Agenda — Roseville City Council, September 20, 2023 (part 7 of 8)

therefore, the resulting physical impacts to various natural resources would not significantly differ from those identified in the prior environmental documents.

Thus, the impacts of the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments fall within the scope of the impacts already analyzed in the prior environmental documents.

Mitigation Measures: None.

Conclusion: The Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not result in a new significant impact or significant impacts that are substantially more severe than those analyzed in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND and modified by the various relevant addenda. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164, subdivision (a), the City finds that “none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred” regarding population and housing.

XV. Public Services
For the environmental setting, refer to Sections 4.11.1-2, 4.11.2-2, 4.11.3-2, 4.11.4-2, and 4.11.5-2 of the SVSP EIR.

Would the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services:

4.11-14; Impact

4.11-2
WSP MND, pp.
34–36
No No No Yes
Police protection?
Final EIR, pp.

4.11-4 to 4.11-
6; Impact

4.11.1 WSP MND, pp.
34–36
No No No No
Schools?
Final EIR, pp.

4.11-26 to 4.11-
28; Impact

4.11.3 WSP MND, pp.
34–36
No No No Yes
COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 41 of 54 ends

Parks?
Final EIR, pp.

4.11-37 to 4.11-
39; Impact

4.11.5 WSP MND, pp.
34–36
No No No No
Other public facilities?
Final EIR, pp.

4.11-31 to 4.11-
32; Impact

4.11.4 WSP MND, pp.
34–36
No No No No
Discussion of Checklist Answers:

Public Services were adequately addressed in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND.19 The SVSP EIR concluded that development of the SVSP area would not result in significant impacts to law enforcement services, fire services, library services, or parks and recreation facilities. The SVSP EIR concluded, however, that school transportation within the SVSP area could result in potentially significant impacts.

The Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not significantly alter the prior public service impact conclusions.

For fire protection infrastructure, existing City codes and regulations require adequate water pressure in the water lines, and construction must comply with the Uniform Fire and Building Codes used by the City of Roseville.

The Applicant is required to pay a fire service construction fee, which is used for purchasing capital facilities for the City Fire Department. For police and fire protection services, properties in the SVSP provide funding via the Municipal Services Community Facilities District (CFD), CFD No. 3, in addition to funding generated by sales taxes and property taxes resulting from development that will add revenue to the General Fund, which provides funding for those police and fire services. For park maintenance (among other public services), the Applicant will be required to provide funding via Community Facilities District No. 2, which provides funding for park maintenance (and other public services). For other public facilities, the SVSP area would be adequately served by existing libraries, and the City charges fees for end-users for other services, such as garbage and green waste collection, in order to fund those services.

For schools, the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments involve an increase in residential units within the SVSP area and, therefore, a potential slight increase in students. Consistent with City policy, the original SVSP landowners were required under the SVSP Development Agreements to enter into mutual benefit impact fee agreements with the Roseville City School District, Center Joint Unified School District, and the Roseville Joint Unified High School District to fully mitigate school impacts from development in the SVSP. Such mutual benefit impact fee agreements with the respective school districts were recorded against all SVSP properties. As a result, any increase in students associated with the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not translate into a more severe environmental impact than what was anticipated in the SVSP EIR (inclusive of the Westbrook MND).

Regarding parks, the Applicant would be required to pay the Citywide Park Fee and Neighborhood Park Fee, established in 1989 by Chapter 4.38 of the Roseville Municipal Code. These fees are collected from all new residential dwelling units within the Roseville City limits and are adjusted every year based on the inflation rate for construction costs. The Citywide Park Fee is allocated for large-scale active recreation facilities intended to serve the entire City and is typically located within identified Citywide parks. The Applicant would also be required to pay the Neighborhood Park Fee to fund construction of neighborhood parkland in the SVSP. Payment of these 19 See also WSP MND 1st Addendum, p. 25; SVSP EIR 1st Addendum, pp. 23–24.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 42 of 54 ends

fees would ensure that there would be no new or more severe significant impacts to existing parks compared with the impacts identified in the prior environmental documents. Importantly, the Applicant intends to develop the area encompassed by Parcel WB-52 as park and recreation space to serve current and future housing developments on Parcels WB-30, WB-31, and WB-16, and the Applicant will be required to pay applicable inlieu fees. Lastly, development on the affected parcels would comply with the applicable SVSP EIR mitigation measure, ensuring that there would be no new or more severe significant park impacts compared with the impacts identified in the prior environmental documents.

Thus, the public service impacts of the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments fall within the scope of the impacts already analyzed in the prior environmental documents.

Mitigation Measures: The following mitigation measure applies to development on the affected parcels:
• SVSP EIR MM 4.11.3-2: Safe routes to school.

Conclusion: With implementation of the applicable mitigation measure, the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not result in a new significant impact or significant impacts that are substantially more severe than those analyzed in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND and modified by the various relevant addenda.

Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164, subdivision (a), the City finds that “none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred” regarding public services.

XVI. Recreation
For the environmental setting, refer to Section 4.11.5-2 of the SVSP Final EIR.

Would the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments:

4.11-37 to 4.11-
39; Impact

4.11.5 WSP MND, p.
37 No No No No
b) Include recreational
facilities or require the
construction or expansion
of recreational facilities
which might have an
adverse physical effect
on the environment?
Final EIR, pp.

4.11-37 to 4.11-
39; Impact

4.11.5 WSP MND, p.
37 No No No No
COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 43 of 54 ends

Discussion of Checklist Answers:

Recreation was adequately addressed in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND.20 The SVSP EIR concluded that development of the SVSP area would not result in significant impacts related to increased demand for park facilities that would require recreation mitigation measures.

The Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not significantly alter the prior recreation impact conclusions. The prior environmental documents anticipated the construction of a neighborhood park in the Westbrook area, on Parcel WB-52.21 The Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would replace this public neighborhood park with comparable private park and recreation facilities, which would still serve the surrounding parcels (WB-30, WB31, and WB-16) and would result in impacts similar to those previously analyzed for Parcel WB-52. Moreover, the Applicant would pay in-lieu fees to offset the loss of public parkland on Parcel WB-52. The Applicant also would be required to pay the Citywide Park Fee and Neighborhood Park Fee, established in 1989 by Chapter

4.38 of the Roseville Municipal Code. These fees are collected from all new residential dwelling units within the Roseville City limits and are adjusted every year based on the inflation rate for construction costs. The Citywide Park Fee is allocated for large-scale active recreation facilities intended to serve the entire City and is typically located within identified City-wide parks. The Neighborhood Park Fee funds construction of neighborhood parkland in the SVSP. The payment of these fees would ensure that there would be no new or more severe significant impacts to existing parks compared with the impacts identified in the prior environmental documents.

As indicated above, because the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would still provide park recreation opportunities, as well as in-lieu public park fees, the conclusions from the prior environmental documents regarding park capacity would not change. Moreover, as discussed elsewhere in this Addendum, development of the private recreational facilities would comply with all applicable SVSP EIR mitigation measures addressing physical effects on the environment from construction, ensuring that there would be no new or more severe significant recreation impacts compared with the impacts identified in the prior environmental documents.

Thus, the impacts of the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments fall within the scope of the impacts already analyzed in the prior environmental documents.

Mitigation Measures: None.

XVII. Transportation/Traffic
For the environmental setting, refer to Section 4.3.2 of the SVSP Final EIR. 20 See also WSP MND 1st Addendum, p. 26; SVSP EIR 1st Addendum, p. 24. 21 See SVSP, Chapter 7 (Public Services), p. 7-19, available online at: https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/ departments/development_services/planning/specific_plans_planning_areas/sierra_vista_specific_plan.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 44 of 54 ends

Would the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments:

4.3-53 to 4.3-
169; Impacts

4.3-1 to 4.3-24
WSP MND, pp.
38–46
No No No Yes
b) Conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
Not Addressed N/A N/A N/A N/A
c) Substantially increase
hazards due to a
geometric design feature
(for example, sharp
curves or dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible uses (for
example, farm
equipment)?
Final EIR, pp.

4.3-53 to 4.3-
169; Impacts

4.3-1 to 4.3-24
WSP MND, pp.
38–46
No No No No
d) Result in inadequate
emergency access?
Final EIR, pp.

4.10-27 to 4.10-
28, 4.11-11 to

4.11-14;
Impacts 4.10-2,

4.11-2
WSP MND, pp.
38–46
No No No No
Discussion of Checklist Answers:

Transportation and traffic were adequately addressed in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND.22 The SVSP EIR identified various intersections and roadways that could potentially be impacted by the development of the SVSP area. The SVSP EIR concluded that some of these would not be significantly impacted, some would be impacted but mitigation measures would reduce these impacts to a less-than-significant level, and others would experience a significant and unavoidable impact, due to either a lack of feasible mitigation measures or lack of City authority to require mitigation outside of its jurisdiction. Where the SVSP EIR determined that specific roadway improvements within the City’s jurisdiction could mitigate significant impacts, it identified mitigation measures requiring development of the SVSP area to include contributions to the City’s Capital Improvement Program to help fund such improvements. For improvements outside of the City’s jurisdiction, the SVSP EIR 22 See also WSP MND 1st Addendum, pp. 27–28; SVSP EIR 1st Addendum, pp. 25–26.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 45 of 54 ends

identified mitigation measures requiring the City to negotiate with outside agencies to reach a fee agreement under which the development could similarly help fund improvements outside of the City.

The Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not significantly alter the prior transportation and traffic impact conclusions. All of the transportation and traffic impacts identified in the prior environmental documents have already occurred and all associated mitigation measures have been implemented. In addition, Fehr & Peers prepared a transportation evaluation memorandum for the SVSP area and the entirety of the Proposed Project (see Attachment B). Fehr & Peers concluded that although the VMT in and around that SVSP area would marginally increase (by 0.3 percent),23 the Proposed Project would result in a net decrease of approximately 2,376 VMT for both the SVSP and COMP areas.24 Thus, the marginal increase in VMT within the SVSP area is more than offset by the VMT decrease within the COMP area, from which an obligation to provided additional affordable housing within the SVSP would be transferred. Additionally, the slight VMT increase anticipated within the SVSP area is not as large as might be expected with the proposed density increases, largely because 355 of the units proposed on the affected parcels would be restricted for use by senior citizens—a restriction that generally results in fewer and shorter vehicle trips per unit.

Additionally, the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would neither introduce any hazards resulting from circulation design nor present any significant safety risks associated with emergency access as all affected parcels would be developed according to City and SVSP-specific design criteria and all applicable state standards associated with emergency access.

Thus, the transportation and traffic impacts of the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments fall within the scope of the impacts already analyzed in the prior environmental documents.

Mitigation Measures: None.

XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources
For the environmental setting, refer to Section 4.9.2 of the SVSP Final EIR.

Would the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural 23 The Proposed Project would also modestly increase the number of daily vehicle trips, which is not relevant to VMT analysis but rather is relevant to analysis of level of service (LOS), which is a factor that is no longer a CEQA issue. As of December 28, 2018, “automobile delay, as described solely by [LOS] or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment” under CEQA, except for roadway capacity projects (Citizens for Positive Growth & Preservation v. City of Sacramento (2019) 43 Cal.App.5th 609, 625−626). 24 A VMT analysis is included here for informational purposes; however, its inclusion in this Addendum is not required under CEQA because it was not required or included in the SVSP EIR or WSP MND. CEQA’s VMT analysis requirement, which went into effect on July 1, 2020, only applies to documents released to the public after that date. (See CEQA Guidelines, section 15064.3, subd. (c).) Here, the SVSP EIR and the WSP MND, on which this Addendum primarily relies, were prepared in 2010 and 2012, respectively; thus, a VMT analysis was not required in either of those documents. Nor is it required in this Addendum. (Olen Properties Corp. v. City of Newport Beach (2023) case no. G061427; 2023 WL 4399077, currently awaiting formal citation.)
COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 46 of 54 ends

landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

4.9-17 to 4.9-
21, 4.9-23 to

4.9-25; Impacts

4.9-1, 4.9-2,

4.9-4
WSP MND, pp.
21–22
No No No Yes
(ii) A resource
determined by the
lead agency, in its
discretion and
supported by
substantial evidence,
to be significant
pursuant to criteria
set forth in
subdivision (c) of
Public Resources
Code Section
5024.1. In applying
the criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources
Code Section
5024.1, the lead
agency shall
consider the
significance of the
resource to a
California Native
American tribe.

Final EIR, pp.

4.9-17 to 4.9-
21, 4.9-23 to

4.9-25; Impacts

4.9-1, 4.9-2,

4.9-4
WSP MND, pp.
21–22
No No No Yes
Discussion of Checklist Answers:

After the SVSP EIR was certified, the Legislature enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 52 (2014), which requires specific consideration of impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources resulting from projects subject to CEQA review. Thus, the SVSP EIR (inclusive of the WSP MND) did not specifically address impacts to tribal cultural resource resulting from development of the SVSP area. Instead, these impacts were addressed as part of the general cultural resources analysis, as was common practice prior to AB 52. As discussed above, the SVSP EIR concluded that, COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 47 of 54 ends

with mitigation, development in the SVSP area would not result in significant impacts to cultural resources, inclusive of all known Tribal Cultural Resources in the area of potential effect at that time.

Since the previous environmental documents have been prepared, no Tribal Cultural Resources have been identified in the SVSP area. Nor do the City or Applicant have knowledge of any particular Tribal Cultural Resources on or near the affected parcels. However, it is possible that construction activities on the affected parcels could uncover currently unknown Tribal Cultural Resources.

As discussed above in the Description of the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments and Section V, Cultural Resources, the affected parcels have been heavily disturbed over a period of years, with no cultural resources or Tribal Cultural Resources being inadvertently discovered in the process. California Public Resources Code section 15064.5 requires that “[w]hen an initial study identifies the existence of, or the probable likelihood of, Native American Remains within a project, a lead agency shall work with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC as provided in Public Resources Code section 5097.98. The applicant may develop a plan for treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any items associated with Native American Burials with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC.” Here, however, no previously certified or adopted environmental review, study, or site survey has identified any Tribal Cultural Resources. The proposed land use changes would not introduce development to properties not already planned for development, and thus would not disturb new or different Tribal Cultural Resources beyond those already within the development footprint. Nevertheless, compliance with mitigation required in the SVSP EIR intended to protect unknown cultural resources (inclusive of Tribal Cultural Resources), such as “any amount of bone or shell, artifacts, human remains,” etc., will ensure that any development on the affected parcels would not result in new impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources or more severe impacts to those same resources than impacts identified in the prior environmental documents.

Thus, the Tribal Cultural Resource impacts of the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments fall within the scope of the impacts already analyzed in the prior environmental documents.

Mitigation Measures: The following mitigation measures apply to development on the affected parcels:
• SVSP EIR MM 4.9-1: Cease work and consult with a qualified archaeologist. • SVSP EIR MM 4.9-5: Conduct appropriate off-site studies.

Conclusion: With implementation of the applicable mitigation measures, the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not result in a new significant impact or significant impacts that are substantially more severe than those analyzed in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND and modified by the various relevant addenda.

XIX. Utilities and Service Systems
For the environmental setting, refer to Sections 4.12.1.2, 4.12.2.2, 4.12.3.2, 4.12.4.2, and 4.12.5.2 of the SVSP Final EIR.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 48 of 54 ends

Would the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments:

4.12.1-70 to

4.12.1-74,

4.12.2-9 to

4.12.2-14,

4.12.3-13 to

4.12.3-19,

4.12.5-7 to

4.12.5-15, 4.13-
22 to 4.13-24;
Impacts 4.12.1-
4, 4.12.1-5,

4.12.2-1,

4.12.3-1,

4.12.3-2,

4.12.5-1 to

4.12.5-3, 4.13-2
WSP MND, pp.
46–51
No No No Yes
b) Have sufficient water
supplies available to
serve the project and
reasonably foreseeable
future development
during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
Final EIR, pp.

4.12.1-47 to

4.12.1-65,

4.12.2-9 to

4.12.2-14;
Impacts 4.12.1-
1, 4.12.1-2,

4.12.2-1
WSP MND, pp.
46–51
No No No Yes
c) Result in a determination
by the wastewater
treatment provider which
serves or may serve the
project that it has
adequate capacity to
serve the project’s
projected demand in
addition to the provider’s
existing commitments?
Final EIR, pp.

4.12.3-13 to

4.12.3-20;
Impacts 4.12.3-
1, 4.12.3-2
WSP MND, pp.
46–51
No No No Yes
COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 49 of 54 ends

d) Generate solid waste in
excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of
the capacity of local
infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste
reduction goals?
Final EIR, pp.

4.12.4-9 to

4.12.4-15;
Impacts 4.12.4-
1 to 4.12.4-4
WSP MND, pp.
46–51
No No No Yes
e) Comply with federal,
state, and local
management and
reduction statutes and
regulations related to
solid waste?
Final EIR, pp.

4.12.4-9 to

4.12.4-11,

4.12.4-14 to

4.12.4-15;
Impacts 4.12.1-
1, 4.12.1-4
WSP MND, pp.
46–51
No No No Yes
Discussion of Checklist Answers:

Utilities and services systems were adequately addressed in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND.25 With respect to water, the SVSP EIR concluded that development of the SVSP area would not result in significant impacts related to water supply, treatment, and distribution. With respect to wastewater, the SVSP EIR concluded that development of the SVSP area would result in potentially significant impacts related to wastewater treatment capacity. The SVSP EIR identified mitigation measures to mitigate these impacts. With respect to energy (electricity and natural gas) and telecommunications, the SVSP EIR concluded that development of the SVSP area would not result in any significant impacts. Finally, with respect to solid waste, the SVSP EIR concluded that development of the SVSP area would increase demand for landfill services and require a landfill expansion. The SVSP EIR identified a mitigation measure to reduce this impact, but determined that it would remain significant and unavoidable. Additionally, the SVSP EIR concluded that construction within the SVSP EIR would generate debris and that this would be a potentially significant impact, but identified a mitigation measure to reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level.

The Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not significantly alter the prior utilities and service system impact conclusions. The proposed land use changes would not introduce development or development types onto parcels not already planned for residential development. Additionally, the utility providers that would serve future residents on the affected parcels have capacity for the proposed development.

Water in the City of Roseville comes primarily from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation via Folsom Lake, but the City also maintains contracts with the Placer County Water Agency to obtain additional water as needed (see GP EIR, p. 2-33). Through these surface water sources, the City’s is able to adequately supply water, and will continue to be able to adequately supply water into the foreseeable future, as the City’s projected water use in 2040 is 50,907 AFY and it will have the capacity to provide 66,000 AFY (see GP EIR, p. 2-34). Additionally, the City maintains several groundwater wells that, if necessary, can deliver up to 17,000 AFY supplemental water to the City (see GP EIR, p. 2-34). Thus, the City has more than enough water for development on the affected parcels, inclusive of the units added via density bonus.

Wastewater, which may marginally increase as a result of Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments, would be conveyed to the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWT), which has capacity to serve the affected parcels. 25 See also WSP MND 1st Addendum, pp. 29–31; SVSP EIR 1st Addendum, pp. 27–28.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 50 of 54 ends

Nevertheless, development on the affected parcels would need to comply with the applicable wastewater mitigation measure, which requires confirmation prior to obtaining a building permit that the PGWT has capacity to serve the development and/or will be timely expanded to accommodate total wastewater flow. Stormwater flow and drainage for all development would comply with all applicable federal, state and local requirements and would not be expected to increase as a result of the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments (high-density residential land uses consist of approximately 65 percent impervious surfaces, resulting in reduced flows as more stormwater can absorbed onsite [see Attachment C]). For a discussion on the energy efficiency requirements and incentives for development on the affected parcels, refer to Section VI.

Additionally, since the SVSP EIR was certified, the Western Placer Waste Management Authority has approved the expansion of the Western Regional Sanitary Landfill, which would serve the affected parcels. As a result, the lifespan of the landfill will be extended through 2110. While they would remain significant and unavoidable, impacts related to landfill capacity from the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would be reduced due to the landfill’s future expansion. Moreover, development on the affected parcels would comply with the applicable SVSP EIR mitigation measure to minimize construction debris, ensuring that there would be no new or more severe significant solid waste impacts compared with the impacts identified in the prior environmental documents.

Thus, the utilities infrastructure required by the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not significantly differ from that anticipated in the prior environmental documents, and utilities and service system impacts fall within the scope of the impacts already analyzed in the prior environmental documents.

Mitigation Measures: The following mitigation measures apply to development on the affected parcels:
• SVSP EIR WMM 4.11-5: Wastewater treatment plant capacity. • SVSP EIR MM 4.12.4-2: Divert construction debris.

XX. Wildfire
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments:

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 51 of 54 ends

b) Due to slope, prevailing
winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks,
and thereby expose
project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations
from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
c) Require the installation or
maintenance of
associated infrastructure
(such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or
that may result in
temporary or ongoing
impacts to the
environment?

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
d) Expose people or
structures to significant
risks, including
downslope or
downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of
runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage
changes?

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Discussion of Checklist Answers:

The SVSP area is not located within or near a state responsibility area and is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (see GP EIR, p. 4.10-27); therefore, this checklist topic does not apply.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 52 of 54 ends

XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance
Would the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments:

Environmental Issue
Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
Prior SVSP
Environmental
Documents?
Any New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Resulting in New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Any
MMs?
a) Have the potential to
substantially degrade the
quality of the
environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or
animal community,
substantially reduce the
number or restrict the
range of a rare or
endangered plant or
animal or eliminate
important examples of
the major periods of
California history or
prehistory?
See Sections
IV, V, VII, and
XVIII, above
WSP MND, pp.
52–54
No No No Yes
b) Have impacts that are
individually limited, but
cumulatively
considerable?
(“Cumulatively
considerable” means that
the incremental effects of
a project are
considerable when
viewed in connection with
the effects of the past
projects, the effects of
other current projects,
and the effects of
probable future projects.)
Final EIR,
Section 5.7.3
WSP MND, pp.
52–54
No No No Yes
c) Have environmental
effects which will cause
substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or
indirectly?
See Sections

III, VIII, XI, X,
and XIII, above
No No No Yes
COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 53 of 54 ends

Discussion of Checklist Answers:

With implementation of the City’s Mitigating Ordinances, Guidelines, and Standards and best management practices, mitigation measures described in the SVSP EIR and listed in this document, and permit conditions, the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not exceed the scope of any impact contemplated in the prior environmental documents associated with habitat, species, historic/prehistoric resources, or adverse effects on human beings. Furthermore, cumulative impacts associated with the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not exceed those contemplated in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND, because no individual impact exceeds the scope of that same impact in those environmental documents. Nevertheless, the cumulative effects of the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments and the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments (aka, the Proposed Project) are analyzed in a separate section of the Combined CEQA Document.

Mitigation Measures: See above checklist sections for applicable mitigation measures.

Conclusion: With the implementation of the applicable mitigation measures listed in this Addendum checklist, the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not result in a new significant impact or significant impacts that are substantially more severe than those analyzed in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND and modified by the various relevant addenda. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164, subdivision (a), the City finds that “none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred” regarding the mandatory findings of significance.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–12th ADDENDUM to SVSP EIR
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 54 of 54 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Based on analysis conducted in this Addendum and in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND and modified by the various relevant addenda, it is determined that implementation of the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments, as described herein, would not result in any new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts, either directly or as a result of new circumstances or information. The City may take the following actions in compliance with CEQA:
• Adopt the Addendum;
• Approve the SVSP amendment and rezone for Parcel WB-52; • Approve the General Plan amendment for Parcel WB-52;
• Abandon the 20-foot public access easement on Parcel WB-30; and • Approve the Amended Development Agreements.

In reviewing the site-specific information provided for the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments and acting as Lead Agency, the City of Roseville, Development Services Department, Planning Division has analyzed the potential environmental impacts created by this action and determined that the findings of CEQA Guidelines section 15162 concerning the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR and the findings of CEQA Guidelines section 15164 concerning the decision to prepare an Addendum can be made. As supported by substantial evidence within the Addendum to the SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH # 2008032115, adopted May 5, 2010), as modified by the WESTBROOK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH # 2008032115, adopted June 15, 2012), the Lead Agency makes the following findings:
[ X ] No substantial changes are proposed as part of the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments which would require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. [ X ] No changed circumstances would require major revisions of the previous EIR due to new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
[ X ] There is no new information of substantial importance of the kind set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15162, subdivision (a)(3), that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of due diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete.

Addendum Prepared by:
____________________________________________
Kinarik Shallow, Associate Planner
City of Roseville, Development Services–Planning Division DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT–PLANNING DIVISION
311 Vernon St, Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 774-5276

CAMPUS OAKS AND SIERRA VISTA LAND USE AMENDMENTS

PROJECT IN WESTERN ROSEVILLE

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT
5th ADDENDUM TO THE HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS
MASTER PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 95112022, CERTIFIED ON JUNE 5, 1996)
&
12th ADDENDUM TO THE SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2008032115, CERTIFIED ON MAY 5, 2010)
CUMULATIVE CONSIDERATIONS (Combined CEQA Document)
The Proposed Project includes two main components in two different planning areas, discussed in detail throughout this Combined CEQA Document. Each component is analyzed separately in an individual addendum using modified checklists. Each analysis, in its respective Mandatory Findings of Significance section, includes a determination on impacts that might be cumulatively considerable. The Addendum for the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments determined that “cumulative impacts associated with the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments would not exceed those contemplated in the COMP EIR and the COMP EIR 1st Addendum.” The Addendum for the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments likewise determined that “cumulative impacts associated with the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not exceed those contemplated in the SVSP EIR, as augmented by the WSP MND.” This Section considers the combined effects of the two Project components in order to set forth the total combined level of environmental impact from both the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments. This Section provides additional consideration of their combined cumulative impacts by looking at the two actions together in the context of the approved full buildout of the General Plan (GP) area, as contemplated in the certified 2020 GP EIR for the 2035 GP Update.

Methodology
Complicating the cumulative analysis here, the Project components occur in two distinct planning areas with different prior planning and environmental review documents. Cumulatively assessing these different Project components across two planning areas and under two different sets of planning and environmental review documents is highly complex and presents many analytical challenges. Thus, the City concluded that assessing the cumulative effect of the two Project components, as set forth in their new addenda, against the backdrop of the analysis and conclusions in the GP EIR presented a sounder and more accessible approach. With this approach, it can be determined whether these actions together exceed any impact conclusions contemplated in the GP EIR for full buildout of the entire GP area, inclusive of the COMP and SVSP areas in which the Project would occur.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–CUMULATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 2 of 6 ends

Both the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments are analyzed in their respective addenda as “subsequent environmental review” under CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 through 15164. Environmental analysis of this kind considers whether the impacts of a proposed project will exceed those already anticipated in a previously certified EIR, even if those impacts have not yet occurred in the present physical environment. “When a lead agency is considering whether to prepare a subsequent EIR, the agency is specifically authorized to limit its consideration to effects not considered in connection with the earlier project” (Martis Camp Community Association v. County of Placer (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 569, 608). Accordingly, this cumulative analysis uses the future conditions predicted in the prior environmental documents as a baseline (see Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (2013) 57 Cal.4th 445, 450).

Environmental Issue Areas Excluded from this Assessment The following environmental issue areas are excluded from this analysis because any potential impacts would be site specific, localized, temporary in nature, or are generally not applicable:
• Aesthetics (site specific);
• Agricultural and Forestry Resources (not applicable); • Biological Resources (site specific, localized, or not applicable); • Cultural Resources (site specific, localized, or not applicable); • Geology and Soils (not applicable);
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials (site specific or localized); • Land Use and Planning (site specific or not applicable); • Mineral Resources (not applicable);
• Noise (site specific or localized);
• Population and Housing (not applicable);
• Recreation (not applicable);
• Tribal Cultural Resources (site specific, localized, or not applicable); and • Wildfire (not applicable).

These impacts are discussed in more detail in the addenda for the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments.

Cumulative Assessment and Conclusions
At full buildout, the GP Update EIR assumed an additional 20,000 to 25,000 housing units would be constructed (GP EIR, p. 2-33). For analytical purposes, the GP EIR assumed at full buildout an approximate total of 75,200 housing units (GP EIR, p. 4.2-1). This development is and will be located within the 16 subareas analyzed in the EIR, inclusive of the COMP and SVSP areas, where the Proposed Project is located. With the Proposed Project, the number of housing units in the City increases by 551 units (285 in the COMP area and 266 in the SVSP area). Thus, the overall amount of contemplated residential development would increase slightly compared to what was approved with the 2035 GP and analyzed in the GP EIR.

This cumulative assessment looks to the following environmental issue areas with respect to impact conclusions reached in the certified GP EIR to determine if the proposed land use changes result in increases to any impact conclusion reached in the GP EIR.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–CUMULATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 3 of 6 ends

Air Quality
Upon full buildout of the GP area, the GP EIR concluded that the following air quality impacts will occur:
• Impacts from construction- and operation-related air pollutant emissions will be significant and unavoidable (GP EIR, pp. 4.4-28, 4.4-36);
• Impacts to sensitive receptors as a result of exposure to substantial pollutant concentrations will be less than significant during construction but significant and unavoidable during operation (GP EIR, pp. 4.4-45,

4.4-46);
• Impacts from carbon monoxide hotspots will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.4-49); and • Impacts from other emissions such as odor will be significant and unavoidable (GP EIR, p. 4.4-53).

As concluded in the addenda, all air quality impacts associated with the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not exceed those anticipated in the COMP EIR and SVSP EIR, respectively, and associated subsequent environmental documents, and would therefore not result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of an existing significant impact. In fact, air emissions would be reduced during construction as a result of the change in land use on Parcel CO-52 from business/light industrial to residential and, even with both Project components combined, would not exceed PCAPCD’s CEQA thresholds of significance for construction (see Attachment A, Table 3). During operation, the combined Proposed Project components would result in some increases in criteria pollutants, with more occurring in the SVSP area than the COMP area as a result of the density bonus units (see Attachment A, Table 4). But, when Project components are combined, only the ROG emissions would exceed PCAPCD’s CEQA thresholds of significance for operation (see Attachment A, Table 4), and only by 2.80 lbs/day after mitigation (see Attachment A, Table 5). This increase in ROG, incidentally, may be overstated in the CalEEMod model, which does not allow for individualized adjustments for factors such as the age-restricted units proposed for Parcel WB-30 that are anticipated to produce fewer ROG emissions than their non-restricted counterparts (see Attachment A for more details). Moreover, combined net increases in operational criteria pollutants represent only a marginal percentage increase within the COMP and SVSP planning areas (a 0.33 percent increase for ROG, a 0.33 percent increase for NOx, and a 0.28 percent increase for PM10) (see Table 6 of Raney Air Quality analysis).

Furthermore, odor impacts would decrease due to the proposed land use change on Parcel CO-52, because residential uses, unlike industrial uses, are not classified as likely to produce objectionable odors (see GP EIR, pp. 4.4-49 to 4.4-50). Similarly, residential land uses are not anticipated to produce operational TACs. As well, residential development on all parcels would comply with all applicable Placer County Air Pollution Control District mitigation measures and planning-area-specific mitigation measures, which would help to reduce GHG emissions during both construction and operation. As a result, the combined Proposed Project components would not exceed any air quality impacts analyzed in the GP EIR.

Energy
Upon full buildout of the GP area, the GP EIR concluded that the following transportation and traffic impacts will occur:
• Impacts from the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy during construction and operation will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.15-18); and • Impacts associated with conflicts with State or local energy efficiency plans will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.15-19).

As concluded in the addenda, all energy impacts associated with the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not exceed those anticipated in the COMP EIR and SVSP EIR, respectively, and associated subsequent environmental documents. In fact, energy would be reduced because of the reduction in VMT from the redesignation and rezoning of Parcel CO-52 and the age-restriction on future COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–CUMULATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 4 of 6 ends

residents of development planned for Parcel WB-30, which would in turn reduce the localized consumption of fossil fuels. Notably, the transportation sector is the “largest energy consuming sector in California” (GP EIR, p.

4.15-12). Furthermore, all housing units constructed as a result of the Proposed Project would be built on accordance with California Energy Code Title 24, to meet the Building Energy Efficiency Standards, including, but not limited to, standards for water and space heating and cooling equipment, insulation for doors, pipes, walls, and ceilings, and energy-saving appliances. The constructed units also would be eligible for rebates and other financial incentives from both the electric and gas providers for the purchase of energy-efficient appliances and systems, which would further reduce the operational energy demand. The Proposed Project would also increase housing density throughout the City, potentially improving per-unit energy efficiency. As a result, the combined Proposed Project components would not exceed any energy impacts analyzed in the GP EIR; on the contrary, the Proposed Project would likely reduce these impacts.

Greenhouse Gases
Upon full buildout of the GP area, the GP EIR concluded that the following GHG emission impact will occur:
• Impacts associated with conflicts with applicable plans, policies or regulations for the reduction of GHG emissions will be significant and unavoidable (GP EIR, p. 4.5-27).

As concluded in the addenda, all GHG emission impacts associated with the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not exceed those anticipated in the COMP EIR and SVSP EIR, respectively, and associated subsequent environmental documents. When both Project components are combined, construction-related GHG emission would increase above emissions estimated for currently approved land uses, but those emissions would still fall well below PCAPCD’s CEQA GHG construction thresholds (see Attachment A, Table 10). Combined operational emissions likewise would increase, and while operational emissions would exceed PCAPCD’s CEQA GHG operational de minimis thresholds (as would the existing approved land uses and densities), they would not exceed PCAPCD’s bright-line threshold or PCAPCD’s efficiency metric threshold for residential urban projects (see Attachment A, Tables 9 and 10). As well, residential development on all parcels would comply with all applicable Placer County Air Pollution Control District mitigation measures, which would help to reduce GHG emissions during both construction and operation. As a result, the combined Proposed Project components would not exceed any GHG emission impacts analyzed in the GP EIR.

