Agenda packet — Roseville City Council, August 20, 2025 (part 3 of 8)

CALAVERAS COUNTY:

Area 1: Except Eastern part
Area 2: Eastern part
COLUSA COUNTY:

Area 1: Eastern part
Area 2: Remainder
DEL NORTE COUNTY:

Area 1: Extreme Southwestern corner
Area 2: Remainder
ELDORADO COUNTY:

Area 1: North Central part
Area 2: Remainder

FRESNO COUNTY
Area 1: Except Eastern part
Area 2: Eastern part
GLENN COUNTY:

Area 1: Eastern part
Area 2: Remainder
HUMBOLDT COUNTY:

Area 1: Except Eastern and Southwestern parts
Area 2: Remainder
LAKE COUNTY:

Area 1: Southern part
Area 2: Remainder
LASSEN COUNTY:

Area 1: Western part along the Southern portion of border with Shasta County
Area 2: Remainder

MADERA COUNTY
Area 1: Remainder
Area 2: Eastern part

MARIPOSA COUNTY
Area 1: Remainder
Area 2: Eastern part
MENDOCINO COUNTY:

Area 1: Central and Southeastern parts
Area 2: Remainder

MONTEREY COUNTY
Area 1: Remainder
Area 2: Southwestern part
NEVADA COUNTY:

Area 1: All but the Northern portion along the border of Sierra County
Area 2: Remainder
PLACER COUNTY:

Area 1: All but the Central portion
Area 2: Remainder
PLUMAS COUNTY:

Area 1: Western portion
Area 2: Remainder
SHASTA COUNTY:

Area 1: All but the Northeastern corner
Area 2: Remainder
SIERRA COUNTY:

Area 1: Western part
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 13/41

Page 249 of 1281 ends

Area 2: Remainder
SISKIYOU COUNTY:

Area 1: Central part
Area 2: Remainder
SONOMA COUNTY:

Area 1: All but the Northwestern corner
Area 2: Reaminder
TEHAMA COUNTY:

Area 1: All but the Western border with mendocino & Trinity Counties
Area 2: Remainder
TRINITY COUNTY:

Area 1: East Central part and the Northeaster border with Shasta County
Area 2: Remainder
TULARE COUNTY;
Area 1: Remainder
Area 2: Eastern part
TUOLUMNE COUNTY:

Area 1: Remainder
Area 2: Eastern Part
---------------------------------------------------------------- ENGI0003-038 06/28/2023
""AREA 1"" WAGE RATES ARE LISTED BELOW
""AREA 2"" RECEIVES AN ADDITIONAL $2.00 PER HOUR ABOVE AREA 1 RATES.

SEE AREA DEFINITIONS BELOW
Rates Fringes
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(AREA 1:)
GROUP 1.....................$ 60.72 31.03
GROUP 2.....................$ 59.19 31.03
GROUP 3.....................$ 57.71 31.03
GROUP 4.....................$ 56.33 31.03
GROUP 5.....................$ 55.06 31.03
GROUP 6.....................$ 53.74 31.03
GROUP 7.....................$ 52.60 31.03
GROUP 8.....................$ 51.46 31.03
GROUP 8-A...................$ 49.25 31.03
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(Cranes and Attachments -
AREA 1:)
GROUP 1
Cranes.....................$ 52.30 31.15
Oiler......................$ 43.79 31.15
Truck crane oiler..........$ 46.08 31.15
GROUP 2
Cranes.....................$ 50.54 31.15
Oiler......................$ 42.83 31.15
Truck crane oiler..........$ 45.07 31.15
GROUP 3
Cranes.....................$ 48.80 31.15
Hydraulic..................$ 44.44 31.15
Oiler......................$ 42.55 31.15
Truck crane oiler..........$ 44.83 31.15
GROUP 4
Cranes.....................$ 45.76 31.15
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(Piledriving - AREA 1:)
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 14/41

Page 250 of 1281 ends

GROUP 1
Lifting devices............$ 52.64 31.15
Oiler......................$ 43.38 31.15
Truck Crane Oiler..........$ 45.66 31.15
GROUP 2
Lifting devices............$ 50.82 31.15
Oiler......................$ 43.11 31.15
Truck Crane Oiler..........$ 45.41 31.15
GROUP 3
Lifting devices............$ 49.14 31.15
Oiler......................$ 42.89 31.15
Truck Crane Oiler..........$ 45.12 31.15
GROUP 4
Lifting devices............$ 47.37 31.15
GROUP 5
Lifting devices............$ 44.73 31.15
GROUP 6
Lifting devices............$ 42.50 31.15
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(Steel Erection - AREA 1:)
GROUP 1
Cranes.....................$ 53.27 31.15
Oiler......................$ 43.72 31.15
Truck Crane Oiler..........$ 45.95 31.15
GROUP 2
Cranes.....................$ 51.50 31.15
Oiler......................$ 43.45 31.15
Truck Crane Oiler..........$ 45.73 31.15
GROUP 3
Cranes.....................$ 50.02 31.15
Hydraulic..................$ 45.07 31.15
Oiler......................$ 43.23 31.15
Truck Crane Oiler..........$ 45.46 31.15
GROUP 4
Cranes.....................$ 48.00 31.15
GROUP 5
Cranes.....................$ 46.70 31.15
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(Tunnel and Underground Work
- AREA 1:)
SHAFTS, STOPES, RAISES:

GROUP 1....................$ 56.82 31.03
GROUP 1-A..................$ 49.99 31.15
GROUP 1A...................$ 59.29 31.03
GROUP 2....................$ 55.56 31.03
GROUP 3....................$ 54.23 31.03
GROUP 4....................$ 53.09 31.03
GROUP 5....................$ 51.95 31.03
UNDERGROUND:

GROUP 1....................$ 47.42 31.15
GROUP 1-A..................$ 49.89 31.15
GROUP 2....................$ 46.16 31.15
GROUP 3....................$ 44.83 31.15
GROUP 4....................$ 43.69 31.15
GROUP 5....................$ 42.55 31.15
FOOTNOTE: Work suspended by ropes or cables, or work on a Yo-Yo Cat: $.60 per hour additional.

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Operator of helicopter (when used in erection work); Hydraulic excavator, 7 cu. yds. and over; Power shovels, over 7 cu. yds.

GROUP 2: Highline cableway; Hydraulic excavator, 3-1/2 cu. yds. up to 7 cu. yds.; Licensed construction work boat
operator, on site; Power blade operator (finish); Power shovels, over 1 cu. yd. up to and including 7 cu. yds.
m.r.c.
7/15/25, 3:23PMSAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/915/41

Page 251 of 1281 ends

GROUP 3: Asphalt milling machine; Cable backhoe; Combination backhoe and loader over 3/4 cu. yds.; Continuous flight tie back machine assistant to engineer or mechanic; Crane
mounted continuous flight tie back machine, tonnage to
apply; Crane mounted drill attachment, tonnage to apply; Dozer, slope brd; Gradall; Hydraulic excavator, up to 3 1/2 cu. yds.; Loader 4 cu. yds. and over; Long reach excavator; Multiple engine scraper (when used as push pull); Power shovels, up to and including 1 cu. yd.; Pre-stress wire wrapping machine; Side boom cat, 572 or larger; Track
loader 4 cu. yds. and over; Wheel excavator (up to and
including 750 cu. yds. per hour)
GROUP 4: Asphalt plant engineer/box person; Chicago boom; Combination backhoe and loader up to and including 3/4 cu. yd.; Concrete batch plant (wet or dry); Dozer and/or push cat; Pull- type elevating loader; Gradesetter, grade
checker (GPS, mechanical or otherwise); Grooving and
grinding machine; Heading shield operator; Heavy-duty
drilling equipment, Hughes, LDH, Watson 3000 or similar; Heavy-duty repairperson and/or welder; Lime spreader;
Loader under 4 cu. yds.; Lubrication and service engineer (mobile and grease rack); Mechanical finishers or spreader machine (asphalt, Barber-Greene and similar); Miller
Formless M-9000 slope paver or similar; Portable crushing and screening plants; Power blade support; Roller operator, asphalt; Rubber-tired scraper, self-loading (paddle-wheels, etc.); Rubber- tired earthmoving equipment (scrapers); Slip form paver (concrete); Small tractor with drag; Soil
stabilizer (P & H or equal); Spider plow and spider puller; Tubex pile rig; Unlicensed constuction work boat operator, on site; Timber skidder; Track loader up to 4 yds.;
Tractor-drawn scraper; Tractor, compressor drill
combination; Welder; Woods-Mixer (and other similar Pugmill equipment)
GROUP 5: Cast-in-place pipe laying machine; Combination slusher and motor operator; Concrete conveyor or concrete pump, truck or equipment mounted; Concrete conveyor,
building site; Concrete pump or pumpcrete gun; Drilling equipment, Watson 2000, Texoma 700 or similar; Drilling and boring machinery, horizontal (not to apply to waterliners, wagon drills or jackhammers); Concrete mixer/all; Person and/or material hoist; Mechanical finishers (concrete)
(Clary, Johnson, Bidwell Bridge Deck or similar types); Mechanical burm, curb and/or curb and gutter machine,
concrete or asphalt); Mine or shaft hoist; Portable
crusher; Power jumbo operator (setting slip-forms, etc., in tunnels); Screed (automatic or manual); Self-propelled
compactor with dozer; Tractor with boom D6 or smaller;
Trenching machine, maximum digging capacity over 5 ft.
depth; Vermeer T-600B rock cutter or similar
GROUP 6: Armor-Coater (or similar); Ballast jack tamper; Boom- type backfilling machine; Assistant plant engineer; Bridge and/or gantry crane; Chemical grouting machine,
truck-mounted; Chip spreading machine operator; Concrete saw (self-propelled unit on streets, highways, airports and canals); Deck engineer; Drilling equipment Texoma 600,
Hughes 200 Series or similar up to and including 30 ft. m.r.c.; Drill doctor; Helicopter radio operator;
Hydro-hammer or similar; Line master; Skidsteer loader, Bobcat larger than 743 series or similar (with
attachments); Locomotive; Lull hi-lift or similar; Oiler, truck mounted equipment; Pavement breaker, truck-mounted, with compressor combination; Paving fabric installation and/or laying machine; Pipe bending machine (pipelines
only); Pipe wrapping machine (tractor propelled and
supported); Screed (except asphaltic concrete paving);
Self- propelled pipeline wrapping machine; Tractor;
Self-loading chipper; Concrete barrier moving machine
7/15/25, 3:23PMSAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/916/41

Page 252 of 1281 ends

GROUP 7: Ballast regulator; Boom truck or dual-purpose
A-frame truck, non-rotating - under 15 tons; Cary lift or similar; Combination slurry mixer and/or cleaner; Drilling equipment, 20 ft. and under m.r.c.; Firetender (hot plant); Grouting machine operator; Highline cableway signalperson; Stationary belt loader (Kolman or similar); Lift slab
machine (Vagtborg and similar types); Maginnes internal full slab vibrator; Material hoist (1 drum); Mechanical trench shield; Pavement breaker with or without compressor combination); Pipe cleaning machine (tractor propelled and supported); Post driver; Roller (except asphalt); Chip
Seal; Self-propelled automatically applied concrete curing mahcine (on streets, highways, airports and canals);
Self-propelled compactor (without dozer); Signalperson; Slip-form pumps (lifting device for concrete forms); Tie spacer; Tower mobile; Trenching machine, maximum digging capacity up to and including 5 ft. depth; Truck- type loader GROUP 8: Bit sharpener; Boiler tender; Box operator;
Brakeperson; Combination mixer and compressor
(shotcrete/gunite); Compressor operator; Deckhand; Fire tender; Forklift (under 20 ft.); Generator;
Gunite/shotcrete equipment operator; Hydraulic monitor; Ken seal machine (or similar); Mixermobile; Oiler; Pump
operator; Refrigeration plant; Reservoir-debris tug (self- propelled floating); Ross Carrier (construction site);
Rotomist operator; Self-propelled tape machine; Shuttlecar; Self-propelled power sweeper operator (includes vacuum
sweeper); Slusher operator; Surface heater; Switchperson; Tar pot firetender; Tugger hoist, single drum; Vacuum
cooling plant; Welding machine (powered other than by
electricity)
GROUP 8-A: Elevator operator; Skidsteer loader-Bobcat 743 series or smaller, and similar (without attachments); Mini excavator under 25 H.P. (backhoe-trencher); Tub grinder wood chipper
----------------------------------------------------------

ALL CRANES AND ATTACHMENTS
GROUP 1: Clamshell and dragline over 7 cu. yds.; Crane, over 100 tons; Derrick, over 100 tons; Derrick barge
pedestal-mounted, over 100 tons; Self-propelled boom-type lifting device, over 100 tons
GROUP 2: Clamshell and dragline over 1 cu. yd. up to and including 7 cu. yds.; Crane, over 45 tons up to and
including 100 tons; Derrick barge, 100 tons and under;
Self-propelled boom-type lifting device, over 45 tons;
Tower crane
GROUP 3: Clamshell and dragline up to and including 1 cu. yd.; Cranes 45 tons and under; Self-propelled boom-type lifting device 45 tons and under;
GROUP 4: Boom Truck or dual purpose A-frame truck,
non-rotating over 15 tons; Truck-mounted rotating
telescopic boom type lifting device, Manitex or similar (boom truck) over 15 tons; Truck-mounted rotating
telescopic boom type lifting device, Manitex or similar (boom truck) - under 15 tons;
-----------------------------------------------------------

PILEDRIVERS
GROUP 1: Derrick barge pedestal mounted over 100 tons;
Clamshell over 7 cu. yds.; Self-propelled boom-type lifting device over 100 tons; Truck crane or crawler, land or barge mounted over 100 tons
7/15/25, 3:23PMSAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/917/41

Page 253 of 1281 ends

GROUP 2: Derrick barge pedestal mounted 45 tons to and
including 100 tons; Clamshell up to and including 7 cu. yds.; Self-propelled boom-type lifting device over 45 tons; Truck crane or crawler, land or barge mounted, over 45 tons up to and including 100 tons; Fundex F-12 hydraulic pile rig GROUP 3: Derrick barge pedestal mounted under 45 tons; Self- propelled boom-type lifting device 45 tons and under;
Skid/scow piledriver, any tonnage; Truck crane or crawler, land or barge mounted 45 tons and under
GROUP 4: Assistant operator in lieu of assistant to engineer; Forklift, 10 tons and over; Heavy-duty repairperson/welder GROUP 5: Deck engineer
GROUP 6: Deckhand; Fire tender
-------------------------------------------------------------

STEEL ERECTORS
GROUP 1: Crane over 100 tons; Derrick over 100 tons; Self- propelled boom-type lifting device over 100 tons
GROUP 2: Crane over 45 tons to 100 tons; Derrick under 100 tons; Self-propelled boom-type lifting device over 45 tons to 100 tons; Tower crane
GROUP 3: Crane, 45 tons and under; Self-propelled boom-type lifting device, 45 tons and under
GROUP 4: Chicago boom; Forklift, 10 tons and over; Heavy-duty repair person/welder
GROUP 5: Boom cat
-------------------------------------------------------------- --

TUNNEL AND UNDERGROUND WORK
GROUP 1-A: Tunnel bore machine operator, 20' diameter or more

GROUP 1: Heading shield operator; Heavy-duty repairperson; Mucking machine (rubber tired, rail or track type); Raised bore operator (tunnels); Tunnel mole bore operator
GROUP 2: Combination slusher and motor operator; Concrete pump or pumpcrete gun; Power jumbo operator
GROUP 3: Drill doctor; Mine or shaft hoist
GROUP 4: Combination slurry mixer cleaner; Grouting Machine operator; Motorman
GROUP 5: Bit Sharpener; Brakeman; Combination mixer and compressor (gunite); Compressor operator; Oiler; Pump
operator; Slusher operator
----------------------------------------------------------- AREA DESCRIPTIONS:

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATORS, CRANES AND ATTACHMENTS,TUNNEL AND UNDERGROUND [These areas do not apply to Piledrivers and Steel Erectors]
AREA 1: DEL NORTE, HUMBOLDT, LAKE, MENDOCINO
AREA 2 -NOTED BELOW
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 18/41

Page 254 of 1281 ends

THE REMAINING COUNTIES ARE SPLIT BETWEEN AREA 1 AND AREA 2 AS NOTED BELOW:

DEL NORTE COUNTY:

Area 1: Extreme Southwest corner
Area 2: Remainder
HUMBOLDT COUNTY:

Area 1: Except Eastern and Southwestern parts
Area 2: Remainder
LAKE COUNTY:

Area 1: Southern part
Area 2: Remainder
MENDOCINO COUNTY:

Area 1: Central and Southeastern Parts
Area 2: Remainder
---------------------------------------------------------------- IRON0118-012 01/01/2025
ALPINE, LASSEN, MODOC, SISKIYOU and TRINITY COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKER.......................$ 43.75 34.45
---------------------------------------------------------------- IRON0118-013 01/01/2025

AMADOR, BUTTE, COLUSA,EL DORADO, GLENN,MARIN, NAPA, NEVADA,

PLACER,PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA, SIERRA, SOLANO, SONOMA, SUTTER, TEHAMA, YOLO and YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKER.......................$ 50.70 35.15
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0067-003 07/01/2024
AREA ""1"" - MARIN and NAPA COUNTIES
AREA ""2"" - ALPINE, AMADOR, BUTTE COLUSA EL DORADO, GLENN,

LASSEN, MODOC, NEVADA, PLACER, PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA,

SIERRA, SISKIYOU, SOLANO, SONOMA, SUTTER, TEHAMA, TRINITY,

YOLO, AND YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes

LABORER (ASBESTOS/MOLD/LEAD

LABORER)
Marin and Napa Counties.....$ 37.75 29.69
Remaining Counties..........$ 36.75 29.69
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0067-005 01/01/2024
AREA ""A"" - ALAMEDA, CONTRA COSTA, SAN FRANCISCO, SAN MATEO AND

SANTA CLARA COUNTIES
AREA ""B"" - ALPINE, AMADOR, BUTTE, CALAVERAS, COLUSA, DEL

NORTE, EL DORADO, FRESNO, GLENN, HUMBOLDT, KINGS, LAKE, LASSEN,

MADERA, MARIPOSA, MENDOCINO, MERCED, MODOC, MONTEREY, NEVADA,

PLACER, PLUMAS, SANCREMENTO, SAN BENITO, SAN JOAQUIN, SANTA

CRUZ, SIERRA, SHASTA, SISKIYOU, STANISLAUS, TEHAMA, TRINITY,

TULARE, TUOLUMNE, YOLO AND YOUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes

LABORER (TRAFFIC CONTROL/LANE
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 19/41

Page 255 of 1281 ends

CLOSURE)
Escort Driver, Flag Person
Area A.....................$ 37.26 27.32
Area B.....................$ 36.26 27.32
Traffic Control Person I
Area A.....................$ 37.56 27.32
Area B.....................$ 36.56 27.32
Traffic Control Person II
Area A.....................$ 35.06 27.32
Area B.....................$ 34.06 27.32
TRAFFIC CONTROL PERSON I: Layout of traffic control, crash cushions, construction area and roadside signage.

TRAFFIC CONTROL PERSON II: Installation and removal of
temporary/permanent signs, markers, delineators and crash cushions.
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0185-002 07/01/2023

ALPINE, AMADOR, BUTTE, COLUSA, EL DORADO, GLENN, LASSEN, MODOC,

NEVADA, PLACER, PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA, SIERRA, SISKIYOU,

SUTTER, TEHAMA, TRINITY, YOLO AND YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes

LABORER
Mason Tender-Brick..........$ 36.29 25.55
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0185-005 06/26/2023

ALPINE, AMADOR, BUTTE, COLUSA, EL DORADO, GLENN, LASSEN, MODOC,

NEVADA, PLACER, PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA, SIERRA, SISKIYOU,

SUTTER, TEHAMA, TRINITY, YOLO AND YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Tunnel and Shaft Laborers:

GROUP 1.....................$ 45.89 27.72
GROUP 2.....................$ 45.66 27.72
GROUP 3.....................$ 45.41 27.72
GROUP 4.....................$ 44.96 27.72
GROUP 5.....................$ 44.42 27.72
Shotcrete Specialist........$ 46.41 27.72

TUNNEL AND SHAFT CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Diamond driller; Groundmen; Gunite and shotcrete nozzlemen
GROUP 2: Rodmen; Shaft work & raise (below actual or
excavated ground level)
GROUP 3: Bit grinder; Blaster, driller, powdermen, heading; Cherry pickermen - where car is lifted; Concrete finisher in tunnel; Concrete screedman; Grout pumpman and potman; Gunite & shotcrete gunman & potman; Headermen; High
pressure nozzleman; Miner - tunnel, including top and
bottom man on shaft and raise work; Nipper; Nozzleman on slick line; Sandblaster - potman, Robotic Shotcrete Placer, Segment Erector, Tunnel Muck Hauler, Steel Form raiser and setter; Timberman, retimberman (wood or steel or substitute materials therefore); Tugger (for tunnel laborer work); Cable tender; Chuck tender; Powderman - primer house
GROUP 4: Vibrator operator, pavement breaker; Bull gang - muckers, trackmen; Concrete crew - includes rodding and spreading, Dumpmen (any method)
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 20/41

Page 256 of 1281 ends

GROUP 5: Grout crew; Reboundman; Swamper/ Brakeman
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0185-006 06/26/2023

ALPINE, AMADOR, BUTTE, COLUSA, EL DORADO, GLENN, LASSEN, MODOC,

NEVADA, PLACER, PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHIASTA, SIERRA, SISKIYOU,

SUTTER, TEHAMA, TRINITY, YOLO, YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes

LABORER (CONSTRUCTION CRAFT
LABORERS - AREA B:)
Construction Specialist
Group.......................$ 36.20 27.30
GROUP 1.....................$ 35.50 27.30
GROUP 1-a...................$ 35.72 27.30
GROUP 1-c...................$ 35.55 27.30
GROUP 1-e...................$ 36.05 27.30
GROUP 1-f...................$ 30.37 23.20
GROUP 2.....................$ 35.35 27.30
GROUP 3.....................$ 35.25 27.30
GROUP 4.....................$ 28.94 27.30
See groups 1-b and 1-d under laborer classifications.

LABORER (GARDENERS,

HORTICULTURAL & LANDSCAPE
LABORERS - AREA B:)
(1) New Construction........$ 35.25 27.30
(2) Establishment Warranty
Period......................$ 28.94 27.30
LABORER (GUNITE - AREA B:)
GROUP 1.....................$ 36.46 27.30
GROUP 2.....................$ 35.96 27.30
GROUP 3.....................$ 35.37 27.30
GROUP 4.....................$ 35.25 27.30
LABORER (WRECKING - AREA B:)
GROUP 1.....................$ 35.50 27.30
GROUP 2.....................$ 35.35 27.30
FOOTNOTES:

Laborers working off or with or from bos'n chairs, swinging scaffolds, belts shall receive $0.25 per hour above the applicable wage rate. This shall not apply to workers
entitled to receive the wage rate set forth in Group 1-a below.
---------------------------------------------------------

Page 257 of 1281 ends

worker applying asphalt, lay-kold, creosote, lime, caustic and similar type materials (applying means applying,
dipping or handling of such materials); Lagging, sheeting, whaling, bracing, trenchjacking, lagging hammer; Magnesite, epoxyresin, fiberglass, mastic worker (wet or dry); No
joint pipe and stripping of same, including repair of
voids; Pavement breaker and spader, including tool grinder; Perma curb; Pipelayer (including grade checking in
connection with pipelaying); Precast-manhole setter;
Pressure pipe tester; Post hole digger, air, gas and
electric; Power broom sweeper; Power tampers of all types (except as shown in Group 2); Ram set gun and stud gun; Riprap stonepaver and rock-slinger, including placing of sacked concrete and/or sand (wet or dry) and gabions and similar type; Rotary scarifier or multiple head concrete chipping scarifier; Roto and Ditch Witch; Rototiller;
Sandblaster, pot, gun, nozzle operators; Signalling and rigging; Tank cleaner; Tree climber; Turbo blaster;
Vibrascreed, bull float in connection with laborers' work; Vibrator; Hazardous waste worker (lead removal); Asbestos and mold removal worker
GROUP 1-a: Joy drill model TWM-2A; Gardner-Denver model DH143 and similar type drills; Track driller; Jack leg driller; Wagon driller; Mechanical drillers, all types regardless of type or method of power; Mechanical pipe layers, all types regardless of type or method of power; Blaster and powder; All work of loading, placing and blasting of all powder and explosives of whatever type regardless of method used for such loading and placing; High scalers (including drilling of same); Tree topper; Bit grinder
GROUP 1-b: Sewer cleaners shall receive $4.00 per day above Group 1 wage rates. ""Sewer cleaner"" means any worker who handles or comes in contact with raw sewage in small
diameter sewers. Those who work inside recently active, large diameter sewers, and all recently active sewer
manholes shal receive $5.00 per day above Group 1 wage
rates.

GROUP 1-c: Burning and welding in connection with laborers' work; Synthetic thermoplastics and similar type welding GROUP 1-d: Maintenance and repair track and road beds. All employees performing work covered herein shall receive $ .25 per hour above their regular rate for all work
performed on underground structures not specifically
covered herein. This paragraph shall not be construed to apply to work below ground level in open cut. It shall
apply to cut and cover work of subway construction after the temporary cover has been placed.

GROUP 1-e: Work on and/or in bell hole footings and shafts thereof, and work on and in deep footings. (A deep footing is a hole 15 feet or more in depth.) In the event the
depth of the footing is unknown at the commencement of
excavation, and the final depth exceeds 15 feet, the deep footing wage rate would apply to all employees for each and every day worked on or in the excavation of the footing from the date of inception.

Page 258 of 1281 ends

construction; Pittsburgh chipper and similar type brush shredders; Sloper; Single foot, hand-held, pneumatic
tamper; All pneumatic, air, gas and electric tools not
listed in Groups 1 through 1-f; Jacking of pipe - under 12 inches
GROUP 3: Construction laborers, including bridge and general laborer; Dump, load spotter; Flag person; Fire watcher; Fence erector; Guardrail erector; Gardener, horticultural and landscape laborer; Jetting; Limber, brush loader and piler; Pavement marker (button setter); Maintenance, repair track and road beds; Streetcar and railroad construction track laborer; Temporary air and water lines, Victaulic or similar; Tool room attendant (jobsite only)
GROUP 4: Final clean-up work of debris, grounds and building including but not limited to: street cleaner; cleaning and washing windows; brick cleaner (jobsite only); material cleaner (jobsite only). The classification ""material
cleaner"" is to be utilized under the following conditions:

A: at demolition site for the salvage of the material.

B: at the conclusion of a job where the material is to be salvaged and stocked to be reused on another job.

