 14 27 3,222 1,703 11,558 2,139 32,397 4,422 1,859 9,224 4,530 2 2,124 21 3,339 10,556 166 107 36,350 -3,953 9,574 2047 11,694 4,009 6,241 786 6,572 15 27 3,166 1,688 11,468 2,139 36,337 4,352 1,831 9,158 4,628 2 2,124 22 3,860 10,558 165 109 36,809 -472 9,102 2048 11,939 4,020 6,858 803 6,575 16 26 3,218 1,724 11,559 2,139 37,318 4,603 1,820 9,198 4,667 2 2,146 22 4,052 10,579 188 110 37,386 -67 9,035 2049 14,675 4,009 17,715 812 6,522 14 22 3,600 2,067 12,225 2,139 51,575 5,156 1,778 9,101 4,750 2 2,362 25 6,402 10,629 191 117 40,513 11,062 20,097 2050 12,510 4,009 6,848 755 6,503 8 20 3,746 2,170 12,446 2,139 38,708 5,161 1,750 9,197 4,728 2 2,366 19 4,831 10,612 192 116 38,971 -264 19,833 2051 14,706 4,009 11,268 763 6,551 7 20 3,681 2,641 12,901 2,139 45,786 5,257 1,809 9,160 4,853 2 2,397 22 6,614 10,636 192 119 41,061 4,725 24,558 2052 13,029 4,020 6,060 743 6,594 7 21 3,720 2,443 12,785 2,139 38,777 5,610 1,826 9,255 4,771 1 2,371 21 5,284 10,612 192 113 40,057 -1,280 23,278 2053 12,890 4,009 6,466 742 6,596 7 22 3,604 2,398 12,627 2,139 38,872 5,368 1,865 9,223 4,766 1 2,322 22 5,175 10,610 192 111 39,655 -783 22,495 2054 15,156 4,009 11,652 750 6,573 8 22 3,637 2,621 12,861 2,139 46,567 4,810 1,903 9,194 4,928 1 2,376 23 7,041 10,644 192 123 41,237 5,330 27,825 2055 12,527 4,009 5,918 729 6,550 7 21 3,721 2,300 12,599 2,139 37,921 5,483 1,921 9,279 4,752 1 2,358 21 5,040 10,612 192 116 39,776 -1,855 25,970 2056 12,104 4,020 5,152 726 6,611 7 23 3,614 2,284 12,540 2,139 36,681 5,371 1,978 9,289 4,754 1 2,318 21 4,456 10,597 192 110 39,087 -2,406 23,564 2057 12,264 4,009 5,478 730 6,616 9 24 3,485 2,327 12,462 2,139 37,082 4,881 1,983 9,247 4,843 1 2,267 21 4,556 10,597 192 113 38,701 -1,619 21,945 2058 11,049 4,009 3,391 739 6,648 10 25 3,423 2,074 12,181 2,139 33,509 5,132 2,021 9,265 4,555 1 2,210 22 3,655 10,590 191 106 37,749 -4,240 17,705 2059 11,768 4,009 4,535 757 6,636 12 27 3,314 1,945 11,934 2,139 35,142 4,675 2,001 9,238 4,665 1 2,184 21 3,908 10,585 191 110 37,579 -2,437 15,269 2060 11,154 4,020 3,769 769 6,650 14 27 3,265 1,784 11,740 2,139 33,592 4,730 1,987 9,260 4,560 1 2,147 21 3,555 10,572 188 105 37,129 -3,537 11,732 2061 13,319 4,009 10,979 792 6,570 14 26 3,316 2,001 11,927 2,139 43,165 4,677 1,958 9,163 4,820 1 2,215 23 5,119 10,609 191 115 38,890 4,275 16,007 2062 11,394 4,009 4,762 765 6,577 12 24 3,427 1,789 11,829 2,139 34,898 4,907 1,925 9,215 4,568 1 2,205 20 3,835 10,589 191 110 37,565 -2,667 13,340 2063 10,540 4,009 3,482 772 6,633 12 25 3,322 1,827 11,820 2,139 32,762 4,788 1,929 9,207 4,459 1 2,157 19 3,184 10,565 153 104 36,565 -3,802 9,538 2064 11,054 4,020 3,755 783 6,654 14 27 3,216 1,962 11,872 2,139 33,624 4,394 1,918 9,214 4,570 1 2,131 19 3,437 10,559 152 106 36,502 -2,878 6,660 2065 10,773 4,009 3,241 793 6,637 15 27 3,139 1,808 11,626 2,139 32,582 4,401 1,905 9,186 4,456 1 2,082 19 3,293 10,551 152 104 36,149 -3,568 3,092 2066 11,545 4,009 5,310 799 6,594 16 27 3,083 1,731 11,452 2,139 35,253 4,161 1,892 9,141 4,573 1 2,055 22 3,692 10,555 169 108 36,369 -1,116 1,975 2067 12,087 4,009 7,040 805 6,561 16 26 3,123 1,734 11,460 2,139 37,540 4,310 1,883 9,134 4,648 1 2,067 24 4,011 10,573 184 111 36,947 594 2,569 2068 10,608 4,020 3,781 808 6,589 16 26 3,155 1,543 11,329 2,139 32,686 4,521 1,862 9,193 4,419 1 2,057 20 3,191 10,562 155 105 36,085 -3,400 -830 2069 10,557 4,009 3,195 812 6,569 16 27 3,081 1,588 11,280 2,139 31,993 4,063 1,846 9,154 4,440 1 2,013 17 3,106 10,548 106 105 35,399 -3,406 -4,237 Average 12,295 4,012 6,496 795 6,558 13 23 3,393 2,053 12,039 2,139 37,776 4,731 1,659 9,188 4,630 1 2,211 21 4,538 10,589 180 112 37,859 -83 11,589 A
Water Year corresponds to October 1 of the previous year, through September 30th of the current year.

B
Return flows consist of water that recharges the Subbasin via municipal distribution network leaks, septic system discharges, and infiltration of irrigation water C
Represents surface water diversions through the operation of YVWD-25 D
The YIHM calculates groundwater discharges to land surface when groundwater elevations in a given cell are higher than the top elevation of the cell Table 2C-16: Projected Future Baseline with Climate Change II Water Budget Water YearA
Individual Components of the Basin Water Budget Reported in Units of Acre-Feet (AF) Inflows to Groundwater System Outflows from Groundwater System Change in Groundwater in Storage
Stream
Leakage
Return
FlowsB
Precipitation
Recharge
GW
Discharge to
SurfaceD
Total Basin
Outflows Cumulative
Subsurface Outflows
GW
Discharges
to Streams
Surface
Water
DiversionsC
GW
Extractions
Subsurface Inflows
Surface Water
Spreading
Total Basin
Inflows ET Annual
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 790 of 1274 DRAFT
Group Name Model Component Parameter Description
A PRMS Solar Radiation and PET parameters
B PRMS, MODFLOW Soil zone and
C MODFLOW Hydraulic conductivity
D MODFLOW Storage properties
E MODFLOW General head and constant head boundary condition properties F MODFLOW Conductance parameters for faults and barriers to flow G MODFLOW Streambed conductivity
H MODFLOW Unsaturated zone parameters, including brook-corey exponent, extinction depths, and surface leakage conductances
Table 2C-17: Parameter groups included in YIHM Calibration and Sensitivity Analysis Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 791 of 1274 DRAFT
From
North
Bench MA
From
Crafton
Hills
From
SBBA
From
Calimesa
MA
From San.

Tim. MA
Subtotal To North
Bench MA
To
Crafton
Hills
To SBBA
To
Calimesa
MA
To San.

Tim. MA
Subtotal
1965 Normal 0 72 80 335 11 0 733 73 1,152 1,305 1 2,646 0 0 0 0 60 148 208 0 2,855 -1,550 -1,550 1966 Above Normal 0 72 251 343 10 0 731 96 1,181 1,505 8 2,741 0 0 0 0 45 148 194 0 2,943 -1,438 -2,988 1967 Wet 0 72 260 332 10 0 708 119 1,169 1,502 10 2,315 0 0 0 0 45 151 195 0 2,520 -1,018 -4,007 1968 Normal 0 73 199 332 10 0 685 141 1,167 1,440 0 2,580 0 0 0 0 46 156 202 0 2,782 -1,342 -5,349 1969 Wet 1 72 692 341 10 0 690 176 1,217 1,982 16 1,986 0 0 0 0 43 162 205 0 2,208 -225 -5,575 1970 Dry 0 321 360 333 9 0 710 172 1,225 1,906 2 2,186 0 0 0 0 38 169 208 0 2,396 -490 -6,064 1971 Below Normal 0 202 235 334 9 0 716 150 1,209 1,646 2 2,259 0 0 0 0 29 171 200 0 2,460 -814 -6,879 1972 Dry 0 202 168 338 9 0 706 139 1,192 1,562 1 2,831 0 0 0 0 24 171 195 0 3,026 -1,464 -8,343 1973 Above Normal 0 202 153 338 9 0 686 135 1,168 1,523 4 2,381 0 0 0 0 20 170 190 0 2,575 -1,052 -9,394 1974 Below Normal 0 202 220 316 9 0 718 136 1,180 1,602 8 2,473 0 0 0 0 19 170 189 0 2,670 -1,068 -10,462 1975 Normal 0 204 179 294 9 0 737 135 1,174 1,557 0 2,326 0 0 0 0 27 170 197 0 2,523 -966 -11,429 1976 Normal 0 207 205 289 9 0 753 135 1,186 1,597 4 2,351 0 0 0 0 30 171 201 0 2,556 -959 -12,388 1977 Below Normal 0 206 190 299 8 0 768 135 1,211 1,607 6 2,214 0 0 0 0 27 171 199 0 2,418 -811 -13,198 1978 Wet 1 206 789 296 8 0 786 169 1,260 2,256 17 2,382 0 1 0 0 38 172 211 0 2,612 -356 -13,554 1979 Above Normal 0 206 489 289 8 0 828 178 1,304 1,999 15 2,410 0 0 0 0 43 178 221 0 2,646 -648 -14,202 1980 Wet 1 76 738 286 8 0 866 188 1,349 2,164 17 2,267 0 0 0 0 48 181 229 0 2,514 -350 -14,552 1981 Dry 0 32 482 284 8 0 900 173 1,365 1,880 0 2,236 0 0 0 0 50 184 234 0 2,470 -590 -15,142 1982 Above Normal 0 32 384 286 8 0 926 159 1,379 1,795 12 2,121 0 0 0 0 41 182 223 0 2,356 -561 -15,703 1983 Wet 1 32 464 277 8 0 938 178 1,400 1,897 16 1,957 0 0 0 0 39 183 222 0 2,195 -298 -16,001 1984 Dry 0 32 353 276 8 0 982 173 1,439 1,824 0 2,429 0 0 0 0 45 186 232 0 2,661 -837 -16,838 1985 Below Normal 0 50 280 284 8 0 1,010 155 1,456 1,787 0 2,533 0 0 0 0 45 185 229 0 2,762 -975 -17,813 1986 Normal 0 56 215 290 8 0 1,056 150 1,503 1,774 0 2,626 0 0 0 0 39 183 222 0 2,848 -1,074 -18,887 1987 Dry 0 56 190 294 7 0 1,086 147 1,535 1,781 0 2,460 0 0 0 0 32 181 214 0 2,674 -894 -19,780 1988 Below Normal 0 56 164 294 7 0 1,105 146 1,552 1,772 0 2,591 0 0 0 0 29 181 210 0 2,801 -1,029 -20,809 1989 Below Normal 0 56 136 296 7 0 1,122 137 1,562 1,754 0 2,641 0 0 0 0 28 179 208 0 2,848 -1,094 -21,903 1990 Dry 0 158 130 298 7 0 1,146 133 1,584 1,873 0 2,926 0 0 0 0 33 177 210 0 3,136 -1,263 -23,167 1991 Above Normal 0 192 273 297 7 0 1,131 141 1,576 2,042 5 2,624 0 0 0 0 32 176 209 0 2,838 -796 -23,963 1992 Above Normal 0 193 340 290 7 0 1,109 151 1,557 2,090 12 2,476 0 0 0 0 37 178 215 0 2,704 -614 -24,576 1993 Wet 1 411 954 283 7 0 1,097 207 1,594 2,961 17 2,616 0 1 0 0 53 182 235 0 2,868 92 -24,484 1994 Below Normal 0 432 509 293 7 0 1,132 195 1,627 2,568 0 2,795 0 0 0 0 68 190 259 0 3,054 -487 -24,971 1995 Wet 1 561 672 299 7 0 1,114 185 1,605 2,839 17 2,733 0 1 0 0 58 191 249 0 2,999 -160 -25,131 1996 Dry 0 606 455 290 7 0 1,088 172 1,557 2,618 0 2,863 0 0 0 0 60 193 254 0 3,117 -499 -25,630 1997 Above Normal 0 604 350 289 7 0 1,070 147 1,512 2,467 9 2,876 0 0 0 0 64 189 253 0 3,138 -672 -26,302 1998 Wet 1 604 528 279 7 0 1,066 175 1,527 2,660 15 3,228 0 0 0 0 71 188 259 0 3,502 -842 -27,144 1999 Dry 0 604 396 277 7 0 1,073 179 1,536 2,536 0 2,842 0 0 0 0 85 192 278 0 3,120 -584 -27,728 2000 Dry 0 640 298 283 7 0 1,051 148 1,488 2,426 0 2,503 0 0 0 0 77 190 268 0 2,771 -345 -28,073 2001 Dry 0 649 266 258 7 0 1,037 141 1,442 2,358 0 2,359 0 0 0 0 91 186 278 0 2,637 -279 -28,352 2002 Critically Dry 0 649 226 249 7 0 1,023 135 1,414 2,289 0 2,466 0 0 0 0 100 184 284 0 2,751 -462 -28,814 2003 Above Normal 0 649 224 245 7 0 1,003 138 1,393 2,266 4 2,340 0 0 0 0 106 182 288 0 2,631 -365 -29,180 2004 Dry 0 651 205 243 7 0 988 140 1,377 2,233 0 2,386 0 0 0 0 108 182 291 0 2,676 -443 -29,622 2005 Wet 1 456 500 237 7 0 988 180 1,412 2,369 14 2,380 0 0 0 0 116 183 300 0 2,694 -326 -29,948 2006 Below Normal 0 391 340 236 7 0 979 182 1,403 2,134 0 2,537 0 0 0 0 123 189 312 0 2,848 -714 -30,662 2007 Critically Dry 0 391 219 242 6 0 986 153 1,388 1,998 0 2,759 0 0 0 0 125 188 313 0 3,072 -1,074 -31,736 2008 Normal 0 392 219 245 6 0 997 148 1,395 2,006 0 2,456 0 0 0 0 129 186 315 0 2,771 -765 -32,501 2009 Below Normal 0 391 210 245 6 0 980 146 1,377 1,978 0 1,961 0 0 0 0 123 184 307 0 2,268 -290 -32,791 2010 Above Normal 0 400 316 245 6 0 963 156 1,370 2,087 3 1,870 0 0 0 0 120 184 303 0 2,177 -90 -32,881 2011 Wet 1 403 419 246 6 0 949 174 1,376 2,198 5 1,943 0 0 0 0 118 186 304 0 2,251 -52 -32,934 2012 Dry 0 404 342 250 6 0 958 158 1,372 2,119 0 2,089 0 0 0 0 122 188 310 0 2,398 -280 -33,214 2013 Dry 0 403 261 255 6 0 978 144 1,383 2,047 0 2,077 0 0 0 0 126 185 311 0 2,389 -342 -33,555 2014 Dry 0 403 212 259 6 0 974 138 1,377 1,991 0 2,110 0 0 0 0 125 183 308 0 2,418 -426 -33,981 0 293 335 286 7.64 0 937 153 1,384 2,011 5 2,443 0 0 0 0 64 179 243 0 2,691 -680 0 520 223 245 7 0 1,005 144 1,401 2,143 0 2,613 0 0 0 0 113 186 299 0 2,912 -768 0 369 294 281 7 0 977 154 1,419 2,082 0 2,450 0 0 0 0 73 184 256 0 2,706 -624 0 221 254 289 8 0 948 154 1,397 1,872 2 2,445 0 0 0 0 55 180 235 0 2,681 -809 0 167 183 297 9 0 827 130 1,263 1,613 1 2,497 0 0 0 0 55 169 224 0 2,722 -1,109 0 283 309 291 8 0 939 145 1,382 1,975 8 2,427 0 0 0 0 56 176 233 0 2,668 -693 1 289 602 288 8 0 920 175 1,391 2,283 14 2,381 0 0 0 0 63 178 241 0 2,636 -354 Subsurface Outflows
Total
Outflows
Annual
Historical Average
Critically Dry Wate Year Avg
Dry Water Year Avg
Below Normal Water Year Avg
Normal Water Year Avg
Above Normal Water Year Avg
Wet Water Year Avg
Table 2C-18: Historical Water Budget for the Western Heights Management Area Water YearA Water Year TypeB
Inflows to Principal Aquifer Outflows from Principal Aquifer Change in Storage Stream
Leakage
Return
Flows
Precipitation
Recharge
Cumulative
Total
Inflows ET
GW
Production
GW
Discharge
to
Streams
GW
Discharge
to Surface
Subsurface Inflows
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 792 of 1274 DRAFT
From San
Bernardino
Mtns
From
Crafton
Hills
From
Yucaipa
Hills
From
SBBA near
Mill Creek
From San
Timoteo
Subbasin
From
Calimesa
From
Western
Heights
Subtotal
To San
Bernardino
Mtns
To
Crafton
Hills
To
Yucaipa
Hills
To SBB
near Mill
Creek
To San
Timoteo
Subbasin
To
Calimesa
To
Western
Heights
Subtotal
1965 Normal 1,829 1,992 1,253 0 1,455 36 2,510 263 436 14 0 4,714 9,787 1,092 2,477 0 2,006 13 0 1,910 238 12 2,088 335 4,598 5 10,178 -391 -391 1966 Above
Normal 2,400 1,992 3,456 0 1,596 35 2,568 242 429 17 0 4,885 12,733 1,377 3,049 31 2,371 14 0 1,940 272 14 2,101 343 4,685 6 11,518 1,215 823 1967 Wet 2,533 1,992 3,160 0 1,705 34 2,603 228 433 14 0 5,017 12,702 1,145 2,845 36 2,512 13 0 1,937 296 13 2,167 332 4,757 6 11,301 1,401 2,225 1968 Normal 2,045 1,997 1,695 0 1,837 34 2,610 223 434 14 0 5,151 10,889 1,294 3,026 16 2,242 13 0 1,927 307 13 2,210 332 4,802 5 11,385 -496 1,729 1969 Wet 3,943 1,992 7,782 0 2,374 33 2,745 203 426 14 0 5,795 19,511 1,450 3,048 127 3,564 15 0 2,047 337 15 2,247 341 5,001 8 13,197 6,314 8,043 1970 Dry 2,480 1,992 2,294 0 2,298 32 2,848 180 464 13 0 5,836 12,602 1,459 2,905 111 2,820 17 0 2,051 373 9 2,260 333 5,044 7 12,346 256 8,299 1971 elow Norm 2,629 1,991 2,122 0 2,453 32 2,727 168 456 14 0 5,851 12,592 1,375 2,544 142 2,826 18 0 2,037 389 11 2,292 334 5,082 7 11,975 617 8,916 1972 Dry 2,391 1,996 1,574 0 2,295 32 2,702 163 452 15 0 5,658 11,620 1,543 2,597 156 2,602 21 0 2,000 403 12 2,361 338 5,135 5 12,038 -418 8,498 1973 bove Norm 3,131 1,991 3,300 0 2,241 32 2,660 159 433 18 0 5,543 13,964 1,265 3,133 217 3,117 20 0 1,999 414 15 2,392 338 5,177 6 12,914 1,049 9,547 1974 elow Norm 2,755 1,991 2,425 0 2,070 31 2,754 155 434 14 0 5,457 12,628 1,466 4,030 206 2,851 20 0 1,987 429 15 2,387 316 5,155 6 13,715 -1,086 8,461 1975 Normal 2,380 2,008 1,501 0 2,021 31 2,731 151 439 14 0 5,386 11,276 1,220 3,326 133 2,523 19 0 1,959 440 14 2,339 294 5,065 6 12,273 -997 7,463 1976 Normal 2,546 2,020 2,031 0 2,077 31 2,678 150 436 15 0 5,387 11,984 1,282 3,257 88 2,490 18 0 1,942 442 15 2,295 289 5,001 5 12,123 -138 7,325 1977 elow Norm 2,436 2,015 2,199 0 2,093 31 2,659 154 434 15 0 5,385 12,035 1,269 3,075 100 2,505 19 0 1,936 427 16 2,266 299 4,963 6 11,918 118 7,443 1978 Wet 4,728 2,015 10,722 0 2,517 30 3,024 152 454 13 1 6,191 23,656 1,676 2,739 220 4,464 19 0 2,173 433 13 2,370 296 5,304 10 14,413 9,243 16,686 1979 bove Norm 4,251 2,015 5,736 0 2,618 27 3,267 133 502 14 0 6,561 18,562 1,606 2,621 267 4,350 23 0 2,268 485 6 2,494 289 5,565 12 14,421 4,142 20,828 1980 Wet 6,368 1,096 9,452 0 3,033 25 3,558 121 540 15 0 7,293 24,209 1,946 2,985 332 6,004 25 0 2,445 517 6 2,626 286 5,905 13 17,184 7,025 27,853 1981 Dry 4,625 783 2,421 0 2,842 24 3,571 113 574 20 0 7,145 14,975 1,980 3,148 286 4,537 27 0 2,383 529 7 2,639 284 5,869 11 15,832 -858 26,995 1982 bove Norm 5,447 783 4,215 0 2,987 25 3,395 113 561 19 0 7,099 17,544 1,570 2,579 299 5,135 30 0 2,334 527 8 2,637 286 5,822 11 15,416 2,128 29,123 1983 Wet 5,952 783 6,453 0 2,913 24 3,475 110 604 21 0 7,147 20,336 1,491 2,178 332 5,790 29 0 2,388 545 8 2,729 277 5,976 13 15,781 4,555 33,679 1984 Dry 3,832 786 2,961 0 2,581 22 3,589 102 603 23 0 6,919 14,498 1,964 2,287 279 4,004 27 0 2,392 575 8 2,858 276 6,137 10 14,680 -182 33,496 1985 elow Norm 4,068 1,102 2,597 0 2,555 22 3,480 96 583 24 0 6,761 14,528 1,852 2,233 268 4,014 27 0 2,362 583 9 2,913 284 6,179 9 14,554 -27 33,470 1986 Normal 3,841 1,209 2,007 0 2,505 22 3,393 91 581 25 0 6,617 13,674 1,754 2,337 257 3,815 26 0 2,306 592 9 2,864 290 6,087 8 14,258 -584 32,885 1987 Dry 3,192 1,209 1,376 0 2,385 22 3,308 90 576 24 0 6,406 12,182 1,637 2,255 230 3,287 24 0 2,263 596 8 2,817 294 6,003 7 13,419 -1,237 31,649 1988 elow Norm 3,007 1,212 1,387 0 2,304 23 3,223 93 572 25 0 6,240 11,846 1,499 2,366 218 3,132 23 0 2,224 590 8 2,817 294 5,957 6 13,178 -1,333 30,316 1989 elow Norm 2,612 1,209 1,289 0 2,122 23 3,137 100 558 24 0 5,964 11,074 1,576 2,653 194 2,831 22 0 2,180 569 8 2,781 296 5,856 5 13,116 -2,042 28,274 1990 Dry 2,390 852 760 0 1,953 23 3,065 108 553 22 0 5,724 9,726 1,429 2,926 172 2,607 21 0 2,140 549 7 2,773 298 5,789 5 12,928 -3,202 25,072 1991 bove Norm 3,110 732 3,831 0 1,959 24 3,066 118 539 22 0 5,726 13,400 1,533 3,343 198 3,032 19 0 2,158 524 9 2,783 297 5,790 5 13,902 -502 24,569 1992 bove Norm 3,166 734 3,882 0 1,986 24 3,174 121 546 20 0 5,870 13,652 1,613 3,575 235 3,268 18 0 2,216 518 7 2,770 290 5,820 7 14,518 -866 23,704 1993 Wet 5,274 733 11,331 0 2,434 22 3,597 122 585 18 1 6,780 24,119 1,935 3,095 302 5,152 22 0 2,451 514 6 2,796 283 6,072 11 16,567 7,552 31,255 1994 elow Norm 3,709 733 2,711 0 2,454 20 3,651 103 610 20 0 6,859 14,012 1,724 3,164 279 3,953 19 0 2,458 544 6 2,801 293 6,121 10 15,252 -1,239 30,016 1995 Wet 6,562 895 8,087 0 2,873 20 3,685 105 597 21 1 7,301 22,845 1,948 2,793 354 6,340 22 0 2,533 544 7 2,882 299 6,287 12 17,732 5,113 35,129 1996 Dry 4,661 952 2,519 0 2,530 19 3,733 91 614 23 0 7,009 15,141 2,191 3,056 330 4,825 21 0 2,503 591 7 3,000 290 6,412 9 16,822 -1,680 33,449 1997 bove Norm 4,618 950 3,170 0 2,470 19 3,601 82 587 24 0 6,781 15,518 2,103 3,322 305 4,609 22 0 2,460 611 7 3,037 289 6,426 8 16,773 -1,255 32,194 1998 Wet 6,527 950 8,059 0 2,743 18 3,692 79 614 22 0 7,169 22,704 1,762 3,279 347 6,395 23 0 2,532 633 7 3,063 279 6,537 12 18,331 4,373 36,567 1999 Dry 4,078 950 1,928 0 2,404 18 3,756 73 623 22 0 6,895 13,850 1,918 4,203 315 4,450 21 0 2,511 663 7 3,072 277 6,552 10 17,447 -3,597 32,971 2000 Dry 3,974 1,193 1,696 0 2,425 19 3,620 73 599 23 0 6,759 13,622 2,062 5,509 299 4,026 21 0 2,474 650 7 3,002 283 6,438 8 18,341 -4,718 28,252 2001 Dry 3,940 1,271 1,731 0 2,417 20 3,475 78 580 24 0 6,594 13,536 1,804 5,252 297 4,050 20 0 2,411 620 7 2,838 258 6,155 8 17,566 -4,030 24,223 2002 Critically Dry 2,801 1,271 747 36 2,206 22 3,412 83 567 22 0 6,312 11,168 1,817 5,560 235 3,178 21 0 2,349 601 7 2,704 249 5,930 6 16,727 -5,560 18,663 2003 bove Norm 3,302 1,271 2,166 691 2,133 23 3,298 92 558 23 0 6,128 13,558 1,633 5,117 242 3,423 20 0 2,319 576 7 2,563 245 5,730 13 16,158 -2,600 16,063 2004 Dry 2,802 1,274 1,562 624 1,988 24 3,285 100 552 21 0 5,970 12,232 1,774 5,443 215 3,072 17 0 2,299 559 6 2,441 243 5,565 15 16,083 -3,851 12,211 2005 Wet 4,813 2,339 8,047 135 2,257 23 3,471 100 560 19 0 6,430 21,765 1,819 5,426 276 4,773 19 0 2,408 566 6 2,367 237 5,605 12 17,912 3,853 16,064 2006 elow Norm 2,942 2,700 2,113 17 2,152 22 3,555 84 582 18 0 6,413 14,184 1,795 5,187 239 3,373 17 0 2,411 611 6 2,347 236 5,628 8 16,230 -2,046 14,019 2007 Critically Dry 2,484 2,700 1,115 4 2,284 22 3,393 77 568 22 0 6,366 12,669 1,866 4,999 199 2,918 17 0 2,359 620 7 2,303 242 5,548 6 15,535 -2,866 11,153 2008 Normal 3,082 2,707 2,101 551 2,292 23 3,250 79 558 22 0 6,223 14,664 1,886 3,967 218 3,289 17 0 2,319 615 7 2,285 245 5,488 12 14,859 -195 10,958 2009 elow Norm 2,989 2,700 2,290 1,337 2,096 22 3,178 78 546 17 0 5,937 15,252 1,957 3,679 215 3,252 17 0 2,262 625 6 2,273 245 5,430 33 14,566 686 11,644 2010 bove Norm 4,099 3,347 4,485 3,549 1,985 22 3,187 73 526 16 0 5,809 21,289 1,954 3,956 236 4,187 18 0 2,253 666 8 2,291 245 5,482 107 15,921 5,367 17,011 2011 Wet 4,414 3,565 5,436 3,071 2,000 21 3,254 60 536 14 0 5,885 22,371 2,041 3,737 254 4,513 17 0 2,282 738 6 2,472 246 5,761 122 16,428 5,943 22,954 2012 Dry 3,216 3,575 2,564 2,936 1,886 20 3,291 45 544 13 0 5,799 18,091 2,154 3,806 209 3,622 16 0 2,280 809 6 2,683 250 6,045 93 15,929 2,161 25,115 2013 Dry 2,988 3,565 2,188 2,170 2,030 19 3,191 38 537 17 0 5,831 16,741 2,041 3,530 182 3,312 16 0 2,242 847 6 2,828 255 6,195 75 15,334 1,407 26,522 2014 Dry 2,634 3,565 1,541 521 2,005 18 3,100 35 529 16 0 5,703 13,964 1,933 4,560 176 2,899 16 0 2,204 867 6 2,996 259 6,348 25 15,941 -1,977 24,545 3,600 1,714 3,429 313 2,277 25 3,204 117 533 19 0 6,174 15,230 1,690 3,444 217 3,686 20 0 2,244 539 9 2,586 286 5,685 16 14,739 491 2,643 1,985 931 20 2,245 22 3,402 80 568 22 0 6,339 11,919 1,841 5,280 217 3,048 19 0 2,354 610 7 2,503 245 5,739 6 16,131 -4,213 3,372 1,712 1,937 447 2,289 22 3,324 92 557 20 0 6,303 13,770 1,849 3,677 233 3,579 20 0 2,297 616 8 2,755 281 5,978 20 15,336 -1,566 3,016 1,739 2,126 150 2,255 25 3,152 115 531 19 0 6,096 13,128 1,612 3,215 207 3,193 20 0 2,206 530 9 2,542 289 5,597 10 13,834 -706 2,621 1,989 1,765 92 2,031 29 2,862 159 481 17 0 5,580 12,046 1,421 3,065 119 2,727 18 0 2,061 439 12 2,347 297 5,173 7 12,513 -467 3,725 1,535 3,804 471 2,219 25 3,135 126 520 19 0 6,045 15,580 1,628 3,411 226 3,721 20 0 2,216 510 9 2,563 291 5,611 19 14,616 964 5,111 1,636 7,853 321 2,485 25 3,310 128 535 17 0 6,501 21,422 1,721 3,212 258 4,951 20 0 2,319 512 9 2,572 288 5,720 22 15,885 5,537 Dry Water Year Avg
ow Normal Water Year
Normal Water Year Avg
Table 2C-19: Historical Water Budget for the North Bench Management Area Surface
Water
Diversions
Total
Inflows ET GW Production
GW
Discharge
to Streams
GW
Discharge
to Surface
Total
Outflows
Annual Cumulative
ve Normal Water Year
Wet Water Year Avg
Historical Average
tically Dry Wate Year A
Water Subsurface Outflows
Year
Water
Year Type
Inflows to Principal Aquifer Outflows from Principal Aquifer Change in Groundwater in
Storage
Stream
Leakage
Return
Flows
Precipitation
Recharge
Surface
Water
Spreading
Subsurface Inflows
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 793 of 1274 DRAFT
From
Yucaipa
Hills
From
North
Bench
From
Western
Heights
From
Beaumont
Basin
From San
Timoteo
MA
From San
Timoteo
subbasin
Subtotal
To
Yucaipa
Hills
To North
Bench
To
Western
Heigths
To
Beaumont
Basin
To San
Timoteo
Subbasin
To San
Timoteo
MA
Subtotal
1965 Normal 419 36 798 222 2,088 60 1,660 11 322 4,363 5,616 132 3,814 30 15 14 733 565 34 524 1,885 1 5,862 -246 -246 1966
Above
Normal 427 36 1,157 223 2,101 45 1,754 16 313 4,451 6,071 146 4,915 31 18 17 731 568 42 525 1,901 1 6,994 -923 -1,170 1967 Wet 441 36 1,193 230 2,167 45 1,855 17 268 4,581 6,251 143 5,326 35 17 14 708 588 46 522 1,896 1 7,401 -1,151 -2,320 1968 Normal 422 36 1,095 251 2,210 46 1,878 14 256 4,655 6,208 153 5,173 33 18 14 685 604 47 505 1,874 1 7,234 -1,026 -3,346 1969 Wet 442 36 2,328 271 2,247 43 1,915 28 247 4,751 7,556 161 4,341 40 25 14 690 601 56 515 1,902 1 6,445 1,111 -2,235 1970 Dry 456 199 1,589 339 2,260 38 1,822 15 224 4,698 6,941 184 4,574 39 21 13 710 578 56 497 1,875 2 6,674 267 -1,969 1971 elow Norm 441 244 1,494 348 2,292 29 1,875 12 250 4,806 6,984 175 4,866 38 21 14 716 576 54 482 1,863 2 6,943 40 -1,928 1972 Dry 396 244 1,368 315 2,361 24 1,896 11 261 4,867 6,877 179 5,207 33 20 15 706 589 53 473 1,855 2 7,275 -399 -2,327 1973 bove Norm 420 244 1,492 292 2,392 20 1,875 11 267 4,856 7,012 152 4,705 38 20 18 686 588 47 461 1,820 2 6,717 295 -2,032 1974 elow Norm 416 197 1,525 282 2,387 19 1,812 12 262 4,774 6,912 169 4,794 36 20 14 718 578 51 460 1,842 1 6,842 70 -1,963 1975 Normal 397 354 1,452 275 2,339 27 1,660 12 258 4,571 6,774 152 4,659 36 17 14 737 559 48 459 1,835 1 6,684 90 -1,872 1976 Normal 368 410 1,511 281 2,295 30 1,506 11 276 4,399 6,688 157 4,572 34 19 15 753 542 48 457 1,834 1 6,598 90 -1,782 1977 elow Norm 388 409 1,644 270 2,266 27 1,410 11 274 4,257 6,698 163 4,427 36 20 15 768 527 50 456 1,835 1 6,463 236 -1,546 1978 Wet 425 409 3,497 288 2,370 38 1,591 79 215 4,581 8,912 186 4,660 45 33 13 786 535 64 454 1,886 2 6,778 2,134 588 1979 bove Norm 454 409 2,754 375 2,494 43 1,540 34 195 4,681 8,298 200 4,519 54 29 14 828 541 61 458 1,930 3 6,706 1,592 2,180 1980 Wet 459 2,085 4,319 400 2,626 48 1,292 24 184 4,574 11,437 248 4,500 61 40 15 866 501 70 506 1,999 4 6,811 4,626 6,806 1981 Dry 458 2,640 3,492 458 2,639 50 908 12 173 4,240 10,830 291 4,544 53 36 20 900 459 62 512 1,990 5 6,882 3,948 10,754 1982 bove Norm 454 2,640 3,493 428 2,637 41 646 9 194 3,954 10,541 262 3,952 55 36 19 926 435 59 521 1,997 5 6,271 4,270 15,024 1983 Wet 450 2,640 3,759 382 2,729 39 521 8 165 3,843 10,693 322 4,025 63 39 21 938 433 64 538 2,034 6 6,451 4,242 19,266 1984 Dry 456 2,648 2,943 389 2,858 45 426 8 158 3,885 9,931 498 5,413 52 37 23 982 423 63 557 2,084 6 8,053 1,878 21,144 1985 elow Norm 450 4,128 3,089 381 2,913 45 398 7 176 3,919 11,587 519 5,645 50 40 24 1,010 418 60 577 2,129 7 8,350 3,237 24,381 1986 Normal 449 4,630 3,071 349 2,864 39 269 6 167 3,694 11,844 561 4,740 69 37 25 1,056 493 58 607 2,274 9 7,653 4,191 28,572 1987 Dry 449 4,630 2,354 332 2,817 32 206 5 156 3,549 10,981 693 5,172 94 36 24 1,086 494 56 636 2,332 10 8,301 2,681 31,252 1988 elow Norm 446 4,642 1,937 310 2,817 29 175 5 152 3,488 10,513 736 5,764 106 36 25 1,105 547 51 664 2,427 12 9,045 1,467 32,720 1989 elow Norm 433 4,630 1,694 296 2,781 28 162 4 153 3,425 10,182 790 5,811 104 35 24 1,122 594 54 681 2,509 13 9,226 955 33,675 1990 Dry 417 1,180 933 284 2,773 33 222 5 181 3,497 6,028 734 5,601 92 29 22 1,146 591 46 681 2,516 12 8,955 -2,927 30,748 1991 bove Norm 433 17 1,074 268 2,783 32 428 6 231 3,748 5,272 632 5,512 72 27 22 1,131 448 45 656 2,330 8 8,554 -3,281 27,467 1992 bove Norm 446 17 1,291 257 2,770 37 604 7 246 3,920 5,674 592 5,536 57 27 20 1,109 423 50 641 2,270 6 8,461 -2,787 24,679 1993 Wet 452 27 3,138 281 2,796 53 752 31 225 4,138 7,756 582 5,611 72 36 18 1,097 456 57 672 2,336 7 8,608 -853 23,827 1994 elow Norm 455 28 2,025 372 2,801 68 746 10 266 4,264 6,771 525 5,834 43 33 20 1,132 477 51 615 2,329 7 8,738 -1,967 21,860 1995 Wet 453 31 2,676 361 2,882 58 708 15 283 4,307 7,468 461 6,186 49 33 21 1,114 512 61 600 2,342 7 9,045 -1,577 20,283 1996 Dry 458 32 1,725 381 3,000 60 742 10 308 4,502 6,718 448 6,770 27 28 23 1,088 495 58 570 2,262 6 9,513 -2,795 17,488 1997 bove Norm 455 32 1,561 365 3,037 64 837 9 350 4,661 6,709 383 6,831 22 29 24 1,070 509 53 547 2,232 5 9,473 -2,763 14,724 1998 Wet 453 32 2,779 344 3,063 71 980 16 334 4,808 8,073 330 5,854 32 36 22 1,066 501 58 544 2,228 5 8,450 -377 14,347 1999 Dry 459 32 2,017 375 3,072 85 1,026 11 331 4,901 7,409 352 6,871 29 26 22 1,073 510 55 518 2,205 5 9,462 -2,053 12,294 2000 Dry 457 33 1,742 391 3,002 77 1,145 9 378 5,003 7,236 358 6,830 21 31 23 1,051 541 54 501 2,201 4 9,415 -2,179 10,115 2001 Dry 455 34 1,391 361 2,838 91 972 9 380 4,650 6,530 312 6,578 21 26 24 1,037 618 51 485 2,242 4 9,156 -2,626 7,489 2002 Critically Dry 455 34 1,044 335 2,704 100 863 9 408 4,419 5,951 293 7,175 19 24 22 1,023 776 47 476 2,367 3 9,857 -3,906 3,584 2003 bove Norm 454 34 902 308 2,563 106 941 10 431 4,358 5,747 258 6,910 22 25 23 1,003 770 45 464 2,331 2 9,523 -3,777 -193 2004 Dry 453 34 911 296 2,441 108 929 10 432 4,217 5,615 236 6,242 19 24 21 988 1,053 48 452 2,586 2 9,085 -3,470 -3,663 2005 Wet 451 35 2,106 286 2,367 116 936 22 412 4,139 6,730 217 5,711 29 34 19 988 1,010 58 456 2,564 2 8,522 -1,792 -5,454 2006 elow Norm 457 35 1,628 339 2,347 123 920 15 406 4,150 6,271 203 5,751 23 25 18 979 1,135 53 430 2,639 3 8,619 -2,348 -7,802 2007 Critically Dry 455 35 1,153 348 2,303 125 932 12 451 4,172 5,815 193 5,407 19 24 22 986 1,455 54 411 2,952 2 8,573 -2,758 -10,560 2008 Normal 455 35 1,513 330 2,285 129 944 12 458 4,157 6,160 185 4,972 22 24 22 997 1,002 51 400 2,495 2 7,676 -1,516 -12,076 2009 elow Norm 453 35 1,268 304 2,273 123 959 12 445 4,117 5,873 186 4,532 25 22 17 980 689 49 392 2,147 2 6,892 -1,019 -13,095 2010 bove Norm 453 39 1,439 278 2,291 120 933 16 424 4,062 5,993 163 4,574 27 22 16 963 669 52 392 2,115 2 6,882 -889 -13,984 2011 Wet 454 41 1,866 270 2,472 118 884 21 398 4,162 6,522 171 4,159 30 22 14 949 652 54 395 2,086 2 6,447 74 -13,910 2012 Dry 458 41 1,620 293 2,683 122 823 16 383 4,319 6,437 187 4,279 29 20 13 958 674 49 385 2,101 2 6,598 -161 -14,070 2013 Dry 450 41 1,469 301 2,828 126 763 15 391 4,423 6,383 173 4,734 27 21 17 978 763 50 380 2,208 2 7,143 -761 -14,831 2014 Dry 434 41 1,567 298 2,996 125 721 15 399 4,554 6,596 169 5,227 24 19 16 974 931 51 375 2,365 1 7,786 -1,191 -16,021 442 812 1,918 320 2,586 64 1,035 14 290 4,310 7,481 314 5,276 42 27 19 937 620 53 510 2,165 4 7,802 -320 455 34 1,098 341 2,503 113 897 11 429 4,295 5,883 243 6,291 19 24 22 1,005 1,116 50 444 2,659 3 9,215 -3,332 447 845 1,794 344 2,755 73 900 11 297 4,379 7,465 344 5,574 40 27 20 977 623 54 501 2,201 4 8,164 -699 438 1,594 1,812 322 2,542 55 940 10 265 4,133 7,977 385 5,269 51 28 19 948 616 53 529 2,191 5 7,902 75 418 917 1,573 285 2,347 55 1,319 11 290 4,307 7,215 223 4,655 37 22 17 827 628 48 492 2,033 3 6,951 264 444 385 1,685 310 2,563 56 1,062 13 295 4,299 6,813 310 5,273 42 26 19 939 550 51 518 2,103 4 7,731 -918 448 537 2,766 311 2,572 63 1,143 26 273 4,389 8,140 282 5,037 46 32 17 920 579 59 520 2,127 4 7,496 644 GW
Production
GW
Discharge
to Streams
GW
Discharge
to Surface
Water
Year
Water
Year Type
Inflows to Principal Aquifer
ow Normal Water Year
Normal Water Year Avg
ve Normal Water Year
Total
Inflows ET
Table 2C-20: Historical Water Budget for the Calimesa Management Area Wet Water Year Avg
Subsurface Inflows Subsurface Outflows
Total
Outflows Annual
Outflows from Principal Aquifer Change in Groundwater in Storage Stream
Leakage
Return
Flows
Precipitation
Recharge Cumulative
Historical Average
tically Dry Wate Year A
Dry Water Year Avg
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 794 of 1274 DRAFT
From
Beaumon
t Basin
From San
Timoteo
Subbasin
From
SBBA
From
Western
Heights
From
Calimesa
Total
Subsurface
Inflows
To
Beaumon
t Basin
To San
Timoteo
Subbasin
To SBBA
To
Western
Heights
To
Calimesa
To
Subsurfac
e
Outflows
1965 Normal 7,169 1 77 363 5,753 6 148 524 6,794 14,041 1,115 962 163 175 8,933 3,042 73 11 12,236 2 14,477 -436 -436 1966 Above
Normal 7,614 1 289 361 5,708 6 148 525 6,748 14,652 1,166 904 228 173 8,898 3,192 96 16 12,376 2 14,675 -23 -459 1967 Wet 7,681 1 344 356 5,681 6 151 522 6,717 14,742 1,101 571 246 172 8,886 3,220 119 17 12,414 2 14,334 408 -51 1968 Normal 7,220 1 176 354 5,689 6 156 505 6,710 14,107 1,164 327 147 170 8,914 3,049 141 14 12,288 1 13,928 179 129 1969 Wet 8,035 1 1,076 336 5,627 6 162 515 6,647 15,759 1,193 283 363 164 8,801 3,313 176 28 12,483 2 14,324 1,434 1,563 1970 Dry 7,405 3 315 326 5,624 6 169 497 6,622 14,345 1,280 195 159 159 8,893 3,117 172 15 12,356 2 13,992 352 1,915 1971 elow Norm 7,313 3 237 330 5,621 6 171 482 6,609 14,161 1,222 181 175 157 8,916 3,123 150 12 12,358 2 13,938 223 2,139 1972 Dry 7,215 3 191 327 5,643 6 171 473 6,620 14,029 1,281 185 148 158 8,952 3,091 139 11 12,351 2 13,966 63 2,201 1973 bove Norm 7,361 3 196 321 5,586 6 170 461 6,544 14,104 1,058 191 237 158 8,941 3,251 135 11 12,495 3 13,984 120 2,322 1974 elow Norm 7,491 3 288 316 5,571 6 170 460 6,523 14,306 1,246 187 221 158 8,935 3,259 136 12 12,501 2 14,157 149 2,470 1975 Normal 7,281 4 184 314 5,565 6 170 459 6,515 13,984 1,173 189 189 158 8,947 3,200 135 12 12,452 2 14,005 -21 2,450 1976 Normal 7,616 5 304 314 5,569 6 171 457 6,517 14,442 1,219 187 223 160 8,958 3,267 135 11 12,530 2 14,161 281 2,731 1977 elow Norm 7,273 5 205 311 5,539 6 171 456 6,483 13,966 1,315 190 176 160 8,954 3,205 135 11 12,465 2 14,148 -182 2,548 1978 Wet 8,141 5 1,137 292 5,540 6 172 454 6,465 15,748 1,257 222 400 160 8,854 3,463 169 79 12,725 3 14,606 1,142 3,690 1979 bove Norm 7,949 5 445 305 5,554 6 178 458 6,500 14,898 1,251 214 271 157 8,950 3,482 178 34 12,801 3 14,540 358 4,048 1980 Wet 8,348 21 1,167 288 5,626 6 181 506 6,606 16,142 1,340 323 384 153 8,933 3,500 188 24 12,799 3 14,848 1,294 5,342 1981 Dry 7,850 26 443 280 5,666 6 184 512 6,647 14,966 1,588 269 184 153 9,014 3,323 173 12 12,675 2 14,718 248 5,590 1982 bove Norm 8,086 26 454 281 5,697 6 182 521 6,687 15,254 1,308 228 300 157 9,013 3,577 159 9 12,914 3 14,753 501 6,091 1983 Wet 8,281 26 481 268 5,688 6 183 538 6,684 15,472 1,281 192 331 165 9,028 3,703 178 8 13,082 4 14,889 582 6,673 1984 Dry 7,892 27 325 257 5,715 6 186 557 6,722 14,965 1,655 149 201 174 9,113 3,430 173 8 12,898 2 14,906 59 6,733 1985 elow Norm 7,817 57 309 255 5,708 6 185 577 6,730 14,913 1,503 122 233 183 9,093 3,498 155 7 12,936 3 14,797 115 6,848 1986 Normal 7,733 67 274 245 5,711 6 183 607 6,751 14,825 1,542 120 222 192 9,109 3,450 150 6 12,907 3 14,793 31 6,879 1987 Dry 7,648 67 250 232 5,698 6 181 636 6,753 14,717 1,547 100 212 204 9,115 3,441 147 5 12,911 3 14,773 -56 6,823 1988 elow Norm 7,656 67 233 224 5,688 6 181 664 6,763 14,720 1,503 135 221 215 9,138 3,468 146 5 12,972 3 14,833 -114 6,709 1989 elow Norm 7,556 67 218 220 5,664 6 179 681 6,750 14,590 1,519 161 208 224 9,104 3,435 137 4 12,905 2 14,795 -204 6,505 1990 Dry 7,478 17 201 220 5,658 6 177 681 6,742 14,438 1,525 173 193 232 9,102 3,364 133 5 12,835 2 14,728 -290 6,215 1991 bove Norm 7,731 1 499 226 5,660 6 176 656 6,725 14,955 1,457 179 299 234 9,030 3,507 141 6 12,918 3 14,856 99 6,314 1992 bove Norm 7,777 1 398 228 5,673 6 178 641 6,726 14,902 1,446 156 270 233 9,074 3,564 151 7 13,029 3 14,903 -1 6,313 1993 Wet 8,406 2 1,584 202 5,672 6 182 672 6,734 16,726 1,454 158 482 227 8,974 3,612 207 31 13,051 4 15,150 1,576 7,889 1994 elow Norm 8,037 2 398 218 5,685 6 190 615 6,715 15,151 1,567 154 237 219 9,090 3,601 195 10 13,115 3 15,075 76 7,966 1995 Wet 8,299 2 924 228 5,739 6 191 600 6,764 15,988 1,450 158 425 212 9,020 3,683 185 15 13,115 4 15,152 836 8,802 1996 Dry 7,943 2 371 233 5,800 6 193 570 6,802 15,117 1,713 152 217 206 9,145 3,604 172 10 13,137 3 15,222 -106 8,696 1997 bove Norm 7,823 2 361 250 5,831 6 189 547 6,823 15,009 1,645 155 264 200 9,123 3,619 147 9 13,097 3 15,164 -155 8,541 1998 Wet 8,374 2 888 246 5,828 6 188 544 6,813 16,076 1,358 150 443 195 9,072 3,831 175 16 13,288 4 15,244 832 9,373 1999 Dry 8,003 2 382 248 5,830 6 192 518 6,795 15,182 1,707 149 240 189 9,165 3,675 179 11 13,220 3 15,319 -137 9,236 2000 Dry 7,872 2 307 264 5,890 6 190 501 6,852 15,033 1,756 146 232 186 9,199 3,627 148 9 13,168 3 15,304 -271 8,965 2001 Dry 7,851 2 277 269 5,880 6 186 485 6,827 14,957 1,582 141 268 182 9,163 3,738 141 9 13,232 3 15,227 -270 8,695 2002 Critically Dry 7,640 2 228 273 5,889 6 184 476 6,828 14,697 1,754 144 203 179 9,180 3,526 135 9 13,029 3 15,133 -436 8,259 2003 bove Norm 7,834 2 297 278 5,857 6 182 464 6,787 14,920 1,540 146 277 176 9,154 3,717 138 10 13,195 3 15,161 -241 8,018 2004 Dry 7,683 2 248 283 5,864 6 182 452 6,788 14,721 1,639 145 226 171 9,178 3,596 140 10 13,096 3 15,109 -388 7,630 2005 Wet 8,296 1 967 269 5,823 6 183 456 6,738 16,002 1,433 44 447 163 9,048 3,846 180 22 13,259 4 15,188 814 8,444 2006 elow Norm 7,910 1 368 272 5,819 6 189 430 6,716 14,995 1,687 4 232 155 9,144 3,637 182 15 13,133 3 15,059 -64 8,380 2007 Critically Dry 7,641 1 258 286 5,846 6 188 411 6,737 14,637 1,764 0 195 149 9,160 3,482 153 12 12,956 2 14,918 -281 8,099 2008 Normal 7,747 1 266 290 5,861 6 186 400 6,744 14,757 1,594 0 244 146 9,168 3,661 148 12 13,134 3 14,975 -217 7,882 2009 elow Norm 7,670 1 237 292 5,835 6 184 392 6,708 14,617 1,625 0 226 143 9,145 3,589 146 12 13,035 3 14,888 -272 7,610 2010 bove Norm 7,863 1 447 289 5,803 6 184 392 6,674 14,986 1,514 0 314 141 9,105 3,657 156 16 13,074 3 14,905 81 7,691 2011 Wet 8,056 1 663 277 5,774 6 186 395 6,638 15,358 1,523 0 349 139 9,085 3,744 174 21 13,163 4 15,039 319 8,010 2012 Dry 7,729 1 309 278 5,794 6 188 385 6,651 14,690 1,725 0 212 138 9,172 3,547 158 16 13,030 3 14,970 -280 7,730 2013 Dry 7,652 1 246 288 5,797 6 185 380 6,656 14,555 1,593 0 224 136 9,134 3,594 144 15 13,022 3 14,842 -287 7,444 2014 Dry 7,565 1 224 292 5,803 6 183 375 6,659 14,450 1,666 0 203 136 9,142 3,474 138 15 12,905 2 14,776 -326 7,117 7,770 11 419 280 5,721 6 179 510 6,695 14,895 1,451 183 255 175 9,047 3,472 153 14 12,861 3 14,753 142 7,640 1 243 279 5,868 6 186 444 6,783 14,667 1,759 72 199 164 9,170 3,504 144 11 12,993 2 15,026 -358 7,699 11 292 271 5,761 6 184 501 6,724 14,726 1,590 129 209 173 9,106 3,473 154 11 12,917 2 14,847 -121 7,636 23 277 271 5,681 6 180 529 6,666 14,602 1,465 126 214 179 9,058 3,424 154 10 12,824 2 14,632 -30 7,461 13 213 313 5,691 6 169 492 6,672 14,359 1,301 297 198 167 9,005 3,278 130 11 12,591 2 14,390 -30 7,782 5 376 282 5,708 6 176 518 6,690 14,853 1,376 241 273 181 9,032 3,508 145 13 12,878 3 14,771 82 8,192 6 923 276 5,700 6 178 520 6,680 15,801 1,339 210 387 175 8,970 3,592 175 26 12,938 3 14,877 924 Table 2C-21: Historical Water Budget for the San Timoteo Management Area Subsurface Inflows Subsurface Outflows
Total
Outflows
Annual Cumulative
Total
Inflows ET
Change in Storage
Stream
Leakage
Return
Flows
Precipitat
ion
Recharge
GW
Productio
n
GW
Discharge
to
Streams
GW
Discharge
to
Surface
Water
Year
Water
Year Type
Inflows to Principal Aquifer Outflows from Principal Aquifer Historical Average
tically Dry Wate Year A
Dry Water Year Avg
ow Normal Water Year
Normal Water Year Avg
ve Normal Water Year
Wet Water Year Avg
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 795 of 1274 DRAFT
Western
Heights North Bench Calimesa San Timoteo
11,812 0 3,600 442 7,770
2,829 293 1,714 812 11
6,101 335 3,429 1,918 419
From Beaumont Basin 1,315 -- -- 1,035 280
From San Timoteo Basin 6,544 -- 533 290 5,721
From SBBA 123 0 117 -- 6
From Crafton Hills 32 8 25 -- --
From Yucaipa Hills 3,524 -- 3,204 320 --
From San Bernardino Mountains 2,277 -- 2,277 -- --
From Western Heights MA -- -- 0 64 179
From North Bench MA -- 286 -- 2,586 --
From Calimesa MA -- 937 19 -- 510
From San Timoteo MA -- 153 -- 14 --
Total Subsurface Inflows 13,815 1,384 6,174 4,310 6,696 313 -- 313 -- --
34,870 2,012 15,231 7,481 14,896
3,460 5 1,690 314 1,451
To Beaumont Basin 795 -- -- 620 175
To San Timoteo Basin 9,109 -- 9 53 9,047
To SBBA 4,011 0 539 -- 3,472
To Crafton Hills 0 0 0 -- --
To Yucaipa Hills 2,272 -- 2,244 27 --
To San Bernardino Mountains 20 -- 20 -- --
To Western Heights MA -- -- 286 937 153
To North Bench MA -- 0 -- 19 --
To Calimesa MA -- 64 2,586 -- 14
To San Timoteo MA -- 179 -- 510 --
Total Subsurface Outflows 16,207 243 5,685 2,166 12,861 3,984 0 3,686 42 255
217 -- 217 -- --
11,346 2,443 3,444 5,276 183
23 0 16 4 3
35,237 2,691 14,737 7,802 14,753
-367 -679 494 -321 143
Surface Water Diversions represent extractions from YVWD Well 25 "--" represents categories that are not applicable to specific management area, or Subbasin, water budget Average Annual Change in Storage
Management Area
ET
Subsurface
Outflows
GW Discharges to Streams
GW Extractions
GW Discharge to Surface
Average Annual Outflows
Stream Leakage
Return Flows
Surface Water Spreading
Average Annual Inflows
Surface Water Diversions
Table 2C-22
Comparison of average annual water budget components for each Management Area in the Yucaipa Subbasin Water Budget Component
Historical Simulation Period: WY 1965-2014
Yucaipa
Subbasin
Precipitation Recharge
Subsurface
Inflows
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 796 of 1274 Appendix 2-D
Chapter B: YIHM, Yucaipa Subbasin, San Bernardino and
Riverside Counties, California

