Sacramento City Council
October 21, 2025

><<D=8C84B 8= C74 )%
A468>= C> 34C4A<8=4 85 C74 ?A>942C F8;; 4G2443 )%
RB 4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC7 5>A420BC 5>A C74
BC01;8B743 ><<D=8C84B


338C8>=0;;H C74 A4E8B43
( <DBC 0;B> ?A>E834
34<>6A0?782 0=3 64>6A0?782 8=5>A<0C8>= >= C74 ;>20C8>= >5 @D0;85843 F>A:4AB C> 58;; C74B4 ?>B8C8>=B 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 0=0;HB8B
*74 ?A>942C8>=B 5>A 2D<D;0C8E4 0=0;HB8B <DBC 14 @D0=C85843 0=3 38B2;>B43C> C74 ?D1;82 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 034@D0C4 0=3 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 0=0;HB8B G2;D38=6 0 @D0=C85843 0=0;HB8B >5 C74
1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB



4=4A0; &;0= 0=3 C74 ?A>942CRB 8<?02C C> C7>B4 ?A>942C8>=B 3>4B =>C 2><?;H F8C7 
'RB A4@D8A4<4=C B 5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D <4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4 
' K


0=3 &(

1

=2>A?>A0C8>= 1H A454A4=24 
' K



5 8B =>C 0??A>?A80C4 0B 0 @D0=C85843 0=0;HB8B >5 C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB



4=4A0; &;0= 0=3 C74 ?A>942CRB 8<?02C C> C7>B4 ?A>942C8>=B 2>=CA81DC4 38A42C;H C> 0=0;HB8B >5 C74 ?A>1;4< 0C 70=3 *74

(

( ?A42;D34B <40=8=65D; 3428B8>= <0:8=6 0=3
>A ?D1;82 2><<4=C
8= 8CB 4G2;DB8>= >5 C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB



4=4A0; &;0=B8=24 8C 8B DC8;8I43 0B
9DBC85820C8>= C> BD??>AC 0 ;4BB C70= B86=85820=C 58=38=6  A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34
0 @D0=C85843 0=0;HB8B >5 C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB



4=4A0; &;0= 0=3 C74 ?A>942CRB
8<?02C C> C7>B4 ?A>942C8>=B 5>A A4E84F 0=0;HB8B 0=3 2><<4=C 1H C74 ?D1;82 0=3 3428B8>= <0:4AB 8= >A34A C> 2><?;H F8C7 
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3> 2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4 
' K


0=3 &(

1
$>C01;H *01;4

A>FC7 &A>942C8>=B 5>A )02A0<4=C> 



4=4A0; &;0= F8C78= C74
4=4A0;
&;0=
( BC0C4B C70C C74 8CH F8;; 033 

9>1B 5A><





*01;4
 8CHF834 D8;3>DC
11H >=24?C A40 BC0C4B C70C C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= F8;; 70E4
 =3DBCA80;
4<?;>H44B 0C 1D8;3>DC *01;4
 8CHF834 D8;3>DC )D<<0AH BC0C4B C70C =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H<4=C 8= C74 4=C8A4 8CH F8;; 8=2A40B4 1H 
9>1B 0C 1D8;3>DC

)8=24 C74 ?A>942C B8C4 8B =>C ;>20C43 F8C78= C74 8=2>A?>A0C43 8CH ;8<8CB >A 8CB )?74A4 >5 =5;D4=24 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C C74A45>A4 A4?A4B4=CB 0= 8=2A40B4 >5 

=4F 4<?;>H44B 01>E4 C74B4 ?A>942C8>=B

$>C01;H C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942CRB 

4<?;>H44B F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 @D0=C8CH >5 =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H44B 0=C828?0C43 5>A C74 4=C8A4CH 5>5 C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= 1H

 8C F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 8CH 1H  0=3 8=2A40B4 C>C0; 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 28CH 1H 


*74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H 0=0;HB8B A460A38=6 C74 8CH
4=4A0; &;0= 1D8;3>DC B24=0A8>
8=2;D38=6 0;; 2D<D;0C8E4 34E4;>?<4=C 2>=BCAD2C43 B8=24 03>?C8>= 0??A>E43 ?A>942CB =>C H4C 2>=BCAD2C43 0=3 O?A>942CB 8= C74 ?8?4;8=4 P

 A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 C78B 0=0;HB8B
8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 034@D0C4 0=3 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0;

0=0;HB8B 0=3 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 5>5 B86=85820=24 0B C74 ?A>942C F8;; 8=3D24 6A>FC7 8= C74 0A40 0=3 4G2443B C74 4=4A0; &;0= 1D8;3>DC
B24=0A8> 5>A C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43+B4 34B86=0C8>= C70C F0B 34E4;>?43 5>A C74 ?DA?>B4 5>5  ,8847;;;'-8=3*7%'6%1)283+3:'328)28(%14368%0'(( 0%22-2+2:-6321)28%014%'8
)43687
+49%2('%%4!%'6%1)283


63.)'8
 
 4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

0E>838=6 >A <8C860C8=6 0= 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 45542C A43D24 ,#*

0=3 8<?A>E4 08A @D0;8CH 0E80
2><?02C <8G43DB4 34E4;>?<4=C
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

( 28C4B 
'
D834;8=4B )42C8>=


 5 C70C BC0C4B O*74 0;C4A=0C8E4B B70;; 14 ;8<8C43
C> >=4B C70C F>D;3 0E>83 >A BD1BC0=C80;;H ;4BB4= 0=H >5 C74 B86=85820=C 45542CB >5 C74 ?A>942C %5 C7>B4 0;C4A=0C8E4B C74
( =443 4G0<8=4 8= 34C08; >=;H C74 >=4B C70C C74 ;403 064=2H 34C4A<8=43 2>D;3 540B81;H 0CC08= <>BC >5 C74 10B82 >1942C8E4B >5 C74 ?A>942C P

*74 0;C4A=0C8E4B 0=0;HI43 8= C74 
( 3> =>C 0E>83 >A BD1BC0=C80;;H ;4BB4= C74 B86=85820=C 45542CB >5 C74 ?A >?>B43 ?A>942C

*74 0;C4A=0C8E4 ?A>942CB 0=0;HI43 02784E4 >=;H <8=>A A43D2C8>=B C> B86=85820=C 45542CB F7827 C74  (
270A02C4A8I4B 0B O54F4AP C70= C74 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 8<?02CB 1DC 8<?02CB F>D;3 A4<08= B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 =>=4C74;4BB ;C4A=0C8E4 ?A>942C 8<?02CB A 4<08=8=6 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 0A4 =>C OBD1BC0=C80;;H ;4 BBP C70= C74 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8 301;4 8<?02CB >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C

*74 
(

( 70B =>C 2><?;843 F8C7 
'
D834;8=4B )42C8>=


 


A4E8B43
( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 0= 0;C4A=0C8E4B 0=0;HB8B C70C 8=2;D34B 0 A40B>=01;4 A0=64 >5 0;C4A=0C8E4B C70C 2><?;84B F8C7 
'
D834;8=4B )42C8>=


  8= >A34A C> 5>BC4A 8=5>A<43
3428B8>= <0:8=6 *78B <DBC 8=2;D34 0;C4A=0C8E4B C70C 0E>83 >A BD1BC0=C80 ;;H ;4BB4= B86=85820=C 45542CB >5 C74 ?A>942C
,*&!.!-,%+.%*)
*74
( 3>4B =>C 8=2;D34 0 5;>>A ?;0= 34C08;43 B8C4 ?;0= >A 0 2>=24?CD0; 6A038=6 ?;0=

*74 10B82 2><?>=4=CB >5 0 &;0==8=6 ??;820C8>= 8=2;D34 0 34C08;43 B8C4 ?;0= 5;>>A ?;0= 2>=24?CD0; 6A038=6 ?;0= FA8CC4= =0AA0C8E4 0=3 34C08;43 4;4E0C8>=B

*74 B8C4 ?;0= ?A>E8343 8= 86DA4  )8C4 &;0= 70B
144= 438C43 5>A ?D1;82 A4E84F C> A4<>E4 <40=8=65D; 8=5>A<0C8>= 86DA4  4G2;D34B 0;; >5 C74
:4H =>C4B ;464=3 0=3 8<?>AC0=C B8C430C0 BD27 0B ?0A:8=6 0=3 B8C4 2>E4A064 $>C01;H 4E4= C7>D67 C74
G42DC8E4 )D<<0AH BC0C4B C70C C74
( ?A>E834B 0 ?A>942CB?428582 0=0;HB8B ?DABD0=C C> 
'

D834;8=4B )42C8>=


5>A 0;; 0A40B 4G24?C C74 =>=?0AC828?0C8=6 ?0A24;B
86DA4  )8C4 &;0=
3>4B =>C 8=2;D34 0=H DB45D; 8=5>A<0C8>= C70C F>D;3 14 DC8;8I43 5>A 0=0;HB8B BD27 0B C74 ;>20C8>= >5 C74 CAD2:

CA08;4A ;>038=6 3>2:B ?0BB4=64A 20A ?0A:8=6 B?024B 0=3 CAD2:

CA08;4A ?0A:8=6 B?024B

;;
>5 C74B4 10B82 8C4<B 0A4 =424BB0AH C> 2>=3D2C 0=H CH?4 >5 0=0;HB8B 0=3 C74 ( 8B 8=034@D0C4 0B 0=
8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=C 0B 8C 8B =>C ?>BB81;4 C> 0B24AC08= 0=H <40=8=65D; 0=0;HB8B 10B43 D?>= C74 8=5>A<0C8>= ?A>E8343
*74A4 0A4 0;B> => 0A278C42CDA0; 1D8;38=6 4;4E0C8>=B ?A>E8343

*74 A4=34A8=6B 8=2;D343 8= 86DA4

 C7A>D67 
 3> =>C ?A>E834 C74 74867C >5 C74 1D8;38=6B ?08=C 2>;>AB >A 1D8;38=6 <0C4A80;B

*74
( 70B 0;B> 4G2;D343 0 6A038=6 ?;0= 5A>< ?D1;82 A4E84F *74 ( BC0C4B C70C O??A>G8<0C4;H



2D182 H0A3B >5 B>8; F>D;3 14 8<?>AC43 3DA8=6 6A038=6P H4C C74A4 8B => <4C7>3 5>A C74 ?D1;82 C> E4A85H C78B 2;08< &A>E838=6 C74 6A038=6 ?;0= 0=3 40AC7F>A: @D0=C8CH =>C4B 8B E8C0; 0B C78B 38A42C;H 8=5>A<B C74 @D0=C8CH >5 =424BB0AH CAD2: 70D;8=6 CA8?B 3D4 C> B>8;8<?>AC 4G?>AC 3DA8=6 C74
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

25 6A038=6
?70B4
>5
2>=BCAD2C8>=


A4E8B43

(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43
C>
8=2;D34
F7>;;H
022DA0C4
0=3

D=438C43
34C08;43
5;>>A
?;0=
6A038=6
?;0=
B8C4
?;0=
0=3
?A>942C
=0AA0C8E4
5>A
?D1;82
A4E84F

DAC74A
C74

(
8B
8=034@D0C4
0B
8C
3>4B
=>C
?A>E834
34C08;43
8=5>A<0C8>=
A460A38=6
C74
A4@D4BCB
0BB>280C43
F8C7
4027
>5
C74
38B2A4C8>=0AH
02C8>=B


>A
4G0<?;4 
C74

(
1A845;H
;8BCB
0
54F
>5
C74

A4@D4BCB
0BB>280C43
F8C7
C74
#

0=3

&+
1DC
70B
4G2;D343
C 74
&+
)274<0C82
&;0=
0=3
&+

D834;8=4B
5A><
?D1;82
A4E84F
*74
?A>942C
0;B>
A4@D8A4B
38B2A4C8>=0AH
0??A>E0;
>5
0
*4=C0C8E4
#0BC4A
&0A24;
#0?
4E4;>?<4=C
6A44<4=C

8=0=24
&;0=
0=3
&A>?4ACH
*0G

G270=64

6A44<4=C
=>=4
>5
F7827
0A4
8=2;D343
5>A
?D1;82
A4E84F
0B
?0AC
>5
C74
(
*78B
3>4B
=>C
2><?;H

F8C7

'RB
A4@D8A4<4=CB
5>A
034@D0C4
8=5>A<0C8>=0;
3>2D<4=CB
0=3
<40=8=65D;
38B2;>BDA4

'
K



0=3

1

=2>A?>A0C8>=
1H
A454A4=24

'
K




5
8B
=>C
0??A>?A80C4

0B
C74
2><?;4C4
&+
)274<0C82
&;0=
&+

D834;8=4B
*4=C0C8E4
# 0BC4A
&0A24;
#0?

4E4;>?<4=C
6A44<4=C

8=0=24
&;0=
0=3
&A>?4ACH
*0G

G270=64
6A44<4=C
2>=CA81DC4

38A42C;H
C>
0=0;HB8B
>5
C74
?A>1;4<
0C
70=3


A4E8B43
(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43
C>
8=2;D34
C74
2><?;4C4

&+
)274<0C82
&;0=
&+

D834;8=4B
*4=C0C8E4
#0BC4A
&0A24;
#0? 
4E4;>?<4=C
6A44<4=C

8=0=24
&;0=
0=3
&A>?4ACH
*0G

G270=64
6A44<4=C
5>A
A4E84F
0 =0;HB8B
0=3
2><<4=C
1H
C74
?D1;82
0=3
3428B8>=
<0:4AB
8=
>A34A
C>
2><?;H
F8C7
 'RB
A4@D8A4<4=CB
5>A
034@D0C4

8=5>A<0C8>=0;
3>2D<4=CB
0=3
<40=8=65D;
38B2;>BDA4

'
K



0=3

1






3 , -

)

3 , */-

.!,%
'-


*74

(
BC0C4B
C70C
OC74
F4BC4A=
?>AC8>=
>5
C74
?A>942C
B8C4
8B
;>20C43
F8C78=
)054CH
/>=4

F7827
8B
34B86=0C43
“ ==4A
*DA=8=6
/>=4P
C74
B>DC724=CA0;
?>AC8>=
>5
C74
B8C4
8B
; >20C43
F8C78=
)054CH
/>=4

F7827
8B
34B86=0C43
“%DC4A
??A>027
4?0ACDA4
/>=4P
0=3
C74
40BC4A=
?>AC8>=
>5
C74

?A>942C
B8C4
8B
;>20C43
F8C78=
)054CH
/>=4

F7827
8B
34B86=0C 43
“*A05582
&0CC4A=
/>=4PP
>5
C74
)02A0<4=C>
=C4A=0C8>=0;
8A?>AC
"+& 

*74

(
2>=2;D34B
C74
?A>942C
F8;;
70E4
;4BB
C70=

B86=85820=C
8<?02CB
1420DB4
O0;;
5DCDA4
DB4B
F>D;3
14
A4@D8A43
C>
2><?;H
F8C7
C74
2A8C4A80
5>A
2>=38C8>=0;
DB4B
0B
B7>F=
8=
*01;4


>5
C74
"+&
C>
4=BDA4
B 054CH
2><?0C818;8CH
F8C7
C74
)02A0<4=C>
=C4A=0C8>=0;
8A?>AC P

*74

(
3>4B
=>C
?A>E834
0=H
<40=8=65D;
4E834=24
C>
BD??>AC

0
;4BB
C70=
B86=85820=C
58=38=6

*74

(
8B
<8B;4038=6
C>
C74
?D1;82
0=3
3428B8>=
<0:4AB
1H
4G2;D38=6
8=5>A<0C8>=
A460A38=6
C74
BC0CDC>A8;H
A4@D8A43
A4E84F
1H
)%
"+

*74
?A>?>B43

?A>942C
A4@D8A4B
0

4=4A0;
&;0=
<4=3<4=C
C>
270=64
C74
;0=3
DB4
34B86=0C8>=
>=
C74
?A>942C
B8C4

&A8>A
C>
C74
0<4=3<4=C
>5
0

4=4A0;
&;0=
C74
"+
B70;;
A4E84F
C74
?;0=
>A38=0=24
>A
A46D;0C8>=
5>A
2>=B8BC4=2H
F8C7
C74
"+&
&+
)42C8>=

1

-78;4
C74
&A>942C
4B2A8?C8>=
>5
C74

(
BC0C4B
C70C
)%

"+
A4E84F
8B
A4@D8A43
8C
8B
4G2;D343
5A><
0=0;HB8B
F8C78=
C78B
B42C8>=


,8847;;;7%'3+36+,31)7,3;49&0-7,)((3'91)28








%0-*362-%
-64368

0%22-2+
%2(
#7)
%2(&33/
!)'8-32
 

#
):-);
,8847(38'%+3:
1)(-%(381)(-%463+6%17%)632%98-'7(3'91)287'%0-*362-%%-643680%2(97)40%22-2+,%2(&33/%=4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

26 *74

(
<DBC
14
A4E8B43
C>
8=2;D34
0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
0B
C74
?A>942C
3>4B
=>C
2><?;H
F8C7
&+
)42C8>=

1



$>C01;H
C74
"0=3
+B4
0=3
&;0==8=6
0=0;HB8B
BC0C4B
C70C
O>=
!D ;H



)%

?A4?0A43
0=

"+
&A4;8<8=0AH
(4E84F
C>
34C4A<8=4
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C’B
2><?0C818;8CH
F8C7
C74
)#

"+&P
0=3
)%

?A>E8343
2>=38C8>=B
>5
0??A>E0;

>F4E4A
C74
)%
"+

&A4;8<8=0AH
(4E84F
0=3
2>=38C8>=B
>5
0??A>E0;
0A4
=>C
8=2;D343
5>A
?D1;82
A4E84F
F7827
3>4B
=>C
2><?;H
F8C7

'RB
A4@D8A4<4=CB
5>A
034@D0C4
8=5>A<0C8>=0;
3>2D<4=CB
0=3
<40=8=65D;
38B2;>BDA4

'
K



0=3

1

=2>A?>A0C8>=
1H
A454A4=24

'
K




5
8B
=>C

0??A>?A80C4
0B
C74
)%

"+
&A4;8<8=0AH
(4E84F
0=3
2>=38C8>=B
>5
0??A>E0;
2>=CA81DC4
38A42C;H
C>
0=0;HB8B
>5
C74
?A>1;4<
0C
70=3


A4E8B43
(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43
C>
8=2;D34
C74
)%


"+
&A4;8<8=0AH
(4E84F
0=3
2>=38C8>=B
>5
0??A>E0;
5>A
A4E84F
0=0;HB8B
0=3
2><<4=C
1H
C74
?D1;82
0=3
3428B8>=
<0:4AB
8=
>A34A
C>
2><?;H
F8C7
 'RB
A4@D8A4<4=CB
5>A
034@D0C4

8=5>A<0C8>=0;
3>2D<4=CB
0=3
<40=8=65D;
38B2;>BDA4

'
K



0=3

1





)

-!

)
'
))%)#*+/'
.%*)

)
*/-%)#



C
<DBC
58ABC
14
=>C43
C70C
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
8B
=>C
2>=B8BC 4=C
F8C7
C74
?A>?>B43
4=4A0;
&;0=

;0=3
DB4
34B86=0C8>=
>5

<?;>H<4=C
#8G43
+B4

*74
8CHRB

4=4A0;
&;0=
BC0C4B
C70C
C74

<?;>H<4=C
#8G43
+B4
34B86=0C8>=
8B
8=C4=343
C>
1D554A
A4B834 =C80;
DB4B
5A><
<>A4
8=C4=B4

 

0=3







02C8E8C84B
0=3
C>
?A>E834
2><?0C81;4
4<?;>H<4=C
DB4B
=40A
78674A34=B8CH
0=3
<8G43DB4
7>DB8=6
*78B
34B86=0C8>=
?A>E834B
5>A
0
A0=64
>5




 


0=3





DB4B P

*74
8=3DBCA80;
?>AC8>=
>5
C74
?A>942C
8B
4G2;DB8E4;H
F 0A47>DB8=6
0=3
38BCA81DC8>=
F7827
8B
0=
8=C4=B4
B46<4=C
>5
C74
1A>03
;867C
8= 3DBCA80;
20C46>AH
C70C
8=E>;E4B
7867
A0C4B
>5
CAD2:
CA8?B

*74
?A>942C
8B
2>=B8BC4=C
F8C7
C74
=3DB CA80;
#8G43
+B4
34B86=0C8>=
F7827
O?A>E834B
5>A
<0=D502CDA8=6
F0A47>DB8=6
0=3
>C74A
4<?;>H<4=C64=4A0C8=6
DB4B
C70C
<0H
?A>3D24
;>D3
=>8B4
>A
>3>AB
0=3
C4=3
C>
70E4
0
7867
E>;D<4
>5
C AD2:
CA05582 P

>F4E4A
C74
=3DBCA80;
#8G43
+B4
34B86=0C8>=
OB7>D;3
=>C
14
;>20C43
=4GC
C>
0
A4B834=C80;
=48671>A7>>3
F8C7>DC
BD1BC0=C80;
1D554AB
8 4 
>55824
DB4B
A468>=0;
?0A:B
6A44=F0HB
>A
>?4=
B?024P
<40=8=6
C70C
8C
B7>D;3
=>C
14
0??;843
C>
C74
?A>942C
B8C4
4E4=
C7>D67
8C
8B
C74
0??A>?A80C4
;0=3
DB4
34B86=0C8>=
5>A
C74
?A>?>B43
F0A47>DB8=6
0=3
38BCA81DC8>=
0B?42C
>5
C74
?A> 942C

*74
(
<DBC
14
A4E8B43
C>

8=2;D34
C78B
8=5>A<0C8>=
5>A
0=0;HB8B
0=3
8=2;D34
0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
0B
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
8B
=>C
2>=B8BC4=C
F8C7
C74

<?;>H<4=C
#8G43
+B4
34B86=0C8>=



*74
?A>942C
5024B
B86=85820=C
8=2>=B8BC4=284B
F8C7
BC0CDC>AH
A4@D8A4<4=CB
>5
C74
>DB8=6
A8B8B
2C

>5


)4=0C4
8;;
)


)


*74

)


)

A4@D8A4
A4?;024<4=C


397-2+
6-7-7
'8
3*
!


,88470)+-2*30)+-70%896)'%+3:*%')7&-00")<80-)28<,810&-00$-(! 

!

,88470)+-2*30)+-70%896)'%+3:*%')7&-00")<80-)28<,810&-00$-(!
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

27 7>DB8=6
B8C4B
F74=
;0=3
34B86=0C43
5>A
7>DB8=6
34E4;>?<4=C
4G?4A84=24
;0=3
DB4
270=64B
C>
4=BDA4
=>
=4C
;>BB
>5
7>DB8=6
20?028CH

*74

(
BC0C4B
C70C
O 10B43
>=
C74
4G8BC8=6
)02A0<4=C>

>D=CH

4=4A0;
&;0=
;0=3
DB4
0=3
I>=8=6
34B86=0C8>=B
5>A
C74
?A>942C
B8C4
A4B834=C80;
34E4;>?<4=C
F0B
=>C
0=C828?0C43
0C
C74
?A>942C
B8C4 P

>F4E4A
C78B
BC0C4< 4=C
8B
4AA>=4>DB
0=3
<8B;4038=6
C>
C74
?D1;82
0=3
3428B8>=
<0:4AB
0=3
<DBC
14
A4?;0243
F8C7
502CD0;
8=5>A<0C8>=
0B
?0AC
>5
0
A4E8B43

(

*74
?A>942C
B8C4
70B
0=
4G8BC8=6
)02A0<4=C>
>D=CH
"0=3
+B4
;4<4=C
34B86=0C8>=
>5

6A82D;CDA0;
A>?;0=3 
F7827
O0;;>FB
B8=6;4
50<8;H
3F4;;8=6
D=8CB
0C
0
34=B8CH
=>
6A 40C4A
C70=


02A4B
?4A
D=8C P

*74A45>A4
C74
 
02A4
?A>942C
B8C4
70B
0=
4G8BC8=6
A4B834=C80;
34E4;>?<4=C
20?028CH
>5

3F4;;8=6
D=8CB

>E4A=<4=C
>34
)42C8>=


1
 
A4@D8A4B
C70C
064=284B
B 70;;
=>C
“270=64
C74
64=4A0;
?;0=
;0=3
DB4
34B86=0C8>=
B?428582
?;0=
;0=3
DB4
34B86=0C8>=
>A
I>=8=6
C>
0
;4BB
8=C4=B8E4
DB4
14;>F
F70C
F0B
0;;>F43
D=34A
C74
;0=3
DB4
34B86=0C8>=
0=3
I>=8=6
>A38=0=24B
8=
45542C
0C
C74
C8<4
>5
C74
?A>?>B43
270=64 P
+=34A

>E4A=<4=C
>34
)42C8>=


1

0
“;4BB
8=C4=B8E4
DB4P

8=2;D34B
1DC
8B
=>C
;8<8C43
C>
A43D2C8>=B
C>
74867C
34=B8CH
>A
5;>>A
0A40
A0C8>
=4F
>A
8=2A40B43
>?4=
B?024
>A
;>C
B8I4
A4@D8A4<4=CB
>A
=4F
>A
8=2A40B43
B4C102:
A4@D8A4<4=CB
<8=8<D<
5A>=C064
A4@D8A4<4=CB
>A
<0G8<D<
;>C
2>E4A064
;8<8C0C8>=B
>A
0=H
>C74A
02C8>=
C70C
F>D;3
8=38E83D0;;H
>A
2D<D;0C8E4;H
A43D24
A4B834=C80;
34E4;>?<4=C
20?028CH

&DABD0=C
C>
)
 
A4?;024<4=C
20?028CH

5>A
0=H
38B?;0243
A4B834=C80;
D=8CB
<DBC
14
?A>E8343
*)/,,!).'2
0C
C74
.%(!
*"
+,*&!.
++,*0
'

>E4A=<4=C
>34
)42C8>=


78

BC0C4B
C70C
OC78B
B42C 8>=
3>4B
=>C
?A>7818C
0=
05542C43
2>D=CH
>A
0=
05542C43
28CH
8=2;D38=6
C74
;>20;
4;42C>A0C4
02C8=6
C7A>D67
C74
8=8C80C8E4
?A>24BB
5A><
270=68=6
0
;0=3
DB4
34B86=0C8>=
>A
I>=8=6
>A38=0=24
C>
0
;4BB
8=C4=B8E4
DB4
>A
A43D28=6
C74
8=C4=B8CH
>5
;0=3
DB4
85
C74
28CH
>A
2>D=CH
2>=2DAA4=C;H
270=64B
C74
34E4;>?<4=C
BC0=30A3B
?>;8284B
0=3
2>=38C8>=B
0??;8201;4
C>
>C74A
?0A24;B
F8C78=
C74
9DA8B382C8>=
C>
4=BDA4
C70C
C74A4
8B
=>
=4C
;>BB
8=
A4B834=C80;
20?028CH P

B
20;2D;0C43
01>E4
C74
?A>942C
B8C4RB
)02A0<4=C>
>D=CH
"0=3
+B4

;4<4=C
34B86=0C8>=
>5
6A82D;CDA0;
A>?;0=3
?A>E834B
34E4;>?<4=C
20?028CH
5>A

A4B834=C80;
D=8CB

3>?C8>=
>5
C74
?A>?>B43
)%
<4=3<4=C
4= 4A0;
&;0=
<4=3<4=C
0=3

&A4I>=8=6
0B
?0AC
>5
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
F8;;
A4BD;C
8=
0
A43D 2C8>=
>5
C74
4G8BC8=6
A4B834=C80;
34E4;>?<4=C
20?028CH
1H

D=8CB
C>
0
342A40B43
34E4;>?<4=C
20?028CH
>5


A4B834=C80;
D=8CB





*78B
8B
8=
2>=5;82C
F8C7
)

C70C
4G?0=343
C74
?A>E8B8>=B
>5
C74

C>
8=2;D34
>E4A=<4=C
>34

)42C8>=


78

A4@D8A8=6
2>=2DAA4=C
0??A>E0;
>5
A4?;024<4=C
B8C4B
C>
4=BDA4
=>
=4C
;>BB
8=
A4B834=C80;
20?028CH
0=3
)42C8>=


7

3458=8=6
“2>=2DAA4=C;HP
C>
<40=
C74
02C8>=
8B

0??A>E43
0C
C74
B0<4
<44C8=6
>5
C74
;468B;0C8E4
1>3H

*74
(
70B
=>C
834=C85843
A4?;024<4=C
B8C4B

5>A
C74
=4C
;>BB
8=
A4B834=C80;
20?028CH
5>A

D=8CB
0B
0
A4BD;C
>5
?A>942C
8<?;4<4=C0C8>=

*74
;>BB


,884740%22-2+7%''3928=+3:3'91)287%2(#7)0)1)281)2()(  4(*

Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

28 8=
A4B834=C80;
20?028CH
<DBC
14
8=2;D343
0B
0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
0B
?0AC
>5
0
A4E8B43
(

*74

(
3>4B
=>C
02C
8=
2>=5>A<0=24
F8C7
C74

)


)

0=3
C7 4
;>BC
I>=8=6
20?028CH
>5
0=H

3F4;;8=6
D=8CB
8B
0
B86=85820=C
4=E8A>=<4=C0;
8<?02C
8=
E8>;0C8 >=
>5
C74
 )


)


*74

(
<DBC
14
A4E8B43
C>
8=2;D34
0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
3D4
C>
C78B
8=2>=B8BC4=2H






338C8>=0;;H
3454AA8=6
C74
4=E8A >=<4=C0;
0=0;HB8B
>5
2>=BCAD2C 8>=
0=3
>?4A0C8>=
>5
A4?;024<4=C
B8C4B
C>
0
;0C4A
30C4
8B
?A>942C
?8424<40;8=6
8=
E8>;0C8>=
>5
 '

*74

(
3>4B
=>C
022DA0C4;H
>A

034@D0C4;H
34B2A814
C74
?A>942C
<40=8=6
“C74
F7>;4
>5
0=
02C8>=
F7827
70B
0
?>C4=C80;
5>A
A4BD;C8=6
8=
48C74A
0
38A42C
?7HB820;
270=64
8=
C74
4=E8A>=<4=C
>A
0
A40B>=01;H
5>A4B4401;4
8=38A42C
?7HB820;
270=64
8=
C74
4=E8A>=<4=CP

'
K



*74
F7>;4
>5
C74
02C8>=
<DBC
BC0CDC>A8;H

0=3
;460;;H
8=2;D34
C74
834=C85820C8>=
>5
A4?;024<4=C
B8C4B
0=3
0;;
0BB>280C43
02C8>=B
A4@D8A43
C>
8<?;4<4=C
34E4;>?<4=C
>5
0C
;40BC

A4B834=C80;
D=8CB



*01;4
 
8B2DBB8>=
>5
(4;4E0=C
)02A0<4=C>
"
>
&>;8284B
?A >E834B
4AA>=4>DB
0=3

<8B;4038=6
2>=B8BC4=2H
0=0;HB8B


>A
4G0<?;4
C74

(
2>=2;D34 B
C74
?A>942C
8B
2>=B8BC4=C
F8C7

O"
>
&>;82H

<4=3<4=C
?A>?>B0;B
8=E>;E8=6
)?74A4
4G?0=B 8>=
F7827
2>=C08=
?A8<4
06A82D;CDA0;
;0=3
F8;;
=>C
14
0??A>E43
1H
C74
"
>
85
C74A4
8B
BD558284=C
0;C4A=0C8E4
;0=3
0E08;01;4

5>A
0==4G0C8>=
F8C78=
C74
4G8BC8=6
)?74A4
>5
=5;D4=24P
1H
28C8=6
0=0;HB8B
C70C
O0=
0;C4A=0C4
;>20C8>=
F8C78=
C74
8CH
8B
=>C
2DAA4=C;H
0E08;01;4
C>
B4AE4
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942CP
0=3
O1D8;3>DC
>5
C74
B8C4
>=
0;C4A=0C8E4
;0=3
>DC B834
1DC
039024=C
C>
C74
8CH ’B
)%
F>D;3
;8:4;H
A4BD;C
8=
B8<8;0A
2>=E4AB8>=
>5

0A<;0=3
0B
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
68E4=
C74
?A4E0;4=24
>5
06A82D;CDA0;
;0=3
039024=C
C>
C74
8CH’B
)% P

*74

(
38B2DBB4B
;0=3
>DCB834
C74
)%
0=3
;0=3
F8C78=
C74
8=2>A?>A0C43
8CH
;8<8CB
*74

(
70B
=>C
?A>E8343
0=H
0=0;HB8B
>5
C74
8BBD4
834=C85843
8=
&>;82H

F7827
A460A3B
0;C4A=0C8E4
;0=3
F8C78=
C74
4G8BC 8=6
)?74A4
>5
=5;D4=24

*74
(
<DBC
14
A4E8B43
C>
8=2;D34
0

58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
0B
8C
70B
=>C
?A>E8343
0=H
<40=8=65D;
4 E834=24
C>
BD??>AC
0
;4BB
C70=
B86=85820=C
58=38=6




*74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
A4@D4BCB
0??A>E0;
>5
0
&+
)274<0C82
&;0=
0=3
&+
D834;8=4B
5>A
C74

1>C7
C74
#

0=3

0A40B

*74

(
BC0C4B
C70C
OC74
&+

D834 ;8=4B
34E4;>?43
5>A
C74
?A>942C

B8C4
8=2;D34
34B86=
BC0=30A3B
5>A
B8C4
34B86=
1D8;38=6
34B86=
;0=3B20?8=6
B86=064
0=3
;867C8=6 P

>F4E4A
C74
2><?;4C4
&+
6D834;8=4B
0A4
=>C
8=2;D343
5>A
?D1;82
A4E84F
F7827
3>4B
=>C
2><?;H
F8C7

'RB
A4@D8A4<4=CB
5>A
034@D0C4
8=5>A<0C8>=0;
3>2D<4=CB
0=3
<40=8=65D;
38B2;>BDA4

'
K



0=3

1

=2>A?>A0C8>=
1H
A454A4=24

'
K




5
8B
=>C
0??A>?A80C4

0B
C74
2><?;4C4
&+
6D834;8=4B
2>=CA81DC4
38A42C;H
C>
0=0;HB8B
>5
C74
?A>1;4<
0C
70=3


A4E8B43

(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43
C>
8=2;D34
C74
2><?;4C4
&+
6D834;8=4B
5>A
A4E84F
0=0;HB8B
0=3
2><<4=C
1H
C74
?D1;82
0=3
3428B8>=
<0:4AB
8=
>A34A
C>
2><?;H
F8C7
 'R B
A4@D8A4<4=CB
5>A
034@D0C4

8=5>A<0C8>=0;
3>2D<4=CB
0=3
<40=8=65D;
38B2;>BDA4

'
K



0=3

1



Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

29 *74

(
2>=2;D34B
C70C
OC74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
F>D;3
14
2>=B8BC4 =C
F8C7
C74
8CH
>5
)02A0<4=C>




4=4A0;
&;0=
0=3
&;0==8=6
0=3
4E4;>?<4=C
>34 P

>F4E4A
C74
(
70B
=>C
?A>E8343

0=H
<40=8=65D;
4E834=24
C>
BD??>AC
C78B
2;08<


>A
4G0<?;4
C7 4
?A>?>B43
2>=E4=84=24
BC>A4

0BB>280C43
F8C7
C74
60B
BC0C8>=
20A
F0B7
8B


B@D0A4
544C
 ?4A
??4=38G
$
*A05582
<?02C

=0;HB8B
F78;4
)02A0<4=C>
#D=828?0;
>34
)42C8>=



 