Hydrology and Water Quality
Upon full buildout of the GP area, the GP EIR concluded that the following hydrology and water impacts will occur:
• Impacts from violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or conflicts with a water quality control plan will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.13-30); • Impacts to groundwater recharge or groundwater supplies that might impede implementation of a sustainable groundwater management plan will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.13-32); • Impacts to drainage patterns resulting in substantial erosion or siltation will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.13-35);
• Impacts to drainage patterns resulting in runoff exceeding capacity of existing system or increasing flooding sources of polluted runoff will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.13-41); and • Impacts from the release of pollutants in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.13-42).

As concluded in the addenda, all hydrology and water quality impacts associated with the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not exceed those anticipated in the COMP EIR and SVSP EIR, respectively, and associated subsequent environmental documents. In actuality, improvements made to the currently vacant parcels as a result of eventual development would treat and mitigate storm waters COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–CUMULATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 5 of 6 ends

in a manner that does not currently occur and would better distribute storm water, along with water quality control features, throughout the entirety of the COMP and SVSP areas. Hydrology and water quality impacts associated with both Proposed Project components would not exceed those anticipated in the COMP and SVSP EIRs and, despite some differences in land use and density increases, the scope and scale of potential impacts would remain roughly the same. As a result, the combined Proposed Project components would not exceed any hydrology and water quality impacts analyzed in the GP EIR.

Public Services
Upon full buildout of the GP area, the GP EIR concluded that the following public service impacts will occur:
• Impacts from increased demand for police protection facilities will be less than significant (GP EIR, p.

4.11-23);
• Impacts from increased demand for fire protection services and facilities will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.11-25);
• Impacts from increased demand for school services and facilities will be less than significant (GP EIR, p.

4.11-27); and
• Impacts from the need for new or expanded recreation facilities or accelerated use of existing facilities will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.11-29).

As concluded in the addenda, all public service impacts associated with the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not exceed those anticipated in the COMP EIR and SVSP EIR, respectively, and associated subsequent environmental documents. The proposed development would be subject to the same fees and taxes and codes and regulations as the previously approved land uses. As a result, the combined Proposed Project components would not exceed any public services impacts analyzed in the GP EIR.

Transportation/Traffic
Upon full buildout of the GP area, the GP EIR concluded that the following transportation and traffic impacts will occur:
• Impacts from vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) in exceedance of thresholds will be significant and unavoidable (GP EIR, p. 4.3-36);
• Impacts to hazards due to design features, incompatible uses, or emergency access will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.3-40); and
• Impacts associated with conflicts with adopted transportation-related policies, plans, or programs will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.3-43).

As concluded in the addenda, all transportation and traffic impacts associated with the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not exceed those anticipated in the COMP EIR and SVSP EIR, respectively, and associated subsequent environmental documents. In fact, VMT would be reduced from current approved conditions as a result of the redesignation and rezoning of Parcel CO-52 and the age-restriction on future residents of development planned for Parcel WB-30. As a result, the combined Proposed Project components would not exceed any transportation and traffic impacts analyzed in the GP EIR; on the contrary, the Proposed Project would reduce these impacts.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–CUMULATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 6 of 6 ends

Utilities and Service Systems
Upon full buildout of the GP area, the GP EIR concluded that the following utilities and service system impacts will occur:
• Impacts resulting from the relocation of or the construction of new or expanded utilities and service systems facilities will significant and unavoidable (GP EIR, p. 4.12-24); • Impacts to water supplies will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.12-28); • Impacts to wastewater treatment capacity will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.12-30); and • Impacts to solid waste generation and associated capacity statutes and regulations will be less than significant (GP EIR, p. 4.12-32).

As concluded in the addenda, all utilities and service system impacts associated with the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments would not exceed those anticipated in the COMP EIR and SVSP EIR, respectively, and associated subsequent environmental documents. The City has ample water supply for the proposed and planned development, despite some slight increase in demand. Wastewater generation would marginally increase, but the applicable wastewater treatment plant has capacity and, in any event, applicable mitigation requires this be verified prior to obtaining a building permit. Solid waste generation would likely remain the same because a decrease in waste generation associated with Parcel COMP-52 (due to lower anticipated waste generation with high-density residential use as compared to tech/business/light industrial use) will offset the anticipated small increase on Parcels WB-30, WB-32, and FD-34 (due to increased residential density). Regardless, the life of the Western Regional Sanitary Landfill, which serves the area, was recently extended from 2058 to 2110, and has ample capacity. Likewise for electricity demand. Land use changes on Parcel CO-52 would result in a decrease in electricity demand, which likely would offset the slight increase in demand on Parcels WB-30, WB-32, and FD-34. Of course, all development would comply with state and local energy efficiency and other requirements. As a result, the combined Proposed Project components would not exceed any utilities and service system impacts analyzed in the GP EIR; on the contrary, the Proposed Project likely would reduce these impacts.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 1 of 3 ends

CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS (Combined CEQA Document)
As demonstrated in the addenda checklist analyses included as part of this Combined CEQA Document, the City finds that the Proposed Project can be analyzed pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162(a) and 15164(a), in separate addenda, because none of the conditions calling for the preparation of subsequent or supplemental EIRs or other subsequent CEQA documents are present:
• No project changes or changed circumstances would require major revisions of the previous EIRs due to new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
• No new information of substantial importance of the kind set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15162, subdivision (a)(3), has been uncovered that indicates the Proposed Project would create new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant impacts than those analyzed in previously certified CEQA documents.

Accordingly, the City of Roseville approves and adopts the 5th Addendum to the Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan EIR and the 12th Addendum to the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR.

Furthermore, although not required under CEQA, the City of Roseville makes the following findings to facilitate informed decision-making:
• The analysis and conclusions presented in the individual addenda and in this Combined CEQA Document are based on substantial evidence found in this document, in previously certified and approved/adopted planning and CEQA documents, and generally in the administrative record for the Proposed Project (see CEQA Guidelines, § 15091(b); Pub. Resources Code, § 21167.6(e)), including all documents and materials incorporated herein by reference. This evidence is available for review during business hours at the Roseville Civic Center, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA and/or as otherwise indicated in this document.
• The two components of the Proposed Project, the Proposed GP/COMP Amendments and the Proposed GP/SVSP Amendments, would not cumulatively exceed any impacts analyzed in the GP EIR and in fact would reduce some impacts.
• The Project will advance the City of Roseville's objectives, goals, and policies for the COMP and SVSP areas and the City in general. Following are select examples of the how the Project will advance applicable plan area objectives and General Plan goals and polices:
o COMP Objective: Support the aspirations of Hewlett-Packard to build and operate its facilities within a mixed use master planned community that provides opportunities for convenient and sustainable relationships between employees and nearby housing opportunities, commercial services, and open-space and recreational amenities.

The Project will provide nearby housing opportunities on Parcel CO-52, which will be converted from a tech/business use to multi-family housing, resulting in 285 new housing units. o SVSP Objective (for Housing Opportunities): Plan for approximately 8,679 residential units to provide housing choices in varying densities that respond to all market segments, including opportunities for rental units and affordable housing consistent with the City’s General Plan.

The Project will consist entirely of rental units and primarily of affordable units, and will increase the number of planned units within SVSP by 266, thereby greatly increasing opportunities for those types of housing within the SVSP area and City.
o GP Goal H2.1: Work with the development and business communities to provide affordable rental and homeownership opportunities for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and middle-income households.

The Project will add 551 new high-density housing units to the City, including 266 new COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 2 of 3 ends

affordable housing units. As a result, the Project will provide affordable housing opportunities for households with diverse incomes, all without relying on City taxpayer-funded subsidies. o GP Goal H4.1: Ensure the availability of quality housing opportunities for the elderly, the disabled, large families, female heads of households, and the homeless.

The Project will include 355 housing units that will be available exclusively to low-income senior citizens, thus providing additional (and affordable) housing opportunities for the elderly.

Additionally, the Project would add 266 new affordable housing units to the City, increasing the availability of quality affordable housing opportunities for other special needs groups. o GP Policy LU1.4: Promote a diversity of residential living options (e.g., density ranges, housing types, affordability ranges), while ensuring community compatibility and well-designed residential development.

The Project will provide 551 new high-density housing units (including 266 new affordable units) within the City that will be available to households with diverse incomes. Additionally, the Project will include 355 units that are restricted for use by senior citizens. Development is planned in or near residential or mixed-use areas, and these diverse housing units will comply with all applicable design guidelines, ensuring a high-quality of design and compatibility with the surrounding community.
o GP Goal LU8.4: Continue a comprehensive, logical planning process, rather than an incremental, piecemeal approach.

The Project consists of separate but interrelated land use planning actions in two distinct planning areas within the City, enabling the City to avoid piecemeal review by thoroughly contextualizing and adequately considering all Project actions together. o GP Policy AQ1.10: Improve overall health and sustainability of the community by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.

The Project includes land use changes and housing unit restrictions that will result in a net reduction in City-wide VMT—and thus, a net reduction in vehicular GHG emissions—while still increasing housing supply within the City.
o GP Policy AQ1.17: Conserve energy and reduce air pollutant emissions by encouraging energy efficient building designs and transportation systems and promoting energy retrofits of existing structures.

The Project will add 551 new high-density housing units to the City, which will comply with all applicable building and efficiency standards and will be eligible for rebates and other financial incentives to incorporate energy-efficient appliances and systems, ensuring energy conservation and a comparative reduction in air pollutant emissions. • The Project will confer several economic, social, and other benefits to the City of Roseville (and the state), including but not limited to:
o Assist the City in fulfilling its share of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) by increasing the City’s housing stock by 551 housing units, including 266 affordable housing units (10 additional Very-Low-Income Units and 256 additional Low-Income Units), thereby helping to lessen upward pressure on housing costs. The beneficiaries of this new housing will be lowincome individuals and families making no more than 80 percent of the average median income (AMI) and very-low income individuals and families making no more than 50 percent AMI. o Increase the City’s stock of much-needed housing dedicated for senior citizens. o Increase property tax, and likely sales tax for the City (from new residents relocating to the new housing from other areas within the City or from outside the City, including those lower income households whose members work in the City but currently live outside the City), which in turn would help fund important local public services, such as fire and police services.

COMBINED CEQA DOCUMENT–CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS
August 16, 2023
COMP & SVSP Land Use Amendments Project; File No. PL23-0064

Page 3 of 3 ends

o Reduce the regional VMT by converting land planned for a tech/business use to housing and by increasing age-restricted and multi-family housing in the City, resulting in a commensurate decrease of GHG emissions.
o Through mitigation, contribute to certain infrastructure improvements by paying its fair share towards those improvements, such as for regional flood control facilities (see, e.g., COMP EIR MM 4.4-2(b)). The Project will also construct or contribute to funding other infrastructure improvements that will benefit additional development projects and City residents and visitors. o Through the increase in residential units, contribute additional funding for public services through the Public Services Community Facilities District (CFD), and additional funding for fire and police services through the Municipal Services CFD.

Attachment A
(Combined CEQA Document)—Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment for the Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project (Raney Planning & Management, August 2023)

CC EXHIBIT B
Air Quality and Greenhouse
Gas Impact Analysis
Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use
Amendments Project in Western
Roseville
Prepared for:

Pine Island Apartments, LLC and FD34
Development LLC
August 2023
Prepared by
1501 Sports Drive, Suite A, Sacramento, CA 95834
Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 1 ends

INTRODUCTION
This Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis identifies and analyzes the potential environmental impacts from the Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville (proposed project) related to air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The information and analysis in this document are organized in accordance with the City of Roseville’s standard addendum checklist in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The analysis provided in this document identifies previously approved mitigation measures that continue to apply to the project to reduce potentially significant environmental effects identified in the previous CEQA documents. All modeling results are included as an appendix to this document.

PROJECT LOCATION
The project sites (parcels CO-52, WB-30, WB-32, WB-52, and FD-34, aka “affected parcels”) are located in two planning areas, the Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan Area (COMP), generally south of Blue Oaks Boulevard and west of New Meadow Drive; and the Sierra Vista Specific Plan (SVSP), generally west of Fiddyment Road, north of Baseline Road and south of Pleasant Grove Boulevard in the City of Roseville, California (see Figure 1, Roseville Specific Plans). The five parcels combined consist of 39.36 acres and are currently undeveloped. Parcel CO-52 surrounding land uses include undeveloped land to the north, residential apartments to the west and south, soccer field and industrial uses beyond to the east (see Figure 2 for parcel location in the COMP). Parcels WB-30 and WB-52 surrounding land uses include undeveloped land to the north and west, developing residential to the south, residential to the southeast, and undeveloped land to the east. Parcel WB-32 surrounding land uses include residential uses to the east and north, and undeveloped land to the west and south. Parcel FD-34 surrounding land uses include developing residential to the north and undeveloped lands to the south, west and east, except for an electrical substation to the immediate south (see Figure 3 for parcel locations in the SVSP).

PROJECT SUMMARY
The proposed project consists of two main components: the proposed General Plan and Campus Oaks Master Plan amendments, including rezoning, major project permit stage 1 modification, and development agreement amendment for parcel CO-52, and the proposed General Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan amendments, including rezoning for parcel WB-52, density bonuses for parcels WB-30, WB-32, and FD-34, modifications to the affordable housing obligations for parcels WB-30, WB-32, and FD-34, and development agreement amendments for all four parcels. As a result of the density bonuses, the proposed project will result in an increase in housing density and in the amount of very-low-income and low-income units within the City of Roseville. Table 1 below summarizes the City of Roseville’s general plan designations and zoning for the project’s parcels.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 2 ends

Table 1
General Plan and Zoning Designations
Parcel Acres
Current General
Plan Current Zoning
Proposed
General
Plan
Proposed
Zoning
CO-52 17.65
Tech Park/Business
Professional, Light
Industrial
Industrial/Business
Park/Special Area
HighDensity
Residential
R3 MultiFamily
Housing
WB-30 8.06 High Density Residential R3 Multi-Family Housing No change No change WB-32 5.11 High Density Residential R3 Multi-Family Housing No change No change WB-52 1.50 Park Park
HighDensity
Residential
R3 MultiFamily
Housing
FD-34 7.04 High Density Residential R3 Multi-Family Housing No change No change Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 3 ends

Figure 1
Roseville Specific Plans
Locations:

Campus Oaks Master Plan (within the
North Industrial Specific Plan)
Sierra Vista Specific Plan
Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 4 ends

Figure 2
Project Location (Parcel CO-52 in the Campus Oaks Master Plan) Project Site
Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 5 ends

Figure 3
Project Locations (Parcels in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan) Project Sites
Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 6 ends

SOURCES

1. CARB. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April 2005.

Available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023- 05/Land%20Use%20Handbook_0.pdf.

2. CARB Consumer Products Program. Available at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ourwork/programs/consumer-products-program/about. Accessed August 3, 2023.

3. CARB. In-Use Off-Road Diesel Fueled Fleets Regulation. Available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/use-road-diesel-fueled-fleets-regulation.

4. CARB Pollution Mapping Tool. Available at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/carb-pollutionmapping-tool. Accessed August, 3, 2023.

5. Fehr and Peers. Draft Technical Memorandum, Transportation Impact Analysis for Rezoning Various Parcels in the Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan. July 25, 2023.

6. Placer County Air Pollution Control District. 2017 CEQA Handbook. October 2016. Available at: https://www.placerair.org/1801/CEQA-Handbook.

7. Placer County Air Pollution Control District. California Environmental Quality Act Thresholds of Significance Justification Report. October 2016. Available at:
https://www.placer.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2061/Threshold-Justification-ReportPDF?bidId=.

8. Placer County Air Pollution Control District. Rulebook. Available at:
https://www.placerair.org/1861/Rules. Accessed July 23, 2023.

9. Roseville, City of, Addendum and Initial Study of Environmental Significance, Campus Oaks Master Plan Amendment – General Plan Amendment, Rezone, Development Agreement Amendments – File #PL14-037 and File #PL14-0374. July 6, 2015. Available at https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Dev elopment%20Services/Planning/Environmental%20Documents%20and%20Public%20Notic es/Private%20Development%20Projects/Campus%20Oaks/Campus%20Oaks%20Addendu m%2007.07.2015%20CLEAN.pdf. Accessed August 8, 2023.

10. Roseville, City of. Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 95112022). Certified June 5, 1996. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8775121. Accessed August 11, 2023.

11. Roseville, City of. Sierra Vista Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2008032115). Certified May 5, 2010. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8775140, Accessed August 11, 2023.

12. Roseville, City of. Westbrook Specific Plan Amendment to the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration. April 2012. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8775140. Accessed August 11, 2023.

13. Windy.App. Roseville data. Available at:
https://windy.app/forecast2/spot/469575/Roseville+CA/statistics. Accessed July 31, 2023.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 7 ends

III. Air Quality
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in Prior
Environmental
Documents.

Do
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Prior
Environmental
Documents’
Mitigation
Measures
Implemented or
Addressing
Impacts.
a) Conflict with or
obstruct
implementation of
the applicable air
quality plan?
COMP1

4.10-1,

4.10-2,

4.10-4,

4.10-6
SVSP2

4.4-1,

4.4-2,

4.4-6
No No No Yes
b) Result in a
cumulatively
considerable net
increase of any
criteria for which the
project region is nonattainment under an
applicable federal or
state ambient air
quality standard?
See a)
above No No No Yes
c) Expose sensitive
receptors to
substantial pollutant
concentrations?
COMP

4.10-3,

4.10-7,

4.10-8,

4.10-9
SVSP

4.4-3,

4.4-4
No No No Yes
d) Result in other
emissions (such as
those leading to
odors) adversely
affecting a
substantial number
of people?
COMP

4.10-5
SVSP

4.4-5
No No No None required
1 Roseville, City of. Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 95112022).

Certified June 5, 1996. 2 Roseville, City of. Sierra Vista Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2008032115). Certified May 5, 2010. Westbrook Specific Plan Amendment to the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration. April 2012.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 8 ends

Discussion
a.b. The City of Roseville is located within the boundaries of the Sacramento Valley Air Basin (SVAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD). Federal and State ambient air quality standards (AAQS) have been established for six common air pollutants, known as criteria pollutants, due to the potential for pollutants to be detrimental to human health and the environment. The criteria pollutants include particulate matter (PM), ground-level ozone, carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides (NOX), and lead. At the federal level, Placer County is designated as severe nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone AAQS, nonattainment for the 24-hour PM2.5 AAQS, and attainment or unclassified for all other criteria pollutant AAQS.

At the State level, the area is designated as a serious nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone AAQS, nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone AAQS, nonattainment for the PM10 AAQS, and attainment or unclassified for all other State AAQS.

As a part of the SVAB federal ozone nonattainment area, the PCAPCD works with the other local air districts within the Sacramento area to develop a regional air quality management plan under the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) requirement. The regional air quality management plan is called the State Implementation Plan (SIP) which describes and demonstrates how Placer County, as well as the Sacramento nonattainment area, would attain the required federal ozone standard by the proposed attainment deadline. In accordance with the requirements of the FCAA, the PCAPCD, along with the other air districts in the region, prepared the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan (Ozone Attainment Plan) in December 2008. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) determined that the Ozone Attainment Plan met FCAA requirements and approved the Plan on March 26, 2009 as a revision to the SIP.

An update to the plan, the 2017 Revisions to the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan (2017 Ozone Attainment Plan), was prepared and adopted by CARB on November 16, 2017. An additional update to the plan was prepared and adopted by CARB on October 15, 2018, and known as the 2018 Updates to the California State Implementation Plan.

Nearly all development projects in the Sacramento region have the potential to generate air pollutants that may increase the difficultly of attaining federal and State AAQS.

Therefore, evaluation of air quality impacts is required. In order to evaluate ozone and other criteria air pollutant emissions and support attainment goals for those pollutants that the area is designated nonattainment, PCAPCD has developed its California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Handbook,3 which includes recommended thresholds of significance, including mass emission thresholds for construction-related and operational ozone precursors, as the area is under nonattainment for ozone. For development projects, PCAPCD established significance thresholds for emissions of the ozone precursors reactive organic gases (ROG) and NOX, as well as for PM10, expressed in pounds per day (lbs/day) presented in Table 2.
3 PCAPCD. 2017 California Environmental Quality Act Handbook. October 2016. Available at:
https://www.placerair.org/1801/CEQA-Handbook. Accessed 7/27/2023 Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 9 ends

Table 2
PCAPCD Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant Construction Thresholds
Daily Maximum
Operational Thresholds
Daily Maximum
ROG 82 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
NOX 82 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
PM10 82 lbs/day 82 lbs/day
Source: PCAPCD, 2017 CEQA Handbook, October 2016.

Construction Criteria Pollutant Emissions
The PCAPCD provides guidance on reviewing proposed projects for air quality impacts in its CEQA Handbook, specifically Chapter 3 covers construction activities.

The project is required to comply with all PCAPCD rules applicable to construction activity which can be found on the PCAPCD’s Rules webpage.
4 Appendix A of PCAPCD’s CEQA
Handbook summarizes the most commonly applicable rules to construction including but not limited to the following rules:
• Rule 202, Visible Emissions;
• Rule 205, Nuisance;
• Rule 217, Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt Paving Materials; • Rule 218, Architectural Coatings;
• Rule 225, Wood Burning Appliances;
• Rule 228, Fugitive Dust;
• Rule 231, Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters;
• Rule 246, Natural Gas-fired Water Heaters;
• Rule 247, Natural Gas-fired Water Heaters, Small Boilers, and Process Heaters; • Rule 304, Land Developments Burning Smoke Management; and • Rule 501, General Permit Requirements.

The project will comply with applicable PCAPCD recommended construction mitigation measures listed in Appendix C of the PCAPCD CEQA Handbook and listed below. • Maintain all construction equipment properly according to manufacturer’s specifications.
• Fuel all off-road and portable diesel-powered equipment with CARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for use off-road). • Comply with the State Off-Road Regulation by using diesel construction equipment meeting CARB's Tier 2 certified engines or cleaner off-road heavy-duty diesel engines.
• Comply with the State On-Road Regulation by using on-road heavy-duty trucks that meet the CARB’s Tier 3 standard for on-road heavy-duty diesel engines. • All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and/or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5-minute idling limit.
• Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted. 4 PCAPCD Rulebook. Available at: https://www.placerair.org/1861/Rules. Accessed 7/28/2023 Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 10 ends

• Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors.
• Use Electrified equipment when feasible.
• Substitute gasoline-powered in place of diesel-powered equipment, where feasible.
• Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on-site where feasible, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), propane or biodiesel. • Require contractors to repower equipment with the cleanest engines available. • Require construction equipment use installed California Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategies. These strategies are listed at
http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/verdev/vt/cvt.htm.
• Require the contractor to prepare a dust control plan when the disturbed area is more than one (1) acre.
• Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. • Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency is required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible.
• All dirt stock-pile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. • All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible, with building pads laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
• All fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be shown on grading and building plans. • The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the fugitive dust emissions and enhance the implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize dust complaints, reduce visible emissions below 20% opacity, and prevent transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress.

The proposed project was modeled using CalEEMod 2022’s default construction information to provide full disclosure of emissions and to compare emissions to PCAPCD’s thresholds of significance. Proposed project modeling results are included as Appendix A.

A direct comparison of the construction emissions associated with the planning areas (COMP and SVSP) under the proposed project to the emissions that could occur in the same planning areas under the previously approved land uses (baseline) is provided in Table 3 to support the current environmental review and to provide an abundance of information. Appendix B includes the baseline project CalEEMod reports.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 11 ends

Table 3
Unmitigated Construction Criteria Pollutant Emissions
Comparison (lbs/day)
Scenario ROG NOX PM10
Baseline
COMP 44.40 36.00 21.40
SVSP 14.40 36.00 21.40
Total Baseline 58.80 72.00 42.80
with Proposed Project
COMP 10.20 36.00 21.40
SVSP 20.80 36.00 21.40
Total Proposed Project 31.00 72.00 42.80
CHANGE FROM BASELINE -27.80 0.00 0.00
Threshold of Significance 82 82 82
Exceed Current Threshold? No No No
Exceed Prior Impact Conclusions
(significant and unavoidable in COMP
and SVSP areas) No No No
Source: CalEEMod, July and August 2023 (see Appendices A and B).

As shown in Table 3, the maximum daily unmitigated proposed project constructionrelated emissions for the COMP parcel would decrease slightly below current approved conditions for ROG and remain the same for NOX and PM10. For the SVSP parcels, the maximum daily unmitigated proposed project construction-related emissions would increase slightly above current approved conditions for ROG and remain the same for NOX and PM10. When looking at the project as a whole, if it is conservatively assumed that all parcels are developed concurrently, construction-related emissions would overall decrease for ROG and remain the same for NOX and PM10,
5 and would be below the
PCAPCD CEQA thresholds of significance used by the City of Roseville. Nonetheless, because the proposed project is part of two previously approved larger projects, COMP and SVSP, the air quality mitigation measures from the previous environmental documents remain applicable to the proposed project and would reduce constructionrelated emissions even further (COMP EIR MM 4.10-1 [Provide dust controls], COMP EIR MM 4.10-2(a) [Maintain construction equipment and vehicles], COMP EIR MM 4.10-2(b) [Develop and implement a Construction Employee Trip Reduction Plan], SVSP EIR MM

4.4-1 [Dust and construction control measures], SVSP EIR WMM 4.4-3 [Measures to reduce operational emissions], and SVSP EIR WMM 4.4-7 [Risk assessment and site specific measures]). Also, the proposed project is subject to Placer County Air Pollution Control District construction mitigation measures.

Therefore, project construction would not result in new or more substantially severe significant air quality impacts that have not been previously analyzed in the COMP and SVSP environmental documents, which found potential construction-related impacts to be significant and unavoidable in both the COMP and SVSP area, and indeed would result in fewer construction-related emissions.
5 Since the proposed project construction details are not currently known, CalEEMod defaults were used in the analysis. CalEEMod construction default information (i.e., equipment usage, grading and site preparation activity) is based on project acres. Because the proposed project and baseline project acres are the same, the NOX and PM10 emissions did not change from the baseline project to the proposed project.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 12 ends

Operational Criteria Pollutant Emissions
Operational emissions of ROG, NOX, and PM10 would be generated by the project from mobile, area, and energy usage sources. CalEEMod modeling results for the proposed project, which include project trip rates from the Draft Technical Memorandum on Transportation Impact Analysis for Rezoning Various Parcels in the Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan,
6 are included as Appendix A. A direct comparison of
the operational emissions associated with the affected parcels under the proposed project to the operational emissions that could occur on the same parcels under the previously approved land uses (baseline) is provided in Table 4 to support the current environmental review and to provide an abundance of information. Appendix B includes the baseline project CalEEMod reports.

Table 4
Unmitigated Operational Criteria Pollutant Emissions
Comparison (lbs/day)
Scenario ROG NOX PM10
Baseline
COMP 11.70 8.81 14.80
SVSP 29.20 14.10 22.00
Total Baseline 40.90 22.91 36.80
with Proposed Project
COMP 15.50 7.49 11.60
SVSP 42.60 20.20 31.10
Total Proposed Project 58.10 27.69 42.70
CHANGE FROM BASELINE +17.20 +4.78 +5.90
Threshold of Significance 55 55 82
Exceed Current Threshold? Yes No No
Exceed Prior Impact Conclusions
(significant and unavoidable in COMP
and SVSP areas) No No No
Source: CalEEMod, July and August 2023 (see Appendices A and B).

As demonstrated in Table 4, the proposed project’s maximum daily unmitigated NOX, and PM10 emissions for the COMP parcel would decrease, while the ROG emissions would incrementally increase, but all criteria pollutants of concern would be below the current PCAPCD CEQA thresholds of significance for the criteria pollutants of concern used by the City of Roseville. Project operation on the SVSP parcels would result in marginal to moderate increases in all three criteria pollutants, but would also still be below the current thresholds. When all affected parcels in both planning areas are viewed together, the unmitigated operation results in overall increases of the three criteria pollutants, but no threshold exceedances for NOX, and PM10. The unmitigated ROG emissions, however, would exceed the current threshold (by only 3.10 lbs/day). Although, notably, the operational ROG (and NOX) threshold of significance used in the prior CEQA documents was markedly higher—82 lbs/day versus the current standard of 55 lbs/day. Thus, the threshold analysis presented here is highly conservative in comparison to the previously certified analysis.
6 Fehr and Peers. Draft Technical Memorandum on Transportation Impact Analysis for Rezoning Various Parcels in the Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan. July 25, 2023.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 13 ends

Because the proposed project is part of two previously approved larger projects, COMP and SVSP, the parcels were analyzed in the previous environmental documents and are subject to various air quality mitigation measures from the previous environmental documents. The SVSP environmental document includes Mitigation Measure 4.4-3 to reduce vehicle emissions and operational emissions from development through installation of charging stations, higher residential densities, access to transit stops, and restriction of woodburning appliances in multi-family residential projects. The aforementioned mitigation measure would reduce the proposed project emissions, including ROG emissions. As well, the proposed project is subject to Placer County Air Pollution Control District operation mitigation measures.

Furthermore, 38 percent of the proposed project ROG emissions are estimated to come from the use of consumer products by the future residences (such as the use of things like hairspray and household cleaning products), which will vary and may be less than estimated by the CalEEMod modeling, but for which such individualized variance cannot be adjusted in the modeling. Particularly, ROG emissions from the age-restricted units planned for Parcel WB-30likely would be lesser than what is currently modeled. It is important to note the CARB is responsible for ROG emission reductions from the consumer products sector. In September 2022, CARB approved the 2022 State Strategy for the SIP, which included a commitment to reduce ROG emissions from consumer products by 20 tons/day by the year 2037, which will further reduce the ROG emissions from the proposed project.7 Thus, with implementation of the previously required mitigation measure in conjunction with State regulations and local air district measures, the proposed project’s combined ROG emissions would be reduced, but not below the applicable PCAPCD ROG threshold of significance as shown in Table 5.

Table 5
Mitigated Operational ROG Emissions (lbs/day)
with Proposed Project ROG
COMP 15.40
SVSP 42.40
Total Proposed Project 57.80
Threshold of Significance 55
Exceed Current Threshold? Yes
Exceed Prior Impact Conclusions
(significant and unavoidable in COMP
and SVSP areas)
No
Source: CalEEMod, August 2023 (see Appendix C).

As shown in Table 5, the proposed project’s mitigated operational ROG emissions are estimated to be slightly higher (2.8 lbs/day) than the threshold level. This modest threshold exceedance is consistent with the prior COMP and SVSP environmental documents, which identified impacts related to air pollutant increases as significant and unavoidable for full buildout of the planning areas, even with implementation of mitigation. 8,9 And, as
7 CARB Consumer Products Program. Available at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/consumer-productsprogram/about. Accessed August 3, 2023. 8 Roseville, City of. Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 95112022).

Certified June 5, 1996. Page 6-19. 9 Roseville, City of. Sierra Vista Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2008032115). Certified May 5, 2010. Page 4.4-31.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 14 ends

discussed just above, the operational ROG threshold of significance used in the prior CEQA documents was markedly higher; thus, the threshold analysis presented here is highly conservative in comparison to the previously certified analysis.

Therefore, the above analysis demonstrates that the operational emissions from the proposed land use changes would not create any new impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts, as compared to the previously approved COMP and SVSP environmental documents, which found potential operation-related impacts to be significant and unavoidable in both areas.

Furthermore, the proposed project’s ROG, NOX, and PM10 increases contribute toward only a nominal percentage increase in these criteria pollutants within the larger SVSP and COMP planning areas. The results and comparison of the modeling efforts are presented in Table 6 and the modeling reports are provided in Appendix D.10 Table 6
Unmitigated Operational Criteria Pollutant Emissions Entire Planning Area Comparison (lbs/day)
Scenario ROG NOX PM10
Baseline
COMP Planning Area 302 95 189
SVSP Planning Area 4,297 2,348 5,115
Total Baseline 4,599 2,443 5,304
with Proposed Project
COMP Planning Area 305 96 193
SVSP Planning Area 4,309 2,355 5,126
Total Proposed Project 4,614 2,451 5,319
CHANGE FROM BASELINE +15 +8 +15
Threshold of Significance 55 55 82
Exceed Current Threshold? Yes Yes Yes
Exceed Prior Impact Conclusions
(significant and unavoidable in COMP
and SVSP areas) No No No
Source: CalEEMod, August 2023 (see Appendix D).

Cumulative Criteria Pollutant Emissions
Past, present, and future development projects contribute to the region’s adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis. By nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. A single project is not sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of ambient air quality standards (AAQS). Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project’s contribution to the cumulative impact is considerable, then the project’s impact on air quality would be considered significant. In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants, PCAPCD considered the emission levels for which a project’s individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable.
10 The lbs/day increases shown in Table 6 vary slightly from those shown in Table 4 as a result of different factors and variances involved in modeling air emissions for larger planning areas, including traffic analysis zone differences which impact motor vehicle trip distances.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 15 ends

The thresholds of significance presented in Table 2 represent the levels at which a project’s individual emissions of criteria air pollutants or precursors would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the PCAPCD’s existing air quality conditions. If a project exceeds the significance thresholds presented in Table 2, the proposed project’s emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant adverse cumulative air quality impacts to the region’s existing air quality conditions.

Because, as discussed above, the proposed project would result in both constructionrelated and operational emissions that by-and-large do not exceed PCAPCD CEQA thresholds of significance with the adopted COMP and SVSP mitigation measures in conjunction with State regulations and local air district measures, construction and operations of the project would not be expected to result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the region’s existing air quality conditions. The exceedance of the ROG threshold is marginal and does not exceed the scope of analysis in the prior certified CEQA documents, which found the same impact to be significant and unavoidable. Accordingly, the proposed project would not create any new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to cumulative emissions of criteria pollutants as compared to the previously approved COMP and SVSP CEQA documents, both of which found the cumulative impact to be significant and unavoidable (see, e.g., COMP Draft EIR, p. 6-13; SVSP Final EIR, p. 5-130).

