Agenda — Roseville City Council, September 7, 2022 (part 5 of 6)

004 CS.INSIGHT.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE INSIGHT
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 0.00 0.00
005 CS.TG.STD.GOV.36M CROWDSTRIKE THREAT GRAPH STANDARD ON GOVCLOUD Line Note:
12 Months
2090 7.81 16,322.90
006 CS.OW.SVC.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE OVERWATCH
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 3.14 7,850.00
007 CS.FALXBP.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON X BUNDLE PROMO Line Note:
12 Months
2500 8.48 21,200.00
008 CS.DEVICEBP.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON DEVICE CONTROL BUNDLE PROMO Line Note:
12 Months
2500 0.81 2,025.00
009 CS.TG.STD.HPSGOV.36M CROWDSTRIKE SERVER THREAT GRAPH STANDARD ONGOVCLOUD Line Note:
12 Months
410 23.39 9,589.90
010 RR.HOS.ENT.EXPS.36M CROWDSTRIKE EXPRESS SUPPORT
Line Note:
12 Months
1 9,856.80 9,856.80
011 RR.PSO.ENT.NCAP.36M CROWDSTRIKE UNIVERSITY LMS SUBSCRIPTION NEWCUSTOMER

ACCESS PASS
Line Note:
12 Months
P 3Y 6 0.00 0.00
012 CS.DISC.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE DISCOVER
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 1.77 4,425.00
013 CS.SPOTLT.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON SPOTLIGHT
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 2.65 6,625.00
014 CS.EPPENT.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON ENDPOINT PROTECTION

ENTERPRISEFLEXIBLE BUNDLE
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 8.28 20,700.00
015 CS.FIREWBP.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON FIREWALL MANAGEMENT BUNDLEPROMO Line Note:
12 Months
2500 1.18 2,950.00
016 CS.PREVENT.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE PREVENT
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 0.00 0.00
017 CS.INSIGHT.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE INSIGHT 2500 0.00 0.00 Sub-Total (USD) 99,844.60
Year 2

Page 2 of 5 ends

Line Note:
12 Months
018 CS.OW.SVC.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE OVERWATCH
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 3.39 8,475.00
019 CS.FALXBP.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON X BUNDLE PROMO Line Note:
12 Months
2500 9.14 22,850.00
020 CS.TG.STD.GOV.36M CROWDSTRIKE THREAT GRAPH STANDARD ON GOVCLOUD Line Note:
12 Months
2090 8.41 17,576.90
021 CS.DEVICEBP.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON DEVICE CONTROL BUNDLE PROMO Line Note:
12 months
2500 0.87 2,175.00
022 CS.TG.STD.HPSGOV.36M CROWDSTRIKE SERVER THREAT GRAPH STANDARD ONGOVCLOUD Line Note:
12 Months
410 25.21 10,336.10
023 RR.HOS.ENT.EXPS.36M CROWDSTRIKE EXPRESS SUPPORT
Line Note:
12 Months
1 10,621.55 10,621.55
024 RR.PSO.ENT.NCAP.36M CROWDSTRIKE UNIVERSITY LMS SUBSCRIPTION NEWCUSTOMER

ACCESS PASS
Line Note:
12 Months
6 0.00 0.00
025 CS.DISC.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE DISCOVER
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 1.91 4,775.00
026 CS.SPOTLT.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON SPOTLIGHT
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 2.86 7,150.00
027 CS.EPPENT.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON ENDPOINT PROTECTION

ENTERPRISEFLEXIBLE BUNDLE
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 8.35 20,875.00
028 CS.FIREWBP.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON FIREWALL MANAGEMENT BUNDLEPROMO Line Note:
12 Months
2500 1.19 2,975.00
029 CS.PREVENT.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE PREVENT
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 0.00 0.00
030 CS.INSIGHT.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE INSIGHT
Line Note:
2500 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total (USD) 107,609.55
Year 3

Page 3 of 5 ends

Totals 315,992.56
Sub Total (USD): 315,992.56
Est. Tax (USD): TBD if Applicable
Shp&Hnd (USD): TBD
Total (USD): 315,992.56
By placing an order with ePlus for products or services you agree to comply with the City of Roseville Terms and Conditions of Purchase (rev 5/3/18 as attached). Unless there is a separate written agreement signed on behalf of both you and ePlus by a duly authorized officer, the Order Terms shall be the only terms and conditions applicable to transactions between you and ePlus, and no additional or contrary terms referenced in a purchase order, document, or electronic communication shall apply. In no event shall ePlus performance under a purchase order be deemed to constitute acceptance of any terms and conditions set forth therein. ePlus offers flexible and easy leasing options for your IT equipment. Use leasing to increase your IT acquisition capability, overcome limited budgets, and manage the lifecycle of your assets. Contact an ePlus Leasing Coordinator at 1-703-984-8021 or [email protected] to receive a lease quote today. 12 Months
031 CS.TG.STD.GOV.36M CROWDSTRIKE THREAT GRAPH STANDARD ON GOVCLOUD Line Note:
12 Months
2090 8.48 17,723.20
032 CS.OW.SVC.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE OVERWATCH
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 3.42 8,550.00
033 CS.FALXBP.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON X BUNDLE PROMO Line Note:
12 months
2500 9.22 23,050.00
034 CS.DEVICEBP.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON DEVICE CONTROL BUNDLE PROMO Line Note:
12 Months
2500 0.88 2,200.00
035 CS.TG.STD.HPSGOV.36M CROWDSTRIKE SERVER THREAT GRAPH STANDARD ONGOVCLOUD Line Note:
12 Months
410 25.43 10,426.30
036 RR.HOS.ENT.EXPS.36M CROWDSTRIKE EXPRESS SUPPORT
Line Note:
12 Months
1 10,713.91 10,713.91
037 RR.PSO.ENT.NCAP.36M CROWDSTRIKE UNIVERSITY LMS SUBSCRIPTION NEWCUSTOMER

ACCESS PASS
Line Note:
12 Months
6 0.00 0.00
038 CS.DISC.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE DISCOVER
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 1.93 4,825.00
039 CS.SPOTLT.SOLN.T9.36M CROWDSTRIKE FALCON SPOTLIGHT
Line Note:
12 Months
2500 2.88 7,200.00
Sub-Total (USD) 108,538.41

Page 4 of 5 ends

Customer Acceptance Bill To Ship To
Signature: ____________________________________
Name: _______________________________________
Title: _________________________________________
Date: ________________________________________
Customer PO #: _______________________________

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON ST
FINANCE- 1ST FLOOR
ROSEVILLE CA 95678

UNITED STATES

ACCOUNT PAYABLE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON ST
Information Technology
ROSEVILLE CA 95678

UNITED STATES
©2022 ePlus inc. All rights reserved.
*NGDC P1 3.7.3.5

Page 5 of 5 ends

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2281
File #: 0800-03
Title:

Managed Relay Utility Interactive Voice Response System - Contract Purchase Agreement
Contact: Andrea Blomquist 916-774-5317 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.9.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a fouryear contract purchase agreement with Selectron Technologies, Inc. for a Managed Relay Utility Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system.

BACKGROUND
Selectron Technologies, Inc. currently provides the City of Roseville Utility Billing division with an IVR system which assists in providing services to our utility customers. These services include an automated phone system where customers can receive utility account information and make payments via credit card or e-check, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. In addition to customer initiated services, the IVR system also provides delinquent utility account notification in the form of automated customer calls. These outgoing calls provide a relied upon service for our customers that may be pending service interruption due to non-payment of their utility account.

This four-year contract moves our current IVR from an on-premise server to a hosted environment with Selectron Technologies. This will free up valuable City resources, provide multiple levels of redundancy and failover, and provide 24 hour system support and monitoring.

This contract utilizes GSA contract GS-35F-0315X which expires in June 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of the four-year contract is $448,432.65. Funding for the first year of the contract of $112,108.16 is included in the FY2022-23 Utility Billing budget in the Electric and Environmental Utilities funds. Future funding will be contingent on the approval of the respective annual budgets.

There is no impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Deliver exceptional city services and invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth.

Respectfully Submitted,
Andrea Blomquist, Utility Billing Operations Manager
Dan Beans, Electric Utility Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-337
Contract PurchaseAgreement
RESOLUTION NO. 22-337

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SELECTRON TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3002451), for the Managed Relay Utility Interactive Voice Response System used by the Utility Billing department, by and between the City of Roseville and Selectron Technologies Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said contract purchase agreement is approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
Contract Purchase Agreement 3002451
Supplier Details:

Company Selectron Technologies Inc
Contact Tyler Lloyd
Address 12323 Sw 66th Avenue
Portland, OR 97223
Submit your response to:

Company City of Roseville
Contact "Becky" Rebecca Philipp
Address Purchasing Division
2075 Hilltop Circle
Roseville, CA 95747
Phone (916) 774-5724
Fax (916) 774-5736
E-mail [email protected]
This Contract Purchase Agreement is sent for your review and acceptance. Notify the Buyer via email of any needed changes to the company name, address, and contact information. The Buyer will update the agreement prior to you signing the document.

Return signed copies of the agreement to the Buyer noted on the agreement. Alterations or modifications to the agreement are not allowed. Upon receipt of all necessary documents, the City will sign the agreement and return a fully executed copy to you. Receipt of the signed copy will be your notice to proceed with the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Work must not begin until the contract has been fully executed.

The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:

Insurance requirements:

The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002451
Agreement 3002451
Agreement Date 01-AUG-2022
Revision 0
Agreement Amount 448,432.65 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier Selectron Technologies Inc
12323 Sw 66th Avenue
Portland, OR 97223
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(503) 597-3316
()
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials

VENDOR SHALL PROVIDE ITS RELAY PLATFORM AND MAINTENANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED SELECTRON TECHNOLOGIES INC. LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING AND ATTACHMENTS A-E THERETO, DATED 6/17/22 UTILIZING GSA CONTRACT GS-35F-0315X.

START DATE: UPON EXECUTED AGREEMENT
END DATE: 6/30/26
PLEASE CONTACT EMILY SAWING IN UTILITY BILLING AT (916)774-5388 OR [email protected] FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS AGREEMENT. *The total agreement amount is an approximation only. The City does not guarantee whatsoever the actual value of this contract.

Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 11178 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
"Becky" Rebecca Philipp Phone 1-916-774-5724
Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office. 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002451
Contract Terms and Conditions

1. These Contract Terms and Conditions supplement the Letter of Understanding entered into between the parties, attached hereto (the "LOU"). Together, these Contract Terms and Conditions, the LOU, and all attachments to the LOU, are referred to as the "Agreement." In the event that the terms of these Contract Terms and Conditions conflict with any other terms of this agreement, the order of precedence laid out in the LOU will apply.

To the fullest extent allowed by law, each party shall indemnify anddefend the other party, and the other party's officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, costs or liability that arise out of, or pertain to, or relate to the negligence, or willful misconduct of the indemnifying party or its agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this indemnity does not apply to the extent the liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other loss, arose solely due to negligence or willful misconduct by the indemnified party or the agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the indemnified party,, or arising solely from the active negligence of the indemnified party. Each party's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

2. Consultant is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an officer, agent or employee of the City.

3. Without the written consent of the City, this Agreement is not assignable by Consultant either in whole or in part.

4. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

5. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City has the right to terminate this Agreement, provided Consultant is given thirty (30) days written notice. Consultant acknowledges that City may terminate this Agreement should funds not be appropriated by its governing body to continue services under this Agreement; provided, however, that City considers the Software and Services to constitute essential services, and accordingly at all time during the Term will use its best efforts to obtain and maintain all necessary appropriations for payment of the Fees.

6. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing. This Agreement, and all attachments thereto, including the Letter of Understanding and Master Service and Hosting Agreement between the parties, is integrated and contains the complete understanding of the parties.

7. All equipment, supplies and services sold to the City of Roseville shall conform to the general safety orders of the State of California.

8. Unless notified to the contrary, in writing, the City assumes that the Consultant has accepted the work in accordance with the plans and specifications (if any) and agrees to do the work in compliance with this Agreement. Any work product created for City pursuant to this Agreement is deemed owned by City.

9. All prevailing wages and fair employment practices must be adhered to. For prevailing wage contracts over $25,000, copies of certified payroll must be submitted with invoices. Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address:
3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002451
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm

10. Consultant agrees to the below insurance requirements:
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Consultant shall maintain the policies of insurance outlined in Attachment A, incorporated herein by this reference, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. The City of Roseville retains sole discretion in determining the types and proper levels of insurance coverage. b. Form. Consultant shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. c. Additional Insureds. Consultant shall also provide a separate endorsement or section of the policy showing City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of Consultant.

Furthermore, Consultant shall require its subconsultants to agree to be bound to Consultant and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Consultant is bound to City under this Agreement. Additionally, Consultant shall obligate its subconsultants to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subconsultant, regardless of tier. A copy of City's indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subconsultant or tertiary subconsultant upon request.
g. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
h. Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002451
of Consultant may acquire from Consultant by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy.

All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by Consultant, its employees, agents and sub consultants.
i. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Consultant of liability in excess of such coverage, if and to the extent the limitations on liability in this contract provide such so much liability nor shall it preclude City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

11. Consultant shall comply with all federal, state, local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.

12. This section is intentionally left blank.

13. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e-mail delivery of a ". pdf" format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf" signature page were an original thereof.

14. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

15. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

16. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

17. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms "Contractor," "Consultant," and "Supplier" are used interchangeably.

18. This section is intentionally left blank.

19. All facilities, devices, networks and services used to store, deliver, process, backup or purge Proprietary Information (as defined in the Master Services and Hosting Agreement) will employ administrative, physical, technical, and procedural safeguards and best no less protective than those used to secure Consultant's own information of a similar type, and in no event less than reasonable in view of the type and nature of the information involved. It is the City's expectation that Consultant, at its own expense, shall perform annual audits for any data centers that house Proprietay Information, using an independent third-party audit that meets industry standards applicable to the services under this Agreement, and provide the audit report or certification upon request to City.

20. Consultant will retain Confidential Information until deleted by City or City-authorized third party, or for a time period mutually agreed upon by the parties to this Agreement. 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002451

21. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, Consultant will ensure that all Confidential Information is securely transferred to City within thirty (30) calendar days. Consultant will ensure that any transfer of Confidential Information is accomplished by methods that are compatible with the relevant City systems, and that City will have access to all Confidential Information during any such transfer. Consultant shall securely dispose of all Confidential Information when requested by City and Consultant will provide written notification to City once all Confidential Information has been securely disposed of.

22. This section is intentionally left blank.

23. This section is intentionally left blank.

24. Consultant acknowledges that services rendered under this agreement shall be performed in accordance with industry standards.

25. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations.

Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

26. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: Contractor must submit all claims as defined in and in accordance with the claim resolution process set forth in Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code. Each such claim must be sent to the City by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested and must contain reasonable documentation to support the claim. All claims must be received prior to acceptance of the work.

27. Consultant certifies that Consultant, its employees, directors, officers, agents, subcontractors, vendors, and volunteers are not presently debarred, excluded, suspended, declared ineligible, voluntarily excluded, or proposed for debarment, exclusion, suspension or ineligibility by any federal, state, or local department or agency.

28. This Agreement may be amended via change order, but only if such change order is made in writing, approved by the City, and signed by both parties.

29. CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY's on-call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.
6 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002451
The supplier named hereon by the acceptance of this order agrees to the provisions of this document titled "Contract Purchase Agreement" and all accompanying terms, conditions, and attachments.

Roseville Business License No. ____________________________________ Contractor License No. ____________________________________________ DIR Registration No. _______________________________________________ Check mark the applicable company type below:
___________ Corporation
___________ Limited Liability Company
___________ Partnership
___________ Sole Proprietor
City reserves the right to withhold any payments to Consultant in the event of noncompliance with insurance requirements or if required by law.

Information Technology T&C Negotiated for Selectron Technologies REV 7/29/22 JS
7 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 N/A
N/A
X
n/a
Contract Purchase Agreement 3002451

ATTACHMENT A

HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

AGREEMENT OVER FORMAL BID LIMIT OR INVOLVING HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES General - Required Coverage/Documentation
● General Liability: $1 Million per occurrence /$2 Million aggregate ● Automobile Liability: $1 Million combined single limit ● Workers' Compensation: Statutory *Must provide a Waiver of subrogation ● Additional Insured Endorsement (AIE) - General Liability policy: CG 20 38 04 13 or an equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy. Endorsement shall cover the City of Roseville, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insured. ● Policies must be primary and non-contributory
● A 30 day notice of cancellation must be provided
● List certificate holder as: The City of Roseville - Insurance Compliance, PO Box 100085-R1, Duluth, GA 30096
Additional Liability/Insurance Requirements if required by Agreement (and marked below):

Construction:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Design Professional:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Professional Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
Professional Consultant:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
IT Services:__X__
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Cyber Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Hazardous Materials:____
Pollution Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Special Events/Caterers-Vendors:____
No auto required
No workers' comp required
Professional Counseling/ Psychological:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
8 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002451
Pyrotechnics:____
General Liability:
$5 Million/occurrence
$10 Million aggregate
Auto - $2 Million/occurrence
Chemical/Environmental:____
General Liability:
$3 Million/occurrence
$6 Million aggregate
Pollution – $2 Million/Occurrence
Auto - $2 Million/Occurrence
Insurance Submission Process
The City of Roseville Human Resources/Risk Management Department uses a service called EBIX to manage our insurance certificate tracking.

How It Works
● The vendor's contact information is entered into EBIX. EBIX will contact the vendor to request proof of insurance.
● The Vendor can forward the request to their Insurance Agent(s) if necessary. ● Vendor/Insurance Agent submits insurance to EBIX by email to [email protected] or by fax to (770) 325-5727. After faxing or emailing the certificate, please DO NOT send the certificate by mail to EBIX.

Please do not mail, email or fax any certificates to the City of Roseville. ● Once submitted, EBIX reviews the insurance documentation. If there are deficiencies, EBIX will send a follow up letter or email requesting additional information.

Questions Regarding Insurance Submission: Contact EBIX at (951) 652-4239 Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202 9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002451
10 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Secretary
President
Todd Johnston
Stefanie Johnston
June 17, 2022
Andrea Blomquist
Utility Billing Operations Manager
Roseville Electric Utility – Utility Billing
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Dear Ms. Blomquist,
This letter is intended to be a letter of understanding between the City and Selectron Technologies, Inc., regarding the Scope of Work and for the implementation of your Selectron system.

As accepted by the City below, this will constitute acceptance of the items within this letter, the enclosed Statement of Work and the terms and conditions currently in effect. If there is a conflict with a term within these documents, the order of precedence will be:
• Letter of Understanding
• Scope of Work starting on page 2 of this letter
• Statement of Work starting on page 6 of thisletter, including the Master Services and Hosting Agreement included therein.
• Support and Maintenance Agreement dated June 22, 2016 • Software License Agreement dated August 5, 2015
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely,
Todd A. Johnston
President and CEO
Accepted By:

Authorized Representative
Date Accepted:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Exhibit A: Scope of Work
GSA Contract # GS-35F-0315X
GSA PRICING: 4-YEAR CONTRACT TERM SUMMARY
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 TOTAL
SIN 511210,
Part # PP-SM:
*PremierPro Support &
Maintenance
$27,375.00 $27,375.00 $27,375.00 $27,375.00 $109,500.00 SIN 54151S,
Part # PS-WSSLS:

Standard Labor Rate
with Active Support
$87,607.73 $87,607.73 $87,607.73 $87,607.73 $350,430.92 SUB-TOTAL $114,982.73 $114,982.73 $114,982.73 $114,982.73 $459,930.92

2.5% GSA Volume
Discount $2,874.57 $2,874.57 $2,874.57 $2,874.57 $11,498.27 GRAND TOTAL $112,108.16 $112,108.16 $112,108.16 $112,108.16 $448,432.65 *Based on system value of $168,255

GSA PRICING DETAILS
Year 1: SIN 511210
Part # Description Quantity NET GSA EXT GSA Price
PP-SM PremierPro Support & Maintenance 1 $27,375.00 $27,375.00 Year 1: SIN 54151S
Part # Description Quantity NET GSA EXT GSA Price
PS-WSSLS Standard Labor Rate with Active Support 523 $167.51 $87,607.73 YEAR 1 GSA TOTAL $114,982.73
GSA 2.5% Discount -$2,874.57
YEAR 1 GSA TOTAL AFTER DISCOUNT $112,108.16
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Year 2: SIN 511210
Part # Description Quantity NET GSA Rate EXT GSA Price
PP-SM PremierPro Support & Maintenance 1 $27,375.00 $27,375.00 Year 2: SIN 54151S
Part # Description Quantity NET GSA EXT GSA Price
PS-WSSLS Standard Labor Rate with Active Support 523 $167.51 $87,607.73 YEAR 2 GSA TOTAL $114,982.73
GSA 2.5% Discount -$2,874.57
YEAR 2 GSA TOTAL AFTER DISCOUNT $112,108.16
Year 3: SIN 511210
Part # Description Quantity NET GSA EXT GSA Price
PP-SM PremierPro Support & Maintenance 1 $27,375.00 $27,375.00 Year 3: SIN 54151S
Part # Description Quantity NET GSA EXT GSA Price
PS-WSSLS Standard Labor Rate with Active Support 523 $167.51 $87,607.73 YEAR 3 GSA TOTAL $114,982.73
GSA 2.5% Discount -$2,874.57
YEAR 3 GSA TOTAL AFTER DISCOUNT $112,108.16
Year 4: SIN 511210
Part # Description Quantity NET GSA EXT GSA Price
PP-SM PremierPro Support & Maintenance 1 $27,375.00 $27,375.00 Year 4: SIN 54151S
Part # Description Quantity NET GSA EXT GSA Price
PS-WSSLS Standard Labor Rate with Active Support 523 $167.51 $87,607.73 YEAR 4 GSA TOTAL $114,982.73
GSA 2.5% Discount -$2,874.57
YEAR 4 GSA TOTAL AFTER DISCOUNT $112,108.16
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Required Items Not Included with Relay
• Required Existing Cayenta API
• Relay does not include merchant account provider or payment gateway costs or associatedfees Project Scope:
• Environment: Move both the Production and Test Utility IVR and Outbound systems from onpremise to Selectron’s managed/hosted environment. • Software: Update both IVR and Outbound from Gen4 to Relay Move both the Production and Test Utility IVR and Outbound systems from on-premise to Selectron’s managed/hosted environment.
• Application Database Integration: Existing Harris Cayenta; Integration to Cayenta requires appropriate ports enabled within the City of Roseville’s network and VPN connectivity, as determined is necessary during the system implementation. • Payment Gateway Vendor: No changes to existing Invoice Cloud payment gateway integration for credit card and e-check payments.
• Number of IVR Ports: 18 for Production and 2 for Test. • Telephone Number: The City would like to retain the existing IVR PhoneNumber. • Relay Outbound:
 Relay Outbound: supports delivery of phone calls, emails, and/or SMS text messages to recipients. Messages are split into two components: campaigns designating who and when to contact, with templates determining the specific messaging and data present in a message.
 Template Builder: allows users with permission to build their own message templates with dynamic data elements for delivery. Data for Agency-Built Templates will be supplied via flat file (see below) and do not directly integrate with the client's applicationdatabase. o Template Builder Training: these hours can be used by the Agency to get additional training from Selectron staff on the template buildertool. o Template Builder Professional Services: these hours can be used by the Agency to get hands-on assistance from Selectron staff on creating Agency-Built Templates using the Template Builder.
 Selectron-Built Template: Rich template created by Selectron that utilizes dynamic information that is accessed through a real-time interface with the client's application database. Scope includes the following 2 existing campaigns:
o Delinquency Notification
o Final Notice Notification
 Smart Transfers: Allows a call recipient to request a transfer to the agency's hosted Selectron IVR in order to make a payment. Data is carried over with this transfer, allowing the user to make a payment without having to re-enter their accountinformation.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

MANAGED SERVICES PAYMENT TERMS
Pricing does not include additional application integration charges that may be required as part of this solution. This includes Application Vendor API, user, or implementation fees, additional licensing fees, or other surcharges directly or indirectly charged by or remitted to the Application Vendor.

Payment Schedule: Year 1
55% Invoiced when delivered for User Acceptance Testing (UAT) 45% Invoiced upon go-live of the system or 60 days after delivery of system for UAT, whichever occurs first
Payment Schedule: Years 2++
100% Invoiced 45 days prior to start of next service year 4-Year Universal Message Bundle Covers:
• Inbound calls to the IVR and transfers from the IVR to Roseville staff A Call is defined as a successful completed connection. A Call can be up to 4 minutes in length, with each additional 4-minute period counted as an additional Call. When a caller initiates a transfer from the IVR, this results in an additional Call being counted.

Transfers from Relay Outbound to the IVR counts as additional inbound calls. • Relay Outbound messages (calls, text messages, emails) • Roseville’s Universal Message Bundle includes 2,400,000 calls/transfers/messages. o Bundle Start Date: Date when the Managed IVR is delivered to the City fortesting o Bundle Expiration Date: Upon completion of 4 service years • If the City exceeds the total of 2,400,000 calls/transfers/messages, then an overage charge of $0.20 per call/transfer/message in excess of 2,400,000 will be billed monthly to the City.

Taxes
Sales Tax or any other applicable taxes are not included in any of the pricing in this agreement. All applicable taxes will be invoiced, collected and remitted in accordance with state and local tax laws.

Payment Terms
Terms are net 30 from date of invoice. Past due invoices are subject to a 1.5% per month late fee. All presented pricing is in US Dollars.

Vendor Information
Selectron Technologies, Inc.
12323 SW 66th Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97223
Phone: 866.878.0048 | Fax: 503.443.2052
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Statement of Work
Roseville, CA
Relay
Utility

1. Overview.............................................................................................2

1.1. Revision History.................................................................................................... 2

2. Functionality .......................................................................................3

2.1. The Relay Platform............................................................................................... 3

2.2. Utility Pack............................................................................................................ 3

2.3. Relay Outbound.................................................................................................... 4

2.4. Payment Processing ..............................................................................................5

2.5. Languages..............................................................................................................6

3. System Integration..............................................................................6

3.1. Application Database Interfaces.......................................................................... 6

3.2. Payment Gateway Interfaces............................................................................... 7

4. Deployment Model .............................................................................7

4.1. Hosted IVR Access................................................................................................ 7

5. Administrative Tasks...........................................................................7

5.1. Run System Reports............................................................................................. 8

5.2. Schedule Outbound Campaigns........................................................................... 8

6. Responsibilities...................................................................................8

6.1. Selectron Technologies, Inc.................................................................................. 8

6.2. Roseville, CA ....................................................................................................... 10 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

1. Overview
This Statement of Work (SOW) outlines the services provided by Selectron Technologies, Inc. (Selectron) to Roseville, CA (Roseville or Customer). The features, functionality, and services are provided by upgrading Roseville’s existing Selectron Technologies’ solution to the next-generation Relay communication platform (Relay).

1.1. Revision History
Version # Details Date

1.0 Initial Release 06/29/2021

2.0 Changed to 4-Year Term GSA 05/24/2022
May 24, 2022 Page 2 of 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

2. Functionality
This section details the functionality of each application included in Roseville’s solution. All functions and features are dependent upon the accessibility of Roseville’s Harris Cayenta CIS application database to provide the given data to Relay.

2.1. The Relay Platform
Roseville’s solution will be upgraded to Selectron’s Relay platform. Relay is a multichannel, multi-agency platform that is designed to connect customers, constituents, and field workers to government agencies and utilities. Relay offers interactive voice response (IVR), web, mobile, outbound, call center agent, and field worker capabilities all in a single platform.

The following sections detail the functionality that will be implemented for Roseville.

Additional channels, applications, and integrations that are not specified in this SOW are not included, but may be able to be added to the system under a supplemental statement of work. Please contact your Selectron representative for more details for additional functionality.

2.1.1. Application Packs and Channels
Roseville’s solution includes the following application pack and channels:
• Application packs:
o Utility Pack
• Channels:
o IVR
o Outbound

2.2. Utility Pack
Roseville will be configured with the Utility Pack in order to provide all existing functionality available with Roseville’s current on-premise IVR and Outbound solutions.

The Utility Pack offers Roseville’s customers with a central point of access for account management and payments. Citizens will be able to enter an account number and access account data and activities, including:
• Current balance owed
• Last billing date and amount (up to last 6)
• Last payment date and amount (up to last6)
• Next payment due date
• Payment Processing – Credit Card and E-Check
June 29, 2021 Page 3 of 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 All account information is made available through an API to the Harris Cayenta CIS application database. For any of the features detailed below to function as described, data must be available in this database to be presented to users.

2.2.1. IVR Channel
The IVR Channel for the Utility Pack provides callers with an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system for accessing account information and making payments over the phone.

Citizens can call the Utility IVR channel in order to hear account information and to make a payment. Citizens will access their account using an account number. The IVR validates this data against the Harris Cayenta CIS application database. Once the account is validated, the IVR will speak the service address, followed by the current balance owed and due date. During the kickoff phase of the implementation project, Selectron and Roseville will need to determine the exact terminology and methodology around presenting ‘current’ and ‘delinquent’ amount due to the user. The caller will then be given the option of making a payment. If no payment is due, then the IVR will speak that there is currently no payment due.

Using the IVR, callers will also be presented with other options, as listed under Utility Pack, above.

Callers will also be able to transfer to an agent. If a caller requests a transfer, the IVR performs a transfer to a number specified by Roseville.

2.3. Relay Outbound
Relay Outbound provides Roseville with a multi-channel outbound communication platform capable of sending voice, SMS, and email messages to citizens. Messages can be configured to include dynamic account data designed to be sent to specific recipients, or can be designed as ‘general information’ messages without customerspecific data. These outbound messages can be designed and configured by Roseville staff using the Relay Portal. Customer-configured voice messages will be spoken to message recipients using computerized text-to-speech.

In addition to the above customer-configured messages, Selectron will design certain message templates during the implementation process. Selectron-created templates will be use professional voice recording for voice messages as opposed to computerized text-to-speech. This project includes the Selectron-built Bill Delinquency Notification as described in the following section.

June 29, 2021 Page 4 of 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

2.3.1. Bill DelinquencyNotification
The Delinquency Notification is used to warn citizens that their account is delinquent. It includes the following customer-specific data: account number, delinquent amount, and due date.

2.3.2. Final NoticeNotification
The Final Notice Notification is used to alert citizens that their Utility service will be shut off without any further communication. It presents the following customer-specific data: account number, delinquent amount, due date, and shutoff date.

2.3.3. Static Notifications
Roseville will be able to send Customer-defined static notifications to citizens via phone, email, or SMS text. Roseville is responsible for defining and configuring these notifications, which can be done via the Relay Portal. Training for configuring and recording static notifications will be provided at the end of the implementation process.

2.4. Payment Processing
The Relay solution can be configured to accept credit card and e-check payments, allowing citizens to make payments. The payment processing engine is a PA-DSSVerified payment system that does not retain any payment information. Users will need to enter their payment information for each transaction.

The Relay payment application interacts with Roseville’s selected payment gateway to provide payment functionality. Users will need to authenticate and provide valid payment information in order to make a payment. Relay validates the user’s payment information before passing it to the payment gateway. When a payment is reported as successful, Relay will post an update to Roseville’s Harris Cayenta CIS application database in real time (as long as an API for such an update is available).

Roseville will be able to take payments from citizens via the following payment methods:
• Credit Card
• E-Check

2.4.1. Credit Card
The interactive solution accepts Visa®, MasterCard®, Discover®, and American Express®.

Roseville can elect to accept all or a subset of these card types. Any credit card types not accepted by Roseville will not be accepted by the solution. When taking a payment, Relay verifies the credit card number and expiration date. For more security, Roseville June 29, 2021 Page 5 of 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 can choose to verify the card holder’s zip code and/or security code. All credit card transactions are sent through the designated payment gateway.

2.4.2. E-Check
Users wishing to pay via E-Check will need to enter their bank routing number and bank account number. All E-Check transactions are sent through the designated payment gateway.

2.5. Languages
The Customer’s Relay application will be configured to support English and the following other language(s):
• Spanish
The additional language module(s) enables the solution to support non-English-language users. Additionally, all dates, numbers, ordinals, currencies, and letters are translated (and voice recorded) to the proper language.

The professionally-recorded prompts use a vocabulary and dialect predetermined by Selectron. Additions and changes to the prompts to account for regional differences are subject to time and materials billing.

Roseville will be able to define a transfer destination for each language available on the IVR.

3. System Integration
Depending on the implemented features, Relay requires varying levels of integration with other Roseville components. These are described in the following sections.

3.1. Application Database Interfaces
It is anticipated that Selectron will be integrating with Roseville’s Harris Cayenta CIS application database. All data-based interactivity on the solution is reliant upon data being available via the application vendor APIs.

During the implementation phase, if data elements are identified as necessary but are not available via the included APIs, the project will be impacted. This may affect the implementation timeframe and will result in additional professional services fees.

June 29, 2021 Page 6 of 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

3.2. Payment Gateway Interfaces
For payment processing, Relay will be integrating to Invoice Cloud. The payment processing service is PA-DSS validated. Integration to the payment gateway initiates the collection and reconciliation of the payments being gathered by the department. It is required that the payment gateway be on the list of Selectron-certified payment gateways and that it integrates utilizing a REST/Web Service implementation.

The following payment processing fees and services are not covered by the purchase of the application:
• Transaction fees
• Merchant accounts
• Third-party payment processing services, fees, andsoftware

4. Deployment Model
Roseville’s Relay solution will be moved to Selectron’s single-tenant Relay Managed Services environment.

Relay Managed Services is a single-tenant hosted application, located in Selectron’s local hosting facility. Selectron’s hosting facility is a co-located data center featuring keyed entry and individual server locks for security. With a Managed Services solution, Selectron owns all hardware and is responsible for security, ongoing maintenance, and proactive support.

Roseville’s solution is licensed for:
• Eighteen (18) inbound IVR ports allowing for up to eighteen concurrentcalls • Two (2) port testserver
• 2,400,000 universal message bundle (includes inbound calls, outbound messagesand transfers) for four-year period, billed annually

4.1. Hosted IVR Access
For optimal user experience and telecom usage, it is recommended that callers access the hosted IVR by dialing directly into the hosted solution using a local Roseville 10-digit number, which will be provided by Selectron. If Roseville elects to have calls routed through your phone system first before connecting to the IVR, two customer telecom channels may be tied up during the duration of the entire call, and callers may experience a decrease in call quality.

5. Administrative Tasks
This section details administrative tasks that can be performed in order to manage Relay. All system administration for Relay is handled through the Relay Portal web application. An administrator from June 29, 2021 Page 7 of 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Roseville will be provided with user credentials for the Relay Portal application during the implementation process. Additional users can be created by the administrator as needed.

Permissions can be assigned on a per-user basis; permissions govern the functionality available to a given user.

The Relay Portal provides Roseville administrators with a single platform for viewing system usage and health, running reports, and configuring various system settings. The Relay Portal is supported on Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Safari.

5.1. Run System Reports
Roseville administrators will be able to run system reports via the Relay Portal. Reports that can be run by the administrator include:
• Payments
• Call Statistics
• Call Activity
• Call Detail
• Outbound Statistics

5.2. Schedule OutboundCampaigns
Using the Relay Portal, administrators can create, edit, and review outbound campaigns made using Relay Outbound. Each instance of an outbound campaign must be scheduled individually. This includes selecting the type of notification, the date/time of delivery, and (for static notifications) the configuration of the message.

The administrator will also need to upload a contact list in .csv format for the notification. The exact formatting of the .csv file will vary depending on the notification being scheduled. Selectron will provide Roseville with example .csv files for the configured notifications included in this project, as well as assistance in generating the outbound call list.

6. Responsibilities

6.1. Selectron Technologies,Inc.

This section outlines Selectron Technologies’ responsibilities regarding service initiation and operation.

6.1.1. Provide Project Management
Selectron Technologies assigns a Project Manager to the service implementation. The Project Manager is the Customer’s primary contact at Selectron Technologies and coordinates all necessary communication and resources.

June 29, 2021 Page 8 of 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

6.1.2. Provide Documentation
The Project Manager provides the Customer with the following documents to help facilitate the service implementation process:
• Implementation Questionnaire- gathers critical information needed to setup and initiate the service. This includes information on the toll-free numbers, call volume, APIs, accountvalidation information, and the types of payments being gathered.
• Remote Access Questionnaire- details information needed by Selectron Technologies to remotely access the Customer’s network and application database, prior to system initiation, to allow for complete system testing. • Implementation Timetable- details project schedule and allproject milestones.
• Quality Assurance Test Plan- assists the Customer in determining thatthe interactive solution is functioning as specified in theContract. • Service Acceptance Sign-off Form- indicates that the Customer hasverified service functionality.

6.1.2.1. Develop Channel Design
The Project Manager works with the Customer to develop and complete the following portions of channel design:
• IVR call flow design
• Outbound messaging configuration
Software development cannot begin until these design elements are completed and approved by the Customer.

6.1.3. Perform Quality AssuranceTesting
Selectron Technologies thoroughly tests all applications and integration points prior to initiation, ensuring system functionality. This includes data read from and written to the application database and the general ability for a customer to successfully access live data and complete a transaction.

6.1.4. Provide Installation and AdministrativeTraining
Selectron will provide remote training for the Relay solution. All installation is handled by Selectron technical staff at our remote hosting facility.

6.1.5. Provide Marketing Materials
Selectron Technologies provides marketing collateral that the Customer can use to promote the interactive solution to citizens. Marketing collateral includes a poster, triJune 29, 2021 Page 9 of 12 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 fold brochure, and business card; standard templates for each item are used. Collateral is provided to the Customer in PDF format (original Adobe InDesign files are provided upon request).

Marketing collateral will be provided for each department included in this project.

Selectron Technologies’ Project Manager will assist in gathering the correct information to be displayed on the marketing collateral. Information displayed includes the following:
• IVR phone number(s)
• Department logo (preferably in EPS format)
• Department address
• A description of functionality
• Additional contact/informational phone numbers
• Samples: where to find account/ permit/ case numbers, etc.

Any changes to the collateral that do not include the items listed above (e.g., design changes to the template) are billed on a time and materials basis. Any changes to the marketing materials after final delivery are also billed on a time and materials basis.

6.1.6. Interface Upgrades
After service initiation, Roseville’s Harris Cayenta CIS database application may release new updates to their application or its interface. Upgrading the Relay interface to be compatible with any Roseville application database (or other application database software) may require professional services outside the scope of this service.

6.2. Roseville, CA
This section outlines the Customer’s service implementation and maintenance requirements and responsibilities.

6.2.1. Return Questionnaires andInformation
Selectron Technologies’ Project Manager provides Roseville with an implementation questionnaire. The implementation questionnaire must be returned prior to developing the call flow design and the implementation timetable.

6.2.2. Provide Customer Specific Information
The following information should be supplied to Selectron Technologies, in conjunction with the Implementation Questionnaire, to help create a precisely integrated product.

For further clarification on the format and detail of the following data, refer to the Implementation Questionnaire or contact your Selectron Technologies’ Project Manager.
• Street names
June 29, 2021 Page 10 of 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 • Observed holidays
• Extensions used for transferfunctions
• Utility account numbering scheme
• Validations used for receiving payment on a utilitybill

6.2.2.1. Approve Channel Configuration
The Customer is responsible for approving the application design developed by Selectron Technologies’ Project Manager. This includes reviewing:
• Call flow for the IVRsolution
• Outbound messagingformat
Once the channel design(s) have been approved, software development begins.

6.2.3. Provide Remote Network Access to ApplicationDatabase(s) In order to fully test the interactive solution, Selectron Technologies requires access to Roseville’s application database(s) prior to installation. The Customer will help facilitate communication between Selectron and the database vendor.

6.2.4. Provide System Access
Selectron Technologies requires access to the Customer’s network and database/ system. Changing or deleting access accounts could lead to disruption in service for the interactive solution and/or Selectron Technologies’ ability to provide timely support.

Please notify Selectron Technologies immediately if the accounts for the Application Database, payment gateway or network are modified. Roseville is responsible for providing Selectron with appropriate application database and payment gateway network access as defined in the System Integration section.

6.2.5. Confirm ServiceFunctionality
Roseville, CA has 30 calendar days after service initiation to verify the functionality of the interactive solutions. Within the 30-day system acceptance period the Customer should test system functionality using the provided Quality Assurance Test Plan.

Additionally, the System Acceptance Sign-off form must be sent to Selectron Technologies’ Project Manager within this period.

6.2.6. Contact Customer Support
Anytime the Customer requests a significant change to their Selectron interactive solution, an authorized contact from the agency must provide acknowledgement to Selectron’s Customer Support Department. A significant change is a modification that June 29, 2021 Page 11 of 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 will A) change system behavior, B) allow users to change the system, or C) allow access to protected data.

June 29, 2021 Page 12 of 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Master Services and Hosting Agreement
This Master Services and Hosting Agreement (this “Agreement”) by and between Selectron Technologies, Inc., an Oregon corporation having a principal place of business at 12323 SW 66th Avenue, Portland, OR 97223, and its successors and assigns (“Selectron”), and Roseville, CA (“Licensee”).

Recitals
Whereas, as between Selectron and Licensee, Selectron isthe owner of all rights, titles, and interest in and to certain software and materials, identified more particularly in this Agreement as the “Licensed Software”; and Whereas, Selectron wishes to grant to Licensee, and Licensee desires to obtain from Selectron, certain rights to access and use, and to permit authorized Licensee employees to access and use the Licensed Software through Selectron’s application hosting service, as more particularly described below and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree to the following terms and conditions, which set forth the rights, duties and obligations of the parties:

Agreement

1. Definitions
For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings. Any capitalized terms used in this Agreement that are not defined in this Section 1 shall have the meaning given to them elsewhere in this
Agreement.

1.1 “Aggregate Data” means information,
data, and statistics about a group of individuals,
organizations, or transactions that cannot be used to
identify Licensee or a particular individual, including Licensee Data that has been de-identified and anonymized and combined with data about other individuals and
transactions.

1.2 “Authorized User” means an Employee
that Licensee provides with access to the Licensed
Software.

1.3 “Customer Tools” means the Licensed
Software components and interfaces that, as described in the Documentation, are designed and intended to be
accessed by customers of Licensee through an application that isset up and maintained as part of the Services and/or Licensee’s website.

1.4 “Derivative Work” shall mean a new or
modified work that is based on or derived from a
preexisting work, including, without limitation, a work that in the absence of a license, would infringe the Intellectual Property Rights associated with such preexisting work.

1.5 “Documentation” shall mean the
standard documentation for the Licensed Software, as
generally provided by Selectron to its othercustomers.

1.6 “Employee” shall mean a then-current
employee of Licensee.

1.7 “IntellectualPropertyRights” shall mean
all rights associated with (a) patents, designs, algorithms, and other industrial property rights; (b) works of
authorship, including copyrights, “moral rights”, and
derivative works thereof; (c) the protection of trade and industrial secrets and confidential information;
(d) Trademarks(as defined herein); (e) all other intellectual and industrial property rights (of every kind and nature throughout the world and however designated), whether
arising by operation of law, contract, license, or otherwise; and (f) all registrations, initial applications, divisions, continuations, renewals, extensions, divisions, and reissuances of any of the foregoing, now existing or acquired in the future.

1.8 “Licensed Software” shall mean,
collectively, (a) the software programs that are listed in Exhibit A and further described in the included Statement of Work; (b) the Documentation; and (c) anyUpdates.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

1.9 “Licensee Data” means structured data
about and identifiable to customers of Licensee, including without limitation data about transactions between such customers and Licensee, (a) that Licensee provides to
Selectron to enable Selectron to provide the Licensed
Software and the Services, (b) that Selectron collects from Licensee’s customers to facilitate payments by those
customers to Licensee, or (c) that Selectron otherwise
collects or creates, including by automated means, in the course of performing the Services or providing the Licensed Software to Licensee.

1.10 “PCI Data” means Cardholder Data
(including, without limitation, Primary Account Number, cardholder name, expiration date, and Service Code) and Sensitive Authentication Data (including without limitation full magnetic stripe data or the equivalent on a chip,
CAV2/CVC2/CW2/CID, PINs/PIN block), as such terms are
defined by the PCI Security Standards Council.

1.11 “Security Incident” means a breach of
security resulting in an unauthorized third party gaining access to Licensee Data if (a) such breach creates a
substantialrisk of harmto Licensee or any individual(s) and (b)the Licensee Data was accessed in unencrypted, usable, or readable form or it is reasonably likely that the
unauthorized third party has acquired or will acquire the decryption key or other means of converting the Licensee Data to readable or usable form.

1.12 “Services” means the outbound call
management, customization, training, set-up,
configuration, or other services listed in Exhibit A and further described in the included Statement of Work
hereto, the Technical Support Services, and any other
services Selectron provides to Licensee as described
herein.

1.13 “Technical Support Services” means the
maintenance and technical support services described in Exhibit B hereto.

1.14 “Term” shall have the meaning set forth
in Section 11.1.

1.15 “Trademarks” shall mean (a) the
trademarks, trade names, and service marks used by a
party, whether registered or unregistered; (b) the
respective stylistic marks and distinctive logotypesfor such trademarks, trade names, and service marks; (c) such other marks and logotypes as either party may designate from
time to time in writing; and (d) the goodwill
connected with the use of and symbolized by any of the
foregoing.

1.16 “Updates” shall mean any modifications,
error corrections, bug fixes, new releases, or other updates of or to Licensed Software, including the Documentation, that may be provided or otherwise made available
hereunder by Selectron to Licensee during theTerm.

1.17 “Work Product” means any and all work
product, deliverables, materials, drawings, works of
authorship, creative works, designs, inventions,
documentation, methods, processes, techniques,
software, reports, or data created or developed by
Selectron in the course of performing the Services or
providing the Licensed Software, excluding Licensee Data.

2. Grant of License; Restrictions

2.1 Grant of License to Use Licensed
Software. Subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, including the End User License Agreement
(“EULA”) attached hereto as Exhibit D which is
incorporated into and made a part hereof, and the timely payment of all fees hereunder, Selectron hereby grants to Licensee a non-exclusive, nontransferable,
nonsublicensable, limited license, during the Term, to
access and use the Licensed Software solely in accordance with the Documentation and the EULA and solely for
Licensee’s own internal business use. Except as set forth in this Section 2.1 or the EULA, no other right or license of any kind is granted by Selectron to Licensee hereunder with respect to the Licensed Software.

2.2 Software Restrictions. Licensee hereby
acknowledges and agrees that it shall not use the Licensed Software for any purpose other than the purpose for which Selectron has developed the Licensed Software, and that it shall use the Licensed Software in accordance with the
EULA and all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. In the event of any violation of this Section 2.2 or the terms of the EULA by Licensee or any person Licensee provides with
access to the Licensed Software (whether or not such
person is an Authorized User), Selectron may terminate
this Agreement in accordance with Section 11.2, and shall be entitled to equitable relief in accordance with Section

12.5. 2.3 Data Restrictions. Selectron hereby
acknowledges that the Licensee Data may contain
sensitive, personally-identifiable information. Selectron will not disclose Licensee Data to any third-party except as required to perform its obligations under this Agreement DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 (e.g., transmittal of PCI Data to Licensee’s designated payment gateway) and will maintain and use the Licensee Data only for purposes of performing its obligations under this Agreement. Except as otherwise expressly provided
herein, Selectron will promptly delete any Licensee Data that Licensee requests in writing to be deleted (except for data retention required by law).

2.4 Rights in Aggregate Data.

Notwithstanding Section 2.3, Selectron may, (a) during the term of this Agreement, use and analyze the Licensee Data to generate Aggregate Data and (b) during and after the term of this Agreement, retain, use, publish, and otherwise disclose Aggregate Data without restriction, so long as the Aggregate Data is disclosed in a form in which it cannot be used to identify Licensee or any particular individual(s). By way of example and without creating any limitation,
Selectron may analyze the Licensee Data along with data gathered from other sources to generate statistics and
analytics about success rates of municipalities in collecting payments in response to application notification calls.

3. Deliverables and Services

3.1 Services. Selectron shall perform the
Services described in Exhibit A and the included Statement of Work and the Technical Support Services described in Exhibit B in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

3.2 Delivery, Testing, and Acceptance. All
deliveries of equipment or physical goods required under this Agreement shall be F.C.A. Selectron’s facilities.

Selectron shall provide Licensee with the Documentation and access to the Licensed Software according to the
delivery, testing, and acceptance schedule and terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A and the included
Statement of Work. Unless a testing period of different duration is set forth in Exhibit A or the includedStatement of Work, Licensee shall have a testing period of thirty (30) days from the date of delivery of any Licensed Software, including any customized Licensed Software, to inspect
and test the Licensed Software. If Licensee provides
Selectron with written notice during the applicable testing period describing the Licensed Software’s failure to
substantially comply with the limited warranty set forth in Section 7.2 in sufficient detail to enable Selectron to reproduce such failure, the Service Fees for the nonconforming Licensed Software shall be suspended until Selectron corrects any such substantial non-conformity. If Licensee does not provide such notice during the testing teriod, the Licensed Software shall be deemed accepted, and Licensee’s sole remedy for any non-conformance shall be the Technical Support Services providedhereunder.

3.3 Authorized Users; Licensee
Identification and Passwords. Except as provided in
Section 3.4, Licensee shall not permit any person to access the Licensed Software other than Employees whom
Licensee has designated as Authorized Users. Each
individual natural person shall be a separate Authorized User for purposes of this Agreement. Licensee shall create or request that Selectron create unique log-in credentials, consisting of a “User Identification” and “User Password”, for each individual Authorized User who shall be accessing the Licensed Software. Licensee hereby acknowledges that Licensee and its Authorized Users bear sole responsibility for protecting the confidentiality of all User Passwords and shall remain fully responsible and liable for(and Selectron shall not be responsible or liable for) any unauthorized use of any User Identifications or User Passwords. Licensee shall not share or disclose, and shall not permit any
Authorized User to share or disclose, such Authorized
User’s log-in credentials with or to any other individual or entity, even if such other individual is also anAuthorized User. A User Identification may not be transferred from one Authorized User to another Authorized User. Licensee shall promptly terminate (or cause to be terminated by
requesting that Selectron terminate) the User
Identification for any individual who ceases to be an
Authorized User for any reason, including without
limitation due to termination of such individual’s
employment with Licensee. Licensee shall promptly notify Selectron if it discovers or suspects that any log-in
credentials have been accessed or used by any person
other than the Authorized User to which such log-in
credentials were granted, in which case Selectron shall promptly reset or provide Licensee with a means of
resetting the password associated with such log-in
credentials.

3.4 Customer Tools. Licensee maypermit its
customers to access and use the Customer Tools solely
through Licensee’s website and/or an application that is set up and maintained as part of the Services, and solely for the purpose of enabling such customers to (a) receive notifications sent by or on behalf of Licensee, (b) make paymentsto Licensee, (c) view their invoicesfrom Licensee and history of payments to Licensee, and (d) update their contact information with Licensee.

3.5 Hosting. During the Term, Selectron
and/or its designees shall host and maintain the Licensed Software, and provide access thereto, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and theEULA.

3.6 Updates, Maintenance, and Technical
Support. During the Term, Selectron shall provide
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Licensee with Updates as they are made generallyavailable by Selectron to its other customers, as well as maintenance and technical support, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit B. Any Updateprovided or made available by Selectron hereunder shall be deemed
part of the Licensed Software and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of thisAgreement.

3.7 Other Modifications to the Licensed
Software. Licensee understands and agrees thatSelectron may make modifications and updates to the Licensed
Software from time to time. Selectron may determine in its sole discretion whether to provide such modifications and updates to Licensee and its other customers as an Update hereunder, or whether such modifications andupdates will be issued as a separate or new product or premiumversion of the Licensed Software that is available only at an
additional charge.

3.8 Further Licensee Obligations. Licensee
shall be solely responsible for acquiring and maintaining, at its own expense, the necessary equipment and Internet and telecommunication services required to access the
Licensed Software and the Services. Licensee
acknowledges that Selectron shall have no obligation to assist Licensee in using or accessing the Licensed Software or the Service except as expressly set forth in this
Agreement.

4. Fees and Payment

4.1 Service Fees. Licensee shall pay to
Selectron service fees (“Service Fees”) in the amountsand according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A. In addition to the payment of Service Fees, unless
different terms are provided for in Exhibit A, Licensee agrees to reimburse Selectron for all actual, documented and reasonable travel and out-of-pocket expenses
incurred by Selectron in connection with the performance of any Services.

4.2 Payment Terms. Unless different
payment terms are set forth in Exhibit A, all fees and
expenses payable hereunder shall be due thirty (30) days from the date of invoice, and any amounts not paid when due will incur late fee charges at the rate of 1.5% per month, or the maximum rate permitted by applicable law, whichever is lower, calculated on a daily basis. If any amounts are past due and outstanding, Selectronreserves the right to suspend the licenses granted hereunder,
suspend access to the Licensed Software, and discontinue the Services until all outstanding amounts are paid.

Selectron is entitled to recover all costs of collection, including attorney’s fees and related expenses.

4.3 Disputed Amounts. Any disputed
charges must be presented by Licensee to Selectron in
writing within fifteen (15) days of the date of invoice, and the parties agree to cooperate in good faith to promptly resolve any disputed invoice within fifteen (15) days of Selectron’s receipt of Licensee’s written notice of dispute.

In the event Licensee disputes any amounts invoiced by
Selectron in good faith, the undisputed amount shall be paid when due, and only disputed amounts shall be
withheld pending resolution of the dispute. If payment ofa disputed amount has already been made and later
resolution of the dispute is in Licensee’s favor, a credit will be issued by Selectron to Licensee on the nextinvoice.

4.4 Fee Increases. During the Initial Term,
the Service Fees set forth in Exhibit A shall apply. After the Initial Term (as defined in Section 11.1 below), Selectron may increase or change its fees by providing Licenseewith notice of such increase or change at least ninety (90) days prior to the effective date of such increase or change.

Licensee’s sole alternative to such fee increase or change shall be to terminate this Agreement by providing notice of termination to Selectron within twenty (20) days after
receipt of the notice of price increase or change, which termination will become effective thirty (30) days after such written notice oftermination.

4.5 Taxes. All prices set forth in this
Agreement are in U.S. Dollars and are exclusive of any
applicable taxes. Licensee shall pay, indemnify, and hold Selectron harmless from all import and export duties,
customs fees, levies, or imposts, and all sales, use, value added, or other taxes or governmental charges of any
nature, including penalties and interest, and all
government permit or license fees assessed upon or with respect to any products sold, leased, or licensed to
Licensee and any services rendered to Licensee; provided, however, that Licensee shall not be responsible for paying any taxes imposed on, or with respect to, Selectron’s
income, revenues, gross receipts, personnel, or real or personal property or other assets.

5. Proprietary Rights
As between Selectron and Licensee, Selectron and/or its licensors own and shall retain all right, title and interest, including, without limitation, all Intellectual Property Rights in and to the Licensed Software and any Work
Product resulting from performance of the Services and
any portionsthereof, including without limitation any copy DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 or Derivative Work of the Licensed Software (or any
portion thereof) and any Updates and upgrades thereto.

Licensee agrees to take any action reasonably requested by Selectron to evidence, maintain, enforce, or defend the foregoing. Licensee shall not take any action to jeopardize, encumber, limit, or interfere in any manner with
Selectron’s or its licensors’ ownership of and rights with respect to the Licensed Software or Service, or any
Derivative Work or Update or upgrade thereto. The
Licensed Software and any Work Product are licensed, not sold, and Licensee shall have only those rightsin and to the Licensed Software and Work Product and any Derivative
Work or Update or upgrade thereto as are expressly
granted to it under this Agreement, including theEULA.

