Roseville City Council
July 15, 2026

Life Scan Wellness Centers
1011 N Macdill Ave Tampa, FL 33607
813-876-0625

OPTIONAL TESTS AVAILABLE LINE ITEM COST
Drug Screen, I CUP $65.00
Drug Rescreen with confirmation $74.00
Medical Review Officer (MRO) as indicated/secondary review $149.00 Phlebotomist (Blood Draw) Fee $34.00
Labs Drawn without Appointment $100.00
Form Fee - Add'l forms needing to be filled out by APRN (per form) $50.00 Secure Wifi if not provided by department (per week) $50.00

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.9
File #: 0324 & 0214
Item ID: 2026-498

Title: Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation - Grant Application Approval Contact: Josh Marone 916-774-4759 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval to pursue a grant through Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation to support the purchase of new rescue extrication equipment. This equipment is essential for providing rapid and effective response during vehicle collisions and other technical rescue incidents. The department’s current extrication tools have exceeded their expected service life, resulting in decreased efficiency, higher maintenance needs, and potential reliability concerns during critical operations. The total estimated cost for the replacement equipment is $39,870.52 which will include (1) one TR50 Telescopic Ram, (1) one PCU50 Cutter, (1) one PSP40 Spreader, and (1) one PBPA288 Battery. Securing this grant will allow the department to replace outdated tools with modern, safer, and more capable equipment, ultimately supporting improved service to the community and enhancing firefighter and public safety.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the submittal of an application to Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation for the FY2026 Firehouse Sub Grant for the requested amount of $39,870.52 and, if awarded, authorize the City Manager or designee the authority to execute all related grant forms and agreements necessary to comply with all grant terms and conditions.

BACKGROUND
The Roseville Fire Department is pursuing grant funding through Firehouse Subs to support the replacement and modernization of the department's current rescue extrication equipment. The department responded to over 500 vehicle accidents in FY2025, emergency calls that often require life-saving equipment to extricate persons from their vehicles. These emergencies require safe and up-to-date equipment that needs to be in top working order to quickly and efficiently tend to those needing assistance.

Modern vehicles are built with stronger materials, advanced safety features, and complex structural designs, all of which demand more powerful and technologically advanced extrication tools to safely access trapped occupants. Updated equipment improves operational efficiency and reliability. By investing in newer, more capable tools, the department can continue to meet the community’s growing needs and ensure the highest level of service during life-threatening incidents.

FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no net effect on the General Fund budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Josh Marone, Fire Battalion Chief

Ryan Harrigan, Fire Chief

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Firehouse Grants Application

2. Resolution 26-273

REVIEWERS:

Deanna Schondelmayer, Fire Department Created/Initiated - 6/17/2026 Deanna Schondelmayer, Fire Department Approved - 6/17/2026 Ryan Harrigan, Fire Department Approved - 6/17/2026
Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/29/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/30/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/1/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 7/1/2026

The Portal is Closed Until 7/9/2026
GRANT

APPLICATION
FAQs

APPLICATION

CHECKLIST

S T A R T A N

A P P L I C A T I O N

S I G N I N
Frequently Asked Questions & Tips
STOP HERE & PRINT THIS PAGE. You will not be able to
return to this page.

Please Apply Early. IMPORTANT: Many users are unable to submit the application on the last page. If this happens, please follow the steps in the video LINKED HERE to submit.

What does the Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation support? Our Mission is to impact the lifesaving capabilities, and the lives of local heroes and their communities. This is accomplished by providing lifesaving equipment and prevention education tools to first responders and public safety organizations. All requests must fall within our Foundation's funding guidelines which can be found on our website via firehousesubsfoundation.org/about-us/funding-areas. See below for information regarding items that are not supported by our grants program.

Are there items that your Foundation does not support?
All requests must fall within our Foundation's funding guidelines which can be found on our website via firehousesubsfoundation.org/about-us/funding-areas. Examples of items that are not supported by our board of directors at this time include body cameras, building exhaust removal systems, crash data boxes, dash cams, drones and drone accessories, exercise equipment, goodie bags, guns/firearms/use of force equipment, riot gear, laser pointers (designators), inflatable bounce houses, license plate readers, Narcan, portable message signs, Pluggie the fire plug robot, Polar Breeze thermal rehabilitation systems, police radar equipment, power load stretchers, recording devices, refurbished equipment, security systems, surveillance equipment, Sparky the Fire Dog robots and costumes, stop sticks, tasers, throw bots, traffic road barriers, TruNar analyzers, t-shirts & polos, etc. Note: Our organization is unable to accept requests for Scott SCBA Model AP50 at this time. All other Scott product requests are acceptable.

Is this grant only available for Fire Departments?
No. Law enforcement, EMS, public safety organizations, non-profits and schools are encouraged to apply for lifesaving equipment.

If my organization has received a grant award from Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation in the past, when can we reapply?
We ask that grant recipients wait a minimum of three years from the date of approval before reapplying.

Does the Foundation provide reimbursements for purchased equipment? Our program DOES NOT provide reimbursements for purchased equipment. If your organization has already purchased the equipment and is requesting reimbursement, please DO NOT apply.

Can my organization submit multiple grant applications? No, the Foundation does not accept more than one grant request per organization. The Foundation is unable to make exceptions to this rule.

Is the Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation grant a matching grant?

There are no matching funds involved in our organization’s grants program.

Does the Foundation accept requests for partial funding? The Foundation does not consider request for partial funding.

If my request is more or less than $20,000, will it be denied? $15,000-$25,000 is a guideline. Requests exceeding $40,000 will not be accepted.

What financial information should we provide?
Financials must show revenue and expenses and must include the name of your organization, city or county. One of the following options must be submitted:

A recent - within one month - Balance Sheet which consists of Assets and Liabilities A recent - within one month - Profit & Loss Statement also called an Income Statement A current year annual budget showing projected income and expenses A previous year audit or 990
What is needed for the required vendor quote/bid attachment? An official vendor quote must be submitted with the following information for your grant request to be considered.

Note: When requesting a quote/bid from a vendor, please share our quote requirements and notify the vendor that you are applying for a grant from our Foundation. Please ensure the quote reflects the most up-to-date and accurate pricing. As a non-profit charity we are responsible for the allocation of donor dollars. This includes procuring granted equipment at a savings, whenever possible.

Submitted quotes MUST meet the requirements below, please read carefully:
o  Vendor sales representative first and last name must be included on quote o  Vendor email address must be included on quote
o  The name & physical address of your organization must be included o  The first & last name of a contact person from your organization must be included o  Only one vendor quote may be submitted. Your application will be marked incomplete if more than one quote is submitted. o  Quote must be itemized
o  Online quotes will not be accepted
o  Must be dated within six months of the application deadline o  Must contain only the item(s) pertaining to your grant request o  The total dollar amount and equipment quantities in the vendor quote MUST MATCH the total that your department is requesting on the application. Please ensure the quote reflects the most up-to-date and accurate pricing
o  Include sales tax, freight charges and any anticipated installation fees, if applicable. Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation will not be responsible for additional shipping costs, sales tax, or installation not included in the submitted quote. All costs, including accessories, must be itemized o  The cost of maintenance plans and extended warranties are not permissible o  Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation will not be responsible for restocking fees or costs related to errors within your quote Important: Only one vendor quote may be submitted for related items only, within one equipment category. Unrelated equipment cannot be combined into one quote. Examples of unacceptable requests include quotes for un-related equipment:

Cutter, Spreader and Fire Hoses*
AEDs and gas monitors*

Requests with more than one quote
* these items do not belong in the same equipment category What inventory information should I provide?
Equipment inventory is required for first responder organizations only. If your organization does not have apparatus, vehicles or specialized equipment, please attach a document noting that the organization does not have any applicable inventory and include the name of your organization on the document.

For first responders: The inventory documentation must list the name of your organization. Please include a list of apparatus, vehicles and other specialized equipment, if applicable. The lists we receive vary in length depending on the size and type of organization. (For example, include items such as vehicles, extrication equipment, breathing devices, and personal protective equipment/PPE).

If my department is located more than 60 miles from a Firehouse Subs restaurant, should I still apply? Our Foundation mainly focuses its resources in areas served by Firehouse Subs restaurants. We recognize the need of rural and volunteer departments throughout the country and will consider applications outside of the 60-mile guideline.

When can we expect to find out if our grant has been approved or denied? Grant award notifications will be emailed to ALL applicants prior to the portal reopening date each quarter. Please do not contact restaurants or the Firehouse Subs Care Center with questions regarding your grant.

Does Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation fund requests for "use of force"? As per our guidelines, Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation does not accept grant requests for "use of force" items such as guns, tasers, riot gear, firearm simulators, or other use of force items.

Does the Foundation only work with specific equipment vendors? No, the Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation does not endorse any specific equipment vendor or brand. Our goal is to provide the equipment that best fits the needs of our recipients, at the best possible price, to enable us to help more organizations. As needed, the Foundation’s procurement team will evaluate pricing and reach out to other distributors of the same manufacturer and brand.

Does the Foundation fund requests for refurbished equipment? No, our organization does not accept grant requests for refurbished or pre-owned equipment.

Does the Foundation fund requests for patent-pending equipment? No, our organization does not accept grant requests for patent-pending products.

If the grant is approved and the vendor provides a discount on the granted equipment, can we order more items? No. Any savings the recipient incurs must be returned as excess funds or credited back to the Foundation for future grant awards.

If approved, what is required by the recipient?
Documentation must be submitted to verify that the grant award was received. More details will be provided if approved.

We are unable to provide any additional assistance due to the volume of applications received daily. For technical questions, please email [email protected]. Please note:
the Foundation does not provide sponsorship support.

What are the most common reasons a grant application is marked incomplete? The requested equipment does not fall within the Foundation’s funding guidelines Quote is missing vendor sales representative first and last name & vendor email address Quote is missing name & physical address of the applying organization, and a contact person from the organization Online quotes are not permissible
Quote does not match the dollar amount or quantity requested in the grant application Quote includes item(s) that are not being requested in the grant Attachments that are not saved as .doc, .pdf, .jpeg or .xlsx Financials are outdated and/or do not include both revenues and expenses Alternate contact information is the same contact information as the main contact information

GRANT APPLICATION FAQS LEGAL DISCLAIMER PRIVACY POLICY ADMIN LOGIN © 2026 Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation
Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Scholarships
Program FAQs
How can an individual apply for a Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation scholarship? The scholarship program is open to community members as well as Firehouse Subs employees planning to enroll in a part-time or full-time firefighter, law enforcement or emergency medical (paramedic or EMT) program at an accredited two or four-year college, university or vocational-technical school for the upcoming academic year. Click here to learn more.

How can accredited schools apply for scholarship funding? Accredited schools can apply for scholarship funding in support of firefighter, law enforcement or emergency medical (paramedic or EMT) programs by completing the online grant applications via grants.firehousesubs.com.

We are unable to provide any additional assistance due to the volume of applications received daily. For technical questions, please
email [email protected].

RESOLUTION NO. 26-273

APPROVING A GRANT APPLICATION TO FIREHOUSE SUBS PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026 FIREHOUSE GRANT, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED

FORMS AND AGREEMENTS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH ALL

GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS

WHEREAS, the Roseville Fire Department is pursuing grant funding through Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation to support the replacement and modernization of the department's current rescue extrication equipment; and

WHEREAS, replacement equipment is estimated to cost $39,870; and

WHEREAS, securing this grant will allow the department to replace outdated tools with modern, safer, and more capable equipment, ultimately supporting improved service to the community and enhancing firefighter and public safety; and

WHEREAS, staff is requesting authorization to submit an application to Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation for the FY2026 Firehouse Grant; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby authorizes staff to submit a grant application to Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation for the FY2026 Firehouse Subs Grant.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or Designee is hereby authorized to execute all related forms and agreements to comply with all grant terms and conditions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

_____________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.10
File #: 0400-02 & 0400-03
Item ID: 2026-510

Title: Second Reading - Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance - Roseville Municipal Code Updates Contact: Eric Singer 916-774-5536 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval an ordinance amending Chapter 18.05 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Ministerial Multifamily Maps; and approval of an ordinance for second reading amending Chapters 19.10, 19.12, and 19.28 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Residential Zone Permitted Use Types, Commercial Zone Permitted Use Types, and Density Bonus Regulations. The proposed ordinance amendments will have no impact on the City’s General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 18.05 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Ministerial Multifamily Maps.

2. Adopt an Ordinance amending Section 19.10.020 of Chapter 19.10, Section 19.12.020 or Chapter

19.12, and Chapter 19.28 of Title 19 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Residential Zone Permitted Use Types, Commercial Zone Permitted Use Types, and Density Bonus Regulations.

BACKGROUND
Each year, staff reviews the Zoning Ordinance to identify updates needed in response to newly passed state legislation.

The following amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance are listed below (also available in the Planning Commission staff report).

Chapter 18.05 (Tentative Map Applications – Ministerial): Pursuant to AB 130, this update includes several changes to the ministerial multifamily map section. First, it allows developers to designate a "remainder parcel" that does not count towards the 10-parcel limit for small-scale subdivisions, provided it does not contain new residential development and is dedicated to servicing the housing project. Secondly, the law specifies that parcels in these subdivisions cannot be sold, leased, or financed unless they contain a new compliant residential unit, an existing legal structure, are designated for common area/open space, or are the last remaining parcel in the subdivision.

Finally, the section is being renamed from “Ministerial Multifamily Map” to “Ministerial 10-Lot Map” to reflect the fact that the amendments apply to projects in both single-family and multifamily zone districts.

The proposed amendments identified for this annual Zoning Ordinance update consist of the changes below (also available within the Planning Commission staff report).

Section 19.10.020 and Section 19.12.020 (Residential Zone and Commercial Zone Permitted Use

Types): Pursuant to AB 752, this update adds a footnote specifying that a daycare center is a principally permitted use of property when co-located with multifamily housing. Additionally, this update adds a footnote clarifying that any residential units can be permitted in a commercial zone with a Conditional Use Permit if the units have been allocated within the specific plan or master plan (e.g. Campus Oaks Master Plan). It also adds a footnote clearly stating the minimum density of 25 units per acre for any multifamily units that are permitted by right in the Regional Commercial (RC) zone.

Chapter 19.28 (Residential Density Bonus): Pursuant to AB 87, SB 92, and SB 838, updates to the Density Bonus section include the following: redefining “mixed-use developments,” and stating they may not include lodging; and that deed restrictions on mixed-use developments must prohibit short term rentals.

Additionally, the City is removing its language requiring a Pro Forma to qualify for a density bonus. A Pro Forma is a financial document that explains the sources of income and expenses and is used to determine whether a housing project is fiscally viable. A Pro Forma used to be required in order to demonstrate that a density bonus was financially necessary but consistent with existing case law, the City has not enforced the Pro Forma requirement of the ordinance for a decade or more. As part of renewing Prohousing Designation, the California Department of Housing and Community Development requested the City delete this obsolete section of the Ordinance.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed ordinance amendments will have no impact on the City’s General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance amendments are policy and procedure- making activities, and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Eric Singer, Associate Planner

Mike Isom, Development Services Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 7085

2. Ordinance 7086

REVIEWERS:

Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 6/24/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/24/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/25/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/1/2026

Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 7/1/2026

ORDINANCE NO. 7085

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING CHAPTER

18.05 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TENTATIVE MAP APPLICATIONS – MINISTERIAL

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 18.05 of Title 18 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “A”.

SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

CHAPTER 18.05
TENTATIVE MAP APPLICATIONS—MINISTERIAL

§ 18.05.010. Tentative map required.

A tentative map shall be required wherever a final map or parcel map is required by the Subdivision Map Act, unless specifically waived by the provisions of this title or the Subdivision Map Act.

§ 18.05.020. Application required.

Whenever a tentative map is required, the subdivider shall submit to the director a complete tentative map application to be processed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and title. An application shall be processed pursuant to Chapter 18.06 unless consistent with one of the following:

A . Ministerial Affordable Housing Map. It is a parcel map associated with a residential multi-unit (three or more units) or mixed-use housing project that provides a minimum of 20% of the units as affordable units for low, very low or extremely low income households and where the applicant agrees to enter into an affordable housing agreement prior to recordation of the parcel map (hereinafter affordable housing project),
B . Ministerial Two-Lot Single-Family Map. The application meets the following qualifying criteria for a ministerial two-lot parcel map:
1 . The parcel is located within a single-family residential zone, which are the city's single-family residential (R1) and small lot residential (RS) zones. 2 . The parcel map subdivides an existing parcel to create no more than two new parcels of approximately equal lot area provided that one parcel shall not be smaller than 40% of the lot area of the original parcel proposed for subdivision. 3 . Both newly-created parcels are a minimum of 1,200 square feet. 4 . The parcel being subdivided has not been established through prior exercise of a parcel map pursuant to this section, nor has the owner or any person acting in concert with the owner previously subdivided an adjacent parcel pursuant to this section.
5 . The proposed parcel map would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
a. Housing subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.

b. Housing which has been occupied by a tenant anytime within the last three years.
c. Housing subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity's valid exercise of its police power.
d. A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner's rights under Government Code Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1, as may be amended from time to time, to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
6 . The parcel is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance.
7 . The parcel is not located on a site that is or contains any of the following, pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.4, subparagraphs (B) to (K), as may be amended from time to time, inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a), as may be amended from time to time:
a. Either prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance, as defined pursuant to United States Department of Agriculture land inventory and monitoring criteria, as modified for California, and designated on the maps prepared by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Department of Conservation, or land zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation by a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction.
b. Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993).
c. Within a very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Government Code Section 51178, as may be amended from time to time, or within a high or very high fire hazard severity zone as indicated on maps adopted by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Section 4202 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time. This subparagraph does not apply to sites excluded from the specified hazard zones by a local agency, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 51179 of the Government Code, as may be amended from time to time, or sites that have adopted fire hazard mitigation measures pursuant to existing building standards or state fire mitigation measures applicable to the development.
d. A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code

Section 65962.5, as may be amended from time to time, or a hazardous waste site designated by the Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Section 25356 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, unless the State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, or Department of Toxic Substances Control has cleared the site for residential use or residential mixed uses. e. Within a delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standards Law (Part 2.5 (commencing with Section 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time), and by any local building department under Government Code Chapter 12.2 (commencing with Section 8875) of Division 1 of Title 2, as may be amended from time to time. f. Within a special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the one percent annual chance flood (100-year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. If a development proponent is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this subparagraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, a local government shall not deny the application on the basis that the development proponent did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by that local government that is applicable to that site. A development may be located on a site described in this subparagraph if either of the following are met:
i. The site has been subject to a Letter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and issued to the local jurisdiction.
ii. The site meets Federal Emergency Management Agency
requirements necessary to meet minimum flood plain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section 59.1) and Part 60 (commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter I of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended from time to time. g. Within a regulatory floodway as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless the development has received a no-rise certification in accordance with Section 60.3(d)(3) of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended from time to time.

If a development proponent is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this subparagraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, a local government shall not deny the application on the basis that the development proponent did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by that local government that is applicable to that site.
h. Lands identified for conservation in an adopted natural community conservation plan pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time), habitat conservation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq., as may be amended from time to time), or other adopted natural resource protection plan. i. Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq., as may be amended from time to time), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time), or the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time.
j. Lands under conservation easement.

