Agenda packet — Redlands City Council, July 16, 2024 (part 6 of 10)

Other applicable standards do exist for daytime construction noise impacts, such as in Section 7.1 of the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual3.

This threshold, or a threshold from another applicable document, should be chosen to compare to modeled construction noise levels in an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to ensure that substantial temporary increases in ambient noise levels are not caused by this project.

Baseline Noise Level Characterizations are Incomplete
CEQA requires evaluation of whether a project would cause a “substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels.” Without knowing how loud the environment is, it is impossible to determine if the new project will increase noise in the surrounding community. Baseline noise measurements are the preferred way to determine background noise sources. These measurements serve as a crucial reference point for evaluating the potential noise impacts of proposed projects or activities. Without establishing the baseline noise conditions before any new development occurs, decision-makers cannot effectively determine whether the project complies with noise regulations nor identify any potential adverse effects on the surrounding environment and communities. Given the proximity to both local streets and Interstate 10 (I-10), along with noise from nearby residences and commercial parking lots, as well as shielding from the main noise source of I-10, noise levels should be physically measured to be accurately determined. An EIR must be prepared with baseline noise measurements, to properly describe the noise environment.

Document Includes no Discussion of Operational Noise
Day-to-day operational noise levels are not discussed in the MND at all. Typical sources from a warehouse project can include loading dock noise, rooftop mechanical noise, and parking lot noise, among other sources. These can combine to increase ambient noise levels and can be more sensitive than construction noise due to the more permanent nature of the duration. Section 8.06.080 of the Redlands noise code states that no entity can “operate or cause to be operated any source of sound, or allow the creation of any noise, which causes the noise level when measured inside a neighboring receiving occupied building to exceed” the standard of 60 dBA for industrial buildings.

As an example, rooftop commercial HVAC units may reach as high as 88 dBA at a 3 feet reference level, in which case three of these units could exceed the industrial interior noise limit of 60 dBA set in section 8.06.080 at 140 feet away (the distance between the project and the nearest façade to the west). This assumes open windows in the neighboring facility, but does not include any noise due to exterior loading dock or parking lot operations. Either way, the potential for noise impacts exists, and as such should be studied more thoroughly in an EIR.

Construction Vibration Thresholds could be Exceeded
Section 8.06.020 of the Redlands City Code sets a vibration perception threshold stating that the “perception threshold shall be presumed to be a motion velocity of 0.01 inches per second over the range of one to one hundred (100) Hz.” Section 8.06.090(G) prohibits “operating or permitting the operation of any device that creates a vibration which is above the vibration perception threshold of an individual at or beyond the property boundary of the source if on private property.” Section 3 https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-andvibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1377 of 2362

WILSON IHRIG
California & Lugonia Project
Comments on Noise Analysis

Page 4 ends

8.06.120 lists exemptions for construction activity stating the noise statute “shall not apply to noise sources associated with new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or grading of any property.” This sets a vibration threshold in the City of a Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 0.01 in/sec, with exemptions for construction noise, not construction vibration. A vibratory roller, operated at the western property line would create a PPV level of 0.016 in/sec. This is using the formula for vibration attenuation from the FTA manual (Eq. 7-2) and the source level for a vibratory roller found in the same manual (Table 7-4). This would be an exceedance, and thus construction vibration should be studied in an EIR.

Conclusion
The MND has several errors and omissions. The noise analysis is lacking substance and includes no mention of ambient measurements, daytime construction thresholds, or discussion of mechanical noise. Additionally, there is a chance of a construction vibration impact. Please feel free to contact me with any questions on this information.

Very truly yours,

WILSON IHRIG
Jack Meighan
Associate
meighan - california & lugonia mnd - comments on noise anaylsis.docx Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1378 of 2362

JACK MEIGHAN
Associate
Jack joined Wilson Ihrig in 2021 and is an experienced acoustics engineer with expertise in projects involving rail transit systems, highways, CEQA analysis, environmental noise reduction, mechanical drawing reviews, and construction noise and vibration mitigation. He has hands-on experience with project management, including client coordination and presentations, as well as in designing, developing, and testing MATLAB code used in acoustics applications. Additionally, his expertise includes taking field measurements, developing test plans and specifying, purchasing, setting up and repairing acoustic measurement equipment. He has experience in using Traffic Noise Model (TNM), CadnaA, EASE, Visual Basic, LabView, and CAD software.

Education
 B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Project Experience
Metro Regional Connector, Los Angeles CA
Planned, took, and processed measurements as part of a team to determine the effectiveness of floating slab trackwork for a new subway in downtown Los Angeles that travels below the Walt Disney Concert Hall and the Colburn School of Music.

Rodeo Credit Enterprise CEQA Analysis for New Construction, Palmdale, CA Wrote an accepted proposal and executed it for a noise study project to determine noise mitigation requirements on a new housing development. Led all aspects of the project and managed the budget during all phases of project completion. Completed 5 separate projects of this type for this developer.

Blackhall Studios, Santa Clarita, CA
Led the vibration measurement effort for a new soundstage directly adjacent to an existing freight and commuter rail line. Tested equipment, processed data, and analyzed results to determine the vibration propagation through the soil to the proposed soundstage locations, and was part of the team that developed mitigation techniques for the office spaces directly next to the rail line.

Octavia Residential Condos CEQA Study, San Francisco, CA Calculated the STC ratings for the proposed windows to meet Title 24 requirements, modeled the acoustic performance of floor and ceiling structures, researched noise codes, helped with a mechanical design review, and wrote a report summarizing the results for a new Condominium project being developed in San Francisco.

San Diego International Airport Terminal I Replacement, CA Conducted interior noise and vibration measurements, analyzed measurement data to help determine project criteria, modeled the existing and future terminals in CadnaA, and was part of a team that did a complete HVAC analysis of the entire terminal, as part of a CEQA analysis where a new terminal for the airport is being designed.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1379 of 2362

WILSON IHRIG
Jack Meighan – Page 2
*Work done prior to working for Wilson Ihrig
Five Points Apartments Noise Study, Whittier, CA
Took measurements, researched sound data and solutions, and recommended mitigation for a new apartment complex that was located next to an existing car wash, as part of a CEQA review.

USC Ellison Vibration Survey, Los Angeles, CA
Conducted vibration measurements as part of a survey to determine the effectiveness of vibration isolation platforms that are used to insulate cell growth in a cancer research facility. Determined the effectiveness and presented this information to the client. Researched and recommended a permanent monitoring system so the client could view data in real time.

TEN50 Condos ‘Popping’ Noise Investigation, Los Angeles, CA Was part of a team that investigated the noise source of an unwanted popping noise in luxury condos in Downtown Los Angeles. Helped isolate the noise source location with accelerometers to determine where vibrations were occurring first and used an acoustic camera to determine where in the condo the noise was coming from.
2000 University Project, Berkely, CA
Wrote a construction noise monitoring plan based on environmental noise calculations, wrote a report summarizing the results, and attending a meeting with the client to discuss options.

Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) On‐Track, CA, San Francisco Bay Area, CA* Day to day project manager, responsible for meetings, presentations, and coordination with the client for an ongoing noise study on the BART system. Developed MATLAB code to process measurements and determine areas where high corrugation was present, contributing to excessively high in-car noise levels. Performed noise measurements inside both the right of way and the vehicle cabin, in addition to rail corrugation measurements.

California I‐605/SR‐60 Interchange Improvement, Los Angeles, CA* Developed a noise model of the area that predicted sound levels for abatement design, in addition to conducting noise measurements and analysis. Led the Team in use of the FHWA Traffic Noise Model Software for the project, involving three major highways and two busy interchanges extending over 17 miles in southern California.

Sound Transit On‐Track, Seattle, WA*
Took measurements, fixed equipment, and developed software in MATLAB to process Corrugation Analysis Trolley measurements as part of an ongoing noise study on the Sound Transit Link system.

Tested vibration data to determine the best measurement and processing techniques to store the data in an online database for in-car measurements.

LA Metro CRRC Railcar Testing, Los Angeles, CA*
Led the effort to plan the measurements, determine measurement locations and finalize the test plan. Formulated a method to capture speed data directly from legacy train vehicles. Executed noise and vibration specification measurements for new rail cars delivered by CRRC.

City of Los Angeles, Pershing Square Station Rehabilitation Noise Monitoring, CA* Built noise models, wrote a construction noise plan, and assisted in on-site construction noise issues as they arose for a renovation of the Pershing Square metro station in downtown Los Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1380 of 2362

WILSON IHRIG
Jack Meighan – Page 3
*Work done prior to working for Wilson Ihrig
Angeles. Trained construction personnel in techniques for noise reduction and how to conduct noise monitoring measurements to meet project specifications.

City of Orange Metrolink Parking Garage Construction Monitoring, CA* Wrote an adaptive management vibration monitoring plan, set up equipment to monitor live vibration levels, and generated weekly reports as part of an effort to build a new parking garage.

Designed, planned, and completed measurements to predict and mitigate pile driving construction impacts at three historic building locations adjacent to the construction site. Coordinated with the client whenever an on-site problem arose.

LA Metro Westside Subway Construction, Los Angeles, CA* Planned, organized, and processed noise measurements for the Purple Line extension construction.

Implemented both long term microphones to measure noise levels and accelerometers to measure vibration levels in existing subway tunnels. Oversaw noise monitoring at sensitive construction sites for the project and worked with the contractor to find ways to reduce construction noise levels by approximately 10dB.

Montreal Réseau Express Métropolitain, Canada*
Conducted vibration propagation measurements used to create models to predict operational vibration levels for an under-construction transit line. Managed equipment, solved problems in the field, and wrote parts of the report summarizing the findings of the acoustic study.

NHCRP Barrier*
Took on-highway measurements and wrote, designed, developed, and tested MATLAB code to identify specific spectrograms to use for analyses for a project evaluating barrier reflected highway traffic noise differences in the presence of a single absorptive or reflective noise barrier.

Siemens Railcar Testing for Sound Transit, Seattle, WA* Measured in-car noise and vibration for new rail cars delivered by Siemens. Developed new internal techniques for measurements based on the written specifications. Contributed to the team that helped identify issues that new cars had in meeting the Sound Transit specifications for noise and vibration. Participated in developing the test plan and specified then acquired new equipment for the measurement.

Toronto/Ontario Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail, Final Design, Canada* Assisted in vibration propagation measurements, analysis, and recommendations for mitigation for a 12-mile light-rail line both on and under Eglinton Avenue. Set up and ran equipment for at-grade measurements with an impact hammer for underground measurements with an impact load cell that was used during pre-construction borehole drilling.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1381 of 2362
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1382 of 2362
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1383 of 2362

SOCIO-ECONOMIC EVALUATION CHECKLIST FORM

BACKGROUND

1. Project Title: Planned Development No. 7 and Lot Merger No. 8

2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Mailing Address:

City of Redlands City of Redlands
Development Services Department Development Services – Planning 35 Cajon Street, Suite 20 P.O. Box 3005
Redlands, CA 92373 Redlands, CA 92373

3. Contact Person & Telephone: Kevin Beery, Senior Planner (909) 798-7555 x2

4. Project Location: The project site is located on the west side of California Street between Lugonia Avenue and Interstate 10 (APNs: 0292-033-11-0000 and 0292- 033-13-0000).

5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: CRP/NPP Redlands Industrial Owner, LLC, 1330 Factory Place, Suite 105, Los Angeles, CA 90013

6. General Plan Designation: Commercial/Industrial

7. Zoning Designation: East Valley Corridor Specific Plan (EVCSP) Special Development (EV/SD) District

8. Description of Project: A development proposal to merge two parcels encompassing approximately 16.0 net acres and thereon construct a 357,610 square-foot warehouse building and related site improvements including parking lots, a loading area, landscaping, screen walls, lighting, onsite stormwater detention facilities and utility connections. The project site is located on the west side of California Street between Lugonia Avenue and the westbound on-ramp to Interstate 10. The project is not exempt from environmental review and a mitigated negative declaration is proposed in accordance with the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

9. Existing On-site Land Use and Setting: Previously developed with an amusement park that was demolished in 2021. The site is now vacant except for the remains of former park attractions.

10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Commercial and industrial development to the north and west. Offices, commercial, medical, and institutional uses to the east.

Interstate 10 and Metrolink right-of-way to the south.

11. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1384 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 2 of 20 ends

COST BENEFIT FACTORS:

The cost benefit factors are evaluated independently using the cost benefit model. A positive or negative cost/benefit ratio will be derived by evaluating projects. A complete model used to evaluate the project is available in the Development Services Department.

A summary of that analysis is provided here:

According to the Cost Benefit Model used by the City, the project is projected to result in annual non-residential revenues of $197,250.50 to the City upon project implementation, and annual ongoing costs of $17,672.30. The surplus revenue is $179,578.20. The cost benefit ratio has a factor of 11.16. The complete Cost/Benefit Model results are attached herein.

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND EFFECT ON THE CITY OF REDLANDS:

Identify the public infrastructure required for development of this project and identify the source(s) of funding for these improvements. Identify the effects of such development upon the City of Redlands.
a. List of public infrastructure required for the project:

The applicant will provide the infrastructure as required by the Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department. The developer will be installing all required off-site improvements. The proposed development will provide the following:

1. Roads (Lane Miles): 0.0

2. Storm Drain (Lineal Feet): 0.0

3. Traffic Intersections Requires Signals: 0.0

4. Aggregate Landscaping (Acres): 0.0

5. Street Lights: 0.0

6. Trails (Lineal Miles): 0.0
b. Sources of funding for these improvements to include developer installed payment of impact fees, assessment districts, etc.:

The developer will be required to pay applicable development impact fees and permit fees as required by the Redlands Municipal Code. c. The effect of the project upon the City of Redlands relative to public infrastructure is as follows:

The project will require the use of public infrastructure such as sewer, water, public Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1385 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 3 of 20 ends

safety and roads. To mitigate the impact of the development on public infrastructure, development impact fees will be assessed against the project and charged prior to issuance of a building permit. Accordingly, the proposed development would not adversely affect the existing public infrastructure systems below existing performance levels.

BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT TO THE CITY OF REDLANDS
The following is a list of benefits that can be attributed to the proposed project. The benefits may fall into the categories identified or a miscellaneous category. Each benefit identified will be described in detail with supporting reasons as to how the item benefits the community.

A. Citrus Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project preserve citrus? The following are accepted ways to enhance or preserve citrus which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide conservation easement(s) on citrus groves the City hopes to preserve.

2. Acquire citrus grove(s) and donate all or a portion of the grove to the City.

3. Enhance viability and productivity of existing groves by enhancing irrigation or adding frost water.

4. Maintain a viable buffer of citrus around the project (at least 3 rows).

5. Other ways to preserve citrus.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to citrus enhancement or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project does not involve existing citrus crops or land designated and/or reserved for agricultural purposes. The site was previously developed with an amusement park. Therefore, the proposed development would not impact the local citrus industry.

B. Cultural Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve cultural aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve cultural aspects of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Contributes to “art in public places” concept to a minimum of 1% of total project value.

2. Contributes to the alleviation of problems at cultural sites.

3. Provides an electronic library available to the public.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1386 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 4 of 20 ends

4. Enhances or contributes to current services or cultural resources.

5. Contribute to performing arts venues.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to cultural enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: In-lieu of meeting the standard for minimum sitewide landscaping coverage (15%) for industrial developments in the EVCSP, the project proposes to contribute an onsite art installation (in a location visible from the public realm) that will be valued at a minimum of 1% of total project value. Furthermore, the project will pay Cityestablished development impact fees and provide additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, business license tax, and other revenue sources that will indirectly provide funding that will contribute to enhancing and/or maintaining some of the cultural facilities within the City.

C. Heritage Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve heritage aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve heritage aspects of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Renovates existing historic homes.

2. The project has design features which include garage doors do not face street; 50% wrap around porch on 1-1/2 sides; broad overhangs on roof; driveway located on the side of house or a circular drive; decorative wood, masonry or wrought iron fence.

3. Adaptive reuse of historic structures in appropriate zones.

4. Forming a new or annexing to an existing historic district.

5. Designation of a structure as an individual historic resource.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to heritage enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project site is currently vacant and is not located in a designated historic district. Accordingly, there are no impacts and no opportunity to enhance or preserve heritage aspects of the community because these types of resources are not present on-site.

D. Architectural Enhancements. Does the project enhance architectural aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance architectural aspects of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide architectural or decorative enhancements to the Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1387 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 5 of 20 ends

project which exceed normal architectural standards.

2. Trees or other landscaping amenities that exceed minimum requirements.

3. Contribution of off-site enhancements in the public right-of-way, such as sidewalk installation and street tree replacement.

4. Assisting in undergrounding of utility lines.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to architectural enhancements, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The proposed development comprises a single warehouse building featuring a contemporary architectural design and style, as well as related improvements including parking, lighting and landscaping.

The development plan indicates a proposed on-site landscape area of 82,104 square feet.

For industrial facilities in the EVCSP, a minimum of 15 percent of the development site must be landscaped, and a minimum of 7 percent of the parking area must be landscaped.

A total of 12 percent of the site would be landscaped and roughly 10 percent of the parking area is landscaped. In-lieu of satisfying minimum sitewide landscaping coverage standard, the developer has opted to contribute an onsite art installation (in a location visible from the public realm) that will be valued at a minimum of 1% of total project value.

The landscaping plan shows tree species consisting of western redbud, camphor trees, carrotwoods, palms, Afghan pine and African sumac as well as various drought-resistant shrubs and groundcovers. Multiple mature trees located on-site would remain protected in place.

E. Historic Downtown Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve the historic downtown of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve the historic downtown of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Contributes financially to viability of core downtown within expanded downtown.

2. Renovate old buildings.

3. Within an expanded downtown extends DRBA streetscape enhancements.

4. Contributing to the restoration of original building facades of existing structures

5. Re-establishing historical “pedestrian oriented” street frontages where original buildings have been removed.

6. Provides unique adaptive use of historic building.

7. Contributes to alternative means of transportation.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to historic downtown enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1388 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 6 of 20 ends

benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project is not located within the historic downtown district. The project will pay City established development impact fees and provide additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, business license tax, and other revenue sources that will indirectly provide funding that could be utilized to enhance and/or maintain the downtown district.

F. Job Enhancements. Does the project enhance jobs for the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance jobs for the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provides jobs for the community.

2. Brings in revenue from outside the city.

3. Internship opportunities for students at universities, high school and colleges.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to job enhancements, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The proposed development consists of one 357,610 square-foot warehouse building on a site encompassing approximately 16 net acres. The proposed facility will provide a new source of employment for residents of the city and surrounding area and bring additional revenue to the city. The proposed facility is expected to employ 300 people. The proposed facility will provide a source of permanent employment in the future, and temporary jobs during construction.

G. Open Space Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve open space aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve open space within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Hardscape feature that enhances wildlife-water/food/ shelter.

2. Enhanced landscape on commercial project which conceals infrastructure.

3. Waterscaping which increases illusion of open space.

4. Provides open space in addition to zoning requirement.

5. Provides a Planned Residential Development

6. Provides a usable conservation easement across open space in perpetuity.

7. Preserves access for wildlife migration corridor.

8. Provides undisturbed refuge area for wildlife.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to open space enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1389 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 7 of 20 ends

community.

Proposed Project: No publicly accessible open space will be provided on the project site.

Perimeter landscaping is being proposed throughout the project site; the landscape plan indicates that 82,104 square feet will consist of landscaping, which is approximately 12% of site landscaping. In-lieu of satisfying minimum landscaping coverage (15%) for industrial developments in the EVCSP, the developer has opted to contribute an onsite art installation (in a location visible from the public realm) that will be valued at a minimum of 1% of total project value The project site is located in an urbanized area and no wildlife corridors or refuge areas are located on or near the project site.

H. Park Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve parks of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve parks within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Adds improved parkland.

2. Adds parkland beyond requirements.

3. Provides pedestrian and/or bike trails to parks or provides extension of existing pedestrian and/or bike trails from the project site.

4. Adds meeting rooms accessible to local groups on a frequent basis.

5. Improves or adds to existing landscape and/or streetscape at or near the project site.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to park enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The proposed development does not directly involve public parks or recreational facilities. The project will pay City-established development impact fees and provide significant additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, business license tax, and other revenue sources that will directly or indirectly provide funding that may be used to benefit City parks.

I. Public Safety Enhancements. Does the project enhance public safety aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance public safety within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Security infrastructure is provided in an architecturally acceptable manner.

2. Exterior television monitoring on commercial project.

3. Provide a building site or fully equipped fire station or contributes to dedicated City account for future construction.

4. Provides significant additional fire equipment as determined by the Fire Department.

5. Provides for a police substation (subject to City approval).

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1390 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 8 of 20 ends

6. Provides for a building site for a new facility.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to public safety enhancements, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project will provide on-site security lighting (parking lot lighting, exterior building lighting) as well as a secured truck loading/storage yard on the west side of the building. The project will also pay City development impact fees to fund public services, including police and fire services. The project will also provide significant additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, business license tax, and other revenue sources that may assist in funding police and fire facilities and services.

J. School Enhancements. Does the project enhance schools or their operations within the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance schools within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Senior citizen development adds revenue but no impact.

2. Provides day care and after school program(s).

3. Project is close to schools serving the project.

4. Contributes equipment or other enhancements to existing day care and after school programs.

5. Assist schools with land or financing (such as Mello Roos).

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to schools, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project is not a residential development and is not considered growth-inducing in nature, either directly or indirectly. Prior to building permit issuance, the project will pay school facility fees set by the Redlands Unified School District.

K. Traffic. Does the project reduce traffic, enhance systems to improve traffic conditions or otherwise improve traffic within the community? The following are accepted ways to improve traffic within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide financial mitigation which helps alleviate parking problems in town i.e. by contributing to the parking district.