6. Proprietary Information
During the Term of this Agreement and after the
termination of this Agreement, the parties will take all steps reasonably necessary to hold the other party’s
Proprietary Information in confidence, will not use the disclosing party’s Proprietary Information in any manner or for any purpose not expressly set forth in this Agreement, and will not disclose any such Proprietary Information to any third party without the disclosing party’s expressprior written consent; provided, however, that each party (the “receiving party”) may disclose Proprietary Information of theother party (the “disclosing party”) (a)to such receiving party’s employees, directors, officers, contractors, and agents (collectively, “Representatives”) who have a need to know such information and who have been advised of
and have agreed to comply with the confidentiality
restrictions contained in this Section 6 and (b) to such third parties as are authorized or directed by the disclosing party in writing. Each party shall be responsible and liable for the actions and omissions of its Representatives. “Proprietary Information” belonging to a disclosing party includes, but is not limited to, such disclosing party’s (a) trade secrets, inventions, ideas, processes, formulas, source and object codes, data, other works of authorship, know-how,
improvements, discoveries, developments, designs, and
techniques; (b) information regarding its plans for
research, development, new products, marketing and
selling, budgets and unpublished financial statements,
licenses, prices and costs, suppliers and customers; (c) information regarding the skills and compensation of
employees, and (d) other information about or belonging to such disclosing party that the receiving party should reasonably know, due to the nature of the information or the circumstances surrounding its disclosure, is regarded by the disclosing party as confidential. Proprietary
Information includes reports, analyses, notes, and other information or materials that contain or are derived using the disclosing party’s Proprietary Information, even if developed in whole or in part by the receiving party.

For clarity, information about the Licensed Software,
including information about its features, functionality, and pricing, are and shall remain the Proprietary Information of Selectron. For further clarity, Licensee Data is and shall remain the Proprietary Information of Licensee.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, information will not be
considered to be Proprietary Information if (a) it is readily available to the public other than by a breach of this
Agreement; (b) it has been rightfully received by the
receiving party from a third party without confidentiality limitations; (c) it has been independently developed by the receiving party without reference to or use of the
disclosing party’s Proprietary Information; or (d) it was rightfully known to the receiving party prior to its first receipt from the disclosing party. The receiving party shall be entitled to disclose the disclosing party’s Proprietary Information if required by law or a judicial order; provided that the receiving party first provides prompt notice of the required disclosure to the disclosing party, and complies with any protective or similar order obtained by the
disclosing party limiting the required disclosure.

7. Representations and Warranties; Warranty
Disclaimer.

7.1 Mutual Representations. Each party
represents and warrants to the other party that the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement
(a) is within its corporate, municipal, or governmental powers, as the case may be (b) has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate, municipal, or governmental
action on such party’s part, and (c) does not and shall not contravene or constitute a default under, and is not and shall not be inconsistent with, any law, regulation,
judgment, decree or order, or any contract, agreement, or other undertaking, applicable to such party.

7.2 Limited Software Warranty and
Exclusive Remedy. Subject to the limitations set forth in this Agreement, Selectron represents and warrants to
Licensee that the Licensed Software, when used in
accordance with the Documentation, shall throughout the Term substantially conform to the functionalspecifications in such Documentation. If Licensee finds what it reasonably believes to be a failure of the Licensed Software to
substantially conform to the functional specifications in the Documentation, and provides Selectron with a written report that describes suchfailure
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 in sufficient detail to enable Selectron to reproduce such failure, Selectron shall use commercially reasonable efforts to correct or provide a workaround for such failure at no additional charge to Licensee in accordance with Exhibit B hereto. Outside the United States, this limited warranty is only available with proof of purchase from an authorized source. EXCEPT FOR THE EXPRESS WARRANTY ABOVE,

SELECTRON PROVIDES THE LICENSED SOFTWARE TO
LICENSEE “AS IS” AND “AS AVAILABLE.” SELECTRON MAKES

NO WARRANTY THAT ALL ERRORS, FAILURES, OR DEFECTS

SHALL BE CORRECTED, OR THAT ACCESS TO OR USE OF THE
LICENSED SOFTWARE SHALL BE UNINTERRUPTED, ERRORFREE, OR SECURE. NO ORAL OR WRITTEN INFORMATION

OR ADVICE PROVIDED BY SELECTRON, ITS AGENTS, OR ITS

EMPLOYEES, SHALL CREATE ANY WARRANTY OR IN ANY

WAY INCREASE THE SCOPE OF THE WARRANTIES

EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS
AGREEMENT. This Section states the entire liability of
Selectron and the sole and exclusive remedy of Licensee with respect to any breach of the foregoing express
warranty.

7.3 Limited Services Warranty and
Exclusive Remedy. Subject to the limitations set forth in this Agreement, Selectron warrants that the Services shall be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner.

Selectron’s sole obligation, and Licensee’s exclusive
remedy for breach of the foregoing warranty, is that
Selectron shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to re-perform the Services or otherwise cure such breach. If, in Selectron’s sole judgement, curing the breach is not commercially feasible, Selectron shall credit Licensee for a portion of the fees allocable to the affected period of time that is proportionate to the period the Services or
Licensee’s ability to access or use the Licensed Software was impaired.

7.4 Disclaimer of Other Warranties. THE
EXPRESS WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION 7 AND
SECTION 8.5.5 CONSTITUTE THE ONLY WARRANTIES MADE

BY SELECTRON WITH RESPECT TO THE LICENSED

SOFTWARE AND THE SERVICES AND ANY OTHER SUBJECT
MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT. SELECTRON MAKES NO

OTHER, AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER,

REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, OR CONDITIONS OF

ANY KIND, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED (EITHER IN FACT

OR BY OPERATION OF LAW), OR STATUTORY, WITH

RESPECT TO THE LICENSED SOFTWARE, THE SERVICES, OR
ANY OTHER SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT.

SELECTRON EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OR

CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A

PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT,

AND ALL WARRANTIES THAT MAY ARISE FROM COURSE OF

DEALING, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE, OR USAGE OF
TRADE. SELECTRON DOES NOT WARRANT THAT ANY USE

OF OR ACCESS TO THE LICENSED SOFTWARE SHALL BE

ERROR-FREE OR SECURE, OR THAT OPERATION OF THE

LICENSED SOFTWARE SHALL BE UNINTERRUPTED, AND

HEREBY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL LIABILITY IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH. LICENSEE ACKNOWLEDGES

THAT IT HAS RELIED ON NO WARRANTIES OTHER THAN
THE EXPRESS WARRANTIES IN SECTION 7 AND SECTION

8.55 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

7.5 Defects Not Covered by Warranties.

Selectron shall have no obligations under Section 7.2 to the extent any nonconformance or failure of, or error in, the Licensed Software is caused by (a) use of any attachment, feature, hardware, software, or device in connection with the Licensed Software, or combination of the Licensed
Software with any other materials or service, unless the combination is performed by Selectron;
(b) transportation, neglect, misuse, or misapplication of the Licensed Software, or any use of the Licensed Software that is not in accordance with this Agreement, the EULA, and/or the Documentation; (c) alteration, modification, or enhancement of the Licensed Software, except as may be
performed by Selectron; (d) failure to provide a suitable use environment for all or any part of the Licensed
Software; or (e) failure to maintain systems and
environments that are compatible withUpdates.

8. Security

8.1 Internet Security. Selectron’s Licensed
Software is made available through the Internet and may be used to access and transfer information over the
Internet. Licensee issolely responsible for the security and integrity of information it transfers from the Licensed Software, if any. Selectron makes no representations or warranties to Licensee regarding (a) the security or privacy of Licensee’s network environment, or (b) any third-party technologies’ orservices’ ability tomeet Licensee’s security and privacy needs. These third-party technologies and
services may include, but are not limited to, operating systems, database managementsystems, web servers, and
payment processing services. Licensee issolely responsible for ensuring a secure environment for information it
transfers from the Licensed Software, if any. Further,
Licensee acknowledges and agrees that Selectron does not operateorcontroltheInternet andthat Selectron shall have no responsibility or liability in connection with a breach of security or privacy regarding the Licensed Software or
information contained therein that is caused by (a) viruses, worms, Trojan horses, or other undesirable data or
software; (b) unauthorized users, e.g., hackers; or
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 (c) any other third party or activity beyond Selectron’s reasonable control; in each of the foregoing cases, except to the extent caused by Selectron’s breach of Section 8.4 or 8.5.

8.2 Remote Access Security. In order to
enable code development and support and maintenance
of the software, Selectron may require remote access
capability. Remote accessis normally provided by installing PC-Anywhere, ControlIT, or other industry standard
remote access software. It may also be provided through a Licensee solution such as VPN access. Regardless of what method is used to provide remote access, or which party provides remote access software, it is Licensee’s
responsibility to ensure that the remote access method
meets Licensee’s security requirements. Selectron makes no representations or warrantiesto Licensee regarding the remote access software’s ability to meet Licensee’s
security or privacy needs. Selectron also makes no
recommendation for any specific package or approach
with regard to security. Licensee is solely responsible for ensuring a secure network environment.

8.3 Outbound Services Disclaimer.

Outbound services are intended to create additional
methods of communication for Licensee’s employees who
use the Licensed Software in support of existing processes.

These services are not intended to replace all interaction with Licensee’s end users or employees. While the
outbound services have been created with the best
available tools and practices, they are dependent on
infrastructure that is inherently not fail-proof, including but not limited to infrastructure such as software,
computer hardware, network services, telephone services, and e-mail. Examples of situations that could cause failure include but are not limited to: down phone lines, all lines busy, equipment failure, email address changes, and
Internet service disruptions. For this reason, while
outbound services are valuable in providing enhanced
communication, they are specifically not designed to be used as the sole method to deliver critical messages.

Licensee acknowledges that it is aware of the potential hazards associated with relying on an automated
outbound service feature, when using the Licensed
Software, and Licensee acknowledges and agrees that it is giving up in advance any right to sue or make any claim against Selectron, and that Licensee forever releases
Selectron from any and all liability caused by (a) any failed call attempts (including excess of calls over and above network or system capacity), incomplete calls, or any busyouts; (b) any failure to transmit, obtain or collect data from callers or for human and machine errors, faulty or
erroneous input, inarticulate caller communication, caller delays or call lengths exceeding estimated call lengths or omissions, delays and losses in connection with the
Services provided hereunder; or (c) if Licensee, Licensee’s employees, or Licensee’s end user suffer injury or damage due to the failure of outbound services to operate, even though Licensee does not know what or how extensive
those injuries or damages might be, unless such losses
were directly attributable to Selectron’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.

8.4 Privacy and Security Standards.

Selectron agrees that it will gather, collect, receive, generate, store, use, maintain, transmit, process, import, export, transfer and disclose the Licensee Data
substantially in compliance with applicable data
protection, security, breach notification and privacy laws, rules, regulations and industry standards to which
Selectron is subject. Selectron shall, at all times, use reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality of the Licensee Data in its possession or care, including technical, administrative, and physical safeguards that are
appropriate given the nature of the LicenseeData.

8.5 PCI Compliance. Selectron warrants
that, during the Term of this Agreement, (a) all system components, people, processes, and the cardholder data
environment that are used in Selectron’s collection,
transmittal, or other processing of PCI Data on behalf of Licensee are and shall remain compliant with the
applicable provisions of PCI DSS; and (b) Selectron
PayEngine™, Selectron’s proprietary payment application, is and shall remain compliant with PA-DSS. On an annual basis or upon Licensee’s request, Selectron shall provide Licensee with an Attestation of Compliance or Attestation of Validation confirming such compliance.

8.6 Incident Response. In the event
Selectron becomes aware of a confirmed or suspected
Security Incident involving the unauthorized disclosure or theft of PCI Data, Selectron shall (a) notify Licensee, (b) cooperate in any investigation, (c) promptly take
reasonable measures to prevent further unauthorized
access or use of the Licensee Data, (d) cooperate with
Licensee’s notification to affected individuals if such notification isrequired by applicable law orregulation, and (e) perform all such other acts, or cooperate with
Licensee’s performance of all such other acts, that are required with respect to such Security Incident by
applicable law or regulation.

8.7 Limited Scope of PCI Data Processing.

The parties acknowledge that Selectron’s sole processing of PCI Data on behalf of Licensee shall consist of (a)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 collecting PCI Data needed to facilitate payments to
Licensee, (b) transmitting such PCI Data to a third party payment gateway designated by Licensee, and (c) receiving confirmation via the payment gateway that the payment
transaction has been completed. After transmittal of PCI Data to the payment gateway, Selectron will not retain, store, or continue to use or process such PCI Data.

8.8 Data Transfers Between Licensee and
Selectron. The parties acknowledge that, to facilitate
providing the Services and the Licensed Software,
Selectron and Licensee shall regularly transfer Licensee Data to each other. Licensee, not Selectron, is responsible for providing and maintaining a secure file transfer
protocol for such transfer of Licensee Data, and shall be responsible for maintaining the security of the system
components, environment, and procedures of such file
transfer protocol.

8.9 Licensee’s Privacy Practices. Licensee
acknowledges that the LicenseeData includes information about individuals with whom Licensee, rather than
Selectron, has direct relationships. Therefore, it is
Licensee’s obligation, and not Selectron’s obligation, to provide any privacy notices or disclosures to, and obtain any consent from, such individuals as may be required by applicable law with respect to processing of the Licensee Data by Selectron on Licensee’s behalf. Licensee
represents, warrants, and covenants to Selectron that (a) Licensee hasthe authority to transmit the Licensee Data to Selectron; and (b) Selectron’s collection, storage,
transmittal, and other processing of the Licensee Data on behalf of Licensee, as described in the Documentation and this Agreement, does not and will not violate any
applicable laws, regulations, ordinances, contracts,
policies, orders, or decrees to whichLicensee is subject.

9. Indemnification

9.1 Infringement Indemnity Obligations of
Selectron. Selectron shall defend any action brought
against Licensee to the extent it is based on a third party claim that use by Licensee of the Licensed Software as
furnished hereunder, which use is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, directly infringes or misappropriates any valid United States patent,
copyright, or trade secret. Selectron shall pay any
liabilities, costs, damages, and expenses (including
reasonable attorney’s fees) finally awarded against
Licensee in such action that are attributable to such claim.

Licensee agrees to promptly notify Selectron of any known or suspected infringement or misappropriation of
Selectron’s proprietary rights of which Licensee becomes aware. Should the Licensed Software become, or be likely to become in Selectron’s opinion, the subject of any claim of infringement, Selectron may, at its option (a) procure for Licensee the right to continue using the potentially
infringing materials; (b) replace or modify the potentially infringing materials to make them non-infringing; or
(c) terminate this Agreement and provide Licensee with a refund equal to the set-up fees paid by Licensee, less an amount equal to the depreciated portion of such fees
calculated on a five (5) yearstraight-line basis. This Section

9.1 states the entire liability of Selectron andthe exclusive remedy of Licensee with respect to infringement of any
third-party intellectual property or other rights, whether under theory of warranty, indemnity, or otherwise.

9.2 Infringement Indemnity Obligations of
Licensee. Selectron shall have no liability for any claim based upon (a) the use, operation, or combination of the Licensed Software with non-Selectron programs, data,
equipment, or documentation if liability would have been avoided but for such use, operation, or combination;
(b) use of other than the then-current, unaltered version of the Licensed Software that incorporates all Updates; (c) Licensee’s or its agents’ or Employees’ activities after Selectron has notified Licensee that Selectron believes such activities may result in infringement; (d) any
modifications to or markings of the Licensed Software that are not specifically authorized in writing by Selectron; (e) any third party software; (f) any Licensee Data; or (g) Licensee’s breach or alleged breach of this Agreement.

Licensee shall indemnify, defend, and hold Selectron
harmless for, from and against all liabilities, costs,
damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s
fees) awarded against or incurred by Selectron in such
action(s) that are attributable to such claim.

9.3 Security Related Indemnity Obligations
of Selectron. If an investigation performed by a qualified third party forensic investigator confirms that a Security Incident was caused solely by an act or omission of
Selectron, including any security vulnerability in system components, procedures, or environments owned or
controlled by Selectron, then Selectron shall defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless Licensee for, from and
against all liabilities, costs, damages, fines, penalties, and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) incurred by Licensee as a result of such Security Incident, including the reasonable costs of investigation and reasonablecosts of notification to affected individuals and providing credit monitoring or other fraud prevention services, but only to the extent such notification, credit monitoring, or other DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 fraud prevention services are required by applicable laws, regulations, a court order or consent decree, or the terms of a settlement and release of claims arising from such Security Incident that Selectron has consented to
(collectively, “Losses”).

9.4 Security Related Indemnity Obligations
of Licensee. Selectron shall have no liability or obligation to defend or indemnify Licensee with respect to any Losses caused by Licensee’s breach of Sections 8.8 or 8.9 or any Security Incident to the extent caused in whole or in part by an act or omission of Licensee or any third party (other than Selectron’s subcontractors) or any of their affiliates, employees, directors, officers, agents, or contractors
(other than Selectron), including without limitation any of the following acts or omissions: (a) their loss of control of any device, (b) their failure to maintain the confidentiality of log-in credentials, (c) their transmission of data via methods that are not secure, (d) their failure to maintain systems and environments that are compatible with any
Update, (e) their violation of the applicable terms of this Agreement or any applicable laws, regulations, orindustry standards, or (f) any vulnerability in their environment, systems, hardware, software, or physical or administrative security safeguards or procedures, including without
limitation any vulnerability in the file transfer protocol maintained by Licensee pursuant to Section 8.8. Licensee shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Selectron for, from and against all Losses arising from any such Security Incident or Licensee’s breach of Sections 8.7 or 8.8,
including without limitation any expenses incurred by
Selectron in complying with its obligations under Section

8.6. 9.5 Conditions for Indemnification. The
parties’ indemnification obligations hereunder shall apply only if (a) the party to be indemnified (the “indemnitee” notifies the party obligated to indemnify them (the
“indemnitor”) in writing of a claim promptly upon learning of or receiving the same; and (b) the indemnitee provides the indemnitor with reasonable assistance requested by
the indemnitor, at the indemnitor’s expense, for the
defense and settlement, if applicable, of any claim. The indemnitee's failure to perform any obligations or satisfy any conditions under this Section 9.5 shall not relieve the indemnitor of its obligations hereunder except to the
extent that the indemnitor can demonstrate that it has
been materially prejudiced as a result of suchfailure.

9.6 Control of Defense. After receipt of
notice of a claim, the indemnitor shall be entitled, if it so elects, at its own cost, risk and expense (a) to take control of the defense and investigation of such lawsuit or action; and (ii) to employ and engage attorneys of its own choice to handle and defend the same; provided, however, that
the indemnitee’s consent shall be required for any
settlement that does not include a full release of all claims.

If the indemnitor fails to assume the defense of such claim within ten (10) business days after receipt of notice of the claim, the indemnitee will (upon delivering notice to such effect to the indemnitor) have the right to undertake, at the indemnitor’s cost and expense, the defense,
compromise or settlement of such claim on behalf of and for the account and risk of the indemnitor; provided,
however, that such claim shall not be compromised or
settled without the written consent of the indemnitor. The party that assumes control of the defense of the claim will keep the other party reasonably informed of the progress of any such defense, compromise or settlement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the indemnitee shall be
entitled to conduct its own defense at the cost and
expense of the indemnitor if the indemnitee establishes that the conduct of its defense by the indemnitor would reasonably be likely to prejudice materially the indemnitee due to a conflict of interest between the indemnitee and the indemnitor; and provided further that in any event, the indemnitee may participate in such defense at its own
expense.

10. Limitation of Liability

10.1 Limited Remedy. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY

PROVIDED HEREIN, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT ALLOWED

BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL SELECTRON OR

ITS SUPPLIERS OR LICENSORS BE LIABLE FOR, OR BE

OBLIGATED TO INDEMNIFY LICENSEE FOR, ANY LOSS OF

PROFITS, LOSS OF BUSINESS, LOSS OF USE OR DATA, OR

INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS, OR FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL,

INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR PUNITIVE

DAMAGES OF ANY KIND OR OTHER ECONOMIC LOSS

ARISING FROM OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE

SUBJECT MATTER HEREOF, EVEN IF SELECTRON HAS BEEN

ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES,
HOWEVER CAUSED.

10.2 Maximum Liability. Notwithstanding
anything in this Agreement to the contrary or the failure of essential purpose of any limited remedy or limitation of liability, Selectron’s entire liability arising from or relating to this Agreement or the subject matter hereof, under any legal theory (whether in contract, tort or otherwise), shall not exceed the lesser of: (a) the amounts actually received by Selectron from Licensee hereunder in the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the action that gave rise to the claim; or (b) the amount actually covered and paid by Selectron's insurance carrier for the applicable claim.

Licensee acknowledges that the Service Fees reflect the allocation of risk set forth in this Agreement and that DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 Selectronwould not enterinto this Agreement without the limitations on liability set forth in this Agreement. This limitation of liability provision does not reduce available insurance.

11. Term and Termination

11.1 Term. The term of this Agreement shall
commence on the Effective Date and continue for an initial period of four (4) years therefrom (the “Initial Term”), and shall may renew for successive one (1) year periods
(collectively, the “Term”). If Licensee cancels prior to the end of the Initial Term of four (4) years, all fees for the Initial Term of this agreement that are unpaid will
become immediately due.

11.2 Termination for Default. If either party
materially defaults in any of its obligations under this Agreement, the non-defaulting party, at its option, shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by written
notice to the other party unless, within sixty (60) calendar days after written notice of such default, the defaulting party remedies the default, or, in the case of a default which cannot with due diligence be cured within a period of sixty (60) calendar days, the defaulting party institutes within the sixty (60) day-period substantialsteps necessary to remedy the default and thereafterdiligently prosecutes the same to completion. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event Licensee breaches the EULA or Sections 2.2, 5 and/or 6 of this Agreement, Selectron may immediately terminate this Agreement. Licensee shall notify Selectron within twenty-four (24) hours of
Licensee’s becoming aware of any breach (other than by
Selectron) of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including, without limitation, any breach of Sections 2.2, 5 or 6.

11.3 Termination for Bankruptcy. Either
party may terminate this Agreement if the other party
(a) becomes insolvent; (b) fails to pay its debts or perform its obligations in the ordinary course of business as they mature; (c) is declared insolvent or admitsits insolvency or inability to pay its debts or perform its obligations as they mature; or (d) becomes the subject of any voluntary or
involuntary proceeding in bankruptcy, liquidation,
dissolution, receivership, attachment, or composition, or makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, provided that, in the case of an involuntary proceeding, the proceeding is not dismissed with prejudice within sixty (60) days after the institution thereof.

11.4 Effect of Termination. Upon the
expiration or termination of this Agreement, all rights and licenses granted to Licensee hereunder shall immediately and automatically terminate. Within ten (10) days after any termination or expiration of this Agreement, Licensee shall, at its sole expense, return to Selectron (or destroy, at Selectron’s sole election) all Licensed Software and
Proprietary Information of Selectron (and all copies,
summaries, and extracts thereof) then in the possession or under the control of Licensee and its current or former employees. Licensee shall furnish to Selectron an affidavit signed by an officer of Licensee certifying that, to the best of its knowledge, such delivery or destruction has been fully effected. Termination of this Agreement by either party shall not act as a waiver of any breach of this
Agreement and shall not act as a release of either party from any liability for breach of such party’s obligations under this Agreement. Neither party shall be liable to the other for damages of any kind solely as a result of
terminating this Agreement in accordance with its terms.

Either party’s termination of this Agreement shall be
without prejudice to any other right or remedy that itmay have at law or in equity, and shall not relieve either party of liability for breaches occurring prior to the effective date ofsuch termination. Any provisionsthat would reasonably be expected by the parties to survive termination of this Agreement shall survive such termination, including
without limitation the provisions of the EULA andSections 1 (“Definitions”), 2.2 (“Software Restrictions”),

2.3 (“Data Restrictions”), 2.4 (“Rights in Aggregate Data”), 4 (“Fees and Payment”) (with respect to amounts accrued but as-yet unpaid), 5 (“Proprietary Rights”), 6 (“Proprietary Information”), 7 (“Representations and Warranties;
Warranty Disclaimer”), 8 (“Security”), 9
(“Indemnification”), 10 (“Limitation of Liability”), 11 (“Term and Termination”) and 12 (“General Provisions”).

12. General Provisions

12.1 Notices. Any notice, request, demand or
other communication required or permitted hereunder
shall be in writing, shall reference this Agreement, and shall be deemed to be properly given (on the earliest of) (a) when delivered personally; (b) when sent by facsimile, with written confirmation of receipt; or (c) upon receipt three (3) days after having been sent by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid.

All notices shall be sent to the address set forth on the signature page below (or to such other address as may be designated by a party by giving written notice to theother party pursuant to this Section 12.1).

12.2 Governing Law; Jurisdiction. This
Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California, U.S.A., DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 without reference to its conflicts of law provisions. The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the
International Sale of Goods does not apply to and shall not be used to interpret this Agreement. Any dispute regarding this Agreement must be brought in the state or federal
courts located in Placer County, California, U.S.A.

12.3 Construction. This Agreement has been
negotiated by the parties and their respective counsel. This Agreement shall be interpreted fairly in accordance with its terms and without any construction in favor of or
against either party.

12.4 Attorneys’ Fees. If any legal action is
brought relating to this Agreement or the breach hereof, the prevailing party in any final judgment shall be entitled to the full amount of all reasonable expenses, includingall court costs and reasonable attorney fees paid or incurred.

12.5 Injunctive Relief. In the event that
Licensee breaches any provision of the EULA or Sections 2, 5, or 6 or any other material provision of this Agreement, Licensee acknowledges and agrees that there may be no
adequate remedy at law to compensate Selectron forsuch
breach, that any such breach may result in irreparable
harm to Selectron that would be difficult to measure;and, therefore, that upon any such breach or threat thereof, Selectron shall be entitled to seek injunctive and other appropriate equitable relief (without the necessity of
proving actual damages or of posting a bond or other
security), in addition to whatever remedies Selectron may have at law, in equity, underthis Agreement, or otherwise.

12.6 Waiver. The waiver by either party of a
breach of or a default under any provision of this
Agreement, shall be in writing and shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach of or default under the same or any other provision of this Agreement, nor
shall any delay or omission on the part of either party to exercise or avail itself of any right or remedy that it has or may have hereunder, operate as a waiver of any right or remedy.

12.7 Severability. If the application of any
provision of this Agreement to any particular facts or
circumstances shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable, then (a) the validity and enforceability of such provision as applied to any other particular facts or circumstances and the validity of other provisions of this Agreement shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby, and (b) such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent
possible so as to effect the intent of the parties, and reformed without further action by the parties, to the
extent necessary to make such provision valid and
enforceable. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, Licensee agrees that Section 7.4 will remain in effect notwithstanding the unenforceability of any other provision hereof.

12.8 Independent Contractor Relationship.

Selectron’s relationship with Licensee will be that of
independent contractor, and nothing contained in this
Agreement shall be deemed or construed as creating a
joint venture, partnership, or employer-employee
relationship. Licensee is not an agent of Selectron and is not authorized to make any representation, contract, or commitment on behalf of Selectron, or to bind Selectron in any way. Selectron is not an agent of Licensee and is not authorized to make any representation, contract, or
commitment on behalf of Licensee, or to bind Licensee in any way. Selectron will not be entitled to any of the
benefits that Licensee may make available to its
employees, such as group insurance, profit sharing, or
retirement benefits.

12.9 Force Majeure. Except for the payment
of monies due hereunder, neither party shall be
responsible or have any liability for any delay or failure to perform to the extent due to unforeseen circumstances or causes beyond its reasonable control, including, without limitation, acts of God, earthquake, fire, flood, embargoes, labor disputes and strikes, riots, war, error in the coding of electronic files, Internet or other network “brownouts” or failures, power failures, novelty of product manufacture or other unanticipated product development problems, and
acts of civil and military authorities; provided that such party gives the other party prompt written notice of the failure to perform and the reason therefor and uses its reasonable efforts to limit the resulting delay in its
performance and to mitigate the harm or damage caused
by such delay.

12.10 Public Announcements. Licensee shall
cooperate with Selectron so that Selectron may issue a
press release concerning this Agreement; provided,
however, Selectron may not release any such pressrelease without the prior approval of Licensee (which shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed, or conditioned).

However, without seeking prior approval in each instance, Selectron shall have the right to use Licensee’s name as a customer reference, and to use Licensee’s trade name on Selectron’s customer lists.

12.11 U.S. Government Rights. (a) The
Licensed Software is a “commercial item,” as that term is DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 defined at 48 C.F.R. 2.101, consisting of “commercial
computer software” and “commercial computer software
documentation,” as such terms are used in 48 C.F.R.

12.212 or 48 C.F.R. 227.7202, as applicable. Consistent with 48 C.F.R. 12.212 and 48 C.F.R 227.7202-1 through
227.7202-4, the Licensed Software are licensed to any U.S.

Government End Users (i) only as a commercial item and
(ii) with only those rights as are granted to all other end users pursuant to the terms and conditions herein.

Manufacturer is Selectron Technologies, Inc., 12323 SW
66th Avenue, Portland, OR 97223, USA. This Section,
consistent with 48 C.F.R. § 12.212 and 48 C.F.R. § 227.7202 is in lieu of, and supersedes, any other Federal Acquisition Regulation, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement, or other clause or provision that addresses United States Government rights in computer software,
technical data, or computer softwaredocumentation.
(b) The parties agree that, in the event that Licensee
is a governmental entity, all other state and local
governments within Licensee’s state may purchase a
license from Selectron to use the LicensedSoftware under the same terms and conditions as set forth in this
Agreement by entering into a master services and hosting agreement with the same terms and conditions asset forth herein with Selectron.

12.12 Export Controls. The Licensed Software
is subject to the export control laws of the United States and other countries. Licensee may not export or re-export the Licensed Software, unless Licensee has first obtained Selectron’s prior written permission and the appropriate United States and foreign government licenses, at
Licensee’s sole expense. Licensee must otherwise comply with, and contractually require that all of its employees comply with, all applicable export control laws and
regulations in the use of the Licensed Software. None of the Licensed Software may be downloaded or otherwise
exported or re-exported (a) into any country for which the United States has a trade embargo, or (b) to anyone on the U.S. Treasury Department’s list of Specially Designated Nationals or the U.S. Commerce Department’s Denied
Persons List. Licensee represents and warrantsthat it is not located in, under the control of, or a national or resident of any such country or on any such list. Licensee shall defend, indemnify and hold Selectron and allsuccessors, assigns, affiliates, suppliers, and each of their officers, directors, employees, and agents harmless for,
from, and against any and all claims, allegations, damages, liabilities, and costs and expenses (including without
limitation attorneys’ fees and costs) arising out of
Licensee’s violation of such export control laws. Licensee further agrees to comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as amended.

12.13 Captions and Section Headings. The
captions and Section and paragraph headings used in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of thisAgreement.

12.14 Counterparts. This Agreement may be
signed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement, and,
when taken together, shall be deemed to constitute one
and the same agreement. Each party agrees that the
delivery of this Agreement by facsimile transmission or by PDF attachment to an e-mail transmission will be deemed to be an original of the Agreement so transmitted and, at the request of either party, the other party will confirm facsimile or e-mail transmitted signatures by providing the original document.

12.15 Modification; Subsequent Terms. No
amendment or modification of any provision of this
Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized signatory of Selectron and Licensee.

To the extent that the terms and conditions of the Exhibits hereto or Exhibits to subsequent amendments or
modifications of or to the Agreement (“Subsequent
Terms”) differ from those herein, those Subsequent Terms shall control the interpretation and any conflict resolution thereof. The terms on any purchase order or similar
document submitted by Licensee to Selectron will not
modify the terms and conditions of thisAgreement.

12.16 Entire Agreement; Amendment. This
Agreement, including the Exhibit(s) attached hereto,
constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
concerning the subject matter hereof, and supersedes
(a) all prior or contemporaneous representations,
discussions, proposals, negotiations, conditions,
agreements, and communications, whether oral or
written, between the partiesrelating to the subject matter of this Agreement, and (b) all past courses of dealing and industry custom.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

EXHIBIT A
Scope of Work
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

EXHIBIT B
Maintenance and Technical Support
This Exhibit describes the software maintenance and support services that Selectron shall provide for Licensee.

I. Definitions
Unless defined otherwise herein, capitalized terms used in this Exhibitshall have the samemeaning asset forth in the Agreement.

A. “Error” means any failure of the Licensed Software to conform in any material respect with the Documentation.

B. “Error Correction” means either a bug fix, patch, or other modification or addition that bringsthe Licensed Software into material conformity with the Documentation.

C. “Priority A Error” means an Error that renders Licensed Software inoperative or causes a complete failure of the Licensed Software, asapplicable.

D. “Priority B Error” means an Error that substantially degradesthe performance of Licensed Software, as applicable, or materially restricts Licensee’s use of the Licensed Software, as applicable.

E. “Priority C Error” means an Error that causes only a minor impact on Licensee’s use of Licensed Software, as applicable.

II. Error Reporting and Resolution
A. Error Reporting. Selectron shall provide Licensee with telephone customer support twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week for the reporting of Priority A Errors, and telephone support during Selectron’s normal business hours for the reporting of Priority B and Priority C Errors, in each event excluding Selectron holidays.

B. Licensed Software Error Resolution. Selectron shall use commercially reasonable efforts to:
(a) notify applicable Vendors of all Licensed Software Errors properly reported by Licensee in accordance with Section II(A) of this Exhibit B; (b) make available to Licensee any Error Corrections that are made available by such Vendor(s) to Selectron promptly after such Error Corrections are delivered to Selectron; and (c) update Licensee with respect to the progress of the resolution of all Licensed Software Errors.

C. Error Resolution. Licensee shall report all Errors in the Licensed Software to Selectron in sufficient detail, with sufficient explanation of the circumstances under which the Error occurred or is occurring, and shall reasonably classify the Error as a Priority A, B, or C Error. Selectron shall use commercially reasonable efforts to correct any Error in the Licensed Software reported by Licensee, in accordance with the priority level actually assigned by Selectron to such Error, asfollows:

1. Priority A Errors. In the event of a Priority A Error, Selectron shall, within two (2) hours of receiving Licensee’s report, commence verification of the Error. Upon verification, Selectron shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve the Error with an Error Correction. Selectron shall use commercially reasonable efforts to provide a workaround for the Error within twenty-four (24) hours of receiving Licensee’s report of such Error, and an Error Correction within forty-eight (48) hours of receiving Licensee’s report. Selectron shall provide Licensee with periodic reports (no less frequently than once every eight (8) hours) on the status of the Error Correction.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

2. Priority B Errors. In the event of a Priority B Error, Selectron shall, within six (6) hours of receiving Licensee’s report, commence verification of the Error. Upon verification, Selectron shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve the Error with an Error Correction. Selectron shall use commercially reasonable efforts to provide a workaround for the Error within forty-eight (48) hours of receiving Licensee’s report of such Error, and an Error Correction within six (6) business days of receiving Licensee’s report. Selectron shall provide Licensee with periodic reports (no less frequently than once every twelve (12) hours) on the status of the Error Correction.

3. Priority C Errors. In the event of a Priority C Error, Selectron shall, within two (2) business days of receiving Licensee’sreport, commence verification of the Error. Upon verification, Selectron shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve the Error with an Error Correction. Selectron shall use commercially reasonable efforts to provide a workaround for the Error within six (6) business days of receiving Licensee’s report of such Error, and an Error Correction within three (3) weeks of receiving Licensee’s report.

Selectron shall provide Licensee with periodic reports on the status of the Error Correction.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

EXHIBIT C
Intentionally Left Blank
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

EXHIBIT D
SELECTRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
This End User License Agreement (this “EULA”) is part of a Master Services and Hosting Agreement (the “Master Agreement”) between Selectron Technologies, Inc., an Oregon corporation (“Selectron”, “we”, “our”, or “us”) and the person or entity identified in the Master Agreement as the Licensee purchasing Services from us (“Licensee”). This EULA governs use by Licensee and all natural persons to whom Licensee provides access to the Licensed Software (each, an “Authorized User”). In this EULA, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, all references to “you,” or “your” means both the Licensee and the Authorized User. All capitalized terms used but not defined in this EULA have the meanings given to them in the MasterAgreement.

SELECTRON PROVIDES THE LICENSED SOFTWARE SOLELY ON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS EULA AND ON THE CONDITION THAT YOU ACCEPT AND COMPLY WITH THEM. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE

TERMS OF THIS EULA, SELECTRON WILL NOT AND DOES NOT LICENSE THE LICENSED SOFTWARE TO YOU, AND YOU MUST NOT USE OR ACCESS THE SOFTWARE.

1. License Grant. Subject to your strict compliance with this EULA, Selectron hereby grants you a nonexclusive, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, limited license to use the Licensed Software solely in accordance with the Documentation, the Master Agreement, and this EULA, for Licensee's internal business purposes. The foregoing license will terminate immediately on the earlier to occurof:
(a) the expiration or earlier termination of the Master Agreement between Selectron and Licensee; or
(b) your ceasing to be authorized by Licensee to use the Licensed Software for any or no reason.

2. Scope of License. Subject to and conditioned upon Licensee's timely payment of the fees set forth in the Master Agreement and your strict compliance with all terms and conditions set forth in this EULA and the Master Agreement, you have a limited right and license to:
(a) Use and access the Licensed Software in accordance with this EULA and the Documentation, solely for Licensee's internal business purposes. (b) Download, display, and use the Documentation, solely in support of Licensee’s use and access of the Licensed Software in accordanceherewith.
(c) Download, display, copy, use, and create derivative works of reports and structured data generated using the Licensed Software, solely for Licensee’s internal business purposes.

3. Copies. All copies of the Licensed Software and Documentationmade by you:
(a) Will be the exclusive property of Selectron;
(b) Will be subject to the terms and conditions of the Master Agreement and this EULA; and DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 (c) Must include all trademark, copyright, patent and other intellectual property rights notices contained in the original.

4. Use Restrictions. You shall not, directly orindirectly:
(a) Use the Licensed Software beyond the scope of the license granted in the Master Agreement and Section 2 of this EULA;
(b) Copy all or any portion ofthe Licensed Software, except as expressly permitted in Section 2 of this EULA;
(c) Decompile, disassemble, decode, or otherwise reverse engineer the Licensed Software, or any portion thereof, or determine or attempt to determine any source code, algorithms, methods, or techniques used or embodied in the Licensed Software or any portion thereof; (d) Modify, translate, adapt or otherwise create derivative works or improvements, whether or not patentable, of the Licensed Software or any part thereof; (e) Provide any other person, including any subcontractor, independent contractor, affiliate, service provider, or other employee of Licensee, with access to or use of the Licensed Software, except as expressly permitted by the Master Agreement or this EULA;
(f) Distribute, disclose, market, rent, lease, lend, sell, timeshare, sublicense, assign, distribute, pledge, publish, transfer or otherwise make available the Licensed Software or any features or functionality of the Licensed Software, to any third party for any reason, whether or not over a network and whether or not on a hosted basis, including in connection with the internet, web hosting, wide area network (WAN), virtual private network (VPN), virtualization, time-sharing, service bureau, software as a service, cloud or other technology or service, except as expressly permitted by the Master Agreement or this EULA; (g) Use the Licensed Software for the commercial or other benefit of a third party; (h) Permit the Licensed Software to be used for or in connection with any facility management,service bureau, or time-sharing purposes, services, or arrangements, or otherwise used for processing data or other information on behalf of any third party; (i) Remove, delete, alter or obscure any trademarks or any copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property or proprietary rights notices, legends, symbols, or labels appearing on or in the Licensed Software, including any copy thereof;
(j) Perform, or release the results of, benchmark tests or other comparisons of the Licensed Software with other software or materials;
(k) Incorporate the Licensed Software or any portion thereof into any other materials, products, or services, except as expressly permitted by the Master Agreement or thisEULA; (l) Use the Licensed Software for any purpose other than in accordance with the terms and conditions of this EULA and the Master Agreement.
(m) Use the Licensed Software in, or in association with, the design, construction, maintenance or operation of any hazardous environments or systems, including (i) power generation systems; (ii) aircraft navigation or communication systems, air traffic control systems or any other transport management systems; (iii) safety-critical applications, including medical or life-support systems, vehicle operation applications or DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 any police, fire or other safety response systems; (iv) military or aerospace applications, weapons systems or environments;
(n) Use the Licensee Data or the Licensed Software in any way that is fraudulent, misleading, or in violation of any applicable laws or regulations (including federal, state, local, and international laws and regulations), including but not limited to export or import control laws, information privacy laws, and laws governing the transmission of commercial electronic messages; or
(o) Use the Licensed Software for purposes of competitive analysis of the Licensed Software, the development of a competing software product or service or any other purpose that is to Selectron's commercial disadvantage.

5. Collection and Use of Information. Selectron may, directly or indirectly through the services of others, including by automated means and by means of providing maintenance and support services, collect and store information regarding your use of the Licensed Software, its performance, the equipment through which the Licensed Software accessed and used, such as dates and times of use by each Authorized User, activities conducted using the Licensed Software, the type of web browser used to access the Licensed Software, the operating system/platform you are using, your IP address, and your CPU speed. You agree that the Selectron may use such information for any purpose related to the Licensed Software, including but not limited to improving the performance of the Licensed Software, developing Updates, and verifying compliance with the terms of this Agreement and enforcing Selectron'srights, including all intellectual property rightsin and to the Licensed Software.

6. Intellectual Property Rights. You acknowledge that the Licensed Software is provided under license, and not sold, to you. You do not acquire any ownership interest in the Licensed Software under this EULA or the Master Agreement, or any other rights to the Licensed Software other than to use the Licensed Software in accordance with the license granted under this EULA and the Master Agreement, subject to all terms, conditions and restrictions contained therein and herein. Selectron reserves and shall retain its entire right, title and interest in and to the Licensed Software and all intellectual property rights arising out of or relating to the Licensed Software, subject to the licenses expressly granted in the Master Agreement and this EULA. You shall use commercially reasonable efforts to safeguard all Licensed Software (including all copies thereof) from infringement, misappropriation, theft, misuse or unauthorized access.

7. Login Credentials. You, the Authorized User, shall not share or disclose your log-in credentials with or to any other individual or entity, even if such other individual is also an Authorized User. If you discover orsuspect that log-in credentials of any Authorized User have been accessed or used by anyone other than the individual to whom such log-in credentials were originally granted, you will promptly notify Selectron, and Selectron shall promptly reset or provide Licensee with a means of resetting the password associated with such log-in credentials.

8. Export Regulation. The Licensed Software may be subject to US export control laws, including the US Export Administration Act and its associated regulations. You shall not, directly or indirectly, export, re-export or release the Licensed Software to, or make the Licensed Software accessible from, any jurisdiction or country to which export, re-export or release is prohibited by law, rule or regulation. You shall comply with all applicable federal laws, regulations and rules, and complete all required undertakings (including obtaining any necessary export license or other governmental approval), prior to exporting, re-exporting, releasing or otherwise making the Licensed Software available outside the US.

9. Governing Law. This EULA shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of California without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of California or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of laws of any jurisdiction other than those of the State of California.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

EXHIBIT E

HOSTING, MAINTENANCE, AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
This Exhibit provides the terms and conditions and service levels for Selectron’s Hosting and Maintenance of the Licensed Software, including both the production and test severs.

1.0 DEFINITIONS
Any capitalized terms used in this Exhibit, “Hosting, Maintenance, and Technical Support,” that are not defined below shall have the same meaning as defined in Section 1 of the Agreement. The following definitions are used only within this Exhibit and shall have the meaning stated herein only for application within this Exhibit. “Basic Support Hours” shall mean Monday through Friday, 5:00 am to 5:00 pm Pacific Time, excluding United States statutory holidays.
“Downtime” means minutes when the Licensed Software is unavailable. “Emergency Maintenance” means Maintenance performed in response to a Force Majeure Event or with the aim to prevent an Error; Selectron shall notify the City as soon as possible, but no later than within two hours after commencement of Emergency Maintenance.
"Error" means any failure of the Licensed Software or the Service, as applicable, to conform in any material respect with the Documentation.
“Error Correction" means either a bug fix, patch, or other modification or addition that brings the Licensed Software or the Service, as applicable, into conformity with the Documentation. “Maintenance” means Services provided by Selectron to the City to keep the System conforming to the Documentation and to respond to requests by the City.
"Priority A Error" means an Error that causes the Licensed Software or Services to be (i) severely impacted, resulting in a complete loss of Access or Use, or (ii) significantly degraded resulting from an essential element of the Licensed Software or Services being non-functional and materially unavailable to a material percentage of Authorized Users without a Workaround being available.
"Priority B Error" means an Error that (i) substantially degrades the performance of the System, (ii) materially restricts Customer's Use of the System, or (iii) causes the System to be materially unstable or have periodic interruptions over a sustained period of time.
"Priority C Error" means an Error that (i) causes only a minor impact on Customer's Use the System, (ii) causes a minor degradation not visible to Users, or (iii) that is cosmetic or otherwise not material to the essential functions of the System.
“Scheduled Maintenance” means the number of minutes that is scheduled for regular maintenance on the System, maintenance normally occurs weekly on any weekday between 09:00pm to 06:00am Pacific Time with a maximum planned Downtime of 240 minutes per month. Whenever possible the City will be provided advance written notice of Downtime relating to Scheduled Maintenance.
“System Availability” means the total number of minutes within the applicable month less any time designated by Selectron as planned Downtime.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 “Scheduled Downtime” means Scheduled Maintenance, Customer Configuration Maintenance, and Emergency Maintenance.
“Unscheduled Downtime” means a System outage (other than those arising from Maintenance, Scheduled Maintenance, Emergency Maintenance, events of Force Majeure, or City systems or the City ’s third party systems) that prevents City Users or the City ’s end users from consummating transactions. “Workaround” means with respect to any Error, the provision of a temporary repair used to bypass, mask or otherwise avoid the Error until a permanent repair is available.

2.0 ERROR REPORTING

2.1 Selectron shall provide Maintenance and Error Corrections to the Licensed Software and Services as required to keep the Licensed Software and Services performing in all respects to the Documentation, and to correct reported Errors that are diagnosed by the City. Selectron shall coordinate isolation and diagnosis of Errors, testing and repair work for the response, tracking, and resolution of all Errors.

2.2 Selectron shall provide Customer with telephone support twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week for the reporting of and response to Priority A Errors, and telephone support during Basic Support Hours for the reporting of Priority B and Priority C Errors.

2.3 When reporting an Error, the City will provide Selectron with sufficient explanation of the circumstances under which the Error occurred or is occurring, and the City shall reasonably classify the Error as a Priority A, B, or C Error.

3.0 ERROR RESPONSE AND RESOLUTION

3.1 Selectron shall use commercially reasonable efforts to correct Errors. Selectron shall provide a first response, first update and subsequent updates for each Error according to time periods described in the following table, in accordance with the priority level actually assigned by the City to such Error.

Incident First Response First Update Subsequent
Updates Resolution
Priority A
Error
1 hour after report
of Error is
received in
accordance with
Section 2
1 hour after
First Response
Every 2 hours Workaround within 24
hours; Error Correction
within 48 hours, or other
time as mutually agreed
Priority B
Error
3 hours during
Basic Support
Hours after report
of Error is
received in
accordance with
Section 2
2 hours after
First Response
during
Basic Support
Hours
Every 2 hours
during Basic
Support Hours
Workaround within 2
Business Days; Error
Correction within 5
Business Days, or other
time as mutually agreed
Priority C
Error
3 business days
after report of
Error is received
in accordance
with Section 2
5 business
days after First
Response
5 business days Workaround within 6
Business Days; Error
Correction within three
weeks, or other time as
mutually agreed
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

3.4 A response may be provided to the City by email. A status update on the Error may be provided by email or may be made available online, on a status website which has been communicated to the City. Each update shall include a description of (a) functionality affected; (b) the start time of the Error; and (c) current status of Error Correction.

3.5 If the Parties have a good faith dispute whether an Error is priority level B or C, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith, including escalation to their respective executives, for resolution within three (3) Calendar Days of notice of the dispute. The Parties, in their respective discretion, may mutually agree to an alternative dispute resolution process for prompt and discrete resolution of the Severity Level dispute.

4.0 SYSTEM AVAILABILITY

4.1 Selectron’s goal for System Availability is set forth in the table below.

Service Level Goal Measure Start Measure End
System Availability (24x7x365) 99.9% First day of the month Last day of the month System Availability shall be measured over the period of each calendar month and calculated as set forth above.

System Availability shall be measured on a pro-rated basis for the month of Acceptance.

4.2 Availability shall be calculated as a percentage using the following formula:

System Availability = (total minutes in given month minus Unscheduled Downtime) divided by total minutes in a given month
The System Availability and goal is for the production server only. The test server shall be considered independent and not calculated as part of System Availability.

5.0 CREDIT FOR FAILURE TO ACHIEVE SYSTEM AVAILABILITY GOAL

5.1 In the event the goal for System Availability is not attained in any given calendar month, the City may continue to Use the System, and Selectron shall credit the City the following percentage of the monthly production IVR Call and Hosting fees paid by the City, based on the System Availability for a given calendarmonth.

Downtime
Measurement
System
Availability
(estimate)
County
Credit
Up to 48 hours of cumulative
Unscheduled Downtime 93% - 100% No City credit
Up to 72 hours of cumulative
Unscheduled Downtime 90% - 92.99% 10% of one month’s fee credit Up to 96 hours of cumulative
Unscheduled Downtime 87% - 89.99% 25% of one month’s fee credit Up to 120 hours of cumulative
Unscheduled Downtime 83% - 86.99% 40% of one month’s fee credit More than 144 hours of cumulative
Unscheduled Downtime 80% - 82.99% 100% of one month’s fee credit DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

6.0 BACK-UP

6.1 Selectron shall back up City data collected by Selectron on a periodic basis throughout the day, with a full backup performed nightly. On a weekly basis, Selectron shall verify such backups are complete, accurate, and accessible.

The combination of incremental and daily backups will ensure that no more than twenty-four (24) hours of data loss will be incurred in the event of a disaster.

6.2 Within the primary datacenter, Selectron shall maintain redundancy for all required server, storage, data base, network, and Internet connectivity to prevent against disruption of the System due to a single hardware device or connectivity failure.

7.0 DISASTER RECOVERY

7.1 In the event that Selectron declares a “disaster” status (as described in section 7.2 below), Selectron will use best efforts to restore the system at a secondary hosting site (either the current alternate collocation site or Selectron’s own facilities) on a temporary basis. This effort may take between 2 and 10 days, or longer, and requires support from the City. As the solution is a complex system reliant on third party systems, Selectron’s ability to restore the system will be limited to the elements within Selectron’s immediate control. Examples of other systems that could delay restoration include the hosted backend database, the City’s network, the regional and national telephone and internet backbones, as well as other interdependentsystems.

7.2 Declaration of Disaster Status. Selectron will declare “disaster” status within one day of its reaching the reasonable belief that an event will cause a complete loss of Service for seventy-two (72) hours or more. At this time Selectron will use its best efforts to contact the City to initiate a recovery plan. The City will be requested to provide direction on priority and availability of necessary assistance for restoration. Selectron will begin recovery efforts coordinated with the City’s priorities for bringing systems back on line.

8. EXCEPTIONS
The terms of this Exhibit do not apply during the following times of exception:

8.1 Service outages beyond Selectron’s immediate control, such as Force Majeure Events or an outage caused by the City, such as the City’s permitting or utility databases being unavailable.

8.2 Outages following a scheduled Update or Upgrade of the Software, where the City did not participate in coordinated functional testing and the coordinated functional testing could have reasonably determined the issue.

8.3 Outages during the initial project implementation phase, or any subsequent major changes to the Software and/or Hosting environment that the City requests, or any major changes being made to the City’s networks or systems.

9.0 LIMITATIONS

9.1 The terms and conditions of this Exhibit apply only to Services related to the production and test environments of the Licensed Software and Services in conformity with the Documentation.

9.2 Unless agreed to by the Parties in writing, this Exhibit does not apply to, and the City may not deploy to City’s end users, the Licensed Software on beta, test and other pre-production release Hardware or operatingsystems.

9.2 Services provided by Selectron under this Exhibit do not include the restoration of data which has been modified or deleted by the City, the provision of additional training because of Updates to the LicensedSoftware, DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5 consulting and training regarding the Use of the Licensed Software or Services and the adjustment of interfaces within the City’s systems.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DB240E3-9E44-4623-9AF8-608EA581F9D5

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2299
File #: 0200
Title:

Software Licensing and Managed Services Support - Contract Purchase Agreement and Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment
Contact: Lisa Gist 916-774-5340 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.10.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt resolutions to approve a contract purchase agreement (3002326) for managed services software support with Workforce Software, LLC and a contract purchase agreement amendment (3000521) for software licensing with Workforce Software, LLC, and authorize the City Manager to execute them.

Staff further requests City Council authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals for the managed services software support contract purchase agreement (3002326) without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

BACKGROUND
The City contracted with Workforce to implement a citywide timekeeping and leave management system that went live in May 2021. In November 2021, the Council approved an amendment to the Application Managed Services and Software as a Service (SaaS) Agreement with lower amounts because the City decided not to implement two of the originally agreed-upon modules.

City staff and Workforce now propose to separate the agreement into two Contract Purchase Agreements so that the service periods and contract amounts for support and licensing may be managed independently. Additional Terms and Conditions are recommended to be added to the SaaS contract to clarify the use of subcontractors and the ability to upgrade the SaaS service, without fiscal impact.

FISCAL IMPACT
The annual cost for the first year of the managed services agreement (3002326) is $87,000.

Funding is included in the Finance Department’s FY2022-23 budget in the General Fund. Staff anticipates that the annual cost for each of the optional renewal years will be below $75,000. The cost of the software licensing agreement (3000521) remains as previously approved at a total cost of $300,000 for five years.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

The approval of a contract purchase agreement and contract purchase agreement amendment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Respectfully Submitted,
Lisa Gist, Finance Manager
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer _____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-353
Workforce SoftwareAgreement 3002326 Managed Services
Resolution 22-354
Workforce SoftwareAgreement 3000521Amendment 3 Software Licensing RESOLUTION NO. 22-353

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THECITY

OF ROSEVILLE AND WORKFORCE SOFTWARE, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OFROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3002326) for managed services software support, between the City of Roseville and Workforce Software, LLC, has been reviewed bythe Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of theCity of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
Contract Purchase Agreement 3002326
Supplier Details:

Company Workforce Software LLC
Contact Robert Glatt
Address 38705 Seven Mile Road Suite 300
Livonia, MI 48152
Submit your response to:

The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:

Insurance requirements:

The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002326
Agreement 3002326
Agreement Date 23-JUN-2022
Revision 0
Agreement Amount 87,000.00 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier Workforce Software LLC
38705 Seven Mile Road Suite 300
Livonia, MI 48152
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(951) 296-5523
()
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials
Vendor shall provide Managed Services support portion of the City of Roseville Request for Proposal (RFP) 400-001 in accordance with the attached WorkForce Software LLC Application Managed Services Statement of Work dated 8/1/22.

Start Date: Upon Executed Agreement
End Date: 7/31/23
Please contact Lisa Gist in Finance at (916)774-5340 or by email at [email protected]. us for questions regarding this agreement.

Contract Terms and Conditions
Negotiated Terms and Conditions for Workforce Software LLC, revised 6/4/20 MC

1. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, including the cost to defend City, and its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, costs or liability that arise out of, or pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant and its agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this indemnity does not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other loss, arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct or defects in design by City or the agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, or arising from the active negligence of City.

Consultant's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

2. Consultant is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an officer, agent or employee of the City.

3. Without the written consent of the City, this Agreement is not assignable by Consultant either in whole or in part. Notwithstanding the foregoing, consent is not required for an assignment of this Agreement in connection with a sale or disposition of a majority of all the assets, voting securities or equity interests of Consultant, or a reorganization, merger or similar transaction of Consultant.

4. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

5. Consultant acknowledges that City may terminate this Agreement should funds not be appropriated by its governing body to continue services under this Agreement, or as permitted by the Master Consulting Agreement and SaaS Agreement.

6. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing. It is integrated and contains the complete understanding of the parties.

7. All equipment, supplies and services sold to the City of Roseville shall conform to the general safety orders of the State of California.

8. Intentionally Omitted.

9. Intentionally Omitted.

10. Consultant agrees to the below insurance requirements:
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Consultant shall maintain the policies of insurance outlined in Attachment A, incorporated herein by this reference, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. The City of Roseville retains sole discretion in determining the types and proper levels of insurance coverage. b. Form. Consultant shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. c. Additional Insureds. Consultant shall also provide a separate endorsement or section of the policy showing City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002326

insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of Consultant.

The additional insured coverage under the Consultant's policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from City's insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be:
(1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater
d. Cancellation/Modification. Consultant shall provide ten (10) days written notice to City prior to cancellation or material modification of any insurance required by this Agreement which would make it noncompliant with this agreement. e. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of City (if agreed to in a written contract) before City's own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
f. Intentionally Omitted.
g. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
h. Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of Consultant may acquire from Consultant by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by Consultant, its employees, agents and sub consultants.
i. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Consultant of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

11. Subject to Section 3.4 of the SaaS Agreement and Section 9 of the Master Consulting Agreement, Consultant shall comply with all federal, state, local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement. Failure to comply with local ordinances may result in monetary fines and cancellation of this Agreement.

12. In the event that the terms of any attachment or exhibit conflict with any terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e-mail delivery of a ". pdf" format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf" signature page were an original thereof.

15. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

17. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms "Contractor," "Consultant," and "Supplier" are used interchangeably.

18. Consultant agrees that any and all information furnished by City shall be deemed proprietary and confidential. All such information, to the extent previously, presently or subsequently disclosed to Consultant and/or processed and derived by Consultant services is the property of City and such property shall be deemed and treated as "Confidential Information" of City.

Consultant acknowledges that such Confidential Information may contain information provided and/or generated by third-parties. Consultant agrees that such Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any third party, except its affiliates who are providing services under the Agreement, without written permission from City, except as required by law. Consultant shall not use the Confidential Information except to perform Consultant's services as directed by City.

19. All facilities, devices, networks and services used to store, deliver, process, backup or purge Confidential Information will employ administrative, physical, technical, and procedural safeguards and best practices at a level sufficient to secure Confidential Information from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure. Such measures will be no less protective than those used to secure Consultant's own information of a similar type, and in no event less than reasonable in view of the type and nature of the information involved. It is the City's expectation that Consultant, at its own expense, shall perform annual audits for any data centers that house Confidential Information, using an independent third-party audit that meets industry standards applicable to the services under this Agreement, and provide the audit report or certification upon request to City.

20. Consultant will retain Confidential Information until deleted by City or City-authorized third party, or for a time period mutually agreed upon by the parties to this Agreement.

22. Consultant shall report to City any data compromise or unauthorized access to Confidential Information within twenty-four (24) hours after Consultant discovers such data compromise 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002326

or unauthorized access. Consultant will take commercially reasonable measures to address any such data compromise or unauthorized access in a timely manner. Except as otherwise required by law, Consultant will not provide notice to end users or other entities of any such data compromise or unauthorized access without written permission from City. Consultant will promptly reimburse City in full for all fees and costs incurred by City in any investigation, remediation or litigation resulting from any such data compromise or unauthorized access, including identity protection and restoration services for each person, who in the City's sole discretion, could be impacted by identity theft.

23. Consultant may not advertise that City is a client, list City as a reference or otherwise use City's name, logos, trademarks, or service marks without prior written permission from City.

24. Consultant acknowledges that services rendered under this agreement (including but not limited to service levels and operational levels) shall be performed in accordance with industry standards.

25. Intentionally Omitted.

26. Intentionally Omitted.

27. Consultant agrees to defend and indemnify City if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that Consultant and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of City.

Consultant and City agree that: (a) Consultant is free from the control and direction of City in connection with the performance of the work; (b) Consultant is providing services directly to City; (c) Consultant has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) Consultant maintains a business location that is separate from City; (e) Consultant is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) Consultant actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from City; (g) Consultant advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) Consultant provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) Consultant has negotiated its own rates; (j) Consultant set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing City's on-call needs; and (k) Consultant has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

The supplier named hereon by the acceptance of this order agrees to the provisions of this document titled "Contract Purchase Agreement" and all accompanying terms, conditions, and attachments.

Roseville Business License No. ____________________________________ Contractor License No. ____________________________________________ DIR Registration No. _______________________________________________ Check mark the applicable company type below:
___________ Corporation
____X_______ Limited Liability Company
___________ Partnership
6 DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 N/A
N/A
N/A
Contract Purchase Agreement 3002326

___________ Sole Proprietor
City reserves the right to withhold any payments to Consultant in the event of noncompliance with insurance requirements or if required by law.

Information Technology T&C
REV 6/4/20 MC
7 DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002326

ATTACHMENT A

HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

AGREEMENT OVER FORMAL BID LIMIT OR INVOLVING HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES Negotiated for Workforce Software LLC, revised 6/4/20 MC General - Required Coverage/Documentation
● General Liability: $1 Million per occurrence /$2 Million aggregate ● Automobile Liability: $1 Million combined single limit ● Workers' Compensation: Statutory *Must provide a Waiver of subrogation ● Additional Insured Endorsement (AIE) - General Liability policy: CG 20 38 04 13 or an equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy. Endorsement shall cover the City of Roseville, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insured. ● Policies must be primary and non-contributory
● A 10 day notice of cancellation must be provided
● List certificate holder as: The City of Roseville - Insurance Compliance, PO Box 100085-R1, Duluth, GA 30096
Additional Liability/Insurance Requirements if required by Agreement (and marked below):

Pyrotechnics:____
General Liability:
$5 Million/occurrence
$10 Million aggregate
Auto - $2 Million/occurrence
Chemical/Environmental:____
General Liability:
$3 Million/occurrence
$6 Million aggregate
Pollution – $2 Million/Occurrence
Auto - $2 Million/Occurrence
Insurance Submission Process
The City of Roseville Human Resources/Risk Management Department uses a service called EBIX to manage our insurance certificate tracking.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Application Managed Services
Statement of Work
August 1, 2022
DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 2

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
This document contains confidential and proprietary information belonging to WorkForce Software, LLC (“WorkForce”) and is intended only for the use of Customer (as defined below). Any reproduction of this document in whole or in part, or the divulgence of any of the information contained herein without the prior written consent of WorkForce is prohibited. The information contained in this document is joint confidential information of WorkForce and Customer.

VERSION HISTORY
Update Description Author
05-12-2022 Initial Version Tyler Cloutier
WorkForce Software, LLC
38705 Seven Mile Road
Suite 300
Livonia, MI 48152
www.workforcesoftware.com
[email protected]
1-877-4-WFORCE
DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 3

1. Introduction...........................................................................................................................................4

2. Definitions..............................................................................................................................................4

3. Levels of Service.....................................................................................................................................5

4. Scope .....................................................................................................................................................8

5. Services Locations and Environments.................................................................................................10

6. Roles and Responsibilities ...................................................................................................................11

7. Acceptance Management....................................................................................................................14

8. Configuration Management & Consulting Request Management Process.........................................14

9. Fees and Schedule ...............................................................................................................................16

10. Approvals .........................................................................................................................................17 DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 4

1. Introduction
City of Roseville, herein referred to as “Customer” has selected WorkForce Software, LLC, herein referred to as “WorkForce”, to provide a Managed Services Support Plan (“MSSP”) for the Online Service under the terms of the Contract and this SOW for the MSSP Support Fees specified herein. The MSSP shall provide services in addition to the obligations of WorkForce under the terms of the WorkForce Time and Attendance Support Plan. A modification of the terms of this SOW shall not be considered a modification of the standard support obligations of WorkForce under the Contract.

This SOW is attached to the Master Consulting Agreement, dated June 17, 2020 (the “Contract”) by and between the Customer and WorkForce.

The parties acknowledge that they are parties to an Application Managed Services Agreement dated June 17, 2020 (the “Previous SOW”) with an initial two-year term which expires Jun 31, 2022 and which automatically renews pursuant to the terms thereof. The parties agree that, upon signature hereto, this SOW is intended to replace the Previous SOW, and as such the Previous SOW shall not automatically renew and shall terminate on August 1, 2022.

2.Definitions
This section defines specific terms used within this document and when capitalized shall have the meaning as defined below. Terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Contract. a) “Configuration” shall mean any changes made to the application using the Policy Editor, interface scripts and report files residing within the Policy Editor, changes to Analytics and queries used to manage items within the configuration.
b) “Full-time Equivalent” (“FTE”) shall mean a unit that indicates the combined workload of dedicated resources. An FTE of 1.0 is equivalent to a full-time worker (estimated as 40 hours per week for 52 weeks per Plan Year) excluding designated holidays. Holidays include the observed holiday days of New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Memorial Day, Juneteenth, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Day After Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, New Year’s Eve.
c) “Incremental Services” means services requested by Customer Sponsor in writing, not covered under the MSSP. Customer Sponsor and WorkForce are jointly responsible for ensuring that requests are within the spend authorization of the contract and its amendments. Such services are provided under the Contract.
d) “Managed Services Support” (“MSS”) means services offered by WorkForce which provides for services defined by the Scope section of this document, and within the skillsets of FTE capacity assigned.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 5 e) “MSSP” means a service plan offered by WorkForce for MSS, as detailed in the Scope section below.
f) “MSSP Support Fees” shall mean the fees for an MSSP. g) “MSSP Support Period” shall mean the period of time that Customer is covered under an MSSP. h) “Resource Capacity” shall mean the staffing level at which WorkForce provides configuration management services support to Customer. Contracted Resource Capacity is set forth in Levels of Service section. The Resource Capacity set forth in Section 3 (MSSP Service Descriptions) below shall not be exceeded except as set forth in Section 3a and 3b below (Service Conditions).

3. Levels of Service
MSSP Service Descriptions
Service Description
Configuration Support & Expertise Support of Customer requirements and configuration as defined in the Configuration Support and Expertise
Activities Scope (Section 4.2)
Configuration Management & Consulting Modification or enhancement of Online Service configuration as defined in Configuration
Management Activities Scope (Section 4.3)
Availability Access to the Managed Service team Monday
through Friday, excluding holidays (“Business Days”)
between 9:00 am and 6:00 pm Eastern Time
(“Business Hours”)
Resource Capacity Configuration Management Service Support is subject to a total capacity constraint (“Resource
Capacity”) of 0.25 FTE.

Customer has the ability to shift up to 20% of the
quarterly capacity to the immediate previous or
future quarter.

Response Time Response time is within 24 Business Hours for tickets submitted through the approved process
Time to Complete Configuration Management: Draft requirements document and delivery plan typically provided within
four Business Days if the total effort is estimated to
be eighty hours or less. For more complex requests,
WorkForce will provide an estimated delivery date
within four days.

Authorized MSS Contacts Up to two (2) Customer individuals authorized to request and approve work performed under the
MSSP.

Request Management Requests will be submitted using the WorkForce support system, currently Salesforce Service Cloud.

Reporting WorkForce will provide a monthly Resource Capacity report which includes the FTE capacity utilized during
the month.

3.1. Service Conditions
a) Should the Configuration Management Services effort (actual plus planned) exceed Resource Capacity, 1) delivery timelines shall be extended to bring the effort to within Resource Capacity, 2) work in excess of the Resource Capacity must be requested by Customer Sponsor in writing and be within the contractual authority spending limits of the contract and its amendments to be considered Incremental Services, or 3) the MSSP shall be amended to adjust Resource Capacity with fees commensurate to such adjustment.
b) MSS resources can be allocated to separately contracted projects at the discretion of Customer up to the total Resource Capacity.
c) To avoid a disruption in the MSS, Customer must pay the MSSP Support Fees in accordance with the Fees and Schedule section below.
d) MSSP Support Fees are non-refundable and the MSSP may not be altered without an amendment to this SOW. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained within the Contract to the contrary, this Application Managed Services Statement of Work may only be terminated due to a material breach by either party which, after written notice, is not cured within thirty (30) days. e) All requests made of the MSSP Team will be delivered using the Request Management Process defined in this document in Section 8. All completed requests provided by WorkForce to Customer will be tested by Customer for completeness and acceptance as defined by the Acceptance Management Process defined in Section 7.
f) All travel approved by Customer will be invoiced monthly according to the terms and conditions of the Contract in addition to the MSSP Support Fees payable under this SOW.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 7 g) WorkForce approved non-U.S. based resources and WFS certified partners are allowed to work on the MSSP activities identified in Section 4. Responsibility for protecting the Customer’s data resides with WorkForce.
h) All communication with WFS consultants will be conducted in English. Documentation produced by WFS or to be reviewed by WFS will be in English.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 8

4. Scope
This section details the complete scope of services to be provided by WorkForce resources under the MSSP. Work requested by Customer and performed by WorkForce resources that meets this Scope definition is considered work performed under this SOW. Any work requested by Customer that is outside of the Scope can only be performed under the terms of this SOW through a corresponding Project Change Order.

4.1. Out of Scope
The following activities are specifically excluded from the scope of this MSSP; this list is provided for clarity and is not all-inclusive of out-of-scope activities:
• Any individual request for Configuration Management Services that requires effort exceeding one (1) month of the Resource Capacity.
• Implementation of additional WorkForce Software product modules • FTE towards specialized skills that are not listed in Section 6: WorkForce Roles & Responsibilities (e.g. Senior Project Managers, Database Administrators, Network Administrators, Performance Tuning Experts.)
• Support outside of Business Hours, except for work at mutually agreed times • Any work activities not listed within scope below

4.2. Configuration Support and Expertise Scope
Upon request by Customer, WorkForce resources will perform the following subject matter expertise:
• Core team of Workforce staff who will be familiar with Customer’s configuration to answer questions and provide recommendations
• Up to twice weekly 1:1 structured reviews of any planned or current configuration changes. This includes reviewing and offering feedback on the proposed system design and on the actual configuration once it is completed.
• Best practice recommendations for managing system environments and how configuration changes should be managed and promoted through each of the environments • Best practice recommendations for project planning, requirements gathering, testing and deployment for any future or current projects.

4.3. Configuration Management and Consulting Activities Scope
Upon request by Customer, WorkForce resources will perform the following:

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 9 Consulting
• Provide consulting by dedicated resource(s) related to WorkForce and industry best practices and trends related to configuration changes, strategic initiatives, and new releases. • Summarize and reporting findings and analysis to enable well-informed decision making. • Provide design services with support of HR and Product experts to review options and discuss pros and cons of making these changes. Consultation with the WorkForce Software Director of Compliance shall not constitute legal advice or the provision of legal services. • Coordinate releases of client specific configuration, ad hoc changes, and post-upgrade enhancements based upon customer’s desired cadence schedule. • Make recommendations on process changes that will enable efficient and intended use of the application.
• Provide guidance on environmental management and design as requested.

Business Analysis
• Facilitate the implementation workforce management best practices and standards. • Partner with customer teams during configuration and testing in order to create a specialized deployment plan.
• Identify application or process changes that will improve efficiencies. • Identify modifications needed in existing configuration to meeting changing customer requirements.
• Analyze gaps or conflicting requirements and provide guidance or solutions on how rules work together.
• Serve as a subject matter expert to provide system recommendations or troubleshooting guidance.
• Provide insight on Human Resources and compliance related interpretations and best practices. • Create detailed work plans to identify and sequence activities needed to successfully complete requested work.
• Support client testing phase with responsiveness and detailed follow through on issues and changes in a professional and timely manner.
• Define high-level data requirements based upon requests for changes. • Develop requirements and design documentation for approval and acceptance, offering alternative solutions when applicable.
• Document standards and best practices for Design, Configuration and Testing. Documents will be stored/provided on a SharePoint location provided by Customer.

Configuration Management
• Complete configuration changes in the customer’s development environment. • Ensure configuration best practices are being utilized.

Program Management
• Coordinate WorkForce resources across multiple work streams. • Manage team specializing in complex configuration and support. • Manage team effectiveness driving change as needed to provide continuous service improvement.
• Encourage open communication between team members to identify opportunities to deliver a more effective service.
• Achieve consistent customer satisfaction rating and ensure timely responses to feedback on areas of improvement.
• Ensure quality, timely and budgeted completion of deliverables.

Product Expertise
• Configuration of the WorkForce product suite, including WorkForce Time and Attendance, Advanced Scheduler, Absence Compliance Tracker, Analytics, Fatigue Management, Forecasting and Scheduling, and Data Collection Terminals to support new customer requirements. • Identify opportunities to reduce the number of interfaces, promote reusable objects, and enable application scalability and high performance, as practical. • Performing configuration and scheduling tuning to improve the efficiency and reliability of program and minimize ongoing maintenance requirements.

MSS Administration
• Creation of supplemental documentation regarding the system processes, configuration and security.
• Monitoring, tracking, and reporting status.
• Securing necessary approval of all changes based upon the Request Management Process. • Compiling and proactively managing issues lists.

5. Services Locations and Environments
WorkForce resources will perform onsite if requested by Customer for mutually agreeable dates and work and travel expenses approved in writing by Customer’s sponsor.

The services performed under this SOW will be performed on the systems identified in the Contract provided by and hosted by WorkForce.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 11

6. Roles and Responsibilities

6.1. Customer Roles and Responsibilities
Customer is solely responsible to ensure Related Systems (as defined in the SaaS Agreement) and data in Customer systems that provide information to WorkForce Time and Attendance or receive information from WorkForce Time and Attendance operate properly. The support provisions of this SOW do not apply to Related Systems or problems in the SaaS Service caused by Related Systems, regardless of who provided, installed, or distributed such. Should WorkForce identify that the root cause of a problem is caused by problems in Related System it shall notify Customer.

Customer is required to provide support to the WorkForce team in order for WorkForce to meet our obligations under this SOW. The following resources/roles are required to be provided by Customer.

Role(s) Responsibilities
Sponsor This individual will champion MSS for Customer and will have the ability and authority to deploy Customer resources (directly or indirectly) as necessary to fulfill Customer obligations necessary for successful completion of MSS. The Sponsor serves as the point of escalation to address any issues, risks, approvals (financial as well as directional), and other related items that may occur throughout the delivery of MSS and is expected to provide guidance and support to the WorkForce and Customer teams.

Application
Manager
This person has overall responsibility for service delivery for Customer and carries out the day-to-day assignment of duties to Customerstaff as necessary.

The Application Manager has the responsibility and authority to make decisions, resolve issues, and engage staff as required. The Application Manager keeps both WorkForce Software and Customer Sponsors aware of the decisions, commitments, and status of the service in a timely and efficient manner.

Functional Analysts
and Subject Matter
Experts
Share knowledge of current and required policies and procedures; engages in any requirement gathering activities and performs in-depth reviews of all interim and final approved changes; provides the expertise necessary to create the necessary test plans, and conducts testing, validation, and acceptance of any changes to the SaaS Service. This role is also responsible for test plan creation, development, execution and delivery to WorkForce Software, and coordination and completion of testing activities.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 12 Role(s) Responsibilities
IT Systems Experts These individuals are responsible for addressing any issues related to Customer owned and operated IT systems that impact the SaaS Service. These individuals are responsible for data, configuration, and system administration activities of these systems. They administer and monitor WorkForce Time and Attendance on behalf of Customer and work directly with the WorkForce team. They are conversant not only with the business practices and policies, but with the technologies required to support the application.

Technical Staff Infrastructure Specialists - These individuals are the primary resources representing Customer’s systems infrastructure. They serve as an interface point to other information systems that may be impacted. They provide support in the form of hardware and/or software installation and configuration, database administration, data preparation, communications and network support. These resources provide direction on network infrastructure and time clock installation. Additional resources may be required to analyze, develop, test, and support Customer interfaces to the SaaS Service.

Training and Change
Management Staff
Creates and delivers end user training, creates internal marketing collateral, and works to achieve “buy-in” for the project among end users.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 13

6.2. WorkForce Roles and Responsibilities
WorkForce shall support the SaaS Service under the terms of the Support Plan. However, any changes required to the configuration are maintained and supported through the terms of this SOW. If a configuration performed under the MSSP does not work properly in future product releases, this will be a support issue and will be resolved through the support and escalation process as described in the Support Plan.

WorkForce will provide resources to support the following roles at various points.

Role(s) Responsibilities
Managed Services
Manager
Responsible and accountable for the execution of the work performed under the MSSP. Primary contact for all MSS activities. Coordinates and manages the activities of the WorkForce MSS Team and measures, tracks, and evaluates progress against plans.

Functional Consultant Works closely with the team to analyze and document requirements, demonstrate and clarify system functionality, provide WorkForce expertise, and recommend best practices and business process improvements.

Technical Consultant Designs, configures and unit tests the application in accordance with the documented requirements and provides configuration support.

Quality Assurance
Tester
The Quality Assurance tester executes test cases against the software configuration prior to delivery.

Integration
Architect/Engineer
Defines and develops system interfaces to support integration with external systems, provides technical assistance necessary throughout the assignments.

Data Collection
Engineer
Configures and test the WorkForce Data Collection Terminal in accordance with the documented requirements.

Reports Developer Develops and tests customized reports and extends the analytics universe in accordance with the documented requirements.

Training Consultant Develops standard training materials based on requirements.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 14

7.Acceptance Management
This section defines the formal Acceptance process that will be followed throughout the service.

Acceptance of a work request by Customer indicates that WorkForce has provided the service according to the accepted requirements and design documented by written approval of Customer Authorized MSS contact.

Acceptance of services under this SOW is the responsibility of Customer’s Authorized MSS Contact.

Completed services will be communicated by WorkForce in monthly Status Reports. If Customer reasonably determines that a service is incomplete, or otherwise materially unacceptable, Customer will document all deficiencies and communicate them to WorkForce within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the monthly Status Report. WorkForce will address all the deficiencies documented, or mutually agree with Customer to alternative actions.

8. Configuration Management & Consulting Request
Management Process

1. Customer Work Requests are submitted via Salesforce ticket (or email to the ticketing system) routed to the MSS team for review, confirmation, estimating and planning.

2. WorkForce confirms receipt of Work Request based upon the timeline in Section 3, Levels of Service.

3. Requirements are confirmed by WorkForce with the Customer Authorized MSS Contact.

4. The draft requirements, plan and estimates are documented and reviewed with the Customer.

5. The plan is provided for acceptance and prioritization to the Authorized MSS Contact.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 15

6. If approved, the configuration changes are scheduled to be worked based on the current capacity of the team and Customer prioritization.

7. Once active, the approved work request is designed and reviewed internally by subject matter experts.

8. The design is then reviewed with the MSS team and submitted for acceptance to the Authorized MSS Contact.

9. Once the design is accepted by the Authorized MSS Contact, configuration begins based upon the approved plan. Configuration changes are tested by WorkForce to confirm functionality as expected.

10. WorkForce packages the configuration and migrates to the testing environments.

11. Acceptance testing is performed by Customer to confirm configuration against requirements and Authorized MSS Contact provides feedback to the MSS team. The creation and execution of all test plans and required test scripts is the responsibility of Customer but can be provided through the MSS WorkForce team upon request.

12. If configuration is accepted, the production migration is scheduled in coordination with the Authorized MSS Contact.

13. If issues are identified, the MSS team will work with Customer to remediate.

14. Once configuration is promoted to production, the Authorized MSS Contact provides confirmation and acceptance.

15. Work effort is closed out.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 16

9. Fees and Schedule
The MSSP and associated obligations identified herein commence on the August 1, 2022 and terminate July 31, 2023. The MSSP Support Fees are invoiced prior to service delivery in four quarterly payments as identified in the table below and are due per the terms of the Contract.

One-Year Period
Year MSSP Support Period Amount Payment Due Dates
Year 1 August 1, 2022 – July 31, 2023 $87,000 August 1st: $21,750 November 1st: $21,750
February 1st: $21,750
May 1st: $21,750
Total $87,000.00
Renewal
This Schedule shall automatically renew for additional one (1) year periods unless either party provides a written notice of termination to the other party at least sixty (60) days prior to the end of the then current term. The pricing during any such renewal term shall increase by Consumer Price Index (CPI) per year over the prices in effect in the immediately prior term.

Incremental Services Fees
The Annual Fee in the tables above include a base Resource Capacity of 0.25 FTE, except as defined in the ramp-up period under Resource Capacity in Section 3 herein. This is the minimum Resource Capacity for which Customer is committed throughout the one-year period.

With a minimum sixty (60) day written notice, Customer may increase or decrease the Resource Capacity in increments of 0.25 FTE per-calendar quarter with a maximum increase or decrease 0.50 FTE per quarter, provided that Customer may never reduce below the base Resource Capacity of 0.25 FTE. The quarterly fee for each increment of 0.25 FTE is $21,750. Incremental fees will be invoiced upon receipt of the written notice by WorkForce with payment terms per the Contract. Fees will continue to be invoiced quarterly until Customer provides notice to decrease the Resource Capacity.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 WorkForce Application Managed Services Support Plan
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 17

10. Approvals
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

City of Roseville WorkForce Software, LLC
Date: _______________________ Date: _______________________ Signature: _______________________ Signature: _______________________ Printed Name: _______________________ Printed Name: _______________________ Title: _______________________ Title: _______________________ DocuSign Envelope ID: CC8DFEBD-5C17-4AC8-8928-2D26381E5F54 RESOLUTION NO. 22-354
APPROVING CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT #3, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND WORKFORCE SOFTWARE, LLC,AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment #3 (3000521), regarding software licensing, between the City of Roseville and Workforce Software, LLC, has been reviewed by the Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Amendment is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
Contract Purchase Agreement 3000521
Supplier Details:

Company Workforce Software LLC
Contact Robert Glatt
Address 38705 Seven Mile Road Suite 300
Livonia, MI 48152
Submit your response to:

The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:

Sole proprietorship - By owner
Partnership - Any general partner
Corporation - Two options:
(1) A signature from the President and the corporate seal; OR (2) One signature from the Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice President AND one signature from the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, or any Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the corporation
*General Manager, Office Manager and/or Sales Manager are not corporate officer titles. The agreement will be rejected if not signed in accordance with these guidelines. 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: C7E72AFA-FB6D-4286-B61B-0641303E6B04 Contract Purchase Agreement 3000521
Agreement 3000521
Agreement Date 08-JUN-2020
Change Order 8
Change Order Date 23-JUN-2022
Revision 4
Agreement Amount 590,558.00 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier Workforce Software LLC
38705 Seven Mile Road Suite 300
Livonia, MI 48152
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(951) 296-5523
()
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials
Amendment #3
Contract Purchase Agreement 3000521 ("Agreement"), which was executed on, 6/17/20, is hereby modified as follows:

The purpose of this modification is: to hereby remove reference of the Managed Services Support portion from the contract purchase agreement effective 7/31/22 and incorporate by reference the attached Amendment #3 WorkForce Software Saas Agreement onto this agreement.

All other provisions of the agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

Please contact Lisa Gist in Finance at (916)774-5340 or by email at [email protected]. us for questions regarding this agreement.

Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 11480 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
"Becky" Rebecca Philipp Phone 1-916-774-5724
Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office. 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: C7E72AFA-FB6D-4286-B61B-0641303E6B04 Contract Purchase Agreement 3000521
3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C7E72AFA-FB6D-4286-B61B-0641303E6B04 CEO
Mike Morini
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 1 AMENDMENT #3 TO THE WORKFORCE SOFTWARE SAAS

AGREEMENT
This Amendment #3 to the WorkForce Software SaaS Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between WorkForce Software, LLC (“WFS”) and City of Roseville (“Customer”) (each, a “Party,” and collectively, the “Parties”).

WHEREAS, the Parties are parties to a certain WorkForce Software SaaS Agreement dated June 17, 2020 (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which Customer purchases from WFS the right to access and use the WFS software-as-a-service platform, together with updates and upgrades thereto, and related services including maintenance and support (the “SaaS Service”); and WHEREAS, the Parties wish to clarify, revise, and amend certain terms of the Agreement in order for Customer to use the most current version of the SaaS Service, which is built on a multi-tenant servicebased architecture developed and supported by global teams.

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. Any terms and conditions currently within the Agreement which do or would restrict WFS’s ability to update and/or upgrade the SaaS Service, including but not limited to an obligation to notify Customer prior to and/or obtain Customer’s consent prior to such update and/or upgrade, shall be deleted from the Agreement.

2. Customer agrees that WFS may utilize the subcontractors and/or affiliates set forth at https://workforcesoftware.force.com/customers/s/article/Third-parties-sub-processors-whostore-or-process-customer-data (the “Subcontractors”) in providing the SaaS Services to Customer, including by providing Customer’s data to such Subcontractors as necessary, and any terms and conditions within the Agreement which do or would restrict WFS’s ability to utilize the Subcontractors, including but not limited to an obligation to notify Customer prior to and/or obtain Customer’s consent prior to such use, shall be deleted from the Agreement. Customer agrees that WFS may update the list of Subcontractors set forth at the link above on occasion by providing thirty (30) days advanced written notice (including via electronic mail) to Customer.

Customer may notify WFS of its rejection, in writing, of any additional Subcontractors within thirty (30) days after such notification setting forth a reasonable basis for objection, in which case the Parties will make a good-faith effort to resolve Customer’s objection. If Customer does not notify WFS of its rejection within thirty (30) days after notification, the changes made by WFS shall be deemed accepted.

3. Any capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined, herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.

4. In the event of a conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, this Amendment shall control.

5. Other than as amended hereby, all other terms and conditions in the Agreement remain in full force and effect.
[signature page to follow]
DocuSign Envelope ID: C7E72AFA-FB6D-4286-B61B-0641303E6B04 Amendment #3 to the WorkForce Software SaaS Agreement
WorkForce Software | [email protected] | workforcesoftware.com 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date of the last signature below.

CUSTOMER WFS
Signature: _______________________ Signature: __________________________ Printed Name: ____________________ Printed Name: ______________________ Title: ___________________________ Title: _______________________________ Date: ___________________________ Date: ______________________________ DocuSign Envelope ID: C7E72AFA-FB6D-4286-B61B-0641303E6B04

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2302
File #: 0721
Title: Westfield Galleria Bus Shelter - License Agreement Contact: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.11.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to authorize the City Manager to execute a License Agreement with Roseville Shoppingtown LLC to maintain the existing bus shelters at The Westfield Galleria Mall.

BACKGROUND
The Westfield Galleria Mall (Galleria) is located at the northwest corner of Galleria Boulevard and Roseville Parkway. Roseville Transit, along with Placer County Transit, utilizes seven existing bus stops located within the Galleria’s property. The seven stops consist of four within the Galleria bus loop, two off of Roseville Parkway and one off of Galleria Blvd. (Exhibit A provides a map of the locations). On September 13, 2000 the Council approved a bus shelter agreement with the Galleria that granted them the rights to advertising at each of the stops. In exchange for the advertising rights, the Galleria would be responsible for the maintenance of the seven bus stops.

On September 13, 2020, the bus shelter agreement expired. The Galleria informed staff they no longer seek to advertise at the bus stops and requested that the City be responsible for maintenance of the seven stops. In response to the Galleria’s request, the City, working closely with the Galleria, developed the attached License Agreement that provides the City access to the bus shelters in order to maintain, repair and replace the bus stops in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Roseville Transit will also have advertising rights at these bus stops.

The term of the License is 10 years from the effective date of this agreement. The City has two options it can exercise to extend the agreement for an additional five years, followed by one more extension of four years and 11 months.

The Galleria is one of the most popular Roseville Transit destinations after the downtown Sacramento commuter routes. Staff believe the minor effort of maintaining the shelters at this destination are negligible compared to the number of trips generated by this location.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact with the execution of this License Agreement. MV Transit is currently paid a lump sum as part of their existing contract to maintain Roseville Transit’s bus stops. MV Transit will incorporate these stops into their regular cleaning schedule at no additional cost to Roseville.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Manager
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-356
Bus Shelter LicenseAgreement
Bus Shelter Locations
RESOLUTION NO. 22-356

APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

AND ROSEVILLE SHOPPINGTOWN LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a License Agreement regarding the bus shelters located at Westfield Galleria at Roseville, between the City of Roseville and Roseville Shoppingtown LLC, has been reviewed by the Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

Roseville Parkway
Galleria Boulevard
Reserve Drive
Exhibit A
Bus Shelter Sites
Roseville Parkway
Galleria Boulevard
Reserve Drive
Exhibit A
Galleria Bus Shelter Sites

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2298
File #: 0114
Title: Federal Legislative Advocacy Services - Professional Services Agreement Contact: Mark Wolinski 916-774-5179 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.12.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the expenditure of $90,600 for a professional services agreement with The Ferguson Group for federal advocacy services.

Staff additionally recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve four (4) additional one (1) years renewal years of the professional services agreement without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same consultant is not in the City’s best interest.

BACKGROUND
The City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for federal advocacy services in March of 2021 and a professional services agreement was awarded to The Ferguson Group. The initial term of the Agreement was for two years, however, only one year of expenditures was approved when the item went to City Council for approval in July 2021. As a result, staff recommends the approval of $90,600 for the second half of the initial term of the Agreement.

The RFP allowed for four (4) optional one (1) year renewals of the Agreement at the discretion of the City Manager, so staff is additionally requesting that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute those additional optional renewals of the Agreement without further City Council approval.

FISCAL IMPACT
The annual costs for the professional services will not exceed $90,800 per fiscal year and will be included in the Public Affairs and Communications Department's budget for each fiscal year. The total annual cost is included in the department's FY2022-23 budget.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Wolinski, Government Relations Administrator
Megan Scheid, Deputy City Manager
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-352
2021Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 22-352

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a professional services agreement for federal advocacy services previously approved on July 7, 2021, by and between the City of Roseville and The Ferguson Group, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2297
File #: 0800-05
Title:

Citywide East Site Radio Communications Tower - Environmental Clearance and Acquisition and Easement Documents
Contact: Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected] Karl Grover 916-774-5145 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.13.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Adopt the Citywide East Site Radio Communications Tower Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND); and

2. Adopt the Citywide East Site Radio Communications Tower IS/MND Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP); and

3. Approve Agreements for Acquisition of Permanent and Temporary Easements and authorize the City Manager to execute them and all related documents.

BACKGROUND
Radio transmission is the primary communication method for the City’s emergency services and many of the daily operations providers (i.e. Police, Fire, Electric, Roseville Transit, and Environmental Utilities), as well as outside agencies during mutual aid incidents. The City’s radio system handles approximately 1.5 million transmissions per year and therefore ensuring adequate coverage throughout the City is crucial.

Roseville operates two 180-foot radio communications towers. One is in west Roseville near the Roseville Energy Park and the second is in central Roseville at the Police Department building on Junction Boulevard. The east side of Roseville is currently served by radio equipment located on the 3rd floor of a commercial building in a leased electrical closet. The current east radio site has many limitations and needs to be relocated to a new site that will improve its reliability, availability, capacity and coverage.

Over the last decade, the City’s Information Technology and Economic Development staff have explored opportunities to provide enhanced radio coverage on the east side of Roseville. A consultant was retained to outline facility requirements and analyze ideal locations that would provide optimal conditions for a public safety grade radio communications site. An exhibit showing potential City-owned properties and private properties is attached. Over the years, the City engaged with several property owners of the identified private property locations. With the exception of one property, the City was turned away at different stages throughout the process for various reasons. The primary challenge with private property has been the appraised Fair Market Value (FMV). For example, two different property-owners showed interest in 2009 and again in 2019 at the Lava Ridge site until the FMV appraisal was significantly lower than what the property owners were willing to accept for selling the property. Subsequently both parties ended negotiations and the City was not interested in pursuing eminent domain.

In the fall of 2020, City staff made progress with a property owner at 2401 Olympus Drive (Valley Springs Church); however, the estimated FMV for acquiring the subject area and establishing the necessary temporary construction easements substantially exceeded the total project budget. The City has considered various heights for the tower and installing multiple lower towers. However based on the coverage maps and the need to fill gaps in coverage and increase in-building coverage (i.e. interior of hospitals, Miner’s Ravine, or Westfield Galleria mall), while providing the connectivity link from East to PD and East to West sites for proper simulcast function and system resiliency, a 180 foot tower is required. After extensive evaluation and numerous attempts, staff was able to identify the nearby City-owned parcel located at 2001 Strauch Drive. This property meets the location requirements identified by the City (i.e. coverage, electrical power access, scalability, physical space for site components, and budget restrictions) and is vacant with no future plans for development.

The Strauch Drive site is an undeveloped approximately 0.8 acre triangle shaped property that is surrounded on two sides by commercial centers. There are several oak trees and a seasonal drainage feature primarily along the Strauch Drive frontage. In an effort to preserve these resources and to minimize construction costs, Economic Development worked with the adjacent commercial property owner to acquire an easement for access to the site via an existing commercial parking lot at the rear of the site. A temporary construction easement will also be granted to facilitate construction of a new driveway connection between the two properties. Part of the action requested of Council is to approve acquisition of these easements. The City would be responsible for constructing and connecting the new driveway to the radio site and for any necessary repairs to the private property caused by the construction project.

L.D. Strobel has worked with the City over the last decade to prepare feasibility plans at possible radio tower locations. Once the Strauch Drive site was deemed to be a realistic option for the east side radio tower site, L.D. Strobel began preparing plans for development of the site with a radio tower similar in style and size to the two existing radio towers in the City. The proposed east site radio facility (project) will include the 180-foot tall radio tower, an equipment shelter, backup generator, propane tank to service the backup generator, security cameras and lighting, and a chain link fence enclosure. The conceptual site plan is attached. City staff is working with L.D.

Strobel to finalize the plans for building and civil improvement permits. Once completed, the plans will be brought back to Council for acceptance, and if accepted, bids would be scheduled to be opened for construction of the project. Staff is anticipating completion of the plans and opening for bids in the next couple of months, award of contract in winter, and construction of the project in the spring to summer of 2023.

Public outreach on this project has occurred in several ways. In July 2022, news of the project was provided in the various City news outlets including posted on the City’s website, emailed in the City News and Business Matters newsletters, and posted on the City’s Twitter and Facebook pages. Postcards were sent out to the Sierra Gardens (inactive) neighborhood property owners and an article was published in the adjacent Maidu Neighborhood Association newsletter. City staff also presented the project at the RCONA Board meeting on July 21, 2022, and at the Maidu Neighborhood Association on August 23, 2022. Additionally, the required CEQA noticing was provided to owners and tenants of properties within 500 feet of the project site. To date, only two comment letters were received. One comment letter included general guidance from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. This letter is informational and no response is required. The second letter was received from a resident expressing concerns and questions about the proposed height of the tower, and how it was evaluated in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Response to this letter is provided in the Environmental Review section below, but in summary, the comments do not change the environmental review determination. No other questions or concerns have been raised on the project as a result of the public outreach other than during the August 23rd Maidu neighborhood meeting.

The August 23rd Maidu Neighborhood Association meeting was attended by approximately 15 members and staff representatives from IT, Economic Development and Police. Staff provided an informational presentation, with similar information to that previously provided in the neighborhood’s July newsletter. Generally attendees expressed an understanding for the project and supported the project purpose, but had concerns over the aesthetics of the tower and potential impacts to property values. Questions were asked of staff on alternative designs to a tower (i.e. faux tree) and considerations for alternative locations. Staff responded to questions and verbally shared the information in the studies that have been completed over the years and the City efforts to evaluate alternative locations. It was also suggested that the City pursue eminent domain for another location, which as mentioned above, the City had previously made the decision to not go this route. Ultimately, as mentioned above, in order to meet the various coverage needs, a 180-foot tower is required and the Strauch Drive site remains the most optimal site to address the project needs and budget constraints.

As mentioned, installation of a new radio site in the east side of Roseville is essential to support emergency services and daily operations. Assuming Council supports the requested actions to move this project forward, staff is anticipating to have the new radio tower operating by late 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the project was approved in 2015 from the Strategic Improvement Fund (72% allocation) and the Public Facilities Fund (28% allocation). The total cost of the project is anticipated to be $1.5 million. General site maintenance would be included in the annual Information Technology Operations Fund budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In accordance with CEQA, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared for the proposed project. The Initial Study determination is that all potential impacts can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level, and therefore the IS/MND satisfies CEQA requirements. Environmental Impact Summary: Impacts are primarily short-term construction related. Mitigation measures were identified for the following environmental issue areas:
• Tribal Cultural Resources
• Cultural Resources
• Biological Resources
Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15097, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) has been prepared to assist with the tracking and implementation of the required mitigation measures.

The IS/MND was made available for a 30-day public review and comment period from July 25 through August 23, 2022. The environmental document availability was announced via: 1) written notice sent directly to surrounding properties; and 2) a legal notice published in the July 23, 2022 edition of the Roseville Press Tribune. These notices advised of the IS/MND availability and public comment period. The environmental document was accessible on the City’s website, copies were made available at the Permit Center front counter, and the document was filed with the California Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse website (SCH No, 2022070353).

The City received two comment letters regarding the IS/MND. One comment letter was received with general guidance from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. The letter is informational and no response is required. A letter was received from a resident questioning why the CEQA document did not identify the potential aesthetic effect of the project as a potentially significant impact. In the comment letter submitted by Lance Hibben (attached), he asked why, in the East Side Communications Tower IS/MND, aesthetics was determined to not be an environmental factor potentially affected by the proposed project. In the course of preparing the analysis, staff determined that because the proposed tower is located in an already urbanized and developed area, the tower would not constitute a significant impact. Although the tower would be taller than the surrounding structures, it would be visually consistent with the surrounding land uses.

In addition, the applicable California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) thresholds of significance related to the aesthetics makes a distinction between urbanized and non-urbanized areas. The CEQA analysis for urbanized areas, such as the area of the proposed project, need only address whether the project would conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. The proposed project is an allowed use under the existing zoning, and as stated on page 3-7 of the IS/MND, according to Section 19.34.010 of the Roseville Municipal Code, buildout of the proposed tower would be required to comply with the regulations and prohibitions in Chapter

19.34, Antennas and Communications Facilities. The regulations and prohibitions in Chapter

19.34 are intended to minimize the adverse impacts of such equipment and structures on neighborhoods and surrounding developments by limiting the height, number, and location of such devices. The proposed project’s required compliance with such would ensure that substantial adverse impacts related to aesthetics do not occur. For example, all wireless communication facilities would be required to be painted colors which are compatible with their surroundings.

Photo simulations of the proposed tower were provided to give agencies and the public an idea of how visible the tower would be from nearby roadways. The simulations were prepared to represent the view of the tower from the specific locations and viewing angles presented. The simulations are based on engineering plans and distance measurements taken in the field; and therefore, provide an accurate representation of the proposed project.

The Initial Study conclusion is that with implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND, all potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant and an MND is proposed to satisfy CEQA requirements. Staff recommends adoption of the IS/MND and MMRP to satisfy the project’s CEQA requirements.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Gina McColl, Economic Development Analyst, and Karl Grover, IT Program Manager Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer, and Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director _____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Conceptual Plan
Resolution 22-351

IS//MND
MMRP
Agreements
LocationAssessment Map
Comment Letter - State Water Board
Comment Letter - Lance Hibben
Conceptual - Not for Construction
Conceptual - Not for Construction
Conceptual - Not for Construction
RESOLUTION NO. 22-351

ADOPTING THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, ADOPTING THE

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, APPROVING THE AGREEMENT FOR

ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY, APPROVING THE PERMANENT NON-EXCLUSIVE

ACCESS EASEMENT AND APPROVING A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR

THE CITYWIDE EAST SITE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS TOWER PROJECT WHEREAS, radio transmission is the primary communication method for the City’s emergency services and many of the daily operations providers (i.e. Police, Fire, Electric, Roseville Transit, and Environmental Utilities), as well as outside agencies during mutual aid incidents; and WHEREAS, the current east radio site has many limitations and needs to be relocated to a new site that will improve its reliability, availability, capacity and coverage; and WHEREAS, after extensive evaluation, staff was able to identify the nearby City owned parcel located at 2001 Strauch Drive for the East Site Radio Communications Tower Project (“Project”), which meets the location criteria identified by the City’s consultant and is vacant with no future plans for development; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared for the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was made available for a 30 day public review and comment period from July 25, 2022 through August 23, 2022; and WHEREAS, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15097, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) has been prepared to assist with the tracking and implementation of required mitigation measures; and
WHEREAS, the Initial Study conclusion is that with implementation of all mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND and MMRP, all potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant and an MND is proposed to satisfy CEQA requirements; and WHEREAS, staff recommends adoption of the IS/MND and approval of the MMRP to satisfy the project’s CEQA requirements.

WHEREAS, Agreements for Acquisition Real Property and Permanent and Temporary Easements needed for the Project have been reviewed by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that it finds on the basis of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the whole record, including public comments and other documents, that if the Citywide East Site Radio Communications Tower Project is conditioned with mitigation measures as proposed, there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Roseville, and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project is hereby adopted.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Citywide East Site Radio Communications Tower Project is hereby approved.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agreements for Acquisition of Real Property, the Permanent Non-Exclusive Access Easement and Temporary Construction Easement for the Citywide East Site Radio Communications Tower Project are hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute them and all related documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
East Site Radio Communication Tower:

Emergency and Daily Operational
Services Project
Prepared for:

July 2022
Prepared by:
1501 Sports Drive, Suite A, Sacramento, CA 95834
i
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction and Summary ...................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Introduction................................................................................................. 1-1

1.2 CEQA Lead Agency.................................................................................... 1-1

1.3 Summary .................................................................................................... 1-2 Chapter 2 Project Description................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 Project Background .................................................................................... 2-1

2.2 Project Location and Existing Conditions.................................................... 2-1

2.3 Proposed Project Components ................................................................... 2-1

2.3.1 Construction of the Proposed Project ......................................................... 2-1

2.3.2 Radio Communications Tower Operations ................................................. 2-7

2.4 Best Management Practices (BMPs).......................................................... 2-7

2.4.1 Construction BMPs ..................................................................................... 2-7

2.4.1.1 Traffic Management Plan............................................................................ 2-8

2.4.1.2 Noise Control Measures ............................................................................. 2-9

2.4.1.3 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Measures............................................. 2-9

2.4.2 City of Roseville Mitigating Ordinances....................................................... 2-9

2.5 Required Entitlements............................................................................... 2-10 Chapter 3 Environmental Checklist.......................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ................................................ 3-2

3.2 Determination ............................................................................................. 3-3

3.2.1 Aesthetics ................................................................................................... 3-4

3.2.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources........................................................... 3-9

3.2.3 Air Quality ................................................................................................. 3-11

3.2.4 Biological Resources ................................................................................ 3-17

3.2.5 Cultural Resources ................................................................................... 3-20

3.2.6 Energy ...................................................................................................... 3-23

3.2.7 Geology and Soils..................................................................................... 3-26

3.2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ..................................................................... 3-29

3.2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials............................................................ 3-31

3.2.10 Hydrology and Water Quality .................................................................... 3-36

3.2.11 Land Use and Planning............................................................................. 3-39

3.2.12 Mineral Resources.................................................................................... 3-41

3.2.13 Noise......................................................................................................... 3-42

3.2.14 Population and Housing............................................................................ 3-47

3.2.15 Public Services ......................................................................................... 3-48

3.2.16 Recreation ................................................................................................ 3-50

3.2.17 Transportation........................................................................................... 3-51

3.2.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ......................................................................... 3-53

3.2.19 Utilities and Service Systems.................................................................... 3-58

3.2.20 Wildfire...................................................................................................... 3-60

3.2.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance .......................................................... 3-62 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
1-1
July 2022
Chapter 1
Introduction and Summary

1.1 Introduction
This document is an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) that addresses the potential environmental impacts of the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project (proposed project) proposed by the City of Roseville (City).

The proposed project would involve the development of a portion of the project site with an unmanned communications tower, with an associated communications building and access driveway. The project site is located east of the intersection of Strauch Drive and Huntington Drive in the City of Roseville, CA. The project site, identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number 048-260-032, is undeveloped and contains several species of trees.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 15004 of the State CEQA Guidelines encourage early completion of environmental documentation to enable environmental considerations to influence project design. This IS/MND is a public information document that discloses the proposed project’s environmental effects and informs decision makers of the project’s compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.

This document describes the proposed project’s background, project components, the existing environmental setting (conditions before implementation of the project), and the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. Chapter 2, Project Description, describes the proposed project and the best management practice (BMP) measures that the City has incorporated into the proposed project to avoid and minimize potential effects.

Chapter 3, Environmental Checklist, identifies the anticipated environmental impacts by topic and provides mitigation measures that would be implemented to avoid significant impacts, if warranted.

1.2 CEQA Lead Agency
As the lead agency for the proposed project under CEQA, the City of Roseville determined that preparation of an IS/MND was necessary to evaluate the environmental issues associated with the proposed project and satisfy the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The IS/MND is available for public review at the following location:

City of Roseville Permit Center
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
(916) 774-5332
City of Roseville Introduction and Summary
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
1-2
July 2022
Due to changeable circumstances regarding COVID-19 concerns, the Permit Center hours for in person document review may be limited. Therefore, the public is encouraged to check the City’s web site first to ensure in office accommodations are available:
https://www.roseville.ca.us
Alternatively, the IS/MND can also be viewed or downloaded from the City’s website via the following link:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/environmentaldocuments
During the review period, written comments may be submitted via email to:
[email protected], or sent by regular mail to:

Ms. Terri Shirhall, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville, Development Services Department
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

1.3 Summary
This IS/MND concludes that the proposed project would have potentially significant but mitigable impacts on biological resources, cultural resources, and tribal cultural resources, as described in Chapter 3, Environmental Checklist. This IS/MND identifies a variety of mitigation measures that the City would implement to avoid or minimize potentially significant impacts on sensitive environmental resources. Implementation of these measures, in addition to project BMPs, would further reduce the potential impacts to a less-than-significant level.

2.1 Project Background
The City of Roseville proposes to allow the construction of the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project (proposed project) in the Infill Planning Area of the City of Roseville, California (see Figure 2-1). The proposed project would involve the construction of a radio communications tower, as well as an associated communications building and access roadway.

2.2 Project Location and Existing Conditions
The project site is located east of the intersection of Strauch Drive and Huntington Drive in the City of Roseville, CA. The project site (see Figure 2-2), identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number 048-260-032, is undeveloped. The site contains ruderal grassland, several species of trees, including oak, along the perimeter of the site, and a drainage feature that crosses the western portion of the site. Surrounding existing land uses include shopping centers with a variety of retail and commercial uses to the north, east, and southeast; undeveloped land to the south and southwest, across Strauch Drive; and shopping centers to the west and northwest, across Strauch Drive. The City of Roseville General Plan designates the site as Community Commercial (CC) and the site is zoned as Planned Development (PD7).

2.3 Proposed Project Components
The proposed project consists of the following main components:
• Construction of the proposed radio communications tower; and • Operations/maintenance of the tower.

The specifications of the proposed tower are described in greater detail below.

2.3.1 Construction of the Proposed Project
The proposed project would involve construction of a 180-foot-tall radio communications tower, a 12-foot by 16-foot shelter for the on-site 70 kiloWatt emergency generator, and a 500- gallon propane tank on a portion of the project site (Figure 2-3, Figure 2-4, and Figure 2-5).

The emergency generator would be fueled by propane, and all components of the proposed project would be fenced within an approximately 2,483-square-foot enclosure. Vehicle access to the site would be provided by a new 12-foot private maintenance roadway connecting to the parking lot immediately east of the project site.

City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project 2-2 July 2022 Figure 2-1
Regional Project Location
Project Site
City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project 2-3 July 2022 Figure 2-2
Project Site
City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project 2-4 July 2022 Figure 2-3
Overall Site Plan
City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project 2-5 July 2022 Figure 2-4
Focused Site Plan
City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project 2-6 July 2022 Figure 2-5
Tower Elevations
City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
2-7
July 2022
Ground disturbing activities associated with construction of the proposed project would be limited to establishing the tower foundation and access road, assembly of the tower and shelter, and worker vehicle circulation. Additionally, tree removal may occur. Construction activities would take place between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through Friday and between 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM Saturday and Sunday, in compliance with the City’s Noise Ordinance.

2.3.2 Radio Communications Tower Operations
The proposed radio communications tower would be unmanned and would not require regular staffing. However, occasional site maintenance, including testing of the emergency generator, would be necessary. Maintenance staff would access the project site through the private easement access road that would connect to the commercial parking lot to the east of the project site.

2.4 Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Water quality measures (stormwater management measures and BMPs) would be implemented as part of the project to minimize potential water quality impacts. Key management measures consist of the following:
• Protect areas that provide important water quality benefits or are particularly susceptible to erosion or sediment loss.
• Minimize the potential for erosion by limiting land disturbances such as clearing, grading, and cut and fill.
• Limit disturbance of natural drainage features and vegetation. • Ensure proper storage and disposal of toxic material. • Incorporate pollution prevention into operation and maintenance procedures to reduce pollutant loadings to surface runoff.

2.4.1 Construction BMPs
The City and its contractor shall implement construction BMPs to avoid and minimize impacts on sensitive environmental resources. Implementation of the BMPs discussed below would minimize the potential for construction-related surface water pollution and ensure that water quality in off-site waterways and wetlands would not be compromised by erosion and sedimentation during construction.

Temporary Fencing. Where appropriate, the City’s contractor shall install construction barrier fencing (including sediment fencing and straw wattles) to prevent contaminants and debris from entering off-site surface waters. Before construction begins, the City or its contractor shall identify the locations for the barrier fencing and mark those locations with stakes or flagging.

Equipment. The City shall comply with applicable stormwater ordinances, stormwater management plans, and BMPs to prevent or minimize the potential release of equipmentrelated petroleum contaminants into adjacent surface waters and groundwater.

Implementation of standard construction procedures and precautions for working with City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
2-8
July 2022
petroleum and construction chemicals would further ensure that the impacts related to chemical handling during project construction would be minor.

Hazardous Materials. The City shall implement appropriate hazardous material management practices and other good housekeeping measures to reduce the potential for chemical spills or releases of contaminants, including any non-stormwater discharge to adjacent surface waters. Implementation of these measures would minimize the potential for surface and groundwater contamination.

Erosion Control. The project design shall incorporate permanent erosion control elements to ensure that stormwater runoff does not cause soil erosion. Erosion and sediment control plans shall comply with the City’s Grading Ordinance, which requires reducing erosion and retaining sediment onsite.

Toxic Materials Control and Spill Response Plan. The following measures shall be incorporated into the plan and implemented to avoid or minimize the risk of spills or discharges of toxic materials into adjacent surface waters:
 Prepare a hazardous material spill prevention, control, and countermeasure plan (SPCC) before construction and implement during construction;
 Prevent raw cement, concrete or concrete washings, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other petroleum products, or any other substances that could be hazardous to aquatic life from contaminating the soil or entering off-site surface waters;  Prevent discharge of drilling mud and fluids into off-site surface waters by using appropriate containment, disposal, and storage methods;  Prevent discharge of turbid water or sediment-laden runoff to off-site surface waters by using sediment filters, diverting the water to a settling tank, and/or implementing other erosion and water quality control BMPs;
 Clean up all spills immediately according to the SPCC;  Provide areas located outside of sensitive environmental areas for staging and storing equipment, materials, fuels, lubricants, solvents, and other possible contaminants; and  Prevent hazardous materials from entering waters. The construction contractor shall notify the City Fire Department if evidence of soil or groundwater contamination is encountered during construction activities. Construction in that area shall be halted until the Fire Department has evaluated the find and remediation is completed, if necessary.

2.4.1.1 Traffic Management Plan
The City shall require the construction contractor to implement a Traffic Management Plan (TMP), including a construction schedule and plan to meet the City’s notice procedures, before construction activities are initiated. This plan shall identify general methods by which construction activities shall be managed to minimize substantial delays to traffic as discussed below.

