City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
16 Prepared by: J. Grace
The DOC is the Roseville Electric
Utility Department Command Post
during times of emergencies. The
DOC functions similarly to the EOC,
but at a department level. The DOC
coordinates strategic, operational
and tactical decisions for field
operations. If an emergency, such as
a widespread fire, necessitates the
citywide activation of the EOC, the
DOC will likely report directly to the
EOC command structure. An
independent DOC activation may be
authorized by specific electric
management staff.
Pursuant to the SEMS structure, the
City of Roseville participates in
annual training exercises. The
subject matter of the exercise is
chosen by the City of Roseville EMT.
The subject could be fire related in
nature but is variable and could be
changed from exercise to exercise.
The City of Roseville is a member of
the California Utility Emergency
Association (CUEA), which plays a key
role in ensuring communications
between utilities during
emergencies. CUEA serves as a point-of-contact for critical infrastructure utilities, Cal OES and other governmental agencies before, during and after an event to:
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
17 Prepared by: J. Grace
Facilitate communications
and cooperation between member
utilities and public agencies; and
with non-member utilities (where
resources and priorities allow).
Provide emergency response
support wherever practical for
electric, petroleum pipeline,
telecommunications, gas, water and
wastewater utilities.
Support utility emergency
planning, mitigation, training,
exercises and education.
Once activated, the EOC/DOC
utilizes the Planning Cycle to
establish a continuum for Incident
Action Planning (IAP) during both
emergency and non-emergency
operations and is an integral tool for
managing an emergency incident.
Sound, timely planning provides the foundation for effective incident management. The planning process represents a template for strategic, operational, and tactical planning that includes all steps that an Incident Command/Unified Command (IC/UC) and other members of the Command and General Staff should take to develop and disseminate an IAP.
The planning process may begin with the:
1. Scheduling of a planned event
2. Identification of a credible threat
3. Initial response to an actual or
impending incident
The process continues with the implementation
of the formalized steps and the staffing required
for the development of an IAP. Decisions on
preemptive power shutoff will be evaluated
based on the current (or pending) situation by
either EOC/DOC or the Electric Dispatch Center.
Incident
Electric
Only
Yes
Others
& Electric
Affected
Yes
or
Maintain Status
Quo/Terminate
Utility
Operational
Event
No Building
Event
Yes
No
Activate
DOC
Yes
Maintain Status
Quo/Terminate
Activate
EOC
Yes
No Electric
required at
EOC
Personnel No
Event
Yes Yes
Yes
No
No
Evacuate
Yes
Relocate
Services
Yes
Shelter in No
Place
Yes
Maintain Status
Quo/Terminate
Maintain Status
Quo/Terminate
No
No
or
Activate
DOC
Yes
Activate
DOC
Yes
Call 911
Maintain Status
Quo/Terminate
Yes
No Activate
DOC
Yes
No
No
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
18 Prepared by: J. Grace
Emergency Communications – Public Awareness During and Post Incident Emergency Communication Priority
The public's response to any emergency is based on an understanding of the nature of the emergency, the potential hazards, the response of emergency services, and knowledge of what individuals and groups should do to increase their chances of survival and recovery.
The magnitude of an emergency or disaster will directly affect the City of Roseville’s emergency operations communication and recovery efforts and what resources we use to disseminate that to the public.
Emergency Public Information EOC Procedure
Emergency Public Information (EPI) is a priority of utmost importance during emergencies and disasters. The City of Roseville EPI organization and procedures for the dissemination of accurate and timely instructions and information to the public during periods of emergency are as follows: response to media inquiries and calls from the public; establishment of a 24 hour EPI contact point; and, establishment of a Public Information Officer function of the EOC.
Emergency Public Information Resources
The following are resources we have at our discretion to use during an emergency:
City telephone system (Consolidated Communications land-lines). Designated emergency phone lines for information hotline and public information can be established. Emergency messages can be established on different main city voicemails to give out pertinent information. A Google number can be established for public information hotline if the need arises. Everbridge can be used to send alerts out to residents. Neighboring counties have access to this system and assist us in the use of this if needed. Everbridge includes the ability to call out to landlines as well as send messages to cell phones that have registered through Alert Placer. The company was initially focused on providing a way of sending 'Mass Notification' messages via SMS or email with very fast execution to ensure messages were received when there was a threat to life. Through acquisition of industry technologies and ongoing research & development, Everbridge has broadened its capabilities and now provides a Critical Event Management platform.
Cellular phone network (Verizon), each PIO and City communicator has a City-issued cell phone. City website has an emergency page and banner that can be activated. This can be edited and updated throughout the duration of the event.
Social Media. The City has several online social media accounts through several different platforms.
Facebook, Nextdoor, YouTube and Instagram can be used to push information out. Gov delivery email system (if practical and if working) can be used to send notifications to all utility billing customers. This also has a text function that can be used. Electronic Billboards.
Local and regional television media.
AM/FM Radio.
City Private Radio System.
EOC SharePoint Site (requires internet connection and VPN access to City IT Servers) will be used for internal communication.
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
19 Prepared by: J. Grace
External Communication Resources
The City of Roseville has the ability to work with local and state resources to ensure information is provided in a timely and efficient manner. The following are examples for the resources available:
Placer Operational Area Office of Emergency Services
The State of California, Office of Emergency Services (OES) CAL FIRE
Sacramento County
Yolo County
Emergency Public Information Assumptions
The City of Roseville trains and is prepared to handle the follow EPI assumptions of communication issues that will arise during an emergency:
The general public will demand information about the emergency situation and instructions on proper survival/response actions;
The media will demand information about the emergency; The local media will perform an essential role in providing emergency instructions and periodic updates to the public;
Depending on the severity of the emergency, or the media's perception of the severity of the emergency, regional and national media may also demand information and may play a role in reassuring (or alarming) distant relatives of disaster victims;
Depending on the severity of the emergency, telephone communications may be sporadic or impossible;
Local and regional radio/television stations without emergency power may also be off the air; telephones may be inoperative; and/or,
The emergency organization will become overwhelmed by the demand for information if sufficiently trained staff is not available.
Steps for Information Releases
Key Audiences and Stakeholders
•Determine what level of activation is necessary (1 Full, 2 Partial, 3 Monitor) •Consider declaration of emergency
•Initiaite EOC activation protocol and information release steps •Establish next update meeting for executive team
Yes
•Determine what level of communication is needed and to whom •Continue communciations protocol
•Establish next update meeting for executive team
No
Activate EOC?
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
20 Prepared by: J. Grace
We will consider the most effective method of communicating with each stakeholder group, as it may be different based on the group.
Important questions we will consider include:
Who will be most impacted and how?
Are there stakeholders who need to keep in the loop? How will we prioritize them? How will we effectively reach each stakeholder group if they are busy dealing with the emergency at hand? By categorizing the different interested parties, a strategy can be drafted for how to engage with each of them, in what order, and to what extent. The most critical stakeholders to engage with first will be those who have both influence and are impacted by the event.
Those stakeholders include, but are not limited to, Employees, Residents, City Council, Partner agencies/Cities/Placer County, Businesses, and Community Organizations.
General Template Response
Given its scale, scope, and type of scenario, each incident/crisis will require specific and more directly relevant responses.
We will incorporate more details as they become available during each incident/crisis, but we will include a status update, what we are doing to rectify the issue, the general impact on customers, what customers should do (in the event a call to action is necessary), and when we will provide updates.
The information will be tailored for each communication channel and could be included as part of:
The initial statement
Key message development for customer service
Common questions development for customer service, website copy, and social media posting Used for media relations
Serve as content for social media posting
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
21 Prepared by: J. Grace
6. WILDFIRE RISKS AND DRIVERS
Enterprise-Wide Safety Risks
Roseville Electric Utility’s approach to risk management includes an Enterprise Risk Profile (ERP) analysis with the goal of providing a unified picture of risks to the Utility, thereby improving the ability to manage the risks effectively.
Each risk analysis includes the following factors:
Likelihood
1. Effectiveness of controls and mitigations in
place
2. Number of processes and systems involved
3. Skills and competencies managing the risk
4. Political/regulatory environment
5. Time horizon
Velocity
1. Early detection opportunities
2. Reaction time available
3. Current mitigation strategies
4. Sudden or gradual impact
Trend – the likelihood or velocity of the risk is predicted to increase, remain constant or decrease over the next reporting period.
Ranking
1. Extremely high – very low level of comfort that
mitigations will reduce level of risk to an acceptable
level within the target timeframe. Immediate
corrective action is necessary.
2. High – relatively low level of comfort that mitigations will reduce level of risk to an acceptable level within the target timeframe. Corrective action within
specific period of time is necessary.
3. Medium – medium level of comfort that mitigations
will reduce the level of risk to an acceptable level
within the target timeframe. Corrective action is
necessary.
4. Low – high level of comfort that mitigations will
reduce the level of risk to an acceptable level within
the target timeframe. No corrective but monitoring
action is necessary.
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(J) (I, II)
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(L)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
22 Prepared by: J. Grace
REU Electric System Risks
Fire Risk Bowtie
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
23 Prepared by: J. Grace
Risk Prioritization
Roseville Electric Utility (REU) evaluates wildfire-related risks and drivers based on a combination of system design characteristics, field inspection data, and environmental context. Due to the relatively low wildfire exposure in REU’s service territory—where no overhead facilities exist within Tier 2 or Tier 3 High Fire Threat Districts and most distribution infrastructure is underground—identified risk drivers are not prioritized using a tiered scoring system. Instead, REU treats all wildfire-related risks with a consistent level of mitigation, inspection, and response effort to ensure uniform safety across the electric system. Where localized environmental or situational factors (e.g., proximity to open space, elevated vegetation density) present higher relative risk, these areas receive additional attention through targeted vegetation management and inspection cycles, but REU maintains a systemwide standard of care rather than a formal risk hierarchy.
Roseville Underground Facilities vs. Open Space Areas
Primary 12kV Underground Circuit Miles = 888.37
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
24 Prepared by: J. Grace
Roseville Overhead Facilities vs. Open Space Areas
60kV/12kV Overhead Circuit Miles = 141.8
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
25 Prepared by: J. Grace
Other Risks
Supply Challenges: Global trade tensions, accelerating electrification, rapid growth in data center development, and the prospect of new tariffs—rather than lingering COVID-19 effects—now dominate the supply-chain landscape. The increasing adoption of electric vehicles, building electrification, distributed energy resources, and energy-intensive data centers is creating unprecedented demand for utility infrastructure and equipment.
Unpredictable lead times, price volatility, and sporadic material shortages are lengthening construction schedules across the utility industry. To mitigate these risks, Roseville Electric Utility (REU) has extended its procurement forecasts for major capital projects to a 24-month horizon and is closely coordinating with key suppliers.
Key pressure points include:
• Raw-material constraints: Limited availability of metals (especially transformer steel, copper and aluminum), silicone and petroleum-based products (polyurethane, paint, PVC), select plastic resins, and fiber-optic components.
• Manufacturing capacity constraints: Strong nationwide demand for transformers, switchgear, breakers, and other utility-grade electrical equipment is extending production lead times, particularly as electrification initiatives and data center expansion accelerate. • Transportation bottlenecks: Port congestion, driver shortages in the trucking sector, and slower customs clearance for specialty equipment continue to impede deliveries. • Demand surge: Electrification initiatives, large commercial developments, and rapidly expanding data center investments are increasing competition for utility materials and equipment, intensifying price volatility and supply constraints.
REU remains actively engaged with regional and federal partners—including the U.S. Department of Energy— to quantify demand, highlight constraints, and advocate for policy solutions. Internally, REU has broadened its equipment specifications to qualify additional manufacturers, expanding sourcing options and bolstering supply resilience.
Qualified Labor: California’s market-wide demand for Qualified Electrical Workers (QEWs) remains high. While Roseville Electric Utility has been successful in retaining a well-trained QEW workforce, extraordinary circumstances could create temporary staffing gaps. Such shortages may delay scheduled maintenance and inspections, gradually increasing the risk of equipment failures across the Roseville system.
Electric Supply Lines: Under extreme conditions, disruptions affecting the Balancing Authority of Northern California (BANC) operating area or the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) transmission system could impact the delivery of wholesale power to Roseville. Although the likelihood of a widespread outage remains low due to multiple WAPA interconnections and system redundancies, these regional transmission assets operate outside of Roseville Electric Utility’s (REU) direct control.
In the event of a supply disruption, REU would maximize available internal generation resources and leverage available operational strategies to maintain service reliability. If additional actions became necessary, REU could implement controlled load-management measures to preserve overall grid stability while prioritizing service to critical facilities and essential customers.
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
26 Prepared by: J. Grace
Topographic and Climatological Risk Factors
Impacts from climate change are happening now. These impacts extend well beyond an increase in temperature, affecting ecosystems and communities in the United States and around the world. Things that we depend upon and value — water, energy, transportation, wildlife, agriculture, ecosystems, and human health — are experiencing the effects of a changing climate. [2] Climate change will make California more susceptible to extreme wildfires. By the year 2100, if greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, one study found that the frequency of extreme wildfires burning over 25,000 acres would increase by nearly 50 percent, and that average area burned statewide would increase by 77 percent by the end of the century. [3]
An extensive scientific review supported by the Fourth Assessment found that reducing tree density and restoring beneficial fire can improve long-term resilience to California’s forests. Simulations of large-scale fuels treatments in Sierra Nevada forests substantially reduce increases in burned area. Improving forest health by removing fuels can have important impacts to reduce rising wildfire insurance costs. Increasing understanding of megafires remains a critical research need for California. [3] The flatness of Roseville (as a whole) is a benefit, since steep canyons can make a heavier fuel load. Within Roseville Electric Utility’s service territory and the surrounding areas, the primary risk drivers for wildfires are the following:
Should climate change result in sustained higher temperatures, risk factors will include added stress on electrical equipment, leading to increased equipment failures and reduced reliability.
In an emergency, de-energization of circuits due to (or in preparation of) a major weather-related event would typically be directed from the Emergency Operation Center or Department Operation Center(see “Standardized Emergency Management System”, Section 5).
Open space areas are any open piece of land that is undeveloped (has no buildings or other built structures) and is accessible to the public. Open space can include:
• Green space (land that is partly or completely covered with grass, trees, shrubs, or other vegetation).
Green space includes parks, community gardens, and cemeteries. • Schoolyards
• Playgrounds
• Public seating areas
• Public plazas
• Vacant lots
Green space provides recreational areas for residents and helps to enhance the beauty and environmental quality of neighborhoods.
Extended drought
Vegetation type
Vegetation Density
Weather
High winds
Terrain
Changing Weather Patterns (Climate Change)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
27 Prepared by: J. Grace
7. WILDFIRE MITIGATION
Fire-Threat and Fire-Hazard Designations in Roseville
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) High Fire-Threat District (HFTD) designations affecting Roseville Electric Utility (REU) remain unchanged from prior evaluations. Based on a review completed in June 2026, no portion of REU’s electric service territory is located within CPUC Tier 2 (Elevated) or Tier 3 (Extreme) High Fire-Threat Districts. The nearest Tier 2 designation is located approximately 2 to 3 miles east of Roseville near the Granite Bay wildland-urban interface.
Separately, the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) issued updated 2025 Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps for Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs). On February 10, 2025, the City of Roseville received its official FHSZ designations pursuant to Senate Bill 63 and California Government Code §51179. These designations identify:
High FHSZ: Portions of Dry Creek, Secret Ravine, and the riparian preserve west of Fiddyment Road.
Moderate FHSZ: Additional open-space corridors, including Pleasant Grove Creek and Linda Creek, as well as scattered parcels along Roseville’s western urban fringe.
Unlike the CPUC HFTD classifications, which are utility wildfire risk designations, FHSZ classifications identify the inherent wildfire hazard of an area based on physical and environmental conditions. Although these mapped areas do not create additional regulatory requirements for REU, they inform the utility’s wildfire mitigation strategy and support enhanced internal monitoring, inspection, and vegetation management activities for overhead electric facilities located within or adjacent to these corridors.
FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES (hazard rather than risk designations) *cpuc.ca.gov
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(C)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
28 Prepared by: J. Grace
HFTD vs. FHSZ
Public Resource Code 4202; The State Fire Marshal shall classify lands within state responsibility areas into fire hazard severity zones. Each zone shall embrace relatively homogeneous lands and shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors present, including areas where winds have been identified by the department as a major cause of wildfire spread. Government Code 51178; The State Fire Marshal shall identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas.
Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread.
The Fire Hazard Severity Zone map evaluates “hazard,” not “risk”. The map is like flood zone maps, where lands are described in terms of the probability level of a particular area being inundated by floodwaters, and not specifically prescriptive of impacts. “Hazard” is based on the physical conditions that create a likelihood and expected fire behavior over a 30 to 50-year period without considering mitigation measures such as home hardening, recent wildfire, or fuel reduction efforts. “Risk” is the potential damage a fire can do to the area under existing conditions, accounting for any modifications such as fuel reduction projects, defensible space, and ignition resistant building construction.
The zones are used for several purposes including to designate areas where California’s defensible space standards and wildland urban interface building codes are required. They can be a factor in real estate disclosure, and local governments may consider them in their general plan.
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) sponsored map, known as "CPUC High Fire Threat District Map” (HFTD), includes similar factors as those in the FHSZ maps, however the CPUC HFTD Map is designed specifically for identifying areas where there is an increased risk for utility associated wildfires. As such, the CPUC map includes fire hazards associated with historical powerline-caused wildfires, current fuel conditions, and scores areas based on where fires start, as opposed to where potential fires may cause impacts.
Roseville is in a Local Responsibility Area (LRA), meaning the financial responsibility of preventing and suppressing wildfires is primarily the responsibility of a Local agency (city, county, city and county, or district).
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(K)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
29 Prepared by: J. Grace
City Wildfire Reduction Zone
The area designated as the “City Wildfire Reduction Zone” (WRZ) incorporates a specific section of Miners Ravine that runs through a portion of the city. This is a self-designated area (mostly an open space area) that has increased precautionary measures for electric utility inspections and fire-prevention maintenance actions.
City Wildfire Reduction Zone
For reference:
CPUC Tier 2/Tier 3 HFTD = utility wildfire risk maps
OSFM FHSZ = wildfire hazard maps
LRA = fire protection jurisdiction
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
30 Prepared by: J. Grace
Grid Hardening
Roseville adopted a Cal Fire approved expulsion proof fusing for all overhead transformer assets within the WRZ, which are ideal for areas prone to grass fires with the goal of wildfire-risk reduction.
The S&C Fault-Tamer Fuse Limiter is a drop-in replacement for a standard overhead cut-out that merges an expulsion fuse link with a sand-filled, high-speed current-limiting element inside one sealed tube. Designed for distribution systems and interrupting currents up to 100 kA, it mounts on the existing hinge without structural changes. During low-energy faults the expulsion link blows and the tube drops open for visual isolation; during severe faults the current-limiting core quenches the arc in less than half a cycle, so no molten particles or sparks are expelled—earning “Spark Production Class A” certification and virtually eliminating fuse-related ignition sources in open-space corridors and the Wildfire Reduction Zone.
In 2025, this project was expanded to include the replacement of all overhead transformer fusing located in the City’s open-space areas with expulstion-proof fusing.
.
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
31 Prepared by: J. Grace
Design and Construction Standards
Roseville Electric Utility’s electric facilities are designed and constructed to meet or exceed the relevant Federal, State, or industry standards. REU treats CPUC General Order (GO) 95 and GO128 as a key industry standard for design and construction standards for overhead and underground electrical facilities. REU meets or exceeds all standards in GO95, GO128, and GO165. For example, if a wood pole in Roseville passes an intrusive test, Roseville will perform another intrusive test in roughly five years, instead of the 20-year maximum allowed by CPUC General Orders. Additionally, REU monitors and follows, as appropriate, national and/or California Electric Safety Codes. In the self-designated City Wildfire Reduction Zone, Roseville has installed Cal Fire approved faulttamer equipment, which is intended to result in no sparking on the ground should a fault occur.
Vegetation Management
Roseville Electric Utility meets or exceeds the minimum industry standard vegetation management practices.
For distribution level facilities, Roseville Electric Utility meets (1) Public Resources Code section 4292; (2) Public Resources Code Section 4293; (3) GO 95 Rule 35; and (4) the GO 95 Appendix E Guidelines to Rule 35. These standards require significantly increased clearances in the High Fire Threat District (HFTD), which do not apply to Roseville; however, REU’s goal is a more effective separation distance by increasing the trim around primary lines to 10-feet at the time of the trimming. Internal staff review has shown that this approach to high-voltage vegetation management in Roseville has historically proven beneficial in preventing the REU electric system from starting wildfires.
REU utilizes two overhead (aerial) voltage levels: 12kV and 60kV. Per GO95, Rule 35, Table 1, the radial clearance of bare line conductors from vegetation in an HFTD is 48 inches (18 inches for 12kV in non-HFTD). Roseville tree contractors exceed this separation distance by increasing the trim around primary lines to 10 feet in order to obtain a more effective clearance. This safety and reliability effort typically allows the REU tree crews enough time to return to the same location and trim again before the tree branches grow within the minimum allowable clearances.
Vegetation includes trees, brush, weeds, grass and other plants.
GO95, Rule 35, Table 1
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(H)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
32 Prepared by: J. Grace
GO95 Appendix E, Guidelines to Rule 35
Note: These are not regulatory clearance requirements that must always exist. Rather, they are initial pruning targets intended to help a utility remain compliant with the mandatory Rule 35 clearances until the next maintenance cycle.
Tree Pruning
REU utilizes industry-recognized vegetation management practices consistent with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 Tree Care Operations – Standard Practices for Tree Pruning, applicable California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) requirements, and relevant California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) regulations. All personnel, equipment, and tools used for vegetation management activities comply with the requirements established in ANSI Z133, Safety Requirements for Arboricultural Operations, which governs the pruning, trimming, maintenance, repair, and removal of trees and brush clearing activities.
REU typically contracts these services to qualified professional tree contractors.
Directional pruning methods are used to encourage trees to grow away from electric lines. Sometimes the situation requires pruning only one side of the tree, pruning one side more than the other, or pruning just the middle of the tree. These variations are known as side pruning, slope pruning or “V pruning.” Trees may appear unbalanced at first, but a healthy tree will cope with the changes, and its appearance will soften over time.
The primary pruning of deciduous trees is
typically during the dormant season. Damaged
trees, or those that constitute health or safety
hazards, are pruned at any time of the year as
required. All pruning cuts are usually made to
lateral branches. Clearing of vegetation around
poles and equipment is also performed.
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
33 Prepared by: J. Grace
Priority for Trimming
Routine tree-trimming priorities are based on the total number of customers potentially impacted due to a tree/vegetation event:
1. 60KV sub-transmission facilities,
2. 12KV distribution facilities,
3. 12KV distribution taps (down-stream of fuses).
Other priorities include:
1. Trees/Vegetation in contact with primary wire (Burners),
2. Trees/Vegetation within 18 inches of contact with primary conductor,
3. Trees/Vegetation within 10 feet of primary conductors and based on the growth rate of species,
4. Trees/Vegetation in contact with secondary conductors.
Firebreaks and Weed Abatement
REU firebreak clearances are utilized in open-space areas for structural protection of power poles. Firebreak clearances are applicable within an imaginary cylindroid space surrounding each pole on which a switch, fuse, transformer or lightning arrester is attached and surrounding each dead end or corner pole unless such pole is exempt from minimum clearance requirements by provisions of California Code of Regulations Title 14 CCR 1255 or PRC 4296. The radius of the cylindroid is 3.1 m (10 feet) measured horizontally from the outer circumference of the specified pole. Flammable vegetation and materials located wholly or partially within the firebreak space is treated as follows:
a) At ground level – remove flammable materials to bare mineral soil, including but not limited to, ground litter, duff and dead or desiccated vegetation that will allow fire to spread, and; b) From 0-2.4 m (0-8 feet) above ground level – remove flammable trash, debris or other materials, grass, herbaceous and brush vegetation. All limbs and foliage of living trees are removed up to a height of 2.4 m (8 feet).
c) From 2.4 m (8 feet) to horizontal plane of highest point of conductor attachment – remove dead, diseased or dying limbs and foliage from living sound trees and any dead, diseased or dying trees in their entirety.
