Agenda Packet — Salinas City Council, May 7, 2024 (part 3 of 9)

City of Salinas - 2023 PMP Update
Reference Reports - Sections Sorted by PCI (High to Low) District Street ID Road Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC ST Lanes Length Width Area Current PCI (10-11-23) Last Calc PCI Date Last Calc PCI PCI Range Condition Category Last MnR Date Last MnR Treatment Dist 4 SUNST SUN ST 40 COMMISSION ST END R A 2 454 41 18,625 19 01/26/23 21 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEAL Dist 4 TARPCIR TARP CIR 10 SIMAS ST END R A 2 339 37 12,543 19 03/17/23 21 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEAL Dist 2 BELLEHAVEN BELLEHAVEN ST 15 WILLIAMS RD TOWT ST R A 2 1,684 32 53,900 18 03/13/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 02/27/19 DEEP PATCHDist 3 CYPRESSST CYPRESS ST 10 CENTRAL AVE END R A 2 238 37 8,806 18 01/25/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 SLURRY SEAL Dist 3 FAIRFAXCIR FAIRFAX CIR 10 W ALISAL ST END R A 2 232 32 7,452 18 01/25/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 07/11/19 SHALLOW PATCH Dist 5 GARFIELDCI GARFIELD CIR 10 SWANER AVE END R A 2 155 26 4,030 18 03/02/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEAL Dist 3 LAMESAWAY LA MESA WAY 10 LA MESA DR E BLANCO RD R A 2 135 37 4,995 18 01/18/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEALDist 4 LAPOSADAWA LA POSADA WAY 10 SHERWOOD DR LA POSADA DR R A 2 135 32 4,320 18 02/17/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/07 SLURRY SEAL Dist 3 NACACIACIR N ACACIA CIR 10 W ACACIA ST END R A 2 156 32 4,993 18 03/16/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 08/28/20 SKIN PATCH Dist 5 NAVAJODR NAVAJO DR 35 MOHAWK AVE N 1ST ST C A 2 946 37 35,002 18 02/16/23 22 20-11 Failed (30-0) Dist 5 RUSSELLRD RUSSELL RD 60 PAUL AVE SAN JUAN GRADE RD A A 2 332 32 10,624 18 02/09/23 21 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/09/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 3 SALINASST SALINAS ST 20 JOHN ST CLAY ST A A 2 336 38 12,768 18 01/26/23 21 20-11 Failed (30-0) 10/31/19 SHALLOW PATCH Dist 3 SANTAROSAA SANTA ROSA AVE 10 NACIONAL ST PARK ST R A 2 466 32 14,921 18 03/16/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 03/25/19 SHALLOW PATCH Dist 2 SKYPL SKY PL 10 ALMA AVE END R A 2 245 32 7,855 18 03/13/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEAL Dist 3 STANNDR ST ANN DR 10 BELMONT DR ARCHER ST R A 2 1,256 32 40,214 18 03/16/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEAL Dist 3 BELAIRWAY BEL AIR WAY 10 W ACACIA ST FAIRFAX DR R A 2 423 32 13,558 17 01/25/23 19 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEAL Dist 5 CHEROKEECT CHEROKEE CT 10 CHEROKEE DR (N) CHEROKEE DR (S) R A 2 1,646 32 52,686 17 02/16/23 19 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 SLURRY SEAL Dist 5 DURANST DURAN ST 10 CHEROKEE DR SEVILLE ST R A 2 1,052 32 33,664 17 02/10/23 19 20-11 Failed (30-0) 03/26/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 3 FRONTST FRONT ST 070WB PCC END MERGE TO E MARKET ST A A 1 434 18 7,812 17 02/10/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) Dist 2 GARNERAVE GARNER AVE 030 N SANBORN RD BEECH ST C A 2 1,224 42 51,408 17 02/02/23 21 20-11 Failed (30-0) 05/21/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 3 PARAISOCT PARAISO CT 10 VIA PARAISO (N) VIA PARAISO (S) R A 2 970 32 31,040 17 01/19/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEAL Dist 5 PIMACIR PIMA CIR 10 CHEROKEE DR END R A 2 180 32 5,760 17 02/16/23 19 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEALDist 3 SANTAMONIC SANTA MONICA CT 10 SANTA MONICA WAY END R A 2 363 35 12,705 17 01/24/23 19 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEAL Dist 3 STANFORDAV STANFORD AVE 10 HASTINGS AVE LEMOS AVE R A 2 678 32 21,708 17 01/25/23 19 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEALDist 2 DEWEYAVE DEWEY AVE 10 BEECH ST TOWT ST R A 2 412 52 21,424 16 03/13/23 18 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEAL Dist 4 OREGONST OREGON ST 10 N SANBORN RD WASHINGTON DR C A 2 191 38 7,276 16 03/03/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0) 03/20/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 4 PEACHDR PEACH DR 15 CALLE CEBU COMMISSION ST R A 2 952 32 30,488 16 01/26/23 18 20-11 Failed (30-0) 06/17/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 1 RIDERAVE RIDER AVE 010 GARNER AVE LAS CASITAS DR C A 2 1,864 38 70,832 16 02/01/23 20 20-11 Failed (30-0)Dist 2 SANBENITOS SAN BENITO ST 020 S MADEIRA AVE END R A 2 398 42 16,716 16 01/19/23 18 20-11 Failed (30-0) Dist 4 TOPPL TOP PL 15 CEDAR ST END R A 2 422 26 10,972 16 03/03/23 18 20-11 Failed (30-0)Dist 3 VIAPARAISO VIA PARAISO 25 LOS PALOS DR LA MESA DR R A 2 1,626 32 52,052 16 01/19/23 19 20-11 Failed (30-0) 06/25/21 SKIN PATCHDist 3 ABBOTTPL ABBOTT PL 15 N END S END R A 2 787 44 34,628 15 01/18/23 17 20-11 Failed (30-0) Dist 4 BRIDGEST BRIDGE ST 10 N MAIN ST E MENKE ST R A 2 680 24 16,320 15 03/17/23 17 20-11 Failed (30-0) Dist 5 CACERASCIR CACERAS CIR 10 CHEROKEE DR END R A 2 480 32 15,360 15 02/10/23 17 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 SLURRY SEAL Dist 2 PEARLALY PEARL ALY 10 S PEARL ST 220' E/O S PEARL ST R A 2 220 20 4,400 15 01/19/23 17 20-11 Failed (30-0) Dist 2 WIRENST WIREN ST 10 WILLIAMS RD N. END R A 2 1,000 32 32,000 15 03/15/23 17 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/91 CAPE SEALDist 2 JOHNCIR JOHN CIR 10 JOHN ST END R A 2 273 32 8,761 14 01/17/23 17 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 CAPE SEAL Dist 4 OREGONST OREGON ST 20 WASHINGTON DR TOWT ST C A 2 1,466 38 55,713 14 03/03/23 18 20-11 Failed (30-0) 02/07/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 3 RIKERST RIKER ST 010 W MARKET ST 320' S/O W MARKET ST R A 2 320 37 11,840 14 01/23/23 16 20-11 Failed (30-0)Dist 3 SANVINCENT SAN VINCENTE AVE 020 SANTA PAULA DR W ACACIA ST C A 2 567 32 18,144 14 01/24/23 18 20-11 Failed (30-0) 05/16/19 DEEP PATCHDist 2 MORTENSENA MORTENSEN AVE 020 SKYWAY BLVD MERCER WAY R A 2 1,028 55 56,540 13 01/17/23 16 20-11 Failed (30-0) Dist 4 NFILICEST N FILICE ST 10 E ALISAL ST N END (BARRICADE) R A 2 105 44 4,620 13 03/17/23 15 20-11 Failed (30-0) Dist 1 TOWTST TOWT ST 020 MAE AVE DEL MONTE AVE C A 2 1,000 32 32,000 13 02/03/23 17 20-11 Failed (30-0) 01/01/01 SLURRY SEAL Dist 4 CHERRYDR CHERRY DR 10 SHERWOOD DR PEACH DR R A 2 701 32 22,459 12 01/26/23 15 20-11 Failed (30-0) 03/26/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 2 GARNERAVE GARNER AVE 040 BEECH ST 1ST AVE C A 2 1,494 41 61,254 11 02/02/23 15 20-11 Failed (30-0) 04/05/19 DEEP PATCHDist 2 TOWTST TOWT ST 030 DEL MONTE AVE CORTEZ ST C A 2 768 36 27,648 11 02/03/23 15 20-11 Failed (30-0) 03/20/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 4 SUNST SUN ST 20 CALLE CEBU E MARKET ST R A 2 683 32 21,856 10 01/26/23 13 10-0 Failed (30-0) 08/07/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 3 BURTONAVE BURTON AVE 10 HARKINS RD END R A 2 1,180 42 49,560 9 01/17/23 12 10-0 Failed (30-0) 05/21/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 2 JEFFERYAVE JEFFERY AVE 10 SKYWAY BLVD MERCER WAY R A 2 1,043 36 37,564 9 01/17/23 12 10-0 Failed (30-0) Dist 3 MARTELLAST MARTELLA ST 30 W LAKE ST SOUTH END R A 2 175 32 5,600 9 03/16/23 11 10-0 Failed (30-0) 03/06/19 DEEP PATCH Dist 4 BRIDGEST BRIDGE ST 20 E MENKE ST E ROSSI ST R A 2 410 30 12,300 8 03/17/23 10 10-0 Failed (30-0) 01/02/19 DEEP PATCHDist 1 CAOBAWAY CAOBA WAY 20 AMARILLO WAY END R A 2 169 37 6,253 7 02/01/23 10 10-0 Failed (30-0)Dist 3 DAYTONST DAYTON ST 10 HARKINS RD END R A 2 1,635 42 68,670 7 01/17/23 10 10-0 Failed (30-0) 07/05/19 DEEP PATCHDist 3 VALEST VALE ST 10 W MARKET ST END R A 2 234 47 10,998 7 03/15/23 9 10-0 Failed (30-0)

Page 32 of 33 ends

Page 33 of 33 ends

Current PCI Condition
Printed: 10/11/2023
City of Salinas
Test
Feature Legend
Category I - Excellent/ Good
Category II - Fair (Non-Load)
Category III - Fair (Load)
Category IV - Poor
Category V - Failed
Functional Class
City of Salinas
Test
Feature Legend
A - Arterial
C - Collector
R - Residential/Local
Current PCI Condition
Printed: 10/11/2023
City of Salinas
Test
Feature Legend
Category I - Good
Category II - Fair (Non-Load)
Category III - Fair (Load)
Appendix A
Summarized System Information
City of Salinas Network Summary Statistics
Printed: 10/11/2023
Total Sections Total Center Miles Total Lane Miles Total Area (sq. ft.) PCI Arterial 279 51.20 177.46 16,532,638.77 62
Collector 188 46.59 106.97 10,432,533.97 52
Residential/Local 1,253 194.17 388.16 35,324,561.24 49
Total 1,720 291.96 672.59
Overall Network PCI as of 10/11/2023: 53
** Combined Sections are excluded from totals. These Sections do not have a PCI Date - they have not been inspected or had a Treatment applied. **Combined 2 0.14 0.18 N/A
62,289,733.98
14,500
Gravel 2 0.14 0.18 14,500 N/A
Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Functional Class Surface Type Lane Miles Unit Cost/
Square Foot
Cost To Replace/ (in
thousands)
Pavement Area/
Square Feet
Arterial AC 134.1 $19.60 12,827,528 $251,420
AC/AC 19.9 $19.60 1,641,565 $32,175
AC/PCC 7.2 $19.60 775,506 $15,200
PCC 16.3 $19.60 1,288,039 $25,246
Collector AC 95.9 $18.20 9,250,424 $168,358
AC/AC 3.3 $18.20 316,458 $5,760
AC/PCC 5.2 $18.20 596,066 $10,848
PCC 2.5 $18.20 269,586 $4,906
Residential/Local AC 353.7 $16.80 32,233,597 $541,524
AC/AC 2.6 $16.80 254,877 $4,282
AC/PCC 12.5 $16.80 1,190,576 $20,002
PCC 19.3 $16.80 1,645,511 $27,645
Network Replacement Cost
Printed: 10/02/2023
City of Salinas
Criteria: Functional Class <> NCR - Proposed; Private;
Non-County
1 MTC StreetSaver
Grand Total: 672.6 62,289,733 $1,107,364
Arterial AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.56 4 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $6.53 8
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $50.40 2
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $13.86 8
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $50.40
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $104.71
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $176.40
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.56 4 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $6.53 8
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $50.40 2
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $13.86 8
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $50.40
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $104.71
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $176.40
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.56 4 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $6.53 8
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $50.40 2
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $13.86 8
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $50.40
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $104.71
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $176.40
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Salinas
Printed: 9/29/2023
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Arterial PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.56 4 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $104.71
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $176.40
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Salinas
Printed: 9/29/2023
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Collector AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.25 4 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $6.53 8
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $44.10 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $12.60 8
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $44.10
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $91.35
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $163.80
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.25 4 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $6.53 8
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $44.10 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $12.60 8
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $44.10
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $91.35
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $163.80
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.25 4 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $6.53 8
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $44.10 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $12.60 8
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $44.10
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $91.35
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $163.80
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Salinas
Printed: 9/29/2023
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 3 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Collector PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.25 4 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $91.35
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $163.80
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $20.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Salinas
Printed: 9/29/2023
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 4 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Residential/Local AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.25 5 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $6.53 10
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $44.10 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $12.60 10 III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $44.10
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $75.60
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $151.20
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.25 5 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $6.53 10
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $44.10 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $12.60 10 III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $44.10
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $75.60
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $151.20
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.25 5 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $6.53 10
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $44.10 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $12.60 10 III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $44.10
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $75.60
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $151.20
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Salinas
Printed: 9/29/2023
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 5 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Residential/Local PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.25 5 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $75.60
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $151.20
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Salinas
Printed: 9/29/2023
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 6 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Other AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.25 5 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $6.53 10
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $44.10 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $12.60 10 III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $44.10
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $75.60
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $151.20
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 10
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $16.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 5 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 10
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Salinas
Printed: 9/29/2023
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 7 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Other PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 5 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Salinas
Printed: 9/29/2023
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 8 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Appendix B
Budget Scenarios
Needs Analysis
&
Zero Budget
($378 Million over 5 Years)
• Projected PCI/Cost Summary
Year PCI Treated PCI Untreated PM Cost Rehab Cost Cost
2024 88 53 $2,140,278 $352,462,413 $354,602,691
2025 83 50 $145,558 $1,369,187 $1,514,745
2026 82 47 $382,288 $4,179,124 $4,561,412
2027 81 45 $4,880,111 $5,102,976 $9,983,088
2028 80 42 $4,044,852 $2,897,697 $6,942,549
Total Cost
$377,604,485
PM Total Cost
$11,593,088
% PM

3.07% $366,011,397
Rehab Total Cost
Needs - Projected PCI/Cost
Summary
Printed: 10/11/2023
City of Salinas
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00%
Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Increase PCI by 5
($191 Million over 5 Years)
• Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
• Network Condition Summary
• Cost Summary
City of Salinas
Interest: 0.00%
Target-Driven Scenarios
Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Year Arterial
Annual budget needs to meet target objectives
Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Preventative
Maintenance
Target: By Year
Scenario: Increase by 5 (53-58)
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Year Value Year Value Year Value Year Value
Year 1 54 Year 2 55 Year 3 56 Year 4 57
Year 5 58
2024 $2,175,079 $1,510,474 $4,537,974 $0 $2,140,278 $8,223,527 2025 $22,662,827 $281,139 $17,755,520 $0 $145,558 $40,699,486 2026 $8,965,101 $2,736,004 $29,683,424 $0 $2,788 $41,384,529 2027 $32,522,126 $10,841,634 $7,399,649 $0 $678,553 $50,763,409 2028 $27,491,233 $5,143,597 $16,951,610 $0 $357,029 $49,586,439 Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network prior to treatments in lane miles.

Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.

Grand Total: $190,657,391
Average Yearly Total: $38,131,478
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 62 11.4% 7.7% 14
Collector 51 4.3% 8.3% 7
Residential 49 13.1% 31.3% 11
2024
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 63 48.1% 28.9% 15
Collector 53 28.7% 49.5% 8
Residential 50 25.3% 55.3% 12
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.

Scenarios Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
2025
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 67 56.7% 22.3% 16
Collector 49 27.8% 53.6% 7
Residential 51 34.2% 51.7% 13
2026
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 66 53.0% 21.1% 17
Collector 47 27.0% 55.8% 7
Residential 54 43.6% 44.0% 15
2027
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 72 62.4% 12.8% 19
Collector 48 38.5% 49.6% 9
Residential 53 45.0% 44.0% 15
2028
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 76 68.6% 5.1% 20
Collector 47 41.4% 49.6% 10
Residential 53 46.5% 42.2% 16
City of Salinas Target-Driven Scenarios
Network Condition Summary
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Year Never Treated With Selected Treatment Without Selected Treatment Target: By Year
Scenario: Increase by 5 (53-58)
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Year Value Year Value Year Value Year Value
Year 1 54 Year 2 55 Year 3 56 Year 4 57
Year 5 58
2024 53 54 53
2025 50 55 50
2026 47 56 47
2027 45 57 45
2028 42 58 42
Percent Network Area by Functional Classification and Condition Class Condition in base year 2024, prior to applying treatments.

Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 11.4% 4.3% 13.1% 0.0% 28.8%
II / III 7.5% 4.1% 12.3% 0.0% 23.9%
IV 7.0% 6.7% 22.7% 0.0% 36.3%
V 0.7% 1.6% 8.7% 0.0% 11.0%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition in year 2024 after schedulable treatments applied.

Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 12.8% 4.8% 14.4% 0.0% 31.9%
II / III 6.1% 3.7% 11.0% 0.0% 20.8%
IV 7.0% 6.7% 22.7% 0.0% 36.3%
V 0.7% 1.6% 8.7% 0.0% 11.0%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition in year 2028 after schedulable treatments applied.

Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 18.2% 6.9% 26.4% 0.0% 51.5%
II / III 7.0% 1.5% 6.4% 0.0% 14.9%
IV 1.4% 1.5% 4.8% 0.0% 7.7%
V 0.0% 6.8% 19.1% 0.0% 25.9%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
City of Salinas Target-Driven Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Target: By Year
Scenario: Increase by 5 (53-58)
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Year Value Year Value Year Value Year Value
Year 1 54 Year 2 55 Year 3 56 Year 4 57
Year 5 58
2024 $1,577,737
$4,505,512
$0
$2,140,278
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $6,083,249
$0
$8,223,527 $346,379,164
2025 $3,369,928
$689,550
$36,494,450
$145,558
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $40,553,928
$0
$40,699,486 $348,869,378
2026 $1,136,755
$1,138,006
$39,106,980
$2,788
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $41,381,741
$0
$41,384,529 $357,774,623
2027 $1,575,332
$223,813
$21,450,674
$678,553
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $50,084,856
$26,835,038
$50,763,409 $341,650,887
2028 $170,315
$241,060
$13,452,070
$357,029
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $49,229,411
$35,365,966
$49,586,440 $323,557,765
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Summary
Arterial $92,929,328 $887,038
Collector $20,093,996 $418,851
Residential/Local $74,309,860 $2,018,317
Total: $187,333,184 $3,324,206 Grand Total: $190,657,390 Year Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Total Cost Deferred Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Maintain 53 PCI
($116 Million over 5 Years)
• Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
• Network Condition Summary
• Cost Summary
City of Salinas
Interest: 0.00%
Target-Driven Scenarios
Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Year Arterial
Annual budget needs to meet target objectives
Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Preventative
Maintenance
Target: Overall 53
Scenario: Maintain 53 PCI
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
2024 $101,694 $2,346 $281,128 $0 $385,167 $385,167
2025 $1,948,650 $1,329,379 $19,397,824 $0 $1,900,669 $22,675,854 2026 $786,492 $653,204 $25,664,810 $0 $2,788 $27,104,506 2027 $15,481,260 $3,958,486 $13,119,608 $0 $678,553 $32,559,354 2028 $9,311,937 $12,933,185 $11,377,856 $0 $353,922 $33,622,979 Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network prior to treatments in lane miles.

Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.

Grand Total: $116,347,859
Average Yearly Total: $23,269,572
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 62 11.4% 7.7% 14
Collector 51 4.3% 8.3% 7
Residential 49 13.1% 31.3% 11
2024
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 62 43.0% 28.9% 14
Collector 52 25.8% 49.5% 7
Residential 49 23.0% 55.3% 11
2025
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 60 42.9% 33.9% 14
Collector 49 26.9% 53.6% 7
Residential 51 33.1% 52.3% 13
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.

Scenarios Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
2026
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 58 36.3% 36.9% 13
Collector 45 23.2% 57.6% 7
Residential 53 41.0% 45.9% 15
2027
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 60 43.4% 31.8% 14
Collector 44 28.0% 58.3% 7
Residential 53 44.6% 44.0% 15
2028
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 60 45.3% 28.3% 15
Collector 46 39.6% 51.4% 10
Residential 52 45.2% 43.2% 16
City of Salinas Target-Driven Scenarios
Network Condition Summary
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Year Never Treated With Selected Treatment Without Selected Treatment Target: Overall 53
Scenario: Maintain 53 PCI
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
2024 53 53 53
2025 50 53 50
2026 47 53 47
2027 45 53 45
2028 42 53 42
Percent Network Area by Functional Classification and Condition Class Condition in base year 2024, prior to applying treatments.

Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 12.0% 6.6% 25.6% 0.0% 44.3%
II / III 7.0% 1.5% 6.6% 0.0% 15.1%
IV 3.3% 1.8% 4.9% 0.0% 10.0%
V 4.2% 6.8% 19.6% 0.0% 30.7%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
City of Salinas Target-Driven Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Target: Overall 53
Scenario: Maintain 53 PCI
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
2024 $0
$0
$0
$385,167
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $0
$0
$385,167 $354,217,524
2025 $4,303,273
$4,054,398
$12,417,513
$1,900,669
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $20,775,185
$0
$22,675,854 $374,731,370
2026 $959,859
$1,138,006
$25,003,852
$2,788
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $27,101,717
$0
$27,104,505 $397,916,638
2027 $1,670,150
$223,813
$29,986,838
$678,553
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $31,880,801
$0
$32,559,354 $400,058,059
2028 $170,315
$241,060
$27,983,516
$353,922
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $33,269,057
$4,874,165
$33,622,979 $398,197,581
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Summary
Arterial $26,745,244 $884,789
Collector $18,458,607 $417,993
Residential/Local $67,822,909 $2,018,317
Total: $113,026,760 $3,321,099 Grand Total: $116,347,859 Year Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Total Cost Deferred Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Current Funding
($35 Million over 5 Years)
• Network Condition Summary
• Cost Summary
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2024 $11,000,000 10%
2025 $6,000,000 10%
2026 $6,000,000 10%
2027 $6,000,000 10%
2028 $6,000,000 10%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated Lane
Miles
Year Never Treated
2024 53 54 47.96 111.08
2025 50 52 11.92 26.22
2026 47 50 13.18 29.54
2027 45 48 15.56 36.48
2028 42 46 23.16 55.21
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2024, prior to applying treatments.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 11.4% 4.3% 13.1% 0.0% 28.8%
II / III 7.5% 4.1% 12.3% 0.0% 23.9%
IV 7.0% 6.7% 22.7% 0.0% 36.3%
V 0.7% 1.6% 8.7% 0.0% 11.0%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2024 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 13.5% 4.8% 17.5% 0.0% 35.8%
II / III 5.4% 3.7% 7.9% 0.0% 16.9%
IV 7.0% 6.7% 22.7% 0.0% 36.3%
V 0.7% 1.6% 8.7% 0.0% 11.0%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2028 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 8.2% 3.4% 18.0% 0.0% 29.6%
II / III 7.8% 2.3% 6.4% 0.0% 16.5%
IV 6.3% 4.2% 12.3% 0.0% 22.8%
V 4.2% 6.8% 20.1% 0.0% 31.1%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 10/11/2023
City of Salinas
Scenario: Current Funding
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00%
Criteria: MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:
1 City of Salinas Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Scenario: Current Funding
2024 $11,000,000
$9,898,734
$4,859,851
$4,909,954
$128,929
$0
$1,098,490 $1,510 $343,605,467 $0
$1,179,840
10%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $6,000,000
$5,397,014
$644,022
$285,109
$4,467,883
$0
$599,754 $246 $380,798,398 $0
$2,043
10%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $6,000,000
$5,397,705
$799,816
$1,138,006
$3,459,883
$0
$590,380 $9,620 $425,100,086 $0
$6,569
10%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $6,000,000
$5,397,278
$628,677
$120,107
$4,648,494
$0
$594,266 $5,734 $457,516,271 $0
$22,278
10%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2028 $6,000,000
$5,371,947
$88,541
$207,417
$5,075,989
$0
$608,204 $0 $481,180,164 $0
$9,645
10%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $4,220,856 $886,784 $0 $168,024
Collector $2,213,756 $325,571 $0 $219,326
Residential/Local $25,028,066 $2,278,739 $0 $833,025
Grand Total: $31,462,678 $3,491,094 $0 $1,220,375
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver
Increased Funding
($43 Million over 5 Years)
• Network Condition Summary
• Cost Summary
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2024 $11,000,000 10%
2025 $10,000,000 10%
2026 $10,000,000 10%
2027 $6,000,000 10%
2028 $6,000,000 10%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated Lane
Miles
Year Never Treated
2024 53 54 47.96 111.08
2025 50 53 17.16 36.61
2026 47 51 12.59 28.34
2027 45 49 15.55 36.45
2028 42 47 23.16 55.21
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2024, prior to applying treatments.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 8.2% 3.4% 19.4% 0.0% 31.0%
II / III 7.8% 2.3% 6.4% 0.0% 16.5%
IV 6.3% 4.2% 10.9% 0.0% 21.4%
V 4.2% 6.8% 20.1% 0.0% 31.1%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 10/11/2023
City of Salinas
Scenario: Increased Funding
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00%
Criteria: MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:
1 City of Salinas Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Scenario: Increased Funding
2024 $11,000,000
$9,898,734
$4,859,851
$4,909,954
$128,929
$0
$1,098,490 $1,510 $343,605,467 $0
$1,179,840
10%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $10,000,000
$8,993,515
$663,860
$285,109
$8,044,546
$0
$997,910 $2,090 $376,803,742 $0
$2,043
10%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $10,000,000
$8,993,013
$815,108
$1,138,006
$7,039,898
$0
$192,225 $807,775 $417,908,278 $0
$6,569
10%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $6,000,000
$5,392,154
$628,677
$120,107
$4,643,370
$0
$594,266 $5,734 $450,329,587 $0
$22,278
10%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2028 $6,000,000
$5,371,947
$88,541
$207,417
$5,075,989
$0
$611,551 $0 $474,043,655 $0
$9,645
10%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $4,220,856 $886,784 $0 $168,024
Collector $2,213,756 $325,572 $0 $219,326
Residential/Local $32,214,750 $2,282,086 $0 $833,025
Grand Total: $38,649,362 $3,494,442 $0 $1,220,375
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver
Target PCI’s
Arterials 75, Collectors 65
($205 Million over 10 Years)
• Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
• Network Condition Summary
• Cost Summary
City of Salinas
Interest: 0.00%
Target-Driven Scenarios
Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Year Arterial
Annual budget needs to meet target objectives
Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Preventative
Maintenance
Target: By Functional Class and Year
Scenario: A-75, C-65
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Arterial Value Collector Value Residential/Local Value Other Value Year 1 63.3 Year 1 53.3 Year 1 Year 1
Year 2 64.6 Year 2 54.6 Year 2 Year 2
Year 3 65.9 Year 3 55.9 Year 3 Year 3
Year 4 67.2 Year 4 57.2 Year 4 Year 4
Year 5 68.5 Year 5 58.5 Year 5 Year 5
Year 6 69.8 Year 6 59.8 Year 6 Year 6
Year 7 71.1 Year 7 61.1 Year 7 Year 7
Year 8 72.4 Year 8 62.4 Year 8 Year 8
Year 9 73.7 Year 9 63.7 Year 9 Year 9
Year 10 75 Year 10 65 Year 10 Year 10
2024 $2,856,350 $3,163,583 $0 $0 $182,668 $6,019,934
2025 $13,375,993 $9,699,839 $0 $0 $131,819 $23,075,832
2026 $16,466,549 $10,859,395 $0 $0 $2,741 $27,325,944
2027 $14,608,578 $10,964,990 $0 $0 $639,528 $25,573,568 2028 $14,159,216 $9,990,299 $0 $0 $349,373 $24,149,515
2029 $14,137,993 $9,718,307 $0 $0 $352,095 $23,856,301
2030 $14,591,036 $6,786,818 $0 $0 $405,812 $21,377,854
2031 $13,077,293 $5,937,108 $0 $0 $783,176 $19,014,401
2032 $12,961,867 $5,790,582 $0 $0 $578,125 $18,752,449
2033 $10,366,724 $5,478,479 $0 $0 $1,490,159 $15,845,203 Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network prior to treatments in lane miles.

Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.

Grand Total: $204,991,001
Average Yearly Total: $20,499,100
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 62 11.4% 7.7% 14
Collector 51 4.3% 8.3% 7
Residential 49 13.1% 31.3% 11
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.

Scenarios Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
2024
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 63 50.8% 28.9% 15
Collector 54 32.9% 48.3% 9
Residential 49 23.0% 55.3% 11
2025
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 65 52.4% 27.1% 15
Collector 55 40.4% 43.6% 10
Residential 47 21.1% 56.5% 10
2026
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 66 51.7% 21.9% 17
Collector 56 45.2% 39.0% 12
Residential 44 19.5% 58.5% 10
2027
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 67 56.3% 18.9% 17
Collector 57 52.7% 35.5% 13
Residential 42 16.9% 60.9% 9
2028
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 69 58.1% 15.1% 18
Collector 59 57.9% 32.6% 14
Residential 39 14.0% 63.1% 8
2029
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 70 61.0% 11.0% 18
Collector 60 58.5% 28.3% 15
Residential 37 9.8% 64.4% 8
2030
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 71 60.7% 7.0% 19
Collector 62 60.2% 25.1% 15
Residential 34 5.8% 65.4% 7
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.

Scenarios Criteria: 3 MTC StreetSaver
2031
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 73 64.9% 4.9% 19
Collector 63 63.8% 22.8% 15
Residential 32 4.3% 67.6% 6
2032
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 74 69.6% 4.1% 20
Collector 64 65.7% 21.0% 16
Residential 30 4.0% 69.7% 6
2033
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 75 73.9% 6.5% 21
Collector 65 67.8% 20.3% 16
Residential 28 3.3% 72.1% 5
City of Salinas Target-Driven Scenarios
Network Condition Summary
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Year Never Treated With Selected Treatment Without Selected Treatment Target: By Functional Class and Year
Scenario: A-75, C-65
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Arterial Value Collector Value Residential/Local Value Other Value Year 1 63.3 Year 1 53.3 Year 1 Year 1
Year 2 64.6 Year 2 54.6 Year 2 Year 2
Year 3 65.9 Year 3 55.9 Year 3 Year 3
Year 4 67.2 Year 4 57.2 Year 4 Year 4
Year 5 68.5 Year 5 58.5 Year 5 Year 5
Year 6 69.8 Year 6 59.8 Year 6 Year 6
Year 7 71.1 Year 7 61.1 Year 7 Year 7
Year 8 72.4 Year 8 62.4 Year 8 Year 8
Year 9 73.7 Year 9 63.7 Year 9 Year 9
Year 10 75 Year 10 65 Year 10 Year 10
2024 53 54 53
2025 50 53 50
2026 47 52 47
2027 45 51 45
2028 42 50 42
2029 39 49 39
2030 36 49 36
2031 33 48 33
2032 31 47 31
2033 29 47 29
Percent Network Area by Functional Classification and Condition Class Condition in base year 2024, prior to applying treatments.

Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 13.5% 5.5% 13.1% 0.0% 32.0%
II / III 5.4% 3.1% 12.3% 0.0% 20.8%
IV 7.0% 6.5% 22.7% 0.0% 36.1%
V 0.7% 1.6% 8.7% 0.0% 11.0%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition in year 2033 after schedulable treatments applied.

Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 19.6% 11.4% 1.9% 0.0% 32.8%
II / III 5.2% 2.0% 13.9% 0.0% 21.2%
IV 0.7% 0.0% 11.4% 0.0% 12.1%
V 1.0% 3.4% 29.5% 0.0% 33.9%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
City of Salinas Target-Driven Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Target: By Functional Class and Year
Scenario: A-75, C-65
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Arterial Value Collector Value Residential/Local Value Other Value Year 1 63.3 Year 1 53.3 Year 1 Year 1
Year 2 64.6 Year 2 54.6 Year 2 Year 2
Year 3 65.9 Year 3 55.9 Year 3 Year 3
Year 4 67.2 Year 4 57.2 Year 4 Year 4
Year 5 68.5 Year 5 58.5 Year 5 Year 5
Year 6 69.8 Year 6 59.8 Year 6 Year 6
Year 7 71.1 Year 7 61.1 Year 7 Year 7
Year 8 72.4 Year 8 62.4 Year 8 Year 8
Year 9 73.7 Year 9 63.7 Year 9 Year 9
Year 10 75 Year 10 65 Year 10 Year 10
2024 $2,148,524
$2,492,544
$1,196,198
$182,668
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $5,837,266
$0
$6,019,934 $348,582,757
2025 $490,825
$0
$22,453,188
$131,819
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $22,944,013
$0
$23,075,832 $368,697,214
2026 $391,215
$1,138,006
$23,529,945
$2,741
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $27,323,203
$2,264,037
$27,325,944 $391,661,633
2027 $1,575,332
$0
$8,951,326
$639,528
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $24,934,039
$14,407,382
$25,573,567 $400,906,915
2028 $170,315
$0
$5,753,641
$349,373
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $23,800,142
$17,876,186
$24,149,515 $405,723,069
Year Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Total Cost Deferred Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
2029 $0
$0
$2,118,331
$352,095
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $23,504,206
$21,385,875
$23,856,301 $407,309,709
2030 $371,070
$0
$1,571,468
$405,812
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $20,972,042
$19,029,504
$21,377,854 $400,114,014
2031 $527,675
$0
$6,533,024
$783,176
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $18,231,225
$11,170,526
$19,014,401 $403,690,340
2032 $377,679
$0
$11,653,572
$578,125
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $18,174,324
$6,143,074
$18,752,449 $413,759,131
2033 $249,346
$0
$12,919,751
$1,490,159
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $14,355,045
$1,185,948
$15,845,204 $432,909,207
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Summary
Arterial $123,504,851 $3,096,748
Collector $76,570,653 $1,818,749
Residential/Local $0 $0
Total: $200,075,504 $4,915,497 Grand Total: $204,991,001 Year Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Total Cost Deferred Scenarios Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
Target PCI’s
Arterials 75, Collectors 65, Residentials 50
($327 Million over 10 Years)
• Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
• Network Condition Summary
• Cost Summary
City of Salinas
Interest: 0.00%
Target-Driven Scenarios
Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Year Arterial
Annual budget needs to meet target objectives
Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Preventative
Maintenance
Target: By Functional Class and Year
Scenario: A-75, C-65, R-50
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Arterial Value Collector Value Residential/Local Value Other Value Year 1 63.3 Year 1 53.3 Year 1 50 Year 1
Year 2 64.6 Year 2 54.6 Year 2 50 Year 2
Year 3 65.9 Year 3 55.9 Year 3 50 Year 3
Year 4 67.2 Year 4 57.2 Year 4 50 Year 4
Year 5 68.5 Year 5 58.5 Year 5 50 Year 5
Year 6 69.8 Year 6 59.8 Year 6 50 Year 6
Year 7 71.1 Year 7 61.1 Year 7 50 Year 7
Year 8 72.4 Year 8 62.4 Year 8 50 Year 8
Year 9 73.7 Year 9 63.7 Year 9 50 Year 9
Year 10 75 Year 10 65 Year 10 50 Year 10
2024 $2,856,350 $3,163,583 $3,785,847 $0 $2,140,278 $9,805,781 2025 $13,375,993 $9,699,839 $12,200,914 $0 $145,558 $35,276,746 2026 $16,466,549 $10,859,395 $13,186,581 $0 $2,788 $40,512,524 2027 $14,608,578 $10,964,990 $13,293,923 $0 $678,553 $38,867,491 2028 $14,159,216 $9,990,299 $14,278,266 $0 $357,270 $38,427,781 2029 $14,137,993 $9,718,307 $13,721,918 $0 $1,045,421 $37,578,219 2030 $14,591,036 $6,786,818 $15,344,968 $0 $447,246 $36,722,821 2031 $13,077,293 $5,937,108 $13,897,942 $0 $787,481 $32,912,343 2032 $12,961,867 $5,790,582 $12,141,707 $0 $625,655 $30,894,156 2033 $10,366,724 $5,478,479 $9,744,192 $0 $2,307,102 $25,589,396 Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network prior to treatments in lane miles.

Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.

Grand Total: $326,587,259
Average Yearly Total: $32,658,726
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 62 11.4% 7.7% 14
Collector 51 4.3% 8.3% 7
Residential 49 13.1% 31.3% 11
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.

Scenarios Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
2024
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 63 50.8% 28.9% 15
Collector 54 32.9% 48.3% 9
Residential 50 24.8% 55.3% 12
2025
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 65 52.4% 27.1% 15
Collector 55 40.4% 43.6% 10
Residential 50 32.0% 53.8% 12
2026
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 66 51.7% 21.9% 17
Collector 56 45.2% 39.0% 12
Residential 50 35.6% 51.6% 13
2027
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 67 56.3% 18.9% 17
Collector 57 52.7% 35.5% 13
Residential 50 39.2% 49.6% 14
2028
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 69 58.1% 15.1% 18
Collector 59 57.9% 32.6% 14
Residential 50 41.8% 47.0% 15
2029
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 70 61.0% 11.0% 18
Collector 60 58.5% 28.3% 15
Residential 50 43.6% 44.7% 15
2030
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 71 60.7% 7.0% 19
Collector 62 60.2% 25.1% 15
Residential 50 43.8% 42.5% 16
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.

Scenarios Criteria: 3 MTC StreetSaver
2031
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 73 64.9% 4.9% 19
Collector 63 63.8% 22.8% 15
Residential 50 46.0% 40.8% 16
2032
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 74 69.6% 4.1% 20
Collector 64 65.7% 21.0% 16
Residential 50 46.4% 39.4% 16
2033
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
Functional Class Life
Arterial 75 73.9% 6.5% 21
Collector 65 67.8% 20.3% 16
Residential 50 47.9% 38.5% 17
City of Salinas Target-Driven Scenarios
Network Condition Summary
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Year Never Treated With Selected Treatment Without Selected Treatment Target: By Functional Class and Year
Scenario: A-75, C-65, R-50
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Arterial Value Collector Value Residential/Local Value Other Value Year 1 63.3 Year 1 53.3 Year 1 50 Year 1
Year 2 64.6 Year 2 54.6 Year 2 50 Year 2
Year 3 65.9 Year 3 55.9 Year 3 50 Year 3
Year 4 67.2 Year 4 57.2 Year 4 50 Year 4
Year 5 68.5 Year 5 58.5 Year 5 50 Year 5
Year 6 69.8 Year 6 59.8 Year 6 50 Year 6
Year 7 71.1 Year 7 61.1 Year 7 50 Year 7
Year 8 72.4 Year 8 62.4 Year 8 50 Year 8
Year 9 73.7 Year 9 63.7 Year 9 50 Year 9
Year 10 75 Year 10 65 Year 10 50 Year 10
2024 53 54 53
2025 50 55 50
2026 47 55 47
2027 45 56 45
2028 42 56 42
2029 39 57 39
2030 36 58 36
2031 33 58 33
2032 31 59 31
2033 29 59 29
Percent Network Area by Functional Classification and Condition Class Condition in base year 2024, prior to applying treatments.

Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 13.5% 5.5% 14.1% 0.0% 33.1%
II / III 5.4% 3.1% 11.3% 0.0% 19.8%
IV 7.0% 6.5% 22.7% 0.0% 36.1%
V 0.7% 1.6% 8.7% 0.0% 11.0%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition in year 2033 after schedulable treatments applied.

Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 19.6% 11.4% 27.1% 0.0% 58.1%
II / III 5.2% 2.0% 7.8% 0.0% 15.0%
IV 0.7% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 1.3%
V 1.0% 3.4% 21.2% 0.0% 25.6%
Total 26.5% 16.7% 56.7% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
City of Salinas Target-Driven Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 0.00% Printed: 10/11/2023
Target: By Functional Class and Year
Scenario: A-75, C-65, R-50
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Arterial Value Collector Value Residential/Local Value Other Value Year 1 63.3 Year 1 53.3 Year 1 50 Year 1
Year 2 64.6 Year 2 54.6 Year 2 50 Year 2
Year 3 65.9 Year 3 55.9 Year 3 50 Year 3
Year 4 67.2 Year 4 57.2 Year 4 50 Year 4
Year 5 68.5 Year 5 58.5 Year 5 50 Year 5
Year 6 69.8 Year 6 59.8 Year 6 50 Year 6
Year 7 71.1 Year 7 61.1 Year 7 50 Year 7
Year 8 72.4 Year 8 62.4 Year 8 50 Year 8
Year 9 73.7 Year 9 63.7 Year 9 50 Year 9
Year 10 75 Year 10 65 Year 10 50 Year 10
2024 $2,645,520
$3,823,785
$1,196,198
$2,140,278
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $7,665,503
$0
$9,805,781 $344,796,910
2025 $3,262,177
$1,371,277
$30,497,734
$145,558
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $35,131,188
$0
$35,276,746 $352,709,864
2026 $947,587
$1,138,006
$36,160,105
$2,788
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $40,509,736
$2,264,037
$40,512,524 $362,487,113
2027 $1,575,332
$223,813
$21,982,411
$678,553
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $38,188,938
$14,407,382
$38,867,491 $357,983,022
2028 $170,315
$241,060
$19,782,951
$357,270
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $38,070,512
$17,876,186
$38,427,782 $348,122,012
Year Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Total Cost Deferred Scenarios Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
2029 $861,302
$0
$10,045,342
$1,045,421
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $36,532,798
$25,626,154
$37,578,219 $335,517,514
2030 $371,070
$0
$3,573,424
$447,246
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $36,275,576
$32,331,081
$36,722,822 $312,017,038
2031 $540,073
$0
$10,700,145
$787,481
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $32,124,862
$20,884,644
$32,912,343 $294,244,504
2032 $510,709
$0
$14,934,101
$625,655
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $30,268,502
$14,823,692
$30,894,156 $283,102,305
2033 $1,187,170
$0
$15,557,711
$2,307,102
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Project
Total $23,282,294
$6,537,414
$25,589,396 $280,972,522
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Summary
Arterial $123,504,851 $3,096,748
Collector $76,570,653 $1,818,749
Residential/Local $117,974,404 $3,621,853
Total: $318,049,908 $8,537,350 Grand Total: $326,587,258 Year Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Total Cost Deferred Scenarios Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
Appendix C
Definitions
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 1

DEFINITIONS
This section is intended to define important pavement design acronyms and terms used when discussing a Pavement Management Program (PMP).

GENERAL TERMS
AC - Asphaltic Concrete - A plant mixed asphalt binder (asphalt cement that is classified according to the Standard Specification for Performance Graded Asphalt Binder) and aggregate (rocks) thoroughly mixed and compacted into a mass.

ALLIGATOR CRACKING - Alligator or fatigue cracking is a series of interconnecting cracks caused by fatigue failure of the asphalt concrete surface under repeated traffic loading. Cracking begins at the bottom of the asphalt surface (or stabilized base) where the stress and strain are highest under a wheel load. The cracks propagate to the surface initially as a series of parallel longitudinal cracks. After repeated traffic loading, the cracks connect, forming many sided, sharp-angled pieces that develop a pattern resembling chicken wire or the skin of an alligator. Alligator cracking occurs only in areas subjected to repeated traffic loading, such as wheel paths. (Pattern-type cracking that occurs over an entire area not subjected to loading is called “block cracking,” which is not a loadassociated distress.) BLOCK CRACKING - Block cracks are interconnected cracks that divide the pavement into approximately rectangular pieces. Block cracking is caused mainly by shrinkage of the asphalt concrete and daily temperature cycling (which results in daily stress/strain cycling). It is not load-associated. Block cracking usually indicates that the asphalt has hardened significantly. Block cracking normally occurs over a large portion of the pavement area, but sometimes will occur only in non-traffic areas. This type of distress differs from alligator cracking in that alligator cracks form smaller, many-sided pieces with sharp angles. Also, unlike block, alligator cracks are caused by repeated traffic loadings, and are therefore found only in traffic areas (i.e., wheel paths).

CRITICAL PCI - The PCI value at which the rate of loss increases with time, or the cost of applying a maintenance treatment increases significantly.

DISTORTIONS (Bumps & Sags)- Bumps are small, localized, upward displacements of the pavement surface. They are different from shoves in that shoves are caused by unstable pavement. Sags are small, abrupt, downward displacements of the pavement surface. If bumps appear in pattern perpendicular to traffic flow and are spaced at less than 3 m (10 ft), the distress is called corrugation. Distortion and displacement that occur A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 2
over large areas of the pavement surface causing large and/or long dips in the pavement should be recorded at “swelling.”
EMULSION - A chemical added to water and asphalt that keeps the asphalt in a stable suspension in the water.

ESAL - The impact of trucks is measured in equivalent single 18,000 pound axle loads (Equivalent Single Axle Load).

FC - Functional Classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of traffic service that they are intended to provide. There are three highway functional classifications: arterial, collector, and local roads. All streets and highways are grouped into one of these classes, depending on the character of the traffic.

Arterials - provide the highest level of service at the greatest speed for the longest uninterrupted distance, with some degree of access control.

Collectors - provide a less highly developed level of service at a lower speed for shorter distances by collecting traffic from local roads and connecting them with arterials.

Residential/Local - consists of all roads not defined as arterials or collectors and primarily provides access to land with little or no through movement. • (Excerpted from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration web site on “Functional Classification”.) LONGITUDINAL / TRANSVERSE CRACKING - Longitudinal cracks are parallel to the pavement’s centerline or laydown direction. Transverse cracks extend across the pavement at approximately right angles to the pavement centerline or direction of laydown. These types of cracks are not usually load-associated.

OVERLAY - The placement of asphaltic concrete mix over an existing asphaltic concrete or portland cement concrete surface.

Light Overlay - would include any overlay of less than 2 inches of asphalt.

Heavy Overlay - is a thicker layer of asphalt and might include such items/operations as, but not limited to fabric, milling/grinding and reconstruction.

A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 3
PATCHING & UTILITY CUTS - A patch is an area of pavement that has been replaced with new material to repair the existing pavement. A patch is considered a defect no matter how well it is performing (a patched area or adjacent area usually does not perform as well as an original pavement section). Generally, some roughness is associated with this distress.

PAVEMENT PRESERVATION - Applying the Right Treatment to the Right Pavement at the Right Time using the Right Materials.

PCC - Portland Cement Concrete
PCI - Pavement Condition Index - A rating scale for the condition of a road segment. 100 represents no defects and recent major rehabilitation.

PMP/ PMS - Pavement Management Program/ Pavement Management System - A program to aid in tracking the condition of roads and a means to help quantify the cost of maintaining the roads in a given area.

POTHOLES - Most often are structurally related distresses and should not be confused with raveling and weathering.

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE - Provides budget dollars for localized pavement repairs such as digouts and crack filling.

R-VALUE - A test to evaluate the base, subbase and subgrades of an area to be used in pavement designing for thickness of asphalt.

RAVELING - Raveling is the dislodging of coarse aggregate particles. Raveling may be caused by insufficient asphalt binder, poor mixture quality, insufficient compaction, segregation, or stripping. In addition, raveling may be caused by certain types of traffic, i.e., tracked vehicles. Softening of the surface and dislodging of the aggregates due to oil spillage are also included under raveling.

REFLECTIVE CRACKING - Cracks that occur in new “thin” overlays that are identical to the cracks that were present in the existing pavement.

RUTTING / SHOVING - A rut is a surface depression in the wheel paths. Pavement uplift may occur along the sides of the rut, but, in many instances, ruts are noticeable only after a rainfall when the paths are filled with water. Rutting stems from a permanent deformation in any of the pavement layers or subgrades, usually caused by consolidated or lateral movement of the materials due to traffic load.

A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 4
Shoving is a permanent, longitudinal displacement of a localized area of the pavement surface caused by traffic loading. When traffic pushes against the pavement, it produces a short, abrupt wave in the pavement surface. This distress normally occurs only in unstable liquid asphalt mix (cutback or emulsion) pavements.

SLURRY SEAL - Includes a graded aggregate along with emulsion and water. Generally squeegeed and generally consists of two layers.

TI - Traffic Index - Cars and light trucks have little impact on the pavement structure.

Larger/Heavier trucks have very significant impacts on the pavement due to the high axle weights. The total EALs is converted into a design Traffic Index (TI). The design TI is the total number of EALs that the pavement will support before it begins to fail, regardless of the passage of time. Normally for a new pavement, the EALs over a 20_year period are used. For rehabilitation procedures such as overlays, 10 years is generally used.

WEATHERING - Weathering is the loss of the fine aggregate from within the pavement matrix. This distress indicates that either the asphalt binder has hardened appreciably or that a poor quality mixture is present.

STREETSAVER® / REPORT DEFINITIONS
% LOAD RELATED - The percentage of the pavement distress in a management section that is load related distress (caused by excessive weight on the pavement surface). % OF ENVIRONMENT - The percentage of the pavement distress in a management section that is an environment related distress.
% OTHER - Is the percentage of the pavement section that is not a load related or environment related distress.

ACTIVE - Indicates whether or not the current record is active.

ACTION / TREATMENT - A proposed type of rehabilitation work that should be used on a given road segment, based on PCI, FC and engineering evaluation.

ANNUAL BUDGET - The amount of money that is available each year to be used for pavement maintenance. These funds can come from various sources and can vary from year to year, although it is generally a fixed figure.

A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 5
AREA - Contains the area of a section in square feet. This is automatically calculated using the values that are entered in the Length and Width fields. However, if the section is irregularly shaped the area can be entered by the user.

AREA ID - Is an optional, jurisdiction defined field to identify the area in which the section is located. For example, each neighborhood or subdivision, or each geographic type (mountain, valley, coast, etc.) in the jurisdiction may be assigned a letter of the alphabet.

BASE BUDGET - Provides an area for you to enter the dollar amount of your base budget.

BASE BUDGET INCREASE FACTOR - Stores the percent that the base budget will increase each year.

BASE PM SPLIT - Percent of the base budget that has been set aside for preventive maintenance.

BEGINNING LOCATION - Identifies the point that defines the beginning of the section.

This is generally the name of a cross road or other landmark.

BRANCH - Generally a road name or a road name with a direction of travel.

CL - Centerline Mile - a measuring of the length of a road regardless of the width of the road.

CONDITION - Column lists the condition levels (2-5) that require stop-gap treatments.

COST/ SQ YD - Indicates the cost per square yard of road for the suggested treatment.

CURRENT PCI - Calculated from either a visual inspection or a maintenance treatment.

DESCRIPTION - Displays a description of the item named in the previous column in a grid.

DISTRESS - Contains the type of distress present on a section of a road.

DISTRESSES - Defects found in asphalt concrete (AC) pavements or portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements. These defects degrade the condition of the road.

DETERIORATION CURVE - This provides a graphical representation of the current pavement condition index and the historical PCIs for each section of road in your jurisdiction.

A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 6
END LOCATION - Identifies the point that defines the end of the section. This is generally the name of a crossroad or other landmark.

EVENTS – This provides for viewing and maintaining of Events or changes that have been made on a management section. The Events that are included are:
• Management Section Creation.
• Results from Maintenance and Rehabilitation treatments that have been applied to the Management Section.
• Results from Visual Inspections of Management Sections. • Listing of changes/edits of information on a Management Section.

EVENT ACTIVE - Indicates whether an Event is currently part of the active history for the current Section.

EVENT PCI - The PCI after the selected Event occurred.

EVENT TRANSACTION TYPE - Includes: Creation, Inspection, Treatment, Split, Combine, Attribute Change and Core Data Change.

EVENT VALID - Indicates if an Event can be activated and made part of the valid events for the current section.

FUNDING SOURCE - Is an optional, jurisdiction defined field to identify the funding source for the section; an example might be G for general fund.

GENERAL CODE - Is an optional, jurisdiction defined field used to identify sections of pavement sharing common characteristics, i.e., drainage type.

INFLATION RATE - Is the inflation used throughout your jurisdiction. You may wish to consult your financial department with this value.

INSPECTION AREA - Is the total area of the inspection unit.

INTEREST RATE - Contains the interest rate used throughout your jurisdiction.

LM - Lane Mile - a measurement of the length of all the lanes for a given FC or area.

LIFE EXTENSION - Is the number of years that a maintenance treatment extends the life of a pavement surface.

M&R, or MnR - An acronym for Maintenance and Rehabilitation, used to refer to treatment data or history in the StreetSaver® program.

A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 7
MAINTENANCE/ REHABILITATION - This is used to review the proposed maintenance, new maintenance, and/ or rehabilitation for any road section in your jurisdiction.

M&R DATE - Displays the date the maintenance/ rehabilitation treatment was completed.

MANAGEMENT SECTION - This is used to maintain an inventory of all the roads and road sections in your jurisdiction.

MANAGEMENT UNIT - Relates a project to a management unit.

MILEPOSTS - Display the beginning and ending points of a management section.

NEW PCI - Stores the PCI value that was calculated after a treatment was applied.

NUMBER OF SURFACE SEALS BEFORE OVERLAY - Displays the recommended number of surface seals before the application of an overlay.

OLD PCI - Displays the pavement condition index before a treatment was applied.

OPTIMUM PCI – The Optimum PCI refers to the highest PCI level the overall network can achieve within the given “Budget Needs” time frame. That level is dependent on the parameters set in the Decision Tree and where the PCI Breakpoints are set. Changes made to the either the timing, or the treatments, within the Decision Tree, or to the value of each of the PCI Breakpoints will directly affect the Optimum PCI.

OTHER - Displays the weighting factor applied to management sections with functional classes other than arterial, collector, and residential.

OVERLAY - Displays the overlay code that corresponds to an overlay procedure.

OVERLAY CODE - Is an identifier for the treatment type; use one of the six codes from the pop-up list that appears when this is activated.

PCI CAP - Stores the maximum PCI value that will be included in needs and scenario calculations. If a PCI value is larger than the PCI Cap value, it will not be included.

PCI EFFECTIVENESS CUT-OFF - Contains the minimum PCI value used in calculating the area under the projected performance curve. That area is used in ranking sections needing work, and the area below the PCI Cut-Off value is not included in that area. It should generally be the lowest PCI value that defines the minimum acceptable condition for all of the pavement types and functional classification groupings.

A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 8
PCI HIGH - LOW > 25 - Is marked if the difference between the high and low PCI values is greater than 25.

PCI HIGH VALUE - Is the maximum PCI value for an inspection unit used in the last PCI calculation for a management unit.

PCI LOW VALUE - Is the minimum PCI value for an inspection unit used in the last PCI calculation for a management unit.

PM% - Scenarios based on a yearly budget, this column stores the percent that has been set aside for preventive maintenance.

RATING - The rating is the weighted cost effectiveness ratio of the recommended treatment. Also referred to as Weighted Effectiveness Ratio (WER) REPLACEMENT COST - Is the cost per square yard to install a new pavement surface.

RESIDENTIAL $ - Indicates the cost of a stop-gap treatment per square yard when applied to a road with a residential functional class and a given condition.

ROAD ID - Contains a two-character identifier that was assigned to the road. The combination of Road Number, Road Name, and Road ID must be unique for each road section.

ROAD NAME - Displays the name of the road that corresponds to the road number and road ID. The combination of Road Number, Road Name, and Road ID must be unique for each road section.

ROAD NUMBER - Contains the number that was assigned to a road. The combination of Road Number, Road Name, and Road ID must be unique for each road section.

SECTION - Usually a branch or road is large and needs to be divided into smaller pieces to maintain. These smaller pieces are labeled as “Sections” or “Segments” and designated with a number and a beginning and ending location.

SECTION ID - Is an identifier that is unique for each section of a given street. Note that the Street ID and the Section ID combined describe the individual section. Therefore, that combination must be unique. The same Section ID can be reused as long as it is used in conjunction with a different Street ID each time.

SEGMENT LENGTH - Is the length in feet of the management section.

A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 9
SELECT MANAGEMENT SECTIONS - Allows you to calculate PCI values based on selected management sections. If this button is marked, the management sections that have had records updated since the last calculations are displayed in a grid. Select the management sections you want included in the calculations from this grid.

SPECIAL - Check box is marked if the displayed inspection unit is non-representative of a section as a whole.

SPECIAL UNIT - The information will either be Y or blank. Y is an indication that this inspection unit is in some way non-representative of the section as a whole, and would receive a different maintenance/rehabilitation treatment from the rest of the section.

STANDARD INSPECTION UNITS - Is the typical number of inspection units that would be used for a particular management section.

STOP-GAP APPLICATION INTERVAL - Indicates the number of years between the applications of stop-gap treatments.

STREET ID - Is an identifier that is unique for each street. The Street ID usually bears some similarity to the actual street name.

STREET NAME - Is the full name of the street including “Street”, “Way”, “Court” etc.

SURFACE TYPE - Describes the type of surface for a specific section of road. The options for this field are:
• A - AC for asphalt concrete,
• C - AC/PCC for asphalt concrete over Portland cement concrete, • O - AC/AC for overlays of asphalt concrete over asphalt concrete, • P - PCC for Portland cement concrete,
• S - ST for surface treatment (This Surface Type is not used very often, as it refers to roads that are neither AC, or PCC, but have a surface treatment over dirt or gravel.)
TREATMENT - Contains the type of treatment the road received or will receive.

TREATMENT COST - Is an optional field giving the cost in dollars and cents of the treatment.

UNIT OF MEASURE - Displays the units of measure used to measure an item.

UNIT PRICE - Displays the price paid for an inventory item.

A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 10
VISUAL PCI - Used to identify PCI calculations that have been determined based upon a visual inspection. If this check box is blank, then the PCI was extrapolated based upon the maintenance treatment that has been applied to a management section.

WEIGHTING FACTORS - Section displays the weighting factors established by your jurisdiction for the functional classes.

YEAR OF MAINTENANCE - Stores the proposed year of a treatment.

YEARS BETWEEN CRACK SEALS - Displays the number of years between the application of crack seals for the functional class with a specific severity.

YEARS BETWEEN SURFACE SEALS - Displays the recommended number of years that should come between surface seal application for the functional class with the indicated severity.

YEARS TO CALCULATE - Stores the number of years you want to include in the Budget Needs calculation. The number of years cannot be less than 5 or more than 20.

ZONES - Geographical areas of the city defined by city staff to aid in the development of a maintenance plan for residential roads.

City of Salinas
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • 200 Lincoln Avenue • Salinas, California 93901 Phone: (831) 758-7241 • www.cityofsalinas.org
Memorandum
To: Steve Carrigan, City Manager
From: Adriana Robles, PE, CFM, City Engineer
Date: July 31, 2023
RE.: Pavement Restoration: Pothole Repair Plan
Pavement Restoration: Pothole Repair Plan
I. Potholes and why do they occur?
Potholes are pavement failures that create depressions in the pavement. Potholes begin through cracks in the pavement. Cracks allow water to seep into the roadway. This water creates pockets in the base and subbase layers of the pavement. As temperatures fluctuate, the water expands and contracts weakening the pavement layers. This allows the stress caused by traffic loads to break apart pavement. During the months of December 2022 and March 2023, the City of Salinas experienced the highest rainfall over the past five years, with a total recorded rainfall of 12.7 inches. This rainfall compounded with low temperatures
1 allowed for more pavement failures and
potholes to occur.

On March 16, 2021, the Salinas City Council was presented the Pavement Management System Update and Pavement Conditions Report. The City of Salinas’ overall average pavement condition index was 55, or poor, based on pavement conditions observed in 2020. The report highlighted deferred maintenance and lack of funding for pavement maintenance.

Given the overall pavement conditions, the unprecedented rainfall, and the low temperatures experienced this winter, the creation and multiplication of potholes was inevitable. To date staff has repaired 12,374 potholes for 2023, compared to 3,912 potholes in 2022 and 5,017 potholes in 2021.

II. Current pavement restoration strategies
Potholes are repaired as part of the maintenance functions of the Streets Maintenance Division of Public Works. Using the Q-Alert system, maintenance staff respond to pothole locations, placing either Granite patch or hot mix asphalt, an industry standard, to repair the pothole. Staffing the Streets Division has been a challenge. Vacancy in the division has led to incomplete crews and the inability to expand work capabilities. Currently, the single crew will divide their workweek schedule between assisting contractors of the 50-50 sidewalk repair program with asphalt patching, pothole repair (Q-Alerts), roadway reconstruction, crack sealing, equipment maintenance, assistance with special events, and assistance to other divisions or emergency responses. Pavement preservation has been the task of Engineering (CIP) Division of Public Works. Preservation has taken the form of slurry sealing, chip sealing and reconstruction.

Pavement Restoration: Pothole Repair Plan
July 2023

Page 2 of 3 ends

Currently, Streets Maintenance has begun reconstruction of some of the lowest rated residential streets. By focusing on residential streets, pavement reconstruction can be more efficient as this requires less traffic control, and the crew can work with fewer disruptions.

Maintenance, rehabilitation, and preservation of pavements is generally funded by SB1, Measure X and gas tax. These funds also fund other functions and programs of the City of Salinas.

III. Pavement Restoration Plan - Resources
In order to develop a pavement restoration plan that will work consistently given the staffing fluctuations, the Public Works department must seek alternative strategies to current division functions. This must begin by focusing the effort of the Streets Maintenance staff to street maintenance.

During FY2022-2023, a total of 28 50-50 sidewalk repair permits were issued. Many of which requiring assistance from the streets crew to patch asphalt following sidewalk, driveway, and curb repairs. A typical asphalt patch (~20-ft) would take the streets crew up to four hours to replace.

As part of a review of the 50-50 sidewalk repair program, patching of the roadway (tie-ins) following repairs should be placed on the contractor conducting the work.

Also in FY2022-2023, the streets crew provided assistance to 26 special events. This assistance at times required multiple days to set up and break down traffic control, signage, or roadway closures. Together the streets crew dedicated approximately 3-4 weeks of work to special events.

In order to relieve the maintenance crew of special events responsibilities, event organizers should be required to provide their own traffic control or funding needs to be appropriately allocated to contract the traffic control of special events to an on-call contractor.

Street maintenance crews also assist in installation of traffic calming measures and street signage installations requested by the Traffic Division.

IV. Pavement Restoration Plan – Funding
Current pavement conditions have allowed for an influx of funding not previously allocated to pavement. $1M to the Streets Division and $3M to the CIP Division were appropriated for pavement from the ARPA funds. Additionally, $7.8M of unspent FY2022-2023 General Funds were appropriated to pavement restoration. This will add to the funds normally appropriated in the CIP budget to the pavement funds (9981 and 9234). Moving forward staff will continue to advocate for additional funding to be dedicated to pavement restoration.

V. Pavement Restoration Plan – Addressing Potholes
As part of this year’s appropriation of unspent FY2022-2023 general funds, each council district will receive ~$1.3M. CIP staff is proposing to maximize the use of these funds by addressing pothole repair. Staff proposes contracting for base repair on the arterials and collectors with the greatest need in each district. In some cases, deviations from this strategy will be made at the request of Councilmembers. Staff will request additional funding in the coming budget year to slurry roadways segments that are receiving base repair as part of the pothole repair.

In the early fall, prior to the start of the rainy season and cooler weather, the streets maintenance crews will dedicate significant effort to crack sealing. A robust and annual survey of all city streets and crack sealing of all cracks would significantly reduce the city’s susceptibility to potholes.

Pavement Restoration: Pothole Repair Plan
July 2023

Page 3 of 3 ends

In the spring, as weather allows, the streets maintenance crew will dedicate their efforts to pothole repair. Again, a robust and systematic effort to survey all city streets and address all potholes would significantly impact the pavement conditions. This may come in a district-by-district effort that may expand multiple weeks.

VI. Pavement Restoration – Reconstruction/Management
Public Works CIP staff is working with Pavement Engineer Inc. on an update of the Pavement Management System which will provide the current Pavement Condition Index and on a policy for addressing pavement management. The policy will incorporate the need for prioritizing roadway maintenance based on data-driven process, funding options for a sustainable program and the need for addressing utility cuts which weaken roadway pavements (a moratorium).

VII. Pavement Management Plan
As illustrated in the 2021 Pavement Management System Update presentation to Council, full replacement of roadway pavements would require a $1.3B appropriation. The cost would be reduced with increasing street crew staffing and funding. As neither the required funding nor the staffing can be secured, staff is proposing the following recommendations.

1. Update the 50-50 Sidewalk Repair Program to require contractors to also perform the required asphalt roadway patch required with sidewalk, curb, or driveway improvements.

2. Modify the Special Events program to require applicants to provide the required traffic control or to reimburse the funding of a traffic control contractor managed by the City.

3. Adjust street maintenance crew schedules to focus maintenance efforts on activities which will better serve the city by focusing on crack sealing in the fall and pothole repair in the spring.

4. Continue pavement reconstruction of residential streets by the Streets Division with assistance by on-call contractors, as allowed by funding.

5. Secure adequate funding annually to provide annual pavement preservation projects (slurry seals and chip seals) of roadways based on the prioritization set by the Pavement Management policy.

6. Secure adequate funding annually to address base repairs and reconstruction of arterials and collectors based on the prioritization set by the Pavement Management policy.

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-277, Version: 1
Minutes
Approve minutes of April 23, 2024.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/3/2024
powered by Legistar™
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
City of Salinas
Meeting Minutes - Unofficial
City Council
Mayor Kimbley Craig
Councilmembers:

Carla Viviana González, District 1 - Tony Barrera, District 2 Steve McShane, District 3 - Orlando Osornio, District 4 Andrew Sandoval, District 5 - Anthony Rocha, District 6 Jim Pia, Interim City Manager
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
City Clerk’s Office: (831) 758-7381
Tuesday, April 23, 2024 4:00 PM SALINAS ROTUNDA

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL
Councilmember Tony Barrera
Councilmember Carla Viviana Gonzalez
Councilmember Steve McShane
Councilmember Orlando Osornio
Councilmember Anthony Rocha
Councilmember Jose Andrew Sandoval
Mayor Kimbley Craig

Present: 7 -

PROCLAMATION
The City Council proclaimed:

Small Business Week, April 28 - May 4, 2024.

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Received public comment from members of the public in attendance and on Zoom.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
ID#24-215 Fiscal Year 24-25 City-Wide Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Annual Update
Received report from Senior Finance Management Analyst Abe Pedroza the City’s fee schedule reviewed and adjusted by each department, as applicable, to ensure fees and charges keep pace with inflation, providing full recovery of City service costs. The updated Schedule of Fees and Charges goes into effect 60 days after City Council adoption and will begin July 1, 2024. FY 2024-25 recommended CPI increase for consideration is 3.7%. Official report filed with the City Clerk.

The following audience members commented on the report:

City of Salinas Page 1
City Council Meeting Minutes - Unofficial April 23, 2024 David Maisonneuve, District 3 Resident
Upon motion by Councilmember Rocha, seconded by Councilmember Gonzalez, Resolution authorizing the adjustments and addition to the City-wide Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Effective July 1, 2024 was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22940
ID#24-214 City Development Impact Fees Annual Adjustment Received report from City Engineer Adriana Robles regarding the adjustment of the City development impact fees by 2.6% effective July 1, 2024. The increase is based on the Engineering News Record (ENR) construction cost index (CCI) increase over the last year, which is consistent with the fee ordinance. Official report filed with the City Clerk.

Upon motion by Councilmember Rocha, seconded by Councilmember Barrera, Resolution increasing the City Development Impact Fees by 2.6% effective July 1, 20242 was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22941
ID#24-216 Sanitary Sewer Development Impact Fee Update
Received report from City Engineer Adriana Robles regarding updating the Sanitary Sewer Development Impact Fee schedule effective July 1, 2024. The Sanitary Sewer Development Impact Fee schedule update modifies the impact fees to align with the adopted Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update and AB 602. Official report filed with the City Clerk.

The following audience member commented on the report:

Unidentified audience member
David Maisonneuve
Upon motion by Councilmember Barrera, seconded by Councilmember Rocha, Resolution updating the Sanitary Sewer Development Impact Fee to align with the adopted Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update and AB 602 was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22941
ID#24-220 2023 AB 481 Annual Report, Renewal of Ordinance No. 2657, and Purchase of AB 481 Equipment
Received report from Acting Chief of Police John Murray regarding Assembly Bill 481 codified in Government Code sections 7070 through 7075 which requires a law enforcement agency to obtain approval from the applicable governing body, by adopting a City of Salinas Page 2
City Council Meeting Minutes - Unofficial April 23, 2024 military equipment use policy by ordinance, prior to taking certain actions related to the funding, acquisition, or use of “military equipment” as defined by the Bill. As required by AB 481, staff presented the 2023 AB 481 Annual Report and requested renewal of Ordinance No. 2657 to allow SPD to continue utilizing this necessary equipment. The department is also requesting the purchase of new AB 481 equipment for the Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Team from LC Action for a total cost not to exceed $10,499.11. Official report filed with the City Clerk.

The following audience members commented on the report:

Eric Petersen
MOTION
Councilmember Barrera moved to approve to renew Ordinance No. 2657 pertaining to military equipment funding, acquisition, and use, and authorize the Interim City Manager to approve the direct purchase of AB 481 equipment for a total cost not to exceed $10,499.11. Motion was second by Councilmember McShane.

Councilmember Rocha requested a friendly amendment to the motion directing staff to work on amending the ordinance language regarding the use of the MRAP at community events without impacting the Department's use of the MRAP for emergencies and preplanned operations as part of the renewal process. Friendly amendment was accepted by the makers of the motion.

