Agenda — Richmond City Council, June 21, 2022 (part 12 of 16)

Budget Glossary

Transfers between fiscal years represent the carry forward of funds received in previous years to be expended in the new year and appear as revenue in the new year. Transfers between departments, funds or from one fiscal year to another must be approved by City Council.

Transfers In/Out: Payments from one fund to another fund, primarily for work or services provided.

Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT): The TOT at 10% is imposed on and paid by the hotel/motel lodgers who stay less than thirty days. The tax is collected and remitted by hotel/motel operators.

Triple Flip State: On July 1, 2004 the State began reducing the Sales Tax Allocation to Cities by .25%. The .25% reduction was used for security for the State’s “Economy Recovery Bonds”. This was replaced dollar-for-dollar by an allocation of local property tax from the County Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) funds paid to the Cities in two payments in January and May.

Trust and Agency Funds: Also known as Fiduciary Fund Types, these funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity or as an agent for private individuals, organizations, or other governmental agencies. The fiduciary funds used by the City include expendable trust and agency funds. Expendable trust funds are accounted for in the same manner as Governmental Funds (general, special revenues, debt service, and capital project funds). Agency funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not measure the results of operations.

Urban Transportation Planning System (UTPS): Is a tool for multi -modal transportation planning developed by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (now the Federal Transit Administration) and the Federal Highway Administration. It is use d for both long and short-range planning, particularly system analysis and covers both computerized and manual planning methods. UTPS consists of computer programs, attendant documentation, user guides and manuals that cover one or more of five analytical categories: highway network analysis, transit network analysis, demand estimation, data capture and manipulation, and sketch planning.

Utilities: Generally referring to any outside service agency, including but not limited to, public and private utilities, public transportation agencies, postal services, emergency services, city agencies, and railroads.

Utility Users Tax (UUT): A 10% tax imposed on utility (telecommunication, gas, electricity, water and video) revenue.

304

Page 1824 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Vehicle License Fee (VLF) Backfill: In FY2004, the State dropped the Motor VLF from 2% to .67%. In FY 2004 the State backfilled the fee reduction with other State funds. In fiscal year 2005, the backfill was replaced with an allocation of local property tax from County Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) funds that was paid to the Cities in two payments in January and May.

Working Capital: Also known as financial position in private sector accounting and in enterprise fund accounting in the public sector, working capital is the excess of current assets over current liabilities. For the enterprise funds, this term is used interchangeably with "fund balance”, a comparable financial position concept in the governmental fund types.

X
There are no terms at this time.

Y
There are no terms at this time.

Zero Base Budget : A process emphasizing management's responsibility to plan, budget, and evaluate. Zero-base budgeting provides for analysis of alternative methods of operation and various levels of effort. It places new programs on an equal fo oting with existing programs by requiring that program priorities be ranked, thereby providing a systematic basis for allocating resources.

305

Page 1825 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

List of Acronyms

AV
ADA
Assessed Valuation
Americans with Disabilities Act
A/P Accounts Payable
A/R Accounts Receivable
CAFR Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
CAG Community Advisory Group
CalPERS California Public Employees' Retirement System
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CBD Central Business District
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFD Community Facility District
CIP Capital Improvement Plan
CMP Congestion Management Program
CMS Congestion Management System
COG Council of Governments
COR City of Richmond
CPA Certified Public Accountant
CPI Consumer Price Index
CPUC California Public Utility Commission
CRE County Road Engineer
CTC California Transportation Commission
DBE Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
306

Page 1826 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

D/C Demand Capacity Ratio
DEMO Demonstration Funds
DSMP District System Management Plan
DOT Department of Transportation
EAP Environmental Protection Agency
ECIA
EEO
Environmental and Community Investment Agreement
Equal Employment Opportunity
EIR Environmental Impact Report
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
ERAF Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact
FTE Full-Time Equivalent
FTIP Federal Transportation Improvement Program
GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GL General Ledger
HCM Highway Capacity Manual
HOV High Occupancy Vehicle
HR Human Resources
HUD Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development IRRS Interregional Road System
ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
IT Information Technology
307

Page 1827 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

ITS Intelligent Transportation System
ITSP Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan
LAIF Local Agency Investment Fund
LOS Level of Service
LTFP Long-term Financial Plan
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
MTIP Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NHS National Highway System
NOC Notice of Completion
NOD Notice of Determination
NOI Notice of Intent
NOP Notice of Preparation
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
OPEB Other Post-Employment Benefits
PAF Personnel Action Form
PO Purchase Order
PR Purchase Requisition
Precon Pre-construction Conference
PSR Project Study Report
RFP Request for Proposal
RFQ Request for Qualification
ROD Record of Decision
308

Page 1828 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

ROPS Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules
ROW Right-of-Way
RPTTP Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund
SEC Security and Exchange Commission
STIP State Transportation Improvement Plan
SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TOT Transient Occupancy Tax
UTPS Urban Transportation Planning System
UUT Utility Users Tax
VLF Vehicle License Fee

309

Page 1829 of 2511 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ____

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FISCAL YEARS 2022-23 THROUGH 2026-27 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET FOR

THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
___________________________________________

WHEREAS, a balanced Budget for the City of Richmond has been prepared for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and presented to the City Council pursuant to Article IV, Section 1 ( b) of the Charter of the City of Richmond; and

WHEREAS, a Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 20 22-23 through 2026-27 has been prepared; and

WHEREAS, the budget for the Capital Improvement Funds for the 20 22-23 Fiscal Year has been prepared; and

WHEREAS, all appropriations for the prior fiscal year shall lapse at the end of Fiscal Year 20 21-22 and any remaining amounts shall be credit ed against their respective fund balances, except for:

a. Any unexpected but encumbered amounts or specific orders outstanding at the end of the Fiscal Year; and

b. Any app ropriations for incomplete capital projects including the Municipal Sewer District at the end of Fiscal Year 2021-22; and

WHEREAS, for these exceptions, such carry -overs may be made without any further City Council action; and

WHEREAS, the City Council needs to approve the following expenditures for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Capital Improvement budget:

a. Project expenditures in the amount of $37,256,854 for the Fiscal Year FY2022-23 of the Capital Improvement Plan.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Richmond hereby (1) approves the Capital Impro vement Plan for Fiscal Years 202 2-23 through 2026-27; (2) adopts the budget for the Capital Improvement Funds for the 20 22-23 Fiscal Year; and (3) authorizes the City Manager to place appropriations and estimated revenues in effect on July 1, 2022 and as shown in the FY2022-23 Capital Improvement Budget.

----------------------------------------------

Page 1830 of 2511 ends

I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution of the Council of the City o f Richmond was duly passed and adopted at the regular meeting thereof held June ____, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

_____________________________________
Clerk of the City of Richmond
(SEAL)

Approved:

_______________________________________
Mayor

Approved as to form:

________________________________________
City Attorney

Page 1831 of 2511 ends

Richmond City Council

Tom Butt
Mayor

Eduardo Martinez
Vice Mayor

Nathaniel Bates
Councilmember

Claudia Jimenez
Councilmember

Demnlus Johnson
Councilmember

Gayle McLaughlin
Councilmember

Melvin Willis
Councilmember
1

Page 1832 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2

Page 1833 of 2511 ends

CITY OFFICIALS

CITY COUNCIL

Mayor ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Tom Butt

Vice Mayor ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Eduardo Martinez

Councilmember ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Nathaniel Bates

ADMINISTRATION AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT

City Manager ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Shasa Curl

Deputy City Manager, Internal Services, (Interim)… .................................................................................................................................................................................. Anil Comelo

City Attorney ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Dave Aleshire

City Clerk ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Pamela Christian

Director of Community Development ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... Lina Velasco

Director of Information Technology ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... Sue Hartman

Director of Library and Community Services (Interim) ......................................................................................................................................................................... LaShonda White

Director of Finance................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Delmy Cuellar

Fire Chief ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Angel Montoya

Human Resources Director (Acting) .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Teresa Fairbank

Police Chief (Interim) .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Louie Tirona

Director of Public Works ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Joe Leach

Page 1834 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
4

Page 1835 of 2511 ends

CITY OF RICHMOND

FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET

BUDGET TEAM

Shasa Curl
City Manager

Anil Comelo
Deputy City Manager (Interim)

Delmy Cuellar
Director of Finance

LaShonda White
Interim Library & Community
Services Director

Antonio Banuelos
Accounting Manager

Bertram Jones
Budget Analyst II

Cher Lor-Arce
Budget Analyst II

Rita Martinez
Senior Accountant

Mubeen Qader
Budget Administrator

Vrenesia Ward
Senior Budget Analyst

Jerry Gurule
Senior Accountant

Patrick Seals
Internal Services

Sharrone Taylor
Human Resources

Page 1836 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
6

Page 1837 of 2511 ends

T h e C i t y o f R i c h m o n d s h a l l p r o v i d e s e r v i c e s t h a t e n h a n c e e c o n o m i c v i t a l i t y , t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a n d t h e q u a l i t y o f l i f e o f o u r c o m m u n i t y .

H o n e s t y
E x c e l l e n t C u s t o m e r S e r v i c e
T e a m w o r k
C o m m i t m e n t
I n n o v a t i o n , C r e a t i v i t y a n d
R i s k - T a k i n g
R i c h m o n d w i l l d e v e l o p a l l o f i t s n e i g h b o r h o o d s a n d b u s i n e s s e s a s q u a l i t y p l a c e s t o l i v e , w o r k , s h o p a n d p l a y , w i t h i t s 3 2 m i l e s o f s h o r e l i n e s a s a w i d e l y r e c o g n i z e d s y m b o l o f t h e C i t y ’ s s u c c e s s .

V I S I O N

C I T Y O F R I C H M O N D

V A L U E S
7

Page 1838 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
8

Page 1839 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
24

Page 1840 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Projects
FY2022-23 Budget
RMRA Engineering Capital Outla y Improvements
Gas Tax SB1 Grants Fund Measure C/J Total
FUND 1002 1019 1054 2001 2002
Estimated Beginning Balance 07/01/2022 821,148 2,198,952 (11,784,027) 3,061,487 771,169 (4,931,271) Revenues
Federal Grant Revenue 3,892,635 3,892,635
Other Grant Revenue 580,910 2,992,882 3,573,792 State and Local Taxes 3,203,193 2,510,376 1,300,000 7,013,569 State Grant Revenue 10,036,233 10,036,233
Total Revenues 3,203,193 2,510,376 14,509,778 - 4,292,882 24,516,229 Expenditures
Public Works Department
13TH STREET COMPLETE 793,870 793,870

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
MISCELLANEOUS SIDEWALK REPAIRS 36,105 294,065 330,170 ATP QUICK BUILD - CUTTING/HOFFMAN 625,212 625,212 ATP QUICK BUILD - HARBOUR WAY SOUTH 184,300 184,300 BOORMAN PARK REVITALIZATION 3,490,204 3,490,204 BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 248,340 1,875,803 2,124,143 CARLSON BLVD. CROSSTOWN CONNECTIONS AND
IMPROVEMENTS 398,410 398,410

CORPORATION YARD BATHROOM REMODEL AND
FUEL SITE UPGRADES 399,000 399,000
FIRE STATION 66 - GENDER SPECIFIC RESTROOM 275,052 275,052 GREENING THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD 351,769 351,769 GREENWAY REHAB AND BIKE EDUCATION 27,310 100,000 127,310 HARBOUR 8 PARK EXPANSION 6,194,260 6,194,260 HARBOUR WAY & WRIGHT SECTION 130 1,199,075 1,199,075 HARBOUR WAY IMPROVEMENT 82,500 82,500
HILLTOP FIRE STATION FUEL SYSTEM 50,000 50,000 I-80 CENTRAL INTERCHANGE PHASE II 2,199,012 2,199,012 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. CENTER 267,692 267,692 MEMBERSHIP DUES (West Contra Costa Transportation
Advisory Committee and Contra Costa Transportation
Authority) 200,000 200,000
NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER 50,000 50,000 PARKS YARD FUEL SITE SYSTEM UPGRADES 220,000 220,000 S. RICHMOND TRANSIT CONNECTIVITY
IMPROVEMENT 65,000 65,000
S.F. BAY TRAIL PT. MOLATE 646,703 646,703 SHIMADA PARK RESTROOM 240,790 240,790
25

Page 1841 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Projects
FY2022-23 Budget
RMRA Engineering Capital Outla y Improvements
Gas Tax SB1 Grants Fund Measure C/J Total
FUND 1002 1019 1054 2001 2002
STREET AUDIT REPORT 4,000 4,000
STREET PAVING 2,500,000 2,500,000
STREET PAVING - SB1 - 37TH STREET 300,000 300,000
STREET PAVING - SB1 - CASTRO RANCH RD 329,168 329,168 STREET PAVING - SB1 - CUTTING BLVD. AND HARBOUR WAY SOUT 706,308 706,308 STREET PAVING - SB1 - MARINA WAY 59,861 59,861
STREET PAVING - SB1 - RICHMOND PARKWAY 1,000,000 1,000,000 SURFACE DRAINAGE 300,000 300,000
YELLOW BRICK ROAD 8,245 8,245
Sub-Total - Public Works Department 2,815,755 2,395,337 14,509,778 2,214,237 3,786,947 25,722,054 Public Works Projects - Chevron Settlement Agreement 2018-19 AUDITORIUM UPGRADES (Main floor lighting, electrical &
switch board upgrade, and remove curtains from stage
area) 500,000 500,000
RECREATION COMPLEX HVAC 120,000 120,000
SHIELDS-REID COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC 127,250 127,250 Sub-Total - Public Works Projects - Chevron
Settlement Agreement 2018-19 - - 747,250 - 747,250 Community Services
DEVELOPING PERSONAL RESOURCES CENTER 100,000 100,000 Sub-Total - Community Services Department - - 100,000 - 100,000 Total Expenditures 2,815,755 2,395,337 14,509,778 3,061,487 3,786,947 26,569,304 Transfers in from: -
-
Total transfers in - - - - - - Transfers out to:

Total transfers out - - - - - Net transfers in/out - - - - - Net Surplus/Deficit 387,438 115,039 - (3,061,487) 505,935 (2,053,075) Projected Ending Balance 6/30/2023 1,208,586 2,313,991 (11,784,027) - 1,277,104 (6,984,346) 26

Page 1842 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Projects
FY2022-23 Budget
Asset Outside Police Fire Rec/Aquatics Improvements
Seizure Grants Impact Fee Impact Fee Impact Fee Total
FUND 1004 1006 2114 2113 2115
Estimated Beginning Balance 07/01/2022 326,963 (415,256) 580,957 89,515 513,506 1,095,685 Revenues
Federal Grant Revenue 20,000 611,164 631,164 Other Grant Revenue -
State and Local Taxes -
State Grant Revenue 6,704,813 6,704,813
Total Revenues 20,000 7,315,977 - - - 7,335,977 Expenditures
Police Department
POLICE - ASSET RECOVERY EQUIPMENT - DOOR BREACH TOOLS 20,000 20,000 POLICE - EDWARD BYRNE JUSTICE GRANT 2019 63,333 63,333 POLICE - EDWARD BYRNE JUSTICE GRANT 2020 60,794 60,794 POLICE - PEER SUPPORT ENHANCEMENT 40,000 40,000 POLICE - SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM 235,000 235,000 Sub-Total Police 20,000 399,127 - - - 419,127 Fire Department
FIRE - NON CAPITAL/REPLACE TURNOUT AND SAFETY EQUIPMENT FOR NEW STAFF 89,383 89,383 Sub-Total Fire - - - 89,383 89,383 ONS Department
ONS - PROF & ADMIN - CALIFORNIA VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PREVENTION (CALVIP) 565,000 565,000 ONS - PROF & ADMIN YOUTH REINVESTMENT 335,000 335,000 Sub-Total ONS 900,000 - - - 900,000 -
Public Works Department
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. (MLK) PARK TURF FIELD REPLACEMENT 234,000 234,000 Sub-total Public Works Department 234,000 - - - 234,000 27

Page 1843 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Projects
FY2022-23 Budget
Asset Outside Police Fire Rec/Aquatics Improvements
Seizure Grants Impact Fee Impact Fee Impact Fee Total
FUND 1004 1006 2114 2113 2115
Expenditures - continued
Community Services Department
PROF & ADMIN/17-18 NRMF - BEATUFICATION 1,037 1,037 PROF & ADMIN/COOLING CENTER 100,000 100,000
PROF & ADMIN/NEVIN AND SHIELDS-REID RESILIENCE 100,000 100,000 Sub-Total Community Services - 201,037 - - - 201,037 Economic Development Department
CA ENERGY COM PHASE II (TWO YEAR TERM EMPLOYEE) 265,715 265,715 CALRECYCLE BEV CONTAINER 27,482 27,482
CALRECYCLE SB 1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE 146,235 146,235 CANNABIS EQUITY PROGRAM 1,319,360 1,319,360
TERMINAL 4 WHARF REMOVAL 3,401,288 3,401,288
Sub-Total Economic Development 5,160,080 - - - 5,160,080 Transportation Department
TRANSPORTATION - BIKE SHARE PROGRAM (STAFF TIME) 52,000 52,000 TRANSPORTATION - CEC PHASE II EV READY COMM P2 GRANT 554,949 554,949 TRANSPORTATION - MTC NYSTROM VILLAGE HUB 261,646 261,646 TRANSPORTATION - ON DEMAND SHUTTLE 900,000 900,000 Sub-Total - Transportation 1,768,595 - - - 1,768,595 Total Expenditures 20,000 8,662,839 - 89,383 - 8,772,222 Transfers in from:

Total transfers in - - - - - - Transfers out to:

Total transfers out - - - - - - Net transfers in/out -- -
Net Surplus/Deficit - (1,346,862) - (89,383) - (1,436,245) Projected Ending Balance 6/30/2023 326,963 (1,762,118) 580,957 132 513,506 (340,560) 28

Page 1844 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Projects
FY2022-23 Budget
Facility
Park Traffic Open Space Librar y Storm Drainage Wastewater Improvements Impact Fee Impact Fee Impact Fee Impact Fee Impact Fee Impact Fee Total FUND 2110 2111 2116 2117 2119 2120
Estimated Beginning Balance 07/01/2022 155,227 827,924 2,933,763 1,657,170 798,011 1,467,086 7,839,181 Revenues
Fees -
Total Revenues - - - - - - - Expenditures
Public Works Department
JPA SPORTS FIELD AGREEMENT 15,000 15,000
PT MOLATE BAY TRAIL 373,264 373,264
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENT 263,639 263,639
Sub-total Public Works Department 15,000 263,639 373,264 - - - 651,903 Library & Cultural Services Department
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) RAMP MAIN LIBRARY STAFF ENTRANCE 30,000 30,000 LIBRARY - CAP OUTLAY/AUTO EQUIPMENT >5,000 (NEW DELIVERY VAN AND NEW BOOKMOBILE 140,000 140,000 LIBRARY - NONCAP ASSET/COMPUTER HARDWARE 68,161 68,161 LIBRARY - NONCAP ASSET/COMPUTER SOFTWARE <5K 3,500 3,500 LIBRARY - NONCAP ASSET/FURNITURE <5K 130,000 130,000 LIBRARY - NONCAP ASSET/OTHER EQUIPMENT 42,634 42,634 LIBRARY - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (GRANT WRITER & DESIGN CONSULTANT) 55,000 55,000 Sub-total - Library & Cultural Services - - - 469,295 - - 469,295 Public Works - Wastewater
MANHOLE REHABILITATION 794,130 794,130
Sub-total - Public Works Wastewater 794,130 794,130 Total Expenditures 15,000 263,639 373,264 469,295 - 794,130 1,915,328 Transfers out to:

Total transfers out - - - - - Net transfers in/out - - - - Net Surplus/Deficit (15,000) (508,000) (373,264) (469,295) - (794,130) (1,915,328) Projected Ending Balance 6/30/2023 140,227 319,924 2,560,499 1,187,875 798,011 672,956 5,923,853 29

Page 1845 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Projects
FY2022-23 Budget
Hilltop Impact Improvements
Harbor Fee Total
FUND 2007 2118
Estimated Beginning Balance 07/01/2022 45,393 31,516 4,080,504 Revenues
Interest
Fees
State and Local Taxes
Other Revenue
Uses of Money & Property
Total Revenues - 31,852,206
-
Total Expenditures - 37,256,854
Transfers in from:

Total transfers in - -
Transfers out to:

Total transfers out - -
Net transfers in/out - -
Net Surplus/Deficit - (5,404,648)
Projected Ending Balance 6/30/2023 45,393 31,516 (1,324,144) 30

Page 1846 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Projects
Enterprise, Internal Services, and Other Operations Funds FY2022-23 Budget
Port Wastewater Marina KCRT Equipment Total
4001 4003 4005 4008 5003
Estimated Beginning Balance 07/01/2022 11,588,088 14,830,208 4,162,408 976,705 3,100,141 34,657,550 Revenues
Fees 36,000 1,250,000 1,286,000
Fines & Forfeitures 2,000 2,000
Rental Income 10,348,460 450,000 10,798,460
Charges for Services 26,905,520 5,546,018 32,451,538 Loan Proceeds 20,000,000 20,000,000
Total Revenues 10,348,460 46,943,520 450,000 1,250,000 5,546,018 64,537,998 Expenditures
Port
BERTH ELECTRIFICATION 750,000 750,000
PPMT ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE 100,000 100,000
PPMT GENERAL UPGRADES 250,000 250,000
RIGGERS LOFT MAINTENANCE 150,000 150,000
Port Operations 7,314,055 7,314,055
Sub-Total - Port Department 8,564,055 - - - - 8,564,055 Water Resource Recovery - Wastewater
DORNAN DRIVE FORCE MAIN 4,000,000 4,000,000
FERRY POINT DORNAN DRIVE PUMP STATION 375,000 375,000 FLEET REPLACEMENT CCTV TRUCK 515,000 515,000
FLOOD RISK REDUCTION RHEEM CREEK WATERSHED 1,598,844 1,598,844 GRIT & AERATION (SRF) 20,000,000 20,000,000
MARINA BAY FORCE MAIN RELOCATION 350,000 350,000 PIPELINE SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT 3,325,000 3,325,000 SANITARY SEWER POINT REPAIRS 475,000 475,000
WWTP CO-GENERATION 1,461,280 1,461,280
WWTP DECHLORINATION SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 3,250,000 3,250,000 WWTP SEISMIC RETROFIT 325,000 325,000
WWTP SLUDGE THICKENER 630,061 630,061
Wastewater Operations 23,212,632 23,212,632
Sub-Total - Water Resource Recovery - Wastewater Departm - 59,517,817 - - 59,517,817 31Page 1847 of 2511
City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Projects
Enterprise, Internal Services, and Other Operations Funds FY2022-23 Budget
Port Wastewater Marina KCRT Equipment Total
4001 4003 4005 4008 5003
Public Works
AREA FM CAP 929,161 929,161
Marina Operations 293,593 293,593
Sub-Total - Public Works - - 1,222,754 - - 1,222,754 KCRT
ENIGNIEERING (Microwave Transmission & Playback System) 120,000 120,000 KCRT Operations 1,155,168 1,155,168
Sub-Total - KCRT - - 1,275,168 - 1,275,168 Equipment Services
FIRE VEHICLES 810,000 810,000
OTHER CITY VEHICLES 3,305,000 3,305,000
OTHER CITY EQUIPMENT 100,000 100,000
POLICE VEHICLES 1,451,000 1,451,000
Equipment Services - Debt Service - Fire 326,018 326,018 Sub-total - Equipment Services - - 5,992,018 5,992,018 Information Technology
DESKTOP REFRESH 100,000 100,000
Sub-total - Information Technology 100,000 100,000
Total Expenditures 8,564,055 59,517,817 1,222,754 1,275,168 6,092,018 76,671,812 Transfers in from: -
General Fund for Equipment 100,000 100,000
General Fund for Debt Service 326,018 326,018
Total transfers in - - 426,018 426,018 Transfers out to:

General Fund 86,778 86,778
Total transfers out - - 86,778 - - 86,778 Net transfers in/out - - (86,778) - 426,018 339,240 Net Surplus/Deficit 1,784,405 (12,574,297) (859,532) (25,168) (119,982) (11,794,574) Projected Ending Balance 6/30/2023 13,372,493 2,255,911 3,302,876 951,537 2,980,159 22,862,976 32

Page 1848 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Projects
Housing Department and Other Operations Funds
FY2022-23 Budget
CDBG ECI A ARPA Total
1201 1017 1306
Estimated Beginning Balance 07/01/2022 1,281,334 20,631,055 13,834,443 35,746,832 Revenues
Interest
Interest and Investment Income 26,677 26,677 Federal Grants 2,770,400 2,770,400
State Grants -
Other Grants 275,842 275,842
Loan/Bond Proceeds 149,898 149,898
Total Revenues 176,575 275,842 2,770,400 3,222,817 Expenditures
Public Works Department
YELLOW BRICK ROAD 1,313,655 1,313,655
URBAN FORESTRY 123,842 123,842
APRA/MAIN LIBRARY 452,000 452,000
ARPA/ COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT 150,000 150,000 ARPA/NEVIN CENTER 450,000 450,000
ARPA/RAPID RESPONSE 800,000 800,000
ARPA/RECREATION CENTER 451,000 451,000
ARPA/RICHMOND MUSEUM 467,400 467,400
ECIA Operations 9,486,735 9,486,735
Sub-Total - Public Works Department - 10,924,232 2,770,400 13,694,632 Community Services Capital
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) BOOKER T. ANDERSON (BTA) 4 85,000 485,000 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) PARCHESTER CENTER 450,000 450,000 CDBG Operations 46,745 46,745
Sub-Total - Community Services Department Capital 981,745 - - 981,745 33

Page 1849 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Projects
Housing Department and Other Operations Funds
FY2022-23 Budget
CDBG ECI A ARPA Total
1201 1017 1306
Total Expenditures 981,745 10,924,232 2,770,400 14,676,377 Transfers in from: -
-
Total transfers in - - - Transfers out to:

Other Operatiosns -
Total transfers out - - - - Net transfers in/out - - - - Net Surplus/Deficit (805,170) (10,648,390) - (11,453,560) Projected Ending Balance 6/30/2023 476,164 9,982,666 13,834,443 24,293,272 34

Page 1850 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Unfunded Request FY2022/23 to FY2026/27
Project Title Proposed
FY2022-23
Proposed
FY2023-24
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed
FY2025-26
Proposed
FY2026-27
*Fiscal Year
Not Yet
Assigned
Total
Public Works Department
Corporation Yard . roof replacement building/B 350,000$ 350,000$ Corporation Yard Facility Relocate 10,000,000$ 10,000,000$ Crosswalk Improvements 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 600,000$ Fairmede Soccer Field 45,000$ 217,500$ 262,500$ Martin Luther King (MLK) Jr. Community Center 1,000,000$ 13,000,000$ 14,000,000$ Playground restorations citywide 500,000$ 500,000$ 1,000,000$ Pullman Neighborhood Park Additions 105,000$ 125,000$ 230,000$ Replace two existing 2000 gls Fuel Tanks 250,000$ 250,000$ Street Sweeping Signs at Richmond Annex 250,000$ 250,000$ Wendell Park Renovations 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$
ADA Facilities needs . ADA Improvements/priorities 1,2,3 10,000,000$ 10,000,000$ ADA Ramps . ADA/Ramps 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$
Art Center . Upgrade existing HVAC/system 500,000$ 500,000$ Corporation Yard . replacement of fence greenway/only 135,000$ 135,000$ Corporation Yard . two additional heavy duty/lifts 65,000$ 65,000$ Corporation Yard . yr equipment replacement/thru 2026 20,000,000$ 20,000,000$ Marina Park . Park lighting LED/conversion 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ Native American Health Center 150,000$ 150,000$
Nicholl Park . Park lighting system/upgrade 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ Nicholl Park . Upgrade existing lighting/system 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ Pedestrian Signal . Install Pedestrian/Signals 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ Richmond Parkway 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,500,000$ Richmond Transit Center . Roof/Repairs 250,000$ 250,000$ Traffic Signals LED light repla. . Replace traffic signal LED/lights 250,000$ 250,000$ Unfunded Public Works - Total 3,650,000$ 12,992,500$ 14,650,000$ 1,150,000$ 42,850,000$ 75,292,500$ Police Department
New Police Facility 2,000,000$ 78,000,000$ 80,000,000$ Unfunded Police Department - Total 2,000,000$ 78,000,000$ -$ 80,000,000$ 35

Page 1851 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Unfunded Request FY2022/23 to FY2026/27
Project Title Proposed
FY2022-23
Proposed
FY2023-24
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed
FY2025-26
Proposed
FY2026-27
*Fiscal Year
Not Yet
Assigned
Total
Fire Department
Fire Station 66 Gender Specific Restroom 600,000$ 600,000$ Replace Station 66 8,000,000$ 8,000,000$
Replace Station 67 8,000,000$ 8,000,000$
Training Tower at New Facility 800,000$ 800,000$ Unfunded Fire Department - Total 600,000$ 16,000,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ 17,400,000$ Library Department
Architectural Design of New Library 2,790,000$ 2,790,000$ Community Room Entrance 45,000$ 45,000$
Configure Manager's Office Upstairs 35,000$ 35,000$ Heating and Cooling System 100,000$ 100,000$
Main Library Floor 600,000$ 600,000$
Main Library Reading Room Updates - Lighting 100,000$ 100,000$ New Library 23,500,000$ 23,500,000$ 47,000,000$
Outside Book Return Bins 45,000$ 45,000$
Replace/Upgrade Elevator 450,000$ 450,000$
Main Library Staff Entrance Ramp . Employee's Entrance ADA/Ramp 350,000$ 350,000$ Main Library . Replace existing/Elevator 400,000$ 400,000$ Unfunded Library Department - Total 1,375,000$ 2,790,000$ 23,500,000$ 23,500,000$ 750,000$ 51,915,000$ Community Services Department
Auditorium Lighting System on Stage 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ Parchester Community Center Roof Replacement 250,000$ 250,000$ Replace Windows at the Recreation Complex
(energy efficient) 65,000$ 65,000$
Auditorium . Replace Asbestos Fire/Curtains 500,000$ 500,000$ Auditorium . Auditorium Hallways
Lighting/Improvement 750,000$ 750,000$
Shields Reid Community Center .

HVAC/Improvements 500,000$ 500,000$
Equipment Services . ADA/Improvements 500,000$ 500,000$ Parks Citywide . Playground/Restorations 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ Unfunded Community Services Department - Total 1,815,000$ -$ -$ -$ 4,250,000$ 6,065,000$ 36Page 1852 of 2511
City of Richmond
Capital Unfunded Request FY2022/23 to FY2026/27
Project Title Proposed
FY2022-23
Proposed
FY2023-24
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed
FY2025-26
Proposed
FY2026-27
*Fiscal Year
Not Yet
Assigned
Total
Employment & Training Department
Starlight Building Civic Center Employment and
Training Roof 300,000$ 300,000$
Unfunded Employment & Training Department - Total 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Information Technology Department
Broadband Accessibility Project 500,000$ 500,000$ Computer Replacement/Upgrades 1,473,333$ 1,473,333$ 1,473,333$ 4,420,000$ Fiber Expansion 1,200,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 3,000,000$ Unfunded Information Technology Department - Total 3,173,333$ 2,073,333$ 2,073,333$ 600,000$ -$ 7,920,000$ City Attorney Department
Access Compliance 246,931$ 246,931$ 171,296$ 246,931$ 912,089$ Mid-Block Barriers 560,618$ 560,618$ 560,618$ 1,681,855$ Pedestrian Signals 3,880$ 3,880$ 3,880$ 3,880$ 15,520$ Unfunded City Attorney Department - Total 811,429$ 811,429$ 175,176$ 811,429$ 2,609,464$ Unfunded Request - Total 13,724,763$ 112,667,263$ 41,198,509$ 26,061,429$ 47,850,000$ 241,501,964$ *Assigned by new Public Works Director, budget year not yet determined. 37

Page 1853 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
38

Page 1854 of 2511 ends

Community Services 25

FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Mission
To improve the quality of life in Richmond by celebrating the diversity of our residents and building understanding through interactions in our recreation programs, parks, facilities, and cultural events. The department is committed to providing the highest quality recreation, parks, programs, and services at a good value to our customers.

Overview
The primary function of the Community Service Department is to provide recreation programs and services for all ages and abil ities at community centers and parks.

Clean, functional, safe and attractive facilities are necessary components of our recreation programs and services. These components improve the community through leisure, wellness, education and socialization which assis t in the efforts to mitigate crime and violence in the community.

There are 11 community centers, two aquatics facilities, and one auditorium. We provide programs in youth sports, youth acti vities, aquatics, special events, and adult activities. Additionally, facilities are available for public use to celebrate a diversity of activiti es.

Over the next five years, our plan is to improve all of our recreation facilities to meet today’s standards for quality recreation services.

Youth Participants
Helping in the Park

Special Events

Renovation for Quality, Clean,
Safe Community Facilities
39

Page 1855 of 2511 ends

Community Services 25

FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Plan Highlights
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) – Booker T. Anderson Center ADA Improvements throughout the facility – mandated by state law.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) – Parchester Community Center ADA Improvements throughout the facility – mandated by state law.

Auditorium Convention Center Upgrades
This project includes making upgrades to: the main floor lighting, electrical and switch board, and remove fire curtain from the stage area.

Project Cost: $485,000
Funding Source: CDBG
Project Cost: $450,000
Funding Source: CDBG
Project Cost: $500,000
Funding Source:

General Capital Fund
40

Page 1856 of 2511 ends

TOTAL CIP BUDGET - HISTORICAL COMPARISON
3/31/2022

SOURCES BY FUND
Outside Grant-1006 - -
Housing-1201 971,883 128,997 935,000 935,000
General Capital-2001 768,750 30,960 847,250 847,250 Community/Aquatics Impact Fee-2115 213,782 -
TOTAL SOURCES BY FUND 1,954,415 159,957 1,782,250 - - - - 1,782,250

USES BY PROJECT
American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Booker T. Anderson Community Center 450,000 - 485,000 485,000 American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Parchester Community Center 521,883 128,997 450,000 450,000 American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Shields-Reid Community Center
-
Auditorium Convention Center Upgrades 513,500 8,560 500,000 500,000 Developing Personal Resources Center (DPRC) Roof Repairs 100,000 100,000 100,000 John F. Kennedy (JFK) Swim Center Boiler 213,782 - Nevin Community Center Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Upgrade
-
Recreation Complex HVAC System 120,000 120,000 Recreation Complex Roof Replacement -
Recreation Complex Social Hall Repair and Paint -
Richmond Senior Center Roof Replacement -
Shields-Reid Community Center HVAC Upgrade 155,250 22,400 127,250 127,250 TOTAL USES BY PROJECT 1,954,415 159,957 1,782,250 - - - - 1,782,250

USES BY ORG CODE
Outside Grant-10651051 - - - - - - - - Housing-12138962 971,883 128,997 935,000 - - - - 935,000 General Capital - Recreation-20151051 768,750 30,960 847,250 - - - - 847,250 Community/Aquatics Impact Fee-21551051 213,782 - - - - - - - TOTAL USES BY ORG CODE 1,954,415 159,957 1,782,250 - - - - 1,782,250 FY2021-22
Actual
FY2026-27
Proposed
FY2025-26
Proposed
FY2021-22
Adopted 5 Year TotalFY2022-23
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed
FY2023-24
Proposed
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan
Community Services Department-25
CIP Overview
41

Page 1857 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Community Services
ADA Improvements.

Project ID: 03D06
Project Location: 960 S. 47th Street
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 485,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 485,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 12/31/2023
Mandated by State law.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1201 CDBG -$ 485,000$ 485,000$
Total -$ 485,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 485,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements
Booker T Anderson Center
42

Page 1858 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Community Services
ADA Improvements.

Project ID: 03F06
Project Location: 900 Williams Avenue
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 450,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 450,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: 12/31/2023
Mandated by State law.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1201 CDBG 13,650$ 469,000$ 482,650$
Total 13,650$ 469,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 482,650$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements
Parchester Center
43

Page 1859 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Auditorium Convention Center Upgrades
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Community Services
Project ID: CSA20
Project Location: 403 Civic Center Plaza
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 500,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 500,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: 12/31/2023
This project is needed to comply with safety standards and allow for increased rental revenue.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1201 CDBG 1,157,970$ 1,157,970$
2001 General Capital 121,680$ 500,000$ 621,680$ Total 1,279,650$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,779,650$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

This project includes making upgrades to: the main
floor lighting, electrical and switch board, and remove fire curtain from the stage area.
44

Page 1860 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Developing Personal Resources Center (DPRC)
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Community Services
Replace roof.

Project ID: CSA21
Project Location: 1900 Barrett Avenue
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 100,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 100,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: 12/31/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2001 General Capital 100,000$ 100,000$
-$
Total -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
45

Page 1861 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Community Services
New HVAC System.

Project ID: CSA24
Project Location: 3230 Macdonald Avenue
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 120,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 120,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2019
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2001 General Capital 120,000$ 120,000$
Total -$ 120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Recreation Complex Heating Ventilation and Air
Conditioning (HVAC) System
46

Page 1862 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Community Services
Upgrade existing HVAC System.

Project ID: CSA27
Project Location: 1410 Kelsey Street
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 127,250$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 127,250$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2022
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2001 General Capital 127,250$ 127,250$
Total -$ 127,250$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 127,250$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Shields Reid Center Heating Ventilation and Air
Conditioning (HVAC) Upgrade
47

Page 1863 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
48

Page 1864 of 2511 ends

Information Technology 26 – KCRT Cable TV Division

FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Mission
To “Get Richmond’s Voice Heard” – throughout Richmond, throughout the East Bay, and around the world. The Cable Television Division provides for the 24 -7 operation of the City’s Cable TV station, KCRT. This serves to promote services, events, resources, an d opportunities for the City of Richmond, other regional government agencies, both national and regional non-profit organizations and Cable, and on the web through video streaming.

Overview
Using KCRT, KCOR, the City’s Traffic I nformation & Safety (TIS) AM radio station, and KCRT.com’s video streaming for the web, the Cable Television Division disseminates public information and emergency information from the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) during times of crisis or disaster.

The Cable Television Division monitors the local aspects of the State Cable Franchises, resolves cable disputes, and works with other departments on other Telecom issues that affect Richmond.

KCRT staff provides audio and video technical assistance and training for departments. This includes PowerPoint assessment and assistance, video equipment rental (video cameras, laptop, projector, and screen for display) with training and/or set up assistance. The Division also provides video production for special projects that are not originally slated for air on KCRT.

These include promotional materials and specialty video projects such as training videos for departmental use, and on-air and on-line video.

Working with the City Attorney ’s Office, the Cable Television Division assists other departments with negotiating Telecom leases to gain the best value for the City’s Right -of- Way and Property.

All funding for KCRT’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) comes from Cable Franchise Fees and the PEG (Public-Education-Government) Access Pass-Thru.

Chambers Audio System

Media Center Upgrade

Playback Control System
49

Page 1865 of 2511 ends

Information Technology 26 – KCRT Cable TV Division

FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Plan Highlight
Engineering – Microwave Transmission and Playback Control System Replace Playback system for TV channel, including new server and monitors.

Project Cost: $120,000
Funding Source: Cable
Franchise Fees
50

Page 1866 of 2511 ends

TOTAL CIP BUDGET - HISTORICAL COMPARISON
3/31/2022

SOURCES BY FUND
Information Technology/KCRT-4008 220,000 19,901 120,000 - - - - 120,000 TOTAL SOURCES BY FUND 220,000 19,901 120,000 - - - - 120,000

USES BY PROJECT
220,000 19,901 120,000 120,000
TOTAL USES BY PROJECT 220,000 19,901 120,000 - - - - 120,000

USES BY ORG CODE
KCRT Cable TV-40864281 220,000 19,901 120,000 - - - - 120,000 TOTAL USES BY ORG CODE 220,000 19,901 120,000 - - - - 120,000 Engineering; (Microwave Transmission & Playback
System)
FY2022-23
Proposed
FY2023-24
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed 5 Year Total
FY2021-22
Adopted
FY2025-26
Proposed
FY2021-22
Actual
FY2026-27
Proposed
Information Technology-26
KCRT Cable Television CIP Overview
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan
51

Page 1867 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Multi-Media (Council Chambers & Studio Equipment)
Sue Hartman
Department Responsible: Information Technology - KCRT
Project ID: 06D03
Project Location: Civic Center Plaza
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: -$
Equipment: 120,000$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 120,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2020
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4008 KCRT Ongoing 120,000$ 120,000$ Total -$ 120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
To improve media broadcasting internally and externally with the option of true HD in compliance with current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards.

Replace and update Council Chambers equipment, including cameras and switcher, to HD quality.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
52

Page 1868 of 2511 ends

Public Works 23 - Equipment Services Division

FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Mission
To establish and maintain delivery of fleet services by departments with safe, reliable, economical, environmentally-sound transportation, and related support services that are responsive to the needs of customer departments which conserve the value of the vehicle and equipment investment. Along with the delivery of replacement vehicles and equipment based on the replacement schedule, specifications for acquisition of all vehicles and equipment will be prepared in collaboration with the using departments to ensure said vehicles and equipment are responsive to their needs.

Overview
The Equipment Services Division provides preventive maintenan ce and repair services for all city vehicles and equipment including police and fire. Staff develops vehicle and equipment specifications, solicits bids and participates in the procurement process, completes required build-ups relative to in-service needs, maintains, and finally disposes of all surplus units. Staff maintains a complete and compre hensive computerized fleet management program which tracks operation and maintenance costs and provides the critical information relative to fleet decisions.

Division staff also coordinates compliance with all applicable regulatory agencies associated with government and commercial fleet operations including licensing, inspections, smog and opacity checks, etc. In addition to maintaining the c ity fleet, this d ivision also provides fabricating and welding services for all city departments.

Plan Highlight
Vehicle and Equipment Replacement
This project is to provide annual, timely replacement of vehicles and equipment. Vehicles and equipment will be evaluated and replaced in accordance with serviceable life cycles. Purchases are scheduled each fiscal year.

Fleet Maintenance
Equipment

Street Sweeper
Project Cost: $20,446,336 over
next 5 years
Funding Source: Equipment
Services – Replacement Fund
53

Page 1869 of 2511 ends

TOTAL CIP BUDGET - HISTORICAL COMPARISON
3/31/2022

SOURCES BY FUND
Public Works Equipment Services-
5003 2,858,391 537,756 5,666,000 3,532,900 3,638,887 3,748,054 3,860,495 20,446,336 TOTAL SOURCES BY FUND 2,858,391 537,756 5,666,000 3,532,900 3,638,887 3,748,054 3,860,495 20,446,336

USES BY PROJECT
Fire Vehicles - 03A04 900,000 810,000 448,050 461,492 475,336 489,596 2,684,474 Other City Equipment - 03D04 100,000 103,000 106,090 109,273 112,551 530,914 Other City Vehicles - 03C04 1,152,403 380,593 3,305,000 2,363,850 2,434,766 2,507,808 2,583,043 13,194,467 Police Vehicles - 03B04 805,988 157,163 1,451,000 618,000 636,540 655,636 675,305 4,036,481 TOTAL USES BY PROJECT 2,858,391 537,756 5,666,000 3,532,900 3,638,887 3,748,054 3,860,495 20,446,336

USES BY ORG CODE
Public Works Equipment Services-
50336031 2,858,391 537,756 5,666,000 3,532,900 3,638,887 3,748,054 3,860,495 20,446,336 TOTAL USES BY ORG CODE 2,858,391 537,756 5,666,000 3,532,900 3,638,887 3,748,054 3,860,495 20,446,336 FY2021-22
Adopted
5 Year TotalFY2021-22
Actual
FY2022-23
Proposed
FY2023-24
Proposed
FY2026-27
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed
FY2025-26
Proposed
Public Works Department-23
Equipment Services CIP Overview
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan
54

Page 1870 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Fleet Replacement
Dee Karnes
Department Responsible: Public Works - Equipment Services Fire Vehicles - 03A04 - $810,000
Other City Equipment - 03D04 - 100,000
Other City Vehicles - 03C04 - $3,305,000
Police Vehicles - 03B04 - $1,451,000
Project Location: 6 13th Street
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: -$
Equipment: 5,666,000$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 5,666,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2015
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Project Funding Prio
r FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total
5003 Equipment Services Ongoing 5,666,000$ 3,532,900$ 3,638,887$ 3,748,054$ 3,860,495$ 20,446,336$ Total - $ 5,666,000$ 3,532,900$ 3,638,887$ 3,748,054$ 3,860,495$ 20,446,336$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
The City's vehicles and equipment fleet have a serviceable life cycle. Once reached, the vehicles and equipment need to be replaced to provide the City with safe, efficient and cost-effective transportation.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
55

Page 1871 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
56

Page 1872 of 2511 ends

Economic Development-36
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Mission
To implement City Council policy through effective day -to-day oversight of operating departments, and through the initiation, development, and implementation of programs that provide for the efficient, effective, and equitable delivery of services to all those who live and work in the City of Richmond.

The City Manager’s Office performs specific operational responsibilities in the following areas:
• Council-directed the development of special projects. • Community and economic development.
• Environmental and Community Inves tment Agreement (ECIA) Program development and oversight.
• Environmental initiatives.
• Health in all policies.
• Policy and program development.
• Resident and business issues resolution.
• Transportation and transit connectivity.

Plan Highlight
Area FM CAP
To meet state regulator Department of Toxic Substances Control ( DTSC) requirements to clear and cap former WWII shipbuilding contaminated site owned by City of Richmond. .

Solar Big Belly Trash
Compactor
Project Cost: $929,161
Funding Source:

General Capital
57

Page 1873 of 2511 ends

TOTAL CIP BUDGET - HISTORICAL COMPARISON
3/31/2022

SOURCES BY FUND
General Capital-2001 428,683 306,345 - - - - Marina-4005 946,161 929,161 929,161
TOTAL SOURCE BY FUND 1,374,844 306,345 929,161 - - - - 929,161

USES BY PROJECT
Area FM CAP 946,161 929,161 929,161
Solar Big Belly Trash Compactor 428,683 306,345 - TOTAL USES BY PROJECT 1,374,844 306,345 929,161 - - - - 929,161

USES BY ORG CODE
General Capital-20161031 428,683 306,345 - - - - - Marina-40536031 946,161 929,161 929,161
TOTAL USES BY ORG CODE 1,374,844 306,345 929,161 - - - - 929,161 FY2021-22
Adopted
FY2026-27
Proposed
FY2021-22
Actuals
FY2025-26
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed
FY2022-23
Proposed TotalFY2023-24
Proposed
City Manager's Office, Economic Development-36
CIP Overview
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan
58

Page 1874 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Area FM Cap
Craig Murray
Department Responsible: Public Works
Work to implement Cap on Area FM in Marina Bay.

Project ID: 23011
Project Location: 1340 Marina Way S.