I>=4N&4A<8CC43
DB4B

;8<8CB
A4C08;
BC>A4B
C>


B@D0A4
544C
8=
B8I4

*74

(
<DB C
14
A4E8B43
C>
8=2;D34
0
58=38=6
>5

B86=85820=24
0B
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
3>4B
=>C
2><?;H
F8C7
C74
)02A0<4=C>
#D=828?0;
>34


*74

(
BC0C4B
C70C
OC74
34C4A<8=0C8>=
>5
B86=85820=24
8B
10B4 3
>=
F74C74A
?>?D;0C8>=
6A>FC7
0BB>280C43
F8C7
0
?A>942C
70B
144=
?A4E8>DB;H
?;0==43
5>A
0=3
F74C74A
BD27
6A>FC7
2>D;3
A4BD;C
8=
8=38A42C
8<?02CB
5A><
0BB>280C4 3
34E4;>?<4=C P

C
8B
2;40A
C70C
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
70B
=>C
?A4E8>DB;H
144=
?;0==43
5>A
DA10=
34E4;>?<4=C
0B
8C
8B
34B86=0C 43
5>A
6A82D;CDA0;
DB4B
1H
C74
>D=CH
>5
)02A0<4=C>
0=3
8B
>DCB834
C74
8CH
>5
)02A0<4=C>RB
)?74A4
>5
=5;D4=24
0A40

<?02CB
F8;;
A4BD;C
5A><
34E4;>?<4=C
>5
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
8=2;D38=6
B86=85820=C
0=3
D=0E>8301;4
2D<D;0C8E4;H
2>=B834A01;4
8<?02CB
C>
4BC74C82B
6A82D;CDA0;
(4B>DA24B
8A
'D0;8CH
0=3

A44=7>DB4

0B

<8BB8>=B

)8=24
C74
?A>942C
B8C4
F0B
=>C
8=2;D343
5>A
0=0;HB8B
0B
0=
4<?;>H<4=C
64=4A0C8=6
DB4
1H
C74
8CH
>D=CH
>A
)%

8C
8B
A4?A4B4=CB
0=
8=2A40B4
8=
?>?D;0C8>=
0=3

4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC7
C70C
F0B
=>C
022>D=C43
5>A
1H
0=H
064=2H

*74
(
<DBC
14
A4E8B43
C>
8=2;D34

0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
3D4
C>
C78B
B86=85820=C
0=3
D=0E>8301;4
8<?02C



*74

(
0;B>
DC8;8I4B
D=24AC08=
;0=6D064
0=3
3>4B
=>C
?A>E834
0=H
<40=8=65D;
0=0;HB8B
>A
BD??>AC8=6
4E834=24
C>
BD1BC0=C80 C4
C74
2>=2;DB8>=
C70C
C74A4
F 8;;
14
=>
B86=85820=C
8<?02CB
C>
?>?D;0C8>=
0=3
7>DB8=6


>A
4G0<?;4
C74

(
BC0C4B
C70C
F78;4
C74
?A>942C
2>D;3
8=38A42C;H
0CCA02C
A4B834=CB
C>
C74
0A40
5>A
4<?;>H<4=C
>??>ACD=8C84B
=4F
4<?;>H4 4B
F>D;3
 

14
3A0F=
5A><

2DAA4=C
A4B834=CB
8=
C74




P
0=3
C74
64>6A0?782
1>D=30A84B
>5
C74
OBDAA>D=38=6

0A40P
0A4
D=3458=43

(4;H8=6
>=
C74
4=C8A4
;01>A
5>A24
F8C78=
0=
D=3458=43
38BC0=24
=>C01;H
C74
6A40C4A
)%

A468>=
C>
58;;
C74
?A>942CRB
2>=BCAD2C8>=
0=3
>?4A0C8>=0;
9>1B
F8;;
8=2A40B4
A0C4B
>5
,#*
0=3
4<8BB8>=B
3DA8=6
0;;
?70B4B
>5
2>=BCAD2C8>=
0=3
>?4A0C8>=B
0=3
0=
(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43

C>
022>D=C
5>A
;>=64A
F>A:4A
CA8?
38BC0=24B

*78B
D=24AC08=
;0 =6D064
8B
=>C
BD??>AC43
1H
0=H
8=5>A<0C8>=
BD27
0B
C74
2DAA4=C
D=4<?;>H<4=C
A0C4B
8=
C74
8CH >D=CH
>A
4E834=24
C70C
C74

D=4<?;>H43
?>?D;0C8>=
8B
@D0;85843
5>A
>A
8=C4A4BC43
8=
F>A:
8=
C74
8=3DBCA80;
B42C>A

*74
(
<DBC

14
A4E8B43
C>
8=2;D34
0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
0B
8C
70B
=>C
? A>E8343
0=H
<40=8=65D;
4E834=24
C>
BD??>AC
0
;4BB
C70=
B86=85820=C
58=38=6


*74

(
2>=C8=D4B
1H
BC0C8=6
C70C
>=B4AE0C8E4;H
4BC8<0C8=6
C70C
0;;
?4A<0=4=C
?>B8C8>=B
0BB>280C43
F8C7
C74
?A>942C
F>D;3
14
58;;43
1H
=4F
A4B834=CB
C>
C74
 



0=3

0BBD<8=6
C70C
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
F>D;3
14
5D;;H
1D8;C
>DC
0=3
>?4A0C8=6
0C
5D;;
20?028CH
1H



C74
?A>942C’B
2>=CA81DC8>=
C>
C74
>E4A0;;
?>?D;0C8>=
8=2A40B4
1H


F>D;3
14
0??A>G8<0C4;H
 

?4A24=C


=4F
A4B834=CB
S



A4B834=CB
*7DB
C74
8= 2A40B4
8=
9>1B
F>D;3
14





Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

30 
2><?0A43
C>
C74
8CH’B
4G8BC8=6
0=3
0=C828?0C43
?>?D;0C8>=
;4E4;B P

C
<DBC
14
=>C43
C70C
C74
?A>942C
B8C4
8B
=>C
F8C78=
C74
8=2>A?>A0C43
8CH
;8<8CB
>A
C74
8CHRB
)?74A4
>5
=5;D4=24
0=3
C74A45>A4
F0B
=>C
022>D=C43
5>A
F8C78=
C74



A4B834=C
C>C0;
0=3
C7 4A45>A4
A4?A4B4=CB
0=
8=2A40B4
>5


=4F
A4B834=CB
01>E4
C74


?A>942C8>=
*74

(
70B
=>C
?A>E8343
0=H
A4;4E0=C
0=0;HB8B

A460A38=6
C74
8CHRB
4<?;>H<4=C
?A>942C8>=B
)8=24
C74
?A>942C
B8C4
F0B
=>C
8=2;D343
5>A
0=0;HB8B
0B
0=
4<?;>H<4=C
64=4A0C8=6
DB4
1H
C74
8CH
>D=CH
>A
)% 
8C
8B
A4?A4B4=CB
0=
8=2A40B4
8=

?>?D;0C8>=
0=3
4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC7
C70C
F0B
=>C
022>D=C43
5>A
1H
0=H
064=2H

*74
(
<DBC
14

A4E8B43
C>
8=2;D34
0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
3D4
C>
C78B
B86=85820=C
0=3
D=0E>8301;4
8<?02C

)02A0<4=C>
>D=28;
>5

>E4A=<4=CB
)%

03>?C43
C74

#4CA >?>;8C0=
*A0=B?>AC0C8>=

&;0=
)DBC08=01;4
><<D=8C84B
)CA0C46H
#*&
))
>=
$>E4<14A







86DA4
 

><<D=8CH
*H?4B
F8C78=
C74

#*&
))
834=C8584B
C74
?A>942C
B8C4
0B
O"0=3
$>C
34=C85843
5>A
4E4;>?<4=C
8=
C74
#*&
))
&;0==8=6
&4A8>3P
<40=8=6
C70C
8 C
F0B
=>C
8=2;D343
8=
0=H
6A>FC7
5>A420BC8=6
0=3
C74
#*&
))
834=C8584B


6A>FC7
8=
C74B4
0A40B

*74
#*&
))
=>C4B
C70C

C74

BC01;8B743
><<D=8C84B
8=
C74
)%

A468>=
F8;;
033


 
9>1B
14CF44=








86DA4
 
><<D=8CH
*H?4B
0=3
*01;4


)D<<0AH
>5

G?42C43
 >DB8=6
0=3

<?;>H<4=C

A>FC7
1H
><<D=8CH
*H?4

+C8;8I8=6
C74

(RB
20;2D;0C8>=
>5


4<?;>H44B
C74
?A>942C

A4?A4B4=CB
0


8=2A40B4
01>E4
C74
4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC7
?A>942C8>=B
5A><






F8C78=
0;;

>5
)%
RB

BC01;8B743
><<D=8C84B


B8=6;4
?A>942C
022>D=C8=6
5>A
C78B
0<>D=C
>5
C74
?A>942C43
4<?;>H<4=C
0=3
>A
?>?D;0C8>=
>E4A


H40AB
A4?A4B4=CB
0
B86=85820=C
0<>D=C
>5
6A>FC7



A4E8B43

(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43
C>
8=2;D34
C78B
0=0;HB8B
0=3
0; B>
?A>E834
0
2D<D;0C8E4
0=0;HB8B
38B2DBB8>=
>5
?A>942CB
0??A>E43
B8=24


0=3
?A>942CB
O8=
C74
?8?4;8=4P
F8C78=

BC01;8B743

><<D=8C84B
8=
C74
)%

A468>=
C>
34C4A<8=4
85
C74
?A>942C
F8;;
4G2443
)%
RB
4<?;>H<4=C

6A>FC7
5>A420BC
5>A
C74

BC01;8B743
><<D=8C84B


338C8>=0;;H
C74
A4E8B43

(
<DBC
0;B>
?A>E834

34<>6A0?782
0=3
64>6A0?782
8=5>A<0C8>=
>=
C74
;>20C8>=
>5
@D0;85843
F>A:4AB
C>
58;;
C74B4
?>B8C8>=B
8=
>A34A
C>
?A>E834
0=
022DA0C4
4=E8A>=<4=C0;
0=0;HB8B
*01;4
 
8CH
>5
)02A0<4=C>




4=4A0;
&;0=
0=3
)#

"0=3
+B4
><?0C818;8CH
&;0=
&>;82H

8B2DBB8>=
3>4B
=>C
?A>E834
0
2>=B8BC4=2H
0=0;HB8B
F8C7
0;;
?;0=B
?>;8284B
>A
A46D;0C8>=B
03>?C43
5>A
C74
?DA?>B4
>5
0E>838=6
>A
<8C860C8=6
0=
4=E8A>=<4=C0;
4554 2C

*74
?A>942C
70B
B86=85820=C
?>C4=C80;
C>
2>=5;82C
F8C7
<0=H
>5
C74B4
8C4<B
0??;8201;4
C>
C7 4
?A>942C
B8C4
8=2;D38=6
1DC
=>C
;8<8C43
C>
C74
5>;;>F8=6
5A><
C74
8CH

4=4A0;
&;0=

> 0 ;
" + & 


2 > < ? 0 2 C
D A 1 0 =
5 > > C ? A8=C
0=3
BDBC08=01;4
34E4;>?<4= C
?0CC4A=
F8C7
8=5A0BCAD2CDA4
C70C
BD??>ACB
4558284=C
34;8E4AH
>5
?D1;82
B4AE8 24B
F78;4
?A>C42C8=6
BDAA>D=38=6
>?4=
B?024
;0=3B






&&#%
'''%"
"$
%
&% 
!
%
&&
!&% &#%%#





Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

31
"+&

><?02C
+A10=

>>C?A8=C
*74
8CH
B70;;
?A><>C4
0
;0=3
0=3
A4B>DA244558284=C
34E4;>?<4=C
?0CC4A=
0=3
C74
?;024<4=C
>5
8=5A0BCAD2CDA4
C>
BD??>AC
4558284=C
34;8E4AH
>5
?D1;82
B4AE824B
0=3
2>=B4AE4
>?4=
B?024
A43D24
E4782;4
<8;4B
CA0E4;43
0=3
8<?A>E4
08A
@D0;8CH

"+&

!>1B>DB8=6
0;0=24
*74
8CH
B70;;
4=2>DA064
0
10;0=2 4
14CF44=
9>1
CH?4
C74
F>A:5>A24
0=3
7>DB8=6
34E4;>?<4=C
C>
A43D24
C74
=460C8E4
8<?02 CB
>5
;>=6
2><<DC4B
0=3
?A>E834
0
A0=64
>5
4<?;>H<4=C
>??>ACD=8C84B
5>A
0;;
28CH
A4B834=CB

"+&

>>A38=0C4
C>
&A>C42C

0A<;0=3
*74
8CH
B70;;
2>=C8=D 4
C>
F>A:
F8C7
)02A0<4=C>
>D=CH
0=3
>C74A
039024=C
9DA8B382C8>=B
C>
8<?;4<4=C
2>=B4AE0C8 >=
?;0=B
?A4B4AE4
50A<;0=3
0=3
?A>C42C
2A8C820;
7018C0C
>DCB834
C74
28CH



"+& 
><?0C818;8CH
F8C7
39>8=8=6
+B4B
*74
8CH
B70;;
4=BDA 4
C70C
C74
8=CA>3D2C8>=
>5
78674A8=C4=B8CH
<8G43DB4
34E4;>?<4=C
0;>=6
<09>A
0AC4A80;
2>AA83>AB
8B
2><?0C81;4
F8C7
039024=C
;0=3
DB4B
?0AC82D;0A;H
A4B834=C80;
DB4B
1H
A4@D8A8=6
540CDA4B
BD27
0B
C74
5>;;>F8=6
D8;38=6B
B4C
102:
5A><
A40A
>A
B834
H0A3
?A>?4ACH
;8=4B
039>8=8=6
B8=6;4D=8C
3F4;;8=6
A4B834=C80;
DB4B
D8;38=6
74867CB
BC4??43
102:
5A><
B4=B8C8E4
039>8=8=6
DB4B
C>
<08=C08=
0??A>?A80C4
CA0=B8C8>=B
8=
B20;4
0=3
C>
<8=8<8I4
8<?02CB
C>
?A8E02H
0=3
B>;0A
0224BB
"0=3B20?43
>55BCA44C
?0A:8=6
0A40B
;>038=6
0A40B
0=3
B4AE824
0A40B
B2A44=43
5A><
039024=C
A4B834=C80;
0A40B
C>
C74
346A44
540B81;4
>A
"867C8=6
B784;343
5A><
E84F
0=3
38A42C43
3>F=F0A3
C>
<8=8<8I4
8<?02CB
>=
039024=C
A4B834=C80;
DB4B


"+& 
D8;38=6B
C70C

=6064
C74
)CA44C
*74
8CH
B70;;
A4@D8A4
C70C
1D8;38=6B
14
>A84=C43
C>
02C8E4;H
4=6064
0=3
4=70=24
C74
?D1;82
A40;<
C7A>D67
C427=8@D4B
BD27
0B
1D8;38=6
>A84=C0C8>=
1D8;3C>
0=3
B4C102:
;8=4B
50J034
0AC82D;0C8>=
6A>D=35;>>A
CA0=B?0A4=2H
0=3
;>20C8>=
>5
?0A:8=6


"+& 

=70=243
&434BCA80=

=E8A>=<4=C
*74
8CH
B70;;
A4@D8A4
C74
34B86=
>5
B834F0;:B
8=
2><<4A280;
0=3
<8G43DB4
0A40B
C>
?A><>C4
F0;:018;8CH
0=3
?434B CA80=
02C8E8CH
F8C7
F83C7B
F834
4=>D67
C>
?A>E834
5>A
5A44
0=3
2;40A
?434BCA80=
DB4
02C8E0C8>=
>5
1D8;38=6
5A>=C064B
F8C7
38B?;0HB
;0=3B20?8=6
0=3
B40C8=6
0A40B
5>A
2054B
0=3
A4BC0DA0=CB

"+&

)70A43
&0A:8=6
A8E4F0HB
0=3
;;4H
224BB
*74
8CH
B70;;
4=2>DA064
C74
2A40C8>=
>5
B70A43
?0A:8=6
0A40B
0=3
B70A43
E4782D;0A
3A8E4F0HB
5>A
0224BB
0;>=6
0AC4A80;
2>AA83>AB
C>
<8=8<8I4
C74
=D<14A
>5
3A8E4F0HB
0=3
2DA1
2DCB
*74
8CH
B7>D;3
0;B>
4=2>DA064
C74
DB4
>5
039024=C
0;;4HB
5>A
E4782D;0A
0224BB



"+&

A8E4*7A>D67
(4BC0DA0=CB
*74
8CH
B70;;
?A>7818C
=4F
3A8E4C7A>D67
A4BC0DA0=CB
F8C78=
V<8;4
F0;:8=6
38BC0=24
5A><
C74
24=C4A
>5
0=
4G8BC8=6
;867C
A08;
BC0C8>=
?;0C5>A<
>A
78675A4@D4=2H
CA0=B8C
BC>?
0=3
W<8;4
F0;:8=6
38BC0=24
5A><
C 74
24=C4A
>5
0
?A>?>B43
;867C
A08;
BC0C8>=

"+&


DCDA4(403H

0B
)C0C8>=B
*74
8CH
B70;;
?A>7818C
C74
4BC01;8B7<4=C
>5
=4F
60B
BC0C8>=B
>A
C74
4G?0=B8>=
>5
=4F
5>BB8;
5D4;
8=5A0BCAD2CDA4
0C
4G8BC8=6
60B
BC0C8>=B
D=;4BB
C74
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

32 ?A>942C
?A>?>=4=C
?A>E834B

:-
>A
6A40C4A
8A42C
DAA4=C

0BC
70A64A


4;42CA82

E4782;4
270A68=6
BC0C8>=B
>=
B8C4
0C
0
A0C8>
>5
0C
;40BC

=4F
270A68=6
BC0C8>=
?4A


=4F
60B
5D4;

=>II;4

>0;
"+&
=3DBCA80;
>??>ACD=8C84B
8=
BD8C01;4
;>20C8>=B
C>
?A >E834
4<?;>H<4=C
5>A
)02A0<4=C>
A4B834=CB
0=3
?A><>C4
8=2;DB8E4
42>=><82
6A>FC7
8=
C74
28CH

"+& 
4E4;>?<4=C
39024=C
C>

A44F0HB
0=3
(08;A>03
>AA83>AB
*74
8CH
B70;;
?A><>C4
7867@D0;8CH
34B86=
>5
1D8;38=6B
0;>=6
5A44F0H
0=3
A08;F0H
2>AA 83>AB
8=2;D38=6
?A><>C8=6
C427=8@D4B
BD27
0B
C74
5>;;>F8=6
(4@D8A8=6
4GC4=B8E4
;0=3B20?8=6
0=3
CA44B
0;>=6
C74
5A44F0H
5A>=C8=6
4;4E0C8>=
8=
2>=BD;C0C8>=
F8C7
8CH
BC055
C74
)02A0<4 =C>
#4CA>?>;8C0=
8A
'D0;8CH
#0=064<4=C
8BCA82C
0=3
0;CA0=B 

BC01;8B78=6
0
2>=B8BC4=C
1D 8;38=6
;8=4
0AC82D;0C8=6
0=3
<>3D;0C8=6
1D8;38=6
4;4E0C8>=B
0 =3
74867CB
0=3
E0AH8=6
C74
DB4
>5
<0C4A80;B
0=3
2>;>A
C>
2A40C4
E8BD0;
8=C4A4BC
0=3
=2;D38=6
34B86=
4;4<4=CB
C70C
A43D24
=>8B4
0=3
?A>E834
5>A
58;C4A8=6
E4=C8;0C8>=
0=3
4G70DBC
>5
E4782;4
08A
4<8BB8>=B


"+& 
&4>?;4
A84=3;H
4B86=
*74
8CH
B70;;
A4@D8A4
?4>?;45A84=3;H
34B86=
C>
14
8=2>A?>A0C43
8=C>
1D8;38=6B
0=3
B?024B
8=2;D38=6
4;4<4=CB
0=3
540CDA4B
BD27
0B
C74
5>;;>F8=6
D<0=
B20;4
CA44B70343
?434BCA80=
?0BB064F0HB
(4BC8=6
0A40B
)40C8=6
0C74A8=6
?;024B

0=3
%C74A
<40BDA4B
F8C7
34<>=BCA0C43
14=458CB
5>A
740;C7
0=3
@D0;8CH
>5
;854


"+&

(4B?>=B8E4=4BB
C>
>=C4GC
*74
8CH
B70;;
A4@D8A4
1D8; 38=6
0=3
B8C4
34B86=
C70C
A4B?42CB
0=3
A4B?>=3B
C>
C74
;>20;
2>=C4GC
8=2;D38=6
DB4
>5
;> 20;
<0C4A80;B
0=3
?;0=C
B?4284B
F74A4
540B81;4
A4B?>=B8E4=4BB
C>
)02A0<4=C>’B
2;8<0C4
0=3
2>=B834A0C8>=
>5
2D;CDA0;
0=3
78BC>A82
2>=C4GC
>5
)02A0<4=C>’B
=48671>A7>>3B
2>AA83>AB
0=3
24=C4AB


"+&

$48671>A7>>3
0=3
*A0=B8C8>=B
*74
8CH
B70;;
4=BDA4
C7 0C
34E4;>?<4=C
BC0=30A3B
5028;8C0C4
CA0=B8C8>=B
14CF44=
0A40B
C70C
1>A34A
>=4
0=>C74A
B>
C70C
=48671>A7>>3B
0=3
38BCA82CB
<08=C08=
C748A
>F=
D=8@D4
@D0;8C84B



>0;
"+&

A40C4
1D8;C
0=3
=0CDA0;
4=E8A>=<4=CB
F8C78=
C74
28 CH
C70C
?A8>A8C8I4
BD??>AC
?A><>C4
0=3
4<1A024
B>280;
4@D8CH
42>;>6820;
A464=4A0C8>=
A4 B?>=B81;4
A4B>DA24
BC4F0A3B78?
0=3
7D<0=
740;C7
0=3
F4;;148=6


"+&


>=BCAD2C8>=
&A>24BB4B
*74
8CH
B70;;
4=2>DA064
>=B8C4
2>=BCAD2C8>=
?A>24BB4B
C70C
A43D24
4=E8A>=<4=C0;
70A<
0=3
BD??>AC
BDBC08=01;4
<4C7>3B


#


<?A>E4
-0;:8=6
>==42C8E8CH
*74
8CH
B70;;
A4@D8A4
=4F
BD138E8B8>=B
=4F
<D;C8D=8C
3F4;;8=6
34E4;>?<4=CB
0=3
=4F
34E4;>?<4=CB
0;>=6
2><<4A280;
2>AA83>AB
C>
8=2;D34
F4;;;8C
CA44B70343
F0;:F0HB
F74A4
540B81;4
C70C
?A> E834
38A42C
;8=:B
C>
C74
?D1;82
A40;<
>A
039024=C
?D1;82
34BC8=0C8>=B
BD27
0B
CA0=B8C
BC>?B
0=3
BC0C8>=B
B27>>;B
?0A:B
0=3
B7>??8=6
24=C4AB


#


)70A43
&0A:8=6
*7A>D67
C74
34E4;>?<4=C
A4E84F
?A>24BB
C74
8CH
B70;;
4=2>DA064
?A>942C
0??;820=CB
?A>?>B8=6
3D?;4G
<D;C8D=8C
<8G43
DB4
0=3
=>=A4B834=C80;
?A>942CB
C>
58ABC
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

33 4G?;>A4
B70A43DB4
>5
4G8BC8=6
?0A:8=6
B?024B
C70C
20=
14
0E08;01;4
5>A
3D0;
DB4B
145>A4
?A>?>B8=6
C>
2>=BCAD2C
=4F
?0A:8=6
5028;8C84B

# 
*A05582
*74
8CH
B70;;
B D??>AC
?;0==8=6
0=3
<0=068=6
CA0 5582
5A><
C74
?4AB?42C8E4
>5
C74
039024=C
DB4B
DB8=6
CA05582
<0=064<4=C
0=3
CA05582
20;<8=6
C427=8@D4B

# 
=C46A0C43

>>3B
#>E4<4=C
*74
8CH
B70;;
F>A:
C>
4=BDA4
C70C
C74
6>>3B
<>E4<4=C
B42C>A
8B
8=C46A0C43
F8C7
C74
A4BC
>5
C74
CA0=B?>AC0C8>=
BHBC4<
8=
BD27
0
F0H
C70C
3>4B
=>C
4=30=64A
C74
740;C7
0=3
B054CH
>5
A4B834=CB
0=3
>C74A
A>03F0H
DB4AB

>0;

!

;40=
08A
F0C4A
0=3
B>8;
F8C7
=>
B46<4=C
>5
C74
2>< <D=8CH
38B?A>?>AC8>=0C4;H
1DA34=43
1H
4=E8A>=<4=C
2>=38C8>=B



!

+A10=
6A82D;CDA4
8=
$4F
4E4;>?<4=C
*74
8CH
B70;;
?A><>C4
A>>5C>?
60A34=B
4381;4
60A34=B
0=3
>C74A
BDBC08=01;4
06A82D;CDA0;
;0=3B20?8=6
0;C4A=0C8E4B
F8C78=
<D;C8D=8C
2><<4A280;
0=3
8=3DBCA80;
34E4;>?<4=CB



!


"8<8C
+=740;C7H

>>3

BC01;8B7<4=CB
*74
8CH
B70;;
4G? ;>A4
<4270=8B<B
C>
;8<8C
D=740;C7H
5>>3
4BC01;8B7<4=CB
4B?4280;;H
8=
38B03E0=C0643
2><< D=8C84B
B
0=3
78BC>A820;;H
D=34AB4AE43
0A40B



!


8B2>DA064
+=740;C7H
+B4B
*74
8CH
B7>D;3
38B2>DA064
C 74
4BC01;8B7<4=C
>5
=4F
3A8E4C7A>D67
A4BC0DA0=CB
0;2>7>;
?4A<8CB
5>A
>55B8C4
B0;4B
0=3
C>1022>
B0;4B
?>8=CB
=40A
5>>3
34B4ACB
B27>>;B
0=3
?434BCA80=
?A8>A8CH
0A40B



>0;

(
;8<0C4
;4034AB78?
0=3
1>;3
02C8>=
C>
02784E4
20A1>=
=4DCA0;8CH
1H



066A4BB8E4;H
A43D24
4<8BB8>=B
1H



0=3
8=2A40B4
2;8<0C4
A4B8;84=24
2><<D=8CHF834



(

><<D=8CHF834

(43D2C8>=
*74
8CH
B70;;
8<?;4<4=C
C74
;8<0C4
2C8>=
0=3
30?C0C8>=
&;0=
&
0
@D0;85 843
6A44=7>DB4
60B



A43D2C 8>=
?;0=
C70C
<44CB
C74

A4@D8A4<4=CB
>5
C74
0;85>A=80

=E8A>=<4=C0;
'D0;8CH
2C

'

D834;8=4B


 1
C>

A43D24
2><<D=8CH
0=3
<D=828?0;
4<8BB8>=B
2>=B8BC4=C
F8C7
C74
BC0C4’B

A43D2C8>=
6>0;B





DB8=4BB
CCA02C8>=
0=3

G?0=B8>=
*74
8CH
B7>D;3
4=340E>A
C>
5>2DB
1DB8=4BB
0CCA02C8>=
0=3
A4C4= C8>=
4G?0=B8>=
455>ACB
>=
4<4A68=6
8=3DBCA8 4B
8=
C74
A468>=
C70C
34<>=BCA0C4
BCA>=6
6A>FC7
?>C4=C80;
0=3
?0H
78674A
C70=
0E4A064
F064B



D838=6
&A8=28?;4


>=24=CA0C4
=4F
6A>FC7
F8C78=
)02A0<4=C>’B
4G8BC8=6
5>>C?A8=C
C>
?A><>C4
0
2><?02C
34E4;>?<4=C
?0CC4A=
C70C
BD??>ACB
4558284=C
34;8E4AH
>5
?D1;82
B4AE824B
0=3
8=5A0BCAD2CDA4
F78;4
?A>C42C8=6
BDAA>D=38=6
>?4=
B?024
;0=3B




D838=6
&A8=28?;4


"8=:
=4F
6A>FC7
F8C7
0224BB
C>
78675A4@D4=2H
CA0=B8C
8=
>A34A
C>
>?C8<8I4
?D1;82
8=E4BC<4=CB
0=3
BD??>AC
0=
0224BB81;4
2>=E4=84=C
=4CF>A:
C70C
>554AB
0
E801;4
0;C4A=0C8E4
C>
C74
0DC><>18;4
0=3
?A><>C4B
?D1;82
740;C7
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

34 


D838=6
&A8=28?;4

#0:4
)02A0<4=C>
0
<>34;
>5
BDBC08=01;4
;8E 8=6
1H
?A><>C8=6
4=E8A>=<4=C0;;H
2>=B28>DB
740;C7
?A><>C8=6
0=3
0645A84=3;H
34B86=
>5
1D8;38=6B
?0A:B
0=3
8=5A0BCAD2CDA4
0B
F4;;
0B
1H
?A><>C8=6
C74
030?C8E4
A4DB4
>5
4G8BC8=6
1D8;38=6B
0=3
C74
20A45D;
2>=B4AE0C8>=
>5
4=4A6H
F0C4A
>?4=
B?024B
CA44B
0=3
>C74A
=0CDA0;
A4B>DA24B



D838=6
&A8=28?;4

*0:4
1>;3
02C8>=
C>
02784E4
20A1>=
=4DCA0; 8CH
1H


0=3
142><4
0

;4038=6
E>824
8=
C74
455>AC
C>
A43D24
6A44=7>DB4
60B
4<8BB8>=B
0=3
030?C
C>
2;8<0C4
270=64


D838=6
&A8=28?;4


028;8C0C4
C74
DB4
>5
8==>E0C8E4
0??A>0274B
=4F
C427=>;>684B
0=3
42>=><82
34E4;>?<4=C
C>
3A0<0C820;;H
A43D24
?4A
20?8C0
4=4A6H
DB4
F0BC4
0=3
?>;;DC0=CB
*74

(
<DBC
0;B>
14
A4E8B43
C>
A4<>E4
<8B;4038=6
0=3
4AA>=4>DB
2>=B8BC4=2H
0=0;HB8B
5>A
B4E4A0;
8C4<B


>A
4G0<?;4
C74

(
2>=2;D34B
C74
?A>942C
8B
2>=B8BC4=C
F8C7
O"+&


8A?>AC
"0=3
+B4

><?0C818;8CH
*74
8CH
B70;;
F>A:
F8C7
C74
)02A0<4=C>
>D=CH
 8A?>AC
)HBC4<
))
0=3
C74
8A?>AC
"0=3
+B4
><<8BB8>=
"+
C>
4=BDA4
C70C
=4F
34E4;>?<4=C
=40A
C74
0A40’B
08A?>ACB
8B
2><?0C81;4
F8C7
08A?>AC
>?4A0C8 >=B
03>?C43
"+
?>;8284B
0=3
0??;8201;4
8A?>AC
"0=3
+B4
><?0C818;8CH
&;0=BP
1420DB4
O10B43
>=
C74
0=0;HB8B
?A4B4=C43
C7A>D67>DC
C78B
(
C74
?A>?>B43

?A>942C
F>D;3
14
2><?0C81;4
F8C7
08A?>AC
>?4A0C8>=B
03>?C43
"+
?>;8284B
0=3
0??;8201;4
"+
&;0=B P

>F4E4A
C74

(
3>4B
=>C
?A>E834
0=H
<40=8=65D;
4E834=24
C>
BD??>AC
0
;4BB
C70=
B86=85820=C
58=38=6

*74

(
8B
<8B;4038=6
C>
C74
?D1;82
0=3
3428B8>=
<0:4AB
1H
4G2;D38=6
8=5>A<0C8>=
A460A38=6
C74
BC0CDC>A8;H
A4@D8A43
A4E84F
1H
)%
"+

*74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C

A4@D8A4B
0

4=4A0;
&;0=
<4=3<4=C
C>
270=64
C74
;0=3
DB4
34B86=0C8>=
>=
C74
?A>942C
B8C4

&A8>A
C>
C74
0<4=3<4=C
>5
0

4=4A0;
&;0=
C74
"+
B70;;
A4E84F
C74
?;0=
>A38=0=24
>A
A46D;0C8>=
5>A
2>=B8BC4=2H
F8C7
C74
"+&
&+
)42C8>=

1


-78;4
C74
&A>942C
4B2A8?C8>=
>5
C74

(

BC0C4B
C70C
)%

"+
A4E84F
8B
A4@D8A43
8C
8B
4G2;D343
5A><
0=0;HB8B
F8C78=
C78B
B42C8>=

*74

(
<DBC
14
A4E8B43
C>
8=2;D34
0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
0B
C74
?A>942C
3>4B
=>C
2><?;H
F8C7
&+
)42C8>=

1
0=3
C74
01>E4
8CH
>5
)02A0<4=C>

4=4A0;
&;0=
?>;82H



*74

(
0;B>
2>=2;D34B
C70C
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
8B
2>=B8BC4=C
F8C7
O# 
,4782;4
#8;4B

*A0E4;43
,#*
0B
#4CA82
>=B8BC4=C
F8C7
BC0C4
;0F
C74
8CH
B70;;
4E0;D0C4
CA0=B?>AC0C8>=
0;85>A=80

=E8A>=<4=C0;
'D0;8CH
2C

'
8<?02CB
DB8=6
E4782;4
<8;4B
CA0E4;43
>A
>C74A
<4CA82B
0B
34C4A<8=43
1H
C74
8CH
0=3
B70;;
=>C
A4;H
>=
0DC><>18;4
34;0H
0B
34B2A8143
1H
;4E4;
>5
B4AE824
>A
B8<8;0A
<40BDA4B
>5
E4782D;0A
34;0H
0B
0
<40BDA4
>5
4=E8A>=<4=C0;
B86=85820=24
">20;
*A0=B?>AC0C8>=
=0;HB4B
"*
B70;;
2>=C8=D4
C>
14
A4@D8A43
F74=
=424BB0AH
C>
083
8=
2>=38C8>=8=6
?A>942C
4=C8C;4<4=CB
5>A
=44343
>?4A0C8>=0;
8<?A>E4<4=CB P

*74
(
BC0C4B
C70C
1420DB4
OC74

?A>?>B43
?A>942C
3>4B
=>C
8=2;D34
0=H
A4C08;
DB4B
8=
4G24BB
>5
 

B5
*74A45>A4
C74
7867F0H

2><<4A280;
DB4B
0A4
2>=B834A43
C>
14
;>20;B4AE8=6
A4C08;
0=3
2>=B8BC4=C
F8C7
%&(
6D830=24
F>D;3
A4BD;C
8=
0
;4BBC70=B86=85820=C
8<?02C
A4;0C43
C>
,#* P

*78B
0=0;HB8B
4G2;D34B
C74



%0-*362-%
-64368

0%22-2+
%2(
#7)
%2(&33/
!)'8-32
 

#
):-);
,8847(38'%+3:
1)(-%(381)(-%463+6%17%)632%98-'7(3'91)287'%0-*362-%%-643680%2(97)40%22-2+,%2(&33/%=4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

?A>?>B43 7>C4; ;>20C43 >= C74 867F0H ><<4A280; ?0A24;B

*74 ?A>?>B43 7>C4; 8B =>C 0 ;>20; B4AE8=6 DB4 0=3 8B 

B@D0A4 544C *74A45>A4 C78B 0CC4<?C43 4G4<?C8>= 5A>< ,#* 0=0;HB8B 3>4B =>C 0??;H 0=3 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 <DBC 14 <034 0B ?0AC >5 0 A4E8B43 (

