Agenda — Roseville City Council, September 20, 2023 (part 8 of 8)

uses. These totals include the entire project site, including the existing buildings on the eastern half of the site.

Pine Island Apartments, LLC is now proposing a General Plan, Rezoning and revisions to the 2016 HPCO Master Plan for the purpose of facilitating the development of 285 high density residential units on the Campus Oaks portion of the Master Plan area. This will result in changing the land use on parcel CO-52 from Tech/Business Park – Light Industrial (T/BP-LI) to High Density Residential (HDR). A summary of the land use changes, and unit transfers are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 – HP Campus Oaks Land Use Changes
Large Lot
Parcel
Existing Proposed
Land
Use
Area
(Acres)
Dwelling
Units Land Use
Area
(Acres)
Dwelling
Units
CO-52 T/BP-LI 17.65 N/A HDR 17.65 285
Water Demand
According to the City of Roseville 2022 Design Standards Section 8-6, an Average Day Unit Water Demand Factor (ADUWDF) of 2,598 gallons per day per acre (gpd/ac) is used for Business Professional and Light Industrial land uses. This demand factor assumes a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.30.

We have reviewed the water demands for the proposed project against that of the 2016 HPCO Master Plan. Table 2 is the 2022 City of Roseville water demand rates for various land use categories. We applied the water demand rates to parcel CO-52. Table 3 summarizes the water supply in 2016 HPCO and the proposed 2022 General Plan Amendment.

Memorandum – Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan

Page 3 ends

Table 2 – City of Roseville Water Supply Design Standard *Factors assume a 30%F.A.R.
gpd/ DU = Gallons per day per dwelling unit
gpd / AC -Gallons per day per acre
Table 3 – Water Demand Comparison for Large Lot Parcel CO-52 between 2016 HPCO Master Plan & 2023 General Plan Amendment
Water
Demand
Design
Requirements
Land
Use
Area
(Acres)
Dwelling
Units
Water
Demand
Rates
Average Daily
Water
Demands
(gpd)
Maximum
Daily Water
Demands
(mgd) 2x ADF
Annual
Demand
(AFY)
2016 HPCO T/BPLI 17.65 - 2,598
(gpd/ac) 45,855 0.092 51.4
2023 GPA HDR 17.65 285 177 (gpd/DU)
(1) 50,445 0.101 56.5
Change +5.1
(1) HDR > 16.0 DU/Acre
The required water for the CO-52 parcels under the proposed 2022 General Plan Amendment would be approximately 5 acre-feet per year greater than the 2016 HPCO projected development. The 2016 HPCO Water Supply Assessment showed that the Campus Oaks Amendment resulted in a total reduction of 196.93 AFY from the 1996 Memorandum – Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan

Page 4 ends

HPMP. The additional 5.1 AFY should not be a significant impact to the City Roseville Water Supply.

Sewer Demand
Based on the proposed land use changes for parcel CO-52, the average dry weather flow (ADWF) was computed based on the sewer generation rates presented in Table 4 below.

Per conversations with the City of Roseville, the flow factor rate for the Business Professional land use designation is calculated at 850 gpd per acre.

Table 4 – Sewer Generation Rates
1) City of Roseville Design Standards 2022-Average Dry Weather Unit Flow Factors 2) Includes allowances for dry season groundwater infiltration (GWI) 3) Future development projects should use the factor that results in the highest flow.

We have reviewed the sewer demands for the proposed 2022 General Plan Amendment against that of the 2016 HPCO Master Plan. We applied these demand rates to the 2016 HPCO parcel CO-52 in the 2016 HPCO and the proposed 2022 General Plan Amendment revised land use. The summary is shown in Table 5.

Memorandum – Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan

Page 5 ends

Table 5 – Sewer Demand Comparison between 2016 HPCO & 2023 General Plan Amendment Sewer
Demand
Design
Requirements
Land
Use
Area
(Acres)
Dwelling
Units
Sewer
Flow
Factor
Average
Dry
Weather
Flow
(ADWF)
(gpd)
Factored
Flow
(mgd)
2x ADWF
Peaking
Factor
(1)
Peak
Wet
Weather
Flow
(PWWF)
(mgd)
2016 HPCO T/BPLI 17.65 - 850
(gpd/ac) 15,003 0.030 3.5 0.105
2022 GPA HDR 17.65 285 130
(gpd/DU) 37,050 0.074 3.3 0.244
Change +0.139
(1) Peaking Factor per Figure SS-1 in 2022 City Sewer Design Standards Based on the calculation, the peak wet weather flow (PWWF) increases by 0.139 mgd due to the land use change from T/BP-LI to HDR. There is an existing 42” sewer trunk line within Woodcreek Oaks Blvd that has sufficient capacity to receive additional flows. The existing Campus Oaks sewer collection system has been reviewed and there is sufficient capacity within the Painted Dessert and Crimson Ridge sewer pipelines to convey the project flows to Woodcreek Oaks Blvd. (Refer to Appendix A). All collection pipelines operate within the City of Roseville Design standards except for the 10-inch line within Painted Dessert Drive. The allowable depth of flow for a 10-inch pipe is 70% depth or 7 inches. The resulting depth of flow in this pipe segment is 7.08 inches which will not adversely affect the pipeline and within standard engineering tolerances.

Recycled Water Use
The proposed project assumes utilization of recycled water provided by the City of Roseville for irrigating non-residential landscaping, as well as publicly landscaped areas (including roadway landscape corridors and medians) (Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan, Amended August 17, 2016). Based on Table 4 in the HewlettPackard/Campus Oaks Master Plan Recycled Water Systems Master Plan, completed by Municipal Consulting Group, dated January 2015, the recycled water demand (based on the use of smart timers) for High Density Residential and Business Professional land uses is as follows:

High Density Residential 1.76 AFY/acre (7.74 AFY/4.39 Irrigated Acres) Business Professional 1.48 AFY/acre (25.56 AFY/17.30 Irrigated Acres) The following table compares the recycled water demand from the 2016 HPCO to the 2022 GPA.

Memorandum – Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan

Page 6 ends

Table 6 – Recycled Water Demand Comparison between 2016 HPCO & 2023 General Plan Amendment
Recycled Water
Demand Design
Requirements
Land
Use
Area
(Acres)
Recycled Water Demand
Based on Land Use
(AFY/acre)
Recycled
Water Demand
(AFY)
2016 HPCO T/BP-LI 17.65 1.48 26.12
2022 GPA HDR 17.65 1.76 31.06
Change +4.94
Based on the calculation, the recycled water demand increases by 4.94 AFY due to the land use change from T/BP-LI to HDR.

Drainage Flows
The proposed change to the land use of CO-52 from Tech/Business Park-Light Industrial to High Density Residential should reduce the runoff generated from the project. This is because the proposed land use has a lower percent impervious than the existing land use.

According to the HPCO Master Plan Drainage Report (Table 6. Summary of Percent of Pervious Area and Infiltration Rates for Land Uses), High Density Residential land uses are approximately 65% impervious, while Tech/Business Park-Light Industrial land uses are approximately 85% impervious. A 20% reduction in impervious area will reduce the design flows, therefore, by changing the land use of CO-52 from Tech/Business Park-Light Industrial to High Density Residential the Hewlett-Packard/Campus Oaks Master Plan Drainage Report, dated May 4, 2016, is still valid.

Table 7 (below) and Attachment “A”, Post-Development Site Overall Drainage Shed Map, from the Drainage Report shows the drainage flows generated from the project and that they do not exceed those shown on the North Roseville Specific Plan Area (NRSPA) Phase 1 Drainage Shed Map (December 1997) as required by the City of Roseville.

Table 7 Comparison between NRSPA and HPCO Master Plan flow rates (1) Outfall
Location
NRSPA
10-Year
Flow (cfs)
HPCO
Master
Plan 10-
Year Flow
(cfs)
Difference

NRSPA &
HPCO
Master
Plan 10-
Year (cfs)
NRSPA
100-
Year
Flow
(cfs)
HPCO
Master
Plan 100-
Year
Flow (cfs)
Difference

NRSPA &
HPCO
Master Plan
100-Year
(cfs)
1 185.3 167.4 -17.9 304.7 270.7 -34.0
2 62.0 45.9 -16.1 99.3 34.3 -65.0
3 19.3 1.4 -17.9 31.0 2.0 -29.0
(1) This is Table 3b in the HPCO Master Plan Drainage Report

Memorandum – Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan

Page 7 ends

Solid Waste
In 2015 Municipal Consulting Group, LLP completed a Solid Waste Generation and Impact Analysis on Western Placer Waste Management Facilities as it relates to the HewlettPackard Campus Oaks Master Plan. The analysis found that under current conditions, the Western Regional Sanitary Landfill (WRSL) has a projected useful life of 2058 and the waste generated from the HPCO Master Plan will not reduce the life of the landfill because the Master Plan is an infill project included in the current 2025 General Plan.

The original Tech/Business Park – Light Industrial land use used in projecting build of the landfill and MRF resulted in a higher volume / tonnage for the project site. Implementation of the 2015 HPCO Master Plan will reduce the impact of the City’s buildout estimate on the operation capacity of the MRF and reduce the amount disposed of at the WRSL.

On December8, 2022, the Western Placer Waste Management Authority Board of Director certified the Renewable Placer Waste Action Plan EIR and selected and approved Plan Concept 2, the implementation of which will result in the landfill capacity life being extended from 2058 to 2110. Impacts to both the WRSL and the MRF because of the proposed conversion of light industrial to high density residential land use will also not reduce the life of the landfill or operational capacity of the MRF.

Traffic
The proposed change to the land use from Tech/Business Park – Light Industrial to Hight Density Residential (Townhome) would result in a reduction of 13 AM Peak Hour Trips.

Additionally, the land use change would result in 2 additional PM Peak Hour trips resulting in less than one-half of one percent of the plan area PM trips.

Table 8 Comparison between 2016 HPMP and 2023 GPA – Traffic Generation Traffic
Generation
Land
Use
Area
(Acres)
AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips
2016 HPCO1 T/BP-LI 17.65 138 146
2022 GPA HDR 17.65 125 148
Change -13 +2
(1) HPCO Master Plan 2nd Addendum, Appendix A – Traffic

Memorandum – Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan

Page 8 ends

Electric
The proposed change to the land use from Tech/Business Park – Light Industrial to Hight Density Residential would result in a reduction of 0.39 megawatts (MW) of electrical demand.

Table 9 Comparison between 2016 HPMP and 2023 GPA – Electric Demand Electrical
Allocation
Land
Use
Area
(Acres)
Electric Demand
(MW)
2016 HPCO1 T/BP-LI 17.65 1.39
2022 GPA HDR 17.65 1.00
Change -0.39

Memorandum – Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan

Page 9 ends

APPENDIX ‘A’

SEWER ATTACHMENTS

SEWER DESIGN CALCULATIONS
HP - Campus Oaks
May 28, 2015, Revised May 9, 2023
Pipe Contributing ADWF PWWF
Segment Shed Units Rate Flow Units Rate Flow Area Rate Flow Area Rate Flow (gpd/unit) (gpd) (gpd/unit) (gpd) (ac) (gpd/ac) (gpd) (ac) (gpd/ac) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) S1 2,3,4 190 0 0 130 0 1.79 850 1,522 2.15 660 1,419 2,941 156,185 159,125 2.0 318,250 2.67 849,728 S2 5,6 190 0 114 130 14,820 1.19 850 1,012 660 0 15,832 140,353 156,185 2.0 312,369 2.67 834,025 S3 11,12,13a,13b 190 0 150 130 19,500 131.67 850 111,920 660 0 131,420 0 131,420 2.0 262,839 2.78 730,692 S4 7,8,9,10 190 0 130 0 10.51 850 8,934 660 0 8,934 0 8,934 2.0 17,867 3.51 62,713 S5 14,15,16 228 190 43,320 130 0 850 0 660 0 43,320 54,210 97,530 2.0 195,060 2.96 577,378 S6 17,18,19,20,21 0 190 0 417 130 54,210 850 0 660 0 54,210 0 54,210 2.0 108,420 3.25 352,365 S7 22,23,24 126 190 23,940 130 0 850 0 660 0 23,940 69,088 93,028 2.0 186,055 2.94 547,002 S8 25,26 72 190 13,680 130 0 850 0 660 0 13,680 0 13,680 2.0 27,360 3.50 95,760 S9 27,28 100 190 19,000 62 130 8,060 850 0 660 0 27,060 0 27,060 2.0 54,120 3.39 183,467 S10 29 190 0 130 0 33.35 850 28,348 661 0 28,348 0 28,348 2.0 56,695 3.39 192,196 S11 1 190 0 130 0 14.01 850 11,909 661 0 11,909 0 11,909 2.0 23,817 3.59 85,503 Low/Med-Density Residential High-Density Residential Commercial Core/Industrial Public/Quasi-Public Contributing Land Use
Contributing
Shed Flow
Contributing
Pipe Flow
Safety
Factor
Factored
Flow
Peaking
Factor

SEWER PIPE DESIGN PARAMETERS
HP - Campus Oaks
May 28, 2015, Revised May 9, 2023
Pipe PWWF PWWF Max Capacity Extra Capacity Length
Segment Diameter Slope Upstream Downstream
(gpd) (cfs) (in) (ft/ft) (in) (in) gpd gpd ft ft ft
SS-01 849,728 1.315 12 0.0020 1.00 12.00 8.40 1,029,600 179,873 370 82.76 82.02 SS-02 834,025 1.290 10 0.0050 0.70 7.00 7.08 990,155 156,130 705 86.39 82.86 SS-03 730,692 1.131 10 0.0050 0.70 7.00 6.64 990,155 259,463 1,025 91.61 86.49 SS-04 62,713 0.097 8 0.0050 0.70 5.60 1.92 559,063 496,350 535 89.16 86.49 SS-05 577,378 0.893 10 0.0025 0.70 7.00 6.96 699,960 122,582 370 94.86 87.46 SS-06 352,365 0.545 8 0.0057 0.70 5.60 4.56 493,600 141,235 1,065 101.00 94.96 SS-07 547,002 0.846 10 0.0025 0.70 7.00 6.72 592,765 45,763 1,015 87.74 85.20 SS-08 95,760 0.148 8 0.0035 0.70 5.60 2.52 386,830 291,070 380 89.23 87.90 SS-09 183,467 0.284 8 0.0035 0.70 5.60 3.60 386,830 203,363 365 89.18 87.90 SS-10 192,196 0.297 10 0.0035 0.70 7.00 3.36 995,133 802,937 950 91.07 87.74 SS-11 85,503 0.132 12 0.0021 1.00 12.00 1.56 1,055,173 969,670 14 83.55 83.52 Notes:

1. Pipe S1 is oversized to match existing 12" stubs at the connection points at Woodcreek Oaks Blvd and pipe availability.

Proposed Pipe Depth
Ratio
Allowable
Depth of
Flow
Calculated Invert Elevation
Depth of Flow
Attachment D
(Combined CEQA Document)—List of Applicable Mitigation Measures D-1

ATTACHMENT D

Parties: Applicant Monitoring Work Program:

Review building design plans, including proposed surface treatments Standards of success: Reflective portions of building (e.g. large glass or light colored surfaces) are oriented in manner to avoid glare on nearby roadways and gathering spaces.

Prior to approval of design review
Roseville Planning Division
None
Air Quality COMP EIR MM 4.10-1: Provide dust controls. In order to reduce construction-generated PM10 emissions, the contractor shall comply with the dust control strategies developed by the Placer Parties: Contractor Monitoring Work Program: The Applicant shall require its contractor to control dust During construction Applicant and Public
Works Department
Dust Control Plan and proof of submittal to Placer County D-2

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
County APCD. The developer shall include in construction contracts the following requirements or measures shown to be equally effective: a) The contractor shall water as indicated by City inspectors to keep all earth surfaces moist during clearing, grading, earthmoving and other site preparation activities. b) The contractor shall use tarpaulins or other
effective covers for haul trucks that travel on public streets. c) The contractor shall sweep streets within
and adjacent to the project as needed or as directed by City inspectors. d) The contractor shall schedule clearing,
grading and earthmoving activities during periods of low wind speeds, and restrict those construction activities during high wind conditions with wind speeds greater than 20 mph average during an hour. e) The contractor shall control construction and
site vehicle speed to 15 mph on unpaved roads.
watering or ceasing grading activities when wind velocity exceeds 10 miles per hour. The City through the grading permit has enforcing authority to be used in the event construction dust is not controlled. Standards of success: This measure will be deemed successful if constructionrelated PM10 emissions are left at a less-than-significant level.

Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD)
D-3

ATTACHMENT D

COMP EIR MM 4.10-2(a): Maintain construction equipment and vehicles. The developer shall reduce NOx, ROG and CO emissions by complying with the construction vehicle air pollutant control strategies developed by the Placer County APCD. The Developer shall include in construction contracts and in notes on grading plans the following requirements or measures shown to be equally effective: a) Construction equipment operators shall shut off equipment when not in use to avoid
Parties: Developer, Applicant, City Inspector Monitoring Work Program: The Developer shall provide to the City a written statement that construction equipment has been properly maintained and that construction is proceeding as specified. The City Inspector shall periodically inspect operations at the site to Prior to the issuance of grading permits, and periodically throughout construction.

Roseville Public Works Department - Land Development and Transportation Division None
D-4

ATTACHMENT D

COMP EIR MM 4.10-2(b): Develop and implement a Construction Employee Trip Reduction Plan. Consistent with the City's TSM ordinance, the construction contractor shall develop and implement a trip reduction plan designed to reduce construction-phase employee vehicle trips. Elements of this plan could include the following:
 Providing all construction employees with
Parties: Applicant, Contractor Monitoring Work Program: The Applicant will develop and implement a construction trip reduction plan including a method to measure its success. Standards of success: This measure will be deemed During construction Applicant and
Applicant's contractor
None
D-5

ATTACHMENT D

Biological Resources COMP EIR MM 4.5-5: Develop and implement construction protocols. The Master Plan shall include policies that require the implementation of construction protocols that include, but may not be limited to, the following:
 Restrict construction activities to areas away
from preserved oak and riparian habitat
 Provide for construction parking away from
sensitive habitat resources
 Erect temporary barrier fencing to delimit
protected areas.

Parties: Applicant's Biologist, Contractor Monitoring Work Program: The Developer shall incorporate restricted zones into grading/improvement plans and tree permit exhibits submitted to the Public Works Department, all workers, and CDFG. The Public Works Department should perform visual inspections Incorporate measures into grading/improvement plans and tree permit exhibits, and identify the extent of construction. Orient construction workers and erect temporary fencing prior to first day of construction. Visual inspections once a Roseville Planning Division/Public Works
None
D-6

ATTACHMENT D

Standards of success: Roseville Public Works Department approves plans and observes that construction and parking are not occurring in preservation areas. week.

D-7

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
COMP EIR MM 4.5-7: Conduct pre-construction survey and implement restrictions. To ensure that fully-protected raptor species are not injured or disturbed, the developer shall implement one of the three following measures:
a) All tree removal shall occur between August
30 and March 15 to avoid the breeding season of any raptor species that could be using the area. This period may be modified with the authorization of the DFG. -orb) Prior to the beginning of construction during
the period between March 15 to August 30, all trees within 350 feet of any grading or earthmoving activity shall be surveyed for active raptor nests by a qualified biologist. If active raptor nests are found, a fence shall be erected around the tree at a distance of 350 feet from the edge of the canopy to prevent construction disturbance and intrusions on the nest area. -orc) The Applicant shall confer with CDFG and
Parties: Developer's biologist Monitoring Work Program: Either all tree removal shall be conducted between August 30 and March 15, or the Applicant shall contract with a qualified biologist to survey for raptor nests prior to each phase. Data will be recorded by survey personnel concerning:

1. date which preconstruction surveys are
initiated, performed, and completed,

2. survey methods and
objectives,

3. complete species list, 4. results of surveys, and 5. mitigation and timing to prevent next
Prior to issuance of tree permit, tree removal or grading permits for construction within 350 feet of trees; prior to site disturbance and during the appropriate season.

Roseville Planning Division
Surveys, if applicable
D-8

ATTACHMENT D

The developer shall relocate any raptor nest according to CDFG protocol, or in consultation with CDFG, to the nearest suitable nest tree. disturbance.

If nests are found, the City shall:

1. require that construction
activities avoid active nests,

2. monitor nest activity,
and

3. provide a buffer zone of
350' between March 15 and August 30.

Standards of success: Preconstruction surveys performed prior to construction activities in each phase and, if active nest(s) are found, a qualified biologist monitors nest(s) while construction activities are in the vicinity to ensure that buffer zones are established and active nest(s) disturbance is D-9

ATTACHMENT D

Cultural Resources COMP EIR MM 4.6-1: Cease work and consult a qualified archaeologist. In the event of the discovery of buried archaeological deposits it is recommended that project activities in the vicinity of the find should be temporarily halted and a qualified archaeologist consulted to assess the resource and provide proper management recommendations. Possible management recommendations for important resources could include resource avoidance or data recovery excavations.

Parties: Applicant, Contractor Monitoring Work Program: The Applicant must notify the City and consult with a qualified archaeologist if archaeological deposits are discovered before construction activity in the vicinity resumes. Standards of success: This measure will be deemed successful if, in the event of an archaeological discovery, construction is temporarily halted, the Planning and Engineering Divisions are notified, a qualified archaeologist is consulted, recommendations are implemented, and purpose During construction activities
Roseville Planning Division/Engineering Division, Applicant/Contractor None
D-10

ATTACHMENT D

COMP EIR 5th Addendum Parcel CO-52 MM CUL-1 (applicable only for future development on Parcel CO-52):
a) In the event a potentially significant cultural
resource is encountered during subsurface earthwork activities, all construction activities within a 100-foot radius of the find shall cease and workers should avoid altering the materials until an Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology has evaluated the find. The project applicant shall include a standard inadvertent discovery clause in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of, but are not limited to, stone, bone, glass, ceramics, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts, or features including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. The Archaeologist shall assess whether the find to determine whether it This condition shall be reflected in all construction and building plans, and construction site workers shall be advised by the site manager of this measure.

Prior to and during construction activities
Roseville Building and Engineering Division
None
D-11

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
archaeological nature shall follow the applicable requirements and limitations set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Data recovery will normally consist of (but would not be limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, site documentation, and historical research, with the aim of recovering important scientific data contained within the unique archaeological resource or historical resource of an archaeological nature. The data recovery plan shall include provisions for analysis of data in a regional context, reporting of results within a timely manner, curation of artifacts and data at an approved facility, and dissemination of reports to local and State repositories, libraries, and interested professionals. If data recovery is determined by the CDSD to not be appropriate, then an equally effective treatment shall be proposed and implemented. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction within the project site shall be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms and shall D-14

ATTACHMENT D

COMP EIR 5th Addendum Parcel CO-52 MM CUL-2 (applicable only for future development on Parcel CO-52): In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 shall be followed. If, during the course of project construction, there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following This condition shall be reflected in all construction and building plans, and construction site workers shall be advised by the site manager of this measure.

Prior to and during construction activities
Roseville Building and Engineering Division
None
D-15

ATTACHMENT D

1. There shall be no further excavation or
disturbance within 100 feet of the remains until the County Coroner is contacted to determine whether the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native American. The MLD may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work within 48 hours, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98.

2. Where the following conditions occur, the
landowner/applicant or his or her authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated
D-16

ATTACHMENT D

Energy COMP EIR MM 4.10-2(a): Maintain construction equipment and vehicles.

See above.

COMP EIR MM 4.10-2(b): Develop and implement a Construction Employee Trip Reduction Plan.

See above.

D-17

ATTACHMENT D

Parties: Applicant, Contractor Monitoring Work Program: The Public Works Department shall review the results of a geotechnical investigation performed by the Applicant or Applicant's consultant. The review will verify that all required components have been included, and that the findings of the investigation have been incorporated into the final plans, prior to commencement of any earthwork on the property. Standards of success: This measure will be deemed successful when an adequate geotechnical investigation, as specified, is performed and Prior to approval of any improvement plans for the Proposed Project.

Public Works Department - Engineering Division
Results of geotechnical evaluation
D-18

ATTACHMENT D

COMP EIR MM 4.6-1: Cease work and consult a qualified archaeologist.

See above
COMP EIR 1st Addendum MM 5-1: Paleontological mitigation program. Prior to earthmoving activities associated with mass grading, a qualified supervising paleontologist shall be contracted to conduct a field survey of the proposed construction area to identify areas of likely sensitivity for paleontological resources. The supervising paleontologist shall also conduct construction crew training in identification of paleontological resources that may be discovered during the course of excavation. The paleontologist will also conduct paleontological monitoring during ground disturbing activities in areas identified through survey and archival review as sensitive for paleontological resources. In the event of discovery of vertebrate, plant, or invertebrate This condition shall be reflected in all construction and building plans, and construction site workers shall be advised by the site manager of this measure.

Prior to and during construction activities
Roseville Engineering Division
None
D-19

ATTACHMENT D

Parties: Applicant, Contractor Monitoring Work Program: The Public Works Department shall review the Applicant's plan for on-site detention facilities. The plan will identify the specific locations, capacity, and feasibility of the detention basins. The design of the detention basins shall meet the City's requirements and shall be designed to maintain post-development Prior to approval of a building permit for development in the north watershed, south watershed or a grading permit and any improvement plans.

Public Works Department
None
D-20

ATTACHMENT D

COMP EIR MM 4.4-2(b): Contribute fair share fees to regional flood control facilities. The Proposed Project must construct on-site drainage facilities to the City's satisfaction to limit the project's contribution to increased flows and contribute its fair share in mitigation fees to the City's regional flood control projects.

Parties: Applicant Monitoring Work Program: The fee will be collected at the time a building permit is issued within the Master Plan area. Standards of success: Applicant pays fee for regional flood control, in amount determined by the City.

The Applicant must agree to pay the fees prior to approval of Development Agreement. Fees must be paid concurrent with issuance of building permits.

Public Works - Engineering
None
COMP EIR MM 4.4-4: Implement erosion control plan.

Parties: Applicant, Contractor
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, or approval of
Public Works - Engineering
Erosion and sedimentation
D-21

ATTACHMENT D

Monitoring Work Program: The Public Works Department shall review the Grading Plan developed by the Applicant or Applicant's consultant and pursuant to the Improvement Standards. The review will verify that all required components have been included and that the findings of the plan have been incorporated into the final plans prior to commencement of any earth work on the property. Standards of success: The measure will be deemed successful when the Improvement Standards have been met as determined by the City and runoff from the site into natural drainage is not significant. improvement plans. control plan
D-22

ATTACHMENT D

Discuss during preconstruction meeting and comply with the measure.

During construction activities
Roseville Engineering Division
None
COMP EIR 1st Addendum MM 12-1(b): Provide information at construction sites. Construction contractors shall post signs at construction sites that include information on permitted construction days and hours, a day and evening contact number for the job site, and a contact number in the event of problems. An onsite complaint and enforcement manager shall respond to and track complaints and questions related to noise.

Discuss during preconstruction meeting and comply with the measure.

During construction activities
Roseville Engineering Division
None
COMP EIR 1st Addendum MM 12-1(c): Measures for construction within 800 feet of a residence.

Discuss during preconstruction meeting and comply with the measure.

During construction activities
Roseville Engineering Division
None
D-23

ATTACHMENT D

COMP EIR 1st Addendum MM 12-2(a): Acoustical review of rooftop mechanical equipment near residential uses. Prior to issuance of a building permit for uses within 300 feet of existing or planned residential uses, a qualified acoustical consultant shall review the final specifications of proposed rooftop mechanical equipment to confirm that operational noise levels would not exceed 60 dBA Ldn/CNEL at exterior project residential uses and would not exceed 45 dBA Ldn/CNEL inside the residences.

Project plans will be reviewed for compliance.

Prior to issuance of building permits
Roseville Building Division
An acoustical study
D-25

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
Tribal Cultural Resources Parcel CO-52 MM TCR-1: Unanticipated discoveries. The following mitigation measure is intended to address the evaluation and treatment of inadvertent/unanticipated discoveries of potential Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) during a project’s ground disturbing activities. a) If any suspected TCRs are discovered
during ground disturbing construction activities, all work shall cease within 100 feet of the find, or an agreed upon distance based on the project area and nature of the find. A Tribal Representative from a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with a geographic area shall be immediately notified and shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC §21074). The Tribal Representative will make written recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary. b) When avoidance is infeasible, preservation
This condition shall be reflected in all construction and building plans, and construction site workers shall be advised by the site manager of this measure.

Prior to and during construction activities
Roseville Building and Engineering Division
None
D-26

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
in place is the preferred option for mitigation of TCRs under CEQA and UAIC protocols, and every effort shall be made to preserve the resources in place, including through project redesign, if feasible. Culturally appropriate treatment may be, but is not limited to, processing materials for reburial, minimizing handling of cultural objects, leaving objects in place within the landscape, or returning objects to a location within the project area where they will not be subject to future impacts. Permanent curation of TCRs will not take place unless approved in writing by UAIC or by the California Native American Tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area. c) The contractor shall implement any
measures deemed by the CEQA lead agency to be necessary and feasible to preserve in place, avoid, or minimize impacts to the resource, including, but not limited to, facilitating the appropriate tribal treatment of the find, as necessary. The City will consult with the tribe(s) and implement appropriate treatment measures. Preservation in place is the preferred treatment, if feasible. Work D-27

ATTACHMENT D

Utilities and Service Systems COMP EIR MM 4.4-2(a): Identify adequate detention facilities locations.

See above
SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR MITGATION MEASURES and OTHER(S) for the PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN / SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS Aesthetics SVSP EIR MM 4.14-1(a): Site lighting to minimize nuisance.Light producing uses, such as for ball field within The City shall implement policies to reduce the nuisance effects of Prior to issuance of building permits
The Parks and Recreation Director shall review the
None
D-28

ATTACHMENT D

Air Quality SVSP EIR MM 4.4-1: Dust and construction control measures. In accordance with the PCAPCD, the applicant shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations (e.g., Rule 202, 218 and 228). In addition, at the time of tentative map the applicant(s) shall implement a minimum of five (5) of the following measures unless superseded by state or other more stringent standards: The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce short-term constructionrelated air quality impacts. In addition, dust control measures are required to be implemented by all projects in accordance with The applicants shall submit construction management plans as part of the Grading Permit application. The Public Works Director shall review grading plans for inclusion of these measures prior to issuance of grading permits. The City Code Enforcement Officer shall respond to complaints.

Prior to issuance of grading permits
Director of Public Works shall ensure that dust control measures are implemented Dust Control Plan and proof of submittal to PCAPCD
D-29

ATTACHMENT D

The following measures are also included to reduce construction-related ROG, Nox, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions:
 All construction equipment shall be
D-31

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
maintained in good operating condition. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per the manufacturer’s specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for verification. This measure will reduce combustion emissions of all criteria air pollutants.  Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,
all applicants shall submit construction plans denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction will be used, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Low emission equipment is defined as meeting the California Air Resources Board’s Tier III standards. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the PCAPCD as well as City Planning Staff. This measure will primarily reduce ROG, Nox, PM10, and PM2.5 exhaust emissions.  Paints and coating shall be applied either by
D-32

ATTACHMENT D

The City of Roseville is currently working with the Placer County Pollution Control District to update the standard mitigation measures. The following measures will likely be required at the time specific development is proposed. 1a. Prior to approval of Grading/ plans the applicant shall submit a Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan to the Placer County APCD. The plan must be submitted by certified mail, or receive a date stamp or other submittal proof. This plan must address the minimum Administrative Requirements found in section 300 and 400 of APCD Rule 228, Fugitive Dust. The applicant shall not break ground prior to receiving APCD approval of the Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan. If the applicant has submittal proof of submittal and no D-36

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
response is received from the District within 20 working days the plan shall be deemed complete, and construction may begin. 1b. Include the following standard note on the
Improvement/Grading Plan: The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e. make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower of greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. If any new equipment is added after submission of the inventory, the prime contractor shall the prime contractor shall contact the APCD prior to the new equipment being utilized. At least three business days prior to the use of subject heavy-duty off-road equipment, the project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, and name and phone number of the property owner, project manager, and on-site foreman. 1c. Prior to approval of Grading/Improvement
Plans, the applicant shall provide a plan to
D-37

ATTACHMENT D

2. Include the following standard note on the
Improvement/Grading Plan: If required by the Public Works Department, the contractor shall hold a pre-construction meeting prior to grading activities. The contractor shall invite the Placer County APCD to the preconstruction meeting in order to discuss the construction emission/dust control plan with employees and/or contractors.

3. Prior to building permit approval, the
D-38

ATTACHMENT D

4. Prior to building permit approval, the
applicant shall show, on the plans submitted to the Building Department, provisions for construction of new residences, and where natural gas is available, the installation of a gas outlet for use with outdoor cooking appliances, such as a gas barbecue or outdoor recreational fire pits.

5. Prior to building permit approval, in
accordance with District Rule 225, only U.S. EPA Phase II certified wood burning devices shall be allowed in single-family residences. The emission potential from each residence shall not exceed a cumulative total of 7.5 grams per hour for all devices. Masonry fireplaces shall have either an EPA certified Phase II wood burning device or shall be a U.L. Listed Decorative Gas Appliance. (Rule D-39

ATTACHMENT D

6. Wood burning or Pellet appliances shall not
be permitted in multi-family developments. Only natural gas or propane fired fireplace appliances are permitted. These appliances shall be clearly delineated on the Floor Plans submitted in conjunction with the Building Permit application. (Rule 225/section 302.2)

7. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit,
the applicant shall show that all flat roofs with parapets shall include a white or silver cap sheet to reduce energy demands.

8. Diesel trucks shall be prohibited from idling
more than five minutes. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall show that all truck loading and unloading docks shall be equipped with one 110/208 volt power outlet for every two dock doors. Diesel Trucks idling for more than five minutes shall be required to connect to the 110/208 volt power to run any auxiliary equipment. 2’x3’ signage which indicates “Diesel engine Idling Limited to a Maximum of 5 Minutes” shall be shown on the building elevations and shall be submitted to the D-40

ATTACHMENT D

9. Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, an
enforcement plan shall be established, and submitted to the APCD for review, in order to evaluate project-related on-and-off- road heavy-duty vehicle engine emission opacities on a weekly basis, using standards as defined in California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Sections 2180 – 2194. An Environmental Coordinator, hired by the prime contractor or property owner, and who is CARB-certified to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations (VEE), shall routinely evaluate project related off-road and heavy duty on-road equipment emissions for compliance with this requirement. Operators of vehicles and equipment found to exceed opacity limits will be notified by APCD and the equipment must be repaired within 72 hours. (California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Sections 2180 – 2194) PCAPCD Rules (Existing District requirements to be added as construction notes or referenced in conditions of approval) D-41

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
New Standard Condition of Approval (for all projects): The project shall comply with all applicable Placer County Air Pollution Control District rules and regulations, and shall obtain applicable permits and/or clearances from the District prior to the start of construction. The following air quality notes shall be added to the grading and/or improvement plans:
 The contractor shall use CARB ultra low
sulfur diesel fuel for all diesel–powered equipment. In addition, low sulfur fuel shall be utilized for all stationary equipment. (California Standards for Motor Vehicle Diesel Fuel, title 13, article 4.8, chapter 9, California Code of Regulations).  Processes that discharge 2 pounds per day
or more of air contaminants, as defined by Health and Safety Code Section 39013, to the atmosphere may require a permit. Permits are required for both construction and operation. Developers/contractors should contact the District prior to construction and obtain any necessary permits prior to the issuance of a Building D-42

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
minutes for all diesel powered equipment.
 During construction, traffic speeds on all
unpaved surfaces shall be limited to 15 miles per hour or less. (Rule 228/section 401.2) SVSP EIR WMM 4.4-3: Measures to reduce operational emissions. Following receipt of an application for a Tentative Maps (excluding the large lot subdivision map) or Design Review Permit for individual projects with the Specific Plan, the City will forward an early consultation notice to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD). Where the PCAPCD provides comments on a specific development proposal, the City shall consult with PCAPCD and the developer to incorporate measures recommended by the PCAPCD and City into the project. Where the PCAPCD does not provide comment on a specific development proposal, the City shall incorporate measures that reduce vehicle emissions and operation emissions from the proposed development. This measure will be implemented through project design, conditions of approval, noticing and disclosure statements, The Applicants shall provide this information as general notes on the grading plans. The Public Works Director shall review plans for inclusion of this measure prior to issuance of building permits. The City Code Enforcement Officer shall respond to complaints.

Prior to issuance of grading permits
The Public Works Director and Code Enforcement Officer shall ensure that the dust control measures are implemented.

Required plans and proof of submittal to PCAPCD
D-44

ATTACHMENT D

Measures for Detached Single-Family Residences:
 Require electrical outlets be installed on the
exterior walls of both the front and back of residences to promote the use of electric landscape maintenance equipment.  Require installation of a gas outlet in the rear
of residential buildings for use of outdoor cooking appliances, such as gas burning barbeques.  Require installation of low nitrogen oxide
(NOx) hot water heaters (beyond District Rule 246 requirements)  Provide notice to homebuyers of incentive
and rebate programs available through Roseville Electric or other providers that D-47

ATTACHMENT D

Where propane or natural gas service is not available, only EPA Phase II certified woodburning devices shall be allowed in singlefamily residences. The emission potential from each residence shall not exceed 7.5 grams per hour. Wood-burning or Pellet appliances shall not be permitted in multifamily developments.

SVSP EIR WMM 4.4-7: Risk assessment and site specific measures. Users that could generate toxic air contaminants will be required to submit a Permit to Operate to the PCAPCD. The District will review the use and if a proposed project would cause the combined emissions of TACs to exceed the risk standard of ten in one million at residences or public uses (schools, parks, etc.), additional modeling and/or environmental review would be required to demonstrate emissions from that use or other uses would be reduced so that the standard is not exceeded. For example, an The applicant shall submit a Permit to Operate to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District during the design review process.