C . Ministerial 10-Lot Map. The application is for a ministerial map of 10 or fewer parcels resulting in 10 or fewer residential units and meets all of the following qualifying criteria:
1 . The parcel is one of the following:
a. The parcel is a legal lot located within the city's multi-family residential (R3) zone and meets the following criteria:
i. The parcel is no greater than five acres.
ii. The proposed parcels are no smaller than 600 square feet. b. The parcel is a vacant legal lot, as defined by Government Code Section 66499.41(a)(2)(A)(ii), as may be amended from time to time, located within the City's single-family residential (R1/RS) zone and meets the following criteria:
i. The parcel is no greater than 1.5 acres.
ii. The proposed parcels are no smaller than 1,200 square feet. 2 . The parcel being subdivided has not been established through prior exercise of

a map pursuant to Chapter 18.05.
3 . The parcel is substantially surrounded by urban uses. As defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 21159.25 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time, substantially surrounded means at least 75% of the perimeter of the project site adjoins or is separated only by an improved public right-of-way from any residential, commercial, public institutional, transit or transportation passenger facility, or retail use, or any combination of those uses. The remaining 25% of the perimeter of the project must adjoin or be separated only by an improved public right-of-way from parcels that have been designated for any residential, commercial, public institutional, transit or transportation passenger facility, or retail use, or any combination of those uses, by the Zoning Ordinance, a specific plan/ community plan, or the General Plan.
4 . The project shall result in at least 66% of the maximum allowable units as projected for that parcel in the General Plan Housing Element and shall also provide at least as many low or very low income units identified in the General Plan Housing Element for the parcel (subject to a recorded affordability restriction of at least 45 years). If the parcel is not identified in the General Plan Housing Element, the project shall result in at least 66% of the maximum allowable residential density.
5 . The average total area of floorspace for the proposed housing units on the lot proposed to be subdivided does not exceed 1,750 net habitable square feet.

Habitable space is defined by the California Building Code, as may be amended from time to time, as a space in a building for living, sleeping, eating, or cooking (bathrooms, toilet rooms, closets, halls, storage, or utility spaces and similar areas are not included in net habitable space).
6 . Any parcels proposed to be created pursuant to this section will be served by a public water system and a municipal sewer system.
7 . The proposed project would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
a. Housing subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
b. Housing which has been occupied by a tenant anytime within the last five years.
c. Housing subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity's valid exercise of its police power.
d. A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner's rights under Government Code Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1, as may be amended from time to time, to withdraw accommodations from rent or

lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
8 . The parcel is not located on a site that is or contains any of the following, pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.4, subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a), as may be amended from time to time:
a. Either prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance, as defined pursuant to United States Department of Agriculture land inventory and monitoring criteria, as modified for California, and designated on the maps prepared by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Department of Conservation, or land zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation by a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction.
b. Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993).
c. Within a very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Government Code Section 51178, as may be amended from time to time, or within a high or very high fire hazard severity zone as indicated on maps adopted by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Section 4202 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time. This subparagraph does not apply to sites excluded from the specified hazard zones by a local agency, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 51179 of the Government Code, as may be amended from time to time, or sites that have adopted fire hazard mitigation measures pursuant to existing building standards or state fire mitigation measures applicable to the development.
d. A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 or a hazardous waste site designated by the Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Section 25356 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, unless:
i. The site is an underground storage tank site that received a uniform closure letter issued pursuant to subdivision (g) of Section25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, based on closure criteria established by the State Water Resources Control Board for residential use or residential mixed uses. ii. The State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, Department of Toxic Substances Control, or a local agency making a determination pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, has otherwise determined that the site is suitable

for residential use or residential mixed uses.
e. Within a delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standards Law (Part 2.5 (commencing with Section 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time), and by any local building department under Government Code Chapter 12.2 (commencing with Section 8875) of Division 1 of Title 2, as may be amended from time to time. f. Within a special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the one percent annual chance flood (100-year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. If a development proponent is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this subparagraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, a local government shall not deny the application on the basis that the development proponent did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by that local government that is applicable to that site. A development may be located on a site described in this subparagraph if either of the following are met:
i. The site has been subject to a Letter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and issued to the local jurisdiction.
ii. The site meets Federal Emergency Management Agency
requirements necessary to meet minimum flood plain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section 59.1) and Part 60 (commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter I of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended from time to time. g. Within a regulatory floodway as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless the development has received a no-rise certification in accordance with Section 60.3(d)(3) of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended from time to time.

If a development proponent is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this subparagraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, a local government shall not deny the application on the basis that the development proponent did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by that local government

that is applicable to that site.
h. Lands identified for conservation in an adopted natural community conservation plan pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time), habitat conservation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq., as may be amended from time to time), or other adopted natural resource protection plan. i. Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq., as may be amended from time to time), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time), or the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time).
j. Lands under conservation easement.
9 . The housing units on the lot proposed to be subdivided are to be constructed on fee simple ownership lots, as part of a common interest development, as part of a housing cooperative, or are to be owned by a community land trust, consistent with Government Code Section66499.41(a)(4), as may be amended from time to time.
1 0 . The proposed subdivision conforms to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410, as may be amended from time to time)), except as otherwise expressly provided in this section, and the project conforms to Government Code Section 65852.28, as may be amended from time to time.
1 1 . The proposed subdivision will not result in any existing dwelling unit being alienable separate from the title to any other existing dwelling unit on the lot. 1 2 . The proposed subdivision may designate a remainder parcel, as defined under Government Code Section 66424.6, as may be amended from time to time, that retains existing land uses or structures, does not contain any new residential units, and is not exclusively dedicated to serving the housing development project. The remainder parcel shall not be counted against the 10-parcel maximum permitted.
1 3 . No person shall sell, lease, or finance any parcel or parcels of real property resulting from a subdivision under this section separately from any other such parcel or parcels, unless each parcel that is sold, leased, or financed meets one of the following criteria:
a. The parcel contains a residential structure completed in compliance with all applicable provisions of the California Building Standards Code that includes at least one dwelling unit.
b. The parcel already contains an existing legally permitted

residential structure.
c. The parcel is reserved for internal circulation, open space, or common area.
d. The parcel is the only remaining parcel within the subdivision that is not developed with a residential structure that was completed in compliance with all applicable provisions of the California Building Standards Code.

§ 18.05.030. Application materials required.

Whenever a tentative map is required, the subdivider shall submit to the director a complete tentative map application to be processed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and title.

A complete application shall include the following:

A. Application Form.

1. The application shall be in a form specified by the director and shall be accompanied with the correct filing fee;

2. A description of the applicant's interest in the property shall be stated on the application form;

3. A dated signature by the property owner, or owners, authorizing the processing of the application, and, if so desired by the property owner, authorizing a representative to bind the property owner on matters addressed in the application.

B. Tentative Map: Preparation, Form and Number of Copies.

1. The tentative map shall be clearly and legibly drawn and prepared by or under the direction of a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor.

2. The scale of the map shall be at least one inch equals 40 feet unless otherwise specified by the director. If necessary to provide the proper scale, more than one sheet may be used, but the relation of the several sheets shall be clearly shown on each.

3. No single sheet shall exceed 60 inches in length and 42 inches in width.

4. Full size copies, and one copy reduced to eight and one-half inches by 11 inches (suitable for reproduction) of the tentative map. The number of the tentative map copies shall be specified by the director.

C. The following information shall appear on the face of the tentative map:

1. The proposed subdivision name;

2. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the record owner and subdivider of the land;

3. Name, address and telephone number of the person, firm or organization that prepared the tentative map, and the applicable registration or license number;

4. Date of preparation, north arrow and scale of the map;

5. If the tentative map is based on a survey, the date of the survey;

6. A vicinity map of appropriate scale sufficiently covering adjoining territory to clearly indicate the nearby street patterns, major access streets, property lines, and other adjacent properties in the subdivider's ownership (north arrow pointing in the same direction as the north direction of the subdivision);

7. A statement of existing and proposed zoning and general plan categories, and existing and proposed uses of the property, with the approximate areas of the proposed uses by type;

8. Boundaries and dimensions of the property(ies) involved in the subdivision, with sufficient information to locate the property(ies), and the total area of the subdivision;

9. A list of all service providers and districts, including water, sewer, electric,

natural gas, phone, cable and schools;

10. The name of all adjacent subdivisions, if any, and property lines sufficient to show their relationship to the proposed subdivision;

11. Contour lines at intervals of not more than two feet where the general slope of the property is less than 10 percent, and/or at five-foot intervals where the general slope of the property exceeds 10 percent. Contour lines shall extend beyond the tract boundaries where necessary to show drainage conditions on surrounding property which may affect the subdivision;

12. Topographic information shall be sufficient to fully show the configuration of the land and any and all depressions that present drainage problems;

13. The location and general description of any trees with notations as to their specimen type, and other significant natural features with notations as to their retention or destruction;

14. The location of all structures within the subdivision boundaries, notations if they are to remain or be removed, and their distances from other structures and existing or proposed streets and lot lines;

15. The locations, widths and purposes of all existing and proposed easements for utilities, drainage and other public or private purposes, shown by dashed lines, within and adjacent to the subdivision;

16. The location of any 100-year future floodplain. The city engineer may require additional hydrologic analysis to update or determine the boundaries of the 100-year floodplain;

17. Any area of fill or excavation and their respective quantities within the 100- year future floodplain;

18. The locations, widths and names or designations of all existing or proposed streets, alleys, pedestrian ways and other rights-of-way, whether public or private, within and adjacent to the subdivision (including the radius of each centerline curve);

19. The lines and approximate dimensions of all lots, with sequential numbers assigned to each;

20. The total number of lots (listed by phase, if applicable);

21. The total area in square footage or acreage to the nearest one-tenth acre of each lot proposed to be utilized for other than single-family or two-family housing; and

22. A statement on the face of the tentative map declaring that all easements of record are shown on the tentative map and will appear on the final maps.

D. Additional Information and Plans Required With Ministerial Tentative Map

Application. In addition, the following plans and information shall be submitted with a tentative map application:

1. A statement of proposed improvements, including all utilities and landscaping; and

2. A preliminary title report issued not more than six months prior to its submission to the city; and

3. For a ministerial two-lot map, an affidavit signed by the applicant stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of the approval of the parcel map. This requirement shall not apply to an applicant that is a "community land trust," as defined in clause (ii) of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) of Section 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, as may be amended from time to time, or is a "qualified nonprofit corporation" as described in Section 214.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, as may be amended from time to time. The affidavit shall further state that the applicant understands that uses allowed on the newly-created lots shall be limited to residential uses.

§ 18.05.040. Prefiling.

Within 30 days of receiving a tentative map application the planning department shall, in writing, determine if the application meets the requirements of Section 18.05.020 and Section 18.05.030. When an application is either ineligible for the ministerial parcel map process or is missing any required information it will not be processed. Prefiling occurs on the date that the application is received with all required information.

§ 18.05.050. Application referral.

Within five days of prefiling the director will refer copies of the tentative map application to any city department, local, state or federal agency, or other individual or group the director believes may be interested in the project. If no response is received within 21 days of the referral date, the director will assume that the outside agency, individual or group has no comments.

§ 18.05.060. Acceptance of application.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65943, as may be amended from time to time, a tentative map application shall be accepted as complete by the director if it meets the requirements of Section 18.05.030 of this title.

Within 30 days of prefiling, the director shall send a letter to the applicant indicating:

A. If all of the required information for a tentative map application has been correctly

submitted pursuant to Section 18.05.030; and
B. All information necessary to accept a complete application and to clarify, amplify, correct or supplement the application; and
C. Suggested design changes or conditions of approval which may need to be met in order to receive approval. If the director determines additional information is required, and the additional information has not been received within six months of the letter requesting the information, then the application shall be deemed withdrawn, unless extended pursuant to Section 18.06.150.

§ 18.05.070. Application deemed "filed."
An application shall be deemed filed in accordance with Section 66452.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, as may be amended from time to time, on the date the tentative map application is accepted as complete as specified in Section 18.05.060.

§ 18.05.080. Approval by city engineer.

After an application is filed, the city engineer shall approve the tentative map based upon the minimum findings below, and in accordance with the requirements of this title.

A. The tentative map conforms to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410, as may be amended from time to time)), except as otherwise expressly provided in this section.

B. The tentative map conforms to objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards, except that conformance is not required where imposition of the standards would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of two units on either of the resulting parcels or that would result in a unit size of less than 800 square feet, nor shall it be required to correct existing nonconforming zoning conditions.

C. The tentative map provides necessary easements for the provision of public services and facilities.

D. The parcels have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right-of-way.

E. The project will not have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in Government Code paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, as may be amended from time to time, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.

ORDINANCE NO. 7086

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION

19.10.20 OF CHAPTER 19.10 OF TITLE 19 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING RESIDENTIAL ZONES, AND SECTION 19.12.020 OF CHAPTER 19.12 OF TITLE 19 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING COMMERICAL ZONES, AND CHAPTER 19.28 OF TITLE 19 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE

REGARDING RESIDENTIAL DENISTY BONUS

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Section 19.10.020 of Chapter 19.10 of Title 19 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “A”.

SECTION 2. Section 19.12.020 of Chapter 19.12 of Title 19 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “B”.

SECTION 3. Chapter 19.28 of Title 19 of the Roseville Municipal Code s hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “C”.

SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

§ 19.10.020. Permitted use types.

Primary uses are permitted in residential zones subject to the requirements of this title as designated below:

A. Principally permitted use, designated as "P";
B. Conditionally permitted use, designated as "CUP"; and C. Administratively permitted use, designated as "A."

Primary use types not listed or designated by a dash (-) are not permitted in that zone district.

R1 RS R2 R3 RMU

AGRICULTURE AND OPEN SPACE USE TYPE
Animal Keeping P P P P P
Resource
Protection and
Restoration

P P P P P
Resource Related
Recreation

P P P P P

CIVIC USE TYPES
Community
Assembly

CUP CUP CUP P P
Community
Services

CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Essential Services P P P P P
Schools, Public/
Private Elementary
and Secondary

CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Power Generating
Facilities
(3)

Emergency P P P P P
Passive Power P P P P P

RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES
Accessory
Dwelling Units
(1)

P P P P P
Community Care
Facilities, Small

P P P P P
Community Care
Facilities, Large

A A A P P
Dwelling
(5)
Multi-Family — — — P P

R1 RS R2 R3 RMU
Single-Family P P P P P
Two-Family — — P P P
Caretaker/
Employee Housing

P P P P P
Family Day Care
Homes, Small

P P P P P
Family Day Care
Homes, Large
(2)

P P P P P
Long-Term Care
Facility, Small
(7)

P P P P P
Long-Term Care
Facility, Large

A A A A A
Low-Barrier
Navigation
Centers
(8)
— — — — P
Mobile Home Park CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Rooming and
Boarding House
— — — P P
Short-Term
Rental
(6)

P P P P P

COMMERCIAL USE TYPES
Commercial
Recreation,
Residential
Recreation
Facilities

CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Community Care
Facility
— — — P P
Day Care Center
(9)

CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Long-Term Care
Facility
— — — CUP P
Neighborhood
Commercial
— — — CUP P

TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION USE TYPES
Telecommunication
Facilities
(4)

A/CUP A/CUP A/CUP A/CUP A/CUP

Notes:
(1) Accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling
units are only permitted within areas zoned to
allow single-family, two-family or multi-family
residential use and must be located on a lot that
contains an existing or proposed single-family,
two-family or multi-family dwelling unit as
defined in Sections 19.08.080(F)(1) and (F)(2)
(Residential Use Types). See Chapter 19.60 for
additional accessory dwelling/junior accessory
dwelling unit regulations.
(2) See Chapter 19.46 for large family day care
home regulations.
(3) See Chapter 19.55 for power generating facilities
requirements.
(4) See Chapter 19.34 for antennas and
communications facilities requirements.
(5) Transitional housing and supportive housing are
considered residential use types and are
permitted (P) where residential uses are
permitted (P) or conditionally permitted (CUP).

For supportive housing the total floor area
dedicated to administrative office space shall not
exceed 25% of the total floor area and must
provide the minimum supportive services/
service area defined in Government Code
Section 65651, as may be amended from time to
time.
(6) Short-term rentals are only permitted in a single-
family dwelling unit. See Chapter 4.25 for
additional short-term rental requirements.
(7) A long-term care facility which serves six or
fewer persons shall be considered a residential
use of the property.
(8) Low-barrier navigation centers are exempt from
a Design Review Permit.
(9) A Daycare Center is a principally permitted use
(P) when collocated with multifamily housing.

§ 19.12.020. Permitted use types.

Primary uses are permitted in commercial zones subject to the requirements of this title as designated below:

A. Principally permitted use, designated as "P";
B. Conditionally permitted use, designated as "CUP"; and C. Administratively permitted use, designated as "A."

Refer to the Downtown Code for permitted uses within the CBD and HD zones.

COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICTS PERMITTED USES

BP NC CC GC HC RC CMU

AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN SPACE USE TYPES
Resource
Protection and
Restoration

CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Resource
Related
Recreation

P P P P P CUP P

CIVIC USE TYPES
Community
Assembly
CUP P P P — — P
Community
Services

P CUP P P P P P
Essential
Services

P P P P P P P
Hospital Services
General
Hospital
Services
— — CUP CUP — — P
Psychiatric
Hospital
Services
— — CUP CUP — — P
Libraries and
Museums,
Private
— CUP P P P P —
Public Parking
Services

P P P P P P P
Schools
College and
University
A — P P — P P
Public/Private
Elementary
and
Secondary
— CUP CUP CUP — — P
Social Services

COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICTS PERMITTED USES

BP NC CC GC HC RC CMU
Emergency
Shelter
(5)
— — — CUP CUP — CUP
Food
Distribution
(3)
— — — A/CUP A/CUP — A/CUP
Food Service
(4)
— — — A/CUP A/CUP — A/CUP
Power Generating Facilities
(9)
Emergency A A A A A A A
Supplemental/
Individual
Use

CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP
Passive Power P P P P P P P

RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES
Accessory
Dwelling
Units
(11)
— P P P P — P
Caretaker/
Employee
Housing
— CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Community
Care Facilities,
Small
P P P P — P P
Community
Care Facilities,
Large
CUP CUP CUP CUP — CUP P
Dwelling
(10)
Multi-
Family(13, 14)
— CUP/A CUP/A — — P(15) P
Single-
Family
(14)
— CUP CUP CUP CUP — P
Two-Family
(14)
— CUP CUP CUP CUP — P
Family Day
Care Home,
Small
P P P P — P P
Family Day
Care Home,
Large
— CUP CUP CUP — — P
Single Room
Occupant
— — — — — — CUP
Low-Barrier
Navigation
Center
— — — — — — P

COMMERCIAL USE TYPES
Adult-Oriented
Businesses
(2)
— — — P — P P

COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICTS PERMITTED USES

BP NC CC GC HC RC CMU
Animal Sales
and Service

Grooming and
Pet Stores
— P P P — P P
Kennels — — — CUP CUP CUP P
Veterinary
Clinic
— CUP P P — CUP P
Veterinary
Hospital
— — CUP CUP — — P
Automotive and Equipment
Automotive
Body and
Equipment
Repair
— — — CUP — CUP CUP
Automotive
Rentals
— — — P P P P
Automotive
Repairs
— — CUP P P P P
Automotive
Sales
— — CUP P — P P
Car Wash and
Detailing
— — CUP P — P P
Commercial
Parking
P — — P P — P
Electric
Vehicle
Charging
Center
(12)

P P P P P P P
Fuel Sales
(12)

CUP P/CUP P/CUP P/CUP P/CUP P/CUP P/CUP
Hydrogen
Fuel Sales

P P P P P P P
Heavy
Equipment
Rental and
Sales
— — — P — P P
Banks and
Financial
Services
P P P P — P P
Bars and
Drinking Places
— — P P — P P
Broadcasting
and Recording
Studios
P — — P — — P
Building
Material Stores
— — CUP P — P P

COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICTS PERMITTED USES

BP NC CC GC HC RC CMU
Business
Support
Services
P — P P — — P
Commercial Recreation
Amusement
Center
— CUP P P — P P
Indoor
Entertainment
— — P P — P P
Indoor Sports
and
Recreation
— — P P — P P
Large
Amusement
Complexes
— — — CUP CUP P P
Outdoor
Entertainment
— — — CUP — CUP P
Outdoor
Sports and
Recreation
— — — P CUP P P
Community
Care Facility
P P P P — — P
Day Care Center P P P P — P P
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Fast Food
with Drive-
Through
(12)
— — P/CUP P/CUP P/CUP P/CUP
Convenience P P P P P P P
Full Service P P P P P P P
Food and
Beverage Retail
Sales
— — P P — — P
Funeral and
Interment
Services
— — P P — — P
Lodging
Services
— — P P P P P
Long-Term
Care Facility
CUP CUP P P — — P
Maintenance
and Repair
— P P P — — P
Medical
Services,
General

P P P P P P P
Neighborhood
Commercial
P P — — — — P
Nightclubs
(6)
— — CUP CUP — CUP CUP

COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICTS PERMITTED USES

BP NC CC GC HC RC CMU
Nursery, Retail — — — P — P P
Offices,
Professional
P P P P — P P
Personal
Services

P P P P P P P
Retail Sales and
Services
— — P P P P P
Specialized Education and Training
Vocational
Training
— — P P — — P
Specialty
Schools
— CUP P P — P P
Storage,
Personal
Storage Facility
— — CUP P — — P

INDUSTRIAL USE TYPES
Laundries,
Commercial
— — CUP CUP — — P
Printing and
Publishing
— — — CUP — — P
Research
Services
— — — P — — P
Wholesaling
and
Distribution,
Light
— — — P — — P

TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION USE TYPES
Heliport CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Intermodal
Facilities
(8)

CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Telecommunicati
Facilities
(7)
nP/A/CUP P/A/CUP P/A/CUP P/A/CUP P/A/CUP P/A/CUP P/A/CUP

Notes:
(1) Reserved.
(2) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.32. (3) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.40. (4) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.39. (5) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.38. (6) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.49. (7) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.34. (8) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.36. (9) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.55.