*74
(
2>=C8=D4B 1H BC0C8=6 C70C OC74 >=B8C4 8=3DBCA80; DB4B 0A4 0=C828?0C43 C > 64=4A0C4 ,#* 0C


?4A24=C >5 C74 A468>=0; 0E4A064 F7827 8B 01>E4 C74 B86=85820=24 C7A4B7>; 3 4BC01;8B743 5>A C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C *74A45>A4 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F>D;3 14 A4@D8A43 C> 2><?;H F8C7 #8C860C8>= #40BDA4 

 F7827 A4@D8A4B C70C C74 >F=4A
>?4A0C>A >5 >=B8C4 8=3DBCA80; 1D8;38=6 ?A4?0A4 0=3
8<?;4<4=C 0 ,#* (43D2C8>= &;0= C> A43D24 ,#* 1H 0C ;40BC

?4A24=C ?A8>A C> C74 24AC85820C4 >5
>22D?0=2H 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7 C74 ,#* # 8C860C8>= #4<>A0=3D< ?A4?0A43 1H C74 8CH’B &D1;82 ->A:B 4?0AC<4=C 5>A C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C P

>F4E4A 8C 8B =>C ?>BB81;4 5>A C74 8CH C> 4=BDA4 C70C ## 

 F8;; A4BD;C 8= A43D243 ,#* 1H ?A>942C 4<?;>H44B 0=3 14 8<?;4< 4=C43 2>=C8=D>DB;H 0C 0;; C8<4B C7A>D67>DC C74 ;854 >5 C74 ?A>942C 0=3 <08=C08=0, # *A 4 3 D 2 C 8 > =C >; 4 B B C70= B86=85820=C ;4E4;B 0C 0;; C8<4B

*74 4558202H >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 <8C860C8>= <40BDA4B 0=3 A43D2C8>= >5 ,#* 8<?02CB 14;>F C74 0??;8201;4 C7A4B7>;3B 20==>C 14 0BBDA43 0=3 C74 ?A>942CRB ,#* 8<?02C 8B C74A45>A4 2>=B834A43 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4

 A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 0
58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 1420DB4 C74A4 8B => ?>BB81;4 0BBDA0=24 >5 C74 ?4A2 4=C064 >5 ?A>942C 4<?;>H44B C70C F>D;3 DC8;8I4 =>=0DC><>18;4 >A =>=B8=6;4 >22D?0=C E4782;4 CA0E4; 0BB>280C43 F8C7 C74 <8C860C8>= <40BDA4B 0=3 <8C860C8>= >5 C74 ?A>942CRB ,#* 8<?02C C> ;4BBC70= B86=85820=C 8B =>C 540B81;4
*74
( 0;B> 2>=2;D34B C74 ?A>942C 8B 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7 O
(  %?4A0C8>=0;
<8BB8>=B *74 8CH
B70;; A4@D8A4 34E4;>?<4=C ?A>942CB C70C 4G2443 )02A0<4=C> #4CA>?>;8C0=8A 'D0;8CH #0=064<4=C 8BCA82C )#'# A402C8E4 >A60=82 60B (%
 0=3 =8CA>64= >G834 $%. >?4A0C8>=0; C7A4B7>;3B
C> 8=2>A?>A0C4 34B86= >A >?4A0C8>=0; 540CDA4B C70C A43D24 4<8BB8>=B 4@D0;C > ? 4 A 2 4 = C5 A > <C 7 4
;4E4; C70C F>D;3 14 ?A>3D243 1H 0= D=<8C860C43 ?A>942CP 1420DB4 O= '#&F0B ?A4?0A43 0B A4@D8A43 1H #8C860C8>= #40BDA4  
 0=3 8=2;D34B 0;; 540B81;4 <40BDA4B C> A43D24 4<8BB8>=B 3DA8=6 ?A>942C >?4A0C8>=B 8=2;D38=6 C74 ?A>7818C8>= >5 =0CDA0; 60B ?0AC828?0C8>= 8= 0 *# DB4 >5 I4A>4<8BB8>= 5>A:;85CB DB4 >5 I4A> 4<8BB8>= E4782;4B 8= C7A44 ?4A24=C >5 C74 740EH3DCH E4782;4 5;44C 0=3 C74 ?A>E8B8>= >5 ?434BCA80= 0=3 182H2;4 8=5A0BCAD2CDA4 P

*78B 0=0;HB8B 3>4B =>C ?A>E834 0=H 8=5>A<0C8>= A460A38=6 @D0=C8CH >5 <8C860C8>= 0=3 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 <DBC 14 <034 0B ?0AC >5 0 A4E8B43
(
*74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H 8=5>A<0C8>= >A 0=0;HB8B >= C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB



4=4A0; &;0= *01;4

A>FC7 &A>942C8>=B 5>A )02A0<4=C> 



4=4A0; &;0= F8C78= C74

4=4A0; &;0=
( BC0C4B C70C C74 8CH F8;; 033 

9>1B 5A><






*01;4
 8CHF834
D8;3>DC 1H >=24?C A40 BC0C4B C70C C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= F8;; 70E4

 ,8847;;;'-8=3*7%'6%1)283+3:'328)28(%14368%0'(( 0%22-2+2:-6321)28%014%'8
)43687
+49%2('%%4!%'6%1)283


63.)'8
 
 4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

=3DBCA80; 4<?;>H44B 0C 1D8;3>DC *01;4
 8CHF834 D8;3>DC )D<<0AH BC0C4B C70C =3DBCA80;
4<?;>H<4=C 8= C74 4=C8A4 8CH F8;; 8=2A40B4 1H 
9>1B 0C 1D8;3>DC

)8=24 C74 ?A>942C B8C4 8B =>C
;>20C43 F8C78= C74 8=2>A?>A0C43 8CH ;8<8CB >A 8CB )?74A4 >5 =5;D4=24 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C C74A45>A4 A4?A4B4=CB 0= 8=2A40B4 >5 

=4F 4<?;>H44B 01>E4 C74B4 ?A>942C8>=B

$>C01;H C74
??A>?>B43 ?A>942CRB 

4<?;>H44B F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 @D0=C8CH >5 =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H44B 30=C828?0C43 5>A C74 4=C8A4CH >5 C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= 1H

 8C F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 =3DBCA80;
4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 8CH 1H  0=3 8=2A40B4 C>C0; 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 28CH 1H 


*74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H 0=0;HB8B A460A38=6 C74 8CH
4=4A0; &;0=
11D8;3>DC B24=0A8> 8=2;D38=6 0;; 2D<D;0C8E4 34E4;>?<4=C 2>=BCAD2C43 B8=24 03>?C8>= 30??A>E43 ??A>942CB =>C H4C 2>=BCAD2C43 0=3 O?A>942CB 8= C74 ?8?4;8=4 P
 A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C>
8=2;D34 C78B 0=0;HB8B 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 034@D0C4 0=3 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0;

0=0;HB8B 30=3 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 0B C74 ?A>942C F8;; 8=3D24 6A>FC7 8= C74 0A40 0=3 4G2443B C74

4=4A0; &;0= 1D8;3>DC B24=0A8> 5>A C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43+B4 34B86=0C8>= C70C F0B 334E4;>?43
5>A C74 ?DA?>B4 >5 0E>838=6 >A <8C860C8=6 0= 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 45542C A43D24 ,#*

0=3 8<?A>E4
08A @D0;8CH E80 2><?02C <8G43DB4 34E4;>?<4=C
,
)-+*,.
.%*)
*74
( B>DA24B C74
>E4A=>ARB %55824 >5 &;0==8=6 0=3 (4B40A27 %&(

 
'
D834;8=4B
*427=820; 3E8B>AH 8= 8CB ,#* 0=0;HB8B



>A C74 867F0H ><<4A280; DB4B C74
( BC0C4B C70C
022>A38=6 C> %&( OC74 ?>C4=C80; 5>A ,#* 8<?02CB 022>A38=6 C> C78B 0??A>027 78=64B >= F74C74A C74 ?A>942C 20= 14 2>=B834A43 ;>20;B4AE8=6 >A A468>=0; H 0338=6 A4C08; >??>ACD=8C84B F8C78= 4G8BC8=6 =48671>A7>>3B ;>20;B4AE8=6 A4C08; ?A>942CB 20= B7>AC4= CA8?B 0=3 A43D24 >E4A0;; ,#* = 2>=CA0BC A468>=0; 34BC8=0C8>= A4C08; ?A>942CB F>D;3 3A0F 2DBC><4AB 5A> < ;0A64A CA034 0A40B ?>C4=C80;;H BD1BC8CDC8=6 5>A B7>AC4A CA8?B 0=3 8=2A40B8=6 ,#* *74 %&( 6D830=24 BD664BCB C70C 0=H A4C08; ?A>942CB 8=2;D38=6 BC>A4B ;0A64A C70= 


B5 <867C 14 2>=B834A43 A468>=0; B4AE8=6 A4C08;
*74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C 3>4B =>C 8=2;D34 0=H A4C08; DB4B 8= 4G24BB >5  

B5 *74A45>A4 C74 
&+ DB4B 0A4 2>=B834A43 C> 14 ;>20;B4AE8=6 A4C08; 0=3 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7 %&( 6D830=24 F>D;3 A4BD;C 8= 0 ;4BBC70=B86=85820=C 8<?02C A4;0C43 C> ,#* P

>F4E4A C74 ?DA?>B4 >5 C74 %&( *427=820; 3E8B>AH 3>2D<4=C 8B ?DA4;H 03E8B>AH BC0C8=6 8= 8CB 8=CA>3D2C8>= O*74 ?DA?>B4 >5 C78B 3>2D<4=C 8B C> ?A>E834 03E824 0=3 A42><<4=30C8>=B F7827 064=284B 0=3 >C74A 4=C8C84B <0H DB4 0C C748A 38B2A4C8>= *78B 3>2D<4=C 3>4B =>C 0;C4A ;403 064=2H 38B2A4C8>= 8= ?A4?0A8=6 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 3>2D<4=CB BD1942C C> 
' *78B 3>2D<4=C B7>D;3=>C 14 2>=BCAD43 0B
;460; 03E824 P
 3:)6236>7
**-')3*
0%22-2+%2( )7)%6',")',2-'%0(:-736=32:%09%8 -2+"6%274368%8-3214%'87 -2 ,8847346'%+3:')5%(3'7
$")',2-'%0$(:-736=4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

37 *74
%&(
3>2D<4=C
8B
=>C
0
;460;
8=C4A?A4C0C8>=
2>DAC
3428B8>=
>A
0<4=3<4=C
C>
C74
 '
BC0CDC4

C70C
?A>E834B
0
BD1BC8CDC4
C7A4B7>;3
>5
B86=85820=24
#>BC
=>C01;H
C74
(RB
0=0;HB8B
4G2;D34B
C74

?A>?>B43
7>C4;
;>20C43
>=
C74
867F0H
><<4A280;
?0A24;B

*74
?A>?>B43
7>C4;
8B
=>C
0
;>20;
B4AE8=6
DB4
0=3
8B


B@D0A4
544C
*74A45>A4
4E4=
DC8;8I8= 6
C74

(RB
0CC4<?C43
;>682
5>A
0=

4G4<?C8>=
5A><
,#*
0=0;HB8B
3>4B
=>C
0??;H
0=3
0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
<DBC
14
<034
0B
?0AC
>5
0
A4E8B43

(





;C7>D67
C74

(
2>=2;D34B
OC74
>=B8C4
8=3DBCA80;
DB4B
0A4
0=C828?0C43
C>
64=4A0C4
,#*
0C



?4A24=C
>5
C74
A468>=0;
0E4A064
F7827
8B
01>E4
C74
B86=85820=2 4
C7A4B7>;3
4BC01;8B743
5>A
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942CP
8C
70B
BC8;;
D=34AA4?>AC43
C74
@D0=C8CH
>5
,#*
64=4A0C43
1H
C74
?A>942CRB
8=3DBCA80;
DB4B
*74

(
4G2;D34B
CA8?B
<034
1H
<438D<
0=3
740EH
3DCH
CAD2:B
CA08;4AB
5A><
,#*

0=0;HB8B
*74
,#*
0=0;HB8B
A4;84B
D?>=
C74
%&(



'

D834;8=4B
*427=820;
3E8B>AH
0=3

8CB
BC0C4<4=C
C70C
OQE4782;4
<8;4B
CA0E4;43R
A454AB
C>
C74
0<>D=C
0=3
38BC0=24
>5
0DC><>18;4
CA0E4;
0CCA81DC01;4
C>
0
?A>942CP
F74A4
0DC><>18;4
A454AB
C>
?0BB4=64A
E4782;4B
B?4285820;;H
20AB
0=3
;867C
CAD2:BP
F7827
8B
C74
%&(





>5
&(
)42C8>=


 
C>
2>=2;D34
C70C
C74
?A>942C

F8;;
70E4
;4BB
C70=
B86=85820=C
8<?02CB
*74
%&(
3>2D<4=C
8B
=> C
0
;460;
8=C4A?A4C0C8>=
2>DAC
3428B8>=
>A
0<4=3<4=C
C>
C74

'
BC0CDC4
C70C
2;0A8584B
C74
3458=8C8>=
>5
0DC><>18;4

*74
C4A<
O0DC><>18;4P
8B
=>C
3458=43
8=
C74

'
BC0CDC4
0=3
0??;820C8>=
>5
C74
%&(
8=C4A?A4C0C8>=
8B
B?42D;0C8E4
0=3
3>4B
=>C
?A>E834
0=
0=0;HB8B
>5
C74
OF>ABC20B4
B24=0A8>P
5>A
4=E8A>=<4=C0;
8<?02CB

-834B?A403
?D1;82
D=34ABC0=38=6
0=3
?4A24?C8>=
8=3820C4B
C70C
CAD2:B
8=2;D38=6
<438D<
740EH3DCH
CAD2:

CA08;4A
CA8?B
0BB>280C43
F8C7
C74
8=3DB CA80;
=0CDA4
>5
F0A47>DB4
>?4A0C8>=B
0A4
0DC><>18;4B

=

(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43
C>
8=2;D34
0;;
CAD2:

CA08;4A
0=3
>?4A0C8>=0;

34;8E4AH
E0=
02C8E8CH
5>A
@D0=C85843
,#*
0=0;HB8B

*74
>?4A0C8>=0;
=0CDA4
>5
8=3DBCA80; F0A47>DB4

DB4B
8=E>;E4B
7867
A0C4B
>5
CAD2:

CA08;4A
0=3
34;8E4AH
E0=
,#*
3D4
C>
CA0E4;8=6
5A><
;0A64
A468>=0;
38BCA81DC8>=
24=C4AB
C>
B<0;;4A
8=3DBCA80;
?0A:B
0=3
C74=
C>
C7 48A
58=0;
34;8E4AH
34BC8=0C8>=B

%=24
4<?;>H44B
0AA8E4
0C
C74
8=3DBCA80;
1D8;38=6B
5>A
F>A:
C74H
F8; ;
2>=3D2C
C748A
9>1B
1H
3A8E8=6
CAD2:

CA08;4A
34;8E4AH
E0=B
02A>BB
C74
A468>=
0B
?0AC
>5
C74
308;H
>?4A0C8>=B
0B
0
F0A47>DB4
F7827
F8;;
3A0BC820;;H
8=2A40B4
?A>942C64=4A0C43
,#*


*74
?A>942CRB
CAD2:

CA08;4A
34;8E4AH
E0=
02C8E8CH

8B
D=01;4
C>
DC8;8I4
?D1;82
CA0=B8C
>A
02C8E4
CA0=B?>AC0C8>=
0= 3
8C
8B
<8B;4038=6
C>
C74
?D1;82
0=3
3428B8>=
<0:4AB
C>
4G2;D34
C78B
02C8E8CH
5A><
,#*
0=0;HB8B


A4E8B43
(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43
C>

A45;42C
0
@D0=C85843
,#*
0=0;HB8B
C70C
8=2;D34B
0;;
CAD2:

CA08;4A
0=3
34;8E4AH
E0=
02C8E8CH
C>

034@D0C4;H
0=3
022DA0C4;H
0=0;HI4
C74
?>C4=C80;;H
B86=85820=C
?A>942C
CA0=B?>AC0C8>=
8<?02CB



*74

(
?A>E834B

#8C860C8>=
#40BDA4



C>
<8C860C4
8<?02CB
C>
;4BB
C70=
B86=85820=C
;4E4;B


O&A8>A
C>
C74
24AC85820C4
>5
>22D?0=2H
5>A
4027
>=B8C4
8=3DBCA 80;
1D8;38=6
C74
>F=4A >?4A0C>A
>5

4027
1D8;38=6
B70;;
14
A4@D8A43
C>
?A4?0A4
0=3
8<?;4<4=C
0
,#*
(43D2C8>=
&;0=
C70C
8=2;D34B
0
BD558284=C
B4;42C8>=
>5
&%
*A8?
(43D2C8>=
&A>6A0<B
*
C7A>D67
* 
C>
A43D24
,#*
1H

0C
;40BC

?4A24=C
2>=B8BC4=C
F8C7
C74
,#*
#8C860C8>=
#4<>A0= 3D<
?A4?0A43
1H
C74
8CHRB
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

38 &D1;82
->A:B
4?0AC<4=C
5>A
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
B44
??4=38G
'
C>
C74
(
&%
*A8?

(43D2C8>=
&A>6A0<B
*
C7A>D67
*

8=2;D34
<40BDA4B
BD27
0B
8< ?;4<4=C8=6
0
2><<DC4
CA8?
A43D2C8>=
?A>6A0<
0=3
>A
<0A:4C8=6
?A>E838=6
0
A834B70A4
?A>6A 0<
8<?;4<4=C8=6
0
BD1B838I43
>A
38B2>D=C43
CA0=B8C
?A>6A0<
?A>E838=6
4=3>5CA8?
182H2;4
5028;8C84B
?A>E838=6
4<?;>H4A B?>=B>A43
E0=?>>;
?A828=6
F>A:?;024
7>DB8=6
0=3
8<?;4<4=C8=6
4<?;>H44
?0A:8=6
20B7>DC
*74
,#*
(43D2C8>=
&;0=
B70;;
14
BD1<8CC43
C>
C74
8CHRB
4?0AC<4=C
>5
&D1;82
->A:B
0=3
><<D=8CH
4E4;>?<4=C
4?0AC<4=C
5>A
A4E84F
0=3
0??A>E0; P



$>C01;H
C74

(
70B
=>C
?A>E8343
<40=8=65D;
4E834=24
C>
BD??>AC
C74
2>=2;DB8>=
C70C
#8C860C8>=
#40BDA4



F8;;
A43D24
,#*
1H



#8C860C8>=
#40BDA4



8B
D=4=5>A2401;4
<8C860C8>=

8=
E8>;0C8>=
>5

'
K



1


C
8B
=>C
?>BB81;4
5>A
C74
8CH
C>
4=BDA4
C70C
# 8C860C8>=
#40BDA4



F8;;
A4BD;C
8=
A43D243
,#*
1H
?A>942C
4<?;>H44B
0=3
14
8<?;4<4=C43
2>=C8=D>DB;H
0C
0;;
C8<4B
C7A>D67>DC
C74
;854
>5
C74
?A>942C
0=3
<08=C08=
0
,#*
A43D2C8>=
C>
;4BB
C70=
B86=85820=C
;4E4;B
0C
0;;
C8<4B

*74
4558202H
>5
C74
?A>?>B43
<8C860C8>=
<40BDA4B
0=3
A43D2C8>=
>5
,#*
8<?02CB
14;>F
C74
0??;8201;4
C7A4B7>;3B
20==>C
14
0BBDA43
0=3
C74
?A>942CRB
,#*
8<?02C
8B
C74A45>A4
2>=B834A43
B86=85820=C
0=3
D=0E>8301;4


A4E8B43
(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43
C>
8=2;D34
0

58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
1420DB4
C74A4
8B
=>
?>BB81;4
0BBDA0=24
>5
C74
?4A24=C064
>5
?A>942C
4<?;>H44B
C70C
F>D;3
DC8;8I4
=>=0DC><>18;4
>A
=>=B8=6;4
>22D?0=C
E4782;4
CA0E4;
0BB>280C43
F8C7
C74
<8C860C8>=
<40BDA4B
0=3
<8C860C8>=
>5
C74
?A>942CRB
,#*
8<?02C
C>
;4BB
C70=
B86=85820=C
8B
=>C
540B81;4

*74

(
70B
=>C
034@D0C4;H
0=0;HI43
C74
?A>942CRB
?>C4=C80;
C>
BD1BC0=C80;;H
8=2A40B4
70I0A3B
3D4
C>
0
64><4CA82
34B86=
540CDA4
4 6 
B70A?
2DAE4B
>A
30=64A>DB
8=C4AB42C8>=B
>A
8=2><?0C81;4
DB4B
>A
C74
?A>942CRB
?>C4=C80;
C>
A4BD;C
8=
8=034@D0C4
4<4A64=2H
0224BB

*74A4
0A4
=>
4G7818CB
034@D0C4;H
34?82C8=6
C74
0E08;01;4
<0=4DE4A8=6
0=3
@D4D48=6
B?024
5>A
CAD2:B CA08;4AB
0C
C74

8=C4AB42C8>=
>5
C74
?A>942C
3A8E4F0HB
0=3
C74
039024=C
BCA44CB

*74A4
0A4
0;B>
=>
4G7818CB
034@D0C4;H
34?82C8=6
C74
>=B8C4
CDA=8=6
A038DB
0E08;01;4
5>A
CAD2:B
<0=4DE4A8=6
C7A>D67>DC
C74
8=3DBCA80;
B8C4B

$>C01;H
4E4=
C7>D67
C74

G42DC8E4
)D<<0AH
BC0C4B
C70C
C74

(
?A>E834B
0
?A>942CB?428582

0=0;HB8B
?DABD0=C
C>


'

D834;8=4B
)42C8>=




5>A
0;;
0A4 0B
4G24?C
C74
=>=?0AC828?0C8=6

?0A24;B

86DA4

)8C4
&;0=
3>4B
=>C
8=2;D34
0=H
DB45D;
8=5> A<0C8>=
C70C
F>D;3
14
DC8;8I43
5>A
0=0;HB8B
BD27
0B
C74
;>20C8>=
>5
C74
CAD2:

CA08;4A
;>038=6
3>2:B
?0BB4=64A
20A
?0A:8=6
B?024B
0=3
CAD2:

CA08;4A
?0A:8=6
B?024B

;;
>5
C74B4
8C4<B
0A4
=424BB0AH
C>
2>=3D2C
0=H
CH?4
>5
10B82
0=0;HB8B
A460A38=6
64><4CA82
34B86=
540CDA4B
0=3
4<4A64=2H
0224BB
0=3
C7 4
(
8 B
8 = 0 3 4 @ D 0 C 4
0 B
0 =

8=5>A<0C8>=0;
3>2D<4=C
0B
8C
8B
=>C
?>BB81;4
C>
0B24AC08=
0=H
< 40=8=65D;
0=0;HB8B
10B43
D?>=
C74
8=5>A<0C8>=
?A>E8343


A4E8B43

(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43
C>
8=2;D34
0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
3D4
C>
C74B4
B86=85820=C
0=3
D=0E>8301;4
8<?02CB
C70C
70E4
=>C
144=
0=0;HI43



338C8>=0;;H
C74

(
70B
=>C
?A>E8343
0=H
0=0;HB8B
>5
C74
0E08 ;01;4
7>A8I>=C0;
0=3
E4AC820;
B867C
38BC0=24
0C
C74
8=C4AB42C8>=
>5
C74
?A>942C
3A8E4F0HB
0=3
03902 4=C
BCA44CB

)867C
38BC0=24
8B
C74
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

39 2>=C8=D>DB
;4=6C7
>5
BCA44C
07403
E8B81;4
C>
C74
3A8E4A

C
D=B86=0;8I43
8=C4AB42C8>=B
2>A=4A
B867C
38BC0=24
<DBC
?A>E834
0
BD1BC0=C80;;H
2;40A
;8=4
>5
B867C
14CF4 4=
C74
3A8E4A
>5
C74
E4782;4
F08C8=6
>=
C74
<8=>A
A>03
3A8E4F0H
0=3
C74
3A8E4A
>5
0=
0??A>0278=6
E 4782;4


A4E8B43
(
<DBC
14

?A4?0A43
F8C7
0
B867C
38BC0=24
0=0;HB8B
10B43
>=
C74
<4A820=
BB>280C8>=
>5
)C0C4
867F0H
0=3
*A0=B?>AC0C8>=
%558280;B
)*%
)C>??8=6
)867C
8BC0=24
A4@D8A4<4=CB


,*1.$) /%)#
(+
.-

)


%#)%"%
).
,,!0!,-%
'!
)0%,*)(!).
'
$
)#!-

*74

(
?A>E834B
4AA>=4>DB
0=3
<8B;4038=6
0=0;HB8B
>5
C74
?A>?> B43
?A>942C
DC8;8I8=6
D=24AC08=
;0=6D064
*74

(
2;08<B
C70C
O1420DB4
>5
C74
8=3DBCA80;
0=3
2><<4A280;
=0CDA4
>5
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
1D8;3>DC
F>D;3
=>C
38A42C;H
A4BD;C
8=
0=
8=2A40B4
8=
?>?D;0C8>=
>A
2>=BCAD2C8>=
>5
7>DB8=6 P

>F4E4A
C74

(
4G2;D34B
C70C
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
8B
>DCB834
>5
C74
8CHRB
)% 
<40=8=6
C70C
8C
F8;;
A4?A4B4=C
0
<0A:43
8=2A40B4
01>E4
4G8BC8=6
6A>FC7
?A>942C8 >=B

C
8B
2;40A
C70C
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
70B
=>C
?A4E8>DB;H
144=
?;0==43
5>A
DA10=
34E4;>?<4=C
0B
8C
8B
34B86=0C43
5>A
6A82D;CDA0;
DB4B
1H
C74
>D=CH
>5
)02A0<4=C>
0=3
8B
>DCB834
C74
8CH
>5
)02 A0<4=C>RB
)?74A4
>5
=5;D4=24
0A40

338C8>=0;;H

86DA4
 
><<D=8CH
*H?4B
F8C78=
C74

#*&
))
834=C8584B
C74
?A>942C

B8C4
0B
O"0=3
$>C
34=C85843
5>A
4E4;>?<4=C
8=
C74
#*& ))
&;0 ==8=6
&4A8>3P
<40=8=6
C70C
8C

F0B
=>C
8=2;D343
8=
0=H
6A>FC7
5>A420BC8=6
0=3
C74
#*&
))
834= C8584B


6A>FC7
8=
C74B4
0A40B


<?02CB
F8;;
A4BD;C
5A><
34E4;>?<4=C
>5
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
8 =2;D38=6
B86=85820=C
0=3
D=0E>8301;4
2D<D;0C8E4;H
2>=B834A01;4
8<?02CB
C>
4BC74C82B
6A82D;CDA0;
(4B>DA24B
8A
'D0;8CH
0=3

A44=7>DB4

0B

<8BB8>=B

)8=24
C74
?A>942C
B8C4
F0B
=>C
8=2;D343
5>A
0=0;HB8B
0B
0=
4<?;>H<4=C
64=4A0C8=6
DB4
1H
C74
8CH
>D=CH
>A
)% 
8C
8B
A4?A4B4=CB
0=
8=2A40B4
8=

?>?D;0C8>=
0=3
4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC7
C70C
F0B
=>C
022>D=C43
5>A
1H
0=H
064=2H

*74
(
<DBC
14

A4E8B43
C>
8=2;D34
0
58=38=6
>5
B86=85820=24
3D4
C>
C78B
B86=85820=C
0=3
D=0E>8301;4
8<?02C



*74

(
2>=C8=D4B
1H
BC0C8=6
C70C
O-78;4
2>=BCAD2C8>=
>5
C74
? A>?>B43
?A>942C
F>D;3
A4BD;C
8=
0




8=2A40B4
8=
2>=BCAD2C8>=
4<?;>H<4=C
>??>ACD=8C84B
2>=BCAD2C8>=
F>D;3
14
C4<?>A0AH
0=3
9>1B
F>D;3



14
58;;43
1H
C74

4<?;>H44
10B4 P

*74
(
70B
=>C
?A>E8343
0=H

34<>6A0?782
8=5>A<0C8>=
A460A38=6
C74
O;>20;P
4<?;>H44
10B4
0=3
C74
64>6A0?782
1>D=30A84B
>5
C74
O;>20;P
4<?;>H44
10B4
0A4
D=3458=43

*74A4
8B
=>
8=5>A<0C8>=
A460A38=6
C74
0E08;01;4
2>=BCAD2C8>=
F>A:5>A24
0=3
C74

(
70B
=>C
?A>E8343
0=H
<40=8=6 5D;
4E834=24
C>
BD??>AC
C74
2>=2;DB8>=
C74
?A>942C
F8;;
=>C
8=3D24
6A>FC7



*74

(
0;B>
BC0C4B
C70C
O;C7>D67
34E4;>?<4=C
>5
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
2>D;3
64=4A0C4
0
C>C0;
>5
0??A>G8<0C4;H


4<?;>H44B
=4F
4<?;>H44B
F>D;3



14
3A0F=
5A><
2DAA4=C
A4B834=CB







22>A38=6
C>
C74
8CH ’B
?>?D;0C8>=
?A>942C8>=B
0B
?A4B4=C43
8=
*01;4
 
8CH
>5
)02A0<4=C>
&>?D;0C8>=

A>FC7
&A>942C8>=B
8=
70?C4A
 
"0=3
+B4
0=3
&;0==8=6 &>?D;0C8>=

0=3
>DB8=6
>5
C78B

(
C74
?>?D;0C8>=
>5
C74
8CH
>5
)02A0<4=C>
8B
0=C828?0C43
C>
8=2A40B4
5A><

C>



1H



>=B4AE0C8E4;H
4BC8<0C8=6
C70C
0;;
?4A <0=4=C
?>B8C8>=B
0BB>280C43
F8C7
C74
?A>942C
F>D;3
14
58;;43
1H
=4F
A4B834=CB
C>
C74
 



0=3
0BBD<8=6
C70C
C74

Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F>D;3 14 5D;;H 1D8;C >DC 0=3 >?4A0C8=6 0C 5D;; 20?028CH 1H


 C74 ?A>942C ’B
2>=CA81DC8>= C> C74 >E4A0;; ?>?D;0C8>= 8=2A40B4 1H


F>D;3 14 0??A>G8< 0C4;H
 ?4A24=C
*7DB C74 8=2A40B4 8= 9>1B F>D;3 14


  2><?0A43 C> C74 8CH’B 4G8BC8=6 0=3 0=C828?0C43 ?>?D;0C8>= ;4E4;B B BD27 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F>D;3 =>C A4BD;C 8= 0 BD1B C0=C80; 8=2A40B4 8= ?4A<0=4=C ?>?D;0C8>= 0=3 0 34<0=3 5>A 7>DB8=6 8= C74 E828=8CH >5 C74 ?A>942C B8C4 P C <DBC 14 =>C43 C70C C74 ?A>942C B8C4 8B =>C F8C78= C74 8=2>A?>A0C43 8CH ;8<8CB >A C74 8CHRB )?74A4 >5 =5;D4=24 0=3 C74A45>A4 F0B =>C 022>D=C43 5>A F8C78= C74


 A4B834=C C>C0; 0=3 C74 A45>A4 A4?A4B4=CB 0=
8=2A40B4 >5 

=4F A4B834=CB 01>E4 C74

 ?A>942C8>= *74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H A4;4E0=C
0=0;HB8B A460A38=6 C74 8CHRB 4<?;>H<4=C ?A>942C8>=B )8=24 C74 ?A>942CB8C4 F0B =>C 8=2;D343 5>A 0=0;HB8B 0B 0= 4<?;>H<4=C 64=4A0C8=6 DB4 1H C74 8CH >D=CH >A )%  8C 8 B A4?A4B4=CB 0=
8=2A40B4 8= ?>?D;0C8>= 0=3 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 C70C F0B =>C 022>D=C43 5>A 1H0=H 064=2H

*74

( <DBC 14 A4E8B43 C> 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 3D4 C> C78B B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 8<?02C
)02A0<4=C> >D=28; >5
>E4A=<4=CB )%
 03>?C43 C74

#4CA>?>;8C0= *A0=B?>AC0C8>=
&;0=
)DBC08=01;4 ><<D=8C84B )CA0C46H #*&
)) >= $>E4<14A


 


86DA4  
><<D=8CH *H?4B F8C78= C74

#*&
)) 834=C8584B C74 ?A>942C B8C4 0B O"0=3 $>C 34=C85843 5>A 4E4;>?<4=C 8= C74 #*&
)) &;0==8=6 &4A8>3P <40=8=6 C70C 8C F0B =>C 8= 2;D343 8= 0=H 6A>FC7 5>A420BC8=6 0=3 C74 #*&
)) 834=C8584B
6A>FC7 8= C74B4 0A40B

*74 #*&
)) =>C4B C70C
C74
BC01;8B743 ><<D=8C84B 8= C74 )%
A468>= F8;; 033

 9>1B 14CF44=

 




86DA4   ><<D=8CH *H?4B 0=3 *01;4 
)D<<0AH >5
G?42C43 >DB8=6 0=3
<?;>H<4=C

A>FC7 1H ><<D=8CH *H?4 +C8;8I8=6 C74
(RB 20;2D;0C8>= >5 

4<?;> H44B C74 ?A>942C
A4?A4B4=CB 0
 8=2A40B4 01>E4 C74 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 ?A>942C8>=B 5A><

 


F8C78= 0;;
>5 )%
RB
BC01;8B743 ><<D=8C84B

 B8=6;4 ?A>942C 022>D=C8=6 5>A C7 8B 0<>D=C >5 C74 ?A>942C43 4<?;>H<4=C 0=3
>A ?>?D;0C8>= >E4A
 H40AB A4?A4B4=CB 0 B86=85820=C 0<>D=C >5 6A>FC7
 A4E8B43
( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 C78B 0=0;HB8B 0=3 0;B> ?A>E834 0 2D<D;0C8E4 0=0;HB8B 38B2DBB8>= >5 ?A>942CB 0??A>E43 B8=24

 0=3 ?A>942CB O8= C74 ?8?4;8=4P F8C78=
BC01;8B743
><<D=8C84B 8= C74 )%
A468>= C> 34C4A<8=4 85 C74 ?A>942C F8;; 4G2443 )%
RB 4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC7 5>A420BC 5>A C74
BC01;8B743 ><<D=8C84B


338C8>=0;;H C74 A4E8B43
( <DBC 0;B> ?A>E834
34<>6A0?782 0=3 64>6A0?782 8=5>A<0C8>= >= C74 ;>20C8>= >5 @D0;85843 F>A:4AB C> 58;; C74B4 ?>B8C8>=B 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 0=0;HB8B
*74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H 8=5>A<0C8>= >A 0=0;HB8B >= C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB



4=4A0; &;0= *01;4

A>FC7 &A>942C8>=B 5>A )02A0<4=C> 



4=4A0; &;0= F8C78= C74

4=4A0; &;0=
( BC0C4B C70C C74 8CH F8;; 033 

9>1B 5A><






*01;4
 8CHF834
D8;3>DC 1H >=24?C A40 BC0C4B C70C C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= F8;; 70E4

 
&&#%
'''%"
"$
%
&% 
!
%
&&
!&% &#%%#




 ,8847;;;'-8=3*7%'6%1)283+3:'328)28(%14368%0'(( 0%22-2+2:-6321)28%014%'8
)43687
+49%2('%%4!%'6%1)283