C: for the cleaning of salvage material at the jobsite or temporary jobsite yard.

The material cleaner classification should not be used in the performance of ""form stripping, cleaning and oiling and moving to the next point of erection"".
--------------------------------------------------------

GUNITE LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Structural Nozzleman
GROUP 2: Nozzleman, Gunman, Potman, Groundman
GROUP 3: Reboundman
GROUP 4: Gunite laborer
----------------------------------------------------------

WRECKING WORK LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Skilled wrecker (removing and salvaging of sash, windows and materials)
GROUP 2: Semi-skilled wrecker (salvaging of other building materials)
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0185-008 07/01/2023
Rates Fringes
Plasterer tender.................$ 39.77 28.54
Work on a swing stage scaffold: $1.00 per hour additional. ---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0261-002 07/01/2023

MARIN COUNTY
Rates Fringes

LABORER (TRAFFIC CONTROL/LANE

CLOSURE)
Escort Driver, Flag Person..$ 37.26 27.30
Traffic Control Person I....$ 37.56 27.30
Traffic Control Person II...$ 35.06 27.30
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 23/41

Page 259 of 1281 ends

TRAFFIC CONTROL PERSON I: Layout of traffic control, crash cushions, construction area and roadside signage.

MARIN COUNTY
Rates Fringes
Tunnel and Shaft Laborers:

TUNNEL AND SHAFT CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Diamond driller; Groundmen; Gunite and shotcrete nozzlemen
GROUP 2: Rodmen; Shaft work & raise (below actual or
excavated ground level)
GROUP 3: Bit grinder; Blaster, driller, powdermen, heading; Cherry pickermen - where car is lifted; Concrete finisher in tunnel; Concrete screedman; Grout pumpman and potman; Gunite & shotcrete gunman & potman; Headermen; High
pressure nozzleman; Miner - tunnel, including top and
bottom man on shaft and raise work; Nipper; Nozzleman on slick line; Sandblaster - potman, Robotic Shotcrete Placer, Segment Erector, Tunnel Muck Hauler, Steel Form raiser and setter; Timberman, retimberman (wood or steel or substitute materials therefore); Tugger (for tunnel laborer work); Cable tender; Chuck tender; Powderman - primer house
GROUP 4: Vibrator operator, pavement breaker; Bull gang - muckers, trackmen; Concrete crew - includes rodding and spreading, Dumpmen (any method)
GROUP 5: Grout crew; Reboundman; Swamper/ Brakeman
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0261-007 07/01/2023

MARIN COUNTY
Rates Fringes

LABORER
Mason Tender-Brick..........$ 37.54 25.55
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0261-010 06/26/2023

MARIN COUNTY
Rates Fringes

LABORER (CONSTRUCTION CRAFT
LABORERS - AREA A:)
Construction Specialist
Group.......................$ 37.20 27.30
GROUP 1.....................$ 36.50 27.30
GROUP 1-a...................$ 36.72 27.30
GROUP 1-c...................$ 36.55 27.30
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 24/41

Page 260 of 1281 ends

GROUP 1-e...................$ 37.05 27.30
GROUP 1-f...................$ 31.37 23.20
GROUP 2.....................$ 36.35 27.30
GROUP 3.....................$ 36.25 27.30
GROUP 4.....................$ 29.94 27.30
See groups 1-b and 1-d under laborer classifications.

LABORER (GARDENERS,

HORTICULTURAL & LANDSCAPE
LABORERS - AREA A:)
(1) New Construction........$ 36.25 27.30
(2) Establishment Warranty
Period......................$ 29.94 27.30
LABORER (GUNITE - AREA A:)
GROUP 1.....................$ 37.46 27.30
GROUP 2.....................$ 36.96 27.30
GROUP 3.....................$ 36.37 27.30
GROUP 4.....................$ 36.25 27.30
LABORER (WRECKING - AREA A:)
GROUP 1.....................$ 36.50 27.30
GROUP 2.....................$ 36.35 27.30
FOOTNOTES:

LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
CONSTRUCTION SPECIALIST GROUP: Asphalt ironer and raker; Chainsaw; Laser beam in connection with laborers' work; Cast-in- place manhole form setter; Pressure pipelayer; Davis trencher - 300 or similar type (and all small
trenchers); Blaster; Diamond driller; Multiple unit drill; Hydraulic drill
GROUP 1: Asphalt spreader boxes (all types); Barko, Wacker and similar type tampers; Buggymobile; Caulker, bander, pipewrapper, conduit layer, plastic pipelayer; Certified hazardous waste worker including Leade Abatement;
Compactors of all types; Concrete and magnesite mixer, 1/2 yd. and under; Concrete pan work; Concrete sander; Concrete saw; Cribber and/or shoring; Cut granite curb setter;
Dri-pak-it machine; Faller, logloader and bucker; Form
raiser, slip forms; Green cutter; Headerboard, Hubsetter, aligner, by any method; High pressure blow pipe (1-1/2"" or over, 100 lbs. pressure/over); Hydro seeder and similar type; Jackhammer operator; Jacking of pipe over 12 inches; Jackson and similar type compactor; Kettle tender, pot and worker applying asphalt, lay-kold, creosote, lime, caustic and similar type materials (applying means applying,
dipping or handling of such materials); Lagging, sheeting, whaling, bracing, trenchjacking, lagging hammer; Magnesite, epoxyresin, fiberglass, mastic worker (wet or dry); No
joint pipe and stripping of same, including repair of
voids; Pavement breaker and spader, including tool grinder; Perma curb; Pipelayer (including grade checking in
connection with pipelaying); Precast-manhole setter;
Pressure pipe tester; Post hole digger, air, gas and
electric; Power broom sweeper; Power tampers of all types (except as shown in Group 2); Ram set gun and stud gun; Riprap stonepaver and rock-slinger, including placing of sacked concrete and/or sand (wet or dry) and gabions and similar type; Rotary scarifier or multiple head concrete chipping scarifier; Roto and Ditch Witch; Rototiller;
Sandblaster, pot, gun, nozzle operators; Signalling and rigging; Tank cleaner; Tree climber; Turbo blaster;
Vibrascreed, bull float in connection with laborers' work; 7/15/25, 3:23PMSAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/925/41

Page 261 of 1281 ends

Vibrator; Hazardous waste worker (lead removal); Asbestos and mold removal worker
GROUP 1-a: Joy drill model TWM-2A; Gardner-Denver model DH143 and similar type drills; Track driller; Jack leg driller; Wagon driller; Mechanical drillers, all types regardless of type or method of power; Mechanical pipe layers, all types regardless of type or method of power; Blaster and powder; All work of loading, placing and blasting of all powder and explosives of whatever type regardless of method used for such loading and placing; High scalers (including drilling of same); Tree topper; Bit grinder
GROUP 1-b: Sewer cleaners shall receive $4.00 per day above Group 1 wage rates. ""Sewer cleaner"" means any worker who handles or comes in contact with raw sewage in small
diameter sewers. Those who work inside recently active, large diameter sewers, and all recently active sewer
manholes shal receive $5.00 per day above Group 1 wage
rates.

GROUP 1-f: Wire winding machine in connection with guniting or shot crete
GROUP 2: Asphalt shoveler; Cement dumper and handling dry cement or gypsum; Choke-setter and rigger (clearing work); Concrete bucket dumper and chute; Concrete chipping and grinding; Concrete laborer (wet or dry); Driller tender, chuck tender, nipper; Guinea chaser (stake), grout crew; High pressure nozzle, adductor; Hydraulic monitor (over 100 lbs. pressure); Loading and unloading, carrying and hauling of all rods and materials for use in reinforcing concrete construction; Pittsburgh chipper and similar type brush shredders; Sloper; Single foot, hand-held, pneumatic
tamper; All pneumatic, air, gas and electric tools not
listed in Groups 1 through 1-f; Jacking of pipe - under 12 inches
GROUP 3: Construction laborers, including bridge and general laborer; Dump, load spotter; Flag person; Fire watcher; Fence erector; Guardrail erector; Gardener, horticultural and landscape laborer; Jetting; Limber, brush loader and piler; Pavement marker (button setter); Maintenance, repair track and road beds; Streetcar and railroad construction track laborer; Temporary air and water lines, Victaulic or similar; Tool room attendant (jobsite only)
GROUP 4: Final clean-up work of debris, grounds and building including but not limited to: street cleaner; cleaning and washing windows; brick cleaner (jobsite only); material cleaner (jobsite only). The classification ""material
7/15/25, 3:23PMSAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/926/41

Page 262 of 1281 ends

cleaner"" is to be utilized under the following conditions:

A: at demolition site for the salvage of the material.

B: at the conclusion of a job where the material is to be salvaged and stocked to be reused on another job.

C: for the cleaning of salvage material at the jobsite or temporary jobsite yard.

WRECKING WORK LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Skilled wrecker (removing and salvaging of sash, windows and materials)
GROUP 2: Semi-skilled wrecker (salvaging of other building materials)
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0261-015 07/01/2023
Rates Fringes
Plasterer tender.................$ 39.77 28.54
Work on a swing stage scaffold: $1.00 per hour additional. ---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0324-004 07/01/2023

NAPA, SOLANO, AND SONOMA, COUNTIES
Rates Fringes

LABORER (TRAFFIC CONTROL/LANE

CLOSURE)
Escort Driver, Flag Person..$ 36.26 27.30
Traffic Control Person I....$ 36.56 27.30
Traffic Control Person II...$ 34.06 27.30
TRAFFIC CONTROL PERSON I: Layout of traffic control, crash cushions, construction area and roadside signage.

NAPA, SOLANO, AND SONOMA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Tunnel and Shaft Laborers:

GROUP 1.....................$ 45.89 27.72
GROUP 2.....................$ 45.66 27.72
GROUP 3.....................$ 45.41 27.72
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 27/41

Page 263 of 1281 ends

GROUP 4.....................$ 44.96 27.72
GROUP 5.....................$ 44.42 27.72
Shotcrete Specialist........$ 46.41 27.72

TUNNEL AND SHAFT CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Diamond driller; Groundmen; Gunite and shotcrete nozzlemen
GROUP 2: Rodmen; Shaft work & raise (below actual or
excavated ground level)
GROUP 3: Bit grinder; Blaster, driller, powdermen, heading; Cherry pickermen - where car is lifted; Concrete finisher in tunnel; Concrete screedman; Grout pumpman and potman; Gunite & shotcrete gunman & potman; Headermen; High
pressure nozzleman; Miner - tunnel, including top and
bottom man on shaft and raise work; Nipper; Nozzleman on slick line; Sandblaster - potman, Robotic Shotcrete Placer, Segment Erector, Tunnel Muck Hauler, Steel Form raiser and setter; Timberman, retimberman (wood or steel or substitute materials therefore); Tugger (for tunnel laborer work); Cable tender; Chuck tender; Powderman - primer house
GROUP 4: Vibrator operator, pavement breaker; Bull gang - muckers, trackmen; Concrete crew - includes rodding and spreading, Dumpmen (any method)
GROUP 5: Grout crew; Reboundman; Swamper/ Brakeman
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0324-010 07/01/2023

SOLANO AND SONOMA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes

LABORER
Mason Tender-Brick..........$ 36.84 26.24
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0324-013 06/26/2023

NAPA, SOLANO, AND SONOMA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes

LABORER (CONSTRUCTION CRAFT
LABORERS - AREA B:)
Construction Specialist
Group.......................$ 36.20 27.30
GROUP 1.....................$ 35.50 27.30
GROUP 1-a...................$ 35.72 27.30
GROUP 1-c...................$ 35.55 27.30
GROUP 1-e...................$ 36.05 27.30
GROUP 1-f...................$ 36.08 27.30
GROUP 2.....................$ 35.35 27.30
GROUP 3.....................$ 35.25 27.30
GROUP 4.....................$ 28.94 27.30
See groups 1-b and 1-d under laborer classifications.

LABORER (GARDENERS,

HORTICULTURAL & LANDSCAPE
LABORERS - AREA B:)
(1) New Construction........$ 35.25 27.30
(2) Establishment Warranty
Period......................$ 28.94 27.30
LABORER (GUNITE - AREA B:)
GROUP 1.....................$ 36.46 27.30
GROUP 2.....................$ 35.96 27.30
GROUP 3.....................$ 35.37 27.30
GROUP 4.....................$ 35.25 27.30
LABORER (WRECKING - AREA B:)
GROUP 1.....................$ 35.50 27.30
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 28/41

Page 264 of 1281 ends

GROUP 2.....................$ 35.35 27.30
FOOTNOTES:

LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
CONSTRUCTION SPECIALIST GROUP: Asphalt ironer and raker; Chainsaw; Laser beam in connection with laborers' work; Cast-in- place manhole form setter; Pressure pipelayer; Davis trencher - 300 or similar type (and all small
trenchers); Blaster; Diamond driller; Multiple unit drill; Hydraulic drill
GROUP 1: Asphalt spreader boxes (all types); Barko, Wacker and similar type tampers; Buggymobile; Caulker, bander, pipewrapper, conduit layer, plastic pipelayer; Certified hazardous waste worker including Leade Abatement;
Compactors of all types; Concrete and magnesite mixer, 1/2 yd. and under; Concrete pan work; Concrete sander; Concrete saw; Cribber and/or shoring; Cut granite curb setter;
Dri-pak-it machine; Faller, logloader and bucker; Form
raiser, slip forms; Green cutter; Headerboard, Hubsetter, aligner, by any method; High pressure blow pipe (1-1/2"" or over, 100 lbs. pressure/over); Hydro seeder and similar type; Jackhammer operator; Jacking of pipe over 12 inches; Jackson and similar type compactor; Kettle tender, pot and worker applying asphalt, lay-kold, creosote, lime, caustic and similar type materials (applying means applying,
dipping or handling of such materials); Lagging, sheeting, whaling, bracing, trenchjacking, lagging hammer; Magnesite, epoxyresin, fiberglass, mastic worker (wet or dry); No
joint pipe and stripping of same, including repair of
voids; Pavement breaker and spader, including tool grinder; Perma curb; Pipelayer (including grade checking in
connection with pipelaying); Precast-manhole setter;
Pressure pipe tester; Post hole digger, air, gas and
electric; Power broom sweeper; Power tampers of all types (except as shown in Group 2); Ram set gun and stud gun; Riprap stonepaver and rock-slinger, including placing of sacked concrete and/or sand (wet or dry) and gabions and similar type; Rotary scarifier or multiple head concrete chipping scarifier; Roto and Ditch Witch; Rototiller;
Sandblaster, pot, gun, nozzle operators; Signalling and rigging; Tank cleaner; Tree climber; Turbo blaster;
Vibrascreed, bull float in connection with laborers' work; Vibrator; Hazardous waste worker (lead removal); Asbestos and mold removal worker
GROUP 1-a: Joy drill model TWM-2A; Gardner-Denver model DH143 and similar type drills; Track driller; Jack leg driller; Wagon driller; Mechanical drillers, all types regardless of type or method of power; Mechanical pipe layers, all types regardless of type or method of power; Blaster and powder; All work of loading, placing and blasting of all powder and explosives of whatever type regardless of method used for such loading and placing; High scalers (including drilling of same); Tree topper; Bit grinder
GROUP 1-b: Sewer cleaners shall receive $4.00 per day above Group 1 wage rates. ""Sewer cleaner"" means any worker who handles or comes in contact with raw sewage in small
diameter sewers. Those who work inside recently active, large diameter sewers, and all recently active sewer
manholes shal receive $5.00 per day above Group 1 wage
7/15/25, 3:23PMSAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/929/41

Page 265 of 1281 ends

rates.

GROUP 1-f: Wire winding machine in connection with guniting or shot crete
GROUP 2: Asphalt shoveler; Cement dumper and handling dry cement or gypsum; Choke-setter and rigger (clearing work); Concrete bucket dumper and chute; Concrete chipping and grinding; Concrete laborer (wet or dry); Driller tender, chuck tender, nipper; Guinea chaser (stake), grout crew; High pressure nozzle, adductor; Hydraulic monitor (over 100 lbs. pressure); Loading and unloading, carrying and hauling of all rods and materials for use in reinforcing concrete construction; Pittsburgh chipper and similar type brush shredders; Sloper; Single foot, hand-held, pneumatic
tamper; All pneumatic, air, gas and electric tools not
listed in Groups 1 through 1-f; Jacking of pipe - under 12 inches
GROUP 3: Construction laborers, including bridge and general laborer; Dump, load spotter; Flag person; Fire watcher; Fence erector; Guardrail erector; Gardener, horticultural and landscape laborer; Jetting; Limber, brush loader and piler; Pavement marker (button setter); Maintenance, repair track and road beds; Streetcar and railroad construction track laborer; Temporary air and water lines, Victaulic or similar; Tool room attendant (jobsite only)
GROUP 4: Final clean-up work of debris, grounds and building including but not limited to: street cleaner; cleaning and washing windows; brick cleaner (jobsite only); material cleaner (jobsite only). The classification ""material
cleaner"" is to be utilized under the following conditions:

A: at demolition site for the salvage of the material.

B: at the conclusion of a job where the material is to be salvaged and stocked to be reused on another job.

C: for the cleaning of salvage material at the jobsite or temporary jobsite yard.

GUNITE LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Structural Nozzleman
GROUP 2: Nozzleman, Gunman, Potman, Groundman
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 30/41

Page 266 of 1281 ends

GROUP 3: Reboundman
GROUP 4: Gunite laborer
----------------------------------------------------------

WRECKING WORK LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Skilled wrecker (removing and salvaging of sash, windows and materials)
GROUP 2: Semi-skilled wrecker (salvaging of other building materials)
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0324-019 07/01/2023
Rates Fringes
Plasterer tender.................$ 39.77 28.54
Work on a swing stage scaffold: $1.00 per hour additional. ---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0016-004 01/01/2025

MARIN, NAPA, SOLANO & SONOMA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Painters:........................$ 53.38 28.04
PREMIUMS:

EXOTIC MATERIALS - $1.25 additional per hour.

SPRAY WORK: - $0.50 additional per hour.

INDUSTRIAL PAINTING - $0.25 additional per hour
[Work on industrial buildings used for the manufacture and processing of goods for sale or service; steel construction (bridges), stacks, towers, tanks, and similar structures] HIGH WORK:
over 50 feet - $2.00 per hour additional
100 to 180 feet - $4.00 per hour additional
Over 180 feet - $6.00 per houir additional
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0016-005 01/01/2025
ALPINE, BUTTE, COLUSA, EL DORADO (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains), GLENN, LASSEN (west of Hwy. 395, excluding Honey Lake); MARIN, MODOC, NAPA, NEVADA (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains), PLACER (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains), PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA, SIERRA (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains), SISKIYOU, SOLANO, SONOMA, SUTTER, TEHAMA, TRINITY,

YOLO AND YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
DRYWALL FINISHER/TAPER...........$ 59.63 31.29
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0016-007 01/01/2025
ALPINE, AMADOR, BUTTE, COLUSA. EL DORADO (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains), GLENN, LASSEN (west of Highway 395,
excluding Honey Lake), MODOC, NEVADA (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains), PLACER (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains), PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA, SIERRA (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains), SISKIYOU, SUTTER, TEHAMA, TRINITY, YOLO & YUBA

COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 31/41

Page 267 of 1281 ends

Painters:........................$ 43.45 22.80
SPRAY/SANDBLAST: $0.50 additional per hour.

EXOTIC MATERIALS: $1.25 additional per hour.

HIGH TIME: Over 50 ft above ground or water level $2.00 additional per hour. 100 to 180 ft above ground or water level $4.00 additional per hour. Over 180 ft above ground or water level $6.00 additional per hour.
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0016-008 01/01/2024

MARIN, NAPA, SOLANO AND SONOMA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
SOFT FLOOR LAYER.................$ 59.00 33.03
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0169-004 01/01/2024
MARIN , NAPA & SONOMA COUNTIES; SOLANO COUNTY (west of a line defined as follows: Hwy. 80 corridor beginning at the City of Fairfield, including Travis Air Force Base and Suisun City; going north of Manakas Corner Rd., continue north on Suisun Valley Rd. to the Napa County line; Hwy. 80 corridor south on Grizzly Island Rd. to the Grizzly Island Management area) Rates Fringes
GLAZIER..........................$ 56.22 34.00
---------------------------------------------------------------- * PAIN0567-001 07/01/2024
EL DORADO COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada Mountains); LASSEN COUNTY (east of Highway 395, beginning at Stacey and including Honey Lake); NEVADA COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada
Mountains); PLACER COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada
Mountains); AND SIERRA COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada Mountains)
Rates Fringes
Painters:

Brush and Roller............$ 36.87 15.82
Spray Painter & Paperhanger.$ 38.87 15.82
PREMIUMS:

Special Coatings (Brush), and Sandblasting = $0.50/hr
Special Coatings (Spray), and Steeplejack = $1.00/hr
Special Coating Spray Steel = $1.25/hr
Swing Stage = $2.00/hr
*A special coating is a coating that requires the mixing of 2 or more products.
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0567-007 07/01/2022
EL DORADO COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada Mountains); LASSEN COUNTY (east of Highway 395, beginning at Stacey and including Honey Lake); NEVADA COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada
Mountains); PLACER COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada Mountains) AND SIERRA COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada Mountains) Rates Fringes
SOFT FLOOR LAYER.................$ 34.27 16.47
---------------------------------------------------------------- 7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 32/41

Page 268 of 1281 ends

PAIN0567-010 07/01/2024
EL DORADO COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada Mountains); LASSEN COUNTY (east of Highway 395, beginning at Stacey and including Honey Lake); NEVADA COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada
Mountains); PLACER COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada
Mountains); AND SIERRA COUNTY (east of the Sierra Nevada Mountains)
Rates Fringes
Drywall
(1) Taper...................$ 42.79 16.12
(2) Steeplejack - Taper,
over 40 ft with open space
below.......................$ 44.29 16.12
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0767-004 01/01/2024

ALPINE, AMADOR, BUTTE, COLUSA, EL DORADO, GLENN, LASSEN, MODOC,

NEVADA, PLACER, PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA, SIERRA, SISKIYOU, SOLANO (Remainder), SUTTER, TEHAMA, TRINITY, YOLO, YUBA Rates Fringes
GLAZIER..........................$ 43.25 35.62
PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, President's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day.

Employee required to wear a body harness shall receive $1.50 per hour above the basic hourly rate at any elevation.
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN1176-001 07/01/2022
HIGHWAY IMPR0VEMENT
Rates Fringes
Parking Lot Striping/Highway
Marking:

GROUP 1.....................$ 40.83 17.62
GROUP 2.....................$ 34.71 17.62
GROUP 3.....................$ 35.11 17.62

CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Striper: Layout and application of painted traffic stripes and marking; hot thermo plastic; tape, traffic
stripes and markings
GROUP 2: Gamecourt & Playground Installer
GROUP 3: Protective Coating, Pavement Sealing
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN1237-001 01/01/2024
ALPINE; COLUSA; EL DORADO (west of the Sierra Nevada
Mountains); GLENN; LASSEN (west of Highway 395, beginning at Stacey and including Honey Lake); MODOC; NEVADA (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains); PLACER (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains); PLUMAS; SACRAMENTO; SHASTA; SIERRA (west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains); SISKIYOU; SUTTER; TEHAMA; TRINITY;

YOLO AND YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 33/41

Page 269 of 1281 ends

SOFT FLOOR LAYER.................$ 48.54 26.59
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLAS0300-003 07/01/2018
Rates Fringes

PLASTERER
AREA 295: Alpine, Amador,
Butte, Colusa, El Dorado,
Glenn, Lassen, Modoc,
Nevada, Placer, Plumas,
Sacramento, Shasta,
Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano,
Sutter, Tehema, Trinity,
Yolo & Yuba Counties........$ 32.70 31.68
AREA 355: Marin.............$ 36.73 31.68
AREA 355: Napa & Sonoma
Counties....................$ 32.70 31.68
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLAS0300-005 07/01/2016
Rates Fringes
CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 32.15 23.27
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0038-002 07/01/2022

MARIN AND SONOMA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
PLUMBER (Plumber,
Steamfitter, Refrigeration
Fitter)
(1) Work on wooden frame
structures 5 stories or
less excluding high-rise
buildings and commercial
work such as hospitals,
prisons, hotels, schools,
casinos, wastewater
treatment plants, and
resarch facilities as well
as refrigeration
pipefitting, service and
repair work - MARKET
RECOVERY RATE...............$ 69.70 46.38
(2) All other work - NEW
CONSTRUCTION RATE...........$ 82.00 48.18
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0038-006 07/01/2022

MARIN & SONOMA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Landscape/Irrigation Fitter
(Underground/Utility Fitter).....$ 69.70 33.15
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0228-001 01/01/2025

BUTTE, COLUSA, GLENN, LASSEN, MODOC, PLUMAS, SHASTA, SIERRA,

SISKIYOU, SUTTER, TEHAMA, TRINITY & YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
PLUMBER..........................$ 50.00 40.34
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0343-001 07/01/2024
7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 34/41

Page 270 of 1281 ends

NAPA AND SOLANO COUNTIES
Rates Fringes

PLUMBER/PIPEFITTER
Light Commercial............$ 30.85 20.40
All Other Work..............$ 69.60 36.63
DEFINITION OF LIGHT COMMERICIAL:

Work shall include strip shopping centers, office buildings, schools and other commercial structures which the total plumbing bid does not exceed Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand ($250,000) and the total heating and cooling does not
exceed Two Hundred Fifty Thousand ($250,000); or Any
projects bid in phases shall not qualify unless the total project is less than Two Hundred Fifty Thousand ($250,000) for the plumbing bid; and Two Hundred Fifty Thousand
($250,000) for the heating and cooling bid. Excluded are hospitals, jails, institutions and industrial projects, regardless size of the project
FOOTNOTES: While fitting galvanized material: $.75 per hour additional. Work from trusses, temporary staging,
unguarded structures 35' from the ground or water: $.75 per hour additional. Work from swinging scaffolds, boatswains chairs or similar devices: $.75 per hour additional.
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0350-001 08/01/2023
EL DORADO COUNTY (Lake Tahoe area only); NEVADA COUNTY (Lake Tahoe area only); AND PLACER COUNTY (Lake Tahoe area only) Rates Fringes
PLUMBER/PIPEFITTER...............$ 52.14 18.71
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0355-001 07/01/2024

ALPINE, AMADOR, BUTTE, COLUSA, EL DORADO, GLENN, LASSEN, MODOC,

NAPA, NEVADA, PLACER, PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA, SIERRA,