Planning and Design: 26,500$
Construction: 667,000$
Equipment: 235,661$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 929,161$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 10/1/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4005 Marina New 929,161$ 929,161$
Total -$ 929,161$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 929,161$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
State of CA DTSC required. Project effort to meet state regulatory guidelines on managing and capping the site. Assists the City in protecting public health and City exposure to State fines.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Meet State Regulator DTSC requirements to clear and cap former WWII shipbuilding contaminated site owned by City of Richmond.
59

Page 1875 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
60

Page 1876 of 2511 ends

Port of Richmond-36

FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Mission
To develop, construct, maintain, and operate the City -owned port facilities to obtain the maximum financial benefit to the City of Richmond; comply with government mandates including health, safety, environmental, and security; improve operational efficiency; and fulfill contractual obligations.

Overview
The Port of Richmond manages five marine terminal facilities that encompass approximately 200 acres.

Each facility reaches various stages of its service life and requires maintenance and/or upgrade.

The main objective of this Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is to establish and implement a long -term investment plan for infrastructure improvements, and development and maintenance of Port facilities.

The Port used the following evaluation criteria for its projects to be included in the CIP:
• Financial Benefit to the City
• Government Mandates
• Health/Safety/Security
• Improve Operational Efficiency
• Environmental Stewardship
• Contractual Obligation

Port of Richmond

Terminal 2 - Dredging

Terminal 3 – Power
Maintenance
61

Page 1877 of 2511 ends

Port of Richmond-36

FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Plan Highlights:

Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) Bert Electrification Install shore power system consistent with the requirements of the California Air Resources Board. This project will install ele ctrical substation, conduits, conductors, and plug-in equipment at the PPMT berth.

Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) General Upgrades
This includes pavement, electrical, water, and various repairs. PPMT requires regular upgrades to infrastructure within the terminal. This updates these systems with modern infrastructure to continue operations.

Project Cost: $750,000
Funding Source: Port
Revenue
Project Cost: $250,000
Funding Source: Port
Revenue
62

Page 1878 of 2511 ends

TOTAL CIP BUDGET - HISTORICAL COMPARISON
FY2021-22
Adopted
FY2021-22
Actual
FY2022-23
Proposed
FY2023-24
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed
FY2025-26
Proposed
FY2026-27
Proposed 5 Year Total
3/31/2022

SOURCES BY FUND
Port Operations CIP Division-4001 844,000 82,374 1,250,000 - - - - 1,250,000 TOTAL SOURCES BY FUND 844,000 82,374 1,250,000 - - - - 1,250,000

USES BY PROJECT
Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) Lighting -
Point Potrero Marine Terminal Berths 7 and 8 Ventrification 83,000 - Point Potrero Marine Terminal Berth Electrification 750,000 750,000 Point Potrero Marine Terminal Electrical System 50,000 35,319 - Point Potrero Marine Terminal Environmental Compliance 100,000 100,000 Point Potrero Marine Terminal General Upgrades 250,000 250,000 PPMT Fence Repairs 87,515 43,515 -
PPMT Rehab 60,000 -
Point Potrero Marine Terminal Graving Basin Water Line 56,397 - Point Potrero Marine Terminal Machine Shop 3,000 - Point Potrero Marine Terminal Riggers Loft Maintenance 150,000 150,000 Terminal 2 - Dredging 275,000 -
Terminal 2 Dock Study/Repair 225,000 -
Terminal 2 - Improvements 4,088 3,540 - TOTAL USES BY PROJECT 844,000 82,374 1,250,000 - - - - 1,250,000

USES BY ORG CODE
Port Operations CIP Division-40183080 844,000 82,374 1,250,000 - - - - 1,250,000 TOTAL USES BY ORG CODE 844,000 82,374 1,250,000 - - - - 1,250,000 Port Operations Department-36
FY2022-23 to FY2025-26 Capital Improvement Plan
63

Page 1879 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Lizeht Zepeda
Department Responsible: Port of Richmond
Project ID: 36003
Project Location: PPMT
Planning and Design: 50,000$
Construction: 700,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other -$
FY2022-23 Total: 750,000$
Estimated Start Date: 9/1/2022
Estimated Completion Date: 1/31/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4001 Port -$ 750,000$ 750,000$
Total $- $750,000 $- $- $- $- $750,000
Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification: he provision of shore power at berth is a requirement of the State of California. The Port has submitted a grant application to help subsidize the cost of these improvements.

Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) Berth Electrification Install shore power system consistent with the requirements of the California Air Resources Board. This project will install electrical substation, conduits, conductors, and plug-in equipment at the PPMT berth.
64

Page 1880 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Lizeht Zepeda
Department Responsible: Port of Richmond
Project ID: 36006
Project Location: PPMT
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 100,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other -$
FY2022-23 Total: 100,000$
Estimated Start Date: 9/1/2022
Estimated Completion Date: 4/30/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4001 Port -$ 100,000$ 100,000$
Total $- $100,000 $- $- $- $- $100,000
Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification: A section of PPMT is subject to the jurisdiction of the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. The Port expects to install a new monitoring well as well as complete an evaluation of the cap's performance.

Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) Environmental
Compliance
Compliance with Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) requirements. This project will complete installation of monitoring wells, field verification, and repairs to the cap as required by the DTSC
65

Page 1881 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Lizeht Zepeda
Department Responsible: Port of Richmond
Project ID: 36004
Project Location: PPMT
Planning and Design: 20,000$
Construction: 230,000$
Equipment:

Contingency/Other -$
FY2022-23 Total: 250,000$
Estimated Start Date: 11/1/2022
Estimated Completion Date: 1/31/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4001 Port -$ 250,000$ 250,000$
Total $- $250,000 $- $- $- $- $250,000
Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification: This project preserves infrastructure that is currently leased to tenants of the Port. Maintaining the infrastructure is a requirement of the Port's lease with its tenants.

Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) General Upgrades
This includes pavement, electrical, water, and various repairs.

PPMT requires regular upgrades to infrastructure within the terminal. This updates these systems with modern
infrastructure to continue operations.
66

Page 1882 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Lizeht Zepeda
Department Responsible: Port of Richmond
Repair roof and paint
Project ID: 36005
Project Location:

Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 150,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other -$
FY2022-23 Total: 150,000$
Estimated Start Date: 9/1/2022
Estimated Completion Date: 10/31/2022
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4001 Port -$ 150,000$ 150,000$
Total $- $150,000 $- $- $- $- $150,000
Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification: The Port invested almost $5 million on rehabiliation of the Riggers Loft Building in 2012. The building requires regular maintenance to ensure it remains functional especially given the marine environment.

Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) Riggers Loft
Maintenance
67

Page 1883 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
68

Page 1884 of 2511 ends

Public Works – Water Resources Recovery Division
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Mission
Protecting Richmond’s public health and environment and transforming stormwater and wastewater into resources.

Overview
The operation and maintenance tasks are provided via a 27 -year contract (expires in May 2027) with Veolia Water North America under the direction of the Director of Water Resource Recovery. The wastewater collection system consists of 183 miles of sewer collection pipelines and 13 sewer lift stations. The wastewater treatment system includes screening, grit removal, primary sedimentation, conventional activated sludge (biological secondary treatment), secondary clarification, disinfection, and de -chlorination, and well as sludge thickening and anaerobic digestion.

Wastewater collection and treatment system Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects are evaluated using the following criteria established by the City and Veolia:
• Projects needed for health and safety
• Projects needed to maintain the quality of effluent flow • Projects driven by regulatory requirements
• Projects that ensure adequate process reliability
• Projects that improve efficiency and effectiveness
• Projects needed to meet requirements in the Baykeeper settlement agreement and Clean Water Act

CO-GEN

SCADA

GRIT/AERATIO
69

Page 1885 of 2511 ends

Public Works – Water Resources Recovery Division
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Plan Highlights
Brick Manhole Rehabilitation
This project is the rehabilitation and sealing of brick manholes in the sanitary sewer collection system in the Richmond Municipal Sewer District. This is an annual program to restore aged brick manholes that contribute significant inflow and infiltration (I/I) into the sewer system during wet weather.

Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Rehabilitation
This project is the replacement or restoration of severely degraded sanitary sewer pipe segments (PACP score of Grade 5) in the Richmond Mun icipal Sewer District. This is an annual program mandated by the Baykeeper Settlement Agreement.

Ferry Point Pump Station Upgrades

This is for the design and construction of the Ferry Point Sanitary Sewer Pump Station located near the end of Dornan Drive. The pump station is in need of upgrades and improvements due to upcoming multi-family homes to be constructed in the area.

Dornan Drive Force Main Sanitary Sewer Upgrades
This project will replace the force main sanitary sewer line that is located on Dornan Drive. It has been associated with four (4) sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) in 2020. This makes this project a high priority due to the environmental and safety impact to the public.

Project Cost: $1,794,130
Total Project Cost over
five fiscal years
Funding Source:

Enterprise Fund
Project Cost:
$13,325,000 Total
Project Cost over five
fiscal years
Funding Source:

Enterprise Fund
Project Cost: $3,816,000
estimated cost over two
years
Funding Source:

Enterprise Fund
Project Cost: $4,000,000
estimated cost over two
years
Funding Source:

Enterprise Fund
70

Page 1886 of 2511 ends

Public Works – Water Resources Recovery Division
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan

Wastewater Treatment Plant Critical Improvements
This project rehabilitates or replaces treatment plant process equipment and structures that have reached the end of their useful life and are a liabili ty from a regulatory and safety standpoint. Project elements include grit and screening, aeration system for the biological secondary treatment process, sludge thickening, dechlorinating, and protecting plant assets and property from rockslides.

Project Cost:
$34,314,184 Total
Project Cost over
multiple fiscal years.

Funding Source Clean
Water State Revolving
Fund Loan, Revenue
Bonds, and Enterprise
Fund
71

Page 1887 of 2511 ends

TOTAL CIP BUDGET - HISTORICAL

COMPARISON
3/31/2022

SOURCES BY FUND
Wastewater - 4003 63,756,081 18,020,186 36,305,185 1,955,870 1,955,870 1,955,870 1,955,870 44,128,665 Wastewater Impact Fee - 2120 1,946,212 794,130 794,130 794,130 794,130 794,130 794,130 3,970,650 TOTAL SOURCES BY FUND 65,702,293 18,814,316 37,099,315 2,750,000 2,750,000 2,750,000 2,750,000 48,099,315

USES BY PROJECT
2017A Bond Cutting Carlson, Hoffman Sewer Capacity 647,041 - 2017A Bond Design Services 714,751 197,976 - Brick Manhole Rehabilitation Project 794,130 38,170 794,130 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,794,130 Design Cutting, Carlson, Hoffman Sewer Capacity 778,080 60,316 - Dornan Drive Force Main 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Ferry Point Dornan Drive Pump Station 3,816,164 175,878 375,000 375,000 First and Bissell Sewer Rehabilitation 365,620 355,185 - First Street Wet Weather 2,719,422 2,471,379 - Fleet Replacement/CCTV Truck 1,570,000 515,000 515,000 Flood Risk Reduction Rheem Creek Watershed 1,598,844 1,598,844 Grit and Aeration Replacement 34,314,184 11,429,037 20,000,000 20,000,000 Macdonald and Virginia Sewer Capacity 593,308 499,937 - Marina Bay Parkway Force Main 511,232 83,633 350,000 350,000 Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Rehabilitation Project 5,442,653 2,044,920 3,325,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 13,325,000 Sanitary Sewer Point Repairs 500,000 16,345 475,000 475,000 Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP)
Cogeneration 2,652,082 174,373 1,461,280 1,461,280 WWTP Dechlorination System Replacement 3,521,283 3,250,000 3,250,000 WWTP Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
(SCADA) Upgrades 899,658 899,658 - WWTP Seismic Retrofit - Phase II 345,479 35,044 325,000 325,000 WWTP Sludge Thickener Replacement 1,517,206 332,465 630,061 630,061 TOTAL USES BY PROJECT 65,702,293 18,814,316 37,099,315 2,750,000 2,750,000 2,750,000 2,750,000 48,099,315 -

USES BY ORG CODE
Wastewater CIP - 40322931 63,756,081 18,020,186 36,305,185 1,955,870 1,955,870 1,955,870 1,955,870 44,128,665 Wastewater Impact Fee - 22022031 1,946,212 794,130 794,130 794,130 794,130 794,130 794,130 3,970,650 TOTAL USES BY ORG CODE 65,702,293 18,814,316 37,099,315 2,750,000 2,750,000 2,750,000 2,750,000 48,099,315 FY2022-23
Proposed 5 Year TotalFY2021-22
Adopted
FY2025-26
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed
FY2023-24
Proposed
FY2021-22
Actual
FY2026-27
Proposed
Water Resource Recovery Department-22
Wastewater CIP Overview
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan
72

Page 1888 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Dornan Drive. Force Main Sewer Rehabilitation
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Publi Works - Water Resources Recovery Project ID: 4003-40322931-400708 01U10
Project Location:

Planning and Design:

Construction: 4,000,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other:

FY2022-23 Total: 4,000,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Justification: Prevent sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs).

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ Total -$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This project is to replace the force main portion of the sanitary sewer located on Dornan Drive. The line is beyond its useful life and needs to be replaced.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:
601 Canal Blvd.
73

Page 1889 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Ferry Point Dornan Drive Pump Station
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery Project ID: 4003-40322931-400708 01U10
Project Location:

Planning and Design:

Construction: 375,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 375,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Justification: Pump station is not adequate to serve the needs of Terminal 1 Development.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater 375,000$ 375,000$
Total -$ 375,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 375,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This project will upgrade the sanitary sewer pump station located at Ferry Point. It will accommodate the additonal housing for the Terminal One Development Project.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:
601 Canal Blvd.
74

Page 1890 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Fleet Replacement - Close Circuit Television Camera Truck Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery Project ID: 4003-40322931-400705 03C04
Project Location:

Planning and Design:

Construction: -$
Equipment: 500,000$
Contingency/Other (accessories): 15,000$
FY2022-23 Total: 515,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Justification: Replacement of aging CCTV Vehicle for Sanitary Collections system operation and maintenance work.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater 515,000$ 515,000$
Total -$ 515,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 515,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Replacement of aging CCTV Vehicle for Sanitary Collections system operation and maintenance workl
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:
601 Canal Blvd.
75

Page 1891 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Flood Risk Reduction Rheem Creek Watershed
Patrick Phelan
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery Project ID: 22A02
Project Location:

Planning and Design:

Construction: 1,598,844$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 1,598,844$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2022
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Justification:

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater 1,598,844$ 1,598,844$ Total -$ 1,598,844$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,598,844$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
New
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:
76

Page 1892 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY20276
Project Description Report
Grit and Aeration Replacement
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery Project ID: 01X10
Project Location:

Engineering During Construction -$
Construction: 20,000,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other:

FY2022-23 Total: 20,000,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Justification: Current system has outlived useful life and needs to be replaced.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater 11,429,037 20,000,000$ 31,429,037$ Total 11,429,037$ 20,000,000$
-$ -$ -$ -$ 31,429,037$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This project will replace the Grit and Aeration system at the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:
601 Canal Blvd.
77

Page 1893 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Manhole Rehabilitation Replacement
Mary Phelps
Department Responsible: Water Resource Recovery - Wastewater Project ID: 22235
Project Location:

Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 794,130$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 794,130$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Justification:

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater Ongoing 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,000,000$ 2120 Wastewater
Impact Fee Ongoing 794,130$ 794,130$ Total -$ 794,130$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,794,130$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
To rehabilitate aged brick manholes that are in danger of collapse and contribute inflow and infiltration (I/I) into the sanitary sewer system. Reduced (I/I) and wet weather sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs).

This project is the rehabilitation and sealing of brick manholes in the sanitary sewer collection system in the Richmond Municipal Sewer District. This is an annual program to restore aged brick manholes that contribute significant inflow and infiltration (I/I) into the sewer system during wet weather.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Richmond Municipal Sewer District
78

Page 1894 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Marina Bay Force Main Relocation
Mary Phelps
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery - Wastewater Project ID:

Project Location:

Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 350,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 350,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Justification: Necessary to prevent sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs).

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater 83,633$ 350,000$ 433,633$ Total 83,633$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 433,633$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This project is necessary in order to prevent sanitary sewer overflows.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:
601 Canal Blvd.
79

Page 1895 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2022 through FY2026
Project Description Report
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Program
Mary Phelps
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery - Wastewater Project ID: 22234
Project Location:

Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 3,325,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 3,325,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Justification:

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater Ongoing 3,325,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 13,325,000$ Total -$ 3,325,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 13,325,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
To replace or restore sewer pipes that are in danger of collapse and contribute inflow and infiltration (I/I) into the sanitary sewer system.

This project is the replacement or restoration of severely degraded sanitary sewer pipe segments (PACP score of Grade 5) in the Richmond Municipal Sewer District. This is an annual program mandated by the Baykeeper Settlement Agreement.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Richmond Municipal Sewer District
80

Page 1896 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2022 through FY2026
Project Description Report
Sanitary Sewer Point Repairs
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery - Wastewater Project ID: 22230
Project Location:

Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 475,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 475,000$
Estimated Start Date:

Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Justification:

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater Ongoing 475,000$ 475,000$ Total -$ 475,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 475,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
To replace or restore sewer pipes that are in danger of collapse and contribute inflow and infiltration (I/I) into the sanitary sewer system.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Richmond Municipal Sewer District
81

Page 1897 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2026
Project Description Report
WWTP Co-Generation
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery - Wastewater Project ID: 4003-40322931-400708 01L10
Project Location:

Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 1,461,280$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other:

FY2022-23 Total: 1,461,280$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Justification: Will enable the plant to reduce energy cosumption.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater 174,373 $ 1,461,280$ 1,635,653$ Total 174,373 $ 1,461,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,635,653$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
The Cogen Project will design and if feasible install a Cogen unit which will beneficially reuse the digester gas to provide power for the Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Cogen unit will enable the WWTP to reduce is energy consumption which will provide environmental benefits and cost savings to the plant's operations.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:
601 Canal Blvd.
82

Page 1898 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
WWTP - Declorination - Sodium Bisulfite Tank (SBS)
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery - Wastewater Project ID: 01N10
Project Location:

Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 3,250,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 3,250,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2020
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Justification: Needed for worker safety and corrosion prevention.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater 3,250,000$ 3,250,000$ Total -$ 3,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,250,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:
601 Canal Blvd.
83

Page 1899 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Seismic Retrofit
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery - Wastewater Project ID: 01S10
Project Location:

Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 325,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 325,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2020
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Justification: Necessary for disaster preparedness
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater 142,201 $ 325,000$ 467,201$ Total 142,201 $ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 467,201$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Study to determine projects required for rehabilitation for earthquake safety.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:
601 Canal Blvd.
84

Page 1900 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Sludge Thickener Replacement Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works - Water Resource Recovery Project ID: 01M10
Project Location:

Planning and Design: -$
Construction: -$
Equipment: 630,061$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 630,061$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Justification: Needed to prevent imminent failure of a critical wastewater treatment process.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 4003 Wastewater 339,104 $ 630,061$ 969,165$ Total 339,104 $ 630,061$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 969,165$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This project replaces the WWTP dissolved air floatation thickener (DAFT) which is operating beyond its useful life. The unit will be replaced with a newer, more efficient rotary drum thickener (RDT) technology.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:
601 Canal Blvd.
85

Page 1901 of 2511 ends

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
86

Page 1902 of 2511 ends

Public Works-23
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan
Mission
To enhance the City’s physical environment, including infrastructure, community facilities and City-owned properties, to the greatest degree possible as efficiently as possible, in order to promote economic vitality and enhance the quality of life of the citizens in Richmond.

Overview
The CIP Department undertakes the planning and design of the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and administers public and public -private par tnership projects that enhance the City’s infrastructure and overall physical environment, consistent with the policies of the General Plan.

As part of its mission, the CIP Department also manages city -owned properties and former Successor Agency properties held by the City for development. The City has over 280 miles of streets, 130 traffic signals, and 9,000 streetlights.

Design Division
A major function of Engineering is the design of public infrastructure which includes streets, bridges, parks, and p ublic buildings. Most projects include a community engagement component where the projects are designed with public participation.

Construction Division
After projects are designed, publicly bid, and constructed by private contractors, Engineering inspectors inspect the projects to ensure quality work is achieved. Staff also inspects new subdivision improvements and encroachment permits within the City’s right- of-way.

Traffic Division
The Traffic Engineering Division handles all citizen service requests, including traffic safety concerns, speed hump requests, signage and striping upgrades, and parking control. The Division is responsible for traffic signal timing and coordination at City-owned traffic signals in addition to the coordination of signal operations at state-owned traffic signals. Traffic Engineering staff also provide traffic counts to prospective business and commercial developers.

37th Street Improvements

SF Bay Trail
87

Page 1903 of 2511 ends

Public Works-23
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan
Land Development Division
This Division reviews the design of all work within the public right -of-way and streets proposed on new residential and commercial developments. Staff ensures that land development plans conform to City standard details, specifications, policies, and practices, as well as zoning and subdivision ordinances.

Pavement Improvements
The City is continuously studying new technology to maximize limited funds and better preserve the existing pavement infrastructure.

Staff is exploring the option of using asphalt rubber as a pavement material. To add to the City’s existing array of pavement preservation applications, staff will be utilizing several different pavement preservation techniques such as more extensive crack sealing, use of fog seals and pavement rejuvenators, and applying thicker, double applications of seal coats.

In this next fiscal year we will continue to rehabilitate pavement. We will also be applying preventative maintenance seal t reatments to various streets in an effort to extend the service life of the pavement. Areas with significant ride-ability issues, such as large failed areas, potholes, and other safety concerns, will be addressed through localized spot rehabilitation. Response to customer complaints and other corrective maintenance requests will continue in order to keep streets in a safe, operable condition.

Pedestrian Access Improvements
The annual sidewalk repair and curb ramp program will continue. This program eliminates tripping hazards created by the root s of City trees uplifting the sidewalk. This program has been implemented to reduce the number of trip and fall claims against the City.

As part of the City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) program, we will be preparing a Transition Plan that will outline the City’s policy of installing curb ramps throughout the City. We will continue to meet the requests for curb ramps as funding permits.

Street Light Improvements
A Citywide project to replace all existing streetlights to energy efficient Light-Emitting Diode (LED) fixtures is complete. During the same period of time, the City has added 1,800 new streetlights to a total of 9,000 streetlights in City streets. Most of the decorative fixtures such as those along Macdonald Avenue in the downtown areas were also converted to LED. The lightings of many freeway underpasses, pathways and the Richmond Greenway were improved, with new LED fixtures installed. Several wire-theft related projects have also been completed, such as Richmond Parkway, Fred Jackson Way and 23 rd street walkway. A number of City Parks have received LED fixtures upgrade, including J.F. Kennedy Park and Nichol Park tennis courts. Staff will continue to upgrade the rest of the City parks as funding allows.

Page 1904 of 2511 ends

Public Works-23
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan
Traffic Safety Improvements
The Traffic Sa fety Program continues to successfully mitigate traffic impacts in neighborhoods by funding the most basic traffic mitigations such as traffic control signs and roadway markings. The Department will continue having an independent speed hum p contract and also looking into the possibility of using traffic circles and bulb outs. This year, we will have an outreach component to the program and solicit from each neighborhood council their number one traffic safety concern. Based on an objective analysis, each concern will be prioritized with an appropriate solution and preliminary cost estimate and programmed into multiple future fi scal years of the CIP program
Plan Highlights
Castro Ranch Road Rehabilitation
The Castro Ranch Road Rehabilitation Project includes infrastructure improvements to Castro Ranch Road from Olinda Road to the City Limit east of County View Drive. The scope of work includes pavement surface rehabilitation along the entire roadway, traffic striping including installation of bicycle lanes from Amend Road to the City Limit east of Country View Drive. Construction of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible curb ramps to ensure accessibility at all intersections, improvement of a pedestrian crossing at Amend Road, installation of a new pedestrian crossing with pedestrian -activated rectangular rapid flashing beacon between Conestoga Way and Deer Run Drive, bus stop improvements, and drainage improvements.

