Richmond City Council
December 16, 2025

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH
PENKOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC. (DBA PENKOR WRECKING) FOR SELECTIVE DEMOLITION AND SITE SECURITY AT THE TERMINAL 1 WAREHOUSE AND APPROPRIATING $283,000 FROM THE PORT ENTERPRISE FUND
WHEREAS, a fire on April 30, 2025, partially damaged the interior wood framing of the warehouse located at Terminal 1; and
WHEREAS, the Port issued a public solicitation for selective demolition and site security work through the City’s Bids Online system; and
WHEREAS, five contractors submitted proposals in response to the solicitation; and WHEREAS, Penkor General Contractors Inc., doing business as Penkor Wrecking, submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid; and WHEREAS, the total cost of the construction agreement is not included in the Fiscal Year 2025–26 Port Budget and requires an appropriation from the Port Enterprise Fund.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Richmond approves a construction agreement with Penkor Wrecking in an amount not to exceed $283,000 to complete selective demolition and site security improvements at the Terminal 1 warehouse.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Richmond appropriates $283,000 from the Port Enterprise Fund (Account String: 40162480-400538) to fully fund the project.
******************
***THE CLERK’S OFFICE WILL COMPLETE THE INFORMATION BELOW**** I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held on December 16, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:
405
Reso. No. _____

City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on December 16, 2025.
_______________________________________
Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
406
City of Richmond
Port Department

CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
This Construction Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this ____ day of ____, 2025, by and between the City of Richmond, a municipal corporation and charter city (“City”) and Penkor General Contractors Inc (“Contractor”), with reference to the following facts. The parties may be referred to in this Agreement individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. On October 1, 2025, the City circulated an Invitation for Bids seeking contractors willing to undertake the construction of Terminal 1 selective demolition and site security, located at Terminal 1 (the “Project”).

B. Contractor submitted the lowest responsive bid and has been determined to be responsible.

C. City now desires to contract with Contractor to furnish construction and related services for the Project.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and agreements hereinafter set forth, and intending to be bound hereby, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE I

CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT
Section 1.1 Contract Documents.

Project Specifications – including the Notice to Prospective Bidders, Invitation for Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Special Provisions, Description of Work, Construction Details (including all plans and specifications), and Proposal Package, along with any Requests for Information (RFI), responses to RFI, and addenda issued prior to the deadline for submitting bids Plans and Specifications dated September 2025 as well as Addendum Number 1 dated October 22, 2025 – Contractor’s Proposal as attached, and this Agreement, constitute the “Contract Documents.”
Section 1.2 Construction.

Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, methods, processes, implements, tools and machinery, within the time frames set, and do all the things necessary for the proper completion of the work shown and described in Contract Documents.

Section 1.3 Payments.
407
Contractor agrees to receive and accept the sums set forth in the Bid Schedule attached as part of the Proposal, as full compensation for furnishing all materials and doing all the work contemplated and required by this Agreement, and for all loss or damage arising out of the nature of the undertaking of the construction of the Project, or from the acts of the elements, or from any unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the construction of the Project until its completion and acceptance by the City, and for all expenses incurred by or in consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of the construction of the Project, and for well and faithfully performing the construction of the Project and the whole thereof, in the manner and according to the Contract Documents.

Section 1.4 Discovery of Hazardous Waste or Unusual Conditions. (a) Promptly and before the following conditions are disturbed, the Contractor shall notify the City in writing of any:
(1) Material that the Contractor believes may be hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law.
(2) Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids.
(3) Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in this Agreement. (b) The City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if it finds that the conditions do materially so differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in the Contractor's cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work shall issue a Change Order under the procedures described in this Agreement.
(c) In the event that a dispute arises between the City and the Contractor whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in the Contractor's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, the Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date provided for by this Agreement, but shall proceed with all work to be performed under this Agreement. The Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the Parties.

Section 1.5 Laws and Regulations.
(a) The Project work shall proceed only after procurement of each permit, license, or other authorization that may be required by any governmental agency having jurisdiction, and Contractor shall be responsible to the City for the procurement and maintenance thereof.
408
(b) Contractor shall cause all work performed in connection with construction of the Project to be performed in compliance with (i) all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations now in force or that may be enacted hereafter; (ii) all conditions of Project approval and mitigation measures included in any adopted or certified environmental document prepared for the Project; and (iii) all directions, rules and regulations of any fire marshal, health officer, building inspector, or other officer of every governmental agency now having or hereafter acquiring jurisdiction, provided that such direction given during construction does not conflict with conditions of Project approval or mitigation measures.
(c) Contractor shall and shall cause its subcontractors to pay prevailing wages in the construction of the Project as those wages are determined pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq., and implementing regulations of the Department of Industrial Relations, and to comply with all other applicable federal, State and local laws, regulations and ordinances pertaining to labor standards insofar as those laws, regulations and ordinances apply to the performance of this Agreement, including any applicable City of Richmond employment requirements, including but not limited to the City's Living Wage Ordinance (Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 2.60), the City's Business Opportunity Ordinance (Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 2.50), and the City's Local Employment Program Ordinance (Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 2.56). During the construction of the Project, Contractor shall post at the construction site the applicable prevailing rates of per diem wages. Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend, (with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City) the City against any claims for damages, compensation, fines, penalties or other amounts arising out of failure or alleged failure of any person or entity (including Contractor and its subcontractors) to pay prevailing wages in connection with construction of the Project. This Section 1.5(c) shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
(d) Contractor and all subcontractors shall maintain accurate payroll records showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker and others employed on the Project. Each payroll record shall contain or be verified by a written declaration made under penalty of perjury, stating both of the following: (1) the information contained in the payroll record is true and correct, and (2) the employer has complied with the requirements of Labor Code Section 1771 (prevailing wage provisions), Section 1811 (eight-hour day, forty-hour week provisions), and Section 1815 (overtime compensation) for any work performed by his or her employees on the Project. The Contractor shall provide certified payroll records to the City each week, no later than ten (10) days after the end of a weekly pay period. Pay records shall be maintained and made available in accordance with Labor Code Section 1776. In addition, Contractor shall and shall cause its subcontractors promptly to deliver to the City, upon request, documents verifying compliance with the Living Wage Ordinance, which include documents which evidence that each affected employee has been notified regarding the wages required to be paid pursuant to the Living Wage Ordinance. Such wages shall also be posted at the construction site. This Section 1.5(d) shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
409
Section 1.6 Inspections.

Contractor shall permit and facilitate, and shall require its subcontractors to permit and facilitate, observation and inspection of the Project by the City and by public authorities at all times for the purposes of determining compliance with this Agreement and permits issued to perform the Project work. In so doing, Contractor shall provide access for testing and inspections. Contractor shall coordinate and schedule all testing and inspections required on the Project with the required advance notice as defined in the Project Specifications.

Section 1.7 Equal Opportunity.
(a) During the construction of the Project there shall be no discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or disability in the hiring, firing, promoting, or demoting of any person engaged in the construction work.
(b) In addition, Contractor agrees to observe the provisions of Section 2.28.030 of the Richmond Municipal Code, obligating Contractor and its subcontractors to refrain from discriminatory employment or subcontracting practices on the basis of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religion, creed, national origin or ancestry of any employee, any applicant for employment or any potential subcontractor.

Section 1.8 Working Hours.

Eight hours of labor is a legal day’s work. Any worker’s time of service is restricted to eight hours during any calendar day, and 40 hours during a calendar week, unless overtime compensation is paid at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay. The Contractor shall be assessed a penalty of twenty-five dollars ($25) for each day a worker is employed in violation of these requirements. Work on site will be allowed between 8am and 5pm during work days. Weekend work will only be allowed with prior approval from the City between 9am and 4pm.

Section 1.9 Insurance and Bond Requirements.
(a) In accordance with California Labor Code Section 3700, Contractor must secure Workers’ Compensation coverage for its employees. Prior to performing any work, Contractor must execute a certification in the form set out at California Labor Code Section 1861.
(b) Contractor shall submit to the City evidence of the insurance and payment and performance bond coverage meeting the requirements set forth in the Project Specifications. Proof of insurance and bonding related to the construction of the Project shall be provided to the City not more than (10) days after award of the contract. The City shall review and approve or disapprove of the evidence of insurance within twenty (20) days after submittal of complete information in the form required by the City. If the 410
City disapproves the evidence of insurance, it shall specify in writing the reasons for such disapproval. Contractor shall resubmit the information required within ten (10) days.

The review and submittal periods for resubmittals shall be reduced to a ten (10) day review period for the City and a five (5) day period for resubmittal by Contractor and shall continue to apply until the City approves the evidence of insurance coverage, but in no event shall the submittal and review period continue for more than forty-five (45) days. If, after forty-five (45) days the Contractor has not provided evidence of insurance and bond coverage meeting the requirements of the City, the City shall terminate the contract and may either award the work to the next lowest responsive responsible bidder or issue a new request for bids. (If the City issues a new request for bids, the Contractor shall be disqualified from re-bidding the work because of the failure to provide timely proof of insurance and/or bond coverage.) No work shall be initiated on the Project prior to Contractor's receipt of the City's approval of evidence of insurance coverage related to the construction of the Project.
(c) Contractor shall have furnished the City with evidence of the insurance coverage meeting the insurance requirements set forth in Project Specifications for each subcontractor prior to initiating any work on the Project, including Builder's Risk insurance with appropriate coverage for the cost of construction. The periods for submittal, review and approval shall apply as stated in subparagraph (b) above. (d) The Parties agree that notwithstanding the time requirements set forth in this subsection for submittal and resubmittal to the City by the Contractor of the evidence of insurance and review and approval of the evidence of insurance by the City, Contractor is responsible for ensuring that the evidence of insurance in approvable form is submitted to the City in a timely manner.

Section 1.10 Security In Lieu of Retention.
(a) The City shall retain five percent (5%) of the sum requested in each progress payment unless the Contractor elects to invoke the procedures set forth at California Public Contract Code 22300 to substitute securities to ensure performance under the contract.

1. At the request and the expense of the Contractor, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the City, or with a state or federally chartered bank in the state as escrow agent, who shall then pay the retained funds to the Contractor.

Upon satisfactory completion of the contract, the securities shall be returned to the Contractor.

2. Alternatively, the Contractor may request and the City shall make payment of retentions earned directly to the escrow agent at the expense of the Contractor. At the expense of the Contractor, the Contractor may direct the investment of the payments into securities and the Contractor shall receive the interest earned on the investments upon the same terms provided for in Public Contract Code 22300 for securities deposited by the Contractor. Upon satisfactory completion of this Agreement, the Contractor shall receive from the escrow agent all securities, interest, and payments received by the escrow agent from the owner, pursuant to the terms of this section.
411
(b) If the Contractor chooses to place securities in escrow, the escrow agreement to be used shall be substantially similar to the following form:

ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR SECURITY DEPOSITS IN LIEU OF RETENTION This Escrow Agreement is made and entered into by and between _________________________________________________ whose address is ________________________________ hereinafter called "Owner," ___________ whose address is ________________________________ hereinafter called "Contractor" and ___________ whose address is ________________________________ hereinafter called "Escrow Agent."
For the consideration hereinafter set forth, the Owner, Contractor, and Escrow Agent agree as follows:
(1) Pursuant to Section 22300 of the Public Contract Code of the State of California, Contractor has the option to deposit securities with Escrow Agent as a substitute for retention earnings required to be withheld by Owner pursuant to the Construction Contract entered into between the Owner and Contractor for ____ in the amount of ____ dated ____ (hereinafter referred to as the "Contract"). Alternatively, on written request of the Contractor, the Owner shall make payments of the retention earnings directly to the Escrow Agent. When the Contractor deposits the securities as a substitute for Contract earnings, the Escrow Agent shall notify the Owner within 10 days of the deposit. The market value of the securities at the time of the substitution shall be at least equal to the cash amount then required to be withheld as retention under the terms of the Contract between the Owner and Contractor. Securities shall be held in the name of ____, and shall designate the Contractor as the beneficial owner. (2) The Owner shall make progress payments to the Contractor for those funds which otherwise would be withheld from progress payments pursuant to the Contract provisions, provided that the Escrow Agent holds securities in the form and amount specified above. (3) When the Owner makes payment of retentions earned directly to the Escrow Agent, the Escrow Agent shall hold them for the benefit of the Contractor until the time that the escrow created under this contract is terminated. The Contractor may direct the investment of the payments into securities. All terms and conditions of this agreement and the rights and responsibilities of the parties shall be equally applicable and binding when the Owner pays the Escrow Agent directly.
(4) Contractor shall be responsible for paying all fees for the expenses incurred by Escrow Agent in administering the Escrow Account and all expenses of the Owner. These expenses and payment terms shall be determined by the Owner, Contractor, and Escrow Agent. (5) The interest earned on the securities or the money market accounts held in escrow and all interest earned on that interest shall be for the sole account of Contractor and shall be subject to withdrawal by Contractor at any time and from time to time without notice to the Owner .
412
(6) Contractor shall have the right to withdraw all or any part of the principal in the Escrow Account only by written notice to Escrow Agent accompanied by written authorization from the Owner to the Escrow Agent that Owner consents to the withdrawal of the amount sought to be withdrawn by Contractor.
(7) The Owner shall have a right to draw upon the securities in the event of default by the Contractor. Upon seven days' written notice to the Escrow Agent from the Owner of the default, the Escrow Agent shall immediately convert the securities to cash and shall distribute the cash as instructed by the Owner.
(8) Upon receipt of written notification from the Owner certifying that the Contract is final and complete, and that the Contractor has complied with all requirements and procedures applicable to the Contract, Escrow Agent shall release to Contractor all securities and interest on deposit less escrow fees and charges of the Escrow Account. The escrow shall be closed immediately upon disbursement of all moneys and securities on deposit and payments of fees and charges. (9) Escrow Agent shall rely on the written notifications from the Owner and the Contractor pursuant to Sections (5) to (8), inclusive, of this Agreement and the Owner and Contractor shall hold Escrow Agent harmless from Escrow Agent's release and disbursement of the securities and interest as set forth above.
(10) The names of the persons who are authorized to give written notice or to receive written notice on behalf of the Owner and on behalf of Contractor in connection with the foregoing, and exemplars of their respective signatures are as follows:

On behalf of Owner: On behalf of Contractor:
_______________________ _________________________
Title Title
_______________________ _________________________
Name Name
_____________________ _________________________
Signature Signature
_______________________ _________________________
Address Address
On behalf of Escrow Agent:
_______________________
Title
_______________________
Name
_______________________
Signature
_______________________
Address
At the time the Escrow Account is opened, the Owner and Contractor shall deliver to the Escrow Agent a fully executed counterpart of this Agreement. 413
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement by their proper officers on the date first set forth above.

Owner Contractor
________________________ _________________________
Title Title
________________________ _________________________
Name Name
________________________ _________________________
Signature Signature
Section 1.11 Senate Bill 854 Notice Requirements.

As provided in SB 854: a) no contactor or subcontractor may be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, unless currently registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 [Gov't Code Section 1771.1(a)]; b) no contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a public works contract unless registered with the DIR to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 [Gov't Code Section 1771.1(b)]; and c) work performed on the project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR [Gov't Code Section 1771.4].

Section 1.12 Job Site Notices.

Contractor shall post at the job site notices in compliance with Title I California Code of Regulations Section 16451.

ARTICLE II

DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
Section 2.1 Events of Default.

In addition the remedies set forth in Section 2.2, below, in the event of default the Department Head reserves the right to stop work immediately if any action or inaction by the Contractor or any subcontractor creates a risk of imminent harm to the public or property.

Each of the following shall constitute a "Default" by Contractor under this Agreement:
(a) Breach of Covenants. Failure by Contractor or any subcontractor to duly perform, comply with, or observe any of the conditions, terms, or covenants of any of the Contract Documents. The City shall give Contractor written notice of the breach and specify a time in which to cure the breach. If the Contractor cures the breach within the time specified in the notice or, if the breach cannot be cured in the time specified but the Contractor has diligently pursued measures to cure the breach and to keep the City informed of its progress, then the breach shall not constitute a default provided that the 414
breach is cured within thirty (30) days from the date of the City’s last notice and demand to cure.
(b) Disregard of Laws. Disregard of laws, rules, regulations, directions or instructions of City by Contractor or any subcontractor with respect to the performance of work.
(c) Insolvency. A court having jurisdiction shall have made or entered any decree or order (i) adjudging Contractor to be bankrupt or insolvent, (ii) approving as properly filed a petition seeking reorganization of Contractor or seeking any arrangement for Contractor under the bankruptcy law or any other applicable debtor's relief law or statute of the United States or any state or other jurisdiction, (iii) appointing a receiver, trustee, liquidator, or assignee of Contractor in bankruptcy or insolvency or for any of their properties, (iv) directing the winding up or liquidation of Contractor if any such decree or order described in clauses (i) to (iv), inclusive, shall have continued unstayed or undischarged for a period of ninety (90) days; or (v) Contractor shall have admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts as they fall due or shall have voluntarily submitted to or filed a petition seeking any decree or order of the nature described in clauses (i) to (iv), inclusive.
(d) Suspension; Termination. Contractor shall have voluntarily suspended its business, or shall have voluntarily or involuntarily lost or terminated one or more of the licenses required to perform the work.
(e) Liens on Property and the Development. There shall be filed any claim of lien (other than liens approved in writing by the City) against the Project or the construction site or any part thereof, or any interest or right made appurtenant thereto and the continued maintenance of said claim of lien for a period of twenty (20) days without discharge or satisfaction thereof or provision therefore (including, without limitation, the posting of bonds) satisfactory to the City.

Section 2.2 Remedies.

The occurrence of any Default hereunder following the expiration of all applicable notice and cure periods will, either at the option of the City or automatically where so specified, relieve the City of any obligation to make or continue payments and shall give the City the right to proceed with any and all remedies set forth in the Contract Documents, including but not limited to the following:
(a) Specific Performance. The City shall have the right to mandamus or other suit, action or proceeding at law or in equity to require Contractor to perform its obligations and covenants under this Agreement or to enjoin acts on things which may be unlawful or in violation of the provisions of this Agreement.
(b) Right of Contest. Contractor shall have the right to contest in good faith any claim, demand, levy, or assessment the assertion of which would constitute a Default 415
hereunder. Any such contest shall be prosecuted diligently and in a manner unprejudicial to the City or the rights of the City hereunder.
(c) Remedies Cumulative. No right, power, or remedy given to the City by the terms of the Contract Documents is intended to be exclusive of any other right, power, or remedy; and each and every such right, power, or remedy shall be cumulative and in addition to every other right, power, or remedy given to the City by the terms of any such instrument, or by any statute or otherwise against Contractor and any other person.

Neither the failure nor any delay on the part of the City to exercise any such rights and remedies shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise by the City of any such right or remedy preclude any other or further exercise of such right or remedy, or any other right or remedy.

Section 2.3 Waiver of Damages.

Contractor, in having tendered the Proposal, shall be deemed to have waived any and all claims for damages because of termination of this Agreement for any reason. Contractor shall not be entitled to any lost profit in the event of termination.

ARTICLE III

GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 3.1 Relationship of Parties.

Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be interpreted or understood by any of the Parties, or by any third persons, as creating the relationship of employer and employee, principal and agent, limited or general partnership, or joint venture between the City and Contractor or its agents, employees or subcontractors, and Contractor shall at all times be deemed an independent contractor and shall be wholly responsible for the manner in which it or its agents, or both, perform the services required of it by the terms of this Agreement. Contractor has and retains the right to exercise full control of employment, direction, compensation, and discharge of all persons assisting in the performance of services under the Agreement. In regards to the construction of the Project, Contractor shall be solely responsible for all matters relating to payment of its employees, including compliance with Social Security, withholding, and all other laws and regulations governing such matters, and shall include requirements in each contract that subcontractors shall be solely responsible for similar matters relating to their employees.

Contractor shall be solely responsible for its own acts and those of its agents and employees.

Section 3.2 Change Orders.
(a) Changes affecting the time of performance, unit pricing, or total contract price shall be set forth in a written Change Order that shall specify:

1. The work performed in connection with the change to be made;

2. The amount of the adjustment to the Payment Limit, if any, and the basis for compensation for the work ordered; which adjustment may be a negotiated lump sum amount, agreed unit price, or paid under “Force Account”. Cumulative 416
Contractor & Subcontractor mark up for labor and material shall not exceed a total of 15% (15% GC mark upon labor and material for self-performed work and 5% mark up on subcontractor work and 10% subcontractor mark up for labor and material) and;

3. The amount of time to be adjusted in the schedule for performance, if any. (b) A Change Order will become effective when signed by the Department Head, or his or her representative, notwithstanding that Contractor has not signed it. A Change Order will become effective without Contractor’s signature, provided the Department Head or his or her representative so indicates by noting thereon “unilateral change order.” (c) All changes in any plans and specification approved by any authority with jurisdiction over the Project may also require addenda or change orders approved by that authority.
(d) Where the City requests, a performance bond rider covering the changed work must be executed and delivered to the City before proceeding with the changed work, or shortly in time thereafter.
(e) The Department Head or his or her representative has the authority to approve Change Orders with a cumulative dollar value of up to ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

Section 3.3 Claims By Contractor.
(a) No Third-Party Claims. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create or justify any claim against the City by any person that Contractor may have employed or with whom Contractor may have contracted relative to the purchase of materials, supplies or equipment, or the furnishing or the performance of any work or services with respect to the construction of the Project, and Contractor shall include similar requirements in any contracts entered into for the construction of the Project.
(b) Obligation to File Claims for Disputed Work. Should it appear to the Contractor that the work to be performed or any of the matters relative to the Contract Documents are not satisfactorily detailed or explained therein, or should any questions arise as to the meaning or intent of the Contract Documents, or should any dispute arise regarding the true value of any work performed, work omitted, extra work that the Contractor may be required to perform, time extensions, payment to the Contractor during performance of the work, construction of the Project, and/or compliance with procedures or standards set forth in the Contract Documents, or should Contractor otherwise seek extra time or compensation FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER, then Contractor shall first follow the procedures set forth in this Agreement, including but not limited to Section 3.2, “Change Orders.” If a dispute remains, then Contractor shall give written notice to the City that expressly invokes this Section 3.3 and requests a determination of the issue. City shall decide the issue in writing within 15 days; City’s decision shall be final and the limitations period for the filing of a claim shall commence upon the City’s issuance of its decision. If Contractor disagrees with City’s decision, or if Contractor contends that City failed to provide a timely decision, then Contractor’s SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY is to file a written claim setting forth Contractor’s position as required herein. 417
(c) Form and Contents of Claim. The Claim shall be submitted to the City within thirty (30) days of receiving the City’s written decision regarding the dispute, or the date the Contractor contends such decision was due, and in no event later than the date of final payment.

Contractor’s written claim must identify itself as a “Claim” under this Section 3.3 and must include the following: (1) a narrative of pertinent events; (2) citation to contract provisions; (3) theory of entitlement; (4) complete pricing of all cost impacts; (5) a time impact analysis of all time delays that shows actual time impact on the critical path; (6) documentation supporting items 1 – 5; and (7) verification under penalty of perjury of the claim’s accuracy. The Claim shall be priced like a Change Order, and must be updated every thirty (30) days as to cost and entitlement if it remains a continuing Claim. Routine contract materials, for example, correspondence, RFI, Change Order requests, or payment requests shall not constitute a Claim.

Contractor shall bear all costs incurred in preparation, submittal, and administration of a Claim. (d) Administration After Claim Submittal.

1. City may render a final decision based solely on the materials submitted in support of the Claim or may in its sole discretion conduct an administrative hearing on the Claim, in which case Contractor shall appear, participate, answer inquiries, and present any further evidence or analysis requested by City. Should City take no action on the Claim within forty-five (45) days (if the Claim is for less than $50,000) or within sixty (60) days (if the Claim is for $50,000 or more) of submittal, it shall be deemed denied.

2. Notwithstanding and pending the resolution of any Claim or dispute, Contractor shall diligently perform the disputed work to final completion in accordance with the City’s direction.

3. After their submittal, claims less than $375,000 shall also be subject to Section 20104 of the Local Agency Public Construction Act.
(e) Compliance

1. The provisions of this Section 3.3 constitute a non-judicial claim settlement procedure that, pursuant to California Government Code Section 930.2, shall constitute a condition precedent to the submittal of a valid claim under the California Government Code. Any Government Code claims alleging disputed work must affirmatively indicate prior compliance with this Section 3.3. In accordance with Richmond Municipal Code Section 1.10.010(b), all Government Code claims must be presented no later than the 100th day after the earlier of (i) the date the City actively or passively denied the Claim, or (ii) substantial completion or termination of the contract.

2. Failure to submit and administer Claims as required in Section 3.3 shall waive Contractor’s right to compensation for any disputed work not included in a timely Claim. Disputes not raised in a timely protest and timely Claim submitted under this Section 3.3 may not be asserted in any subsequent Government Code claim, administrative hearing, or civil action.

3. City shall not be deemed to waive any provision under this Section 3.3 if, at City’s sole discretion, a Claim is administered in a manner not in accord with this Section 3.3. Waivers or modifications of this Section 3.3 may only be made by 418
signed Change Order approved as to form by legal counsel for both City and Contractor. Oral or implied modifications shall be of no force or effect.

Section 3.4 Indemnification.
(a) To the fullest extent permissible by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless, and require its subcontractors to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City, its elected and appointed officials, and all of its employees, volunteers and agents (the "Indemnified Parties"), from all liability, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims or judgments, including attorney's fees and other defense costs (collectively, "Claims"), resulting from injury to or death sustained by any person (including Contractor’s or any subcontractors' employees), or damage to property of any kind, or any other injury or damage whatsoever, which Claims arise out of or are in any way connected with the construction of the Project, regardless of Contractor's fault or negligence; provided, however, that Contractor's, and Contractor's subcontractors' indemnity obligations hereunder shall not apply to the extent any Claims are caused by the active negligence or willful act or omission of an Indemnified Party. The indemnification obligations of Contractor and its subcontractors shall extend to Claims asserted after termination of this Agreement for whatever reason. (b) In Claims against any person or entity indemnified under Section 3.4(a) above by an employee of Contractor or its subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any one of them or anyone for whose acts one of them may be liable, the indemnification obligation under Section 3.4(a) above shall not be limited by a limitation on amount or type of damages, compensation of benefits payable under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts or other employee benefit acts.

Section 3.5 Non-Liability of City Officials, Employees and Agents.

No member, official, employee or agent of the City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to Contractor or its successor or on any obligation under the terms of this Agreement.

Section 3.6 No Third Party Beneficiaries.

There shall be no third party beneficiaries to this Agreement.

Section 3.7 Conflict of Interest.
(a) Except for approved eligible administrative or personnel costs, no person described in Section 3.7(b) below who exercises or has exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to the activities funded pursuant to this Agreement or who is in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from the activity, or have an interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect 419
thereto, or the proceeds thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business ties, during, or at any time after, such person's tenure. Contractor shall exercise due diligence to ensure that the prohibition in this Section 3.7(a) is followed. (b) The conflict of interest provisions of Section 3.7(a) above apply to any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected or appointed official of the City of Richmond, and any immediate family member or dependent of such person.

Section 3.8 Notices, Demands and Communications.

If at any time after the execution of this Agreement it shall become necessary or convenient for one of the Parties hereto to serve any notice, demand or communication upon the other Party, such notice, demand or communication shall be in writing and shall be served personally or by depositing the same in the registered United States mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid or delivered by express delivery service, return receipt requested and (1) if intended for the City shall be addressed to:

City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, California 94804
Attention: Charles Gerard
With copy to:

City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Attention: City Attorney
(2) if intended for Contractor shall be addressed to:

Penkor General Contractors
1791 Via Hermana
San Lorenzo, CA 94580
Attn: Khaleel Obaidi
Any notice, demand or communication shall be deemed given, received, made or communicated on the date personal delivery is affected or, if mailed in the manner herein specified, on the delivery date or date delivery is refused by the addressee, as shown on the return receipt. Any Party may change its address at any time by giving written notice of such change at least ten (10) days prior to the date such change is desired to be effective.

Section 3.9 Applicable Law.
420
This Agreement shall be governed by California law. This Agreement is made in Contra Costa County, California, and any action relating to this Agreement shall be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County, California.

Section 3.10 Parties Bound.

Except as otherwise limited herein, the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors, and assigns. Any reference in this Agreement to a specifically named Party shall be deemed to apply to any successor, heir, administrator, executor, successor, or assign of such Party who has acquired an interest in compliance with the terms of this Agreement or under law.

This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, administrators, executors, successors in interest, and assigns of each of the Parties.

Section 3.11 Severability.

If any term of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall continue in full force and effect unless the rights and obligations of the Parties have been materially altered or abridged by such invalidation, voiding or unenforceability.

Section 3.12 Force Majeure.

Performance by either Party shall not be deemed to be in default when delays in performance are due to war, insurrection, strikes, lock-outs, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, or court order, or any other similar causes (other than lack of funds of Contractor) beyond the control or without the fault of the Party claiming an extension of time to perform (“Force-Majeure Delays”). In no event shall any extension of any period of time be deemed to have occurred unless the Party claiming the Force-Majeure Delay gives written notice to the other Party within ten (10) days following the commencement of any such delay, setting forth the facts giving rise to the Force-Majeure Delay request, the expected duration of the delay, and the steps the Party intends to take to minimize the Delay. During the Force-Majeure Delay, the Party whose performance is delayed shall keep the other Party reasonably informed of the situation and the steps taken by such Party to continue performance and minimize delay. After the Force-Majeure Delay is over, the Parties shall in good faith jointly prepare an accurate written record of the circumstances giving rise to delay, specifying the commencement date and duration of the Force-Majeure Delay and the cause thereof, which record shall be signed by each Party to confirm agreement with respect to its content. In no event shall the City be required to agree to cumulative Force-Majeure Delays in excess of sixty (60) days unless the City is the cause of such delay. In the event that the parties cannot agree upon a record of the circumstances giving rise to the Force-Majeure Delay, the procedures set forth in Section 3.3 of this Agreement shall apply.

Section 3.13 Waivers.
421
Any waiver by the City of any obligation or condition in this Agreement must be in writing. No waiver will be implied from any delay or failure by the City to take action on any breach or default of Contractor or to pursue any remedy allowed under this Agreement or applicable law. Any extension of time granted to Contractor to perform any obligation under this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver or release from any of its obligations under this Agreement. Consent by the City to any act or omission by Contractor shall not be construed to be consent to any other or subsequent act or omission or to waive the requirement for the City's written consent to future waivers.

Section 3.14 Title of Parts and Sections.

Any titles of the sections or subsections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in interpreting any part of the Agreement's provisions.

Section 3.15 Entire Understanding of the Parties.

The Contract Documents – along with any written change orders and dispute determinations that may be issued by the City in the course of performance – shall constitute the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties with respect to construction of the Project.

The Contract Documents, written change orders (if any), and dispute determinations (if any) are deemed complementary and should be interpreted together.

Section 3.16 Multiple Originals; Counterpart.

This Agreement may be executed in multiple originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, and may be signed in counterparts. A facsimile or electronic signature to this Agreement shall be as valid as an ink signed original.

WHEREAS, this Agreement has been entered into by the undersigned as of the date first above written.

