Sacramento City Council
October 21, 2025

Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Cost Burden per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$)
Item
Applicant
Sponsored
Future
Industrial
Highway
Commercial Notes
Assumptions
ICC Group
F-2 F-2
M
ICC Construction Type IIB IIB
IIB
Valuation per Building Square Foot $137.64 $137.64 $177.28 February 2024 Total Gross Acres 245.40 83.00 15.80 Applicant Sponsored Warehouse includes Public Uses.

Total Net Developable Acres 235.60 62.25 13.40
Total Building Sq. Ft. 4,688,440 949,064 80,940
Project Valuation
Acres per Project (Permit) 10.0 10.0 5.0
Project Building Square Feet 199,000 152,460 30,201
Project Valuation $27,390,360 $20,984,594 $5,354,121
2002 Building plus Equipment Valuations
Building Valuation per Bldg. Sq. Ft.- Type I or II Fire Resistant $49.40 $49.40 $49.40 Air Conditioning Valuation per Bldg. Sq. Ft. $4.20 $4.20 $4.20 Sprinklers Valuation per Bldg. Sq. Ft. $2.60 $2.60 $2.60 Total Valuation per Building Square Foot $56.20 $56.20 $56.20 Total Project Building and Equipment Valuation $11,183,800 $8,568,252 $1,697,324 Processing Fees
Administrative Processing Fee $1 $1 $5 $164 per hour, assumes 1 hour review Building Permit $689 $705 $1,088 $56,692 + $0.00462 *$ over $10 M;$20,761 + $0.005133 * $ over $3 M Technology Surcharge $55 $56 $87 8% of Building Permit
Plan Review Fee $600 $607 $889 $16,970 + $0. 0042 for each dollar over $3 Million Technology Surcharge $48 $49 $71 8% of Plan Review Fee
Planning Projects Fee $90 $91 $133 15% of Plan Review Fee Planning Inspection Fee $7 $9 $45 $1,344 flat rate; c harged when Planning Division performs inspections.

Seismic/Strong Motion $39 $39 $50 $0.00028*building valuation ($0.50 min) General Plan Recovery Fee $358 $358 $461 $2.60 per $1,000 of bldg. valuation Green Building/CBSC Fee $6 $6 $7 $1 per $25,000 of bldg. valuation or fraction, thereof Construction Excise Tax $450 $450 $450 0.008 * 2002 building valuation Fire Inspection Fee $110 $110 $110 $0.11 per bldg. sq. ft.

Fire Plan Review Fee $1 $1 $5 $145 per hour, assumes 1 hour review Subtotal Processing Fees $2,452 $2,480 $3,400
Warehouse
Fee per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Current as of January 2024
Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx 34 DRAFT

Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Cost Burden per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$)
Item
Applicant
Sponsored
Future
Industrial
Highway
Commercial Notes
Warehouse
City Development Impact Fees
Sacramento City Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) $1,310 $1,300 $1,140 $0.13 per sq. ft. for first 5,000 sq. ft.; $1.34 per sq. ft. for 5,001+ sq. ft.

Water Development Fee $387 $506 $2,552 Assumes 1 3" domestic meter ($55,163.58) and 1 2" irrigation meter ($21,914.87) Water Easement Tap Installation $29 $38 $190 Assumes 1 4" domestic meter ($3,158) and 1 2" irrigation meter ($2,573) Water Meter Installation $19 $25 $124 Assumes 1 3" domestic meter ($2,723) and 1 2" irrigation meter ($1,028) City Business Operations Tax $25 $33 $71 $0.0004 per $1 of bldg. valuation; Max. $5,000/year/contractor Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) $8 $10 $26 Payable at grading permit.

Neighborhood and Community Parks $170 $170 $400
Citywide Parks $50 $50 $160
Mixed Income Housing Ordinance/Housing Trust Fund $910 $910 $2,660 $0.91 per sq. ft.

Subtotal City Development Impact Fees $2,907 $3,041 $7,323 Other Agency Fees
Natomas Unified School District $780 $780 $780 $0.78 per area sq. ft. (effective 10/26/2023) Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $2,408 $4,024 $8,981 $46,009 per gross acre at grading permit; fee without land dedication Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $1,160 $1,160 $1,160 $1.16 per habitable ar ea sq. ft.(effective 7/01/2020).

Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $394 $394 $2,362 effective 7/1/2024 SacSewer Sewage Collection Impact Fees [1] $1,319 $1,721 $4,344 $26,241 per net acre (effective 7/1/24) SacSewer Sewage Treatment Impact Fees [2] $648 $648 $648 $6,479 per ESD; 5 ESDs per 50,0000 sq. ft. (effective 7/1/24) Subtotal Other Agency Fees $6,709 $8,727 $18,275
ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fees [3]
Roadways $5,208 $6,798 $17,160 $103,649 per net developable acre Sewer $223 $292 $736 $4,445 per net developable acre
Water $508 $663 $1,672 $10,102 per net developable acre Storm Drainage $1,026 $1,339 $3,381 $20,422 per net developable acre Administration $209 $273 $689 3% of all other ASI Deve lopment Impact Fees; $4,159 per net developable acre Subtotal $7,175 $9,365 $23,637
ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee [3] $622 $812 $2,049 $6,926 per net developable acre ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee [3] $109 $142 $359 $2,167 per net developable acre Total Fees per 1,000 Building Square Feet $19,973 $24,566 $55,044 Less Estimated Bond Proceeds per 1,000 Building Square Feet ($4,555) ($6,054) ($16,234) Total bond proceeds / total building square feet * 1,000.

Total Fees per 1,000 Building Square Feet Net of Bond Proceeds [4] $15,418 $18,512 $38,810 Source: City of Sacramento; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] F
ormerly known as SASD Fee.
[2] Form
erly known as Regional San Fee.
[3] T
hese fees will be charged per net developable acre. Fess shown per 1,000 bldg. sq. ft. for purposes of cost burden. Fee per net developable acre is equal for all land uses. Fees per 1,000 bldg. sq. ft. differ betw
een land uses because of different FARs. Highway Commercial FAR is relatively low, resulting in a higher fee per bldg. sq. ft. [4] T
he fees on this table exclude the ASI North Natomas DA fees that will apply to the ASI project. These fees are parallel to certain fees contained in the North Natomas Finance Plan, as updated.

Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx 35 DRAFT
Table 5-2
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Cost Burden Comparison with Metro Air Park (2024$)
Item
ASI [1] MAP Difference
Sourc
e Table C-3 Table C-4
Assumptions (acres and building square feet based on Metro Air Park Building 6) Total Net Developable Acres 18.17 18.17
Total Building Square Feet 240,000 240,000
FAR 0.30 0.30
Building Permit Processing Fees $2,436 $1,718 $718
City/County/Other Agency Development Impact Fees $11,284 $11,754 ($469) Plan Area Fees
Development Impact Fees $10,809 $4,569 $6,240
Less Frontage [2] ($3,697) -
($3,697)
Net Development Impact Fees without Frontage $7,112 $4,569 $2,543 ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee $937 -
$937
ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee $164 -
$164
Subtotal Plan Area Fees $8,213 $4,569 $3,644
Total Fees $21,934 $18,041 $3,893
Less CFD Bond Proceeds ($6,912) ($6,451) ($461)
Total Fees per 1,000 Building Square Feet Net of Bond Proceeds $15,022 $11,590 $3,432 Source: City of Sacramento; Sacramento County; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] T
he ASI fees exclude the ASI North Natomas DA fees that will apply to the ASI project. These fees are parallel to certai
n fees contained in the North Natomas Finance Plan, as updated. [2] Frontage porti
on of fee estimated below:

Total Cost: $43,144,715
Frontage Cost: $14,756,442
Frontage Pct. of ASI Fee: 34%
Estimated Frontage Fee: $3,697
Fee per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx 36 Airport South Industrial Finance Plan
June 2025
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 37
As shown in Table 5-2, the building permit processing fees; existing City, County, and regional fees; and estimated CFD bond proceeds in total differ very little for the two areas. However, the ASI Plan Area Fees are higher than the MAP Plan Area Fees.

One reason for this difference is because the ASI Plan Area Fees include the Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee to fund entitlement costs and the Public Land Acquisition DA Fee to fund land costs for land dedicated to the City, while MAP does not have comparable fees. In addition, the ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fee Program includes road frontage costs, whereas MAP did not include these costs in their plan area fees. MAP likely incurred similar road frontage costs but privately funded them (as is often the case) rather than include them in a public fee program. Inclusion of the frontage costs in the ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fee Program is explained below.

Road Frontage Costs
The cost of all improvements (including road frontage costs) in the ASI Roadway Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) are contained in the ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fee Program because all roadways equally benefit all Project ownership interests. The proposed roadways in the CIP are all required for the Project to develop as a whole. No particular roadway can be broken out as benefitting only a specific ownership interest. Further, because all roadways must include the required frontage improvements, these improvements should be included in the ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fee Program, which applies to all ownership interests. Additionally, project frontage does not give any owner any additional benefits, as the ASI development is planned to be mostly industrial buildings that simply need connected internal circulation and external access to I-5, Power Line Road, and El Centro Road.

Deducting the portion of the ASI Plan Area Fees associated with frontage costs results in a more equivalent comparison between ASI and MAP fees, although the ASI fee burden remains higher than the MAP fee burden. In total, after deducting the estimated portion of the ASI fees associated with frontage costs, the ASI fees are approximately 30 percent higher than the MAP fees for developments of the same type and size. As noted previously, a Project’s cost burden is only one measure of financial feasibility, and the higher cost burden for ASI does not necessarily indicate that the Project is not financially feasible.

Total Taxes and Assessments
The total estimated property taxes and assessments for developable land uses provides another measure of the financial feasibility of a project that is used by land developers, builders, and municipal governments to evaluate development projects. The level of taxes and assessments for each development type provides Airport South Industrial Finance Plan
June 2025
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 38
a general idea of the feasibility after adding proposed annual special taxes and assessments.

Table 5-3 shows the estimated taxes and assessments per 1,000 square feet of building space for the Project’s warehouse distribution and highway commercial uses. The total annual amount includes the following taxes and assessments:
• General property taxes.
• Other general ad valorem taxes (e.g., school General Obligation bonds). • Existing special taxes and assessments.
• Infrastructure CFD taxes (proposed in this Finance Plan). • Maintenance CFD taxes (proposed in this Finance Plan).

Taxes and Assessments Comparison with Metro Air Park
As another test of the financial feasibility of ASI (in addition to the cost burden comparison), the estimated taxes and assessments for warehouse development in ASI are compared to the estimated taxes and assessments for warehouse development in MAP. Table 5-4 summarizes the comparison. For the purpose of the comparison, ASI warehouse development is compared to a recently constructed 240,000 square foot building in MAP, and it is assumed that the ASI development would have the same number of acres, building square feet, and assessed valuation as the MAP building. Note that these assumptions for the purposes of the comparison result in some different taxes and assessments than those in Table 5-3.

Appendix C provides the detailed comparison, including estimates of all individual taxes and assessments for each area. Note that MAP is located in unincorporated Sacramento County, whereas ASI will annex into the City, so a number of the taxes and assessments differ.

As shown in Table 5-4, there is no difference in the ad valorem taxes between the two areas, and there is very little difference in the existing City, County, and regional taxes and assessments. However, ASI has somewhat higher proposed services and facilities CFD maximum tax rates than MAP. In total, the ASI taxes and assessments are approximately 11.1 percent higher than the MAP taxes and assessments for developments of the same type and size.

As noted previously, a Project’s taxes and assessments are only one measure of financial feasibility, and the amounts for ASI do not necessarily indicate that the Project is not financially feasible.

DRAFT
Table 5-3
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Taxes and Assessments per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$) Taxes per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Item Percentage
Warehouse
Distribution
Highway
Commercial Notes
Assumptions
TRA 95-003
FAR 0.46 0.30 Warehouse: FAR for Applicant Sponsored development; Highway Commercial: EPS assumption.

Average Parcel Size (acres) 10.00 5.00
Average Parcel Size (sq. ft.) 435,600 217,800
Assessed Value per 1,000 Building Square Foot (2024$) $150,000 $300,000 Ad Valorem Property Taxes
General Property Tax 1.0000% $1,500 $3,000
Natomas Unified GOB 0.1560% $234 $468
Los Rios College GOB 0.0192% $29 $58
Total Ad Valorem Taxes 1.1752% $1,763 $3,526
Estimated City/Regional Special Taxes/Assessments
SAFCA Consolidated Capital Assessment District #2 $72 $115 per 1,000 bldg. sq. ft. (avg.) SAFCA AD No.1 - O&M Assessment $3 $7 avg. per acre (wet zone); ind: $50; comm: $88 SAFCA Natomas Basin Local Assessment District $26 $40 per 1,000 bldg. sq. ft. (avg.) City of Sacramento Core Library Services Tax $1 $2 $22.91 per acre for first 5 acres; $5.73 for each additional acre City of Sacramento Additional Library Services Tax $2 $5 $58.84 per acre for first 5 acres; $14.72 for each additional acre City of Sacramento AD L & L $9 $9 $1,880.14 per parcel for parcels >100,000 sq. ft.

Reclamation District No. 1000 Stormwater Fee $3 $5 $0.30 per $100 valuation*$23,000 per acre Reclamation District No. 1000 Stormwater Service Fee $14 $22 $328.73 per impervious acre * 0.86 impervious factor Total Estimated Special Annual Taxes/Assessments $130 $204 Estimated Airport South Maintenance CFD $145 $221 $2,886 per net acre Estimated Airport South Infrastructure CFD $377 $574 $7,500 per net acre Total Annual Taxes and Assessments $2,415 $4,524
Source: City of Sacramento; Sacramento County; EPS.

Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx 39 DRAFT
Table 5-4
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Taxes and Assessments Comparison with Metro Air Park (2024$) Item
ASI MAP Difference
Source Table C-5 Table C-6
Assumptions ( based on Metro Air Park Building 6)
Total Net Developable Acres 18.17 18.17
Total Building Square Feet 240,000 240,000
FAR 0.30 0.30
Assessed Valuation per 1,000 Building Square Feet $134,152 $134,152 Ad Valorem Taxes
Percentage 1.1752% 1.1752%
Total $1,577 $1,577 $0
Estimated City/County/Regional Special Taxes/Assessments $97 $86 $10 Estimated Services CFD $219 $23 $196
Estimated Facilities CFD $568 $528 $40
Total $2,460 $2,214 $246
Percentage of Assessed Valuation 1.83% 1.65%
Fee per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx 40 Airport South Industrial Finance Plan
June 2025
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 41
Maintenance CFD
This chapter includes additional information regarding funding sources for annual ongoing maintenance costs needed to maintain backbone infrastructure and public facilities. Once backbone infrastructure and public facilities are completed, they will be dedicated to or acquired by public agencies. These public agencies will be responsible for maintaining the facilities. The Finance Plan provides estimates of the maintenance costs.

Development in the Project will be required to participate in a series of special financing districts to fund public services and the operation and maintenance of the public improvements. Participation in these districts will be determined by the City or the special districts no later than at the filing of final maps. The City or existing assessment districts will have funding responsibility for most items.

However, if a funding shortfall is deemed to exist, a Mello-Roos CFD, Community Services District, Lighting and Landscaping District, or some other funding mechanism will be established.

The Finance Plan includes an estimated Maintenance Mello-Roos CFD (Maintenance CFD) to be used in case of funding shortfalls from City funding sources. Table 6-1 details the total annual estimated City maintenance costs, which were estimated by Wood Rodgers. The annual cost estimate for roadway landscaping, drainage basin landscaping, and maintenance of signage, monumentation and miscellaneous features totals approximately $898,000. This amount equates to $2,886 per net developable acre per year.

DRAFT
Table 6-1
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan City Estimated Maintenance CFD Maximum Annual Special Tax Rate (2024$) Item Pct. Quantity
Unit
Cost
Total
Cost
Roadway Landscape sq. ft. per sq. ft.

ASI Drive Landscape Strips (2-each 6.5' LS Corridors) 113,750 $0.80 $91,000 Metro Air Parkway Landscape Strips (2-each 6.5' LS Corridors) 12,350 $0.80 $9,880 Connector Landscape Strips (ASI to South Bayou) (2-each 6.5' Corridor) 7,150 $0.80 $5,720 Subtotal 133,250 $106,600
Drainage Detention, Landscape and Access acres per acre Detention Basin Landscaping (NorthPoint) 66.9 $7,718 $516,039 Detention Basin Landscaping (Cayocca) 9.6 $7,718 $74,093 Detention Basin Landscaping (Campbell, Patel, Caltrans Excess, Isgur) 2.8 $7,718 $21,649 Subtotal 79.3 $611,781
lump sum
Project Signage, Monumentation and Misc. Features 1.0 $12,000 $12,000 Subtotal Annual Cost $730,381
Contingency and Repair / Replacement 20% $146,076
Administration 3% $21,911
Total Annual Cost $898,369
Net Acres 311.3
Annual Cost per Net Acre $2,886
Source: City of Sacramento Department of Utilities (based on annual costs reported for Basin 2 in North Natomas).

Estimated Annual Cost
Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx 42 Airport South Industrial Finance Plan
June 2025
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 43
Implementation
Implementation of the Finance Plan ensures that new development will construct facilities to meet the service-level specification set out in the Project and will pay its fair share of the cost of backbone infrastructure and public facilities required to serve the Project area. The City will implement the Finance Plan, which may include the following actions:
• Update relevant existing fee programs to include Project land uses and facilities when appropriate.
• Implement the ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fee Program, the ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee Program, and the ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee Program.
• Establish reimbursement policies and parameters. Reimbursements will be controlled by reimbursement agreements between the City and the developers. The time frame for reimbursements will be limited through the terms of the reimbursement agreement.
• Form a CFD to help finance the construction of infrastructure and public facilities and administer subsequent bond sales and tax collection. • Form a maintenance CFD for maintenance of streetscapes, utilities, signage, monumentation and other amenities, as necessary.
• Account for fee payments, fee credits, or reimbursements. • Update the ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fee Program, the ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee Program, and the ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee Program annually for inflation.
• Periodically, update and adjust the above ASI fee programs as new infrastructure cost, land use, and revenue information becomes available. • Coordinate closely with all appropriate City departments and other service providers to implement the Finance Plan.
• Work with property owners and the development community during the Project’s buildout to resolve specific infrastructure construction responsibility and financing issues that may arise as part of the individual land development application process.

After its approval, the Finance Plan will need to be updated periodically to account for changes in land uses, infrastructure improvements and costs, and funding sources. Changes in the Finance Plan should be re-evaluated within the context of the overall financing strategy to ensure required funding is available when Airport South Industrial Finance Plan
June 2025
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 44
needed. A Finance Plan update will require an amendment to the Development Agreement.

ASI Plan Area Fee Program s
Fee Amount
As documented in previous chapters, the ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fee Program, ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee Program, and ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee Program (collectively referred to hereafter as ASI Plan Area Fee Programs) fee estimates provided in this Finance Plan are based on the best facility improvement cost estimates, administrative cost estimates, and land use information available at this time. Each Plan Area Fee Program is proposed to have one fee per net developable acre that applies to all land uses and is established through the DA.

If costs change significantly, if the type or amount of new development changes, if other assumptions significantly change, or if other funding becomes available (as a result of legislative action on State and local government finance, for example), the ASI Plan Area Fee Programs should be updated accordingly.

After the fees presented in this report are established, the City will conduct annual and other periodic reviews of facility improvement costs and other assumptions used as the basis of this Finance Plan. Based on these reviews, the City may make necessary adjustments to the fee programs through subsequent fee program updates. The fee program update process is anticipated to be similar to the process for other City administered plan area fee programs and will be codified in the Project DA.

Administration Fee
Administration fees will be collected to fund the administration, oversight, implementation, and updates of the ASI Plan Area Fees, including administration of any credit and reimbursement agreements. The administration fee will provide adequate funding to cover all City costs. It is anticipated that these costs will include expenses for third-party consultants to prepare annual fee updates and annual benchmark cost estimates for incomplete fee-funded backbone infrastructure and public facilities.

While the administration fee is required to cover actual costs of administering the program on an annual basis, this fee component also must provide adequate funding to cover periodic updates to the program that are above and beyond annual fee program administration. For the ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee Program, a three percent fee program administration component is included in the estimated land acquisition cost and resulting fee per acre. For the other two ASI Airport South Industrial Finance Plan
June 2025
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 45
Plan Area Fee Programs, it is recommended that a separate administration fee component be established as three percent of the base fee per acre.

Reimbursements and Fee Credits
The City and individual developers may agree to have developers build or advance-fund certain items identified in the ASI Plan Area Fee Programs. The items advance-funded or built may be part of the fee program or funded by non- fee revenues. In the case of such an agreement, developers should receive a reimbursement or fee credit based on the terms of the agreement. Infrastructure projects that are the financial responsibility of the developer (i.e., designated as private capital) are not subject to reimbursement or fee credits.

For instance, if a developer constructs and funds the extension of a roadway contained in the ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fee Program, then the developer would be eligible for a reimbursement or fee credit up to the amount of funding that was to be included in the fee program. In such an instance, the City and the developer would come to agreement before construction of the improvement to determine the amount, timing, and manner of repayment of the advance funding:
fee credit or reimbursement. The City will establish a set of procedures to manage reimbursement/credit agreements. The procedures could include forms of any agreement and accounting procedures to manage the reimbursement/credit program.

Fee Program Updates
Periodic Adjustments
The ASI Plan Area Fees presented in this report are based on the best available cost estimates and land use information at this time. If costs or land uses change significantly in either direction, or if other funding becomes available, the fees will be updated accordingly.

Annual Adjustments
Annual adjustments to costs and fees will be made using different methodologies for the three different fees.

ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fee
Annual ASI Backbone Infrastructure Fee adjustments shall occur on July 1 of each calendar year. The fees shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the average of the Engineering-News Record’s San Francisco and 20-Cities Construction Cost Indices (CCIs) for the 12-month period ending in March of the current year unless this percentage change is negative, in which case the fees will be kept at the same level. For example, the adjustment for the 2026 fees would Airport South Industrial Finance Plan
June 2025
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 46
be determined by calculating the percentage change in the average of the San Francisco and 20-Cities CCIs from March 2025 to March 2026.

ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee
Annual ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee adjustments shall occur on July 1 of each calendar year. The public land acquisition cost and fees shall be adjusted based on an annual public land appraisal.

ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement Fee
Annual ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee adjustments shall occur on July 1 of each calendar year. The fee adjustments are subject to the terms of the DA.

APPENDICES:

Appendix A: Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Appendix B: Airport South Industrial
Estimated Fee Revenue from
Existing and Proposed Fee
Programs
Appendix C: Airport South Industrial and
Metro Air Park Financial
Feasibility Comparison

APPENDIX A:

Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program

D
raft
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
V
ersion 3.4
City of Sacramento, California
P
repared For:

NorthPoint Development
June 28, 2024 (Ver 3.2)
Revised Jan 19, 2025 (Ver 3.3)
Revised June 30, 2025 (Ver 3.4)
Prepared By:

Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025
Table of Contents

1. Int
roduction

2. O
verall Summary
A. Table 1 Project CIP Overall Summary
B. Project CIP Detailed Summaries
1) Table 2 Roadway
2) Table 3 Sewer
3) Table 4 Water
4) Table 5 Drainage
Note: Overall and Detailed Summaries include Proposed ASI Fee Facilities and Costs.

3. C
IP Exhibits
A. Roadway CIP Exhibit
B. On-Site Sewer CIP Exhibit
C. Off-site Sewer CIP Exhibit
D. Water CIP Exhibit
E. Drainage CIP Exhibit

4. R
oadway CIP Estimate Detail
A. Roadway Detailed Summary
B. Roadway Base Unit Prices
C. Roadway Detailed Estimate Sheets

5. S
ewer CIP Estimate Detail
A. Sewer Detailed Summary
B. Sewer Base Unit Prices
C. Sewer Estimate Sheets

6. W
ater CIP Estimate Detail
A. Water Detailed Summary
B. Water Base Unit Prices
C. Water Estimate Sheets

7. D
rainage CIP Estimate Detail
A. Water Detailed Summary
B. Drainage Base Unit Prices
C. Drainage Estimate Sheets
Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025

1. Introduction
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
NorthPoint Development

ii
.com

1. Introduction

This capital Improvement Program (CIP) has been prepared for the Airport South Industrial Project (ASI). ASI is located in an area in unincorporated Sacramento County (County). The project site encompasses approximately 437 undeveloped acres (excluding approximately 38 acres of Caltrans 1-5 Fee Title Right of Way) that are currently used for agricultural purposes. The Project location is directly south of Metro Air Park (MAP) and Interstate 5 (I-5), southwest of the Northlake development in the City of Sacramento (City), and west of the North Natomas Community Plan in the City.

This CIP provides estimates of Backbone Infrastructure Facilities necessary to serve the project. This CIP is intended to provide cost information for presentation in the ASI Finance Plan and includes the following:

1. Infrastructure cost estimates for roadway, sewer, water and drainage facilities.

2. The identification of the City of Sacramento, County of Sacramento, SacSewer and other Agency / Stakeholder credits & reimbursements applicable to the Infrastructure. This includes the identification of potential fair share costs for transportation / circulation improvements.

3. Provide the infrastructure facilities and their estimated costs proposed for inclusion in a plan-area fee (The ASI Fee). This fee will be administered by the City of Sacramento across the ASI plan area to the project landowner and developers.

The CIP estimates are based on the following studies. These studies will be updated in the future with project development. This CIP will also be revised at various milestones to address updates to the studies listed as follows:

1. Roadway
Draft Airport South Industrial: Project Traffic Improvements Phasing and fair Share Analysis Memo Prepared By: DKS Associates
Date: June 19, 2024

Note: This Memo is based on previous traffic analysis including traffic trip generation, distribution, and modeling efforts. Draft fair share information has been generated based on Caltrans standard calculations. Approximate Phasing has been identified that is based on geographic areas of the project being developed in roughly 3-phases. It is the intent of the Project Team to revisit this information at the time of development to ensure that the proposed improvements and any triggered off-site work is based on current development scenario(s) and updated, corrected traffic modeling and fair share calculation information.

The City Public Works Department has been responsible for coordination with the County of Sacramento with respect to potential shared transportation improvements. Impacts to County roadways, and in particular, those associated with Metro Air Park Interchange may be further discussed with the City and County in order to provide a more comprehensive shared solution to Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
NorthPoint Development
iii
the future interchange expansion to its ultimate configuration. It is anticipated that these discussions will occur over the first and second quarters of 2025 during the processing of the proposed annexation and entitlements for the Project. Any modifications will be reflected in updated ASI CIP documentation.

2. S
ewer
Airport South Industrial L evel 1 Sewer Study
Prepared By: Wood Rodgers Inc.

Date: November 14, 2022

3. Wa
ter
Airport South Industrial P reliminary Water Study
Prepared By: Wood Rodgers Inc.

Date: May 11, 2023

4. D
rainage
Airport S outh Industrial Preliminary Drainage Study
Prepared By: Wood Rodgers Inc.

Date: October 11, 2023
E
nd of Introduction
Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025

2. Overall Summary
A. Tab
le 1 Project CIP Overall Summary
B. Project CIP Detailed Summaries
1) Table 2 Roadway
2) Table 3 Sewer
3) Table 4 Water
4) Table 5 Drainage
Printed 6/29/2025
Table 1
Airport South Industrial
Overall Summary of Improvements (CIP)
6/30/2025
Item Estimated Project Costs Summary Credit / Reimb. Estimated Credits / Reimbursement Detail ASI Fee Project Future Fair Share Total Total County of Sacto Sacto Area City of Sacto Left Open for Total Project Cost Future Construction Reimb (MAP) Net Cost Credit / Reimb MAP F-Plan Sewer District Water Additional Credit / Reimb. Fee Program Cost Cost (SacSewer) Credit / Reimb. (Check) Reimbursement Overall Summary
Backbone Roadway
On-Site Roadway (Incl Power Line) 29,094,984$ (292,086)$ 28,802,898$ (292,086)$ (292,086)$ ------- ------- ------- (292,086)$ 29,094,984$ (292,086)$ Off-Site Roadway 3,165,615$ (1,203,722)$ 1,961,893$ (1,203,722)$ (1,203,722)$ ------- ------- ------- (1,203,722)$ 3,165,615$ (1,203,722)$ Total Roadway 32,260,599$ (1,495,808)$ 30,764,791$ (1,495,808)$ (1,495,808)$ -$ -$ -$ (1,495,808)$ 32,260,599$ (1,495,808)$ Backbone Sewer
On-Site Sewer 7,689,398$ -$ 7,689,398$ 4,220,120$ ------- 4,220,120$ ------- ------- 4,220,120$ 468,902$ -$ Off-Site Sewer 9,146,250$ -$ 9,146,250$ 8,231,625$ ------- 8,231,625$ ------- ------- 8,231,625$ 914,625$ -$ Total Sewer 16,835,648$ -$ 16,835,648$ 12,451,745$ -$ 12,451,745$ -$ -$ 12,451,745$ 1,383,527$ -$ Backbone Water
On-Site Water 5,701,189$ -$ 5,701,189$ TBD ------- ------- TBD ------- -$ 3,144,289$ -$ Off-Site Water -$ -$ -$ -$ ------- ------- ------- ------- -$ -$ -$ Total Water 5,701,189$ -$ 5,701,189$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,144,289$ -$ Backbone Drainage
On-Site Drainage 31,113,504$ -$ 31,113,504$ ------- -$ ------- ------- ------- -$ 6,356,300$ -$ Off-Site Drainage -$ -$ -$ ------- -$ ------- ------- ------- -$ -$ Total Drainage 31,113,504$ -$ 31,113,504$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,356,300$ -$ Grand Total Imps. 85,910,940$ (1,495,808)$ 84,415,131$ 10,955,937$ (1,495,808)$ 12,451,745$ -$ -$ 10,955,937$ 43,144,715$ (1,495,808)$ Notes:

1. Final County of Sacramento Metro Air Park & Watt EV Reimbursements TBD.

2. Based on the MAP commitment to the MAP Interchange Improvements, cap MAP Reimb at the total Project cost less the ASI fair Share Cost.