2. Incorporate “traffic calming” elements into the design of the circulation system.

3. Support for alternative forms of public transportation or public transportation facilities.

4. Add biking and pedestrian access to off campus intellectual or entertainment resources.

5. Have a unique method of product/inventory delivery.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1391 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 9 of 20 ends

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to traffic, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: In accordance with Measure U, a traffic impact analysis assessing the potential impacts on levels of service (LOS) caused by the proposed development was prepared. The analysis concludes that the proposed development would not substantially worsen existing roadway traffic in the vicinity below current LOS and, therefore, no mitigating improvements to the transportation system have been identified as necessary. In addition, the project must dedicate a portion of southeast portion of the site to accommodate an additional freeway on-ramp lane to be constructed at a future date.

Payment of development impact fees would adequately mitigate any traffic impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding road network.

L. Wastewater System Enhancements. Does the project enhance the wastewater system within the community? The following are accepted ways to improve the wastewater system within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide a dual system to use potable and non-potable water.

2. Provide financial contributions to tertiary facilities at the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

3. Improve water quality.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to the wastewater system, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The proposed project would connect to the City of Redlands sanitary sewer system. The proposed project would generate wastewater that can be discharged to a municipal system with sufficient capacity. No systemwide improvements or expansions are necessary. The project will pay development impact fees to be used for system maintenance and upgrades.

M. Miscellaneous Preservation or Enhancements. Does the project enhance or preserve elements within the community?
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to enhancement or preservation of elements that are important to the City, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project does not provide any additional enhancements or preservation of elements within the community other than those previously identified.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1392 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 10 of 20 ends

SOCIAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

This project may create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services for those social factors checked below within the "Potentially Significant," “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation” or "Less Than Significant" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Agricultural/Citrus Removal
Wildlife/Habitat
Traffic
Fire Services
Paramedic Services
Police Services
Downtown Impacts
Residential Design
Cultural Facilities
Park Facilities
Recreational Programs
Land Use Compatibility
Schools

DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

X I find that the proposed project will not create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, and no additional information or evaluation is needed.

I find that although the proposed project could create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project by the applicant.

I find that the proposed project may create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, and additional information or evaluation is needed in the following areas:

I find that the proposed project has already been evaluated for socio-economic impacts and the prior evaluation adequately evaluated this project.

Signed: Kevin Beery
Kevin Beery
Senior Planner
City of Redlands
May 1, 2024
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1393 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 11 of 20 ends

EVALUATION OF SOCIAL FACTORS
Explanations of all "Potentially Significant," "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated," "Less Than Significant Impact," and "No Impact" answers are provided on the attached sheets.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. AGRICULTURAL/CITRUS REMOVAL. Would the
proposal:
a) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)? 
b) Remove active citrus groves from production? 
Agricultural/Citrus Removal

1.a,b) The project site is identified by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resource Agency as “urban and built-up” land. The project site is not identified as prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance. The site was previously developed with an amusement park which was demolished in 2021. Therefore, no impacts to farmland or to agricultural resources are identified.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

2. WILDLIFE/HABITAT/OPEN SPACE
PRESERVATION. Would the proposal:
a) Eliminate or have negative impact upon wildlife
corridors? 
b) Tend to urbanize open space impacting
preservation and conservation of natural
resources? 
c) Interfere with use of recognized trails used by
joggers, hikers, equestrians or bicyclists? 
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1394 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 12 of 20 ends

d) Eliminate, reduce, or have any negative impact
upon wildlife habitat areas to include the
protection of fringe or buffer areas? 
Wildlife/Habitat/Open Space Preservation

2.a) The site currently contains remnants of a former amusement park’s abandoned attractions and structures. The entire site has been disturbed and has no potential to serve as wildlife habitat. The project site is surrounded by urban development and is void of any wildlife corridors. No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

2. b) The project site is surrounded by commercial, industrial, and other nonresidential development. The project site has a General Plan designation of Commercial/Industrial. The project would not tend to urbanize open space that could impact preservation and conservation of natural resources.

2. c). There are no recognized trails on or near the project site.

2. d) The project will not eliminate, reduce, or have any negative impact upon wildlife habitat areas to include the protection of fringe or buffer areas. The project site has been previously developed with an amusement park and is surrounded by urban development. The site contains multiple mature landscaped trees remaining from the previous development. In order to avoid the potential impact of disturbing or destroying active bird nests, a preconstruction nesting survey will be required prior to commencement of project construction.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3. TRAFFIC IMPACTS. Would the proposal:
a) Result in increased vehicle trips or congestion? 
b) Create additional traffic so as to be in conflict
with the policies of the General Plan? 
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1395 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 13 of 20 ends

c) Does traffic impact livability of a residential
neighborhood on streets which, due to design
or terrain features, street side development or
other factors, have greater than usual sensitivity
to increased traffic? 
d) Create additional traffic so as to increase the
level of service on roadways that are adjacent
to or in the vicinity of the project? 
Traffic Impacts
3, a-d) The development plan indicates that that site access is to be provided by two proposed driveways on Lugonia Avenue and two existing driveways on California Street. The proposed development would not create a substantial generation of vehicle trips that would worsen traffic congestion (i.e., levels of service) on roadways in the vicinity of the project site. The proposed development is estimated to generate 1,132 passenger-car equivalent (PCE) daily trips with 111 total trips expected in the AM peak hour and 114 total trips expected in the PM peak hour. Based on forecasted existing plus project traffic conditions, nearby intersections are expected to continue functioning at existing performance levels under project operating conditions. Upon project implementation, intersections are not anticipated to operate at a deficient LOS and, accordingly, no roadway system improvements have been identified as necessary.

The project site is in an area designated for commercial and industrial uses and will have access from California Street and Lugonia Avenue, and is adjacent to Interstate 10. There are no residential uses in the immediate area of the project.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1396 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 14 of 20 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

4. FIRE AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES. Will the
proposal result in:
a) Requiring fire and paramedic services that are
beyond the current capabilities of the Fire
Department? 
b) An increase in response time for essential fire
or paramedic services to the remainder of the
community? 
c) The need for additional fire or paramedic
facilities or equipment? 
Fire and Paramedic Services

4.a) The City of Redlands Fire Department indicates that current capabilities are adequate to provide fire and paramedic service demands for this development. The project will incorporate fixed fire protection systems which will mitigate any impacts relative to this issue.

4.b) The City of Redlands Fire Department will provide fire and emergency medical services to the Project. The Fire Department consists of approximately fifty-five (55) total sworn personnel, including eighteen (18) firefighter/paramedics and thirty-seven (37) firefighter/EMTs and covers an area of thirty-seven (37) square miles. The development will not impact essential fire or paramedic services to the remainder of the community. The project would be served by Fire Station No. 264, located at 1270 W. Park Avenue, and is within a minimum response time of five minutes.

4.c) Present capabilities of the Fire Department will not be impacted with development of the project. The project will pay development impact fees which have been established by the City to fund public facilities, including fire stations. These additional revenues to the City, as well as the revenue from increased property tax assessment generated from the future subdivision, will assist in funding fire operations for the area.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1397 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 15 of 20 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

5. POLICE SERVICES. Would the proposal:
a) Requiring police services that are beyond the
current capabilities of the Police Department? 
b) An increase in response time for essential
police services to the remainder of the
community? 
c) The need for additional police facilities or
equipment? 
d) Increase in crime as a result of the type of
business? 
Police Services

5.a-d) Present capabilities of the Redlands Police Department would not be adversely impacted with project development, however, cumulatively the project will, along with future development, require increased police services.

The project will pay development impact fees which have been established by the City to fund public facilities, including police. The project will also provide significant additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, business license tax, and other revenue sources that may assist in funding police services.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

6. DOWNTOWN IMPACTS. Would the proposal:
a) A reduction of the number or types of
businesses located in the downtown? 
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1398 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 16 of 20 ends

b) An unfair or unreasonable competitive
disadvantage to existing businesses
downtown? 
c) Creation of vacant buildings and the potential
for blight? 
d) Cause an unreasonable increase in traffic
downtown? 
e) Economic and social effects of businesses
competing with downtown businesses? 
Downtown Impacts

6.a-e) The proposed project is located approximately 4.5 miles northwest of the Downtown Business District, and therefore, does not have the potential to negatively impact the Downtown Business District. The project, which would result in the expansion of the logistics industry in northwest Redlands, would not adversely affect the economic base of Downtown.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

7. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with existing codes and or standards? 
b) Meet minimum point standards of the
Residential Development Allocation process? 
Residential Design

7.a-b) No impact. The proposed development does not involve residential use.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1399 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 17 of 20 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

8. CULTURAL FACILITIES. Would the proposal result
in:
a) A reduction of the number or types of
businesses located in the downtown? 
b) An unfair or unreasonable competitive
disadvantage to existing businesses
downtown? 
c) Impacts to cultural facilities such as the Smiley
Library, Redlands Bowl, Lincoln Shrine, Joslyn
Center, Community Center, etc? 
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values? 
e) Potential to disturb existing religious facilities?  f) Impact or restrict religious or sacred uses? 
Cultural Facilities

8.a-b) The site is currently vacant and does not contain historic structures. The site is not in a historic district.

8.c) The proposed development would not impact local cultural facilities, such as the Smiley Library, Redlands Bowl, Lincoln Shrine, Joslyn Senior Center and the Community Center. The project will pay development impact fees and provide an increase in revenue to the City from increased property tax assessment, business license tax, and other revenue sources that may assist in providing funding for existing cultural facilities. Thus, the project would not adversely affect cultural facilities.

8.d) No part of this project has the potential to affect unique ethnic cultural values.

8.e-f) The project site was previously developed but is now vacant. There are no Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1400 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 18 of 20 ends

religious facilities located within or adjacent to the project site; therefore, no part of this project will result in impacts to existing religious facilities or restrict religious uses.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

9. PARK FACILITIES AND RECREATIONAL
PROGRAMS. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in use or demand for park facilities or
programs to include manpower, facilities or
equipment? 
b) A ratio of parkland to population which exceeds
standards and or goals established by the
General Plan? 
Park Facilities and Recreational Programs

9.a,b) The proposed development does not involve residential use. Therefore, the project will not adversely affect existing or planned park facilities or recreational programs within the City nor create a significant new demand for additional recreational facilities. The project will pay development impact fees and provide an increase in revenue to the City from increased property tax assessment, business license tax, and other revenue sources that may assist in providing funding that could be used to benefit park facilities and recreational programs.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1401 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 19 of 20 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

10. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY. Would the proposal
result in:
a) Land uses that are not compatible or consistent
with the General Plan? 
b) Economic impacts on businesses and small
property owners from a project? 
c) Physical separation or division of an existing
community 
d) Loss of jobs for the community? 
e) Overcrowding of housing? 
Land Use Compatibility

10.a) The subject property has a General Plan Designation of Commercial/Industrial. The project is located in the Special Development district of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan which allows uses permitted in the Commercial Industrial (EV/IC) specific plan district. The proposed warehouse use is permitted and is consistent with the General Plan designation of the site. Therefore, the project would not result in land uses that are incompatible or inconsistent with the General Plan or surrounding area.

10.b) The project does not pose an economic impact on businesses and small property owners. The proposed facility would adversely impact local businesses or property owners.

10.c) The proposed warehouse facility is to be located in an area designated for commercial and industrial uses. Adjacent development consists of warehouse facilities, commercial and other nonresidential uses. The project has been designed for compatibility with surrounding development and would not physically divide or separate an existing community.

10.d) No part of this project has the potential to create a loss in jobs available to the community.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1402 of 2362
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
PD No. 7; LM No. 8

Page 20 of 20 ends

10.e) The proposed development does not involve residential use.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

10. SCHOOLS. Would the proposal result in:
a) Creating an overcapacity in schools? 
b) The need for additional school facilities or
equipment? 
c) Land uses not consistent with or compatible
with existing educational facilities in
community? 
d) Social or academic impacts on students
resulting from school closures. 
Schools

11.a-d) Public school services within the City of Redlands are provided by the Redlands Unified School District. The project is not residential and therefore would not increase demand for local school facilities. Any potential direct impacts attributable to the Redlands Unified School District resulting from this project will be offset through the payment of state established school fees assessed at the time of building permit issuance on the newly created lot. No further additional information or evaluation is needed.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1403 of 2362
TABLE 1
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 LAND USE 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 TOTAL

RESIDENTIAL UNITS
RURAL LIVING (0.2 - 0.4 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 2.7 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 6.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 8.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 15.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HIGH DENSITY (0 - 27.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL, RESIDENTIAL UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CUMULATIVE, RESIDENTIAL UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
PROJECT RESIDENTS /1
RURAL LIVING (0.4 - 0.2 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 2.7 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 6.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 8.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 15.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HIGH DENSITY (0 - 27 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL, PROJECT RESIDENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CUMULATIVE, PROJECT RESIDENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
CUMULATIVE PROJECT ACREAGE /2
RURAL LIVING (0.4 - 0.2 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 2.7 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 6.0 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 8.0 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 15.0 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA HIGH DENSITY (0 - 27 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA CUMULATIVE, PROJECT ACREAGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA LAND NON-RESIDENTIAL ACRES, ANNUAL /3
RETAIL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
INDUSTRIAL 16.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 DEVELOPER ANNUAL TOTAL, NON-RESIDENTIAL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0

LAND NON-RESIDENTIAL ACRES, CUMULATIVE
RETAIL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA
INDUSTRIAL 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 NA OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA CUMULATIVE TOTAL, NON-RESIDENTIAL 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 NA LAND NON-RESIDENTIAL EDU'S, CUMULATIVE /4
RETAIL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA
INDUSTRIAL 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 NA OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA CUMULATIVE TOTAL, NON-RESIDENTIAL EDU'S 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 144.0 NA BUILDING NON-RESIDENTIAL SQ.FT., ANNUAL
RETAIL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
INDUSTRIAL 351,610 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 351,610
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 6,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,000 DEVELOPER ANNUAL TOTAL, NON-RESIDENTIAL 357,610 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 357,610 BUILDING NON-RESIDENTIAL SQ.FT., CUMULATIVE
RETAIL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
INDUSTRIAL 351,610 351,610 351,610 351,610 351,610 351,610 351,610 351,610 351,610 351,610 NA OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 NA CUMULATIVE TOTAL, NON-RESIDENTIAL 357,610 357,610 357,610 357,610 357,610 357,610 357,610 357,610 357,610 357,610 NA SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT.

NOTES:

1. Average number of residents per Dwelling Unit ("DU") provided by the California Department of Finance. 3. Assumes average non-residential site coverage of the following (based on the General Plan):

Residents per DU = 2.801 OTHER Retail 0.0%
Industrial 45.0%

2. Assumes residential acreage per unit of the following: Other Non-Residential 0.0% Lot Coverage Rural Living (less than 0.2 - 0.4 du/acre) NA
Very-Low-Density Residential (0 - 2.7 du/acre) NA
Low-Density Residential (0 - 6.0 du/acre) NA 4. Assumes non-residential equivalent dwelling units of the following:

Low-Medium-Density Residential (0 - 8.0 du/acre) NA EDUs per acre = 9.0 OTHER Medium-Density Residential (0 - 15.0 du/acre) NA
High Density (0 - 27.0 du/acre) NA GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUTPROJ. Sq. Ft.* F.A.R.* Projected Acreage RETAIL 8,646,200 0.30 661.63
INDUSTRIAL 10,048,400 0.40 576.70 OTHER
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 21,641,990 0.45 1,104.07
40,336,590 2,342.40
*As disclosed in the General Plan
Typical Home Size: 2,835 OTHER
Estimated Equivalency: 6.07
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1404 of 2362
TABLE 2
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

ASSESSED VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS SECURED PROPERTY TAX ASSUMPTIONS RESIDENTIAL NET APPORTIONMENT FACTORS AS A FRACTION OF 1.0% TAX RATE RURAL LIVING ASSESSED VALUE $0
VERY-LOW-DENSITY ASSESSED VALUE $0 PROPERTY TAXES PASSED THROUGH TO CITY /1 20.00% CITY LOW-DENSITY ASSESSED VALUE $0
LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY ASSESSED VALUE $0 1. Based on amount disclosed in the adopted 1998-99 budget.

MEDIUM-DENSITY ASSESSED VALUE $0
HIGH DENSITY ASSESSED VALUE $0

NON-RESIDENTIAL UNSECURED PROPERTY TAX ASSUMPTIONS
RETAIL ASSESSED VALUE $0.00
INDUSTRIAL ASSESSED VALUE $210.00 RESIDENTIAL:

OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL ASSESSED VALUE $0.00 DEVELOPER UNSECURED TAXES AS A % OF SECURED 2.75% CITY NON-RESIDENTIAL:

UNSECURED TAXES AS A % OF SECURED 10.00%
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 SECURED ASSESSED VALUE CALCULATION:

ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUES (YEARLY INCREASE)

RESIDENTIAL
RURAL LIVING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

NON-RESIDENTIAL
RETAIL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
INDUSTRIAL $73,838 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL $73,838 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL YEARLY VALUATION INCREASE: $73,838 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

CUMULATIVE ASSESSED VALUES

NON-RESIDENTIAL
RETAIL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
INDUSTRIAL $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 TOTAL CUMULATIVE ASSESSED VALUE $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 $73,838 SECURED PROPERTY TAX REVENUE CALCULATION:

CITY OF REDLANDS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 TOTAL SECURED TAX REVENUES TO CITY $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 UNSECURED PROPERTY TAX REVENUE CALCULATION:

CITY OF REDLANDS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 TOTAL UNSECURED TAX REVENUES TO CITY $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES TO CITY $162 $162 $162 $162 $162 $162 $162 $162 $162 $162 Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1405 of 2362
TABLE 3
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

RESIDENTIAL INDIRECT SALES TAX GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS BUSINESS DIRECT SALES & USE TAX GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME ASSUMPTIONS: SALES TAXES PASSED THROUGH TO CITY, APPLIED TO COSTS: /1 1.00% CITY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TURNOVER RATE 10.00% CITY MEASURE 'I' TAXES PASSED THROUGH TO TRANSIT AUTHORITY 0.00% BUS & COM PROPERTY TURNOVER RATE 5.00% WEIGHTED AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL PRICE $0 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES 0.00% TRANSFER TAX AS A % OF RESALE DOLLAR 0.11% AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE (20% DOWN) $0 DISPLACED EXISTING CITY SALES TAX 33.33% PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX PASSED THROUGH TO CITY 50.00% ANNUAL MORTGAGE PAYMENTS @ 6.50% & 30 YEARS $0 CITY PROJECT RETAIL TAXABLE SALES PER SQ. FT:

AVG. HOUSEHOLD INCOME (3:1 INCOME/PAYMENT RATIO): $0 RETAIL $0.00 RETAIL TAXABLE EXPENDITURE (% OF INCOME): 25.0% INDUSTRIAL $10.00 CITY PROJECT RESIDENTS' PURCHASES OUTSIDE PROJECT 50.0% OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.00 AND WITHIN INCORPORATED CITY:

1. Based on amount passed through to city in the adopted 1997-98 budget.

YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 SALES & USE TAX REVENUE CALCULATION (CUMULATIVE):

INDIRECT SALES TAX GENERATION
RESIDENTIAL TAXABLE EXPENDITURES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL TAXABLE PURCHASES WITHIN CITY $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 RESIDENTIAL SALES TAX GENERATION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

DIRECT SALES TAX GENERATION
RETAIL TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
INDUSTRIAL TAXABLE SALES $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SUB-TOTAL DIRECT TAXABLE SALES $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 $3,516 LESS: DISPLACED EXISTING CITY SALES TAX $1,172 $1,172 $1,172 $1,172 $1,172 $1,172 $1,172 $1,172 $1,172 $1,172 TOTAL DIRECT TAXABLE SALES $2,344 $2,344 $2,344 $2,344 $2,344 $2,344 $2,344 $2,344 $2,344 $2,344 TOTAL DIRECT SALES TAX GENERATION $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 TOTAL PROJECT SALES & USE TAX REVENUES, APPLIED TO COSTS $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 RESIDENTIAL MEASURE 'I' SALES TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NON-RESIDENTIAL MEASURE 'I' SALES TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 RESIDENTIAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NON-RESIDENTIAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROJECT SALES & USE TAX REVENUES, FOR TRANSPORTATION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX CALCULATION (CUMULATIVE):

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAXES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TRANSFER T AXES $2.03 $2.03 $2.03 $2.03 $2.03 $2.03 $2.03 $2.03 $2.03 $2.03 TOTAL ANNUAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAXES $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1406 of 2362
TABLE 4
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REVENUE FRANCHISE FEES (PER CAPITA) TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX

RESIDENTIAL NA RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL NUMBER OF AVAILABLE HOTEL ROOMS NON-RESIDENTIAL TOTAL FRANCHISE $16.71 $16.71 OCCUPANCY RATE

BUSINESS LICENSE FEES ARE CHARGED AT A RATE EQUAL AVERAGE BILLING RATE PER ROOM TO $12 FOR THE FIRST $5,000 IN GROSS SALES, PLUS $3 % PASSED THROUGH TO CITY FOR EACH ADDITIONAL $5,000 INCREMENT IN GROSS SALES. AVERAGE YEARLY OCCUPANCY REVENUES TO CITY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034

BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RURAL LIVING NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

TOTAL RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NON-RESIDENTIAL
RETAIL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
INDUSTRIAL $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2
TOTAL, BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REVENUE $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2

FRANCHISE FEE REVENUE
RESIDENTIAL FRANCHISE FEES $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL FRANCHISE FEES $2.406 $2.406 $2.406 $2.406 $2.406 $2.406 $2.406 $2.406 $2.406 $2.406 TOTAL, FRANCHISE FEE REVENUE $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2

TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE
TOTAL, TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1407 of 2362
TABLE 5
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL

OTHER REVENUE AND REVENUE SUMMARY

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
OTHER GENERAL REVENUES (PER CAPITA METHOD) /1 INCOME FROM INVESTMENTS OTHER TAXES /2 $10.86 EFFECTIVE INTEREST 2.50% OTHER
OTHER REVENUES $6.96

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NA

LIBRARY NA

POLICE DEPARTMENT NA

POLICE - ANIMAL CONTROL NA

POLICE - RECREATION NA

POLICE - SENIOR SERVICES NA

FIRE NA

PUBLIC WORKS NA
SUBTOTAL, OTHER REVENUES PER CAPITA: $17.83

1. See Appendix for calculation of per capita multipliers. For items without values, a net cost technique is being employed.