Upon motion by Councilmember Barrera, seconded by Councilmember McShane, Resolution pertaining to military equipment funding, acquisition, and use, and authorize the Interim City Manager to approve the direct purchase of AB 481 equipment for a total cost not to exceed $10,499.11; and directing staff to work on amending the ordinance language regarding the use of the MRAP at community events without impacting the Department's use of the MRAP for emergencies and preplanned operations as part of the renewal process was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22943

STUDY SESSION
ID#24-190 General Plan Update/Visión Salinas 2040: Public Safety and Health and Environmental Justice Study Session
Received report from Senior Planner Monica Gurmilan regarding guidance on emerging topics of conversation and priorities of the Public Safety and Health and Environmental Justice Elements being prepared as part of the General Plan update. The Health and Environmental Justice Element is a new state mandate and is meant to establish goals and programs related to understanding and addressing environmental injustices in the community. Public Safety discussion expands on the current, broader, Safety Element, which has now been split into two separate chapters, Environmental Safety and Public Safety. The Public Safety Element also tackles issues pertaining to inequity and seeks to work in conjunction with Health and Environmental Justice Element to create a safer, healthier, thriving Salinas for all. Official report filed with the City Clerk.

The following audience members commented on the report:

Mary Ann Worden
City of Salinas Page 3
City Council Meeting Minutes - Unofficial April 23, 2024 Unidentified audience member
No action required. Report regarding the Public Safety and Health and Environmental Justice element of the General Plan/Vision Salinas 2040 was presented to the City Council.

CONSENT AGENDA
ID#24-231 Minutes
Upon motion by Councilmember Osornio, seconded by Councilmember Sandoval, the minutes of April 9, 2024 were approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -
ID#24-234 Financial Claims
Upon motion by Councilmember Osornio, seconded by Councilmember Sandoval, the financial claims report was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -
ID#24-146 Amendment No. 2 to Master Services Agreement with 2nd Nature LLC Upon motion by Councilmember Osornio, seconded by Councilmember Sandoval, Resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Master Services Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Salinas and 2nd Nature LLC for NPDES permit compliance support, watershed modeling, ArcGIS field applications, and geospatial data management in an amount not to exceed $2.5 million for the duration of the Agreement and extending the term of the Agreement until October 1, 2025 was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22944
ID#24-178 Amendment No. 4 to Agreement for Services with Benitez Security Services, Inc.

Upon motion by Councilmember Osornio, seconded by Councilmember McShane, Resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager or designee to execute Amendment No. 4 to Agreement for Services with Benitez Security Services, Inc. increasing the total not to exceed compensation amount to $1,065,237 and extending the term through June 30, 2024 was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

City of Salinas Page 4
City Council Meeting Minutes - Unofficial April 23, 2024 Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22945
ID#24-192 Annual Maintenance Service Agreement with EnvisionWare, Inc.

Upon motion by Councilmember Osornio, seconded by Councilmember Sandoval, Resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to enter into a service agreement with EnvisioinWare, Inc. for annual maintenance of the Library Automated Self-Checkout System in the amount of $35,732.62 was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22946
ID#24-213 Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Wallace Group Upon motion by Councilmember Osornio, seconded by Councilmember Sandoval, Resolution approving an Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Salinas and Wallace Group for additional scope with revised term and fee schedule for the Wastewater Rate Study for a not-to-exceed amount of $63,090.00.; and approving the transfers totaling $80,000 to CIP 9008 was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22947
ID#24-218 Acceptance of Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Grant Upon motion by Councilmember Barrera, seconded by Councilmember McShane, Resolution authorizing the acceptance of the $75,000 ICAC Grant and authorize the establishment of the ICAC Grant appropriation and corresponding revenue budget was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22948
ID#24-219 Direct Purchase of FSIS-II Color Lab System
Upon motion by Councilmember Osornio, seconded by Councilmember Sandoval, Resolution authorizing the direct purchase of the FSIS-II Color Lab System from Arrowhead Forensics for a total cost not to exceed $87,623.84 was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

City of Salinas Page 5
City Council Meeting Minutes - Unofficial April 23, 2024 Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22949
ID#24-223 Salinas Police and Fire 2024 Fireworks Enforcement Plan The following audience member commented on the report:

Mary Ann Worden
Upon motion by Councilmember Sandoval, seconded by Councilmember McShane, the 2024 Fireworks Enforcement Plan was received and accepted. The motion carried by the following vote:

Mary Ann Worden
Upon motion by Councilmember McShane, seconded by Councilmember Osornio, Resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute Change Order No. 3 and related documents to Premier Builders, Inc. for the City Hall 1st Floor Build Back Project No. 8170 in the amount of $1,259,693; and authorize a $250,000.00 allowance for construction contingencies for future change orders to the City Hall 1st Floor Build Back Project No. 8170; and approve reallocation of American Rescue Plan Act funds (ARPA), in the amount of $800,000.00 to Adaptations to City Hall Project No. 8170 was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha and Mayor Craig 6 -

Absent: 1 - Councilmember Sandoval

Enactment No: RES 22950
ID#24-237 Modification to Classification-Salary Schedule Upon motion by Councilmember Osornio, seconded by Councilmember Sandoval, Resolution modifying the Classification - Salary Schedule to re-title the Environmental Resources Planner classification was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha, Councilmember Sandoval and Mayor Craig
7 -

Enactment No: RES 22951
ID#24-238 Second Amendment to the Agreement with Accountancy Corporation, DBA Maze & Associates for Accounting Services
City of Salinas Page 6
City Council Meeting Minutes - Unofficial April 23, 2024 Upon motion by Councilmember Osornio, seconded by Councilmember Gonzalez, Resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute a Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Accountancy Corporation, dba. Maze and Associates for accounting and financial reporting services to increase the maximum compensation from $75,000 to $200,000 was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember McShane, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha and Mayor Craig 6 -

Absent: 1 - Councilmember Sandoval

Enactment No: RES 22952
ID#24-239 Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Services with Kysmet Security & Patrol, Inc.

This item was tabled indefinitely.

This item was tabled indefinitely.
6:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION
ID#24-212 a. Anticipated Litigation - California Government Code Section 54956.9(e)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding significant exposure to litigation (3 cases). b. Existing Litigation - California Government Code Section 54956.9, conference with legal counsel regarding, Robert Durst vs. City of Salinas, Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Case Number(s): ADJ14890281.

THE CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED IN THE ROTUNDA AT 7:30 P.M.

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
Pursuant to California Government Code section 54957.1, there were no reportable actions on closed session matters.
7:30 P.M. CONSIDERATION
ID#24-232 Salinas City Council District 3 Vacancy
Received report from City Attorney Christopher Callihan regarding the resignation of Councilmember Steve McShane from the City Council efffective May 10, 2024. Salinas Charter section 2.7(a) provides for vacancies in the office of a Councilmember and provides the process for filling any such vacancy. Vacancies may be filled by appointment and or an election. City staff requested direction from the City Council on which option to pursue. Official report filed with the City Clerk.

The following audience members commented on the report:

Bill Freeman, District 3 Resident
Joan Bennett
Joey Martinez, District 3 Resident
Tammy LaSalla, District 3 Resident
City of Salinas Page 7
City Council Meeting Minutes - Unofficial April 23, 2024 Ginger Pierce, District 3 Resident
Adam Pinteres
Frank Savino, District 3 Resident and Business Owner
Joel Panzer, District 3 Resident
Karen Kameron, District 3 Resident
Ren Radley, District 3 Resident
Maureen Wruck, District 3 Resident
Lori Durletti, District 3 Resident
Marsha Peoples, District 3 Resident
Michael Lipe
David Mack, District 3 Resident
David A. Smith, District 3 Resident
Rose Clark, District 3 Resident
Pat Boeingham
Cary Swensen, District 3 Resident, Small Business Owner, Educator Deborah Narvaez, District 3 Resident, Monterey Central Labor Council Victor Carales, Central Labor Council
Unidentified Audience member
Lupe Covarrubias Martinez, District 3 Resident
Dominic Dursa
Amy Salmina, District 3 Business Owner
Peter Szalai, District 5 Resident
Bradley Clinton, District 3 Resident
Mary Ann Worden
Greg
Jose Guerra
Jaqueline Cruz
Sophia Cortez
Rosa Rios, District 1 Resident
Grant Palmer, District 3 Business Owner
Luis Xago Juarez
Victor (Translation by JAV Language Solutions)
Nidia Soto (Translation by JAV Language Solutions)
Olga Reyna
Ricardo Diaz, Jr.

Marieke Desmond, District 3 Resident
MOTION
Councilmember McShane moved to leave the seat vacant and call for a consolidated election to fill the vacant seat with the November 2024 General Election. Motion was second by Councilmember Gonzalez.

SUBSTITUTE MOTION
Councilmember Rocha moved to appoint a resident of District 3 to fill the vacancy through the 2024 General Municipal Election to be held on November 5, 2024. Motion was second by Councilmember Sandoval.

Upon motion by Councilmember Rocha, seconded by Councilmember Sandoval, the City Council directed staff to proceed with the process for appointment of a resident of District 3 to fill the vacancy through the 2024 General Municipal Election and call for a consolidated election to be held on November 5, 2024 to fill the reminder of the term. Substitute motion was approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

City of Salinas Page 8
City Council Meeting Minutes - Unofficial April 23, 2024 Ayes: Councilmember Gonzalez, Councilmember Osornio, Councilmember Rocha and Councilmember Sandoval
4 -
Noes: 3 - Councilmember Barrera, Councilmember McShane and Mayor Craig COUNCILMEMBERS’ REPORTS, APPOINTMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember McShane reported that he attended a Blue Zones meeting on April 22, 2024. He stated that the roads in South Salinas and throughout the city are heavily traveled and require more maintenance and attention. Additionally, he requested staff address the illegal mobile food vendors on Blanco and Davis and throughout the city. In closing, he invited the community to attend a reception in his honor on May 7, 2024 at 2:30 p.m.

Councilmember Rocha reported that he attended the Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce Government Relations Committee, met with local property managers to discuss the rent stabilization and tenant protection. He requested the City Manager and City Attorney schedule a public meeting in the near future to discuss rent stabilization.

Councilmember Rocha reported that he attended Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority, Community Human Services, and Salinas Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency meetings.

Councilmember Gonzalez requested a follow up regarding the crosswalk on Williams Road and Monte Bella as she has received a number of calls regarding pedestrian safety at that intersection. She invited community youth to apply for the paid summer internship opportunity with the City of Salinas and encouraged organizations to apply for the Community Budget Sponsorship.

Councilmember Barrera commended city staff for working together to address and enforce unpermitted street vendors. He reported that he met with residents at Closter Park to discuss rent stabilization. Councilmember Barrera thanked Councilmember McShane for his years of service.

Councilmember Osornio invited the community to attend the YOSAL Viva Salinas event on April 26 at the Taylor Building, the Asian Cultural Experience Fair on April 27, and El Dia del Nino on April 28.

Mayor Craig thanked Bob Eggers for his service on Measure G and appointed Gloria De La Rosa as his successor. She reported that she attended the Community Alliance for Safety and Peace meeting and received a presentation from Rancho Cielo and attended the Hitchcock Road Animal Service meeting as an alternate for Councilmember Gonzalez. She attended a Planned Parenthood luncheon in Monterey for women, children and families for people experiencing transition. Additionally, she reported that she attended the Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce Awards for local businesses and did a PodCast with Natalie Cuevas of Salinas High School. In closing, she commended the Monterey County Police Offices of Association annual awards where Salinas Police Department and Salinas Fire Department staff was recognized.

ADJOURNMENT
At the request of Councilmember Sandoval and Barrera the meeting was adjourned with a moment of silence in memory of Sergio Alejo, Salinas resident and local business owner.

City of Salinas Page 9
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-269, Version: 1
Financial Claims
Approve financial claims report.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/3/2024
powered by Legistar™
Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
474321 04/18/2024 Open Karina Arvizu Vazquez $325.42
474322 04/18/2024 Open Monica Flores-Ponce $325.42
474323 04/18/2024 Open Tony Barrera $818.40
474324 04/18/2024 Open 2NDNATURE, LLC $73,691.93
474325 04/18/2024 Open 72 Hour LLC dba Chevrolet of Watsonville/National $227.68 474326 04/18/2024 Open A.C.E. Promotional Products, Inc $2,207.63 474327 04/18/2024 Open Ace Hardware $56.79
474328 04/18/2024 Open Acme Car Wash (William Pierce Inc) $1,744.93 474329 04/18/2024 Open Alco Water $1,547.65
474330 04/18/2024 Open Alhambra and Sierra Spring DS Waters of America LP $112.31 474331 04/18/2024 Open ALTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. $3,258.45 474332 04/18/2024 Open Amazon.Com $1,371.16
474333 04/18/2024 Open American Supply Company $3,377.07 474334 04/18/2024 Open Asap Alisal Signs And Printing $27.64 474335 04/18/2024 Open Bandit Systems Inc dba Bandit Systems $1,366.48 474336 04/18/2024 Open Bayside Oil II Inc. $455.00
474337 04/18/2024 Open Blankinship & Associates, Inc. $1,125.00 474338 04/18/2024 Open BrightView Landscape Services, Inc $4,327.83 474339 04/18/2024 Open Cadence Team, Inc $29,725.07
474340 04/18/2024 Open Cagwin & Dorward, LLC $1,033.00
474341 04/18/2024 Open California Association For Property and Evidence $50.00 474342 04/18/2024 Open California Towing and Transport $300.00 474343 04/18/2024 Open Calwen Inc dba The Rescue Source $3,290.44 474344 04/18/2024 Open CDW Government LLC $42,416.80
474345 04/18/2024 Open Central Coast Commercial Tire Center Inc $30.00 474346 04/18/2024 Open Charlie D. Zarza $634.00
474347 04/18/2024 Open Cintas $1,708.13
474348 04/18/2024 Open Coalition of Homeless Services Providers $4,129.69 474349 04/18/2024 Open Coast Automotive Warehouse Inc $917.48 474350 04/18/2024 Open Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc $120,853.02 474351 04/18/2024 Open Comcast (Business) $177.45
474352 04/18/2024 Open Condor Security Of America Inc $5,888.29 474353 04/18/2024 Open CorVel Corporation Inc dba CorVel Enterprise Compa $18,054.25 474354 04/18/2024 Open CSG Consultants $64,704.58
474355 04/18/2024 Open Direct TV LLC $64.24
474356 04/18/2024 Open Don Chapin Inc $4,248.14
474357 04/18/2024 Open Don Chapin Inc $487,919.80
474358 04/18/2024 Open Downtown Streets, Inc $60,357.36 474359 04/18/2024 Open East Bay Tire Company $4,653.02
474360 04/18/2024 Open Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. $3,601.25 474361 04/18/2024 Open Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity $6,042.61 474362 04/18/2024 Open Edilcia Perez dba Mami Fit $289.25 General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/16/2024 - To Payment Date: 5/1/2024 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 1 of 8 Wednesday, May 1, 2024 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/16/2024 - To Payment Date: 5/1/2024 474363 04/18/2024 Open Ellison Environmental, Inc dba Fluid Resource Mana $52,651.00 474364 04/18/2024 Open EMC Planning Group Inc $267.73
474365 04/18/2024 Open Environmental Systems, Inc of Northern California $11,340.00 474366 04/18/2024 Open Fastenal Company $742.46
474367 04/18/2024 Open Fed Ex $10.09
474368 04/18/2024 Open First Alarm $806.43
474369 04/18/2024 Open First Alarm Security & Patrol Inc dba An Allied Un $1,824.37 474370 04/18/2024 Open Genuine Parts Company dba NAPA Auto Parts $130.01 474371 04/18/2024 Open Glasswork by Design $2,544.03
474372 04/18/2024 Open Gold Star Motors dba Gold Star Buick GMC $622.69 474373 04/18/2024 Open Granite Rock Co $699.42
474374 04/18/2024 Open Granite Rock Co $16,160.00
474375 04/18/2024 Open Granite Rock Co $13,321.00
474376 04/18/2024 Open Greens Camera Shop $1,213.72
474377 04/18/2024 Open Grimco, Inc $178.09
474378 04/18/2024 Open Hilda Garcia Petty Cash Custodian $115.00 474379 04/18/2024 Open Homer T Hayward Lumber Co dba Hayward Lumber $43.82 474380 04/18/2024 Open Hope Services $5,250.00
474381 04/18/2024 Open Hydro Turf $103.33
474382 04/18/2024 Open Infra-red Analyzers Inc dba IR Analyzers/Vector Ma $8,950.00 474383 04/18/2024 Open Interactive Data, LLC dba IDI $153.00 474384 04/18/2024 Open International Economic Development Council $166.67 474385 04/18/2024 Open Interstate Battery System Inc $589.91 474386 04/18/2024 Open J R Fencing $5,300.00
474387 04/18/2024 Open Jahaira Paola Navarro dba Dance Into Fitness with $1,004.25 474388 04/18/2024 Open Johnson Electronics $360.00
474389 04/18/2024 Open Juan Reyes Davila dba Reyes Jumpers $650.00 474390 04/18/2024 Open Julio Gil dba Central Coast Sign & Design $688.28 474391 04/18/2024 Open Kanco Inc. / Mighty Auto Parts $307.87 474392 04/18/2024 Open Kenneth R Hargis dba Hargis & Associates $10,000.00 474393 04/18/2024 Open Kimball Midwest $1,319.37
474394 04/18/2024 Open Knorr Systems, Inc. $1,074.45
474395 04/18/2024 Open Kurt Ashley dba Secure Solutions $1,547.04 474396 04/18/2024 Open LAZ KARP Associates, LLC $72,741.33 474397 04/18/2024 Open Leticia A Ramirez dba Happymex LLC $590.00 474398 04/18/2024 Open Matthew G Norton Co dba NWB Salinas LLC $122.00 474399 04/18/2024 Open Matthew G Norton Co dba NWB Salinas LLC $162.00 474400 04/18/2024 Open Matthew G Norton Co dba NWB Salinas LLC $302.00 474401 04/18/2024 Open Mauricio Cebada $250.00
474402 04/18/2024 Open Mei Wolf $1,650.47
474403 04/18/2024 Open Mid Minnesota Wire dba GearGrid Corp $6,406.00 474404 04/18/2024 Open Midwest Tape, LLC dba Midwest Tape $20,000.00 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 2 of 8 Wednesday, May 1, 2024 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/16/2024 - To Payment Date: 5/1/2024 474405 04/18/2024 Open Mission Communications, LLC $4,685.29 474406 04/18/2024 Open MJ Communications, Inc $2,453.06 474407 04/18/2024 Open MJF Automotive Partners Inc dba Cal Collision $4,970.84 474408 04/18/2024 Open Monterey County Emergency Communications Dept $930,113.00 474409 04/18/2024 Open MP 21 Soledad Street, L.P. $1,467.00 474410 04/18/2024 Open Municipal Maintenance Equipment dba MME $3,707.30 474411 04/18/2024 Open My Chevrolet $337.28
474412 04/18/2024 Open My Jeep $681.70
474413 04/18/2024 Open Natalie Angulo dba Galaxy Party Supply $850.50 474414 04/18/2024 Open New Image Landscape Company $100.00 474415 04/18/2024 Open O'Reilly Auto Parts $878.56
474416 04/18/2024 Open Office Depot Business Service Division $2,020.87 474417 04/18/2024 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $693.61 474418 04/18/2024 Open Pacific Truck Parts Inc $3,340.06 474419 04/18/2024 Open Pedro C Estrada Dba Estrada Janitorial Service $2,125.00 474420 04/18/2024 Open Poly Parachute, Inc dba Always Under Pressure $924.26 474421 04/18/2024 Open POSM Software LLC $2,500.00
474422 04/18/2024 Open Pryor Learning Solutions Inc dba Fred Pryor Semina $1,196.00 474423 04/18/2024 Open Pure Water $726.06
474424 04/18/2024 Open Quinn Rental Services $3,491.88
474425 04/18/2024 Open Radio Bilingue, Inc $600.00
474426 04/18/2024 Open Rent-A-Fence.com, Inc $216.32
474427 04/18/2024 Open Republic Services, Inc dba Allied Waste Services $7,695.85 474428 04/18/2024 Open Ross Recreation Equipment $83,296.57 474429 04/18/2024 Open Russell Auria Pest Control Services $170.00 474430 04/18/2024 Open Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. $320.00 474431 04/18/2024 Open Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority $361.16 474432 04/18/2024 Open San Lorenzo Lumber $347.83
474433 04/18/2024 Open Sentry Alarm System $14.30
474434 04/18/2024 Open Signa LLC $3,508.41
474435 04/18/2024 Open Smith and Enright Landscaping $115,845.54 474436 04/18/2024 Open Sonetics Corporation dba Firecom $1,010.62 474437 04/18/2024 Open Southern Tire Mart LLC $965.17
474438 04/18/2024 Open Sturdy Oil Company $309.40
474439 04/18/2024 Open Sunstar Media $25.00
474440 04/18/2024 Open T-Mobile USA $500.00
474441 04/18/2024 Open The Beistle Company dba Fire Smart Promotions $826.49 474442 04/18/2024 Open The Ed Jones Company, Incorporated $143.91 474443 04/18/2024 Open The Sherwin-Williams Co $3,109.04 474444 04/18/2024 Open Third Heaven Landscape $493.00
474445 04/18/2024 Open Traffic Logix, Corp. $51,708.04
474446 04/18/2024 Open Traffic Patterns, LLC $8,140.00
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 3 of 8 Wednesday, May 1, 2024 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/16/2024 - To Payment Date: 5/1/2024 474447 04/18/2024 Open Tri County Fire Protection $54.00 474448 04/18/2024 Open U.S. Bank National Association dba U.S. Bank Equip $344.98 474449 04/18/2024 Open U.S. Bank National Association ND $39,029.30 474450 04/18/2024 Open United Site Services $2,448.15
474451 04/18/2024 Open Valley Fabrication Inc $11,115.29 474452 04/18/2024 Open Valley Saw Shop $159.47
474453 04/18/2024 Open Vals Plumbing and Heating Inc $195.30 474454 04/18/2024 Open Veritiv Operating Company Formerly xpedx $317.62 474455 04/18/2024 Open Verizon Wireless $628.45
474456 04/18/2024 Open Verizon Wireless $588.95
474457 04/18/2024 Open W W Grainger Inc $2,332.01
474458 04/18/2024 Open Wallace Group A California Corporation $8,543.75 474459 04/18/2024 Open Walmart c/o Capitol One $31.94
474460 04/18/2024 Open WCAF, LLC dba Watsonville Ford $86.48 474461 04/18/2024 Open WCDJR LLC dba Watsonville Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram $5,104.77 474462 04/18/2024 Open Worldpac $844.42
474463 04/18/2024 Open Athena Eremo Mendoza $91.48
474464 04/18/2024 Open Beatriz Adriana Zarate Camarena $137.96 474465 04/18/2024 Open Bruce Abbott $1,563.00
474466 04/18/2024 Open Carlos Chavarin $163.28
474467 04/18/2024 Open Castellanos Builders, Inc. $288.36 474468 04/18/2024 Open Cemtech Construction, Inc $930.83 474469 04/18/2024 Open Fadi Aridi c/o Coastal Roofing and Waterproofing $176.60 474470 04/18/2024 Open Jaime Barcelos $1,683.92
474471 04/18/2024 Open Janae Martinez c/o Americo Builders $10,000.00 474472 04/18/2024 Open Janae Martinez c/o Americo Builders $1,563.00 474473 04/18/2024 Open Jessica Mitchel c/o Sunrun Installation Services $121.60 474474 04/18/2024 Open Jessica Mitchel c/o Sunrun Installation Services $287.80 474475 04/18/2024 Open Jessica Mitchel c/o Sunrun Installation Services $121.60 474476 04/18/2024 Open Jessica Mitchel c/o Sunrun Installation Services $121.60 474477 04/18/2024 Open Jessica Mitchel c/o Sunrun Installation Services $121.60 474478 04/18/2024 Open Jimmy Enriquez $2,001.25
474479 04/18/2024 Open Jonathon Strnad c/o Flor Cultivation Company $1,563.00 474480 04/18/2024 Open Julio Gil c/o Central Coast Sign & Design $186.00 474481 04/18/2024 Open Maria Carmen Cardoso $176.60
474482 04/18/2024 Open Matt Gourley $1,563.00
474483 04/18/2024 Open Rose Radovan c/o Sunrun Installation Services $121.60 474484 04/18/2024 Open Samantha Aguilar c/o Sunrun $165.10 474485 04/18/2024 Open Samantha Aguilar c/o Sunrun $248.75 474486 04/18/2024 Open Samantha Aguilar c/o Sunrun Installation Services $121.60 474487 04/18/2024 Open Samantha Aguilar c/o Sunrun Installation Services $121.60 474488 04/18/2024 Open Samantha Aguilar c/o Sunrun Installation Services $287.80 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 4 of 8 Wednesday, May 1, 2024 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/16/2024 - To Payment Date: 5/1/2024 474489 04/18/2024 Open Samantha Aguilar c/o Sunrun Installation Services $121.60 474490 04/18/2024 Open Sarah Alexander c/o Tesla Energy Operations Inc $287.80 474491 04/18/2024 Open Shamara Van Der Voort c/o Santa Cruz Co Bank $1,563.00 474492 04/18/2024 Open Shane Gallaher c/o Americo Buildings LLC $84.78 474493 04/18/2024 Open Shawn Southerland c/o Backflow Prevention Speciali $159.24 474494 04/18/2024 Open Shawn Southerland c/o Backflow Prevention Speciali $159.24 474495 04/18/2024 Open Stacy Radich c/o Church Brothers $261.39 474496 04/18/2024 Open Susan Petersen c/o Myers Electric Company INC $231.00 474497 04/18/2024 Open Titan Solar $287.80
474498 04/18/2024 Open Westridge Parkway Self Storage LLC $1,563.00 474499 04/18/2024 Open Xavier McKee $297.60
474500 04/22/2024 Open Alco Water $7,998.30
474501 04/22/2024 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $170,091.21 474502 04/25/2024 Open Alexis Mejia $198.52
474503 04/25/2024 Open Angel Gonzalez $67.00
474504 04/25/2024 Open Bryan McKinley $67.00
474505 04/25/2024 Open James McGann $98.00
474506 04/25/2024 Open Jason Gates $67.00
474507 04/25/2024 Open Michael Batchelor $85.00
474508 04/25/2024 Open Patricia Penaloza $159.73
474509 04/25/2024 Open 2NDNATURE, LLC $7,768.50
474510 04/25/2024 Open Adonis Diaz $171.50
474511 04/25/2024 Open Agile Occupational Medicine PC $2,069.00 474512 04/25/2024 Open Alhambra and Sierra Spring DS Waters of America LP $259.80 474513 04/25/2024 Open Alhambra and Sierra Spring DS Waters of America LP $317.26 474514 04/25/2024 Open Alisal Union School District $792,000.00 474515 04/25/2024 Open All Pets Hospital $757.03
474516 04/25/2024 Open All Safe Security Alarm $105.00
474517 04/25/2024 Open Amazon.Com $3,304.68
474518 04/25/2024 Open American Traffic Solutions Inc. $38,043.43 474519 04/25/2024 Open Angel Armor, LLC $6,790.05
474520 04/25/2024 Open Asap Alisal Signs And Printing $13.82 474521 04/25/2024 Open AT&T Mobility $21.99
474522 04/25/2024 Open AT&T Mobility $120.89
474523 04/25/2024 Open AutoZone West Inc $29.49
474524 04/25/2024 Open Axon Enterprise, Inc. $79,274.70 474525 04/25/2024 Open Bizon Group Inc dba Conexwest $6,390.29 474526 04/25/2024 Open CACEO $1,220.00
474527 04/25/2024 Open California Water Service $773.97 474528 04/25/2024 Open Canon Financial Services Inc $2,038.29 474529 04/25/2024 Open Canon Solutions America Inc $427.99 474530 04/25/2024 Open Carollo Engineers, Inc $20,733.00 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 5 of 8 Wednesday, May 1, 2024 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/16/2024 - To Payment Date: 5/1/2024 474531 04/25/2024 Open Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Monterey $12,528.57 474532 04/25/2024 Open CDW Government LLC $180.13
474533 04/25/2024 Open Cintas $1,292.85
474534 04/25/2024 Open Coast Automotive Warehouse Inc $515.78 474535 04/25/2024 Open Comcast (Business) $571.44
474536 04/25/2024 Open Comcast (Business) $53.91
474537 04/25/2024 Open Comcast (Business) $620.73
474538 04/25/2024 Open Community Homeless Solutions $5,330.35 474539 04/25/2024 Open CPS HR Consulting $572.00
474540 04/25/2024 Open Craftwater Engineering, Inc $39,352.30 474541 04/25/2024 Open CSC Of Salinas $11.26
474542 04/25/2024 Open Dataflow Business Systems Inc $219.87 474543 04/25/2024 Open Dell Marketing LP $312.76
474544 04/25/2024 Open Division Of The State Architect $622.00 474545 04/25/2024 Open Downtown Streets, Inc $97,896.67 474546 04/25/2024 Open Ecology Action of Santa Cruz $71,661.31 474547 04/25/2024 Open Fed Ex $241.06
474548 04/25/2024 Open First Alarm $418.78
474549 04/25/2024 Open Genuine Parts Company dba NAPA Auto Parts $193.61 474550 04/25/2024 Open Glasswork by Design $4,265.05
474551 04/25/2024 Open Gold Star Motors dba Gold Star Buick GMC $175.00 474552 04/25/2024 Open Goldfarb and Lipman $2,341.00
474553 04/25/2024 Open Granite Rock Co $2,853.16
474554 04/25/2024 Open Greens Camera Shop $5,582.36
474555 04/25/2024 Open Griffin Structures, Inc $17,551.20 474556 04/25/2024 Open Harris and Associates $45,189.77 474557 04/25/2024 Open HD Supply White Cap Construction Supply $536.52 474558 04/25/2024 Open Heather A Hardee dba Hardee Polygraph Services $2,100.00 474559 04/25/2024 Open Hemi's Landscaping and Concrete Inc $5,000.00 474560 04/25/2024 Open HROD, Inc $3,500.00
474561 04/25/2024 Open Ichelle Herrera $320.00
474562 04/25/2024 Open Ingram Book Company $17,632.98
474563 04/25/2024 Open International Association for Property and Evidenc $65.00 474564 04/25/2024 Open Interstate Battery System Inc $212.38 474565 04/25/2024 Open Irby Corporation dba Central Equipment Service $1,431.57 474566 04/25/2024 Open J.J. Keller and Associates Inc $825.50 474567 04/25/2024 Open Jesse And Evan Inc dba La Plaza Bakery $227.07 474568 04/25/2024 Open Johnson Associates $93.85
474569 04/25/2024 Open Jose Luis Corral dba Salinas Pizza $597.82 474570 04/25/2024 Open Knorr Systems, Inc. $1,330.00
474571 04/25/2024 Open Kurt Ashley dba Secure Solutions $2,386.60 474572 04/25/2024 Open L.C. Action $1,911.88
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 6 of 8 Wednesday, May 1, 2024 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/16/2024 - To Payment Date: 5/1/2024 474573 04/25/2024 Open Lawson Products, Inc $1,146.22
474574 04/25/2024 Open League Of California Cities $38,731.00 474575 04/25/2024 Open Leon De Asis $2,000.00
474576 04/25/2024 Open Leslie Hernandez Petty Cash Custodian $397.31 474577 04/25/2024 Open LexisNexis Risk Data Management Inc Accurint Acct $275.05 474578 04/25/2024 Open Mandego Apparel $381.28
474579 04/25/2024 Open Martin's Irrigation Supply, Inc $7,176.79 474580 04/25/2024 Open Matthew G Norton Co dba NWB Salinas LLC $302.00 474581 04/25/2024 Open Medics For Life Inc $160.00
474582 04/25/2024 Open Monterey County Convention And Visitors Bureau $59,904.90 474583 04/25/2024 Open Monterey County The Herald $1,678.69 474584 04/25/2024 Open Motorola Solutions, Inc $486.71
474585 04/25/2024 Open MP Express $936.19
474586 04/25/2024 Open Office Depot Business Service Division $482.36 474587 04/25/2024 Open One Workplace L Ferrari, LLC dba Peninsula Busines $20,287.70 474588 04/25/2024 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $3,590.15 474589 04/25/2024 Open Pacific Truck Parts Inc $236.09
474590 04/25/2024 Open Pape Machinery, Inc. $432.38
474591 04/25/2024 Open PARS Retirement Services $579.32 474592 04/25/2024 Open Partners For Peace $15,585.71
474593 04/25/2024 Open Preferred Alliance Inc. $105.00
474594 04/25/2024 Open Premier Builders, Inc. $48,513.55 474595 04/25/2024 Open Quinn Company $307.17
474596 04/25/2024 Open Rancho Cielo Youth Center $69,949.53 474597 04/25/2024 Open RDO Equipment Company $161.34
474598 04/25/2024 Open Republic Services of Salinas $1,558.33 474599 04/25/2024 Open Reynold R Ramirez dba 3R Electric $981.25 474600 04/25/2024 Open Russell Auria Pest Control Services $175.00 474601 04/25/2024 Open San Diego Police Equipment Company $11,885.27 474602 04/25/2024 Open San Lorenzo Lumber $486.39
474603 04/25/2024 Open Saul Ramirez Morales Authorized Matco Tools Dist. $133.04 474604 04/25/2024 Open Sentry Alarm System $483.44
474605 04/25/2024 Open Serological Research Institute $2,900.00 474606 04/25/2024 Open Shawn Miguel Russell dba Russell Investigations $5,858.19 474607 04/25/2024 Open Shepard AV LLC dba McCune Audio Visual Lighting $1,512.00 474608 04/25/2024 Open SHI International Corp $28,356.00 474609 04/25/2024 Open Simplot AB Retail Sub Inc $15,000.00 474610 04/25/2024 Open Smith and Enright Landscaping $16,424.00 474611 04/25/2024 Open State Water Resource Control Board $1,818.00 474612 04/25/2024 Open Stommel Inc dba Lehr $1,005.60
474613 04/25/2024 Open Sturdy Oil Company $42,762.77
474614 04/25/2024 Open Sun Badge Company $160.40
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 7 of 8 Wednesday, May 1, 2024 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/16/2024 - To Payment Date: 5/1/2024 474615 04/25/2024 Open Super Seer Corporation $2,533.80 474616 04/25/2024 Open Sylvia Marie Ayala $200.00
474617 04/25/2024 Open The Sherwin-Williams Co $958.00
474618 04/25/2024 Open Tri County Fire Protection $237.25 474619 04/25/2024 Open TVG-MGT Holdings, LP dba MGT of America Consulting $6,000.00 474620 04/25/2024 Open U.S. Bank National Association ND $2,784.68 474621 04/25/2024 Open United Parcel Service $48.09
474622 04/25/2024 Open University Corporation at Monterey Bay $2,539.89 474623 04/25/2024 Open Valley Center Bowl $883.45
474624 04/25/2024 Open Valley Saw Shop $2,034.49
474625 04/25/2024 Open Vals Plumbing and Heating Inc $1,744.00 474626 04/25/2024 Open Verizon Wireless $659.92
474627 04/25/2024 Open Verizon Wireless $631.33
474628 04/25/2024 Open W W Grainger Inc $852.42
474629 04/25/2024 Open W&M Marketing Group Inc dba B-Impressed Branding $773.87 474630 04/25/2024 Open Wallace Group A California Corporation $4,761.25 474631 04/25/2024 Open Walmart c/o Capitol One $161.69
474632 04/25/2024 Open WCAF, LLC dba Watsonville Ford $538.57 474633 04/25/2024 Open Willdan Financial Services $14,675.00 474634 04/25/2024 Open Witmer Associates Inc $2,697.44
474635 04/25/2024 Open Worldpac $429.94
474636 04/25/2024 Open YourMembership.com.Inc. $1,348.00 474637 04/25/2024 Open Yeti Cooling Inc $633.00
474638 04/26/2024 Open Diede Construction, Inc $209,627.00 Type Check Totals: $4,700,697.40
General Account - General Account Totals
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 8 of 8 Wednesday, May 1, 2024 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-154, Version: 1
Professional Services Agreement with MNS Engineers, Inc. for Construction Management Services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 1, CIP No. 9510 Approve a Resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to negotiate and execute a Professional Services Agreement with MNS Engineers, Inc. for construction management services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 1, CIP No. 9510 in an amount not to exceed $1,829,248.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/3/2024
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 7, 2024
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PE, LS, DIRECTOR
BY: JOSIE LANTACA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER
TITLE: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SALINAS AND MNS ENGINEERS, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE BORONDA ROAD
CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT PHASE 1 (CIP 9510)
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to negotiate and execute a Professional Services Agreement with MNS Engineers, Inc. for construction management services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 1 (CIP 9510) in an amount not to exceed $1,829,248.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project proposes to widen East Boronda Road into a fourlane roadway (two-lanes at each direction) between Dartmouth Way and Independence Boulevard, and to construct roundabouts at McKinnon Street, El Dorado Drive, Natividad Road, and Independence Boulevard. The project will be built in phases to accommodate funding availability.

