Agenda — Richmond City Council, May 17, 2022 (part 9 of 9)

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 24 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
scale/height of development and associated depth of construction and overall construction activities would be the same or reduced relative to the Original Project analyzed in the 2018 EIR.

The Modified Project would implement Mitigation Measures CUL-1: Preconstruction Training, Cultural Resources Monitoring, and Inadvertent Discovery of Cultural Resources; CUL-2: Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains; and CUL-3: Preconstruction Training, Paleontological Monitoring, and Accidental Discovery of Paleontological Resources to reduce potential impacts to cultural resources to a less-than-significant level.

Cumulative
As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to cumulative effects on cultural resources would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

Preconstruction Training, Cultural Resources Monitoring, and Inadvertent Discovery of Cultural Resources; CUL-2: Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains; and CUL-3:

Preconstruction Training, Paleontological Monitoring, and Accidental Discovery of Paleontological Resources would be applicable to and would be implemented by the Modified Project and would ensure that impacts on cultural resources would be less than significant. No revisions are required to the 2018 EIR analysis of the Original Project to address potential cultural resources impacts of the Modified Project.

Mitigation Measures
The following mitigation measures from the 2018 EIR will apply to the Modified Project to address significant cultural and paleontological resources impacts.

Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Preconstruction Training, Cultural Resources Monitoring, and Inadvertent Discovery of Cultural Resources.
a. Archeological Site CA-CCO-400: Preconstruction Training and Cultural Resources Monitoring. Prior to authorization to proceed, a Secretary of the Interior-qualified archaeologist shall prepare a cultural resources monitoring plan. The City of Richmond shall review and approve the plan. The plan shall include a requirement for monitoring of construction activities within 200 feet of archeological site CA-CCO-400 by both a qualified archeologist and, if reasonably available, a Native American representative. The City shall conduct good faith outreach (phone calls and emails) to tribal representatives identified by the Native American Heritage Commission in their February 6, 2016 letter as having potential interest in the Project site (see Appendix D of the Draft EIR). The plan shall include (but not be limited to) the following components:
 A training program for all construction and field workers involved in site disturbance that would be completed prior to the commencement of construction activities and that would train site workers in the identification of potential cultural resources, and actions to be undertaken in the event that potential cultural resources are discovered;

Page 1589 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 25 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
 The identification of person(s) responsible for conducting monitoring activities, including Native American monitors;
 The identification of person(s) responsible for overseeing and directing the monitors;  Monitoring protocols and procedures and the required format and content of monitoring reports;  The schedule for submittal of monitoring reports and identification of person(s) responsible for review and approval of monitoring reports;
 A protocol for notifications in the event cultural resources are encountered, as well as methods of dealing with the encountered resources (e.g., collection, identification, curation);  Methods to ensure the security of cultural resources sites; and  A protocol for notifying local authorities (i.e. Sheriff, Police) should site looting and other illegal activities occur during construction.

During the course of the construction monitoring, the archaeologist may adjust the frequency, from continuous to intermittent, of the monitoring based on the conditions and professional judgment regarding the potential to impact resources.
b. Project Site-Wide (Including Archeological Site CA-CCO-400): Inadvertent Discovery of Cultural Resources.

If archaeological resources are encountered during Project construction, including in the vicinity of archeological site CA-CCO-400, the following steps shall be undertaken:
 All soil disturbing activities within 100 feet in all directions of the find shall cease until the resource is evaluated;
 The monitor shall immediately notify the City of Richmond of the encountered archaeological resource;  The monitor shall, after making a reasonable effort to assess the identity, integrity, and significance of the encountered archaeological resource, present the findings of this assessment to the City; and  A Secretary of the Interior-qualified archaeologist shall inspect the find within 24 hours of discovery.

Prehistoric archaeological materials might include obsidian and chert flaked-stone tools (e.g., projectile points, knives, scrapers) or toolmaking debris; culturally darkened soil (“midden”) containing heat-affected rocks, artifacts, or shellfish remains; and stone milling equipment (e.g., mortars, pestles, handstones, or milling slabs); and battered stone tools, such as hammerstones and pitted stones. Historic-period materials might include stone, concrete, or adobe footings and walls; filled wells or privies; and deposits of metal, glass, and/or ceramic refuse.

In the event archaeological resources qualifying as either historical resources pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 or as unique archaeological resources as defined by Public Resources Code 21083.2 are encountered, mitigation shall be implemented in accordance with PRC Section 21083.2 and Section 15126.4 of the CEQA Guidelines, with a preference for preservation in place. The archaeologist, in consultation with the City of Richmond and the culturally-affiliated Native American group(s) shall determine whether to pursue preservation in place. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)(3), this may be accomplished through planning construction to avoid the resource; incorporating the resource within open space; capping and covering the resource; or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement.

If preservation in place is not pursued, the City of Richmond shall ensure implementation of a detailed Archaeological Research Design and Treatment Plan (ARDTP), in consultation with the affiliated Native American tribe(s), if applicable. A qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the City of Richmond, shall prepare and implement the ARDTP, which shall include a data recovery program. The Project archaeologist, the applicant, and the City of Richmond shall meet to determine the scope of the ARDTP. Treatment of unique archaeological resources shall follow the applicable requirements of PRC Section 21083.2. The ARDTP shall identify how the proposed data recovery program would preserve the significant information the archaeological resource contains, and shall include and/or require the following:
 Identification of the scientific/historic research questions applicable to the expected resource, the data classes the resource is expected to possess, and how the expected data classes would address the applicable research questions;
 Documentation of the results of the investigation in a timely manner, in a technical report that provides a full artifact catalog, analysis of items collected, results of any special studies conducted, and interpretations of the resource within a regional and local context;
 Details regarding treatment, which for most resources would consist of (but would not be not limited to)

Page 1590 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 26 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
sample excavation, artifact collection, site documentation, and historical research, with the aim to target the recovery of important scientific data contained in the portion(s) of the significant resource to be impacted by the Project;
 Dissemination of report/s to local and state repositories, libraries, and interested professionals; and  Curation of artifacts and data at an approved facility.

The City of Richmond shall submit all technical documents to the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System.

Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains. Prior to the commencement of Project construction, the applicant shall ensure that Project construction personnel receive training regarding the possibility of encountering human remains during construction, and apprised of appropriate procedures to undertake in the event of such a discovery. Pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California, in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains during construction activities, such activities within 100 feet of the find shall cease until the Contra Costa County Coroner has been contacted to determine that no investigation of the cause of death is required. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) will be contacted within 24 hours if it is determined that the remains are Native American. The NAHC will then identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descendant from the deceased Native American, who in turn would make recommendations to the City of Richmond for the appropriate means of treating the human remains and any grave goods.

Mitigation Measure CUL-3: Preconstruction Training, Paleontological Monitoring, and Accidental Discovery of Paleontological Resources. Prior to construction, a qualified paleontologist with expertise in California paleontology will develop a paleontological resources training program for all construction and field workers involved in ground-disturbing activities that details the recognition and importance of paleontological resources, and establishes accidental discovery procedures should paleontological resources be encountered during construction.

Paleontological monitoring is necessary when ground-disturbing activities occur in previously undisturbed sediments mapped as Franciscan sandstone or greywacke (see Engeo Inc., 2017 for detailed geologic mapping of the Project site). Monitoring is not necessary in other sediments on the Project site, including artificial fill, colluvium, or landslide deposits, or in areas that have been previously disturbed. Monitoring should be conducted by a qualified paleontological monitor that meets the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP; 2010).

If paleontological resources, such as fossilized bone, teeth, shell, tracks, trails, casts, molds, or impressions are discovered during ground-disturbing activities, work shall stop in that area and within 100 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can assess the nature and importance of the find and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in conformance with SVP standards, and in consultation with the City of Richmond.

Page 1591 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 27 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.6 Energy

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED ORIGINAL PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE
2018 QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact ENE-1: Construction and operation of the Project would not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans, violate energy standards, or result in wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary use of energy, and the Project would not require substantial additional capacity. (Criteria a. through d.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact C-ENE-1: The proposed Project, in conjunction with other past, current, or foreseeable development in Richmond, would not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans, violate energy standards, or result in wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary use of energy, such that a cumulative impact would occur. (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
These impacts are addressed in detail on page 4.5-17 through 4.5-26 of the Draft EIR.

The 2018 EIR determined that construction and operation of the Original Project would result in less-than-significant energy impacts. The Original Project would be subject to applicable standards and policies aimed to reduce energy consumption including the City’s CAP, the State’s Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards, CALGreen standards, and General Plan 2030 policies. The Original Project’s construction and operation would result in energy consumption typical for a new project of its size. The energy demand from the construction and operation of the Original Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary use of energy, and would not require substantial additional capacity. This impact would be less than significant.

The Modified Project would be developed within the same 6.3-acre Project development area requiring the same or reduced level of construction-related activity. Modified Project construction and operation would be subject to the same or updated standards and policies mentioned above.

In particular, since certification of the 2018 EIR, the City adopted its Energy Reach Code, which embodies amendments to, and exceeds the 2019 California Energy Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6). The Energy Code implements strategy measures identified in the Richmond CAP that require electricity, instead of natural gas, as the sole fuel source for newly constructed buildings in Richmond as of June 10, 2020. Implementation of these strategies were needed for the City to reach its adopted climate and health co-benefit goals by 2050. Relevant to the Modified Project, the Energy Reach Code requires that newly constructed residential buildings be all-electric, except for cooking appliances and fireplaces. Also, on January 1, 2022, the City’s adopted Natural Gas Ban Code was enacted (Richmond Municipal Code new Chapter

9.64) that would ban natural gas infrastructure in newly constructed buildings, reducing energy consumption. Further, energy consumption, including mobile fuel use from project-generated traffic, would be reduced relative to the Original Project analyzed in the 2018 EIR. Therefore, the energy demand from the construction and operation of the Modified Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary use of energy, as was determined in the 2018 EIR.

Cumulative
As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to

Page 1592 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 28 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
cumulative effects related to energy consumption would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures were identified in the 2018 EIR to address energy impacts.

Page 1593 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 29 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.7 Geology, Soils and Mineral Resources

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED ORIGINAL PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE
2018 QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact GEO-1: Development of the Project could expose people or structures to seismically induced ground shaking and thereby to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death. (Criterion a.2) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact GEO-2: Project development could expose people or structures to seismically related ground failure including liquefaction and thereby expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death. (Criterion a.3) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact GEO-3: Project development could expose people or structures to landslides or slope failure on the Project site thereby exposing people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death. (Criterion a.4) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact GEO-4: The Project could result in soil erosion during excavation, grading, and construction activities. (Criterion b.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact GEO-5: The Project could result in on- or off-site lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse from placement of improvements on unstable geologic units or soils. (Criterion c.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact GEO-6: Project implementation could occur on expansive soils, creating substantial risks to life and property. (Criterion d.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact GEO-7: The proposed Project could result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State, or locally. (Criteria f. and g.). (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact C-GEO-1: The Project, in conjunction with past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not result in significant cumulative impacts with respect to geology, soils, seismicity, or mineral resources. (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) These impacts are addressed in detail on pages 4.6-18 through 4.6-28 of the Draft EIR.

The 2018 EIR determined that construction and operation of the Original Project would result in less-than-significant impacts regarding geology, soils and mineral resources. The Original Project would be subject to final project-specific design-level geotechnical recommendations in accordance with the current seismic design criteria required under the California Building Code (CBC). Adherence to standard industry practices and geotechnical recommendations contained in the final approved report would reduce the potential impacts associated with ground shaking during a major seismic event; seismically-related ground failure, including liquefaction; slope instability and slope failure; unstable geologic units; and expansive soils to a less than significant level. Implementation of the Original Project’s Erosion Control Plan and required BMPs as part of the NPDES Construction General Permit would reduce impacts associated with erosion to a less than significant level. Finally, the 2018 EIR determined the Original Project would have a less-than-significant impact on mineral resources.

No aspect of the proposed project would change the conditions or environmental impacts regarding geology, soils and mineral resources identified for the Original Project in the 2018 EIR.

As previously described, the Modified Project would be developed within the same Project development area, with the same geologic characteristics and seismic hazards analyzed in the 2018 EIR. The ground disturbance area would be the same as considered in the 2018 EIR.

Page 1594 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 30 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
Further, the scale/height of development and associated depth of construction and overall construction activities would be the same or reduced relative to the Original Project analyzed in the 2018 EIR.

A preliminary geotechnical investigation determined that the Original Project was feasible with implementation of specific geotechnical recommendations. A final design-level geotechnical investigation would be performed for the Modified Project and Project site in accordance with standard industry practices and code requirements. The Project-specific geotechnical recommendations and design parameters for earthwork, retaining walls, foundations, foundation slabs, and any surrounding related improvements, utilities, roadways, parking lots, and sidewalks would be revised to accommodate the Modified Project’s reduced height and scale. Like the Original Project, the final Project-specific geotechnical recommendations would be reviewed and approved by a California registered geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist and the City.

The Modified Project’s proposed building height and scale would be reduced compared with the Original Project. The revised design would still be subject to the current industry standard geotechnical practices and seismic structural design according to the requirements found in the most recent version of the CBC, which would mitigate all seismic hazards discussed in the 2018 EIR. Implementation of the final geotechnical recommendations and conformance with the current seismic design provisions of the CBC would reduce potential impacts related to exposure to ground shaking, ground failure including liquefaction, slope failure, and unstable geologic units or materials to a less-than-significant level. Further, implementation of the Erosion Control Plan and required BMPs as part of the NPDES Construction General Permit would minimize erosion impacts during construction and reduce potential impacts to less–than-significant levels.

Cumulative
As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to cumulative effects related to geology, soils, and mineral resources would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures were identified in the 2018 EIR to address geology, soils, and mineral resources impacts.

Page 1595 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 31 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.8 Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED ORIGINAL PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE
2018 QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact GHG-1: Development of the proposed Project would produce GHG emissions that could have a significant impact on the environment. (Criterion a.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact GHG-2: Development of the Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation of an appropriate regulatory agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. (Criterion b.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact C-GHG-1: Development of the Project, combined with cumulative development, including past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future development in the vicinity of the Project site, would result in cumulative impacts regarding GHG emissions and climate change. (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
These impacts are addressed in detail on pages 4.7-25 through 4.7-35 of the Draft EIR.

Evaluation of Construction and Operational GHG Emissions of the Modified Project
The analysis in the 2018 EIR (Impact GHG-1) found that under the Original Project, construction and operation of 200 multi-family units would result in increased GHG emissions below the applicable thresholds of significance of the BAAQMD. Additionally, the emissions from the Original Project would represent more than a 15 percent reduction when compared to a business as usual scenario, consistent with the City of Richmond’s Climate Action Plan and, therefore, a less than significant impact. The Modified Project would only construct 76 single-family residences and the vehicle trip generation and other area sources would be reduced compared to the Original Project analyzed in the 2018 EIR. Vehicle trip generation would be reduced by 41 percent. Additionally, construction-related GHG emissions would be similar to or reduced compared to the Original Project because the level of construction intensity and its related emissions would be reduced compared to the Project analyzed in the 2018 EIR.

The CalEEMod model (version 2020.4.0) indicates that operational GHG emissions under the Modified Project would be 44 percent less than that of the Project analyzed in the 2018 EIR.

GHG emissions under the Modified Project would be below the BAAQMD screening threshold of 1,100 metric tons per year. Therefore, the Modified Project would also have a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions.

While the BAAQMD GHG thresholds were developed to address the year 2020 reduction targets of the original State of California Scoping Plan, more aggressive targets for year 2030 have been adopted by the 2017 Update to the Scoping Plan. The 2017 Scoping Plan Update outlines the proposed framework of action for achieving the 2030 GHG target of 40 percent reduction in GHG emissions relative to 1990 levels (CARB, 2017), which is a further 40 percent reduction beyond the year 2020 targets. As indicated in the 2018 EIR, the Original Project would be consistent with BAAQMD thresholds developed for year 2020 reduction targets. As the Modified Project’s GHG emissions would be 45 percent less than the Original Project, the Modified Project would be considered consistent with the year 2030 as well as the year 2020 reduction targets.

Page 1596 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 32 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
Therefore, the impact of the Modified Project with respect to GHG emissions that could have a significant impact on the environment would be less than significant.

TABLE 4-2

ESTIMATED GHG EMISSIONS GENERATED BY THE MODIFIED PROJECT Emission Source
Total Emissions (MT/Year)
CO2 CH4 N2O Total CO2e
Area Sources 0.99 <0.01 0.00 0.99
Energy Sources 223.08 0.01 <0.01 224.64
Mobile Sources 596.56 0.04 0.03 606.15
Solid Waste 19.01 1.12 0.00 47.10
Water and Wastewater 5.33 0.17 <0.00 10.80
Total Modified Project
Total Original Project
844.95
1,562.81

1.35 1.19

0.04 0.01
889.69
1,596.90
Project-level Screening Threshold 1,100
Modified Project Exceeds Significance Threshold? No
Modified Project Service Population 212
Total Modified Project GHG Emissions by Service Population 4.2 Project-level Service Population Threshold 4.6
Modified Project Exceeds Significance Threshold? No
NOTE: Columns may not total precisely due to rounding, and due to the influence of minimal amounts of less common GHGs not represented in the table.

SOURCE: ESA, 2021
Evaluation of the Modified Project’s Consistency with Plans to Reduce GHG Emissions
The analysis in the 2018 EIR (Impact GHG-2) found that under the Original Project, construction and operation of 200 multi-family units would be subject to applicable policies in the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) adopted by the City on October 25, 2016 and that the Original Project met the City’s 2020 GHG reduction target as presented in the CAP. Additionally, an assessment was made to determine that the Original Project was consistent with each applicable policy and action of the Energy and Climate Change Element of the City’s General Plan and the CAP.

As the Modified Project would also be subject to applicable policies in the CAP and the General Plan, it likewise would be consistent with local planning efforts to reduce GHGs. As discussed in Section 4.6, Energy, above, the Modified Project would also adhere to the City’s 2020 Energy Reach Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6) and the City’s Natural Gas Ban Code that became effective January 1, 2022 (Richmond Municipal Code new Chapter 9.64), both adopted since certification of the 2018 EIR and that will reduce GHG emissions associated with natural gas. Further, as discussed above, in consideration with the emissions of the Original Project and the findings of the 2018 EIR, the Modified Project’s quantitative GHG emissions would be consistent with the comparative GHG reduction targets of the State’s Climate Change

Page 1597 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 33 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
Scoping Plan Update and would, therefore, be consistent with Statewide efforts to reduce GHGs.

Consequently, the impact of the Modified Project with respect to conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation of an appropriate regulatory agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions is less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures were identified in the 2018 EIR to address climate change and greenhouse gas emissions.

Page 1598 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 34 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED ORIGINAL PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE
2018 QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact HAZ-1: The Project would include the routine transport, use and disposal of hazardous materials but would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. (Criterion a.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact HAZ-2: The Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or environment through an upset or accident involving the release of hazardous materials. (Criterion b.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact HAZ-3: The Project would not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. (Criterion g.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact HAZ-4: The Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. (Criterion h.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact C-HAZ-1: Development under the proposed Project, combined with cumulative development in the region, including past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future development, could contribute considerably to cumulative impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
These impacts are addressed in detail on pages 4.8.17 through 4.8.24 of the Draft EIR.

The 2018 EIR concluded that construction of Original Project would result in less than significant impacts with respect to the potential upset or accidental release of hazardous materials through either transport, use and disposal of hazardous materials or ground disturbance. The 2018 EIR also concluded that potential hazards impacts resulting from the Original Project circulation plan and residential use would be reduced to less than significant with adherence to existing regulatory requirements and all City and Fire Code requirements.

No aspect of the proposed project would change the conditions or environmental impacts regarding hazards and hazardous materials identified for the Original Project in the 2018 EIR. As previously described, the Modified Project would be developed within the same Project development area, with the same soil and groundwater characteristics disclosed and analyzed in the 2018 EIR. The ground disturbance area and proposed land use would be the same as considered in the 2018 EIR. Further, the scale/height of development and associated depth of construction and overall construction activities would be the same or reduced relative to the Original Project analyzed in the 2018 EIR.

Project Construction
The Modified Project would be developed within the same 6.3-acre Project development area requiring the same or reduced level of construction-related activity. The Modified Project would not result in changes to project construction as analyzed in the 2018 EIR. Compliance with existing regulations (i.e., the NPDES permit program), which is a necessary condition of construction, would address potential upsets and accidents related to transport, use and disposal of hazardous materials.

Page 1599 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 35 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
The Original Project site preparation and grading plans, including extensive grading, soil import, mixing, and placement at depths ranging from approximately 1.0 feet to 18 feet, is the same or reduced for the Modified Project. Therefore, disturbance of subsurface soils at the Project site would not result in the accidental dispersal of contamination into the environment nor expose construction workers or the public to contaminants. The Modified Project would not change the Original Project’s less-than-significant construction-related impacts with respect to hazards and hazardous materials.

The Project applicant would develop and implement a construction Traffic Control Plan (TCP) to the satisfaction of the City of Richmond Department of Public Works, Police Department, and Fire Department, would preserve emergency vehicle access during construction, and would not interfere with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan.

Project Operation
The Modified Project would introduce the same residential land use and associated transport, handling, and use of small quantities of hazardous materials, although reduced given the reduced residential density. Adherence to existing regulatory requirements would reduce potential impacts to a less-than-significant level.

The Modified Project would revise the internal circulation to accommodate the single-family home development. However, the appropriate emergency access to and egress from the site is unchanged from the Original Project circulation plan that was designed in accordance with all City and Fire Code requirements (for further information, see Section 4.15, Transportation and Traffic). The Modified Project would result in the same less-than-significant impacts with respect adopted emergency response or evacuation plans and risks associated with wildland fires.

Cumulative
As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to cumulative effects related to hazards and hazardous materials would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

Page 1600 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 36 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures were identified in the 2018 EIR to address hazards and hazardous materials.

Page 1601 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 37 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED ORIGINAL PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE
2018 QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact HYD-1: The Project could result in an increase of stormwater pollutants due to construction activities and/or the introduction of new impervious surfaces with development but would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. (Criterion a.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact HYD-2: The Project would increase impervious surfaces which would reduce the amount of stormwater runoff available for groundwater recharge but not to the extent that it would substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. (Criterion b.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact HYD-3: The Project would not alter the drainage pattern of the site such that it would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off the site. (Criterion c.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact HYD-4: The Project would not alter the drainage pattern of the site or surrounding areas such that it would result in a 100-year flood event on- or off- the site. (Criterion d.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact HYD-5: The Project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing drainage systems or provide additional sources of polluted runoff. (Criterion e.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact HYD-6: The Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam or sea level rise. (Criterion i.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact HYD-7: The Project would not result in or cause inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. (Criterion j.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact C-HYD-1: Development of the Project, in conjunction with past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not result in significant cumulative impacts with respect to hydrology, water quality, or flooding. (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) These impacts are addressed in detail on pages 4.9-13 through 4.9-22 of the Draft EIR and pages 2-13 of the Final EIR.

The 2018 EIR concluded that through compliance with existing regulations, the site construction SWPPP (including BMPs), the required erosion and sediment control plan, and adherence to the NPDES MS4 permit requirements, construction and operation of the Original Project would result in less-than-significant impacts regarding water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, groundwater supplies, erosion and siltation, on- or off-site flooding, and existing drainage system capacity. The Project site is not located in a dam failure inundation area or low lying coastal area subject to inundation by sea level rise.

No aspect of the proposed project would change the conditions or environmental impacts regarding hydrology and water quality identified for the Original Project in the 2018 EIR. The Modified Project would be developed on the same Project development area with the same topographic characteristics. The site preparation and construction activities, the proposed land uses, and the overall layout of roadways and development, including the distribution of unpaved or pervious areas, are generally the same as envisioned and analyzed for the Original Project.

Page 1602 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 38 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
Moreover, the Original Project’s Preliminary Utility Plan and Stormwater Control Plan, including approximately 8,550 square feet of bioretention areas on the site to manage and treat runoff, would be developed and expanded to approximately 9,520 square feet of bioretention areas as a part of the Modified Project. The Modified Project would disturb more than one acre of soil during construction and would be subject to the same NPDES General Construction Permit requirements, NPDES MS4 permit requirements including Provision C.3, Contra Costa Clean Water Program requirements, and City’s sediment and erosion control plan requirements.

Therefore, the Modified Project would result in the same less-than-significant impacts with respect to water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, drainage capacity, groundwater levels, erosion or siltation, and flooding. A final design-level geotechnical investigation would be performed for the Modified Project and Project site in accordance with the current seismic design criteria required under the CBC and impacts related to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow would be less than significant.

Cumulative
As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to cumulative effects related to hydrology and water quality would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures were identified in the 2018 EIR to address hydrology and water quality.

Page 1603 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 39 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.11 Land Use and Planning

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED ORIGINAL PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE
2018 QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact LUP-1: The Project would not divide an established community. (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact LUP-2: The Project would not conflict with applicable regional or local plans and policies adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating environmental effects. (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact C-LUP-1: Development of the Project, in combination with past, present, existing, approved, pending and reasonably foreseeable future projects within and in the vicinity of the Project site, would not result in significant cumulative impacts to land use and planning. (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) These impacts are addressed in detail on pages 4.10-19 through 4.10-30 of the Draft EIR.