I-80 Central Interchange Phase II
This project is a two phased effort to improve traffic congestion at the I-580/I-80/Central Avenue area.

The second phase will increase the spacing between the signalized interceptions east of I -80 by connecting Pierce Street and San Mateo Street, converting Pierce Street access at Central Avenue to “right -in, right -out” and relocating the traffic signal at Pierce Street/Central Avenue to the San Mateo Street/Central Avenue Interception.

Street Paving
This project is needed to rep air deteriorated infrastructure assets and as preventive maintenance. It will improve the roadway Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and reduce routine maintenance.

Project Cost: $4 Million
over 5 years
Funding Source:

Engineering Grant, SB1
Project Cost: $2,199,012
Funding Source:

Measure J
Project Cost: $2,500,000
Funding Source: Gas Tax
89

Page 1905 of 2511 ends

3/31/2022
Gas Tax-1002 2,847,544 1,535,688 2,815,755 2,554,000 2,605,000 2,657,020 2,710,080 13,341,855 Outside Funded Grants-1006 250,000 16,000 234,000 234,000 Environmental & Community Investment Agreement (ECIA)-1017 3,084,593 409,126 1,313,655 1,313,655 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)-1019 2,736,042 864,894 2,395,337 2,201,606 2,245,638 2,290,551 2,336,362 11,469,493 Engineering Grants-1054 26,218,508 5,660,129 14,509,778 14,509,778 ARPA-1306 2,000,000 35,275 1,820,400 1,820,400 General Capital-2001 2,514,271 193,376 2,214,237 2,214,237 Measure J-2002 5,920,523 1,174,391 3,786,947 4,262,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 11,948,947 Park Impact Fee - 2110 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Traffic Impact Fee-2111 725,498 340,724 263,639 263,639 Open Space Impact Fee-2116 373,264 373,264 373,264 Marina-4005 - - -
TOTAL SOURCES BY FUND 46,685,243 10,244,602 29,742,012 9,017,606 6,150,638 6,247,571 6,346,442 57,504,268 13th Street Complete Street 1,429,801 120,099 793,870 2,962,000 3,755,870 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)/Main Library 500,000 452,000 452,000 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)/Nevin Center 500,000 10,250 450,000 450,000 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)/Recreation Center 500,000 25,025 451,000 451,000 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)/Richmond Museum 500,000 467,400 467,400 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Misc. Sidewalk Repairs 994,774 231,634 330,170 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 2,730,170 ATP Quick Build Cutting/Hoffman 640,990 10,268 625,212 625,212 ATP Quick Build Harbour Way S. Cycle Track 212,671 24,346 184,300 184,300 Boorman Park Revitalization 4,048,752 11,295 3,490,204 3,490,204 Bridge Preventive Maintenance 2,144,323 10,695 2,124,143 2,124,143 Carlson Crosstown Connections and Improvements 421,268 98 398,410 398,410 Castro Ranch Road 1,018,421 290,936 -
Corporation Yard Bathroom Remodel and Fuel Site Upgrades 425,000 399,000 399,000 Fire Station 66 Gender Specific Restroom 98,726 275,052 275,052 Greening the Yellow Brick Road 3,577,922 1,096,207 351,769 351,769 Greenway Gap and Connectivity 273,795 80,813
Greenway Rehab and Bike Education 127,310 127,310 127,310 Harbour 8 Park Expansion 7,416,639 815,339 6,194,260 6,194,260 Harbour Way Improvements 86,402 197 82,500 82,500 Harbour Way & Wright Section 130 1,200,000 925 1,199,075 1,199,075 Hilltop Fire Station Fuel System 50,000 50,000 50,000 I-80 Central Interchange Phase II 2,351,039 125,865 2,199,012 2,199,012 JPA Sportsfield Agreement 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Local Roadway Safety Plan 52,568 46,705 - Martin Luther King Jr. Center 267,692 267,692 267,692 FY2025-26
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed
FY2023-24
Proposed

TOTAL CIP BUDGET - HISTORICAL COMPARISON
FY2021-22
Actuals 5 Year TotalFY2021-22
Adopted
FY2022-23
Proposed

USES BY PROJECT

SOURCES BY FUND
FY2026-27
Proposed
Public Works Department-23
CIP Overview
90

Page 1906 of 2511 ends

3/31/2022
FY2025-26
Proposed
FY2024-25
Proposed
FY2023-24
Proposed

TOTAL CIP BUDGET - HISTORICAL COMPARISON
FY2021-22
Actuals 5 Year TotalFY2021-22
Adopted
FY2022-23
Proposed
FY2026-27
Proposed
Public Works Department-23
CIP Overview
Continued -
Martin Luther King Jr. Park Turf Field Replacement 250,000 16,000 234,000 234,000 Membership & Dues (West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee and Contra Costa Transportation Authority) 140,000 140,000 200,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 760,000 Native American Health Center 50,000 50,000 50,000 Old Building Demo - 824 Macdonald Ave 125,000 97,200 - Parks Yard Fuel Site Upgrades 220,000 220,000 220,000 Richmond Museum Roof 175,000 -
Richmond Plunge Replace Boiler 100,000 58,163 - S. Richmond Transit Connectivity Improvement 65,000 65,000 65,000 SF Bay Trail Goodrick Avenue 28,756 394 - SF Bay Trail Pt. Molate 1,036,317 10,103 1,019,967 1,019,967 Shimada Park Restroom 275,000 27,910 240,790 240,790 Street Audit Report 4,000 3,200 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 20,000 Street Paving 2,567,894 1,532,488 2,500,000 2,550,000 2,601,000 2,653,020 2,706,080 13,010,100 Street Paving - SB1 37th Street 300,000 1,978 300,000 300,000 Street Paving - SB1 Castro Ranch Road 977,585 425,980 329,168 329,168 Street Paving - SB1 Richmond Parkway 15,800 10,361 1,000,000 1,000,000 Street Paving - SB1 Cutting/Harbour Way S. Bikeway 900,000 103,291 706,308 2,201,606 2,245,638 2,290,551 2,336,362 9,780,464 Street Paving - SB1 Marina Way - Wellness Trail 542,657 323,284 59,861 59,861 Surface Drainage 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000 Traffic Safety Improvements 1,397,748 896,926 263,639 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 1,303,639 Yellow Brick Road 7,661,593 3,681,627 1,321,900 1,321,900 TOTAL USES BY PROJECT 46,685,243 10,244,602 29,742,012 9,017,606 6,150,638 6,247,571 6,346,442 57,504,268 Gas Tax-10234431 2,847,544 1,535,688 2,815,755 2,554,000 2,605,000 2,657,020 2,710,080 13,341,855 Outside Funded Grants-10633031 250,000 16,000 234,000 - - - - 234,000 ECIA-11731013 3,084,593 409,126 1,313,655 - - - - 1,313,655 RMRA-11931031 2,736,042 864,894 2,395,337 2,201,606 2,245,638 2,290,551 2,336,362 11,469,493 Engineering Grants-15436431 26,218,508 5,660,129 14,509,778 - - - - 14,509,778 ARPA 2,000,000 35,275 1,820,400 - - - - 1,820,400 General Capital-20136031 2,514,271 193,376 2,214,237 - - - - 2,214,237 Measure J-20236031 5,920,523 1,174,391 3,786,947 4,262,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 11,948,947 15,000 15,000 15,000 - - - - 15,000 Traffic Impact Fee-21136031 725,498 340,724 263,639 - - - - 263,639 Open Space Impact Fee-21633131 373,264 - 373,264 - - - - 373,264 Marina-40536031
TOTAL USES BY ORG CODE 46,685,243 10,244,602 29,742,012 9,017,606 6,150,638 6,247,571 6,346,442 57,504,268 Park Impact Fee-21033131

USES BY ORG CODE
FY2022-23 to FY2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan
91

Page 1907 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2022 through FY2026
Project Description Report
13th Street Complete Street
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 29120
Project Location: 13th St. from Harbour Way to Costa Ave.

Engineering Cost Charges for Services: -$
Planning and Design: 793,870$
Construction: -$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 793,870$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2019
Estimated Completion Date: TBD
$793,870
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2002 Measure J 202,795 $ 793,870$ 2,962,000$ 3,958,665$ Total 202,795 $ 793,870$ 2,962,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,958,665$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$

SOURCE OF FUNDING
The 13th Street corridor is a key connection to Harbour Way South in Richmond via the Pennsylvania Overcrossing, as well as to Rumrill Boulevard in neighboring San Pablo, connecting Central Richmond to Contra Costa College and the Hilltop Mall area. This project will significantly improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and will connect to existing and proposed facilities in Richmond and in San Pablo.

Install complete streets elements: improve lighting to increase safety and walkability after dark; reduce traffic speeds; improve sidewalks and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) curb ramps; install better street crossings; plant shade trees and other landscaping; install bicycle facilities to expand network; separate sidewalk from street; provide better access to bus stops; install bus shelters with benches and trash receptacles.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Total Estimated Cost:
92

Page 1908 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Miscellaneous Sidewalk Repairs Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 01A04
Project Location: City-wide
Engineering Cost Charges for Services: -$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 330,170$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 330,170$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2015
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
$330,170
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2002 Measure J Ongoing 330,170$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 2,730,170$ Total -$ 330,170$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 2,730,170$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$

SOURCE OF FUNDING
The 1990 ADA requires public agencies to identify, plan, and modify barriers of access to the disabled. A regular curb ramp upgrade program is required to ensure public safety and reduce liability exposure.

This annual program is dedicated to complying with (ADA) within the street right-of-way through: Curb Ramp Upgrades - by upgrading or installing reported curb ramp deficiencies. Damaged Sidewalks - repair sidewalk, curb, gutter, and adjacent pavement damaged by the roots of City owned trees. Sidewalk Gaps - install missing sidewalk and associated curb, gutter or driveways, and adjacent pavement to eliminate pedestrian access barriers.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Total Estimated Cost:
93

Page 1909 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
ATP Quick Build Cutting/Hoffman Cycle Track
Patrick Phelan
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project Location:

Charges for Services 6,000$
Planning and Design: 10,000$
Construction: 609,212$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 625,212$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: TBD
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1054 Engineering Grant New 625,212$ 625,212$ Total -$ 625,212$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 625,212$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

This project includes installing a separated two-way bikeway along portions of Cutting Boulevard, Hoffman Boulevard, and Harbour Way South, as well as an asphalt berm, traffic striping, pavement markings, signage, asphalt slurry sealing, and traffic signal work.
94

Page 1910 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Patrick Phelan
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 23G07
Project Location:

Charges for Services 6,000$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 178,300$
Construction Management:

Contingency/Other:

FY2022-23 Total: 184,300$
Estimated Start Date: 9/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1054 Engineering Grants New 184,300$ 184,300$ Total -$ 184,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 184,300$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Implementing the recently adopted Ferry to Bridge to Greenway (F2B2G) Plan.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

ATP Quick Harbour Way Southand Cutting Bikeways
Cutting Boulevard (Garrard-Hoffman),
Hoffman Boulevard (Cutting-Harbour Way
South), Harbour Way South (Hoffman-
South Terminus)
95

Page 1911 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2022 through FY2026
Project Description Report
Boorman Park Revitalization
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 23006
Project Location: 27th Street and Maine Avenue
Charges for Services
Planning and Design: 500,000$
Construction: 2,990,204$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2021-22 Total: 3,490,204$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2020
Estimated Completion Date: 06/30/2023
This park received a $4,165,000 State Grant for a total park rehabilitation.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1054 Egineering Grant $ 112,719 3,490,204$ 3,602,923$ Total 112,719$ 3,490,204$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,602,923$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: 250,000$
Total revitalization of Boorman Park.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
96

Page 1912 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Bridge Preventive Maintenance
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 23G02
Project Location: Various
Charges for Services 7,408$
Planning and Design: 21,000$
Construction: 2,095,735$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 2,124,143$
Estimated Start Date: 3/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 12/31/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1002 Gas Tax $ - 248,340$ 248,340$ 1054 Engineering Grant $ 8,689 1,875,803$ 1,884,492$ Total 8,689$ 2,124,143$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,132,832$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Clean bridge deck and treat with Methacrylate: Giant Highway Connector Undercrossing (Bridge No. 28C0472) and Richmond Parkway Viaduct (Bridge Nos. 28C0474L and 28C0474R).

Joint seal repairs on Bridge No. 28C0474L. Replace bent anchor bolts and joint seal at abutment 1 of 13th Street Overcrossing (Bridge No. 28C0317).

A RESO to accept and appropriate federal grant funds is on the 10/20/2020 Council Agenda; with a $5,735 design phase local match in the current fiscal year, and then a $248,340 construction phase local match in FY2021-22. 97

Page 1913 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID's: 29122 and 29114
Project Location:

Charges for Services -$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 398,410$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 398,410$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2019
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1054 Engineering Grant 279,805 $ 398,410$ 678,215$ Total 279,805 $ 398,410$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 678,215$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Carlson Boulevard is designated as a Key Corridor in both the Pedestrian Plan and the Bicycle Master Plan (BMP). The BMP also recommends a road diet to improve pedestrian safety.

This project includes the design and construction of bicycle lanes along Carlson Boulevard to provide a continuous bikeway from the existing bike lanes on Carlson Boulevard at San Pablo Avenue in El Cerrito north to Broadway, near Richmond Civic Center. Additionally the project includes state-of-the-art bus shelters at select locations prepped for Wi-Fi and real-time transit information. This project's conceptual design and environmental review were completed concurrently with the Bicycle Master Plan. The Project is partially funded by a Safe Routes to Transit grant awarded by the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Carlson Blvd. Crosstown Connections and Improvements
Project
Carlson Blvd Corridor from Broadway to
Tehama
98

Page 1914 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Fire Station 66 - Gender Specific Restrooms
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 05G01
Project Location: 4100 Clinton Avenue
Planning and Design: 1,500$
Construction: 273,552$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 275,052$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2019
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
A gender specific restroom facility is needed to accommodate female firefighter needs.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2001 General Capital 66,000$ 275,052$ 341,052$ Total 66,000$ 275,052$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 341,052$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Construct a gender specific restroom facility.
99

Page 1915 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Greening the Yellow Brick Road
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Creating of safe bicycle and pedestrian routes.

Project ID: 29125
Project Location:

Charges for Services -$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 351,769$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 351,769$
Estimated Start Date: 4/1/2019
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
To create safe bicycle and pedestrian routes, and to add greening elements in the Iron Triangle Neighborhood.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1054 Engineering Grant 1,618,383$ 351,769$ 1,970,152$ Total 1,618,383$ 351,769$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,970,152$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: 400,000$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Pennsylvania from 7th Street to 9th
Street, 8th Street from Barrett Avenue
to Pennsylvania Avenue.

Bicycle and pedestrian safety elements including bicycle lanes, curb ramps, elevated crosswalks, bulb-outs, flashing beacons, pavement striping, traffic circles, signage, lighting. 100

Page 1916 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Greenway Rehab and Bike Education
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 23023
Project Location:

Charges for Services -$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 127,310$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 127,310$
Estimated Start Date: 9/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2024
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1002 Gas Tax New 27,310$ 27,310$
1054 Engineering Grant New 100,000$ 100,000$ Total -$ 127,310$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 127,310$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: 400,000$
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Richmond Greenway
Two segments of the Richmond Greenway multi-use path are in need of rehabilitation between 20th and 23rd Streets along Dirt World, the 2-acre, free, public bicycle terrain park. The multi-use path is deteriorating and grant funds would be used to add a 2 inch asphalt overlay and refresh pavement
markings. At the 23rd Street side, a 5 foot wide sidewalk Three-part project including bicycle safety education with Bike East Bay, maintenance of the Richmond Greenway in collaboration with Safe Organized Spaces Richmond (SOS! Richmond 101

Page 1917 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2022 through FY2026
Project Description Report
Harbour 8 Park Expansion
Jene Levine-Snipes
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 23004
Project Location: #1 Harbour Way South
Charges for Services 45,000$
Planning and Design: 79,630$
Construction: 6,069,630$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 6,194,260$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2020
Estimated Completion Date: 06/30/2024
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1054 Engineering Grant $ 1,904,077 6,194,260$ 8,098,337$ Total 1,904,077$ 6,194,260$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,098,337$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost:

This park received a $8,500,000 State Grant for a total park rehabilitation. The Project will improve the quality of life and safety for the neighborhood.

Property acquisition and Park Expansion Project
Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
102

Page 1918 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Harbour Way & Wright Section 130
Patrick Phelan
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 22022
Project Location: Harbour Way Blvd.

Charges for Services -$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 1,199,075$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 1,199,075$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2021
Estimated Completion Date: TBD
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1054 Engineering Grant New 1,199,075$ 1,199,075$ Total -$ 1,199,075$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,199,075$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Caltrans will fund and coordinate two construction projects, one performed by the railroad (BNSF) and one by the Local Agency (City of Richmond). Due to the abundance of underground utilities in the vicinity, it is not possible to install crossing arms and other typical rail crossing safety measures. Instead, a new traffic signal will provide the needed safety improvements and traffic control. Other project elements include but are not limited to: bicycle specific traffic signals, pedestrian signals and pushbuttons, “NO RIGHT TURN ON RED” active blank out signs, raised concrete medians, pedestrian curb ramps, detectable warning tiles, curb and gutter on the south edge of Wright Ave, limited repaving, and striping and signage.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
103

Page 1919 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Harbour Way Improvements
Patrick Phelan
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 29103
Project Location: Harbour Way Blvd. (North and South)
Charges for Services -$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 82,500$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 82,500$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2016
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1054 Engineering Grant Ongoing 82,500$ 82,500$ 2002 Measure J Ongoing -$
Total -$ 82,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 82,500$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Harbour Way is in both the Pedestrian Plan and the Bicycle Master Plan. It is especially important as a bike/pedestrian route because it is the only street that traverses the City in a north-south direction connecting San Pablo and North Richmond to the planned ferry service at the terminus of Harbour Way.

This project entails the design and construction of a variety of pedestrian and bicycle improvements along Harbour Way from its southerly terminus at the proposed Richmond Ferry Terminal north to Pennsylvania Avenue. The project will implement improvements proposed in several City planning documents, including the South Shoreline Connectivity Plan, Bicycle Master Plan, and the Pedestrian Plan and its Yellow Brick Road appendix. The Project is partially funded by a Transportation Development Act grant.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
104

Page 1920 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
I-80 Central Interchange Phase I
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 29110
Project Location: I-580/I-80 Central Ave.

Charges for Services -$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 2,199,012$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 2,199,012$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2016
Estimated Completion Date: 12/31/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2002 Measure J 1,001,798$ 2,199,012$ 3,200,810$ Total 1,001,798$ 2,199,012$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,200,810$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: 400,000$
Central Avenue is a designated Route of Regional Significance in Contra Costa County. The four closely spaced signalized intersections along Central Avenue between Jacuzzi Street and Pierce Street lack sufficient storage capacity, resulting in poor intersection operations and heavy congestion during peak travel times, especially on weekends.

This project is the second of a two phase effort to improve traffic congestion at the I-580/I-80/Central Avenue area. Phase I includes signalization of intersections currently configured as all-way stops and the installation of variable message signs (VMS). The VMS will be configured to prohibit left turns onto westbound I-80 from Central during weekend peak periods, redirecting this traffic to eastbound I-580. This project is wholly funded by grants, including a Federal earmark and Measure J.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
105

Page 1921 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) Sports Field Partnership
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 03A01
Project Location: 400 Gilman Street, Albany, CA
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: -$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: 15,000$
FY2022-23 Total: 15,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2015
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2110 Park Impact Fee Ongoing 15,000$ 15,000$ Total -$ 15,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$

SOURCE OF FUNDING
This is an agreement that has been entered into with the other agencies.

This is an agreement the City of Richmond entered into with the cities of El Cerrito, Albany, Berkeley, and Emeryville to build and maintain a multi-use sports field.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
106

Page 1922 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Martin Luther King Jr. Community Center
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 01015
Project Location: 360 Harbour Way S.

Charges for Services: -$
Planning and Design: 267,692$
Construction: -$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 267,692$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2015
Estimated Completion Date: TBD
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2001 General Capital 531,097 $ 267,692$ 798,789$ Total 531,097 $ 267,692$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 798,789$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Design and construct a new (replacement) MLK Community Center.

This project will design and construct a new community
center to replace the Martin Luther King (MLK) Jr.

Community Center that was damaged by flooding, and
demolished in 2010. The new MLK Center will be designed through a community process and made an integral part of the Nystrom Village Revitalization project. Final design and construction cost are currently unfunded.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
107

Page 1923 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
SF Bay Trail Pt. Molate
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 01A14
Project Location: Pt. Molate
Charges for Services: 115,139$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 904,828$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 1,019,967$
Estimated Start Date: 6/30/2016
Estimated Completion Date:

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2001 General Capital 526,150$ 646,703$ 1,172,853$ 2116 Parks Open Space Impact Fee 373,264$ 373,264$ Total 526,150$ 1,019,967$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,546,117$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost:

Pedestrian and bicycle safety. Recreation.

This project will construct 1.25 miles of multi-use San Francisco Bay Trail between Point Molate Beach Park and Stenmark Drive at the northern border of the City’s Point Molate property.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
108

Page 1924 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Street Paving
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 01A05
Project Location: City-wide
Charges for Services 850,000$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 1,650,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: Annual Street Audit Report -$
FY2022-23 Total: 2,500,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2016
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1002 Gas Tax Ongoing 2,500,000$ 2,550,000$ 2,601,000$ 2,653,020$ 2,706,080$ 13,010,100$ Total -$ 2,500,000$ 2,550,000$ 2,601,000$ 2,653,020$ 2,706,080$ 13,010,100$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This project is needed to repair deteriorated infrastructure assets and as preventive maintenance. It will improve the roadway Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and reduce routine maintenance.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

This project is needed to repair deteriorated infrastructure assets and as preventive maintenance. It will improve the roadway Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and reduce routine maintenance. The pavement rehabilitation is anticipated to have a useful life of 20 years and is anticipated to be completed during fiscal years 2020-21and 2021-22.
109

Page 1925 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Patrick Phelan
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: SB115
Project Location:

Charges for Services 809$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 543,320$
Construction Management: -$
Contingency/Other: 162,179$
FY2022-23 Total: 706,308$
Estimated Start Date: 9/1/2020
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2024
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1019 SB1 103,291 $ 706,308$ 809,599$
Total 103,291 $ 706,308$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 809,599$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Implementing the recently adopted Ferry to Bridge to Greenway (F2B2G) Plan.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

Street Paving Cutting Boulevard and Harbour Way South
Bikeways
Cutting Boulevard (Garrard-Hoffman),
Hoffman Boulevard (Cutting-Harbour Way
South), Harbour Way South (Hoffman-
South Terminus)
110

Page 1926 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Street Paving 37th Street Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: SB101
Project Location: 37th Street
Charges for Services 22,310$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 277,690$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: Annual Street Audit Report -$
FY2022-23 Total: 300,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1019 SB1 Ongoing 300,000$ 300,000$ Total -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This grant-funded project is needed to address traffic safety for vehicles, pedestrians, and people riding bicycles.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

ADA curb ramp construction, pedestrian bulb-outs, traffic striping and pavement markings, traffic signal pedestrian improvements, pavement rehabilitation.
111

Page 1927 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Street Paving SB1 - Castro Ranch Road Rehabilitation
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: SB102 and 23G03
Project Location: Castro Ranch Road
Charges for Services 9,070$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 320,098$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: Annual Street Audit Report -$
FY2022-23 Total: 329,168$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2024
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1019 SB1 539,670$ 329,168$ 868,838$ 1054 Grant 290,936$ 290,936$
Total 830,607$ 329,168$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,159,775$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This project is needed to repair deteriorated infrastructure assets. It will improve the roadway Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and reduce routine maintenance.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

The pavement rehabilitation is anticipated to have a useful life of 20 years and is anticipated to be completed during fiscal year 2021-22.

