Roseville Electric Building,
116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor
roseville.ca.us
The City of Roseville welcomes your participation.
Meeting Schedule: Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the first and third Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m.
Two Public Comment Periods for Non-Agenda Items: A total of twenty-five (25) minutes is allotted for public comments. At the beginning and end of the meeting, each speaker has three (3) minutes to address the Mayor/Chair on issues that are not listed on the agenda and are within the City’s jurisdiction. Please submit a yellow speaker card to the City Clerk before the item is heard if you wish to make a comment. You will still have an opportunity to comment if you haven’t filled out a yellow speaker card.
Brown Act: The City Council cannot discuss or act on items not listed on the agenda. Public Comment on Agenda Items: Each speaker has five (5) minutes to address items that are listed on the agenda.
Levine Act Provisions: If you’ve made a campaign contribution totaling more than $500 ($250 prior to January 1, 2025) to City Council Members in the last twelve (12) months, you must disclose it before addressing an item on the agenda. Please visit Levine Act – City of Roseville for updated forms and information.
Audio/Visual Presentations: If making a presentation regarding an agenda item, audio/visual materials must be submitted to the City Clerk for consideration at least 72 hours in advance.
Americans with Disabilities Act: If special assistance is required to participate in a meeting, including the need of auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City Clerk at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. City Clerk 311 Vernon Street [email protected] 916-774-5263 TDD: 916-774-5220
Security Measures: All meeting attendees must successfully pass through a security metal detector. Any person with a prohibited item will not be allowed entry. Prohibited items include but are not limited to firearms (even with valid CCW), knives, pepper spray/mace, explosives of any kind/any weapons and/or dangerous devices of any kind, illegal drugs, and alcohol.
Viewing Options: The City of Roseville provides three options for viewing meetings:
Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
February 18, 2026
6:00 PM
Roseville Electric Building,
116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
V. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the first opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Placer Valley Tourism - 2026 Strategic Plan and Budget (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Strategic Plan and the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Budget. There is no fiscal impact to the City associated with this recommendation. Funding for these activities is derived from room night assessments collected from hotels in Lincoln, Rocklin and Roseville. This assessment is separate and distinct from the 10% Transient Occupancy Tax collected by the City of Roseville from Roseville hotels.
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-037 approving the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Strategic Plan and the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Budget.
2. Audit Services Agreement (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approving an audit services agreement with CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP in the amount of $509,560 to provide financial auditing services for fiscal years 2025-26, 2026-27, and 2027-28. Funding for these services is included in the budgets of Finance; Parks,
Recreation & Libraries; the Other Post-Employment Benefits Trust; Housing; Electric; the Roseville Natural Gas Finance Authority; Transit; Youth Development; the South Placer Wastewater Authority; and the Bizz Johnson Highway Interchange Joint Powers Authority.
CONTACT: Teri Quinlan 916-774-5316 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-036 approving an audit services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
3. Sierra Vista Specific Plan Grading of Bike Trail in FD-81 and FD-82A Project - New Capital Improvement Project Approval, Reimbursement Agreement, and Budget Adjustment (PUBLIC
WORKS DEPARTMENT - TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project and approval of a reimbursement agreement with John Mourier Construction, Inc. in the amount of $57,357 to provide grading of the multi-use trail in Parcels FD-81 and FD-82A in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan. Staff also recommends approval of a budget adjustment of $57,357 for the grading. Funding is available from bike trail development fees collected for the Sierra Vista Specific Plan. No General Fund resources will be used for this project.
CONTACT: Suzanne Engelke 916-746-1289 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project - Sierra Vista Specific Plan Grading of Bike Trail in FD-81 and FD-82A Project; and
b. Adopt Resolution No. 26-030 approving an reimbursement agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and John Mourier Construction, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
c. Adopt Ordinance No. 7042 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
4. Roseville Parkway Widening Project — Adoption of Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Project Approval, Approval of Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Call for Bids (PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING - CITY PROJECT'S)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Roseville Parkway Widening Project, approval of the project described therein, approval of the plans and specifications for Roseville Parkway Widening Project - Phase 1, and authorization for staff to call for bids. The project scope of Phase 1 consists of widening portions of Roseville Parkway from West Drive to Creekside Ridge Drive and at the Pleasant Grove Boulevard intersection. Improvements also
include modifications to existing traffic signals, sidewalks, curb and gutter, updated signing and striping, and necessary utility adjustments. The construction of the project is estimated to cost $3.5 million and will be primarily funded by the special tax revenue generated in the North Central Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1. No General Fund resources will be used for the project.
CONTACT: Karen Vences 916-774-5412 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-033 adopting the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Roseville Parkway Widening Project; and
b. Approve the project as described therein; and
c. Approve the plans and specifications for Roseville Parkway Widening - Phase 1 and authorize staff to call for bids.
5. Microtransit Vehicles Purchase - Budget Adjustment (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -
TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $118,024 to align project funding to available grant and local match funding for the procurement of Ford E- Transit 350 vans. Roseville Transit is currently purchasing twelve (12) Ford E-Transit 350 vans through the CA State (CalACT #20-01) procurement. There are two existing City projects with grant funds secured for this procurement. This budget adjustment will increase the available funding within the Microtransit Vehicle and Charger Purchase project for an additional federal grant that was received for this procurement. Federal funds in the amount of $98,353 are being applied, along with an additional Local Transportation Fund grant match of $19,671. These funds will increase the total project budget by $118,024 to a total project budget of $818,024. The additional funding will go towards aftermarket add-ons including radios and monitoring cameras. There is no impact to the General Fund.
CONTACT: Zachary Presley 916-774-5365 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7041 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
6. Western Systems Power Pool Agreement Collateral Annex (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT -
FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Western Systems Power Pool (WSPP) Collateral Annex, including the Cover Sheet Elections, with Karbone Energy LLC (Karbone). The documents supplement the WSPP Agreement previously executed by the City and establish industry- standard credit and collateral provisions that would apply to any future wholesale physical
power transactions with Karbone under the WSPP framework. There is no cost associated with the execution of these documents.
CONTACT: Patrick Zanardelli 916-774-5673 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-031 approving the Western Systems Power Pool Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Elections, by and between the City of Roseville and Karbone Energy LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
7. Holt Substation Civil Design - Professional Design Services Agreement (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional design services agreement with Mesa Associates, Inc. in the amount of $493,074.80 to provide civil design services for the design of the Holt Substation. Staff additionally requests authority to approve unforeseen change orders up to 5% of the cost, or $24,653.74, for a total of $517,728.54, with funding included in the Electric Department's FY2025-26 budget in the Electric Fund.
CONTACT: Vincent Bottoni 916-774-5641 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-027 approving a professional design services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Mesa Associates, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
8. Environmental Energy Products - Brokerage Services Agreement Amendment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WASTEWATER)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Brokerage Enabling Agreement for Environmental Energy Products with Equus Energy Group, LLC. This amendment allows Equus to add brokerage of the Renewable Identification Numbers credits provided by the Environmental Protection Agency for fuel generated by the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant's Energy Recovery Facility. This work will be funded through a portion of the payments received for the credits.
CONTACT: Jason Fick 916-746-1940 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-035 approving an amendment to brokerage services agreement between the City of Roseville and Equus Energy Group, LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
9. Solid Waste Compliance Software – Professional Services Agreement Amendment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - STRATEGIC AFFAIRS DIVISION )
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the existing professional services agreement with SMART Compliance to incorporate the required Information Technology (IT) terms, cybersecurity provisions, and a Technology Security and Standards Matrix that were inadvertently omitted from the original agreement approved on November 5, 2025. The amendment does not increase the contract amount, which remains $110,500 and is included in the FY2025–26 Waste Services Operations Fund budget. The project continues to be fully funded through the CalRecycle SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant.
CONTACT: Michelle White 916-774-5774 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-029 approving a first amendment to the professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and SMART Compliance, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
10. Building Plan Check and Inspection Services — On-Call Professional Services Agreement Amendment and Budget Adjustment (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - BUSINESS
SERVICES DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the sixth amendment to the on-call professional services agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., for building and fire life safety plan review and inspection services, increasing contract authority by $250,000 for FY2025-26 and bringing the total contract value to $750,000. Staff also recommends approval of a budget adjustment totaling $500,000 for FY2025-26, with $250,000 allocated to the Development Services budget and $250,000 allocated to the Fire budget. The need for additional contract and budget authority is driven by increased inspection activity, primarily associated with the Bosch Semiconductor Plant construction, as well as anticipated plan review services for tenant improvements at the Galleria Mall. Funding is included in the Development Services and Fire budgets and is fully recoverable through permit fee revenue. While expenditures will increase due to increased workload, corresponding revenues will also increase, resulting in no net impact on the General Fund.
CONTACT: Stacie Marchetti 916-774-5278 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-032 approving a sixth amendment to professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7043 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
11. 1751 Pleasant Grove Boulevard - Grocery Outlet Parcel Map (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Grocery Outlet parcel map. Engineering has completed its review of the parcel map and found that it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 3 lots for future development. The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.
CONTACT: Ed Winston 916-774-5432 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the parcel map on file with the City Clerk; and
b. Accept, on behalf of the public, the public easements and right of way offered thereon for dedication.
12. Downtown Roseville Security Patrol - Professional Services Agreement Amendment (POLICE
DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a first amendment to a professional services agreement with Universal Protection Service, LP dba Allied Universal Security Services in the amount of $166,411.59 to continue to provide private security patrols in the Downtown and Historic Old Town areas to assist in providing public safety. Funding is included in the Police Department's FY2025-26 operating budget in the General Fund.
CONTACT: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-028 approving a first amendment to professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Universal Protection Service, LP dba Allied Universal Security Services, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
13. Second Reading - 2025 Speed Limit Update - Roseville Municipal Code Amendment (PUBLIC
WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an ordinance for second reading amending Section
11.28.010 of Chapter 11.28 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding change in speed limits set by state law.
CONTACT: Jerome Pastor 916-746-1352 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7045 amending Section 11.28.010 of Chapter 11.28 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding change in speed limits set by state law.
14. Legal Services Agreement (CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an agreement with The Law Offices of Lisa Prince, dba The Prince Firm, to provide legal services. Expenses will be paid by the Human Resources Department's or the City Attorney's operating budget in the General Fund, or by other departments and funds as appropriate.
CONTACT: Jonathan Levy 916-774-5325 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-034 approving an agreement for legal services, by and between the City of Roseville and The Law Offices of Lisa Prince, dba The Prince Firm, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
15. Staffing Changes and Administrative Corrections to Labor Market Adjustments (HUMAN
RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: As part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing levels to provide a high level of service to the community, staff recommends that the City Council adopt ordinances to approve the administrative corrections to the Roseville Police Association (RPA) A & B salary schedules reflecting the labor market adjustments, updating the salary percentage change to Animal Services Officers, Animal Services Supervisor and Community Services Officer I/II; and to the Management A & B salary schedules reflecting the administrative correction to the attached salary schedule for Business Systems Supervisor, Database Supervisor and Information Technology Supervisor. Updates to the City allocation schedule reflect the addition of two (2), regular, full-time positions consisting of one (1) Police Lieutenant and one (1) Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 8hrs; and the deletion of one (1) regular, full-time Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24hrs. The estimated total cost of the recommended position adjustments to the General Fund will be $112,473 for the remainder of FY2025-26, which can be absorbed by existing appropriations; therefore, no budget adjustment is required at this time. There will be a Wastewater Operations Fund savings of $4,583 for the remainder of FY2025-26. Beyond this fiscal year, the recommended changes have an annual ongoing impact of $306,146 to the General Fund and cost savings of $13,240 to the Wastewater Operations Fund.
CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7046 amending Ordinance No. 7022, the salary Ordinance for Non- Sworn Employees represented by the Roseville Police Association, as amended by Appendix "G" to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7047 amending Ordinance No. 7024, the salary Ordinance for Management Employees, as amended by Appendix "O" to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and
c. Approve the attached city-wide allocation schedule effective February 21, 2026.
16. Proclamation - Government Communicators Day
Summary: Proclaim February 20, 2026, as Government Communicators Day and encourage all residents to recognize Roseville government communications employees who have dedicated their careers to ensure the City of Roseville has effective, impactful, and successful communication strategies that resonate and are relevant.
CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]
17. Proclamation - Procurement Month
Summary: Proclaim March 2026 as Procurement Month and urge all citizens to join the City of Roseville in recognizing the contribution and importance of our Purchasing Division employees and their impact within business, industry and government.
CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]
18. Minutes of Prior Meetings (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the January 28, 2026 City Council Special Closed Meeting, and February 4, 2026 City Council Legislative Platform Workshop Meeting, City Council Special Closed Session Meeting and City Council Meeting.
CONTACT: Adilia Keller 916-774-5265 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the minutes of the January 28, 2026 City Council Special Closed Meeting, and February 4, 2026 City Council Legislative Platform Workshop Meeting, City Council Special Closed Session Meeting and City Council Meeting.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VII. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
19. Salary Schedule Ordinance for City Council Appointed Positions, Amendments to Employment and Personal Services Agreements (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the City Council Appointed Positions salary schedule reflecting a four and one-half percent (4.5%) percent salary increase for the City Attorney and an eight and one-half percent (8.5%) salary increase for the City Manager, effective February 21, 2026, and a three percent (3%) general wage increase effective the first full pay period in January 2027, at the same time the same increase is processed for other management employees. In addition, staff recommends Council approve a Third Amendment to the Employment and Personal Services agreement with Michelle Sheidenberger and a First Amendment to the Employment and Personal Services agreement with Dominick Casey to reflect that evaluations will be completed at least every two (2) years. Dominick Casey’s agreement will also revise the vehicle allowance benefit to a vehicle allowance and unreimbursed business expenses allowance with an $800/month increase. The City Attorney and City Manager operating budgets have sufficient funds available to cover the additional salary
and benefits costs for the current fiscal year, and the ongoing annual costs of $21,845 and $57,415, respectively, will be incorporated in the proposed FY2026-27 City Attorney and City Manager budgets in the General Fund.
CONTACT: Stacey Peterson 916-774-5374 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7044 amending Ordinance No. 6900 the salary ordinance for City Council appointed positions, as amended by appendix "T" to be effective February 21, 2026 as an urgency measure; and
b. Adopt Resolution No. 26-038 approving a third amendment to employment and personal services agreement between the City of Roseville and Michelle Sheidenberger, and authorizing the Mayor to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
c. Adopt Resolution No. 26-039 approving a first amendment to employment and personal services agreement between the City of Roseville and Dominick Casey, and authorizing the Mayor to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
d. Approve a three percent (3%) general wage increase effective the first full pay period in January 2027 for the City Attorney and City Manager, at the same time the same increase is processed for other management employees.
20. General Municipal Election Ballot Measure - Council Compensation Adjustment and Inflation Limitation Measure - November 3, 2026 (CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution submitting a ballot measure for the Council Compensation Adjustment and Inflation Limitation Measure to the voters of the City of Roseville at the next General Municipal Election to be held on November 3, 2026; requesting Placer County Board of Supervisors consolidate the election with any other election conducted on the same date; and requesting election services be provided by the Placer County Clerk to submit a ballot measure for the Council Compensation Adjustment and Inflation Limitation Measure to the voters of the City of Roseville.
CONTACT: Joseph Speaker 916-774-5325 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-040 submitting a ballot measure for the Council Compensation Adjustment and Inflation Limitation Measure to the voters of the City of Roseville at the next General Municipal Election to be held on November 3, 2026; requesting Placer County Board of Supervisors consolidate the election with any other election conducted on the same date; and requesting election services be provided by the Placer County Clerk to submit a ballot measure for the Council Compensation Adjustment and Inflation Limitation Measure to the voters of the City of Roseville.
VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the second opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
IX. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
X. ADJOURNMENT
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 2/18/2026
Item #: VI.1
File #: 0110-01
Item ID: 2026-3
Title: Placer Valley Tourism - 2026 Strategic Plan and Budget Contact: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Strategic Plan and the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Budget. There is no fiscal impact to the City associated with this recommendation. Funding for these activities is derived from room night assessments collected from hotels in Lincoln, Rocklin and Roseville. This assessment is separate and distinct from the 10% Transient Occupancy Tax collected by the City of Roseville from Roseville hotels.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Strategic Plan and the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Budget.
BACKGROUND
The South Placer County Tourism Corporation, dba Placer Valley Tourism (PVT), promotes and supports tourism efforts that generate overnight stays within the region. Revenue for these efforts is derived from hotel room night assessments collected from hotels in Lincoln, Rocklin and Roseville. This assessment was voted on and approved by all hotel owners in 2014.
On November 5, 2014, the City entered into a Marketing Management Agreement with PVT authorizing PVT to administer and implement all activities and improvements within the Placer Valley Sports Complex and Tourism Marketing District (District). Assessments received from the District are directed by the PVT Board, comprised of hotel, Chamber and city representatives from Roseville, Rocklin and Lincoln.
Pursuant to the Marketing Management Agreement, and as required by state law, the PVT strategic marketing plan and budget must undergo annual review and approval by the City Council. The City Council may approve the plan and budget as submitted or may modify any particular matter contained within these documents.
The attached strategic marketing plan and budget were approved by the PVT Board of directors on November 20, 2025. The top priorities in the 2026 Strategic Marketing plan include:
1. Maximize room night production for the Placer Valley Soccer Complex through PVT-related events.
2. Ensure the ongoing sustainability and success of @the Grounds while fostering continued growth and development.
3. Identify and cultivate relationships with key business and community partners, actively seeking opportunities to collaborate and drive positive impact.
4. Plan for future projects and meet current obligations while ensuring financial strength and flexibility.
5. Strategic development of tourism-related facilities is critical to driving hotel demand and fostering
economic growth.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City associated with this recommendation. Funding for these PVT activities comes from hotel room night assessments collected from hotels in Lincoln, Rocklin and Roseville. This assessment is separate from the 10% Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) collected by the City of Roseville from Roseville hotels.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The approval of the Placer Valley Tourism Annual Budget and Strategic Work Plan meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
3. Enhance economic vitality
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeannine Thrash, Management Analyst
Scott Pettingell, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-037
2. 2026 PVT Strategic Plan
3. 2026 PVT Budget
REVIEWERS:
Jeannine Thrash, Finance Department Created/Initiated - 1/16/2026 Scott Pettingell, Finance Department Approved - 2/3/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/3/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/3/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/3/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/3/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 2/4/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/4/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-037
APPROVING THE 2026 PLACER VALLEY TOURISM STRATEGIC PLAN AND THE 2026 PLACER VALLEY TOURISM BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Placer Valley Sports Complex and Tourism Marketing District (District) was created in November 2014 to replace the former South Placer County Tourism Business Improvement Area; and
WHEREAS, Placer Valley Tourism (PVT) administers the District under a Marketing Management Agreement which requires PVT to submit an annual budget and work plan to the City; and
WHEREAS, the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Strategic Plan and the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Budget have been reviewed by the City Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Strategic Plan and the 2026 Placer Valley Tourism Budget are hereby approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
PAGE TITLE
PAGE HEADLINE
Body Text
A Strategic Vision for
Sustainable Growth
Year 2 Update
Placer Valley Tourism
2025-2029 Strategic Plan
PAGE 2
PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 Update
As Placer Valley Tourism (PVT) closes out year one of its five-year strategic plan, the five core priorities identified at adoption continue to provide clear focus and alignment for both the Board and staff.
Entering year two of the plan in 2026, three priority areas will take the lead in guiding strategy and long-term investment. While sports tourism continues to drive strong weekend performance, PVT has identified a strategic opportunity to grow meetings, conferences, and corporate travel to strengthen midweek demand and expand overall economic impact. Staff will explore the feasibility of developing a recommended meeting venue on the @the Grounds (ATG) campus, with particular attention to environmental requirements and financing models.
The Placer Valley Soccer Complex (PVSC) will be closely monitored in its first full year of operations, with a strong emphasis on hotel room night production. In coordination with the Roebbelen Center, year two efforts will focus on maximizing room nights and proactively soliciting events to fill key open dates across both facilities.
Additionally, the launch of a new associate membership program will support multiple strategic objectives by strengthening relationships beyond the hotel sector and connecting visitors with local businesses and services. As sports travel continues to grow, this program will respond to increasing demand for local connections while generating a modest revenue stream to support staffing and targeted marketing efforts.
Through strategic room night management at ATG and PVSC, evaluation of a potential new meeting venue, and the introduction of the associate membership program, PVT remains focused on enhancing hotel vitality and positioning Placer Valley as a premier destination. These efforts reflect our commitment to sustainable growth, thoughtful planning, and long-term economic benefit for the community.
