Agenda Packet — Salinas City Council, June 13, 2023 (part 6 of 10)

any required investigation and/or remediation and the government agency who will be responsible for providing appropriate regulatory oversight.

3. If any projects initiated as part of the proposed project require the importation of soil to backfill any excavated areas, proper sampling should be conducted to ensure that the imported soil is free of contamination. DTSC recommends the imported materials be characterized according to DTSC’s 2001 Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material.

4. If any sites included as part of the proposed project have been used for agricultural, weed abatement or related activities, proper investigation for organochlorinated pesticides should be discussed in the MND. DTSC recommends the current and former agricultural lands be evaluated in accordance with DTSC’s 2008 Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision).

DTSC appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND. Should you need any assistance with an environmental investigation, please visit DTSC’s Site Mitigation and Restoration Program page to apply for lead agency oversight. Additional information regarding voluntary agreements with DTSC can be found at DTSC’s Brownfield website.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 255-3710 or via email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Gavin McCreary
Project Manager
Site Evaluation and Remediation Unit
Site Mitigation and Restoration Program
Department of Toxic Substances Control
cc: (via email)
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse
[email protected]
Mr. Dave Kereazis
Office of Planning & Environmental Analysis
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]

1.3 1.4

1.5 1.6
139
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project Responses to Comments on the IS-MND Response to Comments
Letter 1
COMMENTER: Gavin McCreary, Project Manager, Department of Toxic Substances Control DATE: February 9, 2023
Response 1.1
The commenter states that the Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) responses will pertain to potential issues related to groundbreaking activities, work near a roadway, importation of backfill soil, and/or work on or in close proximity to an agricultural or former agricultural site.

This comment is noted and not related to the adequacy or conclusions of the IS-MND. No revisions to the IS-MND are required in response to this comment.

Response 1.2
The commenter suggests that a qualified regulatory agency, such as the DTSC, RWQCB, or other qualified local agency that meets the requirements of Health and Safety Code section 101480, should provide regulatory concurrence that the project site is safe for construction and the proposed use.

Health and Safety Code section 101480 authorizes a responsible party, as defined, to request that a local officer supervise remedial action if a release of waste occurs and remedial action is required.

As stated in Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Initial Study, no items of potential environmental concern were identified at the project site. Therefore, oversight of a qualified regulatory investigation and no remedial action would be required at this time. No revisions to the IS-MND are required in response to this comment.

Response 1.3
The commenter suggests that the IS-MND should acknowledge the potential for historic or future activities on or near the project site to result in the release of hazardous wastes/substances on the project site. The commenter states that the IS-MND should also identify the mechanism(s) to initiate any required investigation and/or remediation and the government agency who will be responsible for providing appropriate regulatory oversight.

Please refer to Section 5, Cultural Resources, of the Initial Study for additional information on historic uses of the project site. As discussed therein, it was found that the project site was generally undeveloped until the 1970s. As stated in Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Initial Study, future operation activities on the project site are not anticipated to release hazardous wastes or substances, but construction activities could result in the transport, storage, or use of potentially hazardous materials. The project would be required to comply with various federal, state, and local regulations, including those set forth by DTSC, which are designed to reduce risks associated with hazardous materials, including potential risks associated with upset or accident conditions. No items of potential environmental concern were identified at the project site. Therefore, there are no required investigations or remediation needed, and no revisions to the IS-MND are warranted. 140
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project Responses to Comments on the IS-MND Response to Comments
Response 1.4
The commenter states that proper sampling should be conducted to ensure all backfill soil is free of contamination.

According to DTSC, there are currently no established standards within applicable statues and regulations that address environmental requirements for imported fill material.1 Sampling of backfill soil would not be required. Additionally, the property owner would be liable if contaminated soil were imported to the site. No revisions to the IS-MND are required in response to this comment.

Response 1.5
The commenter states that if any part of the project site has been used for agricultural, weed abatement or related activities, proper investigation for organochlorinated pesticides should be discussed in the IS-MND.

Based on review of historical topographic maps from 1910 to 1964, the project site has not been used for agricultural purposes. Furthermore, the project site has not been used for weed abatement or related activities. As discussed within Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, compliance with existing DTSC regulations would reduce the risk of potential release of hazardous materials during demolition, dewatering, soil disturbance/grading, and construction. No revisions to the ISMND are required in response to this comment.

Response 1.6
The commenter expresses gratitude for inclusion in the public comment period for the proposed project and links several resources such as the Site Mitigation and Restoration Program for additional suggestions.

This comment is noted and not related to the adequacy or conclusions of the IS-MND. No revisions to the IS-MND are required in response to this comment. 1 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2017. DTSC Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material Fact Sheet. https://dtsc.ca.gov/information-advisory-clean-imported-fill-material-fact-sheet/ (accessed March 2023). 141
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project Revisions to the Draft IS-MND
Response to Comments
Revisions to the Draft IS-MND
The following pages provide a summary record of proposed changes to the text of the Draft IS-MND.

None of the changes would warrant recirculation of the IS-MND pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5. The amendments serve to correct typographical errors or clarify and strengthen the content of the IS-MND, but do not introduce significant new information.

Changes in text are signified by strikeouts (strikeouts) where text is removed and by underlined font (underline font) where text is added. Other minor clarifications and corrections to typographical errors are also shown as corrected in this format, including corrections not based on responses to comments.

Cultural Resources
Section 5, Cultural Resources, page 40 and 41 of the Draft IS-MND are revised as follows:

In August 2021, Rincon Consultants, Inc. prepared a cultural resources study (Appendix C Appendix E) for the project…
Given the negative results of Appendix C Appendix E, the project site is considered to have low archaeological sensitivity.

Appendices
Appendix E, Cultural Resources Study, has been included to the Final IS-MND. The study, which was referenced and incorporated into the analysis in Section 5, Cultural Resources, was erroneously referred to as Appendix C and unintentionally omitted from the Draft IS-MND Appendices. It has been added as Appendix E to the Final IS-MND.
142
Appendix A
CalEEMod Output Files
1 Preston Street AQ
Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics - Project is in Salinas, Monterey County --> MBARD. Utility provider would be Central Coast Community Energy. The CO2e rate is 151 pounds per MWh
Land Use - Project is 76 dwelling units (approx 2,210 sf) and 166 parking lot spaces. Acreage is approximately 2.6 Construction Phase - Default construction schedule
Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment
Architectural Coating - MBARD Rule 426 architectural coatings 50 g/L for nonflat coatings and 100 g/L for traffic markings Vehicle Trips - Default trip gen rate
Woodstoves -
Area Coating - MBARD Rule 426 architectural coatings 50 g/L for nonflat coatings and 100 g/L for traffic markings Water And Wastewater - No septic tanks proposed. Changed the percentage and added to aerobic Area Mitigation -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 166.00 Space 0.00 66,400.00 0
Apartments Mid Rise 76.00 Dwelling Unit 2.60 167,960.00 217

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.8 Precipitation Freq (Days) 53

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company User Defined
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
151 CH4 Intensity 0
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Water Mitigation - 2019 Title 24 standards require a 20% reduction for indoor water use

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 150.00 100.00
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 100.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 150 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 100 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 100 50
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingValue 100 150
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorValu e
50 100
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialInteriorValu e
50 100
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 76,000.00 167,960.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.49 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.00 2.60
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 0 151
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 97.79
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 97.79
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.7680 1.7427 1.9672 4.0600e0030.1117 0.0738 0.1855 0.0343 0.0706 0.1048 0.0000 350.1704 350.1704 0.0511 8.0600e003353.8507 Maximum 0.7680 1.7427 1.9672 4.0600e0030.1117 0.0738 0.1855 0.0343 0.0706 0.1048 0.0000 350.1704 350.1704 0.0511 8.0600e003353.8507 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.7680 1.7427 1.9672 4.0600e0030.1117 0.0738 0.1855 0.0343 0.0706 0.1048 0.0000 350.1701 350.1701 0.0511 8.0600e003353.8505 Maximum 0.7680 1.7427 1.9672 4.0600e0030.1117 0.0738 0.1855 0.0343 0.0706 0.1048 0.0000 350.1701 350.1701 0.0511 8.0600e003353.8505 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-2-2023 4-1-2023 0.5380 0.5380
2 4-2-2023 7-1-2023 0.5445 0.5445
3 7-2-2023 9-30-2023 0.5445 0.5445
Highest 0.5445 0.5445

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.7375 9.0500e0030.7856 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2400e0030.0000 1.3154 Energy 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 55.7113 55.7113 6.5000e0046.2000e00455.9133 Mobile 0.2296 0.3200 2.1682 4.3100e0030.4212 3.9300e0030.4252 0.1126 3.6700e0030.1163 0.0000 404.4946 404.4946 0.0283 0.0205 411.2944 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.0966 0.0000 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7519 2.5835 4.3354 0.0458 3.8100e0036.6157 Total 0.9705 0.3584 2.9663 4.5400e0030.4212 0.0107 0.4319 0.1126 0.0104 0.1230 8.8485 464.0739 472.9224 0.4953 0.0249 492.7203 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.7375 9.0500e0030.7856 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2400e0030.0000 1.3154 Energy 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 55.7113 55.7113 6.5000e0046.2000e00455.9133 Mobile 0.2296 0.3200 2.1682 4.3100e0030.4212 3.9300e0030.4252 0.1126 3.6700e0030.1163 0.0000 404.4946 404.4946 0.0283 0.0205 411.2944 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.0966 0.0000 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4015 2.2165 3.6180 0.0366 3.0500e0035.4422 Total 0.9705 0.3584 2.9663 4.5400e0030.4212 0.0107 0.4319 0.1126 0.0104 0.1230 8.4981 463.7068 472.2049 0.4862 0.0241 491.5468 Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.96 0.08 0.15 1.85 3.05 0.24 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4 Paving Paving 11/17/2023 11/30/2023 5 10
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/1/2023 12/14/2023 5 10 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Residential Indoor: 340,119; Residential Outdoor: 113,373; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 3,984 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 83.00 19.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 17.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0803 0.0803 0.0000 0.0000 0.0811 Total 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0803 0.0803 0.0000 0.0000 0.0811 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.3900e0030.0000 2.3900e0032.6000e0040.0000 2.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9500e0030.0214 0.0147 4.0000e0058.1000e0048.1000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 3.2317 3.2317 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2578 Total 1.9500e0030.0214 0.0147 4.0000e0052.3900e0038.1000e0043.2000e0032.6000e0047.5000e0041.0100e0030.0000 3.2317 3.2317 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2578 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0213 0.0000 0.0213 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.0000e0030.0434 0.0261 6.0000e0051.8100e0031.8100e0031.6700e0031.6700e0030.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4751 Total 4.0000e0030.0434 0.0261 6.0000e0050.0213 1.8100e0030.0231 0.0103 1.6700e0030.0119 0.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4751 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e0048.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.2007 0.2007 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2028 Total 1.0000e0048.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.2007 0.2007 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2028 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0213 0.0000 0.0213 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.0000e0030.0434 0.0261 6.0000e0051.8100e0031.8100e0031.6700e0031.6700e0030.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4751 Total 4.0000e0030.0434 0.0261 6.0000e0050.0213 1.8100e0030.0231 0.0103 1.6700e0030.0119 0.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4751 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1885 1.4986 1.5636 2.7500e0030.0675 0.0675 0.0647 0.0647 0.0000 228.4723 228.4723 0.0432 0.0000 229.5525 Total 0.1885 1.4986 1.5636 2.7500e0030.0675 0.0675 0.0647 0.0647 0.0000 228.4723 228.4723 0.0432 0.0000 229.5525 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.9700e0030.1064 0.0335 4.3000e0040.0138 6.8000e0040.0145 3.9900e0036.5000e0044.6400e0030.0000 41.5639 41.5639 3.6000e0046.1100e00343.3925 Worker 0.0298 0.0229 0.2562 6.6000e0040.0726 4.7000e0040.0731 0.0193 4.4000e0040.0198 0.0000 61.0868 61.0868 2.1500e0031.9100e00361.7112 Total 0.0328 0.1292 0.2897 1.0900e0030.0864 1.1500e0030.0876 0.0233 1.0900e0030.0244 0.0000 102.6507 102.6507 2.5100e0038.0200e003105.1037 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1885 1.4986 1.5636 2.7500e0030.0675 0.0675 0.0647 0.0647 0.0000 228.4720 228.4720 0.0432 0.0000 229.5522 Total 0.1885 1.4986 1.5636 2.7500e0030.0675 0.0675 0.0647 0.0647 0.0000 228.4720 228.4720 0.0432 0.0000 229.5522 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.4000e0041.9000e0042.1000e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.5018 0.5018 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5069 Total 2.4000e0041.9000e0042.1000e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.5018 0.5018 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5069 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8178 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8178 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e0042.1000e0042.3800e0031.0000e0056.8000e0040.0000 6.8000e0041.8000e0040.0000 1.8000e0040.0000 0.5687 0.5687 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5745 Total 2.8000e0042.1000e0042.3800e0031.0000e0056.8000e0040.0000 6.8000e0041.8000e0040.0000 1.8000e0040.0000 0.5687 0.5687 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5745 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.5347 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.6000e0046.5100e0039.0600e0031.0000e0053.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0040.0000 1.2766 1.2766 8.0000e0050.0000 1.2785 Total 0.5357 6.5100e0039.0600e0031.0000e0053.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0040.0000 1.2766 1.2766 8.0000e0050.0000 1.2785 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2296 0.3200 2.1682 4.3100e0030.4212 3.9300e0030.4252 0.1126 3.6700e0030.1163 0.0000 404.4946 404.4946 0.0283 0.0205 411.2944 Unmitigated 0.2296 0.3200 2.1682 4.3100e0030.4212 3.9300e0030.4252 0.1126 3.6700e0030.1163 0.0000 404.4946 404.4946 0.0283 0.0205 411.2944

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 413.44 373.16 310.84 1,132,272 1,132,272 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 413.44 373.16 310.84 1,132,272 1,132,272
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 10.80 7.30 7.50 44.00 18.80 37.20 86 11 3 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.512341 0.052370 0.194493 0.150484 0.029151 0.007004 0.010494 0.009415 0.001203 0.000586 0.027411 0.001303 0.003746 Parking Lot 0.512341 0.052370 0.194493 0.150484 0.029151 0.007004 0.010494 0.009415 0.001203 0.000586 0.027411 0.001303 0.003746

5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182 21.7182 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182 21.7182 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182 NaturalGas
Mitigated

3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
637008 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
637008 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
293849 20.1264 0.0000 0.0000 20.1264
Parking Lot 23240 1.5918 0.0000 0.0000 1.5918
Total 21.7182 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
293849 20.1264 0.0000 0.0000 20.1264
Parking Lot 23240 1.5918 0.0000 0.0000 1.5918
Total 21.7182 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.7375 9.0500e0030.7856 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2400e0030.0000 1.3154 Unmitigated 0.7375 9.0500e0030.7856 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2400e0030.0000 1.3154 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0535 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.6603 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0238 9.0500e0030.7856 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2400e0030.0000 1.3154 Total 0.7375 9.0500e0030.7856 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2400e0030.0000 1.3154 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0535 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.6603 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0238 9.0500e0030.7856 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2400e0030.0000 1.3154 Total 0.7375 9.0500e0030.7856 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2400e0030.0000 1.3154 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 3.6180 0.0366 3.0500e0035.4422
Unmitigated 4.3354 0.0458 3.8100e0036.6157

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

4.95171 /

3.12173

4.3354 0.0458 3.8100e0036.6157
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 4.3354 0.0458 3.8100e0036.6157
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

3.96136 /

3.12173

3.6180 0.0366 3.0500e0035.4422
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.6180 0.0366 3.0500e0035.4422
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814
Unmitigated 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

34.96 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

34.96 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:46 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 Preston Street AQ
Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer
Project Characteristics - Project is in Salinas, Monterey County --> MBARD. Utility provider would be Central Coast Community Energy. The CO2e rate is 151 pounds per MWh
Land Use - Project is 76 dwelling units (approx 2,210 sf) and 166 parking lot spaces. Acreage is approximately 2.6 Construction Phase - Default construction schedule
Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment
Architectural Coating - MBARD Rule 426 architectural coatings 50 g/L for nonflat coatings and 100 g/L for traffic markings Vehicle Trips - Default trip gen rate
Woodstoves -
Area Coating - MBARD Rule 426 architectural coatings 50 g/L for nonflat coatings and 100 g/L for traffic markings Water And Wastewater - No septic tanks proposed. Changed the percentage and added to aerobic Area Mitigation -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 166.00 Space 0.00 66,400.00 0
Apartments Mid Rise 76.00 Dwelling Unit 2.60 167,960.00 217

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.8 Precipitation Freq (Days) 53

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company User Defined
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
151 CH4 Intensity 0
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Water Mitigation - 2019 Title 24 standards require a 20% reduction for indoor water use

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 150.00 100.00
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 100.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 150 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 100 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 100 50
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingValue 100 150
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorValu e
50 100
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialInteriorValu e
50 100
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 76,000.00 167,960.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.49 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.00 2.60
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 0 151
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 97.79
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 97.79
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 107.1914 14.7377 16.9612 0.0353 7.1647 0.6241 7.7696 3.4465 0.5979 4.0030 0.0000 3,350.127 7 3,350.127
7 0.7700 0.0787 3,384.992
3 Maximum 107.1914 14.7377 16.9612 0.0353 7.1647 0.6241 7.7696 3.4465 0.5979 4.0030 0.0000 3,350.127 7 3,350.127
7 0.7700 0.0787 3,384.992
3 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 107.1914 14.7377 16.9612 0.0353 7.1647 0.6241 7.7696 3.4465 0.5979 4.0030 0.0000 3,350.127 7 3,350.127
7 0.7700 0.0787 3,384.992
3 Maximum 107.1914 14.7377 16.9612 0.0353 7.1647 0.6241 7.7696 3.4465 0.5979 4.0030 0.0000 3,350.127 7 3,350.127
7 0.7700 0.0787 3,384.992
3 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 Energy 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Mobile 1.3991 1.7022 12.3993 0.0259 2.5131 0.0227 2.5359 0.6703 0.0213 0.6915 2,683.165 5 2,683.165
5 0.1700 0.1234 2,724.197
9 Total 5.5188 1.9354 18.7522 0.0273 2.5131 0.0705 2.5837 0.6703 0.0691 0.7393 0.0000 2,899.812 6 2,899.812
6 0.1849 0.1272 2,942.338
3 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 Energy 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Mobile 1.3991 1.7022 12.3993 0.0259 2.5131 0.0227 2.5359 0.6703 0.0213 0.6915 2,683.165 5 2,683.165
5 0.1700 0.1234 2,724.197
9 Total 5.5188 1.9354 18.7522 0.0273 2.5131 0.0705 2.5837 0.6703 0.0691 0.7393 0.0000 2,899.812 6 2,899.812
6 0.1849 0.1272 2,942.338
3 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/2/2023 1/4/2023 5 3 2 Grading Grading 1/5/2023 1/12/2023 5 6
3 Building Construction Building Construction 1/13/2023 11/16/2023 5 220 4 Paving Paving 11/17/2023 11/30/2023 5 10
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/1/2023 12/14/2023 5 10 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 340,119; Residential Outdoor: 113,373; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 3,984 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 83.00 19.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 17.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 0.5419 0.5419 0.4985 0.4985 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Total 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 1.5908 0.5419 2.1326 0.1718 0.4985 0.6703 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0265 0.0176 0.2358 6.1000e0040.0657 4.2000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.8000e0040.0178 62.1115 62.1115 1.9600e0031.6900e00362.6654 Total 0.0265 0.0176 0.2358 6.1000e0040.0657 4.2000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.8000e0040.0178 62.1115 62.1115 1.9600e0031.6900e00362.6654 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 0.5419 0.5419 0.4985 0.4985 0.0000 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Total 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 1.5908 0.5419 2.1326 0.1718 0.4985 0.6703 0.0000 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0265 0.0176 0.2358 6.1000e0040.0657 4.2000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.8000e0040.0178 62.1115 62.1115 1.9600e0031.6900e00362.6654 Total 0.0265 0.0176 0.2358 6.1000e0040.0657 4.2000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.8000e0040.0178 62.1115 62.1115 1.9600e0031.6900e00362.6654 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 7.0826 0.6044 7.6869 3.4247 0.5560 3.9807 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0332 0.0220 0.2947 7.6000e0040.0822 5.2000e0040.0827 0.0218 4.8000e0040.0223 77.6394 77.6394 2.4500e0032.1200e00378.3318 Total 0.0332 0.0220 0.2947 7.6000e0040.0822 5.2000e0040.0827 0.0218 4.8000e0040.0223 77.6394 77.6394 2.4500e0032.1200e00378.3318 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 7.0826 0.6044 7.6869 3.4247 0.5560 3.9807 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0332 0.0220 0.2947 7.6000e0040.0822 5.2000e0040.0827 0.0218 4.8000e0040.0223 77.6394 77.6394 2.4500e0032.1200e00378.3318 Total 0.0332 0.0220 0.2947 7.6000e0040.0822 5.2000e0040.0827 0.0218 4.8000e0040.0223 77.6394 77.6394 2.4500e0032.1200e00378.3318 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0275 0.9314 0.3009 3.9200e0030.1287 6.1700e0030.1349 0.0371 5.9000e0030.0430 416.1973 416.1973 3.6600e0030.0611 434.4905 Worker 0.2753 0.1824 2.4459 6.3000e0030.6818 4.3100e0030.6861 0.1809 3.9700e0030.1848 644.4071 644.4071 0.0204 0.0176 650.1539 Total 0.3027 1.1137 2.7468 0.0102 0.8105 0.0105 0.8210 0.2179 9.8700e0030.2278 1,060.604 4 1,060.604
4 0.0240 0.0787 1,084.644
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0275 0.9314 0.3009 3.9200e0030.1287 6.1700e0030.1349 0.0371 5.9000e0030.0430 416.1973 416.1973 3.6600e0030.0611 434.4905 Worker 0.2753 0.1824 2.4459 6.3000e0030.6818 4.3100e0030.6861 0.1809 3.9700e0030.1848 644.4071 644.4071 0.0204 0.0176 650.1539 Total 0.3027 1.1137 2.7468 0.0102 0.8105 0.0105 0.8210 0.2179 9.8700e0030.2278 1,060.604 4 1,060.604
4 0.0240 0.0787 1,084.644
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0498 0.0330 0.4420 1.1400e0030.1232 7.8000e0040.1240 0.0327 7.2000e0040.0334 116.4591 116.4591 3.6800e0033.1800e003117.4977 Total 0.0498 0.0330 0.4420 1.1400e0030.1232 7.8000e0040.1240 0.0327 7.2000e0040.0334 116.4591 116.4591 3.6800e0033.1800e003117.4977 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0498 0.0330 0.4420 1.1400e0030.1232 7.8000e0040.1240 0.0327 7.2000e0040.0334 116.4591 116.4591 3.6800e0033.1800e003117.4977 Total 0.0498 0.0330 0.4420 1.1400e0030.1232 7.8000e0040.1240 0.0327 7.2000e0040.0334 116.4591 116.4591 3.6800e0033.1800e003117.4977 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 106.9434 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 107.1350 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0564 0.0374 0.5010 1.2900e0030.1397 8.8000e0040.1405 0.0370 8.1000e0040.0379 131.9870 131.9870 4.1700e0033.6000e003133.1640 Total 0.0564 0.0374 0.5010 1.2900e0030.1397 8.8000e0040.1405 0.0370 8.1000e0040.0379 131.9870 131.9870 4.1700e0033.6000e003133.1640 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 106.9434 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 107.1350 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0564 0.0374 0.5010 1.2900e0030.1397 8.8000e0040.1405 0.0370 8.1000e0040.0379 131.9870 131.9870 4.1700e0033.6000e003133.1640 Total 0.0564 0.0374 0.5010 1.2900e0030.1397 8.8000e0040.1405 0.0370 8.1000e0040.0379 131.9870 131.9870 4.1700e0033.6000e003133.1640 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.3991 1.7022 12.3993 0.0259 2.5131 0.0227 2.5359 0.6703 0.0213 0.6915 2,683.165 5 2,683.165
5 0.1700 0.1234 2,724.197
9 Unmitigated 1.3991 1.7022 12.3993 0.0259 2.5131 0.0227 2.5359 0.6703 0.0213 0.6915 2,683.165 5 2,683.165
5 0.1700 0.1234 2,724.197
9 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.512341 0.052370 0.194493 0.150484 0.029151 0.007004 0.010494 0.009415 0.001203 0.000586 0.027411 0.001303 0.003746 Parking Lot 0.512341 0.052370 0.194493 0.150484 0.029151 0.007004 0.010494 0.009415 0.001203 0.000586 0.027411 0.001303 0.003746

