Richmond City Council
May 6, 2025

Written Comments: All comments received before 3:00 pm the day of the meeting will be posted on the City’s website on the agenda page (Agenda Page Link) and provided to the City Council prior to the meeting. Written comments will not be read aloud during the meeting.

Email comments to [email protected] Please indicate which item on the agenda you are commenting on in the subject line of your email.

Please note: Updated COVID-19 safety protocols will be posted outside the City Council Chambers. Please review this information before entering the Council Chambers.

OTHER WAYS TO WATCH THE MEETING
LIVE ON CHANNEL 26. They are retelecast the following Thursday at 6:00 p.m. The Community TV Channel 26 schedule is published on the city’s website at www.ci.pinole.ca.us.

VIDEO-STREAMED LIVE ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE, www.ci.pinole.ca.us. and remain archived on the site for five (5) years.

If none of these options are available to you, or you need assistance with public comment, please contact the City Clerk, Heather Bell at (510) 724-8928 or [email protected] .

Americans With Disabilities Act: In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, if you need special assistance to participate in a City Meeting or you need a copy of the agenda, or the agenda packet in an appropriate alternative format, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (510) 724-8928. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Note: Staff reports are available for inspection on the City Website at www.ci.pinole.ca.us. You may also contact the City Clerk via e-mail at [email protected] .

Ralph M. Brown Act. Gov. Code § 54950. In enacting this chapter, the Legislature finds and declares that the public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business. It is the intent of the law that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted openly. The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies, which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.
2 of 1216
371
Pinole City Council
Agenda –January 17, 2023

1. CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IN HONOR OF THE US MILITARY TROOPS

2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Before we begin, we would like to acknowledge the Ohlone people, who are the traditional custodians of this land. We pay our respects to the Ohlone elders, past, present, and future, who call this place, Ohlone Land, the land that Pinole sits upon, their home. We are proud to continue their tradition of coming together and growing as a community. We thank the Ohlone community for their stewardship and support, and we look forward to strengthening our ties as we continue our relationship of mutual respect and understanding.

3. ROLL CALL, CITY CLERK’S REPORT & STATEMENT OF CONFLICT An official who has a conflict must, prior to consideration of the decision: (1) publicly identify in detail the financial interest that causes the conflict; (2) recuse himself /herself from discussing and voting on the matter; and (3) leave the room until after the decision has been made, Cal. Gov't Code § 87105.

4. CONVENE TO A CLOSED SESSION
Citizens may address the Council regarding a Closed Session item prior to the Council adjourning into the Closed Session, by first providing a speaker card to the City Clerk.

1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Gov. Code § 54956.8
Property: 612 Tennent

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
Gov. Code § 54956.9 (d)(1)
Name of Case: MVP Construction

5. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION TO ANNOUNCE RESULTS OF CLOSED SESSION

6. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (Public Comments)
Citizens may speak under any item not listed on the Agenda. The time limit is 3 minutes and is subject to modification by the Mayor. Individuals may not share or offer time to another speaker. Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future Council meeting. PLEASE SEE THE

COVERSHEET OF THE AGENDA FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO SUBMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS

7. REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Mayor Report

1. Announcements
B. Mayoral & Council Appointments
C. City Council Committee Reports & Communications
D. Council Requests for Future Agenda Items
E. City Manager Report / Department Staff

3 of 1216
372
City Council
Agenda – January 17, 2023

F. City Attorney Report

8. RECOGNITIONS / PRESENTATIONS / COMMUNITY EVENTS
A. Proclamations

1. Police Officer of the Year

2. Firefighter of the Year

3. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day

4. Lunar New Year
B. Presentations

1. WestCAT Presentation

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and noncontroversial. These items will be enacted by one motion and without discussion. If, however, any interested party or Council member(s) wishes to comment on an item, they may do so before action is taken on the Consent Calendar. Following comments, if a Council member wishes to discuss an item, it will be removed from the Consent Calendar and taken up in order after adoption of the Consent Calendar.

A. Approve the Minutes of the December 20, 2022 meeting.

B. Receive the December 17, 2022 – January 17, 2023 – List of Warrants in the Amount of $889,198.62 and the December 23, 2022 Payroll in the Amount of $582,466.02 and the January 6, 2023 Payroll in the Amount of $641,289.79.

C. Resolution Continuing Authorized Remote Teleconference Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 [Action: Adopt Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Casher)] D. Report on the Impact of Governor Newsom’s February 28, 2023 End to the California State of Emergency Related to Covid-19 [Action: Receive Report (Casher)]
E. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 (ROPS 23-24) for the Successor Agency in the Amount of $4,743,203 [Action: Adopt Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Guillory)]
F. Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pinole Adding Chapter 2.64 “Criminal Background Checks” to the Municipal Code Relating to Access to State and Federal Level Summary Criminal History Information [Action: Waive 2nd Reading and Adopt Ordinance per Staff Recommendation (Casher)]
G. Second Reading of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 2.62 “Code of Ethics and Conduct” to the Pinole Municipal Code [Action: Waive 2nd Reading and Adopt Ordinance per Staff Recommendation (Casher)]
4 of 1216
373
City Council
Agenda – January 17, 2023

H. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Agreements for Building Permit Plan Check Services and On-Call Building and Code Enforcement Staff Augmentation with 4leaf Inc., Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., SHUMS Coda Associates and TRB And Associates, Inc and Authorizes a Total of $800,000 from Planning and Building Fund to Support Professional Building and Code Enforcement Services over a Four-Year Period [Action: Adopt Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Whalen)]
I. Award a Contract to West Valley Construction Company, Inc. to Provide Engineering Design Services for Pinon-Phase 1 Sanitary Sewer Project (CIP Project #Ss2201) [Action: Adopt Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Mishra)]

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Citizens wishing to speak regarding a Public Hearing item should fill out a speaker card prior to the completion of the presentation, by first providing a speaker card to the City Clerk. An official who engaged in an ex parte communication that is the subject of a Public Hearing must disclose the communication on the record prior to the start of the Public Hearing.

A. Adoption Of The 2023-2031 Housing Element and Approval of a Notice of Exemption Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) [Action: Adopt Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Whalen)]

11. OLD BUSINESS
None

12. NEW BUSINESS
A. Council Meeting Format [Action: Discuss and Provide Direction by Minute Order (Bell)]
B. Receive And Accept the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the Fiscal Year (FY) Ended June 30, 2022 [Action: Receive Report (Guillory)]

13. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (Continued from Item 6) (Public Comments) Open only to members of the public who did not speak under the first Citizens to Be Heard, Agenda Item 6
Citizens may speak under any item not listed on the Agenda. The time limit is 3 minutes for City Council items and is subject to modification by the Mayor. Individuals may not share or offer time to another speaker. Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future meeting.

14. ADJOURNMENT to the Regular City Council Meeting of February 7, 2023 in Remembrance of Amber Swartz.

I hereby certify under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing Agenda was posted on the bulletin board at the main entrance of Pinole City Hall, 2131 Pear Street Pinole, CA, and on the City’s website, not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting date set forth on this agenda.
5 of 1216
374
City Council
Agenda – January 17, 2023

________________________
Heather Bell, CMC
City Clerk
POSTED: January 13, 2023 at 11:00A.M.
6 of 1216
375

CITY COUNCIL
REPORT
9H
DATE: JANUARY 17, 2023
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: LILLY WHALEN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE AGREEMENTS FOR BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK

SERVICES AND ON-CALL BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
STAFF AUGMENTATION WITH 4LEAF INC., INTERWEST
CONSULTING GROUP, INC., SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES AND TRB
AND ASSOCIATES, INC AND AUTHORIZES A TOTAL OF $800,000

FROM PLANNING AND BUILDING FUND TO SUPPORT

PROFESSIONAL BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES

OVER A FOUR-YEAR PERIOD

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution (Attachment A) that:
1- Authorizes the City Manager to execute four-year on-call Consultant Services Agreements for Building Permit plan check services in an amount not to exceed $400,000 per firm and on-call Building and Code Enforcement staff augmentation services on a task order basis to 4Leaf Inc., Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. (Interwest), Shums Coda Associates (SCA) and TRB and Associates, Inc.; and 2- Authorizes $800,000 from the Planning and Building fund to support professional Building and Code Enforcement services over a four-year period (January 2023- January 2027)

BACKGROUND
The Community Development Department relies on professional services from the private sector to assist in the delivery of projects and services. The services required in the Building and Code Enforcement Divisions include routine plan check (review of building, plumbing, electrical, and mechanical permits/plans for commercial and residential construction or reconstruction projects consistent with the California Building Codes), and as-needed inspection and administrative support (i.e., building inspectors, permit technicians, code enforcement officers and hearing officers).

The use of third-party plan review and on-call consultant services has been a longstanding practice of the City, given the unpredictable timing and varying nature of the 79 of 1216
376
City Council Report
January 17, 2023 2
projects/work. Currently the need continues to have on-call consultant services readily available to aid in project delivery, minimize response time, create staff efficiencies and enhance customer service. With the exception of the contract with the City’s current plan check firm, which was extended to provide service during the contracting period, most of the current on-call service contracts for the Building and Code Enforcement Divisions expired in November 2022.

On September 30, 2022 staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for plan check and on-call staffing services to complement and support the Building Division1. The RFP was posted to the City’s website, emailed directly to consulting firms and posted to Public Purchase.

DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The City received nine proposals in response to the RFP. An Evaluation Committee composed of the Community Development Director, Finance Director, Public Works Director and Assistant to the City Manager was convened to review and rate the proposals based on the criteria in the RFP. Following that review, seven firms were invited to interview with the Community Development Director. Following interviews, the Community Development Director has identified the following four consulting firms as the most qualified to provide services as requested in the RFP:
• 4Leaf Inc. (proposal in Attachment A - Exhibit B)
• Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. (proposal in Attachment A - Exhibit C) • Shums Coda Associates (proposal in Attachment A - Exhibit D) • TRB and Associates, Inc. (proposal in Attachment A - Exhibit E) Each firm will serve as a team of consultants from which the City may select from to provide building inspection services. The City has sole discretion and decision-making power in its assignment of building support services, including plan check firm review(s) and inspections. In efforts to maintain an appearance of propriety and in avoidance of any conflict of interest, consultants may not be selected to provide inspections services for any project on which it provided plan firm reviews. The City will select and assign services based upon several factors, including but not limited to, the size of the project, the current volume of work assigned to a consultant, and the nature of the project.

The City’s standard Consulting Agreement (Attachment A – Exhibit A) will be utilized for each contract, with the following additional provision applicable to each firm related to the City’s authority and discretion in the assignment of services:
1 Located online: https://cdn5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10946972/File/City%20Government/Building/RFPs/RFP% 20-%20Building%20Services%20-%20Pinole%20Sept%2030-2022.pdf 80 of 1216
377
City Council Report
January 17, 2023 3
Consultant acknowledges and agrees that it is not entitled to deliver any specific amount of materials or services or any materials or services at all under this Agreement and acknowledges and agrees that the Scope of Services will be requested by the City on an as needed basis and at the sole discretion of the City. City does not agree to use Consultant exclusively, nor does the City agree to offer any minimum amount of work to Consultant. Consultant shall provide only Services specifically requested by the City and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

The City continues to negotiate the terms of the consulting agreement with Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. related to the firm’s indemnity obligations, by and through the City Attorney’s Office in substantially the same form as the City’s standard Consulting Agreement.

Scope of Services
This scope of services will enable the City of Pinole to obtain professional and technical assistance on a regular basis (plan check) and on short notice on an on-call, as-needed basis (staffing services) from the selected consultants.

Plan Check Services. Each firm is able to perform independent plan check services of Building Permit applications on a routine basis. Rates for routine plan check services have been negotiated to be standardized as much as possible, and are all a percentage of the plan check fee paid by the applicant. Plan check services are completely cost-recoverable to the City. Each firm will charge a maximum of 65% of the required plan check fee paid by the applicant; depending on the type of project, this fee may be less. There are some differences in hourly rates for projects that exceed three rounds of review. Included in the fee, all firms will hold a pre-application coordination meeting with large development projects and have committed to meeting with the applicant and staff if a plan check is approaching three or more rounds of review. It will be at the City’s sole discretion to determine how plan check will be assigned to each contracted firm.

Professional Staffing Services. The City of Pinole’s Building Division is staffed by one full time Building Official, one full time Building Inspector and two full time Permit Technicians. The City’s Code Enforcement Division is staff by one full time Code Enforcement Officer. Periodically, the City receives major applications for development projects in which there might not be sufficient Building Division staff to conduct the volume of inspections required, or specialized certifications are required (e.g., Certified Access Specialist, or CASp). To maintain a consistent level of service and ensure the safety of the residents and the community the City recognizes the need for third party assistance in performing services on an as-needed basis, when the level of development in the City increases and/or when major development occurs. Each firm will be able to provide the City of Pinole with professional and technical assistance on short notice on a regular or as-needed basis for the services listed below.
• Building Field Inspection Services. The Building Inspector’s primary role is to perform construction inspections, supported by the Building Official, to enforce provisions of the City’s building regulations and the code requirements set forth on 81 of 1216
378
City Council Report
January 17, 2023 4
the approved plans for which a permit was issued. However, during periods of high inspection activity, through the construction of a major development project, and/or during in-house staff vacations/absences/recruitments, it is critical to have on-call contract building field inspection services. Building Permit fees are structured to pay for inspection services —in general, when permit volume is high fees have been paid to account for increased need for inspection service. • Permit Counter Services. The Permit Technician’s role is to assist customers at the Permit Counter, including but not limited to plan intake, overseeing the counter permit issuance, and assistance with questions on building and planning code requirements. However, during periods of high permitting activity and/or during inhouse staff vacations/absences/recruitments, it is critical to have on-call contract permit counter services. Building Permit fees are structured to pay for permit intake and issuance services—in general, when permit volume is high fees have been paid to account for increased need for counter/processing service. • Code Enforcement Services. The Code Enforcement Officer’s role is to provide education to the public, issue notices, perform field inspections, issue citations, organize and prepare for appeal and show cause hearings, arrange for abatement warrants, and organize abatement work. However, during in-house staff vacations/absences/recruitments, it is critical to have on-call contract code enforcement services. Furthermore, seasonally, there is need for part time vegetation abatement enforcement. Additionally, on an as-needed basis, there is a need for a Hearing Officer to hear citation appeals and order abatements. Except for work done under an abatement, which is completely cost recoverable, these costs are not typically recoverable in a meaningful way from applicants.

FISCAL IMPACT
Plan Check Services. Trends show that on a fiscal year basis the City spends approximately $77,000 on average on third party plan check services for routine building permit processing. Due to the recently adopted new user and regulator fees effective September 1, 2022, it is anticipated that revenue accounts for both plan check and building permit fees will increase modestly in the current and subsequent fiscal years.

Additionally, the City received one major building permit application for multifamily housing in FY21/22 (accounting for approximately $142,000 in plan check fees), two major building permit applications for multifamily housing projects in FY22/23 (accounting for approximately $180,000 total in plan check fees) and anticipates receiving two additional major building permit applications in FY22/23 and FY23/24 (accounting for an anticipated $340,000 total in plan check fees).

For these reasons, staff anticipates $800,000 in costs for plan check services over the four-year contract term. Through the annual budget review and approval staff will propose a budget amount for plan checking services on a fiscal year basis. Each firm’s agreement will be limited to an amount not to exceed $400,000 over four years to allow flexibility in how staff assigns plan checks to each firm. However, the combination of work performed 82 of 1216
379
City Council Report
January 17, 2023 5
by any or all the firms will not exceed the total authorized contract amount of $800,000 over the four-year period, unless authorized by the Council. Plan check services are completely cost-recoverable to the City.

Professional Staffing Services. When professional services are required, a task order will be authorized outlining the scope and the amount of the service. Through the annual budget review and approval staff will propose a budget amount for professional staffing services on a fiscal year basis.

As indicated in this report, Building Permit fees are structured to pay for inspection and counter intake/processing services. Except for work done under an abatement, Code Enforcement fees are not typically recoverable in a meaningful way from applicants.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution
Exhibit A - Consultant Services Agreements
Exhibit B - Proposal from 4Leaf Inc., dated October 25, 2022 Exhibit C - Proposal from Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., dated October 25, 2022 Exhibit D - Proposal from Shums Coda Associates, dated October 25, 2022 Exhibit E - Proposal from TRB and Associates, Inc, dated October 25, 2022 83 of 1216
380
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINOLE AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD AND EXECUTE A FOUR-YEAR PROFESSIONAL

SERVICE CONTRACTS FOR BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK SERVICES AND ON

CALL BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT STAFF AUGUMENTATION WITH 4LEAF INC., INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC., SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES AND TRB AND ASSOCIATES, INC. EACH IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $400,000 AND IN THE TOTAL AGGREGATED AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $800,000 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department relies on professional services from the private sector to assist in the delivery of projects and services; and WHEREAS, the services required in the Building and Code Enforcement Divisions include routine plan check (review of building, plumbing, electrical, and mechanical permits/plans for commercial and residential construction or reconstruction projects consistent with the California Building Codes), and as-needed inspection and administrative support (i.e., building inspectors, permit technicians, code enforcement officers and hearing officers); and
WHEREAS, code enforcement services and building plan check, inspection and coordination services are essential City functions; and WHEREAS, on September 30, 2022 Staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for plan check and on-call staffing services to complement and support the Building Division; and
WHEREAS, nine proposals were received, reviewed and analyzed based on the criteria in the RFP and interviews with the top seven firms; and WHEREAS, 4Leaf Inc., Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., Shums Coda Associates and TRB and Associates, Inc. were the lowest cost bidders, the most responsive and the most qualified to provide services as requested in the RFP in order to enhance customer service, deliver quality products and create staff efficiencies; and WHEREAS, each firm will serve as a team of consultants from which staff may select from on an as-needed basis to provide plan check and on-call staffing services to complement and support the Building Division; and
WHEREAS, the total anticipated cost for third-party plan check services for routine building permit processing is $800,000 over the four-year contract term.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the above recitals are true and correct and made part of this resolution.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pinole approves and authorizes the City Manager to execute a four-year on call professional service

ATTACHMENT A
84 of 1216
381
contracts for routine plan check services and on call staff augmentation services with 4Leaf Inc., Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., Shums Coda Associates and TRB and Associates, Inc. each in an amount not to exceed $400,000 , and a total aggregated amount not to exceed $800,000, in a form approved by the City Attorney, and attached hereto as Exhibit A upon the associated scopes of work and rates as follows:

Exhibit B 4Leaf Inc. scope of work and rates
Exhibit C Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. scope of work and rates Exhibit D Shums Coda Associates scope of work and rates Exhibit E TBR and Associates, Inc. scope of work and rates BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the Agreement with Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. substantially in the form presented in Exhibit A with minor revisions as shall be approved by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pinole held on the 17th day of January, 2023 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

I, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was regularly introduced, passed, and adopted on the 17th day of January, 2023
____________________________________
Heather Bell, CMC
City Clerk
85 of 1216
382

May 6, 2025
Finance Department
DATE: May 6, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Andrea Miller, Director of Finance
Mubeen Qader, Deputy Director of Finance
Ofelia Alvarez, Senior Buyer
Subject: Update on the Sanctuary City Contracting and
Investment Policy Ordinance
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to receive the update.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

On June 5, 2018, the City Council adopted a Sanctuary
City Contracting and Investment Policy Ordinance No.
12-18 N.S.), which mandates that City staff provide a
written update to the City Council. The ordinance allows exceptions when the City Council determines that no
reasonable alternative exists, considering the availability of alternatives, the intent of the ordinance, and the
quantifiable additional costs. To remain operable, and in compliance with interagency agreements, both the Fire
Department and Police Department will need to continue
to procure Motorola brand equipment.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECEIVE a written update regarding the steps taken to ensure compliance with the Sanctuary City Contracting
and Investment Policy Ordinance; and ADOPT a
resolution waiving requirements of Ordinance No. 12-18
as applied to Motorola Solutions, as no reasonable
alternative exists – Finance Department (Andrea Miller/ Mubeen Qader/ Ofelia Alvarez 510-620-6699).

AGENDA
REPORT
383

May 6, 2025
DISCUSSION:

As a Sanctuary City, the City of Richmond is committed to protecting all residents of our community. The goal of the adopted ordinance is to prohibit the City from contracting with any person or entity that provides the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) with any “Data Broker”, “Extreme Vetting” services unless the City Council makes a specific determination that no reasonable alternative exists. The ordinance also prohibits the City from investing in any of these companies and requires the City to include notice of these prohibitions in any Request for Proposals (RFPs), Requests for Qualifications (RFQs), and any construction or other contracting bids. The ordinance also requires that the City provide an annual report to the City Council on its enforcement.

The Finance Department works with all the City departments on this project. All departments have reviewed the "Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Policy Ordinance" (Attachment 1). Departments have also completed the Departmental Sanctuary City Compliance Statement (Attachment 2). Any findings or requests for waivers were noted in the Departmental Sanctuary City Compliance Statement.

In addition, all Public Works construction bids, RFQs, RFPs, or any other solicitation issued by the City shall include the statement below:

SANCTUARY CITY CONTRACTING ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of the Richmond Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance (SCCO, Ordinance No. 12-18). Contractor must submit the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement included herein along with the bid or proposal prior to execution of the contract.

Furthermore, the City Attorney’s office requires all contracts to have the statement below and complete the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement (Attachment 3):

SANCTUARY CITY CONTRACTING ORDINANCE (SCCO)
The Richmond Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance No. 12-18 prohibits the City from granting and or retaining contracts with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”).

Impacted Contracts
The contracting portion of this ordinance impacts a contract with the Fire Department and the Police Department. The Fire Department and Police Department use Motorola 384

May 6, 2025
brand portable and mobile radios. Radio communication is critical to providing emergency response services to the City of Richmond.

The City of Richmond is a member agency of East Bay Regional Communications System Authority (EBRCSA). EBRCSA is a communications system manufactured by Motorola, providing interoperability for emergency responders and others on the system in Alameda and Contra Costa counties. EBRCS entered into agreement with Motorola in 2009 following an RFP conducted by Contra Costa County (#0904-018), and the agreement is currently in effect until July 30, 2026.

Red Cloud Inc. is Motorola's exclusive Manufacturer's Representative for all cities within Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, and Marin Counties, as well as the City and County of San Francisco.

To remain operable, both the Fire Department and Police Department will need to continue to procure Motorola brand equipment, such as radios, batteries, related equipment, and software updates. Depending on the lowest available pricing, sometimes this may require procuring directly with Motorola, or Red Cloud, as their authorized representative for this region. As such, a waiver from Ordinance No. 12-18 restrictions is necessary.

Prohibition on Investment
Implementation of the investment portion of the ordinance includes monitoring of the City’s investments on a regular basis. The City of Richmond does not have any investments in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any provider of Data Broker or Extreme Vetting Services to ICE. The investment policy was revised to include the following restriction:

In accordance with the Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Policy Ordinance 12-18 N.S. Section 4 Prohibition on Investments, effective June 5, 2018, the City shall not make any investments in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any provider of Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The ordinance also requires the City to adopt a plan with respect to pension fund investments to avoid investments in such entities. City employees are part of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). The City contacted CalPERS and encouraged them to avoid investing in such funds per the City ordinance and investment policy.

COMPLIANCE
Finance staff continue to work with all departments to ensure that all contracts comply with the ordinance. Finance staff also monitor the City’s investments on a monthly basis to confirm that these conform to the ordinance. During the 2024 calendar year, one contract, the Motorola contract, was impacted by this ordinance. As noted above, 385

May 6, 2025
terminating the contract with Motorola would have a significant public safety and financial impact on the City.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 - Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Policy Ordinance
Attachment 2 – Departmental Sanctuary City Compliance Statement Attachment 3 – Vendor Sanctuary City Compliance Statement Attachment 4 – Resolution Waiving Ordinance No. 12-18 Requirements as applied to Motorola
386
ORDINANCE NO. 12-18 N.S
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMON:P, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING A SANCTUARY CITY CONTRACTING AND INVESTMENT POLICY I The City of Richmond does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Title
This ordinance shall be known as the Sanctuary City Contracting and Invest11Jlent Ordinance.

SECTION 2. Definitions
1) "City" means the City of Richmond, California.
2) "Data Broker" (also commonly called information broker, information reseller, data aggregator, and information solution provider) means either of the following:
a) The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector businesses and government agencies; b) The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose fro:m that for which it is ultimately used.
3) "Extreme Vetting" means data-mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar service.
4) "ICE" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and any subdivision thereof.
5) "Person or Entity" means any private natural person, corporation, institution, subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of such person; the parent entities that have operating control over such person, and the subsidiaries, affiliates and divisions under operating control of such parent entity. Government entities, officers and employees are expressly excluded from this definition.

SECTION 3. Prohibition on Use of City Resources
1) No officer, employee, department, board, commission, City Council, Cit;y Manager, or other entity of the City shall enter into a new, amended, or extended contract or l;lgreement with, any Person or Entity that provides ICE with any "Data Broker" or "Extreme Vetting" services, as defined herein, unless the City Council makes a specific determination that no reasonable alternative exists, talcing into consideration the following:
a) The intent and purpose of this ordinance;
b) The availability of alternative services, goods and equipment; and c) Quantifiable additional costs resulting from use of available alternatives. 2) All public works, construction bids, requests for information, requests for proposals, or any other solicitation issued by the City shall include notice of the prohibition listed above. 3) For the purpose of determining which Person or Entity provides ICE with Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services, the City Manager shall rely on:
a) Information published by reliable sources;
b) Information released by public agencies;
Ord.No.12-18 N.S.

387
c) A declaration under the penalty of perjury executed by the Person or Entity, affirming that they do not provide Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE; and d) Information submitted to the City Manager by any member of the public, and thereafter duly verified.
4) Any Person or Entity identified as a supplier of Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE and potentially affected by this section shall be notified by the City Manager of the determination. Any such Person or Entity shall be entitled to a review of the determination by appeal to the City Manager.

Request for such review shall be made within thirty (30) days of notification, or seven (7) days of the date of a City solicitation or notice of a pending contract or purchase, of interest to the Person or Entity seeking review. Any Person or Entity vendor so identified may appeal the City Manager's determination to the City Council, within fifteen (15) 4ays of the determination.

SECTION 4. Prohibition on Investment
1) The City of Richmond shall not malce any investment in stocks, bonds~ securities, or other obligations issued by any provider of Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE. 2) The City Council shall adopt a plan with respect to pension fund investments and shall implement such a plan consistent with the intent of this act.

SECTION 5. Investigation And Reporting
1) The City Manager, or his or her designee, shall review compliance with Sections 3-4. The City Manager may initiate and shall receive and investigate all complaints regarding violations of Sections 3- 4. After investigating such complaints, the City Manager shall issue findings regarding any alleged violation. If the City Manager finds that a violation occurred, the City Manager shall, within 30 days of such finding, send a report of such finding to the City Council, the Mayor, and the head of any department involved in the violation or in which the violation occurred. All officers, employees, departments, boards, commissions, and other entities of the City shall cooperate with the City Manager in any investigation of a violation of Sections 3-4. 2) The City Manager shall coordinate with the City Attorney's office to remedy any such violations, and the City Attorney is authorized to use all legal measures available to rescind, terminate, or void contracts awarded in violation of this ordinance. 3) By April 1 of each year, each City department shall certify its compliance with this ordinance by written notice to the City Manager.
4) By May 1 of each year, the City Manager shall schedule and submit to the City Council a written, public report regarding the department's compliance with Sections 3-4 over the previous calendar year. At minimum, this report must (1) detail with specificity the steps the department has taken to ensure compliance with Sections 3-4, (2) disclose any issues with compliance, including any violations or potential violations of this Ordinance, and (3) detail actions taken to cure any deficiencies with compliance.

SECTION 6. Enforcement
1) Cause of Action. Any violation of this Ordinance constitutes an injury, and any person may institute proceedings for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce this Ordinance.
2) Attorney's Fees and Costs. A court may award a plaintiff who prevails on a cause of action under subsection (a) reasonable attorney's fees and costs. 3) Any Person or Entity knowingly or willingly supplying false information in violation of Section 3 (3)(c), may be guilty of a misdemeanor and be subject to a fine ofup to $1,000.

Ord.No.12-18 N.S.

Page2 of3
388
SECTION 7. Severability
The provisions in this Ordinance are severable. If any part of provision of this Ordinance, or the application of this Ordinance to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance, including the application of such part or provisions to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected by such holding and shall continue to have force and effect.

SECTION 8. Construction
The provisions of this Ordinance are to be construed broadly to effectuate the purposes of this Ordinance.

SECTION 9. Effective Date
This Ordinance becomes effective thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

First introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 15 , 2018, and finally passed and adopted at a regular meeting held on June 5, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

Approved:

TOM BUTT
Mayor
Approved as to form:

BRUCE GOODMILLER
City Attorney
State of California
County of Contra Costa
City of Richmond
Councilmembers Choi, Martinez, Myrick, Recinos, and Vice Mayor Willis.

Mayor Butt.

None.

Councilmember Beckles.
}
}
: ss.

PAMELA CHRISTIAN

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 12-18 N.S., passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on June 5, 2018. ~½~ Pame a ·1st1an, Jty er o t 1e 1ty o fR 1c I 1111011 d Ord.No .1 2-1 8 N.S.

389

CITY OF RICHMOND
Sanctuary City Compliance Statement
The undersigned, Department Head of the______________________________ Department (hereafter "Department"), has had an opportunity to review the requirements of City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 (hereafter "Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance" or “SCCO”). The Department understands and agrees that the City shall not knowingly enter into a new contract or agreement, nor amend or extend an existing contract or agreement with any Person or Entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Department understands the meaning of the following terms used in the SCCO:
a. "Data Broker” means either of the following:
i. The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector business and government agencies; ii. The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose from that for which it is ultimately used.
b. “Extreme Vetting” means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar services."
Department understands that it shall not knowingly receive or retain a contract if at the time the Contract is executed, or at any time during the term of the Contract, the contractor provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE.

By executing this Statement, Department certifies that it has complied with the requirements of the SCCO during the 20XX Calendar Year. If at any time the Department ceases to comply, Department will promptly notify the City Manager in writing.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day of , 20XX, at , California.

Department Head
Printed Name: Signature:

Name of Department: Date:

Department SCCO Compliance Statement (Augt2020)
390

CITY OF RICHMOND
Sanctuary City Compliance Statement
The undersigned, (hereafter "Contractor"), has had an opportunity to review the requirements of City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 (hereafter "Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance" or “SCCO”). Contractor understands and agrees that the City may choose with whom it will maintain business relations and may refrain from contracting with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor understands the meaning of the following terms used in the SCCO:
a. "Data Broker” means either of the following:
i. The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector business and government agencies; ii. The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose from that for which it is ultimately used.
b. “Extreme Vetting” means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar services."
Contractor understands that it is not eligible to receive or retain a City contract if at the time the Contract is executed, or at any time during the term of the Contract, it provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE.

Contractor further understands and agrees that Contractor'sfailure to comply with the SCCO shall constitute a material default of the Contract and the City Manager may terminate the Contract and bar Contractor from bidding on future contracts with the City for five (5) years from the effective date of the contract termination.

By executing this Statement, Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of the SCCO and that if at any time during the term of the Contract it ceases to comply, Contractor will promptly notify the City Manager in writing. Any person or entity who knowingly or willingly supplies false information in violation of the SCCO shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a $1,000 fine.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Printed Name: Title:

Signed: Date:

Business Entity:

Vendor SCCO Compliance Statement (July2024)
391
Reso. No. XX-21

RESOLUTION NO. XX-XX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA, WAIVING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SANCTUARY CITY CONTRACTING AND INVESTMENT ORDINANCE (ORD. NO. 12-18 N.S.) AS TO

MOTOROLA FOR FUTURE CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES

WHEREAS, the City of Richmond is a Sanctuary City committed to protecting all members of the community, and the Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Policy Ordinance (Ordinance No. 12-18 N.S.) was adopted to prohibit the City from entering into contracts or making investments with persons or entities that provide “Data Broker” or “Extreme Vetting” services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE); and WHEREAS, the Ordinance allows for exceptions when the City Council determines that no reasonable alternative exists, considering the availability of alternatives, the intent of the ordinance, and the quantifiable additional costs; and
WHEREAS, it is determined that Motorola is used broadly by local, state, and federal agencies, including the United States military, and is unable to meet the requirements set forth in Ordinance No. 12-18 N.S.; and
WHEREAS, the Richmond Fire and Police Departments use Motorola-brand mobile and portable radios as part of their core emergency communication infrastructure, which is essential to delivering critical public safety services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond is a member of the East Bay Regional Communications System Authority (EBRCSA), a Motorola-based interoperable communications system serving agencies across Alameda and Contra Costa counties; and
WHEREAS, Motorola equipment and services, including radios, batteries, software updates, and related technology, are critical for ensuring interoperability and functionality within the EBRCSA system, and are not reasonably substitutable due to technical and operational requirements; and
WHEREAS, procurement of this equipment may require purchasing from either Motorola directly or through Red Cloud, Inc., their exclusive authorized representative for the region encompassing Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin Counties, and the City and County of San Francisco; and
WHEREAS, based on departmental compliance reviews and findings documented in the Departmental Sanctuary City Compliance Statement, Finance staff have determined that the continued procurement of Motorola equipment is necessary to maintain public safety and that no reasonable alternative exists; and
WHEREAS, denying the City’s ability to contract with Motorola would have a significant negative impact on emergency response services, interoperability, and public safety; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Richmond hereby finds that Motorola is the only reasonable option for the required equipment and services, and approves a waiver of the requirements of Ordinance No. 12-18 N.S. as they apply to Motorola for all future contracts and purchases; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the waiver shall apply solely for the purposes of acquiring Motorola-branded equipment and services necessary for emergency communications, as determined by the Finance Department in consultation with affected departments and consistent with the Ordinance’s intent to protect community members. 392
Reso. No. XX-21

*********************
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held [enter date], by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. XX-XX, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on [enter date].

Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
393
Reso. No. XX-21

CLERK’S

CERTIFICATE
I, Pamela Christian, City Clerk of the City of Richmond, do hereby certify as follows:

The foregoing resolution is a full, true, and correct copy of Resolution No. XX-XX duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City duly and regularly held at the regular meeting place thereof on the [X day of Month Year], of which meeting all the members of said City Council had due notice and at which a majority thereof were present; and that at said meeting said resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

An agenda of said meeting was posted before said meeting at City Hall, 450 Civic Center Plaza in the City of Richmond, California, a location freely accessible to members of the public, and a brief description of said resolution appeared on said agenda.

I have carefully compared the foregoing with the original on file and of record in my office, and the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of the original resolution adopted at said meeting.

Said resolution has not been amended, modified, or rescinded since the date of its adoption, and the same is now in full force and effect.

Dated: , 2023.

City Clerk of the City of Richmond
[SEAL]
394
May 6, 2025
Finance Department
DATE: May 6, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Andrea Miller, Director of Finance
Mubeen Qader, Deputy Director of Finance
Jerry Gurule, Accounting Manager
Antonio Banuelos, Accounting Manager
Subject: Investment and Cash Balance Report, Monthly Overtime Reports, and Documentary Transfer Tax Report for the
Month of March 2025
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on receiving this report.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

City staff are requesting that the City Council receive the City’s Investment and Cash Balance Report, Monthly
Overtime Reports, and Documentary Transfer Tax
Report for the month of March 2025.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECEIVE the City’s Investment and Cash Balance Report, Monthly Overtime Reports, and Documentary
Transfer Tax Report for the month of March 2025 –
Finance Department (Andrea Miller 510-620-6740).

AGENDA
REPORT
395
May 6, 2025
DISCUSSION:

Investment and Cash Balance Report
It is the policy of the City of Richmond (City) to invest public funds in a manner that prioritizes safety and liquidity over yield while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds. In accordance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the City’s Investment Policy, the Director of Finance shall report monthly on the City's pooled and Bond funds to the City Manager and City Council and shall report quarterly on other investments.

The Investment and Cash Balance Report is a monthly report of the City’s pooled cash balance which includes General Fund, Special Revenue, Debt Service, Capital Projects, Enterprise, Internal service, Trust & Agency, Redevelopment/Successor Agency, and any other Funds investment activities under the direction of the City (Attachment 1).

The Portfolio Management Report represents the monthly bank balances, along with market balances of permitted investments according to the City’s Investment Policy.

Investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), CalTrust, money market, agency bonds, certificates of deposits, and corporate notes are all allowable by California Government Code Section 53601 and permitted according to the City of Richmond’s Investment Policy updated December 3, 2024.

This investment report reflects the additional restrictions the City Council added to the City of Richmond’s Investment Policy at their April 30, 2024, special meeting. Staff presented Investment Policy modifications and recommendations for socially responsible investments to Council for consideration based on the policy direction to eliminate the investment of City funds in industries that facilitate violence, war, oppression, and apartheid. Recommendations were presented and adopted by the Council on December 3, 2024 (Resolution #145-24) with the request for periodic updates. Staff have provided an update to Council on April 15, 2025.

At the September 2024 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, the Federal Reserve (Fed) lowered interest rates by 50 basis points, easing monetary policy for the first time in four years. This lowers the interest rate target to a range of 4.75 percent to 5 percent on investments. In November 2024, as a follow-up to September’s big halfpercentage point reduction, the FOMC lowered its benchmark overnight borrowing rate by a quarter percentage point, or 25 basis points, to a target range of 4.50 percent -

4.75 percent. At the December 2024 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, the Federal Reserve (Fed) lowered interest rates by 25 basis points. This lowers the target interest rate range to 4.25 percent - 4.5 percent and reflects the Fed’s ongoing commitment to achieving its dual goals of maximum employment and price stability. The City has started to see a slight decrease in our rate of return due to these recent rate cuts.
396
May 6, 2025
The City is allowed to pre-fund the City’s future Pension and Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) costs in accordance with the OPEB policies. These funds are invested according to the policies funding objectives, and funding guidelines. The City maintains a Section 115 Combination Trust for City-OPEB & Pension administered by Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS), and a California Employers’ Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT), administered by California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) for RPOA-OPEB. Each Trust is comprised of a diversified portfolio of investments consistent with the Trust’s objectives and liquidity requirements.

Overtime Reports
The overtime reports for the month of March 2025 provides a comparative summary of budgeted overtime to actual overtime usage by department for miscellaneous and sworn staff. Year-over-year and month-over-month totals are included for sworn staff (Attachments 2 and 3).

Documentary Transfer Tax
On June 24, 2024, City Council requested monthly updates of the Transfer Tax received by the City of Richmond from Contra Costa County for the sale of properties in Richmond. As this is the most volatile revenue stream for the City, the amounts received month-to-month can vary from as low as $300,000 to upwards of $3 million – a few large sales can widely swing the revenues.

In April 2025, the City received the documentary transfer tax data report from the County, which identified that the tax revenue for March 2025 would total $486,189.50 (Attachment 4).

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Investment and Cash Balance Report for March 2025 Attachment 2 – Overtime Report for March 2025
Attachment 3 – Overtime Public Safety Report for March 2025 Attachment 4 – Documentary Transfer Tax Report for March 2025 397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
Overtime Report for March 2025 (Attachment 2)
PERIOD 9, MARCH 2025
75% Threshold

ORIGINAL

BUDGET TRANSFERS REVISED BUDGET
YTD

EXPENDED

AVAILABLE

BUDGET PCT
GENERAL FUND (summary)
400031 OVERTIME/General 1,903,320 57,351 1,960,671 1,571,189 389,482 80% 400032 OVERTIME/Sworn 11,190,934 - 11,190,934 8,739,300 2,451,634 78% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 13,094,254 57,351 13,151,605 10,310,489 2,841,116 78% Overtime By Department

CITY CLERK
Administration 25,000 - 25,000 17,870 7,130 71%

CITY ATTORNEY
Administration - 500 500 358 142 72%

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
General Plan Code Enforcement - 20,000 20,000 3,345 16,655 17%

FINANCE
Payroll 30,000 - 30,000 12,051 17,949 40%
Treasury/Cash Management - - - 434 (434) 100%
Accounts Payable - - - 1,232 (1,232) 100%
Revenue Collection 5,000 - 5,000 6,486 (1,486) 130%
TOTAL FINANCE 35,000 - 35,000 20,202 14,798 58%

HUMAN RESOURCES
Administration - - - 398 (398) 100%
POLICE
Administration 490,227 - 490,227 434,910 55,317 89%
CAD Dispatch System 751,511 - 751,511 758,870 (7,359) 101% RM System 4,000 - 4,000 6,636 (2,636) 166%
Parking Enforcement 4,000 - 4,000 8,438 (4,438) 211%
Sworn Administration 6,708,965 - 6,708,965 5,212,713 1,496,252 78% TOTAL POLICE 7,958,703 - 7,958,703 6,421,567 1,537,136 81%

408
Overtime Report for March 2025 (Attachment 2)
75% Threshold

ORIGINAL

BUDGET TRANSFERS REVISED
BUDGET
YTD

EXPENDED

AVAILABLE

BUDGET PCT
FIRE
Administration 2,000 - 2,000 2,010 (10) 101%
Suppression - - - 2,271 (2,271) 100%
Sworn Suppression 4,452,872 - 4,452,872 3,500,060 952,812 79% Sworn Prevention 29,097 - 29,097 25,134 3,963 86%
Sworn Training - - - 1,393 (1,393) 100%
TOTAL FIRE 4,483,969 - 4,483,969 3,530,868 953,101 79%

OFFICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY
Administration 40,000 - 40,000 1,806 38,194 5%

PUBLIC WORKS & ENGINEERING SVCS
Stationary Engineers 12,000 - 12,000 8,545 3,455 71%
Building Services 5,000 5,000 10,000 7,166 2,834 72%
Utility Sections 132,000 (4,000) 128,000 60,520 67,480 47% Electric 25,000 - 25,000 23,102 1,898 92%
Parks & Landscape Admin 200,000 - 200,000 89,530 110,470 45% Streets Administration 36,000 (34,000) 2,000 - 2,000 0% Street Sweeping 1,100 5,000 6,100 436 5,664 7%
Pavement Maintenance 41,447 15,000 56,447 33,379 23,068 59% Traffic Signs & Lines 4,885 14,000 18,885 16,635 2,250 88% Equipment Services 20,000 - 20,000 8,817 11,183 44%
Abatement Services 50,000 - 50,000 31,810 18,190 64%
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 527,432 1,000 528,432 279,941 248,491 53%

LIBRARY
Library Administration 7,000 18,000 25,000 13,576 11,424 54%

COMMUNITY SERVICES
Recreation Services/Cities of Service - 343 343 343 - 100% Recreation Administration 400 356 756 756 - 100%
Booker T Center 100 - 100 107 (7) 107%
Nevin Center 1,800 - 1,800 741 1,059 41%
Shields Reid 200 - 200 - 200 0%
Recreation Complex 1,000 1,061 2,061 2,061 - 100%

409
Overtime Report for March 2025 (Attachment 2)
75% Threshold

ORIGINAL

BUDGET TRANSFERS REVISED
BUDGET
YTD

EXPENDED

AVAILABLE

BUDGET PCT
Parchester Center 700 219 919 919 - 100%
May Valley Center 700 361 1,061 1,061 - 100%
Recreation DPRC 750 - 750 1,172 (422) 156%
Senior Center 200 - 200 14 186 7%
Senior Center Annex 300 - 300 224 76 75%
Aquatics 5,000 - 5,000 3,067 1,933 61%
Convention Center 1,500 5,512 7,012 8,407 (1,395) 120%
Plunge 3,500 - 3,500 1,425 2,075 41%
TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 16,150 7,851 24,001 20,296 3,705 85%

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Administration 1,000 - 1,000 - 1,000 0%
Public Art - 10,000 10,000 260 9,740 3%
TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1,000 10,000 11,000 260 10,740 2% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 13,094,254 57,351 13,151,605 10,310,489 2,841,116 78%

NON-GENERAL FUND
Overtime By Fund
1012 HILLTOP LANDSCAPE MAINT DIST 20,000 - 20,000 1,424 18,576 7% 1015 MARINA BAY LNDSCP & LIGHT DIST 25,300 - 25,300 8,463 16,837 33% 1018 RENT PROGRAM 2,500 - 2,500 2,038 462 82%
1050 CR-PLANNING & BUILDING - BUILDING 9,500 - 9,500 2,102 7,398 22% 1050 CR-PLANNING & BUILDING - PLANNING 15,000 - 15,000 6,086 8,914 41% 1055 ENCROACHMENT SVCS 25,000 - 25,000 32,361 (7,361) 129% 1303 KIDS FIRST INITIATIVE - 5,000 5,000 1,285 3,715 26% 4001 PORT OF RICHMOND - 100 100 100 - 100%
4003 WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION - 25,000 25,000 14,671 10,329 59%

410
Overtime Report for March 2025 (Attachment 2)
75% Threshold

ORIGINAL

BUDGET TRANSFERS REVISED
BUDGET
YTD

EXPENDED

AVAILABLE

BUDGET PCT
4003 WASTEWATER PRE-TREATMENT 7,500 40,000 47,500 37,998 9,502 80% 4006 STORMWATER - 5,100 5,100 4,222 878 83%
-
4405 RHA-NYSTROM VILLAGE 11,000 - 11,000 7,269 3,731 66% 5001 INSURANCE RESERVES - - - 87 100%
TOTAL NON-GENERAL FUNDS 115,800 75,200 191,000 118,019 72,981 62%

411
Overtime Public Safety Report for March 2025 (Attachment 3) City of Richmond
Public Safety Sworn Overtime
Fund: 0001 - General Fund
Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Average
Month July August September October November December January February March April May June YTD YTD Remaining Monthly Target % 8% 17% 25% 33% 42% 50% 58% 67% 75% 83% 92% 100% Total $ Total % Budget Expense

ORIGINAL
BUDGET

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2017-18 Overtime - Sworn 3,169,000 3,169,000 569,194 440,670 445,282 459,402 452,278 396,762 322,524 497,979 455,202 554,449 509,368 466,567 5,569,677 175.8% (2,400,677) 464,139.77 FY2018-19 Overtime - Sworn 3,433,019 3,433,019 482,143 537,369 655,866 437,794 524,577 430,398 367,322 512,595 422,587 497,767 536,209 505,966 5,910,592 172.2% (2,477,573) 492,549.37 FY2019-20 Overtime - Sworn 5,000,000 4,800,000 473,963 469,392 491,205 509,931 449,751 473,935 390,897 498,501 501,383 479,696 560,031 439,159 5,737,844 119.5% (937,844) 478,153.64 FY2020-21 Overtime - Sworn 2,497,290 3,533,043 275,202 246,822 296,775 382,618 306,787 278,293 205,529 303,631 307,092 357,284 323,537 368,366 3,651,935 103.4% (118,892) 304,327.96 FY2021-22 Overtime - Sworn 5,165,434 5,165,434 379,016 408,253 487,481 423,830 333,006 307,152 255,420 330,788 314,524 336,044 304,989 366,419 4,246,922 82.2% 918,512 353,910.14 POLICE
FY2022-23 Overtime - Sworn 5,165,435 4,800,000 373,491 355,649 399,628 355,866 377,889 401,964 396,783 474,403 463,499 416,775 496,542 449,394 4,961,883 103.4% (161,883) 413,490.26 FY2023-24 Overtime - Sworn 4,800,000 6,708,965 487,105 925,716 477,693 462,417 470,347 531,204 424,452 626,680 478,293 593,735 568,535 588,097 6,634,274 98.9% 74,691 552,856.16 FY2024-25 Overtime - Sworn 6,708,965 6,708,965 560,788 543,814 584,028 590,943 580,286 631,961 492,367 662,199 566,326 5,212,713 77.7% 1,496,252 579,190.32 FY2017-18 Overtime - Sworn 2,486,914 2,486,914 268,465 345,174 291,221 359,542 367,182 310,508 336,315 176,449 132,298 196,306 203,912 166,108 3,153,480 126.8% (666,566) 262,789.99 FY2018-19 Overtime - Sworn 2,509,914 2,509,914 257,785 245,946 179,272 171,370 219,937 204,997 261,780 216,596 196,343 310,702 220,368 275,166 2,760,261 110.0% (250,347) 230,021.77 FY2019-20 Overtime - Sworn 4,305,402 2,509,914 295,166 277,886 286,016 300,083 332,654 382,084 347,492 328,467 350,709 302,505 264,571 325,335 3,792,969 151.1% (1,283,055) 316,080.74 FY2020-21 Overtime - Sworn 1,993,165 3,193,165 398,678 380,282 417,982 393,922 267,819 345,928 341,403 305,081 172,961 261,923 263,518 286,039 3,835,537 120.1% (642,372) 319,628.09 FY2021-22 Overtime - Sworn 3,629,097 4,334,499 334,236 434,974 358,578 358,251 352,789 327,832 448,493 410,429 297,215 355,475 725,409 438,807 4,842,489 111.7% (507,990) 403,540.77 FIRE
FY2022-23 Overtime - Sworn 4,334,499 4,334,499 444,959 444,457 414,638 401,115 402,116 379,882 443,531 475,560 339,814 398,079 369,477 435,057 4,948,685 114.2% (614,186) 412,390.41 FY2023-24 Overtime - Sworn 4,482,969 5,135,869 524,969 473,094 348,296 346,854 363,759 315,266 363,100 382,930 381,442 417,762 431,523 357,820 4,706,814 91.6% 429,055 392,234.47 FY2024-25 Overtime - Sworn 4,481,969 4,481,969 367,801 375,737 425,984 419,101 462,309 358,764 366,579 356,872 393,439 3,526,587 78.7% 955,382 391,843.01 FY2024-25 TOTAL 11,190,934 11,190,934 928,589 919,552 1,010,013 1,010,045 1,042,595 990,725 858,946 1,019,071 959,765 - - - 8,739,300 78.1% 2,451,634 971,033.32

BUDGET ACTUALS TOTAL

412
Documentary Transfer Tax
The City of Richmond receives Documentary Transfer Tax from the County for the sale of properties in Richmond. As one of the most volatile revenue streams for the City, the amounts received can vary month-to-month from the low $300 thousand to the highs of $3 million. A few large sales can widely swing the revenues.

In FY2023-24, the City budgeted $13.3 million for the Transfer Tax category and received $8.6 million, equating to a difference of $4.7 million.

For FY2024-25, the City has budgeted $7.4 million. The difference between the budgeted amounts in these two years is that in the current budget, staff did not include property sales of over $10 million. These few and unpredictable transactions skew the monthly sales amounts. Removing these transactions from the calculation yields more predictable and obtainable amounts to be used for budgeting.

As a reminder, Measure H, approved by Richmond voters in November 2018, went into effect at the end of December 2018. Measure H increased the real estate transfer tax from 0.7 percent to 1.25 percent for properties with a sale price of over $1 million but below $3 million, 2.5 percent for properties with a sale price between $3 - $10 million, and

3.0 percent for properties with a sale price over $10 million.

The table below shows each monthly payment going back to FY2018-19 and highlights the volatility of this revenue stream. Of note are the very high payments received in certain months which are shown as significant peaks.

Attachment 4 - Documentary Transfer Tax for March 2025 Page 1 of 3 413
Report Date & Time
04/03/2025 16:11
Action City Split
$15,000.00
$5,600.00
$3,395.00
$13,912.50
$1,379.00
$2,800.00
$6,055.00
$5,166.00
$4,655.00
$4,697.00
$3,619.00
$6,013.00
$2,800.00
$875.00
$6,972.00
$13,750.00
$896.00
$25,000.00
$3,605.00
$16,875.00
$3,850.00
$5,950.00
$4,025.00
$3,360.00
$4,375.00
$4,340.00
$2,275.00
$3,437.00
$4,095.00
$3,486.00
$6,916.00
$3,080.00
$15,000.00
$3,360.00
$5,460.00
$2,443.00
$6,251.00
$6,545.00
$3,941.00
2025-0024655 03/17/2025 14:09 03/17/2025 14:09:00
2025-0024729 03/17/2025 15:41 03/17/2025 15:41:00
2025-0024586 03/17/2025 12:18 03/17/2025 12:18:00
2025-0024622 03/17/2025 13:12 03/17/2025 13:12:00
2025-0024652 03/17/2025 14:06 03/17/2025 14:06:00
2025-0023841 03/14/2025 09:22 03/14/2025 09:22:00
2025-0024044 03/14/2025 13:22 03/14/2025 13:22:00
2025-0024115 03/14/2025 15:15 03/14/2025 15:15:00
2025-0023774 03/14/2025 08:40 03/14/2025 08:40:00
2025-0023788 03/14/2025 08:49 03/14/2025 08:49:00
2025-0023825 03/14/2025 09:11 03/14/2025 09:11:00
2025-0023084 03/12/2025 12:11 03/12/2025 12:11:00
2025-0023260 03/12/2025 15:15 03/12/2025 15:15:00
2025-0023359 03/13/2025 09:05 03/13/2025 09:05:00
2025-0022641 03/11/2025 14:49 03/11/2025 14:49:00
2025-0022697 03/11/2025 15:43 03/11/2025 15:43:00
2025-0023029 03/12/2025 11:09 03/12/2025 11:09:00
2025-0022284 03/11/2025 09:17 03/11/2025 09:17:00
2025-0022423 03/11/2025 11:34 03/11/2025 11:34:00
2025-0022621 03/11/2025 14:38 03/11/2025 14:38:00
2025-0021879 03/10/2025 09:46 03/10/2025 09:46:00
2025-0021990 03/10/2025 12:03 03/10/2025 12:03:00
2025-0022101 03/10/2025 14:37 03/10/2025 14:37:00
2025-0021206 03/07/2025 08:18 03/07/2025 08:18:00
2025-0021423 03/07/2025 10:10 03/07/2025 10:10:00
2025-0021554 03/07/2025 12:11 03/07/2025 12:11:00
2025-0020570 03/05/2025 13:27 03/05/2025 13:27:00
2025-0020906 03/06/2025 10:17 03/06/2025 10:17:00
2025-0021097 03/06/2025 14:18 03/06/2025 14:18:00
2025-0020445 03/05/2025 11:19 03/05/2025 11:19:00
2025-0020448 03/05/2025 11:21 03/05/2025 11:21:00
2025-0020486 03/05/2025 12:12 03/05/2025 12:12:00
2025-0019617 03/03/2025 14:36 03/03/2025 14:36:00
2025-0019644 03/03/2025 15:27 03/03/2025 15:27:00
2025-0019863 03/04/2025 10:19 03/04/2025 10:19:00
2025-0019498 03/03/2025 11:59 03/03/2025 11:59:00
2025-0019604 03/03/2025 14:03 03/03/2025 14:03:00
2025-0019612 03/03/2025 14:34 03/03/2025 14:34:00
Document No. Recording Date/Time Transaction Date/Time
2025-0019377 03/03/2025 09:46 03/03/2025 09:46:00
KRISTIN B. CONNELLY, CLERK-RECORDER
County of Contra Costa
555 Escobar Street * Martinez, CA 94553
Recorder (925) 335-7900 * Fax (925) 335-7926
Transfer Tax Monthly Detail by City
City: Rm Richmond
For Month: March 2025
For Richmond
Attachment 4 - Documentary Transfer Tax for March 2025 Page 2 of 3 414
$4,970.00
$350.00
$6,559.00
$2,107.00
$5,831.00
$3,920.00
$12,662.50
$4,270.00
$4,200.00
$3,150.00
$1,925.00
$3,815.00
$2,632.00
$6,160.00
$1,568.00
$3,052.00
$2,632.00
$3,640.00
$4,550.00
$4,550.00
$3,682.00
$5,453.00
$5,292.00
$5,215.00
$6,741.00
$5,530.00
$5,460.00
$3,570.00
$4,879.00
$3,150.00
$3,038.00
$5,145.00
$13,737.50
$1,820.00
$5,460.00
$6,090.00
$4,130.00
$80,000.00
Total $ of Cap docs $486,189.50
Total Count of Cap
docs
$486,189.50
Count: 77
2025-0029973 03/31/2025 16:22 03/31/2025 16:22:00
Total:
$423,609.50
52 2025-0029644 03/31/2025 10:53 03/31/2025 10:53:00
2025-0029847 03/31/2025 14:27 03/31/2025 14:27:00
2025-0029883 03/31/2025 15:34 03/31/2025 15:34:00
2025-0029220 03/28/2025 14:10 03/28/2025 14:10:00
2025-0029549 03/31/2025 09:31 03/31/2025 09:31:00
2025-0029582 03/31/2025 09:43 03/31/2025 09:43:00
2025-0028594 03/27/2025 11:41 03/27/2025 11:41:00
2025-0028858 03/28/2025 09:35 03/28/2025 09:35:00
2025-0029058 03/28/2025 11:12 03/28/2025 11:12:00
2025-0028199 03/26/2025 14:10 03/26/2025 14:10:00
2025-0028313 03/27/2025 07:55 03/27/2025 07:55:00
2025-0028543 03/27/2025 11:02 03/27/2025 11:02:00
2025-0027864 03/26/2025 08:51 03/26/2025 08:51:00
2025-0027926 03/26/2025 09:59 03/26/2025 09:59:00
2025-0027930 03/26/2025 10:00 03/26/2025 10:00:00
2025-0027365 03/25/2025 10:32 03/25/2025 10:32:00
2025-0027488 03/25/2025 12:11 03/25/2025 12:11:00
2025-0027502 03/25/2025 12:38 03/25/2025 12:38:00
2025-0026669 03/21/2025 15:33 03/21/2025 15:33:00
2025-0027121 03/24/2025 14:45 03/24/2025 14:45:00
2025-0027283 03/25/2025 08:56 03/25/2025 08:56:00
2025-0026326 03/21/2025 08:10 03/21/2025 08:10:00
2025-0026422 03/21/2025 09:25 03/21/2025 09:25:15
2025-0026539 03/21/2025 12:57 03/21/2025 12:57:00
2025-0026129 03/20/2025 11:33 03/20/2025 11:33:00
2025-0026204 03/20/2025 13:32 03/20/2025 13:32:00
2025-0026275 03/20/2025 15:27 03/20/2025 15:27:51
2025-0026032 03/20/2025 09:28 03/20/2025 09:28:00
2025-0026065 03/20/2025 10:18 03/20/2025 10:18:00
2025-0026080 03/20/2025 10:35 03/20/2025 10:35:00
2025-0025785 03/19/2025 15:35 03/19/2025 15:35:00
2025-0025826 03/20/2025 07:55 03/20/2025 07:55:00
2025-0025940 03/20/2025 08:44 03/20/2025 08:44:00
2025-0025029 03/18/2025 10:43 03/18/2025 10:43:00
2025-0025087 03/18/2025 11:30 03/18/2025 11:30:00
2025-0025124 03/18/2025 11:55 03/18/2025 11:55:00
2025-0024742 03/17/2025 16:01 03/17/2025 16:01:00
Attachment 4 - Documentary Transfer Tax for March 2025 Page 3 of 3 415

May 6, 2025
Finance Department
DATE: May 6, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Shasa Curl, City Manager
Nickie Mastay, Deputy City Manager – Internal Services
Andrea Miller, Director of Finance
Mubeen Qader, Deputy Director of Finance
Jerry Gurule, Accounting Manager
Antonio Banuelos, Accounting Manager
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarter 3 Budget Report
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for receiving this item

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

June 24, 2024
November 19, 2024
April 22, 2025

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

City staff are presenting the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25
Quarter 3 Budget Report for all funds, and the Capital
Improvement Projects Quarter 3 Report. The purpose of
this report is to monitor revenue and expenditure, as
compared to the approved budgeted amounts.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECEIVE the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarter 3 budget report for the period of July 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025 – Finance Department (Shasa Curl 510-620-
6512/Andrea Miller 510-620-6790/ Mubeen Qader 510-
412-2077/Jerry Gurule 510-620-6591).

AGENDA
REPORT
416

May 6, 2025
DISCUSSION:

The purpose of the quarterly budget report is to assist the City in monitoring revenue and expenditures, compared to the approved budgeted amounts. The report also allows staff, the City Council, and the community to monitor trends that impact the budget cycle.

This report presents an overview of Quarter 3 (Q3) operating, capital revenue, and expenditure for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25. The period covers budget activity from July 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. The threshold through the first three quarters of the fiscal year is 75 percent, meaning that it is expected that 75 percent of the Revised Budget will be expended. Revenues are not necessarily measured against the same standard due to the seasonality of major revenue sources, such as property taxes, which are received in December, April, and June each year.

General Fund
Table 1: FY 2024-25 General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Summary, Q3 General Fund Revenues
Overall, revenue received totaled $166.7 million (66.6 percent of budget) for Quarter 3 of FY 2024-25. This is below the threshold of 75 percent; the variance is primarily due to the seasonality of some revenue sources. For example, the City receives the Sales Tax revenue from the State with a two-month delay. Final Sales Tax payment will not be received until August, when it will be accrued and accounted for in the year it was earned.

Based on the current year’s actuals, prior year trends, extraordinary uncertainty and volatility, due to external factors such as federal and state fiscal policy, tariff-related impacts on the local and regional economy, and slower economic growth, City staff members project total FY 2024-25 revenue to remain at the current revised budget amount of approximately $250 million.

Table 1 above and Table 2 below summarize the Quarter 3 revenue budget-to-actuals and year-end projection (Attachment 1). Table 1 reflects that the original adopted FY 2024-25 budget was balanced, with current revenue equal to current year expenditures.

Although a deficit of $10,735,644 and use of fund balance is projected, this is covered by unspent funds appropriated by the City Council on March 11, 2025, Agenda Report Table 1 and Resolution No. 23-25, Resolution No. 128-24, and Resolution No. 133-24 (Attachment 4).

GENERAL FUND
FY 2024-25

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY 2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD
ACTUALS Q3 % USED
FY 2024-25

YEAR END

PROJECTION
TOTAL REVENUES 248,935,372 250,327,835 166,669,697 66.6% 250,327,835 TOTAL EXPENSES 248,935,372 266,672,389 180,529,826 70.5% 261,063,479

GENERAL FUND NET
+SURPLUS/(-DEFICIT) - (16,344,554) (13,860,130) (10,735,644) 417

May 6, 2025
Table 2: General Fund Revenue, FY 2024-25, Quarter 3
Changes weren’t recommended for the General Fund revenues at Mid-Year. Although some revenue streams are expected to exceed projections and others to fall short, the overall anticipation is that revenues are estimated to align with or slightly exceed the budgeted figures. However, due to ongoing global volatility and Executive Orders targeting Sanctuary Jurisdictions, the City of Richmond’s revenues and expenditures could quickly change. As such, at this point, no changes to the General Fund are recommended for Quarter 3.
 Property Tax - FY 2024-25 Property Tax revenue adopted budget includes estimated Assessed Valuation (AV) growth of 4.6 percent for Secured Property Taxes and matched Contra Costa County’s 2024-2025 Assessment Roll released in July 2024, which also indicated growth of the AV at 4.6 percent for Secured Property Taxes. No changes are proposed for this category.  Sales & Use Tax - Sales Tax revenue in FY 2024-25 is expected to be lower than last year. After several years of significant growth, this revenue stream has slowed down. The decrease is due to several factors, including a slowdown in the economy. The main categories seeing a decrease are Transportation, which includes auto dealerships and service stations, and Business-to-Business, which includes industry and green energy. Staff are not proposing changes at this time.  Utility Users Tax (UUT) - The year-to-date revenue received for UUT is trending as expected. UUT is comprised of gas, electricity, cable, and telecommunications. The revenue streams trending slightly higher are being offset by the revenue streams trending lower; staff does not recommend adjustments at this time.

GENERAL FUND
FY 2024-25

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY 2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD
ACTUALS Q3

AVAILABLE
BUDGET % USED
FY 2024-25

YEAR END

PROJECTION
PROPERTY TAXES 57,597,487 57,597,487 29,333,660 28,263,827 50.9% 57,597,487 SALES & USE TAX 60,456,550 60,901,150 33,489,349 27,411,801 55.0% 60,901,150 UTILITY USERS TAX 62,092,359 62,092,359 47,157,840 14,934,519 75.9% 62,092,359 OTHER TAXES 23,405,397 23,405,397 14,426,687 8,978,711 61.6% 23,405,397 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 16,252,770 16,352,770 12,402,168 3,950,602 75.8% 16,352,770 FINES & FORFEITURES 176,438 176,438 208,574 (32,136) 118.2% 176,438 INTEREST INCOME 1,796,421 1,796,421 2,408,691 (612,270) 134.1% 1,796,421 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3,255,703 3,255,703 2,102,655 1,153,048 64.6% 3,255,703 OTHER REVENUE 142,830 142,830 311,029 (168,199) 217.8% 142,830 RENTAL INCOME 777,478 777,478 780,837 (3,359) 100.4% 777,478 INTERGOVERMENT STATE TAXES 125,000 125,000 182,741 (57,741) 146.2% 125,000 STATE GRANT 130,000 130,000 280,251 (150,251) 215.6% 130,000 OTHER GRANT 250,000 250,000 304,690 (54,690) 121.9% 250,000 PROCEEDS FROM SALE PROPERTY 15,000 15,000 32,814 (17,814) 218.8% 15,000 LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS 40,400 40,400 - 40,400 0.0% 40,400
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 22,421,539 23,269,402 23,247,712 21,690 99.9% 23,269,402 TOTAL REVENUES 248,935,372 250,327,835 166,669,697 83,658,139 66.6% 250,327,835 418

May 6, 2025
 Other Taxes - Other Taxes include franchise fees, hotel tax, and documentary transfer tax. Of the major revenue streams, the documentary transfer tax is the most volatile and hardest to predict, as the month-to-month actual varies significantly. One or two sales can have a significant impact on the tax amount.

Gas and Electricity Franchise fees were projected to increase by 130 percent; however, the current actuals only increased by 78 percent or $3.3 million, $2.2 million less than initially forecasted. At this juncture, adjustments are not proposed in this category.
 Licenses, Permits, & Fees – This revenue stream includes the business tax revenue. The actual revenue collected through March 2025 is $12.4 million (75.8 percent of the budget). Business tax revenue received year-to-date includes new Richmond businesses that started this fiscal year and delinquent payments from the prior year. With the 2025 due dates of March 1 for rental properties and April 1 for non-rental businesses, the bulk of the business tax for rentals was received in February and March, while for the non-rentals it is received between March and April. No changes to this category are proposed.

General Fund Expenditures
Overall, actual expenditures totaled $180.5 million (67.7 percent of the budget) through Quarter 3 of FY 2024-25. Expenditures are trending lower than the approved revised budgeted amounts due to higher vacancies and several pending unspent encumbrances. Including encumbrances, the expenditures are 70.5 percent of the budget, below the 75 percent threshold. Encumbrances are funds earmarked for specific operating expenditures, such as copier leases. Based on the current year’s actuals and prior year’s trend, City staff project the total FY 2024-25 expenditure to be approximately $261 million by fiscal year-end. Table 3 below summarizes the expenditure budget-to-actuals through March 31, 2025 (Attachment 1).