SISKIYOU, SOLANO, SUTTER, TEHAMA, TRINITY, YOLO, AND YUBA

COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Underground Utility Worker
/Landscape Fitter...........$ 34.51 18.30
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0442-003 01/01/2025
AMADOR (South of San Joaquin River) and ALPINE COUNTIES Rates Fringes
PLUMBER..........................$ 55.95 37.64
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0447-001 07/01/2024
AMADOR (north of San Joaquin River), EL DORADO (excluding Lake Tahoe area), NEVADA (excluding Lake Tahoe area); PLACER (excluding Lake Tahoe area), SACRAMENTO AND YOLO COUNTIES Rates Fringes

PLUMBER/PIPEFITTER
Journeyman..................$ 64.37 29.25
Light Commercial Work.......$ 53.08 23.52
---------------------------------------------------------------- 7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 35/41

Page 271 of 1281 ends

ROOF0081-006 08/01/2024

MARIN, NAPA, SOLANO AND SONOMA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Roofer...........................$ 54.94 23.34
---------------------------------------------------------------- ROOF0081-007 08/01/2023

ALPINE, BUTTE, COLUSA, EL DORADO, GLENN,LASSEN, MODOC, NEVADA,

PLACER, PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA, SIERRA, SISKIYOU, SUTTER,

TEHAMA, TRINITY, YOLO, AND YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Roofer...........................$ 46.73 21.36
---------------------------------------------------------------- SFCA0483-003 01/01/2025

MARIN, NAPA, SOLANO AND SONOMA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
SPRINKLER FITTER (Fire
Sprinklers)......................$ 78.94 39.10
---------------------------------------------------------------- SFCA0669-003 01/01/2025

ALPINE, BUTTE, COLUSA, EL DORADO, GLENN, LASSEN, MODOC, NEVADA,

PLACER, PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA, SIERRA, SISKIYOU, SUTTER,

TEHAMA, TRINITY, YOLO AND YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
SPRINKLER FITTER.................$ 48.65 28.56
---------------------------------------------------------------- SHEE0104-006 06/29/2020

MARIN, NAPA, SOLANO SONOMA & TRINITY COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Sheet Metal Worker
Mechanical Contracts
$200,000 or less............$ 55.92 45.29
All other work..............$ 64.06 46.83
---------------------------------------------------------------- SHEE0104-009 07/01/2021

AMADOR, COLUSA, EL DORADO, NEVADA, PLACER, SACRAMENTO, SUTTER,

YOLO AND YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
SHEET METAL WORKER...............$ 47.85 41.90
---------------------------------------------------------------- SHEE0104-010 07/01/2020
AlPINE COUNTY
Rates Fringes
SHEET METAL WORKER...............$ 43.50 37.42
---------------------------------------------------------------- SHEE0104-011 07/01/2020

BUTTE, COLUSA, EL DORADO, GLENN, LASSEN, MODOC, NEVADA, PLACER,

PLUMAS, SACRAMENTO, SHASTA, SIERRA, SISKIYOU, SUTTER, TEHAMA, 7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 36/41

Page 272 of 1281 ends

YOLO AND YUBA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Sheet Metal Worker (Metal
decking and siding only).........$ 44.45 35.55
---------------------------------------------------------------- SHEE0104-014 07/01/2020

MARIN, NAPA, SOLANO, SONOMA AND TRINITY COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
SHEET METAL WORKER (Metal
Decking and Siding only).........$ 44.45 35.55
---------------------------------------------------------------- SHEE0104-019 07/01/2020

BUTTE, GLENN, LASSEN, MODOC, PLUMAS, SHASTA, SIERRA, SISKIYOU

AND TEHAMA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes

SHEET METAL WORKER
Mechanical Jobs $200,000 &
under.......................$ 35.16 35.88
Mechanical Jobs over
$200,000....................$ 46.60 40.21
---------------------------------------------------------------- * TEAM0094-001 07/01/2025
Rates Fringes
Truck drivers:

GROUP 1.....................$ 43.26 34.28
GROUP 2.....................$ 43.56 34.28
GROUP 3.....................$ 43.86 34.28
GROUP 4.....................$ 44.21 34.28
GROUP 5.....................$ 44.56 34.28
FOOTNOTES:

Articulated dump truck; Bulk cement spreader (with or without auger); Dumpcrete truck; Skid truck (debris box); Dry
pre-batch concrete mix trucks; Dumpster or similar type; Slurry truck: Use dump truck yardage rate.

Heater planer; Asphalt burner; Scarifier burner; Industrial lift truck (mechanical tailgate); Utility and clean-up
truck: Use appropriate rate for the power unit or the
equipment utilized.

TRUCK DRIVER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Dump trucks, under 6 yds.; Single unit flat rack (2- axle unit); Nipper truck (when flat rack truck is used
appropriate flat rack shall apply); Concrete pump truck (when flat rack truck is used appropriate flat rack shall apply); Concrete pump machine; Fork lift and lift jitneys; Fuel and/or grease truck driver or fuel person; Snow buggy; Steam cleaning; Bus or personhaul driver; Escort or pilot car driver; Pickup truck; Teamster oiler/greaser and/or serviceperson; Hook tender (including loading and
unloading); Team driver; Tool room attendant (refineries) GROUP 2: Dump trucks, 6 yds. and under 8 yds.; Transit
mixers, through 10 yds.; Water trucks, under 7,000 gals.; Jetting trucks, under 7,000 gals.; Single-unit flat rack (3-axle unit); Highbed heavy duty transport; Scissor truck; Rubber-tired muck car (not self-loaded); Rubber-tired truck jumbo; Winch truck and ""A"" frame drivers; Combination winch 7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 37/41

Page 273 of 1281 ends

truck with hoist; Road oil truck or bootperson;
Buggymobile; Ross, Hyster and similar straddle carriers; Small rubber-tired tractor
GROUP 3: Dump trucks, 8 yds. and including 24 yds.; Transit mixers, over 10 yds.; Water trucks, 7,000 gals. and over; Jetting trucks, 7,000 gals. and over; Vacuum trucks under 7500 gals. Trucks towing tilt bed or flat bed pull
trailers; Lowbed heavy duty transport; Heavy duty transport tiller person; Self- propelled street sweeper with
self-contained refuse bin; Boom truck - hydro-lift or
Swedish type extension or retracting crane; P.B. or similar type self-loading truck; Tire repairperson; Combination bootperson and road oiler; Dry distribution truck (A
bootperson when employed on such equipment, shall receive the rate specified for the classification of road oil
trucks or bootperson); Ammonia nitrate distributor, driver and mixer; Snow Go and/or plow
GROUP 4: Dump trucks, over 25 yds. and under 65 yds.; Water pulls - DW 10's, 20's, 21's and other similar equipment when pulling Aqua/pak or water tank trailers; Helicopter pilots (when transporting men and materials); Lowbedk Heavy Duty Transport up to including 7 axles; DW10's, 20's, 21's and other similar Cat type, Terra Cobra, LeTourneau Pulls, Tournorocker, Euclid and similar type equipment when
pulling fuel and/or grease tank trailers or other
miscellaneous trailers; Vacuum Trucks 7500 gals and over and truck repairman
GROUP 5: Dump trucks, 65 yds. and over; Holland hauler; Low bed Heavy Duty Transport over 7 axles
---------------------------------------------------------------- WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing
operation to which welding is incidental.
================================================================ Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/government-contracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (iii)).
---------------------------------------------------------------- The body of each wage determination lists the classifications and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the type(s) of construction and geographic area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order under rate identifiers indicating whether the particular 7/15/25, 3:23PMSAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/938/41

Page 274 of 1281 ends

rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate), a survey rate, a weighted union average rate, a state adopted rate, or a supplemental classification rate.

Union Rate Identifiers
A four-letter identifier beginning with characters other than ""SU"", ""UAVG"", ?SA?, or ?SC? denotes that a union rate was prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2024. PLUM is an identifier of the union whose collectively bargained rate prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. The date, 07/01/2024 in the example, is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all changes over time that are reported to WHD in the rates
in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing the classification.

Union Average Rate Identifiers
The UAVG identifier indicates that no single rate prevailed for those classifications, but that 100% of the data reported for the classifications reflected union rates. EXAMPLE:

UAVG-OH-0010 01/01/2024. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the State of Ohio.

The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. The date, 01/01/2024 in the example, indicates the date the wage determination was updated to reflect the most current union average rate.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January, to reflect a weighted average of the current rates in the
collective bargaining agreements on which the rate is based.

Survey Rate Identifiers
The ""SU"" identifier indicates that either a single non-union rate prevailed (as defined in 29 CFR 1.2) for this
classification in the survey or that the rate was derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As a weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SUFL2022-007 6/27/2024. SU indicates the rate is a single non-union
prevailing rate or a weighted average of survey data for that classification. FL indicates the State of Florida. 2022 is the year of the survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. The date, 6/27/2024 in the example, indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier. ?SU? wage rates typically remain in effect until a new survey is conducted. However, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) has the discretion to update such rates under 29 CFR 1.6(c)(1).

State Adopted Rate Identifiers
The ""SA"" identifier indicates that the classifications and prevailing wage rates set by a state (or local) government were adopted under 29 C.F.R 1.3(g)-(h). Example: SAME2023-007 01/03/2024. SA reflects that the rates are state adopted. ME refers to the State of Maine. 2023 is the year during which the state completed the survey on which the listed classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 7/15/25, 3:23PMSAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/939/41

Page 275 of 1281 ends

The date, 01/03/2024 in the example, reflects the date on which the classifications and rates under the ?SA? identifier took effect under state law in the state from which the rates were adopted.
-----------------------------------------------------------

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS
1) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:
a) a survey underlying a wage determination
b) an existing published wage determination
c) an initial WHD letter setting forth a position on
a wage determination matter
d) an initial conformance (additional classification
and rate) determination
On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be directed to the WHD Branch of Wage Surveys. Requests can be submitted via email to [email protected] or by mail to:

Branch of Wage Surveys
Wage and Hour Division
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210
Regarding any other wage determination matter such as
conformance decisions, requests for initial decisions should be directed to the WHD Branch of Construction Wage Determinations.

Requests can be submitted via email to [email protected] or by mail to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations
Wage and Hour Division
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210
2) If an initial decision has been issued, then any interested party (those affected by the action) that disagrees with the decision can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7).

Requests for review and reconsideration can be submitted via email to [email protected] or by mail to:

Wage and Hour Administrator
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210
The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.
3) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210.
================================================================ 7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 40/41

Page 276 of 1281 ends

END OF GENERAL DECISION"

7/15/25, 3:23 PM SAM.gov
https://sam.gov/wage-determination/CA20250007/9 41/41

Page 277 of 1281 ends

Page 278 of 1281 ends

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 T CA FO L NR OF TA E SON NG E EN AL R I A E ROFES E ST RED P G No.Exp. S RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA CIVIL CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA 06/25/2025 GENERAL NOTES 2021 GENERAL FUND ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 142G-1 STANDARD GENERAL NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE MADE TO APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE CONTRACTOR FURTHER AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD OWNER AND ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXEMPTING LIABILITY ARISING FORM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF ENGINEER. THE DIGOUTS SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH OF 4 INCHES. IF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL OF EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL. IF THE ENGINEER DOES NOT APPROVE THAT THE MATERIAL IS UNSUITABLE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL. EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY SHORED, BRACED AND SHEETED SO THAT THE EARTH WILL NOT SLIDE OR SETTLE AND SO THAT ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OF ANY KIND WILL BE FULLY PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM A LACK OF ADEQUATE SHORING, BRACING AND SHEETING, SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND HE SHALL EFFECT NECESSARY REPAIRS OR RECONSTRUCTION AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHEETING, SHORING, AND BRACING OR EQUIVALENT METHOD, FOR THE PROTECTION OF LIFE OR LIMB, WHICH SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS OF THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALWAYS COMPLY WITH OSHA REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WITH A COPY OF THE OSHA PERMIT. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES. REFER TO THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR PERMITS NEEDED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LIGHTS, SIGNS, BARRICADES, FLAGGERS OR OTHER DEVICES NECESSARY TO PROVIDE FOR SAFETY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POST EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR POLICE, FIRE, AMBULANCE, AND THOSE AGENCIES RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE JOB SITE. STATIONING HEREON IS ALONG STREET CENTERLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR INDICATED. ALL STATIONING IS APPROXIMATE. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS THAT BECOME DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETELY RESTORED TO THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE CURRENT STANDARDS AND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER, AT THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPENSE. IF ARCHEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE UNCOVERED DURING GRADING, TRENCHING OR OTHER EXCAVATION, EARTHWORK WITHIN 100 FEET OF THESE MATERIALS SHALL BE STOPPED UNTIL A PROFESSIONAL ARCHEOLOGIST WHO IS CERTIFIED BY THE SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ARCHEOLOGY (SCA) AND/OR THE SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL ARCHEOLOGY (SOPA) HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO EVALUATE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FIND AND SUGGEST APPROPRIATE MITIGATION MEASURES, IF THEY ARE DEEMED NECESSARY. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 21-2E OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, THE ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SHALL BE CONTACTED IMMEDIATELY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET AND FOLLOW THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S (EPA) NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) REQUIREMENTS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. SHOULD IT APPEAR THAT THE WORK TO BE DONE OR ANY MATTER RELATIVE THERETO IS NOT SUFFICIENTLY DETAILED OR EXPLAINED ON THESE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING FROM THE ENGINEER SUCH FURTHER EXPLANATIONS AS MAY BE NECESSARY. STRIPING NOTES: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL PAVEMENT DELINEATION ON THE SAME ALIGNMENT. BEFORE OBLITERATING ANY PAVEMENT DELINEATION, THE LOCATION OF THE PAVEMENT DELINIATION SHALL BE REFERENCED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF CONTROL POINTS TO REESTABLISH THE ALIGNMENT. THE REFERENCES SHALL ALSO INCLUDE THE LIMITS OR CHANGES IN STRIPING PATTERN, INCLUDING ONE- AND TWO-WAY BARRIER LINES, LIMIT LINES, CROSSWALKS AND OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL EXISTING NON-CONFORMING STRIPING (BY GRINDING) AND PAVEMENT MARKERS AND ALL EXISTING STRIPING THAT CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED STRIPING. ALL RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND THE LATEST EDITION, WITH REVISIONS, OF THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. ALL TRAFFIC STRIPES, ARROWS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL TO THE SPECIFICATIONS SET FORTH IN SECTION 84 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (LATEST EDITION). THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED ONLY WHEN THE PAVEMENT SURFACE TEMPERATURE IS ABOVE 60 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING ALL CONSTRUCTION SIGNING AS REQUIRED BY THE CALTRANS TRAFFIC MANUAL TO DELINEATE CONSTRUCTION HAZARDS AT HIS EXPENSE. LANE LINES MUST ALIGN THROUGH INTERSECTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BIKE LOOP LEGENDS WHERE EXISTING AND NEW BIKE LANE LOOPS ARE INSTALLED. CITY OF ROSEVILLE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIREMENTS GENERAL NOTES: ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THESE PLANS, THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS, MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THE 2015 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND AMENDMENTS TO THE 2015 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE SIGNED PLANS IN POSSESSION PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE IS A MEMBER OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) ONE-CALL PROGRAM. THE CONTRACTOR OR ANY SUBCONTRACTOR FOR THIS CONTRACT SHALL NOTIFY MEMBERS OF U.S.A. 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PERFORMING EXCAVATION WORK BY CALLING TOLL-FREE NUMBER: (800) 642-2444. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK ALL AREAS TO BE EXCAVATED PRIOR TO CONTACTING U.S.A. ANY AREAS NOT MARKED WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO U.S.A. AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM EXCAVATION. THE TYPES, LOCATIONS AND/OR DEPTHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE IMPROVEMENT PLANS WERE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VARYING RELIABILITY. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLY ACTUAL EXCAVATION WILL REVEAL THE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS, AND DEPTHS OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. A REASONABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO LOCATE AND DELINEATE ALL KNOWN UTILITIES. HOWEVER, THE ENGINEER CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE DELINEATION OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED BUT WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE AND VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW IMPROVEMENTS, CONNECTING TO EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING MONUMENTS, OTHER SURVEY MARKERS, STREET SIGNS AND OTHER IMPORTANT OBJECTS ON THE JOB SITE. A.C. SURFACE SHALL BE CUT TO A NEAT, STRAIGHT LINE PARALLEL WITH OR PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREET CENTERLINE AND THE EXPOSED EDGE SHALL BE TACKED WITH EMULSION PRIOR TO PAVING. THE EXPOSED BASE MATERIAL SHALL BE GRADED, RECOMPACTED, AND RESEALED PRIOR TO PAVING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN WHICH SHALL BE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION BEFORE START OF WORK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION, WITH REVISIONS, OF THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. IF, AS PART OF TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES, A ROADWAY CLOSURE HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION INSPECTOR 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF SETTING UP THE CLOSURE. ALL EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE SAW CUT TO A NEAT, STRAIGHT LINE AND SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE ADJACENT JOINTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL PEDESTRIANS, VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, EXISTING LANDSCAPE, AND SURVEY MARKERS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. UTILITIES LOCATIONS ARE TAKEN FROM CITY AS-BUILT DRAWINGS AND FIELD REVIEWS. LOCATIONS OF THE GROUND FEATURES (MH, VALVES, ETC.) ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT IN PLACE ALL DETECTOR HANDHOLES WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. DETECTOR HANDHOLES DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. LEGEND: PEW STRIPING LEGEND: BUS ONLY T LL XW SDSW ## DETAIL 38 MOD 4' 6' 4' 6' 4' 8" 6' 4'
(VARIES)
8"
8"
8"
8" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC "BIKE LANE GREEN" THERMOPLASTIC DETAIL 38A MOD 8" DETAIL 39A MOD
6"8' 4'
6" "BIKE LANE GREEN" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE THERMOPLASTIC 4' 6' 4' 4' 8' (VARIES) 6'

Page 279 of 1281 ends

dzW/>hZZDW NO CHIP SEAL AREA2' 4' EXTENT OF CHIP SEAL CHIP SEAL AREA dzW/>hd/>/dz NO CHIP SEAL AREA UTILITY COVER EXTENT OF CHIP SEAL EXTENT OF CHIP SEAL R1'-3" G5 BOXES & MONUMENTS UTILITY LID UTILITY LID R3' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 T CA FO L NR OF TA E SON NG E EN AL R I A E ROFES E ST RED P G No.Exp. S RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA CIVIL CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA 06/25/2025 GENERAL DETAILS 2021 GENERAL FUND ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 143G-2

Page 280 of 1281 ends

39 39A 21 21 39 39 38 38 38 38 38 31 9
9 9
9 26 T3D 26 XW XW 39A XW XW x 200' x 197' T3D DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL JUNCTION BLVD FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 14 4 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG JB-1 RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS STRIPING LAYOUT MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-2 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-2

Page 281 of 1281 ends

39A 39 39A 39 39A 21 21 39 39 38 38 38 31 9
9 9
9 9
9 XW XW XW
XW LL 38 LL 39A 39 XW x 200' x 200' x 200' x 200' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL JUNCTION BLVD FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 14 5 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG JB-2 RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS STRIPING LAYOUT MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-3
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-1
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-3
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-1

Page 282 of 1281 ends

39 39 39 39A 39A 39A 39A 21 21 21
23 21 39 39 39 38 38 38 31 31
9 9
9 9 38
9 XW XW
XW LL LL 9
9 39
9 XW 21 38 x 200' x 140' 39A
x 161' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL JUNCTION BLVD FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 14 6 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG JB-3 STRIPING LAYOUT RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-4
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-2
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-4
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-2

Page 283 of 1281 ends

38 39 39 38 21 39 38 38 31
9 9
9 9 31 37B XW
XW LL
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-3 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL JUNCTION BLVD FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 14 7 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG JB-4 RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS STRIPING LAYOUT MATCHLINE SEE SHEET JB-3

Page 284 of 1281 ends

38 39 38 38 38 39 39A 38 MOD XWLL LL 38 38 38 38 40 XW
9 9 XWXW 26 26
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-2 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-2 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL FAIRWAY DR FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 14 8 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG FW-1 RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS STRIPING LAYOUT

Page 285 of 1281 ends

39 39 39 38 38 39 39A 39A 38 MOD XW XWXW LL LL 38 38 40 XW
9 38
9 9 38
26 26 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL FAIRWAY DR FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 14 9 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG FW-2 STRIPING LAYOUT MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-3 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-3
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-1MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-1 RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS

Page 286 of 1281 ends

QTYPE
QTYPE
38 39 39 38 39 39 38 39A
39A 39A 38 MOD LL LL LL LL 38 38 38 38
9 9
9 9
38 9
QTYPE
QTYPE
26 26 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL FAIRWAY DR FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 1410 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG FW-3 RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS STRIPING LAYOUT N
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-4 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-4
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-2MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-2

Page 287 of 1281 ends

Q
TYPE 39 38 MOD
38 39
38 38 MOD 39 38 MOD XW XW XW XWLL LL 38 38
38 27B 40 31
9 9
9 9 38 38 21 21
Q
TYPE 38
26 26
22' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL JUNCTION BLVD FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 1411 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG FW-4 RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS STRIPING LAYOUT DETAIL 38 MOD 8" 4' 8' 4' 8' 4'
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-5 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-5
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-3MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-3

Page 288 of 1281 ends

39 39 38 38 38 38 39 39 XW XW XW LL LL 38 38 40 31
9 9
9 9
26 26 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL FAIRWAY DR FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 1412 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG FW-5 RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS STRIPING LAYOUT DETAIL 38 MOD 8" 4' 8' 4' 8' 4'
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-6 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-6
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-4 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-4

Page 289 of 1281 ends

Q
TYPE
Q
TYPE
Q
TYPE
Q
TYPE 38 38 MOD 38 39 38 38 MOD 38 MOD XW XWXW XW XW LL LL LL LL 38 38 38 40 XW 40 9 39
9 XW
Q
TYPE
Q
TYPE
Q
TYPE
Q
TYPE 38
26 26 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL FAIRWAY DR FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 1413 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG FW-6 RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS STRIPING LAYOUT MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-7
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-5MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-5
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-7

Page 290 of 1281 ends

T3D 39 38 39 38 38 38 39 39A 38 MOD XW LL 38 38 38 T3D 26 26 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 311 VERNON STREET CITY OF ROSEVILLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CALIFORNIA T CA
FO
L
NR
OF
TA E
SON
NG E
EN
AL
R
I A
E

ROFES ETS RED
P
G No.Exp.

S
RE 09-30-25 87197 N. SIVIGLIA 06/25/2025 CIVIL FAIRWAY DR FAIRWAY DRIVE AND JUNCTION BOULEVARD ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT 1414 B:\PUBLIC WORKS\CIP\1_CURRENT PROJECTS\FAIRWAY AND JUNCTION ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT\06 - DESIGN\DWG\FAIRWAY - JUNCTION_2025-06-04 - CALTRANS SET UPDATED.DWG FW-7 RESURFACING AND DIGOUT LIMITS STRIPING LAYOUT MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-6 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET FW-6

Page 291 of 1281 ends

Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Fairway - Junction Arterial Resurfacing Project Project Location(s): Fairway Drive between Blue Oaks Boulevard and Stanford Ranch Road and Junction Boulevard between Foothills Boulevard and Washington Boulevard, Roseville, California.

Project Description: The project involves preventative maintenance activities along segments of Fairway Drive and Junction Boulevard. Activities would include patching and sealing and may include the removal and replacement of failed asphalt roadway sections, if needed. The project would not result in an expansion of capacity or use and is not located near any sensitive environmental resources.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Public Works Department Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 1 Exemption as described in Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 1 consists of …. .minor alteration of existing public facilities, ….involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing…. examples include highways, streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails….”
The project is confined to existing streets within City right-of-way and would not result in expansion of use. No environmentally sensitive resources are located within the project site; therefore the Class 1 exemption is applicable to the proposed project.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Nicolas Bumb, Public Works Department, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 746-1313.

Signature: Date: 5/27/2025
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator, City of
Roseville

Page 292 of 1281 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 8/20/2025
Item #: VII.4
File #: 0709-03 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2025-511
Title: Sun Rose Permanent Supportive Housing - Budget Adjustment Contact: Emily Sawin, Trisha Isom 916-774-5388, 916-746-1239 [email protected], [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment to carry forward $343,714.11 in unspent funding from FY2024-25 that is available in the HOME Program Income fund to support the remaining loan amount for the Sun Rose Apartments project. No General Fund resources will be used for this project.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving a budget adjustment to carry forward appropriated, but unspent, HOME Program Income funds in the amount of $343,714.11 to fund the remaining loan amount on the Sun Rose Apartments project.

BACKGROUND
On February 5, 2025, City Council approved a $1.5 million loan, along with the associated loan documents and Regulatory Agreement, to Advocates for Mentally Ill, Housing (AMIH) to support the Sun Rose Apartments permanent supportive housing project. This funding assists in the rehabilitation of a State Homekey project, which includes 82 studio units and one manager’s unit designated for individuals and families experiencing homelessness. In addition to the loan, the Roseville Housing Authority committed eight (8) Projected Based Vouchers (PBVs) to the project, which supports its long-term affordability. Of the PBVs, four vouchers are allocated to households earning 30% AMI, while the remaining four are designated for Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) voucher holders.

The timeline for the rehabilitation project was extended due to delays in coordination with the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), which postponed full expenditure of the $1.5 million HOME Program Income loan budgeted for FY2024-25. Staff is requesting approval of a budget adjustment to carry forward appropriated, but unspent, HOME Program Income funds in the amount of $343,714.11 for the remaining loan amount on the Sun Rose Apartments project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City's HOME Program Income is generated by First-Time Home Buyer and Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation loan payoffs that are funded using HOME dollars. No additional HOME Program Income funds are being requested and no General Fund resources will be used for the budget adjustment for the Sun Rose Apartments project.

Page 293 of 1281 ends

Approval of the budget adjustment for the Sun Rose Apartments meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Emily Sawin, Administrative Technician
Trisha Isom, Housing Manager
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 6980
REVIEWERS:

Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Created/Initiated - 7/29/2025 Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Approved - 7/29/2025 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 7/29/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/30/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 8/4/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/7/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/7/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/8/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 8/11/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/11/2025

Page 294 of 1281 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 6980

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Sun Rose Apartments State HomeKey affordable housing project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

Page 295 of 1281 ends

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 07/03/2025
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCAL YEAR:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
2210 5573 54101 343,715 Increase Grant Deferred Loans for the Sun Rose Apartments State HomeKey affordable housing project
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 343,715

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 343,715

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
2210 3601 00000 000000 (343,715) Decrease HOME Inv Partnership Program Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (343,715)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Economic Development Department is requesting a budget adjustment of $343,715 to increase the HOME Inv Partnership Grants Deferred Loans budget to fund the remaining loan amount on the Sun Rose Apartments State HomeKey affordable housing project.

