Cities Index.
Agenda

Richmond City Council
May 17, 2022

Document
Agenda
Meeting
May 17, 2022
Body
Richmond City Council
Pages
1,759
Original file
285.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-richmond.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

4 12. TERMINATION.

Either Party may terminate this Agreement by providing written notice to the other. Any termination hereunder shall become effective immediately upon receipt of written notice of termination; provided, however, that Special Counsel may exercise its right of termination only to the extent and under terms and conditions consistent with the obligations of Special Counsel under the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California; and provided, that in the event of termination, the amount due Special Counsel for services rendered and costs and expenses incurred prior to termination shall remain due and payable. Special Counsel agrees to turn over to any attorney substituted in its place, the entire file and attorney work product regarding any such matter within seven (7) days of any such termination.

13. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.

A. No member of the governing body of the City, and no other officer, employee or agent of the City who exercises any discretion, function or responsibility in connection with the carrying out of any project to which this Agreement pertains, shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement.

B. Special Counsel agrees to secure the informed written consent of the City Attorney before accepting any representation adverse to the City (actual or apparent) during the term of this Agreement, and to forego the representation if the City Attorney, in his or her sole discretion, objects for any reason. This provision is intended to provide rights to the City above and beyond the rights Special Counsel owes to the City under all applicable rules of professional conduct relating to conflict of interest.

14. ASSIGNMENTS AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST.

City and Special Counsel bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, executors and administrators to the terms of this Agreement. Except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement, no interest in this Agreement or any of the work provided for in this Agreement shall be assigned or transferred, either voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of the City Attorney.

15. AUDITS, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTATION.

A. The City and any other federal, State or local governmental agency, and any of their authorized auditors or representatives, including auditors, shall have access to, and the right to audit and reproduce any of Special Counsel's records to the extent the City or such other governmental agency deems necessary to ensure that City is paying only the amounts to which Special Counsel is properly entitled or for other purposes relating to the Agreement. Special Counsel shall assist the City in responding to any requests from the City’s auditors, and Special Counsel shall not bill the City for any time spent responding to any such audit requests.

Page 955 of 1760 ends

5 B. Special Counsel shall maintain complete and accurate records of the services provided to City and expenses incurred on behalf of City. Special Counsel shall maintain and preserve all such records for at least three (3) years after termination of the Agreement or until an audit has been completed and accepted in writing by City.

Upon written notice by the City, the Special Counsel shall promptly make all such records available to auditors or other representatives of the City or other governmental agencies.

16. NON-DISCRIMINATION.

A. Special Counsel agrees to observe the provisions of Section 2.28.030 of the Municipal Code of the City of Richmond, obligating every contractor or subcontractor under a contract or subcontract with the City of Richmond for services to refrain from discriminatory employment or subcontracting practices on the basis of the race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, religious creed, national origin or ancestry of any employee, any applicant for employment or any potential subcontractor. Said Section 2.28.030 is, by this reference, a part of this Agreement.

B. If Special Counsel is found in violation of the nondiscrimination provisions of the State of California Fair Employment Practices Act or similar provisions of federal law or executive order in the performance of this Agreement, it will be in default of this Agreement. Thereupon, City will have the power to cancel or suspend this Agreement, in whole or in part.

17. HOLD HARMLESS/INDEMNIFICATION.

Special Counsel agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, release and defend to the maximum extent permitted by law, and covenants not to sue, the City, its City Council and each member thereof, and its officers, employees, commission members and representatives, from any and all liability, loss, suits, claims, damages, costs, judgments and expenses (including attorney’s fees and costs of litigation) which in whole or in part result from, or arise out of, any negligent acts, errors or omissions (including, without limitation, professional negligence) of Special Counsel, its employees, representatives, subcontractors, or agents in connection with the performance of this Agreement. This Agreement to indemnify, hold harmless, release and defend includes, but is not limited to, personal injury (including death at any time) and property or other damage (including, but without limitation, contract or tort or patent, copyright, trade secret or trademark infringement) sustained by any person or persons (including, but not limited to, companies, or corporations, Special Counsel and its employees or agents, and members of the general public).

18. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.

Page 956 of 1760 ends

6 Special Counsel shall maintain in full force and effect the following insurance policies:

A. Commercial general liability policy (bodily injury and property damage); B. Worker’s compensation/employer’s liability policy;
C. Business automobile liability insurance policy; and, D. Professional liability policy.

Said policies shall be maintained with respect to employees and vehicles assigned to the performance of work under this Agreement with coverage amounts, endorsements, certificates of insurance and coverage verifications as defined in Exhibit G, attached to this Agreement and incorporated by this reference.

19. CONFIDENTIALITY AND MEDIA STATEMENTS.

The data, information and reports acquired or prepared by Special Counsel in connection with matters upon which the City has retained Special Counsel shall not be shown or distributed to any other public or private person or entity except as authorized by the City Attorney and in no event prior to having been first disclosed to the City Attorney. All information, documents, records, reports, data or other materials furnished by City to Special Counsel or other such information, documents, records, data or other materials to which the Special Counsel has access during its performance pursuant to this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall remain the property of City. Special Counsel shall not make oral or written disclosure of such documents or materials, other than as necessary for its performance under this Agreement, without the prior written approval of the City Attorney. Special Counsel shall not provide any written or oral statements to the media without the prior written authorization of the City Attorney.

20. AMENDMENTS.

This Agreement, including any Exhibits attached to it, represents the entire understanding of the Parties as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may be modified only by a written amendment duly executed by the Parties to this Agreement.

21. ENGAGEMENT OF OTHER COUNSEL, SPECIALISTS, OR EXPERTS.

Special Counsel will not engage or otherwise incur an obligation to pay other counsel, specialists, or experts for services in connection with this Agreement without the prior written approval of the City Attorney.

22. NOTICES.

All notices, pleadings, reports or other communication to the Parties shall be properly sent via electronic mail to [email protected] and to Special Counsel at its principal place of business listed on page one of this Agreement.

Page 957 of 1760 ends

7 Either Party may change its address for receipt of notices under this Agreement by notice given in the manner provided herein.

23. LAW GOVERNING AGREEMENT.

This Agreement shall be interpreted under the laws of the State of California. All claims or controversies arising out of or related to performance under this Agreement shall be submitted to and resolved in a forum within Contra Costa County.

24. INVALID PROVISIONS.

If any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, in full or in part, then such provision shall be modified to the minimum extent necessary to make the provision legal, valid and enforceable, and the other provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby.

25. LICENSE REQUIREMENTS.

Special Counsel shall demonstrate that the attorney(s) who provide legal services to City under this Agreement are licensed to practice law in the State of California and, if not, indicate to the satisfaction of the City Attorney why such license is not required to perform the services required.

26. SANCTUARY CITY CONTRACTING ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE
STATEMENT.

Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of the Richmond Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance (SCCO, Ordinance No. 12-18). Contractor must submit the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement included herein as Exhibit F along with the bid or proposal prior to execution of the contract.

Page 958 of 1760 ends

8 The Parties acknowledge and accept the terms and conditions of this Agreement as evidenced by the following signatures of their duly authorized representatives. It is the intent of the Parties that this Agreement shall become operative on the Effective Date.

BOUCHER LAW, PC
By:_______________________________
Title:_____________________________

CITY OF RICHMOND
____________________________
Mayor/ City Manager
Name:______________________
____
_____
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
City Attorney
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk

Page 959 of 1760 ends

Exhibit A
9 SCOPE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE OF FEES & CHARGES
Scope of work:

Special Counsel shall conduct confidential personnel investigations.

City of Richmond Contact Attorney: Shannon L. Moore, Sr. Assistant City Attorney Schedule of Fees & Charges:

Hourly Rates
PARTNER(S) $325/hour
PARALEGAL(S) $225/hour

COMPENSATION
Only those costs and expenses set forth in Section III of Exhibit "B", entitled "Reimbursements" shall be paid to Special Counsel.

Total compensation for legal services and reimbursements shall be charged in accordance with Exhibits "A" and "B" and shall not exceed the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) for attorneys’ fees and reimbursements.

Page 960 of 1760 ends

Exhibit B
10 BILLING PROTOCOLS/GUIDELINES
The City of Richmond (“City”) has adopted the following protocols for billing, budgeting, and planning for projects involving outside counsel. Special Counsel will be required to comply with this protocol. If you have questions concerning it, please contact the City Attorney for clarification. In the event you wish to negotiate changes due to the internal operation of your firm, please raise them in writing as soon as possible. Any changes to this protocol will need prior, written approval from the City Attorney. In the interest of fairness, all Special Counsel is required to comply with this protocol. This protocol is also to be used in conjunction with any new proposal for services.

These protocols and guidelines are instituted to ensure that Special Counsel conveys the information necessary for the City Attorney to manage outside projects and litigation.

Also, because these guidelines are set out in advance, they are designed to minimize any confusion or misunderstanding. Compliance with these guidelines should enhance the attorney-client relationship. If you have any comments or suggestions that could improve this system, please feel free to contact the City Attorney.

I. BILLING FORMAT
Unless otherwise agreed, the following information must be provided in monthly bills:
a. A detailed description of work, in time increments of .1 hour (one tenth of an hour) for and by each and every individual billing services. b. Identification of the lawyer who is in charge of the matter. c. Reasonably detailed disbursement breakdowns with backup documentation of any individual charge exceeding $100.00.
d. Each billing item must be separately stated on a separate line identifying the individual performing the services, the time spent and the exact nature of the service rendered.
e. When charges are made for research time, the specific issue being researched and the need for the research should be identified.
f. Each item billed should be coded to a specific litigation budget line item, if applicable.
g. The City Attorney reserves the right to request various levels of detail and specific formats (such as columnar comparisons with established budgets).

II. BILLING GUIDELINES

Page 961 of 1760 ends

Exhibit B
11 a. All tasks set forth in Special Counsel’s billing documentation shall be specific and detailed. Overly generalized listings of task descriptions such as “review contract” or “prepare for negotiations” are not acceptable. b. Billings under this Agreement shall not be provided in more than six (6) minute increments and shall represent the devotion of a full six minutes before an increment is billed. Under no circumstances shall Special Counsel use “block billing” procedures, wherein a list or series of activities is done each day with only an aggregate amount of time specified. c. Special Counsel shall keep the City advised of the identity and billing rates of those people working on the project account.
d. All time shall be billed within 30 days of the end of the month in which services were performed.
e. Counsel shall advise City whenever it anticipates the amount of services necessary to properly execute the task will exceed the amount of the contract.

When accrued billings are equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Payment Limit, written notice shall be given to the City as soon as possible, via e-mail, to the City Attorney’s Office, of this fact. In order to satisfy this notification requirement, Counsel shall monitor its accrued billings on a weekly basis and immediately notify the City Attorney if the eighty percent (80%) threshold is met. Special Counsel acknowledges the fiscal constraints on City funding and therefore Special Counsel assumes risk of non-payment for services rendered in the event the amount of services rendered exceeds the amount of the contract unless prior written authorization is received. Authorization to exceed the amount set forth in Exhibit A may be given only by City Attorney in writing.
f. Only those attorneys approved by the City may bill on the case. g. The City expects the attorney assigned to the case to handle all significant matters in the litigation. The City Attorney must approve in advance the assignment of other attorneys to the litigation or project. The City may request that the assigned work be instead handled by the primary attorney. h. Special Counsel shall not charge for more than one attorney at any hearing, deposition, or meeting of any kind without advance approval of the City Attorney.
i. No more than two paraprofessionals may bill on a particular case without the prior approval of the City.
j. The City has retained Special Counsel for its expertise, and therefore expects not to be billed for introductory or background research. City appreciates when Special Counsel has researched an issue previously and uses that research on present cases or projects. Do not charge the City for work Special Counsel has done and billed another client for in the past.

Page 962 of 1760 ends

Exhibit B
12 k. Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Agreement, Special Counsel shall provide any manuals or policies describing Special Counsel’s billing practices.
l. The City does not allow “double billing” of any sort. If Special Counsel is working on another client’s matter, do not bill City for that time. This applies to travel time or any other matter.
m. Training time is not billable. Law clerks may be used only with prior approval.
n. City will not pay for new attorneys to “get up to speed” on a file unless it has been preapproved.
o. If a matter arises that requires Special Counsel to open a new file, the City Attorney should be informed immediately.
p. City reserves the right to require additional substantiation of any item of claimed expense.

III.REIMBURSEMENTS
a. The City will reimburse Special Counsel for the following expenses, and for no other expenses:
 Actual printing costs;
 Copying costs at $.12 / page (for legal documents and file materials, but not library materials);
 Actual cost of postage (including express mail delivery charges);  Facsimile charges at the rate of $0.25 per page;
 Computer research support services (e.g., Westlaw, LEXIS or computer time or services) at actual cost, but not to exceed 15% of the total fees for all legal services;
 Actual cost of long distance telephone calls;
 Transcription and reporter's fees; and
 Reasonable travel. The City does not pay for meals unless Attorney is required to be away from office for one full day. All meals and/or travel reimbursements will be subject to approval by the City Attorney. Travel expenses are limited to the lesser of actual expenses or expenses that would be authorized for City employee travel pursuant to City policy. b. The City Attorney must approve in advance any single reimbursement item in excess of $250.
c. Any expense other than those listed in section “a.” must be approved by the City Attorney in writing and in advance in an approved budget. d. No compensation shall be allowed for administrative overhead or premiums added to the direct cost of research support or other services. e. Court filings shall be prepared in a timely manner so that “rush” or “expedited” messenger fees are not incurred.

Page 963 of 1760 ends

Exhibit B
13 f. Messenger and other charges in excess of actual costs are not permitted. City does not allow cost, plus a percentage, for actual outside costs g. City does not pay for secretarial time or secretarial overtime. City does not pay attorneys or paralegals for secretarial tasks or tasks that should not be included in Special Counsel’s overhead. For example, faxing, mailing, arranging for messengers and calendaring are not acceptable charges. h. City does not pay for billing or discussions of bills, including discussions initiated by the City or City’s requests for additional information about a bill. i. The practice of minimum billing charges is prohibited. Please charge for actual time spent. For example, a minimum of .2 for phone calls or .4 for letters is unreasonable unless it is an accurate measure of time spent. j. Do not charge for file opening or file closing. These are not true legal services, tasks or adequate descriptions of legal activities.

Page 964 of 1760 ends

Exhibit C
14 PROJECT PLAN AND BUDGET
Project plans and budgets should conform to the following guidelines:
a. The project plan shall include a projection of recommended strategies and actions to be taken in the project and a range of costs for each such strategy or action. b. If the scope of work includes representation of the City in litigation, the project plan shall include the following elements, with explanations:
 Anticipated total costs;
 The primary issues;
 The probability of success; and
 A settlement/trial recommendation
The project plan will be modified during the litigation as the need arises. c. The project budget shall include an estimate of the attorneys' hours and fees and disbursements during each phase and/or activity. All anticipated expenses must be listed and costs estimated.
d. In the event of litigation, the project budget shall include, but not be limited to, estimates for:
 Pre-commencement (legal and factual research for the complaint or answer);  Pleadings;
 Preliminary motions;
 Initial discovery;
 Factual investigation of merits (interviewing clients, employees and third parties);
 Review and abstract City's documents;
 Expert (non-medical) investigation and reports;
 Medical experts and examinations;
 Legal research on merits;
 More thorough discovery (including the identity of deponents and expected costs of each deposition and preparation);
 Settlement negotiations;
 Trial preparation; and
 Trial.
e. The project budget should include the anticipated cost of each line item, the time allotted to complete it and the professional level of the person handling it. f. The project budget is not a fixed fee agreement and is subject to revision. g. Special Counsel shall provide revisions to the project plan or budget at the request of the City Attorney.
h. Special Counsel understands and agrees that major unjustified deviations from the project budget, or failure to timely submit a project budget or revisions, if requested, may constitute a breach and result in termination of this Agreement.

Page 965 of 1760 ends

Exhibit D
15 California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority
Mandatory Case Reporting Policy
Pursuant to Section VII (Conditions) of the Memorandum of Coverage, the following rule is applicable to all cases reported to CJPRMA.

The Authority shall be entitled to complete access to the covered party’s claim file, the defense attorney’s complete file, and all investigation material and reports, including all evaluations and information on negotiations. The covered party shall be responsible to report the progress of the litigation and any significant developments at least quarterly to the Authority, and to provide the Authority with simultaneous copies of all correspondence provided to the covered party by its defense attorneys and/or its agents.

In addition, the CJPRMA Board of Directors has adopted the following mandatory case reporting standards:
1) Defense counsel is expected to provide a written analysis of liability and exposure in any reported claim no later than ninety days following receipt of the file from the member agency. CJPRMA understands that the liability picture may develop as discovery is ongoing, but this does not excuse the responsibility of providing an early, objective analysis of the file, subject to later developments. An early analysis not only permits the JPA member to set an accurate reserve level, but also permits the member entity to decide whether to actively litigate the case, try to settle the case, or limit discovery based upon the exposure.
2) The initial status report should provide, at a minimum, a brief synopsis of the facts giving rise to the lawsuit; the status of the pleadings, including any discussions of demurrers or motions to dismiss, or cross-complaints; a summary and analysis of plaintiff’s injuries, damages and exposures in the case; an initial impression of liability; any requests for additional investigation; a brief outline of the discovery planned; and an evaluation of anticipated litigation costs. The report need not be lengthy, and typically might not exceed three to five pages, but must address the issues directly and in a straightforward manner so that the member entity and CJPRMA can set cost and loss reserves as necessary.
3) Defense counsel is responsible to report, in writing, the setting of a trial date, settlement conference date, hearing date on motion for summary judgment or similar dispositive motion in any litigated case, within one week of the date on which a court establishes such date.
4) Defense counsel is responsible to report, in writing, all settlement demands or offers within one week of the time the offer is made or the demand is received.

Page 966 of 1760 ends

Exhibit D
16 5) Defense counsel is responsible to report, in writing, on the substance of all depositions taken in the case. This need not be a multi-page deposition summary, but must, at a minimum, include a concise report of major events occurring at the deposition, and an evaluation of the effect of the deposition testimony on the case. 6) Finally, no later than sixty days before the date set for trial in any case, defense counsel is responsible to report, in writing, on (1) an assessment of liability in the case, (2) the adverse potential exposure if liability is found, (3) a concise summary of injuries sustained and/or claims, (4) an assessment of any other factors (such as local jury tendencies, appearance of important witnesses, etc.) that may affect the liability analysis or exposure assessment, and (5) an opinion on the settlement value of the case. 7) All status reports from defense counsel must be copied to the CJPRMA Board member whose entity is involved in the claim.

This policy is designed to protect the member entity and CJPRMA, so that they can make informed litigation decisions on reported cases. Past experience has shown that defense counsel retained by the member entities of CJPRMA are high-caliber, hard working attorneys who have done very well for their clients, and CJPRMA is grateful for their efforts. Defense counsel are cautioned, however, that case reporting is given a high priority by CJPRMA and its members, and is a major consideration in evaluating counsel’s performance.

Page 967 of 1760 ends

Exhibit E
17 LITIGATION GUIDELINES
The following guidelines should be followed when the scope of work includes representing the City in litigation:
a. The Special Counsel shall consult the City Attorney regarding the component parts of litigation handled so that the City Attorney, in consultation with the City Council, if necessary, can determine whether a particular activity is reasonable in light of its costs and benefits.
b. The City Attorney must approve the identity and number of staff assigned to the litigation, and any changes.
c. All pleadings shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review prior to filing. d. Copies of major work product, pleadings, motions, orders, decisions, research memoranda, reports on significant developments, and quarterly status reports shall be submitted to keep the City Attorney advised of any major developments in the lawsuit.

Such copies shall be provided in electronic format compatible with software in the City Attorney’s office.
e. Generally, the City Attorney will rely upon Special Counsel for guidance on litigation strategy. Nonetheless, prior approval from the City Attorney is necessary for demurrers, motions for summary judgment and discovery motions.
f. City expects that Special Counsel will resolve all discovery disputes without court intervention. If this is impossible due to the conduct of others, please inform the City Attorney immediately. City’s intent is to have discovery be fair and open with the money spent on reviewing relevant items that are discovered, not on discovery battles. g. Provide full descriptions of legal tasks performed. This will help the City Attorney follow case development and understand Firm’s strategy. h. Some types of litigation-related expenses require prior approval by the City Attorney, including, but not limited to, experts and investigators. Expenses over a certain dollar amount always require prior approval. See Section III (Reimbursements) of Exhibit B (Billing Protocols and Guidelines) of this Agreement for a list of those expenses that may be reimbursed.

Page 968 of 1760 ends

Exhibit F
18 SANCTUARY CITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
The undersigned, an authorized agent of (hereafter
"Contractor"), has had an opportunity to review the requirements of City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 (hereafter "Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance" or “SCCO”). Contractor understands and agrees that the City may choose with whom it will maintain business relations and may refrain from contracting with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”).

Contractor understands the meaning of the following terms used in the SCCO:
a. "Data Broker” means either of the following:
i. The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector business and government agencies;
ii. The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose from that for which it is ultimately used.
b. “Extreme Vetting” means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar services."
Contractor understands that it is not eligible to receive or retain a City contract if at the time the Contract is executed, or at any time during the term of the Contract, it provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE.

Contractor further understands and agrees that Contractor's failure to comply with the SCCO shall constitute a material default of the Contract and the City Manager may terminate the Contract and bar Contractor from bidding on future contracts with the City for five (5) years from the effective date of the contract termination.

By executing this Statement, Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of the SCCO and that if at any time during the term of the Contract it ceases to comply, Contractor will promptly notify the City Manager in writing.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day of , 20 , at _________ , California.

Printed Name: Title:

Signed: Date:

Business Entity:

Vendor SCCO Compliance Statement (Augt2020)

Page 969 of 1760 ends

Exhibit G
19 City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:

Professional Services
In all instances where CONTRACTOR or its representatives will provide professional services (architects, engineers, construction management, counselors, medical professionals, hospitals, clinics, attorneys, consultants, accountants, etc.) to the City of Richmond (City), the City requires the following MINIMUM insurance requirements and limits.

CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract, agreement, or other order for work, services or supplies, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the contract. Failure to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of contract.

CONTRACTOR agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which it has agreed to provide Commercial General Liability insurance, CONTRACTOR shall look solely to its insurance for recovery.

CONTRACTOR hereby grants to CITY, on behalf of any insurer providing Commercial General Liability insurance to either CONTRACTOR or CITY with respect to the services of CONSULTANT herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said CONTRACTOR may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Original, signed certificates and original, separate policy endorsements, naming the City as an additional insured for general liability coverage, as well as a waiver of subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance, shall be received and approved by the City before any work may begin. However, failure to do so shall not operate as a waiver of these insurance requirements.

City reserves the right to modify or require additional coverages for specific risk exposures depending on scope of CONTRACTORS work.

Minimum coverage is detailed below. The policy limits of coverage shall be made available to the full limits of the policy. The minimum limits stated herein shall not serve to reduce the policy limits of coverage of CONTRACTOR.

Minimum Scope of Insurance – the following forms shall be provided and coverage shall be at least as broad as the following:

1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001), and including coverage for bodily and personal injury, property damage, and products and completed operations (if applicable).

2. Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability coverage (ISO Form CA 0001, Code 1, Any Auto).

3. Original and Separate Additional Insured Endorsement for General Liability (ISO Form CG 20 10 11/85 or its equivalent) with primary and non-contributory language.

4. Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California including Employer’s Liability coverage.

5. Original and Separate Waiver of Subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance.

6. Professional Liability or Errors & Omissions Liability Insurance appropriate to the CONTRACTOR’s profession (if required.)
Required Coverage Minimum Limits
Workers’ Compensation and
Employers’ Liability
Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1 million Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease. If CONTRACTOR is self-insured, provide a certificate of Permission to SelfInsure, signed by the California Department of Industrial Relations and SelfInsurance. If contractor is a sole proprietor (has no employees) than contractor must sign “Contractor Release of Liability” found at:
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

General Liability
(primary and excess
limits combined)
$2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If the policy includes a general aggregate, either the general aggregate shall apply separately to this project, service or location or the minimum required aggregate limit shall be twice the per occurrence limit ($4 million aggregate limit).

Policy shall be endorsed to name the City of Richmond as an additional insured per the conditions detailed below.

Page 970 of 1760 ends

Exhibit G
20 City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:

Professional Services
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.

Professional Liability or Errors &
Omissions Liability –
Required for all professionals
including architects, engineers,
consultants, construction
management, counselors, medical
professionals, hospitals, clinics,
attorneys and accountants, & other
consultants as may be required by
the City.

PROJECT COST
$0 - $1 million
$1 million - $5 million
Over $5 million

REQUIRED LIMIT
$1 million p/o
$2 million p/o
$5 million p/o
Required Policy Conditions
Additional Insured Endorsement Applicable to General Liability coverage.

The City of Richmond, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be named as additional insureds for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured including bodily injury, deaths and property damage or destruction arising in any respect directly or indirectly in the performance of this contract.

ISO form CG 20 10 (11/85) or its equivalent is required. If the Contractor is supplying their product or providing a service then the endorsement must not exclude products and completed operations coverage. If it does, then CG 20 37 (10/01) is also required.

SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

Primary and Noncontributory The contractor’s insurance coverage must be primary coverage as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by the City is wholly separate from the insurance of the contractor and in no way relieves the contractor from its responsibility to provide insurance.