63.)'8
 
 4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

=3DBCA80; 4<?;>H44B 0C 1D8;3>DC *01;4
 8CHF834 D8;3>DC )D<<0AH BC0C4B C70C =3DBCA80;
4<?;>H<4=C 8= C74 4=C8A4 8CH F8;; 8=2A40B4 1H 
9>1B 0C 1D8;3>DC

)8=24 C74 ?A>942C B8C4 8B =>C
;>20C43 F8C78= C74 8=2>A?>A0C43 8CH ;8<8CB >A 8CB )?74A4 >5 =5;D4=24 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C C74A45>A4 A4?A4B4=CB 0= 8=2A40B4 >5 

=4F 4<?;>H44B 01>E4 C74B4 ?A>942C8>=B

$>C01;H C74
??A>?>B43 ?A>942CRB 

4<?;>H44B F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 @D0=C8CH >5 =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H44B 30=C828?0C43 5>A C74 4=C8A4CH >5 C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= 1H

 8C F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 =3DBCA80;
4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 8CH 1H  0=3 8=2A40B4 C>C0; 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 28CH 1H 


*74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H 0=0;HB8B A460A38=6 C74 8CH
4=4A0; &;0=
11D8;3>DC B24=0A8> 8=2;D38=6 0;; 2D<D;0C8E4 34E4;>?<4=C 2>=BCAD2C43 B8=24 03>?C8>= 30??A>E43 ??A>942CB =>C H4C 2>=BCAD2C43 0=3 O?A>942CB 8= C74 ?8?4;8=4 P
 A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C>
8=2;D34 C78B 0=0;HB8B 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 034@D0C4 0=3 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0;

0=0;HB8B 30=3 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 0B C74 ?A>942C F8;; 8=3D24 6A>FC7 8= C74 0A40 0=3 4G2443B C74

4=4A0; &;0= 1D8;3>DC B24=0A8> 5>A C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43+B4 34B86=0C8>= C70C F0B 334E4;>?43
5>A C74 ?DA?>B4 >5 0E>838=6 >A <8C860C8=6 0= 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 45542C A43D24 ,#*

0=3 8<?A>E4
08A @D0;8CH E80 2><?02C <8G43DB4 34E4;>?<4=C
*74
( 2>=2;D34B C70C OC74 ?A>942C F>D;3 =>C 14 0=C828?0C43 C> 4;8<8=0C4 0=H >1BC02;4B C> ??>?D;0C8>= 6A>FC7P 1420DB4 OC74 5>A46>8=6 4=C8C;4<4=CB F>D;3 >=;H 0??;H C> C74 ?A>942C B8C4 30=3 F>D;3 =>C 0;;>F 5>A 5DAC74A 4G?0=B8>= >5 C74 8CH 1>D=30A84B >A 0338C8>=0; 34E4;>?<4=C  


 
P

*74
( 70B 4G2;D343 5>A 38B2DBB8>= 5>A C74 ?A42434=24 B4CC8=6 02C8>= C70C 0??A>E0; >5 C74 A4@D8A43 )?74A4 >5 =5;D4=24 <4=3<4=C 4=4A0; &;0= <4=3<4=C 30=3
&A4I>=8=6 B4C 5>A 5DCDA4 270=64B 8= C74 0A40

*74
( <DBC 14 A4E8B43 C> 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 5>5
B86=85820=24 0B C74 A4@D8A43 ) % <4=3<4=C

&
&A4I>=8=6 C> 8<?;4<4=C C74 ?A>942C F8;; A4BD;C
8= B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 2D<D;0C8E4;H 2>=B834A01;4 8<?02CB C> 4BC74C82B 6A82D;CDA0; (4B>DA24B 8A 'D0;8CH 0=3
A44=7>DB4
0B
<8BB8>=B 0=3 0??A>E0; >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F8;;
B4C ?A42434=C 5>A 0??A>E0; >5 >C74A )% <4=3<4=CB

&B 0=3 ?A>942CB F8C7 )+ 8<?02CB C70C
A4@D8A4 270=64B 8= ;0=3 DB4 34B86=0C8>=B *78B 8B 0 ?A42434=CB4CC8=6 02C8>= C70C F8;; 4=2>DA064 0=3 5028;8C0C4 >C74A 02C8E8C84B C70C 2>D;3 B86=85820=C;H 05542C C74 4=E8A>=<4=C

'.!,)
.%0!-
*74
( 8B A4@D8A43 C> 4E0;D0C4 0 A40B>=01;4 A0=64 >5 0;C4A=0C8E4B C> C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F7827 F8;; 0E>83 >A BD1BC0=C80;;H ;4BB4= 0=H >5 C74 B86=85820=C 45542CB >5 C74 ?A>942C  ' K


  
*74 0;C4A=0C8E4B 27>B4= 5>A 0=0;HB8B 8=2;D34 C74 
' A4@D8A43 O$> &A>942C
$> D8;3P 0;C4A=0C8E4
0=3 >=;H CF> >C74AB 

&4A24=C
;42CA82
;44C ;C4A=0C8E4 0=3 (43D243
>>C?A8=C ;C4A=0C8E4
*74
( 3>4B =>C 4E0;D0C4 0 A40B>=01;4 A0=64 >5 0;C4A=0C8E4B 0B >=;H CF> 0;C4A=0C8E4B 14H>=3 C74 A4@D8A43 $> &A>942C 0;C4A=0C8E4 8B 0=0;HI43

*74
( <DBC 14 A4E8B43 C> 8 =2;D34 0=0;HB8B >5 0
A40B>=01;4 A0=64 >5 0;C4A=0C8E4B 0=3 5>BC4A 8=5>A<43 3428B8>= <0:8=6  ' K


  *78B
2>D;3 8=2;D34 0;C4A=0C8E4B BD27 0B 34E4;>?<4=C >5 C74 B8C4 F8C7 0 ?A>942C C70C A43D24B C74 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 4BC74C82B 6A82D;CDA0; (4B>DA24B 8A 'D0;8CH 0=3

8<?02CB C> ;4BB C70=
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025
Page

42 B86=85820=C
;4E4;B
0=3
0
<8G43DB4
?A>942C
C70C
?A>E834B
055>A301;4
7>DB8=6
0=3
;>20;B4AE8=6
2><<4A280;
DB4B
C70C
<0H
A43D24
,#*

4<8BB8>=B
0=3
8<?A>E4
8A
'D0;8CH



*)'/-%*)

>A
C74
5>A46>8=6
A40B>=B

)
!
14;84E4B
C74

(

(
0=3
(4B?>=B4
C>
><<4=CB
0A4
5;0F43

0=3
0
A4E8B43

(
<DBC
14
?A4?0A43
5>A
C74
?A>?>B43
?A>942C
0=3
28A2D;0C43
5>A
?D1;82
A4E84F

>;34=
)C0C4

=E8A>=<4=C0;
!DBC824
;;80=24
A4@D4BCB
C>
14
03343
C>
C74
?D1;82
8=C4A4BC
;8BC
A460A38=6
0=H
BD1B4@D4=C
4=E8A>=<4=C0;
3>2D<4=CB
?D1;82
=>C824B
?D1;82
740A8=6B
0=3
=>C824B
>5
34C4A<8=0C8>=
5>A
C78B
?A>942C
)4=3
0;;
2><<D=820C8>=B
C>
>;34=
)C0C4

=E8A>=<4=C0;
!DBC824

;;80=24
& %
>G


>A>=0








)8=24A4;H

0AH
>

;D<
>;;8=B

>
""&

350 SACRAMENTO, Suite 116 - BREATHE BUILDING, 909 12th St., Sacramento PO Box 16167, Sacramento, CA 95816 − https://350sacramento.org − [email protected]

April 2, 2025

Scott Johnson, Senior Planner
Community Development Department
City of Sacramento
300 Richards Blvd Third Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811

Via email only: [email protected]

Dear Mr. Johnson
AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL FEIR: COMMENTS
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the March 2025 Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) / Sacramento City Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Airport South Industrial Project (ASI). We do not believe that the FEIR adequately responded to previous comments, as follows.
350 Comment 11-11. 350 commented that the DEIR does not address conflicts with specified City GP policies. The FEIR’s response cites to the DEIR, Impact 4.9.3 and Table 4.9.7.

DEIR Impact 4.9.3 asserts, “The determination that the project is consistent or inconsistent with the City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan policies or other City plans and policies is ultimately the decision of the City Council”.

This is unhelpful. Of course, lead agency decision-makers are ultimately responsible for determining project consistency, but it is the responsibility of the EIR to provide them the information needed to inform that decision. This the FEIR fails to do because:
• Cumulative Impacts. Other than now partially acknowledging 350’s concerns as an area of controversy, the EIR ignores the gist of 350 comments 11-1 -11-9 as “not specifically address[ing] the adequacy of the Draft EIR”. Those comments discuss the cumulative and precedential effects of ASI’s proposed over-ride of the County’s “ultimate” USB growth boundary. Breaking the decades-long precedent will certainly facilitate the similar boundary transgressions needed for two major residential projects now pending - Upper West Side and Grandpark, approval of which would involve highly significant environmental impacts. The FEIR fails to acknowledge or substantively respond to that concern,
• Policy Conflicts. Neither DEIR Impact 4.9.3 or Table 4.9.7 cited in the FEIR’s responses to our comments, include reference to the environmentally protective policies identified in 350’s DEIR comment, i.e., LUP 1.1, “conserve open space, reduce vehicle miles traveled, and improve air quality”; and LUP 1-11, “implement conservation plans, preserve farmland and protect critical habitat outside the city”. The DEIR merely states broadly that general plan amendments would be needed to approve the project, without specifying for public and decision-maker review, the environmental policies that the City would have to vacate, failing its informational purpose.

350 Sacramento, April 2, 2025 Page
LAFCO-Sac City, ASI FEIR

2 Response to Comment 13-14. The FEIR response states the ASIP build-put, “could expose sensitive receptors to excess concentrations of DPM … Mitigation Measure 4.3-3… requires completion of a Health Risk Assessment … [and] requires a qualified air quality consultant to identify measures …to reduce… health risks”.

Pursuant to 14 CCR §15126.4(a)(1)(B), proposed Measure 4.3.3 constitutes impermissible deferral of identifying means of mitigation because it does not adopt specific performance standards that the mitigation would achieve; and does not substantiate the feasibility of the proposed mitigation (“relocation of loading docks to further than 1,000 feet from sensitive receptors, electrification of the heavy-duty truck fleet, and/or other options”).

Thank you very much for considering our comments.

Sincerely,

Lesley Cummings
350 Sacramento CAP Team

‘
Oscar Balaguer, Chair
350 Sacramento CAP Team

cc: Liaisons: ECOS, SCC, SCL, Sierra Club,

From: Pete Sheehan
To: Scott Johnson
Cc: Pete Sheehan
Subject: Fw: GSEJA Public Comment Airport South Industrial Project Planning Commission Public Hearing 5-22-25 Date: Monday, May 19, 2025 3:39:52 PM
Attachments: 2024 City of Sacramento Airport South Industrial Project.pdf 2025 GSEJA Airport South Industrial Project .pdf

Subject: GSEJA Public Comment Airport South Industrial Project Planning Commission Public Hearing 5- 22-25

To Whom It May Concern,

Attached and below are public comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. These comments are submitted to the Sacramento Planning Commission to be included for the record regarding the Airport South Industrial Project Public Hearing

For clarification purposes, only the highlighted yellow portion of the body of this email is the public comment to be added into the record along with the TWO attachments.

Please confirm receipt of this email.

Public Comment
Good evening, my name is Pete Sheehan and I’m with the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. We submitted a comment letter to the EIR. Our letter identified several deficiencies with the EIR.

During these turbulent times, we as citizens expect and deserve our local government’s elected and appointed officials to protect us from environmental and social injustice, to aid in the preservation and rehabilitation of the environment in which we all share, and to ensure accountability and responsibility regarding the environmental decisions they may make.

We stand by our comment letter and believe the EIR is flawed, and must be redrafted and recirculated for public review. In closing we call on this commission to be a leader on the aforementioned issues and be the first line of defense for our citizenry and environment. Only by working together can we continue to be excellent stewards of our environment, outstanding stewards to our citizens and each other. Thank You.

Please confirm receipt of this email.

Thank You,

Pete Sheehan

Green Jobs & Clean Communities
ies

May 22, 2025

Sacramento Planning Commission
915 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814

The Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance presented multiple arguments in our comment letter dated July 16, 2024, addressing the flaws of the EIR.

The proposed Project may exacerbate disproportionate health risks for community members within the immediate area, a concern underscored by the mandates of SB 1000. SB 1000, enacted to address environmental justice considerations, require local governments to integrate environmental justice elements into their planning processes, particularly focusing on reducing health risks for communities.

The Sacramento Planning Commission has a duty to adequately address the environmental, social, and economic burden placed on the City of Sacramento residents. The Planning Commission should recommend a new EIR be prepared for this project, due to the deficiencies of the EIR and continued health, exposures, socioeconomic factors and environmental effects the citizenry of the City of Sacramento already suffers and will continue to suffer, based on our comment letter dated July 16, 2024, along with several other comments provided by others participating in the process.

If the Planning Commission votes to recommend certification of the EIR, GSEJA believes the Planning Commission will have not fulfilled its duty to adequately investigate nor mitigate the project.

Further, under CEQA, the Planning Commission must “Take all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise.” The California Environmental Quality Act's purpose in properly applying the law and its intent is defined below by the California Legislature in passing CEQA.

The importance of a healthy environment for all of California’s residents is reflected in CEQA’s purpose. In passing CEQA, the Legislature determined:

CEQA’s Purposes
• “The maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future is a matter of statewide concern.” (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000, subd. (a).) Green Jobs & Clean Communities
ies

• We must “identify any critical thresholds for the health and safety of the people of the state and take all coordinated actions necessary to prevent such thresholds from being reached.” (Id. at subd. (d).)
• “[M]ajor consideration [must be] given to preventing environmental damage, while providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every Californian.” (Id. at subd. (g).)
• We must “[t]ake all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise.” (Pub. Res. Code, § 21001, subd. (b).)

Cities, counties, and other local governmental entities have an important role to play in ensuring environmental justice for all of California’s residents. Under state law: “[E]nvironmental justice” means the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.

Gov. Code, § 65040.12, subd. (e).) Fairness in this context means that the benefits of a healthy environment should be available to everyone, and the burdens of pollution should not be focused on sensitive populations or on communities that already are experiencing its adverse effects.

We encourage the Planning Commission to adopt a net-zero goal for GHG emissions for this project, as other cities have within California with mixed – use projects larger than this one.

CONCLUSION

Due to the above-mentioned reasons as well as the reasons listed in the original comment letter to the EIR, GSEJA believes the EIR is flawed and a new EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. GSEJA requests the Planning Commission to not approve the project and request a new EIR.

Sincerely,

Pete Sheehan

Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance
1265 West Shaw Ave. Suite 100
Fresno, CA 93711

BLUM, COLLINS & HO LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

AON CENTER
707 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
SUITE 4880
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 (213) 572-
0400
July 16, 2024

Scott Johnson VIA EMAIL TO:

Senior Planner [email protected]
Community Development Department
300 Richards Boulevard, Third Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811

Subject: Comments on Airport South Industrial Project EIR (SCH NO. 2022030181)

Dear Mr. Johnson,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Airport South Industrial Project. Please accept and consider these comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. Also, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance formally requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

1.0 Summary

The proposed project would include the development of an industrial park within an approximately 353.5-acre portion of the project site, located immediately south of Bayou Way. The industrial park would allow for construction of up to 5,204,500 square feet (sf) of industrial uses on approximately 235.6 acres, as well as approximately 98,200 sf of retail/highway commercial uses, including approximately 73,400 sf of hotel/hospitality, on approximately 13.4 acres. Throughout the EIR, the term “industrial park” is used as an umbrella term for the proposed industrial and retail/highway commercial uses. Thus, unless a distinction between the proposed industrial and retail/highway commercial uses is specifically defined, the term “industrial park” can be assumed to incorporate both of the foregoing uses.

Parcels 6A through 6C and 7A through 7C are proposed retail/highway commercial uses generally situated south of the intersection of I-5 and Metro Air Parkway. Parcels 1 through 4, all planned for industrial use, generally surround the proposed retail/highway commercial uses. Parcel 5, the remaining proposed industrial use, would be located in the northeast corner of the site. The project Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024
Page2
site also includes several nonparticipating parcels, comprised of approximately 83 acres, and would result in first tier entitlements for future industrial uses of approximately 1,404,800 sf.

Industrial Uses
The total estimated square footage of industrial buildings would be 5,204,500 sf within five parcels totaling 235.6 acres. The area of each of the aforementioned parcels and associated warehouse buildings would be as follows:

Parcel 1: 47.7 acres, 979,400-sf building;
Parcel 2: 53.4 acres, 1,335,200-sf building;
Parcel 3: 34.4 acres, 772,900-sf building;
Parcel 4: 54.7 acres, 1,335,200-sf building; and
Parcel 5: 45.4 acres, 781,800-sf building.

Commercial Uses
The commercial component of the proposed project would include six lots comprised of approximately 98,200 sf of retail/highway commercial uses, including approximately 73,400 sf of hotel/hospitality, on approximately 13.4 acres. All six retail/highway commercial lots would be clustered south of the intersection of I-5 and Metro Air Parkway, near the center of the project site.

The area of each of the aforementioned parcels and associated commercial buildings would be as follows:

Parcel 6A: 2.1 acres, 3,900-sf restaurant building;
Parcel 6B: 1.5 acres, 3,900-sf restaurant building;
Parcel 6C: 3.0 acres, 8,100-sf fueling station/carwash; Parcel 7A: 4.0 acres, 73,400-sf hotel building;
Parcel 7B: 1.5 acres, 3,900-sf restaurant building; and Parcel 7C: 1.3 acres, 5,000-sf restaurant building.

Nonparticipating Parcels
The proposed project includes several nonparticipating parcels comprised of approximately 83 acres, which would receive first-tier entitlements, such as the proposed SOI Amendment to amend the City of Sacramento SOI and Annexation of the site into the City limits and SacSewer service area, for future industrial uses of approximately 1,404,800 sf. These future development areas include six existing parcels controlled by separate owners, which are summarized as follows:

Parcel 8: 64.3 acres (Cayocca);
Parcel 9: 6.5 acres (Campbell);
Parcel 10: 4.6 acres (Isgur Trust); and
Parcel 11: 0.7-acre (Patel).

Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024
Page3
Discretionary actions required to approve the proposed project include:

1. LAFCo approval of a Sphere of Influence (SOI) Amendment to amend the City of Sacramento SOI.

2. LAFCo approval of Annexation of the project site into the City limits and SacSewer service area.

3. City of Sacramento approval of a General Plan Amendment of the City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan to include the boundaries of the industrial park footprint and nonparticipating parcels (total of 414.3 acres – not including roadways) as Employment Mixed-Use.

4. City of Sacramento approval of a Prezoning of 317.9 acres (not including roadways) to M-1- PUD and 13.4 acres (not including roadways) to HC-PUD for the industrial park portion of the site, and 83 acres to M-1 for the nonparticipating parcels.

5. City of Sacramento approval of a PUD (Schematic Plan and PUD Guidelines).

6. City of Sacramento approval of a Tentative Master Parcel Map.

7. City of Sacramento approval of a Development Agreement.

8. City of Sacramento approval of a Finance Plan.

9. County of Sacramento approval of a Property Tax Exchange Agreement.

3.0 Project Description

The EIR does not include a floor plan, detailed site plan, or a conceptual grading plan. The basic components of a Planning Application include a detailed site plan, floor plan, conceptual grading plan, written narrative, and detailed elevations. The site plan provided in Figure 3-3: Site Plan has been edited for public review to remove meaningful information. Figure 3-3 excludes all of the key notes, legend, and important site data such as parking and site coverage. Notably, even though the Executive Summary states that the EIR provides a project-specific analysis pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15161 for all areas except the non-participating parcels, Figure 3-3: Site Plan does not include any useful information that would be utilized for analysis, such as the location of the truck/trailer loading docks, passenger car parking spaces, and truck/trailer parking spaces. All of these basic items are necessary to conduct any type of analysis, and the EIR is inadequate as an informational document as it is not possible to ascertain any meaningful analysis based upon the information provided.

There are also no architectural building elevations provided. The renderings included in Figure

4.1-6 through 4.1-8 do not provide the height of the buildings, paint colors, or building materials.

The EIR has also excluded a grading plan from public review. The EIR states that “Approximately 304,000 cubic yards of soil would be imported during grading,” yet there is no method for the public to verify this claim. Providing the grading plan and earthwork quantity notes is vital as this directly informs the quantity of necessary truck hauling trips due to soil import/export during the Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024
Page4
grading phase of construction. A revised EIR must be prepared to include wholly accurate and unedited detailed floor plan, grading plan, site plan, and project narrative for public review.

Further, the EIR is inadequate as it does not provide detailed information regarding the requests associated with each of the discretionary actions. For example, the EIR briefly lists a few of the requests associated with the M-1 and HC PUD, but has excluded the PUD Schematic Plan and PUD Guidelines from public review. The project also requires discretionary approval of a Tentative Master Parcel Map, Development Agreement, Finance Plan, and Property Tax Exchange Agreement, none of which are included for public review as part of the EIR. This does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Incorporation by reference (CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as the complete PUD Schematic Plan, PUD Guidelines, Tentative Master Parcel Map, Development Agreement, Finance Plan, and Property Tax Exchange Agreement contribute directly to analysis of the problem at hand. A revised EIR must be prepared to include the complete PUD Schematic Plan, PUD Guidelines, Tentative Master Parcel Map, Development Agreement, Finance Plan, and Property Tax Exchange Agreement for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)).

4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials

The EIR states that,“the western portion of the project site is located within Safety Zone 3, which is designated Inner Turning Zone”, the south-central portion of the site is located within Safety Zone 4, which is designated Outer Approach/Departure Zone”, and the eastern portion of the project site is located within Safety Zone 6, which is designated Traffic Pattern Zone”” of the Sacramento International Airport LUCP 1. The EIR concludes the project will have less than significant impacts because, “all future uses would be required to comply with the criteria for conditional uses, as shown in Table 2 of the ALUCP, to ensure safety compatibility with the Sacramento International Airport.” The EIR does not provide any meaningful evidence to support a less than significant finding. The EIR is misleading to the public and decision makers by excluding information regarding the statutorily required review by SACOG ALUC. The proposed project requires a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on the project site.

Prior to the amendment of a General Plan, the ALUC shall review the plan, ordinance, or regulation for consistency with the ALUCP (PUC Section 21676(b)) 2. While the Project Description of the 1 https://www.sacog.org/home/showpublisheddocument/1754/638376327338000000 2 California Airport Planning Land Use Handbook Section 1.3.4. ALUC Review https://dot.ca.gov/- /media/dot-media/programs/aeronautics/documents/californiaairportlanduseplanninghandbook-a11y.pdf Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024
Page5
EIR states that SACOG ALUC review is required, it is excluded from analysis within this section.

The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance as the project does not comply with PUC Section 21676(b).

Notably, the Land Use and Planning analysis states that, “on July 27. 2023, SACOG prepared an ALUC Preliminary Review to determine the proposed project s compatibility with the SMF ALUCP,” and SACOG provided conditions of approval. However, the SACOG ALUC Preliminary Review and conditions of approval are not included for public review, which does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Incorporation by reference (CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as the SACOG ALUC Preliminary Review and conditions of approval contribute directly to analysis of the problem at hand. A revised EIR must be prepared to include the SACOG ALUC Preliminary Review and conditions of approval for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)).

4.9 Land Use and Planning/Population and Housing

It must first be noted that the proposed project is not consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Employment Mixed Use. The City’s General Plan states that the Employment Mixed Use designation, "is intended to buffer residential uses from more intense industrial and service commercial activities and to provide compatible employment uses near higher-density and mixed-use housing. This designation provides for a range of light industrial and high technology uses.” The industrial portion of the project is exclusively warehousing and distribution, which is an intense segment of the broad light industrial category that involves high rates of truck trips. The project is consistent with the Industrial Mixed Use designation, which “provides for manufacturing, warehousing, and other employment-generating uses that may produce loud noise or odors and tend to have a high volume of trucktraffic.” However, the Industrial Mixed Use designation, “should not be located next to a residential neighborhood without substantial buffers (i.e., office uses, regional parks, greenways, or open space),” meaning that it should not be applied to the project site even though it is the appropriate land use designation for the proposed warehousing and distribution aspect of the project. The EIR must be revised to include this information for analysis and include a finding of significance as the proposed project is not consistent with the Employment Mixed Use designation.

Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024
Page6
The project faces significant inconsistencies with statutory requirements of the Housing Crisis Act (HCA) of 2019/Senate Bill (SB) 3303/SB 84. The HCA/SB 330/SB 8 require replacement housing sites when land designated for housing development experience land use changes to ensure no net loss of housing capacity. The EIR states that, “based on the existing Sacramento County General Plan land use and zoning designations for the project site, residential development was not anticipated at the project site.” However, this statement is erroneous and misleading to the public and decision makers and must be replaced with factual information as part of a revised EIR. The project site has an existing Sacramento County Land Use Element designation of Agricultural Cropland5, which “allows single family dwelling units at a density no greater than 40 acres per unit.” Therefore, the 474.4 acre project site has an existing residential development capacity of 11 dwelling units.

Government Code Section 66300(b)(1)(A) requires that agencies shall not change the general plan land use designation, specific plan land use designation, or zoning to a less intensive use below what was allowed under the land use designation and zoning ordinances in effect at the time of the proposed change.” Under Government Code Section 66300(b)(1)(A), a less intensive use” includes, but is not limited to, reductions to height, density, or floor area ratio, new or increased open space or lot size requirements, or new or increased setback requirements, minimum frontage requirements, or maximum lot coverage limitations, or any other action that would individually or cumulatively reduce residential development capacity. Pursuant to SB 330, replacement capacity for any displaced residential units must be provided concurrently at the time of project approval.

Government Code Section 66300 (h)(i)(1) states that, “this section does not prohibit an affected county or an affected city, including the local electorate acting through the initiative process, from changing a land use designation or zoning ordinance to a less intensive use, or reducing the intensity of land use, if the city or county concurrently changes the development standards, policies, and conditions applicable to other parcels within the jurisdiction to ensure that there is no net loss in residential capacity.” As calculated above, the project site’s Sacramento County Land Use Element designation of Agricultural Cropland provides development capacity for 11 residential units. Adoption of the proposed SOI Amendment, General Plan Amendment, and Prezoning as part of the proposed project will result in a reduction of the existing residential development capacity by 11 units to a decreased development capacity of 0 residential units.

3 Housing Crisis Act of 2019/SB 330
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB330 4 SB 8 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB8 5 https://planning.saccounty.gov/Documents/B12.%20Land%20Use%20Element%20Amended%2012-13-

22.pdf
Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024
Page7
This is in conflict with SB 8 that expanded the provisions of the HCA to include Government Code Section 66300 (h)(i)(1) requiring concurrent approval of replacement sites to ensure no net loss in residential capacity, and Section 66300 (h)(2)(A) defining concurrently” to mean the action is approved at the same meeting of the legislative body. The EIR has not identified replacement sites for the net loss in residential capacity for 11 units as a result of project implementation. The loss in residential capacity must be included as a finding of significance as part of a revised EIR. The EIR does not act in conformance with the HCA/SB 330/SB 8 and the lost zoning capacity of any dwelling units is a significant environmental impact in violation of the HCA/SB 330/SB 8. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to this inconsistency.

Additionally, deferring the environmental analysis of construction and operation of replacement sites to a later date is project piecemealing in violation of CEQA. The EIR does not accurately or adequately describe the project, meaning the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment” (CEQA § 15378). The whole of the action must statutorily and legally include the identification of replacement sites and all associated actions required to implement development of at least 11 residential units.

Table 4.9-6 Discussion of Relevant Sacramento LAFCo Policies provides erroneous and misleading consistency analysis. For example, the EIR concludes the project is consistent with “LAFCo Policy I(6): Amendment proposals involving Sphere expansion which contain prime agricultural land will not be approved by the LAFCo if there is sufficient alternative land available for annexation within the existing Sphere of Influence,” by citing analysis that, “an alternate location within the City is not currently available to serve the proposed project,” and “buildout of the site on alternative land outside, but adjacent to, the City s SOI would likely result in similar conversion of Farmland as the proposed project, given the prevalence of agricultural land adjacent to the City s SOI.” The EIR discusses land outside the SOI and land within the incorporated City limits. The EIR has not provided any analysis of the issue identified in Policy I(6), which regards alternative land within the existing Sphere of Influence. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance as it has not provided any meaningful evidence to support a less than significant finding.

The proposed project requests approval of a PUD (Schematic Plan and PUD Guidelines) for the both the M-1 and HC areas. The EIR states that, “the PUD Guidelines developed for the project site include design standards for site design, building design, landscaping, signage, and lighting.” However, the complete PUD guidelines are not included for public review, which does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024
Page8
(CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Incorporation by reference (CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as the complete PUD guidelines contribute directly to analysis of the problem at hand. A revised EIR must be prepared to include the complete PUD guidelines for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)).

The EIR concludes that, “the proposed project would be consistent with the City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan and Planning and Development Code.” However, the EIR has not provided any meaningful evidence to support this claim. For example, the proposed convenience store associated with the gas station/car wash is 8,100 square feet (per Appendix N Traffic Impact Analysis), while Sacramento Municipal Code Section 17.224.410 (HC zone—Permitted uses) limits retail stores to 5,000 square feet in size. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance as the proposed project does not comply with the Sacramento Municipal Code.

The EIR states that, “the determination of significance is based on whether population growth associated with a project has been previously planned for, and whether such growth could result in indirect impacts from associated development.” It is clear that the proposed project has not previously been planned for urban development as it is designated for Agricultural uses by the County of Sacramento and is outside the City of Sacramento’s Sphere of Influence area. Impacts will result from development of the proposed project, including significant and unavoidable cumulatively considerable impacts to Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Since the project site was not included for analysis as an employment generating use by the City, County, or SACOG, it is represents an increase in population and employment growth that was not accounted for by any agency. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to this significant and unavoidable impact.

The EIR also utilizes uncertain language and does not provide any meaningful analysis or supporting evidence to substantiate the conclusion that there will be no significant impacts to population and housing. For example, the EIR states that, "while the project could indirectly attract residents to the area for employment opportunities, new employees would likely be drawn from current residents in the surrounding area,” and the geographic boundaries of the “surrounding area” are undefined. Relying on the entire labor force within an undefined distance, notably the greater SACOG region, to fill the project’s construction and operational jobs will increase rates of VMT and emissions during all phases of construction and operations and an EIR must be prepared to account for longer worker trip distances. This uncertain language is not supported by any information such as the current unemployment rates in the City/County or evidence that the unemployed population is qualified for or interested in work in the industrial sector. The EIR must Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024
Page9
be revised to include a finding of significance as it has not provided any meaningful evidence to support a less than significant finding.

The EIR continues by stating that, "Conservatively estimating that all permanent positions associated with the project would be filled by new residents to the Sacramento region and assuming that the proposed project would be fully built out and operating at full capacity by 2035, the project s contribution to the overall population increase by 2035 would be approximately 3.5 percent (4,000 new residents ÷ 111,515 residents). Thus, the increase in jobs would be relatively small compared to the City s existing and anticipated population levels.” It must be noted that the project site is not within the incorporated City limits or the City’s Sphere of Influence and therefore was not accounted for within the 111,515 resident total, and therefore represents an increase of 4,000 new residents above the 2035 projection. The EIR has not provided any relevant analysis regarding the City’s employment projections. Since the project site was not included for analysis as an employment generating use by the City, County, or SACOG, it is represents an increase in population and employment growth that was not accounted for by any agency. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to this significant and unavoidable impact.

Sacramento Council of Governments (SACOG) adopted the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) on November 18, 2019 6. Figure 3.5:

Community Types within the 2020 MTP/SCS identifies the project site as “Land Not Identified for Development in the MTP/SCS Planning Period,” meaning that it was not included in any growth forecasting and the MTP/SCS identifies 0 growth in these areas. The MTP/SCS notes that the Established Communities in the SACOG region will add 146,053 jobs between 2016 - 2040 (Figure 3.5 Community Types and Table 3.2 Summary of Expected Housing and Employment Growth by Community Type). Utilizing the EIR’s calculation of 4,000 employees, the project represents a 2.7% increase above the employment growth projections from 2016 - 2040 within all of SACOG’s Established Communities. A single project accounting for this amount of the projected employment and/or population over 26 years represents a significant amount of growth.

A revised EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since 2016 and projects “inthe pipeline” within Established Communities in the SACOG region to determine if the project will exceed SACOG’s employment growth forecast for the Established Communities. Additionally, the revised EIR must also provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers to fill these positions in order to provide an accurate environmental analysis.

Table 4.9-7 City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan and SMF Land Use Compatibility Plan Policy Discussion does not provide a consistency analysis with all plans, policies, or regulations adopted 6 SACOG 2020 MTP/SCS https://www.sacog.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/2020_mtp-scs.pdf?1580330993 Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The project has significant potential to conflict with many of these items applicable to the project site, including but not limited to the following from the City General Plan:

1. Goal LUP-1 A compact urban footprint and sustainable development pattern with infrastructure that supports efficient delivery of public services while protecting surrounding open space lands.

2. LUP-1.1 Compact Urban Footprint. The City shall promote a land- and resource-efficient development pattern and the placement of infrastructure to support efficient delivery of public services and conserve open space, reduce vehicle miles traveled, and improve air quality.

3. LUP-1.8 Jobs-Housing Balance. The City shall encourage a balance between job type, the workforce, and housing development to reduce the negative impacts of long commutes and provide a range of employment opportunities for all city residents.

4. LUP-1.11 Coordinate to Protect Farmland. The City shall continue to work with Sacramento County and other adjacent jurisdictions to implement conservation plans, preserve farmland and protect critical habitat outside the city.

5. LUP-4.6 Compatibility with Adjoining Uses. The City shall ensure that the introduction of higher-intensity mixed-use development along major arterial corridors is compatible with adjacent land uses, particularly residential uses, by requiring features such as the following:

Buildings set back from rear or side yard property lines adjoining single-unit dwelling residential uses; Building heights stepped back from sensitive adjoining uses to maintain appropriate transitions in scale and to minimize impacts to privacy and solar access; Landscaped off-street parking areas, loading areas, and service areas screened from adjacent residential areas to the degree feasible; or Lighting shielded from view and directed downward to minimize impacts on adjacent residential uses.

6. LUP-4.8 Buildings that Engage the Street. The City shall require that buildings be oriented to actively engage and enhance the public realm through techniques such as building orientation, build-to and setback lines, façade articulation, ground-floor transparency, and location of parking.

7. LUP-4.9 Enhanced Pedestrian Environment. The City shall require the design of sidewalks in commercial and mixed-use areas to promote walkability and pedestrian activity, with widths wide enough to provide for free and clear pedestrian use, activation of building frontages with displays, landscaping, and seating areas for cafes and restaurants.

8. LUP-4.11 Shared Parking, Driveways, and Alley Access. The City shall encourage the creation of shared parking areas and shared vehicular driveways for access along arterial Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

corridors to minimize the number of driveways and curb cuts. The City should also encourage the use of adjacent alleys for vehicular access.

9. LUP-4.12 Drive-Through Restaurants. The City shall prohibit new drive-through restaurants within: ½-mile walking distance from the center of an existing light rail station platform or high-frequency transit stop; and ¼-mile walking distance from the center of a proposed light rail station.