3. Estimated Credits to ASI Fee expected to be provided by the County to the City of Sacramento at the scheduled timing of MAP Finance Plan implementation.

4. City Water Development Fee reimbursement / credit for Segment W1.1 (County to City T-Main conversion, metering station relocation and 12" Project connections to the T-Main) to be determined based on coordination with DOU and the City Managers Office.

5. W1.1 Estimated cost moved to the ASI Fee as a project-wide shared cost pending the determination of the County T-Main conversion coordination.

6. Offsite Improvements and / or Fair Share Cost for the MAP Interchange to be determined based on future analysis and coordination with the County of Sacramento. Current Costs and MAP Reimbursements are only place holders at this time.

J:\3000-s\3909_Airport_South_Ind\Airport_South_Ind_OA\Civil\Docs\Estimates\CIP\Ver 3 May 2024\Ver 3.4 June 2025\ 1-2024-Backbone- Summary of Imps-Ver 3.4
Overall Summary Page 1 of 3
Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 6/29/2025
Table 2
Airport South Industrial
Detailed Summary of Improvements (CIP)
Roadway Detailed Summary
6/30/2025
Project Costs Summary Proj. Reimb Est. Reimbursement Detail AS
I Fee
Project Roadway Facility Const or
Fair Share
Const.

Project Cost
Estimate
Fair Share % Fair Share
Project Cost
Total Project
Cost Total Reimb County of Sacto Metro Air Park Public Fac. Finance Plan Project Cost Future
Fee Program
Reimbursement
CIP No. Action Timing Est. Cost
Roadway Summary
Roadway On-site and Power Line Road
R1.1 Metro Air Parkway (Onsite Segment) Const. 2,162,423$ ------- ------- 2,162,423$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 2,162,423$ ------- R1.2 ASI Drive (E-W, Easterly 1/3) Const. 5,051,943$ ------- ------- 5,051,943$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 5,051,943$ ------- R1.3 ASI Drive (E-W Middle 1/3) Const. 4,566,179$ ------- ------- 4,566,179$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 4,566,179$ ------- R1.4 ASI Drive (E-W West 1/3) Const. 5,149,096$ ------- ------- 5,149,096$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 5,149,096$ ------- R1.5 ASI Drive (N-S) Const. 2,234,513$ ------- ------- 2,234,513$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 2,234,513$ ------- R1.6 NAPOTS Connector Rd-ASI Dr, to South Bayou Const. 926,046$ ------- ------- 926,046$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 926,046$ ------- R1.7 Power Line Road -South Bayou to Project S. Bndry Const. 191,700$ ------- ------- 191,700$ (191,700)$ PLR-3 Construct 97% MAP (191,700)$ 191,700$ (191,700)$ R1.8 Power Line Road I-5 OC South to South Bayou Rd. Const. 100,386$ ------- ------- 100,386$ (100,386)$ PLR-3 Construct 97% MAP (100,386)$ 100,386$ (100,386)$ R1.9 Abandon South Bayou Road (NorthPoint Lands) Const. 1,058,063$ ------- ------- 1,058,063$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 1,058,063$ ------- R1.10 South Bayou Road (Campbell West PL to E. Project Bndry) Const. 1,478,385$ ------- ------- 1,478,385$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 1,478,385$ ------- R2.1 ASI Drive Round About Const. 2,430,000$ ------- ------- 2,430,000$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 2,430,000$ ------- R2.2 ASI Drive RD1000 L Drain Bridge / Culvert Const. 2,565,000$ ------- ------- 2,565,000$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 2,565,000$ ------- R2.3 Intersection MAP Pkwy & ASI Commercial Const. 776,250$ ------- ------- 776,250$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 776,250$ ------- R2.4 Intersection Imps MAP Parkway a ASI Drive Const. 168,750$ ------- ------- 168,750$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 168,750$ ------- R2.5 Intx. Power Line Rd. at ASI Dr. Const. 135,000$ ------- ------- 135,000$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 135,000$ ------- R2.6 Intx. Power Line at South Bayou (W. Boundary) Const. 101,250$ ------- ------- 101,250$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 101,250$ ------- Total On-site and Power Line Road 29,094,984$ -$ 29,094,984$ (292,086)$ ------- ------- ------- (292,086)$ 29,094,984$ (292,086)$ Roadway Off-site
R3.1
Intx. Imps MAP Interchange at NB On-Ramp (Intx 3) Const. 513,000$ 40.0% 205,200$ 205,200$ (307,800)$ I5-4 (Final Stage) Construct 87% MAP (307,800)$ 513,000$ (307,800)$ R3.2 Intersection Imps MAP Interchange at SB Ramp (Intx 4) Const. 675,000$ 66.0% 445,500$ 445,500$ (229,500)$ I5-4 (Final Stage) Construct 87% MAP (229,500)$ 675,000$ (229,500)$ R3.3 Imps MAP Interchange (Intx 4) Add SB Slip Ramp Const. 1,960,065$ 66.0% 1,293,643$ 1,293,643$ (666,422)$ I5-4 (Final Stage) Construct 87% MAP (666,422)$ 1,960,065$ (666,422)$ R3.4 Del Paso Rd. & El Centro Rd. Intx Imps (Intx 7) LS Payment 8,775$ N/A 8,775$ 8,775$ ------- ------- ------- ------- 8,775$ ------- R3.5 Del Paso Rd. & East Commerce Way. Intx Imps (Intx 11) LS Payment 8,775$ N/A 8,775$ 8,775$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 8,775$ ------- R3.6 Intx. Imps MA Pkwy at Elkhorn Blvd (Intx 12) (Completed) N/A -$ 34.0% -$ -$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -$ ------- Total Off-site 3,165,615$ 1,961,893$ 1,961,893$ (1,203,722)$ ------- ------- ------- (1,203,722)$ 3,165,615$ (1,203,722)$ Grand Total 32,260,599$ 1,961,893$ 31,056,877$ (1,495,808)$ ------- ------- ------- (1,495,808)$ 32,260,599$ (1,495,808)$ Notes:

1. Proposed MAP Power Line Road Imps from the I-5 Overcrossing south to Del Paso Road. Total MAP 2021 Cost = $2,962,052. Total Length = 4,800 LF. Length of ASI project frontage = 2,800 LF. Total MAP cost for ASI Frontage = $1,727,864

2. Based on the Power Line MAP commitment, cap MAP Reimb at total estimate for ASI.

3. Based on the MAP commitment to the MAP Interchange Improvements, cap MAP Fee Program Reimbursement at the total cost less the ASI fair Share Cost.

4. ASI Fair Share percentages based on the Draft ASI Project Traffic Improvements Phasing and Fair Share Analysis Memorandum dated June 19, 2024.

5. Estimated Credits to ASI Fee expected to be provided by the County to the City of Sacramento at the scheduled timing of MAP Finance Plan implementation.

6. Offsite Improvements and / or Fair Share Cost for the MAP Interchange to be determined based on future analysis and coordination with the County of Sacramento. R3.1, R3.2 & R3.3 are only place holders at this time.

J:\3000-s\3909_Airport_South_Ind\Airport_South_Ind_OA\Civil\Docs\Estimates\CIP\Ver 3 May 2024\Ver 3.4 June 2025\ 1-2024-Backbone- Summary of Imps-Ver 3.4
Roadway-Detailed Summary

Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 6/28/2024
Table 3. Sewer Detailed Summary
Airport South Industrial
Detailed Summary of Improvements (CIP)
Sewer Detailed Summary
05-30-24
Project Description Total Total SacSewer Est. Credits / Reimbursement Detail ASI Fee Project Est Reimb CIP No. Timing Est. Cost Project Cost Costs (Delta Credit)
Sewer Detailed Summary
Sewer Summary On-Site
Lift Station
S1.1 Sewer Pump Station 4,230,023$ 3,807,020$ N/A Fac-Acceptance 3,807,020$ 423,002$ Subtotal 4,230,023$ 3,807,020$ ------- ------- 3,807,020$ 423,002$ Gravity Sewer
S3.1 Trunk Gravity Sewer 459,000$ 413,100$ N/A Fac-Acceptance 413,100$ 45,900$ S4.1 Collector Gravity Sewer 879,188$ ------- ------- ------- ------- S4.2 Collector Gravity Sewer 690,188$ ------- ------- ------- ------- S4.3 Collector Gravity Sewer 781,313$ ------- ------- ------- ------- S4.4 Collector Gravity Sewer 329,063$ ------- ------- ------- ------- S4.5 Collector Gravity Sewer 320,625$ ------- ------- ------- ------- Subtotal 3,459,375$ 413,100$ ------- ------- 413,100$ 45,900$ Total On-Site Sewer 7,689,398$ 4,220,120$ ------- ------- 4,220,120$ 468,902$ Sewer Summary Off-Site
Sewer Force Main (Onsite & off-site to SRCSD Interceptor) S2.1 Sewer Force Main (Onsite & off-site to SRCSD Interceptor) 9,146,250$ 8,231,625$ N/A Fac-Acceptance 8,231,625$ 914,625$ Total for Off-Site Sewer 9,146,250$ 8,231,625$ ------- ------- 8,231,625$ 914,625$ Grand Total 16,835,648$ 12,451,745$ ------- ------- 12,451,745$ 1,383,527$ Notes:
1 SacSewer Credits / Reimb include 100% estimated construction costs (assumed at 20% Contingency). Sacsewer Engineering at 6.5% . Reduce Reimb. amount from 35% total Contingency to 25% <10%> to account for Developer cost.
\\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\3000-s\3909_Airport_South_Ind\Airport_South_Ind_OA\Civil\Docs\Estimates\CIP\Ver 3 May 2024\ 1-2024-Backbone- Summary of Imps-Ver 3.2
Sewer-Detailed Summary

Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 6/29/2025
Table 4
Airport South Industrial
Detailed Summary of Improvements (CIP)
Water Detailed Summary
6/30/2025
Project Description Total Total Estimated Credits / Reimbursements ASI Fee Project Est Reimb City of Sacramento Water Fee Project Cost Costs CIP No. Timing Est. Cost
Water Transmission and Distribution Mains
On-Site
W1.1 On-site Water Transmission Main 1,778,629$ TBD N/A Fac-Acceptance TBD 1,778,629$ W2.1 On-site Water Distribution Main 280,800$ ------- ------- ------- ------- 280,800$ W2.2 On-site Water Distribution Main 185,760$ ------- ------- ------- ------- 185,760$ W2.3 On-site Water Distribution Main 683,100$ ------- ------- ------- ------- 683,100$ W2.4 On-site Water Distribution Main 216,000$ ------- ------- ------- ------- 216,000$ W2.5 On-site Water Distribution Main 677,700$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- W2.6 On-site Water Distribution Main 496,800$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- W2.7 On-site Water Distribution Main 151,200$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- W2.8 On-site Water Distribution Main 1,231,200$ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Total On-Site 5,701,189$ -$ ------- ------- -$ 3,144,289$ Off-Site
Off-Site Subtotal -$ -$ ------- ------- -$ -$
Total for Water 5,701,189$ -$ ------- ------- -$ 3,144,289$ Notes:

2. W1.1 Estimated cost moved to the ASI Fee as a project-wide shared cost pending the determination of the County T-Main conversion coordination. 1 City Water Development Fee reimbursement / credit for Segment W1.1 (County to City T-Main Conversion, metering station relocation and 12" Project Connections to the T-Main) to be determined based on coordination with DOU and the City Managers Office.

J:\3000-s\3909_Airport_South_Ind\Airport_South_Ind_OA\Civil\Docs\Estimates\CIP\Ver 3 May 2024\Ver 3.4 June 2025\ 1-2024-Backbone- Summary of Imps-Ver 3.4
Water-Detailed Summary

Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 6/28/2024
Table 5
Airport South Industrial
Detailed Summary of Improvements (CIP)
Drainage Detailed Summary
05-30-24
Project Description Total Total Est. ASI Fee
Project Credit/Reimb. Project Cost
Costs
Trunk Drainage (36" Dia and Greater)
On-site Drainage
D1.1 Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northwest 1,482,759$ ------- ------- D1.2 Detention Basin -NorthPoint South 9,516,501$ ------- ------- D1.3 Detention Basin -NorthPoint North Central 1,442,006$ ------- ------- D1.4 Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northeast 905,314$ ------- ------- D1.5 Detention Basin -Ciocca TBD ------- -------
D1.6 Detention Basin -North 4 NAPOTS Parcels TBD ------- ------- D1.7 DB Gravity Connection Under RD 1000 L Drain 524,300$ ------- 524,300$ D1.8 ASI Drainage Pump Station 5,832,000$ ------- 5,832,000$ D3.1 On-Site Trunk Drainage -ASI Drive West 869,535$ ------- ------- D3.2 Trunk Drainage Metro Air Parkway / Comm 1,460,228$ ------- ------- D3.3 Trunk Drainage ASI Drive Central 1,180,136$ ------- ------- D3.4 Trunk Drainage ASI Drive East 1,304,370$ ------- ------- D4.1 NorthPoiint Lands Site Import Material for CLOMR / LOMR 6,596,357$ ------- ------- On-site Total 31,113,504$ -$ 6,356,300$ Off-site Drainage
Off-site Total -$ -$ -$ Grand Total 31,113,504$ -$ 6,356,300$ \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\3000-s\3909_Airport_South_Ind\Airport_South_Ind_OA\Civil\Docs\Estimates\CIP\Ver 3 May 2024\ 1-2024-Backbone- Summary of Imps-Ver 3.2
Drainage-Detailed Summary Page 5 of 5
Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 7/3/2025
Table 5
Airport South Industrial
Detailed Summary of Improvements (CIP)
Drainage Detailed Summary
05-30-24
Project Description Total Total Est. ASI Fee
Project Credit/Reimb. Project Cost
Costs
Trunk Drainage (36" Dia and Greater)
On-site Drainage
Detention Basin
D1.1 Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northwest 1,482,759$ ------- ------- D1.2 Detention Basin -NorthPoint South 9,516,501$ ------- ------- D1.3 Detention Basin -NorthPoint North Central 1,442,006$ ------- ------- D1.4 Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northeast 905,314$ ------- ------- D1.5 Detention Basin -Ciocca TBD ------- -------
D1.6 Detention Basin -North 4 NAPOTS Parcels TBD ------- ------- Subtotal Detention Basin 13,346,580$ -$ -$ DB Gravity Connector Under RD 1000 L Drain
D1.7 DB Gravity Connection Under RD 1000 L Drain 524,300$ ------- 524,300$ Subtotal DB Gravity Connector 524,300$ -$ 524,300$ Drainage Pump Station
D1.8 ASI Drainage Pump Station 5,832,000$ ------- 5,832,000$ Subtotal Pump Station 5,832,000$ -$ 5,832,000$ Trunk Drainage
D3.1 On-Site Trunk Drainage -ASI Drive West 869,535$ ------- ------- D3.2 Trunk Drainage Metro Air Parkway / Comm 1,460,228$ ------- ------- D3.3 Trunk Drainage ASI Drive Central 1,180,136$ ------- ------- D3.4 Trunk Drainage ASI Drive East 1,304,370$ ------- ------- Subtotal Trunk Drainage 4,814,269$ -$ -$ Site Import
D4.1 NorthPoint Lands Site Import Material for CLOMR / LOMR 6,596,357$ ------- ------- Subtotal Import 6,596,357$ -$ -$ On-site Total 31,113,504$ -$ 6,356,300$ Off-site Drainage
Off-site Total -$ -$ -$ Grand Total 31,113,504$ -$ 6,356,300$ J:\3000-s\3909_Airport_South_Ind\Airport_South_Ind_OA\Civil\Docs\Estimates\CIP\Ver 3 May 2024\Ver 3.4 June 2025\ 1-2024-Backbone- Summary of Imps-Ver 3.4
Drainage-Detailed Summary

Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025

3. CIP
Exhibits
A. Ro
adway CIP Exhibit
B. On-Site Sewer CIP Exhibit
C. Off-site Sewer CIP Exhibit
D. Water CIP Exhibit
E. Drainage CIP Exhibit

METRO
AIR
PARK

METRO AIR PARK

AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL SOUTH
Off-site Sewer CIP
Facilities
May 2024
I I
™1 � � �
� �
l!JNIN�0Rl!0RAiliED
IS1.1 I CIP Project Number
IS2.1 I Project Included in ASI Fee
Note: The ASI Fee includes only
the non-creditable SASD
(SacSewer) project costs.
■-■-■-■-■-■-■-•-·-·-·-· -·-·-·-·

NORTHLAKE

FORCE MAIN
ASI CIP PROJECT 2.1
Connect to 48"
SRCSD Interceptor
S2.1
�
• • • •
• • • • -
•• • • • •
■
D • • -

WOOD -RODGERS
J:\3000-s\3909_Airport_South_lnd\Airport_South_lnd_OA\GIS\ArcGISPro\SewerStudy\SewerStudy.aprx 2/16/2024 7:49 AM jfletter INTERSTATE 5INTERSTATE 5

METRO AIR PRKWY

DETENTIONBASIN

SOUTH BAYOU WAY
OLD S. BAYOU RW TBAFUTURE INDFUTURE INDISGURCAMPBELL

TO BE ABANDONED

POWER LINE ROAD
620'x1,940'1,202,800± SFBUILDING NO. 2620'x1,940'1,202,800± SFBUILDING NO. 4 620'x1,423'882,260± SFBUILDING NO. 1620'x1,123'696,260± SFBUILDING NO. 3620'x1,136'704,320± SFBUILDING NO. 5

PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT & PUE

TO BE ABANDONED

LOT DDETENTION BASINLOT CDETENTIONBASIN

LOT BDETENTIONBASIN

DETENTIONBASIN

LOT ADETENTIONBASIN
PARCEL 11PATEL FUT. IND
PARCEL 6CC-23.0 ± AC. (N)PARCEL 7CC-21.3 ± AC. (N)
PARCEL 1INDUSTRIAL47.7 ± AC. (N)
PARCEL 2INDUSTRIAL53.4 ± AC. (N)
PARCEL 3INDUSTRIAL34.4 ± AC. (N)
PARCEL 4INDUSTRIAL54.7 ± AC. (N)
PARCEL 5INDUSTRIAL45.4 ± AC. (N)
PARCEL 8FUTURE INDUSTRIAL64.3 ± AC. (N)
PARCEL 96.5 ± AC. (N)

0.7 ± AC. (N)

4.6 ± AC. (N)6.9 ± AC. (N)PARCEL 10

8.5 ± AC. (N)5.1 ± AC.(BASIN)

54.9 ± AC. (N)40.6 ± AC. (BASIN)

12.1 ± AC. (N)6.3 ± AC. (BASIN)10.5 ± AC. (N)3.5 ± AC. (BASIN)

SOUTH BAYOU WAY

SOUTH BAYOU WAY

2.3 ± AC. (N)LOT EBUFFER"A"DRIVE
DRIVE

INDUSTRIAL
SOUTH

AIRPORT

CALTRANSTO BE ABANDONED

37.9 ± AC. (N)CALTRANSROW
6,690± SF4,050± SF
LOT FSEWER PUMP STATION0.5 ± AC. (N)LOT GDRAINAGE PUMP STATION0.4 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 6AC-22.1 ± AC. (N)3,200± SFPARCEL 6BC-21.5 ± AC. (N)3,200± SF PARCEL 7BC-21.5 ± AC. (N)3,200± SF
PARCEL 7AC-24.0 ± AC. (N)60,600± SF COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO201-0291-026RIVER ROCKINVESTMENTS LLC201-1020-055 COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-021RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1000225-0010-034 COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-021
COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-017
COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-009
COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-010
COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-011COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-013NP MAP AND LANDHOLDINGS LLC225-0010-015NP MAP AND LANDHOLDINGS LLC225-0010-014NATOMAS BASINCONSERVANCY225-0020-013NATOMAS BASINCONSERVANCY225-0020-012 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1000225-0030-012
DHR CAPITAL LLC225-0030-060
CITY OF SACRAMENTO225-1480-053CITY OF SACRAMENTO225-1480-056CITY OF SACRAMENTO225-1480-020 STATE OF CALIFORNIA225-0030-050GRAND STAFF2010 TRUST225-1590-008MENGI 225-1590-009BRAH 225-1590-010MONTEMAYOR 225-1590-011BASSI225-1590-012MITROS225-1590-013HENDERSON225-1590-014THOMAS225-1590-015GARTNER225-1590-016WILLIAM J & RITA JBOWEN 2007REVOCABLE TRUST225-1590-017BUTTERMAN 225-1590-018MOIN225-1590-019DURETTE225-1590-020CHU225-1590-021HUANG225-1590-022MOMOH225-1590-023MAYO225-1590-024JOHN225-1590-025MCARDLE225-1590-026CLYDE225-1830-009FONG225-1830-010AHMADI225-1830-011FRIES225-1830-008 COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO201-1020-092COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO201-1020-090KOSAREFF201-1020-147 RIVER ROCKINVESTMENTS LLC201-1020-140RIVER ROCKINVESTMENTS LLC201-1020-139WILLIAM LINN201-1020-030LINN JUNE C1999 TRUST201-1020-056 GREENBRIAR PROJECTOWNER LLC201-0300-183GREENBRIAR PHASE 2 LLC201-1510-025 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1000225-0020-011

EXHIBIT E PROPOSED CITY/COUNTY WATER SYSTEMAIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIALCITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA THIS SITE PLAN IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSESONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL.

LEGENDEXISTING COUNTY T-MAIN (ZONE 50)PROPOSED 12" CITY DISTRIBUTION MAINWESTLAKE 8" WATER LINEPROPOSED JUNCTIONPROPOSED WESTLAKE CONNECTIONCOUNTY 30" WATER LINE (TO CITY) BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME3301 C St, Bldg. 100-BTel 916.341.7760Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816 2004000NORTH800 APPROXIMATE METERING STATION RELOCATIONPROPOSED 12" CONNECTION TO CITY SYSTEM 36"D60"D
36"D
Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025

4. Roadway CIP Estimate Detail
A. R
oadway Detailed Summary
B. Roadway Base Unit Prices
C. Roadway Detailed Estimate Sheets
Printed 6/30/2025Airport South Industrial
Summary of Improvements by Roadway facility and Segment Roadway Infrastructure
06/30/25
ASI Responsibilities MMRP / COA Action Reqd Timing
Project Roadway Facility Segment Description Qty. Unit Unit Price Total Fair Share Fair Share Adjusted Net Requirement Construct / Cost / lf Est. Const. Percentage Project Cost Project Cost Fair Share or Lump Sum Costs
Roadway On-site and Power Line Road
R1.1 Metro Air Parkway (Onsite Segment) On-Site At Grade Section from MAP SB Off-ramp to Airport South Industrial Dr.
97'' Street Section. 4-lanes. Full Frontage East and West 950 lf 2,276$ 2,162,423$ --- --- 2,162,423$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R1.2 ASI Drive (E-W, Easterly 1/3) On-Site East-West Section from East Bndry west to L Drain Bridge (Cayocca Frontage)
75'' Street Section. 2-lanes w/12' Median Full Frontage North and South
2,600 lf 1,943$ 5,051,943$ --- --- 5,051,943$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R1.3 ASI Drive (E-W Middle 1/3) On-Site L Drain Bridge east to Metro Air Parkway) 75'' Street Section. 2-lanes w/12' Median Full Frontage North and South
2,350 ls 1,943$ 4,566,179$ --- --- 4,566,179$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R1.4 ASI Drive (E-W West 1/3) On-Site Metro Air Parkway west to Pole Line Road 75'' Street Section. 2-lanes w/12' Median Full Frontage North and South
2,650 ls 1,943$ 5,149,096$ --- --- 5,149,096$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R1.5 ASI Drive (N-S) On-Site North-South Section from ASI (E-W) to Bayou Road
75'' Street Section. 2-lanes w/12' Median Full Frontage North and South
1,150 lf 1,943$ 2,234,513$ --- --- 2,234,513$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R1.6 NAPOTS Connector Rd-ASI Dr, to South Bayou Connector Rdwy to NAPOTS-ASI Drive to South Bayou
63' X-Section. Connect north to NAPOTS Parcels 550 lf 1,684$ 926,046$ --- --- 926,046$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R1.7 Power Line Road -South Bayou to Project S. Bndry West Side Project Frontage (South Bayou, South to Project Boundary)
Seal Coat Exist Pvmt, AC Dykes, Street Sights & Striping 2,000 lf 96$ 191,700$ --- --- 191,700$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R1.8 Power Line Road I-5 OC South to South Bayou Rd. West Side Project Frontage (South Bayou, North to I- 5 Overcrossing)
Seal Coat Exist Pvmt, AC Dykes, Street Lights & Striping 520 ls 193$ 100,386$ --- --- 100,386$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R1.9 Abandon South Bayou Road (NorthPoint Lands) West Boundary to E. Boundary (Through NorthPoint Lands)
Abandon Existing Roadway (Remove pavement and re-
grade)
4,750 lf 223$ 1,058,063$ --- --- 1,058,063$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R1.10 South Bayou Road (Campbell West PL to E. Project Bndry)
West Boundary of Parcel 3 to East Project
Boundary at El Centro
Retain Existing Roadway (add Cul-de-sac Campbel West
PL)
4,700 lf $ 315 $ 1,478,385 --- --- $ 1,478,385 TBD Construct Phased / TBD R2.1 ASI Drive Round About ASI Drive Round About Round-a-Bout with EB Truck Turn-a-Round Capacity 1 ls 2,430,000$ 2,430,000$ --- --- 2,430,000$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R2.2 ASI Drive RD1000 L Drain Bridge / Culvert ASI Bridge / Culvert Const Bridge (or Culvert) for Asi Drive across L Drain Incl Prop Sideslope Imps.
1 ls 2,565,000$ 2,565,000$ --- --- 2,565,000$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R2.3 Intersection MAP Pkwy & ASI Commercial Intersection and Signalization Imps. Full Intersection Widening & Signalization 1 ea 776,250$ 776,250$ --- --- 776,250$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R2.4 Intersection Imps MAP Parkway a ASI Drive Intersection Imp. 4-Way Stop Controled 1 ls 168,750$ 168,750$ --- --- 168,750$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R2.5 Intx. Power Line Rd. at ASI Dr. Intersection Imp. 3-Way Stop Controlled 1 ls 135,000$ 135,000$ --- --- 135,000$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R2.6 Intx. Power Line at South Bayou (W. Boundary) Intersection Improvements Abandon Through Lanes & 3-Way Stop-Controlled Intx. 1 ls 101,250$ 101,250$ --- --- 101,250$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD Total On-site and Power Line Road 29,094,984$ -$ 29,094,984$ Roadway Off-site
R3.1 Intx. Imps MAP Interchange at NB On-Ramp (Intx 3) Metro Air Parkway Interchange Imps. (Study Intx. 3) Extend MA Pkwy NB LT Lane to 200'; add LT at NB Off- ramp, 2nd Bridge Const. TBD
1 LS $ 513,000 $ 513,000 40.0% $ 205,200 $ 205,200 TBD Construct Phased / TBD R3.2 Intersection Imps MAP Interchange at SB Ramp (Intx 4) Metro Air Parkway Interchange Imps. (Study Intx. 4) Add MAP LT Lane at SB On Ramp; Add RT Off-ramp 1 LS $ 675,000 $ 675,000 66.0% $ 445,500 $ 445,500 TBD Construct Phased / TBD R3.3 Imps MAP Interchange (Intx 4) Add SB Slip Ramp Metro Air Parkway Interchange Imps. (Study Intx. 4) Add SB Slip On Ramp 1 LS 1,960,065$ 1,960,065$ 66.0% 1,293,643$ 1,293,643$ TBD Construct Phased / TBD R3.4 Del Paso Rd. & El Centro Rd. Intx Imps (Intx 7) Fund Re-timing for the Existing Signal City to perform retming 1 LS 8,775$ 8,775$

37.0% 3,247$
3,247$
TBD LS Payment Phased / TBD
R3.5 Del Paso Rd. & East Commerce Way. Intx Imps (Intx 11 Fund Re-timing for the Existing Signal City to perform retming 1 LS 8,775$ 8,775$ 10.0% 878$ 878$ TBD LS Payment Phased / TBD R3.6 Intx. Imps MA Pkwy at Elkhorn Blvd (Intx 12) (Completed Metro Air Parkway @ Elkhorn (Intersection No. 12) Provide 2nd WB Left Turn Lane (COMPLETED) 1 LS -$ -$ 34.0% -$ -$ N/A N/A N/A Total Off-Site 3,165,615$ 1,948,467$ 1,948,467$ --- --- --- Grand Total 32,260,599$ 1,948,467$ 31,043,451$ --- --- --- Notes:

1. Off-site Improvements and / or Fair Share Cost for the MAP Interchange to be determined based on future analysis and coordination with the County of Sacramento. R3.1, R3.2 & R3.3 are only place holders at this time. R3.1 "Restripe OC to add SB Lane is likely not feasible and will be revised in a future F-Plan Update.