Applicants shall obtain a permit to operate from the PCAPCD, as needed, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

The Placer County Air Pollution Control District shall review proposals and notify the Planning Director should a proposed use exceed the TAC threshold. The Planning Director and Environmental Coordinator shall determine if additional environmental review is required prior to Copy of Permit to Operate, if applicable
D-48

ATTACHMENT D

Biological Resources SVSP EIR MM 4.8-2: Relocate western spadefoots. The location of pools that are occupied by western spadefoot shall be determined through surveys conducted during the appropriate season (generally February), by a qualified biologist. Those pools that are found to support western spadefoot shall be avoided if feasible. If avoidance is not feasible, then the CDFG shall be consulted for its recommendation with respect to an adult or larval or egg masses capture and relocation plan. Although there is no set protocol for this type of activity, the capture and relocation of reptile and amphibian species from areas that will be destroyed to areas of unoccupied suitable habitat is a fairly standard part of both USFWS and CDFG procedures and The applicants shall obtain appropriate permits from the Corps and USFWS to ensure that there is no net loss of wetlands. The Applicants shall prepare annual reports on the status and success of mitigation and shall submit these responses to USFWS. The Applicants shall coordinate with USFWS to modify as necessary any mitigation plans in an effort to attain mitigation success.

Prior to issuance of grading permit
The City’s Environmental Coordinator shall ensure that onsite wetlands are preserved and maintained consistent with the Operations and Maintenance Plan.

Results of surveys and copy of permits from the Corps and USFWS D-49

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
recommendations for mitigating impacts. When done in combination with habitat restoration and preservation, the procedure is known to be successful in preserving displaced populations. These measures would mandate that, where habitat avoidance is infeasible, western spadefoots displaced from pools that are destroyed during construction shall be relocated to protected areas of suitable habitat. SVSP EIR MM 4.8-3: Avoid nesting sites. To ensure that fully protected bird and raptor species are not injured or disturbed by construction in the vicinity of nesting habitat, the project applicant shall implement the following measures: Raptors a) When feasible, all tree removal shall occur between August 30th and February 15th to avoid the breeding season of any raptor species that could be using the area, and to discourage hawks from nesting in the vicinity of an upcoming construction area. b) For Swainson’s hawk, if avoidance of tree
Results of preconstruction surveys shall be submitted to the Chief Building Inspector prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Applicable construction restrictions shall be reflected within building plans. The applicants shall prepare annual reports on the status and success of mitigation and shall submit these reports to USFWS and CDFG. The applicants shall coordinate with USFWS and Prior to approval of grading and building permits.

The Chief Building Inspector shall ensure that appropriate measures are reflected in the grading permit and/or building plans. The Building Official shall ensure that construction contractors comply with the measures. The Code Enforcement Inspector shall enforce the City’s Preconstruction surveys, if applicable
D-50

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
removal outside the breeding season is not feasible, and a nest is present, the applicants would be required to obtain a 2081 permit from CDFG to mitigate for potential “take” under CESA. If no nesting is occurring, a take permit would not be required. c) Prior to the beginning of mass grading,
including grading for major infrastructure improvements, during the period between February 15th and August 30th, all trees and potential burrowing owl habitat within 350 feet of any grading or earthmoving activity shall be surveyed for active raptor nests or burrows by a qualified biologist no more than 30-days prior to disturbance. If active raptor nests or burrows are found, and the site is within 350-feet of potential construction activity, a highly visible temporary fence shall be erected around the tree or burrow(s) at a distance of up to 350-feet, depending on the species, from the edge of the canopy to prevent construction disturbance and intrusions on the nest area. d) Preconstruction and non-breeding season
CDFG to modify as necessary any mitigation plans in an effort to attain mitigation success. regulations. The Environmental Coordinator shall oversee open space areas for compliance with the Operations and Maintenance Plan.

D-51

ATTACHMENT D

Black Rails and Tri-colored Blackbirds Prior to earth moving that would disturb marsh habitat, a qualified biologist shall conduct surveys to determine the presence of the California black rail. If either of these species is found, all earth moving within 250 feet shall stop and measures, including establishing nest protection buffers along both sides of Curry Creek during the nesting season (generally February 1 through August 31st) shall be implemented. Rookeries No heron rookeries are present within the plan area. Prior to earthmoving that would disturb marsh habitat or tree removal of the eucalyptus grove, pre-construction surveys should be conducted to verify that no rookeries have been established. If rookeries are present all earth moving within 250-feet shall stop, during the breeding season.

D-53

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
SVSP EIR MM 4.8-4: Off-site and on-site preservation of grassland habitat. Swainson’s Hawk CDFG recommends that projects that result in the loss of potential foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk (which includes grasslands) within 10-miles of an active nest site provide mitigation for that loss. To the extent feasible, strategies for preserving on-site grasslands as raptor and migratory bird foraging habitat will be addressed in the Operations and Maintenance Plan prepared pursuant to the Section 404 Permit. Some of these strategies could include; but are not necessarily limited to, grazing for grassland management, monitoring for biological values, and adaptive management. Mitigation for Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat would concurrently mitigate for loss of habitat for a number of other wildlife species in the region such as burrowing owl, red-tailed hawk, whitetailed kite, northern harrier, Ferruginous hawk, and logger-head shrike among others. Based on information obtained through consultation with CDFG and otherwise, a Appropriate environmental review and appropriate permits shall be conducted and obtained in accordance with applicable rules and regulations governing the protection of listed species.

Prior to issuance of grading permit
The City’s Environmental Coordinator shall ensure that grassland habitats are preserved and maintained consistent with the Operations and Maintenance Plan.

Operations and Maintenance Plan prepared pursuant to Section 404 permit, if applicable D-54

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
Swainson’s Hawk Grassland Habitat Mitigation Plan shall be developed to mitigate for the loss of grassland foraging habitat, consistent with the ratios set forth in Table 4.8-7 in the SVSP EIR. Areas within Placer County including the Toad Hill Mitigation Bank, the Western Placer Schools Mitigation Area and a portion of Koshman Ranch and other sites that will be located within Placer County via conservation easements or other mechanisms would provide a total of 1,036 upland/grassland acres. This would reduce the impacts to Swainson’s Hawk to a less than significant level. Long-billed Curlew, Burrowing Owls Mitigation for the Swainson’s hawk would ensure that adequate grassland is preserved at ratios identified in Table 4.8-7 in the SVSP EIR. For foraging within one mile of an active nest, mitigation would be 1:1. Greater than a mile would be at an amount of .75:1. This would set aside adequate grassland that would reduce impacts from loss of grasslands to these species to a less than significant level. SVSP EIR MM 4.8-7: Off-site surveys. Appropriate biological Prior to issuance of The Director of Public Biological D-55

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
Prior to construction of any off-site infrastructure, a qualified biologist shall perform detailed, and if necessary, focused biological surveys of any undisturbed areas that would be affected by infrastructure development. Because infrastructure for the proposed project would be located in road right-of-way, or undeveloped land similar to the project site, the biological resources that would be expected to occur would not differ substantially from those identified in the SVSP EIR. If it is determined that wetland resources or sensitive species would be impacted MM 4.8-1 and MM 4.8-2 shall be implemented, as appropriate to the resource. If it is determined that active nests exist within the off-site improvement location, MM 4.8-3 shall be implemented as appropriate to the species. If it is determined the off-site improvement is located within or adjacent to a wildlife movement corridor, MM 4.8-5 shall be implemented. surveys, environmental review, and appropriate permits shall be conducted in accordance with applicable rules and regulations governing the protection of listed species. grading permit Works and the
Environmental Coordinator shall ensure that the appropriate environmental review and permits are obtained and measures implemented to reduce impacts associated with offsite infrastructure. surveys, if applicable
Cultural Resources SVSP EIR MM 4.9-1: Cease work and consult with a qualified archaeologist.

This condition shall be reflected in all construction
Prior to issuance of grading permit and/
The Public Works Director will ensure
None
D-56

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
Should any cultural resources, such as structural features, any amount of bone or shell, artifacts, human remains, or architectural remains, be encountered during any subsurface development activities, work shall be suspended within 100-feet of the find. The City of Roseville Planning and Public Works Staff shall be immediately notified. At that time, the City of Roseville shall coordinate any necessary investigation of the site with qualified archaeologists as needed, to assess the resource (i.e., whether it is an “historical resource” or a “unique archaeological resource”) and provide proper management recommendations should potential impacts to the resources be found to be significant. Possible management recommendations for important resources could include resource avoidance or, where avoidance is infeasible in light of project design or layout or is unnecessary to avoid significant effects, data recovery excavations. The contractor shall implement any measures deemed feasible and necessary by City staff, in consultation with the archaeologists, to be to avoid or minimize significant effects to the cultural resources. In and building plans. The Public Works Director shall review plans for inclusion and permits of specifications prior to the issuance of building permits. or approval of improvement plans.
that appropriate measures are reflected in the grading permit and/or building improvement plans. The Building Official shall ensure that construction contractors comply with the measures. The Code Enforcement Inspector shall enforce the City’s regulations.

D-57

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
addition, pursuant to Section 5097.98 or the State Public Resources Code, and Section 7050.5 of the State Health and Safety Code, in the event of the discovery of human remains, the County Coroner shall be immediately notified. If the remains are determined to be Native American, guidelines of the Native American Heritage Commission shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. SVSP EIR MM 4.9-5: Conduct appropriate offsite studies. Prior to undertaking construction of off-site infrastructure, the City shall determine whether or not cultural resource surveys have been undertaken for any areas to be disturbed during construction. If surveys were conducted, the City shall document that any identified resources were treated as recommended in the studies. If no studies or surveys were conducted, the City shall ensure that a qualified archaeologist conducts the appropriate level of study. If resources are found, recommendations shall be implemented to ensure that the resources are avoided, protected and/or recorded, as Cultural resource surveys shall be conducted by a qualified archaeologist and any resulting recommendations to protect resources shall be reflected in all construction and building plans. The Public Works Director shall review plans for inclusion of specifications prior to the issuance of building permits.

During construction, as a condition of Grading and Building Permits.

The Public Works Director shall ensure that appropriate measures are reflected in the grading permit and/or building plans. The Building Official shall ensure that construction contractors comply with the measures. The Code Enforcement Inspector shall None
D-58

ATTACHMENT D

Energy SVSP EIR MM 4.4-1: Dust and construction control measures.

See above.

SVSP EIR WMM 4.4-3: Measures to reduce operational emissions.

See above.

D-59

ATTACHMENT D

The applicant shall submit construction management plans as part of the Grading Permit application. The Public Works Director shall review grading plans for inclusion of these measures prior to issuance of grading permits. The City Code Enforcement Officer shall respond to complaints. In addition, plans will be reviewed by the Placer County Air Pollution Control District for compliance with their rules and regulations.

Prior to issuance of Grading Permits.

Director of Public Works shall ensure that dust and construction-control measures are implemented.

None
Geology and Soils SVSP EIR MM 4.9-3: Cease work until review is conducted by a qualified paleontologist and This condition shall be reflected in all construction
During construction, as a condition of
The Public Works Director will ensure
None
D-60

ATTACHMENT D

Grading and Building Permits.
that appropriate measures are reflected in the grading permit and/or building plans. The Building Official shall ensure that construction contractors comply with the measures. The Code Enforcement Inspector shall enforce the City’s regulations.

Greenhouse Gases SVSP EIR MM 4.4-1: Dust and construction control measures.

See above.

SVSP EIR MM 4.5-2: Additional measures to See above.

D-61

ATTACHMENT D

The applicants shall be responsible for conducting soil testing and/or recommendation of the Phase I environmental site assessments.

Prior to issuance of building permits
The Roseville Fire Department shall oversee any activities related to hazardous materials.

Phase I environmental assessment, if conditions warrant D-62

ATTACHMENT D

The City shall collect the Pleasant Grove Drainage fee from applicants.

Prior to the issuance of Building Permits
The Public Works Director shall monitor and ensure that the Pleasant Grove drainage fee is collected.

None
SVSP EIR MM 4.13-1: Implement construction activity stormwater protection standards. Prior to the issuance of a City grading permit and the commencement of construction activities, compliance with the State’s General Construction permit, the City of Roseville’s Construction Standards, and the City’s Stormwater BMP Guidance Manual will be met. This includes the creation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that will This condition shall be reflected in all construction and building plans. The Public Works Director shall review plans for inclusion of specifications prior to the issuance of building permits.

Prior to issuance of grading or building permits.

ATTACHMENT D

Land Use and Planning SVSP EIR MM 4.6-1: Construction noise reduction. MM 4.6-1(a): Construction activities shall comply with the requirements of the City of Roseville Noise Ordinance. MM4.6-1(b): Locate fixed construction equipment such as compressors and generators as far as possible from sensitive receptors. Shroud or shield all impact tools, and muffle or shield all in-take and exhaust ports on power construction equipment. MM 4.6-1(c): Designate a construction disturbance coordinator and conspicuously post These measures shall be included on building plans. The Chief Building Inspector shall review plans for inclusion of these measures prior to issuance of building permits. The Code Enforcement Inspector shall respond to complaints.

Prior to approval of grading permits and/or building permits.

The Chief Building Inspector shall ensure that appropriate noise control measures are reflected in the building plans. The Building Official shall ensure that construction contractors comply with the measures. The Code Enforcement Inspector shall None
D-64

ATTACHMENT D

Noise SVSP EIR MM 4.6-1: Construction noise reduction.

See above
SVSP EIR MM 4.6-4: Traffic noise attenuation. Applicants shall submit sitespecific acoustical analyses Prior to issuance of The Chief Building Inspector shall ensure An acoustical study, if D-65

ATTACHMENT D

APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES
from the HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN EIR and SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR and Associated Addenda
And
New Measure(s) Included as Part of the Proposed Project Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents
to be
Submitted to
the City
Staff Use
Only
MM 4.6-4(a): Masonry walls and/or landscaped berms shall be constructed along the major project-area roadways adjacent to proposed residential uses if acoustical studies warrant sound attenuation, otherwise standard wood fencing is acceptable. Draft EIR Table 4.6-10 data shall be consulted to determine appropriate barrier heights. If the assumptions shown in Table 4.6-10 vary considerably, a detailed analysis of exterior and interior mitigation measures should be conducted when tentative maps become available. MM 4.6-4(b): In areas requiring sound attenuation, noise barrier walls shall be constructed of concrete panels, concrete masonry units, earthen berms, or any combination of these materials. Wood is not recommended for construction due to eventual warping and degradation of acoustical performance. MM 4.6-4(c): Tentative map applications for residential uses located along Fiddyment Road would be required to include an analysis of interior noise levels. The report shall be conducted by a qualified acoustical engineer to the Chief Building Inspector for review.
building permits. that appropriate noise
control measures are reflected in the building plans. The Building Official shall ensure that construction contractors comply with the measures. The Code Enforcement Inspector shall enforce the City’s Noise Ordinance regulations. conditions or plans deviate from Specific Plan or EIR.

D-66

ATTACHMENT D

Applicants shall submit sitespecific acoustical analyses to the Chief Building Inspector for review.

Prior to issuance of building permits.

An acoustical study, if conditions or plans deviate from Specific Plan or EIR.

Public Services SVSP EIR MM 4.11.3-2: Safe routes to school. The applicants shall work with the school Prior to building permits being issued within the
Prior to issuance of building permits
The Planning Director and Public Works
None
D-67

ATTACHMENT D

SVSP, school transportation policies should be developed in coordination with appropriate school district.

Director shall ensure that student transportation issues are addressed in coordination with the appropriate school district.

Tribal Cultural Resources SVSP EIR MM 4.9-1: Cease work and consult with a qualified archaeologist.

See above.

SVSP EIR MM 4.9-5: Conduct appropriate offsite studies. See above. Utilities and Service Systems SVSP EIR WMM 4.11-5: Wastewater treatment plant capacity. Prior to obtaining building permits for development that would cause total wastewater flows from SVSP to contribute to total flows at the PGWWTP exceeding 75 percent utilization of treatment plant capacity (General Plan Policy The applicants shall demonstrate that the PGWWTP shall be expanded.

Prior to issuance of building permit that would cause total wastewater flows to exceed 75 percent utilization of treatment plant The Environmental Utilities Director shall monitor the capacity of the PGWWTP and ensure that expansion occurs in advance of the need.

None
D-68

ATTACHMENT D

SVSP EIR MM 4.12.4-2: Divert construction debris. The applicants shall ensure a 50% reduction in the construction waste stream generated from development within the SVSP. In Developer contracts with construction contractors and their sub-contractors, the Developer shall require that construction waste be reduced by 50%. The Developer shall further require that contractors and sub-contractors submit records of diversion Applicants and contractors shall keep and submit records demonstrating 50% reduction in construction waste.

At the time of construction, debris will be diverted to an appropriate recycling facility The Environmental Utilities Director shall ensure that the Applicants are complying with the construction debris diversion requirements.

Records of diversion
D-69

ATTACHMENT D

RESOLUTION NO.23-388

AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ON

CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a proposal has been submitted to amend the General Plan 2035 – Land Use Map of the City of Roseville for that portion of certain real property within the City of Roseville known as Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan Parcel CO-52 from Tech Park/Business Professional – Light Industrial (T/BP LI) to High Density Residential (HDR) and Sierra Vista Specific Plan Parcel WB-52 from Parks and Recreation (PR) to High Density Residential (HDR), as shown in Exhibits C and D, attached and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the General Plan on August 24, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing at which time the proposed amendments were considered; and
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2023, the City Council considered the 5 th Addendum to the
Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #95112022, certified on June 5, 1996) and considered the 12
th Addendum to the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR
(SCH #2008032115, certified May 5, 2010); and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Roseville desires to approve said amendments to the Roseville General Plan as conducive to public interest, health, safety and welfare, and consistent with the land use practices of the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the amendment changing the Land Use Map (attached as Exhibit E) is hereby adopted.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Development Services Director is hereby directed to retain said General Plan Amendments on permanent public display in the Development Services Department of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________________________
MAYOR
____________________________
City Clerk
PAINTED DESERT DR.

Existing Land
Use: CC
T/BP
APN 481-260-036

17.61 ± AC ROSEVILLE PKWY
Existing Land
Use: CC
Existing Land
Use: HDR
Existing Land
Use: HDR
Existing Land
Use: T/BP
Existing Land
Use: LI
Existing Land
Use: LI
BLUE OAKS BL.

CRIMSON RIDGE WAY
Existing Land
Use: P/QP
PAINTED DESERT DR.

Existing Land
Use: CC
HDR

17.61 ± AC
APN 481-260-036 ROSEVILLE PKWY
Existing Land
Use: CC
Existing Land
Use: HDR
Existing Land
Use: HDR
Existing Land
Use: T/BP
Existing Land
Use: LI
Existing Land
Use: LI
BLUE OAKS BL.

CRIMSON RIDGE WAY
Existing Land
Use: P/QP
Dwg: X:\2022\22-0001-00 (CAMPUS OAKS CO-52)\DWG\PLAN\EXHIBITS\220001-P01-GPA.DWG | Saved: 04-12-22 02:30pm SBRYSON ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 481-260-036
EXISTING LAND USE: T/BP - TECH/BUSINESS PARK
PROPOSED LAND USE: HDR - HIGH-DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL
SITE AREA: 17.61 ± ACRES

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN
web: www.mpengr.com
600 Coolidge Drive, Suite #140
Folsom, CA 95630
phone: (916) 984-7621
Fresno
*
Folsom

GRAPHIC SCALE
1 in = 400 ft
0200400 400 800
@ 17" X 11" SHEET SIZE

HEWLETT-PACKARD ROSEVILLE

CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR CO-52
APRIL 12, 2022 VICINITY MAP
SITE

AREA OF

AMENDMENT

AREA OF

AMENDMENT

CC EXHIBIT C
PLEASANT GROVE BLVD.

SANTUCCI BLVD. PLEASANT GROVE BLVD.

SANTUCCI BLVD. Dwg: X:\2021\21-0100-00 (WESTBROOK 30)\DWG\PLAN\EXHIBITS\DA\WB_DA_BASE-GPA.DWG | Saved: 07-26-23 04:13pm GBARDINI ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 496-100-028 EXISTING LAND USE: PR - PARK PROPOSED LAND USE: HDR - HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SITE AREA: 1.5 ± ACRES EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 600 Coolidge Drive, Suite 140 s Folsom, CA 95630 phone: 916.984.7621 s fax: 916.984.9617 s survey fax: 916.563.6770 survey email: [email protected] s web: www.mpengr.com GRAPHIC SCALE 1 in = 400 ft 0200400 400 800 @ 17" X 11" SHEET SIZE SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR WB-52 AUGUST 15, 2023 VICINITY MAP SITE AREA OF AMENDMENT AREA OF AMENDMENT Existing Land Use: OS Existing Land Use: HDR Existing Land Use: HDR Existing Land Use: HDR Existing Land Use: MDR Existing Land Use: LDR PR (PARK) 1.5± AC. APN 496-100-028 Existing Land Use: OS Existing Land Use: HDR Existing Land Use: HDR Existing Land Use: HDR Existing Land Use: MDR Existing Land Use: LDR HDR 1.5± AC. APN 496-100-028 CITY LIMITS CC EXHIBIT D Page II-9

LAND USE
Roseville General Plan
Figure II-2 | Land Use Map

JUNCTION BL
TAYL
C
O
C
R RD

BLUE OAKS BL
WAS
L
H
D
IN
R

GTON BL

ROSEVILLE PW

SECRETRAVINE PW

EUREKA RD

ROCKY RIDGE DR

GA RIA BLLE L
VER
D
NON ST
FIDDY
C
MEN
L
T
D
RD

WOODCREEK OAKS BL
S CIR
DR
BY WY

RIVERSIDE AV
I
ATLA
C
NTI
L
C ST

DOUGLAS BL

CIRBY WY

PLEASANT GROVE BL

BASELINE RD

HARDING BL

WESTBROOK BL
E ROSE
P

VILLE PW

AIRWAY DR

N SUNR ISE AV
!"c$
A¤MDR
MDR
MDR
HDR
HDR
HDR OS
CC/VC
HDR/VC
LDR
MDR/VC
HDR
MDR
OS
LDR
P/QP
CC
CC

P/QP P/QP
LDR
HDR
LDR
OS
CC
PR
LDR
LDR
OS
LDR
PR
LDR
LDR

MDR P/QP
LDR
LDR
MDR

LDR LDR LDR
MDR
MDR
HDR
MDR
MDR
LDR
LDR
PR
HDR
LDR
LDR
P/QP
HDR
CC
MDR
LDR
OS

P/QP PR OS

PR OS OS
OS
CC
OS
OS
CC
MDR

MDR MDR
OS OS
MDR
OS
OS MDR
OS
OS
LDR
P/QP
UR
OS
CC
OS
MDR
OS

LDR HDR
CC
LDR
LDR
HDR

LDR LDR
OS
P/QP

P/QP/VC
CC/VC
HDR/VC
PR/VC
MDR/VC
CC
OS
HDR
CC
HDR
LDR OS
HDR
LDR
PR
LDR
LDR
PR
LDR
LDR
OS
C
MDR
HDR
PR
LDR
HDR
LDRPR
P/QP
PR
LDR
LDR
P/QP
LDR
LDR
LDR
P/QP
PR
LDR
LDR
OS
LDR
HDR
CC

CC/BP LDR
PR
MDR
OS
LDR
OS
LDR
OS
PR
CC
LDR

P/QP CC
LDR
OS HDR
CC
IND CC
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
PR
MDR
LDR
OS
PR
RC
CC

P/QP P/QP BPP/QP
CC/BP
PR
HDR
OS/FP
CC
LDR
OS
PR

LDR LDR OS/FP PR
LDR
CC

LDR LDR
HDR
LDR
LI

P/QP CC
LDR
PR
LDR
LI
LDR
LDR
HDR
PR
CC
P/QP
LI
LDR
LDR
HDR
LDR CC
LDR
PR
PR
CC

LDR LDR
LDR
LDR
PR
P/QP
CC PR
PR

LDR LDR
CC
CC
PR
LDR
CC
LDR
LDR
RC
PR
PR
LDR
LDR

P/QP LDR LDR
PR
PR
RC
P/QP
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
RC
LDR
OS LDR
BP/CC
PR

BP/CC PR

LDR LDR
HDR
OS
PR
CC
PR
HDR
LDR
PR
PR
OS
P/QP
LDR
HDR
LDR
OS
OS

MDR HDR CC
BP
PR
OS
LDR
HDR
HDR
CC LDR
LDR
P/QP
LDR
LDR
MDR
MDR
LDR
PR
PR
PR
HDR
PR
PR
OS/FP
LDR
LDR
LDR
RC
OS
LDR
LDR
HDR
BP LDR
LDR
PR
P/QP
BP CC
CC BP
BP BP
BP
BP
HDR
PR
PR
LDR
LI
LDR OS
LDR
PR
NC LDR
LDR
CC
P/QP
CC
P/QP
LDR
LDR
LDR
CC
OS
LDR
MDR
CC
PR
CC
PR
LI
CC
PR
PR
PR
PR
OS
PR
LDR
PR
LDR
LDR
LDR
CC
PR
LDR
LI
PR
LI
LDR
LDRPR
LDR
OS OS
OS
LI
PR
LDR
P/QP
OS
LDR
LDR
CC

CCBP BP HDR

HDRBPBP
BP
BP
LDR
LDR
PR
LDR
LI
PR
CC
PR
CC
BP
P/QP
PR
PR
HDR

MDR HDR
MDR
LDR
OS
OS
PR LDR
LDR
OS
LDR
LDR
LDR BP
CC
P/QP

LDR LDR BP
HDR
CC
BP

LDR PR MDR
MDR
P/QP
LI
P/QP

LDR LDR
LDR
TS
PR
LI
BP
LDR
LDR

LDR P/QP
P/QP
LDR LI
LDR
LDR

P/QP PR
LDR
BP
LI
P/QP
OS/FP
BP
BP
HDR
LDR
LDR
BP BP
MDR
CC
LI
MDR
MDR
HDR
LDR
LDR
MDRMDR
BP CC
LDR
LDR
HDR
BP
P/QP
LDR
P/QP
LDR
CC
LDR
BP
CC
LDR
BP
LDR
CC
CC H
BP
BP
MDR
LDR
OS
PR
LDR
PR
P/QP
P/QP
L
PR
NC
CC
CC
BP

MDR MDR
CC
CC LDR
CC
OS
CC
LDR
P/QP
CC BP
HDR
CC
LDR
BP
HDR
MDR BP
BP
LDR
LDR
LDR
BP CC
PR
CC
CC
HDR
CC
MDR
LDR
CC
PR
BP
LDR
P/QP
CC
LDR
LDR PR
HDR
LDR
LDR
LDR

LDR LDR
CC
OS LDR
MDR
CC
CC
CC CC
CC
HD
F
R PR
MDR
BP
HDR
CC
HDR
HDR
OS
CC
OS
CC
LDR
BP
OS/FP
HDR
CC
CC
LDR
IND
MDR
BP
CC
PR
IND
OS
LDR
LDR

LDR LDR
LDR
LDR
LI
BP

PR OS/FP
LDR
LDR
CC
OS/FP
LDR
R
OS
BP
LDR
OS
LDR
PR
LI
LI
LDR
LI
LDR
HDR
H
P

P/QP DR
LDR
HDR

MDR LDR
LDR
LDRLDR

HDR LDR
LDR
HDR
LDR
LDR
P/QP
CC
CC
LDR

LDR LDR
PR
LDR
PR
LDR
PR
LDR
PR
PR LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
OS
LDR
LDR
CC
LDR
PR
MDR
HDR
P/QP
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
OS
LDR
MDR
BP
P/QP
LDR
LDR
PR
PR
LDR
LDR
LI
LDR PR
OS
OS
LDR
OS
CC
OS
CC
BP
MDR
HDR
LDR
CC
CC
BP/CC
OS/FP
LDR
LDR
OS
LDR
CC
CC
HDR
LI
LDR
LDR
LDR
PR
MDR
LI
OS
LDR
CC HDR
LDR
LDR
B
LDR
LDR
PR
OS
OS
LDR
LDR
P/QP
LDR
PR
CC
LDR
OS
LDR
PR
NC LDR
MDR
OS/FP
LDR
LDR
LDR
CC
BP
BP
OS
OS
BP
BP
BP
CC
HDR
CC
CC
MDR

LDR LDR
CC/FP
CC
LDR
LDR
OS
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
P/QP

OS/PR/FP
LDR
OS/FP
LDR
LDR
MDR
PR
CC
MDR
MDR

OS/FP OS/FP
LDR
LDR
MDR
CC
PR
OS
LI
OS
IN
CC
LDR
OS/FP
LDR
LDR
LDR
PR
CBD
CC CC
MDR
CBD
CC
CC
BP/LI
IND
DR
IND
LDR
MDR
LDR
LDR
OS/
L
P
D
R
R
/FP
LDR
CC
OS
LDR
LDR
OS
LDR
LDR
OS
PR

OS LDR LDR LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
PR
OS OS
P/QP
OS/FP
PR
MDR
LDR
BP
CC
LDR
PR
LDR
LDR
PR CC
LI LI

IND IND
PR CC
HDR PR
OSPR
LDR
LDR
LDR

LDRPRP/QP
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR

HDR LDR
OS
LDR
LDR
LDR
MDR
MDR
MDR
PR
LDR
OS
CC
HDR
LDR
LI
CC
CC
BP
T/BP

MDR MDR MDR
LDR
LDR
LDRLDR
PR
LIPR
OS
LI
MDR
PR

P/QP LDR

MDR LDR

LDR LDR

LDR LDR
CC
HDR
MDR

LDR LDR
LDR
MDR
PR
LDR

MDR LDR
MDR
LDR
LDR
MDR
MDR
HDR
HDR
HDR
BP
OS
HDR
LDR
MDR
P
O
R
S
PR
MDR
PR
MDR
LDR
LDR OS
P/QP
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
CC CC
LDR
PRHDR

LDR LDR

LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR
LDR
LDR

MDR P/QP
LDR
MDR
LDR
OS
LDR
LDR
LDR
OS
LDR
R
LDR
HDR
CC
LDR
LDR
LDR
MDR
OS
LDR
LDR
C
CC
HDR
MDR
OS
HDR
MDR
MDR
CC/VC
HDR
CC/VC
M
D
DR
L R
OS
PR
OS
MDR
PR
PR

P/QP L R
L
D
DR
LDR
LDR

LDR LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR

LDR LDR
LD
D
R
L
DR
RLDR
LDR
L
LDRLDR
LDR

LDR LDR
PR
LDR

HDR MDR
LDR
LDR
LDR

LDR LDR
OS
OS
LDR
LDR
LDR

LDR LDR
LDR
MDR
MDR
MDR
MDR
MDR
MDR
MDRMDR
LDR
MDR
LDR
HDR

HDR HDR
LDR
OS
OS
OS
OS
LDR
PR
PR
LDR
CC

P/QP LDR
UR
UR
OS
CC
CC
CC
OS
CC
LDR
LEGEND
Planning Area
Landuse
Residential
Low-Density Residential (LDR)
Medium-Density Residential (MDR)
High-Density Residential (HDR)
Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
Community Commercial (CC)
Regional Commercial (RC)
Office
Business Professional (BP)
Industrial
Light Industrial (LI)
General Industrial (IND)
Tech/Business Park (T/BP)
Transfer Station (TS)
Special Areas
Central Business District (CBD)
Public/Quasi-Public (PQP)
Parks and Recreation (PR)
Open Space (OS)
Urban Reserve (UR)
I 0 2,500 5,000
FEET
Last updated: December 2021
Combining Uses
Floodplain (FP)
Study Area (SA)
Village Center (VC)

CC EXHIBIT E
RESOLUTION NO. 23-389

AMENDING THE SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, a proposal has been submitted to amend the land use designation of Parcel WB-52 of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan from Parks and Recreation (PR) to High Density Residential (HDR); and
WHEREAS, the proposed land use amendment requires a Specific Plan Amendment to change the text and land use map within the Sierra Vista Specific Plan, as shown in Exhibit F, attached and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2023, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council approve the proposed Specific Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan Amendment as proposed and revised is consistent with the adopted City of Roseville General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Roseville has reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission recommending approval of the Specific Plan Amendment, and makes the following findings:

The Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the City of Roseville General Plan and the Sierra Vista Specific Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the proposed changes to the Sierra Vista Specific Plan are adopted as set forth in the attached Exhibit F.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ______ day of ____________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
4-2 City of Roseville
Table 4-1: Plan Area Land Use Summary
Land Use Designation
Applied
Zoning
Districts
Acres % of Total
Acres Units % of Total Units
Residential Neighborhoods
LDR Low Density Residential RS/DS 595.6 28.7% 3,049 34.8% LDR LDR – Age Restricted RS/DS 94.3 4.6% 493 5.6%
MDR Medium Density Residential RS/DS 351.1 16.9% 2,614 29.8% HDR High Density Residential R3 92.0 4.4% 2,367 27.1%
Sub-totals 1,133 54.7% 8,523 97.2%
Commercial and Employment
CC Community Commercial
(Commercial Mixed Use) CMU/SA 29.1 1.4% 249 2.8%
CC/BP Community Commercial/
Business Professional (Mixed
Use)
CC/SA 25.4 1.2% -- --
CC Community Commercial CC & GC 167.2 8.1% -- --
Sub-totals 221.7 10.7% 249 2.8%
Open Space/Public
P/QP Public/Quasi-Public P/QP 64.7 3.1% -- --
PR Parks & Recreation PR 104.6 5.0% -- --
OS Open Space OS 302.0 14.6% -- --
OS Paseo (60’-wide) OS 13.4 0.6% -- --
UR Urban Reserve UR 38.7 1.9% -- --
Sub-totals 523.4 25.3% -- --
Right of Way/ Landscape Corridor 193.82 9.2% -- --
TOTAL 2072.2 ac 100% 8,772 du 100%
Note: See Table 7-4 for net Paseo total acres
Last Updated December 2021

CC EXHIBIT F
City of Roseville 4-3LAND USE PLAN
Figure 4-1: Land Use Map
City of Roseville 4-7LAND USE PLAN
Table 4-2: Land Use, Zoning, & Acreage by Parcel (cont.)

PARCEL GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
(Specific Plan Land Use) ZONING ACRES ALLOCATEDUNITS DENSITY UR-92 Urban Reserve UR 38.72
Sub-totals (Urban Reserve) 38.72 0
WB-1A LDR (Residential – Age-Restricted) RS/DS 30.30 126 4.2 WB-1B LDR (Residential – Age-Restricted) RS/DS 22.20 133 6.0 WB-2A LDR (Residential – Age-Restricted) RS/DS 11.81 58 4.9 WB-2B LDR (Residential – Age-Restricted) RS/DS 7.67 39 5.1 WB-3A LDR (Residential – Age-Restricted) RS/DS 11.10 66 5.9 WB-3B LDR (Residential – Age-Restricted) RS/DS 11.23 71 6.3 WB-4 LDR (Residential) RS/DS 16.50 100 6.1
WB-5 LDR (Residential) RS/DS 30.50 157 5.1
WB-6 LDR (Residential) RS/DS 21.70 103 4.7
WB-7 LDR (Residential) RS/DS 25.14 145 5.8
WB-20 MDR (Residential) RS/DS 8.88 66 7.9
WB-21 MDR (Residential) RS/DS 11.80 81 6.9
WB-22 MDR (Residential) RS/DS 4.80 32 6.7
WB-23 MDR (Residential) RS/DS 9.88 71 7.3
WB-24 MDR (Residential) RS/DS 7.50 53 7.1
WB-25 MDR (Residential) RS/DS 14.30 100 7.0
WB-30 HDR (Residential) R3 8.06 237 29.4
WB-31 HDR (Residential) R3 11.10 293 26.4
WB-32 HDR (Residential) R3 5.11 128 25.0
WB-41 MDR (Residential) RS/DS 8.5 63 7.4
WB-42 CC (Commercial) CC 14.55
WB-50 PR (Park) PR 8.74
WB-51 PR (Park) PR 4.47
WB-52 PR (Park) PR 1.50
WB-60 Public/Quasi-Public (Elementary School) P/QP 10.00 WB-61 Public/Quasi-Public (Well) P/QP 0.31
WB-62 Public/Quasi-Public (Lift Station) P/QP 0.80
WB-80 OS (Open Space) OS 36.58
Sub-totals (Westbrook) 365.64 2,029
ROW Right of Way/Landscape Corridors 193.82
Sub-totals (ROW) 193.82 0
Total 2,072.16 8,772
Table Updated June 2022
(GIS acreages revised January 2021)
5-4 City of Roseville
Allocation of Affordable Housing Goal
The affordable housing units within the SVSP have been allocated to specific MDR and HDR parcels as identified in Table 5-3, with designated parcels reflected on Figure 5-1. The intent is to distribute affordable units throughout the Plan Area. In addition, through implementation of the Affordable Housing Plan, the City should work with property owners to define alternative solutions, such as carriage units or granny flats in LDR and MDR areas, which also meet the intent of the Program.

Table 5-3: Affordable Housing Allocation
Parcel Land
Use
Total
Units in
Parcel
Total
Affordable
Allocation
Very Low
Income
Rental
Low
Income
Rental
Middle2
Income
Purchase
CG-20 MDR 44 20 20
CO-20 MDR 84 34 34
DF-201 MDR 113 23 9 9 5
KT-20 MDR 202 31 31
CG-31 HDR 420 80 40 40
FD-32 HDR 178 43 43
FD-34 HDR 1722565 172256 862566 86
KT-30 HDR 150 124 62 62
JM-304 HDR 176 176 88 88
WB-30 HDR 2373555 23733553 68 1693355
3 WB-32 HDR 1281925 12831923 92 3631923
Total 1,0681,3343 445455 49037463 133
1 Carriage units are intended to fulfill the very-low and low income obligation 2 Middle-income purchase unit obligations may also be fulfilled via additional low-income rental units. 41 middle-income units were converted to lowincome units via the Westbrook SPA approved in 2016.

3. Includes 162 units transferred to Westbrook from WRSP Parcel W-16.

4. Parcel JM-30 includes 8 units (4 Very-Low and 4 Low) transferred from NRSP Parcel M-31 (File #PL17-0204), 5 units transferred from SVSP Parcel JM-40 (File #PL20-0103), and 12 units transferred from SVSP Parcel JM-21 (File #PL20-0191).

5. Total units in parcel is reflective of the density bonus processed with File #PL23- 0064.

6. Very-low income obligation transferred from Parcel WB-30 and WB-32 (File #PL23-0064).

Table 5-2: Affordable Housing Goal
Income Category Units Required to Meet Goal
40% Very-Low-Income 347 du
40% Low-Income 347 du
20% Middle-Income 174 du
Total Affordable Housing Need 868 du (10% of 8,679 du)
City of Roseville 5-5AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN
NOTE: SVSP Section 5.4 allows for the transfer of affordable units. Check with the Housing Division to confirm current affordable housing obligations.