10. LUP-4.13 Future-Ready Gas Stations. The City shall prohibit the establishment of new gas stations or the expansion of new fossil fuel infrastructure at existing gas stations unless the project proponent provides 50kW or greater Direct Current Fast Charger (DCFC) electric vehicle charging stations on site at a ratio of at least 1 new charging station per 1 new gas fuel nozzle.

11. Goal LUP-7 Industrial opportunities in suitable locations to provide employment for Sacramento residents and promote inclusive economic growth in the city.

12. LUP-8.5 Development Adjacent to Freeways and Railroad Corridors. The City shall promote high-quality design of buildings along freeway and railway corridors, including promoting techniques such as the following: Requiring extensive landscaping and trees along the freeway fronting elevation in consultation with City staff, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, and Caltrans; Establishing a consistent building line, articulating and modulating building elevations and heights, and varying the use of materials and color to create visual interest; and Including design elements that reduce noise and provide for filtering, ventilation, and exhaust of vehicle air emissions.

13. LUP-8.9 People-Friendly Design. The City shall require people-friendly design to be incorporated into buildings and spaces, including elements and features such as the following:

Human scale, tree-shaded pedestrian passageways; Resting areas; Seating; Gathering places; and Other measures with demonstrated benefits for health and quality of life.

14. LUP-8.10 Responsiveness to Context. The City shall require building and site design that respects and responds to the local context, including use of local materials and plant species where feasible, responsiveness to Sacramento s climate, and consideration of cultural and historic context of Sacramento s neighborhoods, corridors, and centers.

15. LUP-8.11 Neighborhood and Transitions. The City shall ensure that development standards facilitate transitions between areas that border one another so that neighborhoods and districts maintain their own unique qualities.

16. Goal LUP-11 Create built and natural environments within the city that prioritize, support, promote, and embrace social equity, ecological regeneration, responsible resource stewardship, and human health and well-being.

Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

17. LUP-11.8 Construction Processes. The City shall encourage onsite construction processes that reduce environmental harm and support sustainable methods.

18. M-1.15 Improve Walking Connectivity. The City shall require new subdivisions, new multiunit dwelling developments, and new developments along commercial corridors to include well-lit, tree-shaded walkways where feasible, that provide direct links to the public realm or adjacent public destinations such as transit stops and stations, schools, parks, and shopping centers.

19. M-2.16 Shared Parking. Through the development review process, the City shall encourage project applicants proposing duplex, multi-unit, mixed use, and non-residential projects to first explore shared-use of existing parking spaces that can be available for dual uses before proposing to construct new parking facilities.

20. M-3.3 Traffic. The City shall support planning and managing traffic from the perspective of the adjacent uses, using traffic management and traffic calming techniques.

21. M-4.7 Integrated Goods Movement. The City shall work to ensure that the goods movement sector is integrated with the rest of the transportation system in such a way that does not endanger the health and safety of residents and other roadway users.

22. Goal EJ-1 Clean air, water, and soil with no segment of the community disproportionately burdened by environment conditions.

23. EJ-2.9 Urban Agriculture in New Development. The City shall promote rooftop gardens, edible gardens, and other sustainable agricultural landscaping alternatives within multi-unit, commercial, and industrial developments.

24. EJ-2.15 Limit Unhealthy Food Establishments. The City shall explore mechanisms to limit unhealthy food establishments, especially in disadvantaged communities (DACs) and historically underserved areas.

25. EJ-2.16 Discourage Unhealthy Uses. The City should discourage the establishment of new drive-through restaurants, alcohol permits for off-site sales, and tobacco sales points near food deserts, schools, and pedestrian priority areas.

26. Goal ERC-9 Climate leadership and bold action to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045, aggressively reduce emissions by 2030, and increase climate resilience communitywide.

27. ERC-9.1 Communitywide GHG Reduction. The City shall implement the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), a qualified greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction plan that meets the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15183.5(b), to reduce community and municipal emissions consistent with the state s GHG reduction goals.

Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

28. E-1.2 Business Attraction and Expansion. The City should endeavor to focus business attraction and retention/expansion efforts on emerging industries in the region that demonstrate strong growth potential and pay higher than average wages.

29. Guiding Principle 1: Concentrate new growth within Sacramento s existing footprint to promote a compact development pattern that supports efficient delivery of public services and infrastructure, while protecting surrounding open space lands.

30. Guiding Principle 2: Link new growth with access to high-frequency transit in order to optimize public investments and support an accessible, convenient network that offers a viable alternative to the automobile and promotes public health.

31. Guiding Principle 6: Make Sacramento a model of sustainable living by promoting environmentally conscious, health promoting, and age-friendly design of buildings, parks and infrastructure, as well as by promoting the adaptive reuse of existing buildings and the careful conservation of energy, water, open spaces, trees, and other natural resources.

32. Guiding Principle 7: Take bold action to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 and become a leading voice in the effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to climate change.

33. Guiding Principle 9: Facilitate the use of innovative approaches, new technologies, and economic development to dramatically reduce per capita energy use, waste, and pollutants.

The EIR must also be revised to remove misleading and erroneous consistency analysis for several items. For example, the EIR concludes the project is consistent with “LUP-1.13 Airport Land Use Compatibility. The City shall work with the Sacramento County Airport System (SCAS) and the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) to ensure that new development near the area s airports is compatible with airport operations, adopted ALUC policies, and applicable Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans,” because “based on the analysis presented throughout this EIR, the proposed project would be compatible with airport operations, adopted ALUC policies, and applicable ALUC Plans.” However, the EIR does not provide any meaningful evidence to support a less than significant finding. The EIR is misleading to the public and decision makers by excluding information regarding the statutorily required review by SACOG ALUC. The proposed project requires a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on the project site. Prior to the amendment of a General Plan, the ALUC shall review the plan, ordinance, or regulation for consistency with the ALUCP (PUC Section 21676(b))7. While the Project Description of the EIR states that SACOG ALUC review is required, it is excluded from analysis within this section. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance as the project does not comply with PUC Section 21676(b) and the above City of Sacramento General Plan policy. 7 California Airport Planning Land Use Handbook Section 1.3.4. ALUC Review https://dot.ca.gov/- /media/dot-media/programs/aeronautics/documents/californiaairportlanduseplanninghandbook-a11y.pdf Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

The EIR also concludes that the proposed project is consistent with, “M-2.3 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as Metric. Consistent with state law, the City shall evaluate transportation California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impacts using vehicle miles traveled or other metrics as determined by the City, and shall not rely on automobile delay, as described by level of service or similar measures of vehicular delay as a measure of environmental significance. Local Transportation Analyses (LTA) shall continue to be required when necessary to aid in conditioning project entitlements for needed operational improvements.” The EIR states that because, “the proposed project does not include any retail uses in excess of 50,000 sf. Therefore, the highway commercial uses are considered to be local-serving retail, and consistent with OPR guidance, would result in a less-than-significant impact related to VMT.” This analysis excludes the proposed hotel located on the Highway Commercial parcels. The proposed hotel is not a local serving use and is 73,400 square feet. Therefore, this attempted exemption from VMT analysis does not apply and a finding of significance must be made as part of a revised EIR. The EIR continues by stating that, “the on-site industrial uses are anticipated to generate VMT at 128 percent of the regional average, which is above the significance threshold established for the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure 4.12-3, which requires that the owner/operator of on-site industrial building prepare and implement a VMT Reduction Plan to reduce VMT by at least 22 percent prior to the certificate of occupancy, consistent with the VMT Mitigation Memorandum prepared by the City s Public Works Department for the proposed project.” However, it is not possible for the City to ensure that MM 4.12-3 will result in reduced VMT by project employees and be implemented continuously, at all times, throughout the life of the project and maintain a VMT reduction to less than significant levels at all times. The efficacy of the proposed mitigation measures and reduction of VMT impacts below the applicable thresholds cannot be assured, and the project’s VMT impact is therefore considered significant and unavoidable. A revised EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance because there is no possible assurance of the percentage of project employees that would utilize non-automobile or non-single occupant vehicle travel associated with the mitigation measures and mitigation of the project’s VMT impact to less than significant is not feasible.

The EIR also concludes the project is consistent with, “ERC-4.7 Operational Emissions. The City shall require development projects that exceed Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) reactive organic gas (ROG) and nitrogen oxide (NOX) operational thresholds to incorporate design or operational features that reduce emissions equal to 15 percent from the level that would be produced by an unmitigated project,” because, “An AQMP was prepared, as required by Mitigation Measure 4.3-2, and includes all feasible measures to reduce emissions during project operations, including the prohibition of natural gas, participation in a TMA, use of Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

zero-emission forklifts, use of zero emission vehicles in three percent of the heavy-duty vehicle fleet, and the provision of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure.” This analysis does not provide any information regarding quantity of mitigation and a finding of significance must be made as part of a revised EIR.

The EIR has not provided any information or analysis on the buildout conditions of the City’s 2040 General Plan.
states that the Employment Mixed Use

4.12 Transportation

The EIR sources the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) 2018 CEQA Guidelines Technical Advisory9 in its VMT analysis. For the Highway Commercial uses, the EIR states that according to OPR, “the potential for VMT impacts, according to this approach, hinges on whether the project can be considered local-serving or regional. By adding retail opportunities within existing neighborhoods, local-serving retail projects can shorten trips and reduce overall VMT. In contrast, regional destination retail projects would draw customers from larger trade areas, potentially substituting for shorter trips and increasing VMT. The OPR guidance suggests that any 8 https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Environmental-Impact- Reports/2040-gpu-and-caap/Sacramento-2040-Project-MEIR-8242023.pdf 9 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA https://opr.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/20190122-743_Technical_Advisory.pdf Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

retail projects, including stores larger than 50,000 sf, might be considered regional serving retail.

The proposed project does not include any retail uses in excess of 50,000 sf. Therefore, the HC- PUD uses are considered to be local-serving retail, and consistent with OPR guidance, would result in a less-than-significant impact related to VMT.” However, the purpose of the OPR Technical Advisory document is purely advisory, stating in its introduction:

“The purpose of this document is to provide advice and recommendations, which agencies and other entities may use at their discretion. This document does not alter lead agency discretion in preparing environmental documents subject to CEQA. This document should not be construed as legal advice.”

The OPR document is not a legal interpretation, court decision, or amendment to the CEQA statute that provides a substitute threshold of significance. Most notably, the EIR’s analysis excludes the proposed hotel located on the Highway Commercial parcels. The proposed hotel is not a local serving use and is 73,400 square feet. Therefore, even utilizing the EIR’s attempted logic for an exemption from VMT analysis does not apply and a finding of significance must be made as part of a revised EIR.

Although the EIR concludes, “the on-site industrial uses are anticipated to generate VMT at 128 percent of the regional average, which is above the significance threshold established for the proposed project,” it has still underreported the quantity of VMT generated by the project’s industrial uses. The EIR excludes trips made by medium and heavy duty trucks/trailers from VMT analysis. The VMT analysis relies upon the OPR 2018 CEQA Guidelines Technical Advisory and its statement that, “‘vehicle miles traveled’ refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project,” where automobile refers to passenger vehicles, specifically cars and light trucks,” (which is the OPR interpretation of PRC Section 15064.3) to conclude that the project will have less than significant impacts. The OPR document is not a legal interpretation, court decision, or amendment to the CEQA statute that clarifies the definition of automobile. The term “automobile” is not defined in the CEQA statute and application of the OPR interpretation is speculative and does not provide an analysis of the “worst-case scenario” for environmental impacts. Widespread public understanding and perception indicates that trucks, including medium/heavy-duty truck/trailer trips associated with the industrial nature of warehouse operations, are automobiles. An EIR must be prepared to include all truck/trailer and operational delivery van activity for quantified VMT analysis. The operational nature of industrial/warehouse uses involves high rates of truck/trailer and delivery van VMT due to traveling from large regional distribution centers to smaller industrial parks and then to their final delivery destinations. Once employees arrive at the industrial buildings for work, they will conduct their jobs by driving truck/trailer/delivery vans across the region as part of the daily operations as a warehouse, which Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

will drastically increase project-generated VMT. The project’s truck/trailer/delivery van activity is unable to utilize public transit or active transportation and it is misleading to the public and decision makers to exclude this activity from VMT analysis. A revised EIR must be prepared to reflect a quantified VMT analysis that includes all truck/trailer and delivery van activity to adequately and accurately analyze the potentially significant project transportation impacts.

The EIR provides Mitigation Measure 4.12-3 to mitigate impacts to less than significant levels:

“Prior to the certificate of occupancy for each on-site industrial building, the owner/operator of each building shall be required to prepare and implement a VMT Reduction Plan that includes a sufficient selection of CAPCOA Trip Reduction Programs (T-6 through T-13) to reduce VMT by at least 22 percent, consistent with the VMT Mitigation Memorandum prepared by the City’s Public Works Department for the proposed project (see Appendix Q to the EIR). CAPCOA Trip Reduction Programs T-6 through T-13 include measures such as implementing a commute trip reduction program and/or marketing, providing a rideshare program, implementing a subsidized or discounted transit program, providing end-of-trip bicycle facilities, providing employer- sponsored vanpool, pricing workplace housing, and implementing employee parking cash-out. The VMT Reduction Plan shall be submitted to the City’s Department of Public Works and Community Development Department for review and approval.”

Notably, the EIR has not provided meaningful evidence to support the conclusion that Mitigation Measure 4.12-3 will reduce VMT by 22%. Mitigation Measure 4.12-3 is unenforceable mitigation in violation of CEQA § 21081.6 (b). It is not possible for the City to ensure that Mitigation Measure 4.12-3 will result in reduced VMT by project employees and be implemented continuously, at all times, throughout the life of the project and maintain a VMT reduction to less than significant levels at all times. The efficacy of the proposed mitigation measures and reduction of VMT impacts below the applicable thresholds cannot be assured, and the project’s VMT impact is therefore considered significant and unavoidable. A revised EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance because there is no possible assurance of the percentage of project employees that would utilize non-automobile or non-single occupant vehicle travel associated with the mitigation measures and mitigation of the project’s VMT impact to less than significant is not feasible.

The EIR has not adequately analyzed the project’s potential to substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses; or the project’s potential to result in inadequate emergency access. There are no exhibits adequately depicting the available maneuvering and queueing space for trucks/trailers at the intersection of the project driveways and the adjacent streets. There are also no exhibits adequately Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

depicting the onsite turning radius available for trucks maneuvering throughout the industrial sites.

Notably, even though the Executive Summary states that the EIR provides a project-specific analysis pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15161 for all areas except the non-participating parcels, Figure 3-3: Site Plan does not include any useful information that would be utilized for analysis, such as the location of the truck/trailer loading docks, passenger car parking spaces, and truck/trailer parking spaces. All of these items are necessary to conduct any type of basic analysis regarding geometric design features and emergency access, and the EIR is inadequate as an informational document as it is not possible to ascertain any meaningful analysis based upon the information provided. A revised EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance due to these significant and unavoidable impacts that have not been analyzed.

Additionally, the EIR has not provided any analysis of the available horizontal and vertical sight distance at the intersection of the project driveways and adjacent streets. Sight distance is the continuous length of street ahead visible to the driver. At unsignalized intersections, corner sight distance must provide a substantially clear line of sight between the driver of the vehicle waiting on the minor road (driveway) and the driver of an approaching vehicle. A revised EIR must be prepared with a sight distance analysis based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Stopping Sight Distance requirements.

6.2 Growth-Inducing Impacts and 6.4 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes

The EIR provides erroneous and misleading analysis of the proposed project utilizing uncertain language. The EIR claims that, “because of the industrial and commercial nature of the proposed project, buildout would not directly result in an increase in population or construction of housing.” However, the EIR excludes that the proposed project is outside of the City’s SOI, meaning that it will represent a marked increase above existing growth projections. It is clear that the proposed project has not previously been planned for urban development as it is designated for Agricultural uses by the County of Sacramento and is outside the City of Sacramento’s Sphere of Influence area. Additionally, Figure 3.5: Community Types within the 2020 MTP/SCS identifies the project site as “Land Not Identified for Development in the MTP/SCS Planning Period,” meaning that it was not included in any growth forecasting and the MTP/SCS identifies 0 growth in these areas.

Impacts will result from development of the proposed project, including significant and unavoidable cumulatively considerable impacts to Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Since the project site was not included for analysis as an employment generating use by the City, County, or SACOG, it is represents an increase in population and employment growth that was not accounted for by any agency. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to this significant and unavoidable impact.

Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

The EIR continues by stating that, “While construction of the proposed project would result in a limited increase in construction employment opportunities, construction would be temporary, and jobs would likely be filled by the local employee base.” The EIR has not provided any demographic information regarding the “local” employee base, and the geographic boundaries of the “local” employee base are undefined. There is no information regarding the available construction workforce and the EIR has not provided any meaningful evidence to support the conclusion the project will not induce growth.

The EIR also states that, “Although development of the proposed project could generate a total of approximately 4,000 employees, new employees would likely be drawn from current residents in the area. According to the City s population projections, as presented in Table 4.9-4, City of Sacramento Population Growth Projections, in Chapter 4.9, Land Use and Planning/Population and Housing, of this EIR, the population of the City of Sacramento is anticipated to increase from 2020 to 2030 by 111,515. Conservatively estimating that all permanent positions associated with the project would be filled by new residents to the Sacramento region and assuming that the proposed project would be fully built out and operating at full capacity by 2030, the project s contribution to the overall population increase by 2030 would be approximately 0.77 percent.

Thus, the increase in jobs would be relatively smallcompared to the City s existing and anticipated population levels. As such, the proposed project would not result in a substantial increase in permanent population and a demand for housing in the vicinity of the project site.” It must be noted that the project site is not within the incorporated City limits or the City’s Sphere of Influence and therefore was not accounted for within the 111,515 resident total, and therefore represents an increase of 4,000 new residents above the 2035 projection. The EIR has not provided any relevant analysis regarding the City’s employment projections. Since the project site was not included for analysis as an employment generating use by the City, County, or SACOG, it is represents an increase in population and employment growth that was not accounted for by any agency. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to this significant and unavoidable impact.

Sacramento Council of Governments (SACOG) adopted the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) on November 18, 2019 10. Figure 3.5:

Community Types within the 2020 MTP/SCS identifies the project site as “Land Not Identified for Development in the MTP/SCS Planning Period,” meaning that it was not included in any growth forecasting and the MTP/SCS identifies 0 growth in these areas. The MTP/SCS notes that the Established Communities in the SACOG region will add 146,053 jobs between 2016 - 2040 (Figure 3.5 Community Types and Table 3.2 Summary of Expected Housing and Employment 10 SACOG 2020 MTP/SCS https://www.sacog.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/2020_mtp-scs.pdf?1580330993 Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024
Page20
Growth by Community Type). Utilizing the EIR’s calculation of 4,000 employees, the project represents a 2.7% increase above the employment growth projections from 2016 - 2040 within all of SACOG’s Established Communities. A single project accounting for this amount of the projected employment and/or population over 26 years represents a significant amount of growth.

A revised EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since 2016 and projects “inthe pipeline” within Established Communities in the SACOG region to determine if the project will exceed SACOG’s employment growth forecast for the Established Communities. Additionally, the revised EIR must also provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers to fill these positions in order to provide an accurate environmental analysis.

The EIR has not provided any information or analysis on the buildout conditions of the City’s 2040 General Plan.
states that the Employment Mixed Use
11 https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Environmental-Impact- Reports/2040-gpu-and-caap/Sacramento-2040-Project-MEIR-8242023.pdf Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024
Page21

7.0 Alternatives
The EIR is required to evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project which will avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project (CEQA § 15126.6.) The alternatives chosen for analysis include the CEQA required “No Project/No Build” alternative and only two others - 20 Percent Electric Fleet Alternative and Reduced Footprint Alternative.

The EIR does not evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives as only two alternatives beyond the required No Project alternative is analyzed. The EIR must be revised to include analysis of a reasonable range of alternatives and foster informed decision making (CEQA § 15126.6). This could include alternatives such as development of the site with a project that reduces the significant and unavoidable Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, and GHG impacts to less than significant levels and a mixed-use project that provides affordable housing and local-serving commercial uses that may reduce VMT, GHG emissions, and improve Air Quality.

Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the EIR is flawed and a revised EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

Sincerely,
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
Attachments:

1. SWAPE Technical Analysis
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
July 12, 2024
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 4880
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on the Airport South Industrial Project (SCH No. 2022030181) Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the 2024 Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) for the Airport South Industrial Project (“Project”) located in the City of Sacramento (“City”). The Project proposes to construct 5,204,500-square-feet (“SF”) of industrial space, 98,200-SF of commercial space, and 3,670 vehicle parking stalls on the 353.5-acre site.

Our review concludes that the DEIR fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s air quality and health risk impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project may be underestimated and inadequately addressed. A revised Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts that the project may have on the environment.

Air Quality
Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The DEIR’s air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with the California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) Version 2020.4.0 (p. 4.3-37). 1 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project-specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence. 1 “CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide.

2 Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose which parameters are used in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions by identifying any changes to default values.

Justifications are provided for each altered value.

When reviewing the Project’s CalEEMod output files, provided in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Modeling Results as Appendix C to the DEIR, we analyzed the “ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation” model. This is the DEIR’s most conservative proposal of the Project, as the model both omits the potential development of the specified nonparticipating-parcels and includes Tier 4 mitigation Still, we found that several model inputs were not consistent with information disclosed in the DEIR. As a result, the Project’s construction emissions may be underestimated. A revised EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction of the Project will have on local and regional air quality.

Underestimated Land Use Size
Regarding the Project’s commercial space, the DEIR states:
“The commercial component of the proposed project would include six lots comprised of approximately 98,200 sf of retail/highway commercial uses, including approximately 73,400 sf of hotel/hospitality, on approximately 13.4 acres” (p. 3-8).

The model should have consequently included 73,400-SF of “Hotel” space. However, review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation” model includes only 73.40-SF of “Hotel” (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 1166, 1220, 1267).

The proposed manufacturing space is therefore underestimated by 73,326.60-SF. 2 This underestimation presents an issue, as the land use size feature is used throughout CalEEMod to determine default variable and emission factors that affect the model’s calculations. The square footage of each land use is used for certain calculations such as determining the wall space to be painted (i.e., volatile organic compounds emissions from architectural coatings) and volume that is heated or cooled (i.e., energy impacts).3 By underestimating the size of the proposed manufacturing space, the model underestimates 2 Calculated: (73,400-SF proposed manufacturing space) – (73.40-SF modeled manufacturing space) = 73,326.60 underestimated floor area.
3 “CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 28.

3 the Project’s construction and operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that “ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation” model includes several changes to the default individual construction phase lengths (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 1167, 1168, 1221, 1222, 1268, 1269).

As a result of these changes, the model includes the following construction schedule (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 1174, 1175, 1227, 1228, 1274, 1275).

The site preparation phase is therefore decreased by 72%, from the default value of 180 to 50 days; the grading phase is decreased by 35%, from the default value of 465 to 300 days; the building construction phase is decreased by 78%, from the default value of 4,650 to 1,000 days; the architectural coating phase is increased by 203%, from the default value of 330 to 1,000 days; and the paving phase is decreased by 85%, from the default value of 330 to 50 days. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified. 4 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is:
“Phase timing adjusted per applicant-provided questionnaire” (Appendix C, pp. 1166, 1220, 1267).

Regarding construction activities, the DEIR states:
“The construction modeling for the Proposed Project Scenario assumes the following based on applicant-provided project-specific data:
4 “CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14.

4 •Construction would begin in the year 2023;
•Construction would occur over an approximately six-year period; and •Approximately 304,000 cubic yards of soil would be imported during grading” (p. 4.3- 38).

However, the changes to the individual construction phase lengths remain unsubstantiated. While the DEIR states that the total length of Project construction would be approximately six years, or 65 months, the DEIR and associated documents fail to mention or justify the changes to individual construction phase lengths. The DEIR and associated documents also fail to provide the purported “applicant- provided questionnaire.” Until the above-mentioned construction schedule is provided, the model should have included proportionately altered individual phase lengths to match the proposed construction duration of 65 months.

The construction schedule included in the model presents an issue, as the construction emissions are improperly spread out over a longer period of time for some phases, but not for others. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide, each construction phase is associated with different emissions activities (see excerpt below). 5
By disproportionately altering and extending some of the individual construction phase lengths without proper justification, the model assumes there are a greater number of days to complete the construction activities required by the prolonged phases. As a result, there will be less construction activities required per day and, consequently, less pollutants emitted per day. Until we are able to verify the revised construction schedule, the models may underestimate the peak daily emissions associated with some phases of construction and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Updated Analysis Indicates Increased Construction-Related ROG Emissions In an effort to more accurately estimate the Project’s construction-related and operational emissions we prepared an updated CalEEMod model, using the Project-specific information provided by the DEIR. In 5 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 32.

5 our updated model we included the correct land use sizes and proportionately altered the construction phase lengths to match the total duration of 65 months. 6 Our analysis estimates that the reactive organic gasses (“ROG”) emissions associated with Project construction would significantly increase from the values calculated in the DEIR’s models (see table below).

SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Construction ROG
(lbs/day)
DEIR 60.6
SWAPE 636.7
% Increase 950%
As demonstrated above, construction-related ROG emissions, as estimated by SWAPE, increase by approximately 950%. While the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (“SMAQMD”) does not currently list a threshold for construction-related ROG emissions, the increase is substantial and the Project could have potential air quality impacts on the environment. 7 As a result, we recommend the incorporation of low-volatile organic compounds (“VOC”) paints to reduce the Project- related ROG emissions.

Failure to Implement All Feasible Mitigation Measures to Reduce Emissions The DEIR claims the Project will result in emissions that exceed the SMAQMD significance threshold for daily and annual ROG and nitrogen oxides (“NO x”) emissions (see excerpt below) (p. 4.3-46, Table 4.3-9). 6 See Attachments A and B for construction calculations and the updated CalEEMod model, respectively. 7 “SMAQMD Thresholds of Significance Table.” SMAQMD, April 2020,available at:
https://www.airquality.org/LandUseTransportation/Documents/CH2ThresholdsTable4-2020.pdf, p. 1. 6 The DEIR consequently implements Mitigation Measure (“MM”) 4.3-2, stating:
“As shown in Table 4.3-10, the proposed project would meet the 35 percent reduction target with implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.3-2, which represents all feasible mitigation.

However, even with a 35 percent reduction, emission levels would still exceed the applicable threshold of significance and, therefore, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable” (DEIR, p. 4.3-47).

While we agree that the implementation of MM 4.3-2 would reduce operational emissions, the Project fails to implementallfeasible mitigation measures. To reduce the Project’s air quality impacts to the maximum extent possible, additional feasible mitigation measures should be incorporated, such as those suggested in the section of this letter titled “Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions.” Consequently, the DEIR’s conclusion that Project’s air quality emissions would be significant- and-unavoidable is unsubstantiated. The Project should not be approved until a revised EIR is prepared, incorporating all feasible mitigation to reduce emissions to less-than-significant levels.

Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The DEIR conducts a health risk assessment (“HRA”) evaluating exposure to diesel particulate matter (“DPM”) emissions from “on-site use of heavy-duty diesel trucks to transport goods” during Project operation (p. 4.3-49). Specifically, the DEIR estimates that, at the maximally exposed receptor, the maximum cancer risk as a result of Project operational heavy-duty diesel trucks would be 9.53 in one million, which would not exceed the SMAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one million (see excerpt below) (p. 4.3-51, Table 4.3-11).

7 Regarding the health risk impacts associated with the Project construction, the DEIR states:
“Because construction equipment on-site would not operate for long periods of time and would be used at varying locations within the sites, associated emissions of DPM would not occur at the same location (or be evenly spread throughout the entire project site) for long periods of time. Due to the temporary nature of construction and the relatively short duration of potential exposure to associated emissions, the potential for any one sensitive receptor in the area to be exposed to concentrations of pollutants for a substantially extended period of time would be low. Therefore, construction associated with the proposed project would not be expected to expose any sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. In addition, it should be noted that due to the temporary nature of construction activities, construction of the proposed project would not result in any worse impacts than what would occur during operations associated with DPM emissions generated by heavy duty truck traffic, as discussed in further detail below. In addition, as discussed above, Mitigation Measure 4.3-1(b) would require the use of cleaner engine construction equipment, such as Tier 4 final equipment, during project construction, which would further help to reduce DPM emissions during construction” (p. 4.3-49 - 50).

As demonstrated above, the DEIR claims that the Project does not require a construction HRA due to its short construction duration and dispersed constriction equipment emissions. However, the DEIR’s evaluation of the Project’s potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for four reasons.

First, the DEIR fails to mention the exposure assumptions for the operational HRA, such as age sensitivity factors (“ASF”) or fraction of time at home (“FAH”) values whatsoever. Until the DEIR substantiates the use of correct exposure assumptions, the HRA may underestimate the cancer risk posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors due to Project operation. Furthermore, according to theRisk Assessment Guidelinesprovided by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the

8 organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, the DEIR’s HRA should have used the following equation: 8
However, the DEIR fails to mention or provide a dose and risk equation to calculate the Project’s operational cancer risks. As such, we cannot verify that the DEIR’s HRA is accurate, and the Project’s cancer risks may be underestimated.

Second, by failing to require a quantified construction HRA, the DEIR is inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to make “a reasonable effort to substantively connect a project’s air quality impacts to likely health consequences.” 9 This poses a problem, as the Project will produce DPM emissions through the exhaust stacks of on-site heavy-duty construction equipment. However, the DEIR fails to evaluate the potential toxic air contaminant (“TAC”) emissions generated from future projects or indicate the concentrations at which such pollutants would trigger adverse health effects. Without making a reasonable effort to connect the DEIR’s construction-related TAC emissions to the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors, the DEIR is inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to correlate the increase in emissions generated by future projects with the potential adverse impacts on human health.

Third, the State of California Department of Justice (“DOJ”) recommends that all warehouse projects prepare a quantitative HRA pursuant to the OEHHA, the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, as well as local air district guidelines. 10 A revised EIR should therefore be prepared to require an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from DPM emissions generated during Project construction and operation.

Fourth, while the DEIR includes a HRA evaluating the health risk impacts to nearby, existing receptors as a result of operation, the DEIR fails to require the evaluation of the combined lifetime cancer risk as a result of construction and operation together. According to OEHHA guidance, “the excess cancer risk is 8 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-7, Equation 8.2.4. 9 “Sierra Club v. County of Fresno.” Supreme Court of California, December 2018, available at:
https://ceqaportal.org/decisions/1907/Sierra%20Club%20v.%20County%20of%20Fresno.pdf. 10 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice,available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/environment/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 6.

9 calculated separately for each age grouping and then summed to yield cancer risk at the receptor location.”11 However, the DEIR fails to require the summing of each age bin to evaluate the combined cancer risk of total construction and operations. This is incorrect, and a revised EIR should be prepared to quantify the entirety of the Project’s construction and operational health risks together and sum them to compare to the above-mentioned SMAQMD threshold of 10 in one million.

Screening-Level Analysis Demonstrates Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model. 12 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (“CAPCOA”) guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments (“HRSAs”). 13, 14 A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach should be conducted prior to approval of the Project.

We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project’s construction-related health risk impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM 10 exhaust estimates from the DEIR’s CalEEMod output files for the “ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation” model. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life. 15 The DEIR’s CalEEMod model indicates that construction activities will generate approximately 1,451 pounds of DPM over the 1,973-day construction period. 16 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation:
 
� = 1,451.0
1,973 × 453.6
 × 1
24ℎ × 1ℎ
3,600 =./
Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00386 grams per second (“g/s”).

Construction was simulated as a 353.5-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN, with approximate dimensions of 1,691- by 846-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of stacks of construction equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical 11 “Guidance Manual for preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015,available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p. 8-4 12 “Air Quality Dispersion Modeling - Screening Models,” U.S. EPA,available at: https://www.epa.gov/scram/air- quality-dispersion-modeling-screening-models.
13 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 14 “Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects.” CAPCOA, July 2009,available at:
http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf. 15 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 16 See Attachment C for health risk calculations.
10 dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release.

An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The population of Sacramento was obtained from U.S. 2022 Census data. 17 The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project Site. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) suggests that the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10% in screening procedures. 18 According to the DEIR the nearest sensitive receptors is Paso Verde K-8 School located adjacent to the Project site (p. 4.11-4). However, according to the AERSCREEN output files, the maximally exposed individual receptor (“MEIR”) was identified at approximately 925 meters from the Project site. The single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 0.2134 µg/m 3 DPM at approximately 925 meters downwind.

Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of

0.02134 µg/m3 for Project construction at the MEIR. 19
We calculated the excess cancer risk using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA.

Specifically, guidance from OEHHA and the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) recommends the use of a standard point estimate approach, including high-point estimate (i.e. 95th percentile) breathing rates and ASF in order to account for the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early-in-life exposure and accurately assess risk for susceptible subpopulations such as children. The residential exposure parameters, such as the daily breathing rates (“BR/BW”), exposure duration (“ED”), ASF, fraction of time at home (“FAH”), and exposure frequency (“EF”) utilized for the various age groups in our screening-level HRA are as follows:
17 “Sacramento.” U.S. Census Bureau, 2022,available at: https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0664000. 18 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” U.S. EPA, October 1992,available at:https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/documents/epa-454r-92-019_ocr.pdf . 19 See Attachment D for AERSCREEN output files.
11 Exposure Assumptions for Residential Individual Cancer Risk Age Group
Breathing
Rate
(L/kg-day)20
Age
Sensitivity
Factor21
Exposure
Duration
(years)
Fraction of
Time at
Home22
Exposure
Frequency
(days/year)23
Exposure
Time
(hours/day)
3rd Trimester 361 10 0.25 1 350 24
Infant (0 - 2) 1090 10 2 1 350 24
Child (2 - 16) 572 3 14 1 350 24
Adult (16 - 30) 261 1 14 0.73 350 24
For the inhalation pathway, the procedure requires the incorporation of several discrete variates to effectively quantify dose for each age group. Once determined, contaminant dose is multiplied by the cancer potency factor (“CPF”) in units of inverse dose expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day-1) to derive the cancer risk estimate. Therefore, to assess exposures, we utilized the following dose algorithm:
, =  ×× 
 ××
where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group Cair = concentration of contaminant in air (μg/m3)
EF = exposure frequency (number of days/365 days)
BR/BW = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg/day) A = inhalation absorption factor (default = 1)
CF = conversion factor (1x10-6,μg to mg, L to m3)
To calculate the overall cancer risk, we used the following equation for each appropriate age group:
 =  ×××× 

20 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and Assessment Act.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk- assessment/ab-2588-supplemental-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 19; see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 21 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-5 Table 8.3. 22 “Risk Assessment Procedures.” SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures_2017_080717.pdf, p. 7. 23 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 5-24. 12 where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group CPF = cancer potency factor, chemical-specific (mg/kg/day) -1 ASF = age sensitivity factor, per age group
FAH = fraction of time at home, per age group (for residential receptors only) ED = exposure duration (years)
AT = averaging time period over which exposure duration is averaged (always 70 years) Consistent with the 1,973-day construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years), infantile stage of life (0 – 2 years), and first 3.16 years of the child stage of life (2 – 16 years). The results of our calculations are shown in the table below.