To support fuel reduction efforts and maintain safe clearances in designated open-space areas, REU utilizes chemical vegetation management methods, as needed. Treatments around the base of utility poles in these areas include the application of pre-emergent and post-emergent herbicides to control both emerging and existing vegetation.
Chemical treatments are typically performed on a biennial basis at each location, with alternative vegetation control methods, such as string trimming (weed eating), utilized during the intervening year. These vegetation management activities are typically performed by a qualified contractor in accordance with applicable environmental, safety, and regulatory requirements. Following treatment, application records are submitted to REU for documentation and recordkeeping purposes.
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
34 Prepared by: J. Grace
Responsible Parties
REU relies on Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) in order to utilize their expertise to assist in Plan review and/or individual recommendations for specific Plan items. This includes consulting with the following City positions as needed:
• Roseville Fire Department, Fire Division Chief – position requires eight years of increasingly responsible experience in municipal fire suppression duties, including five years of supervisory responsibility at the Fire Captain level or higher.
• Roseville Urban Forester – requires three years of professional experience performing assessment and maintenance of trees in an urban environment, including one year of lead responsibility and training from an accredited college or university in urban forestry, biology, environmental science, ornamental horticulture or a related field.
• Park Planning and Development Superintendent – position requires training from an accredited college or university with major course work in landscape architecture, park planning, construction management.
REU personnel that manage and execute the electric utility Vegetation Program:
• Electric Utility Director, Chief Operating Officer and Assistant Electric Utility Director (Operations) – the Utility Director plans, organizes, directs and reviews the broad activities and operations of the Electric Department including distribution, generation, planning, retail and administrative services. This position coordinates assigned activities with other departments and outside agencies and provides highly responsible and complex administrative support to an Assistant City Manager. • Electric Operations Manager – the Operations Manager plans, organizes, directs, and coordinates the activities of electric distribution operations within the Electric Utility Department including installation, construction, operation and maintenance of the electric utility distribution system to include substations, warehousing, and metering; coordinates operation and maintenance activities with other sections, divisions, departments or outside agencies and utilities; and provides highly responsible technical support to the Assistant Electric Utility Director. Position requires five years of increasingly responsible experience in electrical systems construction, maintenance and repair work, including two years of supervisory responsibility.
• Electric Operations Supervisor – the Operations Supervisor plans, organizes, directs and supervises electric operations within the Electric Utility Department. The position may be assigned to one or more of the following electric utility operational areas: line construction and maintenance, troubleshooting, metering, dispatch, warehouse, vegetation management, or street lighting. This position requires three years of increasingly responsible experience in electric utility systems operations, construction, maintenance and repair work; including one year providing technical and functional supervision over assigned personnel.
• Tree-Trimming Contractors – most of REU’s tree pruning/vegetation management work is performed by an outside tree-trimming contractor but may be performed by REU crews as needed. The contractor work consists of furnishing all labor, supervision, training, methods, tools, fuel, disposal of brush/chips and equipment necessary to accomplish the vegetation management work. The contractor crew must be qualified and able to perform all high-voltage energized line clearance tree trimming work utilizing
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
35 Prepared by: J. Grace
an aerial device, such as a bucket truck, or by climbing. In addition to certified tree workers, the contractor must also employ a certified arborist.
The REU contractor typically patrols all City owned overhead power lines annually. Tree-trimming schedules are prioritized based on the level of corrective maintenance action needed. The contractor will also respond to service order requests and other maintenance work requiring tree/vegetation trimming or removal at the direction of REU management.
Work Review
Contractor trimming work includes the use of hand saws, pruners, pole saws, hand pruners, wood chippers, axes and wedges, and chain-saws. Most work is performed by a crew utilizing a variety of vehicles and equipment including bucket trucks and woodchippers. REU regularly reviews and inspects the equipment the contractor intends to use as well as the work performed. A supervisor provided by the contractor is required to perform safety inspections and perform training as needed to assure the safety of contractor’s personnel. All contractor trimming or pruning work near high voltage distribution and transmission lines are performed by a certified and qualified line clearance tree trimmer.
Record Keeping
A complete record of all tree work is maintained by the contractor and REU. Line clearance tree trimming records include the type of tree work performed, date, species, and location.
Property Owner Notification
Property owners are typically notified a minimum of 24 hours prior to trimming on private property. Door hangers are left at each location or with the occupant of the property. A “Letter of Understanding” must be signed by the property owner prior to removal of any tree (unless an emergency condition exists). Public notification may not be required for emergency call-out work.
Emergency Work
Emergency vegetation trimming/removal work is performed for the safety of the public, REU employees and the safety/reliability of the REU electric system. Emergency work may be performed by REU employees or outside contractors, or through Mutual Aid Agreements. Standard notifications may not be issued for emergency work depending on the severity of the issue.
Inspections
Roseville Electric Utility meets or exceeds the minimum inspection requirements provided in CPUC GO 165 and CPUC GO 95, Rule 18. Pursuant to these rules, utilities inspect electric facilities in the HFTD more frequently than the other areas of its service territory. As described above, Roseville Electric Utility currently does not have any overhead power lines located within or near the HFTD within the CPUC’s Fire-Threat Map. However, Roseville Electric Utility performs a detailed-type inspection within the City Wildfire Reduction Zone on an annual basis, as stated in the Wildfire Reduction Zone Inspection and Maintenance Program [5].
The inspection target is to be completed annually before the start of fire season each year. Intrusive-type inspections will be performed approximately every five-years as per the standard Distribution Inspection and Maintenance Program. The inspection process is unchanged during high-risk and red flag days.
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(I)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
36 Prepared by: J. Grace
Note: if Roseville Electric Utility employees find a facility that needs repair but is not owned by the Utility, REU will send the facility owner a notification (Safety Hazard Notification or SHN) so that the correct party can make the required repairs.
Undergrounding Policy
Roseville's development review, engineering, and utility design processes result in new residential and commercial developments being served by underground electric infrastructure. REU incorporates electric infrastructure design into project entitlements, civil improvement plan review, and utility construction approvals, making underground systems the standard for modern development within its service territory. This longstanding practice has materially reduced wildfire exposure by limiting the expansion of overhead distribution infrastructure as the community grows. Consequently, REU's overhead system is largely confined to legacy facilities, while most newer service areas are supplied by underground infrastructure.
Reclosing Policy
Roseville Electric Utility’s electric system does not currently have any distribution recloser equipment installed on electric supply circuits and thus, no policy is currently needed:
REU does not have 12kV reclosers located along distribution feeders. Reclosing operations are performed by feeder breakers located in REU’s substations. In most instances, the reclose function is set to operate once for underground feeders and twice for overhead feeders. In most cases, 60kV substation line breakers are set to reclose one time.
Engineering and operations management have reviewed the current system protection (reclose) philosophy and, considering our annual summer preparedness work, have determined there is no immediate apparent advantage to changing our approach to protection reclosing.
Note: Substation breakers are placed in “no-test” during maintenance procedures that necessitate that action.
Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS)
Protocols for de-energizing portions of the electrical system are selected according to the specific need, nature and severity of each incident. Because Roseville Electric Utility (REU) is not directly interconnected with investorowned utilities (IOUs), its customers are not subject to IOU-initiated Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) events.
Although REU has never needed to implement a PSPS within its service territory—and does not anticipate doing so—the utility maintains a comprehensive plan should load curtailment become necessary. In such a scenario, REU would invoke the emergency procedures detailed in various emergency plans, including activation of the City and Electric Department Emergency Operations Centers, execution of emergency communications and public-information protocols, coordination of mutual-assistance resources, and special consideration for critical and at-risk customers. REU may also be requested to cut power by emergency service providers including by firefighters to protect the safety of first responders.
Working alongside the City’s Police and Fire Departments, REU has also developed a service-restoration priority list that may be applied to guide any required load-shedding actions:
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(F)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
37 Prepared by: J. Grace
De-energization
Roseville Electric Utility has the authority to preemptively shut off power due to fire-threat conditions (i.e. a PSPS), however, this option will only be used in extraordinary circumstances. Upon confirmation of a planned fire-threat de-energization event, advance notice (as much as possible and/or practical) will be given to all Roseville customers, such as residences and businesses, through the communication tactics listed above.
Critical facilities and some key electric customers, such as Fire Departments, Law Enforcement and Hospitals, may be contacted directly to give as much notice as possible as to the planned de-energization of their electric service due to a fire-threat condition. REU will also work closely with other utility partners, BANC, CAISO, and public safety partners to minimize impacts to Roseville residents and REU customers.
Typical methods used for internal city communication of a major de-energization event may be through Dispatch (for example, Electric Dispatch to Police Dispatch), radio or cellular equipment. Should a major deenergization event occur due to a fire-threat, it is likely that the EOC will be activated and the Electric, Police and Fire Departments will be directly involved in the emergency process.
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(G)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
38 Prepared by: J. Grace
8. RESTORATION OF SERVICE
Electric Outage Restoration Procedure
REU has procedures for electric outage restoration [6]. The purpose of these procedures are to provide a consistent set of procedures for Electric System Dispatchers and field personnel to communicate, safely assess, isolate and restore power to areas affected by an unscheduled power outage. The same procedures apply after an electric outage event due to a wildfire.
This procedure classifies unscheduled outages in the following categories:
12kV Feeder – Laterals
12kV Feeder – Mainline
60/12kV Distribution Substation
230/60kV Receiving Station
Complete System Blackout
Steps are outlined for each outage category restoration effort. All overhead circuits will be inspected and cleared prior to re-energization per applicable regulations.
Outage Notification Procedure for Electric Dispatch
REU establishes broad power outage notification procedures [7] that is adhered to by all REU Electric System Dispatchers involved in the notification process for scheduled and unscheduled power outages. Notification procedures for REU Dispatchers and describes their role in the notification process for scheduled and unscheduled power outages during and after normal working hours are divided into the following categories:
Scheduled Power Outages
Unscheduled Power Outages – Non-Circuit/Normal Hours
Unscheduled Power Outages – Non-Circuit/After Hours
Unscheduled Power Outages – Circuit/VIP Normal Hours
Unscheduled Power Outages – Circuit/VIP After Hours
Priorities:
1. Physical safety of employees and the public
2. Integrity and reliability of the power system
3. Protection of equipment
4. Service to the customer
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(M)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
39 Prepared by: J. Grace
9. PLAN EVALUATION
Metrics for measuring plan performance
Roseville Electric Utility will track the following metrics.
Metric 1: Fire Ignitions
For purposes of this metric, a wildfire ignition is defined as follows:
A Roseville Electric Utility distribution asset was associated with the fire; The fire was self-propagating and of a material other than electrical and/or communication facilities; The resulting fire traveled greater than one linear meter from the ignition point; and, Roseville Electric Utility has knowledge that the fire occurred.
Metric 2: Wire Down
REU will track the number of distribution wire-down events occurring within its service territory. For purposes of this metric, a wire-down event includes any instance in which an electric primary distribution conductor falls to the ground or onto a foreign object. This metric will not be normalized to exclude unusual events, such as severe weather conditions. Instead, REU will supplement the metric with a qualitative description of any extraordinary circumstances that may have contributed to the event.
Metric 3: Completed WRZ Inspections
REU will track the percentage of scheduled inspections completed within the Wildfire Reduction Zone (WRZ).
The objective of this metric is to achieve 100 percent completion of all scheduled inspections within the established inspection cycle, ensuring wildfire prevention measures are consistently implemented in areas of elevated wildfire concern.
Metric 4: Completed FHSZ Inspections
REU will track the percentage of scheduled inspections completed within the Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ).
The objective of this metric is to achieve 100 percent completion of all scheduled inspections within the established inspection cycle, ensuring wildfire prevention measures are consistently implemented in areas of elevated wildfire concern.
Monitoring and Auditing the Plan
Review of the Wildfire Mitigation Plan will occur by REU staff annually, or as needed throughout the year. The annual review will include an assessment of this Plan’s associated programs and performance. This Plan will be presented publicly to City Council consistent with State mandates. Additionally, a qualified independent evaluator may present a report on this Plan to the City Council.
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(E) & (N)(I, II, III)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
40 Prepared by: J. Grace
Identifying and Correcting Deficiencies to the Plan
During any review of the Plan, the Electric Director, or his/her designee, has the authority to, and is responsible for, correcting deficiencies.
Monitoring the Effectiveness of Inspections
Roseville Electric Utility uses General Orders 95 (GO95), 128 (GO128) and 165 (GO165), respectively as its minimum guide to inspect its electric supply system. Field staff routinely inspect assets (typically based on an interval process) within the electric service territory and identify and perform corrective action as deficiencies are encountered. Inspections are recorded in our Computer Maintenance Management System and regularly monitored by REU management and our preventative data system technician.
For reactive maintenance that cannot be repaired upon discovery, a priority level is assigned and a subsequent work order is created. Work orders require personnel to input information, which establishes accountability for those charged with completing the order along the order processing continuum. REU tracks inspections and reactive maintenance in its CMMS and, in the interest of transparency, reports information to the CPUC annually.
REU staff meets regularly (typically monthly) to review electric outages. Several metrics, such as outage response times, fire ignition, wires down, and reliability indices, undergo review. In addition to the regular staff meetings, a report for any inspections left outstanding is typically run at least once a year.
Spot Checks for Inspection Effectiveness
In addition to scheduled inspections performed by field personnel, Roseville Electric Utility (REU) utilizes spotcheck procedures as a quality assurance measure to verify the effectiveness and consistency of its asset inspection program. Supervisors or designated staff periodically conduct random reviews of completed work orders or previously inspected assets and compare field conditions against documentation maintained in the CMMS and associated work records. This independent validation process helps ensure inspection standards are consistently applied, promotes accountability, and identifies potential training, documentation, or procedural deficiencies.
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
41 Prepared by: J. Grace
10. Key Wildfire-Mitigation Targets
Because the majority of REU’s electric system is underground and none of its facilities are located within California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Tier 2 or Tier 3 High Fire-Threat Districts, REU’s overall wildfire risk exposure is inherently low. Accordingly, mitigation efforts are focused on three key areas: (1) maintaining the safety and reliability of the limited overhead infrastructure, (2) preserving the City-designated Wildfire Reduction Zone (WRZ), and (3) ensuring that both contracted and in-housework consistently meets REU’s established standards.
Key Wildfire-Mitigation Targets
Program Category Activity / Project Completion Target Estimated Cost
1. Grid Design &
System Hardening
Maintain Cal Fire-approved “Fault
Tamer” expulsion-proof fusing on all
overhead transformers in WRZ
100% annually Included in Ops.
budget
2. Vegetation
Management
Trim all scheduled overhead circuits
to approx. 10-ft clearance at time of
trim; perform scheduled
firebreak/weed-abatement
treatments around poles in openspace areas
100% 3-year cycle $1.29M
(FY ‘26/’27) – Year 2
$1.34M
(FY ‘27/’28) – Year 3
3. Inspection &
Maintenance
Detailed annual inspection of all
scheduled overhead assets in the
FHSZ and WRZ
100% annually Included in Ops.
budget
4. Inspection &
Maintenance
Intrusive pole tests (5-yr cycle) 100% cycle due
annually
Included in Ops.
budget
5. QA/QC Protocol Perform spot-check of tree contractor work
5% spot-check
quarterly
Included in Ops.
budget
6. Workforce Training
& Capacity
Conduct WMP review training; certify
new hires on WMP procedures
100% annually /
100% for new
employees
Included in Ops.
budget
7. Emergency Ops Annual refresh of critical facility
contact list and de-energization
protocols
100% annually Included in Ops.
budget
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(D)
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
42 Prepared by: J. Grace
11. INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
Public Utilities Code section 8387(c) required Roseville Electric Utility to contract with a qualified independent evaluator with experience in assessing the safe operation of electrical infrastructure to review and assess the comprehensiveness of the initial Wildfire Mitigation Plan. The independent evaluator issued a report that was posted to the City’s website and presented to City Council at a public meeting to ensure best practices were implemented based on the risk assessment of the electric utility system.
12. WMP PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS
The typical process for Wildfire Mitigation Plan approval is as follows:
1. The WMP undergoes an internal review that includes associated policies, procedures and tasks associated with wildfire mitigation efforts, plans and procedures. The review may include senior operations personnel, administrative, compliance and government relations staff. Training needs are included in the review to ensure employees understand their role in maintaining compliance.
2. During the review process, new or additional wildfire mitigation items may be assessed and added or deleted to an electric operations budget or engineering rehabilitation budgets. These items are typically budgeted for the next fiscal year. Funding undergoes several approval processes, both internally in the Electric department – which requires Director approval - and then at the City level, which requires City Management approvals. When complete, the budget then moves to a public process at City Council, which reviews and authorizes the final approval. The financial budgeting process is publicly available to all Roseville customers. Should an unexpected and/or unbudgeted mitigation expense become necessary, the expense will typically be funded from an existing approved electric department budget.
3. Once staff has reviewed the Plan, an independent auditor may be chosen to make an impartial review of the Plan, policies and procedures as well as compliance with current regulations. Adjustments are made to the next version of the Plan during this process until the auditor and the City are satisfied that all statutes have been met. When ready, the Plan is posted on the City website and available in print for public review and comment. The final part of the process includes City Council approval for use.
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
43 Prepared by: J. Grace
13. REFERENCES
[1] REU, EOP 2.0, REU, EOP 2.0 Operations Standby Policy. [2] "National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admistration," [Online]. [3] "Californias Fourth Climate Change Assessment," [Online]. Available:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-07/Statewide%20Reports-%20SUMCCCA4-2018-013%20Statewide%20Summary%20Report.pdf. [4] "California Public Utilites Commission," [Online]. Available:
https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/firethreatmaps/.
[5] REU, EOP 1.07, REU, EOP 1.07 Wildfire Inspection and Maintenance Plan. [6] REU, SOP 6.01, REU, SOP 6.01 Electric Outage Restoration Procedures. [7] REU, SOP 6.02, REU, SOP 6.02 Outage Notification Procedures. [8] REU, SOP 6.02A, REU, SOP 6.02A External and Internal Outage Notification Procedures. [9] E. 1. D. I. a. M. P. REU.
[10] BANC, "Balancing Authority of Northern California," [Online]. Available:
http://www.thebanc.org/.
[11] WAPA. [Online]. Available: https://www.wapa.gov/About/Pages/about.aspx.
14. DOCUMENT REVISION
Year Document
Section Change Description
2025 All Modified document to include additional/clarifying language in various locations, including charts and graphs / Updated data to current numbers (customers, etc.)
2026 All Document updates including maps and charts / Updated data to current.
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
44 Prepared by: J. Grace
Appendix A – Average Temperatures and Wind Speeds in Roseville *data from: www.weatherspark.com
City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
45 Prepared by: J. Grace
---- END OF DOCUMENT ----
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.12
File #: 0203-07
Item ID: 2026-769
Title: Electric Generation Vapor Compressor – Sole Source Purchase Order Contact: Nathan Ribordy, Steve Hancock 916-746-1673, 916-774-5631 [email protected], [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a Sole Source Purchase Order with American Compressor Company in the amount of $341,314.92 to provide two (2) Howden Roots manufactured rotary lobe vapor compressors for onsite backup inventory replacing the prior backup inventory which are now in service. Funding is included in the Electric Department’s Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget in the Electric Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a sole source purchase order with American Compressor Company for two Howden Roots manufactured rotary lobe vapor compressors.
BACKGROUND
The Roseville Energy Park (REP) uses a Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) system to process waste streams and reduce liquid waste. Rotary lobe vapor compressors are used in the ZLD to increase the efficiency of the process. The ZLD vapor compressors are exposed to high chlorides content water, high temperatures and continuous service. These operating conditions cause erosion and other maintenance issues which staff contends with regularly. The current vapor compressors have been replaced with the backup stock of compressors. The requested vapor compressors will replace the backup stock which are now in use. This backup stock of compressors will be ready to install as needed without any extended wait times.
The rotary lobe vapor compressors that are installed are Howden Roots Model 1216 RGS. American Compressor Company is the sole factory authorized distributor of the vapor compressor model used in the REP Zero Liquid Discharge process. Because of this, staff recommends the approval of Sole Source purchase of two rotary lobe vapor compressors from American Compressor Company.
FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of services will not exceed $341,314.92. Funding is included in the Electric Department's Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget in the Electric Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)). The approval of this sole source purchase order with American Compressor Company meets this requirement and is not subject to CEQA. No additional CEQA review is necessary.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Nathan Ribordy, Power Generation Superintendent
Steve Hancock, Senior Electric Business Analyst
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Sole Source - American Compressor - Signed CAO
2. Quote
3. Sole Source Letter
REVIEWERS:
Steve Hancock, Electric Department - Financial & Administrative Created/Initiated - 8/26/2026 William Forsythe, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/26/2026 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/27/2026 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/27/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/3/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/3/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/7/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/8/2026
Quote
Date
7/29/2026
Quote #
CI6210QT
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
ROSEVILLE ENERGY PARK
5120 PHILLIP ROAD
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747-9116
(916) 746-1683
Rep
A.P.
EMAIL [email protected]
Total
Subtotal
Sales Tax (7.75%)
PHONE 916/ 746-1686 SARAH
ATTENTION
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. If you have any further questions, please contact me.
Tony Piraino
(562) 944-6188
Description Qty Each Total
Allen Varner / (916) 746-1652
UNIT 1216 RGS J STM V N PL 71 B L GE SCS LAG
FOB Factory, Estimated availability, 18-20 weeks, ARO
2 155,215.00 310,430.00T
INBOUND FREIGHT CHARGE 4,369.00 4,369.00T
OUTBOUND FREIGHT CHARGE 2,119.00 2,119.00
MFG Payment Schedule:
• 30% down with purchase order. (NET 30)
• 30% upon castings and forgings at MFG's Facility (NET 30) • 40% balance due upon delivery. (NET 30)
$341,314.92
$316,918.00
$24,396.92
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.13
File #: 0800-03
Item ID: 2026-766
Title: Renewable Energy Credits Power Purchase Agreement Contact: Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the attached Renewable Energy purchase through a long-term Power Purchase Agreement with Shell Energy North America, L.P. The annual cost of the power purchase agreement is $3,175,000. Future funding will be included in the Electric Department's future Electric Fund budgets and are subject to the approval of City Council. This recommendation has no impact on the General Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the attached 11-year Power Purchase Agreement for 100,000 renewable energy and credits per year with Shell Energy North America, L.P.
BACKGROUND
The State of California’s Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS) mandates that 60% of retail electricity sales come from renewable energy sources by 2030, and 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045.
It further mandates 65% of RPS procurement to be derived from long-term contracts of 10 or more years.
This long-term policy framework makes procurement of renewable energy and its associated Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) through 2037 consistent with the state’s clean energy goals. To support these requirements, Roseville Electric Utility has evaluated various offers from several counterparties. The agreement with Shell Energy North America, L.P. is an eleven-year purchase of Category 1 (PCC1) renewable energy from qualifying renewables facilities located in California. Under this agreement, Roseville will receive 100,000 RECs annually at a fixed price of $31.75 per REC, with deliveries scheduled from 2027 through 2037. This contract will cover approximately 9% of Roseville’s annual PCC1 REC requirement. Payment is due only after the PCC1 RECs have been transferred to and accepted by Roseville.
FISCAL IMPACT
The annual cost of the contract is $3,175,000 for delivered energy and RECs. Future funding will be included in the Electric Department’s future Electric Fund budgets and is subject to the approval of City Council. This recommendation has no impact on the General Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
Approval of this contract meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Petra Wallace, Power Supply and Portfolio Administrator Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-348
2. Purchase Agreement
REVIEWERS:
Petra Wallace, Electric Department - Resource Planning & Generation Created/Initiated - 8/26/2026 William Forsythe, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/26/2026 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/27/2026 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/27/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/3/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/3/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/7/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/8/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-348
APPROVING A POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US), L.P. AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, California’s Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) mandates that 60% of retail electricity sales come from renewable sources by 2030, and 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045; and
WHEREAS, it further mandates 65% of RPS procurement to be derived from long-term contracts of 10 years or more; and
WHEREAS, to support these requirements, staff is recommending the City enter into an 11-year Power Purchase Agreement for the procurement of Renewable Energy Credits which is consistent with the State’s clean energy goals; and
WHEREAS, a Power Purchase Agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Shell Energy North America (US), L.P., has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
!"#"
$%&'
()
*(+,-%..,
/0122
341567
895:0
;<15=>?
