Cities Index.
Agenda

Richmond City Council
November 19, 2024

Document
Agenda
Meeting
November 19, 2024
Body
Richmond City Council
Pages
173
Original file
481.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-richmond.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1313
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 17 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1314
Client: Peralta Community College District
Location: Berkeley City College, Berkeley, CA
Industry: Higher Education
Date of Loss: June 28, 2023
Type of Loss: Structure and contents mitigation
Total Cost: $8,465
Contact Name & Title: Jeremy Bordi, Senior Project Manager Contact Info: [email protected] – (415) 716-8962
Background: Peralta Community College acquired a 25,374 SF, three story building for Berkeley City College use, located on a major intersection in downtown Berkeley. The neighborhood is heavily populated with the unhoused population and as the building had been unoccupied for some time, many sought refuges within.

Loss Description: Sharjo, LLC dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services was brought in to do the interior cleaning of the building. Although the windows and doors had been boarded up, it soon became an interior encampment. There were needles and drug paraphernalia, human and bio waste, rotten food and trash scattered throughout the structure. We were called in to provide abatement and cleaning services which included removal of all the trash, biohazard waste and graffiti, sterilization and to get the building safe for demolition and construction.

Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 18 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1315
What made this job unique or challenging:
• This project involved the coordination of multiple agencies and stakeholders prior, during and after the encampment abatement. The City of Berkeley Police Department conducted the initial site clearance as well as periodic on-site support. Berkeley City College Campus Security was present securing the site throughout the project. Kitchell Corporation, the general contractor doing the demolition and construction, was involved in establishing the scope of work. Peralta Community College District and Berkeley City College owned and operated the facility. Clear communication was needed to keep all parties informed of project timelines, immediate issues, and any other pertinent information.
• The building location provided additional challenges. It is located on a high traffic intersection in downtown Berkeley that is heavily populated with unhoused people. The ground floor’s windows and doors were boarded up and had to remain boarded up throughout the abatement process.

The main door was opened in the morning to let our crews in and then closed behind us. In order to exit, our crews had a radio to communicate with the campus security that was stationed outside the main door, requesting that they remove the barriers. • Although there was electricity, there were very few working overhead lights. An unoccupied building is a haven for a particular sector of the unhoused population. Not only does it protect them from the elements and provide a much more comfortable living environment, more importantly it provides an 'out of public sight' environment that quickly becomes a 'shoot house', especially if there is power. In order to avoid detection, the facility’s lights are dismantled or broken so they won’t be used and seen from outside. Without overhead lights and boarded up windows, portable lights and headlights were used to illuminate the environment. • Security protocol required both the facility and the 40-yard debris box to be secure. Trash and debris needed to be compiled in a designated area within the building and disposed of in mass.

When we were ready to dispose of the trash and debris, the Campus Security team would open up the boarded door, and the City of Berkeley Police Department would secure the area containing the debris box so it would not be accessed by the general population.

Describe the resources used: Four technicians, PPE, portable lights and headlamps, bio disposal containers, shovels, racks, debris removal equipment, 40-yard debris box How long did it take to complete the job: One day
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 19 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1316
Additional sites
Contra Costa County – Marsh Creek
In preparation for the rainy season, we cleaned
and removed multiple encampments and illegal
dumping locations on both sides of March Creek
spaced out over a mile from end-to-end. Since
these encampments were located in the flood
channel, we had to perform all
work by hand. All debris was pulled out of the
flood channel and disposed of in accordance with
all applicable laws.
• Total Tonnage Removed – 104
• Contract Amount - $250,000
• Equipment Used – No heavy equipment, 40-
yard roll-off bins were dropped as close as
possible.
• Small tools used: rakes, shovels, needle
grabbers, garbage cans and wheelbarrows.
• We provided the labor force of six technicians
and one supervisor for 15 days.

City of Antioch
• We removed 500 yards of high-density
encampments and biohazardous waste
• 50+ unhoused occupied the land alongside the
railroad tracks. In some locations, the debris
piles were up to five feet.
• Total Tonnage Removed – 31
• Contract Amount – $89,500
• Equipment used – Bobcat with bucket and
grapple claw attachments, 40-yard roll-off bins
• Small tools used - rakes, shovels, needle
grabbers, garbage cans and wheelbarrows.
• We provided the labor force of six technicians
and one supervisor for five days to complete
this job.
***More examples available upon request***
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 20 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1317
c) Cleaning Processes and Techniques
Purpose: The Biohazardous Cleaning Protocol is designed to help employees understand the hazards and follow the safety rules associated with biohazards. This program contains the following:
• Hazard Identification
• Establishing the Scope of Loss
The company will follow our Bloodborne Pathogen Exposure Plan and treat all blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) as infectious waste and will use universal precautions while remediating trauma losses. As a result, all human blood and body fluids are treated as if they are known to be infectious for HBV, HIV and other bloodborne pathogens. In circumstances where it is difficult or impossible to differentiate between body fluid types, all bodily fluids are assumed to be potentially infectious.

Identifying Hazards:

Hazard Description
Bloodborne Pathogens • Bloodborne pathogens include but are not limited to Hepatitis B and C, AIDs and HIV. These are found in infected blood or bodily fluids
• This operation uses "Universal Precautions." As a result, all human blood and body fluids are treated as if they are known to be infectious for HBV, HIV and other bloodborne
pathogens
Needles or other sharp
material
• Needles or other sharp material have been commonplace for these encampments
• May be contaminated with Bloodborne Pathogens or other OPIM
Weapons • Guns
• Knives
• Any object fashioned in a manner that would cause harm to another
Hazardous Material Four Characteristics of Hazardous Waste:
• Ignitability: Flash point less than 60°C/140°F Ex - Used solvents, propane
• Corrosivity: Strong acids or bases, or that produce acid or alkaline solutions. A liquid waste may be corrosive if it is able to corrode metal containers. Ex- Acid from a lead acid battery
• Reactivity: Are unstable under normal conditions. Can cause explosions or release toxic fumes, gases, or vapors when heated, compressed or mixed with water. Ex - Lithium - Sulfur Batteries, unused explosives
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 21 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1318
• Toxicity: Toxic wastes are harmful or fatal if ingested or absorbed EX - material containing lead or asbestos
Drug or Drug
Paraphernalia
• Would include medically prescribed or illicit drugs
• In most cases, proper authorities should be called
o Exception: Marijuana destruction will be handled by the company when presented with court order to do so
Establish the Scope:

To create the scope of loss the following considerations will reviewed at the loss site to determine scope of work:

Prepare and Protect Personnel

1. Full PPE will be worn:
a. Full face respirator (safety glass rated face shield) with organic filter; must be decontaminated after use
b. Double glove
i. Inside layer: nitrile
ii. Outer layer: rubber gloves

1. If sharps are suspected on site, the outer glove layer will be replaced with puncture resistant gloves to protect from exposure. Must be decontaminated after use.

2. Demo gloves may replace the outer rubber glove layer if building materials need to be removed. Must be decontaminated after use. c. Disposal coveralls with hood and boots rated to work with bloodborne pathogen

2. If building material will be removed in the process of remediation:
a. Knee pads. If worn outside of coveralls, must be decontaminated after use

3. The following Engineering Controls are used throughout the company:
a. Hand washing facilities (or antiseptic hand cleansers and towels or antiseptic towelettes), which are readily accessible to all employees who have the potential for exposure.

Prepare and
Protect
Personnel
Isolate & Protect
Contaminated
Zone
Inspect from
Source Out Test Surfaces
Clean, Bag, and
Disinfect
Deodorize Quality Control
Decontaminate
Equipment &
Self
Contact
Disposal
Company
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 22 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1319
i. Employees will wash hands or any other skin with soap and water, or flush mucous membranes with water immediately or as soon as feasible following contact of such body areas with blood or other potentially infectious materials.
ii. Employees will wash their hands immediately or as soon as feasible after removal of gloves or other personal protective equipment. When antiseptic hand cleaners or towelettes are used, hands will be washed with soap and running water as soon as feasible. Do not reuse gloves. b. Containers for contaminated materials including sharps having the following characteristics:
i. Puncture resistant.
ii. Color-coded or labeled with a Biohazard Warning Label. iii. Leak proof on the sides and bottom.
iv. Secondary containers which are:

1. Leak proof.

2. Color-coded or labeled with a Biohazard Warning Label.

3. Puncture resistant.

4. The company has adopted the following Work Practice Controls as part of our Bloodborne Pathogens Compliance Program:
a. Employees wash their hands with soap and water immediately or as soon as possible, after removal of potentially contaminated gloves or personal protective equipment.
b. Following any contact of body areas with blood or any other infectious materials, employees wash their hands and any other exposed skin with soap and water immediately or as soon as possible. They also flush exposed mucous membranes with water.
c. Eating, drinking, smoking, applying cosmetics or lip balm and handling contact lenses is prohibited in work areas where there is potential exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
d. Materials containing blood or other materials are placed in designated leak-proof containers, appropriately labeled, for handling and storage. e. If outside contamination of a primary container occurs, that container is placed within a second leak-proof container, appropriately labeled, for handling and storage. (If the specimen can puncture the primary container, the secondary container must be puncture resistant as well).
f. Equipment which becomes contaminated, is examined prior to servicing or shipping, and decontaminated as necessary (unless it can be demonstrated that decontamination is not feasible).
i. An appropriate Biohazard Warning Label is attached to any contaminated equipment, identifying the contaminated portions.
g. When a new employee is hired or an employee’s job changes, the following process takes place to ensure that they are trained in the appropriate Work Practice Controls:

Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 23 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1320
i. The employee's tasks and procedures are checked against Task Lists, identified in the Exposure Control Plan as those in which occupational exposure occurs.
ii. If the employee is transferring from one job to another within our operation, the job tasks/procedures pertaining to their previous position are also checked against these lists.

Isolate & Protect Contaminated Zone

1. Place “BioHazard” signs to warn others of the contamination

2. Set containment to provide:
a. Protection from Contaminated Zone
i. PPE required
b. Clean Staging Area
i. PPE donning and doffing
ii. Equipment decontamination
c. Support Zone
i. PPE not required, but anything in this zone must be decontaminated first if travelling from Contaminated Zone.

Inspect from Source Out

1. Start where the victim or deceased was

2. Main body removal must be completed prior to work beginning a. Does not include brain matter
b. Proper handling agencies should have already been on site to remove

3. Review all building materials and contents for damage

4. Create scope for crew following the Remediation Protocol Remediation Protocol

1. Clean, Bag, and Disinfect
a. Anything salvageable, pack and take out for cleaning b. Non-salvageable items:
i. Containers that meet Bloodborne Pathogen Exposure Plan ii. Containers should not to exceed 40lbs
iii. Containers are closed, sealed with red biomed tape and labeled c. The following procedures are used with all of types of Blood or OPIM wastes:
i. They are discarded or "bagged" in containers that are:

1. Closeable.

2. Puncture resistant if the discarded materials have the potential to penetrate the container.

3. Leak proof if the potential for fluid spill or leakage exists.

4. Red in color or labeled with the appropriate Biohazard Warning Label. ii. Waste will be:

Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 24 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1321

1. Waste containers are maintained upright, routinely replaced and not allowed to overfill.

2. Whenever our employees move containers of regulated waste from one area to another the containers are immediately closed and placed inside an appropriate secondary container if leakage is possible from the first container.

General Cleaning Process- In most cases non-porous materials can be cleaned and sanitized.

Porous materials cannot be cleaned and sanitized to a standard which does not create a health hazard. Below outlines the cleaning process for the overall jobsite and specific materials.

2. Disinfect contaminated surfaces before starting, allow for dwell time

3. Remove gross material
a. Start with largest areas first
b. Soak up blood or other OPIM
c. Place in appropriate biohazard container

4. Wash completely
a. Vertical surfaces start from top and finish at the bottom b. Horizontal surfaces start from source and work outward

5. Rinse thoroughly

6. Disinfect and allow for dwell time

7. Dispose of materials
a. In proper bins in accordance with the company’s Bloodborne Pathogen exposure plan

8. Building Materials
a. Drywall
i. Ceiling

1. Work top to bottom while cleaning

2. Removal may be necessary if penetrated
ii. Walls

1. Salvageability depends on paint type used
a. Some may be scrubbed with soft bristles or sponge pads b. Spray with disinfectant and wiped until contamination removed
c. Work from top to bottom
i. If floor is unaffected, use floor protection to reduce cross-contamination
d. Rinse
e. Disinfect with proper dwell time
b. Ceramic Tile
i. Asbestos concerns
ii. Most cases can be cleaned due to non-porous
iii. Clean grout
c. Acoustic Tile
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 25 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1322
i. Asbestos concerns
ii. Remove
iii. Clean grid
d. Wood
i. Floors

1. If floors are sealed, they generally can be cleaned and sanitized

2. If floors are unsealed or has a poor seal most likely it will be unsalvageable
a. If blood or OPIM has travelled into the seams, floor must be removed

3. Check boards, seams and under molding or baseboards

4. Clean and disinfect sealed floors
a. Start at source, clean outward
b. Spray with disinfectant
c. Remove gross material
d. Clean area
e. Rinse area
f. Disinfectant area allowing for dwell time
ii. Cabinets

1. If cabinets are sealed or painted, they generally can be cleaned and sanitized

2. If cabinets are unsealed or have a poor seal most likely it will be unsalvageable
a. If blood or OPIM has travelled into the seams, floor must be removed

3. Check boards, seams and under molding or baseboards

4. Clean and disinfect sealed wood
a. Clean starting from the top to the bottom
b. Spray with disinfectant
c. Remove gross material
d. Clean area
e. Rinse area
f. Disinfectant area allowing for dwell time
iii. Painted wood

1. Spray with cleaner

2. Scrape off big pieces (plastic scrapers will reduce scratches) iv. Open joists

1. Spray with cleaner

2. Scrape

3. Spray with disinfectant
e. Glass
i. Start at source, clean outward
ii. Spray with disinfectant
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 26 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1323
iii. Remove gross material
iv. Clean area
v. Rinse area
vi. Disinfectant area allowing for dwell time
f. Carpet & Pad
i. Fibers will usually wick quickly so generally unsalvageable once stained ii. Cut out affected area and dispose

1. Blood and OPIM can travel therefore check the underside of the carpet to estimate the size of the stain

2. Stain will usually be larger on the underside of the carpet

3. Cut into small pieces then put into biohazard bins
g. Concrete
i. Disinfect, allow for dwell time
ii. Remove gross contaminates

1. May need run-off barriers to protect outside area or storm drains iii. Apply cleaner and scrub
iv. Catch all run off-do not drain in storm drains

1. Absorb with towel then dispose with other biohazard material

2. Absorbent material that can be swept up or HEPA vac then dispose with other biohazard material
v. Hydrogen peroxide or bleach for remaining stains
vi. May need to be repainted or sealed
vii. Same process for indoor (like garages) or outdoor (parking lots) h. Vinyl
i. Asbestos concerns
ii. If in good condition, may be cleaned and sanitized
iii. If in poor condition (cracked, cuts, anything that would make blood or OPIM leak to subfloor) most likely it will be unsalvageable

1. If blood or OPIM has travelled into the seams, vinyl must be removed iv. Check boards, seams and under molding or baseboards v. Clean and disinfect sealed floors

1. Start at source, clean outward

2. Spray with disinfectant

3. Remove gross material

4. Clean area

5. Rinse area

6. Disinfectant area allowing for dwell time
i. Other
i. Fixtures (lights, light switches, outlets, plugs, air conditioner, etc)

1. Use general cleaning process

2. If stained, dispose of with other biohazardous material ii. Bathtubs

1. Sometimes the source
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 27 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1324

2. Generally ok to dispose of blood down the drain
a. Need to check if septic tanks are involved

3. Gross material should not go down drains
a. Catch then dispose of with other biohazard waste

4. Depending on the condition of the tub prior to damage, may be stained and not salvageable

5. Follow general cleaning process

9. Contents
a. Appliances
i. Use general cleaning process

1. Open all lids and compartments
ii. If stained, dispose of with other biohazardous material b. Computers
i. Mostly can be saved but may be needed if investigation is in progress c. Soft Goods
i. Cannot be certified as disinfected
ii. Non-salvageable
iii. If jobsite contact, family or others insist on keeping, sign release d. Upholstery
i. Generally unsalvageable once stained
ii. Cut out contamination

1. Contaminated pieces in proper biohazard bins

2. Non-contaminated pieces in regular trash
e. Mattress and Box Springs
i. Generally unsalvageable once stained
ii. Cut out contamination

1. Contaminated pieces in proper biohazard bins

2. Non-contaminated pieces in regular trash
f. Wood furniture
i. Sealed variety can usually be cleaned
ii. Open all doors and cabinets, blood and OPIM can travel iii. Clean from top to the bottom
iv. Rinse and disinfect
Deodorize- After following the general cleaning guidelines (removing the source of the odor)

1. Counteract with masking agent

2. Ventilate the area

3. Absorb the odor through the use of hydroxyl

4. Encapsulate the odor with sealer which will block odor from returning Decontaminate- Once complete, tools, equipment and workers need to be decontaminated.

Tools and Equipment:

1. Before exiting the Clean Staging Area all tools will be cleaned and disinfected Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 28 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1325

2. Decontaminated equipment may be passed through to support zone Decontaminate Self:

1. Doff disposal PPE into appropriate biohazardous bins

2. Decontaminate re-usable PPE (respirator, work gloves, knee pads, etc.) Personal Protection Equipment (PPE)
Used to prevent exposure to blood borne pathogens, West Nile Virus, histoplasmosis, hanta virus, heat stroke and poison oak. Include, but not limited to:
• Tyvek suit with hood and booties
• Proper footwear under the Tyvek suits
• Full face respirator
o Exception: If the work is conducted outside, N95 and safety glasses may be worn instead of full-face. The employee may choose this option due to heat consideration, otherwise they can still wear a full face. • Nitrile gloves (first layer)
• Cut resistant leather gloves (second layer)
• Needle grabbers
• Sharps containers
• At hire: Each employee is issued a PPE bag. This includes work gloves, nitrile gloves, hard hat, respirator mask, ear plugs, eye protection (safety glasses and goggles), N95 masks and 3 different types of Tyvek suits.
• Daily, employees are expected to bring their PPE bag with them every day on every job.

The PPE bag does not limit the employees in taking additional PPE with them as the work scope requires. The PPE bag is a backup, all employees may get as much PPE as necessary to complete the work scope in the safest manner possible. • Steal toe boots- if a jobsite requires the use of heavy equipment. • Hard hats- if a jobsite requires the use of heavy equipment, or if work is happening above them where there is the possibility of something falling on them. • Safety vest
• Fall arrest system- when working near a drop off or on a steep embankment • Confined Space Entry
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 29 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1326
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520
d) References
Company Name: Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff Address: 1000 Ward St.

City, State, Zip: Martinez, CA, 94553
Contact Person: Lauren Brown
Phone Number: 925-655-0000
Email: [email protected]
Services Provided: Started working with Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff during the COVID-19 Pandemic. We provided both preventative cleanings and confirmed/suspected decontamination cleaning services. These services were performed at West County Detention Facility, Martinez Detention Facility, Marsh Creek Detention Facility, County Jail, Coroner's Division, Forensic Services Division and offices staffed by Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff.

From there we provided deep cleaning services, water extraction and restoration caused by intentional inmate flooding and biohazardous cleaning services. We have successfully cleaned and removed blood, vomit and other bodily waste including fecal matter and urine from the inmate’s detention cells, common areas, transfer stations and patrol vehicles.

Company Name: Contra Costa Water District
Address: 1331 Concord Ave.

City, State, Zip: Concord, CA, 94520
Contact Person: Greg Buncab
Phone Number: 925-688-8023
Email: [email protected]
Services Provided: We provide a variety of biohazardous cleaning and removal services, as well as full scale homeless encampment abatement services. The majority of the biohazardous cleanings have been human waste from homeless and have been in everything from clear buckets, so disgusted/unsuspecting containers. When the Canal Patrol Officers come across any biohazards, they notify us to assist with the cleaning. Most of the locations where this was discovered are along their many miles of canals. So, we worked very closely with them to allow access, open and closed gates and the Canal Officer’s provide security as needed.

We also partner with them and the City of Antioch to conduct inter-agency encampment abatement services. They have multiple locations where jurisdictional lines are drawn with a chain link fence where one side is Conta Costa Water District, and the other is the City of Antioch. ServiceMaster has a contract with both agencies and after learning of these specific hot spots recommended posting notices to vacate be done at the same time as an attempt to mitigate the chances the people won’t jump cross under/over and through the fence to the other agencies side and then come right back when the work is done.

ServiceMaster obtained permission from both agencies to notify the other agency when a planned abatement project is scheduled. We have already seen in a short period; the size and

Page 30 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1327
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520
severity of these hot spots have not grown as quickly as in the past. Inter-agency communication is one of ServiceMaster's strong skill sets and we are happy to put it to good use!
Company Name: City of Novato
Address: 922 Machin Ave.

City, State, Zip: Novato, CA, 94945
Contact Person: Lyle Waite
Phone Number: 415-858-8819
Email: [email protected]
Services Provided: Since 2021, ServiceMaster has been providing routine 2X’s a week cleaning at the city’s temporary “open air shelter”. This has been a very interesting approach by a city to try and minimize the encampments throughout the city. They provide a designated safe area where the people can bring their belongings in to safely sleep/live.

They contract ServiceMaster to clean 2X’s a week the common areas, protopodites, eating area and surrounding zones on the other side of the wooden fence where trash/debris/biohazards are discarded. We also provide emergency services for anything biohazardous and human waste is found on an as needed basis. The majority of the biohazardous waste is fecal matter and urine being discarded in the wrong area, as well as drug paraphernalia.

This is another example where ServiceMaster crews utilize their training and empathy to treat the people with respect and dignity. The crew that provides the routine cleanings knows them all and addresses them by name. Since we have started the routine cleanings, the city has seen a decrease in large encampments throughout the city and the number of instances where the police have to get involved diminish as well.

Company Name: County of Tehama Sheriff's Office
Address: 22840 Antelope Blvd.

City, State, Zip: Red Bluff, CA, 96080
Contact Person: Ashley Schaack
Phone Number: 530-528-8979
Email: [email protected]
Services Provided: Cleaned biohazardous waste including blood, vomit, fecal matter, urine and selivia from patrol vehicles, holding cells and crime scenes.

Page 31 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1328
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520
Name of Business: Contra Costa County Public Works - Maintenance Division Address: 2475 Waterbird Way, Martinez, CA 94553
Contact person & Title: Jason Quinones, Field Operations Manager Phone number: 925-723-2295
E-mail address: [email protected]
Description of Services: Cap of $3,000,00 for Homeless Encampment Abatement Services anEmergency d Biohazardous cleaning and Restoration Services.

Name of Business: City of Pittsburg
Address: 357 E. 12th St., Pittsburg, CA 94565
Contact person: Bryan Ballardo, Public Works Superintendent Phone number: 925-252-4908
E-mail address: [email protected]
Description of Services: Homeless Encampment Abatement Services. We have done a full decontamination cleaning and removal of all the drug paraphernalia from an abandoned structure that was being used as a ‘shoot house’. We also have removed biohazards from the City’s Courthouse, Library and City Hall. We removed 16 tons in one job in a ¾ mile long canal tunnel.

Name of Business: City of Antioch
Address: 1201 W. 4th St., Antioch, CA 94531
Contact person: Gonzalo “Jr.” Ramos, Collections Supervisor Phone number: 925-506-0393
Email address: [email protected]
Description of Services: Cap of $2,316,360 for Homeless Encampments Abatement, Illegal Dumping/ Debris Collection and Disposal, Biohazardous Collection and Disposal and Restoration Services. We have removed multiple large encampments. Most are a couple days of work and one was almost a References Continued
Additional Local Public Entity Clients:
 Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff
 Contra Costa County Public Works
 Contra Costa Health Services
 Judicial Council of California (JCC)
 CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
 California Highway Patrol
 County of San Mateo
 County of Sacramento
 City & County of San Francisco
 City of Sacramento
 City of Antioch
 City of Pittsburg
 City of Martinez
 City of Concord
 City of Oakland
 State of CA- Department of General Services
 Department of Veteran Affairs
 CA Sanitary Risk Management Authority
 Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District
 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
 City of San Jose
 City of Hayward
 City of Albany
 City of Novato
 City of Santa Rosa
 City of Redding
 City of South San Francisco
 City of Pacifica
 School Districts
 Colleges and University's

Page 32 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1329
Secretary of State
Certificate of Status
I, SHIRLEY N. WEBER, PH.D., California Secretary of State, hereby certify:

Entity Name: SHARJO, LLC
Entity No.: 1509470
Registration Date: 07/10/1989
Entity Type: Limited Liability Company - CA
Formed In: CALIFORNIA
Status: Active
The above referenced entity is active on the Secretary of State's records and is authorized to exercise all its powers, rights and privileges in California.

This certificate relates to the status of the entity on the Secretary of State’s records as of the date of this certificate and does not reflect documents that are pending review or other events that may impact status.

No information is available from this office regarding the financial condition, status of licenses, if any, business activities or practices of the entity.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I execute this certificate and affix the Great Seal of the State of California this day of June 07, 2024.

SHIRLEY N. WEBER, PH.D.

Secretary of State
Certificate No.:

To verify the issuance of this Certificate, use the Certificate No. above with the Secretary of State Certification Verification Search available at bizfileOnline.sos.ca.gov. 117290730
e) Current Licenses and Certifications

Page 33 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1330

Page 34 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1331
Yana Garcia
Secretary for
Environmental Protection
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Meredith Williams, Ph.D., Director
1001 "I" Street
P.O. Box 806
Sacramento, California 95812-0806
Gavin Newsom
Governor
ATTN: JEAN NADOLNE
SHARJO LLC HQ
5451 INDUSTRIAL WAY
BENICIA CA 94510
EPA ID Number Issued: April 3, 2001
Facility Location:
5451 INDUSTRIAL WAY
BENICIA CA 94510
PERMANENT RECORD ­ DO NOT DESTROY.

YOUR CALIFORNIA EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS:

CAR000072538
This is to acknowledge that a permanent California Environmental Protection Agency Identification (EPA ID) Number has been assigned to your place of business.

An EPA ID Number is assigned to a person or business at a specific site. It is only valid for the location and person or business to which it was assigned. If your business has multiple generation sites, each site must have its own unique number. If you stop handling hazardous waste, move your business, change ownership, change mailing address, or change the type or amount of waste you handle, you must notify the Department of Toxic Substances Control immediately. If your business has moved, your EPA ID Number must be canceled. A new number must be obtained for your new location if you continue to generate hazardous waste.

This EPA ID Number must be used for all manifesting, record keeping, and reporting requirements.

Please retain this notice in your files.

Department of Toxic Substances Control
For questions, visit our website at https://hwts.dtsc.ca.gov and select reports.

Operator's Initials: EPA
Version: January 2017

LICENCES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Page 35 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1332

LICENCES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Page 36 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1333

LICENCES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Page 37 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1334

APPLICATION FOR

PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION
Registration Information
Type: Public Works
Period: 07/01/2022 06/30/2025
Contractor Information
Contractor Name: SHARJO, INC.

Trade Name: SERVICEMASTER RESTORATION SERVICES
License Type Number: 1000017351
Contractor Physical Address
Contractor Name: SHARJO, INC.

Trade Name: ServiceMaster Recovery Management (SRM)
License Type Number: 1000017351
Contractor Physical Address
Physical Business Country: United States of America Physical Business City/ Province:

Benicia
Physical Business Address: 5451 Industrial Way Physical Business State: CA Physical Business Postal
Code:
94510
Contractor Mailing Address
Mailing Country: United States of America Mailing City /Province: Benicia Mailing Address: 5451 Industrial Way Mailing State: CA
Mailing Postal Code: 94510
Contact Info
Daytime Phone: Daytime Phone Ext.:

Mobile Phone: Business Email: [email protected]
Applicant’s Email: [email protected]

LICENCES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Page 38 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1335

LICENCES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Page 39 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1336

LICENCES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Page 40 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1337
Sharjo, LLC dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
has fulfilled the requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 402, and has received certification to conduct lead-based paint renovation, repair, and painting activities pursuant to 40 CFR Part 745.89
All EPA Administered States, Tribes, and Territories
This certification is valid from the date of issuance and expires May 27, 2025 NAT-45203-3
Certification #
March 25, 2020
Issued On
Michelle Price, Chief
Lead, Heavy Metals, and Inorganics Branch

LICENCES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Page 41 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1338

STATE OF CALIFORNIA-HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY
California Department of Public Health
Medical Waste Management Program
MS 7405, IMS K-2
P.O. Box 997377
Sacramento, CA 95899-7377
www.cdph.ca.gov/MedicalWaste

SHARJO, LLC SERVICE MASTER RESTORATION SERVICES
5451 Industrial Way
BENICIA, CA 94510
Dear Sir/Madam:

Gavin Newsom, Governor
Date: 2/5/2024
Registrant Identifier: TSW 738
Your Trauma Scene Waste Management Practitioner certificate is shown below. Please retain this certificate for your records.

If you have questions regarding this certificate, please call (916) 449-5671.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Public Health
Medical Waste Management Program

SHARJO, LLC SERVICE MASTER RESTORATION SERVICES
5451 Industrial Way
BENICIA, CA 94510
Registration No. Treatment No.
738
is registered as a

TRAUMA SCENE WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTITIONER
Annual Expiration Date
1/15/2025
The facility named herein is registered pursuant to the provisions of the Medical Waste Management Act, Division 104, Part 14, Chapter 5 of the California Health and Safety Code, and shall be subject to all applicable provisions of the law. This permit is not transferable.

Date Issued: 2/5/2024 Thomas Horner, Chief
Medical Waste Management Program
in the county of Solano

LICENCES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Page 42 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1339

LICENCES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Page 43 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1340
f) Project Approach to Delivering Services
ServiceMaster is properly licensed, trained, and qualified to safely handle and remove any biohazardous waste. ServiceMaster crews understand the importance of handling and disposing of biohazardous and/ or hazardous waste following all appropriate laws and regulations. It is extremely important to separate out any combustible liquid/container such as gasoline and propane tanks, motor oil, paint, lead and asbestos materials, chemicals, and corrosive materials, etc. to ensure they are not disposed of with other nonhazardous waste. Regulatory Guidelines- ServiceMaster is well versed and aligned with the established guidelines of the following agencies:
• Centersfor Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC)
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520
Since we have our Hazardous Waste Transporter Registration Certificate, we can legally transport the biohazardous waste to a disposal facility to be disposed of following all applicable laws and regulations.

We are aware of permits required by the Army Corp of Engineers, State of California, and/or Contra Costa County and how to obtain them. Additionally, we are trained in how to complete the CA Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest required in transporting hazardous waste.

Communication is KEY
When emergency crime scene and biohazardous cleaning services are needed there is no time to waste and important steps need to take place to successfully conduct these types of services. ServiceMaster has already trained, licensed, prepared and equipped our work force for these types of jobs well before we get the request for service from a client. Successful preparation, excellent communication and a large work force allow us to respond easily within the four-hour window for any City of Richmond's Police Department requests for service 24/7/365.

Request for Service
The City of Richmond's Police Department will be provided our 24/7/365 call center and direct cell phone and emails for all the key players. Both our call center and key players are well versed is dealing with police dispatch centers. Our team will gather all the required information from the dispatch center and relay instructions in real time to our team responding. It is vital for both parties to have all the necessary contact information of the other party.

Responding to the Requests
All of ServiceMaster's extensive training and preparation shine through when we get these calls for service. Our professionalism is apparent when responding to situations where we have to interact with the public, the officers, the cornier, the city representatives, etc. Our team knows how to conduct their job in a respectful, safe and efficient manner. They are trained to direct any communication/questions/ concern to the dedicated officer/city representative. We arrive promptly, clean and remove all physical hazards as well as biohazards while following all laws and regulations, and leave the area in a sanitized, clean and safe for the public/officer/city. Then we transport all physical hazards as well as biohazards for immediate disposal, while following all laws and regulations.

Page 44 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1341
g) Quality Control Measures
ServiceMaster understands the importance of ensuring we will provide the City of Richmond’s Police Department with the high quality of services required to successfully conduct these types of cleaning services on a routine as well as an emergency basis. Biohazardous and crime scene cleaning services, by nature, are dangerous. We fully understand the importance of selecting a vendor that not only can do the work but will do so without issues throughout the life of the agreement. ServiceMaster will implement quality control measures that protect our own people, the public and the City of Richmond’s Police Department.

Quality control measures start at the company level: ServiceMaster is an equal opportunity employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, gender expression, age, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation. We hire a diverse workforce at all levels and take pride in our ability to train and promote from within our company.

On the management side, we go out of our way to recognize employees that truly embody this mentality and display it at work. Including, but not limited to formal recognitions/awards all the way up to promotions and bonuses. By doing everything we can from a managerial side to provide trainings and foster a safe and respectful company culture for our own employees, it also empowers our employees to bring this same mentality with them to the job sites when interacting with the public and city representatives.

If any team member finds this type of work beyond what they can emotionally sustain, they will not be asked or required to perform such work. If team members experience any psychological issues after performing this type of work, the company will offer them professional help in understanding and dealing with their experiences.

ServiceMaster will never make our employees perform job tasks and/or work in situations that they are not fully comfortable and capable of working in. We fully understand that sometimes these trauma and biohazardous cleaning situations are not the right fit for some people. We will never discipline individuals that feel this way. Instead, we empower our staff to voice any/all concerns. That way, we can find the right type of work for them. This also helps us ensure that each person we put on these types of cleaning is the right fit for the job.

Quality control measures on the public interactions level: When performing trauma scene cleanups, team members might meet or interact with surviving family member(s). The sudden loss of a family member is one of the most traumatic events that a person can experience.

Then, at such a disturbing and stressful moment, to have a total stranger come onto the scene to perform cleanup work before the family’s real grieving process has begun makes for a difficult situation. Our team members may need to discuss business matters with an appropriate family member before work can commence. The following are best practices to follow when interacting with grieving family members:

Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 45 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1342
• Have one person be the point of contact who handles all communication with anyone outside the working team.
• Help those affected regain a sense of control of their situation. • Explain in as much detail as needed the cleanup steps to be taken and how long the process will take. Do not be graphic when providing details of the clean-up process. • Leave the customer with contact phone numbers as well as other pertinent documentation.

The following are practices to avoid while interacting with grieving family members:
• Do not ask questions about what happened that do not pertain to getting the info necessary to assess and remediate the loss site
o Should the client wish to recount the story, use active listening skills and have empathy to the situation
• Do not engage in any inappropriate conversation
• Do not make any definitive statements concerning the event Empathy and understanding of the situation and the emotions that are being felt is mandatory, and this requires a level of compassion and real sensitivity. The lead technician should receive training from a professional in the field of psychology who can explain what the family members are experiencing and how to work with them both to get the cleanup job completed and to be minimally intrusive into their lives during this time of distress.

It should go without saying, but everything that occurs at a trauma scene site is confidential.

Nothing should ever appear on social media in any form about what was seen, said or performed as work. Furthermore, all photographs of the scene taken before, during and after cleanup must remain strictly confidential. All photos and documentation must be on company issued devices and not on personal phones.

Quality control measures at the jobsite: Post cleaning testing is conducted utilizing ATP (adenosine triphosphate) – A substance present in all living cells that provides energy for many metabolic processes. Swab testing results in a reading or RLU, Relative Light Units. This refractive measurement indicates the presence or absence of biological matter. As a post cleaning test RLU of 0 is desired.

Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 46 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1343
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520
g) Continued- Reporting Mechanisms
Work Orders & Authorizations
From the start of a job to completion of work, ServiceMaster will provide the City of Richmond's Police Department with a dedicated administrative team. This team will be responsible for making sure all documentation, certifications, work orders, work authorizations and requests for orders are issued to the correct parties. They will be available to provide you with any documentation needed while a job is underway.

Completion of the Biohazardous Cleaning Project & Invoicing Packet:

At the end of every biohazardous cleaning project, ServiceMaster will notify the City of Richmond's Police Department of its completion and provide an invoicing packet as early as one week of job completion, but never longer than 30 days. Whichever the preferred delivery time frame of the City of Richmond's Police Department, we can easily accommodate. The invoice packets will include the projects type of debris removed, labor, materials and equipment used, before and after highdefinition pictures, biohazard/hazmat encountered, disposal costs, summary of agencies involved, and any other information that should be related to the city. The invoice packets will be supplied as per contract requirements and in the client’s preferred delivery method.

Monthly/Quarterly reports will be tracked and presented by Andy Dobbs, National Account Manager.

These reports can be a running spreadsheet. Each report will include all the specific and important information for each cleaning category. Including, but not limited to number of sites cleaned during that month/quarter, dates, locations (squad cars, holding cells, facilities, crime scenes), type of cleanings (routine, emergency, disinfecting, crime scene, biohazardous) total amount of waste removed, specific types of waste removed (routine trash, biohazardous waste, drug paraphernalia etc.) amount of marijuana disposed of and total costs per quarter for each category and/or anything else the City of Richmond's Police Department would like.

These reports can be easily customized to meet any specific requirements of the and/or anything else the City of Richmond's Police Department would like.

Follow up
We understand the importance of our clients and maintaining strong, long-term partnerships. To achieve this, we listen to what is important to them both in the overall partnership and within each project. We clearly communicate the scope of work needed on each project, update them as work is being done, let them know if there are uncovered challenges, do everything we stated we would do, and follow up after completion to make sure they are satisfied. At the completion of every job, we have a Certificate of Satisfaction document sent to the client. Additionally, every client is asked to complete an NPS survey and track the results so we can modify our training and processes if needed.

If at any time a client feels we did not meet their expectations, we discuss the issues, determine a resolution, and correct the issue.

Page 47 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1344
Machine Safety
Vehicle Safety
Hand and Power Tool Safety
COVID-19/Pandemic
Hot Conditions
Cold Conditions
Injury & Illness Prevention
Safe Lifting
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Ladder Safety
Hazard Communication
Emergency Action Plan
Confined Space Entry
Respiratory Protection
Hearing Conservation
Blood Bourne Pathogens
Ergonomics
Fall Protection
Powered Industrial Trucks
Chemical Safety
Compliance with Safety and Regulatory Requirements
In addition to the more detailed explanation provided in section c) p.21-29, ServiceMaster takes pride in our immaculate safety record while working on biohazardous projects. We have the training, experience, and professionalism to protect our own employees, the public and the public entity we are contracting.

ServiceMaster Restoration Services has a full-time Safety Manager that presents safety training to each employee as part of their on-boarding and continues it throughout their employment tenure with our company. Every morning starts with a safety meeting. Additionally, every employee that is working on an abatement project is required to wear all appropriate PPE and any other equipment needed to safely perform their task.

Our standard safety programs:

Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520
ServiceMaster will make any and all training records, licenses, and certifications available to the City of Richmond's Police Department. When you partner with ServiceMaster, you partner with a vendor that takes safety seriously!
Bloodborne Pathogen Safety Procedure and Training
Our bloodborne pathogen exposure plan is compliant with Federal and CalOSHA standards. The plan discusses the job titles and work tasks that would be potentially exposed to bloodborne pathogens. Our plan outlines the engineered controls, work practices and PPE necessary to protect our team from exposure. In the case of an exposure, the plan dictates the necessary response steps per OSHA and CalOSHA standards.

Training is done for new hires and all ServiceMaster Operations employees annually.

Cleaning Chemicals and Cleaning Agents
We care about preserving our planet and the safety of all that reside therein. Each of our branches has active recycling programs and energy saving equipment, heating, and lighting systems. Support employees can work remotely lowering their gas emissions. Lastly, our proprietary cleaning and disinfection products are eco-friendly. We would not and will not ever use any banned chemicals or cleaning agents as defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We will happily provide our SDS sheets, when needed.

Page 48 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1345
a) Cleaning and Biohazard Cleaning Services
Over the years ServiceMaster has seen most of the biohazardous waste and crime scene cleanup can be properly conducted with a crew of two to three. While a skilled set of a couple technicians with one vehicle with all the needed materials, tools, PPE, etc. should be able to accommodate a large number of these requests for services, ServiceMaster wanted to include our full prevailing wage price sheet (see. p. 54-59) in addition, for your review.

Labor Rates: The below labor rates include all health, dental, vision, paid vacations, and 401K options, overhead and profit and will be the total labor costs the City of Richmond's Police Department.

Restoration Technician= $125 an hour, per Tech or $187.50 an hour, per Tech (OT/Weekend) o The Restoration Technicians will be responsible for doing any cleaning requests of us.

Project Manager= $135 an hour, per Project Manager
o Responsible for supporting the Technicians in the field with everything needed to safely and efficiently conduct the cleanings. Would be brought in on any larger, or challenging cleaning projects.

Admin. Asst./Clerical= $47 an hour, per Admin. Asst./Clerical o An average of one hour total needed per cleaning project.

National Account Manager= $0 charge to the City of Richmond's Police Department. Andy Dobbs will serve as the main point of contact for the City of Richmond's Police Department. Even though there is not going to be a charge for his time, he will also commit to managing the contract, be available to receive new job requests, provide updates on job progress, communicate any issues, and ensure accurate billing invoice packets are sent to the client.