Communication: Develop and implement a public information campaign that describes the nature and duration of construction activities and when construction related temporary “controlled conditions” and/or travel delays are expected. Particular attention shall be placed on special events (e.g., school graduations or Placer County Fairgrounds events) that may attract unfamiliar users to the City’s roadway system. The City is currently doing public outreach and shall continue the outreach program throughout project design and construction.

City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
2-9
July 2022
Construction: Describe and analyze the number of employees and their site parking areas, and the number of trucks, their routing and staging, and operating hours.

Wayfinding: Position and operate changeable message sign (CMS) trailers at strategic locations and employ other temporary signage as necessary to advise motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists of pending construction activities and alternate routes.

Emergency Vehicle Response: The contractor shall coordinate with City Police and Fire Departments to ensure that all potential effects of construction traffic controls are clearly communicated understood by public safety providers.

2.4.1.2 Noise Control Measures
The following measures shall be incorporated into the construction specifications for the proposed project to reduce and control noise generated by construction-related activities, consistent with City ordinances and standards:
 Noise-generating construction activities from the City’s construction contractor shall be restricted consistent with the City’s Noise Ordinance (Monday through Friday from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, and Saturday and Sunday from 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM);  All construction equipment shall have sound-control devices no less effective than those provided on the original equipment. No equipment shall have an unmuffled exhaust; and  Appropriate additional noise-reducing measures shall be implemented, including the following: stationary construction equipment shall be located as far as possible from sensitive uses; sensitive uses shall be identified on construction drawings; and excessive equipment idling shall be prohibited when the equipment is not in use.

2.4.1.3 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Measures
The construction documents shall identify materials that are considered hazardous. The project contractor shall be required to develop a Health and Safety Plan (prepared by a registered industrial hygienist) that addresses release prevention measures; employee training, notification, and evacuation procedures; and adequate emergency response protocols and cleanup procedures.

The contractor shall comply with the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards for the storage and handling of fuels, flammable materials, and common construction-related hazardous materials and for fire prevention (California Labor Code, Division 5, Chapter 2.5).

2.4.2 City of Roseville Mitigating Ordinances
As part of the proposed project, the City shall implement the following regulations and ordinances to reduce potential environmental impacts associated with the project:
 Noise Regulation (Roseville Municipal Code [RMC] Ch.9.24);  Urban Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (RMC Ch.14.20);
 Stormwater Quality Design Manual (Resolution 07-432);  City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards (Resolution 07-137); and  Community Design Guidelines (Resolution 95-347).

City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
2-10
July 2022

2.5 Required Entitlements
Required permits and approvals are shown in Table 2-1. Local approvals required to construct and operate the proposed project include adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan by the City Council and approval of the project plans and specifications and construction contract. The City must also submit applications to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to reflect the new site coordinates.

Table 2-1: Permits and Approvals Needed for the Proposed Project Agency Permit/Approval
City of Roseville Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Roseville Approval of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan City of Roseville Approval of Plans and Specifications and Construction Contract FCC Approval of New Site Coordinates
FAA Approval of New Site Coordinates
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-1
July 2022
Chapter 3
Environmental Checklist

1. Project Title: East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project

2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Terri Shirhall
Environmental Coordinator
Development Services Department
(916) 774-5362

4. Project Location: The project site, identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number 048-260-032, is located east of the intersection of
Strauch Drive and Huntington Drive in the City of
Roseville, CA.

5. Project Sponsor’s Name and
Address:

City of Roseville Department of Information Technology
Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer, Information
Technology
316 Vernon Street, Suite 300
Roseville, CA 95678

6. General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC)

7. Zoning: Planned Development (PD7)

8. Description of Project:

The proposed project would include the development of a portion of the project site with a 180-foottall radio communications tower, a 12-foot by 16-foot shelter, a 60-kiloWatt emergency generator, and 500-gallon propane tank. An access driveway would be provided from the parking lot of the adjacent property to the east. Ground disturbing activities associated with construction of the proposed project would be limited to establishing the tower foundation, assembly of the tower and shelter, and worker vehicle circulation.

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

The site contains several species of trees, including oak, along the perimeter of the site, and a drainage feature crosses the western portion of the site. Surrounding existing land uses include shopping centers with a variety of retail and commercial uses to the north, east, and southeast; undeveloped land to the south and southwest, across Strauch Drive; and shopping centers to the west and northwest, across Strauch Drive.

10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required:

None.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-2
July 2022

11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation begun?
On March 29, 2022, the City of Roseville sent certified letters to the Tribes listed below requesting consultation and/or information regarding tribal resources in the project area. The letters requested a response within 30 days. The United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria (UAIC) initiated consultation on June 3, 2022, and consultation was closed with mutual agreement on July 7, 2022. Wilton Rancheria also requested consultation on May 3, 2022, but did not respond to the City’s attempts at communication, therefore the City closed consultation on July 8, 2022. • United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria; • Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians;
• Tsi Akim Maidu;
• Ione Band of Miwok Indians; and
• Wilton Rancheria.

3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would potentially be affected by this project (i.e., the project would involve at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact”), as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agricultural and
Forestry
Air Quality Biological Resources
Cultural Resources Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards and
Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water
Quality
Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise
Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities/Service
Systems
Mandatory Findings
of Significance

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-4
July 2022

3.2.1 Aesthetics
I. Aesthetics
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings along a
scenic highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that
are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage point). If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare that would adversely affect daytime or
nighttime views in the area?

3.2.1.1 Discussion
a,b. Examples of typical scenic vistas include mountain ranges, ridgelines, or bodies of water as viewed from a highway, public space, or other area designated for the express purpose of viewing and sightseeing. Per the City’s General Plan EIR, the City’s Panning Area does not contain any scenic vistas or any designated or eligible State scenic highways. Thus, the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista or substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway, and no impact would occur.
c. The project is located in an urbanized area of the City of Roseville; therefore, in accordance with CEQA question ‘c’, the relevant threshold is whether the project would conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality, rather than whether the project would substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings. Nonetheless, photo simulations of the proposed project have been prepared, and are included as Figure 3-1 and Figure 3-2.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-5
July 2022
Figure 3-1
Views from Strauch Drive Looking Northwest
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-6
July 2022
Figure 3-2
Views from Douglas Boulevard Looking Southeast
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-7
July 2022
As shown in Figure 3-1 and Figure 3-2, the visual landscape of the surrounding area is characterized by commercial development, with shopping centers to the west, north, and east, and undeveloped land to the south. The proposed radio communications tower would stand approximately 180 feet above ground level. Public views of the top of the tower would be available from Douglas Boulevard from the north, Rocky Ridge Drive from the east, and Strauch Drive from the south. As shown in the photo simulations, the base of the tower and the communications building would be screened from public view by the trees along Strauch Drive, and the commercial buildings to the north and east. Given the urbanized and commercial nature of the area, the proposed project would be generally consistent with the visual character of the project vicinity.

According to Section 19.34.010 of the RMC, the regulations and prohibitions in Chapter

19.34, Antennas and Communications Facilities, are intended to minimize the adverse impacts of such equipment and structures on neighborhoods and surrounding developments by limiting the height, number, and location of such devices. The proposed project’s required compliance with such would ensure that substantial adverse impacts related to aesthetics do not occur. For example, all wireless communication facilities would be required to be painted colors which are compatible with their surroundings. In addition, a radio communications tower is an allowed use under the CC land use and PD7 zoning designations. Thus, the proposed project would be consistent with applicable zoning and other regulations governing antennas and communications facilities in the City of Roseville.

Based on the above, implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with the project site’s current land use and zoning designations and other regulations governing scenic quality, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. d. The existing nighttime lighting environment in the project area is defined by light from Strauch Drive and the surrounding shopping centers, including sources such as streetlights, headlights from vehicles, lighted street signs, and traffic signals. The proposed radio communications tower has the potential to introduce new sources of light in the project vicinity. The communications building would not be occupied, and thus would not be expected to produce light on a regular basis. The only light associated with the tower itself would most likely be affixed to the radio communication tower’s highest point.

The light source would be located approximately 180 feet in the air, and would be necessary for safety purposes. Thus, the light would not cause a substantial increase in light or glare in the project surroundings.

Based on the above, the proposed radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank, would not substantially alter the existing lighting in the project area. In addition, the tower would comply with all applicable lighting standards established in the RMC. Therefore, the proposed project would result in less-than-significant impacts related to creating a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-8
July 2022

3.2.1.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to aesthetic resources. Therefore, mitigation measures are not necessary.

3.2.1.3 References
Vosney, Jack, President for Advancesim Inc. Personal Communication [email] with Rod Stinson, Vice President of Raney Planning & Management, Inc. June 28, 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-9
July 2022

3.2.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources
II. Agricultural and Forestry Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use or conflict with a Williamson Act
contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code Section 51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use?
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment that, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?

3.2.2.1 Discussion
a-e. The project site currently consists of undeveloped ruderal grassland, as well as several trees along the site perimeter, and drainage feature. According to the California Department of Conservation’s Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, the project site is designated as “Urban and Built-Up Land” and does not contain any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Thus, the project site would not be converted from Farmland to non-agricultural uses as a result of the proposed project.

The project site is currently designated CC per the City’s General Plan and zoned PD7.

Consequently, the project site is not zoned for agricultural uses, and the site is not under a Williamson Act Contract. Forest land and timberland do not occur within the City of Roseville. Thus, the project site is not considered forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220[g]) and is not zoned for Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104[g]). Overall, the proposed project would result in no impact to agricultural and forestry resources.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-10
July 2022

3.2.2.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to agricultural and forestry resources. Therefore, mitigation measures are not necessary.

3.2.2.3 References
California Department of Conservation. 2016. California Important Farmland Finder.

Available: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. Accessed April 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-11
July 2022

3.2.3 Air Quality
III. Air Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
When available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.

Would the project:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b. Cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is a
nonattainment area for an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard?
c. Exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d. Other emissions (such as those leading to odors)
adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?

3.2.3.1 Discussion
a,b. The project site is located within the Sacramento Valley Air Basin (SVAB) and is under the jurisdiction of the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD). The SVAB is designated nonattainment for the federal particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) and the State particulate matter 10 microns in diameter (PM10) standards, as well as for both the federal and State ozone standards. The federal Clean Air Act requires areas designated as federal nonattainment to prepare an air quality control plan referred to as the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP contains the strategies and control measures for states to use to attain the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).

The SIP is periodically modified to reflect the latest emissions inventories, planning documents, rules, and regulations of air basins as reported by the agencies with jurisdiction over them. In compliance with regulations, the PCAPCD periodically prepares and updates air quality plans that provide emission reduction strategies to achieve attainment of the NAAQS, including control strategies to reduce air pollutant emissions via regulations, incentive programs, public education, and partnerships with other agencies.

The current applicable air quality plan for the project area is the Sacramento Regional 2009 NAAQS 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan (Ozone Attainment Plan), updated July 24, 2017. The Ozone Attainment Plan demonstrates how existing and new control strategies would provide the necessary future emission reductions to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements, including the federal AAQS.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-12
July 2022
The Ozone Attainment Plan demonstrates how existing and new control strategies would provide the necessary future emission reductions to meet the FCAA requirements, including the NAAQS. It should be noted that in addition to strengthening the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) also strengthened the secondary 8-hour ozone NAAQS, making the secondary standard identical to the primary standard. The SVAB remains classified as a severe nonattainment area for ozone with an attainment deadline of 2027. On October 26, 2015, the USEPA released a final implementation rule for the revised NAAQS for ozone to address the requirements for reasonable further progress, modeling and attainment demonstrations, and reasonably available control measures (RACM) and reasonably available control technology (RACT).

On April 30, 2018, the USEPA published designations for areas in attainment/unclassifiable for the 2015 ozone standards. The USEPA identified the portions of Placer County within the SVAB as nonattainment for the 2015 ozone standards. Due to the designation of the SVAB as nonattainment for the 2015 standards, the PCAPCD will work with other regional air districts to prepare a new ozone SIP for the revised 2015 standards.

General conformity requirements of the regional air quality plan include whether a project would cause or contribute to new violations of any AAQS, increase the frequency or severity of an existing violation of any AAQS, or delay timely attainment of any AAQS. In order to evaluate ozone and other criteria air pollutant emissions and support attainment goals for those pollutants that the area is designated nonattainment, the PCAPCD has adopted recommended thresholds of significance for emissions of PM10 and the ozone precursors reactive organic gases (ROG) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX). On October 13, 2016, the PCAPCD adopted updated significance thresholds for the aforementioned pollutants.

The significance thresholds, expressed in pounds per day (lbs/day), listed in Table 3.2.3- 1 are the PCAPCD’s current thresholds of significance for use in the evaluation of air quality impacts associated with proposed development projects. Thus, if the proposed project’s emissions exceed the pollutant thresholds presented in Table 3.2.3-1, the project could have a significant effect on air quality, the attainment of federal and State AAQS, and could conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

Table 3.2.3-1. PCAPCD Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant Construction Threshold (lbs/day) Operational Threshold (lbs/day) ROG 82 55
NOX 82 55
PM10 82 82
Source: Placer County Air Pollution Control District. CEQA Handbook. 2017.

Construction activity associated with the proposed project would be limited to relatively minor ground disturbance to construct the proposed tower foundation, minor utility improvements, and installation of the proposed radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank. Given that such activities would result in relatively minor emissions of criteria pollutants, the proposed project is anticipated to be below the PCAPCD thresholds for construction City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-13
July 2022
emissions. The only emissions that could occur during project operations would be associated with maintenance testing of the emergency generator, and vehicle trips associated with site maintenance and refilling of the on-site propane tank. The emergency generator would only operate for intermittent testing and during emergency situations.

Thus, the proposed project would not result in substantial operational emissions.

Past, present, and future development projects contribute to the region’s adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis. By nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. A single project is not sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of AAQS. Because the proposed project would not result in emissions above the applicable thresholds of significance for ROG, NOX, or PM10, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS.

Because the proposed project would not result in construction-related or operational emissions of criteria air pollutants in excess of PCAPCD’s thresholds of significance, conflicts with or obstruction of the implementation of the applicable regional air quality plans would not occur. In addition, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would result.
c. Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others, due to the types of population groups or activities involved. Heightened sensitivity may be caused by health problems, proximity to the emissions source, and/or duration of exposure to air pollutants. Children, pregnant women, the elderly, and those with existing health problems are especially vulnerable to the effects of air pollution. Sensitive receptors are typically defined as facilities where sensitive receptor population groups (i.e., children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and the chronically ill) are likely to be located. Accordingly, land uses that are typically considered to be sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, retirement homes, convalescent homes, hospitals, and medical clinics. The nearest existing sensitive receptors would be the single-family residences approximately 400 feet west of the project site.

The major pollutant concentrations of concern are localized carbon monoxide (CO) emissions and toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions.

Localized Carbon Monoxide Emissions
As discussed in Section 3.2.17, Transportation, of this IS/MND, the proposed project is not anticipated to increase traffic to local roadways except during the construction period.

Increases in vehicle traffic resulting from the proposed project would be minor and would only occur during the installation of the proposed radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank. As such, based on the PCAPCD screening criteria, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to localized CO emissions concentrations and would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of localized CO.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-14
July 2022
TAC Emissions
Another category of environmental concern is TACs. The CARB’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective (Handbook) provides recommended setback distances for sensitive land uses from major sources of TACs, including, but not limited to, freeways and high traffic roads, distribution centers, and rail yards. The CARB has identified diesel particulate matter (DPM) from diesel-fueled engines as a TAC; thus, high volume freeways, stationary diesel engines, and facilities attracting heavy and constant diesel vehicle traffic are identified as having the highest associated health risks from DPM. Health risks associated with TACs are a function of both the concentration of emissions and the duration of exposure, where the higher the concentration and/or the longer the period of time that a sensitive receptor is exposed to pollutant concentrations would correlate to a higher health risk.

The proposed project does not include any operations that would be considered a substantial source of TACs. As noted previously, an emergency generator would exist onsite. Diesel-powered generators are known to emit DPM during operations. However, the emergency generator would be fueled by propane, and would only operate during occasional testing and emergency situations when grid power is not available.

Accordingly, operations of the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to excess concentrations of TACs.

Short-term, construction-related activities could result in the generation of TACs, specifically DPM, from on-road haul trucks and off-road equipment exhaust emissions.

Construction is temporary and occurs over a relatively short duration in comparison to the operational lifetime of the proposed project. Health risks are typically associated with exposure to high concentrations of TACs over extended periods of time (e.g., 30 years or greater), whereas the construction period associated with the proposed project would occur over a substantially shorter period of time. All construction equipment and operation thereof would be regulated per the In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation, which is intended to help reduce emissions associated with off-road diesel vehicles and equipment, including DPM. Project construction would also be required to comply with all applicable PCAPCD rules and regulations, particularly associated with permitting of air pollutant sources.

Due to the temporary nature of construction, and the relatively short duration of potential exposure to associated emissions, the potential for any one sensitive receptor in the area to be exposed to concentrations of pollutants for a substantially extended period of time would be low. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would not be expected to expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

Conclusion
Based on the above, the proposed project would not expose any sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of pollutants, including localized CO or TACs, during construction or operation. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-thansignificant impact related to the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-15
July 2022
D. Emissions of pollutants have the potential to adversely affect sensitive receptors within the project area. Pollutants of principal concern include emissions leading to odors, emissions of dust, or emissions considered to constitute air pollutants. Air pollutants have been discussed in sections “a” through “c” above. Therefore, the following discussion focuses on emissions of odors and dust during construction and operation of the project.

Odors
Odors are generally regarded as an annoyance rather than a health hazard. Due to the subjective nature of odor impacts, the number of variables that can influence the potential for an odor impact, and the variety of odor sources, quantitative methodologies to determine the presence of a significant odor impact do not exist. Certain land uses such as wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, confined animal facilities, composting operations, food manufacturing plants, refineries, and chemical plants have the potential to generate considerable odors.

Diesel fumes from construction equipment and heavy-duty trucks could be found to be objectionable; however, as addressed above, operation of construction equipment would be regulated by PCAPCD rules and regulations, restricted to certain hours per the RMC, and would occur intermittently throughout the course of a day. All construction equipment and operation thereof would be regulated per the statewide In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation. In addition, construction is temporary, and construction equipment would operate intermittently throughout the course of a day and would likely only occur over portions of the improvement area at a time. For the aforementioned reasons, and due to the distance between the project site and the nearest sensitive receptors, the project would not result in any noticeable objectionable odors associated with construction.

Although offensive odors rarely cause any physical harm, they can be unpleasant, leading to citizen complaints to local governments and air districts. Diesel-powered equipment operating during construction may generate odors that are evident in the immediately surrounding area. Such activities would be intermittent and temporary in duration and, therefore, would not result in nuisance odors. Radio communications towers are not known to emit odors during operation, and the project does not meet any of the facility types identified by CARB or PCAPCD as odor-generating; thus, the project would not generate substantial operational odors. Accordingly, the proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people.

Dust
As noted previously, construction of projects within Placer County are required to comply with all applicable PCAPCD rules and regulations. The aforementioned rules would act to reduce construction-related dust by implementing dust control measures. PCAPCD Rule 228 requires implementation of dust control measures, such as minimizing track-out on to paved public roadways, limiting vehicle travel on unpaved surfaces to 15 miles per hour, and stabilization of storage piles and disturbed areas. Following construction, operation of the proposed radio communications tower would not involve vehicles regularly operating within the project site. Furthermore, the access road is anticipated to be paved and, City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-16
July 2022
therefore, maintenance vehicles visiting the site would not generate substantial dust.

Thus, the proposed project operations would not include sources of dust that could adversely affect a substantial number of people.

Conclusion
For the aforementioned reasons, construction and operation of the proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people, and impacts would be less than significant.

3.2.3.2 Mitigation Measures
Due to the short duration of construction, and minimal ground disturbance, the proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts on air quality. Therefore, mitigation measures are not necessary.

3.2.3.3 References
California Air Resources Board. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April 2005.

California Air Resources Board. 2020. Area Designations Maps. Available at:
<http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm>. Accessed October 2021.

Placer County Air Pollution Control District. 2017 CEQA Handbook. November 2017.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-17
July 2022

3.2.4 Biological Resources
IV. Biological Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special-status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Wildlife
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a
tree preservation policy or ordinance
(including essential fish habitat)?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
habitat conservation plan, natural community
conservation plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?

3.2.4.1 Discussion
a. The project site currently consists of ruderal grasses and several trees. A search of the Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) was conducted for the project area to identify the presence of special-status species.

According to the CNDDB search, a total of 17 special-status wildlife species are known to occur in the project area.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-18
July 2022
As noted previously, the project site is regularly disced for vegetation maintenance. The regular disturbance associated with discing eliminates the possibility that special-status plant species would occur on the project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not adversely affect special-status plant species.

Of the 17 special-status wildlife species that are known to occur in the project area, four have the potential to occur on the project site based on the habitat available on-site.

Because the proposed project could involve the removal of trees, special-status bird species that nest in trees would have the potential to be impacted during construction. The nesting bird species with the potential to occur on the project site are the Swainson’s hawk, grasshopper sparrow, golden eagle, and white-tailed kite. As such, a potentially significant impact could occur to nesting bird species. However, implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce such impacts to a less-than-significant level.

Based on the above, with implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse effect to any special-status species; thus, the impact would be considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b,c,d,f. A drainage feature exists in the western portion of the project site. The drainage is intermittent and seasonal, and does not qualify as wetland or as supporting riparian habitat. Furthermore, implementation of the project would occur on the eastern portion of the project site and, thus, the project would not affect the on-site drainage. In addition, the project site does not support any wildlife movement corridors, and is located in a highly urbanized area. The project site and the surrounding areas do not contain waterways that could be used by migratory fish or as a wildlife corridor for other wildlife species. The project would not conflict with the City’s Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan, or would otherwise impact habitat areas subject to regulatory oversight.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse effect to protected riparian habitats or wetlands, would not interfere with the movement of fish or wildlife species, and would not conflict with any conservation plan; thus, a less-thansignificant impact would occur. e. Several trees exist on the project site. Buildout of the proposed project has the potential to involve the removal of one or more of the trees. However, through compliance with Section 19.66.030 of the RMC (Tree Preservation Ordinance), which delineates the permits required for the removal of trees, and required replacement either via tree planting or contribution to the City’s Tree Mitigation Fund, the proposed project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources.

Given compliance with the applicable local regulations regarding tree removal, the project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to conflict with local tree preservation policies.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-19
July 2022

3.2.4.2 Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Implement Measures to Protect Protected Bird Species If tree removal or other ground-disturbing activities are to begin during the breeding/nesting season for raptors or other protected bird species in the region (generally February 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall be retained by the City to conduct pre-construction surveys in areas of suitable nesting habitat within two weeks prior to initiation of tree removal or ground disturbance. The pre-construction surveys shall be submitted to the City’s Planning Division. If active nests are not found, further mitigation is not required. If active nests are found, the construction contractor shall avoid impacts on such nests by establishing a no-disturbance buffer around the nest. The appropriate buffer size for all nesting birds shall be determined by a qualified biologist. Buffer size will vary depending on site-specific conditions, the species of nesting bird, nature of the project activity, the extent of existing disturbance in the area, visibility of the disturbance from the nest site, and other relevant circumstances. Construction activity shall not occur within the buffer area of an active nest and nests shall be monitored by a qualified biologist until a qualified biologist confirms that the chicks have fledged and are no longer dependent on the nest, or the nesting cycle has otherwise completed. Monitoring of the nest by a qualified biologist during construction activities shall be required if the activity has the potential to adversely affect the nest.

3.2.4.3 References
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. CNDDB Rarefind 5. Available at:
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data. Accessed April 2022.

Placer County. Placer County Conservation Program. Available at:
https://www.placer.ca.gov/3362/Placer-County-Conservation-Program. Accessed April 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-20
July 2022

3.2.5 Cultural Resources
V. Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
c. Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?

3.2.5.1 Discussion
a-c. Historical resources are features that are associated with the lives of historically important persons and/or historically significant events, that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important to the pre-history or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Examples of typical historical resources include, but are not limited to, buildings, farmsteads, rail lines, bridges, and trash scatters containing objects such as colored glass and ceramics.

The proposed project would involve the installation of a radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank.

Ground disturbing activities associated with implementation of the proposed project would be limited to construction of the foundations of the tower and associated building, assembly of the tower and shelter, as well as construction of an access roadway. Given that the project site is located in an urbanized area, the discovery of previously-unknown historical resources during the limited ground disturbance associated with the proposed project is not anticipated.

A records search for the project site and the surrounding 0.25-mile radius was conducted by staff at the North Central Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System on April 7, 2022. The records search indicated that seven previous cultural resources studies have been conducted within the search area. The records search did not identify any recorded cultural resources on the project site or within the

0.25-mile radius.

Furthermore, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted on April 6, 2022, to request a search of its Sacred Lands File and a list of interested Native American tribes and individuals. The results of the NAHC’s Sacred Lands File search did not indicate the presence of any known cultural resources on the project site. Assembly City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-21
July 2022
Bill (AB 52) tribal consultation efforts under CEQA were carried out by the City of Roseville and additional information is provided in Section 3.2.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, of this Environmental Checklist.

Due to previous disturbance of the site associated with regular discing of on-site vegetation, and the limited extent of ground disturbance associated with the proposed project, the likelihood of discovering previously unknown historical or archaeological resources and/or human remains is low. However, the possibility exists that grounddisturbing activities during construction may uncover previously unknown subsurface cultural resources; such disturbance would be a potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 would reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level.

Based on the above, with implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical or archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5, and would not result in the disturbance of human remains; thus, the impact would be considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

3.2.5.2 Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Implement Measures to Protect Previously Unidentified Cultural Resources
The City shall ensure that construction specifications include the following information in the grading notes:
 Construction shall stop if potential cultural resources are encountered. It is possible that previous activities have obscured surface evidence of cultural resources. If signs of an archeological site, such as any unusual amounts of stone, bone, or shell, are uncovered during grading or other construction activities, work shall be halted within 100 feet of the find and the City of Roseville will be notified. A qualified archeologist shall be consulted for an onsite evaluation. If the site appears to be eligible for listing in State or federal registers, additional mitigation, such as further testing for evaluation or data recovery, may be necessary.
 In the event resources are discovered, the City shall retain a qualified archaeologist to assess the find and to determine whether the resource requires further study. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction shall be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms and evaluated for significance under all applicable regulatory criteria.  All work shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find, and, if the find is determined to be an important cultural resource, the City shall make available contingency funding and a time allotment sufficient to allow recovery of an archaeological sample or to implement an avoidance measure. Construction work may continue on other parts of the project while archaeological mitigation takes place.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-22
July 2022
Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Implement Measures if Construction Activities Inadvertently Discover or Disturb Human Remains
The City shall ensure that construction specifications include the following in the grading notes:
 If human remains are discovered during any phase of construction, including disarticulated or cremated remains, the construction contractor shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within 100 feet of the remains and notify the City of Roseville.
 In accordance with California State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall occur until the following steps have been completed:
 The County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.
 If the remains are determined by the County Coroner to be Native American, NAHC will be notified within 24 hours, and the treatment and disposition of the remains will comply with NAHC guidelines.
 It is further recommended that a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant (MLD), if any, identified by NAHC. As necessary and appropriate, a professional archaeologist may provide technical assistance to the MLD, including excavation and removal of the human remains.

3.2.5.3 References
Native American Heritage Commission. Strauch Drive Radio Communications Tower Project, Placer County. April 19, 2022.

North Central Information Center. Records Search Results for Strauch Drive Radio Communications Tower Project; NCIC File No.: PLA-22-35. April 7, 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-23
July 2022

3.2.6 Energy
VI. Energy
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or operation?
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?

3.2.6.1 Discussion
a,b. The main forms of available energy supply are electricity, natural gas, and oil. A description of the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code and the Building Energy Efficiency Standards, with which the proposed project would be required to comply, as well as discussions regarding the proposed project’s potential effects related to energy demand during construction and operations are provided below.

The 2019 California Building Standards Code (CBSC), otherwise known as the CAL Green Code (California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 24, Part 11), became effective on January 1, 2020. The purpose of the CAL Green Code is to improve public health, safety, and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a reduced negative impact or positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices. The CBSC standards regulate the method of use, properties, performance, types of materials used in construction, alteration repair, improvement and rehabilitation of a structure or improvement to property.

Construction
Construction of the proposed project would involve on-site energy demand and consumption related to the use of oil in the form of gasoline and diesel fuel for construction worker vehicle trips, and hauling and material delivery truck trips. In addition, diesel-fueled portable generators may be necessary to provide additional electricity demands for temporary on-site lighting, welding, and for supplying energy to areas of the site where energy supply cannot be met via a hookup to the existing electricity grid. Project construction would not involve the use of natural gas appliances or equipment.

Compliance with local, State, and federal regulations, which limit engine idling times and require recycling construction debris, would reduce short-term energy demand during the project’s construction to the extent feasible and project construction would not result in a wasteful or inefficient use of energy.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-24
July 2022
The CARB has prepared the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update (2017 Scoping Plan), which builds upon previous efforts to reduce GHG emissions and is designed to continue to shift the California economy away from dependence on fossil fuels. Appendix B of the 2017 Scoping Plan includes examples of local actions (municipal code changes, zoning changes, policy directions, and mitigation measures) that would support the State’s climate goals. The examples provided include, but are not limited to, enforcing idling time restrictions for construction vehicles, utilizing existing grid power for electric energy rather than operating temporary gasoline/diesel-powered generators, and increasing use of electric and renewable fuel-powered construction equipment.

Based on the above, the temporary increase in energy use occurring during construction of the proposed project would not result in a significant increase in peak or base demands or require additional capacity from local or regional energy supplies.

Operational
State and local authorities regulate energy use and consumption through various means and programs. Regulations at the State level are intended to reduce energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The proposed project would comply with these regulations that include, among others, AB 1493–Light-duty Vehicle Standards, CCR Title 24, Part 6–Energy Efficiency Standards, and CCR Title 24.

Following implementation of the proposed project, Roseville Electric Utility would provide electricity to the project site. Apart from electricity consumed as part of the daily operation of the proposed radio communications tower, the only other energy required by the project would be for the propane-fueled backup generator, which would run only in emergency situations and/or during brief maintenance tests occurring periodically. Operations of a backup generator in emergency situations would not be considered unnecessary and/or wasteful.

Electricity supplied to the project by Roseville Electric Utility would comply with the State’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which requires investor-owned utilities, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators to increase procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 60 percent by 2030. Thus, a portion of the energy consumed during project operations would originate from renewable sources.

Conclusion
Based on the above, construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources or conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Thus, a lessthan-significant impact would occur.

3.2.6.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to energy; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-25
July 2022

3.2.6.3 References
California Air Resources Board. 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. January 20, 2017.

California Building Standards Commission. California Green Building Standards Code. 2019.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-26
July 2022

3.2.7 Geology and Soils
VII. Geology and Soils
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:

Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.

Strong seismic ground shaking?
Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss
of topsoil?
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable or that would become unstable as a
result of the project and potentially result in
an onsite or offsite landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or
collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems in
areas where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?

3.2.7.1 Discussion
a-d. Per the City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update EIR, the City is located in an area with relatively low seismic activity, and fault traces are not located either within or immediately adjacent to the City’s Planning Area. The project site is not located within a State- City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-27
July 2022
designated Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone. The nearest active faults are the Cordelia Fault and Green Valley Fault, located approximately 60 miles southwest of the project site, and the Hunting Creek Fault, located approximately 60 miles west of the project site. Thus, the potential for fault rupture risk at the project site is low.

An earthquake of moderate to high magnitude generated by the above faults could cause considerable ground shaking at the project site. However, the proposed project would be properly engineered in accordance with the CBSC, which includes engineering standards appropriate for the seismic area in which the project site is located. Proper engineering of the proposed project would ensure that the project would not be subject to substantial risks related to seismic ground shaking.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service’s Web Soil Survey, soils at the project site have been identified as 96.7 percent CometaFiddyment complex, and 3.3 percent Inks-Exchequer complex. The on-site soils have a low shrink-swell potential, and were not determined to have low strength. Thus, the aforementioned soil features do not represent a significant limitation related to the excavation required to construct the foundation for the proposed radio communication tower. Nonetheless, prior to development of the proposed project, a project-specific geotechnical report would be prepared in order to ensure that all geological hazards are adequately addressed. Thus, the aforementioned soil features do not represent a significant limitation on the shallow excavation required to construct the foundation for the proposed project.

Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which granular material is transformed from a solid state to a liquefied state as a consequence of increased pore-water pressure and reduced effective stress. Per the Web Soil Survey, Cometa-Fiddyment complex and InksExchequer complex are considered well-draining soils and, thus, liquefaction is not anticipated to occur on the project site. Seismically-induced landslides are triggered by earthquake ground shaking. Lateral spreading and subsidence are also geological hazards of concern; however, the project site is generally flat and not located near an active fault zone or soils subject to such hazards, and, thus, implementation of the proposed project on the project site would not induce risks associated with liquefaction, landslide, lateral spreading, or subsidence.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not be subject to substantial risks related to liquefaction, landslides, lateral spreading, and subsidence/settlement. Compliance with standard construction regulations included in the CBSC would ensure that the proposed project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving liquefaction, subsidence, or settlement, and would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur. e. The construction or operation of septic tanks or other alternative wastewater disposal systems is not included as part of the project. Therefore, no impact regarding the capability of soil to adequately support the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would occur.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-28
July 2022
f. As previously discussed, the project site is located in an urbanized and highly disturbed area, and the proposed project would not result in substantial ground disturbing activities.

In addition, the City of Roseville General Plan EIR evaluated buildout of the entire General Plan, and found that impacts related to paleontological resources and unique geological resources would be less-than-significant with the implementation of mitigation. Thus, additional implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and CUL-2 would ensure that significant impacts do not occur. Therefore, the project would not result in directly or indirectly destroying paleontological resources and a less-than-significant impact would occur.

3.2.7.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to geology and soils; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.

3.2.7.3 References
California Geological Survey. 2019. EQ Zapp: California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application. Available: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/. Accessed April 2022.

City of Roseville. 2035 General Plan Update Final EIR. August 5, 2020.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service. Web Soil Survey.

Available at: https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.

Accessed April 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-29
July 2022

3.2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?

3.2.8.1 Discussion
a,b. Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. Therefore, the cumulative global emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change can be attributed to every nation, region, and city, and virtually every individual on Earth. An individual project’s GHG emissions are at a micro-scale level relative to global emissions and effects to global climate change; however, an individual project could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to a significant cumulative macro-scale impact. As such, impacts related to emissions of GHG are inherently considered cumulative impacts.

Implementation of the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to increases of GHG emissions. Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of carbon dioxide (CO2) and, to a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) associated with area sources, mobile sources or vehicles, and utilities (electricity and natural gas). The primary source of GHG emissions for the project would be mobile source emissions during construction. The common unit of measurement for GHG is expressed in terms of annual metric tons of CO2 equivalents (MTCO2e/yr).

As discussed in Section 3.2.3, Air Quality, the PCAPCD has the primary responsibility for air quality management in Placer County. PCAPCD has adopted a de minimis threshold of 1,100 MTCO2e/yr for operation of land use development projects, such as new residential and commercial projects. The PCAPCD also has a bright line threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e, where land use development projects in excess of the de minimis threshold (1,100 MTCO2e) can be found less than cumulatively considerable if the emission intensity (emissions per capita) meets certain criteria.

It should be noted that construction GHG emissions are a one-time release and are, therefore, not typically expected to generate a significant contribution to global climate change. Construction activities associated with implementation of the proposed project would include constructing a foundation, assembly of the proposed radio communications City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-30
July 2022
tower and associated shelter, and installation of the access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank. Because the use of heavy equipment would be limited and the overall construction period would be short in comparison to other development projects in the City, the emissions of construction-related GHG would be less than significant.

During operations, the only GHG emissions associated with the proposed project would be emissions associated with electricity generation necessary to power the proposed radio communications tower, as well as use of the propane-powered emergency backup generator. The electricity generated by Roseville Electric Utility would comply with the State RPS and, thus, would be carbon neutral by the year 2045. In addition, the proposed radio communications tower would not result in a change to regional vehicle miles travelled (VMT). Consequently, operation and maintenance of the proposed project would not result in significant emissions of GHGs.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not be considered to generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, or conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur.

3.2.8.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in significant impacts related to GHG emissions; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.

3.2.8.3 References
Placer County Air Pollution Control District. 2017 CEQA Handbook. November 2017.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-31
July 2022

3.2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site that is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land
use plan area or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, be within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, and result
in a safety hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in the project
area?
f. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
g. Expose people or structures, either directly
or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss,
injury, or death involving wildland fires?

3.2.9.1 Discussion
a,b. During both construction and operations, the proposed radio communications tower, associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank would not require the routine transport, use, disposal, or generation of substantial amounts of hazardous materials and chemicals that would represent a substantial risk to public health City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-32
July 2022
or the environment. A 500-gallon propane tank would be present on the project site.

According to the HUD Exchange Acceptable Separation Distance Assessment Tool, which is a standardized tool that can be used for evaluating impacts associated with aboveground storage tanks, the acceptable separation distance (ASD) of the propane tank for thermal radiation for people is approximately 207 feet, and the ASD for thermal radiation for buildings is approximately 36 feet. Because the nearest building is approximately 100 feet away from the project site, and the nearest single-family residences are approximately 400 feet from the project site, adverse impacts associated with the proposed propane tank would not occur. In addition, given compliance with CCR Section 4650, Storage, Handling, and Use of Cylinders, which delineates the appropriate storage of propane gas, the propane tank would not result in a significant environmental impact.

Construction activities associated with the proposed project would involve the use of heavy equipment, which would contain fuels and oils, and various other products such as concrete, paints, and adhesives. Small quantities of potentially toxic substances (e.g., petroleum and other chemicals used to operate and maintain construction equipment) would be used at the project site and transported to and from the site during construction.

However, the project contractor would be required to comply with all California Health and Safety Codes and local City ordinances regulating the handling, storage, and transportation of hazardous and toxic materials. Thus, construction of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment.

During project operation, the proposed tower would emit radio frequency electromagnetic energy (RF-EME) in the project vicinity. For RF-EME sources such as the proposed antennas, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. The MPE limits for RF-EME emissions are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. The limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health.

Importantly, Section 332, subdivision (c)(7)(B)(iv), of the Telecommunications Act provides:

No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless services facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.

As presented above, federal telecommunications jurisprudence has established that municipalities cannot regulate in the area of RF-EME emissions in any way.

The proposed project would not be manned during operations. As such, the project would not result in occupational exposures to RF-EME emissions. With respect to the general public, personal communication facilities (PCF) operate within a frequency range of 700 City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-33
July 2022
to 1,900 megahertz (MHz). PCFs typically consist of: (1) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and (2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCF telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by way of coaxial cables.

Because of the short wavelength of PCF services, the antennas require line-of-site paths for good propagation and are typically installed aboveground. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or sky. Such a design, combined with the low-power PCFs, generally eliminates the possibility for exposure to approach MPE levels allowed under the FCC, with the exception of areas directly in front of the antennas. Given that the antennas would be installed at the top of the proposed 180-foot tower, the general public would not be exposed to MPE levels of RF-EME emissions.

Based on the above, the proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable provisions of the California Health and Safety Code, CCR Section 4650, and the FCC. In addition, development of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment, and a less-thansignificant impact would occur. c. The closest school to the project site is Warren T. Eich Middle School, located approximately 0.5-mile southwest of the project site. Thus, the project site is not located within a quarter mile of any existing or proposed schools. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact related to hazardous emissions or the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.
d. According to the Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Envirostor Database, the project site is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Thus, the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment related to being located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and no impact would occur. e. The nearest airport to the project site is the Sacramento McClellan Airport, located approximately 10 miles southwest of the project site. Thus, the project site is not located within two miles of any public airports, and does not fall within an airport land use plan area. Therefore, no impact would occur related to the project being located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, thereby resulting in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area.
f. The proposed project would involve the installation of a radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank.

The proposed access roadway would be private and would be constructed in compliance with all State and local regulations; thus, the access roadway would not adversely affect emergency access or emergency evacuation efforts. As a result, the project would result in a less-than-significant impact with respect to impairing the implementation of or City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-34
July 2022
physically interfering with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
g. Issues related to wildfire hazards are discussed in Section 3.2.20, Wildfire, of this IS/MND.

As noted therein, the project site is not located within or near a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). In addition, the project site is located within a developed area of the City and, thus, is not particularly susceptible to wildland fire.

Project construction would involve the use of heavy equipment, welding, and other activities that have the potential to ignite fires. Malfunction of equipment that could cause a fire is extremely unlikely during project construction. However, the contractor would comply with Cal-OSHA standards for the storage and handling of fuels, flammable materials, and common construction-related hazardous materials and for fire prevention.

In addition, the project would meet the minimum standards set forth by Public Resources Code Section 4290, Title 14, for fire protection and emergency water standards.

Compliance with the aforementioned regulations would ensure that the potential for wildland fires is reduced to the maximum extent feasible.

Based on the above, the potential for wildland fires to reach the project site would be limited. Based on the above, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.

3.2.9.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.

3.2.9.3 References
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer.

Available at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. Accessed April 2022.

California Department of Industrial Relations. California Code of Regulations Section 4650. Storage, Handling, and Use of Cylinders. Available at:
https://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/4650.html#:~:text=(b)%20Inside%20of%20buildings%2C ,such%20as%20oil%20or%20excelsior. Accessed May 2022.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2020. Cortese List: Section 65962.5(a). Available at: https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/section-65962- 5a/. Accessed April 2022.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2020. EnviroStor Hazardous Waste and Substance Site List (Cortese). Available at:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?global_id=31400006. Accessed April 2022.

City of Roseville. 2017. Location of Roseville Fire Stations. Roseville, California. Available at: https://www.roseville.ca.us/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-35
July 2022
/Departments/Fire%20Dept/Fire%20Station%20Locations/Location%20of%20Rosevi lle%20Fire%20Stations%20-%202017.pdf. Accessed April 2022.

EBI Consulting. Radio Frequency – Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report. August 4, 2020.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Acceptable Separation Distance Electronic Assessment Tool. Available at:
https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/asd-calculator/.

Accessed June 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-36
July 2022

3.2.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
X. Hydrology and Water Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground
water quality?
b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces in a manner which would:
i. result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site;
ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or offsite;
iii. create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted
runoff; or
iv.impede or redirect flood flows?
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?

3.2.10.1 Discussion
a. As noted previously, the project would not include substantial ground disturbing activities.

The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) regulates stormwater discharges associated with construction activities where clearing, grading, or excavation results in a land disturbance of one or more acres. Given that the proposed project would disturb less than one acre of land, the proposed construction activities would not be subject to City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-37
July 2022
applicable SWRCB regulations. The ground disturbance associated with the proposed project would be minimal and would occur over a short period of time, and the contractor would be required to comply with the City BMPs listed in Section 2.4 of this document.

Such BMPs include erosion control and hazardous material control measures that would ensure that adverse impacts related to stormwater discharge and water quality would not occur. Thus, the proposed project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not substantially degrade surface water quality or conflict with any applicable water quality control or management plans. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur.
b,e. The City of Roseville’s groundwater is derived from the North American Subbasin, which is part of the Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin. New impervious surfaces created by the project would be limited to a relatively small foundation necessary to support the proposed structures, and the project would not include any water use. Thus, the project would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge within the North American Subbasin.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not substantially degrade groundwater quality or substantially interfere with groundwater recharge, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
ci-iii. The proposed project is not anticipated to create a substantial amount of new impervious surfaces on the project site. The proposed impervious surfaces would be limited to a concrete foundation supporting the proposed radio communications tower, associated shelter, emergency generator, and propane tank, as well as the access roadway.

Furthermore, only a small portion of the soil would be exposed during construction of the project and, thus, the project would not result in substantial erosion or siltation.

Consequently, the proposed project would not substantially increase stormwater runoff relative to existing conditions. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-thansignificant impact related to soil erosion, surface runoff, and stormwater drainage. civ. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map for the project site, the project site is located within an Area of Minimal Flood Hazard (Zone X). The site is not classified as a Special Flood Hazard Area or otherwise located within a 100-year or 500-year floodplain. Therefore, development of the proposed project would not impede or redirect flood flows and no impact would result. d. As discussed under question ‘civ’ above, the project site is not located within a flood hazard zone. Tsunamis are defined as sea waves created by undersea fault movement, whereas a seiche is a long-wavelength, large-scale wave action set up in a closed body of water such as a lake or reservoir. The project site is not located in proximity to a coastline and would not be potentially affected by flooding risks associated with tsunamis.

Seiches do not pose a risk to the proposed project, as the project site is not located adjacent to a large, closed body of water. Based on the above, the proposed project would not pose a risk related to the release of pollutants due to project inundation due to flooding, tsunami, or seiche, and no impact would occur.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-38
July 2022

3.2.10.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.

3.2.10.3 References
California Department of Water Resources. 2018. DWR Groundwater Basin Boundary Assessment Tool (BBAT). Available at: https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/bbat/. Accessed April 2022.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2018. National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer. Map Number 06061C1032H. Available: https://www.fema.gov/floodmaps/national-flood-hazard-layer. Accessed April 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-39
July 2022

3.2.11 Land Use and Planning
XI. Land Use and Planning
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Physically divide an established community?
b. Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?

3.2.11.1 Discussion
a. A project risks dividing an established community if the project would introduce infrastructure or alter land use so as to change the land use conditions in the surrounding community or isolate an existing land use. Existing land uses in the project vicinity include shopping centers with a variety of retail and commercial uses to the north, east, and southeast; undeveloped land to the south and southwest, across Strauch Drive; and shopping centers to the west and northwest, across Strauch Drive. In addition, the proposed radio communications tower would encompass a portion of a currently vacant parcel and, thus, would not isolate an existing land use. As such, the proposed project would not physically divide an established community and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
b. The project site is currently designated CC per the City of Roseville’s General Plan, and the site is zoned PD7. The proposed radio communications tower is an allowed use in the PD7 zoning designation, and would be subject to all requirements and standards pursuant to the PD7 district. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the type and intensity of uses anticipated for the site in the General Plan and generally analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Furthermore, as demonstrated throughout this IS/MND, the proposed project would not conflict with City policies and regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.

Based on the above, the project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to conflicts with a land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur.

3.2.11.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to land use and planning. Therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-40
July 2022

3.2.11.3 References
City of Roseville. City of Roseville General Plan 2035. Adopted June 15, 2016. Amended August 17, 2016. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8774544.

Accessed May 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-41
July 2022

3.2.12 Mineral Resources
XII. Mineral Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?

3.2.12.1 Discussion
a,b. Mineral extraction operations do not exist on or adjacent to the project site. Mineral resources are not evaluated in the City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update EIR because the City does not designate any territory within the City for Resource extraction and the City does not overlie any known deposits of economically valuable mineral sources. Additionally, the City does not have a Surface Mining and Reclamation Act permit. Because the project site does not contain mineral resources and the construction of the proposed project would not result in the loss of any known mineral resources, no impact to mineral resources would occur.

3.2.12.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to mineral resources. Therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.

3.2.12.3 References
City of Roseville. 2035 General Plan Update EIR. August 5, 2020. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/development_services/planning /general_plan_development_guidelines. Accessed April 2022.

City of Roseville. City of Roseville General Plan 2035. Adopted June 15, 2016. Amended August 17, 2016. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8774544.

Accessed April 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-42
July 2022

3.2.13 Noise
XIII. Noise
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project result in:
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in a local general plan
or noise ordinance or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?

3.2.13.1 Discussion
a. The following sections present information regarding sensitive noise receptors in proximity to the project site, the existing noise environment, and the potential for the proposed project to result in impacts during project construction and operation. The following term is referenced in the sections below:
• Decibel (dB): A unit of sound energy intensity. An A-weighted decibel (dBA) is a decibel corrected for the variation in frequency response to the typical human ear at commonly encountered noise levels. All references to dB in this section will be A-weighted unless noted otherwise.

Sensitive Noise Receptors
Some land uses are considered more sensitive to noise than others, and, thus, are referred to as sensitive noise receptors. Land uses often associated with sensitive noise receptors generally include residences, schools, libraries, hospitals, and passive recreational areas. Noise sensitive land uses are typically given special attention in order to achieve protection from excessive noise. In the vicinity of the project site, the nearest existing sensitive receptor would be the single-family residences located west of the project site, approximately 400 feet away.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-43
July 2022
Existing Noise Environment
The ambient noise environment in the project vicinity is primarily characterized by vehicle traffic on roadways within the vicinity of the project site, including Douglas Boulevard, Rocky Ridge Drive, and Strauch Drive.

Standards of Significance
Policy N1.9 from the Roseville General Plan Noise Element states that constructionrelated noise that is consistent with the Roseville Noise Ordinance (RMC, Chapter 9.24, Noise Regulation) would be exempt from the noise standards outlined in the Noise Element. Noises resulting from construction activities are prohibited by the RMC, Chapter

9.24, Noise Regulation, during nighttime hours (7:00 PM to 7:00 AM, Monday through Friday, and 8:00 PM to 8:00 AM, Saturday, Sunday and, Holidays). The RMC also specifies that all construction equipment shall be fitted with factory installed muffling devices and that all construction equipment shall be maintained in good working order in order to prevent excessive noise.

Impact Analysis
During construction of the proposed project, heavy equipment would be used on-site, which would result in temporary noise level increases during the construction period.

Noise levels would vary depending on the type of equipment used, how the equipment is operated, and how well the equipment is maintained. Table 3.2.13-1 shows maximum noise levels associated with typical construction equipment.

Table 3.2.13-1. Construction Equipment Noise
Type of Equipment Maximum Level, dB at 50 feet
Backhoe 78
Compressor (air) 78
Excavator 81
Generator 81
Pneumatic Tools 85
Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide, January 2006.

As demonstrated in the table, activities involved in typical construction would generate maximum noise levels up to 85 dB at a distance of 50 feet. Given that the nearest receptors are located approximately 400 feet from the project site, noise levels at the nearest receptors would be significantly reduced from the levels presented above.

Furthermore, temporary construction noises are exempt from the City’s noise standards.

Nonetheless, pursuant to RMC Chapter 9.24, Noise Regulation, construction would only occur during allowable hours, and all construction equipment would be fitted with muffling devices and maintained in good working order. Compliance with such restrictions would ensure that construction noise associated with the proposed project would be less than significant.

Radio communications towers are not known to emit perceivable noise or sound; thus, operation of the proposed project would not result in increased noise levels.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-44
July 2022
Conclusion
Based on the above, project construction noise would not conflict with the City’s General Plan if restricted to the hourly limits established by the City’s Noise Ordinance. In addition, the proposed project would not generate any noise level increases during operation.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a temporary exceedance of the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. b. Similar to noise, vibration involves a source, a transmission path, and a receiver. However, noise is generally considered to be pressure waves transmitted through air, whereas vibration usually consists of the excitation of a structure or surface. As with noise, vibration consists of an amplitude and frequency. A person’s perception of the vibration depends on their individual sensitivity to vibration, as well as the amplitude and frequency of the source and the response of the system which is vibrating.

Vibration is measured in terms of acceleration velocity, or displacement. A common practice is to monitor vibration in terms of peak particle velocities (PPV) in inches per second (in/sec). Standards pertaining to perception as well as damage to structures have been developed for vibration levels defined in terms of PPV. Human and structural response to different vibration levels is influenced by a number of factors, including ground type, distance between source and receptor, duration, and the number of perceived vibration events.

Table 3.2.13-2, which was developed by Caltrans, shows the vibration levels that would normally be required to result in damage to structures. As presented in the table, the threshold for architectural damage to structures is 0.20 in/sec PPV and continuous vibrations of 0.10 in/sec PPV, or greater, would likely cause annoyance to sensitive receptors.

The only vibration-generating activities associated with the proposed project would occur during construction activities. Table 3.2.13-3 shows the typical vibration levels produced by construction equipment at various distances. At a distance of 25 feet or greater, vibration levels from such equipment would be below the 0.20 in/sec threshold recommended by Caltrans.

The proposed construction activities would occur at a distance of over 400 feet from the single-family residences located to the west of the site. Therefore, per the vibration levels shown in Table 3.2.13-3, groundborne vibrations would be below the 0.20 in/sec PPV threshold established by Caltrans for architectural damage to buildings.

The proposed project would not involve any uses or operations that would generate substantial groundborne vibration.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not expose people to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, and a less-thansignificant impact would occur.

0.15 to

0.30 0.006 to

0.019
Threshold of perception;
possibility of intrusion
Vibrations unlikely to cause damage
of any type

2.0 0.08 Vibrations readily perceptible
Recommended upper level of the
vibration to which ruins and ancient
monuments should be subjected

2.5 0.10
Level at which continuous
vibrations begin to annoy
people
Virtually no risk of “architectural”
damage to normal buildings

5.0 0.20
Vibrations annoying to people
in buildings (this agrees with
the levels established for
people standing on bridges and
subjected to relative short
periods of vibrations)
Threshold at which there is a risk of
“architectural” damage to normal
dwelling - houses with plastered
walls and ceilings. Special types of
finish such as lining of walls, flexible
ceiling treatment, etc., would
minimize “architectural” damage
10 to 15 0.4 to 0.6
Vibrations considered
unpleasant by people subjected
to continuous vibrations and
unacceptable to some people
walking on bridges
Vibrations at a greater level than
normally expected from traffic, but
would cause “architectural” damage
and possibly minor structural
damage
Source: Caltrans. Transportation Related Earthborne Vibrations. TAV-02-01-R9601.

February 20, 2002.

Table 3.2.13-3 Vibration Levels for Various Construction Equipment Type of Equipment PPV at 25 feet (in/sec) PPV at 50 feet (in/sec) Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.025
Small Bulldozer 0.003 0.000
Auger/drill Rigs 0.089 0.029
Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines, May 2006.
c. The nearest airport to the project site is the Sacramento McClellan Airport, located approximately 8.5 miles southwest of the project site. Thus, the project site is not located within two miles of any public airports, and does not fall within an airport land use plan area. Therefore, no impact would occur related to the project being located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, thereby resulting in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area.

3.2.13.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to noise. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-46
July 2022

3.2.13.3 References
City of Roseville. General Plan Noise Element. Available at:
https://p1cdn4static.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Governme nt/Departments/Development%20Services/Planning/General%20Plan/Final%20Gen eral%20Plan%202020/09%20Noise_Final.pdf. Accessed October 2021.

City of Roseville. Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 9.24 Noise Regulation. Available at:
https://qcode.us/codes/roseville/. Accessed October 2021.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-47
July 2022

3.2.14 Population and Housing
XIV. Population and Housing
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or
other infrastructure)?
b. Displace a substantial number of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?

3.2.14.1 Discussion
a,b. The proposed project would include the construction of a radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank.

The project site is located in a developed area and would not include the extension of major infrastructure. Given the nature of the proposed project, the project would not create a large number of jobs or result in an influx of new residents to the project area. In addition, the proposed project would not include the construction of new housing or the demolition of existing residences. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial unplanned population growth or the displacement of existing people or housing, and no impact would occur.

3.2.14.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to population and housing. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.

3.2.14.3 References
None.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-48
July 2022

3.2.15 Public Services
XV. Public Services
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities or
a need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times, or other
performance objectives for any of the
following public services:

Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?

3.2.15.1 Discussion
a. The Roseville Fire Department operates nine fire stations that provide fire protection, suppression, emergency medical services, and hazardous material management within the City of Roseville, including the project site. The closest station is located approximately

1.2 miles southeast of the project site (Fire Station No. 4). Although a propane tank would be present on the project site, as discussed in Section 3.2.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of this document, such tanks are highly regulated and would not result in an increased demand for fire protection services. The Roseville Police Department, headquartered approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the project site at 1051 Junction Boulevard, provides police protection services throughout the City. Because the proposed project would not add any additional residents to the area, an increase in demand for fire and police services would not occur.