Summary
Body Text
KEY METRICS
State of the Organization
498498 Placer Valley Tourism tracked
hotel room night data from 498
events ranging from sports, to
concerts, meetings, and more!
506,064506,064
PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 UpdatePAGE 3
Hotel Room Nights Sold
25 hotels in Roseville, Rocklin, & Lincoln
from January - September, 2025
70%70%
Hotel Occupancy Rate
found by dividing the total
number of rooms sold by the
total number of rooms available
$70M$70M
Hotel Sales Revenue
25 hotels in Roseville, Rocklin,
& Lincoln from January -
September, 2025
40,90240,902
PVT Related
Room Nights
(Jan-Sept)
A 26% increase
from 2024
2025 Events (Jan-Sept)
29,269 32,366
40,902
2023 2024 2025
PLACER VALLEY HOTELS AVERAGE OCCUPANCY MIDWEEK VS WEEKEND CHART State of the Organization
PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 UpdatePAGE 4
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Mid Week OCC 70% 70% 68% 67% 65%
Weekend OCC 83% 83% 84% 83% 81%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
Average Occupancy Mid Week vs Weekend
Jan - Sept 2021 - 2025
PLACER VALLEY HOTELS AVERAGE DAILY RATE MIDWEEK VS WEEKEND CHART State of the Organization
PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 UpdatePAGE 5
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Weekend ADR 124.91 159.19 158.96 155.63 156.54
Mid Week ADR 107.12 132.29 131.03 127.32 129.23
$100
$110
$120
$130
$140
$150
$160
$170
Average Daily Rate Mid Week vs Weekend
Jan - Sept 2021 - 2025
PLACER VALLEY STR OCCUPANCY BY MONTH
State of the Organization
PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 UpdatePAGE 6
0 1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
PVT Room Nights by Month
2021 - 2025 *(Jan – Sept)
2021 - 23,229
2022 - 27,553
2023 - 38,132
2024 - 42,055
2025 - 40,902
*Sept YTD
PLACER VALLEY TOURISM ROOM NIGHTS BY MONTH
State of the Organization
PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 UpdatePAGE 7
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
PVT STR Occupancy by Month
2021 - 2025 * (Jan – Sept)
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
*Sept YTD
PAGE 8
To enhance hotel vitality and
attract overnight stays in the
cities of Roseville, Rocklin and
Lincoln through strategic
destination marketing.
To position Placer Valley
as a premier destination by
fostering strategic tourism
partnerships, sustainable
growth, and community
prosperity.
PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 Update
PVT Mission & Vision
OUR MISSIONOUR MISSION
OUR VISIONOUR VISION
PAGE 9
PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 Update
PVT Values
CollaborationCollaboration
PassionatePassionate
We build strong, cohesive relationships with key partners to enhance our region and achieve shared goals.
We love what we do and are dedicated to creating meaningful, positive experiences for our clients and visitors, leaving a lasting impression with every interaction.
DynamicDynamic
We embrace creative thinking and adaptability, approaching diverse tasks and challenges with innovative, sustainable solutions.
IntegrityIntegrity
We act with honesty and transparency, always prioritizing the trust and respect of our clients and visitors in every interaction.
Community StewardshipCommunity Stewardship
We aim to be responsible stewards of our region’s economic growth, fostering opportunities that strengthen our community for the future.
PAGE 10
Top 5 Priorities
Priority 1:Priority 1:
PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 Update
Priority 2:Priority 2:
Priority 3:Priority 3:
Priority 4:Priority 4:
Priority 5:Priority 5:
Maximize room night production for the Placer
Valley Soccer Complex through PVT-related
events
Placer Valley Soccer ComplexPlacer Valley Soccer Complex Ensure the ongoing sustainability and success
of @the Grounds while fostering continued
growth and development
@the Grounds@the Grounds
Identify and cultivate relationships with key
business and community partners, actively
seeking opportunities to collaborate and drive
positive impact
Partner Engagement andPartner Engagement and
AdvocacyAdvocacy
Plan for future projects and meet current
obligations while ensuring financial strength
and flexibility
Financial ResiliencyFinancial Resiliency
Strategic development of tourism-related
facilities is critical to driving hotel demand and
fostering economic growth
Tourism-Related FacilitiesTourism-Related Facilities
MAXIMIZE ROOM NIGHT PRODUCTION FOR THE PLACER VALLEY SOCCER COMPLEX THROUGH
PVT-RELATED EVENTS
PAGE 11 PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 Update
Refined Goals:
1. Increase room-night generating events during need periods
2. Strengthen partnerships with high-value event organizers
3. Grow event pipeline to support overall economic impact and visitor demand Tactics:
1. Continue to Secure Quality Events
2. Drive Sales Efforts
3. Expanded Marketing Outreach
4. Evaluation of Existing Events
Measurements of Success:
Accomplishments:
1. Met with 10 pre-qualified event organizations in 2025 ranging from sport types such as soccer, flag football, quadball who host a variety of competitions with a focus on state, regional and national style events.
2. Successfully booked 5 events (and more!) for 2026 including two in August and one in December which are typically slower months for Placer Valley hotels. Events range from soccer to quadball to flag football.
3. Enhanced Digital Marketing Efforts to Broaden Reach:
d. Two E-blasts created and distributed through Sports Destination Management e. Social media collaboration with City of Roseville Parks & Recreation Department for ongoing promotion of key project milestones including construction benchmarks and the Grand Opening.
Priority 1:
Placer Valley Soccer Complex
Measurements of Success:
1. Secure at least 1 event generating room nights during need periods such as Labor Day or Thanksgiving weekends
2. Increase total room nights from events by 20%
3. Grow event pipeline by 3 qualified leads by year-end
4. Establish 2 new high-value organizer partnerships
ENSURE THE ONGOING SUSTAINABILITY AND SUCCESS OF @THE GROUNDS WHILE
FOSTERING CONTINUED GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
PAGE 12 PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 Update
Priority 2:
@the Grounds
Goals:
1. Maximize room night production
2. Complete the Master Plan Expansion and Feasibility Study
3. Research and create awareness of potential opportunities and threats to facility Tactics:
4. Enhance Existing Events
5. Optimize Open/Available Weekends
6. Master Plan Expansion and Feasibility Study
7. SWOT Analysis
Accomplishments:
1. As of October Year-to-Date, events held at ATG generated a 21% increase in annual room night production, continually bringing growth year-over-year.
2. Completion of the ATG Master Plan Feasibility Study with broader understanding of next steps and desired timeline.
3. SWOT Analysis of Roebbelen Center completed showcasing the success of a unique building that athletes and families desire over any other facility in Northern California.
Measurements of Success:
1. 20% change in annual room night production
2. Explore environmental needs and funding analysis for master plan
3. Support growth of non-sports room night generation
IDENTIFY AND CULTIVATE RELATIONSHIPS WITH KEY BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY
PARTNERS, ACTIVELY SEEKING OPPORTUNITIES TO COLLABORATE AND DRIVE POSITIVE IMPACT
PAGE 13 PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 Update
Priority 3:
Partner Engagement and Advocacy
Goals:
1. Build and maintain strong relationships with key stakeholders in business, government, and community organizations
2. Foster collaborative partnerships that align with PVT goals and address community needs
3. Increase partner involvement in initiatives that drive tourism and economic growth
Tactics:
1. Stakeholder Mapping and Outreach
2. Collaborative Initiatives
3. Education and Advocacy
4. Awareness and Support
Accomplishments:
1. Increased attendance and participation at quarterly hotel mixers, creating a network of informed champions and hospitality stewards for the Placer Valley region.
2. Greater awareness of PVT initiatives, reflected in highest attendance ever at the annual PVT Client Appreciation and Awards banquet and official opening on the Placer County Fair.
3. As community awareness grows of PVT’s services and vision, the key relationships we have fostered with hoteliers, the community and businesses continue to bring new potential events to the footprint.
Refined Measurements of Success:
1. Continue hotel engagement programs
2. Create and establish an association membership targeted toward hospitality/tourism related businesses (restaurants, downtown associations, retail, etc.) with 12 new members in the first year
3. Increase partner participation (PVT events and regional, economic development, tourism related)
PLAN FOR FUTURE PROJECTS AND MEET CURRENT OBLIGATIONS WHILE ENSURING
FINANCIAL STRENGTH AND FLEXIBILITY
PAGE 14 PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 Update
Priority 4:
Financial Resiliency
Goals:
1. Ensure fiscal responsibility through robust budgeting, forecasting, and cost management
2. Build and sustain reserve funds to support long-term sustainability and unexpected needs
3. Maintain financial flexibility to adapt to changing economic conditions and evolving business needs
Tactics:
1. Ensure Adequate Reserves and Emergency Funds
2. Strong Financial Planning and Forecasting
3. Monitor and Adapt to Economic Trends
Accomplishments:
1. Application of Accrual Method of Accounting versus Cash Method ensuring PVT has a better, truer understanding of overall financial health for the organization. This will allow PVT a better understanding of long-term investments and funding strategies for future projects including a much- needed meeting venue.
2. Update accounting software to QuickBooks Online from QuickBooks Desktop, further ensuring
3. Following Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) has aligned our financial reporting and annual audit enabling annualized reporting requirements to be streamlined and more accurate.
Measurements of Success:Measurements of Success:
1. 1. Achieve and maintain approved budgets, with regular reviews and adjustments as needed to reflect Achieve and maintain approved budgets, with regular reviews and adjustments as needed to reflect changing circumstanceschanging circumstances
2. 2. Increase or maintain reserve fund levels in alignment with long-term sustainability goals and Increase or maintain reserve fund levels in alignment with long-term sustainability goals and organizational prioritiesorganizational priorities
3. 3. Implement conservative investment policies while maintaining high cash liquidity to ensure flexibility Implement conservative investment policies while maintaining high cash liquidity to ensure flexibility and readiness for new opportunities or challengesand readiness for new opportunities or challenges
STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM-RELATED FACILITIES IS CRITICAL TO DRIVING HOTEL
DEMAND AND FOSTERING ECONOMIC GROWTH
PAGE 15 PVT 5 Year Strategic Plan: Year 2 Update
Priority 5:
Tourism-Related Facilities
Refined Goals:
1. Ensure meeting venue needs are recognized and prioritized in planning and development
2. Advocate and promote the development of a diamond complex
3. Maintain awareness and inclusion in future development and renovation projects
Tactics:
1. Complete ATG Master Plan
2. Diamond Complex Awareness
3. Maintain Awareness and Inclusion on Future Development Projects
4. Community Engagement
Accomplishments:
1. ATG Master Plan Feasibility Study complete, showcasing the area’s desire for a conference center hotel and the ability of adding this new meeting venue to the ATG campus. While the Roebbelen Center continues to be a national draw to the campus, currently, expansion of that facility is not recommended.
Refined Measurements of Success:
1. Completion of ATG master plan and a defined roadmap for next steps
2. Increased marketing efforts on midweek business through PVT assets
3. SWOT Analysis of Placer Valley region
4. An updated and comprehensive list of ongoing and new development projects, including key contacts and timelines
@PLACERTOURISM
2024 Actual 2025 YE
Projection 2025 Budget 2026 Budget
Revenues
Net Hotel Assessments 2,188,670 2,322,516 133,846 6% 2,289,639 2,422,003 99,487 4% Other Revenues:
7000 · Interest Income 62,102 52,693 (9,409) -15% 12,900 50,000 (2,693) -5% 4010 · Contract Income - - - 0% - - 0% 4011 · Membership 6,000
4020 · Miscellaneous - - - 0% - - - 0% Subtotal 62,102 52,693 (9,409) -15% 12,900 56,000 (2,693) -5% TOTAL REVENUES 2,250,772 2,375,209 124,437 6% 2,302,539 2,478,003 96,794 4% Expenses
Projects:
6101 · Marketing 127,442 134,064 6,622 5% 144,520 133,000 (1,064) -1% 6106 · Tourism Study 12,733 12,770 37 0% 14,000 14,000 1,230 10% 6107 · Professional Development 14,069 7,721 (6,348) -45% 9,000 9,000 1,279 17% 6108 · Event Support 506,843 583,000 76,157 15% 460,000 510,000 (73,000) -13% 6113 · Board/Staff Development 15,148 15,595 446 3% 17,000 16,000 405 3% 6114 · Web Site 23,669 109,824 86,156 364% 93,000 30,000 (79,824) -73% 6115 · Community Events 59,438 65,670 6,232 10% 60,000 66,000 330 1% 6199 · Long Field Reimbursements 250,000 98,362 (151,638) -61% - - (98,362) -100% 6200 · Placer Valley Soccer Complex 50,000 250,000 200,000 400% 250,000 300,000 50,000 20% Total Projects 1,059,343 1,277,006 217,664 21% 1,047,520 1,078,000 (199,006) -16% Payroll Expenses:
6310-6320 · Salaries + Hourly Wages 353,707 375,826 22,119 6% 453,042 609,578 233,752 62% 6330-6340 · Payroll Taxes and W/C Insurance 37,215 44,331 7,116 19% 46,109 77,944 33,612 76% 6350 · Incentive 34,172 34,635 464 1% 43,750 48,975 14,340 41% 6360· Cell Phone Reimbursement - 600 600 0% - 1,800 1,200 200% 6370-6380 · Employee Benefits 60,345 84,454 24,109 40% 81,548 100,557 16,103 19% Total Payroll 485,438 539,847 54,409 11% 624,449 838,855 299,008 55% Placer Valley Tourism
2026 Budget
Variance to 2025 YE
Projection Variance to 2024
Placer Valley Tourism
2026 Budget
2024 Actual 2025 YE
Projection 2025 Budget 2026 Budget Variance to
2025 YE
Operations:
6510 · Common Area Maintenance/Assoc Dues 15,260 17,846 2,585 17% 16,924 19,800 1,954 11% 6515 · Janitorial/Maintenance 3,933 3,306 (627) -16% 5,824 4,750 1,445 44% 6520 · Office Supplies/Furniture 8,796 16,600 7,803 89% 15,328 11,200 (5,400) -33% 6525 · Utilities 6,141 6,368 227 4% 6,912 7,000 632 10% 6530 · Telephone 5,911 4,773 (1,138) -19% 6,363 5,000 227 5% 6535· Insurance-Liability/D&O 7,093 7,498 405 6% 7,802 8,700 1,202 16% 6540 · Postage and Delivery 317 551 234 74% 917 600 49 9% 6545 · Accounting and Payroll 4,545 5,085 540 12% 4,891 5,350 265 5% 6550 · Property Tax 8,279 8,978 699 8% 9,107 10,500 1,522 17% 6560 · Dues and Subscriptions 16,028 12,067 (3,962) -25% 13,151 12,500 433 4% 6570 · Professional Services 99,892 105,400 5,508 6% 105,353 39,000 (62,900) -60% 6576 · Travel 6,362 5,696 (666) -10% 8,000 6,500 804 14% 6577 · Meals & Entertainment 1,155 2,511 1,355 117% 1,800 2,750 239 10% 6580 · Audit Fee 2,757 17,700 14,943 542% 13,100 13,600 (4,100) -23% 6585 · City of Roseville Admin Fee 3,129 3,285 156 5% 3,285 3,500 215 7% 6595 · Research & Development 10,534 31,500 20,966 199% 31,500 30,000 (1,500) -5% 6599 · Miscellaneous Expense - 4,216 4,216 0% - 1,000 (3,216) -76% Total Operations 200,132 253,378 53,246 27% 250,257 181,750 (68,128) -27% SUBTOTAL EXPENSES 1,744,913 2,070,231 325,318 19% 1,922,226 2,098,605 31,874 2% Special Projects:
1711 · Major Projects - 43,510 43,510 0% 500,000 500,000 456,490 1049% 1712 · Major Projects Rollover 200,000 200,000 - 0% - 200,000 - 0% 2201 · Long Field Reimbursement 171,301 98,362 (72,939) -43% 171,267 - (98,362) -100% Total Special Projects 371,301 341,873 (29,429) -8% 671,267 700,000 358,127 105% Grand Total Expense 2,116,214 2,412,104 295,889 14% 2,593,493 2,798,605 390,001 16% Revenue Over Entire Expense 134,558 (36,894) (171,452) -127% (290,954) (320,602) (283,707) 769%
Variance to 2024
Placer Valley Tourism
2026 Budget
2024 Actual 2025 YE
Projection 2025 Budget 2026 Budget
Statistics
Hotel Assessments to PVT
Roseville 3,443,083 3,432,871 (10,212) 0% 3,473,709 3,501,528 68,657 2% Rocklin 674,402 704,555 30,153 4% 667,479 704,555 - 0% Lincoln 128,239 241,014 112,775 88% 206,375 273,514 32,500 13% Total 4,245,723 4,378,440 132,717 3% 4,347,563 4,479,597 101,157 2% Less Bond Payment 2,057,053 2,057,924 871 0% 2,057,924 2,057,594 (330) 0% Total 2,188,670 2,320,515 131,845 6% 2,289,639 2,422,003 101,488 4% Room Nights:
Roseville 529,705 528,134 (1,571) 0% 534,417 538,697 10,563 2% Rocklin 103,754 108,393 4,639 4% 103,071 108,393 - 0% Lincoln 19,729 37,079 17,350 88% 31,750 42,079 5,000 13% Total 653,188 673,606 20,418 3% 669,238 689,169 15,563 2% Comments
Variance to 2024 Variance to 2025 YE
Projection
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 2/18/2026
Item #: VI.2
File #: 0202
Item ID: 2026-9
Title: Audit Services Agreement
Contact: Teri Quinlan 916-774-5316 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approving an audit services agreement with CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP in the amount of $509,560 to provide financial auditing services for fiscal years 2025-26, 2026-27, and 2027-28. Funding for these services is included in the budgets of Finance; Parks, Recreation & Libraries; the Other Post-Employment Benefits Trust; Housing; Electric; the Roseville Natural Gas Finance Authority; Transit; Youth Development; the South Placer Wastewater Authority; and the Bizz Johnson Highway Interchange Joint Powers Authority.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution to approve an Audit Services Agreement with CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP, and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BACKGROUND
As stated in Article VII, Section 7.19 of the Roseville City Charter, the City Council is required to provide an annual audit of the City by an independent firm of certified public accountants with no connection to City government. The firm must comply with restrictions and limitations prescribed by state law. A comprehensive audit is conducted annually to verify whether the City’s financial transactions, accounts, and records comply with the City Charter, state and federal laws, and generally accepted accounting principles. The resulting audit report is submitted to the City Council and made accessible for public inspection.
In September 2025, the City issued a request for proposals and conducted a competitive procurement process to select a CPA firm. After reviewing the nine proposals received and conducting interviews, staff recommends engaging CliftonLarsonAllen LLP as the City’s new audit firm.
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of audit services is $160,260 for FY2025-26, $163,200 for FY2026-27, and $166,100 for FY2027-28, with a total not-to-exceed amount of $509,560, including funding for as-needed services during the term.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)). Approval of an audit services agreement meets the
above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
Respectfully Submitted,
Teri Quinlan, Accounting Manager
Scott Pettingell, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-036
2. Audit Services Agreement
REVIEWERS:
Teri Quinlan, Finance Department Created/Initiated - 1/30/2026 Scott Pettingell, Finance Department Approved - 2/3/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/3/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/3/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/3/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/3/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 2/4/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/4/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-036
APPROVING AN AUDIT SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE AND CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an Audit Services Agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and CliftonLarsonAllen LLP, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 2/18/2026
Item #: VI.3
File #: 0721-02 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-51
Title: Sierra Vista Specific Plan Grading of Bike Trail in FD-81 and FD-82A Project - New Capital Improvement Project Approval, Reimbursement Agreement, and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Suzanne Engelke 916-746-1289 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project and approval of a reimbursement agreement with John Mourier Construction, Inc. in the amount of $57,357 to provide grading of the multi-use trail in Parcels FD-81 and FD-82A in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan. Staff also recommends approval of a budget adjustment of $57,357 for the grading. Funding is available from bike trail development fees collected for the Sierra Vista Specific Plan. No General Fund resources will be used for this project.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project - Sierra Vista Specific Plan Grading of Bike Trail in FD-81 and FD-82A Project; and
2. Adopt a resolution to approve a Reimbursement Agreement with John Mourier Construction, Inc. and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
3. Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $57,357 for grading of the trail.