ADA improvements, pavement rehabilitation, bicycle striping, pavement markings, traffic striping, pedestrian crossings.
112

Page 1928 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Street Paving SB1 Marina Way Wellness Trail
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: SB106
Project Location:

Charges for Services -$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 59,861$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: Annual Street Audit Report -$
FY2021-22 Total: 59,861$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1019 SB1 323,284 59,861$ 383,145$ Total -$ 59,861$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 383,145$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This project is needed to repair deteriorated infrastructure assets and as preventive maintenance. It will improve the roadway Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and reduce routine maintenance.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

The pavement rehabilitation is anticipated to have a useful life of 20 years.

Funded with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues include, pavement rehabilitation of portions of the Richmond Parkway.
113

Page 1929 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Street Paving SB1 Richmond Parkway
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: SB106
Project Location:

Charges for Services -$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 1,000,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: Annual Street Audit Report -$
FY2020222 Total: 1,000,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1019 SB1 323,284 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ Total -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This project is needed to repair deteriorated infrastructure assets and as preventive maintenance. It will improve the roadway Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and reduce routine maintenance.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:

The pavement rehabilitation is anticipated to have a useful life of 20 years.

Funded with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues include, pavement rehabilitation of portions of the Richmond Parkway.
114

Page 1930 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Surface Drainage
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 01C09
Project Location: City-wide
Charges for Services 27,000$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 273,000$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 300,000$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
This project is mandated by Federal Law.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2002 Measure J Ongoing 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,500,000$ Total -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,500,000$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
This project is intended to address various types of surface drainage issues including but not limited to the following: Repair damaged curb and gutter causing ponding; reduce isolated flooding areas; and stop ground water seepage.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
115

Page 1931 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Traffic Safety Improvement
Joe Leach
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 01B02
Project Location: City-wide
Charges for Services 57,419$
Planning and Design: -$
Construction: 206,220$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2022-23 Total: 263,639$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2018
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
The project is needed to improve traffic safety at several locations throughout the City.

Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 2002 Measure J Ongoing -$ 260,000$ 260,000$ 260,000$ 260,000$ 1,040,000$ 2111 Traffic Impact Fee Ongoing 263,639$ 263,639$ Total -$ 263,639$ 260,000$ 260,000$ 260,000$ 260,000$ 1,303,639$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: -$
Various traffic safety improvement projects including Video Detection Systems and traffic signal improvements. 33rd and Macdonald, traffic calming measures, Harbour Way striping improvements, on-call transportation consultant, studies, etc Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
116

Page 1932 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Capital Improvement Plan
FY2023 through FY2027
Project Description Report
Yellow Brick Road
Yader Bermudez
Department Responsible: Public Works
Project ID: 29113
Project Location: 8th Street
Charges for Services 8,245$
Planning and Design: 58,397$
Construction: 1,255,258$
Equipment: -$
Contingency/Other: -$
FY2021-22 Total: 1,321,900$
Estimated Start Date: 7/1/2017
Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Project Funding Prior FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total 1054 Engineering Grant 883,917$ 8,245$ 892,162$ 1017 ECIA 618,098$ 1,313,655$ 1,931,753$ Total 1,502,015$ 1,321,900$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,823,915$ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: 400,000$
Construct a safe bike and walking route in Richmond's Iron Triangle neighborhood to connect community assets together.

Construct a safe bike and walking route in Richmond's Iron Triangle neighborhood to connect community assets together.

Project Name:

Project Manager:

Project Description:

Justification:
117

Page 1933 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

The glossary includes terms that will help you understand the technical language often used in a capital improvements program .

Glossary terms are listed alphabetically under each alphabet letter, and include a brief description and an acronym, as applicable.

Accounting System: The total set of records and procedures which are used to record, classify, and report information on the financial status and operations of an entity.

Accounts Payable (A/P): Amounts owing to private persons, firms, or corporation for goods and services received.

Accounts Receivable (A/R): Amounts owing from private persons, firms or corporation for goods and services furnished.

Accrual Basis: The basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and measurable regardless of when collected; and expenses are recorded on a matching basis when incurred. All proprietary and fiduciary funds use the accrual basis of accounting.

Accrue: To record revenues and expenditures (expenses) when they meet the recognition criteria of the fund type involved regardless of when the cash activity occurs.

Accrued Expenditures (Expenses): Expenses or expenditures that meet the appropriate recognition criteria of the fund type involved but have not been paid. Accrued expenditures are expected to be paid in a subsequent accounting period.

Accrued Revenues: Revenues that meet the appropriate recognition criteria of the fund type invoiced, but are not realized during the accounting period. Refer to accrual basis, accrual and modified accrual basis.

Actual: Actual refers to the expenditures and/or revenues realized in the past.

Adjusted Budget: The status of appropriations as of a specific date between July 1 st, at the beginning of the fiscal period, and June
30th, at the end of the fiscal period. Includes the adopted budget, budget amendments, prior year encumbrances, approved project carry forwards from prior years, and transfers between accounts, divisions and departments.

Adopted Budget: Revenues and appropriations approved by the City Council immediately preceding the new fiscal period effective July 1st.

Page 1934 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Agency/Department: A major unit of the municipal organization which is managed by an Agency/Department Director and comprised of a number of divisions which are functionally related to one another.

Allocation: The practice of spreading costs among various cost centers on some predetermined reasonable basis (e.g., percentages based on allocation plan) as opposed to distribution of expenses on a unit charge or direct identification basis.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) : Legislation passed in 1990 that prohibits discri mination against people with disabilities.

Under this Act, discrimination against a disabled person is illegal in employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications and government activities. The law prohibits private employers, state and local governments, employment agencies and labor unions from discriminating against the disabled. Employers are required to make reasonable accommodations in order for the disabled person to perform their job function.

Annexation: A change in existing community boundaries resulting from the incorporation of additional land.

Appraisal: The process through which conclusions of property value are obtained; also refers to the report that sets forth the process of estimation and conclusion of value.

Appropriated Expenditure: In the Fiscal Year Budget, an amount set aside for a specific acquisition or purpose.

Appropriation: Is the legal authority authorized by the City Council to expend up to a certain amount of funds during a budget period. For the City, the adopted budget is the source of appropriations.

Appropriation limit: Imposed by Propositions 4 and 111, creates a restriction on the amount of revenue which can be appropriated in any fiscal year. The limit is based on actual appropriations, and is increased each year using the growth of population and inflation. Not all revenue are restricted by the limit; only those which are referred to as "proceeds of taxes."

Appropriation Resolution: The official enactment by the City Council to establish legal authority for City officials to obligate and expend funds.

Assessed Valuation (AV): The valuation set upon real estate and certain personal property by the County Assessor as a basis for levying property taxes.

Assets: The entries on a balance sheet showing all properties and claims against others that may be used directly or indirectly to cover liabilities.

Page 1935 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Audit: Prepared by an independent Certified Public Accountant (CPA), the primary objective of an audit is to determi ne if the City's financial statements present fairly the City's financial position and results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In conjunction with their performance of an audit, it is customary for an independent auditor to issue a Management Letter stating the adequacy of the City's internal controls as well as recommending improvements to the City's financial management practices.

Balanced Budget: A budget in which current revenues in combination with current fund balances equal or exceed current expenditures.

Balance Sheet: A statement purporting to present the financial position of an entity by disclosing its assets, liabilities, and fund equities as of a specific date.

Baseline Schedule: This is the first schedule the project team gains from the Pre- Design Phase of the project based on knowledge about project context and requirements as well as historical data from previous projects. It is a f ixed project schedule used in measuring project progress and contract performance. Any change caused by change in scope of the project invalidates the original schedule and necessitates a new baseline schedule.

Base Line Budget: Previous year adopted budget with adjustments or current salaries, benefits, indirect, internal service rates.

Bidder: An individual, partnership, firm, corporation, or joint venture, submitting a bid for a construction project.

Bid Items: Specific items of work, either materials, finished products, or bodies of work that a bidder bids a price on in their pursuit of a construction project; bid items are those items in a construction contract that will be paid for directly.

Bid Package: The package of materials that is given out to prospective bidders for their use in bidding on a construction project; the package includes a copy of the Invitation to Bid; various notices, forms and contract provisions, Proposal, Special Provisions, wage rates, Plan Set, permits/approvals, addenda, and subsurface boring logs (if any).

Biennial Budget: A biennial budget is one that lasts for two years, so any funding initiated by this budget is covered for a two-year period.

Page 1936 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Bond (Debt Instrument): A written promise to pay (debt) a specified sum of money (called principal or face value) at a specified future date (called the maturity date) along with periodic interest paid at a specified percentage of the principal (interest rate). Bonds are typically used for long-term debt to pay for specific capital expenditures.

Budget: A financial plan for a specific period of time (fiscal period) that matches all planned revenues and expenditures with various municipal services.

Budget Adjustment: A legal procedure utilized by City staff to revise a budget appropriation. City staff has the prerogative to adjust expenditures within departmental budgets. City Council approval is required for transfers between funds, and for additional appropriations from fund balance or new revenue sources.

Budget Calendar: The schedule of key dates or milestones that the City follows in the preparation, adoption and administration of the budget.

Budget Document: A financial and planning tool that reflects the proposed (and later adopted) revenues and appropriations for the City (including operating and capital), performance standards, targets, organizational structure and goals, along with histor ical financial information.

Budget Year: The fiscal year for which a budget is being considered.

Budgetary Amendments: The City Council has the sole responsibility for adopting the City's budget, and may amend or supplement the budget at any time after adoption by majority vote. The City Manager has the authority to approve administrativ e adjustments to the budget as long as those changes are between objects within the same expenditure category.

Budgetary Basis: The process by which budgeted expenditures are adopted through the passage of a resolution. This resolution constitutes the maximum authorized expenditures for the fiscal year and cannot legally be exceeded except by subsequent amendments of the budget by the City Council.

Budgetary Control: The control or management of a governmental unit or enterprise in accordance with an approved budget for the purpose of keeping expenditures within the limitations of available resources.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans): State agency that builds and maintains state highways and administers transportation programs within the state.

Page 1937 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): Is a statute that requires all jurisdictions in the State of California to evaluate the extent of environmental degradation posed by proposed development or project.

A 1970 law which requires those state agencies to regulate planning and development activity, with major consideration for environmental protection. The basic purposes of CEQA are to:
• Inform governmental decision- makers and the public about the potential significant environmental effects of a proposed planning or development activity;
• Identify ways environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced (mitigation); • Prevent significant, avoidable environmental damage by requiring changes in projects through the use of alternative measures when those measures are feasible; and
• (Overriding consideration) Disclose to the public the reasons why a governmental agency approved a project in the manner the agency chose if significant environmental effects are involved.

California Public Utility Commission (CPUC): Regulates privately owned telecommunications, electric, natural gas, water, railroad, rail transit, and passenger transportation companies. The CPUC is responsible for assuring California utility customers have safe, reliable utility service at reasonable rates, protecting utility customers from fraud, and promoting the health of California's economy.

California Transportation Commission (CTC): Is a body established by Assembly Bill 402 (AB 402) and appointed by the Governor to advise and assist the Sec retary of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency and the Legislature in formulating and evaluating state policies and plans for transportation.

Capacity Enhancements: Are new facilities projects and operational improvements, which add through lanes.

Capital Assets: Assets of significant value and having a useful life of more than one year. Capital assets are also called fixed assets.

Capital Budget: A plan of proposed capital expenditures and the means of financing them. The capital budget is enacted as part of the City's consolidated budget which includes both operating and capital outlays, and is based on a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).

Capital Expenditure: An outlay that results in or contributes to the acquisition or construction of a capital asset.

Page 1938 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Capital Improvement Plan (CIP): Is a long- range plan of proposed Capital Improvement Projects with single and multiple- year capital expenditures. The CIP is updated annually. Appropriations for each approved project are presented in the annual budget, with some projects spanning multiple fiscal years.

Capital Improvement Program or Capital Projects: A plan for capital expenditures for the acquisition, expansion or rehabilitation of an element of the City’s physical plant to be incurred within a fixed period of several future years.

Capital Improvements: Are permanent additions to the City's assets, including the design, construction or purchase of land, buildings or facilities or major renovations of the same. They can be new improvements or existing infrastructure whose oper ation has been extended or enhanced as result of the project.

Capital Outlay: Expenditures relating to the purchase of equipment, facility modifications, land, and other fixed assets.

Capital Project Fund: Used to account for financial resources used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by Proprietary Funds).

Capital Reinvestment Fund: General Fund monies expended on capital projects.

Carry forward: Appropriations brought forward from a previous fiscal year to continue or com plete a specific project, program or activity.

Cash Basis: A basis of accounting in which transactions are recognized only when cash is increased or decreased.

Categorical Exclusion: A category of project actions which a federal agency identifies in its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the environment.

Central Business District (CBD): Is the downtown core area of a city, generally an area of high land valuation, traf fic flow, and concentration of retail, business offices, theaters, hotels, and service businesses.

Change Order: A written account of changes in quantities or work during the Construction Phase. Change orders must be approved at the appropriate level of authority as defined in the Change Order Management policy.

Circulation Mitigation: Developer impact fees for traffic and street improvements.

Clean Water Act: Legislation that provides statutory authority for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program; Public law 92-500; 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. Also known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.

Page 1939 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Close Out: The managerial process of finalizing the project. During this process, all physical work is completed, project records are filed, required closure notifications are distributed, and necessary or requested audits are conducted.

Commitment: Planned expenditures from the general ledger details are rolled- up in a commitment line item. City Council approved budget is based on a commitment item

Community Advisory Group (CAG): A Community Advisory Group is a committee, task force, or board made up of residents of a community with Superfund or other environmental problems. The Community Advisory Group enhances public participation in the cleanup process and other environmental decision-making by providing a public forum where community representatives can discuss their diverse interests, needs, and concerns.

Community Development Agency: Is responsible for maintaining the City's infrastructure system, utilities and community facilities, as well as providing the necessary improvements in order to accommodate long-term growth.

Community Facility District (CFD): Special taxes levied on property owners for capital improvements in their community.

Community Involvement Plan: A plan developed with support from Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Community Relations staff, Communications staff and Public Affairs staff that forms the basis of project-related external communications with the public.

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) : Official annual report of a government. In addition to a combined, combining (assembling of data for all funds within a type), and individual balance sheet, the following are also presented as appropriate: (1) statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance (all funds); (2) statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance, budget and actual (for general and special revenue funds); (3) statement of revenues, expenses, and changes in retained earnings (for proprietary funds); and (4) statement of changes in financial position (for proprietary funds).

Concept: Is a strategy for future improvements that will reduce congestion or maintain the existing level of service on a specific route.

Concurrency: A requirement that development and the extension of infrastructure occurs at the same time. This is used to prevent sprawling development in areas that do not have infrastructure in place, and to ease the financial burden on the localities that build it.

Condemnation: A judicial or administrative proceeding to exercise the power of eminent domain, through which a government agency takes private property for public use and compensates the owner.

Congestion: Is defined by Caltrans as reduced speeds of less than 35 mile per hour for longer than 15 minutes.

Page 1940 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Congestion Management Plan: The monitoring and mitigation of increased congestion on regional routes and transit systems.

Congestion Management Program (CMP): Is an integrated approach to programming transportation improvements. This approach requires detailed consideration of the complex relationships among transportation, land use and air quality.

Congestion Management System (CMS): Is required by Inter modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act ( ISTEA) to be implemented by states to improve transportation planning.

Construction Contract: A signed, written agreement between the City and the Contractor that describes, among other things, what work will be done and when; who provides labor and materials; and how the Contractor will be paid.

Construction Phase: A specific phase of the project during which project design is implemented.

Consumer Price Index (CPI): A statistical description of price levels provided by the U.S. Department of Labor. The change in the index from year to year is used to measure the cost of living and economic inflation.

Contingency (Reserve): A budget reserve set aside for emergencies or unforeseen expenditures not otherwise budgeted for.

Please see “Supplemental” portion of this Policy Budget for details on the City Council's reserve policies.

Contract Total: The sum of the total estimated costs from the list of Contractor bid items.

Contractor: The individual, partnership, firm, corporation, or joint venture, contracting with the City to do prescribed work as defined in the construction contract.

Contractual Services: Expenditures for services the City received from an outside company. Professional and technical services performed by non-City of Richmond (COR) staff is considered contractual services.

Coordination Meeting: A meeting conducted just prior to one of the following milestones: 30% PS&E, 70% PS&E, 95% PS&E. The purpose of a coordination meeting is open discussion of issues and comments related to a project’s design, Plan Set, Specific ations Package, and Engineer’s Estimate.

Corridor: A major transportation route which can consist of one or more highways, arterial streets, transit lines, rail lines and/or bikeways.

Page 1941 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Council of Governments (COG): Is a voluntary consortium of local government representatives, from contiguous communities, meeting on a regular basis, and formed to cooperate on common planning and solve common development problems of their area.

COGs can function as the RTPAs and MPOs in urbanized areas.

County Road Engineer (CRE): Individual responsible for establishing and maintaining engineering standards, practices and professionalism for the Road Services Division, and approving and stamping final plans and record drawings.

Critical Area: Any of those areas that are subject to natural hazards or those land features tha t support unique, fragile or valuable natural resources including fishes, wildlife and other organisms and their habitat, and such resources that carry, hold or purify water in their natural state. Critical areas include: aquatic area, coal mine hazard area, critical aquifer recharge area, erosion hazard area, flood hazard area, landslide hazard area, seismic hazard area, steep slope hazard area, volcanic hazard area, wetlands, wildl ife habitat conservation area, and wildlife habitat network.

Debt Service: Payment of interest and repayment of principal to holders of the City's debt instruments.

Debt Service Fund: This fund type is used to account for the payment and accumulation of resources related to general long- term debt principal and interest.

Dedicated Funds; Federal, state or local funds which can be used only for specific purposes or by specific agencies.

Deficit: 1) The excess of entity's liabilities over its assets (See Fund Balance). 2) The excess of expenditures or expenses ov er revenues during a single accounting period.

Demand Capacity Ratio (D/C): Is the relationship between the demands for vehicle trips on a facility versus the number of vehicle trips that can be accommodated on that facility.

Demonstration Funds (DEMO): Federal transportation acts sometime target specific projects in various states in addition to general programs for federal support. This funding category includes "demonstration" funding provided under the ISTEA, as well as "high priority project" funding provided under TEA -21. These projects for "demonstration" or "high priority project" funding often have special rules applying to their use.

Department/Agency: A major unit of the municipal organization which is managed by an Agency/Department Director and comprised of a number of divisions which are functionally related to one another.

Page 1942 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Department of Transportation (DOT) : A federal agency that implements the nation's overall transportation policy. The DOT establishes overall transportation policy for the United States. Under the DOT umbrella are 11 administrations whose jurisdictions include highway planning, development, and construction; urban mass transit; railroads; aviation; and the safety of por ts, highways, and oil and gas pipelines. Decisions made by the department in conjunction with appropriate state and local officials can significantly affect other programs such as land planning, energy conservation, scarce resource utilization, and technological change.

Depreciation: 1) Expiration in the service life of capital assets attributable to wear and tear, deterioration and or action of the physical elements. 2) That portion of the cost of capital asset which is charged as an expense during a particular period.

Design Phase: A specific phase of the project when the concept is formulated into plans and specifications.

Development: Means the following activities: (1) the division of a parcel of land into two or more parcels; (2) the construction, reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation, enlargement, or demolition of a structure, excavation, landfil l, or deposition; and (3) any use, or change in the use, of any structure, or land, or extension of use of land.

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE): A DBE is a for -profit small business concern that is at least 51 percent owned by one or more individuals who are both socially and economically disadvantaged. In the case of a corporation, 51 percent of the stock is owned by one or more such individuals; and, whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more of the socially and economically disadvantaged individuals who own it.

Disbursement: The expenditure of monies from an account.

Discretionary Funds: Federal, state and local funds which can be used for a variety of purposes are determined by local needs and priorities.

District System Management Plan (DSMP): Is a part of the system planning process and refers to a long -range plan for management of transportation systems in its jurisdiction.

Division: A unit of the municipal organization which reports to a department or agency.

Documentary Transfer Tax: This is a 0.7% tax on the fair market value that is imposed on the transfer or sale of real property.

Page 1943 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Easement: A right to use the land of another for a specific purpose, sometimes referred to as a “ deed restriction''. Easements may be purchased from the property owner or donated by the owner to an agency. The holder of an easement agrees to perform periodic inspections and to take the legal action, if necessary, to ensure that easement provisions are met.

Easement by Necessity: An easement allowed by law as necessary for the full enjoyment of a parcel of real estate; for example, a right of ingress and egress over a grantor's land.

Economic Development: Investment of resources to create financial self -sufficiency and prosperity in a community, including the industrial, commercial, and service sectors.

Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) : In 1992, the State of California found itself in a serious deficit position. To meet its obligations to fund education at specified levels under Proposition 98, the state enacted legislation that shifted partial financial responsibility for funding edu cation to local government (cities, counties and special districts). The state did this by instructing county auditors to shift the allocation of local property tax revenues from local government to “educational revenue augmentation funds” (ERAFs), directing that specified amounts of city, county and other local agency property taxes be deposited into these funds to support schools.

Eminent Domain: The right of a government or municipal quasi-public body to acquire property for public use through a court action called condemnation, in which the court decides that the use is a public use and determines the compensation to be paid to th e owner.

Encroachment: A structure or part of a structure that occupies the property of another.

Encumbrance: Funds designated out of an appropriation to be spent on a specific purpose. The function of an encumbrance is to guarantee dollars will be available to pay bills when due.

Engineer’s Estimate: A detailed construction cost estimate including a list of contractor bid items, estimated quantities and estimated unit prices, the Contract Total, sales tax, contingency costs, cost of work to be done by City crews, cost of work to be done by others, value of material furnished by City, estimated cost of incentives, and reimbu rsable. Engineer’s Estimates are generally labeled as 70% Engineer’s Estimate, 95% Engineer’s Estimate, and 100% Engineer’s Estimate.

Page 1944 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Enterprise Fund: A governmental accounting fund in which the services provided are financed and operated similarly to those of a private business. The rate schedules for these services are established to ensure that the revenues are adequate to meet all necessary expenditures.

Environmental and Community Investment Agreement (ECIA ): On July 29, 2014, the Richmond City Council approved the Environmental and Community Investment Agreement (ECIA), which will invest $90 million dollars to the Richmond community over 10-years. The ECIA includes investments in community programs, a scholarship program, competitive community grants, community-based greenhouse gas reduction programs, and a photovoltaic solar farm.

Environmental Impact Report (EIR): A study of all the factors which a land development or construction project would have on the environment in the area, including population, traffic, schools, fire protection, endangered species, archeological artifacts , and community beauty. Many states require such reports be submitted to local governments before the development or project can be approved, unless the governmental body finds there is no possible impact, which finding is called a "negative declaration."

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS): An environmental review document prepared in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and/or National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA) when the lead agency determines a proposal is likely to result in significant adverse environmental impacts.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) : An independent federal agency, created in 1970, that sets and enforces rules and standards that protect the environment and control pollution.

Equal Employment Opport unity (EEO): EEO laws make it illegal for employers to discriminate against an employee or potential employee in certain workplaces.