Reviewed By:
_______________________
City Attorney
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
CITY:

CITY OF RICHMOND, a municipal corporation and
charter city
By: _________________________________
Name: _________________________________
Its: __________________________________
422
CONTRACTOR:

Penkor General Contractors Inc
By: _________________________________
Name: Khaleel Obaidi
Its: _________________________________
423

BID SCHEDULE
424
425
City of Richmond Terminal 1 Selective Demolition And Site Security Bid Proposal
18 City of Richmond
Port Department

BID PROPOSAL
DATE: _____________________________
TO THE CITY CLERK OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA:

NAME OF BIDDER _________________________________________________________________ BUSINESS P.O. BOX ________________________________________________________________ BUSINESS STREET ADDRESS _______________________________________________________ (Please include even if P.O. Box used)
CITY, STATE, ZIP __________________________________________________________________ TELEPHONE NO. AREA CODE ( )______________________________________________ FAX NO. AREA CODE ( ) _____________________________________________ CONTRACTOR LICENSE NO. _______________________________________________________ LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE _______________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS NO. ____________________________________ Terminal 1 Selective Demolition And Site Security
The work to be done and referred to herein is in the City of Richmond, Contra Costa County, State of California.

Construction to be in accordance with the Special Provisions including the payment of not less than the minimum wage rates set forth herein and the Contract annexed hereto and also in accordance with the State Standard Specifications dated 2022, and the current "Equipment Rental Rates and the Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to prevailing wage rates as described in the Instructions to Bidders.

To the City of Richmond Department of Public Services:

The undersigned, as Bidder, declares that the only persons or parties interested in this Proposal as principals are those named herein; that this Proposal is made without collusion with any other person, firm or corporation; that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work; and the Plans therein referred to; and they propose, and agree if this Proposal is accepted, that they will contract with the City of Richmond to provide all necessary machinery, tools, apparatus and other means of construction, and to do all the work and furnish all the materials specified in the Contract, in the manner and time therein prescribed and according to the requirements of the Engineer as therein set forth, and that they will take in full payment therefor the following item prices to wit:

END OF BID PROPOSAL
10/30/2025
Penkor General Contractors Inc dba Penkor Wrecking
1791 Via Hermana
----
San Lorenzo CA 94580
341 208 - 8911
1094975
1000964194
8/31/2026
----- -----------
426
City of Richmond Terminal 1 Selective Demolition And Site Security Bid Schedule
19 City of Richmond
Port Department

BID SCHEDULE

BASE BID

ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST
($/UNIT)
COST
($)
101 Mobilization 1 LS
102 Water Pollution Control 1 LS
103 Hazardous Materials Testing 1 LS
104 Interior Demolition 1 LS
105 Block Door with Fence 8 EA
106 Block Door with Fence and
Door 1 EA
107 Block Door with Wood
Wall 1 EA
108 Remove Window and Block
with Wood 1 EA
109 Block Window with Wood 1 EA
110 Block Door with Wire Mesh 2 EA
111 Block Hole with Wire Mesh 1 EA
112 Block Hole with Wood 1 EA
113 Cover hole in dock with
Steel Plate 1 EA
114 Supplemental Work 1 ALLOW $30,000 $30,000
ALLOW = Allowance, LS = Lump Sum, EA = Each.
28,000 28,000
3,000 3,000
7,000 7,000
107,000 107,000
8,000 64,000
10,000 10,000
5,000 5,000
8,000 8,000
4,000 4,000
4,000 8,000
1,000 1,000
1,000 1,000
4,000 4,000
427
City of Richmond Terminal 1 Selective Demolition And Site Security Bid Schedule
20 BID SUMMARY
$

TOTAL PRICE
IN FIGURES $

TOTAL PRICE IN
WORDS
ADDITIVE ALTERNATIVE ITEM NO 1

ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST
($/UNIT)
COST
($)
A-1 Interior Demolition –
Hazardous Materials 1 LS
ADDITIVE ALTERANTIVE ITEM NO. 1 SUMMARY
$

TOTAL PRICE
IN FIGURES $

TOTAL PRICE IN
WORDS

280,000
Two hundred eighty thousand Dollars
3,000 3,000
3,000
Three Thousand Dollars
428
City of Richmond Terminal 1 Selective Demolition And Site Security Bid Schedule
21 The undersigned acknowledges the receipt of the following addenda to the drawings and specifications.

Addendum No. Date Addendum No. Date
The undersigned hereby certifies that they understand and agree that the items listed as Bid Alternates may be incorporated into the Contract Documents at the discretion of the City depending on the financial resources available at the time the contract is awarded. The undersigned herby certifies they understand and agree that regardless of whether the City incorporates the use of the Bid Alternates, the Low Bidder will be determined by the Total Bid (as shown above); which is the total of the Base Bid.

The undersigned hereby certifies that he has an appropriate license, issued by the State of California to provide this work; that such license will be in full force and in effect throughout the duration of construction; and that any and all subcontractors to be employed on this project will be similarly licensed.

Dated
California Contractor’s License No.

CONTRACTOR
Signature Print or Type Name and Title

REJECTION OF BIDS:

The undersigned agrees that the City of Richmond reserves the right to reject any or all bids, and reserves the right to waive informalities in a bid or bids not affected by law, if to do so seems to best serve the public interest.

TIME
The undersigned agrees to furnish, within ten (10) working days from the receipt of the Notice of Award of Contract, the items required by Section 1-03 of the Special Provisions. The failure to timely provide such items may result in annulment of the award and forfeiture of the Proposal Guarantee.

The undersigned agrees to begin work within ten (10) working days after the date specified in the Notice to Proceed.
1 October 22, 2025
10/30/2025 1094975
Khaleel Obaidi, Secretary
429
City of Richmond Terminal 1 Selective Demolition And Site Security Bid Schedule
22 If the proposal is accepted, the undersigned agrees to execute the required agreement and furnish the required bonds within ten (10) working days from the date of signing of this Contract.

BID DEPOSIT
There is enclosed herewith, a certified check or surety bond in the sum of ten percent (10%) of the base bid DOLLARS AND
CENTS ($ ) made payable to the City of Richmond and
the undersigned agrees that in case of his failure to execute the necessary contract and furnish the required bonds, the certified check or surety bond the money payable thereon, shall be and remain the property of the City.

The unit price or lump sum prices to be paid for the items listed in the Proposal Bid Sheet shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, and equipment, and doing all work involved in furnishing and installing the materials complete and in place, in accordance with the details as shown on the plans and as specified herein. Any items shown on the plans, but not included in the bid items, shall be considered as appurtenant items. All costs shall be included within the appropriate item of the Contractor’s bid.

BOND: TEN PERCENT (10%) OF BID AMOUNT
430
431
City of Richmond Terminal 1 Selective Demolition And Site Security Subcontractor Form
24 City of Richmond
Port Department

SUBCONTRACTOR FORM
(Required Listing of Proposed Subcontractors)
The Contractor certifies he/she has used the sub-bids of the following listed Contractors in making up his/her bid and that the sub-contractors listed will be used for the work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, and in accordance with applicable provisions of the specifications and Section 4100 et seq. of the Public Works Code – “Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act.” No changes may be made in these subcontractors except upon the prior approval of the City Engineer of the City of Richmond pursuant to Section 4107 of the Public Contracts Code. The following information is required for each subcontractor. Additional pages can be attached if required.

City will not accept a Bid Proposal from or enter into the Contract with a bidder, without proof that the bidder and its Subcontractors are registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) to perform public work under Labor Code Section 1725.5, subject to limited legal exceptions.

Items
of
Work
Full Company
Name
Richmond
Firm?
Complete Address
with Zip Code
Phone No.
with Area Code
SUBCONTRACTOR’S LIST (Continued)
The bidder is to provide the following information on the sub bids of all the listed subcontractors as part of the sealed bid submission. Additional pages can be attached, if required.

Alternate 1
Haz Mat Demo
SWPPP
Haz Mat
Testing 1)
2)
3)
Van Brunt
Associates, Inc.

Tully Consulting
Group
N 1401 N. Broadway, Suite 225
Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (925) 685-5900
1650 N Lincoln St, Ste A
Dixon, CA 95620 N (707) 693-1926
N
6925 San Leandro St
Oakland, CA 94621 (510) 562-6181 Bayview Environmental
Services
432
Subcontractor Form
25 Type of State
Contracting License &
Number
DIR Registration
Number
Amount of Bid
($ or %)
*Licenses are renewable annually. If no valid license, indicate “NONE.” Valid license must be obtained prior to submission of signed contracts. This applies to all subcontractors.

NOTE: If alternate bids are called for, and Contractor intends to use different or additional subcontractors on the alternates, he/she must provide a separate list of subcontractors for each alternate.
_______________________________________
Signature of Bidder

END OF SUBCONTRACTOR FORM
1)
2)
3)
CAC #92-0354
CDPH IA #6683 NA for consulting 2.4%
1000024960 Civil Engineering 541330
Civil Engineer License C64354 1.1%
CSLB# 684341 (C22) 1000002423 up to 15.8%
433
Debarment and Suspension Certification
26 BIDDER’S STATEMENT OF PAST CONTRACT DISQUALIFICATIONS The Bidder is required to state any and all instances of being disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on or completing any contract for construction.

1. Have you ever been disqualified from any contract?
Yes No

2. If yes, explain the circumstances:
_
Signature of Bidder
X
434
Debarment and Suspension Certification
27 City of Richmond
Port Department

PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE
Public Contract Code Section 10285.1 Statement
In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 10285.1 (Chapter 376, Stats. 1985), the Bidder hereby declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the bidder has_____ has not_____been convicted within the preceding three years of any offenses referred to in that section, including any charge of fraud, bribery, collusion, conspiracy, or any other act in violation of any state or Federal antitrust law in connection with the bidding upon, award of, or performance of any public works contract as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1101, with any public entity, as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1100, including the Regents of the University of California or the Trustees of the California State University. The term “bidder” is understood to include any partner, member, officer, director, responsible managing officer, or responsible managing employee thereof, as referred to in Section 10285.1.

Note: The bidder must place a check mark after “has” or “has not” in one of the blank space provided. The above Statement is part of the Bid Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Statement. Bidders are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.

Public Contract Code Section 10162 Questionnaire
In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 10162, the Bidder shall complete under penalty of perjury, the following questionnaire:

Has the bidder, any officer of the bidder, or any employee of the bidder who has a proprietary interest in the bidder, ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation? Yes_____ No_____
If the answer is yes, explain the circumstances in the following space.

X
X
435
Debarment and Suspension Certification
28 Public Contract Code Section 10232 Statement
In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 10232, the Contractor hereby states under penalty of perjury, that no more than one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against the Contractor within the immediately preceding two year period because of the Contractor’s failure to comply with an order of a federal court which orders the contractor to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Note: The above Statement and Questionnaire are part of the Bid Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Statement. Bidders are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CERTIFICATION
I am aware of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.

By:

Title:

Date:

END OF PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE
Khaleel Obaidi
Secretary
10/30/2025
436
Debarment and Suspension Certification
29 City of Richmond
Port Department

DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION
TITLE 49, CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, PART 29
The bidder, under penalty of perjury, certifies that, except as noted below, he/she or any other person associated therewith in the capacity of owner, partner, director, officer, manager:
• is not currently under suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion, or determination of ineligibility by any Federal agency;
• has not been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded or determined ineligible by any Federal agency within the past 3 years;
• does not have a proposed debarment pending; and
• has not been indicted, convicted, or had a civil judgment rendered against it by a court of competent jurisdiction in any matter involving fraud or official misconduct within the past 3 years.

If there are any exceptions to this certification, insert the exceptions in the following space.

Exceptions will not necessarily result in denial of award, but will be considered in determining bidder responsibility. For any exception noted above, indicate below to whom it applies, initiating agency, and dates of action.

Notes: Providing false information may result in criminal prosecution or administrative sanctions. The above certification is part of the Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Certification.

END OF DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

SANCTUARY CITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
The undersigned, (hereafter "Contractor"), has had an opportunity to review the requirements of City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 (hereafter "Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance" or “SCCO”).

Contractor understands and agrees that the City may choose with whom it will maintain business relations and may refrain from contracting with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor understands the meaning of the following terms used in the SCCO:
a. "Data Broker” means either of the following:
i. The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector business and government agencies;
ii. The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose from that for which it is ultimately used.
b. “Extreme Vetting” means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar services."
Contractor understands that it is not eligible to receive or retain a City contract if at the time the Contract is executed, or at any time during the term of the Contract, it provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE.

Contractor further understands and agrees that Contractor's failure to comply with the SCCO shall constitute a material default of the Contract and the City Manager may terminate the Contract and bar Contractor from bidding on future contracts with the City for five (5) years from the effective date of the contract termination.

By executing this statement, Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of the SCCO and that if at any time during the term of the Contract it ceases to comply, Contractor will promptly notify the City Manager in writing. Any person or entity who knowingly or willingly supplies false information in violation of the SCCO shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a $1,000 fine.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Printed Name: Title:

Signed: Date:

Business Entity:
444

December 16, 2025
Economic Development
PORT
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Charles Gerard, Port Director
Emily Combs, Finance Director
Rita Martinez, Finance Manager
Lizeht Zepeda, Senior Business Assistance Officer
Kyle Lam, Management Analyst
Subject: Port of Richmond Enterprise Fund Financial Overview Report
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for receiving this item.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

October 21, 2025

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

This report provides the City Council with an overview of the Port of Richmond’s financial structure, including how Port revenues are generated through tariffs and leases, how those funds are used, and the funding mechanisms
the Port may access to fund larger infrastructure projects and improvements.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECEIVE the Port of Richmond Financial Report and presentation, which provides an overview of Port revenue sources, tariff structures, and funding mechanisms for
larger infrastructure projects – Economic
Development/Port (Charles Gerard 510-620-6792/Rita
Martinez 510-621-1546).

AGENDA
REPORT
445

December 16, 2025
DISCUSSION:

The Port of Richmond is one of five publicly owned ports in the San Francisco Bay Area and serves as the City’s international maritime gateway for automobile imports, liquid and dry bulk cargo, and general cargo. As an enterprise department, the Port currently operates independently of the City of Richmond’s (City) General Fund and is fully supported through the Port Enterprise Fund.

Port revenues are derived primarily from terminal real estate leases, local port tariffs, and associated service charges. These revenues support the Port’s operations, maintenance, capital improvement projects, debt service obligations, and administrative functions. All income generated through port activities is deposited into the Port Enterprise Fund and is used exclusively for port-related purposes and expenses.

The primary sources of Port operating revenue are:
 Port Tariffs: a formal public document issued by the Port and approved by City Council made up of fees charges, rules, compliance, and regulations. For example, fees are charged to vessels and cargo owners for use of port facilities.  Lease Revenues: Rent paid by tenants and terminal operators for long-term use of port property.
 Service Charges and Miscellaneous Income: Includes utility reimbursements, security fees, and facility use fees.

The Port’s tariff schedule establishes uniform rates for maritime services consistent with industry practices at other public ports. Key tariff components include:
 Dockage: Charges assessed to a vessel for occupying a berth alongside a wharf, pier, or terminal. Dockage is calculated based on the vessel’s length overall (LOA) and the duration of stay, typically measured in 24-hour periods.  Wharfage: Fees applied to cargo moving across the Port’s wharves. It is assessed per ton, per vehicle, or per measurement unit depending on the commodity type.
 Storage: Charges assessed for cargo or equipment remaining on the Port’s facilities beyond a free-time allowance. Storage fees encourage timely cargo movement and compensate for the use of valuable terminal space.

Tariff-based revenues fluctuate with vessel calls, cargo volumes, and tenant activity.

The Port periodically reviews and updates the tariff to maintain competitiveness and ensure cost recovery.

Port revenues are used to fund operational expenses and to invest in maintenance, capital improvements, repairs, and upgrades to Port facilities. Large infrastructure projects at the Port can be financed through mechanisms such as public-private partnerships, tenant-funded investments, grants, bond funding, and self-funding. The successful Honda Port of Entry project at Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) and 446

December 16, 2025
the development of the 200,000-square-foot Portside Commerce Center warehouse at Terminal 3 are examples of tenant-funded investments.

The Port’s financial performance is tied closely to maritime activity levels in the San Francisco Bay Area, global trade trends, and tenant stability. While the Port’s revenues vary from year to year, the Enterprise Fund has maintained a stable operating balance, supporting continued investment in infrastructure, environmental compliance, increased safety, and facility maintenance. This financial stability allows the Port to commence focus on longer-term strategic planning and economic development.

Port staff continue to pursue new tenants and business development opportunities to diversify revenue streams, generate positive economic activity, implement the GreenBlue New Deal and the Green Empowerment Zone, increase the maritime workforce, and ensure long-term sustainability for the Richmond Community and region.

SYNERGISTIC POLICIES:

This report aligns with the City Council’s Priority 2.5: Revitalization of the Port. As an Enterprise Fund, it is important for the Port to share financial data and provide ongoing and transparent updates to the City Council, staff, and the public regarding Port operations, revenue generation, and the Port’s contributions and benefits to the City of Richmond.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Port Enterprise Fund Financial Overview
447
Port Enterprise Fund Financial
Overview
December 16, 2025
Photo: Malcolm Wallace
Courtesy of East Bay EDA
DRAFT 12/9/25 RM
448
Agenda
• Port Enterprise Fund: Definition & Benefits
• Port as an “Economic Engine”
• Tenant Recap - Leases & Tariffs
• Port Financial Reports
• Loan Between City and Port
• Funding Point Potrero Marine Terminal Infrastructure
• Strategic Planning Process
2 449
Enterprise Funds
Used by governments to account for operations that are
financed and operated like a private business
Revenues should be used solely for the operations of the enterprise activity
Should always
have enough
reserves to:
1) Manage risks (revenue shortfalls and
unexpected capital expenses)
2) Maintain creditworthiness with rating agencies
3) Pursue grants that require local funding matches
3 450
Port Enterprise Fund
Revenues generated by the
Port (wharfage fees, dockage
fees, lease revenue) cannot be
used to fund unrelated
government activities.

A well-maintained, selfsustaining port can have
many indirect economic benefits
to support other government
activities.
4 • Transparency and Accountability
• Facility Reinvestment
• Protects Taxpayer Dollars
• Performance Metrics and
Management
• Indirect and Induced Jobs
• Increased Sales and Property Tax
Revenues
• Business Attraction and Retention
• Innovation Hubs
451
Port as an “Economic Engine”
The Port supports jobs, trade, and investment, generating economic activity both directly and indirectly through its operations and tenants.
✓Job creation: The Port supports hundreds of local jobs in longshore work, auto processing, trucking, storage, and maintenance, as well as indirect jobs in retail and services. ✓Business activity: Port terminals manage a range of cargo and services creating steady demand for local businesses that provide logistics, fuel, and vessel services.
✓Revenue generation: The Port contributes to the City’s economy through business taxes and fees that support Port operations, staff, and reinvestment in the facilities.
✓Regional competitiveness: By providing a maritime
gateway, the Port attracts and retains industry in Richmond, supporting the City’s broader economic development goals.

Job Creation
Business
Activity
Revenue
Generation
Regional
Competitiveness
5 452
Port as an “Economic Engine”
• Port invests over $2M on an annual
basis on capital projects, professional
services, staffing that keeps local
resources and businesses working.

Annual Port
Investment
• The Port’s Facilities Assessment project
has highlighted the need for significantly
more local investment on infrastructure
to improve Port facilities and services.

Future Port
Investments
• Port tenants pay approx. $430,000 in
business license and sales tax to the
City of Richmond’s General Fund.

Business
License and
Sales Tax
✓Job Creation
✓Business Activity
✓Revenue
Generation
✓Regional
Competitiveness
6 453
Tenant Recap - Leases and Tariffs
Terminal LEASES TARIFFS
Term 2 AAK AAK
Term 3 Brookfield Properties (& Sause Tugs)
Term 4 Nematode Holdings (& Pt. San Pablo Harbor)
PPMT Foss Tugs Auto Warehousing Company
PPMT Marine Spill Response Corp (MSRC)
PPMT Dutra Group (Dredging Co.)
PPMT City Cruises / Alcatraz Cruises
PPMT National Response Corp / Republic Services
Non-Profit Tenants – No Lease Fee Notes
PPMT Red Oak Victory Ship, RMA Annual debt reduction benefit PPMT Northland Nautical, Sea Scouts Boating & waterfront skills for youth 7 454
Port Lease Revenue
5-Year Trend
8 $1.8
$2.5 $2.4 $2.4
$2.6
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

MILLIONS
455
Port Tariffs Explained
A Port Tariff is a schedule of fees and charges that sets the rates for the use of Port facilities and services.

Dockage
• Dockage is the fee charged to a ship for the use of the Port’s pier or wharf based on the length of the ship and the amount of time it is at the berth.

Wharfage
• Wharfage is the fee charged on cargo that moves across the Port’s wharf - loaded or unloaded from a ship.

Storage
• Storage is the fee charged when cargo or equipment stays on Port property for a period of time after unloading.
9 456
Port Tariff Revenue
5-Year Trend
10 $8,660,533
$8,022,831 $8,256,873
$9,675,362
$8,505,171
$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
AAK Dockage and Wharfage
AWC Dockage
AWC Wharfage and fees
Other Terminals
457
Port Revenues and Expenses
5-Year Comparison
11 $10.7
$11.3
$12.3
$13.9
$13.0
$6.3
$4.9
$5.5
$6.4
$5.8
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
$14.0
$16.0
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

MILLIONS
Revenue Expense 458
Statement of Net Position
5-Year Comparison
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Assets
Cash and investments 3,257,402 6,245,066 10,478,957 16,508,586 20,505,373 Restricted C&I, Receivables 6,180,056 6,058,034 6,252,342 6,039,820 6,258,708 Noncurrent assets - Lease Receivables 64,399,300 56,208,130 56,546,155 53,774,405 Capital assets 36,491,112 32,961,291 29,458,225 26,114,821 23,845,648 Deferred Outflows of Resources 233,714 98,098 233,884 257,769 184,147 Total Assets 46,162,285 109,761,789 102,631,538 105,467,151 104,568,282 Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilitles 321,914 313,689 176,264 412,557 596,679 Unearned Revenue & Deposits Payable 758,423 770,329 770,329 772,601 798,797 Bonds and Long-Term Debt Liability 13,701,169 9,182,363 4,485,306 OPEB and Pension Liability 2,188,877 600,840 898,587 1,255,393 1,111,794 Loan / Advance - General Fund 13,062,225 12,774,486 12,485,370 12,144,862 7,502,950 Deferred Inflows of Resources 279,191 63,839,388 54,687,576 54,289,144 50,786,734 Total Liabilities 30,311,798 87,481,094 73,503,432 68,874,558 60,796,954 Net Position (Defecit)
Net Investment in Capital Assets 36,491,112 32,961,291 29,458,225 26,114,821 23,845,648 Restricted for debt service 150,627 77,892 348,038
Unrestricted (20,791,253) (10,758,488) (678,157) 10,477,772 19,925,679 Total Net Position 15,850,487 22,280,695 29,128,106 36,592,593 43,771,327 12 459
Port Assets, Liabilities, and Net Position
5-Year Trend
13 $46
$109.7
$102.6 $105.5 $104.5
$30
$87.5
$73.5
$68.9
$60.8
$15.8
$22.2
$29
$36.6M
$43.8
$3.2
$6.2
$10.5
$16.5M
$20.5
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Millions
Assets
Liabilities
Net Position
Cash
460
Loan Between City and Port
Since 1977, the City has provided
services and advances to the Port.

Various Promissory Notes were later
combined and entered into as a Loan
Agreement. The General Fund loan
was used to cover operating deficits,
support capital improvements,
ensure continuity of services, and
bridge timing gaps.
• Total Amount: $17,139,855
• Term of Loan: 6/30/2005 to 6/30/2049
• Annual Principal Payment: $150,000
• Annual Offset for Red Oak Victory
Basin-5
14 $13,062,225 $12,774,486 $12,485,370 $12,144,862
$7,502,950
$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
202 1 202 2 202 3 202 4 202 5

DEBT OWED TO GENERAL FUND
$4.5M one-time
payment in
FY2025
461
Funding Port Infrastructure
Public-Private Partnerships (P3s), Tenant
Funded ➢Leveraging long
-term tenant leases and
development agreements to incentivize capital
investment.

State & Federal Grants ➢Pursuing USDOT Port Infrastructure Development Grants and other grants to fund
investment.

Bond Funding ➢Evaluating the issuance of revenue bonds or other municipal financing tools.

Self Funding ➢Directly investing from the Port Enterprise account while also retaining funds needed for
grant local match.
15 462
Strategic Plan Building Blocks
Strategic Plan
Economic Impact Study
Offshore Wind Study (CEC
Grant)
Land Use Considerations
and Restrictions
Port Framework
(SPA or non-SPA)
Infrastructure Assessment Completed
Underway w. Danny W.

Underway w. Danny W.

Starts January 2026
To be Procured/Executed
To be Procured/Executed
Strategic
Proactive
Optimized
16 463
Draft Strategic Plan Tentative Timeline
17 464
Questions
Emily Combs
[email protected]
(510) 620-6790
Charles Gerard
[email protected]
(510) 620-6792
Rita Martinez
[email protected]
(510) 621-1546
18 465

December 16, 2025
Economic Development
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Nannette Beacham, Director of Economic Development James Atencio, Senior Assistant City Attorney
Samantha Carr, Environmental Manager
Subject: Amendment No. 1 to the Golden Bear Transfer Station Agreement.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: Extending the Golden Bear Transfer Station Agreement ensures continued payment of franchise fees established in Exhibit A to the Agreement.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City and Golden Bear Transfer Services, Inc.
(“GBTS”) entered into an exclusive franchise agreement
entitled “Exclusive Franchise Agreement Between City of Richmond and GBTS effective dated June 28, 2004
(“GBTS Franchise Agreement”) and continue through
December 31, 2025 (“Initial Term”). The Franchisee,
GBTS, has provided notice to the City of extension
election 180 days prior to the expiration of the
agreement’s Initial Term.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution to APPROVE the first amendment to the Exclusive Franchise Agreement with Golden Bear
Transfer Services, Inc. extending the term through
December 31, 2035, and AUTHORIZE the city manager
to execute the agreement – Economic Development
(Samantha Carr 510-620-5407).

AGENDA
REPORT
466

December 16, 2025
DISCUSSION:

The City of Richmond’s solid waste and recycling services are provided pursuant to the following agreements:

1. An exclusive Solid Waste Collection Franchise Agreement (Collection Agreement) with Richmond Sanitary Services (RSS), managed by the City of Richmond, and authorized by City Council on June 24, 2025, for a term through June 30, 2040;

2. An exclusive Post-Collection Solid Waste Franchise Agreement (Post-Collection Agreement) with Republic Services, managed by the West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority (RecycleMore) and authorized by RecycleMore on November 13, 2025, for a term through June 30, 2040; and

3. An exclusive Franchise Agreement for solid waste transfer and processing between the City and Golden Bear Transfer Services, Inc. (“GBTS”) dated June 28, 2004 (“GBTS Franchise Agreement”) for a term through December 31, 2025 (“Initial Term”) (Attachment 1).

Earlier this year, the City Council and RecycleMore took action regarding agreements number 1 and 2, above. The third agreement requires further action so as not to let the term of the GBTS Franchise agreement expire. Per Section 3 of the GBTS Franchise Agreement, the agreement may be extended for a period of ten (10) years through and including December 31, 2035, upon written notice to the City or Franchisee, as appropriate, no less than 180 prior to the expiration of the Initial Term. The Franchisee, GBTS, provided notice to the City of extension election more than 180 days prior to the expiration of the agreement’s Initial Term.

Extending the GBTS Franchise Agreement does not affect the City’s Collection Agreement with RSS nor RecycleMore’s Post-Collection agreement with Republic Services. Extending the GBTS Franchise Agreement continues the City’s relationship with GBTS as it relates to GBTS’ payment of franchise fees, established in Exhibit A to the initial GBTS Franchise Agreement.

City staff request the City Council adopt a resolution approving the first amendment to the Exclusive Franchise Agreement with Golden Bear Transfer Services, Inc. extending the term through December 31, 2035, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and all necessary documentation (Attachments 2 and 3).

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Original Contract
Attachment 2 – Resolution
Attachment 3 – Contract First Amendment Draft
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
Reso. No. _____

DocID #58767v1
RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN

AMENDMENT WITH GOLDEN BEAR TRANSFER SERVICES, INC TO
EXTEND THE AGREEMENT FOR TEN (10) YEARS THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 2035
WHEREAS, the City and GBTS entered into an exclusive franchise agreement entitled “Exclusive Franchise Agreement Between City of Richmond and Golden Bear Transfer Services, Inc. (“GBTS”) effective June 28, 2004, through December 31, 2025 (“GBTS Franchise Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of the GBTS Franchise Agreement, the contractor, Golden Bear Transfer Services, Inc provided notice to the City exercising its right to extend the term of the agreement more than 180 days prior to the expiration of the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of the GBTS Franchise Agreement, the term extension shall be for 10 years through and including December 31, 2035; and WHEREAS, all of the terms, conditions, rights and obligations of the parties under the GBTS Franchise Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be changed in any manner except as expressly set forth in this Amendment to the GBTS Franchise Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Article XI, section 7 of the Constitution of the State of California empowers the City to make and enforce within its limits all sanitary and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws for the management of solid waste generated within the City; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Richmond hereby approves the amendment to the Exclusive Franchise Agreement Between City of Richmond and Golden Bear Transfer Services, Inc. extending the term through and including December 31, 2035.
478
Reso. No. _____

DocID #58767v1
******************
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held on Mmmm dd, yyyy, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on Mmmm dd, yyyy.
_______________________________________
Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
479

DocID #58772v1
AMENDMENT No. 1 TO EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN
CITY OF RICHMOND and
GOLDEN BEAR TRANSFER SERVICES, INC.
______
This Amendment No. 1 is entered into effective ___________, 2025, by and between the City of Richmond, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Golden Bear Transfer Services, Inc., a California corporation (“GBTS” or “Franchisee”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and GBTS entered into an exclusive franchise agreement entitled “Exclusive Franchise Agreement Between City of Richmond and Golden Bear Transfer Services, Inc. (“GBTS”) effective dated June 28, 2004 (“GBTS Franchise Agreement”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of the GBTS Franchise Agreement, the contractor, Golden Bear Transfer Services, Inc provided notice to the City exercising its right to extend the term of the agreement 180 days prior to the expiration of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of the GBTS Franchise Agreement, the term extension shall be through December 31, 2035; and
WHEREAS, all of the terms, conditions, rights and obligations of the parties under the GBTS Franchise Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be changed in any manner except as expressly set forth in this Amendment to the GBTS Franchise Agreement; and WHEREAS, Article XI, section 7 of the Constitution of the State of California empowers the City to make and enforce within its limits all sanitary and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws for the management of solid waste generated within the City; and
480

DocID #58772v1
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:

AMENDMENT No. 1 TO GBTS FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
In consideration of the above and the promises and other provisions in this Amendment, the Parties agree to amend the Franchise Agreement as follows:

1. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be extended for a period of 10 years through and including December 31, 2035.

2. All Other Terms And Conditions Remain in Full Force and Effect. All other remaining terms of the GBTS Franchise Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

3. No Other Agreements or Conditions. Except as provided Section 1 above, there are no other or further City and RSS Franchise Agreement amendments or other RSS or City conditions as a pre-requisite to City’s approval and the effectiveness of this Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto executed this First Amendment to be effective as of the date first written above.
“CITY” “GBTS”
City of Richmond, Golden Bear Transfer Services, Inc.,
481

DocID #58772v1
a California municipal corporation a California corporation _________________________________ ____________________________ Mayor Republic Services Area President
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
____________________________ _____________________________ City Attorney
Counsel for GBTS
482

December 16, 2025
PORT
Economic Development
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Charles Gerard, Port Director
Lizeht Zepeda, Senior Business Assistance Officer
Kyle Lam, Management Analyst
Subject: Contract with Moffatt & Nichol for the California Energy Commission Offshore Wind Project Grant
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Port of Richmond has been awarded $750,000 in grant funding from the California Energy Commission
(CEC) under Agreement OSW-25-003 for the Offshore
Wind Conceptual Planning Project. The proposed
$750,000 expenditure is funded by the CEC grant and
will require a matching contribution of $105,610 from the Port Enterprise Fund. The budget for the Port Enterprise Fund will be increased by $750,000 for the project, and revenue account will be increased by $750,000.