TO BE PROVIDED UPON COMPLETION
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 797 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 798 of 1274 Appendix 3-A
Drilling Logs and Well Completion Reports
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 799 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 800 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 801 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 802 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 803 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 804 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 805 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 806 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 807 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 808 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 809 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 810 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 811 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 812 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 813 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 814 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 815 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 816 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 817 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 818 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 819 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 820 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 821 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 822 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 823 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 824 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 825 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 826 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 827 of 1274 11507
August 2021
Appendix 3-A
Drilling Logs and Well Completion Reports
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 828 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 829 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 830 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 831 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 832 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 833 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 834 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 835 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 836 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 837 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 838 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 839 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 840 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 841 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 842 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 843 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 844 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 845 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 846 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 847 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 848 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 849 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 850 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 851 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 852 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 853 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 854 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 855 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 856 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 857 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 858 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 859 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 860 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 861 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 862 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 863 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 864 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 865 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 866 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 867 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 868 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 869 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 870 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 871 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 872 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 873 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 874 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 875 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 876 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 877 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 878 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 879 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 880 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 881 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 882 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 883 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 884 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 885 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 886 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 887 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 888 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 889 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 890 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 891 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 892 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 893 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 894 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 895 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 896 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 897 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 898 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 899 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 900 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 901 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 902 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 903 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 904 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 905 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 906 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 907 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 908 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 909 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 910 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 911 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 912 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 913 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 914 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 915 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 916 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 917 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 918 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 919 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 920 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 921 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 922 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 923 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 924 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 925 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 926 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 927 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 928 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 929 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 930 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 931 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 932 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 933 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 934 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 935 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 936 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 937 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 938 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 939 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 940 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 941 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 942 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 943 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 944 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 945 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 946 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 947 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 948 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 949 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 950 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 951 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 952 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 953 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 954 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 955 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 956 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 957 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 958 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 959 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 960 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 961 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 962 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 963 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 964 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 965 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 966 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 967 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 968 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 969 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 970 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 971 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 972 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 973 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 974 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 975 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 976 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 977 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 978 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 979 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 980 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 981 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 982 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 983 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 984 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 985 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 986 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 987 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 988 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 989 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 990 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 991 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 992 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 993 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 994 of 1274 Appendix 3-B
Monitoring Forms and Protocols
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 995 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 996 of 1274 Date (YYYY/MM/DD): Site ID:

Well Type: Production / Monitoring / Private Measuring Agency/Entity:

Well Pumping? Is Water Level Static?
Method of Water Level Measurement (see below): Site Status (see below):

Measuring Equipment ID: Measuring Point Elevation (ft NAVD88):

Measured by: Comments:*
NOTES:
*Comments should include quality concerns and changes that affect the representativeness of the measurements (e.g., changes in MP elevation, ownership, well operations, access to measure DTW, etc.) Measuring Point Correction
Water Level below Land Surface
Water Elevation (ft NAVD88)
Site Status: D = dry; O = obstructed; P = pumping; R = recently pumped and recovering; NP = nearby pumping; V = foreign substance; WD = well destroyed; SW = surface water effects; Z = other; S = Static Method of Water Level Measurement: A = airline; B = analog; C = calibrated airline; E = estimated; G = pressure gauge; H = calibrated pressure gage; M = manometer; R = reported; S = steel tape; T = electric tape; V = calibrated electric tape; Z = other.

WATER-LEVEL MEASUREMENT FIELD FORM

WATER LEVEL DATA
Time of Measurement
Measurement (feet)
Tape Correction (feet)
Water Level below MP (feet)
Yucaipa-SGMA Water Level Field Form

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 997 of 1274 Measuring Protocol:
1 2
3 4
5 6
Format instructions and notes:

Site ID: Well identified or State Well No.

MP: measuring point
ft NAVD88: feet above the National Vertical Datum of 1988.

Measuring Equipment ID: serial number or identifier of measuring equipment Disinfect and rinse that part of tape that was submerged below water. Dry tape and rewind.

Check circuitry of electrical tape before lowering the probe into the well by dipping probe into tap water.

Make all readings using the same indicator for consistency (light intensity or sound).

Lower electrode probe slowly into the well until the indicator shows that the circuit is closed and contact with the water surface is made. Place the nail of the index finger on the insulated wire at the MP (Measuring Point) and read the depth-to-water.

Record time of measurement. Record depth to water in the row “Measurement (feet)”. If the tape has been repaired and spliced or has a calibration correction, subtract the “Tape Correction” value from the “Measurement” value and record the difference in the row “Water Level below MP”.

Pull the tape up and make a check measurement by repeating steps 3-4. Record the check measurement in column 2. If check measurement does not agree with the original measurement within 0.02 foot, continue to make measurements until the reason of lack of agreement is determined or the results are shown to be reliable. If more than 2 measurements are made, use best judgment to select measurement most representative of field conditions.

Yucaipa-SGMA Water Level Field Form

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 998 of 1274

WELL PRODUCTION RECORD
Date Time Well ID Totalizer Reading
(Gallons)
Instantaneous
Pumping Rate (GPM)
Estimated Pumping
Rate (GPM)
Model and Make of
Totalizer
Yucaipa-SGMA Well Production Record Page 1 of 1 2021-08-21 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 999 of 1274

WATER QUALITY FIELD FORM
Date (YYYY/MM/DD): Site ID:

Well Type: Production / Monitoring / Private Measuring Agency/Entity:

Well Pumping? If so, how long? Is Initial Water Level Static? Method of Well Purging (see below): Site Status (see below):

Purging Equipment ID: Water Quality Meter ID:

Purge Volume Calculation:
[A] Total depth of well casing (ft bls): [C] Well Casing Inside Diameter (inches):
[B] Static depth to water, if not pumping (ft bls): [D] Length of Water Column, [A] - [B] (ft):

Purge Volume (3 Casing Volumes), ([D] * p/4 * ([C]/12)2 ) * 3 =
Time Purge Rate Temperature (o
C) pH Conductivity
( )
Oxidation-Reduction
Potential (mV)
Dissolved Oxygen
(mg/L)
Turbidity
(NTUs)
Measured by: Comments:*

WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
Yucaipa-SGMA Water Quality Field Form

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1000 of 1274

WATER QUALITY FIELD FORM
NOTES:

Purging and Sampling Protocol:
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Format instructions and notes:

Site ID: Well identifier or State Well No.
ft bls: feet below land surface
Purging Equipment ID/description: serial number or identifier of measuring equipment The Chain-of-Custory form should be filled out as the sample is collected and preserved.

If the well has a dedicated pump and it is operating, ensure that it has been operating consistently and at least three (3) casing volumes have been pumped. If not, note pumping rate and time to purge 3 casing volumes before collecting representative samples.

Measure and record water quality parameters through purging process.

If the well does not have a dedicate pump, then use purging equipment (e.g., portable submersible pump, bailer) to purge well. If using a portable submersible pump, lower pump to depth (consistent with previous smapling events) that ensures pump will not draw water level down to intake and, if possible, is positioned above the top of the well screen.

Ensure that portable purging equipment is properly decontaminated prior to use. Any decontamination must be documented (e.g., material used to decontaminate equipment, rinsing method, containment of waste, waste disposal).

Measure and/or record purge rate periodically. Collect purge sample to measure parameters periodically. Parameters should stablize (within 10% of previous three readings) before collecting the water quality sample.

Use the appropriate sample containers provided by the analytical laboratory. Sample containers shoud be labeled prior to sample collection. The sample label should include: Sample ID (often well ID), sample date and time of collection, sampling personnel, preservative used (if any), and the analytical method to be used on the sample.

All samples should be preserved as soon as possible in an ice chest containing ice. The samples should be chilled and maintained at 4 o
C.
*Comments should include quality concerns and changes that affect the representativeness of the measurements (e.g., changes in pump placement, ownership, well operations, access to sampling port, etc.) Site Status: D = dry; O = obstructed; P = pumping; R = recently pumped and recovering; NP = nearby pumping; V = foreign substance; WD = well destroyed; SW = surface water effects; Z = other; S = Static Method of Well Purging: B = bailer; D = dedicated submersible pump; P = portable submersible pump; T = dedicated turbine pump; S = peristaltic pump.

Yucaipa-SGMA Water Quality Field Form

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1001 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1002 of 1274 State of California
Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor
California Natural Resources Agency
John Laird, Secretary for Natural Resources
Department of Water Resources
Mark W. Cowin, Director
Carl A. Torgersen, Chief Deputy Director
Office of the Chief Counsel Public Affairs Office Government and Community Liaison Spencer Kenner Ed Wilson Anecita S. Agustinez
Office of Workforce Equality Policy Advisor Legislative Affairs Office Stephanie Varrelman Waiman Yip Kasey Schimke, Ass’t Dir.