Waiver of Subrogation
Endorsement Form
Contractor’s insurer will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for Workers’ Compensation Insurance during the life of this contract.

SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

Deductibles and Self-Insured
Retentions
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City or the CONTRACTOR shall procure a financial guarantee in an amount equal to the deductible or self-insured retention guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

Contractor is responsible for satisfaction of the deductible and/or self-insured retention for each loss.

A. M. Best Rating A:VII or Better. If the A.M. Best Rating falls below the required rating, CONTRACTOR must replace coverage immediately and provide notice to City.

Umbrella/Excess Liability Policies
If an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy is used to meet the liability limits, coverage shall be as broad as specified for underlying coverage’s and cover those insured in the underlying policies.

Page 971 of 1760 ends

Exhibit G
21 City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:

Professional Services
Claims-Made Policies
If any insurance policy is written on a claims-made form: 1) the retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 2) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 3) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claimsmade policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase an extended period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.

Subcontractors
CONTRACTOR shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish to the City for review and approval, separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify the City of Richmond for any damage resulting to it from failure of either CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor to take out or maintain the required insurance policies. The fact that insurance is obtained by CONTRACTOR, and/or CONTRACTOR’s subcontractors, will not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of CONTRACTOR, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this contract. Damages recoverable by CITY from CONTRACTOR or any third party will not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage.

Verification of Coverage
All original certificates and endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work may begin. The City of Richmond reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies including endorsements affecting the coverage at any time.

Original insurance certificates and required policy endorsements shall be mailed or delivered to the Designated Project Manager for the City of Richmond.

Insurance certificates and endorsements may be faxed to the Designated Project Manager. However, CONTRACTOR must mail the original certificates and endorsements to Designated Project Manager once faxed.

Continuous Coverage
CONTRACTOR shall maintain the required insurance for the life of the contract. Should the CONTRACTOR cease to have insurance as required during this time, all work by the CONTRACTOR pursuant to this agreement shall cease until insurance acceptable to the City is provided. In the event that CONTRACTOR fails to comply with the City’s insurance requirements, the City may take such action as it deems necessary to protect the City’s interests. Such action may include but is not limited to termination of the contract, withholding of payments, or other actions as the City deems appropriate.

If services or the scope of work extend beyond the expiration dates of the required insurance policies initially approved by the City, CONTRACTOR must provide updated certificates and endorsements indicating that the required coverage, terms and conditions are still in place.

Renewal certificates and updated endorsements shall be mailed to the Designated Project Manager.

Cancellation
CONTRACTOR shall ensure that coverage shall not be cancelled, reduced or otherwise materially changed except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice has been given to the City.

Reporting Requirements
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

Consistent with Public Policy
The insuring provisions, insofar as they may be judged to be against public policy shall be void and unenforceable only to the minimum extent necessary so that the remaining terms and provisions herein may be consistent with public policy and thus enforceable

Page 972 of 1760 ends

1 LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF RICHMOND
AND
ELLIS INVESTIGATIONS, L.C.

PREAMBLE
This legal services agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into on this 22ND day of OCTOBER, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) by and between the City of Richmond, California, a chartered California municipal corporation (“City”), with its principal place of business located at 450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, California 94804 and ELLIS INVESTIGATIONS, L.C. comprised of attorneys who conduct personnel investigations (“Investigators” or “Special Counsel”) with its principal place of business located at 455 CAPITOL MALL, STE.205, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814. Investigators may be referred to herein individually as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties” or the “Parties to this Agreement.”

RECITALS
The following recitals are as follows:

A. City desires to secure professional services more fully described in this Agreement; and, B. Ellis Investigations, L.C. represents that it has the professional qualifications, expertise, necessary licenses and desire to provide legal services of the quality and type, which meet objectives, and requirements of City.

AGREEMENT PROVISIONS
The Parties agree as follows:

The Original Agreement shall be amended and replaced in its entirety to read as follows:

1. RETENTION OF FIRM.

City hereby retains and authorizes Ellis Investigations, L.C. to provide investigatory legal services as may be requested, from time to time in writing by the City Attorney on an asneeded basis.

2. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED.

See “Scope of Work” in Exhibit A.

3. TERM OF AGREEMENT.

The services of Ellis Investigations, L.C. are to commence upon OCTOBER 22, 2021 DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 973 of 1760 ends

2 and shall terminate on JUNE 30, 2023, unless the parties extend the Agreement in writing. The services shall be undertaken and completed in such sequence as to assure their completion as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care.

4. ASSIGNMENT OF DUTIES.

It is contemplated that no other attorney will be assigned from Special Counsel other than LESLIE ELLIS, KATE SVINARICH, TRACY LAW, TANIA SEANPANAH and LUCY LI. It is agreed by and between the Parties that should it be desirable for any attorney other than the attorneys listed above to work under this Agreement, such attorney may be added only with the express written consent of the City Attorney.

5. PUBLIC FUNDING.

Investigators and City mutually recognize that Investigator’s services under this Agreement are being paid for with tax dollars from citizens and taxpayers of the City of Richmond, California, and that, given this fact, a heightened duty of care exists in both Special Counsel and City to ensure that Investigators scrupulously adhere to principles of moderation, frugality and cost consciousness in carrying forth the goals of this Agreement. Special Counsel and each of its attorneys pledge themselves to scrupulously observe a duty of reasonableness and cost-effective representation in all aspects of this Agreement.

6. PAYMENT FOR SERVICE.

In consideration for Ellis Investigations, L.C.’s performance of legal services on behalf of City under the terms of this Agreement, the firm shall be compensated at the preapproved hourly rates and for authorized expenses set forth in the “Scope of Work and Schedule of Fees and Charges” set forth in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated by this reference.

Exhibit A may be amended from time to time by letter agreement duly signed and approved by the City Attorney.

7. BILLING INVOICES.

Ellis Investigations, L.C. shall, within thirty (30) days after the end of each month in which services are performed under this Agreement, submit to the City an itemized bill describing in detail the specific services performed as set forth in this Agreement. Special Counsel shall adhere to the Protocols and Guidelines set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated by this reference. The bill shall be electronically submitted to [email protected].

8. BILLING.

Ellis Investigations, L.C. shall scrupulously examine all bills submitted for services rendered under this Agreement to assure that appropriate billing judgment is employed in billing City for service. Ellis Investigations, L.C. shall not use legal professionals for DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 974 of 1760 ends

3 secretarial work and under no circumstances shall Investigators have lawyers billing for making copies, scheduling appointments or taking care of matters or work that would otherwise be work performed by an assistant or secretary.

9. TERMINATION.

Either Party may terminate this Agreement by providing written notice to the other. Any termination hereunder shall become effective immediately upon receipt of written notice of termination; provided, however, that Ellis Investigations, L.C. may exercise its right of termination only to the extent and under terms and conditions consistent with the obligations of attorneys under the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California; and provided, that in the event of termination, the amount due for services rendered and costs and expenses incurred prior to termination shall remain due and payable. Ellis Investigations, L.C. agrees to turn over to any attorney substituted in its place, the entire file and attorney work product regarding any such matter within seven (7) days of any such termination.

10. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.

No member of the governing body of the City, and no other officer, employee or agent of the City who exercises any discretion, function or responsibility in connection with the carrying out of any project to which this Agreement pertains, shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement.

11. ASSIGNMENTS AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST.

City and Ellis Investigations, L.C. bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, executors and administrators to the terms of this Agreement. Except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement, no interest in this Agreement or any of the work provided for in this Agreement shall be assigned or transferred, either voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of the City Attorney.

12. AUDITS, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTATION.

A. The City and any other federal, State or local governmental agency, and any of their authorized auditors or representatives, including auditors, shall have access to, and the right to audit and reproduce any of Special Counsel's records to the extent the City or such other governmental agency deems necessary to ensure that City is paying only the amounts to which Special Counsel is properly entitled or for other purposes relating to the Agreement.

Special Counsel shall assist the City in responding to any requests from the City’s auditors, and Special Counsel shall not bill the City for any time spent responding to any such audit requests.

B. Ellis Investigations, L.C. shall maintain complete and accurate records of the services provided to City and expenses incurred on behalf of City. Ellis DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 975 of 1760 ends

4 Investigations, L.C. shall maintain and preserve all such records for at least three (3) years after termination of the Agreement or until an audit has been completed and accepted in writing by City. Upon written notice by the City, Ellis Investigations, L.C. shall promptly make all such records available to auditors or other representatives of the City or other governmental agencies.

13. NON-DISCRIMINATION.

A. As set forth in Chapter 2.28 of Richmond Municipal Code, no discrimination will be made in the employment of any person under this Agreement because of race, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry.

Investigators agree to meet all requirements of the Richmond Municipal Code pertaining to nondiscrimination in employment.

B. If Ellis Investigations, L.C. is found in violation of the nondiscrimination provisions of the State of California Fair Employment Practices Act or similar provisions of federal law or executive order in the performance of this Agreement, it will be in default of this Agreement. Thereupon, City will have the power to cancel or suspend this Agreement, in whole or in part.

14. INDEMNIFICATION.

Special Counsel agrees to indemnify the City against all damages caused by Special Counsel’s intentional or negligent acts, errors or omissions (including, without limitation, professional negligence) in the performance of professional services. City agrees to indemnify the Special Counsel against all damages caused by the City’s intentional or negligent acts. Neither the Special Counsel nor the City shall be obligated to indemnify the other party in any manner whatsoever for the other party's negligence.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Special Counsel shall have no obligation to indemnify the City for any actions, claims, complaints, damages or demands, liability, costs, losses and expenses, actual or threatened, brought by an employee, agent or witness arising from the issues under investigation.

15. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.

Ellis Investigations, L.C. shall maintain in full force and effect the following insurance policies:

A. Commercial general liability policy (bodily injury and property damage); B. Worker’s compensation/employer’s liability policy;
C. Business automobile liability insurance policy; and, D. Professional liability policy.

Said policies shall be maintained with respect to employees and vehicles assigned to the performance of work under this Agreement with coverage amounts, endorsements, DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 976 of 1760 ends

5 certificates of insurance and coverage verifications as defined in Exhibit D, attached to this Agreement and incorporated by this reference.

16. CONFIDENTIALITY AND MEDIA STATEMENTS.

The data, information and reports acquired or prepared by Ellis Investigations, L.C. in connection with matters upon which the City has retained Ellis Investigations, L.C. shall not be shown or distributed to any other public or private person or entity except as authorized in writing by the City Attorney. All information, documents, records, reports, data or other materials furnished by City to Ellis Investigations, L.C. or other such information, documents, records, data or other materials to which the Ellis Investigations, L.C. has access during its performance pursuant to this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall remain the property of City. Ellis Investigations, L.C. shall not make oral or written disclosure of such documents or materials, other than as necessary for its performance under this Agreement, without the prior written approval of the City Attorney. Special Counsel shall not provide any written or oral statements to the media without the prior written authorization of the City Attorney.

17. AMENDMENTS.

This Agreement, including any Exhibits attached to it, represents the entire understanding of the Parties as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may be modified only by a written amendment duly executed by the Parties to this Agreement.

18. NOTICES.

All notices, pleadings, reports or other communication to the Parties shall be properly sent via electronic mail to [email protected] and to Special Counsel at its principal place of business listed on page one of this Agreement.

Either Party may change its address for receipt of notices under this Agreement by notice given in the manner provided herein.

19. LAW GOVERNING AGREEMENT.

This Agreement shall be interpreted under the laws of the State of California. All claims or controversies arising out of or related to performance under this Agreement shall be submitted to and resolved in a forum within Contra Costa County.

20. INVALID PROVISIONS.

If any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, in full or in part, then such provision shall be modified to the minimum extent necessary to make the provision legal, valid and enforceable, and the other provisions of this Agreement DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 977 of 1760 ends

6 shall not be affected thereby.

21. LICENSE REQUIREMENTS.

Special Counsel shall demonstrate that the attorney(s) who provide legal services to City under this Agreement are licensed to practice law in the State of California and, if not, indicate to the satisfaction of the City Attorney why such license is not required to perform the services required.

22. SANCTUARY CITY CONTRACTING ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE
STATEMENT.

Ellis Investigations, L.C. agrees to comply with the provisions of the Richmond Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance (SCCO, Ordinance No. 12-18). The firm must submit the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement included herein as Exhibit C along with the bid or proposal prior to execution of the contract.

23. COUNTERPARTS.

This Legal Services Agreement may be executed in counterparts each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 978 of 1760 ends

7 The Parties acknowledge and accept the terms and conditions of this Agreement as evidenced by the following signatures of their duly authorized representatives. It is the intent of the Parties that this Agreement shall become operative on the Effective Date.

ELLIS INVESTIGATIONS, L.C.

By:

Title: _______________________________
Date: _______________________________

CITY OF RICHMOND
____________________________
City Manager
Name:______________________
_
Date: _______________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
City Attorney
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
Leslie D. Ellis, Partner
11/8/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90 Laura Snideman
11/22/2021

Page 979 of 1760 ends

Exhibit A
8 SCOPE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE OF FEES & CHARGES
Scope of work:

Ellis Investigations, L.C. shall conduct confidential personnel investigations.

Scope of Engagement:

The City understands that there are no guarantees as to the outcome of the investigation. As an independent contractor, Special Counsel has the right to determine means, manner and findings related to the investigation. The City agrees to allow Special Counsel full discretion to undertake the investigation and otherwise make findings without influencing or interfering with the outcome. The City understands and acknowledges that Special Counsel will exercise independent judgment to make whatever findings it deems are warranted based on the evidence developed in the investigation, and that this engagement is not dependent on Special Counsel making or failing to make a particular credibility determination, finding of fact or conclusion.

After conducting relevant interviews and reviewing relevant documents and information, Special Counsel will, if requested by the City, prepare a written report summarizing the investigation and findings.

Legal Services:

It is understood that in this engagement, Special Counsel and the City have an attorney-client relationship and that Special Counsel is providing professional legal services based on its professional experience and expertise. Special Counsel has been retained to use its legal skills to assist the City in developing a response to the concerns. Specifically, Special Counsel will use its expertise in employment law to arrive at findings based on its professional evaluation of the evidence. The parties intend that the investigation, including Special Counsel’s communications, work product and final investigation report, will be covered by the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product protections to the extent legally permissible, unless waived by the City.

Limited Scope Agreement:

The scope of this attorney-client representation is limited. Special Counsel will render legal advice to the City on issues limited to the investigation process. Special Counsel will conduct the investigation as an attorney in furtherance of the City seeking legal advice to resolve the underlying issues. The City will seek legal advice, as appropriate, from other counsel regarding what action to take as a result of the investigation. The scope of the investigation does not include rendering any legal conclusions, making recommendations or, in the event of litigation or administrative claim, representation of the City or anyone else involved in the litigation or claim.

Specifically, the City expressly agrees that it will look to its regular legal counsel for such services, as well as for advice with respect to issues which may arise relating to the investigation.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 980 of 1760 ends

Exhibit A
9 This includes, without limitation: (1) the admonitions, if any, to be made to employees who are interviewed concerning confidentiality; (2) the consequences of employee failure to cooperate in the investigation; (3) the accessing of electronic and other data; (4) document retention; (5) litigation holds; (6) appropriate interim employment measures pending investigation; (7) compliance with the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act; and (8) compliance with the California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act. The City agrees it will comply with employerrequired notice and consent rules to the extent applicable, including those under Civil Code sections 1786 et seq.

The City also agrees it will look to its regular legal counsel for advice with respect to issues of attorney-client privilege, scope of privilege, waiver and work product in connection with Special Counsel’s services.

Other Work:

If called upon in the future to testify, respond to discovery about the engagement, or defend the confidentiality of the investigation in any proceeding City agrees to pay Firm for work related to such testimony or discovery at then applicable current rates for such work. In the event of a rate increase, Special Counsel will notify the City in writing before any increase becomes effective.

Attorneys’ fees for the investigator’s separate counsel in the event of the need to respond to discovery, prepare for or testify about the investigation.” Hourly Rates:

LESLIE ELLIS $435/hour
OTHER ATTORNEY INVESTIGATORS $315-435/hour
LEGAL SUPPORT SPECIALIST $185/hour

COMPENSATION
Only those costs and expenses set forth in Section III of Exhibit "B", entitled "Reimbursements" shall be paid to Special Counsel.

Total compensation for legal services and reimbursements shall be charged in accordance with Exhibits "A" and "B" and shall not exceed the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 981 of 1760 ends

Exhibit B
10 BILLING PROTOCOLS/GUIDELINES
The City of Richmond (“City”) has adopted the following protocols for billing, budgeting, and planning for projects involving outside counsel. Special Counsel will be required to comply with this protocol. If you have questions concerning it, please contact the City Attorney for clarification. In the event you wish to negotiate changes due to the internal operation of your firm, please raise them in writing as soon as possible. Any changes to this protocol will need prior, written approval from the City Attorney. In the interest of fairness, all Special Counsel is required to comply with this protocol. This protocol is also to be used in conjunction with any new proposal for services.

These protocols and guidelines are instituted to ensure that Special Counsel conveys the information necessary for the City Attorney to manage outside projects and litigation. Also, because these guidelines are set out in advance, they are designed to minimize any confusion or misunderstanding. Compliance with these guidelines should enhance the attorney-client relationship. If you have any comments or suggestions that could improve this system, please feel free to contact the City Attorney.

I. BILLING FORMAT
Unless otherwise agreed, the following information must be provided in monthly bills:
a. A detailed description of work, in time increments of .1 hour (one tenth of an hour) for and by each and every individual billing services. b. Identification of the lawyer who is in charge of the matter. c. Reasonably detailed disbursement breakdowns with backup documentation of any individual charge exceeding $100.00.
d. Each billing item must be separately stated on a separate line identifying the individual performing the services, the time spent and the exact nature of the service rendered.
e. When charges are made for research time, the specific issue being researched and the need for the research should be identified.
f. Each item billed should be coded to a specific litigation budget line item, if applicable.
g. The City Attorney reserves the right to request various levels of detail and specific formats (such as columnar comparisons with established budgets).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 982 of 1760 ends

Exhibit B
11 II. BILLING GUIDELINES
a. All tasks set forth in Special Counsel’s billing documentation shall be specific and detailed. Overly generalized listings of task descriptions such as “review contract” or “prepare for negotiations” are not acceptable. b. Billings under this Agreement shall not be provided in more than six (6) minute increments and shall represent the devotion of a full six minutes before an increment is billed. Under no circumstances shall Special Counsel use “block billing” procedures, wherein a list or series of activities is done each day with only an aggregate amount of time specified.
c. Special Counsel shall keep the City advised of the identity and billing rates of those people working on the project account.
d. All time shall be billed within 30 days of the end of the month in which services were performed.
e. Counsel shall advise City whenever it anticipates the amount of services necessary to properly execute the task will exceed the amount of the contract.

When accrued billings are equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Payment Limit, written notice shall be given to the City as soon as possible, via e-mail, to the City Attorney’s Office, of this fact. In order to satisfy this notification requirement, Counsel shall monitor its accrued billings on a weekly basis and immediately notify the City Attorney if the eighty percent (80%) threshold is met. Special Counsel acknowledges the fiscal constraints on City funding and therefore Special Counsel assumes risk of non-payment for services rendered in the event the amount of services rendered exceeds the amount of the contract unless prior written authorization is received. Authorization to exceed the amount set forth in Exhibit A may be given only by City Attorney in writing. f. Only those attorneys approved by the City may bill on the case. g. Special Counsel shall not charge for more than one attorney at any hearing, deposition, or meeting of any kind without advance approval of the City Attorney.
h. No more than two paraprofessionals may bill on a particular case without the prior approval of the City.
i. The City has retained Special Counsel for its expertise, and therefore expects not to be billed for introductory or background research. City appreciates when Special Counsel has researched an issue previously and uses that research on present cases or projects. Do not charge the City for work Special Counsel has done and billed another client for in the past.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 983 of 1760 ends

Exhibit B
12 j. Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Agreement, Special Counsel shall provide any manuals or policies describing Special Counsel’s billing practices.
k. The City does not allow “double billing” of any sort. If Special Counsel is working on another client’s matter, do not bill City for that time. This applies to travel time or any other matter.
l. Training time is not billable. Law clerks may be used only with prior approval. m. City will not pay for new attorneys to “get up to speed” on a file unless it has been preapproved.
n. If a matter arises that requires Special Counsel to open a new file, the City Attorney should be informed immediately.
o. City reserves the right to require additional substantiation of any item of claimed expense.

III.REIMBURSEMENTS
a. The City will reimburse Special Counsel for the following expenses, and for no other expenses:
• Actual printing costs;
• Copying costs at $.12 / page (for legal documents and file materials, but not library materials);
• Actual cost of postage (including express mail delivery charges); • Facsimile charges at the rate of $0.25 per page;
• Computer research support services (e.g., Westlaw, LEXIS or computer time or services) at actual cost, but not to exceed 15% of the total fees for all legal services;
• Actual cost of long distance telephone calls;
• Transcription and reporter's fees; and
• Reasonable travel. The City does not pay for meals unless Attorney is required to be away from office for one full day. All meals and/or travel reimbursements will be subject to approval by the City Attorney. Travel expenses are limited to the lesser of actual expenses or expenses that would be authorized for City employee travel pursuant to City policy. b. The City Attorney must approve in advance any single reimbursement item in excess of $250.
c. Any expense other than those listed in section “a.” must be approved by the City Attorney in writing and in advance in an approved budget. d. No compensation shall be allowed for administrative overhead or premiums added to the direct cost of research support or other services.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 984 of 1760 ends

Exhibit B
13 e. Court filings shall be prepared in a timely manner so that “rush” or “expedited” messenger fees are not incurred.
f. Messenger and other charges in excess of actual costs are not permitted. City does not allow cost, plus a percentage, for actual outside costs g. City does not pay for secretarial time or secretarial overtime. City does not pay attorneys or paralegals for secretarial tasks or tasks that should not be included in Special Counsel’s overhead. For example, faxing, mailing, arranging for messengers and calendaring are not acceptable charges.
h. City does not pay for billing or discussions of bills, including discussions initiated by the City or City’s requests for additional information about a bill. i. The practice of minimum billing charges is prohibited. Please charge for actual time spent. For example, a minimum of .2 for phone calls or .4 for letters is unreasonable unless it is an accurate measure of time spent. j. Do not charge for file opening or file closing. These are not true legal services, tasks or adequate descriptions of legal activities.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 985 of 1760 ends

Exhibit C
14 SANCTUARY CITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
The undersigned, an authorized agent of Ellis Investigations, L.C. (hereafter "Contractor"), has had an opportunity to review the requirements of City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 (hereafter "Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance" or “SCCO”). Contractor understands and agrees that the City may choose with whom it will maintain business relations and may refrain from contracting with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor understands the meaning of the following terms used in the SCCO:
a. "Data Broker” means either of the following:
i. The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector business and government agencies;
ii. The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose from that for which it is ultimately used.
b. “Extreme Vetting” means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar services."
Contractor understands that it is not eligible to receive or retain a City contract if at the time the Contract is executed, or at any time during the term of the Contract, it provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE.

Contractor further understands and agrees that Contractor's failure to comply with the SCCO shall constitute a material default of the Contract and the City Manager may terminate the Contract and bar Contractor from bidding on future contracts with the City for five (5) years from the effective date of the contract termination.

By executing this Statement, Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of the SCCO and that if at any time during the term of the Contract it ceases to comply, Contractor will promptly notify the City Manager in writing.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this _______ day of _____________, 202__, at ____________________, California.

Printed Name: ___ Title:

Signed: Date:

Business Entity:

Vendor SCCO Compliance Statement (Augt2020)
Leslie D. Ellis Partner
11/8/21
Ellis Investigations Law Corporation
eighth November 1
Sacramento
DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 986 of 1760 ends

Exhibit D
15 City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:

Professional Services
In all instances where CONTRACTOR or its representatives will provide professional services (architects, engineers, construction management, counselors, medical professionals, hospitals, clinics, attorneys, consultants, accountants, etc.) to the City of Richmond (City), the City requires the following MINIMUM insurance requirements and limits.

CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract, agreement, or other order for work, services or supplies, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the contract. Failure to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of contract.

CONTRACTOR agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which it has agreed to provide Commercial General Liability insurance, CONTRACTOR shall look solely to its insurance for recovery.

CONTRACTOR hereby grants to CITY, on behalf of any insurer providing Commercial General Liability insurance to either CONTRACTOR or CITY with respect to the services of CONSULTANT herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said CONTRACTOR may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Original, signed certificates and original, separate policy endorsements, naming the City as an additional insured for general liability coverage, as well as a waiver of subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance, shall be received and approved by the City before any work may begin. However, failure to do so shall not operate as a waiver of these insurance requirements.

City reserves the right to modify or require additional coverages for specific risk exposures depending on scope of CONTRACTORS work.

Minimum coverage is detailed below. The policy limits of coverage shall be made available to the full limits of the policy. The minimum limits stated herein shall not serve to reduce the policy limits of coverage of CONTRACTOR.

Minimum Scope of Insurance – the following forms shall be provided and coverage shall be at least as broad as the following:

1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001), and including coverage for bodily and personal injury, property damage, and products and completed operations (if applicable).

2. Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability coverage (ISO Form CA 0001, Code 1, Any Auto).

3. Original and Separate Additional Insured Endorsement for General Liability (ISO Form CG 20 10 11/85 or its equivalent) with primary and non-contributory language.

4. Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California including Employer’s Liability coverage.

5. Original and Separate Waiver of Subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance.

6. Professional Liability or Errors & Omissions Liability Insurance appropriate to the CONTRACTOR’s profession (if required.)
Required Coverage Minimum Limits
Workers’ Compensation and
Employers’ Liability
Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1 million Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease. If CONTRACTOR is self-insured, provide a certificate of Permission to SelfInsure, signed by the California Department of Industrial Relations and SelfInsurance. If contractor is a sole proprietor (has no employees) than contractor must sign “Contractor Release of Liability” found at:
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

General Liability
(primary and excess limits
combined)
$2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If the policy includes a general aggregate, either the general aggregate shall apply separately to this project, service or location or the minimum required aggregate limit shall be twice the per occurrence limit ($4 million aggregate limit).

Policy shall be endorsed to name the City of Richmond as an additional insured per the conditions detailed below.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 987 of 1760 ends

Exhibit D
16 City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:

Professional Services
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.

Professional Liability or Errors &
Omissions Liability –
Required for all professionals
including architects, engineers,
consultants, construction
management, counselors, medical
professionals, hospitals, clinics,
attorneys and accountants, & other
consultants as may be required by
the City.

PROJECT COST
$0 - $1 million
$1 million - $5 million
Over $5 million

REQUIRED LIMIT
$1 million p/o
$2 million p/o
$5 million p/o
Required Policy Conditions
Additional Insured Endorsement Applicable to General Liability coverage.

The City of Richmond, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be named as additional insureds for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured including bodily injury, deaths and property damage or destruction arising in any respect directly or indirectly in the performance of this contract.

ISO form CG 20 10 (11/85) or its equivalent is required. If the Contractor is supplying their product or providing a service then the endorsement must not exclude products and completed operations coverage. If it does, then CG 20 37 (10/01) is also required.

SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

Primary and Noncontributory The contractor’s insurance coverage must be primary coverage as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by the City is wholly separate from the insurance of the contractor and in no way relieves the contractor from its responsibility to provide insurance.

Waiver of Subrogation
Endorsement Form
Contractor’s insurer will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for Workers’ Compensation Insurance during the life of this contract.

SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

Deductibles and Self-Insured
Retentions
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City or the CONTRACTOR shall procure a financial guarantee in an amount equal to the deductible or self-insured retention guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

Contractor is responsible for satisfaction of the deductible and/or self-insured retention for each loss.

A. M. Best Rating A:VII or Better. If the A.M. Best Rating falls below the required rating, CONTRACTOR must replace coverage immediately and provide notice to City.

Umbrella/Excess Liability Policies
If an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy is used to meet the liability limits, coverage shall be as broad as specified for underlying coverage’s and cover those insured in the underlying policies.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 988 of 1760 ends

Exhibit D
17 City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:

Professional Services
Claims-Made Policies
If any insurance policy is written on a claims-made form: 1) the retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 2) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 3) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claimsmade policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase an extended period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.

Subcontractors
CONTRACTOR shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish to the City for review and approval, separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify the City of Richmond for any damage resulting to it from failure of either CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor to take out or maintain the required insurance policies. The fact that insurance is obtained by CONTRACTOR, and/or CONTRACTOR’s subcontractors, will not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of CONTRACTOR, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this contract. Damages recoverable by CITY from CONTRACTOR or any third party will not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage.

Verification of Coverage
All original certificates and endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work may begin. The City of Richmond reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies including endorsements affecting the coverage at any time.

Original insurance certificates and required policy endorsements shall be mailed or delivered to the Designated Project Manager for the City of Richmond.

Insurance certificates and endorsements may be faxed to the Designated Project Manager. However, CONTRACTOR must mail the original certificates and endorsements to Designated Project Manager once faxed.

Continuous Coverage
CONTRACTOR shall maintain the required insurance for the life of the contract. Should the CONTRACTOR cease to have insurance as required during this time, all work by the CONTRACTOR pursuant to this agreement shall cease until insurance acceptable to the City is provided. In the event that CONTRACTOR fails to comply with the City’s insurance requirements, the City may take such action as it deems necessary to protect the City’s interests. Such action may include but is not limited to termination of the contract, withholding of payments, or other actions as the City deems appropriate.

If services or the scope of work extend beyond the expiration dates of the required insurance policies initially approved by the City, CONTRACTOR must provide updated certificates and endorsements indicating that the required coverage, terms and conditions are still in place.

Renewal certificates and updated endorsements shall be mailed to the Designated Project Manager.

Cancellation
CONTRACTOR shall ensure that coverage shall not be cancelled, reduced or otherwise materially changed except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice has been given to the City.

Reporting Requirements
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

Consistent with Public Policy
The insuring provisions, insofar as they may be judged to be against public policy shall be void and unenforceable only to the minimum extent necessary so that the remaining terms and provisions herein may be consistent with public policy and thus enforceable DocuSign Envelope ID: 44F57BF8-7561-4217-B936-4516C6AD5B90

Page 989 of 1760 ends
Page 990 of 1760 ends
Page 991 of 1760 ends
Page 992 of 1760 ends
Page 993 of 1760 ends

Second Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services
A-1

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES

BETWEEN

THE CITY OF RICHMOND
AND
ELLIS INVESTIGATIONS, L.C.

This Second Amendment to the Agreement for Legal Services between the City of Richmond (“City”) and ELLIS INVESTIGATIONS, L.C. (“Special Counsel”) (the "Second Amendment") is entered into as of APRIL 5, 2022, by and between the City and Special Counsel with reference to the following facts:

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and Special Counsel entered into that certain Legal Services Agreement (“Original Agreement”) to conduct confidential personnel investigations; and
WHEREAS, the City now desires for Special Counsel to continue conducting such investigations and to increase the compensation limit by Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000); and
WHEREAS, the City and Special Counsel desire to amend the Original Agreement pursuant to this Second Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals hereof, and other mutual covenants and promises contained herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the City and Special Counsel agree as follows:

1. Amendment. Exhibit A of the Original Agreement, “Scope of Work and Schedule of Fees & Charges,” is hereby amended to read as shown in Attachment 1 to this First Amendment.

2. Effect of Second Amendment. Except as provided in this Second Amendment, all other terms of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

3. Counterparts. This Second Amendment may be executed in counterparts each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
[Signatures on following page]

Page 994 of 1760 ends

Second Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services
A-2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Special Counsel have caused this Second Amendment to be effective as of the last date written below.

CITY OF RICHMOND ELLIS INVESTIGATIONS, L.C.
________________________ By __________________________
Mayor
Title _________________________
_________________________
Date
Date __________________________
Attest:

By: _____________________
City Clerk
Approved as to form:

By: _____________________
City Attorney

Page 995 of 1760 ends

Second Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services
A-3
Attachment 1

SCOPE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE OF FEES & CHARGES
Scope of work:

Special Counsel shall conduct confidential personnel investigations.

City of Richmond Contact Attorney: Shannon L. Moore, Sr. Assistant City Attorney Schedule of Fees & Charges:

Hourly Rates
LESLIE ELLIS $435/hour
OTHER ATTORNEY INVESTIGATORS $315-435/hour
LEGAL SUPPORT SPECIALIST $185/hour
Compensation:

Only those costs and expenses set forth in Section III of Exhibit "B", entitled "Reimbursements" shall be paid to Special Counsel.

Total compensation for legal services and reimbursements shall be charged in accordance with Exhibits "A" and "B" and shall not exceed the sum of One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000) for attorneys’ fees and reimbursements.

Page 996 of 1760 ends
Page 1 of 4 ends

May 17, 2022
Information Technology
DATE: May 17, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sue Hartman, Director of Information Technology,
Subject: Pole License Agreement for Small Cell Sites on City Infrastructure
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Pole License Agreement will generate an annual fee of $270 per pole used by AT&T. The fee will escalate
three percent (3%) annually. It is anticipated that AT&T will utilize approximately 100 City-owned poles over the next five years. The revenue received will be posted to account 01262117-364855.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

N/A

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The Information Technology Department is requesting
City Council approval of a Pole License Agreement with
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC that establishes the
procedures, terms, and conditions under which New
Cingular Wireless is permitted to deploy “small cell”
facilities on City-owned streetlights, traffic signals, and other vertical infrastructure.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution approving a Pole License Agreement with New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, that
establishes the procedures, terms, and conditions under which New Cingular Wireless is permitted to deploy
“small cell” facilities on City-owned streetlights, traffic signals, and other vertical infrastructure, for a term of ten years – Information Technology Department (Sue
Hartman 510-620-6874). This item was continued from
the May 3, 2022, meeting.

AGENDA
REPORT

Page 997 of 1760 ends
Page 2 of 4 ends

May 17, 2022
DISCUSSION:

Small Wireless Facilities
In general, small wireless facilities (or “small cells”) are low power wireless facilities that are used to enhance wireless network capacity. Unlike macro cell sites (i.e., traditional, large cell towers and rooftop installations) that provide broad wireless coverage, small cells are placed closer together and closer to the user. Given the abundance and location of streetlights, traffic signals, and utility poles, these structures have become the ideal support structures for wireless providers to deploy new small cells.

Dozens of small cells have already been deployed throughout the City and industry trends suggest that this will continue. As the owner of a substantial number of streetlights, wireless providers have requested the City’s permission to install small cells on City-owned poles. New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (d/b/a “AT&T”) is the most recent provider to request attachment rights to the City’s poles.

Accordingly, City staff recommends that the City adopt a Pole License Agreement (“PLA”) for facilities deployed on City-owned infrastructure to control the duration, terms, and scope of AT&’Ts use. The PLA would contain standardized terms and conditions for the attachment of facilities to City-owned poles. The PLA would not replace the permitting requirements in the City’s municipal code and policies related to the deployment of small wireless facilities and would be required as part of a complete application for such permits when an applicant seeks to use City-owned poles.

Federal Communications Commission Report and Order
On September 26, 2018, the Federal Communications Commission adopted a Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order in the Matter of Accelerating Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment (“FCC Order”). The FCC Order established a new classification for small wireless facilities that imposes substantial restrictions on state and local governments’ ability to regulate these facilities.

The FCC Order limits the extent to which local agencies may impose fees on small wireless facility deployments on City-owned infrastructure. Local fees must be a reasonable approximation of the local jurisdiction’s costs and no higher than the fees charged to similarly situated competitors in similar situations. The fee limits apply to the following:
 Processing small wireless facility applications;
 Use of the public right-of-way; and
 Attachment rights to structures in the public right-of-way that are owned or controlled by local governments.

Prior to the FCC Order, local jurisdictions were able to negotiate compensation with wireless providers for access to municipal-owned poles. After the FCC Order, local governments are required to offer cost-based access or $270 per pole per year. The

Page 998 of 1760 ends
Page 3 of 4 ends

May 17, 2022
City currently has one active agreement with ExteNet Systems that was entered into before the FCC Order was adopted.

Pole License Agreement (PLA) Terms
The PLA provides the terms and conditions by which wireless providers will be able to attach small cells on City-owned infrastructure. The PLA does not apply to any infrastructure that the City does not own (e.g., electric utility poles), but all small wireless facilities must obtain the applicable permits required under the Richmond Municipal Code and the City’s small wireless facility regulations.

Here is a summary of the key terms of the PLA:

1. License Area and Use. The PLA defines the area by which only a “small wireless facility” shall be installed, pursuant to the approved plans. This PLA does not limit the City’s right to use the subject pole for its own use and the Licensee shall not impede any municipal functions. The use of permitted area is limited to the construction, installation, operation, and maintenance of the small wireless facility.

2. Term. The initial term of the PLA would be for ten years from the effective date with an option to renew.

3. Fees. The annual license fee is $270.00 per pole per year, escalated three percent (3%) annually, for consistency with the presumptively reasonable license fees allowed under the FCC Order.

4. Construction, Installation, and Modification. The PLA requires the Licensee to seek any required regulatory approvals, including applicable City permits, prior to installing any equipment in the licensed area. The installation must also be in conformance with the approved plans and the Licensee is responsible for all direct and indirect costs in connection with designing, purchasing, and installing all equipment and securing any required approvals. This section also provides procedures to the extent that the Licensee seeks to change, install new, or modify any existing equipment within the licensed area.

5. Maintenance Obligations. The Licensee is required to maintain all of its equipment in good, safe, and orderly condition at all times, and shall promptly repair any damage to any of its equipment whenever repair or maintenance is required. The Licensee is also required at its sole cost and expense to repair damage or alterations caused either directly or indirectly by the Licensee or its agents.

6. Rearrangement and Relocation. In the event the City needs to perform work such as change the street grade, width, or location that impacts the small wireless facility, the City reserves the right to request a rearrangement or relocation of the equipment at Licensee’s expense. This section also covers issues that may arise when the City needs to accommodate third parties with rights to use space within the public rights-of-way.

7. Utilities. The Licensee would be required to secure its own utility services for the small wireless facility and any supporting equipment; however, the City shall make a good faith effort to ensure its utility infrastructure is available.

Page 999 of 1760 ends
Page 4 of 4 ends

May 17, 2022
FINANCIAL IMPACT:

In accordance with FCC regulations, the PLA will generate an annual fee of $270 per pole used by AT&T. The fee will escalate three percent (3%) annually. Carriers are expected to deploy dozens of sites within the City over the next five years. In addition, AT&T has agreed to reimburse the City for the City’s costs to prepare and negotiate the PLA. To maintain a fair and balanced competitive environment, the City would require such cost reimbursement from AT&T’s competitors or potential competitors that negotiate an agreement for the right to attach to City-owned poles.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2022-_____
Attachment 2 – Pole License Agreement
Attachment 3 – FCC Report and Order

Page 1000 of 1760 ends

page 1 / 5
RESOLUTION NO. 22-_____

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND APPROVING

A TEMPLATE POLE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS

PCS, LLC AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE POLE LICENSE

AGREEMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES IN

THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
WHEREAS, Section 253 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 preserves the City’s authority to control access to and use the rights-of-way within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries, and to require reasonable compensation for such use on a competitively-neutral and nondiscriminatory basis so long as such compensation is disclosed; and
WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code §§ 7901 and 7901.1 authorizes telephone corporations to construct “telephone lines along and upon any public road or highway” within the City and “erect poles, posts, piers, or abutments for supporting the insulators, wires, and other necessary fixtures of their lines, in such manner and at such points as not to incommode the public use of the road or highway” subject to the City’s reasonable time, place and manner control; and
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2018, the Federal Communications Commission released a Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order (FCC 18-133) in the rulemaking proceeding entitled Accelerating Wireless Broadband by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, WT Docket No. 17-79, which interpreted various provisions in the Telecommunications Act in a manner that, inter alia, limited the compensation that state and local governments may receive from wireless providers for access to government-owned infrastructure, including City-owned streetlights for the deployment of small wireless facilities;
WHEREAS, the City owns and controls infrastructure within the public right-ofway that are potentially suitable for installing small wireless facilities and wireless providers desire to install, maintain and operate such facilities on the City's infrastructure and are willing to compensate the City in conformance with applicable laws;
WHEREAS, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC is requesting that the City enter into a Pole License Agreement to attach small wireless facilities to attach to City-owned infrastructure;
WHEREAS, consistent with applicable laws, the City does not intend the Pole License Agreement to grant New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC or any particular wireless provider the exclusive right to use or occupy the public rights-of-way within the City’s territorial and/or jurisdictional boundaries, and the City may enter into similar or identical

Page 1001 of 1760 ends

page 2 / 5
agreements with other entities, which include without limitation to any business competitors of a wireless provider who has entered into a Pole License Agreement; WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, the City Council, after consideration of all pertinent documents and testimony, declared its intent to approve the template Pole License Agreement and delegate authority to the City Manager (or the City Manager’s designee) to enter into Pole License Agreements in a form materially similar to Exhibit A with authorized providers, including New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, subject to all the applicable permits issued by the City to protect public health, safety and welfare.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds that: (a) the facts set forth in the recitals in this Resolution are true and correct and incorporated by reference; (b) the recitals constitute findings in this matter and, together with the staff report, other written reports, public testimony and other information contained in the record, are an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the actions taken in this Resolution; (c) the provisions in this Resolution are consistent with the General Plan, Richmond Municipal Code and applicable federal and state law; and (d) this Resolution will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare.

Section 2. Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15378 and Public Resources Code Section 21065, the approval of a Pole License Agreement template does not constitute a “project” because there is no potential these activities will result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

Approval of the proposed Pole License Agreement template and the associated authorization for the City Manager to enter into individual agreements are organizational and/or administrative activities of the City that establish attachment rights, procedures and mechanisms for small cell deployments on City-owned infrastructure that may be proposed in the future. If such proposals are received, the City would conduct an appropriate environmental evaluation as may be required by law before any such proposals or associated permits would be approved.

Moreover, even if the adoption of the Pole License Agreement template is a project for CEQA purposes, it would qualify for the “commonsense” exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) or a Class 3 exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303. The “commonsense” exemption applies because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. Small wireless facilities on existing poles involve limited construction activities within streets, sidewalks and other rights-of-way previously developed with transportation, communications, utility or municipal infrastructure. Small wireless facilities are unattended facilities that would not cause any change in traffic patterns, population density or intensification of use at locations where the facilities are located. No unusual circumstances exist. The Class 3 exemption also applies because small wireless facilities on existing streetlights involve construction and location of

Page 1002 of 1760 ends

page 3 / 5
limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures and installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures including electrical, gas and other utility extensions. Accordingly, no further environmental review is required. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.

Section 3. The City Council hereby approves the template Pole License Agreement (attached as Exhibit A) for the installation, operation and maintenance of small wireless facilities by wireless providers, including New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, on certain City-owned infrastructure and authorizes the City Manager (or the City Manager’s designee), subject to the City Attorney’s prior review and approval, to execute Pole License Agreements in materially similar form, or with other changes that may be required by applicable laws, with such wireless providers.

Section 4. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or term (each a “Provision”) in this Resolution, or any Provision’s application to any person or circumstance, is held illegal, invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, all other Provisions not held illegal, invalid or unconstitutional, or such Provision’s application to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected. The City Council declares that it would have passed and adopted this Resolution, and each Provision therein, whether any one or more Provisions be declared illegal, invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption and shall remain effective until amended, superseded or repealed by a separate Resolution adopted by the City Council.

I certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Richmond City Council at a regular meeting held on , 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

_________________________________________
City Clerk
(SEAL)
Approved:
_______________________________________
Mayor

Page 1003 of 1760 ends

page 4 / 5
Approved as to form:
________________________________________
City Attorney

Page 1004 of 1760 ends

page 5 / 5

EXHIBIT A

POLE LICENSE AGREEMENT
(appears behind this coversheet)

Page 1005 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

POLE LICENSE AGREEMENT
between

CITY OF RICHMOND, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND CHARTER CITY
and

NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY

Page 1006 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA i
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

CONTENTS

1. DEFINITIONS........................................................................................................... 2

2. LICENSE AREA........................................................................................................ 5

2.1. License Area Defined......................................................................................... 5

2.2. Limited Rights Created....................................................................................... 6

2.3. No Impediment to Municipal Functions .............................................................. 6

2.4. License Area Condition ...................................................................................... 6

2.5. Licensee’s Due Diligence................................................................................... 7

2.6. Diminutions in Light, Air or Signal Transmission or Reception........................... 7

2.7. Certified Access Specialist Disclosure ............................................................... 7

3. USE OF LICENSE AREA ......................................................................................... 7

3.1. Permitted Use .................................................................................................... 7

3.2. Prohibition on Non-Small Wireless Facilities...................................................... 8

3.3. Prohibition on Nuisances ................................................................................... 8

3.4. Signs and Advertisements ................................................................................. 8

4. TERM ....................................................................................................................... 8

5. FEES ........................................................................................................................ 8

5.1. Annual License Fee/Regulatory Fees/Reimbursement Fees ............................. 8

5.2. Fee Adjustments by City .................................................................................... 9

5.3. Late Fees ........................................................................................................... 9

5.4. Default Interest................................................................................................... 9

5.5. City’s Right to Cost Reimbursement ................................................................ 10

5.6. City’s Right to Fair Market License Fees Reserved ......................................... 10

5.7. In Lieu Fee for Landscape Restoration and Maintenance................................ 11

6. CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND MODIFICATIONS.................................. 11

6.1. Regulatory Approvals....................................................................................... 11

6.2. Compliance with Approved Plans..................................................................... 11

6.3. Changes or Corrections to Approved Plans ..................................................... 12

6.4. Licensee’s Contractors and Subcontractors..................................................... 12

6.5. Labor and Materials ......................................................................................... 12

6.6. Damage or Alterations to Other Property ......................................................... 12

6.7. Underground Service Alert............................................................................... 13

6.8. Damage and Repair to Subsurface Structures................................................. 13

6.9. Equipment Modifications .................................................................................. 13

Page 1007 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA ii
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

6.10. Post-Completion Inspections ........................................................................ 14

6.11. As-Built Plans and Maps............................................................................... 14

6.12. Title to Licensee’s Equipment and Other Improvements............................... 15

7. LICENSEE’S MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS....................................................... 15

7.1. General Maintenance and Repair Requirements ............................................. 15

7.2. Damage Reports to the City............................................................................. 16

7.3. Licensee’s Obligation to Make Repairs ............................................................ 16

7.4. Graffiti Abatement ............................................................................................ 17

8. REARRANGEMENT AND RELOCATION .............................................................. 17

8.1. Rearrangement and Relocation for City Work.................................................. 17

8.2. Rearrangement and Relocation to Accommodate Third Parties ...................... 18

8.3. No Right to Rearrange or Relocate City Property ............................................ 18

9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS................................................................................... 18

9.1. Compliance with CPUC General Orders .......................................................... 18

9.2. Compliance with Building and Electrical Codes ............................................... 19

9.3. Compliance with FCC RF Exposure Standards ............................................... 19

9.4. Compliance with Prevailing Wage Regulations................................................ 19

10. PUBLIC WORKS’ OPERATIONS........................................................................ 20

10.1. City Access to License Area ......................................................................... 20

10.2. City’s Maintenance, Repairs or Alterations to License Area ......................... 20

10.3. Notice to Licensee for Non-Emergency Maintenance or Repairs ................. 21

10.4. Emergencies................................................................................................. 21

11. INTERFERENCE ................................................................................................ 21

12. LIENS.................................................................................................................. 22

13. UTILITIES............................................................................................................ 22

14. TAXES AND OTHER ASSESSMENTS............................................................... 23

15. INDEMNIFICATION............................................................................................. 23

15.1. Licensee’s Indemnification Obligations ......................................................... 23

15.2. Licensee’s Defense of the City ..................................................................... 24

16. INSURANCE ....................................................................................................... 24

17. LIMITATIONS ON THE CITY’S LIABILITY.......................................................... 24

17.1. General Limitations....................................................................................... 25

17.2. Consequential, Indirect or Punitive Damages ............................................... 25

17.3. No Relocation Assistance ............................................................................. 25

Page 1008 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA iii
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

17.4. No Personal Liability for City Personnel........................................................ 26

18. CASUALTY ......................................................................................................... 26

18.1. City’s Rights Upon a Casualty Event ............................................................ 26

18.2. Licensee’s Termination Rights Upon a Casualty Event ................................ 26

18.3. Statutory Waiver ........................................................................................... 27

18.4 Insurance Proceeds ...................................................................................... 27

19. CONDEMNATION............................................................................................... 27

20. ASSIGNMENTS AND OTHER TRANSFERS...................................................... 27

20.1. General Restriction ....................................................................................... 27

20.2. Permitted Assignments ................................................................................. 28

20.3. Effect of Assignment..................................................................................... 28

21. DEFAULT............................................................................................................ 29

21.1. Defaults and Cure Periods............................................................................ 29

21.2. Licensee’s Remedies.................................................................................... 29

21.3. City’s Remedies............................................................................................ 29

21.3.1. License Continuation.............................................................................. 29

21.3.2. License Termination............................................................................... 29

21.3.3. Default Fees........................................................................................... 30

21.4. Cumulative Remedies................................................................................... 30

22. TERMINATION.................................................................................................... 30

23. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS................................................................................. 31

23.1. Limitations on Hazardous Materials Use....................................................... 31

23.2. Notice to the City After a Release................................................................. 31

23.3. Licensee’s Hazardous Material Indemnification Obligations ......................... 31

24. RULES AND REGULATIONS ............................................................................. 32

25. PERFORMANCE BOND ..................................................................................... 32

26. SURRENDER OF LICENSE AREA..................................................................... 33

27. INSPECTIONS AND REPORTS ......................................................................... 33

27.1. License Area Inspections.............................................................................. 33

27.2. Records Maintenance and Audits ................................................................. 34

27.3. Annual Licensee Build-Plan Forecasts ......................................................... 34

28.1. Notices.......................................................................................................... 35

28.2. Waivers......................................................................................................... 36

28.3. Integration; Amendments.............................................................................. 36

Page 1009 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA iv
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

28.4. Interpretation................................................................................................. 36

28.4.1. General .................................................................................................. 37

28.4.2. Joint and Several Liability....................................................................... 37

28.4.3. Captions and Other Reference Material ................................................. 37

28.4.4. Time ....................................................................................................... 37

28.4.5. Inclusive Words and/or Phrases............................................................. 37

28.5. Successors and Assigns............................................................................... 38

28.6. Brokers ......................................................................................................... 38

28.7. Governing Law; Venue ................................................................................. 38

28.8. Litigation Fees and Costs ............................................................................. 38

28.9. Recording ..................................................................................................... 38

28.10. No Third-Party Beneficiaries...................................................................... 39

28.11. Survival...................................................................................................... 39

28.12. Severability ................................................................................................ 39 SCHEDULE 1................................................................................................................ 41 SCHEDULE 2................................................................................................................ 42 EXHIBIT A-1.................................................................................................................. 43 EXHIBIT A-2.................................................................................................................. 44 EXHIBIT B..................................................................................................................... 45 EXHIBIT C..................................................................................................................... 50

Page 1010 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 1
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

POLE LICENSE AGREEMENT
This POLE LICENSE AGREEMENT (“License”) dated ____________________ (the “Effective Date”) is between the CITY OF RICHMOND, a chartered California municipal corporation (the “City”) and NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Licensee”).