@A/BC
DEFE
GHIJKLMJ
NOP
GHIJKLMJ
NOP
OQLR
SLTQKP
UQJKL
VLRRLMQ
OQLR
SLTQKP
GHWKJIQX
YIZQK[HI\
]QRRX
^JHTQ[
U_HIQP
`
abccdbee
f
U_HIQP
gccbefdbhd`
ijLkRP
lHmQK[WllRXnKH[QokRRQpMLpW[
ijLkRP
^iqYbGHIrkKjLJkHI[bUHmQKn[_QRRpMHj
st;8/;usvw8
uw8xvty;svw8
D946
s15<
x=5<
t141z?{21
341567
|}~
/?21
_k[
KLI[LMJkHI
GHIrkKjLJkHI
J_k[
GHIrkKjLJkHI
k[
QIJQKQZ
kIJH
irrQMJkoQ
OLJQ
X
LIZ
QJmQQI
u=:7
9
t91=221C
u?2=954=?C
L
ZWRX
M_LKJQKQZ
MkJX
WIZQK
J_Q
RLm[
Hr
J_Q
^JLJQ
Hr
GLRkrHKIkL
m_kM_
HmI[
LIZ
HlQKLJQ[
L
jWIkMklLR
QRQMJKkM
WJkRkJX
[X[JQj
QILQZ
kI
J_Q
QIQKLJkHI
JKLI[jk[[kHI
Zk[JKkWJkHI
lWKM_L[Q
LIZ
[LRQ
Hr
QRQMJKkM
lHmQK
LIZ
QIQKX
LJ
m_HRQ[LRQ
LIZ
KQJLkR
H[QokRRQ
WXQK
LIZ
/0122
341567
895:0
;<15=>?
@A/BC
DEFE
^_QRR
iIQKX
^QRRQK
QLM_
KQrQKKQZ
JH
_QKQkI
kIZkokZWLRRX
L[
L
ULKJX
LIZ
MHRRQMJkoQRX
L[
J_Q
ULKJkQ[
KQLKZkI
J_Q
lWKM_L[Q
LIZ
[LRQ
Hr
J_Q
UKHZWMJ
L[
ZQrkIQZ
QRHm
WIZQK
J_Q
JQKj[
LIZ
MHIZkJkHI[
_QKQkIp
GLlkJLRkQZ
JQKj[
W[QZ
kI
J_k[
GHIrkKjLJkHI
LIZ
IHJ
ZQrkIQZ
_QKQkI
_LoQ
J_Q
jQLIkI
L[[kIQZ
J_QKQJH
kI
J_Q
SL[JQK
YKQQjQIJ
HK
^M_QZWRQ
QLM_
L[
ZQrkIQZ
QRHmp
_Q
SL[JQK
YKQQjQIJ
LIZ
J_k[
¡
¢¡¢£¡¤
¡¡¡¥
¡¡
¡
YKQQjQIJ¦
§¨©©¨ª«
^_QRR
iIQKX
¬®¨ª«
GkJX
Hr
H[QokRRQ
Vi¯N^
YMMHWIJ
°HRZQK
qLjQP
GkJX
Hr
H[QokRRQ
±KLIkLJkHI
NOP
Y²f
³´µ¶¨ª
·¸ª¨¨¹¨º¶«
_k[
GHIrkKjLJkHI
[_LRR
Q
HoQKIQZ
X
J_Q
V^UU
YKQQjQIJ
oQK[kHI
ZLJQZ
QrrQMJkoQ
±MJHQK
²
hfhe
lKHjWRLJQZ
X
V^UU
NIMp
LIZ
J_Q
V^UU
»¼¡¡¡
¡¥
½¾¿¿
»¥¥¡¥¾
G^Y
ZLJQZ
±MJHQK
a
hf
f
L[
LjQIZQZ
rKHj
JkjQ
JH
JkjQ
MHRRQMJkoQRX
¡
SL[JQK
YKQQjQIJÀ
¾¢
JQKj[
LIZ
MHIZkJkHI[
LKQ
kIMHKlHKLJQZ
X
KQrQKQIMQ
L[
kr
rWRRX
[QJ
rHKJ_
kI
J_k[
GHIrkKjLJkHI
kIMRWZkI
WJ
IHJ
¡¥
½¢¡¥¾¡
Á
¡
¡
»¼¡¡¡
^M_QZWRQ
¦
á
¡
»¼¡¡¡À
kIMRWZkI
^M_QZWRQ
LIZ
J_Q
G^Y
[_LRR
HoQKI
J_k[
iG
KLI[LMJkHI
QÄMQlJ
L[
jHZkrkQZ
kI
J_k[
¦
Á¡¡¡¢¡
¡¡
¡¢
½¢¡¥¾¡
Á
¿¿¡À
¡Å¿¡À
½¡¢
Áb
ƦǦȦ
Á¡¡¡¢¡
½¢¡¥¾¡
Á
Á¡¡É ¡
Ê¡¼¤
Ë¢¤
¡
¡¿¡¡¥
¡QKQIMQ[
JH
L
UKHÌQMJ
L[
ZQrkIQZ
QRHm
kI
J_k[
GHIrkKjLJkHIp
ͪÎÏж«
»
¾¡¥
¡¡À
Ñ¥¾¢
jQLI
ÒkKj
WIZRQZ
iG[
L[
ZQrkIQZ
kI
^QMJkHI
bhp²ph
Hr
^M_QZWRQ
MHI[k[JkI
Hr
QIQKX
lKHZWMQZ
_HWKRX
X
HIQ
HK
jHKQ
UKHÌQMJ[
J_LJ
k[
[kjWRJLIQHW[RX
WIZRQZ
mkJ_
¡
Á¡¡É ¡
Ê¡¼¤
¡¥
iG[
¼¡¡¡¥
¡¡À
É¢
Ó¾¡
Ñ
GHIJQIJ
¡¼¤
Ô
UGG
¾¡
¥¡¡¥
¡ÉÀ
Õ¼
á
Ñ¢¾¡¡
¾¡
ZQrkIQZ
QRHm
LIZ
kkk
jQQJ[
J_Q
MKkJQKkL
Hr
^QMJkHI
²hfdZhhpkk
Hr
kJRQ
hf
G_LlJQK
²
Hr
J_Q
iIrHKMQjQIJ
UKHMQZWKQ[
rHK
J_Q
QIQmLRQ[
UHKJrHRkH
^JLIZLKZ
rHK
ÖHMLR
UWRkMRX
±mIQZ
iRQMJKkM
×JkRkJkQ[
L[
LZHlJQZ
X
J_Q
GLRkrHKIkL
iIQKX
GHjjk[[kHI
HI
OQMQjQK
hh
hfhf
J_LJ
JHHT
QrrQMJ
ØWRX
h
hfh
¡
GiG
Ê¢¡¡
Ñ¢¡¥¾¡p
ÙºÚ۪κ¹¨º¶´©
·¶¶ªÛܶ¨µ«
_Q
HIRX
iIokKHIjQIJLR
YJJKkWJQ[
MHIoQXQZ
WIZQK
J_k[
GHIrkKjLJkHI
L[
lLKJ
Hr
J_Q
UKHZWMJ
LKQ
UKHKLj
YJJKkWJQ[
L[
ZQ[MKkQZ
kI
^QMJkHI
hpdph
Hr
^M_QZWRQ
WIZQK
J_Q
YllRkMLRQ
UKHKLj
m_kM_
rHK
lWKlH[Q[
Hr
J_k[
GHIrkKjLJkHI
k[
J_Q
GLRkrHKIkL
QIQmLRQ[
UHKJrHRkH
^JLIZLKZ
L[
ZQrkIQZ
kI
J_Q
OQrkIkJkHI[
[QMJkHI
_QKQHrp
ͪÎݨж޵߫
»
¾¡¥
¡¡
Ñà¡¢
¡
¤
¢¤
Ó¾¤¼
ÊÁÁ
¥¡¡¥
½¿¡¢
Ñ£
Y
QRHmp
áâãäåæçè
éèêëìâíë
îáï
ðñòóôõö÷ó÷ôö÷ôðõòóáéðòõ
!"
#$%
&'(
)*+,(
-.*
(/,'
01'
.-
2*.34,5
3(6+7(*(3
5. 849(*
:5'(
;<=>?!@?
AB@
CD
+E
FG"HI
JK$"
LM<N
OPQ
?
B@
R=
M>
S
T
OBU
T
!?
?
V
OBU
A=B>?
T
?
WB>
T
B>
!@@=T!>@
XB?
?
=@
TP
Q
!>T
PO
Q
=R
?
<!OBR=>B!
YZ["
\$]^$
_$`%
<=WW
>@B>S
a!>P!
H
?
=PS
V
@
Wb
G
GHc
=UBT
T
?
!?
?
LM<Q
!??BbP?!bO
?=
?
M>
S
S
>
!?
T
TPB>S
?
V
OBU
d
W
bP?
@
!?
T
!R?
?
V
OBU
d
W
Q
!OO
b
?!>QR
T
?=
!>T
!BT
R=
b
eP
B>
!@@=T!>@
XB?
?
?
WQ
=R
?
BQ
<=>RBW!?B=>"
\$]^$
#
%
<fYZ[
gh$i]j%
Z
OO
XBOO
R=W
!OO
Q@
TPOB>S
!>T
?!SSB>S
kPB
W
>?Q
!Q
W!
b
!
OB@!bO
?=
?
?!>Q!@?B=>JQN
@=>?
W
O!?
T
P>T
?
BQ
<=>RBW!?B=>"
d
Q
Q
UB@
Q
Q
!OO
b
R=W
T
@=>QBQ?
>?
XB?
!OO
!
OB@!bO
<fYZ[
!>T
M<<
U!BOB>S
=?=@=OQ"
YR
!
OB@!bO
Z
OO
Q
!OO
b
?
O
@?B@B?
BW
=?
R=
P
=Q
Q
=R
<!OBR=>B!
lO=b!O
!WB>S
Z=OP?B=>Q
f@?
!>T
!QQ=@B!?
T
<!
!>T
d!T
L
SPO!?B=>Q
R=
?
<!OBR=>B!
<!
=>
l
>
=PQ
l!Q
MWBQQB=>Q
!>T
!m
?ne!Q
T
<=W
OB!>@
@
!>BQWQ"
op
_qr$%
Z
OO
Q
!OO
T
OBU
?
A=TP@?
b
?!>QR
B>S
?
LM<Q
P@
!Q
T
!>T
Q=OT
P>T
J?
=PS
LMlYZN
5. 849(*sE
1tuvwx
/,,.4y5
>=
O!?
?
!>
!
Q?
=R
?
!
R=OO=XB>S
?
!
B>
X
B@
?
M>
S
?=
X
B@
QP@
LM<Q
!
!??BbP?!bO
X!Q
S
>
!?
T"
g$]$`$q
i
#`$%
Z
OO
Q
!OO
T
OBU
?
A=TP@?
b
JBN
T
OBU
B>S
M>
S
?=
?
<!OBR=>B!
YZ[
=>
b
!OR
=R
eP
!?
?
V
OBU
A=B>?
B>
!@@=T!>@
XB?
?
<!OBR=>B!
YZ[
kPB
W
>?Q
!>T
=@
TP
Q
!>T
JBBN
?!>QR
B>S
?
LM<Q
XB?
!QQ=@B!?
T
zML<
n&/{E
:+-
/y9D
5'*.4{'
1tuvwx|
5. 849(*sE
:.*
849(*sE
}(E+{y((sED
3(E+{y/5(3
1tuvwx
/,,.4y5:ED~
/6+-.*y+/
wx
E'/66
)/9
x(66(*
3+*(,569
-.*
5'(
M>
S
=?B=>
=R
?
A=TP@?
B>
!@@=T!>@
XB?
?
<!OBR=>B!
YZ[
kPB
W
>?Q
!>T
=@
TP
Q
!>T
eP
Q
!OO
>=?
b
kPB
T
?=
!
!>
!TTB?B=>!O
!W=P>?
?=
Z
OO
B>
Q
@?
=R
QP@
M>
S "
eP
Q
!OO
!
?
LM<
!W=P>?
=R
?
<=>?!@?
AB@
Q
@BRB
T
!b=U
?=
Z
OO
>=
O!?
?
!>
?
>
JN
3/9E
-.66.+y{
*(,(+)5
.-
x(66(*sE
+y7.+,(
E4E(4(y5
5. 5'(
5*/yE-(*
.-
5'(
tuEc
=UBT
T
?
!?
BR
eP
TBQ
P?
Q
!>
=?B=>
=R
QP@
B>U=B@
B>
S==T
R!B?
eP
Q
!OO
!
?
P>TBQ
P?
T
=?B=>
XB?
B>
QP@
nT!
B=T
!>T
=UBT
Z
OO
XB?
XB??
>
>=?B@
Q
@BR B>S
?
b!QBQ
R=
?
TBQ
P?
T
!W=P>?"
eP
Q
!OO
!U
>=
=bOBS!?B=>
?=
W!m
! W
>?
?=
Z
OO
R=
LM<Q
P>?BO
QP@
LM<Q
!U
b
>
?!>QR
T
?=
eP
Q
LMlYZ
!@@=P>?"
#
i
\$]^$
$$
&'(
;2*.34,5
}(6+7(*9
v4/*/y5((C
4y3(*
5'+E
.y-+*/5+.y
E'/66
(
{.7(*y(3
9
5'(
R=OO=XB>S
J!N
V
OBU
Z
=?R!OO"
f>
=?B=>
=R
?
<=>?!@?
P!>?B?
>=?
?!>QR
T
?=
eP
Q
LMlYZ
!@@=P>?
b
!
=R
?
BWW
TB!?
O
R=OO=XB>S
@!O
>T!
!
Q
!OO
@=>Q?B?P?
!
V
OBU
Z
=?R!OOC"
JbN
L
W
TB
Q"
=>
!
V
OBU
Z
=?R!OO
Z
OO
Q
!OO
XB?
B>
RBR?
>
JIN
ePQB>
QQ
V! Q
!?
eP
Q
O
@?B=>
B?
JBN
T
OBU
?=
eP
O!@
W
>?
A<<
LM<Q
=R
?
Q!W
B>?!S
!
W
?B>S
!OO
kPB
W
>?Q
=R
?
BQ
<=>RBW!?B=>
+y,643+y{
5'(
;2*.(,5EC
E(,5+.y
(6.|
!?
>=
!TTB?B=>!O
@=Q?
?=
eP
c
=
JBBN
!
eP
?
=QB?BU
TBRR
>@
b
?X
>
?
W!m
?
B@
R=
@=W
!!bO
A<<
dL
LM<Q
!Q
T
?
WB>
T
b
eP
!@?B>S
B>
!
@=WW
@B!OO
!Q=>!bO
W!>>
!>T
?
<=>?!@?
AB@
WPO?B
OB
T
b
?
V
OBU
Z
=?R!OO
kP!>?B? "
fOO
!W=P>?Q
P>T
?
BQ
Z
@?B=>
@=>Q?B?P?
TB
@?
T!W!S
Q
>=?
QPb
@?
?=
!>
OBWB?!?B=>
=R
T!W!S
Q
=UBQB=>
B>
=
B>
?
!Q?
fS
W
>?"
J@N
MU
>?
=R
V
R!PO?"
!BOP
?=
@P
!
V
OBU
Z
=?R!OO
?
=PS
B?
?
W
TB
Q
Q
@BRB
T
P>T
JbNJBN
=
JbNJBBN
!b=U
XB?
B>
?
B?
JGN
T! Q
=R
?
!
OB@!bO
T
OBU
T
!TOB>
Q
!OO
@=>Q?B?P?
!>
MU
>?
=R
V
R!PO?
P>T
Z
@?B=>
=R
?
!Q?
fS
W
>?
>?B?OB>S
eP
?=
@BQ
!OO
BS
?Q
!>T
W
TB
Q
!U!BO!bO
?
P>T
c
=UBT
T
?
!?
BR
Z
OO
BQ
TBOBS
>?O
PQPB>S
@P
!>T
=UBT
Q
eP
XB?
XB??
>
>=?B@
XB?
B>
QP@
GnT!
B=T
T
Q@BbB>S
?
Q?
Q
b
B>S
?!m
>
QP@
@P
B=T
Q
!OO
b
?
>T
T
b
!>
!TTB?B=>!O
?
B?
JGN
T! Q"
e
B>@OPTB>S
XB?
B>
?
BQ
<=>RBW!?B=>
!
=UBQB=>
R=
¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©¤ªª¨©¥§«¨©¥¬¡©®®¦£¤¡£®¦
!!
"#
$
%&#
!&
'
$
(
&
"
#
)
*
*
#
!
&
+!
,
-./012345
6
&
+!
&
&&
++
7)+&
&
!
!
8&
#
9
::,
;<
=<
=
+
>&
+$
&
&
)%
?
,
@ABCDE
FC
GECEHBIFCD
JBKFLFIMN
9
!
!
!
!
$
&
&$
!
8&
!
)%
?
*#
(
"
"
&
<
O=
&&&
&
&
7)+
!
"
&
&
8P
*
&
8
&
<=
Q
+)+
&
)#
7"
)#
7&$
<=
"
9
&
8
9
"
!
#
&&
<
O=
&
&$
<=
!
++
R#
6!
!
Q!&
**
&
+!
$
#
&
"
9
SOT<=<S=
+)+
)!
&,
U
7)+&
!
"
&
&
8
&
&
(V&
W7)X9
(
&
*
"
**
$
&
**
&
" ,
YZ[[\]^_`a
b`c\]de^_\`
e`f
ge^e
hi[\]^jk
9
"
*
!
l
&
&
&&
!*
"
*#
Q!&
Q&
9&
SOm<=<S=<n=o<p=
+)+
)!
&$
%
&
qr
stu
vuwwuxyz
{|zzuzzq|r
|x
xu}z|r}~w
|~s}qr}~wu
~
stu
vuwwux
CIALM
@
ELFEHM
EHI
W
!
$
9
&
*
7)+
7*
#
"#
6
Q
7)+&
#
!
<
W =P
9
"
&
!!
&
&
*
p
#
8
<
W =$
*
!
*8
#
7)+&
%
&
&
&
!
*8
"$
& #
$
*
!
#
*&
!
*
,
X
&
&
*
8
*
!
*8$
*
*&
!$
&
&
!
&
*
&
!*
*
&
"
&*
&
$
*
&
#
9
"
*
(
"
vuwwuxyz
{x|{|xsq|r}w
*!
Q
&
&**#
!
&
&&
&
yz
{~wqztu
{x|
}s}
}ww}s
**
&
#
*P
6
**
#
!
7)+P
tu
}su
|
sx}rzux
qrs|
uxyz
v
|rs
?
!o&
!*
*
9
&
?#!
&
*
+
>&
6!
<>6+=,
9
&
!*
"
*
*#
Q!&
&
&
&&
+
)#
+!!&&
+
>&
+!!&&
#
6!,
X
#
&
!
9
(
#
&
!
8<&=
!
&
&
+
$
"
!
$
9
&
*
(
&&#
!
$
#
&&
&$
!
&
!
&
$
#
!
7)+&
(
&
+!
,
e`ai
_`
e
]\_j_\`jk
6
7)+
6
&
&
+!
&
7#
+#
&
9
7o
,S,S<
=
9
7,
X
¡¢£¤¥¦
§¦¨©ª «©
¬
®¯°±²³´µ¶±··µ¶²´¸µ¶²¹º®¶»»³°±§®°»³º
!!
""
"
#
"
$"
%
!"
#
"
$
"
#
"
$"
&'(&)*+),*--.
&,/,-*0
10230*/
45*67
28 )75
820532,+39
*
:;'665&&20
<0230*/=>9
20
$"
?
?
@
!!
&'(&)*+),*--.
&,/,-*0
102A'6)9
20 )75
-,B5
4)75
820532,+3
*
:;'665&&20
<CCD
<02A'6)=>9
20
E FG50/
<026'05/5+)
05H',05/5+)&
*&
102/'-3*)5A
,+
)75
CICJ&
K53'-*),2+&
!
$
L $!
!
$
#
"
$"
$
E!"
"
!"
M#
L"!
!
N
"
O!
PP%
PQPQ
R
$$!
S
"
TP%
PQPT%
!!
""
"
!
05H',05/5+)
4)75
820532,+3
*
:
!!
EU
!=>
!!
%
!!
??T
!%
V
!!
EU
!
$
$
!
""
@
W"
!
!
$
!
!
%
%
W%
!
!
"
$
$
""
X
&7*--
(5
A55/5A
:;'665&&20
<02A'6)=Y
G75
<*0),5&
Z,--
,+
322A
8*,)7
*/5+A
)75
)50/&
28 )7,&
? $
""
!"
#
@
$
"
W
$
!
!!
!
X
!
!!
%
!!
??T
!%
V
!!
EU
!
$$!
$
? $
[
W
%
#W%
""
#
""
R
!!
""
"
!
@
"
$
!
$
!!
%
!!
??T
!%
!!
EU
!
#
""
@
!
62&)&
,+
5\65&&
28 *+
*33053*)5
*/2'+)
5H'*-
)2
]D9^^^9^^^
4)75
:?"
!
?=>
,+
!"
#
!!
%
!!
EU
!
!!
??T
!%
!""!
W"_
`$%
$
""
R
!!
""
"
$$
?"
!
?%
!
a!
"
@
"
$
!!
%
!!
??T
!%
!!
EU
!%
""
""
W
"
!
!
W
?"
!
?
@
"
$
$
!!
%
!!
??T
!%
!!
EU
!
"
#
X
b
#
W"_
`$
$
$
%
!
a!
"
@
"
$
!!
!%
""
W
? $
#
c
dQ
$
!
W _
"
LW
$
O$
"
""
W
!!
!
%
""
"
"
$
!
$
!
"
_
`
W
@
"
$
!
@
$
%
@
$
$"
?
?
T%
@
$
E
U
!
! %
""
""
R
!!
""
"
!
@
"
$
!
@
$
%
@
$
$"
?
?
T%
@
$
E
U
!
#
""
@
!
!
c!
$
?"
!
?
!"
#
@
$
$"
?
?
T%
@
$
E
U
!
%
!""!
W"_
`$%
$
""
R
!!
""
"
$$
?"
!
?%
!
a!
"
@
"
$
%
@
$
$"
?
?
T%
@
$
E
U
!
%
""
X
""
W
"
!
!
W
?"
!
?
@
"
$
$
%
@
$
$"
?
?
T%
@
$
E
U
!
_
`$
$
$
%
!
a!
"
@
"
$
%
??T
E
U
!
%
? $
#
c
dQ
$
!
W _
"
LW
$
O$
"
""
W
!!
!
%
""
"
"
$
!
$
!
"
_
U
$
""
"
W
""
$
"
R
!!
""
"
$$
@
"
$
!
a!
$
$"
?
T_
e#
!
!
%
""
""
"
c!
!
"
""
$
$
"
R
!!
""
"
!
!
!!
""
"
?"
!
?
?"
!
fghijklm
nmopqgrp
sft
uvwxyz{|}x~~|}y{|}yu}zwxfnuwz
!
"
#
"
$
"
#
"
"
%
"
#
"
&
'(
(
"
")
$""
""
(
$
"
$""
*
+
,
"
-./0
,
"
"
(
"
((
""
"
1
$""
("
!