The proposed contract with Moffatt & Nichol for
conceptual planning and preliminary engineering services will be in the amount of $750,000, funded entirely by the CEC grant, with no impact to the City’s General Fund.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The Port of Richmond was awarded a $750,000 grant
from the California Energy Commission (CEC) under
Agreement OSW-25-003, funded through GFO-24-701 –
Offshore Wind Energy Waterfront Facility Improvement
Program. The grant will support conceptual planning,
preliminary engineering, and master planning to evaluate and prepare Port facilities for future offshore-wind-related AGENDA
REPORT
483

December 16, 2025
uses. City Council approval is required to accept and
appropriate the CEC grant funds, allocate Port Enterprise Fund matching contributions, and approve a contract with Moffatt & Nichol to perform the technical scope of work upon execution of the grant agreement.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $750,000 in grant funds from the California Energy
Commission (CEC) and Port Enterprise Fund matching
contributions in the amount of $105,610 into the Fiscal Year 2025–2026 Port Enterprise Fund budget;
APPROVE a contract with Moffatt & Nichol in an amount
not to exceed $750,000, with a term from December 16,
2025, through June 30, 2030; and AUTHORIZE the port
director, or their designee to execute all grant-related documents and agreements required – Economic
Development/Port (Charles Gerard 510-620-6792).

DISCUSSION:

Overview of the CEC Offshore Wind Grant
The California Energy Commission (CEC) administers competitive funding programs that advance offshore-wind planning and infrastructure readiness across the state. On September 30, 2024, the CEC issued Grant Funding Opportunity (GFO)-24-701 – Offshore Wind Energy Waterfront Facility Improvement Program, which provides financial support for conceptual planning, design, and engineering studies to prepare California ports for future offshore-wind energy activities.

Through this solicitation, the Port of Richmond submitted the Offshore Wind Conceptual Planning Project proposal to evaluate terminal capacity, identify potential offshore-wind staging and assembly areas, and inform a Port Master Plan for offshore-wind-related uses. The CEC selected the City’s application for funding under Agreement OSW-25- 003 in the amount of $750,000.

On October 8, 2025, the CEC adopted Resolution No. 25-1008-09c at its Business Meeting, approving the City’s grant agreement and adopting staff’s CEQA findings pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15262 and 15306, determining the project to be exempt as a planning and feasibility study (Attachment 1).

Consultant Procurement and Selection
In April 2025, the Port issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for conceptual planning, preliminary engineering, and master-planning services related to offshorewind infrastructure at the Port of Richmond. Moffatt & Nichol submitted the sole response and was determined to be an appropriate, responsible, and responsive proposer based on extensive experience in marine infrastructure, waterfront engineering, and offshore-wind planning for California ports. 484

December 16, 2025
Pursuant to Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 2.52, the City may enter into professional-services agreements for terms not exceeding five years without additional City Council action. The proposed Moffatt & Nichol contract will commence upon City Council approval, and extend through June 30, 2030, consistent with the CEC grant period and the City’s fiscal-year cycle.

Project Scope and Benefits
The Offshore Wind Conceptual Planning Project will assess existing terminals, wharves, and upland areas to determine the Port’s readiness for offshore-wind staging, assembly, and maintenance operations. Deliverables will include conceptual layouts, infrastructure assessments, preliminary engineering, and cost estimates that will inform long-term capital planning and environmental permitting strategies.

This planning effort represents a critical first step toward positioning the Port of Richmond as a potential host for future offshore-wind activities—an industry expected to generate thousands of high-quality jobs and substantial economic benefits. The project supports both local and statewide goals for renewable-energy development, climate resilience, and sustainable waterfront revitalization.

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to accept and appropriate $750,000 in California Energy Commission grant funds, along with $105,610 in Port Enterprise Fund matching contributions, into the FY 2025–26 Port Enterprise Fund budget, and approve a contract with Moffatt & Nichol for an amount not to exceed $750,000, with a term from December 16, 2025, through June 30, 2030 (Attachment 2 and 3).

SYNERGISTIC POLICIES:

This action supports Strategic Goal Area 2 – Increase Revenue and Improve Economic Development, specifically Goal 2.5 – Revitalization of the Port. By investing in offshorewind planning, the City advances its strategy to diversify Port operations, modernize infrastructure, and expand enterprise revenue in line with Council’s priorities for sustainable economic growth.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – CEC Resolution No. 25-1008-09c
Attachment 2 – Proposed Resolution
Attachment 3 – Proposed Contract with Moffat and Nichol 485
RESOLUTION NO: 25-1008-09c

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE ENERGY RESOURCES

CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
RESOLUTION: City of Richmond
RESOLVED, that the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (CEC) adopts the staff CEQA findings contained in the Agreement or Amendment Request Form (as applicable); and
RESOLVED, that the CEC approves agreement OSW-25-003 with the City of Richmond for a $750,000 grant. This project will conduct a conceptual study of potential sites for offshore wind activities in the Port of Richmond and support the development of a Port of Richmond Master Plan. The project includes conceptual design and preliminary engineering to evaluate, plan, and design purpose-built offshore wind infrastructure; and FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the Executive Director or their designee shall execute the same on behalf of the CEC.

CERTIFICATION
The undersigned Secretariat to the Commission does hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of an order duly and regularly adopted at a meeting of the California Energy Commission held on October 8, 2025.

AYE: Hochschild, McAllister, Gallardo, Skinner
NAY: NONE
ABSENT: Gunda
ABSTAIN: NONE
Dated: October 9, 2025
SIGNED BY:

Kim Todd
Secretariat
486
Reso. No. _____

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE $750,000 IN GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION (CEC) AND $105,610 FROM THE PORT

ENTERPRISE FUND MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE OFFSHORE WIND

CONCEPTUAL PLANNING PROJECT, AND TO APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH

MOFFATT & NICHOL
WHEREAS, the California Energy Commission (CEC) administers grant programs to support offshore wind energy planning and infrastructure development in California; and WHEREAS, the City of Richmond applied for and was selected to receive a $750,000 grant (Agreement OSW-25-003) from the CEC to conduct a conceptual study of potential sites for offshore wind activities at the Port of Richmond and to support the development of a Port of Richmond Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, on October 8, 2025, the California Energy Commission adopted Resolution No. 25-1008-9c at its Business Meeting, approving Agreement OSW-25-003 with the City of Richmond for a $750,000 grant to conduct a conceptual study of potential sites for offshore wind activities at the Port of Richmond, support the development of a Port of Richmond Master Plan, and complete conceptual design and preliminary engineering for purpose-built offshore wind infrastructure; and adopting staff’s CEQA findings for the project pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, §§ 15262 and 15306; and
WHEREAS, the grant requires Port Enterprise Fund matching contributions in the amount of $105,610 consisting of both cash and in-kind contributions; and WHEREAS, in April 2025 the Port issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for conceptual planning, preliminary engineering, and master planning services related to offshore wind infrastructure at the Port of Richmond; and
WHEREAS, one firm, Moffatt & Nichol, submitted a response to the RFQ; and following review, Moffatt & Nichol was determined to be an appropriate, responsible, and responsive proposer based on their qualifications and experience with marine infrastructure and offshore wind planning; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 2.52, the City may enter into multi-year professional services agreements provided the term does not exceed five years without additional Council action; and
WHEREAS, the proposed contract with Moffatt & Nichol will have a term beginning on December 2, 2025, and ending June 30, 2030, consistent with the California Energy Commission grant period and the City’s fiscal year, to allow sufficient time for planning, engineering, reporting, and grant closeout.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Richmond, hereby accepts and appropriates $750,000 in grant funds from the California Energy Commission for the Offshore Wind Conceptual Planning Project, together with Port Enterprise Fund matching contributions in the amount of $105,610 into the Fiscal Year 2025–26 Port Enterprise Fund budget, to support conceptual planning, preliminary engineering, and master planning efforts for offshore wind infrastructure at the Port of Richmond.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Richmond approves a contract with Moffatt & Nichol in an amount not to exceed $750,000 with a term from December 16, 2025, through June 30, 2030, consistent with the California Energy Commission grant period and Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 2.52; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Richmond authorizes the Port Director, or their designee to execute all grant-related documents and agreements required by the California Energy Commission to implement the grant, and to make any necessary budgetary 487
Reso. No. _____

or administrative adjustments to effectuate the intent of this resolution. ******************
***THE CLERK’S OFFICE WILL COMPLETE THE INFORMATION BELOW**** I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held on Mmmm dd, yyyy, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on Mmmm dd, yyyy.
_______________________________________
Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
488

CITY OF RICHMOND

STANDARD CONTRACT
Department: City Project Manager:

City Project Manager E-mail: City Project Manager Phone No:

Vendor No: Contract No:

Description of Services:

The parties to this STANDARD CONTRACT do mutually agree and promise as follows:

1. Parties. The parties to this Contract are the City of Richmond, a municipal corporation (“the City”), and the following named Contractor:

Contractor Name:

Street Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

Contact Person:

Telephone: Email:

Business License No:
☐ A California corporation, ☐ limited liability corporation ☐ general partnership, ☐ limited partnership, ☐ individual, ☐ non-profit corporation, ☐ individual dba as [specify:] ____________________ ☐ other [specify:] _______________________________

2. Term. The effective date of this Contract is _______________________ and terminates _________________ unless terminated earlier as set forth herein.

3. Payment Limit. City’s total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $______________ (“Contract Payment Limit”) unless a Contract Amendment has been approved by the City Council or City Manager. If this amount includes a contingency, Contractor acknowledges that any use of such contingency shall be for work beyond the original scope of services and requires prior written authorization by the City. If noted below, Compensation for work done under this Contract, shall not exceed as follows:

FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________ FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________ FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________

4. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor agrees to perform all work at its own cost and expense, to furnish all labor, tools, equipment, materials, except as otherwise specified, in accordance with the Service Plan set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

5. City Obligations. City shall make payments to the Contractor in accordance with the Payment Provisions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Port Charles Gerard [email protected] (510) 620-6792 16914 Conceptual Design and Preliminary Engineering Services for Offshore Wind Moffatt & Nichol 1300 Clay St, Ste. 350 Oakland, CA, 94612 Matthew Trowbridge (510) 788-5959 [email protected] 40067255 December 16, 2025 June 30, 2030 750,000.00 489

6. Authorized Representatives and Notices. This Contract is subject to the Authorized Representatives and Notices Provisions (Exhibit C), attached hereto and incorporated herein.

7. General Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions (Exhibit D), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

8. Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the Special Conditions (Exhibit E) (if any), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

9. Insurance Provisions. This Contract is subject to the Insurance Provisions (Exhibit F), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

10. Sanctuary City Compliance Statement. This Contract is subject to the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement (Exhibit G), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.

11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto:

CITY OF RICHMOND,
a municipal corporation [BUSINESS NAME]
(* The Corporation Chairperson of the Board, President, or Vice President should sign below)
By: _________________________ By: ___________________________ Title: ________________________ Title: __________________________ Date Signed: _________________ Date Signed: ___________________ I hereby certify that this Contract (* The Corporation Chief Financial Officer or Assistant has been approved by City Council Treasurer, or Secretary or Assistant Secretary should or the City Manager. sign below)
By: _________________________ By: ___________________________ City Clerk Title: __________________________
Date Signed: ____________________
Approved as to form:
(NOTE: Pursuant to California Corporations Code Section By: _________________________ 313, if Contractor is a corporation or nonprofit organization, City Attorney this Contract (1) must be signed by (a) the Chairperson of the Board, President, or Vice-President and (b) the
Chief Financial Officer or Assistant Treasurer, or
Secretary or Assistant Secretary)
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:

Service Plan Exhibit A
Payment Provisions Exhibit B
Authorized Representatives and Notices Exhibit C
General Conditions Exhibit D
Special Conditions Exhibit E
Insurance Provisions Exhibit F
Sanctuary City Compliance Statement Exhibit G
Moffatt & Nichol
490
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT A

SERVICE PLAN
Contractor shall, to the satisfaction of the Project Manager (set forth in Exhibit B), perform the following services and be compensated as outlined below [or attach service plan if necessary]:

Moffatt & Nichol
See attached scope.
491
Conceptual Design and
Preliminary Engineering
Services for Offshore Wind

PROPOSAL
Prepared for the Port of Richmond
May 2025
P243336
492

PORT OF RICHMOND // TABLE OF CONTENTS
P242864
1 COVER LETTER 1
2 UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORK 2
3 SCOPE OF SERVICES 5
4 SCHEDULE 13
5 KEY PERSONNEL 14
6 SIMILAR ASSESSMENTS RELATED TO OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 36 7 PORT INFRASTRUCTURE RELATED PROJECTS 42
8 DIRECT MANAGEMENT OF OR OVERSIGHT OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH PROGRAMS 46 9 REFERENCES 48
10 RMC CHAPTER REQUIREMENTS 49

FEE PROPOSAL (SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER)
Cover image courtesy of Google Earth.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Rendering of the proposed Humboldt Bay Offshore Wind Heavy Lift Marine Terminal in Samoa, CA.

EVALUATION
CRITERIA #1
Proposal Responds to
all RFP Items
P
493
PORT OF RICHMOND // 1. COVER LETTER // 1
P242864
May 30, 2025
Charles Gerard, Port Director
Port of Richmond
Uploaded to PlanetBids
RE: PROPOSAL FOR PORT OF RICHMOND CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR OFFSHORE WIND Dear Mr. Gerard and Members of the Selection Committee:

The Port of Richmond (Port) is well positioned to play a critical role in the development of the offshore wind (OSW) supply chain on the US West Coast, as there is a shortage of suitable port infrastructure to meet OSW deployment goals and manufacturing at both federal and state levels. This conceptual design and preliminary design phase is critical to position the Port for OSW industry use and additional funding through state, federal and private sources. The Moffatt & Nichol team is best positioned to support the Port on this assignment, given our experience delivering similar OSW port infrastructure projects combined with our in-depth knowledge of the Port’s existing infrastructure.

Our Oakland and Walnut Creek offices have a combined 50 local port infrastructure experts who stand ready to serve the Port on this assignment. We have assembled a strong team to address all aspects of the project scope. In addition to Moffatt & Nichol, our team includes:
» Kearns & West – Community Engagement and Tribal Government Engagement » BW Research Partnership Inc. – Workforce Development Strategy » ENGEO, Inc. – Geotechnical Engineering and Investigations » Towill, Inc. – Topographic Surveys, Utility Locations, Site Surveys » Woolpert, Inc. (formerly eTrac) – Bathymetric Surveys » Power Engineering Construction, Co. – Inspection Boats and Inspection Access Our team is well qualified for this assignment. Not only have we studied the port infrastructure and supply chain needs to support the OSW industry, Moffatt & Nichol has also designed major port infrastructure upgrade projects to be used for staging and integration, manufacturing / fabrication, and operation / maintenance for the OSW industry. This experience spans from concept and feasibility level studies to detailed engineering and construction services, working with wind developers, supply chain stakeholders, port infrastructure owners, and governmental agencies. Through these projects, our team has come to understand the critical factors necessary to select and develop port infrastructure to support the OSW industry. We are serving several other Ports in California to deliver projects funded by the CEC GFO-24-701 OSW Energy Waterfront Facility Improvements Program and therefore well positioned to deliver the scope in compliance with the grant requirements.

This CEC funded work is an important step to position the Port of Richmond at the forefront of the OSW industry on the West Coast. We have the capacity to serve as the lead program manager to oversee all aspects of this work in close partnership with the Port staff and the City of Richmond. We are excited for the opportunity to be a part of this important assignment and look forward to the next steps in your process. Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, do not hesitate to contact me at (510) 788-8959 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

MOFFATT & NICHOL
Matthew Trowbridge, PE, SE
Vice President, Project Manager
1300 Clay Street, Suite 350
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: (510) 645-1238
moffattnichol.com
494
PORT OF RICHMOND // 2. UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORK // 2
P242864

2. UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORK

CALIFORNIA OSW BACKGROUND
The State of California is committed to achieving 100% clean electricity by 2045. OSW energy is central to this objective, with state-level targets of deploying 25 GW of total installed capacity by 2045. To achieve these goals, purpose-built port and waterfront infrastructure is essential.

Ports must support the full life cycle of OSW farm developments, including component manufacturing, staging, assembly, deployment, operations and maintenance. Recognizing this, Assembly Bill (AB) 525 directed the California Energy Commission (CEC) to develop a strategic plan focused on port readiness and infrastructure development to support OSW deployment.

The AB 525 Strategic Plan emphasizes that existing port infrastructure in California lacks the capacity to support the scale of OSW development targeted. Individual turbines are projected to range from 12 to 25 MW, with commercial-scale projects comprising over 100 turbines. The transportation of these components, due to their size and weight, can only be feasibly conducted via maritime routes, necessitating robust manufacturing, staging, integration, and laydown capabilities at California ports.

In response, the OSW Energy Waterfront Facility Improvement Program, implemented under Assembly Bill (AB) 209, was established to fund port improvements. The program outlines three funding categories:
» Category I: Development of retrofit concepts and investment plans. » Category II: Final design, environmental reviews, and construction of infrastructure retrofits. » Category III: Cost-share funding for applicants receiving federal awards aligned with Category I or II objectives.

PROJECT BACKGROUND
The Port of Richmond was awarded $750,000 in its application to Category I funding (GFO-24-701-01) to conduct conceptual design and preliminary engineering studies for OSW terminal development at key port sites, including Terminal 2, Terminal 3, and the Point Potrero Marine Terminal. This project aims to accomplish the following goals:
» Identify port sites that are suitable for OSW industry use. » Assess existing infrastructure within the identified project site boundaries and identify required improvements to support selected OSW activities.
» Advance conceptual design and preliminary engineering to at least a 30% design level. » Establish a solid foundation to support future investment, permitting, and funding decisions. » Conduct early community, agency, and stakeholder engagement to establish communication channels and collaborative relationships. This means the project will be inclusive and reflect community priorities, support economic opportunities, and state’s broader clean energy and workforce development goals. » Position the Port of Richmond to contribute to California's clean energy transition while creating local job opportunities.

The assessment will evaluate all Port properties with a focus on the approximately 216 acres at Terminal 2, Terminal 3, and the Point Potrero Marine Terminal. The work includes assessing available or potentially available sites to support OSW port and facility activities such as:
» Manufacturing and fabrication of OSW turbine components (e.g., blades, nacelles, towers, floating foundations, mooring components, cables, etc.)
» Operations and maintenance (O&M) facilities and berths » Component laydown and logistics hub
» Other OSW site uses as identified as part of the study and industry outreach Currently, no single port in California can meet all industry requirements, and according to GFO-24-701-01 grant funding solicitation, up to 16 large and 10 small purpose-built ports may be needed statewide to support full industry buildout over the next decade. The Port of Richmond's strategic location in the San Francisco Bay, extensive berth availability, access to deep-water navigation channels, and a strategic position within the San Francisco Bay, near the five existing California OSW

EVALUATION
CRITERIA #1
Understanding of
Port's Goals and
Objectives
P
495
PORT OF RICHMOND // 2. UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORK // 3
P242864
lease areas, positions it as a vital logistics and supply chain hub. This initiative will lay the foundation for the Port of Richmond’s emergence as a critical OSW hub, capable of attracting future investments and supporting California’s clean energy transition.

AGREEMENT GOALS
The goals of the CEC Agreement are to:
» Strengthen OSW Port Readiness: Position the Port of Richmond as a foundational OSW supply chain hub by improving its infrastructure to accommodate OSW industry needs.
» Enable OSW Manufacturing and Supply Chain Activities: Plan and design essential infrastructure, such as upland areas and heavy-lift wharves and berths to support the manufacturing, assembly, staging, and transportation of OSW components. Develop detailed cost, schedule, and regulatory approval requirements to prepare the site for phased development and further investment.
» Support Resilient OSW Operations: Plan and design port facilities to ensure long-term adaptability and resilience, including accommodating future OSW technology advancements and addressing climate-related risks such as sea level rise and extreme weather events. Utilize existing facilities to the largest extent possible. » Create Workforce Development Strategy and Emissions Reduction Strategy: Create actionable strategies for workforce training, skill development, and emissions reduction to align with state goals and the Port's sustainability objectives. » Reduce the Pollution Burden on Richmond Residents: Support the clean energy transition by designing OSW port infrastructure and operations that will lead minimizing emissions, improve regional air quality, and reduce environmental impacts on surrounding communities.
» Provide Good Quality Port Jobs for Richmond Residents: Prioritize the creation of high-quality, accessible jobs for Richmond residents in port infrastructure development, OSW supply chain activities, and long-term operations. » Limit Potential Environmental Impacts: Utilize existing facilities and minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible.

Identify environmental and community benefit opportunities to be incorporated into the plans. » Facilitate Comprehensive Stakeholder Engagement: Conduct extensive engagement with industry stakeholders, local communities, and Tribal governments to guide project planning, and its future development, and maximize equitable benefits.

AGREEMENT OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the CEC Agreement are to:
» Coordinate with Key OSW Stakeholders: Engage with up to 15 OSW stakeholders, including three to five West Coast leaseholders, two to four floating platform OEMs, two to three wind turbine OEMs, and two to three federal and state agencies to integrate their operational and logistical needs and requirements into the Port's planning and design process.

Also, create a TAC group consisting of representatives from stakeholders to advise and guide the Port during the project. » Define Site Boundaries and Conduct Conceptual Site Use Study: Conduct a detailed assessment of site availabilities within the Port, and identify the boundaries, three to five OSW port site uses, infrastructure improvement needs, and master plan alternatives to be evaluated further before preliminary engineering design. » Complete Preliminary Engineering Design: Advance selected sites to up to a 30% engineering design stage, detailing infrastructure needs, Class 5 cost estimates, and preliminary schedules to support future permitting and investment. » Enhance Port Resilience for OSW Operations: Integrate adaptability measures into the planning and design process to address future OSW technology advancements and mitigate climate-related risks, including sea level rise and extreme weather.
» Establish Workforce Development and Community Collaboration Strategies: Create specific engagement plans to involve communities and Tribal governments in the planning and development processes. 496
PORT OF RICHMOND // 2. UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORK // 4
P242864
FIGURE 1. WHY CHOOSE THE MOFFATT & NICHOL TEAM?
PORT

INFRASTRUCTURE

IS OUR CORE

BUSINESS
We employ the largest and most experienced group of specialized marine engineers and port planning professionals in the US and, for the past three years, Moffatt & Nichol has been ranked #1 in Ports and Marine Facilities by Engineering News-Record.

FLOATING OSW

EXPERIENCE
We understand the OSW industry including the logistics to construct and operate a floating OSW terminal. We are leading the engineering for the first OSW Port terminals on the U.S. West Coast at the Ports of Humboldt and Long Beach. In addition, Moffatt & Nichol has worked with multiple floating OSW developers and operators in the U.S. This in-depth knowledge and experience of floating OSW design, construction, and operations will add value to the Port on this assignment.

OSW SUPPLY
CHAIN

EXPERIENCE
Our team has led studies performed to identify OSW supply chain opportunities at ports on the U.S.

West Coast. These include delivering the AB 525 Port Readiness Plan and AB 525 Workforce Development Readiness Plan in California, serving as the port consultant for the NREL West Coast Ports Strategy Study, and delivering several port supply chain studies for Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) such as the Port of Coos Bay Infrastructure Assessment for Offshore Wind Development (BOEM 2022- 073), California Floating Offshore Wind Regional Port Assessment (BOEM 2023-010), California Floating Offshore Wind Regional Ports Feasibility Analysis (BOEM 2023-038), and Hawai’i Floating Offshore Wind Regional Ports Assessment (BOEM 2024-039). Through these assignments, the Moffatt & Nichol Team has developed a deep understanding of the potential supply chain opportunities for ports in the floating OSW industry.

SITE SELECTION

TO DETAILED
DESIGN
Our team has significant experience in site selection studies for OSW port terminals working with wind developers, port authorities, regulatory agencies, and landowners in the U.S. Moffatt & Nichol is the industry leader in detailed design projects to upgrade existing port facilities in the U.S. to serve the OSW industry. We are currently engaged in the detailed engineering or construction phase for eight major OSW port development projects to support BOEM leases on the U.S. East, Gulf, and West Coasts. Moffatt & Nichol has supported clients through design, construction, and operation on five major OSW port terminal projects on the US East Coast (New London State Pier, New Jersey Wind Port, Portsmouth Marine Terminal, Atlantic City O&M Terminal, and EEW Paulsboro Monopile Factory).

PORT

INFRASTRUCTURE

EXPERTS WITH

DEPTH AND

CAPACITY
We are experts in marine infrastructure projects. Our expertise spans multiple industries which provides unique insight into how the OSW market fits within the Port of Richmond’s short-term and long-term strategic plans. Moffatt & Nichol has more than 1,300 staff with expertise focused on waterfront facility planning, permitting, and design allowing us to bring the right people at the right time to complete the work.

PORT OF

RICHMOND

INFRASTRUCTURE

KNOWLEDGE
Through serving the Port of Richmond on the ongoing Point Potrero Marine Terminal Assessment, we have a strong understanding of the Port’s existing infrastructure. The Port of Richmond is uniquely positioned to serve the OSW industry given it’s location and geological conditions (e.g. strong rock at PPMT) – these conditions make the Port an ideal and cost effective location to serve as an OSW hub for heavy lift activities.

COMMUNITY

AND TRIBAL

ENGAGEMENT

EXPERTS
Team member Kearns & West staff have decades of experience engaging with under-resourced communities and Tribes throughout the US, including across California and in the City of Richmond, and designing and facilitating effective engagement and communications processes for large, complex infrastructure projects, including OSW.

COMPREHENSIVE
TEAM
Supporting Moffatt & Nichol, we have assembled a team of experts experienced in OSW, community and tribal engagement, workforce development, and site surveys. Our team can lead the full program and has the capacity to oversee all aspects of this effort working in close partnership with Port staff and the City of Richmond.

FAMILIAR TEAM The same team working with you on the Point Potrero Marine Terminal Assessment will be available to lead this work. This will lead to efficiencies as our team will progress the work considering all available information completed prior to this work as background and reference material. 497
PORT OF RICHMOND // 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES // 5
P242864

3. SCOPE OF SERVICES
TASK 1 GENERAL PROJECT TASKS
This task includes supporting the Port on General Project Tasks and Subtasks 1-13 of the GFO-24-701 Scope of Work.

We will deliver the scope of work exactly as prescribed, so we are only briefly summarizing it here. In addition to the prescribed subtasks, we will also perform project
management, progress meetings, and data review. The Moffatt & Nichol team will help manage the overall delivery and compliance with the grant requirements.
» Subtask 1.1 Products: Establish requirements for submitting project products, including draft and final versions of deliverables. » Subtask 1.2 Kick-off Meeting: Prepare, attend, and participate in a kick-off meeting with the Port, Commission Agreement Manager (CAM), and other relevant CEC staff. We will prepare an agenda before the kick-off meeting and prepare meeting minutes to document the meeting results. We will provide an updated project schedule. » Subtask 1.3 Critical Project Review (CPR) Meetings: Prepare, attend, and participate in CPR meetings with the Port and the CAM. Support the Port as needed to demonstrate that the project complies with the grant requirements and proceeds as planned.
» Subtask 1.4 Final Meeting: Prepare, attend, and participate in the final meeting with the Port, CAM, and CEC staff to present the findings of this project. Both technical and administrative aspects will be covered to deliver the successful closeout of the agreement. » Subtask 1.5 Monthly Calls: Prepare, attend, and participate in monthly calls with the Port and CAM to document progress and demonstrate that the work is being completed on schedule and within budget. » Subtask 1.6 Quarterly Progress Reports and Invoices: Prepare quarterly progress reports in compliance with the Grant Agreement. Submit monthly invoices that are compliant with the template provided by the CAM. » Subtask 1.7 Final Report: Prepare a comprehensive final report in compliance with the CEC Style Manual that describes the purpose, approach, results, and conclusions of the work performed including cover page, credits page, preface, abstract/ keywords/citation page, table of contents/list of figures/list of tables, executive summary, body of the report, references, glossary/acronyms, bibliography, appendices, and attachments. » Subtask 1.8 Match Funds: No match funding is proposed under this agreement, so no effort is anticipated for this task. » Subtask 1.9 Permits: No permits are required for work under this agreement, so no effort is anticipated for this task. » Subtask 1.10 Subawards: Moffatt & Nichol will act as the prime consultant and establish agreements with all subconsultants for all work on this contract. The Port's prime agreement, including the CEC Grant Agreement, will be flowed down to all subcontractors.
» Subtask 1.11 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): Support the Port to prepare a list of TAC members for CAM review and recruit individuals to participate in the TAC. » Subtask 1.12 TAC Meetings: Prepare, attend, and participate in TAC meetings with the Port and the CAM.
» Subtask 1.13 Project Performance Metrics: Support the Port as needed to develop and finalize performance key performance targets and document progress towards those metrics as the project progresses.
» Subtask 1.14 Project Management: Includes project management hours to lead the Moffatt & Nichol team.

All work will be completed in compliance with
the GFO-24-701 Scope of Work for the Port of
Richmond (December 2024). The scope of work
includes the following tasks:
• Task 1: General Project Tasks
• Task 2: Conceptual Study and Port Master Plan
• Task 3: Community Engagement Strategy
• Task 4: Tribal Government Engagement
Strategy
• Task 5: Agency Engagement Strategy
• Task 6: Stakeholder Outreach
• Task 7: Preliminary Engineering
• Task 8: Cost Estimate and Schedule
• Task 9: Emissions Reduction Strategy
• Task 10: Workforce Development Strategy
• Task 11: Evaluation of Project Benefits
EVALUATION CRITERIA #4
Proposed Approach Includes
Project Management Modeling and
Sequencing Across all Tasks and
Deliverables to Ensure Compliance
with Grant Requirements.

P
TASK 1 PRODUCTS
• Kick-off Meeting Notes,
Bi-weekly Meeting Notes,
Monthly Invoice
• Subtasks 1-13 and their
products will be delivered
as defined in the GFO
General Tasks
498
PORT OF RICHMOND // 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES // 6
P242864
» Subtask 1.15 Port Progress Meetings: Includes budget allowance for kickoff and progress meetings with the Port and the Moffatt & Nichol team to coordinate on progress of the work. We will chair meetings and notes will be sent via email to document each meeting. All meetings assume attendance by at least 2 members of the Moffatt & Nichol team. » Subtask 1.16 Data Review: Moffatt & Nichol will work closely with the Port to confirm all previous documents are available, including as-built and record drawings, previous inspection reports, existing geotechnical data, recent surveys, and other miscellaneous project information.