The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Age Group Emissions Source Duration(years) Concentration (ug/m3) Cancer Risk
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.0213 2.47E-07
Infant (0 - 2) Construction 2 0.0213 5.96E-06
Construction 3.16 0.0213 1.25E-06
Operation 10.84 * *
Child (2 - 16) Total 14 1.25E-06
Adult (16 - 30) Operation 14 * *
Lifetime 30 7.46E-06
The excess cancer risks to the 3 rd trimester of pregnancy, infant and child receptors at the MEIR located approximately 925 meters away, over the course of Project construction, are approximately 0.247, 5.96, and 1.25 in one million, respectively. The total excess cancer risk associated with Project construction is approximately 7.46 in one million. When summing the Project’s construction-related cancer risk, as estimated by SWAPE, with the DEIR’s operational cancer risk of 9.53 in one million, we estimate an excess cancer risk of approximately 16.99 in one million over the course of a 30-year residential lifetime (p. 4.3-51, Table 4.3-11). 24 The lifetime cancer risk exceeds the SMAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the DEIR. 24 Calculated: 7.46 in one million + 9.53 in one million = 16.99 in one million. 13 An agency must include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project’s emissions with the health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. The purpose of the screening-level HRA is to demonstrate the link between Project-generated emissions and potential adverse health risk impacts.

According to the U.S. EPA:
“EPA’s Exposure Assessment Guidelines recommend completing exposure assessments iteratively using atiered approachto‘strike a balance between the costs of adding detail and refinement to an assessment and the benefits associated with that additional refinement’ (U.S.

EPA, 1992).

In other words, an assessment using basic tools (e.g., simple exposure calculations, default values, rules of thumb, conservative assumptions) can be conducted as the first phase (or tier) of the overall assessment (i.e., a screening-level assessment).

The exposure assessor or risk manager can then determine whether the results of the screening- level assessment warrant further evaluation through refinements of the input data and exposure assumptions or by using more advanced models.” 25 As demonstrated above, screening-level analyses warrant further evaluation in a refined modeling approach. As our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, a revised EIR should be prepared to include a refined health risk analysis which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with Project construction. This is of utmost importance as the proposed Project site is located adjacent to a K- 8 school (p. 4.11-4). The U.S. EPA states:
“Children are at greatest risk from exposure to ozone because their lungs are still developing and they are more likely to be active outdoors when ozone levels are high, which increases their exposure. Children are also more likely than adults to have asthma.” 26 If the refined analysis similarly concludes that the Project would result in a significant health risk impact, then additional mitigation measures should be incorporated to reduce the Project’s potential impacts as described in the “Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions” section of this letter.

Mitigation
Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions According to CEQA Guidelines § 15096(g)(2):
“When an updated EIR has been prepared for a project, the Responsible Agency shall not approve the project as proposed if the agency finds any feasible alternative or feasible 25 “Exposure Assessment Tools by Tiers and Types - Screening-Level and Refined.” U.S. EPA,available at:
https://www.epa.gov/expobox/exposure-assessment-tools-tiers-and-types-screening-level-and-refined. 26 “Health Effects of Ozone Pollution.” U.S. EPA, May 2021,available at: https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone- pollution/health-effects-ozone-pollution.
14 mitigation measures within its powers that would substantially lessen or avoid any significant effect the project would have on the environment.”
The DEIR is consequently required under CEQA to implement all feasible mitigation to reduce the Project’s potential impacts. As demonstrated in the sections above, the Project would result in potentially significant air quality and health risk impacts that should be mitigated further.

First, in order to reduce the ROG emissions associated with Project construction and operation, we recommend the DEIR consider incorporating the following mitigation measure from the DOJ: 27 •Require the use of super compliant, low-VOC paints less than 10 g/L during the architectural coating construction phase and during Project maintenance.

Furthermore, Los Angeles County recommends: 28
•If paints and coatings with VOC content of 0 grams/liter to less than 10 grams/liter cannot be utilized, the developer shall avoid application of architectural coatings during the peak smog season: July, August, and September.

While the Project is not located in Los Angeles County, the use of low-VOC paint and reduced application during affected periods would nonetheless decrease the Project’s significant ROG emissions.

Second, the EPA explains that NO x emissions originate from “motor vehicle internal combustion engines and fossil fuel-fired electric utility and industrial boilers.” In order to reduce the NO x emissions associated with Project operation, we recommend the DEIR consider incorporating several mitigation measures (see list below).

CARB recommends: 29
•Requiring all loading/unloading docks and trailer spaces be equipped with electrical hookups for trucks with transport refrigeration units (TRU) or auxiliary power units; •Requiring all TRUs entering the project-site be plug-in capable; •Including contractual language in tenant lease agreements restricting trucks and support equipment from idling longer thantwominutes while on site; and •Requiring the installing of vegetative walls or other effective barriers that separate loading docks and people living or working nearby.
27 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, September 2022,available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 8 – 10. 28 “Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.” Los Angeles County Housing Element Update Program EIR.

August 2021,available at: https://planning.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Housing_final-peir- mitigation-monitoring.pdf.
29 “Recommended Air Pollution Emission Reduction Measures for Warehouses and Distribution Centers.” CARB, August 2023,available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-08/CARB%20Comments%20- %20NOP%20for%20the%20%20Oak%20Valley%20North%20Project%20DEIR.pdf; Attachment A, p. 5 – 8. 15 The DOJ recommends: 30
•Posting both interior- and exterior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the local air district, and the building manager.

As demonstrated above, we have provided several mitigation measures that would reduce Project- related ROG and NO x emissions developed from the DOJ, CARB, and Los Angeles County. These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation.

A revised EIR should be prepared that includesallfeasible mitigation measures, as well as updated air quality and health risk analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to the maximum extent feasible. The revised EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s potentially significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
30 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, September 2022,available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 8 – 10.

16 Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: Updated Construction Calculations
Attachment B: SWAPE's CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment C: Health Risk Calculations
Attachment D: AERSCREEN Output Files
Attachment E: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment F: Paul Rosenfeld CV
Phase
Default Phase
Length
Construction
Duration %
Construction
Duration
Revised Phase
Length
Site Preparation 180 8336 0.0216 1973 43
Grading 465 8336 0.0558 1973 110
Construction 4650 8336 0.5578 1973 1101
Paving 330 8336 0.0396 1973 78
Architectural Coating 330 8336 0.0396 1973 78
Total Default
Construction
Duration
Revised
Construction
Duration
Start Date 9/1/2023 9/1/2023
End Date 6/28/2046 1/25/2029
Total Days 8336 1973
Construction Schedule Calculations
AttachmentA
ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE's comment on "Underestimated Land Use Size." Construction Phase - See SWAPE's comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths." Grading - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Operational Off-Road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Water Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

1.1 Land Usage
Land UsesSizeMetricLot AcreageFloor Surface AreaPopulation Industrial Park5,204.501000sqft235.60 5,204,500.000
Parking Lot3,670.00Space33.03 1,468,000.000
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru16.701000sqft6.40 16,700.000 Hotel122.00Room4.00 73,400.000
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps20.00Pump3.00 8,100.000

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
6 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days) 3.558

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility CompanySacramento Municipal Utility District
2029 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
357.980.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 1 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied AttachmentB
Table NameColumn NameDefault ValueNew Value
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.003.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.004.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.009.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays330.0078.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 2 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblConstructionPhaseNumDays4,650.001,101.00
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays465.00110.00
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays330.0078.00
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays180.0043.00
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate6/28/20461/25/2029
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate12/17/20436/21/2028
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate2/19/20264/2/2024
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate3/23/204510/9/2028
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate5/9/202410/31/2023
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate3/24/204510/10/2028
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate2/20/20264/3/2024
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate5/10/202411/1/2023
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate12/18/20436/22/2028
tblGradingAcresOfGrading330.00900.00
tblGradingAcresOfGrading64.5075.00
tblGradingMaterialImported0.00304,000.00
tblLandUseLandUseSquareFeet177,144.0073,400.00
tblLandUseLandUseSquareFeet2,823.508,100.00
tblLandUseLotAcreage119.48235.60
tblLandUseLotAcreage0.386.40
tblLandUseLotAcreage4.074.00
tblLandUseLotAcreage0.063.00
tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperDaysPerYear260.00300.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHoursPerDay8.0012.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber0.0095.00 tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 3 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsST_TR322.50101.55
tblVehicleTripsST_TR616.12208.86
tblVehicleTripsST_TR8.197.20
tblVehicleTripsST_TR2.541.94
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR322.50101.55
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR472.58208.86
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR5.957.20
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR1.241.94
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR322.50101.55
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR470.95208.86
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR8.367.20
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR3.371.94
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 4 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Yeartons/yrMT/yr
2023 0.1507 2.5177 1.25186.8700e-
003

1.1979 0.0665 1.2644 0.3814 0.06150.4429 0.0000 655.4433 655.4433 0.07970.0733 679.2811 2024 1.1615 9.8010 10.44620.0491 3.5803 0.1559 3.7362 0.94680.1461 1.0930 0.0000 4,679.257 1 4,679.257
1 0.2356 0.4449 4,817.728
2 2025 1.2871 8.9335 11.64360.0520 3.5726 0.1184 3.6911 0.96980.1117 1.0815 0.0000 4,964.744 4 4,964.744
4 0.1912 0.4347 5,099.074
3 2026 1.2280 8.7465 11.16480.0508 3.5726 0.1169 3.6894 0.96970.1103 1.0800 0.0000 4,863.400 4 4,863.400
4 0.1848 0.4247 4,994.571
6 2027 1.1736 8.5790 10.75580.0496 3.5725 0.1154 3.6879 0.96970.1088 1.0786 0.0000 4,763.591 2 4,763.591
2 0.1789 0.4147 4,891.646
9 2028 19.3960 4.3647 5.83010.0248 1.8111 0.0721 1.8832 0.49090.0677 0.5586 0.0000 2,378.339 2 2,378.339
2 0.1097 0.1933 2,438.685
4 2029 6.0491 0.0163 0.10653.1000e-
004

0.0397 6.4000e-
004

0.0403 0.0106 6.3000e-
004

0.0112 0.0000 30.2151 30.2151 7.2000e-
004

6.5000e-
004

30.4265
Maximum 19.3960 9.8010 11.6436 0.05203.5803 0.1559 3.7362 0.9698 0.14611.0930 0.0000 4,964.744 4 4,964.744
4 0.2356 0.4449 5,099.074
3 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 5 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Yeartons/yrMT/yr
2023 0.0485 1.2982 1.41466.8700e-
003

1.1979 0.0122 1.2101 0.3814 0.01180.3932 0.0000 655.4430 655.4430 0.07970.0733 679.2808 2024 0.9677 7.7341 10.74910.0491 3.5803 0.0587 3.6390 0.94680.0561 1.0029 0.0000 4,679.256 6 4,679.256
6 0.2356 0.4449 4,817.727
7 2025 1.1514 7.5979 11.82310.0520 3.5726 0.0549 3.6275 0.96980.0523 1.0220 0.0000 4,964.744 1 4,964.744
1 0.1912 0.4347 5,099.073
9 2026 1.0924 7.4108 11.34430.0508 3.5726 0.0534 3.6259 0.96970.0508 1.0206 0.0000 4,863.400 0 4,863.400
0 0.1848 0.4247 4,994.571
2 2027 1.0379 7.2433 10.93530.0496 3.5725 0.0519 3.6243 0.96970.0494 1.0191 0.0000 4,763.590 8 4,763.590
8 0.1789 0.4147 4,891.646
5 2028 19.3031 3.4180 6.02140.0248 1.8111 0.0259 1.8370 0.49090.0247 0.5156 0.0000 2,378.338 9 2,378.338
9 0.1097 0.1933 2,438.685
2 2029 6.0478 6.6500e-
003

0.1068 3.1000e-
004

0.0397 1.9000e-
004

0.0399 0.0106 1.8000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 30.2151 30.2151 7.2000e-
004

6.5000e-
004

30.4265
Maximum 19.3031 7.7341 11.8231 0.05203.5803 0.0587 3.6390 0.9698 0.05611.0220 0.0000 4,964.744 1 4,964.744
1 0.2356 0.4449 5,099.073
9 Mitigated Construction
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio-CO2Total CO2CH4N20CO2e
Percent
Reduction

2.62 19.20 -2.34 0.000.00 60.20 2.160.00 59.58 6.760.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 QuarterStart DateEnd DateMaximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-202311-30-20231.67710.7117
2 12-1-20232-29-20243.00781.9581
3 3-1-20245-31-20242.75372.1218
4 6-1-20248-31-20242.62072.2149
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 6 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 5 9-1-202411-30-20242.67192.2704
6 12-1-20242-28-20252.61362.2393
7 3-1-20255-31-20252.55772.1872
8 6-1-20258-31-20252.51822.1477
9 9-1-202511-30-20252.56852.2021
10 12-1-20252-28-20262.53702.1746
11 3-1-20265-31-20262.49522.1247
12 6-1-20268-31-20262.45652.0861
13 9-1-202611-30-20262.50592.1395
14 12-1-20262-28-20272.47832.1159
15 3-1-20275-31-20272.43882.0684
16 6-1-20278-31-20272.40092.0305
17 9-1-202711-30-20272.44952.0830
18 12-1-20272-29-20282.45412.0877
19 3-1-20285-31-20282.39082.0204
20 6-1-20288-31-20280.80750.5200
21 9-1-202811-30-202812.010211.8772
22 12-1-20282-28-202912.773112.7499
Highest12.773112.7499
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 7 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Area 23.2934 1.0400e-
003

0.1150 1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.2388
Energy 0.3956 3.5962 3.02080.0216 0.27330.2733 0.27330.2733 0.0000 15,982.68 05 15,982.68
05 1.1875 0.2066 16,073.93
94 Mobile 4.2243 3.2322 24.64520.0316 3.4330 0.0285 3.4615 0.91740.0266 0.9439 0.0000 3,073.143 6 3,073.143
6 0.3822 0.2389 3,153.880
3 Offroad 1.8573 17.4962 24.23390.0327 0.93660.9366 0.86170.8617 0.0000 2,870.473 4 2,870.473
4 0.9284 0.0000 2,893.682
6 Waste0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 1,362.627
6 0.0000 1,362.627
6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852
2 Water0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 428.7769 980.9625 1,409.739 4 1.5662 0.9434 1,730.031
6 Total 29.7706 24.3256 52.01490.0859 3.4330 1.2389 4.6719 0.91741.1620 2.0793 1,791.404 5 22,907.48
41 24,698.88
86 84.5939 1.3889 27,227.62
49 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 8 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Area 23.2934 1.0400e-
003

0.1150 1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.2388
Energy 0.3956 3.5962 3.02080.0216 0.27330.2733 0.27330.2733 0.0000 15,982.68 05 15,982.68
05 1.1875 0.2066 16,073.93
94 Mobile 4.2243 3.2322 24.64520.0316 3.4330 0.0285 3.4615 0.91740.0266 0.9439 0.0000 3,073.143 6 3,073.143
6 0.3822 0.2389 3,153.880
3 Offroad 1.8573 17.4962 24.23390.0327 0.93660.9366 0.86170.8617 0.0000 2,870.473 4 2,870.473
4 0.9284 0.0000 2,893.682
6 Waste0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 1,362.627
6 0.0000 1,362.627
6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852
2 Water0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 428.7769 980.9625 1,409.739 4 1.5662 0.9434 1,730.031
6 Total 29.7706 24.3256 52.01490.0859 3.4330 1.2389 4.6719 0.91741.1620 2.0793 1,791.404 5 22,907.48
41 24,698.88
86 84.5939 1.3889 27,227.62
49 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase NamePhase TypeStart DateEnd DateNum Days
Week
Num DaysPhase Description
1Site PreparationSite Preparation9/1/2023 10/31/2023543 2GradingGrading11/1/20234/2/20245110
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio-CO2Total CO2CH4N20CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 9 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3Building ConstructionBuilding Construction4/3/20246/21/202851101 4PavingPaving6/22/2028 10/9/2028578
5Architectural CoatingArchitectural Coating 10/10/2028 1/25/2029578 OffRoad Equipment
Phase NameOffroad Equipment TypeAmountUsage HoursHorse PowerLoad Factor Architectural CoatingAir Compressors1 6.00780.48
Building ConstructionCranes1 7.00231 0.29
GradingExcavators28.001580.38
Building ConstructionForklifts38.00890.20
Building ConstructionGenerator Sets1 8.00840.74
GradingGraders1 8.001870.41
PavingPavers28.001300.42
PavingPaving Equipment28.001320.36
PavingRollers28.00800.38
GradingRubber Tired Dozers1 8.002470.40
Site PreparationRubber Tired Dozers38.002470.40
GradingScrapers28.003670.48
Building ConstructionTractors/Loaders/Backhoes37.00970.37 GradingTractors/Loaders/Backhoes28.00970.37
Site PreparationTractors/Loaders/Backhoes48.00970.37
Building ConstructionWelders1 8.00460.45
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 7,954,050; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,651,350; Striped Parking Area:
88,080 (Architectural Coating –sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 75
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 900
Acres of Paving: 33.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 10 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Fugitive Dust0.4282 0.0000 0.4282 0.2178 0.00000.2178 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0572 0.5918 0.39238.2000e-
004

0.0272 0.02720.0250 0.0250 0.0000 71.9190 71.91900.0233 0.0000 72.5005 Total 0.0572 0.5918 0.39238.2000e-
004

0.4282 0.0272 0.4554 0.2178 0.02500.2428 0.0000 71.9190 71.9190 0.02330.0000 72.5005 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Trips and VMT
Phase NameOffroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation718.000.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading820.000.0038,000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction92,843.001,110.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving615.000.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1569.000.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 11 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.1100e-
003

6.9000e-
004

9.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8600e-
003

7.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.2801 2.2801 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3014
Total 1.1100e-
003

6.9000e-
004

9.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8600e-
003

7.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.2801 2.2801 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3014
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Fugitive Dust0.4282 0.0000 0.4282 0.2178 0.00000.2178 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0100 0.0434 0.44878.2000e-
004

1.3300e-
003

1.3300e-
003

1.3300e-
003

1.3300e-
003

0.0000 71.9189 71.9189 0.0233 0.000072.5004
Total 0.0100 0.0434 0.44878.2000e-
004

0.4282 1.3300e-
003

0.4295 0.2178 1.3300e-
003

0.2191 0.0000 71.9189 71.9189 0.02330.0000 72.5004
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 12 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.1100e-
003

6.9000e-
004

9.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8600e-
003

7.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.2801 2.2801 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3014
Total 1.1100e-
003

6.9000e-
004

9.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8600e-
003

7.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.2801 2.2801 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3014
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Fugitive Dust0.6381 0.0000 0.6381 0.1275 0.00000.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0714 0.7421 0.60311.3300e-
003

0.0306 0.03060.0282 0.0282 0.0000 117.2507 117.25070.0379 0.0000 118.1987 Total 0.0714 0.7421 0.60311.3300e-
003

0.6381 0.0306 0.6688 0.1275 0.02820.1556 0.0000 117.2507 117.2507 0.03790.0000 118.1987 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 13 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0198 1.1824 0.23744.6600e-
003

0.1256 8.6200e-
003

0.1342 0.0345 8.2500e-
003

0.0428 0.0000 461.4600 461.4600 0.01840.0732 483.7234
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2300e-
003

7.6000e-
004

0.0100 3.0000e-
005

3.1600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.1700e-
003

8.4000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.6000e-
004

0.0000 2.5335 2.5335 8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.5571
Total 0.0210 1.1831 0.24744.6900e-
003

0.1288 8.6400e-
003

0.1374 0.0354 8.2700e-
003

0.0436 0.0000 463.9934 463.9934 0.01850.0732 486.2805
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Fugitive Dust0.6381 0.0000 0.6381 0.1275 0.00000.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0164 0.0710 0.70951.3300e-
003

2.1800e-
003

2.1800e-
003

2.1800e-
003

2.1800e-
003

0.0000 117.2506 117.2506 0.0379 0.0000 118.1986
Total 0.0164 0.0710 0.70951.3300e-
003

0.6381 2.1800e-
003

0.6403 0.1275 2.1800e-
003

0.1296 0.0000 117.2506 117.2506 0.03790.0000 118.1986
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 14 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0198 1.1824 0.23744.6600e-
003

0.1256 8.6200e-
003

0.1342 0.0345 8.2500e-
003

0.0428 0.0000 461.4600 461.4600 0.01840.0732 483.7234
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2300e-
003

7.6000e-
004

0.0100 3.0000e-
005

3.1600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.1700e-
003

8.4000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.6000e-
004

0.0000 2.5335 2.5335 8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.5571
Total 0.0210 1.1831 0.24744.6900e-
003

0.1288 8.6400e-
003

0.1374 0.0354 8.2700e-
003

0.0436 0.0000 463.9934 463.9934 0.01850.0732 486.2805
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Fugitive Dust0.7104 0.0000 0.7104 0.1672 0.00000.1672 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1078 1.0846 0.92872.0800e-
003

0.0447 0.04470.0412 0.0412 0.0000 182.6404 182.64040.0591 0.0000 184.1171 Total 0.1078 1.0846 0.92872.0800e-
003

0.7104 0.0447 0.7551 0.1672 0.04120.2083 0.0000 182.6404 182.6404 0.05910.0000 184.1171 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 15 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0301 1.7959 0.37127.1200e-
003

0.1957 0.0133 0.2090 0.0538 0.01270.0665 0.0000 705.1967 705.1967 0.02800.1118 739.2201 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e-
003

1.0600e-
003

0.0145 4.0000e-
005

4.9200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

4.9500e-
003

1.3100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.3300e-
003

0.0000 3.8490 3.8490 1.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

3.8831
Total 0.0319 1.7969 0.38587.1600e-
003

0.2006 0.0133 0.2139 0.0551 0.01270.0678 0.0000 709.0457 709.0457 0.02810.1119 743.1032 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Fugitive Dust0.7104 0.0000 0.7104 0.1672 0.00000.1672 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0255 0.1106 1.10552.0800e-
003

3.4000e-
003

3.4000e-
003

3.4000e-
003

3.4000e-
003

0.0000 182.6402 182.6402 0.0591 0.0000 184.1169
Total 0.0255 0.1106 1.10552.0800e-
003

0.7104 3.4000e-
003

0.7138 0.1672 3.4000e-
003

0.1706 0.0000 182.6402 182.6402 0.05910.0000 184.1169
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 16 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0301 1.7959 0.37127.1200e-
003

0.1957 0.0133 0.2090 0.0538 0.01270.0665 0.0000 705.1967 705.1967 0.02800.1118 739.2201 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e-
003

1.0600e-
003

0.0145 4.0000e-
005

4.9200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

4.9500e-
003

1.3100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.3300e-
003

0.0000 3.8490 3.8490 1.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

3.8831
Total 0.0319 1.7969 0.38587.1600e-
003

0.2006 0.0133 0.2139 0.0551 0.01270.0678 0.0000 709.0457 709.0457 0.02810.1119 743.1032 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.1435 1.3108 1.57632.6300e-
003

0.0598 0.05980.0563 0.0563 0.0000 226.0529 226.05290.0535 0.0000 227.3893 Total 0.1435 1.3108 1.57632.6300e-
003

0.0598 0.05980.0563 0.0563 0.0000 226.0529 226.05290.0535 0.0000 227.3893 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 17 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1350 5.1709 1.54100.0202 0.6335 0.0277 0.6612 0.18310.0265 0.2096 0.0000 1,969.119 3 1,969.119
3 0.0481 0.2896 2,056.614
8 Worker 0.7434 0.4378 6.01450.0170 2.0358 0.0104 2.0462 0.54159.5300e- 003

0.5510 0.0000 1,592.398
8 1,592.398
8 0.0469 0.0434 1,606.503
8 Total 0.8784 5.6087 7.55550.0373 2.6693 0.0380 2.7073 0.72460.0360 0.7606 0.0000 3,561.518 1 3,561.518
1 0.0950 0.3330 3,663.118
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.0320 0.2179 1.70242.6300e-
003

3.9800e-
003

3.9800e-
003

3.9800e-
003

3.9800e-
003

0.0000 226.0526 226.0526 0.0535 0.0000 227.3890
Total 0.0320 0.2179 1.70242.6300e-
003

3.9800e-
003

3.9800e-
003

3.9800e-
003

3.9800e-
003

0.0000 226.0526 226.0526 0.0535 0.0000 227.3890
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 18 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1350 5.1709 1.54100.0202 0.6335 0.0277 0.6612 0.18310.0265 0.2096 0.0000 1,969.119 3 1,969.119
3 0.0481 0.2896 2,056.614
8 Worker 0.7434 0.4378 6.01450.0170 2.0358 0.0104 2.0462 0.54159.5300e- 003

0.5510 0.0000 1,592.398
8 1,592.398
8 0.0469 0.0434 1,606.503
8 Total 0.8784 5.6087 7.55550.0373 2.6693 0.0380 2.7073 0.72460.0360 0.7606 0.0000 3,561.518 1 3,561.518
1 0.0950 0.3330 3,663.118
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.09913.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.06890.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.65490.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.09913.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.06890.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.65490.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 19 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1741 6.7805 2.01420.0265 0.8478 0.0363 0.8841 0.24510.0347 0.2798 0.0000 2,582.270 1 2,582.270
1 0.0631 0.3804 2,697.214
5 Worker 0.9345 0.5258 7.53040.0220 2.7249 0.0132 2.7381 0.72470.0122 0.7369 0.0000 2,079.819 4 2,079.819
4 0.0570 0.0543 2,097.426
3 Total 1.1086 7.3062 9.54460.0485 3.5726 0.0496 3.6222 0.96980.0469 1.0167 0.0000 4,662.089 5 4,662.089
5 0.1200 0.4347 4,794.640
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.0428 0.2916 2.27863.5200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331
Total 0.0428 0.2916 2.27863.5200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 20 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1741 6.7805 2.01420.0265 0.8478 0.0363 0.8841 0.24510.0347 0.2798 0.0000 2,582.270 1 2,582.270
1 0.0631 0.3804 2,697.214
5 Worker 0.9345 0.5258 7.53040.0220 2.7249 0.0132 2.7381 0.72470.0122 0.7369 0.0000 2,079.819 4 2,079.819
4 0.0570 0.0543 2,097.426
3 Total 1.1086 7.3062 9.54460.0485 3.5726 0.0496 3.6222 0.96980.0469 1.0167 0.0000 4,662.089 5 4,662.089
5 0.1200 0.4347 4,794.640
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.09913.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.06890.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.65490.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.09913.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.06890.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.65490.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 21 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1680 6.6427 1.97420.0260 0.8477 0.0354 0.8831 0.24500.0339 0.2789 0.0000 2,530.311 1 2,530.311
1 0.0617 0.3735 2,643.157
5 Worker 0.8816 0.4765 7.09160.0213 2.7249 0.0126 2.7375 0.72470.0116 0.7364 0.0000 2,030.434 4 2,030.434
4 0.0520 0.0512 2,046.980
6 Total 1.0496 7.1192 9.06580.0473 3.5726 0.0480 3.6206 0.96970.0455 1.0153 0.0000 4,560.745 5 4,560.745
5 0.1137 0.4247 4,690.138
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.0428 0.2916 2.27863.5200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331
Total 0.0428 0.2916 2.27863.5200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 22 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1680 6.6427 1.97420.0260 0.8477 0.0354 0.8831 0.24500.0339 0.2789 0.0000 2,530.311 1 2,530.311
1 0.0617 0.3735 2,643.157
5 Worker 0.8816 0.4765 7.09160.0213 2.7249 0.0126 2.7375 0.72470.0116 0.7364 0.0000 2,030.434 4 2,030.434
4 0.0520 0.0512 2,046.980
6 Total 1.0496 7.1192 9.06580.0473 3.5726 0.0480 3.6206 0.96970.0455 1.0153 0.0000 4,560.745 5 4,560.745
5 0.1137 0.4247 4,690.138
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.09913.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.06890.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.65490.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.09913.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.06890.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.65490.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 23 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1625 6.5164 1.94000.0254 0.8476 0.0346 0.8822 0.24500.0331 0.2781 0.0000 2,476.063 9 2,476.063
9 0.0601 0.3662 2,586.687
8 Worker 0.8326 0.4353 6.71670.0207 2.7249 0.0119 2.7368 0.72470.0110 0.7357 0.0000 1,984.872 4 1,984.872
4 0.0477 0.0485 2,000.525
6 Total 0.9951 6.9517 8.65670.0461 3.5725 0.0465 3.6190 0.96970.0441 1.0138 0.0000 4,460.936 3 4,460.936
3 0.1078 0.4147 4,587.213
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.0428 0.2916 2.27863.5200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331
Total 0.0428 0.2916 2.27863.5200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

5.3200e-
003

0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 24 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1625 6.5164 1.94000.0254 0.8476 0.0346 0.8822 0.24500.0331 0.2781 0.0000 2,476.063 9 2,476.063
9 0.0601 0.3662 2,586.687
8 Worker 0.8326 0.4353 6.71670.0207 2.7249 0.0119 2.7368 0.72470.0110 0.7357 0.0000 1,984.872 4 1,984.872
4 0.0477 0.0485 2,000.525
6 Total 0.9951 6.9517 8.65670.0461 3.5725 0.0465 3.6190 0.96970.0441 1.0138 0.0000 4,460.936 3 4,460.936
3 0.1078 0.4147 4,587.213
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.0841 0.7669 0.98921.6600e-
003

0.0324 0.03240.0305 0.0305 0.0000 142.6305 142.63050.0335 0.0000 143.4687 Total 0.0841 0.7669 0.98921.6600e-
003

0.0324 0.03240.0305 0.0305 0.0000 142.6305 142.63050.0335 0.0000 143.4687 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 25 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0743 3.0214 0.90130.0117 0.3994 0.0160 0.4154 0.11540.0153 0.1307 0.0000 1,142.919 7 1,142.919
7 0.0278 0.1693 1,194.062
4 Worker 0.3712 0.1891 3.01799.4700e-
003

1.2841 5.2800e-
003

1.2894 0.3415 4.8600e-
003

0.3464 0.0000 916.1626 916.1626 0.02070.0218 923.1885
Total 0.4455 3.2106 3.91920.0212 1.6835 0.0212 1.7048 0.45700.0201 0.4771 0.0000 2,059.082 3 2,059.082
3 0.0485 0.1911 2,117.250
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.0202 0.1374 1.07381.6600e-
003

2.5100e-
003

2.5100e-
003

2.5100e-
003

2.5100e-
003

0.0000 142.6303 142.6303 0.0335 0.0000 143.4685
Total 0.0202 0.1374 1.07381.6600e-
003

2.5100e-
003

2.5100e-
003

2.5100e-
003

2.5100e-
003

0.0000 142.6303 142.6303 0.0335 0.0000 143.4685
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 26 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0743 3.0214 0.90130.0117 0.3994 0.0160 0.4154 0.11540.0153 0.1307 0.0000 1,142.919 7 1,142.919
7 0.0278 0.1693 1,194.062
4 Worker 0.3712 0.1891 3.01799.4700e-
003

1.2841 5.2800e-
003

1.2894 0.3415 4.8600e-
003

0.3464 0.0000 916.1626 916.1626 0.02070.0218 923.1885
Total 0.4455 3.2106 3.91920.0212 1.6835 0.0212 1.7048 0.45700.0201 0.4771 0.0000 2,059.082 3 2,059.082
3 0.0485 0.1911 2,117.250
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.0357 0.3347 0.56858.9000e-
004

0.0163 0.01630.0150 0.0150 0.0000 78.0751 78.07510.0253 0.0000 78.7064 Paving 0.04330.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0790 0.3347 0.56858.9000e-
004

0.0163 0.01630.0150 0.0150 0.0000 78.0751 78.07510.0253 0.0000 78.7064 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 27 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2400e-
003

6.3000e-
004

0.0101 3.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3100e-
003

1.1400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

0.0000 3.0653 3.0653 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

3.0888
Total 1.2400e-
003

6.3000e-
004

0.0101 3.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3100e-
003

1.1400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

0.0000 3.0653 3.0653 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

3.0888
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.0474 0.67458.9000e-
004

1.4600e-
003

1.4600e-
003

1.4600e-
003

1.4600e-
003

0.0000 78.0750 78.0750 0.0253 0.000078.7063
Paving 0.04330.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0542 0.0474 0.67458.9000e-
004

1.4600e-
003

1.4600e-
003

1.4600e-
003

1.4600e-
003

0.0000 78.0750 78.0750 0.0253 0.000078.7063
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 28 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2400e-
003

6.3000e-
004

0.0101 3.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3100e-
003

1.1400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

0.0000 3.0653 3.0653 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

3.0888
Total 1.2400e-
003

6.3000e-
004

0.0101 3.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3100e-
003

1.1400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

0.0000 3.0653 3.0653 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

3.0888
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Archit. Coating 18.74550.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.0400e-
003

0.0338 0.0534 9.0000e-
005

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

0.0000 7.5321 7.5321 4.1000e-
004

0.0000 7.5424
Total 18.7505 0.0338 0.05349.0000e-
005

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

0.0000 7.5321 7.5321 4.1000e-
004

0.0000 7.5424
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 29 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0356 0.0182 0.28979.1000e-
004

0.1233 5.1000e-
004

0.1238 0.0328 4.7000e-
004

0.0333 0.0000 87.9539 87.9539 1.9900e-
003

2.1000e-
003

88.6284
Total 0.0356 0.0182 0.28979.1000e-
004

0.1233 5.1000e-
004

0.1238 0.0328 4.7000e-
004

0.0333 0.0000 87.9539 87.9539 1.9900e-
003

2.1000e-
003

88.6284
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Archit. Coating 18.74550.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.8000e-
004

3.8000e-
003

0.0541 9.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

0.0000 7.5321 7.5321 4.1000e-
004

0.0000 7.5424
Total 18.7463 3.8000e-
003

0.0541 9.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

0.0000 7.5321 7.5321 4.1000e-
004

0.0000 7.5424
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 30 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0356 0.0182 0.28979.1000e-
004

0.1233 5.1000e-
004

0.1238 0.0328 4.7000e-
004

0.0333 0.0000 87.9539 87.9539 1.9900e-
003

2.1000e-
003

88.6284
Total 0.0356 0.0182 0.28979.1000e-
004

0.1233 5.1000e-
004

0.1238 0.0328 4.7000e-
004

0.0333 0.0000 87.9539 87.9539 1.9900e-
003

2.1000e-
003

88.6284
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Archit. Coating 6.03670.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6200e-
003

0.0109 0.0172 3.0000e-
005

4.9000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.4289
Total 6.0383 0.0109 0.01723.0000e-
005

4.9000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.4289
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 31 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0108 5.4300e-
003

0.0894 2.9000e-
004

0.0397 1.5000e-
004

0.0399 0.0106 1.4000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 27.7895 27.7895 5.9000e-
004

6.5000e-
004

27.9976
Total 0.0108 5.4300e-
003

0.0894 2.9000e-
004

0.0397 1.5000e-
004

0.0399 0.0106 1.4000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 27.7895 27.7895 5.9000e-
004

6.5000e-
004

27.9976
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Archit. Coating 6.03670.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.8000e-
004

1.2200e-
003

0.0174 3.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.4289
Total 6.0370 1.2200e-
003

0.0174 3.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.4289
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 32 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0108 5.4300e-
003

0.0894 2.9000e-
004

0.0397 1.5000e-
004

0.0399 0.0106 1.4000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 27.7895 27.7895 5.9000e-
004

6.5000e-
004

27.9976
Total 0.0108 5.4300e-
003

0.0894 2.9000e-
004

0.0397 1.5000e-
004

0.0399 0.0106 1.4000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 27.7895 27.7895 5.9000e-
004