City of Roseville 7-3
P
U
B
L IC
S
E
R
V IC
E
S
Figure 7-1: Parks and Open Space Plan
City of Roseville 7-5
Parks and Open Space Provided
Approximately 423 acres of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan has been designated for citywide parks, neighborhood parks, paseos, and open space Preserves. Specifically, the Plan Area designates approximately 105 acres for citywide and neighborhood parks, 14 acres for paseos, and 304 acres for open space areas. Sierra Vista’s park lands are summarized in Table 7-3 and sited throughout the Plan Area as illustrated on Figure 7-1.

Credited Parks and Open Space
A total of 195.6 acres of credited park land are required within the Plan Area in order to comply with the General Plan’s park land dedication requirements. This includes land for citywide and neighborhood parks, as well as open space.

Each acre set aside for active park use is credited as a full acre towards meeting the General Plan park dedication requirement. Depending on the ultimate use, recreational value, or application of Sierra Vista’s open space parcels, full or partial credit may be granted for open space land containing informal recreational facilities, paseos, open space amenities, or natural features.

Park land credits for each parcel are outlined in Table 7-3, with a cumulative summary summarized in Table 7-4, below. The credits applied are reflective of each parcel’s recreational value as a park or open space amenity.

Table 7-3: Park and Open Space Lands and Credits by Parcel Parcel Type Acreage Credit
Ratio
Credited
Ac.

Citywide Park Facilities
KT-50 Citywide Park 39.95 1:1 39.95
Subtotal 39.95 ac. 39.95 ac.

Neighborhood Parks
CG-50 Neighborhood Park 7.63 1:1 7.63
CO-50 Neighborhood Park 1.00 1:1 1.00
DF-50 Neighborhood Park 1.79 1:1 1.79
FD-50 Neighborhood Park 1.73 1:1 1.73
FD-51 Neighborhood Park 1.07 1:1 1.07
FD-52 Neighborhood Park 5.51 1:1 5.51
FD-53 Neighborhood Park/School 8.15 1:1 8.15
JM-50 Neighborhood Park/School 8.00 1:1 8.00
JM-51 Neighborhood Park 2.62 1:1 2.62
JM-52 Neighborhood Park 1.50 1:1 1.50
KT-51 Neighborhood Park 4.24 1:1 4.24

PUBLIC SERVICES
7-6 City of Roseville
Table 7-3: Park and Open Space Lands and Credits by Parcel Parcel Type Acreage Credit Credited
Ratio Ac.

KT-52 Neighborhood Park/School 7.61 1:1 7.61
WB-50 Neighborhood Park/School 8.7 1:1 8.7
WB-51 Neighborhood Park 4.40 1:1 4.40
WB-52 Neighborhood Park 1.53 1:1 1.53
Subtotal 65.4863.95
ac.

65.4863.95
ac.

Open Space
CG-80 Open Space 1.87 1:5 0.37
CG-81 Open Space 6.83 1:5 1.37
CG-82 Open Space 0.95 1:5 0.19
CO-80 Open Space - powerline 14.18 1:10 1.42
CO-81 Open Space 22.92 1:5 4.58
DF-80 Open Space 21.58 1:5 4.32
DF-81 Open Space 4.71 1:5 0.94
FD-80 Open Space 5.66 1:5 1.13
FD-81 Open Space 5.50 1:5 1.10
FD-82A Open Space - powerline 11.09 1:10 1.11
FD-82B Open Space 0.14 1:5 0.03
FD-83 Open Space 3.50 1:5 0.70
FD-84 Open Space 25.34 1:5 5.07
FD-85 Open Space - powerline 20.80 1:10 2.08
FD-86 Open Space - powerline 1.68 1:10 0.17
FD-87A Open Space 4.10 1:5 0.82
FD-87B Open Space - powerline 0.18 1:10 0.02
FD-88A Open Space 13.17 1:5 2.63
FD-88B Open Space - powerline 20.89 1:10 2.09
JM-80 Open Space 0.63 1:5 0.13
JM-81 Open Space - powerline 6.50 1:10 0.65
JM-82 Open Space - powerline 2.67 1:10 0.27
JM-83 Open Space - powerline 6.25 1:10 0.63
JM-84 Open Space 10.38 1:5 2.08
JM-85 Open Space 15.19 1:5 3.04
KT-80A Open Space 17.91 1:5 3.58
KT-80B Open Space 17.42 1:5 3.48
KT-81 Open Space 4.65 1:5 0.93
WB-80 Open Space 36.58 1:5 7.32
Paseos Open Space – Paseos
(see Table 7-5)

13.96 1.1 6.05
Subtotal 317.23 ac. 58.30 ac.

TOTAL 422.66421.13
ac.
164.03162.5
ac.

City of Roseville 7-7
Table 7-4: Park Credit Summary
Park Type
Credited
Acreage
Required
Total
Acreage
Provided
Credited
Acreage
Received
Surplus/
Shortfall
Citywide 65.2 acres 40.0 acres 40.0 acres -25.2 acres
Neighborhood 65.2 acres 65.564.1
acres

65.264.1
acres
+0.3 -1.1
acres
Open Space
(includes paseos) 65.2 acres 317.2 acres 58.3 acres -6.9 acres Total Requirement 195.6 acres 422.7421.3
acres
163.5162.4
acres
-31.8 -33.2
acres
As illustrated above, Sierra Vista satisfies the City’s neighborhood park land dedication requirements. However, there is a shortfall in the citywide park, neighborhood park, and open space components. The Citywide, neighborhood park and open space land dedication shortfall is to be satisfied via the City’s park in-lieu fee pursuant to General Plan policy.

In addition, paseos are eligible for open space credit. The SVSP includes a paseo design whereby the typical landscape corridors along collector streets (Market Street, Upland Drive, and Federico Drive), are widened by a total width of 26 feet along the collector roadway edge. This additional widened portion of landscape is referred to as paseo and is eligible to receive a 1:1 acre open space parkland credit. A total of 6.05 acres of paseo landscaping will augment the required collector roadway’s typical landscape corridor. Therefore, this portion of the paseo is eligible for a total open space credit of 6.05 acres. The specific design for the collector roadways includes one side of the street with a total landscape & paseo width of 60’, and the other side with a 30’-wide landscape & paseo.

Combined, the total landscape easement and widened paseo component total approximately 13.96 acres as noted in Table 7-3, above.

Table 7-5, below, includes a detailed summary of each paseo parcel and its applied open space credit.

PUBLIC SERVICES
City of Roseville 7-19
P
U
B
LIC
S
E
R
V IC
E
S
Note: This concept plan is subject to change based on funding, environmental conditions, or other factors. Mix of turf and shrub areas to be determined at the time of final design.

Concept Plan for Neighborhood Park Parcel WB-52
ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 5428 OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED

WITHIN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The Council of the City of Roseville has reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission recommending approval of the rezone specified herein, and makes the following findings pursuant to Section 19.86.050 of the Zoning Ordinance:

1. The rezone is in conformance with the public interest, health, safety, or welfare of the City; and

2. The rezone is consistent with the objectives, policies, programs, and land use designations of the City of Roseville General Plan, the Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan, and the Sierra Vista Specific Plan.

SECTION 2. That Section 19.06.020 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Roseville, Ordinance No. 5428, is amended to change the zoning of that portion of certain real property located on Parcel CO52 of the Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan in the City of Roseville, as shown and so designated in Exhibit G, attached and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby rezoned from Industrial/Business Park/Special Area (MP/SA) to Multi-Family Housing (R3); and to change the zoning of that portion of certain real property located on Parcel WB-52 of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan in the City of Roseville, as shown and so designated in Exhibit H, attached and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby rezoned from Parks and Recreation (PR) to Multi-Family Housing (R3).

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication byposting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
PAINTED DESERT DR.

Existing Zoning:

CC
MP/SA
APN 481-260-036

17.61 ± AC ROSEVILLE PKWY
Existing Zoning:

CC
Existing Zoning:

R3/DS
Existing Zoning:

MP/SA
Existing Zoning:

M1/SA
Existing Zoning:

M1/SA
BLUE OAKS BL.

CRIMSON RIDGE WAY
Existing Zoning:

P/QP
PAINTED DESERT DR.

Existing Zoning:

CC
R3/DS

17.61 ± AC
APN 481-260-036 ROSEVILLE PKWY
Existing Zoning:

CC
Existing Zoning:

R3/DS
Existing Zoning:

MP/SA
Existing Zoning:

M1/SA
Existing Zoning:

M1/SA
BLUE OAKS BL.

CRIMSON RIDGE WAY
Existing Zoning:

P/QP
Dwg: X:\2022\22-0001-00 (CAMPUS OAKS CO-52)\DWG\PLAN\EXHIBITS\220001-P01-RZN.DWG | Saved: 08-10-23 09:40am GBARDINI ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 481-260-036
EXISTING ZONING: MP/SA -

INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS PARK / SPECIAL AREA
PROPOSED ZONING: R3/DS - MULTI- FAMILY

HOUSING/DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
SITE AREA: 17.61 ± ACRES

EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING
web: www.mpengr.com
600 Coolidge Drive, Suite #140
Folsom, CA 95630
phone: (916) 984-7621
Fresno
*
Folsom

GRAPHIC SCALE
1 in = 400 ft
0200400 400 800
@ 17" X 11" SHEET SIZE

HEWLETT-PACKARD ROSEVILLE

CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN
REZONE EXHIBIT FOR CO-52
AUGUST 10, 2023 VICINITY MAP
SITE

AREA OF
REZONE

CC EXHIBIT G
PLEASANT GROVE BLVD.

SANTUCCI BLVD. PLEASANT GROVE BLVD.

SANTUCCI BLVD. Dwg: X:\2021\21-0100-00 (WESTBROOK 30)\DWG\PLAN\EXHIBITS\DA\WB_DA_BASE-GPA.DWG | Saved: 08-15-23 08:33am GBARDINI ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 496-100-028 EXISTING ZONING: PR - PARK PROPOSED ZONING: R3 - MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING SITE AREA: 1.5 ± ACRES EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING 600 Coolidge Drive, Suite 140 s Folsom, CA 95630 phone: 916.984.7621 s fax: 916.984.9617 s survey fax: 916.563.6770 survey email: [email protected] s web: www.mpengr.com GRAPHIC SCALE 1 in = 400 ft 0200400 400 800 @ 17" X 11" SHEET SIZE SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN REZONE EXHBIT FOR WB-52 AUGUST 15, 2023 VICINITY MAP SITE AREA OF AMENDMENT AREA OF AMENDMENT Existing Zoning: OS Existing Zoning: R3Existing Zoning: RS/DS PR (PARK) 1.5± AC. APN 496-100-028 Existing Zonng: OS R3 1.5± AC. APN 496-100-028 CITY LIMITS CITY LIMITS Existing Zoning: R3 Existing Zoning: R3 Existing Zoning: RS/DS Existing Zoning: R3Existing Zoning: RS/DS Existing Zoning: R3 Existing Zoning: R3 Existing Zoning: RS/DS CC EXHIBIT H PAINTED DESERT DR.

Existing Land
Use: CC

T/BP-LI
APN 481-260-036

17.61 ± AC ROSEVILLE PKWY
Existing Land
Use: CC
Existing Land
Use: HDR
Existing Land
Use: HDR
Existing Land
Use: T/BP-LI
Existing Land
Use: LI
BLUE OAKS BL.

CRIMSON RIDGE WAY
Existing Land
Use: P/QP
PAINTED DESERT DR.

Existing Land
Use: CC
HDR

17.61 ± AC
APN 481-260-036 ROSEVILLE PKWY
Existing Land
Use: CC
Existing Land
Use: HDR
Existing Land
Use: HDR
Existing Land
Use: T/BP-LI
Existing Land
Use: LI
BLUE OAKS BL.

CRIMSON RIDGE WAY
Existing Land
Use: P/QP
Dwg: X:\2022\22-0001-00 (CAMPUS OAKS CO-52)\DWG\PLAN\EXHIBITS\220001-P01-MPA.DWG | Saved: 04-12-22 02:30pm SBRYSON ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 481-260-036
EXISTING LAND USE: T/BP-LI - TECH/BUSINESS
PARK
PROPOSED LAND USE: HDR - HIGH-DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL
SITE AREA: 17.61 ± ACRES

EXISTING MASTER PLAN PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
web: www.mpengr.com
600 Coolidge Drive, Suite #140
Folsom, CA 95630
phone: (916) 984-7621
Fresno
*
Folsom

GRAPHIC SCALE
1 in = 400 ft
0200400 400 800
@ 17" X 11" SHEET SIZE

HEWLETT-PACKARD ROSEVILLE

CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN
AMENDMENT FOR CO-52
APRIL 12, 2022 VICINITY MAP
SITE

AREA OF
REZONE

CC EXHIBIT I
RESOLUTION NO. 23-390
ADOPTING THE TWO (2) FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING THE MODIFICATION OF A MAJOR PROJECT PERMIT STAGE 1 IN ORDER TO MODIFY THE HEWLETTPACKARD CAMPUS OAKS MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, a proposal for Modification of a Major Project Permit Stage 1 in order to modify the Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan was submitted to the Planning Commission of the City;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed modification of a Major Project Permit Stage 1 on August 24, 2023; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing at which time the proposed modification of a Major Project Permit Stage 1 was considered, including the two (2) findings of fact:

1. The Preliminary Development Plan is consistent with the General Plan, applicable Specific Plan, and adopted City design guidelines; and

2. The design and installation of the Preliminary Development Plan shall not be detrimental to the public health and safety, or be materially detrimental to the public welfare.

WHEREAS, the modification of a Major Project Permit Stage 1 as proposed is consistent with the adopted City of Roseville General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the two (2) Findings of Fact for the Modification of a Major Project Permit Stage 1 and approve the modification; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of this City Council to approve said modification of a Major Project Permit Stage 1 in order to amend the text and figures contained within the HewlettPackard Campus Oaks Master Plan as conducive to the public interest, health, safety or welfare of the City, and consistent with the land use practices of the City; and WHEREAS, the Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan is incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the modification of a Major Project Permit Stage 1 and text and figure changes in the Master Plan are hereby adopted as set forth in the attached Exhibit J.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ______ day of ____________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk

A BLUEPRINT COMMUNITY

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Adopted August 5, 2015
Amended ____________, 2016
An Amendment to the HewlettPackard Roseville Campus
Master Plan

CC EXHIBIT J

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Adopted August 5, 2015
Resolution No. 15-371
Amended ____________, 2016
Resolution No. 16-___
Prepared by:

Environmental Science Associates
In Association with:

Morton & Pitalo
Municipal Consulting Group
Dahlin Group
Furhman Leamy Land Group
An Amendment to the HewlettPackard Roseville Campus
Master Plan

C i t y o f R o s e v i l l e
Contents

PREFACE i

PLANNING FRAMEWORK
01 The HPCO Project Area

1.1 Strategic Location 1-1

1.2 Shovel Ready Site 1-4

1.3 History of Thoughtful Planning 1-7
02 A Blueprint Community

2.1 Sacramento Region Blueprint 2-1

2.2 Community Form 2-3

2.3 Planning Principles 2-6
03 Project Components

3.1 Land Use 3-1

3.2 Mobility 3-7

3.3 Utilities 3-21

3.4 Parks, Schools and Libraries 3-34

3.5 Public Safety 3-45

HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT PLAN
04 Hewlett-Packard Campus Development Plan

4.1 Land Use and Zoning 4-1

4.2 Infrastructure Components 4-8

4.3 Intensity Thresholds 4-9

4.4 Development Guidelines 4-13

4.5 Streamlined Development Review Process 4-16

CAMPUS OAKS DEVELOPMENT PLAN
05 Campus Oaks Development Plan

5.1 Land Use and Zoning 5-1

5.2 Permitted Use Types 5-12

5.3 Development Standards 5-14

CONTENTS

5.4 Design Guidelines 5-24

5.5 Affordable Housing 5-25

5.6 Minor Residential Density Transfers 5-30

5.7 Campus Oaks Phasing 5-32

ADMINISTRATION
06 Administration

6.1 Related Documents 6-1

6.2 Subsequent Approvals 6-3

6.3 Consistency and Amendment Process 6-4
City of Roseville i
Preface
The Hewlett-Packard Roseville Campus Master Plan established development regulations for approximately 500 acres at the southwest corner of Blue Oaks and Foothills Boulevards within the City of Roseville’s North Industrial Planning Area. Originally adopted in June 1996, the Master Plan envisioned a manufacturing and office campus to accommodate Hewlett-Packard’s existing and planned operations. Hewlett-Packard has subsequently adjusted its facilities needs for the Roseville campus, divesting its ownership in all but a portion of the Master Plan Area. While substantial development has occurred on the eastern portion of the Master Plan Area, including Hewlett-Packard’s facilities, the western portion has remained undeveloped.

This amendment to the Master Plan incorporates the Hewlett-Packard|Campus Oaks (HPCO) Master Plan, providing for a mixed use community on a 375.7 acre portion of the original Master Plan Area. The HPCO Project Area is organized into two physically and functionally integrated sub-areas: the Hewlett-Packard Campus accommodating existing and planned light industrial, recreation and related uses; and Campus Oaks planned for a new mix of tech/business park (LI), office, commercial, residential, park and recreation, open space and public uses.

The HPCO Master Plan supersedes all prior Master Plan requirements for the HPCO Project Area. All development projects, infrastructure improvements and other activities within the Project Area are required to be consistent with this Master Plan and related documents. The HPCO Master Plan is intended to provide a framework for development while maintaining flexibility.

Project Objectives
The following objectives build upon and broaden those established by the original 1996 Master Plan:
 Accommodate the intended dynamic growth of the Hewlett-Packard Campus  Enable Hewlett-Packard to continue locating its buildings and operations on a single consolidated campus providing for operational and logistical efficiency  Satisfy the needs of Hewlett-Packard to maintain facility siting and sizing flexibility and the ability to respond quickly to changing business conditions in the dynamic markets in which it competes

PREFACE

ii
 Support the aspirations of Hewlett-Packard to build and operate its facilities within a mixed use master planned community that provides opportunities for convenient and sustainable relationships between employees and nearby housing opportunities, commercial services, and open-space and recreational amenities
 Continue to provide sufficient land designated for employment uses to meet the City’s goals for employment generation, a positive jobs/housing balance, and economic sustainability  Construct infrastructure improvements that support development of the HPCO Project Area, and compliment and complete the larger circulation network and utility systems in the project vicinity  Develop the HPCO Project Area in a manner consistent with the intent of the Sacramento Region Blueprint and Sustainable Communities Strategy, Roseville’s Blueprint Implementation Strategies, and other smart growth principles
HPCO Master Plan Organization

PLANNING FRAMEWORK
Setting, planning principles, and land use, mobility, utility and public services components.

HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Hewlett-Packard Campus land use, zoning, development guidelines, and development review.

CAMPUS OAKS DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Campus Oaks land use, zoning, design guidelines, affordable housing and density transfers.

ADMINISTRATION
Related documents, subsequent entitlements, and interpretations, modifications and amendments.

A BLUEPRINT COMMUNITY
Planning Framework

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

City of Roseville 1-1
01 The HPCO Project Area
The HPCO Project Area has been designated for development since 1978. Surrounded by established employment, commercial and residential uses, the eastern portion of the Project Area is partially developed by Hewlett-Packard, one of Roseville’s largest employers. Adjacent roadway and utility improvements serving the site have long been accounted for in the City’s infrastructure planning and where applicable within associated funding programs, and natural resource impacts have been addressed, including Section 404 wetland permitting. On all accounts, the HPCO Project Area is “shovel ready” for an updated development approach.

1.1 Strategic Location The HPCO Project Area encompasses the southern and western portions of Hewlett-Packard Roseville Campus Master Plan Area located within the City of Roseville’s North Industrial Planning Area (Figure 1-1). The 375.7 acre HPCO Project Area is bounded by Blue Oaks Boulevard to the north, Foothills Boulevard to the east, and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard to the west.

The Project Area is situated to take advantage of its desirable central location, high visibility, ease of regional access, and favorable market position to attract renewed growth opportunities to the City.

The HPCO Project Area is organized into two mutually supportive and intimately connected planning sub-areas; the Hewlett-Packard Campus and Campus Oaks (Figure 1-2):
 Hewlett-Packard Campus. Covering the eastern 141.2 acres of the Project Area, this sub-area currently includes Hewlett-Packard’s facilities. The Hewlett-Packard Campus is planned for continued light industrial, recreation and related development.
 Campus Oaks. Covering the western 234.5 acres of the Project Area, this sub-area is currently undeveloped, with the southern portion established as a City open space preserve. Campus Oaks is planned for a mix of tech/business park (LI), office, commercial, residential, park and recreation, open space and public uses. 01 THE HPCO PROJECT AREA
1-2 Planning Framework

FIGURE 1-1: Original Master Plan Area

City of Roseville 1-3

FIGURE 1-2: HPCO Project Area and Planning Sub-Areas
01 THE HPCO PROJECT AREA
1-4 Planning Framework

1.2 Shovel Ready Site
As one of the largest infill sites in the South Placer Region, the HPCO Project Area has a number of unique advantages that are conducive to development:
 Prior planning and development. The HPCO Project
Area has been designated for development for over
35 years, with a portion of the Hewlett-Packard
Campus partially developed with light industrial and
office uses along with parking lots, internal
roadways, and recreation facilities. Prior planning
efforts and analysis have long contemplated
development of the site.
 Limited resource constraints. The undeveloped
portions of the HPCO Project Area consist primarily of
annual grasslands with gently rolling topography that
has been highly disturbed over time through biannual disk plowing. There are limited environmental constraints outside of the City owned open space
preserve located along the South Branch of Pleasant
Grove Creek within the southern portion of Campus
Oaks. This preserve was created as part of a
previously approved Section 404 (Clean Water Act)
nationwide permit agreement to grade and fill waters
of the U.S within the larger Plan Area.
 Existing utility connections. Water, wastewater,
recycled water, drainage, electric, natural gas, and
telecommunications infrastructure exist within and
adjacent to the HPCO Project Area. Included is an
electric substation on the Hewlett-Packard Campus,
a 16-inch Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) highpressure gas line that runs north-south through the Project Area, as well as overhead power lines along
adjacent arterials. Adequate capacity for
development has been accounted for in the City’s
infrastructure planning and, where applicable, within
current funding programs.
 Regional roadway connections. Existing roadways
provide direct local and regional access to the HPCO
Project Area. Blue Oaks Boulevard, located along the
northern edge of the Project Area, is the primary eastwest transportation corridor in the northern portion Hewlett Packard of Roseville and is projected to be one of the City’s

City of Roseville 1-5
most traveled roads in the future. Blue Oaks connects the western sections of Roseville to Highway 65 just east of the Project Area, which then intersects with Interstate 80 approximately 3 miles further to the east. Foothills and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevards, along the eastern and western edges of the Project Area, are key north-south connections planned to eventually extend north into the Sunset Industrial/potential future Placer Ranch development area(s). Foothills Boulevard is planned to connect to future Placer Parkway.
 Compatible surrounding development. The HPCO Project Area is surrounded by a broad range of compatible uses. Adjacent development includes existing light industrial, as well as vacant parcels zoned for light industrial use, to the east within the North Industrial Planning Area; commercial and residential uses to the north also within the North Industrial Planning Area; residential uses, a retail center and the Pleasant Grove Creek open space to the west within the North Roseville Specific Plan (1997); residential uses and the Woodcreek Oaks Golf Course to the south within the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan (1989); and the City’s pump station and recycled water tank to the southwest.

Existing conditions and surrounding uses are illustrated on Figure 1-3.

Open Space Preserve
Campus Oaks
01 THE HPCO PROJECT AREA
1-6 Planning Framework

FIGURE 1-3: Existing Conditions and Surrounding Uses

City of Roseville 1-7

1.3 History of Thoughtful Planning
The original 500 acre Master Plan Area was initially designated with light industrial land use in 1978. HewlettPackard purchased the Master Plan Area in early 1979 and was granted an initial Use Permit approval (UP 79-04) to develop 1.4 million square feet for computer manufacturing and distribution facilities on the southeast corner of the site adjacent to Foothills Boulevard. Construction began in 1981, with Use Permits for reconfiguration and an additional 1 million square feet of development subsequently approved in 1987 (UP 87-39 and SUP 87-40). Combined, a total of 2.4 million square feet of development was approved.

In 1996, the City adopted the Hewlett-Packard Roseville Campus Master Plan, including an Environmental Impact Report and Development Agreement, to guide buildout of the Master Plan Area. The Master Plan contained land use and zoning regulations, infrastructure plans, development guidelines, traffic and utility thresholds, and a streamlined development approval process. The objectives of the Master Plan were to accommodate Hewlett-Packard’s intended growth and expansion; locate this growth contiguous to the business activities already established on the site; and provide flexibility to respond quickly to changing business conditions in the dynamic markets in which the company competes.

Hewlett-Packard Roseville Campus Initial Construction, 1981 01 THE HPCO PROJECT AREA
1-8 Planning Framework
The 1996 Master Plan provided for 4,239,000 square feet of light industrial and commercial land uses, as well as establishment of a wetland preserve on the southwest portion of the Plan Area. The Master Plan assumed a 25 year buildout. At the time of Master Plan approval, the Plan Area contained

1.3 million square feet of development in ten manufacturing, distribution, support, maintenance and office buildings on approximately 195 acres. An estimated 4,100 full and part-time workers were employed on the site.

In 2001, the Master Plan was amended to replace all commercial uses within the Plan Area with a light industrial land use, and remove the Woodcreek Oaks right-of-way reducing overall Master Plan Area acreage to 497.7 acres. The City subsequently exercised an option to purchase the southwest corner of the Plan Area to support a 1.5 million gallon recycled water tank and pumping station. This site was also removed from the Master Plan Area, further reducing its size to 492.17 acres.

In 2008, the 45.9 acre wetland preserve was dedicated to the City. Upon acceptance, the City formed a Community Facilities District (CFD) to fund preserve area monitoring, reporting and maintenance. The agreement for the City to accept the preserve included a requirement that Hewlett-Packard back-up the CFD funding mechanism.

In the intervening years, Hewlett-Packard has continued to adjust its facilities needs for the Roseville campus and has divested its ownership of a majority of the Master Plan Area. Despite efforts to promote a single use light industrial campus, a significant portion of the Plan Area has remained undeveloped. Undeveloped industrial properties and vacant built space also exist within the remainder of the North Industrial Planning Area, as well as within the expansive 8,800 acre Sunset Industrial Area to the north within unincorporated Placer County.

The HPCO Master Plan encompasses 375.7 acres of the original 500 acre Master Plan Area. This amendment followed the Hewlett-Packard Foundation’s sale of the western 189 acres of the Master Plan Area. In response to updated market opportunities and development preferences, the HPCO Master Plan provides for a revised mix of employment, commercial, residential, park and recreation, open space and public uses.

The HPCO Master Plan capitalizes on the unique opportunity to create a mixed use infill community that locates jobs, housing choices, and services in close proximity to one another. The intent is to stimulate mutually supportive land use, economic, and social interactions, thereby reenergizing the Master Plan Area.

The history of the Master Plan’s entitlements and corresponding development intensities is summarized in Table 1-1.

City of Roseville 1-9
TABLE 1-1 Master Plan Entitlement History
Adoption/
Amendment Land Use Existing Development
Future
Development
Total
Capacity
1996 Master Plan
adopted providing
for light industrial
and commercial
uses, and an open
space preserve
425.80 ac
Light Industrial

28.50 ac
Commercial

45.90 ac
Open Space
1,300,000 sf
Light Industrial
2,691,000 sf
Light Industrial
248,000 sf
Commercial
3,991,000 sf
Light Industrial
248,000 sf
Commercial
TOTAL 500.2 ac 1,300,000 sf 2,939,000 sf 4,239,000 sf
2001 Master Plan
amended to
convert 28.5 acres
of commercial to
light industrial
451.80 ac
Light Industrial

45.90 ac
Open Space
1,580,000 sf
Light Industrial
2,637,000 sf
Light Industrial
4,217,000 sf
Light Industrial
TOTAL 497.7 ac1 1,580,000 sf 2,637,000 sf 4,217,000 sf
2015 Master Plan
amended to
incorporate the
HPCO Master Plan
providing for a
revised mix of light
industrial,
commercial, office,
tech/ business
park, residential,
park and
recreation, open
space and public
uses
2016 Master Plan
amended to
reconfigure
residential and
office land uses.

Overall dwelling
unit and square
footage allocations
maintained.

HPCO PROJECT AREA:
129.24 ac
Light Industrial

32.85 ac
Tech/Business Park (LI)

10.54 ac
Office

19.29 ac
Commercial

99.33 ac
Residential

21.69 ac
Parks

46.35 Open Space

16.44 ac
Public & Roads

REMAINDER OF
MASTER PLAN AREA:
114.74 ac
Light Industrial

1.70 ac
Public & Roads
1,231,820 sf
Light Industrial

1,468,180 sf
Light Industrial
300,000 sf
Tech/Business Park
60,000 sf
Office
170,000 sf
Commercial
948 du
Residential

2,700,000 sf
Light Industrial
300,000 sf
Tech/Business Park
60,000 sf
Office
170,000 sf
Commercial
948 du
Residential

TOTAL 492.17 ac2 1,231,820 sf3 948 du
1,998,180 sf
948 du
3,230,000 sf
Source: Hewlett-Packard Roseville Campus Master Plan 1996 and 2001, Hewlett-Packard 2015 and Morton & Pitalo 2015.

1. The reduction in total Master Plan Area acreage between 1996 and 2001 reflects removal of the Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard right-of-way from the Master Plan boundaries, as well as updated survey information.

2. The reduction in total Master Plan Area acreage between 2001 and 2015 reflects City purchase of a recycled water tank and pumping station site and removal of that area from the Master Plan, as well as updated survey information.

3. The reduction in existing development between 2001 and 2015 reflects demolition of Building R2, as well as updated building information provided by Hewlett-Packard.
01 THE HPCO PROJECT AREA
1-10 Planning Framework
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

City of Roseville 2-1
02 A Blueprint Community
The HPCO Master Plan provides for an integrated mix of jobs, housing, services, and amenities. The Project Area presents a one of a kind opportunity to create a landmark infill project that furthers the City’s commitment to the Sacramento Regional Blueprint and other “smart growth” principles. The HPCO Master Plan builds upon the City’s planning documents including the General Plan, Blueprint Implementation Strategies, Communitywide Sustainability Action Plan, Pedestrian Master Plan and Bicycle Master Plan to deliver an environmentally sound project that enhances livability and quality of life, and contributes economic benefits to the community.

2.1 Sacramento Region Blueprint
Since initial construction began on the Hewlett-Packard Campus in 1981, Roseville and the surrounding region have grown substantially. With continued growth, there has been increasing emphasis on the need to develop in smart and responsible ways. Where employers prefer to locate and employees desire to live and work is different today than it was in years past when job centers were planned separate from residential and other uses. As illustrated in the booming Silicon Valley, “campuses” are prospering that provide for an integrated mix of uses and apply smart growth principles.

Smart Growth seeks to align housing, employment, services, mobility and other factors to create livable, environmentally sensitive and economically vibrant communities.

Within the Sacramento Region, the key tenets of smart growth are embodied within the Sacramento Area Council of Governments Regional Blueprint Project. Establishing a framework for future growth, the Blueprint focuses on reducing congestion and associated air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, providing for a greater range of housing choices, encouraging reinvestment in already developed areas, and better integrating the proximity of jobs to housing. As a mixed use infill project, the HPCO Master Plan presents a unique opportunity to meaningfully implement the Blueprint’s growth principles.
02 A BLUEPRINT COMMUNITY
2-2 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

Sacramento Region Blueprint
Roseville has been a leader in implementing the Sacramento Region Blueprint Project. The City collaborated with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) and its member agencies in the six-county Sacramento region to agree on a policy framework to accommodate growth over the next 50 years. Adopted in 2004, the Blueprint advances seven growth principles:
1 TRANSPORTATION CHOICES. Designing development to encourage people to walk, ride bicycles, use public transit and carpool.
2 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS. Establishing places where mixed use development can occur to provide a variety of jobs, residences, goods and services in close proximity. 3 COMPACT DEVELOPMENT. Creating more compactly built environments that use the land in an efficient manner.
4 HOUSING CHOICES. Providing a variety of places where people can live in response to multiple socio-economic needs.
5 USE OF EXISTING ASSETS. Developing vacant or underutilized infill lands that make better use of existing infrastructure and resources.
6 QUALITY DESIGN. Furthering urban design that creates attractive and connected communities with a strong sense of place.
7 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION. Incorporating public use open space, habitat and agricultural preservation, and environmentally friendly developments practices.

Roseville was the first city in the region to adopt a Blueprint Implementation Strategy, outlining a menu of strategies to achieve Blueprint’s growth principles.

City of Roseville 2-3

2.2 Community Form
The HPCO Project Area’s physical form is organized into four distinct “districts” each distinguished by its mix of uses and intended built character (see Figure 2-1). While each district has a unique purpose, the districts are interrelated and functionally overlap, creating a mutually supportive mix of uses. These interrelationships are enhanced by the compact development pattern and interconnected street and trail systems that place jobs, housing and services in close proximity to each other.

EMPLOYMENT CENTER
The Employment Center includes existing and planned light industrial uses within the Hewlett-Packard Campus, as well the Tech/Business Park (LI) uses within Campus Oaks. When combined with other employment uses within the larger Master Plan Area, these uses comprise a major integrated job center in the City providing for 3 million square feet of existing and planned employment uses. The Employment Center addresses the City’s desire to retain employment opportunities within the Project Area to support the jobs/housing balance in the City, as well as to continue to position the North Industrial Planning Area as a major employment/industrial center for the South Placer region.

The proximity of a diverse range of housing and available services for employees is one of the first factors considered when businesses contemplate locating in a community. By providing for a closely integrated mix of jobs, housing, services and amenities, the HPCO Master Plan enhances the appeal of the Project Area and nearby industrial uses for employment attraction and retention, further strengthening Roseville’s position as the region’s community of choice for business investment.

RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS
The Residential Neighborhoods provide for comfortable, well connected and walkable living environments attractive to residents and accommodating the nearby workforce. Included are lower density, medium density and higher density attached and detached housing types within Campus Oaks that support a diversity of living options and lifestyles.

The form and diversity of the neighborhoods furthers the direction of the City’s General Plan and Blueprint Implementation Strategies to deliver a variety of housing choices in proximity to jobs and services, address the need for additional housing to support employees and job generation, supply new opportunities for the City to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation, and advance the City’s goal for a jobs/housing balance.

“Without the addition of
residential opportunities,
or the reduction of
employment generating
land uses within Roseville
and/or the adjacent
jurisdictions, sufficient
employees will not exist to
fill potential job generation
within reasonable
commute distances.”

CITY OF ROSEVILLE GENERAL
PLAN 2025
02 A BLUEPRINT COMMUNITY
2-4 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

FIGURE 2-1: Community Form Districts

City of Roseville 2-5

CAMPUS OAKS TOWN CENTER
The Campus Oaks Town Center is envisioned as a destination where residents, employees and passers-by can shop, eat, recreate, obtain services and meet their everyday needs. Integrating an interactive mix of retail and office uses, emphasis is placed on creating a pedestrian friendly environment with easy access between uses and connectivity to the adjacent Residential Neighborhoods and Employment Center.

The Campus Oaks Town Center has been strategically located at the northern entry into the HPCO Project Area to create a sense of arrival and enhance its visibility, access, and standing as an integral and defining component of the community.