Notes:
(10) Transitional housing and supportive housing are
considered residential use types and are permitted (P)
where residential uses are permitted (P) or conditionally permitted (CUP). For supportive housing the total floor area dedicated to administrative office space shall not exceed 25% of the total floor area and must provide
the minimum supportive services/service area defined in Government Code Section 65651, as may be amended
from time to time.
(11) Accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling units are only permitted within areas zoned to allow single-family, two-family or multi-family residential use and must be
located on a lot that contains an existing or proposed
single-family, two-family or multi family dwelling unit which has an approved CUP as defined in Section

19.08.080(F)(1) and (F)(2) (Residential Use Types). See Chapter 19.60 for additional accessory dwelling/junior
accessory dwelling unit regulations.
(12) A Conditional Use Permit is required for fast food with drive-through establishments, fuel sales establishments, or electric vehicle charging centers contiguous to: (a) proper ties with a residential zoning designation; (b)
parcels designated as a public utilities easement or
landscape easement which are contiguous to a property
having a residential zoning designation; and (c) any other parcel of land upon which a building cannot be developed and which separates the subject parcel by less than 100 feet which is contiguous to a property having a residential zoning designation. A Conditional Use Permit is not
required for these uses if the subject parcel is separated from properties with a residential zoning designation by a public roadway.
(13) Multi-family uses are permitted with an Administrative Permit in the NC and CC zone districts when the housing development is constructed on or adjacent to a site
occupied by a nonprofit organization, and a nonprofit
organization will offer supportive services to the
proposed residents. Examples of supportive services
include transportation, child care, education assistance, and the provision of clothing and other supplies.
(14) For sites within a specific plan or master plan, residential units are only permitted with a CUP if the specific plan or master plan has allocated units to the site. If no units are allocated or if fewer units are allocated than are
proposed, a unit transfer or an amendment to the specific plan or master plan is required in addition to the CUP. (15) Multi-family units are permitted by right in the RC zone district at minimum densities of 25 units per acre if the specific plan has al located units to the site. If no units are allocated or if fewer units are allocated than are proposed, a unit transfer or Specific Plan Amendment will be
required.

CHAPTER 19.28

RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS

§ 19.28.010. Purpose.

This chapter is adopted pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Sections 65915 through 65918, as they now exist or may hereafter be amended. The purpose of adopting this chapter is to encourage affordable housing by providing the incentive of increased density and such other incentives provided by this chapter. The provisions of this chapter are intended to comply with California Government Code Sections 65915 through 65918. In the event that any provision of this chapter conflicts with California Government Code Sections 65915 through 65918, state law shall control over the conflicting provision.

§ 19.28.020. Definitions.

For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings:
"Approving authority" is as defined in the Roseville Municipal Code Title 19, Zoning, Section 19.78.020.
"Child care facility" is defined as a child day care facility other than a family day care home, including, but not limited to, infant centers, preschools, extended day care facilities, and school-age child care centers.
"Density bonus" is defined as an increase in density over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the applicable general plan designation as of the date of filing of an application for density bonus with City or, if elected by the applicant, a lesser percentage of density increase. A density bonus request shall be considered as a component of a qualified housing development.
"Development standard" is defined as the site, development, or construction standards and/or conditions of approval that apply to a residential development, and includes (but is not limited to) a height limitation, a setback requirement, a floor area ratio, an on-site open space requirement, a minimum lot area per unit requirement, or a parking ratio. "Housing development" is defined as a development project for five or more residential units, including mixed-use developments, constructed within a large lot parcel. For the purposes of this chapter, "housing development" also includes a subdivision or common interest development as defined in Section 4100 of the Civil Code and consists of residential units or unimproved residential lots. A density bonus shall be permitted in geographic areas of the housing development other than the areas where the affordable units are located, so long as the density bonus units are located on the same large lot parcel.
"Incentive" is defined as a reduction in site development standards or a modification of zoning code requirements or architectural design requirements that exceed the minimum building standards approved by the California Building Standards Commission. An incentive can be requested by the applicant for purposes of reducing the cost of

development to make the project financially feasible. The term "incentive" includes the term "concession" as that term is used in California Government Code Sections 65915 through 65918.
"Large lot parcel" is defined as that term is used in any applicable specific plan (large lot parcel is hereby generally deemed as a geographic area). "Located within one-half mile of a major transit stop" means that any point on a proposed development, for which an applicant seeks a density bonus, other incentives or concessions, waivers or reductions of development standards, or a vehicular parking ratio pursuant to this chapter, is within one-half mile of any point on the property on which a major transit stop is located, including any parking lot owned by the transit authority or other local agency operating the major transit stop.
"Lower income" or "lower income household" is defined as 80 percent of the area median income or less, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time.
"Lower income unit" is defined as a unit with an affordable rent or payment that does not exceed 30 percent of 60 percent of area median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit.
"Major transit stop" is defined as a site containing any of the following: (1) an existing rail or bus rapid transit station; (2) a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service; or (3) the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. "Maximum allowable residential density" or "base density" means the greatest number of units allowed under the zoning ordinance, specific plan, or land use element of the General Plan, or if a range of density is permitted, means the greatest number of units allowed by the specific zoning range, specific plan, or land use element of the General Plan applicable to the project. Density shall be determined using dwelling units per acre.

However, if the applicable zoning ordinance, specific plan, or land use element of the General Plan does not provide a dwelling-units-per-acre standard for density, then the number of units shall be calculated by:

1. Estimating the realistic development capacity of the site based on the objective development standards applicable to the project, including, but not limited to, floor area ratio, site coverage, maximum building height and number of stories, building setbacks and stepbacks, public and private open space requirements, minimum percentage or square footage of any nonresidential component, and parking requirements, unless not required for the base project. Parking requirements shall include considerations regarding number of spaces, location, design, type, and circulation. A developer may provide a base density study and the City shall accept it, provided that it includes all applicable objective development standards.

2. Maintaining the same average unit size and other project details relevant to the base density study, excepting those that may be modified by waiver or concession to accommodate the bonus units, in the proposed project as in the study.

"Moderate income unit" is defined as a unit with an affordable rent or payment that does not exceed 35 percent of 120 percent of area median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit.
"Moderate income" or "moderate income household" is defined as 120 percent of the area median income or less, as defined in Section 50093 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time.
"Senior citizen housing development" is defined as a housing project where residency is restricted to persons 62 years of age or older, or 55 years of age or older in a senior citizen housing development per Section 51.3 of the California Civil Code, as may be amended from time to time.
"Shared housing building" means a residential or mixed-use structure, with five or more shared housing units and one or more common kitchens and dining areas designed for permanent residence of more than 30 days by its tenants. The kitchens and dining areas within the shared housing building shall be able to adequately accommodate all residents. If any section of this Code further restricts the attributes of a shared housing building beyond the requirements established in this section, the Code definition shall apply to the extent that it does not conflict with the requirements of this section.

1. A "shared housing building" may include other dwelling units that are not shared housing units, provided that those dwelling units do not occupy more than 25 percent of the floor area of the shared housing building. A shared housing building may include 100 percent shared housing units.

2. A "shared housing building" may include incidental commercial uses, provided that those commercial uses are otherwise allowable and are located only on the ground floor or the level of the shared housing building closest to the street or sidewalk of the shared housing building.
"Shared housing unit" means one or more habitable rooms, not within another dwelling unit, that includes a bathroom, sink, refrigerator, and microwave, is used for permanent residence, that meets the "minimum room area" specified in Section R304 of the California Residential Code (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), as may be amended from time to time, and complies with the definition of "guestroom" in Section R202 of the California Residential Code, as may be amended from time to time. If a local ordinance further restricts the attributes of a shared housing building beyond the requirements established in this section, the local definition shall apply to the extent that it does not conflict with the requirements of this section. "Total units" or "total dwelling units" means a calculation of the number of units that:

1. Excludes a unit added by a density bonus awarded pursuant to this section or any local law granting a greater density bonus.

2. Includes a unit designated to satisfy an inclusionary zoning requirement.

For purposes of calculating a density bonus granted pursuant to this section for a shared housing building, "unit" means one shared housing unit and its pro rata share of associated common area facilities.
"Unobstructed access to a major transit stop" means a resident is able to access the major transit stop without encountering natural or constructed impediments. "Natural or constructed impediments" includes, but is not limited to, freeways, rivers, mountains, and bodies of water, but does not include residential structures, shopping centers, parking lots, or rails used for transit.
"Very low income unit" is defined as a unit with an affordable rent or payment that does not exceed 30 percent of 50 percent of the area median income, adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit.
"Very low income" or "very low income household" is defined as 50 percent of the area median income or less, as defined in Section 50105 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time.

§ 19.28.030. Application requirements.

A density bonus may be approved pursuant to a request for approval of a density bonus, provided the request complies with the provisions of this chapter. Each application for a density bonus request shall be accompanied by the following:

A. A site plan that identifies all units in the project including the location of the affordable units and the bonus units.

B. A narrative briefly describing the housing development and shall include information on:

1. The number of units permitted under the General Plan;

2. The total number of units proposed in the project;

3. The number of affordable and/or senior units;

4. The number of bonus units requested based on the tables provided in Section

19.28.050 of this chapter;

5. A breakdown of units proposed for very low, lower, and moderate income; senior citizen or other bonus-eligible housing type listed in this chapter, and/ or market rate units; and

6. Any requested incentive(s), including an explanation as to why the incentive(s) is required for the housing development.

C. Information indicating that appropriate and sufficient infrastructure capacity (water, sewer, roadway) and water supply is available to serve the bonus units.

D. Any such additional information in support of a request for a density bonus as may be requested by the Planning Division.

§ 19.28.040. Eligibility for bonus.

A developer of a housing development containing five or more units may qualify for a density bonus and at least one other incentive as provided by this chapter if the developer does one of the following:

A. Agrees to construct and maintain at least five percent of the units for rental or sale dedicated to very low income households (includes a shared housing building development, in which case minimum unit size or bedroom requirements shall not conflict with the definition of "shared housing building"); B. Agrees to construct and maintain at least 10% of the units for rental or sale dedicated to lower income households (includes a shared housing building development, in which case minimum unit size or bedroom requirements shall not conflict with the definition of "shared housing building");
C. Agrees to construct and maintain at least 10% of the units of a housing development to be sold to moderate income households, provided that all units in the development are offered to the public for purchase, consistent with Government Code Section 65915, as may be amended from time to time;
D. Agrees to construct and maintain a senior citizen housing development, as defined in Sections 51.3 and 51.12 of the California Civil Code, or a mobilehome park that limits residency based on age requirements for housing for older persons pursuant to Section 798.76 or 799.5 of the California Civil Code, as may be amended from time to time. For the purposes of this subparagraph, "development" includes a shared housing building development and a residential care facility for the elderly, as defined in Section 1569.2 of the Health and Safety Code; E. Donates land to the City dedicated for the construction of very low income units pursuant to Section 19.28.080 of this chapter;

F. Includes a qualifying child care facility as described in Section 19.28.070 of this chapter in addition to providing housing as described in subsections A through C of this section;
G. Agrees to construct and maintain at least 10% of the units of a housing development for transitional foster youth, as defined in Section 66025.9 of the California Education Code, as may be amended from time to time, disabled veterans, as defined in Section 18541 of the California Government Code, as may be amended from time to time, or homeless persons, as defined in the Federal McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. Section 11301 et seq.), as may be amended from time to time, dedicated to very low income households; H. Agrees to construct and maintain at least 20% of the units for lower income students in a student housing development pursuant to Section 19.28.085 of this chapter; or I. Agrees to construct and maintain 100% of the units, including total units and density bonus units, but exclusive of a manager's unit or units, dedicated to lower income households, except that up to 20% of the units, including total units and density bonus units, may be dedicated to moderate income households (includes a shared housing building development).

§ 19.28.050. Density bonus calculation and allowance.

A. State Law Preemption. Pursuant to state law, the granting of a density bonus or the granting of a density bonus together with an incentive(s) shall not be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a General Plan amendment, specific plan amendment, rezone, or other discretionary approvals.

B. Density Bonus Calculation. An applicant must choose a density bonus from only one applicable affordability category in subsection C and may not combine categories with the exception of child care facilities or land donation, which may be combined with an affordable housing development.

C. Density Bonus Allowance. In calculating the number of units required for very low, lower and moderate income households, the density bonus units shall not be included. In no event shall a density bonus exceed 80 percent. A housing development that satisfies all applicable provisions of this chapter shall be allowed the following applicable density bonuses:

1. Very Low Income. The density bonus for very low income units shall be calculated as follows:

Percentage of Very Low-Income Units Percentage Density Bonus 5 20
6 22.5

Percentage of Very Low-Income Units Percentage Density Bonus 7 25
8 27.5
9 30
10 32.5
11 35
12 38.75
13 42.5
14 46.25
15 50

2. Lower Income. The density bonus for lower income units shall be calculated as follows:

Percentage of Lower Income Units Percentage Density Bonus 10 20
11 21.5
12 23
13 24.5
14 26
15 27.5
16 29
17 30.5
18 32
19 33.5
20 35
21 38.75
22 42.5
23 46.25
24 50

3. Moderate Income. The density bonus for moderate income ownership units shall be calculated as follows:

Percentage of Moderate-Income Units Percentage Density Bonus 10 5
11 6
12 7
13 8
14 9
15 10
16 11
17 12
18 13
19 14
20 15
21 16
22 17
23 18
24 19
25 20
26 21
27 22
28 23
29 24
30 25
31 26
32 27
33 28
34 29
35 30
36 31
37 32
38 33
39 34
40 35

Percentage of Moderate-Income Units Percentage Density Bonus 41 38.75
42 42.5
43 46.25
44 50

4. Senior Citizen Housing Development. The density bonus for a senior citizen housing development that provides housing for seniors consistent with Section

19.28.040 of this chapter shall be 20 percent.

5. Child Care Facility. A project (whether a housing, commercial, or industrial project) is eligible for a density bonus for a child care facility when in compliance with Section 19.28.070 of this chapter and California Government Code Section 65917.5.

6. Donation of Land. A project is eligible for the following density bonus for the donation of land when in compliance with Section 19.28.080 of this chapter:

Percentage of Very Low-Income Units Percentage Density Bonus 10 15
11 16
12 17
13 18
14 19
15 20
16 21
17 22
18 23
19 24
20 25
21 26
22 27
23 28
24 29
25 30
26 31

Percentage of Very Low-Income Units Percentage Density Bonus 27 32
28 33
29 34
30 35

7. Conversion of Apartments to Condominiums. A project is eligible for a 25 percent density bonus for the conversion of apartments to condominiums when in compliance with California Government Code Section 65915.5

8. Foster Youth, Disabled Veterans, and Homeless Persons. The density bonus for a housing development for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans, or homeless persons shall be 20 percent.

9. Students. The density bonus for a student housing development that provides housing for students consistent with Section 19.28.085 of this chapter shall be 35 percent.

10. One Hundred Percent Affordable. The density bonus for a 100 percent affordable housing development consistent with Section 19.28.040(I) of this chapter shall be 80 percent of the number of units for lower income households.

Except that, if the affordable housing development is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop, maximum density requirements shall not apply.

11. Additional Density Bonus. Projects qualifying for a density bonus pursuant to this chapter may also qualify for an additional bonus, if it meets all of the following eligibility criteria:
a. No more than 50 percent of the housing development units shall be restricted to very low, lower, or moderate income households; b. The additional bonus shall include rental or for-sale units affordable to very low income households or moderate income households; c. The housing development conforms to any of the following:
i. The housing development is consistent with Section 19.28.040(A) and provides 15 percent of the total units to very low income households,
ii. The housing development is consistent with Section 19.28.040(B) and provides 24 percent of the total units to lower income households,
iii. The housing development is consistent with Section 19.28.040(C) and provides 44 percent of the total units to moderate income households.

The additional density bonus calculation shall exclude any additional bonus units, and shall be calculated as follows:

Percentage of Very Low-Income Units Percentage Density Bonus 5 20
6 23.75
7 27.5
8 31.25
9 35
10 38.75

Percentage of Moderate Income Units Percentage Density Bonus 5 20
6 22.5
7 25
8 27.5
9 30
10 32.5
11 35
12 38.75
13 42.5
14 46.25
15 50

§ 19.28.060. Eligibility and application requirements for incentives.

A. Available Incentives. A housing development qualifying for a density bonus may be entitled to at least one incentive. An incentive shall not result in a proposed project with a commercial floor area ratio that is greater than two and a half times the premises’ current allowed base zone commercial floor area ratio. Incentives may include, but are not limited to:

1. A reduction in site development standards such as:
a. Reduced minimum lot sizes and/or dimensions.
b. Reduced minimum lot setbacks.
c. Reduced minimum outdoor and/or private outdoor living area. d. Increased maximum lot coverage.

e. Increased maximum building height and/or stories.
f. Reduced on-site parking requirements.
g. Reduced street standards.

2. A reduction in architectural design requirements.

3. A density bonus greater than the amount required by this chapter.

4. Other regulatory incentives proposed by the developer or the City, which result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions.

B. Parking Requirements. If an applicant qualifies for a density bonus pursuant to this chapter, the applicant may request, in addition to any requested incentive(s), that reduced parking requirements be applied to the project in place of the City's current parking requirements. The parking requirement is inclusive of accessible and guest parking for the entire housing development, but shall not include on-street parking spaces in the count towards the parking requirement. The housing development may provide on-site parking through tandem or uncovered parking, but not through on-street parking. In calculating the number of parking spaces required for a development, if the total number of parking spaces is other than a whole number, the number shall be rounded up to the next whole number.

1. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the following parking requirements shall apply:
a. One bedspace in a student housing development, as defined by Section 65915 of the Government Code, as may be amended from time to time:
zero parking spaces.
b. Zero to one bedroom: one on-site parking space.
c. Two to three bedrooms: one and one-half on-site parking spaces. d. Four or more bedrooms: two and one-half on-site parking spaces.

2. If the housing development includes at least 20% lower income units or at least 11% very low income units, is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop, and there is unobstructed access to the major transit stop from the development, then the parking requirement shall be one-half on-site parking space per unit.