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
1745.23 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.74523 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 Unmitigated 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2930 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.6179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.1900 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 11.5995 Total 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.2930 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.6179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.1900 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 11.5995 Total 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:43 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 Preston Street AQ
Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter
Project Characteristics - Project is in Salinas, Monterey County --> MBARD. Utility provider would be Central Coast Community Energy. The CO2e rate is 151 pounds per MWh
Land Use - Project is 76 dwelling units (approx 2,210 sf) and 166 parking lot spaces. Acreage is approximately 2.6 Construction Phase - Default construction schedule
Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment
Architectural Coating - MBARD Rule 426 architectural coatings 50 g/L for nonflat coatings and 100 g/L for traffic markings Vehicle Trips - Default trip gen rate
Woodstoves -
Area Coating - MBARD Rule 426 architectural coatings 50 g/L for nonflat coatings and 100 g/L for traffic markings Water And Wastewater - No septic tanks proposed. Changed the percentage and added to aerobic Area Mitigation -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 166.00 Space 0.00 66,400.00 0
Apartments Mid Rise 76.00 Dwelling Unit 2.60 167,960.00 217

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.8 Precipitation Freq (Days) 53

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company User Defined
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
151 CH4 Intensity 0
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Water Mitigation - 2019 Title 24 standards require a 20% reduction for indoor water use

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 150.00 100.00
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 100.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 150 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 100 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 100 50
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingValue 100 150
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorValu e
50 100
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialInteriorValu e
50 100
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 76,000.00 167,960.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.49 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.00 2.60
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 0 151
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 97.79
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 97.79
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 107.1950 14.8383 16.9465 0.0349 7.1647 0.6241 7.7696 3.4465 0.5979 4.0030 0.0000 3,316.334 2 3,316.334
2 0.7703 0.0817 3,352.176
9 Maximum 107.1950 14.8383 16.9465 0.0349 7.1647 0.6241 7.7696 3.4465 0.5979 4.0030 0.0000 3,316.334 2 3,316.334
2 0.7703 0.0817 3,352.176
9 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 107.1950 14.8383 16.9465 0.0349 7.1647 0.6241 7.7696 3.4465 0.5979 4.0030 0.0000 3,316.334 2 3,316.334
2 0.7703 0.0817 3,352.176
9 Maximum 107.1950 14.8383 16.9465 0.0349 7.1647 0.6241 7.7696 3.4465 0.5979 4.0030 0.0000 3,316.334 2 3,316.334
2 0.7703 0.0817 3,352.176
9 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 Energy 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Mobile 1.3402 1.9519 13.3949 0.0249 2.5131 0.0227 2.5359 0.6703 0.0213 0.6915 2,573.883 9 2,573.883
9 0.1906 0.1356 2,619.052
8 Total 5.4599 2.1851 19.7477 0.0262 2.5131 0.0705 2.5837 0.6703 0.0691 0.7393 0.0000 2,790.531 0 2,790.531
0 0.2055 0.1393 2,837.193
1 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 Energy 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Mobile 1.3402 1.9519 13.3949 0.0249 2.5131 0.0227 2.5359 0.6703 0.0213 0.6915 2,573.883 9 2,573.883
9 0.1906 0.1356 2,619.052
8 Total 5.4599 2.1851 19.7477 0.0262 2.5131 0.0705 2.5837 0.6703 0.0691 0.7393 0.0000 2,790.531 0 2,790.531
0 0.2055 0.1393 2,837.193
1 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 340,119; Residential Outdoor: 113,373; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 3,984 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 83.00 19.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 17.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 0.5419 0.5419 0.4985 0.4985 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Total 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 1.5908 0.5419 2.1326 0.1718 0.4985 0.6703 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0282 0.0220 0.2335 5.7000e0040.0657 4.2000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.8000e0040.0178 58.7816 58.7816 2.2100e0031.9700e00359.4240 Total 0.0282 0.0220 0.2335 5.7000e0040.0657 4.2000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.8000e0040.0178 58.7816 58.7816 2.2100e0031.9700e00359.4240 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 0.5419 0.5419 0.4985 0.4985 0.0000 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Total 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 1.5908 0.5419 2.1326 0.1718 0.4985 0.6703 0.0000 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0282 0.0220 0.2335 5.7000e0040.0657 4.2000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.8000e0040.0178 58.7816 58.7816 2.2100e0031.9700e00359.4240 Total 0.0282 0.0220 0.2335 5.7000e0040.0657 4.2000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.8000e0040.0178 58.7816 58.7816 2.2100e0031.9700e00359.4240 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 7.0826 0.6044 7.6869 3.4247 0.5560 3.9807 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0353 0.0275 0.2918 7.2000e0040.0822 5.2000e0040.0827 0.0218 4.8000e0040.0223 73.4770 73.4770 2.7600e0032.4600e00374.2799 Total 0.0353 0.0275 0.2918 7.2000e0040.0822 5.2000e0040.0827 0.0218 4.8000e0040.0223 73.4770 73.4770 2.7600e0032.4600e00374.2799 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 7.0826 0.6044 7.6869 3.4247 0.5560 3.9807 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0353 0.0275 0.2918 7.2000e0040.0822 5.2000e0040.0827 0.0218 4.8000e0040.0223 73.4770 73.4770 2.7600e0032.4600e00374.2799 Total 0.0353 0.0275 0.2918 7.2000e0040.0822 5.2000e0040.0827 0.0218 4.8000e0040.0223 73.4770 73.4770 2.7600e0032.4600e00374.2799 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0267 0.9863 0.3100 3.9300e0030.1287 6.1900e0030.1349 0.0371 5.9200e0030.0430 416.9522 416.9522 3.5900e0030.0613 435.3055 Worker 0.2927 0.2281 2.4221 5.9600e0030.6818 4.3100e0030.6861 0.1809 3.9700e0030.1848 609.8587 609.8587 0.0229 0.0204 616.5235 Total 0.3194 1.2144 2.7320 9.8900e0030.8105 0.0105 0.8210 0.2179 9.8900e0030.2278 1,026.810 9 1,026.810
9 0.0265 0.0817 1,051.829
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0267 0.9863 0.3100 3.9300e0030.1287 6.1900e0030.1349 0.0371 5.9200e0030.0430 416.9522 416.9522 3.5900e0030.0613 435.3055 Worker 0.2927 0.2281 2.4221 5.9600e0030.6818 4.3100e0030.6861 0.1809 3.9700e0030.1848 609.8587 609.8587 0.0229 0.0204 616.5235 Total 0.3194 1.2144 2.7320 9.8900e0030.8105 0.0105 0.8210 0.2179 9.8900e0030.2278 1,026.810 9 1,026.810
9 0.0265 0.0817 1,051.829
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0529 0.0412 0.4377 1.0800e0030.1232 7.8000e0040.1240 0.0327 7.2000e0040.0334 110.2154 110.2154 4.1400e0033.6900e003111.4199 Total 0.0529 0.0412 0.4377 1.0800e0030.1232 7.8000e0040.1240 0.0327 7.2000e0040.0334 110.2154 110.2154 4.1400e0033.6900e003111.4199 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0529 0.0412 0.4377 1.0800e0030.1232 7.8000e0040.1240 0.0327 7.2000e0040.0334 110.2154 110.2154 4.1400e0033.6900e003111.4199 Total 0.0529 0.0412 0.4377 1.0800e0030.1232 7.8000e0040.1240 0.0327 7.2000e0040.0334 110.2154 110.2154 4.1400e0033.6900e003111.4199 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 106.9434 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 107.1350 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0600 0.0467 0.4961 1.2200e0030.1397 8.8000e0040.1405 0.0370 8.1000e0040.0379 124.9108 124.9108 4.6900e0034.1900e003126.2759 Total 0.0600 0.0467 0.4961 1.2200e0030.1397 8.8000e0040.1405 0.0370 8.1000e0040.0379 124.9108 124.9108 4.6900e0034.1900e003126.2759 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 106.9434 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 107.1350 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0600 0.0467 0.4961 1.2200e0030.1397 8.8000e0040.1405 0.0370 8.1000e0040.0379 124.9108 124.9108 4.6900e0034.1900e003126.2759 Total 0.0600 0.0467 0.4961 1.2200e0030.1397 8.8000e0040.1405 0.0370 8.1000e0040.0379 124.9108 124.9108 4.6900e0034.1900e003126.2759 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.3402 1.9519 13.3949 0.0249 2.5131 0.0227 2.5359 0.6703 0.0213 0.6915 2,573.883 9 2,573.883
9 0.1906 0.1356 2,619.052
8 Unmitigated 1.3402 1.9519 13.3949 0.0249 2.5131 0.0227 2.5359 0.6703 0.0213 0.6915 2,573.883 9 2,573.883
9 0.1906 0.1356 2,619.052
8 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.512341 0.052370 0.194493 0.150484 0.029151 0.007004 0.010494 0.009415 0.001203 0.000586 0.027411 0.001303 0.003746 Parking Lot 0.512341 0.052370 0.194493 0.150484 0.029151 0.007004 0.010494 0.009415 0.001203 0.000586 0.027411 0.001303 0.003746

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
1745.23 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.74523 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0188 0.1608 0.0684 1.0300e0030.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 205.3208 205.3208 3.9400e0033.7600e003206.5409 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 Unmitigated 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.2930 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.6179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.1900 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 11.5995 Total 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.2930 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.6179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.1900 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 11.5995 Total 4.1009 0.0724 6.2844 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0000 11.3263 11.3263 0.0109 0.0000 11.5995 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 23 Date: 4/7/2022 7:41 PM 1 Preston Street AQ - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 Preston Street GHG
Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics - Project is in Salinas, Monterey County --> MBARD. Utility provider would be Central Coast Community Energy. The CO2e rate is 151 pounds per MWh
Land Use - Project is 76 dwelling units (approx 2,210 sf) and 166 parking lot spaces. Acreage is approximately 2.6 Construction Phase - Default construction schedule
Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment
Architectural Coating - MBARD Rule 426 architectural coatings 50 g/L for nonflat coatings and 100 g/L for traffic markings Vehicle Trips - Default trip gen rate
Woodstoves -
Area Coating - MBARD Rule 426 architectural coatings 50 g/L for nonflat coatings and 100 g/L for traffic markings Water And Wastewater - No septic tanks proposed. Changed the percentage and added to aerobic Area Mitigation -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 166.00 Space 0.00 66,400.00 0
Apartments Mid Rise 76.00 Dwelling Unit 2.60 167,960.00 217

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.8 Precipitation Freq (Days) 53

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company User Defined
Operational Year 2030
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
151 CH4 Intensity 0
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Water Mitigation - 2019 Title 24 standards require a 20% reduction for indoor water use

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 150.00 100.00
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 100.00 50.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 76,000.00 167,960.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.49 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.00 2.60
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 0 151
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 97.79
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 97.79
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-2-2023 4-1-2023 0.5380 0.5380
2 4-2-2023 7-1-2023 0.5445 0.5445
3 7-2-2023 9-30-2023 0.5445 0.5445
Highest 0.5445 0.5445

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.7903 9.0300e0030.7838 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2300e0030.0000 1.3151 Energy 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 55.7113 55.7113 6.5000e0046.2000e00455.9133 Mobile 0.1745 0.2155 1.6654 3.5800e0030.4206 2.8100e0030.4234 0.1124 2.6300e0030.1150 0.0000 349.0859 349.0859 0.0216 0.0158 354.3431 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.0966 0.0000 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7519 2.5835 4.3354 0.0458 3.8100e0036.6157 Total 0.9682 0.2539 2.4617 3.8100e0030.4206 9.5300e0030.4302 0.1124 9.3500e0030.1217 8.8485 408.6651 417.5136 0.4887 0.0203 435.7687 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.7903 9.0300e0030.7838 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2300e0030.0000 1.3151 Energy 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 55.7113 55.7113 6.5000e0046.2000e00455.9133 Mobile 0.1745 0.2155 1.6654 3.5800e0030.4206 2.8100e0030.4234 0.1124 2.6300e0030.1150 0.0000 349.0859 349.0859 0.0216 0.0158 354.3431 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.0966 0.0000 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4015 2.2165 3.6180 0.0366 3.0500e0035.4422 Total 0.9682 0.2539 2.4617 3.8100e0030.4206 9.5300e0030.4302 0.1124 9.3500e0030.1217 8.4981 408.2981 416.7962 0.4795 0.0195 434.5953 Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.96 0.09 0.17 1.87 3.75 0.27 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4 Paving Paving 11/17/2023 11/30/2023 5 10
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/1/2023 12/14/2023 5 10 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Residential Indoor: 340,119; Residential Outdoor: 113,373; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 3,984 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 83.00 19.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 17.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0803 0.0803 0.0000 0.0000 0.0811 Total 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0803 0.0803 0.0000 0.0000 0.0811 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.3900e0030.0000 2.3900e0032.6000e0040.0000 2.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9500e0030.0214 0.0147 4.0000e0058.1000e0048.1000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 3.2317 3.2317 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2578 Total 1.9500e0030.0214 0.0147 4.0000e0052.3900e0038.1000e0043.2000e0032.6000e0047.5000e0041.0100e0030.0000 3.2317 3.2317 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2578 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0213 0.0000 0.0213 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.0000e0030.0434 0.0261 6.0000e0051.8100e0031.8100e0031.6700e0031.6700e0030.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4751 Total 4.0000e0030.0434 0.0261 6.0000e0050.0213 1.8100e0030.0231 0.0103 1.6700e0030.0119 0.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4751 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e0048.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.2007 0.2007 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2028 Total 1.0000e0048.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.2007 0.2007 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2028 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0213 0.0000 0.0213 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.0000e0030.0434 0.0261 6.0000e0051.8100e0031.8100e0031.6700e0031.6700e0030.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4751 Total 4.0000e0030.0434 0.0261 6.0000e0050.0213 1.8100e0030.0231 0.0103 1.6700e0030.0119 0.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4751 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1885 1.4986 1.5636 2.7500e0030.0675 0.0675 0.0647 0.0647 0.0000 228.4723 228.4723 0.0432 0.0000 229.5525 Total 0.1885 1.4986 1.5636 2.7500e0030.0675 0.0675 0.0647 0.0647 0.0000 228.4723 228.4723 0.0432 0.0000 229.5525 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.9700e0030.1064 0.0335 4.3000e0040.0138 6.8000e0040.0145 3.9900e0036.5000e0044.6400e0030.0000 41.5639 41.5639 3.6000e0046.1100e00343.3925 Worker 0.0298 0.0229 0.2562 6.6000e0040.0726 4.7000e0040.0731 0.0193 4.4000e0040.0198 0.0000 61.0868 61.0868 2.1500e0031.9100e00361.7112 Total 0.0328 0.1292 0.2897 1.0900e0030.0864 1.1500e0030.0876 0.0233 1.0900e0030.0244 0.0000 102.6507 102.6507 2.5100e0038.0200e003105.1037 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1885 1.4986 1.5636 2.7500e0030.0675 0.0675 0.0647 0.0647 0.0000 228.4720 228.4720 0.0432 0.0000 229.5522 Total 0.1885 1.4986 1.5636 2.7500e0030.0675 0.0675 0.0647 0.0647 0.0000 228.4720 228.4720 0.0432 0.0000 229.5522 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.4000e0041.9000e0042.1000e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.5018 0.5018 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5069 Total 2.4000e0041.9000e0042.1000e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.5018 0.5018 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5069 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8178 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8178 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e0042.1000e0042.3800e0031.0000e0056.8000e0040.0000 6.8000e0041.8000e0040.0000 1.8000e0040.0000 0.5687 0.5687 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5745 Total 2.8000e0042.1000e0042.3800e0031.0000e0056.8000e0040.0000 6.8000e0041.8000e0040.0000 1.8000e0040.0000 0.5687 0.5687 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5745 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.5347 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.6000e0046.5100e0039.0600e0031.0000e0053.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0040.0000 1.2766 1.2766 8.0000e0050.0000 1.2785 Total 0.5357 6.5100e0039.0600e0031.0000e0053.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0040.0000 1.2766 1.2766 8.0000e0050.0000 1.2785 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.1745 0.2155 1.6654 3.5800e0030.4206 2.8100e0030.4234 0.1124 2.6300e0030.1150 0.0000 349.0859 349.0859 0.0216 0.0158 354.3431 Unmitigated 0.1745 0.2155 1.6654 3.5800e0030.4206 2.8100e0030.4234 0.1124 2.6300e0030.1150 0.0000 349.0859 349.0859 0.0216 0.0158 354.3431

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.541220 0.054515 0.190757 0.133854 0.023260 0.005971 0.010451 0.009212 0.001090 0.000543 0.025209 0.001134 0.002785 Parking Lot 0.541220 0.054515 0.190757 0.133854 0.023260 0.005971 0.010451 0.009212 0.001090 0.000543 0.025209 0.001134 0.002785

5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182 21.7182 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182 21.7182 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182 NaturalGas
Mitigated

3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
637008 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
637008 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.4300e0030.0294 0.0125 1.9000e0042.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0032.3700e0030.0000 33.9932 33.9932 6.5000e0046.2000e00434.1952 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
293849 20.1264 0.0000 0.0000 20.1264
Parking Lot 23240 1.5918 0.0000 0.0000 1.5918
Total 21.7182 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
293849 20.1264 0.0000 0.0000 20.1264
Parking Lot 23240 1.5918 0.0000 0.0000 1.5918
Total 21.7182 0.0000 0.0000 21.7182
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.7903 9.0300e0030.7838 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2300e0030.0000 1.3151 Unmitigated 0.7903 9.0300e0030.7838 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2300e0030.0000 1.3151 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.1065 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.6603 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0236 9.0300e0030.7838 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2300e0030.0000 1.3151 Total 0.7903 9.0300e0030.7838 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2300e0030.0000 1.3151 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.1065 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.6603 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0236 9.0300e0030.7838 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2300e0030.0000 1.3151 Total 0.7903 9.0300e0030.7838 4.0000e0054.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0034.3500e0030.0000 1.2844 1.2844 1.2300e0030.0000 1.3151 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 3.6180 0.0366 3.0500e0035.4422
Unmitigated 4.3354 0.0458 3.8100e0036.6157

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

4.95171 /

3.12173

4.3354 0.0458 3.8100e0036.6157
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 4.3354 0.0458 3.8100e0036.6157
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

3.96136 /

3.12173

3.6180 0.0366 3.0500e0035.4422
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.6180 0.0366 3.0500e0035.4422
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814
Unmitigated 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

34.96 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 7.0966 0.4194 0.0000 17.5814
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 28 Date: 4/7/2022 7:47 PM 1 Preston Street GHG - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

ELECTRIFY YOUR RIDE
• All CCCE customers are eligible for the Electrify Your Ride program • $2,000 - $4,000 in rebates available for purchase or lease of new or used electric vehicles (EV), including motorcycles and e-bikes
Additional stackable funds available, including up to $15,000 for income-qualified customers
• $2,400 - $10,000 available for Level 2 electric vehicle chargers at home or workplace
Includes the labor and material costs for installation, including electrical panel upgrades or replacements
Visit 3Cenergy.org/energy-programs to learn more.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER TINY.URL/3CE-NEWSLETTER 3CENERGY.ORG 888.909.6227 [email protected] • Committed to 100% clean and
renewable energy by 2030
• Surpassed interim goal of 60% clean
and renewable energy by 2025
Energizing a Cleaner, More Reliable Grid
• Invested more than $2.1 billion in renewable
generation and storage
• Supporting buildout of new California
renewable generation; more than 90% of
renewable energy sourced by CCCE will
come from new facilities

PLUG INTO
CASH

REBATES
70 Garden Court, Suite 300
Monterey, CA 93940
2020 POWER CONTENT LABEL
Central Coast Community Energy
https://3cenergy.org/understanding-clean-energy/
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity
(lbs CO2e/MWh) Energy Resources 3CE Choice 3CE Prime 2020 CA Power Mix
Eligible Renewable1 31.1% 100.0% 33.1%
Biomass & Biowaste 1.7% 0.0% 2.5%
151 0 466 Geothermal 8.8% 0.0% 4.9%
Eligible Hydroelectric 2.8% 0.0% 1.4%
Solar 15.3% 50.0% 13.2%
Wind 2.5% 50.0% 11.1%
Coal 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
Large Hydroelectric 55.7% 0.0% 12.2%
Natural Gas 0.0% 0.0% 37.1%
Nuclear 0.0% 0.0% 9.3%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%
Unspecified Power2 13.2% 0.0% 5.4%
TOTAL 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Percentage of Retail Sales Covered by Retired Unbundled RECs3: 0% 0% For specific information about this electricity
portfolio, contact:

Central Coast Community Energy
(831) 641-7222
For general information about the Power Content
Label, visit: http://www.energy.ca.gov/pcl/
For additional questions, please contact the
California Energy Commission at:

Toll-free in California: 844-454-2906
Outside California: 916-653-0237
3CE Choice 3CE Prime 2020 CA Utility Average
0 200
400
600
800
1000
3CE Choice
3CE Prime
2020 CA Utility
Average
1 The eligible renewable percentage above does not reflect RPS compliance, which is determined using a different methodology. 2 Unspecified power is electricity that has been purchased through open market transactions and is not traceable to a specific generation source. 3 Renewable energy credits (RECs) are tracking instruments issued for renewable generation. Unbundled RECs represent renewable generation that was not delivered to serve retail sales. Unbundled RECs are not reflected in the power mix or GHG emissions intensities above.

PRESORT STD
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID

CENTRAL COAST

COMMUNITY ENERGY
SOURCE
▼
CCCE
Procures
electricity
supply

DELIVERY
▼
PG&E or SCE
Delivers energy,
maintains lines and
bills customers

CUSTOMER
▼
YOU
Benefit from competitive
rates, clean energy and
energy programs
CLEAN ENERGY. LOCAL CONTROL.

Version: October 2021
You are receiving this notice because you were a Central Coast Community Energy customer in 2020. Receipt of this notice does not mean that your electricity generation services are currently with CCCE. The generation data highlighted in the CCCE 2020 Power Content Label is provided in the Annual Report to the California Energy Commission: Power Source Disclosure Program. Percentages may not round to 100% due to rounding.