2. Off-site roadway projects R3.1, R3.2 & R3.3 is currently assumed as construct obligations with a future MAP fair share reconcilation. These projects will be further examined in the future and potentially replaced by an overall MAP Interc hange fair share final stage calculation. 2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.4
Roadway Segment Summary Page 1 of 1
Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
Roadway Base Unit Prices
Item Unit Unit Cost
Typical Roadway Section
1 Clearing and Grubbing sf 0.10$
2 Pavement Removal sf 5.00$

3 Roadway Excavation cy 5.00$

4 6" Asphaltic Concrete sf 5.10$

5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) sf 4.20$

6 Lime Treat Subgrade sf 1.50$

7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) sf 5.60$

8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB lf 35.00$

9 Sidewalk sf 15.00$

10 Median Curb lf 29.00$

11 AC Curb lf 15.00$

12 Median Landscaping sf 15.00$

13 Frontage Landscaping sf 15.00$

14 Signage and Striping -Arterial lf 10.00$

15 Signage and Striping -Collector lf 8.00$

16 Lateral Storm Drainage lf 93.00$

17 Traffic Signal Interconnect lf 30.00$

18 Street Lighting lf 135.00$
19 Collector Sewer lf 105.00$
20 Water Main lf 90.00$

21 Joint Public Utilities lf 325.00$
22 Seal Coat Existing Rdwy sf 2.50$

23 Caltrans 8" AC sf 7.50$

24 Caltrans 1" AC (OGFC) sf 1.25$

25 Caltrans 15" AB Base (TI=10, R=30) sf 5.40$

26 Caltrans 16" AB Subbase (TI=10, R=30) sf 5.60$

35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 35%
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
Road-Base Unit Prices Page 2 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R1.1
Metro Air Parkway
Segment On-Site At Grade Section from MAP SB Off-ramp to Airport South Industrial Description 97'' Street Section. 4-lanes. Full Frontage East and West MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 97 sf 0.10$ 9.70$ 2 Pavement Removal 0 sf 5.00$ -$
3 Roadway Excavation 7.2 cy 5.00$ 36.00$ 4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 68 sf 5.10$ 346.80$ 5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 68 sf 4.20$ 285.60$ 6 Lime Treat Subgrade 0 sf 1.50$ -$
7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 0 sf 5.60$ -$ 8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 2 lf 35.00$ 70.00$ 9 Sidewalk 10 sf 15.00$ 150.00$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 0 lf 15.00$ -$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 13 sf 15.00$ 195.00$ 14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 1 lf 10.00$ 10.00$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 0 lf 8.00$ -$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 1 lf 93.00$ 93.00$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 lf 30.00$ 30.00$ 18 Street Lighting 1 lf 135.00$ 135.00$
19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 1 lf 325.00$ 325.00$ Total 1,686$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 590$
Grand Total 2,276$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R1.1 - Metro A Pkwy Page 3 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R1.2
ASI Drive (E-W, Easterly 1/3)
Segment On-Site East-West Section from East Bndry west to L Drain Bridge (Cayocca Fronta Description 75'' Street Section. 2-lanes w/12' Median Full Frontage North and South MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 75 sf 0.10$ 7.50$ 2 Pavement Removal 0 sf 5.00$ -$
3 Roadway Excavation 5.6 cy 5.00$ 28.00$ 4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 46 sf 5.10$ 234.60$ 5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 46 sf 4.20$ 193.20$ 6 Lime Treat Subgrade 0 lf 1.50$ -$
7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 0 sf 5.60$ -$ 8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 2 lf 35.00$ 70.00$ 9 Sidewalk 10 sf 15.00$ 150.00$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 0 lf 15.00$ -$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 13 sf 15.00$ 195.00$ 14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 0 lf 10.00$ -$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 1 lf 8.00$ 8.00$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 1 lf 93.00$ 93.00$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 0 lf 30.00$ -$ 18 Street Lighting 1 lf 135.00$ 135.00$
19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 1 lf 325.00$ 325.00$ Total 1,439$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 503.76$
Grand Total 1,943$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R1.2 - ASI Drive (E-W) Page 4 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R1.3
ASI Drive (E-W Middle 1/3)
Segment On-Site L Drain Bridge east to Metro Air Parkway) Description 75'' Street Section. 2-lanes w/12' Median Full Frontage North and South MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 75 sf 0.10$ 7.50$ 2 Pavement Removal 0 sf 5.00$ -$
3 Roadway Excavation 5.6 cy 5.00$ 28.00$ 4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 46 sf 5.10$ 234.60$ 5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 46 sf 4.20$ 193.20$ 6 Lime Treat Subgrade 0 lf 1.50$ -$
7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 0 sf 5.60$ -$ 8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 2 lf 35.00$ 70.00$ 9 Sidewalk 10 sf 15.00$ 150.00$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 0 lf 15.00$ -$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 13 sf 15.00$ 195.00$ 14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 0 lf 10.00$ -$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 1 lf 8.00$ 8.00$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 1 lf 93.00$ 93.00$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 0 lf 30.00$ -$ 18 Street Lighting 1 lf 135.00$ 135.00$
19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 1 lf 325.00$ 325.00$ Total 1,439.30$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 504$
Grand Total 1,943$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R1.3 - ASI Drive (E-W) Page 5 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R1.4
ASI Drive (E-W West 1/3)
Segment On-Site Metro Air Parkway west to Pole Line Road Description 75'' Street Section. 2-lanes w/12' Median Full Frontage North and South MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 75 sf 0.10$ 7.50$ 2 Pavement Removal 0 sf 5.00$ -$
3 Roadway Excavation 5.6 cy 5.00$ 28.00$ 4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 46 sf 5.10$ 234.60$ 5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 46 sf 4.20$ 193.20$ 6 Lime Treat Subgrade 0 lf 1.50$ -$
7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 0 sf 5.60$ -$ 8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 2 lf 35.00$ 70.00$ 9 Sidewalk 10 sf 15.00$ 150.00$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 0 lf 15.00$ -$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 13 sf 15.00$ 195.00$ 14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 0 lf 10.00$ -$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 1 lf 8.00$ 8.00$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 1 lf 93.00$ 93.00$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 0 lf 30.00$ -$ 18 Street Lighting 1 lf 135.00$ 135.00$
19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 1 lf 325.00$ 325.00$ Total 1,439.30$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 504$
Grand Total 1,943$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R1.4 - ASI Drive (E-W) Page 6 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R1.5
ASI Drive (N-S)
Segment On-Site North-South Section from ASI (E-W) to Bayou Road Description 75'' Street Section. 2-lanes w/12' Median Full Frontage North and South MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 75 sf 0.10$ 7.50$ 2 Pavement Removal 0 sf 5.00$ -$
3 Roadway Excavation 5.6 cy 5.00$ 28.00$ 4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 46 sf 5.10$ 234.60$ 5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 46 sf 4.20$ 193.20$ 6 Lime Treat Subgrade 0 lf 1.50$ -$
7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 0 sf 5.60$ -$ 8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 2 lf 35.00$ 70.00$ 9 Sidewalk 10 sf 15.00$ 150.00$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 0 lf 15.00$ -$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 13 sf 15.00$ 195.00$ 14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 0 lf 10.00$ -$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 1 lf 8.00$ 8.00$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 1 lf 93.00$ 93.00$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 0 lf 30.00$ -$ 18 Street Lighting 1 lf 135.00$ 135.00$
19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 1 lf 325.00$ 325.00$ Total 1,439.30$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 504$
Grand Total 1,943$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R1.5 ASI Dr. (N-S) Page 7 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R1.6
NAPOTS Connector Rd-ASI Dr, to South Bayou
Segment Connector Rdwy to NAPOTS-ASI Drive to South Bayou Description 63' X-Section. Connect north to NAPOTS Parcels MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 63 sf 0.10$ 6.30$ 2 Pavement Removal 0 sf 5.00$ -$
3 Roadway Excavation 4.7 cy 5.00$ 23.50$ 4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 0
5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 0
6 Lime Treat Subgrade 34 sf 1.50$ 51.00$ 7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 34 sf 5.60$ 190.40$ 8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 2 lf 35.00$ 70.00$ 9 Sidewalk 10 sf 15.00$ 150.00$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 0 lf 15.00$ -$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 13 sf 15.00$ 195.00$ 14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 0 lf 10.00$ -$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 1 lf 8.00$ 8.00$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 1 lf 93.00$ 93.00$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 0 lf 30.00$ -$ 18 Street Lighting 1 lf 135.00$ 135.00$
19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 1 lf 325.00$ 325.00$ Total 1,247$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 437$
Grand Total 1,684$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R1.6 Connector-ASI to S Bayo Page 8 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R1.7
Power Line Road -South Bayou to Project S. Bndry
Segment: West Side Project Frontage (South Bayou, South to Project Boundary) Description: Seal Coat Exist Pvmt, AC Dykes, Street Sights & Striping MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 30 sf 0.10$ 3.00$ 2 Pavement Removal 0 sf 5.00$ -$
3 Roadway Excavation 0 cy 5.00$ -$
4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 0 sf 5.10$ -$
5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 0 sf 4.20$ -$ 6 Lime Treat Subgrade 0 sf 1.50$ -$
7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 0 sf 5.60$
8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 0 lf 35.00$ -$ 9 Sidewalk 0 sf 15.00$ -$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 0 lf 15.00$ -$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 0 lf 10.00$ -$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 1 lf 8.00$ 8.00$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 0 lf 93.00$ -$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 0 lf 30.00$ -$ 18 Street Lighting 0 lf 135.00$ -$
19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 0 lf 325.00$ -$
22 Seal Coat Existing Rdwy 24 sf 2.50$ 60.00$ Total 71$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 25$
Grand Total 96$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R1.7 Power Line Rd SB to S Bndy Page 9 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R1.8
Power Line Road I-5 OC South to South Bayou Rd.

Segment: West Side Project Frontage (South Bayou, North to I-5 Overcrossing) Description: Seal Coat Exist Pvmt, AC Dykes, Street Lights & Striping MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 50 sf 0.10$ 5.00$ 2 Pavement Removal 0 sf 5.00$ -$
3 Roadway Excavation 0 cy 5.00$ -$
4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 0 sf 5.10$ -$
5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 0 sf 4.20$ -$ 6 Lime Treat Subgrade 0 sf 1.50$ -$
7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 0 sf 5.60$ -$ 8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 0 lf 35.00$ -$ 9 Sidewalk 0 sf 15.00$ -$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 2 lf 15.00$ 30.00$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 0 lf 10.00$ -$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 1 lf 8.00$ 8.00$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 0 lf 93.00$ -$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 0 lf 30.00$ -$ 18 Street Lighting 0 lf 135.00$ -$
19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 0 lf 325.00$ -$
22 Seal Coat Existing Rdwy 40 sf 2.50$ 100.00$ Total $143
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check $50
Grand Total $193
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R1.8 Powerline Road I-5 to SB Page 10 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R1.9
Abandon South Bayou Road (NorthPoint Lands)
Segment: West Boundary to E. Boundary (Through NorthPoint Lands) Description: Abandon Existing Roadway (Remove pavement and re-grade) MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 0 sf 0.10$ -$
2 Pavement Removal 33 sf 5.00$ 165.00$ 3 Roadway Excavation 0 cy 5.00$ -$
4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 0 sf 5.10$ -$
5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 0 sf 4.20$ -$ 6 Lime Treat Subgrade 0 lf 35.00$ -$
7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 0 sf 15.00$ -$ 8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 0 lf 35.00$ -$ 9 Sidewalk 0 sf 15.00$ -$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 0 lf 15.00$ -$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 0 lf 10.00$ -$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 0 lf 8.00$ -$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 0 lf 93.00$ -$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 0 lf 30.00$ -$ 18 Street Lighting 0 lf 135.00$ -$
19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 0 lf 325.00$ -$
Total 165$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 58$
Grand Total 223$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R1.9 Abandon S. Bayou Page 11 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R1.10
South Bayou Road (Campbell West PL to E. Project Bndry) Segment: West Boundary of Parcel 3 to East Project Boundary at El Centro Description: Retain Existing Roadway (add Cul-de-sac Campbel West PL) MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 0 sf 0.10$ -$
2 Pavement Removal 0 sf 5.00$ -$
3 Roadway Excavation 0 cy 5.00$ -$
4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 0 sf 5.10$ -$
5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 0 sf 4.20$ -$ 6 Lime Treat Subgrade 0 lf 1.50$ -$
7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 0 sf 5.60$ -$ 8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 0 lf 35.00$ -$ 9 Sidewalk 0 sf 15.00$ -$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 1 lf 15.00$ 15.00$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 0 lf 10.00$ -$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 1 lf 8.00$ 8.00$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 0 lf 93.00$ -$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 0 lf 30.00$ -$ 18 Street Lighting 1 lf 135.00$ 135.00$
19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 0 lf 325.00$ -$
22 Seal Coat Existing Rdwy 30 sf 2.50$ 75.00$ Total 233$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 82$
Grand Total 315$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R1.10 S. Bayou to Pjct Bndry Page 12 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R2.1
ASI Drive Round About
Segment ASI Drive at NE Project Bndry
Description Round-a-Bout with EB Truck Turn-a-Round Capacity MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Round-About Facility 1 ea 1,800,000$ 1,800,000$ Total 1,800,000$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 630,000$
Grand Total 2,430,000$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R2.1 ASI Round About Page 13 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R2.2
ASI Drive RD1000 L Drain Bridge
Segment ASI Bridge Const
Description Bridge to Span L Drain Incl Prop Sideslope Imps.

MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Channel Work ASI at RD 1000 L Drain 1 ls $100,000.00 $100,000 2 Bridge Const. (120' span x 50' wide) 6,000 sf $300.00 $1,800,000 Sub-Total $1,900,000
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check $665,000
Grand Total $2,565,000
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R2.2 ASI Dr. RD 1000 Bridge Page 14 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R2.3
Intersection MAP Pkwy & ASI Commercial
Segment Intersection and Signalization Imps.

Description Full Intersection Widening & Signalization
MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Intersection Signalization 1 LS $450,000.00 450,000$
2 Intersection Widening and Imps. 1 LS $125,000.00 125,000$ Total 575,000$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 201,250$
Grand Total 776,250$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R2.3 Intx.MAP Pkwy & Comm. Page 15 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R2.4
Intersection Imps MAP Parkway a ASI Drive
Segment Intersection Imp.

Description 4-Way Stop Controled
MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Traffic Stop 3-Way 1 LS $50,000.00 50,000$
2 Intersection Widening and Imps. 1 LS $75,000.00 75,000$ Total 125,000$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 43,750$
Grand Total 168,750$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R2.4 Intx. ASI Dr at MAP Pkwy Page 16 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R2.5
Intx. Power Line Rd. at ASI Dr.

Segment Intersection Imp.

Description 3-Way Stop Controlled
MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 3-way Stop improvements 1 LS $25,000.00 25,000$
2 Intersection Widening 1 LS $75,000.00 75,000$
Total 100,000$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 35,000$
Grand Total 135,000$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R2.5 Intx. Power Line & ASI Dr Page 17 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R2.6
Intx. Power Line at South Bayou (W. Boundary)
Segment Intersection Improvements
Description Abandon Through Lanes & 3-Way Stop-Controlled Intx.

MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 3-Way Stop 1 LS $25,000.00 25,000$
2 Intersection Widening 1 LS $50,000.00 50,000$
Total 75,000$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 26,250$
Grand Total 101,250$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R2.6 Intx. Pole Line & S. Bayou Page 18 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 7/1/2025
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R3.1
Intx. Imps MAP Interchange at NB On-Ramp (Intx 3)
Segment Metro Air Parkway Interchange Imps. (Study Intx. 3) Description Extend MA Pkwy NB LT Lane to 200'; add LT at NB Off-ramp, 2nd Bridge Const. TBD MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Restripe MAP Pkwy to Increase NB LT Turn Storage 1 LS 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 2 Intersection Imps (Add 2nd Off-ramp Lt Turn) 1 LS 330,000.00$ 330,000.00$ Total 380,000$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 133,000$
Grand Total 513,000$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.4
R3.1 MAP Interchange NB Intx 3 Page 2 of 2
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R3.2
Intersection Imps MAP Interchange at SB Ramp (Intx 4)
Segment Metro Air Parkway Interchange Imps. (Study Intx. 4) Description Add MAP LT Lane at SB On Ramp; Add RT Off-ramp Storage) MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Intx. Imps. (Add LT to SB Loop Entrance Ramp) 1 LS 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 2 Intx. Imps (Add SB Rt Turn Storage for SB Off-ram 1 LS 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ Total 500,000$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 175,000$
Grand Total 675,000$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R3.2 MAP Interchange SB Intx 4 Page 20 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R3.3
Imps MAP Interchange (Intx 4) Add SB Slip Ramp
Segment Metro Air Parkway Interchange Imps. (Study Intx. 4) Description Add SB Slip On Ramp
MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Construct
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and Grubbing 203,000 sf 0.10$ 20,300.00$ 2 Pavement Removal 0 sf 5.00$ -$
3 Roadway Excavation 7,600 cy 5.00$ 38,000.00$ 4 6" Asphaltic Concrete 0 sf 5.10$ -$
5 12" Aggregate Base (TI=9, R=30) 0 sf 4.20$ -$ 6 Lime Treat Subgrade 0 lf 1.50$ -$
7 16" Aggregate Base (TI=10, R=30) 0 sf 5.60$ -$ 8 Curb and Gutter w/ 12" AB 0 lf 35.00$ -$ 9 Sidewalk 0 sf 15.00$ -$
10 Median Curb 0 lf 29.00$ -$
11 AC Curb 940 lf 15.00$ 14,100.00$
12 Median Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
13 Frontage Landscaping 0 sf 15.00$ -$
14 Signage and Striping -Arterial 1,750 lf 10.00$ 17,500.00$ 15 Signage and Striping -Collector 0 lf 8.00$ -$ 16 Lateral Storm Drainage 0 lf 93.00$ -$ 17 Traffic Signal Interconnect 0 lf 30.00$ -$ 18 Street Lighting 1,750 lf 135.00$ 236,250.00$ 19 Collector Sewer 0 lf 105.00$ -$
20 Water Main 0 lf 90.00$ -$
21 Joint Public Utilities 0 lf 325.00$ -$
22 Seal Coat Existing Rdwy 0 sf 2.50$ -$ 23 Caltrans 8" AC 57,000 sf 7.50$ 427,500.00$ 24 Caltrans 1" AC (OGFC) 57,000 sf 1.25$ 71,250.00$ 25 Caltrans 15" AB Base (TI=10, R=30) 57,000 sf 5.40$ 307,800.00$ 26 Caltrans 16" AB Subbase (TI=10, R=30) 57,000 sf 5.60$ 319,200.00$ Total 1,451,900$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 508,165$
Grand Total 1,960,065$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R3.3 MAP Interchange SB Slip R. Page 21 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R3.4
Del Paso Rd. & El Centro Rd. Intx Imps (Intx 7)
Segment Fund Re-timing for the Existing Signal
Description City to perform retming
MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Fair Share
Timing Phased / TBD
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Intx Improvements 1 Job 6,500$
Total 6,500$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 2,275$
Grand Total 8,775$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R3.4 DP Rd & El Centro Intx 7 Page 22 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R3.5
Del Paso Rd. & East Commerce Way. Intx Imps (Intx 11)
Segment Fund Re-timing for the Existing Signal
Description City to perform retming
MMRP Item / COA TBD
Action Fair Share
Timing Phased / TBD
Completed with 2012 / 2013 Interchange Const.

Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Intx Improvements 1 Job 6,500$
Total 6,500$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check 2,275$
Grand Total 8,775$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R3.5-DP Rd & East Com Intx 11 Page 23 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 6/28/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
R3.6
Intx. Imps MA Pkwy at Elkhorn Blvd (Intx 12) (Completed) Segment Metro Air Parkway @ Elkhorn (Intersection No. 12) Description Provide 2nd WB Left Turn Lane (COMPLETED)
MMRP Item / COA N/A
Action N/A
Timing N/A
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Restripe MAP OC to Increase Lt Turn Storag 1 LS -$ -$ (Project will be completed July 2024)
Total -$
35% Contingency, Engineering and Plan Check -$
Grand Total -$
2024-CIP-Roadway Unit Costs Ver 3.2
R3.6 MAP PKWY at Elkhorn Intx Page 24 of 24
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025

5. S
ewer CIP Estimate Detail
A
. Sewer Detailed Summary
B. Sewer Base Unit Prices
C. Sewer Estimate Sheets
Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Summary of Improvements
Sanitary Sewer
Project Segment Description Total
Project Costs
Lift Station
S1.1 Sewer Pump Station 2.1 mgd On-Site Pump Station $4,230,023 Lift Station Subtotal $4,230,023
Sewer Force Main (Onsite & off-site to SRCSD Interceptor) S2.1 Sewer Force Main (Onsite & off-site to SRCSD Interceptor) 16" Trunk Sewer Force Main (Based on Alt. 1) $9,146,250 Sewer Force Main Subtotal $9,146,250
Gravity Sewer
S3.1 Trunk Gravity Sewer 18" On-site Gravity Sewer, ASI Drive, Central Section $459,000 S4.1 Collector Gravity Sewer 8"-12" Collector Gravity Sewer ASI Dr. (Eastern Section $879,188 S4.2 Collector Gravity Sewer 12" Collector Gravity Sewer ASI Dr. (Central Section) $690,188 S4.3 Collector Gravity Sewer 12" Collector Gravity Sewer ASI Dr. (West Section) $781,313 S4.4 Collector Gravity Sewer 8" Collector Gravity Sewer Metro Air Park Dr. $329,063 S4.5 Collector Gravity Sewer 8" Collector Gravity Sewer Cul-de-sac to NAPOTS $320,625 Gravity Sewer Sub-Total: $3,459,375
Total for Trunk Sewer $16,835,648
2024-CIP-Sewer Unit Costs Ver 3.1
Trunk Sewer-Segment-Costs Page 1 of 10
Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
Base Unit Prices
Item Notes Unit Cost Unit
SEWER
21" Trunk Pipeline 25'-26' Deep 375.00$ LF 18" Trunk Pipeline 22' Deep 300.00$ LF
15" Trunk Pipeline 28' Deep 250.00$ LF
12" Collector Pipeline 225.00$ LF
10" Collector Pipeline 195.00$ LF
8" Collector Pipeline 175.00$ LF
Sewer Lateral 175.00$ LF
48" Manhole 20,000.00$ EA
60" Manhole 25,000.00$ EA
Lift Station - 1.9 MGD See Estimate LS
(Note Sewer costs include $10 / lf for Dewatering)
Contingency & Engineering 35%
2024-CIP-Sewer Unit Costs Ver 3.1
Utility-Base Prices Page 2 of 10
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
S1.1
Sewer Pump Station

2.1 mgd On-Site Pump Station
No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
A. Pump Station General
1 Bonds/Ins/Contract Admin/Incidentals 1 LS $173,000.00 $173,000 2 Mobilization and Demobilization 1 LS $431,000.00 $431,000 3 Sheeting, Shoring, Bracing, and Dewatering 1 LS $173,000.00 $173,000 4 SWPPP Implementation and Maintenance 1 LS $12,000 $12,000 5 Pump Station Commissioning 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000
Pump Station General Subtotal $819,000
B. Pump Station Sitework and Underground
6 CMU Security Wall & Pilasters 143 LF $650.00 $92,950
7 Steel Drive Gates 2 EA $25,000.00 $50,000
8 Steel Man Gate 1 EA $8,000.00 $8,000
9 Miscellaneous Site Work/Finish Grading/Hydroseed 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000 10 Paving and Aggregate Base Surfacing 11,100 SF $12.00 $133,200 11 Removable Bollards 22 EA $2,000.00 $44,000
12 1.5" Water Service & Hose Bibb 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000 13 Shade Canopy 1 LS $75,000.00 $75,000
14 30" VCP Gravity Trunk 65 LF $880.00 $57,200
15 60-inch Manhole 1 EA $20,000.00 $20,000
16 Overhead Crane & Equipment 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 Pump Station Sitework and Underground Subtotal $655,350 C. Pump Station Civil & Mechanical
17 Earthwork – Excavation, Import, Backfill, Spoil 8,000 CY $30.00 $240,000 18 Wet Well & Hatches 1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000
19 280 HP Submersible Centrifugal Pumps and Access 3 EA $150,000.00 $450,000 20 Valve Vault and Hatch 1 LS $95,000.00 $95,000
21 Flow Meter Vault & Hatch 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000
22 Force Main Bypass Valve Vault and Hatch 1 LS $18,000.00 $18,000 23 Odor Control Pad and Piping 1 LS $16,000.00 $16,000
24 Discharge Piping, Fittings & Assembly 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000 25 Cathodic Protection 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
26 Miscellaneous (Washdown pad, odor control pad, & 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 Pump Station Civil & Mechanical Subtotal $1,249,000
D. Pump Station Electrical
27 Switchboard, MCC, RTU Cabinet, Programming 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 28 Electrical Distribution/Conduit and Conductors 1 LS $35,000.00 $40,000 29 Field Instruments (Level Transducer, High Level, Pr 1 LS $18,000.00 $20,000 30 Field Instruments (Flow Meter) 1 LS $18,000.00 $20,000 31 Balance of Electrical Materials, Equipment, & Labor 1 LS $25,000.00 $30,000 32 Site Lighting & Receptacles 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
33 Utility Transformer & Labor 1 LS $25,000.00 $30,000
34 Diesel Power Generator 1 LS $110,000.00 $110,000
Pump Station Electrical Subtotal $410,000
Sewer Pump Station Total $3,133,350
Contingency & Engineering 35% $1,096,673
Grand Total $4,230,023
2024-CIP-Sewer Unit Costs Ver 3.1
S1.1 - Sewer Pump Station Page 3 of 10
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
S2.1
Sewer Force Main (Onsite & off-site to SRCSD Interceptor) 16" Trunk Sewer Force Main (Based on Alt. 1)
No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Force Main (Based on Alternative 1)
1 16" HDPE Force Main (DR11) 16,500 LF $350.00 $5,775,000 2 30" Jack & Bore Casing 450 LF $2,000.00 $900,000
3 60" Airgap Manhole & Connections 1 EA $50,000.00 $50,000 4 72" Interceptor Manhole & Connections 1 EA $50,000.00 $50,000 Force Main (Based on Alternative 1) Subtotal $6,775,000 Contingency & Engineering 35% $2,371,250
Grand Total $9,146,250
2024-CIP-Sewer Unit Costs Ver 3.1
S2.1 - Sewer Force Main Page 4 of 10
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
S3.1
Trunk Gravity Sewer
18" On-site Gravity Sewer, ASI Drive, Central Section
No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Gravity Trunk Sewer
1 21" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $375.00 $0
2 18" Trunk Pipeline 800 LF $300.00 $240,000
3 15" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $250.00 $0
4 12" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $225.00 $0
5 10" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $195.00 $0
6 8" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $175.00 $0
7 Sewer Lateral 0 LF $175.00 $0
8 48" Manhole 0 EA $20,000.00 $0
9 60" Manhole 4 EA $25,000.00 $100,000
Gravity Sewer Subtotal $340,000
Contingency & Engineering 35% $119,000
Grand Total $459,000
2024-CIP-Sewer Unit Costs Ver 3.1
S3.1 - Trunk Gravity SS ASI Dr Page 5 of 10
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
S4.1
Collector Gravity Sewer
8"-12" Collector Gravity Sewer ASI Dr. (Eastern Section) No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Gravity Trunk Sewer
1 21" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $375.00 $0
2 18" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $300.00 $0
3 15" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $250.00 $0
4 12" Collector Pipeline 950 LF $225.00 $213,750
5 10" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $195.00 $0
6 8" Collector Pipeline 1,450 LF $175.00 $253,750
7 Sewer Lateral 250 LF $175.00 $43,750
8 48" Manhole 7 EA $20,000.00 $140,000
9 60" Manhole 0 EA $25,000.00 $0
Gravity Sewer Subtotal $651,250
Contingency & Engineering 35% $227,938
Grand Total $879,188
2024-CIP-Sewer Unit Costs Ver 3.1
S4.1 - Colllector SS ASI-E Page 6 of 10
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
S4.2
Collector Gravity Sewer
12" Collector Gravity Sewer ASI Dr. (Central Section)
No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Gravity Trunk Sewer
1 21" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $375.00 $0
2 18" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $300.00 $0
3 15" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $250.00 $0
4 12" Collector Pipeline 1,750 LF $225.00 $393,750
5 10" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $195.00 $0
6 8" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $175.00 $0
7 Sewer Lateral 100 LF $175.00 $17,500
8 48" Manhole 5 EA $20,000.00 $100,000
9 60" Manhole 0 EA $25,000.00 $0
Gravity Sewer Subtotal $511,250
Contingency & Engineering 35% $178,938
Grand Total $690,188
2024-CIP-Sewer Unit Costs Ver 3.1
S4.2-Colllector SS ASI-Central Page 7 of 10
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
S4.3
Collector Gravity Sewer
12" Collector Gravity Sewer ASI Dr. (West Section)
No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Gravity Trunk Sewer
1 21" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $375.00 $0
2 18" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $300.00 $0
3 15" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $250.00 $0
4 12" Collector Pipeline 600 LF $225.00 $135,000
5 10" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $195.00 $0
6 8" Collector Pipeline 1,650 LF $175.00 $288,750
7 Sewer Lateral 200 LF $175.00 $35,000
8 48" Manhole 6 EA $20,000.00 $120,000
9 60" Manhole 0 EA $25,000.00 $0
Gravity Sewer Subtotal $578,750
Contingency & Engineering 35% $202,563
Grand Total $781,313
2024-CIP-Sewer Unit Costs Ver 3.1
S4.3 - Colllector SS ASI-W Page 8 of 10
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
S4.4
Collector Gravity Sewer
8" Collector Gravity Sewer Metro Air Park Dr.