In February 2025, City Council approved a $1.5 million loan using HOME Program Income to support the project. An initial payment of $1,156,285.89 was executed in April 2025, leaving the remaining $343,715 due this fiscal year (FY2025-26), upon California Department of Housing and Community Development approval. This amount was not requested during the development of the FY2025-26 budget.

Adequate resources are available in the HOME Inv Partnership Program Fund.

Emily Sawin, Management Analyst 2025-26
Emily Sawin, Management Analyst
Economic Development/Housing

Page 296 of 1281 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 8/20/2025
Item #: VII.5
File #: 0214 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2025-538
Title: Engage, Empower, and Implement Grant - New Non-Capital Improvement Project Approval, Subrecipient Agreement, and Budget Adjustment Contact: Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a new Non-Capital Improvement Project – Roseville Invest Health Data Challenge Engage, Empower, Implement Collaboration and a Subrecipient Agreement with the Health Education Council to implement the Sacramento Area Council of Governments Engage, Empower, Implement Grant. Staff also recommends approval of a budget adjustment appropriating $180,000 in the Grants Fund with corresponding grant revenue in the Project.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve the establishment of the Roseville Invest Health Data Challenge Engage, Empower, Implement Collaboration new non-capital improvement project;

2. Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Subrecipient Agreement with the Health Education Council for the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Engage, Empower, Implement Grant; and

3. Adopt an ordinance approving a budget adjustment appropriating $180,000 in the Grants Fund to the Project.

BACKGROUND
In 2016, the City partnered with the Health Education Council (HEC) to secure funding that would support initiatives that improve health in low-income neighborhoods. To date, the partnership (recognized as the Roseville Invest Health initiative) has attracted over $11 million in investments and continues to be awarded grant funding to further the work.

More recently, in 2024, Roseville Invest Health was awarded a City Health Dashboard Data Challenge grant to examine a broad dataset related to the social determinants of health including economic stability and education access. Subsequently, the Roseville Invest Health Data Challenge aimed to identify additional funding to interpret and develop solutions to address the findings from the Data Challenge.

In September 2024, Roseville Invest Health applied for a grant from the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Engage, Empower, Implement (EEI) program to continue the Roseville Invest Health and Data Challenge work. The goal of the EEI grant is to support community-based planning and activities in the six-county region with a specific focus on meaningful community engagement in disinvested communities and provide local governments with an opportunity to develop stronger relations

Page 297 of 1281 ends

with community-based organizations. In early 2025, Roseville Invest Health was selected as one of the Sacramento regional partnerships to receive $180,000 in EEI grant program funds to continue work under the Data Challenge.

Through the Roseville Invest Health Data Challenge EEI Collaboration project, residents from historically disadvantaged communities will engage with HEC/Roseville Invest Health to develop resident-driven solutions that guide the City, local businesses, and educational leaders in restructuring and implementing programs to expand access to employment opportunities. The initiative aims to address key barriers faced by underemployed, low-income individuals, including limited access to affordable housing, transportation and job training. The project will also evaluate workforce challenges and explore strategies across highopportunity sectors (e.g., transportation-related careers, green jobs, etc.), while identifying barriers to workforce participation.

Working as the Community Based Organization (CBO) and program lead, HEC will oversee and implement a robust community engagement workplan from August 2025 through spring 2027. The workplan is outlined in the Subrecipient Agreement. The City’s Economic Development Department will oversee the workplan and distribution of the grant funds. A budget adjustment is also requested to show reservation of grant funds for the Roseville Invest Health Data Challenge EEI Collaboration project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The SACOG Engage, Empower, Implement (EEI) program is funded by the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (grant funds). The City was awarded $180,000 in grant funds to cover the full costs of the Roseville Invest Health Data Challenge EEI Collaboration project, including reimbursement of staff time (estimated at $10,400) and CBO implementation costs (estimated at $169,600). The recommended budget adjustment will appropriate $180,000 in the Grants Fund with corresponding grant revenue in the Project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15061(c)(3) and §15378. The approval of a subrecipient agreement and budget adjustment meets the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

3. Enhance economic vitality

5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Gina McColl, Economic Development Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:

Page 298 of 1281 ends

1. Resolution 25-276

2. Subrecipient Agreement

3. Ordinance 6981
REVIEWERS:

Gina McColl, Economic Development Department Created/Initiated - 7/29/2025 Cary Camilleri, Economic Development Department Approved - 7/29/2025 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 7/29/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/5/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 8/5/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/7/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/7/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/8/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 8/11/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/11/2025

Page 299 of 1281 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-276

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

THE HEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, the Subrecipient Agreement for the Sacramento Area Council of Governments’ Engage, Empower, Implement Grant, by and between the City of Roseville and the Health Education Council, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 300 of 1281 ends

Page 301 of 1281 ends

Page 302 of 1281 ends

Page 303 of 1281 ends

Page 304 of 1281 ends

Page 305 of 1281 ends

Page 306 of 1281 ends

Page 307 of 1281 ends

Page 308 of 1281 ends

Page 309 of 1281 ends

Page 310 of 1281 ends

Page 311 of 1281 ends

Page 312 of 1281 ends

Page 313 of 1281 ends

Page 314 of 1281 ends

Page 315 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
Scope of Work
Organization Name Lead Staff Task/Role/Responsibility
City of Roseville Gina McColl, Melissa
Anguiano, Megan
Scheid
Project leads working with HEC to support
EEI Collaboration and engagement in the
core neighborhoods. Facilitate HEC/
resident presentations to City Council and
other groups.

Health Education Council (HEC) Debra Oto-Kent,
Roxana Garcia-Ochoa
Project leads working with the City of
Roseville staff to support the
implementation of project deliverables
and supervision of HEC staff/consultants
who will lead resident engagement efforts
in the core neighborhoods.

Latino Leadership Council (LLC) Elisa Herrera, Celina
Salas
LLC will work with HEC staff to help inform
the assessment documents; recruit
participants, provide feedback on project
design and analysis; lead engagement
sessions with residents.

Local Neighborhood Groups
Including but not limited to:

Roseville Coalition of
Neighborhood Associations
(Roseville Heights & Los Cerritos
Neighborhoods), Roseville
Police Activities League, Boys
and Girls Club and the First
United Methodist Church in
Roseville.

Steve Parker, Will
Rodgers, Lori Ennis,
Jamie Hazen, Randy
Tooker, Pastor Angel
Rivero
HEC will work with identified
neighborhood mini grant awardees to
support the recruitment of individuals and
families living or working in the
neighborhoods to participate in project
design and feedback through listening
sessions, surveys and/or interviews.

Local Community Organizer Alma Caravarin Ms. Caravarin will work with HEC staff to help inform the assessment documents;
recruit participants working with the
neighborhood association, local faith
groups, businesses and others, provide
feedback on project design and analysis;
lead engagement sessions with residents.

University of California, Davis Miriam Nuno, PhD Evaluation consultant, Miriam Nuno will conduct all data analysis.

Page 316 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
The City of Roseville and the Health Education Council (HEC) have worked together for several years through the Invest Health Roseville (IHR) initiative since its inception in 2016. HEC will leverage data collected in recent years from residents living in the downtown core neighborhoods and the findings of a recent Invest Health Roseville project that is with the City Health Dashboard. This project is an initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to help cities identify neighborhood-level health disparities to support opportunities to improve community health and well-being. The dashboard has provided the City of Roseville and community partners with a granular overview of datapoints for the city, with an emphasis on the downtown core neighborhoods by integrating data from a variety of local and national data sources providing metrics that highlight the social determinants of health, employment and housing data. Through this project, the City of Roseville and HEC staff will actively engage residents in identifying, interpreting and developing resident-driven solutions to help the city, local business and education leaders restructure and implement programming that will help improve access to employment opportunities and further address barriers for low-income individuals who are underemployed, face challenges with access to affordable housing and job training opportunities.

The project outcomes will focus engaging residents to influence policies that will improve Roseville’s quality of life and job and workforce development opportunities.

Task 1. Pre-Engagement
• Task 1a. Prepare meetings with project staff, local consultants and key stakeholders to examine target data and discuss project outcomes.
• Task 1b. Identify strategy for pre-liminary resident engagement which includes community listening sessions and key-informant interviews.
• Task 1c. Finalize subcontracts; work with Invest Health partners and subcontractors to review city-level and core neighborhood data on unemployment and affordable housing to inform outreach plan and engagement opportunities; develop and finalize mini grant guidelines.

At the start of the grant period, the City of Roseville will contract with HEC to initiate project planning efforts. HEC will regularly convene partners from the city’s economic development team, housing department, city manager’s office, Sierra College, the Placer County Business Alliance, Placer County Workforce Development and Golden Sierra Job Training Agency to further examine the city’s employment and housing data on geographic or neighborhood differences within the city. Partners will strategize a resident engagement plan to leverage the expertise of residents living in the target neighborhoods bordering the Union Pacific Railyard in downtown Roseville and low-income residents who are eligible for affordable housing support. The engagement plan will be crafted and implemented with a resident-centered approach upholding the strategic goals outlined in the City’s Envision Roseville Economic Development Plan. Residents who are engaged in the Invest Health Roseville initiative will support the planning process to review preliminary data and provide a realistic overview of community needs that will inform engagement process and evaluation metrics including survey and open-ended questions for the data identification process.

Page 317 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
Task 2. Engagement Plan
The City of Roseville will work with HEC to implement its resident engagement strategy in phases between March 2025 and June 2026.

HEC will engage residents through the Invest Health network to accomplish the following phases:

1. Data Identification (August 2025- December 2025): Through community events, focus groups and key informant interviews, residents will help identify the types of questions that should be answered to understand unemployment, underemployment, or other aspects of employment in the neighborhoods.

Residents will also provide insight on how job opportunities can pave the way for safe, quality and affordable housing. If data sets do not exist to answer these questions, the project will work with resident leaders to survey their neighbors to collect the data. Data collection tools will be developed by project leads with input from local evaluation consultant to assess the effectiveness of the measurement tools. These tools include focus group guides, interview questions and resident survey questions.

2. Data Interpretation (September 2025-February 2026): Once data has been identified, the project will host community workshops to share the data in easy-to-understand formats so that residents can learn about and provide interpretation of the factors influencing unemployment in their area of the city. Resident sample will also review the measurement tools used to.

3. Solution Generation (March 2026 - August 2026): Through community events, focus groups/listening sessions and key informant interviews, residents will develop provide feedback to city, business and education leaders on how they can shape existing strategies and/or create new ones to address the factors described by the data and community engagement process.

The City of Roseville will work with HEC staff to administer subcontracts with additional community organizations and partners who will support the resident engagement phases working with community members. This includes working with the downtown neighborhood associations to increase resident voice capacity and diversify engagement among neighborhood groups, leveraging expertise from community organizers who live in the neighborhood and support from the Latino Leadership Council’s promotora/community health worker network. Funds will be allocated to support engagement materials including printing, meeting space rental, translation support and food. Residents who participate in the project’s outreach will be compensated with a gift card ranging from $25-50 to nearby neighborhood retailers including Grocery Outlet, Trader Joes, Walmart or Target. HEC will reach at least 200-300 residents with community outreach and engagement. • Task 2a. Establish engagement goals for project
o Center the voices of the community residents.
o Build upon existing relationships and increase trust within the target neighborhoods. o Establish norms to highlight resident-driven strategies for outreach and communitydecision making. • Task 2b. Audience identification

Page 318 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
o Identify events, engagement opportunities and solidify outreach plan. • Task 2c. Engagement activities
o Create a strategy and process to bring input and feedback from communitymembers o Codevelop the themes and discussion topics
o Create a timeline for obtaining input and decision-making points o Identify methodology for engagement
o Identify measurement tools and materials for community engagement • Task 2d. Manage financial arrangements with participating organizations/individuals o Execute and manage subcontracts with local organization and community groups • Task 2e. Meeting facilitation and collaboration
o Facilitate meetings with CBOs, partners, and trusted messengers o Support meeting coordination including agenda development, facilitate meetings, provide meeting summaries, attendee lists, and key actions/recommendations • Task 2f. Solidify Project Timeline
Task 3. Execution of Plan
HEC will lead engagement efforts with residents through various approaches including resident listening sessions, interviews and feedback surveys to inform the City’s Economic Development Strategy. HEC will utilize opportunities to interact with residents in existing groups and trusted meeting spaces. HEC and trusted messengers will also conduct in-depth neighborhood level outreach to solicit input from a diverse pool of residents and age groups representing the community's demographic makeup. Project will also engage with the local high schools in the neighborhood to engage transitional aged youth who are exploring career pathways and local job exploration. This engagement is critical to support the advancement of new programs that are launching through partnerships with Sierra College and local workforce networks to create career training pipeline opportunities that align with local workforce needs including manufacturing, health and technology, among others.

HEC will activate a network of residents, local leaders and community partners through the Invest Health network. HEC staff members and local consultants have established trust and experience with interacting with residents in target settings. HEC and project partners will engage residents who live or work in the downtown core neighborhoods of Roseville across the three phases of engagement. This network is comprised of local leaders, organizations, businesses, government and other stakeholders who serve as trusted messengers in the community. Engagement will occur in a variety of languages as appropriate including English, Spanish, Russian and Farsi/Dari. Participating residents will be compensated for their time through a gift card stipend ranging between $10-$50 depending on the level of engagement in the project. Outreach will occur in target neighborhoods, at schools, at businesses and with residents who live within the city’s affordable housing communities.

Resident will be recruited through existing relationships with local groups or networks including but not limited to:
• Local neighborhood associations: Roseville Heights, Los Cerritos, Cherry Glen/ TheilesManor

Page 319 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
• Parents of children who attend school or after school programming in target neighborhoods including Roseville Boys and Girls Club, Roseville Police Activities League, Woodbridge Elementary School, Cirby Elementary School, Kaseberg Elementary School, Roseville High School, Oakmont High School, Spanger Middle School
• Residents who attend local food distributions or food closets in target neighborhoods led by the Placer Food Bank, St. Vincent de Paul, The Rock of Roseville and First United Methodist Church of Roseville
• Participants who attend programming at the Roseville First United Methodist church led by community partners including Health Education Council, Latino Leadership Council, Child Advocates of Placer County, Placer People of Faith Together and local Community Health Worker/ promotoras.
• Engage participants from the Gathering Inn, located in the downtown core neighborhoods. • Engagement with residents living at affordable housing communities within the City of Roseville, including senior and multi-family apartmentsites.
• Local business owners include Roundhouse Deli, Denio’s Farmer’s Market, Roseville Market, Main Street Grocery, Ola’s Market.
• Task 3a. Implement resident engagement activities outlined in Task 2. • Task 3b. Train facilitators in appropriate languages. • Task 3c. Schedule key informant interviews; focus groups; listening sessions and related activities.
• Task 3d. Recruit participants with methods described in Task 2, influencer networks, existing relationships with CBO’s, neighborhood associations, schools, etc. • Task 3e. Conduct engagement activities, collect data, work with consultant to analyze results. • Task 3f. Review draft analysis and share with residents through existing resident advisory committee and /or by recruiting residents to offer feedback on findings to integratecomments.

Task 4. Evaluation
HEC staff and trusted messengers will carry out community engagement efforts for this project utilizing shared measurement tools that effectively capture resident voice. The evaluation period will occur between September 2026-December 2026. Participant survey and listening session/interview data will be handled properly following HIPAA guidelines and data will be entered into a JotForm, a HIPPA compliant database by trained HEC staff and trusted messengers. Informal outreach engagement will also occur through in-depth 1-1 discussions, and data will be captured appropriately. HEC staff and contracted local evaluation consultant will analyze project data and create a summary report of the outreach methods and findings.

HEC will work with trusted messengers to recruit a subset of residents who participate in engagement efforts. Residents will be asked to share additional input on their participation in the workshop/listening sessions/surveys/interviews and identify increased levels of trust and engagement with the strategic plan process. This information will also be included in the final report highlighting key themes and findings.

Page 320 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
Task 4a. Pre and post surveys or listening sessions measuring the effectiveness of the engagement:
o Feeling heard & included, as compared to before the engagement o Feeling more connected to the planning process, as compared to before the engagement
o Trust increased/decreased as a result of the engagement process o The final product reflects the needs of the community Task 4b. Participant counts (if possible, compared to previous efforts in the area) Task 4c. Narrative documentation
Task 5. Final Deliverables
Data and resident input shared during the project engagement period will be summarized into a report that will outline findings that will shed light on economic opportunity and barriers related to housing and employment access. The report will provide metrics, feedback and future opportunities to carry out the City’s ‘Envision Roseville’ Economic Development strategic focus goals.

HEC will also create a summarized slide deck of the data to support presentation to the Roseville City Council and/or Placer County Board of supervisors meeting to share findings. HEC’s project leads will also share the synthesized report findings with the project workforce steering committee and develop a synthesized report and plan of action in alignment with the city’s economic development strategic plan.

HEC and the City team will also present their findings to the Placer County Business Alliance and other key leadership groups by March 2027.

HEC will also share final reports and recommendations with residents who participate in engagement efforts. The final deliverables will be accomplished by the end of the project period by HEC, trusted messengers and local consultants will be shared with the City of Roseville as the fiscal agent for overall project reporting.
• Task 5a. Project closeout report
• Task 5b. Evaluation Summary and lesson learned
• Task 5c. Engagement outcomes and opportunitiesreport
• Task 5d. Present Findings to Roseville City Council, Sierra College the chambers, business alliance and other workforce development groups.
• Task 5e. Document next steps and obtain City Council and other stakeholdersupport.

Task 6. Budget
Task #: Description/Title Hours needed to
complete
Hourly Rate Materials/Other
Costs
Total Cost
for Task
Task 1: Pre-Engagement Task 1
Total:
$72,950

Page 321 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
Task 1a. Meeting prep,
data review, survey
development
50 20 hours/ $200
per hour=
$4,000
30 hours/ $150
per hour=
$4,500
$8,500
Task 1b. Draft strategy
for resident engagement,
pilot, gather input from
selected residents, refine
and finalize
40 10 hours/ $200
per hour=
$2,000
30 hours/ $150
per hour=
$4,500
$6,500
Task 1c. Finalize
subcontracts; work with
consultants to develop
scopes of work; priority
population of focus for
each consultant; tasks;
develop and finalize mini
grant guidelines.
15 10 hours/ $150
per hour=
$1500
5 hours/ $90 per
hour= $450
HEC to execute
subcontract
with Latino
Leadership
Council to
engage Latino
residents for
resident
feedback = 150
hours x $200/
hour = $30,000
$57,950

Page 322 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
HEC to execute
$10,000
subcontract
with local
community
organizer, Alma
Caravarin, to
support lowincome
engagement
and to aid
neighborhood
association
with increased
diversity
$50 an hour x
200 hours=
$10,000
HEC to execute
agreement with
data analysis
consultantMiriam Nuno,
PhD, UC Davis
$200.00/hour x
80 hours=
$16,000.00
Task 2: Engagement Plan Task 2
Total:
$39,635
Task 2a. Establish 40 20 hours/ $200 $5,800
program goals. per hour=
$4,000
20 hours/ $90
per hour=
$1,800

Page 323 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
Task 2b. Identify events,
engagement
opportunities; solidify
30 20 hours/ $150
per hour=
$3,000
• $10 gift cards x
300 surveys=
$3,000
• $25 gift cards x
100 residents
during
listening
sessions=
$2,500
• $50 gift cards x
40 interviews=
$2,000
$3,900
(Staff)
+$7,500
(Supplies/Ma
terials)
= $11,400
outreach plan. Purchase
incentives for outreach. 10 hours/ $90
per hour= $900
Task 2c. Create strategy
and process for resident
input; develop themes/
30 20 hours/ $150
per hour=
$3,000
$3,900
discussion topics;
develop timeline;
identify methodology for
10 hours/ $90
per hour= $900
engagement; identify
measurement tools and
materials for community
engagement.

Task 2d. Collaborate with 67 20 hours/ $200
per hour=
$4,000
20 hours/ $150
per hour=
$3,000
27 hours/ $55
per hour =
$1,485
$8,485
subcontractors to review
data and consult on
tools, assist in analysis,
assist in outreach and
engagement among
specific resident
subgroups.

Review- survey
instruments; pilot;
integrate results;
prepare reports.

Task 2e. Conduct
planning meetings with
stakeholders & residents
40 20 hours/ $150
per hour=
$3,000
Meeting material
costs (food,
interpretation):
$4,800
(Staff) +
$4,500
(Supplies/Ma
terials =
$9,300
$2,500

Page 324 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
20 hours/ $90
per hour=
$1,800
Printing of survey
tools $2,000

Page 325 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
Task 2f. Solidify Project
Timeline
5 5 hours/ $150
per hour= $750
$750
Task 3: Plan Execution Task 3
Total:
$19,850
Task 3a. Implement
resident engagement
activities.
105- HECStaff
hours +
subcontractor
hours
25 hours/ $90
per hour=
$2,250
• Listening
Session food
costs $150per
meeting x 10
sessions =
$1,500
• Meeting
rental/cleaning
fees= $500
$6,650
(Staff) +
$2,000
(Supplies/Ma
terials) =
$8,650
40 hours / $55
per hour x 2
staff= $4,400
Task 3b. Train facilitators 20 10 hours/ $90 $1,450
in appropriate languages per hour= $900
and measurement tools.
5 hours/ $55 per
hour x 2= $550
Task 3c. Schedule 30 10 hours/ $90 $2,000
interviews, focus groups, per hour= $900
and related activities.
20 hours / $55
per hour=
$1,100
Task 3d. Recruit
participants for feedback
40 20 hours/ $55
per hour x 2=
$2,200
$2,200
Task 3e. Conduct data 20 10 hours/ $150
per hour=
$1,500
10 hours/ $90
per hour= $900
$2,400
collection engagement
activities; work with
consultant to analyze
data
Task 3f. Review draft 25 15 hours/$150
per
hour=$2,250
10 hours/ $90
per hour= $900
$3,150
analysis; share findings
with residents;
incorporate feedback on
findings to integrate
comments.

Task 4: Evaluation Task 4
Total:
$11,415

Page 326 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
Task 4a. Pre/post survey
development
40 20 hours/ $150
per hour=
$3,000
20 hours/ $90
per hour=
$1,800
$4,800
Task 4b. Data Collection 35 10 hours/ $90
per hour= $900
25 hours/ $55
per hour=
$1,375
• Jotform
software
annual fee =
$590
$2,275
(Staff) + $590
(Supplies/Ma
terials =
$2,865
Task 4c. Summarize
findings
25 HEC Staff/
Communication
team in-kind
25 hours/ $150
per hour=
$3,750
Work with City
of Roseville’s
Communication
team to cobrand
consultant for
design of
reports,
presentations
and visuals for
residents to
obtain feedback
(in-kind)
$3,750
Task 5: Final Deliverables Task 5
Total:
$25,750
Task 5a-c. Project
Closeout Reports; write
summary, lessons
learned, outcomes and
opportunities
120 40 hours/ $200
per hour=
$8,000
80 hours/ $150
per hour=
$12000
$20,000
Task 5d. Present findings
to Roseville City Council,
Sierra College, the
chambers, business
15 5 hours/ $200
per hour=
$1,000
$3,250

Page 327 of 1281 ends

City of Roseville Scope of Work
alliance and other
workforce development
groups which includes
resident representatives.
15 hours/ $150
per hour=
$2,250
Task 5e. Document next
steps and obtain City
Council and other
stakeholder support.
15 5 hours/ $200
per hour=
$1,000
10 hours/ $150
per hour=
$1,500
$2,500
Total Budget Request: $169,600

Page 328 of 1281 ends

ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Engage, Empower, Implement Grant project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

Page 329 of 1281 ends

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 07/03/2025
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCAL YEAR:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
2270 5301 84001 700078 169,600
Establish Professional Services budget for the Roseville Invest Health Data Challenge Engage, Empower,
Implement Collaboration project.
2270 5081 84001 700078 10,400
Establish Internal Labor budget for the Roseville Invest Health Data Challenge Engage, Empower, Implement
Collaboration project.

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 180,000

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
2270 4410 84001 700078 180,000
Establish State Grant revenue budget for the Roseville
Invest Health Data Challenge Engage, Empower,
Implement Collaboration project.

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL 180,000

NET ADJUSTMENT -

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000

FUND BALANCE TOTAL -
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Economic Development Department recommends that Council authorize the establishment of a new Non-Capital Multiyear Project – Roseville Invest Health Data Challenge Engage, Empower, Implement Collaboration (700078), and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $180,000 in the Grants Fund to the Project. The City of Roseville was awarded a Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Engage, Empower, Implement (EEI) state grant (funded by Caltrans) totaling $180,000.

Through this project, Roseville residents located in historically disadvantaged areas and the community at large will identify and develop resident-driven solutions to help the city, local businesses, and education leaders restructure and implement programming to improve access to employment opportunities and address barriers for low-income individuals who are underemployed and face challenges with access to affordable housing and job training opportunities.

Gina McColl, Economic Development Analyst 2025-26
Claudia Carreno, Budget Analyst
Economic Development

Page 330 of 1281 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 8/20/2025
Item #: VII.6
File #: 0704
Item ID: 2025-531
Title: Biological Monitoring Services - Professional Services Agreement Contact: Eric Dexter 916-746-1769 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement to provide biological monitoring services with Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting, Inc. in the amount of $235,000 in the current fiscal year, with an option to extend the agreement in one (1) year increments for up to an additional four (4) years, and to authorize the City Manager to execute this agreement as well as annual renewals without further Council approval. The total not-to-exceed amount for five years is $1,257,921, which includes costs to provide routine services, monitor future natural areas and on-call biological monitoring services for various City departments. Funding is included in the Parks, Recreation and Libraries budget in various City funds, including the Open Space Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a professional services agreement with Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting, Inc. and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

Staff additionally requests authority for the City Manager or his designee to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville owns and manages over 4,300 acres of natural land. Of this, approximately 1,800 acres are designated as formal preserves, and another 1,000 acres are classified as general open space, which includes the City’s creek system.

The preserve areas were established as part of the federal wetland permitting process that authorized nearby development. These areas are managed in accordance with the City’s Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan (OSPOMP), which outlines the requirements for regular monitoring and reporting. Funding for OSPOMP implementation comes from preserve endowments, Community Facilities Districts (CFDs), Lighting and Landscape Districts (LLDs), or a combination of these sources, all of which are managed by the City.

The City also holds a Routine Maintenance Agreement (RMA) with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), which governs maintenance activities within designated floodplain areas. Under the RMA, habitat and nesting surveys must be conducted prior to any maintenance within the creek system.

Because these monitoring and reporting activities require specialized biological expertise, the City typically contracts out these services and uses the designated funding sources for payment.

Page 331 of 1281 ends

In June 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for biological monitoring and reporting services. Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting submitted a proposal in response, offering to perform the required annual monitoring under a one-year contract with the option for up to four annual renewals.