Deputy Directors
Gary Bardini Integrated Water Management
William Croyle Statewide Emergency Preparedness and Security Mark Anderson State Water Project
John Pacheco (Acting) California Energy Resources Scheduling Kathie Kishaba Business Operations
Taryn Ravazzini Special Initiatives
Division of Integrated Regional Water Management
Arthur Hinojosa Jr., Chief
Prepared under the direction of:

David Gutierrez, Sustainable Groundwater Management Program Manager Rich Juricich, Sustainable Groundwater Management Branch Prepared by:

Trevor Joseph, BMP Project Manager
Timothy Godwin
Dan McManus
Mark Nordberg
Heather Shannon
Steven Springhorn
With assistance from:

DWR Region Office Staff
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1003 of 1274 Groundwater Monitoring Protocols, Standards, and Sites
Best Management Practice

1. OBJECTIVE
The objective of this Best Management Practice (BMP) is to assist in the development of Monitoring Protocols. The California Department of Water Resources (the Department or DWR) has developed this document as part of the obligation in the Technical Assistance chapter (Chapter 7) of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) to support the long-term sustainability of California’s groundwater basins.

Information provided in this BMP provides technical assistance to Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) and other stakeholders to aid in the establishment of consistent data collection processes and procedures. In addition, this BMP can be used by GSAs to adopt a set of sampling and measuring procedures that will yield similar data regardless of the monitoring personnel. Finally, this BMP identifies available resources to support the development of monitoring protocols.

This BMP includes the following sections:

1. Objective. A brief description of how and where monitoring protocols are required under SGMA and the overall objective of this BMP.

2. Use and Limitations. A brief description of the use and limitations of this BMP.

3. Monitoring Protocol Fundamentals. A description of the general approach and background of groundwater monitoring protocols.

4. Relationship of Monitoring Protocols to other BMPs. A description of how this BMP is connected with other BMPS.

5. Technical Assistance. Technical content providing guidance for regulatory sections.

6. Key Definitions. Descriptions of definitions identified in the GSP Regulations or SGMA.

7. Related Materials. References and other materials that provide supporting information related to the development of Groundwater Monitoring Protocols.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1004 of 1274

2. USE AND LIMITATIONS
BMPs developed by the Department provide technical guidance to GSAs and other stakeholders. Practices described in these BMPs do not replace the GSP Regulations, nor do they create new requirements or obligations for GSAs or other stakeholders. In addition, using this BMP to develop a GSP does not equate to an approval determination by the Department. All references to GSP Regulations relate to Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division 2, Chapter 1.5, and Subchapter 2. All references to SGMA relate to California Water Code sections in Division 6, Part 2.74.

3. MONITORING PROTOCOL FUNDAMENTALS
Establishing data collection protocols that are based on best available scientific methods is essential. Protocols that can be applied consistently across all basins will likely yield comparable data. Consistency of data collection methods reduces uncertainty in the comparison of data and facilitates more accurate communication within basins as well as between basins.

Basic minimum technical standards of accuracy lead to quality data that will better support implementation of GSPs.

4. RELATIONSHIP OF MONITORING PROTOCOL TO OTHER BMPS
Groundwater monitoring is a fundamental component of SGMA, as each GSP must include a sufficient network of data that demonstrates measured progress toward the achievement of the sustainability goal for each basin. For this reason, a standard set of protocols need to be developed and utilized.

It is important that data is developed in a manner consistent with the basin setting, planning, and projects/management actions steps identified on Figure 1 and the GSP Regulations. The inclusion of monitoring protocols in the GSP Regulations also emphasizes the importance of quality empirical data to support GSPs and provide comparable information from basin to basin.

Figure 1 provides a logical progression for the development of a GSP and illustrates how monitoring protocols are linked to other related BMPs. This figure also shows the context of the BMPs as they relate to various steps to sustainability as outlined in the GSP Regulations. The monitoring protocol BMP is part of the Monitoring step identified in Figure 1.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1005 of 1274 Figure 1 – Logical Progression of Basin Activities Needed to Increase Basin Sustainability
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1006 of 1274

5. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
The GSP Regulations specifically call out the need to utilize protocols identified in this BMP, or develop similar protocols. The following technical protocols provide guidance based upon existing professional standards and are commonly adopted in various groundwater-related programs. They provide clear techniques that yield quality data for use in the various components of the GSP. They can be further elaborated on by individual GSAs in the form of standard operating procedures which reflect specific local requirements and conditions. While many methodologies are suggested in this BMP, it should be understood that qualified professional judgment should be used to meet the specific monitoring needs.

The following BMPs may be incorporated into a GSP’s monitoring protocols section for collecting groundwater elevation data. A GSP that adopts protocols that deviate from these BMPs must demonstrate that they will yield comparable data.

PROTOCOLS FOR ESTABLISHING A MONITORING PROGRAM
The protocol for establishment of a monitoring program should be evaluated in conjunction with the Monitoring Network and Identification of Data Gaps BMP and other BMPs. Monitoring protocols must take into consideration the Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model, Water Budget, and Modeling BMPs when considering the data needs to meet GSP objectives and the sustainability goal.

It is suggested that each GSP incorporate the Data Quality Objective (DQO) process following the U.S. EPA Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives Process (EPA, 2006). Although strict adherence to this method is not required, it does provide a robust approach to consider and assures that data is collected with a specific purpose in mind, and efforts for monitoring are as efficient as possible to achieve the objectives of the GSP and compliance with the GSP Regulations. 23 CCR §352.2. Monitoring Protocols. Each Plan shall include monitoring protocols adopted by the Agency for data collection and management, as follows:
(a) Monitoring protocols shall be developed according to best management practices. (b) The Agency may rely on monitoring protocols included as part of the best management practices developed by the Department, or may adopt similar monitoring protocols that will yield comparable data.
(c) Monitoring protocols shall be reviewed at least every five years as part of the periodic evaluation of the Plan, and modified as necessary.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1007 of 1274 The DQO process presents a method that can be applied directly to the sustainability criteria quantitative requirements through the following steps.

1. State the problem – Define sustainability indicators and planning considerations of the GSP and sustainability goal.

2. Identify the goal – Describe the quantitative measurable objectives and minimum thresholds for each of the sustainability indicators.

3. Identify the inputs – Describe the data necessary to evaluate the sustainability indicators and other GSP requirements (i.e. water budget).

4. Define the boundaries of the study – This is commonly the extent of the Bulletin 118 groundwater basin or subbasin, unless multiple GSPs are prepared for a given basin. In that case, evaluation of the coordination plan and specifically how the monitoring will be comparable and meet the sustainability goals for the entire basin.

5. Develop an analytical approach – Determine how the quantitative sustainability indicators will be evaluated (i.e. are special analytical methods required that have specific data needs).

6. Specify performance or acceptance criteria – Determine what quality the data must have to achieve the objective and provide some assurance that the analysis is accurate and reliable.

7. Develop a plan for obtaining data – Once the objectives are known determine how these data should be collected. Existing data sources should be used to the greatest extent possible.

These steps of the DQO process should be used to guide GSAs to develop the most efficient monitoring process to meet the measurable objectives of the GSP and the sustainability goal. The DQO process is an iterative process and should be evaluated regularly to improve monitoring efficiencies and meet changing planning and project needs. Following the DQO process, GSAs should also include a data quality control and quality assurance plan to guide the collection of data.

Many monitoring programs already exist as part of ongoing groundwater management or other programs. To the extent possible, the use of existing monitoring data and programs should be utilized to meet the needs for characterization, historical record documentation, and continued monitoring for the SGMA program. However, an evaluation of the existing monitoring data should be performed to assure the data being collected meets the DQOs, regulatory requirements, and data collection protocol described in this BMP. While this BMP provides guidance for collection of various Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1008 of 1274 regulatory based requirements, there is flexibility among the various methodologies available to meet the DQOs based upon professional judgment (local conditions or project needs).

At a minimum, for each monitoring site, the following information or procedure should be collected and documented:
• Long-term access agreements. Access agreements should include year-round site access to allow for increased monitoring frequency.
• A unique identifier that includes a general written description of the site location, date established, access instructions and point of contact (if necessary), type of information to be collected, latitude, longitude, and elevation. Each monitoring location should also track all modifications to the site in a modification log.

PROTOCOLS FOR MEASURING GROUNDWATER LEVELS
This section presents considerations for the methodology of collection of groundwater level data such that it meets the requirements of the GSP Regulations and the DQOs of the specific GSP. Groundwater levels are a fundamental measure of the status of groundwater conditions within a basin. In many cases, relationships of the sustainability indicators may be able to be correlated with groundwater levels. The quality of this data must consider the specific aquifer being monitored and the methodology for collecting these levels.

The following considerations for groundwater level measuring protocols should ensure the following:
• Groundwater level data are taken from the correct location, well ID, and screen interval depth
• Groundwater level data are accurate and reproducible
• Groundwater level data represent conditions that inform appropriate basin management DQOs
• All salient information is recorded to correct, if necessary, and compare data • Data are handled in a way that ensures data integrity Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1009 of 1274 General Well Monitoring Information
The following presents considerations for collection of water level data that include regulatory required components as well as those which are recommended. • Groundwater elevation data will form the basis of basin-wide water-table and piezometric maps, and should approximate conditions at a discrete period in time. Therefore, all groundwater levels in a basin should be collected within as short a time as possible, preferably within a 1 to 2 week period. • Depth to groundwater must be measured relative to an established Reference Point (RP) on the well casing. The RP is usually identified with a permanent marker, paint spot, or a notch in the lip of the well casing. By convention in open casing monitoring wells, the RP reference point is located on the north side of the well casing. If no mark is apparent, the person performing the measurement should measure the depth to groundwater from the north side of the top of the well casing.
• The elevation of the RP of each well must be surveyed to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88), or a local datum that can be converted to NAVD88. The elevation of the RP must be accurate to within 0.5 foot. It is preferable for the RP elevation to be accurate to 0.1 foot or less. Survey grade global navigation satellite system (GNSS) global positioning system (GPS) equipment can achieve similar vertical accuracy when corrected. Guidance for use of GPS can be found at USGS http://water.usgs.gov/osw/gps/. Hand-held GPS units likely will not produce reliable vertical elevation measurement accurate enough for the casing elevation consistent with the DQOs and regulatory requirements.
• The sampler should remove the appropriate cap, lid, or plug that covers the monitoring access point listening for pressure release. If a release is observed, the measurement should follow a period of time to allow the water level to equilibrate.
• Depth to groundwater must be measured to an accuracy of 0.1 foot below the RP.

It is preferable to measure depth to groundwater to an accuracy of 0.01 foot. Air lines and acoustic sounders may not provide the required accuracy of 0.1 foot. • The water level meter should be decontaminated after measuring each well.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1010 of 1274 Where existing wells do not meet the base standard as described in the GSP Regulations or the considerations provided above, new monitoring wells may need to be constructed to meet the DQOs of the GSP. The design, installation, and documentation of new monitoring wells must consider the following:
• Construction consistent with California Well Standards as described in Bulletins 74-81 and 74-90, and local permitting agency standards of practice. • Logging of borehole cuttings under the supervision of a California Professional Geologist and described consistent with the Unified Soil Classification System methods according to ASTM standard D2487-11.
• Written criteria for logging of borehole cuttings for comparison to known geologic formations, principal aquifers and aquitards/aquicludes, or specific marker beds to aid in consistent stratigraphic correlation within and across basins.
• Geophysical surveys of boreholes to aid in consistency of logging practices.

Methodologies should include resistivity, spontaneous potential, spectral gamma, or other methods as appropriate for the conditions. Selection of geophysical methods should be based upon the opinion of a professional geologist or professional engineer, and address the DQOs for the specific borehole and characterization needs.
• Prepare and submit State well completion reports according to the requirements of §13752. Well completion report documentation should include geophysical logs, detailed geologic log, and formation identification as attachments. An example well completion as-built log is illustrated in Figure 2. DWR well completion reports can be filed directly at the Online System for Well Completion Reports (OSWCR) http://water.ca.gov/oswcr/index.cfm.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1011 of 1274 Figure 2 – Example As-Built Multi-Completion Monitoring Well Log Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1012 of 1274 Measuring Groundwater Levels
Well construction, anticipated groundwater level, groundwater level measuring equipment, field conditions, and well operations should be considered prior collection of the groundwater level measurement. The USGS Groundwater Technical Procedures (Cunningham and Schalk, 2011) provide a thorough set of procedures which can be used to establish specific Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for a local agency.

Figure 3 illustrates a typical groundwater level measuring event and simultaneous pressure transducer download.

Figure 3 – Collection of Water Level Measurement and Pressure Transducer Download
The following points provide a general approach for collecting groundwater level measurements:
• Measure depth to water in the well using procedures appropriate for the measuring device. Equipment must be operated and maintained in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Groundwater levels should be measured to the nearest 0.01 foot relative to the RP.
• For measuring wells that are under pressure, allow a period of time for the groundwater levels to stabilize. In these cases, multiple measurements should be collected to ensure the well has reached equilibrium such that no significant changes in water level are observed. Every effort should be made to ensure that a representative stable depth to groundwater is recorded. If a well does not stabilize, the quality of the value should be appropriately qualified as a Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1013 of 1274 questionable measurement. In the event that a well is artesian, site specific procedures should be developed to collect accurate information and be protective of safety conditions associated with a pressurized well. In many cases, an extension pipe may be adequate to stabilize head in the well. Record the dimension of the extension and document measurements and configuration. • The sampler should calculate the groundwater elevation as:

𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺 = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 − 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷
Where:

GWE = Groundwater Elevation
RPE = Reference Point Elevation
DTW = Depth to Water
The sampler must ensure that all measurements are in consistent units of feet, tenths of feet, and hundredths of feet. Measurements and RPEs should not be recorded in feet and inches.

Recording Groundwater Levels
• The sampler should record the well identifier, date, time (24-hour format), RPE, height of RP above or below ground surface, DTW, GWE, and comments regarding any factors that may influence the depth to water readings such as weather, nearby irrigation, flooding, potential for tidal influence, or well condition. If there is a questionable measurement or the measurement cannot be obtained, it should be noted. An example of a field sheet with the required information is shown in Figure 4. It includes questionable measurement and no measurement codes that should be noted. This field sheet is provided as an example. Standardized field forms should be used for all data collection. The aforementioned USGS Groundwater Technical Procedures offers a number of example forms.
• The sampler should replace any well caps or plugs, and lock any well buildings or covers.
• All data should be entered into the GSA data management system (DMS) as soon as possible. Care should be taken to avoid data entry mistakes and the entries should be checked by a second person for compliance with the DQOs.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1014 of 1274 Figure 4 – Example of Water Level Well Data Field Collection Form Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1015 of 1274 Pressure Transducers
Groundwater levels and/or calculated groundwater elevations may be recorded using pressure transducers equipped with data loggers installed in monitoring wells. When installing pressure transducers, care must be exercised to ensure that the data recorded by the transducers is confirmed with hand measurements.

The following general protocols must be followed when installing a pressure transducer in a monitoring well:
• The sampler must use an electronic sounder or chalked steel tape and follow the protocols listed above to measure the groundwater level and calculate the groundwater elevation in the monitoring well to properly program and reference the installation. It is recommended that transducers record measured groundwater level to conserve data capacity; groundwater elevations can be calculated at a later time after downloading.
• The sampler must note the well identifier, the associated transducer serial number, transducer range, transducer accuracy, and cable serial number. • Transducers must be able to record groundwater levels with an accuracy of at least 0.1 foot. Professional judgment should be exercised to ensure that the data being collected is meeting the DQO and that the instrument is capable.

Consideration of the battery life, data storage capacity, range of groundwater level fluctuations, and natural pressure drift of the transducers should be included in the evaluation.
• The sampler must note whether the pressure transducer uses a vented or nonvented cable for barometric compensation. Vented cables are preferred, but nonvented units provide accurate data if properly corrected for natural barometric pressure changes. This requires the consistent logging of barometric pressures to coincide with measurement intervals.
• Follow manufacturer specifications for installation, calibration, data logging intervals, battery life, correction procedure (if non-vented cables used), and anticipated life expectancy to assure that DQOs are being met for the GSP. • Secure the cable to the well head with a well dock or another reliable method.

Mark the cable at the elevation of the reference point with tape or an indelible marker. This will allow estimates of future cable slippage. • The transducer data should periodically be checked against hand measured groundwater levels to monitor electronic drift or cable movement. This should happen during routine site visits, at least annually or as necessary to maintain data integrity.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1016 of 1274 • The data should be downloaded as necessary to ensure no data is lost and entered into the basin’s DMS following the QA/QC program established for the GSP. Data collected with non-vented data logger cables should be corrected for atmospheric barometric pressure changes, as appropriate. After the sampler is confident that the transducer data have been safely downloaded and stored, the data should be deleted from the data logger to ensure that adequate data logger memory remains.

PROTOCOLS FOR SAMPLING GROUNDWATER QUALITY
The following protocols can be incorporated into a GSP’s monitoring protocols for collecting groundwater quality data. More detailed sampling procedures and protocols are included in the standards and guidance documents listed at the end of this BMP. A GSP that adopts protocols that deviate from these BMPs must demonstrate that the adopted protocols will yield comparable data.

In general, the use of existing water quality data within the basin should be done to the greatest extent possible if it achieves the DQOs for the GSP. In some cases it may be necessary to collect additional water quality data to support monitoring programs or evaluate specific projects. The USGS National Field Manual for the Collection of Water Quality Data (Wilde, 2005) should be used to guide the collection of reliable data. Figure 5 illustrates a typical groundwater quality sampling setup.

Figure 5 – Typical Groundwater Quality Sampling Event
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1017 of 1274 All analyses should be performed by a laboratory certified under the State Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program. The specific analytical methods are beyond the scope of this BMP, but should be commiserate with other programs evaluating water quality within the basin for comparative purposes.

Groundwater quality sampling protocols should ensure that:
• Groundwater quality data are taken from the correct location • Groundwater quality data are accurate and reproducible • Groundwater quality data represent conditions that inform appropriate basin management and are consistent with the DQOs
• All salient information is recorded to normalize, if necessary, and compare data • Data are handled in a way that ensures data integrity The following points are general guidance in addition to the techniques presented in the previously mentioned USGS National Field Manual for the Collection of Water Quality Data.

Standardized protocols include the following:
• Prior to sampling, the sampler must contact the laboratory to schedule laboratory time, obtain appropriate sample containers, and clarify any sample holding times or sample preservation requirements.
• Each well used for groundwater quality monitoring must have a unique identifier. This identifier must appear on the well housing or the well casing to avoid confusion.
• In the case of wells with dedicated pumps, samples should be collected at or near the wellhead. Samples should not be collected from storage tanks, at the end of long pipe runs, or after any water treatment.
• The sampler should clean the sampling port and/or sampling equipment and the sampling port and/or sampling equipment must be free of any contaminants. The sampler must decontaminate sampling equipment between sampling locations or wells to avoid cross-contamination between samples.
• The groundwater elevation in the well should be measured following appropriate protocols described above in the groundwater level measuring protocols. • For any well not equipped with low-flow or passive sampling equipment, an adequate volume of water should be purged from the well to ensure that the groundwater sample is representative of ambient groundwater and not stagnant water in the well casing. Purging three well casing volumes is generally Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1018 of 1274 considered adequate. Professional judgment should be used to determine the proper configuration of the sampling equipment with respect to well construction such that a representative ambient groundwater sample is collected. If pumping causes a well to be evacuated (go dry), document the condition and allow well to recover to within 90% of original level prior to sampling. Professional judgment should be exercised as to whether the sample will meet the DQOs and adjusted as necessary.
• Field parameters of pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature should be collected for each sample. Field parameters should be evaluated during the purging of the well and should stabilize prior to sampling. Measurements of pH should only be measured in the field, lab pH analysis are typically unachievable due to short hold times. Other parameters, such as oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen (DO) (in situ measurements preferable), or turbidity, may also be useful for meeting DQOs of GSP and assessing purge conditions. All field instruments should be calibrated daily and evaluated for drift throughout the day.
• Sample containers should be labeled prior to sample collection. The sample label must include: sample ID (often well ID), sample date and time, sample personnel, sample location, preservative used, and analytes and analytical method. • Samples should be collected under laminar flow conditions. This may require reducing pumping rates prior to sample collection.
• Samples should be collected according to appropriate standards such as those listed in the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, USGS National Field Manual for the Collection of Water Quality Data, or other appropriate guidance. The specific sample collection procedure should reflect the type of analysis to be performed and DQOs.
• All samples requiring preservation must be preserved as soon as practically possible, ideally at the time of sample collection. Ensure that samples are appropriately filtered as recommended for the specific analyte. Entrained solids can be dissolved by preservative leading to inconsistent results of dissolve analytes. Specifically, samples to be analyzed for metals should be field-filtered prior to preservation; do not collect an unfiltered sample in a preserved container.
• Samples should be chilled and maintained at 4 °C to prevent degradation of the sample. The laboratory’s Quality Assurance Management Plan should detail appropriate chilling and shipping requirements.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1019 of 1274 • Samples must be shipped under chain of custody documentation to the appropriate laboratory promptly to avoid violating holding time restrictions. • Instruct the laboratory to use reporting limits that are equal to or less than the applicable DQOs or regional water quality objectives/screening levels.

Special protocols for low-flow sampling equipment
In addition to the protocols listed above, sampling using low-flow sample equipment should adopt the following protocols derived from EPA’s Low-flow (minimal drawdown) ground-water sampling procedures (Puls and Barcelona, 1996). These protocols apply to low-flow sampling equipment that generally pumps between 0.1 and 0.5 liters per minute. These protocols are not intended for bailers.

Special protocols for passive sampling equipment
In addition to the protocols listed above, passive diffusion samplers should follow protocols set forth in USGS Fact Sheet 088-00.

PROTOCOLS FOR MONITORING SEAWATER INTRUSION
Monitoring seawater intrusion requires analysis of the chloride concentrations within groundwater of each principal aquifer subject to seawater intrusion. While no significant standardized approach exists, the methodologies described above for degraded water quality can be applied for the collection of groundwater samples. In addition to the protocol described above, the following protocols should be followed:
• Water quality samples should be collected and analyzed at least semi-annually.

Samples will be analyzed for dissolved chloride at a minimum. It may be beneficial to include analyses of iodide and bromide to aid in determination of salinity source. More frequent sampling may be necessary to meet DQOs of GSP.

The development of surrogate measures of chloride concentration may facilitate cost-effective means to monitor more frequently to observe the range of conditions and variability of the flow dynamics controlling seawater intrusion. • Groundwater levels will be collected at a frequency adequate to characterize changes in head in the vicinity of the leading edge of degraded water quality in each principal aquifer. Frequency may need to be increased in areas of known preferential pathways, groundwater pumping, or efficacy evaluation of mitigation projects.
• The use of geophysical surveys, electrical resistivity, or other methods may provide for identification of preferential pathways and optimize monitoring well placement and evaluation of the seawater intrusion front. Professional judgment Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1020 of 1274 should be exercised to determine the appropriate methodology and whether the DQOs for the GSP would be met.

PROTOCOLS FOR MEASURING STREAMFLOW
Monitoring of streamflow is necessary for incorporation into water budget analysis and for use in evaluation of stream depletions associated with groundwater extractions. The use of existing monitoring locations should be incorporated to the greatest extent possible. Many of these streamflow monitoring locations currently follow the protocol described below.

Establishment of new streamflow discharge sites should consider the existing network and the objectives of the new location. Professional judgment should be used to determine the appropriate permitting that may be necessary for the installation of any monitoring locations along surface water bodies. Regular frequent access will be necessary to these sites for the development of ratings curves and maintenance of equipment.

To establish a new streamflow monitoring station special consideration must be made in the field to select an appropriate location for measuring discharge. Once a site is selected, development of a relationship of stream stage to discharge will be necessary to provide continuous estimates of streamflow. Several measurements of discharge at a variety of stream stages will be necessary to develop the ratings curve correlating stage to discharge. The use of Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) can provide accurate estimates of discharge in the correct settings. Professional judgment must be exercised to determine the appropriate methodology. Following development of the ratings curve a simple stilling well and pressure transducer with data logger can be used to evaluate stage on a frequent basis. A simple stilling well and staff gage is illustrated in Figure 6.

Streamflow measurements should be collected, analyzed, and reported in accordance with the procedures outlined in USGS Water Supply Paper 2175, Volume 1. – Measurement of Stage Discharge and Volume 2. – Computation of Discharge. This methodology is currently being used by both the USGS and DWR for existing streamflow monitoring throughout the State.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1021 of 1274 Figure 6 – Simple Stilling Well and Staff Gage Setup

PROTOCOLS FOR MEASURING SUBSIDENCE
Evaluating and monitoring inelastic land subsidence can utilize multiple data sources to evaluate the specific conditions and associated causes. To the extent possible, the use of existing data should be utilized. Subsidence can be estimated from numerous techniques, they include: level surveying tied to known stable benchmarks or benchmarks located outside the area being studied for possible subsidence; installing and tracking changes in borehole extensometers; obtaining data from continuous GPS (CGPS) locations, static GPS surveys or Real-Time-Kinematic (RTK) surveys; or analyzing Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data. No standard procedures exist for collecting data from the potential subsidence monitoring approaches. However, an approach may include:
• Identification of land subsidence conditions.
o Evaluate existing regional long-term leveling surveys of regional infrastructure, i.e. roadways, railroads, canals, and levees. o Inspect existing county and State well records where collapse has been noted for well repairs or replacement.
o Determine if significant fine-grained layers are present such that the potential for collapse of the units could occur should there be significant depressurization of the aquifer system.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1022 of 1274 o Inspect geologic logs and the hydrogeologic conceptual model to aid in identification of specific units of concern.
o Collect regional remote-sensing information such as InSAR, commonly provided by USGS and NASA. Data availability is currently limited, but future resources are being developed.
• Monitor regions of suspected subsidence where potential exists. o Establish CGPS network to evaluate changes in land surface elevation. o Establish leveling surveys transects to observe changes in land surface elevation.
o Establish extensometer network to observe land subsidence. An example of a typical extensometer design is illustrated in Figure 7. There are a variety of extensometer designs and they should be selected based on the specific DQOs.

Various standards and guidance documents for collecting data include:
• Leveling surveys must follow surveying standards set out in the California Department of Transportation’s Caltrans Surveys Manual. • GPS surveys must follow surveying standards set out in the California Department of Transportation’s Caltrans Surveys Manual. • USGS has been performing subsidence surveys within several areas of California.

These studies are sound examples for appropriate methods and should be utilized to the extent possible and where available:
o http://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidencemeasuring.html • Instruments installed in borehole extensometers must follow the manufacturer’s instructions for installation, care, and calibration.
• Availability of InSAR data is improving and will increase as programs are developed. This method requires expertise in analysis of the raw data and will likely be made available as an interpretative report for specific regions.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1023 of 1274 Figure 7 – Simplified Extensometer Diagram
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1024 of 1274

6. KEY DEFINITIONS
The key definitions and sections related to Groundwater Monitoring Protocols, Standards, and Sites outlined in applicable SGMA code and regulations are provided below for reference.

Groundwater Sustainability Plan Regulations (California Code of Regulations §351) • §351(h) “Best available science” refers to the use of sufficient and credible information and data, specific to the decision being made and the time frame available for making that decision, that is consistent with scientific and engineering professional standards of practice.
• §351(i) “Best management practice” refers to a practice, or combination of practices, that are designed to achieve sustainable groundwater management and have been determined to be technologically and economically effective, practicable, and based on best available science.

Monitoring Protocols Reference
§352.2. Monitoring Protocols
Each Plan shall include monitoring protocols adopted by the Agency for data collection and management, as follows:
(a) Monitoring protocols shall be developed according to best management practices.
(b) The Agency may rely on monitoring protocols included as part of the best management practices developed by the Department, or may adopt similar monitoring protocols that will yield comparable data.
(c) Monitoring protocols shall be reviewed at least every five years as part of the periodic evaluation of the Plan, and modified as necessary.

SGMA Reference
§10727.2. Required Plan Elements
(f) Monitoring protocols that are designed to detect changes in groundwater levels, groundwater quality, inelastic surface subsidence for basins for which subsidence has been identified as a potential problem, and flow and quality of surface water that directly affect groundwater levels or quality or are caused by groundwater extraction in the basin. The monitoring protocols shall be designed to generate information that promotes efficient and effective groundwater management.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1025 of 1274

7. RELATED MATERIALS

CASE STUDIES
Luhdorff & Scalmanini Consulting Engineers, J.W. Borchers, M. Carpenter. 2014. Land Subsidence from Groundwater Use in California. Full Report of Findings prepared for California Water Foundation. April 2014. 151 p.
http://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidence-cause-effect.html Faunt, C.C., M. Sneed, J. Traum, and J.T. Brandt, 2015. Water availability and land subsidence in the Central Valley, California, USA. Hydrogeol J (2016) 24: 675. doi:10.1007/s10040-015-1339-x.
https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/701605
Poland, J.F., B.E. Lofgren, R.L. Ireland, and R.G. Pugh, 1975. Land subsidence in the San Joaquin Valley, California, as of 1972; US Geological Survey Professional Paper 437-H; prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources, 87 p. http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0437h/report.pdf
Sneed, M., J.T. Brandt, and M. Solt, 2013. Land subsidence along the Delta-Mendota Canal in the northern part of the San Joaquin Valley, California, 2003-10; USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2013-5142, prepared in cooperation with U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20135142
Sneed, M., J.T. Brandt, and M. Solt, 2014. Land subsidence, groundwater levels, and geology in the Coachella Valley, California, 1993–2010: U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5075, 62 p.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20145075.

STANDARDS
California Department of Transportation, various dates. Caltrans Surveys Manual. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/row/landsurveys/SurveysManual/Manual_TOC.html U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006. Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives Process, EPA QA/G-4
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/guidance_systematic_planning_ dqo_process.pdf
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1026 of 1274 Rice, E.W., R.B. Baire, A.D. Eaton, and L.S. Clesceri ed. 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation.

GUIDANCE
Barcelona, M.J., J.P. Gibb, J.A. Helfrich, and E.E.Graske. 1985. Practical Guide for GroundWater Sampling. Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Illinois, 103 pages. www.orau.org/ptp/PTP%20Library/library/epa/samplings/pracgw.pdf Buchanan, T.J., and W.P. Somers, 1969. Discharge measurements at gaging stations; techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geologic Survey chapter A8, Washington D.C. http://pubs.usgs.gov/twri/twri3a8/html/pdf.html Cunningham, W.L., and Schalk, C.W., comps., 2011, Groundwater technical procedures of the U.S. Geological Survey: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 1–A1. https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/1a1/pdf/tm1-a1.pdf
California Department of Water Resources, 2010. Groundwater elevation monitoring guidelines.
http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/casgem/pdfs/CASGEM%20DWR%20GW%20Gu idelines%20Final%20121510.pdf
Holmes, R.R. Jr., P.J. Terrio, M.A. Harris, and P.C. Mills, 2001. Introduction to field methods for hydrologic and environmental studies, open-file report 01-50, USGS, Urbana, Illinois, 241 p. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr0150 Puls, R.W., and Barcelona, M.J., 1996, Low-Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground-Water Sampling Procedures; US EPA, Ground Water Issue EPA/540/S-95/504. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/lwflw2a.pdf Rantz, S.E., and others, 1982. Measurement and computation of streamflow; U.S. Geological Survey, Water Supply Paper 2175. http://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/wsp2175/#table Subcommittee on Ground Water of the Advisory Committee on Water Information, 2013. A national framework for ground-water monitoring in the United States. http://acwi.gov/sogw/ngwmn_framework_report_july2013.pdf Vail, J., D. France, and B. Lewis. 2013. Operating Procedure: Groundwater Sampling SESDPROC-301-R3.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1027 of 1274 https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/GroundwaterSampling.pdf Wilde, F.D., January 2005. Preparations for water sampling (ver. 2.0): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chap. A1, http://water.usgs.gov/owq/FieldManual/compiled/NFM_complete.pdf

ONLINE RESOURCES
Online System for Well Completion Reports (OSWCR). California Department of Water Resources. http://water.ca.gov/oswcr/index.cfm
Measuring Land Subsidence web page. U.S. Geological Survey. http://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidence-measuring.html USGS Global Positioning Application and Practice web page. U.S. Geological Survey. http://water.usgs.gov/osw/gps/
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1028 of 1274 California Statewide Groundwater
Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) Program
Procedures for
Monitoring Entity Reporting
December 2010
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1029 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
2 Department of Water Resources (DWR) will use the internet as the primary communication tool to notify interested parties and groundwater Monitoring Entities of the status of the CASGEM program on an ongoing basis. Information will be posted at the following website: http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/casgem In addition to the above-referenced website, DWR will distribute information via email. In order to be placed on the CASGEM contact list, please register your contact information at the following website: http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/casgem/register/ For questions about the Reporting Procedures, or other technical issues, please contact:

DWR Headquarters
Mary Scruggs
901 P Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 654-1324
[email protected]
Northern Region Office
Kelly Staton
2440 Main Street
Red Bluff, CA 96080
530-529-7344
[email protected]
North Central Region
Office
Chris Bonds
3500 Industrial Avenue
West Sacramento, CA
95691
(916) 376-9657
[email protected]
South Central Region
Office
Dane Mathis
3374 Shields Avenue
Fresno, CA 93726
(559) 230-3354
[email protected]
Southern Region Office
Tim Ross
770 Fairmont Avenue
Suite 102
Glendale, CA 91203
(818) 500-1645 x278
[email protected]
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1030 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction to CASGEM Program ........................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of Monitoring Entity Reporting Procedures ................................................................................ 6 CASGEM Schedule ................................................................................................................................... 7 Monitoring Entities .................................................................................................................................. 8 Roles and Responsibilities of Monitoring Entities................................................................................... 8 Requirements to Become Monitoring Entity ......................................................................................... 10 Monitoring Plans ................................................................................................................................... 14 Data Gaps .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Monitoring Sites and Timing................................................................................................................ 16 Field Methods..................................................................................................................................... 17 Data Reporting ................................................................................................................................... 17 References ............................................................................................................................................ 21 Appendix – Senate Bill 6 (7th Extraordinary Session) - Groundwater Monitoring ................................... 22 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1031 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
4 INTRODUCTION TO CASGEM PROGRAM
In November 2009 Part 2.11 (Groundwater Monitoring) was added to Division 6 of the Water Code by Senate Bill 6 (7th Extraordinary Session) (SB 6), a copy of which is included in the Appendix. (All statutory references in this document are to the Water Code.) The new law directs that groundwater elevations in all basins and subbasins in California be regularly and systematically monitored, preferably by local entities, with the goal of demonstrating seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations.