"
#
"
$
"
%
&
'(
(
"
"
,
""
(
"
+
*
"
$""2
(
)
3
-./04
+
""
*
*
,
$""2
(
*
,
$"")
5
+
("
$""2
(
""
(
(
"*
$""
""
(
"
"
*
"*
"*
,
"
*
6 ()
789:;<=>?@
A<BC
DEFG
$""
,
+
"
(
"
(
"",
"
#
(H
-
0
(
"
I
JI
*
*
(
K
-
0
,
I
JI
(
"
(
I
(
+
"4
(
*
"
$""
+
(
"
5$LK
-
0
"
"
"
J,
"
"
$
4"
"
"
(
(
IJJ
"
"
"
"
,
"
(
"
"
"
"
(
K
-
*0
'
(
,
""
"
"
#
(
M&
'(
(N
OPQRP
STUVW
UXX
YZY
[T\]Q[TSTV^W
_`[
a[`R][TSTV^
`_
ZbbW
"
"
(
$
.c/d-0-c0-+0-c)0
I
I(
efghijk
flmnieimoep
jq
orsturvwxwyz{|
e}ysvy~v
|~
ysv
hrsvw}wrs
-%0
I"
"
H
$""
"
"
,
3"
*
'(
6 (
H
-
0
!
#
"
RT[^Q_QT
^PT
YZY
UW
UV
ZXQ
QXT
bTVTOUXT
ZVT[
bTW`][RT
MZbbN
UW
W]RP
(
"
"
$
.)%c
$
.)%K
QQ
^PT
[`TR^W
"
*
+
#
"
#
(
"
J,
"
"
$
)
'
"
,
6 (
,
(
""
"
(
"
""
I*
3
"
$""
((
""
"
("
,
"
,)
eh
orsturvwxwyz{|q
er~|p
qtt
j}}y|s}
jq
qtt
-c0
6"
"
&
,)
*
&
,)
'
6 (
""
*
(
,
"
,
"
,
"
"
"
,)
'
"
(
,
*
*
!
"
,
"
,
6 ()
eh
orsturvwxwyz{|q
er~|p
qtt
j}}y|s}
j
qttq
¡¢£¤¥¦§¨
©¨ª«¬¢«
®¡¯
°±²³´µ¶·¸³¹¹·¸´¶º·¸´»¼°¸½½µ²³¡©°²½µ¼
!"
#
$
%% &$
!
'&&$
%!
!
!(!
!('
('!
!(
) *
+
!(
,
+!
!(
& !
!
!
-'
&+
!
!(
!
!! '!
.'
&+% &
!(
!(
/!
#!$
!
!(
/' &
0! !
++
)&
123123142$
+
+
'.'!
&
!(
/' &
0! !
++
'.'!
! 5
!(
6!!
&(
&&'
!
6&'!
!(
,
+!
!(!
&'
!(
%!!
!
!
+!
+
$
!
(
!
*!
)'!
#
(
'
&++&
!
!
&+%
!(
'&(
&(
5
789:
;<:=>?
@AB=CADEFEGHIJK
LK>>=M>=MNOP
Q
&R
STU#"
#
!
!(!
&
!%
!
!(
!
!
!
-'
!
!&R
!(
S!
T!
U+!
#
!+
!R
%
!
!(
!
*
'
!(
&!&!5
789:
;<:=N?
@AB=CADEFEGHIJK
LK>>=M>=MNOP
VK
WDDEXEABGI
9JYZ[
GBD
:ABDEXEAB[
\
#
%!!
S! "
#
%!
!
!(
$
'
( &(
)'!
/!
'
#&!
]
!(
^!
,
+!
!
(*
+
&&'!
%!!
!
(
'&(
'
!
&'
!(
*
_
-'
)
!
!!
! &
!(
!
!(
)'!
/!
(
&! !'!
*!
)'!""
5 #
(
!
!(
/'&!
!
!
!
-'
!
!(
%!
$
(
!
'&(
!! '!
6&' *
!
-'
5
#
(
!
+R$
+%
$
!
* +!
& +
!
!(
$
(
+*
6 !
!!+!
'
!
&! '
(!
!
!(
$
(
&+%
!(
%% &
%
+
'5
5 #
(
*
!(
/'&!
&
!(
&'+&`
5 #
*
!
-'
& !
!
!(
/a&!
%''!
!
!(
+!
&+% &
!(
%% &
.' +!
b
+
/&'+!
&'
$
'!
!
+ !
!$
#&!
41Q
4
-
45
!(
&+!
/&'5
(
/'&!
'%%
!
-'
'
!(
& +!
'&
+
!(!
'
&!&!
!(
#
!+
\1
+
!(
+'
+
!(
!
6&'!
!(
+! $
!(
+!
!(
'!
.' +!
%&
#&!
41Q
4
-
45
!(
&+!
/&'
!(
/!
#!
b&
/' &
c
&! &
0! ! $
%!
!(
++
)&+
44$
4141
!(!
!R
&!
d'
\4$
414\`
&
!(
&+%!
!(
/'&!
%'&
/a&!
%'&(
#
!
-'
('
!
#
&R
!
!(
/a&!
/a&!
`
!(
/'&!
+!
!(
.' +!
!
!(
/' &
0! !
e
ff5\
\
,
!(
/#
&+% &
.' +!
/!
!!
!
\
+
& !!
!(
#&!
41
!(
/#
&+!
'!
/' &
c
&! &
0! ! $
%!
!(
++
)&+
44$
4141
!(!
!R
&!
d'
\4$
414\5
4
-'
%!!
S! 5
-'
%!
!
!(!
-'
(
!R
&
!%
!
! (
STU#
&&'!
!
& !!
!(
!
!
+
#
!
-'
%
!
!(
!
*
'
!(
+! 5
'!
5 (
/!
!
!(
!$
!+
& !
* &
%&
!(
+!
!
+
6
!('
('!
!(
+
!(
+!
&(
'
&!
!(!
'
a'!
&(
!
'
! !
&!
* &
% & %5
g !(
/!
(
' !
R
!
!
+
h
&(
!(
!$
&(
$
& &! $
!(
!+
& !
!(
+! $
! !(!
'.'!
&(
%% &
$
!
&!
* &
+R!
& !
!(!
+
&&'5
Q
h
!&!5
(
+!
&! !'!
&
&++ !
( %+!
*
!(!
ijk
lmniokp
oqikqr
is
tk
ljupovmwwu
pkiiwkr
mqr
op
kxvwyrkr
zns{
ijk
ikn{
|p}ml~
mp
rkzoqkr
oq
ijk
s{{sroiu
xvjmqk
vi
'
]
05#5
5 e
\
Q]
++ !
h'!'
++
#&' !
6&(
++
'!
'
!
\]
!(
h
'!
/!
\
!
\]
!(
h
'!
/!
4 1$
4Q1$
4Q\$
%&! *
5
!
"#$
%!
&'
(
!
!
!)
*+,-.-/,+
0122+30-4,
+56-678
459
45 *+,-.-/,+
01563406
:436-0-:4568
;-6<-5
6<+
2+45-5.
1=
>5-6+9
?646+@
A12219-67
BC0<45.+
D%
EEF
FF
F
FG$
%H'$
!
"%
!
I
IJ%
H
I'
!
&
KL
MNOPQNOPRS
TU
TVO
WXSROY
MZYOONOPR[
MQQ\R\UPX]
^YU_\S\UPS
F
`
"!
`(
`
#
$
$
!(
#
`
a%
b
`
!
D #)
c
'
-@
42+59+9
/7
499-5.
*13
6<+
d3-947
4=6+3
6<+
>5-6+9
?646+@
e<[email protected].
<1,-9478
/+=13+
6<+
:+3-19
46 6<+
+59
`
!
`
%
*hH#
i'8
13 *A-678
!
#
#%'$
%'$
H#
I
$
I%
(
!'$
I%
'
%$
J
%
%'$
!
#
%
I
H
I%
'
`
!
j
a$
#
a
'
%#I
!`
k433456-+@
-@
42+59+9
/7
3+:,40-5.
6<+
;139
*A?l8
;-6<
6<+
;139
*m4@6+3
l.3++2+568
! !
!
'
`
!
`
G
j%I
n%
a%
Fo$
j%I
n%$
`
!
D #
#
`
`
!
p`#
I')
-5@+36-5.
*qBA@
138
/+=13+
+40<
4::+43450+
1=
6<+
:<34@+
*04:40-67
459r13
+5+3.78s
I
9+,+6-5.
459
3+:,40-5.
6<+
=-3@6
@+56+50+
1=
6<+
@+0159
:434.34:<
;-6<
6<+
=1,,1;-5.t
*e<+
=1,,1;-5.
@<4,,
516
/+
015@-9+3+9
u>5015631,,4/,+
d130+@vt
w-x
?+,,+3v@
01@6
1=
1/64-5-5.
qBA@y
04:40-67
459r13
+5+3.7s
w--x
z{7+3v@
-54/-,-67
!
%
`
!
ip$
%%'
|
'
%!
ip$
%%'
|
'}
!
=4-,{3+
1=
z{7+3v@
243f+6@~
>5015631,,4/,+
d130+@
247
-50,{9+
6<+
=4-,{3+
13 9-@3{:6-15
-5
+,-g+3-+@
1=
iha
!
II
!
%#
&'}
!(H$
a
I
!
ip
!
%
``%
$
a
!
`
%%#
ip
c'v
iha
%%
(!
Fo
c
'
`(
`
iha
`%'
e<+
@+56+50+
*l
e
Bq
lmlB?
q
qBmBB?
lqB
BqBz
klB~8
-5
?+06-15
~
1=
6<+
k?
D #
'
%
(!
!
`( )
*mele
d
lmlB?~
dq
zqBlA
d
l
q?
d
e
?
Adqmle
lqBBmBe
n
p
D
i&iaa
ii
iDaji
n
DDhia
a
&i$
ajp
i&iaa
ii
q
mBl?>qB
d
lmlB?
?
e
B
?B
l
BA>?B
qBmBy
e
B
zqv?
lze
dq
"i
ciDp
aD
ci
"i
Da
ai"
n"
ajp
&a$
D
D
"i
iiia
n
DDhia
D"
D
ij"
Di
Di
n
i&iaa
ii
iDaji
n
DDhia
a
&i
"a
Dhiii"
n
D
&D"pjD
ciDp$
Dc"
n
"i
ciDp
a
"i
"
ip"
DDhia
DhDa"
"i
&D"
D
"
"a
ip"a$
icia
n
"a
hih
cia$
nnpia$
i&iia$
Dhi"a$
D
ajp
ip"
DDhia
Di
"i
ai
D
ipjai
ii
ji
"a
Dhiii"
n
"i
ciDp$
D
D
"i
iiia
n
DDhia
D"
D
ij"
Di
Di
i"i
&D"$
"a
ip"a$
icia
n
"a
hih
cia$
nnpia$
i&iia$
Dhi"a
Di
Dci
n
D
"i
"&i
n
DDhi$
pjh
pi"D$
&j"i$
ii&D$
paiji"D$
a&ipD
ip"
DDhia
n
D
D"ji
pjh
DDhia
DaapD"i
"
a"
&n"a$
cjaiaa
"ij&"
D
aa
n
h
Dah
D"
D
"i$
i"i
""
pjh
"i
ai
p"cj"
ihhipi
n
i"i
&D"
D
iD"i
&ia$
DD"$
a"p"
Dc"$
p"Dp"
a"D"j"i$
ji
l
Bme
q?y
q
e
Bqk?B~8
b
aI%
b
F$
b
G$
b
b
b
`
!
a&&
D #
!I'
%
(!
!
`( )
*~
H
`
'
"
iDp
&D"
Dia$
"
"i
njia"
i"i"
&i""i
c
D
$
D
h"
"
D
Di
"
D
"D
c
j
ia&ip"
n
D
aj"$
Dp"$
pD
&piih
qBle
e
e
?
lqBBmBe~8
¡
¢¡£¤¥¦¤
§¨
©ª«¬®¯°±¬²²°±¯³°±´µ©±¶¶®«¬¢©«¶®µ
!"
##$
%&
&
&%
!$
&
'
()*+
,-./0+1
-2.++
/*-/
+-3*
,-./451
67108+11
398101/1
08 :*9;+
9. 08
<-./
9=
+8/+.082
08/9
=9.:-.>
398/.-3/1
-1
9. :0/*
&
&%&"
"
?@AB
$
%
#"
C!D
&#
$&
&
& E
F
&
C
&
&
&&
%C
C&
&"
A
&
C
&
%
G
#
H
&
$&
&
G#G
&#
&%&"
& I
"
?@AB
$
&
%
#"
C!D
&#
$&
&
& E
J
&
"
&##
&
!
&"
C
G
&#
&C
"
&
&
&
"
B
&##
!
&
&B
&
$&
&
&
&
&&
%C
C&B
&"
A
&
C
&
%
G
#
H
K2.++L+8/M
-.+
89/N
9. 1*-;;
89/
6+
/.+-/+>
-1N
=9.:-.>
398/.-3/1
78>+.
/*+
O80/+>
P/-/+1
Q-8R.7</34
S9>+TU
V
)*+
=9;;9:082
<*.-1+
01 081+./+>
-/
/*+
6+2088082
9=
P+3/098
WXY
(Z8
/*+
>-/+
9=
+8/+.082
08/9
/*01
S98=0.L-/098NUT
A &#"E
@&
&
"
[
&
\C"
C!D
]C
A&#
&
C!#
?
^G
A
_`Ha
]E
b(S,cKUM
-8>
/*-/
-;;
39LL7803-/0981
-8>
>937L+8/1
%
&
A
&
&
C!D
#C
!#
&
A?E
@&
&
"
G
&##
&"
&G
C
A?
%
&
&##
&
]C
#C
C
&
C&
%
&
A
&E
_
d#G
"
dC
&E
e
&
$
&!G
&
&
&
!#
&
&
"
C
f&
&
A
&B
&
&
"
&##
%
G
%&
"
%
&##
&B
#CB
%C!#
&
C
G
&
"
&C
[&
$
%
gCB
#G
"
&
%
&
!"
&
&
"
f&
E
@
h
J
e
&#
f &E
F
A
&B
$
f&
B
F
&&
$
&
&G
&
&##
C
&
!$
&
#&
%C
&
&
&#
CE
J$&
&"
%
G
B
F
&&
&"
!
#"
C
&
$
C
gC
!"
!
&
B
&
&
&
A
&
&##
!
&!#
g%
C
&
$
C
gC
!"
!
&
E
ij
klmn
opqrsqts
uv
mwxywz{
|}~ywoywttq
qyxwt
&
!
&
&##
&
%
%
&
B
& &
G$
&
&"
&B
&
B
#&&B
B
$
%
%
!"
&
&
"
g
&
&"
$&G
C!
!
!#$
C
&!#
G
&
C
&
"B
&
%&
"
@?A
&
N
1*-;;
19;+;4
6+
/*+
(<76;03
08/+.+1/U
-<<;03-/098
9=
/*+
(71/
-8>
.+-198-6;+U
1/-8>-.>
9=
.+0+:
1+/
=9./*
08
B
a
EE
H
`
V
&
¡¡
¢
B
a
EE
£
`
V
&
#&
!"
¤
¥
¦
§
¨
©
ª
¢
«¡«B
£
EE
H_
Haa
B
&
©¬
¤
¥
¡¡B
EE
H_
HaaE
!
®
& B
&
$&
C!
&B
C##
g
%
!"
&%%#&!#
#&$B
&
&
"B
#
&
C
&
&
B
!"
g%
#"
&
G&!#"
$&G
&"
&
&"
&GB
$
CC
B
$
C
¯¯
Ha
& I
HaV
&#
$
$B
°
!&
@?A
!"
&"
&B
#"
#"
C
%#&B
G
&
$B
&
&
!"
G&
&
&
&
&"
°
!&B
&
@?A
&
&"
%"
&B
&
B
#&&B
&
!"
&
B
!
g%
&
&B
C##
g
%
!"
&%%#&!#
#&$B
&
"
&##
C#&
&##"
°
!&
@?A
&"
#
&
&B
&
B
#&&B
B
$&
&"
C!]C
&
&%%#&!#
#&$
&
°
&
&"
C
E
®
G
$
!
&
&%%#&!#
#&$
%
#C
&
$&G
°
&
@?A
&
°!&
%$
&#
&
#C
G&
C!
!
&##
&%%#"B
%
G
&B
$
C!
&B
&
"
&##
°
&"
C
&
g%
##"
78>+.
/*+
(<76;03
08/+.+1/U
-<<;03-/098
9=
/*+
(71/
-8>
.+-198-6;+U
1/-8>-.>
9=
.+0+:
-8>
9/*+.:01+
-1
1+/
=9./*
08 /*+
&E
lj
iwvyrypy}r±²³rpwt´twpqpy}r±µ
%C
%
A
&B
##$
&
C#
%
&
&##
&%%#"'
¶·¸¹º»¼½
¾½¿ÀÁ·ÂÀ
öÄ
ÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÈÎÎÌÍÉËÏÌÍÉÐÑÅÍÒÒÊÇȶ¾ÅÇÒÊÑ
!
!"#!"!
$%&
# '
%
%())%% *
!
+ , &-
!
.!/0
%
+
!" "
!
.+
&!%
!/0
! ,$
# , &
!"
#
)
%'
)"
"
!
!
+(0
)
1
%
"
)
!%
2 *33
(,
2 *24
!"
!
+(0
)
.%( )%
"
)
!%
45678
(,
45653'
%
%()
# 9
%
!%
&!""
%(##
&!"
&
&
&*
:
;<
=>?@AB?
CBDE
=A??A
AB
?;
BDF>;ABE
FGGABH
:
)
!
-
?@
II>?GJ>-
;<
GB;?@?G;?A
JE
;<
=B;?@?G;?A
KF;<AB?;E
A@
;<
##
)0
+ , &
L
M
)
!
!"
) )
%
)%
.:
'
L
M
N(
)
!
.!/0
:! ,$
O)
$
.!/0
:! ,$
( )
(!"
##
)0
+ , &'
L
M
P
9 $
.:
L
9M
)&#
!)
/
N(
&!%
##
)0
+ , &*
+1
&!%
!
+(0
)
1
%
&&
%%
!
%
,(
$
%())%% *
O:.
&!%
O"
:! ,$
.,(
$
&&
%%
!
%
,(
$
%())%% *
Q
%!"%
!" "
Q &%
!"
!"
!%
+1
!,
#( )%
!"
%
%
+ "()*
RST
!,
U
&!%
)
!"
$
!
/
)
##
)0
.:
%
/
,! "*
V:
&!%
V% !
:
)
)
$
"
!
!,
(!)
%
%())%%
,!
W
!%*
V.:X
&!%
V% !
.!/0
:! ,$
X!
!
!
&
!
$%&
%
%())%%
%$%&%*
Y/
%!"
!,
!$
!,
)!
!"
!
Z%
, &!
)! $'
%
!
&
!
%
!
$
0
)
9
/!
[)("
0$
0
+
%*
Y
VQY:
V\:.:O'
+
%
9
%
,!"
%
!
&
!
)
9
%
:
)
9
P*
]^_`
ab
cadef^gge
hijkk
lmjnop
qrnsi
tujnvwx
yzh{|
}~~
$
$
Y&
P&
!
)
%$
Y&
Q
$
Z!,
Q
¡¢£¤
¥¤
¦§
§£
¨¢§¤
©§¢¤§
ª
§
!
"
#
"$%
&
'$ ()
'*(
+
*
,
$
-
..
/0
123/+
/0
45665789
:;-
!<
=
.
-
$
>)<
2%$--?
.
-
$
@$
!=
.
-
$
<
)
0$
ABCDEC
AFG
H
AFGBE
IBGJFECB
KLHMMI
NHOP
ARS
HTUV
H
WBXREYZ
AFGBE
M[
\\I
AFGBE
IBGJFECB
KLUUH
NPHH
]RY
HTUK
U
A^C_B
NCD
`FE
\\I
NCD
`Ra
WR
YF
KOVMT
WBb
HTUP
L
A^C_B
NCD
AF^
\\I
NCD
`Ra
WR
YF
KOVM
WBb
HTUP
O
A
RGG
CREcb
QFEJFGF
DDFCd
ef]
ef]
ef]
ef]
ghijklmn
onpqrhsq
tgu
vwxyz{|}~y}~z|}~zv~{xygovx{
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.14
File #: 0800-04 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-687
Title: Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Fence and Landscaping Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Samuel Benjamin 916-746-1305 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a construction agreement with Ornamental Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $325,388 for the construction of the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Fence and Landscaping Project, and approval of a budget adjustment to fully fund the construction and construction management services to closeout the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Trail Project in the amount of $760,000 from the Local Transportation Fund. The scope of the Fence and Landscaping project includes construction of an 8-foottall steel and redwood fence, landscaping and irrigation along the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Trail west of Sunrise Avenue. Work is expected to begin in summer 2026 and be completed by early 2027. Staff also recommends approval for change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed 15% of the contract price. The project is funded with Local Transportation Funds. No General Fund resources will be used for the project.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution to award the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Fence and Landscaping Project to Ornamental Solutions, Inc. and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed 15% of the contract price; and
3. Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $760,000 to fully fund project construction, and continued construction management of the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Trail Project.
BACKGROUND
During construction of the Dry Creek Greenway Phase 1 Trail, it was determined that a fence was needed alongside the trail to prevent trail users from unintentionally viewing cultural ceremonies on property owned by the California Rural Indian Health Board (CRIHB). The Public Works Department worked collaboratively with CRIHB staff to address their concerns as well as meet FEMA's regulations for construction of a fence within the floodplain.
The project proposes to construct a flood responsive fence along the south side of the Dry Creek
Greenway East - Phase 1 Trail. Improvements include installation of an 8-foot tall redwood and steel fence, new landscaping and irrigation.
At the June 17, 2026, meeting, Council approved the plans and specifications for the project and authorized staff to call for bids. The bid opening was held on July 28, 2026, and a total of three bids were received. The following is a summary of the engineer's estimate and the three bids received:
Engineer's Estimate $681,450.00
Ornamental Solutions, Inc. $325,388.00
EVT Builders, LLC $714,966.49
Saenz Landscape Construction $1,815,776.80
Staff recommend awarding the construction contract to Ornamental Solutions, Inc. and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed 15% of the contract price. Staff is requesting the 15% contingency, beyond the typical 10%, because of the close proximity to Dry Creek and the potential for unforeseen conditions within the floodplain.
Although active construction work is complete on the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Trail Project, staff and the City's construction management team from HDR Construction Control Corporation are continuing to work with the contractor to resolve outstanding issues that arose during construction. These issues largely arose from unforeseen field conditions encountered throughout construction. The most significant challenges encountered to date include the implementation of erosion repairs and responding to environmental and cultural resource sensitivity concerns.
The requested budget adjustment of $760,000 appropriates funds from the Local Transportation Funds to fully fund project construction, change order authority, construction management, continued construction management of Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Trail Project and staff costs.
Construction of the project is anticipated to begin in summer 2026 and be completed by late fall 2026.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Public Works staff will continue communicating with the adjacent property owner. Additionally, the Public Affairs and Communications Department will keep the community informed of any relevant project impacts, including potential trail closures. These notifications may include, but are not limited to: signage, email newsletters, website (roseville.ca.gov/PublicWorks), and social media updates.
FISCAL IMPACT
The requested budget adjustment of $760,000 appropriates funds from the Local Transportation Funds to fully fund Fence and Landscaping construction, change order authority, construction management, continued construction management of Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Trail Project and staff costs. No General Fund resources will be used for construction of this project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the construction of a fence. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA
as a Class 11 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15311). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Samuel Benjamin, Junior Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-337
2. Agreement
3. Ordinance 7105
4. Location Map
5. Bid Summary Sheet
6. Notice of Intent to Award
7. CEQA Exemption
8. Faithful Performance Bond
9. Labor and Materials Bond
REVIEWERS:
Samuel Benjamin, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Created/Initiated - 8/21/2026 Jesse Khatkar, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Approved - 8/25/2026 Noah Siviglia, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Approved - 8/26/2026 Stefanie Kemen, Public Works Department - Administration Division Approved - 8/26/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/3/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/3/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/4/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/4/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-337
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ORNAMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an Agreement for the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Fence Landscaping Project, by and between the City of Roseville and Ornamental Solutions, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the contract price.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 7105
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2026-27, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Fence and landscaping Project.
SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 07/14/2026
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCAL YEAR:
PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6520 6587 84001 400022 698,000 Increase Capital Outlay budget for the Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Phase 1 project.
6520 5080 84001 400022 62,000 Increase Internal Project Labor budget for the Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Phase 1 project.
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 760,000
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6520 4425 84001 400022 760,000 Increase Local Transportation Funds budget for the Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Phase 1 project.
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL 760,000
NET ADJUSTMENT -
FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project DESCRIPTION
FUND BALANCE TOTAL -
Justification for Budget Adjustment:
The Public Works Department is requesting this budget adjustment to increase the budget for the Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Phase 1 project (400022) in the Transportation Fund (6520).
The additional funding will cover construction costs, construction management, and staff costs to complete the project.
The current budget is $36,063,481 and the revised project budget will be $36,823,481.
Samuel Benjamin, Junior Engineer 2026-27
Samuel Benjamin, Junior Engineer
Public Works - Engineering
LOCATION MAP
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD
Date: September 2, 2026
To: All bidders, concerning the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Fence and Landscaping Project Request for Proposals
From: Public Works Engineering
Subject: Notice of Intent to Award
Regarding the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Fence and Landscaping Project, for which the above referenced Request for Proposals was released on July 10, 2026, and for which bids were received, opened and read publicly by the City Clerk’s office on July 28, 2026, a lowest responsive bidder has been determined.
The City has determined Ornamental Solutions Inc. to be the lowest responsive bidder and intends to recommend City Council approval of a Construction Agreement with Ornamental Solutions Inc. at the September 16, 2026 City Council Meeting.
Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: California Rural Indian Health Board (CRIHB) Fence Project Location(s): 1020 Sundown Way and 726 Sunrise Avenue (APNs 471-220-002 and -025), Roseville, CA 95661
Project Description: The Public Works Department proposes to construct 950 linear feet of fence along the south side of the Dry Creek Greenway East – Phase 1 Trail, and immediately adjacent to property owned by the California Rural Indian Health Board (CRIHB), located at 1020 Sundown Way. Improvements include installation of an 8-foot tall redwood and steel fence, minor grading, and new landscaping. Most of the fence would be built on City-owned property, but a portion would follow along trail easement that crosses into western corner of the CRIHB’s property. The fence would be appurtenant to CRIHB’s facility and provide privacy between it and users of the public Dry Creek Greenway East trail.
Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Public Works Department Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 11 Exemption as described in Section 15311 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 11 consists of construction, or placement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities…” The project involves the construction of a fence to provide privacy between a public trail and a property owned by the CRIHB and would be accessory to that property, so the Class 11 Categorical Exemption is applicable to the project.
Lead Agency Contact Person: Cathy Gosalvez, Associate Engineer, Public Works Department – Engineering Division, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678. (916) 746- 1300
Signature: Date: 3/24/2025
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.15
File #: 0900-04 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-718
Title: Storm Drain Repair Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment Contact: Joseph Arino 916-774-5460 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a construction agreement with BRCO Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $1,451,905 for the Storm Drain Repair Project, and approval of a budget adjustment to fully fund construction in the amount of $860,000 from the Highway Users Tax Fund. The project will include the rehabilitation of existing drainage systems and construction of new drainage systems. Staff also requests approval for change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed 10% of the contract price. The project is funded by the General Fund ($1,450,000) and Highway User Tax Fund ($910,000 with the recommended budget adjustment). Work is expected to begin in September 2026 and be completed by summer 2027.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution to award the Storm Drain Repair Project to BRCO Constructors Inc., and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Roseville, and
2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed 10% of the contract price; and
3. Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $860,000 to fully fund project construction.
BACKGROUND
The Storm Drain Repair Project (SDRP) consists of a combination of rehabilitation of existing storm drain systems and construction of new storm drain systems to reduce localized street flooding. The existing drainage systems will be cleaned and receive a cure-in-place pipe liner to seal the length of the system to increase the life span of the pipe segment. New drainage systems will consist of a combination of curb & gutter, drain inlets, manholes, and mainline storm drain pipe. Project locations include sections of Royer Park, Piedmont Way, storm drain connecting Edgemond Way and Sheffield Way, PFE Road, and East Street.
At the June 17, 2026, meeting, Council approved the plans and specifications for the project and authorized staff to call for bids. The bid opening was held on August 4, 2026, and a total of five bids were received. The following is a summary of the engineer's estimate and the three lowest bids received:
Bidder's Name Base Bid Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Total
Given
the
bids received, it is recommended to award the base bid plus the add alternate bid items.
Construction of the project is expected to begin in September 2026 and be completed by summer 2027.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Public Works staff will be working closely with the Public Affairs & Communications Department to continue to keep the community informed of the project's benefits, progress, and construction impacts.
Communications include, but are not limited to: direct mail, signage, social media, project webpage (roseville.ca.gov/drainage), and email newsletters.
(PFE Rd) (East St)
Engineer's Estimate $ 1,503,800.00 $ 54,800.00 $ 101,400.00 $ 1,660,000.00 BRCO
Constructors
$ 1,125,170.00 $ 128,025.00 $ 198,710.00 $ 1,451,905.00 ARB $ 1,498,524.00 $ 183,022.00 $ 177,532.00 $ 1,859,078.00 Frontline General $ 1,536,220.18 $ 155,457.48 $ 254,964.01 $ 1,946,641.67
FISCAL IMPACT
The project was previously funded by $1,450,000 from the General Fund and $50,000 from the Highway Users Tax Fund. The requested budget adjustment of $860,000 from the Highway Users Tax Fund provides sufficient funding for change order authority, construction management and inspection, staff labor, and for adequate funding of the alternate bid items.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project qualifies for Class 1, Class 3, and Class 4 Categorical Exemptions as described in Sections 15301, 15303, and 15304 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
The proposed project involves the repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of an existing facility (Class 1 Exemption State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301), construction of a limited number of small facilities (Class 3 Exemption State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303), and minor alteration in the condition of the land, water, and or vegetation which will not remove healthy, mature scenic trees (Class 4 Exemption State CEQA Guidelines Section 15304). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Joseph Arino, Assistant Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. SDRP - Area Map
2. Resolution 26-342
3. SDRP - Agreement
4. Ordinance 7107
5. SDRP - CEQA
6. SDRP - Notice of Intent to Award
7. Labor and Materials Bond
8. Faithful Performance Bond
REVIEWERS:
Joseph Arino, Public Works Department - Infrastructure Maintenance Projects Created/Initiated - 8/26/2026
Jesse Khatkar, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Approved - 8/26/2026 Joseph Anderson, Public Works Department - Infrastructure Maintenance Projects
Approved - 8/26/2026
Noah Siviglia, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Approved - 8/26/2026 Stefanie Kemen, Public Works Department - Administration Division Approved - 8/31/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/4/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/7/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/8/2026
WOODCREEK OAKS BL
1 2
3 4
5 [
0 1 2
Miles
Project #500259
2026 Storm Drain Repair Project - Area Map
Number Location
1 Royer Park: From Park Dr to Dry Creek
2 Edgemont Way: From Edgemont Way to Sheffield Way
3 PFE Rd: From 1961 PFE Rd to Hilltop Circle
4 Piedmont Way: From South Cirby Way to Sheridan Ave
5 East St: From the alley to East St
RESOLUTION NO. 26-342
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND BRCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an Agreement for the Storm Drain Repair Project, by and between the City of Roseville and BRCO Constructors, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 7107
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2026-27, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Storm Drain Repair Project.
SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 07/14/2026
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE:
PREPARER NAME & TITLE:
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
FISCAL YEAR:
ORDINANCE:
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
DESCRIPTION
2305 5411 84001 500259 540,000 Increase Repairs & Maintenance budget for the Storm Drain Repair project.
2305 5080 84001 500259 200,000 Increase Internal Project Labor budget for the Storm Drain Repair project.
2305 5301 84001 500259 120,000 Increase Professional Services budget for the Storm Drain Repair project.
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 860,000
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
DESCRIPTION
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 860,000
FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project
DESCRIPTION
2305 3601 00000 000000 (860,000) Decrease Highway Users Tax Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (860,000)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:
The Public Works Department is requesting a budget adjustment of $860,000 to increase the Storm Drain Repair Project (500259) budget from available resources in the Highway Users Tax (2305) fund.
The additional funding will cover construction costs, construction management, and staff costs to complete the project.
The current project budget is $1,500,000. With this adjustment, the revised project budget will total $2,360,000.
Joe Anderson, Senior Engineer 2026-27
Joe Anderson, Senior Engineer
Public Works - Engineering
Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Storm Drain Repair Project (SDRP)
Project Location(s): Multiple locations. See details below.
Project Description: The Public Works Department is proposing the Storm Drainage Repair Project (SDRP) to make various improvements in six locations in need of improvements to ensure proper drainage and functionality of the existing storm drainage system.
Three of the improvements would line the inside of the existing storm drain pipeline using dynaliner or equivalent materials and technology. The pipelines would be accessed from existing manhole covers and drain inlet gates located in existing public roadways, a liner would be inserted into the deteriorated pipelines, inflated, and then steam would be used to cure the liner to the inside of the pipelines by created a new interior surface. No trenching or digging would be required. The installation of the liner material may clean out any built-up materials stuck inside the pipeline, if present. This process uses no chemicals or hazardous materials.
The three locations where these improvements would occur are:
• Approximately 1,575 linear feet of pipeline between existing manholes located in Vineyard Road and Atkinson Street. This pipeline runs beneath the Denio’s Market property. • Approximately 939 linear feet beneath Royer Park, accessed from a drain inlet in Park Street at Claiborne Street, discharging to an outfall into Dry Creek. This maintenance activity is consistent with discharge requirements.
• Approximately 787 liner feet between existing manholes in Sheffield Way and Edgemont Way. This pipeline runs within an 18-foot public utility easement through the rear yards of 21 residential properties.
In addition to these actions, the project includes two locations where new drainage infrastructure will be installed to correct existing drainage deficiencies that regularly cause residential flooding.
Both new drainage systems would be constructed using trenching.
The first of these includes a new approximately 600-foot drainage pipeline constructed within Piedmont Way between South Cirby Way and Sheridan Avenue, which would link two separate drainage systems to improve the functionality and alleviate residential flooding caused by the existing system being undersized. This improvement does not increase development capacity. This component of the project was originally approved by the City Council in July 2019 as part of the Hillcrest Drainage Improvement Project and has not changed since then. It has been added to this project as budget allows.
The second new drainage improvement would similarly improve functionality to a currently undersized and inadequate drainage system located near East Street. The proposed new pipeline would be trenched from the alley located between Parry Street and East Street, through a drainage easement located along the eastern property line of 406 East Street (APN 013-025-020-000) to an existing drainage line located in East Street. It would not add any new development capacity.
The sixth planned improvement would install approximately 340 feet of new curb and gutters along the south side of PFE Road south of the Roseville Corporation Yard. This improvement would be completed within existing City-owned right-of-way adjacent to two properties, 1991 and 2031 PFE Road (APNs 474-120-024-000 and 473-100-003-000, respectively), which are both located outside of the city.
Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Public Works Department Reason why this Project is Exempt: The project qualifies for Class 1, Class 3, and Class 4 Categorical Exemptions as described in Sections 15301, 15303, and 15304 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 1 consists of the … repair, maintenance, [and]…minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, [and]… topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use… Examples include but are not limited to:
(b) Existing facility of bother investor and publicly owned utilities used to provide electric power, natural gas, sewerage, or other public utility services; [and] (d) Restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated or damaged structures, facilities, or mechanical equipment to meet current standards of public health and safety…” and “Class 3 consists of construction and located of limited numbers of new, small facilities [and]… installation of new small equipment and facilities… Examples of this exemption include, but are not limited to:
(d) Water main, sewerage, electrical, gas and other utility extensions, including street improvements, of reasonable length to serve such construction.” and “Class 4 consists of minor public or private alterations in the condition of land, water, and/or vegetation which do not involve removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees…Examples include, but are not limited to:
(f) Minor trenching and backfilling where the surface is restored.” The project consists of six improvements located in various areas of the city experiencing inadequacies within the current drainage system. Three areas experience flooding due to a lack of or undersized drainage infrastructure. Improvements to correct these inadequacies include the construction of new curbs and gutters and installation of two new pipelines to alleviate existing flooding issues, none of which would result in expansion of use, consistent with the Class 1, 3, and 4 Exemptions. The project would also reline three existing damaged pipelines in need of repair and maintenance in order to maintain public health and safety standards, consistent with the Class 1 Exemption. All project components would improve deficiencies in the existing drainage systems without expansion of use, no trees would be removed, and all areas requiring trenching would be restored. Consequently, the Class 1, Class 3, and Class 4 Categorical Exemptions apply.
Lead Agency Contact Person: Joseph Arino, Roseville Department of Public Works (916-774- 5460).
Signature: Date: 5/14/2026
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD
Date: August 10, 2026
To: All bidders, concerning the Storm Drain Repair Project From: Public Works Engineering
Subject: Notice of Intent to Award
Regarding the Storm Drain Repair Project, for which the call for bids was released on July 14, 2026 and for which bids were received, by the City Clerk’s office on August 4, 2026; a lowest bid from a contractor meeting the qualifications outlined in the bid documents was received.
The City has determined BRCO Constructors, Inc as qualified lowest bidder and intends to recommend City Council approval contract award at the September 16, 2026 City Council Meeting.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.16
File #: 0900-02 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-710
Title: Cirby Way Water Pipeline Repair Project (RFP #08-158) - Design-Assist Construction Agreement & Budget Adjustment
Contact: Jose Bygoytia-Amaya 916-774-5754 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval and award of a design-assist construction agreement to Preston Pipelines Infrastructure LLC for the Cirby Way 24-Inch Main Replacement Project in the amount of $3,677,500 and authorization for the Environmental Utilities Director or his designee to approve and pay for contract change orders that could increase the contract amount by no more than 10 percent or $367,750. This item also requests approval of construction plans, specifications, and a budget adjustment of $4,780,000 from the Water Rehabilitation Fund to increase the total project budget to $4,950,000
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution to approve the Design-Assist Construction Agreement with Preston Pipelines Infrastructure, LLC for the Cirby Way 24-Inch Main Replacement Project with Preston Pipelines Infrastructure, LLC and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City.
2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price, or $367,750.
3. Approve the project’s construction plans and specifications.
4. Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment of $4,780,000 from available resources in the Water Rehabilitation Fund.
BACKGROUND
In December 2023, a failure on the 24-inch water main pipeline (the pipeline is over 50 years old) that runs underneath Cirby Way resulted in a sinkhole. The affected section is located at an infill road section located between Vernon St. and Riverside Ave.
Water Utility field staff responded to the incident and were able to isolate the pipeline and repair the affected road sections. In February 2024, a consultant was hired to conduct ground penetrating radar (GPR) scan of the area where the sinkhole was formed to confirm that the repair work had been successful and that no additional sinkholes had formed. GPR technology is also capable of locating shallow (less than 8 feet) utilities, and while GPR was able to identify subsurface anomalies which have been addressed, GPR was not able to identify any utilities in the area that were deeper than 8 feet.
Further research into other means for locating the pipeline identified that radio detection technology was the most effective way to locate pipelines deeper than 10 feet. Utilizing this technology, Water Utility field staff marked the assumed alignment of the pipeline along the road but have not been able to physically
verify the results. Based on as-built drawings, the pipeline was buried underneath an old storm creek. At its deepest location, it is believed to be over 25 feet below the existing ground surface and approximately 10 feet at the points of inflection on either side of the storm drain.
In January 2026, staff published Request for Proposals (RFP) #08-158 for Construction services, using a Design-Assist project delivery method. The intended scope of the RFP was to have the awarded contractor locate and identify the affected pipeline. On March 11, 2026, one construction firm submitted a proposal to the City Clerk’s office for review and consideration. Based upon review of the proposal by EU’s Proposal Evaluation Committee, the proposal by Preston Pipelines Infrastructure, LLC (Preston Pipeline) was identified as providing value to the City based on the evaluation criteria outlined in the RFP. Staff therefore recommend that the contract be awarded to Preston Pipelines Infrastructure, LLC.
FISCAL IMPACT
The current project budget is $170,000 and will require an additional $4,780,000 from available resources in the Water Rehabilitation Fund to cover: the Design-Assist Construction Agreement with Preston Pipelines for $3,677,500, contingency for potential change order not exceeding $367,750, additional costs for Engineering Services During Construction, Construction Management Services, Public outreach and impact mitigation, permit fees, and secondary labor of City staff working on this project.
This item includes a budget adjustment that requests of $4,780,000 from available funds in the Water Rehabilitation Fund to bring the project total to $4,950,000.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the repair and minor alteration of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Jose Bygoytia-Amaya, Assistant Engineer
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-338
2. Design Assist Construction Agreement
3. VOLUME 3 OF 4 Cirby Way Drawings
4. VOLUME 4 OF 4 Cirby Way (Specifications)
5. Ordinance 7106
6. CEQA Exemption
7. Performance Bond
8. Labor and Materials Bond
9. Warranty Bond
REVIEWERS:
Jose Bygoytia-Amaya, Environmental Utilities Department - Water Created/Initiated - 8/14/2026 George Hanson, City Clerk Department Approved - 8/18/2026 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 8/24/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department - All Approved - 8/24/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/4/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/7/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/8/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-338
APPROVING A DESIGN-ASSIST CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN
PRESTON PIPELINE INFRASTRUCTURE, LLC, AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Design-Assist Construction Agreement for the Cirby Way Water Pipeline Repair Project, by and between the City of Roseville and Preston Pipeline Infrastructure, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
SHEET SCALE: WARNING IF THIS BAR DOES NOT MEASURE 1" NOT TO SCALE. THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED DRAWN 1/2 0 1 DESIGNED DOMENICHELLI & ASSOCIATES 2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750 Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSLV011-G1.DWG 20251210.184855 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO. OF REGISTERED PROFES IONAL ENGINEERDARYL W. HE IGHER S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA No. C 62011 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT VICINITY MAP UTILITY CONTACT INFORMATION VOLUME 3 OF 4 OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR LOCATION MAP CITY OF ROSEVILLE - ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT JWD RVL DWH COVER SHEET G11 DRAWING INDEX SHEET DRAWING TITLE 1 G1 COVER SHEET 2 G2 GENERAL NOTES 3 G3 ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLOGY 4 G4 TRENCH PAVEMENT RESTORATION 5 G5 ROADWAY REPAIR PLAN 6 C1 PLAN & PROFILE CIRBY WAY 7 C2 PLAN & PROFILE INGLIS & PROMENADE 8 C3 OVERALL SITE PLAN 9 D1 ROSEVILLE STANDARD DETAILS 1 10 D2 ROSEVILLE STANDARD DETAILS 2 11 T1 ROSEVILLE STANDARD DETAILS 3 12 T2 TIE-IN DETAILS 1 BID SET DESIGN-ASSIST AND CONSTRUCTION OF RFP # 08-158 13 T2 TIE-IN DETAILS 2 12/09/2025 01/07/2026 12/30/2025
SHEET
SCALE: WARNING
IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"
NOT TO SCALE.
THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED
DRAWN 0 1/2 1 DESIGNED
DOMENICHELLI
& ASSOCIATES
2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750
Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSLV011-G2.DWG 20251210.182750 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO.
OF REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERDARYL W. HE IGHER S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA No. C 62011
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT
JWD
RVL
DWH
GENERAL NOTES
G22
SHEET
SCALE: WARNING
IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"
NOT TO SCALE.
THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED
DRAWN 0 1/2 1 DESIGNED
DOMENICHELLI
& ASSOCIATES
2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750
Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSLV011-G2.DWG 20251210.182750 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO.
OF REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERDARYL W. HE IGHER S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA No. C 62011
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT
JWD
RVL
DWH
ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLOGY
G33
JENNINGS APN 472-143-020-000 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 8''SS 8''SS 10''SD 10''SD 10''SD
42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD
42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD
12''SD
6''SS
6''SS 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 6''W
6''SS 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W
6''W 6''W
W
W
W
W
W
W E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM E E G G SHEET SCALE: WARNING IF THIS BAR DOES NOT MEASURE 1" NOT TO SCALE. THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED DRAWN 0 1/2 1 DESIGNED DOMENICHELLI & ASSOCIATES 2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750 Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\EXH - PAVEMENT.DWG 20251119.130517 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO. OF REGISTERED PROFES IONAL ENGINEERDARYL W. HE IGHER S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA No. C 62011 CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT JWD RVL DWH 4 24"W 8"W 24"W
8"W 24"W 24"W CIRBY WAY
INGLIS WAY G4 TRENCH PAVEMENT RESTORATION SEE SHEET G5 FOR ROADWAY REPAIR PLAN ROAD SECTION TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED IN ITS ENTIRETY; SEE DETAIL A ON SHEET G5 REMOVE AND REPLACE SIDEWALK, CURB, AND GUTTER AS REQUIRED PER CoR DETAIL
6''SS 6''SS 6''SS
6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS
6''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS SS
10''SD 10''SD 10''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 12''SD
6''SS
6''SS
6''SS
24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''SS 6''SS 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W
6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
E E
E E E 6''SS
SS
SS
E E E E E E
E
E
E
E E E
G
G
G
G
G G G
G
G
G G G G G G G G G G
G
G
G
COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM E
E
G
230.0'
100.0' 132.0'
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE EXTREME CARE TO
PROTECT EXISTING SITE AND ADJACENT
IMPROVEMENTS FROM DAMAGE. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR OR MAKE
REPLACEMENT OF ALL CRACKED AND OTHERWISE
DAMAGED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT THEIR OWN
EXPENSE.
2. CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE IMPACTED STRIPING IN
KIND.
3. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN EXISTING CENTERLINE,
PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PRIOR TO AND FOLLOWING
CONSTRUCTION TO VERIFY.
4. SLURRY TO EXTEND TO LIMITS OF TRENCH REPAIR ON
CIRBY WAY.
NOTES:
LEGEND:
SLURRY SEAL
ROADWAY REPAIR SECTION (SEE DETAIL A
THIS SHEET)
SHEET
SCALE: WARNING
IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"
NOT TO SCALE.
THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED
DRAWN
0 1/2 1 DESIGNED
2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750
P:\PROJ\241002-300 ROSEVILLE-CIRBY WAY PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT\03-PLANS\MASTERS\SHEETS\241002_01-LAYOUT SHEET.DWG 20251203.135300 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO.
OF
N
CIRBY WAY
PROMENADE
PARK APT INGLIS WAY
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT
CDA
MDR
MDR
ROADWAY REPAIR PLAN 5
G5
7.5" HMA
21" CLASS II AB
SUBGRADE
ENHANCEMENT
GEOSYNTHETIC
SUBGRADE
COMPACTED
TO 95%
NTS
8' GEOPOLYMER
INJECTION IN
SUBGRADE
125
130
140
150
160
170
125
130
140
150
160
170
0+50 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+71
STA:3+72.22
ELEV:130.75
STA 1+00 (CIRBY WAY ALIGNMENT)
STA 1+00 (INGLIS ALIGNMENT)
STA 4+07 (CIRBY WAY ALIGNMENT)
STA 1+00 (PROMENADE STUB OUT ALIGNMENT)
(E) 42" SD TP=136.18 (E) 8" SS TP=142.86 (E) 6" SS TP=143.31 (E) 6" W TP=129.62 1' MIN STA: 1+00.00 24''x24''x8'' TEE w/ 24" BFV INV EL:151.63 TOP EL:153.73 STA: 1+20.00 GRADE BREAK INV EL: 151.65 TOP EL: 153.75 STA: 2+59.95 GRADE BREAK INV EL: 147.53 TOP EL: 149.63 STA: 4+06.58 24''x24''x8'' TEE w/ 24" BFV INV EL:147.48 TOP EL:149.58 STA: 5+37.22 CONNECT TO EX 24" PIPE INV EL: 147.54 STA 5+37 (CIRBY WAY ALIGNMENT) TIE IN TO EX 24'' WATER (SEE NOTE 2) (E) COMMS TP=156.17 (E) ELECT TP=155.77 (E) GAS TP=154.03 (E) ELECT TP=152.04 STA: 1+59.98 GRADE BREAK INV EL: 150.28 TOP EL: 152.38
JENNINGS
APN 472-143-020-000
6''SS 6''SS 6''SS
6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS
6''SS 8''SS 8''SS
10''SD 10''SD 10''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 12''SD
6''SS
6''SS
24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 6''W 6''SS 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W
6''W 6''W 6''W
W
W
W
W
W
W
E E
E E E
E E E E E E
E
E
E
E E E
G
G
G G G
G
G
G G G G G G G G G G
G
G
G
COM COM COM COM COM
COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM E
E
G G 1+00 1+42
1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+37 1+00 1+34
SHEET
SCALE: WARNING
IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"
NOT TO SCALE.
THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED
DRAWN
0 1/2 1 DESIGNED
DOMENICHELLI
& ASSOCIATES
2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750
Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSLV011-P&P.DWG 20251210.181047 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO.
OF
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER
DARYL W. HE IGHER
S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA
No. C 62011
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT
JWD
RVL
DWH
PLAN & PROFILE CIRBY WAY
C1
6 CIRBY WAY
24"W 8"W
4' MIN CLR.
NEW 24" PIPE PER CoR
STANDARDS (TYP)
HORIZ 1" = 20'
VERT 1" = 4'
EXISTING 24" PIPE TO BE
ABANDONED IN PLACE.
SEE NOTE 3 & 4.
EXISTING 24" PIPE
TO REMAIN
EXISTING
24" PIPE TO
REMAIN
CONNECT TO
EX 24" WATER
PER DETAIL
CONNECT TO EX
24" DIP PER DETAIL
EX BLOWOFF TO BE
ABANONED IN PLACE PER
CoR STANDARDS (TYP)
PROMENADE
PARK APT
SSMH
RIM= 153.05
10" INV(W)= 143.15
10" INV(E)= 143.15
10" INV(N)= 143.00
DI 12" (NE)
RIM= 152.31
INV= 149.61
SDMH
RIM= 152.87
10" INV(SE)= 148.87
10" INV(E)= 144.32
42" INV (N)= 133.32
42" INV (S)= 133.32
DI 10" RCP (NW)
RIM= 152.44
INV= 148.79
SSMH
RIM= 152.95
10" INV(S)= 141.50
10" INV(N)= 131.75
SSMH
RIM= 155.87
6" INV(SW)= 144.97
10" INV(E)= 144.12 INGLIS WAY
24"W 8"W
24"W
INSTALL TEST
STATION
24"W
CONNECT TO EX 6"
DIP PER DETAIL
INSTALL 24"x6" TEE
W/24" BFV & 8" GV
INSTALL FH
WITH 6" GV
INSTALL 8"x6" TEE W/
6" GV AND 8" MJ PLUG
REMOVE AND DISPOSE
OF EXISTING 24" PIPE
AS NECESSARY
NEW 24" PIPE PER CoR
STANDARDS (TYP)
EXISTING 24" PIPE TO BE
ABANDONDED IN PLACE.
SEE NOTE 3 & 4.
NOTES:
1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE
APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR
SHALL FIELD VERIFY.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE
EXISTING PIPE TO CONFIRM
MATERIAL AND SIZE.
DEPENDING ON FINDINGS, THE
CONNECTION DETAILS MAY BE
REVISED.
3. EXISTING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS
STATE THE 24" PIPE MAY BE
DUCTILE IRON OR
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE.
4. FINAL ABANDONMENT TO
INCLUDE FILLING THE
EXISTING PIPE WITH CSLM PER
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
SECTION 03 34 00.13. PIPE
SHALL BE CUT AS REQUIRED
TO MAKE FINAL CONNECTIONS.
CAUTION AT GAS
CROSSING
ABANDON EXISTING 6"
MAIN TO THE SOUTH
REMOVE AND DISPOSE
OF EXISTING 24" PIPE
AS NECESSARY
INSTALL
32-LB ANODE
140
150
160
170
140
150
160
170
0+50 1+00 1+92 (E) 6" W TP=153.29 STA 1+00 (INGLIS ALIGNMENT) STA 1+00 (CIRBY WAY ALIGNMENT) STA 1+42 (INGLIS ALIGNMENT) TIE IN TO EX 6'' WATER STA: 1+00.00 24''x24''x8'' TEE w/ 8" GV INV EL:151.63 TOP EL:153.73 STA: 1+41.77 8''x8''x8'' TEE INV EL:152.68 TOP EL:153.40 (E) COMMS TP=156.24 (E) COMMS TP=155.97 (E) GAS TP=155.90 (E) COMMS TP=155.89 JENNINGS APN 472-143-020-000 APN 472-143-019-000 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 6''W 6''W
6''SS 6''SS 6''W 6''W
E
E
E
E
G G G
G
G COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
G
G
1+00 1+42 1+00
135
140
150
160
170
135
140
150
160
170
0+50 1+00 1+84 STA: 1+00.00 24''x24''x8'' TEE w/ 8" GV INV EL:147.48 TOP EL:149.58 STA: 1+34.16 8''x8''x6'' TEE INV EL:148.33 TOP EL:149.06 STA 1+00 (PROMENADE STUB OUT ALIGNMENT) STA 4+07 (CIRBY WAY ALIGNMENT) STA 1+34 (PROMENADE STUB OUT ALIGNMENT) INSTALL 8"x6" TEE PER DETAIL 5/T2 (E) COMMS TP=151.72 (E) COMMS TP=151.23 (E) COMMS TP=150.76 SFC PROMENADE PARK INVESTORS LLC APN 472-143-021-000 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS
8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS
SS 10''SD 10''SD 10''SD
42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD
42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD
12''SD
6''SS
6''SS
6''SS 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 6''W
6''W
6''W 6''W 6''W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
E
E
E
E
E
G
G
G
G COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM 4+00 1+00 1+34
SHEET
SCALE: WARNING
IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"
NOT TO SCALE.
THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED
DRAWN
0 1/2 1 DESIGNED
DOMENICHELLI
& ASSOCIATES
2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750
Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSLV011-P&P.DWG 20251210.181047 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO.
OF
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER
DARYL W. HE IGHER
S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA
No. C 62011
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT
JWD
RVL
DWH
PLAN & PROFILE INGLIS & PROMENADE
C2
7 4' MIN CLR.
NEW 8" PIPE PER CoR
STANDARDS (TYP)
EXISTING GRADE
EXISTING 6" PIPE
TO REMAIN CIRBY WAY
8"W
INSTALL 8"X6" TEE
AND FH PER DETAIL
CONNECT TO EX
24" DIP PER DETAIL 24"W
INGLIS WAY CIRBY WAY
CONNECT TO EX 6"
DIP PER DETAIL
PROMENADE
PARK APT
HORIZ 1" = 20'
VERT 1" = 4'
CONNECT TO EX
24" DIP PER DETAIL
3' MIN CLR.
NEW 8" PIPE PER CoR
STANDARDS (TYP)
EXISTING GRADE
8"W 24"W
INSTALL FH
WITH 6" GV
CAUTION GAS
NOTES:
1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE
APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR
SHALL FIELD VERIFY.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE
EXISTING PIPE TO CONFIRM
MATERIAL AND SIZE.
DEPENDING ON FINDINGS, THE
CONNECTION DETAILS MAY BE
REVISED.
3. EXISTING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS
STATE THE 24" PIPE MAY BE
DUCTILE IRON OR
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE.
EXISTING 24" PIPE
TO REMAIN
ABANDON EXISTING 6"
MAIN TO THE SOUTH
JENNINGS
APN 472-143-020-000
LEE
APN 472-143-019-000
VERAS
APN 472-143-018-000
6''SS 6''SS 6''SS
6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS
6''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS SS
10''SD 10''SD 10''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 42''SD 12''SD
6''SS
6''SS
6''SS
24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''SS 6''SS 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W
6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
E E
E E E 6''SS
SS
SS
E E E E E E
E
E
E
E E E
G
G
G
G
G G G
G
G
G G G G G G G G G G
G
G
G G G G
COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM
COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM E
E
G G 1+00 1+42
1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+37 1+00 1+34
SHEET
SCALE: WARNING
IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"
NOT TO SCALE.
THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED
DRAWN
0 1/2 1 DESIGNED
DOMENICHELLI
& ASSOCIATES
2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750
Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSLV011-P&P.DWG 20251210.184951 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO.
OF
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER
DARYL W. HE IGHER
S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA
No. C 62011
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT
JWD
RVL
DWH
OVERALL SITE PLAN 8
CIRBY WAY
CONNECT TO EX 24"
WATER PER DETAIL
EX METER AND
BACKFLOW TO
REMAIN IN PLACE
PROMENADE
PARK APT
A
B
HORIZ 1" = 20'
VERT 1" = 4'
C
C3
EX 24" WATER
EX BLOWOFF TO BE
ABANDONED PER CoR
STANDARDS (TYP)
SSMH
RIM= 153.05
10" INV(W)= 143.15
10" INV(E)= 143.15
10" INV(N)= 143.00
DI 12" (NE)
RIM= 152.31
INV= 149.61
SDMH
RIM= 152.87
10" INV(SE)= 148.87
10" INV(E)= 144.32
42" INV (N)= 133.32
42" INV (S)= 133.32
DI 10" RCP (NW)
RIM= 152.44
INV= 148.79
SSMH
RIM= 152.95
10" INV(S)= 141.50
10" INV(N)= 131.75
SSMH
RIM= 155.87
6" INV(SW)= 144.97
10" INV(E)= 144.12
FL 42" RCP
INV=133.97
42" RCP
TOP=135.69
42" RCP
TOP=137.67
24"W 24"W 24"W 24"W
INSTALL 24"x6" TEE
W/24" BFV & 6" GV
INSTALL FH
PER DETAILS INGLIS WAY
CONNECT TO EX
24" DIP PER DETAIL
CONNECT TO EX 6"
DIP PER DETAIL
TEST STATION AND GALVANIC
ANODE TO BE PLACED IN
LANDSCAPE AREA. FINAL
LOCATION PER CoR.
INSTALL 8"x6" TEE W/
6" GV AND 8" MJ PLUG
EXISTING METER AND BACKFLOW
TO REMAIN IN PLACE.
EXISTING GATE VALVE TO
BE ABANDONED PER CoR
STANDARDS (TYP)
NOTES:
1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE
APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR
SHALL FIELD VERIFY.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE
EXISTING PIPE TO CONFIRM
MATERIAL AND SIZE.
DEPENDING ON FINDINGS, THE
CONNECTION DETAILS MAY BE
REVISED.
3. EXISTING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS
STATE THE 24" PIPE MAY BE
DUCTILE IRON OR
REINFORCED CONCRETE
CYLINDER PIPE.
ABANDON EXISTING 6"
MAIN TO THE SOUTH INSTALL TEST
STATION
INSTALL
32-LB ANODE
EX FH TO BE
REMOVED;
CAP EXISTING
PIPE
REMOVE
EXISTING
HYDRANT AND
CAP EXISTING
PIPE TO REMAIN
SHEET
SCALE: WARNING
IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"
NOT TO SCALE.
THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED
DRAWN 0 1/2 1 DESIGNED
DOMENICHELLI
& ASSOCIATES
2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750
Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSVL011-STANDARD DETAILS.DWG 20251209.151938 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO.
OF REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERDARYL W. HE IGHER S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA No. C 62011
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT
JWD
RVL
DWH
ROSEVILLE STANDARD DETAILS 1
D19
SHEET
SCALE: WARNING
IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"
NOT TO SCALE.
THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED
DRAWN 0 1/2 1 DESIGNED
DOMENICHELLI
& ASSOCIATES
2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750
Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSVL011-STANDARD DETAILS.DWG 20251209.151938 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO.
OF REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERDARYL W. HE IGHER S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA No. C 62011
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT
JWD
RVL
DWH
ROSEVILLE STANDARD DETAILS 2
D2
10
SHEET
SCALE: WARNING
IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"
NOT TO SCALE.
THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED
DRAWN 0 1/2 1 DESIGNED
DOMENICHELLI
& ASSOCIATES
2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750
Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSVL011-STANDARD DETAILS.DWG 20251209.151938 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO.
OF REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERDARYL W. HE IGHER S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA No. C 62011
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT
JWD
RVL
DWH
ROSEVILLE STANDARD DETAILS 3
D3
11
1 3 5 NEW 24" DIP NEW 8" DIP 2 CONNECTION DETAIL 1C1 NTS CIRBY WAY STA 1+00 PARTS LIST: 1. 24"x8" TEE 2. 24" FLGxMJ ADAPTER 3. 24" PE SPOOL (5' MINIMUM LENGTH) 4 24" BFV 5. 8" FLGxMJ GV USE MEGALUG RESTRAINTS FOR ALL MJ FITTINGS 2 NEW 24" DIP 2 2 4NEW 72" MANHOLE CONNECTION TO EXISTING 24" PIPE (SEE NOTE 1) CONNECTION TO EXISTING 24" PIPE (SEE NOTE 1) 1 4 5 NEW 24" DIP NEW 8" DIP NEW 24" DIP 2 2 CONNECTION DETAIL 2C1 NTS CIRBY WAY STA 4+07 PARTS LIST: 1. 24"x8" TEE 2. 24" FLGxMJ ADAPTER 3. 24" PE SPOOL (5' MIN LENGTH) 4. 24" BFV 5. 8" FLGxMJ GV USE MEGALUG RESTRAINTS FOR ALL MJ FITTINGS 3 NEW 72" MANHOLE (E) REINF STEEL PIPE COAT CONNECTION EXTERIOR WITH MORTAR, MATCH EXISTING THICKNESS STEEL SLEEVE INSIDE OF (E) STEEL SURFACE 3/4" THICK FABRICATED STEEL FLANGE W/ OPENING TO MATCH (E) STEEL PIPE DIAMETER MINUS 14", BOLT PATTERN TO MATCH FCA COAT CONNECTION INTERIOR WITH MORTAR, MATCH EDGE OF NEW EXISTING INSIDE DIAMETER MORTAR SEE RENOVATION DETAIL 2 24" RESTRAINED FCA OR 24 IN RESTRAINED MECHANICAL JOINT X FLANGED DUCTILE IRON ADAPTER EXISTING PIPE NOTES: 1. DIP, HARDWARE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE COATED WITH A HEAVY FILM (40 MIL) OF BUTUMINOUS COATING (TNEMEC PERMA-SHIELD SERIES 431 OR EQUAL) CONNECTION DETAIL 3C1 NTS CIRBY WAY STA 1+67 & 5+37 SEE DEMOLITION DETAIL 1 CONNECTION DETAIL 6C1 NTS CIRBY WAY STA 5+37PARTS LIST: 1. 24" MJ SLEEVE USE MEGALUG RESTRAINTS FOR ALL MJ FITTINGS 1 NEW 24" DIP EX 24" DIP CUT, CAP AND ABANDON EX 24" PIPE. REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF PIPE AS NECESSARY. SHEET SCALE: WARNING IF THIS BAR DOES NOT MEASURE 1" NOT TO SCALE. THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED DRAWN 0 1/2 1 DESIGNED DOMENICHELLI & ASSOCIATES 2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750 Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSVL011-TIE-INS.DWG 20251119.145627 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO. OF REGISTERED PROFES IONAL ENGINEERDARYL W. HE IGHER S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA No. C 62011 CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT JWD RVL DWH TIE-IN DETAILS 1 T1 12 NOTES: 1. SEE NOTE 3 ON C1. DEPENDING ON PIPE MATERIAL FOUND, DETAIL 3 OR 6 MAY BE REQUIRED. NOTES: 1. DETAIL NOT USED IF EXISTING PIPE IS DUCTILE IRON. PIPE MATERIAL TO BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. NOTES: 1. DETAIL NOT USED IF EXISTING PIPE IS CONCRETE LINED AND COATED STEEL. PIPE MATERIAL TO BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2. EXISTING PIPE TO BE PLUGGED AND ABANDONED WITH EITHER PIPE MATERIAL.
1/4 1/4 1/4 FCA OR FLANGE X MJ ADAPTER NEW DIP 14"X6" ROLLED RING TO FIT INSIDE EXISTING STEEL CYLINDER 1" THICK FABRICATED FLANGE RING, MATCH DIP SUPPLIED 3 5 CONNECTION DETAIL 4C2 NTS PROMENADE STUB OUT STA 1+34 PARTS LIST: 1. 8" MJ PLUG 2. 8" PE SPOOL (MIN. 4' LENGTH) 3. 8" FLGXMJ ADAPTER 4. 8"x6" FLGXFLG TEE 5. 6" FLGxMJ GATE VALVE USE MEGALUG RESTRAINTS FOR ALL MJ FITTINGS 1 NEW 8" DIP NEW 6" DIP FH LATERAL 23 4 CONNECTION DETAIL 3C2 NTS INGLIS WAY STA 1+42 PARTS LIST: 1. 8"x6" ECCENTRIC REDUCER (FLAT SIDE UP) 2. 8"X8" TEE 3. 8" FLGxMJ ADAPTER 4. 6" FLG GATE VALVE 5. 6" FLGXMJ ADAPTER 6. 6" PE SPOOL (FIELD DETERMINE LENGTH) 7. 6" MJ SLEEVE USE MEGALUG RESTRAINTS FOR ALL MJ FITTINGS CUT AND ABANDON EX 6" PIPE, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF PIPE AS NECESSARY 13 1 5 6 7 4 CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY CONNECTION TYPE TO EX GATE VALVE 2 REMOVE EX 6" GATE VALVE PER CoR STANDARDS (TYP) NOTE 2 INSTALL 6" BLIND FLANGE CONNECTION DETAIL 5C3 NTS ABANDONMENT TIE-INPARTS LIST: 1. EXISTING 6" FLG TEE 2. 6" BLIND FLANGE USE MEGALUG RESTRAINTS FOR ALL MJ FITTINGS 2 1 REMOVE 9" OF (E) MORTAR LINING REMOVE 3" OF (E) MORTAR COATING SAW CUT LINE (E) 24" PIPE (FIELD VERIFY) (E) STEEL PIPE SHEET SCALE: WARNING IF THIS BAR DOES NOT MEASURE 1" NOT TO SCALE. THEN DRAWING IS CHECKED DRAWN 0 1/2 1 DESIGNED DOMENICHELLI & ASSOCIATES 2005 HILLTOP CIRCLE ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 PHONE: 916-774-5750 Z:\RSVL\RSVL-011 CIRBY SINKHOLE REPAIR\05_BID-DRAWINGS (WORKING)\RSVL011-TIE-INS.DWG 20251119.145627 REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DWG. NO. OF REGISTERED PROFES IONAL ENGINEERDARYL W. HE IGHER S CIVIL TATE OF CAL I FORNIA No. C 62011 CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT JWD RVL DWH TIE-IN DETAILS 2 T213 CONNECTION DETAIL 2T1 NTS RENOVATION DETAIL 1 CONNECTION DETAIL 1T1 NTS DEMOLITION DETAIL 1 NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING FACILITIES PRIOR TO FINAL ABANDONMENT. 2. CUT, CAP AND ABANDON EX 6" PIPE, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF PIPE AS NECESSARY. FILL PIPE WITH CLSM UNDER PAVED AREAS. PLUG END NOT UNDER PAVED AREA. NOTES: 1. DETAIL WILL NOT BE USED IF EXISTING PIPE IS DUCTILE IRON. PIPE MATERIAL TO BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. NOTES: 1. DETAIL WILL NOT BE USED IF EXISTING PIPE IS DUCTILE IRON. PIPE MATERIAL TO BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CONCRETE LINED AND COATED STEEL PIPE CONCRETE LINED AND COATED STEEL PIPE
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR
DESIGN-ASSIST CONSTRUCTION OF
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT
VOLUME 4 of 4:
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
RFP #08-158
INCLUDING:
Specifications for Construction
December 9, 2025
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH
MAIN REPLACEMENT
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
December 2025
Domenichelli & Associates, Inc.
5180 Golden Foothill Parkway
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT #08-158
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Section
Number Title
01 14 00 Work Restrictions
01 33 00 Submittal Procedures
01 50 00 Temporary Facilities and Controls
02 00 00 Site Conditions
02 00 70 Construction Photography
02 05 50 Clearing and Grubbing
02 07 50 Protection, Testing, and Restoration of Existing Facilities 02 20 00 Earthwork
02 49 10 Landscape Repairs
03 30 00 Cast In Place Concrete
03 34 00.13 Controlled Low Strength Material
03 60 00 Grout
07 90 00 Sealants
09 90 00 Painting
31 23 33 Trench Excavation Backfill Compaction
31 39 19 Geopolymer Injection
32 01 17 Pavement Restoration
33 00 00 Pipe and Pipe Fittings
33 01 90 Demolition and Abandonment
33 11 13.13 Ductile Iron Piping
33 12 13 Water Connections and Tie-Ins
33 13 00 Disinfecting Water Mains
33 13 10 Water Piping System Testing
40 05 61 Gate Valves
40 05 64 Butterfly Valves
APPENDICES
Appendix Letter Title
Appendix A Cirby Way Sinkholes Geotechnical Evaluation
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT #08-158
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
01 14 00 - 1
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT WORK RESTRICTIONS
PROJECT #08-158
SECTION 01 14 00
WORK RESTRICTIONS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.01 SUMMARY
A. Section includes:
1. Requirements for sequencing and scheduling the Work affected by existing site and facility, work restrictions, and coordination between construction operations and City operations.
B. Water projects:
1. Conduct Work such that the Owner’s ability to meet its customer's demands for treated drinking water shall not be impaired or reduced in terms of the required quantity or quality of treated water.
2. Do not impair the operational capabilities of essential elements of the water transmission system below levels sufficient to meet demands for water throughout the contract time.
1.02 LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON WORK SITE
A. Traffic Control:
1. During non-work hours, unless permitted otherwise by the City, in coordination with Public Works, the CONTRACTOR shall keep all lanes of traffic open and clear. All trenches shall be backfilled or covered with suitable steel plates and open to traffic.
B. No equipment, construction material, or excavated material that will interfere with traffic shall be stored on streets, sidewalks, trails, swales, drainages, or roadways at any time.
C. See Table 1 in 1.04 F for Working Hours.
1.03 SEQUENCE OF WORK
A. The CONTRACTOR shall schedule and sequence their work to complete the Work by the specified completion date.
B. The water distribution system at the work location is currently shutdown and not in use.
C. The OWNER’s water distribution, recycled water, sewer collection and storm drain systems must remain accessible and operational and Contractor shall provide temporary facilities required to keep the existing system continuously operational at all times, with scheduled shutdowns as necessary to complete the Work and with prior approval of Owner, as described herein.
D. Re-vegetation of disturbed areas shall take place as quickly as possible as work completion and weather permit, or temporary measures shall be installed and maintained at the Contractors sole expense.
1.04 PROJECT CONSTRAINTS
A. Maintenance of OWNER’s Operations:
01 14 00 - 2
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT WORK RESTRICTIONS
PROJECT #08-158
B. Constraints listed herein involve limits on activities during construction. These limits relate to the critical nature of the existing water system and all other services provided by the City and its franchisees.
C. Continuous operation of OWNER's facilities is of critical importance. Schedule and conduct activities to enable existing facilities to operate continuously, unless otherwise specified.
D. Work Plan:
a. The CONTRACTOR shall submit a detailed Work Plan and time schedule for all construction activities that will make it necessary to remove a tank, pipeline, electrical circuit, equipment, structure, road or other are replaced by temporary, new, or upgraded facilities from service, including the critical outages identified herein.
b. The Work Plan shall, at a minimum, identify:
1) The date and time when each activity will occur.
2) What equipment will be present including standby equipment. 3) What assistance will be required by OWNER’s operating personnel. 4) An emergency backup plan identifying what action will be taken if Work cannot be completed within the allotted time.
5) What individual will be in charge of the activity and their contact information. c. Submit Work Plan 10 working days prior to the scheduled activity.
2. Perform Work continuously during critical connections and changeovers, and as required to prevent interruption of OWNER's operations.
3. Shutdowns:
a. Coordinate proposed Work with OWNER and facility operations personnel (Water Distribution System Operators) before affecting unit shutdowns. The CONTRACTOR shall provide written confirmation of the shutdown date and time five working days prior to the actual shutdown.
b. Under no circumstances shall the CONTRACTOR cease Work at the end of a normal working day or at the end of a working week if such actions may inadvertently cause a cessation of any facility operating process, in which case, remain onsite until necessary repairs are complete.