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the Sierra Vista Specific Plan and Development Agreement, the developer, John Mourier Construction, Inc., is responsible for rough grading a Class I trail within Parcels FD-81 and FD-82A. The developer is requesting reimbursement for this improvement, also pursuant to the Development Agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for rough grading the multi-use trail are available from bike trail development fees collected for the Sierra Vista Specific Plan. There is no impact on the General Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Development of the multi-use trail was previously evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), certified on May 19, 2010 and SCH NO - 2008032115 and identified in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan. Based on results of an initial study, construction of the bike trail is found to be within the project covered by the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Final EIR. As discussed in the Specific Plan EIR, the EIR provides environmental analysis of community infrastructure and facilities, including parks, pedestrian bridges, and bike trails, to the extent applicable. Because the project is consistent with the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Final EIR and Specific Plan, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented during the design and
construction of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan multi-use trail. Because the proposed project meets the requirements identified in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no additional CEQA review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Suzanne Engelke, Associate Transportation Planner
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Resolution 26-030
3. Reimbursement Agreement with JMC signed
4. Ordinance 7042
REVIEWERS:
Suzanne Engelke, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 1/21/2026 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 1/27/2026 Jason Shykowski, Public Works Department - All Approved - 1/28/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/3/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 2/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/5/2026
498-020-023
OPEN SPACE
76 72
73 74
Exhibit A
PARK
eeplant Street_ ..
71 70 69
• 73 72 'l1
68 FD-08
�
70 67
I
66 69
\.,
67 66 65 64
Atumroot Drive
BIKE PA 1H EJtH/Bf T
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE F'D-08
ClTY Of' ROSE111LLE PLACEII CO\m1Y CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 26-030
APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Reimbursement Agreement for the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Grading of Bike Trail in FD-81 and FD-82A Project, by and between the City of Roseville and John Mourier Construction, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Reimbursement Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 7042
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Grading of Bike Trail in FD-81 and FD-82A project.
SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 11/19/2025
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE:
PREPARER NAME & TITLE:
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
FISCAL YEAR:
ORDINANCE:
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
3319 6587 84001 500642 57,357 Establish Capital Outlay budget for Sierra Vista Specific Plan SVSP Grading project.
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 57,357
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 57,357
FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
3319 3601 00000 000000 (57,357) Decrease Neighborhood Park - Sierra Vista Fund Balance
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (57,357)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:
The Public Works Department recommends that Council authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – Sierra Vista Specific Plan SVSP Grading of Bike Trail in FD-81 and FD-82A Project (The "Project"), and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $57,357 from available resources in the Neighborhood Park Sierra Vista Fund (3319) to the Project for grading a segment of multi-use trail in parcels FD-81 and FD82A of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan.
Reimbursement will be made to John Mourier Corporation, Inc. (JMC) from developer-paid bike trail permit fees in the Neighborhood Park Sierra Vista Fund (3319). No General Fund monies will be used to construct this bike trail. 2025-26
Suzanne Engelke, Associate Transportation Planner
Kimberly Goulet, Acting Transportation Grants Analyst
Public Works / Alternative Transportation
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 2/18/2026
Item #: VI.4
File #: 0900-04-02
Item ID: 2026-40
Title: Roseville Parkway Widening Project — Adoption of Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Project Approval, Approval of Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Call for Bids Contact: Karen Vences 916-774-5412 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Roseville Parkway Widening Project, approval of the project described therein, approval of the plans and specifications for Roseville Parkway Widening Project - Phase 1, and authorization for staff to call for bids. The project scope of Phase 1 consists of widening portions of Roseville Parkway from West Drive to Creekside Ridge Drive and at the Pleasant Grove Boulevard intersection. Improvements also include modifications to existing traffic signals, sidewalks, curb and gutter, updated signing and striping, and necessary utility adjustments. The construction of the project is estimated to cost $3.5 million and will be primarily funded by the special tax revenue generated in the North Central Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1. No General Fund resources will be used for the project.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt the attached resolution adopting the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Roseville Parkway Widening Project;
2. Approve the project as described therein;
3. Approve the plans and specifications for Roseville Parkway Widening - Phase 1; and
4. Authorize staff to call for bids.
BACKGROUND
Roseville Parkway is a multi-lane arterial roadway providing a connection from North Roseville to South Roseville and Interstate 80. The number of lanes vary from two to three lanes. The Council-adopted North Central Roseville Specific Plan (NCRSP) Roadway Improvement Project combined improvements to widen Roseville Parkway from Creekside Ridge Drive to East Gibson Drive from three lanes to four lanes in each direction, and increase the number of left turn lanes from southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway from two to three lanes. This section of the Roseville Parkway corridor experiences heavy traffic congestion on a daily basis due in part to popular shopping and dining destinations in the area. Based on available funding, the NCRSP Roadway Improvement Project was divided into two phases, known as the Roseville Parkway Widening Project - Phase 1 (Phase 1) and the Roseville Parkway Widening Project - Phase 2.
Phase 1 includes:
• Adding a third left-turn lane on southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway;
• Extending the right turn lane on northbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard to eastbound Roseville Parkway;
• Adding a bus turnout on Roseville Parkway between West Drive and Reserve Drive; • Constructing intersection improvements at Roseville Parkway and Galleria Boulevard.
In addition, it includes modifications to existing traffic signals, sidewalks, curb and gutter, updated signing and striping, and necessary utility adjustments. Phase 1 of the project will incorporate improvements necessary for the ultimate roadway widening as originally described in the NCRSP Roadway Improvement Project, which will be completed in Phase 2 when funding becomes available.
Staff are currently working with property owners along Roseville Parkway to acquire necessary right-of- way for the project. Contingent on outstanding right-of-way acquisitions, staff expects to begin Phase 1 construction in the summer of 2026.
Public Outreach:
A range of public outreach and input occurred during the development of the project plans including a community open house on September 20, 2022 at the Catheryn Gates Elementary School.
The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Roseville Parkway Widening Project, was available for a review and comment period from March 8, 2024 through April 8, 2024. The environmental document was advertised:
• Via email newsletters;
• On the City's website; and
• Via a legal notice published in the March 8, 2024 edition of the Roseville Press Tribune.
These notices advised of the IS/MND availability and public comment period. Hard copies of the environmental document were made available at the Permit Center front counter and electronic copies were available via the City's web site.
A total of two comment letters were received. One from a resident and one from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. All comments are addressed in the Final Initial Study and are attached to this Council Communication.
Public Works staff will be working closely with the City's Public Affairs and Communications team to keep the community informed of the project's progress and traffic impacts during the two construction phases of the project. Staff will ensure residents and businesses are notified about the project benefits and construction impacts through a variety of methods that may include, but are not limited to: direct mail, signage, social media, web, and email notifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
The project (Phase 1) is anticipated to cost approximately $3.5 million. Construction of the project will be primarily funded from the special tax revenue generated in the North Central Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1. There is sufficient budget within the project to fund the estimated construction
costs. No General Fund resources will be used to complete the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (Subsequent ISMND, SCH No. 2024030290) were prepared for the Roseville Parkway Widening Project. The Subsequent ISMND includes mitigation to ensure protection of nesting migratory birds and roosting bats and to protect previously unidentified Tribal Cultural Resources. The City will implement these measures and all applicable Best Management Practices to ensure no adverse impacts on the environment would occur.
The Subsequent ISMND is attached to this Council Communication.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Karen Vences, Assistant Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-033
2. Final Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
3. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
4. Project Plans
5. Project Manual
6. Location Map
REVIEWERS:
Karen Vences, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Project's Created/Initiated - 1/28/2026 Jesse Khatkar, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Project's Approved - 1/28/2026 Noah Siviglia, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Project's Approved - 1/29/2026 Stefanie Kemen, Public Works Department - Administration Division Approved - 1/29/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/3/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/3/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 2/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/5/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-033
ADOPTING THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR THE ROSEVILLE PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT
WHEREAS, Roseville Parkway is a multi-lane arterial roadway providing a connection from North Roseville to South Roseville and Interstate 80; and
WHEREAS, the Council-adopted North Central Roseville Specific Plan (NCRSP) Roadway Improvement Project combined improvements to widen Roseville Parkway from Creekside Ridge Drive to East Gibson Drive from three lanes to four lanes in each direction, and increase the number of left turn lanes from southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway from two to three lanes; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared for the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Roseville Parkway Widening Project, was available for a review and comment period from March 8, 2024 through April 8, 2024; and
WHEREAS, two comment letters were received and are addressed in the Final Initial Study; and
WHEREAS, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15097, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) has been prepared to assist with the tracking and implementation of required mitigation measures; and
WHEREAS, the Initial Study conclusion is that with implementation of all mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND and MMRP, all potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant and an MND is proposed to satisfy CEQA requirements; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends adoption of the IS/MND and approval of the MMRP to satisfy the project’s CEQA requirements.
WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Project have been reviewed by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Roseville Parkway Widening Project is hereby adopted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Roseville Parkway Widening Project is hereby approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _____________________, 20___, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
SUBSEQUENT INITIAL
STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
ROSEVILLE PARKWAY WIDENING
PROJECT
P R E P A R E D F O R:
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Contact: Jessica Lynch
916.774.5352
P R E P A R E D B Y:
ICF
980 9th Street, Suite 1200
Sacramento, CA 95814
Contact: Susan Bushnell-Bergfalk
916.231.7687
June 2024
ICF. 2024. Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project. June. (ICF 103175.) Roseville, CA. Prepared for City of Roseville, CA.
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project i June 2024
ICF 103175
Contents
List of Tables ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ iii List of Figures................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... iv List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................ ................................ ..................... iv Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Description ................................ ................................ ...1-1 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 1-1 Prior CEQA Documentation ................................ ................................ ......................... 1-3 Project Location and Existing Conditions ................................ ................................ ..... 1-3 Project Purpose and Need ................................ ................................ ........................... 1-7 Project Description ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 1-7 Road Improvements ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 1-7 Traffic Signal Improvements ................................ ................................ ........................ 1-9 Utility Relocations ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 1-9 Right-of-Way Acquisition ................................ ................................ ........................... 1-10 Equipment and Material Staging Areas................................ ................................ ...... 1-10 Earthwork and Grading ................................ ................................ .............................. 1-12 Construction Traffic Control ................................ ................................ ....................... 1-12 Project Schedule ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 1-12 Best Management Practices ................................ ................................ ...................... 1-12 City of Roseville Mitigating Ordinances, Guidelines, and Standards ....................... 1-15 Required Approvals ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 1-15 Consultation with California Native American ................................ ................................ .. 1-15 Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist ................................ ................................ .......................2-1 Earlier Analysis ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 2-4 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ................................ ................................ ....... 2-5 Determination ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 2-5 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ................................ ................................ ................ 2-6 I. Aesthetics ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 2-8 II. Agricultural and Forestry Resources ................................ ................................ ...... 2-11 III. Air Quality ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 2-14 IV. Biological Resources ................................ ................................ ............................ 2-23 V. Cultural Resources ................................ ................................ ................................ 2-31 VI. Energy ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 2-36 VII. Geology and Soils ................................ ................................ ............................... 2-38 VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................ ................................ ............... 2-45 IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ................................ ................................ ....... 2-48 X. Hydrology and Water Quality................................ ................................ ................. 2-53
City of Roseville
Contents
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project ii June 2024
ICF 103175
XI. Land Use and Planning ................................ ................................ ........................ 2-58 XII. Mineral Resources ................................ ................................ .............................. 2-60 XIII. Noise ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 2-62 XIV. Population and Housing ................................ ................................ ..................... 2-70 XV. Public Services ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 2-72 XVI. Recreation ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 2-75 XVII. Transportation ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 2-77 XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources................................ ................................ ................. 2-83 XIX. Utilities and Service Systems ................................ ................................ ............. 2-87 XX. Wildfire ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 2-91 XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................ ................................ ... 2-93 Appendix A Right-of-Way Exhibit
Appendix B Construction Assumptions
Appendix C Traffic Evaluation Memorandum
Appendix D Comments Received
Appendix E Response to Comments
City of Roseville
Contents
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project iii June 2024
ICF 103175
Tables
Table 1-1. Project Construction Phase 1 ................................ ................................ ................ 1-10 Table 1-2. Permits and Approvals Needed for the Project ................................ ...................... 1-15 Table 2-1. Estimated Unmitigated Criteria Pollutant Emissions from Project Construction (pounds per day) ................................ ................................ ................... 2-16 Table 2-2. Conservative Estimate of Increased Regional Health Effect Incidence Resulting from Construction of the Project (cases per year) ................................ ....... 2-19 Table 2-3. CO Concentrations at Roseville Parkway and Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Gibson Drive, and Galleria Boulevard (parts per million) ................................ ............ 2-20 Table 2-4. Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Project Construction (metric tons per year) ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 2-46 Table 2-5. Predicted Noise Levels from Typical Construction Equipment ............................... 2-63 Table 2-6. Predicted Existing Noise Levels Within the Project Alignment ............................... 2-63 Table 2-7. Modeled Construction Nosie Results for Each Phase ................................ ........... 2-64 Table 2-8. Proposed General Plan Update 60 dBA, 65 dBA, and 70 dBA Ldn Traffic Contours for Unconstrained Buildout ................................ ................................ .......... 2-66 Table 2-9. Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment ................................ ............. 2-67 Table 2-10. Intersection Level of Service Criteria ................................ ................................ ... 2-79
City of Roseville
Contents
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project iv June 2024
ICF 103175
Figures
Page
Figure 1-1. Project Location ................................ ................................ ................................ .....1-2 Figure 1-2. General Plan Lane Increases ................................ ................................ .................1-5 Figure 1-3. Roseville Parkway Improvements ................................ ................................ ..........1-8 Figure 1-4. Project Phasing ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 1-11
City of Roseville
Contents
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project v June 2024
ICF 103175
Acronyms and Abbreviations
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials AB Assembly Bill
B.P. Before Present
BMP best management practices
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Cal-OSHA California Occupational Safety and Health Administration Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CARB California Air Resources Board
CBC California Building Code
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CH4 methane
CHRIS California Historic Resources Information System Center CIP Capital Improvement Program
City City of Roseville’s
CMS changeable message sign
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CNPS California Native Plant Society
CO carbon monoxide
CO2 carbon dioxide
CRHR California Register of Historical Resources
dB decibels
dBA A-weighted decibels
DBH diameter at breast height
DPM diesel particulate matter
DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control
EO Executive Order
Farmland Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance
FTA Federal Transit Administration
GHG greenhouse gas
GPU EIR 2035 General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report HCM Highway Capacity Manual
IPaC Information, Planning, and Conservation System
IS/MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
ITS Intelligent Transportation System
Ldn day-night average sound level
Leq equivalent continuous sound level
LID low-impact development
LOS level of service
MRF Materials Recovery Facility
MTP Metropolitan Transportation Plan
N2O nitrous oxide
City of Roseville
Contents
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project vi June 2024
ICF 103175
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NCRSP North Central Roseville Specific Plan
NOA naturally occurring asbestos
NOX nitrogen oxides
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
OPR Office of Planning and Research
PCAPCD Placer County Air Pollution Control District
PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric Company
PM10 particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter PM2.5 particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter PPV Peak Particle Velocity
project Roseville Parkway Widening Project
RCNM Roadway Construction Noise Model
RMC Roseville Municipal Code
ROG reactive organic gases
ROW right-of-way
SACOG Sacramento Area Council of Governments
SB Senate Bill
SCH State Clearinghouse
SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy
SFNA Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area
SMAQMD Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District’s SMARA Surface Mining and Reclamation Act
SPCCP Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan ST Short-Term
SWPPP stormwater pollution prevention plan
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TAC toxic air contaminants
THRIS Tribal Historic Information System
TMP Transportation Management Plan
UAIC United Auburn Indian Community
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
VdB vibration decibels
VMT vehicle miles traveled
Williamson Act California Land Conservation Act of 1965
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-1 June 2024
ICF 103175
Chapter 1
Introduction and Project Description
Introduction
This Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) addresses the potential environmental impacts of the City of Roseville’s (City’s) proposed Roseville Parkway Widening Project (project) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City, as CEQA Lead Agency, proposes to widen sections of an approximate 1.5-mile segment of Roseville Parkway, generally between Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Gibson Drive, and Creekside Ridge Drive consistent with the City’s Transportation System Capital Improvement Program (Figure 1-1). The project would widen Roseville Parkway from three lanes to four lanes in each direction. The westbound direction would be widened between Creekside Ridge Drive and Gibson Drive (east). The eastbound direction would be widened between Reserve Drive and Creekside Ridge Drive. The project would also include constructing triple left-turn lanes on southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway, triple lefts from northbound Galleria Boulevard to westbound Roseville Parkway, and minor widening along the west side of Galleria Boulevard north of Roseville Parkway. The northbound right-turn lane on the east side of Pleasant Grove Boulevard, south of Roseville Parkway, would be extended by the project so that it runs the length between Pioneer Road and Roseville Parkway.
Roseville Parkway between Gibson Drive and Creekside Ridge Drive is a six-lane arterial roadway and is located in the North Central Roseville Specific Plan (NCRSP). This section of Roseville Parkway experiences heavy traffic congestion on a daily basis due in part to popular shopping and dining destinations and Class A office buildings in the area. Westfield Galleria at Roseville is an upscale indoor shopping mall located on the northwest corner of Roseville Parkway and Galleria Boulevard. The Ridge at Creekside/Creekside Town Center and The Fountains at Roseville are outdoor malls home to higher-end chain retailers and eateries and are located on the northeast and southwest corners of Roseville Parkway and Galleria Boulevard, respectively. There are also many Class A office buildings nearby—specifically on Creekside Ridge Drive, Reserve Drive, and Gibson Drive. The intersection of Pleasant Grove Boulevard and Roseville Parkway also experiences heavy traffic congestion as it is a primary travel route to the shopping and dining destinations and Class A office buildings listed above.
The City held a community open house on September 20, 2022, at the Catheryn Gates Elementary School in Roseville, the purpose of which was to share information and receive input from community members on the project. The open house presented the project background and schedule and provided an opportunity for the community to provide feedback on specific intersection designs identified on the project’s route. Representatives from the City and the project consultant team were available to discuss the project and answer questions. Postcards were mailed to all residents of the neighborhood adjacent to Roseville Parkway. In addition, notification fliers were shared with about 25 businesses in the area to post publicly. The flier was also sent via email to vicinity businesses, community groups, neighborhood associations, and interested individuals. In addition to verbal feedback and questions during the open house, two community members submitted feedback via comment cards during the open house. One expressed appreciation for the event, while the other raised a concern regarding how traffic would be diverted during construction.
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│
―│ ―│
―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│ ―│
. .
..
.. ..... ..
. .
.
.
... ....
.
.
.
. . ..
.
.. .
....
.
. .
...
.
. ...... ..
...
.
.
. . .
..
..
. ...
.
..
. ..
.
.
.
.. .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
..
.... .
...
. ..
.
.
. ... ..
.
..
.
.
.
.
...
..
......
. .... ...
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.... ..
.. .. . .... .. ... ..
.....
.
.
.
.
. .
...
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
. .
.
.
.
. .
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.. ..
..
.
.. .
.
.
..
... . .
... .
.
.
.
. .
.
.. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
. .
.
.
.
..
.
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
..
. .
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
..
. .
.
.
.
.. .
. ..
.
.
.
.
..
..
.
. .
.
. .
.
.. .
.
.
..
.
.
. .
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
. .
.
..
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
. .
.
.
..
.
.
..
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... ..
.. .
. .. .
.
.
..
. .
.. .
. . ..
.
.
. ..
. . .
.
. .
.. .
. .
.
.
.
.
. ...
.. .
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.. .
.
.. ..
....
.
.
.
.
..
. .
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
... .
.
...
.
.
. .. .
.
.. . ... .
.
.
.
.
.
. ... . ..
.... .
. .
. ...
.... .
. .
.
.
.
.
.. .
.
. .
. .
.
.. ..
. .
.
..
. ..
. .
.
.
.
.
.. . .
.
.
. .
.
.
... .
. .
.
. .
.
.
.
. .. ...
..
...
.
. .
.
... ... .
..
.
..
.
...
..
. .. .
.. ..
.
.
. ... ..
.
.
. ..
.
...
...
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
....
.
. .
.
.
.
. . .
.
.
.
...
.
..
...
.
.
.
.
.
.. ..
.
.. ..
.. .
.
.
.
. .
..
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
. .
. ..
.
.
. .. ..
...
.. ..
.
.
..
.
..
.
. ..
.
.
.. ..
..
...
. .
.
.
.
.
.. .
.... .
..
.
.
.
.... .
.. .
. .
... .
.
.
. .....
.
.
. ..
. ..
.
.
.
.. . ...
.. .
.. ...
.
.
.
.
. .
.. . .
... .
. .
.
.
.. . .
.
..
.
.
.
. .. .. .
. ...
.. .
.. . .
... .
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
...
....
. .
.. ..
.
... .
.
. . .
.
.
. . .
.. .
.
.