The Department of Water Resources (DWR) is directed to make the resulting information readily and widely available.

DWR developed the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) program in accordance with SB 6 to establish a permanent, locally-managed system to monitor groundwater elevation in California’s alluvial groundwater basins and subbasins identified in DWR Bulletin 118. The CASGEM program will rely and build on the many, established local long-term groundwater monitoring and management programs. DWR’s role is to coordinate information collected locally through the CASGEM program and to maintain the collected groundwater elevation data in a readily and widely available public database. DWR will also continue measuring its current network of groundwater monitoring wells as funding allows.

The goals of the CASGEM program are to:

Establish procedures for notification and data reporting by prospective Monitoring Entities (this document)
Verify local Monitoring Entities in accordance with the Water Code Develop an interface for local entities to enter data into a database compatible with DWR’s Water Data Library
Maintain the database and make it easily accessible to the public and local entities for use in water supply planning and management If no local entities volunteer to monitor groundwater elevations in a basin or part of a basin, DWR may be required to develop a monitoring program for that part. If DWR takes over monitoring of a basin, certain entities in the basin may not be eligible for water grants or loans administered by the state.

During August and September 2010, DWR held 10 workshops throughout the state in cooperation with Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) to introduce the CASGEM program and explain the purpose and process of the program to local agencies and stakeholders. A copy of the DWR presentation is available on the CASGEM website (http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/casgem). A summary of Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1032 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
5 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), primarily from the workshops, is provided in on the CASGEM website.

DWR’s main role is to administer the CASGEM program through providing public outreach; creating and maintaining the CASGEM website and online data submittal system; and, supporting local entities through the process of becoming a Monitoring Entity and preparing Monitoring Plans. DWR will use the CASGEM website to provide up-to-date information on the program. The website will also be the access point for the online notification and data submittal systems.

Staff from the DWR regional offices will be available to assist potential Monitoring Entities with the online notification submittal process. After receiving notification from prospective Monitoring Entities, DWR will review them for completeness, verify the authority of the applying entity under Section 10927, and check for overlapping monitoring areas. DWR will advise each party on the status of their notification within three months of submittal and will work with entities to address any deficiencies in their submittals.

DWR encourages local agencies and groups to collaborate to determine who will serve as the Monitoring Entity for the area. However, if more than one party seeks to become the Monitoring Entity for the same area and overlapping monitoring area issues cannot be resolved locally, DWR will make a final determination of the Monitoring Entity for the area. DWR’s determinations will consider the order in which entities are identified in Section 10927 and other factors as described in the Water Code.

DWR will post the selection of each Monitoring Entity and its monitoring area on the CASGEM website and will notify each Monitoring Entity in writing. A map-based interface will be available for users to identify the Monitoring Entity for each basin in the state.

DWR will prepare the first status report on the CASGEM program for the Governor and Legislature by January 1, 2012. In this initial report, DWR will report on the extent of groundwater elevation monitoring within each basin. This report will include a statewide prioritization of basins based on water supply, water demand, and other factors identified in Section 10933. DWR will explore options for basins without identified monitoring, with a focus on identifying options for local monitoring. Future status reports on the CASGEM program will be prepared by DWR in years ending in 5 or 0.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1033 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
6 PURPOSE OF MONITORING ENTITY REPORTING PROCEDURES
The purpose of these procedures is to introduce the CASGEM program and its components as the framework for implementing SB 6, with particular emphasis on the initial step of establishing Monitoring Entities for each Bulletin 118 basin in the state.

A summary of the requirements of local entities to comply with the CASGEM program is presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Quick Guide for Local Entities
Determine whether you qualify as a potential Monitoring Entity (see “Requirements to become Monitoring Entity” on pages 9-13) Identify the basins within your area (see Bulletin 118) Collaborate with other local entities to identify and choose the prospective Monitoring Entity (or Entities) for your area Submit Monitoring Entity notification to DWR through CASGEM website (http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/casgem) on or before January 1, 2011
DWR will review the notification and advise the prospective Monitoring Entity of the status of the notification within 3 months of submittal Work with staff of the DWR regional office to address any deficiencies in the submittal
If more than one party seeks to become the Monitoring Entity for the same area, work with staff of the DWR regional office to resolve Check the CASGEM website for a listing of the selected Monitoring Entities
Develop and submit a Monitoring Plan to DWR through the CASGEM website
Staff from the DWR regional office are available to assist with the Monitoring Plan and to recommend changes
Submit monitoring data to DWR through the CASGEM website on or before January 1, 2012
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1034 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
7 CASGEM SCHEDULE
A timetable for implementing the CASGEM schedule is shown above.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1035 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
8 MONITORING ENTITIES
The CASGEM program establishes the framework for collaboration between local monitoring parties and DWR to collect groundwater elevation data throughout the state’s 515 basins as defined in Bulletin 118. A Monitoring Entity is a local agency or group that voluntarily takes responsibility for conducting or coordinating groundwater elevation monitoring and reporting for all or part of a groundwater basin.

To determine if you are within a Bulletin 118 basin, please refer to maps and descriptions in Bulletin 118, available online at:
http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/bulletin118/gwbasin_maps_descriptions.cfm.

Geographic Information System (GIS) shapefiles of the basins are also available at this website. DWR can assist in identifying other potential local monitoring parties in each basin.

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF MONITORING ENTITIES
Through the CASGEM program, local entities with appropriate authority may notify DWR of their intent to be a Monitoring Entity. Monitoring Entities will have specific responsibilities, including:

Coordinate with DWR to establish a Monitoring Plan
Conduct or coordinate the regular and systematic monitoring of groundwater elevations as specified in the Monitoring Plan
Submit monitoring data to DWR in a timely manner
A Monitoring Entity can perform monitoring for any number of basins or portions thereof, but no area can have more than one Monitoring Entity. While the Monitoring Entity is responsible for compiling the data and submitting it to DWR for a particular area, the actual measurements can be taken by any number of agencies that would work under the direction of the Monitoring Entity. (Cooperating agencies would submit data to the Monitoring Entity, not to DWR.) Thus, assuming there are no overlapping areas or gaps in basin coverage for a given area, there are three possible basic scenarios, illustrated in Figure 1:

A single Monitoring Entity that collects and reports groundwater elevation data for the entire basin (Scenario A);
Multiple Monitoring Entities that collect and report groundwater elevation data for their portion of the basin (Scenario B); or
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1036 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
9 An umbrella Monitoring Entity that coordinates and reports groundwater elevation data collected by multiple agencies within the basin (Scenario C).

Figure 1. Illustration of possible Monitoring Entity scenarios for a monitored basin.

DWR currently monitors water elevations in about 4,000 wells statewide and cooperates with local and federal agencies to monitor roughly an additional 6,000 wells. DWR plans to continue monitoring groundwater elevations, contingent upon available funding. In some basins DWR currently does most, if not all, of the water-elevation monitoring. In these basins, a local entity still needs to notify DWR of their intent to become the Monitoring Entity. The Monitoring Entity must determine which DWR wells will be included in their CASGEM monitoring network. As long as DWR continues its monitoring program, the department will transmit its groundwater elevation data to the CASGEM system. However, if DWR is unable to continue monitoring for any reason, the Monitoring Entity will be required to re-evaluate its monitoring network to determine which wells to retain in its monitoring network.

Scenario B.

One basin, several
Monitoring Entities
collecting and
submitting data
Scenario C.

One basin, one Monitoring
Entity coordinating and
submitting data collected
by several agencies
Scenario A. One Monitoring
Entity collects and reports
data for entire basin
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1037 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
10 REQUIREMENTS TO BECOME MONITORING ENTITY
Section 10927 of the Water Code defines the types of entities that may assume responsibility for monitoring and reporting groundwater elevations as part of the CASGEM program.

A summary list of eligible entities, in order of priority, and notification requirements for each entity is provided below:

1. A watermaster or water management engineer appointed by a court or pursuant to statute to administer a final judgment determining rights to groundwater [Section 10927(a)].

Notification Requirements:

Name of Agency
Agency Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

2. A groundwater management agency with statutory authority to manage groundwater pursuant to its principal act that is monitoring groundwater elevations in all or a part of a groundwater basin on or before January 1, 2010 [Section 10927(b)(1)].

Notification Requirements:

Name of Agency
Agency Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1038 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
11 Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

3. A water replenishment district established pursuant to Water Code Division 18 (commencing with Section 60000). This part does not expand or otherwise affect the authority of a water replenishment district relating to monitoring elevations [Section 10927(b)(2)].

Notification Requirements:

Name of Agency
Agency Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

4. A local agency that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin pursuant to Water Code Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750) and that was monitoring groundwater elevations in all or part of a groundwater basin on or before January 1, 2010, or a local agency or county that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin pursuant to any other legally enforceable groundwater management plan with provisions that are substantively similar to those described in that part and that was monitoring groundwater elevations in all or a part of a groundwater basin on or before January 1, 2010 [Section 10927(c)].

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1039 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
12 Notification Requirements:

Name of Agency
Agency Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Copy of current groundwater management plan
Statement describing the ability or qualifications of the entity to conduct the groundwater monitoring functions required
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

5. A local agency that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin pursuant to an integrated regional water management plan prepared pursuant to Water Code Part 2.2 (commencing with Section 10530) that includes a groundwater management component that complies with the requirements of Section 10753.7 [Section 10927(d)].

Notification Requirements:

Name of Agency
Agency Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Copy of current groundwater component of integrated regional water management plan
Statement describing the ability or qualifications of the entity to conduct the groundwater monitoring functions required
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1040 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
13 Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

6. A county that is not managing all or a part of a groundwater basin pursuant to a legally enforceable groundwater management plan with provisions that are substantively similar to those described in Water Code Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750) [Section 10927(e)].

Notification Requirements:

Name of County
County Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Statement describing the ability or qualifications of the entity to conduct the groundwater monitoring functions required
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

7. A voluntary cooperative groundwater monitoring association formed pursuant to Section 10935 [Section 10927(f)]. As described in the Water Code Section 10935, the voluntary associations may be established by contract, a joint powers agreement, a memorandum of agreement, or other form of agreement deemed acceptable by DWR, so long as it contains: the names of the participants; the boundaries of the area covered by the agreement; the name or names of the parties responsible for meeting the requirements; the method of recovering the costs associated with meeting the requirements; and other provisions that may be required by DWR. Entities seeking to form a voluntary association should notify DWR, which will work cooperatively with the interested parties to facilitate the formation of the association.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1041 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
14 Notification Requirements:

Name of Association
Association Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Statement describing the ability or qualifications of the entity to conduct the groundwater monitoring functions required
Statement of intent to meet the association formation requirements described in Section 10935
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity
Local agencies are encouraged to coordinate among themselves to determine the proposed Monitoring Entity or Entities that best suits their area. The resulting interested entity (or entities) should notify DWR of its intent to become a groundwater Monitoring Entity for one or more basins, or portions thereof by the January 1, 2011 deadline.

Certain basic information is required for notification, including contact information and additional details depending on the authority of the entity desiring to monitor groundwater (Section 10928), as listed above. This notification information will be submitted to DWR using an online system that will be available by mid-December 2010.

MONITORING PLANS
Monitoring Entities will each develop a Monitoring Plan that includes the following sections: Monitoring Sites and Timing, Field Methods, and Data Reporting. Monitoring Plans should be completed and submitted to DWR by summer 2011. Staff from the DWR regional offices will be available to assist Monitoring Entities with the development of Monitoring Plans, if needed. In determining what information should be reported to DWR, the department will defer to existing monitoring programs if those programs result in information that demonstrates seasonal (annual high and low groundwater elevations) and long-term trends in groundwater elevations. Staff from the DWR regional offices will assist Monitoring Entities to address any gaps in basin coverage Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1042 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
15 (see below) and other monitoring issues and may
make recommendations for the location of additional
wells. However, the department has no authority to
require a Monitoring Entity to install additional wells unless funds are provided for that purpose. Once a
Monitoring Plan is established with DWR, Monitoring
Entities should notify DWR of any changes to the
plan.

DATA GAPS
A data gap refers to a basin or portion of a basin that is not included in any of the Monitoring Plans
submitted to DWR. This is essentially an area that
lacks the density of monitoring wells that would allow
seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater
elevations to be determined for the basin, subbasin,
or a portion thereof. Among the 515 basins defined
by Bulletin 118, data gaps may exist for a variety of
reasons, including a lack of suitable monitoring
wells, lack of groundwater use, access issues, and
jurisdictional issues, among others.

If no local entity is able and/or willing to fill a data gap, the department may be required to perform groundwater monitoring functions. If DWR performs this monitoring, local agencies and the county that have the authority under Section 10927 to monitor the area of the data gap would be potentially ineligible for a water grant or loan awarded or administered by the state. The Monitoring Entity or entities with the authority to monitor the area of the data gap should provide detailed information regarding the nature of and reason for the data gap so that DWR may include such information in the prioritization of groundwater basins and subbasins as appropriate.

Agencies and counties that are eligible to be designated Monitoring Entities but choose not participate in the CASGEM program will not lose their state water grant and loan eligibility if their entire service area qualifies as a disadvantaged community (Water Code Section 10933.7(b)). It will be the responsibility of the local agency or county applying for a state water grant or loan to demonstrate their disadvantaged community status at the time they are applying for the grant or loan.

Key Components of
Monitoring Plans
Submit to DWR by summer 2011
Monitoring Sites and Timing
o Well Network Design
o Selected wells (current)
o Planned (future) wells
o Frequency to capture seasonal
highs and lows
o Map and shapefile of
monitoring area and well
locations
Field Methods for groundwater
monitoring
Methods for measuring
o Reference Point
o Static water level
o Depth to water
o Standardized form for data
collection
Data Reporting
Online data submittal, minimum
July & January each year
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1043 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
16 MONITORING SITES AND TIMING
The Monitoring Plan will identify the wells to be monitored and the frequency with which they will be monitored. The Monitoring Plan should explain how proposed monitoring will be sufficient to demonstrate the seasonal and long-term groundwater elevation trends in the monitored area. The density of monitoring locations will depend on the complexity of the basin.

Because of security concerns, the California Department of Public Health (DPH) routinely limits the disclosure of detailed public water supply well location information. Pursuant to Water Code Section 10931, the DWR is required to collaborate with DPH to ensure that the information reported to the CASGEM program will not result in the inappropriate disclosure of information of concern to DPH. At this time, DWR has reached no agreement with DPH regarding the appropriate treatment of public water supply well data. As a result, CASGEM does not currently plan to use such well information in its database.

The Monitoring Plan should contain a table identifying the wells to be monitored and the timing of that monitoring. Because the law specifies that information should demonstrate seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations, at a minimum monitoring should be conducted at each location for the yearly high and low for the basin. The yearly high and low groundwater elevations typically occur in spring and fall, but this may vary from basin to basin. It is very important that the timing of all the measurements in the basin is coordinated. Rationale for selection of the timing (seasonal highs and lows) should be included in the Monitoring Plan.

The information on the monitoring sites and timing to be submitted in the online system should include:

Well identification number
State well number
Location (decimal latitude and longitude, North American Datum (NAD) 83) Reference point elevation (feet, North American Vertical Datum (NAVD) 88) Land surface datum (feet, NAVD88)
Map and shapefile with monitoring locations, Bulletin 118 groundwater basin boundary, and boundary of monitoring area
Frequency and timing of measurements
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1044 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
17 FIELD METHODS
The consistent and documented collection of groundwater elevation data is important for ensuring that the data can be used across the state, regardless of the Monitoring Entity. The field methods should meet a common set of basic requirements; however, the methods do not have to be exactly the same. Many entities already have in place monitoring efforts that are successful in meeting local needs and that can meet the needs for this program, either as-is or with the incorporation of individual components.

The CASGEM program wishes to maintain, to the greatest extent possible, the procedures of high-quality local groundwater elevation monitoring programs, so long as they meet the overall program goals and policies. Of particular concern are the following basic requirements:

Method(s) to establish the Reference Point, including step-by-step instructions Method(s) to ensure static groundwater elevation
Method(s) to measure depth to water, including step-by-step instructions Method(s) and form(s) for recording measurements
It is the responsibility of each Monitoring Entity to develop and implement monitoring protocols that are appropriate to local groundwater basin conditions, protect the water quality of its monitoring wells, and maintain the quality of the data that it submits to the CASGEM Program. DWR has developed field guidelines (Department of Water Resources Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Guidelines) based on a review of existing field methods from DWR and other organizations, which is available on the CASGEM website. Monitoring Entities are welcome to refer to these guidelines when developing field methods for their own Monitoring Plans. However, the DWR guidelines are for internal use in the event that the Department is required to perform groundwater monitoring functions pursuant to Section 10933.5 and are not binding on any other agency. The core of the CASGEM program will rely and build on the many, established local long-term groundwater monitoring and management programs. The department will defer to existing monitoring programs that result in information that demonstrates seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations.

DATA REPORTING
DWR will develop an online data submittal system for Monitoring Entities to submit their groundwater elevation data. Several methods of submitting data will be available, such as direct online data entry, or upload of data files for batch entry. Initial groundwater elevation data should be submitted to DWR by January 1, 2012. Thereafter, data Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1045 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
18 should be submitted as soon as possible after collection, but no later than January 1st and July 1st of each year, at the minimum. Historical data can also be submitted via the DWR data system to aid in data interpretation. All submitted data will be available to the public, except for confidential data.

Each groundwater elevation data measurement submitted to the online system should include:

Well identification number
Measurement date
Reference point and land surface elevation
Depth to water
Method of measuring water depth
Measurement quality codes
The Monitoring Entity information, well information, and groundwater elevation information is to be provided by the Monitoring Entity. Items labeled as required must be submitted to DWR to report groundwater elevations. Items labeled as recommended should be submitted to DWR if they are available, as they assist in fully evaluating the quality of measurements. DWR will provide standard form(s) for Monitoring Entities to submit groundwater elevation data online. However, if Monitoring Entities cannot use the standard form(s) or provide the data elements listed below, DWR will work cooperatively with Monitoring Entities to develop alternate methods of submitting data.

Entity Information
All entities assuming groundwater monitoring functions as delineated in Section 10927 (a)-(f) are required to submit the following information:

Monitoring Entity's name, address, telephone number, contact person name and email address, and any other relevant contact information (Section 10928 (a) (1), 10928 (b) (1))
Name, address, telephone number, email address and any other relevant contact information for entities collecting data that is submitted by a designated submitting entity (Monitoring Entity)
Groundwater basins being monitored
o Identify entire basins monitored
o Identify partial basins monitored
Well Information
The following information about each well is required for the CASGEM online system:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1046 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
19 Unique well identification number. Agencies may use an existing State Well Number, an existing local well designation, or develop their own identification name, using the following protocol:
o Agency name, abbreviation, or acronym followed by a sequential number (e.g., SGA 01)
o Groundwater basin – followed by a sequential number (e.g., Llagas 03) o Geographic name – followed by a sequential number (e.g., Yolo 12) o Well names should be 15 characters long or less
o Avoid using owner/business names or specific locational information for privacy and security
Decimal latitude/longitude coordinates of well, using horizontal datum NAD83, and the method of determining coordinates (Actual coordinates are preferred; however, Monitoring Entities may submit approximate locations, as needed, to protect the privacy of well owners. For example, to protect the privacy of a well owner, a Monitoring Entity may submit well coordinate locations that are only within 1000-feet of the actual well location.)
Groundwater basin or sub-basin
Reference point elevation of the well (feet) using NAVD88 vertical datum Elevation of land surface datum at the well (feet) using NAVD88 vertical datum Use of well (e.g., dedicated monitoring, irrigation, domestic, etc) Well completion type (e.g. single well, nested, or multi-completion wells) Depth of screened interval(s) and total well depth of well, if available (feet) Well Completion Report number (DWR Form 188), if available The following information about each well is recommended for the CASGEM online system:

State Well Number – assigned by DWR in most cases
Method by which land surface elevation was determined (for example, topographic map, GPS, etc.)
Written description of location of well, including distance from nearby landmarks and location of reference point in relation to well appurtenances (DWR Form 429) Well information comments
Groundwater Elevation Information
The following information for each groundwater elevation measurement is required for the CASGEM online system:

Well identification number (see Well Information, above) Measurement date
Reference point elevation of the well (feet) using NAVD88 vertical datum Elevation of land surface datum at the well (feet) using NAVD88 vertical datum Depth to water below reference point (feet) (unless no measurement was taken) Method of measuring water depth
Measurement Quality Codes
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1047 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
20 o If no measurement is taken, a specified “no measurement” code, must be recorded. Standard codes will be provided by the online system. If a measurement is taken, a “no measurement” code is not recorded.) o If the quality of a measurement is uncertain, a “questionable measurement” code can be recorded. Standard codes will be provided by the online system. If no measurement is taken, a “questionable measurement” code is not recorded.)
Measuring agency identification
The following information for each groundwater elevation measurement is recommended for the CASGEM online system:

Measurement time (PST/PDT with military time/24 hour format) Comments about measurement, if applicable
Groundwater elevation data shall be submitted electronically to DWR’s online system.

DWR will develop electronic data transmittal (EDT) alternatives and data standards to permit bulk data transfer and assist Monitoring Entities in EDT reporting to DWR. As stated above, if Monitoring Entities cannot use the standard form(s) or provide the necessary groundwater elevation data elements, DWR will work cooperatively with Monitoring Entities to develop alternate methods of submitting data.

The CASGEM online data submittal system will be compatible with the Water Data Library (WDL) (http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary/), DWR’s existing groundwater elevation database. The CASGEM system will include data reporting options similar to those in WDL, such as hydrographs, seasonal contour data, and data downloads. The combined accessibility of the WDL and the CASGEM system will be a significant resource for local agencies in making sound groundwater management decisions.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1048 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
21 REFERENCES
California Departement of Water Resources. (2003). California's Groundwater, Bulletin 118-03.

California Department of Water Resources. (2009). California Water Plan Update 2009, Bulletin 160-09.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1049 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
22 APPENDIX – SENATE BILL 6 (7TH EXTRAORDINARY SESSION) -

GROUNDWATER MONITORING
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1050 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
23 Senate Bill No. 6
CHAPTER 1
An act to add Part 2.11 (commencing with Section 10920) to Division 6 of, and to repeal and add Section 12924 of, the Water Code, relating to groundwater. [Approved by Governor November 6, 2009. Filed with
Secretary of State November 6, 2009.]
Legislative Counsel’s Digest
SB 6, Steinberg. Groundwater.
(1) Existing law authorizes a local agency whose service area includes a groundwater basin that is not subject to groundwater management to adopt and implement a groundwater management plan pursuant to certain provisions of law. Existing law requires a groundwater management plan to include certain components to qualify as a plan for the purposes of those provisions, including a provision that establishes funding requirements for the construction of certain groundwater projects.

This bill would establish a groundwater monitoring program pursuant to which specified entities, in accordance with prescribed procedures, may propose to be designated by the Department of Water Resources as groundwater monitoring entities, as defined, for the purposes of monitoring and reporting with regard to groundwater elevations in all or part of a basin or subbasin, as defined. The bill would require the department to work cooperatively with each monitoring entity to determine the manner in which groundwater elevation information should be reported to the department. The bill would authorize the department to make recommendations for improving an existing monitoring program, and to require additional monitoring wells under certain circumstances. Under certain circumstances, the department would be required to perform groundwater monitoring functions. In that event, prescribed entities with authority to assume groundwater monitoring functions with regard to a basin or subbasin for which the department has assumed those functions would not be eligible for a water grant or loan awarded or administered by the state.
(2) Existing law requires the department to conduct an investigation of the state’s groundwater basins and to report its findings to the Governor and the Legislature not later than January 1, 1980.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1051 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
24 This bill would repeal that provision. The department would be required to conduct an investigation of the state’s groundwater basins and to report its findings to the Governor and the Legislature not later than January 1, 2012, and thereafter in years ending in 5 or

0. (3) The bill would take effect only if SB 1 and SB 7 of the 2009–10 7th Extraordinary Session of the Legislature are enacted and become effective.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. Part 2.11 (commencing with Section 10920) is added to Division 6 of the Water Code, to read:

PART 2.11. GROUNDWATER MONITORING
Chapter 1. General Provisions
10920. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature that on or before January 1, 2012, groundwater elevations in all groundwater basins and subbasins be regularly and systematically monitored locally and that the resulting groundwater information be made readily and widely available.
(b) It is further the intent of the Legislature that the department continue to maintain its current network of monitoring wells, including groundwater elevation and groundwater quality monitoring wells, and that the department continue to coordinate monitoring with local entities.
10921. This part does not require the monitoring of groundwater elevations in an area that is not within a basin or subbasin.
10922. This part does not expand or otherwise affect the powers or duties of the department relating to groundwater beyond those expressly granted by this part.

Chapter 2. Definitions
10925. Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions set forth in this section govern the construction of this part.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1052 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
25 (a) “Basin” or “subbasin” means a groundwater basin or subbasin identified and defined in the department’s Bulletin No. 118.
(b) “Bulletin No. 118” means the department’s report entitled “California’s Groundwater:

Bulletin 118” updated in 2003, or as it may be subsequently updated or revised in accordance with Section 12924.
(c) “Monitoring entity” means a party conducting or coordinating the monitoring of groundwater elevations pursuant to this part.
(d) “Monitoring functions” and “groundwater monitoring functions” means the monitoring of groundwater elevations, the reporting of those elevations to the department, and other related actions required by this part.
(e) “Monitoring groundwater elevations” means monitoring groundwater elevations, coordinating the monitoring of groundwater elevations, or both. (f) “Voluntary cooperative groundwater monitoring association” means an association formed for the purposes of monitoring groundwater elevations pursuant to Section 10935.

Chapter 3. Groundwater Monitoring Program
10927. Any of the following entities may assume responsibility for monitoring and reporting groundwater elevations in all or a part of a basin or subbasin in accordance with this part:
(a) A watermaster or water management engineer appointed by a court or pursuant to statute to administer a final judgment determining rights to groundwater. (b) (1) A groundwater management agency with statutory authority to manage groundwater pursuant to its principal act that is monitoring groundwater elevations in all or a part of a groundwater basin or subbasin on or before January 1, 2010. (2) A water replenishment district established pursuant to Division 18 (commencing with Section 60000). This part does not expand or otherwise affect the authority of a water replenishment district relating to monitoring groundwater elevations. (c) A local agency that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin or subbasin pursuant to Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750) and that was monitoring Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1053 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
26 groundwater elevations in all or a part of a groundwater basin or subbasin on or before January 1, 2010, or a local agency or county that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin or subbasin pursuant to any other legally enforceable groundwater management plan with provisions that are substantively similar to those described in that part and that was monitoring groundwater elevations in all or a part of a groundwater basin or subbasin on or before January 1, 2010. (d) A local agency that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin or subbasin pursuant to an integrated regional water management plan prepared pursuant to Part

2.2 (commencing with Section 10530) that includes a groundwater management component that complies with the requirements of Section 10753.7. (e) A county that is not managing all or a part of a groundwater basin or subbasin pursuant to a legally enforceable groundwater management plan with provisions that are substantively similar to those described in Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750).
(f) A voluntary cooperative groundwater monitoring association formed pursuant to Section 10935.
10928. (a) Any entity described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 10927 that seeks to assume groundwater monitoring functions in accordance with this part shall notify the department, in writing, on or before January 1, 2011. The notification shall include all of the following information:
(1) The entity’s name, address, telephone number, and any other relevant contact information.
(2) The specific authority described in Section 10927 pursuant to which the entity qualifies to assume the groundwater monitoring functions. (3) A map showing the area for which the entity is requesting to perform the groundwater monitoring functions.
(4) A statement that the entity will comply with all of the requirements of this part. (b) Any entity described in subdivision (c), (d), (e), or (f) of Section 10927 that seeks to assume groundwater monitoring functions in accordance with this part shall notify the department, in writing, by January 1, 2011. The information provided in the notification shall include all of the following:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1054 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
27 (1) The entity’s name, address, telephone number, and any other relevant contact information.
(2) The specific authority described in Section 10927 pursuant to which the entity qualifies to assume the groundwater monitoring functions. (3) For entities that seek to qualify pursuant to subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 10927, the notification shall also include a copy of the current groundwater management plan or the groundwater component of the integrated regional water management plan, as appropriate.
(4) For entities that seek to qualify pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 10927, the notification shall include a statement of intention to meet the requirements of Section 10935.
(5) A map showing the area for which the entity is proposing to perform the groundwater monitoring functions.
(6) A statement that the entity will comply with all of the requirements of this part. (7) A statement describing the ability and qualifications of the entity to conduct the groundwater monitoring functions required by this part. (c) The department may request additional information that it deems necessary for the purposes of determining the area that is proposed to be monitored or the qualifications of the entity to perform the groundwater monitoring functions. 10929. (a) (1) The department shall review all notifications received pursuant to Section 10928.
(2) Upon the receipt of a notification pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 10928, the department shall verify that the notifying entity has the appropriate authority under subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 10927.
(3) Upon the receipt of a notification pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 10928, the department shall do both of the following:
(A) Verify that each notification is complete.
(B) Assess the qualifications of the notifying party.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1055 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
28 (b) If the department has questions about the completeness or accuracy of a notification, or the qualifications of a party, the department shall contact the party to resolve any deficiencies. If the department is unable to resolve the deficiencies, the department shall notify the party in writing that the notification will not be considered further until the deficiencies are corrected.
(c) If the department determines that more than one party seeks to become the monitoring entity for the same portion of a basin or subbasin, the department shall consult with the interested parties to determine which party will perform the monitoring functions. In determining which party will perform the monitoring functions under this part, the department shall follow the order in which entities are identified in Section 10927.
(d) The department shall advise each party on the status of its notification within three months of receiving the notification.
10930. Upon completion of each review pursuant to Section 10929, the department shall do both of the following if it determines that a party will perform monitoring functions under this part:
(a) Notify the party in writing that it is a monitoring entity and the specific portion of the basin or subbasin for which it shall assume groundwater monitoring functions. (b) Post on the department’s Internet Web site information that identifies the monitoring entity and the portion of the basin or subbasin for which the monitoring entity will be responsible.
10931. (a) The department shall work cooperatively with each monitoring entity to determine the manner in which groundwater elevation information should be reported to the department pursuant to this part. In determining what information should be reported to the department, the department shall defer to existing monitoring programs if those programs result in information that demonstrates seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations. The department shall collaborate with the State Department of Public Health to ensure that the information reported to the department will not result in the inappropriate disclosure of the physical address or geographical location of drinking water sources, storage facilities, pumping operational data, or treatment facilities.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1056 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
29 (b) (1) For the purposes of this part, the department may recommend improvements to an existing monitoring program, including recommendations for additional monitoring wells.
(2) The department may not require additional monitoring wells unless funds are provided for that purpose.
10932. Monitoring entities shall commence monitoring and reporting groundwater elevations pursuant to this part on or before January 1, 2012. 10933. (a) On or before January 1, 2012, the department shall commence to identify the extent of monitoring of groundwater elevations that is being undertaken within each basin and subbasin.
(b) The department shall prioritize groundwater basins and subbasins for the purpose of implementing this section. In prioritizing the basins and subbasins, the department shall, to the extent data are available, consider all of the following:
(1) The population overlying the basin or subbasin.
(2) The rate of current and projected growth of the population overlying the basin or subbasin.
(3) The number of public supply wells that draw from the basin or subbasin. (4) The total number of wells that draw from the basin or subbasin. (5) The irrigated acreage overlying the basin or subbasin. (6) The degree to which persons overlying the basin or subbasin rely on groundwater as their primary source of water.
(7) Any documented impacts on the groundwater within the basin or subbasin, including overdraft, subsidence, saline intrusion, and other water quality degradation. (8) Any other information determined to be relevant by the department. (c) If the department determines that all or part of a basin or subbasin is not being monitored pursuant to this part, the department shall do all of the following:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1057 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
30 (1) Attempt to contact all well owners within the area not being monitored. (2) Determine if there is an interest in establishing any of the following:
(A) A groundwater management plan pursuant to Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750).
(B) An integrated regional water management plan pursuant to Part 2.2 (commencing with Section 10530) that includes a groundwater management component that complies with the requirements of Section 10753.7.
(C) A voluntary groundwater monitoring association pursuant to Section 10935. (d) If the department determines that there is sufficient interest in establishing a plan or association described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c), or if the county agrees to perform the groundwater monitoring functions in accordance with this part, the department shall work cooperatively with the interested parties to comply with the requirements of this part within two years.
(e) If the department determines, with regard to a basin or subbasin, that there is insufficient interest in establishing a plan or association described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c), and if the county decides not to perform the groundwater monitoring and reporting functions of this part, the department shall do all of the following:
(1) Identify any existing monitoring wells that overlie the basin or subbasin that are owned or operated by the department or any other state or federal agency. (2) Determine whether the monitoring wells identified pursuant to paragraph (1) provide sufficient information to demonstrate seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations.
(3) If the department determines that the monitoring wells identified pursuant to paragraph (1) provide sufficient information to demonstrate seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations, the department shall not perform groundwater monitoring functions pursuant to Section 10934.
(4) If the department determines that the monitoring wells identified pursuant to paragraph (1) provide insufficient information to demonstrate seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations, and the State Mining and Geology Board concurs with Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1058 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
31 that determination, the department shall perform groundwater monitoring functions pursuant to Section 10934.1
10933.5. (a) Consistent with Section 10933, the department shall perform the groundwater monitoring functions for those portions of a basin or subbasin for which no monitoring entity has agreed to perform the groundwater monitoring functions. (b) Upon determining that it is required to perform groundwater monitoring functions, the department shall notify both of the following entities that it is forming the groundwater monitoring district:
(1) Each well owner within the affected area.
(2) Each county that contains all or a part of the affected area. (c) The department shall not assess a fee or charge to recover the costs for carrying out its power and duties under this part.
(d) The department may establish regulations to implement this section. 10933.7. (a) If the department is required to perform groundwater monitoring functions pursuant to Section 10933.5, the county and the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, of Section 10927 shall not be eligible for a water grant or loan awarded or administered by the state.
(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the department shall determine that an entity described in subdivision (a) is eligible for a water grant or loan under the circumstances described in subdivision (a) if the entity has submitted to the department for approval documentation demonstrating that its entire service area qualifies as a disadvantaged community.
10934. (a) For purposes of this part, neither any entity described in Section 10927, nor the department, shall have the authority to do either of the following:
(1) To enter private property without the consent of the property owner.