Andy will also be available to attend any monthly/quarterly meetings needed. At these monthly/ quarterly meetings he will present a report on all request for services from the previous term, the cost, and any other information the client would like. These reports are easily customized to meet any contract and client preferences.

Branch Manager, Regional Manager, or Chief Operating Officer= $0. the City of Richmond's Police Department will not incur a charge for any time spent on a project from these roles.

Administrative Costs: We provided the cost for any possible charge that is separate from the labor rates. Further explanation is needed because not all of these will be charged each day and will vary based on the size and severity of a specific job. If there is a large biohazardous cleaning job that would require a large labor force/more labor hours and would as well require more materials, equipment and amount of disposal charges in comparison to smaller jobs, so we hope this explanation helps add further clarification.

B. Cost
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 49 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1346
Materials & Equipment
Bags, 6 mil, Black= $109 for a roll of 75 bags. These are used to bag/transport nonhazardous waste. The City of Richmond's Police Department would only be charged the amount used for the day and would be reflected in the invoice packet.

Tyvek suits with hood and boot= $14 per pair, per technician. The City of Richmond's Police Department would only be charged the amount used for the day and would be reflected in the invoice packet.

Full Face Respirator Mask= $22.50 each. One per technician per day, in general.

Respirator P-100 Pancake Filter= $25 each.

Gloves, Latex Disposal= $37.50 for a box of 100. The City of Richmond's Police Department would only be charged the amount used for the day and would be reflected in the invoice packet.

Gloves, Leather= $13 per pair. Our technicians are instructed to treat these as their own and attempt to use them as long as possible, if they are able to be safely cleaned.

Duct Tape= $8 per roll. The City of Richmond's Police Department would only be charged the amount used for the day and would be reflected in the invoice packet.

Vehicles (Box Truck, Hydraulic Demo Truck, Van- Cargo/Passenger and Field/Supervisor ½ Ton Truck) The City of Richmond's Police Department would only be charged the rate per hour used per vehicle and that charge would be reflected in the invoice packet.

To add a little more clarity on the vehicles, here are the most common ways they are used for this type of work: Smaller jobs that only need two technicians would only need one vehicle. As the jobs increase in size and severity, where more labor force is required so would the need for additional vehicles. We will perform best practices and use only the required vehicles for the day/specific job.

Hazardous Material Disposal= $250 for a 55-Gallon Drum.

Disposal Charge (Non-Hazardous)= Disposal cost plus 20%. The City of Richmond's Police Department would only be charged the daily disposal used for the day and our invoice packet would also include the actual dump receipt as proof of accurate charge to the client.

Small Tools Charge= 3% of the total labor charge each day.

Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 50 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1347
b) Emergency Response Services
The hourly rate of all services, including routine/planned, deep cleaning, biohazardous cleanings and any emergency response services will be the same as above. The only variable being the time of day/night.

Restoration Technician= $125 an hour (Monday- Friday 7am-5pm) Restoration Technician= $187.50 an hour (5pm-7am and weekends) Project Manager= $135 an hour (Monday- Friday 7am-5pm)
Project Manager= $202.50 an hour (5pm-7am and weekends) • All material, equipment, tools and/or any additional fees will not be impacted by the time/day of the requested services.
• ServiceMaster is an emergency response restoration vendor. We fully understand the importance of being able to respond to requests for services immediately. Our general response time upon first notification of a loss/request for services is 1-3 hours. We can 100% guarantee our response times will be within, or sooner than the City of Richmond Police Department’s 4-hour maximum response time.

While our Concord branch will be mainly responding to any new, or emergency cleaning services request and will have no issues being on-site within the 4-hour maximum response time but should there be a reason this branch cannot get there in time, we can deploy from multiple other branches (Benicia, Santa Rosa or Milpitas). No matter what ServiceMaster will be able to respond 24/4/365 and be on-site within 4-hours. • ServiceMaster will not be charging an additional fee for emergency response services.

ServiceMaster has provided these services for many public entities in the Bay Area, and we are committed to the long-term type of partnership as well. We are more than happy to customize our labor force, materials, and equipment to fit your exact needs. If our rates and how we provided the additional explanation does not conform to your already existing model, we would greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss with the City of Richmond's Police Department representative so we can get a better understanding what you are exactly looking for and come back to you with any alterations you would like.
***Full Prevailing Wage Price Sheet on p. 54-59***
Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 51 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1348
C. Scope of Services
The detailed description of ServiceMaster’s cleaning processes, techniques and how regulatory compliance and safety standards on p. 21-29 provides evidence that ServiceMaster can meet or exceed all the requirements of the Scope of Services.

ServiceMaster will follow all protocols for cleaning and disinfecting the Police Department gym, bunk house, temporary holding facilities, other facilities of the Police Department and Police Department vehicles. As well as cleaning disinfecting, and sanitizing crime scenes in residential areas, commercial areas, vehicles, and open-air public and private areas withing the City of Richmond.

ServiceMaster is fully capable and willing to respond to crime scenes, traffic collisions, jails, City buildings, City property, City vehicles and will fully remove and dispose of ALL biohazardous waste. Including, but not limited to, bodily fluids, drug paraphernalia, sharps, clothing, sewage discharge, vomit, blood, marijuana destruction and/or any other waste the City of Richmond and the City of Richmond’s Police Department needs us to take care of.

Declarations
Livescan Background Checks: ALL ServiceMaster employees must go through a background check. Including, but not limited to a Livescan background check. So, we will have no issues participating in this, or any other background checks required by the Police Department.

Assignment of Sub-Contractor: Hazardous Disposal- ServiceMaster will utilize a vendor only to complete the actual disposal of hazardous waste:
• Blood and OPIM will be disposed of through approved vendor, Easy Waste Management.
• Marijuana destruction will be handled through approved vender, Easy Waste Management . Vendor will supply a Record of Destruction log to include (but not limited to) the date, time, substance, name, signature, and location of destruction or disposal/quantity of biohazardous waste.
• We have worked with this vendor on a routine basis for years and have never had an issue with their response time, quality of work and ability to maintain and/or produce any Record of Destruction logs that abide by all federal, state and local laws and regulations. We are fully confident there will be no issue obtaining these logs to be submitted to the City of Richmond’s Police Department on a monthly basis.

Exceptions to this Request for Proposals: ServiceMaster has reviewed the RFP and the City of Richmond’s Standard Contract Agreement (Attachment 1), and state we have NO exceptions to either. Additionally, we state we have fully reviewed the C. Scope of Services and declare we meet or exceed all the requirements within and would be fully able to provide all these services throughout the life of the potential three-year term.

Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 52 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1349
Statement of Impartiality and Disclosure: ServiceMaster as the prime vendor and Easy Waste Management as the sub-vendor declare we are not currently, and will not, during the performance of these services, participate in any similar work involving a third party with interests currently in conflict or likely to conflict with the City of Richmond’s interests.

Pending or Active Investigations or Litigations: ServiceMaster affirmatively states we have no pending investigations or litigations and have had no contract failures, no civil or criminal investigations or litigations pending within the last five years.

Insurance Requirements: ServiceMaster has current insurance that meets the City of Richmond’s standards. See p. 69.

Business Licenses: ServiceMaster currently has a City of Richmond Business License and will ensure to renew it annually throughout the term of the agreement. See p. 34.

Compliance with City Ordinances: ServiceMaster has reviewed and will comply with the City of Richmond’s City Ordinances.

Collusion: ServiceMaster declares our proposal is genuine and on behalf of ours alone. We have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other person to submit a false proposal, or any other person to refrain from submitting a proposal. We have not, in any manner, sought collusion to secure any improper advantage over any other person submitting a proposal.

Sharjo, LLC
dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services
195 Mason Circle
Concord, CA 94520

Page 53 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1350
Time & Material Rate Sheet
Prevailing Wage Rate Sheet - California
Prices good through December 31, 2026

RESTORATION LABOR CLASSIFICATION RATES
Project Coordinator (PC)* $ 175.00
Account Coordinator - National Accounts (AC)* $ 175.00
Project Manager (PM) $ 150.00
Assistant Project Manager (APM)/Superintendent $ 145.00 Restoration Supervisor (RS) $ 135.00
Resource/Supply Coordinator (RC) $ 125.00
Restoration Tech (RT) $ 125.00
Project Auditor (PA) $ 145.00
Certified Mold Remediation Technician (CRT) $ 135.00
Health & Safety Officer (HSO) $ 150.00
Admin Assistant / Clerical (CL) $ 105.00
Restoration Labor (RL) $ 112.50

1. The company shall be compensated for Per Diem for out of town workers at the rate of $60 per person, per day for each day personnel (excluding casual labor, unless otherwise negotiated) work on the project plus twenty one percent.

Labor Considerations

1. The above rates apply to personnel engaged to fulfill the terms of the contract, whether regular full time employees of ServiceMaster Recovery Management (SRM), employees of ServiceMaster franchisees, temporary hires employed directly by SRM or personnel secured through a labor service or vendor source.

2. Standard rates will apply to the first 8 hours worked per day. Overtime (1.5 x the standard rate) will be charged for hours worked over 8 hours per day .

3. Work on Saturdays and Sundays will be charged at 1.5 x the standard rate for all hours worked.

4. In the event SRM personnel are dispatched to perform emergency services between the hours of 5 p.m. and 8 a.m., those hours will be charged at 1.5 times the standard rate.

5. All hours worked on SRM recognized holidays (New Years Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve, and Christmas Day) will be charged at 2 times the regular rate.

6. In the event that SRM is required to pay time and a half for any work performed, pursuant to State or Federal law, the rates charged will be 1.5 times the standard hourly rate.

8. Prevailing Rate: (Davis Bacon Act) Prevailing rates will be paid on all applicable jobs that fall under the (Davis Bacon Act) Prevailing Rate Wage. Rates will be obtained from State where work is being performed. THE CUSTOMER will be responsible for notifying SRM if Prevailing rates apply. SRM will adjust rates as necessary.

7. In the event that SRM is required to pay double time for any work performed, pursuant to State or Federal law, the rates charged will be 2 times the standard hourly rate.

Labor Considerations: Continued

9. To the extent the work under a particular contract is subject to Federal and State minimum wage or hour laws or collective bargaining agreements which modify SRM standard rates and practices, adjustments shall be made to the hourly rate and other labor provisions as necessary.

10. When circumstances beyond our control require Personnel or casual labor under contract to be delayed from beginning work, the Standard Rate/Hour will be charged per labor category, per person delayed.

11. Travel Time shall be billed at the applicable labor rate for personnel traveling to and from a job.

12. Management of Customer Labor force line is utilized when SRM is managing the customer's labor force. The customer is responsible for paying the wages, associated taxes, benefits and insurance for their own employees.

13. SRM Reserves the right to add additional labor classifications with rates determined by SRM.

14. 4.**** Labor Rates listed exclude environmental, hazardous materials, bio-hazard, and trauma cleanup services.

Travel and Subsistence Considerations
Labor ServiceMaster Recovery Management Initials _______ Page 1

FULL PREVAILING WAGE PRICE SHEET

Page 54 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1351
Taxes and Fees

1. The rates contained in this Schedule are exclusive of any associated permits or fees. Those Permit costs and Fees shall be billed by the company to the customer, and shall be compensated for all such costs on the basis of actual costs incurred for such items plus 20%.

2. Federal, state, and local taxes will be charged at cost as required by laws where services are provided. If the customer is Tax Exempt, it must make the company aware of this exemption, and provide the company with copies of all such supporting Tax Exempt status. Any Tax incurred by the company prior to such notification of a Tax Exempt status, shall be reimbursed to the company by the customer. All taxes are not included in any "Not to Exceed" or "Lump Sum" Contract, and shall be treated as additional billing above and beyond these amounts.

Catastrophe Considerations

1. A Catastrophe Surcharge of 5% of the total billing will be added to all billing to capture the significant costs required in the coordinated response to a catastrophic event which are not specifically addressed elsewhere in the rate schedule. Examples of these charges would be management, administrative support, warehousing, procurement and logistics.

2. In the event of a large scale regional event which prevents the use of traditional hotel accommodations, an allowance may be calculated to reflect the necessary alternatives such as travel trailers, mobile housing units, or man camps.

General Considerations

1. A small tools charge of 3% will be assessed on labor charges, with the exception of Project Manager, Assistant Project Manager, Project Accountant, and Clerk.

Subcontracted Services

3. SRM shall be compensated for Lodging at the rate of cost plus 20%.

2.Travel and related expense charges will be invoiced at cost plus 21%

1. Subcontracted services will be invoiced at cost plus 20%.

Labor ServiceMaster Recovery Management Initials _______ Page 2

Page 55 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1352
Company Supplied Materials
*Note that chemicals marked with an “*” are concentrated chemicals.

Prices Good through December 31, 2026
Cleaner, Carpet & Upholstery UNIT UNIT COST Cleaner, Hard Surface UNIT UNIT COST FF Liquid Ultra Clean P (23464)* Gallon $ 44.46 All Purpose Cleaner 2 (32994)* Concentrate Gallon $ 37.58 FiberFresh Allclean (23214)* Gallon $ 29.33 Cleaner, HVAC Coil (Can) (16294) Each $ 24.59 FiberFresh Release 3 (23375) Lb $ 361.17 Floorstar Cleaner - Terrazzo, Marble & Wood Gallon $ 22.00 Foam Control (23034) Gallon $ 72.88 FloorStar DuoClene (32154)* Concentrate Gallon $ 14.67 Green for Carpets (23704)* Gallon $ 31.76 Floor Star Grout Piranha Gallon $ 31.13 Rust Remover (37052) Pint $ 9.17 FloorStar Heavy Duty Floor & Equipment Degreaser II (32584)* Concentrate Gallon $ 27.54 Solvent Upholstery Cleaner (23004) Gallon $ 47.21 Floor Star Light Duty Cleaner * Concentrate Gallon $ 17.88 SolvOil Advanced(27914) Gallon $ 70.58 GlassClene Pro (23424)* Concentrate Gallon $ 23.83 Lubricant, Electrical UNIT UNIT COST GlideRinse 4 (33204)* Concentrate Gallon $ 29.33 LPS 1 - Lubricant - or equivalent Gallon $ 125.73 Green for Degreasing (33404)* Concentrate Gallon $ 38.02 LPS 2 - Lubricant - or equivalent Gallon $ 91.65 Green for Floors (33504)* Concentrate Gallon $ 38.02 LPS 3 - Rust Inhibitor or equivalent Gallon $ 185.90 Green for restrooms (23944)* Concentrate Gallon $ 32.25 General Consumables UNIT UNIT COST Scrub N' Shine Plus (23249) Quart $ 7.33 Bags, (6 mil 33"x 50"), black Roll / 75 $ 109.00 SM Lemon Furniture Polish (23919) Can $ 8.56 Bags, Contractor (3 mil) 33' x 48" A81834 Box / 50 $ 54.03 Stainless Steel Polish (23889) Can $ 11.62 Blue Block Carpet Protectors (40035) Case/1008 $ 85.51 Wallglide BioLift 25315 5 Gallon $ 229.17 Bottled Water (case 24) Case $ 12.10 Wallglide BioSeal 25325 5 Gallon $ 504.17 Builder's Board, 48" x 100' Roll (RamBoard) Roll $ 216.33 WallGlide DeepClene (23534)* Concentrate Gallon $ 32.14 Builder's Board, 38" x 100' Roll (Ramboard) Roll $ 141.68 WallGlide Plus - ER (23274)*(Green) Concentrate Gallon $ 42.17 Carpet Protector Foil Tabs (3" x 3") [SM600182] Case/5000 $ 146.67 WallGlide Plus (23244)* Concentrate Gallon $ 43.47 Carpet Shield, 200' Roll 56188 Roll $ 104.50 Mitigation UNIT UNIT COST Clothing, Dust Coveralls Each $ 10.50 Benefect 20475 Botanical Broad Spectrum Disinfectant Gallon $ 89.83 Clothing, Tyvek coverall with hood and boot Each $ 14.00 Benefect Atomic Degreaser Gallon $ 73.33 DEF Fluid 2.5 Gallon $ 27.50 Benefect Decon 30 Gallon $ 80.48 Disposable Rubber Boot covers pair $ 11.40 Bioesque Degreaser Gallon $ 53.99 Duct, Lay Flat (500') - 20" LF $ 1.30 Bioesque Disinfectant Gallon $ 61.45 Duct, Lay Flat (500') - 12" LF $ 1.00 Bio Spray Solution Gallon $ 64.17 Dust Mask, HEPA (N95) Box / 10 $ 40.00 Chemical Sponges , Dry Cleaning Sponge (42082) Each $ 4.00 Duster, 51" Handle Hand Each $ 91.12 DP #1 Poly Sheeting Hangers (Case) Case/100 $ 412.89 Filter f/ portable dehu Each $ 47.81 DP #3 BLUE Plastic Poly Hangers (Case) Case/100 $ 663.69 Filter, Air Scrubber - Carbon Treated 16 x 16 x 2 Each $ 31.59 Fosters 40-20 Fungicidal Protective Coating (white pigmented) 5 Gallon $ 763.36 Filter, Air Scrubber - Charcoal 16 x 16 x 2 Each $ 207.08 Painters Plastic (12'X400') .31 mil Roll $ 45.00 Filter, Air Scrubber - Carbon Treated 24 x 24 x 2 Each $ 33.61 Plastic Sheeting (20'X100') 4-Mil Roll $ 148.70 Filter, Air Scrubber - Charcoal 24 x 24 x 2 Each $ 302.56 Plastic Sheeting (20'X100') 6-Mil Roll $ 196.00 Filter, Air Scrubber - HEPA block Each $ 320.25 Plastic Sheeting 6-mil Fire Retardant 12' x 100' Roll $ 331.00 Filter, Air Scrubber - Pleated Secondary Each $ 16.46 Plastic Sheeting 6-mil Fire Retardant, Anti Static 20 x 100 Roll $ 1,340.61 Filter, Air Scrubber - Primary media Each $ 4.50 Prokure V 0.84 oz liquid Each $ 65.91 Filter, OdorKlenz Odor Elimination Filter, 16" x 16" (NANO) Each $ 151.25 Prokure V 4.2 Oz liquid Each $ 183.24 Filter, OdorKlenz Odor Elimination Filter, 24" x 24" (NANO) Each $ 275.00 SaniMaster, disinfectant * Concentrate 23794 Gallon $ 61.88 Filter, Vacuum - HEPA Dust Bags Each $ 11.00 Serum 1000 5 Gallon $ 304.57 Filter, Vacuum - HEPA Large Each $ 406.00 Bio Planet Multi purpose Disinfectant Gallon $ 42.50 Filter, Vacuum - Medium Each $ 213.23 Vinyl Oxide Hospital Disinfectant Gallon $ 72.00 Filter, Vacuum Bags Each $ 2.60
Floor Adhesive Remover 5 Gallon $ 149.01 Roto Pads UNIT UNIT COST Floor protection - Sticky Mats 33" x 38" 30 per pad Each $ 89.00 Various Scrub Pad, 15-20" for Floor machine Each $ 10.56 Furniture Blanket - 72" x 80" - 1 time charge Each $ 27.65 Deodorization UNIT UNIT COST Gloves, Latex / Nitrile Disposable Large (41508) Box/100 $ 42.72 Odor Neutralizer (23398)* Concentrate Quart $ 43.54 Gloves, Leather palm work Pair $ 12.27 Unsmoke Unsoot #1 (114807) Gallon $ 93.84 Gloves, Cut Resistant Pair $ 22.50 OdorGo Fresh Wave Natural Odor Eliminator Gel (25512) 24 oz jar Quart $ 100.83 Gloves, Work Cotton (41070) Pair $ 3.00 OdorGo Room Deodorant Pro (23259)* Concentrate Pint $ 9.93 Hand Pad, Medium duty, Green 6" x 9" (44501) Pack/10 $ 10.08 OdorGo Smoke Odor Concentrate * (24204) Gallon $ 134.27 Hand Pad, Scouring Sponge, White/ Yellow A87318 Pack/10 $ 18.46 OdorGo Thermal Fog (23184) Gallon $ 110.70 Hand Pad, Octopus , Scrub pad for handle (44503, 44504, 44505) Pack/5 $ 22.28 OdorX Bad Odor Blocks Each $ 7.08 Hog Rings Box $ 17.38 OdorX Thermo 55 (solvent based) Gallon $ 161.13 Mop Head Each $ 18.06 Prokure D Gas 50 grams Each $ 89.38 Respirator P-100 Pancake Filter (Pair) Pair $ 25.00 Prokure G Gas 25 Grams Each $ 73.24 Respirator P-100 Vapor filter (Pair) Pair $ 46.22 Packing / Moving UNIT UNIT COST Restorator Cartridge, Vaportek (15474) Each $ 163.33 Box, File, Book /Freeze Dry 15" x 12" x 10" Each $ 7.15 Sealer, soot, white pigmented, oil based 5 Gallon $ 453.13 Box, Dish Pack Each $ 12.56 Shoecovers,Poly,X-Large 1651-2612 150 Pair $ 83.73 Box, Small 1.5 - 2 Cu. Ft. Each $ 3.45 Silver Armour Encapsulant 2600-0632 5 Gallon $ 429.00 Box, Medium, 18" x 18" x 16" Each $ 5.94 Spray Adhesive, M77 or equivalent Can $ 15.99 Box, Large 18" x 18" x 24" Each $ 7.50 Spray bottle w/trigger Each $ 4.95 Bubble Wrap 12" x 750' Roll $ 82.50 Tape, Blue Painters - 2" wide or greater, 60 yards long Roll $ 19.30 Bubble Wrap 12" x 250' Roll $ 40.33 Tape, Caution, (1000 FT) Roll $ 36.61 Corrugated Paper 24" x 250' roll Roll $ 67.83 Tape, Double sided 2" x 36 yards Roll $ 22.65 Inventory Tags Box / 1000$ 45.83 Tape, Duct Roll $ 16.10 Packing Paper (50 lb) Bundle $ 99.00 Tape, HVAC (Aluminum) Roll $ 62.66 Tape, Brown packing 2" x 60 yds Roll $ 12.74 Tape. Preservation Roll $ 28.06 Tarps UNIT UNIT COST
Tape, Builder board tape Roll $ 32.85 Poly Tarp 8'X12' Each $ 29.33 Towel, Dust Cloth, Treated 24"x24" (41530) Box/50 $ 293.98 Poly Tarp 12'X16' Each $ 60.50 Towels, Microfiber - per dozen Dozen $ 22.00 Poly Tarp 16'X20' Each $ 99.00 Towels,Terry Towels Dozen $ 33.40 Poly Tarp 20'X30' Each $ 96.00 Vacuum Accessories, 3" round brush Each $ 14.61 Poly Tarp 20'X40' Each $ 249.33 Wall Washing Pads Each $ 2.95 Poly Tarp30'X50' Each $ 467.50 Wrap, Stretch 18"' X 1500' Roll $ 61.82 Tarp Clips Each $ 4.02 Zipper, Zip wall per package of 2 Box $ 47.81
Materials Considerations

1. The rate schedule lists the most commonly used items. SRM reserves the right to add items to the materials / Consumables schedule during the course of the work.

Materials ServiceMaster Recovery Management Initials _________Page 3

2. Non-scheduled materials purchased for the completion of the work will be billed at cost plus 20%.

Page 56 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1353
Company Supplied Equipment
Prices good through December 31, 2026
General Unit Daily Distribution Equipment / Lighting Unit Daily 20" Roto Floor Machine Ea. $ 55.00 #2 banded 5 wire cable 50' section * Ea. $ 38.00 Technology Package - Per User (Software, Computer,
Tablet, Printer, and accessories) Ea. $ 50.00 #2 banded 5 wire female / Male tail * Ea. $ 20.00 Air Compressor Accessories Ea. $ 10.00 4/0 Cable, CamlLock 100' * Ea. $ 44.00 Air Compressor, Portable electric * Ea. $ 40.00 4/0 Cable, CamLock 50' * Ea. $ 22.00 Air Scrubber 1500 CFM to 4000 CFM * Ea. $ 150.00 Cable, CamLock T * Ea. $ 10.00 Air Scrubber <1500 CFM * Ea. $ 75.00 50' Spider box cable 6/4 * Ea. $ 32.00 Airless Sprayer * Ea. $ 125.00 100' Spider box cable 6/4 * Ea. $ 64.00 Media Blasting Unit - (Comp. Not Incl.) Ea. $ 800.00 4/0 pig tail leads male / female * Ea. $ 10.00 Portable Carpet Cleaning Machine * Ea. $ 125.00 100 Amp Distribution Panel * Ea. $ 115.00 Cart, Flat Cart Ea. $ 30.00 200 Amp Distribution Panel * Ea. $ 195.00 Cart, Poly Dump Cart Ea. $ 35.00 400 Amp Distribution Panel * Ea. $ 275.00 Dolly - Appliance Ea. $ 18.00 225KVA 480v-208v transformer * Ea. $ 380.00 Drill, Cordless Ea. $ 10.00 Light, Demo / Drop / Stand /String * Ea. $ 15.00 Drum, Plastic DOT safety with base Ea. $ 10.00 Light Tower, Diesel - Tow Behind * Ea. $ 150.00 Dry Cleaning Unit (Portable) Ea. $ 140.00 Wobble Light * Ea. $ 45.00 Extraction Unit - Truck mounted (Per 8 hour shift) Ea. $ 500.00 Pig tail, Stove Adapter 50 Amp * Ea. $ 6.00 Extraction Unit (Portable Carpet) * Ea. $ 125.00 Quad Box String (QBS) 30' GFI * Ea. $ 32.00 Floor Scraper, Electric Walk Behind * Ea. $ 225.00 Quad Box String (QBS) Extension * Ea. $ 18.00 Fogger, Thermal (Gas Powered) Ea. $ 90.00 Ramps, Cable * Ea. $ 15.00 Fogger, ULV / Thermal (Electrical) Ea. $ 44.00 Spider Box * Ea. $ 64.00 Furniture Blankets * Ea. $ 2.50 50' Pin/Sleeve Extension * Ea. $ 35.00 Ground Fault Interupter (GFI) * Ea. $ 5.00 Drying / Mitigation Equipment Description Unit Daily Heater, Portable Propane Ea. $ 40.00 25 Ton DX Air Conditioner * Ea. $ 1,200.00 Hose, 1 1/2" - 2" water supply (Firehose) 50' Ea. $ 13.00 30 Ton DX Air Conditioner w/ Dehumidification * Ea. $ 1,425.00 HVAC Cleaning System (portable) * Ea. $ 250.00 1.5 kW Portable Electric Heater * Ea. $ 25.00 HVAC Video / Tool Robot Ea. $ 150.00 60kW Electric Heater * Ea. $ 335.00 Hydroxyl Generator, Boss XL3 Ea. $ 250.00 90kW Electric Heater * Ea. $ 425.00 MI-FI Wireless internet Router Ea. $ 8.00 150kW Electric Heater * Ea. $ 520.00 Mop Handle, Bucket and Wringer Ea. $ 5.00 Air Mover / Axial Fan * Ea. $ 30.00 Ozone Machine - Portable * Ea. $ 175.00 Dehumdifier, LGR - 80 - 130 AHAM PPD * Ea. $ 130.00 Phone, Portable Satellite (airtime charged seperately) Ea. $ 32.55 Dehumidifier, LGR - >130 AHAM PPD * Ea. $ 182.00 Pressure Washer - 1000 psi electric cold water * Ea. $ 75.00 Desiccant Dehumidifier 1000 CFM Ea. $ 520.00 Pressure Washer - 1500 - 3500 psi gas cold water * Ea. $ 100.00 Desiccant Dehumidifier 2000 CFM Ea. $ 1,005.00 Pressure Washer - Hot Water portable * Ea. $ 135.00 Desiccant Dehumidifier 300 CFM Ea. $ 238.00 Pump, Sump - 3/4" submersible Ea. $ 40.00 Desiccant Dehumidifier 5000 CFM Ea. $ 1,475.00 Pump, Trash 2" - 4" gas trash pump * Ea. $ 162.00 Dessicant Dehumidifier 7500 CFM Ea. $ 1,860.00 Pump, Trash 2" discharge hose 50' Ea. $ 13.00 Desiccant Dehumidifier 10000 CFM Ea. $ 2,375.00 Pump, Trash 3-4" diesel * Ea. $ 246.00 Desiccant Dehumidifier 15000 CFM Ea. $ 3,500.00 Radio, 2 way / cell phone - Job Site Communication Ea. $ 16.00 Ducting, 20 - 25" x 25' event pipe (Non insulated) * Ea. $ 27.00 Sander, Palm Ea. $ 5.00 Ducting, 12" x 25' (Non insulated) * Ea. $ 18.00 Saw, Chain Ea. $ 25.00 Duct Connection, 20" Wye * Ea. $ 20.00 Saw, Kett Ea. $ 35.00 Duct Reducer, 20" to 12" * Ea. $ 15.00 Scaffold, (Baker / Perry - per section) * Ea. $ 42.00 Injecti-Dry System or similar * Ea. $ 145.00 Tent, 10' x 10' outdoor canopy * Ea. $ 32.00 Insulated Heater Duct 20" x 25' * Ea. $ 32.00 Tent, 20 x 40 Outdoor Event * Ea. $ 100.00 Insulated A/C Duct 20" x 25' * Ea. $ 32.00 Trash Barrel / Trash Can Ea. $ 5.00 Moisture Mapping kit (meters and accessories) * Ea. $ 65.00 Ultrasonic Bath, Large * Ea. $ 375.00 Portable AC Unit - 2 Ton * Ea. $ 228.00 Vacuum, HEPA * Ea. $ 100.00 Recording Micromanometer * Ea. $ 75.00 Vacuum, Shop (Canister or Wet/Dry) * Ea. $ 30.00 Voltage Testing Equipment * Ea. $ 20.00 Vacuum, Upright Ea. $ 15.00
Wall Trowel (wall cleaning system) Ea. $ 22.75
Water dispersement diaphragm with regulator-6 station Ea. $ 120.00 Wheelbarrow / Floor Dolly Ea. $ 6.00
Zip Wall Poles (Pair) * Ea. $ 20.00
Note: Please note that costs reflect 2024 pricing, and these are reviewed and adjusted annually.

Equipment ServiceMaster Recovery Management Initials ________ Page 4

Page 57 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1354
Company Supplied Equipment: Continued
Prices good through December 31, 2026
Generators Unit Daily Vehicles / Trailers Unit Daily
Generator < 10KW (10000 watt) * Ea. $ 135.00 10k 42' to 48' Telehandler * Ea. $ 978.00 Generator 20KW * Ea. $ 390.00 Mileage - 3/4 ton, 1 Ton, Box Truck Ea. $ 0.85 Generator 40KW * Ea. $ 480.00 Mileage - Car / Van / LT PU Ea. IRS Rate Generator 60 KW * Ea. $ 595.00 Mileage - Semi Truck Ea. $ 5.50 Generator 100 KW * Ea. $ 852.00 Semi Truck - Tractor Only Ea. $ 350.00 Generator 150 / 175 KW * Ea. $ 960.00 Trailer - Flatbed < 20' Ea. $ 30.00 Generator 200 / 275KW * Ea. $ 1,055.00 Trailer - Flatbed 21' - 35' Ea. $ 50.00 Generator 320 KW * Ea. $ 1,475.00 Trailer - Enclosed < 20' Ea. $ 40.00 Generator 350 KW * Ea. $ 1,925.00 Trailer - Enclosed 21' to 35' Ea. $ 55.00 Generator 500 KW * Ea. $ 2,800.00 Trailer - 30' Gooseneck Heavy Duty Ea. $ 145.00 Generator 750 KW * Ea. $ 4,885.00 Trailer - 45' Gooseneck Heavy Duty Ea. $ 185.00 Generator 1,000 KW * Ea. $ 5,775.00 Trailer - 20' Mobile Office Ea. $ 125.00 Generator 1,500 KW * Ea. $ 7,800.00 Trailer - 46' Mobile Office Ea. $ 175.00 Generator 2,000 KW * Ea. $ 7,950.00 Trailer - 53' Semi Mobile Office Ea. $ 200.00 Safety Packages Unit Daily Trailer - 43' to 53' Semi Box Ea. $ 200.00 Personal Fall Protection (PFP) - Harness and Lanyard * Ea. $ 32.00 Trailer - hydraulic dump trailer(does not include dump fees) Ea. 115.00 $
Personal Protection Equipment (Hard Hat, Goggles, Vest, Pair Gloves) * Ea. 13.50 $ Trailer - Duct Cleaning unit and equipment (compressor and vacuum) Ea. 850.00 $ PPE Package w Respirator - (Hard Hat, Goggles, Vest, PR Gloves, Respirator - no filters) * Ea. 22.50 $ Utility / personal transportation cart (i.e golf cart) Ea. $ 45.00 Specialty Equipment Unit Daily Vehicle - Box Truck - up to 23' Ea. $ 175.00 Bio Spray CO2 tank Ea. $ 15.00 Vehicle - Box Truck - 24' Ea. $ 225.00 360 Camera Ea. 150.00 $ Vehicle - Field / Supervisor (Car, 1/2 ton truck, SUV) Ea. $ 76.00 Bio Spray Unit Ea. $ 225.00 Vehicle - Mobile Command Center Ea. $ 275.00 Drone - Video/Photo Ea. $ 200.00 Vehicle - Pulling Truck 3/4 Ton + Ea. $ 150.00 Electrostatic Sprayer Ea. $ 225.00 Vehicle - Van - Cargo / Passenger Ea. $ 125.00 Extractor, Ride on Type (Xtreme Xtractor) Ea. 150.00 $ Vehicle - RV/Travel Trailer (excludes utilities/site fee) Ea. 150.00 $ Fuel Transfer Tank - 100 gallon Ea. $ 52.00
Fuel Transfer Tank Demand Pump (for fuel delivery system) Ea. $ 30.00 Fuel Transfer Trailer - 750 Gallon Ea. $ 280.00
Infrared Camera - Thermal Imaging Ea. $ 125.00
Matterport Imaging System Ea. $ 350.00
Rescue Mat Panels Ea. $ 49.00
Rescue Mat System, Wood Floor drying system Ea. $ 75.00 Equipment Considerations

1. The listed rates are to be applied to all equipment used in the performance of the work for any calendar day or portion thereof in which the equipment is used.

5. Equipment that is held at the customer’s request, but not in use, will be invoiced at the full daily rate (or weekly rate if applicable to the type of equipment being held). In the event the equipment is from a 3rd party vendor then the equipment will be charged at cost plus 20%.

7. SRM shall invoice the customer for the transportation of equipment and materials to the project, and for the return of equipment and materials back from the project at cost plus 20% for 3rd party vendors. Transportation by SRM staff will be invoiced at the scheduled rates, plus applicable mileage charges.

2. During the course of work, SRM may find it necessary to purchase equipment not scheduled under the Daily Rate. In those situations, the Daily Rate shall be an acceptable industry daily rental rate determined by SRM.

3. The rental rate and associated charges for any item of equipment rented from a third party vendor, used in the performance of the Work, whether it is on the schedule or not, shall be billed at cost plus 20%.

Note: Please note that costs reflect 2024 pricing, and these are reviewed and adjusted annually.

8. Equipment Terms: *Applicable Equipment Terms will be applied based on the following defined rule – Each Piece of Equipment must run for 7 days to qualify for weekly rate and run for 30 days to qualify for Monthly Rate. Weekly rate is 5 x Published Daily Rate and Monthly is 20 x Published Daily rates. The first seven days will not be eligible for terms.

4. If any company owned, leased or rented asset is damaged or rendered unfit for use by the actions or inactions of the customer, its agents or representatives, the customer if negligent, shall be responsible for replacing such asset at their expense.

6. SRM reserves the right to add to the equipment schedule during the course of the work.

Equipment ServiceMaster Recovery Management Initials ________ Page 5

9. Vehicle and Equipment rates do not include cost of fuel, DEF, and preventative maintentance.

Page 58 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1355
Adj. Wrench, 8”, 10”, 12” Generator Aux. Adapter, 220V Scissors Bar, Crow (Small, Large) Fire Extinguisher Scraper, Long Handle Bar, Flat Pry First Aid Kit Shears, Sheet Metal, Hand
Bolt Cutters Flashlight, w/o Batteries Shovel, Scoop
Broom - Corn, Street, Push Fuel Can, Diesel Shovel, Spade Brush, Scrub, 6”, Flat Hammer Shovel, Square
Brush, Scrub, s/ 4” Handle Hammer, Sledge Siphon Pump
Brush, Scrub, w/ 20” Handle Hand Truck Socket Set, 3/8” Brush, Tooth Heater, Electric Sprayer, Pump (Hudson)
Brush, Wire Ice Chest Squeegee, Window and Floor
Buckets Ladders (below 14') Staple Gun
Bulb, Demo Light Layflat Tie / Cord / Twine Table
Chain, 25’ Lengths Lock, Master, #1, #5 Tape Gun
Chairs - folding Lock-Out, Tag-Out Kit Unger Pole w/ Fixi Clamp Chalk and Chalk Line Pallets jacks Washtub
Drill Bit Set MSDS Water Cooler
Drinking Cups Pan, Dust Water Hose - up to 150' per job Extension Cord, 3-Way Plug Putty Knife Water Hose Spray Nozzle Extension Cord Repair Kit – Hose, Airless, Electri. Water Hose Y Connector Fuel Can, Gas Rope, 50”, Nylon / Hemp Screwdrivers
Funnel, Generator Saw, Hand
Funnel, Small Saw, Hack
Small Tools List
The following "small tools" list includes the items listed below. A "Small Tools" charge of 3% is calculated based upon the total billable amount of labor.

Small Tools ServiceMaster Recovery Management Initials ______ Page 6

Page 59 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1356
Q&A Deadline July 15, 2024 5:00 PM (PDT)
Cleaning Services and Biohazardous Waste Cleanup
Set 1 Released via Email 07/18/2024 3:41 PM (PDT) – 10 questions

1.1 Are there any additional documents, other than what the city provided under this sites Documents tab that are required to be signed and provided with our bid submission packet? If so, please list and provide them, or direct us to where they can be found. Thank you.

Answer No additional information is needed at this time.

1.2 On p. 14, #19. Compliance with Laws from the provided Standard Contract PDF- Here it references both prevailing wage and living wage. Would you please confirm is this bid/contract is, or is NOT a prevailing wage bid/contract? I want to ensure I am submitting the correct labor rates.

Answer Contractor shall comply with prevailing wage laws as applicable and the City's Municpal Code Living Wage Ordinance.

1.3 What is the Sq ft. of the following...Police Department, gym, bunk house, and temporary holding facilities. Police Department vehicles, residential areas, commercial areas, vehicles, and open-air public and private areasCrime Scene Tech Room, Property Room, etc.

Answer It can vary. Please submit your price sheet including your fixed price per square foot.

1.4 this bid reacquires bid bond?
Answer Does not apply.

1.5 Will the awarded contractor provide the paper products/toiletries for this project? If yes, what are those products and what is the monthly consumables value?
Answer We provide the paper products and toiletries.

1.6 What is the frequency days, time of the areas to be cleaned? 7/18/24, 3:48 PM Q&A for Cleaning Services and Biohazardous Waste Cleanup https://vendors.planetbids.com/portal/14590/bo/bo-detail/119398# 1/2

Page 60 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1357
Answer On site cleaning services services monthly or as needed. Biohazardous material clean-up on an as needed basis.

1.7 What is the current monthly charge of the current contractor? Answer It varies on departmental needs.

1.8 Who is the current contractor?
Answer Current vendor is Advance Crime Scene Restoration.

1.9 Is this a repeat or new contract? If repeat - who is the incumbent? Per FOIA - please provide a copy of most current pricing including all pricing escalators.

Answer To request a PRA please visit the City of Richmond website and submit a request.

1.10 Is there a pricing sheet or form?
Answer Please submit your price sheet based on the services your organization can provide. 7/18/24, 3:48 PM Q&A for Cleaning Services and Biohazardous Waste Cleanup https://vendors.planetbids.com/portal/14590/bo/bo-detail/119398# 2/2 Francisco Vega- Chief Operating Officer
Date: 7/22/2024

Page 61 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1358
dba ServiceMaster Recovery Management; dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services

Page 62 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1359
Vendor Supplemental Questionnaire Form
Email Back To: @ Fax #:

Requesting Department – Contact Person
Full Legal Name:

Address:

City: State: Zip Code:

If PO Box given, also provide the physical address given to the California State Board of Equalization when applying for a Seller’s Permit.

Street Address:

City: State: Zip Code:

Contact Information
Name:

Telephone # Fax #
Toll Free Telephone # Toll Free Fax #
E-Mail Address: Web Page URL:

Separate payment address (if applicable)
Address:

City: State: Zip Code:

For Sole Proprietors only – Please check the blocks below:

Please, check Yes or No in the two questions below. If the answer to A. is YES, continue to B. If the answer to B. is NO, please provide your Social Security Number if you have not already done so on the W-9.