Phase 1 will build the McKinnon Roundabout with the associated improvements from east of Dartmouth Way to a point between McKinnon Street and El Dorado Drive.

A request for qualifications (RFQ) to provide construction management services for the Phase 1 project was advertised, and a submittal from MNS Engineers, Inc. was received in response to the RFQ. Staff recommends approving a Professional Services Agreement with MNS Engineers, Inc. for construction management services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 1 for a total amount not to exceed $1,829,248.

BACKGROUND:

The Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project (Project) proposes to widen East Boronda Road into a four-lane roadway (two-lanes at each direction) between Dartmouth Way and Independence Boulevard, and to construct roundabouts at McKinnon Street, El Dorado Drive, Natividad Road, and Independence Boulevard. In May 2017, City Council approved the roundabout concept at the intersections identified above along with Hemingway Drive through Resolution 21169.

Page | 2
The Project is planned to be built in phases to accommodate funding availability. Phase 1 will build the McKinnon Roundabout and associated improvements from east of Dartmouth Way to a point between McKinnon Street and El Dorado Drive
Phase 1 will include the following improvements:

1. Widen East Boronda Road from east of Dartmouth Way to east of El Dorado Dr from two lanes to four lanes;

2. Construct a multilane roundabout at McKinnon Street;

3. Relocate the existing agricultural ditches along the north side of East Boronda Road north of the improvements;

4. Construct stormwater treatment facilities and bioretention facilities to mitigate runoff from the improvements;

5. Construct buffered bike lanes;

6. Construct shared‐use paths at the roundabout;

7. Install a flashing beacon system or other approved pedestrian activated beacon at the pedestrian crossing;

8. Construct bus pullouts, street lighting, sidewalks, ADA-compliant pedestrian curb ramps at all crosswalks; and install storm drain lines, sanitary sewer mainline and extensions, and pavement delineation and street signs, and landscaping.

Phase 1 project is currently being advertised for bidding and will be presented to the City Council for award of contract next month, contingent on a successful bidding process.

A request for qualifications (RFQ) to provide construction management services for the Phase 1 project was advertised in March 2024, and a submittal from MNS Engineers, Inc. was received in response to the RFQ. No other submittals were received.

MNS Engineers shall be responsible for construction management, technical inspections, labor compliance, environmental and biological monitoring services, materials and field-testing services and public outreach. MNS Engineers is partnering with Pacific Crest Engineering (Watsonville), Ingram Group (Pacific Grove), 360PSM (Salinas), G7ei Inc. (Royal Oaks) and Denise Duffy & Associates (Monterey) to provide the required services. Three of these firms are Smal Business Enterprises (SBE) and two firms are Women or Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (WBE or DBE).

MNS Engineers, Inc. recently provided construction management services for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Project and has provided services for other City projects. MNS is well qualified and has the expertise required to provide the services contemplated for the project.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a Page | 3
significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The project addresses the City Council’s Strategic Goals of Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, and Economic Development.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Public Works department will management the consultant’s contract with assistance from Finance department to administer payments.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

This action has no anticipated impact on the General Fund. Sufficient funds have been allocated for CIP 9510 in 5800.50.9510. MNS Engineers’ fees will be paid based on the hourly rates/fee schedule for a total amount not to exceed $1,829,248.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
MNS Agreement

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ____________ (N.C.S)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SALINAS AND MNS ENGINEERS, INC. FOR

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE BORONDA ROAD
CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT PHASE 1 (CIP 9510)
WHEREAS, the Public Works department has identified the need to utilize construction management services to assist the department during the construction phase of the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 1 Project; and
WHEREAS, in March 2024, the City of Salinas engaged in a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process to identify firms with the requisite qualifications to provide construction management services, technical inspection, materials and field-testing services, labor compliance, environmental and biological monitoring services, and public outreach; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2024, Public Works staff received a statement of qualifications from MNS Engineers, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, MNS Engineers, Inc. will be partnering with Pacific Crest Engineering, Ingram Group, 360PSM, G7ei, Inc, and Denise Duffy & Associates to provide the full scope of services; and
WHEREAS, MNS Engineers, Inc. is well qualified and have the expertise to provide the construction management services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Salinas and MNS Engineers, Inc. for construction management services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 1 Project for a total amount not to exceed $1,829,248; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Interim City Manager is hereby authorized and directed, for and on behalf of the City of Salinas, and as its act and deed, to execute the attached Professional Services Agreement; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Interim City Manager is authorized to execute extensions and/or modifications to the Agreement and to take any additional action that may be necessary to effectuate the intent of this resolution.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of May 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 2 of 2 ends

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
_________________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 1 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024

AGREEMENT

FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BETWEEN

THE CITY OF SALINAS AND MNS
ENGINEERS, INC.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 2 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024
Contents
RECITALS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 TERMS ........................................................................................................................................... 4

1. Scope of Service. ................................................................................................................. 4

2. Term; Completion Schedule. ............................................................................................... 4

3. Compensation. ..................................................................................................................... 4

4. Billing. ................................................................................................................................. 4

5. Meet & Confer. .................................................................................................................... 5

6. Additional Copies................................................................................................................. 5

7. Responsibility of Consultant. ............................................................................................... 5

8. Responsibility of City. ......................................................................................................... 5

9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. .................................................................................... 6

10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. ................................................................................... 6

11. Insurance. ............................................................................................................................. 6

12. Access to Records. ............................................................................................................... 6

13. Non-Assignability. ............................................................................................................... 6

14. Changes to Scope of Work. ................................................................................................. 6

15. Ownership of Documents. ................................................................................................... 7

16. Termination. ......................................................................................................................... 7

17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. ................................................................ 8

18. Exhibits Incorporated. .......................................................................................................... 8

19. Independent Contractor. ....................................................................................................... 8

20. Integration and Entire Agreement. ....................................................................................... 8

21. Jurisdiction and Venue. ........................................................................................................ 8

22. Severability .......................................................................................................................... 8

23. Notices. ................................................................................................................................ 8

24. Nondiscrimination................................................................................................................ 9

25. Conflict of Interest. .............................................................................................................. 9

26. Headings. ........................................................................................................................... 10

27. Attorneys’ Fees .................................................................................................................. 10

28. Non-Exclusive Agreement. ................................................................................................ 10

29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement. ........................................................................ 10

30. Licenses.............................................................................................................................. 10

31. Counterparts. ...................................................................................................................... 10

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 3 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024

32. Legal Representation. ........................................................................................................ 10

33. Joint Representation. .......................................................................................................... 10

34. Warranty of Authority........................................................................................................ 11

35. No Waiver of Rights. ......................................................................................................... 11 Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements .............................................................................................. 12 Exhibit B- Scope of Service .......................................................................................................... 15

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 4 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND MNS ENGINEERS, INC.

This Agreement for Professional Services (the “Agreement” and/or “Contract”) is made and entered into this 7th day of May, 2024, between the City of Salinas, a California Charter city and municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”), and MNS ENGINEERS, INC., a California corporation (hereinafter “Consultant”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that he, she, or it is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Consultant is willing to render such professional services, as hereinafter defined, on the following terms and conditions.

NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant agree as follows:

TERMS

1. Scope of Service. The project contemplated and the scope of Consultant’s services are described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

2. Term; Completion Schedule. This Agreement shall commence on May 7, 2024, and shall terminate on May 7, 2027, unless extended in writing by either party upon (30) days written notice. This Agreement may be extended only upon mutual written consent of the parties, and may be terminated only pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

3. Compensation. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant for services rendered the City pursuant to this Agreement on a time and materials basis according to the rates of compensation as set forth in Exhibit B. The total amount of compensation to be paid under this Agreement shall not exceed $1,829,248.

4. Billing. Consultant shall submit to City an itemized invoice, prepared in a form satisfactory to City, describing its services and costs for the period covered by the invoice.

Except as specifically authorized by City, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one person. Consultant’s bills shall include the following information to which such services cost or pertain:
(A) A brief description of services performed;
(B) The date the services were performed;
(C) The number of hours spent and by whom;
(D) A brief description of any costs incurred; and
(E) The Consultant’s signature.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 5 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024
Any such invoices shall be in full accord with any and all applicable provisions of this Agreement.

City shall make payment on each such invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt; provided, however, that if Consultant submits an invoice which is incorrect, incomplete, or not in accord with the provisions of this Agreement, City shall not be obligated to process any payment to Consultant until thirty (30) days after a correct and complying invoice has been submitted by Consultant. The City shall process undisputed portion immediately.

5. Meet & Confer. Consultant agrees to meet and confer with City or its agents or employees with regard to services as set forth herein as may be required by the City to ensure timely and adequate performance of the Agreement.

6. Additional Copies. If City requires additional copies of reports, or any other material which Consultant is required to furnish as part of the services under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide such additional copies as are requested, and City shall compensate Consultant for the actual costs related to the production of such copies by Consultant.

7. Responsibility of Consultant. By executing this Agreement, Consultant agrees that the services to be provided and work to be performed under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the Standard of Care defined below. By executing this Agreement, Consultant further agrees and represents to City that the Consultant possesses, or shall arrange to secure from others, all of the necessary professional capabilities, experience, resources, and facilities necessary to provide the City the services contemplated under this Agreement and that City relies upon the professional skills of Consultant to do and perform Consultant’s work. Consultant further agrees and represents that Consultant shall follow the current, generally accepted practices in this area to the profession to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding the projects for which the services are rendered under this Agreement. (the Standard of Care).

8. Responsibility of City. To the extent appropriate to the projects to be completed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, City shall:
(A) Assist Consultant by placing at its disposal all available information pertinent to the projects, including but not limited to, previous reports and any other data relative to the projects. Nothing contained herein shall obligate City to incur any expense in connection with completion of studies or acquisition of information not otherwise in the possession of City. (B) Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals, and other documents presented by Consultant, and render verbally or in writing as may be appropriate, decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of Consultant.
(C) Steve Carrigan, City Manager, or his designee, shall act as City’s representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. Such person shall have the

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 6 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024
complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements, and systems pertinent to Consultant’s services. City may unilaterally change its representative upon notice to the Consultant.
(D) Give prompt written notice to Consultant whenever City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in a project.

9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. Acceptance by the City of the work to be performed under this Agreement does not operate as a release of Consultant from professional responsibility for the work performed.

10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless.

Consultant shall hold harmless, defend, and indemnify City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorney fees arising out of the performance of the work described herein, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Consultant, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, except where caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City.

11. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance meeting the requirements specified in Exhibit A hereto.

12. Access to Records. Consultant shall maintain all preparatory books, records, documents, accounting ledgers, and similar materials including but not limited to calculation and survey notes relating to work performed for the City under this Agreement on file for at least three (3) years following the date of final payment to Consultant by City. Any duly authorized representative(s) of City shall have access to such records for the purpose of inspection, audit, and copying at reasonable times during Consultant’s usual and customary business hours.

Consultant shall provide proper facilities to City’s representative(s) for such access and inspection.

13. Non-Assignability. It is recognized by the parties hereto that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. This Agreement is personal to Consultant and shall not be assigned by it without express written approval of the City.

14. Changes to Scope of Work. City may at any time, and upon a minimum of ten (10) days written notice, seek to modify the scope of services to be provided for any project to be completed under this Agreement. Consultant shall, upon receipt of said notice, determine the impact on both time and compensation of such change in scope and notify City in writing. Upon agreement between City and Consultant as to the extent of said impacts to time and compensation, an amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared describing such changes.

Execution of the amendment by City and Consultant shall constitute the Consultant’s notice to proceed with the changed scope.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 7 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024

15. Ownership of Documents. Title to all final documents, including drawings, specifications, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software (if purchased on the City’s behalf), video and audio tapes, software output, and any other materials with respect to work performed under this Agreement shall vest with City at such time as City has compensated Consultant, as provided herein, for the services rendered by Consultant in connection with which they were prepared. City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant against all damages, claims, lawsuits, and losses of any kind including defense costs arising out of any use of said documents, drawings, and/or specifications on any other project without written authorization of the Consultant.

16. Termination.
(A) City shall have the authority to terminate this Agreement, upon ten days written notice to Consultant, as follows:
(1) If in the City’s opinion the conduct of the Consultant is such that the interest of the City may be reasonably impaired or prejudiced, or (2) For any reason whatsoever.
(B) Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to payment of such amount as fairly compensates Consultant for all work satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination based upon the Consultant’s rates shown in Exhibit B and/or Section 3 of this Agreement, except that:
(1) In the event of termination by the City for Consultant’s default, City shall deduct from the amount due Consultant the total amount of additional expenses incurred by City as a result of such default. Such deduction from amounts due Consultant are made to compensate City for its actual additional costs incurred in securing satisfactory performance of the terms of this Agreement, including but not limited to, costs of engaging another consultant(s) for such purposes. In the event that such additional expenses shall exceed amounts otherwise due and payable to Consultant hereunder, Consultant shall pay City the full amount of such expense. (C) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, Consultant shall:
(1) Upon receipt of written notice of such termination promptly cease all services on this project, unless otherwise directed by City; and (2) Deliver to City all documents, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software output, video and audio tapes, and any other materials provided to Consultant or prepared by or for Consultant or the City in connection with this Agreement. Such material is to be delivered to City in completed form; however, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 15 herein, City may condition payment for

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 8 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024
services rendered to the date of termination upon Consultant’s delivery to the City of such material.
(D) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, City is hereby expressly permitted to assume the projects and complete them by any means, including but not limited to, an agreement with another party.
(E) The rights and remedy of the City and Consultant provided under this Section are not exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or appearing in any other section of this Agreement.
(F) City may elect to provide a cure period to avoid termination in any of the above cases.

17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. Services performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance and full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and City laws and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder.

18. Exhibits Incorporated. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement and attached to it are hereby incorporated in it by this reference. In the event there is a conflict between any of the terms of this Agreement and any of the terms of any exhibit to the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall control the respective duties and liabilities of the parties.

19. Independent Contractor. It is expressly understood and agreed by both parties that Consultant, while engaged in carrying out and complying with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Consultant expressly warrants not to represent, at any time or in any manner, that Consultant is an employee or servant of the City.

20. Integration and Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters contained herein. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except by amendment in writing signed by both parties.

21. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, County of Monterey, and City of Salinas.

Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in the State of California, in the County of Monterey or in the appropriate federal court with jurisdiction over the matter.

22. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with said laws, but the remainder of the Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect.

23. Notices.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 9 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024
(A) Written notices to the City hereunder shall, until further notice by City, be addressed to:

City Manager
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
With a copy to:

City Attorney
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
(B) Written notices to the Consultant shall, until further notice by the Consultant, be addressed to:

Greg Chelini, PE, Vice President
MNS Engineers, Inc.
201 N. Calle Cesar Chavez, Suite 300
Santa Barbara, CA 93103
[email protected]
805.896.9474
(C) The execution of any such notices by the City Manager shall be effective as to Consultant as if it were by resolution or order of the City Council, and Consultant shall not question the authority of the City Manager to execute any such notice. (D) All such notices shall either be delivered personally to the other party’s designee named above, or shall be deposited in the United States Mail, properly addressed as aforesaid, postage fully prepaid, and shall be effective the day following such deposit in the mail.

24. Nondiscrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, ancestry, creed, sex, national origin, familial status, sexual orientation, age (over 40 years) or disability. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, ancestry, creed, sex, national origin, familial status, sexual orientation, age (over 40 years) or disability.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 10 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024
of this Agreement, no subcontractor or person having such an interest shall be employed. In the event that any conflict of interest should nevertheless hereinafter arise, Consultant shall promptly notify City of the existence of such conflict of interest so that City may determine whether to terminate this Agreement. Consultant further warrants its compliance with the Political Reform Act (Government Code section 81000 et seq.) and Salinas City Code Chapter 2A that apply to Consultant as the result of Consultant’s performance of the work or services pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

26. Headings. The section headings appearing herein shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify, or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions of this Agreement.

27. Attorneys’ Fees. In case suit shall be brought to interpret or to enforce this Agreement, or because of the breach of any other covenant or provision herein contained, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to such costs as may be allowed by the Court. City’s attorneys’ fees, if awarded, shall be calculated at the market rate.

28. Non-Exclusive Agreement. This Agreement is non-exclusive and both City and Consultant expressly reserves the right to contract with other entities for the same or similar services.

29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, the parties do not intend to create any obligations express or implied other than those set out herein; further, this Agreement shall not create any rights in any party not a signatory hereto.

30. Licenses. If a license of any kind, which term is intended to include evidence of registration, is required of Consultant, its representatives, agents or subcontractors by federal, state or local law, Consultant warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good standing, and that any applicable bond posted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

31. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single agreement.

32. Legal Representation. Each party affirms that it has been represented, if it so chose, by legal counsel of its own choosing regarding the preparation and the negotiation of this Agreement and the matters and claims set forth herein, and that each of them has read this Agreement and is fully aware of its contents and its legal effect. Neither party is relying on any statement of the other party outside the terms set forth in this Agreement as an inducement to enter into this Agreement.

33. Joint Representation. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any party. No presumptions or rules of interpretation based upon the identity of the party preparing or drafting the Agreement, or any part thereof, shall be applicable or invoked.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 11 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024

34. Warranty of Authority. Each party represents and warrants that it has the right, power, and authority to enter into this Agreement. Each party further represents and warrants that it has given any and all notices, and obtained any and all consents, powers, and authorities, necessary to permit it, and the persons entering into this Agreement for it, to enter into this Agreement.

35. No Waiver of Rights. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. The failure to provide notice of any breach of this Agreement or failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver thereof.

Failure on the part of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of such provision or any other provision. A waiver by the City of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be construed as waiver(s) of any other condition of performance under this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the date first written above.

CITY OF SALINAS
____________________________
Jim Pia
Interim City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
□ Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney, or
□ Rhonda Combs, Assistant City Attorney

CONSULTANT

_____________________________________
By: Greg Chelini, PE
Its: Vice President

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 12 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024
Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements
Insurance Requirements
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. With respect to General Liability and Professional Liability, coverage should be maintained for a minimum of five (5) years after Agreement completion.

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(A)Commercial General Liability (“CGL”): Insurance Services Office Form (“ISO”) CG 00 01 covering CGL on an occurrence basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (B) Automobile Liability: ISO Form CA 0001 covering any auto, or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired and non-owned, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(C)Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(D)Professional Liability (also known as Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to the work being performed, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate per policy period of one year.

If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Salinas requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

Additional Insured Status
The City of Salinas, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 11 85, or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 13 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this Agreement or the project described within this Agreement, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

Waiver of Subrogation
Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Salinas for all work performed by the Consultant, its employees, agents, and subcontractors.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared by Consultant to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, Consultant shall provide coverage to reduce or eliminate such self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or the consultant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administrations, and defense expenses. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.

Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:

1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of this Agreement or the beginning of Agreement work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Agreement of work.

3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the Agreement effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of Agreement work.

4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 14 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024
Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable insurance language effecting coverage required by this Agreement. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all sub-consultants and/or subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that Entity is an additional insured on insurance required from such sub-consultants and/or subcontractors.

Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

Maintenance of Insurance
Maintenance of insurance by Consultant as specified shall in no way be interpreted as relieving Consultant of its indemnification obligations or any responsibility whatsoever and the Consultant may carry, at its own expense, such additional insurance as it deems necessary.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 15 of 15 MNS Engineers, Inc.

May 2024
Exhibit B- Scope of Service
Scope of Service
The following Attachments are considered as part this Agreement:

1. Attachment A – Request For Qualifications for Construction Management Services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project – Phase 1 dated 3/11/2024.

2. Attachment B – MNS Statement of Qualifications for Construction Management Services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project – Phase 1 dated March 28, 2024.

3. Attachment C – MNS Project Schedule with cost Proposal and hourly rates.

J:\p\9510 - East Boronda Road Improvements\Construction Management\CM RFQ Final Doc.docx 1 | Page

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

FOR CITY OF SALINAS

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE BORONDA ROAD
CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 (CIP 9510)
You are invited to submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) to provide Construction Management Services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project – Phase 1 (CIP 9510).

SOQs shall be submitted electronically via the PlanetBids website until:

The full content of the RFQ is available through the City’s website at https://www.cityofsalinas.org/Your-Government/Find-a-Department/PublicWorks/Engineering/Bidding-Information, then by clicking on the PlanetBids.com link. Prospective proposers must register on the PlanetBids website to view and print request for qualifications package. Registration is free through the link provided. Only registered Consultants will receive updates and addenda. Requests for clarification regarding this RFQ must be submitted through PlanetBids’ Q/A tab and received no later than 4 pm on March 19, 2024.

The City of Salinas is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

The City of Salinas does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, religion, sexual orientation, age, disability, marital status, political affiliation, or any other nonmerit factor. The City of Salinas makes reasonable accommodation for individuals with a disability. Individuals requiring any accommodation in order to participate in this process must inform the Public Works Department at [email protected] or 831-758-7241 no later than 4 pm of the last day prior to the submittal date. Hearing impaired or TTY/TDD Text Telephone users may contact the City by dialing 711 for the California Relay Services (CRS) or by telephoning any other service providers’ CRS telephone number.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 2 | Page

SUMMARY
Proposal Due Date: 12 noon (PDT) on March 28, 2024
Submittals: Proposals shall be submitted electronically via the PlanetBids website.

Project Manager: Josie Lantaca, Assistant Engineer
City of Salinas
Public Works Department
200 Lincoln Ave.

Salinas, CA 93901
Notification List: The full content of the RFQ is available through the City’s website at https://www.cityofsalinas.org/Your-Government/Find-aDepartment/Public-Works/Engineering/Bidding-Information, then by clicking on the PlanetBids.com link. Prospective proposers must register on the PlanetBids website to view and print RFQ package. Registration is free through the link provided.

Only registered Consultants will receive updates and addenda.

Pre-Proposal Meeting: None scheduled.

Construction Documents: The construction documents are included for review on PlanetBids.

Inquiries: Requests for clarification regarding this RFQ must be submitted through PlanetBids’ Q/A tab and received no later than 4 pm on March 19, 2024. Written responses to timely inquiries will be posted on or about March 22, 2024.

Funding: Funding for the project includes local funds.

DIR Registration: All Consultants (prime and subs) must possess and maintain registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) in order to be awarded and to perform work on public works projects. The following is the link to

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 3 | Page
DIR’s Contractor Registration: https://www.dir.ca.gov/PublicWorks/Contractor-Registration.html.

This work is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

Additionally, all prime and sub Consultants must furnish certified payroll records to the City and directly to the Labor Commissioner (aka Division of Labor Standards Enforcement) on a weekly basis and in the format prescribed by the City and DIR, which may include electronic submission.

Anticipated Schedule:

Proposal Review and Evaluation: week of April 1, 2024
Notify Selection of Consultants: week of April 1, 2024
Oral Interviews (if Necessary): week of April 8, 2024
Selection/Negotiation: week of April 8, 2024
Contract Award: April 23, 2024
Local Purchasing Preference Ordinance:

The City of Salinas Local Purchasing Preference Ordinance encourages participation of local business through the implementation of the city’s local purchasing regulations. In determining the best-qualified and responsible, responsive firm, those who qualify as a local business enterprise shall receive a credit of 10% of its total points.

Professional service providers must submit a Declaration of Local Business Form to the City’s Finance Department. Refer to Section 12, Article III-A of the Salinas Municipal Code:
https://library.municode.com/ca/salinas/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIITHCO_CH12FI _ARTIII-ALOPUPR

DESCRIPTION
The City of Salinas’ Public Works Department is seeking to retain a Construction Management firm to oversee the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 1 Project. The Project includes widening and intersection improvements of approximately 0.7 miles of East Boronda Road between Dartmouth Way and 1,700 feet east of McKinnon Street intersection, including a new multi-lane roundabout at the McKinnon Street and Boronda Road intersection. Work also includes but is not limited to: construction of storm water treatment facilities and bioretention facilities in the roadway medians, islands, and adjacent to sidewalks, construction of shared-use

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 4 | Page
paths, construction of bike lanes, bus pullouts, street lighting, sidewalks, ADA pedestrian access ramps, installation of storm drain lines, sanitary sewer mainline extension, pavement delineation, roadway signs, landscaping, and all other related improvements and requirements.

The construction management services will include project and construction management, environmental/biological monitoring services, labor compliance services, inspection services, materials and field-testing services, and public outreach.

This Request for Qualifications describes the Scope of Work, the necessary components of the Proposal, the Consultant selection process, and a sample copy of the Standard Professional Services Agreement.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
TASK 1 - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
The Construction period begins with issuance of Notice to Proceed (NTP) to the Contractor and ends with Final Payment to the Contractor, which occurs approximately thirty-five (35) days after final written acceptance of the Project by the Salinas City Council. Total Construction period is estimated to be at 26 months (June 1, 2024, to August 31, 2026) Construction Management services shall be provided on a time and materials basis based on a not to exceed agreed upon price for the duration described above. Construction Management Services will consist of following tasks:

Subtask 1.1: Construction Management (CM)
Consultant shall provide a full-time Construction Manager (CM), inspectors as required, and field assistant on job site for the full duration of the construction phase. The Contractor for the project will provide a field office for CM in accordance with the requirements stipulated in Project Documents. CM shall manage and direct the activities of the testing firms; manage and direct activities of technical inspectors; and technical observation of construction work for compliance with the construction Contract Documents.

CM shall prepare Construction Management Plan which will establish the procedures that will be followed by Consultant in executing the technical and administrative functions of the project construction process.

Subtask 1.2: File Maintenance

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 5 | Page
CM shall track project documents through PROCORE or similar online software including, but not limited to the following subtasks. Ensure all documentation complies with the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM).

1.2.1: Correspondence; reports of job conferences; shop drawings and sample submittals; reproductions of original Contract Documents including all Addenda, Change Orders, field orders, and additional drawings issued subsequent to the execution of Contract; clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents; Progress Reports; and other project-related documents.

1.2.2: Diaries or logbooks recording hours on the job site, weather conditions, data relative to questions of extras or deductions, list of principal visitors, activities, decisions, observations in general, and specific observations in more detail (as in the case of observing test procedures), including photos of activities in the daily logs.

1.2.3: Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all Contractors, subcontractors, and major suppliers of equipment and materials.

Subtask 1.3: Visitors
Accompany City of Salinas visiting inspectors or other agencies having jurisdiction over the Project and record the outcome of these inspections.

Subtask 1.4: Meetings

1.4.1: Pre-Construction Conference. Conduct a Pre-Construction Conference for the purpose of acquainting the Contractor with the City of Salinas, design engineer, project site, and the procedures required.

1.4.2: Weekly Construction and Job Progress Meetings. Arrange and conduct Weekly Job Progress Meeting with Contractor on-site personnel to discuss the Project with particular emphasis on schedule, quality of work, and contract issues. Prepare agenda and minutes of all meetings and circulate minutes for participants' review within three (3) calendar days after the meeting. Provide copies to attendees and the City of Salinas.

1.4.3: Other Construction Meetings. Arrange and conduct other constructionrelated meetings deemed appropriate such as presentations to the City’s Council or Committees, on an as-needed basis.

Subtask 1.5: Technical Inspections

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 6 | Page
Provide qualified technical inspectors, as required in addition to the work performed by CM, to observe all construction work for compliance with the construction Contract Documents. Adequate observation will be provided to ascertain that construction is in conformance with the Contract Documents. Consultant will guard the City of Salinas against defects and deficiencies in the work of the construction Contractor.

Inspector shall verify and confirm construction staking is consistent with Construction Documents.

Serve as the field inspector of record for all testing and inspection work as required per the City’s Quality Assurance Program (QAP) and compliance with the LAPM.

Subtask 1.6: Project Coordination
Serve as the City of Salinas's liaison with the Contractors and assist Contractors' superintendents in understanding the intent of the Contract Documents. Consult with City of Salinas in advance of scheduling major tests, inspections, or start of important phases of the work.

Coordinate and track all submittals, requests for information (RFIs), Potential Change Orders (PCOs), and construction change orders (CCOs) in a timely manner to prevent any project delays.

Review and identify any design conflicts. Coordinate RFIs with City and design team.

Subtask 1.7: Change Orders
Upon determination by Consultant, Design Engineer and the City of Salinas that a Change Order is required, and at the direction of the City of Salinas, negotiate with the Contractors the cost and time of Change Orders designed by the design team, and prepare change orders and calculations per the project specifications and the state standard specifications.

Subtask 1.8: Reports
Provide electronic copies of all reports described in the following subtasks to the City of Salinas.

1.8.1: Daily Reports. Prepare a written daily construction inspection report, which shall include work activities, testing, acceptance and rejection of work, and general qualitative matters.

1.8.2: Weekly Reports. Provide a weekly summary of major items of activity (and inactivity) and problems during the week.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 7 | Page

1.8.3: Monthly Reports. Provide a monthly report focusing on the status of the Project and covering at a minimum the following areas:
• Work completed during the period.
• Schedule and schedule impacts.
• Quality control.
• RFI/DCR Logs
• Change Order logs, status and impacts.
• Potential Claims and decision strategy.
• Contractors' Progress Payment.
• Construction Photographs
Subtask 1.9: Progress Payments
Review Contractor's monthly request on Progress Payment. Consultant shall use reasonable care in its examination of requests for payments of Contractor under its Contract with the City of Salinas, in accordance with the City of Salinas's requirements, to ascertain whether work has been done in the manner required and whether payments are due under the construction contract. Review/verify quantities with the contractor and inspector prior to submittal of contractor’s pay application. The CM shall prepare, approve, and sign off quantity calculation sheets for each item of work per pay application or payment request. Verify that each progress payment request is in order and acceptable for processing, provide written recommendation for approval or disapproval, and forward same to City of Salinas.

Subtask 1.10: Schedule
Review Contractor's Baseline Construction Schedule, schedule of shop drawing submittals, and other schedules prepared by Contractor for general adequacy relating to number of task breakdowns, correlation with items from schedule of values for progress payments, task durations and sequences, float time, critical path location, and the like.

Monitor construction progress and review monthly updated schedules submitted by each Contractor. Note deviations from actual progress versus the "As-Planned" Schedule and advise City of Salinas immediately of the impact of each deviation, any remedial action taken by the Contractor, and Consultant’s recommendations regarding remedial action.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 8 | Page
Respond to all time extension requests, review and approve time impact analysis (TIAs) and provide approval justifications of any time extensions per the Project Specifications and the State Standard Specifications.

Subtask 1.11: Progress Photos
Document Contractor’s work on weekly basis with digital photographs and digital video construction. Maintain these photographs and digital video, together with the photographs provided by each Contractor, in a chronological electronic photograph album. Provide written captions for each photograph, including location and date taken. Prior to start of construction, videotape the sites of the work to document existing conditions. Photograph all work completed in the various phases of construction.

Subtask 1.12: Defective Work
Notify Contractors and City of Salinas whenever any work is judged to be unsatisfactory, faulty, or defective; does not conform to the Contract Documents, has been damaged; or does not meet the requirements of inspections, tests, or approvals required to be made. Advise Contractor when work should be corrected, rejected, uncovered for observation, or requires special testing or inspection.

Subtask 1.13: Claims and Protests
Provide research on and recommendations and negotiation assistance involving construction claims and protests until the City of Salinas renders a decision on any such claim or protest. Advise City of Salinas in a timely manner of potential contract claim and/or protest situations and maintain records and documents pertinent to each potential claim and/or protest in separate files. Assistance with claims and protests that are not the responsibility of Consultant, and which extend beyond the construction contract time limitations stipulated herein will be provided as a Supplemental Service on a time and expense basis.

Subtask 1.14: Project Close Out
Advise design team members of the schedule for equipment and system operational tests to be witnessed by them. Advise City of Salinas maintenance staff of the same.

Before recommending the issuance of a Certification of Substantial Completion, submit to the Contractor a list of observed Contract deficiency items requiring correction.

Conduct a Final Inspection in the company of appropriate design team members, City of Salinas, and Contractor, and prepare a Final Punch List. Verify that all items on the Final Punch List have been corrected and make recommendations concerning acceptance.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 9 | Page
Assemble signed copies of all project-related warranties and guarantees and provide City of Salinas with four (4) copies of the same. Deliver electronic and four (4) paper copies of all manufacturers’ approved O&M Manuals to City of Salinas.

Review record drawings provided by the contractor. Verify for accuracy. Stamp and initial record drawing after verifications.

TASK 2 – LABOR COMPLIANCE
Subtask 2.1: Advise Contractors of all Labor Compliance Requirements Inform the contractor(s), via pre-construction meeting of state and federal prevailing wage requirements and local labor compliance requirements.

Provide a checklist to the Prime contractor and each subcontractor of laws and regulations which need to be followed to comply with state and federal prevailing wage requirements and forms required per the City of Salinas Labor Compliance Program.

Subtask 2.2: Compliance Monitoring
Assist the City with the completion and filing of PWC-100 form. The PWC-100 is to be filed within 30 days of contract award, but no later than the first day of work begins on the project.

Verification of valid DIR Registrations, California Contractor’s State License Board and City of Salinas business licenses for all Contractors prior to commencement of work through project completion.

Review and comparison of work classification with DIR prevailing wage classifications to ensure the contractor is paying the correct prevailing wage.