Table 3: General Fund Expenditure, FY2024-25, Quarter 3 - Table  Salaries & Wages - include base salaries for full-time and part-time staff, overtime, and other pay types. Actual expenditures totaled $66.0 million (69.2 percent of the budget). This category is lower than the threshold primarily due to vacant positions.  Benefits - include medical, dental, workers' compensation, CalPERS pension costs, other post-employment benefits (OPEB), and other benefits. Actual expenditures

GENERAL FUND
FY 2024-25

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY 2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD
ACTUALS Q3 ENCUMB. AVAILABLE BUDGET
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED
FY 2024-25

YEAR END

PROJECTION
SALARIES AND WAGES 95,236,672 95,303,620 65,985,292 - 29,318,327 69.2% 69.2% 88,547,507 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 70,666,262 70,548,062 51,358,767 - 19,189,295 72.8% 72.8% 71,695,265 PROFESSIONAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 20,378,340 23,163,189 10,900,394 3,720,062 8,542,733 47.1% 63.1% 23,163,189 OTHER OPERATING 8,862,886 8,623,649 4,264,314 1,617,989 2,741,346 49.4% 68.2% 8,623,649 UTILITIES 5,594,204 5,626,060 4,797,531 440,891 387,638 85.3% 93.1% 5,626,060 EQUIPMENT & CONTRACT SVCS 4,315,665 4,495,781 2,085,143 837,186 1,573,452 46.4% 65.0% 4,495,781 PROVISN FOR INSURANCE LOSS 35,500 37,042 34,392 - 2,650 92.8% 92.8% 37,042 COST POOL 23,400,598 24,750,598 18,525,451 - 6,225,146 74.8% 74.8% 24,750,598 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,502,328 3,284,099 855,181 746,760 1,682,158 26.0% 48.8% 3,284,099 DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURE 850,905 850,905 423,262 - 427,643 49.7% 49.7% 850,905 A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (3,514,373) (3,514,373) (2,733,463) - (780,910) 77.8% 77.8% (3,514,373) GRANT EXPENDITURES 49,013 52,246 (1,297) - 53,543 -2.5% -2.5% 52,246 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 20,557,373 33,451,511 24,034,858 - 9,416,652 71.8% 71.8% 33,451,511 TOTAL EXPENSES 248,935,372 266,672,389 180,529,826 7,362,887 78,779,675 67.7% 70.5% 261,063,479 419

May 6, 2025
totaling $51.4 million (72.8 percent of the budget) are below the threshold due to vacant positions.
 Professional & Admin Services - include professional and consulting services, and contractual obligations, such as animal control services. Actual expenditures total $10.9 million (47.1 percent of the budget) and are below the threshold. Factoring in encumbrances of $3.7 million, the total is $14.6 million (63.1 percent of the budget).  Other Operating - includes copier leases, office supplies, and other items. The actual expenditure totals $4.3 million (49.4 percent of the budget). Factoring in encumbrances of $1.6 million, the total is $5.9 million (68.2 percent of the budget).  Utilities - include gas, electricity, water, refuse, telephone, and internet services.

Actual expenditure totals $4.8 million (85.3 percent of the budget). Factoring in the purchase order encumbrance of $440,891, the total is $5.2 million (93.1 percent of the budget).
 Equipment & Contract Services - equipment and maintenance/repair services.

Actual expenditure totals $2.1 million (46.4 percent of the budget). Factoring in encumbrances of $837,186, the total is $2.9 million (65.0 percent of the budget).  Cost Pool - includes vehicle replacement, general liability, and Civic Center debt allocation, since these charges are distributed equally through monthly journals, the expenditures are at the threshold of 75 percent.
 Asset/Capital Outlay - includes capital purchases and major facility and infrastructure upgrades. Total expenditures, including encumbrance, are 48.8 percent of the threshold.
 Debt Service - includes debt payments per the debt service schedule, and total expenditures are 49.7 percent of the budget.
 A87 Cost Plan Reimbursement - includes the administrative overhead credit from non-General Fund programs, which are booked monthly journals; hence, the expenditures are at 77.8 percent of the budget due to reimbursement from the Successor Agency, which was not budgeted.
 Grant Expenditures - includes Recreation’s I Heart Richmond grant expenditures.

Year-to-date actuals are showing a negative expenditure amount due to a returned grant balance from a grantee.
 Transfers Out - include transfers from the General Fund to non-General Funds for operating subsidies and a portion of debt service. Actual expenditures total $24.0 million (71.8 percent of the budget). City staff continue to monitor Non-General funds financial activity to assess if additional General Fund subsidies are needed to cover the funding gap. Based on the analysis below several funds listed may need additional subsidies to prevent negative fund balances at the end of FY 2024-25:
o Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District: The current budgeted operating subsidy is $243,068. However, revenue growth is insufficient to cover the increase in operating expenditures, and the fund will require reductions in services and/or an additional subsidy of approximately $300,000 by the end of the current fiscal year.
420

May 6, 2025
o KCRT—Cable TV: The fund is experiencing a decline in revenue from the Utility User Tax due to a decreasing trend in cable subscriptions. There is no current budgeted subsidy from the General Fund for FY 2024-25.

However, the expected revenue appears insufficient to cover expenditures, and a subsidy will likely be required to balance the fund by the end of the fiscal year.
o Richmond Housing Authority: the program has a $351,927 General Fund subsidy for the current fiscal year. However, the program requires up to $3,500,000 in capital funding to renovate 17 fire/structural units. This funding may be considered for allocation from the unspent funds at the end of FY 2024-25 as part of the Q4 update.
o
Non-General Funds
Non-General Fund Revenues
Overall, 51.3 percent of Non-General Fund revenues have been collected and are trending as expected. The timing of receipts varies among the funds based on the source of funding. For instance, grant funds are typically received after expenditures are incurred and reimbursement requests are submitted to grantors. Table 4 below summarizes the revenue budget-to-actuals for Non-General Funds (Attachment 2).

Table 4: Non-General Fund Revenues, FY 2024-25, Quarter 3 Major fund types include the following:
 Capital Improvement Funds - total revenue is 39.0 percent of the budget. A large part of the variance is due to the grants that are pending reimbursement.  Debt Service Funds – transfer in revenue is 88.9 percent of the budget, which is consistent with the debt service payment schedules.
 Enterprise Funds - total revenue is 63.1 percent of the budget because revenue in these funds is received in the last quarter of the fiscal year.  Housing Funds - total housing funds are 53.2 percent of the budget. Major funds in this category include the housing in-lieu fee, Community Development Block Grant, and Neighborhood Stabilization Funds.
 Richmond Housing Authority - total revenue is 65.8 percent of the budget; a FUND
FY 2024-25

ORIGINAL
BUDGET

REVISED

BUDGET ACTUALS AVAILABLE BUDGET
% USED W.

ENCUMB.

Total Capital Improvement Fund 63,990,718 81,358,013 31,712,719 49,645,294 39.0% Total Debt Service Funds 16,161,500 16,161,500 14,363,299 1,798,201 88.9% Total Enterprise Funds 39,394,502 39,394,502 24,862,402 14,532,100 63.1% Total Housing Funds 2,702,120 2,718,720 1,446,091 1,272,628 53.2% Total Housing Authority Funds 4,676,806 4,676,806 3,079,559 1,597,247 65.8% Total Internal Service Funds 36,850,188 38,150,188 30,656,842 7,493,345 80.4% Total Other Operations Funds 27,524,024 28,621,524 16,374,361 12,247,163 57.2% Total Special Revenue Funds 62,708,434 86,697,840 30,311,934 56,385,906 100.0% Total All Funds 254,008,291 297,779,092 152,807,208 144,971,884 51.3% 421

May 6, 2025
major part of the revenue is received in the last quarter of the fiscal year.  Internal Service Funds - total revenue is 80.4 percent of the budget due to an interest earned allocation, which is an unbudgeted line item.  Other Operations Funds - total revenue is 57.2 percent of the budget. The variance is due to pending grant revenue reimbursements.  Special Revenue Funds - total revenues are 35.0 percent of the budget. A large part of the variance is due to the Transformative Climate Community and Encampment Resolution Grants, with a total revenue budget of $19.6 million.

These grants are on a reimbursement basis, and revenue reimbursements are pending.

Non-General Fund Expenditures
Overall, 49.0 percent of Non-General Fund budget appropriations have been expended, including encumbrances. Spending patterns in other funds are like those in the General Fund and are trending as expected. Most of the actual expenditures are below the threshold of 75 percent, except for Debt Service funds. Those amounts that exceed the threshold are primarily due to encumbrances. Table 5 below summarizes the expenditure budget-to-actuals for Non-General Funds (Attachment 2).

Table 5: Non-General Fund Expenditures, FY 2023-24 Quarter 3 - Table  Capital Improvement Funds - total expenditures without encumbrance is 16.3 percent, and with encumbrances is 36.3 percent. The reason for this variance is that several projects are fully appropriated in the current fiscal year via the General Capital Fund, even though the projects are multi-year (Attachment 3).  Debt Service Funds - total expenditures are 88.9 percent of the budget due to the debt service schedules.
 Enterprise Funds - total expenditure without encumbrance is 36.7 percent, and with encumbrance is 46.6 percent. The primary reason for the positive variance is that the capital projects in the Wastewater Fund are moving more slowly than expected.
 Housing Funds - total expenditure without encumbrance is 13.1 percent and with encumbrances, 16.5 percent. The primary source of the positive variance is the Community Development Block Grants fund.
 Richmond Housing Authority Funds - total expenditure without encumbrance is

57.6 percent of the budget and 62.9 percent with encumbrance. The major FUND
FY 2024-25

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY 2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD
ACTUALS Q3 ENCUMB. AVAILABLE BUDGET
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED
W.

ENCUM
Total Capital Improvement Fund 69,582,572 108,788,861 17,766,494 21,747,388 69,274,978 16.3% 36.3% Total Debt Service Funds 16,261,836 16,261,836 14,455,010 - 1,806,826 88.9% 88.9% Total Enterprise Funds 73,915,051 87,954,067 32,295,247 8,722,711 46,936,110 36.7% 46.6% Total Housing Funds 5,821,825 6,098,867 800,732 204,728 5,093,408 13.1% 16.5% Total Housing Authority Funds 4,685,856 4,685,856 2,698,172 250,939 1,736,745 57.6% 62.9% Total Internal Service Funds 42,736,426 47,087,951 24,747,806 3,492,039 18,848,106 52.6% 60.0% Total Other Operations Funds 30,507,007 34,165,219 16,495,543 4,842,217 12,827,459 48.3% 62.5% Total Special Revenue Funds 88,567,660 126,391,074 43,610,742 19,487,756 63,292,576 34.5% 49.9% Total All Funds 332,078,233 431,433,732 152,869,746 58,747,779 219,816,207 35.4% 49.0% 422

May 6, 2025
source of the positive variance is expenditures trending lower than budgeted in Nevin Plaza and Hacienda divisions.
 Internal Service Funds - total expenditure is 52.6 percent without encumbrances and 60.0 percent with encumbrances. A major driver of the variance is the pending procurement of vehicles.
 Other Operations Funds - total expenditure without encumbrances is 48.3 percent of the budget and 62.5 percent with encumbrances. A major source of the positive variance is the grant expenditure on several funds.  Special Revenue - total expenditure is 34.5 percent of the budget without encumbrance and 49.9 percent with encumbrance. A major source of the positive variance is the Transformative Climate Community and Encampment Resolution Fund grants.

Next Steps
The Q3 budget review projects the FY 2024-25 year-end General Fund revenue at $250,327,835 and expenditures at $261,063,479. Although a deficit of $10,735,644 and use of fund balance is projected, this is covered by unspent funds appropriated by the City Council on March 11, 2025, Agenda Report Table 1 and Resolution No. 23-25, Resolution No. 128-24, and Resolution No. 133-24 (Attachment 4). These projections are based on current actuals and anticipated results. City staff will monitor revenues and expenditures closely as we finalize the current fiscal year, to determine if further adjustments are necessary during the Q4 budget review.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – FY 2023-24 Q3 Budget Review – General Fund by Department Attachment 2 – FY 2023-24 Q3 Budget Review – Non-General Fund by Type Attachment 3 – Capital Improvements Project by Fund
Attachment 4 – March 11, 2025 Staff Report and Resolution No. 23-25, Resolution No. 128-24, and Resolution No. 133-24
423
Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES

GENERAL FUND REVENUE & EXPENDITURE SUMMARY

GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY BY CHARACTER
PROPERTY TAXES (57,597,487) (57,597,487) (29,333,660) - 51% 51% (28,263,827) [1] SALES & USE TAX (60,456,550) (60,901,150) (33,489,349) - 55% 55% (27,411,801) [2] UTILITY USERS TAX (62,092,359) (62,092,359) (47,157,840) - 76% 76% (14,934,519) OTHER TAXES (23,405,397) (23,405,397) (14,426,687) - 62% 62% (8,978,711) [3] LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (16,252,770) (16,352,770) (12,402,168) - 76% 76% (3,950,602) [4] FINES & FORFEITURES (176,438) (176,438) (208,574) - 118% 118% 32,136 [5] USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (1,796,421) (1,796,421) (2,408,691) - 134% 134% 612,270 [6] CHARGES FOR SERVICES (3,255,703) (3,255,703) (2,102,655) - 65% 65% (1,153,048) [7] OTHER REVENUE (142,830) (142,830) (311,029) - 218% 218% 168,199 [8] RENTAL INCOME (777,478) (777,478) (780,837) - 100% 100% 3,359 INTERGOV STATE TAXES (125,000) (125,000) (182,741) - 146% 146% 57,741 [9] INTERGOV STATE GRANT (130,000) (130,000) (280,251) - 216% 216% 150,251 [10] INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (250,000) (250,000) (304,690) - 122% 122% 54,690 [11] PROC FR SLE PROP (15,000) (15,000) (32,814) - 219% 219% 17,814 [12] LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (40,400) (40,400) - - 0% 0% (40,400) [13] OPER XFERS IN (22,421,539) (23,269,402) (23,247,712) - 100% 100% (21,690) [14] TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE (248,935,372) (250,327,835) (166,669,697) - 67% 67% (83,658,139) NOTES:
[1] Property tax assessments are received in December, April and June. [2] Revenues are not received equally monthly.
[3] This is the most volatile revenue stream and can vary significantly from month to month and a few large sales will have a significant impact. [4,5] Revenues are not received equally monthly.
[6] Realized gain on interest and interest on the pooled cash. [7] Revenues are not received equally monthly.
[8] Other misc revenue is from donations, surplus and HRP Campus Bay. [9] Motor vehicle fee revenue is expected in 3rd quarter. [10] Revenue received is for post reimbursement for Police and SB90 mandates. [11] Supplemental Law Enforcement Grant revenue from prior and current year. [12] Proceeds from Sales and Bond Proceeds is for equipment sent to public action. It is public policy for asset disposal and does not occur monthly. [13] Budget is for Housing & Community Development Department outstanding loans associated with disallowed cost by HUD. [14] Completed PTORS transfer in for the year.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
SALARIES AND WAGES 95,236,672 95,303,620 65,985,292 - 69% 69% 29,318,327 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 70,666,262 70,548,062 51,358,767 - 73% 73% 19,189,295 PROF & ADMIN 20,378,340 23,163,189 10,900,394 3,720,062 63% 47% 8,542,733 OTHER OPERATING 8,862,886 8,623,649 4,264,314 1,617,989 68% 49% 2,741,346 UTILITIES 5,594,204 5,626,060 4,797,531 440,891 93% 85% 387,638 [15] EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 4,315,665 4,495,781 2,085,143 837,186 65% 46% 1,573,452 PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 35,500 37,042 34,392 - 93% 93% 2,650 [16] COST POOL 23,400,598 24,750,598 18,525,451 - 75% 75% 6,225,146 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,502,328 3,284,099 855,181 746,760 49% 26% 1,682,158 DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 850,905 850,905 423,262 - 50% 50% 427,643 A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (3,514,373) (3,514,373) (2,733,463) - 78% 78% (780,910) [17] GRANT EXPENDITURES 49,013 52,246 (1,297) - -2% -2% 53,543 [18] OPER XFERS OUT 20,557,373 33,451,511 24,034,858 - 72% 72% 9,416,652 [18] TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE 248,935,372 266,672,389 180,529,826 7,362,887 70% 68% 78,779,675 NOTES
[15] PO's encumbered with Verizon Wireless and Pacific Bell for telephone services. [16] Insurance payment for Fire Apparatus, Fire Boat, and Police drone. [17] Slightly over threshold due to prepaid facilities maintenance, prepaid electric and prepaid water allocation. [18] Participant incentive returned.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES

GENERAL FUND BY DEPARTMENT BY REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES
10 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
OTHER REVENUE - - (3,920) - - - 3,920 [19]
REVENUE - - (3,920) - - - 3,920
SALARIES AND WAGES 483,552 483,552 236,467 - 49% 49% 247,085 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 249,137 249,137 137,909 - 55% 55% 111,228 PROF & ADMIN 31,200 31,200 8,551 - 27% 27% 22,649
OTHER OPERATING 6,200 6,200 1,789 - 29% 29% 4,411
UTILITIES 3,000 3,000 3,149 - 105% 105% (149) [20]
COST POOL 23,706 23,706 17,781 - 75% 75% 5,925
EXPENDITURE 796,795 796,795 405,646 - 51% 51% 391,149
11 CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES AND WAGES 395,108 395,108 312,090 - 79% 79% 83,018 [21] PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 256,608 256,608 225,561 - 88% 88% 31,047 [22] PROF & ADMIN 58,080 58,080 26,441 - 46% 46% 31,639
OTHER OPERATING 18,800 18,800 7,815 2,108 53% 42% 8,877 UTILITIES 1,100 1,100 - - 0% 0% 1,100
COST POOL 114,532 114,532 85,900 - 75% 75% 28,632
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,000 3,000 521 - 17% 17% 2,479
EXPENDITURE 847,227 847,227 658,326 2,108 78% 78% 186,793 12 COMMUNITY POL REV COMMISSION
SALARIES AND WAGES 50,000 50,000 14,726 - 29% 29% 35,274 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 6,212 6,212 5,178 - 83% 83% 1,034 [23] PROF & ADMIN 24,450 24,450 3,268 4,413 31% 13% 16,770
OTHER OPERATING 1,050 1,050 5 - 0% 0% 1,045
COST POOL 5,917 5,917 4,438 - 75% 75% 1,479
EXPENDITURE 87,629 87,629 27,615 4,413 37% 32% 55,602
NOTES:
[19] Revenue is for CC Mayors Conference Oct24.
[20] Payment to Verizon Wireless.
[21] Part tme salaries not budgeted.
[22] HealthIinsurance, Dental Insurance, Employee Assistance and Unemployment Insurance are trending high for the year. [23] Unemployment Insurance trending higher than anticipated.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
13 CITY MANAGER
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,107,662 1,107,662 591,986 - 53% 53% 515,676 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 439,885 439,885 233,171 - 53% 53% 206,714 PROF & ADMIN 170,750 143,750 46,977 28,411 52% 33% 68,362 OTHER OPERATING 13,300 20,443 13,324 1,481 72% 65% 5,637 UTILITIES 100 100 440 - 440% 440% (340) [24]
COST POOL 99,534 99,534 74,652 - 75% 75% 24,882
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 174 - - - (174) [25]
A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (179,572) (179,572) (134,680) - 75% 75% (44,892) EXPENDITURE 1,651,658 1,631,801 826,043 29,892 52% 51% 775,865 14 CITY CLERK
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (600) (600) (5,006) - 834% 834% 4,406 [26] CHARGES FOR SERVICES (3,000) (3,000) (3,780) - 126% 126% 780 OTHER REVENUE - - (3,960) - - - 3,960 [27]
REVENUE (3,600) (3,600) (12,746) - 354% 354% 9,146
SALARIES AND WAGES 565,827 565,827 409,067 - 72% 72% 156,760 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 303,802 303,802 231,207 - 76% 76% 72,595 [28] PROF & ADMIN 416,742 420,022 267,849 12,846 67% 64% 139,327 OTHER OPERATING 20,300 17,020 10,673 1,725 73% 63% 4,623 UTILITIES 1,000 1,000 694 - 69% 69% 306
COST POOL 23,706 23,706 17,781 - 75% 75% 5,925
A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (70,119) (70,119) (52,590) - 75% 75% (17,529) EXPENDITURE 1,261,258 1,261,258 884,680 14,570 71% 70% 362,007 NOTES:
[24] Administrative adjustment, overage will correct in period 10. Will move from CM Transportation 01135013-400401 to Transportation Department 10385051-400401. [25] Will work with department to reclass actual.
[26] Received candidate filing fees for running for City Council. [27] Other miscellaneous revenue not budgeted.
[28] Professional development budget is exhausted for the year and workers comp clerical is slightly high for the period.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
15 CITY ATTORNEY
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (2,000) (2,000) (375) - 19% 19% (1,625) [29] REVENUE (2,000) (2,000) (375) - 19% 19% (1,625)
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,743,603 1,744,103 908,762 - 52% 52% 835,341 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 701,272 701,272 405,479 - 58% 58% 295,793 PROF & ADMIN 1,046,168 1,600,294 839,504 76,639 57% 52% 684,151 OTHER OPERATING 27,750 26,000 9,684 12,978 87% 37% 3,337 [30] UTILITIES - 2,250 2,215 - 98% 98% 35 [31]
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 1,250 750 34 - 5% 5% 716
COST POOL 93,953 93,953 70,466 - 75% 75% 23,487
A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (317,531) (317,531) (238,148) - 75% 75% (79,383) EXPENDITURE 3,296,465 3,851,092 1,997,997 89,617 54% 52% 1,763,478 16 PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (927,500) (927,500) (378,589) - 41% 41% (548,911) [32] OTHER REVENUE (30,000) (30,000) (52,211) - 174% 174% 22,211 [33] REVENUE (957,500) (957,500) (430,800) - 45% 45% (526,700) SALARIES AND WAGES 942,252 962,252 456,455 - 47% 47% 505,797 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 577,002 577,002 281,528 - 49% 49% 295,475 PROF & ADMIN 875,400 855,400 263,233 246,819 60% 31% 345,348 OTHER OPERATING 128,947 28,947 5,704 - 20% 20% 23,243
UTILITIES 11,500 11,500 5,128 6,372 100% 45% - [34]
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 12,049 92,049 10,344 70,589 88% 11% 11,116 [35] COST POOL 96,486 96,486 72,363 - 75% 75% 24,123
EXPENDITURE 2,643,636 2,623,636 1,094,755 323,780 54% 42% 1,205,102 NOTES:
[29] Revenues are not received equally monthly.
[30] PO encumbered with Ricoh USA Inc. for copier lease. [31] Payment to Verizon Wireless for cell phone service. [32] Revenues are not received equally monthly.
[33] Received an unexpected refund in Code Enforcement. [34] PO encumbered with Verizon Wireless for Code Enforcement telephone service. [35] PO encumbered with Motorola Solutions, Inc for hand radios for Code Enforcement.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
17 FINANCE
SALARIES AND WAGES 4,359,114 4,359,114 2,889,421 - 66% 66% 1,469,693 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 2,466,251 2,466,251 1,696,145 - 69% 69% 770,106 PROF & ADMIN 1,029,680 1,029,680 620,418 145,641 74% 60% 263,621 OTHER OPERATING 61,200 61,200 43,069 6,377 81% 70% 11,754 [36] UTILITIES 1,400 1,400 2,853 - 204% 204% (1,453) [37]
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 2,135 2,135 426 774 56% 20% 935
COST POOL 318,519 318,519 238,893 - 75% 75% 79,626
A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (1,146,811) (1,146,811) (860,116) - 75% 75% (286,695) EXPENDITURE 7,091,488 7,091,488 4,631,111 152,792 67% 65% 2,307,586 18 HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,586,246 1,586,246 1,057,608 - 67% 67% 528,638 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 782,442 782,442 529,561 - 68% 68% 252,880 PROF & ADMIN 1,119,700 1,192,025 468,025 612,375 91% 39% 111,626 [38] OTHER OPERATING 35,705 32,705 24,382 6,327 94% 75% 1,997 [39] UTILITIES 1,500 1,500 5,206 - 347% 347% (3,706) [40]
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 150 150 - - 0% 0% 150
COST POOL 819,993 819,993 614,994 - 75% 75% 204,999
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY - 4,000 - - 0% 0% 4,000
A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (183,390) (183,390) (137,544) - 75% 75% (45,846) EXPENDITURE 4,162,346 4,235,671 2,562,233 618,701 75% 60% 1,054,737 NOTES:
[36] PO encumbered with Ricoh USA, Inc. for copier lease. [37] Payment to Verizon Wireless for service. Will process budget transfer to clear negative line. [38] PO's encumbered with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore for legal services and the Law Office of Todd Simonson, PC to conduct impartial personnel investigations. [39] PO's encumbered with Ricoh Inc. for large and small copiers equipment, and maintenance. [40] Payment to Verizon Wireless for service. Will work with department to clear shortfall.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
19 POLICE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (85,000) (85,000) (157,553) - 185% 185% 72,553 FINES & FORFEITURES (50,000) (50,000) (125,547) - 251% 251% 75,547 CHARGES FOR SERVICES (855,000) (855,000) (637,654) - 75% 75% (217,346) OTHER REVENUE (15,000) (15,000) (7,272) - 48% 48% (7,728) [41] INTERGOV STATE GRANT (30,000) (30,000) (121,916) - 406% 406% 91,916 INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (250,000) (250,000) (286,563) - 115% 115% 36,563 [42] REVENUE (1,285,000) (1,285,000) (1,336,505) - 104% 104% 51,505 SALARIES AND WAGES 40,074,136 40,074,136 25,955,439 - 65% 65% 14,118,697 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 30,298,023 30,298,023 19,585,532 - 65% 65% 10,712,491 PROF & ADMIN 5,889,178 5,923,388 4,033,734 1,463,436 93% 68% 426,219 [43] OTHER OPERATING 3,123,255 3,039,548 2,171,606 558,490 90% 71% 309,452 [44] UTILITIES 320,000 322,000 175,587 131,413 95% 55% 15,000 [45] EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 462,500 376,358 257,550 100,887 95% 68% 17,921 [46] PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 7,000 7,000 5,850 - 84% 84% 1,150 [47] COST POOL 5,849,546 5,849,546 4,387,157 - 75% 75% 1,462,389 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 759,282 892,920 350,258 242,022 66% 39% 300,640 EXPENDITURE 86,782,921 86,782,921 56,922,714 2,496,248 68% 66% 27,363,959 NOTES:
[41] Budget is for misc. records service and is unpredictable. [42] Revenue received is State reimbursement to offset costs of law enforcement agency. [45] PO's encumbered with T-Mobile, Pacific Bell and Verizon Wireless for cell phone service FY2025. [46] Added funds to PO for Sharjo Inc. for RPD Biohazard waste cleaning and gym sanitization. [47] Payment to California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority for RPD drone insurance premium FY2025. [43] PO's encumbered with RPAL for PD contribution, Public Safety Family Counseling Group, Inc. for RPD staff and family counseling, Chaplin and Hill Investigative Services, LLC for third party workforce investigations, and Serological Research Institute for DNA analysis for investigations. [44] Multiple PO's encumbered for software maintenance for: GPS monitoring, Calid remote access, netmotion wireless services, RPD cellphone investigation tools, and VeriFone redact applications.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
20 FIRE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (805,000) (805,000) (477,503) - 59% 59% (327,497) [48] CHARGES FOR SERVICES (870,503) (870,503) (521,922) - 60% 60% (348,581) [49] OTHER REVENUE - - (320) - - - 320 [50]
INTERGOV OTHER GRANT - - (18,127) - - - 18,127 [51]
REVENUE (1,675,503) (1,675,503) (1,017,872) - 61% 61% (657,631) SALARIES AND WAGES 21,141,346 21,141,346 14,458,723 - 68% 68% 6,682,623 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 17,196,840 17,196,840 11,969,214 - 70% 70% 5,227,626 PROF & ADMIN 716,265 723,523 342,867 161,090 70% 47% 219,565 OTHER OPERATING 793,524 842,124 216,328 87,241 36% 26% 538,555 UTILITIES 33,500 33,500 15,598 - 47% 47% 17,902
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 408,950 407,408 165,968 150,092 78% 41% 91,348 [52] PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 27,000 28,542 28,542 - 100% 100% 0 [53] COST POOL 3,482,115 4,782,115 3,586,582 - 75% 75% 1,195,533 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 25,500 25,500 4,733 - 19% 19% 20,767 DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 113,074 113,074 57,155 - 51% 51% 55,919 OPER XFERS OUT 326,019 326,019 244,509 - 75% 75% 81,510 EXPENDITURE 44,264,133 45,619,991 31,090,220 398,424 69% 68% 14,131,347 21 OFFICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,907,259 1,907,259 1,089,801 - 57% 57% 817,458 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 1,057,603 1,057,603 688,209 - 65% 65% 369,395 PROF & ADMIN 783,710 832,910 39,655 15,000 7% 5% 778,255 OTHER OPERATING 97,640 98,440 10,067 2,482 13% 10% 85,891 UTILITIES 20,000 20,000 12,167 - 61% 61% 7,833
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS - - 763 - - - (763) [54]
COST POOL 88,758 88,758 66,570 - 75% 75% 22,188
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 28,000 28,000 246 - 1% 1% 27,754
GRANT EXPENDITURES 34,497 34,497 - - 0% 0% 34,497
EXPENDITURE 4,017,467 4,067,467 1,907,476 17,482 47% 47% 2,142,510 NOTES:
[48] Fire inspections fees are low for the year. [49] Charges for services for Fire Suppression and Fire Prevention are posted for the year. [50] Support Division, other reimb-refund, prism no claim bonus fire. [51] Record Contra Costa County receipt for vaccine grant. [52] PO encumbered with IFIT Inc. for Fire Station fitness equipment. [53] Payment to California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority for Fire apparatus insurance premium FY2025. [54] ONS fuel and labor charges not budgeted.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
23 PUBLIC WORK & ENGINEERING SVCS
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (86,100) (86,100) (62,849) - 73% 73% (23,251) [55] CHARGES FOR SERVICES (1,395,000) (1,395,000) (928,946) - 67% 67% (466,054) [55] OTHER REVENUE - - (10,561) - - - 10,561 [56]
RENTAL INCOME (18,000) (18,000) (13,813) - 77% 77% (4,187) PROC FR SLE PROP (15,000) (15,000) (32,814) - 219% 219% 17,814 [57] REVENUE (1,514,100) (1,514,100) (1,048,984) - 69% 69% (465,116) SALARIES AND WAGES 12,255,271 12,383,233 8,188,994 - 66% 66% 4,194,239 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 9,251,379 9,133,179 6,361,749 - 70% 70% 2,771,430 PROF & ADMIN 1,138,639 1,506,276 515,690 229,695 49% 34% 760,891 OTHER OPERATING 2,943,240 2,841,735 1,439,635 797,323 79% 51% 604,777 [58] UTILITIES 4,687,604 4,703,104 4,023,649 242,190 91% 86% 437,264 [59] EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 1,152,300 1,336,600 677,533 404,709 81% 51% 254,359 [60] COST POOL 5,163,045 5,163,045 3,872,283 - 75% 75% 1,290,762 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 619,000 643,305 16,514 135,112 24% 3% 491,678 DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 737,831 737,831 366,107 - 50% 50% 371,724 A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (644,238) (644,238) (580,853) - 90% 90% (63,385) [61] EXPENDITURE 37,304,071 37,804,071 24,881,302 1,809,029 71% 66% 11,113,741 NOTES:
[55] Revenues are not received equally monthly.
[56] Actual is for EV retail bonus from Folsom Lake Ford, antenna lease Nicholl Knob and other misc. revenue. [57] PW auction sale of equipment came in higher than budget. [58] Multiple PO's encumbered for equipment rental, clothing, materials and supplies. [59] PO's encumbered with ABAG Publicly Owned Energy Resources for governmental agency gas expense and Verizon Wireless for Abatement's cell phone account. [61] Includes the prepaid facility maintenance, prepaid electric and prepaid water allocation. [60] Multiple PO's encumbered for contract services for: paint supplies & materials; roll-up door & automatic gate; emergency generator inspection; pool equipment, maintenance & services; traffic signal poles & related products; vegetation management; and portable toilet rentals as needed.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
24 LIBRARY & CULTURAL SERVICES
RENTAL INCOME - - (23,931) - - - 23,931 [62]
REVENUE - - (23,931) - - - 23,931
SALARIES AND WAGES 3,303,279 3,303,279 2,355,253 - 71% 71% 948,026 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 2,272,224 2,272,224 1,549,829 - 68% 68% 722,395 PROF & ADMIN 647,553 652,460 380,863 106,931 75% 58% 164,667 [63] OTHER OPERATING 53,475 54,464 29,551 18,562 88% 54% 6,352 [64] UTILITIES 37,800 37,800 15,959 16,297 85% 42% 5,544 [65] EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 400 4,400 - - 0% 0% 4,400
COST POOL 559,268 559,268 419,450 - 75% 75% 139,818
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 20,000 11,869 - - 0% 0% 11,869
GRANT EXPENDITURES - 3,234 - - 0% 0% 3,234
EXPENDITURE 6,893,999 6,898,999 4,750,904 141,789 71% 69% 2,006,305 25 COMMUNITY SERVICES
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (563,950) (563,950) (434,706) - 77% 77% (129,244) [66] OTHER REVENUE (37,350) (37,350) (47,070) - 126% 126% 9,720 RENTAL INCOME (584,400) (584,400) (605,624) - 104% 104% 21,224 REVENUE (1,185,700) (1,185,700) (1,087,401) - 92% 92% (98,299) SALARIES AND WAGES 4,487,978 4,408,463 2,998,909 - 68% 68% 1,409,554 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 2,455,337 2,455,337 1,750,111 - 71% 71% 705,226 PROF & ADMIN 634,731 640,540 95,040 92,069 29% 15% 453,432 OTHER OPERATING 216,855 294,828 90,559 34,625 42% 31% 169,644 UTILITIES 43,700 45,806 19,580 20,659 88% 43% 5,567 [67] EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 6,000 6,000 - - 0% 0% 6,000
COST POOL 1,211,359 1,211,359 908,518 - 75% 75% 302,841 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 13,573 20,200 13,467 - 67% 67% 6,733 GRANT EXPENDITURES 14,515 14,515 (1,297) - -9% -9% 15,812 [68] EXPENDITURE 9,084,048 9,097,048 5,874,887 147,353 66% 65% 3,074,809 NOTES:
[62] Richmond Art Center rental fees are not budgeted.
[64] PO encumbered with Ricoh USA Inc. for copier lease. [65] PO encumbered contract with T-Mobile, Inc. for communications and media. [66] Recreation program fees are slightly under budget for some locations. [67] PO encumbered with Comcast for internet service. [68] Received credit for I Heart Rep Services franchise project reimbursement. [63] Multiple PO's encumbered for: books; audiobooks; magazines; integrated circulation and acquisition platform; OCLC cataloging subscriptions; and Playaway branded products including launchpads and wonder books.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
26 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
OTHER REVENUE - - (5,856) - - - 5,856 [69]
REVENUE - - (5,856) - - - 5,856
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,210,255 1,210,255 863,126 - 71% 71% 347,129 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 679,609 679,609 446,076 - 66% 66% 233,533 PROF & ADMIN 1,668,752 1,713,186 1,164,987 98,793 74% 68% 449,406 OTHER OPERATING 121,945 121,945 41,386 68,767 90% 34% 11,792 [70] UTILITIES 417,100 417,100 511,315 23,960 128% 123% (118,175) [71] EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 2,262,331 2,262,331 949,849 110,115 47% 42% 1,202,367 COST POOL 102,792 102,792 77,094 - 75% 75% 25,698
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,033,473 1,333,103 360,622 359,672 54% 27% 612,809 A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (408,867) (408,867) (306,648) - 75% 75% (102,219) EXPENDITURE 7,087,390 7,431,454 4,107,807 661,307 64% 55% 2,662,339 36 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRM
OTHER TAXES (1,803,154) (1,803,154) (1,086,431) - 60% 60% (716,723) [73] OPER XFERS IN (86,778) (934,641) (912,951) - 98% 98% (21,690) [74] REVENUE (1,889,932) (2,737,795) (2,006,570) - 73% 73% (731,225) SALARIES AND WAGES 1,195,070 1,175,070 697,474 - 59% 59% 477,595 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 439,734 439,734 296,181 - 67% 67% 143,553 PROF & ADMIN 2,065,341 3,125,004 896,198 281,023 38% 29% 1,947,783 OTHER OPERATING 62,500 70,700 3,419 2,300 8% 5% 64,981
UTILITIES 14,900 14,900 3,990 - 27% 27% 10,910
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 1,000 1,000 119 - 12% 12% 881
PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 1,500 1,500 - - 0% 0% 1,500
COST POOL 46,555 46,555 34,918 - 75% 75% 11,637
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 344 - - - (344) [75]
EXPENDITURE 3,826,600 4,874,463 1,932,645 283,323 45% 40% 2,658,495 NOTES:
[69] Received from Richmond Museum Association for copy center charges and Misc. revenue for Extenet Systems annual license fee. [70] PO encumbered with Ricoh USA Inc. for copier lease and equipment. [72] PO's encumbered with AT&T Internet Services and T-Mobile for phone services. [73] Revenues are not received equally monthly.
[74] Transfer-in for Art Initiative $250,000, Small Business Support $597,863, and a portion for staff salary (on a monthly basis). [75] Payment for office chair.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
37 INTERNAL SERVICES PROGRAM
SALARIES AND WAGES 148,434 148,434 - - 0% 0% 148,434 [76] PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 78,986 78,986 5,989 - 8% 8% 72,996 [76] COST POOL 13,335 13,335 10,002 - 75% 75% 3,333
EXPENDITURE 240,754 240,754 15,991 - 7% 7% 224,763
38 TRANSPORTATION OPERATION
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (30,000) (30,000) (17,687) - 59% 59% (12,313) [77] CHARGES FOR SERVICES (200) (200) (10,194) - 5097% 5097% 9,994 [77] REVENUE (30,200) (30,200) (27,881) - 92% 92% (2,319)
SALARIES AND WAGES 42,554 42,554 59,504 - 140% 140% (16,950) [78] PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (14,113) (14,113) 38,446 - -272% -272% (52,559) [78] PROF & ADMIN 10,500 12,500 - - 0% 0% 12,500
OTHER OPERATING 17,200 15,200 320 - 2% 2% 14,880
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 6,600 6,600 - - 0% 0% 6,600
COST POOL 11,853 11,853 8,889 - 75% 75% 2,964
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 500 500 - - 0% 0% 500
EXPENDITURE 75,094 75,094 107,159 - 143% 143% (32,065)
40 COMMUNITY CRISIS RESPONSE PROGRAM
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,204,919 1,222,919 191,487 - 16% 16% 1,031,432 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 700,832 700,832 87,805 - 13% 13% 613,027 PROF & ADMIN 1,000,000 569,500 3,363 26,400 5% 1% 539,737 OTHER OPERATING - 30,800 10,703 - 35% 35% 20,097
UTILITIES - 10,000 - - 0% 0% 10,000
COST POOL - 50,000 - - 0% 0% 50,000 [79]
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY - 321,700 108,300 9,953 37% 34% 203,447 EXPENDITURE 2,905,751 2,905,751 401,658 36,353 15% 14% 2,467,740 NOTES:
[76] The Sr. Management Analyst position is currently vacant. [77] Revenues are not received equally monthly.
[78] The contra reduction for staff working on grants.
[79] Revised budget is part of set-up for CCRP. Will look into what it is for and why no actuals to-date.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
91 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
PROPERTY TAXES (57,597,487) (57,597,487) (29,333,660) - 51% 51% (28,263,827) [80] SALES & USE TAX (60,456,550) (60,901,150) (33,489,349) - 55% 55% (27,411,801) [81] UTILITY USERS TAX (62,092,359) (62,092,359) (47,157,840) - 76% 76% (14,934,519) OTHER TAXES (21,602,243) (21,602,243) (13,340,255) - 62% 62% (8,261,988) [81] LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (13,752,620) (13,852,620) (10,867,899) - 78% 78% (2,984,721) [81] FINES & FORFEITURES (126,438) (126,438) (83,027) - 66% 66% (43,411) [81] USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (1,796,421) (1,796,421) (2,408,691) - 134% 134% 612,270 [82] CHARGES FOR SERVICES (132,000) (132,000) (158) - 0% 0% (131,842) [83] OTHER REVENUE (60,480) (60,480) (172,671) - 286% 286% 112,191 [83] RENTAL INCOME (175,078) (175,078) (137,468) - 79% 79% (37,610) [83] INTERGOV STATE TAXES (125,000) (125,000) (182,741) - 146% 146% 57,741 [84] INTERGOV STATE GRANT (100,000) (100,000) (158,335) - 158% 158% 58,335 [85] LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (40,400) (40,400) - - 0% 0% (40,400) [86] OPER XFERS IN (22,334,761) (22,334,761) (22,334,761) - 100% 100% - [87] REVENUE (240,391,837) (240,936,437) (159,666,855) - 66% 66% (81,269,582) NOTES:
[80] Property tax assessments are received in December, April and June. [81] Revenues are not received equally monthly.
[82] Realized gain on interest and interest on the pooled cash. [83] Revenues are not received equally monthly.
[84] Motor Vehicle Fees for prior year came in higher than budget. [85] Received unexpected large SB90 monies from the State of CA. [86] Budget is for Housing & Community Development Department outstanding loans associated with disallowed cost by HUD. [87] Completed PTORS transfer-in for the year.