No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Gravity Trunk Sewer
1 21" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $375.00 $0
2 18" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $300.00 $0
3 15" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $250.00 $0
4 12" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $225.00 $0
5 10" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $195.00 $0
6 8" Collector Pipeline 850 LF $175.00 $148,750
7 Sewer Lateral 200 LF $175.00 $35,000
8 48" Manhole 3 EA $20,000.00 $60,000
9 60" Manhole 0 EA $25,000.00 $0
Gravity Sewer Subtotal $243,750
Contingency & Engineering 35% $85,313
Grand Total $329,063
2024-CIP-Sewer Unit Costs Ver 3.1
S4.4 -Colllector SS MAP Dr. Page 9 of 10
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
S4.5
Collector Gravity Sewer
8" Collector Gravity Sewer Cul-de-sac to NAPOTS
No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Gravity Trunk Sewer
1 21" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $375.00 $0
2 18" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $300.00 $0
3 15" Trunk Pipeline 0 LF $250.00 $0
4 12" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $225.00 $0
5 10" Collector Pipeline 0 LF $195.00 $0
6 8" Collector Pipeline 700 LF $175.00 $122,500
7 Sewer Lateral 200 LF $175.00 $35,000
8 48" Manhole 4 EA $20,000.00 $80,000
9 60" Manhole 0 EA $25,000.00 $0
Gravity Sewer Subtotal $237,500
Contingency & Engineering 35% $83,125
Grand Total $320,625
2024-CIP-Sewer Unit Costs Ver 3.1
S4.5 -Colllector SS NAPOTS Page 10 of 10
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025

6. W
ater CIP Estimate Detail
A
. Water Detailed Summary
B. Water Base Unit Prices
C. Water Estimate Sheets
Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Summary of Improvements (CIP)
Water Transmission Main
Project Segment Description Total
Project
Costs
On-Site
W1.1 On-site Water Transmission Main Conversion County to City -30" Transmission Main $1,778,629 W2.1 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" D-Main North South Easterly Connection to 30" T-Main
$280,800
W2.2 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" North South easterly Conn to Existing 8"in Westlake
$185,760
W2.3 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" ASI Drive -Eastern Segment $683,100 W2.4 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" North South Cul-De-Sac Rdwy $216,000 W2.5 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" Central North Loop (Cul-de-sac to Metro Air Parkway)
$677,700
W2.6 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" ASI Drive Central Segment $496,800 W2.7 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" Metro Air Parkway Segment $151,200 W2.8 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" Westerly Loop (Parcel 1) $1,231,200 On-Site Subtotal $5,701,189
Off-Site
Off-Site Subtotal $0
Total for Water Transmission Main $5,701,189
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
Water-Segments Page 1 of 11
Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
Item Unit 2023 Estimated
Unit Cost
12" Dia. Water /lf 160.00$
18" Dia. T-Main /lf 250.00$
24" Dia. T-Main (Elkhorn Blvd) /lf 350.00$
30" Dia. T-Main /lf 450.00$
12" D Main Tie to Existing 8" Main /ls 15,000.00$
12" D Main Tie to Existing 30" Main ea 35,000.00$
12" Welded Steel Bridge X-ing /lf 750.00$
(Cost includes welded steel pipe, supports,, etc.

Water T-Main Directional Drill /lf 1,500.00$
35% Contingency & Engineering 35%
Notes:

1. Water main per LF costs include appurtenances, valves. ARV assemblies, hydrants, etc. 2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
Utility-Base Unit Prices Page 2 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W1.1
On-site Water Transmission Main
Conversion County to City -30" Transmission Main
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia Water Shoefly at New City-County Limit 1 ls 50,000.00 $50,000 12" Dia Water Shoefly at City D-Main Tie-in 1 ls 50,000.00 $50,000 Relocate City-County Metering Station 1 ls 100,000.00 $100,000 Lump Sum T-Main Payment (City to the County) 1 ls 1,012,502.78 $1,012,503 12" D Main Tie to Existing 30" Main 3 ea 35,000.00 $105,000 Total $1,317,503
35% Contingency & Engineering $461,126
Grand Total $1,778,629
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W1.1 - On-Site Trans Main Page 3 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.1
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" D-Main North South Easterly Connection to 30" T-Main Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 1300 /lf 160.00 $208,000
Total $208,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $72,800
Grand Total $280,800
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.1 - On-Site 12" NE Page 4 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.2
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" North South easterly Conn to Existing 8"in Westlake Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 860 /lf $160.00 $137,600
Total $137,600
35% Contingency & Engineering $48,160
Grand Total $185,760
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.2 - On-Site 12" SE Page 5 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.3
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" ASI Drive -Eastern Segment
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 2600 /lf $160.00 $416,000
12" Welded Steel Bridge X-ing 120 /lf $750.00 $90,000
Total $506,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $177,100
Grand Total $683,100
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.3 - ASI E 12" Page 6 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.4
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" North South Cul-De-Sac Rdwy
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 1000 /lf $160.00 $160,000
Total $160,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $56,000
Grand Total $216,000
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.4 - North 12" to NAPOTS Page 7 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.5
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" Central North Loop (Cul-de-sac to Metro Air Parkway) Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 2700 /lf $160.00 $432,000
12" D Main Tie to Existing 30" Main 2 ea $35,000.00 $70,000 Total $502,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $175,700
Grand Total $677,700
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.5 - Middle North 12" Page 8 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.6
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" ASI Drive Central Segment
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 2300 /lf $160.00 $368,000
Total $368,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $128,800
Grand Total $496,800
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.6 - ASI Central 12" Page 9 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.7
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" Metro Air Parkway Segment
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 700 /lf $160.00 $112,000
Total $112,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $39,200
Grand Total $151,200
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.7 - Map Parkway 12" Page 10 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.8
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" Westerly Loop (Parcel 1)
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 5700 /lf $160.00 $912,000
Total $912,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $319,200
Grand Total $1,231,200
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.8 - West 12" North Loop Page 11 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025

7. Dr
ainage CIP Estimate Detail
A
. Drainage Detailed Summary
B. Drainage Base Unit Prices
C. Drainage Estimate Sheets
Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Summary of Improvements (CIP)
Trunk Drain Summary
Project Segment Descrption Total
Project
Costs
On-site Drainage
Trunk Drainage
D1.1 Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northwest Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System $1,482,759 D1.2 Detention Basin -NorthPoint South Detention Basin, Weir, Access Roads & Low Flow System $9,516,501 D1.3 Detention Basin -NorthPoint North Central Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System $1,442,006 D1.4 Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northeast Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System $905,314 D1.5 Detention Basin -Ciocca Note this is a placeholder for future estimates TBD D1.6 Detention Basin -North 4 NAPOTS Parcels Note this is a placeholder for future estimates TBD D1.7 DB Gravity Connection Under RD 1000 L Drain Gravity Connection from NE DB to the PS Under L Drain $524,300 D1.8 ASI Drainage Pump Station 35-CFS Drainage Pump Station $5,832,000 D3.1 On-Site Trunk Drainage -ASI Drive West 42" / 48" Drain Pipe $869,535 D3.2 Trunk Drainage Metro Air Parkway / Comm 36", 42", 60" Drain Pipe $1,460,228 D3.3 Trunk Drainage ASI Drive Central 36", 42", 48" Drain Pipe $1,180,136 D3.4 Trunk Drainage ASI Drive East 36", 48" Drain Pipe $1,304,370 D4.1 NorthPoiint Lands Site Import Material for CLOMR / Site Import Material $6,596,357 On-site Total $31,113,504
Off-Site Drainage
Off-site Total $0
Grand Total $31,113,504
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
CIP Trunk Drain-Summary Page 1 of 15
Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 5/31/2024
Airport Souoth Industrial
Capital Improvement Plan
Opinion of Probable Cost
Item Unit 2023 Estimated
Unit Cost
Trunk Drain
36" Drain Pipe /lf 221.00$
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) /lf 231.00$
36" Sluice Gate /ea 9,800.00$
42" Drain Pipe /lf 283.00$
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) /lf 293.00$
42" Sluice Gate /ea 12,800.00$
48" Drain Pipe /lf 346.00$
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) /lf 356.00$
48" Sluice Gate /ea 15,800.00$
54" Drain Pipe /lf 409.00$
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) /lf 419.00$
54" Sluice Gate /ea 18,800.00$
60" Drain Pipe /lf 472.00$
72" Drain Pipe /lf 535.00$
Junction Box /ea 45,000.00$
48" Manhole /ea 11,900.00$
60" Manhole /ea 17,900.00$
72" Manhole /ea 25,000.00$
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) /lf 2,000.00$
Saddle Manhole /ea 15,900.00$
Site Import (incl. placement and compaction) /cy 15.00$ Lake Detention
Clear and Grub /ac 525.00$
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) /cy 6.00$
Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) /lf 120.00$
Basin Pipe Low Flow System /lf 130.00$
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) /lf 130.00$
Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) /ea 65,000.00$
Outfall Riprap Protection /ea 4,200.00$
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe /ea 4,200.00$
Erosion Control /sf 0.05$
Connecting Pipe (36") /lf 221.00$
Access Ramp /ea 30,000.00$
Hydroseed Finish Grade /sf 0.15$
Pump Station
Drainage Pump Station /cfs 120,000.00$
RD 1000
Clear and Grub /ac 3,000.00$
Wet Excavation /cy 15.00$
Erosion Control /sf 0.10$
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) /lf 130.00$
Biological Observation /day 1,600.00$
84" Culvert Installation /lf 1,500.00$
Cofferdam & Pumping for Culvert Installation /job 30,000.00$ Inlet / Outlet Headwalls and Armor /ea 39,000.00$
Pavement Replacement (Power Linie Road) /job 35,000.00$ Traffic Control (Power Liine Road) /job 25,000.00$
Site Import
Site Import (incl. placement and compaction) /cy 15.00$ 35% Contingency & Engineering 35%
Note: Drain pipe costs include $20 / lf for dewatering. 2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
Drain-Base Unit Prices Page 2 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.1
Drainage
Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northwest
Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 7 /ac $525.00 $3,449
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 56,200 /cy $6.00 $337,200 Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 1,050 /lf $120.00 $126,000 Basin Pipe Low Flow System 1,150 /lf $130.00 $149,500
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 2,650 /lf $130.00 $344,500 Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 286,250 /sf $0.05 $15,028
Connecting Pipe (36") 225 /lf $221.00 $49,725
Access Ramp 1 /ea $30,000.00 $30,000
Hydroseed Finish Grade 286,250 /sf $0.15 $42,938
Junction Box 0 /ea $45,000.00 $0
Sub-Total $1,098,340
35% Contingency & Engineering $384,419
Grand Total $1,482,759
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.1 NP-NW DB Page 3 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.2
Drainage
Detention Basin -NorthPoint South
Detention Basin, Weir, Access Roads & Low Flow System
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 48 /ac $525.00 $25,310
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 438,400 /cy $6.00 $2,630,400 Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 6,600 /lf $120.00 $792,000 Basin Pipe Low Flow System 8,000 /lf $130.00 $1,040,000 12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 14,500 /lf $130.00 $1,885,000 Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 1 /ea $65,000.00 $65,000 Erosion Control 2,100,000 /sf $0.05 $110,250
Connecting Pipe (36") 300 /lf $221.00 $66,300
Access Ramp 1 /ea $30,000.00 $30,000
Hydroseed Finish Grade 2,100,000 /sf $0.15 $315,000
Junction Box 2 /ea $45,000.00 $90,000
Sub-Total $7,049,260
35% Contingency & Engineering $2,467,241
Grand Total $9,516,501
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.2 NP -S DB Page 4 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.3
Drainage
Detention Basin -NorthPoint North Central
Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 8 /ac $525.00 $3,977
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 72,500 /cy $6.00 $435,000 Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 550 /lf $120.00 $66,000 Basin Pipe Low Flow System 0 /lf $130.00 $0
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 2,300 /lf $130.00 $299,000 Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 330,000 /sf $0.05 $17,325
Connecting Pipe (36") 350 /lf $221.00 $77,350
Access Ramp 1 /ea $30,000.00 $30,000
Hydroseed Finish Grade 330,000 /sf $0.15 $49,500
Junction Box 2 /ea $45,000.00 $90,000
Sub-Total $1,068,152
35% Contingency & Engineering $373,853
Grand Total $1,442,006
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.3 NP -N Central DB Page 5 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.4
Drainage
Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northeast
Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 5 /ac $525.00 $2,363
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 34,800 /cy $6.00 $208,800 Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 500 /lf $120.00 $60,000 Basin Pipe Low Flow System 0 /lf $130.00 $0
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 1,850 /lf $130.00 $240,500 Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 196,250 /sf $0.05 $10,303
Connecting Pipe (36") 200 /lf $221.00 $44,200
Access Ramp 1 /ea $30,000.00 $30,000
Hydroseed Finish Grade 196,250 /sf $0.15 $29,438
Junction Box 1 /ea $45,000.00 $45,000
Sub-Total $670,603
35% Contingency & Engineering $234,711
Grand Total $905,314
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.4 NP -NE DB Page 6 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.5
Drainage
Detention Basin -Ciocca
Note this is a placeholder for future estimates
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 0 /ac $525.00 $0
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 0 /cy $6.00 $0
Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 0 /lf $120.00 $0
Basin Pipe Low Flow System 0 /lf $130.00 $0
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 0 /lf $130.00 $0
Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 0 /sf $0.05 $0
Connecting Pipe (36") 0 /lf $221.00 $0
Access Ramp 0 /ea $30,000.00 $0
Hydroseed Finish Grade 0 /sf $0.15 $0
Junction Box /ea $45,000.00 $0
Sub-Total $0
35% Contingency & Engineering $0
Grand Total TBD
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.5 NP -Ciocca DB Page 7 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.6
Drainage
Detention Basin -North 4 NAPOTS Parcels
Note this is a placeholder for future estimates
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 0 /ac $525.00 $0
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 0 /cy $6.00 $0
Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 0 /lf $120.00 $0
Basin Pipe Low Flow System 0 /lf $130.00 $0
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 0 /lf $130.00 $0
Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 0 /sf $0.05 $0
Connecting Pipe (36") 0 /lf $221.00 $0
Access Ramp 0 /ea $30,000.00 $0
Hydroseed Finish Grade 0 /sf $0.15 $0
Junction Box /ea $45,000.00 $0
35% Contingency & Engineering $0
Grand Total TBD
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.6 N Central 4 Out Parcels DB Page 8 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.7
Drainage
DB Gravity Connection Under RD 1000 L Drain
Gravity Connection from NE DB to the PS Under L Drain
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
36" Drain Pipe 70 /lf $221.00 $15,470
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $231.00 $0
36" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $9,800.00 $0
42" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $283.00 $0
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $293.00 $0
42" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $12,800.00 $0
48" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $346.00 $0
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $356.00 $0
48" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $15,800.00 $0
54" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $409.00 $0
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $419.00 $0
54" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $18,800.00 $0
60" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $472.00 $0
72" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $535.00 $0
Junction Box 1 /ea $45,000.00 $45,000
48" Manhole 0 /ea $11,900.00 $0
60" Manhole 1 /ea $17,900.00 $17,900
72" Manhole 0 /ea $25,000.00 $0
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) 155 /lf $2,000.00 $310,000 Saddle Manhole 0 /ea $15,900.00 $0
Outfall Riprap Protection 0 /ea $4,200.00 $0
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe 0 /ea $4,200.00 $0
Sub-Total $388,370
35% Contingency & Engineering $135,930
Grand Total $524,300
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.7-Gravity Conn NE DB to PS Page 9 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.8
Drainage
ASI Drainage Pump Station
35-CFS Drainage Pump Station
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Pump Station
Drainage Pump Station 35 /cfs $120,000.00 $4,200,000
Outfall and Outfall Structure -L-Drain 1 /ea $120,000.00 $120,000 Sub-Total $4,320,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $1,512,000
Grand Total $5,832,000
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.8-ASI Drain Pump Sta Page 10 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Plan
Opinion of Probable Cost
D3.1
Drainage
On-Site Trunk Drainage -ASI Drive West
42" / 48" Drain Pipe
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
36" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $221.00 $0
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $231.00 $0
36" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $9,800.00 $0
42" Drain Pipe 1500 /lf $283.00 $424,500
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $293.00 $0
42" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $12,800.00 $0
48" Drain Pipe 300 /lf $346.00 $103,800
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $356.00 $0
48" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $15,800.00 $0
54" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $409.00 $0
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $419.00 $0
54" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $18,800.00 $0
60" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $472.00 $0
72" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $535.00 $0
Junction Box 0 /ea $45,000.00 $0
48" Manhole 0 /ea $11,900.00 $0
60" Manhole 6 /ea $17,900.00 $107,400
72" Manhole 0 /ea $25,000.00 $0
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) 0 /lf $2,000.00 $0 Saddle Manhole 0 /ea $15,900.00 $0
Outfall Riprap Protection 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200 Sub-Total $644,100
35% Contingency & Engineering $225,435
Grand Total $869,535
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D3.1 - Trunk Drain ASI Drive W Page 11 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Plan
Opinion of Probable Cost
D3.2
Drainage
Trunk Drainage Metro Air Parkway / Comm
36", 42", 60" Drain Pipe
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
36" Drain Pipe 550 /lf $221.00 $121,550
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $231.00 $0
36" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $9,800.00 $0
42" Drain Pipe 800 /lf $283.00 $226,400
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $293.00 $0
42" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $12,800.00 $0
48" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $346.00 $0
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $356.00 $0
48" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $15,800.00 $0
54" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $409.00 $0
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $419.00 $0
54" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $18,800.00 $0
60" Drain Pipe 1100 /lf $472.00 $519,200
72" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $535.00 $0
Junction Box 1 /ea $45,000.00 $45,000
48" Manhole 0 /ea $11,900.00 $0
60" Manhole 9 /ea $17,900.00 $161,100
72" Manhole 0 /ea $25,000.00 $0
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) 0 /lf $2,000.00 $0 Saddle Manhole 0 /ea $15,900.00 $0
Outfall Riprap Protection 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200 Sub-Total $1,081,650
35% Contingency & Engineering $378,578
Grand Total $1,460,228
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D3.2 Trunk Drain MAP Pkwy Page 12 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Plan
Opinion of Probable Cost
D3.3
Drainage
Trunk Drainage ASI Drive Central
36", 42", 48" Drain Pipe
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
36" Drain Pipe 475 /lf $221.00 $104,975
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $231.00 $0
36" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $9,800.00 $0
42" Drain Pipe 1200 /lf $283.00 $339,600
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $293.00 $0
42" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $12,800.00 $0
48" Drain Pipe 700 /lf $346.00 $242,200
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $356.00 $0
48" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $15,800.00 $0
54" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $409.00 $0
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $419.00 $0
54" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $18,800.00 $0
60" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $472.00 $0
72" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $535.00 $0
Junction Box 0 /ea $45,000.00 $0
48" Manhole 0 /ea $11,900.00 $0
60" Manhole 10 /ea $17,900.00 $179,000
72" Manhole 0 /ea $25,000.00 $0
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) 0 /lf $2,000.00 $0 Saddle Manhole 0 /ea $15,900.00 $0
Outfall Riprap Protection 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200 Sub-Total $874,175
35% Contingency & Engineering $305,961
Grand Total $1,180,136
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D3.3 Trunk Drain ASI Dr Central Page 13 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Plan
Opinion of Probable Cost
D3.2
Drainage
Trunk Drainage ASI Drive East
36", 48" Drain Pipe
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
36" Drain Pipe 1100 /lf $221.00 $243,100
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $231.00 $0
36" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $9,800.00 $0
42" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $283.00 $0
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $293.00 $0
42" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $12,800.00 $0
48" Drain Pipe 1600 /lf $346.00 $553,600
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $356.00 $0
48" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $15,800.00 $0
54" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $409.00 $0
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $419.00 $0
54" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $18,800.00 $0
60" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $472.00 $0
72" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $535.00 $0
Junction Box 0 /ea $45,000.00 $0
48" Manhole 0 /ea $11,900.00 $0
60" Manhole 9 /ea $17,900.00 $161,100
72" Manhole 0 /ea $25,000.00 $0
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) 0 /lf $2,000.00 $0 Saddle Manhole 0 /ea $15,900.00 $0
Outfall Riprap Protection 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200 Sub-Total $966,200
35% Contingency & Engineering $338,170
Grand Total $1,304,370
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D3.4 Trunk Drain ASI Dr East Page 14 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D4.1
Drainage
NorthPoiint Lands Site Import Material for CLOMR / LOMR Site Import Material
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 300 /ac $525.00 $157,500
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 0 /cy $6.00 $0
Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 0 /lf $120.00 $0
Basin Pipe Low Flow System 0 /lf $130.00 $0
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 0 /lf $130.00 $0
Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 4,356,000 /sf $0.05 $228,690
Connecting Pipe (36") 0 /lf $221.00 $0
Access Ramp 0 /ea $30,000.00 $0
Hydroseed Finish Grade 0 /sf $0.15 $0
Site Import (incl. placement and compaction) 300,000 /cy $15.00 $4,500,000 Note: Potential Import for NAPOTS Parcels not included.

Sub-Total $4,886,190
35% Contingency & Engineering $1,710,167
Grand Total $6,596,357
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D4.1 Site Import Page 15 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025
E
nd of CIP

APPENDIX B:

Airport South Industrial Estimated
Fee Revenue from Existing and
Proposed Fee Programs

Table B-1 Estimated Fee Revenue

DRAFT
Table B-1
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Fee Revenue (2024$)
Item
Applicant
Sponsored
Future
Industrial
Highway
Commercial Total
Building Square Feet 4,688,440 949,064 80,940 5,718,444 Processing Fees $11,494,114 $2,353,441 $275,224 $14,122,779 City Development Impact Fees
Sacramento City Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) $6,139,972 $1,234,084 $92,246 $7,466,301 Water Development Fee $1,815,968 $479,813 $206,570 $2,502,352 Water Easement Tap Installation $135,022 $35,675 $15,359 $186,057 Water Meter Installation $88,374 $23,350 $10,053 $121,776 City Business Operations Tax $117,800 $31,125 $5,740 $154,665 Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) $35,340 $9,338 $2,144 $46,822 Neighborhood and Community Parks $797,035 $161,341 $32,376 $990,752 Citywide Parks $234,422 $47,453 $12,950 $294,826
Mixed Income Housing Ordinance/Housing Trust Fund $4,266,480 $863,648 $215,300 $5,345,429 Subtotal City Development Impact Fees $13,630,413 $2,885,827 $592,738 $17,108,978 Other Agency Fees
Natomas Unified School District $3,656,983 $740,270 $63,133 $4,460,386 Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $11,290,609 $3,818,747 $726,942 $15,836,298 Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $5,438,590 $1,100,914 $93,890 $6,633,394 Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $1,847,245 $373,931 $191,180 $2,412,357 SacSewer Sewage Collection Impact Fees [1] $6,182,380 $1,633,502 $351,629 $8,167,511 SacSewer Sewage Treatment Impact Fees [2] $3,037,640 $614,898 $52,441 $3,704,980 RD-1000 Drainage $535,612 $141,519 $30,464 $707,595
Subtotal Other Agency Fees $31,989,060 $8,423,781 $1,509,680 $41,922,520 ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fees
Roadways $24,419,704 $6,452,150 $1,388,897 $32,260,751
Sewer $1,047,242 $276,701 $59,563 $1,383,506
Water $2,380,031 $628,850 $135,367 $3,144,248
Storm Drainage $4,811,423 $1,271,270 $273,655 $6,356,348 Administration $979,860 $258,898 $55,731 $1,294,489
Subtotal $33,638,261 $8,887,868 $1,913,212 $44,439,341
ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee $510,599 $134,910 $29,041 $674,550 ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee $2,915,786 $770,406 $165,838 $3,852,030 Total Estimated Fee Revenue [3] $94,178,233 $23,456,233 $4,485,733 $122,120,199 Source: City of Sacramento; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] Formerly known as SASD Fee.
[2] Formerly known as Regional San Fee.
[3] The fees on this table exclude the ASI North Natomas DA fees that will apply to the ASI project. These fees are parallel to certain fees contained in the North Natomas Finance Plan, as updated.

Warehouse
Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx

APPENDIX C:

Airport South Industrial and
Metro Air Park Financial
Feasibility Comparison

Table C-1 Cost Burden Comparison per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Table C-2 Total Cost Burden Comparison for
240,000 Sq. Ft. Building
Table C-3 Estimated Cost Burden per
1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.—ASI
Table C-4 Estimated Cost Burden per
1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.—Metro Air Park
Table C-5 Estimated Taxes and Assessments per
1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Table C-6 Estimated Taxes and Assessments from
FY 2023-24 Tax Bill—Metro Air Park

DRAFT
Table C-1
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Cost Burden Comparison per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$)
Item
ASI [1] MAP Difference
Sourc
e Table C-3 Table C-4
Assumptions (acres and building square feet based on Metro Air Park Building 6) Total Net Developable Acres 18.17 18.17
Total Building Square Feet 240,000 240,000
FAR 0.30 0.30
Building Permit Processing Fees $2,436 $1,718 $718
City/County/Other Agency Development Impact Fees
Sacramento City Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) $1,315 - $1,315 Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee - MAP - $970 ($970) Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $394 $394 - City Water $361 - $361
SCWA Zone 50 (Water Development) - $1,272 ($1,272)
SacSewer Collection $1,987 $1,987 -
SacSewer Treatment $648 $648 -
City Parks Impact Fee $220 - $220
City Mixed Income Housing Ordinance/Housing Trust Fund $910 - $910 County Very Low Affordable Housing Trust Fund - $1,060 ($1,060) Miscellaneous $27 - $27
Natomas Unified School District $780 $780 -
Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $3,483 $3,483 - Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $1,160 $1,160 - Subtotal City/County Fees $11,284 $11,754 ($469)
Plan Area Fees
Development Impact Fees $10,809 $4,569 $6,240
Less Frontage [2] ($3,697) - ($3,697)
Net Development Impact Fees without Frontage $7,112 $4,569 $2,543 ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee $937 - $937
ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee $164 - $164
Subtotal Plan Area Fees $8,213 $4,569 $3,644
Total Fees $21,934 $18,041 $3,893
Less CFD Bond Proceeds [3] ($6,912) ($6,451) ($461)
Total Fees per 1,000 Building Square Feet Net of Bond Proceeds $15,022 $11,590 $3,432 Source: City of Sacramento; Sacramento County; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] The ASI fees exclude the ASI North Natomas DA fees that will apply to the ASI project. These fees are parallel to certain fees contained in the North Natomas Finance Plan, as updated. [2] Frontage portion of fee estimated below:

Total Cost: $43,144,715
Frontage Cost: $14,756,442
Frontage Pct. of ASI Fee: 34%
Estimated Frontage Fee: $3,697
[3] ASI bond proceeds per 1,000 bldg. sq. ft. = Total bond proceeds per acre/bldg. sq. ft. per acre*1.000.

See Table 4-4 for bond proceeds per acre. MAP bond proceeds per acre estimated as 93% of ASI bond proceeds per acre based on the ratio of special tax rates per acre ($7,000-MAP/$7,500-ASI).

Fee per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx DRAFT
Table C-2
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Total Cost Burden Comparison for 240,000 Sq. Ft. Building (2024$) Item
ASI [1] MAP Difference
Total Building Square Feet 240,000 240,000
Building Permit Processing Fees $584,598 $412,297 $172,301 City/County/Other Agency Development Impact Fees
Sacramento City Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) $315,550 - $315,550 Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee - MAP - $232,800 ($232,800) Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $94,560 $94,560 - City Water $86,560 - $86,560
SCWA Zone 50 (Water Development) - $305,227 ($305,227) SacSewer Collection $476,799 $476,799 -
SacSewer Treatment $155,496 $155,496 -
City Parks Impact Fee $52,800 - $52,800
City Mixed Income Housing Ordinance/Housing Trust Fund $218,400 - $218,400 County Very Low Affordable Housing Trust Fund - $254,400 ($254,400) Miscellaneous $6,500 - $6,500
Natomas Unified School District $187,200 $187,200 -
Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $835,984 $835,984 - Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $278,400 $278,400 - Subtotal City/County Fees $2,708,249 $2,820,866 ($112,617) Plan Area Fees [1]
Development Impact Fees $2,594,258 $1,096,669 $1,497,590 Less Frontage ($887,293) - ($887,293)
Net Development Impact Fees without Frontage $1,706,965 $1,096,669 $610,296 ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee $224,872 - $224,872 ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee $39,379 - $39,379
Subtotal Plan Area Fees $1,971,215 $1,096,669 $874,547
Total Fees $5,264,062 $4,329,831 $934,231
Less CFD Bond Proceeds ($1,658,855) ($1,548,265) ($110,590) Total Fees Revenue Net of Bond Proceeds $3,605,207 $2,781,566 $823,641 Source: City of Sacramento; Sacramento County; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] The ASI fees exclude the ASI North Natomas DA fees that will apply to the ASI project. These fees are parallel to certain fees contained in the North Natomas Finance Plan, as updated.

Total Fee Revenue
Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx DRAFT
Table C-3
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Cost Burden per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$) - ASI Item Warehouse Notes
Assumptions Acres and bldg. sq. ft. set equal to values for Metro Air Parkway Building 6.

ICC Group F-2
ICC Construction Type IIB
Valuation per Building Square Foot $137.64 February 2024 Total Gross Acres 18.17
Total Net Developable Acres 18.17
Total Building Square Feet 240,000
Project Valuation $33,033,600
2002 Building plus Equipment Valuations
Building Valuation per Bldg. Sq. Ft.- Type I or II Fire Resistant $49.40 Air Conditioning Valuation per Bldg. Sq. Ft. $4.20
Sprinklers Valuation per Bldg. Sq. Ft. $2.60
Total Valuation per Building Square Foot $56.20
Total Project Building and Equipment Valuation $13,488,000 Fees Current as of July 2024
per 1K Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Processing Fees
Administrative Processing Fee $1 $164 per hour, assumes 1 hour review Building Permit $680 $56,692 + $0.00462 *$ over $10 M;$20,761 + $0.005133 * $ over $3 M Technology Surcharge $54 8% of Building Permit
Plan Review Fee $596 $16,970 + $0.0042 for each dollar over $3 Million Technology Surcharge $48 8% of Plan Review Fee
Planning Projects Fee $89 15% of Plan Review Fee
Planning Inspection Fee $6 $1,344 flat rate; char ged when Planning Division performs inspections.

Seismic/Strong Motion $39 $0.00028*building valuation ($0.50 min) General Plan Recovery Fee $358 $2.60 per $1,000 of bldg. valuation Green Building/CBSC Fee $6 $1 per $25,000 of bldg. valuation or fraction, thereof Construction Excise Tax $450 0.008 * 2002 building valuation Fire Inspection Fee $110 $0.11 per bldg. sq. ft.

Fire Plan Review Fee $1 $145 per hour, assumes 1 hour review Subtotal Processing Fees $2,436
City Development Impact Fees
Sacramento City Transportation Development Impact Fee $1,315 $0.13 per sq. ft. for first 5,000 sq. ft.; $1.34 per sq. ft. for 5,001+ sq. ft.

Water Development Fee $321 Assumes 1 3" domestic meter ($55,163.58) and 1 2" irrigation meter ($21,914.87) Water Easement Tap Installation (connection) [1] $24 Assumes 1 4" domestic meter ($3,158) and 1 2" irrigation meter ($2,573) Water Meter Installation $16 Assumes 1 3" domestic meter ($2,723) and 1 2" irrigation meter ($1,028) City Business Operations Tax $21 $0.0004 per $1 of bldg. valuation; Max. $5,000/year/contractor Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) $6 Payable at grading permit.