Receive, securely store, review and audit weekly Certified Payroll Records (CPRs), including but not limited to: correct classification of workers, proper wages being paid, proper calculation and payment of fringe benefits and training contributions, review overtime, shift pay, weekend and holiday work/pay, only permissible deductions will be allowed, cross reference of onsite interviews with certified payroll records to verify all workers are listed and review the “Statement of Compliance” is complete and properly signed.

Respond to any inconsistencies or deliberate deceptions on the part of contractors through additional detailed audit of contractors through the review of cancelled checks, timecards, and related records (as needed) and seek appropriate resolution consistent to State and Federal regulations.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 10 | Page
Jobsite audits and random interviews of workers (to determine veracity of certified payroll records, compliance with anti-kickback statue, equal employment opportunity requirements, jobsite posting requirements, etc.). Confirmation that required State and Federal workplace posters and wage rates are posted on the project.

Subtask 2.3: Compliance Enforcement
Work with all contractors and subcontractors on resolving issues related to violations, penalties and compliance. All meetings and calls with contractors shall be documented.

Provide prompt communication of potential contractor violations, wage underpayment amounts to the City with the recommended action(s).

Notification of wages and penalties due through the use of a Prevailing Wage Audit Worksheet.

Provide other assistance relating to labor compliance enforcement as requested by the City.

Subtask 2.4: Required Reports
A Monthly Activity Report that includes the following:
 Executive Summary of Labor Compliance activities during the reporting period.
 Identification of labor compliance enforcement activities taken and the results.
 Restitution wages, penalties and liquidated damages assessed and collected.
 A matrix identifying current issues and their status.  Recommended actions for unresolved issues.

Project Closeout Report
Once the project is complete, send a final letter to the Contractor and any subcontractor who might still have outstanding items. Provide a 10-day window of time during which the Contractor/subcontractor can submit additional documentation or make corrections. Once that time expires, provide a Final Wage and Labor Compliance Report to the City.

Provide all CPRs and labor compliance related documentation to the City.

TASK 3 – ENVIRONMENTAL/BIOLOGICAL MONITORING SERVICES
Subtask 3.1: Provide environmental/biological monitoring services through a subcontract to ensure compliance with biological monitoring, and environmental

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 11 | Page
requirements, and CEQA documents. The CM will manage environmental/biological monitoring services, as outlined in the project’s environmental mitigation measures, and environmental documents.

Subtask 3.2: Permit Compliance Assistance
Assist City in identifying appropriate times during the construction process for inspection of items required by regulatory permits, coordinate such site visits and inspection with all parties and assist City of Salinas in documenting such site visits and inspections with all parties. Monitor contractor compliance with permit requirements, and environmental commitments, and advise City of Salinas as to Contractor’s compliance and any corrective measures required.

TASK 4 – MATERIALS AND FIELD-TESTING SERVICES
Provide materials and field-testing services through a subcontract. The CM will manage materials and field-testing services.

TASK 5 – PUBLIC OUTREACH
Provide direct communication with the Santa Rita School District, Salinas Union High School District, and residents within the 1-mile radius from McKinnon/Boronda intersection through monthly update in the form of newsletters outlining progress and schedule.

PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
Please follow our standard guidelines for the proposal.

GENERAL GUIDELINES
Include a table of contents and a page number on all sheets. The maximum number of pages is

35. The cover (front and back), cover/transmittal letter, table of contents, tabs or section dividers are excluded from the page limit count. The minimum font size for the body text shall be 11 points. The use of 11”x 17” size of paper is acceptable but leave to a minimum. Divider tabs are encouraged for each section listed below.

TRANSMITTAL LETTER
The transmittal letter should be on the Consultant’s letterhead and addressed to City of Salinas project manager, as indicated on the summary page of this RFQ. The letter should indicate the Consultant’s understanding of the City’s needs and work required. If an addendum has been issued, please acknowledge receipt of the addendum in the letter. The letter shall be signed by an official or representative authorized to negotiate and contractually bind the firm. Please

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 12 | Page
include return address and email address of the person that should be notified during the interview and negotiation process. The Consultant shall indicate their acceptability of the terms and conditions of the sample professional service agreement included as Attachment 1. Any requested deviations from the standard agreement should be noted with blue, underlined text for additions and red, strike-out text for deletions.

FORMAT
The following information must be included in the RFQ submittal in the order listed:

SECTION 1: FIRM PROFILE - A one to two page summary that identifies the likely project manager and a brief description of the Consultant’s firm, firm specialties including the year the firm was established, type of organization (partnership, corporation, etc.) and a statement of the firm’s qualifications for performing the subject consulting services.

SECTION 2: PROJECT TEAM - A one page organizational chart (up to 11x17 size) depicting the staffing proposed by the firm, and a one to three-page table summarizing the roles and responsibilities of the key team members who will be assigned to the project. Also, include a separate one-page chart of a standard sub-Consultant list to be used, if any, and their relevant expertise (one page resumes may be included in the Appendix).

SECTION 3: RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE - Provide no more than eight pages of brief summaries of relevant project experience with project management and construction support and management.

SECTION 4: LOCAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE - A one page list of local project delivery experience showing familiarity with the agencies located within Monterey County and the Central Coast.

Indicate the location of the firm’s nearest office and its ability to facilitate face to face meetings with jurisdictional representatives.

SECTION 5: SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT APPROACH - Provide up to five pages describing the firm’s approach to the public project delivery process and its ability to achieve budget and project delivery goals for projects of a similar complexity and nature as described in the scope of work.

Indicate how firm will apply its management techniques and resources towards these goals.

SECTION 6: REFERENCES - A one-page list of at least five recent references for projects with municipal government orsimilar types. Include bid price and final construction cost (if available), contact person, email address and phone number.

SECTION 7: APPENDIX - A brief appendix may be included (up to ten pages maximum) to provide other information that will assist the City of Salinas in selecting the most qualified Consultants, including one-page resumes for the project manager and key staff, and brief summaries for subConsultants that are used and comments on the Sample Agreement.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 13 | Page
SECTION 8: COST PROPOSAL AND FEE SCHEDULE - A one-page fixed fee schedule for a two-year period that includes the actual hourly rate for each classification of employees who will be assigned to the project and the fees for related support costs (mileage, prints, reproductions, etc.). Hourly rates will not change for 1 year of agreement and are allowed an annual adjustment of 3% maximum increase after the first year.

The cost proposal and fee schedule does not count as part of the page limit, and will not be used as part of the evaluation criteria. The cost proposal and fee schedule shall be submitted in a separate sealed envelope with the consultant’s name and address clearly stated on the sender’s info with the words “Cost Proposal and Fee Schedule – to be opened only after the selection process” written on the envelope. The sealed envelope shall be placed inside another envelope and mailed to: City of Salinas, Public Works Department, Attention: Josie Lantaca, 200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas, CA 93901.

EVALUATION
An evaluation committee consisting of City Staff and/or other qualified individuals will review each SOQ for completeness and content. Each SOQ will be evaluated based upon the relevant experience of the Consultant with local work. The evaluation committee will review and rank the SOQ and may conduct interviews, if necessary. The rankings will be based upon the following criteria:

1. Firm Profile (10 points max): Does the firm offer the breadth and quality of services required for the project listed in the Scope of Work?

2. Project Team (15 points max): Do the qualifications of key personnel to be assigned to the project coincide with tasks listed in the Scope of Work? Do assigned personnel and sub Consultants have requisite education, experience, and professional qualifications? Does the firm’s organizational structure show sufficient depth for its present workload?

3. Relevant Project Experience (20 points max): Has the firm demonstrated the ability to successfully provide service for projects of a similar complexity and nature as described herein?

4. Local Project Experience (10 points max): Is the firm familiar with Monterey County and City of Salinas? Does the firm understand the unique nature of the city? To what degree will the firm be able to facilitate face-to-face meetings with jurisdictional representatives?

5. Specific Management Approach (20 points max): Has the firm described its ability to achieve budget and project delivery goals for projects of a similar complexity and nature? How will the firm apply its management techniques and resources?

6. References (10 points max): Are the firm’s references from past clients and associates favorable? Is the firm financially stable?

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 14 | Page

7. Public Outreach/Information Experience (15 points max): Does the firm have experience with public presentations for projects, and reaching out to the public on politically challenging projects?

8. Local Purchasing Preference Ordinance (+10% of the total points obtained by Consultant): Is the Consultant recognized as a “Local Business” per Ordinance? Total possible points: 100 + (10% for Local Preference) An evaluation committee will review the SOQ’s and forward its recommendation to City Engineer.

The City Engineer will finalize the ranking, conduct Consultant interviews (if necessary), and recommend a Consultant to the City Council for final approval.

Aside from the selection process described herein, Consultants or their representatives are prohibited from attempting to influence this selection process by contacting Selection committee members, elected officials, City staff or other individuals or entities involved in selecting the Consultant or awarding the Consultant agreement. Any such attempt to influence selection outside of the prescribed process will be grounds for disqualification.

SELECTION PROCEDURE
The City of Salinas will select a Consultant for Construction Managementservices for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project – Phase 1, CIP 9510 based on the following procedure:

1. After the period has closed for receipt of SOQs, each SOQ will be examined to determine compliance with the format requirements specified in the RFQ. Any SOQ that does not meet the format requirements may be rejected. The City may reject any SOQ if it is conditional or incomplete.

2. Evaluate the SOQs. Evaluations will be based on qualifications and the quality of the qualifications (see Section “Evaluation” above).

3. Develop a ranking of Consultants and determine if interviews are necessary.

4. Conduct oral interviews and evaluate oral interviews, if necessary.

5. Notify Consultants of the results.

6. Open the cost proposal and fee schedule from the top ranked Consultants and negotiate, as needed.

7. If a consensus cannot be reached on the terms of the Agreement and/or cost proposal, the next-highest ranked Consultant cost proposal and fee schedule will be opened.

8. The process is repeated until a contract is successfully negotiated.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 15 | Page
AWARD
Award of the selected Consultant’s contract will be subject to the City Council’s approval. Aside from announcing the top ranked proposal, the scored evaluations will be kept confidential unless production is otherwise required under State law.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

RECORDS AND FINANCIAL DATA
All correspondence with the City, including responses to this RFQ, will become the exclusive property of the City and will become public records under the California Public Records Act. All documents submitted in response to this Request for Qualifications will be subject to disclosure if requested by a member of the public. There are a very limited number of narrow exceptions to this disclosure requirement. During the selection process, until a firm is selected the City will not disclose proposals, except as otherwise required under applicable law. This means that, depending on the nature of timing of the request, or future court decisions, that information may not remain private and may be publicly disclosed. Rates for services are not considered confidential or proprietary and are subject to disclosure.

The following will be general information for the proposers:
a. A prospective firm may withdraw their responses at any time prior to the date and the time which is set forth herein as the deadline for submittal of SOQ. b. Each prospective firm submitting a SOQ in response to this RFQ agrees that the preparation of all materials and presentations are at the prospective firms’ sole cost and expense, and the City will not, under any circumstances, be responsible for any costs or expenses incurred by a prospective firm. In addition, each prospective firm understands and agrees that all documentation and materials submitted with a SOQ will remain the property of the City and will become a public document. c. The City reserves the right to request additional information from any and all prospective firms as deemed necessary by the City in order to evaluate the SOQ’s. This process may not be used, however, as an opportunity to submit missing documentation or to make substantive revisions to the original SOQ.
d. All terms will remain in effect and legally binding for at least one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of submission.
e. This RFQ shall be governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California and the jurisdiction of any disputes hereunder shall be had in Monterey County.

The City of Salinas reserves the right to (1) reject any or all responses, (2) postpone award of the contract for a period not to exceed ninety (90) calendar days from the date replies are due,

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 16 | Page
(3) waive informalities in the responses, and (4) take whatever action or make whatever decision it determines to be in the best interest of the City. The City of Salinas assumes no obligation in this general solicitation of Qualifications and all costs and expenses of responding to this RFQ shall be borne by the individual parties preparing and/or submitting a proposal.

Business License Requirements
If selected, the Consultant shall obtain a City of Salinas Business License. Refer to link for information:
https://www.cityofsalinas.org/Your-Government/Find-a-Department/Finance

INQUIRIES
Requests for clarification regarding this RFQ must be submitted through PlanetBids’ Q/A tab and received no later than 4 pm on March 19, 2024. Written responses to timely inquiries will be posted on or about March 22, 2024.

ATTACHMENTS:

Sample Agreement for Professional Services; Plans; Specifications; CEQA Documents; City of Salinas Quality Assurance Program (QAP); Salinas Labor Compliance Program

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT – PHASE 1 03/11/2024 RFQ – March 11, 2024 17 | Page

SAMPLE AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT A
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 1 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]

AGREEMENT

FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BETWEEN

THE CITY OF SALINAS AND
[CONSULTANT’S LEGAL NAME]

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 2 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
Contents
RECITALS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 TERMS ........................................................................................................................................... 4

1. Scope of Service. ................................................................................................................. 4

2. Term; Completion Schedule. ............................................................................................... 4

3. Compensation. ..................................................................................................................... 4

4. Billing. ................................................................................................................................. 4

5. Meet & Confer. .................................................................................................................... 5

6. Additional Copies................................................................................................................. 5

7. Responsibility of Consultant................................................................................................ 5

8. Responsibility of City. ......................................................................................................... 5

9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. .................................................................................... 6

10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. ................................................................................... 6

11. Insurance.............................................................................................................................. 6

12. Access to Records................................................................................................................ 6

13. Non-Assignability................................................................................................................ 6

14. Changes to Scope of Work. ................................................................................................. 6

15. Ownership of Documents. ................................................................................................... 7

16. Termination.......................................................................................................................... 7

17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. ................................................................ 8

18. Exhibits Incorporated........................................................................................................... 8

19. Independent Contractor........................................................................................................ 8

20. Integration and Entire Agreement........................................................................................ 8

21. Jurisdiction and Venue......................................................................................................... 8

22. Severability .......................................................................................................................... 8

23. Notices. ................................................................................................................................ 8

24. Nondiscrimination................................................................................................................ 9

25. Conflict of Interest. .............................................................................................................. 9

26. Headings. ........................................................................................................................... 10

27. Attorneys’ Fees.................................................................................................................. 10

28. Non-Exclusive Agreement................................................................................................. 10

29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement......................................................................... 10

30. Licenses.............................................................................................................................. 10

31. Counterparts....................................................................................................................... 10

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 3 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]

32. Legal Representation. ........................................................................................................ 10

33. Joint Representation........................................................................................................... 10

34. Warranty of Authority........................................................................................................ 10

35. No Waiver of Rights. ......................................................................................................... 11 Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements.............................................................................................. 13 Exhibit B- Scope of Service.......................................................................................................... 16

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 4 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND [EXACT LEGAL NAME]
This Agreement for Professional Services (the “Agreement” and/or “Contract”) is made and entered into this ____ day of ______, 201_, between the City of Salinas, a California Charter city and municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”), and [EXACT LEGAL NAME], a [California corporation/limited liability company/dba/etc.] (hereinafter “Consultant”).

NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant agree as follows:

TERMS

1. Scope of Service. The project contemplated and the scope of Consultant’s services are described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

2. Term; Completion Schedule. This Agreement shall commence on [XXX], and shall terminate on [XXX], unless extended in writing by either party upon (30) days written notice.

This Agreement may be extended only upon mutual written consent of the parties, and may be terminated only pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

4. Billing. Consultant shall submit to City an itemized invoice, prepared in a form satisfactory to City, describing its services and costs for the period covered by the invoice.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 5 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
Any such invoices shall be in full accord with any and all applicable provisions of this Agreement.

7. Responsibility of Consultant. By executing this Agreement, Consultant agrees that the services to be provided and work to be performed under this Agreement shall be performed in a fully competent manner. By executing this Agreement, Consultant further agrees and represents to City that the Consultant possesses, or shall arrange to secure from others, all of the necessary professional capabilities, experience, resources, and facilities necessary to provide the City the services contemplated under this Agreement and that City relies upon the professional skills of Consultant to do and perform Consultant’s work. Consultant further agrees and represents that Consultant shall follow the current, generally accepted practices in this area to the profession to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding the projects for which the services are rendered under this Agreement.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 6 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements, and systems pertinent to Consultant’s services. City may unilaterally change its representative upon notice to the Consultant.
(D) Give prompt written notice to Consultant whenever City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in a project.

10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless.

11. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance meeting the requirements specified in Exhibit A hereto.

Consultant shall provide proper facilities to City’s representative(s) for such access and inspection.

Execution of the amendment by City and Consultant shall constitute the Consultant’s notice to proceed with the changed scope.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 7 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]

16. Termination.
(A) City shall have the authority to terminate this Agreement, upon ten days written notice to Consultant, as follows:
(1) If in the City’s opinion the conduct of the Consultant is such that the interest of the City may be impaired or prejudiced, or
(2) For any reason whatsoever.
(B) Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to payment of such amount as fairly compensates Consultant for all work satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination based upon the Consultant’s rates shown in Exhibit B and/or Section 3 of this Agreement, except that:
(1) In the event of termination by the City for Consultant’s default, City shall deduct from the amount due Consultant the total amount of additional expenses incurred by City as a result of such default. Such deduction from amounts due Consultant are made to compensate City for its actual additional costs incurred in securing satisfactory performance of the terms of this Agreement, including but not limited to, costs of engaging another consultant(s) for such purposes. In the event that such additional expenses shall exceed amounts otherwise due and payable to Consultant hereunder, Consultant shall pay City the full amount of such expense. (C) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, Consultant shall:
(1) Upon receipt of written notice of such termination promptly cease all services on this project, unless otherwise directed by City; and (2) Deliver to City all documents, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software output, video and audio tapes, and any other materials provided to Consultant or prepared by or for Consultant or the City in connection with this Agreement. Such material is to be delivered to City in completed form; however, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 15 herein, City may condition payment for

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 8 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
services rendered to the date of termination upon Consultant’s delivery to the City of such material.
(D) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, City is hereby expressly permitted to assume the projects and complete them by any means, including but not limited to, an agreement with another party.
(E) The rights and remedy of the City and Consultant provided under this Section are not exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or appearing in any other section of this Agreement.

21. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, County of Monterey, and City of Salinas.

Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in the State of California, in the County of Monterey or in the appropriate federal court with jurisdiction over the matter.

23. Notices.
(A) Written notices to the City hereunder shall, until further notice by City, be addressed to:

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 9 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
City Manager
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
With a copy to:

City Attorney
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
(B) Written notices to the Consultant shall, until further notice by the Consultant, be addressed to:

Consultant’s Representative Name, Title
Firm Name
Address
Email
Phone #
(C) The execution of any such notices by the City Manager shall be effective as to Consultant as if it were by resolution or order of the City Council, and Consultant shall not question the authority of the City Manager to execute any such notice. (D) All such notices shall either be delivered personally to the other party’s designee named above, or shall be deposited in the United States Mail, properly addressed as aforesaid, postage fully prepaid, and shall be effective the day following such deposit in the mail.

25. Conflict of Interest. Consultant warrants and declares that it presently has no interest, and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, in any manner or degree which will render the services required under the provisions of this Agreement a violation of any applicable local, state or federal law. Consultant further declares that, in the performance of this Agreement, no subcontractor or person having such an interest shall be employed. In the event that any conflict of interest should nevertheless hereinafter arise, Consultant shall promptly notify City of the existence of such conflict of interest so that City may determine whether to

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 10 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
terminate this Agreement. Consultant further warrants its compliance with the Political Reform Act (Government Code section 81000 et seq.) and Salinas City Code Chapter 2A that apply to Consultant as the result of Consultant’s performance of the work or services pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

26. Headings. The section headings appearing herein shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify, or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions of this Agreement.

28. Non-Exclusive Agreement. This Agreement is non-exclusive and both City and Consultant expressly reserves the right to contract with other entities for the same or similar services.

31. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single agreement.

34. Warranty of Authority. Each party represents and warrants that it has the right, power, and authority to enter into this Agreement. Each party further represents and warrants that it has

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 11 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
given any and all notices, and obtained any and all consents, powers, and authorities, necessary to permit it, and the persons entering into this Agreement for it, to enter into this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the date first written above.

CONSULTANT
___________________________________
By (Printed Name): ___________________
Its (Title): ___________________________

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 12 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 13 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements
Insurance Requirements
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. With respect to General Liability and Professional Liability, coverage should be maintained for a minimum of five (5) years after Agreement completion.

OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 14 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this Agreement or the project described within this Agreement, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Salinas for all work performed by the Consultant, its employees, agents, and subcontractors.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.

Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:

1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of this Agreement or the beginning of Agreement work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Agreement of work.

4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 15 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable insurance language effecting coverage required by this Agreement. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

Form: Professional Services Agreement v. November 2023 Page 16 of 16 [Consultant Name]
[Agreement Month and Year]
Exhibit B- Scope of Service
[Scope of Service; Compensation]

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-156, Version: 1
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phases 1 and 2A (CIP 9510) - Sparling Ranch Credits Purchase Authorizing the Interim City Manager to enter into an Agreement with South Bay Conservation Resources, LLC for the purchase of 11.06 Sparling Ranch Conservation Credits in an amount not to exceed $608,300 for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phases 1 and 2A.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/3/2024
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 7, 2024
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PE, LS, DIRECTOR
BY: JOSIE LANTACA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER
TITLE: BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT PHASES 1
AND 2A (CIP 9510) – SPARLING RANCH CREDITS PURCHASE
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion authorizing the Interim City Manager to enter into an Agreement with South Bay Conservation Resources, LLC for the purchase of 11.06 Sparling Ranch Conservation Credits in an amount not to exceed $608,300 for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phases 1 and 2a .

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

During the environmental phase of the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project (Project), the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) consulted with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for a Biological Opinion (BO) of the Project. The Service has determined that the area of land impacted by the Project is considered a permanent loss of habitat for the California redlegged frog and California tiger salamander. The Service issued a revised BO that contains environmental measures to minimize effects to California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders. The revised BO was then submitted to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for a consistency determination.

The revised BO stated that the City will compensate for the permanent loss of upland California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander habitat by purchasing credits from the Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank (Sparling Ranch). Sparling Ranch is a Service and CDFW approved conservation bank in good standing for its credits for sale as compensation for the loss of habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander.

A Sparling Ranch Credit for muti-species costs $55,000 per credit. Due to limited project funding, staff is only recommending the credit purchase for Phases 1 and 2a. The total required credit purchase for Phases 1 and 2a is 11.06 credits which amounts to $608,300.00.

BACKGROUND:

Page | 2
The Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project proposes to widen East Boronda Road into a fourlane roadway (two-lanes at each direction) between Dartmouth Way to Independence Boulevard, and to construct roundabouts at McKinnon Street, El Dorado Drive, Natividad Road, and Independence Boulevard. In May 2017, City Council approved the roundabout concept at the intersections identified above along with Hemingway Drive through Resolution 21169.

The proposed Project includes the following improvements to East Boronda Road from approximately 140 feet east of Dartmouth Way to approximately 1,100 feet east of Independence Boulevard:

1. Widen East Boronda Road from east of Dartmouth Way to east of Independence Boulevard from two lanes to four lanes;

2. Construct multi‐lane roundabouts at McKinnon Street, El Dorado Drive, Natividad Road, and Independence Boulevard;

3. Relocate existing agricultural ditches along the north side of East Boronda Road north of the improvements;

4. Relocate existing agricultural ditch along the east side of Natividad Road to the east;

5. Construct stormwater treatment facilities and bioretention facilities to mitigate runoff from the improvements;

6. Construct buffered bike lanes;

7. Construct shared‐use paths at the roundabouts;

8. Install a flashing beacon system or other approved pedestrian activated beacon at the a. pedestrian crossings;

9. Widen the East Boronda Road Bridge over Gabilan Creek to accommodate the road widening and roundabout;

10. Construct bus pullouts, street lighting, sidewalks, ADA-compliant pedestrian curb ramps at all crosswalks; and install storm drain lines, sanitary sewer mainline and extensions, and pavement delineation and street signs; and

11. Install landscaping.

The Project is planned to be built in phases to accommodate funding availability. Phase 1 will build the McKinnon roundabout and associated improvements from east of Dartmouth Way to a point between McKinnon Street and El Dorado Drive. Phase 2 will continue the roadway widening from eastern Phase 1 limit to a point east of Natividad Road. The Phase 2 project is further divided into Phase 2a and Phase 2b. Phase 2a will build the El Dorado roundabout and its associated improvements, and Phase 2b will build the Natividad roundabout and its associated improvements.

Phase 3 will continue the remainder of the Project from the eastern Phase 2 limit to a point east of Independence Boulevard, including the construction of the Independence roundabout.

The Phase 1 project is currently being advertised for bidding and will be presented to the City Council for award of contract next month, contingent on a successful bidding process.

During the environmental phase of the Project, the USACE performed a site visit and claimed jurisdiction over a portion of the agricultural ditch located between McKinnon Elementary School and East Boronda Road. The USACE agreed to the City’s submitting an application for a USACE Nationwide Permit (NWP) for Phases 1 and 2 of the Project. Phase 3 will need a separate environmental permit due to its proximity and possible impacts to the Gabilan Creek. During the NWP permitting process, the USACE consulted with the US Fish and Wildlife Service for a Page | 3
Biological Opinion. The Service has determined that the area of land impacted by the widening of East Boronda Road, and the construction of the roundabouts is considered a permanent loss of habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander. The Service issued a BO that contains mitigation measures to minimize effects to California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders. During the BO’s review, a minor discrepancy was found on the document related to the numbering of the mitigation measures. Therefore, a revised BO was issued.

The Service’s revised BO was then submitted to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for a consistency determination. A consistency determination (Determination) dated September 22, 2023, was issued by the CDFW. The Determination states that the Service’s incidental take statement and accompanying revised BO are consistent with the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).

The revised BO stated that the City will compensate for the permanent loss of upland California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander habitat by purchasing credits from Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank. Sparling Ranch is a Service and CDFW approved conservation bank in good standing for its credits for sale as compensation for the loss of habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander.

The City will need to secure compensatory mitigation for each phase of the project in advance of the beginning of each phase. The required credit purchase for each phase is as follows: Phase 1 –

4.72 credits, Phase 2a – 6.34 credits, and Phase 2b – 9.7 credits. The City will then need to submit to the Service and CDFW a copy of the bill of sale(s) and payment receipt prior to each phase of the project.

A Sparling Ranch Credit for muti-species costs $55,000 per credit. Due to limited project funding, staff is recommending credit purchase for only Phases 1 and 2a. Totaling 11.06 credits which amounts to $608,300.00.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The environmental impacts of the project have been analyzed in accordance with CEQA guidelines. An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the project. Based upon review of the IS, the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) have been included in the project.

A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, and on November 3, 2020, the Salinas City Council adopted and approved the MND and MMRP for the project.

In addition, the following Environmental Permits have been received for Phases 1 & 2 of the Project:

A. Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board):

Section 401 Permit/Water Quality Certification was issued by the Water Board in October 2021.

B. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE):

Page | 4
USACE Nationwide Permit (NWP) for Phases 1 & 2 was received on May 9, 2023. a. On April 24, 2023, a reinitiated Biological Opinion was issued by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, through the USACE consultation process. The reinitiated BO contains environmental measures to minimize effects to California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders.
b. A Consistency Determination dated September 22, 2023, was issued by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The Determination states that the Service’s incidental take statement and accompanying revised BO are consistent with the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The project addresses the City Council’s Strategic Goals of Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, and Economic Development.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The process of administering this project involves Public Works, Community Development, Finance, and Legal Departments. Public Works Department is the lead on this Project in close coordination with Community Development and Legal Departments in the review of the CEQA Documents. The Finance Department manages the proper disbursement of funds, and will be involved with reporting requirements of certain grants/funds.

In addition, there has been an extensive and iterative coordination effort between West Area Specific Plan, Central Area Specific Plan, and the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project to ensure consistency with the projects.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Funding sources for the Project include the following:

Measure G (Resolution No. 22507) $5,500,000
Development Fees - Arterial $5,818,176
Gas Tax $1,000,000
Measure X – Transport Safety & Inv Plan $2,318,918
Regional Surface Transportation Program fund through
TAMC (Competitive Grant)
$4,000,000
Air District Grant $400,000
Total $19,037,094
Expenditures (encumbered & expended through April 23, 2024) ($3,500,598) Currently Available $15,536,496
Expenditures include spent and encumbered funds for the project’s environmental, preliminary design, and detailed design phases. The Sparling Ranch credit purchase in the amount of $608,300 will be paid from the Development Fees – Arterial fund.

Page | 5
ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Sparling Ranch Purchase Agreement
Revised Biological Opinion from the US Fish and Wildlife Service Project Phasing Layout

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CITY OF SALINAS AND SOUTH BAY CONSERVATION RESOURCES, LLC FOR THE PURCHASE OF 11.06 SPARLING RANCH CONSERVATION CREDITS IN THE AMOUNT OF $608,300 FOR THE BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT, PHASES 1 AND 2A
WHEREAS, during the environmental phase of the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project, the United States Army Corps of Engineers consulted with the US Fish and Wildlife Service for a Biological Opinion of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the US Fish and Wildlife Service has determined that the area of land impacted by the Project is considered a permanent loss of habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service issued a revised Biological Opinion that contains environmental measures to minimize effects to California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders; and
WHEREAS, the revised Biological Opinion stated that the City will compensate for the permanent loss of upland California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander habitat by purchasing credits from Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank; and WHEREAS, Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank is a US Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife approved conservation bank in good standing for its credits for sale as compensation for the loss of habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves the Agreement between the City of Salinas and South Bay Conservation Resources, LLC for the Sale of Conservation Credits in the amount of $608,300 to compensate for the loss of habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander impacted by the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phases 1 and 2a; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Interim City Manager is hereby authorized and directed, for and on behalf of the City of Salinas, and as its act and deed, to execute the attached Purchase Agreement; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Interim City Manager is authorized to execute modifications to the Agreement and to take any additional action may be necessary to effectuate the intent of this resolution.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of May 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

Page 2 of 2 ends

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Agreement for Sale of Conservation Credits
This Agreement is entered into this day of , 2024, by and between South Bay Conservation Resources, LLC, a California limited liability company (Bank Sponsor) and City of Salinas (Project Applicant), jointly referred to as the “Parties,” as follows:

RECITALS
A. The Bank Sponsor has developed the Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank (Bank) located in Santa Clara and San Benito Counties, California; and
B. The Bank was approved by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) on June 13, 2017, and is currently in good standing with the Service and Department; and
C. The Bank has received approval from the Service and Department to offer California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) and California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) credits for sale as compensation for the loss of California tiger salamander and/or California red-legged frog through the Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank Enabling Agreement (Bank Agreement); and D. Project Applicant is seeking to implement the project described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto (Project), which would unavoidably and adversely impact California tiger salamander and/or California red-legged frog, and seeks to compensate for the loss of California tiger salamander and/or California redlegged frog by purchasing Conservation Credits from Bank Sponsor; and E. Project Applicant has been authorized by the Department File No. 2080-2023-015-04, Service File No. 2022-0079978-S7-001, USACE File No SPN 2017-00402 to purchase from the Bank Sponsor

11.06 multi-species California tiger salamander upland habitat and California red-legged frog credits upon confirmation by the Bank Sponsor of credit availability/adequate balance of credits remaining for sale; and F. Project Applicant desires to purchase from Bank Sponsor, and Bank Sponsor desires to sell to Project Applicant 11.06 multi-species California tiger salamander upland habitat and California red-legged frog credits;
Now, therefor, the parties agree as follows:

1. Bank Sponsor hereby sells to Project Applicant and Project Applicant hereby purchases from Bank Sponsor 11.06 multi-species California tiger salamander upland habitat and California redlegged frog credits for the purchase price of $608,300. The Bank Sponsor will then deliver to Project Applicant an executed Bill of Sale in the manner and form as attached hereto and marked Exhibit “B”. The purchase price for said credits shall be paid by cashier’s check or, at the option of Bank Sponsor, wire transfer of funds according to written instructions by Bank Sponsor to Project Applicant.

2. The sale and transfer herein is not intended as a sale or transfer to Project Applicant of a security, license, lease, easement, or possessory or non-possessory interest in real property, nor the granting of any interest of the foregoing.

3. Project Applicant shall have no obligation whatsoever by reason of the purchase of the Conservation Credits, to support, pay for, monitor, report on, sustain, continue in perpetuity, or otherwise be obligated or liable for the success or continued expense or maintenance in perpetuity of the credits sold, or the Bank. Pursuant to the Bank Agreement and any amendments thereto, Bank Sponsor shall monitor and make reports to the Service and Department on the status of any Conservation Credits sold to Project Applicant. Bank Sponsor shall be fully and completely responsible for satisfying any and all conditions placed on the Bank or the Conservation Credits by the Service, Department, and other state or federal jurisdictional agencies.

4. The Conservation Credits sold and transferred to Project Applicant shall be nontransferable and non-assignable, and shall not be used as compensatory mitigation for any other Project or purpose, except as set forth herein.

5. Project Applicant must exercise his/her/its right to purchase the Conservation Credits within 10 days of the date of this Agreement. After the 10 day period this Agreement will be considered null and void.

Upon purchase of the credits specified in paragraph D above, the Bank Sponsor shall submit to the CBRT Members listed in the Notices section of the Bank Agreement / Bank Enabling Instrument, copies of the:
a) Agreement for Sale of Conservation Credits; b) Bill of Sale; c) Payment Receipt; and d) an updated ledger. The updated inventory / ledger must detail: i) Project Applicant; ii) Project Name; iii) Status (sale complete/sale not complete); iv) Credit Sale Date; v) Service and/or Department File Number; vi) U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers File Number (if applicable); vii) Total Number of Credits Authorized to Sell; vii) Total Number of Credits Sold to Date (inclusive); and ix) Balance of all Credits Available. The inventory / ledger should include all sales data from bank opening/establishment to the present.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written.

BANK SPONSOR:

South Bay Conservation Resources, LLC, a California limited liability By: _______________________________________________ Date: _____________________ PROJECT APPLICANT:

City of Salinas
By: _______________________________________________ Date: _____________________ UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE:

By: _______________________________________________ Date: _____________________ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE:

By: _______________________________________________ Date: _____________________ Exhibit “A”
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project – Phases 1 and 2a (CIP 9510) The Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phases 1 and 2a will include the widening of Boronda Road from Dartmouth Way to approximately 900 feet east of El Dorado Drive, from two lanes to four lanes, including construction of roundabouts at the intersections of McKinnon Street and El Dorado Drive. The widening would occur along the northern edge of the existing road areas that are under active agricultural cultivation. An existing drainage ditch along the north side of East Boronda Road would be relocated approximately 100 feet to the north to accommodate the road widening. The project will also include the construction of bike and shoulder lanes, bus pullouts, and sidewalks, construction of stormwater treatment facilities and bioretention facilities in the roadway medians, islands, and adjacent to sidewalks, and installation of storm drain lines, sanitary sewer mainlines, landscaping, and other related improvements. [Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phases 1 & 2a (CIP 9510) (Department, File No. 2080- 2023-015-04, USFW 2022-0079978-S7-001, USACE File No SPN 2017-00402,) Monterey County, California]
Exhibit “B”

BILL OF SALE
Contract # SRCB 24-01
Bank CDFW Tracking No. 1798-2013-08-R4, USFWS File No. 08EVEN-2014-B-0086 Project Applicant Service No. USFW File No: 2022-0079978-S7-001, Department File No: 2080-2023- 015-04, USACE File No SPN 2017-00402
In consideration of $608,300 receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, South Bay Conservation Resources, LLC, a California limited liability company (Bank Sponsor) does hereby bargain, sell and transfer to City of Salinas (Project Applicant), 11.06 multi-species California tiger salamander upland habitat and California red-legged frog credits in the Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank in Santa Clara and San Benito Counties, California, developed, and approved by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Bank Sponsor represents and warrants that it has good title to the credits, has good right to sell the same, and that they are free and clear of all claims, liens, or encumbrances.