Attachment 1 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - General Fund by Department

FUNDS ORIGINAL APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET
YTD ACTUAL as of
March 31, 2025 ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
SALARIES AND WAGES (2,967,192) (2,967,192) 2,250,000 - -76% -76% (5,217,192) [88] PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 467,198 467,198 4,833,887 - 1035% 1035% (4,366,689) [89] PROF & ADMIN 1,051,500 2,109,000 883,733 118,484 48% 42% 1,106,783 OTHER OPERATING 1,120,000 1,001,500 134,296 17,202 15% 13% 850,002 EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS - - 22,557 20 - - (22,577) [90]
COST POOL 5,275,626 5,275,626 3,956,721 - 75% 75% 1,318,905 A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (563,845) (563,845) (422,884) - 75% 75% (140,961) OPER XFERS OUT 20,231,354 33,125,492 23,790,349 - 72% 72% 9,335,142 [91] EXPENDITURE 24,614,641 38,447,779 35,448,660 135,706 93% 92% 2,863,413 GF - REVENUE (248,935,372) (250,327,835) (166,669,697) - 67% 67% (83,658,139) GF - EXPENDITURE 248,935,372 266,672,389 180,529,826 7,362,887 70% 68% 78,779,675 GF - GRAND TOTAL - 16,344,554 13,860,130 7,362,887 130% 85% (4,878,463) NOTES:
[88] Budgeted salary savings contra of $5.97M.
[89] Budgeted benefit savings contras of $4.5M.
[90] Payment to Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC for Civic Center Planting Renovation Plan. [91] Transfer-out completed for paving program, Kids Initiative, and Sea Level Rise consultant.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES

OTHER OPERATING FUNDS
1003 TRANSPORTATION OPERATION
OTHER REVENUE (20,000) (20,000) (7,515) - 38% 38% (12,485) [1] INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (840,000) (840,000) (1,098,645) - 131% 131% 258,645 [2] REVENUE (860,000) (860,000) (1,106,160) - 129% 129% 246,160SALARIES AND WAGES 281,112 281,112 199,781 - 71% 71% 81,331 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 342,767 342,767 255,189 - 74% 74% 87,578 PROF & ADMIN 10,000 10,000 - - 0% 0% 10,000
OTHER OPERATING 7,900 7,900 2,530 2,363 62% 32% 3,007UTILITIES 2,500 2,500 1,136 - 45% 45% 1,364COST POOL 677,198 677,198 507,899 - 75% 75% 169,299 EXPENDITURE 1,321,476 1,321,476 966,535 2,363 73% 73% 352,579 1012 HILLTOP LANDSCAPE MAINT DIST
PROPERTY TAXES (1,158,332) (1,158,332) (637,764) - 55% 55% (520,568) [2a] USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - 4 - - 100% (4)
OPER XFERS IN (243,068) (243,068) (182,303) - 75% 75% (60,765) REVENUE (1,401,400) (1,401,400) (820,063) - 59% 59% (581,337)SALARIES AND WAGES 599,218 599,218 471,093 - 79% 79% 128,125 [3] PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 387,899 387,899 326,671 - 84% 84% 61,227 [4] PROF & ADMIN 40,000 40,000 11,300 - 28% 28% 28,700OTHER OPERATING 77,900 77,900 34,151 3,019 48% 44% 40,730UTILITIES 101,000 101,000 89,979 - 89% 89% 11,021 [5] EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 75,000 75,000 48,427 8,432 76% 65% 18,141 [6]COST POOL 116,115 116,115 87,087 - 75% 75% 29,028 EXPENDITURE 1,397,132 1,397,132 1,068,709 11,451 77% 76% 316,972 1015 MARINA BAY LNDSCP & LIGHT DIST
PROPERTY TAXES (730,810) (730,810) (404,840) - 55% 55% (325,970) [7] USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (22,303) - - - 22,303
OPER XFERS IN (490,599) (490,599) (367,953) - 75% 75% (122,646) REVENUE (1,221,409) (1,221,409) (795,097) - 65% 65% (426,312) NOTES[1] Revenues are not received equally monthly.[2] Received prior year Measure J funding from Contra Costa Transportation[2a] Property taxes are received in December, April, and June.[3] Part-time salaries are higher than anticipated[4] OPEB and Worker's Comp were not budgeted[5] EBMUD water bill was higher than anticipated[6] PO Encumbered for Hilltop Yard lease[7] Property taxes are received in December, April, and June.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
SALARIES AND WAGES 455,467 455,467 298,073 - 65% 65% 157,394 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 233,309 233,309 180,204 - 77% 77% 53,105 [8] PROF & ADMIN 63,503 49,847 21,213 13,600 70% 43% 15,034OTHER OPERATING 80,000 80,000 8,857 - 11% 11% 71,143UTILITIES 255,000 255,000 152,163 - 60% 60% 102,837 EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS - - 15,612 - - - (15,612) [9]COST POOL 90,661 90,661 67,996 - 75% 75% 22,665ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 13,656 - 12,961 695 100% 95% - [10] EXPENDITURE 1,177,940 1,177,940 757,078 14,295 65% 64% 406,567 1050 CR-PLANNING & BUILDING
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (7,227,283) (7,227,283) (5,926,410) - 82% 82% (1,300,873) USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (82,307) (82,307) (253,210) - 308% 308% 170,903 CHARGES FOR SERVICES (2,754,000) (2,754,000) (1,408,737) - 51% 51% (1,345,263) [11] OTHER REVENUE (50) (50) (2,725) - 5450% 5450% 2,675
INTERGOV FED GRANT (750,000) (847,500) - - 0% 0% (847,500) [12]INTERGOV STATE GRANT (183,099) (183,099) - - 0% 0% (183,099) [12]INTERGOV OTHER GRANT - - (15,000) - - 100% 15,000 [13]OPER XFERS IN (1,000,000) (2,000,000) (1,520,000) - 76% 76% (480,000) REVENUE (11,996,739) (13,094,239) (9,126,082) - 70% 70% (3,968,157)SALARIES AND WAGES 3,821,572 3,821,572 2,200,419 - 58% 58% 1,621,153 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 1,967,034 1,967,034 1,238,043 - 63% 63% 728,991 PROF & ADMIN 6,596,755 8,858,572 2,312,529 3,135,339 61% 26% 3,410,705 OTHER OPERATING 188,401 188,401 29,312 8,206 20% 16% 150,883 UTILITIES 9,000 9,000 4,884 - 54% 54% 4,116
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 11,409 12,641 8,691 - 69% 69% 3,950COST POOL 2,276,289 2,276,289 1,707,225 - 75% 75% 569,064ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 501,500 501,500 - - 0% 0% 501,500 EXPENDITURE 15,371,960 17,635,008 7,501,103 3,143,545 60% 43% 6,990,360NOTES[8] Unemployment Insurance higher than anticipated [9] Paid fuel and labor recharge expenses. Will transfer budget.[10] Paid irrigation system upgrade. [11] Revenues are not received equally monthly[12] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs[13] Received revenue for The Tides Center of the Homekey application

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
1205 EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING
OTHER REVENUE - - (10,000) - - 100% 10,000 [14]INTERGOV FED GRANT (3,169,355) (3,169,355) (339,352) - 11% 11% (2,830,003) [15] INTERGOV STATE GRANT (2,500,000) (2,500,000) (1,453,358) - 58% 58% (1,046,642) [15] INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (110,000) (110,000) (20,000) - 18% 18% (90,000) [15] OPER XFERS IN (2,756,777) (2,756,777) (970,594) - 35% 35% (1,786,184) [16] REVENUE (8,536,132) (8,536,132) (2,793,303) - 33% 33% (5,742,829)SALARIES AND WAGES 1,666,767 1,666,767 724,271 - 43% 43% 942,496 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 1,857,316 1,857,316 898,943 - 48% 48% 958,373PROF & ADMIN 54,000 54,483 21,557 1,332 42% 40% 31,593OTHER OPERATING 53,000 53,000 29,432 32,481 117% 56% (8,913) [17]UTILITIES 7,500 7,881 5,464 2,224 98% 69% 192 [18] EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 679,790 1,094,121 385,096 252,754 58% 35% 456,270 COST POOL 701,777 701,777 526,328 - 75% 75% 175,449
GRANT EXPENDITURES 4,715,554 4,868,126 1,788,452 44,769 38% 37% 3,034,905 EMPLMT & TRNG ALLOC (1,199,572) (1,307,375) 0 - 0% 0% (1,307,375)EXPENDITURE 8,536,132 8,996,096 4,379,545 333,561 52% 49% 4,282,990 4006 STORMWATER
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (75,000) (75,000) (12,540) - 17% 17% (62,460) [19] FINES & FORFEITURES - - (500) - - 100% 500
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (21,221) - - 100% 21,221
CHARGES FOR SERVICES (1,930,300) (1,930,300) (1,119,116) - 58% 58% (811,184) [20] RENTAL INCOME (4,380) (4,380) (4,056) - 93% 93% (324)
INTERGOV STATE GRANT (1,498,664) (1,498,664) (576,224) - 38% 38% (922,440) [21] REVENUE (3,508,344) (3,508,344) (1,733,657) - 49% 49% (1,774,687)SALARIES AND WAGES 127,195 132,295 39,926 - 30% 30% 92,369 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 57,468 57,468 16,499 - 29% 29% 40,969PROF & ADMIN 1,584,583 1,966,978 888,847 1,038,898 98% 45% 39,232 [22] OTHER OPERATING - - 1 - - 100% (1)
UTILITIES 45,000 39,900 15,183 - 38% 38% 24,717EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 73,795 130,594 - 56,799 43% 0% 73,795 COST POOL 90,530 90,530 67,898 - 75% 75% 22,632ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,219,802 723,796 794,219 241,306 85% 65% 184,278 [23] EXPENDITURE 2,702,367 3,637,567 1,822,573 1,337,003 87% 50% 477,991TOTAL OTHER OPERATING FUNDS REVENUES (28,621,524) (27,524,024) (16,374,361) - 57% 57% (12,247,163)TOTAL OTHER OPERATING FUNDS EXPENDITURES 34,165,219 30,507,007 16,495,543 4,842,217 62% 48% 17,669,676TOTAL OTHER OPERATING FUNDS 5,543,695 2,982,982 121,182 4,842,217 90% 2% 5,422,513NOTES[14] Received donation for Richmond Build [15] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs.[16] Operating transfers do not occur monthly. [17] PO encumbered for Ricoh copier lease.[18] Encumbered internet service from Comcast. [19] Revenues are not received equally monthly.[20] Revenues are not received equally monthly. [21] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs.[22] Encumbered professional services for Rheem Creek invoices. [23] Encumbered invoices for water capture facility at Marina Pkwy.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
1001 SECURED PENSION OVERRIDE
PROPERTY TAXES (28,502,143) (28,502,143) (15,634,653) - 55% 55% (12,867,490) [24] REVENUE (28,502,143) (28,502,143) (15,634,653) - 55% 55% (12,867,490)OPER XFERS OUT 28,502,143 28,502,143 28,502,143 - 100% 100% 0 [25] EXPENDITURE 28,502,143 28,502,143 28,502,143 - 100% 100% 0 1005 LIBRARY FUND
FINES & FORFEITURES - - (4,674) - - 100% 4,674USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (149,463) - - 100% 149,463 OTHER REVENUE (5,834) (5,834) - - 0% 0% (5,834) [26]INTERGOV FED GRANT (71,796) (71,796) (39,081) - 54% 54% (32,715) [27]INTERGOV STATE GRANT (1,170,828) (1,170,828) (44,354) - 4% 4% (1,126,474) [27] INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (69,990) (69,990) (11,807) - 17% 17% (58,183) [27]REVENUE (1,318,448) (1,318,448) (249,379) - 19% 19% (1,069,068)PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT - 7,072 - - 0% 0% 7,072PROF & ADMIN 270,000 260,928 15,192 - 6% 6% 245,736 OTHER OPERATING 29,800 29,800 3,348 - 11% 11% 26,452
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 691,456 70,000 432,107 189,349 90% 62% 70,000 [28] GRANT EXPENDITURES 38,834 40,834 6,752 17,000 58% 17% 17,082EXPENDITURE 408,634 1,030,089 457,398 206,349 64% 45% 366,343 1007 EMERGENCY MED SERV
PROPERTY TAXES (215,586) (215,586) - - 0% 0% (215,586) [29]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (2,511) - - 100% 2,511 REVENUE (215,586) (215,586) (2,511) - 1% 1% (213,075)
PROF & ADMIN 103,100 103,100 - 159 0% 0% 102,941OTHER OPERATING 38,486 38,486 16,624 - 43% 43% 21,862EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 74,000 74,000 74,000 - 100% 100% - [30]EXPENDITURE 215,586 215,586 90,624 159 42% 42% 124,802 1009 VEOLIA MITIGATION
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (25,000) (25,000) (18,750) - 75% 75% (6,250)USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (10,382) - - 100% 10,382 REVENUE (25,000) (25,000) (29,132) - 117% 117% 4,132
PROF & ADMIN 100,000 100,000 - - 0% 0% 100,000EXPENDITURE 100,000 100,000 - - 0% 0% 100,000 NOTES[24] Property taxes are received in December, April, and June. [25] Made majority of PTORS transfer to General Fund and 2022 POB.[26] Revenue is not received equally monthly.[28] Encumbrance for architectural designs for Library remodel. [29] Property taxes are received in December, April, and June.[30] Shared cost for EBRCS radios [27] Revenues are received after expenditures occur.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
1010 N.RICHMOND WASTE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (150,040) (150,040) - - 0% 0% (150,040) [31]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - 32 - - 100% (32) REVENUE (150,040) (150,040) 32 - 0% 0% (150,072)PROF & ADMIN 83,000 83,000 - - 0% 0% 83,000 OTHER OPERATING 35,540 35,540 125 - 0% 0% 35,415UTILITIES 6,500 6,500 1,072 689 27% 16% 4,739 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 68 - - 100% (68) [32]
EXPENDITURE 125,040 125,040 1,265 689 2% 1% 123,086
1011 OUTSIDE FUNDED SVCS - DONATION
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (213) - - 100% 213REVENUE - - (213) - - 100% 213 1017 CHEVRON MODERNIZATN PROJ & CIA
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (519,889) - - 100% 519,889 [33] REVENUE - - (519,889) - - 100% 519,889PROF & ADMIN 9,536,533 10,468,992 1,003,378 2,049,355 29% 10% 7,416,260 OTHER OPERATING 335,048 337,098 8,920 - 3% 3% 328,178
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 1,118,000 1,123,950 45,395 859,822 81% 4% 218,732 [34] ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 111,000 524,320 18,981 48,997 13% 4% 456,341 GRANT EXPENDITURES 50,000 50,000 - - 0% 0% 50,000
EXPENDITURE 11,150,581 12,504,360 1,076,674 2,958,175 32% 9% 8,469,511 1018 RENT CONTROL
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (3,299,011) (3,289,011) (2,694,465) - 82% 82% (594,546) USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (50,000) (50,000) (64,023) - 128% 128% 14,023OTHER REVENUE (50,000) (50,000) (66) - 0% 0% (49,934) [35] OPER XFERS IN (290,391) (290,391) (217,791) - 75% 75% (72,600) REVENUE (3,689,402) (3,679,402) (2,976,344) - 81% 81% (703,057)SALARIES AND WAGES 1,900,425 1,900,425 1,397,104 - 74% 74% 503,321PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 1,005,294 1,005,294 719,598 - 72% 72% 285,696PROF & ADMIN 387,606 377,606 154,510 132,544 76% 41% 90,552 [36]OTHER OPERATING 77,300 77,300 24,628 4,751 38% 32% 47,922UTILITIES 500 500 - - 0% 0% 500PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 9,500 9,500 9,114 86 97% 96% 300 [37] COST POOL 208,776 208,776 156,582 - 75% 75% 52,194
EXPENDITURE 3,589,402 3,579,402 2,461,537 137,380 73% 69% 980,485NOTES[31] Revenue is not received equally monthly [32] Encumbered waste disposal services. Budget transfer will be completed.[33] Interest earned on the pooled cash. [34] Encumbered expenses for solar installations for income qualified applicants[35] Revenues are not received equally monthly. [36] Encumbered legal services from Collective Legal Services[37] Encumbrance for Insurance Services.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
1055 ENCROACHMENT SVCS
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (890,000) (890,000) (722,073) - 81% 81% (167,927)USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (107,294) - - 100% 107,294 CHARGES FOR SERVICES (300,000) (300,000) (318,354) - 106% 106% 18,354 REVENUE (1,190,000) (1,190,000) (1,147,721) - 96% 96% (42,279)SALARIES AND WAGES 535,438 535,438 263,166 - 49% 49% 272,272 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 371,861 371,861 188,222 - 51% 51% 183,639 PROF & ADMIN 45,100 45,100 9,701 299 22% 22% 35,100
OTHER OPERATING 17,040 17,040 286 314 4% 2% 16,440
UTILITIES 3,016 3,016 2,663 - 88% 88% 353 [38]
COST POOL 181,992 181,992 136,494 - 75% 75% 45,498
EXPENDITURE 1,154,448 1,154,448 600,534 613 52% 52% 553,301 1303 KIDS FIRST INITIATIVE
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (279,386) - - 100% 279,386
OPER XFERS IN (7,575,272) (7,575,272) (5,681,453) - 75% 75% (1,893,819) REVENUE (7,575,272) (7,575,272) (5,960,839) - 79% 79% (1,614,433)SALARIES AND WAGES 532,472 537,472 321,494 - 60% 60% 215,978 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 282,725 282,725 149,322 - 53% 53% 133,403 PROF & ADMIN 6,162,441 6,157,566 1,939,607 662,833 42% 31% 3,555,126OTHER OPERATING 26,000 25,950 5,950 3,162 35% 23% 16,838EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS - 50 50 - 100% 100% - [39] COST POOL 2,963 2,963 2,222 - 75% 75% 741
EXPENDITURE 7,006,601 7,006,726 2,418,645 665,995 44% 35% 3,922,086 1304 EMERGENCY OPE & DISASTR RECVRY
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (4,512) - - 100% 4,512OPER XFERS IN (75,000) (75,000) - - 0% 0% (75,000) [40] REVENUE (75,000) (75,000) (4,512) - 6% 6% (70,488)
PROF & ADMIN - 144,750 - 3,200 2% 0% 141,550
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 8,450 - 8,450 - 100% 100% -
EXPENDITURE - 153,200 8,450 3,200 8% 6% 141,550
1305 PUBLIC ART
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (400,000) (400,000) (391,959) - 98% 98% (8,041)USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (89,117) - - 100% 89,117 REVENUE (400,000) (400,000) (481,076) - 120% 120% 81,076SALARIES AND WAGES 37,000 43,000 - - 0% 0% 43,000 PROF & ADMIN 1,316,063 1,560,063 64,406 79,476 9% 4% 1,416,182 OTHER OPERATING 11,046 11,046 5,586 - 51% 51% 5,460
EXPENDITURE 1,364,109 1,614,109 69,991 79,476 9% 4% 1,464,642 NOTES[38] Paid Verizon wireless expenses[39] Paid service for shredding[40] Transfer-in for emergency operations is posted after expense occurs.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
1306 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (604,019) - - 100% 604,019 [41] REVENUE - - (604,019) - - 100% 604,019PROF & ADMIN 5,449,233 5,491,157 1,280,189 2,167,139 63% 23% 2,043,828 OTHER OPERATING - 0 - - 0% 0% 0
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 15,193,726 10,127,761 3,204,845 4,881,957 53% 21% 7,106,924 GRANT EXPENDITURES 250,000 110,000 110,000 - 100% 100% - [42] EXPENDITURE 15,826,994 20,794,883 4,595,034 7,049,097 56% 22% 9,150,752 1307 TRANSFORMATIVE CLIMATE GRANT
INTERGOV STATE GRANT (15,266,250) (15,416,250) (1,210,766) - 8% 8% (14,205,484) [43] REVENUE (15,266,250) (15,416,250) (1,210,766) - 8% 8% (14,205,484)PROF & ADMIN 10,095,957 13,076,718 1,838,179 4,619,307 49% 14% 6,619,232 OTHER OPERATING - 12,000 1,728 - 14% 14% 10,272UTILITIES - 2,500 793 - 32% 32% 1,707ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 5,079,027 4,726,873 38,811 326,116 7% 1% 4,714,100 EXPENDITURE 14,822,830 18,170,244 1,879,512 4,945,422 38% 10% 11,345,310 1308 ENCAMPMENT RESOLUTION FUND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (91,975) - - 100% 91,975
INTERGOV STATE GRANT (4,301,294) (4,301,294) (1,398,935) - 33% 33% (2,902,358) [43] REVENUE (4,301,294) (4,301,294) (1,490,911) - 35% 35% (2,810,383)PROF & ADMIN 3,876,294 7,143,257 1,397,364 3,418,965 67% 20% 2,326,927 OTHER OPERATING 400,000 400,000 626 - 0% 0% 399,374
UTILITIES 25,000 48,182 945 22,237 48% 2% 25,000
EXPENDITURE 4,301,294 7,591,439 1,398,935 3,441,202 64% 18% 2,751,301 1309 ENCAMPMENT RESOLUTION FUND-3-R
INTERGOV STATE GRANT - (9,336,746) - - 0% 0% (9,336,746)REVENUE - (9,336,746) - - 0% 0% (9,336,746)PROF & ADMIN - 9,336,746 - - 0% 0% 9,336,746EXPENDITURE - 9,336,746 - - 0% 0% 9,336,746 1405 HOMEKEY PROGRAM, NOFA, ROUND 3
INTERGOV STATE GRANT - (14,512,660) - - 0% 0% (14,512,660) [44]REVENUE - (14,512,660) - - 0% 0% (14,512,660) PROF & ADMIN - 14,512,660 - - 0% 0% 14,512,660
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 50,000 - - 100% (50,000) [45]
EXPENDITURE - 14,512,660 50,000 - 0% 0% 14,462,660TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS REVENUES (86,697,840) (62,708,434) (30,311,934) - 35% 35% (56,385,906)TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS EXPENDITURES 126,391,07 88,567,660 43,610,742 4 19,487,756 50% 35% 82,780,332 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 39,693,235 25,859,226 13,298,808 19,487,756 83% 34% 26,394,427NOTES[41] Interest earned on the pooled cash. [42] Paid grant expenses for Youthworks[43] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs. [44] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs.[45] Will complete budget transfer for expenses for Motel 6 in March.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
1002 STATE GAS TAX
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (60,897) - - 100% 60,897
INTERGOV STATE TAXES (3,173,758) (3,173,758) (2,248,163) - 71% 71% (925,595) [46] REVENUE (3,173,758) (3,173,758) (2,309,060) - 73% 73% (864,699)PROF & ADMIN 35,360 35,360 - - 0% 0% 35,360 EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 1,000,000 1,000,000 750,000 - 75% 75% 250,000ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,484,692 2,262,398 1,002,821 857,473 75% 40% 624,398 EXPENDITURE 3,297,758 3,520,052 1,752,821 857,473 74% 50% 909,758 1004 ASSET SEIZURE FUND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (7,786) - - 100% 7,786
CHARGES FOR SERVICES - - 3,085 - - - (3,085)REVENUE - - (4,701) - - 100% 4,701 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 170,000 170,000 - - 0% 0% 170,000
EXPENDITURE 170,000 170,000 - - 0% 0% 170,000
1006 OUTSIDE FUNDED SVCS - GRANTS
INTERGOV FED GRANT - (3,117,500) - - 0% 0% (3,117,500) [47] INTERGOV STATE GRANT (24,764,457) (25,510,126) (3,791,490) - 15% 15% (21,718,636) [47] INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (340,915) (452,503) (597,414) - 132% 132% 144,911 [47]REVENUE (25,105,372) (29,080,129) (4,388,904) - 15% 15% (24,691,225)SALARIES AND WAGES - 16,658 - - 0% 0% 16,658 PROF & ADMIN 4,887,553 9,100,810 1,754,231 3,318,251 56% 19% 4,028,327 OTHER OPERATING 8,265 17,705 869 - 5% 5% 16,837UTILITIES 19,042 19,042 - - 0% 0% 19,042 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 7,429,480 13,044,308 2,318,327 7,655,433 76% 18% 3,070,549 [48] GRANT EXPENDITURES 1,727,516 1,763,932 671,419 - 38% 38% 1,092,513 EXPENDITURE 14,071,856 23,962,455 4,744,845 10,973,684 66% 20% 8,243,926 1054 ENGINEERING GRANTS
INTERGOV FED GRANT (3,815,000) (5,135,000) (49,738) - 1% 1% (5,085,262) [49] INTERGOV STATE GRANT (19,120,726) (19,120,726) (2,290,814) - 12% 12% (16,829,913) [49] INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (100,000) (278,400) - - 0% 0% (278,400) [49]REVENUE (23,035,726) (24,534,126) (2,340,552) - 10% 10% (22,193,574)ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 25,591,084 17,123,837 4,784,119 4,253,773 35% 19% 16,553,192 EXPENDITURE 17,123,837 25,591,084 4,784,119 4,253,773 35% 19% 16,553,192 NOTES[47] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs.[49] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs[48] Encumbered expenses related to the Richmond Communities Clean Collaboration Project[46] Gas Tax revenue has a month lag time. Revenue will not be received equally monthly.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
1019 ROAD MAINT & REHAB ACCT (RMRA)
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (144,145) - - 100% 144,145
INTERGOV STATE TAXES (2,966,001) (2,966,001) (2,123,286) - 72% 72% (842,715) [50] REVENUE (2,966,001) (2,966,001) (2,267,431) - 76% 76% (698,570)ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 6,911,061 5,871,845 2,696,856 414,696 45% 39% 3,799,509 EXPENDITURE 5,871,845 6,911,061 2,696,856 414,696 45% 39% 3,799,509 2001 GENERAL CAPITAL FUND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (1,458,993) - - 100% 1,458,993 [51]OPER XFERS IN (8,182,000) (20,076,138) (15,504,634) - 77% 77% (4,571,504) REVENUE (8,182,000) (20,076,138) (16,963,627) - 84% 84% (3,112,511)PROF & ADMIN 93,098 837,476 130,267 561,946 83% 16% 145,264 [52] EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS - 633,090 3,064 124,879 20% 0% 505,148 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 39,624,185 23,418,836 2,157,894 3,333,781 14% 5% 34,132,511 OPER XFERS OUT - 847,863 847,863 - 100% 100% - [53]
EXPENDITURE 23,511,934 41,942,615 3,139,087 4,020,605 17% 7% 34,782,923 2002 MEASURE J
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (103,590) - - 100% 103,590
INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (1,527,861) (1,527,861) (2,247,953) - 147% 147% 720,092 [54] REVENUE (1,527,861) (1,527,861) (2,351,543) - 154% 154% 823,682PROF & ADMIN 200,000 200,000 195,213 - 98% 98% 4,787 [55] ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,722,280 3,176,727 390,530 503,681 28% 12% 2,282,517 EXPENDITURE 2,922,280 3,376,727 585,743 503,681 32% 17% 2,287,304 2007 HARBOR FUND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (1,441) - - 100% 1,441
REVENUE - - (1,441) - - 100% 1,441
2110 IMPACT FEE - PARKS
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (24,192) - - 100% 24,192 [56]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (5,708) - 100% 5,708 REVENUE - - (29,900) - - 100% 29,900
NOTES[50] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs. [51] Interest earned on the pooled cash. [52] Encumbered professional services for Pt. Molate Project. [53] Completed transfer out for Art Initiative and Small Business Support[54] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs.[55] Paid membership dues to West Contra Costa Transportation[56] Impact Fee revenue is adjusted at mid-year