3. If a housing development consists solely of rental units, exclusive of a manager's unit or units, with an affordable housing cost to lower income families, as provided in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code as may be amended from time to time, then no parking spaces shall be required as long as the development meets either of the following criteria:
a. The development is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop and there is unobstructed access to the major transit stop from the

development; or
b. The development is a for-rent housing development for individuals who are 62 years of age or older that complies with Sections 51.2 and 51.3 of the California Civil Code as may be amended from time to time, and the development has either paratransit service or unobstructed access, within one-half mile, to fixed bus route service that operates at least eight times per day.

4. If a housing development consists solely of rental units, exclusive of a manager's unit or units, with an affordable housing cost to lower income families, as provided in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, and the development is either a special needs housing development, as defined in Section 51312 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, or a supportive housing development, as defined in Section 50675.14 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, then no parking spaces shall be required. A development that is a special needs housing development shall have either paratransit service or unobstructed access, within one-half mile, to fixed bus route service that operates at least eight times per day.

5. Upon the request of the developer, the parking requirement (inclusive of parking for persons with a disability and guests) shall be 0.5 spaces per bedroom if all of the following are met:
a. The housing development includes at least 40% moderate income units and at least 10% of the units of the housing development are sold to moderate income households, provided that all units in the development are offered to the public for purchase; and
b. The housing development is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21155(b), as may be amended from time to time; and
c. The residents of the development have unobstructed access to the major transit stop from the development.

C. Eligibility for Incentives. Incentives are available to a housing developer as follows:

1. One incentive for housing developments that: (a) restrict at least 10% of the total units to lower income households, at least five percent for very low income households, or at least 10% for persons and families of moderate income in a development in which the units are for sale; or (b) are for senior housing.

2. Once incentive or concession for projects that include at least 20% of the total units for lower income students in a student housing development. If a project includes at least 23% of the total units for lower income students in a student

housing project, the applicant shall instead receive two incentives or concessions.

3. Two incentives for housing developments that restrict at least 17% of the total units to lower income households, at least 10% for very low income households, or at least 20% for persons and families of moderate income in a development in which the units are for sale.

4. Three incentives for housing developments that restrict at least 24% of the total units for lower income households, at least 15% for very low income households, or at least 30% for persons and families of moderate income in a development in which the units are for sale.

5. Five incentives for housing developments that restrict 100% of the units, including total units and density bonus units, but exclusive of a manager's unit or units, dedicated to lower income households, except that up to 20% of the units, including total units and density bonus units, may be dedicated to moderate income households. If the project is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop, the applicant shall also receive a height increase of up to three additional stories, or 33 feet.

6. One incentive for projects that include at least 20% of the total units for lower income students in a student housing development.

7. Four incentives for projects that include at least 16% of the units for very low income households or at least 45% for persons and families of moderate income in a development in which the units are for sale.

8. The City is not required to grant a concession or incentive requiring approval of, or to waive or reduce development standards otherwise applicable to, a hotel, motel, bed and breakfast inn, or other transient lodging, other than a residential hotel, as defined in Section 50519 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, as part of a housing development subject to this section. For purposes of this paragraph, “other transient lodging” does not include a resident’s use or marketing of their unit as short-term lodging, as defined in Section 17568.8 of the Business and Professions Code, as may be amended from time to time, subsequent to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy in a manner otherwise consistent with local law.

§ 19.28.070. Child care facilities.

A. Child Care Facility Density Bonus. When an applicant proposes to construct a housing development that is eligible for a density bonus under Section 19.28.040 of this chapter and California Government Code Section 65917.5, and includes a child care facility that will be located on the premises or adjacent to the housing development, the City shall grant either:

1. An additional density bonus that is an amount of square feet of residential space that is equal to or greater than the square footage of the child care facility; or

2. An additional incentive that contributes significantly to the economic feasibility of the construction of the child care facility.

B. Child Care Facility Requirements. The City shall require, as a condition of

approving the housing development, that the following occur:

1. The child care facility shall remain in operation for a period of time that is as long as or longer than the period of time during which the affordable units are

required to remain affordable per this chapter; and

2. Of the children who attend the child care facility, the children of very low income households, lower income households or families of moderate income households shall equal a percentage that is equal to or greater than the percentage of affordable units in the housing development that are required for very low, lower or families of moderate income households.

C. Child Care Facility Criteria. The City shall not be required to provide a density bonus or incentive for a child care facility if it finds, based upon substantial evidence, that the community has adequate child care facilities.

§ 19.28.080. Donation of land.

A . Donation of Land Density Bonus. When a developer of a tentative subdivision map, parcel map, or other residential development donates land to the City, the developer shall be entitled to a density bonus above the otherwise maximum allowable residential density, up to a maximum of 35 percent depending on the amount of land donated (see Section 19.28.050 of this chapter). This increase shall be in addition to any increase in density permitted by Section 19.28.040 of this chapter up to a maximum combined density increase of 35 percent if an applicant seeks both the increase required by Section 19.28.040 and this section of this chapter.

B . The developer shall be eligible for the density bonus for the donation of land, if all of the following conditions are met:

1. The developer shall donate and transfer land no later than the date of approval of the final subdivision map, parcel map, or residential development application.

2. The developable acreage and zoning classification of the land being transferred are sufficient to permit construction of units affordable to very low income households in the amount not less than 10 percent of the residential units in the proposed development.

3. The transferred land is at least one acre in size or of sufficient size to permit development of at least 40 units, has the appropriate general plan designation, is appropriately zoned for development as affordable housing, and is or will be served by adequate public facilities and infrastructure. The transferred land shall have appropriate zoning and development standards to make the development of the affordable units feasible. No later than the date of approval of the final subdivision map, parcel map, or of the residential development, the transferred land shall have all of the permits and approvals, other than building permits, necessary for the development of the very low income units on the transferred land, except that the City may subject the proposed development to subsequent design review if the design is not reviewed by the local government prior to the time of transfer.

4. The transferred land and the affordable units shall be subject to a deed restriction ensuring continued affordability of the units consistent with Section

19.28.110 of this chapter if required by financing programs or subsidy programs. The deed restriction shall also prohibit short-term rentals.

5. The land is transferred to the City or to a housing developer approved by the City. The City may require the developer to identify and transfer the land to the affordable housing developer.

6. The transferred land shall be within the boundary of the proposed development or, if the City determines appropriate, within one-quarter mile of the boundary of the proposed development.

7. A proposed source of funding for the very low income units shall be identified no later than the date of approval of the final subdivision map, parcel map, or residential development application.

§ 19.28.085. Student housing.

A. Student Housing Density Bonus Requirements. In order for a student housing development to be eligible for a density bonus under Section 19.28.040 of this chapter, the student housing development must meet the following requirements:

1. All units in the student housing development shall be used exclusively for undergraduate, graduate, or professional students enrolled full time at an institution of higher education accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges or the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges. The developer shall, as a condition of receiving a certificate of occupancy, provide evidence to the City that the developer has entered into an operating agreement or master lease with one or more institutions of higher education for the institution or institutions to occupy all units of the student housing development with students from that institution or institutions.

2. The applicable 20% units shall be used for lower income students. For purposes of this clause, "lower income students" means students who have a household income and asset level that does not exceed the level for Cal Grant A or Cal Grant B award recipients as set forth in paragraph (1) of subdivision (k) of Section 69432.7 of the California Education Code.

3. The rent provided in the applicable units of the development for lower income students shall be calculated at 30% of 65% of the area median income for a single-room occupancy unit type.

4. The development shall provide priority for the applicable affordable units for lower income students experiencing homelessness.

5. For student housing developments that meet the aforementioned criteria, the density bonus shall be 35% of the student housing units.

B. Definition of Units. For purposes of calculating a density bonus granted for a student housing development, the term "unit" means one rental bed and its pro rata share of associated common area facilities.

§ 19.28.090. General guidelines.

A. Location of Bonus Units. As required by California Government Code Section 65915(i), the location of density bonus units within the qualifying housing development may be at the discretion of the developer, and need not be in the same area of the project where the units for the lower income households are located as long as the density bonus units are located within the same housing development.

B. Preliminary Review. A developer may submit to the Planning Division a preliminary proposal for the development of housing pursuant to this chapter prior to the submittal of any formal application for a density bonus. The City shall, within 90 days of receipt of a written proposal, notify the housing developer in writing of either: (1) any specific requirements or procedures under this chapter, which the proposal has not met; or (2) the proposal is sufficient for preparation of an application for density bonus.

C. Infrastructure and Supply Capacity. Criteria to be considered in analyzing the requested bonus will include the availability and capacity of infrastructure (water, sewer, road capacity, etc.) and water supply to accommodate the additional density.

§ 19.28.100. Findings for approval for density bonus and/or incentive(s).

A. Density Bonus Approval. The following finding shall be made by the Approving Authority in order to approve a density bonus request:

1. The density bonus request meets the requirements of this chapter.

B. Density Bonus Approval with Incentive(s). The following findings shall be made by the Approving Authority in order to approve a density bonus and incentive(s) request:

1. The density bonus request meets the requirements of this chapter;

2. The incentive is required in order to provide affordable housing; and

3. Approval of the incentive(s) will have no specific adverse impacts upon health, safety or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable to very low, low, and moderate income households.

C. Denial of a Request for an Incentive(s). The Approving Authority shall make the following findings prior to disallowing an incentive (in the case where an accompanying density bonus may be approved, or in the case of where an

incentive(s) is requested for senior housing or child care facility):

1. That the incentive is not necessary in order to provide for affordable housing costs as defined in Section 19.28.020 of this chapter, or for rents for the targeted units to be set as specified in Section 19.28.020 of this chapter.

2. That the incentive would result in specific adverse impacts upon health, safety or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable to very low, low, and moderate income households.

3. That the incentive would be contrary to State or Federal law.

§ 19.28.110. Affordable housing agreement required.

A. Agreement Required. In approving a density bonus, the associated permit or tentative map shall require that an affordable housing agreement, or other form of agreement as approved by the City Attorney, effectuating the terms of affordability of the development be executed prior to effectuation of the permit or recordation of the final map.

B. Continued Availability. The density bonus request shall include the procedures proposed by the developer to maintain the continued affordability of all affordable income density bonus units and shall be evidenced by an affordable housing agreement as follows:
1 . An applicant shall agree to, and the City shall ensure, continued affordability of all very low and low income units that qualified the applicant for the award of the density bonus for 55 years or a longer period of time if required by the construction or mortgage financing assistance program, mortgage insurance program, or rental subsidy program. Rents for the lower income density bonus units shall be set at an affordable rent as defined in Section 19.28.020 of this chapter. Owner-occupied units shall be available at an affordable housing cost as defined in Section 19.28.020 of this chapter.
2 . An applicant shall agree to, and the City shall ensure that, the initial occupants of the moderate income units are directly related to the receipt of the density bonus in the common interest development as defined in Section 4100 of the California Civil Code, are persons and families of moderate income, as defined in Section 19.28.020 of this chapter and that the units are offered at an affordable housing cost, as that cost is defined in Section 19.28.020 of this chapter. The City shall enforce an equity-sharing agreement unless it is in conflict with the requirements of another public funding source or law. The following apply to the equity-sharing agreement:
a. Upon resale, the seller of the unit shall retain the value of any improvements, the down payment, and the seller's proportionate share of

appreciation. The City shall recapture any initial subsidy and its proportionate share of appreciation, which shall then be used within five years for any of the purposes described in subdivision (e) of Section 33334.2 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, that promote homeownership.
b. For purposes of this subsection, the City's initial subsidy shall be equal to the fair market value of the home at the time of initial sale minus the initial sale price to the moderate-income household plus the amount of any down payment assistance or mortgage assistance. If upon resale the market value is lower than the initial market value, then the value at the time of the resale shall be used as the initial market value.
c. For purposes of this subsection, the City's proportionate share of appreciation shall be equal to the ratio of the initial subsidy to the fair market value of the home at the time of initial sale.

C. Specialty Units. In approving a density bonus for units for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans, homeless persons, and students, the associated permit or tentative map shall require that an affordable housing agreement, or other form of agreement as approved by the City Attorney, effectuating the terms of affordability of the development for 55 years be executed prior to effectuation of the permit or recordation of the final map. In addition, for units for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans and homeless persons, the units shall be provided at the same affordability level as very low income units.

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.11
File #: 0203-09
Item ID: 2026-511

Title: Monitoring and Transmitting Equipment and Parts - Sole Source Purchase Order Contact: Blaine Wiegel 916-746-1833 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a sole source purchase order including four (4) additional one-year renewals with Rust Automation and Controls Inc. for the procurement of Endress+Hauser monitoring and transmitting equipment, supporting Environmental Utility Department's Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition network and automation systems. The Environmental Utilities Department has standardized on high-performance transmitting and monitoring sensors with Endress+Hauser equipment. Rust Automation and Control Inc. is the exclusive manufacturer’s representative for the state. The estimated annual cost is $300,000, and the estimated total not-to-exceed cost, including the renewals, is $1,500,000. Funding will be provided from the Environmental Utilities Department’s annual approved budgets for the Water Operations Fund and Wastewater Operations Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Sole Source Purchase Order with Rust Automation & Controls Inc. and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute four optional one-year renewals on behalf of the City without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this vendor is not in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Environmental Utilities Department has standardized on high-performance transmitting and monitoring sensors with Endress+Hauser equipment, supporting the Environmental Utility Department's Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition network and automation systems. Rust Automation and Control Inc. is the exclusive manufacturer’s representative for the state of California. Rust Automation is an authorized sales agent working on behalf of Endress+Hauser to provide quotations, proposals, sell products and receive purchase orders in their assigned territory.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated cost is $300,000 for FY2026-27. Projected spending for the optional renewal years is as follows: $300,000 for FY2027-28; $300,000 for FY2028-29; $300,000 for FY2029-30; and $300,000 for FY2030-31. The total not-to-exceed cost including the four (4) additional one (1) year renewals is estimated at $1,500,000. Funding will be provided from the Environmental Utilities Department’s annual budgets in the Water Operations Fund and Wastewater Operations Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The

purchase order for parts and equiptment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Blaine Wiegel, Preventative Maintenance Coordinator

Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-274

2. Sole Source Form

REVIEWERS:

Blaine Wiegel, Environmental Utilities Department - Wastewater Created/Initiated - 6/16/2026 Tracie Mueller, Environmental Utilities Department - Wastewater Approved - 6/16/2026 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/16/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/19/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/29/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/1/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 7/2/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-274

APPROVING A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE ORDER FOR MONITORING AND

TRANSMITTING EQUIPMENT AND PARTS

WHEREAS, a Sole Source Purchase Order for Monitoring and Transmitting Equipment and Parts for the Environmental Utilities Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Network, by and between the City of Roseville and Rust Automation & Controls Inc, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order is approved.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

_______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

5/19/2026
5/29/2026

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.12
File #: 0203-09
Item ID: 2026-513

Title: Ultraviolet Disinfection Equipment – Sole Source Annual Purchase Order Contact: Katherine Gettings 916-746-1865 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a sole source purchase order including four (4) additional one-year renewals with Trojan Technologies Corp. for supply of repair parts and replacement components for the ultraviolet disinfection system at the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant and Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant. Trojan Technologies Corp. is the sole supplier of validated replacement parts required to maintain system performance and meet regulatory requirements. The total cost of the purchase order is not to exceed $1,000,000 per year with a total of $5,000,000 over five years. Funding will be provided from the Environmental Utilities Department’s annual approved budgets for the Wastewater Operations Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a sole source purchase order with Trojan Technologies Corp. for supply of repair parts and replacement components for the ultraviolet (UV) disinfection system at the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP) and Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP) and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals for purchase orders without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

BACKGROUND
Wastewater at the Dry Creek Watewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP) and the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP) is treated through primary, secondary, and tertiary processes and then disinfected using ultraviolet (UV) systems manufactured by Trojan Technologies Corp. The disinfected water is either reused as Title 22 recycled water or discharged to local creeks, making reliable UV system performance essential for compliance with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and recycled water permit requirements. Both treatment plants utilize Trojan 3000 systems that require routine maintenance and periodic replacement of key components such as lamps, sensors, ballasts, and wiper mechanisms, which have reached the end of their service life and are experiencing increased failures. The proposed annual purchase order will support ongoing maintenance and programmatic replacement of these components. Trojan Technologies Corp. is the sole supplier of validated replacement parts required to maintain system performance and meet regulatory requirements.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated cost is $1,000,000 for FY2026-27, $1,000,000 for FY2027-28, $1,000,000 for FY2028-29, $1,000,000 for FY2029-30, and $1,000,000 for FY2030-31. The total not-to-exceed cost for the purchase orders, including the four additional one-year renewals, is $5,000,000. Funding will be provided from the Environmental Utilities Department’s annual budgets in the Wastewater Operations Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

A purchase order for Trojan Technologies Corp. equipment does not include the potential for a significant environmental effect, and therefore is not subject to CEQA.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Katherine Gettings, EU Wastewater Maintenance Administrative Technician

Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-275

REVIEWERS:

Katherine Gettings, Environmental Utilities Department - Wastewater Created/Initiated - 6/4/2026 Tracie Mueller, Environmental Utilities Department - Wastewater Approved - 6/16/2026 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/16/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/19/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/29/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/2/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/2/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 7/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 7/6/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-275

APPROVING A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE ORDER FOR

ULTRAVIOLET DISINFECTION EQUIPMENT

WHEREAS, a Sole Source Purchase Order for Ultraviolet Disinfection Equipment, by and between Trojan Technologies Corp. and the City of Roseville, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said sole source purchase order is approved.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

_______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.13
File #: 0900-02-02-1 &
0201-01
Item ID: 2026-542

Title: Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Foul Air Collection System and Biofilter Rehabilitation Project - Design-Assist Construction Contract and Budget Adjustment Contact: Jeremy Snyder 916-746-1829 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a design-assist construction agreement with Myers & Sons Construction to provide the construction services for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Foul Air Collection System and Biofilter Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $10,101,101. Staff also recommends authorization for the City Manager or his designee to approve and pay for contract change orders for the Design-Assist and Construction Agreement that could increase the original contract amount by no more than 10% or $1,010,110. In addition, staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment to transfer $7,300,000 from the Wastewater Operations Fund to the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund to help fund the remaining work on this project, which is funded by the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund, and increase the project budget to $12,400,000. Since this is a regional wastewater project, the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund will be reimbursed for approximately 35 percent of the project’s actual cost from its partners, the South Placer Municipal Utility District and Placer County.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
• Adopt a resolution approving the Design-Assist Construction Agreement with Myers & Sons Construction, LLC for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Foul Air Collection System and Biofilter Rehabilitation Project, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
• Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price ($1,010,110).
• Adopt an ordinance approving a budget adjustment to transfer $7,300,000 from the Wastewater Operations Fund to the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund and fully-fund the remaining work on the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Foul Air Collection and Biofilter Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $7,300,000 from the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund.

BACKGROUND
The Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Foul Air Collection System and Biofilter Rehabilitation Project was initiated to replace equipment as determined by the Wastewater Treatment Plant Condition Assessment performed in 2018. The Environmental Utilities Department (EU) released Request for Proposals 08-151 for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Foul Air Collection and Biofilter Rehabilitation Project to solicit proposals for rehabilitating equipment that is at its end of life and is no longer effective in treating and exhausting the foul air coming from the bar screen room, primary clarifiers

and grit collection areas. This work will include replacement of fans, ducting, electrical equipment, and the biofilter, as well as testing, communications/networking, programming and SCADA integration and engineering. EU’s staff evaluated the qualified contractors based on the requirements in the request for proposal. Myers & Sons Construction was ranked first in overall scoring.

FISCAL IMPACT
EU’s Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Foul Air Collection System and Biofilter Rehabilitation Project requires a budget adjustment of $7,300,000 from the available resources in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund to complete the work. This brings the project’s total budget to $12,400,000 which is enough to cover the design-assist agreement with Myers & Sons Contractors contract of $10,101,101 plus change order authority of $1,010,110, $392,889 for staff secondary labor and operational technology equipment purchases, and an existing contract with the design engineering firm for $895,900.