PARKS & OPEN SPACE
Incorporated within the HPCO Project Area is a green network of parks, paseos, open spaces, trails, and active tree-lined streetscapes that enhance community interaction, character and sense of place. Parks and open space in the Project Area provide for passive/informal/self-directed and active/ formal/programmable recreational opportunities, serve as gathering places for residents and employees, help to establish a communal sense of identity and ownership, and provide for natural resource protection. 02 A BLUEPRINT COMMUNITY
2-6 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

2.3 Planning Principles

REENERGIZE EMPLOYMENT GROWTH
Instill renewed “open for business” energy encouraging
new employment growth and investment:
 Open up the Hewlett-Packard Campus by
enhancing public access, connectivity and visibility
into and through the Master Plan Area
 Accommodate the desire of Hewlett-Packard to
build and operate their facilities within a mixed
use community by integrating an array of housing
choices, convenient services, and accessible
community amenities that collectively support the
success of adjacent employment uses
 Accommodate the growth and expansion of
Hewlett-Packard in a manner that allows for
operational synergies and efficiencies
 Provide for substantial employment development
in a consolidated campus setting
 Establish a flexible regulatory structure for
businesses to quickly respond to changing
conditions, including a streamlined development
review process for the Hewlett-Packard Campus

BUILD UPON EXISTING ASSETS
Capitalize on the HPCO Project Area’s central location to efficiently support new development:
 Target new development on property that is
surrounded by existing industrial, residential and
commercial uses
 Tie into existing roadway and utility systems,
lowering the capital investment and infrastructure
burdens required to support development
 Replace long-standing undeveloped properties
with market ready, economically productive uses
that strengthen land values and the tax base

City of Roseville 2-7

PROVIDE DIVERSE HOUSING CHOICES
Create distinct neighborhoods within Campus Oaks that offer socio-economic vitality and support the workforce:
 Include a wide range of housing densities, lot sizes and product types appealing to different economic and life-style segments  Address the desire for housing nearby and conveniently connected to jobs
 Integrate densities, innovative product types and public amenities that support “urban” living options attractive to a growing market segment
 Contribute to the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation and affordability goal

ESTABLISH A TOWN CENTER
Provide for a vibrant Town Center within Campus Oaks as a destination for residents, employees and visitors:
 Create a commercial setting along the northern community entry (HP Way) enhancing sense of arrival and identity
 Overlap interfaces and access between retail and office uses  Provide for convenience retail, grocery, restaurant and service uses to meet residents’ and employees’ daily needs
 Position the Town Center along Blue Oaks Boulevard expanding its ability to attract activity, users and sales tax revenue

OFFER MEANINGFUL PUBLIC SPACES
Include an enhanced network of public spaces to inspire community activity, interaction, and identity:
 Provide interconnected parks, paseos and open space areas to support recreational activities and social gathering
 Encourage resident and employee interactions through a variety of facilities that support performance arts, farmers markets, arts and craft shows and other activities
 Enhance access to and through the open space preserve to promote passive recreation, and environmental stewardship and education 02 A BLUEPRINT COMMUNITY
2-8 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

MAXIMIZE MOBILITY OPTIONS
Maximize connectivity, walkability and convenience to support a variety of mobility choices:
 Establish a mixed use, compact development pattern that creates proximity and interactions between uses, reducing trip lengths and the need for travel outside of the HPCO Project Area for daily needs  Incorporate a safe and interconnected network of paths, sidewalks and bike lanes for use by both residents and employees
 Provide a modified grid street pattern that includes a long sought after public roadway connection (HP Way) through the Master Plan Area from Foothills Boulevard to Blue Oaks Boulevard  Designate the central portion of HP Way as a local oriented, pedestrian friendly “complete street” that presents a highly walkable and bikeable environment

FACILITATE RESPONSIBLE LIVING
Facilitate healthy lifestyles, resource conservation and efficiency, and a reduced carbon footprint in new development:
 Integrate a mix of land uses, mobility systems and public spaces that encourage walking, biking, and community activity
 Incorporate solar powered homes, encourage LEED or similar green building standards, and include electric vehicle charging stations
 Provide recycled water for irrigation, incorporate native and adaptive drought tolerant plants, and integrate efficient irrigation systems
 Use Low Impact Development techniques such as natural bio-swales and water quality basins to increase stormwater filtration and reduce run-off
 Incorporate relevant and cost effective measures from the City’s Communitywide Sustainability Action Plan to lower emissions, increase energy and water efficiency, and reduce the waste stream

City of Roseville 2-9

ENSURE QUALITY DESIGN
Ensure attractive and creative urban design that enhances community identity, livability and marketability:
 Retain and take advantage of the natural rolling
topography on Campus Oaks
 Create pleasant streetscapes with landscaping, tree
canopies, separated sidewalks, bulb-outs, enhanced
crossings, street furnishings and other pedestrian
amenities
 Encourage innovative and creative building,
landscape and site designs that are attractive,
create visual interest and variety, enhance
walkability, and are in scale with and functionally
related to adjacent development
 Establish gateways to provide a sense of identity
and arrival into the Plan Area

ENABLE EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION
Enable implementation in an efficient and flexible manner that maximizes the HPCO Project Area’s full potential:
 Apply financial resources and funding mechanisms to maintain an economically self-sufficient plan that provides a positive contribution to the City’s General Fund, incorporates community facilities services funding, and fully funds Project Area infrastructure
 Construct infrastructure improvements that compliment and help to complete the City’s larger circulation network and utility systems
 Provide for expedited approval of light industrial projects determined consistent with this Master Plan  Maintain flexibility to adapt to evolving land use, market and other opportunities over time 02 A BLUEPRINT COMMUNITY
2-10 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

City of Roseville 3-1
03 Project Components
The HPCO Master Plan provides for the coordinated development of the Hewlett-Packard Campus and Campus Oaks as an integrated community. The intent is to ensure that development, public improvements and other activities successfully realize the project’s Planning Principles. The following summarizes Project Area land use, mobility, utilities and public services components that form the overall framework for development. Land use designations, zoning districts, design guidelines and other provisions specific to the Hewlett-Packard Campus and Campus Oaks are included in Section 04, Hewlett-Packard Campus Development Plan, and Section 05, Campus Oaks Development Plan, respectively.

3.1 Land Use
The HPCO Master Plan provides for a
broad mix of employment, commercial,
residential and public uses.

Approximately 51 percent of Project
Area acreage is designated for
employment and commercial land uses,
26 percent for residential land uses,
and 23 percent for parks, open space
and public land uses. At buildout, the
Project Area will support 1.73 million
square feet of non-residential
development generating approximately
2,500 to 4,100 jobs1 depending upon
the ultimate composition and operations
of employment uses. The Project Area
also supports 948 dwelling units
providing for approximately 2,474
residents2.

1 Based upon 433-750 s.f. per employee for LI & T/BP, 302-333 s.f. per employee for BP, and 400-450 s.f. per employee for CC (Economic Planning Systems and Institute of Transportation Engineers 2015). 2 Based upon 2.61 persons per household (City of Roseville 2015). 03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-2 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

3.1.1 SPECIFIC LAND USES
Employment and Commercial. The HPCO Master Plan
integrates Light Industrial (LI), Tech/Business Park
(T/BP -LI), Business Professional (BP) and Community
Commercial (CC) land uses. A range of employment,
business, office, retail, restaurant, service,
entertainment, and related uses are permitted. In
addition, the Master Plan supports an integrated mix
of retail and office uses within the Campus Oaks
Town Center.

Residential. The HPCO Master Plan incorporates Low
Density Residential (LDR), Medium Density
Residential (MDR) and High Density Residential
(HDR) land uses within Campus Oaks. This mix of
densities provides for a wide array of housing types
ranging from both standard and small lot single
family residential, cluster housing, attached and
detached townhomes, row housing and apartments.

Park, Open Space and Public. The HPCO Master Plan
includes Park & Recreation (P/R), Open Space (OS)
and Public (P/QP) land uses. A variety of uses are
provided including parks, recreational facilities,
paseos, trails, open space, a fire station, a
groundwater well and an electric substation.

3.1.2 ZONING
Land uses are implemented through the zoning
district applied to each parcel. This includes the
application of the Development Standard (DS) and
Special Area (SA) overlay districts to customize
allowed uses and development standards to address
the Project Area’s unique opportunities and
objectives. Section 04, Hewlett-Packard Campus
Development Plan, and Section 05, Campus Oaks
Development Plan, define parcel specific land use
and zoning regulations.

HPCO Master Plan land uses are illustrated on Figure 3-1 and summarized in Table 3-1. Parcel Specific land use and zoning allocations are included on Table 3-2.

City of Roseville 3-3

FIGURE 3-1: HPCO Project Area Land Use Diagram
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-4 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
TABLE 3-1: HPCO Project Area Land Use Summary
Land Use Gross
Acres
Building Square Feet (sf) Dwelling Units (du)
Existing Future Total
Capacity
FAR
Range
Avg.

FAR Units du/ac Range
Avg.
du/ac

EMPLOYMENT AND COMMERCIAL USES
Light Industrial (LI)
Tech/Business Park (T/BP-LI)
Business Professional (BP)
Community Commercial (CC)
Sub-Total
129.24 ac

32.85 ac

10.54 ac

19.29 ac
191.92 ac
593,820 sf
593,820 sf
606,180 sf
300,000 sf
60,000 sf
170,000 sf
1,136,180 sf
1,200,000 sf
300,000 sf
60,000 sf
170,000 sf
1, 730.000 sf
20-50%
20-40%
10-40%
20-40%
21%
21%
13%
20%
21%

RESIDENTIAL USES
Low Density (LDR)
Medium Density (MDR)
High Density (HDR)
Sub-Total

44.26 ac

33.01 ac

22.06 ac

99.33 ac
230 du
261 du
457 du
948 du

0.5-6.9

7.0-12.9

13.0+

5.2 7.9

20.7 9.5

PARK, OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC USES
Park & Recreation (P/R)
Paseo (P/R)
Open Space (OS)
Public (P/QP)
Sub-Total

19.44 ac

2.25 ac

46.35 ac

2.97 ac

71.01 ac
Backbone Roads 13.47 ac
TOTAL 375.73 ac 593,820 sf 1,136,180 sf 1,730.000 sf 21% 948 du 9.5 NOTE: Existing development consists of Buildings R3 (126,220 sf), R4 (131,190 sf), R5 (158,760 sf), and R6 (177,650 sf). See Section 04, Hewlett-Packard Development Plan, for additional detail.

City of Roseville 3-5
TABLE 3-2: HPCO Land Use and Zoning by Parcel
Parcel Zoning Gross
Acres
Dwelling Units (du) Square Feet (sf)
Allocated Units Density (du/ac) Allocated Square Feet FAR

EMPLOYMENT AND COMMERCIAL USES
Light Industrial ( LI)
HP-1 LI/SA 114.00 ac 1,157,820 sf 23%
HP-3 LI/SA 13.23 ac 42,180 sf 7%
HP-4 LI/SA 2.01 ac - -
Sub-Total 129.24 ac 1,200,000 sf 21%
Tech/Business Park – Light Industrial (T/BP LI)
C0-51 MP/SA 15.20 ac 150,000 sf 23%
CO-52 MP/SA 17.65 ac 150,000 sf 20%
Sub-Total 32.85 ac 300,000 sf 21%
Business Professional (BP)
CO-21 BP 5.00 ac 28,000 sf 13%
C0-31 BP 5.54 ac 32,000 sf 13%
Sub-Total 10.54 ac 60,000 sf 13%
Community Commercial (CC)
C0-41 CC 13.16 ac 120,000 sf 21%
CO-42 CC 6.13 ac 50,000 sf 19%
Sub-Total 19.29 ac 170,000 sf 20%
Sub-Total Employment & Comm. 191.92 ac 1,7300,000 sf 21%

RESIDENTIAL USES
Low Density Residential (LDR)
C0-1 RS/DS 6.10 ac 36 du 5.9 du/ac
CO-2 RS/DS 6.21 ac 36 du 5.8 du/ac
CO-3 R1/DS 16.53 ac 64 du 3.9 du/ac
CO-6 RS/DS 5.64 ac 36 du 6.4 du/ac
CO-7 RS/DS 9.78 ac 58 du 5.9 du/ac
Sub-Total 44.26 ac 230 du 5.2 du/ac
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
C0-4 RS/DS 7.06 ac 60 du 8.5 du/ac
CO-5 RS/DS 4.69 ac 46 du 9.8 du/ac
CO-11 RS/DS 4.72 ac 34 du 7.2 du/ac
CO-12 RS/DS 4.79 ac 34 du 7.1 du/ac
CO-13 RS/DS 3.34 ac 24 du 7.2 du/ac
CO-14 RS/DS 4.43 ac 34 du 7.7 du/ac
CO-15 RS/DS 2.62 ac 19 du 7.3 du/ac
CO-16 RS/DS 1.36 ac 10 du 7.4 du/ac
Sub-Total 33.01 ac 261 du 7.0 du/ac
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-6 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
TABLE 3-2: HPCO Land Use and Zoning by Parcel (continued) Parcel Zoning Gross
Acres
Dwelling Units (du) Square Feet (sf)
Allocated
Units
Density
(du/ac)
Allocated
Square Feet FAR
RESIDENTIAL USES (cont.)
High Density Residential (HDR)
CO-22 R3/DS 8.40 ac 210 du 25.0 du/ac
CO-23 R3/DS 8.95 ac 185 du 20.7 du/ac
CO-24a R3/DS 2.36 ac 31 du 13.1 du/ac
CO-24b R3/DS 2.35 ac 31 du 13.2 du/ac
Sub-Total 22.06 ac 457 du 20.7 du/ac
Sub-Total Residential 99.33 ac 948 du 9.5 du/ac

PARKS, OPEN SPACE & PUBLIC USES
Parks (P/R)
HP-21 PR 8.7 ac
C0-61 PR 5.70 ac
CO-62 PR 2.62 ac
CO-64 PR 2.42 ac
Sub-Total 19.44 ac
Paseos (P/R)
CO-63 PR (Paseo) 0.90 ac
CO-65 PR (Paseo) 1.35 ac
Sub-Total 2.25 ac
Open Space (OS)
C0-81 OS 0.84 ac
CO-82 OS 0.86 ac
CO-83 OS 44.65 ac
Sub-Total 46.35 ac
Public (P/QP)
RE-1 P/QP 0.50 ac
CO-75 P/QP 2.15 ac
CO-76 P/QP 0.32 ac
Sub-Total 2.97 ac
Sub-Total Parks, OS & Public 71.01 ac
Backbone Roads 13.47 ac
TOTAL 375.73 ac 948 du 9.5 du/ac 1,730.000 sf 21%

1. Parcel HP-2 park acreage credited towards Campus Oaks. See Table 3-5.

City of Roseville 3-7

3.2 Mobility
The HPCO Project Area mobility system is designed to maximize connectivity, walkability and convenience. Included is a modified grid street pattern that compliments and helps to complete the City’s larger roadway network; a safe and interconnected system of paths, sidewalks and bike lanes; and multiple transit stops. Emphasis is placed upon enhancing access between jobs, homes, services and amenities, allowing residents and employees to walk and bike between uses.

The interconnected mobility system, combined with the Project Area’s mixed use development pattern, internalizes trips; reducing trip lengths and the demand for travel outside of the Area for daily needs. As a result, the HPCO Master Plan land uses result in a reduction in external vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled when compared to the prior land uses.

3.2.1 ROADWAYS
The HPCO Master Plan establishes a network of roadways that are safe, functional, aesthetically pleasing, and contribute positively to overall community character. Roadways integrate the concept of “Complete Streets”, promoting designs that comfortably provide for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit, and vehicles.

Regional Access
Three existing arterial roadways provide access to the Project Area: Blue Oaks Boulevard to the north, Foothills Boulevard to the east, and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard to the west. Blue Oaks Boulevard is a 6 to 8- lane arterial and the primary east-west transportation corridor in the northern portion of the City, linking to Highway 65 just east of the Project Area. Foothills and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevards are key north-south arterial routes planned to eventually extend north into the Sunset Industrial/Placer Ranch Development Area, with Foothills Boulevard connecting to future Placer Parkway.

Direct access to the Project Area consists of several signalized intersections: Two existing along Blue Oaks Boulevard; one existing on Foothills Boulevard; and two planned along Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard.

Foothills Boulevard is improved as a 4-lane arterial. Frontage improvements will be installed along Blue Oaks Boulevard. Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard will be widened to 4-lanes adjacent to the Project Area.

Internal Backbone Roadway System
Internal Project Area backbone roadways consist of a network of public collector streets. Key to the internal and larger citywide roadway system is 03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-8 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
the long sought after extension of HP Way as a public road through the Project Area. HP Way links to the future extension of Roseville Parkway at Foothills Boulevard, curving northwest through the Project Area to Blue Oaks Boulevard. Other roadway connections include the extensions of New Meadow Drive from the north, and Painted Desert and Crimson Ridge Drives from the west. Residential streets will provide in-tract subdivision access, and private drives will continue to provide internal access within the Hewlett-Packard Campus.

As the gateway to and a defining element through the Project Area, the central portion of the HP Way corridor is intended to be improved and maintained as a pedestrian and bicycle friendly 2-lane facility. To enhance the convenience, safety and comfort for pedestrians and cyclists, the HP Way corridor is planned to include sidewalks separated from the street by tree lined landscaped parkways; bike lanes buffered from vehicle travel; pedestrian bulb outs and enhanced intersection crossings; and, roundabouts and other traffic calming measures.

Neighborhood Electric Vehicles
A majority of the streets in the Project Area may accommodate neighborhood electric vehicles. A neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV) is an electric-powered four wheel low speed vehicle that allows residents to make local trips. Per the California Vehicle Code, NEV’s may be driven on any public roadway with a posted speed of 35 miles per hour or less, and may cross roadways with a speed limit in excess of 35 miles per hour subject to certain restrictions. NEVs may also be used on all private drives.

The backbone roadway system is reflected on Figure 3-2, with lane capacity, right-of-way, and landscape requirements summarized in Table 3-3. Typical roadway design sections are illustrated in Figures 3-3 through 3-12, with corresponding landscaping standards and related design details included in Section 04, HewlettPackard Campus Development Plan, and Section 05, Campus Oaks Development Plan.

City of Roseville 3-9

FIGURE 3-2: Backbone Roadway System
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-10 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
TABLE 3-3: Roadway Summary
Roadway Type/Name
Roadway Landscape Corridor
Landscape
Median
On-Street
Parking
Figure
Reserved Number
Lane Capacity Right-of-Way Adjacent to LDR & MDR
Adjacent to
Other Uses
ARTERIAL ROADWAYS1
Blue Oaks Boulevard
Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard
8 lanes
4 lanes
130 ft
76 ft
NA
35 ft3
50 – 70 ft2
35 ft
22 ft
14 ft
None
None
3-3
3-4
COLLECTOR ROADWAYS1
HP Way – Entry
HP Way – Central4
Painted Desert Drive, New Meadow
Drive & Crimson Ridge Drive
4 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
81 ft
59 ft
48 ft
NA
25 ft
NA5
25 ft
30 ft
25 ft5
13 ft
13 ft
NA
None
None
Both Sides
3-5
3-6
3-7

LOCAL ROADWAYS
Park Couplet
Primary Residential Street8
Minor Residential Street9
Alley
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
60 ft6
60 ft
54 ft
22 ft
NA5
NA5
NA5
NA
NA5
NA5
NA5
NA
100 ft7
NA
NA
NA
Res. Side
Both Sides
Both Sides
NA
3-8 & 3-11
3-9 & 3-11
3-10 & 3-11
3-12

ROUNDABOUTS, PRIVATE DRIVES AND OTHER FACILITIES
To be designed and constructed per City standards and Campus Oaks Design Guidelines

1. Auxiliary lanes, turn lanes, bus turn-outs, and standard tapers are permitted reductions to the landscape corridors (PUE/LSE). Minimum landscape corridor width of 15’ shall be maintained behind bus shelters.

2. Landscape Corridor along Blue Oaks Boulevard to be 70 feet wide where open drainage channel exists/planned.

3. Landscape corridors adjacent to LDR and MDR along Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard will be incorporated within the right-of-way.

4. The central portion of HP Way is planned to incorporate design elements to enhance pedestrian and bicyclist convenience, safety and comfort. Such elements shall include sidewalks separated from the street by tree lined landscaped parkways; bike lanes buffered from vehicle travel; enhanced intersection crossings; and, roundabouts and other traffic calming measures.

5. Residential units will front on roadways. Street frontage setbacks from back of walk to be established as part subdivision map and/or design review approval as applicable.

6. 30 feet on both sides of Couplet.

7. 100 foot wide neighborhood park.

8. Primary Residential Streets will have separated sidewalks with landscaped parkways. Primary Residential Streets are used to accommodate higher traffic volumes and are placed adjacent to schools and parks, consistent with the City’s roadway improvement standards.

9. Minor Residential Streets will have separated sidewalks with landscaped parkways. Minor Residential Streets are used to carry lower traffic volumes than Primary Residential Streets, consistent with the City’s roadway improvement standards.

Note: Standard signalized intersections will have dedicated turns and through lanes resulting in wider cross sections in those areas.

City of Roseville 3-11
FIGURE 3-3: Blue Oaks Boulevard (Arterial)
FIGURE 3-4: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard (Arterial)
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-12 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

FIGURE 3-5: HP Way – Entry (Modified Collector)

FIGURE 3-6: HP Way – Central (Modified Collector)

City of Roseville 3-13
Note: Residential units will front on Collectors. Street frontage setbacks from back of walk to be established as part subdivision map and/or design review approval as applicable.

FIGURE 3-7: Painted Desert Drive, New Meadow Drive & Crimson Ridge Drive (Collectors) Note: Residential units will front on Park Couplet. Street frontage setbacks from back of walk to be established as part subdivision map and/or design review approval as applicable.

FIGURE 3-8: Park Couplet (Local Street)
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-14 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
Note: Residential units will front on primary residential streets. Street frontage setbacks from back of walk to be established as part subdivision map and/or design review approval as applicable.

FIGURE 3-9: Primary Residential Street (Local Street)

Note: Residential units will front on minor residential streets. Street frontage setbacks from back of walk to be established as part subdivision map and/or design review approval as applicable.

FIGURE 3-10: Minor Residential Street (Local Street)

City of Roseville 3-15

FIGURE 3-11: Bulb-Out (Local Street)

FIGURE 3-12: Alley (Local Street)
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-16 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

3.2.2 PEDESTRIAN and BICYCLE NETWORK
The HPCO Master Plan provides for a safe and interconnected network of paths, sidewalks and bike lanes to allow residents and employees to easily walk and bike to meet their daily needs. The pedestrian and bicycle network is designed to enhance connectivity between jobs, homes and services.

This enhanced connectivity supports alternative modes of travel; reduces vehicle trips and associated air quality and greenhouse gas emissions; promotes community activity, health and well-being; and contributes to the character and desirability of the Project Area as a place to live, work, recreate and invest.

The pedestrian and bicycle network provides for multiple looped routes, as well as connections to the larger citywide system. Key components of the network include:
 Class I Paths consist of shared bicycle and pedestrian paths completely separated from motor vehicle traffic. Class 1 path connections are provided within parks, paseos and open space areas. Connections are included to the existing City bike trail along the South Branch of Pleasant Grove Creek. It is intended that paths within paseos will be visible and accessible from adjacent development, with a minimum of 50 percent of the paseo edge open via a single-loaded streets, open cul-de-sac heads/street terminations, or other features. No paths may be located within Parcel CO-83, the City owned open space preserve, beyond those allowed by the Hewlett-Packard Preserve O&M Plan, deed
restrictions, the City’s Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan, and as shown on Figure 3-13. Class I facilities are 10-foot wide and paved with lane striping and 2-foot decomposed granite/gravel shoulders on each side.
 Class IA Paths are 8-foot wide multi-use concrete pedestrian paths within the landscape corridors along arterial roadways. Class IA path connections are provided along the edges of the Project Area adjacent to Blue Oaks, Foothills and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevards.  Class II Bikeways are striped and signed one-way lanes included on all arterial and collector roadways within and adjacent to the Project Area. To increase cyclist comfort and safety, the Class II bike lanes along HP Way include enhanced pavement delineations and 2-foot wide demarcated buffers from the adjacent travel lanes.  Sidewalks are included on all improved public streets in the Project Area. Ranging from 5 to 6-feet in width, sidewalks are typically separated from the street by a landscaped parkway to create a more comfortable corridor for pedestrian mobility.

City of Roseville 3-17
 Walking Paths consist of decomposed granite recreational walking and jogging trails. Walking paths may be included within some park areas.

In addition to the above, a Pedestrian/Bicycle Connection is planned through Parcels CO-4 and CO-22 linking residential neighborhoods to the Campus Oaks Town Center. The specific design of this connection will be determined as part of the City’s review of development plans for these parcels (MPP Stage 2). Further direction is provided in the Campus Oaks Design Guidelines.

The backbone pedestrian and bicycle network including all Class I bikeway segments shown on Figure 3-13 will be constructed concurrent with other backbone infrastructure and adjacent development. Connections to the network will be required to be made from individual development projects.

Barriers (bollards, rail fence, vertical curbs, post and cable, posts, etc.) will be used along Class I paths to separate the pathways from the open space preserve (Parcel CO-83). Such barriers shall comply with the 404 permit regarding use of the preserve area, and with City design, maintenance and public safety requirements. On the Hewlett-Packard Campus, an internal pedestrian and bicycle network exists. Connections will be made from this internal system to each individual building on the Campus and to the adjacent backbone network where feasible.

To enhance internal connectivity and the convenient use of alternative transportation modes, the project proponents may explore opportunities to establish a bike share program. Bike Share programs allow users to borrow “pool” bicycles for local trips. This may include use by residents to travel to local jobs, or use by employees during the lunch hour to easily access restaurants and services. The bikes are checked out and returned to designated docking stations. Bike share programs can be funded through available grants, memberships, public-private partnerships and other mechanisms.

The bicycle and pedestrian network is illustrated on Figure 3-13. 03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-18 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

FIGURE 3-13: Pedestrian and Bicycle Network

City of Roseville 3-19

3.2.3 TRANSIT
Bus service to the Project Area will be provided by Roseville Transit with connections to Sacramento Regional Transit and Placer County Transit as demand for service occurs and as funding allows. These services will utilize the roadway system to provide local and regional transit connections for community residents and employees.

Roseville Transit provides fixed route and Dial-A-Ride services within the City, as well as fixed route commuter services between Roseville and downtown Sacramento. The fixed route local and commuter systems operate on regularly scheduled routes, with the Dial-A-Ride system providing shared ride transit service to ADA paratransit customers and the general public within the City limits.

The Project Area supports the development of bus turnouts and transit shelters along arterial and collector roadways including Blue Oaks Boulevard, Foothills Boulevard, Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard and HP Way.

Bus shelters are located near and will be conveniently connected to adjacent employment, commercial and higher density residential uses to facilitate transit use. Transit services will be extended to the Project Area as the demand for such services occur and funds are available as determined by the City.

Existing and planned bus turnouts and transit shelters are illustrated on Figure 3-14.

3.2.4 PARK and RIDE
Park and ride lots provide parking for commuters to leave their vehicles to meet carpools, vanpools or access transit services. In the Project Area, a park and ride lot is planned within the Campus Oaks Town Center on commercial Parcel CO-41 located along Blue Oaks Boulevard. The park and ride facility will include twenty (20) park and ride spaces of which two spaces will provide electric car charging stations.

The park and ride lot is intended to be made available to commuters during normal commute hours on a daily basis. Park and ride spaces will be provided in addition to the minimum required parking spaces for the project development and maintained by the project developer. Additional information regarding the obligations for the construction of the park and ride lot, including related facilities such as accessible parking and pedestrian paths and signs, is included in the Campus Oaks Development Agreement.
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-20 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

FIGURE 3-14: Transit Facilities and Park & Ride Lot

City of Roseville 3-21

3.2.5 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
Transportation System Management (TSM) measures are designed to reduce the number and length of peak hour home-to-work commute trips through actions such as ridesharing, flexible work hours, and support of public transportation. Any project site, common work location, or employer with ten or more employees is required to comply with the City’s TSM Ordinance. In addition, any project site, common work location, or employer with fifty or more employees is required as a condition of project approval to prepare a TSM Plan and subsequently enter into a TSM Agreement with the City. The Plan and Agreement shall comply with the City of Roseville TSM Ordinance and shall incorporate TSM measures to the degree required by the Ordinance.

3.3 Utilities
The HPCO Master Plan identifies the backbone utility infrastructure necessary to accommodate full build-out of the Project Area. Water, recycled water, wastewater, drainage, electric, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure exist within and/or adjacent to the Project Area. Since initial adoption of the Master Plan in 1996, substantial development and associated infrastructure improvements have been constructed in the vicinity of the Project Area. The HPCO Master Plan accounts for these changed conditions to define an updated and efficient backbone utility infrastructure program. Project Area utility providers are summarized in Table 3-4.

TABLE 3-4: Utility Providers
Utility Provider
Potable Water City of Roseville
Recycled Water City of Roseville
Wastewater City of Roseville
Drainage and Flood Control City of Roseville
Electric Service City of Roseville
Natural Gas Pacific Gas and Electric
Communications AT&T, Comcast, Consolidated
Communications, and Wave
Broadband
Solid Waste Disposal City of Roseville
Adequate capacity for development of the Project Area has been/will be accounted for in the City’s infrastructure planning and, where applicable, funding programs. In general, the HPCO Master Plan land uses result in an 03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-22 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
overall reduction in utility demands when compared to the prior land uses.

Infrastructure will be constructed consistent with this Master Plan, the Project Area Utility Master Plans, then current City improvement standards, and the project Development Agreements.

3.3.1 POTABLE WATER
Water Supply and Conservation
The City of Roseville provides water service (supply, treatment, storage and conveyance) to the Project Area. The City currently uses multiple sources of water to serve customers including surface water, groundwater and recycled water. Potable water demand is typically met by surface water supplies. Surface water is obtained from Folsom Lake and the American River via contracts with the United States Bureau of Reclamation, Placer County Water Agency, and the San Juan Water District. Roseville has access to groundwater for use during an emergency, as a back-up supply during dry years, and to provide operational flexibility through implementing a conjunctive use program.

In accordance with Senate Bill 610, a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) was performed in conjunction with the HPCO Master Plan. The WSA includes an evaluation of the sufficiency of citywide water supplies over a 20-year horizon addressing the availability of adequate water supplies to meet existing and anticipated future demands, including the demand associated with the Project Area during normal, single-dry and multiple-dry years.

The Project Area’s build out potable water demand is estimated at 1,004.60 acre-feet per year (AFY). This demand includes 414.63 AFY for the Hewlett-Packard Campus and 589.97 AFY for Campus Oaks. The estimated water demand for Campus Oaks is reduced to 433.05 AFY when applying savings in potable water use resulting from implementing water conservation best management practices and the use of recycled water for irrigation. Water conservation measures to be incorporated include turf reductions and water efficient landscaping; smart irrigation controllers; and, re-circulating hot water systems for residential units. These measures were selected because they can be cost-effectively implemented and have the highest potential for achieving water saving through conservation.

Water demands for the Project Area were included in the City's 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and the City’s long-term water projections. In addition, the 2015 HPCO Master Plan (specifically the Campus Oaks land uses) results in an overall reduction in water demand of 234.95 AFY (surplus) when compared to the prior land uses. Accordingly, no additional water supplies are needed to accommodate buildout of the Project Area, nor are any improvements to the City’s water treatment plant.

City of Roseville 3-23
Backbone Potable Water Distribution System
Water is delivered to the Project Area via the City’s existing distribution system. This consists of existing and planned connection points to 12-inch and 24-inch mains within Blue Oaks Boulevard, Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard, and Foothills Boulevard. Water distribution within the Project Area includes a looped system of 12 to 16-inch backbone pipes that generally parallel collector and arterial roadways. In-tract improvements are required at a project level.

A groundwater well is planned within the Project Area (Parcel CO-76) adding to the City’s network of wells that provide back-up water supply and aquifer storage and recovery (ASR). The backbone water distribution system and well location are illustrated on Figure 3-15.

3.3.2 RECYCLED WATER
Recycled Water Use
The City of Roseville provides the Project Area with recycled water from the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plan (PGWWTP) and the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP). Both plants produce Title 22 quality effluent that is available for recycled water applications. The City currently provides recycled water to several locations on the west side of Roseville.

Campus Oaks will utilize recycled water for irrigating parks, non-residential and high density attached residential landscaping, as well as publicly landscaped areas (including roadway landscape corridors and medians). On the Hewlett-Packard Campus, recycled water may be extended to serve existing campus irrigation or other uses. Upon issuance of a building permit for any designated parcel on the Hewlett-Packard Campus, on siteimprovements that are reasonably necessary to convert landscape irrigation facilities to make use of recycle water for that parcel may be installed.

The Project Area’s annual recycled water demand is 109.33 AFY. The use of recycled water will further offset potable water demand. 03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-24 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

FIGURE 3-15: Backbone Potable Water Distribution System and Well Location

City of Roseville 3-25
Backbone Recycled Water Distribution System
A recycled water storage tank and pump station is located near the southwest corner of the Project Area. The Project Area connects to existing 16-inch and 30-inch recycled water mains located in Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard, Blue Oaks Boulevard, and Foothills Boulevard. A system of 6 to 8-inch on-site backbone recycled water lines will be constructed within street rights-of-way and easements to serve the Project Area. Included will be stubs to the landscape median in Blue Oaks Boulevard. In-tract recycled water improvements will be required at a project level.

The backbone recycled water distribution system is illustrated on Figure 3-

16. 3.3.3 WASTEWATER
Wastewater Treatment
Sanitary sewer service is provided to the Project Area by the City of Roseville. Wastewater flows from the Project Area will be directed to the PGWWTP. The Project Area is estimated to generate approximately 0.3 million gallons per day (mgd) average dry weather wastewater flow. The HPCO Master Plan (specifically the Campus Oaks land uses) results in an overall reduction in wastewater demand of 0.03 mgd when compared to the prior land uses and generation rates from the 1996 Master Plan. Capacity at the PGWWTP is adequate to accommodate projected flows.

Backbone Wastewater Collection System
Wastewater flows are conveyed to the PGWWTP by a network of existing sewer pipes ranging in size from 30-inch to 78-inches within street rightsof-way or easements. Points of connection exist or are planned to sewer pipes within Blue Oaks Boulevard, Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard, and Foothills Boulevard.

Portions of the Hewlett-Packard Campus may continue to discharge to an existing 10-inch sewer line in Foothills Boulevard that flows to the north, as per the Hewlett-Packard development agreement, or to an alternate 10-inch sewer line that flow west through Campus Oaks to the existing 42-inch wastewater transmission line in Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard. Backbone sewer collection pipes within the Project Area will range in size from 10 to 12-inches. In-tract improvements are required at a project level.

The backbone wastewater collection system is illustrated on Figure 3-17.

03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-26 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

FIGURE 3-16: Backbone Recycled Water Distribution System

City of Roseville 3-27

FIGURE 3-17: Backbone Wastewater Collection System
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-28 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

3.3.4 DRAINAGE and FLOOD CONTROL
Site Hydrology
The Project Area is within the Pleasant Grove Creek watershed located within the larger Natomas Cross Canal watershed of northwestern Placer County and southeastern Sutter County. The Pleasant Grove Creek watershed drains to the Pleasant Grove Canal, then to the Natomas Cross Canal, and ultimately to the Sacramento River.

Project Area topography is gently rolling, generally sloping from east to west and is broken into a northern drainage shed and a larger southern drainage shed. The South Branch of Pleasant Grove Creek traverses the southwest portion of the Project Area within the Open Space Preserve (Parcel CO-83) and drains the southern shed. A perennial stream, Pleasant Grove Creek flows east to west conveying storm water flows during the wet season and irrigation runoff during the dry season. Within the Project Area, the limits of the 100-year floodplain for the South Branch of Pleasant Grove Creek are fully contained within the Open Space Preserve.

An unnamed tributary to the South Branch of Pleasant Grove Creek crosses the southeastern portion of the Hewlett-Packard Campus (Parcel HP-1). A small segment of this tributary is piped under the main Hewlett-Packard loop road. The tributary then continues west crossing the southern boundary of the Hewlett-Packard Campus, returns onto the Campus within the existing employee recreation area, and ultimately connects to the South Branch of Pleasant Grove Creek within the Open Space Preserve.

Backbone Drainage Improvements
On-site backbone drainage improvements consist of a full complement of storm water quality BMP’s and a combination of conventional subsurface and surface drainage systems including an existing drainage channel adjacent to a portion of Blue Oaks Boulevard. This drainage channel will be upgraded to include a concrete pan and access ramps for future maintenance equipment. Culverts will be utilized to cross over the existing channel at street and driveway locations and will be designed to accommodate the passage of maintenance utility vehicles (bobcat front loaders). Backbone subsurface drainage includes a series of 12 to 48-inch pipes connecting to existing and planned pipes within Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard, and Foothills Boulevard. Project Area conveyance systems discharge drainage through outfalls that eventually drain to the South Branch of Pleasant Grove Creek. Drainage facilities are to be designed and constructed in conformance with City of Roseville Improvement Standards and the Placer County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s Stormwater Management Manual.

City of Roseville 3-29
Based upon the Project Area’s location within the watershed, and given that projected runoff from the Project Area will not exceed the flow rates shown on the North Roseville Specific Plan Area (Phase 1) Drainage Shed Map, no additional peak flow on-site stormwater detention is required. The Project Area will contribute toward construction of the Reason Farms Retention Basin project through payment of the Pleasant Grove Watershed Mitigation Fee. This regional stormwater retention facility provides volumetric mitigation for waters entering the Sacramento River Basin. Additional detailed drainage analysis will be required at time of improvement plan review to ensure that all City requirements are being met.

Water Quality
Best management storm water management practices consisting of site development Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and post development source control, low impact development (LID) practices, treatment, full capture trash for priority land uses, and detention will be utilized throughout the Project Area for stormwater quality treatment and hydromodification management. The intent of both site development and post construction storm water management is to minimize the adverse impacts from storm water per applicable State and Federal NPDES Permitting mandates.

Post construction source control and LID features are woven into the fabric of a community to mimic the hydrologic function of the undeveloped site by capturing, slowing, treating, and infiltrating storm water as close to the source as possible through use of decentralized small scale features.

Techniques such as tree plantings, infiltration galleries, disconnected roof drains, separated sidewalks, bio-retention facilities, rain gardens, bioswales, soil amendments, impervious surface reduction and other strategies can provide a LID “treatment train” which attempts to reproduce the predevelopment hydrologic system improving the quality and reducing the quantity of urban runoff. Additional controls such as bio-retention basins or end of the pipe treatment BMP’s when required will further treat storm water before it enters the natural drainage system.

The City of Roseville has a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, which requires hydromodification mitigation to be addressed for all new discharges to waters of the State. Hydromodification control measures are intended to mitigate the artificial acceleration of erosion and sedimentation resulting from increased runoff flows and durations associated with urbanization.

Hydromodification measures will be required to attenuate, infiltrate, and disperse increased runoff should LID measures not achieve infiltration and/or reuse runoff goals.
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-30 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
Water quality design standards shall comply with the adopted State MS4 permit requirements; the then approved City Stormwater Quality Design Manual; and, the Hewlett-Packard Preserve O&M Plan, recorded deed restrictions, and City of Roseville Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan. Sizing of volume based treatment control measures (water quality basins) shall follow the Roseville Volume Based Design Method.

Backbone drainage improvements are illustrated on Figure 3-18.

City of Roseville 3-31

FIGU RE 3-18: Backbone Drainage Improvements
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-32 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

3.3.5 DRY UTILITIES
Electric Service
Roseville Electric supplies electricity to the Project Area, with peak electric demand estimated to be 19.1 Megawatts (MW). Additional electricity resources needed to serve the Project Area, including state and federal mandated renewable electricity resources, will be purchased from outside sources or generated by City-owned facilities at the Roseville Energy Park.

As required by state regulations, Roseville Electric will use cost-efficient energy efficiency, load management and renewable resources programs to meet electricity demand before acquiring new electricity sources. It is a goal within Campus Oaks that a minimum of 50 percent of all homes be solar powered, that electric vehicle charging stations be included at all homes, and that LEED or similar green building standards be encouraged.

Electrical service is provided to the Project Area from the electric substation on the southern portion of the Hewlett-Packard Campus (Parcel RE-1) and from the Blue Oaks Substation located to the north adjacent to Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard. Underground electrical distribution will be extended to individual parcels in conjunction with roadway improvements. Included will be the undergrounding of existing overhead electrical lines along the south side of Blue Oaks Boulevard. In addition, street lighting will be provided along all public streets as part of the roadway frontage improvements. All electric and street light facilities will be constructed to the City’s standards and specifications at the time of construction.