The project site is located within the Roseville City School District. Because the proposed project would not result in population growth in the area, implementation of the project would not generate additional demand for school facilities.

The nearest existing park to the project site is Maidu Regional Park, located approximately 3,000 feet south of the project site. Because the proposed project would not result in population growth in the area, additional demand for parks would not occur.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-49
July 2022
Based on the above, the proposed project would result in no impact relating to the provision of public services, including fire and police protection, schools, parks, and other public facilities.

3.2.15.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to the provision of public services. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.

3.2.15.3 References
City of Roseville. 2017. Location of Roseville Fire Stations. Roseville, California. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Dep artments/Fire%20Dept/Fire%20Station%20Locations/Location%20of%20Roseville% 20Fire%20Stations%20-%202017.pdf. Accessed April 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-50
July 2022

3.2.16 Recreation
XVI. Recreation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood
and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b. Include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational
facilities that might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?

3.2.16.1 Discussion
a,b. The proposed project would include the development of a radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, emergency generator, propane tank, and access roadway, on a site that is currently designated for uses which are commercial in nature.

The proposed project would not result in any population growth that could result in increased use of existing recreational facilities, nor would the proposed project include or require construction or expansion of existing recreational facilities. Thus, no impact would occur.

3.2.16.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to recreational facilities. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.

3.2.16.3 References
None.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-51
July 2022

3.2.17 Transportation
XVII. Transportation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or
policy addressing the circulation system
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?

3.2.17.1 Discussion
a-d. During construction, the proposed project would generate a minor amount of traffic on local roadways associated with construction worker commutes and the transport of materials for the project. However, such construction traffic would be limited, and would be temporary in nature. While the proposed project would include construction of a roadway extending east from the project site to the adjacent parking lot, the roadway would not be available for public use.

During the construction period, construction equipment and employee vehicles would access the project site by way of the new roadway. The new roadway and the existing parking area would be sufficient in length to accommodate the project-generated vehicles and equipment such that vehicles would not queue into the public roadway and disrupt the flow of traffic. In addition, vehicle speeds when passing through the adjacent parking lot to access the project site would be substantially slow to avoid any hazards to other vehicles and/or pedestrians.

Furthermore, the proposed project would not include development which would alter or increase demand for transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. While the proposed project would temporarily result in an increase in VMT during the construction period, operation and maintenance of the proposed project would not substantially affect local or regional VMT. Thus, impacts relating to VMT would be less than significant, and the project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities or with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b). The project would include the development of a private City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-52
July 2022
access roadway connecting the project site to the adjacent parcel. The access roadway would be required to comply with all applicable roadway construction regulations, and access would be limited to maintenance personnel. Therefore, the project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses or result in inadequate emergency access.

Based on the above, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to transportation.

3.2.17.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to transportation. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.

3.2.17.3 References
None.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-53
July 2022

3.2.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code
Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native American tribe, and
that is:
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in
its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying
the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American
tribe.

3.2.18.1 Discussion
a,b. The project site is located in an urbanized area and is surrounded by existing development. Additionally, the project would not involve substantial ground disturbing activities. However, based on tribal consultation, the project site is considered a tribal cultural resource area.

A search of the NAHC’s Sacred Lands File was conducted, and did not indicate the presence of any known cultural resources on the project site. In compliance with AB 52 (Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1), the City distributed project notification letters to the appropriate Tribes on June 3, 2022. One tribe, the United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria (UAIC), requested consultation. The UAIC is a federally recognized Tribe comprised of both Miwok and Maidu (Nisenan) Tribal members who are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area. The Tribe has a deep spiritual, cultural, and physical ties to their ancestral land and are contemporary stewards of their culture and landscapes. The Tribal community represents a continuity and endurance of their ancestors by maintaining their connection to their history and culture. It is the Tribe’s goal to ensure the preservation and continuance of their cultural heritage for current and City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-54
July 2022
future generations. The UAIC has determined that tribal cultural resources are present on the project site and consultation was concluded with agreed upon mitigation measures on July 7, 2022.

Based on the above, the potential exists that previously unknown subsurface tribal cultural resources could be encountered on the project site. Should buried or otherwise unknown tribal cultural resources be encountered and/or damaged during construction, a potentially significant impact would occur. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR- 5 would reduce the potential impact to less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

3.2.18.2 Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Tribal Monitoring
The Construction Manager shall retain one tribal monitor to monitor all vegetation clearing and removal, and all initial surface grading of the project area, down to, for footings, 40 feet below the surface. Tribal monitoring is not required during above-surface construction activities, or when excavating or re-excavating imported fill. Tribal Monitoring is required for soil which has already been previously disturbed as part of the construction project.

The tribal monitor shall have the authority to temporarily pause ground disturbance within 100 feet of the discovery for a duration long enough to examine potential tribal cultural resources that may become unearthed during the activity. If tribal cultural resources or features are not identified, then construction activities shall proceed and agency notifications are not required. In the event that additional features of the Tribal Cultural Resource are identified, the unanticipated discovery procedures in Mitigation Measure TCR-2 shall be implemented.

The tribal monitor shall maintain daily monitoring logs, which shall be submitted to the City’s Project Manager no later than the conclusion of the monitoring as proof of compliance.

Mitigation Measure TCR-2: Anticipated and Unanticipated Discover Procedures If additional subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin, or tribal cultural resources, are discovered during construction, all work shall halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery, and the Construction Manager shall immediately notify the City of Roseville Development Services Director by phone. The Construction Manager shall also immediately coordinate with the tribal monitor, or, in the absence of either, contact a qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology and subject to approval by the City, to evaluate the significance of the find and develop appropriate management recommendations. All management recommendations shall be provided to the City in writing for the City’s review City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-55
July 2022
and approval. If recommended by the qualified professional and approved by the City, this may include modification of the no-work radius.

The UAIC and Tribal Monitor shall make a determination, based on professional judgement and supported by substantial evidence, within one business day of being notified, as to whether or not the find represents a tribal cultural resource. The subsequent actions will be determined by the type of discovery, as described below. These include: 1) a work pause that, upon further investigation, is not actually a discovery and the work pause was simply needed in order to allow for closer examination of soil (a “false alarm”); 2) a work pause and subsequent action for discoveries that are clearly not related to tribal resources, such as can and bottle dumps, artifacts of European origin, and remnants of built environment features; and 3) a work pause and subsequent action for discoveries that are likely related to tribal resources, such as midden soil, bedrock mortars, groundstone, or other similar expressions.

Whenever there is question as to whether or not the discovery represents a tribal resource, culturally affiliated tribes shall be consulted in making the determination. Whenever a tribal monitor is present, the monitor shall be consulted.

The following processes shall apply, depending on the nature of the find, subject to the review and approval of the City:
• Response to False Alarms: If the Tribal Monitor determines that the find is negative for any cultural indicators, then work may resume immediately upon notice to proceed from the City’s representative. No further notifications or tribal consultation is necessary, because the discovery is not a cultural resource of any kind. The Tribal Monitor or UAIC shall provide written documentation of this finding to the Project Manager this documentation may include the monitor logs or e-mail notification. • Response to Non-Tribal Discoveries: If a tribal monitor is not present at the time of discovery and the City shall be notified immediately, to consult on a finding of eligibility and implementation of appropriate treatment measures, if the find is determined to be a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. The City of Roseville will notify any [tribe(s)] who, in writing, requested notice of unanticipated discovery of non-tribal resources. Notice shall include the photograph and description of the find, and a tribal representative shall have the opportunity to determine whether or not the find represents a tribal cultural resource.

If a response is not received within 24 hours of notification (none of which time period may fall on weekends or City holidays), the City will deem this portion of the measure completed in good faith as long as the notification was made and documented. If requested by a [tribe(s)], the City may extend this timeframe, which shall be documented in writing (electronic communication may be used to satisfy this measure). If a notified tribe responds within 24 hours to indicate that the find represents a tribal cultural resource, then the Response to Tribal Discoveries portion of this measure applies. If the tribe does not respond or concurs that the discovery is non-tribal, work shall not resume within the no-work radius until the City, through consultation as appropriate, determines that the site either: 1) is not a Historical City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-56
July 2022
Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; or 2) that the treatment measures have been completed to its satisfaction. • Response to Tribal Discoveries: If the find represents a tribal or potentially tribal cultural resource that does not include human remains, the tribe and City shall be notified. The City will consult with the tribe on a finding of eligibility and implement appropriate treatment measures, if the find is determined to be either a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, or a Tribal Cultural Resource, as defined in Section 21074 of the Public Resources Code.

Preservation in place is the preferred treatment, if feasible. Work shall not resume within the no-work radius until the City, through consultation as appropriate, determines that the site either: 1) is not a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; or 2) not a Tribal Cultural Resource, as defined in Section 21074 of the Public Resources Code; or 3) that the treatment measures have been completed to its satisfaction.
• Response to Human Remains: If the find includes human remains, or remains that are potentially human, the construction supervisor or on-site archaeologist shall ensure reasonable protection measures are taken to protect the discovery from disturbance (AB 2641) and shall notify the City and Placer County Coroner (per § 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code). The provisions of § 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, § 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, and Assembly Bill 2641 shall be implemented. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American and not the result of a crime scene, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which then will designate a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the project (§ 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). The designated MLD will have 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains. Public Resources Code § 5097.94 provides structure for mediation through the NAHC if necessary. If the landowner does not agree with the recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate (§ 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code).

If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains in a respectful manner where they will not be further disturbed (§ 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open space or conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a reinternment document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641). Work shall not resume within the no-work radius until the City, through consultation as appropriate, determines that the treatment measures have been completed to its satisfaction.

Mitigation Measure TCR-3: Restoration Location Designation Following the completion of ground disturbance soil will be retained on site, and at a mutually agreed upon time, a location shall be selected for reburial and/or placement of soil to restore all cultural items or cultural soils to the TCR. The location selected shall be under the control of the property owner, in an area not planned for future disturbance, and can accommodate the recording of a deed restriction, should the reburial location be utilized for the project. A copy of a map showing the reburial location shall be filed with the City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-57
July 2022
City for proof of compliance prior to construction and shall remain confidential. A deed restriction over the reburial location need not be filed with the County until materials have been reburied at the selected location. If the reburial location is not utilized for the project, then no further documentation or deed restrictions are required.

In the event that human remains or tribal cultural resources are encountered, the consultation and evaluation process in Mitigation Measure TCR-2 for the management of unanticipated discoveries shall be followed. Upon conclusion of that process, the Construction Manager shall rebury specified materials in the location selected for reburial, at the City’s direction and discretion. The City shall reserve the right to dictate the nature, methods, and timing of the reburial.

Within 30 days of the reburial, and consistent with Section 5097.98(e) of the Public Resources Code, the location of the reburial shall be further recorded by a qualified professional on a DPR 523 Series Primary Record and Location Map and submitted to the North Central Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information Center [5097.98(e)(1)], Native American Heritage Commission, and a reinternment record filed with the County [5097.98(e)(3)]. A copy of the confidential record and transmittal to each repository shall be provided to the City as proof of compliance within 30 days of recording.

Mitigation Measure TCR-4: Install Protective Fencing During Construction The construction contractor(s), UAIC Representative, and Tribal Monitor will install protective fencing or other acceptable methods around the culturally modified boulders, including a buffer area, before construction starts or restarts. Standard buffer areas are 100 feet, but may be increased or decreased if both the CEQA lead agency representative and affiliated Native American Tribes agree. The construction contractor(s) will maintain the protection throughout construction to avoid the resource/area of sensitivity during all remaining phases of construction. The area will be demarcated as an “Environmentally Sensitive Area”.

Mitigation Measure TCR-5: Contribution for Reburial Costs To fund costs of mitigation to the TCR, a financial contribution, will be made to the Roseville Maidu Museum for Tribal reburial costs. The contribution will be based on impacts documented during tribal monitoring, up to a maximum of $15,000.

3.2.18.3 References
Native American Heritage Commission. Strauch Drive Radio Communications Tower Project. April 19, 2022.

North Central Information Center. Records Search Results for Strauch Drive Radio Communications Tower Project; NCIC File No.: PLA-22-35. April 7, 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-58
July 2022

3.2.19 Utilities and Service Systems
XIX. Utilities and Service Systems
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage,
electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider that serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
d. Generate solid waste in excess of state or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity
of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair
the attainment of solid waste reduction
goals?
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?

3.2.19.1 Discussion
a-e. Electricity for the proposed project would be provided by a new connection to an existing transformer. Water, wastewater, storm drainage infrastructure would not be impacted by the proposed project, as the project would not require connections to such utility features.

While construction of the proposed project could generate a small amount of solid waste, the waste could be accommodated by the existing landfill facilities serving the City.

Operation of the proposed project would not require solid waste or landfill services.

Overall, the proposed project would not require the relocation or construction of new or expanded utilities.

Given that the proposed project is consistent with the site’s current General Plan land use and zoning designations, the utility infrastructure within the project vicinity has been designed with adequate capacity to accommodate the minor increase in electricity City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-59
July 2022
demand from development of the proposed radio communications tower, as well as other existing and planned uses in the project area. Therefore, the project would result in a lessthan-significant impact related to utilities and service systems.

3.2.19.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to utilities and service systems. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.

3.2.19.3 References
None.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-60
July 2022

3.2.20 Wildfire
XX. Wildfire
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard
severity zones, would the project:
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks of, and
thereby expose project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads,
fuel breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines, or other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing impacts on the
environment?
d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?

3.2.20.1 Discussion
a-d. According to the CAL FIRE Fire and Resource Assessment Program, the project site is not located within or near a State Responsibility Area or lands classified as a VHFHSZ.

The nearest VHFHSZ is approximately 10 miles east of the project site. The project site is located in a Local Responsibility Area where the Roseville Fire Department is responsible for fire protection services. Because the proposed project consists only of the installation of a radio communications tower and does not involve adding new residents or changing circulation patterns, the proposed project would not impair implementation of an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Additionally, the topography of the project site is relatively flat, and the site is located in an urbanized area of the City; thus, the project site is not susceptible to downstream flooding or landslide. Therefore, the proposed project would not be subject to substantial risks related to wildfires, and a lessthan-significant impact would occur.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-61
July 2022

3.2.20.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to wildfire. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.

3.2.20.3 References
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer.

Available at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. Accessed April 2022.

City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-62
July 2022

3.2.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.)
c. Does the project have environmental effects
that will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?

3.2.21.1 Discussion
a. As discussed in Section 3.2.4, Biological Resources, of this IS/MND, the project site is subject to regular discing and is, therefore, regularly disturbed, and construction of the proposed project would not further degrade the quality of the environment, cause fish or wildlife populations to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Due to previous disturbance of the site, the site does not contain any known historic or prehistoric resources. However, the possibility remains that tree removal could affect protected nesting bird species. Additionally, previously unknown cultural resources or tribal cultural resources could be encountered during ground disturbing activities.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1, CUL-1, CUL-2, and TCR-1 through TCR-5 would ensure that the proposed project would not displace protected species or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Therefore, potential impacts would be less-than-significant with mitigation incorporated. b. The proposed project, in conjunction with other development within the City of Roseville, could incrementally contribute to cumulative impacts in the area. However, as City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-63
July 2022
demonstrated in this IS/MND, all potential environmental impacts that could occur as a result of implementation of the proposed project would result in no impact or a less-thansignificant impact through applicable General Plan policies and RMC Standards, as well as other local and State policies. In addition, the proposed project would be allowable under the project site’s current land use and zoning designations. Therefore, development of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to cumulative impacts to cumulative impacts in the City of Roseville, and the proposed project’s incremental contribution to cumulative impacts would be less than significant. c. As described in this IS/MND, the proposed project would comply with all applicable General Plan policies, RMC Standards, and other applicable local and State regulations.

In addition, as discussed in Section 3.2.3, Air Quality, Section 3.2.7, Geology and Soils, Section 3.2.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Section 3.2.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Section 3.2.13, Noise, and Section 3.2.17, Transportation, of this IS/MND, the proposed project would not cause substantial effects to human beings, including effects related to exposure to air pollutants, hazardous materials, noise, and traffic. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact.

CEQA Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program

East Site Radio Communication Tower:

Emergency and Daily Operational
Services Project

August 2022

East Site Radio Communication Tower Project MMRP 1 August 2022 East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Introduction
Public Resources Code section 21081.6 and section 15097 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines require public agencies to adopt a monitoring or reporting program for projects approved under CEQA that require implementation of mitigation measures as part of project approval.

The following is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Roseville Regional Sports Complex Project (proposed project). The intent of the MMRP is to aid the City of Roseville with implementation and monitoring of mitigation measures adopted as part of the Roseville Regional Sports Complex Project Final Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND).

The following mitigation measures are from the East Site Radio Communication Tower:

Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project Final Subsequent IS/MND and are the responsibility of the City to implement. As stated in Section 1.3 (Documents Incorporated by Reference) of the Subsequent IS/MND, the WRSP EIR, inclusive of all CEQA analyses and documentation) are incorporated by reference, including the WRSP MMRP. This MMRP describes the additional actions that must take place to implement each mitigation measure, the timing of those actions, and the entities responsible for implementing and monitoring the actions.

MMRP Components
The components of the attached table, which contains applicable mitigation measures, are addressed briefly, below.

Impact: This column summarizes the impact identified in the Final Subsequent IS/MND.

Mitigation Measures: All applicable mitigation measures from the WRSP EIR are incorporated by reference, and mitigation measures specifically identified in the Roseville Regional Sports Complex Project Subsequent IS/MND are presented herein.

City of Roseville CEQA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program East Site Radio Communication Tower Project MMRP

2 August 2022
Action(s): For every mitigation measure, one or more actions are described. The actions delineate the means by which the mitigation measures will be implemented, and, in some instances, the criteria for determining whether a measure has been successfully implemented.

Where mitigation measures are particularly detailed, the action may refer back to the measure for specifics.

Implementing Party: This item identifies the entity that will undertake the required action.

Timing: Implementation of the action must occur prior to or during some part of project approval, project design or construction or on an ongoing basis. The timing for each measure is identified.

Monitoring Party: The City of Roseville Development Services Department, in coordination with the Public Works Department, is primarily responsible for ensuring that mitigation measures are successfully implemented. Within the City of Roseville, a number of departments and divisions could have responsibility for monitoring some aspect of the overall project. Other agencies may also be responsible for monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures. As a result, more than one monitoring party may be identified.

City of Roseville CEQA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program East Site Radio Communication Tower Project 3 August 2022 East Site Radio Communication Tower Project, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Impact Mitigation Measures Action(s) Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Biological Resources
Potential for impacts to nesting
birds
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Implement Measures to Protect Nesting Bird Species If tree removal or other ground-disturbing activities are to begin during the breeding/nesting season for raptors or other protected bird species in the region (generally February 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall be retained by the City to conduct pre-construction surveys in areas of suitable nesting habitat within two weeks prior to initiation of tree removal or ground disturbance.

The pre-construction surveys shall be submitted to the City’s Planning Division. If active nests are not found, further mitigation is not required.

If active nests are found, the construction contractor shall avoid impacts on such nests by establishing a no-disturbance buffer around the nest.

The appropriate buffer size for all nesting birds shall be determined by a qualified biologist. Buffer size will vary depending on site-specific conditions, the species of nesting bird, nature of the project activity, the extent of existing disturbance in the area, visibility of the disturbance from the nest site, and other relevant circumstances.

Construction activity shall not occur within the buffer area of an active nest and nests shall be monitored by a qualified biologist until a qualified biologist confirms that the chicks have fledged and are no longer dependent on the nest, or the nesting cycle has otherwise completed. Monitoring of the nest by a qualified biologist during construction activities.

Implement actions as required
by MM BIO-1.

Contractor. City of
Roseville Public
Works and
Development
Services
Departments
Prior to construction Contractor, City of
Roseville
Development
Services
Department
Cultural Resources
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Implement Measures to Protect Previously Unidentified Cultural Resources The City shall ensure that construction specifications include the following information in the grading notes:
 Construction shall stop if potential cultural resources are encountered. It is possible that previous activities have obscured surface evidence of cultural resources. If signs of an archeological site, such as any unusual amounts of stone, bone, or shell, are uncovered during grading or other construction activities, work shall be halted within 100 feet of the find and the City of Roseville will be notified.

A qualified archeologist shall be consulted for an onsite evaluation. If the site appears to be eligible for listing in State or federal registers, additional mitigation, such as further testing for evaluation or data recovery, may be necessary.  In the event resources are discovered, the City shall retain a qualified archaeologist to assess the find and to determine whether the resource requires further study. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction shall be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms and evaluated for significance under all applicable regulatory criteria.  All work shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find, and, if the find is determined to be an important cultural resource, the City shall make available contingency funding and a time allotment sufficient to allow recovery of an archaeological sample or to implement an avoidance measure. Construction work may continue on other parts of the project while archaeological mitigation takes place.

Stop work if potential tribal
cultural resources are
encountered during grounddisturbing activities and have a qualified archaeologist, in
consultation with culturally
affiliated tribes, evaluate the
find and develop a response
plan.

Contractor, Qualified
Archaeologist, and
City of Roseville
Development
Services
Department
Prior to and during
construction
Contractor, City of
Roseville
Development
Services
Department
City of Roseville CEQA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program East Site Radio Communication Tower Project 4 August 2022 Tribal Cultural Resources
Potential for impacts to tribal
cultural resources
Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Tribal Monitoring
The Construction Manager shall retain one tribal monitor to monitor all vegetation clearing and removal, and all initial surface grading of the project area, down to, for footings, 40 feet below the surface. Tribal monitoring is not required during above-surface construction activities, or when excavating or re-excavating imported fill. Tribal Monitoring is required for soil which has already been previously disturbed as part of the construction project.

The tribal monitor shall maintain daily monitoring logs, which shall be submitted to the City’s Project Manager no later than the conclusion of the monitoring as proof of compliance.

Implement tribal monitoring.

Contractor, Qualified
Archaeologist, and
City of Roseville
Public Works and
Development
Services
Departments
Prior to and during
construction
Contractor, City of
Roseville
Development
Services
Department
Mitigation Measure TCR-2: Anticipated and Unanticipated Discover Procedures If additional subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin, or tribal cultural resources, are discovered during construction, all work shall halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery, and the Construction Manager shall immediately notify the City of Roseville Development Services Director by phone. The Construction Manager shall also immediately coordinate with the tribal monitor, or, in the absence of either, contact a qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology and subject to approval by the City, to evaluate the significance of the find and develop appropriate management recommendations. All management recommendations shall be provided to the City in writing for the City’s review and approval. If recommended by the qualified professional and approved by the City, this may include modification of the no-work radius.

 Response to False Alarms: If the Tribal Monitor determines that the find is negative for any cultural indicators, then work may resume immediately upon notice to proceed from the City’s representative. No further notifications or tribal consultation is necessary, because the discovery is not a cultural resource of any kind. The Tribal Monitor or UAIC shall provide written documentation of this finding to the Project Manager this documentation may include the monitor logs or e-mail notification.

 Response to Non-Tribal Discoveries: If a tribal monitor is not present at the time of discovery and the City shall be notified immediately, to consult on a finding of eligibility and implementation of appropriate treatment measures, if the find is determined to be a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. The City of Roseville will notify any [tribe(s)] who, in writing, requested notice of unanticipated discovery of non-tribal resources. Notice shall include the photograph and description of the find, and a tribal representative shall have the opportunity to determine whether or not the find represents a tribal cultural resource.

 If a response is not received within 24 hours of notification (none of which time period may fall on weekends or City holidays), the City will deem this portion of the measure completed in good faith as long as the notification was made and documented. If requested by a [tribe(s)], the City may extend this timeframe, which shall be documented in writing (electronic communication may be used to satisfy this measure). If a notified tribe responds within 24 hours to indicate that the find represents a tribal cultural resource, then the Response to Tribal Discoveries portion of this measure applies. If the tribe does not respond or concurs that the discovery is non-tribal, work shall not resume within the no-work radius until the City, through consultation as appropriate, determines that the site either: 1) is not a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; or 2) that the treatment measures have been completed to its satisfaction.

City of Roseville CEQA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program East Site Radio Communication Tower Project 5 August 2022 (Mitigation Measure TCR-2: Anticipated and Unanticipated Discover Procedures Continued)  Response to Tribal Discoveries: If the find represents a tribal or potentially tribal cultural resource that does not include human remains, the tribe and City shall be notified. The City will consult with the tribe on a finding of eligibility and implement appropriate treatment measures, if the find is determined to be either a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, or a Tribal Cultural Resource, as defined in Section 21074 of the Public Resources Code. Preservation in place is the preferred treatment, if feasible. Work shall not resume within the no-work radius until the City, through consultation as appropriate, determines that the site either: 1) is not a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; or 2) not a Tribal Cultural Resource, as defined in Section 21074 of the Public Resources Code; or 3) that the treatment measures have been completed to its satisfaction.  Response to Human Remains: If the find includes human remains, or remains that are potentially human, the construction supervisor or on-site archaeologist shall ensure reasonable protection measures are taken to protect the discovery from disturbance (AB 2641) and shall notify the City and Placer County Coroner (per § 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code). The provisions of § 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, § 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, and Assembly Bill 2641 shall be implemented. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American and not the result of a crime scene, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which then will designate a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the project (§ 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). The designated MLD will have 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains. Public Resources Code § 5097.94 provides structure for mediation through the NAHC if necessary. If the landowner does not agree with the recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate (§ 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code).

Mitigation Measure TCR-3: Restoration Location Designation Following the completion of ground disturbance soil will be retained on site, and at a mutually agreed upon time, a location shall be selected for reburial and/or placement of soil to restore all cultural items or cultural soils to the TCR. The location selected shall be under the control of the property owner, in an area not planned for future disturbance, and can accommodate the recording of a deed restriction, should the reburial location be utilized for the project. A copy of a map showing the reburial location shall be filed with the City for proof of compliance prior to construction and shall remain confidential. A deed restriction over the reburial location need not be filed with the County until materials have been reburied at the selected location. If the reburial location is not utilized for the project, then no further documentation or deed restrictions are required.

Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
23 August 2022
Terri Shirhall
City of Roseville Development Services Department
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
[email protected]

COMMENTS TO REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, EAST SITE RADIO COMMUNICATION TOWER: EMERGENCY AND DAILY OPERATIONAL SERVICES PROJECT, SCH#2022070353, PLACER COUNTY Pursuant to the State Clearinghouse’s 20 July 2022 request, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Central Valley Water Board) has reviewed the Request for Review for the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project, located in Placer County.

Our agency is delegated with the responsibility of protecting the quality of surface and groundwaters of the state; therefore, our comments will address concerns surrounding those issues.

I. Regulatory Setting
Basin Plan
The Central Valley Water Board is required to formulate and adopt Basin Plans for all areas within the Central Valley region under Section 13240 of the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Each Basin Plan must contain water quality objectives to ensure the reasonable protection of beneficial uses, as well as a program of implementation for achieving water quality objectives with the Basin Plans. Federal regulations require each state to adopt water quality standards to protect the public health or welfare, enhance the quality of water and serve the purposes of the Clean Water Act. In California, the beneficial uses, water quality objectives, and the Antidegradation Policy are the State’s water quality standards. Water quality standards are also contained in the National Toxics Rule, 40 CFR Section 131.36, and the California Toxics Rule, 40 CFR Section 131.38.

The Basin Plan is subject to modification as necessary, considering applicable laws, policies, technologies, water quality conditions and priorities. The original Basin Plans were adopted in 1975, and have been updated and revised periodically as required, using Basin Plan amendments. Once the Central Valley Water Board has adopted a Basin Plan amendment in noticed public hearings, it must be approved by East Site Radio Communication Tower: - 2 - 23 August 2022 Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project
Placer County
the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board), Office of Administrative Law (OAL) and in some cases, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Basin Plan amendments only become effective after they have been approved by the OAL and in some cases, the USEPA. Every three (3) years, a review of the Basin Plan is completed that assesses the appropriateness of existing standards and evaluates and prioritizes Basin Planning issues. For more information on the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins, please visit our website:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/basin_plans/ Antidegradation Considerations
All wastewater discharges must comply with the Antidegradation Policy (State Water Board Resolution 68-16) and the Antidegradation Implementation Policy contained in the Basin Plan. The Antidegradation Implementation Policy is available on page 74 at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/basin_plans/sacsjr_2018

05.pdf
In part it states:

Any discharge of waste to high quality waters must apply best practicable treatment or control not only to prevent a condition of pollution or nuisance from occurring, but also to maintain the highest water quality possible consistent with the maximum benefit to the people of the State.

This information must be presented as an analysis of the impacts and potential impacts of the discharge on water quality, as measured by background concentrations and applicable water quality objectives.

The antidegradation analysis is a mandatory element in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and land discharge Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) permitting processes. The environmental review document should evaluate potential impacts to both surface and groundwater quality.

II. Permitting Requirements
Construction Storm Water General Permit
Dischargers whose project disturb one or more acres of soil or where projects disturb less than one acre but are part of a larger common plan of development that in total disturbs one or more acres, are required to obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Construction General Permit), Construction General Permit Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ. Construction activity subject to this permit includes clearing, grading, grubbing, disturbances to the ground, such as stockpiling, or excavation, but does not include regular maintenance activities performed to restore the original line, grade, or capacity of the facility. The Construction General Permit requires the development and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). For more information on the Construction General Permit, visit the State Water Resources Control Board website at:

East Site Radio Communication Tower: - 3 - 23 August 2022 Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project
Placer County
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/constpermits.sht ml
Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit
If the project will involve the discharge of dredged or fill material in navigable waters or wetlands, a permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act may be needed from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). If a Section 404 permit is required by the USACE, the Central Valley Water Board will review the permit application to ensure that discharge will not violate water quality standards. If the project requires surface water drainage realignment, the applicant is advised to contact the Department of Fish and Game for information on Streambed Alteration Permit requirements. If you have any questions regarding the Clean Water Act Section 404 permits, please contact the Regulatory Division of the Sacramento District of USACE at (916) 557-5250.

Clean Water Act Section 401 Permit – Water Quality Certification If an USACE permit (e.g., Non-Reporting Nationwide Permit, Nationwide Permit, Letter of Permission, Individual Permit, Regional General Permit, Programmatic General Permit), or any other federal permit (e.g., Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act or Section 9 from the United States Coast Guard), is required for this project due to the disturbance of waters of the United States (such as streams and wetlands), then a Water Quality Certification must be obtained from the Central Valley Water Board prior to initiation of project activities. There are no waivers for 401 Water Quality Certifications. For more information on the Water Quality Certification, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/water_quality_certificatio n/
Waste Discharge Requirements – Discharges to Waters of the State If USACE determines that only non-jurisdictional waters of the State (i.e., “nonfederal” waters of the State) are present in the proposed project area, the proposed project may require a Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) permit to be issued by Central Valley Water Board. Under the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, discharges to all waters of the State, including all wetlands and other waters of the State including, but not limited to, isolated wetlands, are subject to State regulation. For more information on the Waste Discharges to Surface Water NPDES Program and WDR processes, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at:https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/waste_to_surface_wat er/
Projects involving excavation or fill activities impacting less than 0.2 acre or 400 linear feet of non-jurisdictional waters of the state and projects involving dredging activities impacting less than 50 cubic yards of non-jurisdictional waters of the state may be eligible for coverage under the State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Order No. 2004-0004-DWQ (General Order 2004-0004). For more information on the General Order 2004-0004, visit the State Water Resources Control Board website at:

East Site Radio Communication Tower: - 4 - 23 August 2022 Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project
Placer County
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopted_orders/water_quality/200 4/wqo/wqo2004-0004.pdf
Dewatering Permit
If the proposed project includes construction or groundwater dewatering to be discharged to land, the proponent may apply for coverage under State Water Board General Water Quality Order (Low Threat General Order) 2003-0003 or the Central Valley Water Board’s Waiver of Report of Waste Discharge and Waste Discharge Requirements (Low Threat Waiver) R5-2018-0085. Small temporary construction dewatering projects are projects that discharge groundwater to land from excavation activities or dewatering of underground utility vaults. Dischargers seeking coverage under the General Order or Waiver must file a Notice of Intent with the Central Valley Water Board prior to beginning discharge.

For more information regarding the Low Threat General Order and the application process, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopted_orders/water_quality/2003/ wqo/wqo2003-0003.pdf
For more information regarding the Low Threat Waiver and the application process, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/board_decisions/adopted_orders/waiv ers/r5-2018-0085.pdf
Limited Threat General NPDES Permit
If the proposed project includes construction dewatering and it is necessary to discharge the groundwater to waters of the United States, the proposed project will require coverage under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Dewatering discharges are typically considered a low or limited threat to water quality and may be covered under the General Order for Limited Threat Discharges to Surface Water (Limited Threat General Order). A complete Notice of Intent must be submitted to the Central Valley Water Board to obtain coverage under the Limited Threat General Order. For more information regarding the Limited Threat General Order and the application process, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/board_decisions/adopted_orders/gene ral_orders/r5-2016-0076-01.pdf
NPDES Permit
If the proposed project discharges waste that could affect the quality of surface waters of the State, other than into a community sewer system, the proposed project will require coverage under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. A complete Report of Waste Discharge must be submitted with the Central Valley Water Board to obtain a NPDES Permit. For more information regarding the NPDES Permit and the application process, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/help/permit/ East Site Radio Communication Tower: - 5 - 23 August 2022 Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project
Placer County
If you have questions regarding these comments, please contact me at (916) 464-4684 or [email protected].

Peter Minkel
Engineering Geologist
cc: State Clearinghouse unit, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Sacramento
1 Shirhall, Terri
From: Lance Hibben <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 11:04 PM
To: Shirhall, Terri
Cc: McColl, Gina
Subject: East Side Communications Tower
EXTERNAL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click on any links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Terri,
At tonight’s monthly Maidu Neighborhood Association meeting (August 23rd), the East Side Communications Tower was presented to residents attending the meeting by Gina McColl, Carl Grover, and Hong Sae, According to the city’s posted information on its website, public comment on this project was extended thru August 23rd.

The information about the proposed tower received mixed reactions and comments by attendees, some who are planning to contact city representatives about their concerns.

My concerns have to do with the simulated photos of the tower; why aesthetics were not checked in the environmental factors potentially affected (Section 3.1); Section 3.2.1 Aesthetics, indicates “No Impact”; and the accuracy of information presented on page 3-7. If aesthetics are not an issue (according to the report), why were photo simulations developed for public review. It seems contradictory and potentially understated.

A proposed height of 180 feet, the tower would be approximately the same height as a sixteen story building. The simulation photos seem to show the tower significantly shorter. If this is the case, it could have a misleading effect to the public.

I look forward to your response to my concerns.

Thank you,
Lance Hibben

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2296
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title:

Sierra Vista Specific Plan KT Phase 2 Public Improvements - Reimbursement Agreement
Contact: Matthew Todd 916-774-5562 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.14.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the Reimbursement Agreement with Sierra Vista Communities, LLC and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
On May 19, 2010, City Council approved the Development Agreement (DA) for the Sierra Vista Specific Plan. The DA allows the developers of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan the opportunity to receive reimbursement for City roadway improvements along Baseline Road, Santucci Boulevard, Vista Grande Boulevard, and Westbrook Boulevard, including signalized intersection improvements, which are beyond the developer's obligations. Sierra Vista Communities, LLC will be constructing Baseline Road from Westbrook Boulevard to the western City limits, Santucci Boulevard between Baseline Road and Vista Grande Boulevard, Vista Grande Boulevard from Westbrook Boulevard to the western City limits, and will be constructing various traffic signal improvements located along these segments of roads. The City’s cost obligation for these improvements is $9,587,155.83. Funding for the City improvements is supplied through the City/County Traffic Mitigation Fund, the City Traffic Mitigation Fund, and the Sierra Vista Set-aside in the City’s Traffic Mitigation Fund. The City/County Traffic Mitigation Fund, the City Traffic Mitigation Fund, and the Sierra Vista Set-aside are funded by developer fees and are intended to specifically fund the capital improvements associated with Baseline Road and the Sierra Vista Specific Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this item will have no impact to the City's General Fund. This reimbursement agreement, in the amount of $9,587,155.83, is funded through the City/County Traffic Mitigation Fund, the City’s Traffic Mitigation Fund, and the Sierra Vista Set-aside in the City’s Traffic Mitigation Fund by developer-paid fees collected over time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Matthew Todd, Principal Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-350
Reimbursement Agreement
Vicinity Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-350

APPROVING A CITY/DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SIERRA VISTA COMMUNITIES, LLC, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a City/Developer Reimbursement Agreement regarding the Sierra Vista KT Phase 2 Public Improvements Project, by and between the City of Roseville and Sierra Vista Communities, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

WESTBROOK
BLVD BASELINE ROAD City of Rocklin PLACER COUNTY SACRAMENTO COUNTY

FOOTHILLS BLVD BLVD
INDUSTRIAL BLVD BLUE OAKS SITE 8065 VICINITY MAP City of Roseville Placer County

FIDDYMENT ROAD

WOODCREEK OAKS BLVD
U.P.R.R.

U.P.R.R.

U.P.R.R. Roseville City Sierra Vista Specific Plan
Boundary West Roseville Specific Plan Area

WATT AVENUE PFE ROAD

COOK-RIOLO ROAD
Limits, typ.
(future)

SANTUCCI BLVD

PLEASANT GROVE

BLVDDOUGLAS BLVD CIRBY WAY RIVERSIDE
AVENUE

STANFORD
RANCH
ROAD
U.P.R.R. EUREKA ROAD

GALLERIA
BLVD
SUNSET
BLVD

ROSEVILLE
PKWY N.T.S. SUBDIVISION NO. PL20-0098 PARCEL DF-20

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2292
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Sierra Vista Community Facilities District - Phase 7A - Notice of Completion Contact: Jeremy Knuthson 916-223-3859 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.15.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista Community Facilities District (CFD) Phase 7A, CWJ # 190396, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City Specifications.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Jeremy Knuthson, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-346
Notice of Completion
Exhibit A - Vicinity Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-346

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Sierra Vista CFD – Phase 7A PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO

EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista CFD – Phase 7A is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of Sierra Vista Federico recorded in Book EE of Maps, Page 6, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Sierra Vista CFD – Phase 7A.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2022, by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

VISTA GRANDE BL
U
P
L
A
N
D
D
R
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
T

EXHIBIT A
City of Roseville
Sierra Vista CFD
Phase 7A
Project
Location
0 .

0.15 0.3
Miles

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2293
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Sierra Vista Community Facilities District - Phase 9A - Notice of Completion Contact: Jeremy Knuthson 916-223-3859 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.16.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista Community Facilities District (CFD) - Phase 9A, CWJ # 190492, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

Description
Resolution 22-347
Notice of Completion
Exhibit A - Vicinity Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-347

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Sierra Vista CFD – Phase 9A PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO

EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista CFD – Phase 9A is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

EARL RUSH DR

WESTBROO
K
B
L

PLEASANT GROVE BL

VISTA GRANDE BL

MARKET ST

EXHIBIT A
City of Roseville
Sierra Vista CFD
Phase 9A
Project
Location
0 .

0.15 0.3
Miles

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2291
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Sierra Vista Community Facilities District - Phase 10A - Notice of Completion Contact: Jeremy Knuthson 916-223-3859 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.17.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista Community Facilities District (CFD) - Phase 10A, CWJ # 190565, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

Description
Resolution 22-345
Notice of Completion
Exhibit A - Vicinity Map
Final Map 1 of 2
Final Map 2 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 22-345

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Sierra Vista CFD – Phase 10A PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO

EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista CFD – Phase 10A is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of The Villages at Sierra Vista recorded in Book DD of Maps, Page 26, and Sierra Vista Federico recorded in Book EE of Maps, Page 6, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Sierra Vista CFD – Phase 10A.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

EARL RUSH DR
S
A
N
T
U
C
CI B
L
W
E
S
T
B
R
O
O
K
B
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
T

EXHIBIT A
City of Roseville
Sierra Vista CFD
Phase 10A
Project
Location
0 .

0.25 0.5
Miles

OWNER'S STATEMENT:

THE UI\IDERSIGNEO HEREBY STATS THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY PERSONS HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTERESTS IN THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN THIS PLAT OF " LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION MAP OF THE VILLAGES AT SIERRA VISTA" SHOWN UPON THIS MAP AND

THEY HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION ANO RECORDING OF THIS MAP AND OFFER FOR DEDICATION AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES THE FOLLOWING:
*THli: REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
(A) PUBLIC. EASEMENTS FOR lfllSTALl,.ATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, GAS AND SEWli:R PIP es. ANO FOft;,POLES AND OVERHEAQ AND UNDERGROUND

WIRES AND CONDUITS FOR ELECTRIC, TELEVISION AND TELEPHQJ',JE SERVICES AND TRAFFIC

CONTROL APPURTENANCES TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVl=R, UNDER AND ACROSS THOSE STRIPS OF LAND L YlfllG CONTIGUOUS TO THE DRIVf;i, STREET, ROAD, WAY AND BOULEVARD SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "P.U.E." (PJJBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT).
(B) PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR INST ALU\ TION AND MAINTEN�NCE OF BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, GAS ANO SEWli:R PIPES, AND FOR POLES AND OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND WIRES AND CONDUITS FOR ELECTRIC, TELEVISION AND TELEPHONE SERVICE$, TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES.PERTAINING THERETO ON, ()VER, UNDER AND ACROSS THOSE STfUPS OF LAND LYING WITHIN LOTS SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "P.U.E." (PUBLIC UTILITY fi:ASEM!zNT).
(C) PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ON, OVER AND ACROSS THOSE STRIPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON /I.ND DESIGNATED 'P.E.' (PEOESTRIAN EASEMENT). (D) PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLES ACCESS AND THE INSTALLATION ANO MAINTENANCE OF A BIKE PATH, TOGETHER WITH ANY AND All APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO .ON, OVER ANO ACROS� THOSE STRIPS OF LANO SHOWN HEREON ANO DE$1GNATIED 'B.P.E.' (BIKE PATH EASEMENT)
(E) PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR THE INGRESS AND EGRESS OF EMERGENCY VEHICLES AND UTILITY l'v1,A.INTENANCE VEHICLES, TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER AND ACROSS THOSE STRlPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON ANO DESIGNATED 'M.A.E.' (MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT)
(F)'f>UBLIC EASEMENT FOR TJ,tE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A BUS SHELTER TOGETHEzR WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER ANO ACROSS T!iAT STRIP OF LAND SHOWN HEREON ANO DESIGNATE.0 "BUS SHELTER EASEMENT".

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED IN FEE FOR PUBUC PURPOSE$:
(A) AS P\JBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (INCL\JDING ALL IMPROVEMENTS THEREON) THE STREETS

SHOWN HEREON AS FIDDYMENT ROAO, VISTAGRANDE BOULEVARD, UPLAND ORNE, SIERRA GLEN DRIVE AND MARKET STREET.

THE REAL PROPERTY Df;SCRIBED BELOW IS IRREVOCABLY DEDICATED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC PU�POSES:
(A) LOTS 3, 5, 6, 7, 24 AND 25 SHOWN HEREON TO THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE FOR OPEN SPACE PURPOSE$.
(B) LOTS 9, 17 AND 23 SHOWN HEREON TO THE ClTY OF ROSEVll..LE FOR PARK PURPOSES. (0� LOT 8 SHOWN HEREON FOR A V\!E;LL SITE.
(D) LOT W SHOWN HEREON !=OR A SCHOOL SITE
(E) AS P\JBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY(INCl..UDING ALL IMPROVEMENTS THEREON) THE STREET SHOWN HEREON AS BRAMBLEWOOD WAY AND SAN FERNANDO DRIVE.

MOU RI ER INVESTMENTS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED UABILITY COMPANY JOHN L MOURIER 11

MANAGING MEMBER
A Final Map of

THE VILLAGES AT SIERRA VISTA
A Large Lot Subdivi$ion
Subdivision No.: SUBD 000157
ALL OF PARCELS 'D' AN,D 'E' ANO A POR1ION OF PARCEL 'F' AS SHOWN O.N "PARCEL MAP NO. P-73362" FU..ED IN BOOK 15 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGE 143.

LOCATED IN SECTION 36, l. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, OOUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY, 2015
BAKER-WILLIAMS ENGINiEERING GROUP
Sheet 1 of 10
NOTARY STATEMENT: ... • ...
. . c..e it:ti f: \c..A: ,E..

A NOTARY PUBt.lC OROTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THI$ &FA7FEMENf\tERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY QF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH Tl-US CERTIFICATE 1$ ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF TtfAT DOCUMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
SS

COUNTY OF PLACER )

ON JUNE ) Q
""
� ,20158EFOREME ;<Af"e"'- .µ.e4Jl�� , NOTARY PUBLIC
PERSONALLY APPEARED JOHN L MOURIER Ill WHO PROVED TO� ON BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERS<;:>NS WHOSE l'\IAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE

WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHOR!lED CAPACITIES, ANO THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS OR THE ENTITY UPQN BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS ACTJ;D, EXECUTE.[) THE INSTRUMENT.
. .

I CERTIFY UNDER PENAL TY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFCALIFORNIA TliAT THE FORJ:;GOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

PRINT NAME
MY COMMISSION NO. lS � () <'i b/ � "J
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE .QF BUSINESS 1$ 'RI ltre I"'" COUNTY.

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES O CT 1, o,'Jf).I g'
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

THIS MAP WA$ PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIE;LD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE Wl'TH THE REQUl�EMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF MOl:JRIER LAND INVESTM(;:NT CORP., IN AUGUS12014. I HEREl3Y

STATE THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN THOSE POSITIONS ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 31, 2016, THAT THE MONUMENTS WILL BE SUFFIClENT TO ENASLE THE SURVl:Y TO BE RETRACED

AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIQNALLYAPPRQVED TENTATIVE MAP.

DATE (q(0Bt0S ,-'.
�� JOl-iNRLJ� �S. 7820
EXPIRES 12/3112<}15
BOOK Dt> OF MAPS� PAGE
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:

I HEREBY STA TE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS PLAT OF "LAR.GE LOT SUBDIVISION MAP Of THE VILLAGES AT SIERRA VISTA" ANO FIND IT TO 8E SUBSTAN.TIALLY THE SAME AS 1HE TEENTATtVE MAP ON Fll..E ANO ANY APPROVED AL''fERATIONS THEREOF, THAT ALL PROVISIONS OP THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ALL APPLICABlE CITY ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WIT!-(
DATED. 7.{;z.c, .... /1,£ -,
MARC STOUT R.C.E. �879
ACTING CITY ENGINE!:ER, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
EXPIRATION DATE 09/30/2016
I HEREBY St ATE THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THlS PLAT OF "LARGE LOT SU$DIVISION MAP' OP THE VILLAGES AT SIERRAVISTA" IS TECHNICAl..LY CORRECT For Marc Stout, Acting City Engineer, City of Roseville DATED 7 �, /l /l's
TIMOTHY G. Bl.Al
P.L.S. 8278 EXPl
PUBLIC AGENCY ST:ATEMENt:

PURSUANT TO SECTION 66477.{? OF THE SUBOIVISldN MAP ACT, SHOULD. TH.E CITY OF ROSEVILL.E DETERMINE THAT THE PUBLIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH LOT 8 IS DEDICATED NO LONGER l;XISTS, THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE SHALL RECONVEY THI; PROPERTY JO THE GRANTOR. WHOSE CURRENTADDRESS IS LISTED aELOV\l OR TO THEIR SUCCE;SSOR($) IN INTEREST:

MdURIER INVESl'MENTS, LLC
14$0 BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD; SUITE£ 190
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT:

I HERSBY STATE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE HAS APPROVED THIS PLAT OF "LARGE !,.OT SUBDIVISION MAP OFTrlE VILLAGES AT SIERRA VISTA" AND HAS ACCEPllED ON BEHALF OF THE PUB!,.,IC, SUBJECT TO IMPROVEMENT, THE EASl;MENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY HEREON OFFl=RED FOR DEDICATION. THE CITY COUNCIL REJl;CTS AT THIS TIME, BUT RESE.RVES THE RIGHT TO ACCEPiAT A !,.ATER DATE, ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC, ALL IRREVOCABLE OFFERS OF DEDICATION FN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERM$ OF THOSE OFFERS.

DATED '/ 21 (ts,
RECORDER'S STATEMENT:

BY: ________ �------ ASSISTANT Cli'Y CLE!RK
ACCEPTED FOR RECORD AND Flll;:D IN THE OFFICE OF THE RJ;;CORDER OF PLACER COUNTY, � STATE OF CAl,IFORNIA, AT THE REQUEST OF OLl) REPUBLIC TilLE COMPANY, AT MINUTES AFTER ..,.11_ O'CLOCKll.M. ON THE J.'f#t DAY OF · .... 'Ji.. Iv . , 2015 AND RECORDED IN BOOK QD OF MAPS, AT PAGE cl�
· '
oocuMENT No. J.01�-001osf ;ia
FEE $35.00 BY:

DEPUTY

4.111.�
SHEET 1 OF 10
()
z
OJ
0 302-805

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2290
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Sierra Vista - Village JM-21 - Notice of Completion Contact: Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.18.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista - Village JM-21, CWJ#190527 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Andrew Druck, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-344
NOC
Exhibit A - Vicinity Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-344

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA – VILLAGE JM-21, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO

EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista – Village JM-21 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book FF of Maps, Page 56 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2022, by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

MORNINGSTAR DR

FIDDYMENT RD

UPLAND DR

WESTHILLS DR

VISTA GRANDE BL
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Sierra Vista
Village JM-21
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles

BLUE OAKSFIDDYMENT
W
EST
BROO
K

SANTUCCI

BASELINE

VISTA GRANDE

PLEASANT GROVE

JUNCTION
Vicinity Map

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2283
File #: 0400-04-09-1
Title: West Roseville Specific Plan - Parcel F-55 - Notice of Completion Contact: Danny Jacobo 916-223-7486 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.19.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Parcel F55, CWJ#190376 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Danny Jacobo, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-339
Exhibit A Location Map
NOC
Record Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-339

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Parcel F-55 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION",

AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID

NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THESUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Parcel F-55 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book FF of Maps, Page 99 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

BLUE OAKS BL

HAYDEN PW
N
H
AY
D
E
N
P
W

WESTPARK DR
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Parcel F-55
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
S
A
N
TUCCI

BLUE OAKS

WESTBROOK

FIDDYMENT PLEASANT GROVE
Vicinity Map

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2301
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Sierra Vista - Upland Drive - Segment 4 - Notice of Completion Contact: Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.20.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Upland Drive - Segment 4, CWJ #190502, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

Description
Resolution 22-355
NOC
Exhibit A - Vicinity Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-355

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS UPLAND DRIVE –SEGMENT 4 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO

EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Upland Drive – Segment 4 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of The Villages At Sierra Vista recorded in Book DD of Maps, Page 26, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Upland Drive – Segment4

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

FIDDYMENT RD
UPLAN
D
D
R

VISTA GRANDE BL

MARKET ST

WESTHILLS DR
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Upland Drive
Segment 4
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles

BLUE OAKSFIDDYMENT
W
E
S
T
BROO
K

SANTUCCI

BASELINE

VISTA GRANDE

PLEASANT GROVE

JUNCTION
Vicinity Map
OWNER'S STATEMENT:

WIRES AND CONDUITS FOR ELECTRIC, TELEVISION AND TELEPHQJ',JE SERVICES AND TRAFFIC

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED IN FEE FOR PUBUC PURPOSE$:
(A) AS P\JBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (INCL\JDING ALL IMPROVEMENTS THEREON) THE STREETS

SHOWN HEREON AS FIDDYMENT ROAO, VISTAGRANDE BOULEVARD, UPLAND ORNE, SIERRA GLEN DRIVE AND MARKET STREET.

MOU RI ER INVESTMENTS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED UABILITY COMPANY JOHN L MOURIER 11

MANAGING MEMBER
A Final Map of

LOCATED IN SECTION 36, l. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, OOUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY, 2015
BAKER-WILLIAMS ENGINiEERING GROUP
Sheet 1 of 10
NOTARY STATEMENT: ... • ...
. . c..e it:ti f: \c..A: ,E..

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
SS

COUNTY OF PLACER )

I CERTIFY UNDER PENAL TY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFCALIFORNIA TliAT THE FORJ:;GOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

PRINT NAME
MY COMMISSION NO. lS � () <'i b/ � "J
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE .QF BUSINESS 1$ 'RI ltre I"'" COUNTY.

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES O CT 1, o,'Jf).I g'
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIQNALLYAPPRQVED TENTATIVE MAP.

DATE (q(0Bt0S ,-'.
�� JOl-iNRLJ� �S. 7820
EXPIRES 12/3112<}15
BOOK Dt> OF MAPS� PAGE
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:

MdURIER INVESl'MENTS, LLC
14$0 BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD; SUITE£ 190
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT:

DATED '/ 21 (ts,
RECORDER'S STATEMENT:

DEPUTY

4.111.�
SHEET 1 OF 10
()
z
OJ
0 302-805

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2277
File #: 0704-01 & 0214
Title: Maidu Regional Park Soccer Fields Fencing - Grant Agreement Contact: Jeff Nereson 916-774-5974 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.21.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a Grant Agreement between City of Roseville and Placer Valley Tourism for a project that will add fencing around the Maidu soccer fields at Maidu Regional Park, and authorize the City Manager to execute it.

BACKGROUND
In March 2022 the Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) Department submitted a grant application to Placer Valley Tourism (PVT) for a fence project at the Maidu soccer fields and at the Crabb Park and Central Park softball/baseball fields. PVT made the decision to award PRL $250,000 towards fencing at the Maidu soccer fields, and suggested the City provide matching funds in an effort to complete all three projects. These grant dollars will help fund the fence project at Maidu, adding a 6’ high, black coated fence around the perimeter of all five soccer fields. In 2021, the City, Roseville Youth Soccer Club, and Granite Bay FC partnered on a significant financial investment to upgrade the Maidu soccer fields to bermuda turf. The prevention of overuse and misuse of these fields helps protect this investment. The fence project will allow us to preserve the safety and playability of the fields for user groups by better controlling field use, including during the fields' dormant season. It will provide an opportunity to maintain Maidu as a desirable, first class destination for larger events and tournaments. Having five high-quality fields at Maidu, along with the recently approved fields at the Sports Complex, provides a nice complement of natural grass and artificial turf fields that will be highly attractive both locally and regionally.

FISCAL IMPACT
Project costs that exceed $250,000 will be funded through the City’s General Fund Capital Reserve Fund (1012). Additionally from this fund, the City will complete fencing of the Central Park and Crabb Park outfields, up to a match of PVT’s $250,000 (for a total of $500,000). PRL will recommend a budget adjustment to fund the projects at the time the construction contract award is recommended.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the construction of minor structures (fencing) accessory to existing City facilities. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 11 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15311). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Jeff Nereson, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Manager
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-335
PVTGrant Agreement - Maidu Fence
RESOLUTION NO. 22-335

APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

AND SOUTH PLACER COUNTY TOURISM CORPORATION DBA PLACER VALLEY

TOURISM, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT AND ALL

RELATED FORMS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Grant Agreement, for fencing around the Maidu soccer fields at Maidu Regional Park, by and between the City of Roseville and South Placer County Tourism Corporation dba Placer Valley Tourism, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said grant agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it and all related forms on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2280
File #: 0704-01
Title: Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation Project - Notice of Completion Contact: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.22.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation Project as complete and adopt a resolution authorizing the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director to execute the attached Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department has made a final inspection of the Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation Project and has found that all contract work has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The project is now ready for acceptance.