The 2018 EIR included a thorough land use and planning consistency analysis including an assessment addressing consistency with applicable General Plan 2030 policies and actions (see Table 4.10-1 of the Draft EIR). The 2018 EIR concluded that the Original Project and associated General Plan Land Use Map Amendment would not divide an established community or conflict with applicable regional or local plans and policies adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating environmental effects, and impacts would be less than significant.

No aspect of the proposed project would change the conditions or environmental impacts regarding land use and planning identified for the Original in the 2018 EIR. The Modified Project would develop a residential community within the same Project development area and include similar vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure improvements facilitating connections between communities.

The Original Project amended the General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and zoning, from Parks and Recreation to Open Space/OS, Open Space (for 12.1 acres of the site) and Medium Density Residential / PA, Planned Area District (PA) (for the 6.3 acres of the Project development area). The Medium Density Residential land use designation allows for the revised single-family housing type at a 12.1 units-per-acre density proposed under the Modified Project.

Although eligible, the Project Applicant has not requested a density increase allowed under the State Density Bonus Law (Gov. Code, § 65915). The Project Applicant has requested eligible waivers to the following specific City development standards, as allowed for density-bonus eligible projects: 1) a reduced minimum lot size; 2) a reduced minimum lot width; 3) a reduced minimum front setback; 4) a reduced minimum interior side setback; and 5) a reduced minimum rear setback.

The Modified Project has proposed an updated Planned Area Plan (PA Plan) describing the standards under which the Modified Project would be developed (including the waivers listed above), a new Tentative Map, and Design Review application for the house plans. As noted in the 2018 EIR, the City Planning Division staff would review the PA Plan for consistency with the General Plan, and the PA Plan would also be subject to Planning Commission and City Council

Page 1604 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 40 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
review and approval. This process would ensure the Project’s consistency with the Zoning Ordinance.

Despite the proposed shift in housing type and residential density, the Modified Project would be consistent with pertinent land use policies of the General Plan 2030. Several land use policies highlighted in the 2018 EIR would not be fully supported by the Modified Project (see the Draft EIR Table 4,10-1). Policies LU1.1: Higher-Density and Infill Mixed-Use Development, LU5.1: A Balanced Mix of Land Uses, and LU6.1: Pedestrian and Transit-Oriented Urban Environment, call for higher-density residential development and diverse housing options. While the Modified Project would not develop the density or diversity of housing options proposed under the Original Project, it would not be inconsistent with these policies or preclude denser, more diverse housing types, and mixed-use development in the Point Richmond community.

The reduced residential density would not alter the 2018 EIR’s consistency finding with the Parks Master Plan and Urban Greening Master Plan, East Bay Regional Park District Master Plan 2013, the Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA), and ABAG’s goals for the Bay Trail project. As described in Section 4.8, Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this document, the Modified Project would be consistent with the City’s current Climate Action Plan and would therefore be consistent with the overall goals of Plan Bay Area.

Cumulative
As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to cumulative effects related to land use and planning would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures were identified in the 2018 EIR to address land use and planning.

Page 1605 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 41 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.12 Noise

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED ORIGINAL PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE
2018 QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact NOI-1: Construction of the Project would result in a temporary increase in ambient noise levels. (Criteria a., c.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact NOI-2: Occupants of the proposed Project buildings could be exposed to high noise levels. (Criteria a., b.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact NOI-3: Project operations could cause a long-term increase in ambient noise levels in the Project site vicinity. (Criterion b.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact NOI-4: Project construction could generate ground-borne vibration. (Criterion f.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact C-NOI-1: Project construction activities combined with cumulative construction noise in the vicinity of the Project site could cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project site vicinity during construction. (Less than Significant with Mitigation) Impact C-NOI-2: Operation of the proposed Project when considered with other cumulative development would not cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity. (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
These impacts are addressed in detail on pages 4.11-15 through 4.11-24 of the Draft EIR.

The 2018 EIR concluded that construction of the Original Project would result in less than significant noise impacts with implementation of Mitigation Measure C-NOI-1: Construction Noise Control Measures and Noise Control Plan (see below). Operation of the Original Project was also determined to result in less-than significant impacts related to exposure to high noise levels and long-term increases in ambient noise levels.

No aspect of the proposed project would change the conditions or environmental impacts regarding noise identified for the Original Project in the 2018 EIR. The Modified Project would be developed on the same Project development area. The site preparation and construction activities would be the same or reduced relative to the Original Project analyzed in the 2018 EIR.

The Modified Project would be subject to the City of Richmond Noise Ordinance regulating construction noise times, days, and standards. Therefore, the Modified Project would result in the same less-than-significant impacts with regard to temporary increases in ambient noise levels and ground-borne vibration during construction.

The Modified Project would introduce single-family homes to the Project site at a reduced residential density compared with the Original Project analyzed in the 2018 EIR. As discussed in the 2018 EIR, the Richmond General Plan 2030 establishes land use compatibility standards for new development within Richmond. Ambient noise levels are “normally acceptable” if below 65 Ldn around new multi-family residential uses and if below 60 Ldn around new single-family residential uses. “Conditionally acceptable” noise levels are the same for multi-family and singlefamily homes at between 60 and 70 Ldn. As presented in Figure 4.11-2 in the Draft EIR, monitored long-term noise levels at the Project site ranged from 57 to 60 Ldn and thus would be considered to be normally acceptable for the proposed single-family land use.

Page 1606 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 42 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
As shown in Table 4-3 the Modified Project would result in fewer daily and peak hour (AM and PM) vehicle trips compared with the Original Project traffic. Therefore, the Modified Project would result in the same or reduced less-than-significant traffic noise impacts.

Cumulative
The 2018 EIR identified a potentially significant cumulative noise impact, specifically on the residences in the Sea Cliff Estates subdivision, if the Original Project were to be constructed simultaneously with the Miller/Knox park LUPA which is within 300 feet of the Project site. The exact phasing and type of development under the Miller/Knox park LUPA is still not known as of the date of this document. Therefore, because construction activities that would take place within Miller/Knox park are as yet unknown, this impact is conservatively determined to be potentially significant and Mitigation Measure C-NOI-1: Construction Noise Control Measures and Noise Control Plan, would apply to the Modified Project.

As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to cumulative effects related to noise would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

No revisions are required to the 2018 EIR analysis of the Original Project to address potential noise impacts of the Modified Project.

Mitigation Measures
The following mitigation measures from the 2018 EIR, will continue to apply to the Modified Project to address significant noise impacts.

Mitigation Measure C-NOI-1: Construction Noise Control Measures and Noise Control Plan. For any Project construction activities that would take place simultaneously with construction activities that would take place in Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline park (as part of activities associated with the Land Use Plan Amendment) and within 500 feet of the Project site, the applicant shall employ site-specific noise attenuation measures during Project construction to reduce the generation of construction noise. These measures shall be included in a Noise Control Plan that shall be submitted for review and approval by the City of Richmond Planning and Building Services Department to ensure that construction noise meets the standards set forth in the City’s Noise ordinance. Measures specified in the Noise Control Plan and implemented during Project construction may include the following noise control strategies:
 Equipment and trucks used for construction shall use the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment redesign, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds);
 Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for construction shall be

Page 1607 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 43 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. Where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to approximately 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves or similar devices shall be used; this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. Quieter procedures, such as use of drills rather than impact tools, shall be used; and
 Stationary noise sources on site shall be located as far from adjacent receptors as may physically be accommodated, and they shall be muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds, incorporate insulation barriers, or include similar measures to reduce noise.

Page 1608 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 44 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.13 Population, Housing, and Employment

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED ORIGINAL PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE
2018 QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact POP-1: The Project would not directly or indirectly induce substantial population growth. (Criterion a.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact C-POP-1: Development of the Project, in combination with past, present, existing, approved, pending and reasonably foreseeable future projects within and in the vicinity of the Project site, would not result in a significant impact on population and housing. (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) These impacts are addressed in detail on pages 4.12.6 through 4.12-10 of the Draft EIR.

The 2018 EIR analysis relied on a four percent vacancy factor and an average of 1.9 persons per household yielding 365 new residents associated with the Original Project’s proposed 200 multifamily residential units. The direct population growth was determined to be consistent with citywide population (and housing) forecasts, assumptions of growth in the City overall anticipated by General Plan 2030, Association of Bay Area Governments- (ABAG) projected growth within the City, and housing goals of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA).

The 2018 EIR concluded that the Original Project would not induce indirect growth by constructing new infrastructure such as roads and utilities due to the limitations of the new infrastructure within the Project development area, surrounding land use designations, and other physical constraints. The potential for the Original Project to induce new commercial development by creating demand for services and goods was determined to be speculative and insubstantial and the overall impact would be less than significant.

The Modified Project would develop 76 single-family detached homes ranging between 2,100 and 3,100 square feet. Although the average persons-per-household in the Project site census tract is 1.9, given the change in density, unit size, and housing type, it is reasonable to assume a persons-per-household rate for the Modified Project that is closer to the rate for surrounding census tracts (2.1, 3.2, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, and 3.9) and the City and County as a whole (3 and 2.9 respectively). Therefore, this analysis assumes a four percent vacancy factor and an average of

2.9 persons per household resulting in approximately 212 new residents, a reduction compared with the Original Project. The reduced population would result in the same less-than-significant impacts related to direct population growth and indirect population growth due to increased demand for services and goods.

The Modified Project would not alter that Original Project’s proposed infrastructure, including roads and utilities, and therefore would result in the same less-than-significant impacts with respect to the indirect inducement of population growth.

Cumulative
As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to

Page 1609 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 45 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
cumulative effects related to population and housing would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

Summary
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the 2018 EIR, implementation of the Modified Project would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts identified in the 2018 EIR, nor would it result in new significant impacts related to population and housing that were not identified in the 2018 EIR. No revisions are required to the 2018 EIR analysis of the Original Project to address potential population and housing impacts of the Modified Project.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures were identified in the 2018 EIR to address population, housing, and employment impacts.

Page 1610 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 46 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.14 Public Services

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED ORIGINAL PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE
2018 QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact PUB-1: The Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services. (Criteria a., b., c.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact C-PUB-1: Construction activity and operations for development of the Project, in combination with past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects with the vicinity of the Project site, would not contribute considerably to a cumulative impact related to public services and recreation. (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
These impacts are addressed in detail on pages 4.13-10 through 4.13-16 of the Draft EIR.

The 2018 EIR concluded that the Original Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with an increased demand for public services. The new residential community at the Project development area would not affect fire or police service ratios or response times, impact park facilities to an extent that new facilities would be required, or otherwise substantially impact other public services such as hospitals or libraries. The Original Project would be required to comply with Senate Bill (SB) 50, which would fully mitigate the potential effect of new student population on public school facilities.

As discussed in the previous section regarding population, housing and employment; the Modified Project would generate 76 residential units and an estimated 212 residents compared with the Original Project’s 200 residential units and 365 residents. The Modified Project would have the same or reduced less-than-significant impacts related to fire, police, schools, and other public services.

The Modified Project would not include private amenities to accommodate some of the potential increase in demand for recreational opportunities. However, the Modified Project would still rebuild a portion of the Bay Trail and the Project Applicant has agreed to contribute funding for local park improvements in addition to the required development impact fee. The adjacent 307- acre Miller/Knox park would provide ample open space and recreation area for the new project residents and the impact would be less than significant.

Cumulative
As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to cumulative effects related to public services would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

Page 1611 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 47 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
Summary
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the 2018 EIR, implementation of the Modified Project would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts identified in the 2018 EIR, nor would it result in new significant impacts related to public services that were not identified in the 2018 EIR. No revisions are required to the 2018 EIR analysis of the Original Project to address potential public services impacts of the Modified Project.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures were identified in the 2018 EIR to address public services and recreation.

Page 1612 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 48 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.15 Transportation and Traffic

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE QUARRY

RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact TRF-1: The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non‐motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways. (Criterion a.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact TRF-2: The Project would not conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways. (Criterion b.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact TRF-3: The Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., use of large farm equipment). (Criterion c.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact TRF-4: The Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. (Criterion d.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact TRF-5: The Project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. (Criteria e., f.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact TRF-6: Project construction would result in a substantial, though temporary, adverse effect on the circulation system during the Project construction period. (Criterion g.) (Less than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
These impacts are addressed in detail on pages 4.14-26 through 4.14-39 of the Draft EIR, and pages 2-17 through 2-19 of the Final EIR.

Modified Quarry Residential Project Analysis
The Modified Project would have similar residential uses at the same location and similar modifications to the surrounding transportation network as the Original Project evaluated in the 2018 EIR but with fewer units. Thus, as described below, the Modified Project would result in similar less-than-significant impacts on transportation and traffic as the Original Project.

Although CEQA requirements for identifying transportation and traffic impacts have changed since the certification of the 2018 EIR to rely on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) instead of level of service (LOS) or similar measures of automobile delay and congestion, this Addendum does not directly address the impacts of the Modified Project on VMT because VMT was accounted for in the air quality and GHG impact evaluation of the 2018 EIR, and therefore, is not considered a new impact topic that would need to be disclosed. Specifically, VMT is not considered new information that was not known and could not have been known when the 2018 EIR was certified (Public Resource Code Section 21166) as described in more detail below.

Trip Generation
Table 4-3 summarizes the trip generation for the Modified Project generally and compares it with the trip generation for the Original Project evaluated in the 2018 EIR. As shown in Table 4-3, 80

Page 1613 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 49 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
units would generate approximately 46 fewer trips during the AM peak hour, approximately 52 fewer trips during the PM peak hour, and approximately 574 fewer trips on a typical weekday than the Original Project evaluated in the 2018 EIR. Since the Modified Project proposes slightly fewer than 80 units (76 units), the peak hour and total daily trips would be slightly less than those shown in Table 4-3 and thereby the 2018 EIR.

TABLE 4-3

AUTOMOBILE TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES
Land Use
ITE
Code Unitsa
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily
In Out Total In Out Total Total
Residential Units 210b 80 DU 16 45 61 51 30 81 822
Total Automobile Trips (Modified Project) 16 45 61 51 30 81 822 Total Automobile Trips (Original Project)c 21 86 107 89 44 133 1,396 Net Difference -5
(-25%)
-41
(-48%)
-46
(-43%)
-38
(-43%)
-14
(-32%)
-52
(-39%)
-574
(-41%)
NOTES:
a DU = dwelling unit. Trip generation estimates shown are conservative (overstated) as the Modified Project proposes 76 units, fewer than the 80 units assumed in this table.
b ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) land use category 210 (Single-Family Detached Housing):

AM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.91 Ln(X) + 0.12, (26% in, 74% out) PM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.94 Ln(X) + 0.27, (63% in, 37% out) Daily: Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.68
Where T= Trips Generated, X = Number of Units c Source: Quarry Residential Project Draft EIR, Table 4.14-5 Source: Trip Generation (11th Edition), ITE, 2021; Fehr & Peers Intersection Operations
The 2018 EIR evaluated the impacts of the Original Project on five intersections under Existing Plus Project and Cumulative (2040) Plus Project conditions based on LOS and did not identify any significant impacts on intersection operations. Since the Modified Project would have a lower trip generation than the Original Project, it would add fewer trips to the five study intersections.

Therefore, the Modified Project would have a smaller impact at the study intersections and not cause new significant impacts at the study intersections under Existing Plus Project or Cumulative (2040) Plus Project conditions.

Freeway Operations
The 2018 EIR evaluated the impacts of the Original Project on two freeway segments under Cumulative (2040) Plus Project conditions using Delay Index and did not identify any significant impacts on freeway operations. Since the Modified Project would have a lower trip generation than the Original Project, it would add fewer trips to the two freeway segments. Therefore, the Modified Project would have a smaller impact on the freeway segments and not cause any new significant impacts on the freeway segments under Cumulative (2040) Plus Project conditions.

Page 1614 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 50 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
Hazards and Safety, Emergency Access, Plan Consistency, and Construction The project area for the Modified Project, including the location of the main driveway and the emergency vehicle access only driveway on Seacliff Drive, is consistent with the project area for the Original Project. Therefore, it would result in the same less-than-significant impacts identified in the 2018 EIR regarding the potential for the Modified Project to increase hazards due to a design feature. The Modified Project would also allow for adequate emergency access to the site, same as identified for the Original Project. Since the Modified Project would continue to provide similar land uses and have the same modifications to the surrounding transportation network as the Original Project, it would continue to have the same less-than-significant impact on consistency with adopted policies, plans and programs supporting alternative transportation. In addition, construction activity anticipated for the Modified Project also would be similar to that analyzed in the 2018 EIR, and therefore would remain less than significant.

Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
Article 15.04.612 of the City’s Zoning Code requires residential developments with more than ten units to implement transportation demand management (TDM) measures that reduce to the extent feasible single-occupant vehicle trip generation rates 15 percent below the standard rates as established in the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. However, considering the location of the Modified Project in a somewhat isolated area with limited non-automobile connections, over one-mile from the nearest transit service, and not within walking distance of any major commercial or employment centers, there are no feasible infrastructure improvements or operational strategies that could reduce the singleoccupant vehicle trips generated by the Modified Project to 15 percent below the trip generation estimated by the ITE Trip Generation Manual and presented in Table 4-3.

Vehicle Miles Traveled
On September 17, 2013, California Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill (SB) 743 into law.

SB 743 required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the analysis of transportation impacts. Historically, most lead agencies treated automobile delay and congestion as environmental impacts, and those impacts were measured using LOS analysis. SB 743 instead required the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to revise the CEQA Guidelines to prescribe an alternative analysis metric to LOS that would promote the reduction of GHG emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.

Once the CEQA Guidelines were updated to reflect the directives of SB 743, automobile delay or other measures of traffic congestion were not to be used to measure a significant environmental impact.

In December 2018, the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted an update to the CEQA Guidelines that incorporated the direction of SB 743, specifically including modifications to the Appendix G Checklist questions for transportation impacts. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 requires transportation impacts to be analyzed using VMT; this section began applying to new CEQA documents as of July 1, 2020. The City of Richmond adopted CEQA thresholds of significance for VMT analysis in February 2021, consistent with the ones recommended by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority.

Page 1615 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 51 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
VMT has long been used as a metric for measuring air quality and GHG impacts in California.

The 2018 EIR evaluated the air quality and GHG impacts associated with potential VMT changes resulting from the Original Project. The adoption of VMT as a new metric for the measurement of transportation impacts under CEQA does not constitute new significant information, because VMT associated with the Project was already disclosed and evaluated in the 2018 EIR.

Furthermore, an addendum is not required to consider new impact areas added to CEQA after the underlying EIR was certified. See Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301, 1320 (adoption of new guidelines for GHG evaluation was not significant new information requiring further CEQA review because GHG emissions were known information and could have been addressed in the original EIR); Fort Mojave Indian Tribe v. Dept. of Health Servs. (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 1574, 1605 (new critical habitat regulation was not significant new information because impacts to the species had already been addressed in original EIR.).

The 2018 EIR’s discussion of VMT makes clear that VMT was a clearly understood metric for measuring air quality and GHG impacts at the time the EIR was certified. Thus, no new analysis of VMT to address the Project’s impacts on transportation and traffic is required.

Cumulative
As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to cumulative effects related to transportation and traffic would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

Summary
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of 2018 EIR, implementation of the Modified Project would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts identified in the 2018 EIR, nor would it result in new significant impacts related to transportation and traffic that were not identified in the 2018 EIR. Nor is there new information of substantial importance that would change that analysis. The adoption of VMT as a new metric for the measurement of transportation impacts under CEQA does not constitute new significant information, because VMT associated with the Project was calculated and disclosed at the time of the 2018 EIR for use in the air quality and GHG impact analyses. Thus, impacts related to VMT were known or could have been known at the time the 2018 EIR was certified. See Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301, 1320 and Fort Mojave Indian Tribe v. Dept. of Health Servs. (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 1574, 1605. For these reasons, no revisions are required to the 2018 EIR analysis of the Original Project to address potential transportation and traffic impacts of the Modified Project and no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures were identified in the 2018 EIR to address transportation and traffic impacts.

Page 1616 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 52 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022 Page 1617 of 1760

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 53 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

4.16 Utilities and Service Systems

PREVIOUSLY-IDENTIFIED ORIGINAL PROJECT IMPACTS IN THE
2018 QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR
Impact UTL-1: The Project would not require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. (Criterion b.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact UTL-2: The water demand generated by development under the Project would not exceed water supplies available from existing entitlements and resources, or need expanded entitlements. (Criterion d.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
Impact UTL-3: Development of the Project could exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board or result in a determination that new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities would be required. (Criteria a., b., and e.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact UTL-4: Development of the Project would require or result in construction of new onsite stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. (Criterion c.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact UTL-5: Development of the Project would not violate applicable federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste, or generate solid waste that would exceed the permitted capacity of the landfills serving the area. (Criteria f. and g.) (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required) Impact C-UTL-1: Project construction activity and operational activities in combination with past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the vicinity would not contribute considerably to cumulative impacts to utilities and service systems. (Less Than Significant, No Mitigation Required)
These impacts are addressed in detail on pages 4.15-18 through 4.15-26 of the Draft EIR and page 2-19 of the Final EIR.

The 2018 EIR concluded that the Original Project would result in less-than-significant impacts to utilities and service systems. Construction-related impacts associated with Project utility infrastructure improvements were addressed and mitigated throughout the 2018 EIR.

Construction of other necessary improvements to infrastructure were not anticipated to result in significant environmental effects. The Original Project’s increased demand for fire flow, water treatment, potable water, wastewater treatment and conveyance, would be accommodated by existing facilities, infrastructure improvements included as a part of the Project, and compliance with existing regulations such as City ordinances, NPDES General Construction Permit, and CALGreen. New impervious surface and associated stormwater runoff would be mitigated by approximately 8,550 square feet of on-site bioretention features and compliance with Provision C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NDPES Permit. Finally, the 2018 EIR determined that compliance with existing regulations such as AB 939 and CALGreen would ensure solid waste generated by Project construction and operation could be accommodated by existing solid waste facilities and that the Original Project would not impede the City’s ability to meet diversion requirements and other solid waste regulations.

No aspect of the proposed project would change the conditions or environmental impacts regarding utilities and service systems identified for the Original Project in the 2018 EIR. The Modified Project would be developed on the same Project development area using the same Preliminary Utility Plan. The updated Stormwater Control Plan would increase the size of

Page 1618 of 1760 ends

4. CEQA Analysis
Quarry Residential Project 54 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
bioretention areas on the site to approximately 9,520 square feet. Construction activities, proposed land use, and distribution of unpaved or pervious areas, are generally the same as envisioned and analyzed for the Original Project. The reduced residential density would result in reduced demand for all utilities and service systems relative to the Original Project analyzed in the 2018 EIR. The Modified Project would be subject to the same NPDES General Construction Permit requirements, NPDES MS4 permit requirements including Provision C.3, City ordinances, and CALGreen. Therefore, the Modified Project would result in the same less-than-significant impacts with respect to fire flow, water treatment, potable water, wastewater treatment and conveyance, stormwater treatment and conveyance, and solid waste.

Cumulative
As discussed above in this section, the Modified Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to those identified in the 2018 EIR, and its contribution to cumulative effects related to utilities and service systems would be the same or less than identified in the 2018 EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures were identified in the 2018 EIR to address utilities and service systems.

Page 1619 of 1760 ends

5. Conclusions
Quarry Residential Project 55 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

5. Conclusions
An evaluation of the Revised Quarry Residential Project is presented in the CEQA Analysis in Section 4 of this addendum. The evaluation supports a determination that the Modified Project qualifies for an addendum to the certified 2018 EIR.

5.1 Proposed Changes to the Original Project
Summarizing from Section 3, Project Description, the Modified Project’s project site and Project development area is the same as the project site and Project development area for the Original Project. In terms of land uses and development, compared to the Original Project, the Modified Project would develop 76 detached single-family houses as opposed to the Original Project’s 200 multi-family units resulting in 124 fewer residential units overall. These changes result in approximately 153 fewer residents compared to the 365 previously analyzed in the 2018 EIR.

5.2 Implications of Proposed Project Changes to the Original Project
This evaluation concludes that the Modified Project qualifies for an addendum. Any potential environmental impacts associated with development of the Modified Project were adequately analyzed and covered by the analysis in the 2018 EIR. The Modified Project would be required to comply with the applicable mitigation measures identified in the 2018 EIR and presented in the Section 4 and the revised MMRP (Attachment A). With implementation of the applicable mitigation measures, the Modified Project would not result in an increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts in the 2018 EIR or result in any new significant impacts that were not previously identified in the 2018 EIRs. Therefore, no further review or analysis under CEQA is required.