Following the proposal evaluation process, Vollmar’s submission was selected as the best value for the City.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total not-to-exceed contract amount is $1,257,921, which includes a 3% annual increase. Of this total, $849,136 will be allocated from the Open Space Fund, and $196,703 will come from the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department operating budget in various City funds. Funding for additional services will be identified based on City department service requests or for specific locations where work is needed or a new natural area is established.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Eric Dexter, Parks and Open Space Superintendent
Jill Geller, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-272

2. Professional Services Agreement
REVIEWERS:

Eric Dexter, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Maintenance Created/Initiated - 7/23/2025
Brian Castelluccio, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Maintenance
Approved - 7/23/2025
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 7/25/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/29/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 8/4/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/6/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/7/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/8/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 8/8/2025

Page 332 of 1281 ends

Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/8/2025

Page 333 of 1281 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-272

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND VOLLMAR NATURAL LANDS CONSULTING, INC., AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF

OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a professional services agreement for biological monitoring services, by and between the City of Roseville and Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 334 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025]

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Biological Monitoring Services
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting, Inc., a California corporation (“CONSULTANT”); and W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY desires professional services consisting of biological monitoring services; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has prepared a proposal in response to RFP #13-169 dated June 14, 2025, which describes the scope of work to be performed by CONSULTANT, the budget for the work, and the schedule for performance of the work; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified and experienced to provide such professional services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution and expire on June 30, 2026. The City Manager may, in his or her discretion, elect to extend the Agreement in one (1) year increments for up to an additional four (4) years by giving CONSULTANT thirty (30) days advance written notice of each optional one (1) year renewal. Such extensions shall be memorialized by a written amendment to this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 335 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 2 2. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

3. Compensation. For its services provided hereunder, CONSULTANT shall be compensated on a time and expense basis in accordance with the budget estimate as described in EXHIBIT “A”. Total compensation shall not exceed two hundred thirty-five thousand dollars ($235,000).

CONSULTANT shall submit one monthly invoice for its services. Such invoices shall be delineated by task, the person performing the services, and the hourly rate, which shall be stated in time increments of not greater than one tenth (1/10) hours. CITY shall pay invoices within thirty (30) days after receipt, if the services specified in the invoice have been satisfactorily completed.

4. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of CONSULTANT's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.

CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 336 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 3 intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONSULTANT’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

5. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Workers’ Compensation Statutory
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit
Professional Liability (errors and $1,000,000 per claim omissions) $2,000,000 aggregate
a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 337 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 4 volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 338 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 5 Furthermore, CONSULTANT shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under this Agreement. Additionally, CONSULTANT shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of CITY’s indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
f. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (“SIR”) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 339 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 6 6. Records. CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records relating to the services performed hereunder during the term of this Agreement and for a period of not less than one (1) year after the date of termination or expiration. Provided, however, that in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records until such litigation, appeals or claims are resolved. Duly authorized representatives of CITY shall have right of access during normal business hours and after reasonable notice to CONSULTANT’s and subcontractors’ files and records relating to the services performed hereunder and may review and copy the files and records at appropriate stages during performance of the services and during the one (1) year period following termination or expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provision in its contracts with all subcontractors.

7. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

8. Prevailing Wages. When applicable, for purposes of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall comply with all applicable prevailing wage laws, e.g., but not limited to, California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq. In accordance with said Section 1775, CONSULTANT shall forfeit as a penalty to the City two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates for such work or craft in which such worker is employed for any work done on-site under the Agreement by CONSULTANT or by any subcontractor in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code and in particular, Labor Code Sections 1770 to 1780, inclusive. In addition to said penalty and pursuant to said Section 1775, the difference between such stipulated prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof for Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 340 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 7 which each worker was paid less than the stipulated prevailing wage shall be paid to each worker by CONSULTANT or the applicable subcontractor.

Pursuant to the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1773, the contracting department has identified the source, stated below, of the general prevailing rate of wages applicable to the site to be done, for straight time, overtime, and holiday work. The holiday wage rate listed shall be applicable to all holidays recognized in the collective bargaining agreement of the particular craft, classification or type of worker concerned. These wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, general prevailing wage rates set forth above, which forms a part of this Agreement, shall be posted by CONSULTANT at a prominent place at the work site. Prevailing wage rates to be posted at the work site will be furnished by the contracting department. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by CONSULTANT in determining its proposal and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY or the Agreement.

9. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.

10. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time, ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement.

11. Public Contracts: Conflicts of Interest. CONSULTANT’s duties and services under this Agreement shall not include preparing or assisting CITY with any portion of the CITY’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 341 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 8 regarding a subsequent or additional contract with CITY. CITY shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. CONSULTANT’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications.

CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

12. Governing Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and its EXHIBITS, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern. In the event of any conflict between any of the EXHIBITS, the provisions of the first in order of attachment shall govern.

13. The Levine Act Disclosure. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to CITY elected or appointed officers totaling more than $250 within the twelve (12) months prior to the CITY decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by CONSULTANT and/or its agent(s), CONSULTANT is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.

14. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 342 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 9 CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

15. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT, inclusive of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, and subcontractors, shall act as an independent contractor, and covenants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status, that it will neither hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of CITY by reason of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s oncall needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

16. Representations and Warranties. CONSULTANT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 343 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 10 company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY shall have the right to terminate as void this Agreement, without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.

17. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

18. Copyright, Ownership and Use of Materials. All tangible material (“Material”) created or delivered pursuant to this Agreement is considered a work made for hire under the Copyright Act. To the extent such Material does not qualify as a work made for hire, CONSULTANT hereby assigns to CITY all right, title, and interest, including but not limited to all copyrights, in all Material created by CONSULTANT in its performance under this Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings (including computer aided drawings), papers, documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, and shall remain, the property of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

In the event that CONSULTANT uses, employs, designates, or retains any person or entity who is not an employee of CONSULTANT, to perform any work required of it pursuant to this Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 344 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 11 Agreement, CONSULTANT shall require said person or entity to execute an agreement containing the preceding paragraph.

19. Termination of Agreement. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CITY thirty (30) days advance written notice. In the event of termination through no fault of CONSULTANT, CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for services performed as of the date of termination, upon the release to CITY of all Material hereunder, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. CITY retains the right to receive and use any Material, notwithstanding any termination or any dispute regarding the amount to be paid.

20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

21. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

22. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 345 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] 12 23. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT
Eric Dexter Linnea Neuhaus
Parks & Open Superintendent Senior Ecologist/Project Mgr. 316 Vernon Street, Ste. 400 2401 Capital Avenue, Ste. 301 Roseville, CA 95678 Sacramento, CA 95816
Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

24. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a VOLLMAR NATURAL LANDS
municipal corporation CONSULTING, INC., a California
corporation
BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
and
ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY: _______________________________
Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA Secretary
President
John Vollmar
John Vollmar

Page 346 of 1281 ends

Page 347 of 1281 ends

[B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\Vollmar PSA.docx;07/10/2025] EXHIBIT “A”
Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 348 of 1281 ends

SACRAMENTO OFFICE
2401 Capitol Avenue, Suite 301
Sacramento, CA 95816
Phone: 916/758-6928
Fax: 510/559-9605
www.vollmarconsulting.com
June 13, 2025
Mr. Eric Dexter
Parks & Open Space Superintendent
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
SUBJECT: Cover Letter for Proposal to Provide Biological Monitoring Services for the City of Roseville
Dear Mr. Dexter,
Please find enclosed Vollmar Natural Land Consulting’s proposal to provide biological monitoring services for the City of Roseville. We present an expert team experienced with conducting biological monitoring and with a proven track record of developing practical, cost-effective management recommendations for preserve lands. All of our team members have years of in-depth experience within the City’s preserves themselves and in numerous other preserves throughout central California with similar resources.

The following information is provided as requested in the City’s Request for Proposals (RFP):

Title of RFP: RFP 13-169 Biological Monitoring Services Name of Company: Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting, Inc.

Mailing Address: 2401 Capitol Avenue, Suite 301, Sacramento, CA 95816 Contact Person: Linnea Neuhaus; Phone: 916-758-6928 (office) OR 925-470-0304 (cell); Fax: 510-559-9605
Email: [email protected]
Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting, if awarded this contract, will dutifully perform the services presented in this proposal and will adhere to the requirements described in the RFP.

We look forward to the opportunity to continue working with the City to implement and continue to improve an exceptional monitoring program that contributes to the long-term conservation of the City’s Open Space Preserves.

Sincerely,
John Vollmar
President/Senior Ecologist
Linnea Neuhaus
Senior Ecologist/Proposed Project Manager
Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 349 of 1281 ends

PROPOSALTOPROVIDE

BIOLOGICALMONITORINGSERVICES

FORTHECITYOFROSEVILLE
SacramentoOffice
2401CapitolOffice,Suite301
Sacramento,CA95816
(916)758-6928
www.vollmarconsulting.com
PreparedFor:

PreparedBy:

CityofRoseville
Attn:CityClerkDepartment
311VernonStreet
Roseville,CA95678
VollmarNaturalLandsConsulting
2401CapitolAvenue,Suite301
Sacramento,CA95816
Contact:LinneaNeuhaus
(916)758-6928
[email protected]
June2025
VOLLMARNATURALLANDSCONSULTING|BERKELEY •SACRAMENTO •ARCATA Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 350 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal i June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Firm’s Qualifications.............................................................................................................................1 A.1 Firm Organization..............................................................................................................................1 B. Experience and References....................................................................................................................2 C. Qualifications of Team...........................................................................................................................4 C.1 Team Overview..................................................................................................................................4 C.2 Descriptions of Team Members Experience and Qualifications........................................................5 D. Project Understanding...........................................................................................................................8 E. Project Plan...........................................................................................................................................10 E.1 Project Plan Overview......................................................................................................................10 E.2 Complete Task Descriptions............................................................................................................11 F. Cost Proposal ........................................................................................................................................19 G. Required Statements/Documents .......................................................................................................21 H. Exceptions.............................................................................................................................................26 I. Competency of Proposers.....................................................................................................................26 Table 1: List of Reference Projects
Table 2: Field Survey Summary for Proposed Open Space Preserve Monitoring Table 3: Hourly Rates for On-Call Consulting Services
Table 4: Proposed Budget
Appendix A. VNLC Grazing Memo 2021
Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 351 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 1 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting A. Firm’s Qualifications
Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting (VNLC) is a natural resources consulting company specializing in regional conservation studies, strategic preserve design, and the establishment, management, and monitoring of preserve lands. Founded in 1996, the company currently has offices in Berkeley, Sacramento, and Arcata, with 24 employees. Additional company information is available at www.vollmarconsulting.com. This project would be managed through our Sacramento office, with supporting staff from our Sacramento and Berkeley offices.

VNLC is eminently qualified to complete the monitoring tasks outlined in the City of Roseville’s (City) Request for Proposals (RFP). We are recognized experts in the ecology, management and monitoring of vernal pools and associated annual grasslands. Over the past decade, we have developed and implemented numerous vernal pool grassland monitoring programs for a variety of clients and have conducted monitoring and baseline surveys on more than 60,000 acres of preserve lands throughout the Central Valley including Placer County. We also have extensive experience related to the management and monitoring of seasonal wetlands, riparian habitats, and oak woodlands.

Beyond our management and monitoring experience, we have overseen the establishment of numerous conservation and mitigation preserves including leading agency consultations and permitting, completing Property Analysis Records to determine financial endowments, negotiating conservation easements with third-party easement holders, and other required tasks. Through our combined experiences, we have developed a thorough understanding of the varying approaches to preserve monitoring as well as an understanding of the broader context within which monitoring occurs related to agency requirements, available funding, and other parameters.

This proposal is for all of the services indicated in the City’s RFP. VNLC is both qualified to conduct the tasks described in the scope of services, and experienced in conducting them on the City’s Preserves.

A.1 Firm Organization
VNLC organizes each of its projects with a Principal-in-Charge and dedicated Project Manager. The Project Manager directs other team members including Senior and Staff Ecologists. The team organization for the current project is indicated below. All senior ecologists (and most staff ecologists) hold federal and state permits to conduct surveys for the listed and other special-status species that may be encountered during the course of the project surveys. Staffing levels within the company have been slowing increasing over the past five years, with 24 current employees.
• Management Team Members:

John Vollmar – Principal-in-Charge; Senior Ecologist/Preserve Land Management Specialist Linnea Neuhaus – Project Manager; Senior Ecologist
Anton Bokisch – Field Lead; Senior Ecologist
• Supporting Team Members in Sacramento Office:

Eric Smith – Senior Ecologist/GIS Specialist
Roxanne Foss – Senior Ecologist/Rangeland Specialist
Trevor Hurd – Staff Ecologist
Stephanie Wilker – Staff Ecologist
Diego Salgado – Staff Ecologist
• Supporting Team Members in Berkeley Office:

Jake Schweitzer – Senior Ecologist/GIS Specialist
Maria Vollmar – Staff Ecologist
Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 352 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 2 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting B. Experience and References
VNLC possesses the technical, management, and logistical expertise required to successfully complete the proposed project. This expertise has been demonstrated through our successful completion of the annual biological monitoring for the City over the past fifteen years, and through our many other successful contracts with similar clients, including the City of Rocklin, Placer Land Trust, Environmental Stewardship Foundation, City of Healdsburg, and Marin Municipal Water District. Table 1, below, summarizes some of our key projects and references that exemplify our company experience relevant to the proposed project.

From a technical perspective, we have in-depth field experience with all of the habitats and species that occur within the City’s preserves. Conducting the biological monitoring for the City over the last fifteen years has given us a comprehensive understanding of both the biological functions and challenges specific to the City’s preserves. During this time, we have worked to develop a comprehensive, integrated dataset, and have provided clear and concise interpretations of those data for the City’s preserve manager. It is our goal to continue to build this dataset over the next five years, furthering our ability to analyze trends in the preserves and quantitatively present potential management concerns and successes to the City.

From a management perspective, we have decades of experience managing large-scale survey and monitoring projects similar in scope and complexity to the proposed project. Since 1996, we have completed more than 700 projects, many involving large-scale, multi-faceted field surveys and data collection focused on the habitats and species present within the City’s Preserves. Through these projects, we have developed sound management practices that ensure quality control throughout all aspects of the project including preliminary review, field surveys, data collection and management, reporting, and client communications.

From a logistical perspective, VNLC possesses the necessary field and office equipment for the project including eight professional Trimble GPS units, iPads, water-quality meters, top-level GIS software, and large format color plotters and printers.

We are very familiar with the City’s preserve network, having conducted the biological monitoring for the past fifteen years under three previous contracts (2009-2025). During our time monitoring the City’s preserves, we have evaluated the ecological conditions and made clear management recommendations to improve or maintain those conditions. For each monitoring year, we have indicated the overall ‘effectiveness’ of the preserves in maintaining the sensitive resources for which they were established to protect. We have analyzed and improved our own monitoring methods, and will continue to strive to improve the accuracy and efficiency of each survey, each year. We have always strived to maintain a strong working relationship with the City, and prioritized clear communication, cooperation, and efficient identification of biological issues.

Finally, our passion for protecting the habitats within the City’s preserves, along with our extensive preserve experience, allow us to identify potential issues and also potential monitoring and management improvements and opportunities. For example, in recent years we have initiated on-site fairy shrimp biology and identification trainings for City staff, and hosted an off-site field trip for City staff to visit and learn about a large protected ranch with similar vernal pool habitats. We have also worked with City staff to identify ways to improve efficiency for the goat grazing program and to cut grazing costs for future years.

We will continue to strive to identify not only potential issues within the preserves, but also identify new opportunities to improve the City’s management and understanding of the habitats within the preserves.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 353 of 1281 ends

Table 1. Selected list of reference projects relevant to the proposed City of Roseville Biological Monitoring Services Project.

PROJECT NAME CLIENT

REGION/

ACREAGE DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville Preserve Monitoring Project 2009 - present City of Roseville Contact: Michael Neumann 2005 Hilltop Circle Roseville, CA 95747 (916) 774-5748 Placer County/
~1,000 acres
VNLC conducts annual biological monitoring within the City of Roseville’s system of 32 open space and mitigation preserves, including approximately 190 vernal pools and other seasonal wetlands and associated upland habitat. Monitoring includes aquatic invertebrates, water quality, wetland and adjacent upland floristics, invasive species, oak tree recruitment, RDM, and general habitat conditions. VNLC provides management recommendations, such as grazing and fencing, for the aquatic and adjacent upland habitats. At the start of the project, VNLC reviewed the ‘Overarching Management Plan’ as well as past monitoring reports, developed a set of recommendations for stream-lining and improving the effectiveness of the monitoring, and helped the City consult with the regulatory agencies to modify the monitoring efforts.

City of Rocklin Preserve Monitoring Project 2023 - present City of Rocklin Contact: Rick Lawrence 4081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677 (916) 625-5500 Placer County/
~630 acres
VNLC conducts annual biological monitoring within the City’s system of 600 acres of open space preserves. Monitoring categories include general preserve condition, invasive plants, vernal pool invertebrates, hydrology, and floristics, grassland health, thatch and residual dry matter, special-status plants, birds, and reptiles and amphibians. VNLC provides management recommendations and prepares annual monitoring reports. VNLC also assists with other on-call tasks such as permit compliance, nesting bird surveys, construction monitoring, and agency consultation.

Placer Land Trust Vernal Pool/Seasonal Wetland Monitoring Project 2007 – present Placer Land Trust Contact: Elias Grant 922 Lincoln Way, Suite 200 Auburn, CA 95603 (530) 887-9222 Placer County/
~900 acres
Long-term annual aquatic monitoring of vernal pools/seasonal wetlands on two preserves owned and managed by the Placer Land Trust near Lincoln, CA (Doty Ravine Preserve and Swainson’s Preserve). Monitoring parameters include listed large branchiopods, other aquatic invertebrates, and hydrology. A general management plan was in place before monitoring began, but VNLC has worked closely with PLT to develop and refine monitoring protocols tailored to each preserve and to the goals of land managers. VNLC prepares agency and annual reports.

Environmental Stewardship Foundation Preserve Monitoring Project 2010 - present ESF Contact: Mark Morse 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 600 Sacramento, CA 95815 (916) 521-6418 Sacramento, El
Dorado, and
Placer
Counties
~380 acres
VNLC conducts long-term annual monitoring and provides management recommendations for thirteen open space preserves. Preserve habitats include vernal pool grasslands, oak woodlands, seasonal and perennial wetlands, and perennial creeks and associated riparian habitats. Surveys are conducted for large branchiopod, hydrologic, and floristic monitoring on vernal pool preserves. VNLC prepares a separate annual report for each preserve, including detailed maps showing locations of recommended site-specific management actions.

Marin Municipal Water District Open Services Contract 2009 - present Marin Municipal Water District Corte Madera, CA Contact: Dain Anderson, Environmental Services Coordinator (415) 945-1586 Central Marin
County
Throughout
MMWD Lands
VNLC provides a wide range of environmental services to the MMWD. Services include habitat assessments, rare plant surveys, vegetation surveys and mapping, and wetland delineations. The service area includes a variety of habitats throughout central Marin County, from annual and native grasslands, to serpentine chaparral, to oak woodlands, to redwood forest, to stream corridors and lakes.

Lazy K Ranch Mitigation Preserve Projects 2007 - present Lazy K Ranch LLC Chowchilla, CA Contact: Larry Knapp, Land Owner (559) 760-0607 Madera and
Merced
Counties
~ 1,450 acres
VNLC established a 93-acre mitigation preserve in 2009, and is currently establishing an approximately 185-acre mitigation bank on this private ranch. These sites include preserved and restored vernal pools, annual grasslands, seasonal wetlands, riparian woodlands, and oak woodlands. The project involves multiyear surveys for wildlife and plant resources, preparation of comprehensive vernal pool restoration plans, interim and long-term management and monitoring plans, and all bank permitting. VNLC designed and oversaw the construction of vernal pools on the established preserve, and will begin construction on the mitigation bank in the near future.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 354 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 4 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting C. Qualifications of Team
C.1 Team Overview
We believe that having an experienced, cohesive project team is perhaps the most critical element for ensuring the successful completion of the monitoring services. The team will be conducting similar monitoring tasks on most preserves but will need to be aware of the conditions and requirements that differ between preserves. VNLC’s team includes six senior ecologists available to work on the project, all of whom hold federal and state permits to conduct surveys for federally-listed vernal pool branchiopods. These team members have worked together extensively both within the City’s preserves and on a broad range of preserve monitoring and baseline survey projects involving similar habitats and monitoring methods to those conducted within the preserves. These team members also have extensive experience developing and implementing monitoring plans and adjusting these plans as necessary to improve monitoring practices and data collection. All of our senior team members are experienced and qualified to survey for the full suite of preserve resources and characteristics, further adding to our capacity to conduct consistent data collection.

The organizational chart below displays our proposed project team, which includes the six core staff members from VNLC; other company employees from both the Berkeley and Sacramento offices will augment this staff as needed.

Figure 1. Organization Chart
All team members may be involved in the field surveys and report preparation. The whole project team is based out of both our Sacramento and Berkeley offices. Linnea Neuhaus, as project manager, will serve as the primary point of contact with the City and will lead all project coordination, planning, and reporting.

Anton Bokisch, as field lead, will oversee all field preparations and field surveys. John Vollmar (along with Ms. Neuhaus) will meet with City representatives over the course of the project to discuss the overall monitoring effort for the project term. Mr. Vollmar will also serve as the lead for overall preserve John Vollmar
Principal-in-Charge
Berkeley Office
Linnea Neuhaus
Project Manager
Sacramento Office
Anton Bokisch
Field Lead
Sacramento Office
Jake Schweitzer
Senior Ecologist
Berkeley Office
Roxanne Foss
Rangeland Specialist
Sacramento Office
Eric Smith
Senior Ecologist
Sacramento Office
Additional Support
Staff
Berkeley Office
Additional Support
Staff
Sacramento Office
Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 355 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 5 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting assessment and development of any recommended changes to preserve management and monitoring methods. Brief descriptions of relevant expertise for all key team members are provided below. Resumes are available upon request.

C.2 Descriptions of Team Members Experience and Qualifications John Vollmar, Principal-in-Charge – B.S. Natural History/Evolution, UC Berkeley, 1990. Mr. Vollmar, founder and president of VNLC, is a senior botanist, wetland ecologist, and aquatic wildlife biologist with over 30 years of professional research and consulting experience. During his career, he has served as the project director and senior biologist for more than 500 projects. In recent years, his work has focused on large-scale biological site assessments and surveys, conservation easement and mitigation transactions, and conservation land management, monitoring, and restoration.

Mr. Vollmar is a recognized expert on the ecology of vernal pool grasslands. He has conducted several pioneering studies related to vernal pool grassland ecology and management including: publication of a regional study of the vernal pool grasslands of eastern Merced County covering more than 150,000 acres and 40+ special-status species that is currently being used as a basis for regional conservation planning; coauthoring a review of available literature on the effects of livestock grazing on vernal pools; and directing a Central Valley-wide study of the ‘effectiveness’ of small vernal pool grassland preserves.

Mr. Vollmar holds a federal permit to conduct surveys for listed vernal pool large branchiopods and California tiger salamander. He has surveyed more than 5,000 pools throughout California. These surveys have included habitat assessments and floristic inventories as well as targeted surveys for special-status fairy and tadpole shrimp, amphibians, and plants. He has discovered hundreds of new special-status plant and aquatic wildlife occurrences including many federally-listed species. He has gained a very refined understanding of the preferred microhabitats for most of special-status plant and wildlife species that occur within Central Valley vernal pools and grasslands. Mr. Vollmar has also conducted extensive surveys and monitoring studies within Central Valley oak woodland, riparian, and perennial marsh habitats, residual dry matter (RDM)sampling, and surveys for grassland-dwelling ground nesting birds. He has completed dozens of wetland delineations and has developed and implemented vernal pool and other wetland restoration and creation plans. Mr. Vollmar has directed many large-scale vernal pool monitoring and baseline surveys for a range of conservation and mitigation projects. Through these projects, Mr. Vollmar has gained expert insight into the range of available monitoring methods, the most suitable, cost-effective methods for a particular site, and the problems that can be encountered during development and implementation of largescale monitoring efforts.

Mr. Vollmar is also an expert on the establishment and management of preserve lands. He has overseen the establishment of mitigation and conservation preserves on more than 30,000 acres in California. He has developed and implemented numerous preserve land management and monitoring plans for various public and private clients. Most of these plans have focused on habitats and species similar to those on the City Preserves. Through his work, Mr. Vollmar has gained a reputation for developing practical, cost-effective management and monitoring strategies. Given his experience with preserve establishment, he also understands the larger regulatory and financial context within which management and monitoring occur.

Linnea Neuhaus, Project Manager – B.S. Environmental Science and Management (concentration in ecology, biodiversity, and evolution), University of California, Davis, 2012. Ms. Neuhaus brings over 13 years of diverse experience in non-profit, local government, and private consulting fields. She has worked with VNLC since 2015, and managed a variety of projects in northern California including short- and longterm monitoring of preserve lands, riparian and wetland design and monitoring, biological evaluations, habitat assessments, and rare plant and wildlife surveys, for a variety of clients including the City of Roseville, City of Rocklin, Alameda County Public Works Agency, and City of Healdsburg. Since 2016, Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 356 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 6 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting Ms. Neuhaus has been Project Manager and Designated Biologist for the City of Roseville, managing annual biological monitoring, permit compliance, and on-call biological services within 32 preserves encompassing over 1,000 acres in Placer County. Ms. Neuhaus is also Project Manager and Designated Biologist for the City of Rocklin’s Open Space Preserve Monitoring Project, which similarly involves biological monitoring and reporting within over 550 acres of preserve land in Rocklin, California. Since 2018, Ms. Neuhaus has worked with the City of Healdsburg as Project Manager and Designated Biologist for several projects involving permit compliance, biological surveys and monitoring, and riparian restoration planning and performance monitoring.

Ms. Neuhaus holds federal and state permits to survey for California red-legged frog, California tiger salamander, and vernal pool large branchiopods, and has experience surveying for various additional sensitive species including foothill yellow-legged frog, western spadefoot, burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk, western snowy plover, nesting birds, vernal pool aquatic invertebrates, and rare plants. She has experience with survey methods such as California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM), electroshocking, seining, dipnetting, mist netting, visual encounter and spotlight surveys, and water quality testing. She is proficient in ArcGIS, Microsoft Office, and Adobe Creative Suite software and data collection using Trimble GPS units.