The project scope of work included removal and replacement of the existing tennis court surfacing and subgrade, installation of a vertical moisture barrier and concrete curbing around the perimeter of the courts, new chain link fencing, and modifications to the surrounding landscape and irrigation. In accordance with our specifications, the Contractor shall guarantee the installation of these improvements for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of this Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the project was provided through FY2020-21 General Fund year-end surplus funds by a budget adjustment approved by Council at the May 18, 2022 meeting. Maintenance of the existing citywide park is provided by the General Fund and will remain unchanged.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Joel De Jong, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Project Manager Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-336
Notice of Completion
Mahany Vicinity map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-336

ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS THE MAHANY TENNIS COURTS RENOVATION PROJECT, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND

AUTHORIZING THE PARKS, RECREATION AND LIBRARIES DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE

SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The “Notice of Completion” on file in the City Clerk’s Department relative to that public work known as the Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation Project, has been approved and the public work accepted.

2. The Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

MCANALLY DR

CALLAWASSIE
WY

DURSEY CT

CARAGH ST

WOODCREEK OAKS
BL
Mahany Tennis Courts

PROJECT SITE
The project scope of work includes removal and replacement of the existing tennis court surfacing and subgrade, installation of a vertical moisture barrier and concrete curbing around the perimeter of the courts, fencing updates, and modifications to the surrounding landscape and irrigation.

Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation Project
3051 Woodcreek Oaks Blvd, Roseville, CA 95747
Exhibit A

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2285
File #: 0800-02 & 0900-02-02-2
Title:

Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Energy Recovery Projects - Professional Services Agreement Amendment
Contact: Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.23.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Brown and Caldwell for additional time needed to complete construction, including inspection, startup and testing, and risk management services during construction of the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Energy Recovery Projects.

BACKGROUND
Project Background
The Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP) Expansion Project and Energy Recovery Project (ERP) are both currently under construction. The Expansion Project will increase the plant’s treatment capability by adding primary clarification and anaerobic digestion of primary solids and waste-activated sludge. The two new anaerobic digesters will produce digester gas that will be supplied to the ERP for generation of renewable compressed natural gas (rCNG) to be used by the City’s Solid Waste collection vehicles as fuel, and production of electrical power to offset a portion of the PGWWTP’s power demands.

The City awarded the Design-Assist and Construction contracts for both projects on November 6, 2019. Construction of the ERP was expected to be completed in February 2022 and the Expansion Project was expected to be completed in June 2022; however, based on the Contractor’s progress, it is currently estimated that the ERP substantial completion will be in April 2023 with the Expansion Project’s substantial completion in June 2023. Brown and Caldwell’s services are estimated to be needed through October 2023 for final close out items.

Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Background
On September 6, 2017, Brown and Caldwell was awarded a PSA in the amount of $6,389,350 to provide construction management and inspection services for both the PGWWTP Expansion Project and the ERP.

The First Amendment to the PSA to Brown and Caldwell includes an extension of their team’s services during the projected 12 month construction schedule extension. The First Amendment includes field inspection, construction management, startup and commission support, closeout support, construction risk support, and project management services.

FISCAL IMPACT
The additional cost for the work included in the First Amendment is $2,615,627. The First Amendment increases the previous contract amount of $6,389,350 to a revised total contract cost of $9,004,977. Funding for this work will be covered under the capital improvement projects for the South Placer Wastewater Authority (SPWA) and will be jointly funded between Roseville and the other SPWA Regional Partners (i.e. Placer County and the South Placer Municipal Utility District).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Implementation of the PGWWTP Expansion Project and Energy Recovery Project were previously evaluated in the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Energy Recovery Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) (SCH# 2016122040) (certified by the City Council on April 6, 2017), and the Addendum to the IS/MND (SCH# 2016122040) (certified by the City Council on November 7, 2018). The improvement plans included in the design-assist and construction agreement are consistent with the project evaluated in the certified Final IS/MND and the Addendum, and consequently no additional CEQA action is required for is required for the First Amendment approval.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Tracie Mueller, Senior Engineer
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-341
First Amendment to PSA
RESOLUTION NO. 22-341

APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND BROWN AND CALDWELL, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a first amendment to professional services agreement for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Energy Recovery Projects, by and between the City of Roseville and Brown and Caldwell, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said first amendment is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D005\P004\00069257.DOCX; 08/08/2022]

FIRST AMENDMENT TO

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Energy Recovery Project THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of __________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Brown and Caldwell, a California corporation (“CONSULTANT”); and W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT previously entered into a Professional Services Agreement dated September 6, 2017 (“Agreement”) regarding construction management services for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Energy Recovery Project (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, CITY desires to amend the Agreement to include additional services as described in CONSULTANT’s letter/proposal dated July 18, 2022, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is willing and able to provide such additional services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. CONSULTANT shall provide additional services as described in Exhibit “A” of this First Amendment to Agreement.
2 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D005\P004\00069257.DOCX; 8/8/2022]

2. Section 2 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY shall pay two million, six hundred fifteen thousand, six hundred twentyseven dollars ($2,615,627), in consideration of the additional services as set forth in Exhibit “A” to the first Amendment to Agreement. This brings the total not to exceed contract amount to nine million, four thousand, nine hundred seventy-seven dollars ($9,004,977).”

3. Section 3 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties’ intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.”

4. Section 11 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without

4 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D005\P004\00069257.DOCX; 8/8/2022] and
ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY: _______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________
RICHARD D. PLECKER
Environmental Utilities Director
Assistant Secretary
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D005\P004\00069257.DOCX:08/08/2022] EXHIBIT “A”
Construction Management Services
for
Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant
Energy Recovery and Expansion Projects
Amendment 1 - Scope of Services and Fee
Prepared for
City of Roseville
July 18, 2022
1 ERP and EP Project Amendment FINAL
Scope of Services
Introduction
The following Scope of Services has been prepared by Brown and Caldwell (BC) for additional construction management and inspection services for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP) Energy Recovery Project (ERP) and Expansion Project (EP). This scope is an amendment to the original contact scope and fee dated September 6, 2017. This amendment covers the additional time assumed to be needed to complete construction. The original scope of services was based on a 36-month contract duration for the ERP with an expected completion date of March 2022 and 30-month contract duration for the EP with an expected completion date of September 2022. This amendment covers the revised completion date for BC services through the end of October 2023 for both projects, which is an additional 19 months for the ERP and 13 months for the EP. Based on actual project spending to date, BC’s original budget will cover services through the end of August 2023. The fee included in this amendment covers 11 months during active construction (September 2022 through July 2023) and 3 months for final close out items (August 2023 through October 2023).

Phase 202 – Fire Tracking:

Scope in this phase includes construction management and inspection services for work associated with the fire damage at the primary clarifiers. This effort will be tracked separately because costs may be reimbursed by the contractor’s insurance. Fire Tracking effort is assumed to take 6 months (March 2022 through August 2022). BC scope items include:
• Attending weekly status meeting.
• Reviewing contractor submittals, letters, and meeting material. • Providing full time inspection while contractor is performing any work related to the fire damage.
• Construction management staff, Elizabeth Durazo (8 hours/month) and Tim Hansen (8 hours/month), and Inspection staff, Tony Knapp (30 hours/month) and Dan Anderson (80 hours/month), anticipate spending approximately 126 hours/month for 6 months.

Phase 500 – Additional ERP Construction Management Services and Phase 501 – Additional EP Construction Management Services:

Scope in this phase includes construction management, field inspections, startup and testing, commissioning, and close out activities, per the original scope covered in Task 2 and 3 of the September 6, 2017 contract, to cover the additional time associated with construction. BC scope items include:
• Construction Management Services within the amendment includes (time split 25% to the ERP and 75% to the EP unless otherwise noted):
2 ERP and EP Project Amendment FINAL
o Lead Construction Manager, Tim Hansen – approximately 173 hours/month from September 2022 through February 2023.
o Construction Manager, Elizabeth Durazo – approximately 90 hours/month for 11 months.
o Schedule Reviewer, Jason Barber – 8 hours/month for 9 months, plus 16 hours/Time Impact Analysis (TIA) with an anticipated amount of 15 TIAs to be received for the EP.
• Field Inspections services within this amendment includes (time split 25% to the ERP and 75% to the EP unless otherwise noted):
o Casey Kirk – approximately 173 hours/month for 11 months, 32 hrs/month for 3 close out months.
o Tony Knapp – approximately 173 hours/month for 11 months, 32 hrs/month for 3 close out months
o Dane Forsberg – 108 hours/month for 10 months.
o Manvir Badyal – 173 hours/month for 7 months.
o Dan Anderson – approximately 173 hours/month for 4 months on the EP (non- fire repair related inspection).
• Construction Contract Administration services within this amendment include:
o Iris Uresti – 80 hours/month for 11 months, time to be split 25% to the ERP and 75% to the EP.
• Startup/Testing and Commissioning services within this amendment include:
o Leslie Knapp – 90 hours/month for 10 months, time to be split 700 hours to the ERP and 200 hours to the EP.
o Lance Salerno – 12 hours/month for 10 months on the EP.

Phase 600 – Additional ERP Project Management:

Scope in this phase includes project management services. BC scope items within this amendment include:
• Monthly Invoicing and Project Tracking for an additional 14 months consisting of 70 hours for Elizabeth Durazo, 70 hours for Jacki Bates and 70 hours for Lindsay Surio. • Monthly Sponsor Meeting Attendance and Project Oversight for an additional 8 months consisting of 16 hours for Adam Ross.

Phase 601 – Additional EP Management:

Scope in this phase includes project management services. BS scope items within this amendment include:
3 ERP and EP Project Amendment FINAL
• Monthly Invoicing and Project Tracking for an additional 14 months consisting of 70 hours for Elizabeth Durazo, 70 hours for Jackie Bates, and 70 hours for Lindsay Surio. • Monthly Sponsor Meetings and Project Oversight for an additional 8 months consisting of 48 hours for Adam Ross.

Phase 700 – Construction Risk Support:

Scope in this phase includes risk management services. BS scope items within this amendment include:
• David Sapp to provide input and review of key response letters, emails, and approaches related to contractor documentation issues, 23 hours/month for 8 months.

Unanticipated Construction Management and Inspection Services Based on the construction uncertainties, an unanticipated construction management and inspection services amount of $200,000 is included as part of this amendment. Release of these funds requires approval by the City’s Project Manager.

Assumptions
• Construction for the ERP completed in June 2023.
• Construction for the EP completed in July 2023.
• 3 months of close out activities for construction management and inspection staff (August 2023 through October 2023), approximately 32 hours/month. • Extension of the use of Procore Software included as an expense based on an additional 14 months.
• Mobile inspection equipment - Verizon bill for iPad’s used during field inspections $120/month total for 11 months.
• Mileage estimated at $1000/month for 10 months on the ERP and $1000/month for 11 months on the EP.
• Airfare, lodging, and food estimated at $1,000/trip for 3 trips total. • Labor rates are based on a 2.75 multiplier
• Labor rate increase of approximately 4% is assumed based on actual rate increases starting January 1, 2023.

SCHEDULE
Amendment 1 tasks will be conducted during the construction and commissioning period, which is expected to be completed by June 2023 for the ERP and July 2023 for the EP, and notices of completion issued by October 2023.

FEE
The overall effort associated with the Amendment 1 additional services is $2,615,627, increasing the total budget from $6,389,350 to $9,004,977. A detailed breakdown by task and by labor hours is included in Attachment A.

A
ERP and EP Project Amendment FINAL
Attachment A: Amendment Fee Estimate
Roseville, City of (CA) -- PG Expn and Energy Recovery Durazo, Elizabeth R Bates, Jacqueline R Hansen, Timothy W Salerno, Lance P Uresti, Irasema Knapp, Leslie A Ross,Adam DKnapp,Anthony JForsberg,Dane CAnderson,Daniel CBadyal,Manvir SBarber,Jason RKirk,CaseySurio,Lindsay BSapp,David AAirfareLodging and FoodSuppliesBC MileageMobile Inspection Equip.ProcoreRec/ExpUnanticipated CM/Inspection Services Phase Phase Description PM PA
Total
Labor
Hours
Total
Labor
Effort
Total
ODCs
Total
Expense
Cost
Total
Expense
Effort
Total
Effort
$276.13 $118.44 $244.94 $284.60 $115.50 $197.18 $294.50 $162.11 $138.82 $139.78 $187.69 $129.94 $203.09 $92.29 $272.75 Leave Blank and Protected
202 Fire Tracking 48 0 48 0 0 0 0 180 0 480 0 0 0 0 0 756 121,287 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121,287 Leave Blank and Protected
500 Add'l ERP CM 248 0 248 0 220 200 0 500 270 0 303 18 500 0 0 2,507 482,827 1,000 1,000 1,000 10,000 1,320 400 0 14,720 14,720 14,720 497,547 Leave Blank and Protected
501 Add'l Expansion CM 750 0 746 120 660 700 0 1,500 810 731 908 294 1,500 0 0 8,719 1,641,459 2,000 2,000 1,000 11,000 0 400 200,000 216,400 216,400 216,400 1,857,859 Leave Blank and Protected
600 Add'l ERP PM 70 70 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 226 39,568 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39,568 Leave Blank and Protected
601 Add'l Expansion PM 70 70 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 258 49,180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49,180 Leave Blank and Protected
Leave Blank and Protected
700 Construction Risk Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 184 50,185 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,185 Leave Blank and Protected
GRAND TOTAL 1,186 140 1,042 120 880 900 64 2,180 1,080 1,211 1,211 312 2,000 140 184 12,650 2,384,507 3,000 3,000 2,000 21,000 1,320 800 200,000 231,120 231,120 231,120 2,615,627 Hours and Dollars are rounded to nearest whole number. To display decimals, change the format of the cells.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2274
File #: 0800-03
Title: 2021 Power Source Disclosure Reports and 2021 Power Content Labels Contact: David Siao 916-746-1613 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 9/7/2022
Item #: 7.24.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the 2021 Power Source Disclosure Reports and 2021 Power Content Labels. There is no fiscal impact with the approval of these reports.

BACKGROUND
Senate Bill (SB) 1305, approved in 1997, directs all California retail suppliers of electricity to disclose to consumers the sources of energy used to provide the electric service in an accurate, reliable and simple to understand manner. The SB 1305 Report is referred to as the Power Source Disclosure (PSD) Report. The data contained in the PSD Reports are subsequently used to prepare the annual Power Content Labels (PCLs), which are mailed to Roseville’s customers and posted on Roseville Electric’s website.

Beginning in 2019, Roseville has two electricity products: its general electricity product and its Roseville Community Solar product. The regulations requires utilities to engage a third-party certified public accountant to perform an audit to verify the PSD Report and PCL for each of Roseville Electric’s electricity products. Alternatively, publicly owned electric utilities, like Roseville, are exempt from this requirement if its City Council attests to the veracity of the annual reports per the regulations. This resolution approves the 2021 PSD reports and PCLs, serving as the attestation to the veracity of these submissions. This attestation is required by October 1st of each year.

Roseville’s contracts provide flexibility to energy providers on the timing of renewable energy deliveries, which can result in year to year variability in Roseville’s power sources. Roseville’s existing contracts ensure it will be in full compliance with the State Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) through 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of the 2021 Power Source Disclosure Reports and 2021 Power Content Labels.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
David Siao, Electric Resources Analyst
Dan Beans, Electric Utility Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-333
2021 PSDAnnual Report - Roseville Electric
Roseville 2021 Power Content Label
2021 PSDAnnual Report Community Solar - Roseville Electric 2021 PSDAnnual Report Community Solar - Roseville Electric Attestation RESOLUTION NO. 22-333
APPROVING SUBMISSION OF THE 2021 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORTS AND 2021 POWER CONTENT LABELS, AND ATTESTATION OF THE

VERACITY OF THE ANNUAL REPORTS
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1305 (SB 1305), adopted in 1997 and now codified in California Public Utilities Code sections 398.1-398.5, established a Power Source Disclosure Program that requires retail sellers of electricity to annually submit power source disclosure reports to the California Energy Commission (CEC); and
WHEREAS, the SB 1305 Report is referred to as the Power Source Disclosure (PSD) Report and Roseville Electric Utility submits PSD Reports to the California EnergyCommission (CEC) by October 1st of each year; and
WHEREAS, Roseville Electric Utility is a retail seller of electricity as defined by the Power Source Disclosure Program, and
WHEREAS, publicly owned utilities (POUs), such as Roseville Electric Utility, are exempt from the annual audit requirements if the governing body of the POU approves at a public meeting the submission to the CEC of an attestation of the veracity of the annual report, and
WHEREAS, Roseville Electric Utility staff has prepared the 2020 Power Source Disclosure Annual Reports and the 2021 Power Content Labels to the CEC in accordance with the Power Source Disclosure Program requirements and deadlines.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that it has approved the submission of the 2021 Power Source Disclosure Annual Reports and the 2021 Power Content Labels to the CEC and hereby provides attestation of the veracity of the annual reports submitted by staff.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call.

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
Version: May 2022
If you have questions, contact Power Source Disclosure (PSD) staff at [email protected] or (916) 805-7439.

NOTE: Information submitted in this report is not automatically held confidential. If your company wishes the information submitted to be considered confidential an authorized representative must submit an application for confidential designation (CEC-13), which can be found on the California Energy Commissions's website at https://www.energy.ca.gov/about/divisions-and-offices/chief-counsels-office.

WEBSITE URL FOR

PCL POSTING
https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/electric_util ity/about_us/reports___publications/power_content_label Submit the Annual Report and signed Attestation in PDF format with the Excel version of the Annual Report to [email protected]. Remember to complete the Retail Supplier Name, Electricity Portfolio Name, and contact information above, and submit separate reports and attestations for each additional portfolio if multiple were offered in the previous year.

CITY, STATE, ZIP Roseville, CA 95747
PHONE 916-746-1613
EMAIL [email protected]
NAME David Siao
TITLE Electric Resources Planner
MAILING ADDRESS 2090 Hilltop Circle

CONTACT INFORMATION
2021 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT
For the Year Ending December 31, 2021

RETAIL SUPPLIER NAME
City of Roseville

ELECTRICITY PORTFOLIO NAME
Roseville Electric
Retail suppliers are required to use the posted template and are not allowed to make edits to this format. Please complete all requested information.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Version: May 2022
Schedule 1: Procurements and Retail Sales
Schedule 2: Retired Unbundled RECs
Schedule 3: Annual Power Content Label Data
GHG Emissions Factors
Specified Purchases: A Specified Purchase refers to a transaction in which electricity is traceable to specific generating facilities by any auditable contract trail or equivalent, such as a tradable commodity system, that provides commercial verification that the electricity claimed has been sold once and only once to retail consumers. Do not enter data in the grey fields. For specified purchases, include enter following information for each line item:

Facility Name - Provide the name used to identify the facility.

Fuel Type - Provide the resource type (solar, natural gas, etc.) that this facility uses to generate electricity.

Location - Provide the state or province in which the facility is located.

Identification Numbers - Provide all applicable identification numbers from the Western Renewable Energy Generation Information System (WREGIS), the Energy Information Agency (EIA), and the California Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS).

Gross Megawatt Hours Procured - Provide the quantity of electricity procured in MWh from the generating facility.

Megawatt Hours Resold - Provide the quantity of electricity resold at wholesale.

Unspecified Power: Unspecified Power refers to electricity that is not traceable to specific generation sources by any auditable contract trail or equivalent, or to power purchases from a transaction that expressly transferred energy only and not the RECs associated from a facility. Do not enter procurements of unspecified power. The schedule will calculate unspecified power procurements automatically.

Complete this schedule by entering information about unbundled REC retirements in the previous calendar year.

Retail suppliers of electricity must complete this schedule by entering information about all power procurements and generation that served the identified electricity portfolio covered in this filing in the prior year. The schedule is divided into sections: directly delivered renewables, firmed-and-shaped imports, specified non-renewables, and procurements from ACSs. Insert additional rows as needed to report all procurements or generation serving the subject product. Provide the annual retail sales for the subject product in the appropriate space. At the bottom of Schedule 1, provide the retail suppliers’ other electricity end-uses that are not retail sales, such as transmission and distribution losses. Retail suppliers shall submit a purchase agreement or ownership arrangement documentation substantiating that any eligible firmed-andshaped product for which it is claiming an exclusion was executed prior to January 1, 2019. Any retail supplier that offered multiple electricity portfolios in the prior year must submit separate Annual Reports for each portfolio offered.

Schedule 2 - Retired Unbundled Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) Schedule 3 - Annual Power Content Label Data
Asset-Controlling Supplier (ACS) Procurement Calculator PSD Attestation

INSTRUCTIONS
Schedule 1 - Procurements and Retail Sales

INTRODUCTION
Retail suppliers are required to submit separate Annual Reports for each electricity portfolio offered to California retail consumers in the previous calendar year. Enter the Retail Supplier Name and Electricity Portfolio Name at the top of Schedule 1, Schedule 2, Schedule 3, and the Attestation.

A complete Annual Report includes the following tabs:

PSD Intro
Instructions
Version: May 2022
ACS Resource Mix Calculator
GHG Emissions Factors
Attestation
Retail suppliers may report specified purchases from ACS system power if the ACS provided its fuel mix of its specified system mix to the Energy Commission. Use the calculator to determine the resource-specific procurement quantities, and transfer them to Schedule 1.

This template provides the attestation that must be submitted with the Annual Report to the Energy Commission, stating that the information contained in the applicable schedules is correct and that the power has been sold once and only once to retail consumers. This attestation must be included in the package that is transmitted to the Energy Commission.

Please provide the complete Annual Report in Excel format and the complete Annual Report with signed attestation in PDF format as well.

This tab will be displayed for informational purposes only; it will not be used by reporting entities, since the emissions factors below auto-populate in the relevant fields on Schedules 1 & 3.

This schedule is provided as an automated worksheet that uses the information from Schedule 1 to calculate the power content and GHG emissions intensity for each electricity portfolio. The percentages calculated on this worksheet should be used for your Power Content Label.

Version: May 2022
1,062,639
1,320,385
-
257,747
523,902
720
795,763
131,650

0.1239

DIRECTLY DELIVERED RENEWABLES
Facility Name Fuel Type
State or
Province WREGIS ID RPS ID N/A EIA ID
Gross MWh
Procured
MWh
Resold
Net MWh
Procured
Adjusted Net MWh
Procured
GHG Emissions
Factor (in MT
CO2e/MWh)
GHG Emissions (in
MT CO2e) N/A
Blackwell Solar CA W4587 61892 58711 339 339 339 - -
Cape Scott Wind - Cape Scott Wind Wind BC W3959 60600 P149 24,576 24,576 24,576 - - Dokie Wind - Dokie Wind Wind BC W1992 61360 P150 22,205 22,205 22,205 - - Geothermal 1_Unit 1 - Geothermal 1 Geothermal CA W1254 60908 7368 27,764 27,764 27,764 0.0450 1,248 Geothermal 1_Unit 1 & 2 Onsite Load - Geotherm Geothermal CA W4883 60908 7368 720 720 720 0.0450 32 Geothermal 1_Unit 2 - Geothermal 1 Geothermal CA W1255 60908 7368 43,283 43,283 43,283 0.0450 1,946 Geothermal 2_Unit 4 - Geothermal 2 Geothermal CA W1257 60911 7369 40,818 40,818 40,818 0.0812 3,314 Geothermal Solar Unit_1 - Geo_Solar_1 ClearlakSolar CA W1509 62040 7368 95 95 95 0.0450 4 Geothermal Solar Unit_2 - Geo_Solar_2 MiddletoSolar CA W2792 62041 7369 133 133 133 0.0812 11 Juniper Canyon - Juniper Canyon Wind WA W1690 61202 57320 48,365 48,365 48,365 - - Klondike III - Klondike Wind Power III LLC Wind OR W237 60602 56468 4,270 4,270 4,270 - - Leaning Juniper II - Leaning Juniper II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 68,752 68,752 68,752 - - Lewiston Powerplant - Lewiston Eligible hydro CA W1108 61044 977 125 125 125 - - Lost Hills Solar CA W4586 61893 58711 560 560 560 - -
Nimbus Powerplant - Nimbus Plant (2) Eligible hydro CA W1161 61045 444 1,354 1,354 1,354 - - Quality Wind - Quality Wind Wind BC W3160 62247 P154 28,219 28,219 28,219 - - Spicer_1_Units - Spicer Meadow Project Eligible hydro CA W1260 61580 54554 872 872 872 - - Stampede Powerplant - Stampede (2) Eligible hydro CA W1177 61046 7066 208 208 208 - - Klondike IIIa - Klondike Wind Power IIIa Wind OR W817 60694 56468 33,613 33,613 33,613 - - Sly Creek Powerhouse - Sly Creek Powerhouse Eligible hydro CA W701 60267 776 25 25 25 - - Kelly Ridge Powerhouse - Kelly Ridge PowerHouEligible hydro CA W761 60266 418 487 487 487 - -

FIRMED-AND-SHAPED IMPORTS
Facility Name Fuel Type
State or
Province WREGIS ID RPS ID
EIA ID of
REC
Source
EIA ID of
Substitute
Power
Gross MWh
Procured MWh Resold
Net MWh
Procured
Adjusted Net MWh
Procured
GHG Emissions
Factor (in MT
CO2e/MWh)
GHG Emissions
(in MT CO2e)
Eligible for
Grandfathered
Emissions?
Juniper Canyon - Juniper Canyon Wind WA W1690 61202 57320 57320 11,949 11,949 11,949 - - Juniper Canyon - Juniper Canyon Wind WA W1690 61202 57320 56468 25 25 25 - - Juniper Canyon - Juniper Canyon Wind WA W1690 61202 57320 56360 3,034 3,034 3,034 - - Leaning Juniper II - Leaning Juniper II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 3883 150 150 150 - - Leaning Juniper II - Leaning Juniper II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 56361 478 478 478 - - Leaning Juniper II - Leaning Juniper II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 Unspecified 2,212 2,212 2,212 0.4280 947 Leaning Juniper II - Leaning Juniper II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 57320 12,495 12,495 12,495 - - Leaning Juniper II - Leaning Juniper II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 55103 4,074 4,074 4,074 0.4076 1,660 Leaning Juniper II - Leaning Juniper II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 56468 2,887 2,887 2,887 - - Leaning Juniper II - Leaning Juniper II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 56468 4,951 4,951 4,951 - - Leaning Juniper II - Leaning Juniper II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 56468 12,621 12,621 12,621 - -

SPECIFIED NON-RENEWABLE PROCUREMENTS
Facility Name Fuel Type
State or
Province N/A N/A N/A EIA ID
Gross MWh
Procured MWh Resold
Net MWh
Procured
Adjusted Net MWh
Procured
GHG Emissions
Factor (in MT
CO2e/MWh)
GHG Emissions
(in MT CO2e) N/A
Folsom Large hydro CA 441 4,039 4,039 4,039 - -
Gianelli Large hydro CA 448 2,921 2,921 2,921 - -
JF Carr Large hydro CA 442 10,582 10,582 10,582 - -
Spring Creek Large hydro CA 450 8,442 8,442 8,442 - -
Retail Sales (MWh)
Net Specified Procurement (MWh)
Unspecified Power (MWh)
Procurement to be adjusted
2021 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE 1: PROCUREMENTS AND RETAIL SALES
For the Year Ending December 31, 2021
City of Roseville
Roseville Electric
GHG Emissions Intensity (in MT CO2e/MWh)
Net Specified Natural Gas
Net Specified Coal & Other Fossil Fuels
Net Specified Nuclear, Large Hydro, Renewables, and ACS Power GHG Emissions (excludes grandfathered emissions)
Instructions: Enter information about power procurements underlying this electricity portfolio for which your company is filing the Annual Report.

Insert additional rows as needed. All fields in white should be filled out. Fields in grey auto-populate as needed and should not be filled out. For EIA IDs for unspecified power or specified system mixes from asset-controlling suppliers, enter "Unspecified Power", "BPA", or "Tacoma Power" as applicable. For specified procurements of ACS power, use the ACS Procurement Calculator to calculate the resource breakdown comprising the ACS system mix. Procurements of unspecified power must not be entered as line items below; unspecified power will be calculated automatically in cell N9. Unbundled RECs must not be entered on Schedule 1; these products must be entered on Schedule 2. At the bottom portion of the schedule, provide the other electricity end-uses that are not retail sales including, but not limited to transmission and distribution losses or municipal street lighting. Amounts should be in megawatt-hours.

Version: May 2022
Keswick Large hydro CA 443 8,221 8,221 8,221 - -
New Melones Large hydro CA 6158 12,229 12,229 12,229 - - Oneill Large hydro CA 446 338 338 338 - -
Shasta Large hydro CA 445 26,859 26,859 26,859 - -
Trinity Large hydro CA 451 7,869 7,869 7,869 - -
Collierville Large Hydro CA 54555 22,518 22,518 22,518 - - NCPA STIG Natural Gas CA 7449 11,153 11,153 5,666 0.3934 2,229 REP Natural Gas CA 56298 502,311 502,311 255,186 0.4326 110,382 RPP2 Natural Gas CA 7452 10,438 10,438 5,303 0.8845 4,690 Forbestown Large hydro CA 417 575 575 575 - -
Woodleaf Large hydro CA 419 394 394 394 - -
Mid-C Hydro - Wanapum (Grant County PUD) Large hydro WA 3888 1,780 1,780 1,780 - - Mid-C Hydro - Priest Rapids and Wanapum dams Large hydro WA 3887 50,542 50,542 50,542 - - Boundary Hydroelectric Units Large Hydro WA 6433 30,563 30,563 30,563 - - Rock Island/Rocky Reach Large hydro WA 6200 720 720 720 - - Powell River Generation (Catalyst Paper) (CAN) Other BC P375 720 720 720 1.1111 800

PROCUREMENTS FROM ASSET-CONTROLLING SUPPLIERS
Facility Name Fuel Type N/A N/A N/A N/A EIA ID
Gross MWh
Procured MWh Resold
Net MWh
Procured
Adjusted Net MWh
Procured
GHG Emissions
Factor (in MT
CO2e/MWh)
GHG Emissions
(in MT CO2e) N/A
Bonneville Power Administration (Asset-Controllin Large Hydro BPA 165,896 165,896 0.0211 3,500 Bonneville Power Administration (Asset-Controllin Nuclear BPA 23,083 23,083 0.0211 487 Bonneville Power Administration (Asset-Controllin Other BPA 1,683 1,683 0.0211 36 Bonneville Power Administration (Asset-Controllin Unspecified power BPA 10,856 10,856 0.0211 229 Tacoma Power (Asset-Controlling Supplier) Large Hydro Tacoma Power 3,415 3,415 0.0337 115 Tacoma Power (Asset-Controlling Supplier) Unspecified power Tacoma Power 308 308 0.0337 10 Tacoma Power (Asset-Controlling Supplier) Nuclear Tacoma Power 272 272 0.0337 9 END USES OTHER THAN RETAIL SALES MWh
Self load 40,005.86
T&D losses (including streetlights) 43,172
Version: May 2022
55,200

RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS
Facility Name Fuel Type
State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)
Central Oregon Irrigation District Siphon Hydr Hydro OR 61357 5,077 Juniper Canyon Wind WA 61202 4,903
Central Oregon Irrigation District Juniper Ridg Hydro OR 61358 2,541 Middle Fork Irrigation District Hydro System Hydro OR 61383 6,688 Farmers Irrigation District Hydro OR 61366 5,439
Klondike III Wind WA 60602 4,409
Leaning Juniper II Wind WA 61200 26,143
Total Retired Unbundled RECs
2021 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE 2: RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS
For the Year Ending December 31, 2021
City of Roseville
Roseville Electric
INSTRUCTIONS: Enter information about retired unbundled RECs associated with this electricity portfolio. Insert additional rows as needed. All fields in white should be filled out. Fields in grey autopopulate as needed and should not be filled out.

Version: May 2022
Adjusted Net
Procured (MWh)
Percent of Total
Retail Sales
Renewable Procurements 401,659 37.8%
Biomass & Biowaste - 0.0%
Geothermal 112,585 10.6%
Eligible Hydroelectric 3,071 0.3%
Solar 1,127 0.1%
Wind 284,876 26.8%
Coal - 0.0%
Large Hydroelectric 357,902 33.7%
Natural gas 266,155 25.0%
Nuclear 23,355 2.2%
Other 2,403 0.2%
Unspecified Power 11,164 1.1%
Total 1,062,639 100.0%
1,062,639
273

5.2%
Total Retail Sales (MWh)
GHG Emissions Intensity (converted to lbs CO2e/MWh)
Percentage of Retail Sales Covered by Retired Unbundled RECs
2021 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE 3: POWER CONTENT LABEL DATA
For the Year Ending December 31, 2021
City of Roseville
Roseville Electric
Instructions: No data input is needed on this schedule. Retail suppliers should use these auto-populated calculations to fill out their Power Content Labels.

Version: May 2022
Facility Name EIA ID or Proxy ID
GHG Emissions
Factor (in MT
CO2e/MWh)
Bonneville Power Administration (AssetControlling Supplier) BPA 0.0211 Tacoma Power (Asset-Controlling Supplier) Tacoma Power 0.0337 Unspecified Power Unspecified Power 0.4280
AES Alamitos, LLC 315 0.4652
AES Huntington Beach, LLC 335 0.3962
AES Redondo Beach LLC 356 0.7812
Air Products Wilmington Hydrogen Plant 55557 4.2979
Algonquin Power Sanger, LLC 57564 0.3868
LAR ARCO Watson Cogeneration 50216 0.7581
LAR Tesoro Equilon Los Angeles Refining 50530 0.7581
Calciner 10601 1.1273
Badger Creek Limited 10650 0.5044
Bear Mountain Limited 10649 0.4887
Biola University 54296 0.0227
Blythe Energy 55295 0.4124
Braun Medical Inc 50200 1.4628
California State University, Channel Islands 50851 0.8412 CP Kelco San Diego 52147 0.5375
CalEnergy Operating Corporation - J J Elmore -
Geothermal 10634 0.0218
CalEnergy Operating Corporation - J M Leathers
- Geothermal 10631 0.0785
CalEnergy Operating Corporation - Region 1 -
Geothermal 10878 0.0749
CalEnergy Operating Corporation - Region 1 -
Geothermal 10879 0.0749
CalEnergy Operating Corporation - Region 1 -
Geothermal 10759 0.0749

INDEX OF GENERATOR-SPECIFIC GHG EMISSIONS

FACTORS
Instructions: This tab is for informational purposes only; it will not be used by reporting entities, since the emissions factors below auto-populate in the relevant fields on Schedules 1 & 3.