Conclusion
Based on the above, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact that had not been previously analyzed in the COMP and SVSP environmental documents or a substantially more severe impact than found in the previously certified and adopted CEQA documents, all of which found potential operation-related impacts to be significant and unavoidable in both the COMP and SVSP areas, in regard to conflicting with or obstructing implementation of the applicable air quality plan, violating any air quality standards, or contributing substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, or resulting in a cumulatively considerable net increase in any criteria air pollutant. The approved construction and operational mitigation measures from the previous SVSP environmental document would remain applicable to the proposed project. c. Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others, due to the types of population groups or activities involved. Heightened sensitivity may be caused by existing health problems, proximity to the emissions source, and/or duration of exposure to air pollutants. Children, pregnant women, the elderly, and those with existing health problems are especially vulnerable to the effects of air pollution. Sensitive receptors are typically defined as facilities where sensitive receptor population groups (i.e., children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and the chronically ill) are likely to be located. Accordingly, land uses that are typically considered to be sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, retirement homes, convalescent homes, hospitals, and medical clinics. Sensitive receptors in the project vicinity include existing and developing residences surrounding the project sites.

The major pollutant concentrations of concern are localized CO emissions and toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions which are addressed in further detail below.

Localized CO Emissions
Localized concentrations of CO are related to the levels of traffic and congestion along Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 16 ends

streets and at intersections. High levels of localized CO concentrations are only expected where background levels are high, and traffic volumes and congestion levels are high.

Emissions of CO are of potential concern, as the pollutant is a toxic gas that results from the incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels such as gasoline or wood. CO emissions are particularly related to traffic levels.

In order to provide a conservative indication of whether a project would result in localized CO emissions that would exceed the applicable threshold of significance, the PCAPCD has established screening criteria that if project operational CO emissions are below 550 lbs/day, the project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to localized CO emission concentrations. The maximum project CO emissions were estimated at 248 lbs/day for build out of all proposed project parcels, as included in the CalEEMod reports (see Appendix A). Therefore, based on PCAPCD’s screening criteria for localized CO emissions, the proposed project would not be expected to result in substantial levels of localized CO at surrounding intersections or generate localized concentrations of CO that would exceed standards or cause health effects. Consequently, the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe significant impacts to air quality related to localized CO emissions beyond what was already analyzed in the COMP and SVSP environmental documents, which found potential operation-related CO impacts to be significant and unavoidable in both the COMP and SVSP areas.

TAC Emissions
Another category of environmental concern is exposure to TACs. Health risks associated with TACs are a function of both the concentration of emissions and the duration of exposure, where the higher the concentration and/or the longer the period of time that a sensitive receptor is exposed to pollutant concentrations would correlate to a higher health risk. The CARB’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective (Handbook) provides recommended setback distances for sensitive land uses from major sources of TACs, including, but not limited to, freeways and high traffic roads, distribution centers, rail yards, and gas-dispensing facilities (GDFs).11 Implementation of the proposed project would result in emissions of TACs related to project construction. In addition, the proposed project would introduce new residential land uses on COMP parcel CO-52; thus, the proposed project could potentially result in exposure of such residents to TAC emissions associated with the nearby Roseville Energy Park (REP). Each source of TACs is discussed in further depth in the sections below.

Construction TACS
Short-term, construction-related activities could result in the generation of TACs, specifically diesel particulate matter (DPM), from on-road haul trucks and off-road equipment exhaust emissions. Construction is temporary and occurs over a relatively short duration in comparison to the operational lifetime of the proposed project. Health risks are typically associated with exposure to high concentrations of TACs over extended periods of time (e.g., 30 years or greater), whereas the construction period associated with the proposed project would likely be less than three years over the multiple parcels.

All construction equipment and operation thereof would be regulated in accordance with the In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation,12 which is intended to reduce emissions 11 CARB. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April 2005. 12 CARB. In-Use Off-Road Diesel Fueled Fleets Regulation. Available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ourwork/programs/use-road-diesel-fueled-fleets-regulation. Accessed July 28, 2023.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 17 ends

associated with off-road diesel vehicles and equipment, including DPM. Additionally, project construction would be required to comply with all applicable PCAPCD rules and all applicable construction mitigation measures listed in Appendix C of the CEQA Handbook, as noted previously.

Because construction equipment on-site would be used at varying locations over multiple project sites, associated emissions of DPM would not occur at the same location for extended periods of time. Due to the temporary nature of construction and the duration of potential exposure to associated emissions, the potential for any one sensitive receptor in the area to be exposed to large concentrations of pollutants for a substantially extended period of time would be low. Moreover, construction activities on the affected parcels are considered under full buildout of the currently approved SVSP and COMP and their associated CEQA documents, regardless of the proposed project. Thus, TAC emissions associated with construction of the parcels would be ostensibly the same as those that would occur under the approved plans and that were previously analyzed in the SVSP and COMP environmental documents. Accordingly, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations beyond what was already analyzed in the COMP and SVSP environmental documents, which likewise found potential construction-related TAC impacts to be less than significant in both the COMP and SVSP areas.

Operational TACS
The proposed project, consisting of residential land uses, is not considered a source of operational TAC emissions and, thus, would not impact nearby sensitive receptors.

Impacts of the environment on a project (as opposed to impacts of a project on the environment) are beyond the scope of required CEQA review.13 While not a CEQA consideration, due to the proximity of the proposed project site to the Roseville Energy Park (REP), the REP is being included for an informational discussion only.

A review of CARB’s Pollution Mapping Tool14 did not reveal any large TAC pollution sources within 1,000 feet of the proposed project parcels. The REP is located near the intersection of Westpark Drive and Phillip Road and is listed as a source of TACs, including benzene, DPM and formaldehyde. The REP is approximately three miles to the west of parcel CO-52 and one and one-half miles to the northeast of parcels WB-30 and WB-52.

The distances between the REP and the proposed project parcels are much farther than any of the recommended buffer distances in the Handbook; therefore, exposure to the future sensitive receptors on the site to TAC emissions associated with the REP would not occur.
13 “[T]he purpose of an EIR is to identify the significant effects of a project on the environment, not the significant effects of the environment on the project.” (Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. Town of Los Angeles, (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473 (Ballona).) The California Supreme Court recently held that “CEQA does not generally require an agency to consider the effects of existing environmental conditions on a proposed project’s future users or residents. What CEQA does mandate… is an analysis of how a project might exacerbate existing environmental hazards.” (California Building Industry Assn. v. Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist. (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, 392; see also Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Investment & Infrastructure (2016) 6 Cal.App.5th 160, 197 [“identifying the effects on the project and its users of locating the project in a particular environmental setting is neither consistent with CEQA's legislative purpose nor required by the CEQA statutes”], quoting Ballona, supra, 201 Cal.App.4th at p. 474.) In the case of the proposed project, the impact of placing future residents within area with odors is considered an existing environmental condition that would affect future users/residents. 14 CARB Pollution Mapping Tool. Available at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/carb-pollution-mapping-tool.

Accessed 8/3/2023.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 18 ends

Additionally, CARB’s Handbook recommends avoiding siting new sensitive land uses within 500 feet of a freeway, urban road with 100,000 vehicles/day, or rural roads with 50,000 vehicles/day. According to Appendix B of the Draft Technical Memorandum on Transportation Impact Analysis for Rezoning Various Parcels in the Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan, traffic volumes on Pleasant Grove and Westbrook boulevards are well below any levels of concern noted in the Handbook. Therefore, TAC exposure from roadway emissions would not create an impact to future residences of the proposed project.

Conclusion
Based on the above discussion, the proposed project would not expose any sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of localized CO or TACs associated with construction or operations of the proposed project. Thus, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations beyond what was already analyzed in the COMP and SVSP environmental documents.
d. According to the PCAPCD’s CEQA Handbook, odors can cause health symptoms such as nausea and headaches. PCAPCD is responsible for responding to odor complaints which can become a nuisance. Typical odor-generating land uses include, but are not limited to, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and composting facilities. Although the proposed project would not introduce any such land uses, construction activities may lead to odors.

Construction activities often include diesel-fueled equipment and heavy-duty diesel trucks, which can create odors associated with diesel fumes, which could be found to be objectionable. However, as discussed above, construction activities would be temporary.

Project construction would also be required to comply with all applicable PCAPCD rules and construction mitigation measures. The aforementioned regulations would help to minimize air pollutant emissions, as well as any associated odors. Furthermore, construction activities on the proposed project parcels are anticipated under full buildout of the currently approved SVSP and COMP, regardless of the proposed project. Thus, substantial objectionable odors would not occur during construction activities beyond what could already occur under the approved plans and were previously analyzed in the SVSP and COMP environmental documents.

As previously discussed, the Pleasant Grove WWTP is located near the intersection of Westpark Drive and Phillip Road. Impacts of the environment on a project (as opposed to impacts of a project on the environment) are beyond the scope of required CEQA review (see footnote 12). While not a CEQA consideration, due to the proximity of the proposed project site to the WWTP, the WWTP is being included for an informational discussion only.

Parcel CO-52, currently zoned for industrial/business park, is being proposed for residential uses. Parcel WB-52, currently zoned for park use, is being proposed for residential uses. Parcel CO-52 is approximately three miles to the east of the WWTP.

Parcels WB-30 (residential use) and WB-52 are about one and one-half miles to the southwest of the WWTP. Distance and wind direction are factors in determining if a Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 19 ends

potential odor source could impact its neighbors. According to the Windy.App website,15 the prevailing wind direction in Roseville is from the south and southeast. Although the WWTP is within two miles of the proposed project site (parcels noted are the closest to the WWTP in the proposed project), the prevailing wind direction would disperse any odors away from the proposed project parcels. Therefore, the WWTP is not expected to create an odor impact for the new proposed residential parcels. Furthermore, because parcel WB-30 is already zoned for residential use, the proposed project would not result in any changes related to odor impacts previously anticipated and analyzed in the COMP and SVSP environmental documents.

Conclusion
For the aforementioned reasons, construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts from emissions (such as those leading to odors and dust) adversely affecting a substantial number of people beyond what was previously analyzed in the COMP and SVSP environmental documents, which likewise found potential operational odor impacts to be less than significant in both the COMP and SVSP areas.
15 Windy.App. Available at: https://windy.app/forecast2/spot/469575/Roseville+CA/statistics. Accessed July 30, 2023.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 20 ends

VIII. Greenhouse Gases
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in Prior
Environmental
Documents.

Do
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Prior
Environmental
Documents’
Mitigation
Measures
Implemented or
Addressing
Impacts.
a) Generate greenhouse
gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly,
that may have a
significant impact on
the environment?
COMP
1st,
Addendum16
Pages 93-95
SVSP

4.5-1
No No No Yes
b) Conflict with an
applicable plan,
policy, or regulation
adopted for the
purpose of reducing
the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
COMP
1st
Addendum

Page 95 ends

SVSP

4.5-2
No No No None required
Discussion
a.b. Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. Therefore, the cumulative global emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change can be attributed to every nation, region, and city, and virtually every individual on Earth. An individual project’s GHG emissions are at a micro-scale level relative to global emissions and effects to global climate change; however, an individual project could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to a significant cumulative macro-scale impact. As such, impacts related to emissions of GHG are inherently considered cumulative impacts.

Implementation of the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to increases of GHG emissions. Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of carbon dioxide (CO2) and, to a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) associated with area sources, mobile sources or vehicles, utilities (electricity), water usage, wastewater generation, and the generation of solid waste. The primary source of GHG emissions for the project would be mobile source emissions. The common unit of measurement for GHG is expressed in terms of annual metric tons of CO2 equivalents (MTCO2e/yr). 16 Roseville, City of, Addendum and Initial Study of Environmental Significance, Campus Oaks Master Plan Amendment – General Plan Amendment, Rezone, Development Agreement Amendments – File #PL14-037 and File #PL14-0374. July 6, 2015. Available at https://cdnsm5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Development%20Services /Planning/Environmental%20Documents%20and%20Public%20Notices/Private%20Development%20Projects/Ca mpus%20Oaks/Campus%20Oaks%20Addendum%2007.07.2015%20CLEAN.pdf. Accessed August 8, 2023.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 21 ends

The proposed project is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of PCAPCD. The most recent PCAPCD CEQA Handbook released in October 201617 includes GHG screening thresholds, bright line thresholds, and per capita thresholds for GHG emissions.

PCAPCD’s California Environmental Quality Act Thresholds of Significance Justification Report18 considered GHG thresholds adopted by other air districts, historical CEQA projects reviewed by PCAPCD between 2003-2015, applicable statewide regulatory requirements by 2030 and special geographic features in Placer County when developing the thresholds of significance. The applicable thresholds are shown in Table 7.

Table 7
PCAPCD GHG Thresholds of Significance
GHG Emissions (MTCO2e/yr or
efficiency metric where noted)
Construction Bright Line 10,000
Operational De minimis 1,100
Operational Bright Line 10,000
Operational Residential Urban
Efficiency Metric 4.5/capita
Operational Non-Residential Urban
Efficiency Metric 26.5/1,000 square foot
Source: PCAPCD CEQA Handbook. October 2016.

Construction GHG Emissions
The proposed project’s construction GHG emissions have been estimated using CalEEMod under the same assumptions discussed in the Air Quality section of this document (see Appendix A). A direct comparison of the maximum annual unmitigated construction GHG emissions associated with the proposed project to the construction GHG emissions that could occur under the previously approved projects (baseline) is provided in Table 8 to support the current environmental review and to provide an abundance of information. Comparison to the PCAPCD’s GHG thresholds in Table 7 is also provided. Appendix B includes the baseline project CalEEMod reports.

As shown in the table, although the construction GHG emissions associated with the proposed project’s affected parcels are estimated to be higher than the same parcels under the baseline project, the emissions remain well below the applicable PCAPCD CEQA significance threshold. Nonetheless, because the proposed project is part of two previously approved larger projects, COMP and SVSP, the GHG (and other related) mitigation measures from the previous SVSP environmental documents remain applicable to the proposed project and would reduce emissions even further (SVSP EIR MM 4.4-1 [Dust and construction control measures], SVSP EIR MM 4.5-2 [Additional measures to reduce GHG emissions]).
17 PCAPCD. 2017 California Environmental Quality Act Handbook. October 2016. Available at:
https://www.placerair.org/1801/CEQA-Handbook. Accessed 7/27/2023 18 Placer County Air Pollution Control District. California Environmental Quality Act Thresholds of Significance Justification Report. October 2016. Available at: https://www.placer.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2061/ThresholdJustification-Report-PDF?bidId=. Accessed 7/30/2023 Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 22 ends

Table 8
Construction GHG Emissions Comparison (MTCO2e/yr)
Scenario MTCO2e/yr
Baseline
COMP 378
SVSP 1,066
Total Baseline 1,444
with Proposed Project
COMP 589
SVSP 1,445
Total Proposed Project 2,034
CHANGE FROM BASELINE +590
Threshold of Significance 10,000
Exceed Current Threshold? No
Exceed Prior Impact Conclusions No
Source: CalEEMod, July and August 2023 (see Appendices A and B).

It should be noted that the COMP environmental document did not previously analyze GHG impacts. As described in the Addendum and Initial Study of Environmental Significance, Campus Oaks Master Plan Amendment – General Plan Amendment, Rezone, Development Agreement Amendments – File #PL14-037 and File #PL14-0374, July 2015,19 the potential environmental impact of GHG emissions was known or could have been known at the time of the certification of the 1996 COMP EIR, so does not constitute new circumstances or new information requiring a new EIR. The first COMP Amendment addendum confirms this finding, and cites case law that determined a new EIR is not required to be prepared due to the lack of GHG analysis in the previous applicable EIR, and does not preclude adoption of a future addendum to the previous applicable EIR.20 The first COMP Amendment addendum also includes GHG analysis and concludes that the standard measures required by PCAPCD would adequately offset GHG emissions resulting from development on specific Campus Oaks parcels, including Parcel CO-52.

Based on this analysis, proposed project construction would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to GHG emissions that have not been previously analyzed in the SVSP environmental document or the first COMP Amendment addendum. In addition, the analysis of construction GHG emissions herein for the COMP parcel concludes that the GHG emissions from construction of the COMP parcel as proposed would not exceed the applicable PCAPCD’s GHG construction threshold and, therefore, would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment or conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Accordingly, construction of the proposed project would not create new or substantially more severe impacts related to construction GHG emissions than what could occur under buildout of 19 Roseville, City of, Addendum and Initial Study of Environmental Significance, Campus Oaks Master Plan Amendment – General Plan Amendment, Rezone, Development Agreement Amendments – File #PL14-037 and File #PL14-0374. July 6, 2015. Available at https://cdnsm5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Development%20Services /Planning/Environmental%20Documents%20and%20Public%20Notices/Private%20Development%20Projects/Ca mpus%20Oaks/Campus%20Oaks%20Addendum%2007.07.2015%20CLEAN.pdf. Accessed August 8, 2023. 20 Ibid. Pages 92-93.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 23 ends

the currently approved COMP and SVSP.

Operational GHG Emissions
The operational GHG emissions resulting from implementation of the proposed project have been estimated using CalEEMod (see Appendix A), including project-specific trip generation rates from the Draft Technical Memorandum on Transportation Impact Analysis for Rezoning Various Parcels in the Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan. The results are reported in Table 9.

Table 9
Proposed Project Unmitigated Annual Operational GHG
Emissions (MTCO2e/yr)
Source COMP SVSP Total with Proposed Project
Area 3.54 9.98 13.52
Energy 433.00 1,221.00 1,654.00
Mobile 2,140.00 5,639.00 7,779.00
Waste 65.80 185.00 250.80
Water 17.30 48.80 66.10
Refrigeration 0.32 0.91 1.23
Total Annual
Operational GHG
Emissions
2,659.96 7,104.69 9,764.65
Population 744 2,096 2,840
Source: CalEEMod, July 2023 (see Appendix A).

Project emissions are compared to the PCAPCD’s GHG thresholds to determine significance. The proposed project’s operational emissions exceed the de minimis threshold of 1,100 MTCO2e/yr but are under the 10,000 MTCO2e/yr bright line threshold.

Thus, pursuant to the PCAPCD’s CEQA Handbook, the emissions are further compared to the residential efficiency metric for urban areas of Placer County, which is 4.5 MTCO2e/capita. CalEEMod estimated the population from the proposed overall project as 2,840 people. The proposed project’s emissions per capita are estimated to be 3.44 MTCO2e/capita, which is below the PCAPCD’s efficiency metric threshold for residential urban projects. A review of the efficiency metric for the COMP and SVSP components separately results in emissions per capita for the COMP of 3.58 MTCO2e/capita and for the SVSP of 3.39 MTCO2e/capita, which are both below the PCAPCD’s efficiency metric threshold for residential urban projects.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts related to GHG emissions than what could occur under buildout of the currently approved SVSP or COMP projects. As noted above, the COMP environmental document did not explicitly analyze GHG impacts previously. However, the potential environmental impact of GHG emissions was known or could have been known at the time of the certification of the 1996 COMP EIR, so does not constitute new circumstances or new information requiring a new EIR (see additional explanation above). Furthermore, the analysis of operational GHG emissions herein for the COMP parcel concludes that the GHG emissions from the operation of the COMP parcel as proposed would not exceed the applicable PCAPCD’s operational GHG thresholds and, therefore, would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 24 ends

environment or conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Accordingly, operation of the proposed project would not create new or substantially more severe impacts related to GHG emissions than what could occur under buildout of the currently approved COMP and SVSP.

In addition, a direct comparison of the operational GHG emissions associated with the proposed project’s affected parcels to operational GHG emissions that could occur from the same parcels under the previously approved projects (baseline) is provided in Table 10 to support the current environmental review and to provide an abundance of information. Appendix B includes the baseline project CalEEMod reports.

Table 10
Operational GHG Emissions Comparison (MTCO2e/yr)
Scenario MTCO2e/yr
Baseline
COMP 3,561
SVSP 5,016
Total Baseline 8,577
with Proposed Project
COMP 2,660
SVSP 7,105
Total Proposed Project 9,765
CHANGE FROM BASELINE +1,188
Threshold of Significance 1,100 de minimis, 10,000 bright line Exceed de minimus Threshold?
Exceed bright-line threshold?
Yes
No
Exceed Prior Impact Conclusions No
Proposed project values have been rounded and, thus, are not identical to the values in Table 9.

Source: CalEEMod, July and August 2023 (see Appendices A and B).

A review of the efficiency metric for the baseline COMP and SVSP components separately result in 23.74 MTCO2e/square foot and in 3.58 MTCO2e/capita, respectively, which are both below the PCAPCD’s efficiency metric threshold for non-residential and residential urban projects, respectively.

Although the proposed project’s affected parcels’ operational GHG emissions are estimated to be higher than the same parcels under the baseline project, as discussed above, the emissions remain below the applicable PCAPCD CEQA bright-line significance threshold. Nonetheless, because the proposed project is part of two previously approved larger projects, COMP and SVSP, the GHG mitigation measures from the SVSP previous environmental document (listed above) remain applicable to the proposed project and would reduce GHG emissions even further, ensuring the GHG emissions from the proposed project would not create a new or substantial increase in the severity of GHG impacts of the previously approved projects.

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Land Use Amendments Project in Western Roseville Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Page 25 ends

Conclusion
Based on the above, construction and operation of the proposed project would not create new or substantially more severe impacts related to GHG emissions than what could occur under buildout of the existing approved projects. Additionally, the GHG impacts have been previously analyzed in the currently approved COMP and SVSP.

Appendix A
CalEEMod Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas
Modeling Results
Proposed Project
(COMP and SVSP separately)
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 1 / 36
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 2 / 36

3.9. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated

3.11. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated

3.13. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 3 / 36

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 4 / 36

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 5 / 36

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only)
Construction Start Date 6/1/2024
Operational Year 2028
Lead Agency City of Roseville
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.50
Precipitation (days) 7.80
Location 38.77562705656766, -121.40023406585973
County Placer-Sacramento
City Roseville
Air District Placer County APCD
Air Basin Sacramento Valley
TAZ 432
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Roseville Electric
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.16

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 6 / 36
Apartments Mid Rise 285 Dwelling Unit 13.7 273,600 1.00 — 744 CO-52 Parking Lot 456 Space 4.00 0.00 1.00 — — minimum spaces 1.5 plus 1/10 units
guests

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 9.13 36.0 33.9 0.06 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 6,826 6,826 0.27 0.26 13.2 6,852 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 10.2 20.8 34.4 0.04 0.82 2.86 3.68 0.76 0.68 1.44 — 7,484 7,484 0.23 0.27 0.34 7,570 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 5.53 8.09 14.6 0.02 0.33 2.12 2.45 0.30 0.77 1.08 — 3,511 3,511 0.09 0.15 3.08 3,559 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.01 1.48 2.66 < 0.005 0.06 0.39 0.45 0.06 0.14 0.20 — 581 581 0.02 0.02 0.51 589 Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 82.0 82.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 7 / 36
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — Yes
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 82.0 82.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — Yes
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10,000
Unmit. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — No

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 15.5 6.71 74.2 0.14 0.19 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.91 3.09 132 16,322 16,453 13.9 0.63 39.0 17,027 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 13.2 7.49 49.7 0.13 0.18 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.91 3.09 132 15,110 15,241 14.0 0.68 2.92 15,796 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 13.9 7.18 56.9 0.13 0.19 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.90 3.08 132 15,373 15,504 14.0 0.65 17.9 16,066 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.54 1.31 10.4 0.02 0.03 2.08 2.11 0.03 0.53 0.56 21.8 2,545 2,567 2.31 0.11 2.97 2,660 Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 9 / 36
Threshold — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,100
Unmit. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Yes

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 7.57 5.57 57.6 0.13 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.91 3.01 — 13,647 13,647 0.49 0.56 37.0 13,864 Area 7.88 0.15 16.2 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 43.2 43.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 43.4 Energy 0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 2,604 2,604 0.24 0.02 — 2,616 Water — — — — — — — — — — 17.9 27.4 45.3 1.84 0.04 — 105 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 114 0.00 114 11.4 0.00 — 397
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Total 15.5 6.71 74.2 0.14 0.19 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.91 3.09 132 16,322 16,453 13.9 0.63 39.0 17,027 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 6.65 6.50 49.2 0.12 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.91 3.01 — 12,478 12,478 0.57 0.61 0.96 12,676 Area 6.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 2,604 2,604 0.24 0.02 — 2,616 Water — — — — — — — — — — 17.9 27.4 45.3 1.84 0.04 — 105 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 114 0.00 114 11.4 0.00 — 397
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Total 13.2 7.49 49.7 0.13 0.18 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.91 3.09 132 15,110 15,241 14.0 0.68 2.92 15,796 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 6.70 6.11 48.5 0.12 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.90 2.99 — 12,720 12,720 0.53 0.59 16.0 12,925 SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 10 / 36
Area 7.16 0.08 7.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 21.3 21.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 21.4 Energy 0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 2,604 2,604 0.24 0.02 — 2,616 Water — — — — — — — — — — 17.9 27.4 45.3 1.84 0.04 — 105 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 114 0.00 114 11.4 0.00 — 397
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Total 13.9 7.18 56.9 0.13 0.19 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.90 3.08 132 15,373 15,504 14.0 0.65 17.9 16,066 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.22 1.12 8.85 0.02 0.02 2.08 2.10 0.02 0.53 0.55 — 2,106 2,106 0.09 0.10 2.65 2,140 Area 1.31 0.01 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 3.53 3.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.54 Energy 0.01 0.18 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 431 431 0.04 < 0.005 — 433 Water — — — — — — — — — — 2.97 4.53 7.51 0.31 0.01 — 17.3 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 18.8 0.00 18.8 1.88 0.00 — 65.8 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
Total 2.54 1.31 10.4 0.02 0.03 2.08 2.11 0.03 0.53 0.56 21.8 2,545 2,567 2.31 0.11 2.97 2,660

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60 — 1.60 1.47 — 1.47 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 11 / 36
Dust————— 19.7 19.7— 10.1 10.1———————
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.99 0.90 < 0.005 0.04— 0.04 0.04— 0.04— 145 145 0.01 < 0.005— 146 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 0.54 0.54— 0.28 0.28———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.18 0.16 < 0.005 0.01— 0.01 0.01— 0.01— 24.0 24.0 < 0.005 < 0.005— 24.1 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 0.10 0.10— 0.05 0.05———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.07 0.05 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04— 199 199 < 0.005 0.01 0.78— Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 12 / 36
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.95 4.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.82 0.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.3. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 9.20 9.20 — 3.65 3.65 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 13 / 36
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.29 2.82 2.48 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 542 542 0.02 < 0.005 — 544 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.76 0.76 — 0.30 0.30 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.51 0.45 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 89.8 89.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 90.1 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.14 0.14 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.05 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 228 228 < 0.005 0.01 0.89 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.0 17.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 14 / 36
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.81 2.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.37 3.45 4.03 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 737 737 0.03 0.01 — 739 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 15 / 36
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.63 0.74 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 122 122 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 122 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.81 0.53 11.4 0.00 0.00 2.07 2.07 0.00 0.49 0.49 — 2,336 2,336 0.03 0.08 9.12 — Vendor 0.03 1.22 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.24 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 883 883 0.01 0.14 2.30 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.64 0.68 8.34 0.00 0.00 2.07 2.07 0.00 0.49 0.49 — 2,062 2,062 0.05 0.08 0.24 — Vendor 0.02 1.31 0.32 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.24 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 883 883 0.01 0.14 0.06 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.22 0.18 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.15 0.15 — 651 651 0.01 0.03 1.21 — Vendor 0.01 0.39 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 271 271 < 0.005 0.04 0.30 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 108 108 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 — Vendor < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 44.9 44.9 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 16 / 36
Onsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43— 0.43 0.40— 0.40— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43— 0.43 0.40— 0.40— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.65 6.01 7.50 0.01 0.25— 0.25 0.23— 0.23— 1,379 1,379 0.06 0.01— 1,384 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 1.10 1.37 < 0.005 0.05— 0.05 0.04— 0.04— 228 228 0.01 < 0.005— 229 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.71 0.46 10.7 0.00 0.00 2.07 2.07 0.00 0.49 0.49— 2,289 2,289 0.03 0.08 8.24— Vendor 0.03 1.15 0.30 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.24 0.01 0.06 0.07— 868 868 0.01 0.13 2.28— Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 17 / 36
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.62 0.61 7.79 0.00 0.00 2.07 2.07 0.00 0.49 0.49 — 2,021 2,021 0.05 0.08 0.21 — Vendor 0.02 1.24 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.24 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 868 868 0.01 0.13 0.06 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.35 0.31 4.60 0.00 0.00 1.19 1.19 0.00 0.28 0.28 — 1,195 1,195 0.02 0.05 2.05 — Vendor 0.01 0.70 0.18 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 499 499 < 0.005 0.07 0.57 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 198 198 < 0.005 0.01 0.34 — Vendor < 0.005 0.13 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 82.7 82.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.09 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.9. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.80 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 — 0.35 0.32 — 0.32 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving 0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 18 / 36
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.41 0.55 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 82.8 82.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 83.1 Paving 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.07 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.7 13.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.8 Paving 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 148 148 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.32 8.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.38 1.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 19 / 36
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.11. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

6.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

6.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.23 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 33.7 33.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.8 SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 20 / 36
Architectu 1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ral
Coatings
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.58 5.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.60 Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.16 0.11 2.29 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 467 467 0.01 0.02 1.82 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.13 0.14 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 412 412 0.01 0.02 0.05 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 107 107 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 21 / 36
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.7 17.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.13. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

6.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

6.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.56 0.72 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 84.1 84.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 84.4 SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 22 / 36
Architectu
Coatings

4.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.10 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.9 13.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.0 Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.14 0.09 2.14 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 458 458 0.01 0.02 1.65 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.12 1.56 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 404 404 0.01 0.02 0.04 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 262 262 < 0.005 0.01 0.45 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 43.3 43.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 — SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 23 / 36
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

7.57 5.57 57.6 0.13 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.91 3.01 — 13,647 13,647 0.49 0.56 37.0 13,864 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 7.57 5.57 57.6 0.13 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.91 3.01 — 13,647 13,647 0.49 0.56 37.0 13,864 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

6.65 6.50 49.2 0.12 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.91 3.01 — 12,478 12,478 0.57 0.61 0.96 12,676 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 6.65 6.50 49.2 0.12 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.91 3.01 — 12,478 12,478 0.57 0.61 0.96 12,676 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

1.22 1.12 8.85 0.02 0.02 2.08 2.10 0.02 0.53 0.55 — 2,106 2,106 0.09 0.10 2.65 2,140 SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 24 / 36
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.22 1.12 8.85 0.02 0.02 2.08 2.10 0.02 0.53 0.55 — 2,106 2,106 0.09 0.10 2.65 2,140

4.2. Energy

0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,260 1,260 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,263 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,260 1,260 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,263 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,260 1,260 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,263 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,260 1,260 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,263 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.01 0.18 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 209 209 0.02 < 0.005 — 209 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.01 0.18 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 209 209 0.02 < 0.005 — 209

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 26 / 36

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

5.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

1.41 0.15 16.2 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 43.2 43.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 43.4 Total 7.88 0.15 16.2 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 43.2 43.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 43.4 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

5.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 6.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 27 / 36
Consume 1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
r
Products
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.13 0.01 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.53 3.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.54 Total 1.31 0.01 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 3.53 3.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.54

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 30 / 36

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/1/2024 6/14/2024 5.00 10.0 — Grading Grading 6/15/2024 7/26/2024 5.00 30.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 7/28/2024 10/21/2025 5.00 322 — Paving Paving 10/7/2025 11/3/2025 5.00 20.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/25/2024 11/18/2025 5.00 322 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 31 / 36
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 205 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 30.5 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 32 / 36
Paving Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 41.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 554,040 184,680 0.00 0.00 10,454

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation — — 15.0 0.00 —
Grading — — 90.0 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 33 / 36
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
Parking Lot 4.00 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 446 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 391 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Mid Rise 1,852 1,852 1,852 676,162 16,092 16,092 16,092 5,873,639 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 34 / 36
Gas Fireplaces 86
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 200
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
554040 184,680 0.00 0.00 10,454

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 1,287,576 341 0.0330 0.0040 3,930,860 Parking Lot 152,634 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 35 / 36

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 9,366,931 14.1
Parking Lot 0.00 11.5

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 211 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use CO52 only run
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 36 / 36
Construction: Construction Phases no demo. adjusted arch coatings to start 2 weeks after start of building construction and last same # of days. no applicant questionnaire for construction.

Operations: Vehicle Data using Roseville trip rates from F&P transportation impact analysis dated 7/25/23.

SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 1 / 42
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 2 / 42

3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.11. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated

3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated

3.15. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

3.17. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 3 / 42

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 4 / 42

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 5 / 42

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Construction Start Date 6/1/2024
Operational Year 2028
Lead Agency City of Roseville
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.50
Precipitation (days) 7.80
Location 38.77562705656766, -121.40023406585973
County Placer-Sacramento
City Roseville
Air District Placer County APCD
Air Basin Sacramento Valley
TAZ 432
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Roseville Electric
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.16

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 6 / 42
Apartments Mid Rise 355 Dwelling Unit 2.95 340,800 1.00 — 927 WB-30 Apartments Mid Rise 192 Dwelling Unit 2.34 184,320 1.00 — 501 WB-32 Apartments Mid Rise 256 Dwelling Unit 3.35 245,760 1.00 — 668 FD-34 City Park 1.50 Acre 1.50 0.00 1.00 1.00 — park
Parking Lot 1,258 Space 11.3 0.00 1.00 — — minimum spaces 1.5 plus 1/10 units
guests

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 20.8 36.0 53.8 0.06 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 12,917 12,917 0.27 0.68 37.3 13,163 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 20.3 18.1 43.4 0.04 0.56 7.64 8.21 0.52 1.82 2.34 — 11,992 11,992 0.29 0.68 0.97 12,204 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 14.3 11.8 30.1 0.03 0.35 5.43 5.78 0.33 1.29 1.62 — 8,570 8,570 0.18 0.48 10.6 8,727 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.62 2.16 5.48 0.01 0.06 0.99 1.06 0.06 0.24 0.30 — 1,419 1,419 0.03 0.08 1.75 1,445 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 7 / 42
Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 82.0 82.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — Yes
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 82.0 82.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — Yes
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10,000
Unmit. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — No

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 20.8 36.0 53.8 0.06 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 12,917 12,917 0.27 0.68 37.3 13,163 2025 20.4 16.1 51.2 0.04 0.49 7.64 8.14 0.46 1.82 2.27 — 12,714 12,714 0.23 0.65 34.3 12,948 2026 — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 20.3 18.1 43.4 0.04 0.56 7.64 8.21 0.52 1.82 2.34 — 11,992 11,992 0.29 0.68 0.97 12,204 2025 20.1 16.9 41.4 0.04 0.49 7.64 8.14 0.46 1.82 2.27 — 11,811 11,811 0.28 0.67 0.89 12,017 2026 19.9 15.8 39.7 0.04 0.44 7.64 8.08 0.40 1.82 2.22 — 11,631 11,631 0.26 0.67 0.80 11,837 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 8 / 42
2027 2.13 6.98 10.5 0.01 0.30 0.15 0.45 0.27 0.04 0.31 — 1,653 1,653 0.06 0.02 0.01 1,660 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 6.03 9.50 16.8 0.02 0.35 3.66 4.01 0.32 1.16 1.48 — 4,367 4,367 0.11 0.21 4.75 4,436 2025 14.3 11.8 30.1 0.03 0.35 5.43 5.78 0.33 1.29 1.62 — 8,570 8,570 0.18 0.48 10.6 8,727 2026 0.55 0.09 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 81.3 81.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 82.6 2027 0.13 0.42 0.63 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 — 99.9 99.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 100 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 1.10 1.73 3.06 < 0.005 0.06 0.67 0.73 0.06 0.21 0.27 — 723 723 0.02 0.03 0.79 734 2025 2.62 2.16 5.48 0.01 0.06 0.99 1.06 0.06 0.24 0.30 — 1,419 1,419 0.03 0.08 1.75 1,445 2026 0.10 0.02 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.5 13.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.7 2027 0.02 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 16.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 16.6

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 42.6 18.1 201 0.38 0.52 30.6 31.1 0.50 7.78 8.28 371 44,026 44,397 39.2 1.68 104 45,983 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 36.2 20.2 133 0.35 0.50 30.6 31.1 0.49 7.78 8.27 371 40,779 41,150 39.4 1.82 8.09 42,684 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 38.0 19.1 152 0.35 0.51 30.0 30.5 0.49 7.63 8.12 371 40,998 41,369 39.3 1.73 47.6 42,913 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 9 / 42
Unmit. 6.93 3.49 27.6 0.06 0.09 5.48 5.57 0.09 1.39 1.48 61.4 6,788 6,849 6.50 0.29 7.89 7,105 Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,100
Unmit. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Yes

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 20.2 14.9 154 0.36 0.28 30.6 30.9 0.26 7.78 8.04 — 36,488 36,488 1.32 1.51 98.9 37,069 Area 22.2 0.43 45.6 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 0.00 122 122 0.01 < 0.005 — 122 Energy 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 7,340 7,340 0.68 0.05 — 7,372 Water — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Total 42.6 18.1 201 0.38 0.52 30.6 31.1 0.50 7.78 8.28 371 44,026 44,397 39.2 1.68 104 45,983 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 10 / 42
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Mobile 17.8 17.4 132 0.33 0.28 30.6 30.9 0.26 7.78 8.04 — 33,362 33,362 1.52 1.64 2.57 33,892 Area 18.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 7,340 7,340 0.68 0.05 — 7,372 Water — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Total 36.2 20.2 133 0.35 0.50 30.6 31.1 0.49 7.78 8.27 371 40,779 41,150 39.4 1.82 8.09 42,684 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 17.6 16.1 128 0.33 0.27 30.0 30.3 0.26 7.63 7.89 — 33,521 33,521 1.39 1.55 42.1 34,061 Area 20.2 0.21 22.5 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 60.1 60.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 60.3 Energy 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 7,340 7,340 0.68 0.05 — 7,372 Water — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Total 38.0 19.1 152 0.35 0.51 30.0 30.5 0.49 7.63 8.12 371 40,998 41,369 39.3 1.73 47.6 42,913 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 3.22 2.94 23.3 0.06 0.05 5.48 5.53 0.05 1.39 1.44 — 5,550 5,550 0.23 0.26 6.97 5,639 Area 3.68 0.04 4.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 9.94 9.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.98 Energy 0.03 0.51 0.22 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 1,215 1,215 0.11 0.01 — 1,221 Water — — — — — — — — — — 8.37 12.8 21.1 0.86 0.02 — 48.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 53.0 0.00 53.0 5.30 0.00 — 185 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.91 0.91
Total 6.93 3.49 27.6 0.06 0.09 5.48 5.57 0.09 1.39 1.48 61.4 6,788 6,849 6.50 0.29 7.89 7,105 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 11 / 42

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60 — 1.60 1.47 — 1.47 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 19.7 19.7 — 10.1 10.1 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.99 0.90 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 145 145 0.01 < 0.005 — 146 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.54 0.54 — 0.28 0.28 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.18 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 24.0 24.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.1 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 12 / 42
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.10 0.10 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.05 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 199 199 < 0.005 0.01 0.78 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.95 4.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.82 0.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.3. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 13 / 42
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45— 1.45 1.33— 1.33— 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05— 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 9.20 9.20— 3.65 3.65———————
Onsite
truck

0.34 3.29 2.89 0.01 0.14— 0.14 0.13— 0.13— 633 633 0.03 0.01— 635 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 0.88 0.88— 0.35 0.35———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.60 0.53 < 0.005 0.03— 0.03 0.02— 0.02— 105 105 < 0.005 < 0.005— 105 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 0.16 0.16— 0.06 0.06———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Offsite—————————————————
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 14 / 42
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Worker 0.08 0.05 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 228 228 < 0.005 0.01 0.89 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.8 19.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.28 3.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 15 / 42
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50— 0.50 0.46— 0.46— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.36 3.32 3.88 0.01 0.15— 0.15 0.14— 0.14— 708 708 0.03 0.01— 711 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.61 0.71 < 0.005 0.03— 0.03 0.02— 0.02— 117 117 < 0.005 < 0.005— 118 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 2.28 1.49 32.2 0.00 0.00 5.84 5.84 0.00 1.37 1.37— 6,581 6,581 0.09 0.23 25.7— Vendor 0.07 3.43 0.89 0.02 0.03 0.63 0.67 0.03 0.18 0.21— 2,488 2,488 0.02 0.38 6.48— Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 1.81 1.93 23.5 0.00 0.00 5.84 5.84 0.00 1.37 1.37— 5,810 5,810 0.14 0.23 0.67— Vendor 0.07 3.68 0.91 0.02 0.03 0.63 0.67 0.03 0.18 0.21— 2,489 2,489 0.02 0.38 0.17— Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Average
Daily
—————————————————
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 16 / 42
Worker 0.59 0.50 7.13 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,764 1,764 0.03 0.07 3.28 — Vendor 0.02 1.07 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 735 735 0.01 0.11 0.82 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.09 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.07 0.07 — 292 292 0.01 0.01 0.54 — Vendor < 0.005 0.19 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 122 122 < 0.005 0.02 0.14 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.80 7.46 9.31 0.02 0.31 — 0.31 0.28 — 0.28 — 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01 — 1,719 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 17 / 42
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — truck
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 1.36 1.70 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.00 1.29 30.1 0.00 0.00 5.84 5.84 0.00 1.37 1.37 — 6,448 6,448 0.09 0.22 23.2 — Vendor 0.07 3.25 0.85 0.02 0.03 0.63 0.67 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 2,445 2,445 0.02 0.36 6.43 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.74 1.72 22.0 0.00 0.00 5.84 5.84 0.00 1.37 1.37 — 5,695 5,695 0.13 0.23 0.60 — Vendor 0.07 3.49 0.88 0.02 0.03 0.63 0.67 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 2,446 2,446 0.02 0.36 0.17 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.24 1.07 16.1 0.00 0.00 4.15 4.15 0.00 0.97 0.97 — 4,180 4,180 0.07 0.17 7.17 — Vendor 0.05 2.44 0.62 0.01 0.02 0.45 0.47 0.02 0.12 0.15 — 1,747 1,747 0.02 0.26 1.99 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.23 0.20 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.00 0.18 0.18 — 692 692 0.01 0.03 1.19 — Vendor 0.01 0.44 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 289 289 < 0.005 0.04 0.33 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 18 / 42

3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.38 9.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.41 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.55 1.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.56 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 19 / 42
Worker 1.65 1.53 20.6 0.00 0.00 5.84 5.84 0.00 1.37 1.37 — 5,584 5,584 0.11 0.23 0.54 — Vendor 0.07 3.31 0.86 0.02 0.03 0.63 0.67 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 2,400 2,400 0.02 0.36 0.15 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.5 22.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 — Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.39 9.39 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.72 3.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.56 1.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.11. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 1.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 20 / 42
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.42 0.60 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 91.1 91.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 91.4 Paving 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.08 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.1 15.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.1 Paving 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 142 142 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.81 8.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.46 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 21 / 42

3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

16.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

16.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 35.8 35.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 35.9 Architectu
ral
Coatings

4.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 22 / 42
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.04 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.93 5.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.95 Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.46 0.30 6.45 0.00 0.00 1.17 1.17 0.00 0.27 0.27 — 1,316 1,316 0.02 0.05 5.14 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.36 0.39 4.70 0.00 0.00 1.17 1.17 0.00 0.27 0.27 — 1,162 1,162 0.03 0.05 0.13 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.09 1.29 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.07 0.07 — 320 320 0.01 0.01 0.60 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 53.0 53.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 23 / 42

3.15. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

16.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

16.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.63 0.81 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 95.4 95.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 95.7 Architectu
ral
Coatings

11.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 24 / 42
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.12 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 Architectu
ral
Coatings

2.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.40 0.26 6.03 0.00 0.00 1.17 1.17 0.00 0.27 0.27 — 1,290 1,290 0.02 0.04 4.64 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.35 0.34 4.39 0.00 0.00 1.17 1.17 0.00 0.27 0.27 — 1,139 1,139 0.03 0.05 0.12 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.21 3.22 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.00 0.19 0.19 — 836 836 0.01 0.03 1.43 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 138 138 < 0.005 0.01 0.24 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 25 / 42

3.17. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.86 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

16.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.18 4.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.19 Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.69 Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 26 / 42
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.33 0.31 4.13 0.00 0.00 1.17 1.17 0.00 0.27 0.27 — 1,117 1,117 0.02 0.05 0.11 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 35.9 35.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.95 5.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 27 / 42
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

20.2 14.9 154 0.36 0.28 30.6 30.8 0.26 7.77 8.03 — 36,452 36,452 1.32 1.51 98.8 37,032 City Park 0.01 0.01 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 36.6 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 20.2 14.9 154 0.36 0.28 30.6 30.9 0.26 7.78 8.04 — 36,488 36,488 1.32 1.51 98.9 37,069 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

17.8 17.4 132 0.33 0.28 30.6 30.8 0.26 7.77 8.03 — 33,330 33,330 1.52 1.64 2.56 33,859 City Park 0.01 0.02 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 32.9 32.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 33.4 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 17.8 17.4 132 0.33 0.28 30.6 30.9 0.26 7.78 8.04 — 33,362 33,362 1.52 1.64 2.57 33,892 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

3.22 2.94 23.3 0.06 0.05 5.47 5.52 0.05 1.39 1.44 — 5,547 5,547 0.23 0.26 6.97 5,636 City Park < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.92 2.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.96 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 3.22 2.94 23.3 0.06 0.05 5.48 5.53 0.05 1.39 1.44 — 5,550 5,550 0.23 0.26 6.97 5,639

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 28 / 42
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 3,387 3,387 0.33 0.04 — 3,407
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 403 403 0.04 < 0.005 — 406
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3,790 3,790 0.37 0.04 — 3,813 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 3,387 3,387 0.33 0.04 — 3,407
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 403 403 0.04 < 0.005 — 406
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3,790 3,790 0.37 0.04 — 3,813 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 561 561 0.05 0.01 — 564
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 66.8 66.8 0.01 < 0.005 — 67.2
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 628 628 0.06 0.01 — 631

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 29 / 42
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 3,549 3,549 0.31 0.01 — 3,559 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 3,549 3,549 0.31 0.01 — 3,559 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 3,549 3,549 0.31 0.01 — 3,559 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 3,549 3,549 0.31 0.01 — 3,559 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.03 0.51 0.22 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 588 588 0.05 < 0.005 — 589 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.03 0.51 0.22 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 588 588 0.05 < 0.005 — 589

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 30 / 42

16.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

3.97 0.43 45.6 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 122 122 0.01 < 0.005 — 122 Total 22.2 0.43 45.6 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 0.00 122 122 0.01 < 0.005 — 122 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

16.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 18.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 31 / 42
Consume 3.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
r
Products
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.36 0.04 4.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.94 9.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.98 Total 3.68 0.04 4.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 9.94 9.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.98

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 34 / 42
Apartmen — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
ts
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.91 0.91
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.91 0.91

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/1/2024 6/14/2024 5.00 10.0 — Grading Grading 6/15/2024 8/2/2024 5.00 35.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 8/3/2024 1/2/2026 5.00 370 — Paving Paving 1/3/2027 2/2/2027 5.00 22.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/17/2024 1/16/2026 5.00 370 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 35 / 42
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 36 / 42
Grading Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 578 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 85.8 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 116 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
City Park 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 11.3 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 528 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 528 0.03 < 0.005
2026 0.00 528 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 528 0.03 < 0.005
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 38 / 42

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Mid Rise 2,307 2,307 2,307 842,237 20,045 20,045 20,045 7,316,287 Apartments Mid Rise 1,248 1,248 1,248 455,520 10,841 10,841 10,841 3,956,978 Apartments Mid Rise 1,393 1,257 1,047 483,218 12,097 10,919 9,095 4,197,585 City Park 1.17 2.94 3.29 630 15.2 38.3 42.8 8,204
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 107
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 249
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 58
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 134
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 39 / 42
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 77
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 179
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 40 / 42

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 1,603,823 341 0.0330 0.0040 4,896,335 Apartments Mid Rise 867,420 341 0.0330 0.0040 2,648,158 Apartments Mid Rise 1,156,560 341 0.0330 0.0040 3,530,878 City Park 0.00 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 432,031 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 11,667,581 14.1
Apartments Mid Rise 6,310,354 14.1
Apartments Mid Rise 8,413,805 14.1
City Park 0.00 25.6
Parking Lot 0.00 11.5

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 263 —
Apartments Mid Rise 142 —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 41 / 42
Apartments Mid Rise 189 —
City Park 0.13 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
City Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
City Park Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/2/2023 42 / 42
Land Use Included lot acreage from applicant. reduced lot acreage to account for minimum amount of parking required by code. No landscaping area estimated (put in 1 sf to eliminated zeros and allow model to run without errors). SVSP only parcels.

Construction: Construction Phases no demo. adjusted arch coatings to start 2 weeks after start of building construction and last same # of days. no applicant questionnaire for construction.

Operations: Vehicle Data using Roseville trip rates from F&P transportation impact analysis dated 7/25/23.

Appendix B
CalEEMod Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas
Modeling Results
Baseline Project
(COMP and SVSP separately)
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
1 / 34
COMP (baseline) Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
2 / 34

3.9. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated

3.11. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

3.13. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
3 / 34

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
4 / 34

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
5 / 34

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name COMP (baseline)
Construction Start Date 6/1/2024
Operational Year 2028
Lead Agency City of Roseville
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.50
Precipitation (days) 7.80
Location 38.77562705656766, -121.40023406585973
County Placer-Sacramento
City Roseville
Air District Placer County APCD
Air Basin Sacramento Valley
TAZ 432
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Roseville Electric
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.16

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
6 / 34
Parking Lot 150 Space 1.35 0.00 1.00 — — minimum spaces 1.5 plus 1/10 units
guests
Industrial Park 150 1000sqft 15.7 150,000 1.00 — — BASELINE CO-52

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.71 36.0 33.9 0.06 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 6,826 6,826 0.27 0.15 4.66 6,852 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 44.4 12.5 15.9 0.03 0.51 0.82 1.33 0.47 0.20 0.67 — 3,744 3,744 0.12 0.15 0.12 3,793 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.26 8.27 9.73 0.02 0.35 1.53 1.87 0.32 0.63 0.95 — 2,255 2,255 0.07 0.09 1.11 2,284 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.60 1.51 1.77 < 0.005 0.06 0.28 0.34 0.06 0.12 0.17 — 373 373 0.01 0.01 0.18 378 Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 82.0 82.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
7 / 34
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — Yes
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 82.0 82.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — Yes
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10,000
Unmit. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — No

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 11.7 7.75 76.9 0.18 0.23 14.6 14.8 0.22 3.71 3.93 167 21,764 21,931 17.8 0.87 86.2 22,721 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 9.88 8.81 57.7 0.16 0.22 14.6 14.8 0.21 3.71 3.92 167 20,243 20,409 17.9 0.93 40.3 21,172 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 10.4 8.39 61.1 0.17 0.22 14.5 14.7 0.21 3.69 3.91 167 20,566 20,733 17.8 0.90 59.4 21,506 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.91 1.53 11.2 0.03 0.04 2.65 2.69 0.04 0.67 0.71 27.6 3,405 3,433 2.95 0.15 9.84 3,561 Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
9 / 34
Threshold — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,100
Unmit. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Yes

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 7.14 6.53 69.4 0.17 0.13 14.6 14.7 0.12 3.71 3.83 — 17,269 17,269 0.54 0.67 47.2 17,529 Area 4.53 0.05 6.52 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 26.8 26.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 26.9 Energy 0.06 1.16 0.98 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 4,367 4,367 0.41 0.04 — 4,388 Water — — — — — — — — — — 66.5 101 168 6.83 0.16 — 387
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 100 0.00 100 10.0 0.00 — 351
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 39.0 39.0
Total 11.7 7.75 76.9 0.18 0.23 14.6 14.8 0.22 3.71 3.93 167 21,764 21,931 17.8 0.87 86.2 22,721 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 6.36 7.64 56.7 0.15 0.13 14.6 14.7 0.12 3.71 3.83 — 15,774 15,774 0.60 0.73 1.22 16,007 Area 3.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.06 1.16 0.98 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 4,367 4,367 0.41 0.04 — 4,388 Water — — — — — — — — — — 66.5 101 168 6.83 0.16 — 387
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 100 0.00 100 10.0 0.00 — 351
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 39.0 39.0
Total 9.88 8.81 57.7 0.16 0.22 14.6 14.8 0.21 3.71 3.92 167 20,243 20,409 17.9 0.93 40.3 21,172 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 6.39 7.20 56.9 0.16 0.13 14.5 14.7 0.12 3.69 3.81 — 16,085 16,085 0.56 0.70 20.4 16,328 COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
10 / 34
Area 3.99 0.03 3.22 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.2 13.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.3 Energy 0.06 1.16 0.98 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 4,367 4,367 0.41 0.04 — 4,388 Water — — — — — — — — — — 66.5 101 168 6.83 0.16 — 387
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 100 0.00 100 10.0 0.00 — 351
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 39.0 39.0
Total 10.4 8.39 61.1 0.17 0.22 14.5 14.7 0.21 3.69 3.91 167 20,566 20,733 17.8 0.90 59.4 21,506 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.17 1.31 10.4 0.03 0.02 2.65 2.67 0.02 0.67 0.70 — 2,663 2,663 0.09 0.12 3.37 2,703 Area 0.73 < 0.005 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.19 2.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.20 Energy 0.01 0.21 0.18 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 723 723 0.07 0.01 — 727 Water — — — — — — — — — — 11.0 16.8 27.8 1.13 0.03 — 64.1 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 16.6 0.00 16.6 1.66 0.00 — 58.1 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.46 6.46
Total 1.91 1.53 11.2 0.03 0.04 2.65 2.69 0.04 0.67 0.71 27.6 3,405 3,433 2.95 0.15 9.84 3,561

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60 — 1.60 1.47 — 1.47 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
11 / 34
Dust————— 19.7 19.7— 10.1 10.1———————
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.10 0.99 0.90 < 0.005 0.04— 0.04 0.04— 0.04— 145 145 0.01 < 0.005— 146 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 0.54 0.54— 0.28 0.28———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.18 0.16 < 0.005 0.01— 0.01 0.01— 0.01— 24.0 24.0 < 0.005 < 0.005— 24.1 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 0.10 0.10— 0.05 0.05———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.07 0.05 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04— 199 199 < 0.005 0.01 0.78— Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
12 / 34
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.95 4.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.82 0.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 9.20 9.20 — 3.65 3.65 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
13 / 34
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.29 2.82 2.48 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 542 542 0.02 < 0.005 — 544 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.76 0.76 — 0.30 0.30 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.05 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 228 228 < 0.005 0.01 0.89 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.0 17.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
14 / 34
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.81 2.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 2.79 3.26 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 596 596 0.02 < 0.005 — 598 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
15 / 34
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.51 0.59 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 98.7 98.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 99.0 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.16 3.51 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.15 0.15 — 717 717 0.01 0.03 2.80 — Vendor 0.02 0.98 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 713 713 0.01 0.11 1.86 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.20 0.21 2.56 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.15 0.15 — 633 633 0.02 0.03 0.07 — Vendor 0.02 1.05 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 713 713 0.01 0.11 0.05 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 162 162 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 — Vendor 0.01 0.26 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 177 177 < 0.005 0.03 0.20 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 26.8 26.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 — Vendor < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 29.3 29.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
16 / 34
Onsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43— 0.43 0.40— 0.40— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43— 0.43 0.40— 0.40— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.65 6.01 7.50 0.01 0.25— 0.25 0.23— 0.23— 1,379 1,379 0.06 0.01— 1,384 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 1.10 1.37 < 0.005 0.05— 0.05 0.04— 0.04— 228 228 0.01 < 0.005— 229 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.22 0.14 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.15 0.15— 703 703 0.01 0.02 2.53— Vendor 0.02 0.93 0.24 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06— 700 700 0.01 0.10 1.84— Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
17 / 34
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.19 0.19 2.39 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.15 0.15 — 621 621 0.01 0.03 0.07 — Vendor 0.02 1.00 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 701 701 0.01 0.10 0.05 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.09 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 367 367 0.01 0.01 0.63 — Vendor 0.01 0.56 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 403 403 < 0.005 0.06 0.46 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 60.7 60.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 — Vendor < 0.005 0.10 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 66.7 66.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.80 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 — 0.35 0.32 — 0.32 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving 0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
18 / 34
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.41 0.55 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 82.8 82.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 83.1 Paving 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.07 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.7 13.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.8 Paving < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 148 148 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.32 8.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.38 1.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
19 / 34
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.11. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

44.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.32 7.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.34 Architectu
ral
Coatings

2.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 124 124 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.99 6.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.16 1.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.13. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
21 / 34
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06 — 1.06 0.98 — 0.98 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Demolitio
n
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 1.36 1.19 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 188 188 0.01 < 0.005 — 188 Demolitio
n
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.25 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 31.1 31.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.2 Demolitio
n
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.04 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 171 171 < 0.005 0.01 0.67 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
22 / 34
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.49 8.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.41 1.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Industrial
Park

7.14 6.53 69.4 0.17 0.13 14.6 14.7 0.12 3.71 3.83 — 17,269 17,269 0.54 0.67 47.2 17,529 Total 7.14 6.53 69.4 0.17 0.13 14.6 14.7 0.12 3.71 3.83 — 17,269 17,269 0.54 0.67 47.2 17,529 COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
23 / 34
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Industrial
Park

6.36 7.64 56.7 0.15 0.13 14.6 14.7 0.12 3.71 3.83 — 15,774 15,774 0.60 0.73 1.22 16,007 Total 6.36 7.64 56.7 0.15 0.13 14.6 14.7 0.12 3.71 3.83 — 15,774 15,774 0.60 0.73 1.22 16,007 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Industrial
Park

1.17 1.31 10.4 0.03 0.02 2.65 2.67 0.02 0.67 0.70 — 2,663 2,663 0.09 0.12 3.37 2,703 Total 1.17 1.31 10.4 0.03 0.02 2.65 2.67 0.02 0.67 0.70 — 2,663 2,663 0.09 0.12 3.37 2,703

4.2. Energy

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Industrial
Park

0.06 1.16 0.98 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,388 1,388 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,392 Total 0.06 1.16 0.98 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,388 1,388 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,392 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Industrial
Park

0.06 1.16 0.98 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,388 1,388 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,392 Total 0.06 1.16 0.98 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,388 1,388 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,392 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
25 / 34
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Industrial
Park

0.01 0.21 0.18 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 230 230 0.02 < 0.005 — 230 Total 0.01 0.21 0.18 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 230 230 0.02 < 0.005 — 230

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

3.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

1.07 0.05 6.52 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 26.8 26.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 26.9 Total 4.53 0.05 6.52 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 26.8 26.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 26.9 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consume
r
Products

3.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
26 / 34
Total 3.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consume
r
Products

0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.10 < 0.005 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.19 2.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.20 Total 0.73 < 0.005 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.19 2.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.20

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 39.0 39.0
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 39.0 39.0
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 39.0 39.0
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 39.0 39.0
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.46 6.46
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.46 6.46

5. Activity Data
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
29 / 34

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/30/2024 7/14/2024 5.00 10.0 — Grading Grading 7/15/2024 8/26/2024 5.00 30.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 8/27/2024 10/21/2025 5.00 300 — Paving Paving 10/22/2025 11/19/2025 5.00 20.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/20/2025 12/18/2025 5.00 20.0 — Demolition Demolition 6/1/2024 6/29/2024 5.00 20.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
30 / 34
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 63.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 24.6 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
31 / 34
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 12.6 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT
Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 15.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.6. Dust Mitigation
COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
32 / 34

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Parking Lot 1.35 100%
Industrial Park 0.00 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 528 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 528 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Industrial Park 1,575 1,575 1,575 574,875 20,522 20,522 20,522 7,490,620 COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
33 / 34

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Parking Lot 51,514 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Industrial Park 3,139,400 341 0.0330 0.0040 4,330,353

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) COMP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
34 / 34
Parking Lot 0.00 11.5
Industrial Park 34,687,500 11.5

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Industrial Park 186 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Industrial Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 0.30 4.00 4.00 18.0

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Included lot acreage from applicant. reduced lot acreage to account for minimum amount of parking required by code. No landscaping area estimated (put in 1 sf to eliminated zeros and allow model to run without errors).

Baseline CO-52.

Construction: Construction Phases no demo. adjusted arch coatings to start 2 weeks after start of building construction and last same # of days. no applicant questionnaire for construction.

Operations: Vehicle Data using Roseville trip rates from F&P transportation impact analysis dated 7/25/23.

SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
1 / 41
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
2 / 41

3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.11. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated

3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated

3.15. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

3.17. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
3 / 41

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
4 / 41

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
5 / 41

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name SVSP (baseline)
Construction Start Date 6/1/2024
Operational Year 2028
Lead Agency City of Roseville
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.50
Precipitation (days) 7.80
Location 38.77562705656766, -121.40023406585973
County Placer-Sacramento
City Roseville
Air District Placer County APCD
Air Basin Sacramento Valley
TAZ 432
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Roseville Electric
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.16

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
6 / 41
Apartments Mid Rise 237 Dwelling Unit 4.68 227,520 1.00 — 619 WB-30 Apartments Mid Rise 128 Dwelling Unit 3.28 122,880 1.00 — 334 WB-32 Apartments Mid Rise 172 Dwelling Unit 4.59 165,120 1.00 — 449 FD-34 City Park 1.50 Acre 1.50 0.00 1.00 1.00 — park
Parking Lot 859 Space 7.73 0.00 1.00 — — minimum spaces 1.5 plus 1/10 units
guests

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 14.4 36.0 40.7 0.06 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 9,476 9,476 0.27 0.46 25.0 9,644 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 14.0 16.1 33.7 0.04 0.55 5.11 5.66 0.51 1.22 1.73 — 8,858 8,858 0.23 0.46 0.65 9,003 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 9.89 10.6 23.5 0.03 0.34 3.63 3.98 0.32 0.99 1.30 — 6,330 6,330 0.14 0.32 7.08 6,437 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.81 1.93 4.28 < 0.005 0.06 0.66 0.73 0.06 0.18 0.24 — 1,048 1,048 0.02 0.05 1.17 1,066 SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
7 / 41
Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 82.0 82.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — Yes
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 82.0 82.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — Yes
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10,000
Unmit. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — No

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 14.4 36.0 40.7 0.06 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 9,476 9,476 0.27 0.46 25.0 9,644 2025 14.1 14.5 38.9 0.04 0.48 5.11 5.59 0.44 1.22 1.66 — 9,341 9,341 0.19 0.44 22.9 9,500 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 14.0 16.1 33.7 0.04 0.55 5.11 5.66 0.51 1.22 1.73 — 8,858 8,858 0.23 0.46 0.65 9,003 2025 13.8 15.0 32.4 0.04 0.48 5.11 5.59 0.44 1.22 1.66 — 8,737 8,737 0.22 0.45 0.59 8,878 2026 13.7 14.1 31.2 0.04 0.42 5.11 5.54 0.39 1.22 1.61 — 8,617 8,617 0.21 0.45 0.53 8,757 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
8 / 41
2024 4.31 8.95 13.9 0.02 0.34 2.93 3.27 0.32 0.99 1.30 — 3,433 3,433 0.09 0.14 3.19 3,481 2025 9.89 10.6 23.5 0.03 0.34 3.63 3.98 0.32 0.86 1.18 — 6,330 6,330 0.14 0.32 7.08 6,437 2026 0.47 0.48 0.81 < 0.005 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.02 0.01 0.03 — 150 150 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 151 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.79 1.63 2.54 < 0.005 0.06 0.53 0.60 0.06 0.18 0.24 — 568 568 0.02 0.02 0.53 576 2025 1.81 1.93 4.28 < 0.005 0.06 0.66 0.73 0.06 0.16 0.22 — 1,048 1,048 0.02 0.05 1.17 1,066 2026 0.09 0.09 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 24.8 24.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 25.0

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 29.2 12.7 140 0.27 0.36 21.6 22.0 0.35 5.49 5.84 248 30,797 31,045 26.3 1.18 73.5 32,127 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 24.8 14.1 93.7 0.24 0.35 21.6 21.9 0.34 5.49 5.83 248 28,510 28,758 26.4 1.28 5.50 29,803 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 26.2 13.5 107 0.25 0.35 21.5 21.8 0.34 5.46 5.80 248 28,990 29,238 26.3 1.23 33.8 30,297 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.79 2.47 19.6 0.05 0.06 3.92 3.98 0.06 1.00 1.06 41.1 4,800 4,841 4.36 0.20 5.60 5,016 Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
9 / 41
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,100
Unmit. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Yes

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 14.3 10.5 109 0.25 0.20 21.6 21.8 0.18 5.49 5.67 — 25,750 25,750 0.93 1.06 69.8 26,160 Area 14.8 0.29 30.5 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 81.5 81.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 81.7 Energy 0.11 1.87 0.80 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 4,914 4,914 0.46 0.03 — 4,936 Water — — — — — — — — — — 33.8 51.6 85.4 3.47 0.08 — 197 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 214 0.00 214 21.4 0.00 — 749
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.69 3.69
Total 29.2 12.7 140 0.27 0.36 21.6 22.0 0.35 5.49 5.84 248 30,797 31,045 26.3 1.18 73.5 32,127 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 12.5 12.3 92.9 0.23 0.20 21.6 21.8 0.18 5.49 5.67 — 23,544 23,544 1.07 1.16 1.81 23,918 Area 12.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.11 1.87 0.80 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 4,914 4,914 0.46 0.03 — 4,936 SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
10 / 41
Water — — — — — — — — — — 33.8 51.6 85.4 3.47 0.08 — 197 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 214 0.00 214 21.4 0.00 — 749
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.69 3.69
Total 24.8 14.1 93.7 0.24 0.35 21.6 21.9 0.34 5.49 5.83 248 28,510 28,758 26.4 1.28 5.50 29,803 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 12.6 11.5 91.4 0.24 0.20 21.5 21.7 0.18 5.46 5.64 — 23,984 23,984 0.99 1.11 30.1 24,371 Area 13.5 0.14 15.1 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 40.2 40.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 40.3 Energy 0.11 1.87 0.80 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 4,914 4,914 0.46 0.03 — 4,936 Water — — — — — — — — — — 33.8 51.6 85.4 3.47 0.08 — 197 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 214 0.00 214 21.4 0.00 — 749
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.69 3.69
Total 26.2 13.5 107 0.25 0.35 21.5 21.8 0.34 5.46 5.80 248 28,990 29,238 26.3 1.23 33.8 30,297 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 2.30 2.10 16.7 0.04 0.04 3.92 3.95 0.03 1.00 1.03 — 3,971 3,971 0.16 0.18 4.99 4,035 Area 2.46 0.03 2.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 6.65 6.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.67 Energy 0.02 0.34 0.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 814 814 0.08 0.01 — 817 Water — — — — — — — — — — 5.60 8.54 14.1 0.57 0.01 — 32.6 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 35.5 0.00 35.5 3.54 0.00 — 124 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.61 0.61
Total 4.79 2.47 19.6 0.05 0.06 3.92 3.98 0.06 1.00 1.06 41.1 4,800 4,841 4.36 0.20 5.60 5,016

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
11 / 41
Onsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60— 1.60 1.47— 1.47— 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04— 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 19.7 19.7— 10.1 10.1———————
Onsite
truck