Bank Sponsor covenants and agrees with the buyer to warrant and defend the sale of the credits hereinbefore described against all and every person and persons whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same.

DATED: ______________________________________
South Bay Conservation Resources, LLC, a California limited liability company By: ___________________________________________
Exhibit “C”
Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank

MULTI-SPECIES CREDITS
CALIFORNIA RED-LEGGED FROG AND CALIFORNIA TIGER SALAMANDER CREDITS:

PAYMENT RECEIPT

PARTICIPANT INFORMATION
Name: City of Salinas
Address: 200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, CA 93901
Telephone: 831-758-7185
Contact: Josie Lantaca, Email: [email protected]

PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Description: Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project – Phases 1 & 2a (CIP 9510) Service/Department File
Number:

USFW File No: 2022-0079978-S7-001, CDFW File No: 2080-2023- 015-04
Other Agency File Number(s): USACE File No: SPN 2017-00402 Species/Habitat Affected: Multi-species California tiger salamander upland habitat and California red-legged frog credits
Credits to be Purchased: 11.06
Payment Amount: $608,300
Project Location: City of Salinas
County/Address: Monterey County, CA

PAYMENT INFORMATION
Payee: South Bay Conservation Resources, LLC, a California limited liability company Payer: City of Salinas
Amount: $608,300
Method of payment: Cash ________ Check No. ________ Money Order No. ________ Received by: ____________________________________________ Date: ________________ (Signature)
Name: _______________________________________ Title: ____________________________ IN REPLY REFER TO:
2022-0079978-S7-001
April 24, 2023
Frances Malamud-Roam
Project Manager, Regulatory Division
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
450 Golden Gate Avenue, 4th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102
Subject: Reinitiation of the Biological Opinion on the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project, Monterey County, California (Corps File No.

SPL-2017-00402)
Dear Frances Malamud-Roam:

This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) reinitiated biological opinion based on our review of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) proposed issuance of a permit, pursuant to section 404 of the Clean Water Act, to the City of Salinas Public Works Department (City). The Corps proposes to authorize the City to widen road areas that would result in the relocation of an existing drainage ditch. The purpose of this reinitiation is to update the project description (phase 3 is no longer part of the project), and mitigation of the effects of the project. At issue are the project’s effects on the federally threatened California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) and the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense), in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

We have based this reinitiated biological opinion on information that accompanied your original request for consultation, including the Habitat Assessment Report (EMC Planning Group Inc. 2020), and information received on September 8 and 21, 2022.

Consultation History
We received your original request for formal consultation on April 22, 2021 and completed the biological opinion on January 4, 2022. We received your request for reinitiation of formal consultation on September 8, 2022. We received sufficient information to initiate consultation on September 21, 2022.

On November 30, 2022, we met with the Corps, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and City to discuss the possibility of a consistency determination from CDFW based on the Service’s reinitiated biological opinion.

Frances Malamud-Roam 2
On January 12, 2023, you requested to review a draft of the reinitiated biological opinion.

You also granted permission for CDFW to review the draft.

On February 6, 2023, we provided the draft of the reinitiated biological opinion to the Corps and CDFW for their review. We received comments on the draft biological opinion from CDFW on February 22, 2023.

On March 30, 2023, you agreed to May 3, 2023 as the due date for the reinitiated biological opinion.

BIOLOGICAL OPINION

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
The Corps proposes to authorize the City of Salinas’ Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project. The City plans to widen East Boronda Road from Dartmouth Way to approximately 1,300 feet east of Natividad Road, from two lanes to four lanes, including roundabouts at major intersections. The widening would occur along the northern edge of the existing road in areas that are under active agricultural cultivation. The City would relocate an existing drainage ditch, which currently extends from east of Dartmouth Way to west of Natividad Road, approximately 100 feet to the north to accommodate the road widening. The project will result in 40.06 acres of disturbance, of which 16.11 acres are currently developed paved roadways.

The City would widen the road in two phases. Phase 1 would include widening East Boronda Road from east of Dartmouth Way to approximately 1,200 feet east of McKinnon Street, including construction of a new roundabout at the intersection. It would require relocating an agricultural drainage ditch 100 feet north. Phase 1 would result in 2.36 acres of permanent impacts, and 3.17 acres of temporary impacts to undeveloped land. Phase 2 would be partitioned into phase 2a and phase 2b. Phase 2a would include widening Boronda Road from 1,200 feet east of McKinnon Street to 900 feet east of El Dorado Drive, including a roundabout at the intersection with El Dorado Drive. Phase 2a would result in 3.17 acres of permanent impacts and 5.24 acres of temporary impacts to undeveloped land. Phase 2b would include the widening of Boronda Road from 900 feet east of El Dorado Drive to 1,300 feet east of Natividad Road, including a roundabout at the intersection with Natividad Road.

Phase 2b would result in 4.85 acres of permanent impacts and 5.16 acres of temporary impacts to undeveloped land.

The applicant would stage equipment and materials along both sides of McKinnon Street north of the intersection with East Boronda Road. The stockpiled construction materials within staging areas would include excavated soils, aggregate base, pipes, rebar, and signs. The City also proposes to create bike and shoulder lanes, bus pullouts, and sidewalks, which include cut and fill, and asphalt work. Lastly, landscaping would include planting of native and noninvasive plants. Construction for this project would continue intermittently until 2026.

Frances Malamud-Roam 3
Conservation Measures
The Corps and the City propose to implement the following measures to minimize effects to California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders:

1. At least 80 days prior to project activities, the City will submit to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) the name, qualifications, business address, contact information, and references with contact information of the biologist(s) (and designated monitor(s), if applicable) who will conduct activities for California tiger salamander specified in the following measures. The City will ensure that the biologist(s) are knowledgeable and experienced in the biology, natural history, and collecting and handling of California tiger salamander, as well as excavating burrows and crevices to minimize mortality and monitoring construction activities. The City has the option of using designated monitors to assist the biologist(s) in compliance monitoring under direction or supervision of the biologist(s). The City will ensure that the designated monitor(s) are knowledgeable and experienced in the biology and natural history of California tiger salamander, and monitoring construction activities.

Designated monitor responsibilities will be restricted to a specific set of measures, specified by the City at the time their qualifications are submitted for review.

Following CDFW approval of the biologist(s) and designated monitor(s), the City will submit the qualifications, business address, contact information, references with contact information, and documentation of CDFW approval of the biologist(s) to the Service for approval. No project activities will begin until the City has received written approval from the Service and CDFW that the project biologist(s) are approved to conduct the work for California tiger salamander. The City will obtain written approval from the Service and CDFW if the biologist(s) or designated monitor(s) must be changed (EMC Planning Group Inc. 2020, pp 4-2 through 4-5).

2. At least 30 days prior to ground disturbance, the City will submit to the Service the name, qualifications, business address, contact information, and references with contact information of the biologist(s) who will conduct activities for California redlegged frog specified in the following measures. No project activities will begin until the City has received written approval from the Service that the project biologist(s) are approved to conduct the work. The City will obtain written approval from the Service if the biologist(s) must be changed.

3. The Service-approved (and CDFW-approved) biologist(s) for California tiger salamander will prepare a Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan in consultation with CDFW for California tiger salamander and submit it to CDFW for review and approval a minimum of 30 days prior to the beginning of project activities. The Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan for California tiger salamander will include, but not be limited to, a map of all areas where project activities will occur (hereafter project areas) and a discussion of the portion(s) on the map which represent potential upland habitat; identification of the areas on the map within 1.3 miles of known or potential breeding habitat for California tiger salamander; detailed survey, Frances Malamud-Roam 4
excavation, capture, handling, and relocation methods; identification of relocation areas; and identification of a wildlife rehabilitation center or veterinary facility capable of treating injured wild amphibians. Project activities may not proceed until the Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan for California tiger salamander is approved in writing by CDFW. The City will provide a courtesy copy of the approved plan to the Service. The designated monitor(s) are prohibited from capturing and handling California tiger salamander (and California red-legged frog) unless specifically approved in writing by the Service and under the direct supervision of the Service-approved (and CDFW-approved) biologist(s) for California tiger salamander (or the Service-approved biologist(s) for California redlegged frog). Any proposed changes to the CDFW-approved Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan for California tiger salamander will be submitted in writing to CDFW and approved by CDFW in writing prior to implementation of any proposed modifications to the Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan for California tiger salamander. The City will provide a courtesy copy of any CDFW-approved changes to the Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan for California tiger salamander to the Service.

4. The Service-approved biologist(s) will supervise the implementation of all species protection measures. Construction personnel will attend a training session regarding the protection measures, as described below:
a. Before construction activities begin, the Service-approved biologist(s) will conduct a worker environmental awareness training session for all construction personnel. The training will include a description of protected biological resources, species descriptions and habitat requirements, and general measures being implemented to protect sensitive resources during construction.

Informational handouts with photographs clearly illustrating species appearances will be used in the training session.
b. Training topics will include special-status species that may be present during the project, including California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander.
c. The training session will include information regarding steps to take if a special status species is observed, including contact information for the biological monitoring staff and measures to protect species during construction. All new construction personnel will undergo this mandatory worker environmental awareness training when they begin working on the project. Training will occur prior to the start of construction and periodically as needed if new construction personnel begin work on the project. The City will provide interpretation for all non-English speaking construction personnel.

Upon completion of the training, construction personnel will sign a form stating that they attended the training and understand all species protection measures.

Frances Malamud-Roam 5
The training will be repeated at least once annually for long-term or permanent employees that will be conducting project activities.

5. The Service-approved biologist(s) and designated monitor(s) will maintain constructionmonitoring documentation onsite in either hard copy or digital format throughout the construction period, which will include a copy of this biological opinion and a list of signatures of all construction personnel who have successfully completed the worker environmental awareness training. The City will ensure a copy of the constructionmonitoring documentation is available for review.

6. The Service-approved biologist(s) and designated monitor(s) will have the authority to halt work that may affect listed amphibians at any time to prevent take of California redlegged frogs or California tiger salamanders. Work will re-commence only when authorized by the Service-approved biologist(s).

7. No more than 14 calendar days prior to initiating project activities within the project area, the Service-approved biologist(s) for California tiger salamander will survey the project area for California tiger salamanders. These surveys will provide 100 percent visual coverage (including burrow and crevice openings) within the project area as well as a 50-foot buffer zone around the project area, with the exception that areas outside of the City’s access or control need not be surveyed. If California tiger salamanders are found, the Service-approved biologist(s) for California tiger salamander will relocate them in accordance with the CDFW-approved Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan for California tiger salamander. The City will provide the survey results to CDFW in a written report prior to the beginning of project activities and will provide a courtesy copy of this written report to the Service.

8. During pre-activity clearance surveys (Measure #7), the Service-approved biologist(s) for California tiger salamander will flag all animal burrows and crevices suitable for California tiger salamander occupancy within the project area and a 50- foot buffer outside the project area, unless the buffer area is outside of City control.

An avoidance buffer of 50 feet or greater around animal burrows or crevices will be maintained regardless of whether the burrow or crevice is in the project area or solely within the project area’s 50-foot buffer zone. Flagged burrows or crevices which occur within 630 meters of known or potential breeding habitat, and which cannot be avoided by at least 50 feet will be fully excavated (Measure #9).

9. Prior to initiating ground-disturbing project activities within the project area, animal burrows and crevices identified during the pre-activity clearance surveys (Measure #7) and flagged (Measure #8) within 630 meters of known or potential California tiger salamander breeding habitat as identified in the CDFW-approved Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan for California tiger salamander, and which cannot be fully avoided by at least 50 feet, will be fully excavated. Applicable burrows and crevices may be excavated by hand or in a manner otherwise approved by the Service in accordance with the CDFW-approved Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan for Frances Malamud-Roam 6
California tiger salamander. Burrow and crevice excavation will occur under the direct supervision of the Service-approved biologist(s) for California tiger salamander.

Animal burrows and crevices identified outside of the project area, but within the project area’s 50-foot buffer zone, will be similarly excavated if they lie within 50 feet of ground-disturbing project activities occurring within the project area. Burrows and crevices outside of the City’s access or control do not need to be excavated. The Service-approved biologist(s) for California tiger salamander will relocate any live California tiger salamander discovered during burrow and crevice excavation in accordance with the CDFW-approved Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan for California tiger salamander. Excavation will occur no more than 14 days after the completion of the pre-activity clearance surveys.

10. A Service-approved biologist will survey the project site no more than 48 hours before the onset of work activities. If any California red-legged frogs are found and these individuals are likely to be killed or injured by work activities, the approved biologist will be allowed sufficient time to move them from the site before work begins. The Service-approved biologist will relocate the California red-legged frogs the shortest distance possible to a location that contains suitable habitat and that will not be affected by activities associated with the proposed project. The relocation site should be in the same drainage to the extent practicable. The project proponent will coordinate with the Service on the relocation site prior to the capture of any California red-legged frogs.

11. A Service-approved biologist will be present at the work site until all California redlegged frogs have been relocated out of harm’s way, workers have been instructed, and disturbance of habitat has been completed. After this time, the City may designate a person to monitor on-site compliance with all minimization measures. The Serviceapproved biologist will ensure that this monitor receives the training outlined in measure 4 above and in the identification of California red-legged frogs. If the monitor or the Service-approved biologist recommends that work be stopped because California red-legged frogs would be affected in a manner not anticipated by the City or the Service during review of the proposed action, they will notify a project supervisor immediately. The project supervisor will either resolve the situation by eliminating the adverse effect immediately or require that all actions causing these effects be halted. If work is stopped, the Service will be notified as soon as possible.

Prior to the initiation of project activities and following surveying (Measure #7), flagging (Measure #8), and excavating burrows and crevices (Measure #9), the City will fence access routes and the project perimeter to prevent California red-legged frogs or California tiger salamanders from entering areas where project activities occur. The exclusion fence will consist of a 3-foot wall of 0.25-inch mesh. The exclusion fence will be installed under the direct supervision of the Service-approved (and CDFW-approved) biologist(s) for California tiger salamander and begin no later than 48 hours after the burrow and crevice excavation and relocation activities, where applicable, are complete. The City will also avoid animal burrows and crevices by 50 feet during the installation of the exclusion fence in accordance with Measures #7, #8, Frances Malamud-Roam 7
and #9. The exclusion fence will be supported sufficiently to maintain its integrity under all conditions, such as wind and heavy rain, for the duration that it is in place.

The Service-approved biologist(s) or designated monitor(s) will inspect the fence weekly for holes and tears that could allow frogs or salamanders to pass. Holes or tears will be repaired within 24 hours of discovery. The fence and the site will be inspected after significant rain events to ensure that no frogs or salamanders are sheltering along the fence or attempting to walk around it. If California red-legged frogs or California tiger salamanders are observed, the Service-approved biologist(s) will contact the Service immediately to determine the best course of action. At a minimum, all project activities within 100 feet of the animal will cease until it leaves the project area. The City will remove exclusion fencing immediately upon completion of project activities in the fenced project area.

12. The Service-approved biologist(s) will be present on-site daily until pre-activity clearance surveys (Measure #7), flagging (Measure #8), burrow excavation and relocation (Measure #9), exclusion fence installation (Measure #12), worker environmental awareness training (Measure #4), and all initial ground disturbance activities are complete. The Service-approved biologist(s) will be on site for the duration of the day when these project activities occur and conduct at least daily compliance inspections. During periods of inactivity and after clearing, grubbing, and initial ground disturbance are complete, the Service-approved biologist(s) and/or designated monitor(s) will conduct at least weekly compliance inspections.

Compliance inspections will include minimizing incidental take of California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog; preventing unlawful take of California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog; checking for compliance with all measures of this biological opinion; checking all exclusion zones; and ensuring that signs, stakes, and fencing are intact, and that project activities are only occurring in the project area. The Service-approved biologist(s) and designated monitor(s) will conduct biological construction monitoring in all project areas with potential to impact California red-legged frogs or California tiger salamanders. The Serviceapproved biologist(s) and designated monitor(s) will prepare written observation and inspection records for each day they are on site, summarizing oversight activities and compliance inspections, observations of California tiger salamander and their sign, survey results, and monitoring activities.

13. The Service-approved biologist(s) for California tiger salamander will maintain a record of California tiger salamanders handled and all documented observations of California tiger salamander. This information will include for each animal: (1) date, time, and location (Global Positioning System coordinates and maps) of capture or observation as well as release, if applicable; (2) the name of the party that identified the California tiger salamander; (3) circumstances of the incident; (4) the general condition and health, noting all visible conditions including gait and behavior, ectoparasites, injuries, etc.; (5) any diagnostic markings, sex, age (juvenile or adult); (6) actions undertaken; (7) habitat description; and (8) ambient temperature when handled and released or observed. The Service-approved biologist(s) for California Frances Malamud-Roam 8
tiger salamander will also submit this information to the California Natural Diversity Database. The Service-approved biologist(s) for California tiger salamander will prepare a relocation summary and include it in the biological monitoring reports.

14. Within active construction zones that are fenced, workers will check for wildlife under vehicles and equipment before they are moved. Workers will thoroughly inspect all construction pipes, culverts, or other similar structures with a diameter of one inch or greater that are stored for one or more overnight periods for California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog before the object is subsequently moved, buried, or capped. Workers will check all excavated steep-walled holes or trenches greater than one foot deep for trapped animals. To prevent inadvertent entrapment of California tiger salamander or California red-legged frog, all open trenches, holes, sumps, and other excavations with sidewalls steeper than a 1:1 (45 degree) slope will have an escape ramp of earth or a non-slip material with a less than 1:1 (45 degree) slope. At the end of each workday, construction personnel will ensure all trenches, holes, sumps, or other excavations with sidewalls steeper than a 1:1 (45 degree) slope of any depth are covered with barrier material (e.g., hardware cloth) such that animals are unable to dig or squeeze under the barrier and become entrapped. The outer two feet of excavation cover will conform to solid ground so that gaps do not occur between the cover and the ground, and the excavation cover will be secured with soil staples or by similar means to prevent gaps. Construction personnel will also thoroughly inspect all open trenches, holes, sumps, or other excavations for California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog before they are backfilled. If California red-legged frogs or California tiger salamanders are observed within an active construction zone, the Service-approved biologist(s) will be notified immediately and all work within 100 feet of the individual animal will be halted and all equipment turned off until the Service-approved biologist(s) have captured and relocated the California red-legged frog from the project area or the Service-approved biologist(s) have captured and relocated the California tiger salamander from the project area. The California red-legged frog or California tiger salamander will be relocated to an approved off-site location according to the CDFWapproved Mortality Reduction and Relocation Plan for California tiger salamander or at the direction of the Service-approved biologist(s) for California red-legged frog.

The City will notify the Corps and the Service and halt construction if California redlegged frog eggs or tadpoles, or California tiger salamanders eggs or larva are detected during pre-construction surveys or project activities.

15. Initial site clearing and grading will be conducted and completed only during the dry season, from April 15 to November 15. The Service-approved biologist(s) and the City will monitor the National Weather Service 72-hour forecast for the project area at the following web address: www.weather.gov. During rainfall events or when a 50 percent or greater chance of rainfall is predicted within 72 hours, the City will cease all project activities in the project area where initial ground disturbance (vegetation removal, grading, grubbing, and excavation) has yet to occur until the rainfall ceases and a zero percent chance of rain is forecast. Project activities may continue during Frances Malamud-Roam 9
rainfall events or when a 50 percent or greater chance of rain is forecast within portions of the project area that have already undergone pre-activity clearance surveys (Measure #7), flagging (Measure #8), and burrow excavation (Measure #9), and which are surrounded by exclusion fence that has been properly maintained and is in good repair.

16. The City will appropriately protect stockpiles to prevent soil erosion. The City will stockpile and stage all materials and equipment in a manner that discourages California tiger salamander or California red-legged frog use. In all locations, the City will not place bundled or loose materials directly on the ground. These materials will be elevated to discourage use by California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog. The City will not place materials outside of exclusion fencing.

17. A designated representative will be appointed by the City who will be the contact for any employee who may inadvertently kill or injure a special-status species or find one dead, injured, or trapped, in addition to the Service-approved biologist(s). The designated representative will be legally responsible to notify the Service-approved biologist(s) and the Service immediately in the event that take of any special-status wildlife species occurs. The designated representative will be identified during the Employee Education Program and his or her contact information will be provided to the Service.

18. The designated representative or the Service-approved biologist(s) will compile daily observation and inspection records into quarterly biological monitoring reports.

Quarterly biological monitoring reports will include a summary of all pre-activity surveys and compliance monitoring conducted during the previous quarter; the project activities that occurred during the previous quarter; and an accounting of the number of acres that have been permanently and temporarily disturbed by the project within the project area, both for the prior quarter, and the total since issuance of the biological opinion, if applicable. Quarterly biological monitoring reports will be submitted to the City providing documentation that these measures have been implemented. These reports will be used to help inform the reporting requirement per this biological opinion.

19. Due to the potential for wildlife entanglement, the contractor will avoid the use of monofilament netting in erosion control materials (fiber rolls and blankets).

20. All food-related and other trash will be disposed of in animal-proof containers and removed from the project area at least once a week during the construction period or more often if trash is attracting avian or mammalian predators. Construction personnel will not feed or otherwise attract wildlife to the area.

21. The Service-approved biologist(s) will remove non-native aquatic animals such as bullfrogs and crayfish which may prey on California red-legged frogs and other native species whenever these are detected during surveys.

Frances Malamud-Roam 10

22. The City will send quarterly biological monitoring reports, as detailed in Measures #14 and #19, to CDFW by January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30 with a courtesy copy to the Service. The City will send a courtesy copy of the annual report, as detailed in the Reporting Requirements of the biological opinion (see pages 29-30) to CDFW. The annual report for the biological opinion may suffice for the January 30 quarterly report to CDFW so long as the report covers the months of October-December of the previous year. Additionally, in the event that a dead or injured California tiger salamander is found during project activities, the City will send a courtesy copy of the notification, as described in the incidental take statement of this biological opinion (page 30) to CDFW. All reports sent to CDFW should be sent to the following address: [email protected].

Mitigation for Loss of Habitat
The City will compensate for the permanent loss of upland California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander habitat. The City will purchase credits from Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank at a minimum 2:1 ratio of area preserved to area impacted. The City will secure compensatory mitigation for each phase of the project in advance of beginning each phase. Prior to Phase 1, the City will purchase 4.72 credits; prior to Phase 2a, the City will purchase 6.34 credits; and prior to Phase 2b, the City will purchase 9.7 credits. The City will submit to the Service and CDFW a copy of the Bill of Sale(s) and Payment Receipt prior to each phase of the project.

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE JEOPARDY DETERMINATION
Jeopardy Determination
Section 7(a)(2) of the Act requires that Federal agencies ensure that any action they authorize, fund, or carry out is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species. “Jeopardize the continued existence of” means “to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species” (50 CFR 402.02).

The jeopardy analysis in this biological opinion relies on four components: (1) the Status of the Species, which describes the rangewide condition of the California tiger salamander and the California red-legged frog, the factors responsible for that condition, and their survival and recovery needs; (2) the Environmental Baseline, which analyzes the condition of the California tiger salamander and the California red-legged frog in the action area, the factors responsible for that condition, and the relationship of the action area to the survival and recovery of the California tiger salamander and the California red-legged frog; (3) the Effects of the Action, which determines all consequences to the California tiger salamander and the California red-legged frog caused by the proposed action that are reasonably certain to occur; and (4) the Cumulative Effects, which evaluates the effects of future, non-Federal activities, Frances Malamud-Roam 11
that are reasonably certain to occur in the action area, on the California tiger salamander and the California red-legged frog.

In accordance with policy and regulation, the jeopardy determination is made by evaluating the effects of the proposed Federal action in the context of the current status of the California tiger salamander and the California red-legged frog, taking into account any cumulative effects, to determine if implementation of the proposed action is likely to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of the California tiger salamander and the California red-legged frog in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, and distribution of those species.

STATUS OF THE SPECIES
California Red-legged Frog
Legal Status
The California red-legged frog was federally listed as threatened on May 23, 1996 (61 Federal Register (FR) 25813). Revised critical habitat for the California red-legged frog was designated on March 17, 2010 (75 FR 12816, Service 2010). The Service issued a recovery plan for the species on May 28, 2002 (Service 2002).

Natural History
California red-legged frogs use a variety of habitat types ranging from sea level to approximately 5,000 feet elevation, including aquatic systems, riparian, and upland habitats.

Individual California red-legged frogs may use the environment in varying ways, for example, an individual may complete their entire life cycle in a particular habitat without using other components (i.e., a pond is suitable for each life stage and use of upland habitat or a riparian corridor is not necessary). However, populations appear to persist where a mosaic of habitat elements exists, embedded within a matrix of dispersal habitat. Adults are often associated with dense, shrubby riparian or emergent vegetation and areas with deep (greater than 1.6 feet) still or slow-moving water; the largest summer densities of California red-legged frogs are associated with deep-water pools with dense stands of overhanging willows (Salix spp.) and an intermixed fringe of cattails (Typha latifolia) (Hayes and Jennings 1988, p. 147).

California red-legged frogs can breed in both natural and anthropogenic aquatic habitats; tadpoles, juveniles, and adult frogs have been collected from streams, creeks, ponds, marshes, deep riverine pools and backwaters within streams and creeks, dune ponds, lagoons, estuaries, and artificial impoundments such as stock ponds. Important factors influencing the suitability of aquatic breeding sites are the general lack of invasive aquatic predators, sufficient hydroperiod, percent emergent vegetation, and topography. Accessibility to upland sheltering habitat is essential for the survival of California red-legged frogs within a watershed and can be a factor limiting population numbers and distribution.

Frances Malamud-Roam 12
California red-legged frogs are “irruptive” breeders where their breeding capacity is highly dependent on local environmental conditions, specifically the availability of cool water for egg deposition and larval maturation (Jennings and Hayes 1994, p. 62). California red-legged frogs breed from November to May and breeding activity typically begins earlier at southern coastal than northern coastal localities (Storer 1925, p. 2; Alvarez et al. 2013, pp. 547–548). Breeding may start as late as March or April in Sierra Nevada localities, due to low temperatures at these sites in January and February (Tatarian 2008, p. 16). Breeding in southern California localities may start as late as April, as exemplified in Matilija Canyon following the 2017 Thomas Fire (Patrick Lieske, U.S. Forest Service, in litt. 2021). High water flows in the winter and spring also can delay breeding in streams and rivers (Fellers et al. 2001, p. 157).

Female California red-legged frogs lay only one egg mass in a breeding year and each egg mass contains between 300 to 4,000 eggs (Storer 1925, p. 240). Frogs typically deposit egg masses in relatively willow water (approximately 1.6 to 2 feet deep) on emergent vegetation within 4 feet of shore (Storer 1925, p. 239, Jennings and Hayes 1994, p. 64). However, the species can deposit eggs on a wide variety of substrates including boulders and cobbled substrate and submerged tips of overhanging branches, and egg masses have been documented 39 feet from shore and in water up to 10.5 feet deep (Alvarez et al. 2013, pp. 544-545; Wilcox et al. 2017, p. 68). California red-legged frog tadpoles hatch from egg masses after 6 to14 days (Storer 1925, p. 241). Tadpole development and growth rates are variable and likely temperature dependent (Fellers 2005, pp. 552-554). Occasionally, tadpoles may overwinter and then metamorphose the following spring, a phenomenon so far observed in Santa Clara, Marin, Contra Costa, and San Luis Obispo Counties (Fellers et al. 2001, entire). The juvenile California red-legged frog life stage is defined as the time after an individual undergoes metamorphosis (when they lose their tails and become small froglets) which typically occurs four to five months after hatching and it spans to when an individual is able to breed (Storer 1925, p. 241; Wright and Wright 1949, p. 422). On average, the juvenile life stage is from about five months of age to three years in California red-legged frogs. Immediately after metamorphosis, juveniles shelter near their natal pond. However, some juveniles may disperse in the fall to nearby moist uplands or different aquatic habitat to avoid predation by larger, older frogs. Hayes and Tennant (1985, p. 604) found juveniles to seek prey diurnally and nocturnally, whereas adults were largely nocturnal.

During periods of wet weather, starting with the first rains of fall, some individual California red-legged frogs may make long-distance overland excursions through upland habitats to reach breeding sites. In Santa Cruz County, Bulger et al. (2003, p. 90) found marked California redlegged frogs moving up to 1.74 miles through upland habitats, via point-to-point, straight-line migrations without regard to topography, rather than following riparian corridors. Most of these overland movements occurred at night and took up to 2 months. Similarly, in San Luis Obispo County, Rathbun and Schneider (2001, p. 1302) documented the movement of a male California red-legged frog between two ponds that were 1.78 miles apart in less than 32 days; however, most California red-legged frogs in the Bulger et al. (2003, p. 93) study were nonmigrating frogs and always remained within 426 feet of their aquatic site of residence (half of the frogs always stayed within 82 feet of water). Rathbun et al. (1993, p. 15) radio-tracked three California red-legged frogs near the coast in San Luis Obispo County at various times between Frances Malamud-Roam 13
July and January; these frogs also stayed close to water and never strayed more than 85 feet into upland vegetation. Scott (2002, p. 2) radio-tracked nine California red-legged frogs in East Las Virgenes Creek in Ventura County from January to June 2001, which remained relatively sedentary as well; the longest within-channel movement was 280 feet and the farthest movement away from the stream was 30 feet.

After breeding, California red-legged frogs often disperse from their breeding habitat to forage and seek suitable dry-season habitat. Cover within dry-season aquatic habitat could include boulders, downed trees, and logs; agricultural features such as drains, watering troughs, spring boxes, abandoned sheds, or hayricks, and industrial debris. California red-legged frogs use small mammal burrows and moist leaf litter (Rathbun et al. 1993, p. 15; Jennings and Hayes 1994, p. 64); incised stream channels with portions narrower and deeper than 18 inches may also provide habitat (Service 2002, p. 14). This type of dispersal and habitat use, however, is not observed in all California red-legged frogs and is most likely dependent on the year-to-year variations in climate and habitat suitability and varying requisites per life stage.

Although the presence of California red-legged frogs is correlated with still water deeper than approximately 1.6 feet, riparian shrubbery, and emergent vegetation (Jennings and Hayes 1994, p. 64), California red-legged frogs appear to be absent from numerous locations in its historical range where these elements are well represented. The cause of local extirpations does not appear to be restricted solely to loss of aquatic habitat. The most likely causes of local extirpation are thought to be changes in faunal composition of aquatic ecosystems (i.e., the introduction of invasive predators and competitors) and landscape-scale disturbances that disrupt California red-legged frog population processes, such as dispersal and colonization.

The introduction of contaminants or changes in water temperature may also play a role in local extirpations. These changes may also promote the spread of predators, competitors, invasive plants, parasites, and diseases.

Rangewide Status
The historical range of the California red-legged frog extended coastally from southern Mendocino County and inland from the vicinity of Redding, California, southward to northwestern Baja California, Mexico (Storer 1925, p. 235; Jennings and Hayes 1985, p. 95; Shaffer et al. 2004, p. 2673). The California red-legged frog has sustained a 70 percent reduction in its geographic range because of several factors acting singly or in combination (Davidson et al. 2001, p. 465).

Over-harvesting, habitat loss, non-native species introduction, and urban encroachment are the primary factors that have negatively affected the California red-legged frog throughout its range (Jennings and Hayes 1985, pp. 99-100; Hayes and Jennings 1988, p. 152). Habitat loss and degradation, combined with over-exploitation and introduction of exotic predators, were important factors in the decline of the California red-legged frog in the early to mid-1900s.

Continuing threats to the California red-legged frog include direct habitat loss due to stream alteration and loss of aquatic habitat, indirect effects of expanding urbanization, competition or predation from non-native species including the bullfrog, catfish (Ictalurus spp.), bass Frances Malamud-Roam 14
(Micropterus spp.), mosquito fish (Gambusia affinis), red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii), and signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus). Chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) is a waterborne fungus that can decimate amphibian populations, and is considered a threat to California red-legged frog populations.

Recovery
The 2002 final recovery plan for the California red-legged frog (Service 2002) states that the goal of recovery efforts is to reduce threats and improve the population status of the California red-legged frog sufficiently to warrant delisting. The recovery plan describes a strategy for delisting, which includes: (1) protecting known populations and reestablishing historical populations; (2) protecting suitable habitat, corridors, and core areas; (3) developing and implementing management plans for preserved habitat, occupied watersheds, and core areas; (4) developing land use guidelines; (5) gathering biological and ecological data necessary for conservation of the species; (6) monitoring existing populations and conducting surveys for new populations; and (7) establishing an outreach program. The California red-legged frog will be considered for delisting when:

1. Suitable habitats within all core areas are protected and/or managed for California redlegged frogs in perpetuity, and the ecological integrity of these areas is not threatened by adverse anthropogenic habitat modification (including indirect effects of upstream/downstream land uses).

2. Existing populations throughout the range are stable (i.e., reproductive rates allow for long-term viability without human intervention). Population status will be documented through establishment and implementation of a scientifically acceptable population monitoring program for at least a 15-year period, which is approximately 4 to 5 generations of the California red-legged frog. This 15-year period should coincide with an average precipitation cycle.

3. Populations are geographically distributed in a manner that allows for the continued existence of viable metapopulations despite fluctuations in the status of individual populations (i.e., when populations are stable or increasing at each core area).

4. The species is successfully reestablished in portions of its historical range such that at least one reestablished population is stable/increasing at each core area where California red-legged frog are currently absent.

5. The amount of additional habitat needed for population connectivity, recolonization, and dispersal has been determined, protected, and managed for California red-legged frogs.

The recovery plan identifies eight recovery units based on the assumption that various regional areas of the species’ range are essential to its survival and recovery. The recovery status of the California red-legged frog is considered within the smaller scale of recovery units as opposed Frances Malamud-Roam 15
to the overall range. These recovery units correspond to major watershed boundaries as defined by U.S. Geological Survey hydrologic units and the limits of the range of the California redlegged frog. The goal of the recovery plan is to protect the long-term viability of all extant populations within each recovery unit.

Within each recovery unit, core areas have been delineated and represent contiguous areas of moderate to high California red-legged frog densities that are relatively free of exotic species such as bullfrogs. The goal of designating core areas is to protect metapopulations that combined with suitable dispersal habitat, will support long-term viability within existing populations. This management strategy allows for the recolonization of habitat within and adjacent to core areas that are naturally subjected to periodic localized extinctions, thus assuring the long-term survival and recovery of the California red-legged frog.