. . .
..
.
.
.
.
. ..... .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.... ..
. .
.. .. .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.. .. .
.
..
.
. .
.
.. ..
.. .
.
...
..
...
...
. .
.. .
.. .
. ... .
.
. . .. .... ..
.
... .
..
.
.
.
. .
. .. .. ..
..
.
.
.. ..
...
.
.
.
..
.
..
..
.
. .
. .
.
.
.
.
.
. ....
.
..
.
.. ..
.
.
.
.
. .. .
. .. .
.
. .
.
....
.
.
..
.
. .
.
..
...
. .
.
... ..
.
.
..
. .. .... .....
.
.
.
.
.. ..
.
..
.. . ..
..
.. ..
.. ..
.. ..
.
. .
. .. .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
. ...
..
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.. ..
.
.
..
..
.
.
..
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.. .
.
.
.
.
..
..
...
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.. ..
.
. .
..
.. .
. ..
. .
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
..
. .
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
..
.
. ..
.
.
.
. . ..
.
..
.
.
.
. ..
.
. .
.
.
.
..
.
. .
.
.
.
..
..
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
....
.
.
.. ... ...
. ..
.. ..
.
. .
.. .
.
.
. .
.
..
.
.
.
..
..
..
.
. ..
..
.
.
..
..
.
.
.
.
.. .
. . ...
. .
.
.
. .... .
..
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
..
.. .
.
.
.
.. .
.. .
..
.....
...
. ... .
....
. .
... .
.
.
.
.. ....
..
...
... .
.. .
.
.
.
. . ...
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
. .
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
. ...
.
... . .
... ..
.. .
. ...
..
..
.. .
. . .
. .. .
.. .. .
. .
. .
.
.
..
. ...
.
. . ..
...
... ...
.
. . ..
.
..
..
.
.. .
.
.
..
...
..
.
. .
. .
. . .
.
.
.
. ..
... ..
. . .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.. ..
..
. ..
.
.
..
.. ..
.
.
.
.
.
..
..
..
.
.
.
.. ..
.
.
...
.
... .
.
.....
.
.
..
.
. .
.. ..
... .
. .
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.. . ..
.
.... .
. .. ..
... ...
.
..
.. .
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
.
.. .
. .
..
.
..
.
.
. .
. .
... ..
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
. .
.
.. ..
.
.
..
. .
. .. .
.
.
..
.. .
.
.
..
.
.
.
. .. ..
.
... ..
......
.
.
..
. ... .
.
... .
.
..
. . ..
.
.
.
.. .
.
.
. .. .. ..
.
..
.
.
.
.. ..
.
.
.
.
.. .
.
..
...
.
.. .
...
.. ..
. .. .
.
...
.
...
.
..
. ... .
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
....
..
..
. ..
..
. ...
.
..
. .
....
. ... ..
.. ..
.
... ..
.
.
.
.
.. . .
. . .. .
.
. .
.
.
.
. .
.
. .
. . .
..
.
.
.
.. . .
.
.
.
.
.. .
. .
.
...
.
... .
... .
.
. .
.
.. .
.
..
.
.
.
.. .
.
..
. .
..
. .
..
... .. .
... ... .
.
..
.
.
.
.
..
.
. .. .. ..
...
.
...
..
.
.. . .. .. . ...
.
..
.
.
.
.
. .
.
. ..
.
. .
.
...
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
. .
..
.
.
.. .
..
. .
. .
.
. ...
..
.
..
.
.
. .
.
. . ....
..
..... ..
. ...
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
..
.
.
. .
...
..
.
..
.. .
.
..
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.. ..
.
.
..
..
... .. .
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
..
. .
.
. ..
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
. . ..
.
.
..
. .....
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
.
.
.. .
...
. .
..
..
. .
.
.
..
...
. ..
. .
.. .
.
..
....
.. .
.. .
. .
..
..
.
.
.
. ... ..
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
.
.
.. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
..
. ..
. .
.
.
.
.
.. . .
. .. .
.
..
.
.
...
..
.. . .
... ..
.
.
.. .. .
.
..
.
. . .
.
.. . ...
. .
.
.. .
.
. .. ..
... .
..
.
..
.
.
... ..
..
. ...
. .
...
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
... ...
.. .
.
.. .. .
.. .
..
.
....
.
..
.
. .. ..
..
.
.
.
. .
..
.
.
.
.
.. ...
... ..
... .
..
.
.
.
.. .
...
.
.. .
....
..
.
. . ..
.
. .
.
....
. .
.
.
. .
..
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
..
..
.
..
. .
.
..
....
.
...
.. ... .
.
.
.
..
.. . ...
..
. .
.
..
. .
. .
.
.
.
. .
. .
.. ..
.. .. .
.. .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.....
. ....
......
.
.
.
.. .
.
..
..
.
. ...
.. .
.
. ..
.
.
.
. .
.
. .
.
.
.. .. ...
.
..
...
. ..
.
.
.
..
.
.
....
. ....
.. ..
..
. ..
.
..
. .
..
. .
.
.
.
.
...
.
..
.
.
..
.
...
.....
.
.
. ...
.
.
..
..
.. ..
.
..
. .
.
....... .
.
.
.. .
. .
.. .
. .
.
...
.
.
..
. ....
.
.
..
. ..
.
.. .. ..
.
.
. .
.
.
.
...... .
.. ..
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○ ○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
E'
○
○
○
○
○
○
››
!"
&PO&PO
^
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄ÞÞ@TT
▄ÞÞ@TT
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
▄n
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
H
100
100
400
100
150
350
100
200
200
350
350
150
350
100
100
150
200
200
100
200
200
300
200
150
150
100
350
200
400
100
200
250
250
100
200
100
250
200
200
250
150
150
300
150
250
150
150
150
350
150
300
150
100
200
150
150
150
300
100
250
300
150
150
250
250
150
150
300
150
100
150
100
100
400
100
100
150
150
200
150
200
250
300
200
100
200
200
100
150
150
100
100
300
150
200
250
350
150
150
150
300
200
250
150
250
150
BLANCHARD DR
BIG BEND DR
PLEASANTGROVEBL
N HARDING BLVD
SUNSET BL
W STANFORD RANCH RD
BRIARCLIFFLN
SANTA
INEZ
ST
TOPAZ
AVE
TURNSTONE WAY
LUDLOW
DR
CRATERLAKE
DR
STONE PINELN
BLACK
BEAR
ST
MOON
D
ANCER CIR
DEREKPL
SHASTA ST
N
SUNRISE
AVE
GREY BUNNY DR
LINCOLN ST
W RANCH VIEW DR
S WHITNEY BLVD
IROQUOIS RD
PARKSIDE WAY
MARKET ST
FIRESTONE
DR
LONGSPUR LOOP
BICKLEIGH
LOOP
PINESCHI PL
FALLEN LEAF LN
W
INDING
CREEK
RD
AVONDALE DR
PARAGON ST
N HARDING
BLVD
WINDHAM WAY
ROSESTONE LN
ANGUS RD
NORTHPARK DR
STONEY
CROSS
LN
SANTE FE WAY
MISTY WOOD DR
ATLANTIC ST
E LINCOLN PW
MANZA CI
CORONADO AVE
AMBRIDGE DR
SPARTA CT
VILLA SERENA CIR
E CATLETT RD
HORNCASTLE AVE
MAIN ST
¬«65
KENWOOD WAY
OLD HWY 65
OAKS BL
¬«65
OAK GROVE DR
BLAYDON RD
FUHRMANWAY
ANVIL CIR
GLENBROOK LN
AVON RD
BLUE OAKS BLVD
CHILTON DR
LORIMER WAY
FOLSOM
RD
MINORS CIR
EASTWOOD DR
LOCKTON DR
CORTINA
CIR
ROSE CREEK RD
TAHOE AVE
HILLCREST
RD
HERITAGE
DR
ATHENS AVE
KINGFISHER LN
JUNCTION BLVD
SIERRA BLVD
YUMA WAY
GREEN
GROVE
LN
BOTTLEBRUSH
CIR
ROAD RU NNER
DR
KIRKHILL DR
NIBLICK DR
PAR PL
EVERGREEN DR
DEVONPORT LOOP
FERRARI RANCH RD
SOUTHCREEK DR
SPOTTED PONY LN
PHEASANT WAY
FIVE STAR BLVD
PRAIRIE VIEW LN
BRADBORNE DR
PARK DR
OMEGA WAY
CAMEO DR
¬«65
¬«65
GRIDER DR
PLEASANT ST
PINNACLES DR
SUMMIT DR
ARTISAN CI
§¨¦80
FOOTHILLS BLVD
SEVILLA DR SAMMY WAY
OPAL DR
ACTON WAY
CAMDEN RD
BOB DOYLE DR
CANEVARI DR
TAYLOR RD
JOINER PKWY
LAVASTONE DR
JUNCTION BLVD
DANIELLE DR
ELLESMERE
LOOP
DEL WEBB BLVD
¬«65
CASTLEBERRY LN
CRESCENT DR
TREASURE LN
OLD RANCHHOUSE
RD
AINSDALE DR
SHELTON ST
CULPEPPERLN
COPPERVALE CIR
BUTANO
W
AY
PERDITA LN
CLL LAS CASAS
BLUE LN
LETTERKENNY LN
PLEASANT GROVE BLVD
E
LINCOLN
PKW
Y
TERRACE DRW O ODHAV
ENCIR
LONGFE LLOW CIR
ANTELOPE CREEK DR
PEBBLESTONE LN
FAIRWAY DR
CHARTERRD
CASTERBR
IDGE DR
MANZANITA AVE
BURNT CEDAR WAY
BARONIAL LN
SUNSET BLVD
REDWOOD DR
FARMGATE
LN
HILLSDALE
LN
ORCHARD VIEW RD
DURANTA ST
GALLERIACI
SAN
ESTEBAN
CIR
MOUNTAINGATE DR
ABILENE CIR
COLDWATER LN
CIRCUIT DR
SORRELL CIR
STONECRESTLN
HIAWATHA DR
INDUSTRIAL AVE
KASEBERG DR
COLONNADE
DR
SAWTELL RD
HILLWOOD LOOP
BERRY ST
LOON LAKE ST
NICKLAUSCIR
PEBBLEBEACH RD
MAPLE CREEK DR
KRPAN
DR
OLD HWY 65
SUN
CITY
BLVD
BUNTING LN
BLUE OAKSBL
BLUE
OAKS
BLVD
TIMBERROSE
WAY
ALBATROSS WAY
BARN
VALLEY
LN
MONUMENT DR
NELSON LN
ROSEVILLE PKWY
W
ESLEY
RD
LAWTON AVE
SORRENTO PKWY
CRESTFIELD
CIR
BROKEN RAIL LN
G
OL D CIR
CAMERO
DR
VILLAGEGREENDR
WHITNEY RANCH PKWY
MONTEVERDE DR
DULUTH AVE
FIG ST
DICKINSON DR
DREAMGARDEN LOOP
SPRINGVIEW
DR
MORELLACIR
STONERIDGE BL
AVE
M
ARTINA
STONERIDGE BLVD
HALLISSEY DR
BASE LINE RD
AUTOMALLDR
MERIDIAN WAY
STANFORD RANCH RD
GINGERSNAP
LN
REVERE
DRCARAGH
ST
LOST LAKE LN
OAKVALLEY DR
LITTLE ROCK RD
FOX HOLLOW WAY
HILMERTONCIR HANISCH DR
DIAMOND WOODS CIR
N STAR ST
GRAND
PHEASANT
LN
SECRET LAKE LOOP
RESERVEDR
WINDING WAY
IVY ARBOR LN
LIVERPOOL LN
MIDAS AVE
RIVER RUN CIR
CAMP WHITNEY CIR
BELLA BREEZE DR
ESKATON LOOP
LAPORTE
DR
WILD PLAINS CIR
PORTER DR
MILLPORT DR
LEAD HILL BLVD
SHROPSHIRE ST HOVEY WAY
CAM
CAPISTRANO
W
OODCREEK
OAKS BL
VD
N
HAYDEN
PKW
Y
EQUINOX LOOP
CROCKER
LN
FIDDYM
ENT
RD
SCEPTREDR
SUMMERHILL LN
ATWELL ST
EAGLES PEAK LN
GIBSON DR
HAMERSLEY
LN
MARY ROSELN
FIFTEEN MILE DR
BREEN
DR
OAKBOROUGHAVE
AMETHYST
DR
DEVON DR
CORIN DR WHISTLESTOP WAY
HANCOCK DR
BLACK HAWK LN
MENLO DR
LAFAYETTE DR
PORTER DR
WHITNEY RANCH PKWY
DIAMOND OAKS RD
WEATHERVANE WAY
ARNOLD
DR
WILDCAT BLVD
FIELDSTONE DR
GOFOR BROKERD
ALBERTON
CIR
CINCINNATI AVE
FIDDYMENT RD
DAPPLE DAWN LN
BARNHILL LN
CENTRAL AVE
DEERFIELD CIR
HIDDEN HILLS LN
FIDDYMENT RD
HOMEWOOD LN
CUSHENDALL
DR
WOODGATE WAY
FIREFLY GREEN LN
STEINBECK DR
WALDEN VIEW LN
LAURELHURST
LN
KNIGHTSWAY
CARDINAL DR
STANSBURY LN
TALM
ONT
CIR
CALDARELLA CIR
EM
ERALD
DR
S BLUFF DR
SPRING
VALLEYPKWY
SCHOOL HOUSE LN
PRESTON
CIR
BLUE OAKS BLVD
HACKBERRY LN
KINGSW
OOD
DR
BIG BEARDR
W
HITNEY
OAKS
DR
SUNNINGDALE
DR
UNION ST
RANCH VIEW DR
EUREKA RD
MAGNOLIA LN
ANDOVER LN
SIOUX
ST
MCRAE WAY
EASTRIDGE DR
ENCHANTED CIR
BLUE HERON LOOP
LANDMARK
CIR
DEL
W
EBB
BLVD
AVE ALVARADO
LADERA
DR
SUNSET BLVD W
BRICK MASON CIR
ELEFA ST
ATHERTON RD
MARKET ST
TWELVE BRIDGES DR
LONETREE BLVD
MCNALLY DR
WAKE FIELD DR
ASHTON DR
COURTYARDSLOOP
UNIVERSITY
AVE
INDUSTRIAL
AVE
TREHOWELL DR
STAGECOACH CIR
VINE
CIR
MAYHILL DR
W SUNSET BLVD
PEBBLE
CREEK
DR
BETTENCOURT DR
W
YCKFORD
BLVD
COUNTRY
CLUB
DR
VICTORYLN
GALILEE RD
GRAND CANYON DR
OLD COACH DR
OUTLOOK DR
HIGHLAND PARK DR
W
ASHINGTON
BLVD
SUMMERLAND WAY
SUTTER
VIEW
LN
¬«65
CAMERON
DR
CARNELIAN CT
GOOSE MEADOWS WAY
INGRAM
PKW
Y
CASSIA WAY
WESTVIEW
DR
STEPPING STONELN
BRIDDLEWOOD DR
PLEASANT GROVE BLVD
W
HITNEY
BLVD
TW
ELVE
BRIDGES
DR
LINCOLN
AVE
ANTRIM
DR
SWINDON RD
PROVIDENCE WAY
HAYDEN PKWY
BRENNENCIR
N
SUNRISEAVE
ROSEGARDEN
LN
SAINT
BASIL CIR
MOORE RD
SNAPDRAGON LN
LONETREE
BL
CALEDON CIR
GROVELAND
LN
FIDDYMENT RD
PAINTED PONY LN
BUCKSKIN
LN
GRANITE LN
PHILLIP RD
CROCKER
RANCH RD
MARBLETHORPE DR
PILGRIMS DR
BADOVINAC DR
NORTHFIELD
LN
FARRIER
RD
GROUSERUN
CIR
CARGILL
WAY
SEYMOUR
CIR
MARCIA WAY
SIENNALOOP
GREATFIELD DR
AMERICANADR
BRENTFORD
CIR
SUN CITY BLVD
DEL WEBB BL
LONG CREEK WAY
BASE LINE RD
NICHOLS DR
RAINIER AVE
FOOTHILLS BLVD N
GROVE ST
NAVAJO DR
QUAILS NEST ST
ELM ST
W OAKS BLVD
FOOTHILLS BLVD
DESTINY DR
LONGTREE BLVD
SUNSET BLVD
REGENT CIR
¬«65
§¨¦80
Pleasant Grove Cr
Ingram Slough
Ingram Slough
Orchard Cr
Pleasant Grove Cr
Ingram Slough
Orchard Cr
Orchard Cr
S Br PleasantGroveCr
Kaseberg
Cr
OrchardCr
Ingram Slough
Dry Cr
Pleasant Grove Cr
IngramSlough
AntelopeCr
Heald College
- Roseville
Roseville Cem
William
Jessup Univ
Secret Ravine
Auburn
Ravine
ROCKLIN
Whitney
Miners Ravine
LINCOLN
Central Valley
Sierra
Vista
Bridge
Telegraph
Hill
ROSEVILLE
Sacramento
Valley
Miners Ravine
LINCOLN
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
ROSEVILLE QUADRANGLE
CALIFORNIA - PLACER COUNTY
7.5-MINUTE SERIES
ROSEVILLE, CA
2018
Expressway Local Connector
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Ramp 4WD
Secondary Hwy Local Road
Interstate Route State RouteUS RouteWX ./ H
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
This map was produced to conform with the
National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.
A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.18 CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
SCALE 1:24 000
1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
21KILOMETERS00.51
1 0.5 0
MILES
1 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 FEET
×
Ù
GN
MN
1°3´
19 MILS
13°36´
242 MILS
UTM GRID AND 2017 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
43 00
FJ
FH
Grid Zone Designation
10S
U.S. National Grid
100,000 - m Square ID
CALIFORNIA
1 Sheridan
8 Folsom
2 Lincoln
3 Gold Hill
4 Pleasant Grove
5 Rocklin
6 Rio Linda
7 Citrus Heights
ADJOINING QUADRANGLES
76 3
8 2
4 1
5 Imagery.....................................................NAIP, July 2016 - October 2016 Roads......................................... U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 Names............................................................................GNIS, 1981 - 2017 Hydrography...............................National Hydrography Dataset, 2003 - 2016 Contours............................................National Elevation Dataset, 2003 - 2013 Boundaries..............Multiple sources; see metadata file 2016 - 2017 Public Land Survey System................................................BLM, 2018 Wetlands.................FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1984 - 1987 North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and
1 000-meter grid:Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 10S Produced by the United States Geological Survey
This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before entering private lands.
*7643016357561*
NSN. 7 6 4 3 0 1 6 3 5 7 5 6 1
NGA REF NO. U S G S X 2 4 K 3 8 6 3 2
3,0001,000 Feet0
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 Mile
2,000 4,000 5,000
1.0 6,000
Scale = 1:24,000
Base Map: US Topo 7.5' series Roseville, California quadrangle (2018) Project Location
GALLERIA BLVD
Graphics … 103175 (01-19-2023) JC
Figure 1-1
Project Location
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-3 June 2024
ICF 103175
Prior CEQA Documentation
The project is identified and analyzed in the City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report (GPU FEIR) (State Clearinghouse [SCH] 2019080418) (City of Roseville, Certified August 5, 2020). The GPU FEIR identifies the addition of two travel lanes (one in each direction) to Pleasant Grove Boulevard generally between Foothills Boulevard and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard (Figure 1-2). However, the GPU FEIR did not identify or include analysis of project-related striping and turn lane modifications proposed west of Woodcreek Oaks and east of Foothills Boulevard. This IS/MND is a Subsequent CEQA document based largely on information contained in the GPU FEIR and evaluates the project in its entirety and not just the project modifications not previously included in the GPU FEIR.
The City’s evaluation of the potential effects of the project modifications follows the approach provided in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, and as interpreted and described by the California Supreme Court. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 was validated by the California Supreme Court in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College District (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937 as applying to MNDs. In that decision, the Court further held that “when there is a change in plans, circumstances, or available information after a project has received initial approval, the agency's environmental review obligations ‘turn on the value of the new information to the still pending decision making process.’ (Marsh v.
Oregon Natural Resources Council (1989) 490 U.S. 360, 374 [104 L. Ed. 2d 377, 109 S. Ct. 1851] (Marsh).) If the original environmental document retains some informational value despite the proposed changes, then the agency proceeds to decide under CEQA's subsequent review provisions whether project changes will require major revisions to the original environmental document because of the involvement of new, previously unconsidered significant environmental effects.”