Neighborhood and Community Parks $170
Citywide Parks $50
Mixed Income Housing Ordinance/Housing Trust Fund $910 $0.91 per sq. ft.

Subtotal City Development Impact Fees $2,833
Other Agency Fees
Natomas Unified School District $780 $0.78 per area sq. ft. (effective 10/26/2023) Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $3,483 $46,009 per gross acre at grading permit; fee without land dedication Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $1,160 $1.16 per habitable area sq. ft.(effective 7/01/2020) Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $394 $394 per 1,000 sq. ft.; effective 7/1/2024; warehouse fee SacSewer Sewage Collection Impact Fees $1,987 $26,241 per net acre (effective 7/1/24); formerly SASD SacSewer Sewage Treatment Impact Fees $648 $6,479 per ESD; 5 ESD s per 50,0000 sq. ft. (effective 7/1/24); formerly SRCSD Subtotal Other Agency Fees $8,452
ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fees [2]
Roadways $7,847 $103,649 per net developable acre
Sewer $337 $4,445 per net developable acre
Water $765 $10,102 per net developable acre
Storm Drainage $1,546 $20,422 per net developable acre
Administration $315 3% of all other ASI Devel opment Impact Fees; $4,159 per net developable acre Subtotal $10,809
ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee [2] $937 $6,926 per net developable acre ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee [2] $164 $2,167 per net developable acre Total Fees [3] $25,631
Source: City of Sacramento; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] Fee for 3" meter not available so used fee for 4" meter. [2] These fees will be charged per net developable acre. Fess shown per 1,000 bldg. sq. ft. for purposes of cost burden. [3] The ASI fees exclude the ASI North Natomas DA fees that will apply to the ASI project. These fees are parallel to certain fees contained in the North Natomas Finance Plan, as updated.

Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx DRAFT
Table C-4
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Cost Burden per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$) - Metro Air Park Item Warehouse Notes
Assumptions
ICC Group F-2
ICC Construction Type IIB
Valuation per Building Square Foot $137.64 February 2024 Total Gross Acres 18.17 Metro Air Parkway Building 6
Total Net Developable Acres 18.17
Total Building Sq. Ft. 240,000
Project Valuation $33,033,600
Fees Current as of July 2024
per 1K Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Processing Fees
Building Permit $815 60% of $228,680.66+.007418*(valuation-$20,000,000)/bldg. sq. ft.*1,000 Plan Review Fee $543 40% of $228,680.66+.007418*(valuation-$20,000,000)/bldg. sq. ft.*1,000 Zone Check Fee $71 13% of plan review fee
Seismic/Strong Motion $39 $0.00028*building valuation ($0.50 min) California Building Standards Commission Fee (Green Fee) $6 $1 per $25,000 of bldg. valuation or fraction, thereof Business Environmental Resource Center $34 0.025% of valuation Long Range Planning Fee $95 7% of total of building permit and plan review fee.

IT Cost Recovery Fee $1 4.5% of application fee with $350 maximum.

Fire Inspection Fee $110 $0.11 per bldg. sq. ft.; City fire department fee.

Fire Plan Review Fee $1 $145 per hour, assumes 1 hour review; City fire department fee.

Waste Management Plan Fee $3 $0.04 per $100 construction value; max. of $800 Subtotal Processing Fees $1,718
County Development Impact Fees
Very Low Affordable Housing Trust Fund $1,060 warehouse; $1.06 per square foot; effective 3/28/2024 Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee $970 effective 4/15/2024; warehouse fee; includes transportation, transit, & adm in.

Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $394 $394 per 1,000 sq. ft.; effective 7/1/2024; warehouse fee.

Subtotal County Development Impact Fees $2,424
Other Agency Fees [1]
Natomas Unified School District $780 $0.78 per area sq. ft. (effective 10/26/2023) Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $3,483 $46,009 per gross acre at grading permit; fee without land dedication Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $1,160 $1.16 per habitable area sq. ft. (effective 7/01/2020).

SacSewer Sewage Collection Impact Fees [2] $1,987 $26,241 per net acre (effective 7/1/24) SacSewer Sewage Treatment Impact Fees [3] $648 $6,479 per ESD; 5 ESDs per 50,0000 sq. ft. (effective 7/1/24) RD-1000 Drainage - MAP assumed to be exempt.

SCWA Zone 50 - Acreage $1,205 $15,920 per acre; e ff. 4/1/23 SCWA Zone 50 - Connection $2 $376 per connection
SCWA Zone 50 - Domestic Water Service $43 $1,143 per EDU; 1 3" domestic meter; 9 EDUs per meter.

SCWA Zone 50 - Irrigation Connection $2 $376 per connection SCWA Zone 50 - Irrigation Water Service $19 $1,143 per EDU; 1 2" irrigation meter; 4 EDUs per meter.

SCWA IT Recovery Fee $1 $350 flat fee
Subtotal Other Agency Fees $9,330
MAP Plan Area Fees [4] $4,569 Zone 2 -Airport Distribution and Manufacturing; $60,356 per net acre Total Fees per 1,000 Building Square Feet $18,041
Source: City of Sacramento; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] It is assumed that MAP does not participate in the SCWA Zone 11 drainage fee program. [2] Formerly known as SASD Fee.
[3] Formerly known as Regional San Fee.
[4] These fees will be charged per net developable acre.

Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx DRAFT
Table C-5
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Taxes and Assessments per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$) Item Percentage
Taxes per 1,000
Bldg. Sq. Ft. Notes
Assumptions
TRA 95-003
Parcel Size (acres) 18.17
Parcel Size (sq. ft.) 791,485.20
Building Square Feet 240,000
Assessed Value per 1,000 Building Square Foot (2024$) $134,152 Ad Valorem Property Taxes
General Property Tax 1.0000% $1,342
Natomas Unified GOB 0.1560% $209
Los Rios College GOB 0.0192% $26
Total Ad Valorem Taxes 1.1752% $1,577
Estimated City/Regional Special Taxes/Assessments
SAFCA Consolidated Capital Assessment District #2 [1] $42 set equal to MAP amounts.

SAFCA AD No.1 - O&M Assessment [1] $3 set equal to MAP amounts.

SAFCA Natomas Basin Local Assessment District [1] $15 set equal to MAP amounts.

City of Sacramento Core Library Services Tax $1 $22.91 per acre for first 5 acres; $5.73 for each additional acre City of Sacramento Additional Library Services Tax $2 $58. 84 per acre for first 5 acres; $14.72 for each additional acre City of Sacramento AD L & L $8 $1,880.14 per parcel for parcels >100,000 sq. ft.

Reclamation District No. 1000 Stormwater Assessment $5 $0.03 per $100 valuation*$23,000 per acre Reclamation District No. 1000 Stormwater Fee $21 $328.73 per impervious acre * 0.86 impervious factor Total Estimated Special Annual Taxes/Assessments $97
Estimated Airport South Maintenance CFD $219 $2,886 per net acre Estimated Airport South Infrastructure CFD $568 $7,500 per net acre Total Annual Taxes and Assessments $2,460
Source: City of Sacramento; Sacramento County; EPS.

Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx DRAFT
Table C-6
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Taxes and Assessments from FY 2023-24 Tax Bill - Metro Air Park Item Percentage
per 1,000
Bldg. Sq. Ft. Total
Assumptions
APN 201-1020-151
TRA 95-016
Parcel Size (acres) 18.17
Building Square Feet 240,000
Assessed Value (2024$) $134,152 $32,196,514
Ad Valorem Property Taxes
General Property Tax 1.0000% $1,342 $321,965
Natomas Unified GOB 0.1560% $209 $50,227
Los Rios College GOB 0.0192% $26 $6,182
Subtotal 1.1752% $1,577 $378,373
County and Regional Direct Levies [1]
SAFCA Consolidated Capital Assessment District #2 $42 $10,029 SAFCA AD No.1 - O&M Assessment $3 $674
SAFCA Natomas Basin Local Assessment District $15 $3,539 Reclamation District No. 1000 Stormwater Service Fee $22 $5,173 Reclamation District No. 1000 $4 $1,003
Water and Drainage Studies - SCWA 13 $1 $251
CSA 1 Lights Sac Unicorp Zone 1 $0 $3
Subtotal $86 $20,672
Metro Air Park CFD 2000-1 Services $23 $5,508
Metro Air Park CFD 2000-1 Facilit
y $528 $126,774
Total Annual Taxes and Assessments $2,214 $531,327
Source: City of Sacramento; Sacramento County; EPS.
[1] From property tax bill for FY 2023-24.

Property Taxes [1]
Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx RESOLUTION NO.

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council

November 18, 2025

RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS (P21-017)

BACKGROUND

A. On June 26, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on, and forwarded to the City Council its recommendation for approval of the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project, and

B. On November 18, 2025 after giving notice as required by Sacramento City Code section 17.812.010 (2)(b), the City Council conducted a public hearing on the Project, receiving and considering evidence concerning it.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project, the City Council approves the Project entitlements based on the findings of fact and subject to the conditions of approval as set forth below.

Section 2 The City Council approves the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project entitlements based on the following Findings of Fact:

C. The Tentative Master Parcel Map to subdivide ±352 acres into 25 master parcels in the Light Industrial Planned Unit Development (M-1-PUD), Highway Commercial Planned Unit Development (HC-PUD), and within the Airport South Industrial Planned Unit Development (PUD) is approved based on the following Findings of Fact:

1. None of the conditions described in Government Code Section 66474, subsection (a) through (g), inclusive, exist with respect to the proposed subdivision as follows:

a. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code;

b. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and

specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code;

c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development;

d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development;

e. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as explained in the Environmental Impact Report;

f. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems.

g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

2. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the City General Plan and Title 17 Subdivisions of the City Code, which is a specific plan of the City (Gov.

Code §66473.5);

3. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing community sewer system will not result in a violation of the applicable waste discharge requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Board, Central Valley Region, in that existing treatment plants have a design capacity adequate to service the proposed subdivision (Gov. code §66474.6);

4. The design of the proposed subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities (Gov. Code §66473.1);

5. The City Council has considered the effect of the approval of this Tentative Master Parcel Map on the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code §66412.3).

D. 200-Year Flood Protection Finding Consistent with State Law (SB 5) and Planning and Development Code Section 17.810:

1. State Law (SB 5) and Planning and Development Code chapter 17.810 require that the City must make specific findings prior to approving certain

entitlements for projects within a flood hazard zone. The purpose is to ensure that new developments will have pr otection from a 200 -year flood event or will achieve that protection by 2025. The project site is within a flood hazard zone and is an area covered by SAFCA’s Improvements to the State Plan of Flood Control System, and specific findings related to the level of protection have been incorporated as part of this project. Even though the project site is within a flood hazard zone, the local flood management agency, SAFCA, has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system that will ens ure protection from a 200 -year flood event or will achieve that protection by 2025. This is based on the SAFCA Urban level of flood protection plan, adequate progress baseline report, and adequate progress toward an urban level of flood protection enginee r’s report that were accepted by City Council Resolution No. 2016 -0226 on June 21, 2016, and the SAFCA 2024 Adequate Progress Annual Report accepted by City Council Resolution No. 2024-0311 on October 22, 2024.

C. The Tentative Master Parcel Map to subdivide ±352 acres into 25 master parcels in the Light Industrial Planned Unit Development (M-1-PUD), Highway Commercial Planned Unit Development (HC-PUD), and within the Airport South Industrial Planned Unit Development (PUD) is approved subject to the following Conditions of Approval:

NOTE: These conditions shall supersede any contradictory information shown on the Tentative Master Parcel Map or any contradictory provisions in the PUD guidelines approved for this project (P21-017). The design of any improvement not covered by these conditions or the PUD Guidelines shall be to City standard.

The applicant shall satisfy each of the following conditions prior to filing of any phased Final Map unless a different time for compliance is specifically stated in these conditions. Any condition requiring an improvement that has already been designed and secured under a City Approved improvement agreement may be considered satisfied at the discretion of the Department of Public Works.

The City strongly encourages the applicant to thoroughly discuss the conditions of approval for the project with their Engineer/Land Surveyor consultants prior to City Planning Commission approval. The improvements required of a Tentative Map can be costly and are completely dependent upon the condition of the existing improvements. Careful evaluation of the potential cost of the improvements required by the City will enable the applicant to ask questions of the City prior to project approval and will result in a smoother plan check process after project approval:

Public Works: Anis Ghobril, (916) 808-5367
C1. Execute a Development Agreement to the satisfaction of the City of Sacramento and comply with and meet all the requirements of the Agreement.

C2. Comply with requirements included in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan developed by, and kept on file in, the Planning Division Office (P21-017).

C3. The applicant shall create and participate in the Airport South Industrial Finance Plan and pay all appropriate fees to the satisfaction of the Department of Finance.

C4. Title to any property required to be dedicated to the City in fee shall be conveyed free and clear of all rights, restrictions, easements, impediments, encumbrances, liens, taxes, assessments or other security interests of any kind (hereafter collectively referred to as "Encumbrances"), except as provided herein. The applicant shall take all actions necessary to remove any and all Encumbrances prior to approval of the Final Map and acceptance of the dedication by City, except that the applicant shall not be required to remove Encumbrances of record, including but not limited to easements or rights-of-way for public roads or public utilities, which, in the sole and exclusive judgment of the City, cannot be removed and/or would not interfere with the City's future use of the property.

The applicant shall provide title insurance with the City as the named beneficiary assuring the conveyance of such title to City.

C5. Show all existing and proposed/required easements on the Final Map.

C6. Multiple Final Maps may be recorded. Prior to recordation of any Final Map all infrastructure/improvements necessary for the respective Final Map must be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Utilities, Planning Division, and the Department of Public Works.

C7. Submit a Geotechnical Analysis prepared by a registered engineer to be used in street design. The analysis shall identify and recommend solutions for groundwater related problems, which may occur within both the subdivision lots and public right-of-way.

Construct appropriate facilities to alleviate those problems. As a result of the analysis street sections shall be designed to provide for stabilized subgrades and pavement sections under high groundwater conditions.

C8. Multiple access points will be required for all phases of the Final Parcel Map to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Dead end streets must be less than 500' in length and must include a turn-around approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department.

C9. Provide additional right-of-way for expanded intersections at intersections to be signalized and other locations specified by the Department of Public Works.

C10. The applicant shall provide a signing and striping improvement plan if new signage or striping is proposed; or if existing signing and/or striping is removed or relocated. The plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C11. All right-of-way and street improvement transitions that result from changing the right-of- way of any street shall be located, designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The center lines of such streets shall be aligned.

C12. The design and placement of walls, fences, signs and Landscaping near intersections and driveways shall allow stopping sight distance per Caltrans standards and comply with City Code Section 12.28.010 (25' sight triangle). Walls shall be set back 3' behind the sight line needed for stopping sight distance to allow sufficient room for pilasters.

Landscaping in the area required for adequate stopping sight distance shall be limited to

3.5' in height. The area of exclusion shall be determined by the Department of Public Works.

C13. The applicant shall install permanent street signs to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

C14. The applicant shall make provisions for bus stops, shelters, bus turnouts, etc. to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works in consultation with Regional Transit.

C15. The applicant shall dedicate and construct Airport South Industrial Drive (ASI Drive) as a modified Local Industrial Street section as shown on the approved tentative map per City standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C16. The applicant shall design and construct two canal crossings (bridge/culverts) along ASI Drive. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from RD1000 and any other affected agencies and construct the canal crossings to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C17. The applicant shall coordinate with the County of Sacramento to utilize existing right of way along Power Line Road and construct a southbound left turn pocket onto eastbound ASI Drive. Widening of Power Line Road at ASI Drive to accommodate the left turn pocket shall provide for all needed roadway transitions (north and south of ASI Drive) per the CA MUTCD/HDM and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall relocate any existing utilities or power lines to accommodate the installation of the left turn pocket to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C18. The applicant shall construct curb returns with increased curb radius and taper at the intersection of ASI Drive and Power Line Road and at the intersection of Metro Air Parkway and ASI Drive to accommodate a WB-67 design vehicle/truck ensuring that trucks can turn without conflicting with opposing lanes to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C19. The applicant shall dedicate and construct the segment of Metro Air Parkway within the boundary of this tentative map as a 4-lane arterial roadway. Metro Air Parkway will be constructed with an expanded intersection at the proposed signalized commercial driveways consistent with the street section shown on the approved tentative map per City standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Any interim Roadway Transitions (Roadway, sidewalks, bike lanes, etc.) shall be designed and constructed per the CA MUTCD/HDM standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C20. Provide slope easements and additional right-of-way, if necessary, for Metro Air Parkway and any canal crossings to the satisfaction of the Departments of Public Works and Utilities.

C21. Dedicate and construct A Drive and B Drive per the street sections shown on the approved tentative map per City standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C22. The applicant shall construct the segment of Bayou Road from B Drive to A Drive as a

one-way roadway heading from west to east consistent with the street section shown on the approved tentative map to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall provide all needed signage and pavement marking indicating a one-way street to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C23. Construct traffic signals at the following intersections when warranted or with any phased final map creating the commercial parcels (if not already in place):

a. Metro Air Parkway and Highway Commercial driveways.

NOTE: The Department of Public Works shall determine the need for signals, based on Caltrans signal warrants and known pending development projects prior to the Issuance of any building permit. If required, signals shall be constructed as part of the public improvements for the Final Map. Signal design and construction shall be to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall provide all on-site easements and right-of-way needed for turn lanes, signal facilities and related appurtenances. The applicant shall install CCTV cameras and all necessary appurtenances if deemed necessary by and to the satisfaction of the Transportation Division (Signal Operations Section).

C24. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Signal Design Concept Report (TSCDR) per section

15.10 of the City’s Design and Procedures Manual to the Department of Public Works for review and approval prior to the submittal of any improvement plans involving traffic signal work. The TSCDR provides crucial geometric information for signal design which may lead to additional right-of-way dedication and should be started as early as possible to avoid delays during the plan check process.

C25. The applicant shall dedicate sufficient right of way and construct a roundabout at the intersection of A Drive and Bayou Road per City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The roundabout shall have sufficient radii to accommodate a WB-67 design vehicle/truck turning. Trucks shall be prohibited from traveling east onto Bayou Way from the roundabout. The applicant shall provide for all needed signage and pavement marking to restrict truck access to the east. The design and construction of the roundabout shall provide for all required signing plans, striping plans, street lighting plans, pedestrian crossings and islands, and landscaping plans to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C26. The applicant shall submit a roundabout design concept report to the Department of Public Works for review and approval prior to the submittal of any improvement plans involving the roundabout or any phased final map adjacent to the roundabout . The roundabout design concept report shall provide crucial geometric information and signage and markings package for the design of the roundabout which may lead to additional right-of- way dedication and should be started as early as possible to avoid delays during the plan check process.

C27. The proposed access easement located on the east side of Parcel 4 shall be constructed with a standard driveway along ASI Drive and gated at a minimum distance of 20-feet from the back of walk to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C28. All proposed elbows and cul-de-sacs shall be constructed per City standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C29. Construct A.D.A. compliant ramps per City standards at all intersections and as directed by the Department of Public Works. All crosswalks shall be disability access compliant to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C30. Prior to recording any phased final map, the applicant shall obtain and submit all required abandonment clearance letters for any proposed abandonments within the pha sed map boundary and shall satisfy all conditions of approval of the abandonment.

C31. Prior to the submittal of improvement plans for any phase of this project, the developer’s design consultant(s) shall participate in a pre-design conference with City staff. The purpose of this conference is to allow City staff and the design consultants to exchange information on project design requirements and to coordinate the improvement plan review process. Contact the Department of Public Works, Development Services Section Plan Check Engineer to schedule the conference. It is strongly recommended that the conference be held as early in the design process as possible.

C32. The applicant shall initiate and complete formation of a maintenance district (either an assessment district or a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District) or annex the project to an existing maintenance and services district prior to recordation of a final master parcel map, or at the time of approval of a conditional use permit or site plan and design review permit, whichever occurs first unless a different compliance timeline is specifically stated in the condition. Additionally, the applicant is responsible for paying all city fees associated with the formation or annexation of these special districts.

C33. With each phase of the Final Master Parcel Map dedicate to the City those areas identified on that phase of the Tentative Master Parcel Map as Landscape Corridors, Freeway Buffers, and Open Space areas. Annex the project area to the appropriate Landscape Maintenance District, or other financing mechanism acceptable to the City, prior to recordation of the Final Map. Design and construct landscaping and irrigation in dedicated easements or rights of way, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, Parks Planning, Design and Development (PPDD), and the Planning Division. Acceptance of the required landscaping and irrigation by the City into the Landscape Maintenance District shall be coordinated with the Department of Public Works (Special Districts and Development Services) and PPDD. The Developer shall maintain the landscaping and irrigation for two years or until acceptance by the City into the District (whichever is less). The two-year period shall begin following the issuance of a notice of completion by the City for the landscaping and irrigation.

C34. Form a Business Owners Association (BOA). CC&R's shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of any common areas, landscape parcels, shared driveways, etc.

ELECTRICAL: John Matoba, (916) 808-7891
C35. This project will require the installation of streetlights on all public streets to the satisfaction of Public Works. This will require the electrical design plans to be prepared and stamped by a registered civil or electrical engineer submitted with the major

encroachment permit application. The Developer will determine the quantity and locations of streetlights based upon the City Lighting Standards. In general, the City Lighting Standard for illumination follows the IES RP-8 guidelines: Lighting Zone 1) the illumination levels are 0.10 footcandles minimum for residential applications and Lighting Zone 2) the illumination levels are 0.20 footcandles for non-residential applications. The illumination levels for crosswalks and signalized intersections shall meet the American National Standard Institute (ANSI)/Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) RP- 8guidelines. A photometric analysis is required for the first Cycle submission. Residential lighting shall be the City Standard ornamental streetlights. SMUD Rate Schedule: A new metered service pedestal with SMUD service point is required for the installation of all streetlights. New streetlights cannot be connected to an unmetered service pedestal.

SMUD: Ellen Springer, (916) 732-5989
C36. SMUD has existing overhead 12/69kV facilities along Powerline Rd, Del Paso Rd, along the northside of the West Drainage Canal and Bayou Way and on the project site that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 95 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

C37. Structural setbacks less than 14-feet from the road R/W shall require the Applicant to conduct a pre-engineering meeting with SMUD to ensure property clearances are maintained.

C38. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD easement or PUE. This will be determined prior to SMUD performing work on the Applicant’s property.

C39. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applicant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal.

C40. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible for any damages to the developed property within said easement that unreasonably interferes with those needs.

C41. The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5-feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.).

C42. In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement (PUE) for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD.

C43. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD equipment, transformer location, service conductors).

Information regarding SMUD siting requirements can be found at:
https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutions-and-Rebates/Design-and-Construction-

Services

C44. The Applicant shall provide separate SMUD service points to each parcel to the satisfaction of SMUD.

C45. The Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to all public street rights-of-ways.

C46. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20-foot wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and appurtenances shall be within 15 feet from the drivable surface.

C47. The Applicant shall dedicate a 20-foot easement for future 69kV routes that will be required to connect the new substation into SMUD’s Distribution System. Associated future overhead 69kV will be installed all along Airport South Industrial Dr. from Powerline Rd to S. Bayou Way/El Centro Rd If a 12.5-foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) is also required along these streets, the 12.5-foot PUE will be located directly adjacent to the street right-of-way, with the 20-foot 69kV easement directly adjacent to the PUE.

C48. The Applicant shall disclose existing or proposed 69kV electrical facilities to future and/or potential owners.

C49. The Applicant shall designate a parcel of land for an electric substation to be acquired by SMUD with an approximate size of 250-feet by 250-feet of net useable area (approximately 62,500 square feet of net usable area). There shall be no deviations from this requirement until SMUD’s Grid Planning section evaluates design criteria for the site.

C50. The tentative location of the substation shall be on Parcel 1 or 2. It is SMUD’s preference that substations be placed in areas that are zoned Industrial or Commercial.

Prior to the Map Recordation of the final map, the exact size and location of the substation site shall be determined by mutual agreement of SMUD and the Applicant.

C51. Substation sites shall be unencumbered; the sites shall not contain jurisdictional wetlands, sensitive species, cultural resources, or hazardous wastes or materials.

C52. Lot A, B and C, Detention/Retention Basins. Please work with SMUD Design to ensure sufficient clearance for basins near the existing SMUD facilities.

C53. Lot H is situated between two basins (Lots A & B). There appears to be a pipe connecting between these two basins directly running through Lot H. Non-SMUD or third party utilities are not allowed within site, such as storm drains, water main/pipe, gas mains, vaults, ducts, pull boxes / manholes, pole risers and other existing infrastructure.

C54. See SMUD Substation General Requirements, Distribution Substation General Requirements and Planning Guide AUG 2022.

C55. Substation straight access roads must be at least 20’ wide.

 If there are any turns along the access road to the substation, the road must be able to accommodate the crane and low boy trailer as specified in Pages 14 and 15 of this document.
 If the substation site is not directly adjacent to a main street right-of-way, a 24-hour access easement to the substation shall be required.  An access easement from a public road of sufficient size to accommodate the crane and trailer requirements shall be obtained.
 Substation driveway access easement shall be minimum 40’ long from ROW and shall be minimum 40’ wide.
 Driveway design shall confirm no vertical and horizontal obstructions within turning radius of heavy haul equipment trailer and crane.  Substation entrance shall accommodate service trucks and an 80-ton, 9- axle steerable heavy haul equipment trailer (low boy) with an inside turning radius of 50’-1” and an outside turning radius of 71’-4” for transformer delivery. Gate openings are typically 24’-30’ wide.  Structural sections of driveways including any crossing bike path, sidewalk, utilities and other infrastructure shall be designed to accommodate low boy trailer and 350-ton crane. Section and details shall be provided to SMUD for review and concurrence.
 In a commercial parking lot situation, a simple re-entry thru-gate with adequate turning radius and easement rights to cross and enter is sufficient.
 Crane and equipment trailer are typically permitted loads that exceed H-25 loading.

SASD: Zoe Wu, (916) 875-0283
C56. PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Annexation through the Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to SacSewer’s service areas will be required for sewer service.

C57. PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: For this project, SacSewer requires a sewer study prior to the submittal of improvement plans for plan check to SacSewer. The sewer study shall demonstrate the quantity of discharge and any “flow through sewage” along with appropriate pipe sizes and related appurtenances from this subject and other upstream areas and shall be done in accordance with SacSewers’ most recent “Minimum Sewer Study Requirements”. The study shall be in conformance with SacSewer’s most recent System Capacity Plan and done on a no “Shed-Shift” basis unless approved by SacSewer in advance and in compliance with SacSewer Design Standards.

C58. PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: For projects requiring a new pump station, SacSewer requires a pump station and force main design report prior to the submittal of improvement plans for plan check to SacSewer.

C59. PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: The Project proponents propose connecting the Project area’s sewage collection facilities to the SacSewer New

Natomas Pump Station (NNPS) through proposed and existing SacSewer facilities. The Project area was never intended to be provided service by the SacSewer NNPS, Lower Northwest Interceptor (LNWI), or the South River Pump Station (SRPS) during the design of these facilities. Allowing connection of the Project area may result in significant capacity constraints within the existing SacSewer collections and interceptor systems.

To allow connection to the NNPS, the proposed sewer pump station shall be designed to accommodate 4-hours of upstream buildout peak wet weather flow inline emergency storage. The Project proponents should work closely with SacSewer to ensure proper connection to any existing SacSewer facilities. Necessary improvements to address capacity constraints shall be evaluated in the Level 3 sewer study and the pump station and force main design report.

C60. PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: To obtain sewer service, construction of SacSewer sewer infrastructure will be required. The SacSewer Standards and Specifications at the time of approval of improvement plans shall apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer construction or modification.

C61. PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: All onsite sewer plans and offsite sewer plans must be submitted separately to SacSewer for review and approval.

C62. PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Construction of sewer mainlines is prohibited within 100-year flood plains. The location of the 100-year flood plain must be shown on the improvement plan.

C63. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: The owner must contact Permit Services Unit at [email protected] or by phone at (916) 876-6100 to determine if SacSewer impact fees are due. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. SacSewer does not guarantee sewer service or system capacity, either permanent or interim, to the property until the property obtains proper permits to connect to the system and pays all sewer impact fees.

RD 1000: Jeff Kashiwada, (916) 993-4630
C64. Reclamation District No. 1000 (RD 1000) provides flood control and drainage services to the area impacted by the proposed development. The applicant will be required to complete a drainage study to identify impacts of the project on our drainage system and to identify improvements, both on-site and off-site, necessary to mitigate these impacts to the satisfaction of RD 1000.

C65. The applicant will be required to enter into a Funding Agreement with RD 1000 to reimburse our costs incurred with our technical reviews or other services associated with the proposed project, to the satisfaction of RD 1000.

C66. The applicant will be required to enter into a Drainage Improvement Agreement with RD 1000 and the City of Sacramento to implement the improvements identified in the drainage study and to pay the RD 1000 Development Impact Fee, all to the satisfaction of RD 1000.

C67. The properties will be subject to RD 1000 assessments and fees based on the land use designations post development.

C68. The proposed Project and the drainage improvements shall not interfere with improvements proposed adjacent to the development by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and SAFCA along the West Drainage Canal as part of the ARCF Natomas Basin Project.

DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES: Saraí Ochoa Jimenez, (916) 808-5426 C69. All existing easements and all existing right-of-ways shall be shown on the Final Map, except for all abandoned easements and right-of-ways.

C70. Dedicate all necessary easements, IOD easements right-of-way, IOD to Lot A, B, C, D, E, and G for detention basins and drainage pump station, or IOD in fee title property on the final map as required to implement the approved drainage and water studies. If required, easements shall be dedicated for off-site water and storm drain main extensions. Street right-of-way shall be dedicated for common water and drainage pipes identified in the water and drainage master plan. All dedications shall be at no cost to the City and shall be free and clear of all encumbrances and liens and shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU.