0.10 0.99 0.90 < 0.005 0.04— 0.04 0.04— 0.04— 145 145 0.01 < 0.005— 146 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 0.54 0.54— 0.28 0.28———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.18 0.16 < 0.005 0.01— 0.01 0.01— 0.01— 24.0 24.0 < 0.005 < 0.005— 24.1 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 0.10 0.10— 0.05 0.05———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Offsite—————————————————
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
12 / 41
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.05 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 199 199 < 0.005 0.01 0.78 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.95 4.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.82 0.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
13 / 41
Dust————— 9.20 9.20— 3.65 3.65———————
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.34 3.29 2.89 0.01 0.14— 0.14 0.13— 0.13— 633 633 0.03 0.01— 635 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 0.88 0.88— 0.35 0.35———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.60 0.53 < 0.005 0.03— 0.03 0.02— 0.02— 105 105 < 0.005 < 0.005— 105 Dust
From
Material
Movement
————— 0.16 0.16— 0.06 0.06———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.08 0.05 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05— 228 228 < 0.005 0.01 0.89— Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
14 / 41
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.8 19.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.28 3.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
15 / 41
Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.36 3.32 3.88 0.01 0.15— 0.15 0.14— 0.14— 708 708 0.03 0.01— 711 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.61 0.71 < 0.005 0.03— 0.03 0.02— 0.02— 117 117 < 0.005 < 0.005— 118 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 1.52 1.00 21.6 0.00 0.00 3.91 3.91 0.00 0.92 0.92— 4,401 4,401 0.06 0.16 17.2— Vendor 0.05 2.29 0.59 0.01 0.02 0.42 0.45 0.02 0.12 0.14— 1,664 1,664 0.01 0.26 4.33— Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 1.21 1.29 15.7 0.00 0.00 3.91 3.91 0.00 0.92 0.92— 3,886 3,886 0.09 0.16 0.45— Vendor 0.05 2.46 0.61 0.01 0.02 0.42 0.45 0.02 0.12 0.14— 1,664 1,664 0.01 0.26 0.11— Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Average
Daily
—————————————————
Worker 0.40 0.34 4.77 0.00 0.00 1.15 1.15 0.00 0.27 0.27— 1,180 1,180 0.02 0.05 2.19— Vendor 0.01 0.71 0.18 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.01 0.03 0.04— 492 492 < 0.005 0.08 0.55— Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— Annual—————————————————
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.05— 195 195 < 0.005 0.01 0.36— SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
16 / 41
Vendor < 0.005 0.13 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 81.4 81.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.09 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.80 7.46 9.31 0.02 0.31 — 0.31 0.28 — 0.28 — 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01 — 1,719 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 1.36 1.70 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
17 / 41
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.34 0.87 20.1 0.00 0.00 3.91 3.91 0.00 0.92 0.92 — 4,312 4,312 0.06 0.15 15.5 — Vendor 0.05 2.17 0.57 0.01 0.02 0.42 0.45 0.02 0.12 0.14 — 1,635 1,635 0.01 0.24 4.30 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.16 1.15 14.7 0.00 0.00 3.91 3.91 0.00 0.92 0.92 — 3,808 3,808 0.09 0.16 0.40 — Vendor 0.05 2.33 0.59 0.01 0.02 0.42 0.45 0.02 0.12 0.14 — 1,636 1,636 0.01 0.24 0.11 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.83 0.72 10.8 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 0.00 0.65 0.65 — 2,795 2,795 0.05 0.11 4.79 — Vendor 0.03 1.63 0.42 0.01 0.02 0.30 0.32 0.02 0.08 0.10 — 1,168 1,168 0.01 0.17 1.33 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.15 0.13 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 463 463 0.01 0.02 0.79 — Vendor 0.01 0.30 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 193 193 < 0.005 0.03 0.22 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
18 / 41
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.10 1.02 13.8 0.00 0.00 3.91 3.91 0.00 0.92 0.92 — 3,734 3,734 0.08 0.16 0.36 — Vendor 0.05 2.21 0.57 0.01 0.02 0.42 0.45 0.02 0.12 0.14 — 1,605 1,605 0.01 0.24 0.10 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.0 15.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 — Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.28 6.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
19 / 41
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.49 2.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.04 1.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.11. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.76 7.12 9.94 0.01 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.39 0.54 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 82.8 82.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 83.1 Paving 0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.07 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.7 13.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.8 Paving 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
20 / 41
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 145 145 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.16 8.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.35 1.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

11.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

11.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 35.8 35.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 35.9 Architectu
ral
Coatings

2.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.04 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.93 5.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.95 Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
22 / 41
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.30 0.20 4.31 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.18 0.18 — 880 880 0.01 0.03 3.44 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.24 0.26 3.14 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.18 0.18 — 777 777 0.02 0.03 0.09 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 214 214 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 35.4 35.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

11.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

11.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.63 0.81 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 95.4 95.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 95.7 Architectu
ral
Coatings

7.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.12 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 Architectu
ral
Coatings

1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
24 / 41
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.27 0.17 4.03 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.18 0.18 — 862 862 0.01 0.03 3.11 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.23 0.23 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.18 0.18 — 762 762 0.02 0.03 0.08 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.17 0.14 2.15 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.13 0.13 — 559 559 0.01 0.02 0.96 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 92.6 92.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

3.17. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
25 / 41
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.86 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings

11.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.22 0.20 2.76 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.18 0.18 — 747 747 0.02 0.03 0.07 — SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
26 / 41
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 24.0 24.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.98 3.98 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

14.3 10.5 109 0.25 0.20 21.6 21.8 0.18 5.48 5.67 — 25,714 25,714 0.93 1.06 69.7 26,123 City Park 0.01 0.01 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 36.6 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 14.3 10.5 109 0.25 0.20 21.6 21.8 0.18 5.49 5.67 — 25,750 25,750 0.93 1.06 69.8 26,160 SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
27 / 41
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

12.5 12.2 92.8 0.23 0.20 21.6 21.8 0.18 5.48 5.67 — 23,511 23,511 1.07 1.16 1.81 23,884 City Park 0.01 0.02 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 32.9 32.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 33.4 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 12.5 12.3 92.9 0.23 0.20 21.6 21.8 0.18 5.49 5.67 — 23,544 23,544 1.07 1.16 1.81 23,918 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

2.30 2.10 16.7 0.04 0.04 3.92 3.95 0.03 1.00 1.03 — 3,968 3,968 0.16 0.18 4.98 4,032 City Park < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.92 2.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.96 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2.30 2.10 16.7 0.04 0.04 3.92 3.95 0.03 1.00 1.03 — 3,971 3,971 0.16 0.18 4.99 4,035

4.2. Energy

0.11 1.87 0.80 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,374 2,374 0.21 < 0.005 — 2,380 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
29 / 41
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.11 1.87 0.80 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,374 2,374 0.21 < 0.005 — 2,380 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.11 1.87 0.80 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,374 2,374 0.21 < 0.005 — 2,380 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.11 1.87 0.80 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,374 2,374 0.21 < 0.005 — 2,380 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.02 0.34 0.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 393 393 0.03 < 0.005 — 394 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.34 0.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 393 393 0.03 < 0.005 — 394

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

2.66 0.29 30.5 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 81.5 81.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 81.7 Total 14.8 0.29 30.5 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 81.5 81.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 81.7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

11.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 12.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

2.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.24 0.03 2.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.65 6.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.67 Total 2.46 0.03 2.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 6.65 6.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.67 SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
31 / 41

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.69 3.69
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.69 3.69
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.69 3.69
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.69 3.69
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.61 0.61
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.61 0.61
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
34 / 41

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/1/2024 6/14/2024 5.00 10.0 — Grading Grading 6/15/2024 8/2/2024 5.00 35.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 8/3/2024 1/2/2026 5.00 370 — Paving Paving 1/3/2026 1/30/2026 5.00 20.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/17/2024 1/16/2026 5.00 370 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
35 / 41
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 387 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 57.4 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
36 / 41
Paving Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 77.3 14.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.80 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
37 / 41
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
City Park 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 7.73 100%

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Mid Rise 1,540 1,540 1,540 562,282 13,382 13,382 13,382 4,884,394 Apartments Mid Rise 832 832 832 303,680 7,227 7,227 7,227 2,637,985 Apartments Mid Rise 1,118 1,118 1,118 408,070 9,712 9,712 9,712 3,544,792 City Park 1.17 2.94 3.29 630 15.2 38.3 42.8 8,204
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
38 / 41

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 71
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 166
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 38
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 90
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 52
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 120
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
39 / 41
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 1,070,721 341 0.0330 0.0040 3,268,821 Apartments Mid Rise 578,280 341 0.0330 0.0040 1,765,439 Apartments Mid Rise 777,063 341 0.0330 0.0040 2,372,309 City Park 0.00 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
40 / 41
Parking Lot 295,004 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 7,789,343 14.1
Apartments Mid Rise 4,206,902 14.1
Apartments Mid Rise 5,653,025 14.1
City Park 0.00 25.6
Parking Lot 0.00 11.5

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 175 —
Apartments Mid Rise 94.6 —
Apartments Mid Rise 127 —
City Park 0.13 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced SVSP (baseline) Custom Report, 8/4/2023
41 / 41
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C & R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0 Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
City Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
City Park Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00

Construction: Construction Phases no demo. adjusted arch coatings to start 2 weeks after start of building construction and last same # of days. no applicant questionnaire for construction.

Operations: Vehicle Data using Roseville trip rates from F&P transportation impact analysis dated 7/25/23.

Appendix C
CalEEMod Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas
Modeling Results
Mitigated Operational ROG
(COMP and SVSP separately)
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 1 / 17
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 2 / 17

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 3 / 17

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 4 / 17

1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 5 / 17
Apartments Mid Rise 285 Dwelling Unit 13.7 273,600 1.00 — 744 CO-52 Parking Lot 456 Space 4.00 0.00 1.00 — — minimum spaces 1.5 plus 1/10 units
guests

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 15.4 6.71 74.2 0.14 0.19 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.91 3.09 132 17,078 17,209 13.9 0.63 39.0 17,783 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 13.1 7.49 49.7 0.13 0.18 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.91 3.09 132 15,865 15,997 14.0 0.68 2.92 16,552 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 13.8 7.18 56.9 0.13 0.19 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.90 3.08 132 16,129 16,260 14.0 0.65 17.9 16,822 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.53 1.31 10.4 0.02 0.03 2.08 2.11 0.03 0.53 0.56 21.8 2,670 2,692 2.31 0.11 2.97 2,785 Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 6 / 17
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 — — — — 82.0 — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. No No — — — — No — — — — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshold — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,100
Unmit. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Yes

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 7.57 5.57 57.6 0.13 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.91 3.01 — 13,647 13,647 0.49 0.56 37.0 13,864 Area 7.80 0.15 16.2 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 43.2 43.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 43.4 Energy 0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 3,345 3,345 0.24 0.02 — 3,356 Water — — — — — — — — — — 17.9 42.5 60.4 1.84 0.04 — 120 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 114 0.00 114 11.4 0.00 — 397
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Total 15.4 6.71 74.2 0.14 0.19 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.91 3.09 132 17,078 17,209 13.9 0.63 39.0 17,783 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 6.65 6.50 49.2 0.12 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.91 3.01 — 12,478 12,478 0.57 0.61 0.96 12,676 Area 6.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 3,345 3,345 0.24 0.02 — 3,356 SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 7 / 17
Water — — — — — — — — — — 17.9 42.5 60.4 1.84 0.04 — 120 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 114 0.00 114 11.4 0.00 — 397
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Total 13.1 7.49 49.7 0.13 0.18 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.91 3.09 132 15,865 15,997 14.0 0.68 2.92 16,552 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 6.70 6.11 48.5 0.12 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.90 2.99 — 12,720 12,720 0.53 0.59 16.0 12,925 Area 7.08 0.08 7.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 21.3 21.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 21.4 Energy 0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 3,345 3,345 0.24 0.02 — 3,356 Water — — — — — — — — — — 17.9 42.5 60.4 1.84 0.04 — 120 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 114 0.00 114 11.4 0.00 — 397
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Total 13.8 7.18 56.9 0.13 0.19 11.4 11.6 0.18 2.90 3.08 132 16,129 16,260 14.0 0.65 17.9 16,822 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.22 1.12 8.85 0.02 0.02 2.08 2.10 0.02 0.53 0.55 — 2,106 2,106 0.09 0.10 2.65 2,140 Area 1.29 0.01 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 3.53 3.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.54 Energy 0.01 0.18 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 554 554 0.04 < 0.005 — 556 Water — — — — — — — — — — 2.97 7.03 10.0 0.31 0.01 — 19.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 18.8 0.00 18.8 1.88 0.00 — 65.8 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
Total 2.53 1.31 10.4 0.02 0.03 2.08 2.11 0.03 0.53 0.56 21.8 2,670 2,692 2.31 0.11 2.97 2,785

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 8 / 17
Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

7.57 5.57 57.6 0.13 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.91 3.01 — 13,647 13,647 0.49 0.56 37.0 13,864 Parking
Lot

6.65 6.50 49.2 0.12 0.10 11.4 11.5 0.10 2.91 3.01 — 12,478 12,478 0.57 0.61 0.96 12,676 Parking
Lot

1.22 1.12 8.85 0.02 0.02 2.08 2.10 0.02 0.53 0.55 — 2,106 2,106 0.09 0.10 2.65 2,140 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.22 1.12 8.85 0.02 0.02 2.08 2.10 0.02 0.53 0.55 — 2,106 2,106 0.09 0.10 2.65 2,140

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 9 / 17
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,864 1,864 0.12 0.01 — 1,871
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 221 221 0.01 < 0.005 — 222
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2,085 2,085 0.13 0.02 — 2,093 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,864 1,864 0.12 0.01 — 1,871
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 221 221 0.01 < 0.005 — 222
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2,085 2,085 0.13 0.02 — 2,093 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 309 309 0.02 < 0.005 — 310
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 36.6 36.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 345 345 0.02 < 0.005 — 347

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 10 / 17
Apartmen 0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,260 1,260 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,263 ts
Parking
Lot

0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,260 1,260 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,263 Parking
Lot

0.01 0.18 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 209 209 0.02 < 0.005 — 209 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.01 0.18 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 209 209 0.02 < 0.005 — 209

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

1.41 0.15 16.2 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 43.2 43.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 43.4 Total 7.80 0.15 16.2 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 43.2 43.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 43.4 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

5.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 6.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.13 0.01 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.53 3.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.54 Total 1.29 0.01 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 3.53 3.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.54 SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 12 / 17

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 13 / 17

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 14 / 17
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.96 1.96
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 86
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 200
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180
SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 16 / 17

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 9,366,931 14.1
Parking Lot 0.00 11.5

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 211 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced SVSP and COMP Amendments (CO-52 Only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 17 / 17
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C & R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0 Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use CO52 only run
Construction: Construction Phases no demo. adjusted arch coatings to start 2 weeks after start of building construction and last same # of days. no applicant questionnaire for construction.

Operations: Vehicle Data using Roseville trip rates from F&P transportation impact analysis dated 7/25/23.

Operations: Consumer Products reduced lb VOC/sf/day from 0.0000214 to 0.0000211 due to CARB consumer products regulation, reducing VOC by 1.2% in 2023 (3 tpd reduction from 260 tpd VOC). https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2021/consumerproducts2021/isor.pdf SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 1 / 33
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 2 / 33

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 3 / 33

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 4 / 33

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 5 / 33

1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 6 / 33
Apartments Mid Rise 355 Dwelling Unit 2.95 340,800 1.00 — 927 WB-30 Apartments Mid Rise 192 Dwelling Unit 2.34 184,320 1.00 — 501 WB-32 Apartments Mid Rise 256 Dwelling Unit 3.35 245,760 1.00 — 668 FD-34 City Park 1.50 Acre 1.50 0.00 1.00 1.00 — park
Parking Lot 1,258 Space 11.3 0.00 1.00 — — minimum spaces 1.5 plus 1/10 units
guests

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Transportation T-4 Integrate Aordable and Below Market Rate Housing

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 42.4 18.1 201 0.38 0.52 30.6 31.1 0.50 7.78 8.28 371 44,026 44,397 39.2 1.68 104 45,983 Mit. 42.4 18.1 201 0.38 0.52 30.6 31.1 0.50 7.78 8.28 371 44,026 44,397 39.2 1.68 104 45,983 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 35.9 20.2 133 0.35 0.50 30.6 31.1 0.49 7.78 8.27 371 40,779 41,150 39.4 1.82 8.09 42,684 Mit. 35.9 20.2 133 0.35 0.50 30.6 31.1 0.49 7.78 8.27 371 40,779 41,150 39.4 1.82 8.09 42,684 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 7 / 33
%
Reduced
—————————————————
Average
Daily
(Max)
—————————————————
Unmit. 37.8 19.1 152 0.35 0.51 30.0 30.5 0.49 7.63 8.12 371 40,998 41,369 39.3 1.73 47.6 42,913 Mit. 37.8 19.1 152 0.35 0.51 30.0 30.5 0.49 7.63 8.12 371 40,998 41,369 39.3 1.73 47.6 42,913 % Reduced
—————————————————
Annual
(Max)
—————————————————
Unmit. 6.89 3.49 27.6 0.06 0.09 5.48 5.57 0.09 1.39 1.48 61.4 6,788 6,849 6.50 0.29 7.89 7,105 Mit. 6.89 3.49 27.6 0.06 0.09 5.48 5.57 0.09 1.39 1.48 61.4 6,788 6,849 6.50 0.29 7.89 7,105 % Reduced
—————————————————
Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
—————————————————
Threshold 55.0 55.0———— 82.0——————————
Unmit. No No———— No——————————
Mit. No No———— No——————————
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
—————————————————
Threshold 55.0 55.0———— 82.0——————————
Unmit. No No———— No——————————
Mit. No No———— No——————————
Exceeds
(Annual)
—————————————————
Threshold———————————————— 1,100
Unmit.———————————————— Yes
Mit.———————————————— Yes
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 8 / 33

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 20.2 14.9 154 0.36 0.28 30.6 30.9 0.26 7.78 8.04 — 36,488 36,488 1.32 1.51 98.9 37,069 Area 22.0 0.43 45.6 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 0.00 122 122 0.01 < 0.005 — 122 Energy 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 7,340 7,340 0.68 0.05 — 7,372 Water — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Total 42.4 18.1 201 0.38 0.52 30.6 31.1 0.50 7.78 8.28 371 44,026 44,397 39.2 1.68 104 45,983 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 17.8 17.4 132 0.33 0.28 30.6 30.9 0.26 7.78 8.04 — 33,362 33,362 1.52 1.64 2.57 33,892 Area 18.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 7,340 7,340 0.68 0.05 — 7,372 Water — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Total 35.9 20.2 133 0.35 0.50 30.6 31.1 0.49 7.78 8.27 371 40,779 41,150 39.4 1.82 8.09 42,684 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 17.6 16.1 128 0.33 0.27 30.0 30.3 0.26 7.63 7.89 — 33,521 33,521 1.39 1.55 42.1 34,061 Area 20.0 0.21 22.5 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 60.1 60.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 60.3 Energy 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 7,340 7,340 0.68 0.05 — 7,372 Water — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 9 / 33
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Total 37.8 19.1 152 0.35 0.51 30.0 30.5 0.49 7.63 8.12 371 40,998 41,369 39.3 1.73 47.6 42,913 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 3.22 2.94 23.3 0.06 0.05 5.48 5.53 0.05 1.39 1.44 — 5,550 5,550 0.23 0.26 6.97 5,639 Area 3.64 0.04 4.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 9.94 9.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.98 Energy 0.03 0.51 0.22 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 1,215 1,215 0.11 0.01 — 1,221 Water — — — — — — — — — — 8.37 12.8 21.1 0.86 0.02 — 48.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 53.0 0.00 53.0 5.30 0.00 — 185 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.91 0.91
Total 6.89 3.49 27.6 0.06 0.09 5.48 5.57 0.09 1.39 1.48 61.4 6,788 6,849 6.50 0.29 7.89 7,105

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 20.2 14.9 154 0.36 0.28 30.6 30.9 0.26 7.78 8.04 — 36,488 36,488 1.32 1.51 98.9 37,069 Area 22.0 0.43 45.6 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 0.00 122 122 0.01 < 0.005 — 122 Energy 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 7,340 7,340 0.68 0.05 — 7,372 Water — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Total 42.4 18.1 201 0.38 0.52 30.6 31.1 0.50 7.78 8.28 371 44,026 44,397 39.2 1.68 104 45,983 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 17.8 17.4 132 0.33 0.28 30.6 30.9 0.26 7.78 8.04 — 33,362 33,362 1.52 1.64 2.57 33,892 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 10 / 33
Area 18.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 7,340 7,340 0.68 0.05 — 7,372 Water — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Total 35.9 20.2 133 0.35 0.50 30.6 31.1 0.49 7.78 8.27 371 40,779 41,150 39.4 1.82 8.09 42,684 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 17.6 16.1 128 0.33 0.27 30.0 30.3 0.26 7.63 7.89 — 33,521 33,521 1.39 1.55 42.1 34,061 Area 20.0 0.21 22.5 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 60.1 60.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 60.3 Energy 0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 7,340 7,340 0.68 0.05 — 7,372 Water — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Total 37.8 19.1 152 0.35 0.51 30.0 30.5 0.49 7.63 8.12 371 40,998 41,369 39.3 1.73 47.6 42,913 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 3.22 2.94 23.3 0.06 0.05 5.48 5.53 0.05 1.39 1.44 — 5,550 5,550 0.23 0.26 6.97 5,639 Area 3.64 0.04 4.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 9.94 9.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.98 Energy 0.03 0.51 0.22 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 1,215 1,215 0.11 0.01 — 1,221 Water — — — — — — — — — — 8.37 12.8 21.1 0.86 0.02 — 48.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 53.0 0.00 53.0 5.30 0.00 — 185 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.91 0.91
Total 6.89 3.49 27.6 0.06 0.09 5.48 5.57 0.09 1.39 1.48 61.4 6,788 6,849 6.50 0.29 7.89 7,105

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 11 / 33

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 3.22 2.94 23.3 0.06 0.05 5.48 5.53 0.05 1.39 1.44 — 5,550 5,550 0.23 0.26 6.97 5,639 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 12 / 33

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

4.2. Energy

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 3,387 3,387 0.33 0.04 — 3,407
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 403 403 0.04 < 0.005 — 406
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3,790 3,790 0.37 0.04 — 3,813 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 3,387 3,387 0.33 0.04 — 3,407
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 403 403 0.04 < 0.005 — 406
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3,790 3,790 0.37 0.04 — 3,813 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 561 561 0.05 0.01 — 564
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 66.8 66.8 0.01 < 0.005 — 67.2
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 15 / 33
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 628 628 0.06 0.01 — 631

0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 3,549 3,549 0.31 0.01 — 3,559 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.03 0.51 0.22 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 588 588 0.05 < 0.005 — 589 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 16 / 33
Total 0.03 0.51 0.22 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 588 588 0.05 < 0.005 — 589

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.16 2.80 1.19 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 3,549 3,549 0.31 0.01 — 3,559 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.03 0.51 0.22 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 588 588 0.05 < 0.005 — 589 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 17 / 33
Total 0.03 0.51 0.22 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 588 588 0.05 < 0.005 — 589

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

16.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

3.97 0.43 45.6 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 122 122 0.01 < 0.005 — 122 Total 22.0 0.43 45.6 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 0.00 122 122 0.01 < 0.005 — 122 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

16.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 18.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 18 / 33
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

2.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.36 0.04 4.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.94 9.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.98 Total 3.64 0.04 4.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 9.94 9.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.98

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

16.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

3.97 0.43 45.6 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 122 122 0.01 < 0.005 — 122 Total 22.0 0.43 45.6 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 0.00 122 122 0.01 < 0.005 — 122 SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 19 / 33
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

16.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 18.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consume
r
Products

2.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 20 / 33
Apartmen
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 8.37 12.8 21.1 0.86 0.02 — 48.8
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — 8.37 12.8 21.1 0.86 0.02 — 48.8

4.4.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 21 / 33
Apartmen — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 ts
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 77.2 128 5.19 0.12 — 295 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 8.37 12.8 21.1 0.86 0.02 — 48.8
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — 8.37 12.8 21.1 0.86 0.02 — 48.8

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 22 / 33
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.00 — 0.24 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.00 — 0.24 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 53.0 0.00 53.0 5.30 0.00 — 185
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 — 0.04 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 53.0 0.00 53.0 5.30 0.00 — 185

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 23 / 33
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.00 — 0.24 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.00 — 0.24 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 320 0.00 320 32.0 0.00 — 1,120 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 53.0 0.00 53.0 5.30 0.00 — 185
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 — 0.04 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 53.0 0.00 53.0 5.30 0.00 — 185

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 24 / 33
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.91 0.91
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.91 0.91

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 25 / 33
Apartmen — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
ts
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.52 5.52
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.91 0.91
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.91 0.91

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Mid Rise 2,307 2,307 2,307 842,237 20,045 20,045 20,045 7,316,287 Apartments Mid Rise 1,248 1,248 1,248 455,520 10,841 10,841 10,841 3,956,978 Apartments Mid Rise 1,393 1,257 1,047 483,218 12,097 10,919 9,095 4,197,585 City Park 1.17 2.94 3.29 630 15.2 38.3 42.8 8,204
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 107
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 249
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 58
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 134
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 77
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 27 / 33
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 179
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0

5.10.1.2. Mitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 107
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 249
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 58
Propane Fireplaces0
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 28 / 33
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 134
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 77
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 179
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 29 / 33
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 1,603,823 341 0.0330 0.0040 4,896,335 Apartments Mid Rise 867,420 341 0.0330 0.0040 2,648,158 Apartments Mid Rise 1,156,560 341 0.0330 0.0040 3,530,878 City Park 0.00 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 432,031 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 1,603,823 341 0.0330 0.0040 4,896,335 Apartments Mid Rise 867,420 341 0.0330 0.0040 2,648,158 Apartments Mid Rise 1,156,560 341 0.0330 0.0040 3,530,878 City Park 0.00 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 432,031 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 30 / 33

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 11,667,581 14.1
Apartments Mid Rise 6,310,354 14.1
Apartments Mid Rise 8,413,805 14.1
City Park 0.00 25.6
Parking Lot 0.00 11.5

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 263 —
Apartments Mid Rise 142 —
Apartments Mid Rise 189 —
City Park 0.13 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 31 / 33

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 263 —
Apartments Mid Rise 142 —
Apartments Mid Rise 189 —
City Park 0.13 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
City Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 32 / 33
City Park Stand-alone retail R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00 refrigerators and
freezers

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
City Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
City Park Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00

SVSP and COMP Amendments (SVSP parcels only) Custom Report, 8/8/2023 33 / 33
Construction: Construction Phases no demo. adjusted arch coatings to start 2 weeks after start of building construction and last same # of days. no applicant questionnaire for construction.

Operations: Vehicle Data using Roseville trip rates from F&P transportation impact analysis dated 7/25/23.

Operations: Consumer Products reduced lb VOC/sf/day from 0.0000214 to 0.0000211 based on CARB consumer products regulation assumption that by 2023 reduction in VOC by 1.2% (260 tpd reduced by 3 tpd) https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2021/consumerproducts2021/isor.pdf Appendix D
CalEEMod Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas
Modeling Results
Entire Specific Plans Operational Emissions
(COMP and SVSP separately)
COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
1 / 23
COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
2 / 23

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
3 / 23

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
4 / 23

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name COMP approved (baseline)
Operational Year 2028
Lead Agency City of Roseville
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.50
Precipitation (days) 7.80
Location 38.79005794450529, -121.3222527472185
County Placer-Sacramento
City Roseville
Air District Placer County APCD
Air Basin Sacramento Valley
TAZ 428
EDFZ 15
Electric Utility Roseville Electric
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.16

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 88.9 70.8 741 1.76 1.35 151 152 1.27 38.3 39.6 — 179,011 179,011 6.09 7.20 487 181,796 Area 213 5.80 346 0.54 37.0 — 37.0 36.5 — 36.5 4,130 2,693 6,823 12.4 0.20 — 7,194 Energy 0.38 6.64 4.11 0.04 0.52 — 0.52 0.52 — 0.52 — 20,958 20,958 1.96 0.17 — 21,056 Water — — — — — — — — — — 376 632 1,009 38.7 0.92 — 2,251 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 507 0.00 507 50.6 0.00 — 1,772 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 17.6 17.6
Total 302 83.3 1,091 2.34 38.9 151 189 38.3 38.3 76.5 5,013 203,294 208,307 110 8.49 505 214,087 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 78.4 82.8 622 1.61 1.35 151 152 1.27 38.3 39.6 — 163,612 163,612 6.93 7.84 12.6 166,133 Area 204 5.10 269 0.53 36.9 — 36.9 36.4 — 36.4 4,130 2,453 6,583 12.4 0.20 — 6,953 Energy 0.38 6.64 4.11 0.04 0.52 — 0.52 0.52 — 0.52 — 20,958 20,958 1.96 0.17 — 21,056 Water — — — — — — — — — — 376 632 1,009 38.7 0.92 — 2,251 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 507 0.00 507 50.6 0.00 — 1,772 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 17.6 17.6
Total 283 94.5 895 2.18 38.8 151 189 38.2 38.3 76.5 5,013 187,655 192,668 111 9.13 30.2 198,182 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 70.9 70.1 556 1.48 1.22 135 136 1.14 34.3 35.5 — 150,323 150,323 5.82 6.78 190 152,680 Area 78.5 1.49 98.5 0.12 8.33 — 8.33 8.20 — 8.20 928 670 1,597 2.79 0.05 — 1,681 Energy 0.38 6.64 4.11 0.04 0.52 — 0.52 0.52 — 0.52 — 20,958 20,958 1.96 0.17 — 21,056 Water — — — — — — — — — — 376 632 1,009 38.7 0.92 — 2,251 COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
7 / 23
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 507 0.00 507 50.6 0.00 — 1,772 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 17.6 17.6
Total 150 78.3 658 1.64 10.1 135 145 9.87 34.3 44.2 1,811 172,582 174,393 99.9 7.92 207 179,457 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 12.9 12.8 101 0.27 0.22 24.6 24.9 0.21 6.27 6.48 — 24,888 24,888 0.96 1.12 31.4 25,278 Area 14.3 0.27 18.0 0.02 1.52 — 1.52 1.50 — 1.50 154 111 264 0.46 0.01 — 278 Energy 0.07 1.21 0.75 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 3,470 3,470 0.32 0.03 — 3,486 Water — — — — — — — — — — 62.3 105 167 6.40 0.15 — 373
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 83.9 0.00 83.9 8.38 0.00 — 293 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.91 2.91
Total 27.3 14.3 120 0.30 1.84 24.6 26.5 1.80 6.27 8.07 300 28,573 28,873 16.5 1.31 34.3 29,711

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

9.92 8.81 93.3 0.23 0.17 19.5 19.7 0.16 4.96 5.12 — 23,101 23,101 0.73 0.90 63.1 23,450 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

11.6 10.3 109 0.27 0.20 22.8 23.0 0.19 5.79 5.98 — 26,986 26,986 0.86 1.05 73.7 27,394 COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
8 / 23
Apartmen 9.61 8.54 90.5 0.22 0.17 18.9 19.1 0.16 4.81 4.96— 22,388 22,388 0.71 0.87 61.1 22,727 ts
Mid Rise
Research &
Development

13.9 10.4 108 0.25 0.19 21.5 21.7 0.18 5.47 5.65— 25,634 25,634 0.91 1.05 69.6 26,040 Strip Mall 43.8 32.7 339 0.79 0.61 67.7 68.3 0.58 17.2 17.8— 80,717 80,717 2.88 3.32 219 81,996 City Park 0.10 0.07 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 0.16 < 0.005 0.04 0.04— 185 185 0.01 0.01 0.50 188 Total 88.9 70.8 741 1.76 1.35 151 152 1.27 38.3 39.6— 179,011 179,011 6.09 7.20 487 181,796 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing

8.82 10.3 76.7 0.21 0.17 19.5 19.7 0.16 4.96 5.12— 21,104 21,104 0.82 0.98 1.64 21,418 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

10.3 12.0 89.6 0.24 0.20 22.8 23.0 0.19 5.79 5.98— 24,653 24,653 0.96 1.14 1.91 25,020 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

8.55 10.00 74.4 0.20 0.17 18.9 19.1 0.16 4.81 4.96— 20,453 20,453 0.79 0.95 1.59 20,757 Research &
Development

12.2 12.1 91.7 0.23 0.19 21.5 21.7 0.18 5.47 5.65— 23,436 23,436 1.05 1.15 1.80 23,806 Strip Mall 38.5 38.2 289 0.72 0.61 67.7 68.3 0.58 17.2 17.8— 73,797 73,797 3.31 3.61 5.68 74,961 City Park 0.09 0.09 0.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 0.16 < 0.005 0.04 0.04— 169 169 0.01 0.01 0.01 172 Total 78.4 82.8 622 1.61 1.35 151 152 1.27 38.3 39.6— 163,612 163,612 6.93 7.84 12.6 166,133 Annual—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing

1.58 1.73 13.7 0.04 0.03 3.46 3.49 0.03 0.88 0.91— 3,483 3,483 0.12 0.15 4.41 3,536 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

1.69 1.85 14.7 0.04 0.03 3.71 3.74 0.03 0.94 0.97— 3,726 3,726 0.13 0.16 4.72 3,783 COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
9 / 23
Apartmen
Mid Rise

1.49 1.63 12.9 0.04 0.03 3.26 3.29 0.03 0.83 0.86 — 3,282 3,282 0.12 0.14 4.15 3,332 Research
&
Development