Chapter 2, Environmental Checklist, describes the current environmental baseline conditions for the project and analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project modifications. The analysis first summarizes the GPU FEIR impact findings applicable to the project. This is followed by analysis of whether the project would result in a new significant impact, substantially more severe impact, a less-than-significant impact with additional mitigation, or no new impact compared to that disclosed in the GPU FEIR. The Initial Study checklist in Chapter 2 has been modified to be consistent with these impact determinations. All pertinent mitigation measures identified in the 2035 GPU FEIR will be applied to the subsequent project. In addition, where new potential impacts or substantially greater impacts have been identified, new mitigation measures are proposed to reduce potential impacts to a less-than- significant level. In addition, for the issues of biological resources, tribal cultural resources and paleontological resources, this Subsequent IS/MND identifies new “project-level” substitute mitigation measures that are found to be equally as effective at reducing potential impacts to a less-than-significant level as those presented in the GPU FEIR.
Project Location and Existing Conditions
The project would be constructed primarily within the road right-of-way (ROW) (additional ROW to be required from approximately nine parcels, which are mostly landscaped areas) of Roseville Parkway generally between Gibson Drive and Creekside Ridge Drive in Roseville (Figure 1-1).
The project site falls within the Roseville 7.5-minute U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangle map in Sections 25, 26, and 27 of Township 11 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian.
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-4 June 2024
ICF 103175
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
2035 General Plan Update Final EIR AECOM
City of Roseville 4.3-25 Transportation
Source: Fehr & Peers 2020
Exhibit 4.3-5 General Plan Lane Increases
Change in Lanes (Both Directions)
Note:
1. Shown for arterial streets only.
2. This map represents the number of added lanes
over the existing (2020) conditions. Some of the
identi/f_ied road widenings/extensions were completed
between 2014 and 2020.
0 1
2 4
6 Graphics … 103175 (6-24-2022) JC
Figure 1-2
General Plan Lane Increases
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2020.
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-6 June 2024
ICF 103175
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-7 June 2024
ICF 103175
The project site includes Roseville Parkway and intersections at Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Creekside Ridge Drive, Galleria Boulevard, Reserve Drive, West Drive, and Gibson Drive. City preserve areas (Highland Reserve South) are on the south side of Roseville Parkway between Reserve Drive and West Drive. South Branch Pleasant Grove Creek and an unnamed tributary cross under Roseville Parkway, and Highland Ravine crosses under Pleasant Grove Boulevard through culverts. Antelope Creek is located east of Creekside Ridge Drive outside of the project site. Residential uses are located on the south side of Roseville Parkway northwest of West Drive, and on the north side of Roseville Parkway west of Gibson Drive. The project area surrounding the road ROW is zoned for residential, commercial, light industrial, and open space uses.
Catheryn Gates Elementary School is located approximately 800 feet south of the Roseville Parkway/Gibson Drive intersection. Vencil Brown Elementary School is located approximately
0.6 mile west of the Roseville Parkway/Gibson Drive intersection.
Project Purpose and Need
The City’s Transportation System 2035 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) identifies planned improvements to the city-wide road network to reduce congestion and enhance accessibility for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists. Transportation system CIP improvements are funded by traffic impact fees assessed on new development. The proposed project would implement certain planned CIP improvements within the project limits with funding provided in part by the CIP fee program. No federal funding would be used for the project.
The project purpose is to improve existing and future traffic circulation along Roseville Parkway to be consistent with the City’s CIP and applicable General Plan policy while enhancing safety for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists. The project would improve operations along westbound Roseville Parkway approaching and through the Creekside Ridge Drive intersection.
Project Description
Road Improvements
The proposed project consists of the following road improvement activities (shown on Figure 1- 3):
⚫ Widening of Roseville Parkway from three lanes to four lanes in each direction. The westbound direction would be widened from Creekside Ridge Drive to Gibson Drive (east).
The eastbound direction would be widened from Reserve Drive to Creekside Ridge Drive.
This road widening activity would require removal of the existing sidewalk, curb and gutter, and landscaping (including grass, shrubs, and trees), as well as relocation of some utilities. ⚫ Constructing triple left-turn lanes on southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway. This would involve removal of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping (including groundcover, trees, shrubs, and landscape irrigation). ⚫ Constructing triple left-turn lanes from northbound Galleria Boulevard to westbound Roseville Parkway.
Source: Mark Thomas, 2023.
Figure 1-3
Roseville Parkway Improvements
Graphics … 103175 (10-30-2023) JC
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-9 June 2024
ICF 103175
⚫ Improving intersections along Roseville Parkway at Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Gibson Drive, West Drive, Reserve Drive, Galleria Boulevard, and Creekside Ridge Road and the removal of the porkchop islands. Intersection improvements involve removal of the existing sidewalk, curb and gutter, and landscaping (including grass, shrubs, and trees), as well as some utility relocation, and coordinated traffic signal improvements. ⚫ Installing an auxiliary lane on Roseville Parkway between Creekside Ridge Drive and Galleria Boulevard. No ROW would be required along City-owned sections of the alignment. ⚫ Extending the right-turn pocket on northbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard between Pioneer Road and Roseville Parkway.
⚫ Relocation of Class II bike lanes to be adjacent to edge of pavement on both sides of Roseville Parkway between Gibson Drive and Creekside Ridge Drive.
Traffic Signal Improvements
The proposed project consists of the following traffic signal improvements along the project corridor:
⚫ Traffic signal modifications at the Roseville Parkway intersections at Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Castaic Drive/Gibson Drive, West Drive, Reserve Drive, Galleria Boulevard, and Creekside Ridge Drive (6 intersections).
⚫ Installation of new traffic signal poles and mast arms at Roseville Parkway/Pleasant Grove Boulevard intersection for southbound approach to accommodate third left-turn lane and for westbound approach due to intersection safety improvements. ⚫ Installation of new traffic signal poles and mast arms at Roseville Parkway intersections at Castaic Drive/Gibson Drive, West Drive, and Reserve Drive intersections for westbound and northbound approaches to accommodate widening of Roseville Parkway. Improvements also include replacement of underground infrastructure including in-pavement loop detectors, conduits, pull boxes, and cables/conductors.
⚫ Installation of new traffic signal poles and mast arms at Roseville Parkway/Galleria Boulevard intersection (all approaches) to accommodate widening of Roseville Parkway and intersection safety improvements (removal of porkchop islands and free right-turn movements). Improvements also include replacement of traffic signal controller cabinet and associated underground infrastructure including in-pavement loop detectors, conduits, pull boxes, and cables/conductors. ⚫ Installation of new traffic signal poles and mast arms at Roseville Parkway/Creekside Ridge Drive intersection (all approaches) to accommodate widening of Roseville Parkway. Improvements also include replacement of traffic signal controller cabinet and associated underground infrastructure including in-pavement loop detectors, conduits, pull boxes, and cables/conductors. ⚫ Replacement of existing fiber optic signal interconnect infrastructure, including fiber optic cable, conduits, pull boxes, and other associated hardware where impacted by the widening of Roseville Parkway.
Utility Relocations
There are existing gas lines within the proposed roadway widening that may require relocation based on current depth and allowable placement of fill. Any relocations would be buried to a depth of approximately 3 feet and would remain along the existing roadway alignment within identified disturbance areas.
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-10 June 2024
ICF 103175
Storm drain, domestic water, reclaimed water, and sanitary sewer pipes also exist within the existing road alignment. It is anticipated these pipes would remain in place and the manholes or valves adjusted to grade. Storm drain facilities constructed as part of the proposed roadway widening would tie into and discharge to existing storm drain facilities.
Right-of-Way Acquisition
All proposed improvements would be within City-acquired ROW and easements. Additional ROW and/or easements would be required from approximately nine parcels, which are mostly landscaped areas. The total ROW acquisition is approximately 1.36 acres(Appendix A).
For the most part, construction activities would take place between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday and between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, in compliance with the City noise ordinance. However, depending on the project schedule and other constraints, night-time construction is likely. If night-time construction is warranted, the City would require the contractor to formally request it and the contract documents would note the days, working hours and note that any deviation to the contract working hours would need to be made and approved by the City. The City would place conditions on the approval such as notification to the public about night work, the working hour window, lane closures and/or detours, and the type of construction activities allowed.
Based on available funding, the City has decided to separate the overall project into two phases.
Phase 1 and 2 are illustrated in Figure 1-4 with Phase 1 shown in blue and Phase 2 in red.
The general construction phases, duration, and number of days are identified in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1. Project Construction Phase 1
Phase 1 Start End Days
Grubbing/Land Clearing Day 1 Day 150 150
Grading/Excavation Day 6 Day 156 150
Draining/Utilities/Subgrade Day 10 Day 160 150
Paving Day 20 Day 170 150
Striping/Pavement Marking Day 150 Day 180 30
Equipment and Material Staging Areas
Equipment and material staging would occur within designated locations within the project site but not encroach into any open space areas. In addition, the contractor may choose to establish additional staging areas through agreement with private property owners on developed or disturbed land adjacent to or near the project site. Staging areas would accommodate fueling and maintenance areas for equipment, along with designated areas for material storage. As described under Best Management Practices below, measures would be implemented to minimize potential construction-related water quality impacts and ensure compliance with requirements of the project’s stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP).
Source: Mark Thomas, 2023.
Graphics … 103175 (10-30-2023) JC
Figure 1-4
Project Phasing
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-12 June 2024
ICF 103175
Earthwork and Grading
The project site topography is relatively flat, and only minor grading would be required to prepare the site for construction. All grading would be conducted using conventional grading equipment.
Initial earthwork would include removing sidewalk material; clearing landscape trees, shrubs, and grass; and preparing the ground for construction. Consistent with the City’s grading ordinance, all grading would be limited to designated work areas. Finish grading would be achieved by motor graders (blades) and skip loaders.
Construction BMPs specified in the SWPPP would be implemented during earthwork to control dust and protect nearby aquatic resources (adjacent vernal pools and swales in preserve areas, and waterways that cross under Roseville Parkway) from siltation associated with stormwater runoff.
Construction Traffic Control
Project construction would temporarily affect existing pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities or existing Roseville Parkway vehicle travel lanes. However, during construction of intersection improvements, temporary lane shifting, or temporary lane closures would be implemented as necessary with the assistance of construction signage and/or flaggers consistent with standard traffic handling practices. This could also include temporary detours for pedestrian and bicyclists routing through intersections during paving and restriping activities; however, controlled vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle access through affected intersections would be maintained at all times.
See Right-of-Way Acquisition above regarding night-time construction.
Project Schedule
Project construction for Phase 1 is scheduled to begin in Spring/Summer of 2024 and proceed according to the activities described in Table 1-1. Construction is expected to take approximately 5 to 6 months for Phase 1, 8 to 10 months for Phase 2, with a scheduled roadway opening date of Spring 2025 (pending on weather.).
Best Management Practices
The City and its contractor will implement construction BMPs to avoid and minimize impacts on sensitive environmental resources. Implementation of the Erosion Control Plan, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and associated SWPPP, and the BMPs listed below will minimize the potential for construction-related surface water pollution and ensure that water quality in adjacent waterways and wetlands (collectively referred to as “surface waters”) within City preserve areas would be protected.
BMP 1 – Temporary Fencing. The City’s contractor shall install construction barrier fencing (including sediment fencing and straw wattles) to prevent contaminants and debris from entering surface waters in adjacent preserve areas. Before construction begins, the City or its contractor shall identify the locations for the barrier fencing and mark those locations with stakes or flagging.
BMP 2 – SWPPP. A SWPPP shall be implemented as part of the NPDES Permit and a General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit to minimize the potential for sediments or contaminants to enter surface waters.
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-13 June 2024
ICF 103175
BMP 3 – Equipment Contaminants. The City shall comply with applicable stormwater ordinances, stormwater management plans, and BMPs to prevent or minimize the potential release of equipment-related petroleum contaminants into surface waters and groundwater.
Implementation of standard construction procedures and precautions for working with petroleum and construction chemicals would further ensure that the impacts related to chemical handling during project construction would be minor.
BMP 4 – Debris/Demolition. Construction of the proposed project would require the demolition and excavation of existing asphalt concrete, base material, concrete pavement, and miscellaneous concrete and in-situ soils. Excess material is anticipated and would become the property of the Contractor. To the extent feasible, excavated material could be re-used on the project site, subject to approval by project inspectors.
BMP 5 – Erosion Control. The project's construction documents shall incorporate permanent erosion control elements to ensure that stormwater runoff does not cause soil erosion. Erosion and sediment control plans would be prepared consistent with the City’s Grading Ordinance, which requires reducing erosion and retaining sediment onsite.
BMP 6 – Toxic Materials Control and Spill Response Plan. The following measures shall be incorporated into project construction documents and implemented by the contractor to avoid or minimize the risk of spills or discharges of toxic materials into surface waters. ⚫ Prepare a hazardous material Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan (SPCCP) before construction that shall be implemented during construction. ⚫ Prevent raw cement, concrete or concrete washings, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other petroleum products, or any other substances that could be hazardous to aquatic life from contaminating the soil or entering surface waters. ⚫ Prevent discharge of drilling mud and/or fluids into the surface waters by using appropriate containment, disposal, and storage methods.
⚫ Prevent discharge of turbid water or sediment-laden runoff to the waterways by using sediment filters, diverting the water to a settling tank, and/or implementing other erosion and water quality control BMPs to ensure compliance with water quality requirements prior to discharging water back to the waterways. No water will be discharged into adjacent preserve area vernal pools and other wetlands.
⚫ Clean up all spills immediately according to the SPCCP. ⚫ Provide areas located outside the City preserve areas and on disturbed/developed sites for staging and storing equipment, materials, fuels, lubricants, solvents, and other possible contaminants.
⚫ Prohibit refueling and lubricating activities within 100 feet of surface waters to prevent contaminants from being discharged into surface waters during storm runoff. Contaminated water would be pumped to a holding tank for proper disposal. ⚫ The construction contractor shall notify the City of Roseville Fire Department if evidence of soil or groundwater contamination is encountered during construction activities. Construction in that area shall be halted until the Fire Department has evaluated the find and remediation is completed, if necessary.
⚫ The construction contractor shall comply with the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal-OSHA) standards for the storage and handling of fuels, flammable
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-14 June 2024
ICF 103175
materials, and common construction-related hazardous materials and for fire prevention (California Labor Code, Division 5, Chapter 2.5).
BMP 7 – Transportation Management Plan. The City shall require the construction contractor to implement a Transportation Management Plan (TMP), including a construction schedule and plan to meet the City’s approval before construction activities are initiated. This plan will identify general methods by which construction activities will be managed to minimize substantial delays to traffic. The TMP shall include the following elements:
⚫ Communication: Develop and implement a public information campaign that describes the duration of the lane closures and recommends alternative routes. Particular attention shall be placed on special events (e.g., school graduations or Placer County Fairgrounds) that may attract unfamiliar users to the City’s roadway system. The City Public Information Office shall also continue a public outreach program using various media sources throughout construction.
⚫ Demolition and Construction: Describe and analyze the number of employees and their site parking areas, and the number of trucks, their routing/staging, and operating hours. ⚫ Wayfinding: Position and operate changeable message sign (CMS) trailers and locate pedestrian signage at strategic locations to advise the traveling public of construction activities and temporary lane reductions and suggest alternate routes. ⚫ Bicycle/Pedestrian Travel: Close any multi-use paths to all travelers during periods in which construction activity could pose safety concerns to those users. Advertise multi-use path closures in advance and suggest alternate routes.
⚫ Emergency Vehicle Response: The City Public Works Department shall coordinate with the City Police and Fire Departments to ensure potential effects of temporary lane closures on emergency response have been addressed, including emergency vehicle routing, temporary changes in fire station servicing areas, and emergency vehicle pre-emption at signalized intersections.
⚫ Monitoring: The construction TMP shall include a monitoring program of daily traffic volumes and speeds on Roseville Parkway between Creekside Ridge Drive and Pleasant Grove Boulevard. The TMP shall describe the frequency of monitoring and establish maximum acceptable thresholds for changes in operations, above which a series of temporary traffic calming measures, such as temporary speed humps, enhanced enforcement, and other measures, may be considered.
BMP 8 – Noise Control Measures. The following measures shall be incorporated into the Project construction specifications to reduce and control noise generated by construction-related activities:
⚫ All construction equipment shall have sound-control devices no less effective than those provided on the original equipment.
⚫ No equipment shall have an unmuffled exhaust.
⚫ Stationary construction equipment shall be located as far as possible from sensitive uses, sensitive uses shall be identified on construction drawings, and excessive equipment idling (greater than five minutes) shall be prohibited when the equipment is not in use.
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-15 June 2024
ICF 103175
C
City of Roseville Mitigating Ordinances, Guidelines, and Standards
As part of the proposed project, the City will implement the following regulations and ordinances to reduce potential environmental impacts associated with the project. ⚫ Noise Regulation (Roseville Municipal Code [RMC] Ch.9.24) ⚫ Urban Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (RMC Ch.14.20) ⚫ Stormwater Quality Design Manual (Resolution 07-432)
⚫ City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards (Resolution 07-137) ⚫ Community Design Guidelines (Resolution 95-347)
⚫ Tree Ordinance (RMC Ch. 19.66)
Required Approvals
Required permits and approvals are shown in Table 1-2. Local approvals required to construct and operate the project include adoption of the Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan by the City Council and approval of the project plans and specifications and construction contract. In addition, the proposed construction activities would trigger Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, which requires coverage under the NPDES Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. This coverage would require development and implementation of a SWPPP. No other state or federal approvals are required for the project.
Table 1-2. Permits and Approvals Needed for the Project Agency Permit/Approval
City of Roseville Adoption of the Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Roseville Approval of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan City of Roseville Approval of Plans and Specifications and Construction Agreement State Water Resources
Control Board
Clean Water Act Section 402 coverage under the NPDES Permit (Order No. 00-06-DWQ)
Consultation with California Native American
Tribes
Assembly Bill (AB) 52 requires that prior to the release of a CEQA document for a project, an agency begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project if (1) the California Native American tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the Lead Agency through formal notification of proposed projects in the geographic area that is traditionally and culturally affiliated
City of Roseville
Introduction and Project Description
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 1-16 June 2024
ICF 103175
with the tribe and (2) the California Native American tribe responds in writing, within 30 days of receipt of the formal notification, and requests the consultation.
The City notified United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC), Shingle Springs band of Miwok Indians, Tsi Akim Maidu, Ione Band of Miwok Indians, and Wilton Rancheria of the proposed project on April 26, 2022. The only response came on May 18, 2022, from Anna Starkey of the UAIC. The UAIC responded that the UAIC would like to consult on the project and asked for further information about the project area, schedule, and depths of excavation. Terri Shirhall from the City of Roseville, responded on May 23, 2022, confirming UAIC’s request and answering Ms.
Starkey’s questions about the project. On November 8, 2022, Ms. Starkey responded that she had no further questions or concerns and requested that the City include UAIC’s standard unanticipated discovery mitigation measure language and that UAIC considers AB 52 consultation closed. Additional information on potential Tribal Cultural Resources in the project area is provided in Chapter 2, Section XVIII, Tribal Cultural Resources.
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-1 June 2024
ICF 103175
Chapter 2
Environmental Checklist
This is adapted from Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form, of the State CEQA Guidelines.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-2 June 2024
ICF 103175
1. Project Title: Roseville Parkway Widening Project
2. Lead Agency Name
and Address:
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
3. Contact Person and
Phone Number:
Jessica Lynch
Environmental Coordinator
Development Services Department
(916) 774-5352
4. Project Location: The project would widen Roseville Parkway between Gibson Drive and Creekside Ridge Drive and construct triple left-turn lanes on southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway. The project site falls within the Roseville 7.5-minute U.S.
Geological Survey topographic quadrangle map in Sections 25, 26, and 27 of Township 11 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian.
5. Project Sponsor’s
Name and Address:
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
6. General Plan
Designation:
Road ROW adjacent to RC, CC, OS, BP, PR, HDR, MDR, IND, and P/QP
7. Zoning: Road ROW adjacent to OS, CC/SA-NC, RS, R3/DS/SA-NC, R3, PR, R1/DS, RC/SA-NC, and M2
8. Name of Prior CEQA
Document:
City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report
9. Description of Project, Including Relationship to the Subject of the Prior CEQA Document:
The City of Roseville (City) proposes to construct the Roseville Parkway Widening Project (project) between Gibson Drive and Creekside Ridge Drive in the City of Roseville, California (Figure 1-1). The project would consist of the widening of Roseville Parkway from three lanes to four lanes in each direction. The westbound direction would generally be widened between Creekside Ridge Drive and Gibson Drive (east), and the eastbound direction would be widened between Reserve Drive and Creekside Ridge Drive. The project would also include constructing triple left-turn lanes on southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway, constructing triple left-turn lanes from northbound Galleria Boulevard to westbound Roseville Parkway, and intersection improvements along Roseville Parkway at Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Gibson Drive, West Drive, Reserve Drive, Galleria Boulevard , and Creekside Ridge Road.