TASK 2 CONCEPTUAL STUDY AND PORT MASTER PLAN
We will develop a Conceptual Design Study and Port Master Plan based on the Port of Richmond’s current infrastructure and OSW industry needs. The team will evaluate alternative site layouts for OSW supply chain and logistics activities for identified project boundaries and the most suitable OSW port site alternative and layout option will be identified and serve as a foundation for preliminary engineering and future project phases. » Data Review
• Moffatt & Nichol will work closely with the Port of Richmond to screen all sites within the Port, including terminals owned by the Port and others, with a primary focus on PPMT, Terminal 2, and Terminal 3. • Compile and analyze existing data on the terminals, including as-built drawings, geotechnical reports, environmental studies, permits, and the current Port Master Plan.
• Identify data gaps and confirm additional data needs to inform the study. » Conceptual Design Study
• Assess potential port sites based on OSW industry needs, considering site location, size, navigational access, and existing infrastructure.
• Define functional uses within selected areas, such as for manufacturing, assembly, laydown, O&M support, and workforce training.
• Develop a Basis of Design (BOD) and conduct stakeholder and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) workshops to finalize criteria for selected uses. The BOD is a living document and will address the following:
– Project Background
› Project Purpose and Use Options Summary
› Site Description and Location
› Datum and Units
› Governing Codes, Standards, and References
› Existing Surveys
– Determine site options/locations within the Port (both public and private sites) – Functional Requirements
– Basis of Operations
– Site Conditions
› Metocean Conditions (tides, sea level rise, tsunami, extreme water level, current, wind, wave, etc.) › Geotechnical Conditions
– Design Criteria
› Floating OSW System Dimensions and Weights
› Shipbuilding Site Requirements
› Design Vessel
› Channel Width/Depth
› Berth Pocket Requirements (water depth, geometry)
› Air Draft requirements and bridge clearances
› Sinking Basin Requirements
› Wet Storage Requirements
499
PORT OF RICHMOND // 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES // 7
P242864
› Seismic Design Criteria and Performance Requirements
› Settlement Criteria
› Operation and Vehicle Loading Requirements
› Design Loads
– Civil Design Criteria (stormwater, grading, fire water, potable water, sewer, finish surface) – Electrical Design Criteria (assume all-electric facility, shore power, vehicle charging, site lighting, building power, equipment and tools, cranes, and other miscellaneous loads) • Conceptual Design Options: Identify several conceptual design options for the preferred sites and site uses. Develop construction costs and schedule estimates of the options.

Work closely with the Port to identify the preferred option. » Port Master Plan
• Prepare a Port Master Plan incorporating the preferred conceptual design alternative and strategic OSW uses.
» Project Graphics
• Create graphics illustrating proposed site configurations and master plan visuals to support stakeholder engagement and future applications.

TASK 3 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
The team will develop a Community Engagement Strategy (CES) to inform, educate, and involve local community members in project planning. Our engagement partner, Kearns & West (K&W), working with Moffatt & Nichol team members, will work closely with the Port of Richmond staff to develop a CES that will serve as the “roadmap” for meaningful, effective engagement with local community members, including under-resourced communities, throughout the project. The strategy will identify desired public participation outcomes for the project and detail specific stakeholder communication and engagement activities to achieve those outcomes. The strategy will include a timeline for implementing engagement activities that is directly connected to the development timelines for the technical work associated with the project. It will also outline innovative approaches to reach members of the community and stakeholders who may not ordinarily participate in the planning process and be grounded in the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) Core Values and the (American Institute of Certified Planners) (AICP) Code of Ethics. We will:
» Develop a comprehensive strategy outlining how the Port will identify and engage diverse community stakeholders and under-resourced groups to make sure of broad participation and representation throughout the project. » Align engagement activities with the project’s technical and grant funding schedule to deliver integration and impact. » In Phase 1 (Pre-Planning):
• Identify key communities and stakeholder organizations working closely with the Port. • Prepare a stakeholder list and interview guideline using team knowledge, local relationships, and desktop research.
• Draft a Pre-Planning CES Outline for the Port review, using local insights to refine future engagement phases.
» In Phase 2 (Post-Planning):
• Conduct early outreach via virtual interviews with up to 12 community members; use snowball sampling to expand participation.
• Analyze and summarize interview findings in an Interview Summary Report. • Prepare a Post-Planning CES integrating community input and aligned with Port planning priorities.
• Submit the draft Post-Planning CES to the project team for incorporation into the technical study.

TASK 2 PRODUCTS
• Draft Conceptual Study
and Port Master Plan
Report
• Final Conceptual Study
and Port Master Plan
Report
TASK 3 PRODUCTS
• Pre-planning Community
Engagement Strategy
Report
• Post-planning Community
Engagement Strategy
Report
• End-of-project Community
Engagement Strategy
Report
500
PORT OF RICHMOND // 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES // 8
P242864
» In Phase 3 (End-of-Project):
• Finalize the CES, incorporating Port feedback and outcomes from prior phases. • Document stakeholder insights, key engagement activities, and recommended communication tools and timelines for future implementation.
» Make sure the CES directly informs technical workstreams such as infrastructure assessments and project development strategy formulation.
» Prepare pre-planning, post-planning, and end-of-project Community Engagement Strategy Reports that will summarize community outreach strategy developments and efforts.

TASK 4 TRIBAL GOVERNMENT ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
The team will develop a Tribal Government Engagement Strategy to provide meaningful consultation and engagement with California Native American Tribes and the integration of Indigenous perspectives into project planning. The strategy will address cultural, environmental, and historical concerns and ensure these are considered in Port project development efforts. It will be aligned with applicable state and federal consultation protocols and coordinated with the broader CES (Task 3).

The strategy will include a background and identification process and outline the engagement program with detailed activities for early informal engagement and, where requested, formal government-to-government consultation. It will reflect Tribal sovereignty and be informed by Tribal members’ deep historical, cultural, and ecological relationships to the land and water within the project area.

We will develop a comprehensive strategy outlining how the Port will identify Tribes in the region surrounding the Port and establish consultation channels in alignment with applicable state and federal guidelines. The team will:
» Develop a strategy outlining how the Port will identify and engage Tribes in the region surrounding the Port. » Align engagement activities with state and federal consultation protocols, including coordination with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC).
» Make sure the strategy is coordinated with the CES to avoid duplication and support integrated stakeholder planning. » Phase 1 (Pre-Planning):
• Identify Tribal entities and key regional Tribal experts with input from the NAHC tribal contact list. • Collaborate with the Port to prepare a Tribal interviewee list and an interview guide grounded in local context and Tribal history.
• Prepare and review draft communications for initiating outreach to Tribes; ensure all Tribes from the NAHC list are contacted in recognition of Tribal sovereignty.
• Draft a Pre-Planning Tribal Government Engagement Strategy Outline for Port review to inform interview content and subsequent engagement phases.
» Phase 2 (Post-Planning):
• Conduct early outreach via virtual informal interviews with up to 8 Tribal experts; use insights to identify other key voices.
• Analyze and summarize interview findings in an Interview Summary Report. • Prepare a Post-Planning Tribal Government Engagement Strategy reflecting input from Tribal participants and aligned with project objectives. • Submit the draft Strategy to the project team for integration into the technical study. » Phase 3 (End-of-Project):
• Finalize the Tribal Government Engagement Strategy incorporating Port feedback and lessons learned.
• Document Tribal insights, engagement activities, and recommendations for future government-to-government coordination and cultural resource consideration. » Prepare pre-planning, post-planning, and end-of-project Tribal Government Engagement Strategy Reports that will summarize strategy developments and efforts.

TASK 4 PRODUCTS
• Pre-planning Tribal
Government Engagement
Strategy Report
• Post-planning Tribal
Government Engagement
Strategy Report
• End-of-project Tribal
Government Engagement
Strategy Report
501
PORT OF RICHMOND // 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES // 9
P242864
TASK 5 AGENCY ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
The Moffatt & Nichol team will develop a strategy to collaborate with Federal, State, and local agencies to provide regulatory input, compliance, and alignment with the needs, permitting requirements, and coordinated project implementation. We will:
» Phase 1 (Pre-Planning):
• Identify and compile a robust list of relevant Federal, State, and local agencies working closely with the Port of Richmond, City of Richmond, and State agency partners (e.g., CEC and CSLC). • Agencies will include regulatory and permitting bodies (e.g., CEC, California Coastal Commission, CSLC), utility and infrastructure providers (e.g., PG&E), environmental and transportation agencies (e.g., CalEPA), and funding/program administrators (e.g., BOEM, DOE, MARAD).
• Prepare a Pre-Planning Agency Engagement Strategy that outlines the list of agencies, engagement objectives, agency roles, and coordination frameworks for Port and CAM review. » Phase 2 (Post-Planning):
• Conduct outreach meetings and workshops with identified agencies to gather input on permitting pathways, infrastructure assessments, compliance considerations, and funding opportunities. • Establish communication protocols and data-sharing practices to support future project and environmental review, technical studies, and other planning efforts.
• Summarize key coordination activities, feedback, and recommendations in a Post-Planning Agency Engagement Strategy Report.
• Refine the strategy to reflect agency guidance, regulatory requirements, and identified collaboration opportunities.
» Phase 3 (End-of-Project):
• Finalize the Agency Engagement Strategy, incorporating final input from engaged agencies and project partners.
• Document interagency coordination mechanisms, regulatory timelines, communication channels, and implementation roles.
• Align the final strategy with technical deliverables and the Port’s OSW infrastructure goals.
» Prepare pre-planning, post-planning, and end-of-project Agency Engagement Strategy Reports that summarize strategy developments and coordination efforts.

TASK 6 STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH STRATEGY
The team will develop a strategy to engage with key OSW stakeholders to identify infrastructure needs for the California OSW supply chain and logistical operations and requirements. This outreach will help define the Port of Richmond’s potential role within California’s multi-port strategy and align project planning with state objectives, industry needs, and local impact considerations. We will:
» Phase 1 (Pre-Planning):
• Identify key OSW stakeholders working closely with the Port of Richmond, City of Richmond, and State agency partners (e.g., CEC and CSLC).
• Develop a stakeholder list and prepare a Pre-Planning Stakeholder Engagement Strategy for the Port and CAM review. » Phase 2 (Post-Planning):
• Conduct outreach meetings with key OSW industry stakeholders, including West Coast OSW leaseholders (5), OSW original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), up to 5, as well as representatives from the local supply chain and port communities, to inform project scoping and identify opportunities.
• Gather input on infrastructure and equipment needs, discuss the Port’s potential role in supporting OSW activities, and provide alignment with California’s multi-port development strategy. • Summarize coordination efforts and stakeholder feedback in a Post-Planning Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Report, detail the findings, and provide a roadmap for continued engagement.

TASK 5 PRODUCTS
• Pre-planning Agency
Engagement Strategy
Report
• Post-planning Agency
Engagement Strategy
Report
• End-of-project Agency
Engagement Strategy
Report
502
PORT OF RICHMOND // 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES // 10
P242864
» Phase 3 (End-of-Project):
• Finalize Stakeholder Engagement Strategy, incorporating feedback from stakeholders and aligning with final project development plans.
• Document interagency coordination mechanisms, communication channels, stakeholder insights, and industry partnership integration for future implementation. » Prepare pre-planning, post-planning, and end-of-project Stakeholder Outreach Strategy Reports summarizing initial strategy development, stakeholder input, identified needs, and key outcomes of the engagement process.

TASK 7 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
The team will conduct preliminary engineering for the selected OSW port site alternative and Basis of Design criteria developed in Task 2, e.g., for waterfront manufacturing and supply chain infrastructure, and detail the upgrades needed to support OSW activities and port development in alignment with Assembly Bill (AB) 3. This task will prepare the project to initiate the CEQA environmental review process. We will:
» Conduct field investigations and survey to address data gaps identified in Task 2. This includes geotechnical investigations and site surveys such as topographic, bathymetric, submerged aquatic vegetation, and subsurface utility assessments. The team will document findings in a Field Investigations and Surveys Report. • Geotechnical Investigations: Geotechnical investigations will be conducted by ENGEO, a team member with a strong understanding of the Port’s infrastructure and extensive experience in geotechnical assessments and analysis. The scope includes:
– Review of historical aerial photographs and maps to outline historical shoreline conditions, aiding in the characterization of geotechnical and geological contexts. – Utilize geotechnical subconsultant ENGEO’s existing database of historical borings at Point Potrero, including those adjacent to Terminal 3 and planned borings at Terminal 2, to supplement previously collected data. – If the study area expands to private properties along the Richmond Channel, leverage prior data from ENGEO’s work at several terminals along the channel.
– Address existing data gaps related to the hardness of sedimentary rock beneath Point Potrero Terminal:
› Supplement data with cored borings into bedrock in the terminal backlands. › Conduct seismic refraction lines to evaluate rock strength and bearing capacity in shallow bedrock zones. › Proposed effort: 2 days of drilling/coring and 1 day of geophysical survey. – Prepare a geotechnical report synthesizing existing and supplemental data. The report will characterize geotechnical conditions and address:
› Geotechnical and geological considerations, including seismicity, liquefaction, seismic slope stability, non-engineered fill, and compressible bay deposits.
› Conceptual mitigation strategies for identified geotechnical risks. › Vertical and lateral pile capacity estimates for up to three pile types at three locations (piles to be selected/designed by Moffatt & Nichol).
› Typical bearing capacity ranges for foundations on bedrock. • Site Topographic Surveys: Towill, a site and topographic survey expert team member, will lead the development of the Topographic Basemap. The scope includes:
– A 1" = 40' scale topographic survey map will be generated with 1-foot contour intervals and a digital terrain model (DTM) covering the project area boundaries.
– As part of this effort, survey control will be established and approximately seven flight panels will be set. – An orthophoto suitable for integration with CAD or GIS platforms will be developed for the project boundaries area.

TASK 6 PRODUCTS
• Pre-planning Stakeholder
Outreach Strategy Report
• Post-planning Stakeholder
Outreach Strategy Report
• End-of-Project
Stakeholder Outreach
Strategy Report
503
PORT OF RICHMOND // 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES // 11
P242864
• Hydrographic Survey: Hydrographic and bathymetric surveys and submerged aquatic vegetation surveys will be performed by Woolpert, a hydrographic survey expert team member. The scope includes:
– Mobilization: Project setup, vessel and equipment transportation, crew logistics. – Control Survey: Recovery of existing control points, RTK and static GNSS observations via Trimble R8/R10 receivers. – Data Acquisition:
› RTK/PPK full-coverage multibeam bathymetry
› Patch test calibration
› Use of R2Sonic 2024 MBES, Applanix POS M/V INS, and AML SVP – Data Processing: GNSS + Inertial trajectory computation, point cloud sanitization, and data reduction. – Deliverables: Subsampled ASCII XYZ files and CAD plot with contours and soundings. • Marine Infrastructure Inspections: Moffatt & Nichol will conduct marine infrastructure inspections, as needed, for sites that have not yet been inspected, utilizing Power Engineering Construction team member marine and boat equipment. » Progress preliminary engineering design to a 30% design level for selected design criteria and site layout to the extent that the CEQA environmental document process can begin. A total of 20 drawing sheets will be developed and delivered as part of this task, as listed below:
• Cover Sheet
• Index of Drawings
• General Notes Sheets
• Existing Conditions Plan
• Demolition Plan
• Demolition Section
• Overall Site Plan
• Typical Cross-Section Drawing Sheet
• Geotechnical Improvement Plans and Sections (3 sheets) • Marine Structural Plans and Sections (5 sheets)
• Civil Plans and Sections (2 sheets)
• Miscellaneous (2 sheets)
» Prepare Draft Preliminary Engineering Design Report and Drawings detailing proposed upgrades, required permits and approvals, and recommended next steps.

TASK 8 COST ESTIMATE AND SCHEDULE
The Moffatt & Nichol team will develop a comprehensive Class 5 cost estimate and project schedule to inform the project’s financial planning and development timelines. The estimate will incorporate preliminary engineering inputs and site-specific requirements and serve as the foundation for determining revenue needs and financing strategies. We will:
» Prepare a Cost Estimate Memorandum that includes a Class 5 cost estimate (accuracy range of 30 to +50%) covering design, construction, equipment, and financing. The estimate will support revenue recovery planning and investment analysis. » Document the Basis of Cost Estimate, including all assumptions, methodologies, and estimation techniques used in the development of the cost model. » Prepare a Project Schedule Memorandum outlining estimated timelines for design, permitting and regulatory approvals, and construction.

TASK 7 PRODUCTS
• Field Investigations and
Surveys Report
• Draft Preliminary
Engineering Design Report
• Draft Preliminary
Engineering Design
Drawings
• Final Preliminary
Engineering Design Report
• Final Preliminary
Engineering Design
Drawings
TASK 8 PRODUCTS
• Draft Cost Estimate
Memorandum
• Draft Project Schedule
Memorandum
• Final Cost Estimate
Memorandum
• Final Project Schedule
Memorandum
504
PORT OF RICHMOND // 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES // 12
P242864
TASK 9 EMISSIONS REDUCTION STRATEGY
We will develop a comprehensive strategy to plan for reducing emissions associated with the construction and operational phases of the selected purpose-built OSW) terminal(s). The strategy will help address equipment selection and operational practices aimed at minimizing emissions from construction machinery, terminal equipment, and vessel operations. The team will:
» Develop an Emissions Reduction Strategy outlining emissions mitigation approaches for construction activities, terminal operations, and vessel interface, including low- and zero-emission equipment options. » Identify methodologies in analyzing emissions based on anticipated equipment use and identify feasible strategies for emissions reduction, including the integration of electric or alternative fuel-powered technologies. » Coordinate with equipment manufacturers and contractors to assess the availability, cost, and performance impact of low-emission machinery and technologies. » Document strategy and recommendations in an Emissions Reduction Strategy Memorandum summarizing proposed methodologies and practices, equipment, and phased implementation for both construction and terminal operations.

TASK 10 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
The team will develop a strategy to assess and address workforce needs for both the construction and operational phases of the OSW terminal project. This strategy will evaluate existing labor capacity in Richmond, the East Bay, and the greater San Francisco Bay Area, identify workforce gaps, and recommend actionable steps and a strategy for workforce needs assessment, development, and training. The team will:
» Conduct a labor market assessment to identify job roles required for construction and terminal operations, evaluate local workforce capabilities, and determine gaps in skills and qualifications. » Develop a comprehensive Workforce Development Strategy outlining training programs, partnerships, and resources needed to close skill gaps, with a focus on advancing opportunities for under-resourced and underserved communities (i.e. AB617 Communities, EPA IRA Disadvantaged Communities, and MTC Equity Priority Communities).
» Detail strategies for long-term workforce sustainability, including pathways for career advancement and talent retention across the OSW supply chain.

TASK 11 EVALUATION OF PROJECT BENEFITS
The goal of this task is to report the benefits resulting from this project.

The Initial Project Benefits Questionnaire shall be initially completed with ‘Kick-off’ selected for the ‘Relevant data collection period’ and submitted to the CAM for review and approval. » The Initial Project Benefits Questionnaire will be initially completed with ‘Kick-off’ selected for the ‘Relevant data collection period’ and submitted to the CAM for review and approval.
» Complete the Annual Survey by January 31st of each year with project progress, news media and publications, and follow-on funding and awards received information. » The Final Project Benefits Questionnaire shall be completed with ‘Final’ selected for the ‘Relevant data collection period’ and submitted to the CAM for review and approval. » Respond to CAM questions regarding the questionnaire drafts.

TASK 9 PRODUCT
• Emissions Reduction
Strategy Memorandum
TASK 10 PRODUCT
• Workforce Development
Strategy Memorandum
TASK 11 PRODUCTS
• Initial Project Benefits
Questionnaire
• Annual Survey(s)
• Final Project Benefits
Questionnaire
505
PORT OF RICHMOND // 4. SCHEDULE // 13
P242864

4. SCHEDULE
Schedule and budget are critical and clearly defined within the RFP. The team has proposed a scope of work that can be delivered within the period of performance, meet the identified deadlines, and stay within budget. To hit the ground running, outreach efforts will start right away and tasks that can are running concurrently. Our schedule is designed to deliver the Offshore Wind Port Infrastructure Conceptual Design and Preliminary Engineering project for the Port of Richmond no later than September 4, 2026. This schedule assumes a 2-week review period for each deliverable milestone. 506
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 14
P242864

5. KEY PERSONNEL

PROJECT TEAM STRUCTURE
To achieve your goals, Project Manager Matt Trowbridge, PE, SE, has assembled a team of in-house personnel and qualified professional teaming partners – all with a strong California presence, experience, and knowledge of the OSW industry. These are firms with which we have worked before and who we know can provide added value to our team. Moffatt & Nichol’s Oakland and Walnut Creek teams will be responsible for the day-to-day management of tasks related to this contract.

The following are brief qualifications for each team member firm. These are followed by our team organizational chart on page 17, with key team members resumes beginning after that. As the project manager, Matt will be the Port of Richmond’s main point of contact and have prime responsibility and final authority for the work.

MOFFATT & NICHOL INC. // PRIME CONSULTANT
Moffatt & Nichol is a specialized maritime planning and engineering firm, having been ranked #1 by Engineering News-Record (ENR) in this category for the past three years. In 1945, John G. Moffatt and Frank E. Nichol formed partnerships in California and Oregon to provide engineering design services to the growing marine infrastructure of the west coast of the United States (U.S.). We provide practical solutions to clients in the marine terminal, energy, federal, transportation, environmental, and urban development markets around the world. We are a multidisciplined professional services firm with specialized expertise in structural, coastal, and civil engineering; environmental sciences; economic analysis; inspection and rehabilitation; and program management solutions. Moffatt & Nichol has for decades been an industry-leading consultancy addressing the specific offshore and nearshore needs of the energy industry—from liquid bulk and LNG terminals to deep offshore foundations, offshore floating Figure 2. Moffatt & Nichol is a leader in the OSW industry, building on our firm's 80-year maritime history. 507
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 15
P242864
facilities, and deep-water mooring systems. We have leveraged this experience, along with our transportation logistics and coastal processes expertise, to provide services for the OSW port industry.

Moffatt & Nichol has, for decades, been an industry leading consultant addressing specific offshore and nearshore needs of the energy industry – from liquid bulk and liquified natural gas (LNG) terminals to deep offshore foundations, offshore floating facilities, and deep-water mooring systems. We have leveraged this experience, along with our transportation logistics and coastal processes expertise to service the OSW industry. Our specialty is retrofits of existing terminals and design of new marine terminals. These projects range from increasing the loading capacity of lay down areas at an existing terminal to full planning and design for a new terminal at a brown or greenfield site. With our extensive port planning and design experience, we have considerable knowledge of existing conditions and capabilities of ports and large marine terminals on the U.S. West Coast. Our knowledge of the OSW industry combined with our experience in ports leads to efficient and cost-effective designs for the OSW industry.

Our extensive work with developers, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and port authorities in the OSW industry has given us a firm understanding of the geometrical, logistics, and loading requirements for OSW turbine assembly, wind turbine generation (WTG) staging, manufacturing, and operations & maintenance (O&M) marine terminals.

Moffatt & Nichol has developed the most comprehensive range of specialized port disciplines in the industry. We can integrate our unique capabilities and skills to meet specific project demands, from economics and financial analysis to planning, design, and construction document preparation to post-construction award services and program management. Moffatt & Nichol has an unrivaled portfolio of more than 11,000 projects in more than 50 countries, and a worldwide network of offices that are staffed by more than 1,200 professionals. Our wide range capabilities, together with our extensive network of industry specialist contacts, combined with the collaborative work-share culture of our family and employee-owned firm, allows us to address project challenges quickly and efficiently. Our focus remains on making certain that our clients receive the highest level of support and technical expertise.

BW RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC//WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Founded in 2006, BW Research is a full-service consulting and research firm specializing in economic, supply chain, and workforce development research for diverse public and private entities. BW Research is an international firm of 18 people with offices and staff in San Francisco and other worldwide locations delivering research and strategic consulting that supports stronger communities and drives healthier economies, ecologies, and employment. Their comprehensive understanding of workforce and economic development issues has made them a sought-after partner for governmental agencies, nonprofits, and commercial enterprises. BW’s practice emphasizes climate and clean-energy sectors, and we have led hundreds of workforce, supply chain, community benefit, policy, and market research studies within these sectors, integrating needs for equitable access to opportunities and investments throughout.

ENGEO, INC. // GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND INVESTIGATIONS ENGEO is an award-winning, employee-owned California-based firm with more than 400 geotechnical and civil engineers, geologists, hydrologists, hydrogeologists, environmental scientists, coastal engineers, construction quality-assurance representatives, and laboratory testing specialists serving clients in the U.S. and abroad for more than 50 years. ENGEO serves many iconic and highly visible projects with complex engineering and geologic challenges. They have extensive experience in performing geotechnical engineering services for marine structure projects throughout the Bay Area and beyond, including those for the Port of Richmond. Select projects include the Port of Richmond Terminal 4, Point Potrero Marine Terminal conditions assessment, and Terminal 1 Redevelopment. We have extensive experience along the Richmond Channel including at the Marine Oil Terminals for BP/ARCO (now Kinder Morgan), IMTT, and TransMontaigne. Additionally, they are also currently performing geotechnical services for the Port of Oakland and the Port of San Francisco.

KEARNS & WEST//COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENT ENGAGEMENT K&W is a California-based small business that is a national leader in the domain of stakeholder, community, and Tribal engagement. K&W has 93 employees nationwide, and brings more than 40 years of experience as a neutral third-party planning and facilitating community and Tribal engagement and multi-party negotiation processes on a range of local, statewide, and regional issues. A core focus of K&W’s engagement work involves designing and conducting stakeholder assessments and then developing and implementing associated engagement and communications strategies and plans to achieve specific project goals.

K&W staff bring nationally-recognized process design and facilitation/mediation expertise as well as a solid foundation and understanding of the complex policy and scientific arenas in which they work. Their staff have decades of experience 508
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 16
P242864
engaging with under-resourced communities and Tribes
throughout the US, including across California and in the City of Richmond, and designing and facilitating effective engagement and communications processes for large,
complex infrastructure projects, including OSW. Most
notably, K&W leads the California Coastal Commission (CCC) SB 286/ Condition 7C Fisheries Working Group for OSW and California Tribal Engagement as well as the California Energy Commission’s (CEC) AB 525 Fisheries Engagement for the
Development of the OSW Strategy. Additionally, K&W leads the design and implementation of BOEM's OSW engagement
with underserved communities and Tribal governments in
California, the Northeast, and the Gulf. More locally in the City of Richmond (and across the Bay Area), K&W has a deep understanding of the communities and potential issues within the City through their work on the Keller Beach Sanitary Sewer Project and the Greenway Rail-Trail Project. Moreover, K&W has deep Tribal qualifications in the region and beyond with their work on the BOEM California OSW Tribal Listening Sessions and the California State University, Systemwide NAGPRA/ CalNAGPRA Policy Development Listening Sessions, to name a couple.

POWER ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION CO. // INSPECTION BOATS

AND INSPECTION ACCESS
Power Engineering, based in Alameda, is a marine contractor with 39 years of experience constructing and rehabilitating in-water infrastructure throughout the West Coast. We are uniquely positioned with an in-house, ADCI-certified diving division that performs structural inspections of piles, wharves, bulkheads, mooring systems, and other marine assets. Our diving operations are supported by a team of approximately 120 full-time employees, including marine superintendents, project managers, and ADCI-certified divers. Their dive team operates from dedicated support vessels and is equipped with high-resolution video, sonar, and underwater measurement tools. We routinely provide inspection services in support of feasibility studies, condition assessments, and engineering – particularly in active port and industrial environments. Our work follows OSHA, USCG, and USACE safety requirements and is conducted in accordance with ASCE Manual of Practice 130 guidelines.

They have performed similar services for the Port of Oakland, Port of San Francisco, Chevron Richmond Long Wharf, and Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO). Their close
proximity to the Port of Richmond enables us to mobilize quickly, and their crews are familiar with the permitting and operational conditions unique to San Francisco Bay.

TOWILL, INC. //TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS, UTILITY LOCATIONS, SITE SURVEYS Towill is an experienced provider of geomatics services and technologies offering a broad range of advanced surveying, mapping, and geospatial solution services which include land surveying; high-accuracy specialty surveying; aerial photography; airborne, terrestrial, and mobile Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR); digital 3D and 2D photogrammetric mapping; volumetrics; and geographic information systems (GIS). Towill has grown into an industry leader with approximately 100

SUPPLEMENTING OUR TEAM

WITH PROVEN PARTNERS

OUR TEAM IS STRUCTURED TO DELIVER THIS PROJECT

TO THE PORT OF RICHMOND TO HELP YOU SUPPORT THE

OSW INDUSTRY
California-based geotechnical engineering firm with
extensive Bay Area experience with our unique geological conditions. The firm also has experience at area ports, including the Port of Richmond at PPMT and on Terminal 4. 2 ENGEO
Formerly eTrac, their San Francisco-based survey team uses multibeam bathymetry to give a seamless representation
of the bathymetry.
6 WOOLPERT
Combines decades of experience with new tools of
engagement to customize their approach using innovative and leading-edge collaborative technology solutions. The firm offers a spectrum of services to help clients identify and connect with the people that lead to project success. 3 KEARNS & WEST
An Alameda-based diving and in-water construction firm
that knows what it takes to deliver these services in the Bay Area. They helped provide inspection boats and access for the recent PPMT Condition Assessments.
4 POWER ENGINEERING
Offers survey teams comprised of industry leaders who
can offer clients expertise in detailed topographic and utility locating surveys.
5 TOWILL, INC.

Nearly 20 years of experience specializing in economic, supply chain, and workforce development research,
including for the OSW industry. Their work has spanned
the country, from the Bay Area to East Coast projects.
1 BW RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP
509
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 17
P242864
employees in offices strategically located throughout California (Bay Area offices in Concord, Emeryville, Hayward, and San Jose) and Colorado.

Towill performs topographic surveys for design using GPS, conventional surveying, and LiDAR techniques. Such surveys are typically performed to produce a detailed map for engineering design or as supplemental data collection to enhance photogrammetric mapping. They have experience performing virtually every type of topographic surveying task.

WOOLPERT, INC. // BATHYMETRIC SURVEY
Woolpert (formerly eTrac, Inc.), established in 2003 as a hydrographic survey, vessel positioning, and instrumentation firm.

Woolpert has quickly grown to include over 70 employees in several offices in the US, including San Francisco. Woolpert provides high resolution topographic scanning services for a range of industry needs. They regularly uses LiDAR in conjunction with high resolution multibeam bathymetry to give a seamless representation of the bathymetry and topography. With the use of LiDAR, they the ability to survey in challenging environments such as areas with safety obstructions and not accessible by boat.

AGENCY ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY

JENNIFER LIM, PE

MARINE STRUCTURES

JIM BRADY, PE

COST ESTIMATING, SCHEDULING

JACK FINK, PE

JERRY NEAL, PE

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND

INVESTIGATIONS

JEFF FIPPIN, PE, GE, QSD (ENGEO)

OSW PORTS AND SUPPLY CHAIN

SPECIALIST

CENGIZHAN CENGIZ, EIT
PORT INSPECTION*

DAMILOLA TAIWO, PE

SEAN HART, PE

TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY,

SUBSURFACE UTILITIES

FRANK BORGES, PLS (TOWILL)

BATHYMETRIC SURVEY

JORDAN KUSHNER, CH (WOOLPERT)

OSW PORT INFRASTRUCTURE

JENNIFER LIM, PE

MOORING AND NAVIGATION

DORIAN BREFORT, PHD, PE

EMISSIONS REDUCTION STRATEGY
MILUŠE TICHAVSKA, PHD

COMMUNITY AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENT

ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
JENNA TOURJÉ-MALDONADO, AICP (K&W)

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

JOSH WILLIAMS (BW)

PROJECT MANAGER
Matt Trowbridge, PE, SE

DELIVERY TEAM

PORT OF RICHMOND

PROJECT PRINCIPAL
Joshua Singer, PE
NOTES
All Personnel Moffatt & Nichol unless noted
* Port Inspection activities will be supported by Power Engineering for in-water work

DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER
Cengizhan Cengiz, EIT

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART AND STAFF QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE As illustrated in our Organizational Chart below, the Moffatt & Nichol team provides a comprehensive delivery strategy to meet any need and achieve your goals for this contract. Resumes for our proposed personnel are included over the following pages. 510
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 18
P242864

PROJECT MANAGER

PORT OF RICHMOND POINT POTRERO MARINE TERMINAL
CONDITION ASSESSMENT, RICHMOND, CA. Project manager
to lead a portwide inspection and condition
assessment of existing infrastructure at the Point
Potrero Marine Terminal including Berths 5-6 (lay
berth), Berths 7-8 (auto terminal), Graving Basins, and Finger Piers. The focus of this work is to provide a baseline condition of existing infrastructure, identify projects to improve safety and security, and develop a long term plan for infrastructure improvements to expand port operations and revenue.