1 The reference in Section 10933(e)(4) to Section 10934 has been amended by Stats. 2010, Ch. 328, sec. 237 (S.B. 1330). The new reference will be to Section 10933.5.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1059 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
32 (2) To require a private property owner to submit groundwater monitoring information to the entity.
(b) This section does not apply to a county or an entity described in subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, of Section 10927 that assumed responsibility for monitoring and reporting groundwater elevations prior to the effective date of this part. 10935. (a) A voluntary cooperative groundwater monitoring association may be formed for the purposes of monitoring groundwater elevations in accordance with this part. The association may be established by contract, a joint powers agreement, a memorandum of agreement, or other form of agreement deemed acceptable by the department. (b) Upon notification to the department by one or more entities that seek to form a voluntary cooperative groundwater monitoring association, the department shall work cooperatively with the interested parties to facilitate the formation of the association. (c) The contract or agreement shall include all of the following:
(1) The names of the participants.
(2) The boundaries of the area covered by the agreement. (3) The name or names of the parties responsible for meeting the requirements of this part.
(4) The method of recovering the costs associated with meeting the requirements of this part.
(5) Other provisions that may be required by the department. 10936. Costs incurred by the department pursuant to this chapter may be funded from unallocated bond revenues pursuant to paragraph (12) of subdivision (a) of Section 75027 of the Public Resources Code, to the extent those funds are available for those purposes.

SEC. 2. Section 12924 of the Water Code is repealed.

SEC. 3. Section 12924 is added to the Water Code, to read:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1060 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
33 12924. (a) The department, in conjunction with other public agencies, shall conduct an investigation of the state’s groundwater basins. The department shall identify the state’s groundwater basins on the basis of geological and hydrological conditions and consideration of political boundary lines whenever practical. The department shall also investigate existing general patterns of groundwater pumping and groundwater recharge within those basins to the extent necessary to identify basins that are subject to critical conditions of overdraft.
(b) The department shall report its findings to the Governor and the Legislature not later than January 1, 2012, and thereafter in years ending in 5 or 0.

SEC. 4. This act shall take effect only if Senate Bill 1 and Senate Bill 7 of the 2009–10 Seventh Extraordinary Session of the Legislature are enacted and become effective.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1061 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1062 of 1274 11507
August 2021
Appendix 3-B
Monitoring Forms and Protocols
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1063 of 1274 Date (YYYY/MM/DD): Site ID:

Well Type: Production / Monitoring / Private Measuring Agency/Entity:

Well Pumping? Is Water Level Static?
Method of Water Level Measurement (see below): Site Status (see below):

Measuring Equipment ID: Measuring Point Elevation (ft NAVD88):

Measured by: Comments:*
NOTES:
*Comments should include quality concerns and changes that affect the representativeness of the measurements (e.g., changes in MP elevation, ownership, well operations, access to measure DTW, etc.) Measuring Point Correction
Water Level below Land Surface
Water Elevation (ft NAVD88)
Site Status: D = dry; O = obstructed; P = pumping; R = recently pumped and recovering; NP = nearby pumping; V = foreign substance; WD = well destroyed; SW = surface water effects; Z = other; S = Static Method of Water Level Measurement: A = airline; B = analog; C = calibrated airline; E = estimated; G = pressure gauge; H = calibrated pressure gage; M = manometer; R = reported; S = steel tape; T = electric tape; V = calibrated electric tape; Z = other.

WATER-LEVEL MEASUREMENT FIELD FORM

WATER LEVEL DATA
Time of Measurement
Measurement (feet)
Tape Correction (feet)
Water Level below MP (feet)
Yucaipa-SGMA Water Level Field Form

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1064 of 1274 Measuring Protocol:
1 2
3 4
5 6
Format instructions and notes:

Site ID: Well identified or State Well No.

MP: measuring point
ft NAVD88: feet above the National Vertical Datum of 1988.

Measuring Equipment ID: serial number or identifier of measuring equipment Disinfect and rinse that part of tape that was submerged below water. Dry tape and rewind.

Check circuitry of electrical tape before lowering the probe into the well by dipping probe into tap water.

Make all readings using the same indicator for consistency (light intensity or sound).

Lower electrode probe slowly into the well until the indicator shows that the circuit is closed and contact with the water surface is made. Place the nail of the index finger on the insulated wire at the MP (Measuring Point) and read the depth-to-water.

Record time of measurement. Record depth to water in the row “Measurement (feet)”. If the tape has been repaired and spliced or has a calibration correction, subtract the “Tape Correction” value from the “Measurement” value and record the difference in the row “Water Level below MP”.

Pull the tape up and make a check measurement by repeating steps 3-4. Record the check measurement in column 2. If check measurement does not agree with the original measurement within 0.02 foot, continue to make measurements until the reason of lack of agreement is determined or the results are shown to be reliable. If more than 2 measurements are made, use best judgment to select measurement most representative of field conditions.

Yucaipa-SGMA Water Level Field Form

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1065 of 1274

WELL PRODUCTION RECORD
Date Time Well ID Totalizer Reading
(Gallons)
Instantaneous
Pumping Rate (GPM)
Estimated Pumping
Rate (GPM)
Model and Make of
Totalizer
Yucaipa-SGMA Well Production Record Page 1 of 1 2021-08-21 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1066 of 1274

WATER QUALITY FIELD FORM
Date (YYYY/MM/DD): Site ID:

Well Type: Production / Monitoring / Private Measuring Agency/Entity:

Well Pumping? If so, how long? Is Initial Water Level Static? Method of Well Purging (see below): Site Status (see below):

Purging Equipment ID: Water Quality Meter ID:

Purge Volume Calculation:
[A] Total depth of well casing (ft bls): [C] Well Casing Inside Diameter (inches):
[B] Static depth to water, if not pumping (ft bls): [D] Length of Water Column, [A] - [B] (ft):

Purge Volume (3 Casing Volumes), ([D] * p/4 * ([C]/12)2 ) * 3 =
Time Purge Rate Temperature (o
C) pH Conductivity
( )
Oxidation-Reduction
Potential (mV)
Dissolved Oxygen
(mg/L)
Turbidity
(NTUs)
Measured by: Comments:*

WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
Yucaipa-SGMA Water Quality Field Form

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1067 of 1274

WATER QUALITY FIELD FORM
NOTES:

Purging and Sampling Protocol:
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Format instructions and notes:

Site ID: Well identifier or State Well No.
ft bls: feet below land surface
Purging Equipment ID/description: serial number or identifier of measuring equipment The Chain-of-Custory form should be filled out as the sample is collected and preserved.

If the well has a dedicated pump and it is operating, ensure that it has been operating consistently and at least three (3) casing volumes have been pumped. If not, note pumping rate and time to purge 3 casing volumes before collecting representative samples.

Measure and record water quality parameters through purging process.

If the well does not have a dedicate pump, then use purging equipment (e.g., portable submersible pump, bailer) to purge well. If using a portable submersible pump, lower pump to depth (consistent with previous smapling events) that ensures pump will not draw water level down to intake and, if possible, is positioned above the top of the well screen.

Ensure that portable purging equipment is properly decontaminated prior to use. Any decontamination must be documented (e.g., material used to decontaminate equipment, rinsing method, containment of waste, waste disposal).

Measure and/or record purge rate periodically. Collect purge sample to measure parameters periodically. Parameters should stablize (within 10% of previous three readings) before collecting the water quality sample.

Use the appropriate sample containers provided by the analytical laboratory. Sample containers shoud be labeled prior to sample collection. The sample label should include: Sample ID (often well ID), sample date and time of collection, sampling personnel, preservative used (if any), and the analytical method to be used on the sample.

All samples should be preserved as soon as possible in an ice chest containing ice. The samples should be chilled and maintained at 4 o
C.
*Comments should include quality concerns and changes that affect the representativeness of the measurements (e.g., changes in pump placement, ownership, well operations, access to sampling port, etc.) Site Status: D = dry; O = obstructed; P = pumping; R = recently pumped and recovering; NP = nearby pumping; V = foreign substance; WD = well destroyed; SW = surface water effects; Z = other; S = Static Method of Well Purging: B = bailer; D = dedicated submersible pump; P = portable submersible pump; T = dedicated turbine pump; S = peristaltic pump.

Yucaipa-SGMA Water Quality Field Form

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1068 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1069 of 1274 State of California
Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor
California Natural Resources Agency
John Laird, Secretary for Natural Resources
Department of Water Resources
Mark W. Cowin, Director
Carl A. Torgersen, Chief Deputy Director
Office of the Chief Counsel Public Affairs Office Government and Community Liaison Spencer Kenner Ed Wilson Anecita S. Agustinez
Office of Workforce Equality Policy Advisor Legislative Affairs Office Stephanie Varrelman Waiman Yip Kasey Schimke, Ass’t Dir.

Deputy Directors
Gary Bardini Integrated Water Management
William Croyle Statewide Emergency Preparedness and Security Mark Anderson State Water Project
John Pacheco (Acting) California Energy Resources Scheduling Kathie Kishaba Business Operations
Taryn Ravazzini Special Initiatives
Division of Integrated Regional Water Management
Arthur Hinojosa Jr., Chief
Prepared under the direction of:

David Gutierrez, Sustainable Groundwater Management Program Manager Rich Juricich, Sustainable Groundwater Management Branch Prepared by:

Trevor Joseph, BMP Project Manager
Timothy Godwin
Dan McManus
Mark Nordberg
Heather Shannon
Steven Springhorn
With assistance from:

DWR Region Office Staff
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1070 of 1274 Groundwater Monitoring Protocols, Standards, and Sites
Best Management Practice

1. OBJECTIVE
The objective of this Best Management Practice (BMP) is to assist in the development of Monitoring Protocols. The California Department of Water Resources (the Department or DWR) has developed this document as part of the obligation in the Technical Assistance chapter (Chapter 7) of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) to support the long-term sustainability of California’s groundwater basins.

Information provided in this BMP provides technical assistance to Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) and other stakeholders to aid in the establishment of consistent data collection processes and procedures. In addition, this BMP can be used by GSAs to adopt a set of sampling and measuring procedures that will yield similar data regardless of the monitoring personnel. Finally, this BMP identifies available resources to support the development of monitoring protocols.

This BMP includes the following sections:

1. Objective. A brief description of how and where monitoring protocols are required under SGMA and the overall objective of this BMP.

2. Use and Limitations. A brief description of the use and limitations of this BMP.

3. Monitoring Protocol Fundamentals. A description of the general approach and background of groundwater monitoring protocols.

4. Relationship of Monitoring Protocols to other BMPs. A description of how this BMP is connected with other BMPS.

5. Technical Assistance. Technical content providing guidance for regulatory sections.

6. Key Definitions. Descriptions of definitions identified in the GSP Regulations or SGMA.

7. Related Materials. References and other materials that provide supporting information related to the development of Groundwater Monitoring Protocols.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1071 of 1274

2. USE AND LIMITATIONS
BMPs developed by the Department provide technical guidance to GSAs and other stakeholders. Practices described in these BMPs do not replace the GSP Regulations, nor do they create new requirements or obligations for GSAs or other stakeholders. In addition, using this BMP to develop a GSP does not equate to an approval determination by the Department. All references to GSP Regulations relate to Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division 2, Chapter 1.5, and Subchapter 2. All references to SGMA relate to California Water Code sections in Division 6, Part 2.74.

3. MONITORING PROTOCOL FUNDAMENTALS
Establishing data collection protocols that are based on best available scientific methods is essential. Protocols that can be applied consistently across all basins will likely yield comparable data. Consistency of data collection methods reduces uncertainty in the comparison of data and facilitates more accurate communication within basins as well as between basins.

Basic minimum technical standards of accuracy lead to quality data that will better support implementation of GSPs.

4. RELATIONSHIP OF MONITORING PROTOCOL TO OTHER BMPS
Groundwater monitoring is a fundamental component of SGMA, as each GSP must include a sufficient network of data that demonstrates measured progress toward the achievement of the sustainability goal for each basin. For this reason, a standard set of protocols need to be developed and utilized.

It is important that data is developed in a manner consistent with the basin setting, planning, and projects/management actions steps identified on Figure 1 and the GSP Regulations. The inclusion of monitoring protocols in the GSP Regulations also emphasizes the importance of quality empirical data to support GSPs and provide comparable information from basin to basin.

Figure 1 provides a logical progression for the development of a GSP and illustrates how monitoring protocols are linked to other related BMPs. This figure also shows the context of the BMPs as they relate to various steps to sustainability as outlined in the GSP Regulations. The monitoring protocol BMP is part of the Monitoring step identified in Figure 1.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1072 of 1274 Figure 1 – Logical Progression of Basin Activities Needed to Increase Basin Sustainability
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1073 of 1274

5. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
The GSP Regulations specifically call out the need to utilize protocols identified in this BMP, or develop similar protocols. The following technical protocols provide guidance based upon existing professional standards and are commonly adopted in various groundwater-related programs. They provide clear techniques that yield quality data for use in the various components of the GSP. They can be further elaborated on by individual GSAs in the form of standard operating procedures which reflect specific local requirements and conditions. While many methodologies are suggested in this BMP, it should be understood that qualified professional judgment should be used to meet the specific monitoring needs.

The following BMPs may be incorporated into a GSP’s monitoring protocols section for collecting groundwater elevation data. A GSP that adopts protocols that deviate from these BMPs must demonstrate that they will yield comparable data.

PROTOCOLS FOR ESTABLISHING A MONITORING PROGRAM
The protocol for establishment of a monitoring program should be evaluated in conjunction with the Monitoring Network and Identification of Data Gaps BMP and other BMPs. Monitoring protocols must take into consideration the Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model, Water Budget, and Modeling BMPs when considering the data needs to meet GSP objectives and the sustainability goal.

It is suggested that each GSP incorporate the Data Quality Objective (DQO) process following the U.S. EPA Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives Process (EPA, 2006). Although strict adherence to this method is not required, it does provide a robust approach to consider and assures that data is collected with a specific purpose in mind, and efforts for monitoring are as efficient as possible to achieve the objectives of the GSP and compliance with the GSP Regulations. 23 CCR §352.2. Monitoring Protocols. Each Plan shall include monitoring protocols adopted by the Agency for data collection and management, as follows:
(a) Monitoring protocols shall be developed according to best management practices. (b) The Agency may rely on monitoring protocols included as part of the best management practices developed by the Department, or may adopt similar monitoring protocols that will yield comparable data.
(c) Monitoring protocols shall be reviewed at least every five years as part of the periodic evaluation of the Plan, and modified as necessary.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1074 of 1274 The DQO process presents a method that can be applied directly to the sustainability criteria quantitative requirements through the following steps.

1. State the problem – Define sustainability indicators and planning considerations of the GSP and sustainability goal.

2. Identify the goal – Describe the quantitative measurable objectives and minimum thresholds for each of the sustainability indicators.

3. Identify the inputs – Describe the data necessary to evaluate the sustainability indicators and other GSP requirements (i.e. water budget).

4. Define the boundaries of the study – This is commonly the extent of the Bulletin 118 groundwater basin or subbasin, unless multiple GSPs are prepared for a given basin. In that case, evaluation of the coordination plan and specifically how the monitoring will be comparable and meet the sustainability goals for the entire basin.

5. Develop an analytical approach – Determine how the quantitative sustainability indicators will be evaluated (i.e. are special analytical methods required that have specific data needs).

6. Specify performance or acceptance criteria – Determine what quality the data must have to achieve the objective and provide some assurance that the analysis is accurate and reliable.

7. Develop a plan for obtaining data – Once the objectives are known determine how these data should be collected. Existing data sources should be used to the greatest extent possible.

These steps of the DQO process should be used to guide GSAs to develop the most efficient monitoring process to meet the measurable objectives of the GSP and the sustainability goal. The DQO process is an iterative process and should be evaluated regularly to improve monitoring efficiencies and meet changing planning and project needs. Following the DQO process, GSAs should also include a data quality control and quality assurance plan to guide the collection of data.

Many monitoring programs already exist as part of ongoing groundwater management or other programs. To the extent possible, the use of existing monitoring data and programs should be utilized to meet the needs for characterization, historical record documentation, and continued monitoring for the SGMA program. However, an evaluation of the existing monitoring data should be performed to assure the data being collected meets the DQOs, regulatory requirements, and data collection protocol described in this BMP. While this BMP provides guidance for collection of various Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1075 of 1274 regulatory based requirements, there is flexibility among the various methodologies available to meet the DQOs based upon professional judgment (local conditions or project needs).

At a minimum, for each monitoring site, the following information or procedure should be collected and documented:
• Long-term access agreements. Access agreements should include year-round site access to allow for increased monitoring frequency.
• A unique identifier that includes a general written description of the site location, date established, access instructions and point of contact (if necessary), type of information to be collected, latitude, longitude, and elevation. Each monitoring location should also track all modifications to the site in a modification log.

PROTOCOLS FOR MEASURING GROUNDWATER LEVELS
This section presents considerations for the methodology of collection of groundwater level data such that it meets the requirements of the GSP Regulations and the DQOs of the specific GSP. Groundwater levels are a fundamental measure of the status of groundwater conditions within a basin. In many cases, relationships of the sustainability indicators may be able to be correlated with groundwater levels. The quality of this data must consider the specific aquifer being monitored and the methodology for collecting these levels.

The following considerations for groundwater level measuring protocols should ensure the following:
• Groundwater level data are taken from the correct location, well ID, and screen interval depth
• Groundwater level data are accurate and reproducible
• Groundwater level data represent conditions that inform appropriate basin management DQOs
• All salient information is recorded to correct, if necessary, and compare data • Data are handled in a way that ensures data integrity Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1076 of 1274 General Well Monitoring Information
The following presents considerations for collection of water level data that include regulatory required components as well as those which are recommended. • Groundwater elevation data will form the basis of basin-wide water-table and piezometric maps, and should approximate conditions at a discrete period in time. Therefore, all groundwater levels in a basin should be collected within as short a time as possible, preferably within a 1 to 2 week period. • Depth to groundwater must be measured relative to an established Reference Point (RP) on the well casing. The RP is usually identified with a permanent marker, paint spot, or a notch in the lip of the well casing. By convention in open casing monitoring wells, the RP reference point is located on the north side of the well casing. If no mark is apparent, the person performing the measurement should measure the depth to groundwater from the north side of the top of the well casing.
• The elevation of the RP of each well must be surveyed to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88), or a local datum that can be converted to NAVD88. The elevation of the RP must be accurate to within 0.5 foot. It is preferable for the RP elevation to be accurate to 0.1 foot or less. Survey grade global navigation satellite system (GNSS) global positioning system (GPS) equipment can achieve similar vertical accuracy when corrected. Guidance for use of GPS can be found at USGS http://water.usgs.gov/osw/gps/. Hand-held GPS units likely will not produce reliable vertical elevation measurement accurate enough for the casing elevation consistent with the DQOs and regulatory requirements.
• The sampler should remove the appropriate cap, lid, or plug that covers the monitoring access point listening for pressure release. If a release is observed, the measurement should follow a period of time to allow the water level to equilibrate.
• Depth to groundwater must be measured to an accuracy of 0.1 foot below the RP.

It is preferable to measure depth to groundwater to an accuracy of 0.01 foot. Air lines and acoustic sounders may not provide the required accuracy of 0.1 foot. • The water level meter should be decontaminated after measuring each well.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1077 of 1274 Where existing wells do not meet the base standard as described in the GSP Regulations or the considerations provided above, new monitoring wells may need to be constructed to meet the DQOs of the GSP. The design, installation, and documentation of new monitoring wells must consider the following:
• Construction consistent with California Well Standards as described in Bulletins 74-81 and 74-90, and local permitting agency standards of practice. • Logging of borehole cuttings under the supervision of a California Professional Geologist and described consistent with the Unified Soil Classification System methods according to ASTM standard D2487-11.
• Written criteria for logging of borehole cuttings for comparison to known geologic formations, principal aquifers and aquitards/aquicludes, or specific marker beds to aid in consistent stratigraphic correlation within and across basins.
• Geophysical surveys of boreholes to aid in consistency of logging practices.

Methodologies should include resistivity, spontaneous potential, spectral gamma, or other methods as appropriate for the conditions. Selection of geophysical methods should be based upon the opinion of a professional geologist or professional engineer, and address the DQOs for the specific borehole and characterization needs.
• Prepare and submit State well completion reports according to the requirements of §13752. Well completion report documentation should include geophysical logs, detailed geologic log, and formation identification as attachments. An example well completion as-built log is illustrated in Figure 2. DWR well completion reports can be filed directly at the Online System for Well Completion Reports (OSWCR) http://water.ca.gov/oswcr/index.cfm.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1078 of 1274 Figure 2 – Example As-Built Multi-Completion Monitoring Well Log Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1079 of 1274 Measuring Groundwater Levels
Well construction, anticipated groundwater level, groundwater level measuring equipment, field conditions, and well operations should be considered prior collection of the groundwater level measurement. The USGS Groundwater Technical Procedures (Cunningham and Schalk, 2011) provide a thorough set of procedures which can be used to establish specific Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for a local agency.

Figure 3 illustrates a typical groundwater level measuring event and simultaneous pressure transducer download.

Figure 3 – Collection of Water Level Measurement and Pressure Transducer Download
The following points provide a general approach for collecting groundwater level measurements:
• Measure depth to water in the well using procedures appropriate for the measuring device. Equipment must be operated and maintained in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Groundwater levels should be measured to the nearest 0.01 foot relative to the RP.
• For measuring wells that are under pressure, allow a period of time for the groundwater levels to stabilize. In these cases, multiple measurements should be collected to ensure the well has reached equilibrium such that no significant changes in water level are observed. Every effort should be made to ensure that a representative stable depth to groundwater is recorded. If a well does not stabilize, the quality of the value should be appropriately qualified as a Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1080 of 1274 questionable measurement. In the event that a well is artesian, site specific procedures should be developed to collect accurate information and be protective of safety conditions associated with a pressurized well. In many cases, an extension pipe may be adequate to stabilize head in the well. Record the dimension of the extension and document measurements and configuration. • The sampler should calculate the groundwater elevation as:

𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺 = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 − 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷
Where:

GWE = Groundwater Elevation
RPE = Reference Point Elevation
DTW = Depth to Water
The sampler must ensure that all measurements are in consistent units of feet, tenths of feet, and hundredths of feet. Measurements and RPEs should not be recorded in feet and inches.

Recording Groundwater Levels
• The sampler should record the well identifier, date, time (24-hour format), RPE, height of RP above or below ground surface, DTW, GWE, and comments regarding any factors that may influence the depth to water readings such as weather, nearby irrigation, flooding, potential for tidal influence, or well condition. If there is a questionable measurement or the measurement cannot be obtained, it should be noted. An example of a field sheet with the required information is shown in Figure 4. It includes questionable measurement and no measurement codes that should be noted. This field sheet is provided as an example. Standardized field forms should be used for all data collection. The aforementioned USGS Groundwater Technical Procedures offers a number of example forms.
• The sampler should replace any well caps or plugs, and lock any well buildings or covers.
• All data should be entered into the GSA data management system (DMS) as soon as possible. Care should be taken to avoid data entry mistakes and the entries should be checked by a second person for compliance with the DQOs.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1081 of 1274 Figure 4 – Example of Water Level Well Data Field Collection Form Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1082 of 1274 Pressure Transducers
Groundwater levels and/or calculated groundwater elevations may be recorded using pressure transducers equipped with data loggers installed in monitoring wells. When installing pressure transducers, care must be exercised to ensure that the data recorded by the transducers is confirmed with hand measurements.

The following general protocols must be followed when installing a pressure transducer in a monitoring well:
• The sampler must use an electronic sounder or chalked steel tape and follow the protocols listed above to measure the groundwater level and calculate the groundwater elevation in the monitoring well to properly program and reference the installation. It is recommended that transducers record measured groundwater level to conserve data capacity; groundwater elevations can be calculated at a later time after downloading.
• The sampler must note the well identifier, the associated transducer serial number, transducer range, transducer accuracy, and cable serial number. • Transducers must be able to record groundwater levels with an accuracy of at least 0.1 foot. Professional judgment should be exercised to ensure that the data being collected is meeting the DQO and that the instrument is capable.

Consideration of the battery life, data storage capacity, range of groundwater level fluctuations, and natural pressure drift of the transducers should be included in the evaluation.
• The sampler must note whether the pressure transducer uses a vented or nonvented cable for barometric compensation. Vented cables are preferred, but nonvented units provide accurate data if properly corrected for natural barometric pressure changes. This requires the consistent logging of barometric pressures to coincide with measurement intervals.
• Follow manufacturer specifications for installation, calibration, data logging intervals, battery life, correction procedure (if non-vented cables used), and anticipated life expectancy to assure that DQOs are being met for the GSP. • Secure the cable to the well head with a well dock or another reliable method.

Mark the cable at the elevation of the reference point with tape or an indelible marker. This will allow estimates of future cable slippage. • The transducer data should periodically be checked against hand measured groundwater levels to monitor electronic drift or cable movement. This should happen during routine site visits, at least annually or as necessary to maintain data integrity.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1083 of 1274 • The data should be downloaded as necessary to ensure no data is lost and entered into the basin’s DMS following the QA/QC program established for the GSP. Data collected with non-vented data logger cables should be corrected for atmospheric barometric pressure changes, as appropriate. After the sampler is confident that the transducer data have been safely downloaded and stored, the data should be deleted from the data logger to ensure that adequate data logger memory remains.

PROTOCOLS FOR SAMPLING GROUNDWATER QUALITY
The following protocols can be incorporated into a GSP’s monitoring protocols for collecting groundwater quality data. More detailed sampling procedures and protocols are included in the standards and guidance documents listed at the end of this BMP. A GSP that adopts protocols that deviate from these BMPs must demonstrate that the adopted protocols will yield comparable data.

In general, the use of existing water quality data within the basin should be done to the greatest extent possible if it achieves the DQOs for the GSP. In some cases it may be necessary to collect additional water quality data to support monitoring programs or evaluate specific projects. The USGS National Field Manual for the Collection of Water Quality Data (Wilde, 2005) should be used to guide the collection of reliable data. Figure 5 illustrates a typical groundwater quality sampling setup.

Figure 5 – Typical Groundwater Quality Sampling Event
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1084 of 1274 All analyses should be performed by a laboratory certified under the State Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program. The specific analytical methods are beyond the scope of this BMP, but should be commiserate with other programs evaluating water quality within the basin for comparative purposes.

Groundwater quality sampling protocols should ensure that:
• Groundwater quality data are taken from the correct location • Groundwater quality data are accurate and reproducible • Groundwater quality data represent conditions that inform appropriate basin management and are consistent with the DQOs
• All salient information is recorded to normalize, if necessary, and compare data • Data are handled in a way that ensures data integrity The following points are general guidance in addition to the techniques presented in the previously mentioned USGS National Field Manual for the Collection of Water Quality Data.

Standardized protocols include the following:
• Prior to sampling, the sampler must contact the laboratory to schedule laboratory time, obtain appropriate sample containers, and clarify any sample holding times or sample preservation requirements.
• Each well used for groundwater quality monitoring must have a unique identifier. This identifier must appear on the well housing or the well casing to avoid confusion.
• In the case of wells with dedicated pumps, samples should be collected at or near the wellhead. Samples should not be collected from storage tanks, at the end of long pipe runs, or after any water treatment.
• The sampler should clean the sampling port and/or sampling equipment and the sampling port and/or sampling equipment must be free of any contaminants. The sampler must decontaminate sampling equipment between sampling locations or wells to avoid cross-contamination between samples.
• The groundwater elevation in the well should be measured following appropriate protocols described above in the groundwater level measuring protocols. • For any well not equipped with low-flow or passive sampling equipment, an adequate volume of water should be purged from the well to ensure that the groundwater sample is representative of ambient groundwater and not stagnant water in the well casing. Purging three well casing volumes is generally Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1085 of 1274 considered adequate. Professional judgment should be used to determine the proper configuration of the sampling equipment with respect to well construction such that a representative ambient groundwater sample is collected. If pumping causes a well to be evacuated (go dry), document the condition and allow well to recover to within 90% of original level prior to sampling. Professional judgment should be exercised as to whether the sample will meet the DQOs and adjusted as necessary.
• Field parameters of pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature should be collected for each sample. Field parameters should be evaluated during the purging of the well and should stabilize prior to sampling. Measurements of pH should only be measured in the field, lab pH analysis are typically unachievable due to short hold times. Other parameters, such as oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen (DO) (in situ measurements preferable), or turbidity, may also be useful for meeting DQOs of GSP and assessing purge conditions. All field instruments should be calibrated daily and evaluated for drift throughout the day.
• Sample containers should be labeled prior to sample collection. The sample label must include: sample ID (often well ID), sample date and time, sample personnel, sample location, preservative used, and analytes and analytical method. • Samples should be collected under laminar flow conditions. This may require reducing pumping rates prior to sample collection.
• Samples should be collected according to appropriate standards such as those listed in the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, USGS National Field Manual for the Collection of Water Quality Data, or other appropriate guidance. The specific sample collection procedure should reflect the type of analysis to be performed and DQOs.
• All samples requiring preservation must be preserved as soon as practically possible, ideally at the time of sample collection. Ensure that samples are appropriately filtered as recommended for the specific analyte. Entrained solids can be dissolved by preservative leading to inconsistent results of dissolve analytes. Specifically, samples to be analyzed for metals should be field-filtered prior to preservation; do not collect an unfiltered sample in a preserved container.
• Samples should be chilled and maintained at 4 °C to prevent degradation of the sample. The laboratory’s Quality Assurance Management Plan should detail appropriate chilling and shipping requirements.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1086 of 1274 • Samples must be shipped under chain of custody documentation to the appropriate laboratory promptly to avoid violating holding time restrictions. • Instruct the laboratory to use reporting limits that are equal to or less than the applicable DQOs or regional water quality objectives/screening levels.