California tiger salamander
Legal Status
The Service recognizes three distinct population segments (DPS) of the California tiger salamander: one in Sonoma County; one in northern Santa Barbara County; and one in central California. On September 21, 2000, the Service listed the Santa Barbara County distinct population segment of the California tiger salamander as endangered (65 FR 57241). On March 19, 2003, the Service listed the Sonoma County distinct population segment of the California tiger salamander as endangered (68 FR 13497). On August 4, 2004, the Service published a final rule listing the California tiger salamander as threatened range-wide, including the previously identified Sonoma and Santa Barbara distinct population segments (69 FR 47212). On August 19, 2005, U.S. District Judge William Alsup vacated the Service's downlisting of the Sonoma and Santa Barbara populations from endangered to threatened.

Thus, the Sonoma and Santa Barbara populations are listed as endangered, and the central California population is listed as threatened.

Life History
The California tiger salamander is a large and stocky terrestrial salamander with small eyes and a broad, rounded snout. Adults may reach a total length of 8.2 inches, with males generally averaging about 8 inches total length, and females averaging about 6.8 inches in total length.

For both sexes, the average snout-to-vent length is approximately 3.6 inches (65 FR 57241).

The small eyes have black irises and protrude from the head. Coloration consists of white or pale yellow spots or bars on a black background on the back and sides. The belly varies from almost uniform white or pale yellow to a variegated pattern of white or pale yellow and black.

Males can be distinguished from females, especially during the breeding season, by their swollen cloacae (a common chamber into which the intestinal, urinary, and reproductive canals discharge), larger tails, and larger overall size (Trenham 1998, p. 74).

California tiger salamanders spend the majority of their lives in upland habitats and cannot persist without them. The upland component of California tiger salamander habitat typically Frances Malamud-Roam 16
consists of grassland savannah, but also includes scrub or chaparral habitats (Shaffer et al. 1993, (50 CFR 47216). Juvenile and adult California tiger salamanders spend the dry summer and fall months of the year in the burrows of small mammals, such as California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus beecheyi) and Botta's pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) (Storer 1925, p. 70; Trenham 1998, p. 46).

Burrow habitat created by ground squirrels and utilized by California tiger salamanders suggests a commensal relationship between the two species (Loredo et al. 1996, p. 284).

Movement of California tiger salamanders within and among burrow systems continues for at least several months after juveniles and adults leave the ponds (Trenham 2001, p. 369).

California tiger salamanders cannot dig their own burrows, and as a result, their presence is associated with burrowing mammals. Active ground-burrowing rodent populations likely sustain California tiger salamanders because inactive burrow systems become progressively unsuitable over time (69 FR 47212, p. 32). Loredo et al. (1996, p. 284) found that California ground squirrel burrow systems collapsed within 18 months following abandonment by, or loss of, the mammals.

Breeding
Adults enter breeding ponds during fall and winter rains, typically from October through February (Trenham et al. 2000, p. 369). Males migrate to the breeding ponds before females (Loredo and Van Vuren 1996, p. 895). Males usually remain in the ponds for an average of about 6 to 8 weeks, while females stay for approximately 1 to 2 weeks. In dry years, both sexes may stay for shorter periods (Loredo and Van Vuren 1996, pp. 897-899).

Females attach their eggs singly or, in rare circumstances, in groups of two to four, to twigs, grass stems, vegetation, or debris in the water (Storer 1925, p. 66; Twitty 1941, pp. 1-4). In ponds with little or no vegetation, females may attach eggs to objects, such as rocks and boards on the bottom. In drought years, the seasonal pools may not form and the adults may not breed (Barry and Shaffer 1994, pp. 159-164). The eggs hatch in 10 to 14 days with newly hatched salamanders (larvae) ranging in size from 0.5 to 0.6 inch in total length (65 FR 57241). The larvae are aquatic. Each is yellowish gray in color and has a broad, plump head; large, feathery external gills; and broad dorsal fins that extend well onto its back. The larvae feed on zooplankton, small crustaceans, and aquatic insects for about 6 weeks after hatching, after which they switch to larger prey (Anderson 1968, pp. 273-284). Larger larvae have been known to consume smaller tadpoles of tree frogs (Pseudacris spp.) and California red-legged frogs (Rana draytonii). California tiger salamander larvae are among the top aquatic predators in seasonal pool ecosystems.

The larval stage of the California tiger salamander usually lasts 3 to 6 months, because most seasonal ponds and pools dry up during the summer (Petranka 1998, p. 48). Amphibian larvae must grow to a critical minimum body size before they can metamorphose to the terrestrial stage (Wilbur and Collins 1973, pp. 1305-1314). Larvae collected near Stockton in the Central Valley during April varied from 1.9 to 2.3 inches in length (Storer 1925, p. 85). Feaver (1971, p. 51) found that larvae metamorphosed and left the breeding pools 60 to 74 days after the eggs Frances Malamud-Roam 17
had been laid, with larvae developing faster in smaller, more rapidly drying pools. The longer the inundation period, the larger the larvae and metamorphosed juveniles are able to grow, and the more likely they are to survive and reproduce (Semlitsch et al. 1988, p. 189). The larvae perish if a site dries before they complete metamorphosis. Pechmann et al. (2001) found a strong positive correlation between inundation period and total number of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians, including tiger salamanders (50 CFR 47215).

Metamorphosed juveniles leave the breeding sites in the late spring or early summer. Like the adults, juveniles may emerge from these retreats to feed during nights of high relative humidity (Shaffer et al. 1993 p. 5) before settling in their selected upland sites for the dry, hot summer months. While most California tiger salamanders rely on rodent burrows for shelter, some individuals may utilize soil crevices as temporary shelter during upland migrations (Loredo et al. 1996, p. 284). Mortality of juveniles during their first summer exceeds 50 percent (Trenham 1998, p. 18). Emergence from upland habitat in hot, dry weather occasionally results in mass mortality of juveniles (Holland 1990, p. 219).

Lifetime reproductive success for California tiger salamanders is typically low. Less than 50 percent breed more than once (Trenham 2000, p. 365). In part, this is due to the extended length of time it takes for California tiger salamanders to reach sexual maturity; most do not breed until 4 or 5 years of age. Combined with low survivorship of metamorphs (in some populations, less than 5 percent of marked juveniles survive to become breeding adults (Trenham 1998, p. iv), low reproductive success limits California tiger salamander populations.

Because of this low recruitment, isolated subpopulations can decline greatly from unusual, randomly occurring natural events as well as from human-caused factors that reduce breeding success and individual survival. Based on metapopulation theory (Hanski and Gilpin 1991), factors that repeatedly lower breeding success in isolated ponds that are too far from other ponds for dispersing individuals to replenish the population further threaten the survival of a local population.

Rangewide Status
The central California tiger salamander is endemic to the grassland community found in California’s Central Valley, the surrounding foothills, and coastal valleys (Fisher and Shaffer 1996, p. 1390). The distribution of breeding locations of this species, and the other two distinct populations, does not naturally overlap with that of any other species of tiger salamander (Petranka 1998, p. 47; Stebbins 2003, p. 469).

California tiger salamanders have been found in upland habitats various distances from aquatic breeding habitats. During a mark and recapture study in the Upper Carmel River Valley in Monterey County, Trenham et al. (2000, p. 3526) observed California tiger salamanders dispersing up to 2,200 feet between breeding ponds between years. In research at Olcott Lake in Solano County, Trenham and Shaffer (2005, p. 1160) captured California tiger salamanders in traps installed 1,312 feet from the breeding pond. In a trapping study in Contra Costa County (Orloff 2011, p. 266), most California tiger salamanders were trapped at least 2,600 feet Frances Malamud-Roam 18
from the nearest breeding pond and some were captured as far as 7,200 feet from the nearest breeding pond.

Historically, natural ephemeral vernal pools were the primary breeding habitats for California tiger salamanders (Trenham 2001, p. 3). However, with the conversion and loss of many vernal pools through farmland conversion and urban and suburban development, ephemeral and permanent ponds that have been created for livestock watering are now frequently used by the species (Robins and Vollmar 2002, p. 406).

The California tiger salamander is threatened primarily by the destruction, degradation, and fragmentation of upland and aquatic habitats, primarily resulting from the conversion of these habitats by urban, commercial, and intensive agricultural activities. Additional threats to the species include hybridization with introduced nonnative barred tiger salamanders (A. tigrinum mavortium), destructive rodent-control techniques (e.g., deep-ripping of burrow areas, use of fumigants), reduced survival due to the presence of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) (Leyse and Lawler 2000, p. 76), and mortality on roads due to vehicles. Disease, particularly chytridiomycosis and ranaviruses, and the spread of disease by nonnative amphibians, are discussed in the listing rule as additional threats to the species.

We do not have data regarding the absolute number of California tiger salamanders due to the fact that they spend most of their lives underground. Virtually nothing is known concerning the historical abundance of the species. At one study site in Monterey County, Trenham et al. (2000, p. 369) found the number of breeding adults visiting a pond varied from 57 to 244 individuals. A Contra Costa County breeding site, approximately 124 miles north of the Trenham et al. (2000) study site in Monterey County, showed a similar pattern of variation, suggesting that such fluctuations are typical (Loredo and Van Vuren 1996, p. 896). At the local landscape level, nearby breeding ponds can vary by at least an order of magnitude in the number of individuals visiting a pond, and these differences appear to be stable across years (Trenham et al. 2001).

Recovery
The strategy of the Recovery Plan for the Central California Distinct Population Segment of the California Tiger Salamander (Service 2017, p. iv) focuses on alleviating the threat of habitat loss and fragmentation in order to increase population resiliency (ensure each population is sufficiently large to withstand stochastic events), redundancy (ensure a sufficient number of populations to provide a margin of safety for the species to withstand catastrophic events), and representation (conserve the breadth of the genetic makeup of the species to conserve its adaptive capabilities). Recovery of this species can be achieved by addressing the conservation of remaining aquatic and upland habitat that provides essential connectivity, reduces fragmentation, and sufficiently buffers against encroaching development and intensive agricultural land uses.

Appropriate management of these areas will also reduce mortality by addressing non-habitat related threats, including those from non-native and hybrid tiger salamanders, other non-native Frances Malamud-Roam 19
species, contaminants, disease, and road mortality. Research and monitoring should be undertaken to determine the extent of known threats, identify new threats, and reduce threats to the extent possible.

The recovery strategy is intended to establish healthy, self-sustaining populations of Central California tiger salamanders through the protection and management of upland and aquatic breeding habitat, as well as the restoration of aquatic breeding habitat where necessary. It also ensures habitat management and monitoring and the conducting of research. Due to shifting conditions in the ecosystem (e.g., invasive species, unforeseen disease, climate change, and effects from future development and conversion to agriculture), the Service anticipates the need to adapt actions that implement this strategy over time. The recovery strategy ensures that the genetic diversity of the Central California tiger salamander is preserved throughout the DPS to allow adaptation to local environments, maintenance of evolutionary potential for adaptation to future stresses, and reduction in the potential for genetic drift and inbreeding to result in inbreeding depression.

The range of the Central California tiger salamander has been classified into four recovery units (Service 2017, p. II-1). These recovery units are not regulatory in nature; the boundaries of the recovery units do not identify individual properties that require protection, but they are described solely to facilitate recovery and management decisions. The recovery units represent both the potential extent of Central California tiger salamander habitat within the species’ range and the biologically (genetically) distinct areas where recovery actions should take place that will eliminate or ameliorate threats. All recovery units must be recovered to achieve recovery of the DPS.

The four recovery units have been further subdivided into Management Units. These subdivisions of recovery units are areas that might require different management, that might be managed by different entities, or that might encompass different populations. In the recovery plan, the management units are primarily administrative in that they serve to organize the recovery units into separate and approximately equal areas that will assist in managing the implementation of the recovery actions.

ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE
The implementing regulations for section 7(a)(2) (50 CFR 402.02) define the environmental baseline as “the condition of the listed species or its designated critical habitat in the action area, without the consequences to the listed species or designated critical habitat caused by the proposed action. The environmental baseline includes the past and present effects of all Federal, State, or private actions and other human activities in the action area, the anticipated effects of all proposed Federal projects in the action area that have already undergone formal or early section 7 consultation, and the effect of State or private actions which are contemporaneous with the consultation in process. The consequences to listed species or designated critical habitat from ongoing agency activities or existing agency facilities that are not within the agency’s discretion to modify are part of the environmental baseline.” Frances Malamud-Roam 20
Action Area
The implementing regulations for section 7(a)(2) of the Act (50 CFR 402.02) define the “action area” as all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action and not merely the immediate area involved in the action. The action area for this biological opinion includes all areas disturbed by project activities of phase 1, phase 2a, and phase 2b, as shown in the Project Habitat Impacts (City 2022). The action area occurs within an approximately 40.06-acre area and includes all adjacent uplands within a 500-foot buffer of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. in the immediate vicinity that may be directly or indirectly affected by implementation of the project.

Habitat Characteristics of the Action Area
The action area contains 0.12 acre of agricultural and roadside drainage ditches. These ditches are regularly mechanically disturbed, and possibly sprayed with herbicide. In the ditches near culverts at McKinnon Street and near McKinnon School, some aquatic vegetation was present during surveys, but the vegetation is regularly removed. The ditches provide moist refugia for California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders, but do not provide potential breeding habitat, because they lack a natural hydroperiod or ponding, contain only flowing agricultural runoff, and are regularly disturbed to remove vegetation. There are small mammal burrows along the drainage ditches which may provide aestivation or sheltering habitat. Several burrows are present near the McKinnon Street intake culvert, as well as along East Boronda Road to the west of Natividad Road. The action area contains active farmland which constitutes low-quality upland habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander. In most areas within the action area, only sparse ruderal vegetation such as nonnative cheeseweed (Malva parviflora), flax-leaved horseweed (Erigeron bonariensis), purslane (Portulaca oleracea), and bur-clover (Medicago polymorpha) occurs. The remaining portion of the action area is paved road bordered by a dense urban area to the south and does not provide habitat for the listed amphibians.

Previous Consultations in the Action Area
To our knowledge there have been no previous consultations in the action area.

Condition (Status) of the Species in the Action Area
California Red-legged Frog and California Tiger Salamander Neither California red-legged frogs nor California tiger salamanders have been observed within the action area. However, biologists observed six occurrences of California tiger salamanders within 3.1 miles of the action area, some of which contain salamanders that are hybridized with nonnative salamanders (CNDDB 2021). Within one mile of the action area, biologists observed one California red-legged frog in 2021 (CNDDB 2021) and eight California red-legged frog adults and one metamorph between 2002 and 2004 (EMC Planning Group Inc. 2020). Due to the proximity of these observations, it is possible for California red-legged frogs and California Frances Malamud-Roam 21
tiger salamanders to be present in the action area. Both species may disperse through the action area or use the drainage ditches as wet refugia. Both species may use the small mammal burrows for shelter, and California tiger salamanders may use the burrows for aestivation.

Recovery
California Red-legged Frog
The action area is within the Diablo Range and Salinas Valley Recovery Unit, described in the recovery plan for the California red-legged frog (Service 2002, 49 pp.). Threats to California red-legged frogs in the Diablo Range and Salinas Valley Recovery Unit include agriculture, livestock, mining, non-native species, recreation, urbanization, and water management activities and structures including diversions and reservoirs. The species’ recovery status at the time the recovery plan was published was listed as medium.

California Tiger Salamander
The action area is within the Central Coast Range Recovery Unit. Some habitat protection has occurred within this recovery unit; however, most populations are not protected and have not been monitored for population status, trends, and threats. The primary threat to populations within this recovery unit is hybridization with nonnative tiger salamanders. Maintaining the native genetic integrity of central California tiger salamanders within this recovery unit is a priority.

EFFECTS OF THE ACTION
The implementing regulations for section 7(a)(2) define effects of the action as “all consequences to listed species or critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action if it would not occur but for the proposed action and it is reasonably certain to occur. Effects of the action may occur later in time and may include consequences occurring outside the immediate area involved in the action” (50 CFR 402.02).

Effects of the Proposed Action on the California Red-legged Frog and California Tiger Salamander
Project activities would directly affect California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders within the action area. However, effects to California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders would be reduced with the implementation of the proposed conservation measures. Injury or mortality could occur from animals being crushed by heavy equipment, vehicles, debris, and worker foot traffic and from activities such as the relocation of the existing agricultural ditch, construction of new drainage ditches and culverts, and filling of the existing ditches with clean material and removal of old culverts. Adults and juvenile California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders could become trapped and die in Frances Malamud-Roam 22
upland sheltering habitat or be exposed to predators if burrows or other refugia are crushed or covered. Preconstruction surveys, capture and relocation of individuals before work commences would help minimize these effects. Hand removal of emergent aquatic vegetation to reduce cover prior to the onset of work should also lower the likelihood of the presence of California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders during project activities.

California tiger salamanders could be injured or killed during burrow and crevice excavation.

Injury or mortality could occur from salamanders being crushed by equipment or collapsed burrows. However, having the assistance of Service-approved biologists with experience in burrow excavation do this work will minimize the effects of burrow excavation.

California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders may also be injured or killed by capture and relocation. They could be crushed by equipment or personnel, mishandled, subjected to physiological stress such as being held out of the water, exposed to pathogens or contaminants, or released into unsuitable habitat. However, the assistance of Service-approved biologists to do this work will minimize the effects of capture and relocation.

Long segments of exclusion fence may hinder the movements of dispersing California tiger salamanders and California red-legged frogs, and they may remain along the fence. This may expose them to predators or desiccation, leading to injury or mortality. The effects of the exclusion fence will be reduced by regular surveys of the exclusion fence by Service-approved biologists and designated monitors.

Uninformed workers have the potential to adversely affect California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders by killing, injuring or disturbing individuals. The potential for this to occur would be reduced by educating workers on the presence and protected status of these species and the measures that are being implemented to protect them during project activities.

The use of flagging to demarcate project areas would further reduce these potential effects by preventing workers from encroaching into environmentally sensitive upland or aquatic habitats.

Removal of sediment and emergent vegetation from waterways may have indirect effects on water quality in the action area downstream of the project area. Implementing best management practices to control erosion and sedimentation, and locating equipment and materials outside of wetted areas, would reduce these effects. These effects will be further minimized by the Corps’ and the City’s implementation of measures to prevent suspended sediment from moving downstream.

California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders may experience a disruption of normal behavioral patterns from worker foot traffic and activities and their associated noise and vibration. This disruption could cause individuals to leave or avoid suitable habitat and may increase the potential for predation, desiccation, competition for food and shelter, or strike by vehicles. Pre-construction surveys, conducting activities in the dry season, and relocation of individuals prior to project activities would limit these effects.

Frances Malamud-Roam 23
California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders could become trapped and die in excavated or backfilled ditches and trenches. Covering ditches and trenches each night to prevent entrapment of California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders should minimize this effect. Domestic animals, including pets, could disturb, injure or kill California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders if allowed at construction sites. Improperly impounding water may attract California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders, which could be injured or killed if additional water is added or removed.

Stockpiles of removed sediment and erosion control materials stored onsite can attract California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders seeking upland refugia, and lead to injury or death if individuals become entrapped or are present when these materials are moved. Surrounding active construction sites with exclusion fencing would reduce these effects. Accidental spills of hazardous materials or careless fueling or oiling of vehicles or equipment could degrade aquatic or upland habitat to the extent where California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders are injured or killed. The potential for this effect to occur would be reduced by informing workers of the importance of preventing hazardous materials from entering the environment, locating staging and fueling areas away from aquatic habitat, and by having an effective spill response plan and materials in place in the action area.

Trash left during or after project activities could attract predators to the action area, which could in turn prey upon California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders. For example, raccoons (Procyon lotor) and feral cats (Felis catus) are attracted to trash and prey opportunistically on the California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders (Service 2002, p. 66). We expect this potential effect would be reduced or avoided by the control of waste products at all work sites.

The proposed project would relocate the 0.12-acre drainage that serves as non-breeding aquatic habitat. The ditch would be permanently moved 100 feet north, and the acreage of the ditch would be maintained at 0.12 acre (J. Walther, EMC Planning Group, pers. comm. 2023).

Therefore, it is likely it would continue to provide moist refugia for California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders, but the water flow or volume may be different from before the project, and the aquatic vegetation would be removed. It is possible that aquatic vegetation may grow in the new segment of drainage ditch over time, providing refugia for amphibians.

The project would impact low-quality upland habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander. The project would temporarily impact 13.57 acres of low-quality upland habitat. The upland habitat is made up of active farmland, and it would return to active farmland after the project. Therefore, amphibians would experience a temporary loss of dispersal habitat and shelter availability due to the project. The project would permanently impact 10.38 acres of low-quality upland habitat that amphibians may use for dispersal or shelter. The City will mitigate for the permanent loss of habitat by purchasing upland habitat credits at Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank for California red-legged frog and California Frances Malamud-Roam 24
tiger salamander at a 2:1 ratio of area preserved to area impacted for permanent impacts. The credits will conserve habitat that is of higher quality than the habitat that is permanently lost due to the project.

Effects on Recovery
California Red-legged Frog and California Tiger Salamander We anticipate that effects on recovery of the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander from the proposed project would be minimal with implementation of the conservation measures. The project would result in a minor increase in urbanization, which is a threat for California red-legged frog in the Diablo Range and Salinas Valley Recovery Unit.

The project would not increase the threat of hybridization with nonnative salamanders, which is the main threat for California tiger salamanders in the Central Coast Range Recovery Unit.

The project would not preclude the Service’s ability to implement recovery actions in these recovery units.

Although the proposed project would temporarily impact 13.57 acres and permanently impact

10.38 acres of low-quality upland habitat, we expect the project to contribute to the recovery of both species over the long term. The City will mitigate for permanent impacts at a 2:1 ratio of acres conserved to acres impacted. This will result in approximately 20.76 acres of upland habitat conserved for California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders. The City will purchase credits at Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank, providing compensation with habitat that is higher quality than the habitat permanently lost from the project.

Summary of Effects
California Red-legged Frog and California Tiger Salamander Project activities would adversely affect California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders. The proposed project would affect juvenile and adult life stages of the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander if present in the action area, given the proximity of project areas to documented occurrences, presence of upland and dispersal habitat in the action area, and potential overlap of some project activities with periods when frogs and salamanders may be active. However, the Corps and the City proposed avoidance and minimization measures that would reduce project effects. Based on these factors we anticipate that few California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders are likely to be injured or killed during project activities, and that the project will not appreciably affect the recovery of both species.

CUMULATIVE EFFECTS
Cumulative effects include the effects of future State, tribal, local or private actions that are reasonably certain to occur in the action area considered in this biological opinion. We do not consider future Federal actions that are unrelated to the proposed action in this section because Frances Malamud-Roam 25
they require separate consultation pursuant to section 7 of the Act. We are not aware of any non-Federal actions that are reasonably certain to occur in the action area.

CONCLUSION
The regulatory definition of “to jeopardize the continued existence of the species” focuses on assessing the effects of the proposed action on the reproduction, numbers, and distribution, and their effect on the survival and recovery of the species being considered in the biological opinion. For that reason, we have used those aspects of the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander statuses as the basis to assess the overall effect of the proposed action on these species.

California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander Reproduction
The action area does not contain potential breeding habitat, and therefore we do not expect the proposed action to impact eggs, larva, or tadpoles. The Corps and the City propose to conduct initial site clearing and grading only during the dry season, which will minimize effects to dispersing individuals seeking breeding opportunities. Therefore, we conclude that the proposed project activities would not reduce the reproduction of California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander locally or rangewide.

Numbers
In the Effects of the Action section of this biological opinion, we state that some injury or mortality of California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander could occur during project activities, or as a result of capturing and relocating California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders. We expect such injury and mortality to be very infrequent, primarily due to the minimization measures implemented by the City. Therefore, we expect that loss of individuals, if any, would not appreciably reduce the species’ numbers locally or rangewide.

Distribution
Project activities would permanently reduce upland habitat for California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders. However, these impacts are a small portion of the habitat available in the local vicinity and an even smaller proportion of the habitat available in the species’ geographic range. We expect that over time, any individuals displaced by project activities would recolonize areas of temporary disturbance. Despite any habitat alterations that may result from the project activities, the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander would still occupy the aquatic features within the one-mile project buffer. We do not expect the Corps’ proposed activities to reduce the species’ distribution because the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander would occupy its current geographic Frances Malamud-Roam 26
distribution. Thus, we conclude that the proposed action would not appreciably reduce the distribution of California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander locally or rangewide.

Recovery
As described in the Effects of the Action section, the proposed project has been designed to minimize effects to California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander by implementing a suite of conservation measures, including mitigation for the loss of habitat. We have determined that the effects to California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander and their habitat would not be substantial on either a local or rangewide basis. Therefore, the proposed action would not appreciably diminish the species’ likelihood of recovery.

Conclusion for California Red-legged Frog and California Tiger Salamander After reviewing the current status of the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander, the environmental baseline for the action area, the effects of the proposed project and the cumulative effects, it is the Service's biological opinion that the proposed action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of both the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander because:

1. The project would not appreciably reduce reproduction of either of the species either locally or rangewide.

2. The project would affect a very small number of individuals and would not appreciably reduce numbers of either of the species at the local level or rangewide.

3. The project would not appreciably reduce either species’ distribution either locally or rangewide.

4. The project would not cause any effects that would preclude our ability to recover either of the species locally or within its range.

INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT
Section 9 of the Act and Federal regulation pursuant to section 4(d) of the Act prohibit the take of endangered and threatened wildlife species, respectively, without special exemption. Take is defined as to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. Harm is further defined by the Service to include significant habitat modification or degradation that results in death or injury to wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or sheltering.

Incidental take is defined as take that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity. Under the terms of section 7(b)(4) and section 7(o)(2), taking that is incidental to and not the purpose of the agency action is not considered to be prohibited taking under the Act provided that such taking is in compliance with the terms and conditions of this incidental take statement.

Frances Malamud-Roam 27
This incidental take statement is based upon the proposed action occurring as described in the accompanying biological opinion. Take of listed species in accordance with this incidental take statement is exempted under section 7(o)(2) of the Act. The Corps must ensure that the applicant implements the proposed action as described in this biological opinion and undertake the non-discretionary measures described below; otherwise, the exemption provided under section 7(o)(2) of the Act may lapse. The Corps has a continuing duty to regulate the activity covered by this incidental take statement. If the Corps: (1) fails to assume and implement the terms and conditions, or (2) fails to require the City to adhere to the terms and conditions of the incidental take statement through enforceable terms that are added to the permit or grant document, the protective coverage of section 7(o)(2) may lapse. To monitor the impact of incidental take, the City and Corps must report the progress of its action and the impact on the species to the Service as specified in this incidental take statement (50 CFR 402.14(i)(3)).

AMOUNT OR EXTENT OF TAKE
We anticipate that some California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders could be taken as a result of the proposed action. We expect the incidental take to be in the form of capture during relocation activities, and in the form of injury or death if individuals are accidentally injured or killed during capture and relocation, or cannot be collected for relocation and remain in project areas.

We cannot quantify the precise number of California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders that may be taken as a result of the Corps’ proposed action because species move over time; for example, animals may enter or leave the action area after the time of pre-activity surveys. California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders may be difficult to detect due to their cryptic nature, small body size, and low mobility. California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders also may be difficult to detect due to their use of aquatic habitats, underground burrows, or dense cover. Animals injured or killed during relocation efforts are likely to be observed; however, mortality from other sources, including the indirect effects of relocation (e.g., inability to find food in a new location) or displacement from the action area, would be difficult to observe. Finding a dead or injured California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander may also be unlikely due to their small size, cryptic coloration and potential to be quickly scavenged. The protective measures proposed by the Corps and the City are likely to prevent mortality or injury of most individuals.

Consequently, we are unable to reasonably anticipate the actual number of California redlegged frogs and California tiger salamanders that would be taken by the proposed project; however, we must provide a level at which formal consultation would have to be reinitiated.

The Environmental Baseline and Effects of the Action sections of this biological opinion indicate that adverse effects to California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander would likely be low given the nature of the proposed activities, and we, therefore, anticipate that take of California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander would also be low. We also recognize that for every California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander found dead or injured, other individuals may be killed or injured that are not detected, so when we Frances Malamud-Roam 28
determine an appropriate take level we are anticipating that the actual take would be higher and we set the number below that level.

Therefore, if three (3) adults or juveniles of California tiger salamander are found dead or injured, or are killed or injured during capture and relocation, the Corps must contact our office immediately to reinitiate formal consultation.

Furthermore, if three (3) adults or juveniles of the California red-legged frog are found dead or injured, or are killed or injured during capture and relocation, the Corps must contact our office immediately to reinitiate formal consultation.

Project activities that are likely to cause additional take should cease during this review period because the exemption provided under section 7(o)(2) may lapse and any further take could be a violation of section 4(d) or 9.

REASONABLE AND PRUDENT MEASURES
The measures described below are non-discretionary and must be undertaken by the Corps or made binding conditions of the permit issued to the City, as appropriate, for the exemption in section 7(o)(2) to apply. The Corps has a continuing duty to regulate the activity covered by this incidental take statement. If the Corps (1) fails to assume and implement the terms and conditions or (2) fails to require the City to adhere to the terms and conditions of the incidental take statement through enforceable terms that are added to the permit or grant document, the protective coverage of section 7(o)(2) may lapse. To monitor the effect of incidental take, the Corps or the City must report the progress of the action and its effect on the species to the Service as specified in the incidental take statement [50 CFR 402.14(i)(3)]. The Service believes the following reasonable and prudent measures are necessary and appropriate to minimize the effects of the incidental take of California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander:

1. The Corps must communicate with the City on future maintenance activities and implement specific project activity restrictions.

2. Biologists must be authorized by the Service before they implement conservation measures for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander, including but not limited to conducting surveys, excavating burrows, and capturing and relocating individuals.

3. The Service must be notified of the initiation of the project activities and provide access to the project site upon request.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
To be exempt from the prohibitions of section 9 of the Act, the Corps must comply with the following terms and conditions, which implement the reasonable and prudent measures Frances Malamud-Roam 29
described above and outline reporting and monitoring requirements. These terms and conditions are non-discretionary.

1. The following terms and conditions implement reasonable and prudent measure 1:
a. The Corps will inform the City that future maintenance activities, including vegetation maintenance consisting of mechanical removal and herbicide application that may affect California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders and require fill-discharge within the waters of the U.S., will require the Corps to complete a section 7 consultation with the Service. If there is no Federal nexus, the Corps will advise the applicant to contact the Service directly to consult under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act.
b. The Corps and the City will not impound water in a manner that may attract California red-legged frogs.

2. The following term and condition implements reasonable and prudent measure 2:
a. The Corps or the City must request our approval of any biologists that they, the applicant, or their contractors employ to conduct project activities associated with the California red-legged frog or California tiger salamander pursuant to this biological opinion. Such requests must include the Service’s reference number of 2022-0079978-S7-001 and be communicated by electronic mail via [email protected] at least 30 days prior to any such activities being conducted. Please be advised that possession of a 10(a)(1)(A) recovery permit for the California tiger salamander or California red-legged frog does not substitute for the implementation of this measure. Authorization of Service-approved biologists is valid for this project only.

3. The following terms and conditions implement reasonable and prudent measure 3:
a. The City must provide the Service access to the action area to survey and inspect project activities upon request.
b. The Corps or City must notify the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office via electronic mail ([email protected]) prior to conducting project activities pursuant to this biological opinion and include the Service’s reference number of 2022- 0079978-S7-001 in the electronic mail.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Pursuant to 50 CFR 402.14(i)(3), the Corps must report the progress of the action and its effect on the species to the Service as specified in this incidental take statement. The Corps must submit a post-construction report for each phase of the project within 90 days of completing construction activities, which must include all monitoring reports and results. The City and Frances Malamud-Roam 30
parties contracted by the City may prepare the post-construction report on behalf of the Corps, but the Corps must review the report to ensure compliance with the requirements of this biological opinion prior to submitting the report to the Service. The report should include the Service’s reference number of 2022-0079978-S7-001 and be sent to [email protected]. The report must describe project activities conducted under this biological opinion, including conservation measures described in the proposed action, and discuss any problems that were encountered in implementing conservation measures or terms and conditions and any other pertinent information. The report must also document all effects to California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders, including the following information:

The report must document the number of California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders observed, captured and relocated during the project, and the number killed or injured during project activities, if any; the dates and times of capture, mortality, or injury; specific locations and circumstances of capture, mortality, or injury; approximate size and life stage of individuals; and a description and map of relocation sites.

Furthermore, the Corps must, by January 30 following each year the authorization is in effect, provide an annual summary of these post-construction reports describing the activities that occur and their effects on covered species. The report must include confirmation that credits were purchased from Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank, such as a copy of the Bill of Sale(s) and Payment Receipt as described on pages 10 and 23-24 of this biological opinion. The report should include the Service’s reference number of 2022-0079978-S7-001 and should be sent to [email protected]. The Corps must report all observations of federally listed species to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for inclusion in the California Natural Diversity Database.

DISPOSITION OF DEAD OR INJURED SPECIMENS
As part of this incidental take statement and pursuant to 50 CFR 402.14(i)(1)(v), upon locating a dead or injured California red-legged frog or California tiger salamander, initial notification within 3 working days of its finding must be made by in writing to the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office ([email protected]). The report must include the Service’s reference number for the biological opinion, date, time, location of the carcass, a photograph, cause of death or injury, if known, and any other pertinent information.

The Corps or the City must take care in handling injured animals to ensure effective treatment and care, and in handling dead specimens to preserve biological material in the best possible state. The Corps or the City must transport injured animals to a qualified veterinarian. Should any treated California red-legged frog or California tiger salamander survive, the Corps or the City must contact the Service regarding the final disposition of the animal(s). The remains of any California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders must be placed with the Santa Barbara Natural History Museum, contact: Paul Collins, Santa Barbara Natural History Museum, Vertebrate Zoology Department, 2559 Puesta Del Sol, Santa Barbara, California 93105; (805) 682-4711, extension 321. The Corps or the City should make arrangements with Frances Malamud-Roam 31
the Museum regarding proper disposition of potential museum specimens prior to the commencement of project activities. In the case of take or suspected take of listed species not exempted in this biological opinion, the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office must be notified within 24 hours.

CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS
Section 7(a)(1) of the Act directs Federal agencies to use their authorities to further the purposes of the Act by carrying out conservation programs for the benefit of endangered and threatened species. The conservation recommendations below are discretionary agency activities to minimize or avoid adverse effects of a proposed action on listed species or critical habitat, to help implement recovery plans, or to develop information and can be used by the Corps to fulfill their 7(a)(1) obligations.

1. We recommend that dead California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders found in the action area be tested for amphibian disease.

2. For the purpose of investigating hybridization, we recommend that dead California tiger salamanders undergo genetic analysis, given that 30 hybrid larvae were recorded in nearby ponds.

3. The Corps should investigate the efficacy of capturing and moving of California redlegged frogs and California tiger salamanders to determine the extent that this minimization measure reduces adverse effects of project activities on the species. As part of this, information on repeat capture and behavior of individuals post-movement should be noted.