5.3 Findings
In accordance with California Public Resources Code Section 21166, CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, and as set forth in the CEQA Analysis in Section 4 of this document, the Revised Quarry Residential Project qualifies for an addendum because the following findings can be made:

Addendum Findings: The Revised Quarry Residential Project:
 would not cause new significant impacts not previously identified in the previously certified 2018 EIR; nor result in a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts;
 no new mitigation measures would be necessary to reduce significant impacts;  no changes have occurred with respect to circumstances assumed in the 2018 EIR that would cause significant environmental impacts to which the Campus Bay Project would contribute considerably; and

Page 1620 of 1760 ends

5. Conclusions
Quarry Residential Project 56 ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022
 no new information has been put forward that shows that the Revised Quarry Residential Project would cause new significant environmental impacts.  Therefore, no supplemental environmental review is required or allowed in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164.

The above findings satisfy CEQA compliance for the proposed revised Quarry Residential Project (Modified Project).
___________________________________

Page 1621 of 1760 ends

Quarry Residential Project ATT-A ESA / D161035.01
EIR Addendum March 2022

ATTACHMENT A
Revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program (MMRP) for the Modified Project

Page 1622 of 1760 ends

Blank
This page is intentionally blank.

Page 1623 of 1760 ends

Quarry Residential Project A-1 ESA / D161035
EIR Addendum March 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Project Mitigation Measures
Implemented
By Monitored By
Monitoring and Reporting
Action
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification of
Compliance

4.1 Aesthetics
None required.

4.2 Air Quality
Mitigation Measure AIR-1: Best Management Practices for Controlling Particulate Emissions. The following BAAQMD Best Management Practices for particulate control will be implemented for all project construction activities. These measures will reduce particulate emissions primarily during soil movement, grading and demolition activities but also during vehicle and equipment movement on unpaved project sites

1. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day.

2. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material offsite shall be covered.

3. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.

4. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph.

5. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.

6. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, § 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.

7. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and
determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.

In addition, construction vehicle washing shall be prohibited on the Project site.

Project
Applicant /
Project
Contractor
City of
Richmond
Building
Division and
Engineering
Services
Department
Engineering Services
Department to verify inclusion
of BAAQMD BMPs in
applicable construction plans
and specifications.

City of Richmond Building
Division to inspect site during
construction to ensure
compliance with Project
construction plans.

Prior to issuance of
building permit.

Field inspections
during construction.

Verified by:

Date:

Mitigation Measure AIR-2: Enhanced Exhaust Emissions
Reduction Measures. The applicant shall implement the following measures during construction to further reduce construction-related exhaust emissions:

Project
Applicant /
Project
Contractor
City of
Richmond
Building
Division and
Engineering
Engineering Services
Department to verify inclusion
of enhanced exhaust emissions
reduction measures in
applicable construction plans
and specifications.

Prior to issuance of
building permit.

Field inspections
during construction.

Verified by:

Date:

Page 1624 of 1760 ends

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Quarry Residential Project A-2 ESA / D161035
EIR Addendum March 2022
Project Mitigation Measures
Implemented
By Monitored By
Monitoring and Reporting
Action
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification of
Compliance
All off-road equipment greater than 25 horsepower (hp) and operating for more than 20 total hours over the entire duration of construction activities shall meet the following requirements:

1. Where access to alternative sources of power are available, portable diesel engines shall be prohibited; and
Services
Department

4.2 Air Quality (cont.)

2. All off-road equipment shall have:
a. Engines that meet or exceed either USEPA or CARB Tier 3 off-road emission standards, and
b. Engines that are retrofitted with a CARB Level 3 Verified Diesel Emissions Control Strategy. Acceptable options for reducing emissions include the use of late model engines, low-emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after-treatment products, add-on devices such as particulate filters, and/or other options as such are available.
(cont.) City of Richmond
Building Division to inspect site
during construction to ensure
compliance with Project
construction plans.

4.3 Biological Resources
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nesting Bird Protection Measures. The Project applicant shall conduct preconstruction nesting bird surveys in areas containing, or likely to contain, habitat for nesting birds (i.e., areas with shrub vegetation) as a condition of approval for any development-related permit. Specific measures to avoid and minimize impacts on nesting birds include, but are not limited to, those described below.
a) Construction activities including vegetation removal and construction shall be performed between September 1 and January 31 in order to avoid the avian nesting season.
b) If construction activities cannot be completed between September 1 and January 31, a preconstruction survey for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist.

During the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall survey construction areas within and in the vicinity of the Project site for nesting raptors and passerine birds not more than 30 days prior to any
ground-disturbing activity or vegetation removal. All
accessible potential nesting habitat, including bare ground, in the Project site and within a 500-foot buffer area (for raptors) and 250-foot buffer area (for all other species) around any construction activity will be surveyed.
c) If active nests are found either within the Project site or within the survey buffer, “no-work” buffer zones shall be established around the nests by a qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW as necessary depending on the
Project
Applicant /
Project
Contractor
City of
Richmond
Building
Division
Building Division to review and
approve a qualified biologist,
and to review pre-construction
survey reports.

If active nests are found,
inspect construction site to
confirm buffer zones.

Review prior to
issuance of
building permit.

Field inspections 30
days prior to
construction and
after breaks of 14
days or longer if
construction falls
within nesting
season (January 15
– August).

Verified by:

Date:

Page 1625 of 1760 ends

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Quarry Residential Project A-3 ESA / D161035
EIR Addendum March 2022
Project Mitigation Measures
Implemented
By Monitored By
Monitoring and Reporting
Action
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification of
Compliance
specific species encountered. No vegetation removal or
ground-disturbing activities shall occur within the no-work buffer zone until young have fledged or the nest is otherwise abandoned as determined by the qualified biologist. If work during the nesting season stops for 14 days or more and then resumes, then nesting bird surveys shall be repeated, to ensure that no new birds have begun nesting in the area.

4.3 Biological Resources (cont.)
Typically, the size of individual “no-work” buffers ranges from a minimum of 250 feet for raptors to a minimum of 50 feet for other birds but can be adjusted based on an evaluation of the site by a qualified biologist in cooperation with the USFWS and/or CDFW as necessary (i.e., in the case of protected species). Buffer distances may also be modified if obstacles such as buildings or trees obscure the construction area from active bird nests, or existing disturbances create an ambient background
disturbance similar to the proposed disturbance.
d) Birds that establish nests after construction starts are assumed to be habituated to and tolerant of the indirect impacts resulting from construction noise and human
activity. However, direct take of nests, eggs, and nestlings is still prohibited and a buffer must be established to avoid nest destruction.
e) Results of the surveys shall be forwarded to CDFW (if required by state law based on the species observed) and avoidance procedures shall be adopted, if necessary, on a case-by-case basis. These may include construction buffer areas (up to several hundred feet in the case of raptors) or seasonal avoidance.

4.4 Cultural and Paleontological Resources
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Preconstruction Training, Cultural Resources Monitoring, and Inadvertent Discovery of Cultural Resources.
a. Archeological Site CA-CCO-400: Preconstruction Training and Cultural Resources Monitoring. Prior to authorization to proceed, a Secretary of the Interior-qualified archaeologist shall prepare a cultural resources monitoring plan. The City of Richmond shall review and approve the plan. The plan shall include a requirement for monitoring of construction activities within 200 feet of archeological site CA-CCO-400 by both a qualified archeologist and, if reasonably available, a Native American representative.

The City shall conduct good faith outreach (phone calls and emails) to tribal representatives identified by the Native American Heritage Commission in their February 6, 2016 letter as having potential interest in the Project site (see Appendix D of the Draft Project
Applicant /
Project
Contractor
City of
Richmond
Building
Division
City of
Richmond
Building
Division
Building Division to review and
approve of archaeologist, of
cultural resources monitoring
plan and of the construction
plan that includes
archaeological mitigation.

If resources are encountered,
Contractor to verify work is
suspended as required, review
and approve paleontologist and
paleontologist’s
recommendations.

If resources encountered are
found to be qualifying as
Prior to issuance of
building permit for,
or commencement
of, any grounddisturbing activities.

Field inspections
during construction.

Verified by:

Date:

Page 1626 of 1760 ends

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Quarry Residential Project A-4 ESA / D161035
EIR Addendum March 2022
Project Mitigation Measures
Implemented
By Monitored By
Monitoring and Reporting
Action
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification of
Compliance
EIR). The plan shall include (but not be limited to) the following components:
 A training program for all construction and field workers involved in site disturbance that would be completed prior to the commencement of construction activities and that would train site workers in the identification of potential cultural resources, and actions to be undertaken in the event that potential cultural resources are discovered;
described in the measure, the
City to ensure preservation
measures are implemented or
that the ARDTP is completed
and submitted to NWIC.

City to inspect site during
construction to ensure
compliance with project
construction plans.

4.4 Cultural and Paleontological Resources (cont.)
 The identification of person(s) responsible for conducting monitoring activities, including Native American monitors;  The identification of person(s) responsible for overseeing and directing the monitors;
 Monitoring protocols and procedures and the required format and content of monitoring reports;
 The schedule for submittal of monitoring reports and
identification of person(s) responsible for review and approval of monitoring reports;
 A protocol for notifications in the event cultural resources are encountered, as well as methods of dealing with the
encountered resources (e.g., collection, identification, curation);
 Methods to ensure the security of cultural resources sites; and  A protocol for notifying local authorities (i.e. Sheriff, Police) should site looting and other illegal activities occur during construction.

Inadvertent Discovery of Cultural Resources. If archaeological resources are encountered during Project construction, including in the vicinity of archeological site CA-CCO-400, the following steps shall be undertaken:
 All soil disturbing activities within 100 feet in all directions of the find shall cease until the resource is evaluated;
 The monitor shall immediately notify the City of Richmond of the encountered archaeological resource;
 The monitor shall, after making a reasonable effort to assess the identity, integrity, and significance of the encountered

Page 1627 of 1760 ends

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Quarry Residential Project A-5 ESA / D161035
EIR Addendum March 2022
Project Mitigation Measures
Implemented
By Monitored By
Monitoring and Reporting
Action
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification of
Compliance
archaeological resource, present the findings of this
assessment to the City; and
 A Secretary of the Interior-qualified archaeologist shall inspect the find within 24 hours of discovery.

Historic-period materials might include stone, concrete, or adobe footings and walls; filled wells or privies; and deposits of metal, glass, and/or ceramic refuse.

4.4 Cultural and Paleontological Resources (cont.)
In the event archaeological resources qualifying as either historical resources pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 or as unique archaeological resources as defined by Public Resources Code 21083.2 are encountered, mitigation shall be implemented in accordance with PRC Section 21083.2 and Section 15126.4 of the CEQA Guidelines, with a preference for preservation in place. The archaeologist, in consultation with the City of Richmond and the culturally-affiliated Native American group(s) shall determine whether to pursue preservation in place. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)(3), this may be accomplished through planning construction to avoid the resource; incorporating the resource within open space; capping and covering the resource; or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement.

Treatment of unique archaeological resources shall follow the applicable requirements of PRC Section 21083.2. The ARDTP shall identify how the proposed data recovery program would preserve the significant information the archaeological resource contains, and shall include and/or require the following:
 Identification of the scientific/historic research questions applicable to the expected resource, the data classes the resource is expected to possess, and how the expected data classes would address the applicable research questions;

Page 1628 of 1760 ends

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Quarry Residential Project A-6 ESA / D161035
EIR Addendum March 2022
Project Mitigation Measures
Implemented
By Monitored By
Monitoring and Reporting
Action
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification of
Compliance
 Documentation of the results of the investigation in a timely manner, in a technical report that provides a full artifact catalog, analysis of items collected, results of any special studies conducted, and interpretations of the resource within a regional and local context;
 Details regarding treatment, which for most resources would consist of (but would not be not limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, site documentation, and historical research, with the aim to target the recovery of important scientific data contained in the portion(s) of the significant resource to be impacted by the Project;
 Dissemination of report/s to local and state repositories, libraries, and interested professionals; and
 Curation of artifacts and data at an approved facility.

4.4 Cultural and Paleontological Resources (cont.)
The City of Richmond shall submit all technical documents to the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System.

Project
Applicant /
Project
Contractor
City of
Richmond
Building
Division
Verify mitigation measure on
construction plans.

Inspect site during construction
to ensure compliance with
project construction plans.

Prior to issuance of
a building permit
for, or
commencement of,
any grounddisturbing activities.

Field inspections
during construction.

Verified by:

Date:

Mitigation Measure CUL-3: Preconstruction Training,
Paleontological Monitoring, and Accidental Discovery of Paleontological Resources. Prior to construction, a qualified paleontologist with expertise in California paleontology will develop a paleontological resources training program for all construction and field workers involved in ground-disturbing activities that details the recognition and importance of paleontological resources, and Project
Applicant /
Project
Contractor
Project
Applicant /
Project
Contractor
City of
Richmond
Building
Division
If resources are encountered,
Contractor to verify work is
suspended as required, review
and approve paleontologist and
paleontologist’s
recommendations.

City to inspect site during
construction to ensure
Prior to issuance of
a building permit
for, or
commencement of,
any grounddisturbing activities.

Field inspections
during construction.

Verified by:

Date:

Page 1629 of 1760 ends

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Quarry Residential Project A-7 ESA / D161035
EIR Addendum March 2022
Project Mitigation Measures
Implemented
By Monitored By
Monitoring and Reporting
Action
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification of
Compliance
establishes accidental discovery procedures should paleontological resources be encountered during construction.

If paleontological resources, such as fossilized bone, teeth, shell, tracks, trails, casts, molds, or impressions are discovered during ground-disturbing activities, work shall stop in that area and within 100 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can assess the nature and importance of the find and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in conformance with SVP
standards, and in consultation with the City of Richmond. compliance with Project
construction plans.

4.5 Energy Resources
None required.

4.6 Geology, Soils, and Minerals
None required.

4.7 Climate Change and Greenhouse Gases
None required.

4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
None required.

4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality
None required.

4.10 Land Use and Planning
None required.

Page 1630 of 1760 ends

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Quarry Residential Project A-8 ESA / D161035
EIR Addendum March 2022
Project Mitigation Measures
Implemented
By Monitored By
Monitoring and Reporting
Action
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification of
Compliance

4.11 Noise
Mitigation Measure C-NOI-1: Construction Noise Control
Measures and Noise Control Plan. For any Project construction activities that would take place simultaneously with construction activities that would take place in Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline park (as part of activities associated with the Land Use Plan Amendment) and within 500 feet of the Project site, the applicant shall employ sitespecific noise attenuation measures during project construction to reduce the generation of construction noise. These measures shall be included in a Noise Control Plan that shall be submitted for review and approval by the City of Richmond Planning and Building Services Department to ensure that construction noise meets the standards set forth in the City’s Noise ordinance. Measures specified in the Noise Control Plan and implemented during Project construction may include the following noise control strategies:
 Equipment and trucks used for construction shall use the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment redesign, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds);
 Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for construction shall be hydraulically or electrically
Project
Applicant /
Project
Contractor
City of
Richmond
Building
Division and
Engineering
Services
Department
Engineering Services
Department to review and
approve Project specifications
and grading and construction
plans for inclusion of this
measure into specifications.

Building Division to inspect site
during construction to ensure
compliance with Project
construction plans.

Prior to issuance of
building permit.

Field inspections
during construction.

Verified by:

Date:

4.11 Noise (cont.)
 powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools.

Where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to approximately 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools
themselves or similar devices shall be used; this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. Quieter procedures, such as use of drills rather than impact tools, shall be used; and  Stationary noise sources on site shall be located as far from adjacent receptors as may physically be accommodated,
and they shall be muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds incorporate insulation barriers, or include similar measures to reduce noise.

4.12 Population and Housing
None required.

Page 1631 of 1760 ends

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Quarry Residential Project A-9 ESA / D161035
EIR Addendum March 2022
Project Mitigation Measures
Implemented
By Monitored By
Monitoring and Reporting
Action
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification of
Compliance

4.13 Public Services and Recreation
None required.

4.14 Transportation and Traffic
None required.

4.15 Utilities and Service Systems
None required.

Page 1632 of 1760 ends

Blank
This page is intentionally blank.

Page 1633 of 1760 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

1. Substantial Conformance: The Revised Project shall be completed in substantial conformance with the Project Plans in Exhibit A, submitted to and received by the Planning Department on March 1, 2022, except as may be modified by the conditions of approval for the Revised Project.

2. Conditions of Approval on Plans: All conditions of approval shall be printed on the informational page of the final construction plans submitted for building permits, along with annotations by the Applicant of where the conditions have been met on the drawings. All conditions of approval shall be on all grading and construction plans, which shall always be kept on the Project site.

3. Responsibility to Inform: The Applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that all subcontractors, consultants, engineers, or other business entities providing services related to the Revised Project of their responsibilities to comply with the Revised Project contractor and construction crew is aware of and adheres to all conditions of approval.

4. Changes to Design: Prior written approval from the Community Development Director or their designee shall be received by the Applicant before any minor changes are made to the site design, grade, building design, building colors or materials, or related design elements. Major changes shall be subject to review by the DRB or Planning Commission at the Community Development Director’s discretion.

5. Maintenance: The Applicant, shall, at all times, keep the property in good order. This includes repair and maintenance of all structures, fences, signs, walks, driveways, painting, etc. as may be necessary to preserve a high-quality environment. All landscaped areas shall be maintained free of litter, debris, and weeds. All plantings shall be permanently maintained in a healthy growing condition, and whenever necessary, replaced with equivalent planting materials to ensure continued conformance with approved plans. Every sign shall be kept up and maintained in a secure and safe condition. Signs shall be kept free of rust, corrosion, peeling paint, cracks, fading, and other surface deterioration.

6. Composting and Recycling: Consistent with the City’s Climate Action Plan, the Applicant shall have a “three-bin” recycling program (garbage, recycling and compost).

7. Refuse, Recycling and Greenwaste Storage Areas: All solid waste and recycling areas shall comply with locational and design criteria in Section 15.04.601.090 of the Richmond Municipal Code.

8. Transportation Demand Management: The Applicant shall adhere to the transportation demand management program provided in compliance with Section

15.04.612.

Page 1634 of 1760 ends

9. Lighting Standards: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate that all exterior lighting has been designed and located so that all direct light is confined to the property and is satisfactory to the Community Development Director or their designee. Fixtures shall be appropriate to the style and scale of the architecture. No lights shall be greater than 3,000k LED.

10. Inclusionary Housing and Density Bonus Law Requirements: The Revised Project shall comply with Article 15.04.603 of the Zoning Ordinance and requirements of the state Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915). Ten percent (10%) of the units shall be sold at affordable sales price to Moderate-Income households as defined in Zoning Ordinance Section 15.04.104.020 and Health and Safety Code Section(s) 50052.5 and 50093. Prior to issuance of a building permit or approval of a final or tentative parcel map, whichever is earliest, the Applicant shall enter into and record a written agreement with the City as specified in Section 15.04.603.110.

11. Storm Water Management During Construction: During construction activities, the Applicant shall reduce or prevent to the maximum extent practicable the direct or indirect discharge of any dust or pollutant into the store drain system using best management practices contained in the California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook for Construction Activities. Construction activities include but are not limited to: watering operations; roadwork and paving operations; concrete and painting; structure construction; construction material storage and handling; construction waste/debris storage and disposal; and, construction equipment/vehicle cleaning, maintenance and fueling operations. The project sponsor is also responsible for training all contractors and subcontractors on the best management practices identified in the California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook for Construction Activities which shall be made available by the project sponsor at the pre-construct meeting of the project.

12. Encroachment Permit Required: The Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the City’s Engineering Department for all work within the public right-of-way. All curb, gutter, and sidewalk replacement shall conform to City standards. Should any infrastructure be damaged or destroyed as a result of the Revised Project’s construction, Applicant shall be responsible for returning the infrastructure to an acceptable condition as determined by the City’s Public Works Director.

13. All new electrical lines and connections to the site shall be undergrounded to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Development Director.

14. Any relocation of existing improvements or public utilities shall be accomplished under the direction of the City, or impacted utility company’s requirement, at no expense to the City or utility company.

15. The Applicant shall repair all damaged sidewalk, pavement, existing curb and gutter along the project frontage to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director

Page 1635 of 1760 ends

and City Engineer prior to occupancy. The Applicant shall replace any damaged landscaping, improvements, or street improvements caused by the installation of utility services and construction of the project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Development Director.

16. Failure to abide and faithfully comply with any and all conditions attached to this approving action shall constitute grounds for the revocation of said action by the DRB or other design review authority.

17. Turning Radius. Provide turning radius on plans to ensure compliance with Fire Department standards.

18. Design Review Permit Expiration: Design Review approval shall expire when the Tentative Map expires, unless made permanent by issuance of building permits and the commencement of construction. If the use(s) or structure(s) approved by this action are not established within such period of time, this approval shall be terminated and shall, thereafter, be null and void, unless the Applicant applies for an extension of time prior to expiration of the Design Review approval.

19. Indemnification: The Applicant agrees, on behalf of themself, their successor(s)-ininterest and assigns, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Council, DRB, advisory boards, officers, employees, consultants and agents (hereinafter "City") from any claim, action or proceeding (hereinafter "Proceeding") brought against the City to attack, set aside, void or annul the City's actions regarding any development or land use permit, application, license, denial, approval or authorization, including, but not limited to, variances, use permits, developments plans, specific plans, general plan amendments, zoning amendments, approvals and certifications pursuant to CEQA, and/or any mitigation monitoring program, or brought against the City due to acts or omissions in any way connected to the Applicant's Original or Revised Project(s), but excluding any approvals governed by Government Code Section 66474.9. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the City, if any, and costs of suit, attorney’s fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by Applicant or City. If Applicant is required to defend the City as set forth above, the City shall retain the right to select the counsel who shall defend the City.

20. The project shall meet the requirements of Richmond Municipal Code (RMC) Chapter 12.62 by either including on-site publicly accessible art valued at one percent (1%) of the Building Development Cost or by paying an in-lieu contribution of one percent (1%) of the Building Development Cost to the City’s Public Art Project account as set forth in Section 12.62.050. Building Development Cost shall be as defined in the RMC Chapter 12.62.

21. The Applicant shall fund and construct the staging area shown in Miller/Knox Trailhead Improvement Plan sheet L4 of the Project Plans prior to issuance of the

Page 1636 of 1760 ends

last 5 occupancy permits, working in good faith with the East Bay Regional Park District and the City of Richmond.

22. Improvements plans and a subdivision improvement agreement shall be approved by the City prior to the construction of any subdivision improvements.

23. Applicant shall provide proof of an easement agreement or other legal agreement with the EBRPD for the proposed EVA, or the EVA shall be redesigned to be located completely on-site. Applicant shall provide a copy of the draft easement or legal agreement for review by the City Attorney prior to execution.

24. All light fixtures shall be shielded, indirect, dark sky friendly and have output color temperature of no greater than 3,000 Kelvins.

25. Applicant shall repave the existing Bay Trail between the Project site and Canal Boulevard and repair the collapsed Bay Trail section immediately south of the Project site. Bay Trail improvements shall merge seamlessly with the existing Bay Trail lying south and north of the Project site. In addition, Applicant shall construct, or pay the full cost of constructing, a new, paved twelve (12)-foot wide Bay Trail section linking the Condition 21 staging area with the Applicant’s improved Bay Trail along Seacliff Drive and the Bay Trail along Canal Blvd in the vicinity of the access road for 1001 Canal Blvd. A condition shall be included in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement requiring the Applicant to complete these improvements prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the residential project.

26. Applicant shall replace, or salvage and reuse, the Bay Trail orientation sign panel and frame located at the corner of Seacliff Drive and Canal Boulevard. A 2’ x 3’ interpretative panel shall be created and installed in a National Park Service low profile frame along the Bay Trail on Seacliff Drive, prior to issuance of first certificate of occupancy. This new panel location and design shall be done in collaboration with TRAC and be consistent with the design of Bay Trail interpretative panels installed along the Bay Trail in Richmond.

27. Ground water and/or stormwater runoff shall not be allowed to flow from the site across the Bay Trail’s shoulder or pavement.

28. The Bay Trail improvements that Applicant installs adjacent to the Project site frontage shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association or by another Cityapproved funding mechanism, such as contributing funds to a Lighting and Landscaping District, if formed.

29. The following additional traffic safety measures shall be added near the Project site’s entry driveway:
a. A stop sign and a stop pavement marking for vehicles exiting the driveway, and b. Trail crossing signs W11-15 and W11-15P alerting motor vehicles to trail traffic at three (3) locations: (1) the drive exit, (2) before the right turn from southbound Seacliff Drive and (3) at the left turn from northbound Seacliff Drive with W16-7P directional arrow signs added under the trail signs on Seacliff Drive. These signs

Page 1637 of 1760 ends

shall be compliant with the latest edition of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices at the time of permit.

30. Applicant shall pay for and/or install the following improvements to Seacliff Drive:
a. Speed feedback signs in both directions;
b. Striping on both sides of Seacliff Drive to provide three (3)-foot shoulders and 11-foot travel lanes in both directions; and
c. The following signage:
i. 25 miles per hour (mph) speed limit (Sign R2-1) on both directions of Seacliff Drive;
ii. Curve arrows (W1-8) on both directions of Seacliff Drive; and iii. Stop Ahead (W3-1) on northbound Seacliff Drive on the approach to Canal Boulevard; and Intersection Ahead (W2-2) on both directions of Seacliff Drive approaching the Project site driveway.