BACKGROUND
A. Section 253 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56, codified as 47 U.S.C. § 253, preserves the City’s authority to control access to and use of the rights-of-way within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries, and to require reasonable compensation for such use on a competitively-neutral and nondiscriminatory basis so long as such compensation is disclosed; and B. California Public Utilities Code §§ 7901 and 7901.1 authorizes telephone corporations to construct “telephone lines along and upon any public road or highway” within the City and “erect poles, posts, piers, or abutments for supporting the insulators, wires, and other necessary fixtures of their lines, in such manner and at such points as not to incommode the public use of the road or highway” subject to the City’s reasonable time, place and manner control; and C. On September 27, 2018, the Federal Communications Commission adopted a Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order (FCC 18-133) in the rulemaking proceeding entitled Accelerating Wireless Broadband by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, WT Docket No. 17-79 (the “Order”), which interpreted various provisions in the Telecommunications Act in a manner that, inter alia: (1) limited the compensation that state and local governments may receive from wireless communication and infrastructure providers for access to their public rightsof-way and government-owned infrastructure; (2) significantly curtailed state and local discretionary authority over wireless facility placement and design; and (3) imposed procedural regulations that require state and local governments to negotiate agreements such as this License and approve or deny associated permit applications within sixty (60) or ninety (90) days; and D. Licensee installs and maintains wireless communications facilities on existing vertical infrastructure in the public right-of-way; and E. Licensee warrants and represents to the City that Licensee has the authority under applicable Laws to install and maintain telephone lines within the State of California, which include wireless communications facilities, in the public right-of-way to provide wireless communications services; and

Page 1011 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 2
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
F. The City owns as its personal property a substantial number of existing poles within the public right-of-way that are potentially suitable for installing wireless communications facilities within the City’s jurisdiction and has a duty to derive appropriate value from the City’s property assets for the public good; and G. Licensee desires to install, maintain and operate wireless communications facilities on the City’s poles in the public right-of-way in a manner consistent with the City’s regulatory authority and Licensee is willing to compensate the City for the right to use the City’s poles for wireless communications purposes; and H. Consistent with California state law, the City intends this License to be applicable only to a City-owned pole, and does not intend this License to require any consideration as a precondition for any telephone corporation’s access to the public rights-of-way permitted under California Public Utilities Code § 7901; and I. The City desires to authorize Licensee’s access to an individual City-owned pole, or a batch of up to five individual pole(s)based on the terms and conditions set forth in this License, and pursuant to all the applicable permits issued by the City to protect public health and safety; and
J. Consistent with federal and California state law, the City does not intend this License to grant Licensee any exclusive right to use or occupy the public rights-of-way within the City’s territorial and/or jurisdictional boundaries, and Licensee expressly acknowledges that the City may in its sole discretion enter into similar or identical agreements with other entities, which include without limitation Licensee’s competitors; and
K. On [date], the City Council of the City of Richmond adopted Resolution No. [number], which approved the form and material terms for this License to be used in connection with the licensing of Vertical Infrastructure for wireless facilities, and further delegated authority to the City Manager to enter into such agreements.

NOW THEREFORE, for good, valuable and sufficient consideration received and acknowledged by the City and Licensee, the City and Licensee agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. DEFINITIONS
“Agent” means a party’s agent, employee, director, officer, contractor, subcontractor or representative in relation to this License.
“Approved Plans” means the detailed plans and equipment specifications, which include without limitation all equipment, mounts, hardware, utilities, cables, conduits, signage, concealment elements and other improvements proposed by Licensee and approved by the City for Licensee’s construction and/or installation work in connection with the License

Page 1012 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 3
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
Area, as more particularly described in Exhibit A-2 (Approved Plans) attached hereto and incorporated herein.
“Broker” means any licensed real estate broker or other person who could claim a right to a commission or “finder’s fee” in connection with the license(s) or other real estate rights contemplated or conveyed in this License.
“City Attorney” means the City Attorney of the City of Richmond, California. “City Property” means any interest in real or personal property owned or controlled by the City, which includes without limitation any and all (1) land, air and water areas; (2) license interests, leasehold interests, possessory interests, easements, franchises and other appurtenant rights or interests; (3) public rights-of-way or public utility easements; and (4) physical improvements such as buildings, structures, infrastructure, utility and other facilities, and alterations, installations, fixtures, furnishings and additions to existing real property, personal property and improvements.
“Claim” means any and all liabilities, losses, costs, claims, judgments, settlements, damages, liens, fines, penalties and expenses, whether direct or indirect. “CPUC” means the California Public Utilities Commission established in the California Constitution, Article XII, § 5, or the CPUC’s duly appointed successor agency. “Environmental Laws” means any Law in relation or connection to industrial hygiene, environmental conditions or Hazardous Materials (as defined in this License). “Equipment” means antennas, radios and any associated utility or equipment box, and battery backup, transmitters, receivers, amplifiers, ancillary fiber-optic cables and/or wiring, and ancillary equipment used for radio communication (voice, data or otherwise) transmission and/or reception, which includes without limitation the means, devices and apparatus used to attach any Equipment to any licensed Vertical Infrastructure, and any ancillary equipment such as wiring, cabling, power feeds or any similar things, and any signage attached to such Equipment that may be approved by the City or required by Law.
“FCC” means the Federal Communications Commission or its duly appointed successor agency.
“Hazardous Material” means any material that, due to its quantity, concentration or physical or chemical characteristics, is at any time now or hereafter deemed by any local, regional, state or federal body with jurisdiction and responsibility for issuing Regulatory Approvals in accordance with applicable Laws to pose a present or potential hazard to human health, welfare or safety, or to the environment. The term “Hazardous Material” as used in this License will be broadly construed, and includes, without limitation, the following: (1) any material or substance defined as a “hazardous substance”, or “pollutant” or “contaminant” in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and

Page 1013 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 4
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
Liability Act of 1980 (codified as 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq.) or California Health & Safety Code § 25316; (2) any “hazardous waste” listed California Health & Safety Code § 25140; or (3) any petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof, natural gas or natural gas liquids.
“Indemnified City Party” or “Indemnified City Parties” means the City and its Agents, Invitees, elected and appointed officials and volunteers. “Investigate and Remediate” means the undertaking of any activities to determine the nature and extent of Hazardous Material that may be located in, on, under or about the License Area or that has been, is being, or is in danger of being Released into the environment, and to clean up, remove, contain, treat, stabilize, monitor or otherwise control such Hazardous Material.
“Invitee” means the client, customer, invited guest, tenant, subtenant, licensee, assignee and/or sublicensee of a party in relation to the License Area. “Laws” means all present and future statutes, ordinances, codes, orders, policies, regulations and implementing requirements and restrictions by federal, state, county and/or municipal authorities, whether foreseen or unforeseen, ordinary as well as extraordinary, as adopted or as amended at the time in question. “License Area” means the same as that term is defined in Section 2.1 (License Area Defined).

License Fee” means the annual fee for each licensed Vertical Infrastructure authorized under this License, as specified in Schedule 1 (Annual License Fee) which shall be reasonably approximate to the City’s objectively reasonable costs consistent with applicable Laws.
“Licensee’s Office” means Licensee’s place(s) of business located at 5001 Executive Parkway, San Ramon, CA 94583 that contains all the records, in physical and/or electronic form, that Licensee is required to maintain under Section 27. “Licensee’s On-Call Representative” means the person(s) assigned by Licensee to be on-call and available to the City regarding the operation of Licensee’s Equipment. Such person(s) shall be qualified and experienced in the operation of Equipment and shall be authorized to act on behalf of Licensee in any emergency in and in day-to-day operations of the Equipment.
“NESC” means the National Electrical Safety Code, as may be amended or superseded, published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

Page 1014 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 5
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
“Preliminary Plans” mean the detailed plans and equipment specifications, which include without limitation all equipment, mounts, hardware, utilities, cables, conduits, signage, concealment elements and other improvements proposed by Licensee but not yet approved by the City in connection with the License Area. “Regulatory Approvals” means all licenses, permits and other approvals necessary for Licensee to install, operate and maintain Equipment on the License Area. “Regulatory Fees” means fees associated with permit applications, permit issuance fees, inspection fees, fines, penalties or other fees charged by the City in connection with the Equipment and/or any related Regulatory Approvals. All Regulatory Fees shall be reasonably approximate to the City’s objectively reasonable costs consistent with applicable Laws.
“Reimbursement Fees” means other fees for which the City has the right to receive reimbursement from Licensee under Applicable Laws. All Reimbursement Fees shall be reasonably approximate to the City’s objectively reasonable costs consistent with applicable Laws.
“Release” when used with respect to Hazardous Material includes any actual or imminent spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping or disposing on, under or about the License Area, other City Property or the environment.
“RF” means radio frequency or electromagnetic waves.
“Streets” mean any public right-of-way, street, alley, highway, sidewalk, curb, gutter, driveway, parkway or other public place primarily used or dedicated for vehicular transportation within the City’s territorial and/or jurisdictional boundaries and subject to the City’s management regulations. The term “Streets” does not encompass any private property, private utility easements, any public easements for pedestrian ingress and egress across private property or any other public easement not dedicated for use as a public road or highway.
“Vertical Infrastructure” means that certain pole or similar structure, subject to this License, owned or controlled by the City and located in the public rights-of-way or public utility easements and meant for, or used in whole or in part for, communications service, electric service, lighting, traffic control or similar functions.

2. LICENSE AREA

2.1. License Area Defined
The parties to this License define “License Area” to mean that certain space on that certain Vertical Infrastructure and other City Property, which includes without limitation

Page 1015 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 6
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
any conduits, chases, risers, trays, pipes, vaults, pull boxes, and hand holes, identified on the Approved Plans as occupied by the Equipment and licensed to Licensee, all as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit A-1 (License Area). The parties may batch up to five (5) Vertical Infrastructure in this License and each License Area shall be more particularly described and depicted in additional exhibits that comply with all the requirements of Exhibit A-1 and Exhibit A-2, provided, however that when batching of Vertical Infrastructure may occur under this License, Licensee’s use of each Vertical Infrastructure shall be deemed to be a separate and distinct stand-alone license notwithstanding that the Vertical Structure may have been batched in one application and confirmed in additional exhibits to this License. As an illustration, and not as a limitation, a default declared by the City under this License pursuant to Section 21.1 below with respect to a Vertical Infrastructure shall be a default of that Vertical Infrastructure only, and such default shall not apply to any other Vertical Infrastructure identified in this License. The License Area shall be for Licensee’s exclusive use subject to the terms and conditions of this License including the City’s paramount rights which will be superior to Licensee’s rights at all times as set forth in Section 2.2. below.

2.2. Limited Rights Created
This License grants Licensee only a non-possessory license to enter on to and use the License Area for the Permitted Use. The license shall be revocable in accordance with the terms and conditions of this License. Licensee expressly acknowledges and agrees that: (1) this License is not and shall not be deemed to be coupled with an interest; (2) the City retains legal possession and control over the Vertical Infrastructure for the City’s municipal functions, which will be superior to Licensee’s rights and interest in the Vertical Infrastructure, if any, at all times; (3) subject to the terms and conditions in this License, the City may terminate this License in whole or in part at any time; (4) except as specifically provided otherwise in this License, the City may enter into any agreement with third parties to use and/or occupy the Vertical Infrastructure and/or other City Property; and (5) this License does not create and will not be deemed to create any partnership or joint venture between the City and Licensee.

2.3. No Impediment to Municipal Functions
Except as expressly provided otherwise in this License, this License shall not limit, alter or waive the City’s absolute right to use the License Area, in whole or in part, as infrastructure established and maintained for the City’s and the public’s benefit.

2.4. License Area Condition
Licensee expressly acknowledges and agrees to enter on to and use the License Area in its “as-is and with all faults” condition. The City makes no representations or warranties whatsoever, whether express or implied, as to the License Area’s condition or suitability for Licensee’s use. Licensee expressly acknowledges and agrees that neither the City nor its Agents have made, and the City expressly disclaims, any representations or warranties whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to the License Area’s

Page 1016 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 7
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
physical, structural or environmental condition, the License Area’s present or future suitability for the Permitted Use or any other matter related to the License Area. This License shall not be deemed a warranty of title by the City.

2.5. Licensee’s Due Diligence
Licensee expressly represents and warrants to the City that Licensee has conducted a reasonably diligent and independent investigation, either for itself or through an Agent selected by Licensee, into the License Area’s condition and suitability for Licensee’s intended use, and that Licensee relies solely on its due diligence for such determination.

Licensee further expressly represents and warrants to the City that Licensee’s intended use is the Permitted Use as defined in this License. Any testing performed by Licensee or its Agents shall be subject to the provisions in Section 6.6 (Damage or Alterations to Other Property). In addition to any other conditions that the City may impose on such testing, Licensee shall have the obligation to repair any damage caused by such testing and to restore all affected areas to the condition that existed immediately prior to such testing.

2.6. Diminutions in Light, Air or Signal Transmission or Reception In the event that any existing or future structure diminishes any light, air or signal propagation, transmission or reception, whether erected by the City or not, Licensee shall not be entitled to any reduction in any License Fee, Regulatory Fees, Reimbursement Fees or any other sums payable to the City under this License, the City shall have no liability to Licensee whatsoever and such diminution will not affect this License or Licensee’s obligations except as may be expressly provided in this License.

2.7. Certified Access Specialist Disclosure
Pursuant to California Civil Code § 1938, as may be amended or superseded, and to the extent applicable to this License, the City expressly advises Licensee, and Licensee expressly acknowledges, that a Certified Access Specialist (as defined in California Civil Code § 55.53) has not inspected any License Area in whole or in part to determine whether it meets all applicable construction-related accessibility requirements.

3. USE OF LICENSE AREA

3.1. Permitted Use
Licensee may use the License Area solely to construct, install, operate and maintain Equipment for transmission and reception of wireless communications signals (the “Permitted Use”) in compliance with all applicable Laws, which includes without limitation the Richmond Municipal Code and any conditions in any Regulatory Approvals and for no other use whatsoever without the City’s prior written consent, which the City may withhold in its sole and absolute discretion for any or no reason.

Page 1017 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 8
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

3.2. Prohibition on Non-Small Wireless Facilities
The City intends this License to cover only wireless facilities that (a) qualify as a “small wireless facility” as that term is defined by the FCC under 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(l); and (b) have been approved by the City in accordance with all applicable provisions in the Richmond Municipal Code. Licensee expressly acknowledges and agrees that the Permitted Use under this License does not include the right to use any Vertical Infrastructure as a support structure for a “macro cell” or a traditional wireless tower or base station.

3.3. Prohibition on Nuisances
Licensee shall not use the License Area in whole or in part in any unlawful manner or for any illegal purpose. In addition, Licensee shall not use the License Area in whole or in part in any manner that constitutes a nuisance as determined by the City in its reasonable discretion. Licensee shall take all precautions to eliminate any nuisances or hazards in connection with its uses and activities on or about the License Area.

3.4. Signs and Advertisements
Licensee acknowledges and agrees that this License does not authorize Licensee to erect, post or maintain, or permit others to erect, post or maintain, any signs, notices, graphics or advertisements whatsoever on the License Area, except as may be specifically authorized under this License or as may be required for compliance with any Regulatory Approvals and applicable Laws.

4. TERM
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with this License or as may be permitted under applicable Laws, the initial term under this License shall commence on the Effective Date and expire ten (10) years from the Effective Date (the “Initial Term”). Following the expiration of the Initial Term, this License shall automatically renew for two (2) subsequent terms of five (5) years each (each a “Renewal Term”) unless either party provides the other party with at least one hundred eighty (180) days’ written notice prior to the expiration of the then-current term of their intent not to renew. Licensee may apply for a new license within no later than thirty (30) days before this License term expires, or at any time after this License’s expiration or termination.

5. FEES

5.1. Annual License Fee/Regulatory Fees/Reimbursement Fees Licensee shall pay the first annual License Fee within thirty (30) days from the Effective Date without any prior demand, deduction, setoff or counterclaim for any reason.

Thereafter, Licensee shall pay the City the License Fee on the anniversary of the Effective Date throughout the Term without any prior demand, deduction, setoff or counterclaim for

Page 1018 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 9
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
any reason, other than as provided in Section 5.3 below for late fees. Schedule 1 attached to this License and incorporated by this reference specifies the License Fee payable by Licensee to the City in each year throughout the Term. Unless otherwise adjusted in accordance with this License, the License Fee shall automatically increase by three percent (3%) each year on the anniversary of the Effective Date. In addition to the License Fee, Licensee shall pay application and permit fees which comprise a part of Regulatory Fees at the time of Licensee’s filing of the application or permit, as the case may be. Other Regulatory Fees not due at the time of Licensee’s filing of the application or permit, as the case may be, shall be paid as otherwise specified under applicable Laws or the City’s usual course of business that does not conflict with applicable Laws.

5.2. Fee Adjustments by City
At any time throughout the Term, the City shall have the option (but not the obligation) to adjust any License Fee, Regulatory Fees and Reimbursement Fees to reflect the reasonable approximation of the City’s objectively reasonable costs consistent with applicable Laws that are incurred in connection with this License, any Regulatory Approvals issued or administered by the City in connection with this License or the Equipment or Licensee’s acts or omissions on or about the License Area and/or the Streets. The City may exercise such option either by a resolution approved and adopted by the City Council (a “Fee Resolution”) or by written notice to Licensee (the “Adjustment Notice”). If the adjustment concerns the annual License Fee, the City shall have the right to substitute a new Schedule 1 to reflect such adjustment in either a Fee Resolution or an Adjustment Notice. Any adjustment by Fee Resolution shall be effective at the same time such Fee Resolution becomes effective. Any adjustment by Adjustment Notice shall be immediately effective. Licensee shall have the right to appeal any Adjustment Notice to the City Council in the manner prescribed by the Richmond Municipal Code.

5.3. Late Fees
In the event that Licensee fails to pay any License Fee or any other amount payable to the City within 10 days after the City notifies that such amounts are due and unpaid, such amounts will be subject to a late charge equal to six percent (6%) of unpaid amounts.

5.4. Default Interest
Any License Fee, Regulatory Fees, Reimbursement Fees and all other amounts payable to the City other than late charges will bear simple interest at ten percent (10%) per annum or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is less, from the due date when not paid within ten (10) days after due and payable to the City. Any sums received shall be first applied towards any interest, then to the late charge and lastly to the principal amount owed. Any interest or late charge payments will not alone excuse or cure any default by Licensee.

Page 1019 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 10
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

5.5. City’s Right to Cost Reimbursement
Notwithstanding anything in this License to the contrary, the City shall be entitled to recover from Licensee a reasonable approximation of the City’s costs consistent with applicable Laws where the costs themselves are reasonable and are non-discriminatory to furnish, provide and/or perform any services in connection with this License and any Regulatory Approvals issued or administered by the City, which includes without limitation any such costs incurred by City staff or the City’s contractors, consultants and experts to review permit applications, issue permits or supervise or inspect any construction, installation or other work in connection with this License. Payments by Licensee for any License Fee, Regulatory Fees, and Reimbursement Fees in connection with this License or any related Regulatory Approvals issued or administered by the City shall not relieve Permittee’s obligation to reimburse the City for any and all actual, reasonable and documented costs incurred by the City in the future consistent with applicable Laws.

Licensee shall reimburse the City for all such costs within thirty (30) days after Licensee’s receipt of a written demand from the City for reimbursement and reasonable documentation to support such costs. The provisions in this Section 5.5 shall survive the expiration, revocation or termination of this License.

5.6. City’s Right to Fair Market License Fees Reserved
Licensee acknowledges that: (a) the City is compelled by applicable Laws, which includes without limitation the Order, to accept certain reasonable and actual cost-based rates and compensation; (b) but for such Laws, the City would be entitled to condition its assent to any lease, license or other agreement for attachments to its Vertical Infrastructure (such as this License) on consideration that exceed the City’s reasonable and actual costs; and (c) but for such Laws, the City would not assent to all the terms and conditions in this License. Licensee further acknowledges that, in the event that a repeal or invalidation of the Order or other such laws described in this Section 5.6 is final and unappealable, the then-current License Fee shown in Schedule 1 and the License Fee in all remaining years on the Term shall be replaced by the amount(s) shown in Schedule 2 (City’s Estimated Fair Market License Fees), attached hereto and incorporated herein upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Licensee, provided; however, that the replacement fee shall be prorated for the remainder of the first year in which the then current License Fee is replaced. “Final and unappealable” as used in this Section 5.6 means: (1) all appeal rights by the FCC or its supporting intervenors have elapsed or been exhausted after a judicial order finding the limitations on the License Fee invalid for any reason, regardless of whether such order includes a remand to the agency for further proceedings; or (2) Congress has legislatively repealed or otherwise invalidated the limitations on the License Fee. As an illustration, and not as a limitation, if the License Fee commenced in 2021 and there was a final and unappealable invalidation of the Order or Congress has legislatively repealed or otherwise invalidated the limitations on the License Fee in 2023, then the License Fee in 2023 would increase from $286.44 to $1,591.35 with proration of the replacement fee for the remainder of 2023, the License Fee in 2024 would be $1,639.09 and so on until the License expires in 2041 or was earlier terminated in accordance with its terms.

Page 1020 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 11
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

5.7. In Lieu Fee for Landscape Restoration and Maintenance If the installation, construction or other work on or about the License Area damages or destroys any landscape features that would require the Licensee to repair, replace and/or maintain any existing or new landscape features pursuant to the Richmond Municipal Code or other applicable City policies, the City may (but shall not be obligated to) enter into a written agreement with the Licensee to accept an in-lieu fee for the actual cost to repair, replace and/or maintain the existing and/or new landscape features on the Licensee’s behalf. Such in-lieu fee(s) shall be established by the City in consultation with the Licensee and shall be reasonably related to the actual cost of any such repair, replacement and/or maintenance necessitated by the damage or destruction caused by Licensee’s installation, construction or other work.

6. CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND MODIFICATIONS

6.1. Regulatory Approvals
Licensee shall not commence any installation, construction and other work on or about the License Area until and unless Licensee first obtains all necessary prior Regulatory Approvals, which includes without limitation any approvals required to provide the services offered by Licensee either to the public or Licensee’s customers within the geographic area that encompasses the City’s territorial and/or jurisdictional boundaries, and any required use permits, design review permits, encroachment permits, building permits, grading permits and electrical permits. Any installation, construction or other work performed by Licensee or its Agents or Invitees without such Regulatory Approvals will be a default under this License in addition to any other liabilities or penalties the City, in its regulatory capacity, may impose on Licensee for the same acts or omissions.

6.2. Compliance with Approved Plans
Upon the City’s approval of all permits required to commence construction for Licensee’s construction and/or installation work on the License Area, the Approved Plans shall be substituted for the Preliminary Plans. Licensee shall perform all installation, construction and other work in connection with the License Area (1) in accordance with the terms and conditions in this License; (2) at Licensee’s sole cost and expense, and at no cost to the City; (3) in strict compliance with the Approved Plans; (4) in compliance with all applicable Laws, which includes without limitation all applicable provisions in the Richmond Municipal Code and any conditions in any applicable Regulatory Approvals; (5) in a safe, diligent, skillful and workmanlike manner; and (6) to the City’s satisfaction limited to the enumerated factors within this Section 6.2. After any work at the License Area concludes, Licensee shall restore the License Area and any other City Property to the condition that existed immediately prior to the work commenced, normal wear and tear excepted.

Page 1021 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 12
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

6.3. Changes or Corrections to Approved Plans
At all times relevant to this License, Licensee shall have the obligation to correct any errors or omissions in the Preliminary Plans (or, once approved, the Approved Plans) and related Regulatory Approval(s). Licensee shall immediately send written notice to the City in the event that Licensee discovers any such defects. The Approved Plans and/or amendments to Approved Plans by the City will not release or excuse Licensee’s obligations under this Section 6.3.

6.4. Licensee’s Contractors and Subcontractors
Licensee shall use only qualified and trained persons and appropriately licensed contractors for all installation, construction or other work performed on or about the License Area. At least five (5) business days before any installation, construction or other work commences on or about the License Area, Licensee shall provide the City with: (a) a schedule with all activities to be performed in connection with the installation, construction or other work; and (b) a list with all the names, contractors’ license numbers and contact information for all contractors or subcontractors who will perform the installation, construction or other work on the License Area.