Special protocols for low-flow sampling equipment
In addition to the protocols listed above, sampling using low-flow sample equipment should adopt the following protocols derived from EPA’s Low-flow (minimal drawdown) ground-water sampling procedures (Puls and Barcelona, 1996). These protocols apply to low-flow sampling equipment that generally pumps between 0.1 and 0.5 liters per minute. These protocols are not intended for bailers.

Special protocols for passive sampling equipment
In addition to the protocols listed above, passive diffusion samplers should follow protocols set forth in USGS Fact Sheet 088-00.

PROTOCOLS FOR MONITORING SEAWATER INTRUSION
Monitoring seawater intrusion requires analysis of the chloride concentrations within groundwater of each principal aquifer subject to seawater intrusion. While no significant standardized approach exists, the methodologies described above for degraded water quality can be applied for the collection of groundwater samples. In addition to the protocol described above, the following protocols should be followed:
• Water quality samples should be collected and analyzed at least semi-annually.

Samples will be analyzed for dissolved chloride at a minimum. It may be beneficial to include analyses of iodide and bromide to aid in determination of salinity source. More frequent sampling may be necessary to meet DQOs of GSP.

The development of surrogate measures of chloride concentration may facilitate cost-effective means to monitor more frequently to observe the range of conditions and variability of the flow dynamics controlling seawater intrusion. • Groundwater levels will be collected at a frequency adequate to characterize changes in head in the vicinity of the leading edge of degraded water quality in each principal aquifer. Frequency may need to be increased in areas of known preferential pathways, groundwater pumping, or efficacy evaluation of mitigation projects.
• The use of geophysical surveys, electrical resistivity, or other methods may provide for identification of preferential pathways and optimize monitoring well placement and evaluation of the seawater intrusion front. Professional judgment Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1087 of 1274 should be exercised to determine the appropriate methodology and whether the DQOs for the GSP would be met.

PROTOCOLS FOR MEASURING STREAMFLOW
Monitoring of streamflow is necessary for incorporation into water budget analysis and for use in evaluation of stream depletions associated with groundwater extractions. The use of existing monitoring locations should be incorporated to the greatest extent possible. Many of these streamflow monitoring locations currently follow the protocol described below.

Establishment of new streamflow discharge sites should consider the existing network and the objectives of the new location. Professional judgment should be used to determine the appropriate permitting that may be necessary for the installation of any monitoring locations along surface water bodies. Regular frequent access will be necessary to these sites for the development of ratings curves and maintenance of equipment.

To establish a new streamflow monitoring station special consideration must be made in the field to select an appropriate location for measuring discharge. Once a site is selected, development of a relationship of stream stage to discharge will be necessary to provide continuous estimates of streamflow. Several measurements of discharge at a variety of stream stages will be necessary to develop the ratings curve correlating stage to discharge. The use of Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) can provide accurate estimates of discharge in the correct settings. Professional judgment must be exercised to determine the appropriate methodology. Following development of the ratings curve a simple stilling well and pressure transducer with data logger can be used to evaluate stage on a frequent basis. A simple stilling well and staff gage is illustrated in Figure 6.

Streamflow measurements should be collected, analyzed, and reported in accordance with the procedures outlined in USGS Water Supply Paper 2175, Volume 1. – Measurement of Stage Discharge and Volume 2. – Computation of Discharge. This methodology is currently being used by both the USGS and DWR for existing streamflow monitoring throughout the State.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1088 of 1274 Figure 6 – Simple Stilling Well and Staff Gage Setup

PROTOCOLS FOR MEASURING SUBSIDENCE
Evaluating and monitoring inelastic land subsidence can utilize multiple data sources to evaluate the specific conditions and associated causes. To the extent possible, the use of existing data should be utilized. Subsidence can be estimated from numerous techniques, they include: level surveying tied to known stable benchmarks or benchmarks located outside the area being studied for possible subsidence; installing and tracking changes in borehole extensometers; obtaining data from continuous GPS (CGPS) locations, static GPS surveys or Real-Time-Kinematic (RTK) surveys; or analyzing Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data. No standard procedures exist for collecting data from the potential subsidence monitoring approaches. However, an approach may include:
• Identification of land subsidence conditions.
o Evaluate existing regional long-term leveling surveys of regional infrastructure, i.e. roadways, railroads, canals, and levees. o Inspect existing county and State well records where collapse has been noted for well repairs or replacement.
o Determine if significant fine-grained layers are present such that the potential for collapse of the units could occur should there be significant depressurization of the aquifer system.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1089 of 1274 o Inspect geologic logs and the hydrogeologic conceptual model to aid in identification of specific units of concern.
o Collect regional remote-sensing information such as InSAR, commonly provided by USGS and NASA. Data availability is currently limited, but future resources are being developed.
• Monitor regions of suspected subsidence where potential exists. o Establish CGPS network to evaluate changes in land surface elevation. o Establish leveling surveys transects to observe changes in land surface elevation.
o Establish extensometer network to observe land subsidence. An example of a typical extensometer design is illustrated in Figure 7. There are a variety of extensometer designs and they should be selected based on the specific DQOs.

Various standards and guidance documents for collecting data include:
• Leveling surveys must follow surveying standards set out in the California Department of Transportation’s Caltrans Surveys Manual. • GPS surveys must follow surveying standards set out in the California Department of Transportation’s Caltrans Surveys Manual. • USGS has been performing subsidence surveys within several areas of California.

These studies are sound examples for appropriate methods and should be utilized to the extent possible and where available:
o http://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidencemeasuring.html • Instruments installed in borehole extensometers must follow the manufacturer’s instructions for installation, care, and calibration.
• Availability of InSAR data is improving and will increase as programs are developed. This method requires expertise in analysis of the raw data and will likely be made available as an interpretative report for specific regions.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1090 of 1274 Figure 7 – Simplified Extensometer Diagram
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1091 of 1274

6. KEY DEFINITIONS
The key definitions and sections related to Groundwater Monitoring Protocols, Standards, and Sites outlined in applicable SGMA code and regulations are provided below for reference.

Groundwater Sustainability Plan Regulations (California Code of Regulations §351) • §351(h) “Best available science” refers to the use of sufficient and credible information and data, specific to the decision being made and the time frame available for making that decision, that is consistent with scientific and engineering professional standards of practice.
• §351(i) “Best management practice” refers to a practice, or combination of practices, that are designed to achieve sustainable groundwater management and have been determined to be technologically and economically effective, practicable, and based on best available science.

Monitoring Protocols Reference
§352.2. Monitoring Protocols
Each Plan shall include monitoring protocols adopted by the Agency for data collection and management, as follows:
(a) Monitoring protocols shall be developed according to best management practices.
(b) The Agency may rely on monitoring protocols included as part of the best management practices developed by the Department, or may adopt similar monitoring protocols that will yield comparable data.
(c) Monitoring protocols shall be reviewed at least every five years as part of the periodic evaluation of the Plan, and modified as necessary.

SGMA Reference
§10727.2. Required Plan Elements
(f) Monitoring protocols that are designed to detect changes in groundwater levels, groundwater quality, inelastic surface subsidence for basins for which subsidence has been identified as a potential problem, and flow and quality of surface water that directly affect groundwater levels or quality or are caused by groundwater extraction in the basin. The monitoring protocols shall be designed to generate information that promotes efficient and effective groundwater management.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1092 of 1274

7. RELATED MATERIALS

CASE STUDIES
Luhdorff & Scalmanini Consulting Engineers, J.W. Borchers, M. Carpenter. 2014. Land Subsidence from Groundwater Use in California. Full Report of Findings prepared for California Water Foundation. April 2014. 151 p.
http://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidence-cause-effect.html Faunt, C.C., M. Sneed, J. Traum, and J.T. Brandt, 2015. Water availability and land subsidence in the Central Valley, California, USA. Hydrogeol J (2016) 24: 675. doi:10.1007/s10040-015-1339-x.
https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/701605
Poland, J.F., B.E. Lofgren, R.L. Ireland, and R.G. Pugh, 1975. Land subsidence in the San Joaquin Valley, California, as of 1972; US Geological Survey Professional Paper 437-H; prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources, 87 p. http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0437h/report.pdf
Sneed, M., J.T. Brandt, and M. Solt, 2013. Land subsidence along the Delta-Mendota Canal in the northern part of the San Joaquin Valley, California, 2003-10; USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2013-5142, prepared in cooperation with U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20135142
Sneed, M., J.T. Brandt, and M. Solt, 2014. Land subsidence, groundwater levels, and geology in the Coachella Valley, California, 1993–2010: U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5075, 62 p.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20145075.

STANDARDS
California Department of Transportation, various dates. Caltrans Surveys Manual. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/row/landsurveys/SurveysManual/Manual_TOC.html U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006. Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives Process, EPA QA/G-4
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/guidance_systematic_planning_ dqo_process.pdf
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1093 of 1274 Rice, E.W., R.B. Baire, A.D. Eaton, and L.S. Clesceri ed. 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation.

GUIDANCE
Barcelona, M.J., J.P. Gibb, J.A. Helfrich, and E.E.Graske. 1985. Practical Guide for GroundWater Sampling. Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Illinois, 103 pages. www.orau.org/ptp/PTP%20Library/library/epa/samplings/pracgw.pdf Buchanan, T.J., and W.P. Somers, 1969. Discharge measurements at gaging stations; techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geologic Survey chapter A8, Washington D.C. http://pubs.usgs.gov/twri/twri3a8/html/pdf.html Cunningham, W.L., and Schalk, C.W., comps., 2011, Groundwater technical procedures of the U.S. Geological Survey: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 1–A1. https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/1a1/pdf/tm1-a1.pdf
California Department of Water Resources, 2010. Groundwater elevation monitoring guidelines.
http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/casgem/pdfs/CASGEM%20DWR%20GW%20Gu idelines%20Final%20121510.pdf
Holmes, R.R. Jr., P.J. Terrio, M.A. Harris, and P.C. Mills, 2001. Introduction to field methods for hydrologic and environmental studies, open-file report 01-50, USGS, Urbana, Illinois, 241 p. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr0150 Puls, R.W., and Barcelona, M.J., 1996, Low-Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground-Water Sampling Procedures; US EPA, Ground Water Issue EPA/540/S-95/504. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/lwflw2a.pdf Rantz, S.E., and others, 1982. Measurement and computation of streamflow; U.S. Geological Survey, Water Supply Paper 2175. http://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/wsp2175/#table Subcommittee on Ground Water of the Advisory Committee on Water Information, 2013. A national framework for ground-water monitoring in the United States. http://acwi.gov/sogw/ngwmn_framework_report_july2013.pdf Vail, J., D. France, and B. Lewis. 2013. Operating Procedure: Groundwater Sampling SESDPROC-301-R3.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1094 of 1274 https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/GroundwaterSampling.pdf Wilde, F.D., January 2005. Preparations for water sampling (ver. 2.0): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chap. A1, http://water.usgs.gov/owq/FieldManual/compiled/NFM_complete.pdf

ONLINE RESOURCES
Online System for Well Completion Reports (OSWCR). California Department of Water Resources. http://water.ca.gov/oswcr/index.cfm
Measuring Land Subsidence web page. U.S. Geological Survey. http://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidence-measuring.html USGS Global Positioning Application and Practice web page. U.S. Geological Survey. http://water.usgs.gov/osw/gps/
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1095 of 1274 California Statewide Groundwater
Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) Program
Procedures for
Monitoring Entity Reporting
December 2010
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1096 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
2 Department of Water Resources (DWR) will use the internet as the primary communication tool to notify interested parties and groundwater Monitoring Entities of the status of the CASGEM program on an ongoing basis. Information will be posted at the following website: http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/casgem In addition to the above-referenced website, DWR will distribute information via email. In order to be placed on the CASGEM contact list, please register your contact information at the following website: http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/casgem/register/ For questions about the Reporting Procedures, or other technical issues, please contact:

DWR Headquarters
Mary Scruggs
901 P Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 654-1324
[email protected]
Northern Region Office
Kelly Staton
2440 Main Street
Red Bluff, CA 96080
530-529-7344
[email protected]
North Central Region
Office
Chris Bonds
3500 Industrial Avenue
West Sacramento, CA
95691
(916) 376-9657
[email protected]
South Central Region
Office
Dane Mathis
3374 Shields Avenue
Fresno, CA 93726
(559) 230-3354
[email protected]
Southern Region Office
Tim Ross
770 Fairmont Avenue
Suite 102
Glendale, CA 91203
(818) 500-1645 x278
[email protected]
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1097 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction to CASGEM Program ........................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of Monitoring Entity Reporting Procedures ................................................................................ 6 CASGEM Schedule ................................................................................................................................... 7 Monitoring Entities .................................................................................................................................. 8 Roles and Responsibilities of Monitoring Entities................................................................................... 8 Requirements to Become Monitoring Entity ......................................................................................... 10 Monitoring Plans ................................................................................................................................... 14 Data Gaps .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Monitoring Sites and Timing................................................................................................................ 16 Field Methods..................................................................................................................................... 17 Data Reporting ................................................................................................................................... 17 References ............................................................................................................................................ 21 Appendix – Senate Bill 6 (7th Extraordinary Session) - Groundwater Monitoring ................................... 22 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1098 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
4 INTRODUCTION TO CASGEM PROGRAM
In November 2009 Part 2.11 (Groundwater Monitoring) was added to Division 6 of the Water Code by Senate Bill 6 (7th Extraordinary Session) (SB 6), a copy of which is included in the Appendix. (All statutory references in this document are to the Water Code.) The new law directs that groundwater elevations in all basins and subbasins in California be regularly and systematically monitored, preferably by local entities, with the goal of demonstrating seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations.

The Department of Water Resources (DWR) is directed to make the resulting information readily and widely available.

DWR developed the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) program in accordance with SB 6 to establish a permanent, locally-managed system to monitor groundwater elevation in California’s alluvial groundwater basins and subbasins identified in DWR Bulletin 118. The CASGEM program will rely and build on the many, established local long-term groundwater monitoring and management programs. DWR’s role is to coordinate information collected locally through the CASGEM program and to maintain the collected groundwater elevation data in a readily and widely available public database. DWR will also continue measuring its current network of groundwater monitoring wells as funding allows.

The goals of the CASGEM program are to:

Establish procedures for notification and data reporting by prospective Monitoring Entities (this document)
Verify local Monitoring Entities in accordance with the Water Code Develop an interface for local entities to enter data into a database compatible with DWR’s Water Data Library
Maintain the database and make it easily accessible to the public and local entities for use in water supply planning and management If no local entities volunteer to monitor groundwater elevations in a basin or part of a basin, DWR may be required to develop a monitoring program for that part. If DWR takes over monitoring of a basin, certain entities in the basin may not be eligible for water grants or loans administered by the state.

During August and September 2010, DWR held 10 workshops throughout the state in cooperation with Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) to introduce the CASGEM program and explain the purpose and process of the program to local agencies and stakeholders. A copy of the DWR presentation is available on the CASGEM website (http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/casgem). A summary of Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1099 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
5 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), primarily from the workshops, is provided in on the CASGEM website.

DWR’s main role is to administer the CASGEM program through providing public outreach; creating and maintaining the CASGEM website and online data submittal system; and, supporting local entities through the process of becoming a Monitoring Entity and preparing Monitoring Plans. DWR will use the CASGEM website to provide up-to-date information on the program. The website will also be the access point for the online notification and data submittal systems.

Staff from the DWR regional offices will be available to assist potential Monitoring Entities with the online notification submittal process. After receiving notification from prospective Monitoring Entities, DWR will review them for completeness, verify the authority of the applying entity under Section 10927, and check for overlapping monitoring areas. DWR will advise each party on the status of their notification within three months of submittal and will work with entities to address any deficiencies in their submittals.

DWR encourages local agencies and groups to collaborate to determine who will serve as the Monitoring Entity for the area. However, if more than one party seeks to become the Monitoring Entity for the same area and overlapping monitoring area issues cannot be resolved locally, DWR will make a final determination of the Monitoring Entity for the area. DWR’s determinations will consider the order in which entities are identified in Section 10927 and other factors as described in the Water Code.

DWR will post the selection of each Monitoring Entity and its monitoring area on the CASGEM website and will notify each Monitoring Entity in writing. A map-based interface will be available for users to identify the Monitoring Entity for each basin in the state.

DWR will prepare the first status report on the CASGEM program for the Governor and Legislature by January 1, 2012. In this initial report, DWR will report on the extent of groundwater elevation monitoring within each basin. This report will include a statewide prioritization of basins based on water supply, water demand, and other factors identified in Section 10933. DWR will explore options for basins without identified monitoring, with a focus on identifying options for local monitoring. Future status reports on the CASGEM program will be prepared by DWR in years ending in 5 or 0.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1100 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
6 PURPOSE OF MONITORING ENTITY REPORTING PROCEDURES
The purpose of these procedures is to introduce the CASGEM program and its components as the framework for implementing SB 6, with particular emphasis on the initial step of establishing Monitoring Entities for each Bulletin 118 basin in the state.

A summary of the requirements of local entities to comply with the CASGEM program is presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Quick Guide for Local Entities
Determine whether you qualify as a potential Monitoring Entity (see “Requirements to become Monitoring Entity” on pages 9-13) Identify the basins within your area (see Bulletin 118) Collaborate with other local entities to identify and choose the prospective Monitoring Entity (or Entities) for your area Submit Monitoring Entity notification to DWR through CASGEM website (http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/casgem) on or before January 1, 2011
DWR will review the notification and advise the prospective Monitoring Entity of the status of the notification within 3 months of submittal Work with staff of the DWR regional office to address any deficiencies in the submittal
If more than one party seeks to become the Monitoring Entity for the same area, work with staff of the DWR regional office to resolve Check the CASGEM website for a listing of the selected Monitoring Entities
Develop and submit a Monitoring Plan to DWR through the CASGEM website
Staff from the DWR regional office are available to assist with the Monitoring Plan and to recommend changes
Submit monitoring data to DWR through the CASGEM website on or before January 1, 2012
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1101 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
7 CASGEM SCHEDULE
A timetable for implementing the CASGEM schedule is shown above.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1102 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
8 MONITORING ENTITIES
The CASGEM program establishes the framework for collaboration between local monitoring parties and DWR to collect groundwater elevation data throughout the state’s 515 basins as defined in Bulletin 118. A Monitoring Entity is a local agency or group that voluntarily takes responsibility for conducting or coordinating groundwater elevation monitoring and reporting for all or part of a groundwater basin.

To determine if you are within a Bulletin 118 basin, please refer to maps and descriptions in Bulletin 118, available online at:
http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/bulletin118/gwbasin_maps_descriptions.cfm.

Geographic Information System (GIS) shapefiles of the basins are also available at this website. DWR can assist in identifying other potential local monitoring parties in each basin.

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF MONITORING ENTITIES
Through the CASGEM program, local entities with appropriate authority may notify DWR of their intent to be a Monitoring Entity. Monitoring Entities will have specific responsibilities, including:

Coordinate with DWR to establish a Monitoring Plan
Conduct or coordinate the regular and systematic monitoring of groundwater elevations as specified in the Monitoring Plan
Submit monitoring data to DWR in a timely manner
A Monitoring Entity can perform monitoring for any number of basins or portions thereof, but no area can have more than one Monitoring Entity. While the Monitoring Entity is responsible for compiling the data and submitting it to DWR for a particular area, the actual measurements can be taken by any number of agencies that would work under the direction of the Monitoring Entity. (Cooperating agencies would submit data to the Monitoring Entity, not to DWR.) Thus, assuming there are no overlapping areas or gaps in basin coverage for a given area, there are three possible basic scenarios, illustrated in Figure 1:

A single Monitoring Entity that collects and reports groundwater elevation data for the entire basin (Scenario A);
Multiple Monitoring Entities that collect and report groundwater elevation data for their portion of the basin (Scenario B); or
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1103 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
9 An umbrella Monitoring Entity that coordinates and reports groundwater elevation data collected by multiple agencies within the basin (Scenario C).

Figure 1. Illustration of possible Monitoring Entity scenarios for a monitored basin.

DWR currently monitors water elevations in about 4,000 wells statewide and cooperates with local and federal agencies to monitor roughly an additional 6,000 wells. DWR plans to continue monitoring groundwater elevations, contingent upon available funding. In some basins DWR currently does most, if not all, of the water-elevation monitoring. In these basins, a local entity still needs to notify DWR of their intent to become the Monitoring Entity. The Monitoring Entity must determine which DWR wells will be included in their CASGEM monitoring network. As long as DWR continues its monitoring program, the department will transmit its groundwater elevation data to the CASGEM system. However, if DWR is unable to continue monitoring for any reason, the Monitoring Entity will be required to re-evaluate its monitoring network to determine which wells to retain in its monitoring network.

Scenario B.

One basin, several
Monitoring Entities
collecting and
submitting data
Scenario C.

One basin, one Monitoring
Entity coordinating and
submitting data collected
by several agencies
Scenario A. One Monitoring
Entity collects and reports
data for entire basin
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1104 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
10 REQUIREMENTS TO BECOME MONITORING ENTITY
Section 10927 of the Water Code defines the types of entities that may assume responsibility for monitoring and reporting groundwater elevations as part of the CASGEM program.

A summary list of eligible entities, in order of priority, and notification requirements for each entity is provided below:

1. A watermaster or water management engineer appointed by a court or pursuant to statute to administer a final judgment determining rights to groundwater [Section 10927(a)].

Notification Requirements:

Name of Agency
Agency Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

2. A groundwater management agency with statutory authority to manage groundwater pursuant to its principal act that is monitoring groundwater elevations in all or a part of a groundwater basin on or before January 1, 2010 [Section 10927(b)(1)].

Notification Requirements:

Name of Agency
Agency Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1105 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
11 Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

3. A water replenishment district established pursuant to Water Code Division 18 (commencing with Section 60000). This part does not expand or otherwise affect the authority of a water replenishment district relating to monitoring elevations [Section 10927(b)(2)].

Notification Requirements:

Name of Agency
Agency Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

4. A local agency that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin pursuant to Water Code Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750) and that was monitoring groundwater elevations in all or part of a groundwater basin on or before January 1, 2010, or a local agency or county that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin pursuant to any other legally enforceable groundwater management plan with provisions that are substantively similar to those described in that part and that was monitoring groundwater elevations in all or a part of a groundwater basin on or before January 1, 2010 [Section 10927(c)].

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1106 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
12 Notification Requirements:

Name of Agency
Agency Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Copy of current groundwater management plan
Statement describing the ability or qualifications of the entity to conduct the groundwater monitoring functions required
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

5. A local agency that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin pursuant to an integrated regional water management plan prepared pursuant to Water Code Part 2.2 (commencing with Section 10530) that includes a groundwater management component that complies with the requirements of Section 10753.7 [Section 10927(d)].

Notification Requirements:

Name of Agency
Agency Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Copy of current groundwater component of integrated regional water management plan
Statement describing the ability or qualifications of the entity to conduct the groundwater monitoring functions required
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1107 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
13 Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

6. A county that is not managing all or a part of a groundwater basin pursuant to a legally enforceable groundwater management plan with provisions that are substantively similar to those described in Water Code Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750) [Section 10927(e)].

Notification Requirements:

Name of County
County Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Statement describing the ability or qualifications of the entity to conduct the groundwater monitoring functions required
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity

7. A voluntary cooperative groundwater monitoring association formed pursuant to Section 10935 [Section 10927(f)]. As described in the Water Code Section 10935, the voluntary associations may be established by contract, a joint powers agreement, a memorandum of agreement, or other form of agreement deemed acceptable by DWR, so long as it contains: the names of the participants; the boundaries of the area covered by the agreement; the name or names of the parties responsible for meeting the requirements; the method of recovering the costs associated with meeting the requirements; and other provisions that may be required by DWR. Entities seeking to form a voluntary association should notify DWR, which will work cooperatively with the interested parties to facilitate the formation of the association.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1108 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
14 Notification Requirements:

Name of Association
Association Contact Name
Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Any other relevant contact information
Authority (as listed in Section 10927)
Name and number of basin to be monitored (from Bulletin 118) Map and shapefile showing area to be monitored (Shapefiles do not need to be submitted by the initial January 1, 2011 notification date; Regional Offices can provide assistance to potential Monitoring Entities with shapefiles.) Statement that the entity will comply with the requirements of Water Code Part 2.11
Statement describing the ability or qualifications of the entity to conduct the groundwater monitoring functions required
Statement of intent to meet the association formation requirements described in Section 10935
Additional information deemed necessary by DWR to identify monitoring area or qualifications of the Monitoring Entity
Local agencies are encouraged to coordinate among themselves to determine the proposed Monitoring Entity or Entities that best suits their area. The resulting interested entity (or entities) should notify DWR of its intent to become a groundwater Monitoring Entity for one or more basins, or portions thereof by the January 1, 2011 deadline.

Certain basic information is required for notification, including contact information and additional details depending on the authority of the entity desiring to monitor groundwater (Section 10928), as listed above. This notification information will be submitted to DWR using an online system that will be available by mid-December 2010.

MONITORING PLANS
Monitoring Entities will each develop a Monitoring Plan that includes the following sections: Monitoring Sites and Timing, Field Methods, and Data Reporting. Monitoring Plans should be completed and submitted to DWR by summer 2011. Staff from the DWR regional offices will be available to assist Monitoring Entities with the development of Monitoring Plans, if needed. In determining what information should be reported to DWR, the department will defer to existing monitoring programs if those programs result in information that demonstrates seasonal (annual high and low groundwater elevations) and long-term trends in groundwater elevations. Staff from the DWR regional offices will assist Monitoring Entities to address any gaps in basin coverage Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1109 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
15 (see below) and other monitoring issues and may
make recommendations for the location of additional
wells. However, the department has no authority to
require a Monitoring Entity to install additional wells unless funds are provided for that purpose. Once a
Monitoring Plan is established with DWR, Monitoring
Entities should notify DWR of any changes to the
plan.

DATA GAPS
A data gap refers to a basin or portion of a basin that is not included in any of the Monitoring Plans
submitted to DWR. This is essentially an area that
lacks the density of monitoring wells that would allow
seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater
elevations to be determined for the basin, subbasin,
or a portion thereof. Among the 515 basins defined
by Bulletin 118, data gaps may exist for a variety of
reasons, including a lack of suitable monitoring
wells, lack of groundwater use, access issues, and
jurisdictional issues, among others.

If no local entity is able and/or willing to fill a data gap, the department may be required to perform groundwater monitoring functions. If DWR performs this monitoring, local agencies and the county that have the authority under Section 10927 to monitor the area of the data gap would be potentially ineligible for a water grant or loan awarded or administered by the state. The Monitoring Entity or entities with the authority to monitor the area of the data gap should provide detailed information regarding the nature of and reason for the data gap so that DWR may include such information in the prioritization of groundwater basins and subbasins as appropriate.

Agencies and counties that are eligible to be designated Monitoring Entities but choose not participate in the CASGEM program will not lose their state water grant and loan eligibility if their entire service area qualifies as a disadvantaged community (Water Code Section 10933.7(b)). It will be the responsibility of the local agency or county applying for a state water grant or loan to demonstrate their disadvantaged community status at the time they are applying for the grant or loan.

Key Components of
Monitoring Plans
Submit to DWR by summer 2011
Monitoring Sites and Timing
o Well Network Design
o Selected wells (current)
o Planned (future) wells
o Frequency to capture seasonal
highs and lows
o Map and shapefile of
monitoring area and well
locations
Field Methods for groundwater
monitoring
Methods for measuring
o Reference Point
o Static water level
o Depth to water
o Standardized form for data
collection
Data Reporting
Online data submittal, minimum
July & January each year
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1110 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
16 MONITORING SITES AND TIMING
The Monitoring Plan will identify the wells to be monitored and the frequency with which they will be monitored. The Monitoring Plan should explain how proposed monitoring will be sufficient to demonstrate the seasonal and long-term groundwater elevation trends in the monitored area. The density of monitoring locations will depend on the complexity of the basin.

Because of security concerns, the California Department of Public Health (DPH) routinely limits the disclosure of detailed public water supply well location information. Pursuant to Water Code Section 10931, the DWR is required to collaborate with DPH to ensure that the information reported to the CASGEM program will not result in the inappropriate disclosure of information of concern to DPH. At this time, DWR has reached no agreement with DPH regarding the appropriate treatment of public water supply well data. As a result, CASGEM does not currently plan to use such well information in its database.

The Monitoring Plan should contain a table identifying the wells to be monitored and the timing of that monitoring. Because the law specifies that information should demonstrate seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations, at a minimum monitoring should be conducted at each location for the yearly high and low for the basin. The yearly high and low groundwater elevations typically occur in spring and fall, but this may vary from basin to basin. It is very important that the timing of all the measurements in the basin is coordinated. Rationale for selection of the timing (seasonal highs and lows) should be included in the Monitoring Plan.

The information on the monitoring sites and timing to be submitted in the online system should include:

Well identification number
State well number
Location (decimal latitude and longitude, North American Datum (NAD) 83) Reference point elevation (feet, North American Vertical Datum (NAVD) 88) Land surface datum (feet, NAVD88)
Map and shapefile with monitoring locations, Bulletin 118 groundwater basin boundary, and boundary of monitoring area
Frequency and timing of measurements
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1111 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
17 FIELD METHODS
The consistent and documented collection of groundwater elevation data is important for ensuring that the data can be used across the state, regardless of the Monitoring Entity. The field methods should meet a common set of basic requirements; however, the methods do not have to be exactly the same. Many entities already have in place monitoring efforts that are successful in meeting local needs and that can meet the needs for this program, either as-is or with the incorporation of individual components.

The CASGEM program wishes to maintain, to the greatest extent possible, the procedures of high-quality local groundwater elevation monitoring programs, so long as they meet the overall program goals and policies. Of particular concern are the following basic requirements:

Method(s) to establish the Reference Point, including step-by-step instructions Method(s) to ensure static groundwater elevation
Method(s) to measure depth to water, including step-by-step instructions Method(s) and form(s) for recording measurements
It is the responsibility of each Monitoring Entity to develop and implement monitoring protocols that are appropriate to local groundwater basin conditions, protect the water quality of its monitoring wells, and maintain the quality of the data that it submits to the CASGEM Program. DWR has developed field guidelines (Department of Water Resources Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Guidelines) based on a review of existing field methods from DWR and other organizations, which is available on the CASGEM website. Monitoring Entities are welcome to refer to these guidelines when developing field methods for their own Monitoring Plans. However, the DWR guidelines are for internal use in the event that the Department is required to perform groundwater monitoring functions pursuant to Section 10933.5 and are not binding on any other agency. The core of the CASGEM program will rely and build on the many, established local long-term groundwater monitoring and management programs. The department will defer to existing monitoring programs that result in information that demonstrates seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations.

DATA REPORTING
DWR will develop an online data submittal system for Monitoring Entities to submit their groundwater elevation data. Several methods of submitting data will be available, such as direct online data entry, or upload of data files for batch entry. Initial groundwater elevation data should be submitted to DWR by January 1, 2012. Thereafter, data Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1112 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
18 should be submitted as soon as possible after collection, but no later than January 1st and July 1st of each year, at the minimum. Historical data can also be submitted via the DWR data system to aid in data interpretation. All submitted data will be available to the public, except for confidential data.

Each groundwater elevation data measurement submitted to the online system should include:

Well identification number
Measurement date
Reference point and land surface elevation
Depth to water
Method of measuring water depth
Measurement quality codes
The Monitoring Entity information, well information, and groundwater elevation information is to be provided by the Monitoring Entity. Items labeled as required must be submitted to DWR to report groundwater elevations. Items labeled as recommended should be submitted to DWR if they are available, as they assist in fully evaluating the quality of measurements. DWR will provide standard form(s) for Monitoring Entities to submit groundwater elevation data online. However, if Monitoring Entities cannot use the standard form(s) or provide the data elements listed below, DWR will work cooperatively with Monitoring Entities to develop alternate methods of submitting data.