Version: May 2022
CalEnergy Operating Corporation - Region 1 -
Geothermal 54996 0.0749
CalEnergy Operating Corporation - Region 1 -
Geothermal 55983 0.0749
CalEnergy Operating Corporation - Region 2 -
Geothermal 55984 0.0677
CalEnergy Operating Corporation - Region 2 -
Geothermal 10632 0.0677
CalEnergy Operating Corporation - Region 2 -
Geothermal 50210 0.0677
Midway Peaking, LLC 56639 0.6164
CalPeak Power - Enterprise 55513 0.5840
California Institute of Technology (CalTech) 10262 0.2608 California Power Holdings, LLC-Chowchilla
Facility, 95360 56185 0.5570
California Power Holdings, LLC-Red Bluff
Facility, 96080 56184 0.5600
California State University, San Diego 50061 0.4018
California State University, San Jose 10548 0.5070
Calpine - CCFC Sutter Energy, LLC 55112 0.4140
Calpine - Delta Energy Center, LLC 55333 0.3880
Calpine - Gilroy Cogen, L.P., Gilroy
Cogen_Peaker 55810 0.5257
ProEnergy - Greenleaf Energy Unit 2, LLC 10349 0.5118
Calpine - King City Cogen, LLC, King City
Cogen_Peaker 10294 0.4144
Calpine - Los Esteros Critical Energy Facility, LLC 55748 0.4667 Calpine - Los Medanos Energy Center, LLC 55217 0.3524
Calpine - Metcalf Energy Center, LLC 55393 0.3910
Calpine - O.L.S. Energy - Agnews Inc. 95134 50748 0.5348 Calpine - Otay Mesa Energy Center 55345 0.3862
Calpine - Pastoria Energy Facility L.L.C. 55656 0.3760
Carson Hybrid Energy Storage LLC 10169 0.5754
Chalk Cliff Limited 50003 0.3927
Chevron Products Company - El Segundo
Refinery, 90245 10213 2.4095
Chevron Products Company - Richmond
Refinery, 94802 52109 1.5011
Civic Center Cogen, LA County 10623 0.2108
Phillips 66 Company - San Francisco Refinery 50119 0.6913 Version: May 2022
Phillips 66 Company - San Francisco Carbon
Plant 50388 1.6641
Phillips 66 Company - Los Angeles Refinery -
Wilmington Plant 54451 1.8335
Phillips 66 Company - Santa Maria Refinery 56284 22.6899 Coso Energy Developers (BLM E&W) -
Geothermal 10875 0.4474
Coso Finance Partners (Navy I) - Geothermal 10873 0.1494 Coso Power Developers (Navy II) - Geothermal 10874 0.3102 Crockett Cogeneration Project, LP 55084 0.3308
Grade 6 Oil, LLC 54410 0.7517
Double C Limited 50493 0.5495
Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC 260 0.3797
Dynegy Oakland, LLC. 6211 1.0327
E.F. Oxnard LLC 10776 0.4951
City of Colton - Generation 55951 0.6040
Torrance Refinery 50624 6.3137
Frito Lay - Kern Plant 10110 1.2111
Hanford Energy Park Peaker 55698 0.6141
Henrietta Peaker Plant 55807 0.5851
Goal Line LP, 92025 54749 0.4944
Grayson Power Plant 377 0.8088
High Desert Power Project, LLC 55518 0.4185
High Sierra Limited 50495 0.5537
Imperial Irrigation District (IID), El Centro
Generating Station 389 0.4514
Imperial Irrigation District (IID), Niland Gas
Turbine Plant 56569 0.5327
New-Indy Oxnard LLC 57585 0.3149
KES Kingsburg L.P.--Kingsburg Cogeneration
Facility 10405 0.5262
Kern Front Limited 50494 0.5488
Kern River Cogeneration Facility 10496 0.3205
Kimberly Clark Worldwide Inc. 58083 0.3869
Kyocera International Inc. 10720 0.7219
La Paloma Generating Plant - GHG 55151 0.4048
Bridge Energy, LLC 56090 1.0172
Live Oak Limited 54768 0.4938
Loma Linda University 10206 0.3812
Los Angeles Department of Water & PowerHarbor Generating Station (LADWP) 399 0.5515 Version: May 2022
Los Angeles Department of Water & PowerHaynes Generating Station (LADWP) 400 0.4039 Los Angeles Department of Water & PowerScattergood Generating Station (LADWP) 404 0.4204 Los Angeles Department of Water & PowerValley Generating Station (LADWP) 408 0.3937 Luz Solar Partners LTD VIII & IX 10444 0.0686
Luz Solar Partners LTD VIII & IX 10446 0.0686
Malaga Power, LLC 56239 0.5680
Malburg Generating Station 56041 0.4394
Martinez Cogen Limited Partnership 10342 0.3225
McKittrick Limited 50612 0.4014
Midway-Sunset Cogeneration 52169 0.2302
Modesto Irrigation District (MID) - Woodland
Generation Station, 95351 7266 0.4802
Modesto Irrigation District - Ripon Generation
Station, 95366 56135 0.6242
NRG Energy - El Segundo 330 0.4740
NRG Energy - El Segundo 57901 0.4740
NRG Energy - Long Beach 341 0.8760
OLS Energy Chino 50850 0.9179
New-Indy Ontario, LLC Linerboard Mill 10427 0.8368
Ormat Nevada, Inc./ GEM 2 & 3 - Geothermal 54038 0.0349 Ormat Nevada, Inc./ GEM 2 & 3 - Geothermal 10763 0.0349 Ormond Beach Power, LLC 350 0.5731
PG&E Gateway Generating Station 56476 0.4027
PG&E Humboldt Bay Generating Station 246 0.4691
Panoche Energy Center, LLC 56803 0.5036
Pasadena Water and Power, Glenarm 422 0.6055
Pasadena Water and Power, Glenarm 420 0.6055
Qualcomm, Inc. - Morehouse Facility 59456 0.4138
Qualcomm, Inc. - Pacific Center Facility 59458 0.3067
Qualcomm, Inc. - Pacific Center Facility 59457 0.3067
Redding Electric Utility - Redding Power
Generation 7307 0.4498
Eco Services - Dominguez 52064 2.6718
Eco Services - Martinez 52063 0.5566
Riverside Public Utilities - Riverside Energy
Resource Center 56143 0.5926
SDG&E - Miramar Energy Facility 56232 0.5550
Version: May 2022
SDG&E - Palomar Energy Center 55985 0.3905
SRI International Cogen Project 50537 0.3423
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) ,
SCA 7551 0.3978
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) ,
SPA 7552 0.4381
Salinas River Cogeneration Facility 50865 0.3736
Searles Valley Minerals Inc. 10684 0.4908
Martinez Refining Company LLC 54912 2.4211
Silicon Valley Power (SVP), City of Santa Clara ,
Cogen 7232 0.6220
Silicon Valley Power (SVP), City of Santa Clara ,
DVR 56026 0.4422
Southern California Edison (SCE) - Pebbly Beach 6704 0.7707 Southern California Edison (SCE) -
Mountainview 358 0.4063
Sunrise Power Company 55182 0.3785
Sycamore Cogeneration Facility 50134 0.3427
Turlock Irrigation District (TID), Almond Power
Plant 7315 0.5601
Turlock Irrigation District/ Walnut Energy
Center 56078 0.4430
U.S. Borax, 93516 50115 0.3948
University of California, Irvine 57122 0.3162
University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA 52073 0.2894 University of California, San Francisco 58198 0.3426
University of California, Santa Cruz, UCSC EH&S
Office 50064 0.4760
Valero Refining Company - California, Benicia
Refinery and Benicia Asphalt Plant 55851 3.2853
Wildflower Energy, LP - Indigo Generation, LLC 55541 0.5756 Wildflower Energy, LP - Larkspur Energy
Facility, LLC 55542 0.5491
Yuba City Cogeneration Partners LP 52186 0.3894
Harbor Cogeneration Company, LLC 50541 0.6893
The P&G Paper Products Co. 50464 0.4041
AltaGas Ripon Energy Inc. 50299 0.5486
Canyon Power Project (CPP) 57027 0.5685
High Sierra Cogeneration 57977 0.3537
CalPeak Power - Border 55510 0.5731
SDG&E - Cuyamaca Peak Energy Plant 55512 0.6082
Version: May 2022
Tracy Combined Cycle Plant 55933 0.4500
Riverside Public Utilities - Clearwater Facility 56356 0.4731 Chevron AAPG 745 San Joaquin Basin 52086 1.1979
Chevron AAPG 745 San Joaquin Basin 52082 1.1979
Chevron AAPG 745 San Joaquin Basin 52076 1.1979
Chevron AAPG 745 San Joaquin Basin 52107 1.1979
Chevron AAPG 745 San Joaquin Basin 50751 1.1979
Chevron AAPG 745 San Joaquin Basin 52081 1.1979
Chevron AAPG 745 San Joaquin Basin 52085 1.1979
Chevron AAPG 745 San Joaquin Basin 52104 1.1979
California Resources Elk Hills, LLC - 35R Gas
Plant 55400 0.7836
PG&E Colusa Generating Station 56532 0.3885
Aera Energy Coastal Basins 55184 3.2643
Southern California Edison (SCE) - Barre Peaker 56474 0.5351 Southern California Edison (SCE) - Center
Hybrid 56475 0.5880
Southern California Edison (SCE) - Grapeland
Hybrid 56472 0.5729
Southern California Edison (SCE) - Mira Loma
Peaker 56473 0.5416
Roseville Electric, Roseville Energy Park 56298 0.4326
CalPeak Power - Panoche, LLC 55508 0.5850
CalPeak Power - Vaca Dixon, LLC 55499 0.5673
Calpine - Gilroy Energy Center, LLC, Feather
River 55847 0.6093
Calpine - Gilroy Energy Center, LLC, Riverview
Peaker 55963 0.6160
Calpine - Gilroy Energy Center, LLC, Wolfskill
Peaker 55855 0.1238
Naval Medical Center - San Diego 50963 0.5766
Orange Grove Energy Center 56914 0.6014
Northern California Power Agency -
Geothermal Plant No. 1 7368 0.0450
Northern California Power Agency -
Geothermal Plant No. 2 7369 0.0812
California Resources Production Corporation -
760 Los Angeles Basin 56051 0.6911
BWP/MPP Electricity Generating Facilities at
164 W. Magnolia 6013 0.4116
BWP/MPP Electricity Generating Facilities at
164 W. Magnolia 56077 0.4116
Version: May 2022
BWP/MPP Electricity Generating Facilities at
164 W. Magnolia 56046 0.4116
BWP/MPP Electricity Generating Facilities at
164 W. Magnolia 7987 0.4116
Escondido Energy Center, LLC 55538 0.5668
El Cajon Energy, LLC 57001 0.6111
Fresno Cogeneration Partners, LP 10156 0.6630
Chula Vista Energy Center 55540 1.0234
Sentinel Peak Resources - SJV Basin Facility 54447 2.8555 Sentinel Peak Resources - SJV Basin Facility 54449 2.8555 Signal Hill Petroleum Facilities 57702 1.0090
Berry Petroleum Company - San Joaquin Basin 50622 1.0003 Berry Petroleum Company - San Joaquin Basin 50170 1.0003 Mariposa Energy LLC 57483 0.5916
Richard J Donovan Correctional Facility 54936 2.2498
Marsh Landing Generating Station 57267 0.6016
Walnut Creek Energy, LLC 57515 0.5148
Sentinel Energy Center, LLC 57482 0.5293
Southern California Edison (SCE) - McGrath
Peaker 56471 0.5265
Lodi Energy Center 57978 0.3934
Lodi Energy Center 7449 0.3934
California State University, Fullerton 58169 0.5272
Kaweah Delta Medical Center 10042 850.8931
Saint Agnes Medical Center 54800 0.2208
Houweling Nurseries Oxnard, Inc 58432 0.5816
Olive View Medical Center, Los Angeles County
Department of Health Services 10884 0.2936
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego 10175 0.5100
Calpine - Russell City Energy Center 56467 0.3873
Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System 57074 0.0933
Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System 57073 0.0933
Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System 57075 0.0933
Delano Energy Center, LLC 58122 0.6444
Ormat Nevada, Inc. / ORNI 18 North Brawley -
Geothermal 56832 0.4587
University of California, Berkeley 50849 0.3400
Pacific Ethanol Madera, LLC 61989 3.4028
Sharp Grossmont Hospital 10115 0.29037
Pio Pico Energy Center 57555 0.53297
SunSelect Produce (California) Inc 61754 2.18951
Version: May 2022
Berry Petroleum Company - Placerita 52096 0.31146
Biomass One, L.P. 10869 0.0360
Clearwater Paper Corp. - Lewiston 50637 0.0445
Desert View Power 10300 0.0411
Kettle Falls Woodwaste Plant 550 0.0610
Longview Washington Pulp and Paper Mill 54562 0.0492
Loyalton Biomass Cogeneration (ARP) 50111 1.1111
Seneca Sustainable Energy 57457 0.0198
Sierra Pacific Burlington 56406 0.0090
Trans-Jordan Generating Station (Landfill Gas) 56853 0.0034 WestRock - Tacoma (formerly: Simpson
Biomass) 57099 0.0235
Agua Caliente Solar Project 57373 0.0000
Agua Fria Generating Station 141 0.6729
American Falls Solar 60011 0.0000
American Falls Solar II 60012 0.0000
Apache Generating Station 160 0.7298
Apache Solar 60964 0.0000
Apex Generating Station-Natural Gas Combined
Cycle 55514 0.3798
Arlington Valley Energy Facility-Natural Gas
Combined Cycle 55282 0.3949
Arlington Valley Solar Project II 57680 0.0000
Arlington Wind Power Project 56855 0.0000
Beaver 8073 0.5492
Bennett Mountain Power 55733 0.5846
Beowawe Power 10287 0.0606
Big Horn II-Wind 57319 0.0000
Big Horn PPM-Wind Power Project 56361 0.0000
Biglow Canyon Wind Farm (Phase 1) 56485 0.0000
Biglow Canyon Wind Farm (Phase 2) 56485 0.0000
Biglow Canyon Wind Farm (Phase 3) 56485 0.0000
Boardman Power Plant 6106 0.9884
Bonanza Power Plant 7790 0.9702
Boundary Hydroelectric Units 6433 0.0000
Box Canyon Dam (WA) 3891 0.0000
Broadview Energy JN, LLC 60145 0.0000
Broadview Energy KW, LLC 60152 0.0000
Brownlee 811 0.0000
Cabinet Gorge 833 0.0000
Caithness Shepherd's Flat - Horseshoe Bend
(Wind) 57550 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Caithness Shepherd's Flat - North Hurlburt
(Wind) 57526 0.0000
Caithness Shepherd's Flat - South Hurlburt
(Wind) 57549 0.0000
Campbell Hill Windpower Project (Three Buttes
Windpower LLC) 57090 0.0000
Carty Generating Station 58503 0.3854
Cedar Creek II 57210 0.0000
Cedar Creek Wind 56371 0.0000
Cedar Point Wind 57315 0.0000
Centennial Hardin (MT) 55749 1.5469
Chehalis 55662 0.4028
Cholla Power Station 113 1.1556
Chuck Lenzie Station 55322 0.4057
CJ Strike 812 0.0000
Clark Station 2322 0.5483
Colgate Powerhouse 454 0.0000
Collierville Hydro 54555 0.0000
Colstrip 6076 1.0646
Coolidge Generation Station 56948 0.5629
Copper Mountain Solar 1 (CM10) 56944 0.0000
Copper Mountain Solar 2 (CMS2) 58017 0.0000
Copper Mountain Solar 3 58915 0.0000
Copper Mountain Solar 4 (CMS4) 59814 0.0000
Coronado Generating Station 6177 1.2335
Cowiltz River Project (Mayfield Dam and
Mossyrock Dam) 3917 0.0000
Coyote Springs I 7350 0.3709
Craig 6021 1.0592
Crooked Falls 2181 0.0000
Currant Creek 56102 0.4008
Cushman Hydro Project (Cushman No. 1 Dam
and Cushman No. 2 Dam) 3914 0.0000
Dave Johnston 4158 1.1263
Desert Basin Generating Station 55129 0.4215
Desert Star Energy Center (formerly: Eldorado
Energy)-Natural Gas Combined Cycle 55077 0.4145
Don A. Campbell (Phase 2) Geothermal Plant 60419 0.0000 Don A. Campbell (Wild Rose) Geothermal Plant 58533 0.0000 Donnells Hydro 415 0.0000
Dunlap I 57299 0.0000
El Cabo Wind 58098 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Elkhorn Valley Wind Farm 56623 0.0000
Encogen Generating Station 7870 0.4777
Eurus Combine Hills II LLC 57137 0.0000
Evander Andrews Power Complex 7953 0.5898
Ferndale Generating Station 54537 0.4130
Fort Churchill Station 2330 0.6410
Four Corners Power Plant 2442 0.9916
Frank Tracy Station 2336 0.4450
Frederickson Power LP 55818 0.3829
Frederickson PSE 99 0.8607
Fredonia Generating Station 607 0.7892
Gala Solar (Solar Star Oregan II) 61048 0.0000
Galena 2 Geothermal Power Plant 56540 0.0000
Galena 3 Geothermal Power Plant 56541 0.0000
Gila River Power Station - Block 1 59338 0.4056
Gila River Power Station - Block 2 60768 0.3930
Gila River Power Station - Block 3 59784 0.4009
Gila River Power Station - Block 4 55306 0.4212
Glacier Wind Farm (Naturener) 57049 0.0000
Glen Canyon Dam 153 0.0000
Glenrock I 56841 0.0000
Glenrock III 56841 0.0000
Goldendale Generating Station 55482 0.3827
Goodnoe Hills 56666 0.0000
Goshen Phase II LLC 57211 0.0000
Grady Wind Energy Center, LLC 60317 0.0000
Grand View 2 West 60068 0.0000
Grays Harbor Energy 7999 0.3927
Griffith Energy, LLC 55124 0.4216
Harry Allen Station 7082 0.3919
Harvest Wind 57152 0.0000
Hay Canyon Wind 56790 0.0000
Headgate Rock Dam 7179 0.0000
Heber Geothermal 54689 0.0391
Hells Canyon 3013 0.0000
Hermiston 54761 0.4025
Hermiston Power, LLC 55328 0.3957
Higgins Generating Station 55687 0.4123
High Plains 57040 0.0000
High Winds 56075 0.0000
Holter Dam 2186 0.0000
Hoover Dam 154 0.0000
Hopkins Ridge Wind 56255 0.0000
Horse Butte Wind 57890 0.0000
Hunter 6165 0.9833
Version: May 2022
Huntington 8069 0.9998
ID Solar 1 60445 0.0000
Intermountain Power Project 6481 0.8998
Jim Bridger Total Plant 8066 1.0281
Judith Gap Wind Farm 56377 0.0000
Juniper Canyon Wind 57320 0.0000
Kerr 2188 0.0000
Kings Beach 6518 1.9430
Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project (Sagebrush
Power) 56858 0.0000
Klamath Falls Cogeneration 55103 0.4076
Klondike Windpower II 56359 0.0000
Klondike Windpower III 56468 0.0000
Klondike Windpower IIIA 56468 0.0000
Kyrene Generating Station 147 0.3780
Lake Chelan Hydroelectric Facility 6424 0.0000
Lake Side 56237 0.4077
Langley Gulch Power Plant 57028 0.3755
Las Vegas Generating Station 10761 0.4860
Leaning Juniper 56360 0.0000
Leaning Juniper II 57333 0.0000
Limon Wind I 58126 0.0000
Limon Wind II 58127 0.0000
Limon Wind III 59083 0.0000
Linden Wind Energy Project (aka Linden Ranch
Wind Farm) 57635 0.0000
Little Falls (WA) 3866 0.0000
Logan Wind Farm 56613 0.0000
Long Lake 3867 0.0000
Lower Baker 3855 0.0000
Lower Snake River Wind Energy Project 57195 0.0000
Lucky Peak Power Plant Project 10014 0.0000
Luning Solar 61084 0.0000
Macho Springs Solar Facility 59010 0.0000
Marengo Wind Farm I 56466 0.0000
Marengo Wind Farm II 56466 0.0000
McFadden Ridge 57039 0.0000
McGinness Hills 3 Geothermal Energy Facility 57446 0.0000 Merwin 3847 0.0000
Mesquite Generating Station - Block 1 58557 0.3764
Mesquite Generating Station - Block 2 55481 0.3800
Mesquite Solar 1 57707 0.0000
Mesquite Solar 2, LLC 60307 0.0000
Mesquite Solar 3, LLC 60308 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Mid-C Hydro - Priest Rapids and Wanapum
dams (Grant County PUD) 3887 0.0000
Mid-C Hydro - Rock Island (Chelan County PUD) 6200 0.0000 Mid-C Hydro - Rock Island and Rocky Reach
(Chelan County PUD) 3883 0.0000
Mid-C Hydro - Rocky Reach (Chelan County
PUD) 3883 0.0000
Mid-C Hydro - Wanapum (Grant County PUD) 3888 0.0000
Mid-C Hydro - Wells (Douglas County PUD) 3886 0.0000
Middle Fork Hydro 425 0.0000
Milford I Wind Farm 57079 0.0000
Milford II Wind Farm 57107 0.0000
Mint Farm Generation Station 55700 0.4073
Moapa Southern Paiute Solar 57859 0.0000
Monroe Street HED 9095 0.0000
Montague Wind Power Facility 58099 0.0000
Murphy Flat Solar 60009 0.0000
Narrows 2 Powerhouse 455 0.0000
Narrows PH 262 0.0000
Naughton 4162 1.0904
Neal Hot Springs Geothermal Plant 58022 0.0000
Nebo Power Station 56177 0.4538
Nine Canyon Wind Project 7936 0.0000
Nine Mile HED 3869 0.0000
Nisqually River Project (Alder Dam and
LaGrande Dam) 3913 0.0000
North Valmy Station 8224 1.0009
Northern Colorado Wind I 57290 0.0000
Northern Colorado Wind II 57290 0.0000
NorWest Energy 4 (Bonanza) 62268 0.0000
Noxon Rapids 2199 0.0000
Ocotillo 116 0.5097
Old Lahontan hydropower Plant 6521 0.0000
Orchard Avenue 1 (Yakima-Tieton ID) 50421 0.0000
Orchard Ranch Solar 60010 0.0000
Oxbow (Oregon) 3014 0.0000
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 6008 0.0000
Palouse Wind 57530 0.0000
Parker-Davis Project 447 0.0000
Patua Geothermal 58319 0.0000
Patua Solar Project 58319 0.0000
Pebble Springs 56789 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Peetz Table Wind Energy 56563 0.0000
Pelton Round Butte 3048 0.0000
Perrin Ranch Wind 58155 0.0000
Pleasant Valley Wind Energy Project 56093 0.0000
Port Westward 1 56227 0.3693
Port Westward 2 58266 0.4673
Post Falls Hydro 835 0.0000
Ralston Hydro 427 0.0000
Red Hawk Power Station CC Natural Gas 55455 0.3861
Richard Burdette Power Plant 56321 0.0000
Rim Rock Wind Farm (Naturener) 57995 0.0000
Rolling Hills 56842 0.0000
Sage Solar I 62399 0.0000
Sage Solar II 62399 0.0000
Sage Solar III 62399 0.0000
Saguaro 118 0.7874
San Emidio Project 57456 0.0670
San Juan 2451 1.1665
Santan Generating Station 8068 0.4070
Seven Mile Hill I 56843 0.0000
Seven Mile Hill II 56843 0.0000
Silverhawk Station 55841 0.4167
Simcoe Solar 60748 0.0000
Smith Falls Hydro Project 54249 0.0000
Snoqualmie Hydroelectric Project 3860 0.0000
South Point Energy Center, LLC 55177 0.4128
Spring Canyon 56320 0.0000
Spring Valley Wind Project 57192 0.0000
Springerville Generating Station 8223 1.0275
Star Point 57096 0.0000
Steamboat Hills Geothermal 50654 0.0369
Steamboat II 54665 0.0000
Steamboat III 54666 0.0000
Stillwater Wind 61858 0.0000
Sumas Power Plant 54476 0.4497
Sun Peak Generating Station 54854 0.7069
Sundance 55522 0.6087
Swift 1 3850 0.0000
Terra-Gen Dixie Valley 52015 0.0649
Thermo No. 1 Geothermal (Raser Technologies) 57353 0.0000 Thompson Falls Dam 2195 0.0000
Tieton Dam Hydro Electric Project 57496 0.0000
Top of the World 57327 0.0000
Transalta Centralia Generation 3845 1.1179
Version: May 2022
TS Power Plant 56224 1.0322
Tucannon River Wind Farm 58571 0.0000
Tungsten Mountain Geothermal Energy Facility 60785 0.0000 Turquoise Liberty Solar - Phase 1 62980 0.0000
Twin Buttes 56460 0.0000
Upper Baker 3861 0.0000
Upper Falls Hydro 9096 0.0000
Vansycle II Wind Energy Center 58324 0.0000
Vantage Wind 57188 0.0000
Veyo Heat Recovery Project 60421 0.0000
Voyager Wind II 61582 0.0000
West Phoenix 117 0.4778
West Valley Generation Project 55622 0.5762
White Creek Wind Farm 56487 0.0000
Whitehorn Generating Station 6120 0.8689
Wild Horse Wind 56322 0.0000
Willow Creek Wind 56952 0.0000
Windy Flats Wind Project 57159 0.0000
Windy Point/Flats Project phase 1 (Tuolumne
Wind Project) 56702 0.0000
Wolverine Creek 56301 0.0000
Wy'East Solar 61345 0.0000
Yale 3852 0.0000
Yucca 120 0.6852
Yuma Cogeneration Associates 54694 0.4865
Ameresco Chiquita Energy LLC 56898 0.0040
Ameresco Forward LLC 58437 0.0026
Ameresco Half Moon Bay 56895 0.0027
Ameresco Keller Canyon 56897 0.0027
Ameresco San Joaquin LLC 58436 0.0027
Ameresco Santa Cruz 56428 0.0034
Ameresco Vasco Road 58435 0.0027
Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass, LLC, 93610 56706 0.0305
Bowerman Power LFG, LLC 59461 0.0029
Brea Generation, LLC 10648 1.1111
Burney Forest Products 10652 0.0739
City of San Diego, Public Utilities Dept, North
City Water Reclamation Plant 60571 0.0066
City of San Diego, Public Utilities Dept, North
City Water Reclamation Plant 55602 0.0066
City of San Diego, Public Utilities Dept, Point
Loma Treatment Plant 50492 0.0064
DG Fairhaven Power LLC 10052 0.2388
Version: May 2022
DTE Stockton, LLC 54238 0.0229
East Bay Municipal Utility District 56036 0.0117
East Bay Municipal Utility District 57696 0.0117
G2 Energy Ostrom Road, LLC 57133 0.5742
HL Power Company 10777 0.0329
Humboldt Sawmill Company 50049 0.0067
Kiefer Landfill, Department of Waste
Management and Recycling 55766 0.0056
LACSD - Calabasas LF 57163 0.0042
LACSD - Joint Water Pollution Control Plant 10091 0.0600 LACSD - Puente Hills Landfill 10472 0.0031
Merced Power, LLC, 95340 56707 0.0303
Miramar - MM and Miramar Energy 55094 0.0037
MM Lopez Energy LLC 55161 0.0293
MM Prima Deshecha Energy LLC 55601 0.0027
MM Tajiguas Energy LLC 55603 0.0030
MM West Covina LLC 54015 0.0068
MM Yolo Power LLC 54567 0.0033
Monterey Regional Waste Management District 10748 0.0025 Mt. Poso Cogeneration Company 54626 0.0345
NOVE Power Plant 50831 0.6713
Orange County Sanitation District - Plant 2 52099 0.1035 Pacific Ultrapower Chinese 50560 0.0286
Potrero Hills Energy Producers, LLC 59952 0.0027
Rio Bravo Fresno 10767 0.0440
Rio Bravo Rocklin 10772 0.0520
Roseburg Forest Products 56469 0.0118
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) ,
Cosumnes Power Plant 55970 0.3617
San Francisco Southeast Treatment Plant 57971 0.0655
San Marcos Energy LLC 10386 0.0038
Santa Cruz Energy LLC 57876 0.0030
Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) - Anderson, 96007 59658 0.0083 Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) - Burney 50110 0.0088
Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) - Lincoln 10144 0.0108
Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) - Quincy Division 50112 0.0533 Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) - Sonora 54517 0.0730
Sonoma County Landfill Gas to Energy 55752 0.0034
Sonoma County Landfill Gas to Energy 55753 0.0034
Sonoma County Landfill Gas to Energy 55880 0.0034
Version: May 2022
Sunshine Gas Producers, LLC 58429 0.0033
Sycamore Energy LLC 10387 0.0051
Wadham Energy Ltd Partnership 50293 0.0205
Waste Management - Altamont Landfill 50571 1.0032
Waste Management - Redwood Landfill, Inc. 59299 0.0029
Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company 50881 0.0274
Woodland Biomass Power, LLC 10836 0.0315
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 57573 1.2664
Covanta - Stanislaus, Inc 50632 1.8612
Encina Water Pollution Control Facility 10026 0.2735
Energy 2001, Placer WRSL 57988 0.0067
John L. Featherstone Plant (Hudson Ranch) 57475 0.0558
Kern Oil Refinery 58100 3.942
Orange County Sanitation District - Plant 1 50696 0.088 Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) ,
Carson Ice CG 7527 0.5218
San Jose/Santa Clara Regional Wastewater
Facility 56080 0.4683
Southeast Resource Recovery Facility (SERRF) 50837 2.0677 85 A 52162 0.0000
85 B 52163 0.0000
Sunshine Valley Solar 59826 0.0000
Windhub Solar A LLC 59878 0.0000
Ponderosa Bailey Creek 10709 0.0000
CA Flats Solar 130, LLC 60033 0.0000
Blackwell Solar Park 59524 0.0000
Montgomery Creek Hydro 55009 0.0000
Ameresco Johnson Canyon 58397 0.5615
Spicer Meadow Project 54554 0.0000
Kettleman Solar -Centaurus 59633 0.0000
Elevation Solar C 59964 0.0000
Frontier Solar LLC 60039 0.0000
Hayworth Solar 59009 0.0000
Western Antelope Blue Sky B 59961 0.0000
Shiloh I Wind Project 56362 0.0000
Midway Solar Farm 1 60336 0.0000
Blythe Solar 110, LLC 60093 0.0000
Calpine - Geysers Unit 5-20 286 0.0374
Calpine - Aidlin Geothermal Power Plant 52158 0.0374
Calpine - Sonoma California Geothermal 510 0.0374
Calpine - Calistoga Power Plant 50066 0.0374
Version: May 2022
Dutch Flat 2 413 0.0000
Bowman 50546 0.0000
Atwell Island 58366 0.0000
Avenal Park 57359 0.0000
California Valley Solar Ranch 57439 0.0000
White River Solar 58373 0.0000
Henrietta Solar Project 58975 0.0000
Mojave Solar Project 57331 0.0000
North Star Solar 58713 0.0000
Sand Drag LLC 57361 0.0000
Alpaugh 50 58003 0.0000
Alpaugh North 58002 0.0000
Sun City Project LLC 57360 0.0000
Topaz Solar Farm 57695 0.0000
Hatchet Ridge Wind Project 56654 0.0000
Shiloh IV Wind Project LLC 57725 0.0000
Shiloh Wind Project 2 LLC 56874 0.0000
San Gorgonio Windplant WPP1993 54454 0.0000
Alamo Solar 59469 0.0000
Bayshore Solar C, LLC 60475 0.0000
GPS Cabazon Wind LLC 50552 0.0000
Camanche 537 0.0000
Golden Hills Wind 60049 0.0000
Pardee 376 0.0000
RE Tranquillity 59939 0.0000
Ridgetop 54931 0.0000
Algonquin SKIC20 Solar LLC 59412 0.0000
CED Avenal 60077 0.0000
White River Solar 2 58973 0.0000
Westlands Solar PV Farm 58616 0.0000
Morelos del Sol 60007 0.0000
Murphys 261 0.0000
RE Old River One, LLC 58986 0.0000
Orion Solar I 58718 0.0000
RE Astoria 2 59977 0.0000
Rising Tree Wind Farm 57621 0.0000
Shafter Solar LLC 59408 0.0000
Woodmere Solar Farm 59008 0.0000
Solar Star California, XLI, LLC 60591 0.0000
Shaffer 59396 0.0000
Findlay Wind Farm 60015 0.0000
Cape Cod Air Force Station - 6 SWS 58661 0.0000
AV Solar Ranch One 57378 0.0000
Cabazon Wind Partners 56011 0.0000
Cameron Ridge LLC 10586 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Campo Verde Solar 58467 0.0000
Cottonwood Solar, LLC (City of Corcoran) 59087 0.0000
CM48 57205 0.0000
Little Bay 60495 0.0000
O'Neill Creek Solar 63235 0.0000
Venable Solar 1 58289 0.0000
Washington White Post Solar LLC 58135 0.0000
Bluegrass Ridge 56555 0.0000
Heartland Community College 59776 0.0000
Pilgrim Stage Wind Park 56440 0.0000
North Gooding Main Hydro 61688 0.0000
Westside Solar Station 57499 0.0000
Normanskill Hydro Project 50123 0.0000
Echo Wind Park 58121 0.0000
Cummins, Inc 60453 0.0000
Ball Mountain Hydro 59040 0.0000
Gunsight Mountain Wind Energy LLC 56776 0.0000
Alpine Solar 57295 0.0000
Bridgewater 2719 0.0000
Richland Solar Center 59874 0.0000
Golden Hills North Wind Energy Center 61222 0.0000
Giffen Solar Park 59522 0.0000
Five Points Solar Park 59523 0.0000
Ameresco Butte County 57771 0.5743
Nimbus 444 0.0000
Lewiston 977 0.0000
Stampede 7066 0.0000
Graeagle 3247 0.0000
Tulloch 416 0.0000
Judge F Carr 442 0.0000
Folsom 441 0.0000
Keswick 443 0.0000
New Melones 6158 0.0000
Shasta 445 0.0000
Spring Creek 450 0.0000
Trinity 451 0.0000
ONeill 446 0.0000
Alameda 7450 0.8998
Lodi 7451 0.8706
Brea Expansion Plant 58007 0.0029
Second Imperial Geothermal 54111 0.0756
Perris 481 0.0000
Valley View 487 0.0000
Anaheim Solar Energy Plant 59416 0.0000
Westside Solar Power PV1 60275 0.0000
Version: May 2022
San Gorgonio Farms Wind Farm 50281 0.0000
Garnet Wind Energy Center 57302 0.0000
San Dimas Wash Generating Station 50233 0.0000
RE Columbia Two, LLC 58990 0.0000
Summer Solar LLC 60280 0.0000
Antelope Big Sky Ranch 60279 0.0000
Kingbird B Solar, LLC 60091 0.0000
Antelope DSR 2 60187 0.0000
Hoover Dam (AZ) 8902 0.0000
Shoreham 2518 1.4334
TA-Acacia, LLC 59443 0.0000
Bayshore Solar A, LLC 60481 0.0000
Bayshore Solar B, LLC 60474 0.0000
Coram Tehachapi 54750 0.0000
Desert Sunlight 300, LLC 57993 0.0000
Genesis Solar Energy Project 57394 0.0000
North Sky River Energy LLC 58154 0.0000
Portal Ridge Solar C, LLC 60311 0.0000
Western Antelope Blue Sky Ranch A 58626 0.0000
CA Flats Solar 150, LLC 60034 0.0000
Cuyama Solar, LLC 60043 0.0000
Gates Solar Station 57892 0.0000
Huron Solar Station 57523 0.0000
Lost Hills/Blackwell 58711 0.0000
RE Astoria 59976 0.0000
Rising Tree Wind Farm II 59235 0.0000
Shiloh III Wind Project LLC 57586 0.0000
West Gates Solar Station 58206 0.0000
Centinela Solar Energy 58430 0.0000
Imperial Solar Energy Center South 57490 0.0000
Mountain View III 56112 0.0000
CalRenew-1 56768 0.0000
Cantua Solar Station 57522 0.0000
Diablo Winds LLC 56271 0.0000
Five Points Solar Station 57498 0.0000
FPL Energy Montezuma Winds LLC 57201 0.0000
Guernsey Solar Station 57891 0.0000
Montezuma Wind II 57701 0.0000
Stroud Solar Station 57497 0.0000
Vaca Dixon Solar Station 57041 0.0000
Etiwanda 745 0.0000
Mammoth G1 10480 0.0756
Sunray 2 10437 0.0000
Tehachapi Wind Resource I 10191 0.0000
Tehachapi Wind Resource II 54909 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Imperial Solar Energy Center West 57491 0.0000
Solar Borrego I 57455 0.0000
Ocotillo Express LLC 57514 0.0000
Willow Spring Solar, LLC 60324 0.0000
Voyager Wind IV 61584 0.0000
San Pablo Raceway 62004 0.0000
Alta Wind Energy Center I 57282 0.0000
Alta Wind Energy Center II 57291 0.0000
Difwind Farms Ltd V 54685 0.0000
Voyager Wind I 60594 0.0000
Terra-Gen 251 Wind LLC 52161 0.0000
Oak Creek Energy Systems I 50754 0.0000
Painted Hills Wind Park 50533 0.0000
Ridgetop Energy LLC 10597 0.0000
RE Rosamond One LLC 58498 0.0000
Mojave 5 52144 0.0000
Victory Garden (Tehachapi) 50532 0.0000
Whitewater Hill Wind Partners 56012 0.0000
Windpark Unlimited 1 10027 0.0000
Windpark Unlimited 2 60321 0.0000
CTV Power Purchase Contract Trust 54300 0.0000
Desert Wind Farm, LLC 59968 0.0000
Dion R Holm 380 0.0000
Moccasin 381 0.0000
Bonneville 3075 0.0000
Sunset Reservoir North Basin 57559 0.0000
Colton Solar One, LLC 59597 0.0000
Colton Solar Two, LLC 59598 0.0000
Davis Dam 152 0.0000
Mammoth G2 10481 0.0756
Rock Creek 275 0.0000
A G Wishon 293 0.0000
Alta Powerhouse 214 0.0000
Big Creek Water Works 10282 0.0000
Chili Bar 225 0.0000
Coleman PH 227 0.0000
Cow Creek 229 0.0000
De Sabla 232 0.0000
Deer Creek PH 233 0.0000
Dutch Flat 237 0.0000
El Dorado 238 0.0000
Halsey 241 0.0000
Hat Creek 2 244 0.0000
Kelly Ridge 418 0.0000
Kilarc 253 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Newcastle 632 0.0000
Oak Flat 626 0.0000
Phoenix 264 0.0000
Potter Valley 274 0.0000
Rollins 34 0.0000
San Joaquin No. 1 278 0.0000
Sly Creek 776 0.0000
South 280 0.0000
Spaulding 1 281 0.0000
Spring Gap 284 0.0000
Three Forks Water Power Project 54308 0.0000
Toadtown 714 0.0000
Volta 1 290 0.0000
Volta 2 180 0.0000
West Point PH 291 0.0000
Wise 292 0.0000
Oro Loma 59915 0.0000
Imperial Valley Solar, LLC 56917 0.0000
Silver State Solar Power South 58644 0.0000
Desert Sunlight 250, LLC 58542 0.0000
Aspiration G 59737 0.0000
Lost Hills Solar LLC 58712 0.0000
San Joaquin Solar 60678 0.0000
Alta Wind X 58394 0.0000
Alta Wind XI 58395 0.0000
Rising Tree Wind Farm III 59236 0.0000
Box Canyon Dam 50179 0.0000
Alta Wind Energy Center III 57292 0.0000
Alta Wind Energy Center IV 57293 0.0000
Alta Wind Energy Center V 57294 0.0000
Vasco Winds 57700 0.0000
Mustang Hills LLC 57833 0.0000
Alta Wind VIII 57835 0.0000
Giffen 57521 0.0000
Windstar 1 57774 0.0000
Pinyon Pine II 57837 0.0000
Pinyon Pine I 57834 0.0000
RE Kansas South LLC 58148 0.0000
Corcoran Solar 58374 0.0000
Cottage Street Solar Facility 58568 0.0000
Solar Star 1 58388 0.0000
Solar Star 2 58389 0.0000
RE Kansas Solar, LLC 58985 0.0000
RE Kent South, LLC 58991 0.0000
CID Solar, LLC 59183 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Regulus Solar Project 57650 0.0000
Bakersfield PV 1 61117 0.0000
Quinto Solar PV Project 59339 0.0000
Stateline Solar 58646 0.0000
Whitney Point Solar 60975 0.0000
W R Gianelli 448 0.0000
Tacoma 6206 0.0000
Drop 1 585 0.0000
Drop 2 (CA) 385 0.0000
Drop 3 (CA) 386 0.0000
Drop 4 387 0.0000
Drop 5 314 0.0000
East Highline 586 0.0000
Pilot Knob 388 0.0000
Imperial Valley Solar Company 1 LLC 58062 0.0000
Heber Solar 58398 0.0000
Duke Building 98 59433 0.0000
Coachella 6060 0.8899
Rockwood 7824 0.9121
Western Antelope Dry Ranch 58627 0.0000
Big Pine Creek 391 0.0000
Control Gorge 393 0.0000
Cottonwood 394 0.0000
Foothill 396 0.0000
Franklin (CA) 397 0.0000
Middle Gorge 401 0.0000
Pleasant Valley Hydro 402 0.0000
San Fernando 403 0.0000
San Francisquito 1 6479 0.0000
San Francisquito 2 6480 0.0000
Sepulveda Canyon 316 0.0000
Upper Gorge 407 0.0000
McGinness Hills 3 61912 0.0756
Ormesa Geothermal 50762 0.0756
Hecate Energy Beacon Solar 1 59315 0.0000
Beacon Solar Plant Site 2 59309 0.0000
Hecate Energy Beacon Solar 3 59316 0.0000
Hecate Energy Beacon Solar 4 59317 0.0000
Beacon Solar Plant Site 5 59308 0.0000
Owens Valley Solar Project 11 60953 0.0000
Munro Valley Solar 60412 0.0000
Port of LA Solar FiT Project 61319 0.0000
Xebec 1 62286 0.0000
USPS PV 61250 0.0000
CFW Solar X LLC - Vaughn 62378 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Westmont 301 61593 0.0000
Westmont 401 61594 0.0000
RE Barren Ridge 1 60389 0.0000
Springbok Solar Farm 1 59532 0.0000
Springbok Solar Farm 2 59840 0.0000
Adelanto Solar Project 57305 0.0000
Pine Tree Solar Project 57306 0.0000
Manzana Wind LLC 57484 0.0000
Pine Tree Wind Power Project 56433 0.0000
Castaic 392 0.0000
Cottonwood Solar, LLC (Goose Lake) 59086 0.0000
Marin Clean Energy Solar One 61013 0.0000
RE Mustang LLC 59150 0.0000
Mustang Two 62015 0.0000
Voyager Wind III 61583 0.0000
Antelope Expansion 2 61264 0.0000
Blythe Solar II, LLC 60092 0.0000
Wistaria Ranch Solar 61750 0.0000
Green Power I 55396 0.0000
G2 Energy Hay Rd 58320 0.5420
Great Valley Solar Portfolio Holdings, LLC 59940 0.0000 Hat Creek 1 243 0.0000
Parker 428 0.0000
North Rosamond Solar LLC 59879 0.0000
Panoche Valley Solar Farm 57340 0.0000
RE Garland 60233 0.0000
Frankenheimer Power Plant 50219 0.0000
Woodward Power Plant 50218 0.0000
Spaulding 2 282 0.0000
Spaulding 3 283 0.0000
Tule Wind LLC 57913 0.0000
Terra-Gen VG Wind LLC 56570 0.0000
New Hogan Power Plant 50755 0.0000
Axium Modesto Solar 58039 0.0000
Stone Drop 499 0.0000
Don Pedro 439 0.0000
McClure 151 1.2384
Klondike Wind Power 55871 0.0000
Mesa Wind Power Corp 50535 0.0000
Balch 2 218 0.0000
Belden 219 0.0000
James B Black 249 0.0000
Caribou 2 223 0.0000
Cresta 231 0.0000
Haas 240 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Kerckhoff 2 682 0.0000
Pit 3 266 0.0000
Pit 4 267 0.0000
Pit 5 268 0.0000
Poe 272 0.0000
Stanislaus 285 0.0000
Coram Energy LLC 54299 0.0000
Rancho Penasquitos 56615 0.0000
TPC Windfarms LLC 54647 0.0000
Hamilton Branch 242 0.0000
Lime Saddle 255 0.0000
San Joaquin 2 276 0.0000
Monticello Dam 7646 0.0000
Haypress 10253 0.0000
Forks of Butte Hydro Project 50350 0.0000
Muck Valley Hydroelectric 10458 0.0000
Monterey One Water 54951 0.1170
Rio Bravo Hydro Project 50037 0.0000
Olsen 50180 0.0000
Burney Creek 10706 0.0000
Cove Hydroelectric 10707 0.0000
Deadwood Creek 7507 0.0000
ABEC #2 dba West-Star Dairy 61501 0.8245
ABEC #3 dba Lakeview Dairy 61502 0.7060
ABEC #4 dba CE&S Dairy 61503 0.7448
Baker Creek Hydroelectric 59428 0.0000
Bakersfield 111 59948 0.0000
Bear Creek Solar 58508 0.0000
Cloverdale Solar I 58949 0.0000
Hollister Solar LLC 59268 0.0000
Merced Solar LLC 59265 0.0000
Mission Solar LLC 59267 0.0000
Enerparc CA1 LLC 59122 0.0000
Enerparc CA2, LLC 59978 0.0000
Sonora 1 58578 0.0000
CSU Fresno Solar Project 56813 0.0000
Castor Solar 60277 0.0000
Shasta Solar Farm 58814 0.0000
Kettleman Solar Project 58510 0.0000
Kingsburg Solar 58304 0.0000
La Joya Del Sol 58118 0.0000
Lemoore 1 60142 0.0000
Lost Creek I 10708 0.0000
Madera 1 PV 61421 0.0000
Gosselin Hydro Plant 10128 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Sun Harvest Solar NDP1 59687 0.0000
Nickel 1 Solar Facility 58034 0.0000
Combie South 846 0.0000
Scott Flat 839 0.0000
Oakley Solar Project 58376 0.0000
2127 Harris Solar Project 58919 0.0000
2097 Helton Solar Project 58920 0.0000
2081 Terzian Solar Project 58918 0.0000
Putah Creek Solar Farm 59550 0.0000
Site 980 65 50322 0.0000
Cold Canyon 1 58379 1.1339
Vintner Solar 58509 0.0000
Grassland 3&4 Solar Project 58204 0.0000
Zero Waste Energy Development Co LLC 60220 0.3189
Nelson Creek 50223 0.0000
Verwey-Hanford Dairy Digester #2 62418 0.6449
Verwey-Hanford Dairy Digester #3 62419 0.6943
Bakersfield Industrial PV 1 61118 0.0000
Delano Land 1 61116 0.0000
Manteca Land PV 61115 0.0000
Merced 1 PV 61420 0.0000
Redwood 4 Solar Farm 60490 0.0000
ABEC Bidart-Old River LLC 58699 0.7685
Corcoran Solar 3 59900 0.0000
Columbia Solar Energy, LLC 59979 0.0000
Brookfield Tehachapi 1 57962 0.0000
Eagle Creek 63078 0.0000
Kekawaka Power House 54654 0.0000
NextEra Westside PV 60981 0.0000
Diablo Canyon 6099 0.0000
Balch 1 217 0.0000
Bucks Creek 220 0.0000
Butt Valley 221 0.0000
Caribou 1 222 0.0000
Drum 1 235 0.0000
Drum 2 236 0.0000
Electra 239 0.0000
Kings River PH 254 0.0000
Pit 1 265 0.0000
Pit 6 269 0.0000
Pit 7 270 0.0000
Salt Springs 279 0.0000
Tiger Creek 287 0.0000
Forbestown 417 0.0000
Chicago Park 412 0.0000
Version: May 2022
CSU East Bay 57042 0.3419
SF State University 57043 0.3020
South Belridge Cogeneration Facility 50752 0.3150
Coalinga Cogeneration Facility 50750 0.2496
Oroville Cogeneration LP 54477 0.2698
Adams Solar Center 61496 0.0000
Ashton 825 0.0000
Bear Creek Solar Center 61281 0.0000
Bend 6484 0.0000
Big Fork 6459 0.0000
Blundell 299 0.0756
Bly Solar Center 62272 0.0000
Clearwater 1 3020 0.0000
Clearwater 2 3021 0.0000
Copco 1 294 0.0000
Copco 2 295 0.0000
Cutler Hydro 3646 0.0000
Eagle Point 3024 0.0000
Elbe Solar Center 61497 0.0000
Enterprise Solar, LLC 59386 0.0000
Fall Creek 296 0.0000
Fish Creek 3026 0.0000
Foote Creek I 55607 0.0000
Foote Creek II 55608 0.0000
Foote Creek III 55609 0.0000
Granite 3651 0.0000
Gunlock 7069 0.0000
Iron Gate 297 0.0000
Last Chance 987 0.0000
Latigo Wind Park 59965 0.0000
Mountain Wind Power II LLC 56753 0.0000
Mountain Wind Power LLC 56752 0.0000
Oneida 829 0.0000
Paris 830 0.0000
Pavant Solar II LLC 60449 0.0000
Pavant Solar, LLC 59702 0.0000
Pioneer 3656 0.0000
Pioneer Wind Park, LLC 60259 0.0000
Prospect 1 3032 0.0000
Prospect 3 3034 0.0000
Prospect 4 3035 0.0000
Rock River I LLC 55740 0.0000
Sand Cove 3636 0.0000
Slide Creek 3036 0.0000
Soda 831 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Soda Springs 3037 0.0000
Stairs 3659 0.0000
Sweetwater Solar 61369 0.0000
Viva Naughton 7050 0.0000
Wallowa Falls 3041 0.0000
Weber 3661 0.0000
BYUI Central Energy Facility 59496 0.2361
Shute Creek Facility 56312 0.4130
Gadsby 3648 0.9285
Grace 827 0.0000
Hayden 525 1.0297
John C Boyle 3028 0.0000
Lemolo 1 3029 0.0000
Lemolo 2 6421 0.0000
Prospect 2 3033 0.0000
Sunnyside Cogen Associates 50951 1.4072
General Chemical 54318 0.4041
Tesoro SLC Cogeneration Plant 56509 0.6077
Toketee Falls 3040 0.0000
Wyodak 6101 1.2097
City of Palo Alto 57714 0.3973
Buena Vista Energy LLC 56446 0.0000
Solar Gen 2 Solar Facility 58592 0.0000
Colgreen North Shore Solar Farm 60825 0.0000
Dinosaur Point 10005 0.0000
Karen Avenue Wind Farm 10718 0.0000
Kumeyaay Wind 56295 0.0000
Bidwell Ditch Project 10880 0.0000
Hatchet Creek Project 10882 0.0000
Roaring Creek Water Power 10881 0.0000
Ramona Solar Energy 60995 0.0000
Seville 1 59722 0.0000
Difwind Farms Ltd I 54681 0.0000
Difwind Farms Ltd II 54682 0.0000
Altech III 50485 0.0000
San Gorgonio Westwinds II LLC 50690 0.0000
French Meadows 424 0.0000
Hell Hole Powerhouse 763 0.0000
Oxbow (CA) 426 0.0000
Warm Springs Hydro Project 54261 0.0000
Boulder Canyon Hydro 466 0.0000
Whiskeytown 7189 0.0000
AP North Lake I, LP 59610 0.0000
Tequesquite Landfill Solar PV Project 60035 0.0000
Antelope DSR 1 60186 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Wintec Energy Ltd 50276 0.0000
Wagner Wind LLC 58233 0.0000
Springs Generating Station 56144 0.7446
Sand Bar Power Plant 50400 0.0000
Roseville Power Plant #2 7452 0.8845
Robbs Peak 433 0.0000
Camp Far West 531 0.0000
Jones Fork 534 0.0000
SMUD at Van Conett 57670 0.0000
SMUD at Fleshman 57671 0.0000
SMUD at Lawrence 57753 0.0000
RE Dillard 1 LLC 57777 0.0000
RE Dillard 2 LLC 57779 0.0000
RE Dillard 3 LLC 57781 0.0000
Dillard 4 LLC 57806 0.0000
RE Kammerer 1 LLC 57778 0.0000
RE Bruceville 1 LLC 57783 0.0000
RE Kammerer 2 LLC 57780 0.0000
RE Kammerer 3 LLC 57782 0.0000
RE Bruceville 2 LLC 57784 0.0000
RE Bruceville 3 LLC 57785 0.0000
Green Acres Solar Facility 1 57849 0.0000
Green Acres Solar Facility 2 57850 0.0000
RE McKenzie 1 LLC 57816 0.0000
RE McKenzie 2 LLC 57817 0.0000
RE McKenzie 3 LLC 57818 0.0000
RE McKenzie 4 LLC 57819 0.0000
RE McKenzie 5 LLC 57820 0.0000
RE McKenzie 6 LLC 57821 0.0000
Sacramento Soleil LLC 56875 0.0000
Rancho Seco Solar 529 0.0000
Solano Wind 7526 0.0000
Camino 430 0.0000
Jaybird 431 0.0000
Loon Lake 432 0.0000
Union Valley 6612 0.0000
White Rock/Slab Creek 435 0.0000
McClellan (CA) 535 0.6689
Rancho Seco Solar, LLC 60226 0.0000
SMUD at Grundman 57669 0.0000
Calipatria Solar Farm 59088 0.0000
Cascade Solar 58590 0.0000
Desert Green Solar Farm LLC 57959 0.0000
Maricopa West Solar PV, LLC 59607 0.0000
Ramona 1 58909 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Ramona 2 58911 0.0000
Valley Center 1 58906 0.0000
Valley Center 2 58907 0.0000
Midway Solar Farm III 60315 0.0000
Bear Valley 457 0.0000
Catalina Solar LLC 57708 0.0000
Granger 60516 0.0000
Valley Center 60509 0.0000
Coram Energy LLC (ECT) 54298 0.0000
Oasis Wind 56302 0.0000
Pacific Wind LLC 57757 0.0000
Carlsbad Energy Center 59002 0.6014
Lake Hodges Hydroelectric Facility 57729 0.0000
R C Kirkwood 382 0.0000
John H Kerr 3833 0.0000
Crane Valley Powerhouse 230 0.0000
Coronal Lost Hills 59638 0.0000
Victory Garden Phase IV LLC 52160 0.0000
Exchequer 409 0.0000
Gianera 7231 0.8126
RE Rosamond Two LLC 58499 0.0000
Mount Signal Solar Farm II 61353 0.0000
MEBA 60496 0.0000
Gopher Creek Wind Farm 61417 0.0000
Valencia 1 Solar CA 61418 0.0000
MM Tulare Energy 55160 0.9953
Isabella Hydro Project 10139 0.0000
Terminus Hydroelectric Project 54343 0.0000
Santa Felicia Dam 50076 0.0000
Tulare Success Power Project 10222 0.0000
East Portal Generator 50375 0.0000
Bear Creek 50156 0.0000
Whitewater Hydro Plant 10162 0.0000
Springville Hydroelectric 56125 0.0000
Bishop Creek 2 323 0.0000
Bishop Creek 3 324 0.0000
Bishop Creek 4 325 0.0000
Bishop Creek 5 326 0.0000
Bishop Creek 6 327 0.0000
Borel 328 0.0000
Fontana 332 0.0000
Kaweah 1 337 0.0000
Kaweah 2 336 0.0000
Kaweah 3 338 0.0000
Kern River 1 340 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Lundy 342 0.0000
Mill Creek 3 7147 0.0000
Poole 353 0.0000
Portal 354 0.0000
Rush Creek 357 0.0000
Santa Ana 1 361 0.0000
Santa Ana 3 363 0.0000
Lower Tule River 365 0.0000
Green Beanworks B PV 61339 0.0000
Solar Blythe LLC 56939 0.0000
RE Rio Grande Solar LLC 58500 0.0000
Gaskell West 1 Solar Facility 61445 0.0000
RE Victor Phelan Solar One LLC 58202 0.0000
TA-High Desert LLC 58149 0.0000
Green Beanworks C PV 61215 0.0000
Green Beanworks D PV 61216 0.0000
Temescal Canyon RV, LLC 57656 0.0000
Corcoran Solar 2 59413 0.0000
Adobe Solar 57651 0.0000
Golden Springs Building C-1 57796 0.0000
Golden Springs Building D 57797 0.0000
Industry MetroLink PV 1 57860 0.0000
San Antonio West Solar Rooftop 57904 0.0000
SEPV 1 58073 0.0000
SEPV 2 58074 0.0000
Sunray 3 10438 0.0000
North Palm Springs 1A 57743 0.0000
North Palm Springs 4A 57722 0.0000
Powhatan Solar Power Generation Station 1
LLC 58611 0.0000
Otoe Solar Power Generation Station 1 LLC 58612 0.0000
Navajo Solar Power Generation Station 1 LLC 58610 0.0000 Lancaster Dry Farm Ranch B 58750 0.0000
Victor Dry Farm Ranch A 58418 0.0000
Victor Dry Farm Ranch B 58419 0.0000
Sierra Solar Greenworks 59431 0.0000
Coronus Adelanto West 1 59536 0.0000
Coronus Adelanto West 2 59537 0.0000
Garnet Solar Generation Station I LLC 58528 0.0000
RE Columbia 3 LLC 58502 0.0000
McCoy Solar Energy Project Hybrid 58462 0.0000
Industry Solar Power Generation Station 1 LLC 58609 0.0000 Version: May 2022
Newberry Solar 1 LLC 58226 0.0000
Little Rock Pham Solar 60026 0.0000
L-8 Solar Project 57836 0.0000
Heliocentric 57831 0.0000
One Ten Partners PV 61419 0.0000
Arrache 4006 58445 0.0000
Arrache 4013 58446 0.0000
Arrache 8083 58447 0.0000
Horn 58452 0.0000
Ma 58451 0.0000
Nunn 58448 0.0000
Rutan 58449 0.0000
Vinam 58450 0.0000
Watts 3115 58454 0.0000
Radiance Solar 5 58355 0.0000
Radiance Solar 4 58354 0.0000
SEPV 8 58234 0.0000
SEPV9 Power Plant 58227 0.0000
Summer Solar C2 58755 0.0000
Summer Solar D2 58756 0.0000
Summer Solar A2 58753 0.0000
Summer Solar B2 58754 0.0000
Rodeo Solar C2 58751 0.0000
Rodeo Solar D2 58752 0.0000
Expressway Solar C2 58763 0.0000
Exeter Solar 58306 0.0000
Lindsay Solar 58308 0.0000
Ivanhoe Solar 58307 0.0000
Porterville Solar 58309 0.0000
Tulare 1 and 2 58642 0.0000
Kettering Solar 1 59098 0.0000
Kettering Solar 2 59099 0.0000
Division 1 59094 0.0000
Division 2 59095 0.0000
Division 3 59096 0.0000
Diamond Valley Solar Project 59405 0.0000
Farmersville 59203 0.0000
Lone Valley Solar Park I LLC 58417 0.0000
Lone Valley Solar Park II LLC 59237 0.0000
US-TOPCO (Soccer Center) 60086 0.0000
Orion Solar II 58721 0.0000
Vega Solar 59555 0.0000
RE Adams East, LLC 58984 0.0000
Porterville 6 and 7 59219 0.0000
Hesperia 59182 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Oltmans SCE at Champagne 58581 0.0000
Oltmans SCE at Jurupa 58582 0.0000
SCE-Snowline-Duncan Road (North) 59359 0.0000
SCE-Snowline-Duncan Road (South) 59360 0.0000
Victor Mesa Linda B2 59269 0.0000
Victor Mesa Linda C2 59270 0.0000
Victor Mesa Linda D2 59271 0.0000
Victor Mesa Linda E2 59272 0.0000
Hanford 1 and 2 59300 0.0000
Desert Hot Springs Solar 58514 0.0000
SCE-Snowline-White Road (North) 59422 0.0000
SCE-Snowline-White Rd (Central) 59423 0.0000
Mitchell Solar, LLC 59411 0.0000
Rudy Solar, LLC 59410 0.0000
Madelyn Solar, LLC 59409 0.0000
SCE-Snowline-White Road (South) 59421 0.0000
Venable Solar 2 58290 0.0000
Lancaster Solar 1 59167 0.0000
Lancaster Solar 2 59169 0.0000
Morgan Lancaster 1 59942 0.0000
PVN Milliken, LLC 60790 0.0000
SEPV Palmdale East 59273 0.0000
Lancaster WAD B 59739 0.0000
Pumpjack Solar I 59322 0.0000
Catalina Solar 2, LLC 59334 0.0000
Citizen B 59738 0.0000
Wildwood Solar I, LLC 59380 0.0000
Adelanto Solar, LLC 59441 0.0000
Redcrest Solar Farm 58831 0.0000
Central Antelope Dry Ranch B LLC 60281 0.0000
Lancaster Little Rock 59262 0.0000
Solar Oasis LLC 59528 0.0000
Atwell Island West Solar 59414 0.0000
Adera Solar 60027 0.0000
Rancho Cucamonga Dist #1 59540 0.0000
Terra Francesco 59541 0.0000
Park Meridian #1 59539 0.0000
Santa Fe Springs Rooftop Solar BLDG H 58913 0.0000
Santa Fe Springs Rooftop Solar BLDG M 58912 0.0000
Adelanto Solar II, LLC 59440 0.0000
Central Antelope Dry Ranch C 59963 0.0000
North Lancaster Ranch 59962 0.0000
Summer North Solar 58757 0.0000
Nicolis Solar PV Plant 59600 0.0000
Tropico Solar PV Plant 59599 0.0000
Version: May 2022
SEPV 18 59730 0.0000
SEPV Mojave West 59740 0.0000
SunE Rochester 60032 0.0000
SunE- E Philadelphia Ontario 59916 0.0000
Longboat Solar, LLC 60485 0.0000
Algonquin SKIC 10 Solar, LLC 60242 0.0000
Portal Ridge Solar B, LLC 60310 0.0000
Rio Bravo Solar 1 LLC 59249 0.0000
Rio Bravo Solar II LLC 59250 0.0000
Wildwood Solar II 59253 0.0000
Jacumba Solar Farm 60947 0.0000
RE Garland A 60386 0.0000
CED Ducor 1 60078 0.0000
CED Ducor 2 60079 0.0000
CED Ducor 4 60081 0.0000
CED Ducor 3 60080 0.0000
Building F 60151 0.0000
Building G 60153 0.0000
Buidling L 60154 0.0000
Freeway Springs 60183 0.0000
Dulles 60182 0.0000
Antelope DSR 3 61265 0.0000
Lancaster 62056 0.0000
Valentine Solar, LLC 62288 0.0000
CalCity Solar 1 63054 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #02 56996 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #10 57224 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #15 57229 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #17 57231 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #18 57232 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #23 57236 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #26 57245 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #27 57246 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #12 57226 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #32 57534 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #33 57535 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #06 57220 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #08 57222 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #09 57223 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #11 57225 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #13 57227 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #16 57230 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #22 57237 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #05 57219 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #07 57221 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Solar Photovoltaic Project #03 57217 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #44 57540 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #42 57441 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #28 57247 0.0000
Solar Photovoltaic Project #48 57900 0.0000
Sky River LLC 50536 0.0000
Mountain View IV 57459 0.0000
Mountain View I&2 55719 0.0000
Edom Hills Project 1 LLC 50553 0.0000
Big Creek 1 317 0.0000
Big Creek 2 318 0.0000
Big Creek 2A 322 0.0000
Big Creek 3 319 0.0000
Big Creek 4 320 0.0000
Big Creek 8 321 0.0000
J S Eastwood 104 0.0000
Kern River 3 339 0.0000
Mammoth Pool 344 0.0000
Oxnard Wastewater Treatment Plant 50224 0.4369
Cal State Univ San Bernardino FC01 57544 0.2926
La Grange 440 0.0000
Turlock Lake 161 0.0000
Hickman 162 0.0000
Upper Dawson 489 0.0000
Golden Fields Solar I, LLC 60590 0.0000
Indian Valley Dam Hydro Project 50129 0.0000
H. Gonzales 56039 0.5924
Sullivan County - Adult Care Solar 60817 0.0000
Bear Valley Power Plant 56346 0.5434
Spring Canyon Expansion Wind Energy Ctr 58769 0.0000
CNE at Cambridge MD 59842 0.0000
Georgia Power at Wadley GA 59843 0.0000
Munich Re Plaza 59844 0.0000
Cedar Creek 3255 0.0000
FPL Energy Vansycle LLC (OR) 55989 0.0000
Gridley Main Two 58371 0.0000
Nacimiento Hydro Project 50352 0.0000
SEPV Imperial Dixieland East 60745 0.0000
SEPV Imperial Dixieland West 60744 0.0000
Seville 2 59723 0.0000
Midway Solar Farm II 60237 0.0000
Citizens Imperial Solar 62052 0.0000
Ormesa II 54724 0.0756
HL Solar 62655 0.0000
Mojave 16 50821 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Cottonwood Solar, LLC Cottonwood Carport 59703 0.0000