Expense: Charges incurred (whether paid immediately or unpaid) for operations, maintenance, interest, or other charges.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) : The FEMA is the federal agency responsible for coordinating emergency planning, preparedness, risk reduction, response, and recovery. The agency works closely with state and local governments by funding emergency programs and providing technical guidance and training. These coordinated activities at the federal, state, and local levels ensure a broad-based emergency program to insure public safety and protect property.

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): The federal agency responsible for the approval of transportation projects that affect the federal highway system. Administratively, FHWA is part of the DOT.

Page 1945 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP): Also referred to as the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). This is a short-range action plan to the long-range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). It identifies specifically what projects will be funded within the next 3 - 7 years.

Fiduciary Funds: Account for assets held in a trustee or agency capacity for others, and therefore cannot be used to support the government's own program.

Financial Plan: A parent document for the budget which establishes management policies, goals, and objectives for all programs within the City over a one-year period (see Budget).

Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI): Is a document prepared by a federal agency showing why a proposed action would not have a significant impact on the environment and thus would not require preparation of an EIS. A FONSI is based on the results of an environmental assessment.

Fines and Forfeitures: Fines and Forfeitures consist primarily of fines for parking violations on the City’s streets, Municipal Court fines and Library fines.

Fiscal Impact Analysis: The analysis of the estimated taxes that a development project would generate in comparison to the cost of providing municipal services demanded by that project.

Fiscal Year: The 12-month operating period of the government. For the City, this period begins July 1 st and ends June 30th.

Fixed Assets: Assets of long-term nature such as land, buildings, machinery, furniture, and other equipment. The City has defined such assets as those with an expected life in excess of one year and an acquisition cost in excess of $5,000.

Fixed Charges: Are items of expenditures for services rendered by internal operations of the City. Rental of City equipment, computer services, building rental, indirect operating expenses, and depreciation are examples of fixed charges.

Flood Control: The specific regulations and practices that reduce or prevent the damage caused by storm water runoff.

Franchise Fees: A .5% to 5% fee imposed on franchise revenue in accordance with franchise agreements with utility companies.

Freeway Capacity: Is the maximum sustained 15 minute rate of flow that can be accommodated by a uniform freeway segment under prevailing traffic and roadway conditions in a specified direction.

Page 1946 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Fringe Benefits: These include employee retirement, social security, health, dental, life insurance, worker's compensation, uniforms, and deferred compensation plans.

Full-Time Equivalent (FTE): An FTE or full-time equivalent is defined as a staff year. For example, two employees who work one- half time are considered one full-time equivalent.

Functional Classification: Guided by federal legislation, refers to a process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes or systems, according to the character of the service that is provided, i.e., Principal Arterials, Minor Arterial Roads, Collector Roads, Local Roads.

Fund: A set of internal accounts that records revenue, expenditures, and obligations related to a specific purpose.

Fund Accounting: Governments use funds to account for activities within the entity.

Fund Balance: The net effect of assets less liabilit ies at any given point in time. The total fund balance includes a designated/reserved portion, usually for encumbrances, projects, or other prior commitments, as well as an undesignated/unreserved (i.e., “available”) portion.

General Fund: The fund supported by taxes, fees and other revenues that may be used for any lawful purpose. The general fund accounts for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund.

General Ledger (GL) : Central repository of the accounting information of an agency in which the summaries of all financial transactions (culled from subsidiary ledgers) during an accounting period are recorded. Includes revenue and expenditure transactions for all accounts within the agency.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP): Uniform minimum standards for financial accounting and recording, encompassing the conventions, rules, and procedures that define accepted accounting principles.

Governmental Funds: Account for activities that are primarily tax-supported operations or other mandatory payments.

Grant: A contribution by a government, other organization, or a private individual to support a particular function. Grants may be classified as either categorical or block, depending upon the amount of discretion allowed the grantee. Grants may be competi tive or based on allocation.

Page 1947 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Growth Management: The conscious public decision to restrain, accommodate or induce development in any geographic setting and at any governmental level. Growth management systems provide a means for governments to establish comprehensive goals and objectives designed to address the problems of growth through an integrated system of administrative, financial and regulatory programs.

High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV): Are a lane of freeway reserved for the use of vehicles with more than a preset number of occupants; such vehicles often include buses, taxis and carpools.

Highway Capacity Manual (HCM): Revised in 1994 by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council, the HCM presents various methodologies for analyzing the operation (see Level of Service) of transportation systems as freeways, arterial, transit, and pedestrian facilities.

Impact Fees: Costs imposed on new development to fund public facility improvements required by new development and ease fiscal burdens on localities.

Infrastructure: Those capital facilities and land assets under public ownership, or operated or maintained for public benefit, that are necessary to support development and redevelopment and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Infrastructure syst ems may include, but are not limited to, transportation, energy, telecommunications, far mland retention, water supply, wastewater disposal, storm water management, shore protection, open space and recreation, solid waste disposal, public health care, publ ic education, higher education, arts, historic resources, public safety, justice, public administration, and public housing.

Initial Study: The preliminary analysis that the lead agency prepares in order to determine whether to prepare a negative declaration or an Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) and, if necessary, to identify the impacts to be analyzed in the EIR. When the agency determines that an EIR is unnecessary, the study serves the purpose of providing documentation of the factual basis for concl uding that a negative declaration will suffice.

Inspector: The Project Engineer’s representative who inspects construction contract performance in detail, including how the approved design is implemented in the field.

Page 1948 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Intelligent Transportation System (ITS): Applications of information technology to enhance transportation system management, e.g., real-time information about traffic incidents, routing alternatives and/or the guidance of vehicles through remotely -controlled equipment.

Inter-fund Transfers: The movement of monies between funds of the same governmental entity.

Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA): Federal legislation which provided for major restructuring of the federal funding program. Re-authorized as the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21).

Internal Service Charges: The charges to user departments for internal service provided by another government agency, such as fleet maintenance or insurance funded from a central pool.

Interregional Road System (IRRS): Is a series of Interregional state highway routes, outside the urbanized areas, that provide access to, and links between, the state's economic centers, major recreational areas, and urban and rural regions.

Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan (ITSP): Describes and communicates the framework in which the state will carry out its responsibilities for the Interregional Improvement Program (IIP). It also identifies how Caltrans will work with regional agencies to consult and seek consensus on the relative priority of improvements. The plan is evaluated in terms of its progress in carrying out its objectives, strategies and actions and updated accordingly on a biennial basis.

Investment: Securities and real estate purchased and hel d for the production of income in the form of interest, dividends, rental or base payments.

There are no terms at this time.

Land Use Planning: Generic term used to describe zoning results such as environmental impact, allowable development uses, historic/cultural preservation, etc.

Page 1949 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Lead Agency: The agency or agencies that have taken the primary responsibility for preparing the environmental impact statement.

Legal Description: A method of describing a particular parcel of land in such a way that it uniquely describes the particular parcel and no other. A legal description may be a simple reference to a lot as shown on a subdivision plat, or be described by metes and bounds. To be adequate, it should be sufficient to locate the property without oral testimony.

Letter of Transmittal: The opening section of the budget, which provides the City Council and the public with a general summary of the most important aspects of the budget, changes from the previous fiscal years, and the views and recommendations of the City Administrator.

Level of Service (LOS): Is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream; generally described in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. LOS A represents free flow, and LOS F represents gridlock.

Liability: Debt or other legal obligation arising out of transaction in the past which must be liquidated, renewed or refunded at some future date; financial obligations entered in the balance sheet. Note: The term doesn't include encumbrances.

Licenses and Permits: Revenues under this category are from fees for business licenses, building regulation and planning permits.

In Richmond, the Business License Tax is charged annually at different rates depending on the Business Tax Category. Licenses and Permits revenue comes from construction permits from the construction of sidewalks, driveways, sewer, grading and excavating, encroachment and obstruction.

Line Item Budget: A budget that lists detailed expenditure cat egories (salary, material, telephone service, travel, etc.) separately, along with the amount budgeted for each specified category. The City uses a line- item detail to maintain and record for financial reporting and control purpose. (See General Ledger Accounts & Commitment Item)

Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF): Program established by the state to enable treasurers to place idle funds in a pool for investment. Each agency is currently limited to LAIF of an investment of $20 million plus any bond proceeds.

Local and Regional Level of Service Standards: Identifies the level of service standards set by local and regional jurisdictions in general plans and congestion management programs.

Long Range Transportation Plan: A 15 to 20 year forecast plan tha t must consider a wide range of social, environmental, energy and economic factors. The plan addresses overall regional goals and how transportation can best meet those goals within financial limits.

Page 1950 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Market Value: What a willing seller could reasonably expect to receive if he/she were to sell the property on the open market to a willing buyer.

Master Plan: A plan prepared to specify and coordinate the provision of one or more infrastructure systems and related services.

Maturities: The dates on which the principal or stated values of investments or debt obligations mature and may be reclaimed.

Measure Q - City Sales Tax: A one-half of one percent (1/2%) sales tax increment approved by Richmond voters in the November 2004 election. This increased the Richmond tax from 8.25% to 8.75%.

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) : A document that expresses mutual accord on an issue between two or more parties. Memoranda of understanding are generally recognized as binding, even if no legal claim could be based on the rights and obligations laid down in them. To be legally operative, a memorandum of understanding must (1) identify the contracting parties, (2) spell out the subject matter of the agreement and its objectives, (3) summarize the essential terms of the agreement, and (4) must be signed by the contracting parties.

Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO): A federally required planning body responsible for the transportation planning and project selection in its region. The Governor designates an MPO in every urbanized area with a population of over 50,000 people.

Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP): A listing of highway and transit projects that the region hopes to fund.

Milestone: A tangible point in time that tells how far along a project is in the process.

Mission Statement: Provides policy guidance and direction for the highest priority objectives to be accomplished during the budget period. Over the last several years, the City Council has developed community goals and long- range vision for the City, which best summarize expectations of the community.

Mitigated Negative Declaration: Under the CEQA, if an initial study reveals substantial evidence that significant environmental effects might occur, the project proponent can modify the project so as to eliminate all such possible significant impacts or reduce them to a level of insignificance.

Page 1951 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Mitigation: One or more of the following approaches to mitigate environmental impact(s) with an emphasis on attempting those measures in the sequence in which they are listed: (1) avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; (2) minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; (3) rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment; (4) reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preserv ation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; and (5) compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitut e resources or environments.

Model, Mode Choice: Is a model used to forecast the proportion of total person trips on each of the available transportation modes.

Modified Accrual Basis: The basis of accounting under which expenditures, whether paid or unpaid, are formally recognized when incurred against the account, but revenues are recognized only when they become both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current accounting period. All governmental funds use the modified accrual basis of accounting.

Municipal Bonds: Interest-bearing obligations issued by state or local governments to finance operating or capital costs. The principal characteristic that has traditionally set municipal bonds apart from other capital market securities is the exemption of interest income from Federal income tax.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): Federal legislation that requires consideration of environmental consequences of a project before the project can begin. If a study indicates that there are undesirable environmental consequences of a proposed project, they requires either that consideration be given to "mitigating" measures built into the project that would lessen the environmental damage, or that alternatives (different ways of accomplishing the project goals) be considered that would be less damaging to the environment. NEPA applies t o any major federal, state, county, city, or industrial projects that require a Federal permit or receive funding from a Federal agency.

National Highway System (NHS): Consists of 155,00 miles (plus or minus 15 percent) of the major roads in the U.S. Included will be all Interstate routes, a large percentage of urban and rural principal arterials, the defense strategic highway network, and strategic highway connectors.

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Two-phased surface water qual ity program authorized by Congress as part of the 1987 Clean Water Act.

Natural Diversity Information: Identifies special status of habitats and species found within 300 meters of centerline of the existing highway facility.

Page 1952 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Negative Declaration: Under the CEQA, a Negative Declaration is prepared when, after completing an initial study, a lead agency determines that a project "would not have a significant effect on the environment".

Non-Attainment Area: An air basin that does not meet existing state or federal air quality standards.

Notice of Completion (NOC): The CEQA requires a notice to the public that a draft environmental impact report has been completed.

Notice of Determination (NOD): Under the CEQA, a Notice of Determination is filed by the lead environmental regulatory agency once it has decided to implement or approve a project for which it has approved a negative declaration.

Notice of Intent (NOI): Under NEPA, the first formal step in the environmental impact statement process, consisting of a notice with the following information: a description of the proposed action and alternatives; a description of the agency's proposed scoping process, including scoping meetings; and the name and address of the persons to contact within the lead agency regarding the environmental impact statement.

Notice of Preparation (NOP): The CEQA requires this notice to the public that an EIR will be prepared for a proposed development.

It allows time for members of the community to submit their environmental concerns regarding a proposed development.

Notice to Proceed: A letter signed by the Project Engineer and issued to the Contractor granting notice that construction must begin within a designated period.

Objectives: Departmental statements describing significant activities to be accomplished during the fiscal year.

Obligation: The Federal government's legal commitment (promise) to pay or reimburse the states or other entities for the Federal share of a project's eligible costs.

Operating Budget: A financial plan for the provision of City services and basic gov ernmental functions. The operating budget contains appropriations for such expenditures as personnel services, fringe benefits, commodities, services and minor capital expenses. It does not include Capital Improvement Plan expenditures.

Operations and M aintenance: Expenditures related to operating costs including supplies, commodities, contract services, materials, utilities and educational services.

Page 1953 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Ordinance: A formal legislative enactment by the governing board (City Council) of a municipality. If i t is not in conflict with any higher form of law, it has the full force and effect of law within the boundaries of the municipality to which it applies.

Outfall: The point where wastewater or drainage discharges from a sewer pipe, ditch, or other conveyance to a receiving body of water.

Performance Measures: Specific quantitative measures of work performed within an activity or program (e.g., total miles of streets cleaned). Also, a specific quantitative measure of results obtained through a program or activity (e.g., reduced incidence of vandalism due to new street lighting program).

Permits/Approvals: Required permissions from regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the work or location of the project.

Permitting Authority: The NPDES authorized state agency or EPA regional office that administers the NPDES program, issuing permits, providing compliance assistance, conducting inspections, and enforcing the NPDES program.

Personnel Services: Expenditures related to employee compensation including wages and salaries, fringe benefits, retirement, premiums, allowances and special/supplemental pay such as shift differentials.

Phase: Series of related activities during a project’s lifecycle, usually culminating in the completion of a major deliverable.

Plat Map: A map of a town, section or subdivision indicating the location and boundaries of individual properties.

Pre-construction Conference (Precon): A meeting held with the Contractor and City of Richmond staff with the purpose of introducing all parties invol ved in project construction, identifying critical project issues, and answering Contractor questions. The meeting occurs between contract execution and Notice to Proceed.

Program: An activity, or division, within a department which furthers the objectiv es of the City Council, by providing services or a product.

Program Budget: Programs, and associated program codes, are created to articulate the programmatic functions performed by the City organization. The budget (both revenues and expenditures) can be described in programmatic terms. This enables the Mayor and City Council to view how much is being committed and/or spent to achieve their goals and objectives.

Page 1954 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Programming: The designation of funds for transportation projects which when approved is included in the TIP.

Project: A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product or service. It can be considered to be any series of activities and tasks that have: (1) A specific objective to be completed within certain specifications; (2) defined start and end dates; and (3) funding limits and consumed resources. Generally, this is a construction project but could be any undertaking requiring a joint effort wherein a scope, schedule, budget, and desired outcome has been defined.

Project Closeout Phase: A specific phase of the project when construction tasks are completed, contractual and administrative requirements are completed and the project files are archived.

Project Manager: The person responsible for leading the team; delivering the project within an approved scope, schedule and budget; conducting quality assurance of the project products; monitoring project progress; and overseeing the project from Pr e- Design Phase through Project Close Out Phase.

Project Report: Is a conceptual engineering report that describes the work in more detail than the PSR.

Project Study Report (PSR): Is the pre -programming document required before a project may be included in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).

Property Tax: A major portion of the revenues of the City is from property taxes. Property such as land, structures and improvements is subject to tax which is applied to a property’s value. In 1978, Proposition 13 revised the calculation of the California property taxes by establishing a fixed rate of one percent of a property’s value and thereby limiting the growth in assessed valuation to 2% per year. The exception to this is when property changes hands, in which case fair value becomes the basis of valuation. The City receives its share of property taxes during the months of December, April and June of each fiscal year at 55%, 40% and 5% of the total amount. Of the total property tax received, approximately 48% is General Fund, 16% is Sewer, 24% is Pension Tax Override and 12% is from Assessment Districts.

Proprietary Funds: Account for activities that are primarily funded by income from operations resulting from payments for goods and services provided to users.

PS&E: Plans, Specifications and Estimates

Punchlist: A list of items generated following the Final Inspection consisting of work the Contractor must complete before the project is considered complete and the Notice of Completion and Acceptance is issued.

Page 1955 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

There are no terms at this time.

Ready-to-Ad: A document that confirms funds is available for construction; it is signed by the Finance Manager of the Capital Improvement Plan Unit and CRE and is required prior to advertisement of the project.

Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS): A six month period schedule that sets forth the nature, amount, and source of payment for all enforceable obligations of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency.

Record of Decision (ROD): Under the NEPA, a public document that reflects the agency's final decision, rationale behind that decision, and commitments to monitoring and mitigation.

Redevelopment Agency: The governing body created to designate redevelopment project areas, supervise and coordinate planning for a project area, and implement the development program.

Redevelopment Plan: Plan for revitalization and redevelopment of land within the project area in order to eliminate blight and remedy the conditions that caused it.

Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTP): A trust fund from the collection of the property tax revenues from the dissolved redevelopment agencies that’s used to pay enforceable obligations.

Reimbursements: Payments remitted by another agency, department, or fund to help defray the costs of a particular service or activity for which some benefit was obtained by the reimbursing party. These amounts are recorded as expenditures, or expenses in the reimbursing fund and as a reduction of expenditures, or expenses, in the fund that is reimbursed.

Relocation: The effort to assist and facilitate re- housing of families and single persons, businesses or organizations that are displaced due to redevelopment activities.

Relocation Assistance: Relocation payments help to assist families, individuals, businesses, an d non-profit organizations that are displaced as a result of redevelopment activities. This includes aid in finding a new location, payments to help cover moving costs, and additional payments for certain other costs.

Page 1956 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Reserved Fund Balance: A portion of a fund’s balance that is legally restricted for a specific purpose and is, therefore, not available for general appropriation.

Resolution: A special order of the City Council which requires less legal formality than an Ordinance in terms of public notice and the number of public readings prior to approval. A Resolution has lower legal standing than an Ordinance. The adopted operating budget is approved by Resolution and requires a majority vote of the City Council members present at the time of adoption.

Revenue: Funds that the City receives as income. It includes such items as taxes, licenses, user fees/charges for services, fines/penalties, grants, and internal revenue.

Revenue Estimates: A formal estimate of how much revenue will be earned from a specific revenue source for some future period; typically, a future fiscal year.

Right-of-Way (ROW): The right given by one landowner to another to pass over the land actually transferring ownership. ROW is granted by deed or easement, for construction and maintenance according to a designated use. This may include highways, streets, canals, ditches, or other uses.

Runoff: Drainage or flood discharge that leaves an area as surface flow or as pipeline flow.

Salaries and Benefits: An operating budget category which generally accounts for full -time and part-time salaries, overtime costs, and fringe benefits.

Sales and Use Tax: The current Sales Tax rate in Richmond is 8.75%. The City’s share of this is 1% percent, with the State getting

6.25%. Sales tax revenue is influenced by different factors such as the number of retail outlets, the interest rates, disposable income, and the rate of inflation. Richmond also has revenue sharing agreements with the City of El Cerrito.

Schedule: The planned dates for performing activities and the planned dates for meeting milestones.

Secondary Access: A second means for vehicles to get into or leave a neighborhood or development. Having more than one means of access tends to distribute traffic more evenly, and is considered critical for emergency vehicle access.

Sewer: Any pipe or conduit used to collect and carry away sewage or storm water runoff from the generating source to the treatment plant or receiving stream.

Page 1957 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Sewer Capital: Fees collected by the City for future expansion and capacity increases of the sewer and waste water systems.

Source of Revenue: Revenues are classified according to their source or point of origin.

Special Revenue Fund: Used to account for the proceeds of special revenue sources that are restricted by law (or administrative action) to expenditures for specific purposes.

Specifications Package: A packet of information made up of Standard Specifications and Special Provisions that forms the basis of the construction contract defining the work to be done, the material requirements, the construction requirements, the methods of measurement, and the methods of payment during construction. The Specifications Package is generally referred to as either 70% Spec Package, 95% Spec Package or 100% Spec Package.

State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP): The statewide C IP adopted biennially by the California Transportation Commission, which includes all major transportation projects funded by state or Federal funds.

Statement of Overriding Considerations: Provides an agency with a means to adopt a projec t with unmitigated significant environmental impacts. The CEQA requires the decision-maker to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a propos ed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered acceptable.

Storm Drain: An opening leading to an underground pipe or open ditch for carrying surface runoff, separate from the sanitary sewer or wastewater system.

Storm Drain Fund: Fees received from developers for storm drain facilities.

Stormwater: Precipitation that accumulates in natural and/or constructed storage and storm water systems during and immediately following a storm event.

Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP): A plan to describe a process though which a facility thoroughly evaluates potential pollutant sources at a site and selects and implements appropriate measures designed to prevent or control the disc harge of pollutants in storm water runoff.

Street, Arterial: A thoroughfare designed to carry vehicular traffic between neighborhoods and from surrounding areas into and out of the city.

Page 1958 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Street, Collector: A street that directs neighborhood vehicular traffic t o the arterial street system; it basically serves the surrounding neighborhoods, not the wider community.

Street, Local: A street that provides access to adjacent properties and allows for vehicular traffic circulation within a neighborhood.

Successor Agency: An agency that is authorized by law to accept and maintain the legal title, custody, and dominion of records that were created by the former redevelopment agencies.

Supplemental Appropriation: An act appropriating funds in addition to those in an annual appropriation act. Supplemental appropriations provide additional budget authority beyond the original estimates f or programs or activities (including new programs authorized after the date of the original appropriation act) in cases where the need for funds is too urgent to be postponed until enactment of the next regular appropriation bill.

Supplies and Services: This budget category accounts for all personnel, and capital outlay expenses.

Surface Runoff: The portion of rainfall that moves over the ground toward a lower elevation and does not infiltrate the soil.

Sustainable Development: Development with the goal of preserving environmental quality, natural resources and livability for present and future generations. Sustainable initiatives work to ensure efficient use of resources.

System Capacity: The ability of natural, infrastructur e, social and economic systems to accommodate growth and development without degrading or exceeding the limits of those systems, as determined by a carrying capacity analysis.

Tax Allocation Bond: A bond or financial obligation issued by the agency i n order to generate funds to implement the redevelopment plan. The bond is repaid with tax increments flowing to the agency as a result of actions of the agency to revitalize the project area.

Tax Increment: The increase in property taxes within the redevelopment project area that result from increases in the project area assessed value that exceeds the base year assessed value.

Transfer: A movement of budgetary or actual revenues or expenditures between organizational units, accounts, projects, programs or funds. Transfers between funds appear as an expenditure (“transfer out”) in one fund and revenue (“transfer in”) in the other.

Page 1959 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Transfers In/Out: Payments from one fund to another fund, primarily for work or services provided.

Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT): The TOT at 10% is imposed on and paid by the hotel/motel lodgers who stay less than thirty days. The tax is collected and remitted by hotel/motel operators.

Utility Users Tax (UUT): A 10% tax imposed on utility (telecommunication, gas, electricity, water and video) revenue.

Page 1960 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

X
There are no terms at this time.

Y
There are no terms at this time.