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
2111 IMPACT FEE - TRAFFIC
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (114,144) - - 100% 114,144 [56]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (52,847) - - 100% 52,847 REVENUE - - (166,991) - - 100% 166,991ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY - 29,608 - 29,608 100% 0% - EXPENDITURE - 29,608 - 29,608 100% 0% -
2113 IMPACT FEE - FIRE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (67,613) - - 100% 67,613 [56]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (2,034) - - 100% 2,034 REVENUE - - (69,647) - - 100% 69,647
OTHER OPERATING 65,000 65,000 - - 0% 0% 65,000
EXPENDITURE 65,000 65,000 - - 0% 0% 65,000
2114 IMPACT FEE - POLICE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (16,701) - - 100% 16,701 [56]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (20,924) - - 100% 20,924 REVENUE - - (37,625) - - 100% 37,625
2115 IMPACT FEE - COMM/AQUATC
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (71,159) - - 100% 71,159 [56]
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (22,498) - - 100% 22,498
REVENUE - - (93,657) - - 100% 93,657
2116 IMPACT FEE - PARKS/OPEN
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (294,269) - - 100% 294,269 [56]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (108,956) - - 100% 108,956 REVENUE - - (403,225) - - 100% 403,225ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 500,000 500,000 - - 0% 0% 500,000 EXPENDITURE 500,000 500,000 - - 0% 0% 500,000
2117 IMPACT FEE - LIBRARY
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (79,756) - - 100% 79,756 [56]
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (58,986) - - 100% 58,986
REVENUE - - (138,742) - - 100% 138,742PROF & ADMIN 100,000 98,684 - 15,079 15% 0% 83,605 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,698,062 1,699,378 59,945 9,671 4% 4% 1,629,762 EXPENDITURE 1,798,062 1,798,062 59,945 24,750 5% 3% 1,713,367 NOTES[56] Impact Fee revenue is adjusted at mid-year

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
2118 IMPACT FEE - HILLTOP
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (1,001) - - 100% 1,001
REVENUE - - (1,001) - - 100% 1,001
2119 IMPACT FEE - STORM DRAINAGE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (29,416) - - 100% 29,416 [56]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (34,015) - - 100% 34,015 REVENUE - - (63,431) - - 100% 63,431
2120 IMPACT FEE - WASTEWATER
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (6,243) - - 100% 6,243 [56]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (75,000) - - 100% 75,000 REVENUE - - (81,242) - - 100% 81,242ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 922,196 250,000 3,078 669,118 73% 0% 250,000 [57] EXPENDITURE 250,000 922,196 3,078 669,118 73% 0% 250,000TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS REVENUES (81,358,013) (63,990,718) (31,712,719) - 39% 39% (49,645,294)TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS EXPENDITURES 108,788,861 69,582,572 17,766,494 21,747,388 36% 16% 91,022,367TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS 27,430,848 5,591,854 (13,946,226) 21,747,388 28% -51% 41,377,073DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 3001 DS - 2005 TAXABLE POB
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (18,378) - - 100% 18,378
OPER XFERS IN (8,431,249) (8,431,249) (8,426,161) - 100% 100% (5,088) [58] REVENUE (8,431,249) (8,431,249) (8,444,539) - 100% 100% 13,290DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 8,431,249 8,431,249 8,430,699 - 100% 100% 550 [59] EXPENDITURE 8,431,249 8,431,249 8,430,699 - 100% 100% 550 3002 DS - 99A PENSION OBLIG BOND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (2,278) - - 100% 2,278
REVENUE - - (2,278) - - 100% 2,278
DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 5,500 5,500 5,317 - 97% 97% 184 [60] EXPENDITURE 5,500 5,500 5,317 - 97% 97%
NOTES[56] Impact Fee revenue is adjusted at mid-year[57] Encumbered invoices for Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements. [58] Received transfer in for pension obligation bonds[59] Paid debt service expenses for the year. [60] Paid majority of debt service for the year

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
3005 DS - 07 REFNDING&CVC CTR
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (23,940) - - 100% 23,940
CHARGES FOR SERVICES (6,247,798) (6,247,798) (4,780,708) - 77% 77% (1,467,090) OPER XFERS IN (1,482,453) (1,482,453) (1,111,833) - 75% 75% (370,620) REVENUE (7,730,251) (7,730,251) (5,916,481) - 77% 77% (1,813,770) DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 7,825,088 7,825,088 6,018,995 - 77% 77% 1,806,093 [61] EXPENDITURE 7,825,088 7,825,088 6,018,995 - 77% 77% 1,806,093TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS REVENUES (16,161,500) (16,161,500) (14,363,299) - 89% 89% (1,798,201)TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS EXPENDITURES 16,261,836 16,261,836 14,455,010 - 89% 89% 1,806,826TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 100,336 100,336 91,711 - 91% 91% 8,625ENTERPRISE FUNDS 4001 PORT OF RICHMOND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (270,652) (270,652) (614,772) - 227% 227% 344,120 OTHER REVENUE - - (532) - - 100% 532 [62]RENTAL INCOME (5,890,600) (5,890,600) (3,838,954) - 65% 65% (2,051,646) [63] INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (1,003,250) (1,003,250) - - 0% 0% (1,003,250) [64] REVENUE (7,164,502) (7,164,502) (4,454,258) - 62% 62% (2,710,244) SALARIES AND WAGES 671,422 675,122 297,850 - 44% 44% 377,272 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 309,969 309,969 147,577 - 48% 48% 162,392 PROF & ADMIN 1,640,794 2,207,794 441,328 198,824 29% 20% 1,567,642 OTHER OPERATING 11,200 11,200 4,477 4,031 76% 40% 2,692 [65]UTILITIES 487,100 487,100 348,702 1,797 72% 72% 136,602 EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 366,200 361,950 52,587 62,612 32% 15% 246,751 PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 45,000 45,000 50,356 - 112% 112% (5,356) [66]COST POOL 511,288 511,288 383,464 - 75% 75% 127,824 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 4,361,300 4,301,500 503,951 438,628 22% 12% 3,418,722 DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE - 550 550 - 100% 100% - [67]EXPENDITURE 8,344,473 8,971,273 2,230,843 705,892 33% 25% 6,034,539NOTES[61] Paid debt service expenses [62] Received unexpected revenue from Sims Metal[63] Revenues are not received equally monthly.[64] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs.[65] Encumbered Ricoh copier expense[66] Paid Alliant invoice[67] Will complete a budget transfer to cover admin fee in March.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
4003 WASTEWATER
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (28,000) (28,000) (130,702) - 467% 467% 102,702 FINES & FORFEITURES (2,000) (2,000) - - 0% 0% (2,000) [68]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (838,486) - - 100% 838,486 [69]CHARGES FOR SERVICES (30,500,000) (30,500,000) (18,523,162) - 61% 61% (11,976,838) REVENUE (30,530,000) (30,530,000) (19,492,350) - 64% 64% (11,037,650) SALARIES AND WAGES 1,893,151 1,958,151 1,067,175 - 54% 54% 890,976 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 875,602 875,602 505,193 - 58% 58% 370,409 PROF & ADMIN 13,718,462 13,734,562 6,668,294 4,169,526 79% 49% 2,896,742 [70] OTHER OPERATING 72,400 164,831 8,647 5,426 9% 5% 150,758 UTILITIES 1,547,264 1,547,264 1,109,916 - 72% 72% 437,348 EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 465,500 475,500 97,934 51,284 31% 21% 326,281 COST POOL 1,082,109 1,082,109 811,578 - 75% 75% 270,531ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 46,760,249 33,531,858 8,788,960 3,609,607 27% 19% 34,361,681 DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 9,956,258 9,956,258 9,796,135 - 98% 98% 160,123 [71] EXPENDITURE 63,142,603 76,554,524 28,853,833 7,835,843 48% 27% 39,864,847 4005 MARINA
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (164,388) - - 100% 164,388
RENTAL INCOME (450,000) (450,000) (351,044) - 78% 78% (98,956) REVENUE (450,000) (450,000) (515,432) - 115% 115% 65,432 PROF & ADMIN 912,930 913,225 18,598 178,102 22% 2% 716,525 DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 206,815 206,815 206,815 - 100% 100% - [72] OPER XFERS OUT 86,778 86,778 65,088 - 75% 75% 21,690EXPENDITURE 1,206,523 1,206,818 290,501 178,102 39% 24% 738,215 4008 KCRT - CABLE TELEVIS
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (1,250,000) (1,250,000) (393,811) - 32% 32% (856,189) [73] USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (6,052) - - 100% 6,052
OTHER REVENUE - - (500) - - 100% 500REVENUE (1,250,000) (1,250,000) (400,362) - 32% 32% (849,638) NOTES[68] Revenues are not received equally monthly.[69] Interest earned on the pooled cash. [70] Encumbered Veolia operations and maintenance for wastewater treatment plant[71] Paid 73% of debt service payment.[72] Paid debt service payment for the year[73] Revenues are not received equally monthly.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
SALARIES AND WAGES 587,896 587,896 477,771 - 81% 81% 110,125 [74]PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 316,005 316,005 245,581 - 78% 78% 70,424 [75]PROF & ADMIN 53,800 53,800 35,473 - 66% 66% 18,327OTHER OPERATING 37,721 37,721 8,945 - 24% 24% 28,776UTILITIES 5,727 5,727 2,526 2,874 94% 44% 327 [76] PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 604 604 - - 0% 0% 604COST POOL 199,699 199,699 149,773 - 75% 75% 49,926 ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 20,000 20,000 - - 0% 0% 20,000
EXPENDITURE 1,221,452 1,221,452 920,069 2,874 76% 75% 298,509TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS REVENUES (39,394,502) (39,394,502) (24,862,402) - 63% 63% (14,532,100)TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS EXPENDITURES 87,954,067 73,915,051 32,295,247 8,722,711 47% 37% 55,658,821TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 48,559,565 34,520,549 7,432,845 8,722,711 33% 15% 41,126,721INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS 5001 INSURANCE RESERVES
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (1,615,154) - - 100% 1,615,154 [77]CHARGES FOR SERVICES (27,841,923) (27,841,923) (20,881,245) - 75% 75% (6,960,679) OTHER REVENUE - - (413,228) - - 100% 413,228 [78]REVENUE (27,841,923) (27,841,923) (22,909,626) - 82% 82% (4,932,297)SALARIES AND WAGES 726,757 726,757 308,498 - 42% 42% 418,259 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 331,683 331,683 117,761 - 36% 36% 213,921 PROF & ADMIN 1,185,200 1,419,409 671,463 160,973 59% 47% 586,973 OTHER OPERATING 50,500 50,500 3,574 - 7% 7% 46,926PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 26,460,675 26,240,675 15,713,460 452,278 62% 60% 10,074,937 COST POOL 563,594 563,594 422,699 - 75% 75% 140,895
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 277,963 7,000 - 270,963 97% 0% 7,000 [79] OPER XFERS OUT 4,100,000 4,100,000 4,100,000 - 100% 100% - [80] EXPENDITURE 33,425,408 33,710,579 21,337,455 884,213 66% 63% 11,488,911NOTES[74] Part-time temp, shift differential & comp-time payout not budgeted.[75] Workers comp slightly over anticipated budget.[76] PO encumbered with Comcast for cable and internet services.[77] Interest earned on the pooled cash.[78] Will add budget at mid-year for unexpected revenue.[79] Encumbered invoices for Via Verdi Landslide.[80] One-time transfer-out for Via Verdi Mitigation Project.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
5003 EQUIPMENT SERVICES
CHARGES FOR SERVICES (5,497,245) (6,797,245) (5,097,919) - 75% 75% (1,699,326) PROC FR SLE PROP (85,000) (85,000) (8,181) - 10% 10% (76,819) [81] OPER XFERS IN (426,019) (426,019) (319,519) - 75% 75% (106,500) REVENUE (6,008,264) (7,308,264) (5,425,619) - 74% 74% (1,882,645) EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS - 80,000 80,000 - 100% 100% - [82]ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 5,985,000 9,971,354 1,298,917 2,607,826 39% 13% 6,064,610 DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 326,018 326,018 244,514 - 75% 75% 81,505 [83]EXPENDITURE 6,311,018 10,377,372 1,623,431 2,607,826 41% 16% 6,146,115 5008 COMPENSATED ABSENCES
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (71,597) - - 100% 71,597
OTHER REVENUE (3,000,000) (3,000,000) (2,250,000) - 75% 75% (750,000) REVENUE (3,000,000) (3,000,000) (2,321,597) - 77% 77% (678,403) SALARIES AND WAGES 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,762,196 - 59% 59% 1,237,804 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT - - 24,724 - - 100% (24,724) [84]EXPENDITURE 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,786,920 - 60% 60% 1,213,080TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS REVENUES (38,150,188) (36,850,188) (30,656,842) - 80% 80% (7,493,345) TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS EXPENDITURES 47,087,951 42,736,426 24,747,806 3,492,039 60% 53% 22,340,145TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS 8,937,764 5,886,238 (5,909,036) 3,492,039 -27% -66% 14,846,800HOUSING FUNDS 1200 HOUSING ADMINISTRATION
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (25,000) (25,000) (26,894) - 108% 108% 1,894 USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (50,092) (50,092) (51,033) - 102% 102% 941 OTHER REVENUE (555,713) (555,713) (573,562) - 103% 103% 17,849 REVENUE (630,805) (630,805) (651,489) - 103% 103% 20,684SALARIES AND WAGES 371,675 361,675 19,536 - 5% 5% 342,139PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 153,240 153,240 (31,550) - -21% -21% 184,789 [85]PROF & ADMIN 54,248 64,248 5,259 20,699 40% 8% 38,291OTHER OPERATING 1,909 1,909 75,493 - 3955% 3955% (73,584) [86] UTILITIES 801 801 411 - 51% 51% 390
COST POOL 122,799 122,799 92,097 - 75% 75% 30,702
EXPENDITURE 704,672 704,672 161,246 20,699 26% 23% 522,727NOTES[81] Sales of properties do not occur every month. [82] Paid for wheel alignment machine from Mohawk Lifts[83] Paid majority of debt service for the year. [84] Medical, health, and OPEB benefits were not budgeted.[85] Unexpected staff cost allocations reimbursement from Encampment R2 and EPA Grants[86] Prologis LP expense not budgeted. A budget transfer for overage was completed in March.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
1201 CDBG
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (80,475) (80,475) (10,968) - 14% 14% (69,507) LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (230,873) (230,873) (105,832) - 46% 46% (125,041) [87] REVENUE (311,348) (311,348) (116,800) - 38% 38% (194,548)SALARIES AND WAGES 13,448 - - - - - -PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 7,221 - - - - - -PROF & ADMIN 18,272 38,941 25,080 - 64% 64% 13,860OTHER OPERATING 51 51 - - 0% 0% 51COST POOL 26,923 26,923 20,194 - 75% 75% 6,729 CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 750,638 750,638 - - 0% 0% 750,638EXPENDITURE 816,553 816,553 45,274 - 6% 6% 771,278 1202 HOME PROGRAM
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (5,184) (5,184) (4,953) - 96% 96% (231) REVENUE (5,184) (5,184) (4,953) - 96% 96% (231)
1203 NEIGHBORHOOD STAB(NP)
INTERGOV OTHER GRANT - (16,600) (16,600) - 100% 100% -LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (15,000) (15,000) - - 0% 0% (15,000) [87] REVENUE (15,000) (31,600) (16,600) - 53% 53% (15,000)
SALARIES AND WAGES 13,448 - - - - --
PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 7,221 - - - - --
PROF & ADMIN 9,500 46,769 34,929 6,073 88% 75% 5,767 [88] EXPENDITURE 30,169 46,769 34,929 6,073 88% 75% 5,767
1207 COR-NEIGHBORHOOD STAB(CITY)
PROC FR SLE PROP (133,664) (133,664) - - 0% 0% (133,664) [89]REVENUE (133,664) (133,664) - - 0% 0% (133,664)OTHER OPERATING 6,753 6,753 2,377 - 35% 35% 4,376 EXPENDITURE 6,753 6,753 2,377 - 35% 35% 4,376
1208 COR-SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (121,530) (121,530) (136,536) - 112% 112% 15,006 OTHER REVENUE (64,804) (64,804) (34,999) - 54% 54% (29,805) [90]PROC FR SLE PROP (34,053) (34,053) - - 0% 0% (34,053) [91] LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (15,680) (15,680) - - 0% 0% (15,680) [92]REVENUE (236,067) (236,067) (171,535) - 73% 73% (64,532)NOTES[87] Loan/Bond proceeds are not received equally monthly [88] Encumbered tax preparation services[89] Revenues from proceeds from sales are not received equally monthly [90] Revenues are not received equally monthly.[91] Revenues from proceeds from sales are not received equally monthly[92] Loan/Bond proceeds are not received equally monthly

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
SALARIES AND WAGES 117,336 (0) - - 0% 0% (0)
PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 61,661 0 - - 0% 0% 0PROF & ADMIN 200 179,197 134,248 - 75% 75% 44,949CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - 0% 0% 1,500,000EXPENDITURE 1,679,197 1,679,197 134,248 - 8% 8% 1,544,949 1209 CAL-HOME GRANT FUND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (57,058) (57,058) (42,200) - 74% 74% (14,858) LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (134,530) (134,530) (139,885) - 104% 104% 5,355REVENUE (191,588) (191,588) (182,085) - 95% 95% (9,503)SALARIES AND WAGES 13,448 - - - - - -PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 7,221 - - - - - -PROF & ADMIN 1,200 21,869 16,941 - 77% 77% 4,927 [93] CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 395,000 395,000 - - 0% 0% 395,000
EXPENDITURE 416,869 416,869 16,941 - 4% 4% 399,927
1302 HOUSNG IN LIEU FEE - DEVELOPER
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (651,665) (651,665) (110,168) - 17% 17% (541,497) [94] USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (81,757) (81,757) (64,108) - 78% 78% (17,649) REVENUE (733,422) (733,422) (174,276) - 24% 24% (559,146)SALARIES AND WAGES 90,440 (0) - - 0% 0% (0) PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 47,220 (0) - - 0% 0% (0)
PROF & ADMIN 15,000 152,660 103,245 - 68% 68% 49,415
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 600,000 600,000 - - 0% 0% 600,000
CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 500,000 500,000 - - 0% 0% 500,000OPER XFERS OUT 480,000 480,000 - - 0% 0% 480,000EXPENDITURE 1,732,660 1,732,660 103,245 - 6% 6% 1,629,415 2125 IRON TRIANGLE/EPA PROGRAM
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (10,088) (10,088) (6,310) - 63% 63% (3,778) INTERGOV FED GRANT (434,954) (434,954) (122,043) - 28% 28% (312,910) [95] REVENUE (445,041) (445,041) (128,353) - 29% 29% (316,688) PROF & ADMIN - 10,334 10,334 - 100% 100% - [96]CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 434,954 685,062 292,137 177,957 69% 43% 214,968 EXPENDITURE 434,954 695,396 302,472 177,957 69% 43% 214,968 TOTAL HOUSING FUNDS REVENUES (2,718,720) (2,702,120) (1,446,091) - 53% 53% (1,272,628)TOTAL HOUSING FUNDS EXPENDITURES 6,098,867 5,821,825 800,732 204,728 16% 13% 5,298,136TOTAL HOUSING FUNDS 3,380,148 3,119,705 (645,360) 204,728 -13% -19% 4,025,508NOTES[93] Paid management fees to Amerinational.[94] Revenues are not received equally monthly.[95] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs.[96] Admin expense payroll allocations were not budgeted.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES

RICHMOND HOUSING AUTHORITY FUNDS
4101 RHA-HSNG CHOICE VOUCHER-SEC 8
X-ORDNRY/SPC-XFER OT - - 43,839 - - 100% (43,839) [97]EXPENDITURE - - 43,839 - - 100% (43,839) 4201 RHA-CAPITAL FUND
INTERGOV FED GRANT (1,463,024) (1,463,024) (1,032,754) - 71% 71% (430,270) [98]REVENUE (1,463,024) (1,463,024) (1,032,754) - 71% 71% (430,270)PROF & ADMIN 288,966 288,966 - - 0% 0% 288,966 OTHER OPERATING 180,000 180,000 103,976 1,413 59% 58% 74,611 EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 345,000 345,000 184,210 120,754 88% 53% 40,036 [99]ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 90,000 90,000 - - 0% 0% 90,000 GRANT EXPENDITURES 47,000 47,000 11,719 6,281 38% 25% 29,000OPER XFERS OUT 512,058 512,058 590,186 - 115% 115% (78,128) [100]EXPENDITURE 1,463,024 1,463,024 890,091 128,448 70% 61% 444,485 4401 RHA-HACIENDA
OTHER REVENUE (83,804) (83,804) - - 0% 0% (83,804) [101] REVENUE (83,804) (83,804) - - 0% 0% (83,804)
SALARIES AND WAGES 17,192 - - - - - -PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 16,612 - - - - - -PROF & ADMIN - 33,804 4,935 - 15% 15% 28,869OTHER OPERATING 5,000 5,000 - - 0% 0% 5,000 EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 45,000 45,000 - - 0% 0% 45,000
EXPENDITURE 83,804 83,804 4,935 - 6% 6% 78,869
4404 RHA-NEVIN PLAZA
OTHER REVENUE (1,050) (1,050) - - 0% 0% (1,050) [102]INTERGOV FED GRANT (576,793) (576,793) (368,101) - 64% 64% (208,692) [103] REVENUE (577,843) (577,843) (368,101) - 64% 64% (209,742) NOTES[97] Budget will be added to cover transfer [98] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs.[99] Encumbered temporary staffing services from Renoir Staffing, LLC. [100] Transfer out for subsidy of capital project fund[101] Revenues are not received equally monthly.[102] Revenues are not received equally monthly.[103] Revenues are received expenditures occur.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
SALARIES AND WAGES 17,192 - 505 - - - (505)
PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 16,612 - 174 - - - (174)
PROF & ADMIN 47,050 80,854 21,743 6,065 34% 27% 53,046
OTHER OPERATING 1,500 1,500 50 - 3% 3% 1,450
UTILITIES 2,000 2,000 - - 0% 0% 2,000OPER XFERS OUT 493,489 493,489 - - 0% 0% 493,489 EXPENDITURE 577,843 577,843 22,472 6,065 5% 4% 549,306
4405 RHA-NYSTROM VILLAGE
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (44) - - 100% 44OTHER REVENUE (15,000) (15,000) (623) - 4% 4% (14,377) [104] RENTAL INCOME (277,868) (277,868) (263,717) - 95% 95% (14,151) INTERGOV FED GRANT (507,132) (507,132) (422,429) - 83% 83% (84,703) OPER XFERS IN (1,155,748) (1,155,748) (365,756) - 32% 32% (789,992) [105] REVENUE (1,955,748) (1,955,748) (1,052,570) - 54% 54% (903,179)SALARIES AND WAGES 484,440 209,368 124,105 - 59% 59% 85,263 PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 218,529 119,646 91,060 - 76% 76% 28,586 [106] PROF & ADMIN 361,060 734,515 445,138 70,806 70% 61% 218,571 OTHER OPERATING 230,050 230,050 89,556 35,658 54% 39% 104,836 UTILITIES 224,500 224,500 159,946 1,317 72% 71% 63,237
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 322,600 322,600 24,239 4,610 9% 8% 293,751 PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 52,160 52,160 30,514 4,035 66% 59% 17,611COST POOL 62,409 62,409 46,809 - 75% 75% 15,600ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY - 500 - - 0% 0% 500EXPENDITURE 1,955,748 1,955,748 1,011,368 116,426 58% 52% 827,955 4406 RHA-RICHMOND VILLAGE ONE
INTERGOV FED GRANT (192,086) (192,086) (151,881) - 79% 79% (40,205) OPER XFERS IN - - (27,634) - - 100% 27,634 [107]REVENUE (192,086) (192,086) (179,515) - 93% 93% (12,571)GRANT EXPENDITURES 192,086 192,086 179,204 - 93% 93% 12,882 [108]EXPENDITURE 192,086 192,086 179,204 - 93% 93% 12,882NOTES[104] Revenues are not received equally monthly.[105] Transfer-in will take place as needed.[106] Health insurance benefits higher than anticipated [107] Transfer in for Village One subsidy. Budget will be added.[108] Operational expenditures for Richmond Village One is higher than anticipated

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
4407 RHA-RICHMOND VILLAGE TWO
INTERGOV FED GRANT (135,616) (135,616) (109,455) - 81% 81% (26,161) OPER XFERS IN - - (33,202) - - 100% 33,202 [109]
REVENUE (135,616) (135,616) (142,657) - 105% 105% 7,041GRANT EXPENDITURES 135,616 135,616 142,382 - 105% 105% (6,766) [110] EXPENDITURE 135,616 135,616 142,382 - 105% 105% (6,766) 4408 RHA-RICHMOND VILLAGE THREE
INTERGOV FED GRANT (61,959) (61,959) (49,375) - 80% 80% (12,584) OPER XFERS IN - - (17,292) - - 100% 17,292 [111]
REVENUE (61,959) (61,959) (66,667) - 108% 108% 4,708GRANT EXPENDITURES 61,959 61,959 66,557 - 107% 107% (4,598) [112]EXPENDITURE 61,959 61,959 66,557 - 107% 107% (4,598) 4501 RHA-CENTRAL OFFICE COST CNTR
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (30,000) - - 100% 30,000 [113]USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (9) - - 100% 9 OTHER REVENUE - - (1,864) - - - 1,864 [114]
OPER XFERS IN (201,725) (201,725) (146,302) - 73% 73% (55,423) [115] X-ORDNRY/SPC-XFER IN - - (43,839) - - 100% 43,839 [116] REVENUE (201,725) (201,725) (222,014) - 110% 110% 20,289SALARIES AND WAGES 38,204 38,204 124,642 - 326% 326% (86,438) [117] PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 102,733 102,733 159,549 - 155% 155% (56,816) [117] OTHER OPERATING - - 1,502 - - 100% (1,502) [118]
UTILITIES - - 6,032 - - 100% (6,032) [119]
COST POOL 60,788 60,788 45,599 - 75% 75% 15,189EXPENDITURE 201,725 201,725 337,325 - 167% 167% (135,599)NOTES[109] Transfer in for Village Two subsidy. Budget will be added.[110] Paid operation expenses for RHA Richmond Village II[111] Transfer in for Village Three subsidy. Budget will be added.[112] Paid operation expenses for RHA Richmond Village III [113] Received un-budgeted management fee revenue[114] Received reimbursement from Home Depot. [115] Transfer-in will take place as needed.[116] Received duplicate payments from landlords. [117] Contras not posted. Will be submit paperwork.[118] Will do a budget transfer for postage. [119] Paid Verizon wireless expenses. Will do a budget transfer for expenses.

Attachment 2 - FY2024-25 Q3 Budget Review - Non-General Fund by Type FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB
W/
ENCUMB
% USED
W/O
ENCUMB
% USED

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
NOTES
4502 RHA-HOUSING CORPORATION
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (5,000) (5,000) (15,281) - 306% 306% 10,281 [120]REVENUE (5,000) (5,000) (15,281) - 306% 306% 10,281PROF & ADMIN 14,050 14,050 - - 0% 0% 14,050 EXPENDITURE 14,050 14,050 - - 0% 0% 14,050TOTAL RICHMOND HOUSING AUTHORITY REVENUES (4,676,806) (4,676,806) (3,079,559) - 66% 66% (1,597,247)TOTAL RICHMOND HOUSING AUTHORITY EXPENDITURES 4,685,856 4,685,856 2,698,172 250,939 63% 58% 1,987,684TOTAL RICHMOND HOUSING AUTHORITY FUNDS 9,050 9,050 (381,387) 250,939 -1441% -4214% 390,437NOTES[120] Received surplus of deferred fee payment.NON GF - REVENUE (254,008,291) (297,779,092) (152,807,208) - 51% 51% (144,971,884)NON GF - EXPENDITURE 332,078,233 431,433,732 152,869,746 58,747,779 49% 35% 219,816,207 NON GF - GRAND TOTAL 78,069,941 133,654,640 62,538 58,747,779 44% 0% 74,844,323

City of Richmond
FY2024-25
Q3 - March 2025
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvements Projects By Fund
Line # NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY2024-25

TRANSFERS/
ADJUST
FY2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2024-25
03/31/25

ACTUALS
FY2024-25

ENCUMB BALANCE

REMAINING
% Without
ENCUMB % USED Notes
1002 - GAS TAX
1 REVENUE (3,173,758) - (3,173,758) (2,309,060) - (864,699) 73% 73% [1] 2 STREET PAVING 3,293,598 222,294 3,515,892 1,752,821 857,473 905,598 50% 74% [2] 3 TOTAL - STATE GAS TAX - EXPENSES 3,293,598 222,294 3,515,892 1,752,821 857,473 905,598 50% 74% 1005 - LIBRARY GRANT
4 REVENUE (964,628) - (964,628) - - (964,628) 0% 0% [3] 5 BOOKMOBILE - NEW 70,000 - 70,000 - - 70,000 0% 0%
6 MAIN LIBRARY REMODEL - 621,456 621,456 432,107 189,349 - 70% 100% [4] 7 TOTAL - LIBRARY GRANT - EXPENSES 70,000 621,456 691,456 432,107 189,349 70,000 62% 90% 1006 - OUTSIDE FUNDED GRANTS
8 REVENUE (18,547,536) - (18,547,536) (2,424,046) - (16,123,490) 13% 13% [3] 9 DIRT WORLD BIKE PARK REVITALIZATION 64,444 84,312 148,756 101,931 15,722 31,103 69% 79% [5] 10 PARKS MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT - 161,797 161,797 71,910 143,820 (53,932) 44% 133% [6] 11 RICHMOND COMMUNITIES CLEAN
COLLOBORATIVE 3,786,779 491,783 4,278,562 145,145 4,052,706 80,711 3% 98% [7] 12 SHIELDS-REID PARK REVITALIZATION 1,979,144 4,612,759 6,591,903 1,550,550 3,479,380 1,561,973 24% 76% [8] 13 TERMINAL 4 WHARF REMOVAL 1,541,853 544,498 2,086,351 540,633 429,756 1,115,963 26% 47% 14 TOTAL - OUTSIDE FUNDED GRANTS - EXPENSES 7,372,220 5,895,150 13,267,369 2,410,169 8,121,383 2,735,818 18% 79% 1019 - ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) SB1 15 REVENUE (2,966,001) - (2,966,001) (2,267,431) - (698,570) 76% 76% [9] 16 13TH STREET COMPLETE STREET 450,000 - 450,000 - - 450,000 0% 0% 17 2024 SLURRY SEAL 2,516,001 885,432 3,401,433 2,642,940 314,828 443,665 78% 87% [10] Notes:
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
[6] $53,932 expenditure in FY23-24 were moved to FY24-25 as vehicles were acquired in FY24-25. PO with 72 HOUR LLC was carried forward at $161,797 [8] Multiple PO's for the encumbered for construction, construction management and landscape architecture were carried forward from FY23-24 and additional PO's encumbered for Artist in FY24-25. [7] PO encumbered with Pacific States Environment $3,728,299 and Ninyo & Moore 185,447 for Boorman Park Site Remediation. [9] SB1 revenue has a one month lag time, actuals are through February 2025 $2,123,286; and also includes Pool interest & Gain $144,145 . [4] Main Library Remodel Design PO encumbered with Noll & Tam carried forward from FY23-24 $621,456. [1] Gas Tax revenue has a one month lag time, actuals are through February 2024. [3] Grant revenue is received after expense occurs.
[10] PO encumbered with Pavement Coatings Co. for the 2024 Slurry Seal Project NTE $2,957,768. City Council approved 7-2-24. [2] Multiple PO's encumbered for equipment rental, asphalt materials and supplies to support the street paving program. [5] Carry Forward PO's from FY23-24 Placeworks $37,368, Mack5 $19,675 and JPB Design Inc $27,270.

459
City of Richmond
FY2024-25
Q3 - March 2025
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvements Projects By Fund
Line # NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY2024-25

TRANSFERS/
ADJUST
FY2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2024-25
03/31/25

ACTUALS
FY2024-25

ENCUMB BALANCE

REMAINING
% Without
ENCUMB % USED Notes
1019 - ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) SB1 - continued 28 CARLSON BLVD 2023-2024 2,864,927 - 2,864,927 - - 2,864,927 0% 0% 29 STREET PAVING - CUTTING/HARBOUR WAY S.