Learn about service offerings and energy programs at
3Cenergy.org or call 888.909.6227
Appendix B
Biological Resources Assessment
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
2 5 1 1 G a r d e n R o ad , S u i te C - 250
Monterey, California 93940
831 3 3 3 0 3 1 0
i n f o @ ri n c o n c o n s u l t a n ts .c o m
w w w . r i n c o n c o n s u l t a n t s . c o m
E n v i r o n m e n t a l S c i e n t i s t s P l a n n e r s E n g i n e e r s January 9, 2023
Project No: 21-10851
Lisa Brinton, Planning Manager
Community Development Department
City of Salinas
65 West Alisal Street, 2nd Floor
Salinas, California 93901
Via email: [email protected]
cc: Megan Hunter, [email protected]
Subject: Biological Resources Assessment for 1 Preston Street Project in Salinas, California 95003 Dear Ms. Brinton:

This report documents the findings of a Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) conducted by Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) for the 1 Preston Street Project (project) in Salinas, California. The purpose of this report is to document existing conditions at the project site and to evaluate the potential for impacts to special-status biological resourcesincluding plant and wildlife species, plant communities, jurisdictional waters and wetlands, and suitable habitat for nesting birds, in compliance with the County of Monterey’s California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review requirements.

Project Location and Description
The project site, here after known as the study area, includes County Assessor’s Parcel Number 003-161- 008-000 and is located at 1 Preston Street in central Salinas, California, within Monterey County, on the east of the Monterey Bay (Figure 1; Attachment 1). The study area is south of Highway (HWY) 101. Land uses surrounding the approximately 2.6-acre study area consist of Medium and Low-Density residential neighborhoods to the west and north of the site, as well as commercial uses to the east along north Main Street. The study area is bordered on the north and west by an open space reclamation ditch which is fed by Main Canal, and collects water from Alisal Creek, Gabilan Creek, and Natividad Creek. A small park is located between existing residential developments, roughly 245 feet northwest of the project site on the far side of the reclamation ditch. The site is undeveloped with bare ground and sparse ruderal vegetation in the center and nonnative annual grasslands around the perimeter.

The proposed project consists of a General Plan Amendment and Rezone to modify the existing vacant

2.6-acre lot at 1 Preston Street from Residential Medium Density (R-M-3.6) to Residential High Density (RH-2.1), which would facilitate the development of up to approximately 76 housing units (anticipating a density bonus) across approximately 129,202 square feet (sf). Because there are currently no development proposals, this BRA assumes the maximum potential buildout of the site.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 2 ends

Regulatory Background
Regulatory authority over biological resources is shared by Federal, State, and local authorities under a variety of statutes and guidelines. Primary authority for general biological resources lies within the land use control and planning authority of local jurisdictions (in this instance, the City of Salinas). The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is a trustee agency for biological resources throughout the State under CEQA and has direct jurisdiction under the California Fish and Game Code (CFGC). Under the California and federal Endangered Species Acts (CESA/ESA), the CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) also have direct regulatory authority over species formally listed as threatened or endangered, and species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The U.S. The City of Salinas is the designated lead agency under CEQA for this project.

Methods
This biological resources assessment consists of a review of relevant literature and background information, a reconnaissance-level field survey to confirm existing conditions and determine which biological resources are present or may occur at the site, and an evaluation of the development to determine potentially significant impacts to biological resources under CEQA. The potential presence of special-status species is based on the literature review and a survey designed to map vegetation communities and assess habitat suitability and presence of target species. The study area evaluated for this biological resource assessment is defined as the limits of the subject parcel (Figure 2; Attachment 1).

Literature Review
The literature review included database research on special-status resource occurrences within the Salinas, California 7.5-minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle and eight surrounding quads.

Sources included the CDFW California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) (CDFW 2021a), Biogeographic Information and Observation System (Bios) (CDFW 2021b), USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) (USWFS 2021a), and USFWS Critical Habitat Portal (USWFS 2021b). Other resources included the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (CNPS 2021), CDFW’s Special Animals List (CDFW 2021c), and CDFW’s Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List (CDFW 2021d). Aerial photographs, topographic maps, soil survey maps, geologic maps, and climatic data in the area were also examined.

Field Survey
A reconnaissance-level site visit was conducted to assess the habitat suitability for potential special-status species; map existing vegetation communities and any evident sensitive biological resources currently on site; note the presence of potential jurisdictional waters or wetlands; document any wildlife connectivity/movement features; and record all observations of plant and wildlife species within the study area. Site photos from the survey are included as Attachment 2.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 3 ends

Existing Conditions
Topography and Soils
The site’s elevation is roughly 48 feet above mean sea level. With the exception of the reclamation ditch, the topography of the study area and its immediate surroundings is generally flat and has been previously graded and compacted. The site is located in Salinas, California. Based on the most recent soil survey for Monterey County (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service [USDA,NRCS] 1980), the study area contains two soil map units:
▪ Clear Lake clay, sandy substratum, drained, 0 to 1 percent slopes, is basin alluvium. This soil type is derived from igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock over flood plain alluvium. ▪ Xerorthents, loamy, occurs on old alluvial fans, footslope terraces and footslopes.

Vegetation and Other Land Cover
No natural vegetation communities exist within the study area. Vegetation within the study area is regularly maintained, and was comprised of largely bare ground in the center with sparse ruderal vegetation, with non-native annual grassland along the perimeter (refer to Figure 3, Attachment 1). The dominant species were wild oats (Avena sp.), rip-gut brome (Bromus diandrus), and foxtail barley (Hordeum murinum) within the non-native annual grassland.

General Wildlife
The study area and its surroundings provide habitat for wildlife species that commonly occur in urban habitats such as house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) and California scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica); however, the site is regularly maintained and, therefore, only provides marginal habitat for urban wildlife such as Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), raccoon (Procyon lotor), and fox squirrel (Sciurus niger). The adjacent reclamation ditch channel may provide a dispersal corridor for wildlife. Species such as coyote, bobcat, and raccoon may utilize the channel.

Special-Status Biological Resources
This section discusses special-status biological resources observed in the study area and evaluates the potential for the study area to support special-status biological resources.

Special-Status Species
Local, State, and federal agencies regulate special-status species and may require an assessment of their presence or potential presence to be conducted prior to the approval of proposed development on a property. Assessments for the potential occurrence of special-status species are based upon known ranges, habitat preferences for the species, species occurrence records from the CNDDB species occurrence records from other sites in the vicinity of the study area, and previous reports for the study area. The potential for each special-status species to occur in the study area was evaluated according to the following criteria:

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 4 ends

▪ Not Expected. Habitat on and adjacent to the site is clearly unsuitable for the species’ requirements (foraging, breeding, cover, substrate, elevation, hydrology, plant community, site history, disturbance regime).
▪ Low Potential. Few of the habitat components meeting the species’ requirements are present, and/or the majority of habitat on and adjacent to the site is unsuitable or of very poor quality. The species is not likely to be found on the site.
▪ Moderate Potential. Some of the habitat components meeting the species’requirements are present, and/or only some of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is unsuitable. The species has a moderate probability of being found on the site.
▪ High Potential. All of the habitat components meeting the species’ requirements are present and/or most of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is highly suitable. The species has a high probability of being found on the site.
▪ Present. Species is observed on the site or has been recorded (e.g., CNDDB, other reports) on the site recently (within the last 5 years).

For the purpose of this report, special-status species are those plants and animals listed, proposed for listing, or candidates for listing as Threatened or Endangered by the USFWS under the ESA; those listed or candidates for listing as Rare, Threatened, or Endangered under the CESA or Native Plant Protection Act; those identified as Fully Protected by the CFGC (Sections 3511, 4700, 5050, and 5515); those identified as Species of Special Concern (SSC) by the CDFW; and plants occurring on lists 1 and 2 of the CNPS California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) system per the following definitions:
▪ Rank 1A: Plants presumed extinct in California;
▪ Rank 1B.1: Rare or endangered in California and elsewhere; seriously endangered in California (over 80 percent of occurrences threatened/high degree and immediacy of threat); ▪ Rank 1B.2: Rare or endangered in California and elsewhere; fairly endangered in California (20 to 80 percent occurrences threatened);
▪ Rank 1B.3: Rare or endangered in California and elsewhere, not very endangered in California (less than 20 percent of occurrences threatened, or no current threats known); ▪ Rank 2: Rare, threatened or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere.

Based on a query of the CNDDB, there are 45 special-status plant species and 32 special-status wildlife species documented within the Salinas, California 7.5-minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle and 8 surrounding quads. All 77 special-status species have been evaluated for potential to occur within the study area (Attachment 3).

Special-Status Plant Species
No special-status plants were incidentally observed during the reconnaissance-level field survey. The reconnaissance survey was conducted in May 2021, within the spring blooming period when many species are identifiable. Based on the impacted nature of the site, lack of natural vegetation communities, and habitat requirements of special-status plant species, Rincon determined of the 45 special-status plant species known to occur in the region, Congdon’s tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. Congdonii) is the only species to have a low potential to occur within the study area (see Attachment 3). No other special-status species are expected to occur in the study area. This is due to a lack of species-specific habitat City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 5 ends

requirements on site and the overall lack of suitable habitat such as natural vegetation communities or natural wetland habitats (e.g., marshes or seeps). For the purposes of CEQA analysis, special-status species with low potential to occur will not be addressed further.

Special-Status Wildlife Species
No federal or State-listed or other special-status wildlife species were observed during the field survey.

Of the 32 species evaluated (see Attachment 3), two species had a low potential to occur and three species had a moderate potential to occur. California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) and Monterey shrew (Sorex ornatus salarius) had a low potential to occur. Coast range newt (Taricha torosa), western pond turtle (Emys marmorata), and western burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), had a moderate potential to occur in the study area. For the purposes of CEQA analysis, special-status species with low potential to occur will not be addressed further. No other special-statusspecies are expected to occur in the study area. This is due to a lack of species-specific habitat requirements on site and the overall lack of suitable habitat such as natural vegetation communities or natural wetland habitats (e.g., marshes or seeps). The study area is relatively small and isolated by development from any natural habitats. As such, it does notsupport a prey base for larger predators/raptors and lacks connectivity to regional populations of special-status species.

Coast Range Newt
Coast range newt is a CDFW species of special concern that inhabits terrestrial habitats such as oak woodlands, annual grassland, and chaparral where sufficient moisture is present. As adults they will migrate over 0.62 mile (1 km) to breed in ponds, reservoirs, and slow-moving streams. There is one CNDDB record for the coast range newt within five miles of the study area. The study area is within the known range of the species and suitable terrestrial and aquatic habitat is present within and immediately adjacent to the study area.

Western Pond Turtle
Western pond turtle is a CDFW species of special concern that is found in ponds, lakes, rivers, creeks, marshes, and irrigation ditches, with abundant vegetation. It requires basking sites of logs, rocks, cattail mats, or exposed banks. Western pond turtle is active from approximately February to November. It will estivate during summer droughts by burying itself in soft bottom mud. When creeks and ponds dry up in summer, some turtles will travel along the creek until they find an isolated deep pool, others stay within moist mats of algae in shallow pools, and many turtles move to woodlands above the creek or pond and bury themselves in loose soil. Western pond turtle will overwinter underground until temperatures warm up and the heavy winter flows of the creek subside. They return to the creek in the spring.

There are two occurrences within five miles of the study area, with the closest occurrence approximately

3.6 miles to the east within Natividad Creek. The ditch immediately adjacent to the study area is connected to Natividad creek.

Western Burrowing Owl
Western burrowing owl is a CDFW Species of Special Concern that occupies open, treeless areas within grassland, low density scrub, and desert biomes. This species generally inhabits gently sloping areas, characterized by low, sparse vegetation, and is often associated with high densities of burrowing City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 6 ends

mammals (Poulin et al. 2011). Western burrowing owl often uses relatively disturbed areas such as agricultural fields, golf courses, cemeteries, and vacant urban lots in addition to natural breeding habitats.

Nests are most often in fossorial animal burrows, such as California ground squirrel or American badger, but atypical nests such as culverts or rubble piles may also be used. Nest sites are typically selected in an area with a high density of burrows.

There are five occurrences within five miles of the study area, with the closest occurrence approximately

0.45 miles to the west. Suitable habitat is present throughout the study area within both the nonnative annual grassland and the ruderal habitats. Even though burrows of suitable size were not observed within the study area ground squirrels were observed in the open space alongside the adjacent reclamation ditch within 500 feet of the study area. The species is known to occur in the region and is determined to have a moderate potential to occur within the study area.

Nesting Birds
Birds may nest in trees, shrubs, or directly on the ground. The study area contains suitable nesting habitat for ground-nesting avian species, including killdeer (Charadrius vociferus). Therefore, the study area contains suitable nesting habitat for resident and migratory birds. Adjacent parcels contain trees and shrubs which provide suitable nesting habitat for other avian species. Native bird nests are protected by the MBTA and CFGC Section 3503. The nesting season generally extends from February through August but can vary based upon annual climatic conditions.

Special-Status Vegetation Communities
Plant communities are also considered sensitive biological resources if they have limited distributions, have high wildlife value, include sensitive species, or are particularly susceptible to disturbance. CDFW ranks sensitive communities as “threatened” or “very threatened” and keeps records of their occurrences in CNDDB. CNDDB vegetation alliances are ranked 1 through 5 based on NatureServe’s (2010) methodology, with those alliances ranked globally (G) or statewide (S) as 1 through 3 considered sensitive.

Some alliances with the rank of 4 and 5 have also been included in the 2018 sensitive natural communities list under CDFW’s revised ranking methodology (CDFW 2020e).

Based on the current list, no special-status vegetation communities are present in the study area.

Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands
While no potentially jurisdictional features occur within the study area, the reclamation ditch immediately adjacent to the study area is a potentially jurisdictional feature.

Wildlife Movement
Wildlife movement corridors, or habitat linkages, are generally defined as connections between habitat patches that allow for physical and genetic exchange between otherwise isolated animal populations or those populations that are at risk of becoming isolated. Such linkages may serve a local purpose, such as providing a linkage between foraging and denning areas, or they may be regional in nature. Some habitat linkages may serve as migration corridors, wherein animals periodically move away from an area and then subsequently return. Others may be important as dispersal corridors for young animals. A group of habitat linkages in an area can form a wildlife corridor network.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 7 ends

The study area is not within any Essential Connectivity Areas or Natural Landscape Blocks (CDFW 2021b).

The adjacent ditch may provide a wildlife movement corridor, or habitat linkage; however, it is not within the study area.

Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures
This section discusses the potential impacts and effects to biological resources that may occur from implementation of the proposed project and recommends mitigation measures that would reduce those impacts where applicable.

Special-Status Species
The proposed project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS.

Special-Status Plants
The proposed project has potential to result in direct impacts to special-status plant species if they are present in the disturbance footprint due to removal of individuals or crushing by heavy equipment.

No sensitive plant species were observed during the reconnaissance survey in May 2021 and no specialstatus plants are expected to occur within the study area.

Special-Status Wildlife
The site contains nesting bird habitat. If nesting birds protected by the CFGC or MBTA are present on-site during construction, direct effects could include injury or mortality from construction activity, or nest abandonment from construction noise, dust, and other project activities.

Nesting Birds
The loss of active nests would be a violation of the MBTA and CFGC sections 3503 and 3513. The loss of common avian species is not likely to constitute a significant impact under CEQA; however, the following measures are recommended for all avian species to maintain compliance with federal and State laws:
▪ To avoid disturbance of nesting and special-status birds or migratory species protected by the MBTA and Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 of the CFGC, activities related to the project site development, including, but not limited to, vegetation and/or tree removal should occur outside of the bird breeding season (February 1 through August 30). If ground disturbance, vegetation removal or heavy equipment work must begin within the nesting season, then the project applicant shall submit evidence to the City that a qualified biologist conducted a pre-construction nesting bird survey, within 14 days of the start of construction. The nesting bird pre-construction survey will be conducted by a qualified biologist within the disturbance footprint and a 300-foot buffer. ▪ If nests are found, an avoidance buffer will be established by a qualified biologist. The buffer should be established to ensure nesting activity is not disturbed by construction activity, and should be determined by the qualified biologist based on the species’ known tolerances, the proposed work City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 8 ends

activity, and existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site. The buffer should be demarcated by the biologist with bright construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. All construction personnel should be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. No ground disturbing activities should occur within this buffer until the qualified biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting has completed, and the young have fledged the nest, or the nest has become otherwise inactive. Encroachment into the buffer should occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist.

This measure will reduce impacts to nesting birds to less than significant.

Coast Range Newt
Suitable aquatic breeding habitat for coast range newt is present adjacent to the study area within the unnamed reclamation ditch. There is moderate potential for this species to occur within the study area, and no impacts to breeding habitat are expected from project development. However, direct impacts in the form of injury or mortality could occur if individuals are present during construction activity.

Pre-construction clearance surveys for coast range newt should be conducted within 14 days prior to the start of construction (including staging and mobilization) in areas of suitable habitat. The surveys should cover the entire disturbance footprint. A wildlife exclusion fence should be placed along the top of bank of the adjacent ditch and maintained regularly to deter wildlife from entering the project area during construction. The project applicant shall submit evidence to the City that a qualified biologist conducted pre-construction clearance surveys for coast range newt no more than 14 days prior to the start of construction. These measures will reduce impacts to coast range newt to less than significant.

Western Pond Turtle
Western pond turtle has potential to occur along the adjacent ditch and within the nonnative grassland habitat. The species may be directly adversely affected by the proposed project if individuals are present in the work areas. Injury or mortality of individuals that may result from construction activity may be considered a significant impact under CEQA.

Pre-construction clearance surveys for western pond turtle should be conducted within 14 days prior to the start of construction (including staging and mobilization) in areas of suitable habitat. The surveys should cover the entire disturbance footprint. A wildlife exclusion fence should be placed along the top of bank of the adjacent ditch and maintained regularly to deter wildlife from entering the project area during construction. The project applicant shall submit evidence to the City that a qualified biologist conducted pre-construction clearance surveys for western pond turtle no more than 14 days prior to the start of construction. These measures will reduce impacts to western pond turtle to less than significant.

Western Burrowing Owl
Suitable western burrowing owl habitat is present in annual grassland, and ruderal habitats throughout the study area and within the nearby park and along the adjacent reclamation ditch. Even though there is a lack of burrows and a high degree of disturbance, with the nearby suitable habitat in the adjacent open space and along the reclamation ditch the likelihood of western burrowing owl occupying the study area is increased; therefore, the species is determined to have a moderate potential to occur within the study area. Impacts to western burrowing owls would be limited to project activity that would directly affect an City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 9 ends

occupied burrow (temporarily or permanently damage or destroy the burrow), or project activity that would disrupt active breeding or wintering owls within 500 feet of construction activity. Because of the lack of suitable burrows within the study area, direct impacts to active burrows are unlikely; however, owls can be disturbed by construction noise and human activity and may abandon active burrows, including during breeding. Impacts to active western burrowing owl burrows would be considered significant under CEQA.

The project applicant shall submit evidence to the City that a qualified biologist conducted preconstruction clearance surveys prior to ground disturbance activities within suitable natural habitats and ruderal areas throughout the study area, to confirm the presence/absence of active western burrowing owl burrows. The surveys should be consistent with the recommended survey methodology provided by CDFW (2012). Clearance surveys should be conducted within 30 days prior to construction and ground disturbance activities. If no western burrowing owls are observed, no further actions are required. If western burrowing owls are detected during the pre-construction clearance surveys, the following measures should apply:
▪ Avoidance buffers during the breeding and non-breeding season should be implemented in accordance with the CDFW (2012) and Burrowing Owl Consortium (1993) minimization mitigation measures.
▪ If avoidance of western burrowing owls is not feasible, then additional measures such as passive relocation during the nonbreeding season and construction buffers of 200 feet during the breeding season should be implemented, in consultation with CDFW. In addition, a Western Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan and Mitigation and Monitoring Plan should be developed by a qualified biologist in accordance with the CDFW (2012) and Burrowing Owl Consortium (1993).

These measures will reduce impacts to western burrowing owl to less than significant.

Special-Status Vegetation
The proposed project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would:
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS.

The reclamation ditch to the north and west of the project area is outside the project boundaries. This is a potentially jurisdictional feature. The project will not impact this feature. No CDFW listed sensitive natural communities or riparian habitats are present within the project boundaries. Therefore, no impacts to sensitive natural communities are expected.

Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands
The proposed project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would:
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally or state protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marshes, vernal pools, coastal wetlands, and drainages) or waters of the United States, as defined by § 404 of the federal Clean Water Act or California Fish & Game Code § 1600, et seq. through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 10 ends

No jurisdictional waters or wetlands exist within the project site and no direct impacts are anticipated.

However, potentially jurisdictional features within the vicinity of the project site include the reclamation ditch located immediately adjacent to the project site. Indirect impacts from project activities could occur if sediment or pollutants were allowed to enter nearby waterways. Future project activities could include grading, excavation, and removal of soil... Development of the project site would disturb more than one acre of land, which would mandate implementation of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)-compliant Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would include Best Management Practices (BMP) to prevent and retain stormwater runoff and to prevent soil erosion. Such BMPs could include checking vehicles daily for leaks, maintaining vehicles in good working order, providing spill kits, preparing a spill response plan, and sediment and erosion control measures (e.g., straw wattles, silt fending, check dams). With mandatory implementation of the SWPPP and erosion control measures, impacts to the potentially jurisdictional reclamation ditch would be less than significant.

Pursuant to the City of Salinas Zoning Code Section 37-50,180(h), a 100-foot setback area would be required from the top of the bank of the reclamation ditch in which no building or development could occur. Furthermore, the project would be required to comply with the City of Salinas General Plan Policies COS-17 and COS-18 which require developments to protect wetland and riparian areas through a 100- foot setback and implement a riparian/wetland habitat mitigation and management plan. Development activities may be considered within the setback area if a City Planner determines the encroachment to be minor and a Biotic Resources Study has determined that the proposed encroachment would not result in significant adverse impacts to the applicable creek or wetland because the implementation of alternative mitigation measures would achieve a comparable or better level of mitigation than the strict application of the 100-foot setback. This BRA has determined that a 30-foot reduced setback would be appropriate forthis site, as implementation of the SWPPP and erosion control measures would be equally as protective as a 100-foot setback.

Wildlife Movement
The proposed project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would:
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites.

The adjacent reclamation ditch is a potential wildlife movement corridor however, it is outside the proposed project area and not within the study area. Therefore, no impacts to wildlife movement corridors are expected.

Local Policies and Ordinance
The proposed project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would:
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.

The Salinas General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element includes Policy COS-5.1, which aims to “protect and enhance creek, corridors, river corridors, the reclamation ditch, sloughs, wetlands, hillsides, and other potentially significant biological resources for their value in providing visual amenity, flood City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 11 ends

protection, habitat for wildlife and recreational opportunities” (City of Salinas 2002b). The project would be consistent with Policy COS-5.1 as the project would adhere to applicable regulations and implement mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level, as described under criteria (a) through (d), above.

Chapter 35 of the Salinas Municipal Code sets forth regulations and provisions pertaining to the planting, maintenance, and removal of trees and shrubs in Salinas. According to Section 35-1 of the Salinas Municipal Code, the City defines a heritage and/or landmark tree as 1) an oak tree that is at least 24 inches in diameter at two feet above the ground surface; or 2) an oak tree that is visually significant, historically significant, or exemplary in its species. Section 35-18 of the Salinas Municipal Code prohibits the removal of heritage or landmark trees from City property unless approved by the City’s Public Works Director.