Page 1961 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

List of Acronyms

Page 1962 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Page 1963 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Page 1964 of 2511 ends

Budget Glossary

Page 1965 of 2511 ends

1 City of Richmond
Fiscal Year 2022-2023
Proposed Operating Budget
Shasa Curl, City Manager
Delmy Cuellar, Director of Finance
June 21, 2022

Page 1966 of 2511 ends

Overview
 Proposed FY 2022-23 General Fund Balanced Budget
 General Fund Revenue Assumptions & Estimates
 General Fund Expenditure Assumptions & Estimates
 Proposed Operating Transfers Out
 Adjustments Made to Balance the Budget
 General Fund Reserve Level
 Non-General Fund
 Capital Improvement Budget
 Fiscal Headwinds
 Next Steps & Questions
2

Page 1967 of 2511 ends

Proposed FY 2022-23
General Fund Balanced Budget
3 GENERAL FUND May 3, 2022 June 7, 2022 June 21, 2022 TOTAL REVENUE 206,360,370 206,483,393 206,632,248
TOTAL EXPENSE 206,332,516 201,969,824 206,632,248
Net (-Gap)/+Surplus 27,854 4,513,569 0.00

Page 1968 of 2511 ends

General Fund Revenue Assumptions to Date
Revenue Category Assumptions
PROPERTY TAXES Assessed Value (AV) Growth based on (1) most properties increasing by State posted CPI (usually 2% max), (2) plus, for the properties that sold in 2021, the new value minus the previous value, and (3) the value of the Chevron Refinery. Staff usually assumes the Chevron refinery will stay the same - 0% AV growth for that component.

SALES & USE TAX 4% growth per the consultant; Vehicle License Fee Backfill Swap tied to AV growth, same as Secured Property Taxes.

UTILITY USERS TAX (UUT) Analysis in part provided by consultant. Growth rates applied to individual revenue streams with the UUT category - cable and Telecom historically have been going down due to industry changes. Settlement amount is set and due to go away after FY24-25. Cap amount paid by Chevron is based on Energy Services CPI for the Bay Area which through the posted rates through February is extremely high.

OTHER TAXES Each revenue stream within Other Taxes changes year-to-year based on independent influences; both garbage fees are up by 4% based on historical changes; Hotel Tax up 5% based on rebounding industry; Transfer Tax budgeted amount based on formula in Guiding Fiscal Policy that mandates we use the mean since implementation of the voter approved tiered structure; gas and electricity franchise changes stem from using same growth factor as UUT.

LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES Main item is Business Tax and are using growth factor of 2% as a conservative CPI. Still new revenue stream so we still do not know what the full year amount will be.

FINES & FORFEITURES Parking citations flat and Muni Court Fines with 1.4% growth USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY Flat - zero growth
CHARGES FOR SERVICES Most items entered by corresponding departments based on their estimated level of service and total corresponds to 4.3% growth OTHER REVENUE Very unpredictable. Usually very little budgeted here, but items get added as received.

RENTAL INCOME Rental Income is determined based on the Council approved agreements and/or fees established through the Master Fee Schedule INTERGOV STATE TAXES Motor Vehicle Fees increase based on YTD actuals in FY21-22 INTERGOV OTHER GRANT Only grants with award letters are budgeted PROCEED FROM SALE PROPERTY Pending budget, based on historic trend OPERATING TRANSFERS IN Based on Analysis of the Pension Tax Override fund, estimated AV growth, minus scheduled uses. Left over funds are transferred to the General Fund 4

Page 1969 of 2511 ends

General Fund Revenue Estimates
5*Current Year (CY)
REVENUES FY 2022-2023

REVISED BUDGET
FY 2022-2023

PROPOSED BUDGET CHANGE
PROPERTY TAXES 45,233,561 46,056,962 1.80%
SALES & USE TAX 51,993,736 55,282,200 6.30%
UTILITY USERS TAX 46,522,663 49,963,589 7.40%
OTHER TAXES 20,953,343 21,638,449 3.30%
LICENSES, PRMITS&FEES 10,354,335 11,129,402 7.50%
FINES & FORFEITURES 468,897 475,275 1.40%
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY 236,079 236,079 0.00%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3,424,459 3,571,292 4.30%
OTHER REVENUE 1,473,927 187,500 -87.30%
RENTAL INCOME 747,268 874,506 17.00%
INTERGOV STATE TAXES 90,000 125,000 38.90%
INTERGOV STATE GRANT 187,878 175,000 -6.90%
INTERGOV OTHER GRANT 153,569 253,569 65.10%
PROC FR SLE PROP 100,000 100,000 0.00%
LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS 36,400 - -100.00%
OPER XFERS IN 10,204,224 16,563,424 62.30%
TOTAL REVENUE 192,180,338 206,632,248 7.50%

Page 1970 of 2511 ends

General Fund Expenditure Assumptions to Date
Expenditures Category Assumptions/Descriptions
SALARIES AND WAGES IAFF, RFMA, RPMA, RPOA negotiations pending, Executive, Local 21 and Local 1021 5 percent COLA as of 1/1/2023, other pays based on existing MOUs and current enrollments.

PAYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT Healthcare cost at current rates as of FY2022, OPEB per current Actuarial report, Retirement rates per current CalPERS rates. Worker's Comp rate 1 % increase in each category PROFESSIONAL & ADMIN Baseline budget, with one-time appropriations removed, City Attorney Legal Services Contract $1.5 million OTHER OPERATING Baseline budget with one-time appropriations removed.

UTILITIES Baseline budget
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS Baseline Budget based on historical actuals PROVISN FOR INS LOSS Insurance Premiums
COST POOL (Vehicle Replacement) Fleet Services provided list with Priority 1 items COST POOL (General Liability) 5% increase from current year budget COST POOL (Cost Allocation Plan - Admin Charges) 5% increase from current year budget COST POOL (Civic Center Debt Allocation) Charge derived from the debt service, cash balance, and square footage used by divisions ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY As needed
DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE Debt Service Schedule, maintained by Treasury A87 COST PLAN REIMBS Based on COST POOL (Cost Allocation Plan - Admin Charges) GRANT EXPENDITURES Based on the awarded grants
OPER XFERS OUT Recurring and onetime subsidies to non-GF programs. 6*International Association of Fire Firefighters (IAFF), Richmond Fire Management Association (RFMA), Richmond Police Management Association (RPMA), Richmond Police Officers Association (RPOA)

Page 1971 of 2511 ends

General Fund Expenditure Estimates
7 EXPENDITURES FY 2021-2022

REVISED BUDGET
FY 2022-2023

PROPOSED BUDGET CHANGE
SALARIES AND WAGES 75,822,428 78,761,868 3.9%
PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 62,143,352 66,929,804 7.7%
PROF & ADMIN 16,248,412 16,977,138 4.5%
OTHER OPERATING 7,225,103 8,720,902 20.7%
UTILITIES 5,010,518 5,399,957 7.8%
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 2,555,148 2,731,448 6.9%
PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 27,673 25,725 -7.0%
COST POOL 14,455,436 15,277,766 5.7%
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,416,551 2,422,136 71.0%
DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 1,065,359 1,037,009 -2.7%
A87 COST PLAN REIMBS -3,516,104 -3,531,610 0.4%
GRANT EXPENDITURES 82,500 2,500 -97.0%
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 12,801,419 11,877,605 -7.2%
TOTAL EXPENSE 195,337,796 206,632,248 5.8%Page 1972 of 2511 Proposed FY 22-23 General Fund Operating Transfers Out
8 Operating Transfers Out FY 2022-2023 Proposed Budget
Debt Service 1,744,390
Hilltop Lighting and Landscaping District 229,115
Marina Bay Lighting and Landscaping District 462,436
Employment and Training 743,201
Information Technology Equipment Replacement 100,000
Department of Children and Youth 3,936,896
Richmond Housing Authority 1,261,082
Pension Fund 100,485
Reimagining Public Safety - Unhoused Intervention 1,320,000 Reimagining Public Safety - Youthworks 1,980,000
Total 11,877,605Page 1973 of 2511
Adjustments Made to the Balanced Budget
9 Proposed Budget Savings/Revenue Adjustments Proposed Appropriations Current Estimated Surplus 4,513,570 COLA/Class & Comp 7,385,608 Vacancy Saving Factor - 6% 8,339,184 Inflation Factor - 5%* 1,410,215 Increase Transfer In from PTOR 148,800 City Attorney Legal Services 1,500,000 Other Savings 824,269 Point Molate Expenses 1,000,000
Additional Paving Index Investment 1,000,000
Housing First 425,000
Public Bank 750,000
Reparations, Equity, and Inclusion – Year One 250,000
Literacy Fair 5,000
Short-term Emergency Housing Interventions 100,000
New City-Wide Appropriations Request Not Included
City-Wide Positions Request Not Included
Total Available 13,825,823 Total Appropriations 13,825,823 *https://www.bls.gov/regions/west/news-release/consumerpriceindex_sanfrancisco.htm

Page 1974 of 2511 ends

Proposed FY 2022-2023 Non-General Fund Budget
Fund Type Proposed FY 2022-2023
Other Operations 27,075,053
Special Revenue 39,674,849
Capital Improvement 37,256,854
Debt Service 21,612,086
Enterprise 70,579,794
Internal Service 25,169,925
Housing 5,458,047
Richmond Housing Authority 4,880,044
Total 231,706,650
10Page 1975 of 2511
Proposed FY 2022-2023
Capital Improvement Proposed Budget
Fund Number Fund Name Proposed FY 2022-2023
1002 Gas Tax 2,815,755
1019 RMRA-SB1 2,395,337
1054 Engineering Grants 14,509,778
2001 General Capital 3,061,487
2002 Measure J 3,786,947
1004 Asset Seizure 20,000
1006 Outside Grants 8,662,839
2113 Fire Impact Fee 89,383
2110 Park Impact Fee 15,000
2111 Traffic Impact Fee 263,639
2116 Open Space Impact Fee 373,264
2117 Library Impact Fee 469,295
2120 Wastewater Impact Fee 794,130
Total Capital Project Funds $37,256,854
11Page 1976 of 2511
Fiscal Headwinds
Classification & Compensation Study and Vacancy Saving
COLA/Class &
Comp Study $7.4
million
Estimated Vacancy
Saving $8.3 million
(Approx. 6%)
12Page 1977 of 2511
*CalPERS
$367 million
**OPEB
$102 million
13 Fiscal Headwinds
Unfunded Liabilities
*Per CalPERS Annual Valuation Report for FY 2022-2023
**Per Van Iwaarden (consultant) Estimated Actuarially Determined Contribution for FY 2022-2023 AnalysisPage 1978 of 2511 Paving Condition Index points 60
Paving Condition Index Points 51
Year 1
PCI - 60 Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
PCI - 51
14 Fiscal Headwinds
Deteriorating Infrastructure – Paving Condition Index

Page 1979 of 2511 ends

15 Fiscal Headwinds
Underfunding of Risk Reserve
$3,047,073
$4,668,140
FY 2022-23 Budget
FY 2022-23 Budget

Page 1980 of 2511 ends

Next Steps
16 FY 2021-2022
September 2022, Year-End Clean Up
FY 2022–2023
FY 2022-2023 First Quarter Update ,
October 2022

Page 1981 of 2511 ends

THANK YOU
&
QUESTIONS?
17 “Juneteenth Freedom Underpass”
South 37th Street Underpass
Desi Mundo (2022)

Page 1982 of 2511 ends

Page 1 of 3 ends

June 21, 2022

Public Works

DATE: June 21, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM:

Joe Leach, PE, Public Works Director
Greg Hardesty, Parks & Landscaping Superintendent
Subject:

Public Hearing To Consider the Levy of Annual
Assessments for the Hilltop Landscape Maintenance
District
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total amount proposed to be assessed for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 for the operation of the Hilltop
Landscape Maintenance District (HLMD) is
$1,091,838. The City’s contribution to the District is $16,526 based on the general benefit to the City
conferred by the maintenance work, and there is an
additional $229,115 classified as Additional City Support that will be transferred from the City’s General Fund to the District. Both the City’s contribution and the
Additional City Support will be budgeted in the General Fund. The total of the assessment, the City’s
contribution, and the Additional City Support will then be $1,337,479.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

N/A

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Resolution approving the Engineer’s Report and ordering the levy and collection of assessments in the Hilltop
Landscape Maintenance District for the Fiscal Year 2022- 2023, and hold Public Hearing to consider the levy of
annual assessments for the Hilltop Landscape
Maintenance District.

AGENDA
REPORT

Page 1983 of 2511 ends

Page 2 of 3 ends

June 21, 2022
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

ADOPT a resolution approving the Engineer’s Report and
ordering the levy and collection of assessments in the
Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District for the Fiscal
Year 2022-2023, providing for a three percent increase in annual assessments - Public Works Department (Joe
Leach 620-5478/Greg Hardesty 620-6920).

DISCUSSION:

The Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District is an area in north Richmond consisting of 878 parcels of land benefited by landscaping improvements and maintenance. At the direction of the City Council, the owner(s) of each parcel within the District may be assessed an annual fee proportional to the benefits conferred on that parcel. Annual assessments may be increased up to a maximum amount stated in Resolution Number 91-98, adopted in 1998 by the City Council in accordance with state law requiring notice, protest, and hearing for the levy of special assessments (commonly called “Proposition 218 requirements”).

Before levying assessments in the District, the City Council must approve a report estimating the costs of proposed improvements to be made within the District and adopt a resolution stating its intention to hold a public hearing to levy assessments. The resolution of intention must state whether the City Council intends to increase assessments from the previous fiscal year.

As directed by the City Council on January 18, 2022, the City Engineer has caused to be prepared an Annual Levy Report for the Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 (“Engineer’s Report”). The Engineer’s Report generally describes existing and proposed improvements and substantial changes to be made to existing improvements within the District. The Engineer’s Report also estimates the costs of such improvements. In order to meet the costs, the Engineer recommends that the Council increase assessments from those levied in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 by an inflation rate of three percent (3%), as permitted in Resolution 91-98.

On May 3, 2022, the City Council approved the preliminary Engineer’s Report and adopted a resolution stating its intention to increase assessments and announcing that a public hearing on the proposed assessments would be held at the City Council’s regular meeting of June 21, 2022, at 6:30 p.m. The City Council’s Resolution of Intention was mailed to all property owners within the Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District.

The attached resolution approves the Engineer’s Report and orders the levy and collection of assessments in the Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2022-2023.

Page 1984 of 2511 ends

Page 3 of 3 ends

June 21, 2022
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Engineer’s Report
Attachment 3 – County Certification Letter

Page 1985 of 2511 ends

1 RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF

ASSESSMENTS IN THE HILLTOP LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

WHEREAS, the Hi lltop Landscape Maintenance District was established in 1986 to provide landscaping and lighting improvements and maintenance in an area in the northeastern portion of the City of Richmond generally adjacent to the I -80 freeway, north of the City of San Pablo, and extending west to the Richmond Country Club and north to the border with unincorporated lands within Contra Costa County; and

WHEREAS, on June 23, 1998 by Resolution No. 91 -98 the City Council of the City of Richmond approved a maximum amount o f individual maintenance assessments that may be levied by the City Council in the Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District (the “HLMD” or “District”) in future fiscal years and approved the index by which the stated maximum amount of individual assessments may be increased; and

WHEREAS, on January 18, 2022 the City Council ordered preparation of an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 regarding proposed improvements and costs of improvements for the HLMD; and

WHEREAS, the Engineer has prepared the Engineer’s Final Annual Levy Report Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District Fiscal Year 2022-2023 (“Engineer’s Report”) which describes existing and proposed improvements and substantial changes to be made to existing improvements within the HLMD, and which estimates the costs of such improvements; and

WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the Engineer’s Report on file with the City Clerk’s Office at Richmond City Hall at 450 Civic Center Plaza in the City of Richmond and determined that in order to pay the cost s of prop osed improvements for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 the City would have to increase District assessments from those levied in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 by an inflation rate of 3%, as permitted under Resolution 91-98.

WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, the City Counci l approved the preliminary Engineer’s Report on file with the City Clerk’s Office , declared its intention to levy and collect assessments in the Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2022-2023, proposed to increase District assessments from those levied in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 under the maximum amount permissible under Resolution 91-98, and further resolved to conduct a hearing on the levy of the proposed assessment at a regular meeting of the Richmond City Council to be held at 6:30 p.m. on June 21, 2022.

WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on June 21, 2022 on the proposal to increase District assessments from those levied in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 under the maximum amount permissible under Resolution 91-98,

NOW THEREFORE THE C ITY COUNCIL of the City of Richmond does hereby approve the Engineer’s Report and the increase in District assessments from those levied in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 in accordance with the Engineer’s Report and under the maximum amount permissible under Resoluti on 91-98 and does hereby approve the levy and collection of assessments in the Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2022-2023.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to record this resolution, together with Exhibit A as may be amended, with the office of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County, California.

Page 1986 of 2511 ends

2 I certify that the foregoing resolution was adopt ed by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on June 21, 2022:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

_____________________________________
Clerk of the City of Richmond

Approved:

_____________________
Mayor

Approved as to form:

_____________________
City Attorney

Page 1987 of 2511 ends

ENGINEER’S REPORT
City of Richmond
Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District
May 2022
Final Report

Page 1988 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page II

AFFIDAVIT
Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District
City of Richmond, County of Contra Costa, State of California

This Report and the enclosed descriptions, budget and assessment diagram outline the plans and specifications for the Hilltop Landscape Mai ntenance District and establishment of the proposed assessments for each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said District commencing in Fiscal Year 20 22/2023. Reference is hereby made to the Contra Costa County Assessor’s maps for a detailed descr iption of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated this ____21st_______ day of ____June__________, 2022.

SCI Consulting Group
Assessment Engineer (On Behalf of the City of Richmond)

By: ________________________________ John W. Bliss, License No. C52091

Page 1989 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page III

CERTIFICATES
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer’s Report as directed by the Richmond City Council pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution, and Section 12.60.240 of the Richmond Municipal Code. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.

Dated:____________________________, 2022

By:______________________________
Joe Leach, P.E.

Public Works Director
City of Richmond, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, including the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the _________day of_______________________, 2022.

By:__________________________
Pamela Christian, City Clerk
City of Richmond, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and conf irmed by the City Council, on the _________day of_______________________, 2022.

By:__________________________
Pamela Christian, City Clerk
City of Richmond, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, including the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Contra Costa on the _________day of_______________________, 2022.

By:__________________________
Pamela Christian, City Clerk
City of Richmond, California

Page 1990 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page IV

CITY OF RICHMOND
City Council
Tom Butt – Mayor
Eduardo Martinez - Vice Mayor
Nathaniel Bates - Councilmember
Claudia Jimenez - Councilmember
Demnlus Johnson, III - Councilmember
Gayle McLaughlin - Councilmember
Melvin Willis - Councilmember
Clerk of the Council
Pamela Christian
City Manager
Shasa Curl
Interim City Attorney
Dave Aleshire
Department of Public Works
Joe Leach, P.E., Director
Engineer of Work
SCI Consulting Group

Page 1991 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page V
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................... 7 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 7 Benefit Zones Introduction .......................................................................................... 8 Legal Analysis................................................................................................................ 8 Plans & Specifications ................................................................................... 13 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 13 Description of Improvements .................................................................................... 13 Fiscal Year 2022-23 Estimate of Cost and Budget ........................................... 17 Approach .................................................................................................................... 17 Method of Assessment Apportionment ......................................................... 20 Method of Apportionment ......................................................................................... 20 Approach .................................................................................................................... 21 Discussion of Benefit .................................................................................................. 21 Special Benefits .......................................................................................................... 23 Quantification and Separation of General Benefits ................................................... 25 Determination of Special Benefits and Assessment Within Each Zone ..................... 27 Determination of Apportionment of Special Benefit and Assessment ...................... 30 Annual Cost Indexing .................................................................................................. 36 Appeals of Assessments Levied to Property .............................................................. 36 Assessment Funds Must Be Expended Within the Improvement District Area ......... 37 Oversight, Annual Review and Accountability ........................................................... 37 Assessment ................................................................................................... 38 Assessment Diagram ..................................................................................... 40 ssessment Roll .............................................................................................. 41

Page 1992 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page VI
List of Tables
Table 1 – Projected Annual Direct Maintenance Costs .................................................... 17 Table 2 – Projected Annual Administration Costs ............................................................ 18 Table 3 – Projected Annual Repairs and Rehabilitation Costs .......................................... 18 Table 4 – Projected Annual Gateway and Signage Loan Payment Costs .......................... 18 Table 5 – Projected Annual Levy Adjustment Costs ......................................................... 19 Table 6 – Summary of Maintenance Costs Assigned to Assessment ................................ 19 Table 7 – Quantification and Separation of General Benefit ............................................ 26 Table 8 – Net Assessment to Zone 1 ................................................................................. 28 Table 9 – Net Assessment to Zone 2 ................................................................................. 29 Table 10 – Net Assessment to Zone 3 ............................................................................... 29 Table 11 – Zone 1 Costs, Special Benefit costs and Determination of Rates .................... 33 Table 12 – Zone 2 Costs, Special Benefit Costs and Determination of Rates ................... 34 Table 13 – Zone 3 Costs, Special Benefit Costs and Determination of Rates ................... 35 Table 14 – Rate Summary Table ....................................................................................... 36 Table 15 – Assessment Summary Table – Net Amount to Assessment ............................ 38 Table 16 – Hilltop LMD Assessment Diagram ................................................................... 40

Page 1993 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 7 ends

Introduction
Overview
The City of Richmond’s Hilltop Landscap e Maintenance District (“Hilltop LMD” or the "District") provide maintenance and servicing of landscaping along public streets and in easements and public right of ways immediately adjacent to and within the District , including general landscaping, street trees, play lots, recreational parks, open space, trail and wetlands) The District is located in other northern portion of Richmond, and includes commercial industrial, vacant and residential parcels in the vicinity of The Shops at Hilltop (also known as the “The Hilltop Mall”) and the Richmond County Club. The maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements are primarily associated with Hilltop Drive, Blume Drive, Hilltop Mall Road, Magazine Street, Hilltop Lake Park Open Space, Lake Drain Pumping Systems, Richmond Parkway North Open Space, San Pablo Lake Drain Pumping systems, Richmond Parkway North Open Space, San Pablo Avenue, Richmond I-80 Interchange, Industrial Park Open Space, and Atlas Drive (West).

To ensure the proper flow of funds for the ongoing operation, maintenance, and servicing of improvements that were constructed as a condition of development within various subdivisions, the City Council, through the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (19 72 Act), formed the Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District. The 1972 Act also permits the creation of benefit zones within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Therefore, because there are varying degrees of benefit within the various subdivisions, the City Council established three benefit zones.

The Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District was originally established in 1986 by the City Council and was reauthorized, based on the requirements of Proposition 218, on June 23, 1998 by Resolution No. 91-98.

Beginning in 2018-19, SCI Consulting Group assumed the role of Assessment Engineer for the Hilltop LMD. SCI conducted a parcel audit to confirm boundaries, parcels, rates , assessment and other attributes with the District, and made recommendations and minor adjustments. Also, SCI reviewed the previous Engineer’s Report made adjustments and improvements on approach and content, and drafted this document.

Page 1994 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 8 ends

Benefit Zones Introduction
The District is divided into three distinct geographic benefit zones, referred to as Zone 1, Zone 2 and Zone 3. Each benefit zone has a separate budget pertaining to its respective improvements being maintained, but share some administrative resources for the preparation of the Engineer’s Report, Council Reports, Resolutions, etc.

Zone 1
Includes: Hilltop Mall Road and adjoining streets; Blume Drive; Auto Plaza; Richmond Parkway; Hilltop Plaza; the Summit and Bay View Apartment complex; Lakeside Drive Residential Area; and the Lakeside Drive Industrial Area. This zone includes approximately 99 parcels.