Anton Bokisch – B.S. Environmental Science & Management, California Polytechnic State University, Humboldt, 2020. Mr. Bokisch’s undergraduate work focused on plant taxonomy, ecology, conservation, restoration of native habitats, and GIS. He has worked with VNLC since 2021, and has experience with survey methods such as trawling, seining, dipnetting, and night spotlighting. He is proficient in ArcGIS, Microsoft Office, data collection and Trimble GPS units. Mr. Bokisch has conducted botanical and rare plant surveys, amphibian visual encounter and spotlight surveys, and surveys for several sensitive species including amphibian larvae (including California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander), western pond turtle, western snowy plover, California least tern, and vernal pool aquatic invertebrates. He spent several summers working in the Cascade Range sampling dozens of rapid assessment and relevé plots through which he gained significant plant identification experience. Mr. Bokisch previously worked for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a part of the Delta Juvenile Fish Monitoring Program, performing mark/recapture studies, fish and habitat assessments, and Kodiak and Mid-water trawls in the California Delta.

Mr. Bokisch has applied his skills to many projects in Northern California and the Central Valley with VNLC. His field experience includes biological inspections, rare plant surveys and monitoring, wetland and upland vegetation monitoring, wetland delineations, and wetland design. He has conducted and led field surveys in both the Cities of Roseville and Rocklin open space preserves for the past three years. He also holds federal permits to sample for vernal pool branchiopods and larval California tiger salamander.

Jake Schweitzer – B.A. Physical Geography (concentration in ecology and geographic information science), University of California, Berkeley 1995. Mr. Schweitzer combines 13 years of experience as a professional vegetation and wetland ecologist with over 18 years of experience in cartography and geographic information science (GIS, remote sensing/image analysis, and GPS technology). His ecological focus has been in botanical and wetland sciences. He holds federal and state permits to survey for listed fairy shrimp, California red-legged frog, and California tiger salamander and is certified in the vegetation mapping techniques developed by the California Native Plant Society and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. He has conducted surveys and produced vegetation and wetland maps at various scales for numerous projects throughout California. Mr. Schweitzer has been a docent for the past eight years at the East Bay Regional Park Botanic Garden, teaching native California plant ecology to the public.

Mr. Schweitzer has worked with VNLC since 2005 and applied his skills to a wide array of projects, from surveying and modeling threats posed by Sudden Oak Death Syndrome, to performing large-scale botanical Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 357 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 7 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting and aquatic wildlife surveys, to designing habitat restoration projects. He has served as lead field ecologist and GIS specialist for many of VNLC’s regional conservation and land use projects from the Bay Area to the San Joaquin Valley and Sierra Nevada Foothills. He has led survey and mapping efforts at the 8,000- acre Walker Ridge Proposed Wind Energy Site (Colusa and Lake Counties), the 1,600-acre Tres Vaqueros Wind Energy Site (Contra Costa County), the 1,300-acre Calabazas Creek Open Space Preserve (Sonoma County), and the 16,000-acre Rancho Arroyo Seco Land Use and Mitigation Bank Project (western Amador County). He is currently overseeing a federally funded project involving the propagation and reintroduction of the critically endangered large-flowered fiddleneck (Amsinckia grandiflora) into its historic range, and is also managing a project involving surveys and mapping biological resources on private ranchlands throughout California’s Central Coast Ranges.

Roxanne Foss – M.S. Range Management, UC Berkeley, 2016. Ms. Foss is an ecologist with a robust understanding of science-based adaptive land management, field survey protocols, and ecological principles. Ms. Foss received her B.S. in Conservation and Resource Studies, M.S. in Range Management, and Graduate Certificate in Geospatial Information, Science and Technology from University of California, Berkeley. Ms. Foss has worked with VNLC since 2009 and has led document preparation, data management, geospatial analysis, and supporting field work for numerous land management projects in coastal, Bay Area, Central Valley, and Sierra Nevada working landscapes.

A representation of the diversity of projects Ms. Foss has managed include: a water quality rangeland improvement grant, grassland mapping and rapid assessment, riparian restoration, native plant nursery operation and volunteer programs, rare plant population modeling, CEQA and NEPA compliance, and biological preserve monitoring. As a project manager, she has collaborated with agency partners, academic collaborators, private ranching operations, non-profit land trusts, environmental advocacy groups and volunteers. She has established positive and productive working relationships with contractors and subcontractors in construction, biological consulting, and invasive plant management companies. She is active in local conservation groups and is currently on the Board of Directors for the California-Pacific Section of the Society for Rangeland Management.

Eric Smith – B.A. Biology, UC Davis 2006; GIS Certificate, San Jose State University, 2009. Mr. Smith’s education and professional focus are on terrestrial and wetland ecology, and the use of spatial and statistical analytic techniques to interpret ecological data. His primary expertise lies in the biology of amphibians and of vernal pools, and he holds federal permits to survey for California tiger salamander, California redlegged frog, and vernal pool branchiopods. He uses these skills to design and participate in numerous successful surveys for special-status species, to map habitats both on the ground and predictively with remote data, and to design and implement habitat restoration and creation plans. He is proficient in the field with professional-grade GPS units, and in the office with ArcGIS, Microsoft Office, statistics packages, and database software with SQL.

Working with VNLC since 2011, Mr. Smith has worked directly with private companies, non-profit corporations, and government entities. His project experience includes analyzing potential impacts, designing mitigation, and obtaining environmental permits, as well as creating management plans for preserves and analyzing funding needs. He acts as both a team leader and support staff: he manages projects from small one-time wetland delineations and species surveys to large multi-year permitting and monitoring; he also participates as a team member on others’ projects, providing support for GIS and mapping, quantitative analysis, document preparation, and species expertise.

Mr. Smith’s recent representative project experience includes directing pond and stream amphibian studies on six open space preserves for the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority, serving as the assistant director for a long-term study of the California tiger salamander breeding dynamics in the eastern San Joaquin Valley involving six study sites and more than 120 breeding ponds, and serving as the lead designer Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 358 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 8 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting for vernal pool-mima mound restoration on a 500-acre mitigation preserve for the California High Speed Rail project. On this last project, Mr. Smith used a combination of soil pits, LiDAR, and historical aerial imagery to design a landscape-level restoration design, then used drone-based imagery and topographic surveys to monitor implementation and results of the project.

D. Project Understanding
Over the past few decades, the City has assembled, through mitigation requirements and other means, a unique and somewhat sprawling set of Preserve Open Space and General Open Space areas scattered throughout the City boundaries, totaling approximately 2,944 acres. This project covers a subset of the Preserve Open Space areas (preserves) which have established management funding: 36 preserves are included in this project. Through our extensive experience with these preserves and other similar local preserves, combined with a review of other available information, we have gained an appreciation of the broad range of habitat types and conditions, management and monitoring requirements and challenges, land entitlements, and available funding sources related to the preserves. The Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan (Plan) provides guidance on consistent standardized monitoring and reporting for all of the preserves.

This project also covers jurisdictional boundaries of streams and drainages within the City, split into 1,000- foot stream segments. In 2017, the City entered into a 12-year Streambed Alteration Agreement for Routine Maintenance of Streams and Drainages (SAA or RMA) with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The SAA covers previously-approved jurisdictional boundaries of streams and drainages throughout the City where routine maintenance activities (such as trail maintenance, debris or obstruction, beaver dam and sediment removal, or vegetation control) will be performed. Through our experience working under the current SAA for the past eight years, we have gained an in-depth understanding of the survey and reporting requirements, habitats, and local access challenges, which has allowed us to streamline our survey approach and improve our efficiency in the field and office. Over the past eight years, our project staff have amassed extensive internal knowledge of stream access points, the (official and unofficial) network of streamside trails, and parking and accessibility within the City overall.

The Plan and the SAA, along with our 15 years of monitoring experience within the City’s preserves, will serve as the basis for the scope of work for the monitoring services contract. The key tasks to be performed under the monitoring contract will include:
• Completion of a range of wetland, upland, and riparian monitoring surveys and inspections within each of the preserves and along streams and drainages (described in more detail below); • Preparation of monitoring reports (for preserve and stream or nesting surveys); • Submittal of an annual Agency monitoring report and Agency coordination as needed; • Providing the City with preserve management and monitoring recommendations based on our field observations, assessments of monitoring data, and our experiences related to Plan review and implementation; and
• Other various on-call tasks as needed, which may include assistance with land dedication, grants, construction impacts and permits, and more.

The 2025 reporting season will be the 16th year during which the Plan will be implemented, and the ninth year under the current SAA. The implementation of both the Plan and SAA can be challenging given the large number of preserves and stream segments, range of conditions within these open space areas, and various types of surveys in different preserves. Over the last fifteen years, we have addressed these challenges with the following key elements to ensure the successful and smooth implementation of the monitoring activities:

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 359 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 9 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting

1. Experienced, Cohesive Project Team. As described above, we believe that having an experienced, cohesive project team is perhaps the most critical element for ensuring the successful completion of the monitoring tasks. Our company has a history of low staff turnover, which has resulted in a team with many years of experience working together on numerous, often complex preserve monitoring projects including the City of Roseville’s project. Our field biologists conduct tasks following standardized methods, and individual team members are responsible for identifying and communicating any recommended adjustments to monitoring activities. VNLC has a team of experienced biologists proposed for this project, all of whom are permitted to conduct surveys for federally-listed branchiopods, and who have worked together for many years on both the City’s preserves, and other preserve monitoring and survey projects involving similar habitats and monitoring methods. The team is actively involved in the monitoring procedures and has extensive expertise in adjusting these plans as necessary to improve monitoring practices and data collection.

Our team members are qualified to survey for the full suite of preserve resources and characteristics further adding to our capacity to conduct consistent, standardized data collection.

2. Well-developed Data Collection and Management Plan. The monitoring of the City’s preserves involves extensive data collection and multiple data categories covering numerous preserves. Our field data is collected using standardized ArcGIS Field Maps field forms and survey-specific data dictionaries loaded into GPS units prior to initiating surveys. Our team is familiar with the survey protocols and is briefed by the project manager and field lead before each survey. VNLC has developed a specialized database for the storage and analysis of the field data. This database is stored in Microsoft Access and enables VNLC to conduct the necessary data analysis to interpret biological trends in the preserves. Any additional written information is collected using standardized electronic data sheets related to general observations of preserve conditions and any recommendations for adjusting monitoring methods.

3. Well-developed Plan for Project Communication. Good communication within the project team and among the team, City, and Agencies is critical for ensuring the monitoring proceeds as planned and any potential changes to the monitoring methods are conveyed and approved by the City and Agencies before they are implemented. Our project manager will serve as the point-of-contact with the City. Our principal-in-charge (John Vollmar) and project manager (Linnea Neuhaus) will meet with the City each year to establish appropriate lines of communication and the timing for on-going communication during the course of the monitoring. We will only contact Agencies with the express approval of the City. We have worked on many past projects involving local governments such as the City and have developed good methods for coordination and communication with such entities.

The City staff clearly work to manage the preserves well, but there are some issues which present current challenges. For example, the current mapped wetland data for the preserves is outdated and highly inaccurate, which has led to mismanagement of certain habitats. Under this contract, VNLC biologists could efficiently update the wetland mapping for each preserve and provide an up-to-date geodatabase for the City to use when planning projects. Another issue that VNLC has been attempting to help with is reducing the cost of goat grazing within City preserves. VNLC has had several meetings with City staff over the last few years to identify ways to provide either cost neutral or even cost negative solutions (e.g., finding a grazer who would pay the City for grazing rights in certain areas) for grazing. A past memo summarizing VNLC’s grazing recommendations is included in Appendix A.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 360 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 10 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting E. Project Plan
Our monitoring proposal is divided into the five tasks and associated subtasks shown below, consistent with the requirements outlined in the RFP. Our specific approach for completing each task and subtask is described in detail below. The Preserve Field Surveys (Task 2) will be completed in seven survey rounds.

The types of surveys to be conducted during each round are summarized below in Table 2. Our proposed billing rates and budget for completion of these tasks is provided in the next section (Cost Proposal).

E.1 Project Plan Overview
TASK 1. BACKGROUND REVIEW AND FIELD PREPARATION
TASK 2. PRESERVE FIELD SURVEYS
Subtask 2a. Wet Season Vernal Pool Survey – 2 Rounds
Subtask 2b. Dry Season Vernal Pool Survey
Subtask 2c. Biological Inspection Survey
Subtask 2d. Upland Vegetation Survey
Subtask 2e. Invasive Weed Survey
Subtask 2f. Residual Dry Matter Survey
TASK 3. DATA ANALYSIS, REPORT PREPARATION, AND MANAGEMENT

RECOMMENDATIONS
Subtask 3a. Draft and Final Monitoring Reports
Subtask 3b. Agency Issues
TASK 4. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT SURVEYS AND REPORTING Subtask 4a. Special-status Species Habitat Surveys
Subtask 4b. Nesting Bird Surveys
Subtask 4c. RMA Report Preparation
Subtask 4d. Annual Special Status Species Awareness Training TASK 5. ON-CALL CONSULTATION SERVICES

OPTIONAL TASKS

1. Wet Season 20% Vernal Pool Survey – 2 Rounds

2. Dry Season 20% Vernal Pool Survey

3. Ground Nesting Surveys

4. Invasive Species Management Plan
Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 361 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 11 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting Table 2. Field Survey Summary for Proposed Open Space Preserve Monitoring.

Subtask Field Survey Location Purpose Survey Timing
2a Vernal Pool
Invertebrates and
Hydrology
20 selected
preserves, 10%
of vernal pools
Document and assess occurrences of
special-status large branchiopods, and
monitor overall aquatic invertebrate
community. Monitor for appropriate
hydrology of vernal pools.

Twice during
February/ March
2b Vernal Pool
Floristics and
Hydrology
20 selected
preserves, 10%
of vernal pools
Document and assess occurrences of
special-status plant species, and monitor
for appropriate vernal pool species
composition. Monitor for appropriate
hydrology of vernal pools.

April/ May
2c Biological
Inspections
All 36
preserves
Document overall condition of each
preserve and specific items in need of
management attention.

May/June/July
2d Upland
Vegetation
Survey
10 selected
preserves
Document the conditions of upland
habitats and monitor vegetation
characteristics such as thatch, native
species composition, and grazing.

April/May
2e Invasive Weed
Survey
All 36
preserves
Document the change in seven
problematic invasive species. Surveys
conducted in conjunction with
Biological Inspections.

May/June/July
(Concurrent with
Biological
Inspections)
2f Residual Dry
Matter Survey
15 selected
preserves
Document the RDM levels in preserves
surveyed in the upland vegetation
monitoring.

October/November
E.2 Complete Task Descriptions
TASK 1. BACKGROUND REVIEW AND FIELD PREPARATION
Prior to beginning monitoring surveys, we will prepare key site and project information including field maps, GIS data layers (preserve boundaries, vegetation community types, known special-status species occurrences, vernal pool and other wetland locations, etc.), species information, relevant resource inventories, technical information, and any other information important for conducting biological monitoring. The team will meet to discuss the goals for the next five years and what can be improved upon from the last fifteen years of monitoring, as well as discussing specific survey methods, to ensure consistency across surveyors.

John Vollmar (principal-in-charge) and Linnea Neuhaus (project manager) will meet with the City following our initial review to discuss available funding for the tasks laid out in this proposal, as well as to discuss any additional funding that may be available to further the biological monitoring and successful management of the preserves.

Ms. Neuhaus will review and make any necessary changes to further develop data management and project communication plans prior to the start of field surveys. VNLC believes that the current selection of 173 vernal pools should continue to be surveyed over the next five years, along with any vernal pools present within newly added preserves. Most of these vernal pools (145 of 173) were selected in 2009 based on the requirement for 10% of the pools to be monitored, and pools have been added to the sample over the years as new preserves have been added to the annual monitoring. The pools were selected using the model indicated below.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 362 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 12 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting In 2009, 145 pools (out of 1,311 mapped pools within the 24 preserves included in the original monitoring sample) were selected for sampling, to reach the minimum of 10% of pools. Since 2009, 28 pools have been added to the sample. All sampled vernal pools were (and will continue to be) selected for monitoring using the following stratified random method:

1. Pools were placed into one of five size (area) classes. Size classes were created such that the higher size classes contained fewer pools than the lowest size classes; therefore larger pools were intentionally overrepresented in the sample. We chose this method because there were very large numbers of very small pools, and few very large pools, and we wanted to ensure that medium to large pools were adequately represented by the sample. We did not have data on pool depth to include in the stratification.

2. Pools were stratified by the preserve in which they occurred, then stratified by type (created or preserved), then stratified into one of the five size classes. A random selection of pools was made within each preserve/type/size class grouping.

3. A minimum of 5 pools in every preserve were selected. If fewer than 5 pools were present in a preserve, all pools in the preserve were selected.

Monitoring this set of pools has provided consistent data over the last fifteen years which we have successfully used to determine the range of effectively functioning vernal pools and the function of vernal pools over time. This has led to management recommendations to adjust grazing (or other management concerns) if the vernal pools within a preserve do not meet the established standard. If funding becomes available in the future, VNLC would like to compile a comprehensive database of known occurrences of target species within the Preserves. If such funding becomes available, we may adjust the pool selection to include all pools with known occurrences of target species.

TASK 2. FIELD SURVEYS
Subtask 2a. Wet Season Vernal Pool Survey
2a-1. Aquatic Invertebrate Survey
The wet season vernal pool survey will be conducted twice during the wet season and will be timed to best detect target species (usually during January and February). Many vernal pool invertebrates, including the vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi), are relatively short-lived and the timing of best detection varies from year to year. We will track the ponding status and the hatching and development of target species in the project vicinity and/or within the project site and will time our survey accordingly. The survey will be conducted within a ten calendar-day period to minimize variation in survey results caused by differences in survey timing.

Surveys will be conducted by VNLC biologists permitted by the USFWS to conduct listed large branchiopod surveys, and will follow the methods outlined in Interim Survey Guidelines to Permittees for Recovery Permits under Section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act for Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods (ignoring the bi-weekly sampling frequency requirement). Surveyors will work alone to limit the cost to the City.

Each surveying biologist will carry a Trimble GeoXT (professional grade GPS unit) loaded with background layers showing preserve boundaries and vernal pools, provided by the City. Biologists will use the GPS to navigate to target pools and to map all special-status species and notable features or site conditions. Data will be recorded digitally within a standardized and survey-specific data dictionary loaded onto the GPS units. Representative photographs will be taken, to be included in reports.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 363 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 13 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting 2a-2. Wet Season Hydrological Monitoring
Wet season hydrological monitoring will be conducted concurrently with wet season invertebrate surveys.

Parameters to be measured will include the maximum current water depth, current water temperature, and percent area of inundation. This data will be recorded digitally within the GPS units.

Subtask 2b. Dry Season Vernal Pool Survey
2b-1. Floristic Monitoring
Floristic monitoring will be conducted on the same pools as were sampled during wet season invertebrate monitoring. As with wet season vernal pool surveys, the timing of floristic surveys will be determined by tracking local pools and conducting surveys at the peak of the vernal pool blooming season. The floristic surveys will be completed within a ten calendar-day period to minimize variation in survey results caused by differences in survey timing. If the peak blooming period varies dramatically between pools of different depths, the survey will be divided into an early and a late round, subject to approval by the City.

Parameters recorded at each pool included:
• estimated absolute vegetative cover (the percent of the pool’s area that is covered in vegetation); • dominant species present (dominant species were those with 25% relative cover or greater within a pool, or 10% if no species meets the 25% threshold; relative cover is defined as the percent of the total vegetative cover that is made up by a species or group of species); • estimated total relative cover of vernal pool indicator and vernal pool associate species (VPI/VPA) (as listed in the California Vernal Pool Assessment Preliminary Report, CDFG 1998); • overall vegetation phenology (early bloom, peak bloom, late bloom, or dead/dry); • a list of all species present.

Floristic data will be analyzed in two ways: by preserve, and by created versus preserved pools. The following measures will be calculated for 1) the total sample, 2) each of the 15 preserves, 3) all of the created pools, and 4) all of the preserved pools:
• Average species richness (total number of plant species) per pool; • Average native species richness (total number of native plant species) per pool; • Average percent of species per pool that were native; • Average percent of species per pool that were VPI/VPA; • Average percent of species per pool that were wetland indicators in this region (obligate, facultative wet, or facultative, from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service wetland indicator status website (http://plants.usda.gov/core/wetlandSearch); • Average estimated relative cover per pool of VPI/VPA species; • Average percent of dominant species that were VPI/VPA; • Percent of pools where at least 80% of dominant species were VPI/VPA.

All VNLC biologists are trained and experienced in visually estimating percent vegetation cover accurately, and will take great care to maintain consistency across surveyors and across survey years.

As in Subtask 2a, surveyors will each use a Trimble GeoXT for navigation and to map special-status species and notable features or site conditions. Survey data will be recorded digitally or on paper datasheets provided in the Plan. All data will be converted and stored electronically within a Microsoft Access database. Representative photographs will be taken, to be included in reports. 2b-2. Dry Season Hydrology Monitoring
Dry season hydrology monitoring will be conducted concurrently with the vernal pool floristic survey. The purpose of this task, as described in the Plan, is to determine whether any pools are “too wet.” Biologists Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 364 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 14 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting will measure maximum current ponding depth and will estimate the percent area of inundation for any sampled pools holding water. During the floristic survey, large and/or deep pools may naturally and appropriately hold some water, and surveyors will assess and document whether that is the case. Otherwise they will document potential artificial causes for late ponding, such as landscaping runoff, man-made features inhibiting drainage, etc.

Subtask 2c. Biological Inspection Survey
Biological Inspections will take place three times during each survey year: once during Task 2a (Wet Season Vernal Pool Survey), once during Task 2b (Dry Season Vernal Pool Survey), and once as a separate comprehensive survey after the floristic surveys are complete. The summer surveys will include all preserves, but will especially target habitats within the preserves that do not contain vernal pools. These include non vernal pool wetlands, riparian, and oak woodland/savannah habitats.

Surveyors will walk meandering transects through each preserve, ensuring that all pertinent features are observed. Surveyors will each use a Trimble GeoXT (with preserve boundaries loaded into the background) for navigation and mapping of notable site conditions. They will record notes on dominant overstory and understory species, current hydrological conditions (such as whether drainages have flowing or standing water), excessive thatch buildup, and other basic parameters requested by the City or outlined on the Preserve Inspection Sheet attached to the Plan. They will record notes on and map any instances of vandalism, garbage dumping, fencing or signage in need of repair, or other damage to infrastructure, and will document any sites that appear to be in need of restoration or enhancement activities.

During the Biological Inspection, biologists will survey for and document occurrences of non-native invasive plants. Surveys for the seven targeted invasive weed species are described below in Subtask 2e.

Surveyors will also map isolated occurrences of other invasive species using the point feature on the GPS unit, and notes will be taken on approximate population size and potential for population spread. Invasive species that are present in large numbers and population sizes throughout most preserves will not be mapped due to time and funding constraints. Instead, notes on their presence and intensity of infestation will be taken for each preserve.

Subtask 2d. Upland Vegetation Survey
Upland vegetation monitoring will take place within the same ten preserves as monitored in past years. Ten preserves were originally selected in 2014 during the first year of upland vegetation monitoring, and one preserve was swapped out in 2019. To select the monitored preserves, they were separated into grazed and ungrazed categories, and then selected randomly so that at least one preserve in the sample remained ungrazed.

The upland vegetation surveys will be conducted in mid-spring during peak bloom of grassland species. If the timing of peak bloom coincides, the upland vegetation surveys will be conducted concurrently with vernal pool floristics surveys, to increase survey efficiency. Monitoring will take place along the same transects established in the 2014 survey. These transects measure 100 meters in length, and start at random points along a baseline transect and run perpendicular to the baseline out into the preserve.

In 2020, VNLC worked with the City to update the upland vegetation survey methodology in order to provide the most objective and accurate data on plant species composition, thatch accumulation, and abiotic cover possible, while maintaining the same analysis methodology and outputs as in previous years (to continue to allow for comparison between years). These updated methods are as follows. Each year, vegetation data will be collected using a combination of point-intercept and quadrat methodology. In the point-intercept method, the surveyor will note the plant taxa to the lowest justifiable taxon, thatch, or abiotic Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 365 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 15 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting cover first encountered on the top-down point intercept located every meter along each transect. This methodology provides a more objective calculation of vegetation cover than the visual estimates utilized in previous years. With the point-intercept method, we will collect data at 300 points within each preserve. In order to capture low cover plants in a species richness metric, three 35 cm x 70 cm quadrats will be systematically placed along each of the three transects (for a total of nine quadrats per preserve) and all plant species will be noted within the quadrats. Finally, the depth of thatch will be noted at a single point in the center (or three separate points and averaged, if depth varies widely) of each quadrat. Finally, a photo will be taken at the start of each transect looking out into the upland habitat and any qualitative observations related to grazing will be recorded.

Upland vegetation data will be analyzed by the following metrics:
• Total and native species richness per quadrat, per preserve; • Percent native species per quadrat, per preserve;
• Average relative cover of native species;
• Average thatch cover; and
• Average thatch depth.

All data will be collected using Apple iPads and ArcGIS Field Maps or Survey123 software, and stored electronically within a Microsoft Access database. Additional preserves may be added if budget allows, if agreed upon with the City.

Subtask 2e. Invasive Weed Survey
In addition to the more general upland vegetation monitoring described above, targeted weed monitoring will occur for seven problem species: medusahead (Elymus caput-medusae), Italian thistle (Carduus pycnocephalus), yellow star-thistle (Centaurea solstitialis), mustard (Brassica nigra or Hirschfeldia incana), stinkwort (Dittrichia graveolens), skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea), and barbed goatgrass (Aegilops triuncialis). Additional targeted weeds may be added to the survey as new problematic species become established over time. VNLC biologists will map each occurrence that has a minimum of 50% absolute vegetative cover using Trimble GPS units and will estimate the size and percent cover of each weed point.

The Invasive Weed Survey will take place in the summer, concurrently with the Biological Inspections. All data will be recorded electronically within a survey-specific data dictionary loaded on a Trimble GPS unit or ArcGIS Field Maps or Survey123 software, and stored electronically within an Excel database.

Subtask 2f. Residual Dry Matter Survey
Residual dry matter monitoring will take place in late fall prior to germinating rain events, ideally after grazing is complete, within the same 15 preserves surveyed in 2019. Ten of the 15 preserves were randomly selected for RDM monitoring in 2014, and five were added to the survey in 2018 to help provide a more thorough understanding of the effects of the goat grazing program. More preserves may be added in the future, if budget allows and is agreed upon with the City.

In 2020, VNLC worked with the City to update the RDM survey methodology in order to provide the most objective and accurate data possible. RDM levels will be assessed within the preserves using a grid method, as opposed to the transect method employed in past years. Biologists will collect RDM data within 10 plots (circular 0.1 m2 hoops) per preserve, placed in a grid-like fashion across the grassland. These grids will remain the same each year, to allow for precise year to year comparison. Biologists will visually estimate RDM levels and bare ground in each plot, but will clip and weigh the first plot and every fourth plot Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 366 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 16 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting thereafter for calibration of visual estimates. A subset of clipped material will be brought to the office and further air dried and weighed to estimate moisture content and adjust the measurements if necessary.