These improvements shall be installed prior to use of the new entry driveway for construction purposes.

31. The following additional improvements to Seacliff Drive shall be paid for and/or installed by Applicant:
a. Centerline striping on Seacliff Drive: the City standard for providing double-yellow center striping is Caltrans Detail 23 (CA MUTCD 2010), which consists of two rows of reflective and non-reflective yellow markers in the center of the roadway; and,
b. Guardrails (also called traffic barriers) shall be installed at the east side of Seacliff Drive where the roadway curves and has a descending grade in the northbound direction.

32. Street Improvements. Applicant shall have street improvement plans prepared for all work in the public right of way by a licensed civil engineer and obtain Engineering Division approval prior to the issuance of the encroachment permit.

33. Applicant is required to retrofit all existing and new drain inlets and catch basins onsite and adjacent offsite with full-trash capture device per RMC 12.22.090(a). Include detail of the chosen device on plan sheet and indicate the locations where they will be installed (see attached list of approved full trash capture devices). As part of the SWCP the Revised Project shall be listed in the text for the trash inserts within the “Source Control Measures” and Section VI “Stormwater Facility Maintenance” Section of the SWCP.

34. Submit Operations and Maintenance Plan and an O&M Agreement (“Agreement”) per the City’s templates for stormwater quality facilities. After approval of the O&M Plan and Agreement by the Water Resource Recovery (WRR) Department the following shall occur:
a. Property owner must sign and notarize the Agreement first; b. Submission of the Agreement to the City along with a legal description of the property;
c. City officials sign and notarize the Agreement;

Page 1638 of 1760 ends

d. City records the executed Agreement with the County; e. City will provide Property Owner a copy of the recorded Agreement.

35. Applicant shall video all storm and sewer pipes on the property –up to the connection points to the City systems. The videos shall be provided to the WRR Department for review prior to finalizing project utility plan. In addition, video of pipes constructed shall be completed prior to occupancy of the units.

36. Applicant will install a two (2)-way cleanout, overflow protection device, and a backflow device for each unit/connection; and will coordinate number of connections with MEP consultant.

37. Applicant shall comply with minimum storm drain standards set forth in City’s Standard Plans and in the RMC. Documentation provided in support of proposed Storm Drain improvements shall include, but is not limited, to:
a. Applicant shall provide as-built drawing to the City of Richmond ECIP Department for all improvements constructed onsite and off-site as part of the project. The as-built drawings must be stamped by the engineer of record for the project.
b. Applicant shall comply with the City’s Storm drain design standards in RMC Section 15.08.570. Storm Drain Design Criteria shall follow the City of Richmond’s RMC “§12.44.060(f) - Design standards and grading regulations (Regulations for Drainage).

38. The project shall conform to the latest C3 standards and Best Management Practices.

39. Revised Project shall implement the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

40. On Sheet A8.0, crosswalks shall be added at the intersections of B Street and C Street, and B Street and D Street, with a sidewalk added on the north side of B Street, between C and D streets. This is consistent with Sheet C3.1 of the Vesting Tentative Map.

41. Revised Project shall comply with RMC Chapter 9.64, which prohibits use of natural gas infrastructure in newly constructed buildings.

42. Construction Staging area: A construction staging area shall be developed along the existing access road into the former Quarry that is programed to become a trail extension developed as a Class I Bikeway. The Applicant shall secure any required encroachment permits from the City of Richmond and East Bay Regional Park District. In the development of the staging area, the civil engineer and the construction team shall survey the area needed and this area shall be shown on a site plan map. This area shall then have a separate landscape plan that will amend sheet L4 in the Project Plans, dated March 2022. This separate landscape plan shall be adapted to the staging area so following major construction, a plan to remove invasive species and trim overgrowth to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. This landscaping shall be completed prior to the issuance of the

Page 1639 of 1760 ends

certificate of occupancy of the 70th residence in the project. This landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to the application submittal of the 50th building permit. Temporary water and irrigation shall be provided to establish the new plantings.

43. To the extent possible, the project shall avoid construction access off of Seacliff Drive and instead, construction traffic shall be directed to enter and exit onto Canal Blvd from the existing access road that is to become a trail extension as described in Condition 43 above.

44. The staging area and trail as shown on Sheet L4 shall be completed prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the final home in the project. All agreements to construct these improvements shall be completed with the City and EBRPD prior to the issuance of the 30th building permit.

45. Coast live oak specified on Sheet L4 of the Project Plans shall be 24” box in lieu of 15 gallon. All other shrubs shall have a minimum of 5 gallons in lieu of 1 gallon.

46. The project shall install a 1-inch Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) water supply line, valve, and box to the area shown on sheet L4 for future use.

47. The project shall provide a Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe (minimum 2” pipe) to intercept existing storm water and direct it to the area adjacent to unit 43, and west of Unit 17. This area could be used for potential future water storage tanks that may be provided by the homeowner’s association. The future harvesting and re-use of storm water must be completed in accordance with applicable laws.

48. Wooden fences shall be in substantial compliance with the photograph on sheet L5 of the Project Plans and shall be either clear western red cedar, redwood or Ipe. The fences shall comply with the current building code. All fasteners shall be stainless steel or similar to limit corrosion. Fence post bases and fasteners shall be hot-dipped galvanized. All board form gaps shall be ¼”.

49. The Vesting Tentative Map dated March 1, 2022 shall be modified to conform with conditions of approval 43, 44, and 45 above.

50. All Garage doors shall include the optional enhanced glass above. Garage doors shall also be designed with varied panels doors to match architecture patterns.

51. The following elevations: Front 3C, Rear Enhanced 3C, Front 3A, Rear Enhanced 3A, Front 2C, Rear enhanced 2C, Front 2A, Front 1C, and Rear enhanced 1C shall be revised to show the 2 inches window reveals shown on sheet A5.1 # 5, and on note A5.0 # 4 shall be revised to be 2”.

52. All windows shall be bronze color if the building exteriors are darker.

Page 1640 of 1760 ends

53. Downspouts shall be bonderized 26-gauge galvanized sheet metal painted to match adjacent material.

54. Gutters shall be 5-inch fascia-type 26-gauge painted to match the exterior board trim color.

55. Roof vents shall be corrosion resistant.

56. Windows above planters shall open so planters can be used.

57. Enhanced side elevations shall be added to lots 8 side, 58 side, and 65, and rear lots 59, 60, 61, and 62.

58. Solar panels to be installed on all residences.

59. French doors (min. 60-in x 80-in), at the entry side of the garage, shall be offered as an option for buyers.

60. The play area shall be enlarged, by eliminating five (5) of the proposed adjacent parking stalls and incorporating the area into the park.

61. Entry enhancement planting shall be changes to non-invasive species.

62. Staff shall make best efforts to research and discuss with Fire an emergency route as illustrated by Ms. Johnson. Summary shall be noticed and introduced to City council.

63. A marker of the future possible restroom location within the staging area shall be noted on the project plans.

Page 1641 of 1760 ends

1 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
Planned Area Plan
March 2022

INTRODUCTION
The proposed project is an in-fill and reuse housing development of a vacant site formerly used as a rock quarry. The project, commonly known as ‘The Quarry’, is located on approximately 6.3 acres of the

18.4-acre property in the Point Richmond neighborhood of the City of Richmond, Contra Costa County, California (“Project Site”). Based on geotechnical analysis, areas of the proposed project site have been deemed “unbuildable.” Because of these constraints, only 6.3 acres are considered suitable for construction of buildings. The remaining 12.1 acres will remain as open space.

The Planned Area (“PA”) Plan envisions development of up to 76 small lot single family houses, 10% of which will be offered at an affordable sales price to low-income households per Richmond Municipal Code Article 15.04.603, Inclusionary Housing, a “tot lot”, shared open space, landscaped frontage areas, and pathways. The developer will pay a fee to meet the Percent for Art requirement in lieu of placing art on site.

The PA Plan is consistent with the Richmond General Plan (as amended) and other applicable policies, and is compatible with surrounding development. Implementation of the project would require an amendment of the previously approved PA plan or waivers of development standards pursuant to the state Density Bonus Law. The project is compatible with the adjacent uses and would enable application of development standards consistent with the City’s goals in its General Plan, including meeting future housing needs within the PA through infill development already served by community facilities, utilities and transportation systems. Moreover, with the requested waivers of development standards pursuant to the state Density Bonus Law, the project is consistent with applicable, objective provisions of the General Plan and zoning ordinance and is protected by the provisions of the Housing Accountability Act.

Minimum lot areas, setbacks, building heights, other development standards, and similar regulations of the base zoning district may be modified as part of an approved PA district. Most of the proposed development standards are similar to the RM-1, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential district but would allow slight deviations, such as front, side and rear setbacks. See attached pages 6-7 for charts on comparative lot standards and land use regulations

PLAN ELEMENTS
PA Plan elements include residential development with related amenities and improvements to the Bay Trail along the project site frontage.

Residential Uses
The PA Plan includes the development of up to 76 small lot single family houses. The development consists of two-story buildings.

Page 1642 of 1760 ends

2 Amenities
The project includes open space at the middle of the site that contains a small landscaped “tot lot” with play equipment, safety surfacing, picnic tables, trash/recycle receptacles, turf areas and bench seating.

Landscaping and Bay Trail Improvements
The project will include landscaped common areas that will be maintained by the Homeowners Association (“HOA”).

In addition to project landscaping, the project provides enhancements to the section of the Bay Trail on Seacliff Drive along the project site. The trail will be rebuilt as a 12-foot-wide paved trail with 5-7 feet of landscaping (low ground cover planting) between the trail and Seacliff Drive, and 3 feet of decomposed granite between the trail and the landscape leading up to the project buildings.

PROJECT ACCESS AND PARKING
Access will be provided via a private entrance road from Seacliff Drive. An access for emergency vehicles only will also be provided from Seacliff Drive, at the northern corner of the site.

A total of 186 parking spaces will be provided, of which 152 spaces will be in private garages and 34 spaces will be spaces for guests. Two of the guest spaces will be accessible and two will have electric vehicle (EV) charging stations.

UTILITY SERVICES
The City of Richmond currently provides sewer services to properties in the area. Existing sewer systems in the area have sufficient capacity available to serve the project.

The project can be served by the City of Richmond’s existing water treatment plant. The provision of wastewater services would not require major extensions to the existing system to serve the project site.

All existing utilities are located adjacent to the project site and will have to be extended to serve the proposed development. Major extensions will not be required.

PA PLAN
All requirements set forth in the Richmond Municipal Code Article 15.04.810 apply to the project.

Allowable Land Uses
The following permitted and conditional uses are allowed in The Quarry PA District.

Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted. Similar uses may be permitted by interpretation of the Planning Director or his designee.

Residential Uses: Single Family Detached Residential

Page 1643 of 1760 ends

3 Commercial Uses: Home occupations
Open Space and Recreational Uses: Parks, open space, and bike and pedestrian trails Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and buildings shall be limited to those uses that are clearly incidental to the primary use of the property, such as a garden shed or pergola.

Development Standards
The following development standards shall apply in The Quarry PA District.

Residential Unit Types. The following unit types are allowed in The Quarry PA District. • Single Family Detached Residential
Density. The following densities apply to The Quarry PA District.

HOUSING TYPE GROSS ACREAGE NET ACREAGE1 UNIT RANGE2

MINIMUM MAXIMUM
Medium Density
Residential

18.4 ± 6.3 ± 10 du/ac x net
acreage = 63
units
27 du/acre x
net acreage =
170 units 1 Because a large portion of the site is restricted from development due to steepness, project density is calculated based on the developable “net” acreage (6.3 acres). 2 The General Plan Medium Density Residential designation permits 10-27 units/net acre. (General Plan Land Use Element.)
Setbacks and Height. Specific development standards pertaining to maximum building height and minimum setbacks are as follows:

MAXIMUM

BUILDING HEIGHT
(IN FEET)1

FRONT YARD
SETBACK (IN FEET)2

SIDE YARDS (L/R)
SETBACK (IN FEET) 2

REAR YARD SETBACK
(IN FEET) 2
35 5 4/4 8 1 Maximum building height is measured to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof per Richmond Municipal Code Section 15.04.020, Definition 77. 2 Architectural projections of up to 3’-0” are allowed in setbacks, including but not limited to: bay windows, second floor cantilevers, porch and patio columns with roofs, fire places and chimneys, buttressed and finned walls.

Architecture. The residential development shall be constructed in substantial compliance with the final architectural plan set approved by the City Council, including any applicable conditions of approval for The Quarry project.

Open Space Requirements. Common open space shall be provided in substantial compliance with the final landscape plan approved by the City Council, including any applicable conditions of approval for The Quarry project. Specific development standards pertaining to open space are as follows:

Page 1644 of 1760 ends

4 TYPE REQUIREMENT
Common Open
Space
150 SF/DU
Private Open Space 75 SF/DU
Performance Standards. The uses in The Quarry PA District must comply with all applicable performance standards delineated in the Richmond Municipal Code Section 15.04.608.

Parking Standards. Except as otherwise provided in this section, all parking must comply with the provisions of Richmond Municipal Code Article 15.04.607. The project will provide 34 guest parking spaces. Two of the guest spaces will be accessible and two will have electric vehicle (EV) charging stations.

Number of parking spaces. No less than the minimum number of parking spaces, as required by this subsection, shall be provided for residential uses on the site. Off-street parking spaces may be provided in excess of the minimum number of spaces required per this subsection.

Parking Stall Length. For all parking angles more than 30-degrees, the required minimum stall length is 18 feet by 8’-6”.

Landscape. Landscape shall be installed in substantial compliance with the final landscape plan approved by the City Council, including any applicable conditions of approval for The Quarry project.

Signs. All signs must comply with the applicable provisions of the Richmond Municipal Code Section 15.04.609.

EXCEPTIONS - The project is asking for the following waivers of development standards pursuant to the state Density Bonus Law.

Minimum Lot Size - RM zones have a 5,000 sf lot area minimum standard. We are proposing a 2,100 sf minimum. This smaller lot size is necessary to achieve the minimum density of 12 du/acre
Minimum Lot Width - RM zones have a 50’ minimum lot width standard. We are proposing a 34’ minimum width. This narrower width is necessary to achieve the minimum density of 12 du/acre Minimum Front Setback - RM zones have a 10’ minimum front yard setback. We are proposing a 5’ minimum setback. We have smaller lot sizes (to achieve the needed density), and with this smaller lot size it is necessary to have a smaller front setback in order to have a buildable area on the lot that can accommodate the required parking and have adequate ground floor living space
Minimum Interior Side Setback - RM zones have a 5’ minimum interior side yard setback. We are proposing a 4’ minimum setback. We have narrower lot widths (to achieve the needed density),

Page 1645 of 1760 ends

5 and with this smaller width it is necessary to have a smaller side yard setback in order to have a buildable area on the lot that will have adequate ground floor living space Minimum Rear Setback - RM zones have a 20’ minimum rear yard setback. We are proposing a 8’ minimum setback. We have smaller lot sizes (to achieve the needed density), and with this smaller lot size it is necessary to have a smaller rear setback in order to have a buildable area on the lot that can accommodate the required parking and have adequate ground floor living space

IMPLEMENTATION
Approval of The Quarry PA Plan will constitute final discretionary land use approval for The Quarry project site.

PA Plan Amendments
The PA Plan provides a general description of the development of the project site. The project includes a tentative map and design review approvals. Final architectural and landscape design and site planning will occur at the time of design review and no formal amendment of this PA Plan will be required as long as the materials submitted for design review approval are in substantial compliance with this PA Plan.

Amendments to the PA Plan shall be subject to the procedures of Richmond Municipal Code Section 15.04.810.070.

Administrative and Enforcement Procedures:

All activities, development and uses allowed in this PA District are subject to the provisions contained in Richmond Municipal Code Section 15.04.803 (Common Procedures). Provisions of this PA Plan will be enforced in accordance with Municipal Code Section 15.04.815 (Enforcement Provisions).

Page 1646 of 1760 ends

6 COMPARATIVE LOT STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATIONS
District RM1 RM2 PROPOSED
Lot and Density Standards
Density (du/ac) Min. 10; Max 27 Min. 15; Max. 40 12.1
Minimum Lot Area
per Unit (sq. ft.) 1,650 1,100 2,100
Minimum Lot Size
(sq. ft.) 5,000 5,000 2,100
Minimum Lot
Width (ft.) 50 50 34
Building Form and Location
Maximum Height
(ft.)
Main Building 35 (A) 35 (A) 35
Accessory Building 12 (B) 12 (B) 12
Maximum Stories 3 3(C) 2
Minimum Setbacks (ft.)
Front 10 (D) 10 5
Interior Side 5 for the first two stories, 10 thereafter (A) 4 Street Side 10 (E) 10 (E)
Rear 20 20 (A) 8
Parking, from
street facing
property line
40 (F) 40 (F) NA
Minimum Distance
Between Buildings
(ft.)
6 6 8
Maximum Lot
Coverage (% of
Lot)
65 75 65

Page 1647 of 1760 ends

7 COMPARATIVE LOT STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATIONS
Maximum Upper Story Massing (% of Ground Floor Footprint) 2nd Story 100 100
3rd Story and
Above 80 NA
Open Space, Landscaping and Paving
Minimum Private
Open Space (sq. ft.
per unit)
75 60 75
Minimum Total
Open Space (sq. ft.
unit)
150 120 150
Required
additional Open
Space for 3 or
more Bedrooms
(sq. ft. per unit)
100 (common or
private) 100
Minimum Amount
of Landscaping (%
of site)
15 15 15
Maximum Paving
in Street-facing
Yards (% of
required yard)
50 50 50
Accessory Uses
and Structures See Sec. 15.04.601.010 Accessory Uses and Structures

Page 1648 of 1760 ends

THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RICHMOND, CA
KTGY Group, Inc.1814 Franklin St. Suite 400, Oakland, CA 94612 ARCHITECT : CIVIL ENGINEER : LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT : New West Communities 5055 West Patrick Lane #101 Las Vegas, NV 89118 DEVELOPER: CSW/Struber-Stroeh Engineering Group 5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd., Suite 203 Pleasanton, CA 94588 Contact: Terry Manley [email protected]: : (702) 293-9030 Contact: David Burton, AIA [email protected] Contact: Wayne Leach, PE [email protected] Vallier Design Associates,Inc.210 Washington Ave., Suite G Point Richmond, CA 94801 Contact: Marcia Vallier, ASLA, APA, LEED AP [email protected] SHEET INDEX C1.0 TITLE SHEET C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS C3.0 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP C3.1 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP C4.0 GRADING PLAN C5.0 SITE CROSS SECTIONS C6.0 UTILITY PLAN C7.0 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN C8.0 PRELIMINARY PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS L1 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN L2 TYPICAL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT L3 ENLARGEMENT PLAN - ENTRY AND COMMON AREAS L4 ENLARGEMENT PLAN MILLER/KNOX TRAILHEAD PARKING AND IMPROVEMENTS L5 SITE IMAGES L6 LANDSCAPE PLANTS A0.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A1.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A1.1 FLOOR PLAN 1 A1.2 PLAN 1A- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A1.3 PLAN 1B- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A1.4 PLAN 1C- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.1 FLOOR PLAN 2 A2.2 PLAN 2A- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 PLAN 2B- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.4 PLAN 2C- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 FLOOR PLAN 3 A3.2 PLAN 3A- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.3 PLAN 3B- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.4 PLAN 3C- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.0 PLAN 1 SECTION- TYPICAL A5.0 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS A5.1 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS A6.0 COLOR SCHEMES A7.0 STREET SCENE A7.1 STREET SCENE A8.0 PRELIMINARY PLAN & STYLE PLOTTING MARCH 16, 2022 APRIL 2022 Page 1649 of 1760
Date
Project#
Checked
Drawn
Scale
Sheet Description: Rev:
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Suite 203
Pleasanton, California, 94588
http://www.cswst2.com
925.523.4001
C S W S T 2

AS SHOWN
CSE
RS
04/01/22
2130074
Seal & Signature:

Sheet Number: RICHMOND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Date: Description:

C1.0 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT TITLE SHEET
APN: 560-330-043

RICHMOND, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
APRIL, 2022

CITY OF RICHMOND

THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP

RICHMOND

PROJECT
SITE
OCEAN

PACIFIC

SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA NEVADA

LOCATION MAP

NOT TO SCALE
OREGON

CALIFORNIA

DEVELOPER/OWNER

CIVIL ENGINEER

PROJECT INFORMATION

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

NEW WEST COMMUNITIES
5055 WEST PATRICK LANE #101
LAS VEGAS, NV 89118
PHONE: 702-497-0873

CSW/STRUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP
5870 STONERIDGE MALL RD., SUITE 203
PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-787-4982

ARCHITECT
KTGY
1814 FRANKLIN STREET, SUITE 400
OAKLAND, CA 94612
PHONE: 415-568-3833
SITE APN: 560-330-043
TOTAL UNITS: 76 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
SITE AREA: 18.44 AC
GENERAL PLAN: OPEN SPACE AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: OS/PA-OPEN SPACE / PLANNED AREA
LAND USE: EXISTING: VACANT
PROPOSED: OPEN SPACE / MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
UTILITIES:

SEWER CITY OF RICHMOND

WATER EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT

STORM DRAIN CITY OF RICHMOND

GAS/ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

TELEPHONE TBD
FLOOD ZONE: ZONE X
STREETS: ALL ON-SITE STREETS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED.

COMMON AREAS: ALL PRIVATE COMMON AREAS TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA.

RETAINING WALLS: ALL RETAINING WALLS TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA.

PARKING: RESIDENTIAL GARAGES: 76
GUEST SPACES: 29
DIMENSIONS: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO THE FINAL MAP.

ABBREVIATIONS

AC ACRE

AD AREA DRAIN

BC BACK OF CURB

BW BOTTOM OF WALL

DMA DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA

ELEV ELEVATION

EX EXISTING

FF FINISH FLOOR

FH FIRE HYDRANT

FL FLOWLINE

GR GRATE

HP HIGH POINT

INV INVERT

LP LOW POINT

MH MANHOLE

PR PROPOSED

RET RETAINING

R/W RIGHT OF WAY

SD STORM DRAIN

SS SANITARY SEWER

SW SIDEWALK

TC TOP OF CURB

TRC TOP OF ROLLED CURB

TSM TOP OF SOIL MIX

TW TOP OF WALL

TYP TYPICAL

W WATER

WV WATER VALVE
CANAL
BLVD

SEACLIFF
I-580

CUTTING BLVD

PROJECT

LOCATION
DR

HARBOR CHANNEL

SHEET INDEX
SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE
C1.0 TITLE SHEET
C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C3.0 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
C3.1 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
C3.2 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
C4.0 GRADING PLAN
C5.0 SITE CROSS SECTIONS
C6.0 UTILITY PLAN
C7.0 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN
C8.0 PRELIMINARY PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Page 1650 of 1760 ends

LANDS OF EAST BAY

REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
APN 560-330-031
11495 OR 791

LANDS OF KM PHOENIX

HOLDINGS, LLC
APN 560-330-023
2016-18306

LANDS OF SEACLIFF AT POINT

RICHMOND OWNERS ASSOCIATION
2006-0343286

CITY OF RICHMOND
(1986-212374)

LANDS OF RICHMOND
COVE 1, INC. (2009-0018031)
PARCEL 2

1.49± ACRES

CONSERVATION EASEMENT
(2009-0010832)

LANDS OF EAST BAY

REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

LANDS OF EAST BAY

REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

LANDS OF EAST BAY

REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
(2009-0010830)
60' WIDE ACCESS &

UTILITY EASEMENT

SLOPE EASEMENT
(1986-212372
13278 OR 444)

SEACLIFF DRIVE
PIPE

SEACLIFFDRIVE

STORM DRAIN
OUTLET
DITCH

CULVERT
DITCH

CULVERT
PATH

STORM DRAIN
OUTLET

UTILITY POLE

KINDER MORGAN

PETROLEUM PIPELINE

UTILITY POLE

UTILITY PANEL &

ELECTRICAL BOXES

BAY TRAIL

BAYTRAIL

LANDS OF
RICHMOND COVE 1, INC.