Tule River 289 0.0000
Angels 215 0.0000
Kingbird A Solar LLC 59868 0.0000
Stony Gorge 7151 0.0000
Grizzly 7338 0.0000
Friant Hydro Facility 50393 0.0000
Beardsley 414 0.0000
Black Butte 7229 0.0000
AVS Lancaster 1 60085 0.0000
Mount Signal Solar Farm V 61202 0.0000
Windland 50386 0.0000
Meadow Creek Project Company 58106 0.0000
Venice Hydro 72 0.0000
South Consolidated 100 0.0000
Horse Mesa 145 0.0000
Mormon Flat 148 0.0000
Roosevelt 149 0.0000
Stewart Mountain 150 0.0000
Lake Creek Dam 159 0.0000
Inskip 248 0.0000
Merced Falls 258 0.0000
San Joaquin 3 277 0.0000
Haiwee 398 0.0000
McSwain 410 0.0000
Woodleaf 419 0.0000
Devil Canyon 436 0.0000
Edward C Hyatt 437 0.0000
Cabin Creek 467 0.0000
Georgetown Hydro 472 0.0000
Grand Valley Project Power Plant 473 0.0000
Salida 474 0.0000
Shoshone (CO) 476 0.0000
Temescal 479 0.0000
Corona 480 0.0000
Rio Hondo 482 0.0000
Coyote Creek 483 0.0000
Red Mountain 484 0.0000
Manitou Springs 494 0.0000
Ruxton Park 495 0.0000
Boysen 505 0.0000
Lamar Plant 508 0.0000
Blue Mesa 512 0.0000
Estes 513 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Morrow Point 514 0.0000
Big Thompson 515 0.0000
Green Mountain 516 0.0000
Marys Lake 517 0.0000
Flatiron 518 0.0000
Pole Hill 519 0.0000
Lower Molina 520 0.0000
Upper Molina 521 0.0000
Navajo Dam 584 0.0000
South Fork Tolt 622 0.0000
Medicine Bow 692 0.0000
Moccasin Low Head Hydro Project 751 0.0000
Gem State 790 0.0000
American Falls 809 0.0000
Bliss 810 0.0000
Cascade Dam 813 0.0000
Clear Lake 814 0.0000
Lower Malad 815 0.0000
Lower Salmon 816 0.0000
Shoshone Falls 818 0.0000
Swan Falls 819 0.0000
Thousand Springs 820 0.0000
Twin Falls (ID) 821 0.0000
Upper Salmon A 822 0.0000
Upper Malad 823 0.0000
Dworshak 840 0.0000
City Power Plant 841 0.0000
Lower No 2 843 0.0000
Upper Power Plant 844 0.0000
Palisades Dam 850 0.0000
Albeni Falls 851 0.0000
Alamo 905 0.0000
Quincy Chute 917 0.0000
Hydro Plant No 3 925 0.0000
Manti Lower 1020 0.0000
Cochrane 2182 0.0000
Hauser 2185 0.0000
Morony 2191 0.0000
Mystic 2192 0.0000
Rainbow (MT) 2193 0.0000
Ryan 2194 0.0000
Hungry Horse 2203 0.0000
Yellowtail 2204 0.0000
Animas 2465 0.0000
East Side 3025 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Faraday 3045 0.0000
North Fork 3047 0.0000
River Mill 3049 0.0000
Round Butte 3050 0.0000
Sullivan 3053 0.0000
Carmen Smith 3067 0.0000
Leaburg 3068 0.0000
Walterville 3071 0.0000
Big Cliff 3074 0.0000
Cougar 3076 0.0000
Detroit 3077 0.0000
Dexter 3078 0.0000
Green Peter 3080 0.0000
Hills Creek 3081 0.0000
John Day 3082 0.0000
Lookout Point 3083 0.0000
McNary 3084 0.0000
Upper Beaver 3643 0.0000
Snake Creek 3658 0.0000
Brigham City 3666 0.0000
Hydro III 3675 0.0000
Manti Upper 3676 0.0000
Bartholomew 3688 0.0000
Spanish Fork 3691 0.0000
Gateway 3697 0.0000
Wanship 3698 0.0000
Boulder 3699 0.0000
Uintah 3704 0.0000
Electron 3854 0.0000
Meyers Falls 3868 0.0000
Yelm 3878 0.0000
The Dalles 3895 0.0000
Cushman 2 3915 0.0000
LaGrande 3916 0.0000
Mossyrock 3918 0.0000
Chief Joseph 3921 0.0000
Ice Harbor 3925 0.0000
Little Goose 3926 0.0000
Lower Monumental 3927 0.0000
Packwood 3929 0.0000
Fremont Canyon 4176 0.0000
Glendo 4177 0.0000
Guernsey 4178 0.0000
Kortes 4180 0.0000
Seminoe 4182 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Shoshone (WY) 4183 0.0000
Fontenelle 4185 0.0000
Island Park 4204 0.0000
PHP 1 4213 0.0000
PHP 2 4214 0.0000
Echo Dam 4263 0.0000
Helms Pumped Storage 6100 0.0000
Crystal 6159 0.0000
Grand Coulee 6163 0.0000
Libby 6172 0.0000
Lost Creek 6174 0.0000
Lower Granite 6175 0.0000
W E Warne 6196 0.0000
Ross 6202 0.0000
Ames Hydro 6207 0.0000
Mount Elbert 6208 0.0000
Felt 6359 0.0000
Strawberry Creek 6393 0.0000
Swift Creek 6394 0.0000
Anderson Ranch 6395 0.0000
Black Canyon 6396 0.0000
Boise R Diversion 6397 0.0000
Minidoka 6398 0.0000
Canyon Ferry 6400 0.0000
Elephant Butte 6402 0.0000
Green Springs 6403 0.0000
Deer Creek (UT) 6404 0.0000
Flaming Gorge 6405 0.0000
Chandler 6406 0.0000
Roza 6407 0.0000
Heart Mountain 6408 0.0000
Alcova 6409 0.0000
Madison Dam 6422 0.0000
Cedar Falls (WA) 6430 0.0000
Gorge 6431 0.0000
Diablo 6432 0.0000
Azusa 6449 0.0000
Oak Grove 6505 0.0000
Moyie Springs 6506 0.0000
Drop 2 (WA) 6507 0.0000
Fleish 6513 0.0000
Verdi 6531 0.0000
Washoe 6532 0.0000
Little Cottonwood 6537 0.0000
Foster 6552 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Fort Peck 6623 0.0000
Lake Mathews 6644 0.0000
Foothill Feeder 6645 0.0000
San Dimas 6646 0.0000
Yorba Linda 6647 0.0000
Lower No 1 7012 0.0000
Unit 4 7015 0.0000
Hydro II 7034 0.0000
Mojave Siphon 7072 0.0000
Upper Salmon B 7079 0.0000
PEC Headworks 7113 0.0000
Wynoochee 7127 0.0000
Thermalito Diverson Dam 7129 0.0000
Pine View Dam 7132 0.0000
Waddell 7164 0.0000
Milner Hydro 7190 0.0000
Tesla 7233 0.0000
Skookumchuck 7259 0.0000
Buffalo Bill 7317 0.0000
McPhee 7372 0.0000
Towaoc 7373 0.0000
Cowlitz Falls 7427 0.0000
Dalles Dam North Fishway Project 7431 0.0000
Basalt 7458 0.0000
Lake Mendocino 7489 0.0000
Stone Creek 7508 0.0000
McNary Dam Fish Attraction Project 7511 0.0000
Spirit Mountain 7541 0.0000
Causey 7548 0.0000
H M Jackson 7588 0.0000
El Vado Dam 7593 0.0000
Abiquiu Dam 7789 0.0000
Snoqualmie 2 7867 0.0000
Pine Flat 7907 0.0000
Kern Canyon 7911 0.0000
Diamond Valley Lake 7942 0.0000
Newhalem 9842 0.0000
Little Mac Project 10049 0.0000
Foothills Hydro Plant 10070 0.0000
Strontia Springs Hydro Plant 10081 0.0000
South Dry Creek Hydro 10138 0.0000
Birch Creek Power 10140 0.0000
South Forks Hydro 10296 0.0000
Copper Dam Plant 10323 0.0000
Peters Drive Plant 10324 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Mink Creek Hydro 10325 0.0000
Dillon Hydro Plant 10421 0.0000
Williams Fork Hydro Plant 10422 0.0000
North Fork Hydro Plant 10423 0.0000
Gross Hydro Plant 10424 0.0000
Barber Dam 10735 0.0000
Sprague Hydro 10737 0.0000
Magic Dam Hydroelectric Project 10740 0.0000
Koyle Ranch Hydroelectric Project 10781 0.0000
Crystal Springs 10806 0.0000
Dietrich Drop 10807 0.0000
Low Line Rapids 10808 0.0000
Rock Creek II 10809 0.0000
Sheep Creek Hydro 50091 0.0000
R E Badger Filtration Plant 50147 0.0000
Vallecito Hydroelectric 50206 0.0000
Rocky Brook Hydroelectric 50228 0.0000
New Lahontan 50261 0.0000
Redlands Water & Power 50267 0.0000
Marco Ranch 50323 0.0000
Michell Butte Power Project 50360 0.0000
Owyhee Dam Power Project 50361 0.0000
Tunnel 1 Power Project 50362 0.0000
Upriver Dam Hydro Plant 50380 0.0000
Twin Reservoirs 50382 0.0000
Cowiche 50423 0.0000
Sugarloaf Hydro Plant 50435 0.0000
Lilliwaup Falls Generating 50700 0.0000
Notch Butte Hydro 50718 0.0000
Stillwater Facility 50765 0.0000
East Winds Project 50820 0.0000
Twin Falls Hydro 50827 0.0000
El Dorado Hydro Elk Creek 50891 0.0000
Bypass 50895 0.0000
S E Hazelton A 50896 0.0000
Middle Fork Irrigation District 50917 0.0000
Galesville Project 50938 0.0000
Slate Creek 50961 0.0000
Marsh Valley Development 50972 0.0000
Siphon Power Project 50980 0.0000
Rock Creek I 50987 0.0000
Quail Creek Hydro Plant #1 52039 0.0000
Mojave 4 52142 0.0000
Lacomb Irrigation District 52155 0.0000
Helzel & Schwarzhoff 88 Wind Farm 52165 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Falls Creek 52187 0.0000
Broadwater Power Project 54006 0.0000
San Gabriel Hydro Project 54017 0.0000
Hillcrest Pump Station 54142 0.0000
Opal Springs Hydro 54251 0.0000
Koma Kulshan Associates 54267 0.0000
Wilson Lake Hydroelectric Project 54306 0.0000
Little Wood Hydro Project 54386 0.0000
Weeks Falls 54387 0.0000
Dry Creek Project 54394 0.0000
EDF Renewable Windfarm V Inc 54453 0.0000
Blind Canyon Hydro 54514 0.0000
Horseshoe Bend Hydroelectric Co 54524 0.0000
Hazelton B Hydro 54558 0.0000
Swanmill Windfarm I 54650 0.0000
Kanaka 54653 0.0000
Falls River Hydro 54668 0.0000
Ford Hydro LP 54674 0.0000
Boulder City Lakewood Hydro 54679 0.0000
Boulder City Betasso Hydro Plant 54680 0.0000
Difwind Farms Ltd VI 54686 0.0000
Warm Springs Power Enterprises 54721 0.0000
Taylor Draw Hydroelectric Facility 54729 0.0000
Mile 28 Water Power Project 54812 0.0000
Black Creek 54860 0.0000
Vansycle 55125 0.0000
FPL Energy Vansycle LLC (WA) 55560 0.0000
Foote Creek IV 55610 0.0000
Condon Windpower LLC 55739 0.0000
Ridge Crest Wind Partners 55741 0.0000
Boulder City Silver Lake Hydro 55931 0.0000
New Mexico Wind Energy Center 56097 0.0000
Kimball Wind 56106 0.0000
Colorado Green Holdings LLC 56173 0.0000
Combine Hills I 56195 0.0000
Prescott Airport 56228 0.0000
Helzel & Schwarzhoff 86 56275 0.0000
ZCO 56276 0.0000
Fossil Gulch 56308 0.0000
Aragonne Wind LLC 56336 0.0000
Burley Butte Windpark 56434 0.0000
Golden Valley Wind Park LLC 56435 0.0000
Milner Dam Wind Park LLC 56437 0.0000
Oregon Trail Wind Park 56439 0.0000
Salmon Falls Wind Park 56441 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Thousand Springs Wind Park 56442 0.0000
Tuana Gulch Wind Park 56443 0.0000
SunE Alamosa 56481 0.0000
Mora Drop Hydroelectric Project 56498 0.0000
Tiber Dam Hydroelectric Plant 56499 0.0000
Nellis Air Force Base Solar Array 56568 0.0000
Horseshoe Bend Wind Park 56591 0.0000
Mountain Home 56636 0.0000
Bennett Creek Windfarm LLC "Mountain
Home" 56637 0.0000
Russell D Smith 56694 0.0000
Summer Falls Power Plant 56695 0.0000
Eltopia Branch Canal 4.6 56696 0.0000
Potholes East Canal 66.0 56697 0.0000
Main Canal Headworks 56698 0.0000
Spanish Fork Wind Park 2 LLC 56751 0.0000
Solana Generating Station 56812 0.0000
Denver Int Airport 56815 0.0000
Wheat Field Wind Power Project 56854 0.0000
Bolthouse S&P and Rowen Farms Solar 56862 0.0000
Chester Diversion Hydroelectric Project 56893 0.0000
Gap Pacific Distribution Center 56909 0.0000
WWRF Solar Plant 56922 0.0000
Threemile Canyon 56933 0.0000
Cassia Wind 56934 0.0000
Cassia Gulch 56935 0.0000
High Lonesome Mesa LLC 56945 0.0000
Happy Jack Windpower Project 56960 0.0000
Butter Creek Power LLC 56967 0.0000
Big Top LLC 56968 0.0000
Four Corners Windfarm LLC 56969 0.0000
Four Mile Canyon Windfarm LLC 56970 0.0000
Oregon Trail Windfarm LLC 56971 0.0000
Pacific Canyon Windfarm LLC 56972 0.0000
Sand Ranch Windfarm LLC 56973 0.0000
Wagon Trail LLC 56974 0.0000
Ward Butte Windfarm LLC 56975 0.0000
Arrowrock Hydroelectric Project 56997 0.0000
SunEdison Walgreens Moreno Valley 57004 0.0000
Mariani Packing Vacaville Solar 57005 0.0000
Walgreens Woodland Distribution Center 57006 0.0000
SunEdison Ironwood State Prison 57007 0.0000
SunEdison Procter & Gamble Oxnard 57008 0.0000
Kohls San Bernardino Solar Facility 57009 0.0000
SunEdison Anheuser Busch Fairfield 57010 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Chuckawalla Valley State Prison 57011 0.0000
SunEdison Walmart Apple Valley DC 57012 0.0000
NaturEner Glacier Wind Energy 2 57050 0.0000
Silver Sage Windpower 57091 0.0000
Casper Wind Farm 57093 0.0000
Dry Lake Wind LLC 57098 0.0000
Payne's Ferry 57124 0.0000
Camp Reed 57125 0.0000
Yahoo Creek 57126 0.0000
Tuana Springs 57136 0.0000
RV CSU Power LLC 57141 0.0000
Colorado Highlands Wind 57174 0.0000
Cimarron Solar Facility 57243 0.0000
Kit Carson Windpower 57244 0.0000
Victor Valley CC CPV Solar 57254 0.0000
Texico Wind Ranch LP 57258 0.0000
Crescent Dunes Solar Energy 57275 0.0000
Dutch Wind Energy 57301 0.0000
Maclay Solar Project 57308 0.0000
Pacific Cruise Ship Terminals Berth 93 57309 0.0000
1420 Coil Av #C 57310 0.0000
Occidental College Solar Project 57311 0.0000
Metro Support Services Center Solar 57313 0.0000
San Luis Valley Solar Ranch 57317 0.0000
Poseidon Solar, LLC 57318 0.0000
Luke Solar 57324 0.0000
Roadrunner Solar 57338 0.0000
Red Mesa Wind LLC 57357 0.0000
Siphon Drop Power Plant 57364 0.0000
Cogentrix of Alamosa 57368 0.0000
Questa Solar Facility 57369 0.0000
Bellevue Solar Project 57372 0.0000
Greater Sandhill I 57377 0.0000
Poseidon Wind, LLC 57379 0.0000
UASTP I 57392 0.0000
Yolo County Solar Project 57422 0.0000
Buffalo Ridge II LLC 57424 0.0000
Ryegrass Windfarm 57427 0.0000
Hammett Hill Windfarm 57428 0.0000
Mainline Windfarm 57429 0.0000
Desert Meadow Windfarm 57430 0.0000
Cold Springs Windfarm 57431 0.0000
Juniper Ridge Hydroelectric Project 57437 0.0000
Silver State Solar Power North 57442 0.0000
Two Ponds Windfarm 57444 0.0000
Version: May 2022
FRV SI Transport Solar LP 57506 0.0000
RV CSU Power II LLC 57507 0.0000
Carson Solar I 57509 0.0000
Roger Road WWTP 57524 0.0000
Garland Canal Power Plant 57551 0.0000
AFA Solar Farm 57554 0.0000
La Senita 57556 0.0000
Chino Solar Valley 57560 0.0000
Cotton Center Solar Hybrid 57561 0.0000
Paloma Solar Hybrid 57562 0.0000
Hyder Solar Hybrid 57563 0.0000
Albuquerque Solar Energy Center 57567 0.0000
Los Lunas Solar Energy Center 57571 0.0000
Deming Solar Energy Center 57575 0.0000
Las Vegas Solar Energy Center 57576 0.0000
Alamogordo Solar Energy Center 57577 0.0000
PaTu Wind Farm LLC 57578 0.0000
Robert O Schulz Solar Farm 57579 0.0000
Hatch Solar Energy Center I, LLC 57591 0.0000
Teichert Materials-Teichert Vernalis 57594 0.0000
Foundation ST 57626 0.0000
Vestas Towers America, Inc. 57643 0.0000
City & County of Denver at Denver Int'l 57645 0.0000
Yamhill Solar LLC 57652 0.0000
Bakersfield College Solar 01 57655 0.0000
Avra Valley Solar 57657 0.0000
Macys Goodyear 57673 0.0000
Post Rock Wind Power Project, LLC 57678 0.0000
City of Boulder WWTP 57681 0.0000
City of Madera WWTP 57682 0.0000
Staples La Mirada, CA 57683 0.0000
Turnbull Hydro 57690 0.0000
Flatirons Campus (FC) 57692 0.0000
DOE Golden NWTC Research Side Hybrid 57693 0.0000
DOE Golden NREL Main Campus 57694 0.0000
Aerojet I 57697 0.0000
Aerojet II 57698 0.0000
SPS1 Dollarhide 57736 0.0000
SPS2 Jal 57737 0.0000
SPS3 Lea 57738 0.0000
SPS4 Monument 57739 0.0000
SPS5 Hopi 57740 0.0000
Gordon Butte Wind LLC 57748 0.0000
Sawtooth Wind Project 57749 0.0000
Coastal Energy Project 57756 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Power County Wind Park South 57760 0.0000
Power County Wind Park North 57761 0.0000
Youngs Creek Hydroelectric Project 57763 0.0000
Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake 57764 0.0000
Arizona Western College PV 57765 0.0000
Rockland Wind Farm 57766 0.0000
Palo Verde College 57773 0.0000
Kingman 1 57775 0.0000
RE Bagdad Solar I LLC 57790 0.0000
Foundation AB 57791 0.0000
Foundation IE 57792 0.0000
RE Ajo 1 LLC 57795 0.0000
Lime Wind 57803 0.0000
Dinuba Wastewater Treatment Plant 57827 0.0000
ISH Solar Hospital SDMC 57840 0.0000
ISH Solar Hospital Downey 57841 0.0000
North Hollywood 57854 0.0000
Univ of California San Diego Solar 57856 0.0000
Castle Rock Vineyards 57870 0.0000
2555 E Olympic Bl 57871 0.0000
Baldock Solar Highway 57882 0.0000
Queen Creek Solar Farm 57883 0.0000
Improvement Dst No. 4 57895 0.0000
Solar Star California II LLC 57933 0.0000
Walmart Casa Grande 57939 0.0000
Macho Springs Power I 57947 0.0000
Musselshell Wind Project 57963 0.0000
Musselshell Wind Project Two LLC 57965 0.0000
Butte College Main Campus Solar 57970 0.0000
Busch Ranch Wind Energy Farm 57980 0.0000
Meridian Vineyards 57982 0.0000
SunE EPE2 LLC 57985 0.0000
SunE EPE1 LLC 57986 0.0000
Foothills Solar Plant Hybrid 57997 0.0000
Salt Palace Solar Gen Plant 58006 0.0000
WSMR I 58010 0.0000
High Mesa 58019 0.0000
IKEA Tejon 345 58028 0.0000
Buckeye Union HS District 201 58037 0.0000
Black Mountain Solar LLC 58042 0.0000
Edwards Air Force Base 58076 0.0000
Intel Folsom 58086 0.0000
Foundation Cemex River Plant 58101 0.0000
Foundation Cemex BMQ 58102 0.0000
Foundation Superior Farms 58104 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Foundation Wal-Mart Red Bluff 58105 0.0000
Foundation Cemex Madison 58112 0.0000
Foundation RRM 58113 0.0000
Foundation NWNA 58114 0.0000
Depot Park Solar System 58119 0.0000
Outback Solar At Christmas Valley 58131 0.0000
Prescott Solar Plant 58147 0.0000
Black Cap Solar Plant 58150 0.0000
Crafton Hills College Solar Farm 58170 0.0000
Prairie Fire 58171 0.0000
Saddle Mountain Solar I 58213 0.0000
Grassland 1&2 Solar Project 58217 0.0000
Spion Kop Wind Farm 58218 0.0000
Tahquitz High School 58232 0.0000
Kit Carson 58240 0.0000
West Valley High School Solar 58244 0.0000
VA Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center 58249 0.0000
Los Alamos PV Site 58256 0.0000
FAA NorCal TRACON 58261 0.0000
Badger 1 58262 0.0000
Jewish Community Center PV 58292 0.0000
Paradise Valley H.S. PV 58293 0.0000
Gridley Main 58370 0.0000
Hyder II Hybrid 58383 0.0000
Fargo Drop 58384 0.0000
Flint Creek Hydroelectric LLC 58392 0.0000
CSU Northridge Plant 58422 0.0000
Swauk Wind LLC 58441 0.0000
45 Mile Hydroelectric Project 58455 0.0000
C-Drop Hydro 58470 0.0000
Las Vegas WPCF Solar Plant 58477 0.0000
SEV NM Phase 2 58479 0.0000
CSU Pueblo 58481 0.0000
Picture Rocks Solar, LLC 58486 0.0000
Apex Solar PV Power Project 58489 0.0000
Spectrum Solar PV Power Project 58490 0.0000
RE Gillespie 1 LLC 58501 0.0000
Chuckawalla Solar 58506 0.0000
Ironwood Solar LLC 58513 0.0000
Union HS at Casa Grande 58516 0.0000
Vista Grande HS at Casa Grande 58517 0.0000
Otero Solar 58520 0.0000
Manzano Solar 58521 0.0000
Madera Community Hospital 58522 0.0000
Crown Cooling Facility 58527 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Lake Pleasant WTP 58539 0.0000
Silver City WWTP PV Project 58540 0.0000
Gilbert Solar Facility I, LLC 58543 0.0000
Mountain View Solar 58544 0.0000
Community Solar 1 58545 0.0000
SMPA Solar 1 Community Solar 58547 0.0000
Huerfano River Wind 58548 0.0000
GSE NM1 58576 0.0000
Sue Cleveland High School 58588 0.0000
Rio Rancho High School 58589 0.0000
Beryl Solar Plant 58598 0.0000
Cedar Valley Solar Plant 58599 0.0000
Buckhorn Solar Plant 58600 0.0000
Milford Flat Solar Plant 58601 0.0000
Laho Solar Plant 58602 0.0000
Greenville Solar Plant 58603 0.0000
Granite Peak Solar Plant 58604 0.0000
Sol Orchard El Centro PV 58621 0.0000
Carter Hydro 58622 0.0000
Actus Lend Lease DMAFB 58632 0.0000
Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control
Agency 58633 0.0000
Lancaster Baptist Church 58634 0.0000
Sacramento Fairbain Water Treatment Plant 58636 0.0000
Utah Red Hills Renewable Energy Park 58660 0.0000
Blue Sky One 58689 0.0000
Nooksack Hydro 58696 0.0000
Mira Loma 58698 0.0000
Phoenix Airport East Economy Lot 58708 0.0000
Phoenix Airport Rental Car Center 58709 0.0000
North Bay Solar 1 58748 0.0000
Expressway Solar A 58761 0.0000
Expressway Solar B 58762 0.0000
South Canal Hydro-1 58783 0.0000
South Canal Hydro-3 58784 0.0000
Storrie Lake Solar Project 58794 0.0000
Cogenra - TEP 58832 0.0000
Red Horse 2 58833 0.0000
Gato Montes Solar, LLC 58842 0.0000
ASTI 58889 0.0000
Beringer 58890 0.0000
Prosperity Energy Storage Facility Hybrid 58899 0.0000
Tri-County Water Hydropower Project 58901 0.0000
Intel Folsom Phase 2 58954 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Oregon University System OIT Klamath Falls 58961 0.0000 Las Virgenes Municipal Water District 58963 0.0000
Fairfield Wind 58966 0.0000
Fort Huachuca Solar PV Project 58972 0.0000
RE Camelot LLC 58983 0.0000
Two Dot Wind Farm 59003 0.0000
Gila Bend Hybrid 59020 0.0000
Rio Rico Solar 59044 0.0000
Vacaville 59058 0.0000
Chopin Wind LLC 59076 0.0000
CSD 2- Freedom High 59129 0.0000
CSD 2 - Heritage High 59130 0.0000
Dartmouth Landfill 59131 0.0000
EAFB - North Base 59132 0.0000
EAFB - South Base 59133 0.0000
SDCCD - Miramar 59138 0.0000
SDCWA - Twin Oaks 59139 0.0000
Brighton PV Solar Plant 59144 0.0000
Avalon Solar 59168 0.0000
Sterling PV 3 59198 0.0000
Mesa PV1 59199 0.0000
Eagle Springs Solar LLC 59239 0.0000
California PV Energy at ISD WWTP 59283 0.0000
Sacramento (SMUD) 59323 0.0000
Golden Acorn Casino 59328 0.0000
City of Soledad Water Reclamation 59329 0.0000
Taylor Farms 59330 0.0000
Anheuser-Busch #2 59331 0.0000
Dorena Hydro-Electric Facility 59357 0.0000
Old Mill Solar 59374 0.0000
Escalante Solar I, LLC 59387 0.0000
Escalante Solar II, LLC 59388 0.0000
Escalante Solar III, LLC 59389 0.0000
Eubank Landfill Solar Array 59393 0.0000
Searchlight Solar 59404 0.0000
Newman Solar 59407 0.0000
Solar Las Vegas MB-1 59430 0.0000
Desert Star 59444 0.0000
Valencia Solar 59454 0.0000
Tech Park Solar 59455 0.0000
Denver Intl Airport IV Solar 59462 0.0000
Ft. Churchill PV 59472 0.0000
Apple Campus 2 PV 59473 0.0000
Jett Creek Windfarm (Burnt River) 59490 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Benson Creek Windfarm (Burnt River) 59491 0.0000
Durbin Creek Windfarm (Burnt River) 59492 0.0000
Prospector Windfarm (Burnt River) 59493 0.0000
Willow Spring Windfarm (Burnt River) 59494 0.0000
Wright Solar Park 59525 0.0000
Sandoval Solar Energy Center 59558 0.0000
Springer Solar 1 59560 0.0000
Meadow Lake Solar Energy Center 59618 0.0000
Cibola 59619 0.0000
South Milford Solar Plant 59620 0.0000
Sandstone Solar 59634 0.0000
Forever 21 Retail, Inc. 59651 0.0000
Nordhoff Place 59652 0.0000
City of Truth or Consequences PV 59653 0.0000
Comanche Solar 59656 0.0000
Imperial Valley Solar Co (IVSC) 2, LLC 59657 0.0000
Mt. Home Solar 1, LLC 59695 0.0000
Sunnyside Ranch Community Solar Array 59742 0.0000
DSH (CA) - Coalinga State Hospital 59746 0.0000
River Mountains Solar 59747 0.0000
CDCR (CA) - Pleasant Valley State Prison 59748 0.0000
Davis Monthan AFB (AZ) West Airfield 59779 0.0000
Fiddler's Canyon #2 59786 0.0000
Fiddler's Canyon #1 59787 0.0000
Oregon University System Rabbit Field 59790 0.0000
Colon PV 59798 0.0000
Airport 1 Solar (DIA) 59807 0.0000
Tooele Army Depot 59817 0.0000
Mohave Electric at Fort Mohave 59819 0.0000
Playa Solar 1, LLC 59827 0.0000
Pikes Peak Solar Garden 1 LLC CSG 59848 0.0000
Adams Community Solar Garden LLC 59849 0.0000
Adams Community Solar Garden III LLC 59850 0.0000
UC Davis South Campus 59872 0.0000
Nellis Solar PV II 59919 0.0000
Fiddler's Canyon 3 59932 0.0000
Iron Springs Solar, LLC 59941 0.0000
Granite Mountain Solar West, LLC 59945 0.0000
Granite Mountain Solar East, LLC 59946 0.0000
Milford 2 59958 0.0000
Golden West Power Partners LLC 59974 0.0000
Carousel Wind Farm LLC 59975 0.0000
Hooper Solar 60008 0.0000
SR Jenkins Ft Lupton 60023 0.0000
Steel Bridge Solar, LLC 60057 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Lindberg FIeld Solar 60060 0.0000
Avalon Solar II 60062 0.0000
Fresno Solar 60083 0.0000
Oregon Convention Center 60112 0.0000
Granby Hydro 60119 0.0000
Peak View Wind Farm 60143 0.0000
Solverde 1 60185 0.0000
Whitethorn Solar LLC 60193 0.0000
South Valley Solar Energy Center 60195 0.0000
Santa Fe Solar Energy Center 60196 0.0000
Santolina Solar Energy Center 60197 0.0000
Rio Communities Solar Energy Center 60198 0.0000
Strata Roof 1 60219 0.0000
Estrella Mountain PV 60230 0.0000
Genentech-Oceanside Hybrid 60231 0.0000
Valley View Solar 60247 0.0000
Skylark 60248 0.0000
Weymouth Solar Plant 60255 0.0000
Alta Luna 60258 0.0000
Playa Solar 2 60261 0.0000
SR Mavericks 60283 0.0000
Red Horse III 60285 0.0000
Montana Solar Facility 60300 0.0000
Holloman Solar Facility 60301 0.0000
San Isabel Solar, LLC 60304 0.0000
Jeffco Community Solar Gardens LLC 60320 0.0000
Grove Solar Center, LLC 60330 0.0000
Hyline Solar Center, LLC 60331 0.0000
Open Range Solar Center, LLC 60332 0.0000
Railroad Solar Center, LLC 60333 0.0000
Thunderegg Solar Center, LLC 60334 0.0000
Vale Air Solar Center, LLC 60335 0.0000
Wal-Mart Truth or Consequences PV 60341 0.0000
Solar Las Vegas MB 2, LLC 60350 0.0000
Bison Solar LLC 60351 0.0000
Boulder Solar Power, LLC 60352 0.0000
Sulphur Springs 60381 0.0000
Bonnybrooke PV 60413 0.0000
Calligan Creek Hydroelectric Project 60418 0.0000
RCWD PV Project 60426 0.0000
CA Dept of Public Health at Richmond 60428 0.0000
Three Peaks Power 60432 0.0000
E&B Resources 60446 0.0000
Corcoran 60450 0.0000
Red Rock 60467 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Greenfield Wind - MT 60486 0.0000
Springbok 3 Solar Farm Hybrid 60491 0.0000
SR Skylark B 60497 0.0000
Clear Spring Ranch PV Project 60511 0.0000
Hancock Creek Hydroelectric Project 60517 0.0000
NorWest Energy 2, LLC 60548 0.0000
Solar Blythe 2 60558 0.0000
Jacobson 5 MW Solar 60603 0.0000
BC Solar 60616 0.0000
Rush Creek Wind 60619 0.0000
Amphitheater High School Solar 60684 0.0000
Canyon Del Oro High School Solar 60685 0.0000
Weld 1 Community Solar Array 60720 0.0000
Logan 1 Community Solar Array 60722 0.0000
Conejos 1 Community Solar Array 60723 0.0000
Arapahoe 3 Community Solar Array 60724 0.0000
Xcel Adams 2 Community Solar Array 60725 0.0000
Xcel Adams 1 Community Solar Array 60726 0.0000
Victory Solar LLC 60764 0.0000
SunAnza 60791 0.0000
CEC Solar #1117, LLC 60801 0.0000
Cloverdale Solar Center 60813 0.0000
Weber State University - Davis Campus PV 60821 0.0000
Intel - Ocotillo Campus Solar 60822 0.0000
Valley Sanitary District WTP Solar 60824 0.0000
Genentech Vacaville Meter #1 60844 0.0000
US GSA - Sacramento 60846 0.0000
Dept of General Services -FTB 60861 0.0000
Timothy Lake Powerhouse 60868 0.0000
Solar Star California, XLIV, LLC 60869 0.0000
Boulder Solar II, LLC 60885 0.0000
Pavant Solar III 60886 0.0000
Westmont 300B 60914 0.0000
OSLH, LLC 60976 0.0000
CSUF State College 60978 0.0000
CSUF Nutwood Solar 60979 0.0000
Lindberg Field Solar 2 60984 0.0000
Iron Horse Battery Storage Hybrid 60996 0.0000
SCDA Solar 1 61006 0.0000
Twin Buttes II Wind 61040 0.0000
Foundation CDCR LAC 61066 0.0000
Foundation Scheid Vineyards 61067 0.0000
Pima Community College - East Campus 61104 0.0000
Quichapa 1 61119 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Quichapa 2 61120 0.0000
Quichapa 3 61121 0.0000
Intel Folsom Phase 3 61152 0.0000
Big Timber Wind Farm 61155 0.0000
Columbus Solar Project 61165 0.0000
Shavano Falls Hydro 61189 0.0000
Shavano Falls Hydro Drop 4 61190 0.0000
Drop 5 61191 0.0000
IKEA Las Vegas 462 61193 0.0000
Merck - Upper Gwynedd Solar Array 61198 0.0000
T0588 Phoenix - AZ 61199 0.0000
OR Solar 3, LLC 61201 0.0000
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation PV 61209 0.0000
Head of U Canal Hydro Project 61217 0.0000
Westmont 300A 61249 0.0000
Kayenta Solar Project 61268 0.0000
Gray Hawk Solar 61272 0.0000
River Bend Solar, LLC 61289 0.0000
South Mills Solar, LLC 61290 0.0000
Green Meadow Solar, LLC 61291 0.0000
SR Kersey 61314 0.0000
Great Divide Solar, LLC 61335 0.0000
Black Eagle Solar, LLC 61336 0.0000
Magpie Solar, LLC 61337 0.0000
Mill Creek Solar (OR) 61338 0.0000
Westmont 400A 61348 0.0000
Westmont 400B 61349 0.0000
Amazon - Patterson PV 61377 0.0000
OR Solar 5, LLC 61423 0.0000
OR Solar 8, LLC 61424 0.0000
Coyote Ridge Community Solar 61425 0.0000
OR Solar 6, LLC 61430 0.0000
Panasonic Carport Solar Hybrid 61439 0.0000
Foundation California Training Facility 61442 0.0000
Foundation Mann Packing 61443 0.0000
Foundation SaIinas Valley State Prison 61444 0.0000
SR Platte Solar Farm 61462 0.0000
Vandenberg Solar Project 61463 0.0000
San Luis Solar Garden 61472 0.0000
Klamath Falls Solar 2 CSG 61553 0.0000
Facebook 1 Solar Energy Center 61556 0.0000
Facebook 2 Solar Energy Center 61557 0.0000
Facebook 3 Solar Energy Center 61558 0.0000
Woodline Solar 61559 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Eagle Point Solar 61560 0.0000
Denver Metro Solar 61563 0.0000
Tumbleweed Solar, LLC 61580 0.0000
San Luis Valley Solar Array 61605 0.0000
Vilas Solar Array 61606 0.0000
Stenner Creek Solar 61607 0.0000
Techren Solar I LLC 61611 0.0000
CDCR (CA) - Solano State Prison 61619 0.0000
CDCR (CA) - Corcoran State Prison 61620 0.0000
CDCR (CA) - Wasco State Prison 61621 0.0000
Kilroy Solar 61628 0.0000
Chiloquin Solar, LLC 61631 0.0000
Carrizozo Solar 61662 0.0000
Pinal Central Energy Center Hybrid 61678 0.0000
USG 1 61682 0.0000
USG 2 61683 0.0000
IVC Solar 61692 0.0000
Folsom SP and CSP Sacramento 61698 0.0000
Aerolease 61718 0.0000
Quincy II Solar Garden 61752 0.0000
Imboden Solar Garden 61753 0.0000
Stage Gulch Solar 61791 0.0000
Lavio Solar 61792 0.0000
EGP Stillwater Solar PV II, LLC 61809 0.0000
Titan Solar 61811 0.0000
Target Shafter 61824 0.0000
Dignity - Siena Campus 61825 0.0000
Dayton Cutoff Solar 61827 0.0000
Valley Creek Solar 61828 0.0000
Silverton Solar 61829 0.0000
Sheep Solar 61830 0.0000
Colton Solar 61831 0.0000
Interstate Solar 61832 0.0000
Soboba Community Solar Project 61834 0.0000
Grand Ronde Solar 61835 0.0000
SeaWorld Aquatica 61843 0.0000
Jordanelle Dam Hydroelectric Project 61853 0.0000
Dignity - San Martin 61862 0.0000
Bar D 61886 0.0000
National Raisin 61894 0.0000
Casa Mesa Wind Energy Center Hybrid 61925 0.0000
Techren Solar II LLC 61930 0.0000
Adams Nielson Solar 61933 0.0000
Gavilan District College Solar Project 61993 0.0000
UC Merced Solar Hybrid 61995 0.0000
Version: May 2022
UC Riverside Lots 30 & 32 62016 0.0000
Stanford Campus Solar 62020 0.0000
CSU Long Beach Lots 7 & 14 62028 0.0000
Santa Rosa Junior College Petaluma Solar 62039 0.0000
Pima Community College 62075 0.0000
Blue Shld Of Cal- El Dorado Hlls Mtr B 62077 0.0000
Roseville Solar 62114 0.0000
Syncarpha Eagle Nest 62149 0.0000
Chaffey College Rancho Cucamonga Campus 62150 0.0000
Clif Bar Bakery of Twin Falls 62151 0.0000
Boring Solar LLC 62169 0.0000
Ballston Solar LLC 62170 0.0000
Labish Solar LLC 62171 0.0000
CNMEC Solar Energy Center 62191 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXVII LLC 62224 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXX LLC (CSG) 62239 0.0000
NorWest Energy 9 LLC 62241 0.0000
County of San Diego SBRC 62242 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXI (CSG) 62243 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXXI LLC (CSG) 62244 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXV LLC (CSG) 62245 0.0000
Target Woodland Solar Project 62246 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXXII (CSG) 62251 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXII LLC (CSG) 62252 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXIV LLC (CSG) 62253 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXVI LLC 62254 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXVIII LLC (CSG) 62255 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXIII LLC (CSG) 62256 0.0000
Trout Creek Solar 62260 0.0000
Liberty HS Solar Project 62274 0.0000
Frontier HS Solar Project 62275 0.0000
Francisco St. Solar 62287 0.0000
Grazing Yak Solar 62376 0.0000
City of Gallup Solar 62406 0.0000
Busch Ranch II Wind Farm 62445 0.0000
Vista Solar Energy Center 62467 0.0000
Airport Solar 62560 0.0000
Preferred Freezer San Leandro 62578 0.0000
Rio De Oro Solar Energy Center 62597 0.0000
PFMG Solar Grossmont Helix LLC 62611 0.0000
NVSS-II 62636 0.0000
AZ State University - Tempe Campus Solar 62643 0.0000
SFDK Solar 62649 0.0000
Gilcrest Solar 62663 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Quincy Solar 62664 0.0000
Lafayette Horizon Solar CSG LLC 62667 0.0000
American Canyon Solar 62687 0.0000
Malech Solar Farm 62688 0.0000
Hellyer Solar Farm 62689 0.0000
Guadalupe Solar Farm 62690 0.0000
Mesa CSG 2 Massicotte 62718 0.0000
Mesa CSG 1 Murdock 62719 0.0000
Solar Star Palo Alto I, LLC 62732 0.0000
RC Energy AA LLC Solar Facility 62756 0.0000
Bloomington Solar I 62805 0.0000
Amazon Denver DEN3 62877 0.0000
Desert Star Hybrid 62965 0.0000
Grossmont HS Solar Project 62987 0.0000
Bluewater CDEC 1 62994 0.0000
Grants CDEC 2 62995 0.0000
SCCCD - Clovis Community College 63021 0.0000
Gloucester Solar 63031 0.0000
SCCCD - Fresno Community College 63068 0.0000
Reedley Community College Solar 63074 0.0000
San Miguel I Solar Energy Center 63081 0.0000
San Miguel II Solar Energy Center 63082 0.0000
Syncarpha El Rito 63124 0.0000
Tom Sifers Solar 63163 0.0000
Whiskey Hill Solar 63164 0.0000
Rio Rancho Solar Energy Center 63184 0.0000
CID Solar (CA) 63204 0.0000
Rafael Solar 63206 0.0000
Case Creek Solar 63207 0.0000
Kale Patch Solar 63208 0.0000
Mtn. Solar 1 63276 0.0000
Mtn. Solar 2 63277 0.0000
CO LI CSG 1 - Kamerra 63278 0.0000
Garrett Solar 63301 0.0000
Alticor Inc - Solar Project 63303 0.0000
Starvation 63344 0.0000
OE_AZ1 63349 0.0000
Medline Ind. Phase 2 Tracy 63361 0.0000
Niagara Bottling Stockton 63363 0.0000
Phelan Pinon Hills CSD Solar 63376 0.0000
Castaic Lake Phase II 63385 0.0000
City of Rio Rancho WWTP 63391 0.0000
Tickle Creek Solar 63442 0.0000
Thomas Creek Solar 63443 0.0000
RE-VFO LLC 63455 0.0000
Version: May 2022
D'Arrigo Brothers - Phase 4 63486 0.0000
PSREC/SIAD Solar 63493 0.0000
Moonlight Packing - Phase 2 63514 0.0000
California City 63516 0.0000
Pima Community College NW 63531 0.0000
Amazon_DEN2 63536 0.0000
Mohave Electric Cooperative at Joy Lane 63554 0.0000
Britton Solar Energy Center 63579 0.0000
SR Kersey II 63586 0.0000
SR Skylark C 63587 0.0000
Pleasanton - Amador Valley High School 63630 0.0000
North Kern State Prison Phase II 63651 0.0000
IBM Solar 63869 0.0000
Vacaville Hospital 63928 0.0000
Hyperion Treatment Plant CHP Plant 60960 0.5283
Valero Wilmington Cogeneration Plant 63285 0.4968
Mohave County Wind Farm 63114 0.0000
Irwindale Brew Yard, LLC 58056 4.8962
Dillon Wind LLC 56791 0.0000
American Kings Solar, LLC 60777 0.0000
Maverick Solar, LLC 62178 0.0000
Borden Solar Farm 59531 0.0000
Sun Streams, LLC 60827 0.0000
Blythe Solar III, LLC Hybrid 60094 0.0000
Highline 7224 0.0000
Beacon BESS 1 61431 0.0000
Oregon State University 57653 0.2210
Veyo 3635 0.0000
Southern Owens Valley Solar Ranch 57304 0.0000
Van Norman Bypass Solar Project 57307 0.0000
LATTC South Campus Solar 57312 0.0000
Foothill Solar Project 59799 0.0000
Blythe Solar IV, LLC 60095 0.0000
Rancho Seco Solar II, LLC 63387 0.0000
Wildflower Solar I, LLC 62988 0.0000
Walnut Power Plant 4256 0.3973
Lopez Canyon 57730 1.1111
USPS FiT 1B - BP14-009B-7001 S Central 61251 0.0000
USPS FiT 2A - BP14-011A-7001 S Central 61252 0.0000
USPS FiT 2B - BP14-011B-7001 S Central 61253 0.0000
SANTA MARIA II LFG POWER PLANT 57100 1.1111
Columbia Generating Station 371 0.0000
Thermalito 438 0.0000
Rock Creek LP 50892 0.0000
ELACC Photovoltaic Power Facility 56814 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Los Angeles Harbor College 57314 0.0000
GE - Tehachapi 57566 0.0000
FRB Solar Farm 57930 0.0000
Pierce College 58248 0.0000
Little Bear Solar 1, LLC 59870 0.0000
OR Solar 2, LLC 61200 0.0000
Brush Solar Center 61844 0.0000
Baker City Solar 61854 0.0000
Morgan Solar Center 61855 0.0000
Vale Solar Center 61856 0.0000
Ontario Solar Center 61860 0.0000
Techren Solar III LLC 61931 0.0000
Techren Solar IV LLC 61932 0.0000
Desert Harvest, LLC 62177 0.0000
Techren Solar V 62440 0.0000
Little Bear 3 62463 0.0000
Little Bear 4 62464 0.0000
Little Bear 5 62465 0.0000
Cove Mountain Solar 62469 0.0000
Cove Mountain Solar 2 62470 0.0000
Palmer Solar 62495 0.0000
Renew Solar ABC Sacramento LLC 62545 0.0000
Ekola Flats 62591 0.0000
Wheatridge Hybrid 62745 0.0000
Shelter Creek Condominiums Solar 62806 0.0000
Milford Solar 1 62812 0.0000
Mountain Breeze Wind, LLC 62840 0.0000
East Line Solar 62899 0.0000
Windsor Floating Solar 62902 0.0000
Orchard Windfarm 1, LLC 62935 0.0000
Rattlesnake Flat 62936 0.0000
South Peak Wind 62939 0.0000
Cheyenne Ridge Wind Farm 62952 0.0000
Syncarpha Taos 63123 0.0000
Syncarpha Questa 63125 0.0000
Roundhouse Wind Energy Project 63133 0.0000
Skookumchuck Wind Facility 63205 0.0000
Duus Solar, LLC 63330 0.0000
Firwood Solar, LLC 63331 0.0000
Mtn. Solar 3 CSG 63379 0.0000
IOS II-LAX9 63414 0.0000
Sierra Pacific Industries (2042-RD) 63416 0.0000
DGS Wasco State Prison 63418 0.0000
DGS Central California Womens Facility 63419 0.0000
Fresno Bullard High School Hybrid 63420 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Fresno Hoover High School Hybrid 63421 0.0000
Fresno Sunnyside High School Hybrid 63422 0.0000
Corriedale Wind Energy 63436 0.0000
St Louis Solar 63456 0.0000
Pika Solar 63462 0.0000
Brush Creek Solar 63464 0.0000
Minke Solar 63465 0.0000
Drift Creek Solar 63466 0.0000
Bighorn Solar 63467 0.0000
Alcalde Solar Array 63477 0.0000
Walnut Unified School District Walnut HS
Hybrid 63510 0.0000
Lafayette 2 - Internal Services Dept 63527 0.0000
Chevron - Lost Hills Hybrid 63545 0.0000
Lafayette 2 - MLK Jr. Hospital (MLK) 63623 0.0000
Fort Rock I 63636 0.0000
Dunn Road Solar 63642 0.0000
Mt Hope Solar 63663 0.0000
Williams Acres Solar 63664 0.0000
River Valley Solar 63665 0.0000
Oak Leaf Solar XXXIII LLC (Lantz) 63681 0.0000
Rawhide Prairie Solar Hybrid 63722 0.0000
Platteville Solar CSG, LLC 63753 0.0000
Kroger La Habra 63758 0.0000
Ballenger Road Solar A 63759 0.0000
Soscol Ferry Solar 63761 0.0000
Silveira Ranch Road Solar 63762 0.0000
Suntex Solar, LLC 63778 0.0000
Rock Garden Solar, LLC 63779 0.0000
Alkali Solar, LLC 63795 0.0000
West Hines Solar I, LLC 63796 0.0000
Bronco Plains Wind, LLC 63803 0.0000
Golden Field Solar III, LLC 63859 0.0000
Encino Solar Energy Center 63860 0.0000
Turquoise Nevada, LLC 63906 0.0000
SulusSolar17 63908 0.0000
Cedar Springs I 63914 0.0000
Cedar Springs II 63915 0.0000
Cedar Springs III 63916 0.0000
Riley 63925 0.0000
Fort Rock IV 63926 0.0000
Titan Solar 1 (CA) 63932 0.0000
Palmer Creek Solar, LLC 63956 0.0000
Day Hill Solar, LLC 63957 0.0000
SSD Marion 3, LLC 63958 0.0000
Version: May 2022
SSD Marion 5, LLC 63959 0.0000
SSD Marion 6, LLC 63960 0.0000
SSD Clackamas 1, LLC 63961 0.0000
SSD Clackamas 4, LLC 63962 0.0000
SSD Clackamas 7, LLC 63963 0.0000
SSD Marion 1, LLC 63964 0.0000
SulusSolar35 63969 0.0000
FTF-PackingShed 63993 0.0000
Firebaugh-CCS-PV-1 63994 0.0000
SulusSolar28 64007 0.0000
Alden Solar CSG LLC 64021 0.0000
Monte Vista Solar 2 CSG, LLC 64024 0.0000
Fremont CO 1, LLC 64031 0.0000
GreenparkSolar 64033 0.0000
SulusSolar25 64034 0.0000
SulusSolar29 64048 0.0000
Orchard Windfarm 2, LLC 64051 0.0000
Orchard Windfarm 3, LLC 64052 0.0000
Orchard Windfarm 4, LLC 64053 0.0000
Wonderful Orchards - New Columbia 64055 0.0000
Wheatridge 1 64057 0.0000
Tesla Reno GigaFactory 64098 0.0000
Desert Harvest II LLC 64103 0.0000
James W. Broderick Hydropower Plant 64123 0.0000
SR Rattlesnake 64152 0.0000
Horn Rapids Solar, Storage and Training 64198 0.0000
Jack's Solar Garden 64200 0.0000
Wonderful Orchards - Belridge 64221 0.0000
Las Virgenes 64264 0.0000
Rock Creek 2 CSG 64265 0.0000
Valencia 2 64267 0.0000
Dissigno Healdsburg FPV, LLC 64308 0.0000
Two Dot Wind Broadview East LLC 64332 0.0000
Western Meadowlark Solar SCS NE 1, LLC 64365 0.0000
Tranquillity ID 64376 0.0000
Firestone Walker Brewery - Phase 1 64391 0.0000
Mesa Carport PV 64404 0.0000
Big Bear 64418 0.0000
Department of Justice 64517 0.0000
CA Institute for Women 64518 0.0000
Centinela State Prison 64519 0.0000
Calipatria State Prison 64521 0.0000
Atascadero State Hospital 64523 0.0000
Broadway 2 - UC Riverside 64579 0.0000
Broadway 2 - Tucson Phase II 64580 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Afton Generating Station 55210 0.4386
Big Sky Dairy Digester 57393 0.5087
Raft River Geothermal - GE 1 56317 0.0000
Rock Creek Dairy (New Energy One) [Digester
Gas] 58142 0.0024
Whitegrass No. 1 [Geothermal] 63001 0.0000
Tulare BioMAT Fuel Cell 61846 0.4123
Lockheed Martin Corporation - Sunnyvale 57808 4.5401
MAGTFTC MCAGCC Twentynine Palms 58914 0.2626
Hudson Ranch Power I - Geothermal 57475 0.0558
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 58223 0.3999
Calpine - Yuba City Energy Center (Gilroy
Energy Center, LLC) 55813 0.6189
Stanton Energy Reliability Center 60698 0.5812
Calpine - Creed Energy Center, LLC 55625 0.1342
Calpine - Goose Haven Energy Center, Peaker 10350 0.1283 Still Water Power 64141 0.7154
Diamond H Dairy Power 64622 1.1111
AES Alamitos Energy, LLC 62115 0.3973
AES Huntington Beach, LLC 62116 0.3973
Red Cloud Wind 63981 0.0000
Altwind 1 - Altwind 1 P1 0.0000
Altwind 2 - Altwind 2 P2 0.0000
Altwind 3 - Altwind 3 P3 0.0000
Desert Winds I - Desert Winds I P4 0.0000
Desert Winds II Pwr Purch Trst - Desert Winds II
Pwr Purch Trst P5 0.0000
Desert Winds III - Desert Winds III P6 0.0000
San Gorgonio Altwind - San Gorgonio Altwind P7 0.0000
San Gorgonio East - San Gorgonio East P8 0.0000
1122-11423 Vanowen - FITS1042 - 11423
Vanowen St P9 0.0000
1160-2645 La Cienega Ave - FITS1043 - 2645 LA
CIENEGA P10 0.0000
1254-10261 Glenoaks Blvd - FITS1039 - 10261
Glenoaks Blvd P11 0.0000
1425-12360 Foothill Blvd - FITS1041 - 12360
FOOTHILL BL P12 0.0000
14539 Blythe Solar PV - FITS1011 - 14539
Blythe St P13 0.0000
21717 Nordhoff - FiTS1007 - 21717 Nordhoff St P14 0.0000 Version: May 2022
8011-658 Venice Blvd. - FITS 1044 658 Venice
Blvd P15 0.0000
Bathke Broadway Properties - FiTS1001 - 2515
S Broadway P16 0.0000
Capelin Distribution Center - FiTS1006 - 20000 S
Western Ave P17 0.0000
Cathay LA - Solar Project - FiTS1021 - 1501 N
Main P18 0.0000
Chatsmouth Solar Project 1 - FiTS1002 - 9640
Owensmouth P19 0.0000
DS2 Solar FiT Project - FiTS1089 - 1115-1129 S
Boyle Avenue P20 0.0000
DS3 Solar FiT Project - FiTS1090 - 1103-1109 S
Boyle Avenue P21 0.0000
Figueroa & Ave 61 Center - FiTS1028 - 6100
North Figueroa St P22 0.0000
FITS1017 - 11115 Laurel Canyon Blvd - FITS1017
- 11115 Laurel Canyon Blvd P23 0.0000
Harbor Regional Park Ground Mount Solar
Array - FITS1085 - 1581 West L Street P24 0.0000
KSI Solar Whiteman - FITS1019 - 10500 Airpark
Way P25 0.0000
LAX Logistic Industrial Center - FiTD1012 -
5343/5353 Imperial Hwy P26 0.0000
Layline Distribution Center - FiTS1003 - 1000 W
Francisco St P27 0.0000
Mastercraft 96.64kW Solar PV - FITS1020 -
7463 Varna P28 0.0000
M-C Investments 4558 Brazil - FITS1065-4558
Brazil P29 0.0000
North Figueroa & Ave. 58-59 Center - FITS1071-
5801 N. Figueroa P30 0.0000
Oxen Solar I - FiTD1019 - 11313 Oxnard St. P31 0.0000
Prairie Solar I - FiTS1025 - 20001 W Prairie P32 0.0000 Prairie Solar II - FiTS1026 - 19809 W Prairie P33 0.0000 Saf Keep Melrose - FITS1016 - 4996 Melrose
Ave P34 0.0000
Saf Keep San Fernando - FITS1008 - 2840 San
Fernando Rd P35 0.0000
Shri Ji Ram Solar FIT Project - FITS1047 - 1933
W 60TH ST P36 0.0000
SOL #1235 LOS ANGELES - FITS1040 -
6005/6033 S CENTRAL AV P37 0.0000
Sunstarter Solar CXVI - FiTS1027 - 3650 E
Olympic Blvd P38 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Tangen Building - FITS1009 - 11205 S Broadway
Place P39 0.0000
Van Nuys Air - Hannah Solar - FiTD1011 - 7855
Hayvenhurst Ave P40 0.0000
Aeroplex - FITS1100 - 16143 Waterman Dr P41 0.0000
Aeroplex 2 - FITS1099 - 7943 -7949 Woodley
Ave P42 0.0000
Flight Building 1 - FITS1049 - 16665 16667
Arminta St P43 0.0000
Flight Building 6 - FITS1054 - 16543 16545
Arminta St P44 0.0000
Flight Building 7 - FITS1055 - 7901 7915 7929
Ruffner Ave P45 0.0000
Flight Building 8 - FITS1056 - 16638 Arminta St P46 0.0000 Flight Building 10 - FITS1058 - 16604 16608
Arminta St P47 0.0000
Van Nuys Air - 16620 Stagg St - FITS1048 -
16620 Stagg St P48 0.0000
Flight Building 2 P49 0.0000
Flight Building 3 - FITS1051 - 16637 16639
Arminta St P50 0.0000
Flight Building 4 - FITS1052 - 16625 Arminta St P51 0.0000 Flight Building 5 - FITS1053 - 16611 16615
Arminta St P52 0.0000
Foothill - FITS1087 - 7061 Foothill Blvd P53 0.0000
13207 Bradley Avenue - FITS1098 - 13207
Bradley Avenue P54 0.0000
Flight Building 11 - FITS1059 - 16554 16556
Arminta St P55 0.0000
Flight Building 12 - FITS1060 - 16540 16542
Arminta St P56 0.0000
Flight Building 13 - FITS1061 - 16508-16526
Arminta St P57 0.0000
Sun Valley 2 - FITS1101 - 11063 Pendleton Ave P58 0.0000 BJE Solar FiT Project II - FITS1083 - 12607
Sherman Way P59 0.0000
Flight Building 9 - FITS1057 - 16626 Arminta St P60 0.0000 Valley Solar 1 - FITS1094 - 9340 9400 Penfield
Ave P61 0.0000
Valley Solar 5 - FITS1093 - 9330 Winnetka Ave
N P62 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Valley Solar 6 - FITS1095 - 19840 19860
Nordhoff Pl P63 0.0000
BJE Solar FiT Project - FITS1084 - 7230 Bellaire
Avenue P64 0.0000
WE Solar FiT Project - FITS1082 - 11308
Penrose St P65 0.0000
US Customhouse - BP 14-011G - 300 S Ferry St P66 0.0000 Berths 153 154-155 - BP14-009F - 804 S Pier A
St P67 0.0000
Ardagh Cannery Building 8 - BP14-011D 936 S
Barracuda St P68 0.0000
Napa FIT - FITS1073 - 16901-16915 Napa St P69 0.0000
Flight Building 14 - FITS1062 - 7861 Ruffner
Avenue 16710 Stagg St P70 0.0000
Woodman and Nordhoff Center - FITS1067 -
9011-9079 Woodman Ave P71 0.0000
De Soto - FITS1103 - 9401 De Soto Ave P72 0.0000
LA Convention Center Carport Solar P73 0.0000
Main St - General Service HQ - Bldg 13 Rooftop
Solar P74 0.0000
Metro Center - Parking Garage Rooftop Solar P75 0.0000
Owens Dry Lake Solar Demonstration - Owens
Lake Solar Demo P76 0.0000
Valley Generating Station - Admin Bldg Canopy
Solar P77 0.0000
Harbor Generating Station - HGS Warehouse
Solar P78 0.0000
Solar Rooftops Program - Group 1 P79 0.0000
Haiwee Power Plant - Haiwee Power Plant HAI1 P80 0.0000 Haiwee Power Plant - Haiwee Power Plant HAI2 P81 0.0000 AT&T Park Solar Arrays P82 0.0000
SF Service Center Solar Array 1 P83 0.0000
SF Service Center Solar Array 2 P84 0.0000
CHARCOAL RAVINE P85 0.0000
HAT CREEK HEREFORD RANCH P86 0.0000
JAMES B. PETER P87 0.0000
JAMES CRANE HYDRO P88 0.0000
JOHN NEERHOUT JR. P89 0.0000
KINGS RIVER HYDRO CO. P90 0.0000
LOFTON RANCH P91 0.0000
ORANGE COVE IRRIGATION DIST. P92 0.0000
Version: May 2022
ROCK CREEK WATER DISTRICT P93 0.0000
SCHAADS HYDRO P94 0.0000
SWISS AMERICA P95 0.0000
2103 HILL PRISTINE SUN LLC P96 0.0000
2105 HART (Oroville Solar) P97 0.0000
2154 Foote (Oroville Solar) P98 0.0000
AMERICAN ENERGY, INC. (SAN LUIS BYPASS) P99 0.0000
AMERICAN ENERGY, INC. (WOLFSEN BYPASS ) P100 0.0000
APEX 646-460 P101 0.0000
BROWNS VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT P102 0.0000
BUCKEYE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT P103 0.0000
CALAVERAS PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT #1 P104 0.0000
CALAVERAS PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT #2 P105 0.0000
CALAVERAS PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT #3 P106 0.0000
DIGGER CREEK RANCH P107 0.0000
Goose Valley Hydro (SB32) P108 0.0000
GreenLight- Peacock Solar Project P109 0.0000
JACKSON VALLEY IRRIGATION DIST P110 0.0000
Lassen Station Hydro P111 0.0000
MADERA CANAL (1174 + 84) P112 0.0000
Madera Canal (1923) P113 0.0000
MADERA CANAL STATION 1302 P114 0.0000
Mathew's Dam Hydro P115 0.0000
MCFADDEN HYDROELECTRIC FACILITY P116 0.0000
Mill Sulphur Creek Project P117 0.0000
NEVADA IRRIGATION DISTRICT NORTH COMBIE P118 0.0000
PCWA – Lincoln Metering and Hydroelectric
Station P119 0.0000
Pristine Sun- 2192 Ramirez P120 0.0000
Pristine Sun Alvares 2041 P121 0.0000
Pristine Sun Buzzelle P122 0.0000
Pristine Sun Christensen P123 0.0000
Pristine Sun Cotton 2096 P124 0.0000
PRISTINE SUN FITZJARRELL P125 0.0000
Pristine Sun Jardine P126 0.0000
PRISTINE SUN JARVIS P127 0.0000
Pristine Sun Rogers P128 0.0000
Pristine Sun Scherz P129 0.0000
Pristine Sun Smotherman P130 0.0000
Pristine Sun Stroing P131 0.0000
ROCK CREEK L.P. P132 0.0000
Salmon Creek Hydroelectric Project P133 0.0000
Version: May 2022
SANTA MARIA II LFG POWER PLANT P134 0.0000
SHAMROCK UTILITIES (CEDAR FLAT) P135 0.0000
SHAMROCK UTILITIES (CLOVER LEAF) P136 0.0000
SIERRA GREEN ENERGY P137 0.0000
SILVER SPRINGS P138 0.0000
Sirius Solar P139 0.0000
TUNNEL HILL HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT P140 0.0000
Twin Valley Hydro P141 0.0000
Water Wheel Ranch P142 0.0000
YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY (Mini Hydro) P143 0.0000
GRASSHOPPER FLAT P144 0.0000
Sutter's Mill P145 0.0000
Hayward Paul Luckey P146 0.0000
J Bar 9 Ranch, Inc. (LU) P147 0.0000
West Side P148 0.0000
Cape Scott Wind P149 0.0000
Dokie Wind P150 0.0000
Meikle Wind P151 0.0000
Moose Lake Wind P152 0.0000
Pennask Wind Farm P153 0.0000
Quality Wind P154 0.0000
FIT - McClellan Park P155 0.0000
Sutter's Landing Solar P156 0.0000
SMUD PV - Hedge Substation PV Plant (Hedge
units 1-4) P157 0.0000
Cal Expo P158 0.0000
Utility Operations Center P159 0.0000
Shinish Creek Wind Farm P160 0.0000
TerraGen Mojave Wind Farms, LLC - Morwind P161 0.0000
CITY OF WATSONVILLE P162 1.1111
BLAKE'S LANDING FARMS, INC. (Biogas) P163 1.1111
Clover Flat LFG P164 1.1111
OPEN SKY DAIRY DIGESTER #2 P165 1.1111
SAN LUIS OBISPO AD (aka HZIU Kompogas) P166 1.1111
VERWEY MADERA DAIRY DIGESTER 2 (NEW) P167 1.1111
ABEC Bidart-Stockdale LLC P168 1.1111
Still Water Power P169 1.1111
Van Warmerdam Dairy Digester P170 1.1111
New Hope Diary Digester P171 1.1111
Van Steyn P172 1.1111
Fiscalini Farms P173 1.1111
Version: May 2022
1080 CHESTNUT CORP. P174 0.3973
AIRPORT CLUB P175 0.3973
ARDEN WOOD BENEVOLENT ASSOC. P176 0.3973
CITY OF WATSONVILLE P177 0.3973
GREATER VALLEJO RECREATION DISTRICT P178 0.3973
HAYWARD AREA REC & PARK DIST. P179 0.3973
NIHONMACHI TERRACE P180 0.3973
ORINDA SENIOR VILLAGE P181 0.3973
SATELLITE SENIOR HOMES P182 0.3973
UC Davis Medical Center P183 0.3973
Elk Grove Milling P184 0.3973
GFP Ethanol, LLC dba Calgren Renew Fuels
(Pixley Cogen Partners, LLC) P185 0.3973
Techni-Cast Corp P186 0.3973
Aligned Microgrid P187 0.7968
CSE Arizona Facility P188 0.7208
Gila River Power Station - Block 1 P190 0.4056
Gila River Power Station - Block 4 P193 0.4212
La Rosita Power Project (MEX) P194 0.4144
MCAS Yuma Microgrid MCGX02 P195 0.7968
Stotz Southern Generation P197 0.7208
Termoelectrica de Mexicali (MEX) P198 0.3851
26-foot Drop Small Hydro P199 0.0000
Blackspring Ridge 1A Wind Project (CAN) P200 0.0000
Blackspring Ridge 1B Wind Project (CAN) P201 0.0000
Bridge River 1 Hydroelectric Generation Facility
(CAN) P202 0.0000
Bridge River 2 Hydroelectric Generation Facility
(CAN) P203 0.0000
Cheakamus Hydroelectric Generation Facility
(CAN) P204 0.0000
Energía Sierra Juárez Wind Farm (MEX) P205 0.0000
G.M. Shrum Hydroelectric Generation Facility
(CAN) P206 0.0000
Grand View 5 East P207 0.0000
Halkirk I Wind Project (CAN) P208 0.0000
Kootenay Canal Hydroelectric Generation
Facility (CAN) P209 0.0000
Mica Hydroelectric Generation Facility (CAN) P210 0.0000 Peace Canyon Hydroelectric Generation Facility
(CAN) P211 0.0000
Revelstoke Hydroelectric Generation Facility
(CAN) P212 0.0000
Version: May 2022
Seven Mile Hydroelectric Generation Facility
(CAN) P213 0.0000
Utility Built Solar (LADWP) P214 0.0000
FIT Solar P215 0.0000
IP Malbec P216 0.0000
Geo Solar 1 - Clearlake P217 0.0000
Geo Solar 2- Middletown P218 0.0000
BART Antioch Station JB-94525154 P219 0.0000
BART Lafayette Station JB-94525155 P220 0.0000
BART Warm Springs Station JB-94512464 P221 0.0000
City of Rancho Cucamonga - City Hall P222 0.0000
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Animal Center
Shelter P223 0.0000
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Epicenter P224 0.0000
Penitencia Water Treatment Plant PV P225 0.0000
Santa Teresa Water Treatment Plant PV P226 0.0000
Sonoma Valley Treatment Plant PV P227 0.0000
275 Cambridge Ave. Parking Garage - 275
Cambridge Garage P228 0.0000
445 Bryant St. Parking Garage - 445 Bryant St.

Roseville City CouncilSeptember 7, 2022

Roseville City Council
September 7, 2022