The City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report (GPU FEIR) (Figure 1-2) identified between one- and two-lane increases for Roseville Parkway generally between Gibson Drive (east) to West Drive and beyond.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-3 June 2024
ICF 103175
10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
The project site is currently the existing Roseville Parkway and intersections at Creekside Ridge Drive, Galleria Boulevard, Reserve Drive, West Drive, and Gibson Drive. Land uses include commercial, open space, and residential. Commercial development bord ers the project along most of the north boundary of Roseville Parkway, and along the western side of Pleasant Grove Boulevard. Open space (Highland Reserve South) is on the south side of Roseville Parkway west of Reserve Drive, and on both sides of Roseville Parkway west of Galleria Circle. Antelope Creek is located east of Creekside Ridge Drive outside of the project site. Residential uses are located on the south side of Roseville Parkway northwest of West Drive, and on the north side of Roseville Parkway west of Gibson Drive.
11. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required:
State Water Resources Control Board—Clean Water Act Section 402, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit for disturbance of more than 1 acre of land.
12. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 (i.e., AB 52)? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? On April 26, 2022, the City of Roseville sent certified letters to the following tribes requesting consultation or information regarding tribal cultural resources in the project area. The letters requested a response within 30 days.
⚫ United Auburn Indian Community (Gene Whitehouse, Chairman) ⚫ Shingle Springs band of Miwok Indians (Nicholas Fonseca, Chairperson) ⚫ Tsi Akim Maidu (Don Ryberg, Chairperson)
⚫ Ione Band of Miwok Indians (Sara D. Setshwaelo, Cultural Committee Chair) ⚫ Wilton Rancheria
The only response came on May 18, 2022, from Anna Starkey of the UAIC. In her email, Ms.
Starkey stated that the UAIC would like to consult on the project and asked for further information about the project area, schedule, and depths of excavation.
Terri Shirhall from the City of Roseville, responded on May 23, 2022, confirming UAIC’s request and answering Ms. Starkey’s questions about the project.
On June 14, 2022, Ms. Starkey requested further project information as the project could be near an unrecorded cultural resource. Ms. Shirhall sent project plans on July 5, 2022, and explained that the project would not encroach upon the open space.
On November 8, 2022, Ms. Starkey responded that she had no further questions or concerns and requested that the City include UAIC’s standard unanticipated discovery mitigation measure language and that UAIC considers AB 52 consultation closed.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-4 June 2024
ICF 103175
Earlier Analysis
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (Public Resources Code Section 15063(c)(3)(D)). In this case, a discussion should identify the following.
a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report, available at the City of Roseville Development Services Department – Planning Division 311 Vernon Street, and online at https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Deve lopment%20Services/Planning/General%20Plan/Final%20General%20Plan%20EIR/City%20 of%20Roseville%20EIR.pdf.
b. Impact adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
All effects identified in the checklist were adequately analyzed in the GPU FEIR and were addressed by the mitigation measures from the GPU FEIR. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are “potentially significant unless mitigated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the project that were not adequately covered by the GPU FEIR.
Authority: Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21083.05.
Reference: Section 65088.4, Government Code; Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21082.1, 21083, 21083.05, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21095, and 21151, Public Resources Code; Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988), 202 Cal. App. 3d 296; Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337; Eureka Citizens for Responsible Govt. v. City of Eureka (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th at 1109; San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City and County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-5 June 2024
ICF 103175
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would potentially be affected by this project (i.e., the ”subsequent activity”). The purpose of the following checklist is to make an initial determination of whether these are new or substantially more severe impacts relative to those disclosed in the prior CEQA document.
Aesthetics Agricultural and Forestry Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance
Determination
The subsequent activity has been evaluated pursuant to the provisions of Sections 15162— 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines to determine whether a subsequent EIR or mitigated negative declaration, a supplemental EIR, or an addendum to the prior EIR, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration is required. The analysis compares the impacts identified in the prior document with those expected to result from the subsequent activity to determine whether the activity would result in any new or substantially more severe significant effect. No subsequent or supplemental document is necessary if the impacts of the subsequent activity do not exceed those identified in the prior document. The modified checklist on the following pages has been changed to identify whether the proposed project would result in a new significant impact, substantially more severe impact, a less-than-significant impact with additional mitigation, or no new impact. On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed subsequent activity would not have a new or substantially more severe significant effect on the environment, and no subsequent EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the subsequent activity would have a new or substantially more severe significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions to the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent that will reduce the effect below the level of significance. A subsequent MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the subsequent activity would have a new or substantially more severe significant effect on the environment, and a subsequent ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the subsequent activity would not have a new or substantially more severe significant effect on the environment, and no subsequent EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. However, minor technical changes are necessary to the prior EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION and an addendum will be prepared.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-6 June 2024
ICF 103175
Signature Date
Printed Name For
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
1. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a subsequent project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected. Those environmental effects are not necessarily limited to the items on the checklist, or the effects disclosed in the prior CEQA document.
2. The use of this checklist is intended to be limited to subsequent activities that are essentially the same as the project analyzed in the prior EIR, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration. If the later activity is not part of the project analyzed in the prior EIR, the standard initial study checklist should be used. An explanation is required for all answers. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to activities like the one involved (e.g., the activity is not on agricultural land).
3. All answers must take account of the findings of the prior EIR, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. The subsequent activity is subject to all applicable mitigation measures. Keep in mind that the key question is not whether the subsequent project will have a significant impact on the environment, but instead whether it will have a new or substantially more severe impact in relation to the conclusions in the prior CEQA document.
4. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact would occur as a result of the subsequent activity, the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is a new impact not analyzed in the prior EIR, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration, or an impact that is substantially more severe than disclosed in the prior EIR, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration. If there are one or more “New or Substantially More Severe Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, a subsequent EIR is required.
5. When the incorporation of mitigation measures would reduce all new or substantially more severe impacts to less than significant impacts, a subsequent mitigated negative declaration is required.
6. The analysis can presume that an effect has been adequately analyzed in the prior EIR, negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration unless a substantial change in the project, a substantial change in its circumstances, or new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the prior EIR, negative declaration, or mitigated negative
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-7 June 2024
ICF 103175
declaration was certified or adopted indicates that any of the conditions described in Guidelines Section 15162(a)(1), (2) or (3) have occurred. In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a. Prior Analysis Used. Identify and state where the prior EIR, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration is available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects of the subsequent activity on the following checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the prior EIR, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration pursuant to Section 15162 and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures in that prior document.
c. Mitigation Measures. Describe the mitigation measures that are incorporated from the prior document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. Describe any new or refined mitigation measures that are necessary to prepare a subsequent mitigated negative declaration for the subsequent activity.
7. The determinations must be based on substantial evidence. Lead agencies should incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts.
Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, when appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
8. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level.
10. Evaluations based on a prior Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will be judged based on the “fair argument standard.” Evaluations based on a prior EIR will be judged based on the “substantial evidence standard.”
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-8 June 2024
ICF 103175
I. Aesthetics
I. Aesthetics
New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More
Severe
Significant
Impact
Less-than-
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
Except as provided in Public Resources Code
Section 21099, would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings along
a scenic highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point.) If the project is
in an urbanized area, would the project
conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare that would adversely affect daytime
or nighttime views in the area?
Setting
The project site lies within an urbanizing area of North Roseville. Roseville and its environs are generally characterized as a transitional zone between the Central Valley’s flat terrain and the Sierra Nevada foothills. On clear days, long-range views in the project vicinity include the Sierra Nevada to the east, the Sutter Buttes to the north, and the Coast Ranges to the west.
The project site and nearby undeveloped areas consist primarily of commercial, residential, and open space land uses. Commercial development borders the project along most of the north boundary (westbound) of Roseville Parkway, and along the western side of Pleasant Grove Boulevard. Residential development is along the southern border of Roseville Parkway from West Drive to Gibson Drive and Roseville Parkway and Pleasant Grove Boulevard. Open space areas (Highland Reserve South) are on the south side of Roseville Parkway west of Reserve Drive, and on both sides of Roseville Parkway west of Galleria Circle. Mature trees and shrubs are a part of the landscaping along Roseville Parkway and in the median, particularly along the commercial and residential areas.
The primary groups that would have views of the project are employees and shoppers at the Galleria and Fountains shopping centers and other similar uses, nearby residents, and roadway travelers.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-9 June 2024
ICF 103175
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? The GPU FEIR concluded that there are no scenic vistas within the Planning Area, nor is the Planning Area visible from any scenic vista; therefore, new development within the Planning Area would have a less-than-significant impact on scenic vistas. There are no designated scenic vistas in the project vicinity. The project would consist of the widening of Roseville Parkway generally between Gibson Drive and Creekside Ridge Drive from three lanes to four lanes in each direction, constructing triple left-turn lanes on southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway, and intersection improvements along Roseville Parkway at Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Gibson Drive, West Drive, Reserve Drive, Galleria Boulevard, and Creekside Ridge Road. The low-lying structures would not be evident beyond the project vicinity and the roadway improvements would be similar to existing conditions. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
b. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? The GPU FEIR concluded that there is no designated or eligible state scenic highway within or close to the Planning Area, and the Planning Area is not visible from any officially designated or eligible state or locally designated scenic highway. The City of Roseville does not have any locally designated scenic highways. Thus, there would be no impact, and this issue was not addressed further in the GPU FEIR. The project site is still not located near or within view of any state or locally designated scenic highway (California Department of Transportation 2017); therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
c. Would the project, in non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
The GPU FEIR concluded that the visual character in the northwest and western portions of the Planning Area would change from existing undeveloped open space and agricultural land to urban development as a result of the site-specific project developments envisioned under the proposed General Plan Update, and that the impact was considered significant. Although the project area is already developed, removal of existing vegetation, site grading, and roadway and intersection reconstruction would introduce heavy equipment, including backhoes, bulldozers, and excavators, into the viewshed of all viewer groups, creating temporary effects on views of and from the project site during the construction period. These activities would be visible from ground-level and elevated vantages. However, the visual effects of construction activities would be less than significant because of their temporary character and the transience of some viewers passing by the project site.
The widening of Roseville Parkway would alter the site’s visual character and would be visible to residents in the project vicinity, employees and shoppers at the Galleria and Fountains shopping centers and other similar uses, and roadway travelers. The project would not permanently degrade either the visual character of the project site or its surroundings, because Roseville Parkway is already in use. Additionally, the project would
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-10 June 2024
ICF 103175
not be inconsistent with existing City regulations governing scenic quality. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
d. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? The GPU FEIR concluded that it was not feasible to mitigate light and glare impacts completely without prohibiting the use of light in new development, and that no other feasible mitigation measures were available; therefore, this impact was considered significant and unavoidable. The project would include streetlights similar to existing streetlights along Roseville Parkway and in the project vicinity and would be visually compatible with existing streetlights and would not create additional, substantial unnecessary light. If night-time construction is warranted, the City would require the contractor to formally request it and the contract documents would note the days, working hours and note that any deviation to the contract working hours would need to be made and approved by the City. The City would place conditions on the approval such as notification to the public about night work, the working hour window, lane closures and/or detours, and the type of construction activities allowed. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
No aspect of the project would create a new source of substantial glare in an area not already experiencing glare. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
Mitigation Measures
The project would not result in any new potentially significant impacts on aesthetic resources not already analyzed in the GPU FEIR. Therefore, no new mitigation measures are necessary.
References
California Department of Transportation. 2017. California Scenic Highways Map Viewer.
Available:
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f0259b1ad0fe4093a5604c9b838a486a.
Accessed: April 7, 2022.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-11 June 2024
ICF 103175
II. Agricultural and Forestry Resources
II. Agricultural and Forestry Resources
New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More
Severe
Significant
Impact
Less-than-
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
In determining whether impacts on agricultural
resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and
Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by
the California Department of Conservation as
an optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. In determining
whether impacts on forest resources, including
timberland, are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to information
compiled by the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the
state’s inventory of forest land, including the
Forest and Range Assessment Project and
the Forest Legacy Assessment Project, and
forest carbon measurement methodology
provided in the Forest Protocols adopted by
the California Air Resources Board. Would the
project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use or conflict with a
Williamson Act contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code Section
12220(g)), timberland (as defined by
Public Resources Code Section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland Production
(as defined by Government Code Section
51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment that, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-12 June 2024
ICF 103175
Setting
The project site is currently developed and surrounded by residential, commercial, and open space uses. According to the California Department of Conservation’s California Important Farmland Finder for Placer County, the project site is primarily designated as “Urban and Built- Up Land” with a few areas designated as “Grazing Land” (California Department of Conservation 2016). Surrounding lands have the same designations.
The project site is not restricted to agricultural uses under the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act), and the project area is not zoned for agricultural or forestry use.
Impact Analysis
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? The GPU FEIR concluded that there would be no impact with regard to conversion of Important Farmland. The project site is designated primarily as Urban and Built-Up Land, with a few areas designated Grazing Land, and contains no Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (California Department of Conservation 2016); therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or conflict with a Williamson Act contract?
The GPU FEIR concluded that there would be no impact with regard to a conflict with agricultural zoning or a Williamson Act Contract. The project site is the existing Roseville Parkway, which is surrounded by developed residential and commercial lands and open space and designated and zoned for those uses. The project site is not under Williamson Act contract. The project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or conflict with a Williamson Act contract; therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts. c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
There is no forest land, timberland, or timberland production on the project site or in the City of Roseville. Therefore, the project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, these resources. There would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? The project site is Roseville Parkway, which is surrounded by developed residential and commercial lands and open space. Thus, the project would not result in the loss or conversion of forest land. There would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-13 June 2024
ICF 103175
e. Involve other changes in the existing environment that, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
The GPU FEIR concluded that there would be no impact with regard to conversion of Important Farmland. The project site is not designated or zoned for agricultural or forest use and contains no active agricultural uses or forest land. The adjacent parcels are also not designated or zoned for agricultural or forest use, and they contain no active agricultural uses or forest land; therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
Mitigation Measures
The project would not result in any new potentially significant impacts on agricultural and forestry resources not already analyzed in the GPU FEIR. Therefore, no new mitigation measures are necessary.
References
California Department of Conservation. 2016. California Important Farmland Finder. Available:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. Accessed: April 7, 2022.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-14 June 2024
ICF 103175
III. Air Quality
III. Air Quality
New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More
Severe
Significant
Impact
Less-than-
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
When available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district
may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which
the project region is nonattainment under
an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard?
c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d. Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
Setting
The affected environment for air quality that would be affected by construction and operation of the proposed project would be similar to what is described in Section 4.4, Air Quality, of the GPU FEIR. The GPU FEIR provides a discussion of regional climate and meteorology; pollutants relevant to the General Plan study area and impact analyses; ambient air quality standards and concentrations; regional attainment status; and relevant federal, state, and local air quality regulations, including thresholds of significance adopted by the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD). The proposed project would be located entirely within the General Plan study area. The affected environment described in the GPU FEIR applies to the proposed project and is incorporated by reference.
Section 4.4 of the GPU FEIR defines sensitive receptors as “schools, daycare centers, parks and playgrounds, and medical facilities” and generally describes their locations within and adjacent to the General Plan study area. There are several residential developments adjacent to Roseville Parkway, both to the north and south of the road. Sonrisa Senior Living facility is on the northeast corner of Gibson Drive and Roseville Parkway. Twinwood Park is on the southeast corner of Pleasant Grove Boulevard and Roseville Parkway. Catheryn Gates Elementary School is located approximately 650 feet south of the Roseville Parkway and Gibson Drive intersection.
Impact Analysis
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The GPU FEIR discusses that PCAPCD has adopted the 2017 Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan, 2013 PM2.5 Implementation and Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request for Sacramento PM2.5 Nonattainment Area,
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-15 June 2024
ICF 103175
and the 2018 Triennial Progress Report as the most recent assessment of air quality improvements and air quality planning progress under the regional Air Quality Attainment Plan. The PCAPCD CEQA Thresholds of Significance Justification Report explains that the recommended criteria air pollutant significance thresholds adopted by PCAPCD serve as a proxy for evaluating consistency with these plans. Using these thresholds, the GPU FEIR found that construction and operational emissions generated by buildout of the General Plan has the potential to conflict with the region’s air quality attainment plans.
As discussed further under response III.b, neither construction nor operation of the proposed project would exceed PCAPCD’s thresholds. The project therefore would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of air quality plans for the study area. Moreover, the proposed project is consistent with the City’s applicable planning documents, including the General Plan, Bicycle Master Plan, Pedestrian Master Plan, and Short Range Transit Plan, as shown below.
Circulation System: Consistent with the proposed project, the facility is indicated to have seven or eight future lanes (Exhibit 4.3-4, GPU FEIR, page 4.3-23).
Transit Facilities: The immediate project area includes the Roseville Transit Galleria Transfer Point, which accommodates Bus Routes A, B, M, and S. The project limits, and therefore the proposed project, include several bus stops in addition to the aforementioned transfer point. These stops are located along eastbound Roseville Parkway after Reserve Drive (Routes A and B), eastbound Roseville Parkway after Galleria Boulevard (Route A), southbound Galleria Boulevard after Antelope Creek Drive (Route M), and northbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard after Roseville Parkway (Route M).
Bicycle Facilities: Consistent with the proposed project, Roseville Parkway is indicated to have Class II Bike Lanes along the entire stretch from Pleasant Grove Boulevard through the project area (Figure III-5, General Plan 2035 Circulation Element, page III-23; and Figure 4, Bicycle Master Plan, page 43).
Pedestrian Facilities: The proposed project includes both attached and detached (meandering) sidewalks, generally mimicking the existing conditions. Through its inclusion of these facilities, the proposed project supports the City’s General Plan 2035 and Pedestrian Master Plan goals.
Accordingly, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, the project would not result in any new impacts, and no mitigation is required. b. Cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is a nonattainment area for an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Construction
Even with adherence to PCAPCD rules, proposed General Plan Update Policy AQ1.3, and Specific Plan mitigation measures, the GPU FEIR conservatively assumed that emissions from buildout of the General Plan could exceed PCAPCD-recommended thresholds.
Therefore, implementation of the proposed General Plan Update could generate substantial construction-related pollutant emissions and result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria air pollutants for which the project region is designated a nonattainment area under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. There were no
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-16 June 2024
ICF 103175
feasible mitigation measures available to address this impact, and the GPU FEIR determined this impact is significant and unavoidable.
The predominant pollutants associated with construction of the proposed project are fugitive dust (particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter [PM10]) from earthmoving activities and combustion pollutants, particularly reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NOX), from heavy equipment and trucks. ROG would also be generated from paving activities.
Construction emissions were estimated using Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District’s (SMAQMD) latest Road Construction Model. While the model was developed for Sacramento conditions in terms of fleet emission factors, silt loading, and other model assumptions, it is considered adequate for estimating linear road construction emissions by the PCAPCD (in its air quality analysis guidance) and is used for that purpose in this project analysis.
Construction is anticipated to occur over five phases, (1) grubbing/land clearing, (2) grading/excavation, (3) drainage/utilities/sub-grade, (4) paving, and (5) striping activities that would occur over 180 working days, commencing in summer 2024. Project-specific model inputs were provided by the project engineers, Mark Thomas & Company (Cervantes pers. comm.).
Estimated unmitigated construction emissions are summarized in Table 2-1. Appendix B provides the full list of modeling assumptions.
Table 2-1. Estimated Unmitigated Criteria Pollutant Emissions from Project Construction (pounds per day)
Construction Phase ROG NOX PM101
Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.36 7.90 5.36
Grading/Excavation 0.58 7.90 5.37
Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.47 5.10 5.22
Paving 1.64 20.40 0.94
Striping 0.01 1.43 0.05
Maximum Daily2 3.06 42.73 16.94
PCAPCD Threshold 82 82 82
Exceed Threshold? No No No
NOX = nitrogen oxides
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
PM10 = particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter.
ROG = reactive organic gases
1 Accounts for fugitive dust control, as modeled by the Road Construction Emissions Model, achieved by use of onsite water trucks.
2 Represents the highest emissions during concurrent construction activity.
As shown in Table 2-1, construction of the proposed project would not generate ROG, NOX, or PM10 emissions in excess of PCAPCD’s thresholds. The proposed project would comply with the City’s Design and Construction Standards, further reducing fugitive dust emissions during site grading through implementation of best management practices (BMP) such as application of chemical soil stabilizers, vehicle speed controls, and limits on grading during
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-17 June 2024
ICF 103175
strong wind events. Accordingly, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, the project would not result in any new impacts, and no mitigation is required.