Entity Information
All entities assuming groundwater monitoring functions as delineated in Section 10927 (a)-(f) are required to submit the following information:

Monitoring Entity's name, address, telephone number, contact person name and email address, and any other relevant contact information (Section 10928 (a) (1), 10928 (b) (1))
Name, address, telephone number, email address and any other relevant contact information for entities collecting data that is submitted by a designated submitting entity (Monitoring Entity)
Groundwater basins being monitored
o Identify entire basins monitored
o Identify partial basins monitored
Well Information
The following information about each well is required for the CASGEM online system:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1113 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
19 Unique well identification number. Agencies may use an existing State Well Number, an existing local well designation, or develop their own identification name, using the following protocol:
o Agency name, abbreviation, or acronym followed by a sequential number (e.g., SGA 01)
o Groundwater basin – followed by a sequential number (e.g., Llagas 03) o Geographic name – followed by a sequential number (e.g., Yolo 12) o Well names should be 15 characters long or less
o Avoid using owner/business names or specific locational information for privacy and security
Decimal latitude/longitude coordinates of well, using horizontal datum NAD83, and the method of determining coordinates (Actual coordinates are preferred; however, Monitoring Entities may submit approximate locations, as needed, to protect the privacy of well owners. For example, to protect the privacy of a well owner, a Monitoring Entity may submit well coordinate locations that are only within 1000-feet of the actual well location.)
Groundwater basin or sub-basin
Reference point elevation of the well (feet) using NAVD88 vertical datum Elevation of land surface datum at the well (feet) using NAVD88 vertical datum Use of well (e.g., dedicated monitoring, irrigation, domestic, etc) Well completion type (e.g. single well, nested, or multi-completion wells) Depth of screened interval(s) and total well depth of well, if available (feet) Well Completion Report number (DWR Form 188), if available The following information about each well is recommended for the CASGEM online system:

State Well Number – assigned by DWR in most cases
Method by which land surface elevation was determined (for example, topographic map, GPS, etc.)
Written description of location of well, including distance from nearby landmarks and location of reference point in relation to well appurtenances (DWR Form 429) Well information comments
Groundwater Elevation Information
The following information for each groundwater elevation measurement is required for the CASGEM online system:

Well identification number (see Well Information, above) Measurement date
Reference point elevation of the well (feet) using NAVD88 vertical datum Elevation of land surface datum at the well (feet) using NAVD88 vertical datum Depth to water below reference point (feet) (unless no measurement was taken) Method of measuring water depth
Measurement Quality Codes
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1114 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
20 o If no measurement is taken, a specified “no measurement” code, must be recorded. Standard codes will be provided by the online system. If a measurement is taken, a “no measurement” code is not recorded.) o If the quality of a measurement is uncertain, a “questionable measurement” code can be recorded. Standard codes will be provided by the online system. If no measurement is taken, a “questionable measurement” code is not recorded.)
Measuring agency identification
The following information for each groundwater elevation measurement is recommended for the CASGEM online system:

Measurement time (PST/PDT with military time/24 hour format) Comments about measurement, if applicable
Groundwater elevation data shall be submitted electronically to DWR’s online system.

DWR will develop electronic data transmittal (EDT) alternatives and data standards to permit bulk data transfer and assist Monitoring Entities in EDT reporting to DWR. As stated above, if Monitoring Entities cannot use the standard form(s) or provide the necessary groundwater elevation data elements, DWR will work cooperatively with Monitoring Entities to develop alternate methods of submitting data.

The CASGEM online data submittal system will be compatible with the Water Data Library (WDL) (http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary/), DWR’s existing groundwater elevation database. The CASGEM system will include data reporting options similar to those in WDL, such as hydrographs, seasonal contour data, and data downloads. The combined accessibility of the WDL and the CASGEM system will be a significant resource for local agencies in making sound groundwater management decisions.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1115 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
21 REFERENCES
California Departement of Water Resources. (2003). California's Groundwater, Bulletin 118-03.

California Department of Water Resources. (2009). California Water Plan Update 2009, Bulletin 160-09.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1116 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
22 APPENDIX – SENATE BILL 6 (7TH EXTRAORDINARY SESSION) -

GROUNDWATER MONITORING
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1117 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
23 Senate Bill No. 6
CHAPTER 1
An act to add Part 2.11 (commencing with Section 10920) to Division 6 of, and to repeal and add Section 12924 of, the Water Code, relating to groundwater. [Approved by Governor November 6, 2009. Filed with
Secretary of State November 6, 2009.]
Legislative Counsel’s Digest
SB 6, Steinberg. Groundwater.
(1) Existing law authorizes a local agency whose service area includes a groundwater basin that is not subject to groundwater management to adopt and implement a groundwater management plan pursuant to certain provisions of law. Existing law requires a groundwater management plan to include certain components to qualify as a plan for the purposes of those provisions, including a provision that establishes funding requirements for the construction of certain groundwater projects.

This bill would establish a groundwater monitoring program pursuant to which specified entities, in accordance with prescribed procedures, may propose to be designated by the Department of Water Resources as groundwater monitoring entities, as defined, for the purposes of monitoring and reporting with regard to groundwater elevations in all or part of a basin or subbasin, as defined. The bill would require the department to work cooperatively with each monitoring entity to determine the manner in which groundwater elevation information should be reported to the department. The bill would authorize the department to make recommendations for improving an existing monitoring program, and to require additional monitoring wells under certain circumstances. Under certain circumstances, the department would be required to perform groundwater monitoring functions. In that event, prescribed entities with authority to assume groundwater monitoring functions with regard to a basin or subbasin for which the department has assumed those functions would not be eligible for a water grant or loan awarded or administered by the state.
(2) Existing law requires the department to conduct an investigation of the state’s groundwater basins and to report its findings to the Governor and the Legislature not later than January 1, 1980.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1118 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
24 This bill would repeal that provision. The department would be required to conduct an investigation of the state’s groundwater basins and to report its findings to the Governor and the Legislature not later than January 1, 2012, and thereafter in years ending in 5 or

0. (3) The bill would take effect only if SB 1 and SB 7 of the 2009–10 7th Extraordinary Session of the Legislature are enacted and become effective.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. Part 2.11 (commencing with Section 10920) is added to Division 6 of the Water Code, to read:

PART 2.11. GROUNDWATER MONITORING
Chapter 1. General Provisions
10920. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature that on or before January 1, 2012, groundwater elevations in all groundwater basins and subbasins be regularly and systematically monitored locally and that the resulting groundwater information be made readily and widely available.
(b) It is further the intent of the Legislature that the department continue to maintain its current network of monitoring wells, including groundwater elevation and groundwater quality monitoring wells, and that the department continue to coordinate monitoring with local entities.
10921. This part does not require the monitoring of groundwater elevations in an area that is not within a basin or subbasin.
10922. This part does not expand or otherwise affect the powers or duties of the department relating to groundwater beyond those expressly granted by this part.

Chapter 2. Definitions
10925. Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions set forth in this section govern the construction of this part.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1119 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
25 (a) “Basin” or “subbasin” means a groundwater basin or subbasin identified and defined in the department’s Bulletin No. 118.
(b) “Bulletin No. 118” means the department’s report entitled “California’s Groundwater:

Bulletin 118” updated in 2003, or as it may be subsequently updated or revised in accordance with Section 12924.
(c) “Monitoring entity” means a party conducting or coordinating the monitoring of groundwater elevations pursuant to this part.
(d) “Monitoring functions” and “groundwater monitoring functions” means the monitoring of groundwater elevations, the reporting of those elevations to the department, and other related actions required by this part.
(e) “Monitoring groundwater elevations” means monitoring groundwater elevations, coordinating the monitoring of groundwater elevations, or both. (f) “Voluntary cooperative groundwater monitoring association” means an association formed for the purposes of monitoring groundwater elevations pursuant to Section 10935.

Chapter 3. Groundwater Monitoring Program
10927. Any of the following entities may assume responsibility for monitoring and reporting groundwater elevations in all or a part of a basin or subbasin in accordance with this part:
(a) A watermaster or water management engineer appointed by a court or pursuant to statute to administer a final judgment determining rights to groundwater. (b) (1) A groundwater management agency with statutory authority to manage groundwater pursuant to its principal act that is monitoring groundwater elevations in all or a part of a groundwater basin or subbasin on or before January 1, 2010. (2) A water replenishment district established pursuant to Division 18 (commencing with Section 60000). This part does not expand or otherwise affect the authority of a water replenishment district relating to monitoring groundwater elevations. (c) A local agency that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin or subbasin pursuant to Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750) and that was monitoring Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1120 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
26 groundwater elevations in all or a part of a groundwater basin or subbasin on or before January 1, 2010, or a local agency or county that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin or subbasin pursuant to any other legally enforceable groundwater management plan with provisions that are substantively similar to those described in that part and that was monitoring groundwater elevations in all or a part of a groundwater basin or subbasin on or before January 1, 2010. (d) A local agency that is managing all or part of a groundwater basin or subbasin pursuant to an integrated regional water management plan prepared pursuant to Part

2.2 (commencing with Section 10530) that includes a groundwater management component that complies with the requirements of Section 10753.7. (e) A county that is not managing all or a part of a groundwater basin or subbasin pursuant to a legally enforceable groundwater management plan with provisions that are substantively similar to those described in Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750).
(f) A voluntary cooperative groundwater monitoring association formed pursuant to Section 10935.
10928. (a) Any entity described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 10927 that seeks to assume groundwater monitoring functions in accordance with this part shall notify the department, in writing, on or before January 1, 2011. The notification shall include all of the following information:
(1) The entity’s name, address, telephone number, and any other relevant contact information.
(2) The specific authority described in Section 10927 pursuant to which the entity qualifies to assume the groundwater monitoring functions. (3) A map showing the area for which the entity is requesting to perform the groundwater monitoring functions.
(4) A statement that the entity will comply with all of the requirements of this part. (b) Any entity described in subdivision (c), (d), (e), or (f) of Section 10927 that seeks to assume groundwater monitoring functions in accordance with this part shall notify the department, in writing, by January 1, 2011. The information provided in the notification shall include all of the following:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1121 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
27 (1) The entity’s name, address, telephone number, and any other relevant contact information.
(2) The specific authority described in Section 10927 pursuant to which the entity qualifies to assume the groundwater monitoring functions. (3) For entities that seek to qualify pursuant to subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 10927, the notification shall also include a copy of the current groundwater management plan or the groundwater component of the integrated regional water management plan, as appropriate.
(4) For entities that seek to qualify pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 10927, the notification shall include a statement of intention to meet the requirements of Section 10935.
(5) A map showing the area for which the entity is proposing to perform the groundwater monitoring functions.
(6) A statement that the entity will comply with all of the requirements of this part. (7) A statement describing the ability and qualifications of the entity to conduct the groundwater monitoring functions required by this part. (c) The department may request additional information that it deems necessary for the purposes of determining the area that is proposed to be monitored or the qualifications of the entity to perform the groundwater monitoring functions. 10929. (a) (1) The department shall review all notifications received pursuant to Section 10928.
(2) Upon the receipt of a notification pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 10928, the department shall verify that the notifying entity has the appropriate authority under subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 10927.
(3) Upon the receipt of a notification pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 10928, the department shall do both of the following:
(A) Verify that each notification is complete.
(B) Assess the qualifications of the notifying party.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1122 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
28 (b) If the department has questions about the completeness or accuracy of a notification, or the qualifications of a party, the department shall contact the party to resolve any deficiencies. If the department is unable to resolve the deficiencies, the department shall notify the party in writing that the notification will not be considered further until the deficiencies are corrected.
(c) If the department determines that more than one party seeks to become the monitoring entity for the same portion of a basin or subbasin, the department shall consult with the interested parties to determine which party will perform the monitoring functions. In determining which party will perform the monitoring functions under this part, the department shall follow the order in which entities are identified in Section 10927.
(d) The department shall advise each party on the status of its notification within three months of receiving the notification.
10930. Upon completion of each review pursuant to Section 10929, the department shall do both of the following if it determines that a party will perform monitoring functions under this part:
(a) Notify the party in writing that it is a monitoring entity and the specific portion of the basin or subbasin for which it shall assume groundwater monitoring functions. (b) Post on the department’s Internet Web site information that identifies the monitoring entity and the portion of the basin or subbasin for which the monitoring entity will be responsible.
10931. (a) The department shall work cooperatively with each monitoring entity to determine the manner in which groundwater elevation information should be reported to the department pursuant to this part. In determining what information should be reported to the department, the department shall defer to existing monitoring programs if those programs result in information that demonstrates seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations. The department shall collaborate with the State Department of Public Health to ensure that the information reported to the department will not result in the inappropriate disclosure of the physical address or geographical location of drinking water sources, storage facilities, pumping operational data, or treatment facilities.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1123 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
29 (b) (1) For the purposes of this part, the department may recommend improvements to an existing monitoring program, including recommendations for additional monitoring wells.
(2) The department may not require additional monitoring wells unless funds are provided for that purpose.
10932. Monitoring entities shall commence monitoring and reporting groundwater elevations pursuant to this part on or before January 1, 2012. 10933. (a) On or before January 1, 2012, the department shall commence to identify the extent of monitoring of groundwater elevations that is being undertaken within each basin and subbasin.
(b) The department shall prioritize groundwater basins and subbasins for the purpose of implementing this section. In prioritizing the basins and subbasins, the department shall, to the extent data are available, consider all of the following:
(1) The population overlying the basin or subbasin.
(2) The rate of current and projected growth of the population overlying the basin or subbasin.
(3) The number of public supply wells that draw from the basin or subbasin. (4) The total number of wells that draw from the basin or subbasin. (5) The irrigated acreage overlying the basin or subbasin. (6) The degree to which persons overlying the basin or subbasin rely on groundwater as their primary source of water.
(7) Any documented impacts on the groundwater within the basin or subbasin, including overdraft, subsidence, saline intrusion, and other water quality degradation. (8) Any other information determined to be relevant by the department. (c) If the department determines that all or part of a basin or subbasin is not being monitored pursuant to this part, the department shall do all of the following:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1124 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
30 (1) Attempt to contact all well owners within the area not being monitored. (2) Determine if there is an interest in establishing any of the following:
(A) A groundwater management plan pursuant to Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750).
(B) An integrated regional water management plan pursuant to Part 2.2 (commencing with Section 10530) that includes a groundwater management component that complies with the requirements of Section 10753.7.
(C) A voluntary groundwater monitoring association pursuant to Section 10935. (d) If the department determines that there is sufficient interest in establishing a plan or association described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c), or if the county agrees to perform the groundwater monitoring functions in accordance with this part, the department shall work cooperatively with the interested parties to comply with the requirements of this part within two years.
(e) If the department determines, with regard to a basin or subbasin, that there is insufficient interest in establishing a plan or association described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c), and if the county decides not to perform the groundwater monitoring and reporting functions of this part, the department shall do all of the following:
(1) Identify any existing monitoring wells that overlie the basin or subbasin that are owned or operated by the department or any other state or federal agency. (2) Determine whether the monitoring wells identified pursuant to paragraph (1) provide sufficient information to demonstrate seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations.
(3) If the department determines that the monitoring wells identified pursuant to paragraph (1) provide sufficient information to demonstrate seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations, the department shall not perform groundwater monitoring functions pursuant to Section 10934.
(4) If the department determines that the monitoring wells identified pursuant to paragraph (1) provide insufficient information to demonstrate seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations, and the State Mining and Geology Board concurs with Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1125 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
31 that determination, the department shall perform groundwater monitoring functions pursuant to Section 10934.1
10933.5. (a) Consistent with Section 10933, the department shall perform the groundwater monitoring functions for those portions of a basin or subbasin for which no monitoring entity has agreed to perform the groundwater monitoring functions. (b) Upon determining that it is required to perform groundwater monitoring functions, the department shall notify both of the following entities that it is forming the groundwater monitoring district:
(1) Each well owner within the affected area.
(2) Each county that contains all or a part of the affected area. (c) The department shall not assess a fee or charge to recover the costs for carrying out its power and duties under this part.
(d) The department may establish regulations to implement this section. 10933.7. (a) If the department is required to perform groundwater monitoring functions pursuant to Section 10933.5, the county and the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, of Section 10927 shall not be eligible for a water grant or loan awarded or administered by the state.
(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the department shall determine that an entity described in subdivision (a) is eligible for a water grant or loan under the circumstances described in subdivision (a) if the entity has submitted to the department for approval documentation demonstrating that its entire service area qualifies as a disadvantaged community.
10934. (a) For purposes of this part, neither any entity described in Section 10927, nor the department, shall have the authority to do either of the following:
(1) To enter private property without the consent of the property owner.

1 The reference in Section 10933(e)(4) to Section 10934 has been amended by Stats. 2010, Ch. 328, sec. 237 (S.B. 1330). The new reference will be to Section 10933.5.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1126 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
32 (2) To require a private property owner to submit groundwater monitoring information to the entity.
(b) This section does not apply to a county or an entity described in subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, of Section 10927 that assumed responsibility for monitoring and reporting groundwater elevations prior to the effective date of this part. 10935. (a) A voluntary cooperative groundwater monitoring association may be formed for the purposes of monitoring groundwater elevations in accordance with this part. The association may be established by contract, a joint powers agreement, a memorandum of agreement, or other form of agreement deemed acceptable by the department. (b) Upon notification to the department by one or more entities that seek to form a voluntary cooperative groundwater monitoring association, the department shall work cooperatively with the interested parties to facilitate the formation of the association. (c) The contract or agreement shall include all of the following:
(1) The names of the participants.
(2) The boundaries of the area covered by the agreement. (3) The name or names of the parties responsible for meeting the requirements of this part.
(4) The method of recovering the costs associated with meeting the requirements of this part.
(5) Other provisions that may be required by the department. 10936. Costs incurred by the department pursuant to this chapter may be funded from unallocated bond revenues pursuant to paragraph (12) of subdivision (a) of Section 75027 of the Public Resources Code, to the extent those funds are available for those purposes.

SEC. 2. Section 12924 of the Water Code is repealed.

SEC. 3. Section 12924 is added to the Water Code, to read:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1127 of 1274 CASGEM Procedures for Monitoring Entity Reporting
33 12924. (a) The department, in conjunction with other public agencies, shall conduct an investigation of the state’s groundwater basins. The department shall identify the state’s groundwater basins on the basis of geological and hydrological conditions and consideration of political boundary lines whenever practical. The department shall also investigate existing general patterns of groundwater pumping and groundwater recharge within those basins to the extent necessary to identify basins that are subject to critical conditions of overdraft.
(b) The department shall report its findings to the Governor and the Legislature not later than January 1, 2012, and thereafter in years ending in 5 or 0.

SEC. 4. This act shall take effect only if Senate Bill 1 and Senate Bill 7 of the 2009–10 Seventh Extraordinary Session of the Legislature are enacted and become effective.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1128 of 1274 City Council/Financing Authority Meeting I. 6.

DATE: 01/18/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve an agreement with Aero Tech Surveys to provide aerial mapping and land surveying services for the California Street Landfill in an amount not-to-exceed $39,000 for the initial term of one year, with the option to extend by two additional one-year terms for a total amount not-to-exceed $117,000.00; and determine that the project is not subject to environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Assistant City Manager Boatman) MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

I move that the City Council determine that the agreement with Aero Tech Surveys is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Act; and

1. I move that the City Council approve an agreement with Aero Tech Surveys to provide aerial mapping and land surveying services for the California Street Landfill in an amount not-to-exceed $39,000 for the initial term of one year, with the option to extend by two additional one-year terms for a total amount not-to-exceed $117,000.00

2. RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the agreement with Aero Tech Surveys to provide aerial mapping and land surveying services for the California Street Landfill in an amount not-to-exceed $39,000 for the initial term of one year, with the option to extend by two additional one-year terms for a total amount not-to-exceed $117,000.00.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1129 of 1274 DISCUSSION:

The California Street Landfill is required by Federal, State, and County agencies to remain in compliance with regulatory requirements associated with the daily operations, monitoring and adjustments, topographic maps, slope analysis, drainage diagrams, and volumetric calculations of the Landfill. This includes regular field mapping and surveying to ensure an accurate understanding of airspace utilization and to maintain water quality compliance specific to the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board standards.

In accordance with the City’s procurement guidelines, a formal Request for Proposals (RFP) was advertised on October 21, 2021, for aerial mapping and land surveying services. The RFP evaluated the capacity and qualification of firms to provide services and their experience to provide the required services.

A total of two (2) responses were received from the following firms:

1. Aero Tech Surveys

2. ERSC Engineering
Staff evaluated the proposals for conformance with the scope of services and qualifications in accordance with Chapter 2.16.180 of the Redlands Municipal Code. Staff confirmed that Aero Tech Surveys met the City’s requirements and is the most highly qualified firm, based on the response to the scope of work provided in the RFP.

Staff is recommending that the City Council approve an agreement with Aero Tech Surveys in the amount of $39,000.00 for a period of one year, with two additional one-year renewal options for a total agreement amount not-to-exceed $117,000.00.

This proposed agreement is categorically exempt from environmental review in accordance with Section 15301 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act as the agreement pertains to the maintenance of existing public facilities involving no expansion to current uses.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may elect to direct staff to reject all proposals and re-issue the proposal.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Supports Focus area C - Infrastructure
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1130 of 1274 SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Daniel J. McHugh, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
Dana Abramovitz-Daniel, Procurement Manager
PREPARED BY:

Nathalie Ayala, Senior Administrative Assistant
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2021-22
Revenue Generating: Yes
Appropriation Required Y/N: No
Amount: $39,000
Budgeted Y/N: Yes
Account No.: 511900
Discussion:

Sufficient funding for this service is included in the Solid Waste Division's (511900) budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as approved by City Council. Costs associated with any future renewal terms of the agreement will be included in subsequent budget requests prepared by the Department.

Attachments
A. Agreement with Aero Tech Surveys
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1131 of 1274

AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This agreement for the provision of aerial mapping and land surveying services for the California Street Landfill (“Agreement”) is made and entered in this 18th day of January, 2022 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Aero Tech Services, a California corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as a “Party” and, together, as the “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1 – ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT

1.1 City hereby engages Consultant to provide aerial mapping and land surveying for City’s California Street Landfill (the “Services”).

1.2 The Services shall be performed by Consultant in a professional manner, and Consultant represents that it has the skill and the professional expertise necessary to provide the Services to City at a level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professional consultants in the industry providing like and similar types of Services.

ARTICLE 2 – SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

2.1 The Services that Consultant shall perform are more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” titled “Scope of Services,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

2.2 Consultant shall comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations in the performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to, any applicable State prevailing wage laws.

ARTICLE 3 – RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY

3.1 City designates Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager, as City’s representative with respect to performance of the Services, and such person shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to performance of the Services.

ARTICLE 4 – PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES

4.1 Consultant shall perform and complete the Services in a prompt and diligent manner in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit “A,” titled “Scope of Services,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

4.2 The Term of this Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year from the Effective Date of this Agreement (the “Initial Term”). The City shall have the option to extend the Initial Term of this Agreement by two (2) additional one-year terms (each, an “Extended Term”), on the same terms and conditions, by providing written notice to Consultant at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any Extended Term.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1132 of 1274 The Initial Term and any Extended Terms are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Term” of this Agreement.

4.3 If Consultant’s Services include deliverable electronic visual presentation materials, such materials shall be delivered in a form, and made available to City, consistent with City Council-adopted policy for the same. It shall be the obligation of Consultant to obtain a copy of such policy from City staff.

ARTICLE 5 – PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT

5.1 The total annual compensation for Consultant’s performance of the Services shall not exceed the amount of thirty nine thousand dollars ($39,000) for the Services provided during the Initial Term. Should this Agreement be extended, the compensation for Consultant’s performance for the Services shall not exceed the amount of thirty nine thousand dollars ($39,000) for the first Extended Term; and thirty nine thousand dollars ($39,000) for the second Extended Term, bringing the total possible amount of compensation to a not-to-exceed amount of one hundred seventeen thousand dollars ($117,000). City shall pay Consultant on a time and materials basis up to the not to exceed amount in accordance with Exhibit “B,” titled “Schedule of Fees,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

5.2 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City describing the Services performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s invoices shall include a brief description of the Services performed, the dates the Services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of reimbursable expenses related to the Services. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) days after receipt and approval by City of Consultant’s invoice.

5.3 Any notice or other communication required, or which may be given, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in writing. Any such notice shall be deemed delivered (i) on the date of delivery in person; (ii) five (5) days after deposit in first class registered mail, with return receipt requested; (iii) on the actual delivery date if deposited with an overnight courier; or (iv) on the date sent by facsimile or electronic mail transmission (including PDF), if confirmed with a copy sent contemporaneously by first class, certified, registered or express mail; in each case properly posted and fully prepaid to the appropriate address set forth below, or such other address as a Party may provide notice in accordance with this section:

CITY: CONSULTANT:

City Clerk Janine C. Schmidt, President
City of Redlands Aero Tech Surveys
35 Cajon Street 6810 Airport Dr.

P.O. Box 3005 (mailing) Riverside, CA 92504
Redlands, CA 92373 [email protected]
[email protected] Phone: (909) 785-0160
Phone: (909) 798-7531
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1133 of 1274 ARTICLE 6 – INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

6.1 The following insurance coverage required by this Agreement shall be maintained by Consultant for the duration of its performance of the Services. Consultant shall not perform any Services unless and until the required insurance listed below is obtained by Consultant. Consultant shall provide City with certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing such insurance prior to commencement of the Services. Insurance policies shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation or modification of the policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City.

A. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance in the amount that meets statutory requirements with an insurance carrier acceptable to City, or certification to City that Consultant is self-insured or exempt from the workers’ compensation laws of the State of California. Consultant shall execute and provide City with Exhibit “C,” titled “Workers’ Compensation Insurance Certification,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, prior to performance of the Services.

B. Comprehensive General Liability insurance with carriers acceptable to City in the minimum amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate, for public liability, property damage and personal injury is required. City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non-contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City.

C. Consultant shall secure and maintain professional liability insurance throughout the term of this Agreement in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim made.

D. Business Auto Liability coverage, with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability. This coverage shall include all Consultant owned vehicles used in connection with Consultant’s provision of the Services, hired and non-owned vehicles, and employee non-ownership vehicles. City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non-contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City.

E. Consultant is expressly prohibited from assigning or subcontracting any of the Services without the prior written consent of City. In the event of mutual agreement by the Parties to assign or subcontract a portion of the Services, Consultant shall add such assignee or subcontractor as an additional insured to the insurance policies required hereby and provide City with the insurance endorsements prior to any Services being performed by the assignee or subcontractor.

6.2 Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorneys’ fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1134 of 1274 occasioned by any negligent act or omission by, or the willful misconduct of, Consultant, or its officers, employees and agents in performing the Services.

ARTICLE 7 – CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

7.1 Consultant covenants and represents that it does not have any investment or interest in any real property that may be the subject of this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment that would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s Services. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder, no person having any such interest shall perform any Services under this Agreement.

7.2 Consultant agrees it is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:

A. Does not make a governmental decision whether to:
(i) approve a rate, rule or regulation, or adopt or enforce a City law; (ii) issue, deny, suspend or revoke any City permit, license, application, certification, approval, order or similar authorization or entitlement; (iii) authorize City to enter into, modify or renew a contract; (iv) grant City approval to a contract that requires City approval and to which City is a party, or to the specifications for such a contract; (v) grant City approval to a plan, design, report, study or similar item; (vi) adopt, or grant City approval of, policies, standards or guidelines for City or for any subdivision thereof.

B. Does not serve in a staff capacity with City and in that capacity, participate in making a governmental decision or otherwise perform the same or substantially the same duties for City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position specified in City’s Conflict of Interest Code under Government Code section 87302.

7.3 In the event City determines that Consultant must disclose its financial interests, Consultant shall complete and file a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests, with the City Clerk’s office pursuant to the written instructions provided by the City Clerk.

ARTICLE 8 – GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

8.1 In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement the prevailing Party shall, in addition to any costs and other relief, be entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorneys’ fees, including fees for the use of in-house counsel by a Party.

8.2 Consultant shall not assign any of the Services, except with the prior written approval of City and in strict compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Any Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1135 of 1274 assignment or attempted assignment without such prior written consent may, in the sole discretion of City, result in City’s immediate termination of this Agreement.

8.3 Consultant is for all purposes under this Agreement an independent contractor and shall perform the Services as an independent contractor. Neither City nor any its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or Consultant’s employees, except as herein set forth. Consultant shall supply all necessary tools and instrumentalities required to perform the Services. Assigned personnel employed by Consultant are for its account only, and in no event shall Consultant or personnel retained by it be deemed to have been employed by City or engaged by City for the account of, or on behalf of City. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, nor shall Consultant have any authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation.

8.4 This Agreement may be terminated by City, in its sole discretion, by providing not less than five (5) days prior written notice to Consultant of City’s intent to terminate. If this Agreement is terminated by City, an adjustment to Consultant’s compensation shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit or unperformed Services, and (2) any payment due Consultant at the time of termination may be adjusted to the extent of any additional costs to City occasioned by any default by Consultant. Upon receipt of a termination notice, Consultant shall immediately discontinue its provision of the Services and, within five (5) days of the date of the termination notice, deliver or otherwise make available to City, copies (in both hard copy and electronic form, where applicable) of project related data, design calculations, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by Consultant in performing the Services. Consultant shall be compensated on a pro-rata basis for Services completed up to the date of termination.

8.5 Consultant shall maintain books, ledgers, invoices, accounts and other records and documents evidencing costs and expenses related to the Services for a period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Such books shall be available at reasonable times for examination by City at the office of Consultant.

8.6 This Agreement, including the Exhibits incorporated herein by reference, represents the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties as to the matters contained herein, and any prior negotiations, written proposals or verbal agreements relating to such matters are superseded by this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided for herein, any amendment to this Agreement shall be in writing, approved by City and signed by City and Consultant.

8.7 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflicts of laws provisions. The Parties agree that all actions or proceedings arising in connection with this Agreement shall be tried and litigated only in the state courts located in San Bernardino County, California, and the federal courts located in Riverside County, California.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1136 of 1274

8.8 If one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained in this Agreement is declared invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Agreement and shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained herein, unless to do so would deprive a Party of a material benefit of its bargain under this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of City and Consultant have signed in confirmation of this Agreement.

CITY OF REDLANDS AERO TECH SURVEYS
By: ___________________________ By: _________________________ Paul T. Barich, Mayor Janine C. Schmidt, President
ATTEST:
___________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1137 of 1274 EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Scope of Work
Provide, on an as-needed basis, the following services:
• Conduct field surveys and research
• Perform staking of lot lines / pre-set field measurements • Create lot line adjustments
• Create legal descriptions
• Produce various exhibits, maps, figures as needed
• Combine surfaces and varied data to produce layered exhibits • Perform topographic / aerial cartography to produce volumes • Produce volumetric calculations, including rate-of-fill, ultimate fill levels, capacity levels • Prepare aerial photo mission flight maps
• Plan aerial control networks
• Set and survey aerial control marks
• Acquire aerial photography
• Provide analytical triangulation (AT)
• Compile and build 3-D models of planimetric and terrain features • Present the digital topographic map model in a variety of CAD platforms • Utilize client standards when possible
• Create Digital Ortho Photos
• Assemble Photo Mosaics
• Prepare slope analysis diagrams
• Calculate Volumes between terrain surfaces
• Calculate estimated lifespan
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1138 of 1274 EXHIBIT "B"

FEE SCHEDULE
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1139 of 1274 EXHIBIT "C"
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:
(a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this State. (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employer, or as one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.

CHECK ONE
_____I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake selfinsurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement. (Labor Code §1861).
_____I affirm that at all times, in performing the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California. However, at any time, if I employ any person such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California, immediately I shall provide the City with a certificate of consent to self-insure, or a certification of workers’ compensation insurance.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made in this certificate are true and correct.

AERO TECH SURVEYS

By: Date: ___________________
Janine C. Schmidt, President
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1140 of 1274 City Council/Financing Authority Meeting I. 7.

DATE: 01/18/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve a Sole Source purchase order with Nextech Systems, Inc. in an amount not-to-exceed $48,500.81 for Traffic Signal Cabinet Battery Backup Systems; and determine that the purchase is not subject to environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Assistant City Manager Chris Boatman)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

I move that the City Council determine that approval of the purchase order is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Act; and

1. I move that the City Council approve a purchase order with NexTech Systems, Inc. for the provision of traffic signal cabinet battery backup systems in an amount not to exceed $48,500.81.

2. RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council determine that the purchase with NexTech Systems, Inc., is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Act; and award a sole source purchase order to NexTech Systems, Inc., for the provision of traffic signal cabinet battery backup systems in an amount not-to-exceed $48,500.81.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1141 of 1274 DISCUSSION:

The Redlands Passenger Rail (Arrow) project involves extending passenger rail service approximately nine miles from San Bernardino Transit Center in the City of San Bernardino to the University of Redlands. The rail intersects multiple City streets and affects certain signalized intersections. Although signals have been upgraded for the rail line, the new systems still rely on the existing battery backup systems contained in the decommissioned cabinets. However, the current backup systems at these intersections are outdated and need replacement.

Uninterruptible Power Supplies are used at each of the City's signaled intersections and are activated in the event of a power failure to supply individual traffic signals with emergency power. The City of Redlands traffic signal specifications specifically call for the use of Clary UPS battery packs.