Since this is a regional wastewater project, the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund will be reimbursed for approximately 35 percent of the project’s actual cost from its partners, the South Placer Municipal Utility District and Placer County. For this $7,300,000 budget request, EU will be reimbursed for approximately $2,555,000. This means the actual fiscal impact of this budget request to the available resources in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund will be $4,745,000 instead of $7,300,000. Overall, the City’s share of the project’s total budget will be approximately $8,060,000, which is the total requested project budget of $12,400,000 less the estimated 35% to be reimbursed from the regional partners.

In addition, EU requests a transfer from the Wastewater Operations Fund to the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund in the amount of $7,300,000. Without this transfer, the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund would drop below the reserve requirement.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves replacement or reconstruction of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as a Class 2 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Jeremy Snyder, Preventative Maintenance Supervisor

Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-276

2. Contract

3. Ordinance 7090

4. CEQA exemption Class 2

REVIEWERS:

Katherine Gettings, Environmental Utilities Department - Wastewater Created/Initiated - 6/16/2026 Tracie Mueller, Environmental Utilities Department - Wastewater Approved - 6/16/2026 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/16/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/19/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/29/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/30/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/1/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 7/1/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-276

APPROVING A DESIGN-ASSIST CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN

MYERS & SONS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Design-Assist Construction Agreement for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Foul Air Collection System and Biofilter Rehabilitation Project, by and between Myers & Sons Construction, LLC, and the City of Roseville, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO. 7090

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2026-27, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Foul Air Collection System and Biofilter Rehabilitation project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 06/03/2026

Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCAL YEAR:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6201 6801 10001 000000 7,300,000 Transfer out of Wastewater Operations Fund to Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund.
6231 6587 84001 500192 6,036,211 Increase Capital Outlay - CIP Projects budget for project #500192-DCWWTP Biofilter System Rehab
6231 5080 84001 500192 367,889 Increase Internal Project Labor budget for project #500192-DCWWTP Biofilter System Rehab
6231 5301 84001 500192 895,900 Increase Professional Services budget for project #500192-DCWWTP Biofilter System Rehab

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 14,600,000

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6231 4801 10001 000000 7,300,000 Transfer in to Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund from Wastewater Operations Fund

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL 7,300,000

NET ADJUSTMENT 7,300,000

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project DESCRIPTION
6201 3601 00000 000000 (7,300,000) Decrease Wastewater Operations Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (7,300,000)

Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Environmental Utilities department is requesting a budget adjustment of $7,300,000 to increase the DCWWTP Biofilter System Rehab project (500192) budget to fully-fund the remaining work in this project. The budget adjustment includes $7,300,000 transfer from Wastewater Operations fund (6201) to the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation fund (6231) to fund this project. Without this transfer, Wastewater Rehabilitation fund would drop below the reserve requirement. Adequate resources are available in the Wastewater Operations fund.

The current project budget is $5,100,000. With this adjustment, the revised project budget will total $12,400,000. 2026-27
Jeremy Snyder, Operational Technology and Security Admin Deanne Garcia, EU Business Analyst
EU/Wastewater

Notice of Exemption

To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678

Project Title: Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Foul Air Collection System and Biofilter Rehabilitation Project

Project Location(s): 1800 Booth Road, Roseville, CA 95747. Assessor’s Parcel Number s 474- 080-009-000, 474-110-001-000, 474-110-002-000, 473-080-000-000, and 473-080-002-000.

Project Description: The Project includes design of a new collection plumbing system, replacing exhaust and supply fans with properly sized units to meet NFPA 820 standards for air replacements in an H2S environment, and design of a replacement for the existing Biofilter media scrubber. The DCWWTP ’s current odor reduction equipment is outdated and performing inefficiently, so the project is needed to increase the effici ency and reduce odors .

The project
would not result in an expansion of use.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council

Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Environmental Utilities Department

Reason why this Project is Exempt: The project qualifies for a Class 2 Categorical Exemption as described in Section 15302 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:

“Class 2 consists of the…replacement or reconstruction of existing…facilities where the structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced, in cluding... replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems involving negligible or no expansion of capacity.”

The project consists of replacing the existing odor control s ystem at the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. The project would not result in expansion of use. Consequently , the Class 2 Categorical Exemption would apply.

Lead Agency Contact Person : Jeremy Snyder, Roseville Department of Environmental Utilities (916-746-1936).

Signature: Date: 12-19-2023
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.14
File #: 0203-09
Item ID: 2026-542

Title: Wastewater Collections Main Lining Materials - Purchase Order Contact: Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of an annual open purchase order with Vortex Services, LLC utilizing the Helping Governments Across the Country (H-GAC) contract #TP07-25, including 2 additional (1) year renewals to purchase collection system main lining materials. The estimated total cost of the purchase order for the first year is $350,000 and the total not-to-exceed cost, including the renewals, is $1,160,000.

Funding will be provided from the Environmental Utilities Department’s annual approved budget for the Sewer Collection System Cured-in-Place-Pipe Rehabilitation Project in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve an annual open purchase order to Vortex Services, LLC to purchase main line lining material utilizing H-GAC contract #TP07-25 for the wastewater collection system and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

Additionally, staff requests authority for the City Manager or designee to execute two (2) additional one (1) year purchase order renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Wastewater Division employs a sewer collection system main lining process performed by City staff.

This main lining process prevents sewer infiltration and protects the environment and City customers from sewer backups and spills.

Wastewater Collections recently procured the equipment that assists both their routine and emergency repairs and rehabilitation to the existing collection system infrastructure. Wastewater Collections has used cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) rehabilitation using ultraviolet light for the last five years through the procurement of two contractors through three separate construction contracts. The EU Department received a single bid for two of the construction contract procurements, and two bids for the other construction contract procurement. The last two construction contracts required work to be removed via change order from each of the two contractors due to their inability to perform the required CIPP work.

The Wastewater Collection Section continually inspects sewer mains using closed circuit television that identifies pipes for CIPP repair and rehabilitation. The Wastewater Collections Section has been CIPP rehabilitating laterals for many years. Based on the continual need for CIPP rehabilitation of sewer mains, the Wastewater Collection team's experience with CIPP lining laterals and the lack of competent CIPP

contractors in the local community, the EU Department has decided that expanding the Wastewater Collection team's CIPP lining work to include 8-inch to 24-inch sewer mains is in the best interest of the City.

The previously purchased CIPP equipment allows Wastewater Collection staff to rehabilitate existing wastewater collections mains to prevent permit violations, and to decrease inflow and infiltration, which will reduce wastewater collections and treatment plant capital costs. Staff estimates the payback period for this CIPP equipment purchase will be less than two years based on the three prior construction contract costs, and an estimate that the Wastewater Collections crew will line 2,400 lineal feet of pipe a month over a six- month period per year.

H-GAC is a nationwide, government procurement service that offers competitively solicited purchasing contracts for products and equipment to all government, education, and non-profit agencies across the United States. The City will use the H-GAC contract #TP07-25 to purchase main lining material including UV liner, glide foil, restraint sleeves and storage crates. H-GAC contract #TP07-25 expires June 30, 2029.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated annual cost of material is $350,000 for FY2026-27; $385,000 for FY2027-28; and $425,000 for FY2028-29 with a not-to-exceed amount of $1,160,000. Funding will be provided from the Environmental Utilities Department’s annual approved budget for the Sewer Collection System Cured-in- Place-Pipe Rehabilitation Project in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Tracie Mueller, Wastewater Utility Manager

Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-277

2. CEQA Notice of Exemption

REVIEWERS:

Loni Randolph, Environmental Utilities Department - Wastewater Created/Initiated - 6/10/2026 Tracie Mueller, Environmental Utilities Department - Wastewater Approved - 6/12/2026

Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/16/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/19/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/29/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/2/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/2/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 7/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 7/6/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-277

APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER FOR WASTEWATER

COLLECTIONS MAIN LINING MATERIALS

WHEREAS, a Purchase Order for Wastewater Collections Main Lining Materials, by and between Vortex Services, LLC and the City of Roseville, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order is approved.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute two (2) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

_______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

Notice of Exemption

To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678

Project Title: W astewater Collections Main Lining Materials - Purchase Order

Project Location(s): Various, citywide at City-owned and operated facilities.

Project Description :

The Environmental Utilities (EU) Department recommends that the City Council approve an annual open purchase order for the purchase of main lining materials for the ongoing repair and maintenance of the existing wastewater collection system. Installation of the materials would be completed by Wastewater Division employees using the cured- in-place pipe (CIPP) technology. Materials would be ordered and installed as needed for existing pipelines.

None of the improvements would result in increases in capacity and/or expansion of use.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council

Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Environmental Utilities Department

Reason why this Project is Exempt: The project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption as described in Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:

“Class 1 (Existing Facilities) consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, …or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use.

The project consists of the purchase of main lining materials used for ongoing operation, maintenance, and repairs of the City’s wastewater collection system. There would be no increase in capacity or expansion of use. Consequently, the Class 1 Categorical Exemption applies.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Loni Randolph, Roseville Department of Environmental Utilities (916) 746-1898.

Signature: Date: 5/21/2026
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.15
File #: 0900-02
Item ID: 2026-547

Title: Sewer Lift Station 19 Force Main Condition Assessment - Professional Services Agreement
Contact: Kyle Drury [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval and award of a professional services agreement to SFE Global in the amount of $151,750 for a comprehensive inline condition assessment of the Sewer Lift Station 19 force main. This work is part of an Enhanced Compliance Action Project, in agreement with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Funding for this agreement is provided by the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the professional services agreement with SFE Global and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
In April 2025, the City completed a Force Mains Condition Assessment Plan. This Plan identified inspection technologies, prioritized inspection based on risk, and offered estimated costs for inspection.

Derived from this plan, the force main serving Lift Station 19 has been flagged as the City's highest priority pipeline for a condition assessment. The factors that contribute to this priority status include its length (approximately 2,773 linear feet), diameter (8-inches), and age (installed 1986). The recommended approach to complete this assessment is for the City to self-install a pig launcher at the lift station. This installation will allow an inspection services vendor to implement a nondestructive, in-line condition assessment of the force main.

On February 4, 2026, the Regional Water Board signed into effect a settlement agreement with the City, by issue of a stipulated order that this Enhanced Compliance Action (ECA) Project be completed within 16 months of the effective date.

On March 30, 2026, the City published a Request for Proposals (RFP #08-101) for condition assessment services for the Sewer Lift Station 19 Force Main Condition Assessment.

On April 28, 2026, three (3) companies submitted proposals to the City Clerk’s office for review and consideration. Based upon evaluation of the proposals, a panel of Environmental Utilities Department staff determined the highest-ranking proposer to be SFE Global.

FISCAL IMPACT
The costs for this scope of the project include the professional services agreement with SFE Global for $151,750 and an additional $72,400 for secondary labor costs for City staff working on this project. As detailed in the stipulated order, a suspended liability, i.e., a minimum required amount, of $178,933 must

be spent on the project. The project has an adequate budget to pay for this scope of work, provided by the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Kyle Drury, Senior Engineer

Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-278

2. Professional Services Agreement

REVIEWERS:

Kyle Drury, Environmental Utilities Department - Wastewater Created/Initiated - 6/15/2026 Tracie Mueller, Environmental Utilities Department - Wastewater Approved - 6/16/2026 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/16/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/19/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/29/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/2/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/2/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 7/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 7/6/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-278

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SFE GOLBAL, INC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Professional Services Agreement for the Sewer Lift Station 19 Force Main Condition Assessment, by and between the City of Roseville and SFE Global, Inc, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Professional Services Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

/CFO

Devin Whittington on behalf of Sean Bigley
/ CEO

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.16
File #: 0800-02
Item ID: 2026-544

Title: Waste Services Cost-of-Services Rate Study – Professional Services Agreement Contact: Joseph Barrow 916-746-1732 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement with HF&H Consultants, LLC. in the amount of $123,977 to conduct a cost-of-service rate study for Waste Services. Additionally, authorize the City Manager or designee, to approve change order requests up to ten percent (10%) of the contract amount or $12,398. The contingency is recommended to address complexities that may arise during the cost-of-service rate study process. Funding for this agreement is included in the Environmental Utilities Department’s FY2026-27 annual budget in the Waste Services Operations fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Professional Services Agreement with HF&H Consultants, LLC for a cost-of-service rate study for Waste Services, and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

Staff also recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager or designee to approve change orders, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

BACKGROUND
The Environmental Utilities Department (EU) is coordinating the development of a Waste Services cost-of- service rate study for fiscal years (FY) 2027-28 and 2028-29. The scope of the cost-of-service rate study includes a 10-year financial model, comprehensive financial planning and rate models, review and potential update of existing EU fiscal policies, and documentation of the analyses. Prior EU rate studies have required additional consultant time to address unforeseen scenarios.

EU published a Request for Proposals (RFP #08-179) on February 25, 2026, for a Waste Services Utility Cost-of-Service Study. On April 7, 2026, the City Clerk’s office received proposals from (4) firms for review and consideration. Based on evaluation criteria established in the RFP, staff determined the highest- ranking firm to be HF&H.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of the professional services agreement is $123,977. Authorized change orders on an as-needed basis up to 10% ($12,398) as contingency, would bring the total contract amount to $136,375. Funding is included in the FY2026-27 Waste Services Operations Fund budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no

possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Joseph Barrow, Environmental Utilities Business Analyst

Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-256

2. Professional Services Agreement

REVIEWERS:

Joseph Barrow, Environmental Utilities Department Created/Initiated - 6/11/2026 Brian Craighead, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/11/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 6/19/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/24/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/24/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/24/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/25/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/1/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 7/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 7/1/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-256

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND HF&H CONSULTANTS, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Professional Services Agreement for the Waste Services Cost-of-Services Rate Study, by and between the City of Roseville and HF&H Consultants, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Professional Services Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 20 , by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and HF&H Consultants, LLC, a California limited liability company (“CONSULTANT”); and

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY desires professional services consisting of preparing Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study; and

WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has prepared a proposal dated April 29, 2026, which describes the scope of work to be performed by CONSULTANT, the budget for the work, and the schedule for performance of the work; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified and experienced to provide such professional services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of

services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

2. Compensation. For its services provided hereunder, CONSULTANT shall be

compensated on a time and expense basis in accordance with the budget estimate as described in Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

2 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

EXHIBIT “B,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Total compensation shall not exceed one hundred, twenty-three thousand, nine hundred seventy-seven dollars($123,977).

CONSULTANT shall submit one monthly invoice for its services. Such invoices shall be delineated by task, the person performing the services, and the hourly rate, which shall be stated in time increments of not greater than one tenth (1/10) hours. CITY shall pay invoices within thirty (30) days after receipt, if the services specified in the invoice have been satisfactorily completed.

3. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT shall

defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of CONSULTANT's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.

CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONSULTANT’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

3 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

4. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and

effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY

Workers’ Compensation Statutory

Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate

Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit

Professional Liability (errors and $1,000,000 per claim omissions) $2,000,000 aggregate

a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such

coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate

endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

4 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days

written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this

Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all

subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Furthermore, CONSULTANT shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under this Agreement. Additionally, CONSULTANT shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of CITY’s indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.

Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

5 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

f. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (“SIR”) must be

disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive

subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth

herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

5. Records. CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and

records relating to the services performed hereunder during the term of this Agreement and for a period of not less than one (1) year after the date of termination or expiration. Provided, however, that in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records until such litigation, appeals or claims are resolved. Duly authorized representatives of CITY shall Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

6 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

have right of access during normal business hours and after reasonable notice to CONSULTANT’s and subcontractors’ files and records relating to the services performed hereunder and may review and copy the files and records at appropriate stages during performance of the services and during the one (1) year period following termination or expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provision in its contracts with all subcontractors.

6. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

7. Prevailing Wages. When applicable, for purposes of this Agreement,

CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall comply with all applicable prevailing wage laws, e.g., but not limited to, California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq. In accordance with said Section 1775, CONSULTANT shall forfeit as a penalty to the City two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates for such work or craft in which such worker is employed for any work done on-site under the Agreement by CONSULTANT or by any subcontractor in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code and in particular, Labor Code Sections 1770 to 1780, inclusive. In addition to said penalty and pursuant to said Section 1775, the difference between such stipulated prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof for which each worker was paid less than the stipulated prevailing wage shall be paid to each worker by CONSULTANT or the applicable subcontractor.

Pursuant to the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1773, the contracting department has identified the source, stated below, of the general prevailing rate of wages applicable to the site to be done, for straight time, overtime, and holiday work. The holiday wage rate listed shall be applicable to all holidays recognized in the collective bargaining Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

7 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

agreement of the particular craft, classification or type of worker concerned. These wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, general prevailing wage rates set forth above, which forms a part of this Agreement, shall be posted by CONSULTANT at a prominent place at the work site. Prevailing wage rates to be posted at the work site will be furnished by the contracting department. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by CONSULTANT in determining its proposal and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY or the Agreement.

8. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and

local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.

9. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time,

ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement.

10. Public Contracts: Conflicts of Interest. CONSULTANT’s duties and services

under this Agreement shall not include preparing or assisting CITY with any portion of the CITY’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with CITY. CITY shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. CONSULTANT’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications.

CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

8 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

11. Governing Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and

its EXHIBITS, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern. In the event of any conflict between any of the EXHIBITS, the provisions of the first in order of attachment shall govern.

12. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

13. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT, inclusive of its agents, officers,

employees, volunteers, independent contractors, and subcontractors, shall act as an independent contractor, and covenants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status, that it will neither hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of CITY by reason of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

9 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s on- call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

14. Representations and Warranties. CONSULTANT warrants that it has not

employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY shall have the right to terminate as void this Agreement, without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.

15. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs,

successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

16. Copyright, Ownership and Use of Materials. All tangible material (“Material”)

created or delivered pursuant to this Agreement is considered a work made for hire under the Copyright Act. To the extent such Material does not qualify as a work made for hire, CONSULTANT hereby assigns to CITY all right, title, and interest, including but not limited to all copyrights, in all Material created by CONSULTANT in its performance under this Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings (including computer aided drawings), papers, documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

10 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

and shall remain, the property of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

In the event that CONSULTANT uses, employs, designates, or retains any person or entity who is not an employee of CONSULTANT, to perform any work required of it pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall require said person or entity to execute an agreement containing the preceding paragraph.

17. Termination of Agreement. The City may terminate this Agreement without

cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CITY thirty (30) days advance written notice. In the event of termination through no fault of CONSULTANT, CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for services performed as of the date of termination, upon the release to CITY of all Material hereunder, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. CITY retains the right to receive and use any Material, notwithstanding any termination or any dispute regarding the amount to be paid.

18. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal

action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

19. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be

waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

20. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any

Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

11 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

21. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT
Env
ironmental Utilities Department HF & H Consultants, LLC Attn: Sean Bigley Attn: Rick Simonson
2005 Hilltop Circle 590 Ygnacio Valley Rd., Suite 105
Roseville, CA 95747 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

22. Int
egrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. , adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the day of , 20 , and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a HF & H CONSULTANTS, LLC, a California municipal corporation limited liability company
BY: BY:

DOMINICK CASEY
its:

City Manager
[SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
ROBERT C. HILTON
President / Chief Executive Office
Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

12 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: ________________________________ BY:
_______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPR
OVED AS TO FORM:

BY:
_______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPR
OVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY:
________________________________

SEAN BIGLEY
Env
ironmental Utilities Director

RICHARD SIMONSON
Senior Vice President / Chief Financial Officer
Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

13 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

EXHIBIT “A”

Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB E. Project Plan

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 16 of 30
TAB E. Project Plan

OVERVIEW AND APPROACH
The City is seeking a comprehensive, Proposition 218 –compliant cost‑of‑service study for its utilities that supports long‑term financial sustainability, stable incremental rate adjustments, and transparent communication with stakeholders. Our project plan is designed to meet those objectives by delivering:
• Defensible, cost‑based rate structures aligned with cost causation. • A City‑owned, dynamic Excel financial and rate model capable of scenario testing. • Clear documentation and communication tools to support staff, Council, and ratepayers.
• A practical implementation pathway consistent with the City’s biennial rate‑setting practices and reserve policies.