2. Other Taxes includes Public Safety Sales Tax.

YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034

PER CAPITA REVENUES

OTHER TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, OTHER TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

OTHER REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, OTHER LICENSES, PERMITS & FINES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, STATE REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

LIBRARY
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, FEDERAL REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

POLICE DEPARTMENT
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, CITY ATTORNEY $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

POLICE - ANIMAL CONTROL
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, ENGINEERING SERVICES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

POLICE - RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, FIRE DEPARTMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

POLICE - SENIOR SERVICES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, JOSLYN CENTER $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FIRE
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, LIBRARY $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PUBLIC WORKS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, PARKS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PER CAPITA REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL PER CAPITA REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PER CAPITA REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL CASE STUDY REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL CASE STUDY REVENUES $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 TOTAL CASE STUDY REVENUES $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 RESIDENTIAL REV AVAILABLE FOR INV. INCOME $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NON-RESIDENTIAL REV AVAILABLE FOR INV. INCOME $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 TOTAL REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR INVESTMENT INCOME $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 $192 RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT INCOME $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NON-RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT INCOME $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5
SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1408 of 2362
TABLE 6
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL

POLICE DEPARTMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WORKS & PER CAPITA COSTS

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL CALLS 16,562 CITY
COST PER DWELLING UNIT $295
NON-RESIDENTIAL RETAIL CALLS 8,987
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.47
NON-RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL CALLS 344
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.02
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL CALLS 7,948
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.42
MISCELLANEOUS CALLS /2 17,628
TOTAL CALLS 51,469

1. Based on Net Cost and number of calls to residential or non-residential properties.

2. Based on conversations with the Police Chief, these incidences are not related to residences or businesses in the City.

EXISTING DWELLING UNITS 25,984 CITY
EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 8,824,690
RESIDENTIAL FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS [1]
RESIDENTIAL CALLS 3,579 CITY
COST PER DWELLING UNIT $168
NON-RESIDENTIAL RETAIL CALLS 446
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.06
NON-RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL CALLS 155
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.02
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL CALLS 1,459
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.20
MISCELLANEOUS CALLS /2 1,988
TOTAL CALLS 7,627

1. Based on Net Cost and number of calls to residential or non-residential properties.

2. Based on information from Fire Chief, these incidences are not related to residences or businesses in the City.

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS /1 PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE COSTS ROADS (LANE MILES) 0.0 DEVELOPER PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PER LANE MILE /1 $5,000 CITY TRAFFIC INTERSECTIONS REQUIRING SIGNALS 0.0 STREET SWEEPING PER CURB MILE - ALL STREETS /1 $9 AGGREGATE LANDSCAPING (ACRES) 0.0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE PER INTERSECTION /1 $5,560 PARK ACREAGE (GROSS) 0.0 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PER ACRE /1 $12,500 STREET LIGHTS 0.0 PARK MAINTENANCE PER ACRE /1 $7,000
OPEN SPACE (ACRES) 0.0 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE COST PER LIGHT /1 $125 TRAILS (LINEAL MILE) 0.0 OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE PER ACRE /2 $125 STORM DRAINS (MILES) 0.0 TRAIL MAINTENANCE PER LINEAL MILE /2 $500 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE PER MILE /2 $750

1. Infrastructure should exclude privately maintained facilities.

1. Based on consultations with the City of Redlands Public Works Department.

2. Based on consultant's experience.

CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS* CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS CONTINUED CITY COUNCIL $174,090 TOTAL CITY OPERATING BUDGET* ######### CITY CLERK $285,939
CITY MANAGER $314,819 *Excludes Debt Service, Utilities and Capital Improvements.

FINANCE $605,155
CITY TREASURER $2,875,064 OVERHEAD AS A % OF OPERATING BUDGET 11.04% CITY ATTORNEY $1,159,167
TOTAL, CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS $5,414,234 OVERHEAD AS A % OF DIRECT COSTS 12.41% *Costs have been reduced to reflect department specific revenues. OVERHEAD BY DEFINITION CAUSING NO COST 0.00% OVERHEAD AS % OF DIRECT, AVERAGE 6.20%
OTHER NET COSTS (PER CAPITA METHOD) /1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $29.49
LIBRARY $28.43

1. See Appendix for calculation of per capita multipliers.

YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034

CITY DIRECT COSTS

POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL RETAIL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL $6.344 $6.344 $6.344 $6.344 $6.344 $6.344 $6.344 $6.344 $6.344 $6.344 OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $2.501 $2.501 $2.501 $2.501 $2.501 $2.501 $2.501 $2.501 $2.501 $2.501 TOTAL, POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS $8.845 $8.845 $8.845 $8.845 $8.845 $8.845 $8.845 $8.845 $8.845 $8.845

FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL RETAIL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL $7.541 $7.541 $7.541 $7.541 $7.541 $7.541 $7.541 $7.541 $7.541 $7.541 OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 TOTAL, FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS $8.752 $8.752 $8.752 $8.752 $8.752 $8.752 $8.752 $8.752 $8.752 $8.752

PUBLIC WORKS COSTS
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 STREET SWEEPING $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATION $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 PARK MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TRAIL MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TOTAL, PUBLIC WORKS COSTS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000

POLICE - HUMAN SERVICES
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TOTAL, POLICE - HUMAN SERVICES $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TOTAL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000

LIBRARY
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TOTAL, LIBRARY $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000

CITY DIRECT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 TOTAL, CITY DIRECT COSTS $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211 $1.211

CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 TOTAL, CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 $0.075 SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1409 of 2362
TABLE 7
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS DETAILED SUMMARY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 % FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 OF TOTAL

ONGOING REVENUES

SECURED PROPERTY TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 $148 74.87%

UNSECURED PROPERTY TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 7.49%

TRANSFER PROPERTY TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 1.03%

SALES TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 $23 11.88%

MEASURE 'I' SALES TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

FRANCHISE FEE REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 1.22%

BUSINESS LICENSE REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 1.07%

OTHER TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

OTHER REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

LIBRARY
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

POLICE DEPARTMENT
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

POLICE - ANIMAL CONTROL
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

POLICE - RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

POLICE - SENIOR SERVICES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
FIRE
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

PUBLIC WORKS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

INVESTMENT INCOME REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 2.44%
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 100.00% TOTAL ON-GOING REVENUES $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 $197 $197

ONGOING COSTS

POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 50.05%

FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 49.53%

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COST
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.43%

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

LIBRARY COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL COSTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL COSTS $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 100.00% TOTAL ON-GOING COSTS $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 TOTAL ANNUAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 TOTAL ANNUAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1410 of 2362
TABLE 8a
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY (Residential Only))
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034

ONGOING REVENUES
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000

ONGOING COSTS
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL COSTS $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1411 of 2362
TABLE 8b
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY (Commercial Only)
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034

ONGOING REVENUES
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505

ONGOING COSTS
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL COSTS $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1412 of 2362
TABLE 8c
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY (MIXED)
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 % FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 OF TOTAL

ONGOING REVENUES
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 0.00% TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 100.00% TOTAL ON-GOING REVENUES $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505 $197.2505

ONGOING COSTS
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL COSTS $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 0.00% TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL COSTS $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 100.00% TOTAL ON-GOING COSTS $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 $17.6723 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 TOTAL ANNUAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 $179.5782 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 TOTAL ANNUAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 11.16 Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1413 of 2362
TABLE 9
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL
SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION (SB 50)

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Capacity Acreage SBE 50 fees
SFD 0.2260 SCHOOL DIST Elementary 600 10 $5,200
MFA 0.1362 Middle School 1000 20 $5,500
DEVELOPER FEE REVENUE PER SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNIT /1 $3,113 Mobile Home 0.1068 High School 2200 50 $7,200 DEVELOPER FEE REVENUE PER MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED UNIT /2 $1,431 MIDDLE SCHOOL DEVELOPER FEE REVENUE PER MOBILE HOME /3 $1,212 SFD 0.1310 MFA 0.0574
Mobile Home 0.0548

HIGH SCHOOL
SFD 0.1690
MFA 0.0565
Mobile Home 0.0493
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 TOTAL FISCAL YEAR ($s ×1,000) end of: 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029

CITY OF REDLANDS

ANNUAL PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
SFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MFA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

STUDENT PROJECTIONS

ELEMENTARY
SFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MFA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MIDDLE SCHOOL
SFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MFA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HIGH SCHOOL
SFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MFA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ANNUAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION

ELEMENTARY
SFD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MFA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mobile Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $0

MIDDLE SCHOOL
SFD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MFA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mobile Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $0

HIGH SCHOOL
SFD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MFA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mobile Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $0

TOTAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION
SFD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MFA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mobile Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS

RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1414 of 2362

CITY OFREDLANDS

ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM

AND INITIAL STUDY
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1415 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Introduction
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1416 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Introduction
o
o
o
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1417 of 2362
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1418 of 2362
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1419 of 2362
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1420 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Introduction
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1421 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Introduction
March 26, 2024
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1422 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1423 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1424 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1425 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1426 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Environmental Impact Report
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1427 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1428 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1429 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1430 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1431 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Residential Exposure Scenario:

Worker Exposure Scenario:

School Child Exposure Scenario:

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1432 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1433 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1434 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1435 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1436 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1437 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1438 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 16California Energy Commission. https://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/Default.aspx. Accessed December 21, 2023.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1439 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1440 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1441 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1442 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1443 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1444 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1445 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1446 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1447 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form o
o
o
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1448 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1449 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1450 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1451 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1452 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1453 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1454 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1455 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1456 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1457 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form o
o
o
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1458 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1459 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1460 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1461 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1462 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1463 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1464 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1465 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1466 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1467 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1468 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1469 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1470 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1471 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1472 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1473 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1474 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1475 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1476 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1477 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 53 San Bernardino Countywide Policy Plan Draft EIR. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Figure 5.8- Severity and Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1478 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1479 of 2362
Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1480 of 2362
Initial Study for Park Ave. Warehouse project
City of Redlands, California References
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1481 of 2362
Initial Study for Park Ave. Warehouse project
City of Redlands, California References
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1482 of 2362
MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM Project: 1101 California Street Warehouse (Lot Merger No. 8; Planned Development No.7 Applicant: CRP/NPP Redlands Industrial Owner, LLC Lead Agency: City of Redlands Date: March 2024 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Implementation Timing Party Responsible for Implementation Party Responsible for Monitoring Date of Completion/Notes Biological Resources BIO-1: Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey: If construction or other Project activities are scheduled to occur during the nesting bird season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified avian biologist to ensure that active bird nests will not be disturbed or destroyed. The survey shall be completed no more than three days prior to initial ground disturbance. The nesting bird survey shall include the Project Site and adjacent areas where Project activities have the potential to affect active nests, either directly or indirectly, due to construction activity, noise, human activity, or ground disturbance. If an active nest is identified, a qualified avian biologist shall establish an appropriately sized non-disturbance buffer around the nest using flagging or staking. Construction activities shall not occur within any non-disturbance buffer zones until the nest is deemed inactive by the qualified avian biologist. If initial ground-disturbing activities are scheduled to occur during the nesting bird season, then a biological monitor shall be present during all vegetation removal activities to ensure no impacts to nesting birds occur. Prior to any ground-disturbing activities Qualified Avian Biologist City of Redlands Cultural Resources CR-1: In the event that cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. If significant pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot Prior to any ground-disturbing activities Project Proponent Archaeologist City of Redlands Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1483 of 2362
Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Implementation Timing Party Responsible for Implementation Party Responsible for Monitoring Date of Completion/Notes be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. CR-2: If human remains are discovered, work shall halt in that area until a determination can be made regarding the provenance of the human remains, and the following procedures as set forth in CEQA Section 15064.5(e), the California Public Resources Code (Sec. 5097.98), and the State Health and Safety Code (Sec. 7050.5) shall be undertaken. All work shall be directed away from the location of the discovery and any nearby area reasonably suspected of overlaying adjacent human remains until a determination can be made by the medical examiner. The medical examiner will determine if the remains are or are most likely to be of Native American origin. If human remains are determined to be Native American, the medical examiner will notify the NAHC within 24 hours. If human remains are not Native American, the medical examiner will determine the appropriate course of action with the city staff (Public Resources Code 5097.98). During all earth moving activities Project Proponent Archaeologist Project Archaeologist City of Redlands Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1484 of 2362
Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Implementation Timing Party Responsible for Implementation Party Responsible for Monitoring Date of Completion/Notes Geology and Soils GEO-1: The recommendations regarding site preparation and construction, as described in a Final Geotechnical Investigation as approved by the City Engineer, shall be incorporated into project design. Prior to issuance of grading permits Project Proponent Paleontologist Paleontologist City of Redlands GEO-2: Establish a procedure for the management of paleontological materials found on-site during project development, including the following provisions: If materials are found on-site during grading, it is required that work be halted until a qualified paleontologist evaluates the find to determine if it represents a significant paleontological resource. If the resource is determined to be significant, the paleontologist shall supervise removal of the material and determine the most appropriate archival storage of the material. Appropriate materials shall be prepared, and shall be retained within San Bernardino County if feasible. Upon discovery of paleontological resources Project Proponent Paleontological Monitor City of Redlands Tribal Cultural Resources TCR-1: Tribal Monitoring Services Agreement: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall enter into a Tribal Monitoring Services Agreement with the Morongo Band of Mission Indians (MBMI) for the Project. The Tribal Monitor shall be on-site during all ground-disturbing activities (including, but not limited to, clearing, grubbing, tree and bush removal, grading, trenching, fence post placement and removal, construction excavation, excavation for all utility and irrigation lines, and landscaping phases of any kind). The Tribal Monitor shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground-disturbing activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources. Upon discovery of any pre-contact or historic-era resources Qualified Archeologist Morongo Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department City of Redlands Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1485 of 2362
Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Implementation Timing Party Responsible for Implementation Party Responsible for Monitoring Date of Completion/Notes TCR-2: Retention of Archaeologist: Prior to any ground- disturbing activities (including, but not limited to, clearing, grubbing, tree and bush removal, grading, trenching, fence post replacement and removal, construction excavation, excavation for all utility and irrigation lines, and landscaping phases of any kind), and prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall retain a Qualified Archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Standards (SOI). The Archaeologist shall be present during all ground- disturbing activities to identify any known or suspected archaeological and/or cultural resources. The Archaeologist will conduct Cultural Resource Sensitivity Training, in conjunction with the Tribe[s] Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO), and/or designated Tribal Representative. The training session will focus on the archaeological and tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during ground-disturbing activities as well as the procedures to be followed in such an event. Upon completion of project cultural reports Qualified Archeologist City of Redlands TCR-3: Cultural Resource Management Plan: Prior to any ground-disturbing activities the project Archaeologist shall develop a Cultural Resource Management Plan (CRMP) and/or Archaeological Monitoring and Treatment Plan (AMTP) to address the details, timing, and responsibilities of all archaeological and cultural resource activities that occur on the project site. This Plan shall be written in consultation with the consulting Tribe[s] and shall include the following: approved Mitigation Measures (MM)/Conditions of Approval (COA), contact information for all pertinent MM or COA, and an overview of the project schedule. Prior to any ground-disturbing activities Qualified Archeologist City of Redlands TCR-4: Pre-Grade Meeting: The retained Qualified archeologist and Consulting Tribe[s] representative shall attend the pre-grade meeting with the grading contractors to explain and coordinate the requirements of the monitoring plan. Prior to any ground-disturbing activities Qualified Archeologist and Consulting Tribe[s] representative[s] City of Redlands Consulting Tribe[s] TCR-5: On-site Monitoring: During all ground-disturbing activities the Qualified Archaeologist and the Tribal Monitor shall be on-site full-time. The frequency of inspections shall depend on the rate of excavation, the Upon discovery of any pre-contact or historic-era resources Qualified Archeologist City of Redlands Consulting Tribe[s] Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1486 of 2362
Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Implementation Timing Party Responsible for Implementation Party Responsible for Monitoring Date of Completion/Notes materials excavated, and any discoveries of Tribal Cultural Resources as defined in California Public Resources Code Section 21074. Archaeological and Tribal Monitoring will be discontinued when the depth of grading and the soil conditions no longer retain the potential to contain cultural deposits. The Qualified Archaeologist, in consultation with the Tribal Monitor, shall be responsible for determining the duration and frequency of monitoring. TCR-6: Significant Resources: The Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Cultural Resources Department (YSMN) shall be contacted of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during project implementation and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a Cultural Resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with YSMN, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents YSMN for the remainder of the project, should YSMN elect to place a monitor on-site. Upon discovery of any pre-contact or historic-era resources Qualified Archeologist Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Cultural Resources Department City of Redlands TCR-7: Project Documents: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to YSMN. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with Upon completion of project archeological/cultur al reports Qualified Archeologist City of Redlands Consulting Tribe[s] TCR-8: Final Report: The final report[s] created as a part of the project (AMTP, isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be submitted to the Lead Agency and Consulting Tribe[s] for review and comment. After approval of all parties, the final reports are to be submitted to the Eastern Information Center, and the Consulting Tribe[s]. Upon completion of project archeological/cultur al reports Qualified Archeologist City of Redlands Consulting Tribe[s] Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1487 of 2362
From: [email protected]
To: Kevin Beery
Subject: Comment on IS/MND for Planned Development No. 7 Date: Saturday, April 27, 2024 22:10:11
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Redlands -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] We DON’T need anymore warehouses in Redlands! We need a big Community Pool and more activity centers for our youth, teens & adults!! Or how about an event venue for music and theater (like Yucaipa Performing Arts).

Seriously, almost anything that provides enrichment, cultural, or wellness benefits for our community instead of more warehouses.

Cindy and Robert Calderon
131 Kenwood Dr
Redlands 92374
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1488 of 2362
From: Vivek Gupta
To: Kevin Beery
Subject: Proposed Warehouse Project Located at 1101 California Street Date: Monday, April 29, 2024 08:47:25
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Redlands -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Hi Kevin,
I would like to understand the impact of this on the overall air quality. As it is with the growing number of warehouses and trucks coming into the area it seems the air quality is deteriorating with every passing day.

The community does not have enough entertainment and amusement center.

This project is also close to residential which might start impacting peoples health adversely.

Thanks
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1489 of 2362
From: Liz Kim
To: Kevin Beery
Subject: Warehouse/Splash
Date: Monday, April 29, 2024 10:46:50
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Redlands -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] As a homeowner in Redlands who chose Redlands as a city to reside in because of its walkability my concern is the focus on warehouse/logistics for the city.

Driving into Redlands from the East on 10 there has been a presence of smog for sometime.

San Bernardino County gets an F for pollution. We are part of SB County. What is the city doing to control the growing logistics building that is happening in Redlands because of our proximity to 10, an artery for trucking in and out of California and the abundance of land still available for growth here?
Are there plans for "green spaces"?
I'm not anti growth, just concerned that there isn't thoughtful planning around it.

Elizabeth Kim
56 N. Buena Vista St.

Redlands 92473
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1490 of 2362
From: LuAnn Benton
To: Kevin Beery
Cc: Paul Barich; Eddie Tejeda
Subject: No More Warehouses, PLEASE!
Date: Monday, April 29, 2024 13:12:29
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Redlands -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Dear Mr. Beery,
I just found out that today was the last day for public comments for the proposed 357,000 sq. ft. warehouse where Pharaoh's Last Kingdom was located.

Do we really need more warehouses?
I can't believe the City would even consider this proposal.

A few months ago the City Council requested that the residents respond to a survey to "rebrand" our City. Our current slogan is "A City that Works", what will the new slogan be? "A City that works for Developers", "A City that works for Warehouses"? In previous conversations the City Council had always discussed our precious Redlands as a destination point.

Look at us now....Destination to what? Will we have walking tours to visit all the empty warehouses?
You already know all the arguments against ANOTHER warehouse.

Increased Traffic due to all the big trucks
Air Pollution caused by the additional CO2 in the atmosphere Not conducive to the neighborhood with schools, residents, medical facilities, churches and restaurants near by
Increased road damage (10 times as much) when you compare trucks to cars Noise Pollution- the residents have no control as to who would lease this humongous warehouse
Where is the VISION for our future? Is every decision revenue based? We have to think of the future and what we are leaving to the next generation. Will they thank us for all the hard work that was done preserving our history? Or will they despise us for no vision and inviting all these out-of-town developers to come in and create another concrete jungle just like they did in Los Angeles? Please consider the consequences of the decisions that are made for our Beloved Redlands.

Sincerely,
Robert and LuAnn Benton
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1491 of 2362
From: Beth Sanders
To: Kevin Beery
Subject: NO MORE WAREHOUSES!
Date: Monday, April 29, 2024 15:11:17
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Redlands -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Please please please dump this project! We need no more warehouses in Redlands! Have some forethought and planning please. Not just for us living and working here for more than 50 years, but for our children and grandchildren. Please, no more! Enough! Beth & Jerry Sanders
11177 Opal Ave, Redlands, CA 92374
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1492 of 2362
From: Margot Bordne
To: Kevin Beery
Subject: Opposition to Distribution Warehouse in Former Splash Kingdom Date: Monday, April 29, 2024 20:11:00
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Redlands -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] To Kevin Beery:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposal to put a new warehouse in the former Splash Kingdom location. I would like to voice my strong opposition to this proposal.