BIKEWAY 40,917 105,702 146,619 7,628 98,075 40,917 5% 72% 30 STREET PAVING - MARINA WAY - 1,794 1,794 - 1,794 - 0% 100% [11] 31 TOTAL - RMRA - EXPENSES 5,871,845 992,928 6,864,773 2,650,567 414,696 3,799,509 39% 45% 1054 - ENGINEERING GRANTS
32 REVENUE (19,928,886) (292,000) (20,220,886) (2,340,552) - (17,880,334) 12% 12% [12] 33 13TH STREET COMPLETE STREET 2,821,000 - 2,821,000 - - 2,821,000 0% 0% 34 ATP QUICK BUILD CUTTING/HOFFMAN 27,686 - 27,686 - - 27,686 0% 0% 35 BARRETT AVE RD. IMPROVEMENT 251,280 - 251,280 - 226,600 24,680 0% 90% [13] 36 BOORMAN PARK REVITALIZATION 3,550,461 130,504 3,680,965 81,656 26,673 3,572,637 2% 3% 37 CUTTING CARLSON BLVD. SECTION 130 458,000 292,000 750,000 3,801 550,841 195,358 1% 74% 38 BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE - 4,259 4,259 1,298 - 2,961 30% 30% 39 GREENING THE YELOW BRICK ROAD 265,198 498,918 764,116 336,891 162,027 265,198 44% 65% 40 GREENWAY REHAB AND BIKE EDUCATION 5,000 - 5,000 - - 5,000 0% 0% 41 HARBOUR 8 PARK EXTENSION 268,741 2,411,448 2,680,189 2,268,516 162,932 248,741 85% 91% [14] 42 HARBOUR WAY & WRIGHT SECTION 130 938,286 227,952 1,166,238 38,284 192,744 935,210 3% 20% 43 I-80 CENTRAL INTERCHANGE PHASE II 3,994,490 495,975 4,490,465 30,332 500,394 3,959,739 1% 12% 44 LINCOLN SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL - 496,000 496,000 2,850 453,150 40,000 1% 92% [15] 45 MACDONALD AVE PEDESTRAIN CROSSING 34,560 - 34,560 - 33,215 1,345 0% 96% [16] 46 MCBRYDE SAFE ROUTES TO PARKS - 1,028,000 1,028,000 - - 1,028,000 0% 0% 47 PT. RICHMOND BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY - 178,400 178,400 - - 178,400 0% 0% 48 RICHMOND ART AND LIGHT 3,204,474 265,023 3,469,497 108,479 142,050 3,218,969 3% 7% 49 YELLOW BRICK ROAD CLEAN, GREEN &
BEAUTIFUL 1,304,661 2,438,768 3,743,429 1,912,012 1,803,147 28,270 51% 99% [17] 50 TOTAL - ENGINEERING GRANTS - EXPENSES 17,123,837 8,467,247 25,591,084 4,784,119 4,253,773 16,553,192 19% 35% Notes:
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 [17] PO'S with Pogo Park $2,353,125 and Mack5 $80,680 carry forward from FY23-24 and new PO encumbered with Nema Construction $1,037,700 in FY24-25. [14] PO with Pogo Park $2,260,051 and Mack5 $148,556 carry forward from FY23-24. [12] Engineering grant revenue are reimbursable after expenditure has occurred. Actuals are for Harbour 8 Park Extension $1,050,492, Harbour Way & Wright Section 130 $11,752, Yellow Brick Rd. Clean, Green & Beautiful $642,407, Cutting Carlson Section 130 $3,801 and ATP Quick Build Cutting/Hoffman $396,511, 37TH ST $41,358, Boorman Park Revitalization $154,217, I-80 $2,229, Lincoln Safe Routes to School $2,350, Bridge Preventative Maintenance $35,435. [13] New PO encumbered with Kimley-Horn for Design in FY24-25. [11] PO with GBI $1,794 carry forward from FY23-24.
[15] New PO encumbered with BuidCorp Inc. $456,000 in FY24-25 . [16] New PO encumbered with Kimley-Horn in FY24-25.

460
City of Richmond
FY2024-25
Q3 - March 2025
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvements Projects By Fund
Line # NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY2024-25

TRANSFERS/
ADJUST
FY2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2024-25
03/31/25

ACTUALS
FY2024-25

ENCUMB BALANCE

REMAINING
% Without
ENCUMB % USED Notes
1306 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA)
58 REVENUE - - - - - -
59 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA),
SIDEWALKS, CURBS - 2,319,832 2,319,832 1,850,907 468,925 - 80% 100% [18] 60 13TH STREET COMPLETE STREET 1,000,000 (1,000,000) - - - - 61 BOOKER T. ANDERSON (BTA) CENTER HVAC 89,880 142,841 232,721 202,826 29,895 (0) 87% 100% [19] 62 BOOKER T. ANDERSON (BTA) CENTER
INFRASTRUCTURE 286,157 19,190 305,347 179,978 125,369 - 59% 100% [20] 63 MAIN LIBRARY REMODEL 298,716 1,080,066 1,378,782 654,257 724,525 - 47% 100% [21] 64 NORTH RICHMOND PUMP STATION - 359,203 359,203 4,469 354,734 - 1% 100% [22] 65 SOCCER FIELDS-RESTROOMS-PARKS 7,703,008 - 7,703,008 287,472 308,611 7,106,924 4% 8% 66 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE 750,000 - 750,000 - 750,000 - 0% 100% [23] 67 STREET PAVING - 2,144,834 2,144,834 24,937 2,119,897 - 1% 100% [24] 68 TOTAL - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) -
EXPENSES 10,127,761 5,065,965 15,193,726 3,204,845 4,881,957 7,106,924 21% 53% 2001 - GENERAL CAPITAL
69 REVENUE (8,182,000) (3,235,091) (11,417,091) (9,545,587) - (1,871,504) 84% 84% [25] 70 13TH STREET COMPLETE STREET 82,951 1,077,571 1,160,522 44,218 44,825 1,071,479 4% 8% 71 37TH STREET IMPROVEMENT 38,100 7,437 45,537 4,585 2,852 38,100 10% 16% 72 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA),
SIDEWALKS, CURBS 803,421 229,471 1,032,892 417,081 220,379 395,432 40% 62% 73 ATP QUICK BUILD CUTTING/HOFFMAN 101,901 184,128 286,029 - 184,128 101,901 0% 64% 74 AUDIO VIDEO EQUIPMENT REPLACMENT 38,170 - 38,170 - 5,368 32,802 0% 14% 75 AUDITORIUM UPGRADES - 43,912 43,912 40,542 3,370 - 92% 100% [26] 76 BARRETT AVE RD. IMPROVEMENT 27,920 - 27,920 - - 27,920 0% 0% 77 BAYVIEW TO BART 270,000 - 270,000 - - 270,000 0% 0%
78 BOOKER T. ANDERSON PHASE II - 2,521,606 2,521,606 - 16,209 2,505,397 0% 1% Notes:
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 [18] PO's with Calico $1,500,000, Harris & Associate $596,930, Mack5 $204,280 carry forward from FY23-24. [19] PO's with Arntz Builders $202,317, O'Mahony $6,000, Costa Engineers $4,500, ZFA Engineers $5,000 carry forward from FY23-24. [21] Main Library Remodel Design PO encumbered with Noll & Tam carried forward from FY23-24 $1,205,579 and Mack5 for Project Management $90,644. [22] PO with Contra Costa County $359,203 carried forward from FY23-24. [26] PO with Pro-cal Lighting $43,912 carry forward from FY23-24. [25] Transfer in from GF for Via Verdi and Paving Projects and Interest and investment revenue in earned on General Capital Fund Cash in Q1. [20] PO's with First Alarm $2,800, Macks Craic $31,264, Ninyo & Moore $2,100 and Arntz Builders $20,522.92 were carried-forward from FY23-24. [23] New PO encumbered with Veolia $750,000 in FY24-25
[24] New PO's encumbered with Martin Marietta Materials $1,144,834, Calmat Co. $500,000 and San Rafael Rock Quarry $500,000 in FY24-25

461
City of Richmond
FY2024-25
Q3 - March 2025
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvements Projects By Fund
Line # NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY2024-25

TRANSFERS/
ADJUST
FY2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2024-25
03/31/25

ACTUALS
FY2024-25

ENCUMB BALANCE

REMAINING
% Without
ENCUMB % USED Notes
2001 - GENERAL CAPITAL (continued)
88 BOORMAN PARK REVITALIZATION 2,799,776 400,000 3,199,776 25,676 12,148 3,161,952 1% 1% 89 BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 29,310 77,371 106,681 20,479 - 86,202 19% 19% 90 BUILT ENVIRONMENT NEEDS ASSESSMENT - 500,000 500,000 - - 500,000 0% 0% 91 CANAL BLVD. GATES/FENCE - 100,000 100,000 - - 100,000 0% 0% 92 CARLSON BLVD. FY2023-2024 1,208,045 1,224,349 2,432,394 268,342 493,003 1,671,049 11% 31% 93 CCTV CAMERAS (POLICE & PUBLIC WORKS) - 355,000 355,000 - - 355,000 0% 0% 94 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA LANDSCAPING 200,000 - 200,000 - - 200,000 0% 0% 95 CORP YARD FENCE 37,500 - 37,500 - - 37,500 0% 0%
96 CORP YARD BATHROOM REMODEL 12,435 - 12,435 - - 12,435 0% 0% 97 CORP YARD FUEL SITES UPGRADES 101,610 - 101,610 - - 101,610 0% 0% 98 CORP YARD SECURITY CAMERAS 37,500 - 37,500 - - 37,500 0% 0% 99 DORNAN TUNNEL LIGHTING 31,419 21,996 53,415 - 21,996 31,419 0% 41% 100 FIRE STATION 63 IMPROVEMENTS 291,000 9,000 300,000 23,916 9,012 267,073 8% 11% 101 FIRE STATION 66 - GENDER SPECIFIC
RESTROOMS 780,052 - 780,052 - - 780,052 0% 0%
102 GREENWAY REHAB AND BIKE EDUCATION 25,000 - 25,000 - - 25,000 0% 0% 103 HARBOUR 8 PARK EXPANSION 300,000 - 300,000 - - 300,000 0% 0% 104 IT FIRE EOC EQUIPMENT 147,869 - 147,869 - - 147,869 0% 0% 105 LINCOLN SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 112,189 111,286 223,475 7,455 - 216,020 3% 3% 106 MAIN LIBRARY REMODEL - 7,682,441 7,682,441 93,307 138,550 7,450,584 1% 3% 107 MCBRYDE SAFE ROUTES TO PARKS 260,000 - 260,000 - - 260,000 0% 0% 108 MCDONALD AVE PEDESTRAIN CROSSING 28,880 - 28,880 - - 28,880 0% 0% 109 METROWALK TRANSIT VILLAGE 38,100 7,437 45,537 4,027 3,410 38,100 9% 16% 110 NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER 50,000 - 50,000 - - 50,000 0% 0% 111 NETWORK REFRESH 255,055 - 255,055 - - 255,055 0% 0% 112 NEVIN CENTER HVAC 52,750 - 52,750 - - 52,750 0% 0%
113 PARCHESTER AREA INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENT - 500,000 500,000 - - 500,000 0% 0%
114 POST ENCAMPMENT CLEANUP EQUIPMENT 75,000 - 75,000 6,748 - 68,252 9% 9% 115 PT. MOLATE COTTAGES ASSESSMENT 16,898 663,189 680,087 164,799 498,390 16,898 24% 98% [27] 116 PT. RICHMOND BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY - 267,500 267,500 - - 267,500 0% 0% 117 RECREATION CENTER HVAC 36,775 - 36,775 - - 36,775 0% 0% 118 RHEEM CREEK FLOOD RISK REDUCTION 24,195 515,044 539,239 360,903 103,573 74,763 67% 86% [28] Notes:
119
120
[27] PO's with WJE $573,674, Swinerton $47,014 and Bay Hawk $42,500 carry forward from FY23-24. [28] PO's with Mack5 $9,022, The Watershed $54,294, UST Testing $181,291 carry forward from FY23-24 and new PO encumbered with EBMUD for $1,000.

462
City of Richmond
FY2024-25
Q3 - March 2025
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvements Projects By Fund
Line # NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY2024-25

TRANSFERS/
ADJUST
FY2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2024-25
03/31/25

ACTUALS
FY2024-25

ENCUMB BALANCE

REMAINING
% Without
ENCUMB % USED Notes
2001 - GENERAL CAPITAL (continued)
121 RICHMOND COMMUNITIES CLEAN
COLLOBORATIVE 1,326,950 2,314,395 3,641,345 122,525 1,366,822 2,151,997 3% 41% 122 SANTA RITA ROAD STABILIZATION - 211,686 211,686 70,475 48,291 92,921 33% 56% 123 SF BAY TRAIL - (PT. RICHMOND TO PT. MOLATE) 2,043,548 868 2,044,416 - 868 2,043,548 0% 0% 124 STREET PAVING 4,388,869 (1,167,932) 3,220,937 965,376 234,033 2,021,528 30% 37% 125 STREET SWEEPING SIGNS INSTALLATION 550,000 - 550,000 42,000 470,637 37,363 8% 93% [29] 126 TERMINAL 4 WHARF REMOVAL 760,000 - 760,000 - - 760,000 0% 0% 127 TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM 1,351,472 134,549 1,486,021 47,408 27,589 1,411,024 3% 5% 128 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 6TH &
MACDONALD 49,213 145,420 194,633 106,345 39,075 49,213 55% 75% [30] 129 VIA VERDI MITIGATION 4,500,000 - 4,500,000 - - 4,500,000 0% 0% 130 YELLOW BRICK RD. 198,061 (18,546) 179,515 63,439 76,075 40,000 35% 78% [31] 131 YELLOW BRICK ROAD CLEAN, GREEN &
BEAUTIFUL 30,000 72,061 102,061 - - 102,061 0% 0%
132 TOTAL - GENERAL CAPITAL - EXPENSES 23,511,934 18,191,238 41,703,172 2,899,644 4,020,605 34,782,923 7% 17% 2002 - MEASURE J
133 REVENUE (1,527,861) - (1,527,861) (2,351,543) - 823,682 154% 154% [32] 134 ADA SIDEWALKS - 60,516 60,516 - 60,516 - 0% 100% [33] 135 I-80 CENTRAL INTERCHANGE PHASE II 180,000 5,742 185,742 86,410 65,317 34,016 47% 82% [34] 136 STREET PAVING - 107,982 107,982 86,989 20,993 - 81% 100% [35] 137 SURFACE DRAINAGE 300,000 - 300,000 - - 300,000 0% 0% 138 TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM 1,867,280 - 1,867,280 6,390 7,675 1,853,215 0% 1% 139 TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 375,000 183,546 558,546 129,501 333,759 95,286 23% 83% [36] 140 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 6TH &
MACDONALD - 96,662 96,662 81,241 15,421 - 84% 100% [37] 141 TOTAL - MEASURE J - EXPENSES 2,722,280 454,447 3,176,727 390,530 503,681 2,282,517 12% 28% Notes:
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
[34] PO with Contra Costa County for ROW services and carry forward PO with Nichols Consulting plus added funds for this year. [35] PO's with Nichols Consulting $29,711, Yerba Buena $76,060 and Precision Emprise $2,212 carry forward from FY23-24. [36] New PO's encumbered with Whitlock & Weinberger $81,260, Fehr & Peers $86,130, Nema Construction $37,050 [37] PO with Nema Construction $75,362 and CSW $21,300 carry forward from FY23-24. [29] Precision Emprise $42,000 encumbered & paid for data collection/assessment and PO encumbered with Bay Hawk $470,137 for Signs Installation . [30] PO with Nema Construction $145,420 carry forward from FY23-24. [31] Final change order encumbered with Ghilotti Bros Inc for the completion of the Yellow Brick Rd $134,439 and $6,000 for APM to close out project. [32] Measure J revenue annual allocation received $1,959,482, grant reimbursements for I-80 $271,879 and 13th St $16,592 and pooled interest and investment gain of $103,590 [33] PO with Precision Emprise Inc $20,956 and Malachi $39.560 carried forward from FY23-24.

463
City of Richmond
FY2024-25
Q3 - March 2025
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvements Projects By Fund
Line # NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY2024-25

TRANSFERS/
ADJUST
FY2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2024-25
03/31/25

ACTUALS
FY2024-25

ENCUMB BALANCE

REMAINING
% Without
ENCUMB % USED Notes
2116 - OPEN SPACE IMPACT FEE
151 REVENUE - - - - - - 100% 100% [38]
152 PT. MOLATE TRAIL BEACH STABILIZTION - 500,000 500,000 - - 500,000 0% 0% 153 SF BAY TRAIL - (PT. RICHMOND TO PT. MOLATE) 500,000 (500,000) - - - - 154 TOTAL - OPENSPACE IMPACT FEE - EXPENSES 500,000 - 500,000 - - 500,000 0% 0% 2117 - LIBRARY IMPACT FEE
155 REVENUE - - - - - - 100% 100% [38]
156 BOOKMOBILE - NEW 151,874 (5,684) 146,190 59,945 1,371 70,000 41% 42% 157 MAIN LIBRARY REMODEL 1,064,188 - 1,064,188 - - 1,064,188 0% 0% 158 TOTAL - LIBRARY IMPACT FEE - EXPENSES 1,216,062 (5,684) 1,210,378 59,945 1,371 1,134,188 5% 5% 2120 - WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE
159 TOTAL REVENUE - - - - - - 100% 100% [38]
160 COGENERATION - 672,196 672,196 3,078 669,118 - 0% 100% [39] 161 SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS /BRICK MANHOLE
REHAB 250,000 - 250,000 - - 250,000 0% 0%
162 TOTAL - WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE - EXPENSES 250,000 672,196 922,196 3,078 669,118 250,000 0% 73% 163 TOTAL - REVENUE - CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS (55,290,670) (3,527,091) (58,817,761) (21,238,218) - (37,579,543) 36% 36% 164 TOTAL - EXPENSES - CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS 72,059,537 40,577,237 112,636,773 18,587,825 23,913,406 70,120,669 17% 38% 1201 - HOUSING DEPARTMENT - CDBG
165 ADA REHABILITATION/ CDBG BTA 335,000 - 335,000 - - 335,000 0% 0% 166 ADA REHABILITATION/ CDBG PARCHESTER 415,638 - 415,638 - - 415,638 0% 0% 167 TOTAL - HOUSING DEPARTMENT - ADA 750,638 - 750,638 - - 750,638 0% 0% 1307 - TRANSFORMATIVE CLIMATE COMMUNITIES (TCC)
168 ADA ACCESSIBLE GARDENS 286,500 351,202 637,702 24,635 321,608 291,459 4% 54% 169 E-BIKE LENDING LIBRARY 326,400 3,261 329,661 36,582 238,750 54,329 11% 84% [40] 170 E-BIKE SHARE 299,700 102,905 402,605 213,777 89,128 99,700 53% 75% [41] 171 NEIGHBORHOOD COMPLETE STREETS 4,726,873 425,200 5,152,073 41,236 396,737 4,714,100 1% 9% 172 RICHMND WELLNESS TRAIL PHASE II 1,444,800 57,909 1,502,709 122,586 852,556 527,567 8% 65% 173 TOTAL - TCC 7,084,273 940,476 8,024,749 438,816 1,898,779 5,687,154 5% 29% Notes:
174
175
176
177 [41] PO carried forward from FY23-24 for Charleston Mobility $102,905 pus additonal funds encumbered in FY24-25 $200,000 [39] PO with Veolia $672,196 carry forward from FY23-24. [38] Impact Fee revenue budget is adjusted at mid-year. [40] New PO encumbered with Groundwork Richmond $250,000

464
City of Richmond
FY2024-25
Q3 - March 2025
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvements Projects By Fund
Line # NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY2024-25

TRANSFERS/
ADJUST
FY2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2024-25
03/31/25

ACTUALS
FY2024-25

ENCUMB BALANCE

REMAINING
% Without
ENCUMB % USED Notes
4001 - PORT CIP
178 CAFETERIA BUILDING WINTERIZATION 141,894 67,000 208,894 - 77,000 131,894 0% 37% 179 ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE 60,000 59,800 119,800 19,878 89,700 10,222 17% 91% [42] 180 HISTORIC SHIP MOVE 500,000 - 500,000 - - 500,000 0% 0% 181 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 150,000 365,000 515,000 327,823 78,928 108,250 64% 79% [43] 182 PORT ELECTRICAL MAINT. & REPAIRS 200,000 - 200,000 - - 200,000 0% 0% 183 PORT INFRASTRUCURE UPGRADE 150,000 - 150,000 - 150,000 - 0% 100% [44] 184 PPMT ELECTRICAL AND WATERING METERING 365,000 (365,000) - - - - 185 PROCESSING BUILDING ASSESSMENT 100,000 - 100,000 - - 100,000 0% 0% 186 PROCESSING BUILDING VENTILATION 55,000 - 55,000 - - 55,000 0% 0% 187 PROCESSING BUILDING WINDOW REPAIR 350,000 - 350,000 150,000 - 200,000 43% 43% 188 RIGGERS LOFT PAINTING 175,000 - 175,000 - - 175,000 0% 0% 189 STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS - PORT 500,000 (150,350) 349,650 - - 349,650 0% 0% 190 TERMINALS 7 & 8 DREDGING 65,000 150,350 215,350 6,250 - 209,100 3% 3% 191 TERMINALS 7 & 8 ELECTRIFICATION 1,700,000 - 1,700,000 - 120,000 1,580,000 0% 7% 192 YACHT ENTRANCE HARBOUR DREDGING 45,000 - 45,000 - - 45,000 0% 0% 193 TOTAL - PORT CIP 4,556,894 126,800 4,683,694 503,951 515,628 3,664,116 11% 22% 4003 - WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY WASTEWATER CIP
194 COGENERATION - - - - - -
195 CUTTING BLVD. & HARBOUR WAY S. SEWER 13,750,000 - 13,750,000 - - 13,750,000 0% 0% 196 DECLORINATION - 737,748 737,748 - 5,643 732,105 0% 1% 197 DORNAN DRIVE FORCE MAIN REHABILITATION 879,869 124,069 1,003,938 414,886 32,863 556,189 41% 45% 198 DORNAN DRIVE TUNNEL REHABILITATION 2,600,000 - 2,600,000 - - 2,600,000 0% 0% 199 FERRY POINT-DORNAN DR. PUMP STATION - 399,775 399,775 26,736 423,039 (50,000) 7% 113% [45] 200 FIRST ST, & BISSEL SEWER - 10,433 10,433 - 10,433 - 0% 100% [46] 201 FIRST ST, WET WEATHER - 207,572 207,572 - 207,572 - 0% 100% [47] Notes:
202
203
204
205
206
207
[46] PO with Veolia $10,433 carry forward from FY23-24
[47] PO with Veolia $207,572 carry forward from FY23-24 [42] PO with Nema $59,800 carry forward from FY23-24.
[45] PO's with Veolia $394,906 and CSW $4,869 carry forward from FY23-24 and new PO encumbered for $50,000 to Schaaf and Wheeler; budget amendment proposed for Q3 [43] Encumbered PO with WR Forde $406,750 in FY24-25 for Pavement maintenance at Point Portrero Marine Terminal. [44] Encumbered PO with Moffatt & Nichol in FY24-25 for Point Portrero Facilities Assessment

465
City of Richmond
FY2024-25
Q3 - March 2025
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvements Projects By Fund
Line # NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY2024-25

TRANSFERS/
ADJUST
FY2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2024-25
03/31/25

ACTUALS
FY2024-25

ENCUMB BALANCE

REMAINING
% Without
ENCUMB % USED Notes
4003 - WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY WASTEWATER CIP - continued 208 GRIT AND AERATION REPLACEMENT 81,307 1,794,365 1,875,672 5,469 1,698,510 171,694 0% 91% [48] 209 MARINA BAY PARKWAY FORCE MAIN - 99,645 99,645 - 99,645 - 0% 100% [49] 210 SANITARY SEWER/DESIGN CUTTING CARLSON &
HOFFMAN - 694,991 694,991 668,066 26,925 - 96% 100% [50] 211 SANITARY SEWER/PIPELINE REHAB 4,500,000 576,198 5,076,198 996,082 405,116 3,675,000 20% 28% 212 SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS 7,325,000 269,489 7,594,489 1,939,845 375,150 5,279,493 26% 30% 213 SEISMIC RETROFIT - 8,449 8,449 - 8,449 - 0% 100% [51] 214 WW 2017A BOND/DESIGN & ENG SERV - 281,876 281,876 281,000 876 - 100% 100% [52] 215 WW MACDONALD & VIRGINIA SEWER CAPACITY - 79,593 79,593 - 79,593 - 0% 100% [53] 216 WWTP MANHOLE REPLACEMENT 750,000 - 750,000 - - 750,000 0% 0% 217 WWTP SCADA UPGRADE - 4,709 4,709 - 4,709 - 0% 100% [54] 218 WWTP SLUDGE THICKENER 3,642,682 7,903,413 11,546,095 4,454,175 215,017 6,876,903 39% 40% 219 TOTAL - WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY
WASTEWATER CIP 33,528,858 13,192,322 46,721,180 8,786,258 3,593,539 34,341,384 19% 26% 4005 - MARINA
220 AREA FM CAP 912,930 295 913,225 18,598 178,102 716,525 2% 22% 221 TOTAL - MARINA CIP 912,930 295 913,225 18,598 178,102 716,525 2% 22% 4006 - STORMWATER
222 FULL TRASH CAPTURE FACILITIES - 623,070 623,070 499,828 123,242 - 80% 100% [55] 223 RHEEM CREEK FLOOD RISK REDUCTION 797,591 312,130 1,109,721 450,806 453,009 205,907 41% 81% [56] 224 TOTAL - STORMWATER CIP 797,591 935,200 1,732,791 950,634 576,250 205,907 55% 88% Notes:
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
[48] PO's with Veolia $1,788,327 and Mack5 $6,038 carry forward from FY23-24 [49] PO's with Veolia $99,645 carry forward from FY23-24 [50] PO's with Veolia $694,991 carry forward from FY23-24. [51] PO with Veolia $8,449 carry forward from FY23-24.
[52] PO with Veolia $281,876 carry forward from FY23-24. [53] PO's with Veolia $79,593 carry forward from FY23-24. [54] PO with Veolia $4,709 carry forward from FY23-24.
[55] PO with Veolia $623,070 carry forward from FY23-24. [56] PO's with The Watershed Project $298,779, Applied Materials & Engineering $10,416 and American Rivers $56,799 carry forward from FY24-25 and new PO encumbered with LSA Associate $57,100 and Mack5 $73,200 in FY24-25.

466
City of Richmond
FY2024-25
Q3 - March 2025
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvements Projects By Fund
Line # NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS

ORIGINAL
BUDGET
FY2024-25

TRANSFERS/
ADJUST
FY2024-25

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2024-25
03/31/25

ACTUALS
FY2024-25

ENCUMB BALANCE

REMAINING
% Without
ENCUMB % USED Notes
5003 - EQUIPMENT SERVICES CIP
234 FIRE VEHICLES 2,460,000 1,356,432 3,816,432 7,579 51,458 3,757,395 0% 2% [57] 235 OTHER CITY VEHICLES 1,935,000 2,292,581 4,227,581 1,013,007 1,493,679 1,720,896 24% 59% [57] 236 POLICE VEHICLES 1,465,000 241,815 1,706,815 350,847 965,296 390,672 21% 77% [57] 237 OTHER CITY EQUIPMENT 25,000 175,526 200,526 104,071 71,455 25,000 52% 88% [57] 238 TOTAL - EQUIPMENT SERVICES CIP 5,885,000 4,066,354 9,951,354 1,475,504 2,581,887 5,893,963 15% 41% 239 TOTAL - EXPENSES - ENTERPRISE AND OTHER
OPERATING FUNDS 53,516,184 19,261,448 72,777,632 12,173,761 9,344,185 51,259,686 17% 30% 240 GRAND TOTAL EXPENSES - ALL FUNDS 125,575,721 59,838,684 185,414,405 30,761,586 33,257,591 121,380,354 17% 35% 241 [57] Multiple POs encumbered for Equipment purchase and outfitting cost $2,766,354 were carry forward from FY23-24; new PO encumbered with Folsom Lake Ford $973,386.

467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483

May 6, 2025
Human Resources
DATE: May 6, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Nickie Mastay, Deputy City Manager
Sharrone Taylor, Director of Human Resources
Subject: Amend the Salary Schedule
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City Council’s authorization is required to establish salary ranges for classifications by amending the salary schedule.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution amending the salary schedule to add the salary range for Paratransit Coordinator and
Vocational Building Construction Instructor – Human
Resources Department (Nickie Mastay/Sharrone Taylor
510-620-6602).

AGENDA
REPORT
484

May 6, 2025
DISCUSSION:

PARATRANSIT COORDINATOR
The Paratransit Coordinator classification was deactivated during the Classification and Compensation Study process due to the Transportation division’s organizational structure at the time. Based on operational needs and audit recommendations the Paratransit Coordinator classification was re-established by the Personnel Board to meet the division’s operational requirements. The position will provide the technical expertise and specialized oversight required for the division’s current and future needs.

On March 27, 2025, the Personnel Board approved the re-establishment of the Paratransit Coordinator classification. Cit staff are bringing forth the salary range for approval by the City Council. Paratransit Coordinator is represented by IFPTE Local 21 Mid-Management Employees Bargaining Unit.

VOCATIONAL BUILDNG CONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTOR
With new grant funding, RichmondBUILD and YouthBUILD can expand their training opportunities. These programs must hire qualified instructional staff to meet performance benchmarks and provide adequate support to the participants. The growth in offerings has created a need for full-time Vocational Building Construction Instructors.

These instructors will deliver classroom and hands-on training, ensure safety compliance, and prepare participants for careers in construction.

On March 27, 2025, the Personnel Board approved the establishment of the Vocational Building Construction Instructor classification. City staff are bringing forth the salary range for approval by the City Council. Vocation Building Construction Instructor is represented by SEIU Local 1021, General Employee Bargaining Unit.

NEXT STEPS:

The job classification’s salary range and bargaining unit need to be added to the City’s salary schedule. Accordingly, the attached resolution will amend the salary schedule in the following manner:

Job Title Range Step 1 or
Min
Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 or
Max
Paratransit Coordinator M108 8,587.50 9,016.86 9,467.70 9,941.10 10,438.16 Vocational Building
Construction Instructor G105 6,518.38 6,844.28 7,186.50 7,545.82 7,923.10 City Council approval is required to amend the publicly available salary schedule. City staff recommend adoption of the resolution amending the salary schedule to add Paratransit Coordinator and Vocational Building Construction Instructor and the relative salary range(s) (Attachment 1).
485

May 6, 2025
ATTACHMENT: Attachment 1 – Resolution amending the salary schedule 486
RESOLUTION NO. _____

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA

AMENDING THE SALARY SCHEDULE
WHEREAS the Department of Human Resources maintains the classification and salary schedule on behalf of the City; and
WHEREAS the City wishes to amend the salary schedule and such amendments are supported by the City Manager.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that effective May 6, 2025, the Salary Schedule is hereby revised as follows and the Director of Human Resources shall publicly post the revised Salary Schedule.
-----------
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:
_____________________________

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:
____________________
Mayor
Job Job Title Range Step 1 or
Low
Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 or
High
TBD Paratransit Coordinator M108 8,587.50 9,016.86 9,467.70 9,941.10 10,438.16 TBD Vocational Building
Construction Instructor
G105 6,518.38 6,844.28 7,186.50 7,545.82 7,923.10
487
Approved as to form:
____________________
City Attorney
488

May 6, 2025
Library and Community Services
DATE: May 6, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: LaShonda White, Deputy City Manager
Subject: Contract Amendment with NOMAD Transit (dba Via, LLC) to Expand Richmond Moves Shuttle Service City-Wide
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City of Richmond received a $300,000 grant from Clean Mobility Options which will cover the cost to amend the Via contract for expanded services of the Richmond
Moves on-demand shuttle program city-wide.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

October 17, 2023
May 7, 2024

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City received a $300,000 grant from Clean Mobility
Options (CMO) to expand the Richmond Moves shuttle
program city-wide.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE a grant from Clean Mobility Options (CMO) in the amount of $300,000 to
expand Richmond Moves shuttle program city-wide, and
APPROVE a first contract amendment with Nomad
Transit, LLC (Via) for expanded city-wide shuttle service through Richmond Moves to add $300,000 to the
contract for a not to exceed contract limit of $6,535,000, maintaining the existing term of July 7, 2027 –
Community Services Department (LaShonda White 510-
620-6828).

AGENDA
REPORT
489

May 6, 2025
DISCUSSION:

Richmond Moves is a city-wide, on-demand transportation service in Richmond, CA, providing affordable and convenient rides, particularly for underserved neighborhoods, connecting residents to key transit hubs like BART and the ferry terminal. Richmond Moves is a shared shuttle service that reduces pollution in Richmond caused by greenhouse gas emissions, and operates on-demand, meaning you can book trips directly from your phone and get picked up within minutes. The service uses an app to match riders headed in the same direction, offering a private ride experience with the efficiency of public transit. The goal of Richmond Moves is to fill transportation gaps in Richmond, particularly for neighborhoods that lack other mobility options, and to connect residents with key transit hubs. Richmond Moves operates MondayFriday from 7:00am to 7:00pm. Vehicles are fully electrified. In total, the Richmond Moves micro-transit fleet is currently ten (10) zero emission vehicles to operate the service city-wide.

On May 7, 2024, City Council approved a $6,235,000 contract with Nomad Transit, LLC (dba Via) to expand transit routes to the majority of the City of Richmond for its existing city-wide shuttle service through Richmond Moves (Attachment 1). The grant was funded in part by the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) ($3,117,500) and the grant match was funded through the Environmental and Community Investment Agreement (ECIA) ($3,117,500).1 The contract term expires on July 7, 2027.