Nextech Systems, Inc. is the authorized regional distributor of Clary UPS battery backup systems. To ensure public safety at each active rail crossing, staff recommends City Council award a sole source purchase order to NexTech Systems, Inc., for the provision of traffic signal cabinet battery backup systems in an amount not-to-exceed $48,500.81.

The proposed purchase is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act's guidelines pursuant to Section 15301 as the proposed improvements do not increase the existing operational capacity or expand the use of traffic signals, enabling a categorical exemption from CEQA under section 15301 for Existing Facilities.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council may elect not to enter into a Sole Source agreement with Nextech Systems, Inc. and provide alternative direction to staff.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Focus Area-E: Safety and Community Services
SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1142 of 1274 REVIEWED BY:

Daniel J. McHugh, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Mike Foster, Field Services Coordinator-Streets Division Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: F2021-2022
Appropriation Required Y/N: N
Amount: 48,500.81
Budgeted Y/N: Y
Account No.: 101302
Discussion:

Sufficient funding for the UPS units is included in the Electrical Maintenance Division's (101302) budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as approved by City Council.

Attachments
A. Sole-Single Source Request Form
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1143 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1144 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1145 of 1274 Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1146 of 1274 City Council/Financing Authority Meeting I. 8.

DATE: 01/18/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve request for the consumption of alcoholic beverages at Smiley Park at the Watchorn Lincoln Dinner to be held on February 12, 2022, and determination that the approval of the request is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the state’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Assistant City Manager Boatman)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

I move that the City Council determine that approval of the request for the consumption of alcoholic beverages within a City park during the Watchorn Lincoln Dinner is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and

1. I move to approve the request for the consumption of alcoholic beverages at Smiley Park during the Lincoln Dinner to be held on February 12, 2022.

2. RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council determine that approval of the request for the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages at Smiley Park during Watchorn Lincoln Dinner is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the state’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and provide staff with the direction regarding the request for the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1147 of 1274 DISCUSSION:

The A.K. Smiley Public Library will host the Annual Watchorn Lincoln Dinner on February 12, 2022. The A.K. Smiley Public Library is requesting permission to serve beer and wine as a courtesy to the dinner guests. Serving and selling alcohol at the event is scheduled to end no later than 9:00 p.m. The Redlands Municipal Code includes provisions that allow for the reservation of public areas by private parties. Staff’s approval authority for the consumption of alcoholic beverages is limited to only enclosed public spaces in public parks as defined by Resolution No. 7559. Therefore, City Council approval is required for the request for the sale and consumption of alcohol.

The applicant is required to comply with any conditions set by the Police Department. In addition, they may be required to provide the City with certificates for public liability insurance to protect against loss from liability for damages on account of bodily injury and property damage arising from the Applicant’s activity. Such insurance shall include not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate of comprehensive general liability insurance, including bodily injury and property damage coverage, together with such other additional coverage as the City’s Risk Manager may determine to be prudent. Insurance coverage shall be obtained before the event and maintained for the duration of the Applicant’s activity.

Approval of the request is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act’s guidelines pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). Section 15061(b)(3), referred to as the “general rule,” applies to those activities where it is seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. Approval of the project authorizes the consumption of alcoholic beverages within the City’s right-of-way and will not result in any physical change to the environment.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may deny the request.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Objective B-2: Tourism: Increase tourism by marketing Redlands as a destination.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1148 of 1274 SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Daniel J. McHugh, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
Christopher R. Catren, Police Chief
PREPARED BY:

Larry Alms, Administrative Assistant
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2021-22
Discussion:

There is no fiscal impact related to the approval of the request to serve alcohol.

Attachments
A. Authorization to Serve Alcohol
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1149 of 1274

CITY OF REDLANDS

APPLICATION REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO SERVE ALCOHOL
TYPE/NAME OF EVENT: ___________________________________________________________________________ DATE OF EVENT: ______________________________ HOURS: ____________________________ LOCATION: ___________________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S INFORMATION:

INDIVIDUAL/ORGANIZATION NAME:__________________________________________________________________ CONTACT PERSON: ________________________________________ PHONE: ______________________________ EMAIL: ______________________________________ ADDRESS:________________________________________ EVENT INFORMATION:

ARE FEES BEING CHARGED FOR EVENT? YES NO PRICE: __________________ ARE FEES BEING CHARGED FOR ALCOHOL? YES NO PRICE:_______________ TYPE OF ALCOHOL BEING SERVED: BEER WINE DISTILLED SPIRITS

RELEASE, HOLD HARMLESS AND AGREEMENT NOT TO SUE
I, the undersigned, representing _______________________________________ and in consideration of being permitted to conduct the Event, agree that the members/participants of ___________________________________________ shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Redlands, its elected officials, officers, boards, commissions, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, damages, liabilities and judgments of every kind and nature and regardless of the merit of the same, arising out of the use of City of Redlands’ facilities.

The members/participants of __________________________________________ hereby release, discharge and agree not to sue the City of Redlands for any injury, death or damages to or loss of property arising out of or in connection with this event from whatever cause.

I HAVE CAREFULLY READ THIS RELEASE, HOLD HARMLESS AND AGREEMENT NOT TO USE AND FULLY UNDERSTAND ITS CONTENTS. I

REPRESENT I HAVE THE FULL AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS FULL RELEASE OF LIABILITY ON BEHALF OF THE MEMBERS/PARTICIPANTS OF _______________________________________________________________AND THAT I HAVE SIGNED THIS AGREEMENT ON:

Date: ______________ Signature: _______________________________________________

AUTHORIZATION
Pursuant to the use of alcohol within the City property noted above, the City of Redlands grants you permission to do so with the following conditions set forth by the City Council:

ALCOHOL RELATED TO PARKS:

Redlands Municipal; Code, Section 12.44.270 does allow, pursuant to a written permit from the Quality of Life Director, a person or persons to drink or consume alcoholic beverages in public parks, only in enclosed public areas as defined by resolution of the City Council. Any other locations within the City’s property requires the City Council approval and designation of the place for the sale and consumption thereof.

Tape or fencing of some kind shall be used for setting off the area for which the alcoholic beverages are served and consumed. Alcohol sales and distribution shall cease one hour prior to end of the event unless otherwise directed by RPD or ABC office.

ALCOHOL RELATED TO AIRPORT:

12.56.090: USE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR DRUGS: No person shall operate or assist in the operation of any aircraft while under the influence of, or using, any intoxicating liquor or habit forming or hallucinatory or narcotic drug. No alcoholic beverage may be consumed or sold on the airport unless the city council shall have approved and designated the place for the sale and consumption thereof.

APPROVED: __________________________ DATE: _______ DENIED: _______________________ DATE: ______ CITY COUNCIL DATE (if applicable):_______________
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1150 of 1274 City Council/Financing Authority Meeting I. 9.

DATE: 01/18/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Authorize the acceptance of the California Market Match Program Grant through the Ecology Center in the amount of $4,260 and approve an additional appropriation of the same (Assistant City Manager Boatman)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

I move that the City Council accept the California Market Match Program Grant through the Ecology Center in the amount of $4,260; and

1. 2. I move to approve the additional appropriation of the same.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council accept the California Market Match Program Grant through the Ecology Center in the amount of $4,260, and approve an additional appropriation of the same.

DISCUSSION:

The Federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), called CalFresh in California and occasionally referred to as "food stamps," is the largest food assistance program in the nation. Market Match is California’s SNAP healthy food incentive program which matches customers’ nutrition assistance benefits, like CalFresh and WIC, at farmers’ markets. The matching funds allow SNAP recipients to buy more fruits and vegetables from eligible farmers' markets such as the Redlands Certified Farmers Markets. Market Match empowers qualifying shoppers to make healthy food choices by overcoming financial barriers. The intent of the grant is to encourage job creation, local economic development, and civic engagement by leveraging the benefits of farmers’ markets for a broader community.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1151 of 1274 From 2017 through 2021, the City Council has approved the acceptance of Market Match grant funds for use at the City's Certified Farmers Markets. The Saturday Morning Certified Farmers Market has continued in operation as an essential service throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. The program has been an extraordinary success, with a cumulative 700 participants who have used the program with $9,000 in incentives provided for the purchase of locally grown fresh fruits and vegetables. If approved, the grant funds for the fifth year will be dedicated to continuing the Market Match incentive program, including advertising for customer outreach, incentives distributed to participants, and program administration for data tracking and distribution of incentives at the market.

The City has been awarded the California Market Match Program Grant through the Ecology Center in the amount of $4,260. An in-kind requirement in the amount of $7,444.17 will be fulfilled through staff time administering the grant and existing staff time distributing funds at the City's markets. The term of this grant is from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council may elect not to receive the California Market Match Program Grant award at this time.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Supports Objective B-2: Increase tourism by marketing Redlands as a destination and expand/enhance Downtown area and related events.

Supports Focus Area E: Safety and Community Services.

SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan, Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Daniel J. McHugh, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1152 of 1274 PREPARED BY:

Dave Jaffe, Recreation Supervisor
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2021-22
Appropriation Required Y/N: Y
Amount: $4,260.00
Account No.: 200300
Discussion:

The grant will provide total funds in the amount of $4,260.00. Of this total, $510.00 will be used towards promoting and administering the program and $3,750.00 will be used towards incentives. The City is required to provide a match of $7,444.17 in in-kind services.

Attachments
Ecology Center Agreement
Additional Appropriation Form
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1153 of 1274

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by the Ecology Center, a nonprofit public benefit corporation organized under the laws of the State of California with offices at 2530 San Pablo Avenue, Berkeley, California, 94702 and City of Redlands with offices at _______________________________________________________________________ (hereafter "Contractor," and together with the Ecology Center, the "Parties"). The Ecology Center enters into this Agreement to carry out a portion of its California Nutrition Incentive Program (“CNIP”) Grant Agreement with the California Department of Food and Agriculture- (“CDFA”) grant contract number 19-0807-001-SF.

WHEREAS, Contractor has the required capacity to provide the services sought by the Ecology Center; and
WHEREAS, Ecology Center wishes to utilize Contractor's services and abilities during the term of this Agreement, and Contractor is willing to offer such services upon the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Term, Engagement, and Services. This Agreement is effective as of January 1, 2022 and terminates on December 31, 2022 unless terminated earlier as provided herein. During the term of this Agreement, the Ecology Center hereby engages Contractor and Contractor hereby agrees to serve the Ecology Center, as an independent contractor and not as an employee or agent of the Ecology Center. Contractor shall be available to work for reasonable periods of time to perform the scope of services and provide deliverables according to the budget and schedule as set forth in Attachment A: Budget, Attachment B: Scope of Work, and Attachment C: Debarment Certification Form (the "Services"), included with and hereby made a part of this agreement. Either party to this Agreement may terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, by giving the other party thirty (30) days written notice. Should Contractor default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its terms, the Ecology Center at its option, may terminate this Agreement effective immediately upon giving written notice to Contractor stating the reason for the termination of this Agreement.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1154 of 1274 Contractor’s original grant proposal and any revisions thereto, including all supplemental documentation provided by contractor to document grant deliverables, match, and incentives to be distributed, is incorporated by reference as a part of this agreement.

2. Compliance with Terms of the Ecology Center Grant CDFA Agreement 19-0807-001-SF. Contractor agrees to comply with all terms and conditions applicable to the Ecology Center’s Grant Agreement with CDFA19-0807-001- SF. Contractor also agrees to comply with all applicable Federal and State regulations, including but not limited to, the Code of Federal Regulations (2CFR 230, 2CFR 200), Research Terms and Conditions (06/11) and NIFA Agency Specific Terms and Conditions (10/14) at
http://www.nifa.usda.gov/business/awards/awardterms.html; General Provisions found in Title 2: 2CFR Part 400; 2 CFR Part 415; 2 CFR Part 416; 2 CFR Part 418; 2 CFR Part 422; 7 CFR 3015, 3016, 3019, Title 7: 7 CFR Part 3430, and allowable cost principles found in 2 CFR 220, 225, and 230 or Federal Acquisition Regulation 48 CFR 31.2 – all incorporated by reference and found at
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR Contractor also agrees to comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code 12990 (a-f) and the applicable regulations promulgated there under California Code of Regulations, Title2, Section 7285.

Ecology Center may withhold payment of funds for expenses deemed unallowable by CDFA. In the event that it is determined by the Ecology Center that a contractor has been paid for work and expenses that are deemed unallowable, Contractor will be required to refund to the Ecology Center all grant funds which were disbursed to the Contractor for unallowable expenses.

3. Compensation. Project Expenses. and Payment Terms. A budget that is agreed to by both parties is attached to this Agreement as Attachment A. Total expenses for Services, excluding incentives, shall not exceed $510.00.

Contractor agrees to distribute $3,750 in incentives on SNAP/CalFresh purchases as set forth in Attachment B. Total payment for Services and Incentives distribution under this Agreement shall not exceed $4,260.

Contractor may only distribute incentives at outlets that have been approved for participation by USDA’s Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) via a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). A signed MOU between CDFA and each outlet must be reviewed and approved by FNS prior to the outlet’s participation. Distributing incentives at outlets not approved by FNS is a violation of this contract and Contractor will be required to repay grant funds for incentives distributed through unauthorized outlets.

Any changes to the attached budget must be agreed to in writing by the Ecology Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1155 of 1274 Center prior to Contractor incurring costs exceeding the original budgeted amount of any line item. Contractor is entitled to reimbursement for reasonable expenses to the extent that such expenses are budgeted, necessary for the performance of the Services under this Agreement, and are considered allowable costs under applicable Federal and State regulations as outlined and noted in Section 2. of this contract agreement. Monthly invoices and back-up documentation shall be e-mailed in the provided Excel formats and submitted by the 7th day of the month following the reporting/invoicing month to receive payment within thirty (30) days of the Ecology Center’s receipt of the invoice and all required backup documentation, with the exception that in no case shall the Contractor receive payment prior to the Ecology Center’s receipt of payment from the Grantor for the period billed.

Monthly invoices must be submitted using the invoice, timesheet and mileage tracking templates provided by the Ecology Center and must adhere to all procedures and policies as required by the Ecology Center. Invoicing documents must include the dates and hours worked and the nature of the work performed in the description. Contractor shall attach original or scanned copies of receipts for all expenses billed under this Agreement. All original receipts, invoices, and other back-up documentation must be retained by the Contractor and kept on file, available on request for audit purposes. The invoice and all required documentation must be submitted before a payment will be processed. The Ecology Center may withhold payment on an invoice until all required information or documentation has been provided by Contractor. Monthly progress reports are due by the 7th day of the month following the reporting month and must include a description of the progress made on grant deliverables as described in Attachment A. Progress reports must also include a description of the amount of incentives distributed by market/site for the reporting month.

4. Independent Contractor. Contractor and the Ecology Center agree that Contractor is, and shall be, an independent contractor and not an employee or agent of the Ecology Center. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating the relationship of employer and employee between the Ecology Center and Contractor and/or Contractor's approved employees or subcontractors.

Contractor is responsible for all applicable legal and governmental obligations as an independent contractor, including, without limitation, all business licenses, worker's compensation and liability insurance requirements and the withholding and transmittal of all fees and taxes. Contractor shall not be an agent of the Ecology Center and shall not have any authority to sign agreements for the Ecology Center or to bind the Ecology Center to any agreements or other obligations.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1156 of 1274 Any agreement to be executed for the Ecology Center shall be presented to and be signed by a duly authorized representative of the Ecology Center.

It is expected that Contractor will work directly with the Ecology Center in performing the Services. However, if Contractor wishes to hire subcontractors in performance of the Services, Contractor must obtain the prior written consent of the Ecology Center and, in that event: (i) each approved subcontractor must agree to terms consistent with the terms of this Agreement; (ii) approved subcontractors shall be Contractor's sole responsibility; and (iii) Contractor shall be solely responsible for the approved subcontractors' compensation and for compliance with all applicable legal and tax requirements.

5. Taxes: If Contractor, or Contractor's organization, is not incorporated, the Ecology Center will inform Contractor of the total amount of payments made to Contractor on a calendar year basis during January of the following year and report such payments as required by law. Contractor shall be responsible for complying with all applicable national and local employment, income and other tax laws.

6. Indemnification: Contractor agrees to protect, indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Ecology Center and its directors, officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, losses, settlements, taxes, damages, injuries, costs or expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees and all other fees and costs incurred in investigating or defending any claim or action), either directly or indirectly, which may be asserted against any of the foregoing persons by Contractor, Contractor's employees, agents or subcontractors, or third parties, in any manner related to, arising out of or resulting from:
(a) Contractor's performance of the Services under this Agreement; (b) any failure of Contractor to perform its obligations under this Agreement; (c) any claim that the Services and/or Deliverables infringe the intellectual property rights of a third person;
(d) any acts of Contractor beyond the scope of its authority under this Agreement; (e) any negligence, willful misconduct or other wrongful acts or omissions of Contractor, its employees, agents or subcontractors; (f) any injury, damage or death to Contractor, its employees, agents, subcontractors,
partners or other representatives; or
(g) any injury, damage or death to any third party.

7. Representations and Warranties: Contractor represents and warrants that: (a) Contractor has the full power to enter into and perform this Agreement and to make the grant of rights contained herein; (b) all Services performed hereunder Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1157 of 1274 shall be performed in accordance with the Ecology Center's specifications and requirements and with all necessary care, skill and diligence; (c) the Deliverables will meet the description of Deliverables set forth in Attachment B; (d) upon delivery of each Deliverable, the Ecology Center will have marketable title to such Deliverable, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; and (e) the use of the Deliverables for the purposes intended will not infringe upon or violate any rights of privacy, publicity, patents, copyrights or any other rights of any nature of any third party.

8. Confidentiality. Contractor acknowledges that Contractor will have access to proprietary and confidential information in order to perform specific duties and provide the Services. Contractor warrants that Contractor will not use or disclose any information received or obtained by Contractor in connection with Contractor's performance of the Services except as necessary to perform the Services. Contractor shall use at least the same degree of care, but no less than reasonable care, to avoid disclosure or use of the Ecology Center's information as Contractor employs with respect to its own Confidential Information of a like importance. This warranty shall not apply in any instance where the Ecology Center has expressly directed Contractor, in writing, to disclose information to a third party.

9. Legal Compliance. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any action to enforce this Agreement shall be brought in the Superior Court for the County of Alameda or in the U.S.

District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco, California.

10.Assignment. Contractor may not assign, delegate or subcontract neither this Agreement nor any of its rights, duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Ecology Center. Any purported assignment or delegation not consented to by the Ecology Center shall be void at the Ecology Center’s option and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement.

11.Amendments and Waivers. Any supplement to or modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both Parties. A waiver by either party of any breach of this Agreement will not operate as a waiver of any other breach of this Agreement.

12. Notices. All notices required under this Agreement will be delivered in writing to the recipient's contact designated in the first paragraph of this Agreement, or to such other contact as designated in writing from time to time. Notices shall be by hand delivery, nationally recognized overnight courier, certified or registered mail, email, or facsimile and will be effective Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1158 of 1274 upon receipt or when delivery is refused, whichever occurs sooner.

13.Records. All financial records and documentation pertaining to this contract, including incentives and match expenses, will be maintained for three years after the completion of the grant period. All original expense receipts, invoices, and other back-up documentation must be retained by the Contractor and kept on file, available on request for audit purposes.

If any provision of this Agreement is prohibited or is unenforceable, said provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability, without invalidating any of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties and supersedes any and all previous agreements, which may have been made, whether orally or in writing.

WHEREFORE, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date(s) set forth below.

The Ecology Center
Signed: ____________________________________
Martin Bourque, Executive Director
Date: 1/5/2022
City of Redlands
Signed: __________________________________
Mayor
Printed Name: ___________________________________
Date: _________________________________
Attest:
___________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1159 of 1274

PERSONNEL TITLE

NAME OF

PERSONNEL

PERFORMING
WORK

PERSONNEL
SALARY

PERCENT

ALLOCATED ON

PROJECT
CAL. MONTHS

ON PROJECT

FRINGE RATE (IF

APPLICABLE)

EXPENSE TOTAL
(SAL & FB) GRANT FUNDS NON-FEDERAL MATCH TOTAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION (NARRATIVE) MATCH SOURCE (IF APPLICABLE) $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERSONNEL TITLE

NAME OF

PERSONNEL

PERFORMING
WORK

PERSONNEL

HOURLY RATE

NUMBER OF

HOURS ON

PROJECT IN
PERIOD

EXPENSE TOTAL
(SAL & FB) GRANT FUNDS NON-FEDERAL MATCH TOTAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION (NARRATIVE) MATCH SOURCE (IF APPLICABLE) Program Specialist Conrad Calbes $29.50 150 $6,858.75 $6,858.75 $6,858.75 (Admin) Conrad will be working 2 hours per week planning, marketing, outreach, attending webinars, data collecting, and invoicing. He will also distribute EBT and Market Match scrip at the Saturday Morning Farmers Market (2 hours) for 25 Saturdays a year (25 Saturdays x 2 hours) = 50 market + (2 admin x 50 weeks) = 150 hours
Cash match for is earned revenue from booth fees generated at both markets
Program Specialist Shari Haynes $28.10 50 $2,177.75 $2,177.75 $2,177.75 For 12 months of the year, Shari will be swiping customer EBT cards and distributing EBT and Market Match scrip at the Saturday Morning Certified Farmers Market (2 hours). (25 Saturdays a year x 2 hours distributing Market Match = 50 hours a year)
Cash match for is earned revenue from booth fees generated at both markets
Program Aid Seth Henry $15.09 50 $1,327.92 $1,327.92 $1,327.92 For 12 months of the year, Seth will be swiping customer EBT cards and distributing EBT and Market Match scrip at the Saturday Morning Certified Farmers Market (2 hours). (25 Saturdays a year x 2 hours distributing Market Match = 50 hours a year)
Cash match for is earned revenue from booth fees generated at both markets
Program Aid Michael Gonzalez $15.09 50 $1,290.20 $1,290.20 $1,290.20 For 12 months of the year, Michael will be swiping customer EBT cards and distributing EBT and Market Match scrip at the Saturday Morning Certified Farmers Market (2 hours). (25 Saturdays a year x 2 hours distributing Market Match = 50 hours a year)
Cash match for is earned revenue from booth fees generated at both markets
Program Aid Julie Schneblin $15.09 50 $1,343.01 $1,343.01 $1,343.01 For 12 months of the year, Julie will be swiping customer EBT cards and distributing EBT and Market Match scrip at the Saturday Morning Certified Farmers Market (2 hours). (25 Saturdays a year x 2 hours distributing Market Match = 50 hours a year)
Cash match for is earned revenue from booth fees generated at both markets
Program Aid Steven Lujan $15.09 50 $1,305.29 $1,305.29 $1,305.29 For 12 months of the year, Steven will be swiping customer EBT cards and distributing EBT and Market Match scrip at the Saturday Morning Certified Farmers Market (2 hours). (25 Saturdays a year x 2 hours distributing Market Match = 50 hours a year)
Cash match for is earned revenue from booth fees generated at both markets
$7,444.16 $0.00 $7,444.17 7444.17
EXPENSE $ GRANT FUNDS NON-FEDERAL

MATCH TOTAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION (NARRATIVE) MATCH SOURCE (IF APPLICABLE) N/A $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

COST PER UNIT NUMBER OF
UNITS EXPENSE $ GRANT FUNDS NON-FEDERAL MATCH TOTAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION (NARRATIVE) MATCH SOURCE (IF APPLICABLE) $0.00 $0.00 No travel, conference will be virtual
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
55%
55%
76%
71%
78%
73%

SECTION C TOTAL
SECTION D: TRAVEL

EXPENSE DESCRIPTION TYPE OF TRAVEL (DROPDOWN
MENU)

CITY OF REDLANDS
MARKET MATCH BUDGET: JAN 1 2022 - DEC 31 2022
SECTION A: SALARIED PERSONNEL (DO NOT INCLUDE VOLUNTEERS)

SECTION A TOTAL
SECTION B: HOURLY PERSONNEL (DO NOT INCLUDE VOLUNTEERS) FRINGE RATE % (IF APPLICABLE)

SECTION B TOTAL
SECTION C: EQUIPMENT (GREATER THAN $5,000)

EQUIPMENT ITEM
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1160 of 1274 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

COST PER UNIT NUMBER OF
UNITS EXPENSE $ GRANT FUNDS NON-FEDERAL MATCH TOTAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION (NARRATIVE) MATCH SOURCE (IF APPLICABLE) $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

COST PER UNIT NUMBER OF
UNITS EXPENSE $ GRANT FUNDS NON-FEDERAL MATCH TOTAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION (NARRATIVE) MATCH SOURCE (IF APPLICABLE) $50.00 3 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 Social Media outreach for Market Match attracting targeted local customers 3 ads @ $50 each = $150
$0.16 1,000 $160.00 $160.00 $160.00
Outreach materials will be distributed at both markets and at local community organizations, including YMCA, Community Centers, Senior Centers, Library, Food Pantries and more to inform CalFresh customers about the incentive program at the Redlands Farmers Markets 1,000 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 Scrip tokens will be used to distribute Market Match funds during both markets
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$510.000 $510.00 $0.00 $510.00

INDIRECT RATE
(IF APPLICABLE) MTDC TOTAL INDIRECT
$2,130.00 $0.00

TOTAL GRANT
FUNDS
TOTAL NONFEDERAL MATCHTOTAL PROJECT
BUDGET
$4260.00 $7,444.17 $11,704.17

GRANT FUNDS NON-FEDERAL

MATCH TOTAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION (NARRATIVE) MATCH SOURCE (IF APPLICABLE) $3,750.00 $3,750.00 We estimate approximately 5 customers per market day, receiving $15 incentives each. 5 x $15 x 50 markets = $3,750

2. Publication Costs Social media advertisement for
customer outreach

2. Publication Costs Market Match Flyers for customer
outreach

1. Materials & Supplies Market Match Scrip
SECTION I: TOTAL DIRECT & INDIRECT COSTS

SECTION F TOTAL
SECTION H: INDIRECT COSTS

TOTAL GRANT INDIRECT
SECTION H TOTAL $0.00
SECTION I TOTAL All expenses (grant and match) must directly benefit and be specifically identifiable with approved Market Match project objectives.

SECTION E: TOTAL INCENTIVES

DOLLAR AMOUNT OF INCENTIVES TO DISTRIBUTE

EXPENSE DESCRIPTION

SECTION D TOTAL
SECTION E: PARTICIPANT/TRAINING COSTS (EXCLUDING INCENTIVES)

EXPENSE DESCRIPTION TYPE OF TRAINING COST
(DROPDOWN MENU)

SUBSECTION & EXPENSE TYPE
(DROPDOWN MENU)

SECTION E TOTAL
SECTION F: OTHER DIRECT COSTS
$0.20
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1161 of 1274

NON-INCENTIVE
FUNDS

INCENTIVE
FUNDS

INCENTIVES AS

PERCENT OF

TOTAL BUDGET
$510.00 $3,750.00 88%
$7954.17 $3,750.00 32%

GRANT FUNDS

TOTAL BUDGET

NON-INCENTIVE TO INCENTIVE FUNDING
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1162 of 1274 Attachment B: Scope of Work
Attachment B: Scope of Work
Contractor Name: City of Redlands
Start Date: January 1, 2022
End Date: December 31, 2022
Distribution of Incentives
Contractor will
● Distribute $3,750 Market Match (MM) incentives to SNAP customers at a minimum of 1 Ecology Center-approved Certified Farmers’ Markets or farmdirect sites between January 2022 and December 2022; ● Provide incentives that are funded by GusNIP federal dollars or non-federal match only for SNAP/CalFresh purchases;
● Provide incentives that are funded by GusNIP federal dollars or non-federal match only at outlets (sites) that have been approved for participation by USDA’s Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) via a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).

A signed MOU between CDFA and each outlet must be reviewed and approved by FNS prior to the outlet’s participation. Distributing incentives at outlets not approved by FNS is a violation of this contract and Contractor will be required to repay grant funds for incentives distributed through unauthorized outlets. ● Provide the incentives as a dollar-for-dollar SNAP match, up to contractor-set maximum per household, per day;
● Produce or reuse all MM scrip needed at the markets served by Contractor. In the case where new scrip is produced or printed, the design must first be approved by the EC’s Market Match Program Coordinator, Program Manager, Program Director or Executive Director prior to production;
● Market Match scrip must be restricted to the purchase of fresh, California-grown fruits and vegetables or plant starts that produce food only at the Certified Farmers’ Market or other approved Market Match site. No change is to be given on Market Match scrip. 100% of the value of the scrip turned in by the farmers/growers/vendors must be paid at 100% of the value to said farmers/growers/vendors.

Administration and Reporting
Contractor will
● Hire and maintain sufficient staff or volunteers to execute the program as detailed; ● Oversee, track, evaluate, manage, report on any and all Market Match activities under the contract that Contractor is providing or subcontracting; ● Turn in monthly invoices, back-up documentation and monthly reports no later than the 7th of each month following the month previous or as requested by the Ecology Center;
● Attend 4-6 Consortium calls/webinars. If Contractor is not able to attend for any reason, they will be responsible to tell Ecology Center Program Manager in advance, and read minutes or watch webinar recording following the webinar. ● Attend the annual virtual/online Market Match Face-to-Face Meeting/Conference.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1163 of 1274 Attachment B: Scope of Work
Systems, Tracking, Evaluation
Contractor will work with the Ecology Center to
● Administer a unified data collection and tracking mechanism for Market Match participants in order to track all monthly reporting and evaluation metrics accurately and in a timely fashion;
● Provide input, feedback, and cooperation on the development, implementation, and execution of State and National evaluation metrics, tools, and systems; ● Carefully track federal and non-federal match budget spending and work with the Ecology Center on any necessary Line Item Shift adjustments or Grant reporting requirements.

Contractor will
● Carefully and completely track, input, and report on all program metrics that are deemed useful/needed by the Ecology Center. These monthly reports will be provided by or before the 7th of each month following the month previous; ● Cooperate fully and support data collection and analysis conducted through Ecology Center and California Department of Food & Agriculture’s required evaluation of the GusNIP project, and any national evaluation conducted through the GusNIP Training, Technical Assistance, Evaluation and Information Centers (NTAE).

Promotions & Outreach to Market Match Eligible Customers ● All Market Match promotional and outreach materials and signage must be approved by the EC’s Market Match Program Coordinator, Program Manager, Program Director or Executive Director prior to printing and distribution; ● All promotional and outreach materials and signage must promote the Market Match program and align with program branding, messaging, look and feel.

Contractor will
● Produce locally-focused, MM branded, outreach materials and advertising in accordance with approved budget and budget justification; ● Partner with local media, social service agencies, and community based organizations to distribute outreach materials to promote the purchase of fruits and vegetables to SNAP/CalFresh shoppers at Certified Farmers’ Markets and other approved Market Match sites.

Contractor will work with the Ecology Center to
● Improve and build upon uniform MM language and statewide materials; ● Participate in any and all statewide, regional or locally focused centralized promotions or outreach strategies executed by the Ecology Center on behalf of the statewide MM program.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1164 of 1274 Attachment C

DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION FORM
The Contractor certifies that, neither the Contractor firm nor any owner, partner, director, officer, or principal of the Contractor, nor any person in a position with management responsibility or responsibility for the administration of federal funds:
(a) Is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, and declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal or state department/agency; (b) Has within a three-year period preceding this certification been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against it for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public transaction or contract (federal, state, or local); violation of federal or state antitrust statutes; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Is presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (b) above; or
(d) Has within a three-year period preceding this certification had one or more public transactions or contracts (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.

The Contractor further certifies that it shall not knowingly enter into any transaction with any subcontractor, material supplier, or vendor who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal or state department/agency.

Date:

By
Authorized Signature for Contractor
Printed Name and Title
Redlands Regular Meeting of 01-18-2022 Page 1165 of 1274 -------- --- --------

CITY OF REDLANDS

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION
DATE OF REQUEST: 1/18/2021 FINANCE USE ONLY
TRANSACTION NO:

An additional appropriation is hereby requested as follows: ACCOUNTING PERIOD: -------- Department: Facilities & Community Services
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION INCREASE (if applicable)
Account Description Orgkey Object Code Job Ledger (If Amount applicable) Full Time Salaries 200300 5001 C300005 $510.00
Food 200300 7807 C300005 $3,750.00
'
$ $4,260.00
REVENUE APPROPRIATION INCREASE (if applicable)
Account Description Orgkey Object Code Job Ledger (If Amount applicable) State Grant 200300 4401 C300005 $510.00
Federal Grant 200300 4407 C300005 $3,750.00
$ $4,260.00
JUSTIFICATION: CY 2021 participation in the California Market Match Grant awarded through the Ecology Center to fund certified farmers' market activities at the City;s certified farmers market.

Requested By: ------,----..,...,...----- Chris Boatman
Depa rt men t Head
Recommended
Yes y('
By
N
Finance
o
Director
Signe �J �
Comments: