Roseville City Council
September 16, 2026

City Council Chambers, 311 Vernon Street roseville.ca.gov The City of Roseville welcomes your participation.

Meeting Schedule: Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the first and third Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m.

Public Comment - Non-Agenda Items: A total of 25 minutes is allotted for public comments. Each speaker has three (3) minutes to address the Mayor on issues not on the agenda and within the City’s jurisdiction. Please submit a yellow speaker card to the City Clerk before the item is heard. You will still have an opportunity to comment if you haven’t filled out a yellow speaker card. Under the Brown Act, the City Council cannot discuss or act on items not listed on the agenda.

Public Comment - Agenda Items: Speakers have three (3) minutes on regular agenda items and five (5) minutes on public hearing items. Emailed comments will be made part of the permanent record.

Email [email protected] no later than 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting with Public Comment in the subject line.

Americans with Disabilities Act/Interpreters: If special assistance is required to participate in a meeting, including the need of auxiliary aids or services or assistance with interpreter services, please notify the City Clerk at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.

City Clerk 311 Vernon Street [email protected] 916-774-5263 TDD: 916-774-5220 Security Measures: All attendees must pass through a metal detector. Prohibited items – including firearms (even with valid CCW), knives, pepper spray/mace, explosives, weapons, dangerous devices of any kind, illegal drugs, and alcohol – are not allowed.

Viewing Options: In addition to the viewing options below, audio/visual comments can be made via:

Teams.

Meeting ID: 223 741 685 370 862
Passcode: hH7xa3QA
Click: Continue on this browser
Click: Join now
Attendees will enter the meeting muted and with no camera accessibility. Once attendee is recognized to speak, attendee will have the microphone enabled and has the option to enable their camera.

Teams participation by telephone (audio only)

1. Dial (213) 282-6642

2. Conference ID: 253 584 545#

3. To make a public comment, press *5 to “raise your hand” To unmute yourself press *6

Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
September 16, 2026
6:00 PM
City Council Chambers, 311 Vernon Street
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
V. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is an opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.

VI. CONSENT CALENDAR

1. The Courts at Gibson Park Frontage Improvement Project - Notice of Completion (PARKS,

RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Courts at Gibson Park – Frontage Improvement Project. The total cost of the construction contract with Frontline General Engineering, Inc. is $473,532. Funding for this project was approved using the Citywide Park Fund in The Courts at Gibson Park - Frontage Capital Improvement Project budget.

Additional funds were allocated from the General Fund using the FY2023-24 year-end budget surplus and the General Fund Capital Reserve Fund.

CONTACT: Josh Cervantes 916-746-1233 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-346 accepting the Public Work known as The Courts at Gibson Park - Frontage Improvement Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

2. Roseville Aquatics Complex Renovation Project - Award of Agreement (PARKS, RECREATION,

AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)

Summary: Staff recommends approval of an agreement with J-Walt Construction, Inc., in the amount of $2,266,000 to renovate the Roseville Aquatics Complex which will include replastering of the competition pool and upgrades to the locker rooms and restrooms. Additive alternates include mechanical pit wall repairs, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning improvements to the classroom, sports lighting replacements, additional plumbing improvements, door closer replacements, and replacement of the pool surge pit cover. Funding for renovation of this aquatic facility was provided by fiscal year 2024-25 General Fund year-end budget surplus appropriated in the FY2026-27 budget to the Roseville Aquatics Complex Renovations Project in the Parks Recreation and Library Capital Projects Fund. There will be no increase in General Fund maintenance costs.

CONTACT: Heather Buck 916-774-5254 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-333 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and J-Walt Construction, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

3. Del Stephenson Park Play Structure Replacement - Contract Purchase Agreement (PARKS,

RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Playpower LT Farmington, Inc. c/o All About Play, Inc. for the Del Stephenson Park play structure replacement in the amount of $189,416.44. Funding and maintenance for the play structure replacement is through the Highland Reserve North Community Facilities District No. 2 (Services District). There will be no General Fund impact.

CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-340 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Playpower LT Farmington, Inc. c/o All About Play, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

4. Summerhill Park Play Structure Replacement Project - Contract Purchase Agreement (PARKS,

RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Playpower LT Farmington, Inc. c/o All About Play for Summerhill Park play structure replacement in the amount of $190,000. Funding for this project was approved by Council in FY2025-26. The Summerhill Park play structure replacement project is funded through the Parks, Recreation & Library Capital Projects Fund. There will be no additional General Fund impact.

CONTACT: Josh Cervantes 916-746-1233 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-341 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Playpower LT Farmington, Inc. c/o All About Play, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

5. Water Services - Sole Source Purchase Order (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES

DEPARTMENT - ADMINISTRATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source open purchase order including four (4) additional one-year renewals with Placer County Water Agency for water services to Roseville customers in Stoneridge Specific Plan. Placer County Water Agency is the sole supplier of water services in portions of the Stoneridge Specific Plan. The total cost of the purchase order is not to exceed $764,000 over five years. Funding will be provided from the annual budgets of the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department in the General Fund and Stoneridge Community Facilities District No. 1 (Services District).

CONTACT: Anita Kwong 916-774-5243 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-334 approving a sole source purchase order for water services.

6. Maidu Museum and Historic Site Exhibit Refresh Project - Professional Design Services Agreement (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - LIBRARY) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional design services agreement with Lord Cultural Resources Planning & Management Inc. in the amount of $255,206 to provide design services for the internal exhibit space at the Maidu Museum and Historic Site. Funding was appropriated in the FY2025-26 Capital Improvement Project budget to the Maidu Museum and Historic Site Exhibit Refresh Project in the Parks, Recreation & Library Capital Projects Fund.

CONTACT: Narinderpal Sufi 916-774-5234 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-335 approving a professional design services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Lord Cultural Resources Planning & Management Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

7. Stone Point Community Facilities District No. 5 Parks Rehabilitation - New Capital Improvement Project and Budget Adjustment (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES

DEPARTMENT - PARK MAINTENANCE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment of $155,357 for the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – Stone Point Communities Facilities District 5 Parks Rehabilitation. Funding is provided by available resources in the Stone Point Community Facilities District No. 5 Capital Fund.

CONTACT: Brian Castelluccio 916-746-1755 [email protected]

The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – Stone Point Community Facilities District 5 Parks Rehabilitation; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7103 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2026-27 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.

8. North Roseville Community Facilities District 1 Park Rehabilitation - New Capital Improvement Project and Budget Adjustment (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK

MAINTENANCE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment of $133,530 for the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – North Roseville Community Facilities District 1 Park Rehabilitation. Funding is provided by available resources in the North Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1 Fund. There will be no General Fund impact.

CONTACT: Brian Castelluccio 916-746-1755 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – North Roseville Community Facilities District 1 Park Rehabilitation; and b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7104 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2026-27 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.

9. California Independent System Operator Extended Day Ahead Market – Onboarding Agreements (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - RESOURCE PLANNING & GENERATION) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) Extended Day-Ahead Market (EDAM) agreements, which include the EDAM Load Serving Entity Agreement, the EDAM Addendum to the Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Participating Resource Agreement, and the EDAM Addendum to the EIM Participating Resource Scheduling Coordinator Agreement, that are required for Roseville Electric Utility’s onboarding and registration for planned EDAM participation in 2027. There is no fiscal impact associated with the EDAM onboarding and application process. Roseville’s existing participation in the Western EIM satisfies the applicable CAISO application requirements, and no additional application fee is required.

CONTACT: Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-344 approving the California Independent System Operator Extended Day-Ahead Market agreements.

10. Energy Risk Management Policies Update (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - FINANCIAL &

ADMINISTRATIVE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of updates to the Energy Credit Risk Policy and Energy Trading Authority Policy, and reaffirming the Energy Risk Management Policy and Energy Hedge Policy. The recommended updates clarify existing risk management controls for Roseville Electric Utility and do not expand trading authority, increase credit approval limits, or change the City’s risk appetite. There is no fiscal impact associated with these policy changes.

CONTACT: Glenn Hoffman 916-746-1670 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-345 reaffirming the Energy Risk Management Policy and Energy Hedge Policy, and adopting the Energy Credit Risk Policy and Energy Trading Authority Policy.

11. Electric Utility Wildfire Mitigation Plan and Independent Evaluator Report (ELECTRIC

DEPARTMENT - DISTRIBUTION & OPERATIONS)
Summary: Staff recommends accepance of the Roseville Electric Utility (REU) 2026-2029 Wildfire Mitigation Plan (WMP) and accompanying Independent Evaluator Report. The WMP outlines REU's programs and practices to reduce wildfire risk, protect public and employee safety, and maintain the reliability of Roseville's electric system in accordance with California Public Utilities Code section 8387. Beginning in 2026, state law requires publicly owned electric utilities to submit a WMP to the California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board at least once every four years according to an established schedule. REU is included in the 2026 reporting cycle. While REU remains outside CPUC-designated Tier 2 and Tier 3 High Fire-Threat Districts, the WMP incorporates updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone mapping and associated monitoring and inspection activities. Charles River Associates independently evaluated the Plan and concluded that it meets the statutory requirements for comprehensiveness. There is no cost associated with the City Council's acceptance of the 2026-2029 Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

CONTACT: Tom Pontes 916-774-5550 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Accept the Roseville Electric Utility 2026–2029 Wildfire Mitigation Plan and accompanying Independent Evaluator Report; and
b. Authorize staff to submit the approved Plan and related materials to the California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board in accordance with applicable state requirements.

12. Electric Generation Vapor Compressor – Sole Source Purchase Order (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT -

RESOURCE PLANNING & GENERATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a Sole Source Purchase Order with American Compressor Company in the amount of $341,314.92 to provide two (2) Howden Roots manufactured rotary lobe vapor compressors for onsite backup inventory replacing the prior

backup inventory which are now in service. Funding is included in the Electric Department’s Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget in the Electric Fund.

CONTACT: Nathan Ribordy, Steve Hancock 916-746-1673, 916-774-5631 [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve a sole source purchase order with American Compressor Company.

13. Renewable Energy Credits Power Purchase Agreement (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - RESOURCE

PLANNING & GENERATION)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the attached Renewable Energy purchase through a long-term Power Purchase Agreement with Shell Energy North America, L.P. The annual cost of the power purchase agreement is $3,175,000. Future funding will be included in the Electric Department's future Electric Fund budgets and are subject to the approval of City Council. This recommendation has no impact on the General Fund.

CONTACT: Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-348 approving a power purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Shell Energy North America (US), L.P. and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

14. Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Fence and Landscaping Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING - CITY PROJECTS) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a construction agreement with Ornamental Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $325,388 for the construction of the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Fence and Landscaping Project, and approval of a budget adjustment to fully fund the construction and construction management services to closeout the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Trail Project in the amount of $760,000 from the Local Transportation Fund. The scope of the Fence and Landscaping project includes construction of an 8-foot-tall steel and redwood fence, landscaping and irrigation along the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Trail west of Sunrise Avenue. Work is expected to begin in summer 2026 and be completed by early 2027.

Staff also recommends approval for change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed 15% of the contract price.

The project is funded with Local Transportation Funds. No General Fund resources will be used for the project.

CONTACT: Samuel Benjamin 916-746-1305 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-337 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville

and Ornamental Solutions, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7105 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2026-27 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.

15. Storm Drain Repair Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment (PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING - CITY PROJECTS)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a construction agreement with BRCO Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $1,451,905 for the Storm Drain Repair Project, and approval of a budget adjustment to fully fund construction in the amount of $860,000 from the Highway Users Tax Fund. The project will include the rehabilitation of existing drainage systems and construction of new drainage systems. Staff also requests approval for change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed 10% of the contract price. The project is funded by the General Fund ($1,450,000) and Highway User Tax Fund ($910,000 with the recommended budget adjustment). Work is expected to begin in September 2026 and be completed by summer 2027.

CONTACT: Joseph Arino 916-774-5460 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-342 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and BRCO Constructors, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7107 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2026-27 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.

16. Cirby Way Water Pipeline Repair Project (RFP #08-158) - Design-Assist Construction Agreement & Budget Adjustment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WATER) Summary: Staff recommends approval and award of a design-assist construction agreement to Preston Pipelines Infrastructure LLC for the Cirby Way 24-Inch Main Replacement Project in the amount of $3,677,500 and authorization for the Environmental Utilities Director or his designee to approve and pay for contract change orders that could increase the contract amount by no more than 10 percent or $367,750. This item also requests approval of construction plans, specifications, and a budget adjustment of $4,780,000 from the Water Rehabilitation Fund to increase the total project budget to $4,950,000
CONTACT: Jose Bygoytia-Amaya 916-774-5754 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-338 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Preston Pipelines Infrastructure, LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and

b. Approve the project’s construction plans and specifications; and c. Adopt Ordinance No. 7106 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2026-27 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.

17. North Central Roseville Specific Plan Parcel 42C - Shea Apartments Easement Abandonment (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the summary vacation of an existing 15-foot-wide water line easement and an existing 16-foot-wide sewer line easement for an apartment project located at 572 Gibson Drive, and to authorize the City Manager to execute any related documents necessary to facilitate the summary vacation. These actions have no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.

CONTACT: Kinarik Shallago 916-746-1309 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-343 ordering summary vacation of public utility easements at 572 Gibson Drive.

18. Community Facilities District No. 4 (Public Services), Annexation 11 (Oak Leaf Estates) - Intention to Annex Territory (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory to Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 4 (Public Services) and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein, and set Wednesday, October 21, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Roseville Civic Center Council Chambers at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California, as the time and place to conduct a public hearing. On September 12, 2024, the Planning Commission approved a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide Infill Parcel 13, an existing 4.24-acre parcel, into 17 residential lots and adopted the Oakleaf Estates Subdivision Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Per the conditions of approval, the subject property shall be annexed into the existing CFD No. 4 (Public Services) prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map to fund ongoing maintenance obligations. The annexation of the property into infill CFD No. 4, will not impact the City's General Fund. The property owners will pay an annual special tax to fund the applicable CFD maintenance costs.

CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-347 a Resolution of Intention to annex territory to Community Facilities District and to authorize the Levy of Special Taxes therein.

19. Cybersecurity Endpoint Detection and Response Subscription and Support - Contract Purchase Agreement (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS)

Summary: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order with ePlus Technology Inc. for renewal of Cybersecurity Endpoint Detection and Response subscription and support, and the annual estimated cost of the agreement is $168,148.23 per year, plus a 10% contingency each year. Funding is included in the FY2026-27 Information Technology Operations Fund budget and the Public Works Department's traffic signal budgets in the Electric Fund.

CONTACT: Cesar Gamez 916-774-5408 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-330 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and ePlus Technology Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

20. Multi-Function Printers - Contract Purchase Agreement (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

DEPARTMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement renewal with Flex Technology Group LLC, dba FlexTG LLC, to provide copier lease and printing services. As part of the agreement, the City is required to execute leases with a third party to receive the multifunctional printers. The annual cost of the one-year agreement will not exceed $400,000.

Funding is included in the FY2026-27 operating budgets for City departments in the General Fund, enterprise funds, and internal service funds.

CONTACT: Matthew Sweet 916-774-5111 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-339 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Flex Technology Group LLC, dba FlexTG LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

21. Time and Attendance Software - Contract Purchase Agreement (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

DEPARTMENT - CLIENT SERVICES)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with WorkForce Software, LLC in an amount not to exceed $85,085.88 to provide for the annual renewal of the City’s enterprise time and attendance platform. The proposed renewal will continue these services for a 12-month period beginning October 1, 2026, in accordance with the City’s Request for Proposal 400-001 and existing WorkForce Software SaaS Agreement. The annual renewal amount is $83,085.88, with an additional amount not to exceed $2,000 for licensing overages, if needed. Funding is included in the Information Technology Operations Fund budget.

CONTACT: Melissa Patrick 916-774-5127 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-329 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the

City of Roseville and WorkForce Software, LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

22. All Band Portable Radio - Sole Source Purchase Order (POLICE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source purchase order with Motorola Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $501,037.50 to provide All Band Portable Radios. Motorola Solutions, Inc. is the manufacturer of the APX 8000 All Band Protable Radio, which contains proprietary hardware and software components that are only available through Motorola. Funding for this purchase was included in the adopted FY2026-27 budget in the Police Portable Radio Replacement project in the Equipment Replacement Fund.

CONTACT: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve a sole source purchase order to Motorola Solutions, Inc. for the purchase of 50 All Band Portable Radios.

23. Annual Ammunition - Sole Source Purchase Orders (POLICE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of sole source purchase orders with Miwall Corporation & San Diego Police Supply in the amount of $131,387.54 and San Diego Police Equipment in the amount of $96,001.06, for a combined total of $227,388.60 to provide Police Duty Ammunition.

Miwall Corporation is the exclusive distributor for Hornady 9mm ammunition and San Diego Police is the exclusive distributor for Speer .223 and Federal .308 ammunition. Funding in the amount of $218,926.33 is included in the Police Department's budget in the General Fund; the remaining amount of $8,462.27 is included in the Police Department's budget in the Forfeited Property Fund.

CONTACT: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve a sole source purchase orders with Miwall Corporation

24. Second Reading - Massage Business Operating Requirements - Municipal Code Amendment (CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council approve an ordinance for second reading amending Section 9.10.220 of Chapter 9.10 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding massage business operating requirements. The proposed revision to Section 9.10.220 builds upon changes adopted by City Council in 2024 and 2025. Specifically, this change would reduce the authorized operating hours for massage businesses from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., to 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. This timeframe is more aligned with the actual operating hours of the majority of the massage businesses within the City, and will also help abate issues associated with illicit massage business activity. There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the proposed ordinance, although the proposed changes may lead to higher numbers of administrative citations being issued for violations and/or more successful collection of the corresponding fines.

CONTACT: Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7108 amending Section 9.10.220 of Chapter 9.10 of Title 19 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding massage services.

25. Proclamation - Roseville the Entrepreneurial
Summary: Proclaim that the City of Roseville will join “America the Entrepreneurial” and take actions to encourage and celebrate entrepreneurs across our city throughout 2026.

CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]

26. Proclamation - National Adult Education & Family Literacy Week Summary: Proclaim September 13-19, 2026, as National Adult Education & Family Literacy Week, and encourage all residents to recognize the value of adult education, celebrate the achievements of adult learners, and support the programs and educators who create pathways to opportunity for individuals, families, employers, and our community.

CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]

27. Proclamation - National Rehabilitation Awareness Week Summary: Proclaim September 14-20, 2026, as National Rehabilitation Awareness Week and encourage residents to recognize the value of rehabilitation in creating a healthier, safer, more accessible, and more inclusive community.

CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]

28. Minutes of Prior Meetings (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the September 2, 2026 City Council Closed Session Meeting and City Council Meeting.

CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve minutes of the September 2, 2026 City Council Closed Session Meeting and City Council Meeting.

29. 400 Lincoln Street - Ground Lease Amendment (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval to execute an Amendment to a ground lease for continuation of public parking at 400 Lincoln Street, a privately owned parking lot, for a 14- month term with the option to extend on a month-to-month basis at a recommended lease rate of $7,067 per month. Funding for the continuation of the lease will be from the General Fund contingency budget for FY2026-27 and will be included in the proposed FY2027-28 budget.

CONTACT: Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-349 approving a First Amendment to Ground Lease, by and between Mr. Richard Ryan and the City of Roseville, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VII. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS

30. Council Discretionary Funds — Reece Booster Club/Beale Air Force Base (CITY MANAGER

DEPARTMENT - CITY MANAGER)
Summary: Staff recommends City Council consider providing a $500 sponsorship to Reece Booster Club alongside Beale Air Force Base for their upcoming Air Force Ball Event. The balance remaining in the Council Discretionary funds in the Citizens' Benefit Fund for FY2026-27 is $17,522. There is no fiscal impact on the City’s General Fund.

CONTACT: Amy Ruiz 916-746-1362 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Consider providing a $500 sponsorship to Reece Booster Club for its Air Force Ball event dedicated to honoring the history and service of the United States Air Force.

31. Council Discretionary Funds - The Gathering Inn (CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT - CITY

MANAGER)
Summary: Staff recommends City Council consider providing sponsorship to The Gathering Inn for their annual Gathering for Hope Event. This year's event will take place on November 6, 2026, at the Rocklin Event Center. The City has funded prior events in the amount of $3,000. The balance in the Council Discretionary funds in the Citizens' Benefit Fund for FY2026-27 is $17,522.

There is no fiscal impact on the City’s General Fund.

CONTACT: Amy Ruiz 916-746-1362 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Consider providing a sponsorship to The Gathering Inn from Council Discretionary Funds for the annual Gathering for Hope 2026 event.

VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Public Hearing Process
City Council, when considering the matter, will take the following actions:

1. Open the Public Hearing

2. Presentation by staff

3. Presentation by applicant or appellant

4. Accept public testimony

5. Appellant or applicant rebuttal period

6. Close the Public Hearing

7. City Council comments and questions

8. City Council action
Any challenges in court about public hearing matters noticed on this agenda may be limited to only those issues, that were raised orally at the public hearing or in written form received by the City on or before the hearing.

Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued and posting of this agenda will serve as notice of continuation.

32. Community Development Block Grant 2025 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the 2025 Program Year Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report and authorize the City Manager to execute necessary documents and certifications on behalf of the City for submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development. As an entitlement jurisdiction, the City receives federal Community Development Block Grant funds. The grant is used to offset potential costs to the General Fund and to serve the community. This item does not impact the City's General Fund.

CONTACT: Danielle Calli 916-774-5277 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-332 approving the 2025 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2025 CAPER to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.

33. 505 Royer and 300 Taylor - Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the sale of two city-owned parcels at 505 Royer Street (APN 013-290-005-000) and 300 Taylor Street (013-290-006-000) to Eden Housing, Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, in the amount of $580,000 (consistent with Municipal Code Section 4.12.110B). The City Council determined that disposition of the property was in the City’s best interest and declared the property surplus on October 23, 2019. The City Council subsequently reaffirmed the City’s interest in the property in 2022 and will again consider whether disposition remains in the City’s best interest. The subject parcels total 1.17 acres and are proposed for an affordable housing development. Escrow will close no later than January 31, 2027, as outlined in the Joint Escrow Instructions. The proceeds from the property sale (totaling $580,000 less escrow fees and taxes) will be deposited into the City’s Strategic Improvement Fund in FY2026-27 based on the anticipated close of the escrow date. No General Fund resources will be used as part of this project.

CONTACT: Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-331 approving a purchase and sale agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Eden Housing, Inc. (“purchaser”), and authorizing the City Manager execute the agreement and all related documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

34. Sierra Vista Specific Plan JM-30 Sierra Vista Apartments Fee Deferral (ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a fee deferral for the Sierra Vista Apartments, a 192- unit affordable multi-family apartment development, in the amount of approximately $2,987,339, until final of building permit/building occupancy. An annual interest rate equivalent to the city's pooled interest rate, prorated based on the length of the deferral, will be charged on the monies deferred to cover the City's cost of loss of interest income on the fee deferrals and an administrative processing fee is to be charged to each building permit.

CONTACT: Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-336 approving a fee deferral for the JM-30 Sierra Vista Apartments Project.

IX. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
X. ADJOURNMENT

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.1
File #: 0704-01
Item ID: 2026-671
Title: The Courts at Gibson Park Frontage Improvement Project - Notice of Completion Contact: Josh Cervantes 916-746-1233 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Courts at Gibson Park – Frontage Improvement Project. The total cost of the construction contract with Frontline General Engineering, Inc. is $473,532. Funding for this project was approved using the Citywide Park Fund in The Courts at Gibson Park - Frontage Capital Improvement Project budget. Additional funds were allocated from the General Fund using the FY2023-24 year-end budget surplus and the General Fund Capital Reserve Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting The Courts at Gibson Park - Frontage Improvement Project as complete and authorizing the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Courts at Gibson Park - Frontage Improvement Project is located on a 13.75-acre site at the corner of Roseville Parkway and Gibson Drive, near the Galleria Mall. The first phase of this Project was completed in January 2024 and included 9 lighted pickle ball courts and support features.

The Courts at Gibson Park - Frontage Improvement Project included new landscaping, irrigation, decorative boulders, and dry creek bed features along the frontage side of Roseville Parkway and Gibson Drive and improved entrance ramps to 3 pickleball courts. This project also added new 8-foot-wide concrete sidewalks along Roseville Parkway and Gibson Drive, and an ADA-accessible ramp at the corner of Roseville Parkway and Gibson Drive.

Council approved the award of the contract at the November 5, 2025, City Council Meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of the construction contract with Frontline General Engineering, Inc. is $473,532. Funding for this project was approved using the Citywide Park Fund, the General Fund’s FY2023-24 year-end budget surplus and the General Fund Capital Reserve Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

5. Support community engagement and advocacy

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Josh Cervantes, Park Development Project Manager
Jill Nunes, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Vicinity Map

2. Resolution 26-346

3. NOC

4. EXHIBIT A
REVIEWERS:

Josh Cervantes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development
Created/Initiated -
7/28/2026
Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 7/28/2026 Jill Nunes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 7/29/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/3/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 8/4/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/5/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/5/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 8/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/6/2026

The Courts at Gibson Park
Frontage
Existing Pickleball Courts
Gibson Drive
Roseville Parkway
The Courts at Gibson Park
Frontage Improvement Project
Vicinity Map

RESOLUTION NO. 26-346

ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS THE COURTS AT GIBSON PARK FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF
COMPLETION”, AND AUTHORIZING THE PARKS, RECREATION AND LIBRARIES

DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The “Notice of Completion” on file in the City Clerk’s Department relative to that public work known as The Courts at Gibson Park Frontage Improvement Project, has been approved and the public work accepted.

2. The Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _____________________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________

City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal
corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true. ___________________________________
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

PROJECT SITE

E ROSEVILLE PARKWAY

GIBSON DRIVE

CONFERENCE CENTER
DRIVE

TREHOWELL DRIVE

KEELY DRIVE

CHASE DRIVE

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.2
File #: 0707
Item ID: 2026-708
Title: Roseville Aquatics Complex Renovation Project - Award of Agreement Contact: Heather Buck 916-774-5254 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of an agreement with J-Walt Construction, Inc., in the amount of $2,266,000 to renovate the Roseville Aquatics Complex which will include replastering of the competition pool and upgrades to the locker rooms and restrooms. Additive alternates include mechanical pit wall repairs, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning improvements to the classroom, sports lighting replacements, additional plumbing improvements, door closer replacements, and replacement of the pool surge pit cover. Funding for renovation of this aquatic facility was provided by fiscal year 2024-25 General Fund year-end budget surplus appropriated in the FY2026-27 budget to the Roseville Aquatics Complex Renovations Project in the Parks Recreation and Library Capital Projects Fund. There will be no increase in General Fund maintenance costs.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution to approve the agreement with J-Walt Construction, Inc., in the amount of $2,266,000; and

2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the contract price.

BACKGROUND
The 30-year-old Roseville Aquatics Complex (RAC) is located on Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard south of Pleasant Grove Boulevard. The project includes replastering of the competition pool and upgrades to the locker rooms and restrooms to ensure accessibility compliance. Additive alternates were identified for budget purposes to allow for “menu style” bidding, and include mechanical pit wall repairs, HVAC improvements to the classroom, sports lighting replacements, additional plumbing improvements, door closer replacements, and replacement of the pool surge pit cover.

Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to bid the project at the June 17, 2026 Council meeting.

Bid Summary
The bids opened on August 5, 2026. The bid results and engineer's estimate are as follows:

Bidder *Total Lump Sum Bid

J-Walt Construction, Inc. $2,266,000.00
Pride Industries $2,270,479.00
TPM Construction, Inc. $2,368,700.00
Bobo Construction, Inc. $2,468,626.00
BRCO Constructors, Inc. $2,475,000.00
Z Squared Construction $2,507,000.00
D.G. Granade, Inc. $2,593,704.00
Nyecon $2,636,962.00
JPB Designs, Inc. $2,784,000.00
Creekside Commercial Builders, Inc. $2,827,879.00
Rodan Builders, Inc. $2,874,695.00
CSI Services $3,194,600.00
Tricon Construction, Inc. $3,224,163.05
Stronger Building Services $3,371,500.00
Pro-Ex Construction, Inc. $3,676,215.75
Engineers Estimate: 3,690,428.00
*Total lump sum bid includes the base bid and nine (9) add alternatives.

Staff recommends awarding the project to J-Walt Construction, Inc., in the amount of $2,266,000, which includes the base bid and additive alternates #1-#9 including mechanical pit wall repairs, HVAC improvements to the classroom, sports lighting replacements, additional plumbing improvements, door closer replacements, and replacement of the pool surge pit cover. The renovation of the facility is scheduled to begin in late September 2026, with reopening planned by Memorial Day in 2027.

CONTINGENCY
During the course of a construction project, it is common to encounter unanticipated or changed conditions in the field which necessitate additions or other changes to the project and the contract. Given the complexity of this rehabilitation project combined with the age of the facility, staff requests authorization to approve change orders totaling up to 15% of the contract price, in accordance with the terms and

conditions of the contract.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for renovation of this aquatic facility was provided by fiscal year 2024-25 General Fund year-end budget surplus appropriated in the FY2026-27 budget to the Roseville Aquatics Complex Renovations Project in the Parks Recreation and Library Capital Projects Fund. Per the Joint Use Agreement with the Roseville Joint Union High School District, the district will share approximately 20% of the cost of the competition pool portion of the project. Annual General Fund revenue generated by the facility exceeds $700,000. There will be no increase in General Fund maintenance costs.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of existing facilities and structures. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines §15301). The project also involves the replacement of existing facilities and structures. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 2 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines §15302). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Heather Buck, Senior Park Development Project Manager
Jill Nunes, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Vicinity Map

2. Resolution 26-333

3. Agreement

4. CEQA Exemption (Class 1 and 2)

5. RAC Renovation Bid Summary

6. letter of intent to award

7. Labor and Materials Payment Bond
REVIEWERS:

Heather Buck, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development
Created/Initiated -
8/24/2026
Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 8/25/2026 Jill Nunes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 8/26/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/2/2026

Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/3/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/3/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/4/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/4/2026

Roseville Aquatics Complex
Vicinity Map
Roseville Aquatics
Complex

RESOLUTION NO. 26-333

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND J-WALT CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an Agreement for the Roseville Aquatics Complex Renovation Project, by and between the City of Roseville and J-Walt Construction, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Roseville Aquatics Complex Renovation
Project Location(s): 3051 Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard (APN 017-370-006-000), Roseville, CA Project Description: The Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department proposes a new project to renovate the Roseville Aquatics Complex (RAC). The project includes replastering of the competition pool and upgrades to the locker rooms and restrooms to ensure accessibility compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Additional improvements could include mechanical pit wall repairs, HVAC improvements to the classroom, sports lighting replacements, additional plumbing improvements, door closer replacements, and replacement of the pool surge pit cover. This project would allow for repair, maintenance, and improvements to keep an existing facility up to date. It would not result in expansion of use or capacity.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Park, Recreation and Libraries Department
Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for Class 1 and Class 2 Exemptions as described in Sections 15301 and 15302 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which state:
“Class 1 consists of the repair, maintenance…, or minor alteration of public or private…facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features involving negligible or no expansion of use of existing or former use…” and
“Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaces and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced…” The project activities are the repair, maintenance, minor alteration and replacement of existing structures and equipment and will have the same purpose and capacity as the existing structures and equipment. Therefore, the Class 1 and Class 2 Exemptions are applicable to the proposed project.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Heather Buck, Park, Recreation and Libraries Department, 316 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678. 916-774-5254.

Signature: Date: 4/30/2026
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville
~J
R0sEl iLLE

CALIFORNIA

316 Vernon Street, Suite 400
Roseville, CA 95678

NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD
Date: August 24, 2026
To: All Proposers concerning Roseville Aquatics Complex Renovation Project - (IFB 13-197)
Subject: Notice of Intent to Award
For Roseville Aquatics Complex Renovation Project, pending City Council approval, the City recommends awarding a contract to J-Walt Construction, Inc.

To inquire about the recommended award, please write to Senior Park Development Project Manager Heather Buck, at [email protected].

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.3
File #: 0704-01
Item ID: 2026-738
Title: Del Stephenson Park Play Structure Replacement - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Playpower LT Farmington, Inc. c/o All About Play, Inc. for the Del Stephenson Park play structure replacement in the amount of $189,416.44.

Funding and maintenance for the play structure replacement is through the Highland Reserve North Community Facilities District No. 2 (Services District). There will be no General Fund impact.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Contract Purchase Agreement for $189,416.44 with Playpower LT Farmington, Inc. c/o All About Play, Inc. for the Del Stephenson Park play structure replacement.

BACKGROUND
In summer 2026, the recently replaced play structure at Del Stephenson Park caught fire and was destroyed. For public safety, the damaged structure was promptly removed. The new replacement will replicate the previous design, with an added enhancement of a larger integrated shade feature.

The Contract Purchase Agreement is based on Sourcewell/National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA) Contract No. 010521-LTS. Through the City’s participation in Sourcewell/NJPA, the City is authorized to utilize competitively solicited contract pricing for the purchase of play equipment. Accordingly, a separate competitive bidding process is not required for this play structure.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding and maintenance for the play structure replacement is through the Highland Reserve North Community Facilities District No. 2 (Services District). No insurance recovery will be claimed because the replacement cost of the structure is less than the City’s $250,000 property insurance policy deductible.

There is no General Fund impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the replacement of an existing facility amenity. The activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 2 Exemption (State CEQA Guideline Section 15302). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning and Development Manager
Jill Nunes, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Vicinity Map

2. Resolution 26-340

3. Contract Purchase Agreement

4. CEQA Exemption

5. Faithful Performance Bond

6. Labor and Materials Payment Bond
REVIEWERS:

Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Created/Initiated - 8/24/2026 Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 8/24/2026 Jill Nunes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 8/26/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/3/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/4/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/7/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/8/2026

Vicinity Map – Del Stephenson Park

RESOLUTION NO. 26-340

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON, INC., C/O ALL ABOUT PLAY, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, the Contract Purchase Agreement (3005789) for the Del Stephenson Park Play Structure Replacement project, by and between the City of Roseville and Playpower LT Farmington, Inc., c/o All About Play, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Del Stephenson Park Play Structure Replacement Contract Purchase Agreement Project Location(s): 6665 Maple Creek Drive (APN 017-123-034-000), Roseville, CA 95678.

Project Description: The Parks, Recreation and Libraries (PRL) Department proposes to approve a contract purchase agreement to replace the former play structure located at Del Stephenson Park. The play structure was damaged beyond repair when it caught fire earlier this summer. The damaged play structure was immediately removed to ensure public safety and will be replaced with similar structure with a larger shade structure, which would not substantially increase the park’s capacity or use.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Park, Recreation and Libraries Department
Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 2 Exemption as described in Section 15302 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced.

The project would approve funding to purchase and install new play structure equipment to replace a structure that had to be removed recently due to extensive fire damage. The new play structure and will have the same purpose and capacity as the existing structure. Therefore, the Class 2 Exemption is applicable to the proposed project.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Tara Gee, Park, Recreation and Libraries Department, 316 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678. 916-774-5253.

Signature: Date: 9/1/2026
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.4
File #: 0203-10
Item ID: 2026-743
Title: Summerhill Park Play Structure Replacement Project - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Josh Cervantes 916-746-1233 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Playpower LT Farmington, Inc. c/o All About Play for Summerhill Park play structure replacement in the amount of $190,000. Funding for this project was approved by Council in FY2025-26. The Summerhill Park play structure replacement project is funded through the Parks, Recreation & Library Capital Projects Fund. There will be no additional General Fund impact.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Contract Purchase Agreement for $190,000 with Playpower LT Farmington, Inc. c/o All About Play, for the Summerhill Park play structure replacement.

BACKGROUND
In the spring of 2026, staff sought public feedback for new play structures at Summerhill Park. The outreach process included social media and onsite signage with a QR code inviting residents to review, comment, and vote on proposed play structure designs. Through a two to three-week period, feedback received from residents generally supported the proposed playground improvements while identifying several desired features and a few modifications. A few modifications were revised to increase overall play-value, with support from resident feedback. The preferred play structure layouts are included herein.

The Contract Purchase Agreement is based on Sourcewell/National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA) Contract No. 101625-PLP. Through the City’s participation in Sourcewell/NJPA, the City is authorized to utilize competitively solicited contract pricing for the purchase of play equipment. Accordingly, a separate competitive bidding process is not required for this play structure.

FISCAL IMPACT
The funding for Summerhill Playground replacement was approved by Council in FY2025-26. Summerhill Park is funded through the Parks, Recreation & Library Capital Projects Fund. There will be no additional General Fund impact. Maintenance costs for Summerhill Park will also not increase as a result of the playground replacement.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the replacement of existing structures and facilities. This activity is categorically exempt from cera as a Class 2 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Guidelines Section 15302). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

5. Support community engagement and advocacy

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Josh Cervantes, Park Development Project Manager
Jill Nunes, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Vicinity Map

2. Resolution 26-341

3. Contract Purchase Agreement

4. Concept Photos

5. CEQA Exemption

6. Faithful Performance Bond

7. Labor and Materials Payment Bond
REVIEWERS:

Josh Cervantes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development
Created/Initiated -
8/24/2026
Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 8/24/2026 Jill Nunes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 8/26/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/3/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/8/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/8/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/8/2026

Summerhill Park
Playground Replacement Project
Vicinity Map
Summerhill Park

RESOLUTION NO. 26-341

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON, INC., C/O ALL ABOUT PLAY, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, the Contract Purchase Agreement (3005790) for the Summerhill Park Play Structure Replacement project, by and between the City of Roseville and Playpower LT Farmington, Inc., c/o All About Play, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Summerhill Park Play Structure Replacement Project Location(s): 648 Granada Pass Drive (APN 363-022-015), Roseville, CA 95678.

Project Description: The Parks, Recreation and Libraries (PRL) Department proposes to replace the existing play structure located at Summerhill Park. The existing play structure is outdated and will be replaced with similar play components. Minor modifications would be made to increase overall play value but would not substantially increase the park’s capacity or use.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Park, Recreation and Libraries Department
Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 2 Exemption as described in Section 15302 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced.

The project would approve the purchase and installation of new play structure equipment to replace an existing outdated play structure. The new play structure will have the same purpose and capacity as the existing structure. Therefore, the Class 2 Exemption is applicable to the proposed project.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Joshua Cervantes, Park, Recreation and Libraries Department, 316 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678. 916-746-1233.

Signature: Date: 9/3/2026
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.5
File #: 0704
Item ID: 2026-752
Title: Water Services - Sole Source Purchase Order
Contact: Anita Kwong 916-774-5243 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a sole source open purchase order including four (4) additional one-year renewals with Placer County Water Agency for water services to Roseville customers in Stoneridge Specific Plan. Placer County Water Agency is the sole supplier of water services in portions of the Stoneridge Specific Plan. The total cost of the purchase order is not to exceed $764,000 over five years.

Funding will be provided from the annual budgets of the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department in the General Fund and Stoneridge Community Facilities District No. 1 (Services District).

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a sole source open purchase order with Placer County Water Agency for water services and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville. Additionally, staff requests authority for the City Manager or his designee to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

BACKGROUND
In 1993, the City enlisted the help of SPINK Corporation to develop a water system master plan. This plan identified four different pressure zones needed to provide adequate service to Roseville customers. The Stoneridge Specific Plan is situated over two of the higher-pressure zones. Water supply for a good portion of the specific plan was to be provided by Placer County Water Agency (PCWA).

In reviewing the proposed specific plan infrastructure, staff felt that the most economical way to provide service to the highest-pressure zone would be to work with PCWA. Using PCWA infrastructure and system elevation minimizes the amount of pumping required to service high-pressure zones.

To accomplish this, PCWA and the City entered into an agreement in March 1998 (Reso #2067) to exchange service areas of similar sizes. The City provides service in the lower areas and PCWA provides service in the higher elevation areas. These service area exchanges are located within the Stoneridge Specific Plan.

Historically, the City paid PCWA for these services using the payment request form process. Beginning in FY 2024–25, staff transitioned to using purchase orders to improve cost tracking and financial transparency. Due to continued increases in water service rates, the total annual expenditures now exceed the City Council’s spending authorization limit.

FISCAL IMPACT

The estimated cost is $125,000 for FY2026-27, $138,000 for FY2027-28, $152,000 for FY2028-29, $166,000 for FY2029-30, and $183,000 for FY2030-31. The total not-to-exceed cost for the purchase orders, including the four additional one-year renewals, is $764,000. Funding will be provided from the annual budgets of the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department in the General Fund and Stoneridge Community Facilities District No. 1 (Services District).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. A purchase order for Placer County Water Agency water service meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Anita Kwong, Management Analyst
Jill Nunes, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-334
REVIEWERS:

Anita Kwong, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Administration Created/Initiated - 8/25/2026 Rendi Hodge, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Administration Approved - 8/25/2026 Mackenzie Gonzalez, City Clerk Department Approved - 8/26/2026 Jill Nunes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 8/26/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/2/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/2/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-334

APPROVING A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE ORDER FOR WATER SERVICES

WHEREAS, a sole source purchase order for water services to Roseville customers in the Stoneridge Specific Plan, by and between the City of Roseville and the Placer County Water Agency, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order is approved.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve an additional four (4) one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this vendor is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.6
File #: 0704
Item ID: 2026-726
Title: Maidu Museum and Historic Site Exhibit Refresh Project - Professional Design Services Agreement
Contact: Narinderpal Sufi 916-774-5234 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a professional design services agreement with Lord Cultural Resources Planning & Management Inc. in the amount of $255,206 to provide design services for the internal exhibit space at the Maidu Museum and Historic Site. Funding was appropriated in the FY2025-26 Capital Improvement Project budget to the Maidu Museum and Historic Site Exhibit Refresh Project in the Parks, Recreation & Library Capital Projects Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Professional Design Services Agreement with Lord Cultural Resources Planning & Management Inc. for the Maidu Museum and Historic Site Exhibit Refresh project, and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
The Maidu Museum & Historic Site is situated on a federally protected historic site that was home to a Nisenan Maidu village for thousands of years. The current museum was built in 2010 to support the museum’s mission of protecting, preserving, and interpreting the cultural and natural heritage of the historic site and region, while providing programs and exhibits that serve to stimulate visitor involvement, enjoyment, learning, and support. The current exhibits have been in place since opening in 2010 and require updates and enhancements to improve visitor experience and engagement.

A Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued in August 2025, to seek proposals for the comprehensive redesign and re-imagination of current and future exhibits at the Maidu Museum & Historic Site with an opportunity for a design-assist agreement for the implementation. Eight firms submitted proposals; after interviewing the top candidates, Lord Cultural Resources Planning & Management Inc. is recommended for the award based on the firm’s global experience, references, and qualifications within the field.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the Professional Design Services Agreement, with Lord Cultural Resources Planning & Management Inc. in the amount of $255,206, was appropriated in the FY2025-26 Capital Improvement Project budget to the Maidu Museum and Historic Site Exhibit Refresh Project in the Parks, Recreation & Library Capital Projects Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not

subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

5. Support community engagement and advocacy

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Narinderpal Sufi, City Librarian
Jill Nunes, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-335

2. Professional Design Services Agreement

3. Master Averaged Score Sheet
REVIEWERS:

Narinderpal Sufi, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Library Created/Initiated - 8/25/2026 Narinderpal Sufi, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Library Approved - 8/25/2026 Jill Nunes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 8/26/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/3/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/3/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/4/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/4/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-335

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND LORD CULTURAL RESOURCES PLANNING & MANAGEMENT INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE

IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Professional Design Services Agreement for the Maidu Museum & Historic Site Exhibit Refresh project, by and between the City of Roseville and Lord Cultural Resources Planning & Management Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Department: PRL
Date: 9/19/2025
RFP No. 13-170
for
Maidu Museum & Historic Site Exhibit Refresh
Experience
and Quals Project Understanding Schedule
Project
Approach Total
Ranking Company Name Score (after
weighting)
Percentage
Weighting
Score (after weighting) Percentage
Weighting
Score (after
weighting)
Percentage
Weighting
Score (after
weighting)
Percentage
Weighting
Score
DG Studios 20 30 19 25 12 15 20 30 71
Formula D 21 30 20 25 10 15 21 30 72
Lord 26 30 21 25 13 15 26 30 86
Object Project 18 30 21 25 12 15 20 30 71
Process Curiosity 18 30 21 25 12 15 20 30 71
Quatrefoil Associates 22 30 22 25 13 15 24 30 81
Riggs Ward 26 30 23 25 13 15 26 30 88
The Exhibits Dept 26 30 22 25 13 15 26 30 87
30 25 15 30 0
Instructions to end users: Delete this section before publishing the score sheet.

Novus. Publish the completed score sheet in Novus as a "non-public" document.

Evaluation Score Sheets. Upon a request pursuant to section 1.8 (Public Disclosure) of the City's RFP Policy document , a proposer is entitled to a master averaged score sheet that reflects the averaged evaluation scores of the proposers during the evaluation panel’s initial evaluation and the ranking of proposers from any interview (individual score sheets and/or notes are temporary and are not retained following a determination of the evaluation panel). The master score sheet and ranking shall be prepared by City staff prior to notifying any proposers of the results.

Section 1.8 Public Disclosure. In accordance with the California Public Records Act, proposals submitted in response to a RFP, master averaged score sheets from the initial evaluation, and/or rankings from any interview shall be made available upon a public records request only after: (1) the proposal evaluation process is complete, (2) a contract has been negotiated, and (3) notice of intent to award has been made and/or the contract is placed on a City Council meeting agenda.

Use one of the following point systems for scoring:
95 - 100 = Excellent 5 = Excellent
85 - 95 = Above Average 4 = Above Average
75 - 84 = Average 3 = Average
65 - 74 = Fair 2 = Fair
55 - 64 = Poor 1 = Poor
0 - 54 = Unacceptable 0 = Unacceptable

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.7
File #: 0704 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-706
Title: Stone Point Community Facilities District No. 5 Parks Rehabilitation - New Capital Improvement Project and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Brian Castelluccio 916-746-1755 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment of $155,357 for the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – Stone Point Communities Facilities District 5 Parks Rehabilitation. Funding is provided by available resources in the Stone Point Community Facilities District No. 5 Capital Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – Stone Point Community Facilities District 5 Parks Rehabilitation and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $155,357 into the project. Funding is provided by available resources in the Stone Point Community Facilities District No. 5 Capital Fund.

BACKGROUND
All developer projects funded through the Stone Point Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 5 bond have been completed. The remaining balance is now available to support rehabilitation projects within the Stone Point CFD 5 area. Proposed expenditures will focus on improvements to Stone Point CFD 5 parks and enhancement of existing facilities. This project will provide funding for improvements at Piches and Kennedy Parks, including repainting site furniture, restriping sports courts, repairing or replacing site furniture and landscaping, improving security lighting, and other necessary facility improvements. This action appropriates remaining Stone Point CFD No. 5 bond funds.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the Stone Point CFD 5 Parks Rehabilitation project is through the Stone Point CFD No. 5 Capital Fund. There will be no General Fund impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Castelluccio, Parks Recreation and Libraries Manager Jill Nunes, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 7103
REVIEWERS:

Brian Castelluccio, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Maintenance
Created/Initiated -
8/24/2026
Brian Castelluccio, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Maintenance
Approved - 8/24/2026
Jill Nunes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 8/26/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/3/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/3/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/4/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/4/2026

ORDINANCE NO. 7103

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2026-27, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Stone Point Community Facilities District 5 Parks Rehabilitation Capital Improvement Project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 06/03/2026
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCAL YEAR:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
3009 5301 84001 500714 155,357 Establish expenditure budget for park improvements project
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 155,357

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 155,357

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project DESCRIPTION
3009 3601 00000 000000 (155,357) Decrease Stone Point CFD 5 Capital Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (155,357)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

Staff recommends that Council authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – Stone Point CFD 5 Parks Rehabilitation (500714) and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $155,357 into the project. Funding is provided by available resources in the Stone Point Community Facilities District 5 Capital Fund (3009).

All developer projects funded through the Stone Point Community Facilities District (CFD) 5 bond have been completed. The remaining bond balance is now available to support rehabilitation projects within the Stone Point CFD 5 area. Proposed expenditures will focus on improvements to Stone Point CFD 5 parks and enhancement of existing facilities. This project will provide funding for improvements at Piches and Kennedy Parks, including repainting site furniture, restriping sports courts, repairing or replacing site furniture and landscaping, improving security lighting, and other necessary facility improvements.

This action reallocates existing Stone Point CFD 5 bond funds and will have no impact on the General Fund.

Brian Castelluccio, Parks Manager 2026-27
Anita Kwong, Management Analyst
PRL

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.8
File #: 0704 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-707
Title: North Roseville Community Facilities District 1 Park Rehabilitation - New Capital Improvement Project and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Brian Castelluccio 916-746-1755 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment of $133,530 for the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – North Roseville Community Facilities District 1 Park Rehabilitation. Funding is provided by available resources in the North Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1 Fund. There will be no General Fund impact.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – North Roseville Community Facilities District 1 Park Rehabilitation and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $133,530 into the project.

BACKGROUND
The North Roseville Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 1 bond matured in September 2023. The remaining cash balance is now available to support rehabilitation projects within the North Roseville CFD 1 area. Target expenditures are proposed for North Roseville CFD 1 parks to enhance existing facilities, which could include soccer field renovations, decomposed granite pathway renovations, repair or replacement of site furniture, and other improvements as needed. This action appropriates the remaining North Roseville CFD 1 bond funds.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding is provided by available resources from the North Roseville CFD 1 Fund. There will be no General Fund impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The North Roseville CFD 1 Capital Improvement Project and Budget Adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Castelluccio, Parks Recreation and Libraries Manager Jill Nunes, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 7104
REVIEWERS:

Brian Castelluccio, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Maintenance
Created/Initiated -
8/24/2026
Brian Castelluccio, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Maintenance
Approved - 8/24/2026
Jill Nunes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 8/26/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/4/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/7/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/8/2026

ORDINANCE NO. 7104

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2026-27, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the North Roseville Community Facilities District 1 Park Rehabilitation Capital Improvement Project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 06/03/2026
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCAL YEAR:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
7415 5569 80701 133,530
Increase budget to move available resources from the
North Roseville CFD 1 Fund to the Parks Recreation and
Library Capital Projects Fund
3130 5301 84001 500713 133,530 Establish project expenditure budget EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 267,060

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
3130 4780 80301 133,530 Receiving available resources from North Roseville CFD 1 Fund
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL 133,530
NET ADJUSTMENT 133,530

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project DESCRIPTION
7415 3601 00000 000000 (133,530) Decrease North Roseville CFD 1 Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (133,530)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

Staff recommends that Council authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – North Roseville CFD 1 Park Rehabilitation (500713) and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $133,530 into the project. Funding is provided by available resources from the North Roseville CFD 1 Fund (7415) being moved into the Parks, Recreation and Librariy Capital Projects Fund (3031).

The North Roseville Community Facilities District (CFD) 1 bond matured in September 2023, and the remaining balance is now available to support rehabilitation projects within the North Roseville CFD 1 area. This project provides funding for improvements at parks located within the North Roseville CFD 1, which could include soccer field renovations, decomposed granite pathway renovations, repair or replacement of site furniture, and other improvements as needed. Target expenditures are proposed for North Roseville CFD 1 parks to enhance existing facilities. This action reallocates existing North Roseville CFD 1 bond funds. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Brian Castelluccio, Parks Manager 2026-27
Anita Kwong, Management Analyst
PRL

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.9
File #: 0800-03
Item ID: 2026-754
Title: California Independent System Operator Extended Day Ahead Market – Onboarding Agreements
Contact: Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) Extended Day-Ahead Market (EDAM) agreements, which include the EDAM Load Serving Entity Agreement, the EDAM Addendum to the Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Participating Resource Agreement, and the EDAM Addendum to the EIM Participating Resource Scheduling Coordinator Agreement, that are required for Roseville Electric Utility’s onboarding and registration for planned EDAM participation in 2027. There is no fiscal impact associated with the EDAM onboarding and application process. Roseville’s existing participation in the Western EIM satisfies the applicable CAISO application requirements, and no additional application fee is required.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) Extended Day-Ahead Market (EDAM) agreements which include the EDAM Load Serving Entity Agreement, the EDAM Addendum to the EIM Participating Resource Agreement, and the EDAM Addendum to the EIM Participating Resource Scheduling Coordinator Agreement, that are required for Roseville Electric Utility’s onboarding and registration for planned EDAM participation in 2027, and authorize the City Manager to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
CAISO operates the high-voltage transmission system serving most of California and administers wholesale electricity markets that balance electricity supply and demand. EDAM expands regional market coordination into the day-ahead timeframe, allowing participating utilities to optimize energy purchases and generation schedules one day in advance across a broader Western region. EDAM builds on the Western Energy Imbalance Market (EIM), which Roseville joined in March 2021 and which has provided access to additional generation resources, greater operational flexibility, and power supply cost savings.

Participation in EDAM is voluntary and does not require Roseville to join the CAISO balancing authority.

Roseville will retain operational control of its electric system while using the CAISO market platform to improve coordination and access to regional energy resources. Many utilities throughout the Western Interconnection have committed to joining EDAM. The first participant began operation under EDAM in May 2026, with Roseville targeting participation in 2027 in coordination with the Balancing Authority of Northern California (BANC).

Roseville’s participation in EDAM is expected to provide greater access to regional generation resources, additional opportunities for cost-effective energy purchases, and improved coordination with other Western utilities. As part of the implementation process, CAISO requires EDAM participants to complete an

onboarding process and execute agreements establishing the operational, scheduling, and settlement responsibilities necessary to participate in the CAISO-administered market. These include addendums to Roseville’s existing EIM participation agreements and a new EDAM Load Serving Entity agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the EDAM onboarding and application process. Roseville’s existing participation in the Western EIM satisfies the applicable CAISO application requirements, and no additional application fee is required.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Approval of the onboarding agreements to participate in EDAM meet the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Petra Wallace, Power Supply and Portfolio Administrator Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-344

2. LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT

3. ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE SCHEDULING COORDINATOR

AGREEMENT

4. ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE AGREEMENT REVIEWERS:

Eric Rivera, Electric Department - Resource Planning & Generation Created/Initiated - 8/25/2026 William Forsythe, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/26/2026 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/27/2026 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/27/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/3/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/4/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/7/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/8/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-344

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR EXTENDED DAY-AHEAD

MARKET AGREEMENTS
WHEREAS, the California Independent System Operator’s (CAISO) operates the highvoltage transmission system serving most of California and administers wholesale electricity markets that balance supply and demand across both day-ahead and real-time timeframes; and WHEREAS, the Extended Day-Ahead Market (EDAM) is a new market developed by CAISO that expands regional coordination into the day-ahead timeframe for utilities and balancing authority areas (BAAs) that are outside the CAISO; and WHEREAS, the EDAM builds on the success of the Western Energy Imbalance Market (EIM), which Roseville joined in March 2021, by allowing utilities to plan and optimize energy purchases one day in advance of the operating day; and
WHEREAS, participation in the EIM has provided Roseville Electric Utility with access to a larger pool of generation resources, improved operational flexibility, and reduced power supply costs; and
WHEREAS, Roseville Electric Utility is a member of the Balancing Authority of Northern California (BANC), and staff’s evaluation of participation in the EDAM aligns with BANC and its member utilities’ identification of the EDAM as their preferred long-term dayahead market solution; and WHEREAS, part of the EDAM implementation process, the CAISO requires participating entities to complete an onboarding process and execute agreements establishing the operational, scheduling, and settlement responsibilities necessary to participate in the CAISOadministered market; and WHEREAS, these include addendums to Roseville’s existing EIM participation agreements and a new EDAM Load Serving Entity agreement; and WHEREAS, City Council has reviewed the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) Extended Day-Ahead Market (EDAM) agreements which includes the EDAM Load Serving Entity Agreement, the EDAM Addendum to the EIM Participating Resource Agreement, and the EDAM Addendum to the EIM Participating Resource Scheduling Coordinator Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to execute the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) Extended Day-Ahead Market (EDAM) agreements.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM

OPERATOR CORPORATION
AND
City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMLSEA_12212023 2

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT

THIS EXTENDED DAY-AHEAD MARKET LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is established this day of , , and is
accepted by and between:

City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility (“EDAM Load Serving Entity”), a having its registered and principal executive office at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA, 95678, and
California Independent System Operator Corporation (“CAISO”), a California nonprofit public benefit corporation having a principal executive office located at such place in the State of California as the CAISO Governing Board may from time to time designate.

The EDAM Load Serving Entity and the CAISO are hereinafter referred to as the “Parties.” Whereas:

A. The CAISO operates the Day-Ahead Market and Real-Time Market pursuant to the CAISO Tariff.

B. The EDAM Load Serving Entity is responsible for Load within an EDAM Entity Balancing Authority Area not represented by an EDAM Entity and authorized by the EDAM Entity to represent its Load in the Day-Ahead Market and Real-Time Market; and
C. The Parties wish to enter into this Agreement to establish the terms and conditions for participation in the CAISO’s Day-Ahead Market and Real-Time Market by the EDAM Load Serving Entity in accordance with Section 33 and Section 29 of the CAISO Tariff.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE I

DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

1.1 Master Definitions Supplement. All terms and expressions used in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as those contained in the Master Definitions Supplement to the CAISOTariff.

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMLSEA_12212023 3

1.2 Rules of Interpretation. The following rules of interpretation and conventions shall apply to this Agreement:
(a) if there is any inconsistency between this Agreement and the CAISO Tariff, the CAISO Tariff will prevail to the extent of the inconsistency; (b) the singular shall include the plural and vice versa; (c) the masculine shall include the feminine and neutral and vice versa; (d) “includes” or “including” shall mean “including without limitation”; (e) references to a Section, Article or Schedule shall mean a Section, Article or a Schedule of this Agreement, as the case may be, unless the context otherwise requires;
(f) a reference to a given agreement or instrument shall be a reference to that agreement or instrument as modified, amended, supplemented or restated through the date as of which such reference is made;
(g) unless the context otherwise requires, references to any law shall be deemed references to such law as it may be amended, replaced or restated from time to time;
(h) unless the context otherwise requires, any reference to a “person” includes any individual, partnership, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, trust, association, organization or other entity, in each case whether or not having separate legal personality;
(i) unless the context otherwise requires, any reference to a Party includes a reference to its permitted successors and assigns;
(j) unless the context otherwise requires, “or” is used in the conjunctive sense; (k) any reference to a day, week, month or year is to a calendar day, week, month or year; and
(l) the captions and headings in this Agreement are inserted solely to facilitate reference and shall have no bearing upon the interpretation of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

1.3 EDAM Load Serving Entity’s Non-Jurisdictional Status. The CAISO acknowledges that the EDAM Load Serving Entity is a exempt/non-jurisdictional entity as described in section 201(f) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(f), and understands that this Agreement does not extend the authority that FERC has over the EDAM Load Serving Entity apart from any authority it has to interpret or enforce this Agreement.]

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMLSEA_12212023 4

ARTICLE II

RESPONSIBILITIES OF EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY

2.1 EDAM Load Serving Entity Scheduling Coordinator. The EDAM Load Serving Entity shall be represented by an EDAM Load Serving Entity Scheduling Coordinator, which may be the EDAM Load Serving Entity or another entity certified by the CAISO to perform the functions of an EDAM Load Serving Entity Scheduling Coordinator.

2.2 EDAM Load Serving Entity Information. The EDAM Load Serving Entity shall provide information regarding its Load to the CAISO for Extended Day-Ahead Market purposes, in accordance with the CAISO Tariff and applicable Business Practice Manuals. The EDAM Load Serving Entity is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this information.

ARTICLE III

TERM AND TERMINATION

3.1 Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective as of the later of the date it is executed by the Parties or the date it is accepted for filing and made effective by FERC, if such FERC filing is required, and shall remain in full force and effect until terminated pursuant to Section 3.2 of this Agreement.

3.2 Termination

3.2.1 Termination by CAISO. Subject to Section 10.2, the CAISO may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of termination in the event that (i) the EDAM Load Serving Entity commits any material default under this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff which, if capable of being remedied, is not remedied within thirty (30) days after the CAISO has given written notice of the default, unless excused by reason of Uncontrollable Forces in accordance with Article IX of this Agreement, or (ii) the EDAM Entity for the Balancing Authority Area in which the EDAM Load Serving Entity is located terminates participation in the CAISO’s Extended DayAhead Market. With respect to any notice of termination given pursuant to this Section, the CAISO must file a timely notice of termination with FERC, if this Agreement was filed with FERC, or must otherwise comply with the requirements of FERC Order No. 2001 and related FERC orders. The filing of the notice of termination by the CAISO with FERC will be considered timely if: (1) the filing of the notice of termination is made after the preconditions for termination have been met, and the CAISO files the notice of termination within sixty (60) days after issuance of the notice of default; or (2) the CAISO files the notice of termination in accordance with the requirements of FERC Order No. 2001. This Agreement shall terminate upon acceptance by FERC of such a notice of termination, if filed with FERC, or thirty (30) days after the date of the CAISO’s notice of default, if terminated in accordance with the requirements of FERC Order No. 2001 and related FERC orders.

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMLSEA_12212023 5

3.2.2 Termination by EDAM Load Serving Entity. In the event that the EDAM Load Serving Entity no longer wishes to participate in the CAISO’s Extended DayAhead Market, it may terminate this Agreement, on giving the CAISO not less than ninety (90) days written notice. With respect to any notice of termination given pursuant to this Section, the CAISO must file a timely notice of termination with FERC, if this Agreement has been filed with FERC, or must otherwise comply with the requirements of FERC Order No. 2001 and related FERC orders. The filing of the notice of termination by the CAISO with FERC will be considered timely if: (1) the request to file a notice of termination is made after the preconditions for termination have been met, and the CAISO files the notice of termination within thirty (30) days of receipt of such request; or (2) the CAISO files the notice of termination in accordance with the requirements of FERC Order No. 2001. This Agreement shall terminate upon acceptance by FERC of such a notice of termination, if such notice is required to be filed with FERC, or upon ninety (90) days after the CAISO’s receipt of the EDAM Load Serving Entity’s notice of termination, if terminated in accordance with the requirements of FERC Order No. 2001 and related FERC orders.

ARTICLE IV

CAISO TARIFF

4.1 Agreement Subject to CAISO Tariff. This Agreement shall be subject to Section 33 and Section 29 of the CAISO Tariff, which shall be deemed to be incorporated herein. The EDAM Load Serving Entity shall abide by, and shall perform all of the obligations under the CAISO Tariff placed on EDAM Load Serving Entities in respect of all matters set forth therein.

ARTICLE V
COSTS

5.1 Operating and Maintenance Costs. The EDAM Load Serving Entity shall be responsible for all its costs incurred in connection with meeting its obligations under thisAgreement.

ARTICLE VI

DISPUTE RESOLUTION

6.1 Dispute Resolution. The Parties shall make reasonable efforts to settle all disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement. In the event any dispute is not settled, the Parties shall adhere to the CAISO ADR Procedures set forth in Section 13 of the CAISO Tariff, which is incorporated by reference, except that any reference in Section 13 of the CAISO Tariff to Market Participants shall be read as a reference to the EDAM Load Serving Entity and references to the CAISO Tariff shall be read as references to this Agreement.

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMLSEA_12212023 6

ARTICLE VII

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

7.1 Representation and Warranties. Each Party represents and warrants that the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate and/or governmental actions, to the extent authorized by law.

7.2 Necessary Approvals. The EDAM Load Serving Entity represents that all necessary rights, leases, approvals, permits, licenses, easements, access to operate in compliance with this Agreement have been or will be obtained by the EDAM Load Serving Entity prior to the effective date of this Agreement, including any arrangement with the EDAM Entity for the Balancing Authority Area in which the EDAM Load Serving Entity is located and any third party Balancing Authorities.

ARTICLE XIII

LIABILITY

8.1 Liability. The provisions of Section 14 of the CAISO Tariff will apply to liability arising under this Agreement, except that all references in Section 14 of the CAISO Tariff to Market Participants shall be read as references to the EDAM Load Serving Entity and references to the CAISO Tariff shall be read as references to this Agreement.

ARTICLE IX

UNCONTROLLABLE FORCES

9.1 Uncontrollable Forces Tariff Provisions. Section 14.1 of the CAISO Tariff shall be incorporated by reference into this Agreement except that all references in Section 14.1 of the CAISO Tariff to Market Participants shall be read as a reference to the EDAM Load Serving Entity and references to the CAISO Tariff shall be read as references to this Agreement.

ARTICLE X

MISCELLANEOUS

10.1 Assignments. Either Party may assign or transfer any or all of its rights or obligations under this Agreement with the other Party’s prior written consent in accordance with Section 22.2 of the CAISO Tariff and no Party may assign or transfer any or all of its rights or obligations under this Agreement without such consent. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any such transfer or assignment shall be conditioned upon the successor in interest accepting the rights and/or obligations under this Agreement as if said successor in interest

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMLSEA_12212023 7
were an original Party to this Agreement.

10.2 Notices. Any notice, demand or request which may be given to or made upon either Party regarding this Agreement shall be made in accordance with Section

22.4 of the CAISO Tariff, provided that all references in Section 22.4 of the CAISO Tariff to Market Participants shall be read as a reference to the EDAM Load Serving Entity and references to the CAISO Tariff shall be read as references to this Agreement, and unless otherwise stated or agreed shall be made to the representative of the other Party indicated in Schedule 1 of this Agreement. A Party must update the information in Schedule 1 of this Agreement as information changes. Such changes shall not constitute an amendment to this Agreement.

10.3 Waivers. Any waiver at any time by either Party of its rights with respect to any default under this Agreement, or with respect to any other matter arising in connection with this Agreement, shall not constitute or be deemed a waiver with respect to any subsequent default or other matter arising in connection with this Agreement. Any delay, short of the statutory period of limitations, in asserting or enforcing any right under this Agreement shall not constitute or be deemed a waiver of such right.

10.4 Governing Law and Forum. This Agreement shall be deemed to be a contract made under, and for all purposes shall be governed by and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California, except its conflict of law provisions. The Parties irrevocably consent that any legal action or proceeding arising under or relating to this Agreement to which the CAISO ADR Procedures do not apply shall be brought in any of the following forums, as appropriate: any court of the State of California, any federal court of the United States of America located in the State of California, or, where subject to its jurisdiction, before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

10.5 Consistency with Federal Laws and Regulations. This Agreement shall incorporate by reference Section 22.9 of the CAISO Tariff as if the references to the CAISO Tariff were referring to this Agreement.

10.6 Merger. This Agreement constitutes the complete and final agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to such subject matter.

10.7 Severability. If any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement or the application or effect of any such term, covenant, or condition is held invalid as to any person, entity, or circumstance, or is determined to be unjust, unreasonable, unlawful, imprudent, or otherwise not in the public interest by any court or government agency of competent jurisdiction, then such term, covenant, or condition shall remain in force and effect to the maximum extent permitted by law, and all other terms, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement and their application shall not be affected thereby, but shall remain in force and effect and the Parties shall be relieved of their obligations only to the extent necessary to eliminate such regulatory or other determination unless a court or governmental

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMLSEA_12212023 8
agency of competent jurisdiction holds that such provisions are not separable from all other provisions of this Agreement.

10.8 Amendments. This Agreement and the Schedules attached hereto may be amended from time to time by the mutual agreement of the Parties in writing.

Amendments that require FERC approval shall not take effect until FERC has accepted such amendments for filing and made them effective. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as affecting in any way the right of the CAISO to unilaterally make application to FERC for a change in the rates, terms and conditions of this Agreement under Section 205 of the FPA and pursuant to FERC’s rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and the EDAM Load Serving Entity shall have the right to make a unilateral filing with FERC to modify this Agreement pursuant to Section 206 or any other applicable provision of the FPA and FERC’s rules and regulations thereunder; provided that each Party shall have the right to protest any such filing by the other Party and to participate fully in any proceeding before FERC in which such modifications may be considered.

Nothing in this Agreement shall limit the rights of the Parties or of FERC under Sections 205 or 206 of the FPA and FERC’s rules and regulations thereunder, except to the extent that the Parties otherwise mutually agree as provided herein.

10.9 Federal Provisions. The CAISO hereby affirmatively agrees to incorporate into this Agreement the federal law provisions as provided by the EDAM Load Serving Entity and previously agreed to by the CAISO.

10.10 Electronic Signatures. The Parties agree that this Agreement may be executed by either handwritten signature or digitally signed using Adobe Sign, Adobe ESign, or DocuSign. A digital signature is the same as a handwritten signature and shall be considered valid and acceptable.

10.11 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts at different times, each of which shall be regarded as an original and all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same Agreement.

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMLSEA_12212023 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on behalf of each by and through their authorized representatives as of the date hereinabove written.

California Independent System Operator Corporation
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:

City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:
8/24/2026
Vice President and CITO
Khaled Abdul-Rahman

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMLSEA_12212023 10
SCHEDULE 1

NOTICES
EDAM Load Serving Entity
Name of Primary
Representative: Dan Beans
Title: Utility Director
Company: City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility
Address: 116 S Grant St
City/State/Zip Code: Roseville, CA, 95678
Email Address: [email protected]
Phone: 916-774-5603
Name of Alternative
Representative: Petra Wallace
Title: Power Supply and Portfolio Manager
Company: City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility
Address: 116 S Grant St
City/State/Zip Code: Roseville, CA, 95678
Email Address: [email protected]
Phone: 916-774-5510

EDAM LOAD SERVING ENTITY AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMLSEA_12212023 11
CAISO
Name of Primary
Representative: Regulatory Contracts
Title: N/A
Address: 250 Outcropping Way
City/State/Zip Code: Folsom, CA 95630
Email address: [email protected]
Phone: (916) 351-4400
Fax: (916) 608-5063
Name of Alternative
Representative: Riddhi Ray
Title: Manager, Regulatory Contracts
Address: 250 Outcropping Way
City/State/Zip Code: Folsom, CA 95630
Email address: [email protected]
Phone: (916) 608-1056
Fax: (916) 608-5063

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR

CORPORATION
AND
City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE

EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE

SCHEDULING COORDINATOR AGREEMENT

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING

RESOURCE SCHEDULING COORDINATOR AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMAEIMPRSCA_12212023 2

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE

EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE

SCHEDULING COORDINATOR AGREEMENT
Effective _______________, City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility and the California Independent System Operator Corporation (“CAISO”) (collectively the “Parties”) make and enter into the EDAM Addendum to the Parties’ EIM Participating Resource Scheduling Coordinator Agreement (the “Agreement”).

Whereas:

A. Pursuant to the Agreement, City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility is certified as an EIM Participating Resource Scheduling Coordinator by the CAISO under the certification procedure referenced in Section 29 of the CAISO Tariff and represents EIM Participating Resources in an EDAM Entity Balancing Authority Area;
B. City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility extends its role as an EIM Participating Resource Scheduling Coordinator to the CAISO DayAhead Market so that it can represent EDAM Resources under the terms and conditions set forth in Section 33 of the CAISO Tariff; and C. City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility has applied for certification or has been certified as an EDAM Resource Scheduling Coordinator by the CAISO under the certification procedure referenced in Section 33 of the CAISO Tariff.

NOW THEREFORE, for good and sufficient consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree that the Agreement is hereby supplemented as follows:

1. Agreement to be Bound by CAISO Tariff. Section 33 of the CAISO Tariff is incorporated into the Agreement and made a part thereof.

2. Interpretation. All references in the Agreement to the “EIM” or the “Energy Imbalance Market” will also be read as references to the “EDAM” or the “Extended Day-Ahead Market.” All references in the Agreement to the “Real-Time Market” will also be read as references to the “Extended Day-Ahead Market.” All references in the Agreement to “EIM Participating Resources” will also be read as references to “EDAM Resources.” All references in the Agreement to “EIM Participating Resource Scheduling Coordinator(s)” will also be read as references to

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING

RESOURCE SCHEDULING COORDINATOR AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMAEIMPRSCA_12212023 3
the “EDAM Resource Scheduling Coordinator(s).” All references in the Agreement to Section 29 of the CAISO Tariff will also be read as references to Section 33 of the CAISO Tariff.

3. Effective Date and Termination. This EDAM Addendum will be effective as of the later of the date it is executed by the Parties and shall remain in full force and effect until terminated pursuant to the same process as is set forth in Section 3.2 of the Agreement. If City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility terminates its participation as an EDAM Resource Scheduling Coordinator, it may continue to participate as an EIM Participating Resource Scheduling Coordinator under the terms of the Agreement.

4. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly modified by this EDAM Addendum, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING

RESOURCE SCHEDULING COORDINATOR AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMAEIMPRSCA_12212023 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on behalf of each by and through their authorized representatives as of the date hereinabove written.

California Independent System Operator Corporation
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:

City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Khaled Abdul-Rahman
Vice President and CITO
8/24/2026

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING

RESOURCE SCHEDULING COORDINATOR AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMAEIMPRSCA_12212023 5
SCHEDULE 1

NOTICES
[Section 10.2]
EIM Participating Resource SC
Name of Primary
Representative: Dan Beans
Title: Utility Director
Company: City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility
Address: 116 S Grant St
City/State/Zip Code: Roseville, CA, 95678
Email Address: [email protected]
Phone: 916-774-5603
Name of Alternative
Representative: Petra Wallace
Title: Power Supply and Portfolio Manager
Company: City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility
Address: 116 S Grant St
City/State/Zip Code: Roseville, CA, 95678
Email Address: [email protected]
Phone: 916-774-5510

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING

RESOURCE SCHEDULING COORDINATOR AGREEMENT
CAISO_EDAMAEIMPRSCA_12212023 6
CAISO
Name of Primary
Representative: Regulatory Contracts
Title: N/A
Address: 250 Outcropping Way
City/State/Zip Code: Folsom, CA 95630
Email address: [email protected]
Phone: (916) 351-4400
Fax: (916) 608-5063
Name of Alternative
Representative: Riddhi Ray
Title: Manager, Regulatory Contracts
Address: 250 Outcropping Way
City/State/Zip Code: Folsom, CA 95630
Email address: [email protected]
Phone: (916) 608-1056
Fax: (916) 608-5063

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM

OPERATOR CORPORATION
AND
City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE

EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE

AGREEMENT

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE AGREEMENT CAISO_EDAMAEIMPRA_12212023 2

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE

EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE AGREEMENT
Effective _________________, City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility and the California Independent System Operator Corporation (“CAISO”) (collectively the “Parties”) make and enter into this EDAM Addendum to the Parties’ EIM Participating Resource Agreement (the “Agreement”).

Whereas:

A. Pursuant to the Agreement, City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility has participated or will participate as an EIM Participating Resource in the CAISO’s Real-Time Market and is located in an EDAM Entity Balancing Authority Area;
B. The CAISO also operates the Day-Ahead Market pursuant to the CAISO Tariff; and
C. City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility extends its participation to the CAISO’s Day-Ahead Market in accordance with the EDAM Entity’s open access transmission tariff or the tariff of another transmission service provider within the EDAM Entity Balancing Authority Area.

NOW THEREFORE, for good and sufficient consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree that the Agreement is hereby supplemented as follows:

1. Agreement to be Bound by CAISO Tariff. Section 33 of the CAISO Tariff is incorporated herein and made a part hereof.

2. Interpretation. All references in the Agreement to the “EIM” or the “Energy Imbalance Market” will also be read as references to the “EDAM” or the “Extended Day Ahead Market.” All references in the Agreement to an “EIM Entity” will also be read as references to an “EDAM Entity.” All references in the Agreement to “EIM Participating Resource(s)” will also be read as references to the “EDAM Resource(s).” All references in the Agreement to “EIM Resources” will also be read as references to “EDAM Resource Facilities.” All references in the Agreement to an “EIM Participating Resource Scheduling Coordinator” will also be read as references to an “EDAM Resource Scheduling Coordinator.” All references in the Agreement to Section 29 of the CAISO Tariff will also be read as references to Section 33 of the CAISO Tariff.

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE AGREEMENT CAISO_EDAMAEIMPRA_12212023 3

3. EDAM Resource Facilities. Schedule 1 of the Agreement will be updated to include all EDAM Resource Facilities not already included in Schedule 1 as an EIM Resource.

4. Effective Date and Termination. This EDAM Addendum will be effective as of the later of the date it is executed by the Parties and shall remain in full force and effect until terminated pursuant to the same process as is set forth in Section 3.2 of the Agreement, or until the EDAM Entity for the Balancing Authority Area in which the EDAM Resource is located ceases its participation in EDAM. If City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility terminates its participation as an EDAM Resource, it may continue to participate as an EIM Participating Resource under the terms of the Agreement.

5. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly modified by this EDAM Addendum, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE AGREEMENT CAISO_EDAMAEIMPRA_12212023 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on behalf of each by and through their authorized representatives as of the date hereinabove written.

California Independent System Operator Corporation
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:

City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Vice President and CITO
8/24/2026
Khaled Abdul-Rahman

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE AGREEMENT CAISO_EDAMAEIMPRA_12212023 5
SCHEDULE 1

NOTICES
[Section 10.2]
EIM Participating Resource
Name of Primary
Representative: Dan Beans
Title: Utility Director
Company: City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility
Address: 116 S Grant St
City/State/Zip Code: Roseville, CA, 95678
Email Address: [email protected]
Phone: 916-774-5603
Name of Alternative
Representative: Petra Wallace
Title: Power Supply and Portfolio Manager
Company: City of Roseville, Roseville Electric Utility
Address: 116 S Grant St
City/State/Zip Code: Roseville, CA, 95678
Email Address: [email protected]
Phone: 916-774-5510

EDAM ADDENDUM TO THE EIM PARTICIPATING RESOURCE AGREEMENT CAISO_EDAMAEIMPRA_12212023 6
CAISO
Name of Primary
Representative: Regulatory Contracts
Title: N/A
Address: 250 Outcropping Way
City/State/Zip Code: Folsom, CA 95630
Email address: [email protected]
Phone: (916) 351-4400
Fax: (916) 608-5063
Name of Alternative
Representative: Riddhi Ray
Title: Manager, Regulatory Contracts
Address: 250 Outcropping Way
City/State/Zip Code: Folsom, CA 95630
Email address: [email protected]
Phone: (916) 608-1056
Fax: (916) 608-5063

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.10
File #: 0800-03
Item ID: 2026-685
Title: Energy Risk Management Policies Update
Contact: Glenn Hoffman 916-746-1670 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of updates to the Energy Credit Risk Policy and Energy Trading Authority Policy, and reaffirming the Energy Risk Management Policy and Energy Hedge Policy. The recommended updates clarify existing risk management controls for Roseville Electric Utility and do not expand trading authority, increase credit approval limits, or change the City’s risk appetite. There is no fiscal impact associated with these policy changes.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving updates to the Energy Credit Risk Policy and Energy Trading Authority Policy, and reaffirming the Energy Risk Management Policy and Energy Hedge Policy.

BACKGROUND
Energy Risk Management Policy Updates
Energy markets are inherently volatile and, if left unmanaged, can expose the City of Roseville to significant financial risk. In response, the City adopted a comprehensive set of Energy Risk Management Policies in 2005 to guide the prudent operation of Roseville Electric. These policies provide the governance framework necessary to manage risks associated with energy procurement, trading activity, counterparty credit exposure, and hedging.

The City’s Energy Risk Management Policies include the following:

Energy Risk Management Policy
Establishes the overarching governance structure, including risk management objectives, roles, responsibilities, oversight, and reporting requirements.

Energy Credit Risk Policy
Defines the procedures for establishing, approving, monitoring, and managing counterparty credit limits and credit exposure to mitigate default risk.

Energy Trading Authority Policy
Outlines permissible transaction types and establishes authorization levels for approved energyrelated transactions.

Energy Hedge Policy
Establishes the utility’s hedging objectives, risk tolerance, and guidelines for managing price volatility in power supply costs.

Policy Review and Recommended Revisions

Roseville Electric periodically reviews its Energy Risk Management Policies to ensure they remain aligned with current market conditions, regulatory requirements, operating practices, and internal governance needs. The recommended policy updates were reviewed by staff, the Risk Management Committee, and the Risk Oversight Committee.

The proposed updates are limited in scope and are intended to clarify existing controls, improve consistency, and support continued documentation of risk management decisions. The updates do not expand trading authority, increase credit approval limits, or change the City’s risk appetite.

The following actions are recommended for Council approval:

Energy Risk Management Policy
Reaffirm the existing policy as part of the City’s overall energy risk governance framework.

Energy Credit Risk Policy
Approve updates clarifying how existing credit controls apply to Renewable Energy Credit (REC) transactions, including the review of counterparty creditworthiness, contract tenor, pricing structure, settlement terms, expected exposure, market liquidity, and replacement-cost risk. The update also clarifies that when sufficient financial information is not available to support an unsecured credit determination, the counterparty may be assigned a zero-dollar unsecured credit limit, and the transaction may proceed only with acceptable credit enhancements, settlement protections, secured structures, or other protections approved under the policy.

Energy Trading Authority Policy
Approve updates clarifying that approved energy-related transactions, including REC transactions, remain subject to applicable transaction authority, contract requirements, and credit requirements under the City’s risk management policies.

Energy Hedge Policy
Reaffirm the existing policy as part of the City’s framework for managing power supply price volatility.

These actions reinforce the City’s commitment to prudent energy risk management, consistent governance, and financial stability in the face of changing energy market conditions.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended policy changes.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Updates to the Energy Risk Policies are not considered a "project" as defined by CEQA and consequently no CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

Respectfully Submitted,
Glenn Hoffman, Electric Resources Planner
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-345

2. REAFFIRM Energy Risk Management Policy

3. REAFFIRM Energy Hedge Policy

4. REDLINE Energy Credit Risk Policy

5. REDLINE Energy Trading Authority Policy
REVIEWERS:

Glenn Hoffman, Electric Department - Financial & Administrative Created/Initiated - 8/14/2026 Joanna Cucchi, Electric Department - Financial & Administrative Approved - 8/14/2026 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/20/2026 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/20/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/3/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/4/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/7/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/8/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-345

REAFFIRMING THE ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY AND ENERGY HEDGE

POLICY, AND ADOPTING THE ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY AND ENERGY

TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY
WHEREAS, the City Council adopt a comprehensive set of Energy Risk Management Policies in 2005 to guide the prudent operation of Roseville Electric Utility; and WHEREAS, the policies are regularly reviewed and updated to reflect changes in market conditions, regulatory requirements and operational needs; and WHEREAS, no changes have been made to the Energy Risk Management Policy or the Energy Hedge Policy; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed updates to the Energy Credit Risk Policy and the Energy Trading Authority Policy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the Energy Risk Management Policy and the Energy Hedge Policy are reaffirmed.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the Energy Credit Risk Policy and the Energy Trading Authority Policy are hereby adopted.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY

Energy Risk Management Policy
5/21/2025

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY
Table of Contents

1.Policy Overview................................................................................................................... 1

2.Risk Management Objectives.............................................................................................. 1

3.Risk Governance Structure and Responsibilities.................................................................. 1

4.Scope of Business Activities Governed by this Policy ........................................................... 7

5.Related Policies................................................................................................................... 8

6.Version History ................................................................................................................... 9

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 1 of 9

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY
5/21/2025

1. Policy Overview
The purpose of this document is to formalize the policies of the City of Roseville (City) regarding managing the risks inherent to operating its electric utility. Accordingly, this policy will set forth the City’s:
• Risk management objectives,
• Risk governance structure and responsibilities,
• Scope of business activities governed by this policy, • and the list of associated energy risk management policy guidelines and policy documents.

The City intends that Risk Management will support the advancement of its strategic business plan and will properly manage its business and financial risks through:
• Prudent oversight,
• Appropriate mitigation of risks consistent with the City’s risk tolerance, and • Suitable internal controls and procedures.

Managing the energy risks of the City’s business entails the coordination of resources and activities among multiple business units within the City.

2. Risk Management Objectives
The City is committed to providing competitively priced reliable power to its customers.

Managing the City’s risk is consistent with that mission, and serves the following objectives:
• Maintain risk within desired tolerances for a defined period in the future, • Participate in the energy markets primarily for hedging purposes, while still allowing the City to take advantage of market opportunities within strict policy limits,
• Mitigate the effect of price volatility to its customers, • Maintain stable cash flows,
• Enhance the value of the City’s assets/resources,
• Leverage opportunities to increase the value of the City to its customers, and • Effectively communicate the City’s activities to manage risk on behalf of its customers and to develop a risk management culture.

3. Risk Governance Structure and Responsibilities
Risk governance will follow a top-down approach whereby the City Council identifies the City’s risk management objectives with oversight carried out by the Risk Oversight Committee (ROC). Supporting controls, policies, and procedures will be implemented and aligned throughout the risk governance structure, with distinct roles and responsibilities that result in an enhanced risk control environment. Governance and controls include the organizational structure, policies, and procedures that support the City’s business models, risk tolerances, electric utility objectives, and segregate responsibilities appropriately.

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 2 of 9
Energy Risk Management Policy
• Umbrella policy that sets Energy Risk Management objectives and culture • Creates expectations of disciplined and controlled processes Energy Credit Risk
Policy
Energy Trading Authority
Policy
Energy Hedge Policy
• Mitigate/avoid
credit losses
• Standards for
granting credit
• Credit controls
• Governing body
required approvals
• Delegation of
trading authority
• Authorized trading
instruments
• Required controls
• Energy hedge
ranges and
timeframes
• Hedging parameters
for other power
related activities:
capacity,
environmental,
congestion, etc.

3.1 City Council – Risk Management Responsibilities and Duties • Have a basic understanding of utility risk management. • Through approving the City’s energy risk management policies, establish the City’s objectives with regard to risk management. Those objectives should be consistent with the Council’s risk tolerance, time horizon, and benchmarking goals.
• Approve no less than every two years a resolution affirming or amending the City’s utility risk management policies. Amendments should be reflective of changes in the City’s electric utility operating environment or changes in Council’s goals and objectives for risk management.
• Through the Energy Trading Authority Policy, establish the City Manager’s authority limits to conduct market transactions.
• Through the Energy Trading Authority Policy, may authorize an agent to manage portfolio risks in real time, for up to two months, according to the City’s risk management objectives.
• Through the Energy Trading Authority Policy, approve participation in specific commodity markets and derivative instruments.
• Through the Energy Credit Risk Policy, establish the process by which counterparty credit limits are set, and how those limits are monitored. • Through approval of Master Agreements with counterparties, establish credit limits and terms with individual counterparties.
• Through the Energy Hedge Policy, establish requirements for hedging utility risk, and the financial boundaries within which the risk management program must operate.
• Receive regular reports from the Risk Oversight Committee as to the compliance status of the City’s risk management policies, and any suggestions for

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 3 of 9
improvement in policies or procedures.
• From time to time, direct staff to engage an independent audit (internal and/or external) of risk control processes and procedures.
• Approves any activity not otherwise delegated in this or related policy documents (Part 5).

3.2 Risk Oversight Committee (ROC) – Responsibilities and Duties The ROC is established by the City Council as a forum for discussion of the City’s risk and financial health prior to City Council discussions or approvals. The ROC functions as an additional oversight in the City risk governance, allowing the review and recommendation of items for City Council approval. The ROC is chaired by the City’s Chief Financial Officer and membership includes nine voting members:
i. Two City Council Members
ii. Two Roseville Public Utilities Commission Members
iii. The City Manager
iv. The Assistant City Manager
v. The Chief Financial Officer
vi. The City Attorney
vii. The Electric Utility Director
Other non-voting attendees may attend the ROC.

3.2.1 The responsibilities and duties of the ROC include:
• Oversee the City’s energy risk management activities on behalf of the City Council.
• Establish scope and frequency for management reporting to the Council. • Regularly review reports detailing risk exposure and compliance with risk management policies and procedures from the City’s internal risk management group and the Power Management Services Agent (energy management company acting on Roseville’s behalf).
• Discuss the City’s major financial risk exposures and the steps leadership has taken to monitor and control such exposures.
• Recommend to the Council energy risk management policy changes. • Review and recommend any new commodity products, locations, or markets. • Approve management staff to serve as members of an internal Risk Management Committee (RMC).
• Review Risk Management Policy violations referred to it by the RMC or the City Attorney to develop remediation procedures and/or initiate disciplinary action. • Review compliance violations with NERC, WECC, and other regulatory agencies on a regular basis.

ROC meetings are covered by the Brown Act, and subject to the Brown Act rules.

3.3 City Manager – Risk Management Responsibilities and Duties:
• Recommend management staff to serve as members of an internal Risk Management Committee.

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 4 of 9
• Has authority to transact within the limits set by the City Council in the City of Roseville Energy Trading Authority Policy.
• Approve proper organization, separation, or consolidation of functional activities. • Approve the level at which authority to conduct market transactions reside (from City Manager down to transaction execution personnel).
• Assure prudent administrative procedures are established for:
o trade, transactions, and executions,
o contract controls,
o credit controls,
o trading controls,
o portfolio risk measurement,
o settlement controls,
o regulatory and environmental compliance, and
o other risk management activities.

3.4 Internal Risk Management Committee (RMC)
– Responsibilities and Duties
The RMC is established by the City Manager as a forum for discussion of the City’s risk at the staff level; this includes implementation and monitoring of compliance with the City’s risk policies. The RMC executes its risk management responsibilities through a “watch dog” mechanism. While the RMC generally has no authority to act within its structure, it is required to inform appropriate functional authorities (e.g.

Electric Utility Director, and/or City Manager) regarding policy and procedure exceptions. Membership shall be comprised of the following individuals:
i. One delegate from the Finance Department
ii. One delegate from the City Attorney’s office
iii. The Electric Utility Director
iv. The Electric Utility Chief Operating Officer
v. Two Assistant Electric Utility Directors
The Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee shall participate as a nonvoting member of the meetings and serve as RMC Chairperson. Non-voting participants with various segregated risk management responsibilities shall participate in the meetings as determined by the committee members.

3.4.1 The responsibilities of the RMC include:
• Monitor risk management objectives, risk tolerances guidelines, and authority limits employed throughout the electric utility.
• Review reports by the internal risk management function and independent risk management function on the City’s compliance with its energy risk management policies.
• Recommend to the City Manager the proper organizational structure, separation or consolidation of functional risk management activities. • Review proposed risk management strategies for strategic fit, risk exposure monitoring, and reporting and control requirements. The RMC monitors approved strategies for consistency with the City’s approved business interests,

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 5 of 9
risk management objectives, approved risk tolerance guidelines, and compliance with the energy risk management policies.
• Periodically review the City’s risk management program (a detailed review at least once every two years) considering changes in business practices, improved processes, the City’s philosophy and strategy, or market changes; and recommend changes to ensure continued compliance with its established guidelines.
• Hold formal RMC meetings at least quarterly. Standing agenda items should include, but not be limited to, current market strategy, review of current price exposure position (per the Portfolio Model), review current exposure to transactions, control requirements enhancements, review of counterparty credit exposure, and trading authority violations.
• As necessary, escalate policy violations to the ROC for further review. • Review the infrastructure supporting risk management and ensure that it meets the requirements for risk oversight and compliance.

3.5 Internal Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee – Responsibilities and Duties
The Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee, is organizationally independent of functions whose activities initiate or directly participate in the commercial wholesale energy trading. Functional independence will be achieved by utilizing Agent and City staff deliverables through the RMC, specifically, the deal capture system, independent scheduling and dispatch, and the monthly portfolio plan.

Business units or support functions will be required to provide this function with reports or information required for risk assessment and analysis on a regular or periodic basis. The Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee may delegate responsibilities below when these delegations maintain organizational independence. The Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee oversees the Roseville internal risk management functions. The responsibilities of the Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee include:
• Organize and conduct the RMC and ROC meetings.
• Ensure appropriate individuals are engaged in risk management discussions. • Review the administration of risk management processes and procedures. • Review, at least annually, the City’s Risk Policies to ensure strategies, trading activity, risk tolerances and proposed changes are aligned. • Engage the RMC and/or ROC in discussions regarding events or developments that could expose the City to potential losses.
• Develop, recommend, and administer risk management processes and procedures.
• Provide input on tools to assist in risk management.
• Review risk management activities, risk controls, and recommend modifications of controls to meet changing business needs.
• Review adequacy and accuracy of reports and report any deficiencies to the RMC. Recommend actions to address deficiencies.
• Assess risks to the City in aggregate, by business unit, and by material business activities.

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 6 of 9
• Perform periodic internal audits of risk control processes and procedures to ensure that the City complies with its energy risk management policies. • Report any violation of the City’s risk policies.
• Review and approve changes to the risk management procedures, as appropriate, except those that require higher authority (Ex. City Manager) approval.
• Report to the RMC, at a minimum, but not limited to:
o Portfolio Model risk measures
o Policy and procedural violations
o Credit and contract risk exposures
o Other key performance indicators that support effective energy risk management.
• Report to the RMC and ROC on the City’s compliance with its energy risk management policies and risk management in accordance with the risk policies. • Review and evaluate proposed activities and transactions to be executed by the City and ensure adequate analysis (risk-reward) has been performed with proper assessment and management of any such risk consistent with risk management objectives and Council approved risk tolerance guidelines, and compliance with risk management policies, including the financial, legal, credit, and operational impact.
• Maintain the City Risk Policies, ensuring the Risk Policies are current to the business and recommend needed changes to the RMC and ROC.

3.6 Power Management Services Agent (Agent) – Roles and Responsibilities The City may select an Agent to obtain selected energy risk management and transaction execution services (Otherwise these services devolve to the City). The Power Management Services Agent Middle Office reports to the Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee. In accordance with the agreements between The City and its Agent, its Agent is authorized to and shall:
• Periodically provide the City with a controls audit report from an independent auditor.
• Perform short term load forecasting, dispatch optimization and execute energy transactions on behalf of the City in accordance with established delegations of authority and compliance requirements set forth by the Energy Trading Authority Policy. The Agent’s staff responsible for submitting CAISO market transactions have been properly trained in alignment with their delegated authority and responsibilities.
• Administer counterparty contracts and manage credit in compliance with the City of Roseville Energy Credit Risk Policy.
• Provide the City with daily reports on individual transaction details, commodity positions, and counterparty credit positions for transactions executed by the Agent.
• Provide the City with periodic risk profile reports addressing the City’s energy risk and compliance with its Energy Hedge Policy. Recommend hedging strategies within time horizons specified by the City for assessment. • Capture the City’s transactions in its risk management systems. • Monitor compliance of transactions with the City of Roseville Energy Trading

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 7 of 9
Authority policy.
• Confirm transactions with the City’s counterparties.
• Mark to Market forward trades for credit exposure purposes. • Provide information to the City for the purpose of billing settlements and development of mid to long term hedging strategies.
• Prepare a monthly report to the City’s Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee detailing compliance with the City’s Risk Policies, suitable for delivery to the RMC and ROC.
• Prepare a monthly policy violations report for the City’s Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee and City Attorney.

4. Scope of Business Activities Governed by this Policy This policy is designed to be broad enough in scope to cover all risks inherent in operating a City owned electric utility. Much of the focus is on power supply cost and retail revenue risk; however, that focus is not to the exclusion of other risks that may materially affect City operations and its ability to provide competitively priced reliable power to its customers.

Roseville is subjected to risk inherent in the business environment in which it operates.

Exposure to risks inherent in the energy markets could result in a multitude of diverse positive or negative consequences for Roseville as noted in section 4.1 below.

4.1 Energy Risk Categories and Mitigations:
i.Commodity Price Risk: Roseville is exposed to risks from volatile natural gas, power market, and environmental prices. These risks are mitigated by owned assets and utilizing, fixed price energy and natural gas procurement requirements in the Energy Hedge Policy, future resource acquisition, and the trading controls put in place by the Trading Authority Policy.
ii.Volumetric Risk: This is the risk of mismatch between load (demand) and resources (supply). This risk is especially important for load serving entities, like Roseville, and can result in either insufficient supply or exposure to volatile spot market prices. The price risk is mitigated by the Energy Hedge Policy which does not allow the City to be greatly over - or undersupplied. The risk of insufficient supply is alsomitigated by capacity procurement practices which build in a reserve margin for extreme conditions.
iii.Operational Risk: This is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, equipment, people, and systems. These risks are mitigated through the development of risk management policies and procedures, prudent oversight, separation of duties, and sufficient internal controls and procedures. iv.Counterparty Risk: Counterparties sometimes fail to perform as contracts state due to defaults and bankruptcies. This risk is mitigated by credit management practices in the Credit Risk Policy.
v.Regulatory and Environmental Risk: Changes in regulatory or legislative mandates may require the City to take actions that increase costs. Examples include the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) programs. RPS and GHG risks are addressed by Roseville’s GHG Cap and Trade

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 8 of 9
Program, and the RPS Procurement Plan and Enforcement Plan. Other regulatory risks are addressed in a similar fashion as they arise. vi.Delivery Risk: The potential for disruptions or failures in the physical delivery of energy resources, such as electricity, natural gas, or oil, to the intended destination.

5. Related Policies
i. Supporting policies and procedures are required as outlined below:

Energy Credit Risk Policy
Energy Trading Authority Policy
Energy Hedge Policy
Resolution 17-368 retaining APM for power management services Resolution 16-161 declaring APM as agent for the purposes of risk policies

ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 9 of 9

6. Version History
Version Date Change Tracking
0 11/06/2024 Initial version
1 05/21/2025 Updates – Resolution No. 25-149

ENERGY HEDGE POLICY
Energy Hedge Policy
5/21/2025

ENERGY HEDGE POLICY
Table of Contents

1. Policy Overview .............................................................................................................................. 1

2. Hedging Policy Criteria.................................................................................................................... 1

3. Natural Gas Hedging ....................................................................................................................... 3

4. Risk Measurement and Compliance Reporting ................................................................................ 4

5. Responsibility.................................................................................................................................. 4

6. Related Policies............................................................................................................................... 4

7. Version History ................................................................................................................. 5

ENERGY HEDGE POLICY Page 1 of 5

ENERGY HEDGE POLICY
5/21/2025

1. Policy Overview
The City of Roseville (“City”) Hedge Policy outlines the energy hedging policy (natural gas and electricity) that will guide disciplined hedging of forward energy resources. The hedge policy is designed to reduce volumetric energy rate volatility and to maintain rates within reasonable tolerances. The primary purpose of this policy is to identify specific guidelines and criteria for procuring projected energy needs. These procurement criteria are defined for months, quarters, and calendar years as appropriate in the different parts of the policy.

The policy largely employs a price averaging strategy of declining percentage of energy supply positions held over forward time periods. This strategy protects the City from potential adverse impacts that could result from either significant energy price increases or decreases. The strategy also maintains some elements of procurement to remain flexible. For example, during times of extremely attractive market conditions presenting favorable opportunities for procurement, this policy allows for increasing the amount of forward energy hedged above the stated ranges with the concurrence of the City’s Risk Oversight Committee (ROC). A key component of the policy is a monthly report for the Risk Management Committee and a quarterly report to the City Council and ROC, which is outlined herein.

2. Hedging Policy Criteria

2.1 Rolling Monthly Hedge Ranges
One criterion of this policy is to have energy procured within defined volumetric ranges during the following rolling monthly and quarterly timeframes. These ranges identify the percentage of City’s projected total energy needs that will be procured with fixed price energy over a given period and tenure. For use within this policy, energy needs are considered hedged or procured to the extent that the projected need is met by:
i. Authorized Transactions, as defined in the Roseville Energy Trading Authority Policy
or
Other transactions as Authorized by the City Council, using the process outlined in the Energy Trading Authority Policy. Options with out of the money strike prices may be used to hedge forward volumes, provided they do not account for more than 15% of the projected energy needs in any given month, and they are not more than 50% out of the money at the time of the transaction.

2.2 The City will hedge projected energy needs based on the following criteria:

Lead Time Months 1 to 12 Quarters 5 to 8 Quarters 9 to 12 Hedging Frequency Monthly Quarterly Quarterly
Range (%) 90-110% 70-100% 45-80%

ENERGY HEDGE POLICY Page 2 of 5
i. Lead Time: This is the amount of time from the current period (including the current period). It may be defined in months or quarters. ii. Hedging Frequency: This is the frequency that the hedging period changes.

This is to prevent a situation where Month 36 (the last month of Quarter 12) would have to be hedged at a time when monthly purchases are very illiquid.

It also defines the purchases of hedges, indicating that a one-month hedge could be purchased for each month between Month 1 and Month 12, whereas a whole quarter hedge would be purchased for a period starting Quarter 5. In case of a conflict, monthly frequency has precedence over quarterly.
iii.Range: This is the lower and upper bounds of overall energy needs that will be required to be covered with fixed price energy, and/or up to 15% with call options. If the percentage of overall energy compared to the forecasted 1 in 2 load by the Finance Division for the total lead time is within the bounds, then Roseville is in compliance.
iv.Remediation Period: If non-compliant, the City has 45 days from the date of the violation notice to get back in compliance with the hedging policy.

Deviations that exceed the range will require approval of the ROC and/or City Council, and will be part of the regular reporting to the City Council.

Because the models being used to determine official compliance with this policy are being run by an external entity, the City’s first warning of being out of compliance with this policy may occur when a report is delivered showing it is out of compliance. As such, the City will have 45 days to remedy the out of compliance situation before it is deemed a violation.

2.3 Hedge Timing and Volumetric Minimums
In meeting the overall volumetric criteria, the City will have the following minimum percentages of energy hedged no later than the lead time as identified below:

Time Frame Months Quarters
Lead time 1-12 5-8 9-12
Minimum (%) 70% 50% 30%
For example, on January 1, 2025, the City will have a minimum of 70% of its projected energy needs for each of the following 12 months, January 2025 through December 2025 procured. For Quarter 5, including January, February, and March 2026, a minimum of 50% of the total projected energy shall be procured, whereas minimum thresholds for individual months are not required. This minimum amount can be hedged well before that date based on the ranges in the prior section. As with the Volumetric Lead Time Criteria, a time frame in months takes precedence over a time in quarters.

The City will maintain hedges at the minimum volumetric level for the specified lead times. Any deviation from the monthly minimum volume for the specified lead time will

ENERGY HEDGE POLICY Page 3 of 5
require ROC and/or City Council approval and will be reported to the City Council. It would still be considered compliant if one month in Month 1 through Month 12 was between 70% and 90%, on condition that the average of Month 1 through Month 12 was between 90% and 110%.

The following chart illustrates the volumetric and lead time criteria for energy hedging.

3. Natural Gas Hedging
Natural gas hedging will be a complementary hedging activity for the City’s natural gas fired generation (owned or contracted) or if it enters a transaction that uses a natural gas index price to derive its electricity cost, such as a heat rate product. Such gas related generation or purchase transactions would not be considered energy hedges until the projected gas volumes are procured. The monthly hedge criteria are measured based on total energy exposure for native load (total projected electricity needed for native load minus energy already hedged). This is the criteria required to beconsidered fixed price energy. There are five mechanisms for hedging gas price risk:
i. Call options.
ii. Bilateral financial hedging using ISDA Master Agreements. iii. Fixed price physical gas procurement using ISDA Agreements. iv. Futures contracts based on fixed prices (i.e. NYMEX or ICE). v. Pre-pay gas contracts that act as a daily hedge.

To allow flexibility in overall energy hedging decisions (e.g. economically hedging additional needs via gas contracts versus power purchases), specific sub-targets for natural gas hedging are not set within this policy.

ENERGY HEDGE POLICY Page 4 of 5

4. Risk Measurement and Compliance Reporting
Risk measurement and policy compliance within the volumetric and lead time criteria will be demonstrated on a regular basis in the Power Management Service Agent’s (“Agent’s”) monthly portfolio model risk report. This report will generally cover three years of projections with sevenyear runs performed at least once per year or when market conditions indicate the potential to cost-effectively hedge beyond three years out.

5. Responsibility
It shall be the responsibility of the City Council, ROC, City Manager, and Risk Management Committee to assure compliance with this policy. Implementation of this policy shall be in accordance with the Related Policies, as referenced below.

6. Related Policies
i. Supporting policies and procedures are required as outlined below:

Energy Credit Risk Policy
Energy Risk Management Policy
Energy Trading Authority Policy
Resolution 17-368 retaining APM for power management services Resolution 16-161 declaring APM as agent for the purposes of risk policies

ENERGY HEDGE POLICY Page 5 of 5

7. Version History
Version Date Change Tracking
0 11/06/2024 Initial version
1 05/21/2025 Updates – Resolution No. 25-149

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY

Energy Credit Risk Policy

59/2116/2025 2026

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY
Table of Contents

1. Policy Overview.......................................................................................................................... 1

2. Extension of Credit to Counterparties ........................................................................................ 1

3. Credit Analysis........................................................................................................................... 2

4. Approval Authority..................................................................................................................... 3

5. Credit Trading Restriction Approval Authority ............................................................................ 4

6. Credit Enhancements................................................................................................................. 4

7. Counterparty Credit................................................................................................................. 55

8. Counterparty Credit Reviews.................................................................................................... 65

9. Credit File Documentation and Retention................................................................................. 65

10. Credit Controls and Trading Restrictions................................................................................. 76

11. Receivables/Payables Management ....................................................................................... 87

12. Collateral Management.......................................................................................................... 87

13. Related Policies...................................................................................................................... 87

14. Amendments to the Credit Risk Policy of the City ................................................................... 87

15. Version History....................................................................................................................... 98

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY Page 1 of 88

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY
59/2116/20252026

1. Policy Overview
Managing credit exposure is an important component in overall risk management. Credit risk is defined as the potential loss the City of Roseville (“City”) could incur as a result of non-payment or non-performance by a counterparty. The amount of credit risk in a trading portfolio can be measured, monitored and mitigated in order to maintain the level of credit risk authorized by the City. Forms of credit risk are:
• Payment Risk which is the cost exposure to the value of accounts receivable and accrued receivables (delivered but not invoiced).
• Performance (mark to market) Risk which is the cost exposure of replacing the contractual obligations of open contracts in the relevant marketplace.

As part of risk management, credit risk management is a control and oversight activity. It must remain independent from the trading activity but work closely with the business to ensure that credit policies are implemented and maintained.

The objective of credit risk management is to preserve the capital and liquidity of the City by establishing procedures that define the determinants for granting open lines of credit and managing counterparty credit exposure. The intent of this policy is to reduce counterparty default risk to its lowest acceptable level.

2. Extension of Credit to Counterparties
The credit analysis of each counterparty is to be performed by the Credit Department of the Power Management Services Agent (“Agent”) and submitted with recommendations regarding credit limits to the Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee for approval. The point of contact for the City is the Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee.

The City will manage its counterparty credit risk primarily through diversification, execution with qualified counterparties, the use of standardized trading contracts (EEI, WSPP, NAESB, ISDA), credit and collateral agreements and strict adherence to credit limits. The City will attempt to diversify its portfolio by entering into transactions with numerous counterparties. The Agent will maintain an approved counterparty list.

In negotiating agreements and ongoing contractual terms with counterparties, the Agent as well as the City shall strive to include prudent industry practice credit provisions.

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY Page 2 of 88
These shall include, but are not limited to, explicit netting agreements and provisions granting the Agent the right to call for and receive collateral in the event the counterparty exceeds its approved collateral threshold or suffers a material adverse credit event.

The creditworthiness of each counterparty must be determined through a fundamental analysis of the counterparty’s financial and operational condition.

The credit analysis incorporates two basic components, a business profile (qualitative analysis) and a financial profile (quantitative analysis). A credit limit and a term limit are established as a result of this due diligence process.

3. Credit Analysis – Determination of the Unsecured Credit Limit Counterparties may qualify for the extension of an unsecured credit limit from the City by providing audited financial statements that indicate sufficient financial strength to allow for the extension of an unsecured credit limit and at least one of the following:
i. An issuer rating or a long term unsecured debt rating of at least BB- from Standard & Poor’s or Ba3 from Moody’s for transactions up to one week forward.
ii. An issuer rating or a long term unsecured debt rating of at least BBB- from Standard & Poor’s or Baa3 from Moody’s for transactions beyond one week forward.
iii. In the event that the counterparty does not have a debt rating, the Agent may use their Proprietary Credit Scoring Model to determine an internal rating. An internal rating of at least BB- is required for transactions up to one week forward. An internal rating of at least BBBis required for transactions beyond one week forward. iv. At any time, and regardless of credit ratings, the City Council may authorize transactions with counterparties determined to be beneficial to the City.

Trade and banking references that indicate the company has sufficient history and adequate credit facilities to allow for the issuance of an unsecured credit limit.

The Agent will use the unsecured ratings of Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s when available.

For unrated counterparties two internal credit scoring models should be utilized. • One credit scoring model is designed for public counterparties. This includes generation and transmission cooperatives, distribution cooperatives, municipalities, government agencies, public power agencies, and other not-for-profit counterparties.
• The second credit scoring model is used for assigning a rating to non-public counterparties or for-profit counterparties.

The purpose of two separate credit scoring models is to provide recognition of two distinct

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY Page 3 of 88
business models and the drivers that meaningfully distinguish and measure the financial and credit risks of each.

Once a counterparty has been determined to be creditworthy, an unsecured credit limit may be recommended by the Agent’s credit risk management department up to 5% of tangible net worth, or, in the case of governmental agencies or non-profit wholesale power suppliers, up to 10% of their average free cash flow for the prior two years. In order to help the City make its unsecured credit limit decision, the Agent will provide both the unsecured credit limit recommendation, and an Unconstrained Estimate of Creditworthiness (UEW) (5% of tangible net worth or, if requested by the City, 10% of average free cash flow) when the recommendation is made.

4. Approval Authority
The City has the discretion to set a counterparty’s unsecured credit limit based on the following guidelines. The maximum unsecured credit limit is limited by two factors:
• The lesser of the counterparty’sies S&P and Moody’s ratings, or if unrated, their score under the Agent’s proprietary credit scoring model, used to define a fixed maximum unsecured credit limit.
• This same criterion is used to define a percentage of their UEW:

The table below defines how the unsecured credit limit may be set.

Credit Strength Maximum Unsecured Credit Limit
Rated
Unrated
(Lesser of the Two Limits,
Lesser of Both
Ratings
Minimum of $0)
S&P Moodys
Agent
Internal
Rating Fixed Value % of UEW
>= A- >= A3 >= A- $25,000,000 65%
BBB+ Baa1 BBB+ $15,000,000 50%
BBB Baa2 BBB $10,000,000 50%
BBB- Baa3 BBB- $2,500,000 35%
<BBB- <Baa3 <BBB- $0 35%
Levels of authorization at City’s discretion:
i. City’s Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee: Up to $10,000,000. ii. City’s Electric Utility Director: Approve up to the amount in the above table. iii. City Council: Amounts exceeding the above table.

The City Council may approve collateral threshold tables within master agreements in excess of the amounts in the above table. This action establishes a maximum unsecured credit limit for the counterparty based on their credit rating.

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY Page 4 of 88
Once an unsecured credit limit has been established by either the City’s Electric Utility Director or the City Council, the City’s Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee may issue a working credit limit at any level up to the amount established.

5. Credit Trading Restriction Approval Authority
The City’s Assistant Electric Utility Director of Finance and Customer Care will have the authority to approve Credit Trading Restrictions. The City’s approvals will take into consideration Credit Trading Restriction recommendations provided by the Agent’s Credit Department. The Electric Utility Director designee or Assistant Electric Utility Director of Finance and Customer Care will have the authority to make such approved changes to the counterparty Credit Trading Restrictions via the Agent’s Credit Portal.

The Agent’s recommended trading restrictions will be distributed and posted to the Credit Portal.

6. 6. Credit Enhancements
Counterparties that do not qualify for an extension of an unsecured credit limit must post at least one of the following types of security prior to the execution of a transaction:

6.1 Corporate Guarantee: Counterparties may provide a guarantee from a third party that meets the creditworthiness requirements noted above. If a counterparty provides such a guarantee, the amount of any unsecured credit limit will be determined through an analysis of the financial statements of the guarantor. All guarantees must be in a format that is acceptable to the City.

6.2 Letter of Credit: Counterparties may provide an irrevocable letter of credit for an amount sufficient to cover the related transactions. Letters of credit must be issued by a U.S. bank or a financial institution or a U.S. branch of a foreign bank with a rating of at least an A from Standard & Poor’s or A2 from Moody’s.

6.3 Prepayment (margin): Counterparties may provide a prepayment or cash margin deposit that is sufficient to cover the related transactions.

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY Page 5 of 88

7. 7. Counterparty Credit
Establishing limits and monitoring credit information should be done separately from energy transaction activities to ensure appropriate segregation of duties within the City.

7.1 Credit Limit: Defined as the sum of:
i. The approved amount of the unsecured credit limit.
ii. The value of any approved guarantees held, providing additional security or assurance beyond the unsecured limit.
iii. The value of any letter of credit or cash collateral held. iv. The approved value of any other type of collateral.

7.2 Available Credit: The dollar amount remaining open on the working credit limit approved for a counterparty.

7.27.3 Exposure: The total amount of a counterparty’s credit exposure defined as the sum of:
i. The dollar value of all amounts invoiced and unpaid. ii. The dollar amount of all deliveries that have not yet been invoiced. iii. The marked to market value of all forward trades.
iv. Less all offsetting amounts that are supported by legally binding netting agreements or Edison Electric Institute (EEI) agreements.

7.4 Renewable Energy Credit (REC) Transactions
This section clarifies how the existing credit risk framework applies to Renewable Energy Credit (“REC”) transactions. REC transactions shall be evaluated based on counterparty creditworthiness, contract tenor, pricing structure, settlement structure, and resulting credit exposure. Credit exposure may include invoiced and unpaid amounts, uninvoiced deliveries, and mark-to-market or replacement-cost exposure associated with forward obligations, net of enforceable netting rights.

REC transactions may only be executed with counterparties that have satisfied applicable credit review, counterparty approval, credit limit, and, if applicable, credit support requirements under this Policy. Credit exposure shall be managed through approved credit limits, credit restrictions, contractual protections, settlement/payment terms, collateral or other credit enhancements where appropriate, and ongoing monitoring.

If sufficient financial information is not available to support an unsecured credit determination, the counterparty may be assigned a zero-dollar unsecured credit limit. REC transactions with such counterparties may proceed only if supported by acceptable credit enhancements, deliverybefore-payment terms, secured structures, or other contractual protections

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY Page 6 of 88
approved under this Policy, including City Council approval where required.

Any such determination shall be documented in the applicable credit file.

Shorter-term REC transactions may generally be managed through approved working credit limits and standard contractual protections when expected exposure is limited and adequately supported. Longer-term REC transactions, or transactions with greater forward or replacement-cost exposure, may require additional credit review, collateral, guarantees, letters of credit, prepayment, or other commercially reasonable credit support based on tenor, exposure, pricing structure, market conditions, liquidity, and counterparty creditworthiness.

Any transaction-specific credit determinations, including interim working limits, secured structures, credit enhancement alternatives, or exceptions to standard requirements, shall be documented in accordance with the Credit File Documentation, Credit Controls, and Trading Restrictions requirements of this Policy.

8. Counterparty Credit Reviews
New counterparties are to be evaluated for creditworthiness by the Agent’s credit risk management department prior to any transactions. Unsecured credit limits up to $10,000,000 may be recommended by the Executive Director of Credit (or similar position title) of the Agent.

Existing counterparties are to be formally reviewed and documented by the Agent’s credit risk management department on a yearly basis at a minimum. More frequent reviews may be necessary, at the discretion of the Agent’s credit risk management department or at the request of the City.

Counterparties sharing a common parent or affiliation will be assigned to a group. A credit limit will be assigned to the group with individual credit limits being assigned to each counterparty within the group. The aggregate credit limit of these counterparties will not exceed the established group limit.

9. Credit File Documentation and Retention
Credit analysis, approvals and denials must be documented in writing and all counterparty information shall be contained in formal credit files that are maintained at the offices of the Agent. These credit files are expected to contain audited financial statements and a credit review analysis report with a credit limit recommendation signed by the Executive Director of Credit (or similar position title) of the Agent. These files should also contain as much of the following as possible:
• At least the two most recent years of audited financial statement information, if the counterparty does not have publicly available financial information. (i.e. counterparties that do not file with the SEC).
• Rating information as published by Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s.

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY Page 7 of 88
• General industry information, if applicable.
•

10. Credit Controls and Trading Restrictions
An approved list of trading counterparties noting working credit limits, available credit, and tenor restrictions is distributed each business day to all traders either via e-mail or through the Agent’s website. Under no circumstances should a trade be executed with a counterparty that does not appear on the approved list of trading counterparties. No credit sleeving transactions shall be executed.

The Executive Director of Credit (or similar position title) of the Agent is to provide general oversight over the credit function, reporting any credit issues to the Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee who will ensure dissemination to the Risk Management Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee of the City.

Entering unsecured transactions with a counterparty that will cause the total credit exposure to that counterparty to exceed the available credit will be allowed only if new working credit limits are set in writing. No new transactions are to be entered into with counterparties that have exceeded their working credit limits except as they may mitigate (offset) existing exposure, contingent upon a netting agreement. Any new unsecured, unauthorized transactions entered into with a counterparty that has credit exposure in excess of its assigned working credit limit will subject the trader to disciplinary action.

All violations of this policy will be reported to the Risk Management Committee of the Agent.

The Agent will also report such violations to the City Attorney and the City’s Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee, who will be responsible for dissemination to the City’s Risk Management Committee in a timely manner. If warranted, the City’s Risk Management Committee could escalate the issue to the City’s Risk Oversight Committee to develop remediation procedures and/or initiate disciplinary action.

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY Page 8 of 88

11. Receivables/Payables Management
Unless otherwise instructed by the City, the Agent will consider all receivables/payables to be settled on the payment due date of the executed transaction.

As is generally accepted accounting practice, if necessary, a reserve will be established to allow for potential bad debts. This reserve will be determined jointly by the Executive Director of Credit (or similar position title) at Agent and the Finance Director of the City.

12. Collateral Management
The Agent is authorized to give credit information on the City to counterparties to establish credit approvals. The Agent will coordinate with the Finance Department of the City regarding the issuance or receipt of collateral to support a transaction. Any collateral that is received by the Agent for the City will be held by the City.

13. Related Policies
i. Supporting policies and procedures are required as outlined below:

Energy Risk Management Policy
Energy Trading Authority Policy
Energy Hedge Policy
Resolution 17-368 retaining APM for power management services Resolution 16-161 declaring APM as agent for the purposes of risk policies

14. 14. Amendments to the Credit Risk Policy of the City From time to time, it may be necessary to make changes to the Electric Energy Credit Risk Policy of the City. Amendments to this policy will be made by City Council action.

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY Page 9 of 88

15. 15. Version History
Version Date Change Tracking
0 11/06/2024 Initial version
1 05/21/2025 Updates – Resolution No. 25-149

1.1 09/16/2026 Added REC transaction clarification to Section 7.4

ENERGY CREDIT RISK POLICY Page 10 of 88

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY
Energy Trading Authority Policy
59/2116/2025
2026

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY
Table of Contents

1. Policy Overview.......................................................................................................................... 1

2. Execution Authority ................................................................................................................... 1

3. Requirements ............................................................................................................................ 1

4. Non-Permissible Transactions .................................................................................................... 2

5. Standard Transactions................................................................................................................ 2

6. Non-standard Transactions ........................................................................................................ 5

7. Aggregated Dollar Authority Limits............................................................................................. 5

8. Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................. 11

9. Responsibility........................................................................................................................... 11

10. Related Responsibilities.......................................................................................................... 11

11. Version History……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….12

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 1 of 12

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY
59/2116/20252026

1. Policy Overview
The Energy Trading Authority Policy (“Policy”) is the framework containing the governing rules and requirements associated with the City’s energy related transactions. The Policy also specifies the list of authorities or powers granted by the City Council of the City of Roseville (“City”) to the City Manager and key personnel that can execute energy related transactions.

1.1 The Energy Trading Authority Policy includes directives that address the following:
i. The City’s intention regarding hedging and speculating. ii. Who has authority to execute transactions.
iii. The commodities and products that can be transacted. iv. The authorized lead-time and term for each transaction. v. Counterparty contract and credit requirements.
vi. Other relevant factors associated with due diligence in authorizing transactions to be executed.

2. Execution Authority
The City Council granted the City Manager the ability to delegate his/her authority to the Electric Utility Director and Power Management Services Agent (“Agent”) at his/her discretion. The City Manager may also choose to amend the extent of authority granted to the Electric Utility Director and Agent at their discretion if it does not surpass the limit of their authority.

The Transaction Authority Matrix outlines the Execution Authority Limits and defines the trading limits applicable to purchases and sales for each authority level in sections 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3.

All transactions must be executed via a recorded communication method. Recorded communications must be maintained and controlled by personnel who are independent of the trading function. Any request by the City for the Agent to execute on its behalf a transaction beyond the Agent’s authority must be documented in accordance with this Policy.

3. Requirements

3.1 Credit Requirements
i. Roseville Electric Utility shall not intentionally exceed the credit limit associated with each counterparty. Entering unsecured transactions with a counterparty that has total credit exposure greater than or equal to its open line of credit, and the total of any security currently provided will be managed according to the City of Roseville’s Energy Credit Risk Policy.
a. Since credit exposure is a function of not only the positions traded, but also a function of market pricing and volatility, credit exposure to

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 2 of 12
a counterparty may unintentionally exceed a credit limit purely due to changes in the forward market.
b. All Renewable Energy Credit (“REC”) transactions, including multiyear REC agreements, remain subject to the City of Roseville’s Energy Credit Risk Policy, including requirements related to approved counterparty status, credit limits, pricing structure, forward exposure, mark-to-market or replacement-cost exposure, and the use of credit enhancements when unsecured credit is unavailable or additional credit support is required.

3.2 Contract Requirements
i. Transactions with counterparties shall only be permitted if the City has an active, valid, and executed agreement enabling such trading activity with that counterparty.
ii. Long form confirmations may be used as a valid agreement in lieu of a permanent agreement, when necessary, if approved by the Roseville City Council.

4. Non-Permissible Transactions

4.1 Sleeving
i. No sleeving transactions for credit or contract purposes shall be executed.

Note: Credit Sleeving is an arrangement where a more financially reputable entity acts as middleman for a smaller, undercapitalized entity in the purchase or sale of power. Contract sleeving is an arrangement where an entity acts as a middleman between two entities to bridge a contract gap that exists between the two entities.

4.2 Speculative
i. The primary purpose of trading activities shall be for hedging and portfolio optimization (including participation in arbitrage opportunities). However, the Energy Hedge Policy does allow the City to take advantage of market opportunities through transactions that could in the strictest sense be labeled speculation if those transactions expose the City to additional risk. The Energy Hedge Policy defines what is permissible in this regard.

5. Standard Transactions
Types of transactions that are executed by Roseville or its Agent must be consistent with City Council resolutions, all applicable laws, and rules and regulations. These may include, but not limited to the following:

5.1 Enabling and Master Agreements

5.2 Purchase and Sales of Energy Products such as:

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 3 of 12

5.2.1 Electric Power, Capacity, including Transmission (Financial and Physical Contracts)
i. Purchase energy or capacity to serve load above what is expected to be generated or purchased from existing resources, or if energy or capacity purchases are more economical than existing resources.
ii. Sell existing capacity or energy that is expected to be in excess of the City’s requirements.
iii. Execute financial transactions, including CAISO virtual transactions, to fix the price of variable commodity purchases or sales.
iv. Purchase from the CAISO markets to meet the City’s load requirements or sell into the CAISO markets energy in excess of the City’s load requirements.
v. Purchase call options to limit price exposure on short power positions. vi. Sell call options or tolling agreements on capacity that is expected to be in excess of the City’s resource requirements.
vii. Purchase a “floor” to limit price exposure on long power positions. viii. Sell a “floor” to offset a portion of the price of the purchase of a call. ix. Execute physical spread transactions at authorized locations. x. Transmission purchases are to be as firm as possible to reasonably assure the delivery of the commodity at the firmness transacted.

Notes:
• Physical Contracts are contracts that require sellers to produce and deliver the commodity to the buyers. Financial Contracts do not involve a direct physical delivery of a commodity; instead, they use cash settlements, the buyer either gains or loses credit against the seller based on the difference between the agreed “entry” price and the “final” settlement price.

5.2.2 Natural Gas including Transportation (Financial and Physical Contracts)
i. Purchase natural gas and transportation that is expected to be needed to fuel the Roseville facilities. Enter into imbalance and storage agreements if deemed beneficial to fuel Roseville facilities.
ii. Sell surplus gas, or release transportation capacity, if more economic energy is available for purchase.
iii. Purchase call options to limit price exposure on short natural gas positions.

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 4 of 12
iv. Sell call options or tolling agreements on capacity that is expected to be in excess of the City’s resource requirements.
v. Purchase a “floor” to limit price exposure on long natural positions. vi. Sell a “floor” to offset a portion of the price of the purchase of call options listed in item (5) above.
vii. Transportation purchases are to be as firm as possible to reasonably assure the delivery of the commodity at the firmness transacted.

5.2.3 Environmental Compliance Instruments
i. Purchase environmental compliance instruments, including but not limited to Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) credits, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) allowances, GHG offsets, and Federal Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) and Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emission allowances expected to be necessary to optimize the operation of the City’s resource portfolio.
ii. Sell environmental compliance instruments, including but not limited to Carbon Free Attributes, LCFS credits, GHG allowances, GHG offsets, and Federal SO2 and NOx Emission Allowances deemed unnecessary for efficient operation of the City’s resource portfolio.

5.2.4 Renewable Energy Credits (RECs)
i. Purchase or sell RECs as required to meet compliance requirements.

5.2.5 Congestion Revenue Rights
i. Execute Congestion Revenue Rights (CRR) to manage congestion price risk.

5.2.6 Ancillary Services
i. Purchase bilateral ancillary services to meet the City’s load requirements or sell bilateral ancillary services in excess of the City’s load requirements. ii. Purchase CAISO ancillary services (spinning reserves, non-spinning reserves, regulation up, and regulation down) to meet the City’s load requirements or sell CAISO ancillary services in excess of the City's load requirements.

5.2.7 Movement of Energy To and From
i. CAISO (NP15 and SP15), BANC (Balancing Area of Northern California), Mid-Columbia, John Day, Big Eddy and COB.
a. Execute physical spread transactions at authorized locations. b. For financial electricity transactions, authorized locations include CAISO NP15 EZ Gen Hub, CAISO SP15 EZ Gen Hub, BANC, MidPage 221 of 1216 ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 5 of 12
Columbia, John Day, Big Eddy, and COB. These same locations are authorized for physical electricity transactions to the extent delivery can be reasonably expected.
c. Additional physical and financial locations include owned-generation locations within the CAISO, and CAISO interties for import and export transactions.

5.2.8 Movement of Natural Gas To and From
i. PG&E CityGate, Malin, Topock, Henry Hub, and the SoCal Border. a. Execute physical spread transactions at authorized locations. b. For physical and financial natural gas transactions, authorized locations include PG&E CityGate, Malin, Topock and the SoCal Border.
c. Henry Hub is authorized for financial natural gas hedging, as well as Henry Hub to the PG&E CityGate Basis.

5.2.9 Energy Exchange:

An energy exchange transaction is defined as any transaction in which similar quantities of energy are exchanged across locations or commodities to lower cost, reduce risk, or to increase reliability.

6. Non-Standard Transactions
City staff may enter non-standard transactions with City Council’s approval. Non-standard transactions fall outside the scope of the defined “standard” transactions; these may include new opportunities that involve the following:
i. New commodities
ii. Locations outside of defined trading boundaries
iii. Pilot programs

6.1 The approval process for non-standard transactions are defined by the following:
i. Transaction Proposal:

The proposal is the responsibility of the person or business group proposing the transaction. The proposal should address the business need, risks, trading controls, valuation methodology, accounting methodology, operations workflow/methodology, and assessment of legal and regulatory issues.
ii. City Council Review:

The Risk Oversight Committee (“ROC”) will perform a review on behalf of, and make a recommendation to, the City Council on the benefits and risks of the proposed transaction. The City Council will assess the proposed transaction and decide whether to add the proposed transaction to the approved list.

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 6 of 12

7. Aggregated Dollar Authority Limits
The aggregated dollar authority limit specifies the corresponding maximum dollars each authority level is allowed to authorize for forward transactions for electric power, transmission, natural gas, natural gas transportation, environmental compliance instruments, RECs and Energy Attributes, congested revenue rights, ancillary services, and energy exchanges. See Authority Matrix for details.

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 7 of 12

7.1 Authority Matrix:

Title Source of
Authority
Products Term Delivery
Lead
Time
Termination
Limits
Aggregate Dollar Authority
Limit
Power &
Transmission
Nat. Gas &
Transportation
Environmental
Compliance
Instruments
(e.g., LCFS,
GHG Credits)
RECs and
Energy
Attributes
Congestion
Revenue
Rights
Ancillary
Services
Energy
Exchanges Net Gross
City
Council
State Law,
City
Charter
X X X X X X X No
Limit
No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit
City
Manager
City
Council X X X X X X X
< 6
Years
< 6
Years
< 6
Years $500,000,000 $700,000,000
Utility
Director
City
Council X X
< 3
Month
<6
Months
< 1
Year $5,000,000 $7,000,000
Agent’s
CEO
City
Council X X X X X
< 1
Month
< 6
Weeks
< 2
Months $23,000,000 $31,000,000
i. Authority Matrix Explanations:
• The gross aggregate limits represent the maximum allowable total dollars based on the absolute values of all forward purchases and sales.
• The net aggregate limits represent the maximum allowable total dollars between all forward purchases and sales. • Delivery Lead Time represents the time period from the date a trade is executed to the start of the trade. • Unless otherwise stated, the dollar limits are based upon electric power only and do not include transmission, however, the Term, Lead Time, and Quantity limits do apply to transmission. • Termination Limit refers to the last day of the term from the execution day of the contract. • Power and Natural Gas products typically include transmission and transportation respectively.

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 8 of 12

7.2 Authority Matrix for Agent’s Short-Term Traders:

Product Source of
Authority
Per Transaction
Limits
Per Trading Day Limits
(Up to)
Aggregated Limits
(Up to)
Term Delivery
Lead Time
Termination
Limits
Volume
Size
Total Cost
($)
Volume
Size
Total Cost
($)
Total
Volume
Net Total
($)
Gross Total
($)
Power and
Transmission
City
Council
(Can be
Modified
by City
Manager)
> 1 Week
< 1 Month
< 6
Weeks
< 2
Months
8,400 MWh
per Week
$1,050,000
per Week
111,600
MWh
$14,000,000
446,400
MWh
$17,000,000 $21,000,000
> 1 Day
< 1 Week
2,400 MWh
per Day
$600,000
per Day
33,600 MWh $8,400,000
< 1 Day 4,800 MWh
per Day
No Max.
(Keep Lights
On)
No Max.
(Keep Lights
On)
No Max.
(Keep Lights
On)
Natural Gas
and
Transportation
< 1 Month
< 6
Weeks
< 2
Months
12,000

MMBTU/D
X 775,000
MMBTU
$6,200,000 775,000
MMBTU
$6,200,000 $9,300,000
> 1 Day
< 1 Week
40,000

MMBTU/D
X 280,000
MMBTU
$4,200,000 400,000
MMBTU
$4,000,000 $6,000,000
< 1 Day < 1
Week
< 2
Weeks
50,000

MMBTU/D
X 150,000
MMBTU
$3,000,000 150,000
MMBTU
$2,000,000 $4,000,000

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 9 of 12
i. Authority Matrix for Agent’s Short-Term Traders Matrix Explanations:
a. Power and Transmission Transactions:
• Transaction Limits represent the MWh volume per period labeled in the tableand total dollars per period (as labeled above) for each transaction executed. • Per Trading Day Limits represent the total MWH volume and dollars for all transactions executed in a trading day.
• The transaction term limit for the Agent of < 1 Day covers individual daily transactions as well as executed transactions for more than one day to accommodate weekends or holidays, which could have terms up to 3 days for a normal weekend and up to 5 days for a holiday weekend.
• The gross aggregate limits represent the maximum allowable total dollars based on the absolute values of all forward purchases and sales. • The net aggregate limits represent the maximum allowable total dollars between all forward purchases and sales.
• Delivery Lead Time represents the time period from the date executionto the first day of the term of the trade.
• Unless otherwise stated, the dollar limits are based upon electric power only and do not include transmission, however, the Term, Lead Time, and Quantity limits do apply to transmission.
• Termination Limit refers to the time period between the date of execution and the last day of the term of the trade.
b. Natural Gas and Transportation Transactions:
• Transaction Limits represent the daily MMBtu volume for each transaction executed.
• Per Trading Day Limits represent the total MMBtu volume and dollars for all transactions executed in a trading day.
• The transaction term limit for the Agent of < 1 Day covers individual daily transactions as well as executed transactions for more than one day to accommodate weekends or holidays, which could have terms up to 3 days for a normal weekend and up to 5 days for a holiday weekend.
• The gross aggregate limits represent the maximum allowable total dollars based on the absolute values of all forward purchases and sales. • The net aggregate limits represent the maximum allowable total dollars between all forward purchases and sales.
• Lead time represents the time period from the date a trade is executed to the start of thetrade.
• One monthly NYMEX contract contains 10,000 MMBtu.
• The dollar limits are based upon commodity gas only and do not include transportation, however, the Term, Lead Time, and Quantity limits do apply to transportation.
• Termination limit refers to the last day of the term from the execution day of the contract.

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 10 of 12

7.3 CAISO Trading Authority Matrix for Agent’s Short-Term Traders:

Products Delivery Lead Time Term MW Size $/MWh
Generation
Awards
As Required by CAISO 1 Operating Day 230 CAISO Price Cap Demand
Awards
None
Inter SC Transactions
(IST)
See Matrix Explanation
CAISO
Imports
As Required by CAISO 1 Operating Day
230
CAISO Price Cap
CAISO
Exports
375
Ancillary
Services
200
Congestion Revenue
Rights
None
i. CAISO Trading Authority Matrix for Agent’s Short-Term Traders Matrix Explanations:
• Generation Award Limits are per generating unit within the CAISO. • Demand Award Limits are per each load location.
• An Inter SC Trade is an energy quantity traded from one SC to another SC for a specific hour and location, therefore Inter SC Trades may be submitted to the ISO but are not monitored as they are a direct result of the bilateral trade executed between the SC’s. Only the bilateral transaction will be monitored in accordance with the appropriate authority matrix.
• CAISO Imports and Exports are by location and are each monitored separately. • Limits for Ancillary Service Awards apply to the Regulation and Operating (Spinning and Non- Spinning) Reserve Market. Limits for ancillary services transacted bilaterally are addressed in the power authority matrix. • Only Congestion Revenue Rights that are bought and sold via the long-term, annual and monthly auctions or in the secondary market are monitored per the limits above. This excludes congestion revenue rights allocated in the Annual Allocation.
• Term applies to either the calendar year or planning year.

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 11 of 12

8. Acknowledgements

8.1 Violations and Sanctions –
i. Violations of this Policy must not occur. Should it be deemed that a violation did occur due to the actions of City employees, the Agent will notify the City’s Electric Utility Financial Administrator or designee and the City Attorney of such violations. Those individuals will have the responsibility to bring the violations to the Risk Management Committee for discussion. If warranted, the Risk Management Committee may escalate the issue to the Risk Oversight Committee to develop remediation procedures.

8.2 Policy Effective –
ii. This Policy is in effect upon the City Council’s approval and shall remain in effect until a replacement policy has been approved by the City Council superseding this Policy.

9. Responsibility
It shall be the responsibility of the City Council, through the duly appointed Risk Oversight Committee, Risk Management Committee and the City Manager to assure compliance with this policy.

10. Related Policies
i. Supporting policies and procedures are required as outlined below:

Energy Credit Risk Policy
Energy Risk Management Policy
Energy Hedge Policy
Resolution 17-368 retaining APM for power management services Resolution 16-161 declaring APM as agent for the purposes of risk policies

ENERGY TRADING AUTHORITY POLICY Page 12 of 12

11. Version History
Version Date Change Tracking
0 11/06/2024 Initial version
1 05/21/2025 Updates – Resolution No. 25-149

1.1 09/16/2026 Added REC credit requirements clarification to Section 3.1

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 9/16/2026
Item #: VI.11
File #: 0800-03
Item ID: 2026-733
Title: Electric Utility Wildfire Mitigation Plan and Independent Evaluator Report Contact: Tom Pontes 916-774-5550 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends accepance of the Roseville Electric Utility (REU) 2026-2029 Wildfire Mitigation Plan (WMP) and accompanying Independent Evaluator Report. The WMP outlines REU's programs and practices to reduce wildfire risk, protect public and employee safety, and maintain the reliability of Roseville's electric system in accordance with California Public Utilities Code section 8387. Beginning in 2026, state law requires publicly owned electric utilities to submit a WMP to the California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board at least once every four years according to an established schedule. REU is included in the 2026 reporting cycle. While REU remains outside CPUC-designated Tier 2 and Tier 3 High Fire-Threat Districts, the WMP incorporates updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone mapping and associated monitoring and inspection activities. Charles River Associates independently evaluated the Plan and concluded that it meets the statutory requirements for comprehensiveness. There is no cost associated with the City Council's acceptance of the 2026-2029 Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Roseville Electric Utility 2026-2029 Wildfire Mitigation Plan and accompanying Independent Evaluator Report and authorize staff to submit the approved Plan and related materials to the California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board in accordance with applicable state requirements.

BACKGROUND
The purpose of Roseville Electric Utility's (REU) Wildfire Mitigation Plan (WMP) is to promote public and employee safety, maintain electric system reliability, and reduce the potential for utility facilities to cause or contribute to a wildfire. Public Utilities Code section 8387 establishes wildfire mitigation planning requirements for publicly owned electric utilities. State law amended these requirements in 2025, changing the WMP reporting schedule from annual submissions to at least once every four years according to a schedule established by the California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board (WSAB). REU is included in the 2026 reporting cycle.

The 2026-2029 WMP reflects updated wildfire conditions within Roseville. While REU's service territory remains outside CPUC-designated Tier 2 and Tier 3 High Fire-Threat Districts, updated 2025 Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps identify Moderate fire-hazard areas on the western side of Roseville and Moderate-toHigh fire-hazard areas on the eastern side. REU has incorporated these areas into its wildfire risk assessment and increased monitoring and inspection activities in areas of increased hazard. Charles River Associates (CRA) independently evaluated the 2026-2029 WMP as required by PUC section 8387. CRA concluded that the WMP meets the statutory requirements for comprehensiveness and that REU demonstrates a proactive approach to wildfire risk management.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no cost associated with the City Council's acceptance of the 2026-2029 Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to this action because it does not involve approval of a project that may result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. This update and verification of Roseville Electric Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan constitutes administrative activity and organizational planning, and is therefore not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA Guidelines §§15060(c)(3) and15378. No further environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Tom Pontes, Assistant Electric Utility Director
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. REU2025WMP_Expert_Witness_Report_FINAL-1

2. Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2026
REVIEWERS:

Tom Pontes, Electric Department - All Created/Initiated - 8/19/2026 Tom Pontes, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/19/2026 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/20/2026 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 8/20/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/2/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 9/2/2026

Prepared for:

Roseville Electric Utility
Roseville 2026-2029 Wildfire
Mitigation Plan Recertification Expert Witness Review
Prepared by:

Charles River Associates
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
Date: May 2026

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page i
Disclaimer
The conclusions set forth herein are based on independent research and publicly available material. Any opinion expressed herein shall not amount to any form of guarantee that the authors or Charles River Associates has determined or predicted future events or circumstances and no such reliance may be inferred or implied. The authors and Charles River Associates accept no duty of care or liability of any kind whatsoever to any party, and no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any party as a result of decisions made, or not made, or actions taken, or not taken, based on this paper. Detailed information about Charles River Associates, a trademark of CRA International, Inc., is available at www.crai.com.

Copyright 2026 Charles River Associates

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page ii
Table of contents
Executive Summary............................................................................................................................. 1

1. Introduction / Utility Overview.................................................................................................... 1

2. Methodology and Approach ....................................................................................................... 1

3. PUC § 8387 Review of Adherence.............................................................................................. 2

3.1. Requirement Overview ..................................................................................................... 2

3.2. Review of WMP Elements ................................................................................................ 4

4. Summary of WSAB Advisory Opinions and REU Applicability .............................................. 8

4.1. Risk Identification.............................................................................................................. 8

4.2. Preemptive De-energization ............................................................................................. 8

5. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 9

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page 1
Executive Summary
Roseville Electric Utility (REU) contracted with Charles River Associates (CRA) to conduct an evaluation of their 2026-2029 Wildfire Mitigation Plan (WMP) in advance of its certification by REU. The following Report describes the review of REU’s WMP for adherence to California Public Utilities Code (PUC) §8387(b)(2) for publicly owned electric utilities and to assess the actions taken by REU to reduce ignitions and impacts of wildfire on its equipment and operations.

1. Introduction / Utility Overview
REU, overseen by the Roseville City Council, provides electric service to the City of Roseville in Placer County. REU serves approximately 67,500 customers across a service territory of roughly 43 square miles. The REU service territory does not fall within any of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Tier 2 or Tier 3 Hire Fire Threat Districts (HFTDs). As of 2025, CAL FIRE maps have been issued by the State Fire Marshal which identify updated Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ). These maps indicate some areas of Moderate to High hazard areas on the eastern border of the City of Roseville. REU has taken proactive steps to prepare for and mitigate potential wildfire-related impacts, including increased monitoring of assets in those areas identified with increased hazard.

The terrain across REU’s service territory is predominantly flat and largely consists of urban and suburban development. Areas with continuous flammable vegetation are limited, contributing to the utility’s overall low wildfire risk profile.

REU maintains two generation plants, two 230-kV substations, and approximately 978 miles distribution lines, of which approximately 85 percent (834 miles) are underground (as reported in the 2025 WMP). REU is a member of the Balancing Authority of Northern California (BANC), which is responsible for balancing generation load and coordinating system operations with neighboring balancing authorities. BANC contracts with the Western Area Power Administration for bulk power supply. Electricity procured through BANC is delivered to REU via BANC transmission facilities that interconnect with REU’s system at the utility’s two 230-kV substations.

REU’s service territory experiences a seasonal wildfire risk pattern typical of California’s Central Valley. Weather conditions that can contribute to wildfire spread generally begin in April, although vegetation conditions typically do not become sufficiently dry to support ignition until May. Elevated wildfire risk conditions generally persist through October, with the driest conditions most commonly occurring between August and October. During the summer months, the Sacramento Valley may experience atmospheric circulation patterns, commonly referred to as “northers,” which can contribute to increased wildfire risk during the fire season.

2. Methodology and Approach
This Report is the product of CRA’s assessments of Roseville’s WMP, discussions with REU and data request responses. The Report includes an assessment of the completeness of Roseville’s WMP, its adherence to PUC § 8387, and its alignment with industry best practices and expert opinion and lessons learned.

To perform this assessment, CRA adopted the following approach:
• Review the WMP: CRA reviewed Roseville’s WMP and other relevant publicly released or submitted supporting documents.

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page 2
• Submit Data Request: Data requests focused on any additional internal documents or Standard Operating Procedures to further illustrate safety and wildfire practices that may not be publicly available due to security reasons. • Interpret documents and compare against PUC §8387: Utilizing the WMP and supporting material, CRA assessed planning and preparedness against the intended goal of PUC 8387 to determine if REU’s plan met the baseline requirements.

Additionally, recommendations for improvement or best practices were provided, regardless of code language.
• Review advisory opinions from the Wildfire Safety Advisory Board (WSAB):

The WSAB releases an annual report after reviewing a subset of submitted WMPs.

This Report provides updated advisory opinions, feedback on potential improvements or approach, and shares lessons learned from working groups and ongoing feedback throughout the year. While utilities are not required to incorporate WSAB opinions, considering WMP input can help strengthen processes, refine WMP language, and clarify expectations and overall mitigation strategies. Relevant details from WSAB advisories were included in recommendations for improving REU’s processes and approach.

3. PUC § 8387 Review of Adherence

3.1. Requirement Overview
PUC § 8387(b)(2) identifies the statutory requirements for WMPs. These requirements form the basis for this Report. Table 1 summarizes each statutory element and presents CRA’s findings and areas with recommendations. Additional detail and the full assessment are provided in Section 3.2.

CRA’s findings fell into two categories: Complete and Complete with Recommendations. A finding of Complete indicates that the WMP adhered to the statutory requirement in the PUC.

A finding of Complete with Recommendations provides detail on industry best practices or other suggestions toward continuous improvement of the Plan.

CRA provides recommendations for consideration only and does not make claims that these changes would further reduce risk, nor does it imply that not implementing these recommendations would expose REU to additional risk.

Table 1 - Overview of PUC 8387 Elements
Element Definition Finding
(A) Staff Responsibilities An accounting of the responsibilities of persons responsible for executing the plan. Complete
(B) Plan Objectives The objectives of the wildfire mitigation plan. Complete (C) Wildfire Risk
Reduction Strategy
Description
A description of the preventive strategies and programs to be adopted by the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative to minimize the risk of its electrical lines and equipment causing catastrophic wildfires, including
consideration of dynamic climate change risks.

Complete
(D) Evaluation Metrics
A description of the metrics the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative plans to use to evaluate the wildfire mitigation plan’s performance and the assumptions that underlie the use of those metrics.

Complete –
recommendations

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page 3
Element Definition Finding
(E) Application of
Metrics to Evaluate Plan
A discussion of how the application of previously identified metrics to previous wildfire mitigation plan performances has informed the wildfire mitigation plan.

Complete
(F) Recloser and
Deenergization
Protocols
Protocols for disabling reclosers and deenergizing portions of the electrical distribution system that consider the associated impacts on public safety, as well as protocols related to mitigating the public safety impacts of those protocols, including impacts on critical first responders and on health and communication infrastructure.

Complete
(G) Deenergization
Customer Notification
Procedure
Appropriate and feasible procedures for notifying a customer who may be impacted by the deenergizing of electrical lines.

The procedures shall direct notification to all public safety offices, critical first responders, health care facilities, and operators of telecommunications infrastructure with premises within the footprint of potential deenergization for a given event.

Complete
(H) Vegetation
Management Plans for vegetation management. Complete
(I) Asset Inspections Plans for inspections of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s electrical infrastructure. Complete (J) Wildfire Risks and
Drivers
A list that identifies, describes, and prioritizes all wildfire risks, and drivers for those risks, throughout the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s service territory.

The list shall include, but not be limited to, both of the following:
(i) Risks and risk drivers associated with design,
construction, operation, and maintenance of the local
publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s equipment and facilities.
(ii) Particular risks and risk drivers associated with
topographic and climatological risk factors throughout
the different parts of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s service territory.

Complete
(K) Geographic Risk
Identification
Identification of any geographic area in Roseville's service territory that is a higher wildfire threat than is identified in a commission fire threat map, and identification of where the commission should expand a high fire-threat district based on new information or changes to the environment.

Complete
(L) Enterprise-wide Risk
Identification
A methodology for identifying and presenting enterprise-wide safety risk and wildfire-related risk.

Complete –
recommendations
(M) Service Restoration A statement of how the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative will restore service after a wildfire. Complete (N) Monitoring,
Correcting, and
Updating the WMP
A description of the processes and procedures the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative shall use to do all of the following:
(i) Monitor and audit the implementation of the wildfire mitigation plan.

Complete

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page 4
Element Definition Finding
(ii) Identify any deficiencies in the wildfire mitigation plan or its implementation, and correct those deficiencies.
(iii) Monitor and audit the effectiveness of electrical line and equipment inspections, including inspections performed
by contractors, that are carried out under the plan, other applicable statutes, or commission rules.

3.2. Review of WMP Elements
CRA determined that REU’s WMP meets the statutory requirements for comprehensiveness per PUC §8387. The sections below summarize CRA’s assessment of each of these requirements, including relevant WMP references and recommendations, where applicable.

Staff Responsibilities
Finding: Complete.

Roles and Responsibilities associated with implementation of the WMP are described in Section 5 of the Plan. Additional roles and responsibilities related to specific processes are documented throughout the Plan.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

Plan Objectives
Finding: Complete.

Plan objectives are described in Section 3 of the Plan. Prior-year recommendations suggested incorporating risk evaluation more explicitly within this section. While this remains a consideration, it is addressed through recommendations related to enterprise-wide risk identification.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

Wildfire Risk Reduction Strategy Description
Finding: Complete.

Wildfire risk reduction strategies are described in Section 7 of the Plan. Mitigation measures include vegetation management (VM), grid hardening, design and construction standards, asset inspections, and undergrounding.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

Evaluation Metrics
Finding: Complete.

Plan evaluation metrics are described in Section 9 of the Plan. REU currently uses tracks two outcome-based metrics: fire ignitions and wire down events. To date, REU reports no wildfire events requiring application of these metrics.

Recommendations:

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page 5
In addition to outcome-based metrics, CRA recommends incorporating additional metrics that track changes in underlying risk and program performance over time. Examples of potential metrics include:
• Number of Red Flag Warning Days
• Hazard tree counts and corrections performed
• Percent of targeted overhead inspections completed / percent of overhead system inspected annually
• Number of GO 95 Level 1 and Level 2 conditions identified • Number or percentage of corrective actions completed on time in adherence with GO 95 Rule 18
• Vegetation management miles inspected or percentage of system inspected • QA / QC numbers for VM or inspections
• Number and type of community outreach activities
Metrics such as fire ignitions or wire down events are widely used and appropriate for outcome tracking; however, they provide limited into trends or the performance of specific mitigation activities. Supplemental metrics, such as Red Flag Warning Days, can help contextualize program performance relative to changing risk conditions.

Application of Metrics to Evaluate Plan
Finding: Complete.

Section 9 of the Plan describes the application of evaluation metrics, with tracking beginning in 2020. REU notes that no tracked events have occurred and indicates that metric effectiveness will be reassessed if a fire occurs.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations for the current metrics. Refer to the evaluation metrics recommendations for suggested enhancements and opportunities for greater program effectiveness insight.

Recloser and Deenergization Protocols
Finding: Complete.

Recloser and deenergization policies are described in Section 7 of the Plan. REU reports its system does not include distribution-level recloser equipment; therefore, a recloser policy is not needed. REU reports that it has not had to preemptively deenergize any lines to date and provides a description of any deenergization would be approached and the city-wide effort to respond to and address such a situation.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

Deenergization Customer Notification Procedure
Finding: Complete.

Customer notification procedures related to deenergization are described in Section 7 of the Plan.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

Vegetation Management

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page 6
Finding: Complete.

Vegetation Management practices are described in Section 7 of the Plan. REU documents compliance with Public Resources Codes 4292 and 4293, as well as GO 95 Rule 35 and Appendix E Guidelines. While certain guidelines are recommended for utilities operating in CPUC Tiers 2 and Tier 3 High Fire Threat Districts, REU applies these practices voluntarily, demonstrating above and beyond practices for VM.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

Asset Inspections
Finding: Complete.

Asset inspections practices are described in Section 7 of the Plan and demonstrate alignment with CPUC GO 165 and GO 95 Rule 18. As with VM practices, these standards exceed minimum requirements for REU’s current risk profile.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

Wildfire Risks and Drivers
Finding: Complete (all sub-sections included).

Wildfire risks and drivers are described in Section 6 of the Plan. All relevant drivers are identified, and prioritization of these drivers is described in detail.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

Geographic Risk Identification
Finding: Complete.

Geographic risks are described in Section 6 of the Plan.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

Enterprise-wide Risk Identification
Finding: Complete.

Section 6 of the Plan describes enterprise-wide risks and outlines REU’s risk analysis process and method for prioritization.

Recommendations:

Statutory requirements call for a defined methodology for identifying enterprise-wide risks, which is covered in this section; however, CRA recommends consideration of a third-party risk assessment (e.g., annual or biennial) to provide independent review and additional perspective on wildfire risks and mitigation effectiveness. Such an assessment would add a layer of credibility to the overall assessment of the REU service territory.

Service Restoration
Finding: Complete.

Service restoration procedures are described in Section 8 of the Plan and further detailed in SOP 6.01, Electric Outage Restoration Procedures. Together, these documents demonstrate adherence to statutory requirements.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page 7
Monitoring, Correcting, and Updating the WMP
Finding: Complete (includes all subsections).

Processes for monitoring, correcting, and updating the WMP are described in Section 9 of the Plan. This section includes notification procedures for electric dispatch and confirms that the WMP is reviewed at least annually. The Plan also describes how inspections, reviews and program feedback are used to identify any deficiencies and implement updates as needed.

Recommendations:

No additional recommendations.

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page 8

4. Summary of WSAB Advisory Opinions and REU Applicability The Office of Energy Safety’s WSAB Advisory Opinions to Publicly Owned Electric Utilities and Electrical Cooperatives1 report issued in December of 2025 focuses on two primary areas: Risk Identification and Pre-Emptive Deenergization. Each of these is summarized below with a summary of applicability to REU.

4.1. Risk Identification
The WSAB reiterates that effective wildfire mitigation begins with utility-specific risk identification that considers both ignition likelihood and potential consequences. Utilities are expected to move beyond reliance on statewide fire-threat maps by incorporating local conditions, asset characteristics, and community context into both operational decision-making and long-term planning. Risk identification should be treated as an iterative process that matures over time as data quality, tools, and mitigation practices evolve.

REU’s risk identification process reflects this approach of going beyond the minimum requirements for the area, especially considering the city’s urban service territory, limited exposure to natural fuels, and absence of facilities within CPUC Tier 2 or Tier 3 HFTDs.

Further, REU’s use of supplemental risk information, including CAL FIRE FHSZ mapping, provides additional context appropriate to its service territory and supports proportionate, risk-based mitigation.

REU identifies wildfire risk drivers based on local conditions. The predominance of flat terrain, extensive underground distribution, and limited areas of continuous flammable vegetation reduce both ignition likelihood and potential wildfire consequences.

REU’s risk identification informs both near-term operational awareness and longer-term planning. This approach supports targeted mitigation measures, as described in the WMP and evidenced by increased measures in their designated “Wildfire Reduction Zone” and in the recently identified FHSZ.

4.2. Preemptive De-energization
The WSAB re-visits the concept and varying needs related to preemptive de-energization approach, acknowledging that it is an important wildfire risk mitigation tool, but one that carries significant reliability and public safety implications. The focus section advises utilities to evaluate the need for preemptive de-energization based on their specific wildfire risk profile and to develop clear, well-documented plans that define decision criteria, roles, communications, and restoration processes. Having a plan demonstrates preparedness, even where preemptive de-energization is not expected to be routinely implemented.

Given REU’s low wildfire risk profile, preemptive de-energization is not a routine wildfire mitigation measure. To date, REU has not implemented preemptive de-energization actions and has not experienced conditions requiring their use.

While not a primary mitigation strategy, preemptive de-energization remains a contingency measure for REU. REU’s WMP includes defined roles, decision-making criteria, coordination protocols, and customer communication processes that would support preparedness should wildfire risk conditions change in the future. In the context of REU’s service territory, this 1 https://efiling.energysafety.ca.gov/eFiling/Getfile.aspx?fileid=59800&shareable=true

REU WMP Expert Witness Report
6/30/2026 Charles River Associates
Final Page 9
approach appropriately aligns recommended wildfire mitigation measures with the utility’s documented risk profile.

5. Conclusion
REU has prepared a comprehensive 2026 WMP that meets the statutory requirements outlined in PUC §8387(b)(2) to reduce the risk of wildfire ignition and impacts. The latest updates to the Plan reflect consideration of evolving wildfire risk conditions and document updates to protocols and awareness measures implemented in response to the changing risk landscape.

REU’s WMP describes a program that methodically identifies and evaluates key wildfire risks and risk drivers within its service territory. The Plan outlines preventive strategies that emphasize vegetation management, inspection and maintenance of overhead assets, and the undergrounding of new distribution lines, consistent with established industry practices for addressing these risk drivers.

Based on the wildfire prevention programs described in the WMP, supporting standard and emergency operating procedures, and REU's documented progress in implementing these programs, REU demonstrates a proactive approach to wildfire risk management. The utility is actively working to reduce the likelihood that its equipment contributes to ignition or spread of wildfires within its service territory as well as the impacts of wildfires that may affect their equipment and operations. REU’s mitigation strategies also reflect industry best practices, as demonstrated in the alignment with the WSAB’s 2025 Advisory Opinions focus areas.

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
1 Prepared by: J. Grace
Table of Contents

1. UTILITY INFORMATION ....................................................................................................................................4

2. PUC 8387 REQUIREMENT TABLE.......................................................................................................................5

3. PLAN OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................7 Plan Statement.................................................................................................................................................................7 Purpose of the Wildfire Mitigation Plan ..........................................................................................................................7 Plan Objectives.................................................................................................................................................................8 Minimizing Sources of Ignition.....................................................................................................................................8 Resiliency of the Electric Grid ......................................................................................................................................8 Minimizing Unnecessary or Ineffective Actions...........................................................................................................8

4. ELECTRIC SYSTEM BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................9 Balancing Authority of Northern California (BANC).........................................................................................................9 Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) ...........................................................................................................10 The Roseville Electric Utility Grid (REU).....................................................................................................................11

5. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES........................................................................................................................12 Governance Structure....................................................................................................................................................12 Wildfire Prevention........................................................................................................................................................13 Wildfire Response and Recovery ...................................................................................................................................14 Field Staffing Coverage during Business Hours..........................................................................................................14 Field Staffing Coverage After-Hours ..........................................................................................................................14 Standby Arrangements ..............................................................................................................................................14 Standardized Emergency Management System............................................................................................................15 Emergency Communications – Public Awareness During and Post Incident.............................................................18

6. WILDFIRE RISKS AND DRIVERS.......................................................................................................................21 Enterprise-Wide Safety Risks.........................................................................................................................................21 REU Electric System Risks...............................................................................................................................................22 Fire Risk Bowtie..........................................................................................................................................................22 Risk Prioritization .......................................................................................................................................................23 Other Risks.................................................................................................................................................................25 Topographic and Climatological Risk Factors.................................................................................................................26

7. WILDFIRE MITIGATION......................................................................................................................................27 Fire-Threat and Fire-Hazard Designations in Roseville..................................................................................................27

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
2 Prepared by: J. Grace
HFTD vs. FHSZ.................................................................................................................................................................28 City Wildfire Reduction Zone .........................................................................................................................................29 Grid Hardening...............................................................................................................................................................30 Design and Construction Standards...............................................................................................................................31 Vegetation Management...............................................................................................................................................31 Tree Pruning...............................................................................................................................................................32 Priority for Trimming..................................................................................................................................................33 Firebreaks and Weed Abatement..............................................................................................................................33 Responsible Parties....................................................................................................................................................34 Work Review..............................................................................................................................................................35 Record Keeping ..........................................................................................................................................................35 Property Owner Notification......................................................................................................................................35 Emergency Work........................................................................................................................................................35 Inspections.....................................................................................................................................................................35 Undergrounding Policy ..................................................................................................................................................36 Reclosing Policy..............................................................................................................................................................36 Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS)................................................................................................................................36 De-energization..............................................................................................................................................................37

8. RESTORATION OF SERVICE .............................................................................................................................38 Electric Outage Restoration Procedure .........................................................................................................................38 Outage Notification Procedure for Electric Dispatch.....................................................................................................38

9. PLAN EVALUATION .......................................................................................................................................39 Metrics for measuring plan performance......................................................................................................................39 Metric 1: Fire Ignitions...............................................................................................................................................39 Metric 2: Wire Down..................................................................................................................................................39 Metric 3: Completed WRZ Inspections......................................................................................................................39 Metric 4: Completed FHSZ Inspections......................................................................................................................39 Monitoring and Auditing the Plan..................................................................................................................................39 Identifying and Correcting Deficiencies to the Plan.......................................................................................................40 Monitoring the Effectiveness of Inspections.................................................................................................................40 Spot Checks for Inspection Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................40

10. Key Wildfire-Mitigation Targets .....................................................................................................................41 Key Wildfire-Mitigation Targets.................................................................................................................................41

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
3 Prepared by: J. Grace

11. INDEPENDENT AUDITOR ................................................................................................................................42

12. WMP PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS....................................................................................................................42

13. REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................................43

14. DOCUMENT REVISION ...................................................................................................................................43 Appendix A – Average Temperatures and Wind Speeds in Roseville .......................................................................44

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
4 Prepared by: J. Grace

1. UTILITY INFORMATION

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
5 Prepared by: J. Grace

2. PUC 8387 REQUIREMENT TABLE
PUC 8387 (b)(2) Requirement Location in WMP
(A) An accounting of the responsibilities of persons responsible for executing the plan.

Governance Structure
(Pg. 12)
(B) The objectives of the wildfire mitigation plan. Plan Objectives (Pg. 8)
(C) A description of the preventive strategies and programs to be adopted by the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative to minimize the risk of its electrical lines and equipment causing catastrophic wildfires, including consideration of dynamic climate change risks.

Wildfire Mitigation
(Pg. 27)
(D) A description of the metrics the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative plans to use to evaluate the wildfire mitigation plan’s performance and the assumptions that underlie the use of those metrics.

Key Wildfire-Mitigation
Targets
(Pg. 41)
(E) A discussion of how the application of previously identified metrics to previous wildfire mitigation plan performances has informed the wildfire mitigation plan.

Plan Evaluation
(Pg. 39)
(F) Protocols for disabling reclosers and deenergizing portions of the electrical distribution system that consider the associated impacts on public safety, as well as protocols related to mitigating the public safety impacts of those protocols, including impacts on critical first responders and on health and communication infrastructure.

Reclosing Policy
(Pg. 36)
(G) Appropriate and feasible procedures for notifying a customer who may be impacted by the deenergizing of electrical lines. The procedures shall direct notification to all public safety offices, critical first responders, health care facilities, and operators of
telecommunications infrastructure with premises within the footprint of potential de-energization for a given event.

De-energization
(Pg. 37)
(H) Plans for vegetation management. Vegetation Management (Pg. 31)
(I) Plans for inspections of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s electrical infrastructure.

Inspections
(Pg. 35)

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
6 Prepared by: J. Grace
(J)(i, ii) A list that identifies, describes, and prioritizes all wildfire risks, and drivers for those risks, throughout the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s service territory. The list shall include, but not be limited to, both of the following: (i) Risks and risk drivers associated with design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s equipment and facilities. (ii) Particular risks and risk drivers associated with topographic and climatological risk factors throughout the different parts of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s service territory.

Wildfire Risks and Drivers
(Pg. 21)
(K) Identification of any geographic area in the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s service territory that is a higher wildfire threat than is identified in a commission fire threat map and identification of where the commission should expand a high firethreat district based on new information or changes to the environment.

HFTD vs. FHSZ
(Pg. 28)
(L) A methodology for identifying and presenting enterprise wide safety risk and wildfire-related risk.

Enterprise-Wide Safety Risks
(Pg. 21)
(M) A statement of how the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative will restore service after a wildfire.

Restoration of Service
(Pg. 38)
(N)(i, ii, iii) A description of the processes and procedures the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative shall use to do all of the following: (i) Monitor and audit the implementation of the wildfire mitigation plan. (ii) Identify any deficiencies in the wildfire mitigation plan or its implementation and correct those deficiencies. (iii) Monitor and audit the effectiveness of electrical line and equipment inspections, including inspections performed by contractors, that are carried out under the plan, other applicable statues, or commission rules.

Plan Evaluation
(Pg. 39)

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
7 Prepared by: J. Grace

3. PLAN OVERVIEW
Plan Statement
The City of Roseville’s overarching goal is to provide safe, reliable, and economical electric service to its local community. In order to help meet this goal, Roseville Electric Utility (REU) constructs, maintains and operates its electrical lines and equipment in a manner that minimizes the risk of catastrophic wildfire posed by its electrical lines equipment. This Wildfire Mitigation Plan, or “Plan,” is enacted in order to ensure the safety of the public and City employees and maintain the reliability of the electric sub-transmission and distribution system.

The City applied careful consideration in the development of broad strategies to mitigate utility-posed wildfire risks while remaining consistent with the intention of Senate Bill 901 (SB 901) and other regulatory requirements. Based on the stated purpose of the Bill, and the location of REU's electrical infrastructure, no wildfire mitigation measures are necessary or required since REU’s service territory does not contain any areas that have a significant wildfire risk. As good utility practice, REU will maintain the metrics required in the plan and continue to update the plan if necessary. This plan will remain in effect until the next approved version is adopted.

Purpose of the Wildfire Mitigation Plan
This Plan outlines the comprehensive set of measures implemented by Roseville Electric Utility to address the risk of wildfires caused by power line infrastructure, encompassing a diverse array of policies and operational procedures. This Plan is subject to direct supervision by the City Council and is implemented by the Electric Department Director and his/her designees. This Plan complies with the requirements of the Public Utilities Code section 8387 for publicly owned electric utilities to prepare a wildfire mitigation plan by January 1, 2020.

The City of Roseville is in a region of the state with a very low wildfire risk. No part of the City’s electric service territory is located in or near the High Fire Threat District (HFTD) designated as Tier 3 “Extreme Risk” or Tier 2 “Elevated Risk” by the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) Fire-Threat Map. According to the updated 2025 Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps released by the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM), the City of Roseville includes areas classified as Moderate risk on the western side and Moderate to High risk on the eastern side.

Most of Roseville Electric Utility’s electric supply system is located underground. Historically, underground electric lines have not been associated with catastrophic wildfires. The undergrounding of electric lines serves as an effective mitigation measure to reduce the potential of wildfires ignited by power lines. Based on a review of local conditions and historical fires, Roseville Electric Utility has determined that its electrical lines and equipment do not pose a significant risk of catastrophic wildfire.

Despite this low risk, Roseville Electric Utility takes appropriate actions to help its region prevent and respond to the increasing risk of wildfires. In its role as a public agency, REU closely coordinates with other local safety and emergency officials to help protect against fires and respond to emergencies. In its role as a utility, REU follows all applicable design, construction, operation, and maintenance requirements that reduce safety risks associated with its system. This Wildfire Mitigation Plan describes the safety-related measures that REU follows to reduce its risk of causing wildfires.

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
8 Prepared by: J. Grace
Plan Objectives
Minimizing Sources of Ignition
The primary goal of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan is to outline Roseville Electric Utility’s (REU) existing programs, practices, and measures that effectively reduce the likelihood that REU’s electric supply system could become the origin or a contributing source of wildfire ignition. This objective is primarily achieved by maintaining adequate clearance between electrical wires and vegetation, thereby minimizing the risk of electrical faults and reducing the potential for wildfire hazards resulting from vegetation contact or downed conductors.

To support this effort, Roseville Electric Utility utilizes the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) statewide Fire-Threat Map, adopted on August 19, 2021, along with additional informational fire threat maps developed by other California state agencies. These resources are used to inform the development and continual improvement of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

As of the release date of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan, the latest available CPUC High Fire-Threat District (HFTD) maps indicate that all portions of REU's electric service territory remain outside of CPUC-designated High FireThreat Districts. No areas within REU's service territory are classified as Tier 2 – Elevated Risk or Tier 3 – Extreme Risk.

To ensure proactive risk management, REU will conduct an annual wildfire risk evaluation meeting each calendar year. This meeting will serve to assess any changes in local fire threat conditions, review applicable fire hazard maps, and identify potential adjustments to mitigation strategies.

Resiliency of the Electric Grid
The secondary goal of this Plan is to improve the electric grid's resiliency. As part of the development of this Plan, Roseville Electric Utility assesses new industry practices and technologies that will reduce the likelihood of service interruptions (frequency) and improve service restoration (duration).

Distinctive inspections of the electric sub-transmission and distribution power lines/equipment located within designated the City Wildfire Reduction Zone (WRZ) and Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) shall occur routinely in order to ensure that the probability is as low as practically possible that the Roseville Electric Utility electric supply system could be the origin or contributing source for the ignition of a wildfire. To support this goal, REU regularly evaluates prudent and cost-effective improvements to its physical assets, operations, and training that can help reduce the risk of equipment-related fires.

Minimizing Unnecessary or Ineffective Actions
The final goal of the Plan is to evaluate the effectiveness of specific mitigation strategies as they apply to Roseville Electric Utility. Where a particular action, program, or protocol is determined to be unnecessary or ineffective, REU will evaluate whether modification or replacement is suitable. This approach will also help determine if more cost-effective measures would produce the same or better results.

PUC § 8387(b)(2)(B)

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
9 Prepared by: J. Grace

4. ELECTRIC SYSTEM BACKGROUND
Balancing Authority of Northern California (BANC)
The Balancing Authority of Northern California is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) consisting of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), Modesto Irrigation District (MID), City of Roseville (RSC), Redding Electric Utility, City of Shasta Lake, and Trinity Public Utilities District (TPUD).

BANC assumed the Balancing Authority (BA) responsibilities on May 1, 2011 from SMUD that include the matching of generation to load and coordinating system operations with neighboring BA’s – Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Turlock Irrigation District (TID), and California Independent System Operator (CAISO). The figure below shows the geographical map of the BANC system.

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
10 Prepared by: J. Grace
BANC is the third largest BA in California and the 16th largest BA within the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) area. The Central Valley Project (CVP) generation, owned by the Bureau of Reclamation, and Western Area Power Administration's (WAPA) transmission facilities, along with the 500 kV California Oregon Transmission Project (COTP), are included among other resources within the BANC footprint. BANC Members contract for about 40% of the CVP hydroelectric resource. The COTP is jointly owned by several parties, including WAPA and BANC members, via the Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANC).

The creation of the BANC as a partnership between public and government entities provides for an alternative platform to other BAslike the CAISO. BANC provides reliable grid operation consistent with standards developed and enforced by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), and the WECC. BANC contracts with SMUD for operations of the BA.

BANC provides its members an ownership voice in all BA decisions consistent with the principle of maximizing consumer value. It also provides members a unified voice and representation in topics pertaining to Balancing Area matters. The structure provides flexibility to expand, offers potential cost-saving opportunities by sharing future facility costs, and clarifies roles and responsibilities of the members regarding reliability standard compliance.

Western Area Power Administration (WAPA)
The Western Area Power Administration, a power marketing administration within the Department of Energy, markets and transmits more than 30 billion kilowatt-hours of wholesale federal hydropower through an integrated 17,000- plus circuit mile transmission system across 15 central and western states. Power is sold to more than 680 preference power customers including cooperatives, federal and state agencies, municipalities, Native American tribes, public utility and irrigation districts and other energy service providers. In addition, WAPA provides for the purchase and exchange of electric resources, operations and maintenance services, transmission system interconnections, shared capacity and use of transmission facilities, and joint construction opportunities.

The Sierra Nevada Region (SNR) is one of five offices in the Western Area Power Administration. SNR markets power in northern and central California, and portions of Nevada, to wholesale customers and Federal end-use customers such as towns, rural electric cooperatives, public utility and irrigation districts, Federal, state, and military agencies, Native American tribes and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation customers.

Roseville Electric Utility is interconnected to the WAPA system on the BANC grid via two REU “receiving” substations.

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
11 Prepared by: J. Grace
The Roseville Electric Utility Grid (REU)
REU has been providing electrical power to the City of Roseville’s residents, businesses, and the City’s street lighting system since 1912. In 1956, the City signed a contract for 69MW of electric power from the CVP which consists of a system of dams, reservoirs and power plants within central and northern California and marketed by WAPA. Steady population growth created a need to obtain resources beyond this allocation of Federal power.

REU is under the supervision of the Roseville City Council. A five-member Roseville Public Utilities Commission (RPUC) serves as an advisory board to the City Council on matters relating to all utilities owned and operated by the City. The City Council appoints all five members of the RPUC. The Roseville Electric Utility Director manages REU and reports to the RPUC and an assistant City Manager.

Roseville’s electric grid is interconnected to WAPA’s Electric Transmission System through two 230kV receiving stations, Fiddyment Substation and Berry Street Substation.

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
12 Prepared by: J. Grace
Roseville maintains two permanent generation sites, Roseville Energy Park (REP) and Roseville Sunset Energy Center (RSEC).

5. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Governance Structure
The City of Roseville is a Council-Manager
form of government in which responsibilities
are vested in the City Council and the City
Manager. In this form of government, the
City Council’s role is that of a legislative
policy-making body which determines not
only the local laws that regulate community
life, but also determines public policy and
gives direction to the City Manager.

The City Manager administers the affairs of
the city government in a businesslike and
prudent manner. The public is invited to
attend City Council meetings, which are
typically held on the first and third
Wednesday of the month in the City Council
Chambers, 311 Vernon Street. Special
meetings and workshops are scheduled as
needed.

The Electric Utility Director has overall
functional management of the Electric Utility
and provides oversight of the Electric Utility.

The Director utilizes a Chief Operating Officer
and Assistant Electric Utility Directors for
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(A)

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
13 Prepared by: J. Grace
division oversight. The Electric Utility Director is responsible for executing the Plan.

The Electric Operations Manager oversees the daily electric utility operations, including construction, maintenance, energy control, vegetation management, and other ancillary duties. The Electric Operations Manager maintains functional management of assigned sections within the Electric Utility and reports to executive level management. The Electric Utility Director has designated the Electric Operations Manager with the authority to implement, execute and modify the Plan as necessary.

The Principal Engineer oversees the design/engineering tasks associated with distribution system modification and development/maintenance of material specifications. The Electric Engineering Manager maintains functional management over the electrical engineering-related tasks within the Electric Utility and reports directly to an Assistant Electric Utility Director.

The Electric Line Construction Supervisor/Operations Supervisor oversees the daily staff/crew work including establishing schedules and methods for assigned staff, implementing policies and procedures, and acting as a technical lead in support of the department’s Computer Maintenance Management System (CMMS).

Wildfire Prevention
Roseville Electric Utility facility design is performed by the engineering division using criteria that typically meets or exceeds relevant industry standards. Maintenance activities, inspections and vegetation management are performed by the operations division.

REU staff have the following responsibilities regarding fire prevention, response, and investigation:
 Conduct work and operate the electric supply system in a manner that will minimize potential fire risks
 Take all reasonable and practicable actions to prevent and suppress fires resulting from REU electric facilities
 Coordinate as needed with Federal, State, and local fire management personnel to ensure that appropriate preventative fire measures are in place
 Take corrective action when observing or having been notified that fire protection measures have not been properly installed or maintained
 Ensure compliance with relevant Federal, State, and industry-standard requirements  Maintain adequate fire prevention training programs for all relevant employees  Immediately report fires, pursuant to existing POU practices and the requirements of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan
 Take corrective action when the staff witnesses or is notified that fire protection measures have not been properly installed or maintained
 Comply with relevant Federal, State, and industry wildfire standard requirements, including the industry standards established by the CPUC

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
14 Prepared by: J. Grace
Wildfire Response and Recovery
Field Staffing Coverage during Business Hours
Roseville Electric Utility typically operates an electric dispatch center from 0600 to 1900, Monday through Friday and the following operational personnel from 0600 to 1530, Monday through Friday:
 Line Construction Crews
 Warehousing
 Inspections/USA Locates
 Troubleshooting
 Metering
 Substations
 Vegetation Management Contractor
Daily hours are subject to change based on various conditions such as weather, air quality and business needs.

Field Staffing Coverage After-Hours
An organized standby and call-out protocol has been implemented to ensure prompt response in accordance with the City's statutory obligations, enabling Roseville Electric Utility distribution operations personnel to efficiently address emergent situations within our service territory.

Roseville Electric Utility maintains coverage for after-hour emergencies per the Operations Standby Policy [1]:
 For conditions which must be responded to on short notice due to significant and immediate health and safety considerations, including, but not limited to, power outages, damage to electrical equipment or assets and Police/Fire emergency requests, or
 In order to respond to a civil emergency when a City Emergency Plan is implemented which results in the activation of the Emergency Operation Center (EOC) or the Department Operation Center (DOC).

Standby Arrangements
There are three categories of standby arrangements:
 Regular Standby for providing coverage outside of normal working hours.  Emergency Standby to ensure employees are available to respond to the City’s Emergency or Business Continuity plans in the event these plans are invoked.
 Ad Hoc Standby to provide coverage at specific times, for example; supporting a City event or additional coverage during Holiday’s, etc.

City of Roseville
Electric Utility Department
Wildfire Mitigation Plan - Effective 09-01-26
15 Prepared by: J. Grace
Standardized Emergency Management System
The City of Roseville has an Emergency Management Team (EMT) that typically meets monthly and has representatives from each City department as part of the team. The EMT works to ensure that the City is prepared to respond to disasters that may occur within the City. The City Manager acts as the Emergency Services Director. The Director works closely with city staff during a disaster; while the day-to-day operation of disaster preparedness and readiness lies with the Emergency Preparedness Manager, a Roseville Fire Department Battalion Chief.

As a local governmental agency, the City Office of Emergency Services has planning, communication, and coordination obligations pursuant to the California Office of Emergency Services’ (Cal OES) Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) Regulations, adopted in accordance with Government
Code section 8607. The SEMS Regulations specify roles,
responsibilities, and structures of communications at five different levels: field response, local government,
operational area, regional, and state. Pursuant to this structure, the City annually coordinates and
communicates with the relevant safety agencies as well
as other relevant local and state agencies and may
activate its’ EOC if necessary.

An EOC is the central command and control facility responsible for carrying out the principles of emergency preparedness and emergency management, or disaster management functions at a strategic level during an emergency, and ensuring the continuity of operation of the City. It is a 24-hour operation. When a disaster occurs, the Emergency Services Director meets with city staff to prioritize and develop strategies to handle the disaster incident. The EOC becomes the center of communication and coordination of resources. The Emergency Preparedness Manager coordinates all of the functions within the EOC.

An EOC is responsible for strategic direction and operational decisions and does not normally directly control field assets, instead leaving tactical decisions to lower commands. The common functions of EOC’s are to collect, gather and analyze data; make decisions that protect life and property, maintain continuity of the organization, and disseminate those decisions to all concerned agencies and individuals. When activated, the EOC can be comprised of representatives from every department within the City, including Law Enforcement, Fire and Rescue, Public Works, Parks and Recreation (Care & Shelter), Electric Utility and Environmental Utilities. These operations can also include representatives from outside agencies such as Placer County or Cal OES.

Public external communications are handled by Public Information Officers who report to the EOC structure and include the use of electronic billboards, radio, and social media (see “Emergency Communications” Section).