PIER 94/96 OFFSHORE WIND CONCEPTUAL STUDY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Project manager for a conceptual study for the Port of San Francisco to evaluate the use of a 95-acre site by the OSW industry at the port. Performed industry outreach to solicit feedback on site-use options. Developed conceptual engineering drawings, project schedule, and cost estimate.

OFFSHORE WIND AND HEAVY-LIFT MARINE TERMINAL, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CA. Port infrastructure expert for the layout and conceptual design of a heavy-lift marine terminal at Port of Humboldt Bay to support the OSW and other marine industries for this Humboldt Bay Harbor District project. Developed conceptual layouts for the proposed terminal operation, including preliminary design of a heavy-lift wharf, dolphins, berth pocket dredging, channel modifications, and uplands redevelopment. Project included estimation of project budget and schedule to support a federal grant application.

AB 525 SEAPORT AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN FOR OFFSHORE WIND, CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION. Project manager to provide comprehensive evaluation of existing and proposed greenfield port sites to support the OSW industry and to meet California’s deployment targets. This work included significant outreach to the OSW industry (developers, OEMs, operators, etc.) and existing ports and harbors in California. The work evaluated the proximity of ports to current and future planned OSW energy areas. The seaport chapter evaluate OSW industry port needs, determined required number and size of port sites based on California deployment targets, evaluated the availability and suitability of both existing port sites and potential greenfield sites, determined required port infrastructure improvements, evaluated impacts to natural and cultural resources, including coastal resources, fisheries, and Native American and Indigenous peoples, and developed cost estimates and port development timelines. An analysis of the workforce development needs and recommendations for sustained and equitable economic benefits was included.

PORT OF LONG BEACH PIER WIND TERMINAL, LONG BEACH, CA. Project director responsible for site selection, layout, conceptual design, field exploration program, 15 percent design, and environmental document technical studies for a 400-acre new landfill terminal site to support the OSW industry. Work includes working closely with the port to develop a project delivery and funding strategy.

CALIFORNIA OFFSHORE WIND REGIONAL PORTS ASSESSMENT, BOEM, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. Project manager to study the capacity of 17 existing California ports to support development of OSW in California. The study identifies sites that are or may become available for development by the OSW industry. As part of the study an assessment will be made for the ability of existing port sites to support the AB Matt has extensive experience leading
multidisciplinary teams in the design
and construction of marine terminals
and major port infrastructure projects,
including OSW ports and support
facilities. Matt regularly delivers
projects at both greenfield and
brownfield sites, including at or near
active terminals. A seasoned project
manager, he is a strong communicator
and experienced at listening to and
understanding client and stakeholder
needs and managing projects to
address those goals. Matt spent years as
a structural inspector and underwater
engineer-diver and is experienced in
evaluating the condition of marine
structures. He has experience leading
studies, preliminary engineering, and
environmental document technical
studies, as well as delivering detailed
engineering of OSW ports on the U.S.
west and east coasts for both fixed and
floating installations.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 17 / 17

EDUCATION
» MCE, Civil Engineering with
Structural Engineering Emphasis,
2010
» BS, Civil Engineering, 2008

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Engineer: CA (Civil,
#C78789; Structural # S6197), CT,
LA, OR
» Design-Build Professional
(#AS-3745)

MATT TROWBRIDGE, PE, SE
511
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 19
P242864

MATT TROWBRIDGE, PE, SE (CONTINUED)
525 deployment targets (GW, timeline). Project includes an evaluation of the synergies of co-locating OSW and oil and gas platform decommissioning facilities.

CALIFORNIA ALTERNATIVE PORTS ASSESSMENT FOR OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT, CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION. Project manager to identify potential port sites along the Central California coast (between San Francisco and Long Beach) that could serve the OSW industry. The study identifies sites that are or may become available for development by the OSW
industry. As part of the study an assessment will be made for the ability of the identified port sites to support the AB 525 deployment targets (GW, timeline).

STATE PIER WIND STAGING TERMINAL, NEW LONDON, CT. Engineer of record and structural lead for an OSW staging port to support installation of turbines, blades and tower sections. Leading engineering team to develop heavy lift wharves capable of supporting 5000 psf loading during operations and mooring / berthing for OSW installation vessels.

WEST COAST PORTS OFFSHORE WIND STRATEGY STUDY, NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY. Project manager and ports
subject matter expert to provide a desktop evaluation of existing ports in California, Oregon, and Washington to support the OSW industry for staging and integration,
manufacturing, and operations and maintenance activities. A long list of port sites was screened down to a short list of port sites based on their characteristics and ability to meet key requirements for industry use. The team identified required port infrastructure improvements and developed an estimate cost of improvements and an anticipated timeline of when the sites can be ready to serve the industry.

NORTHWEST SEAPORT ALLIANCE OFFSHORE WIND SUPPLY CHAIN
OPPORTUNITIES, SEATTLE AND TACOMA, WA. Project manager
for a conceptual study to evaluate the use of Port of Seattle and Port of Tacoma sites to serve the OSW industry for the Northwest Seaport Alliance.

U.S. PACIFIC OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF REGION INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS AND IMPACTS, BOEM, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR.

Project manager for a $1.5M IDIQ contract with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement. The purpose of the contract is to assess port infrastructure needs and capabilities to support development of floating OSW farms in the Pacific Outer
Continental Shelf region off the coasts of California, Oregon, Washington, and Hawai'i.

PORT OF COOS BAY OFFSHORE WIND INFRASTRUCTURE STUDY, BOEM, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. Project manager to study the existing infrastructure at the Port of Coos Bay to identify required infrastructure improvements to support the OSW industry.

STATE OF MAINE PORT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT, SEARSPORT, ME. Senior technical advisor for a study to select a site for the development of an OSW port. Project includes site
assessment, layout, and preliminary concept design of
multiple sites to serve as marshalling and/or fabrication sites for both fixed and floating foundation wind turbines.

The study included a site evaluation report, preliminary engineering, cost estimates, project schedule development, and conceptual layouts. The project includes an economic analysis of the selected sites to evaluate potential revenue streams based on selected terminal type and compares to the required capital investment to determine a return on investment (ROI).

PORT OF LAKE CHARLES INDUSTRIAL CANAL OFFSHORE WIND
CONCEPT STUDY, LAKE CHARLES, LA. Project manager for a study to evaluate port infrastructure sites for suitability to support the gulf OSW industry as a marshalling and/or fabrication site. Study included layout of several development options including conceptual design of required port infrastructure and improvements to accommodate the proposed operations.

Conceptual layouts and cost estimates were developed for the various scenarios. The study included a high-level schedule aligned with Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s OSW
leasing schedule to identify required timelines for the Port to develop the terminal.

NEW JERSEY WIND PORT, LOWER ALLOWAYS CREEK, NJ. Senior
technical advisor for the detailed design of a wind turbine generation port for import, staging, pre-assembly and
loadout of turbines, towers, and blade components for a large commercial scale OSW facility.

OFFSHORE WIND OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY,
CONFIDENTIAL LOCATION, NY. Senior technical advisor for the design of a site to use as a home port for OSW service operations vessels. These vessels are typically 300 feet long and are used to provide work platforms and accommodations for extended offshore repair scopes. The study identified ideal sites and evaluated several layouts and conflicts with adjacent facilities.

OFFSHORE SUBSTATION FOUNDATION FEASIBILITY STUDY, MA AND NJ.

Concept design task lead for a feasibility study for Ørsted that evaluated innovative foundations for offshore substations at multiple OSW farm sites. Led the development of the design basis effort. The study included developing metocean criteria, concept design, evaluating potential fabrication sites, sea transport and installation, regulatory and permitting review, and cost estimating.
512
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 20
P242864

PROJECT PRINCIPAL

PORT OF LONG BEACH, PIER WIND CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING
PHASE, LONG BEACH, CA. OSW subject matter expert
for the layout and conceptual design of a 400-acre
reclaimed land terminal site to support the OSW
industry. Provided site selection, layout options, 15%
concept design and phasing plan for this terminal at Port of Long Beach.

PORT OF HUMBOLDT BAY OFFSHORE WIND MARINE TERMINAL, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CA. OSW subject matter expert for the layout and 30% design of a marine terminal to support floating OSW on the West Coast of the US. This terminal will act as a staging & integration and floating foundation assembly port. Task included terminal layouts, vessel navigation study, site permitting, geotechnical investigation and engineering, design of marine infrastructure and civil design of uplands for this 180 acre terminal.

STATE PIER COMPLEX OFFSHORE WIND TERMINAL, NEW LONDON, CT. Project director for the detailed design of a wind turbine generation port for Bay State Wind that will import, stage, pre-assemble, and load out turbine, tower, and blade components for large commercial scale OSW installations. The 33-acre terminal currently imports bulk material and will require significant retrofits and upgrades to the existing marine infrastructure. The terminal is being retrofitted to accommodate 5,000 psf heavy lift import and loadout zones at two berths totaling 1,200 LF and an upland capacity of 3,000 psf. In addition, in order to achieve the required acreage more than 7 acres land will be reclaimed and bulkheaded. This will be the first functional OSW port in the U.S. with the capability to service the jack-up vessel installation model.

NEW JERSEY WIND PORT, LOWER ALLOWAYS CREEK, NJ. Project director for the planning and detailed design of a 168 acre OSW port site that will contain WTG marshalling, foundation laydown areas, and component manufacturing facilities. When constructed this will be the largest OSW port in North America. The site is currently a green field that will be transformed to an OSW port hub facility with allowable live load capacities up to 6,000 psf. This work includes 168 acre civil uplands project, over 3500 LF of pile supported wharf and dredge design of a 4,500-foot-long by 500-foot-wide deep-water access channel.

PORT OF ESBJERG, OFFSHORE WIND PORT DYNAMIC SIMULATION MODEL, ESBJERG, DENMARK.

Project director for the OSW port planning and dynamic simulation model of the combined 380-acre OSW marshaling and manufacturing terminals at the Port of Esbjerg. The model offers both visual and report-based analysis of the terminal, identifying key performance indicators, such as berth utilization, that contribute to future terminal planning. The model runs using the Moffatt & Nichol proprietary software FlexTerm. The digital twin modeling was able to triple OSW throughput, from 1.5 GW to 4.5 GW per year, by optimizing terminal operations and logistics.

PORTSMOUTH MARINE TERMINAL, OFFSHORE WIND TERMINAL, PORTSMOUTH, VA. Project director for a feasibility study and detailed design of the Dominion OSW marine Terminal. This site contains both an OSW component and an OSW foundation marshalling yard. It will also serve as the home port for the first US flagged, Jones Act compliant jack-up, wind turbine installation vessel. Various layouts and associated cost estimates were created in order to evaluate the most efficient layout that met the needs of the client. The terminal will repurpose an existing container terminal and associated uplands.

Joshua leads Moffatt & Nichol’s OSW
efforts around the world as an expert
in the planning, design, and delivery of
all types of OSW facilities. He currently
acts in a wide variety of roles on our
projects, whether leading or consulting
on our projects on all three US coasts
and in Europe. Based on this work he
has an industry leading understanding
of the required OSW port criteria
and how to implement efficient and
cost-effective retrofit or new design
installations. He also runs the Moffatt &
Nichol OSW port dynamic simulation /
digital twinning operations. We use our
proprietary software FlexTerm to model
and optimize the layouts and logistics
of OSW ports. Clients include OSW
developers, OSW component OEMs,
Port Authorities, private land owners
and private equity infrastructure funds.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 24 / 9

EDUCATION
» BS, Civil Engineering, 2002
» BS, Marine Biology, 1993

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Engineer: MA
» Association of Diving Contractors
International

JOSHUA SINGER, PE
513
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 21
P242864

JOSHUA SINGER, PE (CONTINUED)

FORTH PORTS OFFSHORE WIND PORT DYNAMIC SIMULATION MODEL, UK. Project director the dynamic simulation model of the 18 ha OSW marshalling terminal at the Port. The assessment assessed the feasibility of the terminal configuration, logistics, and operations to support future OSW activities, focusing on monopile foundation marshalling operations.

The model offers both visual and report-based analysis of the terminal, identifying key performance indicators, such as berth utilization and key milestones of the project. The model identified a potential risk within the vessel schedule provided by the expected end uses of the terminal and Moffatt & Nichol provided possible solutions to help mitigate the significant impact that a delay on vessel arrivals would have in the project schedule.

PORT OF ARDERSIER OFFSHORE WIND PORT DYNAMIC SIMULATION MODEL, UK. Project director for the dynamic simulation
modeling of a commercial scale OSW project constructed
through Ardersier Port. The port planning and modeling
exercise optimized terminal logistics which allowed for import and loadout of both foundation elements and WTG
components in a single port. The model confirmed the port of Ardersier would be suitable to execute a 1.2 GW OSW project.

The dynamic simulations allowed the optimization of berth utilization through different iterations of vessel allocations.

The model offered both visual and report-based analysis of the terminal, identifying key performance indicators, such as key milestones, vessel queuing patterns, uplands storage requirements and berth utilization throughout the project.

OFFSHORE WIND O&M MARINE TERMINAL, ATLANTIC CITY, NJ. Project director for an OSW operations and maintenance terminal located in Atlantic City. Lead for development of design basis document. The terminal provides berthing for six SES and CTV vessels, along with shore power, fueling, potable water, and sewage pump out for the vessels. Design elements include a sheet pile bulkhead, floating dock finger piers, dredge design, crane design and performance specification, fenders, bollards, guide piles, paving and grading. In addition, the project required close collaboration with the permitting team to identify and mitigate permitting risks and to help progress the project through the permitting process.

OFFSHORE WIND PORT FEASIBILITY STUDY, SEARSPORT, ME. Project director for a site and infrastructure assessment, layout, and preliminary concept design of multiple sites to serve as wind turbine generator (WTG) marshalling and/or fabrication sites for both fixed and floating foundation OSW turbines for the Maine Department of Transportation. The study examined
existing sites and provided cost estimates, construction schedules, and conceptual layouts to retrofit/build-out selected facilities to serve as large-scale OSW support marine terminals. Conducted an economic analysis of the selected sites. This model uses potential revenue streams, based on the selected terminal type (WTG or fabrication site) and required capital expenditures from the cost estimating task, to
generate a return on investment. Moffatt & Nichol executed this model for each of the study sites.

DETAILED DESIGN OF HEAVY LIFT CAPABLE WHARF TO SERVICE 80-

ACRE OFFSHORE WIND MARINE TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT, ALBANY, NY. Project director for detailed design of approximately 1,500 LF of heavy lift inbound and loadout wharf structure capable of supporting up to 6,000 psf to service OSW OEM and manufacturing tenants. Moffatt & Nichol represented the client in talks with OSW component OEMs and developers to establish the required criteria for the heavy lift wharf. Moffatt & Nichol is now in the process of performing the design of the heavy lift wharf. The design will optimize the space to facilitate large component delivery and loadout amongst multiple lease holders. This design includes, geotechnical, structural, civil, and dredge components.

FEASIBILITY STUDY, CONCEPT AND DETAILED DESIGN OF PORT OF

LAKE CHARLES OFFSHORE WIND MARSHALLING PORT LAKE CHARLES, LA. Project director for site assessment, layout, and concept design and detailed design of 60-acre OSW marshalling
port to support OSW in the Gulf of Mexico. This terminal will support the import, staging and loadout of 20 MW + WTG
components. The feasibility study compared three options for development and selected the most cost and schedule efficient design. The terminal will provide 6000 psf heavy lift capabilities at the berths and upland improvement design to support 3,000 psf loading. The design also incorporated the flexibility to utilize the terminal for both liquid and dry bulk between OSW projects.

OFFSHORE WIND OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE FACILITY, PORT
JEFFERSON, NY. Project director for feasibility study to assess site for use as a home port for OSW Service Operations Vessel.

These vessels are typically +/- 300 feet LOA and are used to provide work platforms and accommodations for extended
offshore repair scopes. This study provided multiple layouts and associated cost estimates to convert the site to suit the SOV requirements.

OFFSHORE WIND OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY. Project director for a feasibility study to assess a site for use as a homeport for OSW service operations vessels (SOV) at Port Jefferson. These vessels are typically +/- 300 feet length overall and are used to provide work platforms and accommodations for extended offshore repair scopes.

This study for Sunrise Wind LLC provided multiple layouts and associated cost estimates to convert the site to suit the SOV requirements.
514
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 22
P242864

DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER, OSW PORTS AND SUPPLY CHAIN SPECIALIST

PORT OF LONG BEACH OFFSHORE WIND TERMINAL AT PIER
W, LONG BEACH, CA. Mechanical associate for the layout
design and development of a more than 300-acre
new landfill terminal site to support the OSW industry
and floating OSW plant developments on the West
Coast. Assisting in tasks including environmental permitting, terminal layout, wet storage development, floating wind turbine and component installation operations and pre-commissioning procedures, and vessel needs. Also supporting the Federal Aviation Administration permitting process, providing detailed information on wind turbine and installation equipment characteristics, dimensions, and operational features.

HAWAI'I FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND REGIONAL PORTS ASSESSMENT, HI. Mechanical associate on a contract with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to identify and assess potential Hawai'ian port sites for support of the OSW industry and floating OSW developments. Assisting in analyzing regional port infrastructure for potential as purpose-built OSW ports, examining port characteristics, metocean data, deployment scenarios and throughput analysis, and the final report development.

NORTHWEST SEAPORT ALLIANCE (NWSA) ANALYSIS OF OFFSHORE WIND SUPPLY CHAIN OPPORTUNITIES, TACOMA, WA. Assistant project manager on a contract with the NWSA to evaluate port infrastructure needs and capabilities, providing a preliminary roadmap for opportunities to support the OSW industry and floating OSW plant developments on the West Coast. The analysis covers identifying regional challenges for the gateway and coast and informing NWSA for future strategic actions to engage in business opportunities in OSW. As the assistant manager, responsible in conducting and assisting with data collection and memorandum preparation, OSW industry engagement, port properties, and funding assessment, estimating costs and timelines for port improvements, and developing the final report.

MANUFACTURING FACILITY ENERGY ASSESSMENT, SOMERSWORTH, NW. Project manager and lead for an energy assessment performance at a commercial manufacturing facility. As the project lead, initiated the facility audit, conducted the current energy consumption estimations, task and deliverable management between project and safety engineers, and final implementation report development for six system modification/replacement recommendations that are projected to bring $1,275,202, (40% of facility energy costs for the past year) in annual savings with an estimated implementation cost of more than $6 million. The system improvements and replacement recommendations focused on Solar photovoltaic (PV) Array and Combined Heat and Power System installations, Heat Recovery Systems for Compressors and Exhaust Systems, and variable frequency drive (VFD) implementations for pumps.

WATER TREATMENT (WTP) AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS (WWTP) ENERGY ASSESSMENTS, MASSACHUSETTS AND NEW HAMPSHIRE. Project lead, project engineer, and safety for energy assessment performances to municipal WTP and WWTP facilities in New England. Facility energy audits were conducted on seven different facilities and eighteen energy savings recommendations and system implementation analyses were developed, which are projected to bring over $2,000,000 (over 30% of facilities’ energy costs for the past year) in annual savings
Cengizhan is a mechanical associate
with project experience in the planning,
development, and operation of OSW
ports. His academic studies were
focused on wind energy technology
and OSW, and he has a wealth of
knowledge from his research in stateof-the-art floating OSW technology and simulation of commercial scale floating
OSW farm installation operations. He
has successfully led eight energy audits
at the Industrial Assessment Center,
Department of Energy, achieving major
energy and cost reductions for facilities
around the New England region.

Cengiz is skilled in computer-aided
engineering, OSW logistics, metocean
data analysis, simulation development,
and project management.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 4 / 1

EDUCATION
» MS, Mechanical Engineering/
Offshore Wind Energy, 2024
» BS, Mechanical Engineering, 2020

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Engineer in Training (Mechanical):

CA
» Industrial Assessment Center
Energy Auditor, US Department of
Energy
» Wind Energy Technologies,
Technical University of Denmark
» Computer-Aided Design and
Manufacturing Technician,
MOSTEM

CENGIZHAN CENGIZ, EIT
515
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 23
P242864

OSW PORT INFRASTRUCTURE, AGENC Y ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY

NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY, WEST COAST

PORTS OFFSHORE WIND STRATEGY STUDY, VARIOUS STATES,
WEST COAST. Deputy project manager and port
infrastructure expert to assess ports along the west
coast within Washington, Oregon, and California to
support the OSW industry. This assessment included determining how each port could support the OSW industry and provided rough order of magnitude cost estimate and schedules for port infrastructure improvements.

CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION, ASSEMBLY BILL 525 WATERFRONT FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR OFFSHORE WIND, STATEWIDE. Project manager for the port and workforce plan to improve waterfront port facilities to support floating OSW activities for the State of California. This study evaluated California port sites and developed a feasible and representative multi-port execution and logistic plan for the inbound transportation of materials, staging/assembly, integration and commissioning of key components, and offshore installation. Included a detailed assessment of the necessary investments required in California ports, analyzing workforce development needs, and recommendations for workforce standards and training required to support OSW development in California.

BOEM, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, OFFSHORE WIND INFRASTRUCTURE STUDY. Deputy project manager for a study of the existing infrastructure to determine required infrastructure improvements to support the OSW industry. The study includes a site screening evaluation to identify preferred sites, engagement with industry to determine infrastructure requirements for floating OSW developers, gap analysis to determine the required infrastructure improvements, conceptual design of proposed improvements, and cost estimating of the preferred options. Additional task orders under this contract:
» Port of Coos Bay Offshore Wind Infrastructure Study. Deputy project manager for a study of the existing infrastructure at the Port of Coos Bay to identify required infrastructure improvements to support the OSW industry. The study includes a site screening evaluation to identify preferred sites, engagement with industry to determine infrastructure requirements for floating OSW developers, gap analysis to determine the required infrastructure improvements, conceptual design of proposed improvements, and cost estimating. » California Floating Offshore Wind Regional Ports Assessment. Deputy project manager for a study to determine the capacity of 14 existing California Ports to support OSW development. The study evaluates the ability for existing CA ports to meet or exceed the deployment targets set by California Assembly Bill 525. In addition to OSW, the study evaluates synergies by using OSW port terminals for oil and gas decommissioning activities.
» California Floating Offshore Wind Regional Ports Feasibility Analysis. Project manager for a feasibility analysis including cost estimates and project schedules of the necessary improvements required of California ports to support the OSW industry. This study builds upon the Task Order 2 study.

PORT OF LONG BEACH, PIER WIND CONCEPT PHASE, LONG BEACH, CA. Deputy project manager for the concept phase of a new 400-acre terminal to support OSW development. This study included preliminary engineering to outline the major project components and provide a concept report that included drawings, a cost estimate, and schedule.

Jennifer is Moffatt & Nichol's west coast
team lead for OSW projects. She brings
experience across the country on OSW
projects, including studies such as this
one, as well as a background structural
design and assists on a variety of
projects with emphasis on bridges and
marine structures, including floating
structures, waterfront earth retaining
structures, piers, and wharf structures.

She is experienced in floating OSW
terminals and has authored numerous
assessment reports documenting port
assessments of existing ports and
greenfield sites. Jennifer works closely
with clients and multidisciplinary
teams to develop feasibility studies,
construction drawings, specifications,
cost estimates, structural calculation
packages, and provide construction
support.

She has performed field inspections
of waterfront structures and authored
assessment reports documenting
structural condition. Her experience
includes coordinating with clients
and different disciplines, developing
construction drawings, specifications,
cost estimates, structural calculation
packages, and providing construction
support. Jennifer also uses various
structural analysis and design programs
such as SAP2000 and SupportIT to
provide location specific environmental
loading analysis prevalent to waterfront
structures.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 11 / 9

EDUCATION
» MS, Structural Engineering, 2016
» BS, Structural Engineering, 2014

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Engineer: CA (Civil
#C90232)

JENNIFER LIM, PE
516
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 24
P242864

JENNIFER LIM, PE (CONTINUED)

CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION, CALIFORNIA ALTERNATIVE

PORTS ASSESSMENT FOR OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT, STATEWIDE, CA. Deputy project manager and port infrastructure expert for a study to evaluate greenfield port sites within California to support the OSW industry.

BERTHS 55-59 WHARF UPGRADES, PORT OF OAKLAND, CA. Assistant project manager and task lead for a project to upgrade
existing container wharf facilities to accommodate mooring and berthing of ultra-large container vessels (ULCVs) of 24,000 TEU capacity for the Port of Oakland. The project includes design of fender and bollard upgrades and concrete repairs.

UNDERWATER BULKHEAD REPAIR, LOS ANGELES, CA. Assistant
project manager and construction management lead for an underwater bulkhead repair that consisted of installing tieback anchors for the Port of Los Angeles. As the construction management lead, oversaw construction and managed the
team to meet all milestones and provide a smooth turnover of the property back to the Port.

MASTER PLANNING, PORT OF HUENEME, CA. Project engineer for the Port of Hueneme outreach to assess current operational limitations and determine priority maintenance projects.

Project included updating the Port’s Strategy Plan, outreach to stakeholders, and future planning.

OCEAN BOULEVARD COASTAL BIKE TRAIL CONNECTOR, LONG BEACH, CA.

Assistant project manager for the design of a Class I multiuse path that includes the design and construction of a new bridge and surficial improvements to existing infrastructure.

This $1.3 million project provides a much-needed connection between the Mark Bixby Bicycle Path on the iconic Gerald Desmond Replacement Bridge and the Los Angeles Bike
Path and Downtown Long Beach. Responsibilities include
coordination with six subconsultants, preparing invoices, making certain deliverables meet the project schedule, and coordination with the client – the Port of Long Beach.

ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS, CTO 0609-CIPC-02 HUNTINGTON BEACH CHANNEL STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA.

Structural engineer-in-training responsible for the structural analysis to assess the condition of 3.1 miles of existing sheet pile wall and the production of the structural assessment report. This project included an inspection of the existing sheet pile, proposing repair options, and providing cost estimates.

CENTERM EXPANSION, VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA. Engineer-intraining who provided cost estimates and design quantities for the expansion of the Centerm Container Terminal to
increase container throughput from 0.9 TEUs to 1.5m TEUs.

EL DORADO SEAWALL, LOS CABOS, MEXICO. Assistant engineer for the development of a cast-in-drilled-hole seawall system utilized for coastal protection in a region subject to hurricane hazards. Services include providing conceptual design
alternatives, engineering calculations, design drawings, and construction support. The structure was analyzed for wave and seismic conditions utilizing an analytical program for earth retaining structures.

SEAPORT REDEVELOPMENT, PORT OF SAN DIEGO, CA. Project
engineer for the conceptual alternative layouts and
conceptual engineering design of the Port of San Diego
Master Plan Update for the Seaport San Diego development.

Project includes coordination with multidisciplinary teams for the design of floating facilities, fixed piers, shoreline stabilization, and utilities.

REDONDO BEACH SPORT FISHING PIER DESIGN AND PERMITTING, REDONDO BEACH, CA. Assistant project manager for the
replacement of the King Harbor Sport Fishing Pier for the City of Redondo Beach. Along with designing the Pier,
this project includes public outreach efforts to determine the community’s desired pier features, grant assistance, environmental permitting, and construction support.

FOUR SEASONS NEVIS COASTAL PROTECTION, NEVIS, ST. Kitts & Nevis.

Engineer-in-training responsible for the analysis and design of a pier extension with a steel sheet pile breakwater. In addition to allowing more boats to load and unload passengers, the pier system serves as beach protection from hurricanes. Tasks included the complete design of structural components,
development of a calculation package, and providing
construction support services. The project was challenged to adhere to a tight schedule driven by the upcoming hurricane season.

KINDER MORGAN PHOENIX RICHMOND 2019 MOTEMS, RICHMOND,
CA. The scope of this project (9312-10) is to provide support services for miscellaneous MOTEMS related efforts. The
project objectives were to provide these miscellaneous
MOTEMS services limited to consulting services for evaluation, design, or regulator response.

N-S GREENWAY GAP CLOSURE PROJECT, LARKSPUR, CA. Engineer-intraining who produced Caltrans cost estimates and design quantities for the addition of a pedestrian bridge that will provide a Class I multi-use path and sidewalk in Marin County.

In addition, Ms. Lim was responsible for the design and coordination of the stairway and connection
517
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 25
P242864

OSW MOORING AND NAVIGATION SPECIALIST

HUMBOLDT BAY OFFSHORE WIND HEAVY LIFT MARINE
TERMINAL, SAMOA, CA. Engineer for the design and
development of a 40+ acre terminal to support the
OSW industry along the West Coast and beyond.

Responsibilities include assisting in the harbor and
wet-storage layout, selection of anchoring technologies, mooring analysis and supporting vessel navigation studies.

PIER 35 BOLLARD ASSESSMENT, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Project manager and engineer in charge of evaluating the pier’s deck and bollards following a failure of several bollards and mooring lines. Performed an above water inspection of the pier and bollards, and a high-level analysis of the conditions that contributed to the event. Provided recommendations to the client regarding use of the pier for future vessel calls.

MOORING DESIGN AND ANALYSIS FOR A NEW BULK LIQUID TERMINAL, VILA DO CONDE, BRAZIL.

Naval Architect in charge of design and analysis of a multi-buoy mooring system for a set of oil transport barges. Developed a numerical model of the barges and mooring system in Orcaflex, and designed a mooring system to withstand extreme metocean conditions at the site.

ATLAS WIND, EQUINOR, CA. As project engineer on Equinor’s Atlas Wind team, supported the team on a variety of technical topics to develop and de-risk the Atlas OSW farm project. This included developing concepts, cost estimates, and project design envelopes to support internal design and selection of fit-for-purpose solutions for the project, with emphasis on:
» The development of the floating foundation and mooring system concepts.

As part of this work, responsible for technical guidance and evaluation of engineering studies performed by EPC contractors to develop floating platform and mooring concepts for a 2 GW farm. Proposed solutions were evaluated for technical feasibility, cost, schedule, and ability to fabricate. » The development of strategies for fabrication, logistics, and assembly of complete floaters or floater sub-assemblies, from the fabrication site to the point where units are ready for tow-out locally in California. » The development of offshore installation vessel specifications and guidance on installation durations for mooring system prelay and platform tow-out.

The development of port infrastructure requirements and evaluation of port facilities for platform assembly, staging and integration, and operations and maintenance.

PRINCIPLE POWER, PORTUGAL & CALIFORNIA. As naval architect and mooring engineer, acted as project lead for multiple OSW farm projects, from concept design stages to final installation offshore. Responsible for numerous designs of floating offshore platforms and their mooring for deepwater sites on the U.S. coasts and for shallowwater sites around Europe and Asia. Managed the technical interface between clients and a cross-functional team of engineers, reviewed project deliverables, organized design reviews, and presented engineering recommendations to clients.

Provided mooring hardware procurement support on a contract totaling 25 MM USD. This involved developing component specifications and evaluating supplier bids to provide recommendations to the client, performing due-diligence and approving supplier documentation, and acting as owner representative in the interface with suppliers and classification societies.