6.5. Labor and Materials
Licensee shall be responsible for all direct and indirect costs (labor, materials and overhead) in connection with designing, purchasing and installing all Equipment in accordance with the Approved Plans and all applicable Laws. Licensee shall also bear all costs to obtain and maintain all Regulatory Approvals required in connection with the installation, which includes without limitation all direct and indirect costs to comply with any approval conditions or mitigation measures that arise from Licensee’s proposed installation. Licensee shall timely pay for all labor, materials, Equipment and all professional services related to the Permitted Use or furnished to the License Area at Licensee’s direction or for Licensee’s benefit. Licensee shall keep the License Area and all other City Property free from any and all mechanics’, materialmen’s and other liens and claims arising out of any work performed, materials furnished or obligations incurred by or for Licensee.

6.6. Damage or Alterations to Other Property
Nothing in this License authorizes Licensee to use, occupy, remove, damage or in any manner alter any private personal or real property, wherever located, owned by the City or any third parties. Licensee shall not remove, damage or in any manner alter any private personal or real property, wherever located, owned by the City or any third parties without prior written consent from property owner. The City may withhold and/or condition its consent to any request to alter any City Property in its sole and absolute discretion.

Page 1022 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 13
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

6.7. Underground Service Alert
Licensee warrants and represents to City that Licensee is presently a member in good standing with the Underground Service Alert of Northern California and Nevada (“USA North 811”). Licensee shall maintain and keep current its membership in USA North 811 throughout the Term. Prior to any excavation performed in the Streets, Licensee shall observe and perform all notice and other obligations required under applicable Laws, which includes, without limitation, California Government Code §§ 4216 et seq., as may be amended or superseded.

6.8. Damage and Repair to Subsurface Structures
Any excavation performed in the Streets must be monitored by Licensee for any lateral movement, trench failures and other similar hazards. Licensee shall, at Licensee’s sole cost and expense, repair any damage (which includes without limitation any subsidence, cracking, erosion, collapse, weakening and/or any loss or reduction in lateral or subjacent support) to the Streets, any adjacent private property, any utility lines or systems (whether overhead or underground) and any sewer and/or water lines or systems resulting from or in connection with any excavation by Licensee or its Agents. All repair or restoration work, normal wear and tear excepted, performed pursuant to this Section 6.8 shall be performed under the City’s supervision and to the City’s satisfaction.

6.9. Equipment Modifications
If, after the initial construction, installation or other work is completed, Licensee proposes to modify existing Equipment or install new equipment on the existing License Area, then the following process and standards shall apply.
(a) Routine Maintenance/Repair & “Like for Like” Replacement. Without the requirement of obtaining the City’s prior consent, Licensee shall have the right to (a) perform routine maintenance and repair of any Equipment installed on a Vertical Infrastructure approved for use by the City pursuant to this License, and (b) perform “likefor-like” replacements of Equipment so long as (i) any such “like-for-like” replacement does not alter the visible aesthetic appearance of the installed Equipment, and (ii) the resulting installation does not (A) result in an increase in the size of the License Area, (B) materially increase the weight, size or structural loading of Licensee’s Equipment or on the applicable Vertical Infrastructure beyond the loading or utilization, if any, that was established as of the Effective Date of this License or any subsequent City approval of Licensee’s Equipment for which City’s prior written consent was required, as the case may be; (c) does not change the status of Licensee’s compliance with radio frequency emission standards under applicable Laws and (d) and does not cause any interference with any municipal functions or equipment.

Page 1023 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 14
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
(b) All Other Modifications, Additions or Upgrades. Any other modification, addition or upgrade to Licensee’s Equipment installed on a Vertical Infrastructure pursuant to this License shall require the City’s prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. (c) Compliance. Notwithstanding any modification, addition and/or upgrade rights granted to Licensee under this License, all work performed by or on behalf of Licensee pursuant to this License shall be performed in compliance with all applicable provisions in this License, which includes, without limitation Licensee’s obligation to obtain and pay for all Regulatory Approvals required for the proposed modification.

6.10. Post-Completion Inspections
Within ten (10) days after Licensee completes any Equipment construction, installation or other work for which the prior written consent is required under this License, Licensee shall provide the City with a written notice that confirms the precise locations and dates on which the Licensee completed the work. The City shall have the right to inspect Licensee’s Equipment at any time after Licensee completes any construction, installation or other work in connection with this License. If the City discovers any defects or noncompliant conditions in connection with the Equipment, Licensee shall, at Licensee’s sole cost and expense, correct any such defects and conditions within a reasonable time as determined by the City but not to exceed thirty (30) days, but in no event less than fifteen (15) business days following Licensee’s receipt of the City’s written notice of the alleged defects or non-compliance conditions, provided that the defects and conditions do not present a threat to public health and safety. Inspections and any re-inspections reasonably considered necessary by the City are deemed by the Parties to be “Regulatory Fees” and Licensee shall promptly reimburse the City for the same within thirty (30) days of Licensee’s receipt of City’s invoice accompanied by reasonable evidence of the Regulatory Fees so incurred by the City.

6.11. As-Built Plans and Maps
Within thirty (30) days after the City issues a certificate of completion, Licensee shall submit to the City as-built plans and maps in a format reasonably specified by the City. In addition to any format required by the City, all as-built plans and maps shall include digital copies in a native format compatible with the City’s document management, GIS and/or other digital information management systems. Licensee’s as-built plans and maps must show the accurate location and dimensions for all Equipment. The City shall have the right to reject any as-built plans or maps for cause, in which case Licensee shall file revised as-built plans and/or maps within thirty (30) days after notice from the City. The City shall have the right to incorporate the as-built plans for the then-current description of the License Area in Exhibit A-1 and/or the then-current Approved Plans in Exhibit A2.

Page 1024 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 15
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

6.12. Title to Licensee’s Equipment and Other Improvements Except as specifically provided otherwise in this License, all Equipment and other improvements installed, constructed or placed on or about the License Area by Licensee or its Agents or Invitees will be and remain at all times Licensee’s personal property. All structural improvements to any Vertical Infrastructure and any replacement Vertical Infrastructure, as approved by the City and shown in the Approved Plans, will become City Property and remain City Property should Licensee vacate or abandon such License Area, unless the City elects in a written notice to Licensee that it does not wish to take title to such structural improvements. All replacement Vertical Infrastructure shall become City Property upon the City’s approval and acceptance. After Licensee installs any replacement Vertical Infrastructure, the City will have the right to inspect the improvements and installation work and accept, reject and require corrections to such improvements or installation work to conform such improvements or installation work to the Approved Plans and/or applicable Laws. Licensee shall make any and all such conforming corrections to any replacement Vertical Infrastructure within 60 days after a rejection by the City. Paying for the cost of the replacement Vertical Infrastructure does not provide Licensee with any ownership interest in the replacement Vertical Infrastructure, which the City shall be deemed to own. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the City’s approval of this License will be the only consideration due to Licensee in exchange for transferring title to any replacement Vertical Infrastructure to the City, and Licensee will not be entitled to any additional pecuniary or non-pecuniary consideration. Such License Area shall be deemed abandoned if Licensee’s Equipment in the License Area is not in operation for any continuous six-month period except if such non-operation is due to acts of nature or other force-majeure circumstances or beyond the reasonable control of Licensee. Subject to Sections 22 (Termination) and 26 (Surrender of License Area), Licensee may remove its Equipment from the License Area at any time after thirty (30) days’ written notice to the City.

7. LICENSEE’S MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS

7.1. General Maintenance and Repair Requirements
Licensee shall maintain all Equipment installed on, under, over, in or about the License Area in good, safe and orderly condition at all times, and shall promptly repair any damage to any Equipment whenever repair or maintenance may be required, subject to any Regulatory Approvals if required for such maintenance work. All work performed by or for Licensee under this Section 7 shall be performed: (a) in accordance with the terms and conditions in this License; (b) at Licensee’s sole cost and expense, and at no cost to the City; (c) by only qualified, trained, experienced and appropriately licensed contractors or Licensee’s Agents or other personnel; (d) in a manner and with equipment and materials that will not interfere with or impair the City’s municipal operations on or about the License Area; (e) in a safe, diligent, skillful and workmanlike manner; and (f) in compliance with all applicable Laws, which includes without limitation all applicable provisions in the Richmond Municipal Code and any conditions in any applicable Regulatory Approval(s).

Page 1025 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 16
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

7.2. Damage Reports to the City
Licensee shall promptly notify the City if Licensee discovers damage or other alteration to the Streets, any City Property or any personal or real property owned by third parties for any reason and through any cause. Notices shall contain the following information to the extent available at the time Licensee sends the notice: (a) the location where the event occurred; (b) a statement to describe the damage or other alteration and the surrounding circumstances; (c) the names and contact information for any persons or entities involved in the matter, as well as the names and contact information for any potential witnesses to the damage or other alteration; and (d) any other pertinent information. Licensee will not be deemed to have assumed liability for any such damage or other alteration by giving such notice, unless such damage or other alteration was caused by or arose in connection with Licensee’s or its Agent’s or Invitee’s act, omission, negligence or willful misconduct. Licensee’s failure to provide notice to the City shall not be a material default entitling the City to terminate this License unless Licensee or its Agents or Invitees caused such damage or other alteration and Licensee fails to repair the damage or other alteration within the time period prescribed for notice and cure under this License following License’s receipt of City’s written notice of the damage or other alteration alleged to be caused by Licensee, its Agents or Invitees. The Parties acknowledged and agree that Licensee’s failure to notify the City of damage or other alteration caused by any party other than Licensee, its Agents or Invitees may result only in an action for damages against Licensee.

7.3. Licensee’s Obligation to Make Repairs
In the event that Licensee or its Agents or Invitees directly or indirectly caused such damage or other alterations, Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair such damage or other alteration and restore the affected property to the condition that existed immediately before the damage or other alteration occurred, reasonable wear and tear excepted. If Licensee fails or refuses to perform its obligations under this Section 7 within fifteen (15) business days after Licensee’s receipt of written notice from the City, the City may (but will not be obligated to) cause the repair and restoration to be performed at Licensee’s sole cost and expense. The City may exercise its rights to perform Licensee’s obligations under this Section 7 if Licensee has not completed its repair within fifteen (15) business days’ following Licensee’s receipt of written notice from the City or without prior notice to Licensee when the City determines that the repair and/or restoration is immediately necessary to protect public health or safety. Licensee acknowledges that repair or restoration undertaken by the City shall be deemed to be Reimbursement Fees, and Licensee shall promptly reimburse the City for the same within thirty (30) days of Licensee’s receipt of City’s invoice accompanied by reasonable evidence of the Reimbursement Fees so incurred by the City.

In addition, Licensee shall indemnify, defend and hold any and all Indemnified City Parties harmless from and against any Claims in connection with such performance by the City except to the extent of the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City or any Indemnified City Parties, or any of them.

Page 1026 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 17
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

7.4. Graffiti Abatement
In addition to Licensee’s other maintenance obligations under this License, Licensee shall remove any graffiti or other similar markings from the License Area and/or the Equipment deployed under this License within three (3) days of Licensee’s receipt of written notice from the City or as may be required under the Richmond Municipal Code, whichever is greater.

8. REARRANGEMENT AND RELOCATION

8.1. Rearrangement and Relocation for City Work
Licensee acknowledges that the City, in its sole discretion and at any time, may: (1) change any street grade, width or location; (2) add, remove or otherwise change any improvements owned by the City or any other public agency located in, on, under or along any Street, which includes without limitation any sewers, storm drains, conduits, pipes, vaults, boxes, cabinets, poles and utility systems for gas, water, electric or telecommunications; and/or (3) perform any other work deemed necessary, useful or desirable by the City (collectively, “City Work”). The City reserves the rights to do any and all City Work without any admission on its part that the City would not have such rights without the express reservation in this License. In the event that the City determines that any City Work will require the Equipment to be rearranged and/or relocated Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, do or cause to be done all things necessary to accomplish such rearrangement and/or relocation. If Licensee fails or refuses to either permanently or temporarily rearrange and/or relocate the Equipment within a reasonable time which in no event shall be less than thirty (30) days following Licensee’s receipt of written notice of the City’s intention to undertake City Work which requires the rearrangement and/or relocation of Licensee’s Equipment, then thereafter, the City may (but will not be obligated to) cause the rearrangement or relocation to be performed at Licensee’s sole cost and expense. The City may exercise its rights to rearrange or relocate the Equipment without prior notice to Licensee when the City determines that the City Work is immediately necessary to protect public health or safety. The City shall not be responsible for damage to, repairs to or maintenance of the Equipment or for any associated costs except to the extent caused by the City, its employees, Agents, contractors or subcontractors. The City’s work to rearrange or relocate Licensee’s Equipment shall be deemed to be Reimbursable Fees, and Licensee shall promptly reimburse the City for the same within thirty (30) days of Licensee’s receipt of City’s invoice accompanied by reasonable evidence of the Reimbursement Fees so incurred by the City. In addition, Licensee shall indemnify, defend and hold any and all Indemnified City Parties harmless from and against any Claims in connection with rearranging or relocating the Equipment, or turning on or off any water, oil, gas, electricity or other utility service in connection with the Equipment except to the extent of the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, the Indemnified City Parties, of any of them.

Within ninety (90) days after any Equipment have been rearranged or relocated, Licensee

Page 1027 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 18
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
shall file as-built plans and maps with the City in the same manner and subject to the same requirements as provided in Section 6.11 (As-Built Plans and Maps).

8.2. Rearrangement and Relocation to Accommodate Third Parties Licensee shall reasonably cooperate with and promptly respond to requests to rearrange or relocate the Equipment to accommodate third parties authorized to use the Streets (“Third-Party Accommodations”). All costs to perform any Third-Party Accommodations shall be borne by the person or entity to be accommodated; provided, however, that Licensee shall be solely responsible to collect any costs incurred by Licensee from such third party and the City shall have no liability to Licensee for any such costs. Prior to any Third-Party Accommodations performed by Licensee, Licensee shall be permitted to require (1) either a cash deposit, bond or other surety from the person or entity to be accommodated in a commercially reasonable form and in an amount reasonably estimated by Licensee to cover the costs associated with the proposed Third-Party Accommodations; and (2) a written agreement signed by the person or entity to be accommodated to indemnify, defend and hold Licensee and its Agents harmless from and against any and all Claims that arise in connection with the proposed Third-Party Accommodations, except to the extent any Claims are directly caused by Licensee’s or its Agent’s negligence or willful misconduct. Nothing in this License shall be construed to require Licensee to perform any Third-Party Accommodations that would materially reduce, impair or otherwise diminish Licensee’s Equipment or Licensee’s operations on the License Area. Within ninety (90) days after any Third-Party Accommodations, Licensee shall file as-built plans and maps with the City in the same manner and subject to the same requirements as provided in Section 6.11 (As-Built Plans and Maps).

8.3. No Right to Rearrange or Relocate City Property
Nothing in this License will be construed to require the City or authorize Licensee to change any street grade, width or location, or add, remove or otherwise change any improvements owned by the City or any other public agency located in, on, under or along the License Area or any Street, which includes without limitation any sewers, storm drains, conduits, pipes, vaults, boxes, cabinets, poles and utility systems for gas, water, electric or telecommunications, for Licensee’s or any third party’s convenience or necessity.

9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS

9.1. Compliance with CPUC General Orders
In addition to Licensee’s obligation to maintain compliance with all other Laws, Licensee shall conduct all activities on the License Area in accordance with all applicable CPUC general orders, which includes without limitation CPUC General Order 95 and CPUC General Order 128 as those orders may be amended or superseded in the future, and all other rules, regulations and other requirements adopted or enacted by the CPUC.

Page 1028 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 19
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

9.2. Compliance with Building and Electrical Codes
In addition to Licensee’s obligation to maintain compliance with all other Laws, Licensee shall conduct all activities on the License Area in accordance with the requirements in the California Building Code and the California Electric Code as adopted by the City with any legally permitted amendments.

9.3. Compliance with FCC RF Exposure Standards
Licensee’s obligation to comply with all Laws includes all Laws related to maximum permissible exposure to RF emissions on or about the License Area, which includes all applicable FCC standards, whether such RF emissions or exposure results from the Equipment alone or from the cumulative effect of the Equipment added to all other sources on or near the License Area.

9.4. Compliance with Prevailing Wage Regulations
The services to be provided under the License may be subject to prevailing wage rate payment as set forth in California Labor Code § 1771. The Licensee shall be solely responsible in determining whether prevailing wages apply under Labor Code § 1771.

Accordingly, to the extent that any such services are subject to the prevailing wage rate payment requirements, Licensee shall and shall cause its Agents to comply with all applicable California Labor Code requirements pertaining to “public works,” including the payment of prevailing wages in connection with the services to be provided to the City hereunder (collectively, “Prevailing Wage Policies”). Within ten (10) business days following Licensee’s receipt of the City’s written request, Licensee shall make available during Licensee’s regular business hours for the City to inspect at Licensee’s corporate offices in Contra Costa County which Licensee shall designate, copies of, Licensee’s payroll records that pertain to this License and are subject to the Prevailing Wage Policies and other relevant proof of compliance with the Prevailing Wage Policies consistent with the requirements in California Labor Code § 1776, as may be amended or superseded.

The City shall also have the right to copy such records, subject to the City’s written agreement that the City shall only disclose such records to the extent that the City is required under applicable Laws to make such records available for review by or disclosure to third parties.

Licensee shall defend, indemnify and hold the City and Indemnified City Parties harmless from and against any and all present and future Claims, that arise from or in connection with Licensee’s obligation to comply with Prevailing Wage Policies and all Laws with respect to the installation, construction or other work in connection with this License, which includes without limitation any and all Claims that may be made by Licensee’s Agents or any other contractors, subcontractors or other third parties pursuant to California Labor Code §§ 1726 and 1781, as amended and added by California Senate Bill 966 (Alarcon), and as may be amended or superseded in the future.

Page 1029 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 20
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
To the extent applicable, as provided in SB 854 (Stats. 2014, ch. 28): (a) no contractor or subcontractor may be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements California Public Contracts Code § 4104, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, unless currently registered with DIR and qualified to perform public work pursuant to California Labor Code § 1725.5 (Cal. Lab. Code § 1771.1(a)); (b) no contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a public works contract unless registered with the DIR to perform public work pursuant to California Labor Code § 1725.5 (Cal. Lab.

Code § 1771.1(b)); and (c) work performed on the project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by DIR (Cal. Lab. Code § 1771.4).

Without limiting Licensee’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold the City and Indemnified City Parties harmless as provided in this Section 9.4, the City acknowledges that Licensee maintains that services to be provided under this License are not subject to Prevailing Wage Policies, and nothing in this Section 9.4 or elsewhere in this License is intended to waive or release any Claims or rights of Licensee to assert that such services are not subject to Prevailing Wage Policies.

10. PUBLIC WORKS’ OPERATIONS

10.1. City Access to License Area
Except as specifically provided otherwise in this License, the City and its Agents have the absolute right to access any License Area, in whole or in part, at any time and with or without notice for any purpose related to its municipal functions. The City will not be liable in any manner whatsoever, and Licensee expressly waives any Claims for inconvenience, disturbance, lost business, nuisance or other damages that may arise from the City’s or its Agents’ access to the License Area, which includes, without limitation, any Equipment removed in an emergency or other exigent circumstances pursuant to Section 10.4, except to the extent that the damage is caused directly and exclusively from the City’s or its Agent’s sole active negligence or willful misconduct and not contributed to by Licensee’s or its Agents’ or Invitees’ acts, omissions or negligence.

10.2. City’s Maintenance, Repairs or Alterations to License Area The City may maintain, alter, add to, repair, remove from and/or improve the License Area as the City may, in its sole discretion, deem necessary or appropriate for its streetlighting operations and other municipal functions. The City shall not be obligated to maintain or repair the License Area, in whole or in part, solely for Licensee’s benefit. Except as may be expressly provided otherwise in this License, neither any City work on the License Area nor any condition on any License Area will: (a) entitle Licensee to any damages; (b) excuse or reduce any obligation by Licensee to pay any Fees or perform any covenant under this License; or (c) constitute or be construed as a constructive eviction or termination from the License Area.

Page 1030 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 21
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

10.3. Notice to Licensee for Non-Emergency Maintenance or Repairs From time-to-time, the City may find it necessary or appropriate to perform work on the License Area that temporarily affects the Equipment or requires the Equipment to be temporarily powered down. In non-emergency circumstances, the City will use reasonable efforts to: (a) make a good-faith effort to provide prior notice to Licensee’s On-Call Representative; (b) allow Licensee’s On-Call Representative to observe the City’s work; and (c) avoid or minimize disruption to Licensee’s ordinary operations on the License Area, taking into account any unforeseen exigencies that may threaten persons or property. The provisions in this Section 10.3 will not be construed to impede or delay the City’s authority and ability to make changes to the License Areas necessary to maintain street light services, traffic control services, any municipal utility services (to the extent permissible under applicable Laws) or any other municipal functions carried out for the public’s health, safety, welfare or benefit.

10.4. Emergencies
In emergencies, and unless expressly provided in applicable Laws, the City’s work and operations will take precedence over Licensee’s operations, which includes without limitation any Equipment operated on the License Area, and the City may access the License Area in whole or in part as the City deems necessary in its sole and absolute determination and in accordance with this Section 10.4, with or without notice to Licensee.

When safe and practicable, as solely determined by the City, the City will notify Licensee of any emergency or other exigent circumstances that requires the City to remove or replace any City Property within the License Area and will allow Licensee to remove its Equipment before the City removes or replaces such City Property; provided, however, that the City will remove the Equipment from the License Area when in the City’s sole determination it would: (a) be unsafe or not practicable to wait for Licensee to perform (or cause to be performed) the work; (b) result in significant delay; or (c) otherwise threaten or compromise public health, safety, welfare or public services. The City will remove any Equipment with reasonable care and store such Equipment for retrieval by Licensee. The City shall provide notice to Licensee as soon as reasonably practicable after such emergency and removal of any of Licensee’s Equipment. Licensee shall have the right to reinstall such removed Equipment (or equivalent replacement Equipment) at Licensee’s sole expense on the License Area and in accordance with the provisions in this License and all applicable Laws. Licensee expressly acknowledges that any act(s) taken by the City pursuant to this Section 10.4, which includes without limitation any Equipment removal or storage, will not be deemed to be a forcible or unlawful entry onto the License Area or any interference with Licensee’s contractual privilege to use the License Area.

11. INTERFERENCE
Licensee may not install, maintain or operate any Equipment in a manner that interferes with or impairs other communication (radio, telephone, data and/or other transmission or reception) or computer equipment lawfully used by the City and its Agents, which includes without limitation any first responders or other public safety personnel. Such interference

Page 1031 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 22
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
will be a default by Licensee, and upon notice from the City, Licensee shall promptly eliminate such interference at no cost to the City. Licensee will be required to use its best efforts to remedy and cure such interference without any impairment to any City operations. If Licensee does not promptly cure such default, the parties acknowledge that continued interference may cause irreparable injury to the City and, therefore, the City will have the right to bring an action against Licensee to, at the City’s election, immediately enjoin such interference and/or to terminate this License. The parties acknowledge that the Licensee possesses technical expertise that puts Licensee in the best position to identify and mitigate interference sources, and Licensee shall be primarily responsible for identification and mitigation work. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City and Licensee hereby agree to comply with FCC guidelines and protocols with regard to third party interference.

12. LIENS
Licensee shall keep the License Area free and clear from any and all liens or other impositions in connection with any work performed, material furnished or obligations incurred by or for Licensee. Licensee will inform all contractors and material suppliers that provide any work, service, equipment or material to Licensee in connection with the License Area that the License Area is public property not subject to any mechanics’ liens or stop notices. In the event that any Licensee contractor or material supplier files any lien or imposition that attaches to the License Area, Licensee shall promptly (but in no case later than thirty (30) days after discovery) cause such lien or imposition to be released. In the event that Licensee does not cause such lien or imposition to be released within the thirty (30)-day period, the City will have the right, but not the obligation, to cause such lien or imposition to be released in any manner the City deems proper, which includes without limitation payment to the lienholder, with or without notice to Licensee.

Licensee shall reimburse the City for all costs and expenses incurred to cause such lien or imposition to be released (which includes without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees) within ten (10) days after Licensee receives a written demand from the City together with reasonable documentation to support such costs and expenses.

13. UTILITIES
Licensee shall be responsible to secure its own utility services for its Permitted Use; however, the City shall make good faiths effort to make its utility infrastructure available to Licensee as part of this License when the City determines that it is feasible to do so, or the City will make good faith efforts to identify an alternative and comparable Vertical Infrastructure where the City would permit Licensee to use the City’s utility infrastructure for its Permitted Use. Licensee shall not be permitted to “submeter” from any electrical service provided to the City on any License Area without the City’s prior written consent, which the City may withhold in its sole and absolute discretion. Licensee shall timely pay when due all charges for all utilities furnished to its Equipment on the License Area and shall directly pay the electric service provider in the event of any “submetering.” Any interconnection between the City’s and Licensee’s electrical facilities permitted by City shall be accomplished in compliance with all applicable Laws and all utility service

Page 1032 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 23
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
providers’ policies for such interconnection and shall not compromise or affect the City’s then-existing tariff rates.