Operation
The GPU FEIR describes that even after incorporating proposed General Plan Update policies and Mitigation Measure 4.4-2a, certain projects may still have operational emissions that exceed PCAPCD thresholds, and it may not be feasible for all future projects to contribute to the PCAPCD offsite mitigation program at a level that would reduce those projects’ net emissions below PCAPCD’s thresholds. Therefore, the GPU FEIR found that implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would generate substantial operational-related pollutant emissions and result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria air pollutants for which the project region is designated a nonattainment area under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. There were no feasible mitigation measures beyond Mitigation Measure 4.4-2a to address this impact, and the GPU FEIR determined this impact is significant and unavoidable.
The project would widen Roseville Parkway, construct triple left-turn lanes on southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard, and complete various intersections improvements along Roseville Parkway. Widening of Roseville Parkway, including associated changes in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and criteria pollutant emissions, was comprehensively evaluated in the GPU FEIR. Implementation of the project would not change any of the prior analysis completed for widening of Roseville Parkway or the associated findings in the GPU FEIR.
The triple left-turn lanes and intersection improvements proposed under the project were not previously evaluated in the GPU FEIR. However, these project components would not increase VMT or otherwise deteriorate traffic operations. Rather, the proposed improvements are likely to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion, contributing to a regional and local air quality benefit.
Because the effect of widening Roseville Parkway was previously evaluated in the GPU FEIR, and the proposed triple left-turn lanes and intersection improvements would not result in air quality emissions, there would be no new impact with respect to generation of operational criteria pollutant emissions. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts. c. Exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? The primary pollutants of concern with respect to health risks to sensitive receptors are criteria pollutants (regional and local) and toxic air contaminants (TAC). Ozone precursors (ROG and NOX) and particulate matter (PM) are considered regional pollutants because they affect air quality on a regional scale. Localized pollutants are deposited and potentially affect populations near the emissions source. Because these pollutants dissipate with distance, emissions from individual projects can result in direct and material health impacts on adjacent sensitive receptors. The localized criteria pollutants of concern that would be generated by the project are PM (fugitive dust) and carbon monoxide (CO).
The GPU FEIR found that during construction and operation of the General Plan, localized air pollutant emissions would be generated that could affect existing and proposed sensitive receptors. Construction activities would generate diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions that could affect existing and proposed sensitive receptors. Existing regulations and policies,
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-18 June 2024
ICF 103175
as well as revised policies would reduce potential exposure to substantial pollutant concentrations. However, the GPU FEIR concluded that this impact would be significant and unavoidable.
With respect to localized CO, the GPU FEIR describes that buildout of the General Plan would contribute vehicles to local intersections that could cause a CO hotspot (i.e., exceedance of the CO ambient air quality standard). However, due to requirements for cleaner vehicle emissions, proposed land use and transportation goals and policies, and use of intelligent transportation system equipment, it is not anticipated that the General Plan’s land uses would contribute substantial vehicle volumes to existing or future intersections that could cause a CO hotspot. The GPU FEIR considered this impact to be less than significant.
Criteria Pollutants
Regional Emissions (ROG, NOX, and PM)
As described under response III.b, construction of the project would not generate ROG, NOX, or PM10 emissions in excess of PCAPCD’s thresholds, and operation of the project would not increase emissions relative to what was disclosed in the GPU FEIR. As such construction and operation of this project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and there would be no new impact.
While regional criteria pollutant emissions generated by construction of the project would not result in a significant impact, consistent with the California Supreme Court’s decision in Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (6 Cal. 5th 502), Table 2-2 provides a conservative estimate of potential health effects associated with these emissions. The estimates were developed using SMAQMD’s Minor Project Health Effects Tool (version 2), which was developed by SMAQMD, on behalf of regional air districts in the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area (SFNA), including western Placer County (Ramboll 2020). SMAQMD conducted photochemical and health effects modeling of hypothetical projects throughout the SFNA with NOX, ROG, and PM2.5 emissions at 82 pounds per day, which corresponds to the highest daily emissions threshold of all SFNA air districts. The tool outputs the estimated health effects at the 82 pound per day emissions rate by spatial interpolating the health effects from the hypothetical projects based on user inputs for the latitude and longitude coordinates of a project.
The results presented in Table 2-1 are conservative for two reasons. First, they are based on a source generating 82 pounds per day of ROG, NOX, and PM10. As shown in Table 2-1, maximum daily emissions during construction are well below 82 pounds. Second, the results assume the source would generate emissions 365 days per year. Construction of the project would require 180 working days. For these reasons, any increase in regional health risks associated with project-generated construction emissions would be less than those presented in Table 2-2, which are already very small increases over the background incident health effect.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-19 June 2024
ICF 103175
Table 2-2. Conservative Estimate of Increased Regional Health Effect Incidence Resulting from Construction of the Project (cases per year) Health Endpoint
Age
Range1
Mean
Incidences
(per year)2
Percent of
Background
Health Incidence3
Emergency Room Visits, Asthma 0–99 <1 <1%
Hospital Admissions, Asthma 0–64 <1 <1%
Hospital Admissions, All Respiratory (less
Myocardial Infarction) 65–99 <1 <1%
Hospital Admissions, All Cardiovascular
(less Myocardial Infarction) 65–99 <1 <1%
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Nonfatal 18–24 <1 <1%
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Nonfatal 25–44 <1 <1%
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Nonfatal 45–54 <1 <1%
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Nonfatal 55–64 <1 <1%
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Nonfatal 65–99 <1 <1%
Mortality, All Cause 30–99 2 <1%
Source: SMAQMD Minor Project Health Screening Tool, version 2, published June 2020.
Note: The analysis point is in the center of the project alignment at 38.787412, -121.307778. 1 Affected age ranges are shown. Other age ranges are available, but the endpoints and age ranges shown here are the ones used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in their health assessments. The age ranges are consistent with the epidemiological study that is the basis of the health function. 2 Health effects are shown in terms of incidences of each health endpoint and how it compares to the base (2035 base year health effect incidences, or “background health incidence”) values. Health effects and background health incidences are across the Northern California model domain. 3 The percent of background health incidence uses the mean incidence. The background health incidence is an estimate of the average number of people that are affected by the health endpoint in a given population over a given period of time. In this case, these background incidence rates cover the modeled domain.
Health incidence rates and other health data are typically collected by the government as well as the World Health Organization. The background incidence rates used here are obtained from BenMAP, as reported in SMAQMD's Minor Project Health Screening Tool, version 1.
Localized Fugitive Dust
During earthmoving activities required for construction, localized fugitive dust would be generated. The amount of dust generated by a project is highly variable and dependent on the size of the disturbed area at any given time, the amount of activity, soil conditions, and meteorological conditions. Dust emissions would be controlled through adherence to the City’s Design and Construction Standards, which require chemical stabilizers and other onsite BMPs. Accordingly, the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial fugitive dust concentration. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
Localized Carbon Monoxide
Continuous engine exhaust during project operations may elevate localized CO concentrations, resulting in hot spots. Receptors exposed to these CO hot spots may have a greater likelihood of developing adverse health effects, such as fatigue, headaches, confusion, dizziness, and chest pain. CO hot spots are typically observed at heavily congested intersections where a substantial number of gasoline-powered vehicles idle for prolonged durations throughout the day.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-20 June 2024
ICF 103175
As discussed above under response III.b, the proposed project includes various intersection improvements along Roseville Parkway. Table 2-3 presents the results of the CO hot spot modeling and indicates that CO concentrations are not expected to contribute to any new localized violations of the 1-hour or 8-hour ambient air quality standards. Consequently, the proposed project would not result in CO concentrations in excess of the health-protective California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) or National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and, as such, would not expose sensitive receptors to significant pollutant concentrations or result in health effects. There would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
Table 2-3. CO Concentrations at Roseville Parkway and Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Gibson Drive, and Galleria Boulevard (parts per million) Intersection Receptor
1-Hour 8-Hour
Opening Year with
Project (2035)
Opening Year with
Project (2035)
Roseville Parkway and Pleasant
Grove Blvd
1 2.7 2.2
2 2.7 2.2
3 2.5 2.0
4 2.5 2.0
Roseville Parkway and Gibson Drive 1 2.7 2.2
2 2.4 2.0
3 2.4 2.0
4 2.6 2.1
Roseville Parkway and Galleria Blvd 1 2.6 2.1
2 2.5 2.0
3 2.5 2.0
4 2.6 2.1
CAAQS Threshold 20 9.0
Exceeds CAAQS? No No
NAAQS Threshold 35 9
Exceeds NAAQS? No No
Notes: Receptors are located at each of the four corners of the intersection. All intersections modeled have two intersecting roadways.
The average 1-hour background concentration between 2018 and 2020 was 1.7 parts per million (ppm). The average 8-hour background concentration between 2018 and 2020 was 1.5 ppm (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2022).
Toxic Air Contaminants
Naturally Occurring Asbestos
Naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) is a TAC and is the name given to naturally occurring fibrous silicate minerals. NOA can be released from serpentine and ultramafic rocks when the rock is broken or crushed during construction earthmoving activities. The inhalation of asbestos fibers into the lungs can result in a variety of adverse health effects, including inflammation of the lungs, respiratory ailments, and cancer (e.g., mesothelioma) (United States Environmental Protection Agency 2018). Accordingly to the California Department of Conservation’s A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California, there are no
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-21 June 2024
ICF 103175
geologic features normally associated with NOA (i.e., serpentine rock or ultramafic rock near fault zones) in or near the project area (California Department of Conservation 2000). As such, there is no potential for impacts related to NOA emissions during construction activities. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
Diesel Particulate Matter
DPM is a TAC generated by diesel-fueled equipment and vehicles. Short-term exposure to DPM can cause acute irritation (e.g., eye, throat, and bronchial), neurophysiological symptoms (e.g., lightheadedness and nausea), and respiratory symptoms (e.g., cough and phlegm). Heavy-duty equipment used during construction would generate DPM, which could expose adjacent receptors to associated health risks. However, DPM emissions would be minor (less than 2 pounds per day) during concurrent construction activities. The short-term construction period is well below the 30-year exposure period typically associated with increased cancer risks. Moreover, DPM from construction equipment would be transitory and spread throughout the entire 1.5-mile segment, as opposed to being concentrated at a single location. Accordingly, construction of the proposed project would not expose sensitive populations to substantial pollutant concentrations. There would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts. d. Other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Although offensive odors rarely cause any physical harm, they can be unpleasant, leading to citizen complaints to local governments and air districts. The GPU FEIR includes policies that would avoid exposure of a substantial number of people to objectionable odors. The impact was determined to be less than significant.
Diesel-powered equipment operating during construction may generate odors that are evident in the immediately surrounding area. These activities would be intermittent and temporary in duration and, therefore, would not result in nuisance odors. The project does not meet any of the facility types identified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) (2005) or PCAPCD (2017) as odor-generating; thus, the project would not generate substantial operational odors. Accordingly, the proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people and there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
Mitigation Measures
The project would not result in any new potentially significant impacts on air quality resources not already analyzed in the GPU FEIR. Therefore, no new mitigation measures are necessary.
References
California Air Resources Board. 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April.
California Department of Conservation. 2000. A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California—Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos. August. Division of Mines and Geology. Sacramento, CA.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-22 June 2024
ICF 103175
Cervantes, Raul. Sr. Project Manager. Mark Thomas, Roseville CA. May 13, 2022—email message to ICF with Roseville Parkway Extension construction data.
Placer County Air Pollution Control District. 2017. 2107 CEQA Handbook. November.
Ramboll. 2020. Guidance to Address the Friant Ranch Ruling for CEQA Projects in the Sac Metro Air District. Prepared for the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District. October.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2018. Learn About Asbestos. Last updated September
17. Available: https://www.epa.gov/asbestos/learn-about-asbestos#effects. Accessed: May 2, 2022.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2022. Monitor Values Report. Available:
https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/monitor-values-report. Accessed: May 25, 2022.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-23 June 2024
ICF 103175
IV. Biological Resources
IV. Biological Resources
New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More
Severe
Significant
Impact
Less-than-
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special-status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on
state or federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to, marshes,
vernal pools, coastal wetlands, etc.)
through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement
of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
habitat conservation plan, natural
community conservation plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Setting
Methods
The biological resources analysis is based on a field survey conducted for the project on May 2, 2022, by ICF biologist Sean O’Brien and a review of existing and available information, including information contained in the GPU FEIR. The GPU FEIR analyzed direct and indirect impacts on regulated waterways and wetlands, sensitive habitats and mature native trees, sensitive plants and wildlife, and wildlife movement corridors, and included a discussion of potential conflicts with
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-24 June 2024
ICF 103175
relevant biological resources policies or ordinances. The following sources of information were reviewed to support this analysis.
⚫ A list of sensitive species from the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) records search of the Roseville, Sheridan, Lincoln, Gold Hill, Rocklin, Folsom, Citrus Heights, Rio Linda, and Pleasant Grove U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangles (California Department of Fish and Wildlife 2022).
⚫ California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California for these same USGS quadrangles (California Native Plant Society 2021). ⚫ A list obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPaC) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2022). ⚫ The Western Placer County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan.
⚫ The City of Roseville Individual Open Space and Preserve Location figure (ECORP Consulting Inc., 2009).
This information was used to develop lists of special-status species and vegetation communities of special concern that could be present in the project vicinity, and to determine the location and proximity of City open space and preserve areas.
Existing Biological Conditions
The project area is heavily urbanized with inclusions of undeveloped disturbed annual grasslands (within areas planned for future development; see Exhibit 4.8-4 in the GPU FEIR) and annual grasslands with vernal pool complexes within City preserve areas (see Exhibit 4.8-1 in the GPU FEIR). South Branch Pleasant Grove Creek and an unnamed tributary cross under Roseville Parkway and Highland Ravine crosses under Pleasant Grove Boulevard through culverts (Figure 1-2). All three waterways can be characterized as intermittent drainages, which flow water during the wet-season and contain a combination of ponded water and dry areas during the dry-season. The natural channel and plant communities associated with South Branch Pleasant Grove Creek, the unnamed tributary, and Highland Ravine occur adjacent and outside the developed road corridor. More specifically, these intermittent drainages, seasonal wetlands, and vernal pools occur between 10–55 feet from the concrete sidewalk and 20–65 feet from the edge of pavement.
As shown in Figure 1-2, Highland Reserve South preserve areas occur along Roseville Parkway and Pleasant Grove Boulevard, mostly associated with South Branch Pleasant Grove Creek, the unnamed tributary, and Highland Ravine.
Scattered mature trees (e.g., willows, cottonwoods, live oak, valley oak) occur adjacent to and outside the project area along South Branch Pleasant Grove Creek, the unnamed tributary, and Highland Ravine. Large landscape trees proposed for removal also occur within the project area.
Special-Status Species
As defined in the GPU FEIR, special-status plants and animals are those species in any of the categories listed below.
⚫ Species officially listed by the State of California or the federal government as endangered, threatened, or rare.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-25 June 2024
ICF 103175
⚫ Candidates for state or federal listing as endangered or threatened. ⚫ Taxa (i.e., taxonomic categories or groups) that meet the criteria for listing, even if not currently included on any list, as described in Section 15380 of the State CEQA Guidelines. ⚫ Species identified by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) as species of special concern.
⚫ Species listed as Fully Protected under the California Fish and Game Code. ⚫ Species afforded protection under local or regional planning documents. ⚫ Taxa considered by CDFW to be “rare, threatened, or endangered in California” and assigned a California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR). The CDFW system includes six rarity and endangerment ranks for categorizing plant species of concern, which are summarized as follows:
CRPR 1A – Plants presumed to be extinct in California CRPR 1B – Plants that are rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere CRPR 2A – Plants presumed to be extinct in California, but more common elsewhere CRPR 2B – Plants that are rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere
CRPR 3 – Plants about which more information is needed (a review list) CRPR 4 – Plants of limited distribution (a watch list) Based on a review of existing information, including CNDDB occurrences (California Department of Fish and Wildlife 2022), CNPS occurrences (California Native Plant Society 2022), USFWS species list (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2022) for the study area, and the results of the field survey, eight special-status plant and wildlife species were determined to have the potential to occur in adjacent undeveloped areas. No suitable habitat for fish species occurs in the project area. Suitable habitat is present in undeveloped areas for the follow special-status species:
⚫ Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi), federally listed as threatened ⚫ Vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi), federally listed as endangered ⚫ Western spadefoot (Spea hammondii), CDFW Species of Special Concern ⚫ Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), CDFW Species of Special Concern ⚫ Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni), state listed as threatened ⚫ White-tailed kite (Elanus lucurus), CDFW Fully Protected ⚫ Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop (Gratiola heterosepala), state listed as endangered found in vernal pools
⚫ Dwarf downingia (Downingia pusilla), CRPR list 2B.2 species Adjacent undeveloped City preserve areas (e.g., Highland Reserve South) that contain annual grasslands, vernal pool complexes, seasonal wetland and creek habitat have the potential to support these special-status plant and wildlife species.
Adjacent vernal pool complexes and seasonal wetlands have the potential to support vernal pool fairy shrimp, vernal pool tadpole shrimp, Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop, and dwarf downingia.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-26 June 2024
ICF 103175
Annual grasslands could support burrow sites for burrowing owl and foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk and white-tailed kite. Scattered mature trees adjacent to and outside the project area along South Branch Pleasant Grove Creek, the unnamed tributary, and Highland Ravine could support nesting habitat for Swainson’s hawk and white-tailed kite.
Scattered mature trees adjacent and outside the project area along South Branch Pleasant Grove Creek, the unnamed tributary, and Highland Ravine could provide habitat for nesting habitat for migratory bird species and roosting habitat for bat species. Large landscape trees proposed for removal could also support nesting habitat for migratory bird species and roosting habitat for special-status bat species.
Impact Analysis
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
The GPU FEIR describes the potential for direct impacts on special-status species and/or habitat modification that could degrade the quality of habitats suitable for special-status species, and indirect effects that may result from construction-related runoff, sedimentation and erosion, introduction of invasive weeds, and new sources of noise and light; this impact is potentially significant. The proposed project activities would be limited to existing paved and landscaped areas and would not directly or indirectly affect adjacent undeveloped natural lands and preserve areas that could support special-status species.
The project would remove large landscape trees that could provide suitable roosting habitat for special-status bat species and nesting habitat for migratory bird species. As described in the GPU FEIR, the City will implement Mitigation Measure 4.8-2 to ensure that the project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW or USFWS. Mitigation Measure 4.8-2 requires that the City preserve occupied habitat for special-status wildlife species and, if adverse effects cannot be avoided, mitigate all adverse effects in accordance with guidance from the appropriate state or federal agency charged with the protection of the subject species and habitat, including surveys conducted according to applicable standards and protocols, where necessary, implementation of impact minimization measures based on accepted standards and guidelines and best available science, and compensatory mitigation for unavoidable loss of special-status wildlife species and sensitive habitats. To further avoid impacts on migratory birds and special-status bat species, the City will implement Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2. Potential impacts on special-status species would be reduced to a less-than-significant level with the implementation of these project-specific mitigation measures.
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The GPU FEIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan would involve conversion of riparian habitat and other sensitive natural communities to developed use. In addition to direct removal of habitat, buildout of the General Plan would result in habitat modification that
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-27 June 2024
ICF 103175
could degrade habitat quality to a degree that it is no longer suitable for riparian plants or other sensitive natural communities to regenerate, and these habitats and communities could eventually die out. This impact is considered potentially significant.
The proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or sensitive natural community because none occurs on or immediately adjacent to the project site. There would be no impact.
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
The GPU FEIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan would involve conversion of wetlands and other waters to developed use. In addition to direct removal of wetlands and other waters, buildout of the General Plan would result in wetlands modification that could degrade habitat quality. This impact is considered potentially significant.
The proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act because no jurisdictional wetlands and non-wetland waters occur on the project site. Adjacent undeveloped grassland and High Reserve South preserve areas support state and federally protected wetlands. However, these adjacent wetlands would not be directly or indirectly impacted because project activities would be limited to paved and landscaped areas within the developed parkway corridor.
Mitigation Measure 4.8-3 includes avoiding impacts by establishing a buffer zone between adjacent land uses and riparian habitat and sensitive natural communities. The City would establish buffer zones to avoid indirect effects on state and federally protected wetlands during construction. There would be no new impacts.