Dorian is a naval architect and coastal
engineer who specializes in design,
analysis, and installation of floating
offshore structures and their mooring
systems. He has broad experience in
the floating OSW sector, where he
has worked on some of the world’s
largest floating wind farms to date. This
includes the identification of project
drivers, initial sizing of floating units
and moorings, numerical modeling
and dynamic analysis in extreme and
fatigue conditions. He has also acted
as client representative and technical
advisor during the construction phases
of floating wind farm projects, with
responsibilities including port selection
for turbine-platform integration works;
mooring hardware procurement;
and oversight of offshore installation
campaigns for mooring systems, subsea
electric cables, and platform hook-up.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 10 / 1

EDUCATION
» PhD, Naval Architecture and Marine
Engineering, 2018
» MS, Naval Architecture and Marine
Engineering, 2015
» BS, Naval Architecture and Marine
Engineering, 2014

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Engineer: WA
(Naval Architecture and Marine
Engineering)

DORIAN BREFORT, PHD, PE
518
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 26
P242864

EMISSIONS REDUCTION STRATEGY LEAD

REDWOOD MARINE HEAVY LIFT OFFSHORE WIND TERMINAL
AND BAYWIDE MASTER PLAN, SAMOA, CA. Responsible
for conducting a green terminal assessment for this
Humboldt Bay Harbor District project. The Humboldt
Bay Harbor District is redeveloping 180 acres of
existing land within the harbor area to become the new site for the Redwood Marine Heavy Lift OSW Terminal, which will facilitate the assembly of floating OSW turbines to meet the State of California’s goal of 25 gigawatts of OSW energy by 2045. Moffatt & Nichol is performing the detailed design and onsite habitat restoration, as well as providing support to the environmental subconsultant developing the environmental impact report and permits.

NEW YORK STATE CANALS RECREATIONWAY PLAN 2050, A VISION FOR NEW YORK STATE’S CANALS AND CANALWAY TRAILS, NEW YORK. As part of a consulting engineering/planning team for this New York Power Authority project, responsible for conceptualizing a strategic vision for integrating electric and hybrid-electric propulsion systems across the New York State Canal Corporation’s maintenance fleet. Focused on identifying pilot opportunities for work boats, tenders, dredges, and tugboats. Developed recommendations to align sustainable vessel modernization with operational needs and financial priorities. Provided industry insights to support future initiatives aimed at enhancing sustainability and efficiency in canal operations.

JUST-IN-TIME (JIT) ARRIVAL EMISSIONS REDUCTION POTENTIAL IN GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING, SPAIN. Environmental, social, and governance and compliance officer for a study commissioned by the International Maritime Organization Global Industry Alliance. Utilized automatic identification system data to evaluate the impact of JIT operations on container ships globally. Quantified benefits, highlighting JIT’s role in promoting more efficient and environmentally friendly maritime operations.

Findings supported the case for broader adoption of JIT practices in the container shipping industry.

MASTER PLAN FOR ONSHORE POWER SUPPLY (OPS) IN SPANISH PORTS AND EVALUATION STUDY OF SHIP ELECTRIC SUPPLY IMPLEMENTATION IN THE SPANISH PORT SYSTEM, SPAIN. Strategic partnership manager for an infrastructure and planning project for docks and ships for OPS in the Spanish port ecosystem. Led collaborative work on impact assessment and communication strategy, conducted an environmental and health impact assessment, designed and developed prototype handling equipment, researched electric grid benefits, and provided a regulatory assessment.

TOWARDS A SHARED EUROPEAN LOGISTICS INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SPACE, SPAIN. Strategic partnership manager for a platform for pan-European logistics applications. Coled Living Lab 7 on cross-border movement of goods; co-led work on anomaly detection and risk assessment and digital community nodes built to facilitate the next generation of collaborative, responsive, and agile green transportation chains.

A lightweight information and communication technology structure enables information sharing for collaborative sustainable logistics.

PHASE B DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, ALGECIRAS, SPAIN. Responsible for detailing of scope, business case, design criteria, and decarbonization strategies for this Total Terminal International Algeciras, S.A.U. project.

Miluše is a recognized expert in
sustainability strategy, decarbonization,
and environmental economics
with extensive experience in port
and maritime sector emissions
management. She specializes in
emissions reduction planning,
stakeholder engagement, and
sustainability-driven business
strategies. She has worked extensively
with international organizations,
regulatory agencies, and port
authorities to drive sustainability
initiatives, emissions inventory
studies, and compliance frameworks.

Her expertise includes project
management, policy development, and
data-driven solutions for sustainable
port operations. As a senior consultant
with Moffatt & Nichol, Miluše is
working on assisting primarily with
business growth strategies, economics,
sustainability, and decarbonization in
the development of port digital twin
and related services.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 15 / 1

EDUCATION
» PhD, Environmental Economics,
2015
» MA, Communication for
Development, 2021
» MSc, Sustainable Development and
Planning, 2009

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Container Terminal Management,
London Port Academy
» Environmental Social Governance,
The Corporate Governance Institute
» Managing Sanctions Risk,
International Compliance
Association
MILUŠE TICHAVSKA, PHD
519
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 27
P242864

MARINE STRUCTURES LEAD
CHEVRON LONG WHARF MOTEMS SUPPORT, RICHMOND, CA.

The scope of this project is to complete an internal
inspection of the Chevron Richmond Deepwater
Outfall Pipeline (DWOP) to allow Chevron to
maintain the DWOP lease with California State Lands
Commission (CSLC) allowing the Chevron Richmond Refinery to continue disposing of treated process water into the San Francisco Bay. The project objectives were to complete the DWOP internal inspection, review results of inspection to verify DWOP condition is acceptable, prepare a report of findings, and submit to CSLC confirming the condition of the DWOP is acceptable to continue operations. We led the project team, managed subconsultants, and provided oversight of the inspection.

CAPE WIND OFFSHORE WIND FARM, NEW BEDFORD, MA. Senior structural engineer involved in this Cianbro Constructors project for this large-scale, design-build, clean energy infrastructure project located 6 miles offshore. The design includes the use of new standards for the development of offshore structures.

GOLDEN GATE FERRY TERMINAL IMPROVEMENTS, SAN FRANCISCO BAY, CA. Structural engineer for modification to the three Golden Gate ferry terminals to accommodate Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines. The modifications require the replacement of the existing ferry vessel access facilities. The project has involved developing terminal alternatives, including costs and environmental issues associated with each alternative. The project is currently in the environmental documentation phase which includes preliminary engineering. The project includes detailed design and construction support services.

OCEAN BEACH 65 PERCENT DESIGN AND SOUTH OCEAN BEACH 95% DESIGN DOCUMENTS, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Senior structural engineer whose responsibilities included structural analysis for piles, pile cap, tiebacks, and SWOO crossing; technical specifications, design drawings, and environmental support on this San Francisco Public Utilities Commission project.

PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO PIER 52 BOAT LAUNCH INSPECTION AND EVALUATION, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Senior structural engineer whose responsibilities included data and document review, review of design criteria, field investigation, memorandum of inspection, and wheel detail and refinement of sketches on this Port of San Francisco project.

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVFAC) HAWAII REPAIR WHARF S369 BULKHEAD, FORD ISLAND, PEARL HARBOR, HI. Senior structural engineer on this Watts-Healy Tibbits Joint Venture project for NAVFAC Hawaii. This project repaired the wharf bulkhead to stabilize the area behind the bulkhead as well as made improvements to provide a safe area for facility users. A new sheet-pile bulkhead will be added behind the existing wharf to prevent the undermining of soil behind the existing bulkhead.

BROOKLYN BASIN PRELIMINARY DESIGN, OAKLAND, CA. Senior structural engineer for this Signature Development Group project. Project involved permit support, basis of design, wharf structural analysis and type selection, preliminary design, marina study, and cost estimate for shoreline structure, wharf retrofit, and marina.

POINT ORIENT WHARF DREDGE LINE SUPPORT, RICHMOND, CA. Senior structural engineer involved in this evaluation of the Point Orient Wharf to support dredging lines on this Chevron Products Company project.

Jim has more than 45 years of structural
experience focused primarily of port
, which includes wharves and piers,
ferry terminals, bridges, and offshore
structures. He has also performed
waterfront structure’s inspection
to evaluate structural adequacy for
requirements of the California State
Lands MOTEMS policy. He has lead and
supervised engineers in design and
analysis for various types of structures
including loading arms for wharves,
fixed and floating structures, ferry
terminals, off-loading facilities, railroad
structures, and seismic retrofit for
bridges.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 48 / 26

EDUCATION
» MS, Structural Engineering, 1977
» BS, Civil Engineering, 1975

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Engineer: CA (Civil
#30246, Structural, #3652), Guam
(Civil and Structural)

JAMES BRADY, PE
520
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 28
P242864

COST ESTIMATING, SCHEDULING

BOEM CALIFORNIA FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND REGIONAL
PORTS FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS, CALIFORNIA. Cost estimator
for various facility upgrades for ten different port sites along the California coast. Different port facilities
were reviewed for staging and integration sites,
manufacturing sites, operations and maintenance sites, and construction support sites. Costs were developed for a range of activities including breakwater upgrades, wharf and pier upgrades, dredging, backlands and building support upgrades, and general drainage and electrical site upgrades. The basis of costs to develop the new port facilities were included as part of the final report to BOEM.

HUMBOLDT OFFSHORE WIND AND HEAVY LIFT TERMINAL, EUREKA, CA. Lead quality control reviewer for the cost estimate and construction schedule for the Humboldt OSW and Heavy Lift Terminal. The project consisted of the full-build layout with a new heavy lift wharf, mooring structure for semi-submersible floating foundations, mooring dolphins, catwalks, dredging, rock slope revetments, heavy lift upland areas for component storage and assembly, stormwater, site water, and electrical system upgrades, and roadway improvements. Review and updates to the cost estimate and schedule were provided for submittal to the client to be used as part of the environmental review process for the proposed project.

ALCATRAZ FIXED WHARF STRUCTURAL REPAIR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Lead Cost Estimator/ Scheduler. The Alcatraz Fixed Wharf is a recognized historic structure, heavily utilized as a ferry terminal, providing the only access for visitors and staff to Alcatraz Island. Moffatt & Nichol has been retained to evaluate the structural capacity of the wharf and to develop a repair design for the deteriorated concrete structure (beams, slabs, and piles).

A concurrent seismic safety improvement project is being designed to address structural deficiencies in the wharf. At each design submittal a cost estimate and construction schedule were provided, using the NPS cost estimating format and requirements.

MOTCO REPLACE/UPGRADE PIER 2 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA. Task leader for the construction cost estimate and schedule for replacement of Pier 2 including landside facilities.

The design involves demolition and removal of the existing timber pier and construction of a new reinforced concrete pier that will have two container cranes for handling containerized ammunition. Design also includes new approach trestle and strengthening of an existing approach trestle. A new electrical substation for power to the new container cranes and new utility services (storm drainage, firewater, potable water, and sewer) were also included in the design. The engineer's estimate was within 3% of the low bid contractor.

VOPAK TERMINAL LOS ANGELES BERTHS 187-190 MOTEMS COMPLIANCE UPGRADE, LOS ANGELES, CA. Lead cost estimator/scheduler for the design of a seismic upgrade to an existing marine oil terminal within the Port of Los Angeles to comply with the Marine Oil Terminals Engineering and Maintenance (MOTEMS). Design included structural retrofits of existing concrete wharf, structural repairs to concrete piles, slope stabilization, new mooring and fendering equipment, ground improvements including cement deep soil mixing (CDSM) and jet grouting, civil demolition, electrical upgrades, piping upgrades, and paving. Lead the cost estimating and schedule development for the design including the Basis of Estimate Report and downtime calculations during construction due to berth occupancy. Attended weekly client meetings with the owner representing the cost estimate deliverables.

Jack has more than 35 years of
diverse project management and
civil engineering experience with
emphasis on marine construction and
dredging. As a former project manager/
cost estimator for a major marine
construction, dredging, and heavy
civil construction contractors, Jack
possesses a comprehensive background
in hard dollar cost estimating, as well
as development and management
of project schedules, constructability
analysis, QC/QA, and project
engineering. Primary responsibilities on
heavy civil construction and dredging
projects have included project
coordination with owners, engineers,
and public agencies, change orders
preparation/negotiation, subcontract
administration, construction
schedules, project submittals, testing
requirements, and daily/monthly report
preparation.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 39 / 25

EDUCATION
» BS, Civil Engineering, 1985

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Engineer: CA (Civil,
#60931)

JACK FINK, PE
521
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 29
P242864

COST ESTIMATING, SCHEDULING

OSW OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE TERMINAL DETAILED
DESIGN, ATLANTIC CITY, NJ. Performed QA/QC review for
cost estimates for this project for the detailed design of the marine infrastructure, dredge design, assistance during the bidding process and follow-on field services for an operations and maintenance to serve the OSW industry.

ROBERTS BANK TERMINAL 2 MARINE CONTAINER TERMINAL, VANCOUVER, BC. Lead cost estimator for the planning and design of the construction of a new three-berth marine container terminal in Delta, B.C. The terminal is located in deep subtidal waters to minimize environmental effects. The $3 billion project involves dredging, rock import and placement, caissons, concrete deck, crane rails, backlands paving, access roads and utilities.

PORTSMOUTH MARINE TERMINAL, PORTSMOUTH, VA. Performed QA/QC review for cost estimates for this project that involves converting an existing marshalling port to serve OSW markets. This facility will import, stage, pre-assemble, and loadout turbine, tower, and blade components for large commercial OSW installations. The 75-acre terminal will require significant retrofits and upgrades to the existing marine infrastructure.

ALCATRAZ WHARF RENOVATION AND SEISMIC STRENGTHENING, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Lead cost estimator for engineering of the repair and strengthening of the historic Wharf on Alcatraz Island, managed by the National Park Service. The Wharf serves as the only egress to and from the Island and the staging point for over half a million visitors a year. Developed a budgetary cost estimate that included the development of repair alternatives and design repairs, including structural concrete repairs and seismic strengthening.

SAN FRANCISCO MARINA SEAWALL, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Lead cost estimator for engineering of the repair and strengthening of the seawall structures starting at the east end of the St. Francis Yacht Club seawall on the Bay, around the peninsula, through the East Marina, along Marina Green, and through Gashouse Cove Terminating at the Fort Mason Entrance. Developed cost estimates for repair of damaged structures and cost for seismic upgrade. The work included development of tables with quantities and unit costs for repair.

TERMINAL 5 BERTH MODERNIZATION DESIGN, SEATTLE, WA. Civil engineer responsible for the concept designs, estimated cost, and schedule to modernize Terminal 5 in the Port of Seattle. The project is to accommodate larger vessels, requiring berth, and dock facilities to be rehabilitated to support larger and heavier dock equipment, as well as the anticipated impacts on operations.

TREASURE ISLAND REDEVELOPMENT, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Lead cost estimator for the engineering design for shoreline protection for Phase 1 of the redevelopment project. One of the key work items was assessing the effects of future climate change/sea level rise and developing a management and an adaptation strategy to address future changes in water levels and storm intensity.

Jerry is a civil engineer with experience
on major heavy civil construction and
engineering projects both domestic
and international. Prior to joining
Moffatt & Nichol, Jerry was employed
by large national/international civil
and marine construction companies
wherein he served in the capacities of
project engineer, project manager, and
chief estimator. He has participated
in or managed numerous projects
involving port dredging, dams and
levees, airports, power plants, and mine
construction.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 49 / 11

ANTICIPATED TIME COMMITMENT
» 25%

EDUCATION
» MBA, Strategic Management, 2001
» BS, Civil Engineering, 1976

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Engineer: ID (Civil)

JERRY NEAL, PE
522
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 30
P242864

PORT INSPECTION LEAD

PORT OF RICHMOND POINT POTRERO MARINE TERMINAL
CONDITION ASSESSMENT, RICHMOND, CA. Engineer
supporting a portwide inspection and condition
assessment of existing infrastructure at the Point
Potrero Marine Terminal, including Berths 5-6 (lay
berth), Berths 7-8 (auto terminal), Graving Basins, and Finger Piers. The focus of this work is to provide a baseline condition of existing infrastructure, identify projects to improve safety and security, and develop a long-term plan for infrastructure improvements to expand port operations and revenue. As project engineer, performed above-water inspections of the graving basin and pier structures.

Subsequent work has included developing a condition assessment report of the structures, providing recommendations regarding potential projects in support of Port operations, and project coordination between project team and client (Port of Richmond), including presenting assessment findings to Richmond's City Council.

PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO PIER 45 WEST APRON REPAIRS, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Engineer for this project at Pier 45, an important asset that houses the Port’s primary commercial seafood processing facility. As project engineer, performed above-water inspections of the apron structure and presented findings in an inspection report. Subsequent work has included developing a conceptual design report which provides repair and replacement options, including cost estimates and construction scheduling considerations, to the client in order to enhance operations at Pier 45.

TREASURE ISLAND FERRY TERMINAL, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. As part of an engineering/ construction consulting team, served as engineer tasked with designing components for a steel canopy and water taxi landing. The design was in support of the new pier structure that connects the new open-air ferry shelter structure. Additionally, reviewed drawings and provided mark-ups in support of the final design.

PIER 3 PILE, EVERETT, WA. As project engineer, supervises the junior engineer’s modeling and analysis calculations in support of seismic and vertical load analyses of the existing structure for Port of Everett. Tasks include summarizing the analysis of findings in a technical memorandum and report presented to the Port.

P-454 MULTI-MISSION DRY DOCK (M2D2), PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD, BREMERTON, WA.

As part of a joint venture team, serves as project engineer for Moffatt & Nichol’s portion to design a CVN-, SSBM-, and SSN-capable dry dock for the U.S. Navy (Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Northwest). Tasks include analyzing and designing the double-wall cofferdam structural components using SAP2000, LPILE, and SupportIT software and preparing the calculation report.

RM17-1006 REPAIR WHARVES W3 AND W1, JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, HI. As part of a joint venture team for this Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Hawaii project, served as project engineer tasked with the seismic analysis and design for reconstructing wharves W3 and W1. The two new wharf structures restore operational efficiency to the berths.

TERMINAL 46 EXISTING WHARF SEISMIC EVALUATION, SEATTLE, WA. Design engineer tasked with performing a seismic analysis on the existing wharf structure at Terminal 46 and summarizing findings in a technical memorandum to the client, Port of Seattle.

This project was completed to help inform the design of new facilities and reuse of existing facilities at the project site as part of the Port’s effort to develop a cruise terminal at Terminal 46.

Damilola is a project engineer who
specializes in the analysis and design
of reinforced, precast, and prestressed
concrete and steel waterfront
structures, including piers, wharves,
and mooring and berthing structures.

She has considerable experience in
seismic analysis and has participated
in bridge load rating analyses and
cost estimations. In addition to her
technical experience, Damilola has used
her technical writing skills to develop
various calculation packages and
reports.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 7 / 6

EDUCATION
» MS, Civil/Environmental
Engineering, 2019
» BS, Civil/Environmental
Engineering, 2018

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Engineer: WA

DAMILOLA TAIWO, PE
523
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 31
P242864

PORT INSPECTION ENGINEER

CHEVRON RLW CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT FOR MOTEMS
REPAIRS, RICHMOND, CA. The scope of this project is to
provide construction support activities for structural
deficiencies which require repair identified in the
Above Water and Below Water MOTEMS Audit
inspection. The project objectives were to review construction submittals, respond to requests for information (RFI), development of design sketches, and attending construction support coordination phone calls and meetings.

PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO PIER 27 FENDER EMERGENCY REPAIRS, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Project manager and lead design engineer of replacement fender structure.

PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO RAPID ASSESSMENTS, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Project manager and inspection lead for Rapid structural inspection and evaluation of POSF infrastructure (Piers and Wharves).

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (NPS), ALCATRAZ WHARF STABILIZATION, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Project manager and lead structural engineer for inspecting the existing wharf structure, designing the structural repairs and seismic upgrades, and providing construction support. The fixed wharf structure was evaluated with nonlinear dynamic (TimeHistory) and nonlinear static (Pushover) analysis. From these analyses a seismic dolphin layout was designed to restrain the existing structure to a displacement below its inelastic displacement capacity.

AVILA PIER INSPECTION, AVILA BEACH, CA. Led inspection, evaluation, and retrofit design of timber ocean pier including the development of priority level of repairs to allow the most critical repairs to proceed as funding is made available.

HARFORD PIER ASSESSMENT, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CA. Structural assessment of timber ocean pier and timber superstructure. Preliminary design of retrofits to both pier and canopy superstructure.

WETA EMERGENCY RESPONSE INSPECTION, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Engineer providing as needed rapid post-event structural inspections of WETA terminal facilities within the Bay Area.

SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT, JOHNSON PIER IMPROVEMENTS, HALF MOON BAY, CA.

Lead structural engineer for the above-water inspection, evaluating the existing structure, designing the pier extensions, and repairing the existing concrete structure.

COLONIAL TERMINALS - DOCK 1 AND 3 MOORING HARDWARE EVALUATION, SAVANNAH, GA.

Designer providing engineering services to evaluate the existing mooring hardware and dolphin structures for Docks 1 and 3. The analysis will determine the maximum capacity mooring bollards that can be mounted to dolphins.

COLONIAL TERMINALS – DOCK 3 HOSE TOWER AND PIPE BRIDGE, SAVANNAH, GA. Designer who provided engineering services for design and construction of a new hose tower and pipe bridge at Colonial's Dock 3, as well as two new bollards installed at Colonial's Berth 20 facility.

CB4-9 BERTH IMPROVEMENTS, GARDEN CITY, GA. Designer providing engineering services for the layout and design of new crane tie-downs and fendering systems.

CASS WHITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, GA. Designer who provided bridge and culvert design for the subject road.

Sean is a structural lead and project
manager with more than 10 years of
experience in structural engineering
and seismic analysis, with a focus in
the maritime industry. His expertise
includes structural analysis/design
of marine structures such as ferry
terminals, marine oil terminals, piers,
and wharves. He has also performed
waterfront structure inspections to
evaluate structural adequacy for
requirements of the California State
Lands MOTEMS policy. Sean has worked
on I&R projects for clients that include
Port of San Francisco, Port of Oakland,
and Golden Gate Bridge Highway and
Transportation District.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH M&N
» 10 / 10

EDUCATION
» MS, Structural Engineering, 2013
» BS, Civil Engineering, 2010
» BS, Construction Management,
2010

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Engineer: California
(Civil, #C88079)

SEAN HART, PE
524
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 32
P242864

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

QUALIFICATIONS / SKILLS
» Keynote speaker at several conferences for Economic and Workforce Research. » Experience developing indicators and metrics that drive policy making and evaluation.
» Considerable strategic planning and policy analysis experience in economic vitality, regional planning, education and workforce development programs and services.
» Extensive internal management experience, directing an office of research analysts, project managers, and new business coordinators. » Considerable research experience with emerging industry clusters (Life Sciences; Information & Communications Technologies; Cyber Security; Defense, Aerospace & Transportation Manufacturing), energy (Solar, Wind and Fossil Fuels) and Healthcare industries.
» Training and extensive applied knowledge in quantitative research techniques. » Experience with qualitative research techniques including moderating focus groups and conducting executive interviews.
» Guest lecturer on survey research and applied research techniques. » Experience training, developing, and managing internal staff and research team. » Extensive quantitative analysis skills – economic modeling, linear and nonlinear regression analyses, and related analytical techniques.

Josh, the president and founder of
BW Research has been leading and
directing applied workforce and
economic research for almost 20 years.

His work builds off complex research
methodologies to gather and analyze
empirical data to reveal the strengths
and weaknesses of different policies
and strategies as well as identifying
new opportunities. The firm’s research
is built around developing data-driven
indicators and metrics that provide
decision makers with evidence-based
conclusions and recommendations.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH BW RESEARCH
» 27 / 19

EDUCATION
» MA, Economics
» BA, International Economics

JOSH WILLIAMS (BW RESEARCH)

BATHYMETRIC SURVEYS
HYDROGRAPHER/PROJECT MANAGER, WOOLPERT (FORMERLY ETRAC), SAN RAFAEL, CA. » Plan, implement and oversee small to large-scale projects. » Collect, process, and generate products for hydrographic data sets. » Manage and maintain small fleet of work vessels.
» Develop and implement new technology in survey operations. » Installation and calibration of precision dredge positioning systems. » Installation and calibration of hydrographic mapping equipment for survey vessels.

Jordan is a Certified Hydrographer
with experience in vessel mobilization
and final data and descriptive report
delivery. He has been involved in all
aspects of hydrographic survey as a
senior hydrographer, data processor
and project manager. Jordan has
managed or supported large- and
small-scale hydrographic projects
throughout the continental US and
beyond.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH WOOLPERT
» 18 / 14

EDUCATION
» MS, Geology, 2007
» BS, Geology, 2000

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» NSPS-THSOA Certified
Hydrographer (#340)

JORDAN KUSHNER, CH (WOOLPERT)
525
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 33
P242864

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND INVESTIGATIONS

PORT OF RICHMOND POINT POTRERO MARINE TERMINAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT, RICHMOND, CA. Project Principal. Leading the geotechnical assessment of the terminal, which included researching historical geotechnical conditions and performing underdeck visual inspections for geotechnical conditions. ENGEO is supporting Moffatt & Nichol for this port-wide inspection and condition assessment of existing infrastructure at PPMT. The focus of this work is to provide a baseline condition of existing infrastructure, identify projects to improve safety and security, and develop a longterm plan for infrastructure improvements to expand port operations and revenue.

PORT OF RICHMOND TERMINAL 4, RICHMOND, CA. Project Principal. Jeff performed the peer review and assisted in explaining the proposed mitigation to BCDC staff.

ENGEO performed a third-party peer review of revetment design associated with the removal of facilities at the Port of Richmond’s Terminal 4 site. During construction, the revetment moved significantly. ENGEO was retained to review documents from design as well as Contractor submittals and construction logs.

ENGEO participated in field observations during test pits into the revetment and provided our opinion on the cause of revetment movement and mitigation.

PORT OF RICHMOND TERMINAL ONE REDEVELOPMENT, RICHMOND, CA. Project Manager. Jeff provided technical oversight of the analyses and the report. The Latitude project is an approximately 13-acre site located at the closed Terminal One of the Port of Richmond. The site was originally used for shipping and transport, warehouse utilities, storage, and other port-related industrial activities. Most buildings and structures have been demolished and removed from the project site; remaining is an approximately 94,000-square-foot port operations warehouse building (the Terminal One Warehouse) that sits partially on a 480-foot-long marginal pier (the Terminal One Pier) constructed in 1915.

BP RICHMOND MOTEMS EVALUATION, RICHMOND, CA. Project Manager. Jeff directed staff performing field exploration, performed foundation and stability analyses and wrote the geotechnical report. Included in the requirements of MOTEMS is the assessment of mooring/berthing and seismic performance at existing and new marine oil terminals. Built in the 1950s, the terminal consists of an approximately 42-foot-wide, 242-foot-long pile-supported concrete Tanker Wharf, connected to shore by two approximately 20-foot-wide by 60-foot-long pile-supported concrete causeways. The concrete Tanker Wharf is supported on 16-inch-diameter octagonal prestressed concrete piles consisting of 75- and 80-foot-long plumb piles and 87-foot-long batter piles.

HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD PHASE 2 AND CANDLESTICK POINT, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Project Manager and Principal in Charge. Jeff has led the geotechnical design and construction of these joint projects since 2011. Together, the Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point areas comprise over 700 acres of waterfront land along San Francisco’s southeastern shore. ENGEO’s investigations for the site included drilling borings over water, in contaminated subsurface conditions, drilling inside Candlestick Park, drilling in an active housing development, and coordination with the Navy and the City of San Francisco. The site is also being raised to address potential sea level rise, which results in consolidation of the underlying Young Bay.

As part of this work, ENGEO performed an evaluation of the stability of the various structures that form the Hunters Point Shipyard shoreline under loading from both new fill as well as earthquakes.

Jeff brings experience coordinating
complex field investigations, providing
design recommendations and
collaborating with various stakeholders
in providing geotechnical services
to both public and private sector
clients. He is an expert in soft ground
engineering, liquefaction evaluation,
seismic site response, slope stability,
deep foundation design, ground
improvement, value engineering,
and structural construction. Jeff
has performed services for marine
structures in the San Francisco Bay
and Southern California areas. Jeff’s
experience with Port of Richmond
projects includes the role as the
geotechnical lead on projects such
as Terminal 4, Point Potrero Marine
Terminal Assessment, and Terminal One
Redevelopment.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH ENGEO
» 29 / 23

EDUCATION
» MS, Civil Engineering (Geotechnical
Engineering Specialization), 1997
» BS, Civil and Environmental, 1995

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Engineer: CA (Civil,
#58935; Geotechnical, #2631), NV,
» Professional Engineer,
» California Stormwater Quality
Association (CASQA) Qualified
SWPPP Developer (QSD) and
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP)
Certified (#83551)

JEFF FIPPIN, PE, GE, QSD (ENGEO)
526
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 34
P242864

COMMUNITY AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENT ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION – CALIFORNIA OSW FISHERIES WORKING GROUP AND TRIBAL ENGAGEMENT PRINCIPAL AND LEAD FACILITATOR, STATEWIDE. Senate Bill 286, approved by the Governor in October 2023, requires the establishment of a Working Group with representatives from the Coastal Commission, Department of Fish and Wildlife, State Lands Commission, Ocean Protection Council, and representatives of commercial and recreational fishing industries, OSW energy industries, representatives of California Native American Tribes with affected Tribal fisheries, and other stakeholders, as appropriate. K&W is leading the facilitation, planning, and implementation of the Working Group. Jenna serves as co-lead facilitator and supports the process design, materials development, and coordination with all members including California Native American Tribes.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION – AB 525 OUTREACH LEAD FACILITATOR, STATEWIDE.

In September 2021, the California Legislature passed, and the Governor signed Assembly Bill (AB) 525 (Chiu, Chapter 231, Statutes of 2021) requiring the CEC, in coordination with California state agencies and other relevant federal and local agencies as needed, to develop a strategic plan for OSW energy developments installed off the California coast in federal waters and submit it to the CNRA and the Legislature in 2023. K&W supported outreach with California fisheries to understand impacts and ways to mitigate those impacts. The K&W team has participated in and conducted situational assessments, meeting and process design, materials development, note taking, and facilitation. Jenna has been a lead facilitator for the fisheries outreach meetings and has led the planning and implementation of the fisheries outreach across California.

BOEM ATLANTIC – ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE STRATEGY FOR OFFSHORE WIND AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE (EJ) FORUMS, EAST COAST. BOEM enlisted K&W to assist in development of an EJ Community Engagement Plan for proposed OSW projects in the Atlantic region, with a specific focus on the New York Bight, New England, and Carolina Long Bay areas. Jenna was the lead facilitator for the project, providing strategy, design, and facilitation for a series of virtual listening sessions with over 50 community-based organizations, community leaders, and EJ practitioners to provide input on what they would like to see in BOEM’s EJ Community Engagement Plan for OSW. Jenna also developed recommendations for BOEM in engaging with environmental justice communities in future OSW projects.

BOEM – CALIFORNIA OSW ENERGY PLANNING OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT, STATEWIDE. Lead Facilitator & Project Manager. BOEM and California have been jointly engaged in planning for offshore renewable energy development and hired K&W to conduct outreach and engagement to key stakeholders, including fishing communities, coastal communities (including elected officials, renewable energy developers, environmental NGOs, and citizens), and data/science providers. Jenna serves as senior facilitator and project manager for multiple projects, including developing outreach addenda, designing and facilitating public meetings and small group meetings, and providing strategic direction on outreach and engagement.

BOEM – CALIFORNIA OSW INTERGOVERNMENTAL RENEWABLE ENERGY TASK FORCE FACILITATION, STATEWIDE. Lead Facilitator. K&W has been working to support BOEM and the State of California to facilitate the California Intergovernmental Task Force Meeting. Jenna provided strategic direction, agenda development, meeting objectives, and led engagement with Task Force members for multiple meetings.