14. TAXES AND OTHER ASSESSMENTS
Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 107.6, Licensee agrees to pay when due (and prior to delinquency) any and all taxes, assessments, charges, excises and exactions whatsoever, including without limitation any possessory interest taxes, that arise from or in connection with Licensee’s use within the License Area or Licensee’s Equipment that may be imposed on Licensee under applicable Laws. Licensee shall not allow or suffer any lien for any taxes, assessments, charges, excises or exactions whatsoever to be imposed on the License Area or Licensee’s Equipment. In the event that the City receives any tax or assessment notices on or in connection with the License Area or Licensee’s Equipment, the City shall promptly (but in no event later than thirty (30) days after receipt) forward the same, together with reasonably sufficient written documentation that details any increases in the taxable or assessable amount attributable to Licensee’s Equipment. Licensee understands and acknowledges that this License may create a possessory interest subject to taxation and that Licensee will be required to pay any such possessory interest taxes. Licensee further understands and acknowledges that any sublicense or assignment under this License and any options, extensions or renewals in connection with this License may constitute a change in ownership for taxation purposes and therefore result in a revaluation for any possessory interest created under this License.

15. INDEMNIFICATION

15.1. Licensee’s Indemnification Obligations
Licensee, for itself and its successors and assigns, shall indemnify, defend and hold the Indemnified City Parties harmless from and against any and all Claims, incurred in connection with or arising in whole or in part from any act or omission by Licensee or its Agents, licensees, customers or invitees in connection with this License or any Equipment, whether any negligence may be attributed to any Indemnified City Parties or not, whether any liability without fault is imposed or sought to be imposed on any Indemnified City Parties or not, but except to the extent that that such Claim caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, the Indemnified City Parties, or any of them. Licensee’s obligations under this Section 15 includes, without limitation, all reasonable fees, costs and expenses for attorneys, consultants and experts, and the City’s actual costs to investigate and defend against any Claim. Licensee expressly acknowledges and agrees that: (a) Licensee has an immediate and independent obligation to defend any Indemnified City Parties from any Claim that actually or potentially falls within this Section 15, even when the allegations in the Claim are or appear to be groundless, fraudulent or false; and (b) Licensee’s obligations arise at the time any Indemnified City Parties tender a Claim to Licensee and continue until such Claim’s final, non-appealable resolution. Licensee’s obligations under this Section 15.1 shall survive this License’s revocation, termination or expiration.

Page 1033 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 24
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

15.2. Licensee’s Defense of the City
In the event that any Claim is brought against any Indemnified City Parties in connection with any subject matter for which any Indemnified City Parties are indemnified by Licensee under this License, Licensee shall, upon written notice and at Licensee’s sole cost and expense, resist and defend against such Claim with competent and experienced legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the City, the Indemnified City Parties, or any of them. Such legal counsel retained by Licensee shall possess not less than ten (10) years’ experience in defending clients in similar actions or proceedings as those brought against the Indemnified City Parties; (b) is duly licensed to practice law in the State of California by the State Bar of California; (c) has no past or pending disciplinary actions by any United States tribunal or state bar association; and (d) has no actual or potential conflicts of interest with any Indemnified City Parties. Licensee shall not, without the City’s written consent, enter into any compromise or settlement agreement on any Indemnified City Parties’ behalf that: (x) admits any liability, culpability or fault whatsoever on any Indemnified City Parties’ part; or (y) requires any Indemnified City Party to take or refrain from any action, which includes without limitation any change in the City’s policies or any monetary payments. Nothing in this License shall be construed to limit or preclude any Indemnified City Parties or their respective legal counsel from cooperating with Licensee and/or participating in any judicial, administrative, alternative dispute resolution or other litigation or proceeding. Licensee’s obligations under this Section 15.2 shall survive this License’s revocation, termination or expiration.

16. INSURANCE
Prior to any construction, installation or other work by Licensee or its contractors or subcontractors in, on, under or above the Streets, Licensee shall comply with all insurance requirements and other obligations contained in Exhibit B (Licensee’s Insurance Obligations), attached hereto and incorporated herein, and shall provide the City with all required certificates and endorsements. Once in any consecutive three (3) year period, the City shall have the right to amend or replace the insurance requirements contained in Exhibit B on 60 days’ prior written notice to Licensee if the City’s risk manager determines that the then-current insurance requirements are inadequate to protect the City against risks associated with the Permitted Use or as may be required to comply with applicable Laws; provided, however, that Licensee may request to meet and confer with the City during the 60-day period to ensure that Licensee can reasonably comply with the amended or replaced requirements in Exhibit B. Any noncompliance with any insurance requirements in this License by Licensee or its contractors or subcontractors shall entitle the City to declare Licensee in default of this License subject to Licensee’s right to cure such non-compliance within the time period prescribed in Section 21.1 of this License following Licensee’s receipt of the City’s written notice alleging Licensee’s non-compliance with any required insurance in Exhibit B.

17. LIMITATIONS ON THE CITY’S LIABILITY

Page 1034 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 25
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

17.1. General Limitations
Licensee expressly acknowledges that the City is not responsible or liable to Licensee for any Claims that arise in connection with: (a) acts or omissions by persons or entities using the Streets or other areas adjoining, adjacent to or connected with any License Area; (b) any utility service interruption; (c) theft; (d) burst, stopped or leaking water, gas, sewer, steam or other pressurized pipes; (e) fires, floods, earthquakes or other force majeure; (f) any vehicular collision on or about the License Area or other City Property; (g) any costs or expenses incurred in connection with any relocation or rearrangement as provided in Section 8 (Rearrangement and Relocation); or (h) any costs or expenses incurred in connection with any removal or restoration as provided in this License; all except to the extent such events are caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, the Indemnified City Parties, or any of them. Licensee, in perpetuity, expressly waives and releases all Claims it may now or in the future have against any Indemnified City Parties, whether known or unknown, whether foreseeable or unforeseeable, that arise in connection with the events described in this Section 17 as may be related to this License or locations on or about the License Area. In no event will Licensee or its Agents be personally liable to the City for any default, breach or any other nonperformance or unpaid sum by Licensee. The provisions in this Section 17.1 shall survive the revocation, termination or expiration of this License.

17.2. Consequential, Indirect or Punitive Damages
Without limiting any indemnification obligation placed on Licensee or other waivers contained in this License, Licensee fully releases, waives and discharges forever any and all Claims against the City for consequential and incidental damages that may arise from or in connection with this License or Licensee’s use on or about the License Area, which includes without limitation any lost profits related to any disruption to Equipment, any interference with uses or operations conducted by Licensee, from any cause whatsoever, and whether or not due to the active or passive negligence or willful misconduct by the City or any Indemnified City Parties, and covenants not to sue for such damages the City, the City’s departments and all City agencies, officers, directors and employees, and all persons acting by, through or under them.

17.3. No Relocation Assistance
This License shall not create any right in Licensee to receive any relocation assistance or payment for any reason under the California Relocation Assistance Law (California Government Code §§ 7260 et seq.), the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 4601 et seq.), as either may be amended or superseded, or any similar Laws upon or after any termination. To the extent that any such Laws may apply, Licensee waives, releases and relinquishes forever any and all Claims that it may have against the City for any compensation from the City except as provided in Section 19 (Condemnation).

Page 1035 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 26
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

17.4. No Personal Liability for City Personnel
In no event will any City board, agency, member, officer, employee or other Agent be personally liable to Licensee, its successors or assigns, for any default, breach, other nonperformance or sum unpaid sum by the City. The provisions in this Section 17.4 shall survive this License’s revocation, termination or expiration.

18. CASUALTY

18.1. City’s Rights Upon a Casualty Event
In the event the License Area in whole or in part becomes damaged due to any cause, the City will have no obligation whatsoever to repair or replace the damaged License Area. The City shall only be responsible to Licensee for damage to Licensee’s Equipment to the extent caused by City, its employees, Agents, contractors or subcontractors. Within approximately thirty (30) days after the date on which the City discovers damage or destruction to the License Area, the City will give Licensee notice of the City’s decision whether to repair or replace the damaged License Area and its goodfaith estimate of the amount of time they will need to complete the work. If the City cannot complete the work within forty-five (45) days after the date that the City specifies in its notice, or if the City elects not to do the work, then Licensee will have the right to terminate this License on fifteen (15) days’ notice to the City. If Licensee elects not to terminate this License, payment of the License Fee shall abate until Licensee is able to resume full onair operation of its Equipment in the ordinary course of Licensee’s business, except that Licensee shall not be exempted from its obligations to reimburse the City for the City’s actual costs caused by Licensee during this period. If the City elects to remove, rather than repair or replace, the damaged or destroyed License Area, then this License will automatically terminate on the last day of the month in which the removal occurs. If the acts of third parties or an act of nature or other force-majeure circumstance outside the control of Licensee or its Agents or Invitees damages or destroys the License Area to such an extent that, in the City’s reasonable determination, the Equipment on the License Area cannot be operated in a safe manner, the City may elect to terminate this License on thirty (30) days’ notice to Licensee and require Licensee to remove the Equipment from the damaged License Area before the termination date specified in the City’s notice.

18.2. Licensee’s Termination Rights Upon a Casualty Event In the event that the City terminates this License pursuant to Section 18.1 (City’s Rights Upon a Casualty Event), the City will prioritize its review of any request by Licensee for a substantially similar license on a different pole as a replacement for this License and shall prioritize its review of any request by Licensee for Regulatory Approvals for a temporary facility.

Page 1036 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 27
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

18.3. Statutory Waiver
The parties understand, acknowledge and agree that this License fully governs their rights and obligations in the event that the License Area becomes damaged or destroyed, and, to the extent applicable, the City and Licensee each hereby waives and releases the provisions in California Civil Code §§ 1932(2) and 1933(4) or any similar Laws.

18.4 Insurance Proceeds
In the event the License Area in whole or in part becomes damaged due to any cause, Licensee shall be entitled to collect all insurance proceeds payable to Licensee; however, the Vertical Infrastructure itself and any related improvements in the License Area, other than Licensee’s Equipment, shall be the City’s fixtures and Licensee’s recovery of any insurance proceeds shall not reduce the proceeds that the City is entitled to collect.

19. CONDEMNATION
This License will automatically terminate as to the part taken or transferred on the date the permanent taking or transfer occurs. The City will be entitled to any award paid or made in connection with the taking or any sums paid in lieu of such taking. Licensee will have no Claim against the City for the value of any unexpired Term of this License or otherwise except that Licensee may claim any portion of the award that is specifically allocable to Licensee’s loss or damage to Licensee’s Equipment. The parties understand, acknowledge and agree that this Section 19 is intended to fully govern the parties’ rights and obligations in the event of a permanent taking. Licensee and the City each hereby waives and releases any right to terminate this License in whole or in part under California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 1265.120 and 1265.130 and under any similar Laws to the extent applicable to this License.

20. ASSIGNMENTS AND OTHER TRANSFERS

20.1. General Restriction
Licensee shall have no right to assign or transfer any right, title or interest, in whole or in part, in, under or through this License without the City’s prior written consent. The City shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to any proposed assignment; provided, however, that the parties acknowledge that the City may reasonably withhold its consent to any proposed assignment under the following circumstances: (1) the proposed assignee lacks the necessary Regulatory Approvals to conduct the Permitted Use or perform all Licensee’s obligations; (2) the City reasonably determines that the proposed assignee lacks the financial qualifications to perform all Licensee’s obligations; (3) Licensee refuses to reimburse the City for the reasonable and documented costs to consider the proposed assignment and/or the proposed assignee, such costs not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00); and/or (4) at any time in which any Default by Licensee remains uncured.

Page 1037 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 28
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

20.2. Permitted Assignments
Notwithstanding Section 20.1, Licensee will be permitted to assign or otherwise transfer this License without the City’s prior consent but with notice to the City, to: (a) an entity that acquires all or substantially all Licensee’s assets in the market in which the City is located (as the “market area” is or may be defined by the FCC); (b) Licensee’s parent; (c) an entity that acquires a controlling interest in Licensee by a change in stock ownership or partnership interest; or (d) an entity controlled by Licensee (each a “Permitted Assignment”). Notwithstanding anything in this License to the contrary, a Permitted Assignment will be subject to all the following conditions: (i) the assignee may use the License Area only for the Permitted Use and for no other purpose whatsoever; (ii) the assignee possesses all Regulatory Approvals necessary to lawfully install, operate, and maintain Equipment on the License Area; (iii) Licensee provides the City with notice no later than thirty (30) days following the effective date of such Permitted Assignment, stating the name and contact information for the assignee; (iv) Licensee was not in default of this License beyond the applicable notice and cure period on the effective date of the Permitted Assignment; (v) the assignee has assumed, in writing, all of Licensee’s obligations under this License from and after the effective date of the Permitted Assignment. Additionally, within fifteen (15) business days following Licensee’s receipt of the City’s written request, Licensee shall furnish the City with reasonable written evidence that the assignee or transferee has assumed in writing all of Licensee’s obligations under this License from and after the effect date of the Permitted Assignment. If the City chooses to review the Permitted Assignment, Licensee shall be responsible to reimburse the City up to Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for legal fees and City staff time actually incurred by the City to review the Permitted Assignment. Such reimbursement shall be paid within thirty (30) days after Licensee’s receipt of the City’s invoice accompanied by reasonable evidence of the costs incurred by the City.

20.3. Effect of Assignment
No assignment or transfer by Licensee, consent to assignment by the City, or Permitted Assignment will relieve or release Licensee from any obligation on its part under this License, unless expressly provided in a writing signed by the City. Instead Licensee shall remain jointly and severally liable along with the assignee for all obligations to be performed by the assignee.

Any assignment or transfer that is not in compliance with this Section 20 will be voidable by the City upon forty-five (45) days’ prior written notice and opportunity cure. The City may issue such notice that an assignment or transfer is voidable at any time and the City’s failure to issue such notice is not a waiver of such right. The City’s receipt or acceptance of any License Fee, Regulatory Fees, Reimbursement Fees, or other payments from a proposed assignee or transferee, or assignee or transferee pursuant to a Permitted Assignment will not be deemed to be the City’s consent to such assignment or Permitted Assignment, as the case may be.

Page 1038 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 29
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

21. DEFAULT

21.1. Defaults and Cure Periods
The parties agree that any failure to perform or observe any term, condition, obligation or other provision in this License shall be a default. For any monetary default, the defaulting party shall have fifteen (15) days after the party’s receipt of written notice from the nondefaulting party to perfect a cure. The defaulting party shall not be entitled to any additional time to cure a monetary default. For any non-monetary default, the defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days after the party’s receipt of written notice from the nondefaulting party to perfect a cure; provided, however, that for any non-monetary default that cannot reasonably be cured within such thirty (30) day period, the defaulting party shall have additional time as is reasonably necessary to perfect the cure if the defaulting party commences to cure the default within the first thirty (30) days after the party’s receipt of the written notice and diligently pursues the cure to completion. Delay in curing a nonmonetary default will be excused on a day for day basis due to any Act of God, event for force majeure, or other circumstance beyond the reasonable control of the defaulting party. To the extent that this License batches multiple Vertical Infrastructures under one license as described in Section 2.1, the City must identify in its written notice to Licensee the specific Vertical Infrastructure(s) that is/are subject to the notice of default.

21.2. Licensee’s Remedies
Except as may be otherwise provided elsewhere in this License, Licensee’s sole remedies for the City’s uncured default will be (1) to terminate the License on thirty (30) days’ prior written notice; and (2) an action for damages subject to the provisions in Section 17 (Limitations on the City’s Liability).

21.3. City’s Remedies
In addition to all other legal and equitable rights and remedies available to the City, the City will have the following remedies after an uncured default by Licensee:

21.3.1. License Continuation
Without prejudice to its right to other remedies, the City may continue this License with the right to enforce all its rights and remedies, which includes without limitation the right to receive the License Fee and other sums as they may become due.

21.3.2. License Termination
If the City determines, in its sole judgment, that Licensee’s default materially impairs the City’s ability to perform its municipal functions or threatens public health, safety or welfare, then the City may terminate this License on written notice to Licensee, provided, however, if the License contains more than one Vertical Infrastructure in the License due to batching of multiple Vertical Infrastructures as permitted under this License, then the License shall

Page 1039 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 30
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
only terminate as to the Vertical Infrastructure contained in the City’s written notice of default delivered to Licensee under Section 21.1 above, and the License shall remain in full force and effect as to the remaining Vertical Infrastructure(s) that are not identified in the City’s written notice of default delivered to Licensee.

21.3.3. Default Fees
In addition to all other rights and remedies available to the City, the City may require Licensee to pay an additional fee for any and all reasonable and actual costs incurred by the City in connection with a default event to reimburse the City’s reasonable and actual administrative cost to enforce compliance with this License (each a “Default Fee”) as described on Exhibit C. Licensee shall pay the Default Fee within thirty (30) days after Licensee’s receipt of the City’s written demand for reimbursement and reasonable documentation to support such reasonable and actual costs. If Licensee fails to timely pay the Default Fee or cure the underlying default within the applicable cure period in Section 21.1 above, the City shall have the right to assess to Licensee an additional Default Fee pursuant to a further written notice to Licensee provided that such additional Default Fee may not be assessed more often than one (1) time in any consecutive thirty (30) day period, or until the expiration of the applicable cure period under the License, whichever date is later to occur. Such additional Default Fee shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of Licensee’s receipt of the additional Default Fee. Licensee’s obligation to pay Default Fees is separate and distinct from the underlying default. Default Fee payments shall not be deemed to cure the underlying default.

21.4. Cumulative Remedies
Except as otherwise provided in this License, all rights and remedies available to the City or Licensee are cumulative, and not a substitute for, any rights or remedies otherwise available to the City or Licensee.

22. TERMINATION
This License may be terminated as follows: (1) by a non-defaulting party upon written notice if the defaulting party remains in default beyond any applicable cure period; or (2) by Licensee upon sixty (60) days’ prior written notice to the City for any or no reason. In addition, the City has the right to terminate this License on written notice to Licensee when the City determines, in the City’s sole discretion, that Licensee’s operations on or about the License Area adversely affect or threaten public health and safety or on thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to Licensee when the City determines, in the City’s sole discretion, that Licensee’s operations on or about the License Area materially interfere with the City’s municipal functions or require the City to maintain Vertical Infrastructure that the City no longer needs for its own purposes. If the City terminates this License for reasons unrelated to Licensee’s failure to perform under this License, the City shall make good faith efforts to prioritize its review of any request by Licensee for a substantially similar license on a different pole as a replacement for this License.

Page 1040 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 31
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

23. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

23.1. Limitations on Hazardous Materials Use
Licensee covenants and agrees that neither Licensee nor its Agents, clients, customers, invitees, guests, tenants, subtenants, licensees, assignees and/or sublicensees will cause or permit any Hazardous Material to be brought upon, kept, used, stored, generated, disposed or Released in, on, under or about the License Area or any other City Property, in whole or part, or transported to or from any City Property in any manner that violates any Environmental Laws; provided, however, that Licensee may use Hazardous Materials in small quantities that are customarily used for routine operation, cleaning and maintenance and so long as all such Hazardous Materials are contained, handled and used in compliance with all Environmental Laws.

23.2. Notice to the City After a Release
Licensee shall immediately notify the City if and when Licensee learns or has reason to believe any Hazardous Material Release has occurred in, on, under or about the License Area or other City Property. Licensee will not be deemed to have assumed liability for any such Release by giving such notice, unless such Release was caused by or arose in connection with Licensee’s or its Agent’s, client’s, customer’s, invitee’s, guest’s, tenant’s, subtenant’s, licensee’s, assignee’s and/or sublicensee’s acts, omissions or negligence.

23.3. Licensee’s Hazardous Material Indemnification Obligations If Licensee breaches any obligations contained in this Section 23, or if any act, omission or negligence by Licensee or its Agents, clients, customers, invitees, guests, tenants, subtenants, licensees, assignees and/or sublicensees results in any contamination on or about the License Area or other City Property, or in a Hazardous Material Release from, on, about, in or beneath the License Areas or any other City Property, in whole or in part, or any Environmental Law violation, then Licensee, for itself and its successors and assigns, shall indemnify, defend and hold the City and any Indemnified City Parties harmless, from and against any and all Claims (including damages for decrease in value of the License Area or other City Property, the loss or restriction of the use of usable space in the License Area or other City Property and sums paid in settlement of Claims, attorneys’ fees, consultants’ fees, and experts’ fees and related costs) that arises during or after the Term related to or in connection with such Release or violation; provided, however, Licensee shall not be liable for any Claims to the extent such Release or violation was caused directly and exclusively by the City’s sole active negligence or willful misconduct. Licensee’s indemnification obligation includes all costs incurred in connection with any activities required to Investigate and Remediate any Hazardous Material brought or Released onto the License Area or other City Property by Licensee or its Agents, clients, customers, invitees, guests, tenants, subtenants, licensees, assignees and/or sublicensees, and to restore the License Area or other City Property to its condition prior to such introduction or Release, or to correct any Environmental Law violation. Licensee specifically acknowledges and agrees that it has an immediate and

Page 1041 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 32
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
independent obligation to defend the City and the other Indemnified City Parties from any Claim that actually or potentially falls within this indemnity provision even if the allegations supporting the Claim are or may be groundless, fraudulent or false, and that said obligation arises at the time such Claim is tendered to Licensee by the Indemnified City Party and continues until the Claim is finally resolved. Without limiting the foregoing, if Licensee or any of its Agents, clients, customers, invitees, guests, tenants, subtenants, licensees, assignees and/or sublicensees causes any Hazardous Material Release on, about, in or beneath the License Area or other City Property, then in any such event Licensee shall, immediately, at no expense to any Indemnified City Party, take any and all necessary actions to return the License Area and/or other City Property, as applicable, to the condition existing prior to such Hazardous Materials Release on the License Area or other City Property or otherwise abate the Release in accordance with all Environmental Laws, except to the extent such Release was caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, the Indemnified City Parties, or any of them.

Licensee shall afford the City a full opportunity to participate in any discussions with regulatory agencies regarding any settlement agreement, cleanup or abatement agreement, consent decree or other compromise or proceeding that involves Hazardous Material Release covered under this Section 23.

24. RULES AND REGULATIONS
At all times throughout the Term, Licensee shall faithfully comply with any and all reasonable rules, regulations and instructions that the City may from time-to-time establish and/or amend with respect to the Permitted Use, the License Area or the Streets.

25. PERFORMANCE BOND
Before the City issues any Regulatory Approval required to commence construction, installation or other work in connection with the Equipment, Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, post a performance bond from a surety and in a form acceptable to the City in an amount reasonably necessary to cover the cost to remove the Equipment and all associated improvements and completely restore all affected areas based on a written estimate from a qualified contractor with experience in wireless facilities removal. The written estimate must include the cost to remove all the Equipment and all associated improvements, which includes, without limitation, all antennas, radios, batteries, generators, utilities, cabinets, mounts, brackets, hardware, cables, wires, conduits, structures, shelters, towers, poles, footings and foundations, whether above ground or below ground, constructed or installed in connection with the Equipment, plus the cost to completely restore any areas affected by the removal work to a condition that is neat, clean, safe and compliant with applicable laws. In establishing or adjusting the bond amount required under this condition, and in accordance with California Government Code § 65964(a), the City shall take into consideration any information provided by Licensee regarding the cost to remove the Equipment as provided in this Section 25. The performance bond shall expressly survive the Term to the extent required to completely remove the subject Equipment and restore the affected areas in accordance with this

Page 1042 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 33
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
Section 25. This Section 25 shall only apply to the same extent that a substantially similar performance bond requirement is required by the City Council’s Policy Regulating Small Wireless Facilities, as this Policy may be amended or superseded from time to time.

26. SURRENDER OF LICENSE AREA
Within a reasonable time, as determined by the City Engineer, which absent an emergency as determined by the City Engineer shall be no less than thirty (30) days after Licensee’s receipt of a written demand from the City following the expiration or earlier termination of this License, Licensee shall, at Licensee’s sole cost and expense, remove all Equipment from the License Area and restore all affected areas to a condition compliant with all applicable Laws, in at least as good as the condition existed immediately before such Equipment was installed, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and to the City’s satisfaction. The City may, in its discretion, extend the thirty (30)-day period by written notice to Licensee. In addition to the foregoing, in the event that this License involves replacement Vertical Infrastructure, Licensee shall, at the City’s sole discretion, replace the Vertical Infrastructure with either (i) a standard City pole, or (ii) the Vertical Infrastructure that existed immediately prior to Licensee’s replacement of same with the replacement Vertical Infrastructure. The City’s acceptance of any replacement Vertical Infrastructure shall be in accordance with Section 6.12. If Licensee fails to timely perform its removal and restoration obligations under this License, then: (a) Licensee shall remain responsible for all its obligations under this License and liable for all Claims that may arise in connection with the Equipment through and until such Equipment is completely removed and the affected areas are completely restored; (b) the City shall have the right (but not the obligation) to perform such obligations; (c) the City shall have the right to store, sell or destroy any Equipment, improvements, personal property or other things installed by Licensee in connection with this License; and (d) the City’s removal and restoration costs performed on behalf of Licensee shall be deemed to be Reimbursable Fees, and Licensee shall promptly reimburse the City for the same within thirty (30) days of Licensee’s receipt of the City’s invoice accompanied by reasonable evidence of the Reimbursement Fees so incurred by the City. Within ninety (90) days after Licensee completes the removal of Licensee’s Equipment, Licensee shall file a punch list of any remaining improvements not removed, including but not limited to conduits, utility boxes and handholes, as depicted on the most current as built plans and maps on file with the City.