PARCEL 1 2016-268916
APN 560-330-043
PARCEL 1

16.95± ACRES
Date
Project#
Checked
Drawn
Scale
Sheet Description: Rev:
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Suite 203
Pleasanton, California, 94588
http://www.cswst2.com
925.523.4001
C S W S T 2

AS SHOWN
CSE
RS
04/01/22
2130074
Seal & Signature:

Sheet Number: RICHMOND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Date: Description:

C2.0 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EXISTING CONDITIONS Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 80 ft.
80 80 160
LEGEND:

BOUNDARY LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT

EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR

EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR

EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE

EXISTING GAS PIPE

EXISTING OVERHEAD LINE

EXISTING SPOT GRADE

EXISTING PAVEMENT

EXISTING BRUSH

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RICHMOND, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL 1:

PARCEL "B" AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP SUBDIVISION MS 764-81, FILED APRIL 1, 1982, BOOK 100 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 23, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDS.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE CITY OF RICHMOND, RECORDED NOVEMBER 25, 1986, BOOK 13278, PAGE 453, SERIES NO. 86-212374, OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT, A CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT, RECORDED JANUARY 22, 2009, INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0010830, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

PARCEL2:

BEING A PORTION OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT FROM ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, RECORDED JANUARY 5, 1982, IN BOOK 10634 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AT PAGE 434, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT A POINT ON A WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL "B" AS SHOWN ON PARCEL PARCEL MAP SUBDIVISION MS 764-81, FILED APRIL 1, 1982, BOOK 100 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 23, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDS, SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF THE COURSE DESIGNATED AS NORTH 01°40'50" WEST THEREON; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL "B", NORTH 01°40'50" WEST, 289.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL "B" NORTH 01°40'50" WEST, 305.43 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL "B", SOUTH 88°19'10" WEST, 249.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15°00'11" EAST, 313.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°19'10" EAST, 177.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

BASIS OF BEARING
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP IS NORTH 30°13'06" WEST BETWEEN TWO FOUND BRASS DISKS IN MONUMENT WELL ON THE CENTERLINE OF CANAL BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED "PARCEL MAP, SUBDIVISION MS-764-81", FILED APRIL 1, 1982 IN BOOK 100 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 23, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDS.

NOTES

1. DISTANCES SHOWN ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF.

2. VERTICAL DATUM IS NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) PER GPS SURVEY. PROJECT BENCHMARK IS THE FOUND 2.5" BRASS DISK IN MONUMETN WELL LOCATED ON CANAL BLVD AS SHWON ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED "PARCEL MAP, SUBDIVISION MS 764-81", FILED APRIL 1, 1982 IN BOOK 100 OF PARCELS MAPS, PAGE 23, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDS. ELEVATION OF SAID PUNCHED DISK BEING 13.2'.

3. TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN WAS PERFORMED BY OTHERS AND AN ADDITIONAL FIELD SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN APRIL OF 2021 TO CONFIRM CONTROL AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON. NO MATERIAL DISCREPANCIES WERE FOUND IN LOCATING MONUMENTS IN APRIL OF 2021 WHILE RETRACING

Page 1651 of 1760 ends

4 STOP
1 2 3 5 6 7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 45
46 47
48 49
51 52
53 54
64 65 66 67 68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 44
50 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63

SEACLIFF DRIVE LANDS OF EAST BAY

REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
APN 560-330-031
11495 OR 791

SEACLIFFDRIVE

LANDS OF KM PHOENIX

HOLDINGS, LLC
APN 560-330-023
2016-18306

LANDS OF SEACLIFF AT POINT

RICHMOND OWNERS ASSOCIATION
2006-0343286

CITY OF RICHMOND
(1986-212374)
LANDS OF RICHMOND COVE 1, INC.

PARCEL 2 (2009-0018031)

CONSERVATION EASEMENT
(2009-0010832)

LANDS OF EAST BAY

REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

LANDS OF EAST BAY

REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

LANDS OF EAST BAY REGIONAL
PARK DISTRICT (2009-0010830)
60' WIDE ACCESS &

UTILITY EASEMENT

FUTURE STAGING

AREA BY OTHERS

CANAL BLVD CANAL BLVD

SLOPE EASEMENT
(1986-212372
13278 OR 444)
80' WIDE TEMPORARY

CONSTRUCTION, GRADING,

AND SLOPE EASEMENT
80' SOIL NAIL

WALL EASEMENT

PARCEL A

PARCEL B

PARCEL C

PARCEL D

PARCEL F
PROPOSED E.V.A.

EASEMENT AREA

PARCEL E

PROPOSED BAY TRAIL

CONNECTION

RE-PAVE EXISTING
BAY TRAIL, TYP.

PARCEL G
Date
Project#
Checked
Drawn
Scale
Sheet Description: Rev:
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Suite 203
Pleasanton, California, 94588
http://www.cswst2.com
925.523.4001
C S W S T 2

AS SHOWN
CSE
RS
04/01/22
2130074
Seal & Signature:

Sheet Number: RICHMOND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Date: Description:

C3.0 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT VESTING TENTATIVE MAP Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 80 ft.
80 80 160
LEGEND:

BOUNDARY LINE

LOT LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT

PROPOSED EASEMENT

RIGHT OF WAY

Page 1652 of 1760 ends

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 45
46 47
48 49
51 52
53 54
64 65
66 67
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 44
50 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
26' 24'
24'
24'
24'
24'
24'

A STREET

B STREET

B STREET C STREET

D STREET MAIN ENTRY

SEACLIFF DRIVE

SEACLIFF DRIVE
PROPOASED E.V.A.

EASEMENT AREA
(AREA = 6,221 SF)
EVA
ROAD

LANDS OF EAST BAY

REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
APN 560-330-031
11495 OR 791 LANDS OF KM PHOENIX HOLDINGS, LLC APN 560-330-023 2016-18306 34' R/W
34' R/W
34' R/W
34' R/W
34' R/W 34' R/W52' R/W

PARCEL A

PARCEL B

PARCEL C

PARCEL D

PARCEL F
10' STORM DRAIN

EASEMENT
10' STORM DRAIN

EASEMENT
10' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT

PARCEL E

RE-PAVE EXISTING
BAY TRAIL, TYP.

FUTURE STAGING AREA CONNECTION,
SEE SHEET C3.0
24'
36' R/W

PARCEL G
3 STALLS
3 STALLS
4 STALLS
9 STALLS
10 STALLS

PLAY AREA
4' 4' 8' 62'
34'
R/W
TRC
4' 4' 10' 62'
34'
R/W
TRC
4' 4' 8' 62'
34'
R/W
TRC 10' 5' 5' 5'
PLAN 1
(1,143 SF) PLAN 2
(1,120 SF)
PLAN 3
(1,154 SF) 10'
Date
Project#
Checked
Drawn
Scale
Sheet Description: Rev:
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Suite 203
Pleasanton, California, 94588
http://www.cswst2.com
925.523.4001
C S W S T 2

AS SHOWN
CSE
RS
04/01/22
2130074
Seal & Signature:

Sheet Number: RICHMOND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Date: Description:

C3.1 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT VESTING TENTATIVE MAP Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 40 ft.
40 40 80

TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT
SCALE: 1" = 20'
LEGEND:

BOUNDARY LINE

RIGHT OF WAY

LOT LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT

PROPOSED EASEMENT

PROPOSED CURB & SIDEWALK

PROPOSED WALL

PROPOSED BIORETENTION AREA

PROPOSED PAVEMENT
NOTES:

TYPICAL LOT AREA: 2,108 SF
FRONT SETBACK: 5'
SIDE SETBACK: 4'
REAR SETBACK: 8'

Page 1653 of 1760 ends

26' 24'
24'
24'
24'
24'
24'

A STREET

B STREET

B STREET C STREET

D STREET MAIN ENTRY

SEACLIFF DRIVE

SEACLIFF DRIVE
EVA
ROAD LANDS OF KM PHOENIX HOLDINGS, LLC APN 560-330-023 2016-18306 34' R/W
34' R/W
34' R/W
34' R/W
34' R/W 34' R/W52' R/W

PARCEL A

PARCEL B
9,154 SF

PARCEL C

PARCEL D

PARCEL F
PARCEL E 1,948 SF

RE-PAVE EXISTING
BAY TRAIL, TYP.

RE-PAVE EXISTING
BAY TRAIL, TYP.
24'
9'
91'
39'
60'
43'
62'
34'
62'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
40'
40'
64'
32'
45'
62'
34'
62'
34'
62'
34'
34' 62'
34'
34' 62'
34'
34' 62'
34'
34' 62'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
40'
40'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
62' 34' 34'
62' 34' 34'
62' 34' 34'
62' 34' 34'
62'
62'
34' 62'
34' 62'
34' 62'
34'
34' 62'
34'
34' 62'
34'
34' 62'
34'
34' 62'
34'
34' 62'
34'
40' 62'
63' 62'
37'
62'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
34'
62'
34'
62'
34'
34'
62'
33'
62'
34'
34'
62'
62'
39'
33'
62'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34' 33'
1' 64'
34' 34'
63'
62' 34' 34'
62' 34' 34'
62' 34' 34'
62' 35' 36'
62' 38'62' 34'
62' 34'
62' 34'
62' 34'
25'
23' 54' 34'
70'
35' 34'
62' 34' 34'
62' 34'
59'
31' 64'
34'
65'
34' 63'
34'
34' 62'
34'
34'
34'
34'
34'
62'
34'
34'
34'
38'
52'
34'
34'
45'
32'
33'
44'
41' 33'
40' 35'
56'
64'
3,081 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,480 SF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 45
46 47
48 49
51 52
53 54
64 65
66 67
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 44
50 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
2,108 SF
2,450 SF
2,136 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,398 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,480 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,395 SF
2,068 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,346 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,146 SF
2,108 SF 2,108 SF 2,108 SF 2,108 SF 2,108 SF 2,108 SF 2,108 SF 2,480 SF 2,209 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,147 SF
2,113 SF
2,299 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,375 SF
2,236 SF
2,097 SF
2,108 SF
2,126 SF
2,161 SF
2,197 SF
2,797 SF
2,819 SF
2,116 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,223 SF
2,108 SF
2,109 SF
2,225 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
2,108 SF
7,410 SF
10,606 SF
3,796 SF
2,428 SF

PARCEL G
7,410 SF
19'
12'
54' 5'
56'
62' 20'
2,075 SF
9'8' 39'
14'
36' 26' 19' 5'
519,848 SF
Date
Project#
Checked
Drawn
Scale
Sheet Description: Rev:
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Suite 203
Pleasanton, California, 94588
http://www.cswst2.com
925.523.4001
C S W S T 2

AS SHOWN
CSE
RS
04/01/22
2130074
Seal & Signature:

Sheet Number: RICHMOND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Date: Description:

C3.2 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT VESTING TENTATIVE MAP Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 40 ft.
40 40 80
LEGEND:

BOUNDARY LINE

RIGHT OF WAY

LOT LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT

PROPOSED EASEMENT

PROPOSED CURB & SIDEWALK

PROPOSED WALL

PROPOSED BIORETENTION AREA

PROPOSED PAVEMENT

SUMMARY OF LOT COVERAGE
LOT NO. PLAN NO. LOT AREA
(SF)

BUILDING

FOOTPRINT
(SF)
LOT

COVERAGE
1 3 2,108 1,154 55%
2 2 2,108 1,120 53%
3 1 2,108 1,143 54%
4 3 2,108 1,154 55%
5 2 2,108 1,120 53%
6 1 2,108 1,143 54%
7 2 2,108 1,120 53%
8 3 2,480 1,154 47%
9 2 2,146 1,120 52%
10 1 2,108 1,143 54%
11 3 2,108 1,154 55%
12 2 2,108 1,120 53%
13 1 2,108 1,143 54%
14 3 2,346 1,154 49%
15 2 2,108 1,120 53%
16 1 2,108 1,143 54%
17 3 2,068 1,154 56%
18 3 3,081 1,154 37%
19 1 2,108 1,143 54%
20 2 2,108 1,120 53%
21 3 2,108 1,154 55%
22 1 2,108 1,143 54%
23 2 2,480 1,120 45%
24 3 2,108 1,154 55%
25 1 2,450 1,143 47%
26 2 2,136 1,120 52%
27 3 2,108 1,154 55%
28 1 2,108 1,143 54%
29 2 2,108 1,120 53%
30 2 2,108 1,120 53%
31 3 2,398 1,154 48%
32 1 2,108 1,143 54%
33 2 2,108 1,120 53%
34 3 2,108 1,154 55%
35 2 2,108 1,120 53%
36 1 2,108 1,143 54%
37 2 2,480 1,120 45%
38 3 2,108 1,154 55%
39 1 2,108 1,143 54%
40 2 2,108 1,120 53%
41 3 2,108 1,154 55%
42 2 2,108 1,120 53%
43 2 2,395 1,120 47%
44 1 2,147 1,143 53%
45 2 2,113 1,120 53%
46 3 2,108 1,154 55%
47 2 2,108 1,120 53%
48 2 2,108 1,120 53%
49 3 2,209 1,154 52%
50 3 2,075 1,154 56%
51 3 2,108 1,154 55%
52 2 2,108 1,120 53%
53 1 2,108 1,143 54%
54 2 2,299 1,120 49%
55 1 2,375 1,143 48%
56 3 2,236 1,154 52%
57 1 2,108 1,143 54%
58 3 2,097 1,154 55%
59 2 2,797 1,120 40%
60 1 2,197 1,143 52%
61 2 2,161 1,120 52%
62 1 2,126 1,143 54%
63 3 2,819 1,154 41%
64 1 2,116 1,143 54%
65 2 2,108 1,120 53%
66 3 2,108 1,154 55%
67 1 2,108 1,143 54%
68 2 2,108 1,120 53%
69 3 2,108 1,154 55%
70 1 2,223 1,143 51%
71 2 2,108 1,120 53%
72 3 2,109 1,154 55%
73 1 2,225 1,143 51%
74 2 2,108 1,120 53%
75 1 2,108 1,143 54%
76 2 2,108 1,120 53%

SUMMARY OF REMNANT COVERAGE

LOT NAME PLAN AREA (SF)
STREET 82,125
PARCEL A 7,410
PARCEL B 9,154
PARCEL C 10,606
PARCEL D 3,796
PARCEL E 1,948
PARCEL F 2,428
PARCEL G 519,848

TOTAL AREA
LOT COVERAGE 165,968 SF
REMNANT COVERAGE 637,315 SF
TOTAL 803,283 SF (18.44 AC)

Page 1654 of 1760 ends

2.0%
TSM 39.8
TSM 39.5
TW 52.0
BW 50.6
TW 69.0
BW 51.5
TW 54.0
BW 52.3
TW 54.0
BW 52.6
TW 60.0
BW 52.6
TW 50.0
BW 50.0
TW 52.0
BW 52.0
TW 56.0
BW 51.2
TW 57.0
BW 50.0
TW 57.0
BW 48.7
TW 60.0
BW 51.4
TW 51.2
BW 50.0
TW 49.9
BW 39.5 TW 45.1
BW 39.8
TW 53.0
BW 51.0
TW 61.7
BW 51.7
TW 52.0
BW 45.5
TW 34.5
BW 30.5
TW 50.0
BW 37.5

2.0% 2.0% 2.0%

1.5%

1.0%

2.4%

1.0% 14.0%

48.8 45.6 43.9
HP 51.9
HP 49.4
LP 47.0
GB 47.1

49.6 49.1

49.7 GB 42.6
FF 50.9
PAD 49.9
FF 50.2
PAD 49.2
FF 49.5
PAD 48.5
FF 48.9
PAD 47.9
FF 48.2
PAD 47.2
FF 47.5
PAD 46.5
FF 46.8
PAD 45.8
FF 46.1
PAD 45.1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 45
46 47
48 49
51 52
53 54
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
FF 46.1
PAD 45.1
FF 47.4
PAD 46.4 FF 48.2
PAD 47.2 FF 48.8
PAD 47.8 FF 49.1
PAD 48.1 FF 49.5
PAD 48.5 FF 49.8
PAD 48.8 FF 50.1
PAD 49.1 FF 50.5
PAD 49.5 FF 50.9
PAD 49.9
FF 51.2
PAD 50.2
FF 51.6
PAD 50.6
FF 52.0
PAD 51.0
FF 52.3
PAD 51.3
FF 51.6
PAD 50.6
FF 51.9
PAD 50.9
FF 52.5
PAD 51.5
FF 53.2
PAD 52.2
FF 53.3
PAD 52.3
FF 52.6
PAD 51.6
FF 52.5
PAD 51.5
FF 51.5
PAD 50.5
FF 51.8
PAD 50.8
FF 51.0
PAD 50.0
FF 51.6
PAD 50.6
FF 52.3
PAD 51.3
FF 53.0
PAD 52.0
FF 52.6
PAD 51.6
FF 52.0
PAD 51.0
FF 49.7
PAD 48.7
FF 50.1
PAD 49.1
FF 49.1
PAD 48.1
FF 48.5
PAD 47.5
FF 47.9
PAD 46.9
FF 47.3
PAD 46.3
FF 47.7
PAD 46.7
FF 48.3
PAD 47.3
FF 49.7
PAD 48.7
FF 49.4
PAD 48.4
FF 49.0
PAD 48.0
FF 48.7
PAD 47.7
FF 53.0
PAD 52.0
FF 52.5
PAD 51.5
FF 52.2
PAD 51.2
FF 51.8
PAD 50.8
FF 51.5
PAD 50.5
FF 51.1
PAD 50.1
FF 50.7
PAD 49.7
FF 50.6
PAD 49.6
FF 50.6
PAD 49.6
FF 50.9
PAD 49.9
FF 51.2
PAD 50.2
FF 50.9
PAD 49.9
FF 50.5
PAD 49.5
FF 50.2
PAD 49.2
FF 49.9
PAD 48.9
FF 49.6
PAD 48.6
FF 49.2
PAD 48.2
FF 49.2
PAD 48.2
FF 49.2
PAD 48.2
FF 49.5
PAD 48.5
FF 49.9
PAD 48.9
FF 50.2
PAD 49.2
FF 50.6
PAD 49.6
FF 50.9
PAD 49.9
FF 51.3
PAD 50.3
FF 51.6
PAD 50.6
3:1 MAX
3:1 MAX

14.0%
TW 45.1
BW 39.5
TW 49.9
BW 48.9
TW 49.5
BW 39.8

SEACLIFF DRIVE

SEACLIFF

SOIL NAIL WALL & DEBRIS FENCE
PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (TYP.)

SOIL NAIL WALL

RETAINING WALL
RETAINING WALL 1.8%
A
C5.0
B
C5.0
D
C5.0
D
C5.0
E
C5.0
I
C5.0
H
C5.0
G
C5.0

DAYLIGHT

TO EXISTING

DAYLIGHT

TO EXISTING
80' SOIL NAIL

EASEMENT
80' GRADING EASEMENT

THRU-CURB

SLOT DRAIN

EXISTING KINDER MORGAN

PETROLEUM PIPELINE
TW 40.5
BW 34.3
TW 40.5
BW 35.3 TW 40.8
BW 34.0
C
C5.0
F
C5.0
DRIVE

1.0%
LP 48.4 44
50 55
FF 48.9
PAD 47.9
Date
Project#
Checked
Drawn
Scale
Sheet Description: Rev:
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Suite 203
Pleasanton, California, 94588
http://www.cswst2.com
925.523.4001
C S W S T 2

AS SHOWN
CSE
RS
04/01/22
2130074
Seal & Signature:

Sheet Number: RICHMOND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Date: Description:

C4.0 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT GRADING PLAN
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 40 ft.
40 40 80
HP
HP
HP
HP
HP
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD

R/W TRC

5.0' 0.835'
TEE FITTING 12" PVC PIPE 3' MIN
S=0.0050
MIN

TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE DETAIL

NOT TO SCALE

BLIND CONNECTION,

SEE DETAIL 'A' LEFT
4" PVC

RIGHT OF
WAY
12" PVC PIPE
S=0.0050 MIN

CURB & SIDEWALK

PER PLANS

PLAN VIEW

DETAIL 'A'
LEGEND:

BOUNDARY LINE

LOT LINE

PROPOSED CURB & SIDEWALK

PROPOSED WALL

PROPOSED BIORETENTION AREA

PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR

PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR

EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR

EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
SD

PROPOSED CURB INLET

PROPOSED FIELD INLET

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

SPOT GRADE

SLOPE ARROW

45.0 1.0%

PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK
CUT: 9,000 CY
FILL: 52,400 CY
NET FILL: 43,400 CY
PAD

Page 1655 of 1760 ends

Date
Project#
Checked
Drawn
Scale
Sheet Description: Rev:
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Suite 203
Pleasanton, California, 94588
http://www.cswst2.com
925.523.4001
C S W S T 2

AS SHOWN
CSE
RS
04/01/22
2130074
Seal & Signature:

Sheet Number: RICHMOND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Date: Description:

C5.0 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT SITE CROSS SECTIONS

SECTION A

NOT TO SCALE

2.0%
BNDY

14.0'±
TC
4:1 MAX 7.4' MAX

RET WALL

A STREET

SECTION B

NOT TO SCALE
BNDY 17.5' MAX

RET WALL
(NO BATTER)
PAD

SECTION D

NOT TO SCALE
PL 8.8' MAX

RET WALL
PAD

12.0'

DEBRIS BENCH
5' DEBRIS FENCE

24.0' EVA ROAD
TC TC 12.5' MAX

2.0%

SECTION E

NOT TO SCALE

PL BNDY
PAD

SEACLIFF
DRIVE
3:1 MAX
VARIES

2.0'

BIORETENTION
VARIES

SECTION G

NOT TO SCALE
FENCE 9.7' MAX
EXISTING 8" GAS LINE
12:1
12:1
12:1
12:1

RET WALL

PL BNDY
PAD

SEACLIFF
DRIVE
3:1 MAX

17.9'±

BIORETENTION
VARIES

SECTION H

NOT TO SCALE
FENCE 10.4' MAX
EXISTING 8" GAS LINE
12:1

RET WALL
PAD
FENCE
PL
3:1 MAX
PAD
FENCE
PL
3:1 MAX

RET WALL
4' MAX

5.0' 26.0' MAIN ENTRY
SW

5.0'
SW

12.5'± 12.5'±
TC TC
CL

13.0' 13.0'

2.0% 2.0%

SECTION I

NOT TO SCALE

TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL

STREET SECTION

NOT TO SCALE

24.0'
CL

12.0' 12.0'

5.0'
SW

TRC TRC

2.0% 2.0%

SPILL ROLLED CURB CATCH ROLLED CURB

SECTION D
(ALTERNATE)

NOT TO SCALE
EG
EG
EG
EG
2' DRAINAGE

CHANNEL
PL 6.6' MAX

RET WALL
PAD

8.0'
DEBRIS
BENCH
5' DEBRIS FENCE
12:1
EG
2' DRAINAGE

CHANNEL
EG

6.0'

2.0%
EG
2:1
2:1

R/W R/W R/W R/W
2' DRAINAGE

CHANNEL
FENCE
PAD
PL
EG
EG
3:1
MAX

4.0' 2.0'

2.0'

SECTION C

NOT TO SCALE

FL DITCH
PAD

SEACLIFF
DRIVE
3:1 MAX
VARIES 12.0'

BAY TRAIL

SECTION F

NOT TO SCALE
EXISTING 8" GAS LINE
BNDY
FENCE
PL

10.0'± 3.0' 5.0'-7.0'

SHOULDER

12.0'

BAY TRAIL

3.0' 5.0'-7.0'

SHOULDER

12.0'

BAY TRAIL

3.0' 5.0'-7.0'

DECOMPOSED GARNITE

SHOULDER

Page 1656 of 1760 ends

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 45
46 47
48 49
51 52
53 54
64 65
66 67
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 44
50 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS

SS SS SS
SS
W CSD
W
W
W
CSD
W
W
W
W
W

CSD CSD
CSD
CSD
SD

SD SD SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD

SD SDSD
SS
SS
CSD
CSD

CONNECT TO EXISTING

STORM DRAIN

CONNECT TO EXISTING

STORM DRAIN

CONNECT TO EXISTING

STORM DRAIN

10.0' STORM DRAIN

EASEMENT

10.0' STORM DRAIN

EASEMENT

10.0' STORM DRAIN

EASEMENT

10.0' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT

CONTINUE TO CANAL BLVD TO

CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY

SEWER AND WATER PIPES
SS
Date
Project#
Checked
Drawn
Scale
Sheet Description: Rev:
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Suite 203
Pleasanton, California, 94588
http://www.cswst2.com
925.523.4001
C S W S T 2

AS SHOWN
CSE
RS
04/01/22
2130074
Seal & Signature:

Sheet Number: RICHMOND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Date: Description:

C6.0 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT UTILITY PLAN
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 40 ft.
40 40 80
LEGEND:

CSD CLEAN STORM DRAIN PIPE

SD STORM DRAIN PIPE

SS SANITARY SEWER PIPE

W WATER PIPE
18''SD
8''G

OH OH OH

EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE

EXISTING GAS PIPE

EXISTING OVERHEAD LINE
SS
SD

STORM DRAIN CURB INLET

STORM DRAIN FIELD INLET

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

FIRE HYDRANT

BLOWOFF

WATER VALVE

JOINT TRENCH LINE

TYPICAL UTILITY LAYOUT

NOT TO SCALE

CL R/W R/W

6.0' 6.0'

11.17' 11.17'

5.0' 12.0' 12.0' 5.0'

TRC TRC

2.5'
JT
SD
W
SS
CSD

5.17'
SD

TRANSFORMER

Page 1657 of 1760 ends

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 45
46 47
48 49
51 52
53 54
64 65
66 67
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 44
50 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
CSD

CSD CSD
CSD
CSD
SD

SD SD SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD

SD SDSD
CSD

CSD CSD
SD
SD CSD
DMA 1
DMA 2 DMA 3 DMA 4
IMP 1
IMP 2
IMP 3 IMP 4
Date
Project#
Checked
Drawn
Scale
Sheet Description: Rev:
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Suite 203
Pleasanton, California, 94588
http://www.cswst2.com
925.523.4001
C S W S T 2

AS SHOWN
CSE
RS
04/01/22
2130074
Seal & Signature:

Sheet Number: RICHMOND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Date: Description:

C7.0 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 40 ft.
40 40 80

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TABLE

DMA TOTAL AREA (SF)

IMPERIOUS

AREA (SF)

PERVIOUS

AREA (SF)

EFFECTIVE

IMPERVIOUS

AREA (SF)

REQUIRED

TREATMENT

AREA (SF)

TREATMENT

AREA PROVIDED
(SF)
1 138,500 110,800 27,700 113,570 4,543 4,560
2 131,900 105,520 26,380 108,158 4,326 4,590
3 4,725 3,780 945 3,875 155 190
4 3,670 2,936 734 3,009 120 180
ASSUMPTIONS:

1. ON-SITE DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREAS ARE
ASSUMED TO BE 80% IMPERVIOUS.

2. REQUIRED TREATMENT AREA DETERMINED USING
4% METHOD.

LEGEND:

CSD CLEAN STORM DRAIN PIPE

SD STORM DRAIN PIPE
SD

STORM DRAIN CURB INLET

STORM DRAIN FIELD INLET

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

DMA BOUNDARY

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
NOTES:

1. SCARIFY SUBGRADE BEFORE INSTALLING BIORETENTION AREA AGGREGATE AND BIORETENTION SOIL MEDIA.

2. COMPACT EACH 6" LIFT OF BIORETENTION SOIL MEDIA WITH LANDSCAPE ROLLER OR BY LIGHTLY WETTING. IF WETTING, LET DRY OVERNIGHT BEFORE PLANTING.