The current shuttle service is available to the majority of Richmond residents. However, The majority of District 4 was not included in the most recent expansion funded with TIRCP funds (see Current Zone map).

CURRENT ZONE

1 The Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) was created by Senate Bill (SB) 862 (Chapter 36, Statutes of 2014) and modified by Senate Bill 9 (Chapter 710, Statutes of 2015), to provide grants from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) to fund transformative capital improvements that will modernize California’s intercity, commuter, and urban rail systems, and bus and ferry transit systems, to significantly reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, vehicle miles traveled, and congestion. Through the six cycles of TIRCP funding, the California State Transportation Agency (CALSTA) has awarded more than $10 billion in funding to 132 projects throughout the state. 490

May 6, 2025
Funding became available through Clean Mobility Options (CMO) grant to expand services and City staff determined it would be beneficial to expand services so that the entire City of Richmond was covered (Attachment 2). The City received $300,000 from CMO to expand services to the remaining portion of District 4 as a pilot project through April 2026. Per the grant application, City staff had to present evidence that residents in District 4 would benefit from and utilize the shuttle service. Residents of District 4 shared their desire for the shuttle especially as a way to connect residents to public transportation as there is limited public bus service in that area. This expansion will also support school-aged youth, especially at DeAnza High School. Consequently, City staff are recommending approval a contract amendment with Nomad for city-wide shuttle service through Richmond Moves to effectuate service expansion (Attachment 3).

Future Zone Map
City staff will work closely with Via to use grant funds to purchase additional Richmond Moves vehicles and provide outreach for the new service area. Via shared that the additional vehicles 491

May 6, 2025
will be used primarily to support the expanded service area but can also be redeployed to the existing service area, if needed and based on demand. At the end of the pilot period in April 2026, the City will have to determine if the expansion was successful and should be funded for additional years. A potential funding source to continue the pilot in District 4 beyond 2026, and city-wide service beyond 2027 is ECIA Transportation funds.

HISTORY OF RICHMOND MOVES FUNDING
Since its launch in 2022, the City has received $8,035,000 in outside grant funding (including a grant match of $3,117,500 in ECIA funds) to support the 5-year pilot program through July 2027. The City received the following grants outlined below:
 $1,000,000 Grant from Clean Mobility Options Voucher Pilot Program (CMO): Initial award of $1 Million from the project that is funded through the California Air Resources Board.
 $500,000 Grant from CMO: An additional $500,000 in CMO funds to add two vans to increase the Richmond Moves fleet total to five and funds the Via operations to expand the service area.
 $6,235,000 Grant from Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) and ECIA:

The City received a Grant from Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) in the amount of $3,117,500. A grant match was funded through the Environmental and Community Investment Agreement (ECIA) in the amount of $3,117,500. The grant allowed the City to expand transit routes to the majority of the City of Richmond (minus the majority of District 4) for its existing citywide shuttle service through Richmond Moves utilizing zero emission vehicles.
 $300,000 Grant from CMO (current grant): The CMO program offered current grantees an opportunity to receive an additional $300,000 to support program expansion. The additional funding will allow Richmond Moves to expand city-wide, including District 4.

The Richmond Moves shuttle service will continue to utilize zero-emission electric vehicles, grouping multiple passengers heading in the same direction, and booking passengers into a shared vehicle, thereby improving efficiencies for both the rider and the city, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The new extended service will improve transit options for all residents within the City of Richmond.

SYNERGISTIC POLICIES:

Richmond First Mile/Last Mile Transportation Strategic Plan: A comprehensive strategy for mobility within the Richmond community that focuses on development and implementation of a first mile/last mile transportation network at three primary transportation hubs.

Link: https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/48476/Richmond-FLM-Plan-- Appendix
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Executed Standard Contract with Nomad Transit, LLC Attachment 2 – Clean Mobility Options Grant Approval
492

May 6, 2025
Attachment 3 – Proposed Contract Amendment 1
Attachment 4 – Richmond Moves Slide Deck
493

















 !



"#

$#%&#'(')*# +  ,-. +


/" +" +-/0#0$*(#/$0*/&11!!2
& ++
,!!3+

4' +'/" +" +*"* 2,$ "&5" ,& +"6* 278&",!!3 
&*

*2#
-0&&++
* 29-9: *&
*+  /!"  !

;1+ ++< +#)
=  

0*! , >? 9>?!  &! @ ! 2 >? !
+" 9>?!  &+" 9>? & . &1!9>?,  9 >? & . &1!&@+>+ ,2?9 >?">+ ,2?

A'/'/",, .&," +* +&   +1!++ &+. &&" ' 
B'2<  '* 2C+!2+*1&" +*+"!! =&D'* 2+"!!2,+. +"=& "*2<  1!++&"+@.&@2 "* 2*1 !* 2

'

E'*C+(@!
 +'*+"!!. &"++. +&21 "3F&+ @& "-. !5
=" @ 083" " +"&"&
+ &" @2,9+1@!!"+&&  +  & &" '

G'* 2H+(@!
 +'* 2+"!!F"*"+2+&+ @& "2. + +5
=" @ ;83" ""&"&
&" @2,9+1@!!"+&&  +  & &" ' 
IJKKLMNOPQRSTNURV WJSNXRRVRYZSJ[M\]SJ^RUO_`M`aRS
bJSNcSRRVRYdSJ[MeUNfSNUgKJMhfU`fLV ijklmnolYnpnq
kjljn
rst`MhRhVRSTNURSJLORVuJSORUgMJbJaPRM`dbRhNMORaS`ORhVRSTNURVuJSJMhRK`MhbJU`bRbRUOSNUVgLOObR iXNUgKJMh_JTRVm
vw_xyzXxvQ{z\WWI
klISJVdPQOSRRO\|bJJSo
vR[}JS~\v}kllk
€`SSROOZSNM~RS
ij‚mopnY‚kl a`SSROOfdSNM~RSeSNhR[NOgTN`fUJK
‚llnkpnq yRURKdRSk\olo‚
yRb`[`SRWWI
_`SUgk\olo‚
ƒLbP\olo
n\oj\lll
„
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 494











 













 
















  



 
!




" #

$


 


#

$






%









  



 
!


&

$$

'





 
  





()

$


 


)

$









!









  



 
!


&

$$

'





 
  




*

$
+ , &

 
$$-

)

$

$ 

$
'



./ 
 


 


/ 
 






0









  



 
!


 
12)
-



-


 

3 

*

/450/675%  55*
'

$  
    8 *  9
  


!
8
&



 :




$

-
$

    

$
* 8 * 
/

 

! 
 
$
*


 

 
 
$
%
)
-

* 
8 * 

 $
,
;<=>?@ABCABDEFAG@>F?HIFGDGJFDKLHHFJ?BM
N?JB?EDBOABPQQFQEDGEN?JB?EDBOQ>ARKSQFTGU?KAVW
 

! '*
 8 *

8 * 
$
*

  

%
)
-

*

5
* $
! 
  



)

X1X&
!  
  

  !
 -


&
 1
'


-

 



!
8
&



 :

Y






)

  
)

 &


!
0 
$5!!

  



Z/)5067
)*     )


$ 




 '
 

 



8















#

$

 



%
)

$

 





/ 
 

 



0 )

 [
\[
.Y]Y2"
^_`abcda^efcghhi
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED Manager
6/6/2024
Mayor
495
 



 

 







 !

 

"
##$"
"

 $% ##
 &"'
"


% "

"(# 
#
)

*+,-./0123.4+5167.8,9:;67.6</+,3.4+5167=>?@A:B1<B;5/+B1C<+2C67.6<2B15/+, *B;68./;67D6/,B4./03;.E-;:./;EFB1<B;5G*D3-FHI;E16<J./+;KLM5;/4+2B153.4+5167N8 @6O.B165,6/;E;67-155C6./0D6O,8/5,6/P<B,,5,6/G@-DPHQB;6/FB1<B;5R*+.8J.EE;51C6/ /1;6;77./.16;ESTIUVKILLL.62C67.6<21BV0,;B8128,BO.4,GKLM2B15*D3-F;67KLM2B15 @-DPHR 
WC67.6<J.EE,6;XE,3.4+5167=>?@A/1,9:;672B15J+;/.84CBB,6/E0;T8YC;B,5.E,Z16,/1 ;Z16,/+;/J.EE41O,B/+,,6/.B,-./0G8,,X,E1J21B/+,C:7;/,78,BO.4,5;:HR*+,8,BO.4,J.EE 8/.EE1:,B;/,=167;0[WB.7;02B15\;5[\:5RD61B7,B/1:B1O.7,8C22.4.,6/41O,B;<,21B;EE B,8.7,6/8E.O.6<J./+.6/+,-./0I2C67.6<J.EEX,5;.6E0;EE14;/,7/1J;B7.64B,;8.6</+,6C5X,B12 O,+.4E,+1CB8;67/+,6C5X,B12O,+.4E,8;4/.O,E016/+,B1;7R?,+.4E,8J.EE;E81X,2CEE0 ,E,4/B.2.,7;674+;B<.6<.62B;8/BC4/CB,J.EEX,.68/;EE,7/18C::1B//+,8,BO.4,R 
*+,:B1],4/8C::1B/8B,8.7,6/8.6B,;4+.6<5;]1B,5:E10,B;67,7C4;/.16;E7,8/.6;/.168;67 :B1O.7,8;4B./.4;E2.B8/[5.E,E;8/[5.E,4166,4/.16/1B,<.16;E/B;68./+CX8I.64EC7.6<^P3*I P5/B;_I;67/+,3.4+5167W,BB0*,B5.6;ER*+,-./0123.4+5167+;8;67J.EE416/.6C,/1J1B_ J./+4155C6./01B<;6.Z;/.168I8C4+;8WB.,678123.4+5167I-155.88.1616P<.6<IA/B;/,<.4 QB1J/+-1C64.EI;673.4+5167-155C6./0W1C67;/.16/17,,:E0,6<;<,E1J[.6415,;67

7.8;7O;6/;<,7B,8.7,6/8R

FB1],4/=;6;<,B
`>=Pa*3P`AD*IbbDocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 496
 











!"#



$%&'())*+,(-*.+/*+0&'*12
3456.78/9+8:)(&5;;<01=>?23458@'.AA%.@:*/)BC)(/(8+% .DE(89+8:)F.+&8&(.:5G:-H013458:/<(&%.DI(-'7.:/01J>? 348K+**&.-.AA8C.+8&*
&.@8+/)&'*(:(&(8&(.:.D<B)&.7*+L)/*78:/+*)F.:)*&+8:)(&)*+,(-*(:I(-'7.:/5<8A(D.+:(85 MNOPQRNSTUVWVXYZ[\TTN[]T[SV^NSY_RXTX`a`bO[[R[STNMTU[c`OT^[Vd 
eS`\\NOf`S\[g^TUTU[hbO[[R[STWiNR`fg^aacONj^f[kXVTNR[Og^TUT[\USNaNb_`Sf T[\USNaNb_l*:8CA*/(:&*K+8&(.:)*+,(-*)0&'*1




3458-&(:K8)8C+.m*+-..+/(:8&(:K&'*
V[Oj^\[VNMTU^Oflc`OT_V[Oj^\[cONj^f[OVTN[MM[\TX`T[TU[NSlf[R`SfTO`SV^TV[Oj^\[nTU[ 1
op>q?
34H6.78/@(AA-.:&+8-&@(&'&'(+/F8+&%)*+,(-*F+.,(/*+)&.*DD*-&B8&*)B-' ^ST[bO`T^NSW^S\aXf^Sbg^TUMa[[TR`S`b[OVWj[U^\a[VXcca^[OVWfO^j[Oc`OTS[OVWY`\rbONXSf\U[\r cONj^f[OVW\XVTNR[OV[Oj^\[VXccNOT`b[S\^[VW`c`_R[STcON\[VVNO`Sf^SVXO`S\[YONr[OV`Sf B:/*+@+(&*+)H6.78/L)s*+,(-*)@(AA(:-AB/*t

uvN\`a^w`T^NSNM`cONcO^[T`O_\aNXflY`V[ff_S`R^\j[U^\a[ONXT^Sb`SfO[`alT^R[ c`VV[Sb[O`bbO[b`T^NSV_VT[Rx
uh\\[VVTNTU[y^`RNY^a[O^f[O`cca^\`T^NSn^z{`SfhSfON^f|MNO^Sf^j^fX`aVXV^Sb &'*<B)&.7*+L))*+,(-*01I(/*+)34&.C..m8:/F8%D.++(/*)&'+.BK'8)78+&F'.:*} uh\\[VVTNT[a[cUNS^\YNNr^SbVMNO~^f[OVgUNfNSNTU`j[`\\[VVTN`VR`OTcUNS[x uh\\[VVTNTU[y^`RNY^a[fO^j[O`cca^\`T^NSMNOfO^j[OVTNONXT[`SfV[Oj^\[O^f[V TUONXbU`VR`OTcUNS[NOT`Ya[Tx
€)&8CA()'+*A8&(.:)'(F@(&',*'(-A*+*:&8A-.7F8:%01 
p
‚
34&.F+.,(/*
8--*))&.,*'(-A*).:8+*:&8AC8)()&.(:/*F*:/*:&-.:&+8-&.+/+(,*+F8+&:*+)01


‚
34@'.)'8AAF+.,(/*&+8:)F.+&8&(.:)*+,(-*)}
uh\\NRc`S_^SbT[\US^\`a`SfNc[O`T^NS`aVXccNOTV[Oj^\[x uƒ`Or[T^Sb`SfNXTO[`\U^S^T^`T^j[V`Vf[V\O^Y[fU[O[^Sd u„`T`VU`O^Sb`SfO[cNOT^Sb`Vf[V\O^Y[fU[O[^Sd 
kNSMa^\TVY[Tg[[STU^V{[Oj^\[zOf[O`Sf`S_NTU[OT[ORV`Sf\NSf^T^NSVNOgO^TT[S`bO[[R[STV Y[Tg[[STU[c`OT^[VVU`aaY[O[VNaj[f^SM`jNONMTU^V{[Oj^\[zOf[Od

†‡
ˆ‰Š
‹Œˆ‹#Ž‡ˆ‰ 

U[fXO`T^NSNMTU[„[caN_R[STVU`aaa`VTMNO`c[O^NfNMPQRNSTUVMNaaNg^SbTU[f`T[NMTU^V {[Oj^\[zOf[O0&'*1p
?345)BC*-&&.*‘&*:)(.:C%7B&B8A8K+**7*:&.D&'*F8+&(*).: T[ORVTNY[`bO[[fn^S\aXf^Sb`S_^S\O[`V[^SRNSTUa_M[[VMNO`ff^T^NS`aRNSTUV|d 
’†“ 

”•–—––˜™š›œ•–˜–›žŸ– –˜Ÿ›ž¡– ž¢œ•ž˜£› –›¤›–¥
 ¦haa\`c^T`a^w[fT[ORVXV[fYXTSNTf[M^S[fU[O[^SVU`aaU`j[TU[R[`S^SbV[TMNOTU^STU[ƒ`VT[O[ORV`Sf <.:/(&(.:)D.+E(89+8:)(&8)8s*+,(-*)(K:*/C%6.§8/8:/<B)&.7*+0&'*1 ?34H
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 497











 












  




 
 



 








  !





 


 "








# 


!
$%&'())) *





 


  














 

  

 + ,

-./0123456789:;7<9<

  + 

=





 $'&()))$>&())) 








 
?

$&)))))



  

*










 

 





@8A7.8AB8C7.D0-00<

  

 



+ 





 

 
,
EF
>=>&,$GG&H


EF
>'=&
,$I)I&


EF
&(='%,$I'%(



F


,+ 




 










 

$
()))
 



 


+ 





 


>( 
 












JKLMNOPKQRSTUVRQWWNVPQXNTYTOTZQN[U\Q\TLZNLPQNNQ]ZTUMN\VRQUVSRVYVPQR\PKQRSTVR^L_QO`U  +  
   
 




=



-a60b0C08c0

 





d


 




  

 






 
 

  
 




 

 

 
 
 







efghijklhmninohphiq

^L_QO]VNNWZLrVOTQPPTUU\LQWNQ\YLZ_UTZrVPTs\KTtuva9576wxy\KZLMSK]KVPKzVOTZU]VNNXT   {
 



=

|





}
 








E~07A6a4.D;7C06aA0€780 !
>I
‚

 ƒ


„


 


DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 498






 ! "! #$%
&'
'(')
**+',-)'.'
'('/)
**+'(''('/

'

"/+'!**''!
'+0/!'1!
)


2

'

('2'"*!'
'('!+'!''+!*
''!'+')''0/!'
1!31!)
**'/'44'"4'(5
'"!'
'"".
4'

4/"'6"
'+
4/3
789%9:&';'
4*'<.
')
**(('(*''("=+'*
4'/'

/'.'
4*'/+'!'.
*+*'
'"''442
.'<'/))
**
+'+*'

44'//'/'.'
4*'/('+'

'

/'''<*(!3;'
4*'/
)
**.'+
>'4>/(5
'/).'/"'4
(
'/4'?
'!'/3&).'
4*'/)
**
+')''*4
44'//
+*'.'
4*'/3&'"'
/)
**+'



(! ! "!3

1!)
**'/'''@'4
(''4'//'

/
/*
4'/

"'(!'
A'.
4'/)
'4"'
//
/4'('0/!'3

B
CDEF0/!'/**
'
(!>'.
*+*''"">

*)
!"*'.'


">

(''
4'(*''3&''"G*!/+'
/('*

''
/
''
+
'/('/'.
4'H'
'**+'*4')

)*>


/4'("+*
4*
44'//
+*'+!/**4!''?
""')
"66"3

IJKLMNOPQROSTUVMWOLXSXPO

1!)
**+''/"/
+*'('
'

(**'*'.'*'!'/('2'"*!'
4
/+/
/

'4/'('2'"*!')
**'/

'"Y'4!
'(
Z[\]^_`^a]bcZ[bdef
$Bg:h
D
Eijk[ak\lllbmnoapmnq]r`asbtZubmpvw_]Zapb`
)
**'/

'"Y'4!
'+''"
!"
(44)
1!
'

('2'"*!'cZ[bdx
:fBg:h
D
Eijvu[boapmnr`asbtZymzm{b`
)
**+'
'
*44)
'0/!'<Y'4
'

(!*/4'*'
"Y'4!''

/3

&'1!<Y'4
')
**+''!")'''466'4
/
/'*''
A'.
4'/)
**/'.'/'"
!"
(44)
'0/!'<Y'4
'



+/
/3&'1!<Y'4
')
**""
!'!+'/'<Y'4&'!//
/

'
'

('.
/'*'!'/('2'"*!'
4*'"'/'*)
'@"'
/'

/'.
4'/4"


'"''44
.''4'

/
'<*(!(*''
!
'4'"4'!'!>'

*
4/3
'.
4'(+'1!
<Y'4
')
**.'")'/'.'
4'!''|
''!'
/}'3

~'

"'*4(

'4/'('2'"*!'oapmnq]r`asbtZubmp
*'+'1!<Y'4
')
***

/')
'0/!'<Y'4
'.''>'
'*
.'+*'/(
/}'''.!@
!
H'


/'.
4'"
!
H
3

€JL‚WOLKSLQXOLƒO„‚
QLSQ‚MXU†‡ˆˆ‰Š‹SXS„OTOXQ

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 499
 





















 
 
















 








 

































 
 




 



 




  
! 
"#$%&'#($#(")*+,$"+-"#$%&'#).,"/+0#$1"
2

3



3



 






 






















!


 

 









456789:;<8=:7>9:?;:@<9:ABCCD:@

 






























 


E 


 







F
G





















 


















 
F
 


 














H5I;:J9@7<K?:DLD@7D<MNO?:9MM


 
F








F
 















2!







P 




 

QR$(ST#T("UV+W#$#TRXY&(Z[\*#UV+W#$#T
RXY&(ZR(SS#$0,"/R#,"#T+S]X&S/*##^('/-+$0(/V$+%&T#TRX  

 



 


_

 `

 
  
0(/#$&(]"aW#R"&/#"a(ST(SX%#*&']#W$(V"[\*#UV+W#$#TRXY&(ZR(SS#$W&]]*(%##b,(] 

 
F


 

 



F




Q






 




  

F

















QT#%#]+V#T'+S/#S//*(/V#$/(&S"/+Y&(1"R$(STa/#'*S+]+cXa(ST+V#$(/&+S"0,"/




_ `




















de





 

F



 


 






f 
F 

 















f
F

F
 
 _
 `
f



g







DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 500
 




       


 
 

  

   



!"##
$%&"%%'(
)
*  
+ 
 

  
 ,
-
 
 .


 

    / /
,


  0 + 

 
-
 /

 


 1 


/ 
 


    2
3

 
 
 


 
  4 /

 

+ +. 
 5  1,
6 +

5 



 

 


 



  1,6
 3





%
%7%"7
8(
9(&%'!

:%;'%<<
(
%7<
(
$($=
>%?; =@%$
)
A
 



  +
   


B3 3 
/


/

 ,
C 

 



  D4

   
     
,

E


 1 
+ 

 + 
 
 
F+

 ,1


+


 

 
,G 
/
1


0


0 
+      
0
,A/1

   ,
 
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 501


 








!"
#
$%%&'()*'+,-.//&-0,123'+&4
!"
#
5$'$678

9

!"
#

:

;:
#


#<

=#>
!=

!

?

@


;#=
<:

A

#

#:;
=#

<

!
!



"



=


B#C#:
<:D
=



=#
#

":>
#



#

E>


#
?

FGHIJKLMNOPMQRSTUUV

VWXOYLZ[IO\ZVGO]Y^[GV\LYJ_

`````````````````````````````````````````
E<

a
b>#
<

`````````````````````````````````````````
c
#



`````````````````````````````````````````
9


````````````````````````````````````````
E<

a
b>#
<

`````````````````````````````````````````
c
#



`````````````````````````````````````````
9


````````````````````````````````````````


b>#


````````````````````````````````````````


b>#


DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED Alex Lavoie
Manager
6/6/2024
Mayor
Eduardo Martinez
6/7/2024
502
 



























!
"
#
#$%
$%& '$
$

(
(

'% &$

)*%$ (
'+%,) '

-(.!
-'
/
%#01-$
/
23456789:;3<:7<6=45:>82?6@3486A2A;B8@64C242DEAF3<2G:H:F6A;45:I:IH:7<6=45:J67: K:2IL63@;H:8AM86@2486A6=45:N6A=8;:A482@84FO76M8<86A<8A45:K:7I<D 
PQ
 R


ST
K84@: U2I:
VWXYWZ[\Z]ZY^W _678`::<:ab76LA




cd

E<O2746=45:<:7M8N:eU6I2;!#(-f


!/-$--g-#-

$ (
(

'% &$

)*%$ (
'+%
J67:K:2Ie=6745:O37O6<:6=O:7=67I2AN:472Nh8AG2A;O76G72I:M2@32486ADK5:;24246H: <527:;L8@@H:2M28@2H@:8A45:>82iO:72486A<J:A4:72A;6A@F2M28@2H@:46I:IH:7<6=45:J67: K:2I8;:A48=8:;467:j387:2NN:<<DkA;:7@F8AG;242I2FA64H:<527:;45763G52AF645:7 I:456;452A>82iO:72486A<J:A4:72NN:<<DK5:;2428<N6A<8;:7:;472;:<:N7:4HF>82e2A;8< <3Hl:N44645:N6A=8;:A482@84F2A;645:7O764:N48M:O76M8<86A<<:4=67458A45:K:7I<D 
 m' $
n$o#-+%#1$

n$*-m' m
'$p-1/$

m'#g-np &q#/
'%rU6I2;L8@@O76M8;:45:=6@@6L8AG
;24242H@:<2A;;2<5H627;<8A45:=67I6=2GG7:G24:;>82iO:72486A<J:A4:77:O674<4524L8@@

m' g#/
/& ')*%$ (
'+%-nn
%%s

%
'
m '$%!#

'
&'
%

//-#psK5:7:O674<27:
2GG7:G24:;e;:a8;:A48=8:;2A;;6A648AN@3;:2AFO:7<6A2@8A=67I2486A6=`8;:7<D 



t
SuvvPcvSwux
PS
Q

 
yx



K6O_:M:@?:7M8N:iO:72486A<
z:478N<
{|}~|€‚|ƒ|„‚~
†„|‡ˆ†|ˆ}
„ƒ|‰|Š‹
ΠS

d


Ž45:4642@A3IH:76=244:IO4<
HF78;:7<46H66h278;:67;:@8M:7F=76I2A678G8A
462;:<48A2486AD
Œ v




‘, $-'#/

'
’*
%$%.(-/
;378AG<:7M8N:5637<D
Œ “
TŽ45:4642@A3IH:76=`8;:`:j3:<4<
45247:N:8M:;278;:O76O6<2@D
Œ “
Tv
‘”•
$–
(-1/+ *$ &” $-
'#/
'
’*
%$%r+-%-m
'n
1$-0
s
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 503
  








 

!

 
"


#

!
$
  
%


%& '()*+,-./.0120.34*5/*6
(7*/8-920.9.:5.3/3;4838,.9<.=/8>.?
 @

A&
BC !

 


!
!C!$
DCE!
F

G!

HIJKLMNOPMQJRPSJTPUVUWXYZ
[YTIP\M]Z^JZ_`YYX_[UVTL_UI
MKY\PWP\^JZMUWTLY`YYX
 a b&B
cd
de


f#





$
 b &

%

%gh

i & h
j


f
kd
de


$ $l!
l
l
k"
 @

A&
BcC !

 


!
!#
#
d
mn!
oVJKMLUTUWpQJRPTZUWMYIOP\Y
JV^IP^YIYqKYIPYV\Y
rUKsYOYRtYTIP\M
 uv
&w%

bh
&
BC 

!f!
!


!#
!



#"$
 uv
&w%

%&
BwcC 
 
!C

#


x

"$
 uv
&wy
z{h|&{
Bwb

&Bzckf 


 e

#

!f!

 
$
 b
}}~
%gh

v
iz€
h

C 

k

!e

#






!!C

#
#

f $
 b
}}~
iz€
h
v
uz h&c
C 

k




!

!
$
 y
z{h~
%gh

v
iz€
h
c
C 

k!f!
e

#





!f!!C

#
#

f $
 y
z{h~
iz€
h
v
uz h&cC 


k



!f!
!f!$
P^YI‚qKYIPYV\YHIJKLMƒWPRTYIJ]RY]Z^JZ_`YYX_[UVTL„  jC d


 jC d



 jC d
d 
 jC †f!‡f 



Gd
de

ˆ
‰JTJŠURQ[VMPVrJ]RY
 de
‹

 de
‹ˆ
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 504
 











 


 

  !"


 #$%&$ "'&& (%
 )*("+,-./"
 0" / .'!!"
 0" / .1 !
 0" / .1+./ !

 . +.'!!"

 . +.1

 . +.1./
  !-" &
  !
.&
  !
" +.2* .3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 505




















!"#!$%&
'
()

*)+
,,-&
)
./)0)

(1)+
0

1+
1)/

22

/

)

)
34 56789:
;<6==<>

?@776
A&
'0
B
C&
'0
B
C
3443D
EFG"$%&
)+



H
(

+2

I/
0 JKLEF#!$%
MN6==
<7
O7@@M976M<=
<7PM6Q8
<R=

7S=6M<T7U
9:
5V8<7W=6
7X
M
Q=S@7:W=U<
TU
YTORW7UQ>
5Z

#[\E]F#^L$%_

JKLEF#!
GF#`
aL]
Eb
acdFE^"

JKLEF#!

^LaL]
][#
e
LGL#
Eb
^cE![E!GLaE^`
aL]

JKLEF#!
ELac#

""!#KK`
ffg
ahac
#^L#!

\GiG

acdFE^"


jfkgf

JKLEF#!

FGa\`
@76Tl6==8=mOT_6TORW7UQ_OM_V8

#!F`
nR=
QV6M<T7U
7X
<R=
o=S@7:W=U<
8RM@@
@M8<
VU<T@
<R=
@M8<
QM:
7X
<R=
OM@=UQM6
W7U<R
QV6TUN
PRTOR
M
S=6T7Q
7X
pq
X67W
<R=
8=6rTO=
@MVUOR>
8V9s=O<
<7
=t<=U8T7U
9:

WV<VM@
MN6==W=U<
7X
<R=
SM6<T=8
7U
<=6W8
<7
9=
MN6==Q
uTUO@VQTUN
MU:

TUO6=M8=
TU

W7U<R@:

X==8
X76
MQQT<T7UM@
W7U<R8v_

#!hac#K`
5V8<7W=6
PT@@
6=O=Tr=
MOO=88
<7
<R=
8<MUQM6Q
wTM
;7@V<T7U
MUQ
MV<7WM<TO
87X<PM6=
VSQM<=8>
O7WS6T8=Q
7Xx

yz{
?V@@:
@7OM@T|=Q
S67S6T=<M6:
67V<TUN
MUQ
WM<ORTUN
M@N76T<RW8
<RM<
MUM@:|=
M@@
<6TS
6=}V=8<8>
M88TNU
6TQ=68
Q:UMWTOM@@:

<7
<R=
9=8<~8VT<=Q
r=RTO@=>
MUQ
N67VS
SM88=UN=68
R=MQ=Q
TU
<R=
8MW=
QT6=O<T7U
TU<7
=XXTOT=U<
8RM6=Q
6TQ=8
S7P=6=Q
9:

7WMQ€
1)+


+
/
‚

yƒ{
„U<=N6M<=Q
6=8=6rM<T7U
8:8<=W
<7
MOO=S<
MUQ
8OR=QV@=
<6TS8
977
=Q
TU
6=M@
<TW=>
TU
MQrMUO=>
76 7U
M
6=OV66TUN
9M8T8†

y‡{
o7PU@7MQM9@=
Tˆ;
MUQ
ZUQ67TQ
6TQ=6
MSS8
<RM<
M@@7P
OV8<7W=68
<7
977

6TQ=8>
<6MO

r=RTO@=8
TU
6=M@
<TW=>
SM:

X76

<6TS8>
MUQ
<67V9@=8R77<
MU:

T88V=8_
nR=
6TQ=6
MSS8
8RM@@
9=
Q=QTOM<=Q
<7
<RT8
o=S@7:W=U<_
?76
<R=
Mr7TQMUO=
7X

Q7V9<>
<R=
6TQ=6
MSS8
V8=Q
TU
O7UU=O<T7U
PT<R
<R=
n6MU8T<~
M8
M~;=6rTO=
unZZ;v
;=6rTO=
ˆ6Q=6
=U<=6=Q
TU<7
9=<P==U

5V8<7W=6
MUQ
7WMQ
PT@@
U7<
9=
V<T@T|=Q
TU
O7UU=O<T7U
PT<R
<RT8
o=S@7:W=U<†

y‰{
Z
P=9~9M8=Q
977
TUN
S76<M@
<7
977

<6TS8†

yŠ{
o7PU@7MQM9@=
Q6Tr=6
MSS
<RM<
S67rTQ=8
=XXTOT=U<
<V6U~9:~<V6U
QT6=O<T7U8†
<R=
MSS
M@@7P8
Q6Tr=68
<7
8<M6<
MUQ
=UQ

Q6TrTUN
<TW=>
8OR=QV@=
96=M
8>
MUQ
O7U<MO<
@Tr=
8VSS76<†

y‹{
ZOO=88
<7
<R=
wTM
ˆS=6M<T7U8
57U87@=
u $v>
PRTOR
M@@7P8
MQWTUT8<6M<768
<7
S=6X76W
M
rM6T=<:
7X
XVUO<T7U8>

TUO@VQTUN
977
TUN
<6TS8>
OR=O
TUN
<6TS
Q=<MT@8>
MQsV8<TUN
MOO7VU<
TUX76WM<T7U>
MUQ
S67rTQTUN
OV8<7W=6
8VSS76<>
MUQ

MOO=88TUN
6=S76<8>
M8
S67rTQ=Q
X76
TU
ZSS=UQTt
Π
MUQ

y{
ZOO=88
<7
<R=
QM<M
6=S76<TUN
8=<
7V<
TU
ZSS=UQTt
Œ>
WMQ=
MrMT@M9@=
rTM
<R=
wˆ5_

J[[E!L
#!hac#K
Ž
^KLG\\GLaE^
7WMQ
S67rTQ=8
TU8<M@@M<T7U
8VSS76<
X76
VS
<7
X7V6
P==
8 MX<=6
<R=
o=S@7:W=U<
9=NTU8

8=6rTUN
YTQ=68>
O7U8T8<TUN
7Xx

yz{
7OM@T|M<T7U
X76
<R=
o=S@7:W=U<
‘7U=
uQ=XTU=Q
9=@7Pv>
TUO@VQTUN
7S<TWT|TUN
<R=
M@N76T<RW>
O7UXTNV6TUN
9MO
~=UQ>

MUQ
Q=XTUTUN
MOO=S<M9@=
STO
~VS
MUQ
Q67S
7XX
S7TU<8†

yƒ{
n=8<TUN
MUQ
}VM@T<:

M88V6MUO=†

y‡{
’=@STUN
5V8<7W=6
<7
9VT@Q
M
@MVUOR
S@MU
MUQ
6TQ=6
MO}VT8T<T7U
8<6M<=N:†
MUQ

y‰{
„U8<6VO<T7U
X76
Q6Tr=68>
QT8SM<OR=68>
MUQ
WMUMN=68
7U
7WMQ€
I
1)


)
(

/)H+

H11


J[[E!L
#!hac#K
Ž
^“Ea^“
nR=
X7@@7PTUN
8=6rTO=8
M6=
TUO@VQ=Q
TU
<R=
X==8
VS
<7
<R=
UVW9=6
7X
R7V68
S=6
W7U<R

TQ=U<TXT=Q
9=@7Px

yz{
ˆS=6M<T7UM@
8VSS76<
MUQ
8:8<=W
MQsV8<W=U<8x
„UO@VQ=8
M@N76T<RW
MQsV8<W=U<8
MUQ
ORMUN=8
<7
rT6<VM@
9V8
8<7S8
”

STO
VS
S7TU<8
M<
6=}V=8<
7X
5V8<7W=6x
•–
—˜
™š
›˜•œ
–žœ
Ÿ˜ —›

yƒ{
¡tS=6<
O7U8V@<TUNx
•–
—˜
¢
›˜•œ
–žœ
Ÿ˜ —›

£
G!¤#La^“
G^"
“!E¥Ldx
R=@S
8=<<TUN
VS
O7WS@=t
S67W7<T7U8>
6=rT=P
MUQ
M88T8<MUO=
X76
<RT6Q
SM6<:
<77@8

<RM<
OMU
TU<=N6M<=
TU<7
7WMQ€



£
[#!GLaE^K`
„UO@VQTUN
8VSS@:
7S<TWT|M<T7U
MUM@:8T8>
SM:W=U<
¦
X6MVQ
TUr=8<TNM<T7U>
MUQ
9V8TU=88

OM8=”VUT<
=O7U7WTO8
MUM@:8T8

£
#!hac#
#§[G^KaE^`
„UO@VQTUN
X=M8T9T@T<:

MUM@:8T8
X76
8=6rTO=
=tSMU8T7U8
76 MQQT<T7UM@
S67s=O<8

y‡{
n=OR
;VSS76<x
o=QTOM<=Q
7WMQ
S7TU<
7X
O7U<MO<
PT@@
V8=
O7WW=6OTM@@:
6=M87UM9@=
=XX76<8
<7
6=8S7UQ
PT<RTU
7U=

9V8TU=88
QM:

X76
U7U~O6T<TOM@
T88V=8
uVS7U
6=O=TS<
7X
M
Q=<MT@=Q
Q=8O6TS<T7U
7X
<R=
T88V=
M8
6=}V=8<=Q
9:
7WMQv
MUQ

<7
=U8V6=
<RM<
M88T8<MUO=
T8
S67rTQ=Q
PT<RTU
M
6=M87UM9@=
<TW=
X6MW=_
7WMQ
PT@@
M@87
S67rTQ=
5V8<7W=6
PT<R
MU

MSS67S6TM<=
ORMUU=@
X76
M@=6<TUN
7WMQ
<7
8:8<=W
7V<MN=8
76 7<R=6
O6T<TOM@
T88V=8>
PT<R
6=8S=O<
<7
PRTOR
7WMQ

PT@@
S67rTQ=
=W=6N=UO:

M88T8<MUO=_

¨˜Ÿ©ª
«¬­­
˜—¬®¯
°•—˜Ÿžœ
¨
°•—˜Ÿžœ
¬
«¬—›¬
™
›˜•œ
˜®
ž±²žžª¬ ³
—›ž
²©––žª
›˜•œ­¯
­¬Ÿ¬—
˜
´–žœ©—¬˜ ©­
µ•––˜œ—
© ª

µ¯—žŸ
¶ª·•—Ÿž —
© ª¸˜œ
°˜ •­—¬ ³
µžœ¹¬²žº
»®
œž¼•ž—žª½
›˜•œ
¾ž¯˜ ª
—›˜ž
ž—
˜•—
©¾˜¹ž
«¬­­
¾ž
²›©œ³žª
˜
©

›˜•œ­¯
œ©—žº

y‰{
ZQQT<T7UM@
;=6rTO=8_
7WMQ
OMU
S67rTQ=
7S<T7UM@
MQQ~7U
8=6rTO=8>
TUO@VQTUN
O7U8V@<TUN>
XTt=Q
67V<=
6=X=66M@>
@Tr=

MN=U<
8VSS76<>
WV@<T~W7QM@
76 <RT6Q
SM6<:
<6TS
S@MUU=6
TU<=N6M<T7U8>
W=QTM
MUQ
MQr=6<T8TUN
8=6rTO=8>
WM6
=<TUN

8VSS76<>
76 MOO=88
<7
7V6
Y=WTt¿
<6MU8T<
S@MUUTUN
87X<PM6=
X76
MU
MQQT<T7UM@
X==_
À76=
Q=<MT@8
MrMT@M9@=
VS7U

6=}V=8<_

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 506








 
 

!