Natural Gas
A Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) 16-inch high-pressure natural gas transmission pipeline bisects the middle of the Project Area from north to south. Natural gas will be provided by PG&E on request and in accordance with the rules and tariffs of the California Public Utilities Commission. Service will be provided via the extension of existing gas lines within and adjacent to the Project Area. Delivery of gas service to individual projects will be reviewed by PG&E at the time of proposal.

Voice/Data Communication
The Project Area is within the service areas of AT&T, Comcast, Consolidated Communications (formerly Surewest), and Wave Broadband. Together, these providers offer both voice and data communication services.

Distribution lines to individual parcels will be extended from existing infrastructure within and adjacent to the Project Area. The providers will review delivery of services to individual projects at the time of proposal. All telecommunication lines and associated facilities will be installed underground.

City of Roseville 3-33

3.3.6 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
Solid waste collection for the Hewlett-Packard Campus is provided through a private solid waste hauling service. Should this service be terminated, the City of Roseville will make municipal solid waste hauling service available to all or a portion of the Campus. The City will provide solid waste services to Campus Oaks.

Solid waste is collected and delivered to the Western Placer Waste Management Authority facility located north of the City at the intersections of Athens Avenue and Fiddyment Roads. The Authority owns a Material Recovery Facility (MRF) that receives, separates or processes, and then markets recyclable materials removed from the waste stream. Residual waste is transferred to the Authority’s Western Regional Sanitary Landfill for disposal.

At full buildout, the Project Area is anticipated to generate approximately 7,020.49 tons of solid waste annually. Campus Oaks will contribute 4,020.00 tons of solid waste per year, and the Hewlett-Packard Campus 3,000.49 tons per year. The Project Area’s solid waste contribution will not reduce the life of the landfill or operational capacity of the MRF at buildout.

Development within the Project Area will work with the City to maximize recycling and other programs to reduce or divert the solid waste stream to the landfill in compliance with AB 939.
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-34 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

3.4 Parks, Schools and
Libraries

3.4.1 PARKS & OPEN SPACE
The HPCO Master Plan incorporates an
interconnected network of accessible public
parks, paseos, and open space areas to support
recreational activities, encourage community
interaction, expand trail connections, preserve
sensitive resources and enhance sense of place.

Park and open space facilities are provided within
both the Hewlett-Packard Campus and Campus
Oaks to meet the active/formal/programmable
and passive/informal/self-directed recreational
needs of residents and employees.

City Parks & Recreation Requirements
Roseville’s General Plan requires new
development to provide nine acres of public
parkland for every 1,000 residents. This
requirement is satisfied through three land
dedication components: three acres each of
neighborhood park, citywide park and open space.

The City maintains flexibility in applying the above
standards to best meet the parks and recreation
needs of the community.

The 948 dwelling units within Campus Oaks will
generate an estimated population of 2,474
residents based on an average of 2.61 persons
per household. In accordance with the General
Plan, 22.3 acres of credited parkland is required
based upon 7.43 acres each of neighborhood
park, citywide park and open space. The HPCO
Master Plan provides for a total of 66.74 net acres
of parks and open space (including the City open
space preserve), of which 41.35 acres of credit
are granted. As summarized in Table 3-5,
neighborhood and citywide parks are granted full
credit, and open space partial credit, based upon
their differing recreational contributions to the
community consistent with General Plan policy.

Table 3-6 summarizes how the HPCO Master Plan satisfies the City’s parkland dedication requirements.

City of Roseville 3-35
TABLE 3-5: Park and Open Space Credit
Parcel Total Net
Acreage1
Credit
Ratio
Credited
Acreage

NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
CO-612
C0-622
C0-642 & HP-24(portion of)
Sub-Total

5.04 ac

2.62 ac

2.16 ac3

9.82 ac
1:1
1:1
1:1

5.04 ac

2.62 ac

2.16 ac2

9.82 ac

CITYWIDE PARK
C0-642 & HP-24 (portion of)
Sub-Total

8.38 ac5

8.38 ac
1:1 8.38 ac4

8.38 ac
PASEO
CO-632 (Paseo)
CO-652 (Paseo)
Sub-Total

0.84 ac

1.35 ac

2.19 ac
0:1
0:1
0 ac.
0 ac
0ac

OPEN SPACE
CO-812 (Open Space)
C0-822 (Open Space)
C0-832 (Open Space)
Sub-Total

0.84ac

0.86 ac

44.65 ac

46.35 ac

0.5:1

0.42 ac

0.43 ac

22.33 ac

23.15 ac
TOTAL 66.74 ac 41.35 ac

1. Acreage excludes adjacent roadways inside curb.

2. See Table 5-2 for parcel specific land use information.

3. Includes planned open turf play, tot lot, plaza seating/game tables, small seating area, and landscaping/walkways/plazas.

4. Parcel HP-2 park acreage credited towards Campus Oaks. See Table 4-1 for parcel specific land use information.

5. Includes planned futsal/tennis courts (lighted), pickleball/badminton courts (lighted), dog park, ninja warrior course, basketball court (lighted), skate park, amphitheater, restrooms, parking stalls, group picnic grove, Class I path and landscaping/walkways/plazas.

TABLE 3-6: Park Credit Summary
Park Type Credited Acreage
Required
Total Acreage
Provided
Credited Acreage
Provided
Credit
Balance
Neighborhood 7.43 ac 9.82 ac 9.82 ac + 2.39 ac
Citywide 7.43 ac 8.38 ac 8.38 ac + 0.95 ac
Open Space 7.43 ac 46.35 ac 23.15 ac + 15.72 ac
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-36 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
Parks and Open Space System
Key components of the HPCO Master Plan parks and open space system are illustrated on Figure 3-19. Parks and open space lands include:

Neighborhood Parks. The Master Plan integrates two
neighborhood parks, Campus Oaks Park (Parcel CO-61) and the Park Couplet (Parcel CO-62). In addition, a portion of the Hewlett-Packard Greenway (Parcels CO-64 and HP-2) is
dedicated to neighborhood serving facilities. Totaling 9.82 net acres, the neighborhood parks support the local recreational needs of residents through incorporation of a variety of ball fields, sports courts, informal turf areas, play structures, picnic areas, pavilions and other gathering spaces.

Citywide Park. The HPCO Master Plan incorporates a citywide park, the remainder of the Hewlett-Packard Greenway.

Located between the residential uses in Campus Oaks and the employment uses on the Hewlett-Packard Campus, the
Greenway provides a unique opportunity to integrate resident and employee interactions and activity. Facilities provided could include a skate park, trail connections, a dog park, and facilities that support performance arts, farmers markets, arts and craft shows and other activities.

Paseos. The HPCO Master Plan includes 2.19 net acres of Paseos (Parcels CO-63 and CO-65). The Paseos are linear open space features that provide physical and visual linkages between uses incorporating landscaping, seating areas, trail connections and other open space elements that enhance the Area’s recreation and mobility systems.

Open Space. The HPCO Master Plan incorporates 46.35 net acres of open space including the City owned preserve (Parcel CO-83) as well as new additions adjacent to the preserve (Parcels CO-81 and CO-82). The open space lands encompass a portion of the South Branch of Pleasant Grove Creek,
natural and created wetlands, oak woodlands, and annual grasslands. The Master Plan proposes to implement existing open space preserve planned and approved trails as well as develop new trails proposed immediately adjacent to and outside the preserve boundaries (as shown in Figure 3-13).

The trails outside the preserve boundaries may include
seating and viewing areas that will increase public visibility and appreciation of the Project Area’s preserved natural resources.

City of Roseville 3-37

FIGURE 3-19: Parks and Open Space System
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-38 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
Concept plans for each park and open space site are illustrated in Figures 3-20 through 3-24. Park concept plans are subject to change based on funding or other factors. Final park designs shall be approved by the City.

In addition to public parks and open space, the Project Area contains private recreation facilities accessible to employees on the Hewlett-Packard Campus. Included are baseball fields, a pavilion and related amenities.

While these private recreation facilities supplement parks and recreation opportunities within the Project Area, they are currently not granted credit towards meeting the City’s park and open space requirements.

Active recreational areas will be designed to reduce potable water demand by providing recycled water for irrigation, limiting turf, incorporating water conserving plants, and using water efficient irrigation systems.

The funding for public park and open space facilities is assigned to residential uses (Campus Oaks). Parks, paseos and trails will be constructed through a combination of developer turn-key and City park fee programs. The open space preserve (Parcel CO-83) is already owned by the City with associated monitoring, reporting and maintenance costs currently funded by Community Facilities District Annexation 4 (CFD4). All other public parks, paseos and open space areas will be dedicated to and maintained by the City. Maintenance will be funded through the Campus Oaks Community Facilities District – Public Services (Services CFD) to the extent permitted as specified in the project Development Agreements.

City of Roseville 3-39

Note:

FIGURE 3-20: Campus Oaks Park Concept Plan (Parcel CO-61) Campus Oaks Park is envisioned as a family oriented active neighborhood park. The park’s geometrics are responsive to the sites rolling topography, with formal landscape/hardscape designs complimenting the Park Couplet to the north and Paseo to the east, and more naturalistic undulating forms as the park unfolds to the south and west towards the Open Space Preserve. A tree lined plaza with a focal point act as the southern terminus of the Park Couplet. A sticks and stones creek play area and adventure park features compliment the opportunities for creative play. The westerly edge of the park incorporates a youth soccer field and/or open turf practice area. Shade shelters and seating areas are integrated into the northern plaza. A smaller shade sail picnic area and game tables are placed at the east end overlooking the entire park. Trial connections are provided to the west and south.

NOTE: Park concept plans are subject to change based on funding or other factors. Final park designs shall be approved by the City.

LEGEND
A. Focal Point in Plaza
B. Plaza Area
C. Shade Shelters and BBQ
D. Adventure Play Features
E. Overlook
F. Youth Soccer/Practice Field
G. Plaza with Seating/Tables
H. ½ Court Basketball
I. Shrub and Groundcover Area
J. Picnic Area & Game Tables
K. Sticks and Stones Creek Play
L. Existing Swale (to Remain)
M. Accent Planting and Seating
N. Park Couplet
O. Class I Bike Path
P. Water Quality Feature
Q. Bermed Turf
R. Retaining Wall
S. Walking Path with Benches
T. Enhanced Vehicular Paving (In Street)
U. Mounded Grassy Play
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-40 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

FIGURE 3-21: Park Couplet Concept Plan (Parcel CO-62)
The 100-foot wide Park Couplet is envisioned for primarily passive neighborhood recreational uses with the potential for limited small scale activity areas. Pedestrian circulation is enhanced by a series of gathering spaces with formal connections using a central promenade within the northerly space and a dual walkway system located toward the east and west edges within the southern space. A life-size chess board along with an open turf play area provides the community with active spaces. A plaza with a specimen tree and accent plantings is located in the southern area.

Enhanced pavements, decorative fenced planters, seating areas and focal points are integrated to give this space a rich texture.

NOTE: Park concept plans are subject to change based on funding or other factors. Final park designs shall be approved by the City.

LEGEND
A. Enhanced Paving in
Roundabout
B. Roundabout Feature
Wall with Specimen
Tree
C. Focal Point with Plaza
& Seating
D. Open Green
E. Upright Vertical Tree
Canopy
F. Small Plaza with
Benches and Tables
G. Planter Feature with
Decorative Metal
fence
H. Shade Arbor
I. Enhanced Pavement
J. Accent Planting
K. Turf Area
L. Life-size Chess Board
Plaza
M. D.G. Path
N. Specimen Tree
O. Campus Oaks Park
P. Street Tree
(residential units)

City of Roseville 3-41

FIGURE 3-22: Hewlett-Packard Greenway Concept Plan (Parcels CO-64 & HP-2) The Hewlett-Packard Greenway is envisioned as a primarily active park providing for a variety of neighborhood and citywide recreational opportunities. Included are a BMX or skate park, Ninja warrior facility, open turf areas, as well as bocce, pickleball/badminton, futsal/tennis and full basketball courts. A Class I multi-use path runs the entire length of the Greenway. The intersection of the path at the east-west paseo includes a plaza area with a fruitless olive grove, picnicking, and tot lot aligned with the main entry of Hewlett-Packard. This space can accommodate performance arts, farmers markets, arts and craft shows, and other events.

The Park geometrics allow for the integration of the sites rolling terrain, with flat areas and vertical evergreen trees creating visual linkages between Hewlett-Packard and Campus Oaks. A small amphitheater and dog park are included. Focal points are created at the eastern roundabout and the termination of each
adjacent east west vehicular
access. Parking is provided along
the western edge of the site.

NOTE: Park concept plans are
subject to change based on funding
or other factors. Final park designs
shall be approved by the City.

LEGEND
A. Entry Structure and Sign Wall
B. Mounded Turf with Specimen
Trees
C. Open Turf (flat)
D. Amphitheater
E. Lighted Pickleball/Badminton
Courts
F. Lighted Futsal/Tennis Court
G. Ninja Warrior Course
H. Tot Lot
I. Plaza with Game Tables
J. Restroom
K. Bocce Courts
L. Grove and Group Picnic Area
M. Lighted Full Basketball Court
N. Picnic Structure and BBQs
O. Drought Tolerant Plantings
P. Skate or BMX Park
Q. Parking
R. Dog Park Separated by Size
S. Enhanced Paving at HP Entry
T. Class I Bike Path
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-42 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k
To Campus Oaks Park
To Hewlett-Packard Greenway
FIGURE 3-23: Paseo Concept Plan (Parcel CO-63)
Two Paseos are included within Campus Oaks, one
providing a connection adjacent to the Open Space
Preserve and up to Crimson Ridge Drive, and the other
creating a link between Campus Oaks Park and the
Hewlett-Packard Greenway. Both Paseos include Class
I multi-use paths and select passive use elements. The
Paseo adjacent to the Open Space Preserve will have
an informal character, integrating natural grades and
incorporating native plant materials transitioning to
the open space. The Paseo linking Campus Oaks Park
and the Hewlett-Packard Greenway will incorporate
more formal landscaping incorporating elements such
as arbors and seating areas. Tree alleys will be used to enhance visual linkages between the parks, as well as
to frame the physical and visual connection between
Hewlett-Packard and Campus Oaks. It is intended that
the paseos will be visible and accessible from
adjacent development, with a minimum of 50 percent
of the edge of each paseo open via single-loaded
streets, open cul-de-sac heads/street terminations, or
other features.

NOTE: Park concept plans are subject to change
based on funding or other factors. Final park designs
shall be approved by the City.

LEGEND
A. Arbor Structure Seating
B. Small Seating Area
C. Evergreen Tree Alley
D. Seating Area
E. Open Green Space
F. Specimen Tree
G. Enhanced Paving (In
Street)
H. Deciduous Tree Alley
I. Vertical Evergreen
Accent Trees

City of Roseville 3-43
FIGURE 3-24: Open Space Preserve Concept Plan (Parcels CO-81, CO-82 & CO-83) The Open Space Preserve is envisioned as a passive amenity complementing the active parks within the Project Area. Nestled along the South Branch of Pleasant Grove Creek, the Preserve incorporates Oak Woodlands as well as natural and created wetland habitats. Opportunities exist to enhance community appreciation of the natural terrain, plants and animals. The City’s existing Pleasant Grove Creek Trail (Northern Section) currently is improved off of Cedar Springs Court and feeds northwesterly to Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard. The intent is to provide access from the southern end of this existing trail and the City’s planned off-site trail to the south adjacent to Woodcreek Oaks Golf Course to Campus Oaks Park at its southern boundary, and then continue eastward into the Hewlett-Packard Greenway. A new trail connection to Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard is also planned from the western end of Campus Oaks Park northwest through the planned paseo (Parcel CO-65). All activities are required to be in compliance with the Hewlett-Packard Preserve O&M Plan, deed restrictions, and the City’s Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan. Parcel CO-82 may accommodate reburial of Native American cultural artifacts that have been repatriated to the United Auburn Indian Community.

NOTE: Park concept plans are subject to change based on funding or other factors. Final park designs shall be approved by the City.

LEGEND
Class I Path (Existing)
Class I Path (Future)
Class I Path (Future by Others)
Sewer Maintenance Road
Note: Lotting plan is conceptual.
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-44 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

3.4.2 LIBRARIES
The City of Roseville operates a public library system
consisting of three individual facilities, providing print and online services to all City residents. The closest
library to the Project Area is the Martha Riley
Community Library at Mahany Park, a joint use facility
that includes a community TV studio and Utility
Exploration Center. The Project Area will offset its
contribution to library services through payment of
the City’s Public Facilities Fee.

3.4.3 SCHOOLS
The Project Area is within the boundaries of the
Roseville City School District (grades K-8) and
Roseville Joint Union High School District (grades 9-
12). The number of students generated within the
Project Area does not create sufficient demand for
new school facilities (see Table 3-7). Students will be served at existing schools including Oakmont High
School, Robert C. Cooley Middle School, and Blue
Oaks Elementary School. The High School District will
study potential enrollment boundary changes upon
future construction of the new high school within
West Roseville. Campus Oaks will enter into mutual
benefit impact fee agreements to fully mitigate school
impacts in accordance with its Development
Agreement and Funding Agreements with the school
districts.

TABLE 3-7: Student Generation
Single
Family1
Multi-Family
Detached2
Multi-Family
Attached3
Students
Generated
School
Capacity
Schools
Required

ROSEVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Grades K-5
Grades 6-8

0.3329

0.1164

0.2200

0.0776

0.1118

0.0352
186
63 600
1,000

0.31 0.06

ROSEVILLE JOINT UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Grades 9-12 0.161 0.036 0.036 63 1,800 0.05

1. Single Family = units at less than 8 dwelling units per net acre. 230 Single Family units.

2. Multi-Family detached = detached units at or above 8 dwelling units per net acre. 261 Multi-Family detached units.

3. Multi-Family attached = attached units at or above 8 dwelling units per net acre. 457 Multi-Family attached units.

City of Roseville 3-45

3.5 Public Safety

3.5.1 FIRE & EMERGENCY

SERVICES
The Roseville Fire Department (RFD) provides fire
protection, suppression, emergency medical
services, fire life and safety, along with hazardous
materials management to the Project Area. At the
time of HPCO Master Plan approval, the Project
Area was within the service district of Station #2,
located at 1398 Junction Boulevard. Fire Station
5, at 1565 Pleasant Grove Boulevard, was the
closest fire station to the project site. However,
the locations of these two existing fire stations
would not meet the national standard of response
time for emergency responders upon total build
out, which is why a new fire station is proposed.

A 2.15 acre fire station site (Station No. 8) is
designated within Campus Oaks at the southeast
corner of Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard and Painted
Desert Drive (Parcel CO-75). This site has been
located In accordance with the RFD’s risk
assessment model to meet the City’s response
times, and has been configured to allow for
efficient access, accommodate the City’s planned
facilities needs and allow flexibility for future
growth. A concept plan of the fire station site is
included as Figure 3-25. Once constructed, the
Campus Oaks station will provide first response to
the Project Area. Stations located in adjacent
portions of the City will provide interim and
secondary response.

Development within the Project Area will comply
with applicable City fire protection standards and
regulations.

3.5.2 POLICE PROTECTION
The Roseville Police Department provides primary law enforcement, crime prevention, traffic enforcement and animal control services to the Project Area. The Police Department provides all operations and patrols out of its central station located at 1051 Junction Boulevard. In addition, private security services are provided within the Hewlett-Packard Campus. Development will comply with applicable City safety and security standards.
03 PROJECT COMPONENTS
3-46 P l a n n i n g F r a m e w o r k

FIGURE 3-25: Fire Station Concept Plan (Parcel CO-75)

A BLUEPRINT COMMUNITY
Hewlett-Packard Campus
Development Plan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

City of Roseville 4-1
04 Hewlett-Packard Campus
Development Plan
The following establishes land use, zoning, infrastructure, intensity threshold, development guidelines and development review provisions for the Hewlett-Packard Campus. Covering the eastern 141.2 acres of the Project Area, the Hewlett-Packard Campus is planned for continued light industrial, private recreation and related development. A portion of the Campus is also designated for development as a City park. All development projects within the Hewlett-Packard Campus will be reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with applicable Master Plan, General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Development Agreement requirements.

4.1 Land Use and Zoning
The Hewlett-Packard Campus is partially developed with existing light industrial and office uses, along with parking lots, internal roadways, private recreation facilities, and a Roseville Electric substation. Capacity exists for additional development on vacant properties within the Campus, as well as potential intensification of existing buildings/uses. At buildout, total development on the Hewlett-Packard Campus is estimated to support approximately 1,200,000 square feet of Light Industrial use, as well as 8.7 acres of City park.

Land uses for the Hewlett-Packard Campus are summarized in Table 4-1 and reflected on Figure 4-1. The overall square footage allocation reflected on Table 4-1 is vested with the Hewlett-Packard property, as further regulated by the intensity threshold allocations described in Section 4.3 and the Hewlett-Packard Development Agreement. 04 HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS
4-2 Development Plan
TABLE 4-1: Hewlett-Packard Campus Land Use and Square Footage Allocations Parcel Land Use Gross Acres
Building Square Feet (sf)

Existing Future
Total
Allocation
FAR
Range
Avg.

FAR
HP-1
HP-2
HP-3
HP-4
RE-1
Light Industrial (LI)
Park & Recreation (P/R)
Light Industrial (LI)
Light Industrial (LI)
Public (P/QP)
Backbone Roads
114.00 ac

8.70 ac2

13.23 ac

2.01 ac

0.50 ac

2.76 ac
593,8201 sf 564,000 sf
42,180 sf
1,157,820 sf
42,180 sf
20-50%
20-50%
23%
7%
TOTAL 141.20 ac 593,820 sf 606,180 sf 1,200,000 sf 21%

1. Existing development consists of Buildings R3 (126,220 sf), R4 (131,190 sf), R5 (158,760 sf) and R6 (177,650 sf).

2. Parcel HP-2 park acreage credited towards Campus Oaks. See Table 3-5.

City of Roseville 4-3

FIGURE 4-1: Hewlett-Packard Campus Land Use Diagram
04 HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS
4-4 Development Plan

4.1.1 SPECIFIC DESIGNATIONS & DISTRICTS
With the exception of the Roseville Electric Substation, all properties within the Hewlett-Packard Campus are designated with either the Light Industrial/Special Area Overlay (M-1/SA) or Parks & Recreation (PR) zoning district. Permitted uses within the PR District are consistent with the City’s Zoning Ordinance general district regulations.

Permitted uses within the M1/SA District are modified from the Zoning Ordinance by the provisions of the Special Area Overlay District. This overlay allows for modification of the underlying general district regulations (including both permitted use types and development standards) to meet the unique needs of the site. This Master Plan contains all modifications to the general district regulations and is incorporated into the ordinance establishing the M1/SA District for the Hewlett-Packard Campus.

Use types listed in the Master Plan M1/SA and PR districts are defined in Section 19.08 of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance.

Hewlett Packard Campus

City of Roseville 4-5

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Land Use Designation
Light Industrial (LI)
Zoning District
Light Industrial-Special Area Overlay (M1/SA)
Purpose
The M1/SA district is applied to the majority of the Hewlett-Packard Campus. This district identifies areas appropriate for industrial and related uses such as manufacturing, processing, assembly, high technology, research and development, office, and storage uses. These uses are intended to be compatible operating in relatively close proximity to adjacent commercial and residential uses.

Permitted Uses
Table 4-2 identifies the permitted M1/SA use types and required approvals. Use types identified as principally permitted are subject only to the streamlined review and approval requirements contained in Section

4.5 of this Master Plan. Use types identified as administratively or conditionally permitted also require approval of an Administrative or Conditional Use Permit as specified in Article V of the Zoning Ordinance.

Use types not listed as principally, administratively or conditionally permitted are prohibited.

The M1/SA district modifies permitted use types to limit those that have the potential to conflict with internal or adjacent uses, and/or are considered inconsistent with the desired campus character of the project.

In general, all permitted industrial and transportation and communication use types have been retained. The use types permitted within the M1/SA District do not include outdoor manufacturing, but may include limited outdoor storage and the emission of a limited amount of noise, vibration, odor, dust, smoke, light, or other pollutants. Truck and other vehicle storage related to the primary industrial activity is permitted in designated storage areas. Uses prohibited include some civic, all residential and several commercial use types.

Development Standards and Design Guidelines
As specified in Section 4.4 of this Master Plan. If a development standard is not specifically addressed in Section 4.4, it shall be governed by the applicable standards in Chapter 19.14 of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance or as established through Site Review approval pursuant to the Development Approval Process, Section 4.5. 04 HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS
4-6 Development Plan
TABLE 4-2: Light Industrial/Special Area Overlay (M1/SA) Permitted Uses Use Type M1/SA Use Type M1/SA
Agricultural and Open Space Use Types Industrial Use Types Agricultural P Day Care Center (employees only) A
Resource Protection & Restoration P Equipment & Material Storage Yards CUP Resource Related Recreation P General Industrial CUP
Civic Use Types Hazardous Materials Handling CUP
Community Assembly CUP Light Manufacturing P
Community Services P Recycling, Scrap, Dismantling (Enclosed) P Essential Services P Research Services P
Public Parking Services P Specialized Industrial CUP
Commercial Use Types Wholesale and Distribution
Automotive & Equipment Light P
Automotive Rentals P Heavy A
Commercial Parking P Transportation & Communication Use Types Broadcasting & Recording Studios P Antennas & Communication Facilities I & II P Business Support Services P Heliport CUP
Commercial Recreation Intermodal Facilities P
Indoor Sports & Recreation P
Outdoor Entertainment P M1/SA Light Industrial/Special Area Overlay Outdoor Sports & Recreation P P Principally Permitted
Offices, Professional P A Administratively Permitted
Personal Services A CUP Conditionally Permitted
Specialized Education & Training
Vocational Schools P
Specialty Schools P
Storage, Personal Storage Facility A

City of Roseville 4-7

PARK & RECREATION
Land Use Designation
Park & Recreation (P/R)
Zoning District
Park & Recreation (PR)
Purpose
The Park and Recreation (P/R) district is applied to Parcel HP-2 which, in combination with adjacent Parcel CO-64, is planned as the Hewlett-Packard Greenway park. While within the Hewlett-Packard Campus, the development of Parcel HP-2 will be led by Campus Oaks in coordination with the City and Hewlett-Packard.

Located between the employment uses on the Hewlett-Packard Campus and residential uses in Campus Oaks, the Hewlett-Packard Greenway provides a unique opportunity to integrate resident and employee interactions and activity. Facilities that may be provided include a skate park, dog park, trail connections, and facilities that support performance arts, farmers markets, arts and craft shows and other activities.

Parcel HP-2 will be dedicated to and maintained by the City. Maintenance will be funded through a Community Facilities District – Public Services (Services CFD) to the extent permitted. Park credit will be applied to Campus Oaks (see Table 3-5).

Permitted Uses
As specified in Chapter 19.16 of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance.

Development Standards and Design Guidelines
As specified in Chapter 19.16 of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and Section 3.4.1. of this Master Plan. 04 HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS
4-8 Development Plan

4.2 Infrastructure Components
Backbone mobility and utility systems are described in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of this Master Plan. Included are provisions for roadways, the pedestrian and bicycle network, transit, potable water, recycled water, wastewater, drainage and flood control, electric, natural gas, voice/data communication and solid waste disposal. All proposed development projects within the Hewlett-Packard Campus will be reviewed to ensure compliance with the infrastructure and sequencing provisions described in this Master Plan, then current City improvement standards, and the project Development Agreement(s).

As development of the Hewlett-Packard Campus has occurred, much of the infrastructure required to support Campus development has already been constructed. Each component of the infrastructure system is designed/ constructed to accommodate development anticipated at buildout of the Project Area. For the Hewlett-Packard Campus, anticipated development is based on the square footage allocation defined in Sections 4.1 and 4.3.

Parcel specific improvements will continue to be constructed over time to coincide with the construction of the individual buildings within the HewlettPackard Campus. When an individual development project is submitted for City review, each infrastructure component will be evaluated for adequacy to serve the proposed project and for compatibility with the overall system, as outlined in the Hewlett-Packard Development Agreement.

Since the infrastructure components may be constructed incrementally, individual permits may be conditioned to require improvements needed to build an additional connection to directly serve an individual building.

City of Roseville 4-9

4.3 Intensity Thresholds
The following identifies buildout traffic and utility demand thresholds and monitoring provisions for new development within the Hewlett-Packard Campus. These thresholds apply to Hewlett-Packard’s parcels with designated Light Industrial land use, and exclude park parcel HP-2. The thresholds affect infrastructure and environmental analysis needs, as well as the ultimate limits of development. All proposed development projects within the Hewlett-Packard Campus will be reviewed to ensure compliance with the identified thresholds.

4.3.1 BUILDOUT INTENSITY THRESHOLDS
Buildout square footage estimates have been generated for new development within the Hewlett-Packard Campus (See Table 4-1). The projected square footage or acreage, as appropriate, has been multiplied by generation/demand factors for each of the key service/infrastructure components to identify buildout needs. For the purposes of this Master Plan, these key components include traffic, water, wastewater and electricity. The generation/demand factors utilized are a combination of standard demand rates and actual rates based on existing site development at the time of initial Master Plan approval (1996), as well as the thresholds identified in the project Development Agreement(s).

While the square footage estimates provide a general base for monitoring purposes, it is the traffic and utility demand factors that dictate the buildout development thresholds and infrastructure/service requirements for the project. Inconsistency with the thresholds could modify infrastructure and resource needs, as well as trigger the requirement for additional environmental analysis.

Table 4-3 provides the projected generation/demand factors and buildout intensity thresholds for development within the Hewlett-Packard Campus.

These intensities are vested and run with the property. Any unused square footage and intensity assigned to the Hewlett-Packard Campus shall revert to the City upon termination of the project Development Agreement.

The City, at its discretion, may allocate any unused intensity elsewhere within the larger Master Plan Area.
04 HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS
4-10 Development Plan
TABLE 4-3: Estimated Buildout Intensity Threshold Allocations

Light
Ind.

Gross
Acres
Light Ind.

Gross
Square
Feet
Traffic Water Wastewater Electric
Trip Rate
(Total PM
Peak Hour
trips per
1,000 sf)
PM Peak
Hour
Trips
Demand
Factor
(gallons/
day/acre)
Max
Daily
Demand
Demand
Factor
(gallons/
day/acre
Peak
Daily
Flow
Demand
Factor
(MW/
acre)
Peak
Annual
Demand
Hewlett-Packard 129.24 ac 1,200,000 sf 1.141 1,368 trips 2,5982 0.67 mgd 1,7003 0.63 mgd 0.0794 8.08 MW

1. Standard Light Industrial trip rates have been adjusted upwards based on actual traffic counts of existing Hewlett-Packard development (10/95).

1. Standard Light Industrial water demand factors and a max day factor of 2.0.

2. Standard Light Industrial wastewater generation factors with a factor of safety of 2.0 and Peaking Factor of 2.85.

4. Standard Light Industrial electricity demand factor has been adjusted upwards to reflect existing and anticipated demand.

4.3.2 THRESHOLD MONITORING
As individual development projects are submitted, project square footage or acreage will be multiplied by the average generation/demand factors and monitored to ensure that it falls within the cumulative thresholds for new development within the Hewlett-Packard Campus as identified on Table 4-3.

It is recognized that the generation/demand factors are averages. Development projects may be above or below the average factor depending on the composition and operations of the uses proposed. It is also recognized that, over time, the mix of uses may vary and shift. The average factors take into account a general mix of uses and, in most cases, should provide an adequate overall long-term measure of project generation/demand rates and impacts.

Should a development project be proposed that has an unusually high generation/demand rate, additional analysis may be required. This analysis will include consideration of cumulative demand within the HewlettPackard Campus. If monitoring indicates that actual cumulative factors are above or below the estimated averages included on Table 4-3, these average factors may be adjusted subject to City approval.

Development projects that place a higher than anticipated demand on service capacity could result in attaining a particular service threshold prior to reaching the total anticipated buildout square footage. This could impact improvement needs or limit the projected square footage of development. Conversely, uses that place a lower demand than anticipated on service capacity could result in excess capacity or the ability to develop square footage over and above estimated buildout levels.

While it is not possible to predict the specific operational characteristics of each circumstance, the following general parameters can be used as a guide to help identify when additional analysis may be required. Actual determinations and specific analysis requirements will be made by the City on a case by case basis as development projects are submitted.

City of Roseville 4-11
Traffic
Additional short term site specific traffic analysis may be required for all new development of the project site. Long term analysis may be required when a development project’s total PM peak hour traffic generation exceeds the total allocated threshold (Table 4-3) trip generation based on the average PM trip rate for the combined site by 50 trips or more. When determining whether a short or long term traffic study is required, the City shall consider the following criteria:
 Roadway volumes on streets adjacent to the Project Area;  Impacts to local or other signalized intersections;
 Existing and projected levels of service at site access points;  Existing and projected queue lengths at driveways, right turn lanes and left turn pockets; and
 Impacts to safe and efficient traffic operations.

When a traffic study is required, the analysis shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
 Ingress and egress queue lengths at existing and proposed security gates (if applicable);
 Level of service determinations at select intersections;  Levels of service at existing and proposed access points;  Roadway volumes on streets adjacent to the site and other local roadways that may be affected;
 Estimated trip generation rates;
 A comparison to the traffic analysis in the Master Plan EIR, subsequent Master Plan Addendum, and City’s Capital
Improvement Program; and,
 Impacts on required improvements including the timing of planned improvements.

The traffic study shall identify mitigation measures that can be implemented by the landowner to achieve General Plan levels of service and efficient circulation on roadways in the vicinity of the Project Area.

Water/Wastewater
Additional analysis and/or information regarding the water and wastewater service requirements of a proposed project may be required when any of the following occur:
 A proposed development project’s maximum daily water or wastewater demand exceeds the demand factor;
 A significant industrial user/discharger applies for connection to either the water or wastewater system; or,
04 HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS
4-12 Development Plan
 An industrial user proposes to locate within the Hewlett-Packard Campus with water demands of 2,598 gallons per acre per day or more (average) and/or wastewater generation rates of 2,000 gallons per acre per day or more (average).

Additional water and wastewater analysis will include the following information:

Water
 Average day demand, maximum day demand, and peak hour demand;
 Hydraulic analysis of the proposed demands and their impacts to the City water distribution system; and,
 Required improvements necessary to accommodate new demands and proposed timelines for implementation.

Wastewater
 Average day demand, maximum day demand, and peak hour demand;
 Impacts of additional wastewater on collection and treatment facilities;
 Compliance with the Regional Wastewater Master Plan;
 Required improvements necessary to accommodate additional demands and timelines for implementation; and,
 Anticipated level of chemical or biological demand, and impacts to the biological processes at the wastewater treatment plant.

Electric
Additional analysis and/or information regarding the electric service requirements of a proposed project may be required when any of the following occurs:
 A proposed development project’s total annual electric demand exceeds the peak demand of the prior year by 5% or more; or,  Unique or unusual reliability requirements are identified in the project proposal.

Additional analysis and/or information required to be submitted may include:
 Peak demand and total energy consumption;
 Timely notice and details of any special equipment or infrastructure needs;
 Reliability requirements; and,
 Cost of outage information.

City of Roseville 4-13

4.4 Development Guidelines
The following development guidelines will be applied to new development within the Hewlett-Packard Campus. A discussion of existing design guidelines is followed by a discussion of additional guidelines, standards, or conditions specific to the Hewlett-Packard Campus. All proposed development projects within the Campus will be reviewed to ensure compliance with the objectives of the applicable design guidelines and development standards.

4.4.1 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING GUIDELINES
Two existing documents contain design guidance applicable to development within the Hewlett-Packard Campus. They are:
 North Roseville Area Design Guidelines – Adopted June 22, 1992  Community Design Guidelines – Amended March 18, 2008
These documents establish design goals and provide an indication of the type of treatment that is desired. The documents address site and building design issues such as:
 Street landscape requirements
 Entry and focal points
 Buffering of adjacent residential uses
 Required setbacks
 Site grading
 Fencing and screening
 Treatment of storage, loading, and refuse collection areas  On-site circulation, parking, and access
 On-site landscaping and irrigation
 Architectural guidelines
 Signage guidelines
 Lighting guidelines

4.4.2 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS & GUIDELINES
Roadways
Cross sections and required landscaped setbacks along public roadways are specified in Section 3.2 of this Master Plan. All private roads shall be designed and constructed to City standards.

Bikeways and Pathways
Bikeways are an integral component of the existing Campus and will be extended to each new building as they develop. Bikeways will avoid truck traffic routes and other high traffic areas where feasible. Bikeways will be planned as a primary element of site circulation to provide direct access to 04 HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS
4-14 Development Plan
the primary entry of each building and employee recreation area. Security gates may be used to control access to the light industrial areas. The design of the bikeway and pedestrian security gates is an internal design consideration to be addressed by the Campus users. Where bikeways are located away from streets, but in the public right of way, they will meet the standards of a Class I bikeway as defined in the City Bikeway Master Plan.

Landscaping
The landscaping of Foothills Boulevard is addressed in the North Roseville Area Design Guidelines. Landscaping along HP Way will be coordinated with landscaping in Campus Oaks to promote consistent treatment along these roadways.

In addition to landscaping along roads, it is intended that the HewlettPackard Campus be distinguished by an internal landscaping theme. The theme includes broad canopy trees in parking areas and in the open spaces between buildings to provide shade and a distinctive character to the Campus. In addition the distinctive double rows of tall upright trees in the existing Campus may be extended to establish a strong linear form traversing the Campus to serve as a visual landmark and orientation feature.

Developed Edge Adjacent to Residential
The majority of the existing and planned light industrial uses within the Hewlett-Packard Campus are separated from planned residential uses within Campus Oaks by the Hewlett-Packard Greenway Park (Parcels CO-64 and HP-2). A small portion of the Campus (Parcel HP-3) is immediately adjacent to planned residential uses. While this portion of the Campus is currently developed with private recreational uses, the potential exists that it could be redeveloped with light industrial uses in the future.

To ensure adequate buffering should light industrial development be approved, the land use diagram (Figure 4-1) reflects a 50 foot landscape buffer on Parcel HP-3, adjacent to residential uses within Campus Oaks.