C71. The applicant shall provide continuous and uninterrupted water supply with the exception of approved short-term shutdowns to the County’s water system serving the Sacramento International Airport and Metro Air Park during the construction of the project. This can include identification or construction of an additional point of connection to the City water system serving Sacramento International Airport and Metro Air Park to satisfaction of the DOU and the County of Sacramento. Any proposed short-term shutdowns for temporary parallel facilities shall be to the satisfaction of the Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA). Any proposed short-term shutdowns for temporary parallel facilities shall be to the satisfaction of the Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA). The applicant shall provide an approved document from the SCWA for the proposed temporary shutdown to the DOU.

C72. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the improvement plans, the applicant shall coordinate with Sacramento County and the Sacramento International Airport on the submittal of a risk assessment that shall be reviewed and approved by both agencies and shall be to the satisfaction of Sacramento County and the Sacramento International Airport. Prior to approval of the improvement plans a copy of the approved risk assessment shall be provided to the DOU.

C73. The applicant shall dedicate a 20-foot-wide water pipeline easement and ingress/egress easements to Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) centered on the 16-inch, 30- inch and 24-inch County water pipelines to the satisfaction of the SCWA.

C74. The transfer of the 30-inch County water transmission main to the City from the SCWA will require reimbursement to the County for the depreciated value of the transmission main. The reimbursement will be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Prior to the submittal of the improvement plans, the applicant shall come to an agreement with the SCWA, SMF, and DOU, on the County transmission main connection, reimbursement,

and any SCWA requirements. If an agreement is not reached and the transfer of ownership of the 30-inch water t-main does not occur, a revised design of the water system for the Airport South Industrial will be required prior to the submittal of the improvement plans.

C75. The applicant shall relocate and construct the City/County metering station including and not limited to the meter, electrical equipment, and power to the location as specified in the accepted preliminary water study, or as otherwise approved by the DOU and Sacramento County.

C76. The applicant shall dedicate a minimum 23-foot wide water pipeline easement centered over all portions of the current SCWA 30-inch water transmission main that will be transferred to the City, to the satisfaction of the DOU.

C77. Prior to the submittal of the subdivision improvement plans, the existing Preliminary Water Study will be required to be updated for review and approval by the DOU. The water distribution system shall be designed to satisfy the more critical of the two following conditions: (1) at maximum day peak hour demand, the operating or "residual" pressure at all water service connections shall be at least 30 pounds per square inch, (2) at average maximum day demand plus fire flow, the operating or "residual" pressure in the area of the fire shall not be less than 20 pounds per square inch. The water study shall determine if the existing and proposed water distribution system is adequate to supply fire flow demands for the project. A water supply test may be required for this project. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Development Review Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any water related requirements. Failure to submit the water study may delay review and approval. (Note: Any proposed modifications to the accepted preliminary water study will require a resubmittal to be reviewed and approved by the DOU.)

C78. Two points of service for the public water distribution system for this subdivision or any phase of this subdivision are required. All City water mains shall be placed within the asphalt section of public right-of-ways as specified in the City’s Design and Procedures Manual or within dedicated City easements as approved by the DOU. (Note: Public mains are not permitted to be located within median areas. Dual water mains may be required where there are medians located within the street.)

C79. The applicant shall coordinate with RD 1000 and Natomas Central Mutual Water Company on any proposed water main crossings through the existing canals adjacent to the East of the property line of the Tentative Master Parcel Map (TMPM) Lands.

C80. The applicant shall dedicate a water easement (minimum 15-ft width centered over the water main) for the proposed City water distribution mains located outside the public right-of-way or as otherwise approved by the DOU.

C81. Prior to submittal of the subdivision improvement plans, the existing Preliminary Drainage Study will be required to be updated for review and approval by the DOU. The applicant shall complete a drainage master plan as it pertains to the pump station requirements and project site modeling demonstrating no impacts to the RD 1000 system for the entire site (including non-mapped lands outside the TMPM but included as part of the LAFCo Annexation process). Assumptions shall be made for the proposed

detention and water quality facilities for parcels not included as part of the TMPM but included in the annexation. Amendments to the drainage master plan shall be performed in the future for those developments.

C82. All City drainage lines shall be placed within the asphalt section of public-right-of-ways as per the City’s Design and Procedures Manual or within dedicated public easements as approved by the DOU. The drainage master plan is required to show the sizes of all common trunk lines in the street right-of-ways. If required, the drainage master plan shall include basins designed and constructed for flood control and water quality treatment.

The proposed drainage facilities and flood control/water quality basin shall be sized to handle storm drain runoff from the Airport South Industrial developed lands. The drainage study analysis shall also demonstrate that existing offsite flows that drain across the project site are not negatively impacted and/or blocked by the development of this project. The design shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU. The DOU shall review and approve the drainage master plan. The drainage study shall meet the criteria specified in the current Design and Procedures Manual. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Drainage Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any drainage related requirements and design criteria.

C83. A soils study prepared by a California licensed geotechnical engineer is required for proposed onsite detention systems. The soil study shall include a groundwater analysis demonstrating that the soil is shown to allow a maximum drawdown time of 48 hours and recommendations to address potential infiltration into the detention basins. If the project area has groundwater infiltration, an impermeable clay liner, pumping, or other DOU approved equivalent (reference Design and Procedures Manual section 11.9.4, 11.9.7 and11.9.8 for approved alternates) shall be used to control groundwater infiltration and shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU. If a clay liner is not used, a net present value alternative analysis shall be provided addressing any increased operational cost. Developer’s potential share of operation costs for groundwater infiltration control will be explored with the processing of the design-level drainage study and / or the Common Drainage Improvement Plans prepared for the project.

C84. Prior to vertical construction, the applicant shall construct the detention basin, a drainage pump station and discharge pipes, construct inlet and outlet structures, and frontage improvements for the detention basins and pump station that will be located on Lots A, B, C, D, E and Lot G per the approved Drainage Master Plan and shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU. Applicant shall submit a separate set of improvement plans for the detention basin design and drainage pump station (common drainage facilities). The CIP Drainage Group within the DOU shall review these plans. Prior to design of these facilities, the applicants’ engineer shall meet with the CIP Drainage Group to discuss design standards. Common drainage facility design and construction may be phased as determined in the Drainage Master plan and shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU. The drainage study shall be modified to address each phase of the project and shall be approved by RD-1000 and the DOU.

C85. Prior to the initiation of water and storm drainage service to the development, a privately funded maintenance district or a homeowner’s association (HOA) shall be formed and C.C.&R’s shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of water and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities within the common areas. Private

easements shall be dedicated for these facilities. The CC&Rs must provide that the City- approved provisions regarding water and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities may not be revised without City consent. If required by the DOU, the responsible maintenance agency shall enter into and record an agreement with the City regarding the maintenance of these facilities. The agreement shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU and the City Attorney.

C86. The applicant shall provide a financing mechanism acceptable to the City for the landscape maintenance of the proposed detentions basins (e.g. create a maintenance district, annex into an existing landscape maintenance district, etc.). The developer shall maintain the basin facility for a period of two (2) years. The two-year period shall begin following the issuance of a notice of completion by the City for the Detention Facility.

Prior to acceptance of maintenance responsibilities by the City the developer shall remove any sediment or debris that has accumulated and shall confirm the basin complies with all the design standards per the approved basin plans. A maintenance plan and guidelines will be required for all City owned and maintained detention basins.

The City will review and provide guidance to the applicant for the preparation and completion of the maintenance plan. (Note: The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Water Quality Section (916-808-7890) to request a sample maintenance plan.)

C87. The widening improvements Power Line Road and/or any future road shall not negatively impact the design and operation of the detention basins and/or City DOU owned facilities within the project boundaries.

C88. A post and cable fence shall be constructed around the City detention basins shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU.

C89. Any proposed weir(s) in the access roads surrounding any City detention basins shall be designed such that DOU maintenance vehicles can safely drive above the 100-year water surface elevation.

C90. The project is located in two Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), designated as A99 and A zones on Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). Per City Code Chapter 15.108.40 "Floodplain Risk Notifications", construction of any structure located in a SFHA requires the execution of a Hold Harmless Agreement with the City, regarding risk of flooding.

C91. Prior to any building permit issuance, the applicant is required to obtain an approved Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. Prior to any certificate of occupancy, an approved Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA is required. If FEMA is unwilling to review or issue a CLOMR or LOMR based on other plans or timing associated with the larger picture of the future Natomas Basin A99 Revisions, then the applicant assumes responsibility to explore alternative methods and work with the City to allow site development within the SFHA Zone A areas pending FEMA approval.

C92. All structures within the SFHA zone shall have their finished floors elevated to a minimum of 1.0 foot above the base flood elevation, once established by FEMA through the CLOMR process or as otherwise determined by the DOU. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant is advised to contact the Development Services Floodplain

Section at 916-808-7890 for questions regarding flood requirements. (Note: There is a Natomas Basin Hydraulic Model that is currently being finalized.)

C93. This project is currently using the latest RD1000's XPSWMM model, however, there is a new HEC-RAS interior drainage model for this area which has been submitted to FEMA for preliminary review. Once approved, this model will be used to evaluate all the interior levees for the entire Natomas basin area. Proceeding with the current XPSWMM carries risk in that there is uncertainty in the final water surface elevations. If the developer proceeds with the current model prior to the HEC-RAS model being finalized, the developer will need to accept all risk and acknowledge there may be a potential for updating their models and designs once the data is available.

C94. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the building permit application, the applicant shall, through the preparation of the Drainage Study for the project shall demonstrate the project will not increase flood heights for any portion of the project located within the SFHA(s). The Drainage Study and associated modeling shall be supported by technical data satisfying FEMA requirements and signed by a registered professional engineer.

C95. Per City Code, the applicant may not develop the project in any way that obstructs, impedes, or interferes with the natural flow of existing off-site drainage that crosses the property. The project shall construct the required public and/or private infrastructure to handle off-site runoff to the satisfaction of the DOU. If private infrastructure is constructed to handle off-site runoff, the applicant shall dedicate the required private easements, and/or, at the discretion of the DOU, the applicant shall enter into and record an Agreement for Maintenance of Drainage with the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

C96. A grading plan showing existing and proposed elevations is required. Adjacent off-site topography shall also be shown to the extent necessary to determine impacts to existing surface drainage paths. No grading shall occur until the grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the DOU.

C97. This project will disturb more than one acre of land; therefore, the project is required to comply with the State’s “Construction General Permit”. To comply with the State Permit, the applicant must file a Notice of Intent (NOI) through the State’s Storm Water Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). A valid WDID number must be obtained and provided to the DOU prior to the issuance of any grading permits.

C98. Post construction (permanent), stormwater quality control measures shall be incorporated into the development to minimize the increase of urban runoff pollution caused by development of the area. The project is in an area not served by an existing regional water quality control facility and/or the project has more than one-acre of new or modified impervious area, therefore, Low Impact Development (LID), Hydromodification Management Plan (HMP), certified full capture trash control devices and on-site treatment control measures will be required. The on-site storm water treatment control measures required may affect site design and site configuration and should be considered during early planning stages.

C99. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all necessary permits, easements, and

approvals from federal, state (Caltrans), and local agencies for the construction of this project.

C100. The proposed development is located within the Reclamation District 1000 (RD 1000).

The applicant shall comply with all RD 1000 requirements.

C101. Obtain written approval from RD 1000 and the Natomas Central Mutual Water Company for the abandonment and/or relocation of any existing canals and provide a copy of the written approvals to the DOU.

C102. Obtain written approval from RD 1000 for any proposed connections to their canals and provide a copy of the written approval to the DOU.

FIRE: King Tunson, (916) 808-1358
C103. Upon submitting improvement plans for review, provide means of identifying that the farthest projection of the exterior wall of a building shall be accessible from within 150 ft of an approved Fire Department access road (minimum 20’ wide) and approved water supply as measured by an unobstructed route around the exterior of the building. (California Fire Code Sections 503.1.1, 507.5.1)

C104. Upon submitting improvement plans for review, identify that all turning radii for fire access shall be designed as 35’ inside and 55’ outside. California Fire Code Section 503.2.4

C105. Upon submitting improvement plans for review, identify that fire hydrants have been provided in accordance with California Fire Code Section 507 and Appendix C, Section C102.1 as amended the Sacramento City Code Section 507.5.1.

C106. Fire service mains shall not cross property lines unless a reciprocal easement agreement is provided.

C107. A reciprocal ingress egress agreement shall be provided for review by City Attorney for all shared driveways being used for Fire Department access.

C108. Maintenance agreements shall be provided for the interior private roadways of the proposed complex and for the private fire protection systems. The agreement shall be record with the Public Recorders Office having jurisdiction and shall provide for the following:
a. Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of the roadway surface b. Removal of vegetation overgrowing the roadway and infringing on the roadway clear vertical height of thirteen feet six inches (13’6”) and/or width of twenty feet (20’) c. Provisions for the maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signage or striping
d. Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of vehicle and pedestrian access gates and opening systems
e. Unrestricted use of and access to the roadways covered by the agreements. f. Provisions for the control of vehicle parking in prohibited areas and a mechanism for the removal of vehicles illegally parked.

g. Maintenance and timely repair of all fire protection systems, including but not limited to hydrants, fire alarm systems and fire sprinklers.

SPECIAL DISTRICTS: Mary Jean Rodriguez, (916) 808-1980
C109. The applicant shall annex to the North Natomas Transportation Management Association (TMA) or other TMA.

C110. The applicant shall initiate and complete formation of a maintenance district (assessment or Mello-Roos CFD district); or annex the project to an existing maintenance district prior to recording a Final Subdivision Map. The applicant shall pay all City fees for formation of or annexation to special districts.

ADVISORY NOTES:

The following advisory notes are informational in nature and are not a requirement of this Tentative Map:

ADV1. The development agreement includes special conditions related to the construction and widening of the Metro Air Parkway interchange, ramps and other off-site improvements as listed in the phasing and fair share analysis memorandum prepared by DKS Associates. The construction and widening of the Metro Air Parkway interchange, including other off-site improvements as listed in the phasing plan will be required once development applications (Site Plan and Design Review and building permits) are submitted as noted in the Development Agreement, special conditions section. The widening and construction of the Metro Air Parkway interchange shall be consistent with the approved County of Sacramento plans for said interchange. Any work on the interchange will require at a minimum coordination with Caltrans and the County of Sacramento, an encroachment permit from Caltrans, plan check review from the County of Sacramento, Caltrans and the City of Sacramento.

ADV2. The proposed development is located within the Sacramento Area Sewer District (SacSewer). Satisfy all SacSewer requirements. A copy of the approved sewer master plan shall be provided to the DOU to assure there are no conflicts with water and/or drainage facilities within the proposed streets and/or City easements.

ADV3. On October 24, 2023, and November 14, 2023, City Council adopted Resolutions 2023- 0338 and 2023-0368, respectively, to adjust the Water System, Sewer, and Combined Sewer Development Fees, as well as establish the Storm Drainage Development Fee to align with updated Nexus Studies. These resolutions provide for an effective date for the new Utility Development Fees as of January 22, 2024. (Note: Based on the proposed detention basins and drainage pump station associated with this project, Storm Drainage Development Fees will not apply.)

ADV4. As per City Code, the applicant will be responsible to meet his/her obligations regarding:
a. Consideration for continuation of off-street shared path at Egret Park and Open Space with trail connections within the industrial and commercial developments. b. Title 18, 18.56 Park Development Impact Fee, due at the time of issuance of building permit. The Park Development Impact Fee is estimated at $1,072,399. The Park Development Impact Fee due for this project is based on the Remainder of City Rate

of $0.56 per square foot for retail and commercial services projects, $0.76 per square foot for commercial office projects, and $ 0.22 per square foot for industrial projects.

Any change in these factors will change the amount of the PIF due. The fee is calculated using factors at the time that the project is submitted for building permit.

ADV5. The applicant shall participate in the ASI Public Facilities Finance Plan, adopted by City Council, and as updated, and pay all required fees and shall execute any, and all agreements, which may be required, in order to implement this condition.

ADV6. Require site plan in AutoCAD 2022 for SMUD feasibility study.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – Tentative Master Parcel Map

DEL PASO RD

POWER LINE RDAIRPORT BLVD

LONE TREE RDW ELKHORN BLVDMETRO AIR PKWYN BAYOU RD INTERHIGHWAY 99INTERNATIONALSACRAMENTOSITEPROJECTBAYOUWAYSTATE5 AIRPORT CITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTYCITY OF SACRAMENTONORTHNTS 1382'250'±52'200'151'403'306'1545' 138'93'168'83'
1177'942'250'±
457'338'
1925'2171'
94'
965'380'
2633'
232'360'448'180'384'70'110'75'38'44'324'160'335'239'170'322'335'628' 943'
72'341'225'233'125'61'402'293'274'722'
2266'
350'196'125'47'156'165'194'202'126'265'902'1030'85'370'76'313'197'325'128' 2672'2207'
94'905'691'194'846'25'805'642'
101'148'52'200'1011'78'52'18'78'332'267'399'399'208'126'127'398'427'123'22'1016'50'60'252'252'180'259' 463'229'395'381'411'488'411'297'988'655'341'344'314'296'314' 211'277'351' 2232'
24'350'24'170'39'11'350'963'1314'
1302'502'47'
655'290'207'61'166'989'47'256'
215'40'39'332'108'
244'
388'
189'100'22'19'
1304'
795'
496'39'244'298'41'338'
250'±250'±
134'
R=121'R=121'139'75'
INTERSTATE 5
35' WIDE CANAL BOTTOM/ DEPTH = 10' 2:1 SLOPE50' BUFFER
35' WIDE CANAL BOTTOM/ DEPTH=10' 2:1 SLOPE
INTERSTATE 5
2:1 SLOPE

METRO AIR PRKWY
S. BAYOU WAY
BAYOU

TO BE ABANDONED
POWER
50' BUFFER

LOTDDETENTION/RETENTIONBASIN

LOTCDETENTION/RETENTION BASIN
LOTADETENTION/RETENTIONBASINPARCEL6CHC3.9 ± AC. (G)3.1 ± AC. (N)PARCEL7CHC1.5 ± AC. (G)1.3 ± AC. (N)PARCEL1INDUSTRIAL48.7 ± AC. (G)46.8 ± AC. (N)PARCEL2INDUSTRIAL51.3 ± AC. (G)49.4 ± AC. (N) PARCEL3INDUSTRIAL34.6 ± AC. (G)33.2 ± AC. (N)PARCEL4INDUSTRIAL52.2 ± AC. (G)50.2 ± AC. (N) PARCEL5AINDUSTRIAL11.8 ± AC. (G)11.4 ± AC. (N)
SCALORAAPN: 225-0030-045BK. 225, PG. 003(NAPOTS)

8.0 ± AC. (G)7.9 ± AC. (N)

32.6 ± AC. (G)32.3 ± AC. (N)

10.9 ± AC. (G)9.1 ± AC. (N)8.8 ± AC. (G)7.6 ± AC. (N)

SOUTH BAYOU WAY
"A"DRIVE

DRIVEINDUSTRIALSOUTHAIRPORT

TO BE ABANDONED
LOTFSEWER PUMPSTATION1.0 ± AC. (G)0.7 ± AC. (N)LOTGDRAINAGE PUMPSTATION1.1 ± AC. (G)0.9 ± AC. (N) PARCEL6AHC1.9 ± AC. (G)1.9 ± AC. (N)PARCEL6BHC1.9 ± AC. (G)1.4 ± AC. (N) PARCEL7BHC2.1 ± AC. (G)1.4 ± AC. (N)
PARCEL7AHC4.4 ± AC. (G)3.9 ± AC. (N)
PROP. 61' CANAL (35' WIDE @ BOTTOM W/ 2:1 SIDE SLOPES (NOTE) 60' EXISTING CANAL ESMT)

PROPOSEDBRIDGE/CULVERT
ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAYAND OTHER RIGHTSPER 340 OR 529RELINQUISHED FREEWAYABUTTER'S RIGHTS OF INGRESSAND EGRESS PER 5350 OR 193RELINQUISHED FREEWAY ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OFINGRESS AND EGRESS PER 5317 OR 395RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OFNATOMAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR DITCHES,ROADS AND OTHER STATED ITEMS.EASEMENT TO ELKHORN MUTUAL WATER COMPANYFOR DITCH OR CANAL AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSESPER 492 OR 324RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OFNATOMAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FORDITCHES, ROADS AND OTHER STATED ITEMS(TO BE ABANDONED)EASEMENT TO ELKHORN MUTUAL WATERCOMPANY FOR DITCH OR CANAL ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES PER 492 OR 324(TO BE ABANDONED)PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES PER 558 OR 24(TO BE ABANDONED)RIGHTS RESERVED ON THEOFFICIAL PLAT OF NATOMASCOMPANY OF CALIFORNIAFOR DITCHES, ROADS ANDOTHER STATED ITEMS.IRRIGATION ANDDRAINAGE EASEMENTPER 5326 OR 293(TO BE ABANDONED)DRAINAGE CANALEASEMENTPER 20191024 OR 1565PUBLIC ROADWAY ANDPUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENTPER 20150915 OR 1232(TO BE ABANDONED)ABOVE GROUND PUBLICUTILITY FACILITIES EASEMENTPER 20191024 OR 1569(TO BE ABANDONED) ELECTRICAL FACILITES EASEMENTPER 1223-B OR 268
RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE OFFICIALPLAT OF NATOMAS COMPANY OFCALIFORNIA FOR DITCHES, ROADSAND OTHER STATED ITEMS. 10' CANAL RESERVATIONPER 16 BM 3
15' CANAL RESERVATION PER 16 BM 3 RWESMT TO NATOMAS CENTRAL MUTUALWATER COMPANY PER 589 OR 18435' PRIVATE ROAD & CANALRESERVATION PER 16 BM 3CL OF SMUD ESMTPER 1387 OR 33, SUBJECT TORW GRANTED TO RD 1000 FORDRAINAGE CANAL ALONGWESTERLY SIDE OF LOT 90(NO WIDTH STATED)25' PRIVATE ROAD & CANALRESERVATION PER 16 BM 320' DRAINAGE CANAL ESMTTO RD1000 PER BK 76, PG 388POLE LINE EASEMENTPER 1321-A OR 494ELECTRICAL FACILITES EASEMENTPER 1223-B OR 271ELECTRICAL FACILITES EASEMENTPER 1223-B OR 270 OVERHEAD POWER LINEPOLES FURTHER THAN 4' FROME. EDGE OF CANAL 20' RD1000 ESMTPER 5331 OR 130
50' RD1000 ESMTPER 5331 OR 130R=1000' TRANSITION BACK TOEXISTING RURAL POWERLINE ROAD

EXISTING CELLULAR TOWERTRANSFORMER ANDFENCED AREA
R=1000'

NO TRUCK ACCESS EASTTO SOUTH BAYOU WAY
PROPOSED 50-FOOTWIDE WEIR
EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAYAND PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTALPURPOSES, PER 20150915 OR 1232(TO BE ABANDONED)ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OFINGRESS AND EGRESS TOOR FROM FREEWAY HAVEBEEN RELINQUISHED, PER670303, OR 204EASEMENT FOR PUBLICROADWAY AND PUBLICUTILITIES AND INCIDENTALPURPOSES, PER 20150915OR 1232RIGHTS RESERVED ON THEOFFICIAL PLAT OF NATOMASCOMPANY OF CALIFORNIAFOR DITCHES, ROADS ANDOTHER STATED ITEMS.EASEMENT TO PACIFICTELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.FOR COMMUNICATIONSFACILITIES AND THE RIGHT OFACCESS THERETO ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER3844 OR 80 EASEMENT FOR IRRIGATIONAND DRAINAGE CANALSAND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES,PER 670303 OR 195 EASEMENT FOR IRRIGATIONAND DRAINAGE CANALS ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER670303 OR 195 COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO201-0291-026RIVER ROCKINVESTMENTS LLC201-1020-055COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-021RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1000225-0010-034 COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-021COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-017COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-009COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-010COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-011COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO225-0010-013NP MAP AND LANDHOLDINGS LLC225-0010-015NP MAP AND LANDHOLDINGS LLC225-0010-014NATOMAS BASINCONSERVANCY225-0020-013NATOMAS BASINCONSERVANCY225-0020-012 RECLAMATIONDISTRICT 1000225-0030-012DHR CAPITAL LLC225-0030-060 CITY OF SACRAMENTO225-1480-053CITY OF SACRAMENTO225-1480-056CITY OF SACRAMENTO225-1480-020STATE OF CALIFORNIA225-0030-050GRAND STAFF2010 TRUST225-1590-008MENGI 225-1590-009BRAH 225-1590-010MONTEMAYOR 225-1590-011BASSI225-1590-012MITROS225-1590-013HENDERSON225-1590-014THOMAS225-1590-015GARTNER225-1590-016WILLIAM J & RITA JBOWEN 2007REVOCABLE TRUST225-1590-017BUTTERMAN 225-1590-018MOIN225-1590-019DURETTE225-1590-020CHU225-1590-021HUANG225-1590-022MOMOH225-1590-023MAYO225-1590-024JOHN225-1590-025MCARDLE225-1590-026CLYDE225-1830-009FONG225-1830-010AHMADI225-1830-011FRIES225-1830-008 COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO201-1020-092COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO201-1020-090KOSAREFF201-1020-147RIVER ROCKINVESTMENTS LLC201-1020-140RIVER ROCKINVESTMENTS LLC201-1020-139WILLIAM LINN201-1020-030LINN JUNE C1999 TRUST201-1020-056GREENBRIAR PROJECTOWNER LLC201-0300-183GREENBRIAR PHASE 2 LLC201-1510-025 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1000225-0020-011RIGHTS RESERVED ON THEOFFICIAL PLAT OF NATOMASCOMPANY OF CALIFORNIAFOR DITCHES, ROADS ANDOTHER STATED ITEMS.EASEMENT TO PACIFICTELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.FOR COMMUNICATIONSFACILITIES AND THE RIGHT OFACCESS THERETO ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER3844 OR 80 EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIESAND PUBLIC FACILITIES ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES,PER 20180308 OR 0529EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGECANAL OR DITCH ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES,PER 20191024 OR 1567EASEMENT FOR ABOVEGROUND PUBLIC UTILITYFACILITIES ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES,PER 20150915 OR 1229(TO BE ABANDONED) EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGECANAL OR DITCH ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES,PER 20191024 OR 1565(TO BE ABANDONED) EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGECANAL OR DITCH ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES,PER 20191024 OR 1565(TO BE ABANDONED) ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESSTO OR FROM FREEWAY HAVE BEENRELINQUISHED, PER 20180308 OR 0528EASEMENT TO NATOMAS CENTRAL MUTUAL WATERCOMPANY FOR IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ANDINCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 5350 OR 187EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE CANAL ORDITCH AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES,PER 20191024 OR 1567 RELINQUISHMENT OFACCESS PER GRANTDEED, BK 5317, PG 395
RELINQUISHMENT OFACCESS PER GRANT DEED,BK 5331, PG 124RELINQUISHMENTOF ACCESS PERDIRECTOR'S DEED,BK 861021 PG 0434RELINQUISHMENT OFACCESS PER GRANTDEED, BK 5331, PG 124 25' PRIVATE ROAD & CANALRESERVATION PER 16 BM 3OVERHEADPOWER LINE EXISTING PROPERTYLINE (TYP.)
AF1
B GROUNDWATERMONITORINGWELL #2
GROUNDWATERMONITORINGWELL #1
D
C16.9 ± AC. (G)14.9 ± AC. (N)PARCEL5CINDUSTRIAL9.4 ± AC. (G)8.1 ± AC. (N)PARCEL5DINDUSTRIAL6.5 ± AC. (G)6.2 ± AC. (N)SOUTH BAYOUROW2.2 ± AC. (G)2.2 ± AC. (N) LOTBDETENTION/RETENTION BASIN32.3 ± AC. (G)31.6 ± AC. (N) PARCEL5EINDUSTRIAL2.6 ± AC. (G)2.3 ± AC. (N)PARCEL5FINDUSTRIAL2.1 ± AC. (G)2.1 ± AC. (N) "B"DRIVE
82'
82'

67.5'75'
75'
63'R=75'
R=75.5' 102'
R=84'R=55'R=84'R=61'R=84'R=200'
60'
PROPOSED 20'BIKE AND WATERLINE EASEMENTPARCEL13INDUSTRIAL1.5 ± AC. (G)1.2 ± AC. (N) 119'APN: 225-0020-032BK. 225, PG. 002CALTRANSROW(NAPOTS)ISGURAPN:225-0030-024BK. 225, PG. 003(NAPOTS)PATELAPN: 225-0030-028BK. 225, PG. 003(NAPOTS)E SANGSTER(NAPOTS) G
R=400'R=400'SUBDIVISIONMODIFICATION#2

CAL TRANS RIGHT-OF-WAY

CAL TRANS RIGHT-OF-WAY

PROPOSED PRIVATEACCESS EASEMENT
S. BAYOU WAYLANFRANCOLANFRANCOCIRCLECIRCLECRESTHAWKCIRCLELANEMONETTA

OLD SOUTH BAYOU WAYABANDONMENT ENDS HEREOLD SOUTH BAYOU RIGHT-OF-WAYTO BE ABANDONED BY STATE OFCALIFORNIA VIA SEPARATE PROCESSIN THE FUTURE A1
SACRAMENTO COUNTYCITY OF SACRAMENTO82'
82'82'
/EL CENTRO ROAD60'
OFFSITE RIGHT-OF-WAY TOBE DEDICATED BY OTHERS.
63'63'
OLD S.RW TBA100'SUBDIVISIONMODIFICATION#3

TO BESOUTH BAYOU WAYABANDONED
SACRAMENTO COUNTYCITY OF SACRAMENTOEXISTING PROPERTYLINE (TYP.) PROPOSED 24' ACCESSEASEMENT TO SANGSTERPROPERTY (APN 225-0020-032) R=342'
R=199'R=201'
R=156'
LOTHSMUDSUBSTATION1.8 ± AC. (G)1.4 ± AC. (N)LINEROADF2
A
R=500'PARCEL5BINDUSTRIALSUBDIVISIONMODIFICATION#1
PROPOSED 20' EASEMENTFOR FUTURE SMUD 69kV LINESEEDETAILB