1.69 1.57 12.4 0.03 0.03 2.94 2.97 0.03 0.75 0.77 — 2,976 2,976 0.12 0.14 3.74 3,024 Strip Mall 6.47 6.00 47.6 0.12 0.10 11.3 11.4 0.10 2.86 2.96 — 11,404 11,404 0.47 0.53 14.3 11,587 City Park 0.01 0.01 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.0 15.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 15.2 Total 12.9 12.8 101 0.27 0.22 24.6 24.9 0.21 6.27 6.48 — 24,888 24,888 0.96 1.12 31.4 25,278

4.2. Energy

0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,262 1,262 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,266 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.07 1.27 0.54 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,609 1,609 0.14 < 0.005 — 1,613 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.08 1.29 0.55 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,634 1,634 0.14 < 0.005 — 1,638 Research
&
Development

0.14 2.55 2.14 0.02 0.19 — 0.19 0.19 — 0.19 — 3,046 3,046 0.27 0.01 — 3,054 Strip Mall 0.03 0.54 0.45 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 645 645 0.06 < 0.005 — 646 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.38 6.64 4.11 0.04 0.52 — 0.52 0.52 — 0.52 — 8,195 8,195 0.73 0.02 — 8,218 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,262 1,262 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,266 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.07 1.27 0.54 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,609 1,609 0.14 < 0.005 — 1,613 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.08 1.29 0.55 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,634 1,634 0.14 < 0.005 — 1,638 COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
12 / 23
Research 0.14 2.55 2.14 0.02 0.19 — 0.19 0.19 — 0.19 — 3,046 3,046 0.27 0.01 — 3,054 &
Development
Strip Mall 0.03 0.54 0.45 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 645 645 0.06 < 0.005 — 646 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.38 6.64 4.11 0.04 0.52 — 0.52 0.52 — 0.52 — 8,195 8,195 0.73 0.02 — 8,218 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.01 0.18 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 209 209 0.02 < 0.005 — 210 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.01 0.23 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 266 266 0.02 < 0.005 — 267 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.01 0.23 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 270 270 0.02 < 0.005 — 271 Research
&
Development

0.03 0.47 0.39 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 504 504 0.04 < 0.005 — 506 Strip Mall 0.01 0.10 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 107 107 0.01 < 0.005 — 107 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.07 1.21 0.75 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,357 1,357 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,361

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 168 5.10 269 0.53 36.9 — 36.9 36.4 — 36.4 4,130 2,453 6,583 12.4 0.20 — 6,953 COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
13 / 23
Consume
Products

36.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

8.55 0.71 77.4 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.05 — 0.05 — 240 240 0.01 < 0.005 — 241 Total 213 5.80 346 0.54 37.0 — 37.0 36.5 — 36.5 4,130 2,693 6,823 12.4 0.20 — 7,194 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 168 5.10 269 0.53 36.9 — 36.9 36.4 — 36.4 4,130 2,453 6,583 12.4 0.20 — 6,953 Consume
r
Products

36.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 204 5.10 269 0.53 36.9 — 36.9 36.4 — 36.4 4,130 2,453 6,583 12.4 0.20 — 6,953 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 6.87 0.21 11.0 0.02 1.51 — 1.51 1.49 — 1.49 154 91.2 245 0.46 0.01 — 259 Consume
r
Products

6.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.77 0.06 6.96 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 19.6 19.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.7 Total 14.3 0.27 18.0 0.02 1.52 — 1.52 1.50 — 1.50 154 111 264 0.46 0.01 — 278

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
14 / 23
Daily,—————————————————
Summer
(Max)
Single
Family
Housing
—————————— 14.7 80.2 94.8 1.51 0.04— 144
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 20.1 30.7 50.7 2.06 0.05— 117
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 24.9 38.1 63.0 2.56 0.06— 145
Research &
Development —
————————— 283 431 714 29.0 0.69— 1,646
Strip Mall—————————— 34.1 52.0 86.0 3.50 0.08— 198
City Park—————————— 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005— < 0.005 Total—————————— 376 632 1,009 38.7 0.92— 2,251
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
—————————— 14.7 80.2 94.8 1.51 0.04— 144
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 20.1 30.7 50.7 2.06 0.05— 117
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 24.9 38.1 63.0 2.56 0.06— 145
Research &
Development —
————————— 283 431 714 29.0 0.69— 1,646
Strip Mall—————————— 34.1 52.0 86.0 3.50 0.08— 198
City Park—————————— 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005— < 0.005 COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
15 / 23
Total — — — — — — — — — — 376 632 1,009 38.7 0.92 — 2,251 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — 2.43 13.3 15.7 0.25 0.01 — 23.8
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 3.33 5.08 8.40 0.34 0.01 — 19.4
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 4.13 6.30 10.4 0.42 0.01 — 24.0
Research
&
Development
— — — — — — — — — — 46.8 71.4 118 4.81 0.11 — 273
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 5.64 8.61 14.2 0.58 0.01 — 32.8 City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — 62.3 105 167 6.40 0.15 — 373

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.25 3.25
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.42 2.42
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.72 2.72
Research
&
Development
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7.67 7.67
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.49 1.49
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 17.6 17.6
COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
18 / 23
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————————— 3.25 3.25
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 2.42 2.42
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 2.72 2.72
Research &
Development —
—————————————— 7.67 7.67
Strip Mall——————————————— 1.49 1.49
City Park——————————————— 0.00 0.00
Total——————————————— 17.6 17.6
Annual—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————————— 0.54 0.54
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 0.40 0.40
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 0.45 0.45
Research &
Development —
—————————————— 1.27 1.27
Strip Mall——————————————— 0.25 0.25
City Park——————————————— 0.00 0.00
Total——————————————— 2.91 2.91
COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
19 / 23

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Single Family
Housing
2,200 2,223 1,992 793,227 27,141 27,429 24,582 9,788,051 Apartments Low
Rise
2,335 2,597 2,003 848,645 28,814 32,042 24,720 10,471,884 Apartments Mid Rise 2,154 1,944 1,620 747,478 26,582 23,993 19,986 9,223,536 Research &
Development
3,378 570 333 927,778 30,248 5,104 2,982 8,307,725
Strip Mall 10,637 10,090 4,903 3,554,933 95,247 90,347 43,905 31,832,412 City Park 8.67 21.8 24.4 4,668 77.7 195 218 41,796

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Single Family Housing —
Wood Fireplaces 35
Gas Fireplaces 117
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 82
COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
20 / 23
Conventional Wood Stoves 12
Catalytic Wood Stoves 12
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 12
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Low Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 96
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 223
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Mid Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 119
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 277
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
21 / 23
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated Parking Area Coated (sq ft) (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
— — — — —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 7,657,877 38,376,406
Apartments Low Rise 10,484,390 14.1
COMP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
22 / 23
Apartments Mid Rise 13,015,104 14.1
Research & Development 147,508,184 11.5
Strip Mall 17,777,405 11.5
City Park 0.00 25.6

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 135 —
Apartments Low Rise 236 —
Apartments Mid Rise 293 —
Research & Development 22.8 —
Strip Mall 252 —
City Park 0.96 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Acres, SF and du from Table 5-1 CO Master Plan (last amended May 2020) COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
1 / 23
COMP with amendments Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
2 / 23

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
3 / 23

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
4 / 23

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name COMP with amendments
Operational Year 2028
Lead Agency City of Roseville
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.50
Precipitation (days) 7.80
Location 38.79005794450529, -121.3222527472185
County Placer-Sacramento
City Roseville
Air District Placer County APCD
Air Basin Sacramento Valley
TAZ 428
EDFZ 15
Electric Utility Roseville Electric
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.16

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Single Family
Housing
233 Dwelling Unit 42.6 454,350 2,729,096 — 608 —
COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
5 / 23
Apartments Low
Rise
319 Dwelling Unit 36.0 338,140 1.00 — 833 —
Apartments Mid Rise 681 Dwelling Unit 35.5 653,760 1.00 — 1,777 — Research &
Development
150 1000sqft 15.2 150,000 1.00 — — —
Strip Mall 240 1000sqft 29.7 240,000 1.00 — — —
City Park 11.1 Acre 11.1 0.00 1.00 1.00 — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 89.2 72.2 757 1.80 1.38 154 156 1.30 39.3 40.6 — 183,506 183,506 6.18 7.35 499 186,350 Area 216 5.90 356 0.54 37.0 — 37.0 36.5 — 36.5 4,130 2,710 6,840 12.4 0.20 — 7,211 Energy 0.36 6.29 3.43 0.04 0.50 — 0.50 0.50 — 0.50 — 19,038 19,038 1.78 0.15 — 19,126 Water — — — — — — — — — — 253 444 697 26.0 0.62 — 1,532 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 614 0.00 614 61.4 0.00 — 2,148 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 15.7 15.7
Total 305 84.4 1,116 2.38 38.9 154 193 38.3 39.3 77.5 4,997 205,698 210,695 108 8.32 515 216,382 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 78.9 84.4 633 1.65 1.38 154 156 1.30 39.3 40.6 — 167,709 167,709 7.02 7.99 13.0 170,279 Area 207 5.10 269 0.53 36.9 — 36.9 36.4 — 36.4 4,130 2,453 6,583 12.4 0.20 — 6,953 Energy 0.36 6.29 3.43 0.04 0.50 — 0.50 0.50 — 0.50 — 19,038 19,038 1.78 0.15 — 19,126 Water — — — — — — — — — — 253 444 697 26.0 0.62 — 1,532 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 614 0.00 614 61.4 0.00 — 2,148 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 15.7 15.7
Total 286 95.8 905 2.22 38.8 154 193 38.2 39.3 77.5 4,997 189,644 194,641 109 8.96 28.6 200,054 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 75.9 76.2 603 1.61 1.33 148 149 1.25 37.5 38.8 — 164,076 164,076 6.28 7.37 207 166,637 Area 81.3 1.54 103 0.12 8.33 — 8.33 8.20 — 8.20 928 678 1,606 2.79 0.05 — 1,689 Energy 0.36 6.29 3.43 0.04 0.50 — 0.50 0.50 — 0.50 — 19,038 19,038 1.78 0.15 — 19,126 Water — — — — — — — — — — 253 444 697 26.0 0.62 — 1,532 COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
7 / 23
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 614 0.00 614 61.4 0.00 — 2,148 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 15.7 15.7
Total 158 84.0 710 1.77 10.2 148 158 9.95 37.5 47.5 1,795 184,236 186,031 98.2 8.18 223 191,147 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 13.8 13.9 110 0.29 0.24 26.9 27.2 0.23 6.85 7.07 — 27,165 27,165 1.04 1.22 34.3 27,589 Area 14.8 0.28 18.8 0.02 1.52 — 1.52 1.50 — 1.50 154 112 266 0.46 0.01 — 280 Energy 0.07 1.15 0.63 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 3,152 3,152 0.29 0.02 — 3,167 Water — — — — — — — — — — 41.9 73.5 115 4.30 0.10 — 254 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 102 0.00 102 10.2 0.00 — 356
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.60 2.60
Total 28.7 15.3 130 0.32 1.85 26.9 28.8 1.82 6.85 8.66 297 30,502 30,800 16.3 1.35 36.9 31,647

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

9.92 8.81 93.3 0.23 0.17 19.5 19.7 0.16 4.96 5.12 — 23,101 23,101 0.73 0.90 63.1 23,450 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

9.25 8.22 87.1 0.21 0.16 18.2 18.4 0.15 4.63 4.78 — 21,549 21,549 0.68 0.84 58.8 21,875 COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
8 / 23
Apartmen 19.7 17.6 186 0.45 0.34 38.8 39.2 0.32 9.88 10.2— 46,003 46,003 1.46 1.79 126 46,699 ts
Mid Rise
Research &
Development

6.48 4.84 50.2 0.12 0.09 10.0 10.1 0.09 2.55 2.64— 11,952 11,952 0.43 0.49 32.4 12,141 Strip Mall 43.8 32.7 339 0.79 0.61 67.7 68.3 0.58 17.2 17.8— 80,717 80,717 2.88 3.32 219 81,996 City Park 0.10 0.07 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 0.16 < 0.005 0.04 0.04— 185 185 0.01 0.01 0.50 188 Total 89.2 72.2 757 1.80 1.38 154 156 1.30 39.3 40.6— 183,506 183,506 6.18 7.35 499 186,350 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing

8.82 10.3 76.7 0.21 0.17 19.5 19.7 0.16 4.96 5.12— 21,104 21,104 0.82 0.98 1.64 21,418 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

8.23 9.62 71.6 0.19 0.16 18.2 18.4 0.15 4.63 4.78— 19,686 19,686 0.76 0.91 1.53 19,979 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

17.6 20.5 153 0.41 0.34 38.8 39.2 0.32 9.88 10.2— 42,026 42,026 1.63 1.95 3.26 42,651 Research &
Development

5.69 5.66 42.8 0.11 0.09 10.0 10.1 0.09 2.55 2.64— 10,927 10,927 0.49 0.53 0.84 11,100 Strip Mall 38.5 38.2 289 0.72 0.61 67.7 68.3 0.58 17.2 17.8— 73,797 73,797 3.31 3.61 5.68 74,961 City Park 0.09 0.09 0.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 0.16 < 0.005 0.04 0.04— 169 169 0.01 0.01 0.01 172 Total 78.9 84.4 633 1.65 1.38 154 156 1.30 39.3 40.6— 167,709 167,709 7.02 7.99 13.0 170,279 Annual—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing

1.58 1.73 13.7 0.04 0.03 3.46 3.49 0.03 0.88 0.91— 3,483 3,483 0.12 0.15 4.41 3,536 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

1.51 1.65 13.1 0.04 0.03 3.30 3.33 0.03 0.84 0.87— 3,323 3,323 0.12 0.15 4.21 3,374 COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
9 / 23
Apartmen
Mid Rise

3.22 3.53 27.9 0.08 0.06 7.05 7.12 0.06 1.79 1.85 — 7,095 7,095 0.25 0.31 8.98 7,203 Research
&
Development

1.05 0.97 7.70 0.02 0.02 1.82 1.84 0.02 0.46 0.48 — 1,844 1,844 0.08 0.09 2.32 1,874 Strip Mall 6.47 6.00 47.6 0.12 0.10 11.3 11.4 0.10 2.86 2.96 — 11,404 11,404 0.47 0.53 14.3 11,587 City Park 0.01 0.01 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.0 15.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 15.2 Total 13.8 13.9 110 0.29 0.24 26.9 27.2 0.23 6.85 7.07 — 27,165 27,165 1.04 1.22 34.3 27,589

4.2. Energy

0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,262 1,262 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,266 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.07 1.27 0.54 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,609 1,609 0.14 < 0.005 — 1,613 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.13 2.21 0.94 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,809 2,809 0.25 0.01 — 2,817 Research
&
Development

0.07 1.28 1.07 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,523 1,523 0.13 < 0.005 — 1,527 Strip Mall 0.03 0.54 0.45 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 645 645 0.06 < 0.005 — 646 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.36 6.29 3.43 0.04 0.50 — 0.50 0.50 — 0.50 — 7,848 7,848 0.69 0.01 — 7,870 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.06 0.99 0.42 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,262 1,262 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,266 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.07 1.27 0.54 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,609 1,609 0.14 < 0.005 — 1,613 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.13 2.21 0.94 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,809 2,809 0.25 0.01 — 2,817 COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
12 / 23
Research 0.07 1.28 1.07 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,523 1,523 0.13 < 0.005 — 1,527 &
Development
Strip Mall 0.03 0.54 0.45 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 645 645 0.06 < 0.005 — 646 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.36 6.29 3.43 0.04 0.50 — 0.50 0.50 — 0.50 — 7,848 7,848 0.69 0.01 — 7,870 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.01 0.18 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 209 209 0.02 < 0.005 — 210 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.01 0.23 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 266 266 0.02 < 0.005 — 267 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.02 0.40 0.17 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 465 465 0.04 < 0.005 — 466 Research
&
Development

0.01 0.23 0.20 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 252 252 0.02 < 0.005 — 253 Strip Mall 0.01 0.10 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 107 107 0.01 < 0.005 — 107 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.07 1.15 0.63 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,299 1,299 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,303

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 168 5.10 269 0.53 36.9 — 36.9 36.4 — 36.4 4,130 2,453 6,583 12.4 0.20 — 6,953 COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
13 / 23
Consume
Products

39.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

8.88 0.81 87.0 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 257 257 0.01 < 0.005 — 258 Total 216 5.90 356 0.54 37.0 — 37.0 36.5 — 36.5 4,130 2,710 6,840 12.4 0.20 — 7,211 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 168 5.10 269 0.53 36.9 — 36.9 36.4 — 36.4 4,130 2,453 6,583 12.4 0.20 — 6,953 Consume
r
Products

39.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 207 5.10 269 0.53 36.9 — 36.9 36.4 — 36.4 4,130 2,453 6,583 12.4 0.20 — 6,953 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 6.87 0.21 11.0 0.02 1.51 — 1.51 1.49 — 1.49 154 91.2 245 0.46 0.01 — 259 Consume
r
Products

7.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.80 0.07 7.83 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 21.0 21.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 21.0 Total 14.8 0.28 18.8 0.02 1.52 — 1.52 1.50 — 1.50 154 112 266 0.46 0.01 — 280

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
14 / 23
Daily,—————————————————
Summer
(Max)
Single
Family
Housing
—————————— 14.7 80.2 94.8 1.51 0.04— 144
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 20.1 30.7 50.7 2.06 0.05— 117
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 42.9 65.4 108 4.40 0.11— 250
Research &
Development —
————————— 141 216 357 14.5 0.35— 823
Strip Mall—————————— 34.1 52.0 86.0 3.50 0.08— 198
City Park—————————— 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005— < 0.005 Total—————————— 253 444 697 26.0 0.62— 1,532
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
—————————— 14.7 80.2 94.8 1.51 0.04— 144
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 20.1 30.7 50.7 2.06 0.05— 117
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 42.9 65.4 108 4.40 0.11— 250
Research &
Development —
————————— 141 216 357 14.5 0.35— 823
Strip Mall—————————— 34.1 52.0 86.0 3.50 0.08— 198
City Park—————————— 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005— < 0.005 COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
15 / 23
Total — — — — — — — — — — 253 444 697 26.0 0.62 — 1,532 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — 2.43 13.3 15.7 0.25 0.01 — 23.8
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 3.33 5.08 8.40 0.34 0.01 — 19.4
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 7.10 10.8 17.9 0.73 0.02 — 41.4
Research
&
Development
— — — — — — — — — — 23.4 35.7 59.1 2.40 0.06 — 136
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 5.64 8.61 14.2 0.58 0.01 — 32.8 City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — 41.9 73.5 115 4.30 0.10 — 254

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.25 3.25
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.42 2.42
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.68 4.68
Research
&
Development
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.83 3.83
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.49 1.49
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 15.7 15.7
COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
18 / 23
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————————— 3.25 3.25
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 2.42 2.42
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 4.68 4.68
Research &
Development —
—————————————— 3.83 3.83
Strip Mall——————————————— 1.49 1.49
City Park——————————————— 0.00 0.00
Total——————————————— 15.7 15.7
Annual—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————————— 0.54 0.54
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 0.40 0.40
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 0.78 0.78
Research &
Development —
—————————————— 0.63 0.63
Strip Mall——————————————— 0.25 0.25
City Park——————————————— 0.00 0.00
Total——————————————— 2.60 2.60
COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
19 / 23

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Single Family
Housing
2,200 2,223 1,992 793,227 27,141 27,429 24,582 9,788,051 Apartments Low
Rise
2,074 2,074 2,074 756,828 25,586 25,586 25,586 9,338,900 Apartments Mid Rise 4,427 4,427 4,427 1,615,673 54,621 54,621 54,621 19,936,650 Research &
Development
1,575 1,575 1,575 574,875 14,103 14,103 14,103 5,147,680 Strip Mall 10,637 10,090 4,903 3,554,933 95,247 90,347 43,905 31,832,412 City Park 8.67 21.8 24.4 4,668 77.7 195 218 41,796

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Single Family Housing —
Wood Fireplaces 35
Gas Fireplaces 117
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 82
COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
20 / 23
Conventional Wood Stoves 12
Catalytic Wood Stoves 12
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 12
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Low Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 96
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 223
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Mid Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 204
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 477
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
21 / 23
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated Parking Area Coated (sq ft) (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
— — — — —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 7,657,877 38,376,406
Apartments Low Rise 10,484,390 14.1
COMP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
22 / 23
Apartments Mid Rise 22,382,035 14.1
Research & Development 73,754,092 11.5
Strip Mall 17,777,405 11.5
City Park 0.00 25.6

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 135 —
Apartments Low Rise 236 —
Apartments Mid Rise 503 —
Research & Development 11.4 —
Strip Mall 252 —
City Park 0.96 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Acres, SF and du from Table 5-1 CO Master Plan (last amended May 2020). Amendments reduce R&D by 150 ksf and include 285 medium density residences. Reduced R&D by 17.65 acres.

Increased HDR du by 17.65 acres.

Operations: Vehicle Data Using F&P transportation analysis for trip generation rates on MFdu and R&D uses.

SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
1 / 32
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
2 / 32

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
3 / 32

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
4 / 32

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name SVSP approved (baseline)
Operational Year 2028
Lead Agency City of Roseville
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.50
Precipitation (days) 7.80
Location 38.764551917638784, -121.37971553454238
County Placer-Sacramento
City Roseville
Air District Placer County APCD
Air Basin Sacramento Valley
TAZ 432
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Roseville Electric
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.16

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Single Family
Housing
3,212 Dwelling Unit 596 6,263,400 37,621,697 — 8,383 —
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
5 / 32
Retirement
Community
493 Dwelling Unit 94.3 522,580 1.00 — 1,287 —
Apartments Low
Rise
2,451 Dwelling Unit 351 2,598,060 1.00 — 6,397 —
Apartments Mid Rise 2,576 Dwelling Unit 92.0 2,472,960 1.00 — 6,723 — Strip Mall 3,100 1000sqft 71.2 3,100,000 1.00 — — —
General Office
Building
716 1000sqft 16.4 716,000 1.00 — — —
City Park 105 Acre 105 0.00 1.00 1.00 — —
Elementary School 1,568 1000sqft 36.0 1,568,160 1.00 1.00 — — Junior High School 523 1000sqft 12.0 522,720 1.00 1.00 — — Place of Worship 183 1000sqft 4.20 182,950 1.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1,478 1,871 20,444 52.6 39.3 4,559 4,598 37.0 1,159 1,196 — 5,354,000 5,354,000 141 193 14,742 5,429,914 Area 2,815 77.2 4,464 7.37 510 — 510 502 — 502 56,932 36,229 93,162 171 2.80 — 98,271 Energy 4.71 82.9 51.5 0.51 6.51 — 6.51 6.51 — 6.51 — 200,814 200,814 18.6 1.35 — 201,681 Water — — — — — — — — — — 1,353 2,860 4,213 139 3.33 — 8,679 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 7,786 0.00 7,786 778 0.00 — 27,242 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 118 118
Total 4,297 2,031 24,960 60.5 556 4,559 5,115 546 1,159 1,705 66,071 5,593,904 5,659,976 1,248 201 14,860 5,765,905 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1,356 2,194 15,914 48.0 39.3 4,559 4,598 37.1 1,159 1,196 — 4,885,936 4,885,936 150 210 382 4,952,625 Area 2,728 70.3 3,703 7.34 509 — 509 502 — 502 56,932 33,816 90,748 171 2.78 — 95,849 Energy 4.71 82.9 51.5 0.51 6.51 — 6.51 6.51 — 6.51 — 200,814 200,814 18.6 1.35 — 201,681 Water — — — — — — — — — — 1,353 2,860 4,213 139 3.33 — 8,679 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 7,786 0.00 7,786 778 0.00 — 27,242 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 118 118
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
7 / 32
Total 4,089 2,348 19,669 55.8 555 4,559 5,114 545 1,159 1,705 66,071 5,123,427 5,189,498 1,256 217 500 5,286,195 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1,183 1,803 14,199 42.6 34.2 3,948 3,982 32.2 1,004 1,036 — 4,337,251 4,337,251 126 176 5,540 4,398,529 Area 981 19.2 1,207 1.67 115 — 115 113 — 113 12,790 8,787 21,578 38.5 0.63 — 22,728 Energy 4.71 82.9 51.5 0.51 6.51 — 6.51 6.51 — 6.51 — 200,814 200,814 18.6 1.35 — 201,681 Water — — — — — — — — — — 1,353 2,860 4,213 139 3.33 — 8,679 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 7,786 0.00 7,786 778 0.00 — 27,242 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 118 118
Total 2,168 1,905 15,458 44.8 155 3,948 4,103 152 1,004 1,156 21,929 4,549,713 4,571,643 1,100 182 5,657 4,658,977 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 216 329 2,591 7.77 6.25 720 727 5.88 183 189 — 718,081 718,081 20.8 29.2 917 728,227 Area 179 3.50 220 0.30 20.9 — 20.9 20.6 — 20.6 2,118 1,455 3,572 6.37 0.10 — 3,763 Energy 0.86 15.1 9.39 0.09 1.19 — 1.19 1.19 — 1.19 — 33,247 33,247 3.08 0.22 — 33,391 Water — — — — — — — — — — 224 474 697 23.0 0.55 — 1,437 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 1,289 0.00 1,289 129 0.00 — 4,510 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 19.5 19.5
Total 396 348 2,821 8.17 28.4 720 749 27.7 183 211 3,631 753,257 756,888 182 30.1 937 771,347

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
8 / 32
Single
Family
Housing
160 180 1,950 4.94 3.71 427 431 3.49 109 112— 502,755 502,755 14.0 18.6 1,381 510,014 Retireme
nt
Communi
ty

6.16 6.95 75.3 0.19 0.14 16.5 16.6 0.13 4.19 4.33— 19,413 19,413 0.54 0.72 53.3 19,693 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
104 117 1,270 3.21 2.42 278 281 2.28 70.7 73.0— 327,341 327,341 9.10 12.1 899 332,067 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

73.0 82.3 892 2.26 1.70 195 197 1.60 49.7 51.3— 229,920 229,920 6.39 8.48 632 233,240 Strip Mall 817 1,069 11,707 30.2 22.6 2,622 2,645 21.3 667 688— 3,077,991 3,077,991 80.1 111 8,480 3,121,433 General
Office
Building

41.5 54.3 594 1.53 1.15 133 134 1.08 33.8 34.9— 156,235 156,235 4.06 5.61 430 158,440 City Park 1.36 1.78 19.5 0.05 0.04 4.37 4.41 0.04 1.11 1.15— 5,132 5,132 0.13 0.18 14.1 5,204 Elementa
ry
School
182 238 2,608 6.74 5.03 584 589 4.74 149 153— 685,766 685,766 17.8 24.6 1,889 695,445 Junior
High
School

62.7 82.0 898 2.32 1.73 201 203 1.63 51.2 52.8— 236,201 236,201 6.14 8.49 651 239,534 Place of
Worship

30.1 39.3 431 1.11 0.83 96.5 97.3 0.78 24.5 25.3— 113,245 113,245 2.95 4.07 312 114,843 Total 1,478 1,871 20,444 52.6 39.3 4,559 4,598 37.0 1,159 1,196— 5,354,000 5,354,000 141 193 14,742 5,429,914 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
145 211 1,542 4.50 3.71 427 431 3.50 109 112— 458,935 458,935 15.1 20.1 35.8 465,351 SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
9 / 32
Retireme 5.59 8.15 59.5 0.17 0.14 16.5 16.6 0.13 4.19 4.33 — 17,721 17,721 0.58 0.78 1.38 17,969 nt
Communi
ty
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

94.2 137 1,004 2.93 2.42 278 281 2.28 70.7 73.0 — 298,810 298,810 9.80 13.1 23.3 302,987 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

66.2 96.5 705 2.06 1.70 195 197 1.60 49.7 51.3 — 209,880 209,880 6.89 9.21 16.4 212,814 Strip Mall 752 1,254 9,076 27.6 22.6 2,622 2,645 21.3 667 688 — 2,808,700 2,808,700 84.4 120 220 2,846,802 General
Office
Building

38.2 63.6 461 1.40 1.15 133 134 1.08 33.8 34.9 — 142,566 142,566 4.28 6.09 11.2 144,500 City Park 1.25 2.09 15.1 0.05 0.04 4.37 4.41 0.04 1.11 1.15 — 4,683 4,683 0.14 0.20 0.37 4,746 Elementa
ry
School
168 279 2,022 6.14 5.03 584 589 4.74 149 153 — 625,769 625,769 18.8 26.7 49.0 634,258 Junior
High
School

57.7 96.2 696 2.12 1.73 201 203 1.63 51.2 52.8 — 215,536 215,536 6.48 9.21 16.9 218,459 Place of
Worship

27.7 46.1 334 1.01 0.83 96.5 97.3 0.78 24.5 25.3 — 103,337 103,337 3.10 4.42 8.09 104,739 Total 1,356 2,194 15,914 48.0 39.3 4,559 4,598 37.1 1,159 1,196 — 4,885,936 4,885,936 150 210 382 4,952,625 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

25.9 35.5 280 0.82 0.66 75.8 76.5 0.62 19.3 19.9 — 75,765 75,765 2.33 3.15 96.5 76,857 Retireme
nt
Communi
ty

0.97 1.33 10.5 0.03 0.02 2.85 2.87 0.02 0.72 0.75 — 2,846 2,846 0.09 0.12 3.63 2,887 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

15.4 21.2 167 0.49 0.39 45.2 45.6 0.37 11.5 11.9 — 45,178 45,178 1.39 1.88 57.6 45,830 SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
10 / 32
Apartmen
Mid Rise

11.5 15.8 124 0.36 0.29 33.7 34.0 0.28 8.57 8.85 — 33,690 33,690 1.04 1.40 42.9 34,176 Strip Mall 126 198 1,557 4.70 3.77 436 440 3.55 111 114 — 434,310 434,310 12.4 17.6 555 440,411 General
Office
Building

5.27 8.30 65.3 0.20 0.16 18.3 18.5 0.15 4.65 4.80 — 18,225 18,225 0.52 0.74 23.3 18,481 City Park 0.12 0.19 1.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 0.11 0.11 — 415 415 0.01 0.02 0.53 421 Elementa
ry
School

21.8 34.4 271 0.82 0.66 75.8 76.4 0.62 19.3 19.9 — 75,484 75,484 2.15 3.05 96.5 76,544 Junior
High
School

7.52 11.8 93.2 0.28 0.23 26.1 26.3 0.21 6.64 6.85 — 25,999 25,999 0.74 1.05 33.2 26,364 Place of
Worship

1.78 2.81 22.1 0.07 0.05 6.19 6.25 0.05 1.57 1.63 — 6,169 6,169 0.18 0.25 7.88 6,256 Total 216 329 2,591 7.77 6.25 720 727 5.88 183 189 — 718,081 718,081 20.8 29.2 917 728,227

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 25,566 25,566 2.48 0.30 — 25,718
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
— — — — — — — — — — — 2,046 2,046 0.20 0.02 — 2,058
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
11 / 32
Apartmen——————————— 10,171 10,171 0.98 0.12— 10,231
ts
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————— 10,865 10,865 1.05 0.13— 10,929
Strip Mall——————————— 25,214 25,214 2.44 0.30— 25,363
General
Office
Building
——————————— 13,990 13,990 1.35 0.16— 14,073
City Park——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Elementa
ry
School
——————————— 6,710 6,710 0.65 0.08— 6,750
Junior
High
School
——————————— 2,237 2,237 0.22 0.03— 2,250
Place of
Worship
——————————— 1,764 1,764 0.17 0.02— 1,775
Total——————————— 98,563 98,563 9.55 1.16— 99,147
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————— 25,566 25,566 2.48 0.30— 25,718
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
——————————— 2,046 2,046 0.20 0.02— 2,058
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————— 10,171 10,171 0.98 0.12— 10,231
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————— 10,865 10,865 1.05 0.13— 10,929
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
12 / 32
Strip Mall——————————— 25,214 25,214 2.44 0.30— 25,363
General
Office
Building
——————————— 13,990 13,990 1.35 0.16— 14,073
City Park——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Elementa
ry
School
——————————— 6,710 6,710 0.65 0.08— 6,750
Junior
High
School
——————————— 2,237 2,237 0.22 0.03— 2,250
Place of
Worship
——————————— 1,764 1,764 0.17 0.02— 1,775
Total——————————— 98,563 98,563 9.55 1.16— 99,147
Annual—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————— 4,233 4,233 0.41 0.05— 4,258
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
——————————— 339 339 0.03 < 0.005— 341
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————— 1,684 1,684 0.16 0.02— 1,694
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————— 1,799 1,799 0.17 0.02— 1,809
Strip Mall——————————— 4,174 4,174 0.40 0.05— 4,199
General
Office
Building
——————————— 2,316 2,316 0.22 0.03— 2,330
City Park——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
13 / 32
Elementa — — — — — — — — — — — 1,111 1,111 0.11 0.01 — 1,117 ry
School
Junior
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — — 370 370 0.04 < 0.005 — 372
Place of
Worship
— — — — — — — — — — — 292 292 0.03 < 0.005 — 294
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 16,318 16,318 1.58 0.19 — 16,415

1.38 23.6 10.0 0.15 1.91 — 1.91 1.91 — 1.91 — 29,945 29,945 2.65 0.06 — 30,028 Retireme
nt
Communi
ty

0.11 1.89 0.81 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,401 2,401 0.21 < 0.005 — 2,408 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.55 9.41 4.00 0.06 0.76 — 0.76 0.76 — 0.76 — 11,939 11,939 1.06 0.02 — 11,972 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.52 8.97 3.82 0.06 0.73 — 0.73 0.73 — 0.73 — 11,387 11,387 1.01 0.02 — 11,418 Strip Mall 0.40 7.18 6.03 0.04 0.55 — 0.55 0.55 — 0.55 — 8,570 8,570 0.76 0.02 — 8,593 General
Office
Building

0.31 5.55 4.66 0.03 0.42 — 0.42 0.42 — 0.42 — 6,625 6,625 0.59 0.01 — 6,643 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
14 / 32
Elementa
School