Task 1. Project Initiation
The purpose of this task is to lay the foundation for the study. This task’s immediate objective is to gain an understanding of how the City’s solid waste utility operates with regard to finances, staffing, billing, and relationships with other agencies or contractors. We are already working collaboratively with your team too, which has given us a detailed, current understanding of the City’s assumptions, data sources, and decision points. While this task is designed to gather a full understanding of your e xpectations, your HF&H team is already ahead of the curve with understanding your existing solid waste system and anticipated changes to that system.

We plan to facilitate a kick -off meeting with key City staff. The meeting will introduce the individual participants at the City and HF&H and identify their project roles and expectations.

Meeting topics will include discussions evaluating relevant fiscal policies and community interests, identifying current issues and concerns (financial and operational), discussing project scope, timing, and deliverables, and requesting and compiling all relevant and required data. HF&H will provide a data request list ahead of this meeting for the purpose of discussion during the kick-off meeting. At this meeting we would like to explore whether the City would prefer leveraging and enhancing the existing cost -of-service model or have HF&H develop a new cost -of-service model framework that provides greater scenario -testing flexibility to address the more complex conditions underlying this study.

Deliverables:

• HF&H will provide the City with an RFI regarding data needs for performing the development of the financial and cost-of-service model and document the intended outcomes of the cost-of-service study (rate classes, proposed scenarios, etc.). • HF&H assumes that this task will require up to two in -person or virtual meetings with City staff, legal counsel, and other internal stakeholders to gather data, agree on modeling assumptions, cooperate on the design and functionality of the model, evaluate and agree on Proposition 218 considerations, and model dynamic changes to assumptions and scenarios.

Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB E. Project Plan

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 17 of 30
Key Understandings and Assumptions:

HF&H assumes that the City will be able to meet either virtually or in person and that all stakeholders necessary to this engagement can be available for at least one of the kick -off meetings (if two are needed).

Assigned Staff:
• Project Director: Executive oversight and project alignment. • Project Manager: Facilitation, coordination, and schedule management. • Project Advisor: Data and insight for broader City alignment. • Lead Analyst: Data scoping and information request development. • Support Analyst: Data organization and tracking.

Task 2. Conduct a Comprehensive Cost-of-Service Study
In order to establish defensible rates, the City must first determine the total, fully burdened cost of providing all of the services. Furthermore, in California, Proposition 218 and years of judicial interpretation of that law provides detailed and explic it legal direction for what costs are eligible, how direct and indirect costs are considered, and how to apportion those costs to various fees or charges. This cost-of-service study task will form the foundational basis for the later tasks in this project. The cost-of-service study will provide a framework for evaluating program changes like bulky item collection and residential recycling “3 can” collection with different container options, impacts from regulatory requirements, and other stakeholder identified program options. Additionally, this model will capture long-term rehabilitation and capital replacement costs, as well as changes to financial reserve policies. Finally, the cost - of-service study will be the legal justification for the Proposition 218 noticing. All of this points to the need for a robust and comprehensive but transparent and easy-to-understand cost-of- service model.

HF&H commits to developing a model that can be handed over to the City to be maintained after this project is over. This is critical as Environmental Utilities (EU) will need to monitor assumptions compared to actuals and possibly make corrections over tim e if actuals vary significantly from those assumptions, particularly if operational changes to service are made such as adding a bulky program or the adoption of different bundled service offerings with different container size options as the projected cos ts and revenues will likely vary from actuals due to the uncertainty of participation levels.

Task 2 is split into six components, including an optional task below:

Task 2a: Current Operations
HF&H will review, identify, and summarize the City’s Solid Waste Enterprise Fund financial and operational data to evaluate current:
• Revenue Sources.
• Reserve fund policies and requirements.
• Operating expenses.

Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB E. Project Plan

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 18 of 30
• Allocations between activities.
• Allocations of overhead costs.
• Capital Improvement Plan projections and funding.
• Fleet plan.
• Customer count and projected growth.

This task will serve as the “base” scenario by which other alternative operations and future considerations are compared. In communications with the public this “base” will be instrumental in order to communicate what the drivers of costs are through the 1 0-year planning period and 218 noticing period. Effectively communicating the cost impacts of simply maintaining the status quo lays the foundation of comprehension and understanding around new program options and the need for incremental rate increases to realize the revenue required for implementation of new programs.

Task 2b: Future Considerations
This project provides an opportunity to evaluate the level of service provided and to present options for a range of outcomes from maintaining the status quo and minimizing rate impact to significantly enhancing the level of service provided to the public with things like bulky item collection, a 3 can system, or any of a number of other program ideas that may arise from the stakeholder engagement that is conducted as part of this project.

HF&H will work with the City to understand and model the costs associated with up to five different service enhancements or modifications compared to the current system. HF&H will review the cost modeling and assumptions with EU staff to ensure that all assumptions made, and the resulting cost-of-service is reasonable and aligns with expected operations. HF&H will revise that modeling up to two times per enhancement or modification during the course of the project.

HF&H will build a feature into the cost modeling developed in Task 2c to allow adjustments to be entered and adjusted in the model at any time. This same feature will allow the City to assess incremental changes to various operations at any time after this study is complete.

Task 2c: Develop Rate and Financial Planning Model
HF&H will develop and provide a stand-alone Excel-based financial simulation and projection model that EU staff can use to determine the effect of various financial decisions on future rates that is simple to use yet provides functionality to incorporate current and future needs.

The model will include the ability to develop cost -of-service data, evaluate changes in operations, programs, and services that impact cost of service, analyze alternative revenue options, and provide rate and financial projections under a variety of scenarios. In order to meet those requirements, the initial design and framework of the model will need to be developed prior to beginning those tasks. During the completion of those tasks the model will modified as needed to meet the needs of the City.

HF&H will develop the initial framework of a ten-year user-friendly model for the City’s use to project future rates and provide long-term financial modeling. The model will consist of three interactive modules:

Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB E. Project Plan

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 19 of 30
• A Cost-of-Service module that will allow HF&H and the City to determine the initial cost of service (task 2a) and model incremental changes to that cost of service based on the future considerations in task 2b, in addition, the City will be able to maintain this module with each new annual budget and budget amendment once the project is complete. The mod ule will also provide the City with the ability to determine cost of service using actual expenses at the end of each fiscal year. This will enable active management of this system, which HF&H finds critically important when new service offerings established.
• A Rate Projection module that will provide the ability to calculate and project rates based on budgetary and projected operating and capital expenses. The rate projection model will be built to enable up to five scenarios including scenarios that may underfund the cost of service and phase in charges to achieve cost of service over time while drawing down reserves.
• A Financial Planning module that will provide long term planning projections (ten years) based on annual financial data and economic projections provided by the City. We generally find that it is best to use the same long -term economic assumptions as are u sed in projections for other City financial matters such as property tax and sales tax planning.

During the development of the initial framework for each module, we will work with EU staff to ensure that the module will be consistent with the needs of the City and that the model will be user-friendly for the City once it is delivered at the end of this project.

Each module will incorporate the ability to develop alternative “what if” scenarios to account for changes in a variety of factors including:
• The impact of projected growth and inflation on operational and financial assumptions.
• The impact of new programs and services on operational and financial assumptions. • The impact of changes in current levels of service.
• The allocation of existing revenues, operating expenses, and capital expenses to the collection system.
• The impact of changes in equipment purchase scheduling. • The impact of changes in capital project scheduling.
• The impact of variations in debt financing decisions. • The use of alternative funding sources, if desired.
• The maintenance of necessary operating reserves.

As we develop the model, we will work closely with EU staff responsible for budget and financial issues to ensure that the development of the tool is logical and easy to follow. At the end of the project, we will provide model documentation and facilitate up to t hree training sessions with EU staff to familiarize them with the abilities of the model and the relationships between each module with a goal of EU being able to maintain the tool independently after the project.

Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB E. Project Plan

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 20 of 30
Task 2d: Cost-of-Service Study
This task will provide the City with the overall cost of service along with the unit cost. The financial information derived from this task will feed into the Financial Model developed in Task 2c.

We will utilize the Cost -of-Service module of the model to develop Enterprise fund financial cost allocations as follows:

Service Types. All costs will be allocated to one or more of the following Service Types:
• Regular curbside solid waste collection.
• Regular curbside recycling collection (as a scenario). • Regular curbside organics collection.

Cost Allocation Categories. Costs will then be allocated, as appropriate, between the following five cost allocation categories in order to determine costs that are the same for all Service Levels and costs that vary based on the service demands of each Service Level:
• Fixed costs – those costs that basically remain constant regardless of the service activity associated with the Service Level (e.g. legal service charges, space rental charges, communications charges, training charges, cleaning supplies charges, freight ch arges, computer software charges, cost allocation plan charges and insurance charges).
• Variable costs – those costs that fluctuate directly in relation to the service activity required for the Service Level (e.g. payroll and payroll related charges, workers compensation charges, fleet service charges and collection vehicle fuel charges). • Disposal or Processing costs – the specific cost of disposing or processing materials, which vary based on Material Type and Service Level.
• Container costs (collection operations only) – the cost of specific containers utilized for each collection Service Level.
• Capital and Debt Service costs – those costs associated with equipment depreciation and debt service.

Enhanced or Modified Services. A module will be developed to incorporate analysis of the future considerations from Task 2b into the model. This will include dynamic features allowing the City to toggle these changes in the scenario modeling to see the impact of each one individually or in combination.

Service Levels. Costs in each of the Cost Allocation Categories will then be allocated among each of the selected Service Levels based on factors such as on customers, containers, or capacity. Not all service types will require an allocation of cost by Service Level an d that determination will be made in cooperation with the City and legal counsel.

Task 2e: Calculation and Projection of Per-Unit Costs and Rates Based on the work performed in Tasks 2a through 2d, HF&H will build a component of the module to calculate the per-unit cost of service associated with the current conditions as well as each scenario considered in the model. This will include rate projections for a period of ten Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB E. Project Plan

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 21 of 30
years. This module will also be used to evaluate alternative fee schedules in preparation of Task 5.

Deliverables:

• HF&H will provide the City with a working, Excel -based, cost-of-service and rate projection model including all features and scenarios described in this task. • HF&H assumes that task 2 will require up to twelve (12) in person or virtual meetings with City staff, legal counsel, and other internal stakeholders to gather data, agree on modeling assumptions, cooperate on the design and functionality of the model, eva luate and agree on Proposition 218 considerations, and model dynamic changes to assumptions and scenarios.

Key Understandings and Assumptions:

HF&H assumes that the City will provide timely responses to all requests for information and clarification and will be available for the meetings required to solicit their feedback and direction on various maters throughout this modeling exercise.

HF&H further assumes that the City’s data related to subscribers is at least 95% accurate. We are not anticipating the need for field verification of data or other primary data validation.

Should additional data validation be required related to this subsc riber data, we will discuss approaches with the City.

Assigned Staff:
• Project Director: Model review and quality control.
• Project Manager: Financial model ownership. Coordination and staff review meetings.
• Project Advisor: Model review and regulatory input.
• Lead Analyst: Primary model development and analysis. • Support Analyst: Modeling support and Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA and QC) support.

Task 3. Rate Comparison
A basic characteristic of the human experience is that we constantly compare our position to those of others around us. This is especially true as we encounter change. The potential implementation of new programs likely ends with ratepayers paying more than they are today.

As a result, there will be a continuous need to relay to the public, stakeholders, and elected officials where the City stands in comparison to other communities when it comes to the value of the rates paid for the services provided.

HF&H will conduct a survey of up to 15 communities throughout California that are similar and geographically proximate to the City to develop a detailed profile of each community’s solid waste system. HF&H actively maintains a Knowledge Integration database with many agencies and already has much of the required data, not to mention current warm contacts for obtaining any additional or more current data needed at the time of the survey. HF&H will Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB E. Project Plan

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 22 of 30
recommend a list of 18-20 comparable agencies from around the state, from which the City should select up to 15. The recommendations will focus on agencies that have similar populations to the City, municipal collection and billing, and similar programming and service levels to the proposed programs the City would like to implement.

HF&H will gather all available data from each target jurisdiction. In the event that we are unable to successfully contact or gather information from a target after several attempts, we will give the City the option of attempting to stimulate contact with that agency or using another one of the recommended jurisdictions from the initial pool that was considered.

Deliverables:

• HF&H will provide the City with a survey report supplying information on each of the communities surveyed and offering comparisons among those agencies and, if desired, to current data on the City’s system.
• HF&H will provide the City with a PowerPoint presentation at the survey review meeting to present the preliminary results of the work. HF&H anticipates that the City will review and provide one set of consolidated, non-conflicting comments on the presentation. HF&H will finalize the presentation based on the agreed -upon changes. This survey will be incorporated into the presentation to at public workshops and City Council hearings where the proposed rates developed in Task 2 are considered for adoption.

Key Understandings and Assumptions:

The survey list will include up to 15 agencies. HF&H will provide one draft of each work product which will each be revised once based on a consolidated set of non-conflicting comments from the City.

Assigned Staff:
• Project Director: Survey review and quality control.
• Project Manager: Survey ownership. Oversight and review of survey. • Lead Analyst: Survey and report development.
• Support Analyst: Data gathering and survey development.

Task 4. Prepare a Cost-of-Service Study Report
In order to communicate the various alternative rate scenarios to the public, stakeholders, and elected decisionmakers it is critical to produce a clear, comprehensive, and accessible report and supporting presentation materials. As a threshold matter, the report will adequately document the cost of service as required for Proposition 218 compliance. This report must do more than just comply with the law. This report must communicate clearly to the public on a sensitive issue that impacts the budgets of every solid waste customer in the City. The report needs to clearly describe all of the elements of the cost of service, the relationship between the level of service provided to the community and the costs, the options for conveying those costs to the public in the form of programmatic changes and the impacts those have on rate structures, and ultimately provide recommendations for rate structures and adjustments (to be evaluated in Task 2), and any other areas of implementation consideration identified throughout the conduct of this project.

Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB E. Project Plan

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 23 of 30
HF&H will prepare a report and presentation materials for the City based on the cost-of-service analysis (Task 2), and the research of other solid waste systems (Task 3). As described in the “deliverables” subsection below, HF&H anticipates that this report may be revised up to three times (a preliminary draft, one draft report and one final report) to reflect iterative input that we receive from various levels of staff, public stakeholders, and elected officials.

HF&H will first produce the report in a PowerPoint presentation format to provide a high-level version of the report content before all of the details are drafted. This presentation format will include most of the content outline described below for the fuller report but will focus on the executive summary and will highlight the key findings a nd recommendations for discussion.

This PowerPoint presentation will evolve through the project with the first version being used for briefing and discussing issues with staff and later versions being used with stakeholders, public workshops, and ultimately City Council meetings. HF&H anticipates that up to three different versions of this presentation may be adapted for various audiences, but that the core content will remain the same.

From these discussions which allow City staff to review and confirm direction prior to full report development HF&H will gather the framework for our written report . Following staff input, we will prepare a Draft Final Report that fully documents the study, cost analysis, revenue analysis, cost allocation methodology, regulatory and policy considerations, risk and sensitivity analysis, and ultimately recommendations of rates to be adopted . After incorporating City comments, we will deliver a Final Report suitable for public release and Council consideration.

Deliverables:
• As described in the scope of work, HF&H anticipates providing up to three different versions of the PowerPoint presentation, assuming that the core content is the same and that we are removing or editing content based on the audience and changes that have occurred in the analysis.
• As described in the scope of work, HF&H anticipates providing up to two draft and one final version of the comprehensive report document. The iterative drafts are intended to reflect any changes in direction as the report is reviewed through senior management, legal, stakeholders, and committee or council.

Key Understandings and Assumptions:

HF&H anticipates that the City will provide consolidated and non -conflicting comments from all reviewers for each iteration of the draft report or PowerPoint presentation. HF&H will count each set of comments as one round of review and changes.

Assigned Staff:
• Project Director: Executive review, messaging oversight, Council‑level support. • Project Manager: Report coordination, City review process management. • Project Advisor: Report guidance and review.
• Lead Analyst: Technical writing, exhibits, and tables. • Support Analyst: Report writing and QA and QC.

Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB E. Project Plan

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 24 of 30
• Administrative: Graphics, formatting, and document assembly.

Task 5. Assist City with Proposition 218 Notice
The purpose of this task is to conclude the project with successful implementation of the preferred schedule of recommended rates. City Council and public input is key to a successful rate setting study. A clear, well thought out Proposition 218 notice wil l provide additional clarity to the Council and ratepayers so that all stakeholders understand the proposed rates and the financial implications to each customer. Given this notice will establish collection rates, it is imperative customers understand the rates required to continue their chosen level of service, as it is imperative that all legal requirements of the notice are present.

Upon completion of Task 2 and in tandem with Task 4, HF&H will assist the City in developing a Proposition 218 notice. The City will need to prepare a five -year Proposition 218 notice, to be mailed following Council’s approval of the fee schedule for rates to be effective July 1, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, and 2031. HF&H will assist the City in drafting the Proposition 218 notice and fee schedule with input from the City’s legal team to ensure all legal requirements are met. Any rate information or calculation s needed to support the notice will be provided by HF&H. However, our scope does not include printing or mailing of the Proposition 218 notices, nor does it include receiving, verifying, or tallying protests submitted by the City’s ratepayers. It is recommended the City work with a mailing house with a proven track record of administering Proposition 218 notices. It is recommended the City utilize a third -party or experienced City staff to manage the receipt, verification, and tallying of any protests received to ensure accurate reporting during the Public Hearing.

Deliverables:

• HF&H will provide up to three reviews of the draft Proposition 218 notice prepared by the City, with redlined, tracked changes to the draft Proposition 218 notice.

Key Understandings and Assumptions:

HF&H assumes the City will be the responsible party for drafting, mailing, and managing the Proposition 218 notice. Our team recommends and assumes the City will have its legal team review all deliverables with this task, including the ordinance, notice, and any municipal code revisions. The City’s choice to adopt rates via resolution in place of an ordinance will not qualify as Unanticipated Services. HF&H has assumed attendance of all meetings will be in - person.

Assigned Staff:
• Project Director: Executive review, messaging oversight, Council‑level support. • Project Manager: Notice coordination, City review process management. • Project Advisor: Notice guidance and review.
• Lead Analyst: Technical writing, exhibits, and tables. • Support Analyst: Notice editing and review.
• Administrative: Document review and QC.

Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB E. Project Plan

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 25 of 30
Task 6. Project Management and Quality Control
This task provides ongoing project management and quality control to ensure the studies are completed on schedule, within scope, and to a high professional standard. We will manage the project timeline, coordinate task sequencing, track deliverables, and ensure that City staff have regular visibility into progress and upcoming milestones.

Quality control will be integrated throughout the project and will include internal peer review of financial models, cost ‑of‑service calculations, rate tables, and report narratives. We will perform reconciliation checks to City source data, consistency checks between model outputs and written materials, and reviews focused on clarity, accuracy, and defensibility. This structured QC approach reduces adoption risk and ensures that all deliverables are internally consistent and technically sound.

Assigned Staff:
• Project Director: Oversight of QC standards and milestone reviews. • Project Manager: Day‑to‑day management, schedule and deliverable tracking. • All Staff: Participation in quality assurance reviews.

Task 7. Progress Meetings
We will hold regular bi -weekly progress meetings throughout the project to review status, confirm assumptions, resolve data questions, and ensure alignment with City priorities. These meetings will be used to preview interim results, discuss policy conside rations, and identify any emerging issues early, supporting an efficient and collaborative study process.

Assigned Staff:
• Project Director: Participation at key milestone progress meetings, as appropriate. • Project Manager: Primary facilitator and point of contact. • Lead Analyst: Technical updates and discussion support.