Heritage and landmark trees do not occur within the study area, and development facilitated by the project would not result in the removal of heritage or landmark trees.

Pursuant to Section 35-9 of the Salinas Municipal Code, no person shall root-trim, trim, prune, plant, injure, remove, or interfere with any tree, shrub or plant upon any street, parkway or alley in the City without written permission from the City’s Public Works Director. No trees protected by this policy exist within the study area, therefore the proposed project would not conflict with the Salinas Municipal Code, as applicable.

Habitat Conservation Plan
The proposed project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would:
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

The study area is outside all Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan Areas.

Therefore, the proposed project will not conflict with any adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

Sincerely,
Rincon Consultants, Inc.

Christian Knowlton Sherri Miller
Biologist Principal
Attachments
Attachment 1 Figures
Attachment 2 Representative Site Photographs
Attachment 3 Special-Status Species Evaluation Tables
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project

Page 12 ends

References
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2021a. California Natural Diversity Database, Rarefind 5. (Accessed May 2021)
______. 2021b. Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS). V5.2.14 http://bios.dfg.ca.gov. (Accessed May 2021)
______. 2021c. April. Special Animals List. Periodic publication. April 2021. (Accessed May 2021) ______. 2021d. April. Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List. Quarterly publication. April 2021. (Accessed May 2021)
______. 2021e.Natural Communities List Arranged Alphabetically by Life Form (PDF). Available from https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/VegCAMP/NaturalCommunities#sensitive%20natural%20communities. (Accessed May 2021) ______. 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. March 7, 2012. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=83843. Accessed May 2021.

California Native Plant Society. 2021. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants. V8-02. http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/. (Accessed May 2021)
Poulin, R. G., L. D. Todd, E. A. Haug, B. A. Millsap, and M. S. Martell. 2011. Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia), version 2.0. In The Birds of North America (A. F. Poole, Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA.

The California Burrowing Owl Consortium (CBOC). 1993. Burrowing owl survey protocol and mitigation guidelines. Tech. Rep. Burrowing Owl Consortium, Alviso, California.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021a. Information for Planning and Consultation.

Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ (Accessed May 2021) ______. 2021b. Critical Habitat Portal. Available at: http://criticalhabitat.fws.gov. (Accessed April 2021) United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA, NRCS). 1980.

Web Soil Survey. Soil Survey Area: Santa Cruz County, California. Soil Survey Data: Version 8, September 16, 2019. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm (Accessed April 2021)
Attachment 1
Figures
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
1-1
Figure 1 Regional Location
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
1-2
Figure 2 Study Area
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
1-3
Figure 3 Vegetation/Landcover
Attachment 2
Representative Site Photographs
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
2-1
Photograph 1. The southwest corner of the study area, facing southwest.

Photograph 2. The southwest corner of the study area, facing north. Soil stockpiles in the midground.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
2-2
Photograph 3. Adjacent reclamation ditch with non-native annual grassland along the bank.

Photograph 4. The north side of the study area facing south. Non-native annual grassland along the bank.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
2-3
Photograph 5. Illegal dumpsite and homeless encampment along adjacent reclamation ditch. Northeast corner of the study area.

Photograph 6. Soil and gravel stockpiles along the western edge of the study area.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
2-4
Photograph 7. Heavily disturbed soil in the center of the study area.

Attachment 3
Special-Status Species Evaluation Tables
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-1
Special-Status Species in the Regional Vicinity of the Study Area Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Plants and Lichens
Agrostis lacunavernalis
vernal pool bent
grass
None/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Vernal pools. In mima mound areas or on the margins of vernal pools. 125-150 m. Blooms April - May
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Allium hickmanii
Hickman's onion
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal scrub, coastal prairie, valley and foothill grassland. Sandy loam, damp ground and vernal swales; mostly in grassland though can be associated with chaparral or woodland. 5-200 m. Blooms March - May Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Arctostaphylos
hookeri ssp. hookeri
Hooker's manzanita
None/None
G3T2/S2
1B.2
Chaparral, coastal scrub, closed-cone coniferous forest, cismontane woodland. Sandy soils, sandy shales, sandstone outcrops. 30-550 m. Blooms February - April
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Would have been observed if present.

Arctostaphylos
montereyensis
Toro manzanita
None/None
G2?/S2?
1B.2
Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub. Sandy soil, usually with chaparral associates. 45-765 m. Blooms January - March
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Would have been observed if present.

Arctostaphylos
pajaroensis
Pajaro manzanita
None/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Chaparral. Sandy soils. 30-170 m. Blooms December - February Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Would have been observed if present.

Arctostaphylos
pumila
sandmat manzanita
None/None
G1/S1
1B.2
Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal dunes, coastal scrub. On sandy soil with other chaparral associates. 3-210 m. Blooms February - April
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Would have been observed if present.

Astragalus tener var.
tener
alkali milk-vetch
None/None
G2T1/S1
1B.2
Alkali playa, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Low ground, alkali flats, and flooded lands; in annual grassland or in playas or vernal pools. 0-170 m. Blooms March - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Castilleja ambigua
var. insalutata
pink Johnny-nip
None/None
G4T2/S2
1B.1
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal prairie. Wet or moist coastal strand or scrub habitats. 3-135 m. Blooms May - July
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Centromadia parryi
ssp. Congdonii
Congdon's tarplant
None/None
G3T1T2/S1S2
1B.1
Valley and foothill grassland. Alkaline soils, sometimes described as heavy white clay. 0-245 m. Blooms June - October Low Potential Potentially suitable habitat exists along the creek channel and in the disturbed areas.

With the regular vegetation maintenance, it
is unlikely the species would be observed
within the study area.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-2
Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Chorizanthe
minutiflora
Fort Ord spineflower
None/None
G1/S1
1B.2
Coastal scrub, chaparral (maritime). Sandy, openings. 60-145 m.

Blooms April - July
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Chorizanthe pungens
var. pungens
Monterey
spineflower
FT/None
G2T2/S2
1B.2
Coastal dunes, chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Sandy soils in coastal dunes or more inland within chaparral or other habitats. 3-270 m. Blooms April - July
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Chorizanthe robusta
var. robusta
robust spineflower
FE/None
G2T1/S1
1B.1
Cismontane woodland, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, chaparral.

Sandy terraces and bluffs or in loose sand. 5-245 m. Blooms May - September
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Clarkia jolonensis
Jolon clarkia
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Cismontane woodland, chaparral, coastal scrub, riparian woodland. 10-1280 m. Blooms April - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Collinsia multicolor
San Francisco
collinsia
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Annual herb. Blooms March-May. Closed-cone coniferous
forest, coastal scrub. On decomposed shale (mudstone) mixed with humus. 30-250m. Blooms March - May
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Cordylanthus rigidus
ssp. littoralis
seaside bird's-beak
None/SE
G5T2/S2
1B.1
Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal scrub, coastal dunes. Sandy, often disturbed sites, usually within chaparral or coastal scrub. 30-520 m.

Blooms July - August
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Delphinium
californicum ssp.
interius
Hospital Canyon
larkspur
None/None
G3T3/S3
1B.2
Cismontane woodland, chaparral, coastal scrub. In wet, boggy meadows, openings in chaparral and in canyons. 195-1095 m.

Blooms April - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Delphinium
hutchinsoniae
Hutchinson's larkspur
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Broad leafed upland forest, chaparral, coastal prairie, coastal scrub. On semi-shaded, slightly moist slopes, usually westfacing. 15-535 m. Blooms March - June Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Delphinium
umbraculorum
umbrella larkspur
None/None
G3/S3
1B.3
Cismontane woodland, chaparral. Mesic sites. 215-2075 m.

Blooms April - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-3
Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Ericameria
fasciculata
Eastwood's
goldenbush
None/None
G2/S2
1B.1
Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral (maritime), coastal scrub, coastal dunes. In sandy openings. 30-215 m. Blooms July - October
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Eriogonum nortonii
Pinnacles buckwheat
None/None
G2/S2
1B.3
Chaparral, valley and foothill grassland. Sandy soils; often on recent burns; western Santa Lucias. 90-975 m. Blooms May - August
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Erysimum
ammophilum
sand-loving
wallflower
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Chaparral (maritime), coastal dunes, coastal scrub. Sandy openings. 3-320 m. Blooms March - April
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Erysimum menziesii
Menzies' wallflower
FE/SE
G1/S1
1B.1
Bloom period: January-August. Occurs in coastal dunes,
headlands, and cliffs. Localized on dunes and coastal strands.

Elevations: 1-25 m. Blooms January - August.

Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Fritillaria liliacea
fragrant fritillary
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland, coastal prairie, cismontane woodland. Often on serpentine; various soils reported though usually on clay, in grassland. 3-385 m. Blooms February - April
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Gilia tenuiflora ssp.
arenaria
Monterey gilia
FE/ST
G3G4T2/S2
1B.2
Coastal dunes, coastal scrub, chaparral (maritime), cismontane woodland. Sandy openings in bare, wind-sheltered areas. Often near dune summit or in the hind dunes; two records from Pleistocene inland dunes. 5-245 m. Blooms March - May
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Holocarpha
macradenia
Santa Cruz tarplant
FT/SE
G1/S1
1B.1
Coastal prairie, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Light, sandy soil or sandy clay; often with nonnatives. 10-275 m.

Blooms June -November
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Horkelia cuneata var.
sericea
Kellogg's horkelia
None/None
G4T1?/S1?
1B.1
Closed-cone coniferous forest, coastal scrub, coastal dunes, chaparral. Old dunes, coastal sandhills; openings. Sandy or gravelly soils. 5-430 m. Blooms April - August
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Horkelia marinensis
Point Reyes horkelia
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Coastal dunes, coastal prairie, coastal scrub. Sandy flats and dunes near coast; in grassland or scrub plant communities. 2- 775 m. Blooms May - September
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Lasthenia conjugens
Contra Costa
goldfields
FE/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools, alkaline playas, cismontane woodland. Vernal pools, swales, low depressions, in open grassy areas. 1-450 m. Blooms March - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-4
Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Legenere limosa
legenere
None/None
G2/S2
1B.1
Vernal pools. In beds of vernal pools. 1-1005 m. Blooms May - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Lupinus tidestromii
Tidestrom's lupine
FE/SE
G1/S1
1B.1
Coastal dunes. Partially stabilized dunes, immediately near the ocean. 4-25 m. Blooms April - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Malacothamnus
palmeri var.
involucratus
Carmel Valley bushmallow
None/None
G3T2Q/S2
1B.2
Cismontane woodland, chaparral, coastal scrub. Talus hilltops and slopes, sometimes on serpentine. Fire dependent. 5-520 m.

Blooms May - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Malacothrix saxatilis
var. arachnoidea
Carmel Valley
malacothrix
None/None
G5T2/S2
1B.2
Chaparral, coastal scrub. Rock outcrops or steep rocky roadcuts. 30-1040 m. Blooms May - August
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Meconella oregana
Oregon meconella
None/None
G2G3/S2
1B.1
Coastal prairie, coastal scrub. Open, moist places. 60-640 m.

Blooms March - May
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Microseris paludosa
marsh microseris
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Closed-cone coniferous forest, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. 3-610 m. Blooms April - June Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Monardella sinuata
ssp. Nigrescens
northern curlyleaved monardella
None/None
G3T2/S2
1B.2
Coastal dunes, coastal scrub, chaparral, lower montane
coniferous forest. Sandy soils. 10-245 m. Blooms May - July Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Monolopia gracilens
woodland
woollythreads
None/None
G3/S3
1B.2
Chaparral, valley and foothill grassland, cismontane woodland, broad leafed upland forest, North Coast coniferous forest.

Grassy sites, in openings; sandy to rocky soils. Often seen on serpentine after burns but may have only weak affinity to serpentine. 120-975 m. Blooms March - July
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area
Pinus radiata
Monterey pine
None/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Closed-cone coniferous forest, cismontane woodland. Five primary stands are native to California. Dry bluffs and slopes. 60-125 m.

Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Would have been observed if present.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-5
Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Piperia yadonii
Yadon's rein orchid
FE/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal bluff scrub. On sandstone and sandy soil, but poorly drained and often dry. 10- 505 m. Blooms June - July
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Plagiobothrys
chorisianus var.
chorisianus
Choris'
popcornflower
None/None
G3T1Q/S1
1B.2
Chaparral, coastal scrub, coastal prairie. Mesic sites. 5-705 m.

Blooms March - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Plagiobothrys
diffusus
San Francisco
popcornflower
None/SE
G1Q/S1
1B.1
Valley and foothill grassland, coastal prairie. Historically from grassy slopes with marine influence. 45-360 m. Blooms April - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Rosa pinetorum
pine rose
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Closed-cone coniferous forest, cismontane woodland. 5-1090 m. Blooms May - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Stebbinsoseris
decipiens
Santa Cruz microseris
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Broad leafed upland forest, closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal prairie, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Open areas in loose or disturbed soil, usually derived from sandstone, shale or serpentine, on seaward slopes. 90-750 m. Blooms April - May
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Trifolium
buckwestiorum
Santa Cruz clover
None/None
G2/S2
1B.1
Coastal prairie, broad leafed upland forest, cismontane woodland. Moist grassland. Gravelly margins. 30-805 m. Blooms May - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Trifolium
hydrophilum
saline clover
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Marshes and swamps, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Mesic, alkaline sites. 1-335 m. Blooms April - June Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

Trifolium polyodon
Pacific Grove clover
None/SR
G1/S1
1B.1
Closed-cone coniferous forest, meadows and seeps, coastal prairie, valley and foothill grassland. Along small springs and seeps in grassy openings. 5-260 m. Blooms April - June
Not Expected No natural vegetation communities or
suitable habitat occur in the study area.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-6
Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Regional Vicinity refers to within a 9-quad search radius of site.

Status (Federal/State) CRPR (CNPS California Rare Plant Rank) FE = Federal Endangered 1B = Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and elsewhere FT = Federal Threatened
SE = State Endangered CRPR Threat Code Extension
ST = State Threatened .1 = Seriously endangered in California (>80% of occurrences threatened/high degree and immediacy of threat) SR = State Rare .2 = Moderately threatened in California (20-80% of occurrences threatened/moderate degree and immediacy of threat) .3 = Not very endangered in California (<20% of occurrences threatened/low degree and immediacy of threat) Other Statuses
G1 or S1 Critically Imperiled Globally or Subnationally (state) G2 or S2 Imperiled Globally or Subnationally (state)
G3 or S3 Vulnerable to extirpation or extinction Globally or Subnationally (state) G4/5 or S4/5 Apparently secure, common and abundant
Additional Notations may be provided as follows
T – Intraspecific Taxon (subspecies, varieties, and other designations below the level of species) Q – Questionable taxonomy that may reduce conservation priority ? – Inexact Numeric rank
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-7
Special-Status Animal Species in the Regional Vicinity of the Study Area Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Invertebrates
Euphilotes
enoptes smithi
Smith's blue
butterfly
FE/None
G5T1T2/S1
Most commonly associated with coastal dunes & coastal sage scrub plant communities in Monterey & Santa Cruz counties. Hostplant:

Eriogonum latifolium and Eriogonum parvifolium are utilized as both larval and adult foodplants.

Not Expected No suitable coastal dune or coastal sage
scrub habitat occurs in the study area
and this species host plants were not
observed.

Fish
Eucyclogobius
newberryi
tidewater goby
FE/None
G3/S3
Brackish water habitats along the California coast from Agua Hedionda Lagoon, San Diego County to the mouth of the Smith River. Found in shallow lagoons and lower stream reaches, they need fairly still but not stagnant water and high oxygen levels.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area. The adjacent ditch is fed primarily
by agriculture runoff.

Lavinia exilicauda
harengus
Monterey hitch
None/None
G4T2T4/S2S4
SSC
Occupies a wide variety of habitats, although they are most abundant in lowland areas with large pools or in small reservoirs that mimic such conditions.

Not Expected Potential habitat occurs within the
adjacent reclamation ditch, which
outside the project area.

Oncorhynchus
mykiss irideus
pop. 9
steelhead - southcentral California
coast DPS
FT/None
G5T2Q/S2
Federal listing refers to runs in coastal basins from the Pajaro River south to, but not including the Santa Maria River.

Not Expected Potential habitat occurs within the
adjacent reclamation ditch, which is
outside the project area.

Spirinchus
thaleichthys
longfin smelt
FC/ST
G5/S1
Euryhaline, nektonic & anadromous. Found in open waters of estuaries, mostly in middle or bottom of water column. Prefer salinities of 15-30 ppt, but can be found in completely freshwater to almost pure seawater.

Not Expected Potential habitat occurs within the
adjacent reclamation ditch, which is
outside the project area.

Amphibians
Ambystoma
californiense
California tiger
salamander
FT/ST
G2G3/S2S3
WL
Central California DPS federally listed as threatened. Santa Barbara and Sonoma counties DPS federally listed as endangered. Need underground refuges, especially ground squirrel burrows, and vernal pools or other seasonal water sources for breeding.

Not Expected The site is surrounded by development
and has been heavily disturbed.

Ambystoma
macrodactylum
croceum
Santa Cruz longtoed salamander
FE/SE
G5T1T2/S1S2
FP
Wet meadows near sea level in a few restricted locales in Santa Cruz and Monterey counties. Aquatic larvae prefer shallow (<12 inches) water, using clumps of vegetation or debris for cover. Adults use mammal burrows.

Not Expected Suitable habitat is not present, and the
site is surrounded by development.

City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-8
Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Rana boylii
foothill yellowlegged frog
None/SE
G3/S3
SSC
Partly shaded, shallow streams and riffles with a rocky substrate in a variety of habitats. Needs at least some cobble-sized substrate for egglaying. Needs at least 15 weeks to attain metamorphosis.

Not Expected Suitable habitat is not present, and the
site is surrounded by development.

Rana draytonii
California redlegged frog
FT/None
G2G3/S2S3
SSC
Lowlands and foothills in or near permanent sources of deep water with dense, shrubby or emergent riparian vegetation. Requires 11-20 weeks of permanent water for larval development. Must have access to estivation habitat.

Low Potential Potentially suitable habitat occurs along the adjacent reclamation ditch.

California red-legged frogs may use the
urban creeks as dispersal corridors
however, the urban nature of the
reclamation ditch and a lack of suitable
breeding habitat may preclude them
from the study area. Dispersing
individuals may transiently occur within
the study area
Spea hammondii
western
spadefoot
None/None
G2G3/S3
SSC
Occurs primarily in grassland habitats, but can be found in valleyfoothill hardwood woodlands. Vernal pools are essential for breeding and egg-laying.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Taricha torosa
Coast Range newt
None/None
G4/S4
SSC
Coastal drainages from Mendocino County to San Diego County. Lives in terrestrial habitats & will migrate over 1 km to breed in ponds, reservoirs and slow moving streams.

Moderate Potential Potentially suitable habitat occurs along the adjacent reclamation ditch. Coast
range newts may use the urban creeks
as dispersal corridors however, the
urban nature of the reclamation ditch
may preclude them from the study area.

Reptiles
Anniella pulchra
Northern
California legless
lizard
None/None
G3/S3
SSC
Sandy or loose loamy soils under sparse vegetation. Soil moisture is essential. They prefer soils with a high moisture content.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area.

Emys marmorata
western pond
turtle
None/None
G3G4/S3
SSC
A thoroughly aquatic turtle of ponds, marshes, rivers, streams and irrigation ditches, usually with aquatic vegetation, below 6000 ft elevation. Needs basking sites and suitable (sandy banks or grassy open fields) upland habitat up to 0.5 km from water for egg-laying.

Moderate Potential Potentially suitable habitat occurs
within the adjacent reclamation ditch
corridor.

Phrynosoma
blainvillii
coast horned
lizard
None/None
G3G4/S3S4
SSC
Frequents a wide variety of habitats, most common in lowlands along sandy washes with scattered low bushes. Open areas for sunning, bushes for cover, patches of loose soil for burial, and abundant supply of ants and other insects.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-9
Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Thamnophis
hammondii
two-striped
gartersnake
None/None
G4/S3S4
SSC
Coastal California from vicinity of Salinas to northwest Baja California.

From sea to about 7,000 ft elevation. Highly aquatic, found in or near permanent fresh water. Often along streams with rocky beds and riparian growth.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Birds
Agelaius tricolor
tricolored
blackbird
None/ST
G1G2/S1S2
SSC
Requires open water, protected nesting substrate, and foraging area with insect prey within a few km of the colony.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Aquila chrysaetos
golden eagle
None/None
G5/S3
FP
WL
Rolling foothills, mountain areas, sage-juniper flats, and desert. Cliffwalled canyons provide nesting habitat in most parts of range; also, large trees in open areas.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Asio flammeus
short-eared owl
None/None
G5/S3
SSC
Found in swamp lands, both fresh and salt; lowland meadows; irrigated alfalfa fields. Tule patches/tall grass needed for nesting/daytime seclusion. Nests on dry ground in depression concealed in vegetation.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Athene
cunicularia
burrowing owl
None/None
G4/S3
SSC
Open, dry annual or perennial grasslands, deserts, and scrublands characterized by low-growing vegetation. Subterranean nester, dependent upon burrowing mammals, most notably, the California ground squirrel.

Moderate Potential Suitable habitat occurs within the study area. There are occurrences 0.45 miles
to the west and ground squirrels were
observed in the nearby open space.

Buteo swainsoni
Swainson's hawk
None/ST
G5/S3
Breeds in grasslands with scattered trees, juniper-sage flats, riparian areas, savannahs, and agricultural or ranch lands with groves or lines of trees.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Charadrius
nivosus
western snowy
plover
FT/None
G3T3/S2
SSC
Sandy beaches, salt pond levees, and shores of large alkali lakes. needs sandy, gravelly or friable soils for nesting.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Coturnicops
noveboracensis
yellow rail
None/None
G4/S1S2
SSC
Summer resident in eastern Sierra Nevada in Mono County.

Freshwater marshlands.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Elanus leucurus
white-tailed kite
None/None
G5/S3S4
FP
Rolling foothills and valley margins with scattered oaks & river bottomlands or marshes next to deciduous woodland. Open grasslands, meadows, or marshes for foraging close to isolated, densetopped trees for nesting and perching.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-10
Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Falco peregrinus
anatum
American
peregrine falcon
FD/SD
G4T4/S3S4
FP
Near wetlands, lakes, rivers, or other water; on cliffs, banks, dunes, mounds; also, human-made structures. Nest consists of a scrape or a depression or ledge in an open site.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Rallus obsoletus
obsoletus
California
Ridgway's rail
FE/SE
G3T1/S1
FP
Salt water and brackish marshes traversed by tidal sloughs in the vicinity of San Francisco Bay. Associated with abundant growths of pickleweed however, feeds away from cover on invertebrates from mud-bottomed sloughs.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Riparia riparia
bank swallow
None/ST
G5/S2
Colonial nester; nests primarily in riparian and other lowland habitats west of the desert. Requires vertical banks/cliffs with finetextured/sandy soils near streams, rivers, lakes, ocean to dig nesting hole.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Vireo bellii
pusillus
least Bell's vireo
FE/SE
G5T2/S2
Summer resident of Southern California in low riparian in vicinity of water or in dry river bottoms; below 2000 ft. Nests placed along margins of bushes or on twigs projecting into pathways, usually willow, Baccharis, mesquite.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Mammals
Antrozous
pallidus
pallid bat
None/None
G4/S3
SSC
Found in a variety of habitats including deserts, grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, and forests. Most common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for roosting. Roosts in crevices of rock outcrops, caves, mine tunnels, buildings, bridges, and hollows of live and dead trees which must protect bats from high temperatures. Very sensitive to disturbance of roosting sites.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Corynorhinus
townsendii
Townsend's bigeared bat
None/None
G4/S2
SSC
Occurs throughout California in a wide variety of habitats. Most common in mesic sites, typically coniferous or deciduous forests.

Roosts in the open, hanging from walls & ceilings in caves, lava tubes, bridges, and buildings. This species is extremely sensitive to human disturbance.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Neotoma
macrotis luciana
Monterey duskyfooted woodrat
None/None
G5T3/S3
SSC
Forest habitats of moderate canopy and moderate to dense understory. Also, in chaparral habitats. Nests constructed of grass, leaves, sticks, feathers, etc. Population may be limited by availability of nest materials.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-11
Scientific Name/
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Potential to Occur
in Project Area Habitat Suitability/Observations
Sorex ornatus
salarius
Monterey shrew
None/None
G5T1T2/S1S2
SSC
Riparian, wetland, and upland areas in the vicinity of the Salinas River delta. Prefers moist microhabitats. feeds on insects & other invertebrates found under logs, rocks & litter.

Low Potential Marginal habitat occurs adjacent to the
study area however, the disturbed
nature of the study area precludes the
species from the project site.

Taxidea taxus
American badger
None/None
G5/S3
SSC
Most abundant in drier open stages of most shrub, forest, and herbaceous habitats, with friable soils. Needs sufficient food, friable soils and open, uncultivated ground. Preys on burrowing rodents. Digs burrows.

Not Expected No suitable habitat occurs in the study
area
Regional Vicinity refers to within a 6-quad search radius of site.

Status (Federal/State) Other Statuses
FE = Federal Endangered G1 or S1 Critically Imperiled Globally or Subnationally (state) FT = Federal Threatened G2 or S2 Imperiled Globally or Subnationally (state) SE = State Endangered G3 or S3 Vulnerable to extirpation or extinction Globally or Subnationally (state) ST = State Threatened G4/5 or S4/5 Apparently secure, common and abundant SR = State Rare
SD = State Delisted Additional Notations may be provided as follows SSC = CDFW Species of Special Concern T – Intraspecific Taxon (subspecies, varieties, and other designations below the level of species) FP = CDFW Fully Protected Q – Questionable taxonomy that may reduce conservation priority WL = CDFW Watch List
City of Salinas
1 Preston Street Project
3-12
This page intentionally left blank.

Appendix C
Energy Construction and Operational Energy Fuel Consumption Calculations HP: 0 to 100 0.0588 0.0529
Construction Equipment #
Hours per
Day Horsepower
Load
Factor Construction Phase
Fuel Used
(gallons)
Graders 1 8 187 0.41 Site Preparation Phase 97.26
Scrapers 1 8 367 0.48 Site Preparation Phase 223.48
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 97 0.37 Site Preparation Phase 44.29 Graders 1 8 187 0.41 Grading Phase 194.53
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4 Grading Phase 250.68
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 97 0.37 Grading Phase 88.58 Cranes 1 8 231 0.29 Building Construction Phase 6,232.20 Forklifts 2 7 89 0.2 Building Construction Phase 3,221.69 Generator Sets 1 8 84 0.74 Building Construction Phase 6,428.90 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 97 0.37 Building Construction Phase 3,711.92 Welders 3 8 46 0.45 Building Construction Phase 6,422.69 Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48 Architectural Coating Phase 132.01 Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8 9 0.56 Paving Phase 23.69
Pavers 1 8 130 0.42 Paving Phase 230.89
Paving Equipment 1 8 132 0.36 Paving Phase 200.95
Rollers 1 8 80 0.38 Paving Phase 142.91
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 97 0.37 Paving Phase 168.72 Total Fuel Used 27,815.41
(Gallons)
Site Preparation Phase
Grading Phase
Building Construction Phase
Paving Phase
Architectural Coating Phase
Total Days
MPG [2] Trips
Fuel Used
(gallons)

25.3 8 10.25

25.3 10 25.61

25.3 83 7794.78

25.3 15 64.03

25.3 17 72.57
Total 7,967.24
MPG [2] Trips
Fuel Used
(gallons)

7.6 0 0.00

HAULING TRIPS

20.0 Grading Phase 20.0
10 10

WORKER TRIPS
Constuction Phase
Architectural Coating Phase
Site Preparation Phase
Grading Phase
Trip Length (miles)
249

10.8 10.8

10.8 10.8
220
1 Preston Street Project
Last Updated: 4/7/2022
Compression-Ignition Engine Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC) Factors [1]:

HP: Greater than 100
Values above are expressed in gallons per horsepower-hour/BSFC.

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Construction Phase Days of Operation
3 6
Building Construction Phase
Paving Phase
Trip Class Trip Length (miles)

10.8 HAULING AND VENDOR TRIPS
Building Construction Phase 20.0
Paving Phase 20.0
Site Preparation Phase
1 4/7/2022 8:27 PM

7.6 0 0.00
Total -

7.6 0 0.00

7.6 19 4015.00

7.6 0 0.00

7.6 0 0.00
Total 4,015.00
7,967.24
31,830.41

7.3 VENDOR TRIPS
Grading Phase 7.3
Architectural Coating Phase 20.0
Building Construction Phase 7.3
Site Preparation Phase 7.3
Paving Phase
Sources:
[1] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2021. Exhaust and Crankcase Emission Factors for Nonroad Compression-Ignition Engines in MOVES3.0.2 . September. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-08/420r21021.pdf. [2] United States Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2021. National Transportation Statistics . Available at:
https://www.bts.gov/topics/national-transportation-statistics.

Total Gasoline Consumption (gallons)
Total Diesel Consumption (gallons)

7.3 Architectural Coating Phase
2 4/7/2022 8:27 PM
OR
Annual VMT: 1,132,272
Daily Vehicle
Trips:

Average Trip
Distance:

0.512341 Passenger Vehicles 25.3

0.05237 Light-Med Duty Trucks 18.2

0.194493 Heavy Trucks/Other 7.6

0.150484 Motorcycles 44

0.029151

0.007004

0.010494

0.009415

0.001203

0.000586

0.027411

0.001303

0.003746
Vehicle Type Percent Fuel Type
Annual VMT:

VMT Vehicle Trips: VMT
Fuel
Consumption
(Gallons)
Passenger Vehicles 51.23% Gasoline 580,109 0.00 22,929
Light-Medium Duty Trucks 39.73% Gasoline 449,905 0.00 24,720 Heavy Trucks/Other 6.29% Diesel 71,222 0.00 9,371
Motorcycle 2.74% Gasoline 31,037 0.00 705
48,355
9,371
Fleet Class
Populate one of the following tables (Leave the other blank):

Fuel Economy (MPG) [1]
Motorcycle (MCY)
Annual VMT Daily Vehicle Trips
Fleet Mix
1 Preston Street Project
Last Updated: 4/7/2022
Light Duty Auto (LDA)
Light Duty Truck 1 (LDT1)
Light Duty Truck 2 (LDT2)
Medium Duty Vehicle (MDV)
Light Heavy Duty 1 (LHD1)
Light Heavy Duty 2 (LHD2)
Medium Heavy Duty (MHD)
Heavy Heavy Duty (HHD)
Other Bus (OBUS)
Urban Bus (UBUS)
School Bus (SBUS)
Motorhome (MH)
Sources:
[1] United States Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2021. National Transportation Statistics. Available at: https://www.bts.gov/topics/national-transportation-statistics.

Fleet Mix
Total Gasoline Consumption (gallons)
Total Diesel Consumption (gallons)
3 4/7/2022 8:27 PM
Equipment Horsepower Load Factor
Aerial Lifts 63 0.31
Air Compressors 78 0.48
Bore/Drill Rigs 221 0.5
Cement and Mortar Mixers 9 0.56
Concrete/Industrial Saws 81 0.73
Cranes 231 0.29
Crawler Tractors 212 0.43
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 85 0.78
Excavators 158 0.38
Forklifts 89 0.2
Generator Sets 84 0.74
Graders 187 0.41
Off-Highway Tractors 124 0.44
Off-Highway Trucks 402 0.38
Other Construction Equipment 172 0.42
Other General Industrial Equipment 88 0.34
Other Material Handling Equipment 168 0.4
Pavers 130 0.42
Paving Equipment 132 0.36
Plate Compactors 8 0.43
Pressure Washers 13 0.3
Pumps 84 0.74
Rollers 80 0.38
Rough Terrain Forklifts 100 0.4
Rubber Tired Dozers 247 0.4
Rubber Tired Loaders 203 0.36
Scrapers 367 0.48
Signal Boards 6 0.82
Skid Steer Loaders 65 0.37
Surfacing Equipment 263 0.3
Sweepers/Scrubbers 64 0.46
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37
Trenchers 78 0.5
Welders 46 0.45
Appendix D
Transportation Analysis
1 Preston Residential
Transportation Analysis
Prepared for:

Rincon Consultants
February 28, 2022
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Hexagon Office: 8070 Santa Teresa Boulevard, Suite 230
Gilroy, CA 95020
Hexagon Job Number: 22DC01
Phone: 408.846.7410
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ i

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1

2. Existing Transportation System.................................................................................................... 6

3. CEQA VMT Evaluation............................................................................................................... 11

4. Transportation Operations Analysis............................................................................................ 16

5. Conclusions................................................................................................................................ 28 Appendices
Appendix A City of Salinas VMT Analysis Tool Summary
Appendix B Traffic Counts
Appendix C Intersection Level of Service Calculations
List of Tables
Table ES-1 Intersection Level of Service................................................................................................iii Table 1 Existing Transit Services ..................................................................................................... 9 Table 2 VMT Mitigation Measures and Resulting VMT................................................................... 15 Table 3 Project Trip Generation Estimates..................................................................................... 17 Table 4 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definition Based on Control Delay ...................... 23 Table 5 Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definition Based on Control Delay .................. 23 Table 6 Intersection Level of Service Results................................................................................. 24 List of Figures
Figure 1 Site Location and Study Intersections.................................................................................. 5 Figure 2 Existing Bicycle Facilities..................................................................................................... 8 Figure 3 Existing Transit Services ................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4 VMT Tool Output Summary............................................................................................... 13 Figure 5 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment........................................................................... 18 Figure 6 Existing Lane Configurations ............................................................................................. 20 Figure 7 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................... 21 Figure 8 Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes ................................................................................ 22 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | i
Executive Summary
This report presents the results of a Transportation Analysis (TA) for the proposed residential development located at 1 Preston Street in Salinas, California. The project consists of a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Code Amendment to modify the existing vacant 2.6-acre lot at 1 Preston Street from Residential Medium Density (R-M-3.6) to Residential High Density (R-H-2.1). There is currently no development proposal. With full buildout and anticipating a density bonus, future development on the site may include the construction of up to 83 residential units.

Transportation Analysis Scope
The transportation analysis of the project was evaluated following the standards and methodologies of the City of Salinas. The transportation analysis will consist of a CEQA-level transportation analysis to determine environmental impacts related to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and a transportation operations analysis to determine local impacts to nearby transportation facilities within the project vicinity.

CEQA Transportation Analysis Scope
The CEQA transportation analysis for the project consists of a project-level VMT impact analysis using the City’s VMT tool.

Transportation Operations Analysis Scope
The transportation operations analysis includes the evaluation of weekday AM and PM peak hour operations at a limited number of intersections for the purpose of identifying operational issues (queuing, signal operations, and potential multi-modal issues) at intersections in the general vicinity of the project site. However, the determination of project impacts per CEQA requirements is based solely on the VMT analysis.

CEQA VMT Analysis
CEQA Transportation Analysis Exemption Criteria
The City of Salinas Draft SB 743 Implementation Policy describes screening criteria that determines a non-significant transportation impact for development projects. The criteria are based on the type of project, characteristics, and/or location. The project does not meet the screening criteria described in the Draft SB 743 Implementation Policy and would be required to conduct a CEQA level VMT analysis. 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | ii
Project-Level VMT Impact Analysis
The results of the VMT analysis, using the City’s VMT analysis tool, indicate that the proposed project is projected to generate 10.53 VMT per capita. Therefore, the proposed project would have an impact on the transportation system based on the City’s VMT impact criteria.

Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Project Impact: Since the VMT generated by the project (10.53 VMT per capita) would exceed the threshold of 9.7 VMT per capita, the project would result in a significant transportation impact on VMT.

Therefore, mitigation measures are required to reduce the VMT impact.

Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following project design measures would reduce the VMT generated by the project to VMT per capita of 9.95:

1. Higher Density: The project proposes to construct residential units at a higher density in an infill location. and

2. Pedestrian Network Improvements: The project could construct pedestrian facilities within the project site to connect the project site to existing pedestrian facilities on Preston Street. Creating safe pedestrian connections could encourage future residents to walk instead of drive. and

3. Include Bike Parking Per City Code: The project could provide bike parking on-site. Providing bike parking may encourage future residents to utilize bicycles as a mode of transportation instead of driving.

The implementation of the following TDM strategies would be required to further reduce the project impact to VMT to insignificant levels:

4. Reduce On-Site Parking: Reduce to the number of on-site parking spaces for residents to less than that which is required per the municipal code. or

5. Implement Unbundled Parking: Separate or unbundle parking costs from leases/property costs requiring those that wish to purchase parking spaces to do so at an additional cost. Unbundled parking also would require the implementation of residential permit parking zones in the project area at the expense of the developer. or

6. Affordable Housing: Provide below market-rate housing on-site. or

7. Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program: The project could implement a travel behavior change program by offering incentives to future residents to utilize alternative transportation modes. The program would require 75% participation by residents. and

8. Promotions and Marketing: The project could provide future residents with information about alternative transportation and other TDM programs available to them at move in. The program would require 75% participation by residents. and

Transportation Operations Analysis
The intersection operations analysis is intended to quantify the operations of intersections and to identify potential negative effects due to the addition of project traffic. However, a potential adverse effect on a study intersection operation is not considered a CEQA impact metric. 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | i i i
The transportation operations analysis includes the analysis of AM and PM peak-hour traffic conditions for one signalized intersection and two unsignalized intersections. The intersections were evaluated using Synchro software, utilizing the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010 methodology.

Trip Generation
Based on the trip generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, it is estimated that the project would generate 377 daily vehicle trips, with 31 trips (7 inbound and 24 outbound) occurring during the AM peak hour and 32 trips (20 inbound and 12 outbound) occurring during the PM peak hour.

Intersection Operation Conditions
The operations analysis shows that the signalized intersection of N. Main Street/Rossi Street and the unsignalized intersection of Martella Street/Rossi Street would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours with and without the project. The N. Main Street/Menke Street intersection would operate at an unacceptable LOS F during both peak hours with and without the project. The addition of project generated trips to the intersection would increase the average delay experienced by each vehicle on the worst-leg approach by 13.6 seconds during the AM peak hour. Due to the small number of vehicles traveling along Menke Street relative to the traffic along N. Main Street, improvements are not recommended as drivers have the option to use Martella Street to access Rossi Street and N. Main Street.

Table ES-1
Intersection Level of Service Summary
Unsignailzed Intersection Control and Critical Gaps
Both the unsignalized intersections of N. Main Street/Menke Street and Martella Street/Rossi Street are stop-controlled along the minor street approaches. Since neither of the unsignalized study intersections meet the minimum threshold for minor streets, in can be concluded that the peak hour signal warrant is not met for either intersection. Field observations show that gaps in traffic are available during both peak hours at both intersections.

Study
#
Intersection Control LOS LOS
AM 65.9 F 79.5 F 13.6
PM 183.3 F 183.3 F 0.0
AM 28.9 C 29.1 C 0.2
PM 31.3 C 31.6 C 0.3
AM 22.3 C 24.1 C 1.8
PM 26.2 D 27.9 D 1.7
Notes:
1 Average delay is reported for signalized intersections. Delay for the worst approach leg is reported for TWSC intersections.

Bold indicates a substandard level of service.

Bold indicates an adverse effect with the addition of project trips.

Existing Conditions
No Project with Project
Martella Street & Rossi Street
Avg. Delay1
(sec)
Increase in
Crit. Delay
(sec)
TWSC
Signal
TWSC
Avg. Delay1
(sec)
Peak
Hour
1 N. Main Street & Menke Street
2 N. Main Street & Rossi Street
3 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | iv
Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Analysis
Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian generators in the project vicinity include commercial areas and bus stops along N. Main Street and Rossi Street. Downtown Salinas is located approximately ½-mile walking distance from the project site.

Pedestrian facilities in the project vicinity include sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals at the signalized study intersection. The sidewalk is discontinuous on the south and west side of Preston Street and Martella Street, respectively. Additionally, a sidewalk and curb ramp are missing at the southeast corner of the Martella Street/Menke Street intersection. Although sidewalks are missing along some property frontages along Preston Street, Martella Street, and Menke Street, a continuous sidewalk connects the project site to N. Main Street, which provides access to additional pedestrian facilities and to nearby points of interest.

The project proposes a general plan amendment which would allow construction of buildings that would be either row houses, condominiums, or apartments. Since a site plan has not yet been proposed, the final site plan should be designed to include sidewalks, pathways, and curb ramps connecting buildings to existing pedestrian facilities on Preston Street.

Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle facilities in the project vicinity include bike paths, bike lanes, and bike routes. The project site is not directly served by any bicycle facilities. However, Preston Street and Martella Street carry low volume and is conducive to bicyclists. Existing bike lanes along Rossi Street connect the project vicinity to other bicycle facilities and nearby points of interest.

The Monterey County Active Transportation Plan identifies future improvements to bicycle facilities in the project vicinity. A planned Class I share use path is proposed between Market Street and Rossi Street, opposite from Martella Street. This would provide a safe bicycle connection between the project site to the downtown Salinas area without needing to head west to Davis Road. The project would not remove any bicycle facilities, nor would it conflict with any adopted plans or policies for new bicycle facilities.

Transit Facilities
The project site is adequately served by existing MST transit services. Within the project vicinity, bus routes run along N. Main Street and Rossi Street. The project site is primarily served by five MST bus routes (Routes 23, 29, 44, 49, and 95). The nearest bus stops to the project site are located along both sides of Main Street (at Rossi Street), approximately ¼-mile from the project site. Additionally, the Salinas Amtrak station and the Salinas Transit Center are located approximately 0.6-mile from the project site. The new transit trips generated by the project are not expected to create demand in excess of the transit service that is currently provided. The project would not remove any transit facilities, nor would it conflict with any adopted plans or policies for new transit facilities. 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 1

1. Introduction
This report presents the results of a Transportation Analysis (TA) for the proposed residential development located at 1 Preston Street in Salinas, California. The site is located at the western end of Preston Street. The project site location and surrounding study area are shown on Figure 1.

The project consists of a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Code Amendment to modify the existing vacant 2.6-acre lot at 1 Preston Street from Residential Medium Density (R-M-3.6) to Residential High Density (R-H-2.1). The maximum potential buildout of the site was evaluated as part of this traffic analysis since there currently is no development proposal. With full buildout and anticipating a density bonus, future development on the site may include the construction of up to 83 residential units.

Transportation Policies
Draft SB 743 Implementation Policy
Historically, traffic impact analysis has utilized vehicular delay to identify traffic impacts and potential roadway improvements to relieve traffic congestion that may result due to proposed/planned growth.

However, the State of California has recognized the limitations of measuring and mitigating only vehicle delay at intersections and in 2013 passed Senate Bill (SB) 743, which requires jurisdictions to stop using congestion and delay metrics, such as Level of Service (LOS), as the measurement for CEQA transportation analysis. With the adoption of SB 743 legislation, public agencies are now required to base the determination of transportation impacts on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) rather than level of service (LOS).

In adherence to SB 743, the City of Salinas has adopted a new Transportation Analysis Policy, the City of Salinas Draft SB 743 Implementation Policy. The policy establishes the thresholds for transportation impacts under the CEQA based on VMT instead of LOS. The intent of this change is to shift the focus of transportation analysis under CEQA from vehicle delay and roadway auto capacity to a reduction in vehicle emissions, and the creation of robust multimodal networks that support integrated land uses.

All new development projects are required to analyze transportation impacts using the VMT metric and conform to the Draft SB 743 Implementation Policy.

General Plan Goals & Policies
The Circulation Element of the City of Salinas General Plan includes a set of balanced, long-range, multi-modal transportation goals and policies that provide for a transportation network that is safe, efficient, and sustainable (minimizes environmental, financial, and neighborhood impacts). These transportation goals and policies are intended to improve multi-modal accessibility to all land uses and create a city where people are less reliant on driving to meet their daily needs. The 2002 General Plan 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 2
contains the following policies to encourage the use of non-automobile transportation modes to minimize vehicle trip generation and reduce VMT:
• Use traffic calming methods within residential areas where necessary to create a pedestrianfriendly circulation system (C-1.8); • Encourage car-pooling, at government offices, business, schools, and other facilities, to reduce the number of vehicles using the roadway system (C1.9); • Urge a countywide approach to Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Transportation Systems Management (TSM) as the best way to reduce peak-hour vehicle trips and congestion at major employment centers. (C2.1);
• Work with Caltrain and Amtrak to provide commuter rail service to the Silicon Valley and other major destinations to provide alternatives to automobile use (C-2.5); • Support continued maintenance and expanded use of the City’s Intermodal Transportation Center (C-2.7);
• Support Monterey-Salinas Transit initiatives to provide adequate and improved public transportation service (C-3.1);
• Design development and reuse/revitalization projects to be transit-oriented to promote the use of alternative modes of transit and support higher levels of transit service (C 3.2); • Support the extension of commuter rail to Salinas to allow for alternatives to automobile use. (C

3.3);
• Support public transportation that is “bike” friendly, such as buses with bicycle racks and reduced fares for bicycle riders and provision of bicycle racks at public transportation stations (C-3.4);
• Continue to develop a network of on- and off-street bicycle routes to encourage and facilitate the use of bicycles for commute, recreational, and other trips. Eliminate gaps and provide connections between existing bicycle routes (C-4.1);
• Increase availability of facilities, such as bike racks and well-maintained and well-lit bike lanes, that promote bicycling (C-4.2);
• Encourage existing businesses and require new construction to provide on-premise facilities to aid bicycle commuters, such as on-site safe bicycle parking (C-4.3); • Improve the biking environment by providing safe and attractive cut-through, bike lanes, and bike paths for both recreational and commuting purposes (C-4.4); • Ensure that all pedestrian and bicycle route improvements meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards for accessibility, and Caltrans standards for design (C-4.5); • Encourage parking lot designs that provide for safe and secure bicycle parking (C-4.6); • Increase availability of safe and well-maintained sidewalks in all areas of the City (C-5.1); • Ensure that all pedestrian route improvements meet with ADA standards for accessibility (C5.3) ; • Encourage parking lot designs that promote pedestrian access and safety (C-5.4); • Improve the walking environment by providing safe and attractive sidewalks, cut-throughs, and walkways, for both recreational and commuting purposes (C-5.5) Transportation Analysis Scope
The TA consists of a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) required vehicle-miles-traveled (VMT) analysis and a supplemental traffic operations analysis that demonstrates the project’s consistency with the City of Salinas General Plan goals and policies. The TA was evaluated following the standards and methodologies set forth in the City of Salinas Draft SB 743 Implementation Policy and by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 3
CEQA Transportation Analysis Scope
The CEQA transportation analysis for the project consists of a project-level VMT impact analysis using the City’s VMT tool. The City’s VMT analysis tool was developed to streamline the analysis for development projects with common land uses such as residential, office and industrial uses.