A. Are you a sole proprietor who will be providing services to the City? Yes No B. Do you have any employees? Yes No
Amount of Contract: ___________ Expiration Date of Contract: ____________ Social Security Number: ______- _____ - _______
Disclosure Statement for Limited Liability Companies
Is your Business a Limited Liability Company (LLC)? Yes No If the owner and/or applicant is an LLC, please complete Disclosure Statement on back.

Requesting Department Staff: Please indicate the type of transactions you are seeking from the vendor:

Goods Services Services / Legal / Lawyer Services / Rent If both Goods and Services = Please indicate which is larger – 51% or more as Goods, or 51% or more as Services.

If COR Employee – Set up as: Medical / Disability Child Support Non-Taxable Reimbursements

Page 63 of 69 ends

Sharjo, LLC dba ServiceMaster Restoration Services 5451 Industrial Way Benicia CA 94510 5451 Industrial Way Benicia CA 94510 Andy Dobbs 415-336-6258 925-288-1570 415-336-6258 925-288-1570 [email protected] www.svmcleaning-restoration.com Same as above Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1360
Disclosure Statement for Limited Liability Companies
Is your Business a Limited Liability Company (LLC)? YES NO If you answered YES, please provide the City with the names and business addresses of any and all shareholders, directors, officers, members, managers, other authorized persons, partners, and “Beneficial Owners” of the applying LLC. A Beneficial Owner is any person or entity who: (1) exercises substantial control over the applying LLC; (2) owns 25% or more of the interest in the applying LLC; or (3) receives substantial economic benefits from the assets of the applying LLC.

If any LLC shareholder, director, officer, member, manager, other authorized person, partner, or Beneficial Owner is itself an LLC or other business entity, the names and business addresses must also be provided for any and all shareholders, directors, officers, members, managers, other authorized persons, partners, and Beneficial Owners of that LLC or other business entity all the way up through each entity in the organizational chart until ultimate ownership by individual person(s) is/are disclosed.

Name: _____________________
Title: _____________________
Address:__________________________________________
Name: _____________________
Title: _____________________
Address:__________________________________________
Name: _____________________
Title: _____________________
Address:__________________________________________
☐ Check this box if additional ownership information is attached to this Disclosure Statement.

In signing this Disclosure Statement, I represent that the information submitted in this Disclosure Statement, and any attachments, is true and correct.

Signature: _____________________
Printed Name: _____________________
Title: _____________________
Date: _____________________

Page 64 of 69 ends

Francisco Vega Chief Operating Officer 195 Mason Cir., Concord, CA 94520 Derek Suech Chief Operating Officer 5451 Industrial Way, Benicia, CA, 94510 Francisco Vega Chief Operating Officer 7/22/2024 Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1361
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements – Type 1:

Consultants and Contractors
Type 1 – Page 1 of 4
Revised: September 2011
In all instances where a CONTRACTOR or its representatives will be conducting business and/or providing services, the City requires the following MINIMUM insurance requirements and limits.

CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract, agreement, or other order for work, services or supplies, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the contract. Failure to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of contract.

CONTRACTOR agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which it has agreed to provide Commercial General Liability insurance, CONTRACTOR shall look solely to its insurance for recovery. CONTRACTOR hereby grants to CITY, on behalf of any insurer providing Commercial General Liability insurance to either CONTRACTOR or CITY with respect to the services of CONSULTANT herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said CONTRACTOR may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Original, signed certificates and original, separate policy endorsements, naming the City as an additional insured for general liability, as well as a waiver of subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance, shall be received and approved by the City before any work may begin. However, failure to do so shall not operate as a waiver of these insurance requirements.

City reserves the right to modify or require additional coverages for specific risk exposures depending on scope of CONTRACTORS work.

Minimum coverage is detailed below. The policy limits of coverage shall be made available to the full limits of the policy.

The minimum limits stated herein shall not serve to reduce the policy limits of coverage of CONTRACTOR.

Minimum Scope of Insurance – the following forms shall be provided and coverage shall be at least as broad as the following:

1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001) including coverage for bodily and personal injury, property damage, and products and completed operations.

2. Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability coverage (ISO Form CA 0001, Code 1, Any Auto)

3. Original and Separate Additional Insured Endorsements for General Liability (ISO Form CG 20 10 11/85 or its equivalent) with primary and non-contributory language.

4. Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California including Employer’s Liability coverage.

5. Original and Separate Waiver of Subrogation for Workers’ Compensation and Builder’s Risk/ Course of Construction Insurance.

6. Builder’s Risk/Course of Construction insurance covering all risks of loss less policy exclusions when the City of Richmond has a financial interest in the property. – (Only required for Construction Contracts involving property)

7. Contractor’s Pollution Liability (if applicable for Construction Contractors) Required Coverage Minimum Limits
Workers’ Compensation and
Employers’ Liability
Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1 million Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease.

If CONTRACTOR is self-insured, provide a certificate of Permission to SelfInsure, signed by the California Department of Industrial Relations and SelfInsurance. If contractor is a sole proprietor (has no employees) than contractor must sign “Contractor Release of Liability” found at:
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

Page 65 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1362
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements – Type 1:

Consultants and Contractors
Type 1 – Page 2 of 4
Revised: September 2011

PROJECT COST REQUIRED LIMIT
$0 - $5 million $2 million p/o
$5 million - $10 million $5 million p/o
Over $10 million $10 million p/o
Fireworks $5 million p/o
General Liability
(primary and excess limits
combined)

Includes coverage for bodily injury, personal injury, property damage and products and completed operations. The policy shall not exclude coverage for XCU perils (explosion, collapse, or damage to underground property).

If the policy includes a general aggregate, either the general aggregate shall apply separately to this project, service or location or the minimum required aggregate limit shall be twice the per occurrence limit ($4 million aggregate limit).

Policy shall be endorsed to name the City of Richmond as an additional insured per the conditions detailed below.

Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.

Builders’ Risk/Course of
Construction – Covers property
under construction, repair or
renovation as well as equipment
and materials to be installed.
(Only required for Construction
Projects involving property and
equipment installation.)
Coverage shall include all risks of direct physical loss, excluding earthquake, for an amount equal to the full completed value of the covered structure or replacement value of alterations or additions, including soft costs and business interruption.

If the project does not involve new or major reconstruction, an Installation Floater may be acceptable. For such projects, a property installation floater shall be obtained that provides for the improvement, remodel, modification, alteration, conversion or adjustment to existing buildings, structures, processes, machinery and equipment. The Property Installation Floater shall provide property damage coverage for any building, structure, machinery or equipment damaged, impaired, broken or destroyed during the performance of the Work, including during transit, installation and testing at the City of Richmond’s site.

The City of Richmond shall be named as loss payee as its interest may appear. The insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against City.

Contractor’s Pollution Liability (if
applicable)
Protects against:
unexpected/unintended release of
pollution resulting from contractors
covered operations such as:

HVAC, paving, carpentry, pipeline
& tank installation, drillers,
remediation contractors,
maintenance, mechanical,
demolition, excavation, grading,
street/road construction,
residential & commercial builders.

Same limits as General Liability.

Required Policy Conditions
A. M. Best Rating A:VII or Better. If the A.M. Best Rating falls below the required rating, CONTRACTOR must replace coverage immediately and provide notice to City.

Additional Insured Endorsement Applicable to General Liability Coverage.

The City of Richmond, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be named as additional insureds for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured, including but not limited to bodily injury, deaths and property damage or destruction arising in any respect directly or indirectly in the performance of this contract.

ISO form CG 20 10 (11/85) or its equivalent is required. The endorsement must not exclude products and completed operations coverage. If it does, then CG 20 37 (10/01) is also required.

Page 66 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1363
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements – Type 1:

Consultants and Contractors
Type 1 – Page 3 of 4
Revised: September 2011
Additional Insured Endorsement
(continued)
SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61
Primary and Noncontributory The contractor’s insurance coverage must be primary coverage as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by the City is wholly separate from the insurance of the contractor and in no way relieves the contractor from its responsibility to provide insurance.

Waiver of Subrogation
Endorsement Form
Contractor’s insurer will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for Workers Compensation and Builder’s Risk/ Course of Construction coverage during the life of this contract.

SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61
Deductibles and Self-Insured
Retentions
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City or the CONTRACTOR shall procure a financial guarantee in an amount equal to the deductible or self-insured retention guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

Contractor is responsible for satisfaction of the deductible and/or self-insured retention for each loss.

Loss Payable Endorsement (only
required when Builder’s Risk
and/or Course of Construction
Insurance is required.)
Applicable to Builder’s Risk/Course of Construction naming the City of Richmond as Loss Payee.

SURETY BONDS
(If a Public Works/Engineering
Project)
The Contractor shall provide:

1. A Bid bond

2. A Performance Bond

3. A Payment Bond
Umbrella/Excess Liability Policies
If an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy is used to meet the liability limits, coverage shall be as broad as specified for underlying coverages and cover those insured in the underlying policies.

Claims-Made Policies
If any insurance policy is written on a claims-made form: 1) the retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 2) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 3) If coverage is canceled or nonrenewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase an extended period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.

Subcontractors
CONTRACTOR shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish to the City for review and approval, separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify the City of Richmond for any damage resulting to it from failure of either CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor to take out or maintain the required insurance policies. The fact that insurance is obtained by CONTRACTOR, and/or CONTRACTOR’s subcontractors, will not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of CONTRACTOR, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this contract. Damages recoverable by CITY from CONTRACTOR or any third party will not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage.

Page 67 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1364
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements – Type 1:

Consultants and Contractors
Type 1 – Page 4 of 4
Revised: September 2011
Verification of Coverage
All original certificates and endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work may begin. The City of Richmond reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies including endorsements affecting the coverage at any time.

Original insurance certificates and required policy endorsements shall be mailed, or delivered to the Designated Project Manager for the City of Richmond.

Insurance certificates and endorsements may be faxed to the Designated Project Manager. However, Contractor must mail the original certificates and endorsements to Designated Project Manager once faxed.

Continuous Coverage
CONTRACTOR shall maintain the required insurance for the life of the contract. Should the CONTRACTOR cease to have insurance as required during this time, all work by the CONTRACTOR pursuant to this agreement shall cease until insurance acceptable to the City is provided. In the event that CONTRACTOR fails to comply with the City’s insurance requirements, the City may take such action as it deems necessary to protect the City’s interests. Such action may include but is not limited to termination of the contract, withholding of payments, or other actions as the City deems appropriate.

If services or the scope of work extend beyond the expiration dates of the required insurance policies initially approved by the City, CONTRACTOR must provide updated certificates and endorsements indicating that the required coverage, terms and conditions are still in place. Renewal certificates and updated endorsements shall be mailed to the Designated Project Manager.

Cancellation
CONTRACTOR shall ensure that coverage shall not be cancelled, reduced or otherwise materially changed except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice has been given to the City.

Reporting Requirements
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

Consistent with Public Policy
The insuring provisions, insofar as they may be judged to be against public policy shall be void and unenforceable only to the minimum extent necessary so that the remaining terms and provisions herein may be consistent with public policy and thus enforceable.

Page 68 of 69 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1365
Docusign Envelope ID: 3EEA7ECC-E421-4753-AFAF-0B10C8CDE0EB 1366

Page 1 of 3 ends

November 19, 2024
Public Works
DATE: November 19, 2024
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, PE, Director of Public Works
Wade Finlinson, Project Manager
Ranjana Maharaj, Deputy Director for Community
Services-Recreation
Stephanie Ny, Associate Administrative Analyst
Subject: Pia Angela Göktürk Bench Donation
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed memorial bench is funded by an in-kind donation valued at approximately $1,500. The donor will purchase the bench directly from the vendor.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The Public Works Department and Community Services
Department are requesting City Council approval of a
memorial bench donation. The memorial bench will be
installed on the Bay Trail near Barbara and Jay Vincent Park.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE the donation of a memorial bench dedicated to Pia Angela Göktürk to be installed on the Bay Trail
near Barbara and Jay Vincent Park – Public Works
Department/Community Services Department (Stephanie
Ny 510-620-6563/Ranjana Maharaj 510-620-6792/Wade
Finlinson 510-621-1301/Daniel Chavarria 510-620-5478)
AGENDA
REPORT
1367

Page 2 of 3 ends

November 19, 2024
DISCUSSION:

On March 12, 2024, the Community Services Department, Recreation Division received an application to donate and dedicate a new memorial bench in honor of Pia Angela Göktürk (Attachment 1). The application was forwarded to the Public Works Department, Parks and Landscaping Division for review. City staff provided the requestor with the standard bench model for memorial bench donations in the Marina Bay Landscaping and Lighting District and approved the proposed bench location (Attachment 2).

At the regular meeting of the Marina Bay Landscaping and Lighting District Board on June 27, 2024, the Board approved donation of the memorial bench dedicated to Pia Angela Göktürk (Attachment 3).

The next steps involve approval from the Recreation and Parks Commission and subsequently from the City Council. However, meetings of the Recreation and Parks Commission were canceled in July, August, September, and October due to a lack of quorum. Following guidance from the City Attorney’s Office, the request is now being submitted directly to the City Council for approval.

The proposed location for the memorial bench is on the Bay Trail, near Barbara and Jay Vincent Park, facing the water (Attachment 4). Approval from the City Council is required prior to the donation and installation of the bench.

Background
Deniz Göktürk, daughter of Pia Angela Göktürk, wishes to donate a memorial bench dedicated to Pia to honor her love for water views. Deniz shares the following information about her late mother and the donation request:

My mother Pia Angela Göktürk passed on March 9, 2020, at the age of 92. She spent the last 8 years of her life with us in El Cerrito, and, at the very end, San Pablo.

The shores of the East Bay were her favorite places to visit, even when she was wheelchair bound, especially Point Richmond and the area around Richmond Marina / Shimada Friendship Park / Rosie the Riveter. Water views always had a special place in her life – in Konstanz, Germany, where she was born in 1927 near the lake of Konstanz and the river Rhein, and Istanbul, Turkey, where she lived and taught for over fifty years, overlooking the waters of the Bosporus. Therefore, we believe she would be best remembered with a memorial bench by the water.

For more information about her, see my essay:
https://transit.berkeley.edu/2022/creative-remembrance-in-traveling-archivesgokturk-transit/ 1368

Page 3 of 3 ends

November 19, 2024
Upon approval from the City Council, the donor will purchase the bench and plaque directly from the vendor. The vendor will ship the bench and plaque to the Parks and Landscaping Division for installation. The donation is valued at approximately $1,500.

The memorial bench will include a plaque that reads:

Pia Angela Göktürk (Lorenzi)
30 Sep 1927 – 9 Mar 2020
Water views remembered…
Bodensee – Bosporus – Bay
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Application to Dedicate a Memorial Bench to Pia Angela Göktürk.

Attachment 2 – Memorial Bench Location
Attachment 3 – Marina Bay Landscaping and Lighting District Board Approval Attachment 4 – Bench and Plaque Photos
1369
1 City of Richmond
Community Service Department/Recreation and Neighborhood Services Division Parks and Landscaping Division

POLICY AND APPLICATION FOR NAMING OR RE-NAMING OF PARKS,

FACILITIES, AND STREETS
***NOTE: RED IS TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT

BLUE DENOTES ADDITIONAL PROCEDURAL OR EXPLANATORY NOTES STATEMENT OF POLICY AND GUIDELINES:

This application form is used in conjunction with the Statement of Policy and Guidelines for Naming and Renaming or acquiring monument “kiosks” or benches of commemoration honoring families or luminaries and friends of Richmond. These Guidelines may be found on the below link:
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/57679/2021---Renaming-Procedures-for-ParksFacilities-or-Streets STEP 1 - TYPE OF REQUEST (Check one of the following):
_____ 1. Donating and dedication of new park benches, tables, and monuments. (X) _____ 2. Temporary memorials on public thoroughfares or city property for up to 90 days. _____ 3. Naming or re-naming of parks, facilities, and streets. _____ 4. Naming or re-naming of overpass walkways, observation overlooks as well as subsets of parks or facilities (e.g. auditoriums or other rooms within a named facility, Baseball diamond or other individual field(s) within a named park).

STEP 2 – CLASSIFICATION OF REQUEST (Check of the following):
_____ 1. Recognition of a loved one’s name as a gift is given to the city such as a new bench or table for a neighborhood park or a new garden for a Richmond designated park that will be enjoyed by all Richmond residents and guests. (X)
_____ 2. Recognition of special civic or monetary contribution to the city by a group or individual.
_____ 3. Recognition of a person or group living or having lived in the city of Richmond who have received recognition on a local, national, or international level thereby bringing honor to the City of Richmond (local heroes).
_____ 4. Those brave individuals who have lost their lives during their service to the City of Richmond.
1370
2 STEP 3 – APPLICANT INFORMATION (Fill in each of the following items):

Applicant Name: Deniz Göktürk________________________________________ Street _________________________________________
City, State, Zip _________________________________________ Phone home_______________ cell _______office_______________ Best time to reach: From 9 am or leave message or email ________________ E-mail ________________________________________
• Location of request (be specific if within a park or existing facility):

Shimada Friendship Park, Barbara and Jay Vincent Park, Marina Bay Park, or anywhere along the Richmond waterfront with a nice water view
______________________________________________________________________ • Specific area or room within the park or facility (if appropriate):
_______________________________________________________________________ Rationale:

My mother Pia Angela Göktürk passed on March 9, 2020, at age the age of 92. She spent the last 8 years of her life with us in El Cerrito, and, at the very end, San Pablo.

The shores of the East Bay were her favorite places to visit, even when she was wheelchair bound, especially Point Richmond and the area around Richmond Marina / Shimada Friendship Park / Rosie the Riveter. Water views always had a special place in her life – in Konstanz, Germany, where she was born in 1927 near the lake of Konstanz and the river Rhein, and Istanbul, Turkey, where she lived and taught for over fifty years, overlooking the waters of the Bosporus. Therefore, we believe she would be best remembered with a memorial bench by the water. For more information about her see my essay:
https://transit.berkeley.edu/2022/creative-remembrance-in-traveling-archives-gokturk-transit/ Wording for Plaque:

Remembering Pia Angela Göktürk (born Lorenzi), 30 September 1927 to 9 March 2020. She loved water views – from Bodensee to Bosporus to the Bay…
_____________________________________________________________________________________ STEP 4 – SIGN, DATE, AND SUBMIT YOUR REQUEST:

1. Complete a petition of the residential and business owners on the street where the proposed name change is requested with names and signatures.

2. Submit to:

Via Email: [email protected]
Via Mail: Community Services-Recreation, 3230 Macdonald Avenue, Richmond, CA 94804 Date of Submission March 12, 2024 ____ Signature of Requestor 1371
3 Once a request is received by the Community Services-Recreation Division, your request will be reviewed for further consideration. Any request for a new park, capital improvements to any facility, and a name change for any facility will be discussed with the Police, Fire, Public Works, Planning and any other departments that may be necessary. The City of Richmond’s Municipal Code will be checked for compliance before further processing.

Upon recommendation by Department Heads, the request will be submitted for review and approval by the Recreation & Parks Commission. Upon their approval, the request will then require City Council approval before final actions can be taken.

APPLICANT - COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING STEPS AFTER SUBMITTING THE ABOVE

APPLICATION
STEP 5- PRESENTATION TO RECREATION AND PARKS COMMISSION:

1. Present your request to your local Neighborhood Council. Ask for a vote of approval and letter from them. For a contact list of Neighborhood Councils, click on the below link:

City of Richmond Neighborhood Councils_2021-08-17.xlsx

2. Conduct a walk through with the Parks and Landscaping Division staff at the desired site, if applicable to a park facility.

3. Submit the approval letter of support from your local Neighborhood Council to Community Services-Recreation to request a date to present to the Recreation and Parks Commission:

Via email at [email protected] OR drop off at Community Services-Recreation’s Registration Office at 3230 Macdonald Avenue, Richmond, CA. To contact the Registration Office, call (510) 620-6793.

4. Acquire sponsorship of a City Official or City Department.

STEP 6 – RESOLUTION OF INTENT:

If approved by the Recreation and Parks Commission, work with your City Official or City Department sponsor to place this item on the City Council agenda, to adopt a Resolution of Intent and to schedule a Public Hearing.

This action is taken in order to:
o Notice residents, businesses, and property owners of the Resolution of Intent and Public Hearing date (Note: All costs incurred for postage shall be the burden of the individual group or organization submitting the proposed name.) o Notify the postmaster and/or all local post offices of Resolution of Intent and Public Hearing
o Consult with City Clerk to determine a date for the Public Hearing and request public notice disseminated 10 days prior to the scheduled Public Hearing o Request a response from Richmond Police Department and Richmond Fire Department about possible safety issues that may arise due to the proposed name change o Request a response and cost analysis from Public Works 1372
4 Attachments needed for this Agenda Item
▪ Minutes from the Recreation and Parks Commission Meeting ▪ Redacted application to request the name change
▪ Map of area
▪ Resolution of Intent
Date of Public Hearing: Not Applicable
STEP 7 – PUBLIC HEARING:

Work with your City Official or City Department sponsor to place this item on the City Council agenda to Hold a Public Hearing and adopt a resolution to change the name This action is taken in order to:
o Acquire an approved Resolution to indicate background, steps taken, authority of the council and direction to further notice Public Works to execute. o Allow the City Clerk to notice appropriate agencies
Attachments needed for this Agenda Item
▪ Minutes from the City Council meeting adopting the Resolution of Intent, if available
▪ Minutes from the Recreation and Parks Commission Meeting ▪ Map of Area
▪ Resolution authorizing the name change
Outcome of Hearing: Not Applicable APPROVED / DENIED
STEP 8 – FINAL STEPS WITH PUBLIC WORKS:

Contact the Public Works Department for payment and execution of the required actions:
• Parks Division (510) 231-3004 – to pay vendors directly for the costs of materials. • Streets Division (510) 231-3011 - for installation of signs. 1373
1374

MEMORANDUM
Parks Maintenance Landscaping Division
3201 Leona Avenue
Richmond, CA 94804
Tel: (510) 231-3004 Fax: (510) 231-3072
DATE: June 27, 2024
TO: Stephanie Ny, Program Manager
FROM: Greg Hardesty, Parks & Landscaping Superintendent SUBJECT: Pia Angela Gokturk Memorial Bench Donation
At the June 20, 2024, meeting of the Marina Bay Landscaping and Lighting District Board, the board approved the application to donate a memorial bench dedicated to Pia Angela Gokturk to be installed along the Bay Trail near Barbara and Jay Vincent Park. 1375
Silhouette Bench
Color: Cedar
Mount Type: Inground Mount
Length: 6’
https://www.barcoproducts.com/silhouette-benches
1376
1377
Cast Bronze Bench Plaque
Size: 10.5”w x 3”h
https://www.barcoproducts.com/cast-bronze-bench-plaques 1378

Page 1 of 4 ends

November 19, 2024
Public Works
DATE: November 19, 2024
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, PE, Public Works Director
Robert Armijo, PE, Deputy Director Public Works / City
Engineer
Mubeen Qader, Deputy Director Finance
Wendy Wellbrock, PE, Senior Civil Engineer
Subject: Appropriation of $4,100,000 for the Revitalizing the Historic Main Library Project (Main Library Project).

FINANCIAL IMPACT: Additional appropriation from the General Fund of $4,100,000.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

October 4, 2022
May 16, 2023
May 28, 2024
October 1, 2024

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The Main Library Project was initially estimated to cost approximately $30 million. However, cost estimates
developed during the programming and design phases
have exceeded this initial figure. To fund essential
building improvements, the project now requires an
additional $4.1 million in funding.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution to appropriate $4,100,000 from the General Fund to the General Capital Fund to the
Revitalizing the Historic Main Library Project – Public Works (Daniel Chavarria 510-620-5478/Wendy Wellbrock
510-307-8108).

AGENDA
REPORT
1379

Page 2 of 4 ends

November 19, 2024
DISCUSSION:

Summary
The Main Library Project, initiated in 2022 with multiple funding sources and an original estimate of approximately $30 million, now faces a $4.1 million funding gap due to higher-than-anticipated costs identified during the design phase. City staff requests an additional appropriation from the General Fund to cover the anticipated funding shortfall in the project.

Background
The Richmond Main Library building opened in 1949 as part of the historic Richmond Civic Center. The building was not included in the 2009 renovation of other Civic Center facilities, and instead pursued statewide library construction funding for a new library building through Proposition 81. Proposition 81 failed to pass and no statewide funds were available to fund much-needed improvements at the Main Library. Since then, significant deferred maintenance of the Main Library has resulted in missing floor tiles, fraying carpet, non-functioning single-pane windows, an inadequate electrical system, and unhealthy interior air quality during adverse air quality events.

In October 2022 the California State Library awarded a $9.7 million grant to the City of Richmond. The City of Richmond appropriated 50 percent matching funds to create an almost $15 million budget to address critical life-safety and maintenance issues in the historic Main Library.

The City staff is committed to improving the Main Library so that it remains the jewel that it was when it was originally constructed. This includes the repair and upgrading of building systems and structures, many of which have not been improved since the building was constructed in 1949. The proposed project, initially conceived with an estimated cost of approximately $30 million, includes funding to enhance the library’s accessibility, sustainability, and safety. At the time of the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) adoption, the project faced an estimated $15 million funding shortfall.

In May 2023 the City Council appropriated an additional $15 million to create opportunities for further renovations of the Main Library building.

The proposed work includes but is not limited to:
 Upgrading of public and staff restrooms to make them ADA accessible  Replacement of acoustical ceilings to reduce noise
 Installing improved lighting and controls throughout the building  Replacing asbestos-containing floor tiles with new resilient flooring  Replacement of the existing electrical power system
1380

Page 3 of 4 ends

November 19, 2024
 Installation of a new HVAC system; installation of a new fire alarm and sprinkler system
 Providing safety and accessibility improvements to the library entrance  Replacement of the existing staff-only elevator with a new ADA compliant elevator accessible to the public
 Replacement of existing windows throughout the building with new energyefficient windows  Seismic upgrades to increase the safety of the building in an earthquake.

The approximately $30 million project is currently funded through a combination of a State Grant, American Rescue Plan Act funds, General Capital Fund, and Developer Impact Fees, as shown in the table below.

Funding Source Amount
State Grant 9,712,979
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 2,258,113
General Capital Fund 16,898,377
Developer Impact Fee Fund 1,064,188
Total 29,933,657
Additional Appropriation Request
Between October 2023 and June 2024, cost estimates for the design plans exceeded the available funding. Addressing additional structural and system issues within the building is estimated to cost approximately $4.1 million. This additional funding will cover the following improvements:
 Replacing the roof - the roof is 15 years old and leaks. A major renovation to the building without replacing a roof that is nearing its lifespan may be a disservice to the community and not recommended for a long-term solution.  Replacing the photovoltaic system (solar panels) - the panels are not working properly and need to be replaced.
 Upgrading the generator - the current generator cannot power the Library building during power outages due to capacity limitation and requires upsizing to meet the Library electricity needs and support the building as a resiliency center.  New trash enclosure - building a dedicated trash enclosure will help with keeping the facility clean. Currently there is no trash closure for the building.  Water proofing in the basement - the Library has a tunnel/crawl space around the perimeter of the building which connects to a central basement location under the building. Improving the water proofing system will mitigate and prevent water damage.
1381

Page 4 of 4 ends

November 19, 2024
 Exterior Cleaning and Patchwork – gentle cleaning methods and techniques will prevent damage to the historic building and improve the overall finish look of the project.

City staff believes that the additional funding for the project will help deliver a modern, structurally durable, and environmentally sustainable Library building to the community.

Next Steps
The Main Library Project is planned to go in construction phase in the summer of 2025 and completion is expected around the spring of 2027. Library operations will be relocated to a temporary facility during the construction phase. Staff will continue to provide updates to the City Council as the project moves forward.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

ATTACHMENT 1 - RESOLUTION
1382
DocID #30744v1
RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROPRIATE $4,100,000 TOWARDS REVITALIZING THE HISTORIC RICHMOND MAIN

LIBRARY PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond has started to implement the project entitled “Revitalizing the Historic Richmond Main Library”; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond has originally estimated costs to implement the project at $29,933,657; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond has identified a project shortfall to fund critical improvements to the building; and
WHEREAS, the project currently requires additional funds estimated in the amount of $4,100,000; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond has identified the General Fund as the funding source for the additional costs; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Richmond, appropriates $4,100,000 from the General fund into the General Capital Fund for the Revitalizing the Historic Richmond Main Library project as follows:

Item Amount
General Fund (Transfer Out) ($4,100,000)
General Capital Fund (Transfer In) $4,100,000
General Capital Fund (Revitalizing the Historic Richmond Main Library) $4,100,000 I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a _________ meeting held on ______________ by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:
____________________________________________
Clerk of the City of Richmond
(SEAL)
1383
DocID #30744v1
Approved:
________________________________________
Mayor
Approved as to form:
_______________________________________
City Attorney
1384

Page 1 of 3 ends

November 19, 2024
Public Works
DATE: November 19, 2024
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, Director of Public Works
Tawfic Halaby, Deputy Director of Public Works –
Operations & Maintenance
Clarence Johnson, Senior Electrician
Subject: Resolution to Approve a Contract with Fonroche Lighting America to provide Solar Lighting.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed expenditure of an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 for the duration of the three-year contract and an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 for the entire
duration of the two optional one-year extensions will be funded from the approved fiscal years Public Works
budget (Account String: 01232531-400540). Additional
account strings will be defined in responsible
departments budget as needed.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

Not applicable

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The Facilities Maintenance Division is requesting City
Council to adopt a resolution approving a three-year
contract with two optional one-year extensions, with
Fonroche Lighting America for the installation of Solar Lighting in areas vulnerable to theft and vandalism.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution to award a three-year contract for $3,000,000 with Fonroche Lightning America beginning
November 25, 2024, and ending on November 24, 2027,
with two optional one-year extensions for a total amount of $2,000,000 for both option years, for the installation of AGENDA
REPORT
1385

Page 2 of 3 ends

November 19, 2024
solar lighting - Public Works Department (Clarence
Johnson 510-231-3033/Daniel Chavarria 510-620-
5478/Tawfic Halaby 510-620-5482).

DISCUSSION:

Background
The current streetlights within the City of Richmond are LED light fixtures attached to twenty-five and thirty-foot poles. Streetlights are maintained by City electrical staff.

Maintenance is provided by staff from requests submitted by residents due to lighting being out or other issues. At present, there are currently over 11,000 streetlights operated throughout the City. Of this number, there are over 200 streetlights within the city that are inactive (not working) due to vandalism of wire.

Maintenance of streetlights which fall victim of wire theft/vandalism is costing the City thousands of dollars each year. For each vandalized streetlight, the City spends an amount from $5,000 to $10,000 for repair costs which include labor and materials.

Likewise, the time that a city electrical staff spends on vandalism repair reduces the amount of time and resources necessary for other City maintenance issues. Moreover, the City also uses external electrical contractors to aid in streetlight vandalism repairs when the maintenance work required by specific situations cannot be handled by City electrical staff for either being too complex or when manpower is limited. The use of outside contractors is more costly than using internal electrical staff.

Analysis
It is in line with the issue on the maintenance of streetlights that the Public Works Department intends to put up a solar lighting project in the City of Richmond. Solar lighting systems are independent of the electrical grid and do not require wiring. This eliminates the primary targets for theft, significantly reducing the risk of vandalism and associated costs. Solar lights can be installed in areas that may lack accessible power sources, such as parks, remote locations, or areas prone to wire thefts.

Choosing a solar lighting solution in areas vulnerable to wire theft and vandalism presents a practical and effective approach for the City. The elimination of wiring minimizes the risk of wire thefts, reduces maintenance costs, enhances safety and provides flexibility in installation. Furthermore, the community and environmental benefits align with modern urban development goals, making solar lighting not only a secure choice but also a forward-thinking solution for public illumination. In this regard, the City is intent on securing a solar streetlight manufacturer. 1386

Page 3 of 3 ends

November 19, 2024
Rather than initiating a new procurement process, City of Richmond is proposing to utilize a piggyback procurement method, which is permitted under California Public Contract Code Section 20118 and Richmond Municipal Code section 2.52.330.

Piggyback procurement allows one public agency to leverage an existing competitively bid contract from another agency, provided that the procurement process complied with all applicable laws, and the services being procured are substantially similar to the services already covered in the existing contract. This method helps reduce costs, streamline the procurement process, and expedite service delivery while ensuring competitive pricing and compliance with public procurement requirements.

The League of Oregon Cities/NPPGov has a Master Price Agreement with Fonroche Lighting America dated February 28, 2024. By piggybacking on The League of Oregon Cities’ agreement/contract with Fonroche Lighting America, Richmond can efficiently secure the necessary services without a new competitive bidding process.

As noted above, this contract is in compliance with the Richmond Municipal Code Section 2.52.330 Piggyback procurement which allows for a “piggyback” purchase using another agency’s purchase contract if it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City of Richmond.

Conclusion
Therefore, staff requests that the City Council adopt the resolution to award a three-year contract with Fonroche Lighting America beginning on November 25, 2024 and ending on November 24, 2027, with two optional one-year extensions in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 for the three-year contract and an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 for the duration of the two optional one-year extensions with the City Manager’s approval.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Contract
Attachment 3 – Piggyback Approval Form
1387
Reso. No. XX-24

Page 1 of 3 ends

DocID #30672v1DocID #30672v1
Formatted: Font: 8 pt
RESOLUTION NO. __-__

A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH FONROCHE LIGHTING AMERICA TO PROVIDE SOLAR LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FOR A THREE (3) YEAR PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 25, 2024 TO NOVEMBER 24, 2027, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,000,000.00 OVER THE THREE (3) YEAR TERM WITH TWO

ONE-YEAR OPTIONS TO EXTEND IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$2,000,000.00 FOR THE DURATION OF BOTH EXTENSION YEARS

WHEREAS, the City of Richmond recognizes the need for improved street lightning to enhance safety, visibility, and energy efficiency within our community; and WHEREAS, the use of solar lightning technology is an environmentally friendly initiative that reduces reliance on non-renewable energy sources and lowers operating costs; and WHEREAS, the installation of solar streetlights in parks, parking lots and roadways will contribute to the reduction of carbon emissions and promote sustainability in our community; and WHEREAS, the use of solar streetlights shall address the issue ofn theft and vandalism that has plagued the streetlights within the City; and
WHEREAS, the maintenance and repair of solar streetlights to be installed within the City has a lesser cost in both materials and labor; and
WHEREAS, the selection of Fonroche Lighting America is based on the piggyback procurement method, utilizing the existing agreement awarded to Fonroche Lighting America by the League of Oregon Cities through a competitive bidding process; and WHEREAS, the piggyback procurement is aligned to the Richmond Municipal Code Section 2.52.330; and
WHEREAS, the contract with Fonroche Lighting America would be for an amount not to exceed $3,000,000.00 for a three-year term (November 25, 2024 to November 24, 2027) with two one-year options to extend and appropriatewith an additional amount not to exceed $2,000,000 .00 for the full term of the extension.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richmond that a contract with Fonroche Lighting America is approved for the purchase of solar light fixtures and poles for a period of three years, from November 25, 2024, through November 24, 2027, with a total expenditure not to exceed $3,000,000.00. This contract includes two one-year extension options, at the City's discretion, with an additional amount not to exceed $2,000,000.00 for the full term of the extension.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the two one-year extension options with an additional amount not to exceed $2,000,000.00 for the full term of the two extensions.
*********************
Commented [SM1]: I do not see an appropriation
request in the staff report - should that be
added?
Commented [JA2R1]: No appropriation from GF.

I deleted the word to avoid confusion.
1388
Reso. No. XX-24

Page 2 of 3 ends

DocID #30672v1DocID #30672v1
Formatted: Font: 8 pt
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held November 19, 2024[enter date], by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

PAMELA CHRISTIAN

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

EDUARDO MARTINEZ
Mayor
Approved as to form:

DAVE ALESHIRE
City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. XX-XX, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on November 19, 2024 [enter date].

Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
1389
Reso. No. XX-24

Page 3 of 3 ends

DocID #30672v1DocID #30672v1
Formatted: Font: 8 pt
CLERK’S

CERTIFICATE
I, Pamela Christian, City Clerk of the City of Richmond, do hereby certify as follows:

The foregoing resolution is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. XX-XX duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City duly and regularly held at the regular meeting place thereof on the [X day of Month Year], of which meeting all the members of said City Council had due notice and at which a majority thereof were present; and that at said meeting said resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

An agenda of said meeting was posted before said meeting at City Hall, 450 Civic Center Plaza in the City of Richmond, California, a location freely accessible to members of the public, and a brief description of said resolution appeared on said agenda.

I have carefully compared the foregoing with the original on file and of record in my office, and the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted at said meeting.

Said resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adoption and the same is now in full force and effect.

Dated: , 2024.

City Clerk of the City of Richmond
[SEAL]
1390

CITY OF RICHMOND

STANDARD CONTRACT
Department: City Project Manager:

City Project Manager E-mail: City Project Manager Phone No:

Vendor No: Contract No:

Description of Services:

The parties to this STANDARD CONTRACT do mutually agree and promise as follows:

1. Parties. The parties to this Contract are the City of Richmond, a municipal corporation (“the City”), and the following named Contractor:

Contractor Name:

Street Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

Contact Person:

Telephone: Email:

Business License No:
☐ A California corporation, ☐ limited liability corporation ☐ general partnership, ☐ limited partnership, ☐ individual, ☐ non-profit corporation, ☐ individual dba as [specify:] ____________________ ☐ other [specify:] _______________________________

2. Term. The effective date of this Contract is _______________________ and terminates _________________ unless terminated earlier as set forth herein.

3. Payment Limit. City’s total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $______________ (“Contract Payment Limit”) unless a Contract Amendment has been approved by the City Council or City Manager. If this amount includes a contingency, Contractor acknowledges that any use of such contingency shall be for work beyond the original scope of services and requires prior written authorization by the City. If noted below, Compensation for work done under this Contract, shall not exceed as follows:

FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________ FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________ FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________

4. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor agrees to perform all work at its own cost and expense, to furnish all labor, tools, equipment, materials, except as otherwise specified, in accordance with the Service Plan set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

5. City Obligations. City shall make payments to the Contractor in accordance with the Payment Provisions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Public Works Clarence Johnson [email protected] (510) 231-3033 16678 Provide Solar Light Fixtures and Poles to be installed throughout the City.

Fonroche Lighting America 4900 David Strickland Rd. Fort Worth Texas 76119 Ryan Lortie (925) 321-9951 [email protected] C Corporation November 25, 2024 November 24, 2027 3,000,000.00 1391

6. Authorized Representatives and Notices. This Contract is subject to the Authorized Representatives and Notices Provisions (Exhibit C), attached hereto and incorporated herein.

7. General Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions (Exhibit D), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

8. Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the Special Conditions (Exhibit E) (if any), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

9. Insurance Provisions. This Contract is subject to the Insurance Provisions (Exhibit F), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

10. Sanctuary City Compliance Statement. This Contract is subject to the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement (Exhibit G), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.

11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto:

CITY OF RICHMOND,
a municipal corporation [BUSINESS NAME]
(* The Corporation Chairperson of the Board, President, or Vice President should sign below)
By: _________________________ By: ___________________________ Title: ________________________ Title: __________________________ Date Signed: _________________ Date Signed: ___________________ I hereby certify that this Contract (* The Corporation Chief Financial Officer or Assistant has been approved by City Council Treasurer, or Secretary or Assistant Secretary should or the City Manager. sign below)
By: _________________________ By: ___________________________ City Clerk Title: __________________________
Date Signed: ____________________
Approved as to form:
(NOTE: Pursuant to California Corporations Code Section By: _________________________ 313, if Contractor is a corporation or nonprofit organization, City Attorney this Contract (1) must be signed by (a) the Chairperson of the Board, President, or Vice-President and (b) the
Chief Financial Officer or Assistant Treasurer, or
Secretary or Assistant Secretary)
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:

Service Plan Exhibit A
Payment Provisions Exhibit B
Authorized Representatives and Notices Exhibit C
General Conditions Exhibit D
Special Conditions Exhibit E
Insurance Provisions Exhibit F
Sanctuary City Compliance Statement Exhibit G
Fonroche Lighting America
1392
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT A

SERVICE PLAN
Contractor shall, to the satisfaction of the Project Manager (set forth in Exhibit B), perform the following services and be compensated as outlined below [or attach service plan if necessary]:

Fonroche Lighting America
Installation and maintenance of solar lighting for streetlights in the City of Richmond. 1393
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT PROVISIONS

1. COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR:
a. Provided Contractor is not in default under this Contract, Contractor shall be compensated in the manner set forth herein.
b. All payments made pursuant to this Contract shall be subject to the Contract Payment Limit. The Payment Limit includes expenses (phones, photocopying, meals and travel, etc.). Invoices shall be adequately detailed, based on accurate records, and be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City. Contractor may be required to provide back-up material upon request. c. All City vendors receiving new contracts shall sign up to receive electronic payments through the City’s Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) payments service/provider.