San Bernardino already ranks the worst in the nation for ozone pollution in large part because of the warehouses that have already taken over our region, combined with our geography that traps this pollution against the mountains. Due to our geography that already exacerbates the impacts of pollution, we should be doing everything we can to reduce and remove pollution, instead of approving new projects that will further worsen the health of our region. This pollution is known to cause diseases and health risks such as premature birth and asthma in children, and can worsen the effects of other diseases. See more information on the risks in this article https://www.communityforwardredlands.com/san-bernardino-county-ranks-worstin-the-nation-for-ozone-pollution/ Our city council should be doing everything it can to improve the health and livability of our region, instead of approving projects that may create short term profit for a few at the expense of all of our long-term health and environment.

Thank you for taking this into consideration. I realize I am a couple of hours past the deadline but I hope you will still consider my feedback with the other opposition comments I am sure you have received. I am a busy full-time working mom who is also currently pregnant and am taking time out of my day to write you these comments because opposing this warehouse for the sake of my children is so important to me.

Thank you,
Margot
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1493 of 2362
From: Julia Lenhardt
To: Kevin Beery
Subject: Comments on environmental report for California St warehouse proposal Date: Monday, April 29, 2024 04:50:20
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Redlands -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Hello Mr. Beery,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed warehouse at 1101 California St. As a Redlands resident and climate scientist, my primary concern is with the air quality findings. I simply find it impossible to believe that yet another logistics warehouse will have no significant impact on air quality, unless it's because the air quality is so bad already that it's almost impossible to make it worse. This is highlighted in the CO hotspot analysis. According to the report, this warehouse would not generate a CO hotspot because CO is already concentrated in this region.

I think a full Environmental Impact Report should be required for all new warehouse projects; as was stated with the proposed Tennessee St project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is not enough.

Thank you,
Julia
--
Julia Lenhardt (she/her)
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1494 of 2362
393 E. Walnut Street, 5th Floor
Pasadena, CA 91188

April 29, 2024
City of Redlands
Planning Division
Kevin Beery
35 Cajon Street, Ste. 20
Redlands, CA 92373
RE: Proposed Warehouse Project Located at 1101 California Street (Planned Development No. 7)- CEQA Comments
Mr. Beery:

Please accept this letter in response to the call for comments for 1101 California Street under the provisions of CEQA.

Driveway 1 and Project Recommended Stacking Lane: The proposed project includes one entrance for all trucks on Lugonia Avenue. As proposed, the new Driveway 1 does not align with our existing driveway on Lugonia. The Traffic Study recommended the following:

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1495 of 2362
2 Due to the offset in driveway alignment, the turn of the westbound truck will conflict with the existing eastbound left turn lane into our site. This will result in roadway hazards due to conflicts from competing turning demands and queuing in the median.

Existing Use Credits:

The project site has been vacant for 4+ years. The Traffic Study does not give credit for any existing uses however the GHG Report does for mobile emissions. Please explain why one technical study gives an existing use credit but the other does not.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1496 of 2362
3 We look forward to a response from the city regarding our comments.

Sincerely,
Deborah Han
Senior Land Use Manager
Kaiser Permanente, National Shared Services Organization Cc: Fernando Avila, Jerry Yang, Georgina Garcia
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1497 of 2362
SENT VIA E-MAIL: April 17, 2024
[email protected]
Kevin Beery, Senior Planner
City of Redlands
Development Services Department
35 Cajon Street, Suite 20
Redlands, CA 92373
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Proposed
1101 California Street Warehouse Project (Proposed Project) South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) staff appreciate the opportunity to review the above-mentioned document. The City of Redlands is the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Lead Agency for the Proposed Project. To provide context, South Coast AQMD staff has provided a brief summary of the project information and prepared the following comments, which are organized by topic of concern.

South Coast AQMD Staff’s Summary of Project Information in the MND Based on the information provided in the MND, the Proposed Project consists of demolishing the remaining structures and constructing a new 357,610 square feet (sq. ft) warehouse with 47 dock doors on the western side of the warehouse building.1 The Proposed Project generates 194 daily truck trips associated with the operation activities. 2 The Proposed Project is located at 1101 California Street, Redlands.3 Based on the aerial photographs, South Coast AQMD staff found that the nearest sensitive receptor (e.g., residential) is within 750 feet south of the Proposed Project site. The construction is anticipated to occur between July 2024 through May 2025.4 South Coast AQMD Staff’s Comments on the MND
Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions (WAIRE) Program
On May 7, 2021, South Coast AQMD’s Governing Board adopted Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions (WAIRE) Program, 5and Rule 316 – Fees for Rule 2305.6 Rules 2305 and 316 are new rules that will reduce regional and local emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM), including diesel PM. These emission reductions will reduce public health impacts for communities located near warehouses 1 MND. Page 1 and 2.
2 Ibid. Page 16.
3 Ibid. Page 1.
4 Ibid. Page 14.
5 South Coast AQMD Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions (WAIRE) Program. Accessed at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xxiii/r2305.pdf. 6 South Coast AQMD Rule 316 – Fees for Rule 2305. Access at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/regiii/r316.pdf.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1498 of 2362
Kevin Beery April 17, 2024
2 from mobile sources that are associated with warehouse activities. Also, the emission reductions will help the region attain federal and state ambient air quality standards. Rule 2305 applies to owners and operators of warehouses greater than or equal to 100,000 square feet. Under Rule 2305, operators are subject to an annual WAIRE Points Compliance Obligation that is calculated based on the annual number of truck trips to the warehouse. WAIRE Points can be earned by implementing actions in a prescribed menu in Rule 2305, implementing a site-specific custom plan, or paying a mitigation fee. Warehouse owners are only required to submit limited information reports, but they can opt-in to earn Points on behalf of their tenants if they so choose because certain actions to reduce emissions may be better achieved at the warehouse development phase, for instance, the installation of solar and charging infrastructure. Rule 316 is a companion fee rule for Rule 2305 to allow South Coast AQMD to recover costs associated with Rule 2305 compliance activities. Since the Proposed Project consists of the development of a 357,610-square-foot warehouse, the Proposed Project’s warehouse owners and operators will be required to comply with Rule 2305 once the warehouse is occupied. Therefore, South Coast AQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review South Coast AQMD Rule 2305 to determine the potential WAIRE Points Compliance Obligation for future operators and explore whether additional project requirements and CEQA mitigation measures can be identified and implemented at the Proposed Project that may help future warehouse operators meet their compliance obligation. South Coast AQMD staff is available to answer questions concerning Rule 2305 implementation and compliance by phone or email at (909) 396-3140 or [email protected]. For implementation guidance documents and compliance and reporting tools, please visit South Coast AQMD’s WAIRE Program webpage7.

South Coast AQMD Rules, Permits, and Responsible Agency If the implementation of the Proposed Project would require the use of new stationary and portable sources, including but not limited to emergency generators, fire water pumps, boilers, spray booths, etc., air permits from South Coast AQMD will be required, and the role of South Coast AQMD would change from a Commenting Agency to a Responsible Agency under CEQA. In addition, if South Coast AQMD is identified as a Responsible Agency, per CEQA Guidelines Sections15086, the Lead Agency is required to consult with South Coast AQMD. In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15096 sets forth specific procedures for a Responsible Agency, including making a decision on the adequacy of the CEQA document for use as part of evaluating the applications for air permits. For these reasons, the Final MND should include a discussion about any new stationary and portable equipment requiring South Coast AQMD air permits and identify South Coast AQMD as a Responsible Agency for the Proposed Project.

The Final MND should also include calculations and analyses for construction and operation emissions for the new stationary and portable sources, as this information will also be relied upon as the basis for the permit conditions and emission limits for the air permit(s). Please contact South Coast AQMD’s Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-3385 for questions regarding what types of equipment would require air permits. For more general information on permits, please visit South Coast AQMD’s webpage at http://www.aqmd.gov/home/permits. 7 South Coast AQMD WAIRE Program. Accessed at: http://www.aqmd.gov/waire.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1499 of 2362
Kevin Beery April 17, 2024
3 Conclusion
The Lead Agency is recommended to revise the CEQA analysis to address the aforementioned comments and provide the necessary evidence to sufficiently support the conclusions reached. If the requested information and analysis are not included in the final CEQA document, either the Final MND or other type of CEQA document, the Lead Agency should provide reasons for not doing so. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21092.5(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, prior to approving the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for adoption together with any comments received during the public review process and notify each public agency when any public hearings are scheduled. Please provide South Coast AQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the adoption of the Final MND.

When responding to issues raised in the comments, detailed reasons supported by substantial evidence in the record to explain why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted must be provided. In addition, if the Lead Agency decides to adopt the Final MND, please provide South Coast AQMD with a notice of any scheduled public hearing(s).

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. South Coast AQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to address any air quality questions that may arise from this comment letter.

Please contact Danica Nguyen, Air Quality Specialist, at [email protected] should you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Sam Wang
Sam Wang
Program Supervisor, CEQA-IGR
Planning, Rule Development & Implementation
SW:DN
SBC240402-03
Control Number
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1500 of 2362

BLUM, COLLINS & HO LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

AON CENTER
707 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
SUITE 4880
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 (213) 572-
0400
April 26, 2024
Kevin Beery, Senior Planner VIA EMAIL TO:

City of Redlands, Planning Division [email protected] P.O. Box 3005
Redlands, CA 92373-1505
SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON 1101 CALIFORNIA STREET WAREHOUSE MND (SCH NO. 2024031107)
Dear Mr. Beery,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed 1101 California Street Warehouse Project. Please accept and consider these comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. Also, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance formally requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

1.0 Summary
The project proposes to construct and operate a 357,610 square-foot (sf) warehouse building consisting of 189,397 sf of warehousing space and 6,000 sf of office space on an approximately 16 acre site. The building proposes 47 truck/trailer loading dock doors, 396 passenger car parking spaces, and 0 truck/trailer parking spaces. The project is anticipated to operate 24-hours a day, 7 days per week.

2.0 Project Description
The MND does not include a floor plan, detailed site plan, building elevations, or a conceptual grading plan. The basic components of a Planning Application include a detailed site plan, floor plan, conceptual grading plan, written narrative, and detailed elevations. Additionally, the site plan provided in Figure 3 has been edited to remove pertinent information from public view. For example, it does not provide any detailed information such as parking requirements, floor area Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1501 of 2362
Kevin Beery
April 26, 2024

Page 2 ends

ratio, earthwork quantity notes, or maximum building height. There are no building elevations or grading plan included in the MND. Providing the grading plan and earthwork quantity notes is vital as the MND does not provide any information regarding soil import/export that is necessary to construct the proposed project. The quantity ofsoil import/export directly informs the necessary truck hauling trips during the grading phase of construction. An EIR must be prepared to include wholly accurate and unedited detailed project site plan, floor plan, grading plan, elevations, and project narrative for public review.

Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
III. Air Quality, VI. Energy, and VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Please refer to attachments from SWAPE for a complete technical commentary and analysis.

The MND does not include for analysis relevant environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts, including cumulative impacts from the proposed project. This is especially significant as the surrounding community is highly burdened by pollution. According to CalEnviroScreen 4.01, CalEPA’s screening tool that ranks each census tract in the state for pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability, the proposed project’s census tract (6071007800) is ranked in the 94th percentile for overall pollution burden, meaning it is among the most polluted census tracks in the state. The surrounding community bears the impact of multiple sources of pollution and is more polluted than average on several pollution indicators measured by CalEnviroScreen. For example, the project census tract ranks in the 100th percentile for ozone burden, the 57th percentile for particulate matter (PM) 2.5 burden, and the 83rd percentile for diesel PM, and 81st percentile for traffic impacts. All of these environmental factors are attributed to heavy truck activity in the area. Ozone can cause lung irritation, inflammation, and worsening of existing chronic health conditions, even at low levels of exposure2. The very small particles of diesel PM can reach deep into the lung, where they can contribute to a range of health problems.

These include irritation to the eyes, throat and nose, heart and lung disease, and lung cancer3.

The census tract ranks in the 96th percentile for drinking water impacts, which indicates that it ranks with the worst quality drinking water in the state. Poor communities are exposed to contaminants in their drinking water more often than people in other parts of the state4.

1 CalEnviroScreen 4.0 https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40 2 OEHHA Ozone Burden https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/air-quality-ozone 3 OEHHA Diesel Particulate Matter https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/diesel-particulatematter 4 OEHHA Drinking Water https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/drinking-water Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1502 of 2362
Kevin Beery
April 26, 2024

Page 3 ends

The census tract also bears more impacts from cleanup sites than 82% of the state. Chemicals in the buildings, soil, or water at cleanup sites can move into nearby communities through the air or movement of water5.

The census tract also ranks in the 97th percentile for hazardous waste facility impacts. Hazardous waste generators and facilities contribute to the contamination of air, water and soil near waste generators and facilities can harm the environment as well as people6.

Further, the census tract is a diverse community including 25% Hispanic, 14% African-American, and 11% Asian-American residents, whom are especially vulnerable to the impacts of pollution. The community has a high rate of poverty, meaning 56% of the householdsin the census tract have a total income before taxes that is less than the poverty level. Income can affect health when people cannot afford healthy living and working conditions, nutritious food and necessary medical care7. Poor communities are often located in areas with high levels of pollution8. Poverty can cause stress that weakens the immune system and causes people to become ill from pollution9.

Living in poverty is also an indication that residents may lack health insurance or access to medical care. Medical care is vital for this census tract as it ranks in the 45th percentile for incidence of cardiovascular disease.

Additionally, the census tract adjacent to the project site (6071007200 (west)) is identified as a SB 535 Disadvantaged Community 10, which is not discussed or presented for analysis in the MND. Thisindicatesthat cumulative negative impacts of development and environmental impacts in the area are disproportionately impacting these communities. The MND does not discuss that the surrounding area is a disadvantaged community and does not utilize this information in its analysis. The MND has not considered the environmental impacts in relation to the SB 535 status of the project census tract and surrounding area. The negative environmental, health, and quality of life impacts of the warehousing and logistics industry in the area have become distinctly inequitable. The severity of environmental impacts particularly on these Disadvantaged Communities must be included for analysis as part of an EIR.

5 OEHHA Cleanup Sites https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/cleanup-sites 6 OEHHA Hazardous Waste Generators and Facilities
https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/hazardous-waste-generators-and-facilities 7 OEHHA Poverty https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/poverty 8 Ibid.
9 Ibid.
10 OEHHA SB 535 Census Tracts https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/sb535 Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1503 of 2362
Kevin Beery
April 26, 2024

Page 4 ends

The State of California lists three approved compliance modeling softwares11 for non-residential buildings: CBECC-Com, EnergyPro, and IES VE. CalEEMod is not listed as an approved software. The CalEEMod modeling does not comply with the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and under-reports the project’s significant Energy impacts and fuel consumption to the public and decision makers. Since the MND did not accurately or adequately model the energy impacts in compliance with Title 24, it cannot conclude the project will generate less than significant impacts and a finding of significance must be made. An EIR with modeling using one of the approved software types must be prepared and circulated for public review in order to adequately analyze the project’s significant environmental impacts. This is vital as the MND utilizes CalEEMod as a source in its methodology and analysis, which is clearly not an approved software.

XI. Land Use and Planning
The MND does not discuss or analyze the project’s compliance with the General Plan’s Land Use Buildout Scenario. Table ES-1: Non-Residential Buildout (2035) within the General Plan EIR12 projected new development of 1,246,376 s.f. of light industrial uses and 1,246 associated new jobs.

The MND does not provide any information or analysis on the buildout conditions of the General Plan. The MND has not provided evidence that the growth generated by the proposed project was anticipated by the General Plan, RTP/SCS, or AQMP. An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since General Plan adoption and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the project will exceed the General Plan buildout scenarios. For example, other recent industrial projects13 such as 301 Tennessee Street Warehouse (197,397 s.f.; 166 employees), Nevada Street Warehouse (89,430 s.f.; 75 employees), Kansas St. & Park Ave. Warehouse (83,875 s.f.; 71 employees), 1980 Park Ave.

Warehouse (48,079 s.f.; 41 employees), Mtn. View. & 10 Freeway Warehouse (420,937 s.f.; 353 employees), and New Jersey Street Warehouse (179,400 s.f.; 151 employees) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 1,327 employees and 1,561,828 square feet of light industrial space. This exceeds the City’s projected light industrial growth forecast through 2035 by 25% and exceeds the quantity jobs associated with projected light industrial development through 2035 by 6% and is accounted for by only eight recent industrial projects. These totals increase exponentially when other light industrial development approved, submitted, or “in the

11 California Energy Commission 2022 Energy Code Compliance Software https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2022- building-energy-efficiency-1
12 Redlands General Plan EIR https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/redlands_deir_compiled_lo_071917_0.pdf?1554321669 13 City of Redlands Major Project List https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/major_projects_list_2q_2023_-_5.22.2023.pdf Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1504 of 2362
Kevin Beery
April 26, 2024

Page 5 ends

pipeline” since General Plan adoption are added to the total. An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on this topic.

Additionally, the MND does not provide any consistency analysis with SCAG’s 2020-2045 Connect SoCal RTP/SCS. Due to errors in modeling and modeling without supporting evidence, as noted throughout this comment letter and attachments, the proposed project has significant potential for inconsistency with Goal 5 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality, Goal 6 to support healthy and equitable communities, and Goal 7 to adapt to a changing climate. An EIR must be prepared to include revised, accurate modeling and a consistency analysis with all goals of the RTP/SCS.

XIV. Population and Housing
The MND utilizes uncertain language and does not provide any meaningful analysis or supporting evidence to substantiate the conclusion that there will be no significant impact to population and housing. The MND does not provide any geographic or demographic information regarding the available workforce, such as whether the unemployed workforce is interested in or qualified for work in the industrial sector. Relying upon the workforce of the greater Inland Empire region will serve to increase project generated service population VMT and increase VMT impacts.

The MND also relies upon the statement that the project “is an allowable use within the EV/SD zoning district,” and therefore consistent with the General Plan to conclude that there will be less than significant impacts. However, as stated above, the MND has not provided any meaningful evidence to support this claim. The MND does not discuss or analyze the project’s compliance with the General Plan’s Land Use Buildout Scenario. Table ES-1: Non-Residential Buildout (2035) within the General Plan EIR14 projected new development of 1,246,376 s.f. of light industrial uses and 1,246 associated new jobs. The MND does not provide any information or analysis on the buildout conditions of the General Plan. The MND has not provided evidence that the growth generated by the proposed project was anticipated by the General Plan, RTP/SCS, or AQMP. An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since General Plan adoption and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the project will exceed the General Plan buildout scenarios and associated employment projections.

Additionally, the MND does not provide any meaningful information or discussion regarding the construction employees needed for the project. An EIR must be prepared to include a quantified

14 Redlands General Plan EIR https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/redlands_deir_compiled_lo_071917_0.pdf?1554321669 Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1505 of 2362
Kevin Beery
April 26, 2024

Page 6 ends

construction worker analysisincluding geographic locations of qualified available workersin order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

SCAG’s Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast15 states that the City will add 13,700 jobs between 2016 - 2045. Utilizing the MND’s calculation of 312 employees, the project represents 2.2% of the City’s employment growth from 2016 - 2045. A single project accounting for this amount of growth over 29 years represents a significant amount of growth. An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since 2016 and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the project will exceed SCAG’s employment and/or population growth forecast and the General Plan’s growth forecasts. For example, other recent industrial projects16 such as Iowa Street Warehouse (185,100 s.f.; 158 employees), Nevada Street Warehouse (89,430 s.f.; 75 employees), Kansas St. & Park Ave.

Warehouse (83,875 s.f.; 71 employees), 1980 Park Ave. Warehouse (48,079 s.f.; 41 employees), Mtn. View. & 10 Freeway Warehouse (420,937 s.f.; 353 employees), New Jersey Street Warehouse (179,400 s.f.; 151 employees), and 301 Tennessee Street Warehouse (197,397 s.f.; 166 employees) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 1,327 employees, which is 9.6% of the City’s SCAG employment growth forecast over 29 years accounted for by only eight recent industrial projects. This number increases exponentially when the City’s commercial development activity is added to the calculation. An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on this topic.

4.16 Transportation
The VMT analysis has exempted the project from performing a project-specific VMT analysis because the City’s VMT Guidelines exempt warehousing projects that are 463,600 square feet or less in size because it is presumed that they generate less than 3,000 MTCO2e annually17. The MND is misleading to the public and decision makers in stating that the project qualifies for the exemption because it meets the size threshold requirement, but it does not meet the Guidelines presumption that it generates less than 3,000 MTCO2e annually. Table 6: Project GHG Emissions within the MND demonstrates that the project will generate 3,534.58 MTCO2e annually.

Applying the exemption to the proposed project is not consistent with the City’s VMT Guidelines and a project-specific quantified VMT analysis must be prepared as part of an EIR.