67.5'PROPOSED 20' EASEMENTFOR FUTURE SMUD 69kV LINELOTEDETENTION/RETENTION BASIN 75' STREET SECTION"A" DRIVE (MODIFIED 2-LANE LOCAL INDUSTRIAL)NTSB6'-6"3'6'12'WALKTRAVEL LANE37'-6"CLCR/W75'5' 6'-6"3'6'12'WALKTRAVEL LANE37'-6"R/W5' 63' STREET SECTIONNTSCCLC63'6'-6"5'WALK31'-6"R/W5'"B" DRIVE (LOCAL INDUSTRIAL)12'TRAVEL LANE6'-6"5'WALK31'-6"5'12'TRAVEL LANE

67.5' STREET SECTIONAIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVENTSA1(MODIFIED 2-LANE LOCAL INDUSTRIAL)12' LANDSCAPEMEDIAN OR TWOWAY TURN LANE6'12'TRAVEL LANE26'CLCR/W70.5'6'-6"6'12'WALKTRAVEL LANE44'-6"R/W12'PARCEL1SCALORA225-0030-045 PARCEL5BPARCEL5D
3'3'BIKELANEBIKELANE
3'PUE12'-6"
PUE12'-6"
PUE12'-6"
PUE12'-6"
PUE12'-6"
12' LANDSCAPEMEDIAN OR TWOWAY TURN LANE
R/WSUBDIVISION MODIFICATION #2 FOR CUL-DE-SAC
5'5'BIKELANEBIKELANESMUD EASEMENT FORFUTURE 69kV LINE20' 82' STREET SECTIONAIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVENTSA(MODIFIED 2-LANE LOCAL INDUSTRIAL)12' LANDSCAPEMEDIAN OR TWOWAY TURN LANE6'-6"3'6'12'WALKTRAVEL LANE37'-6"CLCR/W82'5' 6'-6"6'12'WALKTRAVEL LANE44'-6"R/W12'PARCEL1PARCEL2 3'PUE12'-6"PUE12'-6" SMUD EASEMENT FORFUTURE 69kV LINE20'
SMUD EASEMENT FORFUTURE 69kV LINE20'P.L.ROADSIDEDITCH5'BIKELANE5'BIKELANE 5'BIKELANE5'BIKELANE3'
NORTHNTS119' STREET SECTIONMETRO AIR PARKWAY (MOD. 4-LANE ARTERIAL ROADWAY)NTSF16'-6"11'5'WALKTURN LANE58'CLCR/W119'11'TURN LANE5' 6'-6"11'5'WALKTRAVEL LANE61'R/W14'TURN LANE5'BIKELANEBIKELANE11'TRAVEL LANE2'3'12'TRAVEL LANE11'TRAVEL LANEMEDIANBIKEBUFFERPUE12'-6"PUE12'-6" 102' STREET SECTIONMETRO AIR PARKWAY (MOD. 4-LANE ARTERIAL ROADWAY)NTSF26'-6"6'WALK58'CLCR/W102'5' 6'-6"11'6'WALKTRAVEL LANE44'R/W11'TURN LANE5'BIKELANEBIKELANE11'TURN LANE3'11'TRAVEL LANEMEDIANBIKEBUFFERPUE12'-6"PUE12'-6"12'TRAVEL LANE5'3'AT AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE 59' STREET SECTIONBAYOU WAY AT EL CENTRO ROADNTSETWO WAYTURN LANE6'6'6'12'WALKTRAVEL LANE35'CLCR/W59'5' 10'6'12'TRAVEL LANE24'R/W6'BIKELANEBIKELANE EXISTING40' R/WEXISTING40' R/W
82'EXISTING 18'PAVEMENTR=121'R=121'LOT HSMUDSUBSTATIONLOT ADETENTIONBASINGANORTHNTS50' RIGHT-OF-WAYPOWER LINE ROADNTSG9±'25'9±'22±'P.L.A.S.I. PROPERTYTRAVELLANETRAVELLANE3±'EXISTING DRAINAGE CANAL(DEPTH UNKNOWN)4+'EXISTINGPOWERLINE POLEEXISTINGPOWERLINE POLE15'EXISTINGPAVEMENT40'25'SACRAMENTO COUNTY 2-LANE COLLECTOR ROAD STANDARDEXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENTTO SACRAMENTO COUNTYEXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENTTO SACRAMENTO COUNTYEXISTING CANAL & ROADWAY EASEMENTTO RD1000 NTSDONE WAYLANE12'TRAVEL LANE8'±SOUTH BAYOU ROAD (EAST BOUND ONE WAY STREET)8'±PAVEDSHOULDER(P) GUARDRAIL15'±SHOULDER60' ROW50' RD1000 EASEMENT17'±28'±EXISTING PAVEMENTPAVEDSHOULDEREXISTINGCALTRANSR/WCANAL

VICINITY MAP
TENTATIVE MASTER PARCEL MAPAIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIALCITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIAFEBRUARY 21, 2025 TENTATIVE MASTER PARCEL MAP - AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIALBUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME3301 C St, Bldg. 100-BTel 916.341.7760Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 958162004000NORTH800

PROJECT NOTES
NOTES1) SUBDIVIDER(S) RESERVES THE RIGHT TO FILE MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS PURSUANT TO SECTION 66456.1 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAPACT.2) EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY WOOD RODGERS AND WAS FLOWN IN 2021.3) OWNER WILL DEDICATE ALL EASEMENTS AND I.O.D.S NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ALL UTILITIES.4) THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.5) THIS EXHIBIT IS FOR TENTATIVE MAP PURPOSES ONLY. ALL SITE CHARACTERISTICS ARE TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO FINAL MAP.6)THE NORTH HALF SECTION OF SOUTH BAYOU WAY TO BE ABANDONED AND DEDICATED TO THE ADJACENT SANGSTERLIVING TRUST PARCEL (APN: 225-0020-032).

RECORD OWNERNP MAP LAND HOLDING CO LLC1410 ROCKY RIDGE DR., SUITE 110ROSEVILLE, CA, 95661CONTACT: GEOFF GRIFFINPHONE: (916) 316-3562APPLICANTAVDIS & CUCCHI, LLP1415 L STREET, SUITE 410SACRAMENTO, CA, 95814CONTACT: NICHOLAS AVDIS, PARTNERPHONE: (916) 659-7500PLANNER/ENGINEERWOOD RODGERS INC.3301 'C' STREET, BLDG. 100BSACRAMENTO, CA 95816CONTACT:MARK RODGERS, PE #41540STAN METTEPHONE: (916) 341-7760ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS225-0020-010, -016, -017, -021,-022, -023, -024, -026, -027,-030, -033, -034, -035225-0030-023 AREA352.0 ± ACRES GROSSNUMBER OF PARCELS 11 INDUSTRIAL LOTS 6 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL LOTS 7 PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC LOTS 24 PARCELS TOTALEXISTING USEVACANTPROPOSED USESEE LAND USE SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGAG-20, AG-80(COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO)PROPOSED ZONINGHC-PUD, M-1-PUD(CITY OF SACRAMENTO)PARK DISTRICTCITY OF SACRAMENTOFIRE PROTECTIONCITY OF SACRAMENTO

SCHOOL DISTRICTNATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOLDISTRICTSEWERCITY OF SACRAMENTOSTORM DRAINCITY OF SACRAMENTOWATERCITY OF SACRAMENTOELECTRICITYSMUDGASPG&ELAND USE SUMMARYSOUTH BAYOU ROADRIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENTSOUTH BAYOU RIGHT-OF-WAY TOREMAIN EAST OF INDUSTRIAL ROAD DETAIL A:

NTSPOWER LINE ROADPROPOSED AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVESOUTH BAYOU RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BEABANDONED FROM THE WEST LIMITS OFCALTRANS RIGHT-OF-WAY TO LIMITS OFTHE OLD SOUTH BAYOU RIGHT-OF-WAYOWNED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.POWER LINE ROAD-AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE INTERSECTIONDETAIL B:

NTS
SUBDIVISION1.NON-STANDARD STREET SECTION.NO SIDEWALK IS PROPOSED ONTHE NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHBAYOU ROAD FROM THEROUNDABOUT EAST TO ELCENTRO ROAD CONSISTENTWITH THE EXISTING EL CENTROROAD/SOUTH BAYOU 2-WAYCROSS SECTION.2.NON-STANDARD STREET SECTIONAND CUL-DE-SAC ON B DRIVECONNECTION, EASEMENTAND ACCESS NORTH TO THESANGSTER LIVING TRUST(NAPOTS) PARCEL.3.EXISTING COUNTY STREET THATDOES NOT MEET CITYSTANDARDS TO BE CONVERTEDTO NON-STANDARD EASTBOUNDONE-WAY LOCAL INDUSTRIALSTREET.

N.A.P.O.T.S.N.A.P.O.T.S.INTERSTATE 5
MODIFICATIONS:

PORTION OF OLD SOUTH BAYOURIGHT-OF-WAY OWNED BY THESTATE OF CALIFORNIA TO BEABANDONED VIA SEPARATE STATEPROCESS IN THE FUTURE AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVEPOWER LINE ROADR=500'R=500'EXISTINGPAVEMENTIS SHADEDB DRIVE

CALTRANS R/W

CALTRANS R/WTRANSR/WCAL
SIDEWALKENDS HEREEXPAND POWER LINEROAD/ASI DRIVE CURB RETURNTO ACCOMMODATE WB-67TURNING RADII SOUTHBOUNDLEFT TURN LANE AT AIRPORTSOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE.A.S.I. BOUNDARYEXISTING DRAINAGE CANALR/W RESOLUTION NO.

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
November 18, 2025
AMENDING THE CITY’S BICYCLE MASTER PLAN TO INCORPORATE THE BIKEWAY

FACILITIES NETWORK IN THE AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P21-017)

BACKGROUND
A. As stated in the 2040 General Plan in policy M-1.17, the City shall plan for a continuous, low-stress bikeway network consisting of bicycling-friendly facilities that connect neighborhoods with destinations and activity centers throughout the city.

B. On March 20, 2025, the City Active Transportation Commission held a public hearing on the Airport South Industrial Planned Unit Development and received and considered evidence, and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to approve amending the City Bicycle Master Plan as set forth in Exhibit A.

C. On June 26, 2025, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on the Airport South Industrial Planned Unit Development, and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to approve amending the City Bicycle Master Plan as set forth in Exhibit A.

D. On November 18, 2025, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given under Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010 and 17.812.030.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearings on the Airport South Industrial Annexation, the City Council finds that amending the City Bicycle Master Plan to modify the bikeway network in Airport South Industrial project area is consistent with the City’s general plan goal to plan for a low-stress bikeway network consisting of bicycling-friendly facilities that connect neighborhoods with destinations and activity centers throughout the city.

Section 2. City Council hereby amends the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to include the Airport South Industrial bicycle network as set forth in Exhibit A.

Section 3. Exhibit A is part of this resolution.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – Airport South Industrial Annexation Bicycle Plan Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on November 18, 2025, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

LOT EDETENTION/RETENTION BASIN

LOTDDETENTION/RETENTIONBASIN

LOTC DETENTION/RETENTION BASIN
PARCEL1INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL2INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL3INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL4INDUSTRIALPARCEL5BINDUSTRIAL
PARCEL5CINDUSTRIAL
PARCEL5DINDUSTRIALPARCEL5AINDUSTRIALPARCEL5EINDUSTRIAL

LOTB DETENTION/RETENTION BASIN
PARCEL6CHCPARCEL7CHC
PARCEL6AHCPARCEL6BHC
PARCEL7BHC
PARCEL7AHC
PARCEL5FINDUSTRIAL PARCEL13INDUSTRIAL
SCALORAAPN: 225-0030-045BK. 225, PG. 003(NAPOTS)
APN: 225-0020-032BK. 225, PG. 002CALTRANSROW(NAPOTS)ISGURAPN:225-0030-024BK. 225, PG. 003(NAPOTS) PATELAPN: 225-0030-028BK. 225, PG. 003(NAPOTS)

SANGSTER(NAPOTS)
SEWERPUMPSTATIONSTATIONPUMPDRN.

1.1 ± AC. (G)0.9 ± AC. (N)1.0 ± AC. (G)0.7 ± AC. (N)

LOTHSMUDSUBSTATION

LOTADETENTION/RETENTIONBASIN
GENERAL PLAN BIKEWAY DIAGRAMAIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIALCITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIAFEBRUARY 26, 2025

AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL - GENERAL PLAN BIKEWAY DIAGRAM BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME3301 C St, Bldg. 100-BTel 916.341.7760Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816 0 NORTH250
500
1000

LEGENDCLASS I SHARED USE PATHCLASS II BIKE LANECLASS III BIKE ROUTE INTERSTATE 5

AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE

METRO AIR PKWY

POWER LINE ROAD
"B" DRIVE
"A" DRIVE
S. BAYOU WAY/
EL CENTRO RD.

RESOLUTION NO.

ADOPTED BY THE SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL

November 18, 2025

APPROVAL OF WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED AIRPORT

SOUTH INDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION PROJECT

BACKGROUND

A. State law (Water Code Section 10910) requires a water supply and demand analysis (Water Supply Assessment) for development projects of a certain size or type, which would include the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project, based on the City's Urban Water Management Plan.

B. The Water Supply Assessment evaluates projected water supplies, determined to be available by the City for the project during normal, single dry and multiple dry years over a 20 year period. The City prepared the Water Supply Assessment for the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project.

C. On June 26, 2025, the City Planning and Design Commission held a noticed public hearing on the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project in accordance with Government Code Sections 65353 and 65453, received and considered evidence, and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to adopt the entitlements for the project.

D. On November 18, 2025 the City Council conducted a noticed public hearing in accordance with Government Code Sections 65355 and 65453, considered the Environmental Impact Report, and received and considered evidence concerning the entitlements for the project.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Water Supply Assessment for the proposed Airport South Industrial Annexation Project, dated February 24, 2023, and attached hereto, is approved.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – Water Supply Assessment

City of Sacramento General Plan. The Sacramento 2040 General contains goals and policies to guide provisions for the City. Applicable policies that support the Airport South Industrial project are provided below.

LUP-1.4 City Services Prior to Annexation. Prior to the provisions of City services to new development in unincorporated areas, the City shall require that the unincorporated properties be annexed into the City. Alternatively, the City may provide utility service to properties in advance of annexation only if the annexation process has been initiated and the landowner and City have executed a conditional agreement for services that stipulates minimum standards for the development of roads and urban infrastructure and criteria and conditions for annexation into the City.

LUP-1.1 Coordinate to Protect Farmland. The City shall continue to work with Sacramento County and other adjacent jurisdictions to implement conservation plans, preserve farmland and protect critical habitat outside the city.

LUP-1.12 Development Adjacent to Agriculture. The City shall require open space or other appropriate buffers for new development abutting productive agricultural areas to protect the viability of active agricultural operations outside of the city and ensure compatibility of uses with residents in adjacent areas.

LUP-1.13 Airport Land Use Compatibility. The City shall work with the Sacramento County Airport System (SCAS) and the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) to ensure that new development near the area's airports is compatible with airport operations, adopted ALUC policies, and applicable Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans.

LUP-2.5 Design for Connectivity. The City shall require that all new development maximizes existing and new connections with surroundings and with centers, corridors, parks, and neighborhoods to enhance efficient and direct pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle movement. When feasible, grid patterns should be utilized to facilitate multiple routes.

LUP-4.6 Compatibility with Adjoining Uses. The City shall ensure that the introduction of higher-intensity mixed-use development along major arterial corridors is compatible with adjacent land uses, particularly residential uses, by requiring features such as the following: • Buildings set back from rear or side yard property lines adjoining single-unit dwelling residential uses; • Building heights stepped back from sensitive adjoining uses to maintain appropriate transitions in scale and to minimize impacts to privacy and solar access; • Landscaped off-street parking areas, loading areas, and service areas screened from adjacent residential areas to the degree feasible; or • Lighting shielded from view and directed downward to minimize impacts on adjacent residential uses.

LUP-4.7 Visual and Physical Character. Using development standards and design standards/guidelines, the City shall promote development patterns and streetscape improvements that transform the visual and physical character of automobile-oriented corridors to create a positive impact on the human and natural systems that interact with them.

LUP-4.10 Multi-Modal Access. The City shall require that new development provide bicycle, pedestrian, and transit access where appropriate to reduce the need for onsite parking and to improve the pedestrian experience within corridors and centers with street trees and landscaping.

LUP-7.5 Industrial Aesthetics. The City shall encourage the development and maintenance of well-designed industrial and light industrial properties and structures that meet adopted standards for visual quality and design, especially where interfacing with other uses.

PFS-3.13 Impacts to Environmentally Sensitive Lands. The City shall consider the impacts on environmentally sensitive areas and habitats when locating and designing municipal utilities.

PFS-3.14 Underground Utilities. The City shall require new development to underground utility lines wherever feasible and coordinate with electricity and telecommunications providers to underground existing overhead lines where feasible.

PFS-3.16 Stormwater Design in Private Development. The City shall require proponents of new development and redevelopment projects to submit drainage studies that adhere to City stormwater design requirements and incorporate measures, including "green infrastructure", Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, stormwater treatment, and, if applicable, trash capture devices, to prevent on- or off-site flooding and improve runoff water quality.

PFS-4.8 New Development. The City shall ensure that water supply capacity is in place prior to granting building permits for new development.

ERC 2.2.9 Small Public Places for New Development that requires the City to allow new development to provide small plazas, pocket parks, civic spaces, and other gathering places that are available to the public, particularly in infill areas, to help meet recreational demands.

ERC 2.2.20 Responsiveness to Community that requires the City to work with affected neighborhoods in the design of parks and recreational facilities to meet residents’ needs and interests.

ERC-2.9 Habitat Assessments. The City shall consider the potential impact on sensitive plants and wildlife for each project requiring discretionary approval. If site conditions are such that potential habitat for sensitive plant and/or wildlife species may be present, the City shall require habitat assessments, prepared by a qualified biologist, for sensitive plant and wildlife species. If the habitat assessment determines that suitable habitat for sensitive plant and/or wildlife species is present, then either: 1.

Protocol-level surveys shall be conducted (where survey protocol has been established by a resource agency), or, in the absence of established survey protocol, a focused survey shall be conducted consistent with industry-recognized best practices; or 2.

Suitable habitat and presence of the species shall be assumed to occur within all potential habitat locations identified on the project site. Survey Reports shall be prepared and submitted to the City and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (depending on the species) for further consultation and development of avoidance and/or mitigation measures consistent with state and federal law.

ERC-2.10 Agency Coordination. The City shall coordinate with State and Federal resource agencies (e.g., California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to protect areas containing rare or endangered species of plants and animals.

ERC-2.11 Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. The City shall continue to participate in and support the policies of the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan for the protection of biological resources in the Natomas Basin.

ERC-4.5 Construction Emissions. The City shall ensure that construction and grading activities minimize short-term impacts to air quality by employing appropriate measures and best practices. Refer to Basic Construction Emissions Control Practices (BMPs) recommended by the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD).

ERC-5.2 Reducing Storm Runoff. The City shall encourage project designs that minimize drainage concentrations, minimize impervious coverage, utilize pervious paving materials, utilize low impact development (LID) strategies, and utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce stormwater runoff.

ERC-10.2 Noise Source Control. The City should require noise impacts in new developments to be controlled at the noise source where feasible, as opposed to the receptor end, using techniques including but not limited to the following: • Site design, • Building orientation, • Building design, and • Hours of operation.

M-2.3 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as Metric. Consistent with state law, the City shall evaluate transportation California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impacts using vehicle miles traveled or other metrics as determined by the City, and shall not rely on automobile delay, as described by level of service or similar measures of vehicular delay as a measure of environmental significance. Local Transportation Analyses (LTA) shall continue to be required when necessary to aid in conditioning project entitlements for needed operational improvements.

M-1.5 Street Design Standards. The City shall maintain street design and operations standards that prioritize comfort and travel time for walking, bicycling, and transit, while managing vehicle speeds and traffic volumes, updating them as best practices evolve.

M-1.13 Walkability. The City shall design streets to prioritize walking by including design elements such as the following: • Grid networks that provide high levels of connectivity; • Closely spaced intersections; • Frequent and low-stress crossings; • Wide, unobstructed walkable sidewalks; • Separation from vehicle traffic; • Street trees that provide shading; and • Minimal curb cuts.

M-1.18 Bicycling Safety. When designing projects, the City shall prioritize designs that strengthen the protection of people bicycling such as improvements that increase visibility of bicyclists, increase bikeway widths, raise bikeways, design safer intersection crossings and turns, and separate bikeways from traffic wherever feasible.

M-1.19 Walking Safety. When designing projects, the City shall prioritize designs that encourage walking and improve walking safety best practice designs and considerations for efficiencies in walking.

M-1.40 Contributions from New Development. The City shall require new development to construct or pay a proportionate share of the cost of improvements based on mobility-related impacts of the new development.

HCR-1.1 Archaeological, Tribal, and Cultural Resources. The City shall continue to comply with federal and State regulations and best practices aimed at protecting and mitigating impacts to archaeological resources and the broader range of cultural resources as well as tribal cultural resources.

HCR-1.17 Evaluation of Archeological Resources. The City shall work in good faith with interested communities to evaluate proposed development sites for the presence of sub-surface historic, archaeological, and tribal cultural resources that may be present at the site. These efforts may include the following: • Consideration of existing reports and studies, • Consultation with Native American tribes as required by State law, • Appropriate site-specific investigative actions, and • Onsite monitoring during excavation if appropriate.

Airport South
Industrial Project

Plan for Services

Prepared for
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission

April 2024

Prepared by

1501 Sports Drive, Suite A, Sacramento, CA 95834

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services
Page i
April 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 1 I. PURPOSE STATEMENT .......................................................................................1 II. PLAN FOR SERVICES REQUIREMENTS...........................................................1 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................1 IV. AREAS OF SERVICE .............................................................................................6 V. SUMMARY .............................................................................................................6 B. AREAS OF SERVICE .............................................................................................................. 6 VI. WATER ...................................................................................................................6 VII. WASTEWATER....................................................................................................12 VIII. CIRCULATION AND ROADWAYS ...................................................................15 IX. ANIMAL CARE ....................................................................................................23 X. CODE ENFORCEMENT ......................................................................................24 XI. POLICE PROTECTION ........................................................................................25 XII. FIRE PROTECTION .............................................................................................28 XIII. SOLID WASTE .....................................................................................................32 XIV. STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL ................................................35 XV. PARKS AND RECREATION ...............................................................................44 XVI. LIBRARIES ...........................................................................................................47

Attachments
Attachment A Targeted Municipal Services Review
Attachment B Preliminary Water Study
Attachment C Level 1 Sewer Study
Attachment D Local Transportation Analysis
Attachment E Preliminary Drainage Study

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following discussions include a purpose statement, detail the Plan for Services requirements, and provide further details of the Plan for Services requirements, project description, areas of study, and an overall summary.

I. PURPOSE STATEMENT
The purpose of this Plan for Services report is to provide an analysis of the public services that would serve the 474.4-acre project site proposed for Annexation as part of the Airport South Industrial Project (proposed project) int o the City of Sacramento and Sacramento Area Sewer District (SacSewer) service area. This report will provide information to assist the Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission ( LAFCo) in determining whether public services provided to the project site can be reasonably provided constructed, maintained, and financed.

The Cortese‐Knox‐Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (see Government Code Sections 5600 through 57500) requires that a P lan for Services be prepared prior to “Changes of Organization or Reorganization.” The P lan for Services is a tool for Sacramento LAFCo to consider an update to the physical boundary and service area of a local ag ency and has been prepared to determine if services could adequately be extended to the project site without negatively affecting current service levels to existing recipients or rate structures.

II. PLAN FOR SERVICES REQUIREMENTS
The PFS requirements are based on the Cortese ‐Knox‐Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Section 56653, which stipulates the following:

(a) Whenever a local agency or school district submits a resolution of application for a change of organization or reorganization pursuant to this part, the local agency shall submit with the resolution of application a plan for providing services within the affected territory.
(b) The plan for providing services shall include all of the following information and any additional information required by the Commission or the Executive Officer:

(1) An enumeration and description of the services to be extended to the affected territory.
(2) The level and range of those services.
(3) An indication of when those services can feasibly be extended to the affected territory.
(4) An indication of any improvement or upgrading of structures, roads, sewer or water facilities, or other conditions the local agency would impose or require within the affected territory if the change of organization or reorganization is completed.
(5) Information with respect to how those services will be financed.

III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project location, setting, and surrounding land uses, as well as the project components are discussed further below.

PLAN FOR SERVICES
APRIL 2024

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Project Location, Setting, and Surrounding Land Uses
The 474.4-acre project site is located to the southeast of the intersection of Interstate 5 (I-5) and Power Line Road within the Natomas area of unincorporated Sacramento County, California (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). The site is identified by Sacramento County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 225-0020-010, -016, -017, -021, -022, -023, -024, -026, -027, -030, -032, -033, -034, and -035, as well as 225-0030-023, -024, -045, and -048. The County’s General Plan designates the site as Agricultural Cropland and the site is zoned Agricultural 80 (AG -80). The site is bound to the north by I-5 and to the east by the City of Sacramento City limits. Within the northern portion of the site, Bayou Way, a paved road consisting of two vehicle lanes, meanders in a west-to-east direction through the site. The project site currently consists of vacant, fallow agricultural land.

The site was historically used as hay fields, with intermittent rice fields from 1937 until at least 2020. Unnamed drainage canals run roughly north-south in both the western and eastern portions of the site. Numerous unimproved dirt roads provide access to the interior of the project site, which is subdivided into multiple agricultural plots.

Surrounding existing land uses include a Life Storage facility and the Westlake single -family residential subdivision to the east; the West Drainage Canal, vacant agricultural land, open space land, and the Paso Verde K-8 School to the south; undeveloped agricultural land to the west; the Sacramento International Airport to the northwest, across I -5; and the Metro Air Park, Amazon SMF-1 Fulfillment Center, and the u nder-construction Northlake (Greenbriar) subdivision to the north, across I-5.

Project Components
The proposed project would include the development of an industrial park within an approximately 353.5-acre portion of the project site, located immediately south of Bayou Way (see Figure 3).

The industrial park would include construction of up to 5,204,500 square feet (sf) of industrial uses on approximately 235.6 acres (Parcels 1 through 5) , as well as approximately 98,200 sf of retail/highway commercial uses on approximately 13.4 acres (Parcels 6A through 6C and 7A through 7C). The proposed project would also include five nonparticipating parcels, comprised of approximately 83 acres within the project site, that would receive first tier entitlements to facilitate future development of industrial uses of approximately 1,404,800 sf (Parcels 8 through 11, and California Department of Transportation [Caltrans] Remnant right -of-way (ROW) . Finally, the project site includes 37.9 acres of Caltrans I -5 fee title ROW, which would not be developed as part of the proposed project.

In addition to the development of the industrial park and Annexation of the nonparticipating parcels, the proposed project would include access and internal circulation improvements; water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage improvements; and construction of an off-site force main to convey wastewater generated from the proposed uses to the 48-inch SacSewer North Natomas interceptor line in East Commerce Way. The proposed project would require the following approvals:

• Sacramento LAFCo approval of a Sphere of Influence (SOI) Amendment to amend the City of Sacramento SOI; and Annexation of the project site into the City limits and SacSewer service area;
• City of Sacramento approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Prezoning, Planned Unit Development (PUD), Tentative Master Parcel Map, Development Agreement, Finance Plan, and Tax Exchange Agreement (with County).

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 1
Regional Vicinity Map

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 2
Project Site Boundaries

Legend
Annexation/SOI Amendment Area
Approved SMF Master Plan
Metro Air Park
Existing City Limit Boundary
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 3
Airport South Industrial Park – Preliminary Site Plan

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
IV. AREAS OF SERVICE
In accordance with the Cortese ‐Knox‐Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act, as well as in compliance with the Sacramento LAFCo Policies, Standards and Procedures Manual, the Plan for Services includes evaluation of the following categories of public services and utilities:

• Water;
• Wastewater;
• Circulation and Roadways;
• Animal Care;
• Code Enforcement;
• Police Protection;
• Fire Protection;
• Solid Waste;
• Storm Drainage and Flood Control;
• Parks and Recreation; and
• Libraries.

This report incorporates information contained in the Targeted Municipal Services Review (MSR) prepared for the proposed project by Wood Rodgers (see Attachment A of this Plan for Services),1 as well as information from the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) currently being prepared for the project by Raney Planning and Management, Inc.

V. SUMMARY
Responses have been provided for each of the foregoing infrastructure and public service areas, addressing the extension of service to the project site. This report provides Sacramento LAFCo a compilation of research and information that can be used for consideration of the proposed project. Based on the information contained herein, the following findings have been determined:

1. Services associated with all the foregoing areas of study identified above can be extended to serve the Airport South Industrial Project.

2. Service can be provided without interruption of existing service delivery levels and/or adverse impacts to the existing infrastructure system.

3. Adequate service can be provided by the City of Sacramento and SacSewer.

4. The project is not growth-inducing.

The proposed project would also be subject to applicable development impact fees to ensure that the project makes a fair -share contribution to funding future public service and utility upgrades and expansions that would be necessary for supporting the proposed project and benefit existing programs and facilities within the City of Sacramento.

B. AREAS OF SERVICE
The various p ublic service and utility providers that would serve the proposed project are discussed further below.

VI. WATER
The project site is not currently provided potable water service, as the site does not contain structures necessitating water demand and has only limited utility infrastructure. Upon annexation

1 Wood Rodgers. Airport South Industrial Targeted Municipal Services Review, Sacramento, Local Agency Formation Commission. January 2024.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
into the City of Sacramento, the City would be responsible for providing water to the project site.

The City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan2 contains guiding goals and policies related to water applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Public Facilities and Safety Element
Goal PFS-3 Efficient, high -quality utility infrastructure and services to meet the needs of residents and business throughout the city.

Policy PFS-3.1 Provision of Adequate Utilities. The City shall continue to provide reliable water, wastewater, and stormwater drainage utility services.