This buffer may include a solid masonry wall, dense evergreen landscaping, berming and other screening/buffering elements consistent with Sections 2.3 and 4.6.5.1 of the North Roseville Area Design Guidelines. The precise treatment of the buffer and location/orientation of development would be defined as part of the design review process for the potential future light industrial use.

City of Roseville 4-15
Developed Edge Adjacent to Open Space
The open space areas contiguous to formal landscaped or paved areas present a special condition. The transition between formal areas and open space should be visually pleasing. The formal landscaping, utilizing native materials, should provide a gentle transition by using low ground covers rather than tall, dense shrubs. A tree line is permissible, but should have an open canopy and spacing between trees that permits a view toward the open space. Dense conifers and similar massing of trees should be avoided except to frame or block a particular view. A post and cable fence will demarcate the edge of the open space area and discourage vehicle entry to the open space.

Surface run-off drainage from the landscaped areas can be detrimental to the natural conditions in the open space. Surface water will be controlled through the design of the planting, irrigation and drainage systems in the landscape areas adjacent to open space. Native, drought tolerant plants are required to limit the amount of irrigation required and to provide a transition between the natural open space areas and the more formal landscaping near buildings. Any outfalls that direct stormwater to the preserve shall comply with the Hewlett-Packard Preserve O&M Plan, deed restrictions, and the City of Roseville Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan as required by the Clean Water Act Section 404 permit, and the then applicable MS4 permit.

Conceptual Grading
Earthwork operations within the Hewlett-Packard Campus are expected to follow existing terrain. Generally, no more than an average two or three feet of cut or fill will occur within the Campus boundaries. Gentle slopes of one to two percent will be created to allow for adequate drainage improvements and still allow for minor grading at level building pad sites.

Private road grades within the existing Campus are constructed with less than a three percent centerline gradient. All proposed drives are planned to continue this standard. Minor changes in the standard may occur to accommodate local drainage conditions.
04 HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS
4-16 Development Plan

4.5 Streamlined Development Review
Process
Measures have been incorporated into the HPCO Master Plan to allow for a streamlined City administrative review and approval process for development projects within the Light Industrial-Special Area (M1/SA) zone district. Separate permits may be required by other agencies such as the US Army Corps of Engineers, California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, and the Air Pollution Control District (See Section 6 of this Master Plan for additional details).

4.5.1 ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT
The Administrative Design Review Permit process will be used to review and approve development of permitted uses within the M1/SA District.

Evaluation and approval of the administrative Design Review Permit will be performed in accordance with the procedures outlined in Article V of the City Zoning Ordinance and as described here.

The decision to issue an administrative Design Review Permit will be based on a determination of a development proposal’s consistency with this Master Plan. This determination shall be made by the approving authority (Development Services Director), and will be based on the following factors:
 Land Use and Zoning
 Master Plan Components
 Intensity Thresholds and Infrastructure Sequencing
 Design Guidelines and Development Standards
 EIR/Addendum Mitigation Measures
 Development Agreement Provisions

4.5.2 DIRECTOR REFERRAL
If the Development Services Director determines that the proposal is inconsistent with or gives rise to issues that were not addressed by this Master Plan, the proposed project may be referred to the Planning Commission as the appropriate approving authority.

A BLUEPRINT COMMUNITY
Campus Oaks
Development Plan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

City of Roseville 5-1
05 ampus Oaks Development Plan
The following establishes land use, zoning, design guidelines, affordable housing and density transfer provisions for Campus Oaks. Covering the western 234.53 acres of the Project Area, Campus Oaks is currently undeveloped and planned for a mix of tech/business park (LI), office, commercial, residential, park and recreation, open space and public uses. All development projects within Campus Oaks will be reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with applicable Master Plan, General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Development Agreement requirements.

5.1 Land Use and Zoning
Campus Oaks is organized as an integrated mixed use community accommodating:
 A range of new business and employment opportunities
 A diversity of comfortable, well connected and walkable neighborhoods
 A vibrant Town Center where residents, employees and passers-by can shop, eat, and meet their everyday needs
 A network of parks and open spaces that enhance community interaction, recreation, and sense of place
The inclusion of Campus Oaks within the larger Master Plan Area supports the desires of Hewlett-Packard to locate, build and operate its business within a community that provides for convenient relationships between employees and nearby housing opportunities, commercial services, and open-space and recreational amenities.

Campus Oaks land uses are summarized in Table 5-1 and illustrated on Figure 5-1. A breakdown of land use and zoning by parcel is identified in Table 5-2.
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-2 Development Plan
TABLE 5-1: Campus Oaks Land Use Summary
Land Use Gross
Acres
Dwelling Units (du) Square Feet (sf)
Allocated
Units
Density
(du/ac)
Allocated
Square Feet FAR

EMPLOYMENT AND COMMERCIAL USES
Tech/Business Park (T/BP-LI)
Business Professional (BP)
Community Commercial (CC)
Sub-Total

32.85 ac

10.54 ac

19.29 ac

62.68 ac
300,000 sf
60,000 sf
170,000 sf
530,000 sf
21%
13%
20%
19%

RESIDENTIAL USES
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
High Density Residential (HDR)
Sub-Total

44.26 ac

33.01 ac

22.06 ac

99.33 ac
230 du
261 du
457 du
948 du

5.2 du/ac

7.9 du/ac

20.7 du/ac

9.5 du/ac

PARK, OPEN SPACE & PUBLIC USES
Parks (P/R)
Paseo (P/R)
Open Space (OS)1
Public (P/QP)
Sub-Total

10.74 ac

2.25 ac

46.35 ac

2.47 ac

61.81 ac

Backbone Roads 10.71 ac
TOTAL 234.53 ac 948 du 9.5 du/ac 530,000 sf 19%

1. Includes City Open Space Preserve.

City of Roseville 5-3

FIGURE 5-1: Campus Oaks Land Use Diagram
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-4 Development Plan
TABLE 5-2: Campus Oaks Land Use and Zoning by Parcel
Parcel Zoning Gross
Acres
Dwelling Units (du) Square Feet (sf)
Allocated
Units
Density
(du/ac)
Allocated
Square Feet FAR

EMPLOYMENT AND COMMERCIAL USES
Tech/Business Park – Light Industrial (T/BP LI)
C0-51 MP/SA 15.20 ac 150,000 sf 23%
CO-52 MP/SA 17.65 ac 150,000 sf 20%
Sub-Total 32.85 ac 300,000 sf 21%
Business Professional (BP)
CO-21 BP 5.00 ac 28,000 sf 13%
C0-31 BP 5.54 ac 32,000 sf 13%
Sub-Total 10.54 ac 60,000 sf 13%
Community Commercial (CC)
C0-41 CC 13.16 ac 120,000 sf 21%
CO-42 CC 6.13 ac 50,000 sf 19%
Sub-Total 19.29 ac 170,000 sf 20%
Sub-Total Employment & Comm. 62.68 ac 530,000 sf 19%

City of Roseville 5-5
Parcel Zoning Gross
Acres
Dwelling Units (du) Square Feet (sf)
Allocated
Units
Density
(du/ac)
Allocated
Square Feet FAR
RESIDENTIAL USES (cont.)
High Density Residential (HDR)
CO-22 R3/DS 8.40 ac 210 du 25.0 du/ac
CO-23 R3/DS 8.95 ac 185 du 20.7 du/ac
CO-24a R3/DS 2.36 ac 31 du 13.1 du/ac
CO-24b R3/DS 2.35 ac 31 du 13.2 du/ac
Sub-Total 22.06 ac 457 du 20.7 du/ac
Sub-Total Residential 99.33 ac 948 du 9.5 du/ac

PARKS, OPEN SPACE & PUBLIC USES
Parks (P/R)1
C0-61 PR 5.70 ac
CO-62 PR 2.62 ac
CO-64 PR 2.42 ac
Sub-Total 10.74 ac
Paseos (P/R)
CO-63 PR (Paseo) 0.90 ac
CO-65 PR (Paseo) 1.35 ac
Sub-Total 2.25 ac
Open Space (OS)
C0-81 OS 0.84 ac
CO-82 OS 0.86 ac
CO-83 OS 44.65 ac
Sub-Total 46.35 ac
Public (P/QP)
CO-75 P/QP 2.15 ac
CO-76 P/QP 0.32 ac
Sub-Total 2.47 ac
Sub-Total Parks, OS & Public 61.81 ac
Backbone Roads 10.71 ac
TOTAL 234.53 948 du 9.1 du/ac 530,000 sf 21%

1. Parcel HP-2 park acreage credited towards Campus Oaks. See Tables 4-1 and 3-5. 05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-6 Development Plan

5.1.1 SPECIFIC LAND USE DESIGNATIONS & ZONING DISTRICTS Land uses are implemented through the zoning district applied to each parcel. This includes the select application of the Development Standard (DS) and Special Area (SA) overlay districts to customize development standards and allowed use types to address Campus Oaks’ unique opportunities and objectives.

Employment and Commercial Uses

TECH/BUSINESS PARK
(T/BP-LI)
Floor Area Ratio Range
20% to 50% gross floor area to gross site area
Land Use Description
The Tech/Business Park (T/BP-LI) land use
designation is a variant of the LI designation unique
to Campus Oaks. The intent of this district is to
enhance the ability of the Project Area to attract a
range of employment uses, including corporate
users, in a highly amenitized business park setting.

The T/BP-LI designation provides for a mix of uses
that are compatible with, and act as a transition
between, the light industrial uses on the HewlettPackard Campus and the commercial and residential uses within Campus Oaks. Allowed use
types include professional offices, light
manufacturing, research services, and light
wholesale and distribution.

Applied Zoning District
MP/SA - Industrial/Business Park/Special Area
Overlay.

Permitted Use Types
As specified in Section 5.2. The Special Area (SA)
overlay district has been applied to ensure a
compatible mix of employment generating uses.

Development Standards
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance
and the Campus Oaks Design Guidelines (Section

5.4).

Design Guidelines
As specified in the Community Design Guidelines
and the Campus Oaks Design Guidelines.

City of Roseville 5-7

COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
(CC)
Floor Area Ratio Range
20% to 40% gross floor area to gross site area
Land Use Description
The Community Commercial (CC) land use
designation provides a broad range of retail goods
and services to meet resident’s and employee’s
daily needs. Uses may include grocery stores,
restaurants, entertainment venues, retail sales,
lodging and personal services. All CC uses are
located within the Campus Oaks Town Center.

Oriented along both sides of HP Way at Blue Oaks
Boulevard, the CC uses help to create an entry into
the Project Area.

Applied Zoning District
CC – Community Commercial.

Permitted Use Types
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance.

Development Standards
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance.

Design Guidelines
As specified in the Community Design Guidelines
and the Campus Oaks Design Guidelines (Section

5.4).

BUSINES PROFESSIONAL
(BP)
Floor Area Ratio Range
10% to 40% gross floor area to gross site area
Land Use Description
The Business Professional (BP) land use
designation provides for new employment and
service opportunities. BP uses are sited at the
southeast corner of Woodcreek Oaks and Blue
Oaks Boulevards to maximize visibility and access.

Uses may include professional offices, medical
services, and business support services. All BP
uses are located within the Campus Oaks Town
Center.

Applied Zoning District
BP – Business Professional.

Permitted Use Types
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance.

Development Standards
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance.

Design Guidelines
As specified in the Community Design Guidelines
and the Campus Oaks Design Guidelines (Section

5.4).
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-8 Development Plan
Residential Uses

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(LDR)
Density Range

0.5 to 6.9 dwelling units per gross acre
Land Use Description
The Low Density Residential (LDR) land
use designation supports detached
single-family homes on conventional and
small lots. Lot sizes typically range from
4,500 to 6,000 square feet and could be
smaller or larger depending on site
configuration/constraints and
neighborhood design upon approval by
the City. A variety of detached, singlefamily residential housing types are encouraged in this density range.

Applied Zoning Districts
R1/DS - Single Family Residential/
Development Standard Overlay; and,
RS/DS - Small Lot Residential/
Development Standard Overlay.

Permitted Use Types
As specified in the City of Roseville
Zoning Ordinance.

Development Standards
As specified in the City of Roseville
Zoning Ordinance and in Section 5.3.

The Development Standard (DS) overlay
district has been applied to all LDR uses
to allow for variation in development
standards and inspire a wide range of
innovative residential product types.

Design Guidelines
As specified in the Community Design
Guidelines and the Campus Oaks Design
Guidelines (Section 5.4).

City of Roseville 5-9

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(MDR)
Density Range

7.0 to 12.9 dwelling units per gross acre
Land Use Description
The Medium Density Residential (MDR) land use
designation accommodates both single-family
detached and attached residential units. Lot sizes
typically range from 1,500 to 4,500 square feet
and could be smaller or larger depending on site
configuration/constraints and neighborhood
design upon approval by the City. Within this
density range, a wide range of front and alley
loaded product types are encouraged including
varied small lot, court oriented, cluster, duet/halfplex and townhome designs.

Applied Zoning District
RS/DS - Small Lot Residential/ Development
Standard Overlay.

Permitted Use Types
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance.

Development Standards
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance and Section 5.3. The Development
Standard (DS) overlay district has been applied to
all MDR uses to allow for variation in development
standards and inspire a wide range of innovative
residential product types.

Design Guidelines
As specified in the Community Design Guidelines
and the Campus Oaks Design Guidelines (Section

5.4).

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(HDR)
Density Range

13.0+units per acre gross Acre
Land Use Description
The High Density Residential (HDR) land use
designation accommodates both detached and
attached residential units. Within this density
range, a wide range of front and alley loaded
product types are encouraged including varied
small lot, townhome, row house, courtyard,
apartment and condominium designs.

Applied Zoning District
R3/DS – Attached Housing /Development
Standard Overlay.

Permitted Use Types
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance.

Development Standards
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance and Section 5.3. The Development
Standard (DS) overlay district has been applied to
all HDR uses to allow for variation in development
standards and inspire a wide range of innovative
residential product types.

Design Guidelines
As specified in the Community Design Guidelines
and the Campus Oaks Design Guidelines (Section

5.4).

05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-10 Development Plan
Park, Open Space and Public Uses
PARK
(P/R)
Land Use Description
The Parks and Recreation (P/R) land
use designation is applied where
developed parks/paseos are planned.

An integrated network of accessible
active/formal/programmable and
passive/informal/self-directed
facilities is provided to support
recreational activities and social
gathering. Included are two
neighborhood parks (Campus Oaks
Park and Park Couplet), a citywide/
neighborhood park (HP Greenway) and
two improved paseos. Parks and
recreation facilities are further
described in Parks, Open Space and
Schools (Section 3.4). Land use for the
eastern portion of the HP Greenway
(Parcel HP-2) is discussed in Section

4.1.1 of this Master Plan.

Maintenance will be funded through a
Community Facilities District – Public
Services (Services CFD) to the extent
permitted.

Applied Zoning District
PR – Parks and Recreation.

Permitted Use Types
As specified in the City of Roseville
Zoning Ordinance.

Development Standards
As specified in the City of Roseville
Zoning Ordinance.

Design Guidelines
As approved by the City for individual
parks. Conceptual park plans are
shown in Sections 3.4 of this Master
Plan.

City of Roseville 5-11

OPEN SPACE
(OS)
Land Use Description
The Open Space (OS) land use designation is
applied to lands which are environmentally
sensitive or otherwise significant due to habitat,
floodplain or other natural features. Campus Oaks
incorporates the City owned Open Space Preserve
(Parcel CO-83) as well as new additions adjacent
to the Preserve (Parcels CO-81 and CO-82). The
open space encompasses a portion of the South
Branch of Pleasant Grove Creek, its associated
floodplain, natural and created wetlands, oak
woodlands, and annual grasslands. The expansion
of trails is proposed through the open space to
allow for off-site trail connections and promote
passive recreation, environmental stewardship
and education as allowed by the 404 permit.

Open space is further described in Parks, Open
Space and Schools (Section 3.4).

Applied Zoning District
OS – Open Space
Permitted Use Types
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance and as allowed by the existing 404
permit.

Development Standards
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance.

Design Guidelines
As approved by the City in compliance with
applicable deed restrictions, the Hewlett-Packard
Preserve O&M Plan, and the City of Roseville Open
Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan. A
conceptual plan for the Open Space Preserve is
shown in Section 3.4 of this Master Plan.

PUBLIC
(P/QP)
Land Use Description
The Public/Quasi-Public (P/QP) land use
designation accommodates public serving uses
and facilities. Campus Oaks includes two P/QP
sites: Parcel CO-75 housing a planned fire station;
and Parcel CO-76 for a planned groundwater
pump back/blending station. The pump station is
discussed in more detail in Utilities (Section 3.3)
and the fire station (including a concept plan) in
Public Safety (Section 3.5).

Applied Zoning District
P/QP – Public/Quasi-Public
Permitted Use Types
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance.

Development Standards
As specified in the City of Roseville Zoning
Ordinance.

Design Guidelines
As approved by the City and as specified in the
Campus Oaks Design Guidelines (Section 5.4).
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-12 Development Plan

5.2 Permitted Use Types
Permitted use types within Campus Oaks are generally consistent with those allowed for by the corresponding general zone districts as defined by the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance. The exception is for the Industrial/Business Park (MP) district where the SA overlay district has been applied. The SA overlay district allows the permitted use types and development standards to be modified from those specified by the underlying general zone district.

The Industrial/Business Park/Special Area Overlay (MP/SA) district is intended to provide for a unique transitional employment center between the light industrial uses on the Hewlett-Packard Campus, and the commercial and residential uses planned within Campus Oaks. Allowed use types are refined to support new employment and business opportunities, while ensuring compatibility with adjacent uses. The MP/SA district has eliminated those use types that have the potential to conflict with adjacent uses, and/or are inconsistent with the desired business park setting.

Consistent with the City’s Zoning Code, allowed MP/SA use types will not “result in the emission of any appreciable amount of visible gasses, particulates, steam, heat odor, vibration, glare, dust, or excessive noise and can be conditioned to be compatible when operating in close proximity to commercial and residential uses”.

Table 5-3 identifies allowed use types within the Campus Oaks MP/SA district.

City of Roseville 5-13
TABLE 5-3: MP/SA Permitted Uses
Use Type MP/SA
Use Type MP/SA

Civic Use Types Printing & Publishing P
Community Assembly CUP Research Services P
Community Services P Wholesaling & Distribution, Light P Essential Services P Transportation and Communication Use Types College and University CUP Intermodal Facilities CUP
Residential Use Types Telecommunication Facilities P/A/ CUP Caretaker/Employee Housing CUP
Commercial Use Types MP/SA Industrial/Business Park/Special Area Overlay District Broadcasting/Recording Studios P P Principally Permitted Business Support Services P A Administratively Permitted Eating & Drinking Establishments CUP Conditionally Permitted Convenience P1 1. Permitted as an ancillary use to the primary T/BP-LI uses.

Offices, Professional P
Specialized Education & Training
Vocational Schools P
Specialty Schools P
Industrial Use Types
Day Care Center, Secondary (employee only) CUP
Light Manufacturing P
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-14 Development Plan

5.3 Development Standards
The DS overlay has been applied in combination with the general zone districts to all LDR, MDR and HDR land uses within Campus Oaks. The DS overlay allows the development standards (e.g., lot area, setbacks and building heights) to be modified from those specified by the underlying general zone districts. For Campus Oaks, the intent is to allow flexibility to accommodate and encourage a wide range of residential building types and innovative designs appealing to different economic and life-style segments.

Precise development standards for the Single Family Residential/ Development Standard Overlay (R1/DS), Small Lot Residential/ Development Standard Overlay (RS/DS) and Attached Housing/ Development Standard Overlay (R3/DS) districts will be established as part of the subsequent Campus Oaks Design Guidelines discussed in Section

5.4. A Design Review for Residential Subdivision (DRRS) is required for all Compact Residential Development projects at 7 dwelling units per acre and above as well as specified by the City Zoning Ordinance.

Included in this section are conceptual elevations, lot sizes and plot plans to illustrate the character and layout of potential building types that could be constructed within Campus Oaks subject to approval by the City during the DRRS and small lot tentative map stage. Figure 5-2 provides an illustrative of how the varied building types may be applied. The building types and illustratives are examples and are conceptual. It is anticipated that Campus Oaks will also accommodate additional building types.

City of Roseville 5-15

FIGURE 5-2: Campus Oaks Illustrative Plan (Conceptual Only) 05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-16 Development Plan

CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE A & LOT SIZE: Single-Family Detached Front Loaded (60’x100’) (subject to future City approvals)

City of Roseville 5-17
CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE B & LOT SIZE: Single-Family Detached Front Loaded (50’x100’) (subject to future City approvals)
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-18 Development Plan

CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE C & LOT SIZE: Single-Family Detached Front Loaded (40’x80’) (subject to future City approvals)

City of Roseville 5-19
CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE D & LOT SIZE: Single-Family Detached Alley Loaded (38’x80’) (subject to future City approvals)
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-20 Development Plan

CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE E: Cluster Motor Court

City of Roseville 5-21
CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE F: Cluster Alley Loaded
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-22 Development Plan

CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE G: Townhome

City of Roseville 5-23
CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE H: Townhome
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-24 Development Plan

5.4 Design Guidelines
The Campus Oaks Design Guidelines supplement the City’s Community Design Guidelines to provide a clear and common understanding of the distinct expectations for the built physical form and character of Campus Oaks. The focus is to ensure that the HPCO Planning Principles (Section 2) are meaningfully carried out and enhanced through the design, review and approval of individual development projects.

The Campus Oaks Design Guidelines will be prepared separately as a companion document to this Master Plan. The Guidelines are required to be approved by the City prior to or concurrent with the processing of the first project level planning entitlements for Campus Oaks (e.g. small lot map, Design Review for Residential Subdivision, Design Review Permit). As a companion implementation tool, the Guidelines may be adopted, and subsequently updated as appropriate, without the need to amend this Master Plan.

Topics to be addressed by the Campus Oaks Design Guidelines may include, but are not limited to:
 Residential Development Standards;
 Landscaping and Streetscapes;
 Gateways and Entry Features;
 Walls and Fences;
 Edge Treatments;
 Lighting;
 Neighborhood/Subdivision Design;
 Town Center Design;
 Employment Center Design;
 Site Planning and Circulation;
 Architecture, Orientation and Massing;
 Screening;
 Public Spaces;
 Pedestrian and Bicycle Amenities, including cross-sections of the trail adjacent to Parcel CO-7 and Parcel CO-83 and direction for the Pedestrian/Bicycle Connection across Parcels CO-4 and CO-22;  Sustainable/Green Design Features; and
 Grading and LID, storm water treatment, and Hydro modification features.

City of Roseville 5-25

5.5 Affordable Housing
The City of Roseville General Plan Housing Element establishes a citywide goal to provide decent, safe, adequate and affordable housing in sufficient quantities for all economic segments of the community. In an attempt to maximize efforts to meet affordable housing needs and to provide a mechanism whereby the City, property owners, and business community can actively work together in developing new affordable housing, the City’s Housing Element specifies an Affordable Housing Goal of ten percent (10%) of all new housing units in the City be affordable to middle-, low- and verylow income households.

Housing affordability is based on household income categories defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). These five income categories are used for comparative purposes and are based on a percentage of the county median income, adjusted for household size.

Based on sales and rental prices, and the definition of affordability, the City’s Housing Element identifies housing assistance needs for each income group.

The City recognizes that the various factors which determine affordability continually change, and project specific affordability standards need to be established and adjusted as development occurs. To that end, the 10% affordable housing goal for Campus Oaks will be based on the actual number of residential units mapped/approved.

5.5.1 AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM
Consistent with the General Plan affordable housing goal, over 10% of the units in Campus Oaks have been designated for affordable housing. This includes a mix of purchase housing affordable to middle-income households, and rental housing affordable to very low-income households pursuant to the provisions of the Campus Oaks Development Agreement.

The City’s General Plan policy specifies that twenty percent (20%) of the affordable housing goal will be available to middle-income households, forty percent (40%) to low-income households and forty percent (40%) to very low-income households. Campus Oaks’ affordable housing goal is summarized in Table 5-4.

Variations in affordable housing ratios may be approved through a Development Agreement where the following criteria are met:
a. A need has been identified for a specific affordable housing type (very low, low or middle-income) and the project meets this need; b. The project does not rely on or obtain City subsidies; and

DEFINITION OF HOUSEHOLD

INCOME CATEGORIES
Very Low
Less than 50% of Median
Low
50% to 80% of Median
Middle Income
80% to 100% of Median
Moderate Income
100% to 120% of Median
Above Moderate Income
120%+ of Median
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-26 Development Plan
c. Units proposed within this criteria would allow for individuals to stay within their units as their future income grows.

In Campus Oaks a unique opportunity has been created to provide for very low-income rental housing in excess of the General Plan goal through the use of low income housing tax credits with no City obligation to provide a subsidy. The California low income housing tax credit program requires such units to remain affordable for a period of 55 years. Variations in affordable housing ratios have been approved for Campus Oaks and the very lowincome rental units will be credited towards meeting both the very-low and low-income portions of the General Plan affordable housing goal.

The affordable housing units within Campus Oaks have been allocated to specific MDR and HDR residential parcels as identified in Table 5-5, with designated parcels reflected on Figure 5-3. Affordable units have been positioned in close proximity to the Campus Oaks Town Center.

TABLE 5-4: Campus Oaks Affordable Housing Goal
Total Campus Oaks Units 948 du
10% Affordable Housing Goal 95 du
40% of Goal Very Low-Income1 38 du
40% of Goal Low-Income 38 du
20% of Goal Middle-Income 19 du

1. To be credited towards meeting both the very-low and low-income portions of the General Plan affordable housing goal.

TABLE 5-5: Campus Oaks Affordable Housing Allocation by Parcel Parcel Land Use Total Units
Very
Low-Income
Rental
Middle-Income
Purchase
CO-5 MDR 46 du 19 du
CO-22 HDR 205 du 45 du
CO-23 HDR 190 du 42 du
TOTAL 87 du1 19 du

1. Some or all of the extra very-low income rental units may be applied against the middle income affordable housing requirement subject to City approval in accordance with the Campus Oaks Development Agreement.

City of Roseville 5-27
FIGURE 5-3: Affordable Housing Sites
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-28 Development Plan

5.5.2 ADMINISTRATION & IMPLEMENTATION
Residential builders are encouraged to explore creative approaches in providing a range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of middle-, low-, and very-low income households. Over time, housing markets, income categories, funding programs, and other factors change, and it is important to retain some level of flexibility to ensure affordable housing goals are achieved.

The options outlined below may be considered to assist in achieving the Campus Oaks affordable housing goal.

Transfers and Credits
Subject to approval by the Director of the City’s Housing Division or designee, the affordable housing allocations identified on Table 5-5 may be transferred among parcels within Campus Oaks. In addition, to the extent the number of affordable units produced on a parcel exceeds the number of affordable units allocated to the parcel, the excess units may be credited toward meeting the affordable housing goal assigned to other parcels.

Transfer and/or credits may be approved by the Director of the City’s Housing Division or designee without the need for amendments to this Master Plan or related Affordable Housing Agreement (or substitute form as specified by the City) if it is determined that:

1. The transfers/credits are applied to parcels within Campus Oaks covered by the same Development Agreement; and

2. The transfers/credits improve the ability to produce affordable units and achieve the Campus Oaks’ affordable housing goal.

3. The transfer does not cause a change to the land use designation of a large lot parcel.

Requests for transfers and/or credits shall include information as deemed necessary by the City to ensure consistency with Campus Oak’s affordable housing program. In addition, a revised affordable housing allocation (Table 5-5) shall be provided reflecting the adjusted affordable unit allocations.

The City’s Housing Division shall maintain all revisions to Table 5-5 as the official Campus Oaks affordable housing allocation record. The affordable housing unit transfer shall be memorialized with a recorded Memorandum of Understanding (or substitute form as specified by the City).

Density Bonus
The City may, in accordance with its Density Bonus Ordinance (Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 19.28) assign additional residential units to projects for

City of Roseville 5-29
the purpose of achieving the affordable housing goal. The increase in units provided by a density bonus is intended to reduce average per unit development costs.

A density bonus is implemented by City approval of an Affordable Housing Agreement (or substitute form as specified by the City) to individual projects on a case-by-case basis, and may constitute a portion of the subsidy (if required) for the provision of affordable units.

In-Lieu Fee
To the extent an in-lieu affordable housing fee is adopted by the City, a portion of the affordable housing allocations identified on Table 5-5 may be satisfied with an in-lieu fee subject to approval by the Director of the City’s Housing Division or designee.

Affordable Housing Agreement
An Affordable Housing Agreement (or substitute form as specified by the City) is required for each parcel with an affordable housing allocation to detail and secure specific requirements and obligations. Separate Affordable Rental and Affordable Purchase Agreements are required for each affordable obligation. Among other provisions, the Affordable Housing Agreement will:
 Specify the number of affordable units to be reserved at each income level.
 Specify the term of the affordability obligation.
 Establish criteria and a basis for initial rent or purchase price for designated affordable units.
 Establish criteria and a basis for annual rent or purchase price increases.
 Provide the City with a mechanism to monitor actual rents and purchase prices paid.
 Identify any City or other subsidies required to assist in meeting the affordability requirement and, if applicable, the basis and terms for refunding such subsidies.

Affordable Housing Agreements require City approval prior to the issuance of building permits, or recordation of a final small lot map where a subdivision map is required, for any large-lot parcel with an affordable housing allocation. The total number of affordable units required is to be calculated based on the number of final units mapped.
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-30 Development Plan

5.6 Minor Residential Density Transfers
Campus Oaks residential land use parcels are assigned a dwelling unit allocation and associated gross land use density (see Table 5-2). These assignments were made at the time of the 2015 Master Plan Amendment based on an assessment of the constraints and opportunities of each parcel and anticipated long-term demand for various housing types. As individual residential small-lot subdivision maps and residential Design Review Permits are processed over time, a more detailed assessment of site, market, design and other conditions will occur. It is anticipated this process may result in the need or desire to adjust (reduce or increase) the number of units assigned to some large-lot residential parcels.

This Master Plan includes provisions which allow the City to approve minor residential density adjustments and permit the transfer of residential units between large lot parcels in Campus Oaks. The Development Services Director may administratively approve a residential unit transfer/density adjustment between any Campus Oaks large lot parcels provided the following conditions are satisfied:

1. The transfer and receiving parcels are located within Campus Oaks and are subject to a Development Agreement;

2. The transfer of units does not result in a change to the land use designation, specifically, the transfer does not: a) reduce the number of units from the transfer parcel below the minimum number of units allowed by the applicable land use designation; or (b) increase the number of units to the receiving parcel above the maximum number of units allowed by the applicable land use designation;

3. The transfer of units does not result in increased impacts beyond those identified in the Master Plan EIR/Master Plan Addendum and does not preclude the ability of the parcels to conform to the applicable standards or regulations contained in this Master Plan and related Development Standards and Design Guidelines;

4. The transfer of units does not adversely impact planned infrastructure, roadways, schools, or other public facilities, fee programs and assessment districts;

5. The cumulative increase or decrease in units resulting from the transfer does not change the unit allocation by more than 20% of the units to either the transfer or receiving parcel, as established at the time of the Master Plan;

City of Roseville 5-31

6. HDR units designated as affordable units may be transferred administratively until such time as they are encumbered by an Affordable Housing Rental Agreement (or other form as approved by the City); and,

7. For Parcel CO-22, unit transfers may be approved administratively provided the resulting density of the parcel does not fall below 25 dwelling units per acre.

The transfer of residential units, if consistent with the above criteria, is administrative in nature, is contemplated by and within the intent of this Master Plan and the Master Plan EIR/Master Plan Addendum, and will not require an amendment to the Master Plan, zoning, the Development Agreement(s), or the City General Plan.

To request a residential unit transfer, the owner or owners of both the transfer and receiving parcels shall submit a complete Administrative Permit application to the Development Services Director which (a) identifies the affected parcels; (b) designates the number of units being transferred; (c) provides other documentation as required by the Director to determine compliance with the above unit transfer criteria; and (d) includes a revised HPCO Land Use & Zoning by Parcel (Table 3-2) and Campus Oaks Land Use and Zoning by Parcel (Table 5-2), all reflecting the adjusted unit counts and densities. Revised Tables 3-2 and 5-2 will be the official record tracking unit allocations to each large lot residential parcel.

If the Development Services Director determines the residential unit transfer is not consistent with the above criteria, the residential unit transfer may be denied or may be referred or appealed to the Planning Commission and/or City Council for action. Any determination of consistency may, at the discretion of the Development Services Director, be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review. The applicant may request density adjustments which do not comply with the above criteria.

Such requests shall require an amendment to the Master Plan (see Section 6).

All unused units must be transferred prior to the City’s approval of the last small lot final map or Design Review Permit for any residential large lot parcel within Campus Oaks. Any units assigned to a large lot parcel which are not used by a tentative map/Design Review Permit or are not approved for transfer, shall revert to the City unit pool and landowners shall have no subsequent claim to such units.
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-32 Development Plan

5.7 Campus Oaks Phasing
Campus Oaks is structured to allow for the potential phasing of backbone infrastructure and facilities to serve development. Four potential phases, A through D, are illustrated on Figure 5-4. In general, the phasing plan is structured to ensure that the backbone improvements in each phase can support its respective development in compliance with City policies and standards, and the development in each phase can support the costs of the required improvements.

Outside of the initial backbone improvements to be installed with Phase A, the remaining phases may proceed in any sequence or combination, provided that the City determines that all the backbone infrastructure and facilities necessary to adequately serve development are/will be installed in compliance with City policies and standards. Specific infrastructure, facility and phasing requirements are described in the Campus Oaks Development Agreement and will be further evaluated with the processing of subsequent entitlement applications. This includes roadways, sewer, water, recycled water, storm drainage, dry utilities, parks, and other facilities and improvements. All in-tract sewer, storm drain, water, dry utilities, and recycled water (if applicable) will be installed as conditioned with local project entitlements.

City of Roseville 5-33
FIGURE 5-4: Potential Campus Oaks Phasing
05 CAMPUS OAKS
5-34 Development Plan
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

A BLUEPRINT COMMUNITY
Administration

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

City of Roseville 6-1
06 Administration
Implementation of the HPCO Master Plan is to be administered by the City of Roseville in accordance with the terms of this Master Plan and the applicable development agreements. The HPCO Master Plan is to be implemented consistent with all applicable City rules, regulations and policies.

6.1 Related Documents

6.1.1 CITY DOCUMENTS
General Plan
The City of Roseville General Plan serves as the long-term policy guide for the physical and economic development of the City. The City’s core values are the foundation of the General Plan and the underlying basis for its vision and direction. The HPCO Master Plan implements the goals and policies of the General Plan and supplements these goals and policies by providing specific direction to reflect conditions unique to the Project Area.

Municipal Code
The Roseville Municipal Code is one of the primary tools for implementing the General Plan. The Municipal Code includes the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, Grading Ordinance and Tree Ordinance, which are used in tandem with this Master Plan to implement the HPCO development program. Where the provisions of this Master Plan conflict with the Municipal Code, this Master Plan shall prevail.

Where the Master Plan is silent, the Municipal Code shall prevail.

Community Design Guidelines
The Community Design Guidelines establish a clear and common understanding of the City’s expectations for the planning, design, and review of development. The Community Design Guidelines work in combination with the Hewlett-Packard Campus Development Guidelines and the Campus Oaks Design Guidelines to direct Project Area 06 ADMINISTRATION
6-2 HPCO Master Plan
development. Where the provisions of this Master Plan conflict with the Community Design Guidelines, this Master Plan shall prevail. Where the Master Plan is silent, the Community Design Guidelines shall prevail.

Other Relevant City Documents
Other documents and programs to be referenced in implementing the HPCO Master Plan include, but are not limited to, the City’s Blueprint Implementation Strategies, Communitywide Sustainability Action Plan, Pedestrian Master Plan and Bicycle Master Plan.

6.1.2 MASTER PLAN DOCUMENTS
Environmental Impact Report & Addendum
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the HewlettPackard Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified with findings concurrent with initial adoption of the Master Plan (1996). The EIR evaluated the existing environmental resources within the project area, analyzed potential impacts on those resources due to the project, and identified mitigation measures as appropriate to reduce significant impacts.

The EIR examined all phases of the project including planning, construction and operation.

Concurrent with adoption of the HPCO Master Plan, an Addendum to the Hewlett-Packard Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (HPCO Addendum) was adopted (2015). The HPCO Addendum analyzed the potential environmental impacts either created by the HPCO Master Plan or resulting from changed circumstances, and determined that, with the inclusion of applicable requirements conditioned and made part of the project, the HPCO Master Plan would not give rise to any new significant effects or any substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant effects. Accordingly, the HPCO Addendum concluded that none of the conditions identified in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 were present that require preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR.

In accordance with CEQA, it is intended that the Master Plan EIR and HPCO Addendum form the environmental basis for approval of subsequent development within and in compliance with the HPCO Master Plan. Both the Master Plan EIR and HPCO Addendum incorporate Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Programs.

City of Roseville 6-3
Development Agreements
Individual landowners within the Project Area and the City of Roseville have executed project Development Agreements in accordance with Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the Government Code of California, as implemented through Article V of the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance. The Project Area Development Agreements form a binding contract between the parties establishing certain development rights and obligations. The Development Agreements secure permitted uses, needed infrastructure improvements, the timing and method of financing improvements, and other specific rights, duties and obligations of the property owners and the City as it relates to development within the Project Area.

Utility Master Plans
Utility Master Plans have been prepared for the Project Area. These Master Plans provide general direction for the construction of improvements to serve buildout of the project and may be augmented with additional studies as may be required by the City during review of subsequent entitlement requests or the review of final construction drawings. Included are the HPCO Water Master Plan, Sewer Master Plan, Recycled Water Master Plan, and Drainage Master Plan. The intent is to ensure functional and reliable utility systems (see Chapter 3 for additional detail).

6.2 Subsequent Approvals

6.2.1 CITY PROCESSING
Individual development projects within the Project Area are subject to review and approval of subsequent permits and entitlements by the City of Roseville (e.g. subdivision review, design review, conditional use permits, variances, and/or other permits). Application and processing requirements shall be in accordance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance and other regulations, unless otherwise modified by this Master Plan.

All subsequent development projects, public improvements and other activities shall be consistent with this Master Plan, accompanying Development Standards and Design Guidelines, the Development Agreements, applicable City of Roseville policies, requirements and standards, and all State and Federal permit conditions and environmental review documents (CEQA and NEPA).