2. SUBMISSION OF INVOICES:

Contractor shall submit timely invoices by email to
[email protected] and/or to the following address:

Attention: City of Richmond Finance/Account Payable
Project Manager: _______________________
P.O. Box 4046
Richmond, CA 94804

3. All invoices that are submitted by Contractor shall be subject to the approval of the City Project Manager, _______________________, before payments shall be authorized.
a. The City will pay invoice(s) within 45 days after completion of services to the City’s satisfaction. The City shall not pay late fees or interest.
b. All appropriate permits, certificates, and licenses, including a City business license shall be obtained and maintained for the duration of this Contract before any payment is authorized.

4. All insurance coverage required by this Contract shall be provided by the Contractor before this Contract is executed by the City. The insurance coverage required by this Contract shall be maintained by Contractor for the duration of this Contract and must be in place before any payment is authorized.

Clarence Johnson Clarence Johnson Fonroche Lighting America 1394
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT C

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES AND NOTICES

1. All required written notices shall be delivered: (i) by hand; or (ii) sent by registered, express, or certified mail, with return receipt requested or with delivery confirmation requested from the U.S. postal service; or (iii) sent by overnight or same day courier service at the party’s respective address listed in this Section.

2. Each notice shall be deemed to have been received on the earlier to occur of:
actual delivery or the date on which delivery is refused; or three (3) days after notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or with a courier service in the manner described above (Sundays and City holidays excepted).

3. Either party may, at any time, change its notice address (other than to a post office box address) by giving the other party three (3) days prior written notice of the new address.

4. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from Contractor to the City shall be addressed to the City at:

City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Email: ________________________________________________

5. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from the City to Contractor shall be addressed to Contractor at:

Attn:

Email: ________________________________________________ Clarence Johnson [email protected] Fonroche Lighting America Fonroche Lighting America 4900 David Strickland Rd. Fort Worth Texas 76119 [email protected] 1395
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT D

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. INDEPENDENT PARTIES:

Contractor hereby declares that Contractor is engaged as an independent business and Contractor agrees to perform the services as an independent contractor.

The manner and means of conducting the services and tasks are under the control of Contractor except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the express terms of this Contract. No civil service status or other right of employment will be acquired by virtue of Contractor’s services. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including but not limited to unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation plans, vacation and sick leave, are available from the City to Contractor, its employees or agents. Deductions shall not be made for any state or federal taxes, FICA payments, PERS payments, or other purposes normally associated with an employer-employee relationship from any compensation due to Contractor. Payments of the above items, if required, are the responsibility of Contractor.

2. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE:

Contractor and the City agree that time is of the essence regarding the performance of this Contract.

3. STANDARD OF CARE:

Contractor agrees to perform all services hereunder in a manner commensurate with the prevailing standards of like professionals or service Contractors, as applicable, in the San Francisco Bay Area and agrees that all services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by the City.

4. IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT (IRCA):

Contractor assumes all responsibility for verifying the identity and employment authorization of all of its employees performing work hereunder, pursuant to all applicable IRCA or other federal, or state rules and regulations. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from and against any loss, damage, liability, costs or expenses arising from any noncompliance of this provision by Contractor.

5. NON-DISCRIMINATION:

Consistent with the City’s policy and state and federal law that harassment and discrimination are unacceptable conduct, Contractor and its employees, contractors, and agents shall not harass or discriminate against any job applicant, City employee, or any other person on the basis of any kind of any statutorily (federal, state or local) protected class, including but not limited to: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, Fonroche Lighting America
1396
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
disability (both mental and physical) including HIV and AIDS, medical condition (e.g. cancer), genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, pregnancy, political affiliation, military and veteran status or legitimate union activities. Contractor agrees that any violation of this provision shall constitute a material breach of this Contract.

6. CITY PROPERTY:
a. Each and every report, draft, work product, map, record, applicable plans, drawings, calculation, data, specification, video, graphic, or any other material or document produced, prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor pursuant to or in connection with this Contract shall be the exclusive property of the City. b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Contractor shall not be obligated to provide to City proprietary software or data which Contractor has developed or had developed for Contractor's own use; provided, however, that Contractor shall, pursuant to Section 11 below, indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from and against any discovery or Public Records Act request seeking the disclosure of such proprietary software or data. c. No report, information or other data given to or prepared or assembled by Contractor pursuant to this Contract shall be made available to any individual or organization by Contractor without prior approval of the City Manager or their designee. d. Contractor shall, at such time and in such form as City Manager or their designee may require, furnish reports concerning the status of services and tasks required under this Contract.

7. RECORDS:
a. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the services, tasks, work, documents and data in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of Contractor’s performance under the Contract, as well as maintain books and records related to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by the City that relate to the performance of the services and tasks under this Contract (collectively the “Records”).
b. All Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the Records to the representatives of the City or its designees during regular business hours upon reasonable prior notice. The City has the right to examine and audit the Records, and to make copies or transcripts therefrom as necessary, and to allow inspection of all proceedings and activities related to this Contract. Such Records, together with supporting documents, shall be kept separate from other documents and records and shall be maintained by Contractor for a period of five (5) years after receipt of final payment.

Fonroche Lighting America
1397
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
c. If supplemental examination or audit of the Records is necessary due to concerns raised by the City’s preliminary examination or audit of records, and the City’s supplemental examination or audit of the records discloses a failure to adhere to appropriate internal financial controls, or other breach of this Contract or failure to act in good faith, then Contractor shall reimburse the City for all reasonable costs and expenses associated with the supplemental examination or audit.

8. PERMITS AND LICENSES:

Contractor, at its sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Contract, all appropriate permits, certificates and licenses, including a City business license, required in connection with the performance of the services and tasks hereunder.

The failure to obtain such permits and licenses shall be a material breach of this Contract and grounds for immediate termination by City; provided, however, that City may waive the business license requirement in writing under unusual or extraordinary circumstances without necessitating any modification of this Contract to reflect such waiver.

9. TERMINATION:
a. Termination Without Default. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the City may, in its sole and absolute discretion and without cause, terminate this Contract at any time prior to completion by Contractor of the project or services hereunder immediately upon transmission of written notice to Contractor as provided in Exhibit C “Authorized Representatives and Notices”.
b. Termination in the Event of Default. Should Contractor fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, within the time and in the manner provided or otherwise violate any of the terms of this Contract, City may immediately terminate this Contract by giving written notice of such termination, stating the reasons for such termination. Contractor shall be compensated as provided in Exhibit B; provided, however, there shall be deducted from such amount the amount of damage, including attorney's fees, expert witness fees and costs, if any, sustained by City by virtue of Contractor's breach of this Contract. Additionally, in the event of such termination, the City may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses.

10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

Contractor acknowledges, represents and warrants that Contractor shall avoid all conflicts of interest (as defined under any federal, state or local statute, rule or regulation, or at common law) with respect to this Contract. Contractor further acknowledges, represents and warrants that no City official or employee has any economic interest, as defined in Title 2, California Code of Regulations §§ 18703.1 through 18703.5, with Contractor that would invalidate this Contract. Contractor acknowledges that in the event that Contractor shall be found by any judicial or administrative body to have any conflict of interest (as defined above) with respect to this Contract, all consideration received under Fonroche Lighting America
1398
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
this Contract shall be forfeited and returned to City forthwith. This provision shall survive the termination of this Contract for one (1) year.

11. HOLD HARMLESS:
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend (with counsel acceptable to the City) and hold harmless the City, its City Council, boards, commissions, officials, employees, agents and volunteers (“Indemnitees”) from and against any and all loss, damages, liability, obligations, claims, suits, judgments, costs and expenses whatsoever, including attorney’s fees and costs of litigation (“Claims”), arising from or in any manner connected to Contractor’s performance of its obligations under this Contract or failure to comply with any of its obligations under this Contract or out of the operations conducted by Contractor even if the City is found to have been negligent. If the Claims filed against Indemnitees allege negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct on the part of Contractor, Contractor shall have no right of reimbursement against Indemnitees for the costs of defense even if negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct is not found on the part of Contractor. Contractor shall not have any obligations to indemnify Indemnitees if the loss or damage is found to have resulted solely from the negligence or the willful misconduct of the City. The defense and indemnification obligations of this Contract are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Contract. b. This indemnification obligation shall survive this Contract and shall not be limited by any term of any insurance policy required under this Contract; provided however, that if this Contract is for design professional services, this indemnity provision is limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the design professional (as defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8).

12. LIMITATIONS UPON SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENT:
a. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract and shall not assign this Contract, nor any portion hereof or monies due or to become due, without the prior written consent of the City Council or its designee.
b. Contractor shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Contract, or any interest therein, directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise, without prior written consent of the City Manager. Contractor shall submit a written request for consent to transfer to the City Manager at least thirty (30) days in advance of the desired transfer.

The City Manager or their designee may consent or reject such request in their sole and absolute discretion. Any attempt to do so without said consent shall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. However, claims for Fonroche Lighting America
1399
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
money against the City under this Contract may be assigned by Contractor to a bank, trust company or other financial institution without prior written consent. c. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Contractor (if applicable), or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member if Contractor is a partnership or jointventure or syndicate, which shall result in a change of control of Contractor, shall be deemed an assignment. For this purpose, control shall mean fifty percent or more of the voting power or twenty-five percent or more of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint-venture.
d. Only those persons and/or businesses whose names and resumés are attached to this Contract shall be used in the performance of this Contract. However, if after the start of this Contract, Contractor wishes to use sub-contractors, at no additional costs to the City, then Contractor shall submit a written request for consent to add subcontractors including the names of the sub-contractors and the reasons for the request to the City Manager at least five (5) days in advance. The City Manager may consent or reject such requests in their sole and absolute discretion. e. Each sub-contractor shall be required to furnish proof of workers’ compensation insurance and shall also be required to carry general, automobile and professional liability insurance (as applicable) in reasonable conformity to the insurance carried by Contractor.
f. In addition, any tasks or services performed by sub-contractors shall be subject to each provision of this Contract. Contractor shall include the following language in their Contract with any sub-contractor: “Sub-Contractors hired by Contractor agree to be bound to Contractor and the City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to the City.”
g. The requirements in this Section 12 shall not apply to persons who are merely providing materials, supplies, data or information that Contractor then analyzes and incorporates into its work product.

13. SAFETY:
a. Contractor acknowledges that the City is committed to the highest standards of workplace safety. Contractor will be solely and completely responsible for conditions of all vehicles owned or operated by Contractor, including the safety of all persons and property during performance of the services and tasks under this Contract.

Contractor shall assume sole and complete responsibility for the safety of Contractor's employees and any of subcontractor's employees This requirement will apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. In addition, Contractor will comply with all safety provisions in conformance with U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Act, any equivalent state law, and all other applicable Fonroche Lighting America
1400
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
federal, state, county and local laws, ordinances, codes, and any regulations that may be detailed in other parts of the Contract. Where any of these are in conflict, the more stringent requirements will be followed. Contractor’s failure to thoroughly familiarize itself with the aforementioned safety provisions will not relieve it from compliance with the obligations and penalties set forth herein.
b. Contractor will immediately notify the City (in no event less than 24 hours) of any incident of death, serious personal injury or substantial property damage that occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract. Contractor will promptly submit to the City a written report of all incidents that occur in connection with this Contract. This report must include the following information: (i) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); (ii) name and address of Contractor’s employee(s) involved in the incident; (iii) name and address of Contractor’s liability insurance carrier; (iv) a detailed description of the incident; and (v) a police report.
c. Contractor acknowledges that the City shall have the right to impose, at the City’s sole discretion, requirements that it deems are necessary to protect the health and safety of the City employees, residents, and visitors. Contractor agrees to comply with all such requirements, including, but not limited to, mandatory vaccinations, the use of personal protective equipment (e.g. masks), physical distancing, and health screenings.

Contractor also agrees to make available to the City, at the City’s request, records to demonstrate Contractor’s compliance with this Section.

14. INSURANCE:

Insurance requirements are set forth in Exhibit F to this Contract. Contractor shall abide by the insurance requirements set forth in said Exhibit F.

15. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS:
a. During the term of this Contract, Contractor shall keep fully informed of all existing and future state and federal laws and all municipal ordinances and regulations of the City of Richmond which affect the manner in which the services or tasks are to be performed by Contractor, as well as all such orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over the same. Contractor shall comply with all applicable laws, state and federal and all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by the City. Compliance under this provision includes compliance with all provisions of the Richmond Municipal Code ("Municipal Code"), including Chapters 2.50,

2.52, 2.56, and 2.60, if applicable.
b. Contractor acknowledges that under § 2.60.070 of the Municipal Code ("Living Wage Ordinance"), Contractor is required to provide the City with documents and information verifying its compliance with the Living Wage Ordinance. Contractor shall notify each of its affected employees with regards to the wages that are required to be paid pursuant to the Living Wage Ordinance as prescribed in § 2.60.070 of the Municipal Code.

Fonroche Lighting America
1401
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
c. Contractor shall comply with § 2.28.030 of the Municipal Code, obligating every Contractor or sub-Contractor under an agreement or sub-agreement with the City for public works, goods or services to refrain from discriminatory employment or practices on the basis of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religious creed, national origin or ancestry of any employee, any applicant for employment or any potential sub-contractor. d. Contractor acknowledges that the City’s Drug Free Workplace Policy, Violence in the Workplace Policy and the Policy Against Workplace Harassment, are available on the City’s website at http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/workplacepolicies.

Contractor agrees to abide by the terms and conditions of said policies.

16. INTEGRATED CONTRACT:

The Recitals and exhibits are a material part of this Contract and are expressly incorporated herein. This Contract represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof. Any modification of this Contract will be effective only by written execution signed by both the City and Contractor.

17. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS:

In the event of a conflict between these General Conditions and those of any Exhibit or attachment hereto, these General Conditions shall prevail; provided, however, that any Special Condition as set forth in Exhibit E shall prevail over these General Conditions. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more Exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by the Contractor, and the terms and conditions preferred by the City shall prevail over those preferred by the Contractor.

18. FORCE MAJEURE:

Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligations hereunder to the extent that the performance of such an obligation is prevented or delayed by reason of acts of God, strikes, boycotts, lock-outs, inability to procure materials not related to the price thereof, failure of power, restrictive governmental laws and regulations enacted after the date of this Contract, riots, civil unrest, acts of terrorism, insurrection, war, declaration of a state or national emergency or other reasons of a like nature not within the reasonable control of such party.

19. CONFLICT OF LAW:

This Contract shall be interpreted under, and enforced by the laws of the State of Fonroche Lighting America
1402
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
California without regard to any choice of law rules which may direct the application of laws of another jurisdiction. The Contract and obligations of the parties are subject to all valid laws, orders, rules, and regulations of the authorities having jurisdiction over this Contract (or the successors of those authorities). Any suits brought pursuant to this Contract shall be filed with the courts of the County of Contra Costa, State of California.

20. CLAIMS:

Any claim by Contractor against City hereunder shall be subject to Government Code §§ 800 et seq. The claims presentation provisions of said Act are hereby modified such that the presentation of all claims hereunder to the City shall be waived if not made within six months after accrual of the cause of action.

21. INTERPRETATION:

This Contract shall be interpreted as if drafted by both parties.

22. WARRANTY:

If any product is be provided to the City as part of this Contract, Contractor warrants as follows: Contractor possesses good title to the product and the right to transfer the product to City; the product shall be delivered to the City free from any security interest or other lien; the product meets any specifications contained herein; the product shall be free from material defects in materials and workmanship under normal use for a period of one (1) year from the date of delivery; and the product shall be fit for its intended purpose(s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, consumable and maintenance items (such as light bulbs and batteries) shall be warranted for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date of delivery. All repairs during the warranty period shall be promptly performed by Contractor, at Contractor's expense, including shipping.

23. SEVERABILITY:

In the event that any of the provisions or portions or applications thereof of this Contract are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, City and Contractor shall negotiate an equitable adjustment in the provisions of the Contract with a view toward effecting the purpose of this Contract, and the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions or portions or applications thereof, shall not be affected thereby.

24. AUTHORITY:

City warrants and represents that the signatory hereto (the Mayor of the City of Richmond or the City Manager) is duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of City. The party signing on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that they are duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor, Fonroche Lighting America
1403
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
and shall be personally liable to City if they are not duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor.

25. WAIVER:

The waiver by City of any breach of any term or provision of this Contract shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach. Inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the City relating to the Contractor’s performance, or payment therefore, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor’s obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the City be thereby stopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions of this Contract.

26. COUNTERPARTS:

This Contract may be executed in any number of counterparts (including by fax, PDF, DocuSign, or other electronic means), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

27. SANCTUARY CITY CONTRACTING ORDINANCE (SCCO):

The Richmond Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance No. 12-18 prohibits the City from granting and or retaining contracts with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor must submit the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement, attached hereto as Exhibit G.

Fonroche Lighting America
1404
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT E

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The General Conditions are hereby amended to include the following modifications and/or provisions (if applicable, otherwise please state “NONE”):

Fonroche Lighting America
1405
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT F

INSURANCE PROVISIONS
☐ CHECK HERE IF RISK MANAGEMENT HAS APPROVED WAIVING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS CONTRACT.

1. CERTIFICATES: Before the commencement of the terms of this Contract, and during the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, Contractor shall furnish the City’s Risk Manager with certificates showing the type, amount, class of operations covered, effective dates and dates of expiration of insurance coverage in compliance with coverage requirements set forth by the City and incorporated herein.

Such certificates, which do not limit Contractor’s indemnification, shall also contain substantially the following statement:
“Should any of the above insurance covered by this certificate be canceled or coverage reduced before the expiration date thereof, the insurer affording coverage shall provide thirty (30) days’ advance written notice to the City of Richmond.

Attention: Risk Manager.”
Contractor shall maintain in force at all times during the performance of this Contract all appropriate coverage of insurance required by this Contract with an insurance company licensed to offer insurance business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII or Standard & Poor’s Rating (if rated) of at least BBB unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Contractor shall deliver updated insurance certificates to the City at the address set forth in Exhibit C prior to the expiration of the existing insurance certificate for the duration of the term of Contract.

Endorsements naming the City, its City Council, boards, commissions, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insured shall be submitted with the insurance certificates.

2. COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS: The City’s insurance requirements depend upon the type of service being provided and/or the provider. The City’s insurance requirements will fall into one of the following categories (unless otherwise provided by the City):

Consultants and Contractors – Type 1
Professional Services – Type 2
Environmental Risk/Hazardous Waste Material – Type 3
Lease of City Property – Type 4
Vendors, Suppliers, Small Grant Recipients & Nonprofit Organizations – Type 5 Transportation Providers – Type 6
Professional Services Pyrotechnics – Type 7
Cyber and I.T. Risks – Type 8
Fonroche Lighting America
1406
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
The insurance requirements classification applicable to this Contract shall be attached to this Exhibit F and made a part hereof.

3. FAILURE TO SECURE: If Contractor at any time during the term hereof should fail to secure or maintain the foregoing insurance, the City shall be permitted to obtain such insurance in Contractor’s name or as an agent of Contractor and shall be compensated by Contractor for the costs of the insurance premiums at the maximum rate permitted by law and computed from the date written notice is received that the premiums have not been paid.

4. SUFFICIENCY OF INSURANCE: The insurance limits required by the City are not represented as being sufficient to protect Contractor. Contractor is advised to consult Contractor’s insurance broker to determine adequate coverage for Contractor. The coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Contract; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of the coverage carried by or available to Contractor; whichever is greater.

INSERT INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS CLASSIFICATION APPLICABLE TO THIS CONTRACT: (IF NECESSARY, CONFIRM WITH RISK MANAGER)
Fonroche Lighting America
1407
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT G

SANCTUARY CITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
The undersigned, (hereafter "Contractor"), has had an opportunity to review the requirements of City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 (hereafter "Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance" or “SCCO”).

Contractor understands and agrees that the City may choose with whom it will maintain business relations and may refrain from contracting with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor understands the meaning of the following terms used in the SCCO:
a. "Data Broker” means either of the following:
i. The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector business and government agencies;
ii. The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose from that for which it is ultimately used.
b. “Extreme Vetting” means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar services."
Contractor understands that it is not eligible to receive or retain a City contract if at the time the Contract is executed, or at any time during the term of the Contract, it provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE.

Contractor further understands and agrees that Contractor's failure to comply with the SCCO shall constitute a material default of the Contract and the City Manager may terminate the Contract and bar Contractor from bidding on future contracts with the City for five (5) years from the effective date of the contract termination.

By executing this statement, Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of the SCCO and that if at any time during the term of the Contract it ceases to comply, Contractor will promptly notify the City Manager in writing. Any person or entity who knowingly or willingly supplies false information in violation of the SCCO shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a $1,000 fine.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Printed Name: Title:

Signed: Date:

Business Entity:

Fonroche Lighting America
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428

Page 1 of 3 ends

November 19, 2024
Public Works
DATE: November 19, 2024
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, PE, Director of Public Works
Robert Armijo, PE, Deputy Public Works Director / City
Engineer
Subject: Authorize the City Manager to Sign Letter of Intent for Sludge Ponds Lease Extension
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact associated with signing the Letter of Intent (LOI). The LOI serves as a good faith commitment to negotiate the terms of the sludge ponds
lease extension, with any future financial obligations to be addressed in the final lease agreement, which will be brought to Council for approval later. Any future costs would be paid from the Wastewater Enterprise Fund(s).

The current lease agreement is covered under
Resolution 61-20 at a rate of $293,783/year which will be paid from 40322731-400202.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

Not Applicable

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The West County Agency (WCA), responsible for
biosolids processing at the City of Richmond's
wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), is dissolving by the end of 2024. To ensure the continuation of operations at the WWTP, the City must continue having access to the
sludge ponds currently leased from West County
Wastewater (WCW). Staff is requesting City Council
approval of a Letter of Intent (LOI) with WCW to be
signed by the City Manager to continue leasing the
sludge ponds through 2025, ensuring uninterrupted
AGENDA
REPORT
1429

Page 2 of 3 ends

November 19, 2024
biosolids processing until the new biosolids facility is in operation and the lease terms for use of the new facility are negotiated.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: AUTHORIZE the City Manager to sign the Letter of Intent (LOI) with West County Wastewater (WCW) to continue
leasing the sludge ponds in 2025, ensuring continued
biosolids processing at the City's wastewater treatment plant following the dissolution of the West County Agency – Public Works (Robert Armijo 620-5477/Daniel
Chavarria 620-4778)
The West County Agency (WCA), a joint powers authority formed between West County Wastewater (WCW) and the City of Richmond (City), manages several critical operations shared between the two entities. These responsibilities include the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting and operation of the joint outfall, the Sodium Bisulfite (SBS) facilities, biosolids handling, and other key services.

Sludge, the solid byproduct of the wastewater treatment process, includes materials that remain after the entire treatment cycle, which includes primary clarification, biological digestion, and tertiary treatment. In Richmond's wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), which uses standard tertiary treatment, sludge is generated after the removal of debris, sediment, and dissolved substances, followed by biological treatment and final clarification. This sludge requires further processing to stabilize it and reduce its volume before it can be safely disposed of or reused. Currently, the final-stage sludge is transported to WCW’s sludge ponds for drying and additional treatment.

Historically, the sludge ponds, located at WCW's East Site, have been critical for the City’s biosolids management, as they allow for the sludge to be processed into a form that meets environmental standards for disposal or reuse. Without these ponds, the City would not have the necessary infrastructure to handle the final-stage treatment of sludge, which is a vital step in the overall wastewater treatment process.

The City currently has a lease agreement with WCW which allows the City to pump the biosolids generated at Richmond’s Wastewater Treatment Plant to WCW sludge ponds (Attachment 3).

WCW issued a Lease Termination Notice to the City on August 28, 2023, informing the City the ponds would no longer be available to the City after December 31, 2024 (Attachment 4). The City’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) lacks facilities to process final-stage sludge independently. If the City fails to process sludge properly, it risks non-compliance with environmental regulations, which could lead to fines, penalties, or disruptions to wastewater services.
1430

Page 3 of 3 ends

November 19, 2024
WCW is building a new biosolids treatment facility at their wastewater treatment plant.

This new facility, once complete, will have the capacity to treat both WCW’s and the City’s biosolids (aka sludge) to a Class A standard, meaning the sludge will be treated to the highest level, suitable for reuse in agricultural and other applications. However, the facility is not expected to be operational by the end of 2024, necessitating an interim solution to avoid potential disruptions in the City's wastewater treatment operations.

WCW has proposed extending the current lease until such time as the new biosolids treatment facility is fully operational.

The Letter of Intent (LOI) being presented to the City Council, between the City and WCW, serves to memorialize the parties intention to extend the lease term for City’s use of the sludge ponds and for the City to eventually enter into an Operating Agreement with WCW for the treatment of the City’s biosolids as soon as the facility is online and operational (Attachment 2). While the LOI does not finalize the terms of the Operating Agreement, it informs WCW of the City’s good-faith intentions. This step is crucial to maintaining compliance with environmental regulations and avoiding any interruption in wastewater treatment services.

Approval of the LOI will confirm the City’s commitment to addressing its biosolids processing needs and provide an important step toward ensuring continued WWTP operations after the dissolution of the WCA.

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the LOI with WCW (Attachment 1). This interim action will allow time for both parties to negotiate and finalize the Operating Agreements for the treatment of the City’s biosolids (sludge) and will ensure the City's access to the sludge ponds in 2025. Without this commitment, the City risks a lapse in biosolids processing capacity, which could have serious operational and regulatory consequences for the WWTP.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Resolution for City Manager to sign LOI
Attachment 2 – Letter of Intent
Attachment 3 – Lease Agreement
Attachment 4 - Letter of Termination (West County Wastewater) 1431
RESOLUTION NO. XX-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A LETTER

OF INTENT (LOI) WITH WEST COUNTY WASTEWATER (WCW) FOR THE LEASE OF SLUDGE PONDS BEGINNING IN 2025
WHEREAS, the West County Agency (WCA), a joint authority formed between West County Wastewater (WCW) and the City of Richmond (COR), has been responsible for multiple key operations including the management of the City’s biosolids processing using sludge ponds located at WCW’s East Site; and
WHEREAS, the WCA is set to dissolve by the end of 2024, which will necessitate securing a new lease agreement with WCW for the continued use of the sludge ponds for the City’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) biosolids processing; and WHEREAS, the City of Richmond’s WWTP utilizes tertiary treatment, and the finalstage sludge byproduct, consisting of the solid remainders from the entire treatment process, including digestion and clarification, is processed at WCW’s sludge ponds, as the City currently lacks the facilities to process final sludge on its own; and WHEREAS, West County Wastewater is developing a new biosolids treatment facility, but this facility will not be fully operational by the end of 2024, requiring an interim solution to continue biosolids processing; and
WHEREAS, the Letter of Intent (LOI) between the City of Richmond and WCW will serve as a good faith commitment to continue leasing the sludge ponds, ensuring that the City can maintain uninterrupted wastewater treatment operations while a formal lease agreement is negotiated; and
WHEREAS, failure to secure continued access to the sludge ponds could result in significant operational and regulatory impacts for the City’s WWTP, including potential environmental non-compliance; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richmond, as follows:

Section 1: The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and this City Council hereby so finds and determines.

Section 2: The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a Letter of Intent (LOI) with West County Wastewater (WCW) for the lease of sludge ponds, ensuring continued biosolids processing at the City’s wastewater treatment plant starting in 2025.

Section 3: The Letter of Intent will serve as a preliminary agreement, with the final lease terms to be negotiated and brought to the City Council for final approval. 1432
Section 4: The City Council acknowledges that this interim measure is necessary to ensure the continuity of wastewater treatment operations following the dissolution of the West County Agency (WCA).

Section 4: the City Manager is authorized to take any additional actions necessary to finalize and implement the terms of the LOI, and to return to the City Council with the formal lease agreement for approval.

Section 5: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. **********************
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution of the Council of the City of Richmond was duly passed and adopted at a meeting thereof held November 19, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTION:
___________PAMELA CHRISTIAN___________

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
1433
450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA 94804-1630
Telephone: (510) 620-6512 Fax: (510) 620-6542 www.ci.richmond.ca.us DocID #29969v1
CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
October 9, 2024
West County Wastewater District
Attn: Andrew Clough, General Manager
2910 Hilltop Drive.

Richmond CA 94806
Re: Letter of Intent in response to Lease Termination Notice Dear Mr. Clough:

As you know, in August 2023 the City received the letter submitted by West County Wastewater on August 28, 2023, stating that the City of Richmond’s (the City’s) lease agreement for the Sludge Ponds (“Lease Agreement”) would be terminated effective December 31, 2024.

The City has been participating in several meetings with West County Wastewater staff and this matter has been discussed at length. It was noted at one of these meetings that West County Wastewater’s new biosolids treatment facility will have the ability/capacity to treat the City’s biosolids that would have been previously sent to the Sludge Ponds.

City staff and West County Wastewater’s staff continue to discuss the terms that would govern the treatment of the City’s biosolids in the new treatment facility.

As you are aware, the City has partnered with West County Wastewater regarding the cost analysis for some of the agreements that will be negotiated as both Districts continue with the dissolution of the West County Agency.

One of the agreements that would need to be negotiated as part of these agreements is the treatment of the City’s Biosolids. Staff has also been informed at recent West County Agency meetings that the Biosolids Treatment Facility may not be capable of treating the City’s biosolids by December 31, 2024.

Accordingly, the City accepts West County Wastewater offer to extend the term of the Lease Agreement beginning on January 1, 2025 on a month-to-month basis to allow the City to continue using the Sludge Ponds in accordance with the terms of the Lease Agreement. It is anticipated that such use shall continue until the West County’s biosolids treatment facility is operational and can adequately treat the City’s sludge. City and West County Wastewater acknowledge and agree that the Lease Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days prior written notice.

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me directly. I can be reached at (510) 620-6512 or via e-mail at [email protected]. 1434
DocID #29969v1
Respectfully,
Shasa Curl, City Manager
Copies (electronic):

Daniel Chavarria, Director of Public Works
[email protected]
Robert Armijo, Deputy Director of Public Works
[email protected]
James Atencio, Senior Assistant City Attorney
[email protected]
Mary Phelps, Water Resource Division Manager
[email protected]
Aaron Winer, Director of Environmental Services
[email protected]
Nicole Witt, Attorney, West County Wastewater
[email protected]
1435
1436
1437
1438

EXHIBIT
A
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
August 28, 2023
City of Richmond
ATTN: Shasa Curl, City Manager
450 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 300
Richmond, CA 94804
sent electronically to:
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]

LEASE TERMINATION NOTICE
Dear Ms. Curl:

This Lease Termination Notice (“Notice”) pertains to the Lease Agreement dated January 1, 2010, and amended on January 1, 2017 (together, the “Lease”) between West County Wastewater District ("Landlord"), and the City of Richmond & Richmond Municipal Sewer District ("Tenant"), whereby Tenant leases certain property owned by Landlord known as the East Site Sludge Lagoons.

On June 24, 2020, Tenant requested an extension of the Lease pursuant to Section 2.2.4 of the Agreement. The Fourth Extended Term, as that term is defined in the Lease, extends through December 31, 2025.

Section 2.3 of the Lease provides that "either Landlord or Tenant may terminate this Lease in their discretion upon one-year written notice to the non-terminating party." Pursuant to Section 2.3 of the Lease, Landlord hereby provides notice to Tenant that the Lease will terminate effective December 31, 2024.

This Notice does not relieve the City of payment of any financial obligation for rent owed until the actual date of termination of the tenancy. 1447
Please contact me directly with any questions at 510-815-4525.

Sincerely,
Andrew Clough
General Manager
CC:

Aaron Winer, WCW - Director of Water Quality and Resource Recovery Nicole Witt, WCW - General Counsel
Mary Phelps, City of Richmond - Project Manager I
1448

Page 1 of 4 ends

November 19, 2024
Public Works
DATE: November 19, 2024
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, Director of Public Works
Mary Phelps, Water Resource Division Manager
Subject: Resolution to Authorize Task Authorizations with Veolia Water North America for Stormwater Maintenance and
Repairs
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed expenditure of $750,000 shall be funded from the approved budget in the American Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA) Fund [Account String: 13623331-400708-
22107.]

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

N/A

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

City staff is asking the City Council to adopt a resolution approving Task Authorizations with Veolia Water North
America to address essential repairs and maintenance
for the City’s stormwater collection system and trash
capture devices. It is critical that the City secure
emergency funding in order to perform the required
repairs and maintenance of the various locations of the stormwater collections system prior to rainy season of
2024.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution to authorize Task Authorizations with Veolia Water North America in an amount not to
exceed $750,000 for the maintenance of the Large Trash
Capture Devices and repairs to the stormwater collection system at multiple locations - Public Works (Daniel
Chavarria 510-620-5478/Mary Phelps (510) 621-1269).

AGENDA
REPORT
1449

Page 2 of 4 ends

November 19, 2024
DISCUSSION:

Background
In February 2019, Caltrans was issued a Cease-and-Desist Order from the State Water Resources Control Board for failure to effectively manage trash. As such, Caltrans provided funding to the City of Richmond in the form of Cooperative Implementation Agreements (CIAs) or “grants” to engineer, construct and install several large trash capture devices in the City’s stormwater collection system. These devices collect trash that is discarded and/or dumped into the city’s collection system, which is trapped and then removed preventing the trash from being discharged into the San Francisco Bay.

Likewise, Section C.10 of the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for Stormwater mandates trash management states that the City must comply annually by reporting how much trash is removed from the stormwater collection system by means of trash removal devices, illegal dumping that is cleaned up, monthly neighborhood dumpster days, etc.

In 2004, the Richmond City Council adopted Amendment #1 to the Agreement with Veolia Water North America (previously U.S. Filter) to include the operation and maintenance of the sanitary and storm sewer collection system (Attachment 2). On March 1, 2026, City Council adopted Amendment #4 to the Agreement with Veolia Water North America which included several updates including operation and maintenance of two (2) large trash capture device units: one located in the Hilltop area, and one (1) located at 7th Street (Attachment 3).

Due to the mandates in the City’s Stormwater NPDES permit, the other large trash capture devices must also be maintained. This can be accomplished by issuing Task Authorizations with Veolia Water North America to operate, clean and maintain the devices and the perform the required repairs to the stormwater infrastructure. This is not to be a continuous agreement or contract. These Task Authorizations are only for work to be performed during the remainder of FY 2024-25.

At present, there are four (4) additional large capture devices that have been installed in the City’s stormwater collection system for a total of six (6) units. They are currently at the following locations:
 Hilltop (Veolia maintains per Amendment 4 to the Agreement)  7
th Street (Veolia maintains per Amendment 4 to the Agreement)  Bayview Ave. & Carlson Blvd. (no maintenance agreement in place) 1450

Page 3 of 4 ends

November 19, 2024
 Regatta Blvd. & Marina Bay Pkwy (no maintenance agreement in place)  Cutting Blvd. & South 3rd St. (no maintenance agreement in place)  South 8th St. & Potrero Ave. (no maintenance agreement in place) Analysis
The Stormwater Enterprise budget is severely lacking in funding, as the rates have not been increased in over twenty years. Therefore, City staff has reviewed the requirements of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), codified at 42 USC § 801 and implemented through regulations adopted at 31 CFR § 35, and is of the opinion that the operation/maintenance of the four additional large capture devices would qualify for ARPA funding.

Specifically, the following locations require attention for stormwater maintenance and/or repairs:

As previously mentioned, Amendment 4 to the Agreement the City has with Veolia Water North America only addresses the operation and maintenance of two (2) of the six (6) trash capture devices.

If City Council does not approve the proposed Task Authorizations with Veolia, the City will be non-compliant with the City ‘s NPDES permit and could possibly face enforcement actions or financial penalties.

TA No. Location Cost Mark-up Total
24905 Trash Capture Device Maintenance $ 499,408.91 $ 49,940.89 $ 549,349.80 230806 2558 Sheldon Drive 150' Collapsed Storm Drain Sewer $ 82,700.00 $ 13,645.50 $ 96,345.50 240710 Country View Drive & Brookwood Lane collapsed Storm Drain $ 53,700.00 $ 8,860.50 $ 62,560.50 230410 831 Chanslor Ave Sink Hole over 12" Storm Drain $ 18,605.00 $ 1,860.50 $ 20,465.50 241006 Safeway Beverage Plant - clear debris $ 3,500.00 $ 350.00 $ 3,850.00 230402 Sante Fe - install new inlet box $ 14,800.00 $ 1,480.00 $ 16,280.00 Contingency $ 1,148.70
Total ARPA Funding required $ 750,000.00
1451

Page 4 of 4 ends

November 19, 2024
Conclusion
City staff is requesting City Council authorize approving Task Authorizations to Veolia Water North America for a not-to-exceed amount of $750,000 to maintain and operate four additional large trash capture devices and perform necessary repairs to the stormwater infrastructure.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Amendment 1 to Agreement
Attachment 3 – Amendment 4 to Agreement
Attachment 4 – Veolia Task Authorizations
1452
Reso. No. XX-24

Page 1 of 3 ends

DocID #31272v1
RESOLUTION NO. XX-XX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH VEOLIA WATER NORTH

AMERICA FOR THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIRS OF THE STORMWATER COLLECTION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $750,000 TO BE PAID WITH THE USE OF AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDING.

WHEREAS, on February 13, 2019, the California State Water Resources Control Board issued Caltrans a Cease-and-Desist Order to clean up the Bay by removing trash; and WHEREAS, the City of Richmond (the City) entered into several Cooperative Implementation Agreement with Caltrans to design, construct and install large Hydrodynamic Separators (HDS) also knows as “Large Trash Capture Device” in the City’s stormwater collection system to aid and assist with the removal of trash, sediment, pollutants and debris; and
WHEREAS, Caltrans funded the installation of these large trash capture devices at several locations throughout the City via grants; and
WHEREAS, after the HDS units were installed, the City would own, operate and maintain the large trash capture devices; and
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2002, Richmond City Council adopted an Agreement (the Agreement) between the City of Richmond and Veolia Water North America to assume operations and maintenance the Wastewater Treatment Plant located at 601 Canal Blvd; and WHEREAS, Amendment Number One (1) to the Agreement adopted by City Council in 2004 required Veolia Water North America (previously U.S. Filter) to assume the operation and maintenance of the sanitary and storm sewer collection system and:

WHEREAS, in 2016, City Council adopted Amendment Number Four (4) to the Agreement between the City and Veolia that would include the operation and maintenance of two (2) of these large trash capture devices that are located at Hilltop and Seventh Streets; and
WHEREAS, Caltrans procured additional funding after the installation of the two (2) devices were installed at Hilltop and Seventh Street to add four (4) more trash capture devices at the following locations:
 Marina Bay Parkway
 South 8th Street
 Regatta Blvd
 Bayview and S. 3rd St.

WHEREAS, Section C.10 (Trash Management) of the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, Order No. R2-2022-0018, issued May 11, 2022 requires the City to have 100% trash removal by June 30, 2025; and WHEREAS, the trash capture devices assist the City with trash removal from the stormwater collection system as long as they are properly maintained; and WHEREAS, the Amendment Number Four (4) to the Agreement between Veolia Water North America and the City does not include the operation and maintenance of the four (4) additional trash capture devices; and
WHEREAS, until the Agreement with Veolia is amended to include the operation and maintenance of the trash capture device units, the City will require additional funding to provide these services; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the operation and maintenance of the trash capture devices, there are additional repairs that are required in several locations of the stormwater collection 1453
Reso. No. XX-24

Page 2 of 3 ends

DocID #31272v1
system; and
WHEREAS, the Stormwater Enterprise Fund does not currently have additional funds to procure for repairs and/or additional maintenance required for these items; and| WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the requirements of the American Rescue Plan Act ARPA (31 CFR § 35) and is of the opinion that the operation and maintenance of the fourh additional trash capture devices would qualify as a permitted use of funds to provide necessary water and sewer infrastructure.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Richmond hereby authorize the issuance of Task Authorizations with Veolia Water North America for the above required operation, maintenance and repairs of the stormwater collection system.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED this project will be funded by previously approved funding from the American Rescue Plan Act, and the FY 2024-25 Water Resource Recovery Budget to the extent necessary, in the amount of $750,000 for costs associated with this project.
*********************
1454
Reso. No. XX-24

Page 3 of 3 ends

DocID #31272v1
CLERK’S

CERTIFICATE
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held November 19, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. XX-XX, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on November 19, 2024
Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
1455
Reso
. No.XX-24
Page4of3
DocID #31272v1
1456
08/29/2004 WED 14:00 FAX
AMENDrnNT ONE
TO THE

CITY OF RICHMOND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PACLLITY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, OPERATIONS,

MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEWNT AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN
THE Crn OF RICHMOND, CALI-FORNIA
AND
VEOLIA WATER NORTH AMJZRICA OPERATING SERVICES, INC. (J?/K/A U.S.