3. NEVER WORK WITHIN BIORETENTION AREA LIMITS DURING RAIN OR UNDER WET CONDITIONS.

4. KEEP ALL HEAVY MACHINERY OUTSIDE BIORETENTION AREA LIMITS.

5. BIORETENTION IS NOT DESIGNED FOR PERCOLATION. WATER WILL BE DIRECTED TO STORM DRAIN OUTLET PIPE THROUGH 4"
PERFORATED PIPE.

TSM
LIMIT OF BIORETENTION AREA 8"6"
CLEANOUT 18" MIN 12" MIN

BIORETENTION SOIL
12" MIN CLASS II DRAIN ROCK 4" PERFORATED PIPE

OUTLET PIPE

CONCRETE DROP INLET WITH
FRAME. ATRIUM OR BEEHIVE
GRATE PREFERRED; 1
4 " OPENINGS

RETAINING WALL

TYPICAL BIORETENTION DETAIL

NOT TO SCALE

Page 1658 of 1760 ends

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
45 46
47 48
49 51
52 53
54 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
44 50
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 Date
Project#
Checked
Drawn
Scale
Sheet Description: Rev:
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Suite 203
Pleasanton, California, 94588
http://www.cswst2.com
925.523.4001
C S W S T 2

AS SHOWN
CSE
RS
04/01/22
2130074
Seal & Signature:

Sheet Number: RICHMOND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Date: Description:

C8.0 THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT PRELIMINARY PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS Graphic Scale (in feet) 0
1 inch = 40 ft.
40 40 80
SELUX SATURN 1 LED POLE MOUNTED LIGHT
LEGEND:

Page 1659 of 1760 ends

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 45
46 47
48 49
51 52
53 54
64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76
44 50
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 120" VALLIER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 121 PARK PLACE POINT RICHMOND, CA 94801 TELEPHONE 510.237.7745 RICHMOND, CA # 2016-0536 0 20 40 80 L1 THE QUARRY ROCK TEXTURE SOIL NAIL RETAINING WALL TOPPED WITH WIRE DEBRIS FENCE, S.C.D. APRIL 2022 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING SEE SHEET L2 FOR ENLARGEMENT PLAN TYPICAL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT SEE SHEET L2 FOR ENLARGEMENT PLAN COMMON AREAS SEE SHEET L3 FOR ENLARGEMENT PLAN DISTURBED AREAS OF THE HILLSIDE PLANTED WITH NATIVE OAKS AND HYDROSEEDED WITH NATIVE BUCKWHEAT, GRASSES, AND COASTAL SCRUB VEGETATION COMMUNITY MAILBOXES 5'-0" WIDE CONCRETE WALKWAY GATED EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ROAD STORM WATER TREATMENT AREA WITH BOARD FORM CONCRETE RETAINING WALLS PLANTED WITH STORM WATER TOLERANT TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES AND CLINGING VINES. WALL HEIGHT VARIES, S.C.D. NO-MOW FESCUE AND CALIFORNIA BUCKWHEAT HYDROSEEDED WITH COAST LIVE OAK TREES AND DRIFTS OF EVERGREEN NATIVE SHRUBS. 12-0" WIDE ASPHALT BAY TRAIL WITH 3'-0" DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHOULDER SEPARATED FROM STREET BY A PLANTING STRIP OF LOW EVERGREEN GROUND COVER. SEACLIFF DRIVE 6'-0" TALL HORIZONTAL WOOD PROPERTY LINE FENCING AND GATES SERVICE ACCESS ROAD SEEDED WITH NO-MOW GRASS WITH TURF RINGS FLOWERING ACCENT TREES AND SHRUBS LINE ENTRY ROAD AND EVERGREEN SHRUBS SCREEN WALLS AND FENCING EXISTING STREET LIGHT TO REMAIN. SEE SHEET L4 FOR EBRPD CONNECTION RETAINING WALL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SCATTERED BOULDERS AT ENTRY PLANTED WITH DRIFTS OF TALL NATIVE GRASSES COLORED STAMPED ASPHALT PAVING AND CROSS WALK GUEST PARKING COMMON AREA WITH TURF, PLAY AREA, PICNIC TABLES, BARBEQUE GRILL, BENCHES AND TRASH/RECYCLE RECEPTACLES . COMMUNITY GARDEN WITHIN 6'-0" HIGH WOOD AND WIRE FENCE, ACCESSIBLE 4'-0" WIDE WOODEN RAISED BEDS, COMPOST BINS AND STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING Page 1660 of 1760 VALLIER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 121 PARK PLACE POINT RICHMOND, CA 94801 TELEPHONE 510.237.7745 RICHMOND, CA # 2016-0536 0 5 10 20 L2 THE QUARRY APRIL 2022 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING DROUGHT TOLERANT TURF COMMON AREA ORNAMENTAL STREET TREE EVERGREEN GROUND COVER GUEST PARKING BENCH AND TRASH/ RECYCLE RECEPTACLE ORNAMENTAL EVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUBS ALONG FENCE TO BUFFER RESIDENTS SELUX SATURN 1 LED POLE MOUNTED LIGHT WITH DARK SKY CUT OFF LENS, 3,000 MAX. SEE SHEET C8.0 SCALE: 1"=10'-0" COMMON AREA ENLARGEMENT PLAN SCALE: 1"=10'-0" TYPICAL UNIT FRONT LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN SELUX SATURN 1 LED POLE MOUNTED LIGHT WITH DARK SKY CUT OFF LENS, 3,000 MAX. SEE SHEET C8.0 SHARED WALK FROM GARAGES FOR SIDE DOOR ACCESS EVERGREEN GRASS OR ACCENT PLANT COLUNMAR ACCENT SHRUB AT GARAGE DOORS ORNAMENTAL TREE WITH EVERGREEN SHRUB BELOW STREET TREE SIDEWALK PLAN 1 PLAN 2R PLAN 3 PLAN 2R 6'-0" TALL HORIZONTAL WOOD PROPERTY LINE FENCING AND GATES 44 ENLARGEMENT PLAN - TYPICAL UNIT AND COMMON AREA LANDSCAPE PLANS TRELLIS Page 1661 of 1760 4 5 6 7 8 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 51525354 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 55565758 59 60 61 62 63 120" VALLIER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 121 PARK PLACE POINT RICHMOND, CA 94801 TELEPHONE 510.237.7745 RICHMOND, CA # 2016-0536 0 10 20 40 L3 THE QUARRY APRIL 2022 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HILLSIDE PLANTED WITH NATIVE OAKS AND HYDROSEEDED WITH NATIVE BUCKWHEAT, GRASSES, AND COASTAL SCRUB VEGETATION. RETAINING WALL TOPPED WITH WIRE DEBRIS FENCE, S.C.D. GUEST PARKING WITH TWO ACCESSIBLE STALLS AND TWO ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS (EV) SELUX SATURN 1 LED POLE MOUNTED LIGHT WITH DARK SKY CUT OFF LENS, 3,000 MAX. SEE SHEET C8.0 6'-0" TALL HORIZONTAL WOOD PROPERTY LINE FENCING AND GATES STORM WATER TREATMENT AREA WITHIN BOARD FORM CONCRETE RETAINING WALLS PLANTED WITH STORM WATER TOLERANT TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES AND CLINGING VINES. WALL HEIGHT VARIES, S.C.D. NO-MOW FESCUE AND CALIFORNIA BUCKWHEAT HYDROSEEDED WITH COAST LIVE OAK TREES AND DRIFTS OF EVERGREEN NATIVE SHRUBS 12'-0" ASPHALT BAY TRAIL WITH 3'-0" DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHOULDER SEPARATED FROM STREET BY A PLANTING STRIP OF LOW EVERGREEN GROUND COVER. BAY TRAIL CROSSING SIGN (TYP.) ALERTING VEHICLES TO TRAIL TRAFFIC LOCATED AT THE PROJECT EXIT DRIVE, PRIOR TO THE SOUTHBOUND RIGHT TURN INTO THE PROJECT ENTRANCE DRIVE AND PRIOR TO THE NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN INTO THE PROJECT ENTRANCE DRIVE. BAY TRAIL CROSSING AT PROJECT ENTRY WITH HIGH VISIBILITY LADDER STRIPED PAVEMENT WITH A GREEN COLORED CENTER AREA AND CURB CUTS AND TRUNCATED DOMES THE FULL WIDTH OF THE TRAIL. LARGE BAY TRAIL LOGO SIGNS (18"x18") TO BE LOCATED AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE TRAIL AT THE SIDEWALK AND EXIT DRIVE TO IDENTIFY THE TRAIL ENTRANCE AND CROSSING. SEACLIFF DRIVE FLOWERING ACCENT TREES AND SHRUBS LINE ENTRY ROAD AND EVERGREEN SHRUBS SCREEN WALLS AND FENCING EXISTING STREET LIGHT TO REMAIN. ENLARGEMENT PLAN - ENTRY AND COMMON AREAS SCATTERED BOULDERS AT ENTRY PLANTED WITH DRIFTS OF TALL NATIVE GRASSES COLORED , STAMPED ASPHALT CROSS WALK MAINTENANCE ACCESS AREA COMMUNITY MAILBOXES COMMUNITY GARDEN WITHIN 6'-0" HIGH WOOD AND WIRE FENCE,ACCESSIBLE 4'-0" WIDE WOODEN RAISED BEDS, COMPOST BINS AND STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING TURF LARGE TURF AREA WITH BENCHES AND TRASH/RECYCLE RECEPTACLES BOUNDED BY EVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER COLORED STAMPED ASPHALT PAVING AND CROSS WALK GUEST PARKING SMALL TURF AREA WITH BENCH AND TRASH/RECYCLE RECEPTACLE (EV) (EV) COMMON AREA WITH TURF, PLAY AREA, PICNIC TABLES, BARBEQUE GRILL, BENCHES AND TRASH/RECYCLE RECEPTACLES . Page 1662 of 1760 STOP VALLIER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 121 PARK PLACE POINT RICHMOND, CA 94801 TELEPHONE 510.237.7745 RICHMOND, CA # 2016-0536 0 10 20 40 L4 THE QUARRY EXISTING VEGETATION WILL BE INVENTORIED AND NATIVE TREES, SHRUBS GRASSES AND FORBS WILL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. ALL NON-NATIVE TREES AND SHRUBS REMOVED. DISTURBED AREAS PLANTED WITH COAST LIVE OAKS AND AND NATIVE EVERGREEN SHRUBS AND HYDROSEED WITH NATIVE BUCKWHEAT, GRASSES, AND COSTAL SHRUB VEGETATION. SEE SHEET L6 FOR NATIVE HILLSIDE PLANT LIST. APRIL 2022 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ROAD EAST REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT, MILLER/KNOX PARK TRAILHEAD, NEW PARKING AREA, CONNECTED TO EXISTING TRAIL EXISTING SHIPYARD 3 TRAIL CANAL BOULEVARD SEACLIFF DRIVE RETAINED NATIVE SHRUB AREAS WITH BACCHARIS, TOYON, COFFEEBERRY AND FESCUE GRASSES. AREAS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND ILLUSTRATE THE GENERAL CONCEPT OF PROTECTED VEGETATION ZONES EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES. TREES LOCATED TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH LINES AND UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENTS ENLARGEMENT PLAN MILLER/KNOX TRAILHEAD PARKING AND IMPROVEMENTS OPTIONAL SIDEWALK AND STAIR CONNECTION FROM SERVICE ROAD TO EVA ROAD COAST LIVE OAK, PLANTED AT 15-GALLON SIZE NATIVE EVERGREEN SHRUB, TOYON, COFFEBERRY, BACCHARIS OR CEANOTHUS, PLANTED AT 1-GALLON SIZE, MINIMUM HYDROSEED IN DISTURBED AREAS. SEE SHEET L6 FOR NATIVE HILLSIDE PLANT LIST 12'-0" WIDE ASPHALT SERVICE ROAD WITH 3'-0" WIDE DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHOULDERS TO EITHER SIDE. SERVICE ROAD CONNECTS TO THE BAY TRAIL ALONG SEACLIFF ROAD NEW GATE AND BOLLARDS INSTALLED AT TRAIL ENTRANCE PARALLEL PARKING STALLS AT TRAIL HEAD NEW 5'-0" WIDE SIDEWALK INSTALLED ALONG CURB AT PARALLEL PARKING STALLS NEW GATE INSTALLED AT SERVICE ROAD ENTRANCE Page 1663 of 1760 01 08
VALLIER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC.

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN
121 PARK PLACE
POINT RICHMOND, CA 94801
TELEPHONE 510.237.7745
RICHMOND, CA # 2016-0536 0 10 20 40

THE QUARRY
NOVEMBER 2021
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING L5
WALLS

SOIL NAIL WALL DIAGRAM SOIL NAIL WALL ROCK FINISH BOARD FORM CONCRETE

SELUX SATURN POLE LIGHT

SITE LIGHTING

FENCING

PLAY AREA AND PARK
TIMBERFORM LOG CLIMBER 2-12 YR TIMBERFORM PLAY STRUCTURE 2-12 YR - BIRDHOUSE ID SCULPTURE, STEPPING ROCKS 2-12 YR, AND SIGNAL PEAK
CLIMBING BOULDER - 5-12 YR

FIBAR SAFETY SURFACING

SITE AMENITIES

LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES BENCH AND TRASH/RECYCLE

LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES PICNIC TABLE MAILBOXES

STAMPED ASPHALT CROSSWALK

HORIZONTAL WOOD FENCE DEBRIS FENCE

SITE IMAGES
MARCH 2022

GARDEN FENCE PLAY AREA FENCE
APRIL 2022

Page 1664 of 1760 ends

LANDSCAPE PLANTS
Quercus agrifolia, Coast Live Oak

NATIVE HILLSIDE TREE
Erigonum fascicuatum, California Buckwheat

NATIVE HILLSIDE HYDROSEED

NATIVE AND HILLSIDE PLANTS
Baccharis pilularis Chapparal Broom/Coyote-Brush
Bromus carinatus/Native “Bay Area” California Brome
Ceanothus ‘Ray Hartman’, Ray Hartman Wild Lilac
Eriogonum fasciculatum, California Buckwheat
Eschscholzia californica, California Poppy
Elymus glaucus/ “Bay Area” Blue Wildrye
Festuca rubra Molate, Native Red Fescue
Frangula californica, Coffeeberry
Heteromeles arbutifolia, Toyon
01 08
VALLIER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC.

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN
121 PARK PLACE
POINT RICHMOND, CA 94801
TELEPHONE 510.237.7745
RICHMOND, CA # 2016-0536 0 10 20 40

THE QUARRY
NOVEMBER 2021 MARCH 2022
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING L6
Arbutus ‘Marina’, Marina Manzanita Acer palmatum, Japanese Maple Ceanothus ‘RayHartman’, Ray Hartman Wild Lilac Hordeum californicum/California Barley
Lupinus arboreus Yellow Tree Lupine
Lupinus succulentus Arroyo Lupine
Mimulus aurantiacus, Sticky Monkeyflower
Nyssa sylvatica ‘Wildfire’, Wildfire Tupelo
Quercus agrifolia, Coast Live Oak
Verbena bonariensis, Tall Verbena
Westringia fruticosa, Coast Rosemary
Heteromeles arbutifolia, Toyon Bacchari pilularis, Coyote Brush Frangula californica, Coffeeberry
Verbena bonariensis, Tall Verbena
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*Stormwater compatible plants for use in basins
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* Mimulus aurantiacus, Sticky Monkeyflower
Nyssa sylvatica ‘Wildfire’, Wildfire Tupelo
Westringia fruticosa, Coast Rosemary
*
*
APRIL 2022

Page 1665 of 1760 ends

MARCH 16, 2022

Page 1666 of 1760 ends

Front Elevation 1B
+/- 26'-0"
9'-034" 9'-034" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. Front Elevation 1A
+/- 27'-2"
9'-034" 9'-034" P.L. F.F. F.F. P.L. Front Elevation 1C
+/- 26'-0"
9'-034" 9'-034" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. A1.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1667 of 1760 5'-0" Garage 21'-2" x 20'-0"
62'-0" 34'-0" Great Room 17'-6" x 20'-4" First Floor 652 s.f. Kitchen Entry Pdr 47'-0" 10'-0"4'-0" 26'-0" 4'-0"
5'-0" 49'-0" 8'-0" UP 17R Dining Room 11'-0" x storage
5'-6" 3'-6" 6'-0" 6'-0" Porch Second Floor 993 s.f. W.I.C. 20'-6" l.f. Primary Bedroom 14'-2" x 14'-2" Primary Bath Bedroom 2 10'-5" x 10'-5" Bath 2 Laund. DN 17R Bedroom 3 10'-5" x 10'-5" linenDN 17R Loft / Opt. Bedroom 3 10'-5" x 12'-8" linen Opt. Bedroom 3 A1.1 FLOOR PLAN 1 0 2 4 8 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 BEDROOMS + LOFT OPT. BEDROOM 3 2.5 BATHS 1,645 S.F. Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1668 of 1760 Front Elevation 1A
+/- 27'-2"
9'-034" 9'-034" P.L. F.F. F.F. P.L. 4:12 4:12 4:124:12 4:12 6:12
6:12
RIDGE
4:12 RIDGE RIDGE VALLEY VALLEY ROOF PLAN OVERHANG : 12" RAKE : 3" ROOF PITCH :4:12 U.N.O Right Elevation Rear Elevation 9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 27'-2" F.F. Left Elevation Rear Elevation at Enhanced Lots9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 27'-2" F.F. Enhanced Garage- 1A A1.2 PLAN 1A - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 'A' ELEVATIONS Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Stucco Fine Sand Finish Fiber Panel Enhanced Sills Decorative Gable End Details Wood Posts Optional Enhanced Garage Door glass MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1669 of 1760 Front Elevation 1B
+/- 26'-0"
9'-034" 9'-034" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. 6:12 4:12 6:12
6:12
6:12 RIDGE
6:12 ROOF PLAN OVERHANG : 12" ROOF PITCH :6:12 U.N.O
6:12
6:12 6:12 6:12 6:12 6:12
6:12
RIDGE HIP HIP HIP HIP VALLEY HIP HIP HIP VALLEY HIP HIP RIDGE Right Elevation Rear Elevation 9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 26'-0" F.F. Left Elevation Rear Elevation at Enhanced Lots9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 26'-0" F.F. Enhanced Garage- 1B A1.3 PLAN 1B - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 'B' ELEVATIONS Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Stucco Fine Sand Finish Cementitious Siding Decorative Corbels Enhanced Sills Decorative Gable End Details Wood Posts Optional Enhanced Garage Door glass MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1670 of 1760 Front Elevation 1C
+/- 26'-0"
9'-034" 9'-034" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. 6:12 4:124:12
6:12
6:12 RIDGE
6:12 6:12
6:12
RIDGE
VALLEY RIDGE VALLEY ROOF PLAN OVERHANG : 12" RAKE : 3" ROOF PITCH :6:12 U.N.O Right Elevation Rear Elevation 9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 26'-0" F.F. Left Elevation Rear Elevation at Enhanced Lots9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 26'-0" F.F. Enhanced Garage- 1C A1.4 PLAN 1C - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 'C' ELEVATIONS Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Stucco Fine Sand Finish Cementitious Board & Batt Siding Enhanced Sills Decorative Corbels Wood Posts Optional Enhanced Garage Door glass MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1671 of 1760 Front Elevation 2B
+/- 25'-8"
9'-034" 9'-034" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. Front Elevation 2A
+/- 28'-6"
9'-034" 9'-034" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. Front Elevation 2C
+/- 25'-8"
9'-034" 9'-034" P.L. F.F. F.F. P.L. A2.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1672 of 1760 5'-0" Garage 20'-0" x 20'-0"
62'-0" Great Room 25'-0" x 14'-0" First Floor 680 s.f.