6.5000e-
004

27.9976
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 33 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Mitigated 4.2243 3.2322 24.64520.0316 3.4330 0.0285 3.4615 0.91740.0266 0.9439 0.0000 3,073.143 6 3,073.143
6 0.3822 0.2389 3,153.880
3 Unmitigated 4.2243 3.2322 24.64520.0316 3.4330 0.0285 3.4615 0.91740.0266 0.9439 0.0000 3,073.143 6 3,073.143
6 0.3822 0.2389 3,153.880
3 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip RateUnmitigatedMitigated
Land UseWeekdaySaturdaySundayAnnual VMTAnnual VMT
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 2,031.00 2,031.00 2031.00282,840282,840 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3,487.96 3,487.96 3487.96790,323790,323 Hotel878.40 878.40878.40 419,565419,565
Industrial Park10,096.73 10,096.73 10096.737,777,1167,777,116 Parking Lot0.00 0.000.00
Total16,494.09 16,494.09 16,494.09 9,269,8449,269,844
MilesTrip %Trip Purpose %
Land UseH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWPrimaryDivertedPass-by Convenience Market with Gas
P

3.10 1.55 2.010.80 80.20 19.0014 2165
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Th

3.10 1.55 2.012.20 78.80 19.0029 2150
Hotel 3.101.55 2.01 19.4061.60 19.0058 384
Industrial Park 3.101.55 2.01 59.0028.00 13.0079 192
Parking Lot 3.101.55 2.01 0.000.00 0.000 00

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 34 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2MHDHHDOBUSUBUSMCYSBUSMH
Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Hotel 0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Industrial Park 0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Parking Lot 0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726

5.0 Energy Detail
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12,067.78
03 12,067.78
03 1.1125 0.1348 12,135.77
49 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12,067.78
03 12,067.78
03 1.1125 0.1348 12,135.77
49 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.3956 3.5962 3.0208 0.02160.2733 0.27330.2733 0.2733 0.0000 3,914.900 3 3,914.900
3 0.0750 0.0718 3,938.164
5 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.3956 3.5962 3.0208 0.02160.2733 0.27330.2733 0.2733 0.0000 3,914.900 3 3,914.900
3 0.0750 0.0718 3,938.164
5 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 35 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UsekBTU/yrtons/yrMT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
43497 2.3000e-
004

2.1300e-
003

1.7900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

0.0000 2.3212 2.3212 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

2.3350
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

2.95774e
+006

0.0160 0.1450 0.1218 8.7000e-
004

0.0110 0.01100.0110 0.0110 0.0000 157.8361 157.83613.0300e- 003

2.8900e-
003
158.7741
Hotel 2.80682e
+006

0.0151 0.1376 0.1156 8.3000e-
004

0.0105 0.01050.0105 0.0105 0.0000 149.7824 149.78242.8700e- 003

2.7500e-
003
150.6725
Industrial Park 6.75544e
+007

0.3643 3.3115 2.7817 0.01990.2517 0.25170.2517 0.2517 0.0000 3,604.960 6 3,604.960
6 0.0691 0.0661 3,626.383
1 Parking Lot 0 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total0.3956 3.5962 3.0208 0.02160.2733 0.27330.2733 0.2733 0.0000 3,914.900 3 3,914.900
3 0.0750 0.0718 3,938.164
5 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 36 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UsekBTU/yrtons/yrMT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
43497 2.3000e-
004

2.1300e-
003

1.7900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

0.0000 2.3212 2.3212 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

2.3350
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

2.95774e
+006

0.0160 0.1450 0.1218 8.7000e-
004

0.0110 0.01100.0110 0.0110 0.0000 157.8361 157.83613.0300e- 003

2.8900e-
003
158.7741
Hotel 2.80682e
+006

0.0151 0.1376 0.1156 8.3000e-
004

0.0105 0.01050.0105 0.0105 0.0000 149.7824 149.78242.8700e- 003

2.7500e-
003
150.6725
Industrial Park 6.75544e
+007

0.3643 3.3115 2.7817 0.01990.2517 0.25170.2517 0.2517 0.0000 3,604.960 6 3,604.960
6 0.0691 0.0661 3,626.383
1 Parking Lot 0 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total0.3956 3.5962 3.0208 0.02160.2733 0.27330.2733 0.2733 0.0000 3,914.900 3 3,914.900
3 0.0750 0.0718 3,938.164
5 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 37 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UsekWh/yrMT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
90882 14.7572 1.3600e-
003

1.6000e-
004

14.8403
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
680859 110.5558 0.0102 1.2400e-
003
111.1788
Hotel 691428 112.2720 0.01041.2500e-
003
112.9046
Industrial Park 7.23426e
+007
11,746.76
60 1.0829 0.1313 11,812.95
19 Parking Lot 513800 83.4293 7.6900e-
003

9.3000e-
004

83.8994
Total 12,067.78
03 1.1125 0.1348 12,135.77
49 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 38 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UsekWh/yrMT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
90882 14.7572 1.3600e-
003

1.6000e-
004

14.8403
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
680859 110.5558 0.0102 1.2400e-
003
111.1788
Hotel 691428 112.2720 0.01041.2500e-
003
112.9046
Industrial Park 7.23426e
+007
11,746.76
60 1.0829 0.1313 11,812.95
19 Parking Lot 513800 83.4293 7.6900e-
003

9.3000e-
004

83.8994
Total 12,067.78
03 1.1125 0.1348 12,135.77
49 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 39 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorytons/yrMT/yr
Mitigated 23.2934 1.0400e-
003

0.1150 1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.2388
Unmitigated 23.2934 1.0400e-
003

0.1150 1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.2388

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
SubCategorytons/yrMT/yr
Architectural
Coating

2.47820.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

20.80460.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0106 1.0400e-
003

0.1150 1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.2388
Total 23.2934 1.0400e-
003

0.1150 1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.2388
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 40 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
SubCategorytons/yrMT/yr
Architectural
Coating

2.47820.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

20.80460.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0106 1.0400e-
003

0.1150 1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.2388
Total 23.2934 1.0400e-
003

0.1150 1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.2388
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 41 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
CategoryMT/yr
Mitigated 1,409.739
4 1.5662 0.9434 1,730.031
6 Unmitigated 1,409.739
4 1.5662 0.9434 1,730.031
6 7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UseMgalMT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

0.209144 /

0.128185

0.3161 2.8000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

0.3717
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

5.06901 /

0.323554

6.0784 6.5700e-
003

3.9500e-
003

7.4191
Hotel 3.09475 /

0.343861

3.7942 4.0200e-
003

2.4100e-
003

4.6132
Industrial Park 1203.54 /
0 1,399.550
7 1.5554 0.9369 1,717.627
6 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000
Total 1,409.739
4 1.5662 0.9434 1,730.031
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 42 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UseMgalMT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

0.209144 /

0.128185

0.3161 2.8000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

0.3717
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

5.06901 /

0.323554

6.0784 6.5700e-
003

3.9500e-
003

7.4191
Hotel 3.09475 /

0.343861

3.7942 4.0200e-
003

2.4100e-
003

4.6132
Industrial Park 1203.54 /
0 1,399.550
7 1.5554 0.9369 1,717.627
6 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000
Total 1,409.739
4 1.5662 0.9434 1,730.031
6 Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 43 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 1,362.627
6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852
2 Unmitigated 1,362.627
6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852
2 Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UsetonsMT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
192.37 39.0494 2.3078 0.0000 96.7432
Hotel 66.8 13.55980.8014 0.0000 33.5938
Industrial Park 6453.58 1,310.018
4 77.4199 0.0000 3,245.515
2 Parking Lot 0 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1,362.627
6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852
2 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 44 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UsetonsMT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
192.37 39.0494 2.3078 0.0000 96.7432
Hotel 66.8 13.55980.8014 0.0000 33.5938
Industrial Park 6453.58 1,310.018
4 77.4199 0.0000 3,245.515
2 Parking Lot 0 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1,362.627
6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852
2 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment TypeNumberHours/DayDays/YearHorse PowerLoad FactorFuel Type Forklifts9512.00300890.20Diesel
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 45 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Equipment Typetons/yrMT/yr
Forklifts 1.8573 17.4962 24.23390.0327 0.93660.9366 0.86170.8617 0.0000 2,870.473 4 2,870.473
4 0.9284 0.0000 2,893.682
6 Total 1.8573 17.4962 24.23390.0327 0.93660.9366 0.86170.8617 0.0000 2,870.473 4 2,870.473
4 0.9284 0.0000 2,893.682
6 UnMitigated/Mitigated

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment TypeNumberHours/DayHours/YearHorse PowerLoad FactorFuel Type Boilers
Equipment TypeNumberHeat Input/DayHeat Input/YearBoiler RatingFuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment TypeNumber
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 46 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE's comment on "Underestimated Land Use Size." Construction Phase - See SWAPE's comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths." Grading - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Operational Off-Road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Water Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

1.1 Land Usage
Land UsesSizeMetricLot AcreageFloor Surface AreaPopulation Industrial Park5,204.501000sqft235.60 5,204,500.000
Parking Lot3,670.00Space33.03 1,468,000.000
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru16.701000sqft6.40 16,700.000 Hotel122.00Room4.00 73,400.000
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps20.00Pump3.00 8,100.000

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
6 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days) 3.558

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility CompanySacramento Municipal Utility District
2029 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
357.980.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 1 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Table NameColumn NameDefault ValueNew Value
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.003.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.004.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.009.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays330.0078.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 2 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblConstructionPhaseNumDays4,650.001,101.00
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays465.00110.00
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays330.0078.00
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays180.0043.00
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate6/28/20461/25/2029
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate12/17/20436/21/2028
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate2/19/20264/2/2024
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate3/23/204510/9/2028
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate5/9/202410/31/2023
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate3/24/204510/10/2028
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate2/20/20264/3/2024
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate5/10/202411/1/2023
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate12/18/20436/22/2028
tblGradingAcresOfGrading330.00900.00
tblGradingAcresOfGrading64.5075.00
tblGradingMaterialImported0.00304,000.00
tblLandUseLandUseSquareFeet177,144.0073,400.00
tblLandUseLandUseSquareFeet2,823.508,100.00
tblLandUseLotAcreage119.48235.60
tblLandUseLotAcreage0.386.40
tblLandUseLotAcreage4.074.00
tblLandUseLotAcreage0.063.00
tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperDaysPerYear260.00300.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHoursPerDay8.0012.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber0.0095.00 tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 3 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsST_TR322.50101.55
tblVehicleTripsST_TR616.12208.86
tblVehicleTripsST_TR8.197.20
tblVehicleTripsST_TR2.541.94
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR322.50101.55
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR472.58208.86
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR5.957.20
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR1.241.94
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR322.50101.55
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR470.95208.86
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR8.367.20
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR3.371.94
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 4 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Yearlb/daylb/day
2023 4.3265 86.4733 39.55640.2802 21.4466 1.8257 23.2723 10.16671.6943 11.3321 0.0000 29,807.35 78 29,807.35
78 2.8914 3.7538 30,998.28
01 2024 11.8406 83.0195 103.5890 0.425528.3134 1.7317 29.3156 7.6612 1.60778.6064 0.0000 44,533.67 38 44,533.67
38 2.8697 3.7321 45,687.09
52 2025 11.1378 65.5021 98.36020.4148 28.3126 0.9062 29.2189 7.66100.8548 8.5158 0.0000 43,601.76 15 43,601.76
15 1.5887 3.6418 44,726.74
74 2026 10.6094 64.1547 94.05480.4047 28.3120 0.8947 29.2067 7.66070.8440 8.5047 0.0000 42,701.80 43 42,701.80
43 1.5361 3.5586 43,800.67
78 2027 10.1237 62.9473 90.39700.3950 28.3114 0.8832 29.1946 7.66050.8332 8.4937 0.0000 41,819.07 21 41,819.07
21 1.4875 3.4760 42,892.10
76 2028 637.0260 61.9439 87.3634 0.386128.3108 0.8721 29.1829 7.6603 0.82278.4830 0.0000 41,009.90 57 41,009.90
57 1.4472 3.4000 42,059.29
74 2029 636.9471 1.6687 12.70890.0358 4.3284 0.0676 4.3960 1.14810.0663 1.2145 0.0000 3,811.625 0 3,811.625
0 0.0796 0.0710 3,834.766
9 Maximum 637.0260 86.4733 103.5890 0.425528.3134 1.8257 29.3156 10.1667 1.694311.3321 0.0000 44,533.67 38 44,533.67
38 2.8914 3.7538 45,687.09
52 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 5 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Yearlb/daylb/day
2023 1.7663 55.2578 44.50440.2802 21.4466 0.5027 21.9494 10.16670.4854 10.2295 0.0000 29,807.35 78 29,807.35
78 2.8914 3.7538 30,998.28
01 2024 10.6969 56.7120 104.8824 0.425528.3134 0.4978 28.7431 7.6612 0.48068.0703 0.0000 44,533.67 38 44,533.67
38 2.8697 3.7321 45,687.09
52 2025 10.0982 55.2672 99.73580.4148 28.3126 0.4195 28.7321 7.66100.3994 8.0603 0.0000 43,601.76 15 43,601.76
15 1.5887 3.6418 44,726.74
74 2026 9.5698 53.9198 95.43040.4047 28.3120 0.4079 28.7199 7.66070.3885 8.0492 0.0000 42,701.80 43 42,701.80
43 1.5361 3.5586 43,800.67
78 2027 9.0842 52.7123 91.77260.3950 28.3114 0.3964 28.7078 7.66050.3777 8.0382 0.0000 41,819.07 21 41,819.07
21 1.4875 3.4760 42,892.10
76 2028 636.8849 51.7089 88.7390 0.386128.3108 0.3854 28.6962 7.6603 0.36738.0276 0.0000 41,009.90 57 41,009.90
57 1.4472 3.4000 42,059.29
74 2029 636.8060 0.6519 12.73210.0358 4.3284 0.0201 4.3485 1.14810.0188 1.1669 0.0000 3,811.625 0 3,811.625
0 0.0796 0.0710 3,834.766
9 Maximum 636.8849 56.7120 104.8824 0.425528.3134 0.5027 28.7431 10.1667 0.485410.2295 0.0000 44,533.67 38 44,533.67
38 2.8914 3.7538 45,687.09
52 Mitigated Construction
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio-CO2Total CO2CH4N20CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.54 23.37 -2.24 0.000.00 63.38 2.240.00 62.55 6.360.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 6 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Area 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Energy 2.1676 19.7052 16.55240.1182 1.49761.4976 1.49761.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mobile 31.9976 16.6196 130.8355 0.185219.5314 0.1567 19.6881 5.2046 0.14585.3505 19,846.36 60 19,846.36
60 2.0756 1.3895 20,312.32
53 Offroad 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.21786.2442 6.24425.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 174.2086 152.9749 309.8674 0.521319.5314 7.9018 27.4332 5.2046 7.391412.5960 0.0000 64,588.97 64 64,588.97
64 9.3563 1.8230 65,366.14
09 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 7 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Area 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Energy 2.1676 19.7052 16.55240.1182 1.49761.4976 1.49761.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mobile 31.9976 16.6196 130.8355 0.185219.5314 0.1567 19.6881 5.2046 0.14585.3505 19,846.36 60 19,846.36
60 2.0756 1.3895 20,312.32
53 Offroad 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.21786.2442 6.24425.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 174.2086 152.9749 309.8674 0.521319.5314 7.9018 27.4332 5.2046 7.391412.5960 0.0000 64,588.97 64 64,588.97
64 9.3563 1.8230 65,366.14
09 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase NamePhase TypeStart DateEnd DateNum Days
Week
Num DaysPhase Description
1Site PreparationSite Preparation9/1/2023 10/31/2023543 2GradingGrading11/1/20234/2/20245110
3Building ConstructionBuilding Construction4/3/20246/21/202851101 4PavingPaving6/22/2028 10/9/2028578
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio-CO2Total CO2CH4N20CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 8 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 5Architectural CoatingArchitectural Coating 10/10/2028 1/25/2029578 OffRoad Equipment
Phase NameOffroad Equipment TypeAmountUsage HoursHorse PowerLoad Factor Architectural CoatingAir Compressors1 6.00780.48
Building ConstructionCranes1 7.00231 0.29
GradingExcavators28.001580.38
Building ConstructionForklifts38.00890.20
Building ConstructionGenerator Sets1 8.00840.74
GradingGraders1 8.001870.41
PavingPavers28.001300.42
PavingPaving Equipment28.001320.36
PavingRollers28.00800.38
GradingRubber Tired Dozers1 8.002470.40
Site PreparationRubber Tired Dozers38.002470.40
GradingScrapers28.003670.48
Building ConstructionTractors/Loaders/Backhoes37.00970.37 GradingTractors/Loaders/Backhoes28.00970.37
Site PreparationTractors/Loaders/Backhoes48.00970.37
Building ConstructionWelders1 8.00460.45
Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 7,954,050; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,651,350; Striped Parking Area:
88,080 (Architectural Coating –sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 75
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 900
Acres of Paving: 33.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 9 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust19.9160 0.0000 19.9160 10.1304 0.000010.13040.00000.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.24430.0381 1.26601.2660 1.16471.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.24430.0381 19.9160 1.2660 21.1820 10.13041.1647 11.2952 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Phase NameOffroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation718.000.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading820.000.0038,000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction92,843.001,110.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving615.000.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1569.000.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 10 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0607 0.0291 0.49061.2500e-
003

0.1369 7.1000e-
004

0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e-
004

0.0370 128.1058 128.10583.5200e-
003

3.1500e-
003
129.1312
Total 0.0607 0.0291 0.49061.2500e-
003

0.1369 7.1000e-
004

0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e-
004

0.0370 128.1058 128.10583.5200e-
003

3.1500e-
003
129.1312
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust19.9160 0.0000 19.9160 10.1304 0.000010.13040.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.4656 2.0175 20.86900.0381 0.06210.0621 0.06210.0621 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 0.4656 2.0175 20.86900.0381 19.9160 0.0621 19.9781 10.13040.0621 10.1925 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 11 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0607 0.0291 0.49061.2500e-
003

0.1369 7.1000e-
004

0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e-
004

0.0370 128.1058 128.10583.5200e-
003

3.1500e-
003
129.1312
Total 0.0607 0.0291 0.49061.2500e-
003

0.1369 7.1000e-
004

0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e-
004

0.0370 128.1058 128.10583.5200e-
003

3.1500e-
003
129.1312
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.00004.33370.00000.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.05120.0621 1.42451.4245 1.31051.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.05120.0621 15.2704 1.4245 16.6949 4.33371.3105 5.64426,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 12 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.9374 51.9254 10.96020.2167 6.0240 0.4004 6.4245 1.64960.3831 2.032723,653.54 03 23,653.54
03 0.9432 3.7503 24,794.71
74 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0674 0.0324 0.54511.3900e-
003

0.1521 7.8000e-
004

0.1529 0.0404 7.2000e-
004

0.0411 142.3398 142.33983.9100e-
003

3.5000e-
003
143.4791
Total 1.0048 51.9577 11.50520.2181 6.1762 0.4012 6.5774 1.68990.3838 2.073823,795.88 00 23,795.88
00 0.9471 3.7538 24,938.19
65 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.00004.33370.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.7616 3.3000 32.99910.0621 0.10150.1015 0.10150.1015 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 0.7616 3.3000 32.99910.0621 15.2704 0.1015 15.3720 4.33370.1015 4.4352 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 13 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.9374 51.9254 10.96020.2167 6.0240 0.4004 6.4245 1.64960.3831 2.032723,653.54 03 23,653.54
03 0.9432 3.7503 24,794.71
74 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0674 0.0324 0.54511.3900e-
003

0.1521 7.8000e-
004

0.1529 0.0404 7.2000e-
004

0.0411 142.3398 142.33983.9100e-
003

3.5000e-
003
143.4791
Total 1.0048 51.9577 11.50520.2181 6.1762 0.4012 6.5774 1.68990.3838 2.073823,795.88 00 23,795.88
00 0.9471 3.7538 24,938.19
65 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.00004.33370.00000.0000 Off-Road 3.2181 32.3770 27.72280.0621 1.33541.3354 1.22861.2286 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.72280.0621 15.2704 1.3354 16.6058 4.33371.2286 5.56226,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 14 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.9161 50.6137 11.00030.2125 6.0226 0.3955 6.4181 1.64910.3784 2.027523,198.37 75 23,198.37
75 0.9225 3.6785 24,317.61
98 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0630 0.0289 0.50601.3500e-
003

0.1521 7.5000e-
004

0.1529 0.0404 6.9000e-
004

0.0410 138.7506 138.75063.5300e-
003

3.2500e-
003
139.8078
Total 0.9791 50.6425 11.50630.2138 6.1747 0.3963 6.5710 1.68940.3791 2.068523,337.12 81 23,337.12
81 0.9260 3.6817 24,457.42
76 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.00004.33370.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.7616 3.3000 32.99910.0621 0.10150.1015 0.10150.1015 0.0000 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Total 0.7616 3.3000 32.99910.0621 15.2704 0.1015 15.3720 4.33370.1015 4.4352 0.0000 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 15 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.9161 50.6137 11.00030.2125 6.0226 0.3955 6.4181 1.64910.3784 2.027523,198.37 75 23,198.37
75 0.9225 3.6785 24,317.61
98 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0630 0.0289 0.50601.3500e-
003

0.1521 7.5000e-
004

0.1529 0.0404 6.9000e-
004

0.0410 138.7506 138.75063.5300e-
003

3.2500e-
003
139.8078
Total 0.9791 50.6425 11.50630.2138 6.1747 0.3963 6.5710 1.68940.3791 2.068523,337.12 81 23,337.12
81 0.9260 3.6817 24,457.42
76 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.16680.0270 0.61330.6133 0.57690.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.16680.0270 0.61330.6133 0.57690.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 16 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.4208 50.3768 15.49840.2074 6.6867 0.2828 6.9695 1.92460.2705 2.195122,254.58 31 22,254.58
31 0.5449 3.2698 23,242.60
82 Worker 8.9483 4.1005 71.92380.1912 21.6267 0.1062 21.7328 5.73670.0978 5.834419,723.39 18 19,723.39
18 0.5015 0.4623 19,873.67
94 Total 10.3691 54.4773 87.42220.3986 28.3134 0.3890 28.7023 7.66120.3683 8.029541,977.97 49 41,977.97
49 1.0464 3.7321 43,116.28
76 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 17 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.4208 50.3768 15.49840.2074 6.6867 0.2828 6.9695 1.92460.2705 2.195122,254.58 31 22,254.58
31 0.5449 3.2698 23,242.60
82 Worker 8.9483 4.1005 71.92380.1912 21.6267 0.1062 21.7328 5.73670.0978 5.834419,723.39 18 19,723.39
18 0.5015 0.4623 19,873.67
94 Total 10.3691 54.4773 87.42220.3986 28.3134 0.3890 28.7023 7.66120.3683 8.029541,977.97 49 41,977.97
49 1.0464 3.7321 43,116.28
76 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 18 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3697 49.3513 15.13490.2031 6.6860 0.2772 6.9631 1.92430.2651 2.189421,803.31 59 21,803.31
59 0.5336 3.2096 22,773.10
88 Worker 8.4006 3.6811 67.14060.1847 21.6267 0.1015 21.7282 5.73670.0934 5.830119,241.97 12 19,241.97
12 0.4541 0.4323 19,382.14
05 Total 9.7704 53.0325 82.27560.3878 28.3126 0.3787 28.6913 7.66100.3586 8.019541,045.28 71 41,045.28
71 0.9877 3.6418 42,155.24
93 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 19 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3697 49.3513 15.13490.2031 6.6860 0.2772 6.9631 1.92430.2651 2.189421,803.31 59 21,803.31
59 0.5336 3.2096 22,773.10
88 Worker 8.4006 3.6811 67.14060.1847 21.6267 0.1015 21.7282 5.73670.0934 5.830119,241.97 12 19,241.97
12 0.4541 0.4323 19,382.14
05 Total 9.7704 53.0325 82.27560.3878 28.3126 0.3787 28.6913 7.66100.3586 8.019541,045.28 71 41,045.28
71 0.9877 3.6418 42,155.24
93 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 20 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3220 48.3471 14.83650.1989 6.6853 0.2704 6.9557 1.92410.2586 2.182721,363.63 77 21,363.63
77 0.5219 3.1512 22,315.75
21 Worker 7.9200 3.3380 63.13360.1788 21.6267 0.0968 21.7234 5.73670.0891 5.825818,781.69 23 18,781.69
23 0.4133 0.4074 18,913.42
77 Total 9.2420 51.6850 77.97010.3778 28.3120 0.3671 28.6791 7.66070.3477 8.008440,145.33 00 40,145.33
00 0.9352 3.5586 41,229.17
97 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 21 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3220 48.3471 14.83650.1989 6.6853 0.2704 6.9557 1.92410.2586 2.182721,363.63 77 21,363.63
77 0.5219 3.1512 22,315.75
21 Worker 7.9200 3.3380 63.13360.1788 21.6267 0.0968 21.7234 5.73670.0891 5.825818,781.69 23 18,781.69
23 0.4133 0.4074 18,913.42
77 Total 9.2420 51.6850 77.97010.3778 28.3120 0.3671 28.6791 7.66070.3477 8.008440,145.33 00 40,145.33
00 0.9352 3.5586 41,229.17
97 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 22 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2795 47.4267 14.58250.1946 6.6847 0.2642 6.9488 1.92380.2527 2.176520,904.75 78 20,904.75
78 0.5085 3.0895 21,838.13
43 Worker 7.4768 3.0509 59.72980.1734 21.6267 0.0915 21.7182 5.73670.0842 5.820918,357.83 99 18,357.83
99 0.3780 0.3865 18,482.47
52 Total 8.7563 50.4776 74.31240.3681 28.3114 0.3557 28.6670 7.66050.3369 7.997439,262.59 77 39,262.59
77 0.8865 3.4760 40,320.60
95 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 23 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2795 47.4267 14.58250.1946 6.6847 0.2642 6.9488 1.92380.2527 2.176520,904.75 78 20,904.75
78 0.5085 3.0895 21,838.13
43 Worker 7.4768 3.0509 59.72980.1734 21.6267 0.0915 21.7182 5.73670.0842 5.820918,357.83 99 18,357.83
99 0.3780 0.3865 18,482.47
52 Total 8.7563 50.4776 74.31240.3681 28.3114 0.3557 28.6670 7.66050.3369 7.997439,262.59 77 39,262.59
77 0.8865 3.4760 40,320.60
95 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 24 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2422 46.6600 14.37980.1906 6.6841 0.2587 6.9428 1.92360.2474 2.171020,474.74 18 20,474.74
18 0.4986 3.0308 21,390.39
31 Worker 7.0734 2.8142 56.89890.1686 21.6267 0.0859 21.7126 5.73670.0791 5.815717,978.68 95 17,978.68
95 0.3477 0.3692 18,097.40
63 Total 8.3156 49.4742 71.27870.3592 28.3108 0.3446 28.6554 7.66030.3265 7.986838,453.43 13 38,453.43
13 0.8463 3.4000 39,487.79
94 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 25 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2422 46.6600 14.37980.1906 6.6841 0.2587 6.9428 1.92360.2474 2.171020,474.74 18 20,474.74
18 0.4986 3.0308 21,390.39
31 Worker 7.0734 2.8142 56.89890.1686 21.6267 0.0859 21.7126 5.73670.0791 5.815717,978.68 95 17,978.68
95 0.3477 0.3692 18,097.40
63 Total 8.3156 49.4742 71.27870.3592 28.3108 0.3446 28.6554 7.66030.3265 7.986838,453.43 13 38,453.43
13 0.8463 3.4000 39,487.79
94 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.57800.0228 0.41850.4185 0.38500.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 1.10950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Total 2.0246 8.5816 14.57800.0228 0.41850.4185 0.38500.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 26 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0373 0.0149 0.30028.9000e-
004

0.1141 4.5000e-
004

0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e-
004

0.0307 94.8577 94.85771.8300e-
003

1.9500e-
003

95.4840
Total 0.0373 0.0149 0.30028.9000e-
004

0.1141 4.5000e-
004

0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e-
004

0.0307 94.8577 94.85771.8300e-
003

1.9500e-
003

95.4840
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.2805 1.2154 17.29570.0228 0.03740.0374 0.03740.0374 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 1.10950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Total 1.3899 1.2154 17.29570.0228 0.03740.0374 0.03740.0374 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 27 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0373 0.0149 0.30028.9000e-
004

0.1141 4.5000e-
004

0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e-
004

0.0307 94.8577 94.85771.8300e-
003

1.9500e-
003

95.4840
Total 0.0373 0.0149 0.30028.9000e-
004

0.1141 4.5000e-
004

0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e-
004

0.0307 94.8577 94.85771.8300e-
003

1.9500e-
003

95.4840
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Archit. Coating 635.43950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.80912.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.05150.0515 0.0515281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319 Total 635.6103 1.1455 1.80912.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.05150.0515 0.0515281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 28 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4157 0.5632 11.38780.0337 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.14810.0158 1.16403,598.267 4 3,598.267
4 0.0696 0.0739 3,622.027
5 Total 1.4157 0.5632 11.38780.0337 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.14810.0158 1.16403,598.267 4 3,598.267
4 0.0696 0.0739 3,622.027
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Archit. Coating 635.43950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.83242.9700e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319
Total 635.4692 0.1288 1.83242.9700e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 29 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4157 0.5632 11.38780.0337 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.14810.0158 1.16403,598.267 4 3,598.267
4 0.0696 0.0739 3,622.027
5 Total 1.4157 0.5632 11.38780.0337 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.14810.0158 1.16403,598.267 4 3,598.267
4 0.0696 0.0739 3,622.027
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Archit. Coating 635.43950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.80912.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.05150.0515 0.0515281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319 Total 635.6103 1.1455 1.80912.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.05150.0515 0.0515281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 30 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.3368 0.5232 10.89970.0329 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.14810.0148 1.16303,530.177 0 3,530.177
0 0.0643 0.0710 3,552.935
0 Total 1.3368 0.5232 10.89970.0329 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.14810.0148 1.16303,530.177 0 3,530.177
0 0.0643 0.0710 3,552.935
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Archit. Coating 635.43950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.83242.9700e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319
Total 635.4692 0.1288 1.83242.9700e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 31 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.3368 0.5232 10.89970.0329 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.14810.0148 1.16303,530.177 0 3,530.177
0 0.0643 0.0710 3,552.935
0 Total 1.3368 0.5232 10.89970.0329 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.14810.0148 1.16303,530.177 0 3,530.177
0 0.0643 0.0710 3,552.935
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 32 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Mitigated 31.9976 16.6196 130.8355 0.185219.5314 0.1567 19.6881 5.2046 0.14585.3505 19,846.36 60 19,846.36
60 2.0756 1.3895 20,312.32
53 Unmitigated 31.9976 16.6196 130.8355 0.185219.5314 0.1567 19.6881 5.2046 0.14585.3505 19,846.36 60 19,846.36
60 2.0756 1.3895 20,312.32
53 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip RateUnmitigatedMitigated
Land UseWeekdaySaturdaySundayAnnual VMTAnnual VMT
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 2,031.00 2,031.00 2031.00282,840282,840 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3,487.96 3,487.96 3487.96790,323790,323 Hotel878.40 878.40878.40 419,565419,565
Industrial Park10,096.73 10,096.73 10096.737,777,1167,777,116 Parking Lot0.00 0.000.00
Total16,494.09 16,494.09 16,494.09 9,269,8449,269,844
MilesTrip %Trip Purpose %
Land UseH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWPrimaryDivertedPass-by Convenience Market with Gas
P

3.10 1.55 2.010.80 80.20 19.0014 2165
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Th

3.10 1.55 2.012.20 78.80 19.0029 2150
Hotel 3.101.55 2.01 19.4061.60 19.0058 384
Industrial Park 3.101.55 2.01 59.0028.00 13.0079 192
Parking Lot 3.101.55 2.01 0.000.00 0.000 00

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 33 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2MHDHHDOBUSUBUSMCYSBUSMH
Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Hotel 0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Industrial Park 0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Parking Lot 0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726

5.0 Energy Detail
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.11821.4976 1.49761.4976 1.497623,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.11821.4976 1.49761.4976 1.497623,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 34 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UsekBTU/yrlb/daylb/day
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
119.17 1.2900e-
003

0.0117 9.8100e-
003

7.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

14.0200 14.0200 2.7000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

14.1033
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
8103.39 0.0874 0.7945 0.6673 4.7700e-
003

0.0604 0.06040.0604 0.0604953.3399 953.3399 0.0183 0.0175 959.0051 Hotel 7689.91 0.0829 0.75390.6333 4.5200e-
003

0.0573 0.05730.0573 0.0573904.6949 904.6949 0.0173 0.0166 910.0711 Industrial Park 185081 1.9960 18.1452 15.24190.1089 1.37901.3790 1.37901.3790 21,774.18 53 21,774.18
53 0.4173 0.3992 21,903.57
84 Parking Lot 0 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.11821.4976 1.49761.4976 1.497623,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 35 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UsekBTU/yrlb/daylb/day
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

0.11917 1.2900e-
003

0.0117 9.8100e-
003

7.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

14.0200 14.0200 2.7000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

14.1033
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

8.10339 0.0874 0.7945 0.6673 4.7700e-
003

0.0604 0.06040.0604 0.0604953.3399 953.3399 0.0183 0.0175 959.0051 Hotel 7.68991 0.0829 0.75390.6333 4.5200e-
003

0.0573 0.05730.0573 0.0573904.6949 904.6949 0.0173 0.0166 910.0711 Industrial Park 185.081 1.9960 18.1452 15.24190.1089 1.37901.3790 1.37901.3790 21,774.18 53 21,774.18
53 0.4173 0.3992 21,903.57
84 Parking Lot 0 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.11821.4976 1.49761.4976 1.497623,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 36 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Mitigated 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Unmitigated 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
SubCategorylb/daylb/day
Architectural
Coating

13.57930.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Consumer
Products
113.99780.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Landscaping 0.0847 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Total 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 37 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
SubCategorylb/daylb/day
Architectural
Coating

13.57930.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Consumer
Products
113.99780.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Landscaping 0.0847 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Total 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment TypeNumberHours/DayDays/YearHorse PowerLoad FactorFuel Type Forklifts9512.00300890.20Diesel
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 38 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Equipment Typelb/daylb/day
Forklifts 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.21786.2442 6.24425.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.21786.2442 6.24425.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 UnMitigated/Mitigated

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment TypeNumberHours/DayHours/YearHorse PowerLoad FactorFuel Type Boilers
Equipment TypeNumberHeat Input/DayHeat Input/YearBoiler RatingFuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment TypeNumber
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 39 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE's comment on "Underestimated Land Use Size." Construction Phase - See SWAPE's comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths." Grading - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Operational Off-Road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Water Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

1.1 Land Usage
Land UsesSizeMetricLot AcreageFloor Surface AreaPopulation Industrial Park5,204.501000sqft235.60 5,204,500.000
Parking Lot3,670.00Space33.03 1,468,000.000
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru16.701000sqft6.40 16,700.000 Hotel122.00Room4.00 73,400.000
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps20.00Pump3.00 8,100.000

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
6 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days) 3.558