FILTER OPERGTlNG SERVICES, LNC.)
DATED AS OF MAY 15,2002
THIS AIMEmMENT is entered into on the 7& day of &- 2004, by and between THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA (the "City") and ~LTA WATER NORTH AMERICA OPERATTNG SERVICES, TNC., f&rly l&kvn as US FTLTER OPERATING SERVTCES, INC. (the "Company").

WHEREAS, City and Company entered into the City of Richmond Wastewater Treatment Facility Capita1 Improvements, Operations, Maintenance and Management Agreement dated May 15, 2002 (the "Ageement"), whi~h provides, among other things, for COMPANY to design and construct certain capital improvements at the City's Wastewater Treatment Facility (the "Facilityy') and for Company to operate, maintain and manage the Facility during the term of the Agreement; and
WEWREAS, the City currently owns, operates and maintains a separate sanitary sewage collection system ("Sanitary Collection System"), which consists of a network of an estimated 185 miles of sewer lines with appurtenant manholes, and 13 wastewater liift stations, and a stormwater callection system ("Stormwater Collection System"), which consists of an estimated 94 miles of stormwater main lines, 3,300 catch basins, 1,200 manholes, 6 miles of opm ditch, 6 miles of V ditch and 7 stormwater lift stations (the above Systems hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Collection System"); and
WHEREAS, the operation of the Collection System directly impacts the operation ofthe.

Facility under the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Article XI of the Agreement provides that the City md the Clrmpany can agree to add additional services to the Agreement as may be mutually agreed to by the parties; and
WHEREAS, the parties now desire for the Company to operate, maintain and manage and perform construction management responsibilities with respect to the City's Collection System.
1457
09/29/2004 WED 14:00 FAX
.2 . .

NOW, THEREFORE, in mutual consideration herein described and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. '1%~ following definitions shall only apply to the Scrvices performed in connection with thc Collection System under this Amendment:
"Amendment Cummencement Date" is October 15,2004, or earlier as mutually agreed, "Capital Irn~rovemmts" means any expenditures for: (1) the purchase of new equipment or facility items that add to or replace elements of the Collection System; (2) the material improvcnlent or upgrade of dl or part of tlic Collection System; anhr (3) repairs tu the Collection System. All expmdtures in connection with Capital Improvements are the responsibility of the City.
"W' or "Cornbind Sewer Overflows" means the two locations in the Richmond system where the Sanitary Collection System is designed to ovcrflow into the Stormwater Colleciion System when the hydradic capacity nf the Sanitary Collection System has been reached, such ar during a storm event.
"Maintenance" means those routine and/or repetitive activities required or recommended by the equipment or facility manufacturer or by the Company to maintain the performance and maximize the service life of the various elements of thc CoUcction Systcm. "Renairs" means those non-muhcfnon-repetihve activities required for operational continuity, safety and performance generally due to failurc or to avert a 3hilure of the equipment or facilities or some component thereof of the Collection System. "SSOs" .-- or "Sewer System Overflow" means overflows, breaks, blockdgas and backups of the Sanitary Collection System.

2. Operation of the Colle~tion Svstem. Company shall operate, maintain and repair the Collection System consistent with its present condition within the design capacity and operating capabilities of the installed equipment and piping and other components of the Collectiol~ System.

The Company will assume l'ull-risk for the operation, repair and maintenance of the City's existing thirteen (13) sanitary sewer and seven (7) storrnwatw lift slations upvn [he cumpletion of the budgctcd lift station capital improvements described in Exhibit A. Cvmpany shall monitor thc alarms installed at the scwcr and stormwater liwpumping stations and CSOs on a 24-hour-a-day/7-day-a-week basis, and Company shall measure the flow rates at strategic locations within the Collection System Ibllowing curnpletion of the SCADA system upgrade and thc pump station improvements des~ribed in Exhibit A. All liftlpumping stations repair and maintenance (WM) will be tracked using the Company's CMMS system, and Company shall pcrform planned maintenance of all critical equipment included in the Collection System. Thc opcration and maintenance of 1458
09/29/2004 WED 14:00 FAX
the 1iWpumping stations will be included in the Company's overall operations and maintenance budget for the Collection System.

Company shall develop a plan utilizing as guidance the U.S. EPA's Drafi Capacity, Management, Operations & Maintenance (CMOM) guidelines dated March 2004 in m effort to (i) prevent or minimize sanitary sewer overflows or spills, (ii) minimize pump station spills, (iii) achieve the expected life of the managed assets included in the Collection System, (iv) mollitor and improve Collectinn System reliability and performance, and (v) efficiently use the City's fUnds alIocnted to the CvlIection System for operations and maintenance and to improve service reIiability of the Collectinn System (the "Management PIan")- The Management Plan will include the following elements:

Development of proper management, operation and maintenance procedures and performance measurements for thc Collection System.

This will be a~complished through the development of cleaning and televising strategies per the annual cleaning and televising frequencies proposed in this offering as well as the devdnprnent of a Hot Spas list for areas requiring more frequent maintenance until corrective measures can be implemented. AIso included will be written emergency response procedures for various emergencies, which couId arise from time to time.

1.1.1 Implementation of asset management and long-term planning geared to provide adequate system capacity for base and peak flows in the Collection System. This will be ac~omplished as described more thosuughly below through:

A. Use of WS software
B. Flow dala collection through basin monitoring
C. Rainfall modeling
D. GIS Mapping
E. A System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan
F. A written summary of the Company's Management Plan
G. Documentation that all feasible steps to stop and mitigate impacts of Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) have been taken. This will be on a phased basis as Company accepts responsibility for the system maintenance per the proposed cleaning and televising schedule and will be subject to City approval for capital repairs and replacements.

Development of procedures to notify parties with reasonable putcntial of being exposed to pollutants from SSOs. This will bc the development of SOP'S for the Company to pruvide notification per regulatory requirements to the local State Water Board, local Health Deparlmeni: and the City of Richmond in the event of a Sanitary Sewer overflow. This will be done in ~oopcration with the City of Richmond Tndustrial Pretreatment Program (WP) group 1459
08/28/2004 WED 14:01 FAX
who oversee all regulatory issues for the Collection System and csos.

H. Performance of rigorous self-audits through the Company's peer audit program to assess the quality of the Company's Management Plan.

H. Completion of a Company Management Plan summary report on an annual basis and providing that report to the City. At the City of Richmond's choosing, these rqorts may be supplied to regulatory agencies asfif this component of the CMOM is adopted.

2.2.3 The above services and Plans will be developed and performed based on the U.S. EPA's preliminary CMOM guidelines. In the went that the final CMOM rules or guidelines differ materialIy from the U.S. EPA's preliminary CMOM guidelines or thc services and Plans developed and pefiormed by the Company after the Effective Date of this Amendment, the parties will treat such material difierences as a Change in Law.

2.3 Maintenance of the Collection System wiIl be performed by the Company as part of the Annual Fee slated herein on a priority basis, with emergency itcms mmpleled first, and scheduled Maintenance performed in nccordance with the Company's Management Plan and the need and the date received.

2.4 Company shall develop and implement a plan to d13ciently use the City's capital hnds available for the C~llection System to reduce the City's current infiltratiodinflow (VI) problems as shown in Exhibit A. The exact allocations are subject to modification upon agreement between the City and Company.

2.5 Company shall assume responsibility for all rclevant customer service requirements related to the operation of the Collection System including response to routine and emergency calls and new service tap inspections. The Company shall coordinate its responses with the City's insurance and claims administration program to maintain consistency between the two programs.

2.6 Company will prcpare a plan for inspecting and maintaining the manholes in the Collection System on a four-year cycle. This work will be coordinated with the system cleaning program, and the manhole work will include replacing worn manhole rings and covers and adjusling manhole rings and covers for road construction. Data and information from the manhole inspection and m-aintenance reports will be used as the basis for identifying manholes that are in need of capital replacement or rehabilitation. The Annual Fee includes the labor and overhead needed to raise or lower 260 manholes per year. Funds tbr manhole matmials will be charged against the City's Capital Improvements budget.

2.7 Company wilI wvrk with the City to provide updated data and information showing sewer mains, manholes and lift stations for the City's Geographic Information System (GIs), including completion of electronic mapping and the Sanitary Collectic~n Systenl database,
1460
09/29/2004 WED 14:01 FAX

2.8 Company will maintain the easements for the lift/pump station easements, by mowing, clearing brush, controlling litter and performing Maintenance where needed at the lift stations.

2.9 In addition to regular line cleaning, the Company will be responsible fm cleaning so-called '?lot Spots" areas of the Collection System that persistently contribute tu averflows and other incidents. The Company will use the City's Hot Spots list a$ a starting point for identifying and cleaning problem areas. If: as part of this process combined with cleaning and televising, additional Hot Spots are identified, the Company will revise the list and supply a copy to the City on a monthly basis fir review. This review wiIl give the City an understanding of where the Hot Spots are, a$ well as those that can be controlled through regular cleaning (with a schedule for doing so) and those that can only be mitigated through capital improvements. Such. Hot Spots will be prioritized to a capital improvements list. An example of the latter would be where an 8" line chokes down to a 6" line.

2.1 0 Company will perform all repair and maintenance activities relating to the City's vehicles listed in Exhibit "E" as part of the Annual Fee; provided, however, City shall be responsible for replacing any such vehicles as deemed necessary by the parties.

2.1 1 Section 3.5(3) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as fulullows; "(3) retain responsibility to perform meter reading and maimnance, enforce the Industrial Pretreatment Program, perform all regulatory duties, sampling analysis and reporting associated with the Starmwater Collection System and CSOs and perform long-tcrm Collection System and Service Area Planning;"

3. Capital Tmpr~vements. Company will assist the City in performing Capital Improvements to the Collection Systems as follows:

3.1 Company shall provide the City with turn-key services to implement a cornpreherlsive Sanitary Collection System rehabilitation program, utilizing the EPA's draft CMOM Program as guidance. The cost of the program will be paid by the City, with inilial fbnds derived fronl the 1999 Bond Issue of which approximately $22 million remains to be obligated. The methodology of the turnkey services is described below and generally includes scope deterniination, engineering services for the purpose of soliciting quotations from contractors, the solicitation of quatations from pre-qualified, invited, sub-contractors, execution of the construction work, and construction and project management and inspection.

3.2 Exhibit A is a pre1iminm-y CP broadly showing how the City couId invest the remaining $22 nillion of the 1999 sewer revenue bonds, including those funds previously obligated by the City for the program described in Exhibit B. This is an 1461
09/29/2004 WED 14:02 FAX
estimate for allocation purposes and depending on the needs of each specific defined project, funds can be moved from one line item to another to meet the needs of the City.

As soon as possible, but not later than sixty days aC1er the effective date of this Amendment, Company will evaluate the CoIIeaion System capital projects already identified by the City and will provide a budget level project mst estimate along with firm pricing for engineering services with the intent of preparing detailed scope documents and drawings to solicit contractor pricing. The next step will be to obtain constru&ion pricing using the prqared documents. Company will work with prequalified sub-contractors by invitation only. Subcontractor selection will be made by Company based on the best overall subcontractor, aficr sub-conkdctm bids are summarized for and reviewed with thc City. The Company will then execute the projects in a tirncly manna- while the study and evaluation work discussed below is being coalpIeted.

3.4 Company shall serve as constructiot~ program manager for all Capital Improvement work, including conducting the competitive bidding process.

Company shall develop requirements for the pre-qualification of bidders, with an emphasis on Iocal firms, to perform capital work. Company shall review and award contracts to implement the Capital Improvements work.

3.5 Within nine (9) months of the commen~ement date of this Amendment, Company shall prepare and submit to the City, an interim CTP, with the express purpose of informing the City of the Collection System repairs/rehabilitationdreplacements that have been discovered during the initial stages of the work. Following the same procedure described in Section 3.2 above, Ccrmpany will conduct engineering design, soli~it quotes fiom sub-contrardors and meet with the City to select the sub-contractor to proceed with the work.

3.6 Within IS months of the commencement date of this Amendment, Company shall complete a comprehensive Capital Tmprovement Plan (CP) for the wastewater collection lines, manholes, sewage lift stations, stormwater pumping stations and rolling slock utilized to maintain these systems. The CP will consist of two parts: (i) those Capital Improvements that have becn identified for funding and completion with the remaining dollar balance of the 1989 sewer revenue bond; and, (ii) any additional Capita1 lrnprovements that should be made farmuIated into a five-year capital plan updated annually and reviewed by the City. -

3.7 Upon completion of the CIP, Company will continue with the recommended and prioritized capital work following the protocoI described in Section 3.2 above until the 1999 Bond Funds are expended. Should additional finding be necessary to complete the recommended and prioritized work, at the City's discretion, Company will work with the City to explore options for additional funding. 1462
09/29/2004 WED 14:02 FAX

3.8 Company has performed a preliminary review of the condition of the 1ifWpumping stations. Most of them require Capital Improvements to bring them up to industry standards. Two need ta be replaced in their entirety. The Company's budget estimate for tl~e required Capital Improvements to the 1iWpumping stations is $3.2 million, which includes installation of emergency generators at each station as needed but excludes the Company's overhead and profit. Within 120 days of commencement: of this Amendment, the Company will complete the due diligence necessary to finalize the scope of work and pri~ing far the above Capital Improvements. Upon approvaI of the final scope of work and pricing by the City, the Company will complete all lift station Capital Improvements within 18 months. The Company will not assume full R&M risk for the lift/pumping stations until the Capital Zmprovements are completed. As the Capital Improvements for each pump station are completed, Company shall assume full R&M risk for the pump station under the Annual Fee subject to the terms of this Amendment.

3.9 The City will retain Company to perform an initial cleaning and Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection of the Collection System during the first two years of the Amendment.

3.10 Company will subsequently prepare a Systcm Cleaning Plan for cleaning all parts of the Collection Systcm on a four-year cycle, after the initial cleaning performed during the first two years. Problem areas will be cleaned on an as-needed basis, and hydraulic rodding will be used to clean facilities that are impacted by roots and grease. High pressure cleaning and vacuuming will be the primary preventive maintenance method used Ibr the Sanitary Collection System. The System Cleaning Plan will be updated every thee years in order to incorporate system additions. In additioq data and information from thcse cleaning rneports will be used to identify lines that are in need of capital replacement or rehabilitation.

Company may use an herbicide chemical treatment application for certain types of rout intrusions in sanitary sewer mains.

3.11 Company will use the City's CCTV irispection equipment to perForm inspections of problem areas or to perform routine inspections in the Collection System and to assess the internal condition of the overall wastewater collection lines and other appurtenances on a ten-year cycle after the initial televising performed during the fkst two years. Thcse inspections will be thoroughly documented in order to support the Company's operations and the City's Capital Tmprovoxnect Program (CIP). CCTV inspection will also be used to identify damaged pipe, rt~ot intrusion, grade problems, and grease buildups, as well as to pinpoint infiltration and illegaI inflows.

3.12 Company will work with the City to prepare annual budgets for repairing the Collection System. All repairs to thc Collection Systm shdl be paid for by the City as part of the City's CIP.
1463
08/29/2004 WED 14:02 FAX

3.13 During the third year of the Amendment, the parties will transfer the Enhanced Sanitary and Stormwater Program of the Capital Improvements work described above to the operations budgets included within the Annual Fee with appropriate changes to the Annual Fee as reflected in Exhibit C. Until such time, all Capital Improvements described above shall continue to be paid far by the City as part of the City's CTP.

4. Com~msation. Company's compensation for performing the Services described in this Amendment shall be as follows:

4.1 Company shall be paid an Annual Fee as shown in Exhibit C for operating and maintaining the Collection SyWem during the term of the Agreement. The Annual Fee shall be subject to adjustments as set forth in S~hedulc 5 of the Agreement.

The adjustments shall be made on the same schedule as the adjustments to the Facility Service Fee starting July 1, 2005.

3.1 The following items shall be considered Pass-Through Costs under Shedule 10 of the Agreement: electricity.; provided, however, Schedule 8 of' the Agreement shall not apply to such Pass-Through Costs.

4.3 Within 18 months of the Amendment Commencement Date, the City and Company may deveIop incentives whereby Company savings in the Annual Fee may be shared between the City and the Company.

4.4 Company shall be. paid by the City for Capital Improvement work based on monthly progress payments for the work completed and materials stored per industry standard, including Company's overhead and profit. Monthly invoices will be submitted with appropriate documentation to validate the amount requested.

Emplovees. On or before the commencement of the services described in this Amendment, the Company shall compIete its intmiewing of all current City employees involved with such sclvices whcther or not represented by collective bargaining representatives (the "City Employees") who are interested in and apply for a position with the Company. City Employees who apply for mployrnent with the Company shall be offered positions providing comparable wages and bencfits to their current City positions with the City. All City Employees may be required to take and pass Iawful drug testing as a condition of employment. Additionally, City Employees may be required to take a medical examination, the results of which shall not be a factor in their employment. During the first three (3) years of the Contract Term, he Company shall employ all City Employees hired as its employees in connection with the services performed under this Amendment.

5. I Orientation and Career Planning. Within the first two (2) weeks of starting to pedorm services under this Amendment, the Company shaIl conduct a Company orientation and career planning workshop or workshops at the Company's role 1464
09/29/2004 WED 14:03 FAX
cost and expense for City Employees. The workshop($) shall apprise City Employees hired under this Section of applicable legal requirements relative to their employment rights, and shall orient the City Employees to the Company's managerrlent, operation and maintenance policies and approaches (and its plan for providing such services under this Agreement), its career planning policy, its hiring program and criteria and its compensation and benefits plans.

Comu~~Iovment. The Company shall provide City Employees hircd under this Section with a totd package of compensation and benefits comparable to nr better than compensation and benefits provided by the City for a minimum of thrce years following the Commencement Date. The Company acknowledges that it has agreed to recognize and bargain in good faith with the City Employees' collective bargaining representatives, if applicable, to determine he specific terms md conditions of employment to which such City Employees wilI be subject. All City Employees hired under this Section shall receive year for year credit for years employed by the City for purposes of eligibility and vcsting in the Company's benefits programs. A11 City Employees and dependents currently covered by the City's health insurance program shall be covered during the employment of the City Jimployees under the Company's health insurance program without disqualification for pre-existing conditions.

5.3 Continued Employment. During the three-year period described in Section 5.2 above, he Company shall make available training and development provisions for then existing personnel to transition to future operations. The Company may reduce staffing numbers following the thee (3) year period with preferred approaches being voluntary attrition, buyouts, relocation and transfers rather than layoffs. Tnvoluntary layoff's of City Employees hired by the Company are not permissible during the three year period described above. Employees may be terminated for cause or work-related p~fumnce at any time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company's commitment to employ a City EmpIoyee under this Section 5 shall end upon the earlier of (i) the end of the three year period following the start of services under this Amendment; (ii) said City Employee reaching retirement age or (iii) earlier as mutuaIIy agreed by the City Employee and the Comlpa~ly. Notwithstanding any other terms of this Amendment or the Agreement to the contrary, nothing in this Amendment or the Agrcement shaIl be construed to obligate the Company to maintain minimum stflng levels for services provided under this Amendment or the Agreement unless such stafEng levels are required to meet the performance requirements of the contract or the applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

5.4 City wilI offer to buy-out the current full-time employees of the Collection System (see Exhibit D attached hereto) similar to the buy-outs that occurred in connection with the Facility. The buy-outs shall be no greater than 12 months of full-time salary and 6 months of City-provided COBRA benefits for each eligible employee as shown in Exhibit D. Cumpany shall reimburse the City for amounts paid by the City to the ment Collection System employees in connection with such buy-outs. 1465
09/29/2004 WED 14:03 FAX
I
I
6 Industrial Pre-Treatment Standards. The Annual Fec paid to Carnpany for operation and maintenance of the Collection System assumes that 5111 customers and users of the City Collection System that utilize and/or make discharges into the Collection System shall meet federal, state and Iocal pre-treatment standards and Applicable Law. City agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Company hmlcss from any and all claims, damages and losses to the eKtent that the same are caused by the faiIure of such customers/users tn comply with any or all applicable federal, state and local pre-treatment standards and Applicable Law.

Sewer System Overflows. Company shall establish a program to minimize claims and deal effectively with customers that do file claims against the City. Within 90 days of the commencement date of the Company's Services under this Amendment, Company shall establish (i) a routine, normal scwer line preventative maintenance program, and (ii) corrective procedures to be implemented in the event of any personal injury or property damage resulting from a sewer back-up. The program and procedures described in the previous sentence shall include a provision requiring the prompt notification of appropriate City personnel. Emergency calIs for service from residences and businesses will be received and responded to 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, 365 days per year.

Company will respond to CoIlection System pump station emergencies, and SSOs, and be on-site within two hours from receiving notice of such SSO occurrences. The approach that wilI be used in these responses will follow the protocol defined here:

6.0 If the cause of the SSO is identified as a broken or blocked service lateral, Company personnel on site will then notify the appropriate City code mforcement officiaI as appropriate per City protocol and the customer of the problem. The customer will be responsible fir repairing the break or clearing the bIockage and making the necessary repairs. If cleanup on public property is required, Company will perform this work on a time and inaterials basis and submit supportive documentation with an awompanying invoice to the City, which the City will pay unless the Company is determined to be at fault under Section 8 below.

6.0 Repairs made to the Collection stern of 525,000 or greater, excepting amcrgency repairs, shall require the Company to submit a description of the work and a fixed cost to the City, prior to performing the work. The City shall provide approval of such requests within five (5) business days of receipt. In the case of an emergency, a dcscription and invoice of the work performed will be provided within five (5) business days of completion of the emergency work. The Company shall make all reasonable efforts to notify the City of the need for emergency repairs prior to starting the work but the inability to contact the City shall not prevent thc work finm being completed.

7.3 If the cause of the SSO is identified as a broken pipe or blockage on the City's portion of the Collection System, thcn the Company person on-site will mange to have the broken pipe repaired or the blockage cleared, and the area cleaned up. Tf the cause is a pump station failure, Company will take immediate action to get the 1466
09/29/2004 WED 14:04 FAX
facility back in service. In either event, the Company shall (i) document the approximate date and time of the problem; (ii) determine Ihr: extent of the personal injury or property damage, if any; and (iii) provide notice to City's insurance carrier of the potential loss cIaim and (iv) make necessary calls and reports to regulatory agencies. The City will be icsponsible for thc cost of repairs and any claims unless thc Company is determined to Be at fault under Section X bdow.

7.4 Company will keep a log of dl SSO occurrences and provide a monthly summary to the City.

7.5 If a citizen fiIes a claim against City or Company, Company will notify the City, or the City shall notify the Company, and a third-party insurance carrier ~nutually agreeable to the City and Company, which will make a determination of liability and whethel- or not to pay the claim filed by the citizen. The City will be responsible for the cast of repairs and any such claims, if the claim is related to a main line failure or interruption, unless the Company is determined 10 be at fault under Section 8 below.

Except to the extent provided in Section 8 below or to the extent caused by the negligence or willfhl misconduct of Company, aficr completing the prucedure set forth in this Section, Company shall have no furhw responsibiIity or liability to the citizen or City for the personal injury or property damage caused by the sewer back-up or the consequences thereof.

8. Comva~esponsibilit~ for SSO O~currences. Company will reimburse the City and assume responsibility for SSO occurrences as follows:

8.1 As described in this Amendment, Company will inspect (through CCTV) on a ten-year cycle, clean a specific podion of the Collection System on a four-year cycle and will repair problems discovered during such inspection and cleaning in accordance with provisions of the Capital Improvement; Program. Company shall. not have any responsibility for SSO occurrences .until the particular section of the Collection System has been inspected, cleaned and repaired if necessary at least once during the term of the Agreement. Thereafter, the Company's responsibility will be determined in accordance with Section 8.2 bclow,

8.2 After a section of the Collection System has been inspected, cleaned and repaired if necessary by the Company, the Company's responsibility for a SS~ occurrence in that section of the Collection System will be determined by a third party insurance adjustcr (the "Adjuster") that is selected by mutual agreement of the parties and paid for by the Company's insurance provider. The Adjuster shall be familiar with the terms of this Agreement and shall investigate the $SO or claim.

Such investigation shall include as appropriate relevant information provided by the partics, visits to the SSO site and interviews with &'act witnesses. The Adjuster shall then issue a recommendation, which shall be final ten days after issuance 1467
09/29/2004 WED 14:04 FAX
unless the City andlor the Company have a good faith objection to the recommendation. If the Adjuster's recommendation becomes final and the Company's fault is determined to be the sole cause of the SSO, the costs for repairing and remedying the SSO and any attendant claims shall be pa.id directly by the Company or its insurance carrier (or reimbursed to the City as appropriate).

If the Adjuster's recommendation becomes final and Company's fault is not determined to be the sole cause, the costs for repairing and remedying the SSO and any attendant claims shall be paid directly by the City or its insurance carrier less the partion if any, that is determined to be attributable to the fault of the Company.

The City shall retain ownership of the Collection System and maintain overall ownership responsibility for Collection System. The City shall continue to maintain insurance coveri~ig claims arising from the Collection System, and the City shall continue administering, defending and resolving claims under such insurance progq including making payment in ~lemcnt thereof $ubje~t to the right ta reimbursement fiom Company as provided in Sections 7 and 8 above. In no event will Company be construed as the owner of the Collection System for purposes of asserting or responding to claims arising from the ownership of the Collection System, including, without limitation, strict IiabiIity claims.

8.2.2 Examples of circumstances under which the Company may be determined to be responsible for a SSO occurrence and claim are;
- The Company has not cleaned the portion (after the initial cleaning, televising and repair of the section) of the Collection System experiencing the SSO in the required frequency and there was a blockage in the main line as a
- The Company's action directly resulted in the particular damage to the property such as hydraulic pressurization of a gravity line by the Company that causes damage.
- The failurc ofa lift station related to a mechanical failure of the Iift station that does not constitute an UncontrollabIe Circumstance under the Agreement (after initial capital improvements have been completed).

8.2.3 Examples of circumstances under which the Company will not be determined to be responsible for an SSO occurrence and claim are:
- Dcbris has been discharged or disposed of into the Collection System that results in o $SO occurrence (whether the responsible party is identified or not).
- Grease or other viscous substance causing plugs in the Collection System where the Collection System has bean cleaned by the 1468
08/29/2004 WED 14:04 FAX
Company in the agreed upon frequency (whder thc responsible party is identified or not). - Any backup or blockage (whether or not the cause or responsible party is determined) where the CoIlection System has been cleaned by the Company in the agreed upon frequency. - Manhole lid breaks/flips/open holes and vehicle damage or pedestrian accidents unless the Company has been notified of such event, has not responded within two (2) hours and has failed to remedy the problem within a reasonable time period. - SSO property damage and compliance related to flows exceeding the hydraulic capacity of the system or due to shcturaI failure of the Collection System or design flaws of the CoIIection System. - Structural failures of the Collection System piping and appurtenances. .. Design flaws of the Collection System where the full hydraulic capacity of the system wouId result in property damage (example:
a basement flow drain at the 50% elevation or the Collection System line). - Any damage related to service line plugging or failures.

8. Defects and Undiscovered Adverse Conditions. If during the investigations performed by the Company dwkg the fir~2 two years of this Amendment (i) the Company discovers information about the condition of the Collection System that materially differs fiom the information provided to Company prior to execution of this Amendment and (ii) such informatian substantialIy impacts the ability of the Company to meet the performance objectives described herein or causes a material increase in the operating and maintenance costs incurred by the Company to meet such performance objective, the Company shall be entitled to an equitable adjustment of each and every performance objective impacted by such new information and/or an equitable adjustment in the Annual Fee.

10.1 City shall fund all necessary Capital Improvements required hereunder, including without limitation, Capital Improvements needed to repair or replace the Collection System or to maintain the Collection System in a physical condition that is adequate to provide the service far which the Collection System was designed and constructed. Priority shall be given to meeting regulatory requirements, including safety and health requirements. Any Ioss, damage, or injury resulting from the City's failure to fund and construct Catal Improvements, whether reasonably requested by Compaq ur otherwise, shall be the sclle responsibility of the Cily .

10.2 City shall keep in force all warranties, guarantees, easements, permits and licenses that City may have with respect to the Collection System. 1469
09/29/2004 WED 14:05 FAX

10.3 City shall pay all sales, excise, vulr~mrn, property, franchise, oc~upational and disposal taxes, or other taxes associated with the Capital Improvements program, if any, other than taxes imposed upon Company's net income andor payroll taxes for Company employees. In the event Company is required to pay any sales tax or use taxes on he value of the services provided by Company hereunder or lhe services provided by any subcontractor of Company, such payments shall be reimbursed by City, unless City hrnishes a valid and properly executed exemption certificate relieving City and Company of the obligation for such taxes.

Jn the event City hishes an exemption certificate which is invalid or not applicable to services by Company, City shall indemnify Company for any taxes, interest, penalties, ad increment costs, expenses or fees which it may incur as a result of Company's reliance on such certificate.

10.4 Consistent with the Company's Safety and Security Plan, the City shall provide the Collection System with appropriate devices to protect against any losses resulting from the theft, damage, or unauthorized use of property owned by the City and shall accept liability for such losses, cxcept to the extent such losses are directly caused by the negligent acts or omissions of Company.

10.5 City shall provide far Company's exclusive use of a11 City vehicles and equipment presently used for operating the Collection System. City shall provide Company with maintenance records, current upon the commencement date of this Amendment, on all such vehicles. City shall continue to provide and maintain a11 property insurance, registrations and Iicenses for City's vehicles and equipment used in connection with the Collection System as listed in Exhibit E.

10.6 Company shall be entitled to an equitable adjustment of its perfixmance obligations and compensation in the event that the condition of the Collection ' System is materially different than during the period between the initial. inspection of the Collection System by Company and the commencement date of the Amendment.

30.7 City shall provide all traffic control I-equired for the cleaning, televising, repairing and rnaintemn~e of the Collection System as required by the Company, including Police Service as needed to pruvide a safe working condition for those engaged in such work and the general public.

9.7 City shall provide and pay for disposal costs, including landfill tipping fees, for all material, removed fbm the City's Collection System as a result of cleaning, maintaining, televising or repair of the system.

9.7 City shall provide equipment and funding for odor control and corrosion control systems recommended by the Company and approved by the City. Such equipment may consist of chemical scrubbers, bio-filters, liquid chemical addition or other systems as tnay be needed to eliminate or control odors and corrosion originating in the Collection System.
1470
09/29/2004 WED 14:05 FAX
I

9.7 City shall provide all permitting and regulatory monitoring and reporting reluted to the CSO discharges and all storm water discharges (currently provided by the City Induslrial Pretreatment Propnl staff). City shall, retain all responsibility and liability for the CSO discharges and all storm water discharges sub-ject to the Company's agreement hersunder to operate the flow monitoring deviccs related to the CSO as part of the overdl operation of the Collection System.

10.11 Early Termination - Should thc City decide to terninate this Agreement with Company prior to the end of its term for any reason, City shall pay to Compmy the amount shown in Exhibit F to reimburse the Company the costs of start-up, mobilization and dernobili~ation for the work described in the Amendment in addition to any other amount owed to Company by the City under the Agreement.

11. Effective Datc, Start Date and Term. This Amcndrnent shall talce effect upon thc date first entered above unless otherwise provided for herein. Company shall begin c~perations of the Collection System on October 15, 2004, or earlier as mutually agrced and the Company shall continue such operations until the Agreement is terminated in accord-dnce with the lcms of the Agreement.

Ap~lication of Terms. 'l'he performance and compensation rights and obligations contained in this Amendment am exclusive and shall control with respect to the Collection System services to be performed under this Amendmcnt. Unless otherwise specifically agreed to by the parties in this Amendment, nothing in the Agreement pertaining to the Facility shall reduce the compensation owed to Company for performing the Collection System services described in this Amendment or increase the costs to Company of performing thc Collection System serviccs described in this hmcndrnenl.

Subject to the above requirement, the terns of the Agreement shall apply equally to the services performed under this Amendmcnt, including wihout limitation, the terms of Articlcs VII pertaining to Liability, Insurance, Uncontrollable Circumstances and Indemnification thc tcrms of Article VITT uT the Agreemelit pertaining to Events of Default,, Remedies and Termination. Unless otherwise stated herein, the provisions of Articles IV, V and VT and Schedulc 8 of the Ageernent shall not apply to Collection System services performed undcr this Amendment,
13, All terms of the Ageernent not ~pecifically amended or modified by this instrument shall rcmain unmodified and in full force and effect. The terms of this Amendment rgrescnt the entire agreement bctween the City and the Company with respect 20 the Collection System and supersede all prior verbal or written representations, statements, understandings or agreements with respcct to the subject matter of this Amendment. Any waiver, modification or amendment of the terns of this Amendment shall he effective vnly i fin writing and sigued by an authorized representative of each party hcrcto.

WHEREFORE, both partics indicate their ~pprovd of this Amendment by their signature below and each party warrants that dl. action necessary to bind the parties to the terms uT this Agreement has been taken.
1471
09/29/2004 WED 14:05 FAX
City of Richmond, California Veolia Water North America Operating Services, Inc.

BYB
Print Name: R~QM d tf~ YCq Pri u
Title: Hrr~i-har Llry IYflN~re~ Title: JBni f' / Cn
- I 0
1472
09/29/2004 WED 14:06 FAX
Task Description
NXEIBrn A

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Totals
Sewer System Investigations (Pre-Engineering, Exhibit
A B)
$7 93.21 1
B Enhanced Sanitary and Stormwater Program $5,887,594
The following tasks represent some of the primary components that a sanitary and stormwater program a city the size of Richmond should consist of.

Only those items that am necessary far the ongoing operation of the two systems will be transferred to the operating budget as funds become available:

State-of-the art equipment
Deferred maintenance
Regular system cleaning and televising
Deferred system cleaning and televising
Vehicle replacement
C Capital Work to be Performed
1473
09/29/2004 WED 14:08 FAX
PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE ENGTNEERlNG SERVICES
JUNE 11,2004
1474
09/29/2004 WED 14:08 FAX

EXHJEIT C

ANNUAL FEE
Annual Fee at Amendment Commencement Date
Annual Fee Starting 24 Months Mer Amendment
Commencement Date, (including the transfer of
elements of the Enhanced Sanitary and Stormwater
Program included in Exhibit A to the. Annual Fee)
.- -
$1,334,190
$2,997,671
1475
09/29/2004 WED 14:06 FAX
EXBlBTT D
EMPLOYEES ELIGIBILE ROR BUY-OUT OF'F'ER PER SECTION 5.4 Costs Based on Richmond Sanitary 8 Storm Collections
Staff Information as of March 8,2004

51.7% City benefrt rate includes vacation, sick leave, holiday, medical, dental, vision, professional development, retirement (employer and employee costs). LTD. Life insurance 8 workmans comp. 1476
4 N
0 m
lq UJW y~ru~ xoq A!!Inn hay JaAoqa3
IPEA au!loseB-~ope~ Apaq~ad
lasa!P PJod
saxoq ioq 41W ~aqfiual
PaqVWs
asy ad!d pue JLL
01s
DOD81
OOSZ
0091
L COL60 LAEZSCXd611 A
9LOZZVAU L30LHXCld 1
(NIA peq e anowl Z6&E-i6!8
fl e eq Plnm S-gtrPP€VAr€lVZ8MACJd C
E 1929 CElN8HPZ3033 &
89589CZNCHPC3CI39C
de3
06 LZ JoPeA
00 1 Z JWRA
OOCZJWeA
laa!€I PJod
JPPPO~ JW~-AH
lm!Q
$66 L
886 C
266 C - Z66l
S-LLLEOVL6
08-13
08-1 J
08-1J
H/H1080WCH
sWaF
eya ~oj ho
~uewd!nba ue s
UaAup JO
Je y sem arn
~~l~Jeuq
qeus ~m
L69Ot8HA9BB~t3Ad L
90i0P8HA988WXAd C
9690PBHAB88r~0U 1

ELLCOB-LYUM
r
y3n~Nwna jasa!~
~ru~duna lasera
.ral!e~l hea~ a~xv luapel
14 'oPuW03uls~n3
~1 '~swew~ ~aweu~~n ue~ AI
W
2 IaS-uW P=!P M)1 0SE
CQ
0 uogdr~3 sw . .
p
Japp
luawd~
s!seua 3 w
DOOZ
ODD2
0002
-
00087
DCZClaPW06U13d
890P6
lapow
a
----
-
€6LZZYAl4S3Z8M(Cl ZI L
CS6E0'2~dB~CH90CI~I
6C9S 1 1 WZ9dPC3HB3E
€5ZZ09l'U6rlHLUVCl3 C
EO1ZDf~klC~lHiYUCl3L
WZ8§ CZ
NIA
$66 C
€66 C
ZOOZ
P66 C
P66L
lea^
1477
09/29/2004 WED 14:07 FAX
. 8
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
TASK

AUTHORIZATION
HDS "Hydrodynamic Separator Cleaning" Date: September 25, 2024 Activity Classification VWNA Project #: 24905
Administration
Engineering Proposed by:

Planning Mitchell Hendricks, Veolia Water Operating Services Design
Construction Reviewed by:

Construction Troy McCoy, Veolia Water Operating Services Sanitary Sewer
Storm Sewer X Reviewed by:

Sanitary P.S. Jeff Barich, Authorized City Dept. Rep. (PO verification) Storm P.S.

Wastewater Approved by:

City of Richmond, Finance Department
Other (specify below)
Approved by:

Daniel Chavarria
City of Richmond, Director of Public works
Approval Date:

Original Line Item Approved Cost: ($ 499,408.91)
Subtotal ($ 499,408.91)
Approved Markup/Margin ($ 49,940.89)
Total Authorized Amt.: ($ 549,349.80)
Scope of Services
This Proposal is for the cleaning of four Hydrodynamic Separator units. Each Unit will be cleaned twice in the next year.

Attachments
Proposal from Dig Alert Done Right
Troy McCoy (Sep 25, 2024 12:44 PDT)
Troy McCoy
1491
Dated:
2501 Earlmar Dr
Modesto, CA 95350
800-921-1177
VOSB, MBE, EZ8 SBA
DATE: 9/24/2024
REFERENCE #:

Everett Jackson
Prepared By: Everett Jackson
9/24/2024

ESTIMATE
APPROVED BY:

DIG ALERT DONE RIGHT LLC. Dba Hydro Pros (VOSB,MBE, EZ8 SBA) PREPARED BY:
www.hydrovacdigging.com 1492 1 of 2
Company: Phone (o) 510-660-7942 Phone (m):

Contact: E-mail:

Office Address:

Billing Address:

Price UM Qty Amount
$ 55,550.00 /ea 2 $ 111,100.00
$ -
$ 91,500.00 /ea 2 $ 183,000.00
$ -
$ 72,150.00 /ea 2 $ 144,300.00
$ -
$ 30,255.00 2 $ 60,510.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ - $ -
0% $ -
Sub Total Estimate $ 498,910.00
FFR Fee $ 498.91
Total Cost Estimate $ 499,408.91
Company: PO#:

Name (please print): Title:

Signature: Date:

Scope of Work
Description
8th Street Richmond, CA (* To be completed two times per year) Please note all work will be done on a time and materials basis on a port to port basis.. All work will be done under the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. 3280 Regatta Blvd. Richmond, CA (* To be completed two times per year) VEOLIA
I am authorized to bind the Company
305 Cutting Blvd. Richmond, CA (* To be completed two times per year) Pierson Blvd (PG&E) Richmond, CA (* To be completed two times per year) All rates are subject to energy & security surcharges variable from >12% 305 Cutting Blvd. Richmond, CA / 3280 Regatta Blvd. Richmond CA / 8th Street Richmond, CA - DADR will provide Hydro Vac units, Combo sewer flushing units, Traffic control, Technicians and all applicable safety items in accordance with the Scope of Work. The SOW will consist of carefully and correctly cleaning all HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATOR UNITS. All confined space teams will be Hazwoper 40 certfied. DADR will work closely with both VEOLIA North America and Cal Trans to ensure the safety of both contractor and the public. All work will be conducted during daylight hours unless specified by VEOLIA North America that the scope has moved to an Emergency Response effort. Tidal reports will be adhered to and posted prior to negotiating underground vaults near or adjacent to the Bay. Estimate is FINAL and set as NTE for the purpose of bidding. [email protected]
8201 Fruitridge Rd. Sacramento, CA 95826
Mitchell Hendricks
(if different than above)
www.hydrovacdigging.com 1493 2 of 2
Hydrodynamic - Revised
Final Audit Report 2024-09-25
Created: 2024-09-25
By: Thomas Stickles ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA6qmtT83nYuHPPXeP1J2Mg-AVqb25qzy9 "Hydrodynamic - Revised" History
Document created by Thomas Stickles ([email protected]) 2024-09-25 - 7:35:14 PM GMT
Document emailed to Mitchell Hendricks ([email protected]) for signature 2024-09-25 - 7:35:18 PM GMT
Document emailed to Troy McCoy ([email protected]) for signature 2024-09-25 - 7:35:18 PM GMT
Email viewed by Mitchell Hendricks ([email protected]) 2024-09-25 - 7:38:59 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Mitchell Hendricks ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024-09-25 - 7:39:10 PM GMT - Time Source: server Email viewed by Troy McCoy ([email protected])
2024-09-25 - 7:43:54 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Troy McCoy ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024-09-25 - 7:44:33 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2024-09-25 - 7:44:33 PM GMT
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
01/26/2024
1510
1511
1512

CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY

COLLEGE DISTRICT
1513

OVERVIEW
• About Us
• Backward Glance
• Current and Future Stance
• California Community Colleges
Landscape
1514
Transforming Our Communities 1515
• Created in December 1948, the first countywide
junior college district in the state
• Celebrating our 75 years as Contra
Costa Community College District
• County population
 1949: Approx. 249K residents
 2024: Approx. 1.16M residents
• The District currently serves over 50,000
students annually
A few facts about us…
1516
Founded by a
public vote in
December
1948.