Biologists will navigate to RDM plots and collect data electronically with Trimble GPS units. Plot locations will be adjusted to avoid non-range vegetation, wetlands, boundaries, and disturbance by at least 2 meters.

TASK 3. REPORT PREPARATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Subtask 3a. Draft and Final Monitoring Reports
A thorough yet concise annual draft monitoring report will be submitted to the City that details the methods and results of monitoring surveys, and discusses specific management recommendations. The report will cover overall site conditions by Habitat Management Unit (i.e., vernal pool grassland, riparian/wetland, and oak woodland/savannah) as well as specific features mapped and documented during field surveys. It will also include an analysis and summary of all monitoring parameters measured during field surveys (e.g. number and percent of pools meeting the 80% vernal pool dominants threshold, and specific instances and analyses of pools not meeting the threshold). Monitoring parameters for each survey will be compared to baseline data to allow for tracking of trends within each preserve. Summary tables and figures will be included to clearly highlight important findings. The report will include representative photographs, a set of appropriately scaled color maps with all notable featuresshown, and electronic copies of field data sheets.

After review by the City, we will incorporate the City’s changes into the final monitoring report.

If needed, this task may also include a draft and final USFWS 90-day report, which will be prepared according to the requirements outlined in the Interim Survey Guidelines to Permittees for Recovery Permits under Section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act for Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods. However, in recent years, USFWS has requested that 90-day report data be compiled only in the Annual Monitoring Report, rather than within a separate 90-day report.

Subtask 3b. Agency Issues
We will coordinate and submit the Annual Monitoring Report to the appropriate agency contacts. This report will provide the information required under the various permit and mitigation agreements associated with each Preserve and stipulated in the Plan. We will be available to coordinate with the Agencies as requested by the City.

TASK 4. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT SURVEYS AND REPORTING Subtask 4a. Special-status Species Habitat Surveys
A Designated Biologist (or Department-approved biological monitor) is required to conduct special-status species habitat mapping on any jurisdictional creek where routine maintenance work will be performed.

This mapping expires after two years. The City has broken the jurisdictional streams into 1000-foot segments for ease of reporting. Two VNLC biologists will conduct the habitat mapping by walking both sides (where possible) of each requested stream segment and documenting potential habitat for specialstatus species with potential to occur in the area, such as: western spadefoot (Spea hammondii), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata), and California black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus). Biologists will map specialstatus species habitat using Trimble GPS units or remotely using aerial imagery if necessary.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 367 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 17 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting Subtask 4b. Nesting Bird Surveys
A Designated Biologist is required to conduct a nesting bird survey within 5 days of the start of any maintenance work occurring between February 1 and August 31 within jurisdictional creeks and riparian areas in Roseville. Focused surveys for nesting birds will be conducted by two VNLC biologists. The biologists will traverse the requested stream segments on foot, checking the ground, shrubs, trees, and any structures (e.g., bridges, buildings, culverts) for nests. Where possible, the biologists will also survey within a 500-foot radius of the work area for burrowing owl. The biologists will spend time watching surrounding bird activity for any signs of nesting behavior, such as carrying food or nesting material. Active nests will be documented using a Trimble GPS unit.

Subtask 4c. RMA Report Preparation
Results of both special-status species surveys and nesting bird surveys will be compiled into concise reports and submitted to the City as soon as possible following survey completion (usually within 24-48 hours).

Reports for habitat surveys will include maps delineating any special-status species habitat within the surveyed segments and representative photos; reports for nesting bird surveys will include maps showing any identified active nests, and avoidance recommendations if necessary.

Subtask 4d. Annual Special Status Species Awareness Training We will conduct the Annual Special Status Species Awareness Education for City staff. The annual training will include the following: biology of habitats and special-status species present in the area, legal protection for these species, penalties for violations and protection measures, overview of current invasive species present or potentially present in the project area, and a discussion of best management practices to be implemented. We will also develop and distribute fact sheets which summarize this information for staff.

TASK 5. ON-CALL CONSULTATION SERVICES
VNLC staff will be available on an on-call basis to provide various consulting services. These services may include issues with land dedication, construction impacts, internal permitting projects, and various nesting surveys. Under this task, VNLC will also provide training for City staff on various topics as desired by City staff. Examples of such trainings may include: fairy shrimp biology, vernal pool spring botany tours, or onsite or off-site preserve educational tours.

Other sample activities that could be covered under this task include:
• Providing comprehensive wetland mapping to update the City’s GIS geodatabase; • Assistance with improvements to the goat grazing program; • Assistance with preparation of educational signage to be posted in certain preserves to educate the public; or
• Assistance with preparation of educational pamphlets to discourage adjacent landowners whose backyards are expanding onto the preserve lands.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 368 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 18 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting

OPTIONAL TASKS

1. Wet Season 20% Vernal Pool Survey – 2 Rounds
This optional task would replace the above Subtask 2a, and would increase the wet season surveys described above from 10% to 20% of all vernal pools. All survey methods would remain the same.

2. Dry Season 20% Vernal Pool Survey
This optional task would replace the above Subtask 2b, and would increase the dry season surveys described above from 10% to 20% of all vernal pools. All survey methods would remain the same.

3. Ground Nesting Surveys
Surveys for ground nesting birds will be conducted prior to mowing of fire breaks in late spring. VNLC will obtain maps or detailed descriptions of fire break locations from the City. Surveyors will walk the entire length of planned fire breaks and will map any occurrences of ground nests or owl burrows using the point feature on the GPS unit. Notes will be made on the status and condition of the nest or burrow, including evidence of current usage. In previous years these surveys have been conducted in conjunction with other upland surveys when needed by the City. We have included a small budget for any additional hours that may be needed outside of those surveys.

4. Invasive Species Management Plan
A draft Invasive Species Management Plan has been submitted to the City as of the end of VNLC’s last contract (2024). This plan includes descriptions and control methods for each of the invasive plants present within the riparian habitats in Roseville, and those with potential to occur. The plan also includes best management practices to prevent the spread or introduction of each species, and a response plan in the event of a new introduction or rapid spread of a species. Therefore, this task includes budget for updates and finalization of the Invasive Species Management Plan, as desired by City staff.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 369 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 19 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting F. Cost Proposal

PROPOSED BUDGET AND FEE SCHEDULE
The proposed cost estimate for completing the first year of required monitoring and reporting is $193,405.

This total includes all project expenses. Table 3, below, shows the hourly rate for on-call consulting services. Hourly rates are raised $3.00 every two years. Table 4 provides a breakdown of these costs by the tasks outlined above. None of the optional surveys are included in this budget. Optional surveys would add the following costs to the total budget:

1. $20,050 to increase wet season vernal pool monitoring to 20% of pools

2. $20,050 to increase dry season vernal pool monitoring to 20% of pools

3. $2,000 to conduct ground nesting surveys in fire breaks

4. $1,000 for Invasive Species Management Plan updates

ASSUMPTIONS
The following assumptions were made in developing the scope and budget:

1. All tasks will be billed on a time and materials, not-to-exceed basis.

2. The budget assumes approximately 173 pools will be monitored each year; surveys on more than 200 pools may require additional funds.

3. There will be no major problems accessing any portions of the survey areas on foot or by vehicle, when allowed.

4. The Task 4 (Routine Maintenance Agreement Surveys) budget assumes that habitat surveys will be performed on a maximum of 150-175 segments per year, and nesting surveys will be performed on a maximum 120-140 segments (80% of 150-175 segments).

5. Task 5 (On-call Services) includes a not-to-exceed amount of $19,510. Activities performed under this task will be conducted only as requested and in consultation with the City.

Table 3: Hourly Rates for On-call Consulting Services
Year Principal-in-Charge
Hourly Rate
Project Manager
Hourly Rate
Field Biologist/GIS Specialist
Hourly Rate
2025-2026 $195 $145 $115
2027-2028 $198 $148 $118
2029-2030 $201 $151 $121
Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 370 of 1281 ends

Table 4. Budget for completing Tasks 1 through 5 for the 2025-2026 monitoring contract within the City of Roseville's 36 preserves. Reason Farms is surveyed in even years only.

LABOR (hours) Task 1 Task 2a Task 2b Task 2c Task 2d Task 2e Task 2f Task 2 Total Task 3a Task 3b Task 3 Total Task 4a Task 4b Task 4c Task 4d Task 4 Total Task 5 TOTAL Field
Prep
Wet
Season
VP Survey
Dry
Season
VP
Survey
Biological
Inspection
Upland
Veg
Survey
Invasives
Survey
RDM
Survey
Field
Surveys
Draft/Final
Monitoring
Report
Agency
Issues
Preserve
Reporting
Habitat
Surveys
Nesting
Bird
Surveys
RMA
Reporting
Annual
Species
Training
RMA
Surveys/
Reporting
On-call
Services Total
Principal in Charge 4 2 2 2 200 8 46 10 000 0 0 8 22
Project Manager 24 4 4 4 421 19 50 16 66 0 0 24 2 26 40 135 GIS Specialist 20 4 4 4 400 16 40 4 44 10 8 40 2 60 30 140 Senior Field Biologists 60 198 198 154 100 30 60 740 110 0 110 112 92 0 4 208 60 1118TOTAL LABOR HOURS 108 208 208 164 110 32 61 783 204 26 230 122 100 64 8 294 138 1415LABOR (cost) Rate/Hr. Task 1 Subtask 2a Subtask 2b Subtask 2dSubtask 2dSubtask 2eSubtask 2f Task 2 Total Subtask 3a Subtask 3b Task 3 Total Subtask 4aSubtask 4b Subtask 4c Subtask 4d Task 4 Total Task 5 TOTAL Principal in Charge $195 $780 $390 $390 $390 $390 $0 $0 $1,560 $780 $1,170 $1,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,560 $4,290 Project Manager $145 $3,480 $580 $580 $580 $580 $290 $145 $2,755 $7,250 $2,320 $9,570 $0 $0 $3,480 $290 $3,480 $5,800 $19,285 GIS Specialist $115 $2,300 $460 $460 $460 $460 $0 $0 $1,840 $4,600 $460 $5,060 $1,150 $920 $4,600 $230 $6,670 $3,450 $15,870 Senior Field Biologists $115 $6,900 $22,770 $22,770 $17,710 $11,500 $3,450 $6,900 $85,100 $12,650 $0 $12,650 $12,880 $10,580 $0 $460 $23,460 $6,900 $128,110 TOTAL LABOR COST $13,460 $24,200 $24,200 $19,140 $12,930 $3,740 $7,045 $91,255 $25,280 $3,950 $29,230 $14,030 $11,500 $8,080 $980 $34,590 $17,710 $186,245 OTHER DIRECT COSTS Task 1 Task 2 Total Task 3 Total Task 4 Total Task 5 TOTALVehicle Mileage ($0.70/ mi.) $0 $3,560 $0 $1,800 $1,800 $5,360 TOTAL ODCs $0 $3,560 $0 $1,800 $1,800 $7,160 TOTAL PROJECT COST $13,460 $24,200 $24,200 $19,140 $12,930 $3,740 $7,045 $94,815 $25,280 $3,950 $29,230 $14,030 $11,500 $8,080 $980 $36,390 $19,510 $193,405 2025-2026
Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 371 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 21 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting G. Required Statements/Documents

1. ASSURANCE OF DESIGNATED PROJECT TEAM
VNLC assures that the designated project team (listed above) will be used for this project. Departure or reassignment of, or substitution for, any member of the designated project team shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City.

2. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
To our knowledge there are no actual, apparent, direct or indirect, or potential conflicts of interest that exist with respect to our firm, management or employees, or other persons relative to the services to be provided under the Agreement for services to be awarded pursuant to this RFP.

3. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE COVERAGE
VNLC carries all of the types and levels of insurance that will be required by the City for this contract. The insurance we carry includes General Liability Insurance, Professional Liability Insurance, Worker’s Compensation Insurance, and Automobile Liability Insurance. We will provide a certificate of insurance to the City during contracting that will name the City as an additional insured as requested. VNLC agrees to fulfill the indemnification requirements outlined in the sample contract submitted with the RFP.

4. STATEMENT OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
No proprietary information is contained within this proposal package; all information contained within this proposal shall become property of the City.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 372 of 1281 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962

Page 373 of 1281 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 374 of 1281 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 375 of 1281 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 376 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal 26 June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting H. Exceptions
No exceptions to the requirements of the RFP are suggested at this time. Any changes to the proposed tasks and scope of work would be made by VNLC at the request of the City and additional funding would need to be allocated accordingly if the changes a significant expansion of the current scope of work.

I. Competency of Proposers
VNLC has not had or been involved in any bankruptcies, liens, stop payment notices, judgments, lawsuits, foreclosures, or any similar actions filed or resolved in the past seven (7) years except one. One of our senior employees was terminated for poor performance in 2021 and we ended up settling a dispute she filed with the Employment Development Department for improper termination. VNLC has not been terminated by any clients for breach of contract.

John Vollmar, president and CEO of Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting, Inc. warrants that the company has been since its founding (in 1996) and continues through the present to be financially solvent and maintains adequate financial resources in the form of savings and available lines of credit to maintain a staff of regular employees adequate to ensure continuous performance of work. Mr. Vollmar further warrants that the company maintains the equipment required to complete the contemplated work including computers, printers, GIS and other software, professional GPS units, and any other needed field equipment.

The maintenance of adequate financial and equipment resources by the company has been demonstrated to the City during the past 15 years the company conducted monitoring of the City’s preserves.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 377 of 1281 ends

Biological Monitoring Proposal June 2025
City of Roseville Preserve Open Space Areas Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting

APPENDIX A
VNLC Grazing Memo 2021
Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 378 of 1281 ends

SF BAY AREA OFFICE
1720 Solano Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94707
Phone: 510/559-9603
www.vollmarconsulting.com

MEMORANDUM
To: Eric Dubovik and Eric Dexter, City of Roseville
From: Linnea Neuhaus and Denise Defreese, VNLC
Subject: Ideas to improve grazing efficiency and reduce grazing costs within the City of Roseville Open Space Preserves
Date: 3/22/21
No. Pages: 5
(including a map)
This memo provides a summary and discussion of ideas for how to improve grazing efficiency and reduce grazing costs to the City of Roseville (City), following the Zoom meeting between Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting (VNLC) and the City on January 26, 2021. During our meeting, we discussed ideas such as introducing sheep into the grazing program and forming relationships with local goat or sheep grazers who may be interested in either paying to graze the larger preserves, or grazing at no cost to the City. Below is a summary and discussion of some of our current ideas.

Example Preserve: Woodcreek East (Preserve 9)
Woodcreek East (Preserve 9) has been suggested as a test candidate for sheep or cattle grazing by VNLC and City staff in past years. In October 2020, VNLC’s Denise Defreese, State of California Certified Rangeland Manager #M106, conducted Residual Dry Matter (RDM) sampling and a general inspection of rangeland conditions within Woodcreek East, to assess the feasibility of introducing sheep or cattle to the preserve for either several months at a time or year-round.

Woodcreek East is approximately 77 acres with over half consisting of soil type Alamo-Fiddyment complex (0 to 5 percent slopes), a soil found at elevations of 50 to 130 feet described as having slow permeability (see Figure 1). Habitat consists of vernal pools, grassland, oak savannah, and riparian woodland.

Woodcreek East has vernal pools and seasonal wetlands throughout, and some heavily incised six-footdeep ephemeral swale drainages that run diagonally through the preserve. The northern boundary is privately owned (except for one industrial property) and consists of open grasslands that have been grazed in the past. It has a barbed wire fence boundary in good condition; the industrial site has a chain link fence.

The western boundary is the Woodcreek Oaks subdivision with associated subdivision style fencing. The eastern boundary is light industry or private undeveloped grassland property. The light industrial areas have chain link fence and the private properties had remnants of what was formerly barbed wire fence. Except for a 7.5-acre portion south of the Pleasant Grove Creek Trail, most of the southern boundary is delineated by North Branch of Pleasant Grove Creek, an undulating year-round stream that still had deep pools in October, and the Pleasant Grove Creek Trail, a paved multi-use trail that runs east-west between Woodcreek Oaks Blvd and Foothills Blvd in Roseville. The southern boundary has no fence lines.

RDM samples were taken at ten plots throughout the preserve and ranged from 600 to 2400 pounds per acre. Three of the ten sites (and most of the northeast portion) had burned in the past few months. The area had not been grazed at the time of the survey and grass height ranged from less than 6 inches in unproductive soil areas to over 14 inches in the productive alluvial areas adjacent to the drainages or stream. Medusa head (Elymus caput-medusae), a California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) High rated species was found at six of the seven sites sampled that were not burned. Yellow star thistle (Centaurea solstitialis), Cal-IPC High rated, was observed throughout the preserve.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 379 of 1281 ends

The Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan (OSPOMP) Section 7.3.2 points out that grazing with cattle requires large contiguous areas to support a herd to make it economically feasible for a beef producer (ECORP Consulting 2011a). A nearby rancher may be willing to use a smaller property if they own or lease next door or close enough to easily move the cattle to the City’s preserve. A barbed wire fence or other lawful fence sufficient to contain the livestock is required for a cattle field. Generally, this is noted as a five-strand barbed wire fence. Producers also need water for the stock, an area to put up temporary holding pens and/or access for a vehicle to transport the stock in and out. We estimate that the fence line needed to fence Woodcreek East for a cattle pasture is about 8,000 feet at $6/foot, totaling $48,000. This fencing estimate excludes the portion of Woodcreek East (7.5 acres) and the adjacent portions of Roseville Technology Park (Preserve 5; also 7.5 acres) which extend south of the creek and the trail. Fencing such a small area (approximately 15 acres) and adding gates across the trail would be prohibitively expensive and aggravating to trail users, so the area was withdrawn from the proposed fence area. The fencing along the subdivision may be substantial enough to contain the cattle, but neighbors who have not previously lived next to cattle grazed areas will likely complain about cattle activity along their fences (e.g. cattle rubbing on the fences), so it’s likely that nearly the entire field would need fencing. The field would also need water, but if a rancher has the property lease adjacent, then additional water may not be necessary. Cattle will travel up to one mile for water if topography is less than 5% slope. Using the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) web soil survey, we calculated a total Animal Unit Month (AUM) to be 67 during a normal precipitation year. This means the field might support five cows or cow calf pairs over the course of the year. If they were only in the pasture for six months or half the time it would support 10; for three months it would support 20.

Sheep, as smaller animals, are the equivalent of 0.2 of an animal unit. Woodcreek East would support about 110 head of sheep for three months, 55 for six months or about 27 head year-round using the same NRCS soil survey for an average precipitation year. These numbers could be slightly higher if sheep could be herded and penned in the 15-acre portion south of the trail (which is likely not feasible for cattle). Sheep do not require the same fencing as cattle. If using standard barbed wire, sheep producers install a bottom layer of field fence to keep the small animals from escaping in permanent enclosures. Many sheep producers only use electric fence netting that they install (similar to what goat grazers use), and they periodically move the stock by simply moving the fence to the next area they want grazed. If they grazed Woodcreek East, they would install electric fence around the 15-acre portion and then move across the trail and creek to graze the remaining 70 acres. Sheep need water as well, and many producers haul water tanks to provide water necessary for the herd. Similar to goat grazers, some sheep producers have herders on site 24 hours per day, who stay in portable housing trailers parked nearby; others may simply check the stock daily if they live or work nearby. Many producers use guard dogs for predator protection especially if the sheep are left alone for periods of time. Predators include coyotes, mountain lions, and unsupervised domestic dogs that can pack together and kill numerous stock.

Summary of cattle requirements
Barbed wire fencing around the preserve; water development, water hauling, or access to water (10-20 gallons per cow per day, dependent upon ambient temperature and forage vegetation moisture) within one mile; vehicle access for transport of livestock in and out; and stock care and holding pens if not managed with next door property. The size of Woodcreek East and the low number of cattle animal units it will support make the site economically infeasible given the capital infrastructure costs for fencing alone.

Summary of sheep or goat requirements
Producer or contractor brings and installs electric fence for stock containment and water tanks for the troughs (1-2 gallons water per day per goat or sheep); herds often have an onsite shepherd and/or a guard dog for predator protection. Electric fence allows the flexibility of specific management of areas so the livestock can be used for specific management goals if agreed upon with the producer.

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 380 of 1281 ends

Match.graze Online Platform
Match.graze is a free online platform recently established but expanding across California that connects livestock producers and public and private landowners for targeted grazing, neighborhood grazing, and traditional fee based grazing leases. Given that current goat grazing is unable to be completed until October or later on the preserve each year, adding an additional goat contractor or finding a new sheep producer willing to graze the preserve at a neutral or discounted fee may be an option to consider. Although Woodcreek East is relatively small, local sheep producers may be interested if offered access or license for several preserves. This type of agreement would allow the City to meet the Grazing Plan goals of fuels reduction, thatch reduction, and weedy species reduction, and potentially gain income or reduce existing costs (ECORP Consulting 2011b).

Additional Options
Below are additional options the City might consider for improving the overall grazing program.

1. Update new goat contract language to include general completion due dates for specific areas, ideally done in conjunction with the local fire agencies, so the most fire prone areas are completed first. Due dates can be staggered so first properties are completed by May 15, June 15, and July 15, for example. Dates can be determined by the needs of the property for fuels management, weed management, or other resource management objectives.

If the existing contractor is unable to meet the due dates for the preserve properties, the City could open a Request for Proposal for contract bids to graze on the properties remaining and select an additional (or new) contractor or two contractors if necessary.

2. Consider a review of all the preserves to determine which might be better maintained using a targeted grazing service contract and which would be suitable for a long-term contract with a sheep producer. Generally, the more difficult properties (those that are small, have difficult access, or require significant livestock movement and effort) will likely require targeted grazing. Targeted grazing is typically described as a project to be done at a specific time, in a specific area and to meet a specific goal; those projects usually are contracted for a fee to the contractor.

3. Long-term or even temporary short-term licenses for grazing use on the preserves might be feasible if enough larger preserve properties were cobbled together. Consider some of the larger areas (especially any near each other) for a sheep producer. Sheep producers can be found through the Match.graze platform mentioned above or through general inquiries with the local woolgrower’s association and may be interested in a fee neutral or fee-based license if enough larger preserve properties were cobbled together. Grazing licenses often have similar goals as targeted grazing such as fuels abatement or weed control, but there is more flexibility. For example, the producer can use the area between November and June (the growing season) but must leave RDM of a minimum 300 pounds per acre in fields with slopes less than 10% in September. Combining some of the larger preserve properties with the Reason Farms 228-acre preserve, should it be available, could make an enticing sheep grazing license. Reason Farms is approved for grazing between November and June according to the Operations and Management Plan. Producers use grazing license flexibility to move livestock around to meet the needs of the resource in agreement with the land manager.

They might use an area like Reason Farms early in the season and move into other preserve fields as the season progressed depending on water availability, forage production, plans for impacting Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 381 of 1281 ends

weedy species, or even recreational use that might impact their herds. There are immense variabilities but if goals are discussed and agreed upon in advance and communication is open between producer and land manager, the land gets managed appropriately, weeds are better controlled, and fuels abatement goals are met.

All the options can be discussed in detail with VNLC staff to offer needed guidance including potential license language or contract language changes.

References

ECORP Consulting. 2011a. Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan, Administrative Draft.

ECORP Consulting. 2011b. City of Roseville Open Space Preserve Interim Grazing Plan, Appendix 25.

Match.graze. 2020. Query for information https://matchgraze.com/about. Accessed Nov. 2020 Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey. 2020. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm. Accessed Oct. 2020 Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 382 of 1281 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 86ED9EAA-E058-4EC4-A32F-C0962FE89EEA

Page 383 of 1281 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 8/20/2025
Item #: VII.7
File #: 0704-01 & 0203-21
Item ID: 2025-533
Title: Woodbridge Park Tennis & Pickleball Court Renovation Project - Reject all Bids and Authorize Staff to Call for New Bids
Contact: Josh Cervantes 916-746-1233 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends the rejection of all bids, and authorize staff to call for new bids for the Woodbridge Park Tennis & Pickleball Court Renovation Project. The Woodbridge Park Tennis & Pickleball Court Renovation Project includes Tennis/Pickleball Court surface and accessibility improvements. Additional landscape and Tennis/Pickleball Court improvements will be included as funding allows. Funding for this Project was approved in the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Capital Project Fund through the FY2024-25 budget process.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to reject all bids and authorize staff to call for new bids for the Woodbridge Park Tennis & Pickleball Court Renovation Project.

BACKGROUND
Location and Size
This project is located at Woodbridge Park, a 7.2-acre neighborhood park located at 415 Sierra Blvd in Roseville, California. This park features a variety of recreational amenities, including a covered picnic area, playgrounds, a half basketball court, two bocce ball courts, two tennis courts, and restrooms. The foundation of the park’s existing tennis courts, which included a striping overlay for pickleball, have aged significantly and are due for renovation. The scope of work for this project includes renovating the court foundation, re-establishing one of the two tennis courts, maintaining the pickleball striping overlay on the tennis courts and converting the second tennis court into two pickleball only courts and adding a new shaded seating area for the pickleball courts.

The base bid includes replacing the foundation slab, installing new striping and equipment, color-coat resurfacing the court area, upgrading entrances to ensure ADA compliance, adding new benches, and the installation of a new shaded seating area. Add alternatives are included for installation of protective windscreens around the perimeter of the existing tennis/pickleball court, and for the removal and installation of new bark mulch and noise reducing fabric along the tennis/pickleball frontage along Mariposa Street, as funding allows.

Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to bid the project at the March 2025 meeting. This first bid resulted in a rejection of all bids and an authorization to re-bid at the May 21, 2025 meeting.

Bid Summary
The project was re-bid in June, 2025 with bids opened on July 1st, 2025. The bid results and engineers'

Page 384 of 1281 ends

estimate are as follows:

Bidder: Total Lump Sum Bid:

B+M Civil LLC. $257,280.00
Saenz Landscape Construction Co $274,910.00
Swierstok Enterprise Inc dva Pro Builders. $364,000.00
Engineers Estimate $270,000.00
After thorough review, the two lowest bids received were deemed as unresponsive, while the third bid came in over budget. Therefore, staff recommend the rejection of all bids.

No changes to the plans or specifications have occurred since the original plan approval in March because the bids, when considering costs only, are coming in within budget.