The City of Salinas Draft SB 743 Implementation Policy establishes procedures for determining project impacts on VMT based on project description, characteristics, and/or location. The policy also includes screening criteria that are used to identify types, characteristics, and/or locations of projects that would not exceed the CEQA thresholds of significance. If a project meets the City’s screening criteria, the project is expected to result in less-than-significant VMT impacts and a detailed CEQA VMT analysis is not required. However, the proposed project will not meet all applicable VMT screening criteria.

Therefore, a CEQA-level transportation analysis that evaluates the project’s effects on VMT is required and is presented in Chapter 3.

Transportation Operations Analysis Scope
The current General Plan, City of Salinas General Plan, adopted in September 2002 uses Level of Service (LOS) as its primary metric for the evaluation of the projected operation of the City’s roadway system. Therefore, a traffic operations analysis based upon peak hour intersection level of service analysis is included for consistency with the General Plan goals and policies. The transportation operations analysis supplements the CEQA VMT analysis and identifies transportation and traffic operational issues that may arise due to a development project. However, the determination of project impacts per CEQA requirements is based solely on the VMT analysis.

The transportation operations analysis includes the evaluation of weekday AM and PM peak hour operations at a limited number of intersections for the purpose of identifying operational issues (queuing, signal operations, and potential multi-modal issues) at intersections in the general vicinity of the project site. The transportation operations analysis also includes signal warrant analyses and critical gap evaluation at unsignalized intersections. An evaluation of potential project impacts on bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities is also included.

The study intersections were selected in coordination with City staff and are listed below and are shown on Figure 1.

Study Intersections

1. North Main Street and Menke Street (unsignalized)

2. North Main Street and Rossi Street

3. Rossi Street and Martell Street (unsignalized)
The effects of the proposed development on traffic operations on the surrounding roadway system were evaluated following the standards and methodologies set forth by the City of Salinas General Plan.

Report Organization
The remainder of this report is divided into four chapters. Chapter 2 describes existing transportation system including the existing roadway network, transit service, bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

Chapter 3 describes the CEQA transportation analysis, including the VMT analysis methodology, baseline and potential project VMT impacts, and required mitigation measures to reduce any VMT impacts. Chapter 4 describes the transportation operations analysis including the method by which project traffic is estimated, intersection operations analysis methodology, any adverse intersection 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 4
traffic effects caused by the project, and effects on bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities. Chapter 5 presents the conclusions of the transportation analysis.

Sherwood Dr
W Rossi St
W Lake St
Casentini St
Bridge St
Martella St
N Main St
W Menke St
101
1 2
3 Preston St
X = Study Intersection
= Site Location
LEGEND
1 Preston Street
Figure 1
Site Location
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 6

2. Existing Transportation System
This chapter describes the existing transportation system within the study area of the project. It describes transportation facilities in the vicinity of the project site, including the roadway network, transit services, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

Existing Roadway Network
Regional access to the project site is provided via US-101, SR-68, and SR 183. These facilities are described below.

US-101 is a four-lane freeway in the vicinity of the site. US 101 extends north to Gilroy and the San Francisco Bay Area and south to King City, central California, and the Los Angeles area. Access to the site is provided via its interchange at Main Street.

SR-68 is a four-lane highway with a two-way left-turn median between Blanco Road and Portola Drive. South of Portola Drive, the roadway narrows to two lanes with a two-way left-turn lane. SR 68 extends north to US-101 in Salinas and south to the Monterey Bay Peninsula. SR-68 runs along South Main Street and John Street in the City of Salinas. Access from SR-68 to the project site is provided via Main Street and North Main Street.

SR-183 is a two-lane highway west of the city of Salinas. SR 183 widens to four lanes and runs along Market Street and North Main Street within the City of Salinas. It extends east to US-101 in Salinas and west to SR-1 near Moss Landing. Access from SR-183 to the project site is provided via Rossi Street and Menke Street.

Local access to the site is provided by North Main Street, West Rossi Street, West Menke Street, Martella Street and Preston Street. These roadways are described below.

North Main Street is a four-lane north-south roadway in the vicinity of the project site. North Main Street is the primary north-south roadway within the city of Salinas and connects North Salinas and US-101 to the downtown area. In the project vicinity, North Main Street has a posted speed limit of 40 mph with sidewalks and on-street parking on both sides of the street and no bike lanes. Access to the project site from North Main Street is provided via Rossi Street and Menke Street.

West Rossi Street is a two-lane east-west roadway in the vicinity of the project site and extends between North Davis Road and Sherwood Drive. Sidewalks and bike lanes are present along both sides of West Rossi Street. In the project vicinity, parking is permitted on the north side of West Rossi Street, west of Martella Street. Access to the project site from West Rossi Street is provided via Martella Street.
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 7
West Menke Street is a two-lane east-west roadway that extends between Bridge Street and Martella Street in the vicinity of the project site. A continuous sidewalk is present along the north side of West Menke Street. Parking is permitted on both sides of West Menke Street. Access to the project site from West Menke Street is provided via Martella Street.

Martella Street is a two-lane north-south roadway in the vicinity of the project site extending between West Lake Street and Preston Street. Intermittent sidewalks are present along both sides of Martella Street. Parking is permitted on both sides of Martella Street. Access to the project site from Martella Street is provided via Preston Street.

Preston Street is a two-lane east-west roadway in the vicinity of the project site. A sidewalk is present on the north side of Preston Street. Parking is permitted on both sides of Preston Street. The proposed project site is located at the west end of Preston Street.

Existing Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Facilities
The existing bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities in the study area are described below.

Existing Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities near the project site consist mostly of sidewalks along the streets in the study area. Sidewalks are missing along several property frontages along Preston Street, Martella Street, and Menke Street. However, a continuous sidewalk connects the project site to Main Street, which is the nearest major street in the vicinity. Other pedestrian facilities in the project area include crosswalks and pedestrian push buttons at the signalized study intersection of North Main Street and Rossi Street. At the intersection of North Main Street and Menke Street, marked crosswalks are present along the west and east legs. At the intersection of Martella Street and Rossi Street, marked crosswalks are present along the north and east legs.

Overall, the existing network of sidewalks and crosswalks provides adequate connectivity and provides pedestrians with safe routes to transit services and other points of interest in the area.

Existing Bicycle Facilities
There are several bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the project site. Bicycle facilities are divided into the following three classes of relative significance:

Class I Bikeway (Bike Path). Class I bikeways are bike paths that are physically separated from motor vehicles and offer two-way bicycle travel on a separate path. The Rossi Rico Parkway is in the vicinity of the project site and connects Rossi Street to Davis Road. The nearest access to the bike path is along Rossi Street, approximately 1,500 feet from the project site.

Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane). Class II bikeways are striped bike lanes on roadways that are marked by signage and pavement markings. Within the vicinity of the project site, striped bike lanes are present on Rossi Street, between Davis Road and Sherwood Drive.

Class III Bikeway (Bike Route). Class III bikeways are bike routes and only have signs to help guide bicyclists on recommended routes to certain locations. In the vicinity of the project site, the following roadway segments are designated as bike routes.
• Rice Street, between Rossi Street and Larkin Street
• Casentini Street, between Main Street and Rico Street The existing bicycle facilities are shown in Figure 2.

Sherwood Dr
W Rossi St
W Lake St
Casentini St
Bridge St
Martella St
N Main St
W Menke St
101
Rico St
Preston St
LEGEND
= Existing Class II Bike Lanes
= Existing Class III Bike Routes
= Existing Class I Bike Paths
= Existing Buffered Class II Bike Lanes
= Site Location
1 Preston Street
Figure 2
Existing Bicycle Facilities
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 9
Existing Transit Services
Existing transit services in the study area are provided by Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST) and are shown on Figure 3. The Salinas Amtrak station is located ½-mile from the project site and provides train and connecting bus services from Amtrak. Amtrak services are limited at Salinas station, providing one daily service in each direction via the Coast Starlight. Amtrak provides connecting bus services to train stations towards the north several times daily.

Monterey-Salinas Transit Bus Service
The project site is primarily served by five MST bus routes (Routes 23, 29, 44, 49 and 95). These bus routes are listed in Table 1, including their terminus points and headways. The nearest bus stops to the project site are located along both sides of Main Street (just south of Rossi Street), approximately ¼-mile from the project site. It should be noted that although headways are long, these routes all run along Main Street in the city of Salinas, connecting the downtown area and project site to areas in the northern part of the city, north of US 101.

Table 1
Existing Transit Services
Transit Route Route Description Hours of Operation Headway 1 Route 23 Salinas to King City 6:45 am - 10:00 pm 60 mins Route 29 Watsonville to Salinas via Prunedale 5:45 am - 7:00 pm 120 mins Route 44 Northridge to Salinas 6:30 am - 6:15 pm 75 mins Route 49 Santa Rita via Northridge 6:15 am - 10:00 pm 60 mins Route 95 Williams Ranch to Northridge 9:30 am - 5:15 pm 120 mins Notes:
1 Approximate headways during peak commute periods.

Salinas Transit Center
44 45
29 49
95 23
23 44
28 23
23 20
47 20
25 28 29
44 45 47 49 61
61 41
41 25
as Amtrak/
Greyhound
Salinas Amtrak/
Greyhound
Station
W Rossi St
N Main St
Rico St
Sherwood Dr
W Lake St
Casentini St
Bridge St
Martella
St
Lincoln Av
Monterey St
Central Av
Menke W
St
Martella
St
Lincoln Av
Monterey St
Main St
Salinas St
Gabilan St
Main St
Central Av
Menke W
St
101
W Market St
Preston St
E Market St
Front St
Preston St
= Site Location
LEGEND
20 = Salinas - Monterey via Marina Bus Route
23 = Salinas - King City Bus Route
25 = CSUMB - Salinas Bus Route
28 = Watsonville - Salinas via Castroville Bus Route
29 = Watsonville - Salinas via Prunedale Bus Route
41 = Northridge - Salinas via East Alisal Bus Route
44 = Northridge - Salinas via Westridge Bus Route
45 = Northridge - Salinas via East Market Bus Route
47 = Hartnell - Alisal Campus Bus Route
49 = Salinas - Santa Rita via Northridge Bus Route
61 = Salinas - VA - DOD Clinic
95 = Northridge - Williams Ranch Bus Route
1 Preston Street
Figure 3
Existing Transit Services
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 11

3. CEQA VMT Evaluation
This chapter describes the CEQA transportation analysis, including the VMT analysis methodology and significance criteria, potential project impacts on VMT, and mitigation measures recommended to reduce significant impacts. Pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 743, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 2019 Update Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) states that VMT will be the metric in analyzing transportation impacts for land use projects for CEQA purposes VMT Evaluation Methodology and Criteria
The effects of the proposed project on VMT were evaluated using the methodology outlined in the City of Salinas Draft SB 743 Implementation Policy.

VMT is the total miles of travel by personal motorized vehicles a project is expected to generate in a day.

VMT measures the full distance of personal motorized vehicle trips with one end within the project.

Typically, development projects that are farther from other, complementary land uses (such as a business park far from housing) and in areas without transit or active transportation infrastructure (bike lanes, sidewalks, etc.) generate more driving than development near complementary land uses with more robust transportation options. Therefore, developments located in a central business district with high density and diversity of complementary land uses and frequent transit services are expected to internalize trips and generate shorter and fewer vehicle trips than developments located in a suburban area with low density of residential developments and no transit service in the project vicinity.

VMT Tool
To determine whether a project would result in CEQA transportation impacts related to VMT, the City has developed a VMT Analysis Tool. The VMT tool identifies the existing average VMT per capita and VMT per employee for an identified project area. Based on the project location, type of development, project description, and proposed trip reduction measures, the VMT analysis tool calculates the project VMT. Projects located in areas where the existing VMT is above the established threshold are referred to as being in “high-VMT areas”. Projects that exceed the City’s thresholds of significance are required to include VMT reduction measures that would reduce the project VMT to the greatest extent possible. 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 12
VMT Policies and Impact Criteria
In adherence to SB 743, the City of Salinas has adopted its Draft SB 743 Implementation Policy. The policy aligns with the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, December 2018.

Per OPR’s technical advisory, VMT per resident (capita) is the recommended metric to evaluate CEQArelated transportation impacts for residential land uses. As stated in the technical advisory, OPR recommends an impact threshold of 15% below the existing VMT levels for residential land uses. OPR allows the existing VMT to be measured as regional or citywide VMT per capita. Therefore, the City’s policy has established 15% below the county-wide residential VMT per capita as the impact threshold for residential uses in the city. The VMT Evaluation Tool indicates that the countywide average VMT per capita is currently 11.40. Thus, the project will result in a significant impact if it results in project generated VMT of 9.7 VMT per capita or greater.

If a project is found to have a significant impact on VMT, the impact must be reduced by modifying the project to reduce its VMT to an acceptable level (below the established thresholds of significance applicable to the project) and/or mitigating the impact through mitigation measures, which can include implementing a TDM program.

The VMT analysis tool evaluates a list of selected VMT reduction measures that can be applied to a project to reduce the project VMT. The VMT reduction measures include Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies in the following categories:

1. Parking

2. Transit

3. Communication and Information

4. Commuting

5. Shared Mobility

6. Bicycle Infrastructure

7. Neighborhood Enhancement

8. Miscellaneous

9. Land Use
Project-Level VMT Impact Analysis
The results of the VMT analysis, using the City’s VMT analysis tool, indicate that the proposed project is projected to generate VMT per capita (10.53), which would exceed the impact threshold of 9.7 VMT per capita. Therefore, the proposed project would have an impact on the transportation system based on the City’s VMT impact criteria. The VMT Evaluation Tool output is shown in Figure 4 and also can be found in Appendix A.

Therefore, mitigation measures are required to reduce the VMT impact. Per the city’s impact thresholds, the project would need to implement VMT reduction measures to achieve an 8 percent reduction (10.53 to 9.7) in its VMT per capita for the proposed residential uses to reduce its impact to less than significant levels.
1 Preston Street
Figure 4
VMT Tool Output Summary

VMT CALCULATOR
Version 1.0 Build Date 12_10_20
VMT/Capita 10.53 0.58 9.95
Hex# 155 Daily Trips 452 25 427
This tool is only intended for projects of 2,000 trips or less.

Average (VMT/Capita)
Threshold (15% below Average)
Significant Impact?

11.4 9.7
Accepted: Common Land Use
Residential
Within a 1/2 mile of Major Transit Stop
Affordable Housing
Less than 110 Trips per Day
Local Retail (<50,000 Sq Ft)

PRESUMPTIONS OF LESS THAN

SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
0%
221 | Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise)
Number of Dwelling Units 83
Yes
Mixed-Use Adjustment

PROJECT INFORMATION
1 Preston Street
Suburban Center
Project Name

VMT OUTPUT
1 Preston Street
155 PROJECT REDUCTIONS
PROJ. WITH

MITIGATION
Trip Gen Land Use Type
Hex ID
Address
Project Context/Setting
VMT Land Use Type

LAND USE INFORMATION
0 5
10 15
VMT per Capita
Project Project with Mitigation Threshold
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 14
Mitigation Measures: Based on City’s VMT policy and analysis tool, the following Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies could be implemented to reduce the project’s impact to a less than significant level. The mitigation measures and the resulting VMT are summarized in Table 2.

Implementation of the following project design measures would reduce the VMT generated by the project to VMT per capita of 9.95:

1. Higher Density: The project proposes to construct residential units at a higher density in an infill location. and

The implementation of the following TDM strategies would be required to further reduce the project impact to VMT to insignificant levels:

4. Reduce On-Site Parking: Reduce to the number of on-site parking spaces for residents to less than that which is required per the municipal code. or

6. Affordable Housing: Provide below market-rate housing on-site. or

9. School Carpool Program: The project could implement a school carpool program. Residents would be provided information about the school carpool program at move-in. Interested residents would provide their contact information to similar families that have children at the same school. 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 15
Table 2
VMT Mitigation Measures and Resulting VMT
VMT per VMT VMT
Item Mitigation Mitigation Description Capita Threshold Impact? 1 Project None 10.53 9.7 Yes
2 Higher Density,
Pedestrian Network
Improvements, and
Include Bike Parking Per
City Code
The project proposes to construct residential units at a higher density in an infill location, construct pedestrian facilites within the project site that would connect to the existing pedestrian network, and provide bike parking on-site.

9.95 9.7 Yes
3 Item 2 and Reduce Onsite ParkingReducing on-site parking spaces less than what is required per the municipal code
(9.53)
varies1 9.7 No
4 Item 2 and Implement
Unbundled Parking Unbundle parking costs from leases/property costs. (9.7) varies2 9.7 No
5 Affordable Housing
The project could provide a high percentage of affordable housing units, as defined by the City of Salinas, could result in a less-than significant impact on VMT.
n/a 9.7 No
6 Item 2 and Implement
Voluntary Travel
Behavior Change
Program, Promotions
and Marketing, and
School Capool Program
Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program - Implement a
travel behavior change program by offering incentives to future residents to utilize alternative transportation modes.

Promotions and Marketing - Implement
marketing/educational campaigns that promote the use of transit, carpooling, school pools, and travel through active modes. Strategies may include welcome packets for new
residents, on-line portal to access information, and event promotions.

School Carpool Program - Implement a School Carpool
Program. Residents would be provided information upon
move-in. Interested residents would provide their contact information to similarly interested families.

9.62 9.7 No
Notes:
1 Since a breakdown of units and their sizes has not yet been proposed, the number of required spaces is unknown. Based on a requirement of 2 spaces per unit, reducing the parking supply to one space per unit would result in 9.53 VMT per capita. 2 VMT reduction is varied based on the amount charged for a parking space. Implementing a $20 charge for parking would reduce the VMT per capita to 9.7
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 16

4. Transportation Operations Analysis
This chapter describes the transportation operations analysis including the method by which project traffic is estimated, intersection operations analysis for existing and existing plus project scenarios, any adverse effects on study intersections caused by the project, and effects on bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities, and parking.

The transportation operations analysis provides supplemental analysis for use by the City of Salinas in identifying adverse effects related to the proposed project and to identify potential improvements to the transportation system. The transportation operations analysis supplements the CEQA VMT analysis and identifies transportation and traffic operational issues that may arise due to a development project. The determination of project impacts per CEQA requirements is based solely on the VMT analysis presented in the previous chapter.

Project Description
There currently is no development proposal for the vacant project site. Therefore, the maximum potential buildout of the site was evaluated as part of this traffic analysis. With full buildout and anticipating a density bonus, future development on the site may include the construction of up to 83 residential units. The lot can be accessed at the west end of Preston Street.

Project Trip Estimates
The magnitude of traffic produced by a new development and the locations where that traffic would appear are estimated using a three-step process: (1) trip generation, (2) trip distribution, and (3) trip assignment. In determining project trip generation, the magnitude of traffic entering and exiting the site is estimated for the AM and PM peak hours. As part of the project trip distribution, the directions to and from which the project trips would travel are estimated. In the project trip assignment, the project trips are assigned to specific streets and intersections. These procedures are described below.

Trip Generation
Through empirical research, data have been collected that indicate the amount of traffic that can be expected to be generated by common land uses. Project trip generation was estimated by applying to the size and uses of the development the appropriate trip generation rates. The average trip generation rates for Multi-Family Housing – Mid Rise (Land Use 221) as published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11
th Edition (2021) were applied to the proposed residential development.
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 17
Based on the trip generation rates, it is estimated that the project would generate 377 daily vehicle trips, with 31 trips (7 inbound and 24 outbound) occurring during the AM peak hour and 32 trips (20 inbound and 12 outbound) occurring during the PM peak hour. The project trip generation estimates are presented in Table 3.

Table 3
Project Trip Generation Estimates
Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment
The trip distribution pattern for the project was developed based on existing travel patterns on the surrounding roadway system and the locations of complementary land uses. The peak-hour vehicle trips generated by the project were assigned to the roadway network in accordance with the trip distribution pattern. Figure 5 shows the trip distribution pattern and net trip assignment of project traffic on the local transportation network.

Intersection Operations Methodology
This section presents the methods used to evaluate traffic operations at the study intersections. It includes descriptions of the data requirements, the analysis methodologies, the applicable level of service standards, and the criteria defining adverse effects at the study intersections.

The intersection operations analysis is intended to quantify the operations of intersections and to identify potential negative effects due to the addition of project traffic. However, a potential adverse effect on a study intersection is not considered a CEQA impact metric.

Traffic conditions at the study intersections were analyzed for both the weekday AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic. The AM peak hour typically occurs between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and the PM peak hour typically occurs between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM on a regular weekday. These are the peak commute hours during which most weekday traffic congestion occurs on the roadways in the study area. The study includes the analysis of one signalized intersection and two unsignalized intersections within the City of Salinas. The study intersections were selected in coordination with City staff and are listed below and are shown on Figure 6.

Study Intersections

1. North Main Street and Menke Street (unsignalized)

2. North Main Street and Rossi Street

3. Rossi Street and Martell Street (unsignalized)
Study Scenarios
Intersection operations conditions were evaluated for the following scenarios:
• Existing Conditions. Existing conditions represent existing peak-hour traffic volumes on the existing roadway network. Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at all study intersections were obtained from new traffic counts.

Split Trip Split Trip
Land Use Size Rate Trip Rate In Out In OutTotal Rate In Out In OutTotal Proposed Land Uses
#221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 83 Dwelling Units 4.540 377 0.370 23% 77% 7 24 31 0.390 61% 39% 20 12 32 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition 2021.

Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Sherwood Dr
W Rossi St
W Lake St
Casentini St
Bridge St
Martella St
N Main St
W Menke St
101
1 2
3 Preston St
40%
5%
35%
X 20%
= Trip Distribution
= Study Intersection
= Site Location
LEGEND
XX%
XX(XX) = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Trips
1 Preston Street
Figure 5
Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
1 N MainSt
W Menke
St
2 3
W Rossi
St
N MainSt
MartellaSt
W Rossi
St
5(2)
3(8)
5(2)
2(1)
1(4)
2(1)
0(1)
5(2)
1(1)
2(1)8(4)
8(4)
2(5)
2(7)
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 19
• Existing Plus Project Conditions. Existing plus project conditions represent existing peak-hour traffic volumes on the existing roadway network with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed project assuming the project was completed and occupied today. Existing plus project conditions were evaluated relative to existing conditions to determine potential project impacts on the existing transportation network attributable to the project only.

Data Requirements
The data required for the analysis were obtained from new traffic counts and field observations. The following data were collected from these sources:
• existing traffic volumes
• existing lane configurations
• signal timing and phasing
Lane Configurations
The existing lane configurations at the study intersections were determined by observations in the field and are shown on Figure 7. It is assumed in this analysis that the roadway network and intersection configurations under the existing plus project would be the same as described under existing conditions.

Traffic Volumes
Existing Conditions
Existing peak hour traffic volumes at all signalized study intersections were obtained from new traffic counts collected in January 2022. The existing peak-hour intersection volumes are shown on Figure 8.

Intersection turning-movement counts conducted for this analysis are presented in Appendix B.

Existing plus Project Conditions
Project trips were added to existing traffic volumes to obtain existing plus project traffic volumes (see Figure 9).