Policy PFS-3.2 Utility Sustainability. The City shall continue to improve the sustainability, resilience, and energy efficiency of its facilities, infrastructure, and operations consistent with the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan and the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045.

Policy PFS-3.3 Development Impacts. Through the development review process, including through development impact fees and offsite improvements constructed by new development, the City shall ensure that adequate public utilities and services are available to serve new development.

Policy PFS-3.4 Water Distribution System Management. The City shall maintain and periodically update the Water Distribution System Master Plan to guide rehabilitation, replacement, and
management of the potable water distribution system.

Policy PFS-3.5 Water Treatment Capacity and Infrastructure. The City shall plan, secure funding for, and procure sufficient water treatment capacity and infrastructure to meet projected maximum daily water demands. Options to explore may include the following:

• Expansion or rehabilitation of existing treatment plant infrastructure;
• Development and management of groundwater wells;
and
• Collaboration on regional water supply solutions.

Policy PFS-3.7 Rate and Fee Studies. The City shall periodically conduct rate and fee studies to ensure adequate funds are collected to maintain and expand utility systems as needed to support projected growth, implementing rate and fee increases as needed.

Policy PFS-3.10 Meet Projected Needs. The City shall foster the orderly and efficient expansion of facilities and infrastructure to adequately

2 City of Sacramento. Sacramento 2040 General Plan. Adopted February 27, 2024.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
meet projected needs, comply with current and future
regulations, and maintain public health, safety, and welfare.

Infrastructure and facility planning should discourage oversizing of infrastructure that could induce growth at the edges of the city beyond what is anticipated in the General Plan.

Policy PFS-3.12 Safe and Compatible Utility Design. The City shall ensure that public utility facilities are designed to be safe and compatible with adjacent uses.

Policy PFS-3.13 Impacts to Environmentally Sensitive Lands. The City shall consider the impacts on environmentally sensitive areas and habitats when locating and designing municipal utilities.

Goal PFS-4 A reliable supply of high-quality water that meets projected needs within the city’s place of use.

Policy PFS-4.4 Groundwater Infrastructure. The City shall maintain investment in groundwater infrastructure to provide for water supply reliability. Groundwater sustainability, cost
effectiveness, and the quality of the resource shall be factored into groundwater investments.

Policy PFS-4.5 Comprehensive Water Supply Planning. The City shall prepare and implement an Urban Water Management Plan,
updating it on a 5 -year cycle, to ensure a reliable, long -term water supply and service under projected future conditions.

Policy PFS-4.7 Water Supply During Emergencies. The City shall, to the extent feasible, maintain adequate water supply during
emergencies in accordance with the Water Master Plan and the Urban Water Management Plan.

Policy PFS-4.8 New Development. The City shall ensure that water supply capacity is in place prior to granting building permits for new development.

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
The City of Sacramento operates and maintains a 30 -inch water transmission main in Bayou Way that terminates near the eastern boundary of the project site. The transmission main was originally constructed to “wheel” the City’s water through the County of Sacramento to nearby development areas, including the Sacramento International Airport and Metro Air Park, both located north of the project site, across I-5.

From the City’s existing 30-inch water transmission main in Bayou Way at the northeast corner of the project site, a new 12-inch water line would be extended towards the south along the site’s eastern boundary within the proposed “A” Drive (see Figure 4). From the “A” Drive/Airport South Industrial Drive intersection within the project site, the new 12-inch line would then extend westward into the project site and form a looped water system within Airport South Industrial Drive and the site’s western and northern property lines.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 4
Proposed City/County Water System

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024

In total, the new on -site water infrastructure would connect to the City’s existing 30 -inch transmission main at three points. In addition, the new on -site water distribution system would connect to an existing eight -inch water line at the southeast corner of the project site at Lanfranco Circle, which serves the Westlake subdivision to the east of the site. As part of the proposed project, ownership and maintenance of the existing 30 -inch Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) transmission main along the no rthern boundary of Parcel 5 would be transferred to the City of Sacramento.

Installation of the new water supply infrastructure, including new fire water lines and hydrants, would occur either in existing road ROWs or in areas proposed for disturbance as part of development of the proposed project. The new water infrastructure would be designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable standards set forth in Section 27 of the City of Sacramento Standard Specifications , ensuring the new water lines are constructed in conformance with proper materials and sizing. All necessar y water conveyance infrastructure for the proposed project would be financed by the project applicant.

With respect to water supply to serve the proposed project and the City of Sacramento’s existing commitments, the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) includes a water service reliability assessment of the City’s projected supplies and demands during normal, single dry, and five consecutive dry years, which are presented in acre -feet per year (AFY). Under the various water year types, the total annual water supply sources available are compared to the total annual projected water use for the City’s water service area from 2025 to 2045 in five -year increments. Table 1 summarizes the supply and demand of each water year type provided in the 2020 UWMP. As shown therein, the City is projected to have a surplus of water supplies in all water year types through 2045. The demand anticipated to be generated by the proposed project is summarized in Table 2.

Table 1
Retail Water Supply and Demand During Normal, Single Dry, and Multiple Dry Years (AFY) in the Sacramento Service Area Hydrologic Condition 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Normal Year
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 108,432 114,809 121,187 127,564 133,942
Surplus 224,769 235,391 229,014 222,636 216,258
Single Dry Year
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 108,432 114,809 121,187 127,564 133,942
Surplus 224,769 235,391 229,014 222,636 216,258
Multiple Dry Year 1
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 108,432 114,809 121,187 127,564 133,942
Surplus 224,769 235,391 229,014 222,636 216,258
Multiple Dry Year 2
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 109,707 116,085 122,462 128,840 138,397
Surplus 223,493 234,116 227,738 221,360 211,803
(Continues on next page)
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Table 1
Retail Water Supply and Demand During Normal, Single Dry, and Multiple Dry Years (AFY) in the Sacramento Service Area Hydrologic Condition 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Multiple Dry Year 3
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 110,983 117,360 123,738 130,115 142,853
Surplus 222,218 232,840 226,463 220,085 207,347
Multiple Dry Year 4
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 112,258 118,636 125,013 131,391 147,308
Surplus 220,942 231,565 225,187 218,809 202,892
Multiple Dry Year 5
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 113,534 119,911 126,289 132,666 151,764
Surplus 219,667 230,289 223,912 217,534 198,436
Source: City of Sacramento 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, 2021.

Table 2
Proposed Project Water Demand Summary
Land Use Acres
Average Day Demand Unit Water Demand
AFY/Acre AFY
Commercial 13.4 2 26.8
Industrial 235.6 0.9 212.04
Nonparticipating 83 0.9 74.7
Total 332 -- 313.54
Source: Wood Rodgers, 2023.

Based on the data presented in Table 2, the total average daily demand for the proposed project would be 313.54 AFY. As shown in Table 1, the City is anticipated to have a surplus of water supplies in all hydrologic conditions through 2045, and the lowest projected surplus is expected to be 198,436 AFY in 2045 during the fifth consecutive year of drought.

Therefore, given the substantial amount of surplus projected for the City’s water supplies in all hydrologic conditions, the City’s existing water supplies would be able to accommodate the demand anticipated to be generated by the City’s existing commitments, as well as the water demand projected for the proposed project.

2. An Indication of Any Improvement or Upgrade of Facilities and Other Conditions the City Would Impose or Require Within the Affected Territory if the Reorganization is Completed
The City of Sacramento currently has the water supply and municipal infrastructure in place to provide potable water to the project site. Specific improvements necessary to provide water service have been detailed in the Airport South Industrial Preliminary Water Study prepared for the proposed project by Wood Rodgers (see Attachment B of this Plan for Services).3

3 Wood Rodgers. Airport South Industrial Preliminary Water Study, City of Sacramento, California. May 11, 2023.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024

3. An Indication of When the Services Can Feasibly be Extended to the Affected Territory
The project applicant would be responsible for the extension of infrastructure to provide water service to the project site, which includes the design and construction of the new internal water lines, as described above. The aforementioned improvements are not dependent upon other City - or developer -funded projects. The improvements can be constructed at any time to provide water service to the proposed project.

4. Information With Respect to How the Services Will be Financed Funding and financing information for the on-site water improvements is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section . All water facilities would be constructed by the developer. Utility infrastructure for new development in the City of Sacramento is funded through development impact fees established by the City of Sacramento Department of Utilities. The current fee schedule for calculating development impact fees can be found on the City of Sacramento website at:

https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/utilities/development-standards/development-impact- fees

VII. WASTEWATER
The project site is not currently provided sewer conveyance and treatment services, as the site does not contain structures and has only limited utility infrastructure. Upon annexation into the City, the project site would be provided wastewater collection and treatment services by SacSewer. It should be noted that prior to December 26, 2023, SacSewer was represented by two independent special districts, a previous iteration of SacSewer and the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District ( Regional San ). However, Sacramento LAFCo authorized a reorganization of the districts, dissolving the former SacSewer, annexing the district into Regional San, and subsequently naming the wastewater special district “Sacramento Area Sewer District.” An existing SacSewer trunk line is located within Greg Thatch Circle, to the east of State Route (SR) 99. From the existing trunk line, flows are conveyed to the 48-inch SacSewer North Natomas interceptor line, which connects with the trunk line to the southeast of the Club Center Drive/Hampton Falls Way intersection and proceeds south of Del Paso Road within East Commerce Way. In addition to the goals and policies listed above related to utilities in general, the City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to wastewater applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Public Facilities and Safety Element
Goal PFS-3 Efficient, high -quality utility infrastructure and services to meet the needs of residents and business throughout the city.

Policy PFS-3.6 Combined Sewer System Rehabilitation and Improvements. In keeping with its Combined Sewer System (CSS) Long Term Control Plan (LTCP), the City shall continue to rehabilitate and improve the CSS to decrease flooding, CSS outflows, and Combined System Overflows (CSOs). Through these improvements and requirement s for new development, the City shall also ensure that development in the CSS area does not result in increased flooding, CSS outflows or CSOs or reduce the overall percentage of flow routed to the Sacramento River Water Treatment Plant (SRWTP).

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
Sanitary sewer conveyance service within the project site would be provided through a gravity system. New eight -inch sewer lines would be installed within the project site’s parcels, which would convey flows to a new sewer line in Airport South Industrial Drive ranging in diameter between 12 and 18 inches (see Figure 5). From the sewer line in Airport South Industrial Drive, flows would be directed to a new pump station sited within the proposed Lot F. From the new pump station, flows would be conveyed to the existing SacSewer North Natomas interceptor line by way of a force main that would extend from the northeast corner of the site and proceed towards the south within Bayou Way and El Centro Road.

At the El Centro Road/Del Paso Road intersection, the off-site force main would connect to the North Natomas interceptor line through one of three optional alignments. Each alignment option would require the force main to proceed east. Option 1 would include installation of the force main within a City highway buffer parallel with the westerly side of I-5.

About 0.5-mile south of Del Paso Road, the force main would cross under I -5 within City ROW and then discharge into the North Natomas interceptor line within East Commerce Way. Options 2 and 3 would route the force main either north or south of the I -5 on/off ramps, cross under I-5, and then proceed within Del Paso Road towards East Commerce Way in existing ROW and/or previously disturbed areas. T he new sewer infrastructure would be designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable standards set forth in the SacSewer Standards and Specifications, ensuring the new sewer lines and pump station are constructed in conformance with proper materials and sizing. All necessary sewer conveyance infrastructure for the proposed project would be financed by the project applicant.

According to the Airport South Industrial Level 1 Sewer Study (Sewer Study) prepared for the proposed project by Wood Rodgers (see Attachment C of this Plan for Services),4 the sewer equivalent single-family dwelling units (ESD) that make up the sewer demand for the proposed project include approximately 81 ESDs of commercial units, 1,870 industrial (warehouse) ESDs, 516 detention basin ESDs, 152 ESDs of roadway/right-of-way (ROW), pump stations and buffer spaces . Based on the land use a creages proposed as part of the project and the aforementioned ESDs, the combined average dry -weather flow (ADWF) and peak wet -weather flow (PWWF) demand is expected to be 0.81 mgd and

2.09 mgd, re spectively. The sewer pump station that w ould serve the proposed project would be developed in a single phase to meet the ultimate ADWF and PWWF. All sewer facilities would be permanent.

Collected wastewater is discharged into SacSewer’s interceptor system and treated at the district’s Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SRWTP) located in South Sacramento County. Wastewater is treated to a tertiary standard and discharged into the Sacramento River; however, some effluent is used by the City of Elk Grove for landscape irrigation. The SRWTP is permitted to treat ADWF of 181 mgd. Since the opening of the SRWTP, system improvements have been made to accommodate regional growth and to add capacity to SacSewer’s interceptor system.

4 Wood Rodgers. Airport South Industrial Level 1 Sewer Study. November 2022.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 5
Schematic Sewer System Layout

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
In 2014, the SRWTP’s ADWF was approximately 141 mgd. Although future growth in the SacSewer service area will increase demands for wastewater service and u se the remaining capacity of the SRWTP, regional water conservation efforts have resulted in a reduction in water use, which has in turn, increased the available capacity at the SRWTP.

For instance, SacSewer anticipates per capita water consumption to decline through the continued installation of water meters and water conservation measures. As such, a substantial amount of additional water conservation is expected throughout SacSewer’s service area, and the wastewater treatment provider expects the existing 181 mgd ADWF capacity to be sufficient through 2050. Accordingly, the SRWTP would maintain sufficient capacity to treat wastewater flows generated by the proposed project, in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.

2. An Indication of Any Improvement or Upgrade of Facilities and Other Conditions the City Would Impose or Require Within the Affected Territory if the Reorganization is Completed
SacSewer currently has the wastewater treatment capacity and municipal infrastructure in place to provide wastewater conveyance and treatment service s to the project site.

Specific improvements necessary to provide wastewater service have been detailed in the Sewer Study prepared for the proposed project by Wood Rodgers.

3. An Indication of When the Services Can Feasibly be Extended to the Affected Territory
The project applicant would be responsible for the extension of infrastructure to provide wastewater conveyance and treatment services to the project site, which includes the design and construction of the new internal sewer lines and off-site force main alignment, as described above. The aforementioned improvements are not dependent upon other City- or developer-funded projects. The improvements can be constructed at any time to provide wastewater conveyance and treatment services to the proposed project.

4. Information With Respect to How the Services Will be Financed Funding and financing information for the on-site sewer lines and off -site force main alignment is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section. All wastewater facilities would be constructed by the developer. As previously discussed, utility infrastructure for new development in the City of Sacramento is funded through development impact fees established by the City of Sacramento Department of Utilities.

VIII. CIRCULATION AND ROADWAYS
The following are the existing roadways located within the project vicinity:

• Interstate 5: I-5 is a north-south freeway facility serving local and interregional traffic within the Sacramento region. I-5 primarily links South Sacramento, the Central Business District in Downtown Sacramento, Natomas, and the Sacramento International Airport. I-5 is also used as a primary route for long -distance traffic, including truck traffic. I -5 is generally about two to four lanes in each direction in the project vicinity. • Power Line Road: Power Line Road is a north-south minor collector, perpendicular to I-5, located along the west side of the project site. To the north, the roadway intersects with Bayou Way and passes over I-5. To the south, Power Line Road intersects with Del Paso Road and ends at Garden Highway. Power Line Road has one lane in each direction with narrow, unpaved shoulders.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
• Bayou Way: Bayou Way is an east -west local rural road located on the north side of the project site. To the west, the roadway intersects with Power Line Road. To the east, Bayou Way intersects with Metro Air Parkway and continues to the Westlake neighborhood, where the roadway becomes El Centro Road. Bayou Way has one lane in each direction.

East of the project site, El Centro Road is separated by a painted median and has painted bike lanes in both directions.
• Del Paso Road: Del Paso Road is an east-west minor arterial located approximately 0.5- mile south of the project site. To the west, the roadway intersects with Power Line Road.

To the east, Del Paso Road intersects Hovnanian Drive and bisects the suburban Westlake and Sundance Lake neighborhoods. To the east, the roadway is a major arterial and has ramps connected to I-5. The segment of the roadway directly to the south of the project site has one lane in each direction. To the east, the roadway expands to t hree lanes in each direction with additional left-turn lanes and a raised median. • El Centro Road: El Centro Road is a north -south arterial located approximately 0.5 -mile east of the project site. El Centro Road is a planned four-lane minor arterial. To the north, the roadway becomes a two -lane facility to Bayou Way. To the south, the roadway intersects with Del Paso Road and runs alongside the suburban neighborhoods of Westlake and Sundance Lake. North of Del Paso Road, the roadway has two southbound lanes, one northbound lane, and a raised median with left-turn lanes. To the south of Del Paso Road, the roadway has two lanes in each direction with a raised median. • Metro Air Parkway : Metro Air Parkway is a north -south arterial perpendicular to I -5 that bisects the project site. Metro Air Parkway intersects Bayou Way to the south, passes over I-5, and continues north to intersect with West Elkhorn Boulevard. Within the project area, Metro Air Parkway currently has one lane per direction and is being widened to have two lanes in each direction. In the future, the roadway is anticipated to be widened to three lanes in each direction. Metro Air Parkway is considered a thoroughfare within the County. • Elkhorn Boulevard: Elkhorn Boulevard is an east-west major arterial located north of the project site. To the east, Elkhorn Boulevard connects with SR 99. To the west, Elkhorn Boulevard connects with Power Line Road. Elkhorn Boulevard is currently one lane per direction except in front of Northlake, where the roadway has three eastbound lanes and two westbound lanes. Elkhorn Boulevard is anticipated to be widened as a six-lane major arterial/thoroughfare.

The pedestrian system in the project site vicinity consists of sidewalks along Del Paso Road and El Centro Road as the roadways pass through the Sundance Lake and Westlake neighborhoods, as well as an internal trail system within the neighborhoods. In addition, a sidewalk is located along Bayou Way just east of the project site, associated with the existing self -storage facility.

Pedestrian facilities are not currently located along the project site frontage, as the location is currently undeveloped.

The bicycle system in the site vicinity consists of infrastructure around the Westlake and Sundance Lake neighborhoods. The bicycle system consists of a Class I bike path and Class II bike lanes to the south and east of the project site.

The project area is served by the local Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) bus service (Routes 13 and 142) as well as North Natomas Jibe (Lines 171 and 174). SacRT Bus Route 13 operates along Del Paso Road, south of the project site, and SacRT Bus Route 142, which is a peak-only line, operates along I-5 and stops north of the project site. North Natomas Jibe Line 171 passes along the project site on Callison Drive, and North Natomas Jibe Line 174 operates on Del Paso Road southeast of the project site. How ever, Jibe Line 174 does not include any stops in the Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
vicinity of the site. Jibe routes have traditionally run from Natomas to Downtown Sacramento during the morning peak hour and from Downtown Sacramento to Natomas during the afternoon peak hour. However, i t should be noted that, due to continued low ridership caused by the COVID19 pandemic, the North Natomas Jibe has suspended all service. It should also be noted that while the project site is not currently served by SacRT Light Rail Transit (LRT), as outlined in the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (S ACOG) Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS), a future SacRT LRT Green Line station is planned within 0.5-mile of the project boundary at Elkhorn Blvd and Power Line Road.

The City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to circulation and roadways applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Mobility Element
Goal M-1 An equitable, sustainable multimodal system that provides a range of viable and healthy travel choices for users of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities.

Policy M-1.1 Street Classification System. The City shall maintain a street classification system that considers the role of streets as corridors for movement but prioritizes a context -sensitive Complete Streets concept that enables connected, comfortable, and convenient travel for those walking, rolling, and taking transit.

Policy M-1.2 User Prioritization. The City shall prioritize mobility, comfort, health, safety, and convenience for those walking, followed by those bicycling and riding transit, ahead of design and operations for those driving.

Policy M-1.5 Street Design Standards. The City shall maintain street design and operations standards that prioritize comfort and travel time for walking, bicycling, and transit, while managing vehicle speeds and traffic volumes, updating them as best practices evolve.

Policy M-1.6 Transit Integration. Wherever feasible, the City shall design buildings, the public realm, streets, and pedestrian access to integrate transit into existing neighborhoods and proposed developments and destinations such as schools, employment centers, commercial centers, major attractions, and public walking spaces to improve access for users by transit.

Policy M-1.11 Increase Bicycling and Walking. The City shall strive to increase bicycling and walking citywide so that it can meet its equity, reduced vehicle miles traveled, and sustainability goals.

Policy M-1.12 Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station Access Improvements.

Through the development approval process and public and private investments, the City shall foster additional walking and bicycling connections to light rail stations and strengthen existing connections to enhance first/last-mile connectivity and make it easier to travel between the station and surrounding Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
neighborhoods and destinations. As feasible, connections should include pedestrian-level streetlighting and tree shading.

Policy M-1.13 Walkability. The City shall design streets to prioritize walking by including design elements such as the following:

• Grid networks that provide high levels of connectivity; • Closely spaced intersections;
• Frequent and low-stress crossings;
• Wide, unobstructed walkable sidewalks;
• Separation from vehicle traffic;
• Street trees that provide shading; and
• Minimal curb cuts.

Policy M-1.16 Barrier Removal. The City shall remove barriers to walking, where feasible, and work with utility companies to remove barriers to allow people of all abilities to move with comfort and convenience throughout the city, including through the
following:

• Provision of curb ramps, crosswalks, and overpasses;
• Relocation of infrastructure or street furniture that impedes travel pathways;
• Reducing or consolidating driveways and curb cuts;
• Providing long and short -term bicycle and scooter
parking to minimize sidewalk obstructions; and
• Creation of additional walking entrances to important destinations like schools, parks, and commercial areas.

Policy M-1.21 Extension of Transit Service. The City shall coordinate with the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) to plan for the extension of frequent transit service and other related transit improvements that are comfortable, convenient, and
interconnected from the Greater Land Park, N orth Natomas, Pocket/Greenhaven, South Area, and South Natomas
Community Plan Areas to areas with concentrated employment.

This may include frequent bus service provided by SacRT as an interim solution along routes ultimately planned for light rail service.

Policy M-1.39 Maintain the Street System. The City shall maintain streets and shared-use paths using a pavement management system and maintenance program for public streets and shared -use paths throughout the city based on available funding.

Policy M-1.40 Contributions from New Development. The City shall require new development to construct or pay a proportionate share of the cost of improvements based on mobility -related impacts of the new development.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Goal M-2 Reduced reliance on single-occupant vehicles.

Policy M-2.1 Transportation Demand Management (TDM). The City should promote the greater use of Transportation Demand Management strategies by employers and residents to reduce dependence on single-occupancy vehicles with the target that 17 percent of all trips are made by transit and active
transportation modes by 2030 and 23 percent of all trips are made by transit and active transportation modes by 2045.

Policy M-2.2 Wider Participation. The City should encourage Transportation Management Associations (TMAs), public
agencies, major employers, and school districts to expand and increase participation in programs that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and increase regional average vehicle
occupancy. When designing rewards and incentives, prioritize opportunities to support local businesses.

Policy M-2.3 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as Metric. Consistent with state law, the City shall evaluate transportation California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impacts using vehicle miles traveled or other metrics as determined by the City, and shall not rely on automobile delay, as described by level of service or similar measures of vehicular delay as a measure of
environmental significance. Local Transportation Analyses (LTA) shall continue to be required when necessary to aid in conditioning project entitlements for needed operational improvements.

Policy M-2.4 Shared Shuttles. The City shall encourage employers to partner with the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) and local Transportation Management Associations (TMAs) to connect employment areas with the multimodal transit stations, light rail stations, and other ma jor destinations, and to offer employees training and incentives for use of shuttles.

Goal M-3 Streets designed and maintained as places that contribute to quality of life.

Policy M-3.3 Traffic. The City shall support planning and managing traffic from the perspective of the adjacent uses, using traffic management and traffic calming techniques.

Goal M-4 A safer transportation system.

Policy M-4.1 Application of Safety. The City shall design, plan, and operate streets using complete streets principles to ensure the safety and mobility of all users.

Policy M-4.7 Integrated Goods Movement. The City shall work to ensure that the goods movement sector is integrated with the rest of Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
the transportation system in such a way that does not endanger the health and safety of residents and other roadway users.

Goal M-5 Connections to the regional transportation network that facilitates the movement of people and goods.

Policy M-5.6 Goods Movement Facilities. The City shall support improvements to regional goods movement facilities that facilitate local economic development and limit environmental impacts, including investments in technology, such as
blockchain, that improve tracking and coordination at intermodal freight facilities.

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
Access to the project site would be provided from the north by Metro Air Parkway, which would extend southward into the project site and connect to the proposed Airport South Industrial Drive , providing a direct connection for trucks . The proposed project would include abandonment of the existing South Bayou Way within the project site boundaries.

Concurrent with abandonment, an access easement would be dedicated over the eastern segment of South Bayou Way. In addition, “A” Drive would extend to the north from Airport South Industrial Drive along a portion of the eastern site boundary and connect to a new roundabout at the northeastern corner of the project site. The roundabout is anticipated to have signage and be configured to prohibit off -site truck traffic from the project site, east and south along Bayou Way/El Centro Road to Del Paso Road.

With respect to new vehicle trips generated b y the proposed project, as traffic volumes increase, vehicle queues typically also increase at most intersections. A summary of freeway ramp termini intersection queueing analyses under Baseline and Baseline with Project conditions is presented in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. As noted in the tables, red bolded text indicates an operational deficiency either caused by or exacerbated by the project. However, as shown in Table 4, while operational deficiencies exist at the Metro Air Parkway and I -5 northbound ramps at the northbound left lane and the Metro Air Parkway and I-5 southbound ramps at the southbound left lane during both the AM and PM peak hour under the Baseline with Project condition, such deficiencies would not be caused by or exacerbated by the proposed project.

Table 3
Queuing at Freeway Ramp Termini During Peak Hours —
Baseline Condition
Intersection /
Analysis Scenario Movement
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)

1. Airport Blvd and I-5
northbound ramps WBL 1,350 20 1,350 20

2. Airport Blvd and I-5
southbound ramps EBL/EBR 1,375 60 1,375 60
(Continues on next page)
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Table 3
Queuing at Freeway Ramp Termini During Peak Hours —
Baseline Condition
Intersection /
Analysis Scenario Movement
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)

3. Metro Air Parkway
and I-5 northbound
ramps
WBL/WBT 1,575 35 1,575 25
WBR 160 145 160 105
NBL 160 60 160 20

4. Metro Air Parkway
and I-5 southbound
ramps
EBL/EBR 1,600 115 1,600 50
SBR 130 90 130 90

9. Del Paso Road and
I-5 northbound ramps
NBL 1,270 295 1,270 295
NBR 1,270 320 1,270 380

10. Del Paso Road and
I-5 southbound ramps
SBL 1,100 105 1,100 125
SBR 250 120 250 80

13. West Elkhorn
Boulevard and SR 99
northbound ramps
NBL 1,525 145 1,525 85

14. West Elkhorn
Boulevard and SR 99
southbound ramps
SBL 400 85 400 165
SBR 1,480 115 1,480 85
Note: EB = eastbound; EBL = eastbound left; EBR = eastbound right; ft = feet; NB = northbound; NBL = northbound left; NBR = northbound right; SB = southbound; SBL = southbound left; SBR = southbound right; WB = westbound; WBL = westbound left; WBR = westbound right

Black bolded results indicate an operational deficiency. Red bolded results indicate an operational deficiency either caused by or exacerbated by the project. Values rounded up to the nearest multiple of five.

Source: DKS, 2023.

Table 4
Queuing at Freeway Ramp Termini During Peak Hours —
Baseline Plus Project Condition
Intersection /
Analysis Scenario Movement
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)

1. Airport Blvd and I-5
northbound ramps WBL 1,350 20 1,350 20

2. Airport Blvd and I-5
southbound ramps EBL/EBR 1,375 75 1,375 60

3. Metro Air Parkway
and I-5 northbound
ramps
WBL 350 270 350 175
WBT/WBR 1,575 180 1,575 180
NBL 100 150 100 145

4. Metro Air Parkway
and I-5 southbound
ramps
NBT 875 220 875 245
SBT 700 330 700 305
(Continues on next page)
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Table 4
Queuing at Freeway Ramp Termini During Peak Hours —
Baseline Plus Project Condition
Intersection /
Analysis Scenario Movement
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)

9. Del Paso Road and
I-5 northbound ramps

4. Metro Air Parkway
and I-5 southbound
ramps
SBR 650 100 650 95
EBL 1,600 135 1,600 115

10. Del Paso Road and
I-5 southbound ramps
EBR 170 95 170 45
NBL 300 200 300 220

13. West Elkhorn
Boulevard and SR 99
northbound ramps
NBT 470 205 470 240

14. West Elkhorn
Boulevard and SR 99
southbound ramps
SBT 840 405 840 260
SBR 130 255 130 185
Notes: EB = eastbound; EBL = eastbound left; EBR = eastbound right; ft = feet; NB = northbound; NBL = northbound left; NBR = northbound right; SB = southbound; SBL = southbound left; SBR = southbound right; WB = westbound; WBL = westbound left; WBR = westbound right

Black bolded results indicate an operational deficiency. Red bolded results indicate an operational deficiency either caused by or exacerbated by the project. Values rounded up to the nearest multiple of five.

Source: DKS, 2023.

Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are not currently located along the project site frontage, as the location is currently undeveloped. As such, the proposed project would not adversely affect existing pedestrian or bicycle facilities. In addition, the proposed project would be required through Mitigation Measure 4.12 -2 of the EIR to construct pedestrian and bicycle facilities along the project site’s frontage in accordance with applicable City standards; Class IV separated bicycle facil ities within the proposed cross -section to provide separation between cyclists and heavy truck traffic; connection of the bicycle network to the existing and planned City and County bikeway system, including, but not limited to, Bayou Way at the northeast corner of the site, the Class I bikeway at the southeast corner of the site, and Metro Air Parkway north of I -5; and the off-street Class IV cycle track shown on the eastern side of the site in the City of Sacramento Bikeway Master Plan. With respect to transit facilities, t he proposed project would not include features that would conflict with existing or planned transit services.

2. Roadway Level of Service Criteria
Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions at an intersection or road segment. The level of service generally describes the conditions in terms of average delay per vehicle. Six levels of service are defined and given letter designations from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services