UP
17R Entry KitchenPdr w/h 4'-0" 26'-0" 4'-0" 34'-0"
20'-6" 26'-6" 10'-0"
5'-0" 47'-0" 10'-0" 5'-4" 5'-6"
6'-0" 3'-6" Zone Drop Porch Second Floor 1085 s.f. W.I.C. 17'-6" l.f. Primary Bedroom Primary 15'-0" x 14'-0" Bath Loft / Opt. Bedroom 4 14'-7" x 11'-0" Bedroom 3 10'-0" x 10'-6" Bedroom 2 11'-5" x 10'-0" Bath2 Laund. DN 17R A2.1 FLOOR PLAN 2 0 2 4 8 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 BEDROOMS + LOFT OPT. BEDRM 4 2.5 BATHS 1,765 S.F. Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1673 of 1760 Front Elevation 2A
+/- 28'-6"
9'-034" 9'-034" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. 4:12 4:12 4:12
6:12
6:12
RIDGE
6:12 RIDGE RIDGER. VALLEY VALLEY ROOF PLAN OVERHANG : 12" RAKE : 3" ROOF PITCH :4:12 U.N.O Right Elevation Rear Elevation 9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 28'-6" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. Left Elevation Rear Elevation at Enhanced Lots 9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 28'-6" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. A2.2 PLAN 2A - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" Optional Enhanced Garage Door glass 'A' ELEVATIONS Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Stucco Fine Sand Finish Fiber Panel Enhanced Sills Decorative Gable End Details Wood Posts MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1674 of 1760 Front Elevation 2B
+/- 25'-8"
9'-034" 9'-034" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. 6:12 6:12 6:12
6:12
RIDGE
6:12 ROOF PLAN OVERHANG : 12" ROOF PITCH :6:12 U.N.O
6:12 6:12
6:12RIDGE HIP HIP VALLEY VALLEY HIP HIP HIP HIP HIP

RIDGE HIP HIP
6:12
6:12 Right Elevation Rear Elevation
9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 25'-8" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. Left Elevation9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 25'-8" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. Rear Elevation at Enhanced Lots A2.3 PLAN 2B - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 'B' ELEVATIONS Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Stucco Fine Sand Finish Cementitious Siding Decorative Corbels Enhanced Sills Decorative Gable End Details Wood Posts Optional Enhanced Garage Door glass MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1675 of 1760 Front Elevation 2C
+/- 25'-8"
9'-034" 9'-034" P.L. F.F. F.F. P.L. 6:12 6:12
6:12
RIDGE
6:12
6:12 RIDGEVALLEY ROOF PLAN OVERHANG : 12" RAKE : 3" ROOF PITCH :6:12 U.N.O VALLEY RIDGE
6:12 6:12 HIPVALLEY HIP Right Elevation Rear Elevation
9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 25'-8" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. Left Elevation Rear Elevation at Enhanced Lots9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 25'-8" F.F. P.L. F.F. A2.4 PLAN 2C - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 'C' ELEVATIONS Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Metal Roofing Stucco Fine Sand Finish Cementitious Board & Batt Siding Enhanced Sills Decorative Corbels Decorative Railing Wood Posts Optional Enhanced Garage Door glass MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1676 of 1760 Front Elevation 3B
+/- 27'-0"
9'-034" 9'-034" P.L. F.F. F.F. P.L. Front Elevation 3A
+/- 29'-8"
9'-034" 9'-034" P.L. F.F. F.F. P.L. Front Elevation 3C
+/- 29'-8"
9'-034" 9'-034" P.L. F.F. F.F. P.L. A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1677 of 1760 5'-0" Garage 20'-4" x 20'-0"
62'-0" 34'-0" Great Room 15'-8" x 18'-10" First Floor 690 s.f. Dining Room x 10'-8"Pdr. Kitchen UP
17R storage Entry Porch
46'-8" 10'-4"
5'-0" 49'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 26'-0" 4'-0"
5'-0" 5'-6" 3'-6" 5'-6" Second Floor 1150 s.f. Laund.Primary Bedroom 14'-8" x 15'-0" W.I.C. 18'-6" l.f. Primary BathBedroom 2 10'-0" x 10'-0" Bedroom 3 10'-0" x 12'-4" Bath2 DN17R Bedroom 4 11'-3" x 10'-0" linen Loft / Opt. Bedroom 4 19'-9" x 10'-0" Opt. Bedroom 4 below open to A3.1 FLOOR PLAN 3 0 2 4 8 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 BEDROOMS + LOFT OPT. BEDRM 4 2.5 BATHS 1,840 S.F. Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1678 of 1760 Front Elevation 3A
+/- 29'-8"
9'-034" 9'-034" P.L. F.F. F.F. P.L. ROOF PLAN OVERHANG : 12" RAKE : 3" ROOF PITCH :6:12 U.N.O 6:12 6:12 6:12 6:12
6:12
RIDGE
VALLEY VALLEY RIDGE Right Elevation Rear Elevation
9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 29'-8" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. Left Elevation Rear Elevation at Enhanced Lots9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 29'-8" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. A3.2 PLAN 3A - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" Optional Enhanced Garage Door glass 'A' ELEVATIONS Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Stucco Fine Sand Finish Fiber Panel Enhanced Sills Decorative Gable End Details Wood Posts MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1679 of 1760 Front Elevation 3B
+/- 27'-0"
9'-034" 9'-034" P.L. F.F. F.F. P.L. ROOF PLAN OVERHANG : 12" ROOF PITCH :6:12 U.N.O 6:12
6:12
RIDGE
6:12
RIDGE HIP HIP VALLEY HIP HIP HIPHIP 6:12 6:12 6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12 Right Elevation Rear Elevation
9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 27'-0" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. Left Elevation Rear Elevation at Enhanced Lots 9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 27'-0" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. A3.3 PLAN 3B - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL MARCH 01, 2022 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 'B' ELEVATIONS Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Stucco Fine Sand Finish Cementitious Siding Decorative Corbels Enhanced Sills Decorative Gable End Details Wood Posts Optional Enhanced Garage Door glass MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1680 of 1760 Front Elevation 3C
+/- 29'-8"
9'-034" 9'-034" P.L. F.F. F.F. P.L. ROOF PLAN OVERHANG : 12" RAKE : 3" ROOF PITCH :6:12 U.N.O 6:12 6:12 6:12 6:12
6:12
RIDGE
VALLEY VALLEY RIDGE 4:12 4:12 Right Elevation Rear Elevation 9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 29'-8" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. Left Elevation Rear Elevation at Enhanced Lots9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 29'-8" F.F. P.L. P.L. F.F. A3.4 PLAN 3C - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 'C' ELEVATIONS Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Metal Roofing Stucco Fine Sand Finish Cementitious Board & Batt Siding Decorative Corbels Wood Posts Optional Enhanced Garage Door glass MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1681 of 1760 A5.0 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Trellis: See 3/ A5.0.1 for more detail Wood Post Unit Address & Lighting Fixture Garage Door Fiber Cement Panel Stucco-Fine Sand Finish Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Louvered Metal Awning Stucco-Fine San Finish Planter Shelf on Wood Brackets Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Wood Post Standing Seam Metal Roof Stucco-Fine Sand Finish Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Stucco-Fine Sand Finish Fiber Cement Board and Batten Siding -Battens at 16" O.C. Juliette Balcony See 2/ A5.0.1 for more detail 4"w x 2"d Fiber Cement Trim 4"W x 2" D High Density FoamTrim 4"w x 2"d High Density FoamTrim Plan 1_REAR 4" W x 2" D Fiber Cement Trim 3"x4" High Density Enhanced Foam 4" w x 2"d High Density Foam Trim Decorative Corbels 2" x 8" High Density Foam Trim Wood Post Trellis: See 3/A5.0.1 for more detail Recessed Window Entry Door Entry Door 4" w x 2"d High Density Foam Trim Unit Address & Lighting Fixture Garage Door Trellis: See 3/ A5.0.1 for more detail Wood Post Trellis: See 3/A5.0.1 for more detail 1. Plan 1_FRONT 2. Plan 2_REAR 3. Plan 2_FRONT 4. Fiber Cement Board and Batten Siding -Battens at 16" O.C. MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1682 of 1760 3'-6" 5'-10"
9'-4" 7'-4"3'-4" 1'-8"
1'-8" 3'-10"
8'-4" A5.1 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL MARCH 01, 2022 Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Flat Concrete Tile Roofing Stucco-Fine Sand Finish Fiber Cement Shingle Siding Planter Box 4" w x 2" d iber Cement Trim 4" w x 2" d High Density FoamTrim Plan 3_REAR 1. Plan 3_FRONT 2. Trellis: See 3 / A5.0.1 for more detail Wood Post Unit Address & Lighting Fixture Garage Door Stucco-Fine Sand Finish 4" W x 2" D Fiber Cement Trim 4" w x 2"d High Density Foam Trim Planter Box Entry Door Fiber Cement Shingle Siding Wood Post Trellis: See 3/A5.0.1 for more detail JULIETTE BALCONY @ PLAN 2 4. 6" x 6" Wood Post 2" x 4" Wood Rafter Stucco Fine Sand Finish 4" x 8" Wood Beam PLAN VIEW FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW PERSPECTIVE VIEW ENTRY TRELLIS 3. Wood Bracket 6" x 6" Wood Beam 42" H Wood Decorative Wood Railing STUCCO REVEAL REFERENCE IMAGE 5. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING SAMPLE IMAGE 6. Decorative Corbels MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1683 of 1760 9'-034" 9'-034" +/- 27'-2" F.F. Garage W.I.C. Primary Bath Loft / Opt. Bedroom 3 Great Room Dining Room Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 A4.0 PLAN 1 SECTION-TYPICAL 0 2 4 8 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1684 of 1760 A6.0 COLOR SCHEMES 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL JANUARY 12, 2022 'C' ELEVATIONS 'B' ELEVATIONS 'A' ELEVATIONS MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1685 of 1760 A7.0 STREET SCENE KEY MAP Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 01, 2022 MARCH 16, 2022 Page 1686 of 1760 A7.1 STREET SCENE KEY MAP Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL MARCH 21, 2022 Page 1687 of 1760 A6.0 COLOR SCHEMES Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com NEW WEST ADVISORS, LLC THE QUARRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RICHMOND, CA # 2021-0566 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL 1B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910111213 14 15 16 1718 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 4546474849 51525354 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 44 50 55565758 59 60 61 62 63 26' 24'
24'
24' 24' 24' 24' A STREET A STREET

A STREET

B STREET

C STREET

D STREET
MAIN
ENTRY

SEACLIFF DRIVE
SEACLIFF DRIVE PROPOASED E.V.A. EASEMENT AREA (AREA = 6,221 SF) EVA
ROAD LANDS OF EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT APN 560-330-031 11495 OR 791

HOLDINGS, LLC
APN 560-330-023
2016-18306 34' R/W 29' R/W 34' R/W
34' R/W
29' R/
29' R/W
52' R/W PARCEL A PARCEL B PARCEL C PARCEL D PARCEL F 10' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT 10' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT 10' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT 10' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT PARCEL E RE-PAVE EXISTING BAY TRAIL, TYP. RE-PAVE EXISTING BAY TRAIL, TYP. FUTURE STAGING AREA CONNECTION, SEE SHEET C3.0 24' 4' 8'
62'
LOT AREA 2,108 SF R/WTRC Graphic Scale (in feet 0 1 inch = 40 ft. 40 40 TYPICAL LOT LAYOU SCALE: 1" = 20' LEGEND: BOUNDARY LINE RIGHT OF WAY LOT LINE EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPOSED CURB & SIDEWALK PROPOSED WALL PROPOSED BIORETENTION AREA PROPOSED PAVEMENT 1C 2B 2A 3C 1B 3A 2C 1B 1A 3C 1B 2A 2C 3B 1A 3C 2B 2A 3C 1B 3A 1C PRELIMINARY PLAN & STYLE PLOTTING (FINAL PLOTTING MAY VARY) A8.0 LEGEND 13C NUMBER = PLAN TYPE LETTER = BUILDING STYLE A = SOUTHERN COTTAGE B = CALIFORNIA COTTAGE C = CONTEMPORARY COTTAGE 3A1B3C1A1B2C3A2B1C 3C 1B 2A 2C 3B 1A 1C 2B 3A 3C 3B 2A 2C 2B 3A 1C 3B 1A 2C 2B 2A 3C 1B 3A 1C 3B 2C3A2B1C1A 2A1B1A2C2B 3C2A3B1C 3A 1B 2A 3C 1B Plan Type Style
1 A 82 A 93 A 81 B 92 B 83 B 81 C 92 C 83 C 9
76 HOUSE
# times occurs
Total
APRIL 2022

Page 1688 of 1760 ends

9/29/21
City of Richmond Planning Department
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Attention Richmond Planning Commissioners;
I am writing as a follow-up to the Point Richmond Neighborhood Council’s LUDRC’s 9/29/21 Virtual Meeting review of the Quarry Housing Project Update
LUDRC members in attendance:

Rod Satre, Chair
Bonnie Daly
Jane Lundin
Stephen Parker
Charmain Tyler, Secretary
From PRNC:

Garry Hurlbut
Neighbors:

Brian Lewis Leisa Johnson
Karen Monte Bill Monsen
June Hight Latadra Goode

Page 1689 of 1760 ends

From the Quarry Housing Project:

Terry Manly, New West
David Burton, KTGY, Architect and Land Planners
Robert Stevens, CSW, Civil Engineer
Marcia Vallier, Landscape Architect
Motion made by Bonnie and seconded:

To approve this project, with limited approval. We would like to see a change in the street access, and a redesign on how these houses look from the street.

Vote:

In favor: 3
Opposed: 2
Motion passes
Stephen supports what has been presented. The smaller footprint is OK.

Stephen is in favor of the limited approval to change the look of the garages in the front.

Peter Thelin
President, PRNC
(510) 326-8108
[email protected]
https://pointrichmond.org/

Page 1690 of 1760 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

May 17, 2022
Finance Department
DATE: May 17, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM: Shasa Curl, City Manager
Anil Comelo, Interim Deputy City Manager
Delmy Cuellar, Interim Director of Finance
Mubeen Qader, Budget Administrator
Antonio Banuelos, Revenue Manager
Subject: Budget Presentation
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact for receiving department presentations

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

April 19, 2022, April 26, 2022, May 3, 2022

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

City staff from various City departments will provide an overview of their programs, staffing, and Fiscal Year
2022-2023 proposed budget
RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECEIVE budget presentations from the City Manager and the Community Development and Community
Services Departments – City Manager’s Office/Finance
Department (Shasa Curl 620-6512/ Delmy Cuellar 620-
6790/ Mubeen Qader 412-2077).

DISCUSSION:

City staff is working with all departments to develop a balanced budget for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The purpose of this budget agenda item is to hear budget presentations from City departments. Each department will describe the services they AGENDA
REPORT

Page 1691 of 1760 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

May 17, 2022
provide, what they have accomplished, plans for next fiscal year, staffing levels, and proposed draft budgets.

The proposed order of the presentations is as follows:

April 19, 2022 Internal Services (Human Resources, Finance, Information Technology)
April 26, 2022 City Attorney
City Clerk
City Manager
Economic Development (Arts & Culture, Business Development, Environmental & Health Initiatives, Port, Real Estate, Richmond Housing Authority, Department of Children and Youth)
May 3, 2022 City Council
Mayor
Public Works (Building Maintenance, Engineering & Capital Improvement Projects, Fleet, Maintenance & Abatement, Parks Maintenance Water Resource Recovery)
May 17, 2022 Community Services (Children and Youth, Employment & Training, Environmental and Community Investment Agreement Grant
Administration, Library, Office of Neighborhood Safety, Recreation, Transportation)
Community Development (Building, Code Enforcement, Housing Policy, Planning, Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency)
May 24, 2022 Police (Administration, Traffic, Investigations, Patrol) Fire (Administration and Support, Emergency Services, Fire Prevention, Training)
In case any updates are made to this agenda item or any attachments, please visit the City’s website at https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/1427/Presentations for the most up-todate budget information and presentations.

NEXT STEPS:

City staff members will return on May 24th with the department presentations listed above and will also bring Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budget updates as needed through June 2022.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Budget Presentation (Community Development and Community Services)

Page 1692 of 1760 ends

City Council Meeting
May 17, 2022
▹
▹

Page 1693 of 1760 ends

2 FY 2022-23 Potential Budget Savings
Complete Vacancy
Saving Analysis
Reduce Legal Services
Agreements
Reduce Insurance
Premiums
(Workers Compensation and
General Liability)
Implement Alternate
Dispute Resolution
Program
(Pending)
Reduce Professional
Services Contracts

Page 1694 of 1760 ends

Expenditures Not Budgeted
Inflation Contingency
New CalPERS and
OPEB Rates
Additional Position
Requests
Additional Operating
Expenses Requests
Position
Reclassification
Requests
Contract
Negotiations in
Progress *(IAFF,

RFMA, RPMA, RPOA)
Costs of Classification
and Compensation
Study
Implementation
Improve City’s Paving
Index
Pension Obligation
Bonds/SWAP costs
3 *International Association of Fire Firefighters (IAFF), Richmond Fire Management Association (RFMA), Richmond Police Management Association (RPMA), Richmond Police Officers Association (RPOA)

Page 1695 of 1760 ends

Proposed FY 2021-22
Year-End Priorities
Clear Negative Fund
Balances
Engineering Fund ($2.9 million)
Stormwater Fund ($2.6 million)
Pre-Fund Other Post
Employment Benefits
(OPEB)
($1 Million)
Increase General Fund
Reserve Level to 15%
($6 -$8 Million)
Increase Risk Management
Confidence Level to 65%
($2 Million)
Implement Classification
and Compensation Study
MOU Negotiations
*(IAFF, RFMA, RPMA, RPOA
in Progress)
4 *International Association of Fire Firefighters (IAFF), Richmond Fire Management Association (RFMA), Richmond Police Management Association (RPMA), Richmond Police Officers Association (RPOA)

Page 1696 of 1760 ends

Community
Development
Department
FY 2022-23 Budget
Presentation
May 17, 2022

Page 1697 of 1760 ends

Community Development
Department
3 Community
Development
Director
Planning
Division
Building
Division
Code
Enforcement Housing Successor Agency

Page 1698 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DO – Planning & Building Divisions
The Planning Division:
▪ Updates and implements the General Plan to achieve community goals
▪ Reviews land use and development projects for consistency with General Plan and Zoning Ordinance
▪ Leads & partners in the preparation of grant applications for capital projects, plan implementation, and plan development
▪ Lead and support the development of citywide or project specific plans
▪ Staff to the Design Review Board, Historic Preservation Commission, and Planning Commission
The Building Division:
▪ Enforces California Code of Regulations Title 24, the California Health and Safety Code, and the Richmond Municipal Code as they relate to construction
▪ Manages the Residential Rental Inspection Program to ensure minimum housing quality standards and completes habitability inspections
▪ Works to improve public access to permit and inspection services via the city website
▪ Continues to implement technologies that promote efficiency and improve and streamline permitting and inspection services 4 Planning & Building

Page 1699 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DID IN FY 2021-22
Planning & Building Divisions
5 ▪ Issued 2,981 building permits
▪ Issued new construction building permits for 259
dwelling units (DU), Entitled 205 DU, and 518 DU
under review
▪ Issued 70 accessory dwelling units (ADU) Permits;
approved 97 ADU Zoning Compliance applications
▪ Supported the development and adoption of
the Natural Gas Ban
▪ Secured $1.25 million in grant funding for the Hilltop Area Specific Plan
▪ Initiated the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
Planning & Building

Page 1700 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PLAN TO DO IN FY 2022-23
Planning & Building Divisions
6 ▪ Complete Triennial Building Code Adoption
▪ Continue to implement technologies and processes that improve permitting efficiencies and streamlining
▪ Recruit, hire and train new building inspection staff in preparation for upcoming staff retirements
▪ Participate and collaborate on regional planning efforts ▪ Complete the visioning & preferred land use plan
alternative for Hilltop Area Specific Plan
▪ Adopt the 6
th Cycle Housing Element and obtain
HCD certification
Planning & Building

Page 1701 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PROPOSE (BUDGET)
Planning and Building Divisions
7 Planning & Building
FY2022-23 DRAFT BUDGET
FY2021-22
Revised Budget
FY2022-23
Proposed
Revenue Licenses, Permits, & Fees 6,427,663 6,902,259
Charges for Services 3,359,000 2,733,000
Grants 660,000 500,000
Operating Transfers In 1,800,000 1,800,000
Total Revenue 12,246,663 11,935,259
Expenditures Salaries & Wages 2,524,274 2,468,066
Benefits 1,801,725 1,850,584
Professional & Admin 6,244,720 5,036,103
Other Operating 83,406 83,406
Utilities 14,000 9,000
Equipment & Contract Services 11,409 11,409
Cost Pool 1,908,033 2,423,772
Asset Capital Outlay 1,000 1,000
Total Expenditures 12,588,567 11,883,340
Net Impact 341,904 (51,919)

Page 1702 of 1760 ends

WHO WE ARE (STAFF)
Community Development
8 Community Development
Positions FY21-22
Mid-Year
FY22-23
Proposed
ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE 1.0 1.0
ASSOC ADMIN ANALYST 1.0 1.0
BLDG INSP SUPV 1.0 1.0
BUILDING INSPECTOR 1.0 1.0
BUILDING OFFICIAL 1.0 1.0
CODE ENF OFFICER I/II/III 7.0 7.0
CODE ENFORCEMENT MAN 1.0 1.0
COMM DEV DIRECTOR 1.0 1.0
DEPUTY BDLG OFFICIAL 1.0 1.0
HOUSING MANAGER 1.0 1.0
INDUSTRIAL BDLG INSP 1.0 1.0
PERMIT TECHNICIAN I/II 4.0 4.0
PLAN CHECKING ENGR 1.0 1.0
PLANNER II 3.0 3.0
PLANNING MANAGER 1.0 1.0
SENIOR ACCOUNTANT 1.0 1.0
SENIOR PLANNER 4.0 4.0
SR BLDG INSP 4.0 4.0
SR. ADMIN ANALYST 1.0 1.0

36.0 36.0

Page 1703 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DO – Code Enforcement
9 ▪ Preserve, improve and stabilize the physical, and
social and economic health of our
neighborhoods by consistently reducing and
eliminating blight, health and safety, public
nuisance, zoning and vehicle abatement violations
on private properties.
▪ Code Enforcement Officers conduct private
property inspections, investigate complaints,
educate, seeks voluntary compliance and provide
enforcement by issuing Notice of Violations and
Tiered Administrative Citations.
▪ We partner and collaborate with City staff, outside
governmental agencies and the community
to provide comprehensive services.

Code
Enforcement

Page 1704 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DID IN FY 2021-22
Code Enforcement
10 ▪ Implemented cannabis business
permit (CBP) - issued 16 CBPs
▪ Completed 1,077 inspections
▪ Opened 728 cases, and Closed 748 cases
▪ Issued 224 administrative citations
▪ Issued 538 notice of violations
▪ Issued 311 vehicle intent to tow notices
Code
Enforcement

Page 1705 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PLAN TO DO IN FY 2022-23
Code Enforcement
11 ▪ Develop and implement alcohol, tobacco and taxi permit programs including RMC updates
▪ Increase vacant property registration and enforcement ▪ Expand enforcement of CBPs, through enhanced inspections ▪ Expand residential rental inspection program enforcement ▪ Continued enforcement of dangerous, blighted properties that devalue and destabilize City neighborhoods
▪ Increase vehicle abatement enforcement
▪ Update documents, notices, and forms to comply with updated RMC requirements
Code
Enforcement

Page 1706 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PROPOSE (BUDGET)
Code Enforcement
12 Code Enforcement
FY2022-23 DRAFT BUDGET
FY2021-22
Revised Budget
FY2022-23
Proposed
Revenue Licenses, Permits, & Fees 530,000 955,500
Other Revenues 36,786 30,000
Total Revenue 566,786 985,500
Expenditures Salaries & Wages 702,020 798,887
Benefits 600,678 724,286
Professional & Admin 364,898 373,400
Other Operating 26,447 28,947
Utilities 11,000 11,500
Equipment & Contract Services 13,549 13,549
Cost Pool 165,000
Total Expenditures 1,718,592 2,115,569
Net Impact 1,151,806 1,130,069

Page 1707 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DO – Housing/Successor Agency
13 ▪ Completing the Recognized Obligation projects, including Miraflores and Metrowalk Phase 2
▪ Management of City's Loan portfolio
▪ Administers City's Inclusionary Housing and Affordable Housing Nexus Fee program, including monitoring of regulatory agreements ▪ Oversees and administers the Successor Agency's Deed of Trust related to Marina Bay Developments
▪ Administers the Fair Chance Housing Ordinance
▪ Works with Richmond Rapid Response Fund to provide rental assistance
▪ Leads and oversees the development of the Homelessness Strategic Plan
Housing/Successor
Agency

Page 1708 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DID IN FY 2021-22
Housing/Successor Agency
14 ▪ Assisted in completing Phase 1 studies for
Richmond Housing
▪ Authority projects (RHA) utilizing EPA
brownfield assessment funds
▪ Obtained $50,000 in All Home funding for
Homelessness Strategic Plan
▪ Obtained a new EPA $600,000 grant for
brownfield assessments
▪ Obtained a $4.8 Million Encampment Resolution
Funding for Castro Encampment
▪ Partnered with RichmondLAND to obtain a
Breakthrough Grant for a housing fellow to further
equitable housing policies
Housing/Successor
Agency

Page 1709 of 1760 ends

15 WHAT WE PLAN TO DO IN FY 2022-23
Housing/Successor Agency
▪ Hire a Housing Manager
▪ Assist the Richmond Housing Authority in the
disposition and redevelopment of Nystrom Village
and Nevin Plaza
▪ Complete development and adoption of the
Homelessness Strategic Plan
▪ Begin surplus property disposition process
▪ Support the development of the 6th Cycle Housing
Element and Housing Equity Roadmap
▪ Begin implementation of the $4.8 Million
Encampment Resolution Funding project
Housing

Page 1710 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PROPOSE (BUDGET)
Housing Department
16 Housing Department
FY2022-23 DRAFT BUDGET
2021-22 MID-YEAR 2022-23 PROPOSED
Revenue LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES 668,221 568,000
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY 200,186 63,149
OTHER REVENUE 629,042 618,651
INTERGOV FED GRANT 300,000 300,000
INTERGOV STATE GRANT 666,431 166,431
PROC FR SLE PROP 106,035 106,035
LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS 377,861 311,518
OPER XFERS IN 562,101
TOTAL REVENUE 3,509,879 2,133,786
Expenditures SALARIES AND WAGES 304,411 345,890
PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 227,547 191,715
PROF & ADMIN 1,339,937 874,061
OTHER OPERATING 8,468 8,711
UTILITIES 801 801
COST POOL 233,290 179,603
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,232,350 1,150,000
CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 3,889,563 3,085,000
OPER XFERS OUT 1,042,101 480,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURE 8,278,471 6,315,782
Net Impact (4,768,591) (4,181,995)

Page 1711 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PROPOSE (BUDGET)
Successor Agency
17 Successor Agency
FY2022-23 DRAFT BUDGET
2021-22 MID-YEAR 2022-23

PROPOSED
Revenue PROPERTY TAXES 10,741,388 8,340,222
OPER XFERS IN 11,079,175 9,212,427
TOTAL REVENUE 21,820,563 17,552,650
Expenditures SALARIES AND WAGES 203,091 262,476
PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 121,388 62,390
PROF & ADMIN 121,700 109,700
OTHER OPERATING 497,009 567,110
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 216,101 100,000
COST POOL 50,000 13,896
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,299,910 3,180,000
DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 8,681,650 8,259,228
OPER XFERS OUT 11,079,175 9,212,427
TOTAL EXPENDITURE 24,270,026 21,767,228
Net Impact (2,449,468) (4,214,578)

Page 1712 of 1760 ends

COMMUNITY

SERVICES

DEPARTMENT
Richmond City Council
May 17, 2022
1

Page 1713 of 1760 ends

Community
Services
Department
Employment & Training
Library and LEAP
Office of Neighborhood Safety
Recreation
Transportation
American Rescue Plan
Reimagining Public Safety Task Force
2

Page 1714 of 1760 ends

EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING
3

Page 1715 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DO
Ensure a continuum of education and
training opportunities that build a
skilled workforce to meet current and
future employer needs
Provide year-round and summer
employment, career pathways training,
internships and supportive services for
youth to successfully transition into
adulthood
Help residents obtain good jobs in
high growth, high wage occupations
through regional employer partnerships
Prepare residents for construction
trades careers
4 E&T