15 SCAG Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast adopted September 3, 2020 https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and-growthforecast.pdf?1606001579 16 City of Redlands Major Project List https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/major_projects_list_1q_2023_-_2.15.2023.pdf 17 City of Redlands. CEQA Assessment VMT Analysis Guidelines https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/redlands_vmt_analysis_guidelines.pdf Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1506 of 2362
Kevin Beery
April 26, 2024

Page 7 ends

Additionally, the MND’s erroneous VMT exemption does not act in accordance with or further the goals of SB 743 and the State’s GHG reduction goals. The actual VMT generated by project operations (service population and operational truck/trailer/delivery van activity) is not consistent with the significance threshold and legislative intent of SB 743 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing VMT. The operational nature of industrial/warehouse uses involves high rates of truck/trailer/delivery van VMT due to traveling from large import hubs to regional distribution centers to smaller industrial parks and then to their final delivery destinations. Once employees arrive at work at the proposed project, they will conduct their jobs by driving delivery vans across the region as part of the daily operations as a warehouse, which will drastically increase projectgenerated VMT. The project’s truck/trailer and delivery van activity is unable to utilize public transit or active transportation and it is misleading to the public and decision makers to exclude this activity from VMT analysis. The project’s actual VMT generated by project operations (service population and operational truck/trailer/delivery van activity) is not consistent with the significance threshold and legislative intent of SB 743 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing VMT. An EIR must be prepared to reflect a project-specific quantified VMT analysis that includes all truck/trailer and delivery van activity in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

The MND has not adequately analyzed the project’s potential to substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses; or the project’s potential to result in inadequate emergency access. Exhibit 1-5: Truck Access within Appendix B depicts the truck turning template at the intersection of the project driveway and Lugonia Avenue separately for each truck entering and exiting the site. This is because there is clearly not adequate maneuvering area within the proposed 40 foot driveway area. The truck turning template on Figure 3: Site Plan in the MND depicts trucks turning simultaneously here, and there are overlapping lines for the trucks entering the site from both east and westbound Lugonia. This demonstrates that a truck cannot be queued onsite while another attempts to enter or they will collide.

Further, the Site Plan depicts further conflicts between passenger cars and trucks. Passenger car parking spaces are adjacent to truck court. The modeling for trucks turning into the loading docks show overlap with the edge of the parking stalls, meaning that there is not adequate maneuvering space within the truck court. These parking stalls that may be in use at any time and further restrict truck/trailer movement. There are also no exhibits depicting emergency vehicle access. Deferring this environmental analysis required by CEQA to the construction permitting phase is improper mitigation and does not comply with CEQA’s requirement for meaningful disclosure and adequate Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1507 of 2362
Kevin Beery
April 26, 2024

Page 8 ends

informational documents. An EIR must be prepared for the proposed project with this analysis in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

Additionally, the MND has not provided any analysis of the available horizontal and vertical sight distance at the intersection of the project driveways and adjacent streets. Sight distance is the continuous length of street ahead visible to the driver. At unsignalized intersections, corner sight distance must provide a substantially clear line of sight between the driver of the vehicle waiting on the minor road (driveway) and the driver of an approaching vehicle. An EIR must be prepared with this analysis based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Stopping Sight Distance requirements.

4.19 Mandatory Findings of Significance
An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis discussion here to demonstrate the impact of the proposed project in a cumulative setting. The MND does not discuss or analyze the project’s compliance with the General Plan’s Land Use Buildout Scenario. Table ES-1: NonResidential Buildout (2035) within the General Plan EIR 18 projected new development of 1,246,376 s.f. of light industrial uses and 1,246 associated new jobs. The MND does not provide any information or analysis on the buildout conditions of the General Plan. The recent projects discussed above combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 1,327 employees and 1,561,828 square feet of light industrial space. This exceeds the City’s projected light industrial growth forecast through 2035 by 25% and exceeds the quantity jobs associated with projected light industrial development through 2035 by 6% and is accounted for by only eight recent industrial projects. These totals increase exponentially when other light industrial development approved, submitted, or “in the pipeline” since General Plan adoption are added to the total. An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on this topic.

SCAG’s Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast states that the City will add 13,700 jobs between 2016 - 2045. Utilizing the MND’s calculation of 312 employees, the project represents 2.2% of the City’s employment growth from 2016 - 2045. A single project accounting for this amount of growth over 29 years represents a significant amount of growth. The MND has not provided evidence that the growth generated by the proposed project was anticipated by the General Plan, RTP/SCS, or AQMP.

18 Redlands General Plan EIR https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/redlands_deir_compiled_lo_071917_0.pdf?1554321669 Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1508 of 2362
Kevin Beery
April 26, 2024

Page 9 ends

An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since General Plan adoption and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the project will exceed the General Plan buildout scenarios and/or SCAG growth forecasts. For example, other recent industrial projects19 such as Iowa Street Warehouse (185,100 s.f.; 158 employees), Nevada Street Warehouse (89,430 s.f.; 75 employees), Kansas St. & Park Ave. Warehouse (83,875 s.f.; 71 employees), 1980 Park Ave. Warehouse (48,079 s.f.; 41 employees), Mtn. View. & 10 Freeway Warehouse (420,937 s.f.; 353 employees), New Jersey Street Warehouse (179,400 s.f.; 151 employees) and and 301 Tennessee Street Warehouse (197,397 s.f.; 166 employees) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 1,327 employees, which is 9.6% of the City’s SCAG employment growth forecast over 29 years accounted for by only eight recent industrial projects. This number increases exponentially when the City’s commercial development activity is added to the calculation. An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on this topic.

Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the MND is flawed and an EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

Sincerely,
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
Attachment: SWAPE Analysis

19 City of Redlands Major Project List https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/major_projects_list_1q_2023_-_2.15.2023.pdf Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1509 of 2362
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
April 24, 2024
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 4880
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on the 1101 California Street Warehouse Project (SCH No. 2024031107) Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the March 2024 Checklist for the 1101 California Street Warehouse (“Project”) located in the City of Redlands (“City”). The Project proposes to construct 357,610-square-feet (“SF”) of industrial space and 6,000-SF of office space, as well as 396 parking spaces on the 16-acre site.

Our review concludes that the Checklist fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project may be underestimated and inadequately addressed. A full CEQA analysis should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the project may have on the environment.

Air Quality
Failure to Provide Complete CalEEMod Output Files
Land use development projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) typically evaluate air quality impacts and calculate potential criteria air pollutant emissions using the California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”). 1 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project-specific values, but CEQA requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence. Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project’s 1 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1510 of 2362
2 construction and operational emissions are calculated, and “output files” are generated. These output files disclose to the reader what parameters are used in calculating the Project’s air pollutant emissions and demonstrate which default values are changed. Justifications are provided for the selected values.

According to the Air Quality Impact Analysis (“AQIA”), included as Appendix A to the Checklist, CalEEMod Version 2022.1 is relied upon to estimate Project emissions (p. 14). However, this poses a problem, as the currently available version of CalEEMod 2022.1 is described as a “soft release” which fails to provide complete output files.2 Specifically, the “User Changes to Default Data” table no longer provides the quantitative counterparts to the changes to the default values (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 153, 209, 245):

However, previous CalEEMod Versions, such as 2020.4.0, include the specific numeric changes to the model’s default values (see example excerpt below):

The output files associated with CalEEMod Version 2022.1 fail to present the exact parameters used to calculate Project emissions. To remedy this issue, the Checklist should have provided access to the model’s “.JSON” output files, which allow third parties to review the model’s revised input parameters.3 Without access to the complete output files, including the specific numeric changes to the default values, we cannot verify that the Checklist’s air modeling and subsequent analysis is an accurate reflection of the proposed Project. As a result, a full CEQA analysis should be prepared to include an 2 “CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model Soft Release.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), 2022, available at: https://caleemod.com/. 3 “Video Tutorials for CalEEMod Version 2022.1.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2022, available at: https://www.caleemod.com/tutorials.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1511 of 2362
3 updated air quality analysis that correctly provides the complete output files for CalEEMod Version 2022.1, or includes an updated air model using an older release of CalEEMod.4 Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions As previously discussed, the Checklist relies on CalEEMod Version 2022.1 to estimate the Project’s air quality emissions and fails to provide the complete output files required to adequately evaluate model’s analysis (p. 14). Regardless, when reviewing the Project’s CalEEMod output files, provided in Appendix A and the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (“GHG Analysis”), included as Appendix F to the Checklist, we were able to identify several model inputs that are inconsistent with information disclosed in the Checklist.

The Project’s construction and operational emissions may consequently be underestimated. A full CEQA analysis should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality.

Failure to Consider Potential Cold Storage Requirements Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “15517 - 1101 California (Construction)” and “15517 - 1101 California (Operations)” models include 286,088-SF of the “Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail” land use (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 162, 217; Appendix F, pp. 7, 110, 165).

As demonstrated above, the models do not include any refrigerated warehouse space whatsoever. This may be incorrect, as the Checklist does not mention potential tenants whatsoever.

As future site tenants are unknown, the proposed warehouse may require cold storage for operation. As discussed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”), “CEQA requires the use of ‘conservative analyses to afford ‘fullest possible protection of the environment.’”5 The Checklist must provide substantial evidence for not including any of the warehouse as cold storage space. Otherwise, 4 “CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/download-model. 5 “Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage” Presentation. SCAQMD Inland Empire Logistics Council, June 2014, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-triprate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/final-ielc_6-19-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1512 of 2362
4 an updated model should be prepared to include the entire warehouse land use as refrigerated to account for the additional emissions that refrigeration requirements may generate.

This presents an issue, as refrigerated warehouses release more criteria air pollutant and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions when compared to unrefrigerated land uses for three reasons. First, warehouses equipped with cold storage, such as refrigerators and freezers, are known to consume more energy when compared to warehouses without cold storage.6 Second, warehouses equipped with cold storage typically require refrigerated trucks, which are known to idle for much longer when compared to unrefrigerated hauling trucks.7 Lastly, according to a July 2014 Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage presentation prepared by the SCAQMD hauling trucks that require refrigeration result in greater truck trip rates when compared to non-refrigerated hauling trucks.8

By failing to account for any potential cold storage requirements, the models may underestimate the Project’s operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. A full CEQA analysis should be prepared to account for the possibility of additional refrigerated warehouse needs by the Project’s future tenants.

Underestimated Saturday and Sunday Operational Vehicle Trip Rates According to the Traffic Analysis, included as Appendix B to the Checklist, the proposed Project is expected to generate approximately 842 daily operational vehicle trips (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, p. 37):
6 “Warehouses.” Business Energy Advisor, available at: https://ouc.bizenergyadvisor.com/article/warehouses. 7 “Estimation of Fuel Use by Idling Commercial Trucks.” Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, January 2006, p. 8, available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245561735_Estimation_of_Fuel_Use_by_Idling_Commercial_Trucks. 8 “Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage” Presentation. SCAQMD Mobile Source Committee, July 2014, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip-ratestudy-for-air-quality-analysis/finaltrucktripstudymsc072514.pdf?sfvrsn=2, p. 7, 9.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1513 of 2362
5 The Project’s models should accurately reflect the above-mentioned operational daily vehicle trip rates.

However, review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “15517 - 1101 California (Operations)” model only includes a total of approximately 427.4 Saturday9 and 403.9 Sunday10 vehicle trips (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 196, 197, 235; Appendix F, pp. 183, 145). 9 Calculated: Total Saturday Warehouse Operations Vehicle Trips (15.2 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail trips +

16.2 Industrial Park trips + 396 User Defined Industrial trips) = 427.4 Total Saturday Vehicle Trips. 10 Calculated: Total Sunday Warehouse Operations Vehicle Trips (6.01 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail trips +

15.9 Industrial Park trips + 382 User Defined Industrial trips) = 403.9 Total Sunday Vehicle Trips.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1514 of 2362
6 The Saturday and Sunday trips are underestimated by a total of approximately 414.6 trips11 and 438.1 trips,12 respectively. As such, the trip rates input into the model are underestimated and inconsistent with the information provided by the Checklist and associated documents.

These inconsistencies present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the operational vehicle trip rates to calculate the emissions associated with the operational on-road vehicles.13 By including underestimated Saturday and Sunday operational vehicle trips, the model underestimates the Project’s mobile-source operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural Coating Emission Factors Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “15517 - 1101 California (Construction)” and “15517 - 1101 California (Operations)” models include changes to the default architectural coating emission factors (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 153, 209, 245; Appendix F, pp. 101, 157, 193):

As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.14 As demonstrated above in the “User Changes to Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is:
11 Calculated: 842 proposed vehicle trips – 427.4 modeled vehicle trips = 414.6 vehicle trips underestimated. 12 Calculated: 842 proposed vehicle trips – 403.9 modeled vehicle trips = 438.1 vehicle trips underestimated. 13 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 36. 14 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1515 of 2362
7 “SCAQMD Rule 1113” (Appendix A, pp. 153, 209, 245; Appendix F, pp. pp. 101, 157, 193).

Furthermore, the Project relies on the Fontana General Plan Update ("Fontana GP"), which includes the SCAQMD Rule 1113 concerning architectural coating values as a formal mitigation measure:
“MM-AQ-11 All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Specifically, the following measures shall be implemented, as feasible: Use coatings and solvents with a VOC content lower than that required under AQMD Rule 1113” (Fontana GP, pp. 89)
However, the models’ reductions to the architectural coating emission factors remain unsubstantiated for two reasons.

First, we cannot verify the accuracy of the revised architectural coating emission factors based on SCAQMD Rule 1113 alone. The SCAQMD Rule 1113 Table of Standards provides the required volatile organic compound (“VOC”) limits (grams of VOC per liter of coating) for 57 different coating categories.15 The VOC limits for each coating varies from a minimum value of 50 g/L to a maximum value of 730 g/L. As such, we cannot verify that SCAQMD Rule 1113 substantiates reductions to the default coating values without more information regarding what category of coating will be used. As the Checklist fails to explicitly require the use of a specific type of coating which would adhere to a specific VOC limit, we are unable to verify the models’ revised coating emission factors.

Second, as previously discussed, the output files for CalEEMod 2022.1 do not present the numeric changes to any model defaults. Upon further review of the output files, Table 5.5 contains the only mention of architectural coatings (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 145; Appendix F, pp. 93):

However, as demonstrated above, Table 5.5 only provides the square footage of area to be coated.

Since the output files fail to demonstrate the architectural coating emission factors that the model relies on, we cannot verify that the values included in the model are accurate. As previously stated, the Checklist should have provided access to the model’s “.JSON” output files, which allow third parties to review the model’s revised input parameters.16
These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the architectural coating emission factors to calculate the Project’s reactive VOC emissions.17 By including unsubstantiated reductions to 15 “SCAQMD Rule 1113 Advisory Notice.” SCAQMD, February 2016, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf?sfvrsn=24, p. 1113-14, Table of Standards

1. 16 “Video Tutorials for CalEEMod Version 2022.1.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2022, available at: https://www.caleemod.com/tutorials. 17 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 35, 40.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1516 of 2362
8 the default architectural coating emission factors, the model may underestimate the Project’s construction-related VOC emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Changes to Operational Fleet Mix Values Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “15517 - 1101 California (Operations)” model includes changes to the default operational vehicle fleet mix percentages (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 209, 245; Appendix F, pp. 157, 193).

As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.18 As demonstrated above in the “User Changes to Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is:
“Passenger Car Mix estimated based on CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, MCY). Truck Fleet Mix based on 2, 3 and 4 axle trucks” (Appendix A, pp. 209, 241; Appendix F, pp. 157, 193).

However, these changes remain unsubstantiated. As previously discussed, the output files for CalEEMod 2022.1 do not present the numeric changes to any model defaults. Upon further review of the output files, the model’s fleet mix percentages are not provided whatsoever. Until the Checklist verifies that the model includes the correct breakdown of every vehicle type that will access the Project site during operations, we cannot verify that the values included in the model are accurate.19 These unsubstantiated changes present an issue, as CalEEMod uses operational vehicle fleet mix percentages to calculate the Project’s operational emissions associated with on-road vehicles.20 By including several unsubstantiated changes to the default operational vehicle fleet mix percentages, the 18 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14. 19 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 38. 20 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 36.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1517 of 2362
9 model may underestimate the Project’s mobile-source operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

SWAPE’s Air Model Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact In an effort to quantitatively estimate the Project’s construction-related and operational emissions, we used the CalEEModVersion 2020.4.0, as well as Project-specific information provided by the Checklist.

CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type.

Our model included 286,088-SF of “Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail” land use, 71,522-SF of “Industrial Park” land use, 401 spaces of “Parking lot” land use, and 6.83-acres of “Other Asphalt Surfaces”. our updated model, we included the correct Saturday and Sunday operational vehicle trip rates; we also omitted the unsubstantiated changes to the architectural coating emission factors and operational fleet mix values. All other values are consistent with the Checklist’s model. 21 Our updated analysis estimates that the VOC emissions associated with Project construction exceed the applicable SCAQMD threshold of 75 pounds per day (“lbs/day”), as referenced by the Checklist (p. 15) (see table below).
22 SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Checklist
Construction
ROG
(lbs/day)
Checklist 63.51
SWAPE 114.6
% Increase 80.3%
SCAQMD Threshold 75.0
Exceeds? Yes
As demonstrated above, construction-related VOC emissions, as estimated by SWAPE, increase by approximately 80.3% and exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold. Our updated modeling demonstrates that the Project would result in a potentially significant air quality impact that was not previously identified or addressed by the Checklist. As a result, a full CEQA analysis should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality impacts that the Project may have on the environment.
21 See Attachment B for CalEEMod model. 22 “South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.” SCAQMD, April 2019, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/south-coast-aqmd-air-quality-significancethresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=25.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1518 of 2362
10 Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The Checklist concludes that the proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant health risk impact based on a quantified construction and operational HRA, as detailed the Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment (“HRA Report”), provided as Appendix C to the Checklist. Specifically, the HRA Report estimates that the maximum cancer risk posed to nearby, existing residential sensitive receptors associated with construction and operation would be 0.02 in one million, which would not exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one million (p. 4, Table ES-3).

However, the Checklist’s evaluation of the Project’s potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for two reasons.

First, the Checklist’s HRAs are unreliable, as they rely upon emissions estimates from a flawed air model, as discussed above in the section titled “Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions.” The HRAs are consequently based on potentially underestimated diesel particulate matter concentrations to calculate the health risk associated with Project construction. As a result, the Checklist’s HRAs and resulting cancer risk should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Second, the Checklist’s operational HRA underestimates the Fraction of Time At Home (“FAH”) values for the third trimester, infant, and child receptors. Specifically, the HRA Report utilizes an FAH value of

0.85 for the third trimester (age -0.25 to 0) and infant (age 0 to 2) receptors, and an FAH value of 0.72 for the child receptors (age 2 to 16) (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 249).

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1519 of 2362
11 However, the FAH values used for the third trimester, infant, and childhood receptors are incorrect, as SCAQMD guidance clearly states:
“For Tiers 1, 2, and 3 screening purposes, the FAH is assumed to be 1 for ages third trimester to

16. As a default, children are assumed to attend a daycare or school in close proximity to their home and no discount should be taken for time spent outside of the area affected by the facility’s emissions. People older than age 16 are assumed to spend only 73 percent of their time at home.”23
Per SCAQMD guidance, the HRA Report should have used an FAH of 1 for the third trimester, infant, and child receptors. By relying on incorrect FAH values, the Checklist underestimates the cancer risk posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of the Project operation. An updated HRA should be prepared that accurately accounts for FAH values, and consequently assesses the health risk impacts the Project poses to nearby sensitive receptors.

Greenhouse Gas
Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The Checklist estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,305.7 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year (“MT CO2e/year”) (see excerpt below) (p. 32, Table 6). 23 “Risk Assessment Procedures.” SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures_2017_080717.pdf, p. 7.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1520 of 2362
12 The Checklist concludes:
“As such, the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended numeric threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/yr. Therefore, project related emissions would not have a potential significant direct or indirect impact on GHG and climate change” (p. 32).

However, the Checklist’s analysis, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for three reasons:
(1) The Checklist’s quantitative analysis relies upon a flawed air model; (2) The Checklist’s quantitative analysis relies upon an outdated threshold; (3) The Checklist’s unsubstantiated air model indicates a potentially significant impact; 1) Incorrect and Unsubstantiated Quantitative Analysis of Emissions As previously stated, the Checklist estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,305.7 MT CO2e/year (Appendix F, p. 32, Table 6). However, the Checklist’s quantitative analysis is unsubstantiated. As previously discussed, when reviewing the Project’s CalEEMod models, provided in the AQIA, we found that several of the values inputted into the models are not consistent with information disclosed in the Checklist. As a result, the models may underestimate the Project’s emissions, and the Checklist’s quantitative analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. A full CEQA analysis should be prepared that adequately assesses the potential GHG impacts that construction and operation of the proposed Project may have on the environment. 2) Incorrect Reliance on an Outdated Quantitative GHG Threshold As previously stated, the Checklist estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,305.7 MT CO2e/year, which would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10,000 MT CO2e/year (Appendix F, p. 49). However, the guidance that provided the 10,000 MT CO2e/year threshold, the SCAQMD’s 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was developed when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as “AB 32”, Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1521 of 2362
13 was the governing statute for GHG reductions in California. AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.24 Furthermore, AEP guidance states:
“[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be revised based on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and reduction potentials out to the next GHG reduction milestone.”25
As it is currently March 2024, thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed Project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. As such, the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 10,000 MT CO2e/year is outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the Checklist’s lessthan-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Instead, we recommend that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 service population efficiency target of 3.0 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per service population per year (“MT CO2e/SP/year”), which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets.26
3) Failure to Identify a Potentially Significant GHG Impact In an effort to quantitatively evaluate the Project’s GHG emissions, we compared the Project’s GHG emissions, as estimated by the GHG Analysis, to the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year. When applying this threshold, the Project’s incorrect and unsubstantiated air model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact.

As previously stated, the Checklist estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,305.7MT CO2e/year (p. 32, Table 6). According to CAPCOA’s CEQA & Climate Change report, a service population (“SP”) is defined as “the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project.”27 According to the Checklist, the project would support approximately 312 employees (p. 47). As the project is not expected to support any residential land uses, we estimate an SP of 312 people. When dividing the Project’s net annual GHG emissions, as estimated by the Checklist, by an SP of 312 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 4.18 MT CO2e/SP/year (see table below).28
24 “Health & Safety Code 38550.” California State Legislature, January 2007, available at:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=38550. 25 “Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California.” Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), October 2016, available at:
https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016_Final_White_Paper.pdf, p. 39. 26 “Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15.” SCAQMD, September 2010, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqasignificance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 27 “CEQA & Climate Change.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), January 2008, available at:
https://www.airquality.org/LandUseTransportation/Documents/GHGThresholdsJustificationSept2014.pdf, p. 71-

72. 28 Calculated: (1,305.7 MT CO2e/year) / (312 service population) = (4.18 MT CO2e/SP/year).