In acting to approve a subsequent project or permit, the City may impose conditions as are reasonably necessary to ensure the project is in compliance with the Master Plan and all applicable plans and regulations. 06 ADMINISTRATION
6-4 HPCO Master Plan

6.2.2 STREAMLINED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Measures have been incorporated into the HPCO Master Plan to allow for a streamlined Administrative Design Review Permit process for development projects within the Light Industrial-Special Area (M1/SA) zone district within the Hewlett Packard Campus. See Section 4.5 for additional details.

6.2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Each subsequent development project shall be reviewed to ensure compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and the HPCO Addendum serve as the base environmental documents for subsequent entitlements.

Development applications will be reviewed on a project-by-project basis to determine consistency with the EIR and HPCO Addendum.

In general, if a subsequent project is determined to be consistent with the Master Plan and within the scope of the Master Plan EIR and HPCO Addendum, further environmental review may not be necessary. If it is determined that a development application is inconsistent with the Master Plan and/or outside the scope of the Master Plan EIR and HPCO Addendum, a determination will be made as to the appropriate subsequent environmental document in accordance with CEQA.

6.2.4 APPROVALS FROM OTHER AGENCIES
Other permits and approvals may be required prior to the development of individual projects by federal, state, and/or regional agencies. These agencies may include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Department of Transportation, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Placer County Air Pollution Control District, and others as applicable.

6.3 Consistency and Amendment
Process
One of the primary objectives of the Master Plan is maintaining the flexibility to react quickly to changing conditions, markets and opportunities. To achieve this, the following process is established which allows the Development Services Director to interpret Master Plan consistency and the type of Plan amendment, if any, that is required by proposed changes:

1. Substantial Conformity. The Development Services Director may make the determination that a proposed change is consistent with the intent and basic provisions of the Master Plan, and therefore in

City of Roseville 6-5
substantial conformity with the Plan. In such cases, no subsequent amendment to the HPCO Master Plan is required.

2. Minor Modification. If it is determined that a proposed change would result in a minor deviation to the HPCO Master Plan, then such modification may be approved administratively through the Administrative Permit process. Such permit shall be reviewed consistent with Article V of the Zoning Ordinance.

3. Major Modification/Amendment. When a proposed change is considered to be inconsistent with the adopted Master Plan, a subsequent amendment is required. Amendments are processed in the same manner as initial Master Plan adoption, requiring review by the Planning Commission and action by the City Council.

In reviewing Substantial Conformity and Minor Modifications to the Master Plan, the Development Services Director shall consider consistency with the intent of the Master Plan, the applicable Master Plan Development Agreement(s), the Master Plan EIR/HPCO Addendum, and the City General Plan. Any proposed change to the Master Plan may, at the discretion of the Development Services Director, be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review.
06 ADMINISTRATION
6-6 HPCO Master Plan
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
ORDINANCE NO.

ADOPTING A THIRD AMENDMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND WESTPARK S.V. 400, LLC, RELATIVE TO

THE SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. In accordance with Chapter 19.84 of Title 19 of the Roseville Municipal Code (the Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Roseville, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the City of Roseville enter into a Third Amendment of the Development Agreement by and between the City of Roseville, and Pine Island Apartments, LLC, as successor in interest to Westpark S.V. 400, LLC, pertaining to property located within the Sierra Vista Specific Plan area.

SECTION 2. The Third Amendment to Development Agreement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, as a residential project pursuant to a Specific Plan. A project is eligible for this exemption if the public agency has prepared an EIR on a specific plan after January 1, 1980, and the criteria to require a subsequent or supplemental EIR are not met. The EIR for the Sierra Vista Specific Plan (SCH #2008032115) was certified by the City Council on May 5, 2010. No significant changes to the site or new, potentially significant impacts have been identified that would require the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR, and the Development Agreement Amendment is consistent with the previously completed analysis.

SECTION 3. The Council of the City of Roseville has reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission recommending approval of the Third Amendment to Development Agreement, and makes the following findings:

1. The Third Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, programs and land use designations of the City of Roseville General Plan and the Sierra Vista Specific Plan;

2. The Third Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance;

3. The Third Amendment to the Development Agreement is in conformance with the public health, safety and welfare;

4. The Third Amendment to the Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of the property or the preservation of property values; and

5. The provisions of the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement will provide sufficient benefit to the City to justify entering into said Amendment.

SECTION 4. The Third Amendment to Development Agreement by and between the City of Roseville, Pine Island Apartments, LLC, as successor in interest to Westpark S.V. 400, LLC, a 2 copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's Department and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk is directed to record the executed Development Agreement Amendment within ten (10) days of the execution of the agreement by the City Manager with the County Recorder's Office of the County of Placer.

SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its adoption.

SECTION 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ____________ 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
___________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________
City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO.

ADOPTING A SIXTH AMENDMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND WESTPARK SIERRA VISTA, LLC, AS

ASSIGNEE OF WESTPARK FEDERICO, LLC, MOURIER INVESTMENTS, LLC, AND

FEDERICO-TYLER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RELATIVE TO THE SIERRA VISTA

SPECIFIC PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. In accordance with Chapter 19.84 of Title 19 of the Roseville Municipal Code (the Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Roseville, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the City of Roseville enter into a Sixth Amendment of the Development Agreement by and between the City of Roseville and FD34 Development, LLC, as assignee of Mourier Investments, LLC, pertaining to property located within the Sierra Vista Specific Plan area.

SECTION 2. The Sixth Amendment to Development Agreement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, as a residential project pursuant to a Specific Plan. A project is eligible for this exemption if the public agency has prepared an EIR on a specific plan after January 1, 1980, and the criteria to require a subsequent or supplemental EIR are not met. The EIR for the Sierra Vista Specific Plan (SCH #2008032115) was certified by the City Council on May 5, 2010. No significant changes to the site or new, potentially significant impacts have been identified that would require the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR, and the Development Agreement Amendment is consistent with the previously completed analysis.

SECTION 3. The Council of the City of Roseville has reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission recommending approval of the Sixth Amendment to Development Agreement, and makes the following findings:

1. The Sixth Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, programs and land use designations of the City of Roseville General Plan and the Sierra Vista Specific Plan;

2. The Sixth Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance;

3. The Sixth Amendment to the Development Agreement is in conformance with the public health, safety and welfare;

4. The Sixth Amendment to the Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of the property or the preservation of property values; and

5. The provisions of the Sixth Amendment to the Development Agreement will provide sufficient benefit to the City to justify entering into said Amendment. 2 SECTION 4. The Sixth Amendment to Development Agreement by and between the City of Roseville and FD34 Development, LLC, as assignee of Mourier Investments, LLC, a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's Department and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ____________ 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
___________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________
City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO.

ADOPTING A TENTH AMENDMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND BBC ROSEVILLE OAKS, LLC RELATIVE TO

THE CAMPUS OAKS PROPERTY WITHIN THE HEWLETT-PACKARD CAMPUS OAKS

MASTER PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. In accordance with Chapter 19.84 of Title 19 of the Roseville Municipal Code (the Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Roseville, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the City of Roseville enter into a Tenth Amendment of the Development Agreement by and between the City of Roseville and Pine Island Apartments, LLC, as successor in interest to BBC Roseville Oaks, LLC, pertaining to property located within the Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan area.

SECTION 2. The Tenth Amendment to Development Agreement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, as a residential project pursuant to a Specific Plan. A project is eligible for this exemption if the public agency has prepared an EIR on a specific plan after January 1, 1980, and the criteria to require a subsequent or supplemental EIR are not met. The EIR for the Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan (SCH #95112022) was certified by the City Council on June 5, 1996.

No significant changes to the site or new, potentially significant impacts have been identified that would require the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR, and the Development Agreement Amendment is consistent with the previously completed analysis.

SECTION 3. The Council of the City of Roseville has reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission recommending approval of the Tenth Amendment to Development Agreement, and makes the following findings:

1. The Tenth Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, programs and land use designations of the City of Roseville General Plan and the Hewlett-Packard Campus Oaks Master Plan;

2. The Tenth Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance;

3. The Tenth Amendment to the Development Agreement is in conformance with the public health, safety and welfare;

4. The Tenth Amendment to the Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of the property or the preservation of property values; and

5. The provisions of the Tenth Amendment to the Development Agreement will provide sufficient benefit to the City to justify entering into said Amendment. 2 SECTION 4. The Tenth Amendment to Development Agreement by and between the City of Roseville and Pine Island Apartments, LLC, as successor in interest to BBC Roseville Oaks, LLC, a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's Department and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ____________ 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
___________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2922
File #: 0709-03
Title:

Community Development Block Grant 2022 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report
Contact: Kristine Faelz 916-774-5451 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/20/2023
Item #: 11.5.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Receive public comment on the City of Roseville 2022 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER); and

2. Adopt a resolution approving the 2022 Program Year CAPER, and authorize the City Manager to execute necessary documents and certifications on behalf of the City of Roseville for submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.

BACKGROUND
As an entitlement jurisdiction for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, the City is required to annually review and report on the progress it has made in carrying out its Annual Action Plan and progress toward the goals identified in the 2020–2025 Consolidated Plan/Five-Year Strategic Plan. The Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) is a requirement of CDBG funding and must be submitted to HUD within 90 days of the completion of the CDBG program year (see Attachment 1).

Over the last year, the Housing Division has assisted 1,328 low-income persons, and 5 lowincome households through the use of CDBG and other housing and community development funds. During fiscal year 2022-2023, $1,826,130 from federal, state, and local funding sources was expended on housing rehabilitation, public services, affordable housing, and homeless shelter and prevention services. In this same time period, the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program (federal rental assistance program) assisted 769 households with $7,933,095 million in rental subsidies.

During the 2022 Program Year, HUD-allocated CDBG funds have benefited lower-income households in Roseville through housing rehabilitation, public services, and homeless shelter and prevention services. These funds also provide funding for Housing Division administrative expenses to manage these programs. The City received two allocations of CDBG-CV funding during the COVID-19 pandemic, used to prevent, prepare for and respond to the coronavirus. In the 2022-23 program year, 205 individuals received assistance through CDBG-CV public services programs.

The table below lists the individual activities funded by CDBG exclusively, including the amount expended and number of households assisted during Fiscal Year 2022-23.

This table lists the activities funded by the CDBG-CV allocations which have expended funds during Fiscal Year 2022-23.

The draft CAPER document is provided with this report, and includes the following:
progress information towards completion of the City's Five-Year Strategic Plan goals; a description of the resources made available towards goals; information regarding the investment of available resources; an overview of the geographic distribution and location of investments; a tally of the number of households and persons assisted; a list of actions taken to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing; an evaluation of the City’s progress in meeting affordable housing objectives; a description of the activities undertaken with CDBG funds; and a summary of progress on other actions indicated in the Five-Year Strategic Plan and Annual Action Plan.

The CAPER is available for public review during a 15-day public comment period that began on Thursday, August 31, 2023 and ends at the conclusion of this public hearing on September 20, 2023, prior to the submission deadline. Any public comments received will be included in the CAPER, with City responses, prior to its submittal to HUD for review. To date, no comments have been received.

FISCAL IMPACT
The CDBG funding is provided as a federal grant to the City. These grants are used to offset potential costs to the General Fund and to serve the community. This item does not impact the City's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The approval of the 2022 CDBG CAPER meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Kristine Faelz, Housing Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-370
Draft 2022 CAPER
RESOLUTION NO. 23-370
APPROVING THE 2022 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND

EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) 2022 CAPER TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD)
WHEREAS, the 2022 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, a 15 day review and comment period was provided; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held September 20, 2023 at which time the City Council received further public comment on the City’s progress in carrying out its strategic plan and action plan;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the 2022 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report is hereby approved; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute any necessary documents and certifications on behalf of the City of Roseville for submittal of the Community Development Block Grant 2022 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this __________ day of __________________ 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________

CITY CLERK

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)

CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
2022 CAPER

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING

DIVISION
316 VERNON STREET STE. 150
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes
Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and executed throughout the program year.

The 2022 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) constitutes the reporting period from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, the third year of the five-year 2020-2025 Consolidated Planning period. The City of Roseville received an entitlement allocation of $713,722 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the 2022 Program Year (PY). The City also received $82,074.48 in program income, carried over $603,258.76, for a total program budget of $1,399,055.24. The City expended $910,623.84 leaving a balance of $488,431.40.

Over the last year, the Housing Division has assisted 1,328 low income persons, and five low income households through the use of CDBG and other housing and community development funds. During fiscal year 2022-2023, $1,826,130 from federal, state, and local funding sources was spent for housing rehabilitation, public services, affordable housing, and homeless shelter and prevention services.

Also in the last year, the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program (federal rental assistance program) assisted 769 households with $7,933,095 million in rental subsidies. This includes regular, NED, VASH, Mainstream, Emergency Housing and Project-Based vouchers.

In the 2022 program year, CDBG has benefitted lower income households in Roseville through housing rehabilitation, public services, public facility improvements, and homeless shelter and prevention services. These funds also provide funding for Housing Division administrative expenses to manage these programs.

The City uses other Federal, State and local resources (when available), including Housing Choice Voucher Rental Assistance Contracts, Stateadministered HOME funds, and local developer contributions to address housing and community development priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan.

The CAPER identifies the programs and activities the City undertook during the 2022 PY to meet underserved needs identified in the Consolidated Plan. In addition, the CAPER discusses the actions the City took to address: lead-based paint hazards; barriers to affordable housing; the needs of households at or below the poverty level; and access to fair housing information.

CAPER 1
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CARES Act – CDBG-CV1 and CDBG-CV3
The City is including a brief update regarding CARES Act (CDBG-CV) funding and spending in the CAPER.

On March 27, 2020 the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was enacted to provide emergency assistance and health care response for individuals, families, and businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 2, 2020, HUD announced that the City would receive $417,412 of CARES Act CDBG funds, known as CDBG-CV1; on September 11, 2020, the City received notification that it would receive $795,721 of Round 3 of the CARES Act CDBG funds (CDBG-CV3). These funds must be used to prevent, prepare for and respond to COVID-19. A total of three substantial amendments were submitted to the 2019 Annual Action Plan to allocate the CV funds.

Programs implemented and completed with Round 1 of CV funding (CDBG-CV1) included:
- The Small Business Loan program: $501,585 expended of CV1 and CV3 funds (plus $204,070 Entitlement and prior year carryover funds).

The CDBG-CV Small Business Loan program assisted small businesses with loans to address the coronavirus, through the support of employee retention and reduction of job loss due to the pandemic. The City’s Small Business Loan program assisted 23 local business owners with the creation of 58 jobs, and 187 jobs retained. o Milestone Physical Therapy, $20,000 loan: the business survived closure during the COVID pandemic and the City is working to close out the loan.
o The Monk’s Cellar, $20,000 loan: retained eight full time and nine part time employees. - The Gathering Inn Shelter-in-Place program: $31,632.19 expended. The Shelter-In-Place program provided homeless individuals shelter at their facility as well as St. John's church due to COVID-19. The second site allowed for appropriate social distancing for the homeless individuals staying at the shelter. Forty-one homeless individuals were assisted with the funds for the two month period. This program was completed and reported on in the 2020 CAPER.

Two NOFA’s were released to allocate CDBG-CV3 funds. Programs implemented with CDBG-CV3 funds included:
- Project Roomkey funding support: $24,000 awarded, fully expended. The program housed approximately 60 previously homeless residents at a local hotel, in order to provide a safe and isolated environment due to COVID-19. CDBG-CV3 funds were provided to Placer County towards Project Roomkey for a total of three months. This program was completed and reported on in the 2021 CAPER; a total of CAPER 2
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
102 beneficiaries were served.
- AMI Housing Emergency Rental Assistance program: $250,000 in funding was awarded with the first NOFA for CV3 funds, $49,495.60 spent; additional funds of $200,500 awarded with the second NOFA for a total budget of $450,000. $320,483.29 expended by the end of June 2023, remaining balance of $80,021.11 will be spent by the end of the 2023/24 program year. The emergency rental assistance program has provided funding for rent and back rent to help prevent homelessness and potential evictions, while also providing families with stability during an uncertain time. So far the program has served 153 beneficiaries. - Placer County Office of Education After-School Care for Homeless Students program: $50,000 awarded, $46,701.03 expended. District staff relayed that students who fall under the McKinney Vento Act (homeless or in Foster Care) required several services due to COVID19. These services included the provision of safe, free, and consistent childcare where COVID precautions are being taken, while also supporting families who were impacted by COVID with navigating social services and assisting with accessing permanent housing.

Funding for this program is now completed with a total of 60 beneficiaries served. - Project Sentinel’s Fair Housing Services program: $50,000 awarded, fully expended. The Fair Housing Services provider has assisted Roseville residents with comprehensive fair housing services including investigation, counseling and legal referrals for victims of housing discrimination, along with community education and outreach regarding fair housing law and practices. The housing counseling agency has played a role in reducing and preventing evictions by providing Roseville residents with information on tenant rights and fair housing issues. Funding for this program is now completed with a total of 112 beneficiaries served. - KidsFirst Rent/Mortgage and Utility Assistance program: $50,000 awarded, $49,592.43 expended. The KidsFirst’s Rental/Mortgage and Utility Assistance Program provided emergency housing/shelter and utility supports for clients affected by COVID-19 impacts, such as job loss and employment reduction. KidsFirst was able to provide rental/mortgage and/or utility assistance to 28 Roseville households. 28 low-income Roseville clients, most at or below 30% AMI and from single-parent households, were able to keep their lights on and avoid eviction. Funding for this program is now completed with a total of 60 beneficiaries served.

HUD’s original deadline to spend 80% of CDBG-CV1 and CDBG-CV3 funds within three years of receipt (August 24, 2023) has been revised to require that 100% of the funds be spent by August 2026 and final spending and accomplishments data reported to HUD by November 2026. At the time of this report’s preparation, the City has expended $112,677.64 (90.7%) of CV funds, and anticipates to be on track to meet this goal.

Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual CAPER 3
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee’s program year goals.

Goal Category Source /
Amount
Indicator Unit of
Measure
Expected –
Strategic Plan
Actual –
Strategic
Plan
Percent
Complete
Expected
–
Program
Year
Actual –
Program
Year
Percent
Complete
Addressing
Homelessness
Homeless
CDBG:
$412,365.30
Public Facility or
Infrastructure
Activities for
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Households
Assisted
5 0 0.00% 18
Addressing
Homelessness
Homeless CDBG: $15,000
Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Persons
Assisted
0 65 0 15
Addressing
Homelessness
Homeless CDBG: $21,634 Homeless Person
Overnight Shelter
Persons
Assisted
1500 56 3.73% 210 50

26.67%
Provide Fair
Housing
Services
CDBG:
$16,208.08
Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Persons
Assisted
250 46

18.40%
0 46
Provision of
Services for
Low-Income
Persons
NonHomeless
Special
Needs
CDBG:
$59,999.82
CDBG-CV:
$6,107.73
Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Persons
Assisted
4000 1172

29.30%
834 1172
140.53%
CAPER 4
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Provision of
Services for
Low-Income
Persons
NonHomeless
Special
Needs
CDBG-CV:
$370,075.72
Homelessness
Prevention
Persons
Assisted
50 0 0.00% 157
Public Facilities
and
Improvements
NonHousing
Community
Developme
nt
CDBG: $0
Public Facility or
Infrastructure
Activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Persons
Assisted
4720 1 0.02% 1765 0
Rehabilitation
of Affordable
Rental Housing
Affordable
Housing CDBG: $1,855.00
Public Facility or
Infrastructure
Activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Persons
Assisted
0 73 0 73
Rehabilitation
of OwnerOccupied
Housing
Affordable
Housing
CDBG:
$249,299.32
Homeowner
Housing
Rehabilitated
Household
Housing Unit
20 5

25.00%
6 5

83.33%
Table 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified.

The City was able to address priority needs in 2022-2023, while also addressing the coronavirus pandemic, which was a high priority need.

CDBG-CV: The CV specific objectives identified in the Action Plan included the goal of preventing, preparing for and responding to COVID-19.

CAPER 5
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
One way in which the City was able to address this goal through the execution of the Small Business Loan program, where assistance was provided to eligible businesses economically impacted by COVID-19. Other programs that addressed this priority need included: The Gathering Inn Shelter-in-Place program, the AMI Housing Emergency Rental Assistance program, the Placer County Office of Education After-school Care for Homeless Students program, the Placer County Project Roomkey program, Project Sentinel’s Fair Housing Services program, and KidsFirst’s COVID rental/mortgage and utility assistance program. In the 2022-23 program year, 205 individuals received assistance through CDBG-CV public services programs.

The City improved five housing units using CDBG, addressing moderate to substantial rehabilitation needs. These housing units, occupied by lowincome, elderly and disabled persons, will be safer and have the useful life of the major systems extended.

Public services, improved public facilities, and affordable housing activities were provided to 1,328 individuals. These services meet the basic needs of low-income households, including basic nutrition, and serve to both address and prevent chronic homelessness.

The City complied with all Federal Overlay requirements for all projects and activities undertaken during the 2022 Program Year. During the 2022 PY the City:
• Continued to strengthen its relationships with private for-profit developers and non-profit housing providers to expand the availability of affordable housing and increase program efficiencies and outcomes. • Continued to participate in the Governance Committee of the “Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras” (HRCS) for the Nevada-Placer Joint Applicant and led efforts for the Placer County Continuum of Care (CoC) in its planning process on ending homelessness and efforts to improve systems through its Built for Zero policy consortium membership. HRCS and the CoC are collaborative associations of service providers and governmental agencies who work together to strengthen the delivery system by integrating and coordinating housing, homeless assistance, and supportive services.
• Participated in the Point in Time Count for South Placer, including the City of Roseville. This was in coordination with the overall HRCS effort, to gain comprehensive information about Placer County homeless individuals and families. • Continued the City’s partnership with Project Sentinel to provide fair housing services to residents of Roseville. Project Sentinel hosted outreach events, opened housing discrimination cases, and responded to calls from residents regarding fair housing rights. • Provided essential services to high need populations including homeless, seniors, disabled persons, youth, and victims of human trafficking and domestic violence.
• Provided funding for Roseville residents unable to pay their rent or utilities due to COVID related reasons, which helped prevent homelessness CAPER 6
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
and potential evictions.
• Provided funding to AMI Housing for the acquisition of a transitional housing facility, Monarch House. CDBG funds were used towards the purchase of the Monarch House home which allowed AMI Housing to continue to administer their successful program to assist low-income mentally ill persons undergoing mental health crisis.

CAPER 7
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted).

91.520(a)
CDBG
White 1,235
Black or African American 156
Asian 53
American Indian or American Native 27
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 28
American Indian/Alaskan Native & White 26
Other Multi-Racial 8
Total 1,533
Hispanic 357
Not Hispanic 1,176
Table 2 – Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds Narrative
Table 2 aggregates the beneficiaires served with both Entitlement as well as CV funds.

Race and ethnicity data is collected from all subrecipients who receive CDBG funding and provide a direct service to low/moderate income persons. Table 2 provides an aggregate of race and ethnicity data for the combined number of people, families, and households served during the program year based on accomplishment data from all CDBG activities reported in HUD’s Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS). The numbers above represent the demographic breakdown of those served through CDBG Entitlement funds specifically.

Race and origin data from the 2020 Census indicates that 15.8% of Roseville residents identify as Hispanic. Of the 15.8%, Hispanic households served among various programs included:
- 23% percent of beneficiaries served with 2022 PY CDBG entitlement funds were Hispanic; - 20% percent of households served through the Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation program (OOR) for the 2022 PY identified as Hispanic. Additionally, the waiting list for the OOR program is comprised of 33% Hispanic households;
- 16% of issued (HCV & specialty) vouchers in the 2022 PY were issued to Hispanic households.

Female Head of Households for all activities funded with Entitlement funds totaled 947 beneficiaries, while the aggregate count for people with a disability totaled 480 individuals served.

CAPER 8
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
The City allocated resources on a citywide basis. Resources targeted to the new construction of affordable housing were allocated on a citywide basis in accordance with the City's 10% Affordable Housing Goal and provide for disbursement of affordable housing throughout the City, rather than concentrated within low-income areas of the City.

Resources targeted to special needs populations were also allocated on a Citywide basis, where needs were identified and/or where resources could be coordinated with existing facilities and services.

Activities such as infrastructure improvements are targeted to low-income neighborhoods with older infrastructure most in need of assistance.

The City assigned the priority for each category of priority needs based on the overall relative need, resources received, and policies established by the City. The City will continue to pursue all available Federal, State and local resources and look to all segments of the community to assist with meeting homeless, affordable housing and community development needs. The City’s greatest obstacle to meeting underserved needs within the community continues to be lack of resources given budget reductions at the Federal, State and local levels.

CAPER 9
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)
Identify the resources made available
Source of Funds Source Resources Made
Available
Amount Expended
During Program
Year
CDBG public - federal 1,399,055.24 910,623.84
CDBG-CV (1 and 3) public - federal 1,213,133 389,921.69 HUD-HCV (Section 8) public - federal 8,694,921.29 8,874,558.28 HOME
State Department of Housing and
Community Development 500,915.72 902,96.05
LOW MOD City as Housing Successor 117,431.66 297,450.86 BEGIN
State Department of Housing and
Community Development 33,967.16 0.00

CALHOME
State Department of Housing and
Community Development 65,209.00 3,394.37

AFFORDABLE
HOUSING Resale and In Lieu Fees 0.00 143,287.99
HOUSING TRUST Developer Subsidy Payoffs 449,844.57 1,355,000.63 Table 3 - Resources Made Available
Narrative
Roseville is an “exception grantee” under the CDBG rules that relate to the use of CDBG funds to benefit low-income areas. Rather than a residential area needing to be comprised of 51% or more low-income households to be considered low-income, areas that are within the upper quartile of low-income households are low-income areas for the purposes of CDBG funding.

The City of Roseville was awarded $713,722 in PY 2022. Total resources available, including unallocated prior year funds of $603,258.76 and program income received of $82,074.48, brought the total funding available to $1,399,055.24. Currently, the City has expended $910,623.84 in program year 2022. The unexpended balance to be carried over totals $488,431.40.

CDBG-CV: The City of Roseville was awarded a total of $1,213,133 in CDBG-CV funds ($417,412 from CV1 and $795,721 from CV3). The total expended CV funds are $1,100,455.36, leaving a carry over balance of $112,677.64.

CAPER 10
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Target Area Planned Percentage of
Allocation
Actual Percentage of
Allocation
Narrative Description
Table 4 – Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Narrative
Based on the 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS) data collected by HUD, the City’s “upper quartile” for 2022 was 46.81%.

CAPER 11
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Leveraging
Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the needs identified in the plan.

The City has actively sought funding sources in addition to CDBG to leverage its resources. In addition to CDBG, these were some of the funds that were available for use during the Program Year:

CalHome, HOME, Housing Choice Voucher Section 8 Rental Assistance, Redevelopment LowModerate Income Housing Funds, Local Housing Trust Funds and Affordable Housing Funds, Lowincome Housing Tax Credits, Tax Exempt Bond financing, State Housing-Related Parks Program Funds, and local developer contributions.

The City does not receive an entitlement allocation of HOME funds. The City must compete annually in order to receive State-administered HOME funds. The City was awarded $1M in 2014 from State HOME funds. This grant was completed in 2017 and the City only continues to administer program income.

The City of Roseville owns land at 120 Pacific Street that is currently being developed as an 80 unit affordable rental project known as Junction Crossing Apartments. Junction Crossing is located in a moderate resource area of the City, and will provide studio and one-bedroom apartments with rent affordable to extremely low to low-income households. The development is one of the City of Roseville’s pre-design projects and will address the City’s community development priorities as outlined in the Downtown Specific Plan, as well as local need for affordable housing that serves small 1-2 person households.

The City’s Housing Element notes that existing affordable housing inventory and future affordable housing sites were evaluated to ensure sites planned for future development would not further segregation patterns and trends. As noted, the City’s segregation pattern is low and therefore this evaluation is focused on whether the lower-income inventory is spread throughout the community (not concentrated in particular areas). Deed-restricted affordable housing and high density housing is distributed throughout the city. Housing capacity at varying levels of affordability is distributed evenly, and is not segregated. Additionally, the City’s existing affordable housing inventory and future affordable housing sites were evaluated to ensure sites planned for future development would not further segregation patterns and trends. To address fair housing issues in disadvantaged community areas, the City is focusing supportive and assertive programs to these areas and also increasing housing opportunities within high opportunity areas of the City.

The City of Roseville owns land at 505 Royer Street that is proposed to be developed as an 57 unit affordable rental project for seniors known as 505 Royer Street Apartments. These units will provide studio and one-bedroom apartments with rent affordable to extremely low to low-income households.

The development is will address the City’s community development priorities as outlined in the CAPER 12
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Downtown Specific Plan, as well as local need for affordable housing that serves senior 1-2 person households.

In the 2022 program year, the City provided $906,700 towards Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing (HPRR) services. Of the $906,700 made available, $250,000 was former Redevelopment Low- Moderate Housing funds, while the remaining $656,700 came from the Permanent Local Housing Allocation. These resources were awarded to four local collaborative non-profit grant applications and are providing funding to prevent homelessness (utility bills, healthcare costs, car repair, eviction prevention, etc.) or to help re-house a household (deposit, application, fees, etc.).

HPRR funds also provide job search assistance and food assistance. Four hundred and forty nine benefited from the 2022 PY HPRR funds; of those, beneficiaries included 22 seniors, 16 veterans, 163 disabled persons, 104 with minor(s) in the household, and 19 Transition Age Youth (TAY).

CAPER 13
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)
Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income, moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.

One-Year Goal Actual
Number of Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 20 15
Number of Non-Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 27 26
Number of Special-Needs households to be
provided affordable housing units 0 0
Total 47 41
Table 5 – Number of Households
One-Year Goal Actual
Number of households supported through
Rental Assistance 20 15
Number of households supported through
The Production of New Units 0 0
Number of households supported through
Rehab of Existing Units 27 26
Number of households supported through
Acquisition of Existing Units 0 0
Total 47 41
Table 6 – Number of Households Supported
Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals.

The City exceeded its goals for the production of affordable housing.

The City was one household short of meeting its goals for the rehabilitation of existing units through the Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation program. Due to funding constraints and staff limitations, the goal of rehabilitating six households fell short by one household. Five single family homes were provided assistance to correct home health and safety issues, and ultimately preserve and revitalize neighborhoods.

The 2022 Action Plan included a project for the development of affordable rental housing to allocate up to $500,000 toward affordable rental housing development to benefit low-income households and individuals. The intended goal of the project was to support new housing development through CAPER 14
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
acquisition of a site to be used for affordable rental housing development for low-income households and individuals. The proposed project would support the development of affordable rental housing goal in the Consolidated Plan, and was estimated to serve five households. With the release of a NOFA for the proposed project, a proposal was received to acquire a facility to be used for transitional housing.

Therefore a substantial amendment to the Action Plan was submitted which revised the “funding in support of affordable rental housing development” project to “acquisition of transitional housing facility”. While the original Consolidated Plan goal was to address the development of affordable rental housing, the amendment updated the goal to addressing homelessness.

One project contributing to the “Number of households supported through Rehab of Existing Units” was the installation of a pedestrian gate for the residents of the Home Start Program project. The property has 21 permanent housing units that now have improved access to the building through the modified pedestrian gate. Residents have been able to utilize the gate for walk through access to their apartments, thus increasing safety and alleviating accessibility challenges.

For the fiscal year, AMI Housing’s Transitional Housing for Persons with Mental Illness program served 75% of expected clients (15/20). This program has only 6 slots available at any given time, making it hard to project how many will be served during the fiscal year. This number is dependent on how long each individual stays in the program (they can stay for up to six months). AMI Housing has noticed that residents have been staying longer than in previous years, most likely due to the very low housing inventory in the community.

Through CDBG-CV funding, AMI Housing and KidsFirst administered rental assistance programs, which cumulatively were able to support 157 individuals in the 2022 program year. AMI Housing’s rental assistance program will continue through the upcoming program year.

Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.

The City does not expect outcomes for the Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Program to be impacted for future action plans. Goals are set based upon past funding history in order to meet the goals identified in the Five Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans.

Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity.

Number of Households Served CDBG Actual HOME Actual
Extremely Low-income 2 0
Low-income 3 0
Moderate-income 0 0
Total 5 0
Table 7 – Number of Households Served
CAPER 15
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Narrative Information
In October of 2022 RHA was awarded 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. This new allocation of vouchers was the first in over 12 years. During FY 2022-23 RHA increased the total voucher count from 795 to 823. This includes HCV vouchers and specialty vouchers EHV, NED, VASH, and Mainstream.

Through the HCV program, RHA more than doubled its leasing of homeless households from 19 to 42 through EHV, (1 VASH-PBV, 12 VASH, 2 PBV, & 15 Mainstream). 646 households in Roseville and 123 households in Rocklin were supported through rental assistance, a total of 769 families.

RHA has implemented a new landlord incentive program. The program is designed to encourage new private landlords to participate in the Housing Choice Voucher Program and create more available units for all voucher holders. Participating property owners will receive a one-time $1,000 payment each time they enter into a lease and contract with a Housing Choice Voucher holder. HUD’s Emergency Housing Voucher’s (EHV) came with services fees that allowed for a similar incentive program that proved extremely effective in leasing the EHV vouchers.

On May 3, 2023, the RHA hosted a Landlord Seminar at the Maidu Community Center for current and prospective property owners who wanted to learn more about participating in the Housing Choice Voucher program. Thirty property owners attended the seminar along with representatives from the Veterans Administration of Northern California (VA) and AMI Housing. The RHA staff covered topics which included the benefits of the voucher program, a review of upcoming policy changes, and a group Q&A session. The seminar was very successful and the RHA is planning to host more landlord events in the future.

The City of Roseville continued implementation of the City's 10% Affordable Housing Goal to increase the number of rental and purchase units affordable to very low, low and moderate-income households, and supported private development of affordable housing using Low-Income Housing Tax Credits, Tax Exempt Bond proceeds, Local Housing Trust Funds, and funds from the former Redevelopment Agency.

The housing market has recovered from the slowdown in housing production during the recent recession. Housing vacancy is between 2-3 percent in Roseville, decreasing the supply of affordable housing and increasing rents.

Affordable housing developers have been affected by reductions or eliminations of a variety of funding sources. The City is challenged to develop new affordable housing units given the reduction of resources to subsidize affordable housing production. This reality is further compounded by the impacts of a shrunken housing construction labor force, which leads to competition for labor with the Bay Area and higher overall building costs.

Extremely low-income and low-income renter households are served through local homeless prevention programs to prevent loss of housing. Housing Choice Vouchers and local affordable CAPER 16
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
housing opportunities are also provided to extremely low-income and low-income renter households, through local inclusionary requirements and tax credit projects.

Low-income homeowners are served through local homeless prevention programs as well. Energy efficiency programs are available through Project GO and Roseville Electric. Roseville Electric recently increased the maximum income requirements for their energy assistance program which allows more households to qualify for this important resource.

Maintenance/habitability programming is available through the Roseville Owner Occupied Rehabilitation (OOR) Program. Low-income homeowners are served through Roseville’s OOR program and local inclusionary requirements that produce affordable ownership opportunities and local secondary mortgage loans.

Moderate income renters are served through affordable housing opportunities under local inclusionary requirements and tax credit projects.

Middle income renters are served through the local rental housing market.

Middle income owners are served through the local inclusionary requirements that produce affordable ownership opportunities and local secondary mortgage loans. “WORST-CASE NEEDS”: Worst case housing needs are defined as low-income renter households who pay more than half their income for rent, live in seriously substandard housing, which includes homeless people, or have been involuntarily displaced. The City of Roseville served the worst-case needs in FY 2022-2023 by providing the following:

Very Low Income Renters Overpaying (more than 50% of income towards rent) are served through the Housing Choice Voucher program, particularly through the Small Area Fair Market Rents that Roseville adopted in February 2018; this was adopted to update local payment standards to better align with rents by zip code. These households are also served by local homeless prevention funding from the City to reduce potential risk of homelessness. The continued development of new affordable rental units and rental housing opportunities overall are also aimed at the goal of reducing incidents of overpayment within Roseville.

To address substandard housing, the Housing Choice Voucher program and the housing rehabilitation programs ensured that housing met Housing Quality Standards (HQS), State Standards and/or local standards for decent, safe and sanitary housing.

Homeless individuals are served through coordinated efforts of the Roseville Homeless Response Team within the Placer County Continuum of Care. In addition to homeless prevention and rapid rehousing funding that is provided by the City, Roseville Housing Authority received 50 Emergency Housing Vouchers in the 2021 PY, and 10 additional VASH Vouchers in 2022 to address the needs of homeless individuals. Additional services and coordination are provided through the Coordinated CAPER 17
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Entry System and local collaboration on the By Name List.

Persons with Disabilities are served through reasonable accommodations in all of the city’s programs. Additionally, persons with disabilities receive a preference under the City’s Housing Choice Voucher program, and are assisted by the Roseville Owner Occupied Rehabilitation Program and local agencies, including: Project GO, Seniors First, Placer Independent Resource Services (PIRS), and Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing (AMIH).

Involuntarily Displaced: During the reporting period, there was no involuntary displacement through the City’s programs.

CAPER 18
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through:

Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
The City of Roseville has the following outreach programs to individuals and families who are homeless:

Project Roomkey/Project Homekey: Project Roomkey in Roseville helped to shelter the most vulnerable people experiencing homelessness during the pandemic. The project is currently in the process of converting to permanent supportive housing and will be known as Sun Rose Apartments. The complex will provide 82 residential units and will provide mental health, disability, and recovery support services.

Drop-In Centers with Services: The Auburn Welcome Center and the Cirby Clubhouse in Roseville are mainly staffed by mental health clinicians and clients that provide homeless individuals and families a place to use computers to search for jobs, housing, and services. This Center also houses the The Gathering Inn Mid Placer Shelter in Auburn. The Gathering Inn South Placer has a Wednesday and Saturday health clinic, and daily provides a clothing closet and laundry facilities in addition to a nightly emergency shelter through the rotation of local churches.