Zone 2
Includes: Richmond Parkway West Residential/Commercial Area. This zone includes approximately 1,162 parcels.

Zone 3
Includes: Atlas Road Industrial Area. This zone includes approximately 22 parcels.

Legal Analysis
Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, Inc. v Santa Clara County Open Space Authority
In July of 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling on the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, Inc. v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (“SVTA vs.

SCCOSA”). This ruling is the most significant court case in further legally clarifying the substantive assessment requirements of Proposition 218 which was approved by California voters in 1996. Several of the most important elements of the ruling included further emphasis that:
▪ Benefit assessments are for special, not general, benefit ▪ The services and/or improvements funded by assessments must be clearly defined
▪ Special benefits are directly received by and provide a direct advantage to property in the Improvement District
▪ The assessment paid by property should be proportional to the special benefits it receives from the Improvements

Page 1995 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 9 ends

This Engineer’s Report and the process used to establish the continuation of the assessments for fiscal year 2022-23 are consistent with the SVTA decision and with the requirements of Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution based on the following factors:

1. The District is drawn to include the entire City; although only parcels deriving special benefits are included in the assessment rolls. Thus, zones of benefit are not required and the assessment revenue derived from real property in the District is ex pended only on the Improvements in the District.

2. The Improvements which are constructed and maintained with assessment proceeds in the District are located in close proximity to the real property subject to the assessment. The Improvements pro vide landscaping and other services to the residents of such assessed property. The proximity of the Improvements to the assessed parcels provides a special benefit to the parcel being assessed pursuant to the factors outlined by the Supreme Court in that decision.

3. Due to their proximity to the assessed parcels, the Improvements financed with assessment revenues in the District benefit the properties in that District in a manner different in kind from the benefit that other parcels of real property in the City derive from such Improvements, and the benefits conferred on such property in the District are more extensive than a general increase in property values.

4. The assessments paid in the District are proportional to the special benefit that each parcel within that Assessment District receives from the Improvements because:
a. The specific landscaping Improvements and maintenance and utility costs thereof in the District are specified in this Report; and
b. Such Improvement and maintenance costs in the District are allocated among different types of property located within the District, and equally among those properties which have similar characteristics, such as single -family residential parcels, multi-family residential parcels, commercial parcels, industrial parcels, etc.

Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property (2009) 174 Cal. App. 4 th 708 In Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property (“Dahms”) the Court upheld an assessment that was 100% special benefit (i.e. 0% general benefit) on the rationale that the services and improvements funded by the assessments were directly provided to property in the assessment district. The Court also upheld discounts and exemptions from the assessment for certain properties.

Page 1996 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 10 ends

Bonander v. Town of Tiburon (2009) 180 Cal. App. 4 th 103 Bonander v. Town of Tiburon (“Bonander”), the 1st District Court of Appeal overturned a benefit assessment approved by property owners to pay for placing overhead utility lines underground in an area of the Town of Tiburon. The Court invalidated the assessments primarily on the grounds that the assessments had been apportioned to assessed property based on the costs within sub -areas of the assessment district instead of the overall cost of the improvements and the overall proportional special benefits.

Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010) 184 Cal. App. 4 th 1516 Steven Beutz v. County of Riverside (“Beutz”) the Court overturned an assessment for park maintenance in Wildomar, California, primarily because the gen eral benefits associated with improvements and services were not explicitly calculated, quantified and separated from the special benefits.

Golden Hill Neighborhood Association v. City of San Diego (2011) 199 Cal.

App. 4 th 416
On September 22, 2011, the San Diego Court of Appeal issued a decision on the Golden Hill Neighborhood Association v. City of San Diego appeal. This decision overturned an assessment for street and landscaping maintenance in the Greater Golden Hill neighborhood of San Diego, Califo rnia. The court described two primary reasons for its decision. First, like in Beutz, the court found the general benefits associated with services were not explicitly calculated, quantified and separated from the special benefits. Second, the court found that the City had failed to record the basis for the assessment on its own parcels.

Compliance with Current Law
This Engineer’s Report is consistent with the SVTA decision and with the requirements of Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution because the Improvements to be funded are clearly defined; the benefiting property in the District enjoys close and unique proximity, access and views to the Impr ovements; the Improvements serve as an extension of usable land area for benefiting properties in the District and such special benefits provide a direct advantage to property in the District that is not enjoyed by the public at large or other property.

Page 1997 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 11 ends

This Engineer’s Report is consistent with Beutz, Dahms and Greater Golden Hill because the Improvements will directly benefit property in the District and the general benefits have been explicitly calculated and quantified and excluded from the Assessment s. The Engineer’s Report is consistent with Bonander because the Assessments have been apportioned based on the overall cost of the Improvements and Services proportional special benefit to each property, rather than the proportional cost to the District t o provide the Improvements to specific properties.

Impact of Recent Proposition 218 Decisions
This Engineer’s Report is consistent with the SVTA vs. SCCOSA, Dahms, Bonander – Beutz and Greater Golden Hill decisions and with the requirements of Article XI IIC and XIIID of the California Constitution based on the following factors:

1. The assessment revenue derived from real property in each assessment District within the City of Richmond is extended only on specific landscaping and other improvements and/or maintenance and servicing of those improvements in that assessment district

2. The use of various assessment districts ensures that the landscaping and other improvements constructed and maintained with assessment proceeds are located in close proximity to the real property subject to the assessment, and that such improvements provide a direct advantage to the property in the assessment district.

3. Due to their proximity to the assessed parcels, the improvements and maintenance thereof financed with assessment r evenues in each assessment district benefits the properties in that assessment district in a manner different in kind from the benefit that other parcels of real property in the City of Richmond derive from such improvements, and the benefits conferred on such property in each assessment district are more extensive and direct than a general increase in property values.

4. The assessments paid in each assessment district are proportional to the special benefit that each parcel within that assessment district receives from such improvements and the maintenance thereof because:
a. The specific landscaping and other improvements and maintenance and utility costs thereof in each assessment district and the costs thereof are specified in this Engineer’s Report; and

Page 1998 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 12 ends

b. Such improvement and maintenance costs in each assessment district are allocated among different types of property located within each assessment district , and equally among those properties which have similar characteristics and receive similar special benefits.

There have been a number of clarifications made to the analysis, findings and supporting text in this Report to ensure that this consistency is well communicated.

Page 1999 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 13 ends

Plans & Specifications
Introduction
As required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the annual Engineer's Report includes: (1) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced, (2) an estimated budget, and (3) a listing of the proposed assessment amount for each assessable lot or parcel.

The improvements consist of the maintenance, servicing, installation, and construction of landscaping on public streets and in easements and public right o f ways immediately adjacent to and within the District. Historically, developers of t he various properties within the District have installed most of the improvements , as a condition of development approval.

Description of Improvements
The improvements consist of the construction, operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, and servicing of landscaping, and appurtenant (pertaining to something that attaches) facilities including but not limited to; personnel, utilities such as water, materials, contractual services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services and facilities as described below, verbatim, from the existing Engineer’s Report.

1. Landscape maintenance within the right of way and medians including: watering, pruning, staking and guying, weeding, providing insect and disease control , fertilizing, repairing irrigation systems and appurtenances, and replacement of missing or dying plants and trees as budget permits in these areas:
o Street trees along both sides of Auto Plaza, Research Dr., Lakeside Dr., Shane Dr., Robert H. Miller Dr., Hillview Dr., Klose Way, Garrity Way, and Blume Dr. o Street trees along the outside edge of Hilltop Mall Road. o Street trees and landscaping in the area along the northerly side of Hilltop Dr. from the back of the curb to the adjacent property line fence. o Street trees and Landscaping in median islands in the areas along both sides of Atlas Road and Richmond Parkway from Giant Highway to I-80. o Landscaping in the Parkway Transit Center at Richmond Parkway and I-80.

Page 2000 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 14 ends

o Landscaping and the lake in Hilltop Lake Park and adjacent open space, including increased management of the lake involving drainage and watershed management.

2. Maintaining directional and entrance signs, as funds are available.

3. Providing at least one person with vehicle and equipment for general cleanup and litter control.

4. Eliminating graffiti from all public sound walls, retaining walls, signs, equipment cabinets and appurtenances, and other facilities within public property and rights-ofway.

5. Maintaining the public sound walls along San Pablo Ave. from Richmond Parkway to Hilltop Dr. and along the north side of Richmond Parkway from I-80 to Giant Highway.

6. Maintaining existing and future sculptures within the District.

The specific maintenance services to be performed are directed by the City of Richmond Parks & Landscaping Superintendent as Administrator for the District. T he improvements, are generally shown on the planting and irrigation plans for the Atlas Road West, Atlas Road & Blume Drive Extension, Richmond Parkway between Giant Highway and San Pab lo Avenue. The improvements in Zone 2 are generally shown on the Residential Development plans. These plans are available for inspection in the office of the City Engineer and have been incorporated into this report by reference.

The maintenance, operation, and servicing of District improvements is contingent on the availability of funding and, as directed by the City of Richmond Public Works Director and the Hilltop District Homeowners & St akeholders Association (the "Association") (www.hdhsa.com), generally includes (i) the regular scheduled maintenance, and (ii) the repair and rehabilitation, replacement of damaged equipment, as well as the repair or renovation of facilities associated with the District.

The Association is also the advisory committee established to review services in the District, in order to (i) provide the District's Administrator with input on funded Improvements, facility replacements, and rehabilitations, (ii) identify areas in the District that may need additional attention, and (iii) provide recommendations on priority of Improvements based on the available District revenues above and beyond the regular operations and maintenance budget. Importantly, Committee members are not precluded from assuming roles in a Hilltop Business Association or other similar non-profit organization, or to facilitate erection of pylon monument displays or other promotional activities that may be beneficial to the District, the City, and Hilltop business community.

Commencing in FY 2015-2016, the Association has made these requests to the City:

Page 2001 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 15 ends

1. Any maintenance of District Improvements, especially those Improvements that provide 100% special benefit to the propert y owners in the District, will proceed uninterrupted by changes in the City's General Fund that would cause periodic hiring freezes and budget cuts;

2. The City will (i) track any District resources (funded through t he assessment) utilized by the City for non-District purposes, and (ii) create a special budget line item to capture any repayments of assessment funds to the District;

3. The City will provide a cost breakdown, year-to-date budget, and payroll report monthly;

4. The City will create a budget for all expenses in the District, and the budget will explain specific purchases and the associated cost of such purchases.

Conceptual Improvement Plan

Page 2002 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 16 ends

Special Note on the Hilltop Drive sound wall (added in 2020-21) Within the Boundaries of the Hilltop LMAD, there is an existing sound wall which runs along the property line on the south side of Hilltop Drive stretching from Moyers Drive westward to Robert Miller Drive. There is a gap at Shane Drive. The portion of the sound wall between Moyers Drive and where the wall is set back between the West County Wastewater District building and residential parcel along McKenzie Drive (approx. 600’ from Robert Miller Drive) is maintained by a combined effort of private owners, the City of Richmond, and LMAD. The routine maintenance on the south side of the wall is the responsibility of the individual residential property owners. The routine maintenance on the north side of the wall has been the responsibility of the LMAD. Any catastrophic failures or issues have been the responsibility of the City of Richmond. In the future, non- routine issues will be evaluated on case-by-case basis and will be the responsibility of the appropriate party or parties.

A typical cross section for m ajor thoroughfares within the Hilltop District indicating maintenance and operation responsibilities is shown below.

Typical Cross Section

Page 2003 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 17 ends

Fiscal Year 20 22-23 Estimate of Cost and Budget
Approach
Overall costs for the annual maintenance and servicing of the District estimated each year as the eligible special benefit portion of the sum of costs from:
• Direct Maintenance
• Annual Administration
• Repairs and Rehabilitation
• Gateway and Signage Loans
• Levy Adjustments
The City has established a special fund for the revenues and expenditures of the District.

Except for when funds are being accumulated for future capital improvements and operating reserves, any balance remaining as of July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

Each of these annual cost com ponents are summarized in detail in tables 1 through 5, below, and are summarized in Table 6.

The table below details the projected annual direct maintenance costs including salaries and benefits, utilities, equipment rentals, materials and miscellaneous supplies.

Table 1 – Projected Annual Direct Maintenance Costs
Item Description Zone 1
Cost
Estimate
Zone 2
Cost
Estimate
Zone 3
Cost
Estimate
Total
Maintainence
Cost
Direct Maintainence
(incl. Operating Expenses)
$226,795 $37,814 $43,914 $308,523
Utilities Charges $37,007 $45,303 $5,690 $88,000
Equipment Rentals $2,963 $3,586 $451 $7,000
Park Materials &
Miscellaneous
$26,804 $32,773 $4,115 $63,691
Total1 $293,569 $119,476 $54,170 $467,214
Less adjustment towards general benefit 2 ($10,510) ($4,799) ($1,217) Total Amount to Assessment (in Table 15) 3 $283,059 $114,676 $52,953 $450,688

Note:

1.) The total Annual Direct Maintenance Costs

Page 2004 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 18 ends

2.) Adjustment contribution for this fiscal year made by City to balance actual staffing costs shortfall. This contribution is eligible to pay for general benefits

3.) Actual adjusted staffing costs charged to assessment The table below details the projected annual administration costs including professional services, city and county administration costs, and corporate yard fees.

Table 2 – Projected Annual Administration Costs
Item Description Zone 1
Cost
Estimate
Zone 2
Cost
Estimate
Zone 3
Cost
Estimate
Total
Administration
Cost
Professional Services $3,360 $40,934 $706 $45,000
City Administration $47,103 $24,404 $7,804 $79,311
County Administration $535 $655 $82 $1,272
Corporate Yard Leasing Fee $5,623 $6,243 $865 $12,731
Total $56,621 $72,236 $9,457 $138,314

The table below details the projected annual repair and rehabilitation costs.

Table 3 – Projected Annual Repairs and Rehabilitation Costs Item Description Zone 1
Cost
Estimate
Zone 2
Cost
Estimate
Zone 3
Cost
Estimate
Total Repairs and
Rehabilitation
Cost
Equipment and
Contract Services 4,380$ 5,332$ 669$ 10,381$ Total 4,380$ 5,332$ 669$ 10,381$

The table below details the projected annual gateway and signage loan payment costs including both principal and interest.

Table 4 – Projected Annual Gateway and Signage Loan Payment Costs Item Description Zone 1
Cost
Estimate
Zone 2
Cost
Estimate
Zone 3
Cost
Estimate
Total
Loan Payment
Wayfinding Signage - Loan
Payment
(Paid off: June 30, 2019) $0 $0 $0 $0
Directional Signs $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $0

Page 2005 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 19 ends

Table 5 below details the projected annual adjustments including the cost allocation pool and the City’s contribution. Annual City Support (beyo nd requirements to meet general benefit contributions) may be reduced in future years as capital reserves are replenished and revenue more closely covers costs.

Table 5 – Projected Annual Levy Adjustment Costs
Item Description Zone 1
Cost
Estimate
Zone 2
Cost
Estimate
Zone 3
Cost
Estimate
Total
Levy Adjustment*
Cost Allocation Pool $303,553 $371,379 $46,638 $721,570 Additional City Support
(General Fund) ($171,442) ($22,602) ($35,071) ($229,115) Total* $132,111 $348,777 $11,567 $492,455

Table 6 below details the projected annual administration costs including professional services, city and county administration costs, and corporate yard fees to be charge to assessment.

Table 6 – Summary of Maintenance Costs Assigned to Assessment Description - All Zones
Data
Source Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Total
Annual Direct Maintenance Cost Table 1 $283,059 $114,676 $52,953 $450,688 Annual Administration Cost Table 2 $56,621 $72,236 $9,457 $138,314 Annual Repair & Rehabilitation Table 3 $4,380 $5,332 $669 $10,381 Gateway and Signage Table 4 $0 $0 $0 $0
Annual Levy Adjustments Table 5 $303,553 $371,379 $46,638 $721,570 Additional City Support (General Fund) Table 5 ($171,442) ($22,602) ($35,071) ($229,115) Total $476,170 $541,022 $74,646 $1,091,838
Total Cost

Page 2006 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 20 ends

Method of Assessment Apportionment
Method of Apportionment
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and street lighting improvements.

Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value.

This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." Proposition 218 also requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property.

Because assessments are lev ied on the basis of benefit, they are not considered a tax, and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.

The 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways.

Page 2007 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 21 ends

Approach
The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the proportional special benefits conferred to the properties over and above the general benefits conferred to real property in the District or to the public at large. Special benefit and the Assessments are calculated for each parcel in the District using the following process:

1. Identification of special benefit factors derived from the Improvements

2. Quantification and Separation of the general benefits

3. Determination of the relative special benefit within different areas within the District

4. Determination of the relative special benefit per property type

5. Apportionment of the costs to Assessment and calculation of the Assessment for each individual parcel based upon special benefit; location, property type, property size, property characteristics, improvements on property and other supporting attributes.

Discussion of Benefit
Assessments can only be levied based on the special benefit to property. This special benefit is received by property over and above any general benefits. Any and all general benefit must be funded from another so urce. With reference to the requirements for assessments, Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 states:

The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.

The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California].

Proposition 218, as codified in Article XIIID of the California Constitution, states that assessments must be based on the special benefit to property and that, No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.

Since assessments are levied on the basis of special benefit, they are not a tax and are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.

Page 2008 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 22 ends

The following benefit categories summarize the types of special benefit to residential, commercial, industrial and other lots and parcels resulting from the Improvements to be provided with the assessment proceeds. These types of special benefit are summarized as follows:

A. Proximity to Improved Landscaped Areas and Other Public Improvements within the District.

B. Access to Improved landscaped areas and Other Public Improvements within the District.

C. Improved Views within the District.

D. Extension of a property’s outdoor areas and green spaces for properties within close proximity to the Improvements.

E. Creation of individual lots for residential and commercial use that, in absence of the Assessments, would not have been created.

In this case, the recent SVTA v. SCCOSA decision provides enhanced clarity to the definitions of special benefits to properties from similar improvements in three distinct areas:
▪ Proximity
▪ Expanded or improved access
▪ Views
The SVTA v. SCCOSA decision also clarifies that a special benefit is a service or improvement that provides a direct advantage to a parcel and that indirect or derivative advantages resulting from the overall public benefits from a service or improvement are general benefits. The SVTA v. SCCOSA decision also provides specific guidance that park improvements are a direct advantage and special benefit to property that is proximate to a park that is improved by an assessment:

The characterization of a benefit may depend on whether the parcel receives a direct advantage from the improvement (e.g. proximity to a park) or receives an indirect, derivative advantage resulting from the overall public benefits of the improvement (e.g. general enhancement of the district’s property values).

Proximity, improved access and views, in addition to the other special benefits listed herein further strengthen the basis of these assessments.

Page 2009 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 23 ends

Moreover, the Dahms decision further clarified that c ertain services and improvements funded by assessments, that are over and above what otherwise would be provided and that other property in general and the public do not share or receive are 100% special benefit. The assessment -funded services upheld by Da hms included streetscape maintenance and security services.

Special Benefit s
The special benefits from the Improvements are further detailed below:

Proximity to I mproved Landscaped Areas within the District Only the specific properties within close proxi mity to the Improvements are included in the District. The District has been narrowly drawn to include the properties that receive special benefits from the Improvements. Therefore, property in the District enjoys unique and valuable proximity and access to the Improvements that the public at large and property outside the District do not share.

In absence of the Assessments, the Improvements would not be provided and the public improvements funded in the District would be degraded due to insufficient f unding for maintenance, upkeep and repair. Therefore, the Assessments provide Improvements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided. Improvements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided do not by themselves translate into special benefits but when combined with the unique proximity and access enjoyed by parcels in the District, they provide a direct advantage and special benefit to property in the District.

Access to Improved Landscaped Areas within the District Since the parcels in the District are nearly the only parcels that enjoy close access to the Improvements, they directly benefit from the unique close access to improved landscaping areas and other public improvements that are provided by the Assessments.

This is a direct advantage and special benefit to property in the District.

Page 2010 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 24 ends

Improved Views within the Assessment Districts
The City, by maintaining permanent public improvements funded by the Assessments in the District, provides improved views to properties in the District. The properties in the District enjoy close and unique proximity, access and views of the specific Improvements funded in the District ; therefore, the improved and protected views provided by the Assessments are another direct and tangible advantage that is uniquely conferred upon property in the District.

Extension of a Property’s Outdoor Areas and Green Spaces for Properties within Close Proximity to the Improvements
In large part because it is cost prohibitive to provide large open land areas on property in the District, the residential, commercial and other benefiting properties in the District do not have large outdoor areas and green spaces. The Improvements within the District provide additional outdoor areas that serve as an effective extension of the land area for proximate properties because the Improvements are uniquely proximate and accessible to property in close proximity to the Improvements. The Improvemen ts, therefore, provide an important, valuable and desirable extension of usable land area for the direct advantage and special benefit of properties in the District because such properties have uniquely good and close proximity to the Improvements.

Creatio n of I ndividual Lots for Residential and Commercial Use that, in Absence of the As sessments, Would Not Have Been C reated In most of the District, the original owner/developer(s) of the property within the District agreed unanimously to the Assessments. The Assessments provide the necessary funding for public improvements that were required as a condition of development and subdivision approval. Therefore, such Assessments allowed the original property to be subdivided and for development of the parcels to occur. As parcels were sold, new owners were informed of the Assessments through the title reports, and in some cases, through Department of Real Estate “White Paper” reports that the parcels were subject to assessment. Purchase of proper ty was also an “agreement” to pay the Assessment.

Therefore, in absence of the Assessments, the lots within most of the District would not have been created. These parcels, and the improvements that were constructed on the parcels, receive direct advantage and special benefit from the Assessments.

Page 2011 of 2511 ends

City of Richmond
Hilltop LMD
Final Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 25 ends

Quantification and Separation of General Benefit s
Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution requires any local agency proposing to increase or impose a benefit assessment to “separate the gener al benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.” The rationale for separating special and general benefits is to ensure that property owners subject to the benefit assessment are not paying for general benefits. Property may be assessed to fun d improvements to the extent of the special benefits conferred by the Improvements; but general benefits are not assessable. Accordingly, a separate estimate of the special and general benefit is given in this section.

Article XIIID never defines the term “general benefit.” The definition of special benefit in Section 2(i) includes the statement that general enhancement of property value does not constitute special benefit. SVTA expands somewhat on this idea by stating that general benefit may be describe d as “an indirect, derivative advantage” resulting from the improvements. One infers from Article XIIID that all benefit is either general or special.

In other words, there is no widely -accepted or statutory formula for quantifying the amount of any general benefit that is identified.

In this Report, SCI has reviewed and confirmed the reasonableness of the existing approach and calculations for general benefit, which is described, verbatim, below:

Proposition 218 critically notes that "an agency shall se parate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred..."
While it has been determined that (i) various District Improvements are clearly local amenities directly associated with the development of the properties within the District and (ii) these Improvements are more extensive and are provided at an enhanced level of service that is notably higher than that typically provided by the City, it is also recognized that some of the Improvements do benefit the traveling public and would likely have minimal impact on the commercial and residential areas in the District (i.e. provide a general benefit). As a result, the cost to maintain these specific Improvements has been offset by a City contribution. Importantly, the following is a discussio n of general benefit related to District Improvements that was developed and approved at the time the District was formed.

Zone 1,Hilltop Drive,I-80 Interchange to San Pablo Avenue:

Property located outside the District, that fronts the south side of Hillt op Drive directly benefits from the improvement as well as the "drive through" traffic. As a result, 33% of the estimated cost to maintain the south frontage is deemed to be general benefit and is therefore not assessed on property in the District.

Page 2012 of 2511 ends

Richmond City CouncilJune 21, 2022

Richmond City Council
June 21, 2022