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1522 of 2362
14 Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Annual Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 1,305.7
Service Population 312
Service Population Efficiency (MT CO2e/SP/year) 4.18
SCAQMD 2035 Target 3.0
Exceeds? Yes
As demonstrated above, the Project’s service population efficiency value exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, indicating a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by the Checklist. As a result, the Checklist’s less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. A full CEQA analysis should be prepared, including an updated GHG analysis and incorporating additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions to less-than-significant levels.

Mitigation
Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant air quality, health risk, and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. In an effort to reduce emissions, the Project should consider the implementation of the following mitigation measures found in the California DOJ Warehouse Project Best Practices document.29
• Requiring off-road construction equipment to be hybrid electric-diesel or zero emission, where available, and all diesel-fueled off-road construction equipment to be equipped with CARB Tier IV-compliant engines or better, and including this requirement in applicable bid documents, purchase orders, and contracts, with successful contractors demonstrating the ability to supply the compliant construction equipment for use prior to any ground-disturbing and construction activities.
• Prohibiting off-road diesel-powered equipment from being in the “on” position for more than 10 hours per day.
• Using electric-powered hand tools, forklifts, and pressure washers, and providing electrical hook ups to the power grid rather than use of diesel-fueled generators to supply their power. • Designating an area in the construction site where electric-powered construction vehicles and equipment can charge.
• Limiting the amount of daily grading disturbance area. • Prohibiting grading on days with an Air Quality Index forecast of greater than 100 for particulates or ozone for the project area.
29 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, September 2022, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 8 – 10.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1523 of 2362
15 • Forbidding idling of heavy equipment for more than three minutes. • Keeping onsite and furnishing to the lead agency or other regulators upon request, all equipment maintenance records and data sheets, including design specifications and emission control tier classifications.
• Conducting an on-site inspection to verify compliance with construction mitigation and to identify other opportunities to further reduce construction impacts. • Using paints, architectural coatings, and industrial maintenance coatings that have volatile organic compound levels of less than 10 g/L.
• Providing information on transit and ridesharing programs and services to construction employees.
• Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations for construction employees.
• Requiring all heavy-duty vehicles engaged in drayage to or from the project site to be zeroemission beginning in 2030. • Requiring all on-site motorized operational equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be zero-emission with the necessary charging or fueling stations provided. • Requiring tenants to use zero-emission light- and medium-duty vehicles as part of business operations.
• Forbidding trucks from idling for more than three minutes and requiring operators to turn off engines when not in use.
• Posting both interior- and exterior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the local air district, and the building manager.
• Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation capacity that is equal to or greater than the building’s projected energy needs, including all electrical chargers.
• Designing all project building roofs to accommodate the maximum future coverage of solar panels and installing the maximum solar power generation capacity feasible. • Constructing zero-emission truck charging/fueling stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the project.
• Running conduit to designated locations for future electric truck charging stations. • Unless the owner of the facility records a covenant on the title of the underlying property ensuring that the property cannot be used to provide refrigerated warehouse space, constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrigeration units at every dock door and requiring truck operators with transport refrigeration units to use the electric plugs when at loading docks.
• Oversizing electrical rooms by 25 percent or providing a secondary electrical room to accommodate future expansion of electric vehicle charging capability. • Constructing and maintaining electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of employee parking spaces (for example, requiring at least 10% of all employee parking Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1524 of 2362
16 spaces to be equipped with electric vehicle charging stations of at least Level 2 charging performance)
• Running conduit to an additional proportion of employee parking spaces for a future increase in the number of electric light-duty charging stations.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, air filtration systems at sensitive receptors within a certain radius of facility for the life of the project.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, an air monitoring station proximate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the project, and making the resulting data publicly available in real time. While air monitoring does not mitigate the air quality or greenhouse gas impacts of a facility, it nonetheless benefits the affected community by providing information that can be used to improve air quality or avoid exposure to unhealthy air.
• Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel. • Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks. • Requiring operators to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages singleoccupancy vehicle trips and provides financial incentives for alternate modes of transportation, including carpooling, public transit, and biking.
• Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking. • Designing to LEED green building certification standards. • Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations. • Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route. • Improving and maintaining vegetation and tree canopy for residents in and around the project area.
• Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses. Also require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request. • Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay program, and requiring tenants who own, operate, or hire trucking carriers with more than 100 trucks to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers.
• Providing tenants with information on incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and Voucher Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets.

These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation.

A full CEQA analysis should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include updated air quality, health risk, and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1525 of 2362
17 implemented to reduce emissions to the maximum extent feasible. The full CEQA analysis should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s potentially significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: SWAPE's CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment B: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment C: Paul Rosenfeld CV
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1526 of 2362
15517 - 1101 California
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Land Use - See comment on: "Failure to Consider Potential Cold Storage Requirements".

Construction Phase - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with Checklist's model.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Industrial Park 71.50 1000sqft 1.64 71,522.00 0
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 286.00 1000sqft 6.57 286,088.00 0 User Defined Industrial 358.00 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 6.83 Acre 6.83 0.00 0
Parking Lot 401.00 Space 3.61 0.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Operational Year 2026
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
691.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Attachment A
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1527 of 2362
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Trips and VMT - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Demolition - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Grading - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Architectural Coating - See comment on: "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural Coatings Emission Factors".

Vehicle Trips - See comment on: "Underestimated Number of Saturday and Sunday Vehicle Trips".

Water And Wastewater - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Fleet Mix - See comment on: "Unsubstantiated Changes to Operational Fleet Mix Values".

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 159.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 120.00 72.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 47,054.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 71,500.00 71,522.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 286,000.00 286,088.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 297,514.80 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 160,400.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 212.00 97.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 212.00 97.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.43 0.37
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.43 0.37
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 273.00 34.60
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 4,652.00 196.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1528 of 2362

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 59.00 43.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 185.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.54 0.05
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 4.10
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.24 0.05
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 4.10
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.37 0.05
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 4.10
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,405,013.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1529 of 2362

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2024 0.1710 1.5092 1.5876 3.7800e0030.3782 0.0663 0.4444 0.1398 0.0615 0.2014 0.0000 338.8581 338.8581 0.0645 9.1400e003343.1940 2025 1.7726 0.8067 1.2358 2.8500e0030.1167 0.0311 0.1478 0.0314 0.0292 0.0605 0.0000 255.9998 255.9998 0.0368 8.5000e003259.4547 Maximum 1.7726 1.5092 1.5876 3.7800e0030.3782 0.0663 0.4444 0.1398 0.0615 0.2014 0.0000 338.8581 338.8581 0.0645 9.1400e003343.1940 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2024 0.1710 1.5092 1.5876 3.7800e0030.3782 0.0663 0.4444 0.1398 0.0615 0.2014 0.0000 338.8578 338.8578 0.0645 9.1400e003343.1937 2025 1.7726 0.8067 1.2358 2.8500e0030.1167 0.0311 0.1478 0.0314 0.0292 0.0605 0.0000 255.9997 255.9997 0.0368 8.5000e003259.4545 Maximum 1.7726 1.5092 1.5876 3.7800e0030.3782 0.0663 0.4444 0.1398 0.0615 0.2014 0.0000 338.8578 338.8578 0.0645 9.1400e003343.1937 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1530 of 2362
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 7-1-2024 9-30-2024 1.0020 1.0020
2 10-1-2024 12-31-2024 0.5996 0.5996
3 1-1-2025 3-31-2025 1.0303 1.0303
4 4-1-2025 6-30-2025 1.5431 1.5431
Highest 1.5431 1.5431

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.4593 1.3000e0040.0143 0.0000 5.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 0.0279 0.0279 7.0000e0050.0000 0.0297 Energy 5.3000e0030.0482 0.0405 2.9000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.6600e0033.6600e0030.0000 677.0134 677.0134 0.0308 4.5700e003679.1457 Mobile 0.6764 0.7853 7.3107 0.0168 1.8937 0.0119 1.9057 0.5053 0.0111 0.5164 0.0000 1,550.505 6 1,550.505
6 0.1021 0.0647 1,572.329
5 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 72.5693 0.0000 72.5693 4.2887 0.0000 179.7873 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 26.2280 342.7787 369.0067 2.7102 0.0656 456.3076 Total 2.1410 0.8336 7.3655 0.0170 1.8937 0.0157 1.9094 0.5053 0.0148 0.5201 98.7972 2,570.325 5 2,669.122
8 7.1319 0.1348 2,887.599
8 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1531 of 2362

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1532 of 2362
4 Building Construction Building Construction 9/23/2024 5/1/2025 5 159 5 Paving Paving 3/21/2025 5/1/2025 5 30
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/21/2025 5/1/2025 5 30 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Crawler Tractors 4 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Crawler Tractors 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 536,415; Non-Residential Outdoor: 178,805; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 35
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 72
Acres of Paving: 10.44
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1533 of 2362

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0296 0.0000 0.0296 4.4800e0030.0000 4.4800e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0224 0.2088 0.1971 3.9000e0049.6000e0039.6000e0038.9200e0038.9200e0030.0000 33.9961 33.9961 9.5100e0030.0000 34.2338 Total 0.0224 0.2088 0.1971 3.9000e0040.0296 9.6000e0030.0392 4.4800e0038.9200e0030.0134 0.0000 33.9961 33.9961 9.5100e0030.0000 34.2338 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 5.00 34.60 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 3.00 0.00 185.00 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 8.00 196.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 150.00 43.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1534 of 2362

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 4.0000e0052.4100e0036.2000e0041.0000e0053.0000e0041.0000e0053.1000e0048.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0040.0000 1.0063 1.0063 6.0000e0051.6000e0041.0553 Vendor 7.0000e0052.7100e0038.7000e0041.0000e0054.7000e0041.0000e0054.8000e0041.3000e0041.0000e0051.5000e0040.0000 1.2894 1.2894 4.0000e0051.9000e0041.3457 Worker 5.2000e0044.1000e0045.7900e0032.0000e0052.0700e0031.0000e0052.0800e0035.5000e0041.0000e0055.6000e0040.0000 1.5935 1.5935 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6057 Total 6.3000e0045.5300e0037.2800e0034.0000e0052.8400e0033.0000e0052.8700e0037.6000e0043.0000e0058.1000e0040.0000 3.8892 3.8892 1.4000e0043.9000e0044.0067 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0296 0.0000 0.0296 4.4800e0030.0000 4.4800e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0224 0.2088 0.1971 3.9000e0049.6000e0039.6000e0038.9200e0038.9200e0030.0000 33.9960 33.9960 9.5100e0030.0000 34.2338 Total 0.0224 0.2088 0.1971 3.9000e0040.0296 9.6000e0030.0392 4.4800e0038.9200e0030.0134 0.0000 33.9960 33.9960 9.5100e0030.0000 34.2338 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1535 of 2362

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0000e0058.1000e0042.6000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.3868 0.3868 1.0000e0056.0000e0050.4037 Worker 2.2500e0032.0900e0030.0308 1.0000e0040.0124 7.0000e0050.0125 3.2900e0036.0000e0053.3600e0030.0000 9.4250 9.4250 1.3000e0041.9000e0049.4837 Total 2.2700e0032.9000e0030.0311 1.0000e0040.0125 7.0000e0050.0126 3.3300e0036.0000e0053.4000e0030.0000 9.8118 9.8118 1.4000e0042.5000e0049.8874 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1089 0.0000 0.1089 0.0517 0.0000 0.0517 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0169 0.1627 0.0957 1.9000e0049.0600e0039.0600e0038.3400e0038.3400e0030.0000 16.7228 16.7228 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8580 Total 0.0169 0.1627 0.0957 1.9000e0040.1089 9.0600e0030.1180 0.0517 8.3400e0030.0600 0.0000 16.7228 16.7228 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8580 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1537 of 2362

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1285 0.0000 0.1285 0.0538 0.0000 0.0538 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0537 0.5259 0.4219 9.3000e0040.0244 0.0244 0.0225 0.0225 0.0000 81.7707 81.7707 0.0265 0.0000 82.4319 Total 0.0537 0.5259 0.4219 9.3000e0040.1285 0.0244 0.1529 0.0538 0.0225 0.0762 0.0000 81.7707 81.7707 0.0265 0.0000 82.4319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1538 of 2362

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.1000e0040.0135 3.4900e0036.0000e0051.6900e0038.0000e0051.7700e0034.6000e0048.0000e0055.4000e0040.0000 5.6351 5.6351 3.2000e0049.0000e0045.9098 Vendor 1.6000e0046.5000e0032.0800e0033.0000e0051.1200e0033.0000e0051.1500e0033.2000e0043.0000e0053.5000e0040.0000 3.0945 3.0945 1.1000e0044.4000e0043.2296 Worker 1.0400e0038.1000e0040.0116 3.0000e0054.1400e0032.0000e0054.1600e0031.1000e0032.0000e0051.1200e0030.0000 3.1870 3.1870 7.0000e0058.0000e0053.2114 Total 1.4100e0030.0208 0.0172 1.2000e0046.9500e0031.3000e0047.0800e0031.8800e0031.3000e0042.0100e0030.0000 11.9166 11.9166 5.0000e0041.4200e00312.3508 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1285 0.0000 0.1285 0.0538 0.0000 0.0538 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0537 0.5259 0.4219 9.3000e0040.0244 0.0244 0.0225 0.0225 0.0000 81.7706 81.7706 0.0265 0.0000 82.4318 Total 0.0537 0.5259 0.4219 9.3000e0040.1285 0.0244 0.1529 0.0538 0.0225 0.0762 0.0000 81.7706 81.7706 0.0265 0.0000 82.4318 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1539 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0530 0.4840 0.5820 9.7000e0040.0221 0.0221 0.0208 0.0208 0.0000 83.4657 83.4657 0.0197 0.0000 83.9591 Total 0.0530 0.4840 0.5820 9.7000e0040.0221 0.0221 0.0208 0.0208 0.0000 83.4657 83.4657 0.0197 0.0000 83.9591 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1540 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0400e0030.0839 0.0268 4.1000e0040.0144 4.4000e0040.0148 4.1600e0034.2000e0044.5800e0030.0000 39.9189 39.9189 1.3600e0035.7300e00341.6616 Worker 0.0186 0.0147 0.2085 6.3000e0040.0745 4.3000e0040.0749 0.0198 4.0000e0040.0202 0.0000 57.3664 57.3664 1.2900e0031.3600e00357.8047 Total 0.0207 0.0985 0.2354 1.0400e0030.0889 8.7000e0040.0897 0.0239 8.2000e0040.0248 0.0000 97.2853 97.2853 2.6500e0037.0900e00399.4663 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0530 0.4840 0.5820 9.7000e0040.0221 0.0221 0.0208 0.0208 0.0000 83.4656 83.4656 0.0197 0.0000 83.9590 Total 0.0530 0.4840 0.5820 9.7000e0040.0221 0.0221 0.0208 0.0208 0.0000 83.4656 83.4656 0.0197 0.0000 83.9590 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1541 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0595 0.5424 0.6997 1.1700e0030.0230 0.0230 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 100.8850 100.8850 0.0237 0.0000 101.4778 Total 0.0595 0.5424 0.6997 1.1700e0030.0230 0.0230 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 100.8850 100.8850 0.0237 0.0000 101.4778 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1542 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.3800e0030.1009 0.0318 4.8000e0040.0174 5.3000e0040.0179 5.0200e0035.1000e0045.5300e0030.0000 47.3667 47.3667 1.6500e0036.8100e00349.4369 Worker 0.0211 0.0159 0.2343 7.3000e0040.0900 5.0000e0040.0905 0.0239 4.6000e0040.0244 0.0000 66.9622 66.9622 1.4000e0031.5400e00367.4550 Total 0.0235 0.1168 0.2660 1.2100e0030.1074 1.0300e0030.1084 0.0289 9.7000e0040.0299 0.0000 114.3290 114.3290 3.0500e0038.3500e003116.8920 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0595 0.5424 0.6997 1.1700e0030.0230 0.0230 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 100.8848 100.8848 0.0237 0.0000 101.4777 Total 0.0595 0.5424 0.6997 1.1700e0030.0230 0.0230 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 100.8848 100.8848 0.0237 0.0000 101.4777 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1543 of 2362

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0137 0.1287 0.2187 3.4000e0046.2800e0036.2800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0030.0000 30.0289 30.0289 9.7100e0030.0000 30.2717 Paving 0.0137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0274 0.1287 0.2187 3.4000e0046.2800e0036.2800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0030.0000 30.0289 30.0289 9.7100e0030.0000 30.2717 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1544 of 2362

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.3000e0045.5000e0048.0800e0033.0000e0053.1000e0032.0000e0053.1200e0038.2000e0042.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 2.3090 2.3090 5.0000e0055.0000e0052.3260 Total 7.3000e0045.5000e0048.0800e0033.0000e0053.1000e0032.0000e0053.1200e0038.2000e0042.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 2.3090 2.3090 5.0000e0055.0000e0052.3260 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0137 0.1287 0.2187 3.4000e0046.2800e0036.2800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0030.0000 30.0289 30.0289 9.7100e0030.0000 30.2717 Paving 0.0137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0274 0.1287 0.2187 3.4000e0046.2800e0036.2800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0030.0000 30.0289 30.0289 9.7100e0030.0000 30.2717 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1545 of 2362

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4500e0031.1000e0030.0162 5.0000e0056.2000e0033.0000e0056.2400e0031.6500e0033.0000e0051.6800e0030.0000 4.6181 4.6181 1.0000e0041.1000e0044.6521 Total 1.4500e0031.1000e0030.0162 5.0000e0056.2000e0033.0000e0056.2400e0031.6500e0033.0000e0051.6800e0030.0000 4.6181 4.6181 1.0000e0041.1000e0044.6521 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 1.6575 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.5600e0030.0172 0.0271 4.0000e0057.7000e0047.7000e0047.7000e0047.7000e0040.0000 3.8299 3.8299 2.1000e0040.0000 3.8351 Total 1.6601 0.0172 0.0271 4.0000e0057.7000e0047.7000e0047.7000e0047.7000e0040.0000 3.8299 3.8299 2.1000e0040.0000 3.8351 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1547 of 2362

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1548 of 2362
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.6764 0.7853 7.3107 0.0168 1.8937 0.0119 1.9057 0.5053 0.0111 0.5164 0.0000 1,550.505 6 1,550.505
6 0.1021 0.0647 1,572.329
5 Unmitigated 0.6764 0.7853 7.3107 0.0168 1.8937 0.0119 1.9057 0.5053 0.0111 0.5164 0.0000 1,550.505 6 1,550.505
6 0.1021 0.0647 1,572.329
5 4.2 Trip Summary Information

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
User Defined Industrial 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1549 of 2362
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Industrial Park 0.537891 0.065289 0.189998 0.126515 0.023567 0.006518 0.011114 0.008084 0.000933 0.000591 0.025474 0.000708 0.003318 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.537891 0.065289 0.189998 0.126515 0.023567 0.006518 0.011114 0.008084 0.000933 0.000591 0.025474 0.000708 0.003318 Parking Lot 0.537891 0.065289 0.189998 0.126515 0.023567 0.006518 0.011114 0.008084 0.000933 0.000591 0.025474 0.000708 0.003318 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

0.537891 0.065289 0.189998 0.126515 0.023567 0.006518 0.011114 0.008084 0.000933 0.000591 0.025474 0.000708 0.003318 User Defined Industrial 0.537891 0.065289 0.189998 0.126515 0.023567 0.006518 0.011114 0.008084 0.000933 0.000591 0.025474 0.000708 0.003318

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 624.5340 624.5340 0.0298 3.6100e003626.3544 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 624.5340 624.5340 0.0298 3.6100e003626.3544 NaturalGas
Mitigated

5.3000e0030.0482 0.0405 2.9000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.6600e0033.6600e0030.0000 52.4794 52.4794 1.0100e0039.6000e00452.7913 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

5.3000e0030.0482 0.0405 2.9000e0043.6600e0033.6600e0033.6600e0033.6600e0030.0000 52.4794 52.4794 1.0100e0039.6000e00452.7913

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1550 of 2362

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Industrial Park 737392 3.9800e0030.0362 0.0304 2.2000e0042.7500e0032.7500e0032.7500e0032.7500e0030.0000 39.3500 39.3500 7.5000e0047.2000e00439.5839 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
246036 1.3300e0030.0121 0.0101 7.0000e0059.2000e0049.2000e0049.2000e0049.2000e0040.0000 13.1294 13.1294 2.5000e0042.4000e00413.2074 User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.3100e0030.0482 0.0405 2.9000e0043.6700e0033.6700e0033.6700e0033.6700e0030.0000 52.4794 52.4794 1.0000e0039.6000e00452.7913 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1551 of 2362

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Industrial Park 737392 3.9800e0030.0362 0.0304 2.2000e0042.7500e0032.7500e0032.7500e0032.7500e0030.0000 39.3500 39.3500 7.5000e0047.2000e00439.5839 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
246036 1.3300e0030.0121 0.0101 7.0000e0059.2000e0049.2000e0049.2000e0049.2000e0040.0000 13.1294 13.1294 2.5000e0042.4000e00413.2074 User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.3100e0030.0482 0.0405 2.9000e0043.6700e0033.6700e0033.6700e0033.6700e0030.0000 52.4794 52.4794 1.0000e0039.6000e00452.7913 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1552 of 2362

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Industrial Park 894025 280.6138 0.0134 1.6200e003281.4317 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

1.09572e
+006
343.9202 0.0164 1.9900e003344.9227
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 624.5340 0.0298 3.6100e003626.3544
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1553 of 2362

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

1.09572e
+006
343.9202 0.0164 1.9900e003344.9227
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 624.5340 0.0298 3.6100e003626.3544
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1554 of 2362
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.4593 1.3000e0040.0143 0.0000 5.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 0.0279 0.0279 7.0000e0050.0000 0.0297 Unmitigated 1.4593 1.3000e0040.0143 0.0000 5.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 0.0279 0.0279 7.0000e0050.0000 0.0297

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.1658 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.2922 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3200e0031.3000e0040.0143 0.0000 5.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 0.0279 0.0279 7.0000e0050.0000 0.0297 Total 1.4593 1.3000e0040.0143 0.0000 5.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 0.0279 0.0279 7.0000e0050.0000 0.0297 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1555 of 2362

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.1658 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.2922 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3200e0031.3000e0040.0143 0.0000 5.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 0.0279 0.0279 7.0000e0050.0000 0.0297 Total 1.4593 1.3000e0040.0143 0.0000 5.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 0.0279 0.0279 7.0000e0050.0000 0.0297 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1556 of 2362
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 369.0067 2.7102 0.0656 456.3076
Unmitigated 369.0067 2.7102 0.0656 456.3076

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Industrial Park 16.5344 /
0 72.8214 0.5420 0.0131 90.2788
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

66.1375 /

1.40501
296.1852 2.1682 0.0525 366.0288
User Defined
Industrial
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 369.0067 2.7102 0.0656 456.3076
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1557 of 2362

66.1375 /

1.40501
296.1852 2.1682 0.0525 366.0288
User Defined
Industrial
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 369.0067 2.7102 0.0656 456.3076
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1558 of 2362
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 72.5693 4.2887 0.0000 179.7873
Unmitigated 72.5693 4.2887 0.0000 179.7873
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Industrial Park 88.66 17.9972 1.0636 0.0000 44.5873
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
268.84 54.5721 3.2251 0.0000 135.2000
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 72.5693 4.2887 0.0000 179.7873
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1559 of 2362

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1560 of 2362

11.0 Vegetation
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 35 Date: 4/23/2024 1:31 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1561 of 2362
15517 - 1101 California
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Land Use - See comment on: "Failure to Consider Potential Cold Storage Requirements".