27. INSPECTIONS AND REPORTS

27.1. License Area Inspections
At all reasonable times throughout the Term, the City shall have the right (but not the obligation) to: (a) inspect all the Equipment, all appurtenant structures and any other equipment or improvements in the Streets constructed, installed, laid, maintained or operated by Licensee pertaining to this License; and (b) evaluate Licensee’s compliance

Page 1043 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 34
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
with this License and any Regulatory Approval in connection with the Equipment. In the event that any such inspection or evaluation concludes that any Equipment was installed, operated or maintained without all Regulatory Approvals or there is a “Material Defect” in the Equipment installed, operated or maintained pursuant to any Regulatory Approval, then the costs of the City’s inspection or evaluation, including any costs or expenses by any third-party inspectors or consultants, shall be deemed a Regulatory Fee, and Licensee shall promptly reimburse the City for the same within thirty (30) days of Licensee’s receipt of the City’s invoice accompanied by reasonable evidence of the Regulatory Fee so incurred by the City. A “Material Defect” means: (1) a substantial deviation from the Approved Plans; and/or (2) an existing violation of an objective health and safety standard which materially and adversely affects the public health or safety of the general public.

27.2. Records Maintenance and Audits
Licensee shall maintain throughout the Term (and for at least four (4) years after this License expires or terminates) the following records in physical format at Licensee’s Office and in an electronic format: (a) identification information and physical location (e.g., a physical address and/or GPS coordinates) for all Equipment within the City’s territorial and/or jurisdictional boundaries; and (b) a ledger or other similar document that contains the amount, payment date and reason for all sums paid to the City pursuant to this License. To determine whether Licensee has fully and accurately paid all sums payable to the City under this License, if any, the City, or its designee, will have the right (but not the obligation) to inspect, audit and make copies of Licensee’s records at Licensee’s Office during regular business hours on thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to Licensee once every three (3) years, but if the City discovers any material discrepancies in payment by Licensee, the City shall have the right to conduct additional audits within such three (3)-year period. Any City copying of records pursuant to this Section 27.2, shall be subject to the City’s written agreement that the City shall only disclose such records to the extent that the City is required under applicable Laws to make such records available for review by or disclosure to third parties.

27.3. Annual Licensee Build-Plan Forecasts
With Licensee’s first filing of a new application for a License during each year of the Term of this License, Licensee shall submit a non-binding forecast of the number and general areas within the City that Licensee is then forecasting to apply for new applications and modifications to existing Equipment pursuant to then existing Licenses. The forecast shall include to the extent known by Licensee at the time of the filing, the anticipated schedules for all new Equipment and repairs, replacements and modifications to existing Equipment The Parties acknowledge that the non-binding forecast is designed to try and generally assist the City to coordinate its own public improvements and other capital improvement projects by third parties; however, Licensee shall have no liability to the City resulting from any inaccuracies in the information presented in Licensee’s forecast. If Licensee has filed a non-binding forecast with the City in connection with any other License, then Licensee’s

Page 1044 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 35
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
annual filing requirement of a non-binding forecast for this License shall be deemed fully satisfied.

28. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

28.1. Notices
Except as may be specifically provided otherwise in this License, all notices, demands or other correspondence required to be given in connection with or pursuant to this License must be written and delivered through (i) an established national courier service that maintains delivery records and confirmations; (ii) hand delivery; or (iii) certified or registered U.S. Mail with prepaid postage and return receipt requested, and addressed as follows:

TO CITY: City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, California 94804
Attn: City Manager
with copies to: City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, California 94804
Attn: City Attorney
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, California 94804
Attn: IT Director
TO LICENSEE: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Attn: Tower Asset Group – Lease Administration
Re: AT&T-City of Concord Pole License
Fixed Asset #___________________
1025 Lenox Park Blvd. NE, 3rd Floor
Atlanta, GA 30319
with copies to: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Attn: Legal Department – Network Operations
Re: AT&T-City of Concord Pole License
Fixed Asset #___________________
208 S. Akard Street
Dallas, TX 75202-4206
All notices, demands or other correspondence in connection with this License will be deemed to have been delivered: (a) the date delivery is received by personal delivery, certified or registered U.S. Mail with return receipt requested, or overnight delivery; or (b)

Page 1045 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 36
DRAFT Pole License Agreement
the date an attempt to make delivery fails if a party changes its address without proper notice or refuses to accept delivery after an attempt. Any copies required to be given constitute an administrative step for the parties’ convenience and not actual notice. The parties may change the notice addresses above from time-to-time through written notice to the addresses above or the then-current notice address.

28.2. Waivers
No failure by either the City or Licensee to insist that the other strictly perform any obligation, term, covenant or condition under this License or to exercise any rights, powers or remedies in connection with the other party’s failure to strictly perform such obligation, term, covenant or condition no matter how long the failure to insist on such performance or exercise such rights, powers or remedies, will be deemed to waive any default for non-performance. No behaviors, patterns or customs that may arise between the parties with respect to their performance required under this License will be deemed to waive any rights, powers or remedies the parties’ may have to insist on strict performance. Neither Licensee’s payment nor the City’s or its Agents’ acceptance of any License Fee or any other sums due to the City or its Agents under this License during any such default will be deemed to cure any such default, waive the City’s right to demand material compliance with such obligation, term, covenant or condition or be deemed to be an accord and satisfaction for any Claim the City may have for further or additional sums.

Any express waiver by either the City or Licensee in connection with any default or obligation to perform any provision, term, covenant or condition under this License will: (i) be limited to the specific default or performance for which the express waiver is granted; (ii) not be deemed to be a continuing waiver; and (iii) not affect any other default or performance no matter how similar or contemporaneous such other default or performance may be. The City’s or Licensee’s consent given in any specific instance in connection with or pursuant to this License will not relieve the City or Licensee from the obligation to secure the other’s consent in any other or future specific instances, no matter how similar or contemporaneous the request for consent may be.

28.3. Integration; Amendments
This License constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties, and supersedes any and all prior agreements and understandings, whether written or oral, with respect to the subject matter covered in this License. This License and any default in connection with this License may not be orally changed, waived, discharged, altered, modified, amended or terminated. This License and any default in connection with this License may not be changed, waived, discharged, altered, modified, amended or terminated, except by a written instrument signed by both parties.

28.4. Interpretation
The parties acknowledge and agree that the following interpretive rules will be applicable to this License:

Page 1046 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 37
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

28.4.1. General
Whenever required by the context, the singular includes the plural and vice versa; the masculine gender includes the feminine or neuter genders and vice versa; and defined terms encompass all their correlated forms (e.g., the definition for “indemnify” applies to “indemnity,” “indemnification,” etc.).

28.4.2. Joint and Several Liability
In the event that the City consents to enter into this License with more than one Licensee, which consent the City may withhold or condition in the City’s sole and absolute discretion, the obligations and liabilities imposed on Licensee under this License will be joint and several among the multiple Licensees to this License.

28.4.3. Captions and Other Reference Material
The section captions in this License and the table of contents have been included for the parties’ convenience and reference and neither the captions nor the table of contents in no way define or limit the scope or intent of any provision in this License.

28.4.4. Time
References in this License to “days” mean calendar days, unless specifically provided otherwise. A “business day” means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a bank or City holiday. If the last day in any period to give notice, reply to a notice or to undertake any other action occurs on a day that is not a business day, then the last day for giving notice, replying to the notice or undertaking any other action will be the next business day. Except as modified in this Section 28.4.4, time is of the essence with respect to all provisions in this License for which a definite time for performance is specified.

28.4.5. Inclusive Words and/or Phrases
Inclusive terms and/or phrases, which includes without limitation the terms and/or phrases “including,” “such as” or similar words or phrases that follow any general or specific term, phrase, statement or matter may not be construed to limit the term, phrase, statement or matter to the stated terms, statements or matters, or the listed items that follow the inclusive term or phrase, whether any non-limitation language or disclaimers, such as “including, but not limited to” and/or “including without limitation” are used or not. Rather, the stated term, phrase, statement or matter will be interpreted to refer to all other items or matters that could reasonably fall within such term, phrase, statement or matter given its broadest interpretation.

Page 1047 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 38
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

28.5. Successors and Assigns
Except as may be expressly provided in this License, the conditions, covenants, promises and terms contained in this License will bind and inure to the benefit of the City and Licensee and their respective successors and assigns.

28.6. Brokers
The parties represent to each other that neither has had any contact, dealings or communications with any Broker in connection with this License, whose commission, if any, would be paid pursuant to a separate written agreement between such Broker and such party with which such Broker contracted. In the event that any Broker perfects any claim or finder’s fee based upon any such contact, dealings or communications, the party to such written contract with such Broker shall indemnify the other party from all Claims brought by such Broker. This Section 28.6 will survive this License’s expiration or earlier termination.

28.7. Governing Law; Venue
This License must be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California and the Richmond City Charter, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law. This License is made, entered and will be performed in the City of Richmond, County of Contra Costa, State of California. Any action concerning this License must be brought and heard in the California Superior Court for the County of Contra Costa.

28.8. Litigation Fees and Costs
In the event the City or Licensee prevails in an action to enforce its rights under this License, the prevailing shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred in connection with such action.

28.9. Recording
Licensee acknowledges and agrees that: (1) this License affects the City’s personal property and therefore cannot be recorded in any official records; (2) Licensee shall not have the right to record this License, any memorandum or any short-form agreement in relation to this License; and (3) Licensee shall, at Licensee’s sole cost and expense, remove any document or other instrument recorded against the City’s title to any City Property promptly upon the City’s request or demand. In the event that this License affects or is deemed to affect any real property owned by the City, Licensee may not record any document or instrument in connection with this License without the City’s prior written consent, which the City may withhold in the City’s sole and absolute discretion.

Page 1048 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
City of Richmond, CA 39
DRAFT Pole License Agreement

28.10. No Third-Party Beneficiaries
This License is not intended to (and shall not be construed to) give any third party, which includes without limitation Licensee’s customers or any other third-party beneficiaries, any right, title or interest in this License or the real or personal property(ies) that may be affected by the same.

28.11. Survival
All terms, provisions, covenants, conditions and obligations in this License will survive this License’s expiration or termination when, by their sense or context, such provisions, covenants, conditions or obligations: (1) cannot be observed or performed until this License’s expiration or earlier termination; (2) expressly so survive; or (3) reasonably should survive this License’s expiration or earlier termination. Notwithstanding any other provision in this License, the parties’ rights to enforce any and all indemnities, representations and warranties given or made to the other party under this License or any provision in this License will not be affected by this License’s expiration or termination.

28.12. Severability
If any provision in this License or such provision’s application to any person, entity or circumstances is or held by any court with competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable: (1) such provision or its application to such person, entity or circumstance will be deemed severed from this License; (2) all other provisions in this License or their application to any person, entity or circumstance will not be affected; and (3) all other provisions in this License or their application to any person, entity or circumstance will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by Law, except to the extent that such enforcement would (a) be manifestly unreasonable or manifestly inequitable under all the circumstances or (b) undermine one or both parties’ fundamental purpose in entering this License.
[END OF AGREEMENT – SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]

Page 1049 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
The City and Licensee executed this License as of the date last written below:

THE CITY: LICENSEE:

City of Richmond, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC,
a California municipal corporation a Delaware limited liability company and charter city
By: AT&T Mobility Corporation
Its: Manager
By: __________________________ By: __________________________ Its: City Manager Its: __________________________
Date: __________________________ Date: __________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________
Teresa Stricker
City Attorney
ATTEST:

By: __________________________
Pamela Christian
City Clerk
[END OF SIGNATURES – EXHIBITS AND SCHEDULES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]

Page 1050 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
SCHEDULE 1

ANNUAL LICENSE FEE
YEAR

OF TERM YEAR ANNUAL LICENSE FEE
1 2021 $270.00
2 2022 $278.10
3 2023 $286.44
4 2024 $295.04
5 2025 $303.89
6 2026 $313.00
7 2027 $322.39
8 2028 $332.07
9 2029 $342.03
10 2030 $352.29

Page 1051 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
SCHEDULE 2
CITY’S ESTIMATED FAIR MARKET LICENSE FEES

YEAR ANNUAL

LICENSE FEE
2021 $1,500.00
2022 $1,545.00
2023 $1,591.35
2024 $1,639.09
2025 $1,688.26
2026 $1,738.91
2027 $1,791.08
2028 $1,844.81
2029 $1,900.16
2030 $1,957.16
2031 $2,015.87
2032 $2,076.35
2033 $2,138.64
2034 $2,202.80
2035 $2,268.88
2036 $2,336.95
2037 $2,407.06
2038 $2,479.27
2039 $2,553.65
2040 $2,630.26

Page 1052 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
EXHIBIT A-1

LICENSE AREA
(A site survey that depicts the location of the Vertical Infrastructure within the City and the location of the Licensee’s attachments to such Vertical Infrastructure appears behind this coversheet. Pursuant to Section 6.11 of this License, the City shall have the right to substitute post-construction surveys and/or as-built drawings of the completed facility(ies) in place of the Approved Plans.)

Page 1053 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
EXHIBIT A-2

APPROVED PLANS
(Prior to the issuance of a construction permit(s), the Licensee shall tender its Preliminary Plans as this exhibit. After the City issues a construction permit(s), the Approved Plans shall be substituted in place of the Preliminary Plans in accordance with Section 6.2 of this License. Pursuant to Section 6.11 of this License, the City shall have the right to substitute postconstruction surveys and/or as-built drawings of the completed facility(ies) in place of the Approved Plans.)

Page 1054 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}

EXHIBIT B

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
In all instances where LICENSEE or its representatives will be licensing or using City of Richmond (City) property for an extended period, the City requires the following insurance requirements and limits.

LICENSEE shall carry and maintain for the duration of the License insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the LICENSEE’s, its agents’, representatives’, employees’ or vendor’s use of the License Area. Maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the License. Failure to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material default of the License subject to the terms and conditions of Section 21.1 of the License.

LICENSEE agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which it has agreed to provide Commercial General Liability insurance, LICENSEE shall look solely to its insurance for recovery. LICENSEE hereby grants to CITY, on behalf of any insurer providing Commercial General Liability insurance to either LICENSEE or CITY with respect to the services of LICENSEE herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said LICENSEE may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Original, signed certificates and separate policy endorsement, including the City as an additional insured by endorsement for commercial general liability coverage with respect to this License, as well as a waiver of subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance, shall be received by the City before occupancy may occur. However, failure to do so shall not operate as a waiver of these insurance requirements.

City reserves the right to modify or require additional coverages for specific risk exposures depending on scope of the License once in any consecutive three (3) year period with at least sixty (60) days’ prior written notice to LICENSEE.

Required coverage is detailed below. The policy limits of coverage shall be made available to the full limits of the policy. The limits stated herein shall not serve to reduce the policy limits of coverage of LICENSEE.

Scope of Insurance – the following forms shall be provided and coverage shall be at least as broad as the following:

1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001).

2. Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability coverage (ISO Form CA 0001, Code 1, Any Auto).

Page 1055 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}

3. Original Additional Insured Endorsements for Commercial General Liability (ISO Form CG 20 10 or its equivalent) with primary and non-contributory language.

4. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California including Employer’s Liability (for LICENSEE’s with employees).

5. Original Waiver of Subrogation for Workers’ Compensation Insurance (if applicable).

6. Property self-insurance against all risks of loss to LICENSEE improvements, betterments and contents.

Required Coverage Minimum Limits
Workers’ Compensation
and Employers’ Liability
Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1 million Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease and policy limit. If LICENSEE is self-insured, provide a certificate of
Permission to Self-Insure, signed by the California
Department of Industrial Relations and Self-Insurance. If LICENSEE is a sole proprietor (has no employees) than
LICENSEE must sign “Contractor Release of Liability”
found at:
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

Commercial General
Liability
(primary and excess limits
combined)
$2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If the policy includes a general
aggregate, either the general aggregate shall apply
separately to this project, service or location or the
minimum required aggregate limit shall be twice the
per occurrence limit ($4 million aggregate).

Policy shall also include coverage for liability arising out of the use and operation of any City-owned or City-furnished equipment used or operated by the LICENSEE, its
employees, agents or others with LICENSEE’s permission.

Policy shall be endorsed to include the City of Richmond as an additional insured by endorsement with respect to this License.

Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

Property Self-Insurance –
Only applicable to
licenses of City property
involving LICENSEE
Total value of all LICENSEE improvements,
betterments, and contents.

The City of Richmond shall be named as joint loss payee as its interest may appear. LICENSEE self-insures its
property insurance and in satisfaction of the waiver of subrogation requirement LICENSEE will include the City as

Page 1056 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
improvements,
betterments and contents
a joint loss payee to the extent of its insurable interest which would have been covered had LICENSEE
purchased property insurance.

LICENSEE’S Contractors
and Consultants
LICENSEE’S contractors and consultants of every type
that will perform work on the City’s property must meet the insurance requirements listed above (except property
insurance), and the City shall be included by each
contractor and consultant as an additional insured on the commercial general liability coverage. Such coverage shall remain in place for the duration of the contractor’s or consultant’s work on the License Area subject to the
License.

Required Policy
Conditions
Additional Insured
Endorsement
Applicable to Commercial General Liability Coverage.

The City of Richmond, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as insureds for liability caused, in whole or in part, by ownership,
maintenance or use of that part of the License Area
licensed or used by the LICENSEE.

Primary and
Noncontributory
The LICENSEE’s insurance coverage must be primary as
it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance
maintained by the City is wholly separate from the
insurance of the LICENSEE, shall be excess of the
LICENSEE’s insurance, and shall not contribute with it.

A. M. Best Rating A:VII or Better. If the A.M. Best Rating falls below the required rating, LICENSEE must replace coverage
immediately and provide notice to City.

Waiver of Subrogation
Endorsement Form
LICENSEE’s insurer will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for Workers’ Compensation Insurance during the life of this contract.

SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

Deductibles and SelfInsured RetentionsAny self-insured retention must be declared to the City.

LICENSEE is responsible for satisfaction of the deductible and/or self-insured retention for each loss.

Page 1057 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
Umbrella/Excess Liability Policies
If an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy is used to meet the liability limits, coverage shall be as broad as specified for underlying coverages and cover those insured in the underlying policies.

Sublets
Sublicensees shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. Sublicensee(s) must furnish to the City for review and approval, separate certificates and endorsements.

LICENSEE agrees to defend and indemnify the City of Richmond for any damage resulting to it from failure of either LICENSEE or any sublicensee(s) to take out or maintain the required insurance policies. The fact that insurance is obtained by LICENSEE, and/or LICENSEE’s Sublicensees, will not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of LICENSEE, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this contract. Damages recoverable by CITY from LICENSEE or any third party will not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage.

Verification of Coverage
All original certificates and required endorsements shall be received by the City before LICENSEE may occupy the License Area. In the event that the City has tendered a claim to LICENSEE, or its insurer, or its insurer has denied coverage to the City, LICENSEE (in a local California office) will make available to the City within fifteen (15) days of the City’s written request to LICENSEE, a copy of actual, authentic and applicable insurance policies for review (but not for copying, faxing or otherwise reproducing any part of any policy or other insurance correspondence), subject to the City first executing LICENSEE's standard non-disclosure agreement. The policy review is limited to no more than three (3) days during a consecutive six (6) month period and must be conducted during LICENSEE’s normal business hours while the City’s representative is accompanied by a LICENSEE Risk Management professional. Upon completion of review no copies will be made and all policies will be returned to LICENSEE’s Corporate Risk Management Department.

Original insurance certificates and required policy endorsements shall be mailed or delivered to the Designated Project Manager for the City of Richmond.

Insurance certificates and required endorsements may be faxed to the Designated Project Manager. However, LICENSEE must mail the original certificates and required endorsements to Designated Project Manager once faxed.

Continuous Coverage
LICENSEE shall maintain the required insurance for the life of the License.

If LICENSEE’s use or occupancy of the License Area extends beyond the expiration dates of the required insurance policies initially approved by the City, LICENSEE must provide

Page 1058 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}
updated certificates and required endorsements indicating that the required coverage, terms and conditions are still in place. Renewal certificates and updated endorsements shall be mailed to the Designated Project Manager.

Cancellation
LICENSEE shall provide at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to the City of cancellation or nonrenewal of any required coverage that is not replaced.

Reporting Requirements
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

Consistent with Public Policy
The insuring provisions, insofar as they may be judged to be against public policy shall be void and unenforceable only to the minimum extent necessary so that the remaining terms and provisions herein may be consistent with public policy and thus enforceable.

Page 1059 of 1760 ends

{00063906;5}

EXHIBIT C

DEFAULT FEE SCHEDULE

DEFAULT FEE SCHEDULE

VIOLATION INITIAL NOTICE EACH FOLLOW-UP
NOTICE*
unauthorized installations $1,000 $1,500
failure to make required
repairs
$300 $350
access violations $300 $350
insurance violations $300 $350
*By mutual agreement, the City shall not issue a follow-up Default Fee notice to Licensee more than one (1) time in any consecutive thirty (30) day period, or until the expiration of the applicable cure period under the License, whichever date is later to occur.

Page 1060 of 1760 ends

Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-133
1 Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by
Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment
Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by
Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
WT Docket No. 17-79
WC Docket No. 17-84

DECLARATORY RULING AND THIRD REPORT AND ORDER
Adopted: September 26, 2018 Released: September 27, 2018 By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioners O’Rielly and Carr issuing separate statements; Commissioner Rosenworcel approving in part, dissenting in part and issuing a statement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Heading Paragraph #
I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND...................................................................................................................................14 A. Legal Background...........................................................................................................................14 B. The Need for Commission Action ..................................................................................................23 III. DECLARATORY RULING .................................................................................................................30 A. Overview of the Section 253 and Section 332(c)(7) Framework Relevant to Small Wireless Facilities Deployment ......................................................................................................34 B. State and Local Fees .......................................................................................................................43 C. Other State and Local Requirements that Govern Small Facilities Deployment............................81 D. States and Localities Act in Their Regulatory Capacities When Authorizing and Setting Terms for Wireless Infrastructure Deployment in Public Rights of Way.......................................92 E. Responses to Challenges to Our Interpretive Authority and Other Arguments..............................98 IV. THIRD REPORT AND ORDER ........................................................................................................103 A. New Shot Clocks for Small Wireless Facility Deployments........................................................104

1. Two New Section 332 Shot Clocks for Deployment of Small Wireless Facilities................105

2. Batched Applications for Small Wireless Facilities...............................................................113 B. New Remedy for Violations of the Small Wireless Facilities Shot Clocks..................................116 C. Clarification of Issues Related to All Section 332 Shot Clocks ...................................................132

1. Authorizations Subject to the “Reasonable Period of Time” Provision of Section 332(c)(7)(B)(ii).......................................................................................................................132

2. Codification of Section 332 Shot Clocks ...............................................................................138

3. Collocations on Structures Not Previously Zoned for Wireless Use .....................................140

4. When Shot Clocks Start and Incomplete Applications ..........................................................141 V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS...............................................................................................................148 VI. ORDERING CLAUSES......................................................................................................................151 APPENDIX A -- Final Rules
APPENDIX B -- Comments and Reply Comments
APPENDIX C -- Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
9088

Page 1061 of 1760 ends

Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-133
I. INTRODUCTION

1. America is in the midst of a transition to the next generation of wireless services, known as 5G. These new services can unleash a new wave of entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic opportunity for communities across the country. The FCC is committed to doing our part to help ensure the United States wins the global race to 5G to the benefit of all Americans. Today’s action is the next step in the FCC’s ongoing efforts to remove regulatory barriers that would unlawfully inhibit the deployment of infrastructure necessary to support these new services. We proceed by drawing on the balanced and commonsense ideas generated by many of our state and local partners in their own small cell bills.

2. Supporting the deployment of 5G and other next-generation wireless services through smart infrastructure policy is critical. Indeed, upgrading to these new services will, in many ways, represent a more fundamental change than the transition to prior generations of wireless service. 5G can enable increased competition for a range of services—including broadband—support new healthcare and Internet of Things applications, speed the transition to life-saving connected car technologies, and create jobs. It is estimated that wireless providers will invest $275 billion1 over the next decade in nextgeneration wireless infrastructure deployments, which should generate an expected three million new jobs and boost our nation’s GDP by half a trillion dollars.2 Moving quickly to enable this transition is important, as a new report forecasts that speeding 5G infrastructure deployment by even one year would unleash an additional $100 billion to the U.S. economy.3 Removing barriers can also ensure that every community gets a fair shot at these deployments and the opportunities they enable.

3. The challenge for policymakers is that the deployment of these new networks will look different than the 3G and 4G deployments of the past. Over the last few years, providers have been increasingly looking to densify their networks with new small cell deployments that have antennas often no larger than a small backpack. From a regulatory perspective, these raise different issues than the construction of large, 200-foot towers that marked the 3G and 4G deployments of the past. Indeed, estimates predict that upwards of 80 percent of all new deployments will be small cells going forward.4 To support advanced 4G or 5G offerings, providers must build out small cells at a faster pace and at a far greater density of deployment than before.

4. To date, regulatory obstacles have threatened the widespread deployment of these new services and, in turn, U.S. leadership in 5G. The FCC has lifted some of those barriers, including our decision in March 2018, which excluded small cells from some of the federal review procedures designed for those larger, 200-foot towers. But as the record here shows, the FCC must continue to act in partnership with our state and local leaders that are adopting forward leaning policies.

5. Many states and localities have acted to update and modernize their approaches to small cell deployments. They are working to promote deployment and balance the needs of their communities.