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility CompanySacramento Municipal Utility District
2029 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
357.980.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 1 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Table NameColumn NameDefault ValueNew Value
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.003.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.004.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.009.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.002.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated0.001.00 tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigationTierNo ChangeTier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays330.0078.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 2 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblConstructionPhaseNumDays4,650.001,101.00
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays465.00110.00
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays330.0078.00
tblConstructionPhaseNumDays180.0043.00
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate6/28/20461/25/2029
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate12/17/20436/21/2028
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate2/19/20264/2/2024
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate3/23/204510/9/2028
tblConstructionPhasePhaseEndDate5/9/202410/31/2023
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate3/24/204510/10/2028
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate2/20/20264/3/2024
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate5/10/202411/1/2023
tblConstructionPhasePhaseStartDate12/18/20436/22/2028
tblGradingAcresOfGrading330.00900.00
tblGradingAcresOfGrading64.5075.00
tblGradingMaterialImported0.00304,000.00
tblLandUseLandUseSquareFeet177,144.0073,400.00
tblLandUseLandUseSquareFeet2,823.508,100.00
tblLandUseLotAcreage119.48235.60
tblLandUseLotAcreage0.386.40
tblLandUseLotAcreage4.074.00
tblLandUseLotAcreage0.063.00
tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperDaysPerYear260.00300.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHoursPerDay8.0012.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber0.0095.00 tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 3 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTripsCC_TL5.001.55
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCNW_TL6.502.01
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsCW_TL10.003.10
tblVehicleTripsST_TR322.50101.55
tblVehicleTripsST_TR616.12208.86
tblVehicleTripsST_TR8.197.20
tblVehicleTripsST_TR2.541.94
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR322.50101.55
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR472.58208.86
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR5.957.20
tblVehicleTripsSU_TR1.241.94
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR322.50101.55
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR470.95208.86
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR8.367.20
tblVehicleTripsWD_TR3.371.94
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 4 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Yearlb/daylb/day
2023 4.2745 90.6980 39.68590.2802 21.4466 1.8272 23.2738 10.16671.6958 11.3321 0.0000 29,805.08 44 29,805.08
44 2.8897 3.7566 30,996.80
46 2024 10.7841 87.1477 95.31830.4046 28.3134 1.7331 29.3186 7.66121.6090 8.6092 0.0000 42,379.38 41 42,379.38
41 2.8679 3.8073 43,557.15
32 2025 10.1521 70.0542 90.89250.3947 28.3126 0.9089 29.2215 7.66100.8574 8.5184 0.0000 41,507.56 39 41,507.56
39 1.6605 3.7123 42,655.33
39 2026 9.6894 68.5666 87.20960.3853 28.3120 0.8971 29.2091 7.66070.8462 8.5070 0.0000 40,663.83 98 40,663.83
98 1.6031 3.6251 41,784.19
28 2027 9.2603 67.2372 84.05020.3763 28.3114 0.8854 29.1967 7.66050.8352 8.4957 0.0000 39,831.83 19 39,831.83
19 1.5501 3.5391 40,925.24
90 2028 636.8733 66.1342 81.4138 0.367928.3108 0.8741 29.1849 7.6603 0.82468.4849 0.0000 39,067.26 25 39,067.26
25 1.5059 3.4604 40,136.11
86 2029 636.8041 1.7854 11.45820.0322 4.3284 0.0676 4.3960 1.14810.0663 1.2145 0.0000 3,425.343 0 3,425.343
0 0.0912 0.0812 3,451.815
1 Maximum 636.8733 90.6980 95.3183 0.404628.3134 1.8272 29.3186 10.1667 1.695811.3321 0.0000 42,379.38 41 42,379.38
41 2.8897 3.8073 43,557.15
32 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 5 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Yearlb/daylb/day
2023 1.7144 59.4824 44.63380.2802 21.4466 0.5042 21.9509 10.16670.4868 10.2295 0.0000 29,805.08 44 29,805.08
44 2.8897 3.7566 30,996.80
46 2024 9.6404 61.4224 96.61180.4046 28.3134 0.4992 28.7461 7.66120.4820 8.0731 0.0000 42,379.38 41 42,379.38
41 2.8679 3.8073 43,557.15
32 2025 9.1125 59.8193 92.26800.3947 28.3126 0.4221 28.7348 7.66100.4019 8.0629 0.0000 41,507.56 39 41,507.56
39 1.6605 3.7123 42,655.33
39 2026 8.6498 58.3316 88.58520.3853 28.3120 0.4103 28.7223 7.66070.3908 8.0515 0.0000 40,663.83 98 40,663.83
98 1.6031 3.6251 41,784.19
28 2027 8.2207 57.0022 85.42580.3763 28.3114 0.3986 28.7100 7.66050.3798 8.0403 0.0000 39,831.83 19 39,831.83
19 1.5501 3.5391 40,925.24
90 2028 636.7322 55.8993 82.7894 0.367928.3108 0.3873 28.6981 7.6603 0.36918.0294 0.0000 39,067.26 25 39,067.26
25 1.5059 3.4604 40,136.11
86 2029 636.6630 0.7687 11.48140.0322 4.3284 0.0201 4.3485 1.14810.0188 1.1669 0.0000 3,425.343 0 3,425.343
0 0.0912 0.0812 3,451.815
1 Maximum 636.7322 61.4224 96.6118 0.404628.3134 0.5042 28.7461 10.1667 0.486810.2295 0.0000 42,379.38 41 42,379.38
41 2.8897 3.8073 43,557.15
32 Mitigated Construction
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio-CO2Total CO2CH4N20CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.54 21.90 -2.40 0.000.00 63.27 2.240.00 62.45 6.360.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 6 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Area 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Energy 2.1676 19.7052 16.55240.1182 1.49761.4976 1.49761.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mobile 21.1116 19.0334 155.1707 0.171219.5314 0.1573 19.6887 5.2046 0.14645.3510 18,349.12 52 18,349.12
52 2.6067 1.5354 18,871.85
15 Offroad 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.21786.2442 6.24425.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 163.3226 155.3887 334.2026 0.507419.5314 7.9023 27.4337 5.2046 7.391912.5966 0.0000 63,091.73 56 63,091.73
56 9.8874 1.9690 63,925.66
71 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 7 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Area 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Energy 2.1676 19.7052 16.55240.1182 1.49761.4976 1.49761.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mobile 21.1116 19.0334 155.1707 0.171219.5314 0.1573 19.6887 5.2046 0.14645.3510 18,349.12 52 18,349.12
52 2.6067 1.5354 18,871.85
15 Offroad 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.21786.2442 6.24425.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 163.3226 155.3887 334.2026 0.507419.5314 7.9023 27.4337 5.2046 7.391912.5966 0.0000 63,091.73 56 63,091.73
56 9.8874 1.9690 63,925.66
71 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase NamePhase TypeStart DateEnd DateNum Days
Week
Num DaysPhase Description
1Site PreparationSite Preparation9/1/2023 10/31/2023543 2GradingGrading11/1/20234/2/20245110
3Building ConstructionBuilding Construction4/3/20246/21/202851101 4PavingPaving6/22/2028 10/9/2028578
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio-CO2Total CO2CH4N20CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 8 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 5Architectural CoatingArchitectural Coating 10/10/2028 1/25/2029578 OffRoad Equipment
Phase NameOffroad Equipment TypeAmountUsage HoursHorse PowerLoad Factor Architectural CoatingAir Compressors1 6.00780.48
Building ConstructionCranes1 7.00231 0.29
GradingExcavators28.001580.38
Building ConstructionForklifts38.00890.20
Building ConstructionGenerator Sets1 8.00840.74
GradingGraders1 8.001870.41
PavingPavers28.001300.42
PavingPaving Equipment28.001320.36
PavingRollers28.00800.38
GradingRubber Tired Dozers1 8.002470.40
Site PreparationRubber Tired Dozers38.002470.40
GradingScrapers28.003670.48
Building ConstructionTractors/Loaders/Backhoes37.00970.37 GradingTractors/Loaders/Backhoes28.00970.37
Site PreparationTractors/Loaders/Backhoes48.00970.37
Building ConstructionWelders1 8.00460.45
Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 7,954,050; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,651,350; Striped Parking Area:
88,080 (Architectural Coating –sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 75
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 900
Acres of Paving: 33.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 9 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust19.9160 0.0000 19.9160 10.1304 0.000010.13040.00000.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.24430.0381 1.26601.2660 1.16471.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.24430.0381 19.9160 1.2660 21.1820 10.13041.1647 11.2952 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Phase NameOffroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation718.000.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading820.000.0038,000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction92,843.001,110.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving615.000.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1569.000.000.0010.006.5020.00LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 10 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0537 0.0358 0.42721.1100e-
003

0.1369 7.1000e-
004

0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e-
004

0.0370 113.9541 113.95414.0500e-
003

3.6100e-
003
115.1305
Total 0.0537 0.0358 0.42721.1100e-
003

0.1369 7.1000e-
004

0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e-
004

0.0370 113.9541 113.95414.0500e-
003

3.6100e-
003
115.1305
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust19.9160 0.0000 19.9160 10.1304 0.000010.13040.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.4656 2.0175 20.86900.0381 0.06210.0621 0.06210.0621 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 0.4656 2.0175 20.86900.0381 19.9160 0.0621 19.9781 10.13040.0621 10.1925 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 11 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0537 0.0358 0.42721.1100e-
003

0.1369 7.1000e-
004

0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e-
004

0.0370 113.9541 113.95414.0500e-
003

3.6100e-
003
115.1305
Total 0.0537 0.0358 0.42721.1100e-
003

0.1369 7.1000e-
004

0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e-
004

0.0370 113.9541 113.95414.0500e-
003

3.6100e-
003
115.1305
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.00004.33370.00000.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.05120.0621 1.42451.4245 1.31051.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.05120.0621 15.2704 1.4245 16.6949 4.33371.3105 5.64426,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 12 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.8931 56.1427 11.16000.2169 6.0240 0.4019 6.4260 1.64960.3845 2.034123,666.99 10 23,666.99
10 0.9409 3.7526 24,808.79
82 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0597 0.0397 0.47471.2400e-
003

0.1521 7.8000e-
004

0.1529 0.0404 7.2000e-
004

0.0411 126.6156 126.61564.5000e-
003

4.0100e-
003
127.9228
Total 0.9528 56.1824 11.63470.2181 6.1762 0.4027 6.5789 1.68990.3853 2.075223,793.60 66 23,793.60
66 0.9454 3.7566 24,936.72
11 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.00004.33370.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.7616 3.3000 32.99910.0621 0.10150.1015 0.10150.1015 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 0.7616 3.3000 32.99910.0621 15.2704 0.1015 15.3720 4.33370.1015 4.4352 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 13 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.8931 56.1427 11.16000.2169 6.0240 0.4019 6.4260 1.64960.3845 2.034123,666.99 10 23,666.99
10 0.9409 3.7526 24,808.79
82 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0597 0.0397 0.47471.2400e-
003

0.1521 7.8000e-
004

0.1529 0.0404 7.2000e-
004

0.0411 126.6156 126.61564.5000e-
003

4.0100e-
003
127.9228
Total 0.9528 56.1824 11.63470.2181 6.1762 0.4027 6.5789 1.68990.3853 2.075223,793.60 66 23,793.60
66 0.9454 3.7566 24,936.72
11 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.00004.33370.00000.0000 Off-Road 3.2181 32.3770 27.72280.0621 1.33541.3354 1.22861.2286 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.72280.0621 15.2704 1.3354 16.6058 4.33371.2286 5.56226,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 14 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.8716 54.7353 11.19630.2126 6.0226 0.3969 6.4195 1.64910.3797 2.028823,212.64 47 23,212.64
47 0.9201 3.6809 24,332.55
29 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0559 0.0354 0.44281.2000e-
003

0.1521 7.5000e-
004

0.1529 0.0404 6.9000e-
004

0.0410 123.4634 123.46344.0900e-
003

3.7300e-
003
124.6763
Total 0.9274 54.7707 11.63910.2138 6.1747 0.3977 6.5724 1.68940.3804 2.069823,336.10 82 23,336.10
82 0.9242 3.6846 24,457.22
92 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Fugitive Dust15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.00004.33370.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.7616 3.3000 32.99910.0621 0.10150.1015 0.10150.1015 0.0000 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Total 0.7616 3.3000 32.99910.0621 15.2704 0.1015 15.3720 4.33370.1015 4.4352 0.0000 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 15 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.8716 54.7353 11.19630.2126 6.0226 0.3969 6.4195 1.64910.3797 2.028823,212.64 47 23,212.64
47 0.9201 3.6809 24,332.55
29 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0559 0.0354 0.44281.2000e-
003

0.1521 7.5000e-
004

0.1529 0.0404 6.9000e-
004

0.0410 123.4634 123.46344.0900e-
003

3.7300e-
003
124.6763
Total 0.9274 54.7707 11.63910.2138 6.1747 0.3977 6.5724 1.68940.3804 2.069823,336.10 82 23,336.10
82 0.9242 3.6846 24,457.22
92 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.16680.0270 0.61330.6133 0.57690.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.16680.0270 0.61330.6133 0.57690.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 16 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3714 54.1596 16.21300.2076 6.6867 0.2858 6.9725 1.92460.2734 2.197922,273.35 88 22,273.35
88 0.5424 3.2775 23,263.60
95 Worker 7.9412 5.0281 62.93860.1701 21.6267 0.1062 21.7328 5.73670.0978 5.834417,550.32 64 17,550.32
64 0.5808 0.5298 17,722.73
60 Total 9.3125 59.1877 79.15150.3777 28.3134 0.3919 28.7053 7.66120.3711 8.032339,823.68 52 39,823.68
52 1.1232 3.8073 40,986.34
55 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 17 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3714 54.1596 16.21300.2076 6.6867 0.2858 6.9725 1.92460.2734 2.197922,273.35 88 22,273.35
88 0.5424 3.2775 23,263.60
95 Worker 7.9412 5.0281 62.93860.1701 21.6267 0.1062 21.7328 5.73670.0978 5.834417,550.32 64 17,550.32
64 0.5808 0.5298 17,722.73
60 Total 9.3125 59.1877 79.15150.3777 28.3134 0.3919 28.7053 7.66120.3711 8.032339,823.68 52 39,823.68
52 1.1232 3.8073 40,986.34
55 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 18 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3197 53.0730 15.83100.2033 6.6860 0.2799 6.9658 1.92430.2677 2.192021,824.17 05 21,824.17
05 0.5311 3.2171 22,796.13
16 Worker 7.4650 4.5115 58.97680.1644 21.6267 0.1015 21.7282 5.73670.0934 5.830117,126.91 91 17,126.91
91 0.5284 0.4952 17,287.70
42 Total 8.7847 57.5846 74.80780.3677 28.3126 0.3813 28.6940 7.66100.3611 8.022138,951.08 96 38,951.08
96 1.0595 3.7123 40,083.83
58 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 19 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3197 53.0730 15.83100.2033 6.6860 0.2799 6.9658 1.92430.2677 2.192021,824.17 05 21,824.17
05 0.5311 3.2171 22,796.13
16 Worker 7.4650 4.5115 58.97680.1644 21.6267 0.1015 21.7282 5.73670.0934 5.830117,126.91 91 17,126.91
91 0.5284 0.4952 17,287.70
42 Total 8.7847 57.5846 74.80780.3677 28.3126 0.3813 28.6940 7.66100.3611 8.022138,951.08 96 38,951.08
96 1.0595 3.7123 40,083.83
58 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 20 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2710 52.0079 15.51190.1992 6.6853 0.2728 6.9581 1.92410.2609 2.185021,386.35 95 21,386.35
95 0.5193 3.1586 22,340.59
92 Worker 7.0510 4.0890 55.61310.1592 21.6267 0.0968 21.7234 5.73670.0891 5.825816,721.00 59 16,721.00
59 0.4829 0.4665 16,872.09
56 Total 8.3220 56.0969 71.12500.3584 28.3120 0.3695 28.6815 7.66070.3500 8.010738,107.36 54 38,107.36
54 1.0022 3.6251 39,212.69
48 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 21 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2710 52.0079 15.51190.1992 6.6853 0.2728 6.9581 1.92410.2609 2.185021,386.35 95 21,386.35
95 0.5193 3.1586 22,340.59
92 Worker 7.0510 4.0890 55.61310.1592 21.6267 0.0968 21.7234 5.73670.0891 5.825816,721.00 59 16,721.00
59 0.4829 0.4665 16,872.09
56 Total 8.3220 56.0969 71.12500.3584 28.3120 0.3695 28.6815 7.66070.3500 8.010738,107.36 54 38,107.36
54 1.0022 3.6251 39,212.69
48 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 22 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2274 51.0319 15.23810.1949 6.6847 0.2663 6.9510 1.92380.2548 2.178620,929.04 66 20,929.04
66 0.5059 3.0967 21,864.51
49 Worker 6.6655 3.7356 52.72740.1544 21.6267 0.0915 21.7182 5.73670.0842 5.820916,346.31 10 16,346.31
10 0.4433 0.4424 16,489.23
61 Total 7.8929 54.7675 67.96550.3493 28.3114 0.3578 28.6692 7.66050.3390 7.999537,275.35 75 37,275.35
75 0.9492 3.5391 38,353.75
10 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 23 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2274 51.0319 15.23810.1949 6.6847 0.2663 6.9510 1.92380.2548 2.178620,929.04 66 20,929.04
66 0.5059 3.0967 21,864.51
49 Worker 6.6655 3.7356 52.72740.1544 21.6267 0.0915 21.7182 5.73670.0842 5.820916,346.31 10 16,346.31
10 0.4433 0.4424 16,489.23
61 Total 7.8929 54.7675 67.96550.3493 28.3114 0.3578 28.6692 7.66050.3390 7.999537,275.35 75 37,275.35
75 0.9492 3.5391 38,353.75
10 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.08470.0270 0.52760.5276 0.49630.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 24 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.1890 50.2204 15.01620.1908 6.6841 0.2606 6.9447 1.92360.2493 2.172920,500.31 99 20,500.31
99 0.4959 3.0380 21,418.03
74 Worker 6.3106 3.4442 50.31290.1501 21.6267 0.0859 21.7126 5.73670.0791 5.815716,010.46 83 16,010.46
83 0.4091 0.4224 16,146.58
32 Total 7.4996 53.6646 65.32910.3410 28.3108 0.3465 28.6573 7.66030.3284 7.988736,510.78 81 36,510.78
81 0.9050 3.4604 37,564.62
06 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.46030.0270 0.04080.0408 0.04080.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 25 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.1890 50.2204 15.01620.1908 6.6841 0.2606 6.9447 1.92360.2493 2.172920,500.31 99 20,500.31
99 0.4959 3.0380 21,418.03
74 Worker 6.3106 3.4442 50.31290.1501 21.6267 0.0859 21.7126 5.73670.0791 5.815716,010.46 83 16,010.46
83 0.4091 0.4224 16,146.58
32 Total 7.4996 53.6646 65.32910.3410 28.3108 0.3465 28.6573 7.66030.3284 7.988736,510.78 81 36,510.78
81 0.9050 3.4604 37,564.62
06 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.57800.0228 0.41850.4185 0.38500.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 1.10950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Total 2.0246 8.5816 14.57800.0228 0.41850.4185 0.38500.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 26 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0333 0.0182 0.26557.9000e-
004

0.1141 4.5000e-
004

0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e-
004

0.0307 84.4731 84.47312.1600e-
003

2.2300e-
003

85.1913
Total 0.0333 0.0182 0.26557.9000e-
004

0.1141 4.5000e-
004

0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e-
004

0.0307 84.4731 84.47312.1600e-
003

2.2300e-
003

85.1913
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Off-Road 0.2805 1.2154 17.29570.0228 0.03740.0374 0.03740.0374 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 1.10950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Total 1.3899 1.2154 17.29570.0228 0.03740.0374 0.03740.0374 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 27 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0333 0.0182 0.26557.9000e-
004

0.1141 4.5000e-
004

0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e-
004

0.0307 84.4731 84.47312.1600e-
003

2.2300e-
003

85.1913
Total 0.0333 0.0182 0.26557.9000e-
004

0.1141 4.5000e-
004

0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e-
004

0.0307 84.4731 84.47312.1600e-
003

2.2300e-
003

85.1913
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Archit. Coating 635.43950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.80912.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.05150.0515 0.0515281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319 Total 635.6103 1.1455 1.80912.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.05150.0515 0.0515281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 28 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2630 0.6893 10.06970.0301 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.14810.0158 1.16403,204.346 3 3,204.346
3 0.0819 0.0846 3,231.588
4 Total 1.2630 0.6893 10.06970.0301 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.14810.0158 1.16403,204.346 3 3,204.346
3 0.0819 0.0846 3,231.588
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Archit. Coating 635.43950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.83242.9700e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319
Total 635.4692 0.1288 1.83242.9700e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 29 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2630 0.6893 10.06970.0301 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.14810.0158 1.16403,204.346 3 3,204.346
3 0.0819 0.0846 3,231.588
4 Total 1.2630 0.6893 10.06970.0301 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.14810.0158 1.16403,204.346 3 3,204.346
3 0.0819 0.0846 3,231.588
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Archit. Coating 635.43950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.80912.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.05150.0515 0.0515281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319 Total 635.6103 1.1455 1.80912.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.05150.0515 0.0515281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 30 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.1938 0.6399 9.64900.0293 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.14810.0148 1.16303,143.894 9 3,143.894
9 0.0758 0.0812 3,169.983
2 Total 1.1938 0.6399 9.64900.0293 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.14810.0148 1.16303,143.894 9 3,143.894
9 0.0758 0.0812 3,169.983
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Archit. Coating 635.43950.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.83242.9700e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319
Total 635.4692 0.1288 1.83242.9700e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

3.9600e-
003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154281.8319
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 31 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.1938 0.6399 9.64900.0293 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.14810.0148 1.16303,143.894 9 3,143.894
9 0.0758 0.0812 3,169.983
2 Total 1.1938 0.6399 9.64900.0293 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.14810.0148 1.16303,143.894 9 3,143.894
9 0.0758 0.0812 3,169.983
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 32 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Mitigated 21.1116 19.0334 155.1707 0.171219.5314 0.1573 19.6887 5.2046 0.14645.3510 18,349.12 52 18,349.12
52 2.6067 1.5354 18,871.85
15 Unmitigated 21.1116 19.0334 155.1707 0.171219.5314 0.1573 19.6887 5.2046 0.14645.3510 18,349.12 52 18,349.12
52 2.6067 1.5354 18,871.85
15 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip RateUnmitigatedMitigated
Land UseWeekdaySaturdaySundayAnnual VMTAnnual VMT
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 2,031.00 2,031.00 2031.00282,840282,840 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3,487.96 3,487.96 3487.96790,323790,323 Hotel878.40 878.40878.40 419,565419,565
Industrial Park10,096.73 10,096.73 10096.737,777,1167,777,116 Parking Lot0.00 0.000.00
Total16,494.09 16,494.09 16,494.09 9,269,8449,269,844
MilesTrip %Trip Purpose %
Land UseH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWPrimaryDivertedPass-by Convenience Market with Gas
P

3.10 1.55 2.010.80 80.20 19.0014 2165
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Th

3.10 1.55 2.012.20 78.80 19.0029 2150
Hotel 3.101.55 2.01 19.4061.60 19.0058 384
Industrial Park 3.101.55 2.01 59.0028.00 13.0079 192
Parking Lot 3.101.55 2.01 0.000.00 0.000 00

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 33 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2MHDHHDOBUSUBUSMCYSBUSMH
Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Hotel 0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Industrial Park 0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726 Parking Lot 0.5591550.0562130.1821140.1224600.0216560.0055100.0133970.0095270.0008250.0006390.0249080.0008700.002726

5.0 Energy Detail
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.11821.4976 1.49761.4976 1.497623,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.11821.4976 1.49761.4976 1.497623,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 34 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UsekBTU/yrlb/daylb/day
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
119.17 1.2900e-
003

0.0117 9.8100e-
003

7.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

14.0200 14.0200 2.7000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

14.1033
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
8103.39 0.0874 0.7945 0.6673 4.7700e-
003

0.0604 0.06040.0604 0.0604953.3399 953.3399 0.0183 0.0175 959.0051 Hotel 7689.91 0.0829 0.75390.6333 4.5200e-
003

0.0573 0.05730.0573 0.0573904.6949 904.6949 0.0173 0.0166 910.0711 Industrial Park 185081 1.9960 18.1452 15.24190.1089 1.37901.3790 1.37901.3790 21,774.18 53 21,774.18
53 0.4173 0.3992 21,903.57
84 Parking Lot 0 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.11821.4976 1.49761.4976 1.497623,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 35 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Land UsekBTU/yrlb/daylb/day
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

0.11917 1.2900e-
003

0.0117 9.8100e-
003

7.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

8.9000e-
004

14.0200 14.0200 2.7000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

14.1033
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

8.10339 0.0874 0.7945 0.6673 4.7700e-
003

0.0604 0.06040.0604 0.0604953.3399 953.3399 0.0183 0.0175 959.0051 Hotel 7.68991 0.0829 0.75390.6333 4.5200e-
003

0.0573 0.05730.0573 0.0573904.6949 904.6949 0.0173 0.0166 910.0711 Industrial Park 185.081 1.9960 18.1452 15.24190.1089 1.37901.3790 1.37901.3790 21,774.18 53 21,774.18
53 0.4173 0.3992 21,903.57
84 Parking Lot 0 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.11821.4976 1.49761.4976 1.497623,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 36 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Categorylb/daylb/day
Mitigated 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Unmitigated 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
SubCategorylb/daylb/day
Architectural
Coating

13.57930.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Consumer
Products
113.99780.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Landscaping 0.0847 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Total 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 37 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
SubCategorylb/daylb/day
Architectural
Coating

13.57930.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Consumer
Products
113.99780.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.00000.0000
Landscaping 0.0847 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Total 127.6617 8.3400e-
003

0.9199 7.0000e-
005

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

3.2700e-
003

1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e-
003

2.1055
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment TypeNumberHours/DayDays/YearHorse PowerLoad FactorFuel Type Forklifts9512.00300890.20Diesel
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 38 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation
ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e
Equipment Typelb/daylb/day
Forklifts 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.21786.2442 6.24425.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.21786.2442 6.24425.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 UnMitigated/Mitigated

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment TypeNumberHours/DayHours/YearHorse PowerLoad FactorFuel Type Boilers
Equipment TypeNumberHeat Input/DayHeat Input/YearBoiler RatingFuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment TypeNumber
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 39 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.06 Total DPM (lbs) 1450.991562 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.328767123 Total DPM (g) 658169.7724 Construction Duration (days) 122 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.003860976 Total DPM (lbs) 40.10958904 Release Height (meters) 3
Total DPM (g) 18193.70959 Total Acreage 353.5
Start Date 9/1/2023 Max Horizontal (meters) 1,691.49
End Date 1/1/2024 Min Horizontal (meters) 845.74
Construction Days 122 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Setting U
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.21941 Population 528,001 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 1.202246575 Start Date 9/1/2023 Construction Duration (days) 366 End Date 1/25/2029
Total DPM (lbs) 440.0222466 Total Construction Days 1973 Total DPM (g) 199594.091 Total Years of Construction 5.41 Start Date 1/1/2024 Total Years of Operation 24.59
End Date 1/1/2025
Construction Days 366
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.1133
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.620821918
Construction Duration (days) 365
Total DPM (lbs) 226.6
Total DPM (g) 102785.76
Start Date 1/1/2025
End Date 1/1/2026
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.1256
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.688219178
Construction Duration (days) 365
Total DPM (lbs) 251.2
Total DPM (g) 113944.32
Start Date 1/1/2026
End Date 1/1/2027
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.124
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.679452055
Construction Duration (days) 365
Total DPM (lbs) 248
Total DPM (g) 112492.8
Start Date 1/1/2027
End Date 1/1/2028
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.1219
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.667945205
Construction Duration (days) 366
Total DPM (lbs) 244.4679452
Total DPM (g) 110890.6599
Start Date 1/1/2028
End Date 1/1/2029
Construction Days 366
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0045
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.024657534
Construction Duration (days) 24
Total DPM (lbs) 0.591780822
2027
2028
2029
2025
Construction
2023 Total
2024
2026
AttachmentC
Total DPM (g) 268.4317808
Start Date 1/1/2029
End Date 1/25/2029
Construction Days 24
AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112 07/10/24
10:16:56
TITLE: South Airport Industrial, Construction
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS **************************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.386E‐02 g/s 0.306E‐01 lb/hr
AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.270E‐08 g/(s‐m2) 0.214E‐07 lb/(hr‐m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 1691.49 meters 5549.51 feet
AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 845.74 meters 2774.74 feet
INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
RURAL OR URBAN: URBAN
POPULATION: 528001
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS ********************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON‐POINT SOURCES
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ************************** FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters‐5000. meters
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE 1‐HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL
SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1* 1.000 0.2134 25 925.0 WIN
* = worst case diagonal
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ AttachmentD
********************** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON: Winter
ALBEDO: 0. 35
BOWEN RATIO: 1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED

METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

YR MO DY JDY HR
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐
10 01 10 10 01
H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M‐O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.30 0.043‐9.000 0.020‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50

HT REF TA HT
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

10.0 310.0 2.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES **********************

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
DIST 1‐HR CONC DIST 1‐HR CONC
(m) (ug/m3) (m) (ug/m3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

1.00 0.1665 2525.00 0.5297E‐01

25.00 0.1682 2550.00 0.5243E‐01

50.00 0.1699 2575.00 0.5189E‐01

75.00 0.1716 2600.00 0.5137E‐01
100.00 0.1732 2625.00 0.5084E‐01
125.00 0.1749 2650.00 0.5033E‐01
150.00 0.1764 2675.00 0.4982E‐01
175.00 0.1780 2700.00 0.4933E‐01
200.00 0.1795 2725.00 0.4884E‐01
225.00 0.1810 2750.00 0.4836E‐01
250.00 0.1817 2775.00 0.4789E‐01
275.00 0.1815 2800.00 0.4743E‐01
300.00 0.1828 2825.00 0.4696E‐01
325.00 0.1841 2850.00 0.4651E‐01
350.00 0.1854 2875.00 0.4606E‐01
375.00 0.1866 2900.00 0.4562E‐01
400.00 0.1878 2925.00 0.4519E‐01
425.00 0.1890 2950.00 0.4477E‐01
450.00 0.1901 2975.00 0.4436E‐01
475.00 0.1912 3000.00 0.4396E‐01
500.00 0.1923 3025.00 0.4356E‐01
525.00 0.1934 3050.00 0.4316E‐01
550.00 0.1945 3075.00 0.4277E‐01
575.00 0.1955 3100.00 0.4239E‐01
600.00 0.1966 3125.00 0.4200E‐01
625.00 0.1976 3150.00 0.4163E‐01
650.00 0.1986 3175.00 0.4125E‐01
675.00 0.1996 3200.00 0.4089E‐01
700.00 0.2006 3225.00 0.4053E‐01
725.00 0.2028 3250.00 0.4018E‐01
750.00 0.2040 3275.00 0.3984E‐01
775.00 0.2071 3300.00 0.3950E‐01
800.00 0.2083 3325.00 0.3916E‐01
825.00 0.2094 3350.00 0.3883E‐01
850.00 0.2120 3375.00 0.3849E‐01
875.00 0.2131 3400.00 0.3817E‐01
900.00 0.2126 3425.00 0.3785E‐01
924.99 0.2134 3450.00 0.3753E‐01
950.00 0.1923 3475.00 0.3722E‐01
975.00 0.1723 3500.00 0.3692E‐01
1000.00 0.1588 3525.00 0.3662E‐01
1025.00 0.1479 3550.00 0.3633E‐01
1050.00 0.1405 3575.00 0.3604E‐01
1075.00 0.1342 3600.00 0.3575E‐01
1100.00 0.1289 3625.00 0.3547E‐01
1125.01 0.1241 3650.00 0.3519E‐01
1150.00 0.1202 3675.00 0.3491E‐01
1175.00 0.1169 3700.00 0.3463E‐01
1200.00 0.1139 3725.00 0.3436E‐01
1225.00 0.1111 3750.00 0.3409E‐01
1250.01 0.1084 3775.00 0.3382E‐01
1275.00 0.1067 3800.00 0.3356E‐01
1300.00 0.1040 3825.00 0.3330E‐01
1325.00 0.1016 3850.00 0.3304E‐01
1350.01 0.9948E‐01 3875.00 0.3279E‐01
1375.00 0.9742E‐01 3900.00 0.3254E‐01
1400.00 0.9546E‐01 3925.00 0.3230E‐01
1425.00 0.9358E‐01 3950.00 0.3206E‐01
1450.00 0.9178E‐01 3975.00 0.3182E‐01
1475.00 0.9006E‐01 4000.00 0.3159E‐01
1500.00 0.8840E‐01 4025.00 0.3136E‐01
1525.00 0.8695E‐01 4050.00 0.3114E‐01
1550.00 0.8565E‐01 4075.00 0.3091E‐01
1575.00 0.8439E‐01 4100.00 0.3069E‐01
1600.00 0.8317E‐01 4125.00 0.3047E‐01
1625.00 0.8197E‐01 4150.00 0.3025E‐01
1650.00 0.8080E‐01 4175.00 0.3003E‐01
1675.00 0.7967E‐01 4200.00 0.2982E‐01
1700.00 0.7856E‐01 4225.00 0.2961E‐01
1725.00 0.7749E‐01 4250.00 0.2940E‐01
1750.00 0.7644E‐01 4275.00 0.2919E‐01
1775.00 0.7542E‐01 4300.00 0.2899E‐01
1800.00 0.7442E‐01 4325.00 0.2879E‐01
1825.00 0.7346E‐01 4350.00 0.2859E‐01
1850.00 0.7249E‐01 4375.00 0.2839E‐01
1875.00 0.7155E‐01 4400.00 0.2820E‐01
1900.00 0.7064E‐01 4425.00 0.2801E‐01
1925.00 0.6975E‐01 4450.00 0.2782E‐01
1950.00 0.6888E‐01 4475.00 0.2763E‐01
1975.00 0.6803E‐01 4500.00 0.2744E‐01
2000.00 0.6720E‐01 4525.00 0.2726E‐01
2025.00 0.6639E‐01 4550.00 0.2708E‐01
2050.00 0.6559E‐01 4575.00 0.2691E‐01
2075.00 0.6480E‐01 4600.00 0.2673E‐01
2100.00 0.6403E‐01 4625.00 0.2655E‐01
2125.00 0.6328E‐01 4650.00 0.2638E‐01
2150.00 0.6253E‐01 4675.00 0.2621E‐01
2175.00 0.6180E‐01 4700.00 0.2603E‐01
2200.00 0.6109E‐01 4725.00 0.2587E‐01
2225.00 0.6040E‐01 4750.00 0.2570E‐01
2250.00 0.5972E‐01 4775.00 0.2553E‐01
2275.00 0.5906E‐01 4800.00 0.2537E‐01
2300.00 0.5840E‐01 4825.00 0.2521E‐01
2325.00 0.5775E‐01 4850.00 0.2505E‐01
2350.00 0.5712E‐01 4875.00 0.2490E‐01
2375.00 0.5649E‐01 4900.00 0.2474E‐01
2400.00 0.5588E‐01 4925.00 0.2459E‐01
2425.00 0.5528E‐01 4950.00 0.2444E‐01
2450.00 0.5469E‐01 4975.00 0.2429E‐01
2475.00 0.5410E‐01 5000.00 0.2414E‐01
2500.00 0.5353E‐01
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3‐hour, 8‐hour, and 24‐hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1‐hour concentration as referenced in

SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA‐454/R‐92‐019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance

MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED
1‐HOUR 3‐HOUR 8‐HOUR 24‐HOUR ANNUAL

CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC
PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLAT TERRAIN 0.2136 0.2136 0.2136 0.2136 N/A
DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 932.00 meters

IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.1665 0.1665 0.1665 0.1665 N/A
DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000‐‐2003); AttachmentE
2 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
3 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted 4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wroteʺpart Bʺpermits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 5 principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F.,2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F.,2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. andHagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F.,2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F.,2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. andHagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page1of12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Focus on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years of experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.