1.00 18.2 15.3 0.11 1.38— 1.38 1.38— 1.38— 21,715 21,715 1.92 0.04— 21,775 Junior
High
School

0.33 6.07 5.10 0.04 0.46— 0.46 0.46— 0.46— 7,238 7,238 0.64 0.01— 7,258 Place of
Worship

0.11 2.04 1.71 0.01 0.15— 0.15 0.15— 0.15— 2,431 2,431 0.22 < 0.005— 2,438 Total 4.71 82.9 51.5 0.51 6.51— 6.51 6.51— 6.51— 102,251 102,251 9.05 0.19— 102,535 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing

1.38 23.6 10.0 0.15 1.91— 1.91 1.91— 1.91— 29,945 29,945 2.65 0.06— 30,028 Retireme
nt
Communi
ty

0.11 1.89 0.81 0.01 0.15— 0.15 0.15— 0.15— 2,401 2,401 0.21 < 0.005— 2,408 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.55 9.41 4.00 0.06 0.76— 0.76 0.76— 0.76— 11,939 11,939 1.06 0.02— 11,972 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.52 8.97 3.82 0.06 0.73— 0.73 0.73— 0.73— 11,387 11,387 1.01 0.02— 11,418 Strip Mall 0.40 7.18 6.03 0.04 0.55— 0.55 0.55— 0.55— 8,570 8,570 0.76 0.02— 8,593 General
Office
Building

0.31 5.55 4.66 0.03 0.42— 0.42 0.42— 0.42— 6,625 6,625 0.59 0.01— 6,643 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Elementa
ry
School

1.00 18.2 15.3 0.11 1.38— 1.38 1.38— 1.38— 21,715 21,715 1.92 0.04— 21,775 Junior
High
School

0.33 6.07 5.10 0.04 0.46— 0.46 0.46— 0.46— 7,238 7,238 0.64 0.01— 7,258 SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
15 / 32
Place of
Worship

0.11 2.04 1.71 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,431 2,431 0.22 < 0.005 — 2,438 Total 4.71 82.9 51.5 0.51 6.51 — 6.51 6.51 — 6.51 — 102,251 102,251 9.05 0.19 — 102,535 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.25 4.31 1.83 0.03 0.35 — 0.35 0.35 — 0.35 — 4,958 4,958 0.44 0.01 — 4,972 Retireme
nt
Communi
ty

0.02 0.35 0.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 398 398 0.04 < 0.005 — 399 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.10 1.72 0.73 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.14 — 0.14 — 1,977 1,977 0.17 < 0.005 — 1,982 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.10 1.64 0.70 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 1,885 1,885 0.17 < 0.005 — 1,890 Strip Mall 0.07 1.31 1.10 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,419 1,419 0.13 < 0.005 — 1,423 General
Office
Building

0.06 1.01 0.85 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,097 1,097 0.10 < 0.005 — 1,100 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Elementa
ry
School

0.18 3.32 2.79 0.02 0.25 — 0.25 0.25 — 0.25 — 3,595 3,595 0.32 0.01 — 3,605 Junior
High
School

0.06 1.11 0.93 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,198 1,198 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,202 Place of
Worship

0.02 0.37 0.31 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 402 402 0.04 < 0.005 — 404 Total 0.86 15.1 9.39 0.09 1.19 — 1.19 1.19 — 1.19 — 16,929 16,929 1.50 0.03 — 16,976

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
16 / 32

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 2,309 70.3 3,703 7.34 509 — 509 502 — 502 56,932 33,816 90,748 171 2.78 — 95,849 Consume
r
Products
384 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

35.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

86.7 6.92 761 0.04 0.70 — 0.70 0.53 — 0.53 — 2,414 2,414 0.10 0.02 — 2,422 Total 2,815 77.2 4,464 7.37 510 — 510 502 — 502 56,932 36,229 93,162 171 2.80 — 98,271 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 2,309 70.3 3,703 7.34 509 — 509 502 — 502 56,932 33,816 90,748 171 2.78 — 95,849 Consume
r
Products
384 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

35.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 2,728 70.3 3,703 7.34 509 — 509 502 — 502 56,932 33,816 90,748 171 2.78 — 95,849 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 94.7 2.88 152 0.30 20.9 — 20.9 20.6 — 20.6 2,118 1,258 3,375 6.36 0.10 — 3,565 SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
17 / 32
Consume 70.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
r
Products
Architectu
ral
Coatings

6.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

7.80 0.62 68.5 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 197 197 0.01 < 0.005 — 198 Total 179 3.50 220 0.30 20.9 — 20.9 20.6 — 20.6 2,118 1,455 3,572 6.37 0.10 — 3,763

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — 202 1,105 1,307 20.8 0.51 — 1,979
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
— — — — — — — — — — 31.0 47.4 78.4 3.19 0.08 — 181
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 154 236 390 15.9 0.38 — 899
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 162 248 410 16.7 0.40 — 945
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 440 671 1,111 45.2 1.08 — 2,563 SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
18 / 32
General
Office
Building
—————————— 244 372 616 25.0 0.60— 1,420
City Park—————————— 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005— < 0.005 Elementa
ry
School
—————————— 87.1 133 220 8.95 0.21— 508
Junior
High
School
—————————— 20.7 31.5 52.2 2.12 0.05— 120
Place of
Worship
—————————— 11.0 16.7 27.7 1.13 0.03— 63.9
Total—————————— 1,353 2,860 4,213 139 3.33— 8,679
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
—————————— 202 1,105 1,307 20.8 0.51— 1,979
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
—————————— 31.0 47.4 78.4 3.19 0.08— 181
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 154 236 390 15.9 0.38— 899
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 162 248 410 16.7 0.40— 945
Strip Mall—————————— 440 671 1,111 45.2 1.08— 2,563
General
Office
Building
—————————— 244 372 616 25.0 0.60— 1,420
City Park—————————— 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005— < 0.005 SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
19 / 32
Elementa—————————— 87.1 133 220 8.95 0.21— 508
ry
Junior
High
School
—————————— 20.7 31.5 52.2 2.12 0.05— 120
Place of
Worship
—————————— 11.0 16.7 27.7 1.13 0.03— 63.9
Total—————————— 1,353 2,860 4,213 139 3.33— 8,679
Annual—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
—————————— 33.5 183 216 3.45 0.08— 328
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
—————————— 5.14 7.84 13.0 0.53 0.01— 29.9
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 25.6 39.0 64.6 2.62 0.06— 149
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 26.9 41.0 67.8 2.76 0.07— 156
Strip Mall—————————— 72.8 111 184 7.48 0.18— 424
General
Office
Building
—————————— 40.4 61.6 102 4.15 0.10— 235
City Park—————————— 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005— < 0.005 Elementa
ry
School
—————————— 14.4 22.0 36.4 1.48 0.04— 84.0
Junior
High
School
—————————— 3.42 5.22 8.64 0.35 0.01— 19.9
Place of
Worship
—————————— 1.82 2.77 4.59 0.19 < 0.005— 10.6
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
20 / 32
Total — — — — — — — — — — 224 474 697 23.0 0.55 — 1,437

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — 1,005 0.00 1,005 100 0.00 — 3,516
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
— — — — — — — — — — 633 0.00 633 63.3 0.00 — 2,216
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 977 0.00 977 97.6 0.00 — 3,417
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 1,027 0.00 1,027 103 0.00 — 3,592
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 1,754 0.00 1,754 175 0.00 — 6,138 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — 359 0.00 359 35.9 0.00 — 1,256
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 — 17.0 Elementa
ry
School
— — — — — — — — — — 1,099 0.00 1,099 110 0.00 — 3,844
Junior
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — 366 0.00 366 36.6 0.00 — 1,281
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
21 / 32
Place of
Worship
—————————— 562 0.00 562 56.2 0.00— 1,966
Total—————————— 7,786 0.00 7,786 778 0.00— 27,242
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
—————————— 1,005 0.00 1,005 100 0.00— 3,516
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
—————————— 633 0.00 633 63.3 0.00— 2,216
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 977 0.00 977 97.6 0.00— 3,417
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 1,027 0.00 1,027 103 0.00— 3,592
Strip Mall—————————— 1,754 0.00 1,754 175 0.00— 6,138
General
Office
Building
—————————— 359 0.00 359 35.9 0.00— 1,256
City Park—————————— 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00— 17.0
Elementa
ry
School
—————————— 1,099 0.00 1,099 110 0.00— 3,844
Junior
High
School
—————————— 366 0.00 366 36.6 0.00— 1,281
Place of
Worship
—————————— 562 0.00 562 56.2 0.00— 1,966
Total—————————— 7,786 0.00 7,786 778 0.00— 27,242
Annual—————————————————
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
22 / 32
Single — — — — — — — — — — 166 0.00 166 16.6 0.00 — 582 Family
Housing
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
— — — — — — — — — — 105 0.00 105 10.5 0.00 — 367
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 162 0.00 162 16.2 0.00 — 566
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 170 0.00 170 17.0 0.00 — 595
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 290 0.00 290 29.0 0.00 — 1,016 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — 59.4 0.00 59.4 5.94 0.00 — 208
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.08 0.00 — 2.81 Elementa
ry
School
— — — — — — — — — — 182 0.00 182 18.2 0.00 — 636
Junior
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — 60.6 0.00 60.6 6.06 0.00 — 212
Place of
Worship
— — — — — — — — — — 93.0 0.00 93.0 9.30 0.00 — 326
Total — — — — — — — — — — 1,289 0.00 1,289 129 0.00 — 4,510

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
23 / 32
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————————— 44.9 44.9
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
——————————————— 6.64 6.64
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 18.6 18.6
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 17.7 17.7
Strip Mall——————————————— 19.3 19.3
General
Office
Building
——————————————— 1.74 1.74
City Park——————————————— 0.00 0.00
Elementa
ry
School
——————————————— 6.06 6.06
Junior
High
School
——————————————— 2.02 2.02
Place of
Worship
——————————————— 0.71 0.71
Total——————————————— 118 118
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————————— 44.9 44.9
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
24 / 32
Retireme
Community—
—————————————— 6.64 6.64
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 18.6 18.6
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 17.7 17.7
Strip Mall——————————————— 19.3 19.3
General
Office
Building
——————————————— 1.74 1.74
City Park——————————————— 0.00 0.00
Elementa
ry
School
——————————————— 6.06 6.06
Junior
High
School
——————————————— 2.02 2.02
Place of
Worship
——————————————— 0.71 0.71
Total——————————————— 118 118
Annual—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————————— 7.43 7.43
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
——————————————— 1.10 1.10
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 3.08 3.08
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
25 / 32
Apartmen — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.93 2.93
ts
Mid Rise
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.20 3.20
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.29 0.29
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Elementa
ry
School
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.00 1.00
Junior
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.33 0.33
Place of
Worship
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.12 0.12
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 19.5 19.5

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Single Family
Housing
30,321 30,642 27,463 10,934,955 594,314 600,610 538,282 214,331,157 Retirement
Community
1,183 1,001 961 410,789 23,191 19,616 18,843 8,051,686
Apartments Low
Rise
17,941 19,951 15,392 6,520,466 351,660 391,053 301,697 127,804,720 Apartments Mid Rise 14,013 12,648 10,536 4,862,384 274,671 247,911 206,508 95,305,409 Strip Mall 137,392 130,324 63,333 45,917,886 3,687,453 3,497,755 1,699,789 1,232,386,387 SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
26 / 32
General Office
Building
6,974 1,582 501 1,926,822 187,170 42,469 13,452 51,713,830 City Park 81.6 205 229 43,906 2,190 5,502 6,148 1,178,386 Elementary School 30,610 0.00 0.00 7,980,590 821,552 0.00 0.00 214,190,413 Junior High School 10,543 0.00 0.00 2,748,779 282,970 0.00 0.00 73,774,258 Place of Worship 1,272 1,096 5,055 652,218 34,126 29,412 135,668 17,504,826

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Single Family Housing —
Wood Fireplaces 482
Gas Fireplaces 1606
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 1124
Conventional Wood Stoves 161
Catalytic Wood Stoves 161
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 161
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Retirement Community —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 148
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
27 / 32
No Fireplaces 345
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Low Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 735
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 1716
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Mid Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 773
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 1803
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
28 / 32
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
24010425 8,003,475 9,134,745 3,044,915 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Single Family Housing 27,384,578 341 0.0330 0.0040 93,437,162 Retirement Community 2,191,320 341 0.0330 0.0040 7,493,172 Apartments Low Rise 10,894,373 341 0.0330 0.0040 37,253,072 Apartments Mid Rise 11,637,881 341 0.0330 0.0040 35,529,460 Strip Mall 27,007,431 341 0.0330 0.0040 26,739,362
General Office Building 14,985,405 341 0.0330 0.0040 20,670,219 City Park 0.00 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Elementary School 7,187,183 341 0.0330 0.0040 67,757,353 Junior High School 2,395,728 341 0.0330 0.0040 22,585,784 Place of Worship 1,889,866 341 0.0330 0.0040 7,584,852

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
29 / 32

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 105,566,957 529,034,343
Retirement Community 16,203,148 14.1
Apartments Low Rise 80,555,608 14.1
Apartments Mid Rise 84,663,911 14.1
Strip Mall 229,624,817 11.5
General Office Building 127,257,364 11.5
City Park 0.00 25.6
Elementary School 45,471,806 25.6
Junior High School 10,779,011 25.6
Place of Worship 5,724,306 11.5

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 1,864 —
Retirement Community 1,175 —
Apartments Low Rise 1,812 —
Apartments Mid Rise 1,905 —
Strip Mall 3,255 —
General Office Building 666 —
City Park 9.00 —
Elementary School 2,039 —
Junior High School 680 —
Place of Worship 1,043 —
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
30 / 32

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Single Family Housing Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Retirement Community Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Retirement Community Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.22 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
General Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
31 / 32
General Office Building Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
City Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
City Park Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Elementary School Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
Elementary School Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Elementary School Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 < 0.005 1.00 0.00 1.00
Elementary School Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Junior High School Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
Junior High School Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Junior High School Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 < 0.005 1.00 0.00 1.00
Junior High School Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Place of Worship Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
Place of Worship Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Place of Worship Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 < 0.005 1.00 0.00 1.00
Place of Worship Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
SVSP approved (baseline) Custom Report, 8/10/2023
32 / 32

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Adding acreage from SP and LU types. Excluded fire station and also kept non-land uses generic.

SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
1 / 32
SVSP with amendments Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
2 / 32

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
3 / 32

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
4 / 32

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name SVSP with amendments
Operational Year 2028
Lead Agency City of Roseville
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.50
Precipitation (days) 7.80
Location 38.764551917638784, -121.37971553454238
County Placer-Sacramento
City Roseville
Air District Placer County APCD
Air Basin Sacramento Valley
TAZ 432
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Roseville Electric
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.16

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Single Family
Housing
3,212 Dwelling Unit 596 6,263,400 37,621,697 — 8,383 —
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
5 / 32
Retirement
Community
493 Dwelling Unit 94.3 522,580 1.00 — 1,287 —
Apartments Low
Rise
2,451 Dwelling Unit 351 2,598,060 1.00 — 6,397 —
Apartments Mid Rise 2,842 Dwelling Unit 92.0 2,728,320 1.00 — 7,418 — Strip Mall 3,100 1000sqft 71.2 3,100,000 1.00 — — —
General Office
Building
716 1000sqft 16.4 716,000 1.00 — — —
City Park 105 Acre 105 0.00 1.00 1.00 — —
Elementary School 1,568 1000sqft 36.0 1,568,160 1.00 1.00 — — Junior High School 523 1000sqft 12.0 522,720 1.00 1.00 — — Place of Worship 183 1000sqft 4.20 182,950 1.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1,482 1,876 20,501 52.7 39.4 4,571 4,611 37.1 1,162 1,199 — 5,368,498 5,368,498 142 194 14,782 5,444,621 Area 2,822 77.3 4,479 7.37 510 — 510 502 — 502 56,932 36,270 93,202 171 2.80 — 98,312 Energy 4.77 83.8 51.8 0.52 6.59 — 6.59 6.59 — 6.59 — 203,112 203,112 18.8 1.36 — 203,989 Water — — — — — — — — — — 1,369 2,886 4,255 141 3.37 — 8,777 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 7,893 0.00 7,893 789 0.00 — 27,613 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 119 119
Total 4,309 2,038 25,032 60.6 556 4,571 5,127 546 1,162 1,709 66,194 5,610,766 5,676,960 1,261 201 14,901 5,783,431 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1,360 2,201 15,958 48.1 39.5 4,571 4,611 37.2 1,162 1,199 — 4,899,170 4,899,170 150 211 383 4,966,045 Area 2,734 70.3 3,703 7.34 509 — 509 502 — 502 56,932 33,816 90,748 171 2.78 — 95,849 Energy 4.77 83.8 51.8 0.52 6.59 — 6.59 6.59 — 6.59 — 203,112 203,112 18.8 1.36 — 203,989 Water — — — — — — — — — — 1,369 2,886 4,255 141 3.37 — 8,777 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 7,893 0.00 7,893 789 0.00 — 27,613 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 119 119
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
7 / 32
Total 4,099 2,355 19,713 55.9 555 4,571 5,126 546 1,162 1,708 66,194 5,138,984 5,205,178 1,269 218 503 5,302,392 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1,201 1,827 14,390 43.1 34.7 3,999 4,034 32.7 1,017 1,050 — 4,394,076 4,394,076 127 179 5,612 4,456,173 Area 987 19.3 1,215 1.67 115 — 115 113 — 113 12,790 8,807 21,597 38.5 0.63 — 22,748 Energy 4.77 83.8 51.8 0.52 6.59 — 6.59 6.59 — 6.59 — 203,112 203,112 18.8 1.36 — 203,989 Water — — — — — — — — — — 1,369 2,886 4,255 141 3.37 — 8,777 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 7,893 0.00 7,893 789 0.00 — 27,613 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 119 119
Total 2,193 1,930 15,656 45.3 156 3,999 4,155 152 1,017 1,169 22,052 4,608,881 4,630,933 1,114 184 5,731 4,719,419 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 219 333 2,626 7.87 6.33 730 736 5.96 186 192 — 727,489 727,489 21.1 29.6 929 737,770 Area 180 3.52 222 0.30 20.9 — 20.9 20.6 — 20.6 2,118 1,458 3,576 6.37 0.10 — 3,766 Energy 0.87 15.3 9.46 0.09 1.20 — 1.20 1.20 — 1.20 — 33,628 33,628 3.11 0.23 — 33,773 Water — — — — — — — — — — 227 478 704 23.3 0.56 — 1,453 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 1,307 0.00 1,307 131 0.00 — 4,572 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 19.8 19.8
Total 400 352 2,857 8.27 28.5 730 758 27.8 186 213 3,651 763,053 766,704 184 30.5 949 781,354

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
8 / 32
Single
Family
Housing
160 180 1,950 4.94 3.71 427 431 3.49 109 112— 502,755 502,755 14.0 18.6 1,381 510,014 Retireme
nt
Communi
ty

8.47 9.56 104 0.26 0.20 22.7 22.9 0.19 5.77 5.95— 26,693 26,693 0.74 0.98 73.3 27,078 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

82.9 93.6 1,014 2.57 1.93 222 224 1.82 56.5 58.3— 261,390 261,390 7.27 9.64 718 265,164 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

96.2 109 1,175 2.98 2.24 258 260 2.11 65.5 67.6— 303,089 303,089 8.43 11.2 833 307,465 Strip Mall 817 1,069 11,707 30.2 22.6 2,622 2,645 21.3 667 688— 3,077,991 3,077,991 80.1 111 8,480 3,121,433 General
Office
Building

62.7 82.0 898 2.32 1.73 201 203 1.63 51.2 52.8— 236,201 236,201 6.14 8.49 651 239,534 Place of
Worship

30.1 39.3 431 1.11 0.83 96.5 97.3 0.78 24.5 25.3— 113,245 113,245 2.95 4.07 312 114,843 Total 1,482 1,876 20,501 52.7 39.4 4,571 4,611 37.1 1,162 1,199— 5,368,498 5,368,498 142 194 14,782 5,444,621 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
145 211 1,542 4.50 3.71 427 431 3.50 109 112— 458,935 458,935 15.1 20.1 35.8 465,351 SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
9 / 32
Retireme 7.68 11.2 81.9 0.24 0.20 22.7 22.9 0.19 5.77 5.95 — 24,366 24,366 0.80 1.07 1.90 24,707 nt
Communi
ty
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

75.2 110 802 2.34 1.93 222 224 1.82 56.5 58.3 — 238,607 238,607 7.83 10.5 18.6 241,943 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

87.3 127 929 2.72 2.24 258 260 2.11 65.5 67.6 — 276,672 276,672 9.08 12.1 21.6 280,539 Strip Mall 752 1,254 9,076 27.6 22.6 2,622 2,645 21.3 667 688 — 2,808,700 2,808,700 84.4 120 220 2,846,802 General
Office
Building

57.7 96.2 696 2.12 1.73 201 203 1.63 51.2 52.8 — 215,536 215,536 6.48 9.21 16.9 218,459 Place of
Worship

27.7 46.1 334 1.01 0.83 96.5 97.3 0.78 24.5 25.3 — 103,337 103,337 3.10 4.42 8.09 104,739 Total 1,360 2,201 15,958 48.1 39.5 4,571 4,611 37.2 1,162 1,199 — 4,899,170 4,899,170 150 211 383 4,966,045 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

25.9 35.5 280 0.82 0.66 75.8 76.5 0.62 19.3 19.9 — 75,765 75,765 2.33 3.15 96.5 76,857 Retireme
nt
Communi
ty

1.40 1.93 15.2 0.04 0.04 4.12 4.15 0.03 1.05 1.08 — 4,114 4,114 0.13 0.17 5.24 4,174 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

13.8 18.9 149 0.44 0.35 40.3 40.7 0.33 10.3 10.6 — 40,290 40,290 1.24 1.67 51.3 40,871 SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
10 / 32
Apartmen
Mid Rise

16.0 21.9 173 0.51 0.41 46.8 47.2 0.38 11.9 12.3 — 46,718 46,718 1.44 1.94 59.5 47,391 Strip Mall 126 198 1,557 4.70 3.77 436 440 3.55 111 114 — 434,310 434,310 12.4 17.6 555 440,411 General
Office
Building

21.8 34.4 271 0.82 0.66 75.8 76.4 0.62 19.3 19.9 — 75,484 75,484 2.15 3.05 96.5 76,544 Junior
High
School

7.52 11.8 93.2 0.28 0.23 26.1 26.3 0.21 6.64 6.85 — 25,999 25,999 0.74 1.05 33.2 26,364 Place of
Worship

1.78 2.81 22.1 0.07 0.05 6.19 6.25 0.05 1.57 1.63 — 6,169 6,169 0.18 0.25 7.88 6,256 Total 219 333 2,626 7.87 6.33 730 736 5.96 186 192 — 727,489 727,489 21.1 29.6 929 737,770

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 25,566 25,566 2.48 0.30 — 25,718
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
— — — — — — — — — — — 2,046 2,046 0.20 0.02 — 2,058
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
11 / 32
Apartmen——————————— 10,171 10,171 0.98 0.12— 10,231
ts
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————— 11,987 11,987 1.16 0.14— 12,058
Strip Mall——————————— 25,214 25,214 2.44 0.30— 25,363
General
Office
Building
——————————— 13,990 13,990 1.35 0.16— 14,073
City Park——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Elementa
ry
School
——————————— 6,710 6,710 0.65 0.08— 6,750
Junior
High
School
——————————— 2,237 2,237 0.22 0.03— 2,250
Place of
Worship
——————————— 1,764 1,764 0.17 0.02— 1,775
Total——————————— 99,685 99,685 9.65 1.17— 100,275
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————— 25,566 25,566 2.48 0.30— 25,718
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
——————————— 2,046 2,046 0.20 0.02— 2,058
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————— 10,171 10,171 0.98 0.12— 10,231
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————— 11,987 11,987 1.16 0.14— 12,058
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
12 / 32
Strip Mall——————————— 25,214 25,214 2.44 0.30— 25,363
General
Office
Building
——————————— 13,990 13,990 1.35 0.16— 14,073
City Park——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Elementa
ry
School
——————————— 6,710 6,710 0.65 0.08— 6,750
Junior
High
School
——————————— 2,237 2,237 0.22 0.03— 2,250
Place of
Worship
——————————— 1,764 1,764 0.17 0.02— 1,775
Total——————————— 99,685 99,685 9.65 1.17— 100,275
Annual—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————— 4,233 4,233 0.41 0.05— 4,258
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
——————————— 339 339 0.03 < 0.005— 341
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————— 1,684 1,684 0.16 0.02— 1,694
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————— 1,985 1,985 0.19 0.02— 1,996
Strip Mall——————————— 4,174 4,174 0.40 0.05— 4,199
General
Office
Building
——————————— 2,316 2,316 0.22 0.03— 2,330
City Park——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
13 / 32
Elementa — — — — — — — — — — — 1,111 1,111 0.11 0.01 — 1,117 ry
School
Junior
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — — 370 370 0.04 < 0.005 — 372
Place of
Worship
— — — — — — — — — — — 292 292 0.03 < 0.005 — 294
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 16,504 16,504 1.60 0.19 — 16,602

1.38 23.6 10.0 0.15 1.91 — 1.91 1.91 — 1.91 — 29,945 29,945 2.65 0.06 — 30,028 Retireme
nt
Communi
ty

0.11 1.89 0.81 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,401 2,401 0.21 < 0.005 — 2,408 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.55 9.41 4.00 0.06 0.76 — 0.76 0.76 — 0.76 — 11,939 11,939 1.06 0.02 — 11,972 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.58 9.90 4.21 0.06 0.80 — 0.80 0.80 — 0.80 — 12,562 12,562 1.11 0.02 — 12,597 Strip Mall 0.40 7.18 6.03 0.04 0.55 — 0.55 0.55 — 0.55 — 8,570 8,570 0.76 0.02 — 8,593 General
Office
Building

0.31 5.55 4.66 0.03 0.42 — 0.42 0.42 — 0.42 — 6,625 6,625 0.59 0.01 — 6,643 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
14 / 32
Elementa
School

1.00 18.2 15.3 0.11 1.38— 1.38 1.38— 1.38— 21,715 21,715 1.92 0.04— 21,775 Junior
High
School

0.33 6.07 5.10 0.04 0.46— 0.46 0.46— 0.46— 7,238 7,238 0.64 0.01— 7,258 Place of
Worship

0.11 2.04 1.71 0.01 0.15— 0.15 0.15— 0.15— 2,431 2,431 0.22 < 0.005— 2,438 Total 4.77 83.8 51.8 0.52 6.59— 6.59 6.59— 6.59— 103,427 103,427 9.15 0.19— 103,714 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing

1.38 23.6 10.0 0.15 1.91— 1.91 1.91— 1.91— 29,945 29,945 2.65 0.06— 30,028 Retireme
nt
Communi
ty

0.11 1.89 0.81 0.01 0.15— 0.15 0.15— 0.15— 2,401 2,401 0.21 < 0.005— 2,408 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.55 9.41 4.00 0.06 0.76— 0.76 0.76— 0.76— 11,939 11,939 1.06 0.02— 11,972 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.58 9.90 4.21 0.06 0.80— 0.80 0.80— 0.80— 12,562 12,562 1.11 0.02— 12,597 Strip Mall 0.40 7.18 6.03 0.04 0.55— 0.55 0.55— 0.55— 8,570 8,570 0.76 0.02— 8,593 General
Office
Building

0.31 5.55 4.66 0.03 0.42— 0.42 0.42— 0.42— 6,625 6,625 0.59 0.01— 6,643 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Elementa
ry
School

1.00 18.2 15.3 0.11 1.38— 1.38 1.38— 1.38— 21,715 21,715 1.92 0.04— 21,775 Junior
High
School

0.33 6.07 5.10 0.04 0.46— 0.46 0.46— 0.46— 7,238 7,238 0.64 0.01— 7,258 SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
15 / 32
Place of
Worship

0.11 2.04 1.71 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,431 2,431 0.22 < 0.005 — 2,438 Total 4.77 83.8 51.8 0.52 6.59 — 6.59 6.59 — 6.59 — 103,427 103,427 9.15 0.19 — 103,714 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.25 4.31 1.83 0.03 0.35 — 0.35 0.35 — 0.35 — 4,958 4,958 0.44 0.01 — 4,972 Retireme
nt
Communi
ty

0.02 0.35 0.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 398 398 0.04 < 0.005 — 399 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.10 1.72 0.73 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.14 — 0.14 — 1,977 1,977 0.17 < 0.005 — 1,982 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.11 1.81 0.77 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,080 2,080 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,086 Strip Mall 0.07 1.31 1.10 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,419 1,419 0.13 < 0.005 — 1,423 General
Office
Building

0.06 1.01 0.85 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,097 1,097 0.10 < 0.005 — 1,100 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Elementa
ry
School

0.18 3.32 2.79 0.02 0.25 — 0.25 0.25 — 0.25 — 3,595 3,595 0.32 0.01 — 3,605 Junior
High
School

0.06 1.11 0.93 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,198 1,198 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,202 Place of
Worship

0.02 0.37 0.31 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 402 402 0.04 < 0.005 — 404 Total 0.87 15.3 9.46 0.09 1.20 — 1.20 1.20 — 1.20 — 17,123 17,123 1.52 0.03 — 17,171

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
16 / 32

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 2,309 70.3 3,703 7.34 509 — 509 502 — 502 56,932 33,816 90,748 171 2.78 — 95,849 Consume
r
Products
390 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

35.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

88.0 7.06 776 0.04 0.71 — 0.71 0.54 — 0.54 — 2,454 2,454 0.10 0.02 — 2,463 Total 2,822 77.3 4,479 7.37 510 — 510 502 — 502 56,932 36,270 93,202 171 2.80 — 98,312 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 2,309 70.3 3,703 7.34 509 — 509 502 — 502 56,932 33,816 90,748 171 2.78 — 95,849 Consume
r
Products
390 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

35.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 2,734 70.3 3,703 7.34 509 — 509 502 — 502 56,932 33,816 90,748 171 2.78 — 95,849 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 94.7 2.88 152 0.30 20.9 — 20.9 20.6 — 20.6 2,118 1,258 3,375 6.36 0.10 — 3,565 SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
17 / 32
Consume 71.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
r
Products
Architectu
ral
Coatings

6.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

7.92 0.64 69.9 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 200 200 0.01 < 0.005 — 201 Total 180 3.52 222 0.30 20.9 — 20.9 20.6 — 20.6 2,118 1,458 3,576 6.37 0.10 — 3,766

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — 202 1,105 1,307 20.8 0.51 — 1,979
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
— — — — — — — — — — 31.0 47.4 78.4 3.19 0.08 — 181
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 154 236 390 15.9 0.38 — 899
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 179 273 452 18.4 0.44 — 1,042
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 440 671 1,111 45.2 1.08 — 2,563 SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
18 / 32
General
Office
Building
—————————— 244 372 616 25.0 0.60— 1,420
City Park—————————— 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005— < 0.005 Elementa
ry
School
—————————— 87.1 133 220 8.95 0.21— 508
Junior
High
School
—————————— 20.7 31.5 52.2 2.12 0.05— 120
Place of
Worship
—————————— 11.0 16.7 27.7 1.13 0.03— 63.9
Total—————————— 1,369 2,886 4,255 141 3.37— 8,777
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
—————————— 202 1,105 1,307 20.8 0.51— 1,979
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
—————————— 31.0 47.4 78.4 3.19 0.08— 181
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 154 236 390 15.9 0.38— 899
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 179 273 452 18.4 0.44— 1,042
Strip Mall—————————— 440 671 1,111 45.2 1.08— 2,563
General
Office
Building
—————————— 244 372 616 25.0 0.60— 1,420
City Park—————————— 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005— < 0.005 SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
19 / 32
Elementa—————————— 87.1 133 220 8.95 0.21— 508
ry
Junior
High
School
—————————— 20.7 31.5 52.2 2.12 0.05— 120
Place of
Worship
—————————— 11.0 16.7 27.7 1.13 0.03— 63.9
Total—————————— 1,369 2,886 4,255 141 3.37— 8,777
Annual—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
—————————— 33.5 183 216 3.45 0.08— 328
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
—————————— 5.14 7.84 13.0 0.53 0.01— 29.9
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 25.6 39.0 64.6 2.62 0.06— 149
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 29.6 45.2 74.8 3.04 0.07— 173
Strip Mall—————————— 72.8 111 184 7.48 0.18— 424
General
Office
Building
—————————— 40.4 61.6 102 4.15 0.10— 235
City Park—————————— 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005— < 0.005 Elementa
ry
School
—————————— 14.4 22.0 36.4 1.48 0.04— 84.0
Junior
High
School
—————————— 3.42 5.22 8.64 0.35 0.01— 19.9
Place of
Worship
—————————— 1.82 2.77 4.59 0.19 < 0.005— 10.6
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
20 / 32
Total — — — — — — — — — — 227 478 704 23.3 0.56 — 1,453