Schedule
In consideration of the weather, staff will seek to re-bid the project in late winter 2025 with a spring 2026 construction date. Should the City receive competitive bids, staff plans to return to Council at that time to seek approval to award the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The base bid scope of work is estimated at $270,000. Funding for this Project was approved in the Parks Recreation & Libraries Capital Project Fund through the FY2024-25 budget process.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the minor alterations of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required. The project would improve the existing tennis court and add a new tennis court and two new pickleball courts at Woodbridge Park. This would not result in expansion of use beyond existing levels. Furthermore, no environmentally sensitive resources are located within the project sites; therefore, the Class 1 Exemption is applicable to the proposed project.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

5. Support community engagement and advocacy

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Josh Cervantes, Park Development Project Manager
Jill Geller, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-274

2. Vicinity Map

3. Project Plans - For Bid Only

Page 385 of 1281 ends

4. Project Manual - For Bid Only

5. CEQA Notice of Exemption
REVIEWERS:

Josh Cervantes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development
Created/Initiated -
7/23/2025
Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 7/23/2025 Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 7/25/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/29/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 8/4/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/7/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/7/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/8/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 8/11/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/11/2025

Page 386 of 1281 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-274

REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR THE WOODBRIDGE PARK TENNIS & PICKLEBALL

COURT RENOVATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Roseville requested bids for the Woodbridge Park Tennis & Pickleball Court Renovation Project located at 415 Sierra Blvd. in Roseville, CA; and WHEREAS, after a thorough review, the two lowest bids received were deemed as unresponsive and the remaining bids came in over budget; and WHEREAS, staff wishes to reject all bids with plans to call for new bids in December 2025.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that all bids received for the Woodbridge Park Tennis & Pickleball Court Renovation project are hereby rejected per staff recommendation.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk

Page 387 of 1281 ends

Woodbridge Park
Vicinity Map

Page 388 of 1281 ends

PRESENTATION: DESIGN: VERIFICATION: DRAWING: R E V I S I O N E S N° DATE 415 SIERRA BLVD, ROSEVILLE, CA, 95678 CONSULTANT: APPROVED : SHEET: OF COVER PAGE JOSHUA RAUL CERVANTES SCALE: DATE: C0 WOODBRIDGE TENNIS / PICKLEBALL COURT IMPROVEMENTS WOODBRIDGE TENNIS & PICKLEBALL COURT RENOVATION PROJECT 415 SIERRA BLVD. ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, 95678 GENERAL NOTES: 1. LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS LATEST EDITION. IMPROVEMENTS ARE ALSO TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS LATEST EDITION, WHERE APPLICABLE. ALL WORK SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION BY CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CA. 2. DESIGN: THE DRAWINGS HEREIN REPRESENT A GENERAL DESIGN TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THE SITE DEPICTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE CITY TO CLARIFY PLAN DETAILS RELATED TO SITE OR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS RELATED TO THE SITE OR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS NECESSARY FOR PROJECT COMPLETION. 3. COORDINATION: CONTRACTORS SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING WITH THAT OF CITY'S REPRESENTATIVE AND OTHER CONTRACTORS EFFICIENTLY AND IN A TIMELY MANNER, ENSURING THE PROJECT COMPLETION IS UNIMPEDED AND INSTALLED CORRECTLY. THE CITY REPRESENTATIVE TO BE CONTACTED DIRECTLY AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS (48 HOURS) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. 4. BIDDING INFORMATION: SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, SPECIAL PROVISIONS, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO BIDDING INFORMATION AND SITE VISITS PRIOR TO BID SUBMITTAL. 5. SITE CONDITIONS: SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO SITE CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR TO EXAMINE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF SITE. IN THE EVENT THAT ON-SITE CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM CONDITIONS DEPICTED ON PLANS AND WILL IMPACT THE INSTALLATION PROCESS, THE CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT THESE FINDINGS TO THE CITY IN WRITING PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. COMMENCEMENT OF WORK IMPLIES ACCEPTANCE OF THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS.SHOWN HEREIN ARE SUPERIMPOSED OVER DATA PROVIDED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHER SOURCES. THE CITY OF MODESTO SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE CHANGES, INACCURACIES, OMISSIONS, OR OTHER ERRORS RELATED TO THIS DATA. THE BASE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS AN AID ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING ALL DOCUMENTS AND ACCOMMODATING ANY DISCREPANCIES. 6. BASE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: CITY OF ROSEVILLE 316 VERNON STREET ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 PHONE: (916) 772-7529 7. UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM RECORD INFORMATION. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) TO DETERMINE, IN THE FIELD, THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT AND USE EXTREME CAUTION WHEN EXPOSING AND/OR WORKING NEAR EXISTING UTILITIES. 8. UTILITY COMPANIES ARE MEMBERS OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) ON-CALL PROGRAM. THE CONTRACTOR AND ANY SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT U.S.A. AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS (48 HOURS) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. ONLY EXCAVATIONS WILL REVEAL ACTUAL TYPES, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND DEPTHS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE CITY OF MODESTO ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF9. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR OF BURIED EXISTING OBJECTS AND UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A CURRENT SET OF DRAWINGS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES WITH DEVIATIONS FROM ORIGINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS NOTED. UPON PROJECT COMPLETION THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE THE CITY WITH A DIGITAL FORMAT AND HARD COPY COMPLETE SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PRESERVE ALL SURFACE AND SUB-SURFACE FACILITIES WHICH MAY BE IN THE WORKING AREA. LAYOUT NOTES: 1. MANUFACTURER NAMED ITEMS ARE FOR STANDARD OF REFERENCE AND DO NOT NECESSARILY LIMIT SUPPLY TO NAMED MANUFACTURERS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXAMINE RELATED WORK AND SURFACES BEFORE STARTING WORK OF THIS SECTION AND SHOULD REPORT TO THE CITY IN WRITING ANY CONDITIONS WHICH WILL PREVENT THE PROPER PROVISION OF THIS WORK. BEGINNING THE WORK OF THIS SECTION WITHOUT REPORTING UNSUITABLE CONDITIONS CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS. ANY REQUIRED REMOVAL, REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF THIS WORK CAUSED BY UNSUITABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE DONE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 3. ALL EARTHWORK, GRADING AND SOIL DELIVERY/REMOVAL IS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR, IF APPLICABLE. 4. ALL CONCRETE FINISHES SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH CITY REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. SOIL QUANTITY: 1. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO BALANCE CUT AND FILL. CITY OF ROSEVILLE GENERAL NOTES: THIS PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROVED PLANS AND THE PARKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, LATEST EDITION. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS NEEDED TO INSTALL SCOPE OF WORK SCOPE OF WORK: SCOPE OF WORK TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING AC COURT PAVEMENT AND TENNIS & PICKLEBALL EQUIPMENT, REMOVE AND REPLACE ENTRANCE GATES AT SELECT LOCATIONS, PROVIDE AND INSTALL SHADE STRUCTURE, PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW BENCHES AT SELECT LOCATIONS, INSTALL UNDER WALK DRAIN AT SELECT LOCATIONS - REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK PLANS FOR FURTHER BREAK DOWN OF SCOPE OF WORK SHEET INDEX: 1 COVER SHEET 2 SCOPE OF WORK PLAN 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 4 DEMO PLAN 5 LAYOUT PLAN 6 GATE NOTES AND DETAILS 7 GATE AND FENCE DETAILS 8 TENNIS AND PICKLEBALL DETAILS 9 UNDER WALK DRAIN DETAILS 10 ADDITIONAL DETAILS NC SHADE STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL SHEETS VICINITY MAP: BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE: ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING MODEL CODES AND ALL APPLY TO THE MOST UP TO DATE CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN STANDARDS: 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC), WITH CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDMENTS 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC), 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC), 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC), WITH CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDMENTS 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY STANDARDS (CES), 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, WITH CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDMENTS (RFC). NOTICE TO PLAN CHECKER: PROJECT NAME: WOODBRIDGE TENNIS / PICKLEBALL COURT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PROJECT AREA: 13,600 SQUARE FEET LOCATION MAP: PROJECT LOCATION N.T.S AC ASPHALT BC BACK OF CURB BOL BOLLARD BOW BACK OF WALK CATV CABLE TV BOX CB CATCH BASIN CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE COL COLUMN C CONCRETE DI DRAINAGE INLET EB ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX EP EDGE OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FL FLOWLINE FNC FENCE-HEIGHT & TYPE NOTED FOW FACE OF WALK GRD RAIL GUARD RAIL GM GAS METER GV GAS VALVE HV VLT HIGH VOLTAGE VAULT LIP LIP OF GUTTER MS CONCRETE MOW STRIP NG NATURAL GROUND PAV PAVEMENT PB PACIFIC BELL SLB STREET LIGHT BOX SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT SSMH SANITARY SEWER MAN HOLE SW SIDEWALK TC TOP OF CURB TCDO TOP OF CURB DRIVE OVER T 22" TREE W/ 22" DIAMETER TRUNK WF WOOD FENCE-HEIGHT NOTED WM WATER METER WV WATER VALVE WVLT WATER VAULT NIC NOT IN CONTRACT ABBREVIATIONS: N.T.S PROJECT LOCATION N N NONE 01 10 SIERRA BOULEVARD MANZANITA AVENUE

SEQUOIA STREET

MARIPOSA STREET
INTERSTATE 80 DOUGLAS BOULEVARD WASHINGTON BOULEVARD DEFERRED BUILDING DIVISION SUBMITTALS SHADE STRUCTURE: - SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT FORM - SHADE STRUCTURE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS - SHADE STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS 7/22/25

Page 389 of 1281 ends

6"SS 6"SS 6"W 6"W
SS 4 1.2 1 1.1 1.3 5 6 2 2 7 9 979 3 3 10 11 17 17 17 11 13 12 14 13 1515 161616 8 18 EXISTING HALF BASKETBALL COURT TO REMAIN - PROTECT DURING COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMIT OF WORK 181818 1:10 & 02 10 0' 05' 10' 20' N PRESENTATION: DESIGN: VERIFICATION: DRAWING: R E V I S I O N E S N° DATE 415 SIERRA BLVD, ROSEVILLE, CA, 95678 CONSULTANT: APPROVED : SHEET: OF JOSHUA RAUL CERVANTES SCALE: DATE: L0.0 WOODBRIDGE TENNIS & PICKLEBALL COURT RENOVATION CONSTRUCTION/SCOPE OF WORK PLAN ADD ALTERNATIVE 1. REMOVE/SALVAGE EXISTING BENCH AND RELOCATE AS SHOWN. INSTALL VIA IN SURFACE MOUNT AND PER PARKS STANDARD DETAIL PK-MI-2. 1.1. REMOVE EXISTING BENCH AND INSTALL SAVAGED BENCH IN SURFACE MOUNT, PER PARKS STANDARD DETAIL PK-MI-2. 1.2. EXISTING BENCH TO BE SALVAGED AND REINSTALLED IN SURFACE MOUNT, PER PARKS STANDARD DETAIL PK-MI-2. 1.3. EXISTING UTILITY BOX TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE AND TRASH CAN TO BE PUT BACK IN PLACE AFTER CONSTRUCTION. 2. REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING AC PAVEMENT. REFER TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS FOR TYPE AND PROCESS. 3. COMPACT EXISTING BASE AND PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW BASE AS NEEDED. REFER TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS FOR TYPE AND PROCESS. 4. PROVIDE AND INSTALL THREE (3) 6' BENCHES IN SURFACE MOUNT AS SHOWN. NEW BENCHES SHALL BE MODEL #BYP0-A-32-00 AS MANUFACTURED BY MYTCOAT, OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL PER PARKS STANDARD DETAIL PK-MI-2. COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY THE CITY. 5. CITY TO PURCHASE NEW 24' X 10' COVERED SHADE STRUCTURE FOR SEATING AREA AS SHOWN. SHADE STRUCTURE SHALL BE HIP T CANTI AS MANUFACTURED BY USA SHADE. COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY THE CITY. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS. 6. REMOVE EXISTING TENNIS NETS (2) AND POSTS (4) AND INSTALL NEW TENNIS NETS (1), AND POSTS (2), AND FOOTINGS PER USTA. NEW TENNIS NET SYSTEM: POSTS SHALL BE MODEL #RTP-300-BLK, NET SHALL BE MODEL #TPL-5, GROUND ANCHOR SHALL BE MODEL #A-2. TENNIS NET TIE DOWN STRAP SHALL BE MODEL #CS-1, ALL COMPONENTS MANUFACTURED BY JAYPRO SPORTS OR APPROVED EQUAL - CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM WHICH ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS COME WITH PURCHASE OF NET AND POST. COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY CITY. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS. 7. PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW PICKLEBALL NETS (2), POSTS (4), AND FOOTINGS PER USAPA. PICKLEBALL BET SYSTEM: POSTS SHALL BE MODEL PPR10BK, NETS, CENTER GROUND ANCHOR, AND FOOTINGS, SHALL BE PPR-10. ALL COMPONENTS MANUFACTURED BY JAYPRO SPORTS, OR APPROVED EQUAL- CONFIRM WHICH ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS COME WITH PURCHASE OF NET AND POST. COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY CITY. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS. 8. PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW TENNIS COURT STRIPING PER USTA. PLEXIPAVE HI-HIDE PLEXICOLOR LINE PAINT, OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS 9. PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW PICKLEBALL COURT STRIPING PER USAPA. PLEXIPAVE HI-HIDE PLEXICOLOR LINE PAINT, OR APPROVED EQUAL. COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY THE CITY. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS. 10. PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW 6' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH WINDSCREEN. WINDSCREEN SHALL BE PUTTERMAN ATHLETICS TENN-AIR PRO, OR APPROVED EQUAL. COLOR AS SELECTED BY THE CITY. INSTALL FENCE PER PARKS STANDARD DETAIL PK-BF-2. 11. REMOVE AC WALK AND REPLACE EXISTING SWING GATE WITH CHAIN LINK FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING PERIMETER FENCING. PROVIDE AND INSTALL FENCE PER PARKS STANDARD DETAIL PK-BF-2. PURCHASE AND INSTALL 3" THICK WALK ON BARK MULCH WHERE AC WALK EXISTED. REFER TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS FOR BARK TYPE. 12. REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING SWING GATE WITH CHAIN LINK FENCE. PROVIDE AND INSTALL FENCE PER PARKS STANDARD DETAIL PK-MI-2. 13. REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE, PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW CHAIN LINK SWING GATE WITH WINDSCREEN PER PARKS STANDARD. REFER TO PLANS FOR DETAILS. ALL NEW GATES SHALL FOLLOW THE SAME SIZING AND FORM AS ORIGINAL GATES 14. REMOVE CONCRETE GUTTER, INSTALL UNDER WALK DRAIN AND COBBLE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. CITY TO PROVIDE COBBLE. SEE SHEET L1.6 FOR DETAILS. 15. PROVIDE AND INSTALL TWO SWING GATES WITH WINDSCREEN. WINDSCREEN SHALL BE PUTTERMAN ATHLETICS TENN-AIR PRO, OR APPROVED EQUAL. COLOR AS SELECTED BY THE CITY. INSTALL GATE PER PARKS STANDARDS. REFER TO PLANS FOR DETAILS. 16. REMOVE EXISTING MULCH AS SHOWN, PROVIDE AND INSTALL 3" THICK WALK ON BARK MULCH. REFER TO DEMOLITION PLAN REGARDING CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND TYPE. PROTECT EXISTING IRRIGATION IN PLACE IN KIND. CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE ANY DAMAGED IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION, TYP. 17. PROVIDE AND INSTALL COURT PERIMETER WINDSCREEN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING FENCE HEIGHT. REFER TO PLANS FOR WINDSCREEN DETAIL. WINDSCREEN SHALL BE PUTTERMAN ATHLETICS TENN-AIR PRO, OR APPROVED EQUAL. COLOR AS SELECTED BY THE CITY. 18. PROVIDE AND INSTALL COURT PERIMETER NOISE REDUCING ACOUSTIC FABRIC ALONG THE STREET SIDE OF THE PLAYING COURT. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY FENCE HEIGHT. ACOUSTIC FABRIC SHALL BE ACOUSTIBLOK ACOUSTIFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS. COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY THE CITY. WOODBRIDGE PARK TENNIS & PICKLEBALL COURT RENOVATION PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK BASE BID

Page 390 of 1281 ends

6"SS
SS EXISTING MAINTENANCE GATE EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING COMFORT STATION EXISTING COVERED BOCCE BALL COURT EXISTING BENCH (TYP.) EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE (TYP.) EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE (TYP.) EXISTING STORAGE BOXES EXISTING TENNIS/PICKLE BALL COURTS EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE (TYP.) EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE (TYP.) EXISTING CONCRETE PAD EXISTING CONCRETE GUTTER EXISTING UTILITY LINES TO PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRASH CAN AND UTILITY TO REMAIN IN PLACE EXISTING CONCRETE SLOPED WALK EXISTING BARK MULCH EXISTING UTILITY TO REMAIN IN PLACE 2 2 2 2 2 EXISTING HALF BASKETBALL COURT TO REMAIN - PROTECT DURING COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION PROTECT AND/OR REPLACE EXISTING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IN KIND (TYP.) REFER TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION LIMIT OF WORK SYMBOL QTY NAME / ITEM EXISTING BARK MULCH EXISTING CONCRETE APPROX. 1,500 SQ FT. APPROX. 260 SQ FT. EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES TO REMAIN APPROX. 11,860 SQ FT. 5 REMARKS EXISTING MULCH WITHIN THE SCOPE OF WORK EXISTING CONCRETE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF WORK EXISTING AC COURT PAVEMENT WITH CRACKS LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE EXISTING CONDTIONS SCHEDULEEXISTING CHAIN LINK SWING GATES 3 REFER TO DEMO PLAN FOR CHAIN LINK SWING GATE REMOVAL LOCATIONS 12 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN TREES TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE 6"SS - EXISTING UTILITY LINE PROTECT IN PLACE - EXISTING WATER LINE PROTECT IN PLACE PRESENTATION: DESIGN: VERIFICATION: DRAWING: R E V I S I O N E S N° DATE 415 SIERRA BLVD, ROSEVILLE, CA, 95678 CONSULTANT: APPROVED : SHEET: OF JOSHUA RAUL CERVANTES SCALE: DATE: L1.0 WOODBRIDGE TENNIS & PICKLEBALL COURT RENOVATION EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN Xref ..\xREF\xTB 24 x 36 - DRAINAGE DETAILS.dwg 1:10 03 10 0' 05' 10' 20' N

Page 391 of 1281 ends

6"SS 6"W
SS REMOVE AND REPLACE AC PAVEMENT REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE AND INSTALL SWING GATE PER DETAIL 1, L1.4 REMOVE SECTION OF CONCRETE GUTTER AS SHOWN AND INSTALL UNDER WALK DRAIN REMOVE AND REPLACE BARK MULCH (ADD ALTERNATE) REMOVE EXISTING BENCH AND REPLACE WITH SALVAGED BENCH REMOVE CONCRETE WALK AND REPLACE WITH BARK MULCH REMOVE EXISTING GATE AND SEAL CHAIN LINK FENCE REMOVE EXISTING GATE AND SEAL CHAIN LINK FENCE REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE AND INSTALL SWING GATE. INSTALL PER DETAIL 2, L1.4 REMOVE AND REPLACE BARK MULCH (ADD ALTERNATE) AL1.6 PK-24 L1.4 PK-BF-2 L1.7 (TYP.) (TYP.) REMOVE/SALVAGE EXISTING BENCH AND RELOCATE AS SHOWN EXISTING UTILITY BOX TO REMAIN IN PLACE EXISTING HALF BASKETBALL COURT TO REMAIN - PROTECT DURING COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION EXISTING MAINTENANCE GATE TO REMAIN REMOVE EXISTING BENCH DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REINSTALL IN SURFACE MOUNT PER CITY SPECIFICATIONS LIMIT OF WORK PROTECT AND/OR REPLACE EXISTING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IN KIND (TYP.) REFER TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS, PK-BF-2 LATEST EDITION L1.7 DEMO SYMBOL QTY NAME / ITEM REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING WALK ON MULCH REMOVE CONCRETE APPROX. 1,500 SQ FT. APPROX. 208 SQ FT. REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING AC PAVEMENT. REMOVE EXISTING SECTIONS OF CHAIN LINK FENCE APPROX. 11,860 SQ FT. APPROX. 50 LF. REMARKS REFER TO BARK MULCH NOTES FOR SPECIFICATIONS REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE AND REPLACE WITH ELEMENTS PER SCOPE OF WORK PLAN PROVIDE AND INSTALL MULTI-PART ACRYLIC COLOR AND SURFACING SYSTEM, PLEXIPAVE SYSTEM AS MANUFACTURED BY CALIFORNIA SPORTS SURFACES, OR EQUAL, OVER 2-1/2" AC PAVING. AC PAVING TO BE PLACED IN 1 LIFT. REPLACE WITH ACCESS GATE AS SHOWN IN SCOPE OF WORK PLAN DEMO SCHEDULE SHEET # DETAIL # 2 REMOVE EXISTING SWING GATE REPLACE WITH CHAIN LINK FENCE AS SHOWN IN SCOPE OF WORK PLAN XXX 1 REMOVE/REPLACE BENCH REMOVE EXISTING BENCH AS SHOWN AND REPLACE WITH SALVAGED BENCH AS SHOWN ON SCOPE OF WORK PLAN APPLY THREE (3') INCHES OF BARK MULCH IN AREAS AS SHOWN - KEEP MULCH A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4') INCHES AWAY FROM EXISTING TREE TRUNKS. TAPER MULCH PROFILE AWAY FROM TREE TRUNK TO AVOID SUBSEQUENT COLLECTION. CONTRACTOR MUST RECEIVE AN APPROVED SUBMITTAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION BARK MULCH TO BE: A.A. REGULAR "WALK-ON" FIR BARK AS MANUFACTURED BY REDI-GRO CORPORATION, SACRAMENTO, CA (916) 381-6063, MALLARD CREEK, INC, ROCKLIN, CA (916) 645-1681, MY BARK COMPANY, INC., LINDEN, CA (209) 649-4250 OR ACCEPTED EQUAL. B.B. DECORATIVE BARK, SHREDDED LUMBER OR SAW DUST, AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS ARE NOT PERMITTED. THE MULCH MUST BE FREE OF NEEDLES. BARK MULCH NOTES* 0' 05' 10' 20' N PRESENTATION: DESIGN: VERIFICATION: DRAWING: R E V I S I O N E S N° DATE 415 SIERRA BLVD, ROSEVILLE, CA, 95678 CONSULTANT: APPROVED : SHEET: OF DEMO PLAN JOSHUA RAUL CERVANTES SCALE: DATE: L1.1 WOODBRIDGE TENNIS & PICKLEBALL COURT RENOVATION 1:10 & 04 10

Page 392 of 1281 ends

6"SS 6"SS 6"W 6"W
SS
8' - 0" 9'
8' - 0" 7' - 0" 7' - 0" 7' - 0" MIN
20' - 0" 20' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 9' 6' TALL WITH WIND SCREEN 11' - 6" 9' - 6" 9' - 6" 14' - 0" (TYP.) PROPOSED PICKLEBALL COURT PROPOSED PICKLEBALL COURT PROPOSED DUAL STRIPED TENNIS/PICKLE BALL COURT 6' TALL SWING GATE 6' TALL SWING GATE 6' TALL FENCE WITH WINDSCREEN PROPOSED SWING GATE PROPOSED ENTRANCE 24' 10'
6'
1'-6"
6'
1'-6"
6'
1'-6" SHADE STRUCTURE 6' LONG BENCHES (TYP.) REPLACE BENCH WITH SALVAGED BENCH EXISTING BENCH TO REMAIN LIMIT OF WORK REPLACE BARK MULCH (ADD ALTERNATIVE) REMOVE AC AND REPLACE WITH BARK MULCH REPLACE BARK MULCH (ADD ALTERNATIVE) AL1.61 L1.7 2 L1.7 3 L1.4 (TYP.) (TYP.) (TYP.) 6' - 0" 6' - 0" REPLACE BARK MULCH (ADD ALTERNATIVE) 21'-4" 21'-4" COURT PERIMETER WINDSCREEN (ADD ALTERNATE) COURT PERIMETER WINDSCREEN (ADD ALTERNATE) EXISTING HALF BASKETBALL COURT TO REMAIN - PROTECT DURING COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION PROTECT AND/OR REPLACE EXISTING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IN KIND (TYP.) REFER TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION ACOUSTIC FABRIC (ADD ALTERNATIVE) ACOUSTIC FABRIC (ADD ALTERNATIVE) CLEARANCE 30' 60'
15' 7' 7' 15' 20' 5'
8' MIN (TYP.) 5' (TYP.)
44' 10' 20' WIDTH COURT 22'
36"
34" NETTING SECTION PICKLEBALL NET AND POSTS - REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK FOR SPECIFICATIONS PICKLEBALL STRIPING PER CURRENT USAPA STANDARDS - REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK FOR SPECIFICATIONS PICKLEBALL AND POSTS - REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK FOR SPECIFICATIONS CLEARANCE 18' 21' 21' 18' 4'-6" 27' 4'-6" 42'-0" 21'-0"
20' MIN (TYP.) 7' TENNIS COURT NETTING SECTION 10' TENNIS STRIPING PER CURRENT USTA STANDARDS - REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK FOR SPECIFICATIONS TENNIS NET AND POSTS - REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK FOR SPECIFICATIONS PICKLEBALL STRIPING PER CURRENT USAPA STANDARDS - REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK FOR SPECIFICATIONS TENNIS NET AND POSTS - REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK FOR SPECIFICATIONS 36' SHEET # DETAIL # XXX T TENNIS/PICKLEBALL DUAL COURT LAYOUT P PICKLEBALL COURT LAYOUT SCALE: 1" - 10' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0' 05' 10' 20' N GENERAL NOTES: A) COURT LAYOUTS ARE PROVIDED AS A REFERENCE - CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM COURT LAYOUTS WITH THE MOST UP TO DATE USAPA STANDARDS B) REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK PLAN FOR MATERIAL AND STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL NOTES: A) COURT LAYOUTS ARE PROVIDED AS A REFERENCE - CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM COURT LAYOUTS WITH THE MOST UP TO DATE USAPA/USTA STANDARDS B) REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK PLAN FOR MATERIAL AND STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS PRESENTATION: DESIGN: VERIFICATION: DRAWING: R E V I S I O N E S N° DATE 415 SIERRA BLVD, ROSEVILLE, CA, 95678 CONSULTANT: APPROVED : SHEET: OF LAYOUT PLAN JOSHUA RAUL CERVANTES SCALE: DATE: L1.2 WOODBRIDGE TENNIS & PICKLEBALL COURT RENOVATION 1:10 & 05 10

Page 393 of 1281 ends

Roseville City CouncilAugust 20, 2025

Roseville City Council
August 20, 2025