Construction Phase - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with Checklist's model.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Operational Year 2026
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
691.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1562 of 2362
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Trips and VMT - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Demolition - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Grading - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Architectural Coating - See comment on: "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural Coatings Emission Factors".

Vehicle Trips - See comment on: "Underestimated Number of Saturday and Sunday Vehicle Trips".

Water And Wastewater - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Fleet Mix - See comment on: "Unsubstantiated Changes to Operational Fleet Mix Values".

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 159.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 120.00 72.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 47,054.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 71,500.00 71,522.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 286,000.00 286,088.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 297,514.80 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 160,400.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 212.00 97.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 212.00 97.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.43 0.37
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.43 0.37
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 273.00 34.60
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 4,652.00 196.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1563 of 2362

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 59.00 43.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 185.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.54 0.05
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 4.10
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.24 0.05
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 4.10
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.37 0.05
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 4.10
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,405,013.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1564 of 2362

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 3.8248 36.3769 29.3201 0.0703 24.3364 1.8271 26.1635 11.0103 1.6809 12.6913 0.0000 6,893.957 5 6,893.957
5 1.9798 0.2138 6,974.295
2 2025 114.5526 24.8208 40.6566 0.0866 3.1492 1.0247 4.1739 0.8443 0.9582 1.8025 0.0000 8,538.736 5 8,538.736
5 1.4178 0.2189 8,639.419
5 Maximum 114.5526 36.3769 40.6566 0.0866 24.3364 1.8271 26.1635 11.0103 1.6809 12.6913 0.0000 8,538.736 5 8,538.736
5 1.9798 0.2189 8,639.419
5 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 3.8248 36.3769 29.3201 0.0703 24.3364 1.8271 26.1635 11.0103 1.6809 12.6913 0.0000 6,893.957 5 6,893.957
5 1.9798 0.2138 6,974.295
2 2025 114.5526 24.8208 40.6566 0.0866 3.1492 1.0247 4.1739 0.8443 0.9582 1.8025 0.0000 8,538.736 5 8,538.736
5 1.4178 0.2189 8,639.419
5 Maximum 114.5526 36.3769 40.6566 0.0866 24.3364 1.8271 26.1635 11.0103 1.6809 12.6913 0.0000 8,538.736 5 8,538.736
5 1.9798 0.2189 8,639.419
5 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1565 of 2362
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1566 of 2362

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Energy 0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5800e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9791 316.9791 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627 Mobile 3.8235 3.9394 40.8056 0.0951 10.6118 0.0657 10.6775 2.8269 0.0610 2.8879 9,700.207 4 9,700.207
4 0.6075 0.3734 9,826.673
6 Total 11.8520 4.2046 41.1419 0.0967 10.6118 0.0862 10.6980 2.8269 0.0815 2.9084 10,017.43 23 10,017.43
23 0.6143 0.3792 10,145.79
81 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Energy 0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5800e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9791 316.9791 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627 Mobile 3.8235 3.9394 40.8056 0.0951 10.6118 0.0657 10.6775 2.8269 0.0610 2.8879 9,700.207 4 9,700.207
4 0.6075 0.3734 9,826.673
6 Total 11.8520 4.2046 41.1419 0.0967 10.6118 0.0862 10.6980 2.8269 0.0815 2.9084 10,017.43 23 10,017.43
23 0.6143 0.3792 10,145.79
81 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1567 of 2362

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 7/1/2024 7/26/2024 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/29/2024 8/9/2024 5 10 3 Grading Grading 8/12/2024 9/20/2024 5 30
4 Building Construction Building Construction 9/23/2024 5/1/2025 5 159 5 Paving Paving 3/21/2025 5/1/2025 5 30
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/21/2025 5/1/2025 5 30 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Crawler Tractors 4 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 536,415; Non-Residential Outdoor: 178,805; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 35
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 72
Acres of Paving: 10.44
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1568 of 2362

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Grading Crawler Tractors 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 5.00 34.60 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 3.00 0.00 185.00 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 8.00 196.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 150.00 43.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1569 of 2362

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.9580 0.0000 2.9580 0.4479 0.0000 0.4479 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2437 20.8781 19.7073 0.0388 0.9602 0.9602 0.8922 0.8922 3,747.422 8 3,747.422
8 1.0485 3,773.634
5 Total 2.2437 20.8781 19.7073 0.0388 2.9580 0.9602 3.9182 0.4479 0.8922 1.3401 3,747.422 8 3,747.422
8 1.0485 3,773.634
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.7700e0030.2289 0.0620 1.0100e0030.0304 1.4500e0030.0318 8.3300e0031.3900e0039.7200e003110.8729 110.8729 6.2500e0030.0176 116.2780 Vendor 6.6800e0030.2575 0.0857 1.3200e0030.0473 1.4200e0030.0487 0.0136 1.3600e0030.0150 142.0572 142.0572 4.8400e0030.0204 148.2537 Worker 0.0518 0.0360 0.6177 1.8100e0030.2110 1.2000e0030.2122 0.0559 1.1000e0030.0571 182.7158 182.7158 3.9200e0033.8400e003183.9592 Total 0.0623 0.5225 0.7654 4.1400e0030.2886 4.0700e0030.2927 0.0779 3.8500e0030.0817 435.6460 435.6460 0.0150 0.0418 448.4908 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1570 of 2362

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.9580 0.0000 2.9580 0.4479 0.0000 0.4479 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2437 20.8781 19.7073 0.0388 0.9602 0.9602 0.8922 0.8922 0.0000 3,747.422 8 3,747.422
8 1.0485 3,773.634
5 Total 2.2437 20.8781 19.7073 0.0388 2.9580 0.9602 3.9182 0.4479 0.8922 1.3401 0.0000 3,747.422 8 3,747.422
8 1.0485 3,773.634
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.7700e0030.2289 0.0620 1.0100e0030.0304 1.4500e0030.0318 8.3300e0031.3900e0039.7200e003110.8729 110.8729 6.2500e0030.0176 116.2780 Vendor 6.6800e0030.2575 0.0857 1.3200e0030.0473 1.4200e0030.0487 0.0136 1.3600e0030.0150 142.0572 142.0572 4.8400e0030.0204 148.2537 Worker 0.0518 0.0360 0.6177 1.8100e0030.2110 1.2000e0030.2122 0.0559 1.1000e0030.0571 182.7158 182.7158 3.9200e0033.8400e003183.9592 Total 0.0623 0.5225 0.7654 4.1400e0030.2886 4.0700e0030.2927 0.0779 3.8500e0030.0817 435.6460 435.6460 0.0150 0.0418 448.4908 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1571 of 2362

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 21.7780 0.0000 21.7780 10.3315 0.0000 10.3315 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3848 32.5462 19.1457 0.0380 1.8126 1.8126 1.6676 1.6676 3,686.751 3 3,686.751
3 1.1924 3,716.560
5 Total 3.3848 32.5462 19.1457 0.0380 21.7780 1.8126 23.5906 10.3315 1.6676 11.9990 3,686.751 3 3,686.751
3 1.1924 3,716.560
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.0100e0030.1545 0.0514 7.9000e0040.0284 8.5000e0040.0292 8.1600e0038.2000e0048.9800e00385.2343 85.2343 2.9100e0030.0122 88.9522 Worker 0.4360 0.3667 6.7350 0.0214 2.5300 0.0137 2.5437 0.6707 0.0126 0.6833 2,162.382 5 2,162.382
5 0.0307 0.0374 2,174.305
2 Total 0.4400 0.5212 6.7864 0.0222 2.5584 0.0145 2.5729 0.6789 0.0134 0.6923 2,247.616 9 2,247.616
9 0.0336 0.0497 2,263.257
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1572 of 2362

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 21.7780 0.0000 21.7780 10.3315 0.0000 10.3315 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3848 32.5462 19.1457 0.0380 1.8126 1.8126 1.6676 1.6676 0.0000 3,686.751 3 3,686.751
3 1.1924 3,716.560
5 Total 3.3848 32.5462 19.1457 0.0380 21.7780 1.8126 23.5906 10.3315 1.6676 11.9990 0.0000 3,686.751 3 3,686.751
3 1.1924 3,716.560
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.0100e0030.1545 0.0514 7.9000e0040.0284 8.5000e0040.0292 8.1600e0038.2000e0048.9800e00385.2343 85.2343 2.9100e0030.0122 88.9522 Worker 0.4360 0.3667 6.7350 0.0214 2.5300 0.0137 2.5437 0.6707 0.0126 0.6833 2,162.382 5 2,162.382
5 0.0307 0.0374 2,174.305
2 Total 0.4400 0.5212 6.7864 0.0222 2.5584 0.0145 2.5729 0.6789 0.0134 0.6923 2,247.616 9 2,247.616
9 0.0336 0.0497 2,263.257
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1573 of 2362

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.5673 0.0000 8.5673 3.5851 0.0000 3.5851 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.5801 35.0621 28.1278 0.0621 1.6270 1.6270 1.4969 1.4969 6,009.119 3 6,009.119
3 1.9435 6,057.706
1 Total 3.5801 35.0621 28.1278 0.0621 8.5673 1.6270 10.1943 3.5851 1.4969 5.0819 6,009.119 3 6,009.119
3 1.9435 6,057.706
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0141 0.8547 0.2316 3.7600e0030.1144 5.4200e0030.1198 0.0314 5.1900e0030.0365 413.9255 413.9255 0.0234 0.0658 434.1044 Vendor 0.0107 0.4120 0.1371 2.1100e0030.0757 2.2700e0030.0779 0.0218 2.1700e0030.0240 227.2916 227.2916 7.7500e0030.0326 237.2059 Worker 0.0691 0.0480 0.8236 2.4100e0030.2813 1.6000e0030.2829 0.0746 1.4700e0030.0761 243.6211 243.6211 5.2200e0035.1200e003245.2789 Total 0.0939 1.3148 1.1923 8.2800e0030.4713 9.2900e0030.4806 0.1277 8.8300e0030.1366 884.8382 884.8382 0.0363 0.1035 916.5891 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1574 of 2362

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.5673 0.0000 8.5673 3.5851 0.0000 3.5851 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.5801 35.0621 28.1278 0.0621 1.6270 1.6270 1.4969 1.4969 0.0000 6,009.119 3 6,009.119
3 1.9435 6,057.706
1 Total 3.5801 35.0621 28.1278 0.0621 8.5673 1.6270 10.1943 3.5851 1.4969 5.0819 0.0000 6,009.119 3 6,009.119
3 1.9435 6,057.706
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0141 0.8547 0.2316 3.7600e0030.1144 5.4200e0030.1198 0.0314 5.1900e0030.0365 413.9255 413.9255 0.0234 0.0658 434.1044 Vendor 0.0107 0.4120 0.1371 2.1100e0030.0757 2.2700e0030.0779 0.0218 2.1700e0030.0240 227.2916 227.2916 7.7500e0030.0326 237.2059 Worker 0.0691 0.0480 0.8236 2.4100e0030.2813 1.6000e0030.2829 0.0746 1.4700e0030.0761 243.6211 243.6211 5.2200e0035.1200e003245.2789 Total 0.0939 1.3148 1.1923 8.2800e0030.4713 9.2900e0030.4806 0.1277 8.8300e0030.1366 884.8382 884.8382 0.0363 0.1035 916.5891 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1575 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0575 2.2147 0.7367 0.0113 0.4066 0.0122 0.4189 0.1170 0.0117 0.1287 1,221.692 2 1,221.692
2 0.0417 0.1753 1,274.981
8 Worker 0.5183 0.3602 6.1773 0.0181 2.1097 0.0120 2.1217 0.5595 0.0110 0.5705 1,827.158 2 1,827.158
2 0.0392 0.0384 1,839.591
5 Total 0.5758 2.5749 6.9140 0.0294 2.5163 0.0242 2.5405 0.6765 0.0227 0.6992 3,048.850 4 3,048.850
4 0.0808 0.2138 3,114.573
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1576 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0575 2.2147 0.7367 0.0113 0.4066 0.0122 0.4189 0.1170 0.0117 0.1287 1,221.692 2 1,221.692
2 0.0417 0.1753 1,274.981
8 Worker 0.5183 0.3602 6.1773 0.0181 2.1097 0.0120 2.1217 0.5595 0.0110 0.5705 1,827.158 2 1,827.158
2 0.0392 0.0384 1,839.591
5 Total 0.5758 2.5749 6.9140 0.0294 2.5163 0.0242 2.5405 0.6765 0.0227 0.6992 3,048.850 4 3,048.850
4 0.0808 0.2138 3,114.573
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1577 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0557 2.2041 0.7219 0.0111 0.4066 0.0123 0.4189 0.1170 0.0117 0.1288 1,199.682 4 1,199.682
4 0.0420 0.1723 1,252.075
4 Worker 0.4848 0.3230 5.7407 0.0175 2.1097 0.0114 2.1211 0.5595 0.0105 0.5699 1,764.912 7 1,764.912
7 0.0352 0.0359 1,776.481
8 Total 0.5405 2.5271 6.4626 0.0286 2.5163 0.0237 2.5400 0.6765 0.0222 0.6987 2,964.595 1 2,964.595
1 0.0772 0.2082 3,028.557
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1578 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0557 2.2041 0.7219 0.0111 0.4066 0.0123 0.4189 0.1170 0.0117 0.1288 1,199.682 4 1,199.682
4 0.0420 0.1723 1,252.075
4 Worker 0.4848 0.3230 5.7407 0.0175 2.1097 0.0114 2.1211 0.5595 0.0105 0.5699 1,764.912 7 1,764.912
7 0.0352 0.0359 1,776.481
8 Total 0.5405 2.5271 6.4626 0.0286 2.5163 0.0237 2.5400 0.6765 0.0222 0.6987 2,964.595 1 2,964.595
1 0.0772 0.2082 3,028.557
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1579 of 2362

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.9118 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8269 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0485 0.0323 0.5741 1.7500e0030.2110 1.1400e0030.2121 0.0559 1.0500e0030.0570 176.4913 176.4913 3.5200e0033.5900e003177.6482 Total 0.0485 0.0323 0.5741 1.7500e0030.2110 1.1400e0030.2121 0.0559 1.0500e0030.0570 176.4913 176.4913 3.5200e0033.5900e003177.6482 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1580 of 2362

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.9118 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8269 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0485 0.0323 0.5741 1.7500e0030.2110 1.1400e0030.2121 0.0559 1.0500e0030.0570 176.4913 176.4913 3.5200e0033.5900e003177.6482 Total 0.0485 0.0323 0.5741 1.7500e0030.2110 1.1400e0030.2121 0.0559 1.0500e0030.0570 176.4913 176.4913 3.5200e0033.5900e003177.6482 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1581 of 2362

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 110.5015 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 110.6724 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0970 0.0646 1.1482 3.4900e0030.4219 2.2800e0030.4242 0.1119 2.1000e0030.1140 352.9825 352.9825 7.0500e0037.1700e003355.2964 Total 0.0970 0.0646 1.1482 3.4900e0030.4219 2.2800e0030.4242 0.1119 2.1000e0030.1140 352.9825 352.9825 7.0500e0037.1700e003355.2964 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1582 of 2362

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 110.5015 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 110.6724 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0970 0.0646 1.1482 3.4900e0030.4219 2.2800e0030.4242 0.1119 2.1000e0030.1140 352.9825 352.9825 7.0500e0037.1700e003355.2964 Total 0.0970 0.0646 1.1482 3.4900e0030.4219 2.2800e0030.4242 0.1119 2.1000e0030.1140 352.9825 352.9825 7.0500e0037.1700e003355.2964 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1583 of 2362

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.8235 3.9394 40.8056 0.0951 10.6118 0.0657 10.6775 2.8269 0.0610 2.8879 9,700.207 4 9,700.207
4 0.6075 0.3734 9,826.673
6 Unmitigated 3.8235 3.9394 40.8056 0.0951 10.6118 0.0657 10.6775 2.8269 0.0610 2.8879 9,700.207 4 9,700.207
4 0.6075 0.3734 9,826.673
6 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Industrial Park 3.58 3.58 3.58 14,217 14,217
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1,172.60 1,172.60 1172.60 5,025,432 5,025,432 User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,176.18 1,176.18 1,176.18 5,039,649 5,039,649
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Industrial Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 79 19 2 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1584 of 2362
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
User Defined Industrial 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Industrial Park 0.537891 0.065289 0.189998 0.126515 0.023567 0.006518 0.011114 0.008084 0.000933 0.000591 0.025474 0.000708 0.003318 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.537891 0.065289 0.189998 0.126515 0.023567 0.006518 0.011114 0.008084 0.000933 0.000591 0.025474 0.000708 0.003318 Parking Lot 0.537891 0.065289 0.189998 0.126515 0.023567 0.006518 0.011114 0.008084 0.000933 0.000591 0.025474 0.000708 0.003318 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1585 of 2362
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5800e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9791 316.9791 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5800e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9791 316.9791 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Industrial Park 2020.25 0.0218 0.1981 0.1664 1.1900e0030.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 237.6767 237.6767 4.5600e0034.3600e003239.0891 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
674.07 7.2700e0030.0661 0.0555 4.0000e0045.0200e0035.0200e0035.0200e0035.0200e00379.3024 79.3024 1.5200e0031.4500e00379.7737 User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5900e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9790 316.9790 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1586 of 2362

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Industrial Park 2.02025 0.0218 0.1981 0.1664 1.1900e0030.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 237.6767 237.6767 4.5600e0034.3600e003239.0891 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

0.67407 7.2700e0030.0661 0.0555 4.0000e0045.0200e0035.0200e0035.0200e0035.0200e00379.3024 79.3024 1.5200e0031.4500e00379.7737 User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5900e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9790 316.9790 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1587 of 2362
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Unmitigated 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.9082 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

7.0807 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.0105 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Total 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1588 of 2362

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.9082 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

7.0807 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.0105 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Total 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1589 of 2362

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:28 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1590 of 2362
15517 - 1101 California
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Land Use - See comment on: "Failure to Consider Potential Cold Storage Requirements".

Construction Phase - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Demolition - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Grading - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Architectural Coating - See comment on: "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural Coatings Emission Factors".

Vehicle Trips - See comment on: "Underestimated Number of Saturday and Sunday Vehicle Trips".

Water And Wastewater - Consistent with Checklist's model.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Operational Year 2026
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
691.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1591 of 2362
Fleet Mix - See comment on: "Unsubstantiated Changes to Operational Fleet Mix Values".