Page 1716 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE
DID IN
FY 2021-22
Awarded over $11 million
dollars to provide employment
and training services to
Richmond residents
 Adult workers
 Youth
 Dislocated Workers
 ESL
 Youth with Disabilities
 Construction Trades
Served over 500 youth through
year-round, summer
employment, and supportive
services
Graduated 3 PreApprenticeship (Construction
Trade) Cohorts (60) with 80%
placement
Served over 6,000 residents at
the One-Stop Career Center 5
E&T

Page 1717 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PLAN TO DO IN FY 2022-23
6 Build technical skills training,
career pathways and
employment opportunities in
high-growth, high-wage
industries for Richmond
residents
Create “Quality Jobs”
that provide livable
wages with benefits,
offer the most direct
path to economic
mobility and broadly
shared prosperity
Provide Richmond resident, with
the resources and services they
need to enter, participate in,
and complete broader
workforce preparation, training
and education programs aligned
with regional labor market
needs
Provide year-round,
work-based learning
and career technical
education for 500
Richmond Youth ages
16 – 24
Train 100 Richmond
residents for jobs and
careers in the construction
& renewable energy
sectors; expand direct-entry
agreements with Building
Trades
Provide access to Metrix
Learning, an online
workforce development
tool for workforce
training, for all
Richmond residents
E&T

Page 1718 of 1760 ends

WHO WE ARE (STAFF)
Positions FY21-22
Mid-Year
FY22-23
Proposed
Administrative Aide 1.0 1.0
Administrative Services Analyst 1.0 1.0
Assistant Administrative Analyst 2.0 2.0
Deputy Director of Community
Services, Employment &
Training 1.0 1.0
Employment Program Manager 3.0 3.0
Employment Program Specialist
I/II 9.0 9.0
Library & Community Services
Director 1.0 1.0
Project Coordinator 1.0 1.0
Senior Accountant 1.0 1.0
Senior Employment Program
Specialist 2.0 2.0
Total Full-Time Equivalent
(FTEs) 22.0 22.0
7 E&T

Page 1719 of 1760 ends

8 FY2022-23 DRAFT BUDGET
FY2021-22
Mid-Year
FY2022-23
Proposed
Revenue Licenses, Permits, Fees 169,536 170,317
Charges for Services 24,000 24,000
Other Revenue 151,738 151,738
Grants 6,263,244 6,645,331
Operating Transfers In 3,425,705 3,641,526
Total Revenue 10,034,223 10,632,912
Expenditures Salaries & Wages 1,800,598 1,854,199
Benefits 1,519,767 1,589,767
Professional & Admin 6,200 7,300
Other Operating 182,807 197,480
Utilities 13,000 9,000
Equipment & Contract Services 589,088 568,879
Cost Pool 543,408 1,524,805
Asset Capital Outlay 100,000 100,000
Grant Expenditures 5,109,159 4,772,532
Employment & Training Allocation 376,496 3,307,701
Total Expenditures 10,240,523 13,931,663
Net Impact (206,300) (3,298,751)

WHAT WE PROPOSE (BUDGET) E&T

Page 1720 of 1760 ends

LIBRARY
AND

LITERACY

FOR EVERY
ADULT

PROGRAM
(LEAP)
9

Page 1721 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DO
Provides diverse materials and
services to meet the community’s
personal, cultural, educational, and
professional needs both onsite and
remotely
Encourages lifelong enjoyment of
reading and learning through early
childhood activities and story times,
author events, hands on STEAM
workshops and active readers advisory
Promotes literacy in the areas of,
English as a Second Language, Digital
Literacy, workforce development, civic
engagement, and family literacy
Supports the 5-member Library
Advisory Commission and
collaborates with the Friends of the
Richmond Public Library and the
Richmond Public Library Foundation
10 Library

Page 1722 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DID IN FY 2021-22
• Reopened West Side and Bayview Branch libraries for
in-person service and expanded hours: Main Library 41
hours per week, West Side and Bayview Branch libraries
20 hours per week
• Lunch @ the Library moves to Free Summer Lunch
Sites with a side of Books
• Grants Awarded = $282,000 and Grants Pending = $10.3
million dollars
• Submitted $15 million dollar Building Forward Library Infrastructure grant application and $342,000 Stronger
Together Out of School Bookmobile grant
• Added new self-guided online learning Courses
(Coursera, LinkedIn Learning, GetSetUp, Learning
Express, Northstar Digital Library and Skillshare)
• Started a new technology service lending Internet
Hotspots and Chromebooks to increase access to
Library online resources
11 Library

Page 1723 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PLAN TO DO IN FY 2022-23
 Expand open hours of service to include Saturdays at the Main Library
 Restart the in-person reading enrichment programs at the Main Library and Bayview and West Side Branch libraries  Develop a Strategic Plan with robust community
engagement
 Launch a Marketing/Communications Initiative
to raise awareness of the library
 Actively seek community partnerships and grant funding to advance the mission of the library, especially to
underserved communities
 Execute the California State Library Building Forward Library Infrastructure Program grant to remodel the Main Library and the Stronger Together grant to purchase and customize a new bookmobile
 Add a zero-emissions Electric Vehicle/Delivery Van to move materials between libraries daily improving service to the residents of Richmond
12 Library

Page 1724 of 1760 ends

LITERACY

FOR EVERY
ADULT

PROGRAM
(LEAP)
 Literacy for Every Adult Program (LEAP) is a free Library program that helps adults develop the competences and self-confidence they need to achieve their individual goals
 LEAP provides GED test preparation, Career Online High School, English as a Second Language (ESL) and Family Literacy
 LEAP combines online classes, face to face instruction, one-to-one tutoring to deliver hybrid instruction
 Learners, tutors and teacher pair traditional instructional methods with digital literacy a core competency skill needed in today’s job market.
 LEAP Community Partnerships: Bay Area Rescue Mission, Office of Neighborhood Safety, T-Mobile, Richmond Promise, City of Richmond YouthWORKS and Contra Costa Health Services Career Pathways program

WHAT WE DO LEAP

Page 1725 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DID IN FY 2021
-22
• LEAP received grants to support literacy services including adult literacy instruction, families for literacy services, and English as a Second Language services TOTALING $195,200 • LEAP provided literacy services to Richmond
residents, offered GED preparation classes at Bay Area
Rescue Mission, partnered with Office of Neighborhood
Safety, served as host site for YouthWORKS summer youth employees, Richmond Promise mentor and Contra Costa
Health Services Health Career Pathways mentor
• 3 adult learners became members of the City of Richmond’s Race and Equity Team after completing LEAP’s civic
engagement training
• 127 active adult learners; 14 GED certificate earned, 6 high school diplomas, 21 adults and 39 children participate in the Families for Literacy Services
• During the pandemic official GED testing sites were closed, LEAP became an official GED testing site for students
• LEAP has a group of dedicated volunteers who donated
1,263 hours, the equivalent of $34,985 in salary
• Entered partnership with T-Mobile Government contracting to secure 25 free tablets for students to continue their education remotely with free hotspots
LEAP

Page 1726 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PLAN TO DO
IN FY 2022-23
• Welcome limited number of students
back for face-to-face instruction
• Add English Language Civics to our
ESL program
• Hire a part-time ESL instructor with
new ESL Grant funds
• Host LEAP graduation
• Work with Library to bring back
Summer Literacy program
• Partner with Employment & Training
to create a basic computer class
LEAP

Page 1727 of 1760 ends

WHO WE ARE (STAFF)
Positions FY21-22
Mid-Year
FY22-23
Proposed
ADMIN LIBRARIAN 2.0 2.0
ADMIN SERVICES ANALYST 1.0 1.0
ASSOC. ADMIN ANALYST 1.0 1.0
DEP. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY
SERVICES - LIBRARY 1.0 1.0
EXEC. SECRETARY II 1.0 1.0
FAMILY LITERACY SPECIALIST 1.0 1.0
LEARNING CENTER MANAGER II 1.0 1.0

LIBRARY INFORMATION SYSTEMS
TECH 1.0 1.0
LIBRARIAN I/II 8.0 8.0
LIBRARY ASSISTANT I/II 6.0 6.0
LIBRARY ASSOCIATE 2.0 2.0
LITERACY PROGRAM MANAGER 1.0 1.0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 0.7 0.7
SR. LIBRARY ASSISTANT 2.0 2.0

VOLUNTEER TUTOR/LEARNING
COORDINATOR 3.0 3.0

31.7 31.7 16
Library & LEAP

Page 1728 of 1760 ends

LIBRARY -

WHAT WE

PROPOSE
(BUDGET)
17 FY2022-23 DRAFT BUDGET
FY2021-22
Revised Budget
FY2022-23
Proposed
Revenue Licenses, Permits, & Fees 36,302
Other Revenue 2,500
Rental Income 14,062 44,884
Grants 172,222 126,222
Total Revenue 222,586 183,606
Expenditures Salaries & Wages 2,441,672 2,438,587
Benefits 2,382,220 2,320,675
Professional & Admin 1,016,316 819,648
Other Operating 79,929 80,750
Utilities 6,000 8,000
Equipment & Contract Services 2,336 2,136
Cost Pool 246,440 387,915
Asset Capital Outlay 342,383 429,995
Grant Expenditures 3,000 5,500
Total Expenditures 6,520,297 6,493,208
Net Impact (6,297,711) (6,309,602)
WHAT WE PROPOSE (BUDGET) Library & LEAP

Page 1729 of 1760 ends

Office of Neighborhood Safety
18 Page 1730 of 1760

WHAT WE DO
Gun Violence Prevention: Work to dramatically reduce and one day eliminate gun violence and associated injuries/deaths in the City of Richmond Manage Street Outreach Strategies: Engage those at the center of and most impacted by historical firearm-related hostilities
Operation Peacemaker Fellowship: Provide attention, intensive engagement, and support structures through a peer-facilitated group mentoring model. The fellowship supports the consistent improvement of the social and emotional health and wellness of young people 19 ONS

Page 1731 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DID IN FY 2021-22
Total Contacts Hours
Street Outreach 1900 1939.5
Fellow Engagements 3137 3427.5
Referrals 35 47
All Conflicts Mediated 60 130
Shooting Response 27 32
Cyclical & Retaliatory Gun Violence
Interruptions (CRGVI) 2 7
20 ONS

Page 1732 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE

PLAN TO

DO IN FY
2022-23
 Leverage Reimagining Public
Safety funding to hire and train
additional staff
 Support service expansion to
various demographics across the
City and programming within the
West Contra Costa Unified
School District
 Secure in excess of $6 million in
State of California grant funding
to ensure sustainability across
strategic initiatives
 Continue efforts to make the City
of Richmond a healthy and safe
community for those who live,
work and play here.
21 ONS

Page 1733 of 1760 ends

WHO WE
ARE
(STAFF)
22 Positions FY21-22
Mid-Year
FY22-23
Proposed
Administrative Aide 1.0 1.0
Accounting Assistant 1.0 1.0
Deputy Director of Community
Services – ONS 1.0 1.0
Neighborhood Change Agents 11.0 11.0
ONS Field Coordinator 2.0 2.0
ONS Program Manager 1.0 1.0
Project Coordinator 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time Equivalent
(FTEs) 18.0 18.0
ONS

Page 1734 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PROPOSE (FY 2022-23 BUDGET)
23 FY 2022-23 DRAFT BUDGET
FY2021-22
Mid-Year
FY2022-23
Proposed
Revenue Other Revenue 5,000
Grants 1,045,028
Total Revenue 1,050,028
Expenditures Salaries & Wages 812,496 1,341,638
Benefits 600,409 1,165,150
Professional & Admin 1,621,244 1,714,090
Other Operating 1,636,040 109,640
Utilities 16,000 66,000
Cost Pool 152,010 505,067
Asset Capital Outlay 9,600
Grant Expenditures 546,725
Total Expenditures 5,394,524 4,901,585
Net Impact (4,344,496) (4,901,585)
ONS

Page 1735 of 1760 ends

RECREATION &

NEIGHBORHOOD

SERVICES
Community
Service
Children &
Family
Programs
Aquatics,
Youth &
Adult
Sports
Seniors,
Special
Needs &
Special
Events
Neighborhood
Services
Grants
Finance &
Registration
24

Page 1736 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DO
Provide recreational experiences that enhance
active health and wellness lifestyles for all age
groups through youth programs, sports programs,
aquatic programs, special needs programs, adult
programs, and senior programs.

Enrich the quality of life for our community through
our programs, special events and facilities that
promote cultural unity and a sense of place.

Engage our residents to strengthen community
image and protect the environmental resources
through the Love Your Block beautification programs,
Adopt A Senior Programs, Tool Lending Library and
Mobile Tool Lending Library.

Empower our staff through in-house financial
support and training; facilitate rentals and program
registrations; support our commissions; and seek
grants to support our programs and facility upgrades.
25 Recreation

Page 1737 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DID IN
FY 2021-22
• Delivered programs in various formats
to keep our community safe while
being active
• Transitioned virtual afterschool,
summer camps and sports for youth
programs to in person and hybrid
opportunities (both in-person and
virtual).
• Our pools reopened.
• Senior Centers continued to provide
programs in a hybrid format to allow
our seniors the freedom to choose
programs of their comfort level.
• Developing Personal Resources Center
continued to provide virtual programs.
• Awarded 8 grants for various facilities
and parks improvements.
• Beautified our community through
Love Your Block (LYB) Programs (MLK
Park, Nevin Avenue and Nystrom)
• LYB COVID-19 Mini-Grants were
awarded 26
Recreation

Page 1738 of 1760 ends

27 Received grant awards totaling $14,054,000:
 $8 million from California State Parks Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization program for Shields-Reid Park Renovation
 $5 million from Caltrans Clean California Local Grant Program for Boorman Park, 7th Street, I Heart Richmond, and community beautification programs
 $500,000 from NFL and CDBG for the MLK Turf and Field Renovation  $264,000 from Hellman Foundation for park maintenance  $100,000 from PG&E Resilience Hubs Grant for resilience hubs  $100,000 from The PG&E Corporation Foundation Better Together Resilient Communities Grant for emergency cooling structures
 $90,000 from Richmond Fund for Children and Youth Grant for Camp Achieve Continued implementing previously awarded grants:
 $4.165 million from California State Parks Statewide Park Program Proposition 68 grants for Boorman Park Revitalization
Engaged and collaborated with residents, City departments, commissions, and community-based organizations to develop grant proposals
Developed and submitted additional grant applications for more than $6 million in funding WHAT WE DID IN FY 2021-22 (GRANTS)
Recreation

Page 1739 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PLAN TO DO IN FY 2022-23
 Bring our special events back so we
can celebrate with the community
 Third of July Fireworks Show, Black
History Event and Chinese New Year
to name a few
 Return to full or expanded in-person
capacity in our programs, sports,
aquatics, youth and senior
opportunities
 Implement Fee Waiver and
Partnership Policy to provide
equitable access to all community
members
 Extend Tool Lending Library hours
 Find new grants to continue to uplift
facilities and expand programs
28 Recreation

Page 1740 of 1760 ends

29 Page 1741 of 1760

WHO WE ARE (STAFF)
Positions
FY21-22
Mid-Year
FY22-23
Proposed
Accountant Assistant I/II 1.0 1.0
Administrative Aide 1.0 1.0
Assistant Administrative Analyst 1.0 1.0
Associate Administrative Analyst 1.0 1.0
Auditorium Aide 3.2 3.2
Deputy Director of Community Services - Recreation 1.0 1.0 Development Project Manager II .4 .4
Executive Secretary II 1.0 1.0
Lifeguard 1.6 1.6
Office Specialist 2.0 2.0
Recreation Program Coordinator 8.0 8.0
Recreation Program Specialist 3.2 3.2
Recreation Supervisor 3.0 3.0
Senior Accountant 1.0 1.0
Senior Lifeguard 1.6 1.6
Total Full-Time Equivalent (FTEs) 30.0 30.0
30 Recreation

Page 1742 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PROPOSE (BUDGET)
31 FY2022-23 DRAFT BUDGET
FY2021-22
Mid-Year
FY2022-23
Proposed
Revenue Licenses, Permits, & Fees 461,153 781,808
Other Revenue 207,856 15,500
Rental Income 393,906 525,567
Grants 4,606 4,606
Total Revenue 1,067,521 1,327,481
Expenditures Salaries & Wages 2,662,675 2,599,852
Benefits 1,939,771 2,193,092
Professional & Admin 649,533 658,356
Other Operating 63,378 28,541
Utilities 18,389 55,520
Equipment & Contract Services 7,250 10,500
Cost Pool 447,718 777,167
Asset Capital Outlay 208,317 15,430
Grant Expenditures 132,500 52,500
Total Expenditures 6,129,531 6,390,957
Net Impact (5,062,010) (5,063,476)
Recreation

Page 1743 of 1760 ends

TRANSPORTATION
32

Page 1744 of 1760 ends

R-Transit
• Manage the R-Transit and LYFT partnership to provide 24/7 service to over 1500 registered clients
City Parking Authority
• Management of city on-street and off-street parking inventory • Responsible for developing parking policy, programs (neighborhood permit parking and parklets), regulations, and the parking enterprise fund Transportation Sustainability
• Coordinate city electric vehicle (EV) service equipment capital improvement and manage equipment
• Steward fleet and transportation network electrification • Provide EV and alternative energy education and outreach to promote clean transportation
Micromobility
• Manage Micromobility services (bikeshare, on-demand shuttle and car share programs) Grant Administration and Technical Support
• Acquire and manage over $7 million in grants and project partnerships • Serve on various EV, transportation authority, planning committees, and city working groups
• Provide technical review and input on local and regional development projects, and TA to city departments and community groups
33 WHAT WE DO Transportation

Page 1745 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE DID IN FY
2021-22
• Commenced the on-demand city-wide
shuttle for Richmond residents
• Expanded electric vehicle (EV) charging
stations for increased accessibility and EV
purchases within Richmond
• Reduced the cost of LYFT travel for qualified
seniors and disabled person in Richmond
• Expanded coverage area to and from the
Contra Costa Regional Medical Center &
Veterans Hospital in Martinez, CA
• Implemented a bike share program
• Micro-mobility Services
• Manage electric bikeshare program – June 2021
• Launched Richmond MOVES On-Demand
Shuttle program – April 2022
• Plan to launch several carshare programs
beginning in June 2022
34 Transportation

Page 1746 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PLAN TO DO
IN FY 2022-23
• Update the Community Benefit Ordinance • Reduce vehicle emissions in the City of Richmond • Expand existing micro-mobility services (i.e. bikeshare, Richmond MOVES, and carshare) to
underserved communities
• Implement strategies to update the Civic Center
Plaza parking plan to provide efficient use and
enhanced security for city employees, fleet
vehicles and visitors
• Increase electric vehicle charging station
installations in public areas
• Continue to provide free or low-costs
transportation services to eligible seniors and
disabled populations
• Expand outreach regarding transportation options • Pursue grant opportunities to support the development and implementation of
transportation-related strategies
• Support the reinstatement of parking enforcement
to help support the success of existing parking
programs
• Adopt a City Electrification Plan • Support the transition of Richmond’s City fleet from gas to electric vehicles
35 Transportation

Page 1747 of 1760 ends

WHO WE ARE (STAFF)
Positions
FY21-22
Mid-Year
FY22-23
Proposed
Paratransit Driver 2 2
Paratransit Driver
Leadworker 1 1
Project Manager I/II 2 2
Total Full-Time
Equivalent (FTEs) 5.0 5.0
36 Transportation

Page 1748 of 1760 ends

WHAT WE PROPOSE (BUDGET)
37 FY22-23 DRAFT BUDGET
FY2021-22
Mid-Year
FY2022-23
Proposed
Revenue Licenses, Permits, Fees 27,000 35,000
Other Revenue 10,000 89,000
Grants 2,743,800 2,627,692
Total Revenue 2,780,800 2,751,692
Expenditures Salaries & Wages 345,137 347,511
Benefits 409,099 321,654
Professional & Admin 2,019,000 5,900,095
Other Operating 30,050 26,700
Utilities 2,500 2,500
Equipment & Contract
Services 10,100 29,097
Cost Pool 248,819 819,190
Asset Capital Outlay 1,000 2,000
Total Expenditures 3,065,705 7,448,747
Net Impact (284,905) 4,697,055
Transportation

Page 1749 of 1760 ends

AMERICAN

RESCUE PLAN ACT
(ARPA) BUDGET

UPDATES
38 Page 1750 of 1760
American Rescue Plan Act FY 21-22 Budget
39 *Additional $7,487.59 received in interest through December 2021 Update through April 15, 2022

ARPA BUDGET ACTUAL ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING DEPARTMENT
ARPA REVENUE -TOTAL $(27,740,723) $(13,870,362) $ - $(13,870,362) Project Code ARPA EXPENDITURES
AR231 MAIN LIBRARY - HVAC IMPROVEMENTS $ 500,000 $ - $ 48,000 $ 452,000 Public Works AR232 NEVIN COMMUNITY CENTER - HVAC IMPROVEMENTS $ 500,000 $ 10,250 $ 39,750 $ 450,000 Public Works AR233 RECREATION CENTER ADMINISTRATION - HVAC IMPROVEMENTS $ 500,000 $ 25,025 $ 23,975 $ 451,000 Public Works AR234 RICHMOND MUSEUM - HVAC IMPROVEMENTS $ 500,000 $ - $ 32,600 $ 467,400 Public Works AR235 COMMUNITY BEAUTIFACTION $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 Public Works $ -
AR236 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT $ 250,000 $ - $ 245,485 $ 4,515 Community Services AR237 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CONSULTANT $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 Economic Development AR238 HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES/RICHMOND RAPID RESPONSE FUND $ 1,000,000 $ 15,889 $ 184,111 $ 800,000 Community Development AR239 RECOVERY OF LOST REVENUE $ 4,000,000 $ - $ - $ 4,000,000 Finance AR240 NORTH RICHMOND PUMP STATION $ 1,800,000 $ - $ - $ 1,800,000 Public Works AR241 MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PARK TURF FIELD $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 Public Works Total - ARPA FY2021-22 $ 10,500,000 $ 51,164 $ 573,921 $ 9,874,915 REMAINING ARPA ALLOCATION $(17,240,723)
AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FY 21-22 BUDGET

Page 1751 of 1760 ends

American Rescue Plan Act
North Richmond Pump Station
$1,800,000
HVAC Upgrades at 4 City Facilities
$2,000,000
Community Beautification
$1,000,000
Green-Blue Deal
$300,000
40 Page 1752 of 1760
ARPA Community Needs Assessment - $250,000
Interviews
www.richmond.ca.us/ARPA
Community Input on Investing ~$17 Million in COVID Recovery Funds Strategic Investment Plan
Surveys
Community Meetings Focus Groups
Community Input
41

Page 1753 of 1760 ends

Martin Luther King, Jr.

Park Turf Field -
$150,000
JOIN US!
Official Reopening
Ceremony
 Wednesday, May 18th
 5 PM – 7 PM
42 Page 1754 of 1760
Housing & Richmond Rapid Response Fund (R3F)
$1,000,000
 Housing and Development Initiatives - $300,000
 Homelessness Strategic Plan - $50,000
 Housing Element & Housing Equity Roadmap
- $150,000
 To Be Determined - $100,000
 Community Development & R3F - $100,000
 R3F Governance structure and strategic
planning
 R3F - $600,000
 COVID relief and recovery
 Direct disbursements to individuals via
community organizations
 Rent relief paid directly to landlords
43 Page 1755 of 1760

REIMAGINING

PUBLIC SAFETY

TASK FORCE

RECOMMENDED

INTERVENTIONS
44 Page 1756 of 1760

SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
45

Page 1757 of 1760 ends

FY 2021-22 BUDGET
Update through April 15, 2022
Project Code ITEM BUDGET ACTUAL ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING DEPARTMENT RI220 YouthWORKS (through December 2021/January 2022) $ 1,980,000 $ 510,672 $ - $ 1,469,328 Employment & Training Admin Labor (July - January 2022) $ 7,408
Payroll Service Fees (July - December 2021) $ 8,912
Participant Allowance (July - December 2021) $ 8,284
Intern Wages (July - December 2021) $ 36,096
Direct Labor (July - December 2021) $ 83,659
Overhead Labor (July - January 2022) $ 26,824
Operating Cost (July - January 2022) $ 2,750
Participant Wages (July - December 2021) $ 336,739
RI210 ONS $ 1,600,000 $ - $ - $ 1,600,000 ONS
RI160 UNHOUSED INTERVENTION $ 1,800,000 $ 244,891 $ 739,084 $ 816,025 Planning Rebuilding Together (Providing Outreach and Support)
Richmond Sanitary Services (Clean-up)
RI200 COMMUNITY CRISIS RESPONSE $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 Fire Total - Reimagining FY2021-22 Expenditures $ 6,380,000 $ 755,564 $ 739,084 $ 4,885,353 REIMAGINING PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNITY TASK FORCE FY 21-22 BUDGET 46

Page 1758 of 1760 ends

YOUTHWORKS
$1.98 Million
Community Crisis Response
$1 Million
Office of Neighborhood Safety
$1.6 Million
Unhoused Intervention
$1.8 Million
47

Page 1759 of 1760 ends

THANK YOU!

QUESTIONS
48 Page 1760 of 1760

Richmond City CouncilMay 17, 2022

Richmond City Council
May 17, 2022