Intersection Level of Service Standards and Analysis Methodologies Traffic conditions at the study intersections were evaluated using level of service (LOS). Level of Service is a qualitative description of operating conditions ranging from LOS A, or free-flow conditions with little or no delay, to LOS F, or jammed conditions with excessive delays. The analysis methods are described below.

Study intersections were evaluated based on the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) level of service methodology using Synchro software. This method evaluates intersection operations on the basis of average control delay time for all vehicles at the intersection. The correlation between average control delay and level of service at signalized intersections is shown in Table 4. The correlation between control delay and level of service at unsignalized intersections is shown in Table 5.

City of Salinas Intersection Operations Adverse Effects An adverse effect on signalized intersection operations occurs if for either peak hour:

1. The addition of project traffic causes operations to deteriorate from an acceptable level (LOS D or better) to an unacceptable level, or

2. The addition of project traffic adds one vehicle trip to intersections already operating at an unacceptable level (LOS E or F).

Sherwood Dr
W Rossi St W Lake St
Casentini St
Bridge St
Martella St
N Main St
W Menke St
101
1 2
3Preston St
1 Preston Street
Figure 6
Existing Lane Configurations 1 N Main St
W Menke
St23
W Rossi
St
N MainSt
MartellaSt
W Rossi
St
X
= Signalized Intersection
= Stop Sign Controlled Approach
= Study Intersection
= Site Location
LEGEND
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
Sherwood Dr
W Rossi St W Lake St
Casentini St
Bridge St
Martella St
N Main St
W Menke St
101
1 2
3Preston St
X = Study Intersection
= Site Location
LEGEND
XX(XX) = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
1 Preston Street
Figure 7
Existing Traffic Volumes 1 N Main St
W Menke
St23
W Rossi
St
N MainSt
MartellaSt
W Rossi
St
7(11)
646(1444)
9(22)
8(13)1284(1063)8(27)
0(9)
0(1)
6(13)
8(8)
1(1)
6(8)
70(124)
474(1128)
42(80)
206(159)1026(782)58(110)
121(99)
292(253)
66(180)
123(198)
292(304)
138(116)
1(3)
3(19)
13(13)1(1)12(15)
11(19)
535(525)
9(11)
9(8)
538(581)
7(4)
Sherwood Dr
W Rossi St W Lake St
Casentini St
Bridge St
Martella St
N Main St
W Menke St
101
1 2
3Preston St
X = Study Intersection
= Site Location
LEGEND
XX(XX) = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
1 Preston Street
Figure 8
Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes 1 N Main St
W Menke
St23
W Rossi
St
N MainSt
MartellaSt
W Rossi
St
7(11)
651(1446)
9(22)
11(21)1284(1063)8(27)
0(9)
0(1)
6(13)
13(10)
1(1)
8(9)
71(128)
474(1128)
42(80)
206(159)1028(783)58(110)
121(99)
292(254)
66(180)
128(200)
293(305)
140(117)
1(3)
3(19)
21(17)1(1)20(19)
11(19)
535(525)
11(16)
11(15)
538(581)
7(4)
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 23
Table 4
Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definition Based on Control Delay Table 5
Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definition Based on Control Delay Source: Transportation Research Board, 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (Washington, D.C., 2010) F
This level of delay is considered unacceptable by most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes of such delay levels. greater than 80.0
D
The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable signal progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.

35.1 to 55.0
E
This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor signal progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios. Individual cycle failures occur frequently.

55.1 to 80.0
B
Operations characterized by good signal progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average vehicle delay.

10.1 to 20.0
C
Higher delays may result from fair signal progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, though some vehicles may still pass through the intersection without stopping.

20.1 to 35.0
Level of
Service Description
Average Control
Delay Per
Vehicle (sec.)
A
Signal progression is extremely favorable. Most vehicles arrive during the green phase and do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to the very low vehicle delay.

10.0 or less
A Little or no traffic delay 10.0 or less
B Short traffic delays 10.1 to 15.0
C Average traffic delays 15.1 to 25.0
D Long traffic delays 25.1 to 35.0
E Very long traffic delays 35.1 to 50.0
F Extreme traffic delays greater than 50.0
Source: Transportation Research Board, 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (Washington, D.C., 2010) Level of Service Description Average Delay Per Vehicle (Sec.) 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 24
An adverse effect at a one- or two-way stop-controlled intersection operations occurs if for either peak hour:

1. The addition of project traffic causes overall operations to deteriorate from an acceptable level (LOS D or better) to an unacceptable level, or

2. The addition of project traffic adds one vehicle trip to intersections whose side-street operations are already operating at an unacceptable level (LOS E or F).

An adverse intersection operations effect provides an indication to City staff to determine whether improvements are needed at a study intersection. If adverse effects are found as a result of the addition of project-generated trips on the roadway network, potential improvements that would reduce the project’s effect on the roadway network will be identified.

Intersection Operations Analysis Results
The intersection level of service analysis is summarized in Table 6.

Table 6
Intersection Level of Service Results
Existing Intersection Operation Conditions
The results of the level of service analysis show that the signalized intersection of N. Main Street/Rossi Street and the unsignalized intersection of Martella Street/Rossi Street operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. The unsignalized intersection of N. Main Street/Menke Street currently operates at an unacceptable LOS F during both peak hours. The level of service calculation sheets are included in Appendix C.

Existing plus Project Intersection Operation Conditions The operations analysis shows that the signalized intersection of N. Main Street/Rossi Street and the unsignalized intersection of Martella Street/Rossi Street would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of project-generated trips. The N.

Main Street/Menke Street intersection would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F during both Study
#
Intersection Control LOS LOS
AM 65.9 F 79.5 F 13.6
PM 183.3 F 183.3 F 0.0
AM 28.9 C 29.1 C 0.2
PM 31.3 C 31.6 C 0.3
AM 22.3 C 24.1 C 1.8
PM 26.2 D 27.9 D 1.7
Notes:
1 Average delay is reported for signalized intersections. Delay for the worst approach leg is reported for TWSC intersections.

Bold indicates a substandard level of service.

Bold indicates an adverse effect with the addition of project trips.

The addition of project generated trips to the west leg (eastbound direction) of the N. Main Street/Menke Street intersection would increase the average delay experienced by each vehicle on that approach by

13.6 seconds during the AM peak hour. N. Main Street carries a high volume of traffic during the peak hours and causes side-street traffic to wait for extended periods of time. Field observations show that vehicles were able to make turns from Menke Street once the downstream signal at N. Main Street/Rossi Street approached the end of the green phase for the southbound direction. Due to the small number of vehicles traveling along Menke Street relative to the traffic along N. Main Street, improvements are not recommended as drivers have the option to use Martella Street to access Rossi Street and N. Main Street.

Unsignailzed Intersection Control and Critical Gaps
Both the unsignalized intersections of N. Main Street/Menke Street and Martella Street/Rossi Street are stop-controlled along the minor street approaches. A peak hour signal warrant check and a critical gap analysis were performed at each of the unsignalized study intersections to evaluate the need for a change of control.

Peak Hour Signal Warrant
The need for signalization of the unsignalized intersections was assessed based on the Peak Hour Volume Warrant (Warrant 3) described in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (CA MUTCD), Part 4, Highway Traffic Signals, 2014. This method makes no evaluation of intersection level of service, but simply provides an indication whether vehicular peak hour traffic volumes are, or would be, sufficient to justify installation of a traffic signal. Intersections that meet the peak hour warrant are subject to further analysis before determining that a traffic signal is necessary.

Additional analysis may include operational analysis such as evaluating vehicle queuing and delay.

Other options such as traffic control devices, signage, or geometric changes may be preferable based on existing field conditions.

A peak-hour traffic signal warrant check was conducted for unsignalized study intersections that meet the 100 vehicles per hour threshold for minor streets. Since neither of the unsignalized study intersections meet the minimum threshold for minor streets, in can be concluded that the peak hour signal warrant is not met for either intersection.

Critical Gap Observations
Although the minor street threshold is not met for the peak hour signal warrant at either unsignalized intersection, a critical gap analysis was completed to determine whether vehicles would be able to turn from minor streets onto major streets at study intersections.

The critical gap is the time needed for a driver to safely navigate from a minor street approach. The longest critical gap is typically the left turn from a minor street to a major street at two-way stopcontrolled intersections. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) describes the default values that should be used for these movements based on the number of lanes on the major street. The critical gap is 7.5 seconds and 7.1 seconds for a four-lane major street and two-lane major street, respectively.

Based on the values described in the HCM, vehicles originating at the project site would need a minimum gap of at least 7.5 seconds to turn from Menke Street onto northbound N. Main Street and 7.1 seconds to turn from Martella Street onto eastbound Rossi Street. 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 26
Field observations show that gaps in traffic are available during both peak hours at both intersections.

For the intersection of N. Main Street and Menke Street, field observations show that during both peak hour, vehicles were easily able to make left turns from Menke Street onto N. Main Street when southbound through green phase began at the N. Main Street/Rossi Street intersection. Since the southbound movement at the N. Main Street/Rossi Street intersection ends with a lagging left turn, very few vehicles approach the unsignalized intersection of N. Main Street/Menke Street towards the end of the signal cycle, allowing for vehicles to locate a gap in traffic to depart from Menke Street. Field observations of the signal timing show that the green+yellow+all red for the southbound left turn movement at N. Main Street/Rossi Street totals 12 seconds in the AM peak hour and 16 seconds in the PM peak hour, which would provide an adequate gap in traffic for vehicles to depart Menke Street.

For the intersection of Martella Street and Rossi Street, vehicles are easily able to find gaps in traffic to make the left turn. During busier cycles at the N. Main Street/Rossi Street intersection, vehicles may occasionally spillback to the Martella Street/Rossi Street intersection. However, vehicles are easily able to depart Martella Street once the signal turns green at the downstream intersection. Field observations of the signal timing show that the green+yellow+all red for the eastbound left turn movement at N. Main Street/Rossi Street totals 12 seconds in the AM peak hour and 14 seconds in the PM peak hour, which would provide an adequate gap in traffic for vehicles to depart Menke Street.

Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Analysis
Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities in the study area consist of sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals (see Chapter 2 for details).

Pedestrian generators in the project vicinity include commercial areas and bus stops along N. Main Street and Rossi Street. Downtown Salinas is located approximately ½-mile walking distance from the project site.

The sidewalk is discontinuous on the south and west side of Preston Street and Martella Street, respectively. Additionally, a sidewalk and curb ramp are missing at the southeast corner of the Martella Street/Menke Street intersection. Although sidewalks are missing along some property frontages along Preston Street, Martella Street, and Menke Street, a continuous sidewalk connects the project site to N.

Main Street, which provides connections to nearby points of interest.

The project proposes a general plan amendment which would allow construction of buildings that would be either row houses, condominiums, or apartments. Since a site plan has not yet been proposed, the final site plan should include sidewalks, pathways, and curb ramps connecting buildings to existing pedestrian facilities on Preston Street.

Bicycle Facilities
There are several bike facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project site (see Chapter 2 for details).

The project site is not directly served by any bicycle facilities. Preston Street and Martella Street carry low volume and is conducive to bicyclists. Existing bike lanes along Rossi Street connect the project vicinity to other bicycle facilities and nearby points of interest.

The Monterey County Active Transportation Plan identifies future improvements to bicycle facilities in the project vicinity. A planned Class I share use path is proposed between Market Street and Rossi Street, opposite from Martella Street. This would provide a safe bicycle connection between the project site to the downtown Salinas area without needing to head west to Davis Road. The project would not 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 27
remove any bicycle facilities, nor would it conflict with any adopted plans or policies for new bicycle facilities.

Transit Services
The project site is adequately served by existing MST transit services. Within the project vicinity, bus routes run along N. Main Street and Rossi Street. The project site is primarily served by five MST bus routes (Routes 23, 29, 44, 49, and 95). The nearest bus stops to the project site are located along both sides of Main Street (at Rossi Street), approximately ¼-mile from the project site. Additionally, the Salinas Amtrak station and the Salinas Transit Center are located approximately 0.6-mile from the project site. The new transit trips generated by the project are not expected to create demand in excess of the transit service that is currently provided. The project would not remove any transit facilities, nor would it conflict with any adopted plans or policies for new transit facilities. 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 28

5. Conclusions
The transportation analysis of the project was evaluated following the standards and methodologies set forth by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Salinas.

CEQA VMT Analysis
Project-Level VMT Impact Analysis
The results of the VMT analysis, using the City’s VMT analysis tool, indicate that the proposed project is projected to generate 10.53 VMT per capita. Therefore, the proposed project would have an impact on the transportation system based on the City’s VMT impact criteria.

Therefore, mitigation measures are required to reduce the VMT impact.

Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following project design measures would reduce the VMT generated by the project to VMT per capita of 9.95:

1. Higher Density: The project proposes to construct residential units at a higher density in an infill location. and

The implementation of the following TDM strategies would be required to further reduce the project impact to VMT to insignificant levels:

4. Reduce On-Site Parking: Reduce to the number of on-site parking spaces for residents to less than that which is required per the municipal code. or

5. Implement Unbundled Parking: Separate or unbundle parking costs from leases/property costs requiring those that wish to purchase parking spaces to do so at an additional cost. Unbundled 1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 29
parking also would require the implementation of residential permit parking zones in the project area at the expense of the developer. or

6. Affordable Housing: Provide below market-rate housing on-site. or

The transportation operations analysis includes the analysis of AM and PM peak-hour traffic conditions for one signalized intersection and two unsignalized intersections. The intersections were evaluated using Synchro software, utilizing the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010 methodology.

Unsignailzed Intersection Control and Critical Gaps
Both the unsignalized intersections of N. Main Street/Menke Street and Martella Street/Rossi Street are stop-controlled along the minor street approaches. Since neither of the unsignalized study intersections meet the minimum threshold for minor streets, in can be concluded that the peak hour signal warrant is not met for either intersection. Field observations show that gaps in traffic are available during both peak hours at both intersections.
1 Preston Residential Transportation Analysis Febuary 28, 2022 P a g e | 30
Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Analysis
Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian generators in the project vicinity include commercial areas and bus stops along N. Main Street and Rossi Street. Downtown Salinas is located approximately ½-mile walking distance from the project site.

VMT CALCULATOR
Version 1.0 Build Date 12_10_20
VMT/Capita 10.53 0.58 9.95
Hex# 155 Daily Trips 452 25 427
This tool is only intended for projects of 2,000 trips or less.

Average (VMT/Capita)
Threshold (15% below Average)
Significant Impact?

11.4 9.7
Accepted: Common Land Use
Residential
Within a 1/2 mile of Major Transit Stop
Affordable Housing
Less than 110 Trips per Day
Local Retail (<50,000 Sq Ft)

PRESUMPTIONS OF LESS THAN

SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
0%
221 | Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise)
Number of Dwelling Units 83
Yes
Mixed-Use Adjustment

PROJECT INFORMATION
1 Preston Street
Suburban Center
Project Name

VMT OUTPUT
1 Preston Street
155 PROJECT REDUCTIONS
PROJ. WITH

MITIGATION
Trip Gen Land Use Type
Hex ID
Address
Project Context/Setting
VMT Land Use Type

LAND USE INFORMATION
0 5
10 15
VMT per Capita
Project Project with Mitigation Threshold
Scroll down for all TDM Strategies
# TDM Measure Selected Max
Value Input
0 0
2 Unbundle Parking 5% 0
3 Parking Cash-out 4% 0%
4 Residential Area Parking Permits 0.25% No
5 Price Workplace Parking 4% 0%
6 Parking Management Strategies 1% No
# TDM Measure Input
7 Reduce Transit Headways 2% No
8 Transit Rerouting 2% No
9 Transit Stops near Project Site 2% No
0%
# TDM Measure Input
13 Promotions & Marketing 2% 0%
14 Multimodal Wayfinding Signage 1% No
4%
4%
percent of employees and residents participating
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Safe and Well-Lit Access to Transit 1% No Yes/No

COMMUNICATION & INFORMATION STRATEGIES
Description
12 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGIES

PARKING STRATEGIES
1 Reduce Parking Supply
Description
City code parking provision for project site (parking spaces) Actual parking provision for project site (parking spaces) monthly parking cost ($) for project site
percent of employees eligible
Yes/No
Yes/No
percent of employees eligible
Voluntary Travel Behavior Change
Program 2%

TRANSIT STRATEGIES
Description
Yes/No
10 amount ($) of transit subsidy per passenger (daily equivalent) ($0.75, $1.49, $2.98 or $5.96. Select highest value if unlimited ride passes are provided.)
percent of employees and residents participating
11 Transit Subsidies
percent of employees and residents eligible
0%
$0.00
# TDM Measure Input
0%
17 On-site Carts or Shuttles 1% No
18 On-site Childcare 2% No
# TDM Measure Input
19 Ride-Share Program 5% 0%
22 School Carpool Program 15% None
# TDM Measure Input
23 Bike Charging Facility 1.0% No
27 Bicycle Repair Station / Services 0.50% No
25 Include Bike Parking Per City Code 0.50% Yes Yes/No
level of implementation

BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGIES
Description
Yes/No
24 Implement/Improve On-street Bicycle
Facility 0.50% No Yes/No
Yes/No
No Yes/No
2%
26 Include Secure Bike Parking and
Showers 0.50%
21 Designated Parking Spaces for Car
Share Vehicles 1%
16 Preferential Carpool / Vanpool Parking
Spaces
No Yes/No
Yes/No

SHARED MOBILITY STRATEGIES
Description
percent of employees eligible
20 Car Share 1% None
project setting
- urban + comprehensive transit
- suburban + commuter rail
- all other settings
Yes/No

COMMUTING STRATEGIES
Description
15 Employer Sponsored Vanpool or
Shuttle
None
degree of implementation
- High (>30 vans)
- Medium (10-30 vans)
- Low (<10 vans)
None
employer size
- Large (>500 employees)
- Medium (100-500 employees)
- Low (<100 employees)
percent of employees eligible
2% No Yes/No
# TDM Measure Input
# TDM Measure Input
# TDM Measure Input
38 Street grid 4% No Yes/No
Higher Density 4% Yes Yes/No
37 Open Space 1% No Yes/No
36 29 Pedestrian Network Improvements 2% Within Project Onlyselection: within project and connecting off-site, within project only percent of intersections within project with traffic calming improvements (25%, 50%, 75%, or 100%)
30 Healthy Food Retail in Underserved
Area 2% None selection: within project and connecting off-site, within project only 32 On-site Affordable Housing Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No

MISCELLANEOUS STRATEGIES
Description
31 Virtual Care Strategies for Hospitals 6% No Yes/No

LAND USE STRATEGIES
Description
20% No
33 Transit Oriented Development 15% No
34 Destination Development
(Residential Close to work) 2.5%
1%

NEIGHBORHOOD ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIES
Description
28 Traffic Calming Improvements
0% percent of streets within project with traffic calming improvements (25%, 50%, 75%, or 100%)
0%
No
35 Transit Service Expansion 2.5% No
Appendix B
Traffic Counts
East Menke St West Menke St N Main St N Main St
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 1 N Main St & West Menke St AM
Date: Wednesday, January 26, 2022
Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM
1,300 661
6 17
1,290 662
15 15

0.83 N
S
EW

0.80 0.50

0.93 0.71
(2,222) (1,209)
(11)
(32)
(22)
(26)
(2,204) (1,208)
871
6 0
0 6
1 8
0 0 1,284
076469
East Menke St West Menke St N Main St
N Main St 0 1
0 2 N
S
EW
0 1
0 0
0 0 2 0
0 0
00 3
0 0
0 0
00 0
0 0
0 3 N
S
W E
0 0
0 0 21 12
0 0 0
0 Left Thru Right Total
Interval Eastbound
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 7:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 75 1 0 4 201 0 284 1,697 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 114 1 0 0 226 1 345 1,882 0 1 0 0 7:30 AM 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 125 0 0 0 338 0 468 1,983 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 3 181 2 0 1 405 1 600 1,941 1 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 173 1 0 2 280 5 469 1,770 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 167 6 1 4 261 2 446 1 1 0 0 8:30 AM 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 162 3 1 1 249 4 426 1 2 0 0 8:45 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 185 4 0 1 233 1 429 0 2 0 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
Lights 0 8 1 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 624 9 7 1,269 8 1 1,945
Mediums 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 0 0 15 0 0 35
Total 0 8 1 6 0 0 0 6 0 7 646 9 7 1,284 8 1,983 1
W Rossi St W Rossi St N Main St N Main St
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 2 N Main St & W Rossi St AM
Date: Wednesday, January 26, 2022
Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM
1,290 663
479
392
1,285 586
553
568

0.86 N
S
EW

0.79 0.94

0.96 0.84
(2,204) (1,238)
(910)
(663)
(1,059)
(948)
(2,214) (1,112) 206058
66 292
121
138
292
123
0 0 1,026
070474 42 W Rossi St W Rossi St N Main St
N Main St 0 1
3 2 N
S
EW
0 1
1 2
0 0 2 0
0 0
10 2
0 0
0 0
10 0
0 0
0 3 N
S
W E
0 0
0 0 21 11
0 0 0
0 Left Thru Right Total
Interval Eastbound
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 7:00 AM 0 12 30 19 0 22 88 7 0 12 65 7 0 10 144 48 464 2,526 1 0 1 0 7:15 AM 0 22 45 24 0 24 72 12 0 9 81 9 0 12 187 28 525 2,769 1 3 2 2 7:30 AM 0 22 61 36 0 30 72 11 0 10 102 11 0 13 279 48 695 2,908 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 43 82 39 0 33 75 20 0 16 115 10 0 25 317 67 842 2,843 1 0 2 0 8:00 AM 0 23 80 35 0 22 78 20 0 22 138 9 0 12 230 38 707 2,648 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 0 35 69 28 0 36 67 15 0 22 119 12 0 8 200 53 664 1 1 1 0 8:30 AM 0 24 56 32 0 30 47 19 0 19 136 15 0 14 206 32 630 0 3 3 1 8:45 AM 0 44 42 45 0 26 66 18 0 27 135 11 0 20 170 43 647 0 0 1 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
Lights 0 120 283 137 119 284 64 0 0 67 456 41 56 1,016 203 0 2,846 Mediums 0 2 9 1 0 2 8 2 0 3 16 1 2 10 3 0 59
Total 0 123 292 138 121 292 66 70 474 42 58 1,026 206 2,908 0 0 0 W Rossi St W Rossi St Martella St Martella St
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 3 Martella St & W Rossi St AM
Date: Wednesday, January 26, 2022
Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM
26 18
555
556
16 4
554
549

0.92 N
S
EW

0.81 0.93

0.75 0.92
(43) (38)
(1,057)
(943)
(1,032)
(931)
(30) (12) 13012
9 535
8 7
538
9 3
0 1
0103 W Rossi St W Rossi St Martella St
Martella St 4 6
2 0 N
S
EW
5 1
1 1
3 1 0 0
1 0
00 0
0 1
0 0
00 1
0 0
0 0 N
S
W E
0 1
0 1 00 00
0 0 0
0 Left Thru Right Total
Interval Eastbound
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 7:00 AM 0 1 65 0 0 2 137 3 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 213 1,011 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 2 83 0 0 4 131 4 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 229 1,105 0 0 1 0 7:30 AM 0 2 126 2 1 1 119 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 258 1,139 0 0 0 1 7:45 AM 0 4 147 0 2 3 146 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 311 1,110 0 6 1 3 8:00 AM 0 2 143 1 0 2 148 2 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 3 307 1,032 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 0 1 122 4 0 2 122 5 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 2 263 0 0 1 0 8:30 AM 0 1 118 1 0 2 98 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 229 0 1 0 1
8:45 AM 0 0 106 0 0 5 108 5 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 2 233 0 0 1 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lights 0 9 526 7 3 8 521 8 0 1 0 3 12 1 11 0 1,110
Mediums 0 0 11 0 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 28
Total 0 9 538 7 3 8 535 9 0 1 0 3 12 1 13 1,139 0
East Menke St West Menke St N Main St N Main St
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 1 N Main St & West Menke St PM
Date: Wednesday, January 26, 2022
Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 04:15 PM - 04:30 PM
1,103 1,465
23 50
1,080 1,477
17 25