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
The GPU FEIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan would involve conversion of habitat to developed use that could provide wildlife movement corridors and nursery sites. In addition to direct removal of habitat, buildout of the General Plan would result in habitat modification that could degrade habitat quality to a degree that it is no longer suitable for use as wildlife movement corridors and/or nursery sites. This impact is considered potentially significant.
The proposed project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Project activities would be limited to paved and landscaped areas within the developed parkway corridor. There would be no impact.
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance (including essential fish habitat)? The GPU FEIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan would involve conversion of habitat to developed use that will require oak tree removal, which would be subject to the City’s ordinances and policies regarding oak tree preservation and mitigation. The City of
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-28 June 2024
ICF 103175
Roseville Tree Preservation Ordinance requires a permit and mitigation for all oak trees removed. Therefore, this impact is considered less than significant.
The proposed project would not result in any new impacts that conflict with local policies or ordinance protecting biological resources, including trees protected under the City of Roseville Tree Preservation Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 19.66, Tree Preservation).
The Tree Preservation Ordinance defines protected trees as a native oak tree, defined as any trees of the genus Quercus that are equal to or greater than six inches diameter at breast height (DBH) measured as a total of a single trunk or multiple trunks.
The project could result in the disturbance or removal of native oak trees that would be subject to the City ordinance. The City will retain an arborist to conduct a survey and prepare an arborist report as specified by Section 19.66.050 of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. In compliance with the ordinance, the City will replace protected trees according to the ordinance. Impact 4.8-6 in the GPU FEIR concluded that this impact is considered less than significant. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
The GPU FEIR concluded that because there is no adopted conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan that applies to the Planning Area, the impact is less than significant. There are no approved habitat conservation plans, natural community conservation plans, or other adopted plans that would apply to the proposed project. There would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Construct the Project During the Nonbreeding Season or Conduct Preconstruction Surveys for Nesting Migratory Birds and Raptors
To the extent feasible, the City will remove trees and large shrubs during the nonbreeding season for migratory birds and raptors (generally between September 1 and February 28).
If construction activities (including vegetation removal) cannot be confined to the nonbreeding season, the City will retain a qualified wildlife biologist with knowledge of the relevant species to conduct nesting surveys before the start of construction. The migratory bird and raptor nesting surveys will include a minimum of two separate surveys to look for active migratory bird and raptor nests. Surveys will include a search of all vegetation that provides suitable nesting habitat in the construction area. In addition, a 500-foot area in open space areas within the construction zone will be surveyed for raptors (including burrowing owl). For survey areas outside the project site, the biologist will walk areas where property access is authorized. For portions of the survey area without property access, the biologist will scan vegetation using binoculars from the project site or from the public road. One survey should be conducted no more than 14 days prior to construction and the second survey should be conducted within 48 hours of the start of construction or vegetation removal. If no active nests are detected during these surveys, no protective measures are required.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-29 June 2024
ICF 103175
If an active nest is found in the survey area, a no-disturbance buffer will be established around the nest site to avoid disturbance or destruction of the nest until the end of the breeding season (August 31) or after a qualified wildlife biologist determines that the young have fledged and moved out of the nesting substrate (this date varies by species). The extent of these buffers will be determined by the biologist and will depend on the level of construction disturbance, line of sight between the nest and the disturbance, ambient levels of noise and other disturbances, and other topographical or artificial barriers. Suitable buffer distances may vary between species but will be established a minimum of 50 feet from active construction for passerine species and up to 500 feet for non-listed raptor species. A minimum buffer of 1,000 feet will be established for an active Swainson’s hawk nest. If site-specific conditions or the nature of the activity (e.g., steep topography, dense vegetation, or minimal construction activities) indicate that a smaller buffer could be used, the City will coordinate with CDFW to determine the appropriate buffer size.
Mitigation Measure BIO-2: Conduct Preconstruction Surveys for Roosting Bats and Implement Protection Measures
To obtain the highest likelihood of detection, the following preconstruction bat surveys will be conducted within and adjacent to the construction area for each construction season. If the surveys determine that bats are roosting in the construction area, the City will implement the protective measures described below.
Conduct Preconstruction Tree Surveys
Prior to tree removal or pruning, qualified biologists will examine trees to be removed or pruned for suitable bat roosting habitat. High-value habitat features (e.g., large tree cavities, basal hollows, loose or peeling bark, and larger snags,) will be identified, and the area around these features will be searched for bats and bat sign (e.g., guano, culled insect parts, and staining). All mature broadleaf trees should be considered potential habitat for solitary foliage-roosting bat species.
If bat sign is detected, biologists will conduct evening visual emergence survey of the source habitat feature, from a half hour before sunset to 1–2 hours after sunset for a minimum of 2 nights during the season that construction would be taking place. Night-vision goggles and/or full-spectrum acoustic detectors will be used during emergence surveys to assist in species identification. All emergence surveys will be conducted during favorable weather conditions (calm nights with temperatures conducive to bat activity and no precipitation predicted). Survey methodology may be supplemented as new research identifies advanced survey techniques and equipment that would aid in bat detections.
Identify Protective Measures for Bats Using Trees
If it is determined that bats are using trees within or adjacent to the construction area as roost sites, the City (or its designated contractor) will coordinate with CDFW to identify protective measures to avoid and minimize impacts on roosting bats based on the type of roost and timing of activities. These measures could include the following. ⚫ If feasible, tree removal and pruning of trees containing an active roost will be avoided between April 1 and September 15 (the maternity period) to avoid impacts on reproductively active females and dependent young.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-30 June 2024
ICF 103175
⚫ If a maternity roost is located, whether solitary or colonial, that roost will remain undisturbed until September 15 or until a qualified biologist has determined that the roost is no longer active.
⚫ If avoidance of nonmaternity roost trees is not possible, tree removal or pruning will be monitored by a qualified biologist. Prior to removal or pruning, the tree will be gently shaken, and several minutes should pass before felling trees or pruning limbs to allow bats time to arouse and leave the tree. The tree then will be removed in pieces, rather than felling the entire tree. The biologists will search downed vegetation for dead and injured bats. The presence of dead or injured bats that are species of special concern will be reported to CDFW.
Conduct Preconstruction Surveys of Culverts
Prior to any work to replace, extend, or remove culverts, a qualified biologist will inspect box and pipe culverts for the presence of roosting bats. The biologist will conduct a daytime inspection/survey of box culverts for bat sign or occupancy to determine whether the structure is being used as a roost. The biologist conducting daytime surveys will listen for audible bat calls and will use the naked eye, binoculars, telescoping inspection mirror, and a high-powered spotlight to inspect culverts, and mud nests if present, for bats.
Surfaces and the ground around the culvert will be surveyed for bat sign, such as guano, staining, and prey remains. Pipe culverts will be inspected from the exterior using the methods listed. If no suitable features are found, and no bats or bat sign are present, then a preconstruction survey within 24 hours prior to construction will be conducted. If suitable features are found, and bats or bat sign are present, additional surveys may be conducted to determine how the culvert is used by bats (i.e., whether it is used as a night roost, maternity roost, migration stopover, or for hibernation).
Implement Protective Measures for Bats Using Culverts
To avoid disturbance, injury, or mortality of bats utilizing culverts for roosting, the City (or its contractor) will conduct all work on these structures during the day (to the extent possible and where appropriate). If this is not possible, portable lights will be used to illuminate the roosting areas prior to and after sunset to deter bats from roosting during nights when work will occur.
References
City of Roseville. 2020. City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report. Prepared by AECOM. Dated August 5, 2020.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. California Natural Diversity Database, RareFind
5. Available: https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/RareFind.aspx. Accessed: May 2022.
California Native Plant Society. 2021. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (Online Edition, Version v7-15). Available: http://cnps.web.aplus.net/cgi-bin/inv/inventory.cgi. Accessed: May 2022.
ECORP Consulting, Inc. 2009. Individual Open Space Preserve Locations. City of Roseville Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan. Dated: 03/05/2009.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2022. IPaC Trust Resource Report. List of Federal Endangered and Threatened Species That Occur in or May Be Affected by the Project. Available:
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Accessed: May 2022.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-31 June 2024
ICF 103175
V. Cultural Resources
V. Cultural Resources
New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More
Severe
Significant
Impact
Less-than-
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
c. Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
Setting
Methods
Records Search
A records search for the project site was conducted by staff at the North Central Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System on May 27, 2022 (record search No. PLA-22-56). The records search indicated that between 1982 and 2006 five previous cultural resources studies have been conducted encompassing the project site. The records search also identified one previously recorded cultural resource (P-31-773) within the project site. This resource was a segment of multiple recorded portions of historic rock walls, alignments, and fence lines attributed to Chinese laborers who were employed by Joel Parker Whitney between 1875 and 1880. According to previous site records from 1982, three separate portions of rock wall were identified as intersecting the project in the southeast quarter of Section
26. Native American Consultation
Assembly Bill (AB) 52 tribal consultation efforts under CEQA were carried out by the City of Roseville and are discussed in Section XVIII, Tribal Cultural Resources.
Field Survey
Overall, five surveys encompassed the entirety of the project site between 1982 and 2006.
However, given the amount of time that had passed since the previous surveys, an updated survey of all accessible portions of the project site was conducted by ICF archaeologists on October 31, 2022. At the time of the survey, all undeveloped portions of the project that had not been paved or built over were inspected, and attempts were made to identify any of the previously recorded portions of rock wall (P-31-773). The ground surface was found to be highly disturbed by past construction and improvement activities, including paved roads, built sidewalks, utility installation, and landscaping. No evidence of site P-31-773 was found within the survey areas, and any portions of the rock wall were most likely removed and destroyed by the
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-32 June 2024
ICF 103175
development of the surrounding area in the early to mid-1990s. Furthermore, no additional cultural resources were discovered throughout the pedestrian survey.
Prehistoric Setting
Although human occupation of the northern Sacramento Valley may extend back 10,000 years or more, reliable evidence of the presence of such an early human presence is lacking. Early archaeological sites bearing evidence of these Paleo-Indian populations may be present in the valley, but deeply buried under alluvium (Moratto 1984).
The region and its prehistory can be broken into local districts and phases (Elsasser 1978).
These different cultural patterns are characterized as follows:
⚫ The Paleo-Indian Period (12,000 to 10,500 Before Present [B.P.]) saw the first demonstrated entry and spread of humans into California. Characteristic artifacts recovered from archaeological sites of this time period have included fluted projectile points (often compared to Clovis points), cobble cores, and biface rough-outs. ⚫ The beginning of the Lower Archaic Period (10,500 to 7500 B.P.) coincides with that of the Middle Holocene climatic change which resulted in widespread floodplain deposition. This episode resulted in burial of most of the early archaeological deposits. Most tools were manufactured of local materials, and distinctive artifact types include large dart points and the milling slab and handstone.
⚫ The Middle Archaic Period (7500 to 2500 B.P.) is characterized by warm, dry conditions that brought about the drying up of pluvial lakes. Economies were more diversified and may have included the introduction of acorn processing technology, although hunting remained an important source of food. Characteristic artifacts include milling stones and pestles and continued use of a variety of implements interpreted as large dart points. ⚫ The Upper Archaic Period (2500 to 850 B.P.) corresponds with a sudden turn to a cooler, wetter, and more stable climate. The development of status distinctions based upon wealth is well documented in the archaeological record. Specialized tools, such as bone implements and stone plummets as well as manufactured goods (e.g., Olivella saucer and saddle beads, Haliotis ornaments) were prolific during this time. The regional variance of economies was largely due to the seasonality of resources, which were harvested and processed in large quantities.
⚫ Several technological and social changes distinguish the Emergent Period (850 B.P. to Historic) from earlier cultural manifestations. The bow and arrow were introduced and territorial boundaries between groups became well established. In the latter portion of this period (450 to 1800 A.D.), exchange relations became highly regularized and sophisticated.
The clam disk bead developed as a monetary unit of exchange and increasing quantities of goods moved greater distances. It was at the end of the Period that contact with Euro- Americans became commonplace, eventually leading to intense pressures on Native American populations.
Ethnographic Setting
The Nisenan occupied the project area at the time of Euro-American contact and spoke a Maiduan language (Wilson and Towne 1978:387). The Maiduan family of languages is part of
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-33 June 2024
ICF 103175
the Penutian stock (Shipley 1978:82, 83). Penutian speakers occupied the Central Valley, Central Sierra Nevada, and the San Francisco Bay area at the time of Euro-American contact.
The Nisenan occupied the lower Feather River drainage and the drainages of the Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers. The boundary with the Miwok to the south was near the Cosumnes River.
The western boundary was the Sacramento River, and the eastern boundary was the crest of the Sierra Nevada (Wilson and Towne 1978:387; Kroeber 1976 [1976]: Plate 37).
The principal Nisenan villages and associated smaller settlements controlled resources within a territory containing between 20 and 500 residents (Wilson and Towne 1978:388). Families in each territory controlled specific oak groves and fishing sites. A headman who lived in the principal village arbitrated disputes, directed festivities, provided advice, and consulted with family leaders. His authority was limited, however, absent the support of the family leaders and the shamans (Wilson and Towne 1978:393).
In the Sacramento Valley, principal villages were located on low natural rises along rivers and streams. In the project vicinity, villages were located along the American River, approximately 5 miles southeast of the project area at the nearest approach. Valley villages consisted of 5 to 50 houses that were dome-shaped and covered with earth, mats, and grass. Brush shelters were used in the summer and when people were away from the village. Major villages had semi- subterranean dance houses with post-and-beam construction (Wilson and Towne 1978:388).
Villages in the foothills were located on ridges and on flats along streams. Houses were conical and covered with brush bark and skins. Most villages had bedrock milling stations. Other site types included seasonal camps, quarries, ceremonial grounds, fishing stations, trading sites, and cemeteries (Wilson and Towne 1978:389). Some people lived away from the main village.
Early Nisenan contact with Europeans appears to have been limited to the southern reaches of Nisenan territory. Spanish expeditions began to cross Nisenan territory in the early 1800s. Unlike the Valley Nisenan, Hill Nisenan groups remained relatively unaffected by the European presence until the discovery of gold at Coloma in 1848. In the 2 or 3 years following the gold discovery, Nisenan territory was overrun by settlers from throughout the world. Gold seekers and the settlements established to support them, as well as the disease and violence accompanying them, almost caused extinction of the area’s native inhabitants. Nisenan survivors worked as wage laborers and domestic help, living on the edges of foothill towns. Despite severe depredations, descendants of the Nisenan still live in Placer County and maintain their cultural identity.
Historic Setting
The first Euro-Americans to settle in the area now known as Roseville were gold seekers who left the placer mining fields to farm on the plains region of southwestern Placer County. Many of these pioneering farmers formed the nucleus of what would become a bustling railroad town. In Roseville, the rails of the Central Pacific intersected with those of the California Central. A small freight and passenger center, soon to be known as Roseville, developed around this junction. By the turn of the century, Roseville’s population was still largely made up of ranchers. However, this setting abruptly changed in 1906 when the railroad roundhouse and repair facilities moved to Roseville from nearby Rocklin, which had been the area’s major railroad service center. Almost overnight, the quiet ranching town evolved into a bustling city of approximately 3,000 people. (Davis 1981:59–61.)
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-34 June 2024
ICF 103175
In 1909, the town was incorporated and steadily grew until it became Placer County’s largest city. Roseville continued as a major railroad center well into the post-World War II years. The introduction of jet aircraft and the completion of Interstate 80 through Roseville in 1956 saw the abrupt decline of the once booming passenger train service. The town slowly expanded easterly with the competition of the interstate leading to the decline of the Lincoln-Church-Main Street business center and the Vernon Street area. The town’s commercial center shifted from downtown to what became known as “East Roseville.” In 1977, a revitalization effort of old downtown saw new business development and reconstruction efforts. Roseville continues to grow today and has a population of over 130,000 people (City of Roseville 2020). The meager beginnings of this ranching village—turned railroad town—blossomed into a vital economic center within Placer County.
Impact Analysis
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
The GPU FEIR concluded that impacts on historical resources would be significant and unavoidable despite implementation of current state and federal regulations, as well as the policies of the proposed General Plan Update due to the possibility that avoidance of some resources could be infeasible. Direct physical impacts would result from activity such as demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of historical resources that would materially impair the qualities that contribute to the significance of these historical resources. However, for this project, the GPU FEIR did not identify significant historical resources in the project area along Roseville Parkway and Pleasant Grove Boulevard. The proposed project involves road widening, construction of turn lanes, and improvements to an existing roadway. This project does not entail demolition of buildings or disturbance of extant historic resources. As a result, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. There would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
The GPU FEIR concluded that impacts on archaeological resources would be significant and unavoidable because, despite implementation of current state and federal regulations, as well as the policies of the proposed General Plan Update, prehistoric and historic-era archaeological sites can occur below ground with little or no surface manifestation. If unknown archaeological resources are encountered during construction without prior discovery, they may be inadvertently damaged or destroyed.
Numerous archaeological sites have been identified as part of investigations conducted for various Specific Plans in the city. The proposed project is in the North Central Roseville Specific Plan (NCRSP) area. Cultural resources surveys conducted between 1979 and 1982 for the NCRSP identified seven prehistoric sites and a rock wall built by immigrants during the historic period.
Project components include ground-disturbing activities such as minor grading and relocation of underground utilities. Depths of disturbance range from 1 to 2 feet for grading and 3 to 6 feet for utility relocations. All work would remain along the roadway alignment within identified disturbance areas. Storm drain facilities constructed as part of the proposed
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-35 June 2024
ICF 103175
roadway widening would tie into and discharge to existing storm drain facilities. Although ground disturbance would occur in areas already heavily disturbed by previous road and utility construction, the project area is considered moderately sensitive for buried archaeological resources due to its proximity to Antelope Creek.
Given the potential depth of excavation, ranging from grading (1 foot) to utility installation (6 feet), and moderate sensitivity near Antelope Creek for archaeological resources, it is possible that ground-disturbing activities may inadvertently uncover buried, previously unknown cultural resources. In the event that construction activities occur within previously undisturbed soils and buried cultural resources are discovered, such resources could be damaged or destroyed, potentially resulting in significant impacts on cultural resources.
However, implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.9-2a and 4.9-2b from the GPU FEIR, would establish appropriate review procedures and consultation requirements, while also addressing the need for qualified personnel to undertake technical analysis, where necessary, which would reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? There are no known formal cemeteries within the project site. However, there is the possibility that ground-disturbing activities during construction may uncover previously unknown buried human remains; such disturbance would be a potentially significant impact.
Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.9-3 from the GPU FEIR would reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
Mitigation Measures
The project would not result in any new potentially significant impacts on cultural resources not already analyzed in the GPU FEIR. Therefore, no new mitigation measures are necessary.
References
City of Roseville. 2020. City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report. Prepared by AECOM. August 5.
Davis, Leonard M. 1981. Rocklin Past, Present, Future. Roseville Printing Company, Roseville.
Kroeber, A. L. 1976. Handbook of the Indians of California. Reprinted. Dover Publications, New York. Originally published in 1925, Bulletin No. 78, Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Moratto, Michael J. 1984. California Archaeology. Coyote Press, Salinas, CA.
Shipley, William F. 1978. Native Languages of California. Pages 80–90 in Robert F. Heizer (ed.), California. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C.
Wilson, N. L., and A. H. Towne. 1978. Nisenan. Pages 387–397 in Robert F. Heizer (ed.), California. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
City of Roseville
Environmental Checklist
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Roseville Parkway Widening Project 2-36 June 2024
ICF 103175
VI. Energy
VI. Energy
New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More
Severe
Significant
Impact
Less-than-
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
Would the project:
a. Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption
of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
Setting
The proposed widening of Roseville Parkway is locally important in order to improve existing and future traffic conditions consistent with City adopted plans, and enhance access and safety for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists.
Within the City of Roseville, electrical service is provided by the City of Roseville Electric Department (Roseville Electric Utility). Demand for any given year is approximately 40 percent residential, 60 percent commercial, and a very small percentage municipal. Natural gas service is provided to the City by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), through portions of its natural gas distribution pipelines. (City of Roseville 2020.) Impact Analysis
a. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
The GPU FEIR concluded that with implementation of the policies of the General Plan Update and Mitigation Measure 4.5-1, implementation of the General Plan Update would develop more energy efficient land uses and development patterns, and impacts would be less than significant. During construction there would be a temporary consumption of energy resources for the movement of equipment and materials. Compliance with local, state, and federal regulations, which limit engine idling times and require recycling construction debris, would reduce short-term energy demand during the project’s construction to the extent feasible, and project construction would not result in a wasteful or inefficient use of energy.
There are no unusual project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities or use of equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards and related fuel efficiencies. Therefore, there would be no change from the GPU FEIR conclusion, and the project would not result in any new impacts.
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?