At the same time, the record shows that problems remain. In fact, many state and local officials have urged the FCC to continue our efforts in this proceeding and adopt additional reforms. Indeed, we have 1 See Accenture Strategy, Accelerating Future Economic Value from the Wireless Industry at 2 (2018) (Accelerating Future Economic Value Report), https://www.ctia.org/news/accelerating-future-economic-value-from-the-wirelessindustry, attached to Letter from Scott K. Bergmann, Senior Vice Pres., Reg. Affairs, CTIA to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 (filed July 19, 2018). 2 See Accenture Strategy, Smart Cities: How 5G Can Help Municipalities Become Vibrant Smart Cities, (2017) http://www.ctia.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/how-5g-can-help-municipalities-becomevibrantsmart-cities-accenture.pdf; attached to Letter from Scott Bergmann, Vice Pres. Reg. Affairs, CTIA to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 16-421, (filed Jan. 13, 2017). 3 Accelerating Future Economic Value Report at 2.
4 Letter from John T. Scott, Counsel for Mobilitie, LLC, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 17- 79 at 2-3 (filed Sept. 12, 2018).
9089

Page 1062 of 1760 ends

Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-133
heard from a number of local officials that the excessive fees or other costs associated with deploying small scale wireless infrastructure in large or otherwise “must serve” cities are materially inhibiting the buildout of wireless services in their own communities.

6. We thus find that now is the appropriate time to move forward with an approach geared at the conduct that threatens to limit the deployment of 5G services. In reaching our decision today, we have benefited from the input provided by a range of stakeholders, including state and local elected officials.5 FCC leadership spent substantial time over the course of this proceeding meeting directly with local elected officials in their jurisdictions. In light of those discussions and our consideration of the record here, we reach a decision today that does not preempt nearly any of the provisions passed in recent state-level small cell bills. We have reached a balanced, commonsense approach, rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all regime. This ensures that state and local elected officials will continue to play a key role in reviewing and promoting the deployment of wireless infrastructure in their communities.

7. Although many states and localities support our efforts, we acknowledge that there are others who advocated for different approaches.6 We have carefully considered these views, but nevertheless find our actions here necessary and fully supported. By building on state and local ideas, today’s action boosts the United States’ standing in the race to 5G. According to a study submitted by Corning, our action would eliminate around $2 billion in unnecessary costs, which would stimulate around $2.4 billion of additional buildouts.7 And that study shows that such new service would be 5 See, e.g., Letter from Brian D. Hill, Ohio State Representative, to the Hon. Brendan Carr, Commissioner, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 at 1-2 (filed Aug. 31, 2018) (“While the FCC and the Ohio Legislature have worked to reduce the timeline for 5G deployment, the same cannot be said for all local and state governments. Regulations written in a different era continue to dictate the regulatory process for 5G infrastructure”); Letter from Maureen Davey, Commissioner, Stillwater County, to the Hon. Brendan Carr, Commissioner, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 at 1-2 (filed Sept. 18, 2018) (“[T]he Commission’s actions to lower regulatory barriers can enable more capital spending to flow to areas like ours. Reducing fees and shortening review times in urban areas, thereby lowering the cost of deployment in such areas, can promote speedier deployment across all of America.”); Letter from Board of County Commissioners, Yellowstone County, to the Hon. Brendan Carr, Commissioner, FCC, WT Docket No. 17- 79 at 1-2 (filed Sept. 21, 2018) (“Reducing these regulatory barriers by setting guidelines on fees, siting requirements and review timeframes, will promote investment including rural areas like ours.”); Letter from Board of Commissioners, Harney County, Oregon, to the Hon. Brendan Carr, Commissioner, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 at 1-2 (filed Sept. 5, 2018) (“By taking action to speed and reduce the costs of deployment across the country, and create a more uniform regulatory framework, the Commission will lower the cost of deployment, enabling more investment in both urban and rural communities.”); Letter from Niraj J. Antani, Ohio State Representative, to the Hon. Brendan Carr, Commissioner, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 at 1-2 (filed Sept. 4, 2018) (“[T]o truly expedite the small cell deployment process, broader government action is needed on more than just the state level.”); Letter from Michael C. Taylor, Mayor, City of Sterling Heights, to the Hon. Brendan Carr, Commissioner, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 at 1-2 (filed Aug. 30, 2018) (“[T]here are significant, tangible benefits to having a nation-wide rule that promotes the deployment of next-generation wireless access without concern that excessive regulation or small cell siting fees slows down the process.”).
6 See, e.g., Letter from Linda Morse, Mayor, City of Manhattan, KS to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 at 1-2 (filed Sept. 13, 2018) (City of Manhattan, KS Sept. 13, 2018 Ex Parte Letter); Letter from Ronny Berdugo, Legislative Representative, League of California Cities to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 at 1-2 (filed Sept. 18, 2018) (Ronny Berdugo Sept. 18, 2018 Ex Parte Letter); Letter from Damon Connolly, Marin County Board of Supervisors to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 at 1-2 (filed Sept. 17, 2018) (Damon Connolly Sept. 17, 2018 Ex Parte Letter). 7 See Letter from Thomas J. Navin, Counsel to Corning, Inc., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 at 1, Attach. A at 2-3 (filed Sept. 5, 2018) (Corning Sept. 5, 2018 Ex Parte Letter). 9090

Page 1063 of 1760 ends

Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-133
deployed where it is needed most: 97 percent of new deployments would be in rural and suburban communities that otherwise would be on the wrong side of the digital divide.8

8. The FCC will keep pressing ahead to ensure that every community in the country gets a fair shot at the opportunity that next-generation wireless services can enable. As detailed in the sections that follow, we do so by taking the following steps.

9. In the Declaratory Ruling, we note that a number of appellate courts have articulated different and often conflicting views regarding the scope and nature of the limits Congress imposed on state and local governments through Sections 253 and 332. We thus address and reconcile this split in authorities by taking three main actions.

10. First, we express our agreement with the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Second, and Tenth Circuits that the “materially inhibit” standard articulated in 1997 by the Clinton-era FCC’s California Payphone decision is the appropriate standard for determining whether a state or local law operates as a prohibition or effective prohibition within the meaning of Sections 253 and 332.

11. Second, we note, as numerous courts and prior FCC cases have recognized, that state and local fees and other charges associated with the deployment of wireless infrastructure can unlawfully prohibit the provision of service. At the same time, courts have articulated various approaches to determining the types of fees that run afoul of Congress’s limits in Sections 253 and 332. We thus clarify the particular standard that governs the fees and charges that violate Sections 253 and 332 when it comes to the Small Wireless Facilities at issue in this decision.9 Namely, fees are only permitted to the extent that they are nondiscriminatory and represent a reasonable approximation of the locality’s reasonable costs. In this section, we also identify specific fee levels for the deployment of Small Wireless Facilities that presumptively comply with this standard. We do so to help avoid unnecessary litigation over fees.

12. Third, we focus on a subset of other, non-fee provisions of local law that could also operate as prohibitions on service. We do so in particular by addressing state and local consideration of aesthetic concerns in the deployment of Small Wireless Facilities, recognizing that certain reasonable aesthetic considerations do not run afoul of Sections 253 and 332. This responds in particular to many concerns we heard from state and local governments about deployments in historic districts. 8 Id.
9 “Small Wireless Facilities,” as used herein and consistent with section 1.1312(e)(2), encompasses facilities that meet the following conditions:
(1) The facilities—
(i) are mounted on structures 50 feet or less in height including their antennas as defined in section

1.1320(d), or
(ii) are mounted on structures no more than 10 percent taller than other adjacent structures, or (iii) do not extend existing structures on which they are located to a height of more than 50 feet or by more than 10 percent, whichever is greater;
(2) Each antenna associated with the deployment, excluding associated antenna equipment (as defined in the definition of antenna in section 1.1320(d)), is no more than three cubic feet in volume; (3) All other wireless equipment associated with the structure, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre-existing associated equipment on the structure, is no more than 28 cubic feet in volume;
(4) The facilities do not require antenna structure registration under part 17 of this chapter; (5) The facilities are not located on Tribal lands, as defined under 36 CFR 800.16(x); and (6) The facilities do not result in human exposure to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the applicable safety standards specified in section 1.1307(b). 9091

Page 1064 of 1760 ends

Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-133

13. Next, we issue a Report and Order that addresses the “shot clocks” governing the review of wireless infrastructure deployments. We take three main steps in this regard. First, we create a new set of shot clocks tailored to support the deployment of Small Wireless Facilities. In particular, we read Sections 253 and 332 as allowing 60 days for reviewing the application for attachment of a Small Wireless Facility using an existing structure and 90 days for the review of an application for attachment of a small wireless facility using a new structure. Second, while we do not adopt a “deemed granted” remedy for violations of our new shot clocks, we clarify that failing to issue a decision up or down during this time period is not simply a “failure to act” within the meaning of applicable law. Rather, missing the deadline also constitutes a presumptive prohibition. We would thus expect any locality that misses the deadline to issue any necessary permits or authorizations without further delay. We also anticipate that a provider would have a strong case for quickly obtaining an injunction from a court that compels the issuance of all permits in these types of cases. Third, we clarify a number of issues that are relevant to all of the FCC’s shot clocks, including the types of authorizations subject to these time periods.

II. BACKGROUND
A. Legal Background

14. In the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the 1996 Act), Congress enacted sweeping new provisions intended to facilitate the deployment of telecommunications infrastructure. As U.S. Courts of Appeals have stated, “[t]he [1996] Act ‘represents a dramatic shift in the nature of telecommunications regulation.’”10 The Senate floor manager, Senator Larry Pressler, stated that “[t]his is the most comprehensive deregulation of the telecommunications industry in history.”11 Indeed, the purpose of the 1996 Act is to “provide for a pro-competitive, deregulatory national policy framework . . . by opening all telecommunications markets to competition.”12 The conference report on the 1996 Act similarly indicates that Congress “intended to remove all barriers to entry in the provision of telecommunications services.”13 The 1996 Act thus makes clear Congress’s commitment to a competitive telecommunications marketplace unhindered by unnecessary regulations, explicitly directing the FCC to “promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices and higher quality services for American telecommunications consumers and encourage the rapid deployment of new telecommunications technologies.”14

15. Several provisions of the 1996 Act speak directly to Congress’s determination that certain state and local regulations are unlawful. Section 253(a) provides that “[n]o State or local statute or regulation, or other State or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service.”15 Courts have observed that Section 253 represents a “broad preemption of laws that inhibit competition.”16

16. The Commission has issued several rulings interpreting and providing guidance regarding the language Congress used in Section 253. For instance, in the 1997 California Payphone decision, the Commission, under the leadership of then Chairman William Kennard, stated that, in determining whether a state or local law has the effect of prohibiting the provision of telecommunications services, it 10 Sprint Telephony PCS LP v. County of San Diego, 543 F.3d 571, 575 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc) (County of San Diego) (quoting Cablevision of Boston, Inc. v. Pub. Improvement Comm’n, 184 F.3d 88, 97 (1st Cir. 1999)). 11 141 Cong. Rec. S8197 (daily ed. June 12, 1995).
12 H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104–458, at 113 (1996), reprinted in 1996 U.S.C.C.A.N. (100 Stat. 5) 124. 13 S. Rep. No. 104-230, at 126 (1996) (Conf. Rep.).
14 Preamble, Telecommunications Act of 1996, P.L. 104-104, 100 Stat. 56 (1996); see also AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 525 U.S. 366, 371 (1999) (noting that the 1996 Act “fundamentally restructures local telephone markets” to facilitate market entry); Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844, 857-58 (1997) (“The Telecommunications Act was an unusually important legislative enactment . . . designed to promote competition.”). 15 47 U.S.C. § 253(a).
16 Puerto Rico Tel. Co. v. Telecomm. Reg. Bd. of Puerto Rico, 189 F.3d 1, 11 n.7 (1st Cir. 1999). 9092

Page 1065 of 1760 ends

Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-133
“consider[s] whether the ordinance materially inhibits or limits the ability of any competitor or potential competitor to compete in a fair and balanced legal and regulatory environment.”17

17. Similar to Section 253, Congress specified in Section 332(c)(7) that “[t]he regulation of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities by any State or local government or instrumentality thereof—(I) shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services; and (II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.”18 Clause (B)(ii) of that section further provides that “[a] State or local government or instrumentality thereof shall act on any request for authorization to place, construct, or modify personal wireless service facilities within a reasonable period of time after the request is duly filed with such government or instrumentality, taking into account the nature and scope of such request.”19 Section 332(c)(7) generally preserves state and local authority over the “placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities” but with the important limitations described above.20 Section 332(c)(7) also sets forth a judicial remedy, stating that “[a]ny person adversely affected by any final action or failure to act by a State or local government” that is inconsistent with the requirements of Section 332(c)(7) “may, within 30 days after such action or failure to act, commence an action in any court of competent jurisdiction.”21 The provision further directs the court to “decide such action on an expedited basis.”22

18. The Commission has previously interpreted the language Congress used and the limits it imposed on state and local authority in Section 332. For instance, in interpreting Section 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II), the Commission has found that “a State or local government that denies an application for personal wireless service facilities siting solely because ‘one or more carriers serve a given geographic market’ has engaged in unlawful regulation that ‘prohibits or ha[s] the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services,’ within the meaning of Section 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II).”23 In adopting this interpretation, the Commission explained that its “construction of the provision achieves a balance that is most consistent with the relevant goals of the Communications Act” and its understanding that “[i]n promoting the construction of nationwide wireless networks by multiple carriers, Congress sought ultimately to improve service quality and lower prices for consumers.”24 The Commission also noted that an alternative interpretation would “diminish the service provided to [a wireless provider’s] customers.”25 17 California Payphone Ass’n, 12 FCC Rcd 14191, 14206, para. 31 (1997) (California Payphone). 18 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(i).
19 47 U.S.C § 332(c)(7)(B)(ii).
20 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(A) (stating that, “[e]xcept as provided in this paragraph, nothing in this chapter shall limit or affect the authority of a State or local government or instrumentality thereof over decisions regarding the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless services facilities”). The statute defines “personal wireless services” to include CMRS, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(C). In 2012, Congress expressly modified this preservation of local authority by enacting Section 6409(a), which requires local governments to approve certain types of facilities siting applications “[n]otwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 [codified in substantial part as Section 332(c)(7)] . . . or any other provision of law.” Spectrum Act, 47 U.S.C. § 6409(a)(1). 21 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(v).
22 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(v).
23 Petition for Declaratory Ruling to Clarify Provisions of Section 332(c)(7) to Ensure Timely Siting Review, Declaratory Ruling, 24 FCC Rcd 13994, 14016, para. 56 (2009) (2009 Declaratory Ruling), aff’d, City of Arlington v. FCC, 668 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2012) (City of Arlington), aff’d, 569 U.S. 290 (2013). 24 2009 Declaratory Ruling, 24 RCC Rcd at 14017-18, para. 61. 25 Id.
9093

Page 1066 of 1760 ends

Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-133

19. In the 2009 Declaratory Ruling, the Commission acted to speed the deployment of thennew 4G services and concluded that, “[g]iven the evidence of unreasonable delays [in siting decisions] and the public interest in avoiding such delays,” it should offer guidance regarding the meaning of the statutory phrases “reasonable period of time” and “failure to act” “in order to clarify when an adversely affected service provider may take a dilatory State or local government to court.”26 The Commission interpreted “reasonable period of time” under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(ii) to be 90 days for processing collocation applications and 150 days for processing applications other than collocations. 27 The Commission further determined that failure to meet the applicable time frame enables an applicant to pursue judicial relief within the next 30 days.28 In litigation involving the 90-day and 150-day time frames, the locality may attempt to “rebut the presumption that the established timeframes are reasonable.”29 If the agency fails to make such a showing, it may face “issuance of an injunction granting the application.”30 In its 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, 31 the Commission clarified that the time
frames under Section 332(c)(7) are presumptively reasonable and begin to run when the application is submitted, not when it is found to be complete by a siting authority.32

20. In 2012, Congress adopted Section 6409 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act (the Spectrum Act), which provides further evidence of Congressional intent to limit state and local laws that operate as barriers to infrastructure deployment. It states that, “[n]otwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 [codified as 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)] or any other provision of law, a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station.”33 Subsection (a)(2) defines the term “eligible facilities request” as any request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that involves (a) collocation of new transmission equipment; (b) removal of transmission equipment; or (c) replacement of transmission equipment.34 In implementing Section 6409 and in an effort to “advance[e] Congress’s goal 26 Id. at 14008, para. 37; see also id. at 14029 (Statement of Chairman Julius Genachowski) (“[T]he rules we adopt today . . . will have an important effect in speeding up wireless carriers’ ability to build new 4G networks--which will in turn expand and improve the range of wireless choices available to American consumers.”). 27 Id. at 14012, para. 45.
28 Id. at 14005, 14012, paras. 32, 45.
29 Id. at 14008-10, 14013-14, paras. 37-42, 49-50.
30 Id. at 14009, para. 38; see also City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams, 544 U.S. 113, 115 (2005) (proper remedies for Section 332(c)(7) violations include injunctions but not constitutional tort damages). 31 Specifically, the Commission determined that once a siting application is considered complete for purposes of triggering the Section 332(c)(7) shot clocks, those shot clocks run regardless of any moratoria imposed by state or local governments, and the shot clocks apply to DAS and small-cell deployments so long as they are or will be used to provide “personal wireless services.” Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies, Report & Order, 29 FCC Rcd 12865, 12966, 12973, paras. 243, 270, (2014) (2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order), aff’d, Montgomery County v. FCC, 811 F.3d 121 (4th Cir. 2015) (Montgomery County); see also Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry, 32 FCC Rcd 3330, 3339, para. 22 (2017) (Wireless Infrastructure NPRM/NOI); Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, Third Report and Order and Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No. 17-84 and WT Docket No. 17-79, FCC 18-111, paras. 140-68 (rel. Aug. 3, 2018) (Moratoria Declaratory Ruling). 32 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, 29 FCC Rcd at 12970, para. 258. (“Accordingly, to the extent municipalities have interpreted the clock to begin running only after a determination of completeness, that interpretation is incorrect.”).
33 Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-96 § 6409(a)(2), 126 Stat. 156 (2012). 34 Id.
9094

Page 1067 of 1760 ends

Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-133
of facilitating rapid deployment,”35 the Commission adopted rules to expedite the processing of eligible facilities requests, including documentation requirements and a 60-day period for states and localities to review such requests.36 The Commission further determined that a “deemed granted” remedy was necessary for cases in which the reviewing authority fails to issue a decision within the 60-day period in order to “ensur[e] rapid deployment of commercial and public safety wireless broadband services.”37 The Fourth Circuit, affirming that remedy, explained that “[f]unctionally, what has occurred here is that the FCC—pursuant to properly delegated Congressional authority—has preempted state regulation of wireless towers.”38

21. Consistent with these broad federal mandates, courts have recognized that the Commission has authority to interpret Sections 253 and 332 of the Act to further elucidate what types of state and local legal requirements run afoul of the statutory parameters Congress established.39 For instance, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the 2009 Declaratory Ruling in City of Arlington. The court concluded that the Commission possessed the “authority to establish the 90– and 150–day time frames” and that its decision was not arbitrary and capricious.40 More generally, as the agency charged with administering the Communications Act, the Commission has the authority, responsibility, and expert judgement to issue interpretations of the statutory language and to adopt implementing regulations that clarify and specify the scope and effect of the Act. Such interpretations are particularly appropriate where the statutory language is ambiguous, or the subject matter is “technical, complex, and dynamic,” as it is in the Communications Act, as recognized by the Supreme Court.41 Here, the Commission has ample experience monitoring and regulating the telecommunications sector. It is well-positioned, in light of this experience and the record in this proceeding, to issue a clarifying interpretation of Sections 253 and 332(c)(7) that accounts both for the changing needs of a dynamic wireless sector that is increasingly reliant on Small Wireless Facilities and for state and local oversight that does not materially inhibit wireless deployment.

22. The congressional and FCC decisions described above point to consistent federal action, particularly when faced with changes in technology, to ensure that our country’s approach to wireless infrastructure deployment promotes buildout of the facilities needed to provide Americans with nextgeneration services. Consistent with that long-standing approach, in the 2017 Wireless Infrastructure NPRM/NOI, the Commission sought comment on whether the FCC should again update its approach to infrastructure deployment to ensure that regulations are not operating as prohibitions in violation of Congress’s decisions and federal policy.42 In August 2018, the Commission concluded that state and local moratoria on telecommunications services and facilities deployment are barred by Section 253(a).43 35 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, 29 FCC Rcd at 12872, para. 15. 36 Id. at 12922, 12956-57, paras. 135, 214-15.
37 Id. at 12961-62, paras. 226, 228.
38 Montgomery County, 811 F.3d at 129.
39 See, e.g., City of Arlington, 668 F.3d at 253-54; County of San Diego, 543 F.3d at 578; RT Commc’ns., Inc. v.

FCC, 201 F.3d 1264, 1268 (10th Cir. 2000).
40 City of Arlington, 668 F.3d at 254, 260-61.
41 Nat’l Cable & Telecomm. Ass’n v. Gulf Power Co., 534 U.S. 327, 328 (2002); FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000) (recognizing “agency’s greater familiarity with the ever-changing facts and circumstances surrounding the subjects regulated”); see also, e.g., Nat’l Cable & Telecomm. Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. 967, 983-986 (2005) (Commission’s interpretation of an ambiguous statutory provision overrides earlier court decisions interpreting the same provision). 42 See generally Wireless Infrastructure NPRM/NOI, 32 FCC Rcd at 3332-39, paras. 4-22. 43 See generally Moratoria Declaratory Ruling, FCC 18-111, paras. 140-68. 9095

Page 1068 of 1760 ends

Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-133
B. The Need for Commission Action

23. In response to the opportunities presented by offering new wireless services, and the problems facing providers that seek to deploy networks to do so, we find it necessary and appropriate to exercise our authority to interpret the Act and clarify the preemptive scope that Congress intended. The introduction of advanced wireless services has already revolutionized the way Americans communicate and transformed the U.S. economy. Indeed, the FCC’s most recent wireless competition report indicates that American demand for wireless services continues to grow exponentially. It has been reported that monthly data usage per smartphone subscriber rose to an average of 3.9 gigabytes per subscriber per month, an increase of approximately 39 percent from year-end 2015 to year-end 2016.44 As more Americans use more wireless services, demand for new technologies, coverage and capacity will necessarily increase, making it critical that the deployment of wireless infrastructure, particularly Small Wireless Facilities, not be stymied by unreasonable state and local requirements.

24. 5G wireless services, in particular, will transform the U.S. economy through increased use of high-bandwidth and low-latency applications and through the growth of the Internet of Things.45 While the existing wireless infrastructure in the U.S. was erected primarily using macro cells with relatively large antennas and towers, wireless networks increasingly have required the deployment of small cell systems to support increased usage and capacity. We expect this trend to increase with nextgeneration networks, as demand continues to grow, and providers deploy 5G service across the nation.46

It is precisely “[b]ecause providers will need to deploy large numbers of wireless cell sites to meet the country’s wireless broadband needs and implement next-generation technologies” that the Commission has acknowledged “an urgent need to remove any unnecessary barriers to such deployment, whether caused by Federal law, Commission processes, local and State reviews, or otherwise.”47 As explained below, the need to site so many more 5G-capable nodes leaves providers’ deployment plans and the underlying economics of those plans vulnerable to increased per site delays and costs.

25. Some states and local governments have acted to facilitate the deployment of 5G and other next-gen infrastructure, looking to bring greater connectivity to their communities through forwardlooking policies. Leaders in these states are working hard to meet the needs of their communities and balance often competing interests. At the same time, outlier conduct persists. The record here suggests that the legal requirements in place in other state and local jurisdictions are materially impeding that deployment in various ways.48 Crown Castle, for example, describes “excessive and unreasonable” “fees 44 See Implementation of Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions with Respect to Mobile Wireless, Including Commercial Mobile Services, Twentieth Report, 32 FCC Rcd 8968, 8972, para. 20 (2017) (Twentieth Wireless Competition Report). 45 See Wireless Infrastructure NPRM/NOI, 32 FCC Rcd at 3331, para. 1. 46 See, e.g., Letter from Brett Haan, Principal, Deloitte Consulting, U.S., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79 at 2 (filed Sept. 17, 2018) (“Significant investment in new network infrastructure is needed to deploy 5G networks at-scale in the United States. 5G’s speed and coverage capabilities rely on network densification, which requires the addition of towers and small cells to the network. . . . This requires carriers to add 3 to 10 times the number of existing sites to their networks. Most of this additional infrastructure will likely be built with small cells that use lampposts, utility phones, or other structures of similar size able to host smaller, less obtrusive radios required to build a densified network.” (citation omitted)); see also Deloitte LLP, 5G: The Chance to Lead for a Decade (2018) (Deloitte 5G Paper), available at https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/technology-media-telecommunications/us-tmt5gdeployment-imperative.pdf. 47 See Wireless Infrastructure NPRM/NOI, 32 FCC Rcd at 3331, para. 2. 48 See, e.g., Letter from Henry Hultquist, AT&T, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79, at 1 (filed Aug. 10, 2018) (“Unfortunately, many municipalities are unable, unwilling, or do not make it a priority to act on applications within the shot clock period.” ); Letter from Keith Buell, Sprint, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79, at 1-2 (filed Aug. 13, 2018) (Sprint Aug. 13, 2018 Ex Parte Letter); Letter from Katherine R. Saunders, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 17-79, at 2 (filed June 21, 9096

Page 1069 of 1760 ends
← All documents from this meeting