0.94 N
S
EW

0.98 0.78

0.90 0.54
(2,098) (2,834)
(39)
(84)
(52)
(43)
(2,052) (2,842) 13027
13 1
9 8
1 8
0 0 1,063
0111,444 22
East Menke St West Menke St N Main St
N Main St 0 11
0 5 N
S
EW
7 4
0 0
0 0 3 2
0 0
00 1
0 0
0 0
21 0
0 0
0 3 N
S
W E
0 0
0 0 21 01
0 0 0
0 Left Thru Right Total
Interval Eastbound
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 2 357 9 0 14 263 5 664 2,620 1 1 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 4 0 3 405 7 0 6 265 1 696 2,603 2 3 0 0 4:30 PM 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 337 5 0 6 266 4 631 2,566 0 4 0 0 4:45 PM 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 345 1 0 1 269 3 629 2,516 2 3 0 0 5:00 PM 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 7 0 1 380 6 0 2 239 6 647 2,402 1 3 0 0 5:15 PM 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 369 3 0 7 262 2 659 2 2 0 0 5:30 PM 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 3 323 3 0 4 236 3 581 1 2 0 0 5:45 PM 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 267 6 0 2 223 9 515 6 3 0 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 4
Lights 0 8 1 7 0 9 1 13 0 10 1,433 22 26 1,045 13 0 2,588 Mediums 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 16 0 0 28
Total 0 8 1 8 0 9 1 13 11 1,444 22 27 1,063 13 2,620 0 0 W Rossi St W Rossi St N Main St N Main St
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 2 N Main St & W Rossi St PM
Date: Wednesday, January 26, 2022
Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
1,051 1,506
532
494
997 1,332
618
536

0.95 N
S
EW

1.00 0.88

0.88 0.86
(2,051) (2,885)
(1,015)
(994)
(1,046)
(1,205)
(1,956) (2,610) 1590 110
180
253
99 116
304
198
0 0 782
0124 1,128 80 W Rossi St W Rossi St N Main St
N Main St 2 10
5 6 N
S
EW
7 3
3 2
0 2 4 2
1 0
00 0
0 0
0 0
20 3
0 0
0 0 N
S
W E
0 1
3 0 00 00
0 0 0
0 Left Thru Right Total
Interval Eastbound
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 0 46 70 37 0 19 58 61 0 39 299 24 0 32 202 37 924 3,524 1 1 2 1 4:15 PM 0 58 77 26 0 23 63 70 0 26 277 11 0 26 192 51 900 3,533 3 4 3 0 4:30 PM 0 50 71 22 0 22 66 31 0 33 261 15 0 30 202 38 841 3,500 0 2 0 0 4:45 PM 0 35 75 25 0 27 70 36 0 29 269 23 0 24 192 54 859 3,461 2 2 2 0 5:00 PM 0 55 81 43 0 27 54 43 0 36 321 31 0 30 196 16 933 3,357 1 2 0 2 5:15 PM 0 44 72 25 0 32 54 42 0 33 271 28 0 40 174 52 867 3 3 6 1 5:30 PM 0 43 76 23 0 21 56 29 0 34 261 22 0 19 200 18 802 1 2 2 1 5:45 PM 0 50 75 26 0 17 71 23 0 30 210 27 0 15 183 28 755 4 2 10 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 4
Lights 0 197 302 115 0 98 251 178 0 121 1,117 80 107 776 153 0 3,495 Mediums 0 1 2 1 0 0 2 2 0 2 10 0 2 6 6 0 34
Total 0 198 304 116 0 99 253 180 124 1,128 80 110 782 159 3,533 0 0 W Rossi St W Rossi St Martella St Martella St
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 3 Martella St & W Rossi St PM
Date: Wednesday, January 26, 2022
Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
29 20
555
616
22 22
593
541

0.91 N
S
EW

0.81 0.94

0.61 0.83
(47) (45)
(1,066)
(1,213)
(1,028)
(1,169)
(43) (47) 13114
11 525
17 4
581
8 2
0 1
03019 W Rossi St W Rossi St Martella St
Martella St 6 0
3 0 N
S
EW
0 0
2 1
1 5 0 0
1 0
00 0
0 2
0 0
00 0
0 0
0 0 N
S
W E
0 1
0 0 00 00
0 0 0
0 Left Thru Right Total
Interval Eastbound
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 0 1 158 0 0 9 129 7 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 3 316 1,186 0 0 1 0 4:15 PM 0 3 153 1 2 2 125 2 0 2 0 7 0 1 0 2 300 1,199 0 0 2 0 4:30 PM 0 2 137 1 0 9 138 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 1 3 303 1,154 0 0 1 0 4:45 PM 0 2 114 0 0 2 137 2 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 3 267 1,126 0 0 0 1 5:00 PM 0 1 177 2 0 4 125 3 0 0 0 8 0 4 0 5 329 1,143 0 0 0 5 5:15 PM 0 0 123 0 0 3 119 3 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 0 255 0 0 0 1 5:30 PM 0 2 135 0 0 6 115 1 0 0 0 11 0 2 0 3 275 0 0 1 0 5:45 PM 0 9 148 0 0 2 115 2 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 2 284 0 1 1 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lights 0 8 578 3 2 15 516 11 0 3 0 19 14 1 11 1 1,182
Mediums 0 0 3 1 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 16
Total 0 8 581 4 2 17 525 11 0 3 0 19 14 1 13 1,199 1
Appendix C
Level of Service Calculations
HCM 2010 TWSC
1: N. Main Street & Menke Street 02/16/2022
1 Preston TA 7:00 am 01/30/2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 1 6 0 0 6 7 646 9 8 1284 8
Future Vol, veh/h 8 1 6 0 0 6 7 646 9 8 1284 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 75 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 9 1 7 0 0 7 8 702 10 9 1396 9
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1786 2147 703 1440 2146 356 1405 0 0 712 0 0 Stage 1 1419 1419 - 723 723 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 367 728 - 717 1423 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 51 48 380 93 48 640 482 - - 884 - -
Stage 1 144 201 - 384 429 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 625 427 - 387 200 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 49 47 380 88 47 640 482 - - 884 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 49 47 - 88 47 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 142 199 - 377 422 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 608 420 - 374 198 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 65.9 10.7 0.1 0.1

HCM LOS F B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 482 - - 75 640 884 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.217 0.01 0.01 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.6 - - 65.9 10.7 9.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.8 0 0 - -
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Rossi Street & N. Main Street 02/16/2022
1 Preston TA 7:00 am 01/30/2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 123 292 138 121 292 66 70 474 42 58 1026 206 Future Volume (veh/h) 123 292 138 121 292 66 70 474 42 58 1026 206 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 134 317 150 132 317 0 76 515 46 63 1115 0 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 211 379 322 165 438 372 98 753 337 456 1466 656 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.09 0.23 0.00 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.26 0.41 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 134 317 150 132 317 0 76 515 46 63 1115 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.9 12.6 6.4 5.6 12.1 0.0 3.3 10.3 1.3 2.1 20.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.9 12.6 6.4 5.6 12.1 0.0 3.3 10.3 1.3 2.1 20.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 379 322 165 438 372 98 753 337 456 1466 656 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.84 0.47 0.80 0.72 0.00 0.77 0.68 0.14 0.14 0.76 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 335 472 401 173 472 401 265 2368 1059 456 2184 977 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.3 29.4 27.0 34.2 27.2 0.0 35.9 27.9 13.2 22.0 19.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.1 10.4 1.0 22.1 5.0 0.0 12.0 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 7.5 2.9 3.8 6.8 0.0 1.9 5.1 0.8 1.0 10.2 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.4 39.8 28.0 56.3 32.2 0.0 47.8 29.0 13.4 22.2 20.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D C E C D C B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 601 449 637 1178
Approach Delay, s/veh 36.6 39.3 30.1 20.3
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.3 20.9 11.7 20.2 8.8 36.4 9.2 22.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.5 51.5 7.5 19.5 11.5 47.5 7.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.1 12.3 7.6 14.6 5.3 22.7 4.9 14.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.1 0.0 1.1 0.1 9.2 0.1 0.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 28.9
HCM 2010 LOS C
HCM 2010 TWSC
3: Rossi Street & Martella Street 02/16/2022
1 Preston TA 7:00 am 01/30/2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 538 7 11 535 9 1 0 3 12 1 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 538 7 11 535 9 1 0 3 12 1 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 190 - - 80 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 10 585 8 12 582 10 1 0 3 13 1 14
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 592 0 0 593 0 0 1228 1225 589 1222 1224 587 Stage 1 - - - - - - 609 609 - 611 611 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 619 616 - 611 613 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 984 - - 983 - - 155 179 508 156 179 510 Stage 1 - - - - - - 482 485 - 481 484 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 476 482 - 481 483 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 984 - - 983 - - 147 175 508 152 175 510 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 147 175 - 152 175 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 477 480 - 476 478 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 456 476 - 473 478 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.2 16.6 22.3

HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 315 984 - - 983 - - 236
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.01 - - 0.012 - - 0.12
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.6 8.7 - - 8.7 - - 22.3
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.4
HCM 2010 TWSC
1: N. Main Street & Menke Street 02/16/2022
1 Preston TA 4:00 pm 01/30/2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 1 8 9 1 13 11 1444 22 27 1063 13
Future Vol, veh/h 8 1 8 9 1 13 11 1444 22 27 1063 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 75 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 9 1 9 10 1 14 12 1570 24 29 1155 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2030 2838 585 2242 2833 797 1169 0 0 1594 0 0 Stage 1 1220 1220 - 1606 1606 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 810 1618 - 636 1227 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 34 17 454 23 17 329 593 - - 407 - -
Stage 1 191 251 - 110 163 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 340 161 - 433 249 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 29 15 454 20 15 329 593 - - 407 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 29 15 - 20 15 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 187 233 - 108 160 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 317 158 - 393 231 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 124.5 183.3 0.1 0.4

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 593 - - 47 41 407 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - - 0.393 0.61 0.072 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.2 - - 124.5 183.3 14.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1.4 2.2 0.2 - -
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Rossi Street & N. Main Street 02/16/2022
1 Preston TA 4:00 pm 01/30/2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 198 304 116 99 253 180 124 1128 80 110 782 159 Future Volume (veh/h) 198 304 116 99 253 180 124 1128 80 110 782 159 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 215 330 126 108 275 0 135 1226 87 120 850 0 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 289 378 321 136 365 310 168 1553 695 151 1519 680 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.20 0.00 0.09 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.43 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 215 330 126 108 275 0 135 1226 87 120 850 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 15.7 6.3 5.5 12.8 0.0 6.8 27.3 3.0 6.1 16.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.6 15.7 6.3 5.5 12.8 0.0 6.8 27.3 3.0 6.1 16.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 289 378 321 136 365 310 168 1553 695 151 1519 680 V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.87 0.39 0.79 0.75 0.00 0.80 0.79 0.13 0.80 0.56 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 357 437 371 184 437 371 261 2143 959 223 2066 924 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.0 35.4 31.6 41.6 34.8 0.0 40.7 22.1 15.3 41.2 19.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.5 15.8 0.8 15.2 6.0 0.0 9.6 1.4 0.1 11.5 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.9 9.7 2.8 3.3 7.2 0.0 3.8 13.6 1.3 3.4 8.1 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.5 51.2 32.4 56.8 40.8 0.0 50.3 23.5 15.3 52.7 20.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D C E D D C B D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 671 383 1448 970
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.5 45.3 25.5 24.0
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.3 44.7 11.5 23.1 13.2 43.8 12.2 22.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.5 55.5 9.5 21.5 13.5 53.5 9.5 21.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.1 29.3 7.5 17.7 8.8 18.5 7.6 14.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 11.0 0.0 0.9 0.1 7.1 0.1 0.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 31.3
HCM 2010 LOS C
HCM 2010 TWSC
3: Rossi Street & Martella Street 02/16/2022
1 Preston TA 4:00 pm 01/30/2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 581 4 19 525 11 3 0 19 15 1 13
Future Vol, veh/h 8 581 4 19 525 11 3 0 19 15 1 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 190 - - 80 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 9 632 4 21 571 12 3 0 21 16 1 14
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 583 0 0 636 0 0 1279 1277 634 1282 1273 577 Stage 1 - - - - - - 652 652 - 619 619 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 627 625 - 663 654 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 991 - - 947 - - 143 166 479 142 167 516 Stage 1 - - - - - - 457 464 - 476 480 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 471 477 - 450 463 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 991 - - 947 - - 135 161 479 133 162 516 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 135 161 - 133 162 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 453 460 - 472 469 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 447 467 - 427 459 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.3 15.9 26.2

HCM LOS C D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 355 991 - - 947 - - 201
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 0.009 - - 0.022 - - 0.157
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.9 8.7 - - 8.9 - - 26.2
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.5
HCM 2010 TWSC
1: N. Main Street & Menke Street 02/17/2022
1 Preston TA 7:00 am 01/30/2022 Existing+P AM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 1 8 0 0 6 7 651 9 8 1284 11
Future Vol, veh/h 13 1 8 0 0 6 7 651 9 8 1284 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 75 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 14 1 9 0 0 7 8 708 10 9 1396 12
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1790 2154 704 1446 2155 359 1408 0 0 718 0 0 Stage 1 1420 1420 - 729 729 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 370 734 - 717 1426 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 51 47 379 92 47 638 481 - - 879 - -
Stage 1 143 201 - 380 426 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 622 424 - 387 199 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 49 46 379 86 46 638 481 - - 879 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 49 46 - 86 46 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 141 199 - 374 419 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 605 417 - 372 197 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 79.5 10.7 0.1 0.1

HCM LOS F B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 481 - - 71 638 879 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.337 0.01 0.01 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.6 - - 79.5 10.7 9.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 1.3 0 0 - -
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Rossi Street & N. Main Street 02/17/2022
1 Preston TA 7:00 am 01/30/2022 Existing+P AM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 128 293 140 121 292 66 71 474 42 58 1028 206 Future Volume (veh/h) 128 293 140 121 292 66 71 474 42 58 1028 206 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 139 318 152 132 317 0 77 515 46 63 1117 0 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 217 379 322 165 435 370 100 752 336 458 1466 656 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.09 0.23 0.00 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.26 0.41 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 139 318 152 132 317 0 77 515 46 63 1117 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.0 12.7 6.5 5.6 12.2 0.0 3.3 10.4 1.3 2.1 20.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.0 12.7 6.5 5.6 12.2 0.0 3.3 10.4 1.3 2.1 20.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 217 379 322 165 435 370 100 752 336 458 1466 656 V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.84 0.47 0.80 0.73 0.00 0.77 0.68 0.14 0.14 0.76 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 334 470 399 172 470 399 264 2357 1055 458 2174 973 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.4 29.6 27.1 34.4 27.4 0.0 36.0 28.1 13.3 22.1 19.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.1 10.6 1.1 22.2 5.2 0.0 11.8 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 7.7 2.9 3.8 6.9 0.0 2.0 5.2 0.8 1.0 10.3 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.5 40.2 28.2 56.6 32.6 0.0 47.8 29.2 13.5 22.2 20.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D C E C D C B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 609 449 638 1180
Approach Delay, s/veh 36.8 39.7 30.3 20.4
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.5 20.9 11.7 20.2 8.8 36.5 9.4 22.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.5 51.5 7.5 19.5 11.5 47.5 7.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.1 12.4 7.6 14.7 5.3 22.9 5.0 14.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.1 0.0 1.1 0.1 9.2 0.1 0.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 29.1
HCM 2010 LOS C
HCM 2010 TWSC
3: Rossi Street & Martella Street 02/17/2022
1 Preston TA 7:00 am 01/30/2022 Existing+P AM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 538 7 11 535 11 1 0 3 20 1 21
Future Vol, veh/h 11 538 7 11 535 11 1 0 3 20 1 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 190 - - 80 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 12 585 8 12 582 12 1 0 3 22 1 23
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 594 0 0 593 0 0 1237 1231 589 1227 1229 588 Stage 1 - - - - - - 613 613 - 612 612 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 624 618 - 615 617 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 982 - - 983 - - 153 177 508 155 178 509 Stage 1 - - - - - - 480 483 - 480 484 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 473 481 - 479 481 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 982 - - 983 - - 143 173 508 151 174 509 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 143 173 - 151 174 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 474 477 - 474 478 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 445 475 - 470 475 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.2 16.8 24.1

HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 310 982 - - 983 - - 234
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.012 - - 0.012 - - 0.195
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.8 8.7 - - 8.7 - - 24.1
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.7
HCM 2010 TWSC
1: N. Main Street & Menke Street 02/17/2022
1 Preston TA 4:00 pm 01/30/2022 Existing+P PM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 1 9 9 1 13 11 1446 22 27 1063 21
Future Vol, veh/h 10 1 9 9 1 13 11 1446 22 27 1063 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 75 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 1 10 10 1 14 12 1572 24 29 1155 23
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2036 2845 589 2244 2844 798 1178 0 0 1596 0 0 Stage 1 1225 1225 - 1608 1608 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 811 1620 - 636 1236 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 33 17 452 23 17 329 589 - - 407 - -
Stage 1 190 249 - 109 162 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 339 160 - 433 246 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 28 15 452 20 15 329 589 - - 407 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 28 15 - 20 15 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 186 231 - 107 159 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 316 157 - 392 229 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 144.5 183.3 0.1 0.4

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 589 - - 45 41 407 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - - 0.483 0.61 0.072 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.2 - - 144.5 183.3 14.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1.8 2.2 0.2 - -
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Rossi Street & N. Main Street 02/17/2022
1 Preston TA 4:00 pm 01/30/2022 Existing+P PM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 200 305 117 99 254 180 128 1128 80 110 783 159 Future Volume (veh/h) 200 305 117 99 254 180 128 1128 80 110 783 159 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 217 332 127 108 276 0 139 1226 87 120 851 0 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 291 379 323 136 365 311 172 1552 694 151 1509 675 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.20 0.00 0.10 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.43 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 217 332 127 108 276 0 139 1226 87 120 851 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 15.9 6.4 5.5 12.8 0.0 7.1 27.3 3.0 6.1 16.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 15.9 6.4 5.5 12.8 0.0 7.1 27.3 3.0 6.1 16.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 291 379 323 136 365 311 172 1552 694 151 1509 675 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.87 0.39 0.79 0.76 0.00 0.81 0.79 0.13 0.80 0.56 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 356 436 371 183 436 371 261 2138 957 222 2061 922 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.1 35.4 31.7 41.7 34.8 0.0 40.6 22.1 15.3 41.3 19.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.7 16.1 0.8 15.3 6.1 0.0 10.5 1.4 0.1 11.6 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.0 9.8 2.9 3.3 7.2 0.0 3.9 13.6 1.3 3.5 8.2 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.8 51.6 32.4 57.0 41.0 0.0 51.1 23.6 15.4 52.9 20.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D C E D D C B D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 676 384 1452 971
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.8 45.5 25.7 24.3
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.3 44.8 11.6 23.2 13.4 43.7 12.3 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.5 55.5 9.5 21.5 13.5 53.5 9.5 21.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.1 29.3 7.5 17.9 9.1 18.7 7.7 14.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 11.0 0.0 0.8 0.1 7.1 0.1 0.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 31.6
HCM 2010 LOS C
HCM 2010 TWSC
3: Rossi Street & Martella Street 02/17/2022
1 Preston TA 4:00 pm 01/30/2022 Existing+P PM Synchro 10 Report Hexagon Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 581 4 19 525 16 3 0 19 19 1 17
Future Vol, veh/h 15 581 4 19 525 16 3 0 19 19 1 17
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 190 - - 80 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 16 632 4 21 571 17 3 0 21 21 1 18
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 588 0 0 636 0 0 1297 1296 634 1299 1290 580 Stage 1 - - - - - - 666 666 - 622 622 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 631 630 - 677 668 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 987 - - 947 - - 139 162 479 138 163 514 Stage 1 - - - - - - 449 457 - 474 479 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 469 475 - 443 456 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 987 - - 947 - - 129 156 479 128 157 514 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 129 156 - 128 157 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 442 450 - 466 468 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 441 465 - 417 449 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.3 16 27.9

HCM LOS C D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 350 987 - - 947 - - 197
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 0.017 - - 0.022 - - 0.204
HCM Control Delay (s) 16 8.7 - - 8.9 - - 27.9
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.7
Appendix E
Cultural Resources Study
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
4 3 7 F i g u e r o a S t re e t , S u i t e 2 0 3
Monterey, Californ ia 93940
8 3 1 3 3 3 0 3 1 0

in fo @ r i n c o n c o n s u l t a n t s .c o m
w w w . r i n c o n c o n s u l t a n ts .c o m
E n v i r o n m e n t a l S c i e n t i s t s P l a n n e r s E n g i n e e r s August 26, 2021
Project No. 21-10851
Master Agreement No. 17-04143
Lisa Brinton, Planning Manager
Community Development Department
City of Salinas
65 W. Alisal Street, 2nd Floor
Salinas, California 93901
Via email: [email protected]
cc: Megan Hunter, [email protected]
Subject: Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1 Preston Street Project Salinas, Monterey County, California
Dear Ms. Brinton:

The City of Salinas (City) retained Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) to conduct a cultural resources assessment for the proposed 1 Preston Street Project (project) in Salinas, Monterey County, California.

The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and local regulations.

The City is the lead agency under CEQA. This letter report documents the results of the assessment, which was conducted in support of CEQA review and consisted of a cultural resources records search, Sacred Lands File search, and a pedestrian field survey.

Project Location
The proposed project consists of Assessor’s Parcel Number 003-161-008-000, a 2.6-acre lot located at 1 Preston Street, Salinas, in Monterey County, California (Figure 1, Attachment 1). The proposed project site lies within Section 29 of Township 14 South, Range 3 East of the Salinas, Calif. (USGS 2021) topographic quadrangle (Figure 2, Attachment 1). The project site is bounded by residential and commercial development to the east, and a channelized river to the north, west, and south. The proposed project site is currently vacant and unpaved.

Project Description
The project consists of a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Code Amendment to modify the existing vacant 2.6-acre lot from Residential Medium Density (R-M-3.6) to Residential High Density (R-H-2.1). The project does not involve construction or other physical changes. Because there are currently no development proposals, this Initial Study analyzes the maximum potential buildout of the site, using reasonable assumptions for construction, building height, and other design features. Depending on the final design of proposed development facilitated by the rezoning project, additional project-specific CEQA review may be required, as determined by the City upon receipt of a complete project-specific application. With full buildout and anticipating a density bonus, future development on the site may City of Salinas
Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1 Preston Street Project

Page 2 ends

Salinas City CouncilJune 13, 2023

Salinas City Council
June 13, 2023