4. Do not close lines, open valves or gates, shut down equipment, or take other action which would affect the operation of existing systems, except as specifically required by the Contract Documents and approved by the OWNER. After approval, CONTRACTOR shall proceed in the manner, action, and timing as submitted and approved.
5. Do not proceed with Work affecting a facility's operation without obtaining OWNER's advance approval of the need for and duration of such Work.
E. Relocation of Existing Facilities:
1. During construction, it is expected that minor relocations of Work will be necessary.
2. Provide complete relocation of existing structures and Underground Facilities, including piping, utilities, equipment, structures, electrical conduit wiring, electrical duct bank, and other necessary items.
3. Use only new materials for relocated facility. Match materials of existing facility, unless otherwise shown or specified.
4. Perform relocations to minimize downtime of existing facilities.
5. Install new portions of existing facilities in their relocated position prior to removal of existing facilities, unless otherwise accepted by OWNER.
01 14 00 - 3
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT WORK RESTRICTIONS
PROJECT #08-158
F. Hours of Work and Overtime:
a. Normal working hours at the Construction Site shall as shown on Table 1:
Working Hours, no work during City observed holidays.
b. Conduct Work outside normal working hours only after obtaining written consent and approval from the OWNER.
1) Contractor shall request work-hour variations in writing, a minimum of 10 days prior to the start of the proposed work period.
2) Contractor shall not rely on approval of work outside of normal working hours without prior consent of the OWNER. Approval shall be at the sole discretion of the OWNER.
c. Contractor shall develop a Project Schedule assuming work during working hours shown in Table 1: Working Hours.
Table 1: Working Hours
Activity Work Days Work
Hours
Estimated
Duration Lane Closure
Potholing
(approx. 30)
Week days
(day) 9am-3pm TBD Allowed to close the #1 west
Saturday and bound lane and center turn lane
Sunday 5pm-10pm TBD
Exploratory
Excavation (if
needed to locate
transmission
main)
Weekdays (day) 6am-2pm TBD
May do setup starting at 5am.
Close trenches at end of each
work day.
Pipeline
Construction
North side of
road
Weekdays (day) 6am-2pm TBD
Allowed to close the #1 west
bound lane and center turn
lane, OR close the 2
westbound lanes leaving a
portion of center lane open to
allow for having 1 west bound
and 2 east bound lanes open.
May do setup starting at 5am.
Close trenches at end of each
work day.
Saturday and
Sunday 5pm-10pm TBD
Pipeline
Construction
Center of
roadway
alignment
Weekdays 7AM-7PM TBD Drop k-rail on each side of
center lane. Traffic control can
take bike lanes on both north
and south side. Can leave
open trench
Saturday and
Sunday 8AM-8PM TBD
Tie-ins
Weekdays (day) 6am-2pm TBD Same as for pipeline
construction (not center of
roadway alignment) Saturday and
Sunday 5pm-10pm TBD
Pavement
replacement
Saturday and
Sunday 6am-8pm TBD May require full road closure
01 14 00 - 4
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT WORK RESTRICTIONS
PROJECT #08-158
Must keep one (1) west bound and two (2) east bound traffic lanes open at all times.
2. All overtime Work by the CONTRACTOR necessary to conform to the requirements of this Section and related Sections shall be performed by the CONTRACTOR, at no additional cost to the OWNER and shall be performed in accordance with the Agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall make no claims for extra compensation as a result thereof.
3. Contractor shall reimburse the City for its demonstrable additional internal and external labor and direct costs for supervising, inspecting, and providing any other City services during work conducted outside the normal working hours listed in C.1., above. In determining what effort and services are required, it will be the City’s sole determination what is required to accommodate the Contractor’s operation outside the normal working hours.
G. Site Area:
1. See also Agreement section 5.5.1 Designated Areas.
2. Contractor shall avoid disturbing ground and minimize disturbance to area residents whenever possible.
3. Contractor to identify and arrange required area for staging, storage, officing, parking, etc.
1.05 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING CONSTRAINTS
A. Shutdown activities:
1. Scheduling:
a. Perform during listed working hours and for only specific construction sequencing constraints annotated in the project schedule and as agreed upon during Final Design.
B. Construction sequencing constraints will be developed by Design-Assist Team as necessary.
1.06 PROJECT STAFFING
A. Project superintendent (Job Superintendent, serving as resident Superintendent and Contractor’s authorized representative), employed by the Contractor, shall be on-site five days per week for eight hours a day whenever construction activities are taking place.
B. When the Owner has turned the site over to the Contractor for construction, modification or temporary use, the Contractor is responsible for costs and procedures required to dewater and dispose of liquid, solids, etc. as required until the City has accepted the improvements for routine operation. Contractor shall provide adequate time in schedules for draining and cleanup.
1.07 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
A. CONTRACTOR responsible for stormwater management from the time the Contractor physically mobilizes to the site until the time the final stormwater BMPs are installed and Final completion has been approved by Owner.
B. City’s Stormwater Quality BMP Guidance Manual for Construction is available at the City’s website.
01 14 00 - 5
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT WORK RESTRICTIONS
PROJECT #08-158
1.08 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACCESS
A. Provide safe, continuous access to existing facilities for City personnel.
B. Provide access on one-hour advance notice to facilities for maintenance personnel and associated maintenance equipment.
1.09 UTILITIES
A. Provide advance notice to and utilize services of Underground Services Alert (U.S.A.) and appropriate local organizations for location and marking of underground utilities operated by utility agencies including the Owner.
B. New utilities were designed using existing drawings.
1. Field verification of utilities locations was not performed during design.
2. Services crossed by or located near new utilities may require relocation and possible shutdowns.
3. Pipes shall be installed as closely as possible to alignments indicated on the Drawings. Alignment deviations required due to pothole data shall be submitted to the Engineer for revision prior to construction. Contractor shall allow 14 calendar days for the Engineer to revise the construction documents.
1.10 WORK BY OTHERS
A. Where proper execution of the Work depends upon work by others, inspect and promptly report discrepancies and defects.
PART 2 - PRODUCTS (NOT USED)
PART 3 - EXECUTION (NOT USED)
END OF SECTION
01 14 00 - 6
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT WORK RESTRICTIONS
PROJECT #08-158
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
01 33 00 - 1
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PROJECT #08-158
SECTION 01 33 00
SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.01 SUMMARY
A. Section includes: Requirements and procedures for submittals to confirm compliance with Contract Documents.
1.02 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
A. Contractor is responsible to determine and verify field measurements, field construction criteria, materials, dimensions, catalog numbers and similar data, and check and coordinate each item with other applicable approved shop drawings and Contract Document requirements.
B. Provide submittals:
1. That are specified or reasonably required for construction, operation, and maintenance of the Work.
2. That demonstrate compliance with the Contract Documents.
C. Where multiple submittals are required, provide a separate submittal for each specification section.
1. In order to expedite construction, the Contractor may make more than 1 submittal per specification section, but a single submittal may not cover more than 1 specification section:
a. The only exception to this requirement is when 1 specification section covers the requirements for a component of equipment specified in another section. b. For example, circuit breakers are a component of switchgear. The switchgear submittal must also contain data for the associated circuit breakers, even though they are covered in a different specification section.
D. Prepare submittals in the English language. Do not include information in other languages.
E. Present measurements in customary American units (feet, inches, pounds, etc.).
F. Must be clear and legible, and of sufficient size for presentation of information.
G. Page size other than drawings:
1. Minimum page size will be 8 1/2 inches by 11 inches.
2. Maximum page size will be 11 inches by 17 inches.
H. Drawing sheet size:
1. Maximum sheets size: 22-inch by 34-inch.
a. Minimum plan scale: 1/8-inch equals 1 foot-0 inches. b. Minimum font size: 1/8 inch minimum.
2. 11-inch by 17-inch sheet:
a. Minimum plan scale: 1/8-inch equals 1 foot-0 inches. b. Minimum font size: 1/8 inch minimum.
I. If submittal is more than 80 pages, additionally provide hardcopy.
01 33 00 - 2
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PROJECT #08-158
J. Show dimensions, construction details, wiring diagrams, controls, manufacturers, catalog numbers, and all other pertinent details.
K. Provide submittal information from only 1 manufacturer for a specified product.
Submittals with multiple manufacturers for 1 product will be rejected without review.
1.03 SUBMITTAL ORGANIZATION
A. Organize submittals in exactly the same order as the items are referenced, listed, and/or organized in the specification section.
B. For submittals that cover multiple devices used in different areas under the same specification section, the submittal for the individual devices must list the area where the device is used.
C. Bookmarks:
1. Bookmarks shall match the table of contents.
2. Bookmark each section (tab) and heading.
3. Drawings: Bookmark at a minimum, each discipline, area designation, or appropriate division.
4. At file opening, display all levels of bookmarks as expanded.
D. Where applicable (i.e., except for drawings, figures, etc.) submittal content shall be electronically searchable utilizing the PDF file as submitted.
E. Thumbnails optimized for fast web viewing.
F. Sequentially number pages within the tabbed sections:
1. Submittals that are not fully indexed and tabbed with sequentially numbered pages, or are otherwise unacceptable, will be returned without review.
G. Attachments:
1. Specification section: Include with each submittal a copy of the relevant specification section.
a. Indicate in the left margin, next to each pertinent paragraph, either compliance with a check (√) or deviation with a consecutive number (1, 2, 3). b. Provide a list of all numbered deviations with a clear explanation and reason for the deviation.
2. Drawings: Include with each submittal a copy of the relevant Drawing, including relevant addendum updates.
a. Indicate either compliance with a check (√) or deviation with a consecutive number (1, 2, 3).
1) Provide a list of all numbered deviations with a clear explanation and reason for the deviation.
2) Provide field dimensions and relationship to adjacent or critical features of the Work or materials.
H. Contractor: Prepare submittal information in sufficient detail to show compliance with specified requirements.
1. Determine and verify quantities, field dimensions, product dimensions, specified design and performance criteria, materials, catalog numbers, and similar data.
2. Coordinate submittal with other submittals and with the requirements of the Contract Documents.
01 33 00 - 3
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PROJECT #08-158
3. Check, verify, and revise submittals as necessary to bring them into conformance with Contract Documents and actual field conditions.
I. Contractor: Prepare “Or Equal” submittal information.
1. Provide standard submittal requirements.
a. In addition, provide in sufficient detail to show reason for variance from specified product and impacts.
2. Provide reason the specified product is not being provided.
3. Explain the benefits to the Owner for accepting the “Or Equal”.
4. Itemized comparison of the proposed “Or Equal” with product specified including a list of significant variations:
a. Design features.
b. Design dimensions.
c. Installation requirements.
d. Operations and maintenance requirements.
e. Availability of maintenance services and sources of replacement materials.
5. Reference projects where the product has been successfully used:
a. Name and address of project.
b. Year of installation.
c. Year placed in operation.
d. Name of product installed.
e. Point of contact: Name and phone number.
6. Define impacts:
a. Impacts to other contracts.
b. Impacts to other work or products.
7. Contractor represents the following:
a. Contractor bears the burden of proof of the equivalency of the proposed “Or Equal”.
b. Proposed “Or Equal” is equal or superior to the specified product. c. Contractor will provide the warranties or bonds that would be provided on the specified product on the proposed “Or Equal”, unless Owner requires a Special Warranty.
d. Contractor will coordinate installation of accepted “Or Equal” into the Work and will be responsible for the costs to make changes as required to the Work.
e. Contractor waives rights to claim additional costs caused by proposed “Or Equal” which may subsequently become apparent.
J. Contractor: Prepare substitution submittal information.
1. Provide standard submittal requirements.
a. In addition, provide in sufficient detail to show reason for variance from specified product and impacts.
2. Provide reason the specified product is not being provided.
3. Explain the benefits to the Owner for accepting the substitution.
4. Itemized comparison of the proposed substitution with product specified including a list of significant variations:
a. Design features.
b. Design dimensions.
c. Installation requirements.
d. Operations and maintenance requirements.
e. Availability of maintenance services and sources of replacement materials.
01 33 00 - 4
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PROJECT #08-158
5. Reference projects where the product has been successfully used:
a. Name and address of project.
b. Year of installation.
c. Year placed in operation.
d. Name of product installed.
e. Point of contact: Name and phone number.
6. Define impacts:
a. Impacts to Contract Price.
1) Required license fees or royalties.
2) Do not include costs under separate contracts.
3) Do not include Engineer’s costs for redesign or revision of Contract Documents.
b. Impacts to Contract Time.
c. Impacts to Contract Scope.
d. Impacts to other contracts.
e. Impacts to other work or products.
7. Contractor represents the following:
a. Contractor shall pay associated costs for Engineer to evaluate the substitution.
b. Contractor bears the burden of proof of the equivalency of the proposed substitution.
c. Proposed substitution does not change the design intent and will have equal performance to the specified product.
d. Proposed substitution is equal or superior to the specified product. e. Contractor will provide the warranties or bonds that would be provided on the specified product on the proposed substitution, unless Owner requires a Special Warranty.
f. Contractor will coordinate installation of accepted substitution into the Work and will be responsible for the costs to make changes as required to the Work.
g. Contractor waives rights to claim additional costs caused by proposed substitution which may subsequently become apparent.
01 33 00 - 5
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PROJECT #08-158
1.04 SUBMITTAL METHOD AND FORMAT
A. Submittal identification numbering:
1. Number each submittal using the format defined below:
Spec Section Number Dash
Initial
Submittal -
Sequential
Number
Decimal
Point
Subsequent
Submittal
Revisions
Sequential
Number
Example 1
Description Cast-In-Place Concrete
8th initial
submittal
03 30 00 - 0008
Example 2
Description Cast-In-Place Concrete
8th initial
submittal
First revision
to the 8th initial
submittal
03 30 00 - 0008 . 1
B. Deliver submittals via email to Engineer at [email protected] unless another mutually agreeable method is designated. If submittal is greater than 80 pages, and the Engineer requests it, the Contractor shall mail one (1) hard copy of the submittal to the Engineer at:
Attn: Daryl Heigher Domenichelli & Associates
5180 Golden Foothill Parkway, Suite 220
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
C. Submittals in electronic media format:
1. General:
a. Provide all information in PC-compatible format using Windows® operating system as utilized by the Owner and Engineer.
2. Text:
a. Provide text documents and manufacturer’s literature in Portable Document Format (PDF).
3. Graphics:
a. Provide graphic submittals (drawings, diagrams, figures, etc.) utilizing Portable Document Format (PDF).
D. Submit the hardcopy submittal in the format provided in Attachment A - Contractor Submittal Transmittal Form.
1.05 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURE
A. Engineer: Review submittal and provide response:
1. Review description:
a. Engineer will be entitled to rely upon the accuracy or completeness of designs, calculations, or certifications made by licensed professionals accompanying a particular submittal whether or not a stamp or seal is required by Contract Documents or Laws and Regulations.
01 33 00 - 6
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PROJECT #08-158
b. Engineer's review of submittals shall not release Contractor from Contractor's responsibility for performance of requirements of Contract Documents.
Neither shall Engineer's review release Contractor from fulfilling purpose of installation nor from Contractor's liability to replace defective work. c. Engineer's review of shop drawings, samples, or test procedures will be only for conformance with design concepts and for compliance with information given in Contract Documents.
d. Engineer's review does not extend to:
1) Accuracy of dimensions, quantities, or performance of equipment and systems designed by Contractor.
2) Contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures except when specified, indicated on the Drawings, or required by Contract Documents.
3) Safety precautions or programs related to safety which shall remain the sole responsibility of the Contractor.
a) Engineer can Approve or Not Approve any exception at their sole discretion.
2. Review timeframe:
a. Except as may be provided in technical specifications, a submittal will be returned within 10 calendar days.
b. When a submittal cannot be returned within the specified period, Engineer will, within a reasonable time after receipt of the submittal, give notice of the date by which that submittal will be returned.
c. Engineer’s acceptance of progress schedule containing submittal review times less than those specified or agreed to in writing by Engineer will not constitute Engineer’s acceptance of review times.
d. Critical submittals:
1) Contractor will notify Engineer in writing that timely review of a submittal is critical to the progress of Work.
3. Schedule delays:
a. No adjustment of Contract Times or Contract Price will be allowed due to Engineer’s review of submittals, unless all of the following criteria are met:
1) Engineer has failed to review and return first submission within the agreed upon time frame.
2) Contractor demonstrates that delay in progress of Work is directly attributable to Engineer’s failure to return submittal within time indicated and accepted by Engineer.
4. Review response will be returned to Contractor with one of the following dispositions:
a. Approved:
1) No Exceptions:
a) There are no notations or comments on the submittal and the Contractor may release the equipment for production.
2) Make Corrections Noted - See Comments:
a) The Contractor may proceed with the Work, however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the final product. b) Resubmittal not required.
(i) Make Corrections Noted - Confirm:
01 33 00 - 7
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PROJECT #08-158
(a) The Contractor may proceed with the Work, however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the final product.
(b) Submit confirmation specifically addressing each notation or comment to the Engineer within 15 calendar days of the date of the Engineer’s transmittal requiring the confirmation. b. Not approved:
1) Correct and resubmit:
a) Contractor may not proceed with the Work described in the submittal. b) Contractor assumes responsibility for proceeding without approval. c) Resubmittal of complete submittal package is required within 30 calendar days of the date of the Engineer’s submittal review response. 2) Rejected - See Remarks:
a) Contractor may not proceed with the Work described in the submittal. b) The submittal does not meet the intent of the Contract Documents.
Resubmittal of complete submittal package is required with materials, equipment, methods, etc. that meet the requirements of the Contract Documents.
c. Receipt acknowledged - Filed for record:
1) This is used in acknowledging receipt of informational submittals that address means and methods of construction such as schedules and work plans, conformance test reports, health and safety plans, etc. d. Receipt acknowledged with comments - Resubmit:
1) This is used in acknowledging receipt of informational submittals that address means and methods of construction such as schedules and work plans, conformance test reports, health and safety plans, etc. Feedback regarding missing information, conflicting information, or other information that makes it incomplete can be made with comments.
B. Contractor: Prepare resubmittal, if applicable:
1. Clearly identify each correction or change made.
2. Include a response in writing to each of the Engineer’s comments or questions for submittal packages that are resubmitted in the order that the comments or questions were presented throughout the submittal and numbered consistent with the Engineer’s numbering.
a. Acceptable responses to Engineer’s comments are listed below:
1) “Incorporated” Engineer’s comment or change is accepted and appropriate changes are made.
2) “Response” Engineer’s comment not incorporated. Explain why comment is not accepted or requested change is not made. Explain how requirements will be satisfied in lieu of comment or change requested by Engineer.
3. Reviews and resubmittals:
a. Contractor shall provide resubmittals which include responses to all submittal review comments separately and at a level of detail commensurate with each comment.
b. Contractor responses shall indicate how the Contractor resolved the issue pertaining to each review comment. Responses such as “acknowledged” or “noted” are not acceptable.
01 33 00 - 8
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PROJECT #08-158
c. Resubmittals which do not comply with this requirement may be rejected and returned without review.
1) Contractor shall be allowed no extensions of any kind to any part of their contract due to the rejection of non-compliant submittals. 2) Submittal review comments not addressed by the Contractor in resubmittals shall continue to apply whether restated or not in subsequent reviews until adequately addressed by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the reviewing and approving authority.
d. Any resubmittal that does not contain responses to the Engineer’s previous comments shall be returned for Revision and Resubmittal. No further review by the Engineer will be performed until a response for previous comments has been received.
4. Resubmittal timeframe:
a. Contractor shall provide resubmittal within 15 days. b. When a resubmittal cannot be returned within the specified period, Contractor shall notify Engineer in writing.
5. Review costs:
a. Costs incurred by Owner as a result of additional reviews of a particular submittal after the second time it has been reviewed shall be borne by Contractor.
b. Reimbursement to Owner will be made by deducting such costs from Contractor's subsequent progress payments.
1.06 PRODUCT DATA
A. Edit submittals so that the submittal specifically applies to only the product furnished.
B. Neatly cross out all extraneous text, options, models, etc. that do not apply to the product being furnished, so that the information remaining is only applicable to the product being furnished.
1.07 SHOP DRAWINGS
A. Contractor to field verify elevation, coordinates, and pipe material for pipe tie-in to pipeline or structure prior to the preparation of shop drawings.
B. Indicate project designated equipment tag numbers for submittal of devices, equipment, and assemblies.
1.08 SAMPLES
A. Details:
1. Submit labeled samples.
2. Samples will not be returned.
3. Provide number of sample submittals as below:
a. Total: 2 minimum.
1) Owner: 1.
2) Engineer: 1.
3) Contractor: None.
01 33 00 - 9
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PROJECT #08-158
PART 2 - NOT USED.
PART 3 - NOT USED.
END OF SECTION
01 33 00 - 10
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PROJECT #08-158
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
01 33 00 - 1
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS PROJECT #08-158
SECTION 01 50 00
TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.01 SUMMARY
A. Section includes:
1. Furnishing, maintaining, and removing construction facilities and temporary controls, including temporary utilities, construction aids, barriers and enclosures, security, access roads, temporary controls, and removal after construction.
1.02 REFERENCE
A. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
1.03 SUBMITTALS
A. Submit as specified in Section 01 33 00 - Submittal Procedures.
1.04 TEMPORARY UTILITIES
A. Temporary electrical power:
1. Arrange with local utility to provide adequate temporary electrical service.
2. Provide and maintain adequate jobsite power distribution facilities conforming to applicable Laws and Regulations.
3. Provide, maintain, and pay for electric power for performance of the Work.
B. Temporary electrical lighting:
1. In work areas, provide temporary lighting sufficient to maintain lighting levels during working hours not less than lighting levels required by OSHA and state agency which administers OSHA regulations where Project is located.
2. When available, permanent lighting facilities may be used in lieu of temporary facilities:
a. Prior to Substantial Completion of the Work, replace bulbs, lamps, or tubes used by Contractor for lighting.
C. Temporary heating, cooling, and ventilating:
1. Heat and ventilate work areas to protect the Work from damage by freezing, high temperatures, weather, and to provide safe environment for workers.
D. Temporary water:
1. Pay for and construct facilities necessary to furnish potable water for human consumption and non-potable water for use during construction.
2. Temporary connections shall be properly protected with backflow devices per City Standards.
3. Remove temporary piping and connections and restore affected portions of the facility to original condition before Substantial Completion.
4. Pay for water used for construction prior to Substantial Completion.
E. Temporary sanitary facilities:
01 33 00 - 2
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS PROJECT #08-158
1. Provide suitable and adequate sanitary facilities that are in compliance with applicable Laws and Regulations.
2. Existing facility use is not allowed.
3. At completion of the Work, remove sanitary facilities and leave site in neat and sanitary condition.
F. Temporary fire protection:
1. Provide sufficient number of fire extinguishers of type and capacity required to protect the Work and ancillary facilities.
G. First aid:
1. Post first aid facilities and information posters conforming to requirements of OSHA and other applicable Laws and Regulations in readily accessible locations.
H. Utilities in existing facilities: As specified in Section 01 14 00 - Work Restrictions.
I. Temporary piping:
1. Submit layout drawings showing proposed routing of piping, including proposed pipe support and pipe restraint locations.
2. Submit product data for piping, fittings, appurtenances, restraints, supports, and other components of the temporary piping system.
3. Submit information at least 28 days prior to when each temporary piping system is scheduled to be installed and allow 14 days for review and comment.
1.05 CONSTRUCTION AIDS
A. Provide railings, kick plates, enclosures, safety devices, and controls required by Laws and Regulations and as required for adequate protection of life and property.
B. Use construction hoists, elevators, scaffolds, stages, shoring, and similar temporary facilities of ample size and capacity to adequately support and move loads.
C. Design temporary supports with adequate safety factor to ensure adequate load bearing capability:
1. When requested, submit design calculations by professional registered engineer prior to application of loads.
2. Submitted design calculations are for information and record purposes only.
D. Accident prevention:
1. Exercise precautions throughout construction for protection of persons and property.
2. Observe safety provisions of applicable Laws and Regulations.
3. Guard machinery and equipment, and eliminate other hazards.
4. Make reports required by authorities having jurisdiction, and permit safety inspections of the Work.
5. Before commencing construction work, take necessary action to comply with provisions for safety and accident prevention.