LMC Established
New Brentwood
CCC Opens Center Opens
East Contra Costa
Junior College
opens, 1952 site
moved to Pleasant
Hill, Diablo Valley College name
adopted in 1958.

San Ramon Valley
Center opens in
November of 2006.

San Ramon
Campus name
adopted in 2011.
1948 1949 1949 1974 2006 2021
1517
John E. Márquez
Ward 1
Dr. Judy E. Walters
Ward 2
Rebecca Barrett
Ward 3
Andy Li
Ward 4
Fernando Sandoval
Ward 5
Halena Neyazi
Student Trustee
1518
Who We Serve: 4CD Demographics
1519
Who We Serve: CCC Demographics
1520
• More than 220 associate degrees and 330 certificates
• 81 transfer pathways with guaranteed admission into
California State Universities
• Career training and industry-recognized credentials
• Flexible schedules with day, evening, and weekend
classes
• Online, in-person, and hybrid classes and programs
What We Offer
1521
• FREE Tuition Programs
20,712 students received FREE tuition in 2023-
2024
• Classes with Reduced or No-Cost Textbooks
• Wellness Centers to Meet Basic Needs
Food Pantries
Online Mental and Health Services
Technology Loan Programs
Our Commitment: Affordability and Access
1522
Students access 4CD colleges from multiple entry points with a range of goals. 4CD Colleges as the Educational Hub
High
Schools
Adult
Schools
Community
4CD
Colleges
4-Year
Colleges
Workforce
Workforce Boards
Community Partners
Adult Learners
Job Seekers and
Life-Long Learners
Transfer & Return
for Needed Credits
Skills Building &
Career Advancement
Early College
Credit Students
1523
10,000 23,000
2,500
10,000
3,000
Contra Costa
College Diablo Valley
College
DVC
San Ramon
Campus
Los Medanos
College
LMC
Brentwood
Campus
2022-2023 annual unduplicated headcount
2024 State of the District Presentation
Partnership Highlight: Local High Schools
1524
Partnership Highlight: Transfer Institutions
1525
Funding Per Full-Time Equivalent Student
22-23 23-24
K-12 $18,665 $20,158
CA Community
Colleges
$12,605 $13,278
Cal State
University
$20,385 $22,217
University of
California
$34,485 $34,996
1526
• 2014 Measure E is approx. 95% spent. The final $110
million authorization was sold in 2022
• Strong Bond Rating of AA+ (S&P) and Aa1 (Moody's)
with a positive outlook affirmed in 2024
• The District refinanced prior bond sales ($402M) as a measure of fiscal stewardship, successfully saving
taxpayers $44 million
• 4CD continues to monitor existing bonds for
opportunities to save taxpayers money
Bond Issuance & Financial Stewardship
1527
• Over $463 million annual budget (includes Bond Measure funds)
• Board required reserve of at least two months of operating expenses
 2023-24 unrestricted reserves of $70.4 million or 26.42% of expenditure budget
 Continued clean audit findings for District operations and bond measures
Strong Fiscal Health: Financial Highlights
1528
• 2.1 Million Students across 116 Colleges – Largest
System of Public Higher Education in the Nation
and the World
• 51% of CSU and 21% of UC graduates started at a
community college
• More than 70% of California Community College
Students are of ethnically diverse backgrounds
California’s Community College System
1529
4CD Economic Impact
1530
Q & A
1531
October 30, 2024
City of Richmond Mayor Eduardo Martinez and
City Councilmembers

RICHMOND CITY HALL
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
RE: Presentation of Draft Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan Dear Mayor Martinez and Councilmembers:

On behalf of the West Contra Costa Transportation Commission (WCCTC), we are pleased to share with you the Draft Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan (RPTP). Working in partnership with the City of Richmond and Contra Costa County, WCCTC applied for and received a $562,650 transportation planning grant in 2022 from Caltrans to work with the County and City of Richmond to develop a cross-jurisdictional, transportation plan for the Richmond Parkway.

Throughout its development process, the WCCTC Board received regular updates on the progress of the development of the plan. Simultaneously, this planning effort has also utilized a Public Advisory Group (PAG) composed of representatives from community and business organizations, as well as its own Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) composed of staff from a wide range of relevant public agencies. To date, there have also been two public outreach phases to gather public comment. These have included pop-up events, community meetings, online advertising in Spanish and English, e-newsletters, and web-based surveys.

During the first week of November, the draft RPTP, enclosed, will be available on the WCCTC webpage (https://www.westcontracostatc.gov/), and a third and final phase of public outreach will begin. In addition to online advertising, WCCTC staff will provide the PAG, TAC, and WCCTC Board with sample text that contains information about the draft plan and a link to it and an online survey, which can be used in community e-newsletters and websites. Comments on the draft plan may be submitted until approximately November 29, 2024. 1532
The WCCTC Board received a presentation on the Draft RPTP on October 25, 2024 and in the coming months, the plan will be shared directly with the County Board of Supervisor’s Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee, and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Board. For the Richmond City Council, members of the project team will deliver the PowerPoint presentation attached to this letter.

In January, the Final Draft Plan will return to WCCTC, the County Board of Supervisors and the Richmond City Council for final acceptance.

Should you have any questions about the RPTP, please feel free to contact me at the email address below.

Sincerely,
Leah Greenblat
Transportation Planning Manager, WCCTC
[email protected]
Enclosures
w:\new file org\studies, projects, programs & plans\multi-modal\richmond parkway corridor\meetings\richmond city council\2024-10-30 draft plan presentation cover ltr.docx
1533

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
November 19, 2024
www.WestContraCostaTC.gov
Richmond City Council
Meeting
Draft Plan Presentation
Project Overview and Priority Strategies
1534
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan 2
Project
Organization WCCTC
1535
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
01 02
03 04
3 Agenda
Project Overview
Priority Strategies
Funding & Implementation
Next Steps
1536
4 RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Project Overview
1537
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
Review of Project
Corridor
• Includes Richmond Parkway and
Castro Street between I-580 and I-80
• Falls within City of Richmond and
Unincorporated Contra Costa County
• Local and regional connector
• Includes segments of the Bay Trail
• Impacts Equity Priority Communities
• Planned industrial and residential
growth
1538
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan 6
Schedule
Phase 3
Opportunities for
Public Input
WCCTC
1539
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
• PAG Mtg #4
• WCCTC Board Mtg #4
• Digital engagement
Public Engagement Plan
7 Phase 1
• 3 Pop-up events and 3
community meetings
• Digital engagement
• WCCTC Board Mtg #2
• PAG Mtg #2
Phase 2
• PAG Mtg #3
• WCCTC Board Mtg #3
• 2 Pop-up events and 4
community meetings
• Digital engagement
Phase 3

IDENTIFY NEEDS EXPLORE STRATEGIES REFINE SOLUTIONS
1540
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan 8
We reached a broad range of community members
71 people were
Spanish speakers
5 Pop-ups
With 142 people
providing feedback
3 online
engagement tools
With 253 responses
ES from 211 contributors
7 Community Meetings
• North Richmond Municipal Advisory Council (2)
• Parchester Village Neighborhood Council (2)
• Iron Triangle Neighborhood Council (2)
• City of Richmond District 2 Meeting (1)
1541
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan 9
We used community input to develop and confirm
strategies
22%
19%
17%
16%
14%
12%
Pop-Up Votes by Category
27%
23%
15%
13%
11%
11%
Online Survey Votes by Category1

1. Online survey respondents skew Whiter and
wealthier than residents living along the Parkway.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024
1542
10 RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Priority Strategies
1543
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
Strategies Categories
11 The strategies are
designed to be
responsive to the Plan’s
goals and the needs
identified through
existing conditions
analysis and community
engagement findings.

Public Health
Strategies that reduce
truck cut-through traffic
and reduce or capture
vehicle emissions.

Safety
Strategies that reduce
vehicle speeds and
address intersection
conflict points.

Walking and Biking
Strategies that support
comfortable walking and
biking on the Parkway and
the Bay Trail.

Driving and Goods
Movement
Strategies that
encourage carpooling,
optimize signal timing,
and improve wayfinding
for drivers.

Maintenance
Strategies that holistically
address corridor and Bay
Trail maintenance and
reduce illegal dumping.

Transit
Strategies that improve
access and circulation at
the Richmond Parkway
Transit Center and
encourage transit
ridership.
1544
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
The Priority Strategies Respond to Community
Feedback and Meet Many or Most Goals
12 Goals of the Plan
Advance
Placemaking
Enhance Travel Time
Reliability and
Efficiency
Improve Safety
for All Users
Increase Access to Improve Health
Key Destinations
Support Feasible
Strategies
All priority strategies
meet at least many of the
goals.

Meets Some Goals
Meets Many Goals
Meets Most Goals
1545
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
Priority Strategies
13 Category Cost Strategy
Public
Health
$$$$ A Incorporate trees and greening into all infrastructure projects on the corridor $ B Update designated truck routes to avoid residential areas to the extent feasible $ C Implement no truck idling or parking zones near sensitive land uses Safety
$$$$ D Install safety treatments at intersections along the corridor $ E Implement measures to reduce speeding and lower the speed limit Walking and
Biking
$$$$ F Upgrade bikeways and the Bay Trail and connect sidewalk gaps $$ G Install at-grade signalized Wildcat Creek Trail crossing Maintenance $$$$ H Implement a cross-jurisdictional Roadway Pavement and Maintenance Management Program Driving &
Goods
Movement
$$$ I Upgrade and coordinate signals along the Parkway
Transit $$ J Improve access to the Richmond Parkway Transit Center $$$: $6-$10M
$$$$: >$11M
$: <$1M
$$: $2-$5M
*Strategies with bold black text to be implemented by City of Richmond Key:
1546
14 RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Funding and Implementation
1547
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan 15
Priority Strategies Implementation
Action
Priority
Strategies Immediate Steps Future Steps
Advance design concept for
northern segment
A D E
F G J
Pursue funding sources that cover multiple
strategy categories to finalize design and
construct project.

Pursue funding to develop
concepts for remaining
segments of the Parkway
and Bay Trail.

Implement new truck routes B
Assess existing staffing and funding capacity
to advance planning component. Apply for funding if needed. Prohibit truck parking and idling C
Implement Roadway
Maintenance Management
Program
H
Confirm the City and County’s interest in
pursuing the action by approving an MOU to
advance the program.

Negotiate agreement and
determine guidelines for
program development.

Upgrade and coordinate
traffic signals I
Confirm recommendations in the 2019
Program for Arterial System Synchronization
(PASS) Report.

Apply for funding.
1548
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan 16
Priority Strategies Implementation
Action
Priority
Strategies Immediate Steps Future Steps
Implement Roadway
Maintenance Management
Program
H
Confirm the City and County’s interest in
pursuing the action by approving an MOU to
advance the program.

Negotiate agreement and
determine guidelines for
program development.
1549
Lead agencies can explore both existing and new
potential sources of funding
17 Existing Sources
• Federal, State, and regional grant
funding sources, such as the:
• RAISE Grant
• Local Highway Safety Improvement Program
• Local Partnership Programs
• Regional Measure 3
• One Bay Area Grant Program
Potential New Sources
• Countywide Transportation Sales
Tax
• Regional Measures such as sales tax,
property tax, or increased tolls
• Enhance Infrastructure Financing
District
• Benefit Assessment District
1550
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
RM3
18 Regional Measure 3 is a Bay
Area-wide regional measure
funded via increased bridge
tolls that funds transportation
projects included in the
expenditure plan.

RM3 funds a package of 35 projects and programs, including Richmond Parkway designated funds. In addition, active transportation Parkway projects may be competitive for Safe Routes to Transit and Bay Trail funding pot under RM3; however, that category prioritizes access to rail transit.

Regional Measure 3 (RM3)
Source: KQED (2023)
Current Source
1551
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
Countywide
Transportation
Sales Tax
19 A new Contra Costa
transportation sales tax could
generate stable funding for
capital and operating uses laid
out in an Expenditure Plan.

Requires 2/3 voter support.

Tax revenues from Contra Costa’s Measure J, approved by voters in 2004, funds an Expenditure Plan of transportation program and projects, such as the Smart Signals Project.

Contra Costa County Measure J
Source: Smart Signal Project, Contra Costa Transportation Authority (2024) Potential New Sources
1552
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
Regional
Measure
20 A new Bay Area-wide regional
measure - such as a sales tax,
property tax or further
increased tolls - could fund
transportation projects
included in an expenditure
plan.

A new transportation revenue measure for the Bay Area is being crafted and may be on a future ballot as early as November 2026. The measure is expected to generate at least $1 billion annually and is currently considering a wide range of options for its revenue source.

Potential Regional Transportation Measure for 2026
Source: Transform (2024); MTC (2024).

Potential New Sources
1553
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
Enhanced
Infrastructure
Financing District
(EIFD)
21 EIFDs use tax increment financing
(TIF) to reallocate a portion of future
property taxes to fund infrastructure
projects. A separate government
entity can be created to finance
infrastructure projects with
community-wide benefits.

The City of Placentia and County of Orange was the first city/county partnership to form an EIFD in 2019. The EIFD was formed to fund transit-supportive infrastructure in the communities near the upcoming Placentia Metrolink Station.

City of Placentia/County of Orange EIFD
Source: City of Placentia EIFD StoryMap, SCAG (2024)
Potential New Sources
1554
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
Benefits
Assessment
Districts
22 Benefit Assessment Districts
are established for a specific
geographic area where
impacted parcel owners vote
to tax themselves to fund
infrastructure benefits like
street lighting and
maintenance.

City of Richmond’s Hilltop Landscape Maintenance Assessment District provides maintenance and landscaping services in the northern area of Richmond, such as this section of Lakeside Drive just south of Richmond Parkway.

City of Richmond’s Hilltop Landscape Maintenance
Assessment District
Source: Google Maps (2022)
Potential New Sources
1555
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
Discussion
23 1. Which of the priority
strategies do you think are
most important to
implement?

2. Do the priority strategies
all seem like realistic
options for the City/County
to explore, particularly the
Maintenance program?

3. Are there other funding
options that should be
considered?

4. Which option should be
prioritized?
Potential New Funding
Sources

1. Countywide
Transportation Sales
Tax

2. Regional Measure

3. EIFD

4. Benefit Assessment
District
Strategy Cost
Sales
Tax
Regional
Measure EIFD BAD
A. Trees and Green Infrastructure $$$$ x x x
B. Implement New Truck Routes $ x
C. No Truck Parking and Idling Zones $ x
D. Safety Improvements at Intersections $$$$ x x
E. Reduce Speeding $ x x
F. Upgrade Bikeways and Paths $$$$ x x x
G. On-Street Wildcat Creek Trail crossing $$ x x x
H. Roadway Maintenance Program $$$$ x x x x
I. Upgrade and Coordinate Traffic
Signals $$$ x x
J. Richmond Parkway Transit Center
Access $$ x x x
$: <$1M $$: $2-$5M $$$: $6-$10M $$$$: >$11M
Key:
1556
24 RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Next Steps
1557
Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan
Next Steps
25 Nov Dec
Present to County
Board of Supervisors
Transportation,
Water, and
Infrastructure
Committee, 12/9
Prepare the Final
Draft Plan
Jan
Present to CCTA
Board, date TBD
City of Richmond,
Contra Costa County,
and WCCTC Adopt
Final Plan
Lead agencies to
initiate immediate
actions for
implementing
priority strategies
Feb
Release Public
Review Draft online
Present to Richmond
City Council, 11/19
1558
26 Thank you
TO LEARN MORE VISIT:

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN www.WestContraCostaTC.gov

FOR ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR
INFORMATION CONTACT:

Leah Greenblat
Transportation Planning Manager
[email protected]
1559

RICHMOND

PARKWAY
Transportation Plan

DRAFT PLAN
NOVEMBER 2024
Study funded by Caltrans Sustainable Communities Grant
1560

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Study funded by Caltrans Sustainable Communities Grant #74A1366 West Contra Costa
Transportation
Commission
(WCCTC)
WCCTC Staff
Leah Greenblat
John Nemeth
Coire Reilly
WCCTC Board
Rita Xavier, Chair
Anthony Tave, Vice Chair
Chris Kelley
Eduardo Martinez
Paul Fadelli
Jovanka Beckles
Rebecca Saltzman
Tom Hansen
John Gioia
Soheila Bana, Alternate
Doria Robinson, Alternate
Claudia Jimenez, Alternate
Chris Peeples, Alternate
Cesar Zepeda, Former
Project Team
Fehr & Peers
Karina Schneider, AICP
Carrie Modi, AICP
Gaby Picado-Aguilar
Amy Deng
Minnie Chen
ESA
Beverly Choi
Shannon Wages
Stephanie Cadena
NCE
Ryan Shafer, PE, GE
Myles Goins, PE
*Project Partners
Technical Advisory Committee
City of Richmond*
Daniel Chavarria
Robert Armijo
Hector Rojas
Hillal Hamdan
Lina Velasco
Denee Evans, Former
Contra Costa County*
Emily Warming,
Public Health
Daniel Barrios, Conservation
and Development
Adam Scarbrough,
Conservation and
Development
Jamar Stamps,
Transportation Planning
Samantha Harris,
Transportation Planning
Sonia Bustamante,
Board of Supervisors
Contra Costa
Transportation
Authority
Matt Kelly
Stephanie Hu
Hisham Noeimi
Metropolitan
Transportation
Commission
Lee Huo
Michelle Go
Dee Dohm
Caltrans
Issa Ibrahimi
Becky Frank
Bay Area Air Quality
Management District
Samuel De Perio Garcia
East Bay Regional
Parks District
Sean Dougan
West County
Wastewater District
Joseph Neugebauer
City of San Pablo
Allan Panganiban
City of Pinole
Sanjay Mishra
Faby Guillen
Kapil Amin
Misha Kaur, Former
AC Transit
Jim Cunradi
Michael Eshleman
WestCAT
Robert Thompson
BART
Rachel Factor
Public Advisory Group
Port of Richmond
Lucy Zhou
Lizeht Zepeda
Richmond
Neighborhood
Coordinating Council
Arto Rintella
Trails for Richmond
Action Committee
Bruce Beyaert
Urban Tilth
Latifah Abdullah
Watershed Project
Juliana Gonzalez
Naama Raz-Yaseef
Groundwork Richmond
Salma Berumen
Sarah Calderon
Bike East Bay
Robert Prinz
Dani Lanis
North Richmond
Municipal Advisory
Council
Don Gilmore
Community Housing
Development
Corporation
Darrell Davis
Bay Area Outreach and
Recreation Program
Emily Seelenfreund
California Trucking
Association
Bernice Creager
2 1561

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Click on a chapter to navigate to its corresponding page.

1. Introduction.....................................................................................................5

2. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................11

3. Engagement...................................................................................................35

4. Strategies .......................................................................................................47

5. Priority Strategies ..........................................................................................57

6. Implementation and Funding .......................................................................81

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Community Engagement Summary Memos
Appendix B: Separated Bikeway 35% Design Concept for Northern Segment of Richmond Parkway
Appendix C: Existing Funding Sources for Priority Strategies Appendix D: Priority Strategy Cost Estimates
Appendix E: Overview of Regional Influence
3 1562

FIGURES
Figure 1: Plan Timeline ................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 2: Jurisdictions in Study Area............................................................................................ 8 Figure 3: Map of Study Corridor ................................................................................................... 9 Figure 4: Corridor Population Characteristics ........................................................................... 12 Figure 5: Map of Equity Priority Areas in Study Area ................................................................. 13 Figure 6: KSI Collisions by Year, 2011-2020 ................................................................................ 14 Figure 7: Map of 85th Percentile 7PM-6AM Weekday Speeds.................................................... 16 Figure 8: Map of KSI Collisions ................................................................................................... 17 Figure 9: Map of High Injury Networks....................................................................................... 19 Figure 10: Map of Existing and Proposed Bikeways .................................................................... 21 Figure 11: Map of Slowdowns During 7-9AM and 4-6PM Peak Periods....................................... 24 Figure 12: Map of Northbound Daily Truck Distribution ............................................................. 26 Figure 13: Map of Southbound Daily Truck Distribution............................................................. 27 Figure 14: Map of Pollution Burden in Study Area....................................................................... 29 Figure 15: Map of Asthma Rate in Study Area .............................................................................. 31 Figure 16: Map of Transit Routes in Study Area ........................................................................... 33 Figure 17: Map of Richmond Parkway Transit Center Existing Conditions................................. 34 Figure 18: Distribution of Need-Related Topics Heard................................................................ 41 Figure 19: Distribution of Draft Strategy Category Votes............................................................. 45 Figure 20: Strategy Categories...................................................................................................... 48 Figure 21: Goals Alignment Ranking ............................................................................................ 49 Figure 22: Map of Existing Truck Routes....................................................................................... 60 Figure 23: Intersection Safety Recommendations ....................................................................... 65 Figure 24: Intersection Safety Recommendations (Cont.)........................................................... 66 Figure 25: Sidewalk Gaps and Recommended Bikeways............................................................. 71 Figure 26: Proposed Signalized Crossing at Wildcat Creek Trail.................................................. 73 TABLES
Table 1: Qualitative Goal Alignment Metrics ............................................................................ 49 Table 2: Full List of Strategies.................................................................................................... 50 Table 3: Priority Strategies ........................................................................................................ 58 Table 4: Priority Strategies Implementation Plan .................................................................... 82 Table 5: Priority Strategies Implementation Next Steps .......................................................... 84 4 1563
Introduction
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
Wide intersection at Richmond Parkway and Lakeside Drive. 1564

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

ABOUT THIS PLAN
The focus of the plan is a set of
targeted strategies for WCCTC and
partner agencies to advance in the
next 10 years. The strategies were
developed in close collaboration with
project partners, technical advisors,
and members of the public and are
responsive to both the Plan-identified
transportation needs (summarized in
Chapter 2) and feedback received via
public engagement (summarized in
Chapter 3). The strategies (summarized
in Chapter 4) are projects, programs, and
policies that collectively aim to address
the following six goals of the Plan:

IMPROVE SAFETY FOR ALL
USERS

ADVANCE PLACEMAKING

INCREASE ACCESS TO KEY

DESTINATIONS

ENHANCE TRAVEL

TIME RELIABILITY AND

EFFICIENCY

IMPROVE HEALTH

SUPPORT FEASIBLE

STRATEGIES
Plan Goals

THE RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION
PLAN (“PLAN”) DEVELOPS A STRATEGIC

VISION FOR THE FUTURE OF THIS MAJOR

MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL ROADWAY BETWEEN
I-580 AND I-80, EXTENDING TO FITZGERALD
AVENUE.
6 1565
Introduction
Figure 1: Plan Timeline
2023 2024
Mar Jun Sept Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec
2025
Mar
Info Gathering and
Analysis
Outreach and
Participation
Dra Strategies
Strategy Prioritization
Implementation and
Financing Strategy
Dra and Final Plan
Plan Adoption by WCCTC
and Project Partners
Of the full list of strategies, ten are
considered priority strategies for WCCTC
and partner agencies to implement. These
priority strategies best align with the Plan
goals and reflect engagement participant
preferences. The priority strategies are
described in Chapter 5, including the
lead implementation agency, goals
alignment, benefits, and graphics of the
top strategies. Chapter 6 introduces the
implementation time frame and funding
sources for the priority strategies.

Figure 1 shows the project timeline,
which spanned nearly two years between
March 2023 and January 2025.

Photo: Bicyclists crossing the wide intersection
at Richmond Parkway and W Ohio Avenue.
7 1566

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

THE STUDY AREA
Richmond Parkway is a major road
linking I-80 and I-580 and a primary route
connecting to the the Richmond-San Rafael
Bridge. The Parkway is located in both
the City of Richmond and unincorporated
Contra Costa County (North Richmond),
as shown in Figure 2. Combined with
Castro Street, a parallel roadway at
the southern end of the corridor, the
study corridor is approximately nine
miles in length. At the northeastern
end in the City of Pinole, Richmond
Parkway becomes Fitzgerald Avenue.

It serves many functions of regional and
local importance: a goods movement
(truck and rail) corridor connecting to
the Port of Richmond and local industrial
uses, a regional commuter corridor, a
critical segment of the San Francisco Bay
Trail—a 500-mile long regional walking
and biking path network looping around
San Francisco Bay—and a connector to
the Richmond Parkway Transit Center
served by AC Transit and WestCAT.

Richmond Parkway intersects Wildcat
Creek and is adjacent to several nearby
schools and parks, including Point Pinole
Regional Park. As shown in Figure 3,
industrial land uses line most of the
corridor, particularly along Castro Street
and along the Parkway in North Richmond.

The Parkway also serves residential
areas in Atchison Village, Iron Triangle,
North Richmond, and near Hilltop. As
new industrial and residential growth
continues along the Parkway, this Plan
presents an opportunity to design for
better corridor access and mobility before
existing challenges are exacerbated.

Richmond Parkway and Castro Street
travel through the City of Richmond and
unincorporated Contra Costa County for
A third of the corridor is adjacent to the
Bay Trail.
9 MILES. Created by ARISO
from the Noun Project
Figure 2: Jurisdictions in Study Area
8 1567
Introduction
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
Robert M i l ler Dr
H arbou r Wy
M a cdon a ld Av
West B arrett Av
Oh io Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
G i a n tH w
Parr B l
B arrett Av
Gertru d e Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av
Richmond H igh School
Peres E l em en tary
B ayvi ew
E l em en tary
Lake E l em en tary Con tra
Costa Col lege
Verd e E l em en tary

RICHMOND

RICHMOND
SAN
PAB LO
N ORTH
RICHMOND 7th
St
Fred J a ckson Wy
H en sley St 6th St
R i chm on d P kwy
R i chm on d P kwy
Ca stro St
&%580
"!80
San Pablo Bay
Atch i son
Vi l l a ge
Belding/
Woods
Fairmede/
H i l l top
H i l l top
D i strict
H i l l top
Vi l l a ge
Iron
Tr i a n gl e
Parch ester
Vi l l a ge
Richmore
Vi l l a ge / M etro Squ are
Sa n ta Fe
Sh ields-Reid
Coronado
Stu dy Corri dor
Stu d y Area
B a y Tra i l
I n du stria l Lan d
U se
Railroad
Richmond
Parkwa y Tra n si t
Cen ter
Schools
.5 M iles

H I L LTOP
M AL L
Wildcat Creek
Figure 3: Map of Study Corridor
Source: Fehr & Peers (2023). 9
1568
1 2
3 1. Community engagement at the North
Richmond Earth Day Festival.

2. Cars traveling along the Parkway at
RIchmond Parkway and San Pablo Ave.

3. Community engagement at the North
Richmond Flea Market.
10 1569
Existing Conditions
CHAPTER 2
Existing Conditions
Signage along the Bay Trail at Richmond Parkway and Gertrude Avenue. 1570

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CORRIDOR COMMUNITIES
Compared to the Contra Costa County
population as a whole, residents living in
the study area tend to have higher rates
of unemployment and lower education
attainment, as seen in Figure 4. The
majority of residents living near the
corridor are Hispanic/Latino, 16% have
limited English proficiency, and nearly
38% are below the federal poverty level
(US Census, ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2019).

Overall, these groups have less access
to opportunities and are at greater
risk of displacement (ESA, 2023; Urban
Displacement Project, 2015). Given that
people living near the study corridor
reflect demographics of historically
underserved populations, most census
tracts within the study area fall within
regionally or federally-defined equity
priority areas, including MTC Equity
Priority Communities, USDOT Historically
Disadvantaged Communities, and USDOT
Areas of Persistent Poverty (Figure 5).

Chapter 3 presents outreach methods
for engaging historically marginalized
populations during the planning process.

Figure 4: Corridor Population Characteristics
63%
38%
6%
29%
64%
35%
4%
22%
69%
38%
3%
41% 44%
21%
3%
11%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
People of Color Low Income / Poverty Unemployed Less than High School Education
Study Corridor City of Richmond North Richmond Contra Costa County 63%
38%
64%
3 69%
44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
People of Color Low Inc
Study Corridor City of R
63%
38%
64%
35%
69%
38%
44%
21%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
People of Color Low Income / Poverty
Study Corridor City of Richmond North
63%
38%
6%
64%
35%
4%
69%
38%
3%
44%
21%
3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
People of Color Low Income / Poverty Unemployed L
Study Corridor City of Richmond North Richmond Contra
63%
38%
6%
29%
64%
35%
4%
22%
69%
38%
3%
41% 44%
21%
3%
11%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
People of Color Low Income / Poverty Unemployed Less than High School Education
Study Corridor City of Richmond North Richmond Contra Costa County Source: U.S. Census
Bureau, ACS 5-Year
(2019).

This chapter introduces how Richmond Parkway is used today and the wide range of existing challenges for all types of users. On average, 25,000 vehicles use the Parkway every day to reach local destinations, including as a connection between I-580 and I-80 and to the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge. Residents living near the corridor are largely Hispanic/Latino with lower incomes and are exposed to the large volumes of traffic, vehicle emissions, pollution, and noise.

Despite the availability of the Bay Trail, many sections can feel uncomfortable for pedestrians and bicyclists, particularly when crossing the Parkway.

Speeding is a major concern and is the most common collision factor. (Unincorporated Area)
12 1571
Existing Conditions
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
Rob ert M i l ler D r
H arbou r Wy
M a cdon a ld Av
West B arrett Av
Oh io Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
Giant
Hw
Parr B l
B arrett Av
Gertru d e Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av

RICHMOND

RICHMOND

SAN PAB LO
N ORTH

RICHMOND
R i chm on d P kwy
R i chm on d P kwy
Ca stro St
&%580
"!80
San Pablo Bay
Atch i son
Vi l l a ge
Belding/
Woods
Fairmede/
H i l l top
H i l l top
D i strict
H i l l top Vi l l a ge
Iron
Tr i a n gl e
Parch ester
Vi l l a ge
Richmore
Vi l l a ge / M etro Squ are
Sa n ta Fe
Sh ields-Reid
Coronado
Stu dy Corri dor
Eq u i ty Priori ty
Comm u n i ties
H i stori ca l ly
D i sa d va n ta ged
Comm u n i ty
Area of
Persi sten t
Poverty
Stu dy Cen su s
Tra cts
.5 M iles

H I L LTOP
M AL L
Figure 5: Map of Equity Priority Areas in Study Area
Source: Fehr & Peers (2023); MTC (2018), USDOT (2021). 13 1572

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

SAFETY FOR ALL ROAD USERS
From 2011 to 2020, there were 322
traffic collisions on the corridor that
resulted in injury, including 46 Killed
and Severe Injury (KSI) collisions. Of
these KSI collisions, 21 resulted in a
severe injury and 25 resulted in a fatality
(Transportation Injury Mapping System
(TIMS), 2011-2020). This is an average of
4-5 KSI collisions per year, and collisions
are increasing—between 2011 and 2017,
there was an average of 3 KSI collisions
per year, however, the average jumped
to 9 between 2018 and 2020 (Figure 6).

There were increases in KSI collisions
involving unsafe speeds, traffic signal
and sign violations, driving under the
influence, and driver violations of the
pedestrian right-of-way. Concentrations
of collisions occur in areas along the
corridor that have higher intersection
density, near railroad crossings, and
at major arterials where there is more
interaction between vehicles and Bay
Trail users. Considering these locations
for redesign can reduce collisions and are
considered in Strategies (Chapter 4).

Collisions on the Parkway
Figure 6: KSI Collisions by Year, 2011-2020
Photo: Students crossing the Richmond Parkway and Lakeside Drive intersection next to Make Waves Academy.

Source: TIMS, 2011 – 2020
2 1
7 2
3 2 2
10 8
9 0
2 4
6 8
10 12
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Annual KSI collisions
KSI Collisions by Year
14 1573
Existing Conditions
Unsafe Speeds
Unsafe speed is the most common primary
collision factor making up 45% of all
injury collisions and 28% of KSI collisions.

The next most common factors in KSI
collisions are failure to obey traffic signals
and signs (15%) and driver violations
of the pedestrian right-of-way (15%).

Although the posted speed limit on the
Parkway is typically 45 miles per hour
(mph), most of the corridor sees off-peak
85th percentile speeds over 50 miles per
hour as shown in Figure 7 (Wejo, 2019).

The maximum observed speeds during
this period rise to nearly 80 mph along
the elevated segment of the Parkway
between North Richmond and Hilltop.

Bicyclists and Pedestrians
KSI collision locations are shown in
Figure 8. Although bicycle and pedestrian
collisions represent only 6% of all injury
collisions, they make up 20% of all KSI
collisions and 24% of fatal collisions,
highlighting the safety disparity for more
vulnerable bicyclists and pedestrians
along the corridor. Studies show that
for vulnerable users, collisions have a
higher likelihood of serious injury or
death, particularly at high speeds.

Photo: Vehicles on Richmond Parkway crossing San
Pablo Avenue.
of collisions on the Parkway are caused
by unsafe speed.
of fatal collisions on the Parkway
involved a bicyclist or a pedestrian
compared to only 6% of all injury
collisions.
45%
24%
Nighttime Collisions
While only 32% of all injury collisions
occurred at night, 52% of all KSI
collisions and 75% of pedestrian KSI
collisions occurred in dark conditions.

Although existing street lights were
reported at most of these KSI collision
locations, reducing unsafe speeds and
improving roadway visibility could
address these types of collisions.
15 1574

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
Rob ert M i l ler Dr
H arbou r Wy
M a cdon a ld Av
West B arrett Av
Oh i o Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
G i a n t H w
Parr B l
B arrett Av
Gertru d e Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av
Richmond
H igh School
Peres
E l em en tary
B ayvi ew
E l em en tary
Lake
E l em en tary Con tra
Costa
Col lege
Verd e
E l em en tary

RICHMOND

RICHMOND
SAN
PAB LO
N ORTH

RICHMOND
R i chm on d P kwy
R i chm on d P kwy
Ca stro St
&%580
"!80
San Pablo Bay
Atch i son
Vi l l a ge
Belding/
Woods
Fairmede/
H i l l top
H i l l top
D i stri ct
H i l l top Vi l l a ge
Iron
Tr i a n gl e
Parch ester
Vi l l a ge
Richmore
Vi l l a ge / M etro Squ are
Sa n ta Fe
Sh ields-Reid
Coronado
Weekd ay N i gh t
Off-P ea k 85th
Percen ti le
Ob served Sp eed
30-40 m ph
40-50 m ph
50-60 mph
60-70 mph
.5 M iles

H I L LTOP
M AL L
Figure 7: Map of 85th Percentile 7PM-6AM Weekday Speeds Source: Wejo (2019). 16
1575
Existing Conditions
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
Rob ert M i l ler D r
H arbou r Wy
M a cdon a ld Av
West B arrett Av
Oh io Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
Giant
Hw
Parr B l
B arrett Av
Gertru d e Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av
Richmond H igh School
Peres E l em en tary
B ayvi ew
E l em en tary
Lake E l em en tary Con tra
Costa Col lege
Verd e E l em en tary

RICHMOND

RICHMOND

SAN PAB LO
N ORTH

RICHMOND
Ca stro St
Richmond Pkwy
&%580
"!80
San Pablo Bay
.5 M iles

H I L LTOP
M AL L
Schools
Railroad
B a y Tra i l
Stu dy Corri dor
Severe I n ju ry
Coll ision
Fa ta l Co l l i si on
Co l l i sion Typ e
a n d Sever i ty
Coll ision
I n vo lvi n g
a B i cycl i st or
Pedestrian
Figure 8: Map of KSI Collisions
Source: TIMS (2011 – 2020). 17
1576

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The Contra Costa
Transportation Authority
(CCTA) Contra Costa
Countywide Transportation
Safety Policy and
Implementation Guide
(2021), Contra Costa
County Vision Zero (2022),
and City of Richmond
Local Roadway Safety Plan
(2022) have all identified
Richmond Parkway as
a corridor on the HighInjury Network (HIN).

This means that Richmond
Parkway sees higher
concentrations of KSI
collisions as compared to
other areas of Richmond
and Contra Costa County.

However, Castro Street
is not included on the
HIN. Figure 9 maps the
HIN of each agency.
%

 !" #%$$$
%

%

%


%
%

%


  

  










   
Previous Safety
Studies
18 1577
Existing Conditions
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
Rob ert M i l ler D r
H arbou r Wy
M a cdon a ld Av
West B arrett Av
Oh io Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
Giant
Hw
Parr B l
B arrett Av
Gertru d e Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av
Richmond H igh School
Peres E l em en tary
B ayvi ew
E l em en tary
Lake E l em en tary Con tra
Costa Col lege
Verd e E l em en tary

RICHMOND

RICHMOND

SAN PAB LO
N ORTH

RICHMOND
R i chm on d P kwy
R i chm on d P kwy
Ca stro St
&%580
"!80
San Pablo Bay
CCTA Al l M od es
HIN
Con tra Costa
Cou n ty Al l
M odes H I N
R i ch m on d Al l
M odes H I N
Stu dy Corri dor
C i ty of R i ch m on d
Schools
Railroad
.5 M iles

H I L LTOP
M AL L
Figure 9: Map of High Injury Networks
Source: Contra Costa Transportation Authority (2021); Contra Costa County (2022); City of Richmond (2022). 26th St Rheem Ave
Lincoln Ave
19 1578

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

BIKING AND WALKING
The Bay Trail is a critical regional path that
generally traverses the Parkway’s west
side from the southern end to Goodrick
Avenue in North Richmond. The Bay Trail
is on the east side of the corridor between
Hensley Street and Gertrude Avenue, and
the City of Richmond has proposed to
realign this section to the west side for
better connectivity. While the existing
Bay Trail connects users to destinations
like Point Pinole, Point Richmond, and
beyond, there are few crossing locations
from the east side and they lack basic
safety enhancements. Many parts of the
Bay Trail along the study corridor are in
need of repair, with cracked and uneven
pavement and overgrown landscaping.

Regular maintenance to remove trash,
debris, and vegetative overgrowth to
maintain the trail and improve user
experience is needed. The Bay Trail also
has limited lighting, wayfinding signage,
and shade, and a narrow or nonexistent
buffer from fast-moving traffic on the
Parkway. Sections in North Richmond,
particularly near the Wildcat Creek
trail crossing, also regularly flood.

The Bay Trail
Poor pavement
quality
Limited shade in hot
conditions
Small buffer between sidewalk and fast traffic Missing sidewalks near more active land uses Lack of trail lighting
Trail gaps force people onto high-stress routes
like Hensley Street
Inconsistent buffer between bike trail and
roadway
No signage indicating
shared-use path
Biking and Walking Experience along the Parkway
Poor pavement quality, gaps, proximity to fast-moving traffic, long infrequent pedestrian crossings, and lack of shade, lighting, signage, and vegetation buffers, make Richmond Parkway unwelcoming to walk or bike on today. There is a range of opportunities to improve the comfort of people using the Bay Trail, bikeways, sidewalks, and crossings. 20 1579
Existing Conditions
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Richmond
High School
Peres
Elementary
Bayview
Elementary
Lake
Elementary Contra
Costa
College
Verde
Elementary
San Pablo Av
Fitzgerald Dr
Rumrill Bl
West Macdonald Av
Robert Miller Dr
Harbour Wy
Macdonald Av
West Barrett Av
Ohio Av
22nd St
13th St
Pennsylvania Av
Carlson Bl
Giant Rd
23rd St
Hilltop Dr
McBryde Av
San Pablo Dam Rd
Giant Hw
Parr Bl
Rd 20
Rd 20
Barrett Av
Gertrude Av
San Pablo Av
vAk icr dooG
Pittsburg Av
6th St
Fred Jackson Wy
Market Av
11th St
Broadway Av
Atlas Rd
Blume Dr
Hilltop Mall Rd
Shane Dr
Garvin Av
Lincoln Av
Lakeside Dr

RICHMOND

RICHMOND

SAN PABLO
NORTH

RICHMOND
Richmond Pkwy
Richmond Pkwy
Castro St
&%580
"!80
"!80
Hensley St
San Pablo Bay

HILLTOP
MALL
Study Corridor
Railroad
Railyard
Schools
Existing/Proposed
Bicycle Facilities
Shared-Use Path
Separated Bike Lane
Bicycle Lane
Bicycle Route or
Boulevard
Bay Trail
.5 Miles
Figure 10: Map of Existing and Proposed Bikeways
Source: Fehr & Peers (2023); Richmond BPAP (2023); Contra Costa County ATP (2022); CCTA Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2018)
21 1580

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
3 miles of new bikeways needed
of intersections along the Parkway are
67%
missing pedestrian countdown signals
Bent crosswalks
Corner sight distance issues ADA non-compliant ramps
Outdated push buttons
Faded markings High vehicle turn speeds
the corridor, there are 2.6 miles of
sidewalk gaps on the west side of the
corridor and 3.4 miles on the east side.