Jenna has experience in community
outreach, stakeholder facilitation,
and planning. She has led complex
stakeholder processes with
environmental justice communities,
federal, state, and local government,
Tribes and Indigenous communities,
coastal communities, fishermen,
offshore energy developers,
environmental organizations,
recreational interests, and community
groups. Her experience includes leading
community-based organizations
focused on environmental justice and
equity, and facilitating collaborative
processes to address stakeholder
outcomes in ports and coastal
communities across the U.S.

Jenna is currently working with
California agencies and the federal
government on multiple projects
that impact ports in California,
including facilitating multiple OSW
Task Forces, engagement for NEPA
and lease sales, and Tribal summits.

She also helped develop coastal
community engagement, focused on
port communities, with federal and
state agencies and CBO groups. Jenna
also facilitates the California Coastal
Commission’s Condition 7C/SB 286
Fisheries Working Group for OSW with
fisheries across the California coast.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH KW
» 18 / 6

EDUCATION
» BA, International Development
» MURP, Urban and Regional Planning

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» American Institute of Certified
Planners (AICP)
» Certificate, Public Participation,
International Association of Public
Participation (IAP2)
JENNA TOURJÉ-MALDONADO, AICP (KEARNS & WEST)
527
PORT OF RICHMOND // 5. KEY PERSONNEL // 35
P242864

TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY, SUBSURFACE UTILITIES
PORT OF OAKLAND, BERTHS 55 THROUGH 59 WHARF UPGRADE, OAKLAND, CA. As part of the scope of work for engineering support of upgrades to Berths 55 through 59, Towill conducted project survey control, setting five semi-permanent monuments along the wharf. These surveys were tied to control points based on the old Port86 coordinate system (as based on densification surveys from points shown on Record of Survey 990). This project, done in 2021, experienced challenges with scheduling the work, as this is an active maritime terminal. Frank served as Towill’s project manager, designing the field survey, coordinating with the client about access challenges, and overseeing data processing and the development of the Survey Control Sheet.

PORT OF OAKLAND, MARITIME AND COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC BASE MAPPING, OAKLAND, CA. This project required a high-accuracy geodetic control survey and a master CAD/GIS geodatabase base map that represents commonly referenced airport, seaport, and general property features. Towill’s services included the geodetic control survey, acquisition and aerotriangulation of stereo aerial photography, stereo digitizing of base map features, and preparation of detailed planimetric/topographic mapping and orthophotography in CAD and GIS deliverable formats. Senior project manager, land surveying task leader, and PLS with duties including oversight of the project design; regular communication and coordination with Towill’s client (including preparation and submittal of monthly progress reports and invoices); managing and monitoring adherence to the project budget and schedule; technical oversight of staff assigned to the project (Towill and subconsultants) to confirm that their work conformed to scope of work requirements; and implementation of various QA/QC functions throughout the duration of the project.

PORT OF OAKLAND, MARITIME STREET SEWER TRUNK REPLACEMENT, OAKLAND, CA. Due to failing sanitary sewer lines in the vicinity of Maritime Street and 7th Street in the Port’s maritime area, Towill was originally tasked with conducting a topographic field survey of the intersection and approximately 200 feet in each direction. All sanitary and storm features had inverts measured, and utility markings done by others were surveyed. All information was combined into a single CAD file compliant with Port of Oakland standards. Additionally, Towill was tasked with developing a boundary line drawing based on best available information. With their history of work at the Port reviewing property acquisition documents, we were able to find existing maps and documents in the project area, in addition to request assistance from the Port Land Surveyor. The resulting boundary drawing showed the existing road ROW, SFBARTD ROW, UPRR ROW, an EBMUD easement, and existing historic property lines. In January 2023, the area was expanded and a topographic field survey was conducted where the existing sewer line heads south, extending the previous topographic survey roughly 1,100 feet along Maritime Street. To support the engineering plan set, a Survey Control Sheet was prepared showing newly set semi-permanent monuments and the existing Port monuments from which the surveys are based.

Frank is a Professional Land Surveyor
with 29 years of experience, providing
a unique blend of technical expertise
and management know-how. He has
performed and supervised projects
involving aeronautical surveys,
boundary surveys, legal descriptions
and plats, topographic base maps,
geodetic survey control, aerial
mapping, ALTA surveys, monitoring
surveys, construction staking,
hydrographic surveying, and LiDAR
scanning for clients both private and
public.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE / WITH TOWILL
» 29 / 18

EDUCATION
» BS, Surveying Engineering, 1996

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
» Professional Land Surveyor: CA
(#7922), NV, AZ, OR

FRANK BORGES, PLS (TOWILL)
528
PORT OF RICHMOND // 6. SIMILAR ASSESSMENTS RELATED TO OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS // 36 P242864

6. SIMILAR ASSESSMENTS RELATED TO

OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Selecting a consulting partner with the right experience can be the difference between successful project delivery and delays or overruns. As we have proven around the country and locations around the world, we are a leader in the OSW industry, providing studies, planning, and design. To best illustrate our experience, Figure 3 illustrates our extensive assessment experience for OSW projects. These are projects that have similar features to those expected at the Port. Figure 3 is followed by additional information about a sample of projects.

Our experience with general port infrastructure improvements is included in the next section.

EVALUATION CRITERIA #2
Eight of these Projects (1-5,
9-11) Demonstrate Experience
with California's OSW Initiatives
and Included Engagement with
Leaseholders (Developers) and
Key Organizations Developing
OSW.

P
FIGURE 3. MOFFATT & NICHOL OSW STUDY EXPERIENCE

PROJECT TYPE PHASE OF WORK

PROJECT NAME, LOCATION

OSW PORT PROJECTOSW SUPPLY CHAINPORT INFRASTRUCTURESTUDYPRELIMINARY ENGINEERINGDETAILED ENGINEERINGCONSTRUCTED 1 AB 525 Seaport and Workforce Development Strategic Plan for OSW (California State Lands Commission) //California X X X X
2 Alternative Port Assessment to Support Offshore Wind (California State Lands Commission) //California X X X X
3 California Floating Offshore Wind Regional Port Assessment (BOEM) 2023-010 //California X X X X 4 California Floating Offshore Wind Regional Port Feasibility Study (BOEM) 2023-038 // California X X X X
5 West Coast Ports Offshore Wind Strategy Study (NREL) //Washington, Oregon, California X X X X 6 Port of Coos Bay Infrastructure Assessment for Offshore Wind Development (BOEM) 2022- 073 //Coos Bay, OR X X X X
7 Hawai'i Floating Offshore Wind Regional Port Assessment (BOEM) 2024-039 // Hawai'i X X X X 8 Analysis of Offshore Wind Supply Chain Opportunities (NWSA) //Washington X X X X 9 Pier 94/96 Offshore Wind Terminal Conceptual Engineering (Port of San Francisco) //San Francisco, CA X X X X X
10 Pier Wind Offshore Wind Terminal (Port of Long Beach) //Long Beach, CA X X X X X 11 Redwood Marine Terminal Redevelopment for Offshore Wind (Port of Humboldt) //Samoa,

CA X X X X X
12 Atlantic City OSW Operations & Maintenance Terminal (Ørsted) // Atlantic City, NJ X X X X X X 13 State Pier Complex OSW Terminal (Connecticut Port Authority) // New London, CT X X X X X X X 14 Portsmouth Marine Terminal Virginia Offshore Wind Port (Virginia Port Authority) // Portsmouth, VA X X X X X X X
15 New Jersey Wind Port (New Jersey Economic Development Authority) //Lower Alloways Creek, NJ X X X X X X X
EVALUATION CRITERIA #3: Nine of these Projects (1-7, 10-11) Demonstrate Prime Contracting Experience P Managing Vendors and Programs Across Engineering, Strategic Planning, and Community and Tribal Outreach. 529
PORT OF RICHMOND // 6. SIMILAR ASSESSMENTS RELATED TO OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS // 37 P242864
California Assembly Bill 525 (AB 525) approved September 23, 2021, required the California Energy Commission (CEC), in coordination with the California Coastal Commission (CCC), the Ocean Protection Council, the State Lands Commission (SLC), the Office of Planning and Research, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development, the Independent System Operator, and the Public Utilities Commission, and other relevant federal, state, and local agencies as needed, to develop a strategic plan for OSW energy developments installed off the California coast in federal waters.

To support development of the AB 525 Strategic Plan, Moffatt & Nichol was engaged to develop the technical background for the Seaport and Workforce Development portion of the report. Moffatt & Nichol led a consultant team of OSW, port, marine, coastal, environmental, permitting, transportation, workforce development, and supply chain experts. The work on this contract included the following:
» A detailed assessment of the necessary investments in California seaports to support OSW energy activities, including construction, assembly, and O&M. The assessment considered the potential availability of land and water acreage at each seaport, including competing and current uses, infrastructure feasibility, access to deep water, bridge height restrictions, and potentially impacted natural and cultural resources, including coastal resources, fisheries, and Native American and Indigenous peoples.
» An analysis of the workforce development needs of the California OSW energy industry, including occupational safety requirements, the need to require skilled and trained workforce to perform all work, and the need for the Division of Apprenticeship Standards to develop curriculum for in-person classroom and laboratory advanced safety training for workers.

This work included significant outreach to the OSW industry (developers, OEMs, operators, etc.) and existing ports and harbors in California. The work evaluated the proximity of ports to current and future planned OSW energy areas. The seaport chapter evaluated OSW industry port needs, determined required number and size of port sites based on California deployment targets, evaluated the availability and suitability of existing port sites and potential greenfield sites, determined required port infrastructure improvements, evaluated impacts to natural and cultural resources, including coastal resources, fisheries, and Native American and Indigenous peoples, and developed cost estimates and port development timelines.

CLIENT: California State Lands Commission • CONTRACT START/END DATES: 2023

CALIFORNIA
AB 525 SEAPORT AND WORKFORCE

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN FOR

OFFSHORE WIND
Reports available at:
• AB 525 PORT READINESS PLAN
• AB525 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

READINESS PLAN
530
PORT OF RICHMOND // 6. SIMILAR ASSESSMENTS RELATED TO OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS // 38 P242864
Moffatt & Nichol is serving as the Owner’s engineer and program manager to help develop the Pier Wind project at the Port of Long Beach (POLB). The proposed Pier Wind project includes the construction of a new 400-acre terminal and 30-acre transportation corridor built within the Outer Harbor of the Port to support the manufacturing and assembly of OSW turbines, furthering the Nation’s and State’s renewable energy goals. The Port is proposing to dredge approximately 50 million cubic yards (MCY) of sediment from the navigation channels, berths, Western Anchorage Sediment Storage Site (WASSS), and additional adjacent areas. The creation of land will require the placement of an estimated 9.5 MCY of rock, 46 MCY of fill, and 4.7 MCY of surcharge. The project includes the installation of approximately 11,750 deep foundation piles for a 7,500 ft long heavy lift wharf capable of supporting a 6,000 psf design live load for heavy lift OSW crane activities. The project includes a surcharge and wick draining program to consolidate the placed fill to create uplands capable of heavy-lift crane and SPMT operations. The project includes significant wet storage areas consisting of both floating docks and buoy anchorages to support temporary storage and commissioning of turbine systems before tow-out.

Moffatt & Nichol was involved from project conception and is currently supporting the Port to deliver this project. Moffatt & Nichol completed or is currently leading all of the following tasks:

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

PIER WIND FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND

STAGING AND INTEGRATION PORT
» Project Management and Program Management
» Conceptual Engineering
» OSW Port Planning and Strategy
» Business, Finance, Project Delivery Planning
» Geotechnical Engineering and Investigation
» Dredge Material Sampling Investigation
» Dredge Material Placement Modeling
» Dredge and Sediment Management Planning
» Wave Data Collection Program
» Sand Borrow Site Assessment
» Heavy Lift Wharf Design
» Heavy Lift Crane Loading Assessment
» Uplands Design
» Transportation Planning (Marine and Land-based)
» Design of Roads and Utilities
» Civil and Electrical Engineering
» Seismic Analysis and Design
» FAA Airspace Impact Assessment
» Environmental Document Support
» Vessel Traffic Analysis
» Vessel Navigation Assessment and Simulation
» Wave Study, Ship Response, Downtime Assessment
» Tsunami and Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment
» OSW Floating Foundation and Turbine Mooring and
Anchorage Design
» Construction Logistics Planning
» Engineering Drawing Production
» Cost Estimate and Construction Scheduling
» Graphics and 3D Visualization
CLIENT: Port of Long Beach • CONTRACT START/END DATES: 2022 to Present 531
PORT OF RICHMOND // 6. SIMILAR ASSESSMENTS RELATED TO OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS // 39 P242864
Moffatt & Nichol is under contract to support several Port Authorities that were awarded funding under the CEC GFO-24- 701 grants. We are serving to complete the work in compliance with the grant requirements, including general project tasks, master planning, conceptual and preliminary engineering, community engagement, tribal government engagement, agency engagement, stakeholder outreach, cost estimating, emission reduction strategy development, workforce development strategy, and evaluation of project benefits. The following projects were awarded funding with Moffatt & Nichol serving as prime consultant to deliver the grant funded projects. Our teams experience delivering projects awarded under the same grant as the Port of Richmond will provide efficiencies and stretch the value and impact of the awarded funds.

Pier Wind, Long Beach, CA: The Port of Long Beach was awarded $20 million for the Pier Wind Project. Moffatt & Nichol is serving as the prime consultant for the project and is responsible to deliver the work required under the grant.

Humboldt Bay Offshore Wind Heavy Lift Marine Terminal, Samoa, CA: The Port of Humboldt was awarded $18.25 million for the Humboldt Bay OSW Heavy Lift Marine Terminal. Moffatt & Nichol is serving as the prime consultant for the project and is responsible to deliver the work required under the grant.

Port of Oakland, Oakland, CA: The Port of Oakland was awarded $750,000 to prepare a feasibility and business case study for OSW port infrastructure. Moffatt & Nichol supported the Port to prepare the grant application and will serve as the prime consultant to deliver the project in compliance with the grant requirements.

CALIFORNIA
GFO-24-701 CEC GRANT FUNDED OFFSHORE WIND

ENERGY WATERFRONT FACILIT Y IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM PROJECTS
532
PORT OF RICHMOND // 6. SIMILAR ASSESSMENTS RELATED TO OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS // 40 P242864
Moffatt & Nichol is serving as the prime consultant to assist the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation, and Conservation District with the planning, engineering special studies, and early phases of environmental documentation and permitting for the redevelopment of the approximate 180-acre site to serve the OSW industry. The ongoing work includes the following:
» Conceptual engineering to a 30% design level to inform project funding, establish project basis and extents, and establish the permitting and environmental impacts to serve as a basis for initiation of the permitting process. » Comprehensive site data collection program to support the engineering and permitting process. » Developing and submitting all long-lead permit applications. » Developing and progressing key components and special studies for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document.
» Engaging OSW developers and stakeholders to confirm site development approach will serve the industry. » Developing a project basis of design and design criteria. » Documenting all critical engineering decisions made during the conceptual engineering phase. » Evaluating additional sites within the Port of Humboldt to serve the OSW industry. » Workforce assessment.
» Tribal Government engagement.
» Stakeholder and Community outreach.
» Agency outreach and engagement.

CLIENT: Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation, and Conservation District • CONTRACT START/END DATES: 2022 to Present

SAMOA, CALIFORNIA

HUMBOLDT BAY OFFSHORE WIND

HEAVY LIFT MARINE TERMINAL
533
PORT OF RICHMOND // 6. SIMILAR ASSESSMENTS RELATED TO OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS // 41 P242864
Moffatt & Nichol served as the prime consultant to support the Port of San Francisco to evaluate the existing Pier 94/96 terminal to support the OSW industry. Pier 94/96 was constructed in the 1960s, featuring deep-draft berths, maintenance and operational buildings, four ship-to-shore container cranes, and on-dock rail with access to the freight rail network. The existing berth depth is maintained at 38 feet at low tide.

Several potential site uses were evaluated for Pier 94/96 to support the OSW industry, including manufacturing of floating foundations, manufacturing of OSW components, construction support, mooring line, anchor, and electrical cable laydown, and use as a home port for operations and maintenance activities for the wind energy area. For this study, the selected alternative was to develop a concept to use Pier 94/96 for the manufacturing of floating foundations and/or wind turbine generator components.

The project area comprises approximately 95 acres of uplands and a new heavy-lift wharf at Pier 94/96. The proposed project includes demolition of the existing wharf and cranes to enable the construction of a new heavy-lift wharf with a design capacity of 6,000 psf. Improvements needed for the uplands area were also analyzed and detailed, e.g., deep soil mixing ground improvements to mitigate liquefaction-induced settlement of the existing slope and reduce lateral spreading during the design seismic event.

Cost estimates and scheduling projections for the proposed site improvements were developed as part of the conceptual engineering study.

CLIENT: Port of San Francisco • CONTRACT START/END DATES: 2023 to 2025

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO PIER 94/96 OFFSHORE WIND CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING STUDY 534
PORT OF RICHMOND // 7. PORT INFRASTRUCTURE RELATED PROJECTS // 42 P242864

7. PORT INFRASTRUCTURE RELATED PROJECTS
As the largest dedicated marine terminal engineering firm in the US, we have significant experience working on port infrastructure related projects for all cargo types. Our firm started in 1945 helping build up the navy shipyard in Long Beach and we have specialized in port infrastructure projects ever since. A sample of port infrastructure projects led by our project manager (Matt Trowbridge) are highlighted in Figure 4 below. More detailed project descriptions of selected projects (identified by "*") are provided on the following pages. Additional project examples are available upon request.

FIGURE 4. MOFFATT & NICHOL PORT EXPERIENCE

PROJECT NAME, LOCATION DESCRIPTION
* Point Potrero Marine Terminal Condition
Assessment (Port of Richmond) //
Richmond, CA
Prime consultant for an inspection and condition assessment of existing infrastructure at the Point Potrero Marine Terminal including Berths 5-6 (lay berth), Berths 7-8 (auto terminal), Graving Basins, and Finger Piers.
* State Pier Wind Staging Terminal (Connecticut
Port Authority) // New London, CT
Prime consultant for the detailed design of an OSW staging port to support installation of turbines, blades, and tower sections. Designed two heavy lift berths capable of supporting 5,000 psf.

Berths 35-38 and 60-63 Wharf Soffit
Repairs (Port of Oakland) // Oakland, CA
Prime consultant for inspection and design of repairs to chloride-induced corrosion of the deck soffit on existing concrete wharf structures.
* Berths 55-59 Wharf Upgrade (Port of
Oakland) // Oakland, CA
Prime consultant to design upgrades to an existing container wharf to accommodate ultra large container vessels including wharf strengthening and new fenders and bollards.

TCEP Green Power Microgrid Project (Port of
Oakland) // Oakland, CA
Prime consultant to design 145 heavy duty electric vehicle charging stations, 1 MW solar generation system, and a 6.5 MW battery energy storage system.

Pier 27 Cruise Vessel Allision Inspection
and Repairs (Port of San Francisco) //San
Francisco, CA
Prime consultant to perform post-event inspection and design of repairs.

Rapid Structural Assessments (Port of San
Francisco) //San Francisco, CA
Prime consultant for above water inspection and condition assessment of 12 existing terminals on the San Francisco northern waterfront from the Hyde Street Harbor Fuel Dock to Pier 23.5.

Emergency Post-Event Inspection and Fire
Repairs (Port of Benicia) // Benicia, CA
Prime consultant for emergency post-event inspection after a fire event at the AMPORTS pet coke export berth in 2022. Developed innovative repair approach and supported owner to secure emergency permits.

Port-Wide Underwater Inspections (Port of
Long Beach) //Long Beach, CA Prime consultant to provide underwater and above water inspection of all port infrastructure.

Middle Harbor Container Terminal
Redevelopment (Port of Long Beach) //
Long Beach, CA
Prime consultant for major redevelopment project to combine and reconfigure existing Piers D, E, and F to develop an automated container terminal to accommodate 18,000 and 24,000 twenty-foot equivalent (TEU) vessels.

STS Crane Offload and Permitting (Long
Beach Container Terminal) //Long Beach, CA
Prime consultant to develop permit and calculation package for the successful offload of 120-foot gage container cranes.

Berth 226-236 Container Terminal
Improvements (Port of Los Angeles) //Los
Angeles, CA
Prime consultant on a berth deepening and fender and bollard upgrade project to accommodate 18,000 twenty-foot equivalent (TEU) unit vessels.

Berth 100 South Extension (Port of Los
Angeles) //Los Angeles, CA Prime consultant for project to extend an existing container wharf.

Terminal 5 Modernization (Port of Seattle)
//Seattle, WA
Prime consultant for major modernization project to perform wharf upgrades and ground improvements to handle vessels up to 18,000 TEUs.

Maine Port Infrastructure Assessment
(Maine Department of Transportation) //
Searsport, ME
Prime consultant for a study to evaluate and select a site to be developed to serve as a floating OSW port terminal.

Industrial Canal OSW Concept Study (Port
of Lake Charles) //Lake Charles, LA Prime consultant for a study to redevelop the industrial canal site to serve the OSW industry.

Berth 9 Rehabilitation (Port of Lake
Charles) //Lake Charles, LA
Prime consultant for a bulkhead wall inspection and rehabilitation / repair project. The wall rehabilitation design required a unique structural solution to allow Port vessel and terminal operations to continue without interruption during construction.

Berth 4, 5, & 6 Mooring Upgrades (Port of
Lake Charles) //Lake Charles, LA
Prime consultant for a mooring upgrade project to add new mooring bollards to an existing wharf to accommodate larger vessels.
535
PORT OF RICHMOND // 7. PORT INFRASTRUCTURE RELATED PROJECTS // 43 P242864
The City of Richmond recently embarked on a critical effort to assess the existing infrastructure at the Port of Richmond Point Potrero Marine Terminal. This assessment serves to inform the Port’s strategic plan and support the City of Richmond’s goal to sustain and grow Port operations. The condition assessment includes Berths 7-8 (Auto Terminal), Berths 5-6 (Lay Berth), Graving Basins, and Finger Piers. The Port’s priorities included identifying projects to improve safety and security, providing division between port operations and public amenities and attractions, and completing long-term planning to expand port operations.

The first step to long-term planning is to complete the condition assessment to determine infrastructure needs, priorities, budgetary estimates, and opportunities for expanded operations. The Port of Richmond is a smaller port with limited funding so all work performed on this contract was focused on efficient use of funding to provide significant value for the City of Richmond.

The Kaiser Richmond shipyards at the Point Potrero Marine Terminal, constructed in the 1940s, played a significant role in supporting the war effort during World War II. In 2009, the Port converted some of the facilities into a state-of-the-art roll-on/ roll-off (Ro/Ro) automobile import terminal. However, the Port has other marine infrastructure assets that are underutilized and in need of investment to attract revenue-generating tenants and operators.

Moffatt & Nichol was engaged by the City of Richmond to lead the assessment and long-term planning. Power served as a key subconsultant providing inspection boats and confined space entry oversight for the inspection work.

CLIENT: City of Richmond • CONTRACT START/END DATES: 2025

RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA

POINT POTRERO MARINE TERMINAL

CONDITION ASSESSMENT
536
PORT OF RICHMOND // 7. PORT INFRASTRUCTURE RELATED PROJECTS // 44 P242864
Moffatt & Nichol was selected by Ørsted (Northeast Offshore, LLC) to complete the detailed design for a wind turbine generation port at the State Pier Complex in New London, Connecticut. This terminal will import, stage, preassemble, and load out turbine, tower, and blade components for large commercial scale OSW installations. The terminal currently imports bulk material and requires significant retrofits and upgrades to the existing marine infrastructure.

As prime consultant, Moffatt & Nichol completed a feasibility study and concept design for this terminal as part of a phase 1 planning study. During this effort, Moffatt & Nichol worked with the developer to gain a firm understanding of the wind turbine generation logistics and component handling requirements. The terminal was designed to accommodate multiple OSW logistics models so that maximum flexibility for various projects and operators could be maintained. The terminal design consisted of 30 acres of uplands and eight acres of marine infrastructure.

Upland design comprised demolition of existing buildings; site grading and compaction; design of a stormwater system; and design of electrical systems, including nacelle plug in ports. Marine infrastructure design consisted of ±1,000-foot heavy lift bulkhead, pile-supported structures to accommodate loads up to 5,000 psf and 800 tons, and seven acres of in-water fill placement between two existing piers. Moffatt & Nichol has worked closely with the appropriate permitting agencies to provide permitting drawings, resources calculations, and technical permitting assistance.

CLIENT: Ørsted (Northeast Offshore, LLC), Connecticut Port Authority • CONTRACT START/END DATES: 2019 to 2024

NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT

STATE PIER COMPLEX WIND

TURBINE GENERATION PORT
537
PORT OF RICHMOND // 7. PORT INFRASTRUCTURE RELATED PROJECTS // 45 P242864
Moffatt & Nichol is the engineer-of-record to upgrade the Oakland International Container Terminal at Berths 55-59 to accommodate ultra-large container vessels (ULCVs) up to 24,000 TEUs. The existing facility was designed for an 8,000 TEU vessel, with Berths 55-56 constructed in 2002 and Berths 57-58 constructed in 2005. Currently, the facility can accommodate vessels up to 18,000 TEUs.

The upgrade project included wharf underdeck and topside inspection, surveying, a berth deepening evaluation, mooring and passing vessel analyses, a berthing analysis, fender design, bollard design, wharf strengthening improvements, cost estimating, project scheduling, construction sequencing and phasing, and construction support services.

Terminal operating limit drawings were developed to provide operational limits for the range of vessels calling at the terminal.

Designing the high capacity bollards required advanced finite element modeling of the bollard base plate and anchorage to confirm adequacy.

The capacity of the existing fenders and bollards was found to be inadequate for the larger vessels. Work includes removing and disposing existing fenders and bollards and installing larger fenders and bollards. The team confirmed quantity, location, and capacity of new bollards to provide optimal mooring arrangements and to ensure the facility can handle the range of vessel sizes anticipated to call on the terminal. Berths 55-56 wharf deck capacities are not adequate to accommodate the larger berthing loads generated by the new fenders and larger vessels. Therefore, we designed wharf strengthening improvements, including structural steel bracing system to transfer fender loads into the waterside crane beam and piles.

CLIENT: Port of Oakland • CONTRACT START/END DATES: 2021 to 2025

OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA
PORT OF OAKLAND BERTHS 55-59 WHARF UPGRADES
538
PORT OF RICHMOND // 8. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH PROGRAMS // 46 P242864

8. DIRECT MANAGEMENT OF OR OVERSIGHT OF COMMUNITY

ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH PROGRAMS
We see clear and successful communication as one of the most critical aspects of successful project management.

Public infrastructure projects often proceed at a rapid pace, and frequent communication between all parties is essential to keep any given project on track. Our team understands that the Port of Richmond may want stakeholder outreach to run through the agency, or our team can take the lead at your direction. To that end, we have engaged the services of Kearns & West (K&W) to lead our public engagement activities.

This is the structure we have used on projects throughout California and across the country, using local firms with strong ties to the local community and know the unique fabric
of the community. We know it is important to distribute information to, and solicit input from, the right people at the right time. A well-planned stakeholder outreach and engagement effort will support and enhance continuous
project progress. Stakeholders will be consulted early on, providing an opportunity to resolve issues that may impede project progress down the road and, potentially, saving the Port of Richmond time and money. Two examples of
K&W's community and Tribal experience are included
over following two pages.

The team will work closely with the Port of Richmond
staff to develop a Community Engagement Strategy
that will serve as the “roadmap” for meaningful, effective engagement with local community members, including
under-resourced communities, throughout the Port Plan
development process. The strategy will identify desired public participation outcomes for the project and detail specific stakeholder communication and engagement
activities to achieve those outcomes. The strategy will include a timeline for implementing engagement activities that is directly connected to the development timelines for the technical work associated with the Project. It will also outline innovative approaches to reach members of
the community and stakeholders that may not ordinarily
participate in the planning process.

K&W will conduct early engagement discussions with key
community organizations and members via virtual informal interviews. The team will work closely with Port staff to develop a list of key interviewees and an interview guide, and identify key interviewees that represent a cross-section of community interests in the region. K&W will prepare
a draft Community Engagement Strategy outline for
the Port’s review. K&W will use this outline to inform the interview guide and make sure that all key engagement
topics needed are addressed. K&W will also conduct
informal interviews, prepare an interview summary report, and develop a final draft Community Engagement Strategy that incorporates key findings from the interviews.

LOCAL EXPERIENCE WITH STAKEHOLDER

AND TRIBAL OUTREACH AND INVOLVEMENT
Team member Kearns & West has extensive local engagement experience on similar projects:

LOCAL AND UNDER-RESOURCED COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT PROJECTS:
• City of Richmond, Keller Beach Sanitary Sewer Project • City of Richmond Greenway Rail-Trail Project
• Bay Area Air District Community Air Quality Monitoring Program • Port of San Francisco Seawall Earthquake Safety and Disaster Prevention Program
OSW AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGAGEMENT PROJECTS:
• California Coastal Commission (CCC) SB 286/ Condition 7C Fisheries Working Group for OSW and California Tribal Engagement
• California Energy Commission (CEC) AB 525 Fisheries
Engagement for the Development of the OSW Strategy
• Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) California OSW Community Engagement
• BOEM Atlantic Environmental Justice Strategy for OSW and EJ Forums
• BOEM New York Bight OSW Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement (PEIS) Community Engagement and
Environmental Justice Forum Series
TRIBAL ENGAGEMENT PROJECTS:
• BOEM California OSW Tribal Listening Sessions
• County of Los Angeles - County Land Acknowledgment, Harms Report, and Toolkit
• US Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Basin Equity and Tribal Engagement
539
PORT OF RICHMOND // 8. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH PROGRAMS // 47 P242864
Since September 2021, Kearns & West has provided facilitation and community outreach for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process on the Humboldt and Morro Bay Wind Energy Areas with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM).

They were involved in the facilitation and coordination of Scoping, Draft Environmental Assessment, and fishing communities outreach meetings, as well as note taking support for Tribal government-to-government consultation meetings. Critical issues included renewable energy, impacts on communities and marine life, and environmental justice. Work on the NEPA process included assisting with the development of a video overviewing the NEPA process, preparation and facilitation of virtual public meetings, providing meeting documentation support, providing review of materials, conducting in-person outreach with fishing communities, and note taking support for Tribal government-to-government consultation meetings.

CLIENT: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) • CONTRACT START/END DATES: 2021 to 2025

CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA OFFSHORE WIND

RENEWABLE ENERGY OUTREACH
In 2023, BOEM collaborated with the California Energy Commission (CEC), the California Coastal Commission (CCC), and other state and federal agencies to develop and facilitate a working group consisting of fishing organizations and representatives from various regions and ports across the state. This group includes individuals from different fisheries and gear types, encompassing both the commercial and recreational sectors, as well as California tribes, lessees, and state and federal agency staff. The working group is tasked with developing a statewide strategy focused on the avoidance, minimization, and mitigation of impacts on fishing and fisheries, prioritizing fisheries productivity, viability, and long-term resilience.

This strategy includes protocols for communication, best practices for surveys and data collection, a methodology for comprehensive socioeconomic analysis of direct and indirect impacts on fishing, a framework for compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts, and a Fishing Agreement template to memorialize the strategy elements. Kearns & West leads several key tasks, from strategic guidance to materials development to communications, involving tribal communities, fishing communities, industry, and partners to support the CEC, BOEM, and CCC in planning and facilitating the working group.