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — 1,005 0.00 1,005 100 0.00 — 3,516
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
— — — — — — — — — — 633 0.00 633 63.3 0.00 — 2,216
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 977 0.00 977 97.6 0.00 — 3,417
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 1,133 0.00 1,133 113 0.00 — 3,963
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 1,754 0.00 1,754 175 0.00 — 6,138 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — 359 0.00 359 35.9 0.00 — 1,256
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 — 17.0 Elementa
ry
School
— — — — — — — — — — 1,099 0.00 1,099 110 0.00 — 3,844
Junior
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — 366 0.00 366 36.6 0.00 — 1,281
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
21 / 32
Place of
Worship
—————————— 562 0.00 562 56.2 0.00— 1,966
Total—————————— 7,893 0.00 7,893 789 0.00— 27,613
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
—————————— 1,005 0.00 1,005 100 0.00— 3,516
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
—————————— 633 0.00 633 63.3 0.00— 2,216
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 977 0.00 977 97.6 0.00— 3,417
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 1,133 0.00 1,133 113 0.00— 3,963
Strip Mall—————————— 1,754 0.00 1,754 175 0.00— 6,138
General
Office
Building
—————————— 359 0.00 359 35.9 0.00— 1,256
City Park—————————— 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00— 17.0
Elementa
ry
School
—————————— 1,099 0.00 1,099 110 0.00— 3,844
Junior
High
School
—————————— 366 0.00 366 36.6 0.00— 1,281
Place of
Worship
—————————— 562 0.00 562 56.2 0.00— 1,966
Total—————————— 7,893 0.00 7,893 789 0.00— 27,613
Annual—————————————————
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
22 / 32
Single — — — — — — — — — — 166 0.00 166 16.6 0.00 — 582 Family
Housing
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
— — — — — — — — — — 105 0.00 105 10.5 0.00 — 367
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 162 0.00 162 16.2 0.00 — 566
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 188 0.00 188 18.7 0.00 — 656
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 290 0.00 290 29.0 0.00 — 1,016 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — 59.4 0.00 59.4 5.94 0.00 — 208
City Park — — — — — — — — — — 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.08 0.00 — 2.81 Elementa
ry
School
— — — — — — — — — — 182 0.00 182 18.2 0.00 — 636
Junior
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — 60.6 0.00 60.6 6.06 0.00 — 212
Place of
Worship
— — — — — — — — — — 93.0 0.00 93.0 9.30 0.00 — 326
Total — — — — — — — — — — 1,307 0.00 1,307 131 0.00 — 4,572

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
23 / 32
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————————— 44.9 44.9
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
——————————————— 6.64 6.64
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 18.6 18.6
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 19.5 19.5
Strip Mall——————————————— 19.3 19.3
General
Office
Building
——————————————— 1.74 1.74
City Park——————————————— 0.00 0.00
Elementa
ry
School
——————————————— 6.06 6.06
Junior
High
School
——————————————— 2.02 2.02
Place of
Worship
——————————————— 0.71 0.71
Total——————————————— 119 119
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————————— 44.9 44.9
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
24 / 32
Retireme
Community—
—————————————— 6.64 6.64
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 18.6 18.6
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 19.5 19.5
Strip Mall——————————————— 19.3 19.3
General
Office
Building
——————————————— 1.74 1.74
City Park——————————————— 0.00 0.00
Elementa
ry
School
——————————————— 6.06 6.06
Junior
High
School
——————————————— 2.02 2.02
Place of
Worship
——————————————— 0.71 0.71
Total——————————————— 119 119
Annual—————————————————
Single
Family
Housing
——————————————— 7.43 7.43
Retireme
nt
Communi
ty
——————————————— 1.10 1.10
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 3.08 3.08
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
25 / 32
Apartmen — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.24 3.24
ts
Mid Rise
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.20 3.20
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.29 0.29
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Elementa
ry
School
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.00 1.00
Junior
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.33 0.33
Place of
Worship
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.12 0.12
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 19.8 19.8

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Single Family
Housing
30,321 30,642 27,463 10,934,955 594,314 600,610 538,282 214,331,157 Retirement
Community
1,627 1,627 1,627 593,818 31,888 31,888 31,888 11,639,170 Apartments Low
Rise
15,931 15,931 15,931 5,814,998 312,266 312,266 312,266 113,977,158 Apartments Mid Rise 18,473 18,473 18,473 6,742,645 362,081 362,081 362,081 132,159,560 Strip Mall 137,392 130,324 63,333 45,917,886 3,687,453 3,497,755 1,699,789 1,232,386,387 SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
26 / 32
General Office
Building
6,974 1,582 501 1,926,822 187,170 42,469 13,452 51,713,830 City Park 81.6 205 229 43,906 2,190 5,502 6,148 1,178,386 Elementary School 30,610 0.00 0.00 7,980,590 821,552 0.00 0.00 214,190,413 Junior High School 10,543 0.00 0.00 2,748,779 282,970 0.00 0.00 73,774,258 Place of Worship 1,272 1,096 5,055 652,218 34,126 29,412 135,668 17,504,826

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Single Family Housing —
Wood Fireplaces 482
Gas Fireplaces 1606
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 1124
Conventional Wood Stoves 161
Catalytic Wood Stoves 161
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 161
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Retirement Community —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 148
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
27 / 32
No Fireplaces 345
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Low Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 735
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 1716
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Mid Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 853
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 1989
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
28 / 32
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
24527529 8,175,843 9,134,745 3,044,915 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Single Family Housing 27,384,578 341 0.0330 0.0040 93,437,162 Retirement Community 2,191,320 341 0.0330 0.0040 7,493,172 Apartments Low Rise 10,894,373 341 0.0330 0.0040 37,253,072 Apartments Mid Rise 12,839,619 341 0.0330 0.0040 39,198,263 Strip Mall 27,007,431 341 0.0330 0.0040 26,739,362
General Office Building 14,985,405 341 0.0330 0.0040 20,670,219 City Park 0.00 341 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Elementary School 7,187,183 341 0.0330 0.0040 67,757,353 Junior High School 2,395,728 341 0.0330 0.0040 22,585,784 Place of Worship 1,889,866 341 0.0330 0.0040 7,584,852

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
29 / 32

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 105,566,957 529,034,343
Retirement Community 16,203,148 14.1
Apartments Low Rise 80,555,608 14.1
Apartments Mid Rise 93,406,380 14.1
Strip Mall 229,624,817 11.5
General Office Building 127,257,364 11.5
City Park 0.00 25.6
Elementary School 45,471,806 25.6
Junior High School 10,779,011 25.6
Place of Worship 5,724,306 11.5

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 1,864 —
Retirement Community 1,175 —
Apartments Low Rise 1,812 —
Apartments Mid Rise 2,102 —
Strip Mall 3,255 —
General Office Building 666 —
City Park 9.00 —
Elementary School 2,039 —
Junior High School 680 —
Place of Worship 1,043 —
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
30 / 32

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Single Family Housing Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Retirement Community Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Retirement Community Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.22 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
General Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
31 / 32
General Office Building Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
City Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
City Park Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Elementary School Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
Elementary School Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Elementary School Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 < 0.005 1.00 0.00 1.00
Elementary School Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Junior High School Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
Junior High School Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Junior High School Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 < 0.005 1.00 0.00 1.00
Junior High School Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Place of Worship Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
Place of Worship Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Place of Worship Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 < 0.005 1.00 0.00 1.00
Place of Worship Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
SVSP with amendments Custom Report, 8/10/2023
32 / 32

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Adding acreage from SP and LU types. Excluded fire station and also kept non-land uses generic.

Added 266 HD units as proposed project.

Operations: Vehicle Data Using 3.3 trips/du age restricted uses and 6.5 trips/du for MF uses per transportation analysis.

Attachment B
(Combined CEQA Document)— Transportation Impact Analysis for Rezoning of Various Parcels in the Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan (Fehr & Peers, August 7, 2023)
1013 Galleria Boulevard Suite 255 Roseville, CA 95678 | (916) 773-1900 | www.fehrandpeers.com Technical Memorandum
Date: August 7, 2023
To: Scott Canel, Pine Island Apartments LLC, FD34 Development LLC From: John Gard, PE & Adrita Islam, Fehr & Peers
Subject: Transportation Impact Analysis for Rezoning of Various Parcels in the Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan
RS23-4280
This technical memorandum documents the trip generation and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) estimates for the existing and proposed land uses for the following parcels in the Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan within the City of Roseville:
• Campus Oaks Master Plan (COMP) Parcel CO-52
• Sierra Vista Specific Plan (SVSP) Parcels WB-30, WB-32, WB-52, and FD-34 This analysis has been prepared in accordance with current California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and specific methods related to VMT analysis utilized by the City of Roseville.

Project Description
According to the Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Amendments Project Scope of Work for Preparation of CEQA Documentation (Remy Moose Manley, June 13, 2023), the proposed project would result in rezonings, unit transfers, and/or density bonuses to 5 distinct parcels in these two plan areas. These changes are described below:

COMP Parcel CO-52: The proposed project would rezone this parcel from MP/SA (Industrial/Business Park/Special Area) to R3 (Multi-Family Housing). It would also redesignate the land use from T/BP LI (Tech Park/Business Professional – Light Industrial) to HDR (High-Density Residential in both the General Plan and Master Plan). Within the City’s travel demand model, it would replace 150,000 square feet of high-tech industrial space with 285 multi-family dwelling units. This 17.65-acre parcel is situated on the east side of Roseville Parkway south of Blue Oaks Boulevard.

SVSP Parcel WB-30: The proposed project would increase the number of multi-family units on this parcel from 237 to 355. All units would be affordable and intended for senior citizens. This 8.06-acre parcel is situated in the northeast quadrant of the Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Santucci Boulevard intersection.

Transportation Impact Analysis for Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan Parcels August 7, 2023
Page | 2
SVSP Parcel WB-32: The proposed project would increase the number of multi-family dwelling units on this parcel from 128 to 192. This 5.11-acre parcel is situated on the west side of Santucci Boulevard opposite Solaire Drive.

SVSP Parcel WB-52: The proposed project would rezone and redesignate (in the General Plan and Specific Plan) this parcel from Park uses (PR) to High-Density Residential (HDR). Parcel WB-52 would be developed for private recreational facilities to serve current and future residents of Parcels WB-30, WB-31, and W-16 and not with housing. This 1.5-acre parcel is situated between SVSP Parcels WB-30 and WB-31.

SVSP Parcel FD-34: The proposed project would increase the number of multi-family dwelling units on this parcel from 172 to 256. This 7.04-acre parcel is situated in the southeast quadrant of the Westbrook Boulevard/Federico Drive intersection.

The above explanation intentionally does not describe whether unit transfers, rezonings, or density bonuses are being applied for specific parcels. See the Combined CEQA Document project description for those details. Instead, the net change in land use to be made within the City’s travel demand model for “No Project” and “Plus Project” is described.

Table 1 summarizes the land use changes associated with the proposed project. The proposed project would replace 150,000 square feet of high tech industrial space in the Campus Oaks Master Plan with 285 multi-family dwelling units. It would result in a net increase of 266 multi-family dwelling units within the Sierra Vista Specific Plan.

The City of Roseville travel demand model includes single-family, multi-family, and single-family agerestricted land use categories. But like most travel demand models, it does not differentiate between market-rate and affordable units, and it also does not have a land use category for affordable, attached, senior housing. Hence, Table 1 does not differentiate between affordable versus market and traditional versus age-restricted units.

Transportation Impact Analysis for Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan Parcels August 7, 2023
Page | 3
Table 1: Existing Zoning and Proposed Project Land Use
Parcel
Existing Zoning Proposed Amendment
Land Use
Designation
Residential
(DU)
NonResidential
(KSF)
Land Use
Designation
Residential
(DU)
NonResidential
(KSF)
CO-52 T/BP LI
(MP/SA) 0 150 HDR (R3) 285 0
Campus Oaks MP Total - 0 150 - 285 0
Campus Oaks MP Change - - - - +285 -150
WB-30 HDR (R3) 237 - HDR (R3) 355 -
WB-32 HDR (R3) 128 - HDR (R3) 192 -
WB-52 PR - - HDR (R3) 0 -
FD-34 HDR (R3) 172 - HDR (R3) 256 -
Sierra Vista SP Total - 537 0 - 803 0
Sierra Vista SP Change - - - - +266 0
Both Plan Total - 537 150 1,088 0
Both Plans Change +551 -150
Notes:

Land Use Designation
T/BP LI (MP/SA) – Tech Park/Business Professional – Light Industrial (Industrial/Business Park/Special Area) HDR (R3) – High-Density Residential (Multi-Family Housing) PR – Park/ Open Space
Source:

Campus Oaks and Sierra Vista Amendments Project– Scope of Work for Preparation of CEQA Documentation (Remy Moose Manley, June 13, 2023)
Project Travel Characteristics – Trip Generation
Table 2 shows the trip generation comparison for daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour conditions between the “No Project” and “Plus Project” scenarios. The comparison was performed using trip rates from the City of Roseville travel demand model. This model was calibrated to 2019/2020 conditions and found to meet all applicable Caltrans standards for model validation. The use of City of Roseville model trip rates is appropriate (versus other data sources) because the subsequent VMT calculations using the City’s travel demand model rely on those same trip rates.

Transportation Impact Analysis for Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan Parcels August 7, 2023
Page | 4
Table 2: Proposed Project Trip Generation
Table 2 shows that for Campus Oaks MP, the proposed project would cause a net increase of 278 daily trips generated by Parcel CO-52 and a net increase of 593 daily trips in the Sierra Vista SP. Overall, a net increase of 871 daily trips is expected.1
1 These calculations focus solely on the net change in trips generated by each parcel. Results could differ if the trip generation comparison instead focused on the entire specific or master plan. However, that metric is also addressed to some degree by the VMT calculations the follow.

Parcel
Existing Zoning Trip Generation Proposed Amendment Trip Generation Model
Land
Use
Daily
AM
Peak
Hour
PM
Peak
Hour
Model
Land
Use
Daily
AM
Peak
Hour
PM
Peak
Hour
CO-52 HTI 1,575 108 183 MFDU 1,853 126 165
Campus Oaks MP Total - 1,575 108 183 - 1,853 126 165
Campus Oaks MP Change - - - - - +278 +18 -18
WB-30 MFDU 1,541 104 137 ARDU 1 1,172 53 85
WB-32 MFDU 832 56 74 MFDU 1,248 84 111
WB-52 MFDU 0 0 0 MFDU 0 0 0
FD-34 MFDU 1,118 76 100 MFDU 1,664 113 148
Sierra Vista SP Total -- 3,491 238 311 - 4,084 250 345
Sierra Vista SP Change - - - - - +593 +12 +34
Both Plans Total - 5,066 346 494 - 5,937 376 510
Both Plans Change - +871 +30 +16
Notes:
1 These trip rates represent detached, market-rate, single-family, active-adult (55+) units. They were nonetheless used here to represent the affordable, senior housing proposed on this parcel because the resulting trip generation estimates are more reasonable than applying standard multi-family which is nearly twice as high. The ARDU trip estimates shown are still an overestimate because they do not consider that these units are attached and affordable.

Model Land Use and Trip Generation Rates:

HTI – High-Tech Industrial (Daily 10.5/KSF, AM Peak Hour 0.72/KSF, PM Peak Hour 1.22/KSF) MFDU – Multi-Family Residential (Daily 6.5/DU, AM Peak Hour 0.44/DU, PM Peak Hour 0.58/DU) ARDU – Age-Restricted Residential (Daily 3.3/DU, AM Peak Hour 0.15/DU, PM Peak Hour 0.24/DU).

Source:

City of Roseville Travel Demand Model Development Report (Fehr & Peers, 2021) Fehr & Peers, 2023
Transportation Impact Analysis for Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan Parcels August 7, 2023
Page | 5
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
Regulatory Background
Senate Bill 743
Senate Bill (SB) 743, passed in 2013, required the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop new CEQA guidelines that address traffic metrics under CEQA. As stated in the legislation, upon adoption of the new guidelines, “automobile delay, as described solely by level of service or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment pursuant to this division, except in locations specifically identified in the guidelines, if any.” In December 2018, OPR published Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (“Technical Advisory”), which provided guidance for implementing SB 743. On December 28, 2018, the Resources Agency adopted CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3. Under this guideline, VMT is the primary metric used to identify transportation impacts. On July 1, 2020, the provisions of Section 15064.3 became effective statewide.

VMT is now utilized in CEQA to analyze a proposed project’s impacts to the roadway system (in lieu of intersection Level of Service). Since the prior CEQA analyses performed for the study areas did not consider VMT in their traffic impact assessments, it is not necessarily required here. Nevertheless, they were performed here to provide a complete understanding of the project’s transportation effects on VMT.

City of Roseville 2035 General Plan
• Policy CIRC4.3: Specific Plan Amendments and land use development projects not included in a Specific Plan shall be evaluated for consistency with the City’s VMT Impact Standards. • Policy CIRC4.4: If the evaluation required by CIRC4.3 finds a Specific Plan Amendment or land use development project not included in an adopted Specific Plan is inconsistent with thresholds established within the City’s VMT Impact Standards, on-site land use, transportation, and urban designrelated VMT-reducing features should be prioritized to demonstrate consistency. If feasible on-site features cannot achieve the VMT threshold, Specific Plan Amendments and land use development projects outside Specific Plan Areas may demonstrate equivalent consistency through off-site actions or fair-share fee contributions, or if consistency cannot be achieved, shall implement all feasible measures.

City of Roseville Design Standards (2023)
Section 4 of the City of Roseville Design Standards (2023) contains helpful guidance on how to calculate VMT, how to set VMT significance of impact thresholds. Specific language is as follows:
• VMT estimates are to be produced using the City of Roseville travel demand model. • A land use amendment or rezone which only slightly increases trip generation may not require extensive modeling in order to demonstrate the VMT increase is minor or absent. • If a proposed project can be shown to result in a net overall decrease in total City VMT when compared to baseline VMT, the project would lead to a less-than-significant VMT impact.

Transportation Impact Analysis for Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan Parcels August 7, 2023
Page | 6
While Table 2 shows a modest 871 daily trip increase associated with the proposed project2, a VMT analysis was nonetheless performed because there would be a net increase in units within the SVSP, which is in the most westerly part of the City (i.e., further from downtown, SR 65, etc. than most other planning areas).

Because VMT is the product of trip rate and trip length, it made sense to further explore this topic given this geographic consideration.

VMT Analysis
By definition, one vehicle mile traveled (VMT) occurs when one vehicle is driven on a roadway for one mile.

Regardless of how many people are traveling in the vehicle, each vehicle traveling on a roadway generates one VMT for each mile it travels.

For the purposes of this study, the total VMT generated by the SVSP and North Industrial Area (for which the Campus Oaks Master Plan belongs) was calculated in a manner consistent with City suggested practices.

Per the City of Roseville Design Standards (2023), VMT is calculated for a typical weekday and represents the full length of a given trip (i.e., are not truncated at jurisdiction boundaries). The VMT values are for trips beginning or ending in the City. Trips passing through the City without stopping are not included in these VMT estimates.

The VMT calculations were performed for each specific plan or planning area for the following scenarios:
• Existing Zoning (i.e., “No Project”)
• Proposed Land Use Amendments (“Proposed Project”)
The results are shown in Table 3. Refer to Appendix A for calculations.

Table 3: Total Weekday VMT Generated by the Plan Areas
Specific Plan Total Weekday VMT for
Existing Zoning/Use
Total Weekday VMT for Proposed
Amendment Zoning/Use Change in VMT
Campus Oaks
(North Industrial) 1,278,346 1,273,457 -4,889 (-0.4%)
Sierra Vista 863,187 865,700 +2,513(+0.3%)
Combined Change -2,376
Notes:

Total VMT is calculated using City of Roseville Cumulative (2035) Travel Demand Model Source:

Fehr & Peers, 2023.
2 ‘Modest’ is used in this context because the corresponding increase during the PM peak hour (16 trips per Table 2) is considerably less than the minimum 50 peak hour trip threshold the City of Roseville utilizes to determine whether a transportation impact study is needed.

Transportation Impact Analysis for Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan Parcels August 7, 2023
Page | 7
Table 3 indicates that the proposed project would result in a net combined decrease of 2,376 VMT in the Campus Oaks North Industrial Planning Area and Sierra Vista Specific Plan area. Accordingly, VMT impacts associated with the proposed project would be considered less-than-significant and no mitigation is recommended.
3 We decided to further explore why a net decrease in VMT is projected despite the net increase in daily trips.

SVSP Parcel WB-30 is one of the drivers of this finding. The 237 multi-family units permitted under the existing zoning would have an average trip rate of 6.5 trips per day averaging 6.7 miles in length. This results in 10,321 VMT. In contrast, the proposed age-restricted uses (355 units) would have an average trip rate of 3.3 trips per day averaging 5.6 miles in length. This results in 6,560 VMT or a 3,700 VMT savings (despite adding 118 units). Additionally, for Campus Oaks Parcel CO-52, the average trip length with multifamily zoning is 5.0 miles, whereas the average trip length of the existing industrial/business land use type is 7.6 miles, a 52% increase. This more than offsets the 18% increase in daily trips generated with the rezone, resulting in a net decrease of 2,700 VMT generated by that parcel.

General Plan LOS Policy Consistency Evaluation
Although LOS is no longer used to analyze a proposed project’s impacts to the roadway system under CEQA, it was assessed in a limited capacity for the City’s use to consider the proposed project’s consistency with the City of Roseville General Plan LOS policy. This policy requires that at least 70% of signalized intersections operate at LOS C or better during peak hours. Under cumulative PM peak hour conditions, about 72% are projected to operate at LOS C.

Parcels WB-30 and WB-32 are situated less than one mile to the west of the signalized Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard intersection, which operates near the cusp of LOS C/D under cumulative PM peak hour conditions. Thus, the City would be interested in knowing whether the proposed land use amendments would cause this intersection to worsen from LOS C to D, which would be one degraded intersection closer to not meeting the applicable General Plan LOS policy standard.

The City of Roseville travel demand model was used to develop cumulative PM peak hour forecasts at this intersection assuming the proposed land use amendments. Traffic operations were then analyzed at this intersection using the same analysis methodology (i.e., Synchro) as was used in the General Plan analysis.

Table 4 presents the results. See Appendix B for technical calculations. 3 As a check, we also calculated the net change in citywide VMT between the No Project and Proposed Project scenarios. A net decrease of 8,565 VMT is expected. This value is only slightly different than the decrease shown in Table 3, with the change attributable to ‘noise’ in the model (i.e., changes in travel behaviors from adjacent plan areas due to the rezonings).

Transportation Impact Analysis for Campus Oaks Master Plan and Sierra Vista Specific Plan Parcels August 7, 2023
Page | 8
Table 4: PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations – Cumulative Conditions Intersection Traffic
Control
Existing Zoning Proposed Amendment
Delay LOS Delay LOS
Westbrook Boulevard / Pleasant Grove Boulevard Signal 34.2 C 34.4 C Note:

Average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle. The cusp between LOS C and D is 35 seconds.

Cumulative results for Existing Zoning are from cumulative plus project analysis for Roseville Soccer Complex TIS (Fehr & Peers, 2022).

Source:

Fehr & Peers, 2023.

According to Table 4, the Westbrook Boulevard/Pleasant Grove Boulevard intersection would continue to operate at a cumulative LOS C during the PM peak hour with the proposed land use amendments. Thus, the proposed land use amendments would not contribute to further declines in the proportion of signalized intersections that would cumulatively operate at LOS C or better during the PM peak hour4. 4 As Table 2 shows, the proposed project would result in a net increase of 16 PM peak hour trips. Thus, it is highly unlikely that a signalized intersection elsewhere in the city would degrade from LOS C to D due to the project.

Appendix A – VMT Calcula�ons
AREA VOL_II VOL_IX VOL_XI VOL_TOT VMT_II VMT_IX VMT_XI VMT_TOT Subarea 2 430,978.40 448,357.34 448,357.34 1,327,693.08 1,229,129.40 4,428,697.75 4,437,028.79 10,094,855.90 City of Roseville 3 35,059.59 155,043.75 155,043.75 345,147.09 63,136.46 1,175,866.46 1,182,457.46 2,421,460.38 Infill 4 1,174.39 19,031.17 19,031.17 39,236.73 432.55 130,288.67 131,497.06 262,218.28 Downtown 5 98.18 4,874.90 4,874.90 9,847.98 9.82 33,468.79 33,407.69 66,886.30 Riverside Gateway 6 11,980.72 85,815.36 85,815.36 183,611.44 9,725.01 685,825.34 687,028.06 1,382,578.41 Northeast Roseville 7 6,726.87 47,653.27 47,653.27 102,033.41 8,276.33 298,934.11 298,955.55 606,165.99 Northwest Roseville 8 326.01 8,017.73 8,017.73 16,361.47 332.78 49,552.99 49,498.86 99,384.63 Del Webb 9 10,808.45 77,960.03 77,960.03 166,728.51 12,312.07 636,369.03 629,664.65 1,278,345.75 North Industrial 10 20,139.07 104,743.78 104,743.78 229,626.63 21,550.00 813,289.80 819,015.80 1,653,855.60 North Central Roseville 11 2,397.64 30,728.34 30,728.34 63,854.32 1,574.39 206,341.80 206,598.14 414,514.33 Highland Reserve North 12 914.77 17,290.44 17,290.44 35,495.65 898.08 110,637.94 111,165.35 222,701.37 Stoneridge 13 3,320.16 32,667.79 32,667.79 68,655.74 3,078.42 234,072.28 235,546.07 472,696.77 Southeast Roseville 14 2,029.77 29,525.94 29,525.94 61,081.65 2,534.42 173,743.62 173,160.19 349,438.23 North Roseville 15 9,454.21 51,344.24 51,344.24 112,142.69 12,916.92 335,938.33 335,027.50 683,882.75 West Roseville 16 18,158.10 59,101.70 59,101.70 136,361.50 20,959.66 421,142.29 421,084.76 863,186.71 Sierra Vista 17 3,399.22 17,357.28 17,357.28 38,113.78 1,825.57 121,151.48 121,135.80 244,112.85 Amoruso Ranch 18 761.19 11,431.68 11,431.68 23,624.55 429.03 71,212.71 70,923.74 142,565.48 Creekview Total VMT by Plan Area - Existing Zoning
AREA VOL_II VOL_IX VOL_XI VOL_TOT VMT_II VMT_IX VMT_XI VMT_TOT Subarea 2 431,663.39 448,352.33 448,352.33 1,328,368.05 1,231,524.01 4,419,159.25 4,432,368.45 10,083,051.70 City of Roseville 3 35,070.58 155,064.26 155,064.26 345,199.10 63,267.88 1,174,309.33 1,182,572.68 2,420,149.89 Infill 4 1,174.70 19,034.55 19,034.55 39,243.80 432.63 130,215.33 131,497.25 262,145.21 Downtown 5 98.21 4,875.97 4,875.97 9,850.15 9.82 33,461.64 33,429.67 66,901.13 Riverside Gateway 6 11,983.58 85,837.34 85,837.34 183,658.26 9,727.71 683,858.37 686,737.38 1,380,323.46 Northeast Roseville 7 6,721.66 47,662.96 47,662.96 102,047.58 8,268.68 299,215.80 299,199.92 606,684.40 Northwest Roseville 8 325.74 8,018.65 8,018.65 16,363.04 332.49 49,589.74 49,499.93 99,422.16 Del Webb 9 11,012.68 78,024.80 78,024.80 167,062.28 12,565.68 633,016.89 627,874.45 1,273,457.02 North Industrial 10 20,142.77 104,769.73 104,769.73 229,682.23 21,554.66 810,933.60 816,821.36 1,649,309.62 North Central Roseville 11 2,397.31 30,734.78 30,734.78 63,866.87 1,574.12 205,688.18 206,093.25 413,355.55 Highland Reserve North 12 914.88 17,291.99 17,291.99 35,498.86 898.16 110,607.76 111,159.62 222,665.54 Stoneridge 13 3,321.48 32,673.14 32,673.14 68,667.76 3,081.31 233,609.03 235,581.23 472,271.57 Southeast Roseville 14 2,024.10 29,534.24 29,534.24 61,092.58 2,527.06 173,870.59 173,329.47 349,727.12 North Roseville 15 9,446.24 51,354.69 51,354.69 112,155.62 12,905.28 336,419.11 335,477.54 684,801.93 West Roseville 16 18,314.12 59,239.35 59,239.35 136,792.82 21,167.34 422,688.14 421,844.78 865,700.26 Sierra Vista 17 3,399.12 17,358.64 17,358.64 38,116.40 1,825.49 121,191.75 121,207.75 244,224.99 Amoruso Ranch 18 760.70 11,432.76 11,432.76 23,626.22 428.73 71,440.96 70,999.14 142,868.83 Creekview Total VMT by Plan Area - Proposed Project Amendment
Appendix B – Intersec�on LOS Calcula�ons
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Roseville Soccer Complex 6: Westbrook Blvd & Pleasant Grove Blvd Cumulative Plus Project Weekday PM Peak Hour - Improvements Roseville Soccer Complex Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 85 360 40 60 520 524 20 1020 80 502 1427 103 Future Volume (veh/h) 85 360 40 60 520 524 20 1020 80 502 1427 103 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 85 360 40 60 520 524 20 1020 80 502 1427 103 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 280 734 327 251 704 791 53 1111 345 536 2547 791 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.22 0.22 0.30 0.50 0.50 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 85 360 40 60 520 524 20 1020 80 502 1427 103 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 9.0 2.1 1.7 13.9 20.0 1.1 19.7 4.2 27.7 19.6 3.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 9.0 2.1 1.7 13.9 20.0 1.1 19.7 4.2 27.7 19.6 3.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 280 734 327 251 704 791 53 1111 345 536 2547 791 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.49 0.12 0.24 0.74 0.66 0.38 0.92 0.23 0.94 0.56 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 685 734 327 685 704 791 353 1113 346 759 2547 791 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.7 35.3 32.6 44.2 38.0 18.9 48.0 38.6 32.5 34.3 17.6 13.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 1.3 0.4 0.2 5.2 3.0 1.6 12.5 0.8 12.8 0.9 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 4.0 0.8 0.7 6.5 9.4 0.5 9.4 1.7 13.6 7.6 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.9 36.6 33.0 44.3 43.2 21.9 49.7 51.1 33.4 47.1 18.5 13.9 LnGrp LOS DDCDDCDDCDBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 485 1104 1120 2032
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.6 33.2 49.8 25.3
Approach LOS DCDC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.4 27.7 11.3 26.5 7.0 56.0 12.2 25.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 43.0 22.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 29.7 21.7 3.7 11.0 3.1 21.6 4.3 22.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.2 0.1 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.2
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Westbrook Blvd & Pleasant Grove Blvd
SVSP Campus Oaks
Cumulative Weekday PM Peak Hour - Improvements
SVSP Campus Oaks Sensitivity Test - proposed project + WB31 with 293 DU Synchro 11 Report Fehr & Peers 07/18/2023
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 85 360 40 60 510 525 20 1025 80 505 1425 95 Future Volume (veh/h) 85 360 40 60 510 525 20 1025 80 505 1425 95 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 85 360 40 60 510 525 20 1025 80 505 1425 95 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 279 732 326 250 702 793 53 1109 344 539 2554 793 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.22 0.22 0.30 0.50 0.50 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 85 360 40 60 510 525 20 1025 80 505 1425 95 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 9.1 2.1 1.7 13.6 20.0 1.1 19.9 4.2 27.9 19.6 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 9.1 2.1 1.7 13.6 20.0 1.1 19.9 4.2 27.9 19.6 3.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 279 732 326 250 702 793 53 1109 344 539 2554 793 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.49 0.12 0.24 0.73 0.66 0.38 0.92 0.23 0.94 0.56 0.12 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 683 732 326 683 702 793 352 1110 345 757 2554 793 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.8 35.5 32.7 44.3 38.0 18.9 48.2 38.8 32.6 34.3 17.5 13.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 1.3 0.4 0.2 4.9 3.0 1.6 13.2 0.8 13.1 0.9 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 4.0 0.8 0.7 6.3 9.4 0.5 9.5 1.7 13.7 7.6 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.1 36.8 33.1 44.5 42.9 21.9 49.8 52.0 33.5 47.4 18.4 13.8 LnGrp LOS DDCDDCDDCDBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 485 1095 1125 2025
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.7 32.9 50.6 25.4
Approach LOS DCDC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.6 27.7 11.3 26.5 7.0 56.3 12.2 25.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 43.0 22.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 29.9 21.9 3.7 11.1 3.1 21.6 4.3 22.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.1 0.1 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.4
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

Attachment C
(Combined CEQA Document)—General Plan Amendment Water, Sewer and Drainage Demands (MortonPitalo, May 2023)
Civil Engineering  Land Surveying  Land Planning
Memorandum
600 Coolidge Drive, Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
Telephone: (916) 927-2400
Fax: (916) 357-7888
Date: May 8, 2023
To: City of Roseville, Planning Department
Cc: Scott Canel
From: Greg Bardini, P.E.

RE: HPCO Master Plan – General Plan Amendment Water, Sewer and Drainage Demands

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
In 1996, after preparing a project-level Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the City of Roseville approved the Hewlett-Packard Master Plan (1996 HPMP) to guide light industrial development on the approximately 500-acre site. A small amount of land was designated for commercial/retail at the intersections of Blue Oaks Blvd./Woodcreek Oaks Blvd. and Blue Oaks Blvd./Foothills Blvd. At that time, Hewlett-Packard’s existing facilities occupied approximately 200 acres of the project site. Since 1996, additional light industrial/office buildings have been constructed on the eastern half of the project site subject to the 1996 HPMP. In 2001, the City approved a redesignation and rezoning of the commercial/retail parcels to light industrial use.

The proposed changes to the 1996 HPMP as updated in 2001 take the form of the 2015 Hewlett-Packard/Campus Oaks Master Plan (2015 HPCO), which would accommodate residential and commercial development on the western half of the project site. Uses in the 2015 HPCO Master Plan include residential of varying densities, commercial, office, tech/business park, and parks and open space. Other changes in the 2015 HPCO Master Plan include continuation of HP Way up to Blue Oaks Blvd. and extensions of Painted Desert Dr. and Crimson Ridge Dr. on to the project site.

On August 5, 2015, the Roseville City Council approved the 2015 HPCO Master Plan which would construct 948 dwelling units for an anticipated population of 2,475 new residents. The approved 2015 HPCO also included 60,000 square feet of professional office area on 5.53 acres; 170,000 square feet of commercial use on 19.33 acres; 300,000 square feet of tech/business park development on 32.82 acres; 1,200 square feet of light industrial on 129.24 acres; and 71.01 acres of parks, open space, and public Memorandum – Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan

Page 2 ends

Roseville City CouncilSeptember 20, 2023

Roseville City Council
September 20, 2023