Safety at Intersections
Most intersections are large in size with
curb radii that enable turns at high
speeds and make for long pedestrian
and bicycle crossing distances.

About 70% of the signalized intersections
do not have bicycle detection and 65%
are missing pedestrian countdown timers,
leaving pedestrians unsure of how much
time is left to safely cross the street.

Both bicycle detection and pedestrian
countdown timers are state requirements
per the California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

These gaps in pedestrian and bikeway
infrastructure along the corridor are
critical to address given safety and
speeding concerns along the corridor.

Closing the Gaps
There are also several gaps in the
bikeway and walkway infrastructure on
the corridor. Figure 10 (previous page)
identifies the existing and proposed
bikeways. There are currently about
three miles of bikeway gaps along the
Parkway where there are no plans for
the Bay Trail and no bicycle facilities
exist. Though there are no active
fronting land uses consistently across
Example Safety Improvement Needs
Bent crosswalks
Outdated push buttons
22 1581
Existing Conditions

DRIVING AND GOODS MOVEMENT
Richmond Parkway is a major road linking
I-80 and I-580 and serves industrial truck
traffic, regional commuters, and local
trips. The Parkway carries between 19,000
and 37,000 vehicles every weekday,
with 7% being truck traffic along the
corridor. The share of truck traffic is
consistent with larger arterials in the
area, including San Pablo Avenue. The
heaviest vehicle volumes are seen east
of Lakeside Drive. Many of these trips
serve regional destinations along the
corridor, such as the Contra Costa Landfill,
UPS and Amazon distribution centers,
Whole Foods Market Food Distribution
Center, and the Chevron Refinery. The
corridor experiences slowdowns during
the commute periods, particularly in the
northbound direction in the evening.

Speeds and Signals
Along most of the corridor, signals are
not coordinated. This negatively impacts
air quality and vehicle flow may not be
optimized. Slowdowns are worst in the
northbound direction in the afternoon
with average speeds around 30 mph as
shown in Figure 11 (Wejo, 2019). The
slowest segment is north of the Castro
Street and Richmond Parkway merge
where speeds are less than 25 mph for
nearly a mile. To keep traffic moving,
green times along the Parkway can be
30 seconds longer compared to other
signals in Richmond, which results in more
delay for all users entering or crossing
the Parkway. Travel times are expected to
double in the future, given planned and
anticipated growth along the corridor. On
average, traffic volumes are expected to
grow about 50%-60% by 2040.

Photo: Congestion causing queue spillover at San
Pablo Avenue and and Richmond Parkway.

Up to
vehicles take the Parkway on weekdays.
of vehicles are trucks.
37,000
7%
23 1582

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Figure 11: Map of Slowdowns During 7-9AM and 4-6PM Peak Periods Source: Wejo (2019).

PM Peak Period
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
Rob ert M i l ler D r
M a cdon a ld Av
22n d St
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
Giant
Hw
B arrett Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Richmond
H igh School
B ayvi ew
E l em en tary
Lake
em en tary Con tra
Costa
Col lege
PINOLE

RICHMOND
SAN
PAB LO
R i chm on d P kwy
"!80
Avera ge Sp eed s
≤25 mph
26-35 mph
36-45 m ph
>45 m ph

H I L LTOP
M AL L
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
Rob ert M i l ler D r
H arbou r Wy
M a cdon a ld Av
West B arrett Av
Oh io Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
Giant Hw
Parr B l
B arrett Av
Gertru d e Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av
Richmond
H igh School
Peres
E l em en tary
B ayvi ew
E l em en tary
Lake
E l em en tary Con tra
Costa
Col lege
Verd e
E l em en tary
PINOLE

RICHMOND

RICHMOND
SAN
PAB LO
N ORTH

RICHMOND
R i chm on d P kwy
R i chm on d P kwy
Ca stro St
&%580
"!80
San Pablo Bay
Avera ge Sp eed s
≤25 mph
26-35 mph
36-45 m ph
>45 m ph
.5 M iles

H I L LTOP
M AL L
AM Peak Period
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
Rob ert M i l ler D r
H arbou r Wy
M a cdon a ld Av
West B arrett Av
Oh io Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
Giant
Hw
Parr B l
B arrett Av
Gertru d e Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av
Richmond
H igh School
Peres
E l em en tary
B ayvi ew
E l em en tary
Lake
E l em en tary Con tra
Costa
Col lege
Verd e
E l em en tary
PINOLE

RICHMOND

RICHMOND
SAN
PAB LO
N ORTH

RICHMOND
R i chm on d P kwy
R i chm on d P kwy
Ca stro St
&%580
"!80
San Pablo Bay
.5 M iles

H I L LTOP
M AL L
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
H arbou r Wy
M a c
West B arrett Av
Oh io Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
Giant Hw
Parr B l
Gertru d e Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av
Richmond
H igh Schoo
Peres
E l em en tary
B ayvi ew
E l em en tary
Lake
E l em en tary
Verd e
E l em en tary
PI

RICHMOND
N ORTH

RICHMOND
R i ch
R i chm on d P kwy
Ca stro St
&%580
San Pablo Bay
.5 M iles
North Segment
Central/South Segment
AM Peak Period
PM Peak Period
PM Peak Period
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
Rob ert M i l ler D r
H arbou r Wy
M a cdon a ld Av
West B arrett Av
Oh io Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
Giant Hw
Parr B l
B arrett Av
Gertru d e Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av
Richmond
H igh School
Peres
E l em en tary
B ayvi ew
E l em en tary
Lake
E l em en tary Con tra
Costa
Col lege
Verd e
E l em en tary
PINOLE

RICHMOND

RICHMOND
SAN
PAB LO
N ORTH

RICHMOND
R i chm on d P kwy
R i chm on d P kwy
Ca stro St
&%580
"!80
San Pablo Bay
Avera ge Sp eed s
≤25 mph
26-35 mph
36-45 m ph
>45 m ph
.5 M iles

H I L LTOP
M AL L
24 1583
Existing Conditions
Photo: Truck turning close to the sidewalk
at Atlas Road and Richmond Parkway.

Travel Patterns
Drivers typically use the Parkway for trips
that start or end in the study area rather
than as a freeway-to-freeway connector.

In the afternoon peak period, less than a
third of northbound car drivers travel from
the I-580 interchange and get onto I-80
(Streetlight, 2022). This pattern is similar
for daily truck trips.

Over 60% of trucks getting onto the
Parkway from I-80 or I-580 travel to
destinations along the corridor. These
destinations are often sources of regional
economic activity and services, and
include the aforementioned distribution
centers, landfill and recycling yards,
Over
of northbound trucks turn off the
Parkway into North Richmond, most of
which use Hensley Street.
50%
hazardous waste disposal plants, water
reclaim plants, and more. For northbound
trucks that stop along the corridor,
the most popular destinations are in
North Richmond via Parr Boulevard,
Pittsburg Avenue, and Hensley Street,
as shown in Figure 12. Southbound
truck trips are more dispersed, with
21% continuing on to the Port of
Richmond as shown in Figure 13.
25 1584

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
San Pablo Av
Fitzgerald Dr
Rumrill Bl
West Macdonald Av
Robert Miller Dr
Harbour Wy
Macdonald Av
West Barrett Av
Ohio Av
22nd St
13th St
Pennsylvania Av
Carlson Bl
Giant Rd
23rd St
Hilltop Dr
McBryde Av
San Pablo Dam Rd
Parr Bl
Rd 20
Rd 20
Barrett Av
Gertrude Av
San Pablo Av
vAk icr dooG
Pittsburg Av
7th St
6th St
Market Av
Broadway Av
Atlas Rd
Blume Dr
Hilltop Mall Rd
Shane Dr
Garvin Av
Lincoln Av
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
.5 Miles
33%
6%
2%
10%
9%
5%
2% 29%
Screenline
Departures/
Destinations
Industrial
Land Use
Truck Route

RICHMOND

RICHMOND

SAN PABLO
NORTH

RICHMOND
Atchison
Village
Belding/
Woods
Fairmede/
Hilltop
Hilltop
District
Hilltop Village
Iron
Triangle
Parchester
Village
Richmore
Village/ Metro Square
Santa Fe
Shields-Reid
Coronado
Richmond Pkwy
Richmond Pkwy
Castro St
&%580
"!80
"!80
San Pablo Bay

HILLTOP
MALL
Hensley St
Figure 12: Map of Northbound Daily Truck Distribution
26 Source: Streetlight (2022).
1585
Existing Conditions
San Pablo Av
Fitzgerald Dr
Rumrill Bl
West Macdonald Av
Robert Miller Dr
Harbour Wy
Macdonald Av
West Barrett Av
Ohio Av
22nd St
13th St
Pennsylvania Av
Carlson Bl
Giant Rd
23rd St
Hilltop Dr
McBryde Av
San Pablo Dam Rd
Giant Hw
Parr Bl
Rd 20
Rd 20
Barrett Av
Gertrude Av
San Pablo Av
vAk icr dooG
Pittsburg Av
7th St
6th St
Fred Jackson Wy
Market Av
11th St
Broadway Av
Atlas Rd
Blume Dr
Hilltop Mall Rd
Shane Dr
Garvin Av
Lincoln Av
Lakeside Dr
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
.5 Miles
2%
Atchison
Village
Belding/
Woods
Fairmede/
Hilltop
Hilltop
District
Hilltop Village
Iron
Triangle
Parchester
Village
Richmore
Village/ Metro Square
Santa Fe
Shields-Reid
Coronado
8% 5%
6%
35%
23% 3%
5%
2%
2%
7%
<1% I-580
8% WB I-580
5% EB I-580
21% Port
Screenline
Departures/
Destinations
Industrial
Land Use
Truck Route

RICHMOND

RICHMOND

SAN PABLO
NORTH

RICHMOND
Richmond Pkwy
Richmond Pkwy
Castro St
&%580
"!80
"!80
Hensley St
San Pablo Bay

HILLTOP
MALL
Figure 13: Map of Southbound Daily Truck Distribution
Source: Streetlight (2022). 27
1586

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Photo: Busy I-580 onramp at Castro St.

PUBLIC HEALTH
Climate
Increasing concentrations of greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions are the primary
cause of global warming. This change in
the earth’s climate systems will increase
the severity, frequency, and duration of
climate hazards, including extreme heat,
wildfire, drought, and sea level rise.

Vulnerable populations and
neighborhoods subject to GHG emissions
will be disproportionately affected by
climate change, including people of
color, children, seniors, individuals
with disabilities, households without
access to a vehicle (Contra Costa
County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan,
2018; Fehr and Peers, 2023; ESA,
2023). The burden of pollution can be
visualized through the CalEnviroScreen
tool, as shown in Figure 14. Some census tracts adjacent to Richmond Parkway have diesel
particulate matter concentrations
higher than
of all census tracts in California
78%
Local and regional sources of pollution,
noise, and increasing threat from
climate change hazards affect public
health and environmental quality for
communities along the corridor.

Pollution
Diesel particulate matter (diesel PM),
is a carcinogenic air contaminant
produced by the exhaust of trucks,
trains, ships, and equipment with
diesel engines. Given the industrial and
goods movement uses along Richmond
Parkway, diesel PM concentrations near
the corridor range from 0.08 to 0.98 tons
per year. This is greater than 78% of
communities statewide (California Office
of Health Hazard Assessment, 2021).
28 1587
Existing Conditions
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
Rob ert M i l ler D r
H arbou r Wy
M a cdon a ld Av
West B arrett Av
Oh io Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
Giant
Hw
Parr B l
B arrett Av
Gertru d e Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av

RICHMOND

RICHMOND

SAN PAB LO
N ORTH

RICHMOND
R i chm on d P kwy
R i chm on d P kwy
Ca stro St
&%580
"!80
San Pablo Bay
Atch i son
Vi l l a ge
Belding/
Woods
Fairmede/
H i l l top
H i l l top
D i strict
H i l l top Vi l l a ge
Iron
Tr i a n gl e
Parch ester
Vi l l a ge
Richmore
Vi l l a ge / M etro Squ are
Sa n ta Fe
Sh ields-Reid
Coronado
Stu dy Corri dor
Eq u i ty Priori ty
Comm u n i ties
( P B A 2050)
Stu d y Area Po l l u ti on
Burden Percen ti les
(Ca lE n viroScreen 4. 0)
≤ 25%
26%-50%
51%-75%
≥75%
.5 M iles

H I L LTOP
M AL L
Figure 14: Map of Pollution Burden in Study Area
Source: California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (2021). 29 1588

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Photo: Vehicles turning onto the
freeway on-ramp at Canal St.

Health Impacts
Poor environmental conditions
contribute to public health issues,
including asthma, cardiovascular
disease, cancer, and low birth weight.

The highest rates of asthma attacks
based on Emergency Room admissions
near the corridor are in North Richmond
and the Iron Triangle neighborhood.

The asthma rate in Iron Triangle is
greater than 99% of other census tracts
statewide, and North Richmond’s
rate is greater than 98% of other census
tracts statewide as shown in Figure
15 (California Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment, 2021).

Iron Triangle has an asthma rate higher
than
of all census tracts in California
99%
30 1589
Existing Conditions
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Sa n Pab lo Av
F i tzgera ld Dr
Ru m r i l l B l
West M a cdon a ld Av
Rob ert M i l ler D r
H arbou r Wy
M a cdon a ld Av
West B arrett Av
Oh io Av
22n d St
1 3th St
Pen n sylva n i a Av
Carl son B l
G i a n t Rd
23rd St
H i l l top Dr
M cBryd e Av
Sa n Pab lo D am Rd
Giant
Hw
Parr B l
B arrett Av
Gertru d e Av
Sa n Pab lo Av
Goodr i ck Av
P i ttsb u rg Av

RICHMOND

RICHMOND

SAN PAB LO
N ORTH

RICHMOND
R i chm on d P kwy
R i chm on d P kwy
Ca stro St
&%580
"!80
San Pablo Bay
Atch i son
Vi l l a ge
Belding/
Woods
Fairmede/
H i l l top
H i l l top
D i strict
H i l l top Vi l l a ge
Iron
Tr i a n gl e
Parch ester
Vi l l a ge
Richmore
Vi l l a ge / M etro Squ are
Sa n ta Fe
Sh ields-Reid
Coronado
Stu dy Corri dor
Eq u i ty Priori ty
Comm u n i ties
( P B A 2050)
Stu d y Area Asth m a
Percen ti les
(Ca lE n viroScreen 4. 0)
≤85%
86%-90%
91%-95%
≥95%
.5 M iles

H I L LTOP
M AL L
Figure 15: Map of Asthma Rate in Study Area
Source: California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (2021). 31 1590

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

TRANSIT SERVICE
Limited transit service operates on the
corridor. Although there are 11 local
and regional routes, they only travel on
the northern and southern sections of
the Parkway, including at the Richmond
Parkway Transit Center (RPTC), but
none run along the full length of the
corridor. These routes and community
destinations like schools, hospitals, and
supermarkets are shown in Figure 16.

Many transit routes that serve corridor
residents run through residential
neighborhoods and to community
destinations instead of directly on the
Parkway, which has fewer active uses.

Photo: Bus stop at W MacDonald Ave.

Bus Connections
About 28% of total morning peak period
trips starting in the study area use the
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge in the
westbound direction. While there are
several bus routes that take riders north
and south of Richmond, there is only
one route that takes riders across the
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge: the Golden
Gate Transit 580 Route that stops at
Tewksbury Avenue and Castro Street.

Today, there are limited connections
between the study area and this bus stop
via the 607 and 72M. The 607 is a school
route with only one run on weekdays,
and the 72M only connects residents
living in the southern portion of the
corridor. Many lines run about every 30
minutes, providing limited service to
hospitals, supermarkets, and connections
like the Richmond BART station.

Photo: Buses waiting at the
Richmond Parkway Transit Center.
of households near Richmond Parkway
do not own a car, compared to 5%
across Contra Costa County.
9%
32 1591
Existing Conditions
Richmond
High School
Peres
Elementary
Bayview
Elementary
Lake
Elementary
Contra
Costa
College
Verde
Elementary
San Pablo Av
Fitzgerald Dr
Rumrill Bl
West Macdonald Av
Robert Miller Dr
Harbour Wy
Macdonald Av
West Barrett Av
Ohio Av
22nd St
13th St
Pennsylvania Av
Carlson Bl
Giant Rd
23rd St
Hilltop Dr
McBryde Av
San Pablo Dam Rd
Giant Hw
Parr Bl
Barrett Av
Gertrude Av
San Pablo Av
vAk icr dooG
Pittsburg Av
Wildcat
Canyon RP
Point
Pinole Reg.

Shoreline
Study Corridor
Richmond
Parkway Transit
Center
WestCAT Routes
Golden Gate
Transit Routes
AC Transit
Local and
Transbay Routes
AC Transit
School and
Night Routes
Hospitals
Supermarkets

HILLTOP
MALL
.5 Miles
16 JPX
J
76 70
71 Routes Stopping LA 376
at the Richmond
Parkway Transit
Center
Figure 16: Map of Transit Routes in Study Area
Source: AC Transit (2023); WestCAT (2023); Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District (2023). 33 1592
Richmond Parkway Transit Center
The RPTC includes a park-and-ride lot and serves five AC Transit and three WestCat bus routes that connect West County communities to Richmond, Hercules, San Pablo, El Cerrito, and Downtown San Francisco. However, the layout of the Transit Center requires several minutes of diversion time, which adds up to over 13,000 annual rider hours for WestCAT express routes. There is also limited bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure connecting to the transit center as shown in Figure 17.

Figure 17: Map of Richmond Parkway Transit Center Existing Conditions Source: Richmond Parkway Transit Center Existing Conditions Review (AC Transit, 2011); Fehr & Peers (2023).

Parking for
206 vehicles
Loading zone for
pick-up/drop-off
Genentech Bus
Loading Area
Pedestrian
access points
Informal
pedestrian
access point
Center island
platform
with shelters
and benches
Existing Bike Route with sharrows
Missing
sidewalk
Low-visibility
crosswalks
Existing Bike
Lanes
Low-visibility
crosswalks
Low-visibility
crosswalks

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
34 1593
Engagement
CHAPTER 3
Engagement
Community engagement at the North Richmond Flea Market. 1594

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

STAKEHOLDER GROUPS
WCCTC engaged a variety of stakeholder groups, ranging from project partners who will help deliver the Plan’s recommendations to members of the public. Key stakeholder groups were:

General Public
Residents and users of the Parkway were
reached through in-person and online
activities. To ensure engagement from
marginalized residents living within
the study area, in-person methods
focused on presenting at community
meetings and tabling at events/pop-ups
in adjacent neighborhoods, including
North Richmond, Parchester Village,
and Iron Triangle. To get the word
out, all opportunities were advertised
through social media ads and flyers and
engagement information was distributed
to all members of the WCCTC Board,
PAG, and Technical Advisory Committee.

Because over 48% of people living in the
area speak Spanish at home, Spanishspeaking staff attended each pop-up event and interactive boards, flyers,
and social media ads were translated
into Spanish. Online engagement was
conducted through an online platform that
enabled translation into any language.

Public Advisory Group (PAG)
The PAG served as community liaisons
to review and confirm the Public
Engagement Plan, share information with
community members, and provide input
on the strategies. The Public Advisory
Group consisted of representatives
from the Port of Richmond, Richmond
A robust community engagement process provided critical input to the Plan’s needs and recommendations. This chapter summarizes the stakeholder groups, engagement methods, and feedback received. Appendix A contains the engagement approach and feedback summary. 36 1595
Engagement
Photo: Community engagement at Thrive Thursdays event in Richmond Neighborhood Coordinating
Council, Trails for Richmond Action
Committee, Urban Tilth, Watershed
Project, Groundwork Richmond, Bike
East Bay, North Richmond Municipal
Advisory Council, Community
Housing Development Corporation,
Bay Area Outreach and Recreation
Program, and the California Trucking
Association. Four PAG meetings were
convened through the process.

WCCTC Board
The Board was continually updated
throughout the project and provided
strategic direction on the Plan.

Board members consisted of elected
officials representing the cities
of Hercules, Pinole, Richmond,
San Pablo, and El Cerrito, as well
as AC Transit, BART, WestCAT,
and Contra Costa County.

Project Partners
WCCTC partnered with the City
of Richmond and Contra Costa
County to deliver this Plan. Project
partners participated in project
management team meetings on a
bi-weekly basis and were involved in
key decisions throughout the study.

Their feedback is foundational to
this Plan, as agencies that operate
the local right-of-way will ultimately
deliver many of the strategies and
recommendations included in this Plan.

Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
The Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) facilitated coordination among
various agencies and organizations,
allowing key stakeholders to provide
input and technical guidance.

The TAC included representatives
from the cities of Hercules, Pinole,
Richmond, and San Pablo, as well
as AC Transit, BART, WestCAT, Contra
Costa County, the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission, the East
Bay Regional Parks District, and the
West County Wastewater District.
37 1596

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY
The public engagement plan was developed with input from the PAG. After the first engagement phase was completed, the PAG confirmed the rest of the engagement plan was on-track.

Engagement efforts resulted in...

1. Understand Needs
The first engagement phase focused on identifying needs and vision for the Parkway and confirming understanding of existing challenges and experiences using the Richmond Parkway.

Pop-Up Engagement
• August 6, 2023: North
Richmond Flea Market
(North Richmond)
• August 10, 2023: Thrive
Thursdays (Coronado)
• August 19, 2023: Walmart
(Hilltop)
Community Meetings
• September 5, 2023: North
Richmond Municipal
Advisory Council
• September 12, 2023:

Parchester Village
Neighborhood Council
• September 20,
2023: Iron Triangle
Neighborhood Council
Online Webmap
• June 15 through
September 4, 2023
PAG Meetings
• June 8, 2023
• September 21, 2023
WCCTC Board
Meetings
• May 26, 2023
• September 29, 2023
5 POP-UPS COMMUNITY 7 MEETINGS
PAG 4 MEETINGS
WCCTC
BOARD

MEETINGS
4 WITH 142
PEOPLE

PROVIDING

FEEDBACK
WITH 253
FROM 211

RESPONSES

CONTRIBUTORS
ONLINE

ENGAGEMENT
TOOLS
3 TAC 5 MEETINGS
38 1597
Engagement

2. Explore Strategies

3. Refine Solutions
Then, stakeholders provided input on draft strategies
responding to identified needs and issues. Community
priorities for solutions were identified.

Comments on the priority strategies and Draft Plan were collected. The Final Plan is announced to the public.

Pop-Up Engagement
• March 24, 2024: North Richmond Flea Market
• April 20, 2024: North Richmond’s Earth Day Festival
Community Meetings
• March 12, 2024: Parchester Village Neighborhood Council • April 2, 2024: North Richmond
Municipal Advisory Council
• April 6, 2024: City of Richmond District 2
• April 17, 2024: Iron Triangle Neighborhood Council
Public Draft Online Survey
• November 2024
PAG Meeting
• October 9, 2024
WCCTC Board Meeting
• October 25, 2024
Richmond Council Meeting
• November 19, 2024
Contra Costa County Board of
Supervisors Transportation, Water,
and Infrastructure Subcommittee
• December 9, 2024
CCTA Board Meeting
• January 15, 2025
Online Survey
• March 11 through
April 29, 2024
PAG Meeting
• February 22, 2024
WCCTC Board
Meeting
• March 22, 2024
39 1598

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
PHASE 1: UNDERSTAND NEEDS
To kick off the Plan, WCCTC asked participants to share their challenges and experiences using the Richmond Parkway via an online webmap of the corridor and by providing input in-person. Participants provided feedback on experiences related to safety, public health, transit, biking and walking, and vehicles and goods movement.

Photo of Phase 1 pop-up at North Richmond Flea Market, 2024, and images of Phase 1 online webmap and social media ads.
40 1599
Engagement
What We Heard
Respondents cited safety as their top
concern, particularly related to speeding
along the Parkway. Nearly a third of all
responses related to biking and walking,
a majority of which noted comfort and
safety challenges while using the Parkway
and the Bay Trail. Biking and walking
comments also indicated concerns
about existing infrastructure, such as
missing sidewalks and curb ramps and
poor accessibility to trails. Participants
also brought up peak period congestion
Note: Percentages add up to more than 100% due to the open-ended nature of comments received.

More than one topic could be discussed in each comment. throughout the corridor, with specific
issues at intersections like San Pablo
Avenue, Giant Road, and Castro Street.

Maintenance was an important theme,
specifically concerning deteriorating
pavement, illegal dumping, and overgrown
trees. The distribution of need-related
topics heard can be seen in Figure 18.

Feedback on needs and desired
improvements was used as a
basis for the development of draft
strategies presented in Chapter 4.
“It’s a deadly rat race road
that I prefer not to drive on
anymore.”
“Making the Parkway look like it’s being
cared for will go a long way towards
making people feel safe.”
“The stretch where Parkway opens up from 2
lanes to 4 is crazy! It turns into a speedway!”
“Walking across the
Parkway is super scary.”
40%
30%
32% 30%
14% 12%
20%
0%
10%
Distribution of Phase 1 Comments by Topic
Safety Biking & Walking Congestion Maintenance
Figure 18: Distribution of Need-Related Topics Heard
41 1600

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
PHASE 2: EXPLORE STRATEGIES
A list of over 30 strategies, organized into six different overarching topics, was developed to address the needs previously identified through existing conditions analysis, existing plans and policies, and engagement.

Stakeholders reviewed each strategy and provided a sense of relative priority.

In this phase of engagement, participants were asked to provide feedback on the draft strategies. Participants ranked strategies via an online survey, in-person verbally, or in-person on interactive boards.

Participants could also provide open-ended feedback on the draft strategies or suggest strategies that they felt were missing. Since the Parkway is also a regional facility serving a broader community whose preferred solutions may look different from residents living along the corridor, it was important to supplement the results of digital engagement strategy with in-person feedback from nearby residents.

Public Health
Strategies that reduce
neighborhood truck traffic
and reduce or mitigate
vehicle emissions.

Safety
Strategies that reduce
speeding and expand
emergency vehicle access.

Walking and Biking
Strategies that improve
walking and biking experience
on the Richmond Parkway
and the Bay Trail.

Driving and Goods Movement
Strategies that address congestion
and improve wayfinding.

Maintenance
Strategies that address
corridor and trail maintenance
and illegal dumping.

Transit
Strategies that address
transit reliability, service,
comfort, and access.

Strategy Categories
42 1601
Engagement
Images of Phase 2 Online Survey.

Photo of Phase 2 pop-up
at North Richmond Earth
Day Festival, 2024.

Photo of Phase 2 pop-up at North
Richmond Flea Market, 2024.
43 1602

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
What We Heard
Figure 19 summarizes the pop-up and
online survey results, and highlights
the top strategy categories identified.

The top four draft strategy categories
were public health, safety, maintenance,
and walking and biking. Top strategies
were ranked within each category
based on the level of support.

The top strategy categories differed
between online survey respondents
and pop-up participants. Pop-up
participants more strongly represented
Equity Priority Communities living
along the corridor compared to online
survey respondents, who represented
the broader community of regional
Parkway users. Almost half of pop-up
interactions occurred in Spanish. Pop-up
participants ranked public health as the
top strategy, followed by maintenance and
safety, while online respondents ranked
walking and biking as their top strategy,
followed by safety and maintenance.

Public health strategies that received
the most support were strategies
restricting trucks from driving through
neighborhoods and parking or idling
near sensitive land uses, as well as the
strategy to mitigate emissions through
urban greening. Safety strategies,
particularly measures to reduce speeding
and address high risk intersections,
were desired. Under maintenance,
strategies addressing ongoing roadway
maintenance and illegal dumping
received support from all audiences.

Popular strategies related to walking
and biking included upgrading on-street
bikeways and sidewalks and constructing
a new crossing for Wildcat Creek Trail.

Photo of Phase 2 pop-up at North
Richmond Flea Market, 2024.
44 1603
Engagement
221917161412272315131111
Feedback received during this phase
confirmed the responsiveness
of draft strategies to community
needs and identified the top
strategies for implementation.

Strategies in the highest-ranking
categories were given greater
consideration during the identification of
Priority Strategies described in Chapter 5.

Figure 19: Distribution of Draft Strategy Category Votes Pop-Up Votes
by Category
Online Survey Votes
by Category1

1. Survey respondents skew more white
and more wealthy than residents living
along the Parkway.

Public Health, Maintenance, Safety, and Walking &
Biking were the most popular strategy categories.
12%
(29)
Public Health
Maintenance
Safety
Walking and Biking
Transit
Driving and Goods
Movement
22%
(51)
19%
(45)
17%
(40)
16%
(37)
14%
(33)
27%
(90)
23%
(78) 15%
(52)
13%
(45)
11%
(38)
11%
(36)
45 1604
PHASE 3: REFINE SOLUTIONS
TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING PHASE 3

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
46 1605
Strategies
CHAPTER 4
Strategies
Photo of Phase 2 pop-up at North
Richmond Flea Market, 2024.
1606

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

IDENTIFYING STRATEGIES
The Plan identifies 29 strategies that
address the Plan’s six goals, needs
identified through existing conditions
analysis (Chapter 2), and community
A major outcome of this Plan is a recommended list of strategies that represent projects, policies, or programs related to transportation or transportation impacts along the corridor for WCCTC and project partners to advance.

Public Health
Strategies that reduce truck
cut-through traffic and reduce
or capture vehicle emissions.

Safety
Strategies that reduce vehicle
speeds, address intersection
conflict points, and prioritize
emergency vehicle access.

Walking and Biking
Strategies that support
comfortable walking and
biking on the Parkway and the
Bay Trail.

Driving and Goods
Movement
Strategies that encourage
carpooling, optimize
signal timing, and improve
wayfinding for drivers.

Maintenance
Strategies that holistically
address corridor and Bay
Trail maintenance and reduce
illegal dumping.

Transit
Strategies that improve
access and circulation at the
Richmond Parkway Transit
Center and support and
encourage transit ridership.
engagement feedback (Chapter 3).

The strategies are organized into six
categories described in Figure 20 below.

Figure 20: Strategy Categories
48 1607
Strategies
Meets Some Goals
Meets Most Goals
Meets Many Goals All strategies meet at
least some of the Plan’s
goals, and 63% meet
many or most goals.

Table 1: Qualitative Goal Alignment Metrics
Figure 21: Goals Alignment Ranking
Goal Metric
Improve Safety for All Users* 1a Reduce severe and fatal injury collisions Increase Access to Key
Destinations*
2a Increase quality of connections
2b Expand connectivity to key destinations
Improve Health* 3a Decrease emissions
3b Reduce cut-through traffic
Advance Placemaking* 4a Improve maintenance and street beautification 4b Address key topics heard during engagement
Enhance Travel Time
Reliability and Efficiency
5a Reduce vehicle delay
5b Increase vehicle occupancy
Support Feasible Strategies 6a Advance already adopted strategies 6b Near- to Medium-term implementation
*Goal weighted more heavily given disproportionate benefit to local Equity Priority Communities.

Implementing these strategies will require
coordination between WCCTC and partner
agencies and organizations. The top 10 are
identified as Priority Strategies (Chapter
5) to be advanced first. WCCTC and partner
agencies may draw from the larger list of
strategies as conditions change or as new
funding or capacity opportunities arise.

To measure the Plan’s performance, each
strategy was evaluated against the Plan’s
goals, as shown in Table 1. Consideration
of equity was incorporated by more
heavily weighting goals that would have a
disproportionate benefit to Equity Priority
Communities living along the corridor.

Based on the goal alignment metrics,
each strategy met Some Goals, Many
Goals, or Most Goals, as pictured in
Figure 21. The full list of almost 30
strategies is presented in Table 2.
49 1608
RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN Strategies
ID Topic Subtopic Strategy Name Goals Alignment Description PH-1* Public Health Trucks Implement new truck routes
Update designated truck routes in North Richmond, which is surrounded by industrial use, to ensure connections between truck-generating uses and the Parkway avoid residential neighborhoods to the extent feasible. Install cameras for automated monitoring and enforcement of heavy vehicles exceeding weight limit.

PH-2* Public Health Urban Greening Trees and green infrastructure Incorporate trees and green infrastructure into all capital projects where feasible.

PH-3* Public Health Air Quality Prohibit truck parking and idling in neighborhoods
Place no truck parking and no idling zones judiciously to reinforce but not overburden truck operations. Install signs in strategic locations such as residential areas and near sensitive receptors (schools, hospitals, parks) indicating no-idling zones and displaying the associated fines.

PH-4 Public Health Trucks Encourage clean trucks Condition all new developments to accommodate electric truck access only. Extract clean truck fee from truck-generating uses not meeting emissions testing requirements.

PH-5 Public Health EV/AV Adoption Encourage private electric vehicle adoption and usage
Add electric vehicle charging infrastructure for vehicles and bicycles and provide education on electric vehicle (EV) subsidy or rebate/incentive programs.

PH-6 Public Health Noise Improve sound wall Improve the sound wall by increasing size or effectiveness of the sound barrier.

PH-7 Public Health Air Quality Air filtration systems at sensitive locations
Install or replace high-quality air filtration systems in senior centers, schools, and other public facilities and regularly assess, maintain, and upgrade filtration systems to ensure optimal performance.

S-1* Safety Street Design Safety improvements at
intersections
Install safety treatments per the Intersection Safety Recommendations in Chapter 5. These treatments include but are not limited to:
• Lighting, which includes roadway lighting, visiblity of signage, reflectivity, and lighting of pedestrians and bicyclists • High-visibility crosswalks, curb ramps, and curb extensions • Conflict zone markings for bicycle crossings
• Geometric changes
• Accessible pedestrian push buttons, pedestrian countdown signals, and bicycle detection at signalized intersections
S-2* Safety Speeding Reduce speeding
Add speed limit signs and radar speed feedback signs at high speed locations. Study opportunity to follow through on the legal process for speed limit reduction. When legalized, implement pilot of speed safety cameras.

S-3 Safety Monitoring Monitor high-risk intersections
for speeding, red light running,
etc.

Install monitoring systems for near-miss events, speeding, red light running, etc. at high-risk intersections.
v*Priority Strategies with an implementation plan in Chapter 5. S-3vvbv Table 2: Full List of Strategies
50 51
1609
RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN Strategies
Table 2: Full List of Strategies (cont.)
ID Topic Subtopic Strategy Name Goals Alignment Description WB-1* Walking and
Biking Street Design Upgrade bikeways and connect sidewalk gaps Upgrade the Bay Trail to align with Bay Trail Design Guidelines, including adding clear and visible signage. Realign Bay Trail between Hensley St and Gertrude Ave to western side of Castro St and Richmond Parkway. Create buffers from vehicle traffic using landscaping. Install bike facilities to separate bicyclists from motor vehicles where Bay Trail is not present, and install rumble strips offset from the median and along the white edgeline of the road. Install new sidewalks to close sidewalk gaps. Where sidewalk is missing on one side of the street along inactive land uses, coordinate with future developers to install sidewalks. Coordinate with the Living Levy project plans to improve pedestrian and operations access from the east along Pittsburg Ave.

WB-2* Walking and
Biking
Wildcat Creek Trail
Crossing
On-street Wildcat Creek Trail
crossing
Develop at-grade signalized multi-use crossing of Wildcat Creek Trail, install lighting, and add wayfinding signage to indicate distance traveled or what facilities are provided/nearby. In the long-term, consider a grade-separated overcrossing for the Wildcat Creek Trail over the Richmond Parkway.

WB-3 Walking and
Biking New Technology
Test innovative bicycle and
pedestrian detection at
intersections
Test new technologies (e.g. LiDAR, AI) that can help a traffic signal predict the arrival of a bicyclist or pedestrian and maintain signal protection until they have exited the intersection.

WB-4 Walking and
Biking Shared Mobility Expand electric bike share program Support expansion of Richmond’s bikeshare program.

DG-1*
Driving
and Goods
Movement
Cycle Length Upgrade and coordinate traffic
signals
Implement signal coordination along the Parkway in the peak period and optimize corridor-wide cycle lengths. Consider signal operations, pedestrian delay, and impact on speed. Install a connected battery backup system and a central signal management system. Upgrade signal hardware and software to allow automated traffic signal performance measures. Investigate, test, and deploy a system that allows for emergency vehicle preemption and transit prioritization at signalized intersections. Consider an adaptive traffic signal system and connected vehicle applications.

DG-2
Driving
and Goods
Movement
Congestion Add carpool lane on segments
with high congestion
Study the conversion of the northbound right turn lane into a high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane for bus, carpool, and right turn only in the afternoon peak period. Implement recommendations in MTC’s I-580 Richmond Parkway Interchange Operational Improvements project.

DG-3
Driving
and Goods
Movement
Street Design Redesign Richmond Parkway/
Castro Street merge
Study reallocating merge capacity through restriping Richmond Parkway at the Castro Street merge to be one lane or introduce metering on Castro Street to control queues. Improve guidance for drivers through signage and striping.

DG-4
Driving
and Goods
Movement
Signage/
Wayfinding Signage for blind turns Add a yield or prepare to stop sign/signal ahead of blind turns.

DG-5
Driving
and Goods
Movement
Signage/
Wayfinding Install wayfinding for drivers Install gateway and wayfinding signage directing drivers on which lanes to use to access key destinations. v*Priority Strategies with an implementation plan in Chapter 5. S-3 52 53 1610
RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN Strategies
Table 2: Full List of Strategies (cont.)
ID Topic Subtopic Strategy Name Goals Alignment Description M-1* Maintenance Roadway
Implement a Roadway
Pavement, Maintenance, and
Shared Use Path Management
Program
Implement a consistent management program assigned to upkeep the Parkway and provide a plan on what maintenance is, how it is performed, how it can be budgeted, and why it is needed.

County and the City to approve an MOU for advancement by providing a statement of staff time commitments, legal resources, actual support from elected officials, and review process. Identify a cross-jurisdictional maintenance manager to implement the program to rehabilitate and maintain pavement quality and striping along the corridor, as well as maintenance to extend the service life of shared use path pavement and improve user experience and ride quality for bicyclists. This program would also apply to signage, tree, debris, and signal maintenance.

M-2 Maintenance Encampments Keep sidewalks and paths
clear near encampments
Partner with advocacy group for unhoused, such as SOS Richmond and Contra Costa Health, Housing and Homeless Services, to encourage people experiencing homeless to keep sidewalks and paths clear.

M-3 Maintenance Illegal Dumping Discourage illegal dumping Reduce illegal dumping on the corridor via fencing and provide education on how to properly dispose of waste.

T-1* Transit Richmond Parkway
Transit Center
Improve access to the
Richmond Parkway Transit
Center
Develop formal pedestrian connection between the northwest corner of the Richmond Parkway Transit Center and Richmond Parkway. Upgrade faded crosswalk markings within the Transit Center.

Install bike lockers at the Richmond Parkway Transit Center consistent with the Association of Pedestrian & Bicycle Professionals guidance. Install bus pullout stops to allow buses to directly serve the Transit Center from the Parkway as recommended in the WCCTC Express Bus Implementation Plan (2020).

T-2 Transit TransitBus/Shuttle Improve bus stop comfort Enhance bus stops with features like seating, shelters, lighting, and real-time displays.

T-3 Transit TransitBus/Shuttle New transit service to Marin County
Study a bus line that connects Central/North Richmond and Hilltop to Marin across the RichmondSan Rafael Bridge.

T-4 Transit TransitBus/Shuttle Increase bus frequency Increase frequencies of AC Transit buses serving the corridor subject to AC Transit’s Realign Plan.

T-5 Transit TransitBus/Shuttle On-demand shuttle service Support continued operation and expansion of Richmond Moves on-demand shuttle, including to jobs centers.

T-6 Transit Parking Parking lot for transit to Marin
County
To serve the large number of residents in the corridor commuting to the North Bay, study park-andride opportunities supporting transit service into Marin County.

T-7 Transit Accessibility Publicize transit options/
information
Make transit schedules more accessible, expand education for Clipper Card usage, and publicize different transit options.
v S-3
*Priority Strategies with an implementation plan in Chapter 5. 54 55
1611
2 3

1. Pedestrian and bicycle crossing at W
Ohio Ave and Garrard Blvd.

2. Flooded Wildcat Creek Trail tunnel.

3. Informal pedestrian access point to
the Richmond Parkway Transit Center
currently subject to inclement weather.
1 56
1612
Priority Strategies
CHAPTER 5
Priority Strategies
One of the priority strategies is to
implement safety treatments at
intersections, such as protected rightturn phases at Richmond Parkway and Ohio Avenue.
1613

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The Plan identifies ten priority strategies
to advance first based on their ability to
address the Plan’s six goals outlined in
Chapter 1, existing needs in Chapter 2,
and community engagement feedback
in Chapter 3. All the priority strategies
shown in Table 3 meet many or most
goals and received the most support
through the online survey, pop-ups, and
community meetings on the strategies.