CLIENT: California Energy Commission (CEC) and California Coastal Commission (CCC) • CONTRACT START/END DATES: 2023 to Present

CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA OFFSHORE WIND

FISHERIES WORKING GROUP
540
PORT OF RICHMOND // 9. REFERENCES // 48
P242864
FIGURE 5. REFERENCES

NAME, TITLE AGENCY PHONE / EMAIL
Clint Herrera, Director of Engineering Design Port of Long Beach (562) 283-7208 [email protected]
Thanh Vuong, Port Principal Engineer Port of Oakland (510) 627-1266 [email protected]
Nick Pestello, Director of Engineering and Maintenance Port of Lake Charles (337) 493-3627 [email protected]

9. REFERENCES
We encourage you to contact our references provided below to learn more about the high level of service we as a firm provide.

Rendering of the proposed Port of Lake Charles (LA) Industrial Canal Offshore Wind Port from our Concept Study. 541
PORT OF RICHMOND // 10. RMC CHAPTER REQUIREMENTS // 49
P242864

10. RMC CHAPTER REQUIREMENTS
Moffatt & Nichol understands and supports the City’s intentions with its local business and employment goals articulated in RMC chapters 2.50, 2.56, and 2.60:
» 2.50 – to encourage the use of Richmond-based businesses » 2.56 – to encourage the hiring of City of Richmond residents » 2.60 – to meet the City of Richmond's Living Wage guidelines When assembling our team for this contract, we investigated the potential for using City of Richmond businesses. However, due to the specific technical nature of the contract and limited availability of subconsultants that could meet those technical requirements, we were unable to identify any Richmond-based businesses to use on our team. However, as the contract is undertaken and potential additional work or unforeseen needs arise, we will work closely with the Port and the City to identify local businesses who could perform services as part of this contract. With respect to RMC Chapter 2.56, we do not anticipate a need to hire as a result of this contract. Please note that we employ a City of Richmond resident in our Walnut Creek office and will continue to seek to hire qualified candidates from Richmond as needed.

We have reviewed the Living Wage requirements of Chapter 2.60 and will comply.

Rendering of the New Jersey Wind Port, under construction in Lower Alloways Creek. 542
Contact:

Matt Trowbridge, PE, SE
Project Manager
(510) 788-8959
[email protected]
Moffatt & Nichol
1300 Clay Street, Suite 350
Oakland, CA 94612
P243336
543

PORT OF RICHMOND // FEE PROPOSAL
P242864
May 30, 2025
Charles Gerard, Port Director
Port of Richmond
1322 Canal Blvd.

Richmond, CA 94804
Uploaded to PlanetBids
RE: PORT OF RICHMOND CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR OFFSHORE WIND

FEE ESTIMATE
Dear Mr. Gerard and Members of the Selection Committee:

As requested in the Request for Proposal, this separate document provides our fee estimate and budgetary assumptions for the work.

Please see attached for a detailed fee estimate spreadsheet.

Very truly yours,

MOFFATT & NICHOL
Matthew Trowbridge, PE, SE
Vice President, Project Manager
Office: (510) 788-8959 / (Cell) 562-505-2138
[email protected]
FIGURE 1. COST PROPOSAL

TASK TASK NAME FEE
1 Project Management and General Project Tasks $45,500
2 Conceptual Study and Port Master Plan $61,500
3 Community Engagement Strategy $45,500
4 Tribal Government Engagement Strategy $24,500
5 Agency Engagement Strategy $22,000
6 Stakeholder Outreach Strategy $18,500
7 Preliminary Engineering $361,500
8 Cost Estimate and Schedule $45,500
9 Emissions Reduction Strategy $25,500
10 Workforce Development Strategy $25,500
11 Evaluation of Project Benefits $5,500
TOTAL: $681,000
10% Contingency: $69,000
TOTAL: $750,000
1300 Clay Street, Suite 350
Oakland CA 94612
Tel: (510) 645-1238
moffattnichol.com
FIGURE 2. COST PROPOSAL (BY TEAM MEMBER)
FIRM FEE (ROUNDED) %
Moffatt & Nichol $397,300 58%
Kearns & West $70,000 10%
Towill $54550 8%
Woolpert $20000 3%
ENGEO $113650 17%
BW Research $25500 4%
TOTAL FEE: $681,000
Total Fee With 10% 100%
Contingency: $750,000
544

PORT OF RICHMOND // FEE PROPOSAL
P242864

DETAILED SUMMARY TABLE
545

PORT OF RICHMOND // FEE PROPOSAL
P242864

DETAILED LABOR TABLE
546
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT PROVISIONS

1. COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR:
a. Provided Contractor is not in default under this Contract, Contractor shall be compensated in the manner set forth herein.
b. All payments made pursuant to this Contract shall be subject to the Contract Payment Limit. The Payment Limit includes expenses (phones, photocopying, meals and travel, etc.). Invoices shall be adequately detailed, based on accurate records, and be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City. Contractor may be required to provide back-up material upon request. c. All City vendors receiving new contracts shall sign up to receive electronic payments through the City’s Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) payments service/provider.

2. SUBMISSION OF INVOICES:

Contractor shall submit timely invoices by email to
[email protected] and/or to the following address:

Attention: City of Richmond Finance/Account Payable
Project Manager: _______________________
P.O. Box 4046
Richmond, CA 94804

3. All invoices that are submitted by Contractor shall be subject to the approval of the City Project Manager, _______________________, before payments shall be authorized.
a. The City will pay invoice(s) within 45 days after completion of services to the City’s satisfaction. The City shall not pay late fees or interest.
b. All appropriate permits, certificates, and licenses, including a City business license shall be obtained and maintained for the duration of this Contract before any payment is authorized.

4. All insurance coverage required by this Contract shall be provided by the Contractor before this Contract is executed by the City. The insurance coverage required by this Contract shall be maintained by Contractor for the duration of this Contract and must be in place before any payment is authorized.

Charles Gerard Charles Gerard Moffatt & Nichol
547
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT C

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES AND NOTICES

1. All required written notices shall be delivered: (i) by hand; or (ii) sent by registered, express, or certified mail, with return receipt requested or with delivery confirmation requested from the U.S. postal service; or (iii) sent by overnight or same day courier service at the party’s respective address listed in this Section.

2. Each notice shall be deemed to have been received on the earlier to occur of:
actual delivery or the date on which delivery is refused; or three (3) days after notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or with a courier service in the manner described above (Sundays and City holidays excepted).

3. Either party may, at any time, change its notice address (other than to a post office box address) by giving the other party three (3) days prior written notice of the new address.

4. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from Contractor to the City shall be addressed to the City at:

City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Email: ________________________________________________

5. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from the City to Contractor shall be addressed to Contractor at:

Attn:

Email: ________________________________________________ Charles Gerard [email protected] Moffatt & Nichol Moffatt & Nichol 1300 Clay St, Ste. 350 Oakland, CA, 94612 [email protected] Matthew Trowbridge 548
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT D

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. INDEPENDENT PARTIES:

Contractor hereby declares that Contractor is engaged as an independent business and Contractor agrees to perform the services as an independent contractor.

The manner and means of conducting the services and tasks are under the control of Contractor except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the express terms of this Contract. No civil service status or other right of employment will be acquired by virtue of Contractor’s services. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including but not limited to unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation plans, vacation and sick leave, are available from the City to Contractor, its employees or agents. Deductions shall not be made for any state or federal taxes, FICA payments, PERS payments, or other purposes normally associated with an employer-employee relationship from any compensation due to Contractor. Payments of the above items, if required, are the responsibility of Contractor.

2. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE:

Contractor and the City agree that time is of the essence regarding the performance of this Contract.

3. STANDARD OF CARE:

Contractor agrees to perform all services hereunder in a manner commensurate with the prevailing standards of like professionals or service Contractors, as applicable, in the San Francisco Bay Area and agrees that all services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by the City.

4. IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT (IRCA):

Contractor assumes all responsibility for verifying the identity and employment authorization of all of its employees performing work hereunder, pursuant to all applicable IRCA or other federal, or state rules and regulations. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from and against any loss, damage, liability, costs or expenses arising from any noncompliance of this provision by Contractor.

5. NON-DISCRIMINATION:

Consistent with the City’s policy and state and federal law that harassment and discrimination are unacceptable conduct, Contractor and its employees, contractors, and agents shall not harass or discriminate against any job applicant, City employee, or any other person on the basis of any kind of any statutorily (federal, state or local) protected class, including but not limited to: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, Moffatt & Nichol
549
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
disability (both mental and physical) including HIV and AIDS, medical condition (e.g. cancer), genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, pregnancy, political affiliation, military and veteran status or legitimate union activities. Contractor agrees that any violation of this provision shall constitute a material breach of this Contract.

6. CITY PROPERTY:
a. Each and every report, draft, work product, map, record, applicable plans, drawings, calculation, data, specification, video, graphic, or any other material or document produced, prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor pursuant to or in connection with this Contract shall be the exclusive property of the City. b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Contractor shall not be obligated to provide to City proprietary software or data which Contractor has developed or had developed for Contractor's own use; provided, however, that Contractor shall, pursuant to Section 11 below, indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from and against any discovery or Public Records Act request seeking the disclosure of such proprietary software or data. c. No report, information or other data given to or prepared or assembled by Contractor pursuant to this Contract shall be made available to any individual or organization by Contractor without prior approval of the City Manager or their designee. d. Contractor shall, at such time and in such form as City Manager or their designee may require, furnish reports concerning the status of services and tasks required under this Contract.

7. RECORDS:
a. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the services, tasks, work, documents and data in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of Contractor’s performance under the Contract, as well as maintain books and records related to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by the City that relate to the performance of the services and tasks under this Contract (collectively the “Records”).
b. All Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the Records to the representatives of the City or its designees during regular business hours upon reasonable prior notice. The City has the right to examine and audit the Records, and to make copies or transcripts therefrom as necessary, and to allow inspection of all proceedings and activities related to this Contract. Such Records, together with supporting documents, shall be kept separate from other documents and records and shall be maintained by Contractor for a period of five (5) years after receipt of final payment.

Moffatt & Nichol
550
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
c. If supplemental examination or audit of the Records is necessary due to concerns raised by the City’s preliminary examination or audit of records, and the City’s supplemental examination or audit of the records discloses a failure to adhere to appropriate internal financial controls, or other breach of this Contract or failure to act in good faith, then Contractor shall reimburse the City for all reasonable costs and expenses associated with the supplemental examination or audit.

8. PERMITS AND LICENSES:

Contractor, at its sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Contract, all appropriate permits, certificates and licenses, including a City business license, required in connection with the performance of the services and tasks hereunder.

The failure to obtain such permits and licenses shall be a material breach of this Contract and grounds for immediate termination by City; provided, however, that City may waive the business license requirement in writing under unusual or extraordinary circumstances without necessitating any modification of this Contract to reflect such waiver.

9. TERMINATION:
a. Termination Without Default. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the City may, in its sole and absolute discretion and without cause, terminate this Contract at any time prior to completion by Contractor of the project or services hereunder immediately upon transmission of written notice to Contractor as provided in Exhibit C “Authorized Representatives and Notices”.
b. Termination in the Event of Default. Should Contractor fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, within the time and in the manner provided or otherwise violate any of the terms of this Contract, City may immediately terminate this Contract by giving written notice of such termination, stating the reasons for such termination. Contractor shall be compensated as provided in Exhibit B; provided, however, there shall be deducted from such amount the amount of damage, including attorney's fees, expert witness fees and costs, if any, sustained by City by virtue of Contractor's breach of this Contract. Additionally, in the event of such termination, the City may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses.

10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

Contractor acknowledges, represents and warrants that Contractor shall avoid all conflicts of interest (as defined under any federal, state or local statute, rule or regulation, or at common law) with respect to this Contract. Contractor further acknowledges, represents and warrants that no City official or employee has any economic interest, as defined in Title 2, California Code of Regulations §§ 18703.1 through 18703.5, with Contractor that would invalidate this Contract. Contractor acknowledges that in the event that Contractor shall be found by any judicial or administrative body to have any conflict of interest (as defined above) with respect to this Contract, all consideration received under Moffatt & Nichol
551
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
this Contract shall be forfeited and returned to City forthwith. This provision shall survive the termination of this Contract for one (1) year.

11. HOLD HARMLESS:
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend (with counsel acceptable to the City) and hold harmless the City, its City Council, boards, commissions, officials, employees, agents and volunteers (“Indemnitees”) from and against any and all loss, damages, liability, obligations, claims, suits, judgments, costs and expenses whatsoever, including attorney’s fees and costs of litigation (“Claims”), arising from or in any manner connected to Contractor’s performance of its obligations under this Contract or failure to comply with any of its obligations under this Contract or out of the operations conducted by Contractor even if the City is found to have been negligent. If the Claims filed against Indemnitees allege negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct on the part of Contractor, Contractor shall have no right of reimbursement against Indemnitees for the costs of defense even if negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct is not found on the part of Contractor. Contractor shall not have any obligations to indemnify Indemnitees if the loss or damage is found to have resulted solely from the negligence or the willful misconduct of the City. The defense and indemnification obligations of this Contract are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Contract. b. This indemnification obligation shall survive this Contract and shall not be limited by any term of any insurance policy required under this Contract; provided however, that if this Contract is for design professional services, this indemnity provision is limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the design professional (as defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8).

12. LIMITATIONS UPON SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENT:
a. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract and shall not assign this Contract, nor any portion hereof or monies due or to become due, without the prior written consent of the City Council or its designee.
b. Contractor shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Contract, or any interest therein, directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise, without prior written consent of the City Manager. Contractor shall submit a written request for consent to transfer to the City Manager at least thirty (30) days in advance of the desired transfer.

The City Manager or their designee may consent or reject such request in their sole and absolute discretion. Any attempt to do so without said consent shall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. However, claims for Moffatt & Nichol
552
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
money against the City under this Contract may be assigned by Contractor to a bank, trust company or other financial institution without prior written consent. c. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Contractor (if applicable), or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member if Contractor is a partnership or jointventure or syndicate, which shall result in a change of control of Contractor, shall be deemed an assignment. For this purpose, control shall mean fifty percent or more of the voting power or twenty-five percent or more of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint-venture.
d. Only those persons and/or businesses whose names and resumés are attached to this Contract shall be used in the performance of this Contract. However, if after the start of this Contract, Contractor wishes to use sub-contractors, at no additional costs to the City, then Contractor shall submit a written request for consent to add subcontractors including the names of the sub-contractors and the reasons for the request to the City Manager at least five (5) days in advance. The City Manager may consent or reject such requests in their sole and absolute discretion. e. Each sub-contractor shall be required to furnish proof of workers’ compensation insurance and shall also be required to carry general, automobile and professional liability insurance (as applicable) in reasonable conformity to the insurance carried by Contractor.
f. In addition, any tasks or services performed by sub-contractors shall be subject to each provision of this Contract. Contractor shall include the following language in their Contract with any sub-contractor: “Sub-Contractors hired by Contractor agree to be bound to Contractor and the City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to the City.”
g. The requirements in this Section 12 shall not apply to persons who are merely providing materials, supplies, data or information that Contractor then analyzes and incorporates into its work product.

13. SAFETY:
a. Contractor acknowledges that the City is committed to the highest standards of workplace safety. Contractor will be solely and completely responsible for conditions of all vehicles owned or operated by Contractor, including the safety of all persons and property during performance of the services and tasks under this Contract.

Contractor shall assume sole and complete responsibility for the safety of Contractor's employees and any of subcontractor's employees This requirement will apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. In addition, Contractor will comply with all safety provisions in conformance with U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Act, any equivalent state law, and all other applicable Moffatt & Nichol
553
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
federal, state, county and local laws, ordinances, codes, and any regulations that may be detailed in other parts of the Contract. Where any of these are in conflict, the more stringent requirements will be followed. Contractor’s failure to thoroughly familiarize itself with the aforementioned safety provisions will not relieve it from compliance with the obligations and penalties set forth herein.
b. Contractor will immediately notify the City (in no event less than 24 hours) of any incident of death, serious personal injury or substantial property damage that occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract. Contractor will promptly submit to the City a written report of all incidents that occur in connection with this Contract. This report must include the following information: (i) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); (ii) name and address of Contractor’s employee(s) involved in the incident; (iii) name and address of Contractor’s liability insurance carrier; (iv) a detailed description of the incident; and (v) a police report.
c. Contractor acknowledges that the City shall have the right to impose, at the City’s sole discretion, requirements that it deems are necessary to protect the health and safety of the City employees, residents, and visitors. Contractor agrees to comply with all such requirements, including, but not limited to, mandatory vaccinations, the use of personal protective equipment (e.g. masks), physical distancing, and health screenings.

Contractor also agrees to make available to the City, at the City’s request, records to demonstrate Contractor’s compliance with this Section.

14. INSURANCE:

Insurance requirements are set forth in Exhibit F to this Contract. Contractor shall abide by the insurance requirements set forth in said Exhibit F.

15. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS:
a. During the term of this Contract, Contractor shall keep fully informed of all existing and future state and federal laws and all municipal ordinances and regulations of the City of Richmond which affect the manner in which the services or tasks are to be performed by Contractor, as well as all such orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over the same. Contractor shall comply with all applicable laws, state and federal and all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by the City. Compliance under this provision includes compliance with all provisions of the Richmond Municipal Code ("Municipal Code"), including Chapters 2.50,

2.52, 2.56, and 2.60, if applicable.
b. Contractor acknowledges that under § 2.60.070 of the Municipal Code ("Living Wage Ordinance"), Contractor is required to provide the City with documents and information verifying its compliance with the Living Wage Ordinance. Contractor shall notify each of its affected employees with regards to the wages that are required to be paid pursuant to the Living Wage Ordinance as prescribed in § 2.60.070 of the Municipal Code.

Moffatt & Nichol
554
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
c. Contractor shall comply with § 2.28.030 of the Municipal Code, obligating every Contractor or sub-Contractor under an agreement or sub-agreement with the City for public works, goods or services to refrain from discriminatory employment or practices on the basis of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religious creed, national origin or ancestry of any employee, any applicant for employment or any potential sub-contractor. d. Contractor acknowledges that the City’s Drug Free Workplace Policy, Violence in the Workplace Policy and the Policy Against Workplace Harassment, are available on the City’s website at http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/workplacepolicies.

Contractor agrees to abide by the terms and conditions of said policies.

16. INTEGRATED CONTRACT:

The Recitals and exhibits are a material part of this Contract and are expressly incorporated herein. This Contract represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof. Any modification of this Contract will be effective only by written execution signed by both the City and Contractor.

17. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS:

In the event of a conflict between these General Conditions and those of any Exhibit or attachment hereto, these General Conditions shall prevail; provided, however, that any Special Condition as set forth in Exhibit E shall prevail over these General Conditions. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more Exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by the Contractor, and the terms and conditions preferred by the City shall prevail over those preferred by the Contractor.

18. FORCE MAJEURE:

Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligations hereunder to the extent that the performance of such an obligation is prevented or delayed by reason of acts of God, strikes, boycotts, lock-outs, inability to procure materials not related to the price thereof, failure of power, restrictive governmental laws and regulations enacted after the date of this Contract, riots, civil unrest, acts of terrorism, insurrection, war, declaration of a state or national emergency or other reasons of a like nature not within the reasonable control of such party.

19. CONFLICT OF LAW:

This Contract shall be interpreted under, and enforced by the laws of the State of Moffatt & Nichol
555
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
California without regard to any choice of law rules which may direct the application of laws of another jurisdiction. The Contract and obligations of the parties are subject to all valid laws, orders, rules, and regulations of the authorities having jurisdiction over this Contract (or the successors of those authorities). Any suits brought pursuant to this Contract shall be filed with the courts of the County of Contra Costa, State of California.

20. CLAIMS:

Any claim by Contractor against City hereunder shall be subject to Government Code §§ 800 et seq. The claims presentation provisions of said Act are hereby modified such that the presentation of all claims hereunder to the City shall be waived if not made within six months after accrual of the cause of action.

21. INTERPRETATION:

This Contract shall be interpreted as if drafted by both parties.

22. WARRANTY:

If any product is be provided to the City as part of this Contract, Contractor warrants as follows: Contractor possesses good title to the product and the right to transfer the product to City; the product shall be delivered to the City free from any security interest or other lien; the product meets any specifications contained herein; the product shall be free from material defects in materials and workmanship under normal use for a period of one (1) year from the date of delivery; and the product shall be fit for its intended purpose(s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, consumable and maintenance items (such as light bulbs and batteries) shall be warranted for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date of delivery. All repairs during the warranty period shall be promptly performed by Contractor, at Contractor's expense, including shipping.

23. SEVERABILITY:

In the event that any of the provisions or portions or applications thereof of this Contract are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, City and Contractor shall negotiate an equitable adjustment in the provisions of the Contract with a view toward effecting the purpose of this Contract, and the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions or portions or applications thereof, shall not be affected thereby.

24. AUTHORITY:

City warrants and represents that the signatory hereto (the Mayor of the City of Richmond or the City Manager) is duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of City. The party signing on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that they are duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor, Moffatt & Nichol
556
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
and shall be personally liable to City if they are not duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor.

25. WAIVER:

The waiver by City of any breach of any term or provision of this Contract shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach. Inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the City relating to the Contractor’s performance, or payment therefore, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor’s obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the City be thereby stopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions of this Contract.

26. COUNTERPARTS:

This Contract may be executed in any number of counterparts (including by fax, PDF, DocuSign, or other electronic means), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

27. SANCTUARY CITY CONTRACTING ORDINANCE (SCCO):

The Richmond Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance No. 12-18 prohibits the City from granting and or retaining contracts with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor must submit the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement, attached hereto as Exhibit G.

Moffatt & Nichol
557
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT E

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The General Conditions are hereby amended to include the following modifications and/or provisions (if applicable, otherwise please state “NONE”):

Moffatt & Nichol
558
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT F

INSURANCE PROVISIONS
☐ CHECK HERE IF RISK MANAGEMENT HAS APPROVED WAIVING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS CONTRACT.

1. CERTIFICATES: Before the commencement of the terms of this Contract, and during the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, Contractor shall furnish the City’s Risk Manager with certificates showing the type, amount, class of operations covered, effective dates and dates of expiration of insurance coverage in compliance with coverage requirements set forth by the City and incorporated herein.

Such certificates, which do not limit Contractor’s indemnification, shall also contain substantially the following statement:
“Should any of the above insurance covered by this certificate be canceled or coverage reduced before the expiration date thereof, the insurer affording coverage shall provide thirty (30) days’ advance written notice to the City of Richmond.

Attention: Risk Manager.”
Contractor shall maintain in force at all times during the performance of this Contract all appropriate coverage of insurance required by this Contract with an insurance company licensed to offer insurance business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII or Standard & Poor’s Rating (if rated) of at least BBB unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Contractor shall deliver updated insurance certificates to the City at the address set forth in Exhibit C prior to the expiration of the existing insurance certificate for the duration of the term of Contract.

Endorsements naming the City, its City Council, boards, commissions, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insured shall be submitted with the insurance certificates.

2. COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS: The City’s insurance requirements depend upon the type of service being provided and/or the provider. The City’s insurance requirements will fall into one of the following categories (unless otherwise provided by the City):

Consultants and Contractors – Type 1
Professional Services – Type 2
Environmental Risk/Hazardous Waste Material – Type 3
Lease of City Property – Type 4
Vendors, Suppliers, Small Grant Recipients & Nonprofit Organizations – Type 5 Transportation Providers – Type 6
Professional Services Pyrotechnics – Type 7
Cyber and I.T. Risks – Type 8
Moffatt & Nichol
559
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
The insurance requirements classification applicable to this Contract shall be attached to this Exhibit F and made a part hereof.

3. FAILURE TO SECURE: If Contractor at any time during the term hereof should fail to secure or maintain the foregoing insurance, the City shall be permitted to obtain such insurance in Contractor’s name or as an agent of Contractor and shall be compensated by Contractor for the costs of the insurance premiums at the maximum rate permitted by law and computed from the date written notice is received that the premiums have not been paid.

4. SUFFICIENCY OF INSURANCE: The insurance limits required by the City are not represented as being sufficient to protect Contractor. Contractor is advised to consult Contractor’s insurance broker to determine adequate coverage for Contractor. The coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Contract; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of the coverage carried by or available to Contractor; whichever is greater.

INSERT INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS CLASSIFICATION APPLICABLE TO THIS CONTRACT: (IF NECESSARY, CONFIRM WITH RISK MANAGER)
Moffatt & Nichol
560
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:

Professional Services
Type 2 – Page 1 of 3
Revised: September 2011
In all instances where CONTRACTOR or its representatives will provide professional services (architects, engineers, construction management, counselors, medical professionals, hospitals, clinics, attorneys, consultants, accountants, etc.) to the City of Richmond (City), the City requires the following MINIMUM insurance requirements and limits.

CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract, agreement, or other order for work, services or supplies, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the contract. Failure to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of contract.

CONTRACTOR agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which it has agreed to provide Commercial General Liability insurance, CONTRACTOR shall look solely to its insurance for recovery.

CONTRACTOR hereby grants to CITY, on behalf of any insurer providing Commercial General Liability insurance to either CONTRACTOR or CITY with respect to the services of CONSULTANT herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said CONTRACTOR may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Original, signed certificates and original, separate policy endorsements, naming the City as an additional insured for general liability coverage, as well as a waiver of subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance, shall be received and approved by the City before any work may begin. However, failure to do so shall not operate as a waiver of these insurance requirements.

City reserves the right to modify or require additional coverages for specific risk exposures depending on scope of CONTRACTORS work.

Minimum coverage is detailed below. The policy limits of coverage shall be made available to the full limits of the policy. The minimum limits stated herein shall not serve to reduce the policy limits of coverage of CONTRACTOR.

Minimum Scope of Insurance – the following forms shall be provided and coverage shall be at least as broad as the following:

1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001), and including coverage for bodily and personal injury, property damage, and products and completed operations (if applicable).

2. Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability coverage (ISO Form CA 0001, Code 1, Any Auto).

3. Original and Separate Additional Insured Endorsement for General Liability (ISO Form CG 20 10 11/85 or its equivalent) with primary and non-contributory language.

4. Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California including Employer’s Liability coverage.

5. Original and Separate Waiver of Subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance.

6. Professional Liability or Errors & Omissions Liability Insurance appropriate to the CONTRACTOR’s profession (if required.)
Required Coverage Minimum Limits
Workers’ Compensation and
Employers’ Liability
Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1 million Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease.

If CONTRACTOR is self-insured, provide a certificate of Permission to SelfInsure, signed by the California Department of Industrial Relations and SelfInsurance. If contractor is a sole proprietor (has no employees) than contractor must sign “Contractor Release of Liability” found at:
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

General Liability
(primary and excess limits
combined)
$2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If the policy includes a general aggregate, either the general aggregate shall apply separately to this project, service or location or the minimum required aggregate limit shall be twice the per occurrence limit ($4 million aggregate limit).

Policy shall be endorsed to name the City of Richmond as an additional insured per the conditions detailed below.
561
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:

Professional Services
Type 2 – Page 2 of 3
Revised: September 2011
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.

PROJECT COST REQUIRED LIMIT
$0 - $1 million $1 million p/o
$1 million - $5 million $2 million p/o
Over $5 million $5 million p/o

Professional Liability or Errors &
Omissions Liability –
Required for all professionals
including architects, engineers,
consultants, construction
management, counselors, medical
professionals, hospitals, clinics,
attorneys and accountants, & other
consultants as may be required by
the City.

Required Policy Conditions
Additional Insured Endorsement Applicable to General Liability coverage.

The City of Richmond, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be named as additional insureds for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured including bodily injury, deaths and property damage or destruction arising in any respect directly or indirectly in the performance of this contract.

ISO form CG 20 10 (11/85) or its equivalent is required. If the Contractor is supplying their product or providing a service then the endorsement must not exclude products and completed operations coverage. If it does, then CG 20 37 (10/01) is also required.

SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

Primary and Noncontributory The contractor’s insurance coverage must be primary coverage as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by the City is wholly separate from the insurance of the contractor and in no way relieves the contractor from its responsibility to provide insurance.

Waiver of Subrogation
Endorsement Form
Contractor’s insurer will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for Workers’ Compensation Insurance during the life of this contract.

SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.

Deductibles and Self-Insured
Retentions
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City or the CONTRACTOR shall procure a financial guarantee in an amount equal to the deductible or self-insured retention guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

Contractor is responsible for satisfaction of the deductible and/or self-insured retention for each loss.

A. M. Best Rating A:VII or Better. If the A.M. Best Rating falls below the required rating, CONTRACTOR must replace coverage immediately and provide notice to City.

Umbrella/Excess Liability Policies
If an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy is used to meet the liability limits, coverage shall be as broad as specified for underlying coverage’s and cover those insured in the underlying policies. 562
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:

Professional Services
Type 2 – Page 3 of 3
Revised: September 2011
Claims-Made Policies
If any insurance policy is written on a claims-made form: 1) the retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 2) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 3) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase an extended period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.

Subcontractors
CONTRACTOR shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish to the City for review and approval, separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify the City of Richmond for any damage resulting to it from failure of either CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor to take out or maintain the required insurance policies. The fact that insurance is obtained by CONTRACTOR, and/or CONTRACTOR’s subcontractors, will not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of CONTRACTOR, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this contract. Damages recoverable by CITY from CONTRACTOR or any third party will not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage.

Verification of Coverage
All original certificates and endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work may begin.

The City of Richmond reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies including endorsements affecting the coverage at any time.

Original insurance certificates and required policy endorsements shall be mailed or delivered to the Designated Project Manager for the City of Richmond.

Insurance certificates and endorsements may be faxed to the Designated Project Manger. However, CONTRACTOR must mail the original certificates and endorsements to Designated Project Manager once faxed.

Continuous Coverage
CONTRACTOR shall maintain the required insurance for the life of the contract. Should the CONTRACTOR cease to have insurance as required during this time, all work by the CONTRACTOR pursuant to this agreement shall cease until insurance acceptable to the City is provided. In the event that CONTRACTOR fails to comply with the City’s insurance requirements, the City may take such action as it deems necessary to protect the City’s interests. Such action may include but is not limited to termination of the contract, withholding of payments, or other actions as the City deems appropriate.

If services or the scope of work extend beyond the expiration dates of the required insurance policies initially approved by the City, CONTRACTOR must provide updated certificates and endorsements indicating that the required coverage, terms and conditions are still in place. Renewal certificates and updated endorsements shall be mailed to the Designated Project Manager.

Cancellation
CONTRACTOR shall ensure that coverage shall not be cancelled, reduced or otherwise materially changed except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice has been given to the City.

Reporting Requirements
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

Consistent with Public Policy
The insuring provisions, insofar as they may be judged to be against public policy shall be void and unenforceable only to the minimum extent necessary so that the remaining terms and provisions herein may be consistent with public policy and thus enforceable.
563
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT G

SANCTUARY CITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
The undersigned, (hereafter "Contractor"), has had an opportunity to review the requirements of City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 (hereafter "Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance" or “SCCO”).

Contractor understands and agrees that the City may choose with whom it will maintain business relations and may refrain from contracting with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor understands the meaning of the following terms used in the SCCO:
a. "Data Broker” means either of the following:
i. The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector business and government agencies;
ii. The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose from that for which it is ultimately used.
b. “Extreme Vetting” means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar services."
Contractor understands that it is not eligible to receive or retain a City contract if at the time the Contract is executed, or at any time during the term of the Contract, it provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE.

Contractor further understands and agrees that Contractor's failure to comply with the SCCO shall constitute a material default of the Contract and the City Manager may terminate the Contract and bar Contractor from bidding on future contracts with the City for five (5) years from the effective date of the contract termination.

By executing this statement, Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of the SCCO and that if at any time during the term of the Contract it ceases to comply, Contractor will promptly notify the City Manager in writing. Any person or entity who knowingly or willingly supplies false information in violation of the SCCO shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a $1,000 fine.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Printed Name: Title:

Signed: Date:

Business Entity:

Moffatt & Nichol
564