Task 8. Attendance and Support for Public Workshops, Public Hearings, and City Council Meetings
At the City’s option, HF&H will attend and provide technical support at public workshops, public hearings, and City Council meetings related to review and adoption of the solid waste rate study. Support may include preparation and presentation of meeting materials, explanation of cost-of-service methods, financial planning assumptions, rate design decisions, customer bill impacts, and assistance to City staff in responding to technica l questions from elected officials and the public. This task is assumed to consist of in person meetings but could be revised to reflect pricing reflective of virtual attendance at a savings in cost from reduced travel time. At this time, the number and nature of public meetings have not been determined. Our fee estimate includes $11,695 (37 hours) of consulting time to assist with public meetings. If anticipated or actual hours exceed 37, the parties will negotiate and execute a written amendment to increase the budget and/or hours before additional work Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

14 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\HF&H Consultants PSA - Waste Services Cost-of-

EXHIBIT “B”
Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

Proposal for Waste Services Cost-of-Service Study
TAB F. Cost Proposal

City of Roseville | April 29, 2026 | Page 27 of 30
TAB F. Cost Proposal
Our fee is structured by task, based on estimated labor hours by staff classification and fully burdened billing rates. The proposed budget allocates resources the tasks described in Tab E. This structure provides the City with where costs and efforts are distributed.

The City will be billed on a time -and-expenses, not-to-exceed basis. The City will be billed only for actual hours spent on the project.

No out-of-scope work will be undertaken without prior written approval from the City. Out-of- scope work is either work on additional new tasks or extra work requested (i.e., hours in excess of the estimated hours that are not due to inefficiencies on our part) on existing tasks.

The hourly rates listed in the attached table shall be used for the City-approved extra work.

PROPOSED FEES
Ther following proposal represents the proposed level of effort and costs associated with performing the cost-of-service study on a detailed “per container, by service level” basis. This intends to capture the individual cost for each service type by container size and material.

Figure 5. Proposed Fees

Project Team
Rick
Simonson
Dave
Hilton
Rob
Hilton
Gabe
Sasser
Danielle
Derby
Vanessa
West Admin
Total
Hours
Proposed
Cost
$370 $340 $370 $299 $280 $205 $165
Task 1 Project Initiation 6 10 4 4 5 4 0 33 $10,516
Task 2 Conduct Cost-of-Service Study 16 32 6 2 48 72 0 176 $47,818 Task 3 Rate Comparison 2 5 0 0 4 36 4 51 $11,600
Task 4 Cost-of-Service Study Reports 5 10 2 2 16 22 4 61 $16,238 Task 5 218 Notice Assistance 2 4 2 0 2 2 2 14 $4,140
Task 6 Project Management and Quality Control 6 12 8 0 6 0 2 34 $11,270 Task 7 Progress Meetings 10 10 0 0 10 0 0 30 $9,900
Task 8 Public Meeting Attendance 11 12 0 0 9 5 0 37 $11,695 Total Labor - All Tasks 58 95 22 8 100 141 12 436 $123,177 Out-of-Pocket Expenses $800
Total Budget $123,977
Docusign Envelope ID: FEE7FBFE-3C62-853C-8299-AA373609050B

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.17
File #: 0800-03
Item ID: 2026-536

Title: UC Davis Continuing Professional Education - Training Services Agreement Contact: Matt Nelson 916-774-5618 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a Training Services Agreement with University of California Davis in the amount of $82,000 to provide a customized in-person leadership program to a cohort of Electric Utility employees to enhance communication, build leadership capability, and support a more engaged and well- prepared employee community. Funding is included in the Electric Department's FY2026-27 budget in the Electric Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a Training Services Agreement with The Regents of the University of California, on behalf of its Davis Campus Continuing and Professional Education, to provide a leadership training program and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
By providing specialized leadership training, Roseville Electric Utility is investing in the continued growth and development of its workforce as it strengthens internal pathways for advancement. UC Davis' practical, in-person leadership program aligns with goals to enhance communication, build leadership capability, and support a more engaged and well-prepared employee community. The curriculum is organized into three progressive phases: Self-Awareness & Foundational Leadership, Communication & Collaboration Skills, and Leadership Readiness, Coaching & Succession. The total cost for one Leadership Program cohort will not exceed $82,000, which reflects all components of the program, including nine in- person training classes, consulting services, and up to 75 hours of coaching services.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of the Training Services Agreement with University of California Davis will not exceed $82,000.

Funding is included in the Electric Department's FY2026-27 budget in the Electric Fund. There is no impact on the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The training program meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Matt Nelson, Senior Electric Business Analyst

Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-283

2. Exhibit A - Proposal

3. Agreement UC Davis TSA Roseville

REVIEWERS:

Matt Nelson, Electric Department - All Created/Initiated - 6/18/2026 Joanna Cucchi, Electric Department - Financial & Administrative Approved - 6/18/2026 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 6/22/2026 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 6/23/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 7/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/3/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/6/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/6/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 7/6/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 7/7/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-283

APPROVING A TRAINING SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE AND THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ON BEHALF

OF ITS DAVIS CAMPUS CONTINUING AND PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Training Services Agreement for a customized in-person leadership program for Electric Utility employees, by and between the City of Roseville and The Regents of the University of California, on behalf of its Davis Campus Continuing and Professional Education, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

PROPOSAL:

Leadership Program

Developed for:

City of Roseville Electric Utility

February 2026

Dear Shawn,

Thank you for the opportunity to present UC Davis Continuing and Professional Education’s revised proposal for a custom Leadership Program for the City of Roseville Electric Utility. We are here to help support your leadership and employee development initiatives.

We understand that Roseville Electric Utility is investing in the continued growth and development of its workforce as it strengthens internal pathways for advancement. Our practical, in-person leadership programs align with your goals to enhance communication, build leadership capability, and support a more engaged and well-prepared employee community.

We made the requested changes:

• Changing the DISC Assessment and Succession Planning classes to Decision Maker as a Leader and Design Thinking class
• Reduced the coaching participants to fifteen (15) participants from thirty (30) o Please note that we have budgeted three (3) hours per participant in this proposal. Our recommendation is no minimum than three (3) hours per participant

The above changes have resulted in these two updated delivery and price options:
• 9 full days of training classes
• 7 full-days and 2 half-days of training classes

Please review this proposal and let us know if you have any further questions.

Warmly,
Monica and Ruth

UCD Continuing and Professional Education
Contract and Grants Portfolio

TRAINING COMPONENTS

CONTRACT STRUCTURE
UCD CPE proposes an open-ended contract structure that allows the City of Roseville Electric Utility to utilize all that CPE Contracts and Grants offer. This includes but is not limited to:
- Customized Cohort Training
- Coaching

LEADERSHIP PROGRAM
UC Davis Continuing and Professional Education (UCD-CPE) will provide up to one (1) cohort delivery of a customized Leadership Program consisting of nine (9) days classroom instruction at a City of Roseville Electric Utility location in Roseville. The curriculum is organized into three progressive phases: Self- Awareness & Foundational Leadership, Communication & Collaboration Skills, and Leadership Readiness, Coaching & Succession. The list of courses and sequence of delivery outlined below represents our proposed structure and may be refined by mutual agreement between the City of Roseville Electric Utility and UC Davis CPE based on participant needs and instructor availability.

The courses below are listed in our proposed format. The list of topics can be revised by mutual agreement of the City of Roseville Electric Utility and UCD-CPE. The exact sequence of classes within a segment may change subject to instructor availability.

Class 1: Embracing a Growth Mindset
Participants will learn how to build trust, enhance transparency, and foster open communication during periods of transition. Strategies for managing resistance, engaging stakeholders, delivering clear messaging, and maintaining morale through change initiatives will be discussed.

Class 2: Decision Maker for a Leader
Participants will be introduced to a decision-making model and learn to recognize frequent barriers to making decisions. This interactive workshop will include case studies and group discussion, allowing for different perspectives to be examined around the decisions posed.

Class 3: Communication Skills in the Workplace
When communication is effective, we benefit by saving time while improving productivity. In this class, participants will examine barriers to communication and learn ways to reduce them.

In addition, they will practice the skills necessary for effectively sending and receiving communication.

Class 4: Leading with Emotional Intelligence
Emotional Intelligence is the ability to consciously align behaviors to a desired outcome. This workshop will help participants understand the key skills that make up emotional intelligence and then identify specific tools and strategies to improve their own emotional intelligence in the workplace.

Class 5: Conversation with Intent
No matter how competent we are, we all have conversations that cause anxiety and frustration.

In difficult conversations, the opinions of the parties involved are varied, and emotions have the potential for running strong. This session will offer participants a step-by-step approach to

UCD Continuing and Professional Education
Contract and Grants Portfolio

having tough conversations with less stress and more success.

Class 6: The Language of Leadership
The phrase "words matter" is especially applicable in the leadership world. Successful leaders use language to create a workplace culture that increases team engagement. This course will help participants learn to use language purposefully, to build a culture that breeds inclusivity and high performance.

Class 7: Building High Performance Teams
As much as any other area of skill, today’s leaders must understand the dynamics of effective teams, as well as strategies for motivating and formulating strong teams. This session will help participants build an effective team, as well as look at techniques to strengthen a team. This class will also explore building trust and the importance of trust as a leader.

Class 8: Design Thinking
Design thinking is an iterative approach to solving problems with cross-functional teams. This course introduces the design thinking approach using interactive exercises that give the participants exposure to some of the techniques and methods of design thinking.

Class 9: The Art of Delegation
Effective delegation techniques allow leaders to save time, develop associates and motivate staff. This workshop explores a model for delegation, identifying ways to give clear instructions, build confidence and monitor the status of tasks without hovering.

COACHING SESSIONS
Coaches help to focus development efforts for the greatest impact. During the program, fifteen (15) participants will receive up to three coaching sessions focusing on the 360 assessment and assistance in creating an action plan to support the goals established during the program.

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
For the Leadership Program to be successful, participants must be committed to completing any pre- course assessments, active involvement during the program and group work, and implementing action after the program back into the workplace. It is also critical that participants’ managers support their attendance in the program, including group project work, and commit to supporting their leadership goals resulting from the program. UCD-CPE recommends that program participants be nominated by the City of Roseville Electric Utility through an intentional nomination process or application that involves the participant’s managers and increases participant’s commitment to develop themselves through the program.

ELEMENTS FOR SUCCESS

Schedule
UCD-CPE instructor(s) will be scheduled by mutual agreement between UCD-CPE and client. If the instructor(s) identified is not available for a session, the client contact and the UCD -CPE contact will mutually agree on a new class date and time, and if necessary, new instructor(s).

Participant Lists

UCD Continuing and Professional Education
Contract and Grants Portfolio

The City of Roseville Electric Utility provides UCD-CPE with a copy of the roster (including email addresses) for each session for UCD- CPE Student Records. Please provide the participants’ first and last names, and their work email addresses (Excel format preferred). UCD-CPE agrees to provide the City of Roseville Electric Utility with attendance records for each course.

Miscellaneous
The following factors are critical to the success of these programs:
• As necessary, the City of Roseville Electric Utility key internal stakeholders participate in meetings with the UCD-CPE team to plan for the proposed workshops to meet organizational and participant needs.
• Participants’ supervisors support their attendance in the program • Participants commit to active involvement during the workshops and to implementing action, back into the workplace.

TRAINING COST
The total cost for one Leadership Program cohort including coaching will be $82,000. This price reflects all components of the program, including nine (9) full-day in-person training classes at a City of Roseville facility, customization (although the price may slightly less if you choose to have the off-the-shelf version of a course, without any customization), consulting services, and up to 75 hours of coaching services.

The total cost for one Leadership Program cohort including coaching will be $77,000. This price reflects all components of the program, including seven (7) full-day and two (2) half-day in-person training classes at a City of Roseville facility, customization (although the price may slightly less if you choose to have the off-the- shelf version of a course, without any customization), consulting services, and up to 75 hours of coaching services.

UCD Continuing and Professional Education
Contract and Grants Portfolio

UCD #A_______

UC Davis Agreement #A_____
CPE Agreement #C114667

TRAINING SERVICES AGREEMENT
City of Roseville
THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (“University”), on behalf of its Davis Campus Continuing and Professional Education (the “CPE”) and the CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a municipal corporation (“User”).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, The CPE has been established and is maintained to support University's pursuit of its constitutional objectives of instruction, research, and public service; and

WHEREAS, University is a public education institution accredited and has developed a training program (“Program”) and;

WHEREAS, User wishes to obtain major skills training courses for User’s personnel who provide related services in fulfillment of their goals and objectives;

NOW, THEREFORE, University shall furnish the following services to User.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Services: University shall present the program (“Program”) as more fully described in “Exhibit A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein (collectively, the “Services”). Additional work shall be performed only if authorized in advance by written amendment to this Agreement executed by both parties. To the extent that any provision of Exhibit A is inconsistent with this Agreement, this Agreement shall take precedence.

a. Limit on attendance: No more than thirty (30) persons per course session may attend without the prior written approval of the University.
b. Reschedule/cancel of class: The User will notify the University at least fifteen (15) calendar days before the start date of the impacted class. Cancellations include: low enrollment or organizational conflict. When a cancellation occurs, the User shall work collaboratively to reschedule any impacted class(es). University shall charge only for actual expenses incurred on behalf of the cancelled class (such as non-refundable deposits, development fees and travel expenses) plus indirect costs. If User cancels or reschedules a course within (10) calendar days before the start date of a class, they agree to pay 50% of the budgeted cost of any class(es) impacted by the change in schedule.

2. Term: The term of this Agreement shall be in accordance with the schedule and class structure as described in Exhibit A.

CPE Agreement #C114667
UCD #A_______

3. Payment: User shall pay University for Service as set forth in “Exhibit A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein. CPE will provide User thirty (30) days’ written notice of any proposed rate change and an option to amend or terminate the Agreement. User shall pay for Services within thirty (30) days of User’s receipt of University’s invoice. CPE reserves the right to suspend performance of Services if User fails to make payment in full within sixty (60) days.

4. Rules, Regulations, Policies and Guidelines: When on University property, User agrees to comply with all federal, state and local laws and University policies, as well as guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state, county and other local state public health officials and University health and wellness standards, which may change from time-to-time with little or no notice. User is responsible for ensuring that its directors, officers, agents, employees, and participants who will participate in the Services at University property, comply with all applicable requirements.

5. Indemnification: The parties agree to defend, indemnify and hold one another harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, expense, attorneys’ fees, or claims for injury or damages arising from the performance of this Agreement, but only in proportion to and to the extent such liability, loss, expense, attorneys’ fees, or claims for injury or damages are caused by or result from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the indemnifying party, its officers, agents, students, or employees.

6. Insurance: University is self-insured under California law. University shall maintain this program of self-insurance throughout the term of this Agreement with retentions as follows:
a. General Liability (and professional liability) coverage with a per occurrence limit of a minimum of one million dollars ($1,000,000).

b. Auto Liability including non-owned automobiles, with a minimums as follows:

i. Bodily injury

1. Per person $1,000,000

2. Per accident $1,000,000
ii. Property damage $1,000,000

c. Workers Compensation insurance in accordance with California state law.

d. Employer’s Liability coverage in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000).

e. If requested by User in writing University shall provide, upon receipt of a fully-executed Agreement, a Certificate of Self-Insurance naming User, its officers, agents, and employees, individually and collectively as additional insured (except for Worker's Compensation Insurance) for services provided under this Agreement.

f. Coverage shall apply as primary insurance and any other insurance or self-insurance maintained by the User, its officers, agents, and employees should be excess only. This

CPE Agreement #C114667
UCD #A_______

insurance shall not be canceled or changed without a minimum of thirty (30) days advance, written notice given to User.
g. Upon University’s request, User shall provide University written evidence of User’s insurance coverage relevant to the presence or activity of User, its officers, agents, and employees while in, on or about University property or in connection with this Agreement. In the event User’s coverage is not acceptable to University, University shall have the right to immediately suspend Services. If User fails to provide acceptable insurance within ten (10) days after University’s written notice, University may terminate this Agreement.

7. Non-Liability of University:

a. Consequential Damages: University shall not be liable for any loss of profits, claims against User by any third party, or consequential damages.

b. Delay/Desired Result: University shall incur no liability to User or to any third party for any loss, cost, claim or damage, either direct or consequential, arising from University's delay in performance or failure to perform Services, or failure to achieve a desired result.

c. Liability Limitation: University’s liability for damages shall not exceed the total of all charges paid by User.

8. Confidential Information: During the course of this Agreement, User may provide University with information, data, or material that it regards as proprietary or confidential. Such information shall be marked or stamped “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION”. If communicated orally to University, User shall submit confirmation in writing within five (5) days of such disclosure. Notwithstanding, the foregoing, University agrees to safeguard names and addresses of individuals received through the performance of this Agreement in accordance with Welfare and Institution Code Section 10850.

a. University’s Obligation: University shall treat User’s Confidential Information in the same manner as University treats its own similar information. Upon User’s written request, University shall use reasonable means to protect User’s Confidential Information by means not normally employed by University, however, University shall have no obligation to comply with any such request by User. Should such protection occur, any related costs shall be borne by User. University shall not be liable for inadvertent disclosure of Confidential Information provided University has exercised reasonable care. b. Exempt Information: Confidential Information does not include information that is (i) not exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Calif. Gov. Code sec. 7920.000 et seq.); (ii) otherwise available to the public; (iii) rightfully received from a third party not in breach of an obligation of confidentiality; (iv) independently developed by University; (v) previously known to University; or (vi) produced in compliance with a court order or when required by law. University shall give reasonable notice to User that Confidential Information is being sought by a third party, to afford

CPE Agreement #C114667
UCD #A_______

User an opportunity to limit or prevent disclosure. Any defense against disclosure shall be at User’s sole initiative, risk, cost, and expense. University is not obligated to participate in any defense against such request for disclosure. Upon User’s request, University agrees to cease using all Confidential Information and to return it promptly to User.

c. Time Limitation: University shall not divulge User’s Confidential Information for a period of three (3) years following termination of this Agreement, or earlier if User makes or allows its Confidential Information to become public knowledge, or by communicating such Confidential Information to a party not bound by an obligation of confidentiality.

d. Disposition of Confidential Information: Upon completion of Services or termination of this Agreement, by User’s written request, University shall return any Confidential Information. Absent such request, CPE shall destroy or dispose of it according to its established procedures.

9. Disclaimer of Warranty: UNIVERSITY MAKES NO WARRANTY AS TO RESULTS TO BE

OBTAINED BY USER FROM THE USE OF ANY SERVICES AND/OR FACILITIES PROVIDED BY UNIVERSITY UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. THERE ARE NO EXPRESS

OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED

WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

10. University's Right to Use Data: University shall have the unrestricted right to use for its own purposes, including publication, any data or information which it may develop in connection with or as a result of performing the Services described in Exhibit A.

11. Ownership of Workshop Deliverables: University shall own and retain all rights, including copyrights, in all course materials and other works prepared by University under this Agreement.

12. Use of University's Name: User shall not use the name or mark of University in any form or manner in advertisements, reports, or other information released to the public without the prior written approval of University.

13. Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving the other party thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of such action.

14. Force Majeure: Neither party shall be liable for delays due to causes beyond the party’s control, including, but not limited to, acts of God, war, public enemy, civil disturbances, earthquakes, fires, floods, epidemics, pandemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, rolling blackouts, terrorist threats or actions on University property and unusually severe weather, performance shall be excused for a period commensurate with the period of impossibility.

University is a land-grant institution with a mission of teaching, research, public service and patient care, and it is required to recover the full cost of providing services to non-University

CPE Agreement #C114667
UCD #A_______

entities such as User, and as a non-profit entity, makes no profit. Therefore, University does not have reserves from which to pay for expenditures made on behalf of User for which it is not reimbursed. In the event of a force majeure, User shall be responsible for payment of all expenses incurred to the point at which University gives or receives notice of the impossibility.

If the impossibility becomes permanent, University will make best efforts to cancel or mitigate all outstanding financial commitments, and User shall be responsible for the cost of any remaining obligations.

15. Federal Contract Compliance: If this Agreement is funded wholly or in part with by a grant or contract from an agency of the federal government, University shall comply with all terms and conditions applicable to recipients of such funds and their contractors.