E. Barricades:
1. Place barriers at ends of excavations and along excavations to warn pedestrian and vehicular traffic of excavations.
2. Provide barriers with flashing lights after dark.
3. Keep barriers in place until excavations are entirely backfilled and compacted.
01 33 00 - 3
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS PROJECT #08-158
4. Barricade excavations to prevent persons from entering excavated areas in streets, roadways, parking lots, treatment plants, or other public or private areas.
F. Warning devices and barricades: Adequately identify and guard hazardous areas and conditions by visual warning devices and, where necessary, physical barriers:
1. Provide devices in accordance with minimum requirements of OSHA and State agency which administers OSHA regulations where Project is located.
G. Hazards in public right-of-way:
1. Comply with local jurisdiction standards and requirements for right-of-way barricades and other safety devices.
2. Mark at reasonable intervals, trenches, and other continuous excavations in public right-of-way, running parallel to general flow of traffic, with traffic cones, barricades, or other suitable visual markers during daylight hours:
a. During hours of darkness, provide markers with torches, flashers, or other adequate lights.
3. At intersections or for pits and similar excavations, where traffic may reasonably be expected to approach head on, protect excavations by continuous barricades:
a. During hours of darkness, provide warning lights at close intervals.
H. Hazards in protected areas: Mark or guard excavations in areas from which public is excluded, in manner appropriate for hazard.
I. Above grade protection: On multi-level structures, provide safety protection that meets requirements of OSHA and State agency which administers OSHA regulations where Project is located.
J. Protect existing structures, trees, shrubs, and other items to be preserved on Project site from injury, damage, or destruction by vehicles, equipment, worker or other agents with substantial barricades or other devices commensurate with hazards.
K. Fences:
1. Enclose site of the Work with fence adequate to protect the Work against acts of theft, violence, and vandalism.
2. When entire or part of site is to be permanently fenced, permanent fence may be built to serve for both permanent and temporary protection of the work site, provided that damaged or defaced fencing is replaced prior to Substantial Completion.
3. Protect temporary and permanent openings and close openings in existing fences to prevent intrusion by unauthorized persons.
a. Bear responsibility for protection of plant and material on site of the Work when openings in existing fences are not closed.
4. During night hours, weekends, holidays, and other times when no work is performed at site, provide temporary closures or enlist services of security guards to protect temporary openings.
5. Fence temporary openings when openings are no longer necessary.
1.06 SECURITY
A. Make adequate provision for protection of the work area against fire, theft, and vandalism, and for protection of public against exposure to injury.
1.07 ACCESS ROADS
A. General:
01 33 00 - 4
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS PROJECT #08-158
1. If required, build and maintain access roads to and on site of the Work to provide for delivery of material and for access to existing and operating plant facilities on site.
2. Build and maintain dust free roads which are suitable for travel at 20 miles per hour.
B. Off-site access roads:
1. Build and maintain graded earth roads.
2. Build roads only in public right-of-way or easements obtained by Owner.
3. Obtain rights-of-way or easements when electing to build along other alignment.
C. On-site access roads:
1. Maintain access roads to storage areas and other areas to which frequent access is required.
2. Maintain similar roads to existing facilities on site of the Work to provide access for maintenance and operation.
3. Protect buried vulnerable utilities under temporary roads with steel plates, wood planking, or bridges.
4. Maintain on-site access roads free of mud.
5. Provide controls to prevent vehicles leaving the site from tracking mud off the site onto the public right-of-way.
1.08 TEMPORARY CONTROLS
A. Dust control:
1. Prevent dust nuisance caused by operations, unpaved roads, excavation, backfilling, demolition, or other activities.
2. Control dust by sprinkling with water, use of dust palliatives, modification of operations, or other means acceptable to agencies having jurisdiction.
B. Noise control:
1. Comply with noise and work hours regulations by local jurisdiction. See Section 01 14 00 Work Restrictions for further information.
2. In or near inhabited areas, particularly residential, perform operations in manner to minimize noise.
3. In residential areas, take special measures to suppress noise during night hours.
C. Mud control:
1. Prevent mud nuisance caused by construction operations, unpaved roads, excavation, backfilling, demolition, or other activities.
1.09 REMOVAL
A. Remove temporary facilities and controls before inspection for Substantial Completion or when directed.
B. Clean and repair damage caused by installation or use of temporary facilities.
C. Remove underground installations to minimum depth of 24 inches and grade to match surrounding conditions.
D. Restore existing facilities used during construction to specified or original condition.
01 33 00 - 5
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS PROJECT #08-158
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.01 NOT USED.
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.01 NOT USED.
END OF SECTION
01 33 00 - 6
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS PROJECT #08-158
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
02 00 00 - 1
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SITE CONDITIONS
PROJECT #08-158
SECTION 02 00 00
SITE CONDITIONS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.01 SUMMARY
A. Section includes:
1. Weather Conditions
2. Elevation
3. Naturally Occurring Asbestos
1.02 WEATHER CONDITIONS
A. Below freezing conditions may exist during the winter months.
B. 100 degree plus temperatures exist during the summer months.
1.03 ELEVATION
A. Elevation at the site is approximately 150 feet.
1.04 NATURALLY OCCURRING ASBESTOS (NOA)
A. This project is located outside a quarter mile buffer zone more likely to contain asbestos or fault line.
B. Refer to Design-Assist Agreement, Section 5.6.5 – Asbestos Related Work, for additional requirements and responsibilities related to asbestos C. If while excavating the contractor sees any materials which appear to contain asbestos fibers, the Contractor is to stop excavation and report the findings to the City immediately.
END OF SECTION
02 00 00 - 2
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT SITE CONDITIONS
PROJECT #08-158
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
02 00 70 - 1
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHY PROJECT #08-158
SECTION 02 00 70
CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHY
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.01 DESCRIPTION
A. Construction photography as required to document:
1. Pre-construction conditions
2. Construction activities
3. Post-construction conditions.
B. Photographs will be particularly useful in documenting the pre-construction conditions of private properties, landscaping, streets, existing facilities, etc.
1.02 RELATED REQUIREMENTS
A. General Conditions
1.03 USE OF PHOTOGRAPHY
A. Pre-Construction photography will be used in part to establish pre-construction conditions. Disputes with property owners will be settled through the use of construction photos that will document pre-construction conditions. In the event that the Contractor fails to adequately document pre-construction conditions, the Contractor will be obligated to restore disputed landscaping, yards improvements, etc. to the satisfaction of the property owner.
B. Contractor shall provide a high-definition video of the work area prior to construction to document the condition of the roadways, driveways and other facilities along the construction corridor.
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.01 FORMAT
A. Format of the photography shall be as follows:
1. All photographs shall be in digital format (.jpg) with date stamp, delivered to the City on a USB device.
2. Photographs shall be color photos and be taken with a high-quality camera rated at a minimum of 16 megapixels.
3. Video shall be in digital format with date stamp on a USB device.
2.02 DATABASE
A. The photos shall be described in a table, (MS-Excel) that will be used for indexing digital photographs. The table shall have the following fields: address, pre-construction photographs (will be multiple records), construction photographs (will be multiple records), post-construction photographs (will be multiple records).
B. The Contractor shall populate the table fields indicated with links to the digital photos that correspond to each residence affected by the project as well as public rights-ofway as necessary.
02 00 70 - 2
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHY PROJECT #08-158
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.01 PRE-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION
A. Prior to construction, the Contractor will document the conditions of all surface features of the affected areas. This documentation shall be in the format as noted above.
B. The Contractor is obligated to document the Pre-Construction conditions sufficiently to avoid disputes with property owners and the City regarding the quality of postconstruction repairs.
C. The photographer shall use signs in each photograph that clearly identify each photo by lot number for properties and street name and station number for road work.
D. Pre-Construction video coverage shall include (at a minimum):
1. The ground surface above all pipes to be placed.
2. All driveways in the project vicinity which construction equipment may access.
3. All curb, gutter and road shoulders, and other surface features in the project vicinity that construction equipment might damage.
E. Submit one pre-construction video to the City prior to beginning construction. Video shall be labeled with the title, “Pre-Construction Video”, the name of the project, name of the Contractor, and date(s) of videotaping. The video photographer should include enough narrative to let a viewer know the time, date, and location of each separate area shown.
F. Pre-Construction photographs shall include a minimum of two photos from all residential properties that will be excavated. Photos should focus on areas that will be disturbed by the work.
G. Prior to the beginning of construction, the Contractor shall submit a USB device to the Engineer containing the following information:
1. Photography table with links to color photographs for each address. Only links to pre-construction photographs are required to be completed at this time.
3.02 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHS
A. The Contractor shall use construction photographs to document the progress of construction activities, unusual situations, repairs made to buried improvements, accidents, construction disputes, and any other conditions that may be useful in the future. The use of construction photographs should be for the Contractor’s benefit to document work completed.
B. The Contractor shall supply photographs each time a utility is exposed with location and details of the condition noted.
3.03 POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION
A. Provide Post-Construction photographs. Post-Construction photographs will include photos of the completed and repaired work areas. Photos will include enough detail to demonstrate that the Contractor has performed repair and clean-up work. At a minimum, each site that was photographed for a pre-construction photo shall be rephotographed for the post-construction documentation.
B. Following completion of construction, the Contractor shall submit to the City a USB device with the following information:
02 00 70 - 3
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHY PROJECT #08-158
1. Photography table with links to color photographs for each location. Links to preconstruction photographs, construction photographs, and post-construction photographs are all required to be completed at this time. This final submittal shall contain all photographs taken and is to replace all USB devices previously submitted to the City.
C. Post-Construction video shall be made that documents the post-construction conditions of the project sites. Again, the video should include footage of all areas shown in the pre-construction video. Also, the video should include any sensitive areas as indicated by property owner’s feedback and concerns.
D. Submit one copy of each post-construction video to the Engineer immediately following completion of the work and prior to the final payment. Video shall be labeled with title, “Post-Construction Video”, the name of the project, name of the Contractor, and date(s) of videotaping. The video photographer should include enough narrative to let a viewer know the time, date and location of each separate area shown.
END OF SECTION
02 00 70 - 4
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHY PROJECT #08-158
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
02-05-50 - 1
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT CLEARING AND GRUBBING PROJECT #08-158
SECTION 02 05 50
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.01 SUMMARY
A. Site preparation includes all clearing and grubbing Work.
1.02 JOB CONDITIONS
A. The Contractor shall determine the actual condition of the site as it affects the Work.
B. In General, the work will include:
1. Clearing and Grubbing.
2. The removal and disposal of any material, debris and appurtenances as required to complete the work.
1.03 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. General: All work shall be performed in accordance with the local building codes, State Industrial Safety Orders and requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act requirements.
B. Protect existing trees and other vegetation to remain against damage.
1. Do not smother trees by stockpiling construction materials or excavated materials within drip line.
2. Do not permit foot or vehicular traffic or parking of vehicles within drip line.
3. Provide temporary protection as required.
PART 2 - PRODUCTS (NOT USED)
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.01 GENERAL
A. The Contractor shall notify the Owner’s Representative when demolition is complete.
3.02 PERFORMANCE
A. Clearing and Grubbing
1. The site of all open-cut excavations and areas to be cleared, shall be cleared and grubbed prior to excavation.
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall remove obstructions such as brush, trees, logs, roots, root balls, heavy sod, vegetation, rock, stones larger than 6 inches in any dimension, broken or old concrete and pavement, debris, and structures.
b. Clearing and grubbing in areas of structural improvement such as concrete structures shall be cleared and grubbed as above except that obstructions larger than 2 inches in any dimension shall be removed.
3.03 SALVAGE
A. None
02-05-50 - 2
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT CLEARING AND GRUBBING PROJECT #08-158
3.04 REMOVED MATERIAL AND DEBRIS
A. Where Contractor is directed on the Drawings to “Demolish” or “Remove” material or facilities it is understood that the material will be removed and disposed of offsite unless specifically stated otherwise or directed by the Owner’s Representative.
B. All removed material and debris shall become the property of the Contractor and shall be removed from the site.
C. Materials and debris generated by demolition activities shall not be allowed to accumulate. Debris shall be removed daily and disposed of in a lawful manner.
3.05 RESTORATION
A. Restore adjacent structures and facilities damaged during construction to original or better condition.
END OF SECTION
02 07 50 - 1
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT PROTECTION, TESTING, AND PROJECT #08-158 RESTORATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES
SECTION 02 07 50
PROTECTION, TESTING, AND RESTORATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES PART 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1.01 SCOPE
A. This section is intended to include requirements associated with protection, testing, and restoration of existing facilities such as underground utilities, sprinkler systems, utility poles, surface improvements, and survey markers.
B. The Contractor shall provide all materials and equipment to accomplish the work described. Materials shall comply with the governing agency specifications.
1.02 NOTIFICATION OF UTILITIES
A. Utility Owners and the City of Roseville are to be contacted by the Contractor prior to any excavation activities requesting locations on underground utilities and services on a street by street basis. Should any apparent interferences exist, the Engineer shall be immediately notified.
B. Contractor shall utilize the services of Underground Service Alert (USA) and shall obtain a USA ticket and keep the ticket current during excavating. USA may be contacted at 1-800-227-2600.
C. In the event that a conflicting utility is damaged, the utility owner shall be notified immediately and given the opportunity to specify repair materials and methods.
1.03 PROTECTION OF FACILITIES
A. The Contractor shall take all necessary measures to avoid damage to existing surface and underground utility facilities in and near the site of the work. No error or omission on the drawings shall be construed to relieve the Contractor from his responsibility to protect all underground pipes, conduits, cables or other structures. The Contractor shall indemnify the City of Roseville and hold it harmless from any and all claims, demands, or liability made or asserted by any person or entity on account of, or in connection with any damage to such surface or underground facilities caused by the Contractor or any of his agents or subcontractors.
B. Exact locations and depths of all underground utilities shall be verified, by uncovering, prior to commencing any WORK activities. When such exploratory excavations show the underground utility locations as indicated in Contract Documents to be in error, the Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer in writing.
C. The drawings for the Work show the underground utilities on the site insofar as they are known to the City. The drawings may not show facilities apparent from visual inspection of the site or service laterals or appurtenances, the existence of which can be inferred from the presence of other visible facilities such as buildings, meters, junction boxes, etc., on or adjacent to the construction site.
D. The Contractor shall make the necessary arrangements to have a PG&E inspector verify the crossing of PG&E facilities. This includes, but is not limited to, notifying a PG&E inspector if the existing gas line being crossed has pre-existing or failing condition (e.g. coating delamination). Prior to backfill, the Contractor shall get the PG&E inspector’s authorization (e.g. written acknowledgement) that gas lines are in a satisfactory condition for backfill.
02 07 50 - 2
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT PROTECTION, TESTING, AND PROJECT #08-158 RESTORATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES
E. Any excavation within 5-feet of existing overhead utility poles requires notification of Roseville Electric and coordinate a minimum of 2-weeks in advance of doing the work.
Contact Joseph McKinney at (916) 241-6776.
1.04 INTERRUPTION TO UTILITIES
A. Where utilities are to be relocated, Contractor shall make proper application to the owners of the conflicting utilities and notify Engineer of specified time and conditions of necessitated WORK.
B. All restorations made to utilities shall be inspected and approved by an authorized representative of the utility before being concealed by backfill or other WORK.
C. No additional compensation for any breaks or other delays associated with working around existing utility lines (gas, water, sewer, irrigation, etc.) will be made. The Contractor assumes the responsibility to protect such utilities in their current condition and location and if damaged shall not claim loss of production nor seek reimbursement should the Contractor cause damage to the utility.
D. Contractor is responsible and assumes all liability to retain and protect all utility poles within or beyond the specified pay limit.
E. Contractor is responsible and assumes all liability to protect all curb, gutter, and drain inlets within or beyond the specified pay limit.
F. Contractor accepts responsibility for repair of utilities damaged during construction whether shown on the plans or not.
1.05 UNIDENTIFIED EXISTING UTILITIES
A. If, in the performance of the work, an existing facility is encountered which is not shown on the drawings and is not apparent or inferable from visual inspection of the site, the Inspector shall be notified immediately. The City will determine whether the drawings or specifications shall be modified, or whether existing utility shall be relocated or whether the Contractor shall work around the existing utility. If appropriate, the determination of the City shall be incorporated in a Change Order for extra work pursuant to the General Conditions.
1.06 PROTECTION OF SURVEY AND STREET MARKERS
A. Survey markers or other existing street markers shall not be destroyed, removed, or otherwise disturbed without proper authorization. No pavement breaking or excavation shall be started until all survey or other permanent marker points that will be disturbed by the construction operations have been properly referenced for easy and accurate restoration by the Contractor.
B. All survey markers or points disturbed, will be accurately restored by the Contractor after all WORK is complete. The Contractor is responsible to replace survey markers per the City of Roseville’s Design and Construction Standards and obtain approval from the City prior to final closeout of the project.
1.07 PROTECTION OF TREES
A. Any construction work within the dripline of any tree shall conform the following:
1. No tree shall be removed without the expressed written permission of the City and the property owner.
02 07 50 - 3
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT PROTECTION, TESTING, AND PROJECT #08-158 RESTORATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES
2. Hand excavation may be required to avoid damage to roots 2 inches in diameter and larger. Cutting or breaking roots 2 inches in diameter or larger may require trimming of the tree to the satisfaction of the property owner or City of Roseville.
1.08 DECORATIVE HARDSCAPE
A. The Contractor shall make their own observations of properties where decorative hardscape exists (e.g. stamped and/or colored concrete, pavers, rock, decorative curbing, decking) that may be impacted by the Contract work. Any decorative hardscape impacted shall be the Contractor’s sole responsibility to repair or replace the in-kind or better at no additional cost to the City. The Contractor shall coordinate with the property owner and make any necessary repairs or replacements to the property owner’s satisfaction. All costs for making such repairs or replacement shall be included in the Contract price.
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.01 REPLACEMENT IN KIND
A. Unless indicated otherwise or specifically authorized by a utility owner, reconstruct utilities with new material of the same size, type, and quality as that removed.
B. Unless indicated otherwise or specifically authorized in writing by the property owner, all repairs or replacement to landscape and hardscape on private property shall be of new material to in-kind or better materials.
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.01 GENERAL
A. Replace all improvements such as curbs and gutters, drain inlets, barricades, speed tables, traffic islands, signalization, fences, signs, etc. that are cut, removed, damaged, or otherwise disturbed by construction per the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards.
B. Where utilities are parallel to or cross the construction, but do not conflict with the permanent work to be constructed, follow the procedures given below and as indicated in the drawings. Notify the utility owner a minimum of 48 hours in advance of the crossing and coordinate the construction schedule with the utility owner's requirements.
C. Determine the true location and depth of utilities and service connections that may be affected by or affect the work by potholing the utility. Determine the type, material, and condition of these utilities. All investigative results shall be provided to the engineer a minimum of 14-days in advance in order to provide sufficient lead time to resolve unforeseen conflicts, order materials and take appropriate measures to ensure that there is no delay in the work.
3.02 PROCEDURES
A. Protect in place: Protect utilities in place, unless abandoned, and maintain the utility in service, unless otherwise specified.
B. Cut and Cap Ends: Cut abandoned utility lines and cap the ends. Legally dispose of cut pipe and other removed items.
02 07 50 - 4
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT PROTECTION, TESTING, AND PROJECT #08-158 RESTORATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES
C. Tees or outlets cut and capped on existing waterlines remaining in service will be subjected to the same leak standards as new pipe. Contractor shall account for thrust and pressure in the existing line when cutting and capping outlets.
D. Remove and Reconstruct:
1. Where indicated in the drawings, or as required by the City’s Representative, remove the utility and, after passage, reconstruct it with new materials. Provide temporary services for the disconnected utility.
3.03 COMPACTION
A. Utilities Protected in Place:
1. Contractor shall backfill and compact under and around the utility.
B. Sewer Crossing Procedures:
1. When crossing a sewer service, lateral or main the contractor shall protect the existing facility in place. Backfill material between the sewer service, lateral or main and the waterline shall be CLSM for 10ft each side of the pipe intersection unless specified otherwise in the plans. Any damaged sewer service, lateral or main shall be replaced per the City of Roseville’s Design and Construction Standards at the Contractor’s expense.
C. Alternative Construction, Sand Slurry:
1. Sand slurry consisting of one sack (94 pounds) of Portland cement per cubic yard of sand and sufficient moisture for workability may be substituted for other backfill materials to aid in reducing compaction difficulties. Submit specific methods and procedures for review and approval by the City’s Representative prior to construction.
3.04 LAWN/LANDSCAPE REPLACEMENT
A. Any lawns damaged by construction shall be replaced with nursery grown sod matching the existing grass type at no cost to the City. Every attempt shall be made to satisfy the property owner that the repair has been made to restore private property to pre-construction conditions. Seeding may be allowed on a case by case basis to achieve better match with existing grass, if adequate soil preparation is performed and watering arrangements are made with the owner.
B. All landscaping, including plants, flowers, and/or other vegetation damaged by construction shall be replaced or repaired at no cost to the City. Every attempt shall be made to satisfy the property owner that the repair has been made to restore private property to pre-construction conditions.
3.05 YARD STRUCTURES/HARDSCAPE
A. Any structures including driveways, fences, walkways, concrete, asphalt, pavers, decking, etc. damaged by construction shall be replaced or repaired at no cost to the City. Every attempt shall be made to satisfy the property owner that the repair or replacement has been made to restore private property to pre-construction conditions.
3.06 PAVEMENT AND STRIPING
A. All pavement and striping disturbed during the project shall be replaced in kind with the exception of minor residential streets, where striping can be replaced with standard
02 07 50 - 5
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT PROTECTION, TESTING, AND PROJECT #08-158 RESTORATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES
paint in lieu of thermoplastic striping. Pavement and striping within commercial areas shall be approved by the property owner.
B. Approvals shall be provided to the City in the form of a letter signed by the owner.
3.07 PRIVATE UTILITIES
A. All private utilities disturbed during the project such as irrigation systems, yard lighting systems, etc., shall be replaced or repaired at no cost to the City. Every attempt shall be made to satisfy the property owner that the repair has been made to restore private property to preconstruction conditions.
**END OF SECTION**
02 07 50 - 6
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT PROTECTION, TESTING, AND PROJECT #08-158 RESTORATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
02 20 00 - 1
CITY OF ROSEVILLE 12/09/2025
CIRBY WAY 24-INCH MAIN REPLACEMENT EARTHWORK
PROJECT #08-158
SECTION 02 20 00
EARTHWORK
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.01 SUMMARY
A. This section specifies earthwork activities consisting of excavation, filling, grading, and excess material control for non-trenching work.
B. Trenching: See Section 31 23 33 - Trench Excavation Backfill Compaction C. Naturally Occurring Asbestos: See Section 02 00 00 - Site Conditions
1.02 REFERENCES
A. The following documents are a part of this section insofar as they are specified and modified herein. In case of conflict between the requirements of this Section, and the following documents, the requirements of this section shall prevail.
Reference Title
California Test Method 217 Method of Test for Sand Equivalent ASTM C136 Method of Test for Sieve or Screen Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates
ASTM D420 Standard Recommended Practice for Investigating and Sampling Soil and Rock for Construction Purposes
ASTM D1556 Method of Test for Density of Soil in Place by the SandCone Method ASTM D1557 Method of Test for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils, Using 10 lb. (4.5 kg) Hammer and 18 in. (457 mm) Drop
ASTM D2049 Standard Test Method for Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils
ASTM D2922 Standard Test Method for Density of Soil and SoilAggregate in Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth) ASTM D2419 Standard Test Method for Sand Equivalent Value of Soils and Fine Aggregate
ASTM D3017 Method of Test for Moisture Content of Soil and Soil Aggregates in Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)
ASTM D4318 Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils
Caltrans Standard Specifications
1.03 DEFINITIONS
A. Compaction: The degree of compaction is specified as percent of relative compaction.
Relative compaction refers to the maximum relative densities of soil obtainable at optimum moisture content.