"
"#$ "#"%
&
'
! (
# " 
 )
& # &
*

+ 

&" ,!

"

& -"$ " #
,
"
( )
&
!
!
) 
#% ! &
'
! (
# "#$  !
,),"#+ #, $#% .(
!
/$#% !
! )

$.",0  -"$12 345637382 94: ;7<=3:34> ?<@9? 3423>AB2C 34 <7:87 B< D88B D6B69??E 9>788:
!# $
"$ #
F
G H


I J &
"
 ) &
!
K
,+ -"$
$

, 


"
$ &

/"# LM    %

N
F O# 
$

 
%%

" P
$, M"#
#"#,

N
+

N
 )
!
$, "#
#"#,
 ,#"#
$
"
$ #)
"# ". &
#"

) &

N
F L
N
 )
"$$#" )
"

 "( .
.K
,  "$$#"
)

F
Q RS
 RT

UF *&
)

 
 )
& "./
$ # #, $
"#( 

$  &
&
$ !"
( !"(
# !
,

F
-"$
)", "
"# #
$,#  

,
#$
$ !"(
# !
,

"#$ 



!#.
)

#

#% "# "%


#
& ,& !"(
# !
,

# 
$

 .
".
 !
,
 ,

$ ,"
$ !"(
#F
V


&" !"( -"$ &
) 
#% W

 )
&
*

+ .K
, "
"(  &
M# M#& ( W


  .

X

V US Y
 Z
[
T

U \
O#" "# W

]^_+___ P"(".
!# %##% ) &
`
$

a
bS V
c
"
d !

e/
&,
)

 f W
de^ /
&,
X ]d+___ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&
& " # ) ]g+___
!

#& hF
F ge/
&,
#i
f W
jed_ /
&,
X ]j__ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&
f W
ddedk /
&,
X ]^k_ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&

l.K
,  " # ) ]d+___ !

#& hF
" g
=8A3@?8 D343D6Dm nBA8 oa

 a
bS Vpm
J$/"#,
J##" P"(
# #
",,
$"#,

& !"
"%
"!& d
.


c
"
g !

e/
&,
)

 f W
de^ /
&,
X ]d+_k_ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&
& " # ) ]g+g__
!

#& hF
F ge/
&,
#i
f W
jed_ /
&,
X ]jg_ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&
f W
ddedk /
&,
X ]^q_ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&

J$/"#,
J##" P"(
# #
",,
$"#,

& !"
"%
"!& d
.


c
"
^ !

e/
&,
)

 f W
de^ /
&,
X ]d+d_k !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&
& " # ) ]g+gd_
!

#& hF
F ge/
&,
#i
f W
jed_ /
&,
X ]jj_ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&
f W
ddedk /
&,
X ]^r_ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&

J$/"#,
J##" P"(
# #
",,
$"#,

& !"
"%
"!& d
.


c
"
j !

e/
&,
)

 f W
de^ /
&,
X ]d+ds_ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&
& " # ) ]g+^g_
!

#& hF
F ge/
&,
#i
f W
jed_ /
&,
X ]js_ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&
f W
ddedk /
&,
X ]jd_ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&

J$/"#,
J##" P"(
# #
",,
$"#,

& !"
"%
"!& d
.


c
"
k !

e/
&,
)

 f W
de^ /
&,
X ]d+gg_ !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&
& " # ) ]g+jj_
!

#& hF
F ge/
&,
#i
f W
jed_ /
&,
X ]jtk !

/
&,
!

,"
#$"
#&
J$/"#,
J##" P"(
# #
",,
$"#,

& !"
"%
"!& d
.


DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 507
















 !"!#$#%#
$"

&
'()
"
*+
,-./0
1-


2
3 0
1






3 4




05

456

7


8

9 :0
1

5

;

0;
5

2
<
<


5




04


0


=
=
8
4

4-

 
05


4
2

>%?@
"AB%""$
CBB>8<DE
0=

 


46 
60

0
10
4

F
5
0




E



9
<

 

4
0=.

4
6 
60


0

 
4G0

<DE

 



6 
60

05



4
4




4

9
<

H










4



0
41



3 

;

0;
5

.:0

=

IJKLMNKOPQJRMILSTONUVWJXORRJIJNYJRMIJSYWKZYW[MNVW\] "
*^'$B_`abcdOVWONefXSTKMRVWJXSVJMRKZYWONgMOYJh DE


0
54

0
;
590
i





:0
E


 



0
1






4


05

0
=



00=
4





0
0
1



0
<

jklmnopqrlstusllopktppklotrvwlxyzqx{lolpqnpxy|vvly}x~xootpxo€t{pqspqmnopqrls‚ƒqpkxyonƒopty{lty} €qsrtp„


qrt}oktww{tw{nwtplpkl†llo}nl„†qspkltzqx}ty{lq€}qnƒp‚‡xˆpklynrƒlsq€zlkx{wlovlsrqypk€qsvnsvqoloq€pkl tƒqzl€llooktwwƒlpklrt~xrnrynrƒlsq€}xopxy{pzlkx{wloxyvnpƒmnopqrlspktpnolpkl‰xtŠqwnpxqyqytyuxzly}t qzlspkl{qnsolq€pkltvvwx{tƒwl{twly}tsrqypkty}‡xxˆxypkllzlyppkl}nstpxqyq€pkl‹lvwqrlyp}qloyqpl~t{pwrtp{k {twly}tsrqypko‚rqypkw€lloŒxwwƒlvsqstpl}€qspkl€xsopty}qswtop{twly}tsrqypkoq€pkl‹lvwqrlyp‚totvvwx{tƒwl‚oq pktpmnopqrlsŒxwwqywƒl{ktsul}€qspklvqspxqyq€on{krqypko}nsxyuŒkx{kpkl‰xtŠqwnpxqyŒtotztxwtƒwlpqƒlnol}€qs pkl‹lvwqrlyp„

mnopqrlsoktwwslxrƒnsoltwwpstzlwl~vlyoloq€
qrt}vlsoqyylw€qsvnsvqoloq€pkl‹lvwqrlyp„Žyoptwwtpxqyslwtpl} olszx{lo}lo{sxƒl}tƒqzlŒxwwxyxpxtwwƒlvls€qsrl}slrqplw‚ty}x€ qrt}}llroxpyl{loots‚xyvlsoqyƒ
qrt}vlsoqyylw
€qstwxrxpl}vlsxq}tsqny}wtny{k„jklslt€pls‚olszx{loŒxww{qypxynlpqƒlvls€qsrl}slrqplwtotvvwx{tƒwl‚vsqzx}l}pktp

qrt}‘’“”••‘–—˜•™‘“‘•šš”›œ“š”‘’ž“–”—˜šŸ”• ”’˜¡¡ŸšŸ”•˜–š’Ÿ“œ”•’‘˜“”•˜™–‘’‘¢œ‘“š£ 
jŒxwxq„¤sx{lxy{wn}loqnsulylsx{vt{¥tul€qsjŒxwxq{qop€qs¦Š§Šyqpx€x{tpxqyoty}¨„©rxynploq€jŒxwxqzqx{lpxrlvls sx}l‚tptrt~xrnrq€ª«„«©vlssx}lqytzlstul€qstwwsx}lo{qrvwlpl}Œxpkxylt{k{twly}tsrqypk„|y{qopotooq{xtpl} ŒxpkjŒxwxqxyl~{looq€ª«„«©vlssx}lŒxwwƒlƒxwwl}pqpklmnopqrlstotp{qopvwno¨«¬qytrqypkwƒtoxo„ 
­'
"?!"®¯9

°
5
E
=
=
±9
LMdJIJXPT²OSh³WJ]LMdJIJXPT²OSbPSNNJI[ZKVPJZKJXMNQT




3
4

=5D.E
=




1

°
5
.

0
12=0
QO[OVJXVMcLIONVJXYMQQSVJISQ´XOUOVSQ[SVJIOSQK´dJPKOVJK´SNXSNTgJWOYQJdISLKh³WJ]LMdJIJXPT²OSbPSNNJIdOQQWSgJ

µ0


¶

1

5


1
¶<D5




=
10




0=



E


¶

1
0




=0
=5


:0
<
%??!
!
"
B'#+¯
<i
±
1 <

28i
±
1 <70=·











.DE




7


.
4 




<9


7 

E


0





.40



=





4 5


=



61


.
=0


µ0


=5

54



4
4

¸
70





E




:0




<DdOQQUISNV¹ZKVM[JIKZPKYIOLVOMN´SYYJKK´SNXZKJIOUWVK\]ºKJ»OUWVKbcRMI 



4 



5
5



4 


F
<

2=8G




6


<H



E





4

¸
70
.D




.

3 0




0
1

9
:0





40
E





4

:0





0=




.



.0=·





0
D¼K
½

5½

59
4i
<:0

=

5

=
4
5
1

5

5



0
1





=


E



=
E.044



D
1

E405
4


0
<

-<°



<DE


15

1


5
3







61


.D




=

5:0
5
1
2

0
105
4 .


45
:0


845
³ISNKLMIV¾NYOXJNVdWJIJ]³ISNKLMIV¾NYOXJNVb[JSNKSNTSYYOXJNV´ONYOXJNVMIMVWJIKOVZSVOMNONgMQgONUSNT DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 508





































 






































!









 

!






"#












!



$

$
"

%"




!



$"








&





























!
"



'











(

 





)!*+,-./0123456789:;<-:=<>/?-/@ABCB/?./@/<D:D?DE-E-./@F<B/?/G<D/?B.:==.:H/-./ 

"I





"


JKLMN1OMJPQ1RRS    SQ1TKUOQSVLKJN

WXY WXY

JZ42Y JZ42Y

1[\]2Y 1[\]2Y

NZ\2Y NZ\2Y

M^^2_`[ab\cP23d[e2K3`23

fKSg52Z_`NZ\ZPhZ3[_i

Mg\hc3[j2`k5235
l./m/=EF/n.<m<-B/-BGE@-.-./A/Am/@BEG-./9CB-EA/@oB09E@/l/:A6EG;/@BEDD/=F.E:@/?/B<pD:-/?:C-.E@<>/?CB/@BEG-.q' 
<Dr=C?<Dp:rr/BB-E-./?:-:?/-:<=/?m/=EF,-./0Sc3212Z4678srr/BB-E-./tu9<BrED?<-<ED:=C;ED9CB-EA/@DE-<Gv<Dpw 












w







"







x
woBrEDB/D-8

yah[z[\b{
Sc3212Z4

Y
 

x
|wY*
 wY|




 wY










$









$

















}







;/@BEDD/=:BB/rED?:@vCB/@B,0P2ec_`Z3Xk523567-E-./tu98s==9E@/l/:A:D?~/rED?:@vB/@BF<==m/BCm€/r--E9CB-EA/@oB






?<Br=EBC@/Em=<p:-<EDB‚:B?/Br@<m/?<D-./l/@AB8ƒE@-./:HE<?:Dr/EG:Dv?ECm-‚9CB-EA/@oB9E@/l/:A 








 /rED?:@vB/@BED=v-E-.//n-/D-BCr.;/@A<BB<ED<BD//?/?GE@-./9CB-EA/@oB DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 509




   
 


 

         

    
 
    
 

     
  
 

    
   



      
   

!"#$%&'() *+(%,"$%-

      
 . 
   
  / 
01 23453 6347789 :591897; <9 7=8 8>897 7=?7

 
    
@2?37A 5283?753 BC*+(%,"$%DE 75 5283?78 7=8 F82G5AH897I JK175H83 1=?GG 235>4L8   

 M N

 O  

 P   
 /  
M   P
 01


 
 M   
 . 
 O 
 
  M 

 

   
 . 



  
 M N

 O


 

 

 
.M

75 7=8 Q283?75301 78?HI 6=4:= 64GG R8 :5914L838L S8:59L?3A T1831 U53 ?GG 2K325181; V1 R876889 JK175H83 ?9L   


 

   
 M   
  MW   
 . 


X,", Y#,%&Z[ \],Z

N 



   
 
  64GG H?^8 ?::811 75 L?7? ?>?4G?RG8 75 H8HR831 5U 7=8 JK175H8301 J538 _8?HI   @?K7=534`8L JK175H8301 S8:59L?3A T183B1E ?9La53 Q283?753B1EI U53 7=8 2K32518 5U 3818?3:= ?9L 235b3?H 8>?GK?7459 U53 7=8 




  

 
  
 .M
     
 

 
 
 
 


c     N  

  

  
 M   
  d  



  
   

 

  


   
  
 

 
c   

 N/ e

 01 <978GG8:7K?G f352837A g4b=71 ?9L 7=8 234>?:A 5U 34L831I  

 


  
  

 


    
 
 

.M
h
i  jkl

h .
c 
  

j k
 l

 
  





 

 
   
  


  




  d

   
  /


i
 mh 

 

    
  
  


 
  /
 



  

 

 


      
  
  @
 nN

@
@

    

 
  P  01 L41:387459;
  

   
    
o

Ypqrstp u\s X Yvw* qX
X,-#x$,%) q(+$%" y("%&z-
Y(%{&z( *+(%,"&$Z-
y("%&z- | }%,+#-
i

 P
i ~P  

i 

i 
 ~
i

 
i

 ~ ~
i

 ~ ~P 
i N ~
i
 €
i 
c
q&)(% p+(%&(Zz(
y("%&z- | }%,+#-

i N ~

i N ~ ~
i N k
 ‚


 ƒ„
†‡ˆ†‰Š
‰„
†‡ˆ† ‹ˆ†Œ„ˆ‹
‡Ž
i N ~
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 510

 




 




 




 




  !"#$%%&"'!('")%*+, -./01213456
7051.89:21;<69  
=>  

?
 

?
>

 >


 -./0-;5.@A
7051.89;@/21;<69 = 

B

=C= 
=B

=C= 

D= 
=D= EF
= =
F
= G/H;@80/ I10J33K.@A7051.89
:21;<69 LM!"$%%&(*N%*+,O 
 =
P
 Q
B

== Q
>===  
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 511
 














!
"#$%!
&'"(



)%



*
!

"+ )%
,-./-!" 0//

"1.
2##3"$45
-#+
6
(1 #78!

$4

2##3"$4
9:;<=>?@ABCDE
F "4"$0++ 

F "4"$G!
HG#$4
%

"$!
"#$0++ 

%

"$!
"#$G!
HG#$4
0/

!.8"/3
:'"(
!$/.!
"#$'"(
6#*-#I'"(
"+8 "/
"+%"

!$/
"+%
!
"#$J("$K
"+!
"$4

LMN



"+ )%
0//#
$
!
"#$%!

'#
!.


'#
!.#(:.
+"+

'#
!.!$/..!
"#$

'#
!.6#*-#I

LN
L

% "O)%
% "O 6!(
% "O P(!".
0/
"O*
!

'#
!.*-"7
Q#

0O4R*-"7
Q#

8 %!9
0O4R*-"7
Q#

S #(S"

0 "4$($
8 %!9
0O4R2 !3Q#

8 %!9
'#
!.0//:
+"+

0O4R!
"$4S #("+

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 512
















 


!"


#





#$%

!&#$%

'
#$%
( )*+,-./012
345675879:;<=
>9?:9@AB<>>9?:6>9C
>9;<>A6=DA<AE9
FG3HIJ=6A9CKA5A9@
<=7LM




%
'"


N$

!&OO
P
N!Q


R




!


SR




S!

T"
UV
W
$

UV
!W



DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 513









!"# $%&'(()
**+,&-'./01$213,4

#*5
167
#8
7*99**:$&'1!;' '1%

<

=> #'$1#?=/!!#1%%?





 
@
A
1'*B C
 D@
<ED


A

 F
 GC

H 
C

=I1%J#&K'&
$
-'.1,11LM1.&J41,11%3N&!1,11% $!O
#"
' 4M1.&J41P
2#%?
" Q)
!1;2 #R

DAS
SAHT

U
=VV?
>WXWY
Q5+*9+Z[
).&J \
3](^9^5+_9+Z[

`A
C

AU
Y $8
-/1#&J 3
W/W
aaaY#
!6 R3

167
#83
7*99[b
c&#1N
2'&$\d_9a^99ZBZ[
/)PN
2'&$\d_9a*999[aa
/JJ
2$'d_+b[9^BZZBZBB
;6&-')
!1_YX,/:;[

"
' 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 514









 



 !"#$$%&$'()*+
,,
-!.
/,01!
2+-/34/3!
!/,/343!
56789:56;8<=(5&$>9?&$?@$75&9@?<9A8B&%$C%9D%%&9=%E?@98%AF?A56G<95C%@HFIJIHF?AD%KK?A?KKA'CA%L'%&9 

3.-
/3
3+3

MN+

! -/NN
-!.

NO+!
"#B@%%(%&9)*+
!
3 !/POP
!M

!O/,

-/ "7'A95(%@)*Q/3!RR ">%@S8<%T@5S8$%@)*U 
V=%E?@98%A?<W&5DK%$B%?&$?B@%%9=?9>%@S8<%T@5S8$%@8A?A%@S8<%E@5S8$%@65@9=%E'@E5A%A569=%7?K865@&8? /

33.-O-! !
"77T#)*N,/33.-O
X!-! !
"7T;#)*UY

3.-
3/.
3-
3!,

9=?989Z8['&$%@A9?&$A9=%@'K%AF@%A9@8<985&AF@%L'8@%(%&9AF?&$$%68&8985&A569=%77T#?&$7T;#F?&$Z88[ '&$%@A9?&$A?&$D8KK<5(EK:D89=9=%@%A9@8<985&AA%965@9=8&9=%77T#F7T;#F?&$9=8A#$$%&$'(\ 
]89=@%AE%<995E%@A5&?K8&65@(?985&<5KK%<9%$?&$E@5<%AA%$C:>%@S8<%T@5S8$%@E'@A'?&9959=%#B@%%(%&9Z9=% "T%@A5&?K^&65@(?985&)*+Y

3.-
3/.
3NN&59_

Z?[>%KK9=%T%@A5&?K^&65@(?985&`
ZC[>=?@%9=%T%@A5&?K^&65@(?985&65@<@5AAa<5&9%b9C%=?S85@?K?$S%@98A8&BE'@E5A%A` Z<[;%9?8&F'A%F5@$8A<K5A%9=%T%@A5&?K^&65@(?985&F%b<%E9?A&%<%AA?@:65@9=%AE%<868<C'A8&%AA E'@E5A%AK8A9%$8&cde95cfdeP
N/M/3O/!
3P

4
34/
4
-,
!
3!
gX3

!/3
?A59=%@D8A%E%@(899%$C:9=%77T#5@7T;#_
dhT%@65@(8&B9=%A%@S8<%A$%A<@8C%$8&9=%#B@%%(%&9FD=8<=8&<K'$%C'9?@% &59K8(89%$959=%(?8&9%&?&<%?&$A%@S8<8&B56'A%@?<<5'&9AFE@5S8A85&56<'A95(%@A%@S8<%?&$ A'EE5@9FE@5<%AA8&B569@?&A?<985&A?&$E?:(%&9AFS%@868<?985&56'A%@8&65@(?985&FE@5S8A85&56 ?&?K:98<AA%@S8<%AF$?9?A95@?B%F9@?8&8&BF?&$9=%6'K68KK(%&956A8(8K?@A%@S8<%A5&C%=?K6569=% 7'A95(%@`
ddhi&A'@8&BA%<'@89:?&$8&9%B@89:56A%@S8<%AF8&<K'$8&BC'9&59K8(89%$95 $%C'BB8&B?&$59=%@D8A%@%E?8@8&B9=%A%@S8<%A95@%A95@%8&9%&$%$A%@S8<%6'&<985&?K89:` dddhj&$%@9?W8&B8&9%@&?K@%A%?@<=65@9%<=&5K5B8<?K$%S%K5E(%&9?&$ $%(5&A9@?985&`
dfhj&$%@9?W8&B?<98S898%A958(E@5S%F'EB@?$%F5@%&=?&<%9=%A%@S8<%A` fh>=5@9a9%@(9@?&A8%&9'A%AFE@5S8$%$9=?9E%@A5&?K8&65@(?985&8A&59 $8A<K5A%$959=8@$E?@98%AZ8\%\FE?@98%A9=?9?@%&599=%(A%KS%AA%@S8<%E@5S8$%@A5@<5&9@?<95@A[?&$ /!

!/P
N-/

3g43/,N
/3/!
3M
N!
3!
-/

3g
bE%@8%&<%5'9A8$%9=%8@
<'@@%&98&9%@?<985&AD89=9=%C'A8&%AA`?&$
fdh#$S%@98A8&B?&$(?@W%98&BA%@S8<%AF8&<K'$8&B9=%?'$898&B56A'<=A%@S8<%AF ?A?'9=5@8k%$5@$8@%<9%$C:9=%7'A95(%@F?&$?AE%@(899%$'&$%@9=%77T#5@7T;#\ Z$[i&B?B%8&?&:?<98S89:E@5=8C89%$C:?&:59=%@E@5S8A85&569=%77T#?&$7T;#<'@@%&9K:8&%66%<9\ >%@S8<%T@5S8$%@<K?8(A&55D&%@A=8E5@59=%@E@5E@8%9?@:@8B=9A8&?&:569=%T%@A5&?K^&65@(?985&\7'A95(%@ B@?&9A>%@S8<%T@5S8$%@9=%@8B=995?<<%AAF(5$86:F?&$'A%9=%7'A95(%@l?9?65@9=%E'@E5A%56E%@65@(8&B Y

3.-
3/.
3g/PNX!/

39=%#B@%%(%&9F8&<K'$8&B95E@5S8$%9=%>%@S8<%A?&$8&<8$%&9?K95E@5S8$8&B 9=%>%@S8<%AF958(E@5S%9=%>%@S8<%AF?&$95<@%?9%$%@8S?98S%D5@WAF8&<K'$8&B?BB@%B?9%<5&A'(%@8&65@(?985& ?&$$%8$%&9868%$$?9?F959=%%b9%&9A'<='A%A?@%E%@(899%$C:9=%77T#?&$7T;#\ 
>%@S8<%T@5S8$%@A=?KK&5986:7'A95(%@8689$%9%@(8&%A9=?989<?&&5K5&B%@(%%989A5CK8B?985&A'&$%@9=%77T# 5@7T;#\7'A95(%@=?A9=%@8B=9F'E5&&598<%56?9K%?A9A8b9:ZmJ[$?:AF959?W%@%?A5&?CK%?&$?EE@5E@8?9%A9%EA 95A95E?&$@%(%$8?9%?&:'&?'9=5@8k%$'A%56T%@A5&?K^&65@(?985&\ 
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 515
 






 




































 








!"#$%"%&'!&()%(*$+'!,&-'.+'+)%!&%//%0'12+#!'+$!3%4'%)"-*-%45*'&,'4%/!&%4.%)%!&-.+$$.+6%'.%"%+&!&(- -%'/,)'.!&'.%7()%%"%&'18&'.%%6%&',/+&9!&0,&-!-'%&095%':%%&'.%#),6!-!,&-,/'.!-744%&4*"+&4'.% 7()%%"%&';'.%#),6!-!,&-,/'.!-744%&4*"-.+$$0,&'),$1 
<=>?@AB?<CDAEEFFDAG=HBDFI>=<@
J9K  J9K 
L+"%K  L+"%K 
M!'$%K  M!'$%K 
N+'%K  N+'%K 


DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED Manager
Alex Lavoie
6/6/2024
Eduardo Martinez
6/7/2024
Mayor
516
 



 

 









 !"
"

#$%&'(&)*+&+,'++,&-.+/*01.-,2*)3(,'%%)*+$'/0*1(&14.-&( +,'+&5-&&3+,&-*)+1'-+$'/2&)+%.2.+6)%&(('-*)+1'-+ '2&)32&)+,'(7&&)'$$1*4&37/+,&-.+/-*6)-.%*1+,&-.+/ 2')'8&19


:;<= 

>  
?@? > 

A 

>
@@

B >

>
B=
@
;

C;D 

@@B
 >
B?>?
> 

>
@@
>?
E
 


<
 F;G<
 F
@?>HB >>IB >AB
B JA
@>


=@
K;L =
>A>
@@

M?
@
@A

> 

?

>A


 

>

@>
>

; 



M?B=

NO?B

@?B M?>;

P; 

>
@@>?
@ =
>@@
 J
>>Q

D  Q
 A

RB
 OD

? ><


@
<E
S

JQ  RB
 Q
<TUHVWVX

 ADYVZWVOWWVX
 V;D@@ =
>

>?

 

>
@@
>?
E

BB=
@
[><E
S

J\
B
 >>
@@

?];

^;G
@@B
 =
I>K
 V^
>

B@ >=
>[>
>
>

 ;G>
@@ B
@
> >;

X;D
 
?> >>@
 >>
@@


 

B
 ? > 


>
@@

?]

?> >>@
 >?>
NB
? ? J>
 

B
 >
  ?

?];

_;D@@ >?


=
JM?
> 

>
@@
B=
 



> 

>
@@
H
?
;G >?


=
J?>

NB
? ? J> 

B
 >
  ?

?];
`abcdeefeghbaijklbamenopqjqreb
stpuvwdusxywk``z
za{{|jco}xeb~cnef
`abcdeefeghbaijklbamenopqjqreb
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 517
 



 

 








 
!
"#$"# #
"

%&'
(&)** 
(+
(+(
 (+
, 

 (-.
(
 

(
**
 
 /


*.
-( 0 1
(
*+
-(
/--
&'
((
**

((2-
 3


4 (* 

*
 (
 %&%5-6


/(- (
*

 (
 (,-.( (
-
7, ( 

&'
(
 

(
**

((-
(/

 

4
(* 


*
 (
 %&85&'
(
**
*.4
5,- -(
**.94
5

(
,( ((


* /
0 1
(

*+-(
/
--
+
((---
94
5
(%8:;;-&& (
 
,( ((


*

(-(



-

*<=-((+

(*
. /
,(.
+
((---


7 =

,( ((
  /*.&-,-((( 

+
>
,( ((
>

(

? 
,/

( 
*

/ @

*
/.  1

* 
&

%&%ABC
(/
(
((),@-( 
.D6
?

/

(


((

(**
(:



 


 +)EFG;FH;;FI

%&8J'B)BJ
(/
(
((),@-( 
.D6

?

/
(


((

(**
(:




KLMNOPQNKRSPTUUV
KLMNOPQNKRSPTUUV
UWXYQZZ[Z\]XW^_T`XWaZbcMd_deZX
ffgVYhYbVZ_cZX`idjd
Ncc_kldXXZcc]XY_mZX
ngVXW[opRcXZZcTqiWWXr
KZ^sWXmTKsnggnt
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 518
 


    




 !"#$%

% &

'(
)

 
*
' 
*
*+ ,
-
.)




,


/
 
*



-0 
1) 21) 2.3


4
0 )
 
/

2.50

/

)

 
*
'/


 
*

/
5* 

0

*
-*2.
4
.1) 2.
)

/
). 3

4
0


/
)'6


)

 
*
.
 
*

//4 0
/ 

2
5



2
2 5
-

 
*




27 -
8*)

8)

2) 4


/
'90

/


)

 
*



/
)*

52
/

 
*
.

2
/

,

// 



 

* 1
8
.
/) 

- ,/
*/
/5
 
*
7


) 

5 

2'

:'; +
' 
*
*+ ,
-
.)



,


/

 
*
/

/

.


 -

)22

2 )

2.* 11

.)*
-.-

. 2
/* 



.
* 

-
0)  
0

- 1
/,
 1+
- 
/

 
*
'

'

2< )
2'/
-/


))
*5)
.
,
-
.) 

.
**0


.

.
)*

*


.4


.-)/
*
 
/1



))
   5


)0
0


/

 
*
.,/
*/.0) =0

.

5

4



2,

/

5

1.
/5
1



-



2'())
*5. 
*

/))*/*+)


0) 
=0

'>
,

/



-
/ -
-. 
*

/
5 5
-



) 4




2) )

2

, 

,/
*/ 
*
/


4 )
 /

4 )
  
*
7
 ,0
?) 4


./ ,4.

/
 
*

/.)0
0

@*

A5 ,.

1
2.



/ 
/1



2 1
-


2

* 42 <05
*B* 

6*

=0


+
-
/

*
0 
0*/) )

2

, 

'

C'<


.
1+
. )2
-/


B
-/


9
' 
*

/

)05

/ 

21


.

* 4

.
4 )1

.* *)

.



-
.


.+ ,/ ,.
1) 41

.
4



  
-
, +

0
/ 
/
)
0

- 1*

4 

0)) 

52
/

 
*
,

/ 0


/8)

)
,

* 

 
/

2D-'(2
/
-
0

-
 1*

4 

0)) 

52
/

 
*


)

5.

1+5.
* )2
-/
5 
/,

-2)
*
5.

2
4

/8*0

4

-/


+
0*/

*
0) )
2
-/

'>
,

/



-
/
 -
-. 
*
12.
*
4 -

27 )
,

* 

.

+)

.

1+.* )2
-/
 
/

*
0) )
2
-/

 
2
/
-
0

- 1*

4 

0)) 

52
/

 
*
'E ,4.


2
4
.
 
*

4 *52-

. 8*0

4.02
)

0). 2
2.

015.))
0., 
,


*
.,

/
/

-/



.
05
*
.)*

*
8)





*


/
-/


1+./41
.* )2.1

2.1+

4

4, +
 .0
.
.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B57F58A-A8CE-439A-AF85-D6221DF637ED 519
 


    

 















 








 !"






#

 



$





!


!%
&

'! 

!

 



!(

$


!




"
 !
$

 




 
!
$



$



 

$








! 



 











# 








!


&

 














$

 















!


 

!
 

!