16. Conflict of Interest: User affirms that, to the best of User’s knowledge, no University employee who has participated in University’s decision-making concerning this Agreement has an “economic interest” in this Agreement or User. A University employee’s “economic interest” means:
a. An investment worth $2,000 or more in User or its affiliate; b. A position as director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or manager of User or its affiliate;

c. Receipt during the past 12 months of $500 in income or $440 in gifts from User or its affiliate; or

d. A personal financial benefit from this Agreement in the amount of $250 or more.

In the event of a change in these economic interests, User shall provide written notice to University within thirty (30) days after such change, noting such changes. User shall not be in a reporting relationship to a University employee who is a near relative, nor shall a near relative be in a decision-making position with respect to User.

17. Tobacco-free Campus: University is a tobacco-free institution. Use of cigarettes, cigars, oral tobacco, electronic cigarettes and all other tobacco products is prohibited on all University owned or leased sites.

18. Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action: University will abide by the requirements set forth in Executive Orders 11246 and 11375. Where applicable, University will abide by 41 CFR §§ 60-

1.4(a), 60-300.5(a) and 60-741.5(a), incorporated by reference with this statement: “This contractor and subcontractor shall abide by the requirements of 41 CFR §§ 60-1.4(a), 60- 300.5(a) and 60-741.5(a). These regulations prohibit discrimination against qualified individuals based on their status as protected veterans or individuals with disabilities, and prohibit discrimination against all individuals based on their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Moreover, these regulations require that covered prime contractors and subcontractors take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment individuals without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual

CPE Agreement #C114667
UCD #A_______

orientation, gender identity, national origin, protected veteran status or disability.” With respect to activities occurring in the State of California, University agrees to adhere to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. University will provide User on request a breakdown of its labor force by groups as specified by University, and will discuss with University its policies and practices relating to its affirmative action programs. University will not maintain or provide facilities for employees at any establishment under its control that are segregated on a basis prohibited by federal law. Separate or single-user restrooms and necessary dressing or sleeping areas must be provided, however, to ensure privacy.

19. CANRA: University represents and warrants that it complies with the California Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act (“CANRA”). Failure to comply with CANRA will constitute a material breach of the Agreement and be grounds for termination.

20. Notices: Notices shall be directed to the appropriate parties at the following addresses:

ADDITIONAL UNIVERSITY ADDITIONAL USER
Sally Vidal City of Roseville
Contracts & Rates Analyst Attn: Electric Utility Director Continuing & Professional Education 311 Vernon Street
University of California, Davis Roseville, CA 95678
463 California Drive E-mail: [email protected] Davis, CA 95616
E-mail: [email protected]

21. Attorneys’ Fees: If any action at law or equity is brought to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, including collection of delinquent payment, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.

22. Relationship of the Parties: The parties to this Agreement shall be and remain at all times independent contractors, neither being the employee, agent, representative, or User of the other in their relationship under this Agreement.

23. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be construed pursuant to California law.

24. Amendment: No change in any term or condition of this Agreement shall become effective unless by amendment in writing signed by both parties.

UNIVERSITY USER
Program Manager Shawn Matchim
Continuing & Professional Education Chief Operating Officer University of California, Davis Roseville Electric
463 California Drive 116 S. Grant Street
Davis, CA 95616 Roseville, CA 95678
E-mail: [email protected]

CPE Agreement #C114667
UCD #A_______

25. Severability: If a provision of this Agreement becomes, or is determined to be, illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, that will not affect the legality, validity, or enforceability of any other provision of the Agreement or of any portion of the invalidated provision that remains legal, valid, or enforceable.

26. Entire Agreement: The terms of User’s addendum or purchase order shall have no effect on the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the terms and conditions applicable to the Services provided hereunder and constitutes the entire understanding of the parties respecting the subject matter hereof, superseding any prior understanding or Agreement between them, written or oral, regarding the same subject matter.

[Signatures on next page]

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

UCD #A_______

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. _________________, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the day of ________________, 2026, and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ON BEHALF OF THE DAVIS CAMPUS has caused this Agreement to be duly executed.

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

THE REGENTS OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a municipal
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ON corporation

BEHALF OF THE DAVIS CAMPUS

By: By:

DOMINICK CASEY
City Manager

Date: __________________________ Date:

ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney

APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: ________________________________

DAN BEANS
Electric Utility Director

UCD #A_______

EXHIBIT A
Scope of Services for City of Roseville Electric Utility Leadership Program Payment and Invoicing, the invoice, summary report and/or transaction/payroll ledger shall be certified by the University's Financial Contact and the Pl (or their respective designees).

Invoicing frequency
Monthly Bill per CoHortBill per end of Contract

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.18
File #: 0900-04-02 & 0201-
01 Item ID: 2026-552

Title: Roseville Parkway Widening - Phase 1 Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Karen Vences 916-774-5412 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a construction agreement with Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. in the amount of $3,658,269 for the construction of the Roseville Parkway Widening - Phase 1 Project, and approval of a budget adjustment to fully fund the construction in the amount of $1,750,000 from the North Central Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1 and Traffic Mitigation Funds. The scope of the Project consists of widening portions of Roseville Parkway from West Drive to Creekside Ridge Drive and adding a third left-turn lane at southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway.

Improvements also include modifications to existing traffic signals, sidewalks, curb and gutter, updated signing and striping, and necessary utility adjustments. Work is expected to begin summer 2026 and be completed by early 2027. This project is also supported by funding previously appropriated from the North Central Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1. No General Fund resources will be used for the project.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution approving an agreement for the Roseville Parkway Widening - Phase 1 Project with Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.; and

3. Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $1,750,000 to fully fund project construction.

BACKGROUND
Roseville Parkway is a multi-lane arterial roadway providing connection from Northwest Roseville to East Roseville. The number of lanes vary from two to three lanes. The Council-adopted North Central Roseville Specific Plan (NCRSP) Roadway Improvement Project combined improvements to widen Roseville Parkway from Creekside Ridge Drive to East Gibson Drive from three lanes to four lanes in each direction, and increase the number of left turn lanes from southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway from two to three lanes. This section of the Roseville Parkway corridor experiences heavy traffic congestion on a daily basis due in part to popular shopping and dining destinations in the area. Based on available funding, the NCRSP Roadway Improvement Project was divided into two phases,

known as the Roseville Parkway Widening - Phase 1 Project and the Roseville Parkway Widening - Phase 2 Project.

Phase 1 of the project includes:
o Adding a third left-turn lane on southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway;
o Extending the right turn lane on northbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway;
o Adding a bus turnout on Roseville Parkway between West Drive and Reserve Drive; o Extending the westbound right-turn lane onto northbound Galleria Boulevard to Creekside Ridge Drive; and
o Constructing intersection improvements at Roseville Parkway and Galleria Boulevard.

Improvements will also incorporate modifications to existing traffic signals, sidewalks, curb and gutter, updated signing and striping, and necessary utility adjustments. Phase 1 of the project will incorporate improvements necessary for the ultimate roadway widening, which will be completed in Phase 2 when funding becomes available.

At the February 18, 2026, meeting, Council approved the plans and specifications for the project and authorized staff to call for bids. The bid opening was held on May 19, 2026, and a total of six bids were received. The following is a summary of the engineer's estimate and the three lowest bids received:

Engineer's Estimate $3,500,000.00
Central Valley Engineering
& Asphalt, Inc.
$3,658,269.00
Granite Construction
Company
$4,022,000.00
Zara Construction $4,124,993.80

Staff recommend awarding the construction contract to Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc.

Construction of the project is anticipated to begin in summer 2026 and be completed by early 2027.

Temporary lane closures and shoulder closures can be expected during construction; however, all roads will remain open throughout the project. No day work will occur during the holiday season to avoid traffic impacts and, if necessary, night work will be limited. Depending on the contractor’s operation, the contract requires work to be performed during both daytime and nighttime hours. The determination of appropriate working hours considers construction crew safety, traffic operations, and impacts on nearby residents and businesses.

PUBLIC OUTREACH
Since 2022, the Roseville Parkway Widening Project has been driven by robust public participation, including, but not limited to: a community open house, stakeholder representative group meetings, online surveys, news media coverage, signage, email newsletters and social media updates. Details about the project can be found at roseville.ca.gov/ParkwayWidening. Staff will continue to engage with the

community as the project moves forward.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project was previously funded by $5,828,031 in North Central Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1 funds. The requested budget adjustment of $1,750,000 appropriates funds from the North Central Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1 and Traffic Mitigation Funds to fully fund project construction, change order authority, construction management, right-of-way acquisition fees, and staff costs. The new total project budget will be $7,578,031. No General Fund resources will be used for construction of this project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Project level CEQA compliance for the Roseville Parkway Widening Project was accomplished with preparation of the Roseville Parkway Widening Project Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted February 18, 2026). The proposed action is to award the construction contract for the Project.

The selected contractor would be required to adhere to all findings, conclusions, and applicable mitigation measures within the Roseville Parkway Widening Project Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. No new effects would be expected to occur as part of the construction contract award. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Karen Vences, Assistant Engineer

Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Location Map

2. Resolution 26-258

3. Contractor Agreement

4. Ordinance 7088

5. Proposal - Agreement Attachment

6. Notice to Contractors - Agreement Attachment

7. Bid Summary Sheet

8. Notice of Intent to Award

REVIEWERS:

Karen Vences, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Created/Initiated - 6/22/2026 Jesse Khatkar, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Approved - 6/22/2026 Noah Siviglia, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Approved - 6/24/2026 Stefanie Kemen, Public Works Department - Administration Division Approved - 6/24/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/25/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/25/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/25/2026

Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 7/2/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 7/2/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 7/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 7/6/2026

VILLEPARKWAYROSE
ROSE
GALLERIA BLVD.

HIGHWAY 65
GALLERIA BLVD.

EKA RD.EUR
EASTU.P.R.R.U.P.R.R.CREEKSIDERIDGE DR.PLEASANTBLVD.GROVE

RESERVE DRIVE

ROSEVILLE PARKWAY WIDENING
PHASE 
PROJECTLOCATION 0APPROJECT LOCATION

RESOLUTION NO. 26-258

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

CENTRAL VALLEY ENGINEERING & ASPHALT, INC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an Agreement for the Roseville Parkway Widening – Phase 1 Project, by and between the City of Roseville and Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO. 7088

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2026-27, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Roseville Parkway Widening Phase 1 Project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 06/03/2026

Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCAL YEAR:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION

3002

6587

84001

500116

900,000
Increase Capital Outlay CIP Projects budget for the
Roseville Parkway Widening & Pleasant Grove
Boulevard Triple Lefts project

3151

6587

84001

500116

650,000
Increase Capital Outlay CIP Projects budget for the
Roseville Parkway Widening & Pleasant Grove
Boulevard Triple Lefts project

3151

5080

84001

500116

200,000
Increase Internal Project Labor budget for the Roseville Parkway Widening & Pleasant Grove Boulevard Triple
Lefts project

7413

6810

10001

266,694
Establish Transfer Out to North CFD 1 Capital Fund for
the Roseville Parkway Widening & Pleasant Grove
Boulevard Triple Lefts project

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 2,016,694

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION

3002

4810

10001

266,694
Establish Transfer in from North Central CFD 1 Fund for the Roseville Parkway Widening & Pleasant Grove
Boulevard Triple Lefts project

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL 266,694

NET ADJUSTMENT 1,750,000

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project DESCRIPTION
3002 3601 00000 000000 (633,306) Decrease North Central CFD 1 Capital Fund Balance 3151 3601 00000 000000 (850,000) Decrease Traffic Mitigation Fund Balance 7413 3601 00000 000000 (266,694) Decrease North Central CFD 1 Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (1,750,000)

Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Public Works Department is requesting a budget adjustment of $1,750,000 to increase the Roseville Parkway Widening and Pleasant Grove Boulevard Triple Lefts project (500116) budget from available resources in the North Central CFD 1 Capital (3002) fund and Traffic Mitigation (3151) fund. This budget adjustment will transfer $266,694 out of the North Central CFD 1 fund (7413) to the North Central CFD 1 Capital fund (3002) to cover additional funding that is needed for the project.

Additional funding is needed for construction, construction management, right-of-way acquisition fees, and design support during construction.

The current project budget is $5,828,031. With this adjustment, the revised project budget will total $7,578,031. 2026-27
Karen Vences, Assistant Engineer
Karen Vences, Assistant Engineer
Public Works/Engineering

NTC - 1
[B:\Public Works\CIP\1_Current Projects\NCR CFD Improvement Project\Bidding\2. Advertisement\Addendum 2\NTC_RPW Phase 1 Addendum 2.docx; 5/5/2026]

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Name of Project: ROSEVILLE PARKWAY WIDENING (PHASE 1) PROJECT City of Roseville Contract: 500116

NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT sealed Proposal will be received at the Office of the City Clerk, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California, until Tuesday, May 19 th, 2026 at 3:00
p.m. Late proposals will be rejected. No exceptions.

The Proposals will be publicly opened and read by the City Clerk or designee of the City of Roseville at 3:05 p.m. on Tuesday, May 19th, 2026 at the Office of the City Clerk located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville California for the following project: ROSEVILLE PARKWAY WIDENING (PHASE 1) PROJECT.

A pre-bid meeting will be held at NOT APPLICABLE.

A Project Manual, including all Contract Documents and the Proposal forms for bidding this project, may be obtained on-line from the City of Roseville’s website at https://www.roseville.ca.us/business/procurement_services/bids_rfps. All communications relative to this project shall be conducted through Public Purchase.

Bids shall be submitted on the City’s Proposal Forms included in the Project Manual, plainly endorsed with the Bidder’s name together with signed acknowledgement of any and all addenda. Proposal Forms shall be securely sealed in a suitable envelope marked with the name

NTC - 2
[B:\Public Works\CIP\1_Current Projects\NCR CFD Improvement Project\Bidding\2. Advertisement\Addendum 2\NTC_RPW Phase 1 Addendum 2.docx; 5/5/2026]
and address of the Bidder, and marked in capital letters on the front and back of the envelope as follows:

ROSEVILLE PARKWAY WIDENING (PHASE 1) PROJECT
(Name of Bidder)
(Address of Bidder)

Whether mailed or personally delivered, all bids shall be addressed to the City of Roseville, Office of the City Clerk, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California, 95678.

Each bid must be accompanied by a Bid Guaranty in the form of a Certificate of Deposit, Certified or Cashier’s Check, Bidder’s Bond or Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit in an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the Bidder’s Grand Total Price. The Bid Guaranty will be retained by the City and applied to any and all damages sustained by the City in the event that the successful Bidder fails or refuses to enter into the Contract awarded to it and to furnish all required bonds and Certificates of Insurance. The City intends to award the Contract to the lowest responsible Bidder based on the Grand Total Bid Price for all components of the Project.

To the extent allowed by law, the City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and/or to waive any irregularities or informalities in any bid or in the bidding procedure. The City specifically reserves the right to not award the Contract after the opening of bids.

Any bid may be withdrawn at any time prior to the time fixed in the public notice for the deadline submission of bids only by written request for the withdrawal of the bid filed with the City Clerk. The request shall be executed by the Bidder or his or her duly authorized representative. The withdrawal of a bid does not prejudice the right of the Bidder to file a new bid by the submission deadline. Whether or not bids are opened exactly at the time fixed in the

NTC - 3
[B:\Public Works\CIP\1_Current Projects\NCR CFD Improvement Project\Bidding\2. Advertisement\Addendum 2\NTC_RPW Phase 1 Addendum 2.docx; 5/5/2026]
public notice for opening bids, a bid will not be received after the deadline submission of bids nor may any bid be withdrawn after the time fixed in the public notice for deadline for submission of bids. Immediately following the deadline for submission of bids all bids shall become the property of the City of Roseville and the City is under no obligation to return bids.

Bids will be examined and reported to the City Council within sixty (60) business days after the bid opening. Except as permitted by applicable law, no Bidder may withdraw its bid for a period of sixty (60) business days after the date of bid opening. Each Bidder will be notified of any award of the Contract by the City.

The City will affirmatively ensure non-discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status in the award and administration of contracts that it awards.

Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300, the successful Bidder may submit certain securities in lieu of the City withholding retention of payments during the Project.

The City has determined that the Contractor shall possess a valid CLASS A, GENERAL ENGINEERING Contractor's license at the time that the bid is submitted, as well as any other license classification as may be required by the laws of the California for the performance of the work specified in the Contract Documents. Said license shall be maintained during the Contract period. Failure to possess the specified license shall render the bid nonresponsive and will act as a bar to the award of the Contract to any Bidder not possessing such a license at the time of bid submittal. The Contractor shall provide certification of the license, its number and the expiration date on the proposal form.

NTC - 4
[B:\Public Works\CIP\1_Current Projects\NCR CFD Improvement Project\Bidding\2. Advertisement\Addendum 2\NTC_RPW Phase 1 Addendum 2.docx; 5/5/2026]
The work is to be done in Placer County. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1773, the City has ascertained the General Prevailing Rate of Wages in the County in which the work is to be done to be as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations of the State of California. The Contractor is hereby made aware that information regarding prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm. The Contractor is required to post a copy of the applicable wage rates at the job site. Attention is directed to Section 7 “Legal Relations and Responsibility” of the Standard Construction Specifications.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.1(b), notice is hereby given that a contractor or subcontractor shall not be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in Labor Code Sections 1720, et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5 or exempt from registration requirements pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5(f). It is not a violation of Labor Code Section 1771.1 for an unregistered contractor to submit a bid that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the contractor is registered to perform work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5 at the time the contract is awarded or is exempt from registration requirements pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5(f). The Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

All questions prior to the deadline for bid submissions shall be directed to the attention of KAREN VENCES via PUBLIC PURCHASE. The deadline for submissions of questions and

NTC - 5
[B:\Public Works\CIP\1_Current Projects\NCR CFD Improvement Project\Bidding\2. Advertisement\Addendum 2\NTC_RPW Phase 1 Addendum 2.docx; 5/5/2026]
clarifications regarding the Contract Documents is Tuesday, May 12th, 2026 at 3:00 PM. Only Addenda issued by the City are binding.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Roseville

Dated: _____________________________
Published: ________________________

311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD

Date: June 8, 2026
To: All bidders, concerning the Roseville Parkway Widening (Phase 1) Project From: Public Works Engineering
Subject: Notice of Intent to Award

Regarding the Roseville Parkway Widening (Phase 1) Project, for which the call for bids was released on April 10, 2026 and for which bids were received, by the City Clerk’s office on May 19, 2026; a lowest bid from a contractor meeting the qualifications outlined in the bid documents was received.

The City has determined Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt Inc. as qualified lowest bidder and intends to recommend City Council approval contract award at the July 15, 2026 City Council Meeting.

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 7/15/2026
Item #: VI.19
File #: 0203-013
Item ID: 2026-569

Title: Asphalt Products (RFQ 10-3447) - Reject all Bids Contact: Sue Jessup 916-746-1107 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends that all bids received for Request for Quotations (RFQ) 10-3447 for Asphalt Products be rejected. During review, Public Works Department (PWD) staff determined the bid specifications should have included a “commercial grade” mix, in addition to the "performance grade" mix. PWD will revise the specifications and issue a new RFQ at a later date. There is no fiscal impact at this time, as there will be no purchase order awarded.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution rejecting all bids received for Request for Quotations (RFQ) 10-3447 for the purchase of asphalt products.

BACKGROUND
RFQ 10-3447 was issued in May 2026 for the purchase of asphalt products. The bid specifications required the asphalt to be a “performance grade” mix and did not include provisions for a “commercial grade” mix. Upon staff review, it was determined that additional specifications are needed to properly evaluate submittals. Staff recommends that all bids received be rejected, and staff will add clarifying language to the specifications and issue a new RFQ at a later date.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact at this time since there is no award.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The rejection of bids meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

6. Deliver exceptional City services

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Sue Jessup, Buyer

Scott Pettingell, Finance Director