4. As a Federal agency, the Corps should promote the conservation of all federally listed species per section 7(a)1 of the Act. Mitigation that is intended to offset take of listed species or the loss of their habitat should not only offset the effects of the proposed action, but promote the recovery of listed species. We are available to assist you with expanding mitigation opportunities or developing conservation actions. You also can use the Service’s recovery plans and 5-year reviews, as guidance, where we outline actions needed to promote conservation of listed species.

The Act defines "conservation" as "to use and the use of all methods and procedures which are necessary to bring any endangered species or threatened species to the point at which the measures provided pursuant to this Act are no longer necessary." The Service requests notification of the implementation of any conservation recommendations so we may be kept informed of actions benefitting listed species or their habitats.

REINITIATION NOTICE
This concludes formal consultation on the action(s) outlined in your request dated September 8, 2022. As provided in 50 CFR 402.16, reinitiation of formal consultation is required where Frances Malamud-Roam 32
discretionary Federal agency involvement or control over the action has been retained (or is authorized by law) and if: (1) the amount or extent of incidental take is exceeded; (2) new information reveals effects of the agency action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not considered in this opinion; (3) the agency action is subsequently modified in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species or critical habitat not considered in this opinion; or (4) a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the action. In instances where the amount or extent of incidental take is exceeded, the exemption issued pursuant to section 7(o)(2) may have lapsed and any further take could be a violation of section 4(d) or 9. Consequently, we recommend that any operations causing such take cease pending reinitiation.

If you have any questions about this biological opinion, please contact Danielle Clearwater of my staff by electronic mail at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Stephen P. Henry
Field Supervisor
Enclosure

LITERATURE CITED
Alvarez, J. A., D. G. Cook, J. L. Yee, M. G. Van Hattem, D. R. Fong, and R. N. Fisher. 2013.

Comparative microhabitat characteristics at oviposition sites of the California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii). Herpetological Conservation and Biology 8(3):539–551.

Anderson, J. 1968. A comparison of the food habits of Ambystoma macrodactylum sigillatum, Ambystoma macrodactylum croceum, and Ambystoma tigrinum californiense.

Herpetologica 24:273-284.

Barry, S.J., and H.B. Shaffer. 1994. The status of the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) at Lagunita: A 50-year update. Journal of Herpetology 28:159-164.

Bulger, J.B., N.J. Scott, and R.B. Seymour. 2003. Terrestrial activity and conservation of adult California red-legged frogs (Rana aurora draytonii) in coastal forests and grasslands.

Biological Conservation 110:85-95.
[City] City of Salinas. 2022. Project Habitat Impacts. East Boronda Road Widening. [CNDDB] California Natural Diversity Database. 2021. California Department of fish and Wildlife. 2021. Records for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander. Accessed September 2021.
[DAPTF] Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force. 1998. The Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force (DAPTF) fieldwork code of practice. Froglog 27.

Davidson, C., H.B. Shaffer, and M.R. Jennings. 2001. Declines of the California red-legged frog:
climate, UV-B, habitat, and pesticides hypotheses. Ecological Applications 11:464-479.

EMC Planning Group Inc. 2020. Habitat Assessment Report for California Tiger Salamander and California Red-Legged Frog. Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project (CIP NO.9510).

Feaver, P.E. 1971. Breeding pool selection and larval mortality of three California amphibians:

Ambystoma tigrinum californiense Gray, Hyla regilla Baird and Girard, and Scaphiopus hammondi Girard. Master’s thesis, Department of Biology, Fresno State College, Fresno California. 58 pp.

Fellers, G.M., A.E. Launer, G. Rathbun, S. Bibzien, J. Alvarez, S. Sterner, R.B. Seymour, M. Westphal. 2001. Overwintering Tadpoles in the California Red-legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii). Herpetological Review. 32(3) 156-157.

Fellers, G.M. 2005. Rana draytonii Baird and Girard, 1852b California red-legged frog.

Pages 552-554 in M. Lannoo (editor). Amphibian declines the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press. Berkeley, California.

Fisher, R. N., and H. B. Shaffer. 1996. The decline of amphibians in California's Great Central Valley. Conservation Biology 10:1387-1397.

Hanski, I., and M. Gilpin. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain.

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42:3-16.

Hayes, M.P., and M.R. Tennant. 1985. Diet and feeding behavior of the California red legged frog Rana aurora draytonii (Ranidae). The Southwestern Naturalist 30:601- 605.

Hayes, M.P., and M.R. Jennings. 1988. Habitat correlates of distribution of the California redlegged frog (Rana aurora draytonii) and the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii):

Implications for management. Pages 144-158 in R. Sarzo, K.E. Severson, and D.R.

Patton (technical coordinators). Proceedings of the Symposium on the Management of Amphibians, Reptiles, and Small Mammals in North America. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-166.

Holland, D.C., M.P. Hayes, and E. McMillan. 1990. Late summer movement and mass mortality in the California tiger salamander (Ambyostoma californiense). Southwestern Naturalist 35:217-220.

Jennings, M., and M. Hayes. 1994. Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern in California. California Department of Fish and Game Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova, California.

Jennings, M.R. 1988. Natural history and decline of native ranids in California. Pages 61–72 in H.F. De Lisle, P.R. Brown, B. Kaufman, and B.M. McGurty, editors. Southwestern Herpetologists Society special publication number 4: Proceedings of the Conference on California Herpetology. Southwestern Herpetologists Society, Van Nuys, California, USA.

Jennings, M.R., and M.P. Hayes. 1985. Pre-1900 overharvest of California red-legged frogs (Rana aurora draytonii): The inducement for bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) introduction.

Herpetological Review 31: 94-103.

Jennings, M.R., and M.P. Hayes. 1994. Amphibian and reptile species of special concern in California. Report to the California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova, California. 255 pp.

Leyse, K., and S.P. Lawler. 2000. Effect of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) on California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) larvae in permanent ponds. Mosquito Control Research, annual report 2000.

Loredo, I., and D. Van Vuren. 1996. Reproductive ecology of a population of the California tiger salamander. Copeia 1996:895-901.

Loredo, I., D. Van Vuren, and M.L. Morrison. 1996. Habitat use and migration behavior of the California tiger salamander. Journal of Herpetology 30:282-285.

Orloff, S. 2011. Movement patterns and migration distances in an upland population of California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Herpetological Conservation and Biology 6:266-276.

Pechmann, J.H.K., R.A. Estes, D.E. Scott, and J.W. Gibbons. 2001. Amphibian colonization and use of ponds created for trial mitigation of wetland loss. Wetlands 21:93-111.

Petranka, J.W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press.

Rathbun, G.B., M.R. Jennings, T.G. Murphey, and N.R. Siepel. 1993. Status and ecology of sensitive aquatic vertebrates in lower San Simeon and Pico Creek, San Luis Obispo County, California. Final Report under Cooperative Agreement 14-16-0009-91-1909 between U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Parks and Recreation. Publication Number PB93-230779, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

Robins, J.D., and J.E. Vollmar. 2002. Livestock grazing and vernal pools. Pages 401-430 In Vollmar, J.E. (Ed.). 2002. Wildlife and rare plant ecology of eastern Merced County’s vernal pool grasslands. Vollmar Consulting, Berkeley, California.

Rathbun, G.B., and J. Schneider. 2001. Translocation of California red-legged frogs (Rana aurora draytonii). Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:1300-1303.

Rathbun, G. B., M. R. Jennings, T.G. Murphey, and N.R. Siepel. 1993. Status and ecology of sensitive aquatic vertebrates in lower San Simeon and Pico Creek, San Luis Obispo County, California. Final Report under Cooperative Agreement 14-16-0009-91-1909 between U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Parks and Recreation. Publication Number PB93-230779, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

Scott, N. 2002. Annual report, California red-legged frog, Rana aurora draytonii, Permit TE-036501-4. Unpublished report submitted to the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office.

Semlitsch, R.D., D.E. Scott, and J.H.K. Pechmann. 1988. Time and size at metamorphosis related to adult fitness in Ambystoma talpoideum. Ecology 69:184-192. [Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996. Determination of threatened status for the California red-legged frog. Federal Register 61:25813-25833. [Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final rule to list the Santa Barbara County distinct population of the California tiger salamander as endangered. Federal Register 65:57241-57264, September 21, 2000. [Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Recovery plan for the California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. viii + 173 pp. [Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of endangered status for the Sonoma County distinct population segment of the California tiger salamander; final rule. Federal Register 68:13497-13520, March 19, 2003.
[Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of threatened status for the California tiger salamander; and special rule exemption for existing routine ranching activities. Federal Register 69:47212 47248, August 4, 2004.
[Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Revised designation of critical habitat for the California red-legged frog; Final rule.

Federal Register 75:12816-12959.
[Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Recovery Plan for the Central California Distinct Population Segment of the California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiese). U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California.

Shaffer, H.B., R.N. Fisher, and S.E. Stanley. 1993. Status report: the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Final report for the California Department of Fish and Game. 36 pp. plus figures and tables.

Shaffer, H.B., G.M. Fellers, S. Randall Voss, C. Oliver, and G.B. Pauly. 2004. Species boundaries, phylogeography and conservation genetics of the red-legged frog (Rana aurora/draytonii) complex. Molecular Ecology 13:2667-2677.

Stebbins, R.C. 2003. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians, third edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiii + 533 pp.

Storer, T.I. 1925. A synopsis of the amphibia of California. University of California Publications in Zoology 27:1-342.

Tatarian, P.J. 2008. Movement Patterns of California Red-Legged Frogs (Rana Draytonii) in an Inland California Environment. Herpetological Conservation and Biology. 3(2):155-169.

Trenham, P.C. 1998. Demography, migration, and metapopulation structure of pond breeding salamanders. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Davis. 96 pp.

Trenham, P.C. 2001. Terrestrial habitat use by adult California tiger salamanders. Journal of Herpetology 35:343-346.

Trenham, P.C., and H.B. Shaffer. 2005. Amphibian upland habitat use and its consequences for population viability. Ecological Applications 15:1158–1168.

Trenham P.C., H.B. Shaffer, W.D. Koening, and M.R. Stromberg. 2000. Life history and demographic variation in the California tiger salamander. Copeia 2000:365-377.

Trenham, P.C., W.D. Koenig, and H.B. Shaffer. 2001. Spatially autocorrelated demography and interpond dispersal in the salamander Ambystoma californiense. Ecology 82: 3519-3530.

Twitty, V.C. 1941. Data on the life history of Ambystoma tigrinum californiense. Copeia 1941:1-4.

Wilbur, H.M., and J.P. Collins. 1973. Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science (n.s.), 182:1305-1314.

Wilcox, J.T., Davis, M.L., Wellstone, K.D., Keller, M.F. 2017. Traditional surveys may underestimate Rana draytonii egg-mass counts in perennial stock ponds. California Fish and Game 103(2): 66-71.

Wright, A. H., A.A Wright. 1949. Handbook of frogs and toads of the United States and Canada. Comstock Publishing Company, Inc., Ithaca, New York. 640 pp.

IN LITTERIS
Lieske, Patrick, Forest Wildlife Biologist, US Forest Service, Solvang, California. 2021.

Electronic mail to Dou-Shuan Yang, Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California. Subject: California red-legged frog data – Matilija Creek Watershed, dated October 1, 2021.
[Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2021. Letter to Frances Malamud-Roam, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from Leilani Takano, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, dated April 28, 2021.

Walther, Janet. 2023. Planning Group Inc. Electronic mail addressed to Danielle Clearwater, U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service, dated January 20, 2023. Subject: Boronda Road Questions.

The Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force Fieldwork Code of Practice A. Remove mud, snails, algae, and other debris from nets, traps, boots, vehicle tires, and all other surfaces. Rinse cleaned items with sterilized (e.g., boiled or treated) water before leaving each work site.

B. Boots, nets, traps, and other types of equipment used in the aquatic environment should then be scrubbed with 70 percent ethanol solution and rinsed clean with sterilized water between study sites. Avoid cleaning equipment in the immediate vicinity of a pond. wetland, or riparian area.

C. In remote locations, clean all equipment with 70 percent ethanol or a bleach solution, and rinse with sterile water upon return to the lab or "base camp” Elsewhere, when washing-machine facilities are available, remove nets from poles and wash in a protective mesh laundry bag with bleach on the “delicates” cycle.

D. When working at sites with known or suspected disease problems, or when sampling populations of rare or isolated species, wear disposable gloves1 and change them
between handling each animal. Dedicate sets of nets, boots, traps, and other equipment to each site being visited. Clean them as directed above and store separately at the end of each field day.

E. When amphibians are collected, ensure that animals from different sites are kept separately and take great care to avoid indirect contact (e.g., via handling, reuse of containers) between them or with other captive animals. Isolation from unsterilized plants or soils which have been taken from other sites is also essential. Always use disinfected and disposable husbandry equipment.

F. Examine collected amphibians for the presence of diseases and parasites soon after capture. Prior to their release or the release of any progeny, amphibians should be quarantined for a period and thoroughly screened for the presence of any potential disease agents.

G. Used cleaning materials and fluids should be disposed of safely and, if necessary, taken back to the lab for proper disposal. Used disposable gloves should be retained for safe disposal in sealed bags.

For further information on this Code, or on the Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force, contact John Wilkinson, Biology Department, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0) 1908-654167 1 Latex gloves should not be used. They are toxic to amphibians. Use vinyl or nitrile disposable gloves instead.

Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project CIP No. 9510 Initial Study Project Plans
Figure 4
Source: Wallace Group 2019
0 350 feet
STAFF PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT-FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY-CA GOVT CODE SECTION 6254(A) a
a
b
b
PHASE 2a
PHASE 2a
PHASE 2b
PHASE 2b
ATTACHMENT "B"
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-211, Version: 1
Compact Utility Tractor and Verticutter-Seeder Purchase Approve a Resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute the purchase of one (1) 2024 John Deere 2025R Compact Utility Tractor, (1) Verticutter-Seeder and allow for a 10% contingency for a total amount not to exceed $56,532.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/3/2024
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 7, 2024
DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES

PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: KRISTAN LUNDQUIST, LCS DIRECTOR

DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: TERRY MILLEMAN, FLEET MANAGER
TITLE: COMPACT UTILITY TRACTOR AND VERTICUTTER-SEEDER

PURCHASE
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute the purchase of one (1) 2024 John Deere 2025R Compact Utility Tractor, (1) Verticutter-Seeder and allow for a 10% contingency for a total amount not to exceed $56,532.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Fleet Division of the Public Works Department working in conjunction with the RecreationPark Division of the Library and Community Services Department have identified funding to purchase one (1) 2023 John Deere Compat Utility Tractor and (1) Verticutter-Seeder to be added to the Park Maintenance fleet. The Tractor will be used daily by Park Maintenance staff to perform work in the City of Salinas parks. Given current inventory challenges, and the immediate action required to successfully purchase the available vehicle, we are asking for authorization to purchase the one (1) Tractor from Deere & Company, (1) Verticutter Seeder from Land Pride using Sourcewell state bid quotes and allow for a 10% contingency for any price increase due to market volatility in an amount not to exceed $56,532.

BACKGROUND:

Compact utility tractors have a reputation for being the “multi-tool” of equipment, as these machines can be transformed, using an array of attachments, to tackle just about any task. The Park Maintenance team doesn’t currently have a compact utility tractor making it challenging to efficiently address some of the day-to-day functions like moving dirt, tree bark, sand, and mulch.

The included backhoe attachment will greatly increase the efficiency of irrigation mainline repairs while reducing the chances of injury by hand digging. Additionally, the tractor can be used to operate the grooming implement that is necessary for the maintenance of our new synthetic soccer Page | 2
field. A Verticutter-Seeder will allow the Park Maintenance team to properly tackle turf renovation projects as well as quickly repairing damage as a result of vandalism and vehicles driving on turf.

The Public Works Fleet, in conjunction with the Recreation-Park Division, selected the John Deere due to fleet consistency ensuring that we have quick repair and maintenance turnaround. RDO, a local dealership, has provided the Sourcewell State Bid quote John Deere 2025R compact utility tractor at $32,960.22. This includes a backhoe attachment and a bucket attachment. Land Pride has also provided a Sourcewell State Bid quote for the Verticutter-Seeder at $17,917.75.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The requested Council action directly relates to Council’s Strategic Plans or Goals of providing “Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability”. The purchase of these items will allow the Recreation-Park Division to address day-to-day functions more efficiently.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Recreation-Park Division in coordination with Fleet Maintenance had a meeting to discuss the needs of the Department. We concluded that the vehicle and attachments in this report meet both the needs of the Recreation-Park Division, as well as the requirements of the Fleet Maintenance Division. The Finance Department will coordinate the purchase and title change.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Funding is available and appropriated in 1200.55.5238. Ongoing operating costs are subject to appropriation.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Quotes
RESOLUTION NO.____________(N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DIRECT PURCHASE OF A COMPACT

UTILITY TRACTOR AND VERTICUTTER-SEEDER
WHEREAS, the Parks Department desires to purchase one (1) 2024 John Deere Compact Utility Tractor and one (1) Verticutter-Seeder; and WHEREAS, funds are appropriated and available within the Parks operating budget Capital Outlay Equipment account (1200.55.5328-66.5400); and WHEREAS, Staff chose the 2024 John Deere Compact Utility Tractor from RDO of Salinas who provided a Sourcewell state bid at a cost of $32,960.22; and WHEREAS, Staff chose the 2024 Verticutter-Seeder from Land Pride. The Sourcewell state bid quote was prepared by C&N tractor from Watsonville at a cost of $17,917.75; and
WHEREAS, the City Council can approve this purchase pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 12-27 (exception to low-bid based competition) in contracting for equipment, materials, supplies and services and pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code 12-28 (local purchasing preference).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Salinas City Council authorizes the Interim City Manager and the Purchasing Agent to complete the direct purchase of one (1) new 2024 John Deere Compact Utility Tractor from RDO of Salinas at a cost of $32,960.22, and one Verticutter-Seeder from Land Pride at a total cost of $17,917.75.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Salinas City Council approves a contingency of 10 percent of the combined total due to market volatility and authorizes the Purchasing Officer to utilize the contingency as required to complete the purchases authorized by this Resolution.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 7
th day of May, 2024 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Quotes of equipment offered through contracts between Deere & Company, its divisions and subsidiaries (collectively “Deere”) and government agencies are subject to audit and access by Deere's Strategic Accounts Business Division to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the contracts.

Vendor: Deere & Company
2000 John Deere Run
Cary, NC 27513
Signature on all LOIs and POs with a
signature line
Contract name or number; or JD Quote ID
Sold to street address
Bill to email address (required to send the invoice and/or to obtain the tax exemption certificate
Customer:

Quotes are valid for 30 days from the creation date or upon contract expiration, whichever occurs first.

A Purchase Order (PO) or Letter of Intent (LOI) including the below information is required to proceed with this sale. The PO or LOI will be returned if information is missing.

Kosty Kevin
RDO Equipment Co.
501 El Camino Real S
Salinas, CA 93908
Tel: 831-424-8036
Fax: 831-424-3127
Email: [email protected]
For any questions, please contact:

Ship to street address (no PO box)
Bill to contact name and phone number
Bill to address
Membership number if required by the contract

ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT
TO (VENDOR):

Deere & Company
2000 John Deere Run
Cary, NC 27513
FED ID: 36-2382580
UEID: FNSWEDARMK53

ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT
TO DELIVERING DEALER:

RDO Equipment Co.
501 El Camino Real S
Salinas, CA 93908
831-424-8036
[email protected]
Confidential
Salesperson : X ______________ Accepted By : X ______________ Quote Summary
Prepared For:

CITY OF SALINAS
426 WORK ST
SALINAS, CA 93901
Business: 831-758-7213
Delivering Dealer:

RDO Equipment Co.

Kosty Kevin
501 El Camino Real S
Salinas, CA 93908
Phone: 831-424-8036
[email protected]
Sourcewell Account # 2424 Quote ID: 30473439
04 March 2024
07 March 2024
Created On:

Last Modified On:

Expiration Date: 03 April 2024
Equipment Summary Selling Price Qty Extended
JOHN DEERE 2025R Compact
Utility Tractor (18 PTO hp)
$ 30,089.90 X 1 = $ 30,089.90
Contract: Sourcewell Ag Tractors 082923-DAC (PG 1P CG 70) Price Effective Date: March 6, 2024
Equipment Total $ 30,089.90
* Includes Fees and Non-contract items Quote Summary
Equipment Total $ 30,089.90
Trade In
SubTotal $ 30,089.90
Sales Tax - (9.25%) $ 2,783.32
Tire Fee $ 7.00
Sourcewell Delivery $ 80.00
Est. Service
Agreement Tax
$ 0.00
Total $ 32,960.22
Down Payment (0.00)
Rental Applied (0.00)
Balance Due $ 32,960.22
Quote Id: 30473439 Customer Name: CITY OF SALINAS
Selling Equipment
Confidential

ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT
TO (VENDOR):

Deere & Company
2000 John Deere Run
Cary, NC 27513
FED ID: 36-2382580
UEID: FNSWEDARMK53

ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT
TO DELIVERING DEALER:

RDO Equipment Co.
501 El Camino Real S
Salinas, CA 93908
831-424-8036
[email protected]
JOHN DEERE 2025R Compact Utility Tractor (18 PTO hp)
Hours:

Stock Number:

Contract: Sourcewell Ag Tractors 082923-DAC (PG 1P CG
70)
Price Effective Date: March 6, 2024
Selling Price *
$ 30,089.90
* Price per item - includes Fees and Non-contract items Code Description Qty List Price Discount% Discount
Amount
Contract
Price
Extended
Contract
Price
151NLV 2025R Compact Utility
Tractor (18 PTO hp)
1 $ 21,341.00 18.00 $ 3,841.38 $ 17,499.62 $ 17,499.62
Standard Options - Per Unit
0202 United States 1 $ 0.00 18.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
0409 English Operator's Manual 1 $ 0.00 18.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1710 Factory Installed Loader
with Single Point Hydraulic
Coupler and Bucket
1 $ 6,260.00 18.00 $ 1,126.80 $ 5,133.20 $ 5,133.20
2000 Open Operator Station 1 $ 0.00 18.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3701 260B Factory Installed
Backhoe with Bucket
1 $ 9,094.00 18.00 $ 1,636.92 $ 7,457.08 $ 7,457.08
4061 Less iMatch™ Quick Hitch
Category 1
1 $ 0.00 18.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
5205 12-16.5 (4PR, R3 Turf, 1
Position) Bias Ply
1 $ 0.00 18.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
6205 23 X 8.50-12 (4PR, R3 Turf,
1 Position) Bias Ply
1 $ 0.00 18.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
Standard Options Total $ 15,354.00 $ 2,763.72 $ 12,590.28 $ 12,590.28 Value Added Services
Total
$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
Total Selling Price $ 36,695.00 $ 6,605.10 $ 30,089.90 $ 30,089.90

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-221, Version: 1
Surplus Vehicles and Equipment for Disposal
Approve a Resolution pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code section 12-15 declaring vehicles and equipment surplus and authorizing their disposal.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/3/2024
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 7, 2024
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS, FLEET MAINTENANCE DIVISION
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: TERRY MILLEMAN, FLEET MANAGER
TITLE: SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FOR DISPOSAL
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a resolution pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code section 12-15 declaring vehicles and equipment surplus and authorizing their disposal.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

BACKGROUND:

City Council is authorized pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 12-15 to declare City vehicles and equipment no longer suitable for public use as surplus and to authorize their disposal through contracted auction services. Following here, and attached to the resolution, is a list of vehicles and equipment that are recommended for disposal or auction:

Year QTY Make Model Vin/Serial Auction/Scrap Unit #
2005 1 GMC C-5500 1GDE5C1215F529286 AUCTION PW 625
2014 1 CHEVY EXPRESS VAN 1GCWGFCG5E1161592 AUCTION PW 32 2001 1 FORD F 250 UTILITY 1FTNX21L91ED50902 AUCTION PW 22 UNKNOWN 1 MASTER
WORLD

COUCH N-A AUCTION LIBRARY
UNKNOWN 1 UNKNOWN THROW RUG N-A AUCTION LIBRARY

UNKNOWN
1 ROCKWELL

PLAINER
37-220 EP6127 AUCTION PROP#
2705

UNKNOWN
1 CRAFTSMAN

DRILL PRESS
115 6962 N-A AUCTION PROP#
2703
1 ROOFING
FOAM

N-A AUCTION FACILITIES
2017 1 CHEVY TAHOE 1GNLCDEC6HR207845 SCRAP POL 370
2019 1 DODGE CHARGER 2C3CDXKTXKH749604 SCRAP POL 314
Page | 2
2020 1 Forest River Stealth RV 4X4TSJC27LE010925 AUCTION PW 857 2020 1 Forest River Stealth RV 4X4TSJC23ME011054 AUCTION PW 856 2021 1 Forest River Stealth RV 4X4TSJC25ME011055 AUCTION PW 853 There are two police vehicles listed to be disposed of as scrap. These vehicles have severe mechanical issues and have already been scheduled for replacement. Parts that have some use will be removed to be used on other vehicles as needed. In doing this, we estimate to have approximately six to seven thousand dollars in parts that we will likely use on future repairs. We will take these vehicles to A&S metals afterwards and get scrap value for the chassis and receive a certificate of destruction.

Vehicle 32 has a blown engine and is due for replacement this upcoming fiscal year. The vehicle isn’t worth the cost of the repair. For these reasons were asking for permission to dispose of this vehicle at auction. The other 2 vehicles have already been replaced. They will be sold at auction.

John Steinbeck Library has requested disposal of an old leather couch and a throw rug carpet. Fleet staff picked these items up and will be adding them to the auction.

Facilities replaced their old Rockwell plainer and Craftsman drill press with safer and more efficient machines. These older machines will be sold at auction. There is left over roofing foam from the city hall roofing project. There is no use anywhere else in the city. This leftover foam materials will be sold at auction.

Community Development has 3 RV trailers that were donated by the State of California during covid to house homeless people. They are currently vacant, and the interiors are damaged beyond reasonable repair. These will be sold at auction.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

DEPARTMENT COORDINATION:

Disposal of surplus property requires staff time from Finance Purchasing Division, Police Department Vehicle Maintenance and Administration Divisions, Fire Department Vehicle Maintenance and Public Works Vehicle Maintenance Division.

Vehicle maintenance personnel must remove City equipment and decals from the vehicles. Public Works Vehicle Maintenance Division makes minor repairs on the vehicles to get them operational for better sale value. Fleet Maintenance coordinates and lists the sale with the auction companies.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Disposing of vehicles and equipment not suitable for City use supports City Council goals of “Operational Efficiencies”.

Page | 3
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The sale of the identified surplus should generate approximately $15,000 to $20,000 in revenue.

ATTACHMENTS:

Council Resolution
Surplus Vehicles and Equipment List
RESOLUTION NO. _________(N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION DECLARING CITY VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT

SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THEIR DISPOSAL
WHEREAS, the City of Salinas needs to dispose of surplus vehicles and equipment no longer suitable for City use; and
WHEREAS, City Council has the authority to declare City property and equipment surplus and to authorize the disposal of such property and equipment pursuant to Section 12-15 of the Salinas Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, utilizing auction companies is more efficient than the traditional method of annual public auction; and
WHEREAS, Vehicle Maintenance and Purchasing will determine best course of action for disposal through contracted auction companies.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Salinas City Council that City Council declares the items on the Surplus Vehicles and Equipment list attached to this Resolution as surplus and authorizes their disposal through auction companies by the Purchasing Officer and Vehicle Maintenance staff.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of May 2024 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
_________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Year QTY Make Model Vin/Serial Auction/Scrap Unit #
2005 1 GMC C-5500 1GDE5C1215F529286 AUCTION PW 625
2014 1 CHEVY EXPRESS VAN 1GCWGFCG5E1161592 AUCTION PW 32 2001 1 FORD F 250 UTILITY 1FTNX21L91ED50902 AUCTION PW 22 UNKNOWN 1 MASTER
WORLD

COUCH N-A AUCTION LIBRARY
UNKNOWN 1 UNKNOWN THROW RUG N-A AUCTION LIBRARY

UNKNOWN
1 ROCKWELL

PLAINER
37-220 EP6127 AUCTION PROP#
2705

UNKNOWN
1 CRAFTSMAN

DRILL PRESS
115 6962 N-A AUCTION PROP#
2703
NEW 1 N-A ROOFING
FOAM

N-A AUCTION FACILITIES
2017 1 CHEVY TAHOE 1GNLCDEC6HR207845 SCRAP POL 370
2019 1 DODGE CHARGER 2C3CDXKTXKH749604 SCRAP POL 314
2020 1 Forest River Stealth RV 4X4TSJC27LE010925 AUCTION PW 857 2020 1 Forest River Stealth Rv 4X4TSJC23ME011054 AUCTION PW 856 2021 1 Forest River Stealth RV 4X4TSJC25ME011055 AUCTION PW 853 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-230, Version: 1
Envisio Solutions, Inc. Public Dashboard Software Annual Subscription Approve a Resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute the annual subscription agreement with Envision Solutions, Inc. (Envisio) for an amount not to exceed $31,500.00 for a 1-year subscription to the Envisio public dashboard software, licenses, and online support services.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/3/2024
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 7, 2024
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
FROM: SOPHIA ROME, COMMUNITY RELATIONS MANAGER
TITLE: ENVISIO SOLUTIONS, INC. PUBLIC DASHBOARD SOFTWARE

ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute the annual subscription agreement with Envision Solutions, Inc. (Envisio) for an amount not to exceed $31,500 for a 1-year subscription to the Envisio public dashboard software, licenses, and online support services (Attachment 2).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

In 2022, the City entered into an agreement with Envisio following selection of Envisio as the most qualified vendor through the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process. The goal of acquiring this platform was to obtain a software that would provide the necessary tools for the creation of public dashboards and data management. The first dashboards were launched in May 2024, and the Community Relations Manager will continue working with departments to identify and create additional project dashboards. Continued subscription provides us access to the licenses and software required to maintain them and create new ones.

BACKGROUND:

The City Manager’s Office in coordination with the Public Works GIS Division (GIS) has been working to improve communication and transparency as it relates to the progress of projects and initiatives. In December 2021, the City released an RFQ for a Performance Management Tracking & Reporting Platform to improve efficient, innovative, accessible, and transparent access to data while driving continuous improvement and public engagement. Envisio was selected as the most qualified respondent and GIS began working with departments to identify Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that could be shared through the dashboards. In March 2022, the City Council approved a mid-year budget appropriation for the acquisition of the Envisio software to create the public dashboards.

In May 2024, the City announced the launch of the first two dashboards – Alisal Vibrancy Plan Implementation Dashboard and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Dashboard.

Page | 2
CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Continued subscription to Envisio aligns with the following Strategic Plan Goals:
 Economic Development through the Alisal Vibrancy Plan implementation dashboard and promotion of the City’s continued investment in Salinas  Effective and Culturally Responsive Government by providing data to the community through the public dashboards to support informed community engagement using data and filling a technology gap for our residents
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Coordination for usage and management of the Envisio software includes Administration, Community Development – Advanced Planning & Project Implementation Division, Finance – Information Systems, Legal, and Public Works – GIS.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Funding for this agreement has been budgeted and appropriated and will be paid through the General Fund (1000.12.1111 – Administration/City Manager).

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1: Resolution – Draft
Attachment 2: Envisio, Inc. Agreement
Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)
ENVISIO SOLUTIONS, INC. PUBLIC DASHBOARD SOFTWARE ANNUAL

SUBSCRIPTION
WHEREAS, On December 17, 2021, the City of Salinas (City) released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a Performance Management Tracking & Reporting Platform to improve efficient, innovative, accessible, and transparent access to data while driving continuous improvement and public engagement; and
WHEREAS, Envisio Solutions, Inc. was selected as the most qualified respondent to the RFQ; and
WHEREAS, On March 31, 2022, the City and Envisio executed a Professional Services Agreement to begin staff training and creation of the public dashboards; and WHEREAS, Continued subscription is required to access the licenses and software necessary to maintain and create new public dashboards.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes the Interim City Manager to execute the annual subscription agreement with Envision Solutions, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $31,500.00 for a 1-year subscription to the Envisio public dashboard software, licenses, and online support services.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 7
th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
_______________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
ENVISIO SOLUTIONS INC.

MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT
PLEASE READ THIS MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”) CAREFULLY. THIS AGREEMENT APPLIES TO ENVISIO SOLUTIONS INC. (“ENVISIO”) AND ANY CUSTOMER (THE “CUSTOMER”) WHO UTILIZES ENVISIO’S SAAS STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION SOFTWARE SERVICES DESCRIBED HEREIN (THE “SERVICE”), WHETHER OR NOT THE CUSTOMER PAYS FOR THE SERVICE.

ACCEPTING THE TERMS

BY ACCEPTING THIS AGREEMENT, EITHER BY CLICKING A BOX OR BY EXECUTING AN ORDER OR QUOTATION FORM THAT REFERENCES THIS AGREEMENT, THE CUSTOMER AGREES TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF THE CUSTOMER IS

ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF A COMPANY OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY, THE CUSTOMER REPRESENTS THAT IT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO BIND SUCH ENTITY AND ITS AFFILIATES TO THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS. IF THE CUSTOMER

DOES NOT HAVE SUCH AUTHORITY, OR THE CUSTOMER DOES NOT AGREE WITH THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, THE CUSTOMER MUST NOT ACCEPT THIS AGREEMENT AND MAY NOT USE THE SERVICES.

1. PURCHASED SERVICES

1.1.Provision of Purchased Services
Envisio shall provide to the Customer the Service that is ordered by the Customer (“Purchased Services”) on Envisio’s invoice or quotation form (each a “Quote”) during a Subscription Term (as defined below), attached hereto as Appendix A.

The Service is hosted on Envisio’s service provider platform, “Heroku” (owned by Salesforce.com). Heroku’s physical infrastructure is hosted and managed within Amazon’s secure data centers and utilizes the Amazon Web Service (“AWS”) technology. The Customer further acknowledges that the Customer Data (as defined below) resides on AWS’s servers either in the USA or Canada (available on request). The Customer may access the Service, but has no right to receive a copy of the object code or source code to the Service. The Customer must have high speed Internet connection, and compatible hardware and up to date ‘browser’ software to access the Service, none of which are Envisio’s responsibility.

1.2.Subscription License
Unless otherwise stated in the applicable Quote, the Purchased Services are purchased as a subscription license (the “Subscription”) and non-transferrable to a third party. Additional Users (as defined below) can be added to the Subscription during the Subscription Term at the same pricing as the underlying Subscription, prorated for the portion of that Subscription Term remaining, and any added Subscription will terminate on the same date as the underlying Subscriptions.

2. ENVISIO’S RESPONSIBILITIES

2.1.Provision of Service
Envisio will use commercially reasonable efforts to make the Service available to the Customer 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, except for planned downtime of which Envisio shall provide at least 24 hours notice via the Service and scheduled to the extent practicable during the weekend hours between 6 pm Friday and 3 am Monday Pacific Time. Any unavailability caused by circumstances beyond Envisio’s reasonable control including but not limited to: the malfunction of equipment,

Page 1 ends

Salinas City CouncilMay 7, 2024

Salinas City Council
May 7, 2024