Social Services Unit of the Police Department: In 2016, the police department created the Social Services Unit (SSU). The SSU completes regular outreach and interaction with the local unsheltered population. Through this unit, local County Housing Coordinators, and Roseville Housing staff, individuals who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness are being referred to appropriate services and housing options within the Continuum of Care. These efforts are further augmented through a City-County outreach partnership that utilizes a homeless outreach worker position for South Placer and City efforts towards its own outreach worker.

Point in Time Count: The City of Roseville Social Services Unit and Housing staff led the 2023 Point in Time Count efforts throughout South Placer and achieved great success in scheduling training and events for data collection and conducting outreach to individuals otherwise unreachable for the Point In Time Count.

Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Emergency shelter is provided locally through a rotating shelter at local churches, coordinated by The Gathering Inn. This shelter serves an average of 60-90 individuals each evening. Local transitional housing programs through Roseville HomeStart and Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing (AMIH) address much-needed transitional housing needs for families and individuals with mental illness. Lastly, Stand Up Placer provides emergency and transitional housing for domestic violence and human trafficking victims countywide.

CAPER 19
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs Homeless priorities have been established within the framework of the Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras (HRCS) and CA 515 – the Placer County Continuum of Care; the priorities have been set as:
emergency shelter, transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, and rapid re-housing. In February 2023, Placer County established a low barrier mobile temporary shelter for people experiencing homelessness. The MTS is located at the Government Center in mid Placer and offers 50 beds. This brings the total emergency beds to 338, of which 46 are solely for survivors of domestic violence. The 292 remaining beds are at The Gathering Inn mid Placer, The Gathering Inn South Placer, and in East Placer.

Motel vouchers are available for short-term and extreme circumstances.

Permanent Supportive housing is identified as a high-priority. The need for emergency shelter, mental health services, substance abuse treatment, and emergency food and clothing exists, especially for some subpopulations, such as those with severe mental illness or individuals who are chronically homeless (who have had regular or continued periods of homelessness).

The City of Roseville Housing Division participates in discussions with the Placer County probation staff on better discharge and services planning for existing inmates, including a specific focus on inmates with mental illness. Placer County’s Continuum of Care has implemented a Coordinated Entry System through a central phone line, 211, and is working to increase its use by inmates scheduled to leave jail soon as a means for planning their housing options more proactively. Services staff at the jail are actively working on increased use of the phone line as part of and prior to discharge planning.

Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again
Outreach: The City of Roseville Social Services Unit, Placer County’s Homeless Liaison Team, and The Gathering Inn provide outreach to connect people with services to get them housed.

Rapid Rehousing: Local service providers are applying for and have received Rapid Rehousing and Homeless Prevention funds to assist homeless families and individuals. The City also partners with CAPER 20
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AMI Housing to provide motel vouchers, security deposits, and rental assistance to assist with rapid rehousing and homelessness prevention.

Housing: In planning the housing needs of these populations the CoC considers the housing needs for both families and individuals. The scattered site housing programs serve both populations. The local housing authorities have also secured and are leasing up VASH Vouchers, Mainstream Vouchers, and Emergency Housing Vouchers to serve individuals and families who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. These vouchers have been successful in getting Veterans, families, and chronically homeless individuals housed. Roseville Housing Authority is seeking additional vouchers to serve individuals and families who are homeless.

Coordinated Services: Domestic violence, substance abuse, mental and physical disabilities can all contribute to individuals and family homelessness. There are collaborative community efforts to provide coordinated services to those in need of assistance. The City participates in the Built for Zero effort and leads regular meetings with social service providers and social workers to address barriers to housing of each person on the By Name List.

Unaccompanied youth: Placer County’s Transition to Independence Process (TIP) program serves Transition Aged Youth ages 14 to 24 who are experiencing emotional and/or behavioral difficulties.

Youth receive assistance to make a successful transition into adulthood. The County also has a collaborative called the Transition Aged Youth Housing Collaborative to provide housing assistance for transition aged youth who are homeless or at imminent risk of homelessness. The focus of the collaborative is to work with local providers to offer unaccompanied youth the support and services they need.

CAPER 21
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)
Actions taken to address the needs of public housing
The City does not have public housing. The Roseville Housing Authority operates the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Section 8 Rental Assistance Program which serves both the cities of Roseville and Rocklin.

Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership
Not applicable; the City does not have public housing.

Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs
Not applicable. The Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) received a rating of High Performer for the sixteenth consecutive year.

CAPER 22
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)
Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i) As of the third year of the five-year plan, there are currently approximately 1,500 affordable units (designated for very-low and low income persons) in the entitlement phase for future production within the next five years. The City continues to support opportunities for the redevelopment of underutilized parcels downtown, particularly for high density and affordable housing development. The City also works to increase opportunities for higher density and the use of density bonuses throughout the city.

The Density Bonus Program provides for a minimum 20% to a maximum 50% density bonus in the maximum number of dwelling units, in addition to incentives and/or concessions. The concessions and/or incentives may include reduction in zoning standards, development standards, design requirements, mixed-use zoning, financial assistance, or any other incentive that would reduce costs of the developer.

City Council approved the Douglas Boulevard/Harding Boulevard Corridor Plan which includes a mix of single-family residential properties, single-family residences which have been converted to businesses, aging hotels, and many older commercial properties with large, minimally improved parking fields. The new Commercial Corridor Plan Specific Plan established mixed-use land use and zoning designations to provide more opportunities for redevelopment and reuse, more flexible zoning and development standards, and streamlined approval processes. The City added capacity for a minimum of 600 lowerincome residential units, which represents both the total and realistic capacity.

The City has a ministerial approval process, called Objective Design Standards (ODS) for affordable housing projects which meet specified criteria. The streamlined approval process is an opt-in program for developers who must request streamlined ministerial approval at the time of application to the City.

To qualify, the developer must agree to enter into an affordable housing agreement with the City ensuring a minimum of 20% of the units will be affordable to low, very low, or extremely low income households. A qualifying project may opt to be reviewed for conformity with the City’s ODS though the ministerial Building Permit process in lieu of the City’s discretionary Design Review Permit process. The ODS program has been used to approve 6 affordable housing projects so far.

Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) Consistent with priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan, during the 2022 Program Year the City provided funding for the following activities that addressed priority special needs populations:
• Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing (AMIH) provided case management, vouchers and other support CAPER 23
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
services to individuals with mental illness.
• Stand Up Placer assisted those in abusive situations and victims of human trafficking to recover and reenter society. • KidsFirst offered intensive social services and individual therapy to children and families with young children.
• Seniors First Meals on Wheels and Saint Vincent de Paul Society’s BAGS program offered nutrition for seniors and disabled persons.
• The Gathering Inn provided mental health services for homeless individuals and families. • The rehabilitation of owner-occupied housing was addressed through the City’s Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation program. These projects helped maintain the affordable housing stock in the City.
• The City provided residents with fair housing information and services, and support for compliance with Federal and State fair housing law, through a contract with a Fair Housing Services provider. • CARES Act Projects were a high priority need, which entailed activities to Prevent, Prepare for, or Respond to the COVID-19 virus. Activities addressed with CDBG-CV funds in the 2022 PY included: AMI Housing’s COVID Homeless Prevention Assistance program, KidsFirst Rental/Mortgage & Utility Assistance Program, and Placer County Office of Education’s After-School Care for Homeless Students program.
• The 2023 Placer Veterans Stand Down event assembled over 60 service providers to offer free services to military veterans and their family members.
• Installation of a pedestrian gate for the residents of the Home Start Program. The project is currently in the finalization stages although residents have been able to start utilizing the gate for walk through access to their apartments, thus increasing safety and alleviating accessibility challenges. • The acquisition of AMI Housing’s Monarch House allowed the agency to continue administering their program to assist low-income persons with mental illness undergoing mental health crisis.

The City’s Housing Authority has recently created a quarterly newsletter, which is disbursed to various agencies and participants and also kept in the Housing Division lobby. The newsletter provides a variety of resources available to City residents. For example, the newsletter advertises the Affordable Connectivity Program through the FCC, which is a program to assist low-income households with broadband service to provide high speed connectivity they need for work, school, and healthcare. The newsletter also promotes the City’s Fair Housing Services provider, Project Sentinel, along with a variety of other resources to assist Roseville residents.

Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City has taken the following actions toward awareness and elimination of lead-based paint hazards:

The City continued to provide information regarding lead-based paint hazards to Roseville residents and employees.

The City includes, as part of its inspection process for the Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation, and Housing Choice Voucher Section 8 Rental Assistance Programs, an inspection of painted surfaces for the CAPER 24
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
discovery of the potential presence of lead-based paint. If the inspection conducted identifies that a potential hazard exists, the City requires the rehabilitation contractor or homeowner to follow HUD guidelines for mitigation or removal of the lead-based paint hazard.

Grants are available for initial inspection, mitigation, and clearance costs for all of these programs through the City’s Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Program (LBPHRP). Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME funds are set aside to offer these grants; under the Housing Rehabilitation Program, grants are provided for all actual costs of lead-based paint evaluation and reduction activities.

The City also requires that rental property owners properly maintain their dwelling units. Deteriorated surfaces containing lead-based paint posing a hazard to occupants is reportable to the Placer County Environmental Health Department and represents a potential County Health Code violation subject to appropriate mitigation by the rental property owner.

The City continues to fund the Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Program to comply with the 1992 Housing and Community Development Act (Title X) in addressing potential lead-based paint hazards.

Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) During the 2022 Program Year the City took the following actions to reduce the incidence of poverty within the City's jurisdiction:
- The City continued to promote the Family Self Sufficiency Program for Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) participants and actively recruited new households to participate. - The City continued its policy of promoting a jobs/housing balance to ensure a variety of jobs with varying levels of skill and training and development of affordable housing to all income groups. - The Senior Nutrition Program and the BAGS program supported the nutritional needs of persons in poverty. Due to coronavirus, the Meals on Wheels program was modified in accordance with the CDC and local guidelines to ensure the nutritional needs of the low income residents of Roseville continued to be met. The program transitioned from providing one hot meal daily to seniors, to instead providing five home-delivered meals three times per week. Those experiencing very low food security also receive supplemental groceries. Staff and volunteers also conduct wellness phone calls and provide information and assistance to those seeking community resources.

Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) With regard to the distribution of affordable housing, it has been the goal of the City’s 10% affordable housing program to distribute new, affordable housing throughout the City by requiring that each specific plan provide 10% of their total housing units as affordable to low and middle-income households.

CAPER 25
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
The City has continued to rely on the Housing Division to administer its housing programs and implement housing policies. The Housing Division administers rental assistance, housing rehabilitation, and new construction projects. The Housing Division also provides resource information and referral to residents, including referrals to homeless assistance, fair housing, legal services, etc.

The programs administered by the Housing Division are funded through a variety of public and private sources, including Federal, State, City and private developer funding under local affordable housing requirements.

The City continues to work toward a regional approach to serving the needs of residents through the Continuum of Care on a countywide basis.

Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The Housing Division acts as a liaison between other public and private agencies to maximize service to Roseville residents and prevent duplication of services.

Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a) The City displays its Fair Housing Banner in a prominent location within the Housing Division Offices, as well as at functions throughout the year where the City is represented. The banner reads, “Fair Housing is Everyone’s Right” in both English and Spanish and also includes the Equal Housing Opportunity logo.

Fair Housing pamphlets and literature are also made available to the public. Housing Division Supervisory staff continues to work with other staff members to further their knowledge of fair housing laws and issues, including making pamphlets and news articles available to staff. Staff regularly receives Fair Housing and diversity training. Housing staff attended Fair Housing Training presented by Project Sentinel in April 2023.

Housing Division staff continues to record all housing complaints, including those regarding discrimination and works cooperatively with the local Legal Services branch. In the case of alleged discrimination, residents are provided with information regarding fair housing law, a HUD discrimination complaint form, and referrals to legal services, the State Department of Fair Housing and Employment, and other appropriate agencies.

The City’s Housing Authority continues to request and receive VASH, Mainstream and Projectbased vouchers. During the 2022 program year, the Housing Authority was awarded 10 VASH vouchers, 10 Mainstream vouchers which serve those who are homeless or at risk of homelessness.

CAPER 26
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
The 2020 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, or AI, was conducted as a joint effort for the Sacramento Valley region, including Roseville. According to the AI, Roseville is one of several cities in the region where residents are most likely to have access to economically strong neighborhoods.

Additionally, residents of Roseville are one of several cities in the region where residents are most likely to have access to proficient schools. Survey results found that residents living in Roseville tended to rate each healthy neighborhood indicator (ease of getting to the places they want to go using their preferred transportation option, convenient access to grocery stores, job opportunities, and health care facilities, and park and recreation facilities of similar quality to other neighborhoods) higher than the regional average. Various recommendations for the City were identified in the AI adopted in 2020, including:
expanding affordable rental opportunities; increasing homeownership among under-represented groups; and focusing on a range of equity issues.

In order to address these recommendations, the City has:
- Worked to expand equity in access to economic opportunity: One of the strategies in the AI to address fair housing barriers included the goal to expand equity in access to economic opportunity. In order to address this goal, the City has partnered with Placer County Adult System of Care (ASOC) with Mainstream Vouchers and also partnered with ASOC’s Full Service Partnership Program with Project Based Vouchers. The City administered Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing (HPRR) program partners with mental health, recovery, and disability service providers to reduce housing instability.
- Administered the Family Self Sufficiency Program (FSS) for Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) participants. When a participant of the program receives an increase in income, any rent increases are saved in an escrow account that they will receive once they successfully complete the program. In the 2022 PY, 29 particpants enrolled in the program, and four graduated.

Roughly $54,000 was disbursed between the four graduates. Participants assisted included 18 female head of householders, and seven Hispanic households. - Expanded affordable rental opportunities by increasing accessible and affordable housing opportunities. The City has affordable housing development agreements with 26 multi-family and senior complexes. Out of the total 1,982 units, 449 are accessible units. Of the 17 multifamily apartments, 14 have 3-bedroom units, and two have 4-bedroom units to accommodate larger families.
- Contracted with a fair housing services provider, Project Sentinel. This organization has worked in conjunction with the City to provide comprehensive fair housing services of investigation, counseling and legal referrals for victims of housing discrimination. During PY 2022, Project Sentinel provided valuable community education and outreach regarding fair housing law and practices to Roseville residents, including tenants and landlords. More specifically, Project Sentinel accomplished the following actions:
o In the 2022 PY, four outreach events were directed to Roseville tenants, landlords, the public, as well as service providers, including:
 In September 2022, Project Sentinel attended the Roseville Homeless Housing Services Meeting, where the agency met a number of service organizations for Roseville who were in attendance. There were 12 attendees.

CAPER 27
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
 In April 2023, an in-person Property Management Office (PMO) Training Presentation was presented to the Roseville Housing Authority. The PMO Training is an in-depth presentation for housing providers. The presentation included an overview of applicable California and Federal fair housing law and protected classes. There were approximately 25 attendees. Fifty fair housing brochures were distributed.
 In May 2023, Project Sentinel conducted an online training for Continuum of Care providers focused on the expanded protections for the LGBTQ community, particularly HUD’s Equal Access Rule that protects the trans community seeking shelter services. There were 129 attendees.
 In June 2023, Project Sentinel ran timely radio ads on four radio stations that cover the greater Sacramento region including Roseville: KNTY 103.5, KRCX 99.9, KHMM 101.9, and KXSE 104.3. The reach for these ads was directly to tenants.

The organization approximates that the reach here was at a minimum of 50. o Opened eight cases and assisted 35 people via 16 calls. 75% of opened cases were Source of Income cases. These cases were aimed at housing providers who either refused to rent to prospective tenants because of their low-income status, or the housing provider would not perform their duties in the same way they would for other tenants. The basis of the complaints included: eviction, different terms/conditions, refuse to rent, reasonable accommodation, hostile environment, modifications/accessibility.
o Project Sentinel did not have any HUD or CRD referrals this last fiscal year. They were able to provide extended counseling to several clients and opened several cases for testing investigation. Project Sentinel completed a test on a large apartment complex in Roseville in July that found no evidence of discrimination based on source of income.

Testing has been focused on source of income discrimination as the number of complaints received across the region based on source of income has increased. Project Sentinel also worked with a tenant to assist her with a reasonable accommodation request and communicate with management.
o Currently the organization has brochures available in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Tagalog, and Vietnamese.

Through the actions listed above, the City is providing valuable services to address various issues of discrimination found in the community. The programs and progress directed through the City’s Housing Division, in conjunction with the outreach efforts conducted by Project Sentinel, is translating to more residents becoming aware of services as well as rights when it comes to fair housing.

CAPER 28
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
Each year, the City conducts a risk assessment of subrecipients to determine the need for monitoring. All subrecipients are subject to a minimum of desk monitoring. If the risk assessment reveals the need, onsite monitoring is also conducted. Staff will monitor 2022-2023 subrecipients in the fall and winter of 2023.

Additionally, individualized technical assistance was provided to subrecipients on an as-needed basis throughout a program year.

Roseville seeks to ensure minority business owners are included in any outreach and comprehensive planning requirements. In order to do so, public notices are translated and offered in Spanish, and any request for additional translation is available for those who request it. All organizations applying for funding are provided technical assistance to ensure they have info they need to apply. Notices of Funding Availability (NOFA) are provided to a variety of groups to encourage diverse populations have access to the information, including the Placer County Continuum of Care, the Latino Leadership Council, and Placer Collaborative Network. NOFA’s are also posted in public locations such as City libraries. Any Requests for Proposals released by the City are noticed in the local newspaper and posted on the City’s website in order to ensure a variety of submittals are attained. Contracts include language regarding equal opportunity and nondiscrimination, and contracts requiring subcontractors are encouraged to reach out to minority and women owned businesses for the work to be subcontracted.

Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d)
Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports.

The City published a notice in the Roseville Press Tribune on September 1, 2023 announcing the availability of the CAPER for public review, the public comment period, to whom comment should be submitted, and the scheduled public hearing. The notice was published in English and in Spanish. Notice was also published on the City’s website.

The public was invited to comment during a minimum 15-day period, September 1, 2023 through September 20, 2023.

Any public comments received will be included before the CAPER is submitted to HUD.

CAPER 29
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
The Roseville City Council reviews, conducts the public hearing, and approves the CAPER prior to submission to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The City notified public service agencies directly via an email to several local non-profit collaborations regarding the availability of the 2022 CAPER and attached electronic copies/links of the public review/hearing notice and Draft document. Agencies notified included the Placer Collaborative Network, the Placer Consortium on Homelessness, the Latino Leadership Council, and the Health Education Council. The Latino Leadership Council is a local nonprofit that provides services to underserved Spanish-speaking populations by connecting Latinos to a multitude of health, education, and youth development services. The Health Education Council serves residents in under-served communities, particularly minorities. All of these organizations provide services to minorities and persons with disabilities. The City encourages all agencies who receive these types of notices to share this information with their clients and other organizations who may be interested in the Draft CAPER.

A public hearing will be held before the City Council on September 20, 2023 to review the City’s progress in meeting its Housing and Community Development needs. The public hearing will allow additional opportunity for the public to comment on the 2022 CAPER.

During the public hearing on September 20, 2023, City Council members will be given the opportunity to ask questions. Any questions asked by the Council will be included before submission of report to HUD.

In order to address access to public meetings for persons with disabilities, Roseville Transit offers ADA Paratransit for ADA-certified passengers. Additionally, all information is available in an accessible format to persons with visual impairment upon request. All public notices state:

The hearing will be available for live access on Comcast 14, Consolidated Communications 73, AT&T U-verse, and the City’s YouTube channel. All interested persons are invited to appear and be heard.

Meeting facilities are accessible to persons with disabilities. By request, translation services and documents, as well as alternative accessible document formats are available to persons with varying language needs or disabilities. To arrange an alternative agenda document format or to arrange aid or services to modify or accommodate persons with a disability to participate in a public meeting, please contact the City of Roseville by calling 916-774-5200 (voice) or 916-774- 5220 (TDD) a minimum of two business days prior to the meeting.

The CAPER will be submitted to HUD by September 30, 2023 for review.

CAPER 30
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)
Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences.

The Johnson Pool ADA improvements project with the City’s Parks and Recreation Department has been delayed due to issues with procuring bids. In September 2022, the project went out to bid, with only one bid received which was far above the project budget. After getting Council approval to reject all bids, the project went out to bid again with a reduced scope, yet no bids were received. The Parks and Recreation Department is working on revising the project scope and design in order to take the project out to bid again. Therefore, this project is currently pending, and accomplishments have not yet been reported.

Should the project not move forward, the City will review the Consolidated and Annual Plan to determine how to reallocate the funds in order to meet the City’s highest priority needs.

A similar issue occurred with the project planned for The Gathering Inn to soundproof offices for mental health clinicians, case managers, and interns to provide confidential meeting space; although the project was advertised several times, the agency was not able to secure more than one bid for the sound proofing project prior to the contract deadline. Due to the issues with procuring bids and deadline constraints, it was determined the project would be canceled. The agency was encouraged to reapply for the project in a future funding cycle, perhaps with an increased budget to allow for more interest from potential bidders.

CDBG-CV: Report on impacts of COVID pandemic on formula CPD programs:

Due to the pandemic, as part of the 2019 and 2020 Annual Action Plan, the City added priorities and objectives in order to prevent, prepare for and respond to coronavirus. There was no discontinuation of any non-CV related activities, and Annual Action Plan goals continued to be met. The 2021 NOFA for CDBG funds received minimal applications, with no capital improvements project applications. At that time, subrecipients were still working on spending down the influx of additional funds received due to COVID. With the release of the NOFA for 2022 CDBG Entitlement funds, the City received applications for eight public service programs and three capital improvements projects, which is trending back towards typical pre-COVID numbers. Even so, due to factors which impacted spending of all current year projects such as issues with procurement as discussed in CR-45, not all of the City’s available grant funds were able to be expended. As for CV specific programs, the City is on track to expend the COVID related funds by the end of the next program year.

The coronavirus pandemic had an impact on several of the CDBG public services programs, including Stand Up Placer and Seniors First. Stand Up Placer, which serves victims of domestic violence, has continued to see increases in the number of beneficiaries served, including increases in calls to the Domestic Violence Emergency Response Team. Due to the pandemic, Seniors First made a change to their Meals on Wheels program, shifting their five day a week meal delivery to three times a week, with CAPER 31
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
the inclusion of frozen meals along with fresh meals. This helped reduce the amount of visits to homes to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus and ensure as much social distancing as possible.

Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) grants?
No
[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.

CAPER 32
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-58 – Section 3
Identify the number of individuals assisted and the types of assistance provided Total Labor Hours CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF
Total Number of Activities 1 0 0 0 0
Total Labor Hours 0
Total Section 3 Worker Hours 0
Total Targeted Section 3 Worker Hours 0
Table 8 – Total Labor Hours
Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Public Housing Targeted Workers
Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Other Funding Targeted Workers.

Direct, on-the job training (including apprenticeships).

Indirect training such as arranging for, contracting for, or paying tuition for, off-site training.

Technical assistance to help Section 3 workers compete for jobs (e.g., resume assistance, coaching).

Outreach efforts to identify and secure bids from Section 3 business concerns.

Technical assistance to help Section 3 business concerns understand and bid on contracts.

Division of contracts into smaller jobs to facilitate participation by Section 3 business concerns.

Provided or connected residents with assistance in seeking employment including: drafting resumes,preparing for interviews, finding job opportunities, connecting residents to job placement services.

Held one or more job fairs.

Provided or connected residents with supportive services that can provide direct services or referrals.

Provided or connected residents with supportive services that provide one or more of the following: work readiness health screenings, interview clothing, uniforms, test fees, transportation.

Assisted residents with finding child care.

Assisted residents to apply for, or attend community college or a four year educational institution.

Assisted residents to apply for, or attend vocational/technical training.

Assisted residents to obtain financial literacy training and/or coaching.

Bonding assistance, guaranties, or other efforts to support viable bids from Section 3 business concerns.

Provided or connected residents with training on computer use or online technologies.

Promoting the use of a business registry designed to create opportunities for disadvantaged and small businesses.

Outreach, engagement, or referrals with the state one-stop system, as designed in Section 121(e)(2) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.

Other.

Table 9 – Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program CAPER 33
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Narrative
Section 3 is a provision of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968. The purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that employment and other economic opportunities generated by CDBG funds shall, to the greatest extent feasible, and consistent with existing Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, be directed to low- and very low-income persons, particularly those who are recipients of government assistance for housing, in addition to business concerns which provide economic opportunities to lowand very low-income persons.

One capital and improvements project slated to be completed within the 2022/23 program year was an ADA improvements project to Johnson Pool. As detailed in CR-45, the project has been delayed due to a lack of bids and budget constraints. The project was advertised on the HUD Section 3 Opportunity Portal to encourage bidding by Section 3 businesses. It is anticipated that this project will go out to bid again in the near future. Additionally, although The Gathering Inn office soundproofing project did not proceed, the agency also advertised the project on the Section 3 Opportunity Portal in an effort to have a Section 3 business bid on the project.

The Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation projects totaled $230,374, which was the combination of five separate homeowner projects. Although not subject to Section 3 since each single family owneroccupied rehabilitation was under the $200k threshold, one contractor who completed a single family rehab in the 2022 program year is registered as a Section 3 business. This contractor discovered the program through an advertisement for the program on the City’s website.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2950
File #: 0709-01 & 0215-02
Title: Winding Creek Apartments Project - Fee Deferral
Contact: Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected] Meeting Date: 9/20/2023
Item #: 11.6.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a fee deferral for the 3338 Blue Oaks Boulevard, Winding Creek Apartments project, consisting of a 216 multi-family residential unit apartment complex in the amount of approximately $3,347,293, plus interest, until building permit occupancy/final permit is issued.

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville offers a fee deferral program through the Economic Development Department as an incentive to encourage development. The Winding Creek Apartments project is requesting a fee deferral of certain City controlled impact fees. The fee deferral requires City Council approval and that development impact fees are paid for prior to building permit occupancy or the issuance of a final permit, as applicable to each permit.

The Economic Development Department received the attached request from Anthem United Homes Construction, LP. on July 24, 2023, requesting approval of a fee deferral for the Winding Creek Apartment complex (“Complex”). The Complex is located within the Creekview Specific Plan area at 3338 Blue Oaks Boulevard. As shown on the attached plans, the Complex proposes construction of 216 residential units within nine (9) buildings plus a club house, pool, site parking and play areas. All units will be rented at market rates.

A fee estimate has been prepared for the Complex based on the fees for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

Only City controlled impact fees are eligible for deferral. The fee deferral types and amounts are identified below:

Fee Item Fee Amount
Fire Service Construction Fee (WRSP Fiddyment DA) $132,920.37 Public Facilities Fee $573,696.00
Water Connection Fee -Domestic $1,033,128.00
Drainage Fees (Pleasant Grove Creek) $113,832.00
Traffic Mitigation Fee $1,182,707.78
Public Benefit Fee $182,520.00
Solid Waste Fee $32,241.48
Electric Backbone Fee Three Phase $96,247.65
Total Eligible Deferral Fees $3,347,293.29
The list of fees eligible for deferral has been vetted by the applicable City departments and only those determined to have no impact to the budget have been included above. As shown above, the current total eligible fee deferral is $3,347,293. The total amount of deferrable fees could change if building permits are pulled outside of FY2023-24, however, the list of deferrable fees would not change following Council action on this item.

Pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code (RMC) Section 4.04.040, all non-residential fee deferrals greater than $100,000 dollars are required to be approved by the City Council. The typical construction and inspection timeframe for apartment complexes is 12-24 months. In an effort to cover lost interest resulting from the City fee deferral there is an interest charge of 1.35% that will be paid upon building permit occupancy or the issuance of a final permit. The RMC additionally identifies an administrative processing fee of $924.90 to be charged per building permit to cover staff's time of processing requests.

FISCAL IMPACT
The requested deferral will not result in a loss of impact fees nor earned interest income. The development impact fees are required to be paid prior to issuance of building permit occupancy/final permit. To ensure that the City will not have any loss of interest income, the RMC requires that interest be charged on monies deferred. Specifically, the City's Finance Department identified that the City's ten-year average pooled interest rate is approximately

1.35%. Therefore, interest at a rate of 1.35% will be charged on the monies deferred to cover the City's cost of loss of interest income on the fee deferral. Additionally, the RMC identifies an administrative processing fee of $924.90 to be charged to each building permit.

The City's fee deferral program is an important economic development tool that facilitates new development that may not otherwise be financially feasible without this program. As a result, this program has the potential to increase impact fees and investment that directly increase property values that may not otherwise occur if this program was not available. Construction of this housing development will create approximately 65-150 temporary construction jobs and approximately 4- 10 permanent full and/or part time jobs.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15061(c)(3) and §15378. This fee deferral meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Gina McColl, Economic Development Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-381
Application
Plans
RESOLUTION NO. 23-381
APPROVING FEE DEFERRALS FOR THE 3338 BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD,

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Roseville has offered a fee deferral program through the Economic Development Department since the mid 1990’s to encourage development; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development Department received a request from Anthem United Homes Construction, LP, requesting a fee deferral of certain City controlled impact fees; and
WHEREAS, the fee deferral requires City Council approval and that the deferred fees be paid for prior to the issuance of a building permit occupancy/final permit; and WHEREAS, staff recommends City Council approve the City fee deferral to building permit occupancy/final permit in the amount of $3,347,293.29, plus interest, for the 3338 Blue Oaks Boulevard, Winding Creek Apartments project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the City fee deferral to building permit occupancy/final permit in the amount of $3,347,293.29, plus interest, for the 3338 Blue Oaks Boulevard, Winding Creek Apartments project is hereby approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
Non-Residential Impact Fee Deferral Application
Revised 7/3/2023
Non-Residential Development
Impact Fee Deferral Application
Impact Fee Deferral Program
The Impact Fee Deferral Program allows applicants to defer the payment of City controlled impact fees for new non-residential development and building expansions.

Please contact the Building Division at (916) 774-5332 prior to submitting this deferral application to obtain a fee estimate and verify the program requirements related to your project. Where deferred fees are estimated to be $99,999 or less, the Development Services Department may approve the deferral administratively. Where deferred fees are estimated to be $100,000 or more, please contact the Economic Development Department at (916) 774-5362 as City Council approval will be required. At time of submittal, please provide a copy of your fee estimate and, if applicable, a copy of the Resolution approved by Council with this completed application.

Payment of all deferred fees will be required prior to final inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. To utilize the program, a processing charge of $924.90 will be collected at the time of permit issuance. In addition, a supplemental fee totaling the City’s pooled interest rate ten year average will be collected prior to final inspection to cover the financing costs of monies deferred.

By completing and signing this form you hereby agree to the program requirements, processing charge and supplemental fee, as outlined above and in Roseville Municipal Code Section 4.04.

Project Information
Address: ______ _____
Specific Plan Area: Lot # and APN: _____
Property Owner/Builder Information
Builder:

Mailing Address:

Contact Person: Phone Number: _____
Owner Signature: Email:

Staff Use Only
Permit #: BD
Approval: □ Administrative
□ Council (Reso #:____)
Interest Rate:

Date:

Technician Initials:

Development Services Department
Building Inspection Division
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, California 95678-2649
3338 Blue Oaks Blvd. Roseville 95747
Anthem United Homes Construction, LP.
3001 Douglas Blvd. Suite 100 Roseville 95747
Kevin Sheley 916-740-4257
[email protected]
Bldg. A (6): 27,291. Bldg. B (3): 31,294 Ammenity: 6559 Lot 1A APN 017-490-001 & 017-490-002 BOV
BOV
BOV
BOV

UNIT SUMMARY

PARKING SUMMARY

BIKE PARKING SUMMARY

PROJECT SUMMARY

UNIT SUMMARY

PARKING SUMMARY

BIKE PARKING SUMMARY

PROJECT SUMMARY
JULY 14, 2022

FINAL DRP SUBMITTAL
3338 Blue Oaks Blvd at Cloud Dance Dr, Roseville, California Proposed
By:

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS - ROSEVILLE
Anthem United
3001 Douglas Blvd
Roseville, CA 95661
TSD ENGINEERING, INC.
785 Orchard Drive, Suite #110
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 608-0707 Fax: (916) 608-0701
expect more.

N
S
W E
scale: 1"=30'

BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD
(PROPOSED WIDENING BY OTHERS) CLOUD DANCE DRIVE
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C2.0
BLDG 8
TYPE B
24 UNITS
3 STORY
BLDG 7
TYPE B
24 UNITS
3 STORY
BLDG 6
TYPE B
24 UNITS
3 STORY
BLDG 5
TYPE A
24 UNITS
3 STORY
BLDG 4
TYPE A
24 UNITS
3 STORY
BLDG 3
TYPE A
24 UNITS
3 STORY
BLDG 2
TYPE A
24 UNITS
3 STORY
BLDG 10
TYPE A
24 UNITS
3 STORY
BLDG 9
TYPE A
24 UNITS
3 STORY
BLDG 1
CLUB
HOUSE
1 STORY

LANDSCAPE AREA

ASPHALT

PAVEMENT

BUILDING AREA

SIDEWALK

WATER QUALITY
BASIN

CONCRETE
POOL
SITE LEGEND:

CONSTRUCTION NOTES:

TURF

DC EXHIBIT A
2ND FLOOR
1ST FLOOR
3RD FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

TOP OF RIDGE
A1.01
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - APT. BLDG A - 24 PLEX
Roseville, Ca.

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS
Roseville, Ca.

The drawings presented are illustrative of character and design intent only, and are subject to change based upon final design considerations (i.e. applicable codes, structural, and MEP design requirements, unit plan / floor plan changes, etc.) © 2021 BSB Design, Inc. April 27, 2022 |MR210118.00

FRONT ELEVATION

LEFT ELEVATION FRONT PERSPECTIVE
scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (on 24"x36" sheet)
0 4' 8' 16' 24' CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, June 24, 2022 |MR210118.00 July 15, 2022 | MR210118.00 CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, July 15, 2022 |MR210118.00

DC EXHIBIT C
2ND FLOOR
1ST FLOOR
3RD FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

TOP OF RIDGE
A1.02
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - APT. BLDG A - 24 PLEX
Roseville, Ca.

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS
Roseville, Ca.

BACK ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION BACK PERSPECTIVE
scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (on 24"x36" sheet)
0 4' 8' 16' 24' CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, June 24, 2022 |MR210118.00 July 15, 2022 | MR210118.00 CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, July 15, 2022 |MR210118.00

DC EXHIBIT C
2ND FLOOR
1ST FLOOR
3RD FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

TOP OF RIDGE
A1.03
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - APT. BLDG A - 24 PLEX - ALT COLORS Roseville, Ca.

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS
Roseville, Ca.

FRONT ELEVATION

LEFT ELEVATION FRONT PERSPECTIVE
scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (on 24"x36" sheet)
0 4' 8' 16' 24' CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, June 24, 2022 |MR210118.00 July 15, 2022 | MR210118.00

DC EXHIBIT C
2ND FLOOR
1ST FLOOR
3RD FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

TOP OF RIDGE
A1.04
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - APT. BLDG A - 24 PLEX - ALT. COLORS Roseville, Ca.

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS
Roseville, Ca.

BACK ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION BACK PERSPECTIVE
scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (on 24"x36" sheet)
0 4' 8' 16' 24' CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, June 24, 2022 |MR210118.00 July 15, 2022 | MR210118.00

DC EXHIBIT C
2ND FLOOR
1ST FLOOR
3RD FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

TOP OF RIDGE
A2.01
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - APT. BLDG B - 24 PLEX
Roseville, Ca.

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS
Roseville, Ca.

FRONT ELEVATION

LEFT ELEVATION FRONT PERSPECTIVE
scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (on 24"x36" sheet)
0 4' 8' 16' 24' CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, June 24, 2022 |MR210118.00 July 15, 2022 | MR210118.00

DC EXHIBIT C
2ND FLOOR
1ST FLOOR
3RD FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

TOP OF RIDGE
A2.02
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - APT. BLDG B - 24 PLEX
Roseville, Ca.

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS
Roseville, Ca.

BACK ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION BACK PERSPECTIVE
scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (on 24"x36" sheet)
0 4' 8' 16' 24' CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, June 24, 2022 |MR210118.00 July 15, 2022 | MR210118.00

DC EXHIBIT C
2ND FLOOR
1ST FLOOR
3RD FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

TOP OF RIDGE
A2.03
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - APT. BLDG B - 24 PLEX - ALT COLORS Roseville, Ca.

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS
Roseville, Ca.

FRONT ELEVATION

LEFT ELEVATION FRONT PERSPECTIVE
scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (on 24"x36" sheet)
0 4' 8' 16' 24' CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, June 24, 2022 |MR210118.00 July 15, 2022 | MR210118.00

DC EXHIBIT C
2ND FLOOR
1ST FLOOR
3RD FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

TOP OF RIDGE
A2.04
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - APT. BLDG B - 24 PLEX - ALT COLORS Roseville, Ca.

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS
Roseville, Ca.

BACK ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION BACK PERSPECTIVE
scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (on 24"x36" sheet)
0 4' 8' 16' 24' CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, June 24, 2022 |MR210118.00 July 15, 2022 | MR210118.00

DC EXHIBIT C
)LUVW/HYHO
7RSRI5RRI
7RSRI3ODWH
A4.01

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - COMMUNITY CLUBHOUSE
5RVHYLOOH&D
:,1',1*&5((.$3$570(176
5RVHYLOOH&D
The drawings presented are illustrative of character and design intent only, and are subject to change based upon final design considerations (i.e. applicable codes, structural, and MEP design requirements, unit plan / floor plan changes, etc.) © 2021 BSB Design, Inc. $SULOˆ_05˙

FRONT ELEVATION

LEFT ELEVATION FRONT PERSPECTIVE
scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (on 24"x36" sheet)
0 4' 8' 16' 24' CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, June 24, 2022 |MR210118.00 July 15, 2022 | MR210118.00

DC EXHIBIT C
First Level
Top of Roof
Top of Plate
A4.02

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - COMMUNITY CLUBHOUSE
Roseville, Ca.

WINDING CREEK APARTMENTS
Roseville, Ca.

BACK ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION BACK PERSPECTIVE
scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (on 24"x36" sheet)
0 4' 8' 16' 24' CREEK APARTMEN 3338 Blue Oaks Avenue - Roseville, June 24, 2022 |MR210118.00 July 15, 2022 | MR210118.00

DC EXHIBIT C

Roseville City CouncilSeptember 20, 2023

Roseville City Council
September 20, 2023