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Trips and VMT - Consistent with Checklist's model.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 159.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 120.00 72.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 47,054.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 71,500.00 71,522.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 286,000.00 286,088.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 297,514.80 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 160,400.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 212.00 97.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 212.00 97.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.43 0.37
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.43 0.37
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Crawler Tractors tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 273.00 34.60
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 4,652.00 196.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1592 of 2362

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 59.00 43.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 185.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 17.50
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.54 0.05
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 4.10
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.24 0.05
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 4.10
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.37 0.05
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 4.10
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,405,013.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1593 of 2362

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 3.8768 36.4382 29.2549 0.0702 24.2661 1.8267 26.0928 10.9917 1.6806 12.6723 0.0000 6,881.809 1 6,881.809
1 1.9797 0.2167 6,962.290
1 2025 114.6102 24.9643 40.0282 0.0854 3.1492 1.0247 4.1739 0.8443 0.9582 1.8025 0.0000 8,419.330 4 8,419.330
4 1.4178 0.2224 8,521.055
4 Maximum 114.6102 36.4382 40.0282 0.0854 24.2661 1.8267 26.0928 10.9917 1.6806 12.6723 0.0000 8,419.330 4 8,419.330
4 1.9797 0.2224 8,521.055
4 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 3.8768 36.4382 29.2549 0.0702 24.2661 1.8267 26.0928 10.9917 1.6806 12.6723 0.0000 6,881.809 1 6,881.809
1 1.9797 0.2167 6,962.290
1 2025 114.6102 24.9643 40.0282 0.0854 3.1492 1.0247 4.1739 0.8443 0.9582 1.8025 0.0000 8,419.330 4 8,419.330
4 1.4178 0.2224 8,521.055
4 Maximum 114.6102 36.4382 40.0282 0.0854 24.2661 1.8267 26.0928 10.9917 1.6806 12.6723 0.0000 8,419.330 4 8,419.330
4 1.9797 0.2224 8,521.055
4 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1594 of 2362
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1595 of 2362

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Energy 0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5800e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9791 316.9791 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627 Mobile 3.7691 4.2498 39.7899 0.0911 10.6118 0.0657 10.6775 2.8269 0.0610 2.8880 9,292.945 9 9,292.945
9 0.6208 0.3890 9,424.387
0 Total 11.7976 4.5150 40.1262 0.0927 10.6118 0.0862 10.6980 2.8269 0.0815 2.9085 9,610.170 8 9,610.170
8 0.6275 0.3948 9,743.511
5 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Energy 0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5800e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9791 316.9791 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627 Mobile 3.7691 4.2498 39.7899 0.0911 10.6118 0.0657 10.6775 2.8269 0.0610 2.8880 9,292.945 9 9,292.945
9 0.6208 0.3890 9,424.387
0 Total 11.7976 4.5150 40.1262 0.0927 10.6118 0.0862 10.6980 2.8269 0.0815 2.9085 9,610.170 8 9,610.170
8 0.6275 0.3948 9,743.511
5 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1596 of 2362

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 7/1/2024 7/26/2024 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/29/2024 8/9/2024 5 10 3 Grading Grading 8/12/2024 9/20/2024 5 30
4 Building Construction Building Construction 9/23/2024 5/1/2025 5 159 5 Paving Paving 3/21/2025 5/1/2025 5 30
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/21/2025 5/1/2025 5 30 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Crawler Tractors 4 8.00 97 0.37
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 536,415; Non-Residential Outdoor: 178,805; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 35
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 72
Acres of Paving: 10.44
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1597 of 2362

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Crawler Tractors 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 5.00 34.60 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 17.50 3.00 0.00 185.00 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 8.00 196.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 150.00 43.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1598 of 2362

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.9580 0.0000 2.9580 0.4479 0.0000 0.4479 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2437 20.8781 19.7073 0.0388 0.9602 0.9602 0.8922 0.8922 3,747.422 8 3,747.422
8 1.0485 3,773.634
5 Total 2.2437 20.8781 19.7073 0.0388 2.9580 0.9602 3.9182 0.4479 0.8922 1.3401 3,747.422 8 3,747.422
8 1.0485 3,773.634
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.5300e0030.2391 0.0629 1.0100e0030.0304 1.4600e0030.0318 8.3300e0031.3900e0039.7300e003110.9914 110.9914 6.2400e0030.0176 116.4019 Vendor 6.5300e0030.2692 0.0879 1.3200e0030.0473 1.4300e0030.0487 0.0136 1.3600e0030.0150 142.2269 142.2269 4.8300e0030.0204 148.4353 Worker 0.0565 0.0398 0.5638 1.7100e0030.2110 1.2000e0030.2122 0.0559 1.1000e0030.0571 173.0691 173.0691 3.9300e0034.1000e003174.3905 Total 0.0665 0.5480 0.7146 4.0400e0030.2886 4.0900e0030.2927 0.0779 3.8500e0030.0818 426.2874 426.2874 0.0150 0.0422 439.2276 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1599 of 2362

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.9580 0.0000 2.9580 0.4479 0.0000 0.4479 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2437 20.8781 19.7073 0.0388 0.9602 0.9602 0.8922 0.8922 0.0000 3,747.422 8 3,747.422
8 1.0485 3,773.634
5 Total 2.2437 20.8781 19.7073 0.0388 2.9580 0.9602 3.9182 0.4479 0.8922 1.3401 0.0000 3,747.422 8 3,747.422
8 1.0485 3,773.634
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.5300e0030.2391 0.0629 1.0100e0030.0304 1.4600e0030.0318 8.3300e0031.3900e0039.7300e003110.9914 110.9914 6.2400e0030.0176 116.4019 Vendor 6.5300e0030.2692 0.0879 1.3200e0030.0473 1.4300e0030.0487 0.0136 1.3600e0030.0150 142.2269 142.2269 4.8300e0030.0204 148.4353 Worker 0.0565 0.0398 0.5638 1.7100e0030.2110 1.2000e0030.2122 0.0559 1.1000e0030.0571 173.0691 173.0691 3.9300e0034.1000e003174.3905 Total 0.0665 0.5480 0.7146 4.0400e0030.2886 4.0900e0030.2927 0.0779 3.8500e0030.0818 426.2874 426.2874 0.0150 0.0422 439.2276 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1600 of 2362

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 21.7780 0.0000 21.7780 10.3315 0.0000 10.3315 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3848 32.5462 19.1457 0.0380 1.8126 1.8126 1.6676 1.6676 3,686.751 3 3,686.751
3 1.1924 3,716.560
5 Total 3.3848 32.5462 19.1457 0.0380 21.7780 1.8126 23.5906 10.3315 1.6676 11.9990 3,686.751 3 3,686.751
3 1.1924 3,716.560
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.9200e0030.1615 0.0527 7.9000e0040.0284 8.6000e0040.0292 8.1600e0038.2000e0048.9800e00385.3362 85.3362 2.9000e0030.0123 89.0612 Worker 0.4881 0.3942 5.7903 0.0197 2.4597 0.0133 2.4730 0.6521 0.0122 0.6643 1,990.071 8 1,990.071
8 0.0278 0.0389 2,002.352
7 Total 0.4920 0.5557 5.8431 0.0205 2.4881 0.0141 2.5022 0.6602 0.0130 0.6733 2,075.408 0 2,075.408
0 0.0307 0.0511 2,091.413
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1601 of 2362

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 21.7780 0.0000 21.7780 10.3315 0.0000 10.3315 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3848 32.5462 19.1457 0.0380 1.8126 1.8126 1.6676 1.6676 0.0000 3,686.751 3 3,686.751
3 1.1924 3,716.560
5 Total 3.3848 32.5462 19.1457 0.0380 21.7780 1.8126 23.5906 10.3315 1.6676 11.9990 0.0000 3,686.751 3 3,686.751
3 1.1924 3,716.560
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.9200e0030.1615 0.0527 7.9000e0040.0284 8.6000e0040.0292 8.1600e0038.2000e0048.9800e00385.3362 85.3362 2.9000e0030.0123 89.0612 Worker 0.4881 0.3942 5.7903 0.0197 2.4597 0.0133 2.4730 0.6521 0.0122 0.6643 1,990.071 8 1,990.071
8 0.0278 0.0389 2,002.352
7 Total 0.4920 0.5557 5.8431 0.0205 2.4881 0.0141 2.5022 0.6602 0.0130 0.6733 2,075.408 0 2,075.408
0 0.0307 0.0511 2,091.413
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1602 of 2362

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.5673 0.0000 8.5673 3.5851 0.0000 3.5851 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.5801 35.0621 28.1278 0.0621 1.6270 1.6270 1.4969 1.4969 6,009.119 3 6,009.119
3 1.9435 6,057.706
1 Total 3.5801 35.0621 28.1278 0.0621 8.5673 1.6270 10.1943 3.5851 1.4969 5.0819 6,009.119 3 6,009.119
3 1.9435 6,057.706
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0132 0.8925 0.2347 3.7700e0030.1144 5.4300e0030.1198 0.0314 5.2000e0030.0366 414.3678 414.3678 0.0233 0.0658 434.5669 Vendor 0.0105 0.4307 0.1406 2.1100e0030.0757 2.2800e0030.0779 0.0218 2.1800e0030.0240 227.5631 227.5631 7.7200e0030.0327 237.4965 Worker 0.0753 0.0531 0.7518 2.2800e0030.2813 1.6000e0030.2829 0.0746 1.4700e0030.0761 230.7588 230.7588 5.2400e0035.4700e003232.5206 Total 0.0989 1.3762 1.1270 8.1600e0030.4713 9.3100e0030.4806 0.1277 8.8500e0030.1366 872.6897 872.6897 0.0363 0.1040 904.5840 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1603 of 2362

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.5673 0.0000 8.5673 3.5851 0.0000 3.5851 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.5801 35.0621 28.1278 0.0621 1.6270 1.6270 1.4969 1.4969 0.0000 6,009.119 3 6,009.119
3 1.9435 6,057.706
1 Total 3.5801 35.0621 28.1278 0.0621 8.5673 1.6270 10.1943 3.5851 1.4969 5.0819 0.0000 6,009.119 3 6,009.119
3 1.9435 6,057.706
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0132 0.8925 0.2347 3.7700e0030.1144 5.4300e0030.1198 0.0314 5.2000e0030.0366 414.3678 414.3678 0.0233 0.0658 434.5669 Vendor 0.0105 0.4307 0.1406 2.1100e0030.0757 2.2800e0030.0779 0.0218 2.1800e0030.0240 227.5631 227.5631 7.7200e0030.0327 237.4965 Worker 0.0753 0.0531 0.7518 2.2800e0030.2813 1.6000e0030.2829 0.0746 1.4700e0030.0761 230.7588 230.7588 5.2400e0035.4700e003232.5206 Total 0.0989 1.3762 1.1270 8.1600e0030.4713 9.3100e0030.4806 0.1277 8.8500e0030.1366 872.6897 872.6897 0.0363 0.1040 904.5840 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1604 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0562 2.3148 0.7557 0.0114 0.4066 0.0123 0.4189 0.1170 0.0117 0.1288 1,223.151 5 1,223.151
5 0.0415 0.1757 1,276.543
7 Worker 0.5647 0.3979 5.6383 0.0171 2.1097 0.0120 2.1217 0.5595 0.0110 0.5705 1,730.691 3 1,730.691
3 0.0393 0.0411 1,743.904
6 Total 0.6209 2.7127 6.3940 0.0285 2.5163 0.0243 2.5406 0.6765 0.0228 0.6992 2,953.842 8 2,953.842
8 0.0808 0.2167 3,020.448
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1605 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0562 2.3148 0.7557 0.0114 0.4066 0.0123 0.4189 0.1170 0.0117 0.1288 1,223.151 5 1,223.151
5 0.0415 0.1757 1,276.543
7 Worker 0.5647 0.3979 5.6383 0.0171 2.1097 0.0120 2.1217 0.5595 0.0110 0.5705 1,730.691 3 1,730.691
3 0.0393 0.0411 1,743.904
6 Total 0.6209 2.7127 6.3940 0.0285 2.5163 0.0243 2.5406 0.6765 0.0228 0.6992 2,953.842 8 2,953.842
8 0.0808 0.2167 3,020.448
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1606 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0543 2.3038 0.7408 0.0111 0.4066 0.0123 0.4189 0.1170 0.0118 0.1288 1,201.141 4 1,201.141
4 0.0418 0.1726 1,253.633
4 Worker 0.5302 0.3567 5.2428 0.0165 2.1097 0.0114 2.1211 0.5595 0.0105 0.5699 1,671.939 6 1,671.939
6 0.0354 0.0383 1,684.234
1 Total 0.5845 2.6605 5.9836 0.0277 2.5163 0.0237 2.5400 0.6765 0.0223 0.6987 2,873.081 0 2,873.081
0 0.0772 0.2109 2,937.867
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1607 of 2362

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0543 2.3038 0.7408 0.0111 0.4066 0.0123 0.4189 0.1170 0.0118 0.1288 1,201.141 4 1,201.141
4 0.0418 0.1726 1,253.633
4 Worker 0.5302 0.3567 5.2428 0.0165 2.1097 0.0114 2.1211 0.5595 0.0105 0.5699 1,671.939 6 1,671.939
6 0.0354 0.0383 1,684.234
1 Total 0.5845 2.6605 5.9836 0.0277 2.5163 0.0237 2.5400 0.6765 0.0223 0.6987 2,873.081 0 2,873.081
0 0.0772 0.2109 2,937.867
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1608 of 2362

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.9118 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8269 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0530 0.0357 0.5243 1.6500e0030.2110 1.1400e0030.2121 0.0559 1.0500e0030.0570 167.1940 167.1940 3.5400e0033.8300e003168.4234 Total 0.0530 0.0357 0.5243 1.6500e0030.2110 1.1400e0030.2121 0.0559 1.0500e0030.0570 167.1940 167.1940 3.5400e0033.8300e003168.4234 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1609 of 2362

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.9118 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8269 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0530 0.0357 0.5243 1.6500e0030.2110 1.1400e0030.2121 0.0559 1.0500e0030.0570 167.1940 167.1940 3.5400e0033.8300e003168.4234 Total 0.0530 0.0357 0.5243 1.6500e0030.2110 1.1400e0030.2121 0.0559 1.0500e0030.0570 167.1940 167.1940 3.5400e0033.8300e003168.4234 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1610 of 2362

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 110.5015 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 110.6724 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1060 0.0713 1.0486 3.3100e0030.4219 2.2800e0030.4242 0.1119 2.1000e0030.1140 334.3879 334.3879 7.0700e0037.6600e003336.8468 Total 0.1060 0.0713 1.0486 3.3100e0030.4219 2.2800e0030.4242 0.1119 2.1000e0030.1140 334.3879 334.3879 7.0700e0037.6600e003336.8468 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1611 of 2362

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 110.5015 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 110.6724 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1060 0.0713 1.0486 3.3100e0030.4219 2.2800e0030.4242 0.1119 2.1000e0030.1140 334.3879 334.3879 7.0700e0037.6600e003336.8468 Total 0.1060 0.0713 1.0486 3.3100e0030.4219 2.2800e0030.4242 0.1119 2.1000e0030.1140 334.3879 334.3879 7.0700e0037.6600e003336.8468 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1612 of 2362

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.7691 4.2498 39.7899 0.0911 10.6118 0.0657 10.6775 2.8269 0.0610 2.8880 9,292.945 9 9,292.945
9 0.6208 0.3890 9,424.387
0 Unmitigated 3.7691 4.2498 39.7899 0.0911 10.6118 0.0657 10.6775 2.8269 0.0610 2.8880 9,292.945 9 9,292.945
9 0.6208 0.3890 9,424.387
0 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Industrial Park 3.58 3.58 3.58 14,217 14,217
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1,172.60 1,172.60 1172.60 5,025,432 5,025,432 User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,176.18 1,176.18 1,176.18 5,039,649 5,039,649
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Industrial Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 79 19 2 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1613 of 2362
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
User Defined Industrial 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1614 of 2362
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5800e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9791 316.9791 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5800e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9791 316.9791 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Industrial Park 2020.25 0.0218 0.1981 0.1664 1.1900e0030.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 237.6767 237.6767 4.5600e0034.3600e003239.0891 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
674.07 7.2700e0030.0661 0.0555 4.0000e0045.0200e0035.0200e0035.0200e0035.0200e00379.3024 79.3024 1.5200e0031.4500e00379.7737 User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5900e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9790 316.9790 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1615 of 2362

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Industrial Park 2.02025 0.0218 0.1981 0.1664 1.1900e0030.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 237.6767 237.6767 4.5600e0034.3600e003239.0891 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

0.67407 7.2700e0030.0661 0.0555 4.0000e0045.0200e0035.0200e0035.0200e0035.0200e00379.3024 79.3024 1.5200e0031.4500e00379.7737 User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0291 0.2642 0.2219 1.5900e0030.0201 0.0201 0.0201 0.0201 316.9790 316.9790 6.0800e0035.8100e003318.8627 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1616 of 2362
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Unmitigated 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618

0.9082 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

7.0807 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.0105 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Total 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1617 of 2362

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.9082 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

7.0807 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.0105 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Total 7.9994 1.0400e0030.1144 1.0000e0054.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0044.1000e0040.2458 0.2458 6.4000e0040.2618 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1618 of 2362

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 4/23/2024 1:20 PM 15517 - 1101 California - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1619 of 2362
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigationand RemediationStrategies
LitigationSupport and Testifying Expert
IndustrialStormwaterCompliance
CEQAReview
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

ProfessionalCertifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
ProfessionalExperience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); Attachment B
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1620 of 2362
2 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vaporintrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications forlarge solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Seniorresearcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Seniorresearcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1621 of 2362
3 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1622 of 2362
4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1623 of 2362
5 principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peerreview of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1624 of 2362
6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1625 of 2362
7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1626 of 2362
8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1627 of 2362

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Focus on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years of experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Attachment C
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1628 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 12 October 2022
Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Rosenfeld P. E., Spaeth K., Hallman R., Bressler R., Smith, G., (2022) Cancer Risk and Diesel Exhaust Exposure Among Railroad Workers. Water Air Soil Pollution. 233, 171.

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1629 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 12 October 2022
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1630 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1631 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1632 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1633 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1634 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 12 October 2022
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2022
In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022
In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Ralls, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CC0020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022
In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CC03191
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022
In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022
In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:21-cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1635 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 12 October 2022
In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiff vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022
In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022

In the Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No.16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1636 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 12 October 2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021
In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-28-2021
In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021

In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Case No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1637 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 11 of 12 October 2022
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19

In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1638 of 2362
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 12 of 12 October 2022
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No. RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015
In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1639 of 2362
Green Jobs & Clean Communities
P.O. Box 79222
Corona, CA 92877
May 17, 2024
Kevin Beery
Senior Planner
City of Redlands
Re: 1101 California Street Warehouse (SCH NO. 2024031107) Dear Mr. Beery:

On behalfofthe Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance ("GSEJA"), I am writing to you regarding the 1101 California Street Warehouse (SCH NO. 2024031107) ("Project").

GSEJA is withdrawing its comment letter and opposition to the Project. The Project's developer has addressed GSEJA's concerns about environmental mitigation.

Sincerely,
geoi
D' �ector
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1640 of 2362
From: Alisha C. Pember
To: Kevin Beery; Brian Desatnik; planning
Cc: Kelilah D. Federman
Subject: Comments on Mitigated Negative Declaration for 1101 California Street Warehouse (Lot Merger No. 8; Planned Development No. 7) (SCH No. 2024031107)
Date: Monday, April 29, 2024 17:20:52
Attachments: 7177-004acp - 1101 Cal. St. Warehouse MND Comments and Exhibits A-B.pdf [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Redlands -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Good afternoon,
Please find attached Comments on Mitigated Negative Declaration for 1101 California Street Warehouse (Lot Merger No. 8; Planned Development No. 7) (SCH No. 2024031107) and Exhibits A-B.

We are also providing a Dropbox link containing supporting references:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/rmzwxvvdaiyrp4aue8o6n/AFGKL6IUfNkA5H7ippjedlo? rlkey=zrg04nsesrdq8muq9olchavzz&st=5578n21n&dl=0
A hard copy of our Comments and Exhibits A-B will be sent via overnight delivery.

If you have any questions, please contact Kelilah Federman.

Thank you.

Alisha Pember
Alisha C. Pember
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 589-1660 voice, Ext. 24
[email protected]
___________________
This e-mail may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1641 of 2362
7177-004acp

ARIANA ABEDIFARD
KEVIN T. CARMICHAEL
CHRISTINA M. CARO
THOMAS A. ENSLOW
KELILAH D. FEDERMAN
RICHARD M. FRANCO
ANDREW J. GRAF
TANYA A. GULESSERIAN
DARION N. JOHNSTON
RACHAEL E. KOSS
AIDAN P. MARSHALL
TARA C. RENGIFO
Of Counsel
MARC D. JOSEPH
DANIEL L. CARDOZO

SACRAMENTO OFFICE
520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 350
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4721
TEL: (916) 444 - 6201
FAX: (916) 444 - 6209

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
601 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 - 7037
___________
TEL: (650) 589 - 1660
FAX: (650) 589 - 5062
[email protected]
printed on recycled paper
April 29, 2024
Via Email and Overnight Mail
Kevin Beery, Senior Planner
City of Redlands
Planning Division
P.O. Box 3005
Redlands, CA 92373-1505
Email: [email protected]
Brian Desatnik, Director
Development Services Department
City of Redlands
35 Cajon Street, Suite 20
Redlands, CA 92373
Email: [email protected];
[email protected]
Re: Comments on Mitigated Negative Declaration for 1101 California Street Warehouse (Lot Merger No. 8; Planned Development No. 7) (SCH No. 2024031107)
Dear Mr. Beery, Mr. Desatnik:

On behalf of Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”), we submit these comments on the Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) prepared by the City of Redlands (“City”) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) 1, for the 1101 California Street Warehouse Project (SCH No. 2024031107) (“Project”), proposed by CRP/NPP Redlands Industrial Owner, LLC (“Applicant”).

The Project proposes the construction of a 357,610 square-foot (“SF”) warehouse that will include 6,000 SF of Administration/Office Space.2 The Project Site is located at 1101 California St, Redlands, California 92374 on the southwest corner of Lugonia Avenue and California Street and includes two Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 0292-033-11 and 0292-033-13, in the County of San Bernardino.3 The Project site is located in an area designated by the Redlands General Plan as Commercial/Industrial and within the Special Development (“EV/SD”) district of the 1 Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000 et seq. 2 City of Redlands, Initial Study for 1101 California Street Warehouse (March 26, 2024), p. 1. [hereinafter “MND”). 3 MND, p. 1.

Letter 11
11-1
11-2
Redlands Regular meeting of 07-16-24 1642 of 2362
April 29, 2024

Page 2 ends

Redlands City CouncilJuly 16, 2024

Redlands City Council
July 16, 2024