This chapter provides cutsheets describing
the strategies’ associated actions, benefits,
timeframes, lead and coordinating
agencies, and cost ranges shown below.

Table 3: Priority Strategies
ID Topic Strategy Name Goals Alignment
PH-1 Public Health Implement new truck routes
PH-2 Public Health Trees and green infrastructure
PH-3 Public Health Prohibit truck parking and idling in neighborhoods
S-1 Safety Safety improvements at intersections
S-2 Safety Reduce speeding
WB-1 Walking and Biking Upgrade bikeways and connect sidewalk gaps
WB-2 Walking and Biking On-street Wildcat Creek Trail crossing DG-1 Driving and Goods
Movement Upgrade and coordinate traffic signals
M-1 Maintenance Implement a Roadway Pavement and
Maintenance Management Program
T-1 Transit Improve access to the Richmond Parkway
Transit Center
v S-3vv
= Meets Many Goals = Meets Most Goals
$$$$ = <$1M $$$$ = $1M-5M
$$$$ = $6M-$10M $$$$ = $11M+
58 1614
Priority Strategies
Update designated truck routes
Update designated truck routes in North Richmond, where there are large industrial-use generators, to ensure connections between truck-generating uses and the Parkway avoid residential neighborhoods to the extent feasible.

Enforce designated truck routes
Install cameras for automated monitoring and enforcement of heavy vehicles exceeding weight limit.

Implement new truck routes
PH-1 PUBLIC HEALTH
Completion
Timeframe
0 to 2 years
Lead Agency
Contra Costa
County: Planning,
Public Works
Goals Alignment
Meets Most Goals
Coordinating
Agency
WCCTC, CHP, CalTrans,
City of San Pablo, City
of Richmond
Actions
Benefits
Improved neighborhood sound quality
Reducing truck-related noise pollution, which can be damaging above 85 decibels 50 feet away, can decrease stress and improve sleep quality.1
Reduced exposure to emissions
Trucks emit pollutants at a rate of 1.15 times more than passenger vehicles, which contributes to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.2 Redirecting truck traffic from sensitive sites and residential neighborhoods reduces exposure to these emissions, leading to better air quality and fewer health issues, such as asthma.3

1. Community and Environmental Defense Services, “Truck Stops & Neighborhood Quality of Life,” https://ceds.org/truckstops/#:~:text=Mandated%20by%20the%20Federal%20Highway,(decibel)%20 50%20feet%20away, 2024.

2. EPA, US EPA Archive Document on Idling Reduction; EPA, 2024.

3. OEHHA, 2021.
$$$$
59 1615

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Map of Existing Truck Routes
Source: Richmond General Plan 2030, 2016.

PH-1
Figure 22: Map of Existing Truck Routes
60 1616
Priority Strategies
Incorporate trees and green infrastructure
Incorporate trees and green infrastructure, such as bioretention planters, into all capital projects where feasible.

Trees and green infrastructure
PH-2 PUBLIC HEALTH
Completion
Timeframe
Ongoing
Lead Agency
City of Richmond:

Public Works, Contra
Costa County: Public
Works
Goals Alignment
Meets Most Goals
Coordinating
Agency
Groundwork
Richmond, Contra
Costa County: Planning
Benefits
Improved air quality
Planting trees along sections of the nine-mile corridor would capture 213.6 metric tons of CO2 by 2050, the equivalent of removing 46 cars from the road driving a combined 529 thousand miles annually.1
Increased tree cover and lower temperatures
Adding about 800 trees to the tree cover will provide shade along the entire corridor. This strategy can lower surface temperatures by up to 11 degrees Fahrenheit, potentially preventing one in four heatwave-related deaths, particularly in low-income communities of color like along the Parkway.2 Improved drainage and water quality
Bioretention planters provide, on average, 56% to 89% stormwater volume reduction and are proven to filter pollutants from stormwater.3

1. ESA, 2024.

2. Rx FOR HOT CITIES, 2023.

3. EPA, NPDES: Stormwater Best Management Practice—Bioretention (Rain Gardens), 2021, https:// www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-11/bmp-bioretention-rain-gardens.pdf.

Actions
$$$$
61 1617

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Street trees
Increased tree cover improves air
quality by removing particulate matter,
and reduces surface temperatures by
providing shade and increasing moisture
in the air.

Image source: City of Wahoo.

Bioretention planters
Installing bioretention planters helps
manage stormwater runoff by capturing,
treating, and absorbing runoff from
the street, while recharging the local
groundwater supply.

Image source: Office of Water Programs,
California State University, Sacramento.

Additional Details PH-2
62 1618
Priority Strategies
Install signage prohibiting truck activity
Place no truck parking and no idling zones judiciously to reinforce but not overburden truck operations. Install signs in strategic locations such as residential areas and near sensitive receptors (e.g. schools, hospitals, parks) indicating no-idling zones and displaying the associated fines.

Prohibit truck parking and
idling in neighborhoods
PH-3 PUBLIC HEALTH
Benefits Additional Details
Completion
Timeframe
0 to 2 years
Lead Agency
Contra Costa
County: Planning,
City of Richmond:

Public Works,
BAAQMD
Goals Alignment
Meets Many Goals
Coordinating Agency
City of Richmond:

Planning, Contra Costa
County: Planning, CHP
Improved air quality
Trucks idle at a rate of 1 gallon of diesel per
hour on average, which releases more than 500
pounds of CO2 emissions per day.1 This
strategy would reduce exposure to these truck
emissions.

Reduced health risks
Higher CO2 levels contribute significantly to the
prevalence of asthma and the risk of heart and
lung disease. Reducing emissions will positively
affect the 99th and 98th percentile asthma
rates near the Parkway in the North Richmond
and the Iron Triangle neighborhoods.2

1. EPA, US EPA Archive Document on Idling
Reduction; EPA, 2024.

2. California Office of Environmental Health
Hazard Assessment, 2021.

Actions
No-idling
signage
No-idling signs are
enforcement signs
regarding truck
parking or idling
and can include
associated fines.

Detering this truck
activity can improve
the local air quality.

Image source: Traffic
Signs.
$$$$
63 1619

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Install safety enhancements
Install safety treatments per the following Intersection Safety Recommendations pages. These treatments include but are not limited to: high visibility crosswalks, curb ramps and curb extensions/ bulbouts, lighting (overhead lighting, pedestrian- and bicyclist-scale lighting, bus stop lighting, visiblity and reflectivity of signage), turn delineators to slow down left turn speeds, conflict zone markings for bicycle crossings, pedestrian refuge islands, and removing slip lanes.

Improve safety at signalized intersections
Install safety treatments per the following Intersection Safety Recommendations pages. These treatments include but are not limited to: accessible pedestrian push buttons, pedestrian countdown signals, bicycle detection, striped trail crossings, and No Right Turn on Red signage.

Safety improvements at intersections
S-1 SAFETY $$$$
Benefits
Safer streets for all
This strategy could lead to a 7% reduction in all collisions.1 Safer streets for bicyclists and pedestrians
This strategy could lead to a 43% reduction in injury collisions involving bicyclists or pedestrians.1

1. Caltrans, Local Roadway Safety Manual, 2024; City of Richmond Bicycle and Pedestrian Action Plan, 2023; City of Richmond General Plan, 2012; City of Richmond Local Road Safety Plan, 2023; Contra Costa County General Plan, 2005; Fehr and Peers, 2024; FHWA, CMF Clearinghouse, 2024; San Pablo General Plan, 2011.

Actions
Completion
Timeframe
6 to 10 years
Lead Agency
Contra Costa County:

Public Works, City
of Richmond: Public
Works
Goals Alignment
Meets Most Goals
Coordinating
Agency
Caltrans, MTC, West
County Wastewater,

CCTA, BNSF
64 1620
Priority Strategies
Intersection Safety Recommendations
Recommendations include universal treatments appropriate at each intersection and site-specific treatments for use at select treatments on the corridor. These recommendations build upon the City of Richmond Bicycle and Pedestrian Action Plan (2023), City of Richmond Local Road Safety Plan (2023), City of Richmond General Plan (2012), San Pablo General Plan (2011), and Contra Costa County General Plan (2005).

TREATMENTS AT EVERY INTERSECTION

TREATMENTS AS NEEDED
Mark all crosswalks with high-visibility striping
and advance stop bars to improve pedestrian
crossing visibility.

HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
Install directional ADA curb ramps.

ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS
Install audible pedestrian signals and accessible
push buttons at crossings.

ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS
Provide protected right-turn phase to remove
vehicle-bike and vehicle-pedestrian conflicts in
time.

PROTECTED RIGHT-TURN PHASE
Install pedestrian countdown timers to display
the crossing time remaining.

PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN SIGNALS
Improve overhead, pedestrian-scale, and bus
stop lighting to increase visibility of all road
users. Increase visibility and reflectivity of all
signage.

LIGHTING AND REFLECTIVITY
Install reflective backplates on signals to enhance
the visibility of traffic signals.

REFLECTIVE BACKPLATES
Install bike detection at signalized intersections.

BIKE DETECTION
Enforce right-turn only lane by installing a ONLY far-side bulbout and enhancing related signage.

ENFORCE RIGHT-TURN ONLY LANES
Install railroad crossing arms for pedestrian and
bicyclist safety.

RAILROAD CROSSING ARMS
Provide pedestrians a place to wait if they are
unable to finish crossing an intersection.

MEDIAN REFUGE ISLANDS
Reduce curb radii to slow down vehicle turning
speeds, tighten pedestrian and bicyclist crossing
distances, and provide more sidewalk space for
queuing.

TIGHTEN CURB RADII
Stripe crosswalk to indicate trail crossing and
improve user visibility.

STRIPE TRAIL CROSSING
Straighten crosswalks to improve sightlines and
shorten pedestrian crossing distances.

STRAIGHTEN CROSSWALKS
Install a raised crosswalk in the right-turn slip
lane to reduce turning speeds.

RAISED CROSSWALKS
Prohibit vehicle right-turn on red at path and
separated bikeway crossings of the minor street
to reduce conflicts.

NO RIGHT-TURN ON RED
Install protected intersection to support bicyclist
turning movements and create slower
interactions and clear sightlines.

MAJOR BIKE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
Enhance or create new active transportation
connection between bike facility and the Parkway
with lighting and maintenance.

MINOR BIKE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
Where large vehicles must turn, install a
porkchop island to reduce crossing distances and
provide a raised crosswalk to reduce speeds.

INSTALL PORKCHOP ISLAND

WITH RAISED CROSSWALK
Figure 23:Intersection Safety Recommendations
65 1621

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Intersection Safety Recommendations (Cont.)
580 Provide intersection improvements
to be determined through MTCʼs
I-580/Richmond Parkway
Operational Improvements Project.

Install underpass
lighting to improve
visibility for all
users.

Provide protected phases for
southbound and westbound right-turns.
.5 mi N
Ohio Ave
W Macdonald Ave
Nevin Ave
W Bissell Ave
Castro St
Richmond Pkwy
W Barrett Ave 1st St 2nd St
Pennsylvania Ave
Richmond Ln
Mills St
Hensley St
W Gertrude Ave
W Chanslor Ave
Existing Signalized Intersection
At-Grade Railroad Crossing
Transit Stop
ONLY
S-1
South Segment:

I-580 to Hensley St
See individual
recommendation icon
details on page 65.

Figure 24:Intersection Safety Recommendations (Cont.)
66 1622
Priority Strategies
See proposed
Wildcat Creek Trail
signalized crossing
diagram.
.5 mi N
W Gertrude Ave
Parr Blvd
Pittsburg Ave
Richmond Pkwy
Wildcat Creek
Goodrick Ave
Existing Signalized Intersection
Proposed Signalized Intersection
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
Central Segment:

West Gertrude Ave
to Goodrick Ave
See individual
recommendation icon
details on page 65.
67 1623

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
80 *Intersection counts not taken.

Consider
right-turn phasing
depending on
changing land
uses/Hilltop
Specific Plan.

Redesign ramp
geometry to
reduce vehicle
speeds.
.5 mi N
San Pablo Ave
Lakeside Dr

BELLA VISTA
Hilltop Dr
Atlas Rd
Richmond Pkwy
Blume Dr
Signalized Intersection
Transit Stop

RICHMOND

PARKWAY

TRANSIT
CENTER
Intersection Safety Recommendations (Cont.) S-1
North Segment:

Giant Hwy
Ramp to I-80
See individual
recommendation icon
details on page 65.
68 1624
Priority Strategies
Install speed-monitoring systems
Add radar speed feedback signs or implement pilot of speed cameras at high speeding locations.

Speed cameras are currently not allowed under state law, but legislation passed in 2023, Assembly Bill 645, authorizes six designated cities across California to implement a speed camera pilot program.

Indicate speed limits
Add speed limit signs and lower the speed limit throughout the Parkway if allowed under state law.

Reduce speeding
S-2 SAFETY
Benefits
Additional Details
Actions
Completion
Timeframe
3 to 5 years
Lead Agency
City of Richmond:

Public Works, Contra
Costa County: Public
Works
Goals Alignment
Meets Many Goals
Coordinating
Agency
City of Richmond: PD;
California Highway
Patrol
Safer streets for all
This strategy could lead to a 20% reduction in all collisions.1

1. Caltrans, Local Roadway Safety Manual, 2024; FHWA, CMF Clearinghouse, 2024.

Radar speed signs
Radar speed feedback signs are cost-effective
traffic calming solutions that reduce average
vehicle speeds and slow speeding drivers.

Image Source: Trafficalm.
$$$$
69 1625

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Upgrade bikeways and connect sidewalk gaps
WB-1 WALKING AND BIKING $$$$
Lead Agency
City of Richmond:

Public Works, Contra
Costa County: Public
Works
Coordinating
Agency
MTC, CCTA, WCCTC, City
of Pinole, EBRPD
Goals Alignment
Meets Most Goals
Benefits
Increased access for pedestrians
Creates a more direct and usable path for pedestrians along the entire Parkway, improving connections to bus stops, Richmond Parkway Transit Center, nearby parks, schools, and community services.

Increased access for bicyclists1
Upgrade Bay Trail facilities
Upgrade the Bay Trail to align with Bay Trail Design Guidelines, including adding clear and visible signage. Realign Bay Trail between Hensley St and Gertrude Ave to western side of Castro St and Richmond Parkway. Create buffers from vehicle traffic using landscaping. Coordinate with the Living Levy project plans to improve pedestrian and operations access from the east along Pittsburg Ave.

Install high-quality on-street bikeways
Install bike facilities, independent of the Bay Trail, to separate bicyclists from motor vehicles and install rumble strips, which alert drivers when their vehicle encroaches into a bicycle facility, offset from the median and along the white edgeline of the road.

Close sidewalk gaps
Install new sidewalks to close sidewalk gaps. Where sidewalk is missing on one side of the street along inactive land uses, condition future developers to install sidewalks.

Actions
Completion
Timeframe
6 to 10 years
Within 20 minutes, residents
near the North segment would
be able to access up to...
2x more amenities2
3x more jobs
3x more park area by
biking
Within 20 minutes, residents
near the South segment would
be able to access up to...
10% more amenities2
20% more jobs
5% more park area by
biking
Within 20 minutes, residents
near the Central segment would
be able to access up to...
5x more amenities2

2.5x more jobs
4x more park area by
biking

1. ESA, 2024; TravelAccess+, Fehr and Peers, 2024; LEHD, 2023.

2. Amenities include day cares, hospitals, schools, supermarkets and emergency services. 70 1626
Priority Strategies
Sidewalk Gaps and Recommended Bikeways
Source: Richmond Bicycle and Pedestrian Action Plan, 2023.

Missing sidewalks on both sides of street
Missing sidewalks on one side of street
Study Corridor
Richmond Parkway Transit Center
Existing bike lane
Proposed separated bike lane
Proposed Bay Trail realignment
Existing Bay Trail
Wildcat Creek Trail Crossing
Richmond Parkway
Richmond Parkway

RICHMOND
Castro St
Sample Separated Bikeway Design Concept
For detailed design between San Pablo Ave and Pinole
Vista Crossing Shopping Center, see Appendix B.

LANDSCAPED SEPARATED BIKEWAY
Hensl e y St
Figure 25:Sidewalk Gaps and Recommended Bikeways
71 1627

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
On-street Wildcat Creek Trail crossing
WB-2 WALKING AND BIKING
Lead Agency
Contra Costa
County: Public
Works
Coordinating
Agency
EBRPD, City of
Richmond: Public Works,
MTC, West County
Wastewater, WCCTC
Goals Alignment
Meets Many Goals
Benefits
Increased multimodal access
Improving the Wildcat Creek Trail Crossing through near-term improvements would connect nearly 1 mile of trail east of the Parkway with 1.4 miles of trail west of the Parkway when the underpass is flooded, resulting in a total of 2.2 miles of low stress bicycle facilities. 1 Improved crossing usage and experience
Provides a functioning, year-round crossing resilient to sea level rise effects and resolves the current flooding of the existing tunnel.

Add a signalized crossing
Develop at-grade signalized multi-use crossing of Wildcat Creek Trail, install lighting, add signage along Wildcat Creek Trail to indicate distance traveled or what facilities are provided/nearby.

Actions
Completion
Timeframe
3 to 5 years

1. Fehr & Peers, 2024.

Note: Previous planning efforts, such as the San Francisco Estuary Partnership’s Restoring Wildcat Creek: Community-Led Watershed Health Update and Priority Project Implementation project, have identified a community desire for a grade-separated crossing at this location. The Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan recommends installing a signalized crossing and evaluating the safety and use of the crossing as an initial step before advancing a bridge design. $$$$
72 1628
Priority Strategies
Proposed Signalized Crossing at Wildcat Creek Trail
100
N
Wildcat Creek Trail
Wildcat Creek
Trailhead
Richmond Parkway
Richmond Parkway Wildcat Creek Trail Crossing
Proposed Signalized Crossing
New Trail Connection
New
Signal
Wildcat Creek Trail
Coordinate with the
East Bay Regional Park
District to create trail
connection through
the existing fence.

Extend curb line
to slow turning
vehicles.

Existing Tunnel Alignment
Tunnel frequently
floods, requiring trail
users to turn back.

Figure 26:Proposed Signalized Crossing at Wildcat Creek Trail 73 1629

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Implement signal coordination
Implement signal coordination along the Parkway in the peak period and optimize corridor-wide cycle lengths. Consider signal operations, pedestrian delay, and impact on speed.

Upgrade signal infrastructure
Install a connected battery backup system and a central signal management system. Upgrade signal hardware and software to allow automated traffic signal performance measures. Investigate, test, and deploy a system that allows for emergency vehicle preemption and transit prioritization at signalized intersections. Consider an adaptive traffic signal system and connected vehicle applications.

Upgrade and coordinate traffic signals
in the northbound direction in
the afternoon peak period.
in the southbound direction in
the morning peak period.
13 minutes 3 minutes

1. Fehr & Peers, SimTraffic Model, 2024. Travel time savings are greater in the northbound direction since it is more heavily impacted by existing traffic congestion, particularly during the evening commute period as discussed in Chapter 2.

DG-1 DRIVING AND GOODS MOVEMENT
Travel time savings1
Coordinating the signals along
the Parkway could save drivers
up to...

Reduced idling
Time travel savings may reduce vehicle emissions and driver frustrations from sitting at lights, discouraging dangerous driving actions such as running red lights, speeding, and driving on the shoulder lane.

Improved emergency services and bus reliability
Signal priority for emergency services or transit at signalized intersections can improve the speed of emergency responders in reaching a scene and increase the time available for making critical decisions, as well as improve or increase bus reliability along the corridor.

Completion
Timeframe
3 to 5 years
Lead Agency
City of Richmond:

Public Works; Contra
Costa County: CCTA
Goals Alignment
Meets Many Goals
Coordinating
Agency
Caltrans, MTC
Actions
Benefits
$$$$
74 1630
Priority Strategies
Traffic signal coordination
Coordinating traffic signals synchronizes the
timing of multiple intersections to improve traffic
flow and reduce delays. This can result in less
braking, improve goods movement efficiency,
and discourage neighborhood cut-through traffic.

Image source: UDOT.

Emergency vehicle preemption (EVP) technology
EVP technologies allow signals to modify their signal timing to provide a green light as soon as possible for an approaching emergency vehicle.

Image source: Maripoca Association of Governments.

Additional Details
75 1631

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Implement a corridor-wide maintenance program with a maintenance manager Implement a consistent management program assigned to upkeep the Parkway and provide a plan on what maintenance is, how it is performed, how it can be budgeted, and why it is needed. The County and the City first need to approve an MOU for advancement by providing a statement of staff time commitments, legal resources, actual support from elected officials, and review process.

The program will need to determine the feasible maintenance level, associated analyses, and implementation costs for, but not limited to, the following items: roadway pavement, striping, shared use path pavement, signage life, signals, street lights, street sweeping, drainage systems, and vegetation. Following program development, which may be developed with the assistance of a maintenance consultant, identify a cross-jurisdictional maintenance manager for implementation.

Implement a Roadway Pavement and
Maintenance Management Program

1. SMOOTHNESS MATTERS, Asphalt Pavement Alliance, 2008, https://www.co-asphalt.com/assets/ docs/Asphalt_Smoothness_Matters_Downloadable.pdf.

2. How Pavement and Bridge Conditions Affect Transportation System Performance, FHWA, 2023, https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop22077/fhwahop22077.pdf M-1 MAINTENANCE
Reduced emissions and costs to drivers2
Improved pavement conditions could save drivers up to 4%-10% of fuel consumption, repair and maintenance, and tire wear.1
Improved safety
Improved pavement friction at intersections provides numerous benefits: improved driver control, reduced stopping distances, reduced skidding, and a 20% reduction in total intersection crashes.2 Improved coordination and response
Consolidating maintenance responsibilities under one central manager allows for improved coordination between agencies, cost savings due to consolidation, and more timely response to concerns.

Completion
Timeframe
0 to 4 years
Lead Agency
Contra Costa County:

Public Works, City of
Richmond: Public Works
Goals Alignment
Meets Most Goals
Coordinating
Agency

CCTA, WCCTC
Actions
Benefits
$$$$
76 1632
Priority Strategies
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Scores
Consistent pavement maintenance helps extend the useful life of pavement. PCI scores measure the health of a road's pavement, ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). A PCI score of at least 70 is desired.

Factors that affect a PCI score include the age of the pavement/when the roadway was last paved, climate and precipitation, traffic loads, and available maintenance funding. Keeping the Parkway in good pavement condition will require more constant maintenance due to consistent heavy truck traffic; this may include pavement milling and overlaying with digouts, pavement reconstruction, and slurry sealing.

MTC's StreetSaver software includes network PCI data as well as projected PCI information, assuming various maintenance scenarios, to help jurisdictions make maintenance decisions.

Image source: AA Roads.

Additional Details
Castro Street approaching Richmond Lane in good pavement condition (high PCI score) 77 1633

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Improve access to the Richmond
Parkway Transit Center
T-1 TRANSIT
Benefits
Improve transit reliability
Access enhancements would reduce travel time delays associated with buses circulating within the RPTC, saving approximately 13,000 annual rider hours for WestCAT express routes. Time travel savings across operators would be greater.1
Support potential mode shift
Providing secure bicycle lockers for long term parking (2+ hours) encourages bicycle owners to bike to transit as a first/last mile connection.2
Improve pedestrian experience
Creating a direct formal pedestrian connection from the Parkway would enhance comfort and access for users who currently walk through landscaping or take a less direct route from Blume Drive to enter the RPTC. Providing a marked crosswalk will also improve visibility of these pedestrians.

Completion
Timeframe
3 to 5 years
Lead Agency
AC Transit, City of
Richmond: Public
Works, MTC
Goals Alignment
Meets Many Goals
Coordinating
Agency
Caltrans, CCTA,
WestCAT, WCCTC
Support transit access
Install bus pullout stops on Richmond Parkway for Richmond Parkway Transit Center (RPTC) routes and shift eastbound bikeway south of the bus stops. These bus bays would allow southbound buses traveling from I-80 or eastbound buses from Richmond Parkway to serve riders without turning onto Blume Drive and circulating within the Transit Center, saving a significant amount of time (northbound or westbound buses would still be required to enter the Transit Center).1 Support pedestrian access
Develop formal pedestrian connection between the northwest corner of the RPTC and Richmond Parkway. Upgrade faded crosswalk markings within the Transit Center.

Provide bicycle storage
Install bike lockers at the RPTC consistent with the Association of Pedestrian & Bicycle Professionals guidance.

Actions
$$$$
78 1634
Priority Strategies
Additional Details
Richmond Parkway Transit
Center Access Enhancement
Improvements would install three new
curbside bus stops, a rerouted separated
bikeway, and a direct pedestrian connection for
users coming in and out of the RPTC.

Source: West Contra Costa County Express Bus
Implementation Plan, WCCTC, 2020.

Bike lockers
Providing bike lockers will provide safe
storage areas for people to store their bicycles,
supporting a potential mode shift, as secure
bicycle storage does not currently exist at the
Richmond Parkway Transit Center.

Blume Dr
Richmond Parkway
Transit Center
Richmond Pkwy

1. West Contra Costa County Express Bus Implementation Plan, WCCTC, 2020.

2. Bicycle and Transit Integration, A Practical Transit Agency Guide to Bicycle Integration and Equitable Mobility, APTA, 2018, https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/Bike_Transit_Integrartion_Booklet_ APTA-SUDS-UD-RP-009-18.pdf.
79 1635
2 3

1. Existing trees along Richmond Parkway
sequester emissions, provide shade, and
create a more interesting and welcoming
roadway environment.

2. Unique bike crossing striping indicates
the existence of the Bay Trail at Richmond
Parkway and W MacDonald Ave.

3. Graffiti on Bay Trail and bike signage
reduces the visibility of signs and
contributes to a neglected environment feel.
1 80
1636
Implementation and Funding
CHAPTER 6
Implementation
and Funding
Additional funding is needed to upgrade the Bay Trail
along Richmond Parkway to align with Bay Trail Design
Guidelines, as outlined in the priority strategies.
1637
RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN Implementation and Funding Category ID Strategy Name Lead Agencies Coordinating Agencies Cost Estimate1 Completion Timeframe
Public Health
PH-1 Implement new truck routes Contra Costa County: Planning, Public Works
WCCTC, CHP, Caltrans, City of San Pablo, City
of Richmond
Planning: $40,000
Truck monitoring/enforcement camera:
$30,000 per location, a total of 23 signals
along the corridor
0-2 years
PH-2 Incorporate trees and green
infrastructure
City of Richmond: Public Works;
Contra Costa County: Public Works
Groundwork Richmond, Contra Costa
County: Planning $2,900,000 to $7,420,000 per mile2, 3 Ongoing PH-3 Prohibit truck parking and idling
in neighborhoods
Contra Costa County: Planning;
City of Richmond: Public Works
BAAQMD, City of Richmond: Planning, Contra
Costa County: Planning, CHP
Planning: $5,000
Sign installation: $700 per sign 0-2 years
Safety
S-1 Install safety improvements at
intersections
Contra Costa County: Public Works;
City of Richmond: Public Works
Caltrans, MTC, West County Wastewater,
CCTA $1,100,000 per intersection 6-10 years
S-2 Reduce speeding City of Richmond: Public Works;
Contra Costa County: Public Works City of Richmond: PD, CHP Speed limit study: $10,000Speed signs: $55,000 per location4 0-2 years Walking and
Biking
WB-1 Upgrade bikeways and connect
sidewalk gaps
City of Richmond: Public Works;
Contra Costa County: Public Works MTC, CCTA, WCCTC, City of Pinole, EBRPD Sidewalks: $4,400,000 per mile
Separated Bikeways: $18,000,000 per mile
Bay Trail: $7,960,0005
6-10 years
WB-2 Install on-street Wildcat Creek
Trail crossing Contra Costa County: Public Works EBRPD, City of Richmond: Public Works, MTC, West County Wastewater, WCCTC $2,560,000 3-5 years Driving and Goods
Movement DG-1 Upgrade and coordinate traffic signals
City of Richmond: Public Works;
CCTA Caltrans $5,500,000 for the corridor (23
intersections) 3-5 years
Maintenance M-1
Implement a Roadway Pavement
and Maintenance Management
Program
Contra Costa County: Public Works;
City of Richmond: Public Works CCTA, WCCTC $32,790,0006 0-4 years Transit T-1 Improve access to the Richmond
Parkway Transit Center
AC Transit; City of Richmond:

Public Works; MTC Caltrans, CCTA, WestCAT, WCCTC
Parkway bus stops and pedestrian
connection: $1,297,000
Bicycle lockers: $55,500
3-5 years
identified as lead are charged with
advancing the assigned strategies and
ensuring adequate funding and staffing for
implementation. Coordinating agencies may
have prior planning knowledge or funding
streams valuable for implementation,
be working on similar efforts or efforts
affected by the strategy, or have a role
in post-implementation operation. For
example, MTC and East Bay Regional
Parks District (EBRPD) could have a
role in identifying funding for Bay Trail
improvements in strategy WB-1. These
priority strategies will bring substantial
improvements to the corridor and lead
agencies can look for opportunities to
initiate these strategies immediately
regardless of completion timeframe.

4. Speed cameras currently not permitted under state law. Costs to be determined when legalized. 5. Includes cost of Bay Trail realignment between Gertrude Avenue and Hensley Street and path widening between Parr Boulevard and Gertrude Avenue. 6. Only reflects costs to upgrade corridor pavement to a Pavement Condition Index of at least 70. Completion timeframe covers program development. Additional costs will vary depending on program development.

Table 4: Priority Strategies
Implementation Plan

IMPLEMENTING

THE PRIORITY

STRATEGIES
Given the regional and economic importance and
9-mile span of the Parkway, implementation will
require multi-jurisdictional efforts and substantial
funding. Table 4 highlights partnership opportunities
and jurisdictional responsibility for each of the
priority strategies introduced in Chapter 5. For
each priority strategy, lead agencies, coordinating
agencies, cost estimates, and completion timeframes
for delivering the strategy are listed. Agencies

1. Assumes a 4% inflation rate with construction occurring in 2030. Some costs may be duplicated across strategies, such as landscaping under PH-2 and landscape separated bikeways under WB-1, and cameras under PH-1 and traffic signal upgrades under DG-1.2. Funding already secured via CNRA Urban Greening Grant for tree planting along Richmond Parkway adjacent to Atchison Village and in North Richmond. Other segments require funding. 82 3. Low end of range assumes general landscaping only, while high end of range assumes bioretention with landscaping. 83 1638

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Action Priority Strategy ID(s) Immediate Steps Future Steps Advance 35%
design concept for
northern segment
of Richmond
Parkway1
PH-2 S-1
S-2 WB-1
WB-2 T-1
Pursue grant funding
sources that cover multiple
strategy categories, such
as RAISE Grant, RM3, and
OBAG, to finalize design and
construct project.2
Pursue funding for
concept development
for remaining
segments of the
Parkway and Bay Trail.

Implement new
truck routes PH-1 Given low implementation
cost, assess existing staffing
capacity and City/County
funding sources to advance
planning component.

Apply for funding if
needed.2
Prohibit truck
parking and idling PH-3
Upgrade and
coordinate traffic
signals
DG-1
Confirm previously-studied
recommendations from the
2019 Program for Arterial
System Synchronization
(PASS) Report.

Apply for funding and
advocate for inclusion
in CCTA's Countywide
Smart Signals Project.2
Implement
Roadway
Pavement and
Maintenance
Management
Program
M-1
Confirm the City and
County’s interest in
pursuing the action by
approving an MOU to
advance the program.

Negotiate agreement
and determine
guidelines for program
development.

To advance the priority strategies in the
near-term, Table 5 includes immediate
next steps for lead agencies to undertake,
as well as future steps. Due to the length
of the corridor, capital improvement
strategies should be grouped by corridor
segment and assembled as packages
for funding applications. For example,
Appendix B includes a 35% design
concept for a landscape separated
bikeway on the northern segment of
Richmond Parkway, which incorporates
multiple priority strategies. Lead agencies
can use the design concept to pursue
funding in the near-term to address several
existing challenges on this segment,
including a concentration of speed-related
injury collisions, absence of separated
bikeways connecting to the Richmond
Parkway Transit Center (RPTC), and an
indirect bus connection to the RPTC.

Table 5: Priority Strategies Implementation Next Steps

1. Segment includes Richmond Parkway between San Pablo Avenue and the entrance to the Pinole Vista Shopping Center. See Appendix B for the 35% design concept. 2. List of potential funding sources by priority strategy is provided in Appendix C. 84 1639
Implementation and Funding

POTENTIAL CURRENT

FUNDING SOURCES
To fully implement the many strategies in this plan, substantial funding will be needed.

A full list of potential funding sources is provided in Appendix C. A sample of current federal, state, and regional funding sources that are aligned with multiple priority strategy categories are presented below.

Bay Trail at the intersection of Hilltop
Drive and Richmond Parkway.

RAISE grants are awarded to surface
transportation projects that are
consistent with the Department’s
strategic goals and will have
significant local or regional impact.

Next Cycle: FY2025
When to Apply: Early 2025
Maximum Amount: $25M per project
Funding Source:

Rebuilding American Infrastructure with
Sustainability and Equity Grant Program (RAISE)
Federal State Regional
Administered By:

Lead Agencies:

Contra Costa County
City of Richmond
Applicable Strategies:

WB-1 DG-1 T-1
U.S. Department of
Transportation Office
of the Secretary
S-1
85 1640

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
RM3 provides funding for a
comprehensive suite of highway and
transit improvements through an increase
of tolls on the San Francisco Bay Area’s
seven state-owned toll bridges. RM3
has about $10 million that could be
allocated to the priority strategies.

Next Cycle: Monthly
When to Apply: Monthly
Maximum Amount: $160M for
Goods Movement, $150M for Bay
Trail and Safe Routes to Transit
Funding Source:

Federal State Regional
Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The HSIP Program funds work on any
public road or publicly owned bicycle or
pedestrian pathway or trail, or on tribal
lands for general use of tribal members,
that improves the safety for its users.

Next Cycle: Cycle 13
When to Apply: As early as May 2026
Maximum Amount: $10M per project
Funding Source:

Administered By:

Applicable Strategies:

WB-1
Federal State Regional
Caltrans Division of
Local Assistance
S-1 S-2
Lead Agencies:

Contra Costa County
City of Richmond
Regional Measure 3 (RM3)
Administered By:

Applicable Strategies:

WB-1
DG-1
PH-1
WB-2
Metropolitan Transportation
Commission
S-1
T-1
Lead Agencies:

Contra Costa County
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
City of Richmond
86 1641
Implementation and Funding
Local Partnership Program Formula &
Competitive Programs (LPP)
The LPP Program provides funding to
local and regional agencies to improve
aging infrastructure, road conditions,
active transportation, transit and rail,
and health and safety benefits.

Next Cycle: 2026
When to Apply: Fall 2026
Maximum Amount: $25M per project
Funding Source:

Administered By:

Applicable Strategies:

WB-1
T-1
WB-2
Federal State Regional M-1
S-1
Lead Agencies:

Contra Costa Transportation Authority
City of Richmond
Caltrans Division of
Local Assistance
One Bay Area Grant Program (OBAG)
The One Bay Area Grant (OBAG), now
in its third iteration, distributes federal
transportation funding from the Federal
Highway Administration to projects
and programs that improve safety,
spur economic development and help
the Bay Area meet climate change
and air quality improvement goals.

Next Cycle: OBAG 4
When to Apply: As early as 2026
Maximum Amount: $47.3M for
Contra Costa County for 2023-2026
Funding Source:

Administered By:

Applicable Strategies:

WB-1
DG-1
PH-2
WB-2
Federal State Regional
Metropolitan Transportation
Commission
Contra Costa Transportation
Authority
T-1
S-1
Lead Agencies:

Contra Costa County
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
City of Richmond
87 1642

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

POTENTIAL FUTURE

FUNDING SOURCES
Since the Richmond Parkway is a regional
facility, funding streams paid for by
regional users should be considered.

Potential future funding sources may
include a new sales tax, regional tollbased measure, Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD), and Benefit
Assessment District. These options
are described on the next page.

These tools could provide long-term,
stable funding sources for priority
strategies that require ongoing
efforts, such as maintenance.

Faded crosswalk and degraded pavement at
Goodrick Avenue and Richmond Parkway.
88 1643
Implementation and Funding
Regional Measures
Potential Regional Transportation
Measure for 2026
A new transportation revenue measure for
the Bay Area is being crafted and may be on a
future ballot as early as November 2026. The
measure is expected to generate at least $1
billion annually and is currently considering a
wide range of options for its revenue source.

Source: Toll station, East Bay Times (2023)
Walking and Biking
Safety Maintenance
Driving and Goods Movement
Transit
A new Bay Area-wide regional measure such
as a sales tax, property tax, or increased tolls
could fund transportation projects included in
an Expenditure Plan.

Potential Sponsors:

Metropolitan Transportation Commission
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
Applicable Strategy Categories:

Transportation Sales Tax
A new Contra Costa transportation sales tax
would generate stable funding for capital
and operating uses laid out in an Expenditure
Plan. Approval of the sales tax requires a
ballot measure with two-thirds voter support.

Potential Sponsors:

Contra Costa Transportation Authority
City of Richmond
Applicable Strategy Categories:

Contra Costa County Measure J
In November 2004, Contra Costa voters
approved Measure J with a 71% vote. The
measure provided for the continuation of the
county’s half-cent transportation sales tax for
25 more years beyond the original expiration
date of 2009. The tax revenues fund a voterapproved Expenditure Plan of transportation programs and projects. Measure C, the
precursor to Measure J passed in 1988, was
used to construct the Parkway.

Source: Smart Signal Project, Contra Costa Transportation Authority (2024)
Walking and Biking
Safety
Maintenance
Driving and Goods Movement
Transit
Public Health
89 1644

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Benefits Assessment Districts
Hilltop Landscape Maintenance
Assessment District
The City of Richmond’s Hilltop Landscape
Maintenance Assessment District provides
maintenance and servicing of landscaping
in three zones located in the northern area
of Richmond. This section of Lakeside Drive
just south of Richmond Parkway is part of
the District and serviced by this Benefit
Assessment District.

Source: Lakeside Drive, Google Maps (2022)
Maintenance
Benefit Assessment Districts are established
for a specific geographic area that receives a
special benefit from public improvements and
services, such as lighting and landscaping.

Districts are funded through a property
assessment and as a result require majority
voter approval from impacted property
owners.

Potential Sponsors:

City of Richmond
Contra Costa County
Applicable Strategy Categories:

Public Health
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD)
City of Placentia/County of Orange EIFD
The City of Placentia and County of Orange
formed the first city and county partnership
EIFD in 2019. The EIFD was formed to fund
transit-supportive and housing-supportive
infrastructure in the communities to the
north and south of the upcoming Placentia
Metrolink Station.

Source: Placentia Metrolink Station rendering, City of Placentia EIFD StoryMap, SCAG (2024)
Walking and Biking
EIFDs allow for a separate government entity
to be created by a city and/or county within a
defined area to finance infrastructure projects
with community-wide benefits. EIFDs use tax
increment financing to reallocate a portion of
future property taxes to fund infrastructure
projects, meaning this option does not
increase taxes or require voter approval.

Further analysis is needed to understand the
costs and benefits of this funding option.

Potential Sponsors:

Contra Costa County
City of Richmond
Applicable Strategy Categories:

Maintenance Transit
Public Health

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
90 1645

APPENDIX A
Community Engagement
Summary Notes

RICHMOND PARKWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
1646
2201 Broadway | Suite 602 | Oakland, CA 94612 | (510) 834-3200 | Fax (510) 253-0059 www.fehrandpeers.com
Memorandum
Date: October 19, 2023
To: Leah Greenblat, WCCTAC
From: Karina Schneider and Minnie Chen, Fehr & Peers
Subject: RPTP Phase 1 Engagement Summary
OK23-0506
Phase 1 of the Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan (RPTP) engagement focused on identifying and confirming needs. The goals of this phase were to:
• Share information about the RPTP’s purpose, process, and desired outcomes • Connect with Equity Priority Community residents who live near or use Richmond Parkway
• Confirm understanding of existing challenges and experiences using Richmond Parkway • Hear concerns and new ideas from members of the public This phase consisted of both in-person and digital strategies to reach a range of community members along the corridor between August and September 2023. This memorandum provides an overview of the Phase 1 engagement process and summarizes the feedback received.

Phase 1 Engagement Overview
Phase 1 Engagement consisted of the following strategies:

1. Pop-Ups (3)

2. Neighborhood Council Meetings (3)

3. Online Webmap (1)

4. Public Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting (2)

5. WCCTAC Board Meeting (2)
The project team also considered hosting a bike ride along the Bay Trail to collect feedback, however, MTC and Rich City Rides led a total of three bike rides in this area on April 30th, May 28th, and August 17th, 2023. Given the number of rides already hosted in the area, the project 1647
Leah Greenblat
October 19, 2023

Page 2 of 9 ends
← All documents from this meeting